Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Use Permit 89-1 - Coastal Ddevelopment Permit 89 s now Office of the city,;1a of 'n7 _ r CityHu�� ��'a���,�cach �y il `�,►ti p q ,,�Mc,t ic'y CALIFORNIAii,�8� t 1 t JJjjii fi t�,1 , . i R � 11.2 ' P"v0 :'cLL M . Hick.- I' . t:� . Hey: 310 �y f� i•ia:t:; :l. I1 '� �:Lt3':'i�:�l:.;;I. :L:I,.i':Lt:);''t:);t F'F:.'1 lJt'•;Ad •f t:) ,'ii f i�tl:>L:.I�' I .0-1W. orrIftafthe cityci.rk IV. u011 ; + ' City Huntington 'each r-' 1 11• i 't: Ma.1 X 190 CALIFORNIA 92 A �� i Arta 1P " �arnl 1?�a7.It14'i1�' a ' 199 r , initas J CA 92024 P.O,M lily +�sra�u s761� �' ��:M � � �� ��' �s �y� 1`r a w t � 102 rt t 024-1 47..1 q SYL'VIA SHA.gDnICK •�� 6021 Dayfe nrive f Huntington Beach, CA 92647J i SMA 21 �� t3J�p�1. �' TrMiwip-rrF, pXpn r 1 ypd 4 . I 1 1 ' EYFIBIT M ENVI1wOTMENTAL I MPAC1' REPORT NO . 8 9-4 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERAT TONS 1 'Ph -, F'ina ) Environinental Impact R:13ort No 09-4 for the propn:sed i construction of a maximum ot. 70 , 726 square fee- of mixed use development; identifies cent i i n unavoidable significant adverse environmental offs;ta . CEQA Guid-:�'lines Section 15093 requires the decislon-maker (lilartrUnq Commission) to balance the bennCits of a f proposed project against unavoidable environmental risks in determining whetter the project should be approved . If the 3ecisior.- maker concludes t:tiat, the benefits or: the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects , the effects may be considered acceptable . Here , the City of Huntington ©each does find t:hal the benefits flowing to the City Bnd its residents from the project outweigh the significant adverse environmental effects which remain after the project ' s mitigation measures aio implemented . Primary among such considerations are: the elimination of blighted conditions existing in the Main-Fier, Redeveloprle3nt Project Area , elimination of seisinic deficiencies , and the project ' s furtherance of the Downtown Specific Plan and Local Coastal Plan - s objectives of incr. easitig acces., to coastal amenities and revitalizing the Downtown area . Another important consideration is Lhe revenue that will result to the City anti Lhe Redevelopment Aq :�ncy from the project as a result of i-acreased property value which revenue; can be used to improve service Isvesls , construct capital facilities . L)ruvide additional affordable housing , and for other important public, purpose4 . The final EIR identities two unavoidable adverse environmental impacts ( see Section 613 in the EIR - Unavoidable Significant Adverse Impacts) . These are : 1 . Increased light from new sources associated with the project . 2 . Project-specific and cumulative impacts to the historical context , physical and architectural resources , proposed Main Street Historic: District , onsite historic resources , and ctiimulative impacts to historic resources within the community in general . Some of these effects are lessened by +,he mitigation measures suggestod in the SIR , which measures will be required And incorporated into the project . The reasons the City hps determined that the remaining effects uf each impact are acceptabl- yiven offsetting project benefits , are discussed below . -17 - } oa84 A"Atu" x , 1 r►c r is:i s�,d Light The project: wil Increase the amoisnt± o. lir_.ht generated on t 4ir, site relative to that which cuxrenuly ex-J, sts . New light soW'ces art:, associated with ne%i clrnmerci.al structures , street lignt:ing , and traffic lighting , 4hic.h will be vise ble from adjacent: areas find contribute to gencri; l night sky illumination . Such lighting will be risible due to the relW.ve height of the buildings (max� murn three storit,.E) in relation to stir roundi.nq uses , particularly those to t 'ie nor�h and went . o-Ylever , the perceived impact ut this project will decrease river me because as other major developments occur , this project will , r;drasert less of the total liclht ;;ounce . The adjacent m,ilti •-story retail-parking structure, and the nearby pier oavillion project , for example, will detract F. roin the oe-:ceived impact of this site , Additionally , an increase in light may have beneficial effects , such as added safety for motorists and p :?destzians . The ET.R identifies mitigation measurer, to lessen t:he impacts ot: lighting , which have been incorporated into the conditions of approval . These include shielding and screening of: light s,,7urces , in conformance w? Lh the Downtown Design Guidelines . Given the many public benefits of: t:he project as referenced above , the City finds that the incremental increse in light associated with the. pr:- , %ct is acceptably: . At worst case , the project will include the demolition of all structures on the site , including 15 historic structures . The loss of these structures will have a significant adverse impact on the potential Downtown Historic Distric , on-site physicuil any. acchi. tectural resources associated with the CiLy ' s history , a»d the cumulative stock of historic Structures wi' ;hin the City . The Elk has identMed mitigation measures that will help lessen these impacts • including complete documentation of the site to be maintained for public review , and a progrfrr to ensure that construction vibration impacts do not affect of[ site h4.sloric strr.„tures . The No Project altscriative identifi .d in the CIR is expected to have less impact on historic structures than the proposed project , however this alternative may riot as effectively fulfill the important project: objectives of revitalizing the Main Street covenercial corridor, enhancing the street scene downtown , and encouraging pe:,a$trian traffic . Likewise, alternatives identified in the Lift that would pra'.:ibit demolition of existing structures would hava less impact on historic r.lisources , but: wctald not provide for rejuvination of commercial uses along this block tr the ssime extent as the project . These alternatilies would not provide for . as 6084 k, + ; r NMI r vO much squ irg. footege each property owner ass, ne► pr-oier:l' , nor wound they provide for highat 'cents accruing to new huildinys , as %*uld the proposed project . Addi :: iot,ally , the altetrnatlyes out]- i:-.e1 in t.ae EIA would entail many of the srme environinenta A effects as the p oposisd project . 1 flawed upon the above considerations , thu C;.';y finds that: the Public benefits of the project ov-t:weigh the Impacts on him to : i.c resources remaining 3fte:. mitil,gat:ioii , These hor►efits irr-1nde rrovision �, f fhigh quality mixed u.5y dove lopment. along the vital commercial. cos(: downtown and -,►ih,encGnent of t1le street scene in accordance, with the Downtown Design Guidelines , both of which will contribute to the _ ,Juvir,,atitrn of Downtown . The project will also implement the Ylaitor -serving objectives of the Uowrltown Specific Plan and Loral Coastal Program. and will ensure: the elimination of seismic deficiencies . I i I I i i I f r ' 1 6 �1r wr1 , NOW, 1 6084 hop STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORMGE CI fig OF HUNTINGTON BEACH) 11 CONNIE BRQCKWAY , Clerk of 'he Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO WREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing I res 7l uti on was duly adopted her the Re1evel opment Age.hcy of the City of Huntington Beach at a meeting of said Rewevelrpment Agency hod on the E 6th day of Noygo1 .Y._,_..�. 13U_, and than It was so adopted Eby the following vote: `r. AYES: Members: I �.[' �1 j_.. ►^� r���. Banni star,_!j ��1 Erskine NUE.S. Mzmbers: I Wi nchel 'I ABSEN" Members: f None �T R o the ��e cryment.'- gancy� -he City of Huntington Beach , Ca. • j i I 41 4 � 1 e Cour+ci 1 chamber , Ovi c Centf:r Hur.ti ngt;on Reach, C&I i fori)i a Hor;day, November b , 1389 A tape recording of this meeting is on file in the City Clerk' s Office. Mayer Bannister called the regular meetings of the City Council and the Redovelopment Agency of ths� City of Huntington npAc•h to order at 7 n .m. BULL&ANI Present: MacAllister, Greer , Winrhell , Fannister, Mays , Silva, Erskine Absent: None �w��r,a��a►r►r�+��o-.a+��r ��r+rRr►**r �►'.,�r�aa���*�,r�r ,�wr �r�a *�����,r�,��'�� a.*�rr��,rrr��c +r,��,r,r�� r Is UI i IONAL USE PERN, 1 .__ A1=1_.HI7H SPPEECIAL ..�� J1 YLlKMlENIAL 18W REMI' NP� APPEAL DENIED �A' iEQ 1t 1YF ��QQ��1 (1 — RE1VRT A Pia .. . ....s �r�r ERrY O_ff_M1N/ 'I .A) The Mayor Announced thak this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following; RPLICK : Conditional Use Permit No. 89-1 with special permits C.oaas tal Development Permit No. 89-1 , and Environmental Impact Report No. 89-4. AEF1 : City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency APEFL,L�-VI: Counci !man MacAllister LMILM: One block bounded by Maid Street, Walnut Avenue, Fifth Street and Olive Avenue. ]ME: Downtown Specific Plain District 5 (Mixed Use - Coaerciai/Office/Residential ) . REQUEST: Appeal of Planning Comission's approval of a► request to allow construction of up to 700726 square feet of mixed use development in one city block. The requested special permits include a) zero foot build-to line on Mein Street in lieu of 5 feet; b) zero foot setback on Walnut Avenue in lieu of 5 feet*& c) up to 30 feet of building height within 25 feet of Main Street In lieu of 25 foot building height. : This action is covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 69-4. which the Council will also consider. Page 2 - Counci 1/Agews.,/ Minutes - 11/6/89 ML M.W: Norw-appealable portion of the Coastal Zone. Legal requirements for notification, p6olication and posting had been met. No cowwrwunications or written protests received on the Matter, The City Cleric presen�ed Eesoln tm-AQ,,.-fi ;or Council consideration - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL NCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGM BEACH, CALIFORNIA At1oP'"(NG DWROWNTAL IMPACT REPORT W. 89-•4 FO.'i THE MIXEC USE DEVELOPMENT 80i1NDED 8Y MAIN STREET, WALNUT AVENUE,, FIFTH STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE." The Mayor declared the hearing opera. 12ha- to spoke on behalf of Oscar Taylor And his fami ',y. He stated that even tho+agh the family did not take part in the racat,-. Program that they were still entitled to ;harking spaces . He stated he believed the family' s property should not have been excluded from the chart that showed the existing square footage and narking to be grandfathered and that the information should was made public and made available in tho future so that it insured the recelval of entitlmAwents. Bill Gallegos , property owner, inquired information from Council regarding parking spaces to be grandfathered in. He stated he warted a complete disclosure of all areas and wanted to sce computations and permits done and made available. He stated the parking space should be written in the deed to insure parking . Dick HarloN, property owner, stated he was in support of taking action on the matter as soon as possible as he waited to demolish his building and start new construction. He supports the 4' widening of Main Street, the 0' setback on Walnut, and he supports a 30' building height to accommodate two stories . There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. The Community Development Director explained the Facade Program ofrered to those owning property in the Znd block. Discussion was held between the City Administrator, the Community Development Director, and Councilwoman Hinrhell regarding the Facade Program and the sites of the property owners who were not participating. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Bannister, to (1 ) deny said appeal and sustain the planning CoamNission decision, adopt and certify as adnquate EIR No. 89-4 and adopt Resolution No. 6M, (2) approvo Coastal Development Permit No. 89-1 and Conditional Use Permit No. 89-1 with spocial permits, with findings and conditions of approval as outlined in Attachment No. 1 of the November 6, 1989 RCA with additional wording to be included in Page 3, Paragraph 3, Item 4d. After the word "existing" in the second line it ewail road ". . .approved legal and permitted uses within that square footage. " The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: MacAllister, Green, Bannister, Mays, Silva, Erskine MES: winchell ABSENT: Nang i,•r n 0,nib t; �; ,;' Response ftO fsaQt Of the Facade Brant program involves distribu;:ion Af Agency . a to property owtnere who improve the appearance of buildings on the b ko Most of which buildings are of historic significance to the QOMunity- The City has determined that encouraQing both facade rehabilitation and new construction in this block will beat meet the gpject objectives stated on page 13 of the LIR Suction 2 . 5 - Project Mmct1ve8 , Therefore, no alteirnativq sites were chosen . itonslir, the CUP and CDP implant a previously approved program dos this block. P Y PP P 9 The decision maker (Planning Commission) does not have the descretion to relocate the program to another block. For a discussion of the alternatives that were examined please refer to Section 4 . 0 -• A� LeraAtivea to the Proposed Project . rAL 5 Comment Them is but one logical conclusion : to truly carry out the high sounding objectives of bath ;:he "Facade Grant Program" and the "Heritage Square Block" these two programs should be switched: wHeritage Square B+ock" should apply to west 200 Block of Main Street, ' and the `'Facade Grant Program" should apply to east 300 Block of Main Street . DXL 5 Response The comment is noted and included •ti the final record of the project � for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . DML b Common t fi=11 3,1 u i1 IJIN ExiS D Fourth Paragraph : 205 Main Street is a ��l�g�� sty building and 207 Main Street is a. 1 1/2 stoty building , DM S Response Section 3 . 1 of the Final EIR will be c,)rrect;ed accordingly. V.4L 7 Comment Rag& 97 First ParagLaph: 5 full lots ar3 ,i., . ly unpaXWLdi.".t and two .lots are one- alf unpaved dirt, each. 7 Response motion 3 .2 of the Final FIR will be corrected accordingly. Fw_ w ,, 1 GOMM a Cca nt � 4 aiamaiougas ., .� 3'tgst paragraph: The historic name of 217 Main Street is "TJ= Tal,bort - Leatherman Building" . Third Paragraph: That vertical-paned transoms move the store windows and door are rriginal 1904 conatrurtJg12 features . INS 99 first Paragraph: The building 12 the first joint pro ect of the , Talbert-Leatherman Partnership * Second Paragraph: In 1904 "Z�gPionear Feed and Fuel CoMR&O 0 was located here at the first occupants, and offered feed for horses and domestic animalsr heating fuel for houses , and gasoline foz automobiles . Third paragraph : 217 Main Street is the eldest building in the JUD.ch . Fourth paragraph : 217 Main Street is currently a religious Meeting Hall Page 55 First paragraph : This building is the oldest remaining structure in the ock (or project area) . � E _ Second paragraph; This building is significant as an example of a "Cali£arnia House" built western false front structure. , DHL 8 Re mpons s Section 3 . 3 of the Final EIR will be corrected accordingly. DKL 4 Comment 3 - 5 plr►itttlMl , a; First Paragraph: I only analyxod t*o entries out of 20 in Appendix "C" - Parking table or 10% of the Total . They are " as follows 207 Main Street 1 (3735d) -4- ir 4: My 06 This building was originally a vaudvillee theatre with a raised stage and wings with dressing rooms beneath. When the useage changed, it became a 1 112 story commercial storefront with the stage, wings , .1 and dressing roams intact, used for storage (totaling about Sup square feet of 2nd story) . The sF, ?wilding stay►&& this way until 1987 when the current occupant started illegally bootlegging in sections of Mezzanine. This was done in four ntages over the 1987-1988 pe$rik:d without permits . A casteal examination *#ill shown the Meettani,nes to not meet code . The bootleg Mezzanine covers approximately 1 ,350 square feet , so the 21950 square `hoot 2nd story of 207 Main Street in Appendix "C" actually consists of 500 square feet of 2nd story, 103SO square feet feet of bootleg Mezzanine recently constructed, and 1 , 100 square feet of Heir shaft - it doesn' t ezistl also, the use given in " retail/offi ce3" . There is no office apace in this building, it is all retail . Go the actual requirement is one parking space per 200 square feet . If you only give credit for code-constructed square footage (3 ,450 squares feet) . The parking requirement is 17 . 250 spaces . "'he illegally constructed bootleg mezzanine (10350 square feet) would add 6 . 750 spaces it the city rewards breaking the law and Y don ' t think anyone gives parking credit for 1 , 100 square feet or air . 217 Main Street i This building consists of a single-story, storefront with a permit-&dd,ed bathroom addition. The mai building is 10210 square feet , not 1, 100 as in Appendix "C" . S'he bathroom addition adds 16 squares feet for a total of 1# 226 square feet , lab square feet more th;n listed in Appendix "C" . Appendix "C'' gives the use as "reading room* . If you will refer to Attachment "A" and "B" in this letter, you will see that the occupancy permit actually is for "a non-profit meeting hall (not to be used as a church) " and, In fact, this is exactly what 217 Main Street has been used as for the last 10 years or more. Additionally, the "maximum occupant load permitted - 80% tells you it is not a reading room. The same church group has occupied 217 Main Street since June, 1979, holding meetings every Tuesday and Thursday night with occasional use on other ° evenings, but only as a meeting hall. The parking ' resgetireament , as given in Huntington Beach Ordinance Code Section 9606-C (please reefer to Attachment "C") In "1 parking space- per 35 square feet of public assembly area, or 1 per 3 fixed seats, whichever is gresateer" (there are no fixed legatos in the building, (3735d) -5- 4 only folding chairs being used) . The actual parking requirement for 317 Main Street therefors, is 35 .029 spaces, not 3 . G67 spaces as given in Appendix "C' - By city code, this in rounded off to 36 Npace$ in actual use. am 9 Response 1•be square footage$ listed in Table B, page 11 , of IEIR No. 89-4 and rgpeatod in the Existing Parking Requirements table in Appendix C of th* document are meant to be approximation& of the existing square footage on the block based on outsider dimen$ions of the buildings . These numbers are to be used only to determine whether there is, a #e;hi,nq deficiency on the block. These figures are not to bo used to determiner how many parking spaces are to be Vrandfathered in as part of the Facade Grant Program. As you have noted, some structures will have creator square footage then lusted, others will hav® less . 7Cti clarify �. this point within the document, the following note will be added to fOt existing both the previously mentioned tables and to the parking supply demand on page 75 of EIR No . 89-4 : I Note : Square footages/parking requirements listed are approximations of the existing square footages/requirements within the Demonstration Block. These figures are not to be used to calculate the smovint of space to be grar.�Afathered in as part of the Ci,ty ' s Facade Grant Program. In addition, Mitigation pleasure No . 1 of the Parking sec:tzon, page 82 , will be changed to read : 1 . They City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency shard be responsible for parking space3 required for existing square footage. The number of spaces fur tothieh the Agency will be responsible shall be based on existing legally constructed square footage* to be verified pzfor to issuance of building permits. i Mm 10 Comment The correction& show an 3dditi0nal 85P required parrying for existing square footage in this 11% sample areL . It further adds a full 8 . 65% required parking spaces to the project as a whole, even if there are no other mistake$ . Barod on this sample, plus the fact that there are 16 additional buildings yet to be re-analyzed ( 89% of the total project) one can only conclude that the entire Appendix "C" parking table appears to be invalid. If true, any decisions arising from figures from Appendix "C' ore partly or completely incorrect . These would include, but not be limited to : project Summary, page XXV - Parking Table Wo page is - Project Characteristics uble "B" , page 11 Statistical Square Footage Exhibit 9, Existing Land Use Section 3 .5, Parkingo page 74-82 in its entirety Section 6. 5, page 94, Parking, 1 . Appetnd'is "Coo in its entirety (3735d) •-�- ' h" �.... + � dome JL'" OM 10 Response AX aot*d in 1M 9 Response, the estimation of the parking deficiency Within the Lewastrotion Black is an approximation . They major.ty of the uses wlthi~r the Demonstration Block fall, within the categories of ,.. rpatsurant, enetral retail or offices use. The "moetintZ hall" at 217 Main 0trest to quite an unusual use for the project area and has an at"ieal psrking requirement compared to uses within the project area . lsrefores the 85% change in parking requirements in your 11% sample or** is not in any wax representative of the remainder of the Demonstration Block . A mores general approximation of parking demand at the site can be made using the parking ratio for general commercial developments : I space rr 200 square feet . Given the 53 , 000 square feet estimated to exist the block and the parking demand ratio of i space per 200 square feet, the required number of spaces for the block would be 265 . The Ost4materd parking demand given in EIR No. 89-4 shows a parking demand of 277 spacers , i number quite close to 255 . Taking all the gveviously mentioned factors into cr.nsideration, the following statement in SIR No . 89- 4 is more than adequately supported by the estimation of this ,.Airront parking demand for the block: "The existing parking supply on the Demonstration Block) does not � pPDemonstration meet current demand for the project block and currently there exists a substantial deficiency. " (page 75) . In addition, the calculation of the existing parking defic;iencias for the Demonstration Block is included in the "Existing Conditions" section of the parking study and in no way effects the impact assessment section of the study. project-specific parking impa-:ts from the proposed project were assessed based upon the passible total square footage for the block and the total number of perking spaces to be provided . Cumulative parking impacts from the project were assessed based upon the total square footage of the proposed project and related projects in the area , bs well as the proposed parking spaces to be provided within the area , Assessment of the project ' s parking impacts is not effected by the analysis of existing deficiencies onsite. DML 11 Comment SSCTIQN , - c?THER_ GROWTH — J NDUC Z fG EFFEC'j'J Second paragraph: The goal of more than doubling retail square footage as in Option 2 will most certainly affect local tra' fic congestion, resulting in local air quality impucts, local noise level impacts, and local public service demand! increases . (3730d) - 7- e� s^ r 6 . , . "$range Wvarlier 221 (Rut 82-2) was prepared in 1982 for the Downtown area, 1usive of this project site. in the discussion of the Initial Study t6c the ppsopowed project * they City focused iut several potential impact &&%, sa reltted to the project beceuso the topics were previously .:` M844 BIR 02 -2 . These include the areas of t roff ic, air Ofte-litys no ses. and local public serviced . Please refer to Appendix A aiptbo XIh for discussion. IM 12 Conant AArs moiset public services, project generated traffic will be Significantly impacted if Option 2 buildout is achieved, more than doubling retail square Moorage in this project area . 1 hope these findings, corre::tions ,, and comments will be of some use to you In our common goal of improving the g,uRli ty of life: hers in Huntington beach . DWL 12 Response Please refer to DML 11 Response . The comment is noted and included in; the final, record of the project for review and consideration by the appropriates decialonmakers . THE LINTY UY MINTING`fOW BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD - (HRD) "Re 1 Comment Thank you for giving the Historic resources Board the opportunity to review the Draft EIR No , 89--4 . After reviewing this document the Board had the following comments . The statement on page I states , "The Downtown Specific plan was adopted by City Council in 1983 with the intent of recognizing the rich downton .'history as the central focus of the City' s civic, recreational# and business activities . * we believe from that statement theot that this Rnvironmental Impact Report does not adequately address that stet nt . 1 Response fto cossnent is noted and included in the final recard of the project for review and consideration by the appropriate de cisionmakers . r : m „h ,0 h' fig fJ! f'' rt fii JU 441 ,A rr .ii,041i8 that we faiind are: , , r A. rp arty at 214-5th Street (Terry Body Shop) was ,. , ,' ► �� prior to the completion of this RIR, by the City of 'calorie b on page 11 of the RIR will be corrected to show 214 F!fth street as vacant in the "R:isting" column. psi .59 of the #IR motor that the structure "is included in both the f liunti,ngtoa Beach Historic Rescurcas Survey Report and they { A i1164owp ,Jlssooiated Report but had been de:mol.ithed since the /'� bra bt ae 6ri� -both " ' 'mow owmat is toted and included in the final record of the project ' for review and consideration, by appropriate d"isionmakers . MW 2 Comment R. On page 85, mentions the property at 411 Olive as one of "the fire remaini uq vacant parcels " , this property is not vacant but in the current site of the Huntington Beach. Surf Museum. This aetructure along with the Shank House at 202-5th street has been declared histcric and has had an application submitted to the city for iehabi.litation. 42B 3 Response Page 66 of the SIR regarding 411 Olive will be corrected accordingly. The coea vents are noted and included in the final record of the project- . i KRB 4 Comment C. On page 4 , under the options the EIR is remiss in not mentioning the obvious third option that being to allow the independent property owner the option to rehabilitate his property without the aid of a city sponsored Facade Grant Program. Response plaosq . tefpr to DKL 2 Response . ,1 16. VUd3V Hi5t0tic ROBOUrces on page 93 , #2 needs c la r if ictation o VeViov by Wbo (City Council, Planning Commission, Design Roview board, Historic Resources Board, etc. ) Tbis ststemint ;�� •�s as�iguat�e. MR" Response 078 ) `9- A Z �1�'h1'! `4f ,.L4, •�rr..:i_rn.14_.,.�rvr .__ .., _,::: L. ' ' ,, ,' ..._,.._IL1'_' ,r rar�r:�l, 1 '�. M- 1 a ,•N i Stet et Voters f.'o approved by the Director of Community •'r�' lopaessrt , � �onrsent reviewing X1U we could not find any financial breakdown for the er-ent options/alternatives nor was an economic analysis prepared to 4 # )LAS prowarky owner the different advantages connected with each optiR�eltera+wive. Me d Response woes not require an Ravirotumental Impact; Rapport to present tinancial or economic analysis . CLQA Guidelines section 15131 states t t* 'The focus of the analysis shall be on physical changes . " ftnMwlc changes or effects of a project need not be analysed in any de*e#1 greater than necessary to trace the chain of cause and effect of cbangee in the physical environment . in this case, it is not necessary to detctrmine the financial advantages of each project option in order to adequately analyse the impacts on the environment . The EIR clearly identifies that any removal of historic structuras will, have an adverse Impact on the environment . MB 7 Comment We conclude that this will have significant impact on the project g p historical resources of our city. These are just but a few ot the inadequacies found in Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 . H5 7 Response Pages 47 and 63 of the EIR -- Prgiegt Site 920cific Impacts and Cytsulatiye Impacts note that the project will have significant adverse impacts on historic resources within the City which cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. The comment is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers. 8019T SMS BEACH HISTORIC SOCIETY -- (HSHS) MW 1 Comment I have reviewed NIH No. 89-4 for the society and wish to make the following couments on its behalf Me XXR represents a conscientious effort to catalog the historic buildings, widen the rehabilitation project area. However, theris are swerel - abio.4gias due: to new information on initial oversight whit) sbou <be mods. 1* 203-206 Win Street: This is; the site of the early 1Wn11=tQ& Now Inspoetion indicates that the building on this site is of masonry consttructior, and is , therefore, unlikely to be they original building. Despite this , it rides date before the 1935 earthquake because it shows evidence of post earthquake damage renovation, (37254) - 10- R R Guj�i,ywi r k� r ,W ' .�. Ewa•' w... RIMPW 2 .a of the f i.na i Slit will be amended accordingly. ¢,.., �� � fit• " die •dtteetl This should be referrf,d to as the io 001bartr/Leathermann bui)dinge acknowledging its construction by thboo two- city pioneers e ., ,Plosss rotor to OM IS Response. 293 Kalift Street : The burkhnrt was designed in the style of Irving ` dill, but extensive library, research is unable to connect it �q directly with him. An early City resident has recently stated that the Owlrler", prank Burkhart, designed the structu �e. D8L. ite the 1&cX of direct relationship to they inaster Sout:aeru California architect, Irving Still, this commercial structure is still locally significant because it is the only one in Huntington Beach which reflects his influence, NHS 3 Response Section 3 .3 of the Fina) EIR will be amended accordingly. HBH$ 4 Comment i 4 . Main Street Histiric District : The rehab project block, alone, constitutes a potential historic: district even though the integrity of the ar- i- lier proposed boundaries has been compromised. An application for National RegiGter status should be made for just the block to verify its status and eligibility for federal *existence programs . HHRR$ 4 205ponne The copmrnt is noted and included in the final record of than project ior review and consLderation by appropriate decisionmskers. .r, 5 Cbment b li*Ve tbS 41ecuSSiou of the alternatives to this project is `-- +ete. At least two of the alternatives are recognized as � �1r At*1%Y supetior to the project, but there is not enough date to ne the economic feasibility of either . For example, no is mrde of tho potential use of Federal tax credits to make } r' bili•tation more attractive trier, dowla.`"•'�' • Lion. Unless those -;, iAgarn&tivea ere proven Infeasible by now data (which will probably into ireeirculation of the Li'1', , the lead agency will be unable to Notify a statement of overriding consideration to approve the project. r r . t ., 7�.�,+, . ,«.'.„ .. .,, ,- . ... , . _ � —_ ., : •aril .M'� ! J p r 21 I threes alternatives to the project discussed in the SIR are Cound to ' ►iaram"tally superior to the proposed project in that they reduce Bally adverse impseta on histoiAo structures. However the SIR is Vowlf*4 by CXQA to analyse economic feasibility at that project or #fit 41tri tivass, Xcono+ LC feasibility is only a factor when the +i l�r ,os s�us�r approves a project that has significant onvirOnMOntal larsets, and rejects mitigation measures or project alternatives based ecton"ir, infeasibility of those measures or alternatives. However, 'r80010A 19091 of ChOft allows the decistomakor to reject such elt*rustives on the basis of social or other conni.derations which make the siternative infeasible. Since economic considerations ace Alt a sator to rejecting alternatives in this case, nn comparative analysis '. 8-,,#ee#APdV plemme refer, to exhibits R and c, Statement of Overriding Axiderstions, and Findings . The specific findings adopted by the daeclotormaker will be included in the Final FIR. 9 • i 1f;a wi r 4M \'0 , R RZOOLUTION NO. 3,419 Rka= 80LU`1'IN OF THE 'LANNINQ C01►tMI15BI014 OF T $ CITY aF rt HUNTINGTON BEACHo CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT , : ,• [ ' NO. 89-4 P09 THE MIXED USE DEVSLOPMEIRT BOUNDED NY r, KArN BTRNBT, WALNUT AVENUE, FIFTH STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE WHXItXhg Environmental, impact Report No . 89- 4 and related ' #Ui l0mente have been prepared; and , ., :'�, ' The City of Huntington Beach was the lead agency in the '*&ration of the Environmental Impact Report and All persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly " . given hsvo been heard by the Planning Commissions either tt.rough written notice or during a public hearing on September 18 , 1989 , and on Octobar 3 , 1989, such responses and c:omuents as were ,nade were duly noted and ragponded to . 110W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the FlaLninq Commission of the City of Huntington Beach as follows : SECTION 1 . The planning Commission does hereby find that Lnwlzonmefntal Impact Report No . 89-•4 has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all State and local guidelines . SECTION 2. The elanning Commission has considered all significant effects detailed In Environmental Impact Report Vo. N4-4 , together with axisting and proposed measures to mitigate such Significant effects (see Exhibit A) . 8RCTION 3 . The planning Commission find that through the implemntation of the aforementioned mitigation measures , the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the proposed project can be elixr.inated or reduced to a level of ihts igni f ieance. SECTION 4. The planning Commission furthez finds that the ,A Mote *CCruing to the City by virtue of Implementing the Downtown N., ;� . K­ 144100 t"fist' Jpl",r override the unraitigetable effects detailed in , `� a tal rNPact Report Ito,. 89�-4 and the attached Statement of A' tj°4di ►t�e�idoratic�ne (awe Exhibit e) , and the Planning ; . *IF tihe City of Huntington Beach does hereby adopt and 4**t1ty BE adisquste Rrivlrawwntah Impact Report No . 89 4 . ,I r I'. I' T 69�G" 'IO�i h Planning �c ckoac is h�Me authorized and � tsd to file "ith the Of f ice of that County Cierk a notice of ,,,... orpluttion for Snvironaaental Impact Etepurt No . 89--4 , as required , 40tion 21152 of the California Rnvirunmental Quality Act VASNXD AND AWPt90 by the Planning Commission of the, City of 4 04 86aCh On the 3rd day of October, 19Rp by the following Grote w� ,• x I I 4 r4r •, 1 ' &AIX a Mike Adams , secretary Planning CommissionC'hair,man (361xd) ,w a 1 ; r14 . 7{ 11 R . 'p t,l i' '� MF ''' 'rf !1 r � • it f i I'Ig • ''x`r J01 IN -"A 10 "r , ; +f�hw .?*,' iy M7"•I�R''++ 4 t i, 'fq a 1• ' f' ',?r �'+ri, , .r 00 r� e:i'Jrr NITITION SUM w (1"181096 to am T) ! , , ana landscape plon eba%l be aubsait:twd to the DesiOn . .: ar�i aid/e�C ' „ty 2tannio � dit wnt each pro ty ? ba,. to tdvs� a slipperAJts# e odstion *n4 type " MF 4"�pgojo to t t ►iS101%$ of t;he RUnt:ifigton a� ba co,*iafent *4tb the stataada aft a 32 at the Downtown 6681 daidel.inea . All I 'V and landscaping materials shall also be consistent 4.., III the gutdolines . 3. �:', : y aball. encourage and/or sponsor a pienned sign program + , st ds of Main Street, This progrram shall Include f' 'gd�b a 4 gn amortization, City funded removal. of existing i and, and City funded purchass and mounting of now signs. ` 3. The City shall implement consistency of similar hardsrcaps and landscape on Math sides of Nair . , :/beat; ,T 4 . The project shall implement the following mitigation measure * ncluded in ftwntown Specific Plan Litt No. 82-2 . Depending on the results of soils studiesconducted for now construction mitigating measures will be required to be Igor raged into -the project . Theme measures may include but 'rPoLllmted to : buffer, special grading, special foundations,, r,a, "# ar,not dewatering devices , and retaining walls. v. rahenaive documentation of the project sitar, as it et►�eetetly wrists, shall be prepared prior to the issuances of any �uildinq, grading, and/or demolition permits . The documentation shall be in accordance with standards established by the Historical American Buildings Survey/Historical American Zngineering Records (MASS/MASK) . The report shall be archivalir maintained with provisions for public access . The costs associated with preparation and maintenance of the documentation shall be the responsibility of tb.e Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency, S . Prior to the approval or issuances of any demolition# grading, Brad/or building permits, all facets of the project/ related to historic preservation shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Huntington Seach. 7. Prior to the isnuance of any demolition rarmits on adequate monitoring and/or bonding program shall bo established beatiI do the City Redevelopment Agency and property owners to ensure that demolition and construction vibration impacts do not adversely affect offsite structures . �3735d) -15-- 3. i , i "�{. Y•fti .,fir' r`Yv• 41 rw,.,.ti . ` s .5•a 1 „ w•* .;�r �f f ,, r u �.�N � 1;'�+ 'S'!II'Y , 'I ', ' "• ` � . �'+ „7 r,t• •I .rR .�f1• Y f;•u •�*N.ebr •,Iti 1 ''�"r. ,��:;r'K.YwMf+h,M'� :M*.,.• �, ',�,. .n,;Mi'1 n Y, to tho issuance of building permits, a detailed lighting ' be or by the Department of Com mni ty +i )dprr ' 't. plan $hall be consistent with the Downtown 41 .. 1" ice! lighting standards in the Downtown Design � , r�!.'ti•, :,a 1 n ' c , t r , , Ity 99Noah Sedevelopuient Avener shall be n!M ki por spa rsguid for enitis ss s �ta►re q V�f "`'"'� :°. t . of spaces lour trbioh► the J1pe Mill � � r �''r,'�`,��},^� omit bo based on ezinting legally couxtructed b s fbotse, to be ve rifted prior to issuance of building toow•. .,,�.,. 10 ftobertr coaxers shall provender do-site, parking orpry in-lieu fr�On for' #atonal square footage in accordance with the .;' approve, ftotdo grant 1progran. provision, for pant of fee:a r . '; . . wAst be solo' psio t to Issuance of building permits, in ac#ordanoe with the program. 11,0 As projects within the parking district, comprised of Downtown sific plan Districts: 3 and 5a, request development approval , tac yC shall contribute their "fair--share" towards redueinq the cumlwtiv* parking demand deficiency. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building perni;ts or certificate of occupancy, whichever comes first . The offsite packing spacers shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the now development. 12 Me precise plan of Street Alignment for Walnut Avenue between Iftin and Sixtb dtrosts shall be resolved and adopted by the ,, . . . Oity C01=11 prior to idsuans of building permits for now astrhation on the lots 'adjoining Walnut Avenue (201 Main Street, 422 Walnut Avenue, 202 riftu street) . s ;,`+. (17354) -1�- pop 400 yii {�'r Y"�, ., Y. e , • 'f� 4 �'�'Y1 der ti a; . � � � `,'} � N Yes > ,• ZXNZXlT e 9XVIROMs „ IMPACT IMPORT NO. e9-6 S'iATMXT OF OV22RID1913 CON51MAT1OH6 I y 44 ellNA 1 XnV1VQXO1GAt6X lmpaOt Report No. 09-4 for the proposed 11"; b1 4 MAziemua of 70,9glt square are feet of sized ubb � M=tsl t identif es certain unavoidable significant adverse t9fietts. CSgA duidellues Section 19093 requires the y 0 s�illi leer (VIOnAing Commission) to balance the bonefira of a 1 4l• pro' oct against unavoidable environmental risks in et6 rol.ning •whether the project should be approved. If the tsi ►n�la6 x ctvnoludes that the benefits of the project outweigh t ••uikfivOidhbl• *&verse eenvirerawMntal effects, the effects may be �` d�asi�ered �cceptablo. ftco, the City at Huntington peach eves find that the benefits fleecing to the City and its residents from the project outweigh the sionificant adverse eenviromwntal effects which remain after the roject ' s mitigation measures ax'e implemented. Primary among such � idexstiono 0re the elimination of blighted conditions existing, ib,,;tb* Nala-Vier Redevelopment Project Area, 971mination of seismic dofitioneieso and the project 's furtherance of the Downtown Specific i Plan and Cereal Coastrl Plan' s objeectivelo of increasing access to dQ6Rt4l' '460miti,ea and revitalizing the Downtown area . Another s Mor�,oat concidoration in the revenue that will result to the City i' tWlxedevalopment Agency from the project as a result of ifttossed ,ptoportr, value which revenues can be used to improve s+JrVJ4O cloveU, • construct capii;al facilities, provided additional ai'ft� i,Aalei- bomb r4 and for other important public purposes. %to filial Ita identifies two unavoidable adverse environmental impacts (sire Section 6 .3 in the Elp - Unavoidable V.gnificant A eio,;/b lrapaets) . These are: 1 . Increased light from new sources associated with the project , 3 . Project-specific and cumulative iMacts to the historical context# phirsical and architectural resources, proposed main Street Historic District, onsite historic resources, end .' gamlativre impacts to historic resources within the commiunity In hewer a 1 BoM6 of. these effects are lessened by the mitigation measures suggested in the $llt* which measures will be required ani Incorporated into the project . The reasons the City has determined that the remaining effects of each impact are acceptable, given offsetting project benefits , are discussed below. (3735d) -17- r r ; r'w l T f Op Ale ,/ • r . rr� p�ky � Y�1C.lir�a �x•.J{�•{{ P'" 'FL��� '� Iti Ih1)x.d41�•.� rY •� :1J i h I1 .•V1., . Jri . . :•II� 4*1 4) with the, Prdi aat .. '• ,'' Al� ■mow •i �iwr ;,.y# .r,l. .y�q •1 +.�.r a .,: �� .,n, . 49 q► V , . ll $' nareMs,o the amount of light generated on this site 9b cwrgontly *mists. Xew light sources are njoit gorraiai structures, street lighting, and f.q 4fit aq', seh$cb will be visible from adjacent areas and e tQ q 9el 6 ht s illumloation. Such lighting will be �r t r►a he ht of the buildings maximxe three :� •Jg g t at Ois to surrou ing uses# particularly those to the Force"two4 impact of this project will decrease over 0 .40 other major developments occur, this project will 1 T, *eut 081 . of the total light source. The adjacent multi-story -gz. .of .p#;kLsig structure, and the nearby Oier hav Mon project , for fil detract from the perceived impact of this site . ' �► an increase in light may have beneficial, effects , such ag a odt safety for motorists and pedestrians . The EIR identifies "Olgation moeeuras to lessen the impacts of lighting, which have boon incorporated into the conditions of approval . These include shielding Oad screening of light sources, in conformance with the Dowatown Design Guidelines . Qiven the many public: benefits of the project: as referenced above$ the City finds that the incremental increse, in light associated with G the project is acceptable. r•• �— .r*.1 eta T ache 4 At #worst; case, the project will include the demolition of all structures on the site, including 15 historic structures . The lose of those structures will have a significant adverse impact on the pbteoti*l Downtown Historic Dintric, on-site physical and architectural resources associated with the City' s history, and the cumulative stock of historic structures within the City. The Xfh has identified mitigation measures that will help lesson f ; these impacts, including complete documentat .on of the site to be Maintained for public review, and a program to ensure that construction vibration impacts do not affect offsite historic structures . r; The No Project alternative identified in the EIR is expected to have loss impact on historic structures than the Droposed project, however this alternative may not as effectively fulfill the important project objectives of revitalising the Main Street co=erciol corridor, enhancing the street scene downtown, and encouraging pedestrian traffic. Likewise, alternatives identified in the ZZE Ithot would prohibit 4emolition of existing structures would have loss impact on historic resources, but would not provide for re juvination of commercial uses along this block to the same extent an the project. These alternatives would not provide for as ���►��d� -18- I J �,v .N l;',��; ',<�YfM1�r .�J.1�+1'd 'f+:��. .�il+,�+�d.i�r4��kW,.Ak�';tt���d-.�til�r,r,�'.i`.e r. 'v_.'�Yr.L�•�ti,,�n y� Ito 9"t got dea►h PrevorkX amnr as the project* nor kdj for s higher rents sac ruimg to new buildings # as emek - �� +�!�t o AM1006e11ye 40 alternatives outlined y,,', r 1� ► ot the 41va0 envirenmentat effects as .Y of Na Am rho fir, tba city finds that the public y „;:�: : 1 : t: t ': v� ► i loot$ on 1140toria resources > , k,. :; :, ,+D�►. �e� b�r�ur its i luti retieion o! . �. 010 ht oxong the vital aomerciel core ; � �'�Owsttaet soene $n a roleage. with the � YI , ling#; both "of 'wbich will contribute to the. town The will a le o i 1 nt the c�tives e�' tfroject o awd►town specific and raocal r Will enscre tba elaminativn Of S*i0010 f�I 011 .iV r (3735d) ..lg� I 1 0 y I 1 , 7Jro r! Y y + 7 } 'w .W 6 {,.0 Y'n tin+� *7 \ Rr p, +;: M i ' a` 34 3=1811 C h•n''::� 319 F0=D TO 22 10$1001 T1CAM, MFnM MUND x0 BE ° . x`XD 7,A LAM OF INSMSFI a, AND SItiMIFICi1t'�'f XNVIRO TAL `= C*WM MA AV0If►AD IF TO PRaP052D PR=CT IS 1MpLMMTBD, 19M JJ28VXT TO SAID SFFSCTE, AND OF FACTS in Tz , ALL WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED C1MTxricATYOp aF AB F "p3 UWACT REPORT# CONDITION" U8$ PERMIT AND COASTAL .I DOMMIUM PWIT a OXHO 8TRAT I ON BLOCK (WESTERN 200 BLOCK OF MIX X WJNTIVQTOM 5ZACH, CALIFORNIA l The California Mnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA QUidelin►es promulgated pursuant thereto provide: "Mo public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an RIR has been completed which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for :each of those signifloant affects accompanied by a brief e:plana*ion of the rationale for each finding." (Section 15091., CECA Guidelines) , r' The possible findings are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant enviromental effect as identified in the Finax EIR. Hereafter referred to as finding 1. 3 . SuCh changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. Hereafter referred to as Finding R . 3 . Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final RrR. Hereafter referred to as Finding 3 . The City of Huntington Reach to considering approval of Conditional Use Permit No . 89- 2 and Coastal Development Permit No . 89-1. Because the proposed actions constitute a project under the CLQA Guidelines # the City of Huntington Beach has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) . This SIR has idertifie,d certain significant effects which may occur as a result of the project, or on a cumulative basis in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future proiects . Further, the City desires to approve this project and, after determining that the E19 in complete and has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and the Guidelines, the findings set forth herein are made: (37354) -•20- I Rt, CA , ��''f,•Py,,'Ri.3!K Tr, fr. ,trA9'„ '17Ai 7.'M'i', :aqryg{::.' vt •I �# ' '„ 'a;r�4 • 'm . , '•1 w; . . .. r M+ ", '. '•':... r ,, . .yJ. , • rt.,•., i�'uJ..l fi,r, , SIP A .Y1•. ;r, h ` of . amtington ftach prepared an Initial study to identify the „tom project which are arA $to not potentially' },.'..(1•',.I,.GIA>. .. ,., son which Were determined not to be significant tionallye land use impacts and some earth ro' loUed to be Josipetf scant to Xavironeental Impact Report ftea* •*o listed t►elowl ?,�'`d '`4I'h?'' �'•,},,`s�+�..�1�'�r.'f ,f" ,;�,'�, ,' i; Hunan Iti; V14e4 Life piak of Upset rA,1 I ,$481 Life population eats* neereation idclRr Aesthetics PDX a services Housingq project Generated Traffic utilities Land use Earth/Liquefactions Tsunamis s 1 a -E (373$d) ��i- If " 5 r,�r' M�•�' , I ���i r1 � *! '�;, 1r ,^4� I• ,r r., . ` 1f > �� Aq 51,+j. .• .f ... r� ( ,may,,, y ' `' � r ,"•r :Y, "M.4•Y,+' A Yfi`! ! �� 01 al:.IJA f�,.,,�, Vr�1 ',�•'a� s ��y �I}q�i i j , 1 h I i , for tho pro ect may be lnooaaiatant with the Mtoord MM a lighting design and a landsoa • plan for the M!► g � � �I�rJrll+cs ;i't$, "vo not been prepared Skid signago matey als have not been , oelMt7teQ ificont dffeat has been substantially 1e69es66 to the latent f0sib " 'b virtue of the following mitigation manures identified in thn f'ia#Y UVIVOnM911t,al impact Report and Incorporated into the project : 10 The Design Review Board shall review and approve all proposed 61tte rlor rao l f oat ions resulting from building a:ltzeer*00-0 tion, re habilitstfon, ,or facade imyrorement prior to approvel' of building permits , �It Asign -jorA. landscape plan shall be submitted to the Design Review ' Board andlor City Planning Department by each property owner ' .•.,:'; ,prior ��k ,,ep r�rel of building parrnita. The location and type of ali signs mall conform to they provisions of the Huntington Reach da: ib a Code &ad be consistent with the standards listed in 1"i9e. 3 of- '.the -nowntown Design guidelines. All lighting and landscaping matibrial,s shall elso be consistent with the g�u�,deliges. I'S IM City shall encourages and/or sponsor a planned sign program on +,` 1 both 41doe of gain Street. This program shall include possible I gfp,D #yArtiasti�onp City funded removal of existing signs, and ng { City i'utsdetl parchase and mounting of new signs . The City shall implement consistency of similar hardscape and I, landscope on both sides of Mtn Street . &LgmArlcant Effect d1 There is a+ potential for the architectural style of the proposed project to be incompatfblo with related projects in the futures downtown area. FAR rinding 1 (3735d) -xZ- ► - A► `fg t boa been substantially JosSened to the extent •4kte or the following mitt Skies SdNet�s identifled in p'4Paaasantsl lmpeot Report and incorporated into the project i ` ,;: ,.•� 'b Design Roview boor$ shell ensure that all srobitootur• within t xeeouorake elements of the stow 19aige 4e*- and -10 , o 1poorporste elements representative of the "' wctar ,b perica o ::bd structure under review prior to approval og bt Wing permits. 2 • A sign► sad landscape plan shall be submitted to the Design Xevi•w agora and/or city Planning DepartnaNnt by each property owner Vtt*r to approval of building permits , The looatio,n and type of all signs shall conform to the provisions of the Huntington Ordinaece Code and be consistent with the standsrds listed in page 33 of the Downtown .Design guidelines, All lighting and r: l8ra44cSP$%9 Materials Shall also be consistent with the • t�u�d�lines . , 3 . The City shall encourage and/or sponsor a planned sign program on < bath sides of Mein Street . This program shall include possible sign amortisation, City funded removal of existing signs, and City funded purch&se and mounting of new signs . a. The City shell implement consistency of similar hardscape and 16440cape on both sides of Main Street . i EARTH RESOURCES slant 9-12kat- Ifface N3 Implementation of the project may alter existing soils conditioner through potential construction/grading activities . i Finding l The significant effect has been substantially leseened to they extent feasible by virtue of the fallowing mitigation measures identified in the final. Environmental Impact Report and incorporated into the project ; 1 . For new construction, a detailed Boils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer prior to the issuance of grayling Permits . This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to proviie detailed reconnandatfons regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations , retaining walls, atreets and utilities . (3735d) -23- J1 •.1 1 1 hx• � 1 , r � r• 7 •1 (Ty r •"I�r 1 lRf, lr,lY+I y+FJ�1V / FTY y l A ��� ,r•;rJbYM,���! p�i a.•.,� � "'1f1,; i�"; �!,j� r :', , r. � ,w.. • f". r '''143-r , -�•,r, M � crost�roetion, a grading plan shall bpi submitted to tha fN. Ue works for veview and approvAl �r issuance ,,.. .of ftbits » Ian for gilt 06ntre for all r e at ' ,YF•'. s " frd t 0 Ocaporty luring construction and initial rp d of tbo project may be required if demourd necessary o re ator of f►ublic ftrks. / J`Sf y. rS pro sat sbd ipllgnsnt the following mitigation measure uA in •b►ovatow dpeaific plan FlR 82w3. }t +sadiag op the result* of soils studies conductet! for now dabeMtruction mitigating measures will be required to be T ' inaotporated Into the project. These measures my include but not limited tat baffars, special grading, special foundations , ppr; dubdrains, dowa'tering devices, and retaining walls . 'I The project liar in a ssismically active area which requires building formauce Nitta seismic standards. r :r, 1 Finding .1 The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent JO*$J a :bp virtu* of the Following mitigation measures identified in y' the' Final Nn#iroo Wntol Impact Report and incorporated into the project : c. All project applicants shall be required to complete seismic upgrades of existing structures in accordance with City of buntington peach Municipal Cade chapter 17. 16. hISTOUIC Meet as Dow1;r ifttob of all onsite historic buildings will eliminate the existing tiers the block provides to the recorded history of the City of 1 huntington !leach. a Finding 1 The significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report and incorporated into the project : t7�aa� -24- I h' skim 1yy,w� AWor to, tM issuance of demolition permits fit structures within jet are* (e:aopt Z12/224 fifth styrool the ilding owner shall offer him/hot structure, structures or aabu nt to the City of Huntington Deitch Mistrorical society , ? r o h►or &AtereRted parties) for the purpose of relocating the w tuc ure or MOSUMent and/or to fully 'Qocument and/or preserve pignif Want, erpbitecture 1 elements. The owner sha 1 I not incur :4 Wy: Boots- "Sociated with moving a;: documenting the structure or ► now owner eud/or n non-profit organization will boor the full coat of relocatioV the structure or monument. The 40MIttios postponement period will not exceed 45 days f coat the date of applications for derr,31ition. 2 . C-pfohbnsivo 40cumentatJon of the project site, as is currently exists # shall be preparrid prior to the issuance ox any building, 4radinv, and/or demtoli Lion permits . The documentation &hall be in acwcotdonce with standards established by the Historical cream Dui /dings Dui zvey/Historical Awricna Engineering Records ( ISM) . The report shall be arehivelhy maintained with provisiuss for public access . The costs associated with preparation and maintenance of the documentation shall be the responsibili.tl of the Huntington Beach Redevolopment Agency. 2 . prior to the approval or issuance of any demolition, grading, grid/or hu�.l in r it 11, d g pa rn e, a facets of the project related to historic preservation shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Nuatington $each, ianplomen tation of the proposed project may, adversely impact the structural stability of surrounding historic structures . Fi;a�$ictq 1 . Facts in„r1yg,2ort gi F'indi= The sigai.fica►nt effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasiblo by virtue ' of the following mitigation measures identified In the Final Ea►virone ntal Ympact-, Report and incorporated into the project: 1. prior to the issuance of any demolition permits an adequate monitoring and/or bonding program shall be established between the City Redevelopment Agency and property owners to ensure that demolition and construction vibration impacts do not adversely affect offaite structures. L ORT AND GLARE Sanifi_giant- =-jArt sZ replementation of the proposed project may increase the amount of glare in the area. (37353) -25- y 'T ¢ r r M '"" (r r �� ,? Id �:. � 1 °. ' f �• r qN \ �Ab4 •�y r 1 ,Ia + 11 t rs 8 TIC tkA A,,y i Gy, "(Y, ri y'rSC.' Jrl�(y p �f'•.l� IY^i •,�J�Kli „+,. , f l� }1, rtt',+• r, bh* beeb spblstanti,ally leeaeasead to kho extent 1 i Io"1�tg ea�+ti ati►oh ,�rasureaa Identified in y " 1 a1 dent ""' Ott * i/ncorporatod into the project � • qo 1l.ghting Is includod, hig�i-pressure ,sodium vapor lamps 6 t- Iintlar energy saving lamps shall tn used. All outsides /r 44gbi1hV pb►all be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent >r r properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations. ##Ib �6 "tto issua6dt of 3uilding Permits , a detailed lighting pl&1% shill to approved by the Department of Community i rvelopmont. The plan shall be consistent with the Downtown ghtift plan ani lighting standards in the Downtown Design �� p ►lt�� Masisoo bu,ilqot of the pr+b ect site will result in a total project r d4MAhd4hbrt6#4 of $39 par.king spaces. irinding l fte significant effect has been substantially lessened to the extent 9048' ible" virtue of the following "Mitigation measures identified in the Final L'aviror ntal Impact Report and incorporated into the project: 1. pared fear new commercial development projects within Districts 3 a ' shall be pioi ided on*ite to the maximum a:tent fessiblh. tht balance of any required parking shall bu provided harking facility within walking distance not to M feet . These offait+e parking spaced shall be in ,place prior to the Issuance of a nertificater of occupancy for the new development . 2 . Parking requirements for nonconforming users or structures may be :net by payment of an " in-lieu" fee for providing parking in parking facility. Said fee may be paid in two installments . The first installment in an amnunt established by City Council Resolution for each parking space shall be paid prior to the Issuance of building permits or of a certificate of occupancy, whichever cogs first . The second installment in an amount established by City Council Fesolution for each parking apace shall be paid at the time City and/car parking authority or District constructs a parking structure in the Downtown ,area . A survey in a aum equal to the second installment shall be fixed with the City at the time the first installment is paid . (373Sd) ,26- ,u i k� 1 .1' y •'I, 4r 'r r Ohio `41i��1�r 1• lea A°a r'i. t. 6,' fr ' fldtnt atgset has been oubstantiall Yeusefaed to the astent } Virtsil of the following mitigation areasures identified in *-Jn;JrowMntaJ impact Report and incorporated into the proJs►ot : , 1 , If oUtdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps r l r saving lams *hall be used . All outside o similar a r energy g p liobtift shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent pcopett es and shall bar noted on the site plan and el.evationa. prior to the issuance of building Permits* a detailed lighting lon Oall bea proved by the Department of Community � �'1Mlop�rdt , The plan shall be consistent with the Downtown li noting plan and lighting standards in the Downtown Design Miateif'cant feet ft 141L*imu*„bu11dqut of the project site will result in a total project s, �I�i�ab!gfta'a of 520 barking spaces . ,:. ri not no I toots U Bogart of li"UM The sigaillicaat effect has -been substantially lessened to the estont ,�;' • - feasible -by virtue of the following mitigation measures identified in the Penal 'fnVironrnantal rmpact Report and incorporated into the project : 1* pgriting for new commercial development projects within Districts {�j r 3 5a shall be provided onsite to the maximum extent fambible. Tho balance of any required parking shall be provided in a - public parking facility within walking distancenot to to $hp feet . These offsits parki-ag spaces $hall be in place prior to the issuance of a► certificate of occupancy for the nowj development. 2. Parking requirements for nonconforming uses or structures may be 7. not by papeaent of an "in-lieu" fee for providing parking in parking facility. Said fee may be paid in two instplIments. The llret installment in an amount established by City Council ,k Resolution for each parking apace shall be paid prior to the Issuance of building permits or of a certificates of occupancy, whichever comes first . The second installment in an amount established by City Council Resolution for each parking space schgll be paid at the time City and/or parking authority or Diartrict constructs a parki..g structure in the Downtown area. A survey in a sum equal to the second installment shall be filed with the City at the time the first installment is paid. --26-y r` •Iu r5 , S ( � I ti to City of Runtiagti'a Brach Redevelopment Agency shall be responsible for parking spaces required for existing square foe ergo. The nwo orr of spaces fox which the Agency will be ween-axw1blis shall be based ou existing legally constructed square f'� '•,.. 046hoe, to bo verified prict to issuance of building ermits, pcc i owners shall provi4e on-site parking or pray in-lfeu Poet Or d tionai square foots * is accordance with the appirovod �ec + � �treht program. . v1sion for payment of fees must be made 1 pre, *riot to issuence of building permits, in accordance with the significant 99 ffiet ft ''•� Cumlative packing shortages amount to 11835 parking spaces under the City code, and $51 under shared use parking . no Undia- Finding 1 The significant effect had been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitigation messuras identified in the Final Ravironmental: Impact Report and incorporated into :she project: I 1.b Parking for new co mercia l development project within Districts 3 -and 5e at-all ba provided onaite to the maxlmum extent feasiblo. ;... „ Th* balance of any required parking shall he gxovfded in a publ.ia parkliq facility witchln walking distance not to exceed 350 feat. Those offsite parking spaces shall be in place prior tc the issuance of a certifL.ite oZ occupancy for the now development . 2 . As projects nrithin . the parking district, comprised of Downtown Specific plan Districts 3 end 5a►, Yequest development approvel. o they shall contribute their "fair--shave" towards reducing they cumulative parking demand deficiency. Fees shall be laid prior to Issuance of building permits or certificate. vx occupancy, which6vor ootaers first. The offoLte parkiri4 space shall be in place p-Aor to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for the now doT614M86t. 1 I (37356) -27- �,�' � "',; 'p'�r .!.'W •�^��I�rY'�'I�N"r J./.{'�����'��I„������.^ V .1,•M'' ���� r 1•. •'.'1 •.w'�''''i."•I'� A.1�•, � � r �� • ` •, '' •�� � r'�• :'��,+ + yvs(�77 �y^e�I 7 I r r Y�rj,.r a I 1Y �• ryy�'+„ o• r 'Y S4'4 rfS� ✓ f' r �' � � � �``�_k-1Y'�F.rri ..'!,r���#.{Itl � 'A'� ,1 T r� � ��1 'p -� �f � ',; w .,, �—jI Tl.�`rr 1��, r , .� i., *�.� r I'�• r.. � „w ai � ��i 7R` � a 11 �' {.y;�'� �{� ,,/i,1��{ ,b �'S,}; r4i�.r r�• ��� .�'� � � � '• " r,� "w� �� � r `' 1�� •� "¢fir, oIF JAM. Aid � .•! f4111 %'8rui:ralwlla. 'n;•V•:r+' r .99 onsite historic buildings ( location, setting, feeling, 9 dt o,S) in relationship to the downtown area will ba Frith the demolition of onsite historic buildin i . r r qR► gone 60 Nhiah Can Mi.tigOtO the impact to the Integrity of ' b' t xic ilbif • It the Structures are demolished. 4 - +e demo 1 i h w y,yto.�?��^irj',4�.1�`�"'r', df�',"''x�o•���i�'lo,r►iex`�n',:;;, :�;� I 4;#* .fit may result in the demolition of nine bfuildin4S which were 44 to hM important Physical roaources to Y the City's history. n'�11"lyt� } ' can mi t iget •16 is pact to 'iroport ant *10SOUMOS it the structures arb demolished. Mont ft `�t7i'•i�'..�,j�,r �w�i�i�4 (`(•'�r'p'"�}�a��w�1'�'�y���Zy. ��, 'i f�� � � � � � ��,1 g�q� �I%j�•'y,;l; Zhxeou it ift ,the demliti•on of four arob�.teaturaliy M h+'1 t' i r p' ?" A+`��fix. } tr r,'4� �u '� I� �; „��� •�� �.,r. / r . ' � o rd1 + r ,�, "�•,',i:. 1�„� "� � i;� '�'A;��, �Y .i.' •"r` .''" ,1 d Jd ,/' �} ; ��r, {I• !r , l4 /.i � p 1 - •�I�.� ,}-Y ': � t' ��. r � 4 r P�a '1�, +'P• '. ,1 y +fir'y�� .'y°�1P,4 4 ,`r.�'Iflyr�.� k i�F ,;,','S,• rr. ��� .;�y r_� ,w _�l'+ i 31 , 20 r .,,'r. Y -Qm "��>R/�: ' � ^ �i'.�IM' �i ,, fly^M„ •i�. 'NI k+� ,�I{`' , ,1'4 74 �r?lt r �./,d �'�r ��, '+� ,�:, � ,1• �I y t'r r goo Mitiveltre thO Impact to Pout demo 944tiosat stsucturor it t..a staru to • # li.rh . � . I .ALII L if ' r '4: *6 6606ift historic distr�.ota Atatus 067 ooc�ur der to the loss r' ►ldinqu and the diminished integrity Of the dcwntcwn area . A. k. impact to the ability to x ilk me urwia r i► Can aritigrtm the taws !�! t� r ,' st u�turea aat* demol�.shed. districts s ,rn�`v� may result in the elimination of onsite historic W. 21117•ri 1r 4 'sr' i•.r' "' i • agures which. Jan mitigate the impact of elimination Of � if the structures are dewliuhed. ,� �} �; .r•L:ii � + p J*ot -will incrrr"ntally c:oritriLrute to the reduction of it••,' ',, .ie the City at Huntiagt*n Diswi1 +r A•�1 jt L s") RAM• �`��:,��F 1. ,''fiI'� . . , ' , ._7 , - , Y 1 .0 Y, . '4' 1. 1, .' A , • +" ` ' . ` I /1fi,tAJti ray t ! !t , V .•11• ! T ! lF'�1 4 N w y '. Mf• � d, 'T'i. � Imo., �, I } , .' "•..t P' . w tr.� ''A . „ '`r :,r�/, ., •j y. *` . Sr,' h;,�, + 1���,7"'}*`"t�f, 4' 1y Y v �. MYr`•br A.,.�n :a � '��• 'rd�Yi4}a >`ti?;�:1.,,' .;. . '7 . •{d - 'Y�•�' �� O which can mitigate the ruction at historic !� ' 67 o! n n seat ructurMs acs . . ° �� I�unti qtq h if the st r !f FW& 47 '' r . Ors► t �oili oontribUte to the reduction of historic r ti ras on a ►ty-owi der basis . 1 , !I' f x ,s oaturea which can c�itigate the ri�lrectl.aa of historic a County-wide, basis it tree : st rudtu reel ire deemo l i sbsd. 1„ I CA I'Mm 4 9 ��o�jaot will increase the night lighting in the downtown area. 1 poo.IT ern* . i110ant effect has been lessened to the extent feasible by i tht mellowing mitigation measures identified in the Final r, act Report axe! fnaar rate+ll into the Project : of o,, lm po po F „x�, '.1 • ., Y�,�. Ot a the isshande of Building Permits# a det*lle�►d lighting WI** shall he approved by the Deportment of COMMnity 1apient. The plan shall be Consistent with the Downtown 11 htJn2 plan and lighting standards in the Downtown Design g s►ird na mitigation masures that can fully mitigate the CuMlative increase in light sources if the project in approved. -30- 1. r:k' �n�t�yyn,Sr' �., � � rye , , a n `f - � '.,i"4;• fi� r , ti tlrr'••J1iw� :4• � ti,_ �,���k T,�'�ir'+f� �,1f�.;,9�{ . �.. ' ;'� :L !{I .•.�, t•<i..P3i1WT� , YC ra k, errfWOO Slt*ZA*tiV*l for the pcop0806 DONNOMUStion foot i been refined during the course of the public 1 series of actions including but not limitod to those ,k , Oboird 4060ti rogras has been prepared and analyzed in a 0mof so as to ptovide for the greatest public involvenwat in XI r', � ,' <<.;�� :'�"►� ` s i11'�'!s ' ' ° i *3th tll�M �►rl�g '1�11 uri�lcer oeleS+l�b hhe •„ ,,, .:. :,, �.�:� + � taps atir�e 446, Issued and the draft 2I2 was ,gfe ared. 61itigation aeures and Standard Citif Policies and ' MO havh 160e1, made a part of theto pa+t . Y,; `b ' # ''''pi f►�►S la a beef desel rl ptios► of the ptole at att t the alternative* crate re acted in favor of the current V J sad. . The rationale for re ection of each alternative is K< rr a•' ,' yre ect 4lternative assumes that CUP too. 89-1 and C,DP No . 89-1 iopleftated« under this alternative, property owners �,� ;.,,;;,: h� ,-111 ,o"d -to inarewate sqaare footage an their property nor ` iiatotic attuctures. The alternative would allow for the *16A .'of -existing structures and the distribution of funds to 1 t Property 4wr#a►rx four facade improvetments subject to their - :-��th keloniic and building code requirements. With t' on' e►t the ft Project Alternative, existing structures would h. ii�' thoft oxistin condition, be improved indet endently by � a► ,;r, ,`;, Otis, or be improved as part of the Facade Grant Program. QPacific edonoaeic, soctalo or other conasderations make ,4 ; . '' trr 'east•s Po Piroject Alternative identified in the Final ft.:'',ti+ . #e ftribed abov's in that s 16 kojbnt Alterasti doib not as effectively implam"At 4 btant '"ald of• the Kuutington Beach generral Flare, the ppeaitits PlAns or he 'Down owh Design t t n Guidelines . These i' tad enbane t of the vitality of Main Street as a a6iwerolal , core and pedestrian link between upper stain Street and tho Pier, improved aesthetics in the coastal cone, effactive, MOMing of historic and Mediterranean architectural styles, and ,'frtionrl use of land for effective retail and offics' wpeco. gli Y{ JV7N . !,`.,,•, . 1 " y�,,.�r+ y, , ,� �.Y,,, �' �H7i'., 'r���,�* '4r•;,�In':`,`�'r�° �.r.�1,�yh''..'� yh' '' .:*• •'1''?�F�'h +M1•!!� aim '. �7 •"'ij' rt"f 1" iceptable It ot• a 0 preferredetc es�t when " ; fnAtfacts met forth in' t�e statement of Overriding a o»S and stated above* and ore more acceptable than tht►se siui at9d f r*0 the NO Project Alternative. fte No Pwaolition Alternative assumes that additional square footage COb'141 be added to the Demonstration Block without demolishing any of the existing h#stoyrlcal structures . 11i s - itl�A e ocoaotsid, social or other considerations make n� 1da Flo the prolect ' s No Demolition/Increased Square Footage 4ye identified is the Final EIR and described above in that: The Sd Deimlition Alternative does not as effectively implement �rtant goals of the Huntington Beach General Plan, the town' S ocific Plan, or the Downtowns Design Guidelines. These include efficient use of land for retail and office spaco as ��►lled far in the Downtown Sppecific Plan District S . and ' effective blending of historic and Mediterranean architecture. dL 41ficsat effects of the preferred project are acceptable wben b$ mood a sinst facts set forth in the Statement of Overriding c6asidiorations and stated above, and are more acceptable than those r anticipated from the No Demolition/Increased Square Footage Alternatives. s alternative assumes that all properties already developed on the VioJett block would only be allowed to be rehabilitated without idolfing additional square *dotage. The five: remaining parcels would �0 allowed to develop at a 1.0 FAR• a ratio approximating existing deVeiopment within the .dock. rl n4tan 8 - Specific economic, social , at other Considerations make fe* the project ' s Reduced Intensity/Infill Alternative identffble iod W the Final NXR and described above in that: The Reduced Intensity/Infill Alternative does not as effectively �•i idtont important goals of the Huntington Beach General Man, or the Downtown Specific plan. Reduced intensity does not privide for as effective use of available land for retail anA office use, decreasing the effectiveness of Main Street as a vital commercial core. Significant effects of the preferred project are acceptable when balanced against facts set forth to the Statement of Uverriding Conxi.derations and stated above, and are more acceptable than those anticipeted from the Reduced Intensity/Infill Alternative. (3735d) �32-- d . , ' 1•, , ' M • �� ,,its=-' , • , ��' � ►. !/ r 4 tip ,� ` 1 r, ,� °�", r r r,� yy �'fir r, ' i r'4'r W ' d+• p,/ ,a.fWr•, .Jkpk�l nL,ri' :err.1' ^w " i•1 •.h ; .: * ... , �. s , :k: RA# `':;.�K��•;•. • �� ah de�rlr�nt o1hA111111ty lopes 'ill, •. � 1J, •t� PORT--I piannins comission , �. •�t �swruriit8r it►glont w• ' ' '"ptember lot 1980 . �` +CpRDi'� 0. .PW1V NO. 89-1 WITH SPECIAL PMWITB, v��t -�. - + • ,� , ,.,.; 1� �. d 8 l, mIRb38MMAL x T 88-4 _ City of Huntington Beach Rodev,010psent Agency January S, 19a9 various (see attached N&M=BY kj=S1qTNQ t3 : list) January 5 , 1990 12000: To permit up to 70, 726 Z=: tiosntoWn Specf f is sq.ft. of mixed use develop. Plan District 5 (Mixed taint on one Ci.t block, use - Commercial/Office/ in accurdanee w�th the Residential) the Downtowns Rpe0lfic Plan. r.. The proposed special .RAL per: Mixed Use - permits are to allow: Office/Residential) 1) 0 ft . setback on Walnut ,lore. in 110 of 5 ft. ; : Various - n ft . build-to-Line or Retail , Office, Residential Alain St . In- lieu of s ft . ; y End 3) structures up to ir -1►0PI011: City block bounded SO 'ft . in height within by Main Streetr walnut 25 ft . of the ^ Main Street Avenue, Fifth Street and right-of--+way in list: ' of. a Olive Avenue. ma ti.two of 25 ft. in height. Approximately 3 &dreg total : PAW EA4 Certify sr adequate Environmental Impact Report Ho * 80:-4 ty adopting Planning Contuission Resolution No. 1419 (with "+,• �.� :,;�.� ; ,,, 04ot~ t. of Oveg riding Considerations) ; o Approve Coastal Devolopomt Peridt No. 89--1 with findings; and ►rove Conditional Use, Pemir go. 89-1 with Special Permits Mirth findings and conditions of approval . A•fM IM fir M•+. ' �, %,a. r �e 1 � I r r,44e(.•�rt 11� r,� 4 V :o rV rR'4' •`( 4°'° ,I, •..�, +, M { C044tional Use Permit No . 69-1 with 8p ecial permits and Coastal ftwolop"fit Permit No. 89-1 constitute a :request to allow up to 70#Tgi square feet of raised use developmeut on one City block bounded br ia Meet# Walnut Avenue, Fifth Street and Olive Avenue. New squ*re footage may occur on an owner-by-owner basis under one of two ti s 1) feCade improvement of existing buildings in conjunction 1110"I h • eddit ons up to the maximum square footage permitted under fteelfle Plan; or 2) doarol.ition of existing structures titer ef.• n*w buildings up to the maximum square footage M*or erbst Dawntowr� Specific plan. This conditional use t 6hd caastal development p permit are intended to serve as the postser entitlements for all now square footage on the block. Each W699e,;ty moor way elect a building option pursuant to this action, of alterastiVely, choose either no action or .facade rehabilitation lY (no *Atitleraent required) . Any exterior alteration, whether 00 440 work- or new construction, will require final approval by the besign Review Board. The proposed special permits are as follows : 1. To allow a zero foot setback on walnut Avenue in lieu of 5 feet, ' f. To allow a sero foot build-to-line on Mein Street in lieu of ,,.. 5 foot, ` 3. Te allow structures up to 10 feet in height within 25 :zit of . tho Min Street right-of-way in lieu of the maximum oL 25 feet In height ., ft"bl s►�,d U81h .0LAWACt Protdert�: PW 10HATION: Minted Use - Office/Residential Downtown Specific Platt-District 5 , (Mixed Use - Commercial/Office/ Residential) U46 USX: 'Various retail , office, residential ,.; PL N 088I MIATION: Minted Use Office/Rasidentiai t Downtown Specific plant-District 5 (Mixed Use - Cosmere i a 1/Off.ice/ Residential) b USA: Retail , perking structure under construction! OWE Report - 0/19/69 -2- (3612d) SFr td4rt•: •.\ ISM M� !r" ' 411. `:;' liSxA►7t �M: Visitor searing Commercial Downtown specific Plan-Vistrict 3 (Visitor Serving Commercial) Win ,« V& ions retail, office, residerntiaael TIT Mei �1 tb Cal.ifcraais snvi ronmental Quality Act, ihftport kc. 89-4 (SIR bo . 89-4) was prepared to impacts of the project . The requisite N taw a t_ti Ala o l x oxed is outlined be l i�-W 3 Stpfi aoucted an initial, study and determined 4;,1ati .that an AIR would be necessary for the project . n Itotice of Preparation was filed with the State Clearinghouse to notify public of intent to prepare sin X1R. AAMMOt .r ; ,149 Notica of Completion filed with the State Cloari:nghouse. Draft RIX available for public review and co=mont for thirty days (Coax ont period: August 8, 1989 , to September 7, 1989) . lark . f#ir',23, 1939 Public hef�rinq before Planning Commission to certify XZR No. 89-4. StN►ff- boa sponded to all comments received, sand this attachment V:1 l ed 9s an appending in the Pirnal Elk, UoOMM*pj Imoset Report No, 89-4 was prepared any $TX, inc. The f i be adapted and certified by the Planning Commiaxion 8gtipn on Conditional Use hermit Mo. , 89- 2 with special 9t bove lopoftt V volt No. S9-1. The environmental � � .• d dss poOntial adverse imp4ttti 3n the areas of �� b �tl►, 8 othetict, 'eartb resources, historic tcgv# ' 014q, and light and 91,are. The direct, indirect and OUVO , specter of the proposal are addressed, as are the impacts c75 : ",Use.,off at* mitigation Measures identified in the { . Jority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with ,"pf t ; can bo Mitigated to a level of Insignificance. There � V,•4 . 1roject ; . so" savetid Mvi,ronmental impacts anticipated from that cannot be completely eliminated through r•4:oitlon sores . These include impacts from now light sources Mist* with - the project, and both project-specific and iftit►er 116paots to the historical resources of Huntington Beach. a stfects can be lessened by mitigation measures suggested in e►nvieroamotal impact report, and staff recommends theses be ►tporated into the project , }eft import 9/1!/S9 -3- (3613d) 1i 'M r r •.• NI:WIL ur \ . i :h:aMj lb a' •.� .. r `y .•�.y'►► .�' �.Jyl� r%r•'q / .r•+ .,• F ' ''`.�►, /t1'':,'. �11fa: Y�•j; .,�Yr}.hlYl..,'1 wall •�fN "\ .' r:A ' r 1f1i h r, ,t IthOtAI xig the adoption and implementation of the reecoMoonded ' ;ion miaurea, approval of the project requires that a rt of Ovo rwiding Considerations be adopted by the planning goleug liotling that the sconosaic and social benefits of the 109606; to1eect outweigh its potentially adverse impacts* prior to of ;ion atd, ado tion of the ZiR by resolution, the planning D�. 9s 0 ,"Mwp they document. It should be noted, however, t d.t VAI of 'any of the recommended mitigation measures will �'" � �;�'�•� `� .� .jgst*fication. eaject is within a non appealable portion of the . C�►avral, %One. Prigr to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. Y WJJ A%%: 40 necessary for the planning Commission to review and act f' ftve10pMnt permit No . 89-1 . The proposed project will 4 erNr ►h 1: following policies of the Coastal Element of the ' 6to ' 'Plan: p . protect, encourage and, where feasible, provide visitor- .parVi `facilities in the Coasted Zone that cre varied in , :', ,ty' and price. Improve the eappearence of visually degraded areas . 's ftostel 'bovelopmont: permit No . 39-1 may be approved or conditionally ; app ►veld onl7 often it has bean found to be in conformance with the eetai h14*Mt tyy making the following findings: It's) laud ."as ''la. That the development project proposed by the coastal 'dovelopment permit 'application coafiforms with the plans, policies, requirements and rtand6rds of the ". coastal pleuaesar y mat• That the coastal development permit y tion ' s" consistent with the CZ suf fin, the base .*"ins( district, or spodific plan as wall as other `4 proVisioes of the buntingtoo Dosch Ordinances Code +8pplicablo to the property; ,r;' tell q AWr4 2■, That at the time of occupancy the ': pr6#fte4 deavelopsOnt can be pr6tldsd with irif restructure `+r in * '**after that le consistent with C-LUP; :xCAlilatSIA.,. +e hat . That the development conforms y: with the public eocess and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . aTA=t `,#he pa~bposead project ii located in the gain-pier Redevelopment p90e0t Ace& . The City of Huntington Reach Redevelopment Agency is the Npplicant for the project . # Report - 9f19/99 1 41 0��4 +h 9r �,,3 ,0�`�,.P3 �,�j�K '1 ��"1h7,3i'� �• rlr� c= ,;+''sJc r'.�"�rR" 6t , r' it , i s it r s unft rlel of the DvWAtoan sgecif iQ Plan, �b itf�r Co rcial/officu/tasidential) . All ; �► itd must comply with the steridards of the DowntoWn r• k104 no aslt special permits that are granted 66 Not Applicible i &1 Permit Ifo. e9-1. with special Permits and coastal ersrtt No. OP-le as described in Section 2 . 0 abowre, "Ste Redevelo"Week Agency to iswolownt a Portion of the t pvovr*m. The Pro g ran w o* approved by the City Council 42 ` . 1988 aad rovidess rant ' funds to property Downers rpoomonts on this block, subject to compliance with 1141144 codk k6quir asnts, Downtow n Design Guidellneop o roquir nts . 9'inancial assistance will also be x 'the• Proptam to prdperty owners who wish to add squats ,t noting buildings or to construct now bui ldinga, at the QVided for facade Improvements . The Program requires property owner to enter into an Owner Participation funds ars allocated according to they number of linear ew . ldisg facade itti'i+rsArI iihcentive to participate in the program, parking s etg are G*emO not for all existing square footage, and for rue ti.on up to the square footage that currently exists. i r. aiotR wba wish to build additional. squats footage, either ► writh �roh4bi 1•Itation or now constrmct ion, parking for # bass Ms`460 most be provi►dod or ash In , lion fee paid. T'ho i tf" s ublic improvowriks '05 a sepera►t project , � t�e "f � `tgb� �titaiton prt��rasi. �'hsese wf 11 ncla►de . ," tilitiosh reparint send lighting in� the alley, sand w rill l di IM 0e' all asauua E w worst case scen,a rio, , s.ii•' Oidperty bvd44rs Eft the block,- wi l 1 ckoose to demo 1 i sh tructures. and reconstruct riew buildings to the maximum T' e, t raitted the Downtown Specific Plan. Cursentlyf Pptaoi� alp ;iaaisel�* 5h2 square fit of bui iding S ) t • tMtreat lot config urotion ' 0 . 062ter' �►in • 1 Pr iW.0 t100T area ratio of 1 .5; and 3) two 25-foot 16 "r'. wi l roftsin vaceAt to serve as pedestrian accessways, the b6i,1 out for the block is approainately 124,009 square feet, ifter4alle of 700126 tsquaro feet over the existing area. .r Report - 9/19/69 �d- �mSlfd) i5;4 sum 'a M„ f � to bll likslihood# however, this maximum buiidout will not be Oeverel property owners on the block have already been RytGor for fecade reMbilitatic�n only on esisting buildings, with expansion. These include 205 Bain Street , 213 Main . t, 115 Main Street , and 210 Fifth Street. in addition, the ld ing b#allding at 411 olive is Currently being rehabilitated to #e to## temporary location ra of the Surf xus*u , and the Shank Mt Vifth Stroot let ,bring rehabilitated for office Use y4rs� guid*21nes for historic structures . Assuming the .., ' t16i4 stru0tures do not request o:pansion under this Ist, the "ziam not increase in s4uar• footage over they `i" lb oc is reduced from 70, 72Z squats fast to approximately 47 466�. eguaree foot . i ` ,fit ' 'ia ►else rehabilitation and new construction within the project 44+s will , be subject to Compliance with the Downtowns Design r1$se8 and DesiOn Review Board approval . Staff in recommending 400ditton of approval that nave buildings and rennovations T4to architectural elements of historic buildings previously �._ te, or of historic buildings in the vicinity. This D't would be similar to that imposed on the 200 black '#4tk$u0 structure across Main Strest, to ensure that now 'ruption will blend more harmoniously with the surrounding Sy ' int6grating Mediterranean elements of the Downtown Design X . 14olin ear w,iith historical elements, the architectural style of the ' > f11 compatible with cold and new development in the area . 49-4 identified fifteen historic structures on the block. 611 buildings on the block except 222/224 Fifth Street, �# i6onstructed in 1944 . The 1988 Johnson-Haumann Report for the dity classified the Shank House at 202 Fifth Street 1411y eligible for individual listing on the National An additional ton buildings on the block were classified 4 i tlal' oontributors to a Main Street Historic District. Five 0 sad *ti listed, as non -contributors . Detailed descriptions of the sn�brbe ogre contained In Section 3 . 3 of Bra No. 89-4 . *6' r assumes a worst base scenario for purposes of snalysis, *00 �` t4 t all structures will be removed. (However, as Hated iboie:, it appe:arc unlikely that all buildings will be demolished . ) 1 Ah co►n, cludeeu that under worst case, the project will have a Sivalt'tcant project-specific impact on the recorded history, historical context, physical and architectural resources of the Gigs, the potitntial for a Main Street Historic Vistrict , and on-site historic resources . It will alsu incrementally add to cumulei.ve adverse impacts on historic resources in the community as fewer buildings ass left In the overall stock. These impacts cannot be seduced to a level of insignificance, Theerefor$, should the Planning Commission approve the project , they must first adopt a bt+aket►nt of overriding Considerations . fitsff report -• 9lig/09 -6 - (361�d� Yli M i '4; t w ,ti tt S w i, • fill ddk' i ... ".'. '.,`�K,�h .'f 'i '_ 1b�.rTr�,�r `•��'r b,i•rh a�•iy,,,�: •i7i'• EiP.li+.4''; ,.., ■ ,�,. k,r' a ',•�' �' 9 ' MO t� potential to inaroase the amount of Might '' 66*1hrell to current development # and to add to genral � 41UNInation. NIR No. 89-4 bas identi.f ied this as a -! gostso impact . mitigation measurers have, been •, ' o ditioas of approval to reduce the iarpacts* " 06tr "bast be iridudod to a level of insignifencs. I9m14 the P1*=Ing Vciaolsalon wI;:h to appxove the 4i l l first need to adopt a Stotemint of Overriding specif is plan requires that parking for uses within be provided on site to the maxim m extent feasible. The ab 'required parking must be provided in a public parking with a aralking distonos not to exceed 350 feet. tng spaces currently an the block do not Wrest the .': *rated demand of 274 spaces, The wavat case analysis In Mot S. . 4 a8sumas that all parcels will develop to the maximum iittl oil fiaft#blo, eliminating all parking on site. This in possible , through the facade program, parking requirements for 1:aelopwntb are deemed met, and additional required spaces Ilet'406t , through pent of in-lieu fees . If this occurs, there '• b a shortfall of 929 spaces on the black. ``' T'°' i�p ►` 'PACK mg on the first three blocks along Main Street in shared stticts, any shortfall associated with one project must be cumulativax basis, to account for divergent needs ,different uses . EIR No . d9�-4 contains a parking studylist the City analysing parking supply and demand in t :' ► friate a aAd 5t ' base►d on ozisti.ng and projected uses . ed that# despite a current shortfall under existing M r.ir�r�l� i t► � ,'the impact of this project and future dievelonroent can be prough oats of in-lieu fees to construct off-sito ' suggested witigstion measures have been included as as of approval. A49 dpeci al Persons are requested in conjunction with 01*00861 use Permit ISO. 89-1: !!I # ' To allow sego foot setback on Walnut Avenue in lieu of a �1 fort setback. This request is made to allow buildings *doing Walnut Avenue to maintain their existing setbacks. Since lot consolidation is unlikely under this program of individual patticipation, a 9 foot setback would result in too :email s buildable lot area . A zero foot setback will provide a logical extension of exinting setbacks on Fifth and Main, and will encourage new and upgraded development at this interface with Main-pier phase II . State Report - 9t19/89 -7- (36126) 1 r. 110 142 64" ft illoW a Moro loot build-to line on Maier Btreat in liou N fife toot build-to line. This Sp*cial Permit is f *stod because now construction along M*in shriek will be required to dedicate 4 feet for atrear purposes . The requiremat to mov* now buildings back an additional 9 toot �O 04 build-to line wou14 result in now buildings tat. r 9 Net Earth*r back from existing structures that may be 'litat*d.. A zero foot build-to lime after the four *Odicatloft will allow coeitinuod visibility for now ft 411ow buildings up to 30 feat in height within 25 feet of• „rho Main Street right-of-war in lieu of a maximum of 25 ih height, The Downtown Specific plan requires ,that t '~ ell pgstionx of buildings over 25 foot in height be aft fout f roa the Main Street right--of--way« Howevar r , pr4orty owners rho wish to construct now retail bui idingu with offices on the second floor have indicated that up to feet in height may be required to achieve appropriate } 11140V heights Wherefore, staff is recosaa*nding that a ti6ik of 30 feet in height be permitted within 25 foot of subject to review and approval by the t)esign ` it S"bill '"' natal! that individual property ewners may take Oval* Is q!t any or all Specs%al Prmits granted, depending on the _0I Otoh development. 1 i r $tatf,,Fsegamads that the Planning Commission: 1t. get ga#d oa��rtify as adequate Envi�rormahtsl Xa�pacL Report Mo. G b •adoptieg Planniftq Commission Resolution ro. 1419 (with Wout, of Overridiflg Considerations) ; ►ire dra9iital Development. Permit no. 89-1 with the following : ndufls: and C. . ,�, ►�► *e Cor+Aitional Use Petmit No. 99-1 with Special permits the following findings and conditions of approval . NMM&__ OMITIOM ERSATZ as-ill 10 rantino of Condittonal Did Permit no, 89-1 for up to f 104, 726 square foot of mixed use development wi11 implement the General Plan of the City of Huntington (leach, the Downtown Spft,iific plan: and the Downtown Design Guidelines . 1. The location, site layout , and design of the structures on the rehabilitation block will properly adapt them to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner, because final design of each rennovated or reconstructed building will be subject to Design Review Board approval . 'Oteff Report - 9r19r89 -er- (3612d) =WWJ I 4 YAp a , ���:` `,`�+' �,J '' Ain• !� ' ! r 17 a to andl pa kiaq for the ropos rohah►i a it+at'�cars/new = r lbti . apt d�Coate an u un parking probloa, because 41p res will imps nted requiring pa a.t of oonat of off-mite spaces . 04 1 .. ts''O.s to 01 otter livinv i ice. t � ►6 lie p�otl r jai r+ qts t. 1140 0posht of colarrdl'ai kid office `W the 's wa r 0 are Ccxrpaiible, with the !!;` *Oko, i0t " do�utch qa Walnut 4venue ih lieu of 5 feet j kit bill can grin street in lieu of 5 feet; t . .$t*uctupop up to 30 fret in height within 25 feet of the F it Atri"t •tight-of-may in lien of a i6ximum ci 29 feet in ris►1'glkt 2. .. �r l Oi s060141 petitits pt6vide for Maxigm use of p�it .�Cdll l��sinq tea of architedtu�re, �losir�n and .. t, . g6$tod ipecial permits will not be 'de'trimental to the VWPqR r, -hdaith, welfare, safety and convanieace, nor 1 or Wurinas to the value of property or oto of t!se rsiphorhaoc! or of the City in general * r w ea serial peraftr tars 6on,iietent wit1 h tho +off ad *a of thu, ~nto m Upecifie P'',nn standards to achieving i dv „ ,Og�ut oclapted to the surrouLdisig built envir6nmerit and 'th proposed dpvolop nt in the am . 1/0'o 136 44Nata toot Mixed uta dove la t 'conforrs '! TAMO. . 011141,,eq,�� rip di Item" d and at er►da f+dB of the +60 � Bch ,�Cear.��1 91i At .of the General p11ui. 1 . j Oikwg AkA61ftV416pient perait no. 09-1 in consistent with the CZ , 48*§� Aoaa) quf fli , tt p Downtown Bpeci f is Plan, Lind ,:. ,,:; •,:':` iM1 of t he' ht.iripton each oedirea.rice Code applicable to OW proVorty. 30, sit the 'tiow of Ob.cupabOy. the proposed •70,T36 square font is"I,�Owftt sari be provided with inf raatructure in a '�r that is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal nt ana Coastal Land Use Plat► of the General Plan, 1 9opasti 9,�19JB9 � � (3613d) d . Tile propc •:^id 70 , 726 squere3 foot :%tized-usle development cunforn',s Ath the k ublic, acc;e as and public recreation policies of Chaptor 3 ',f the California Coastal Act , 1 . The site Flan, floor plasrs , and elevations for each proposed addition , altoration, or now building shall he subject to the standards of the Downtown Specific Platt, the conditions of this Coadi tional Use Permit and the Special Permits herein, and shall be subject to approval by the Design Review board , *2 . Prior to thfi issuance :f any demolition permits an adequate mor_itorirg Bind/or bonding pirogrant shall be established between the City Redevelopment Agency rnd property owners to ensure that demolition and construction vibration impacts do not adversely affect vffsite stsructuves . 3 . rr4.or to submittal for building permits , the applicant/cwner shall complete the following : a . Floor plans shall depict natural glass and 220V electrical I( stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers ; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking I facilities, water heaters , and central beating units ; and low-volume hegdn shall be used on all spigots and ;cater faucets . b. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall he installed as approved by the Building Department Bind indicated or. the floor plans . o . Elevations shall da;pict colors and building materials proposed . d . All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view of public rights-of-way. Said screening sh&ll be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If. screening in not designed apecifically into the building , a rooftop mechanical equipment plan roust be, submitted sbowing screening and must be approved. 1 *e. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a detailed lighting plan shall be approved by the Department of Commursity Develcpmant . The plan shall be conslotaent with the Downtown sighting plan and lighting sstinde rds in the Downtown Design Guideline& . sgarlironmental Mitigation Measure stot 116port - 911916! -lq- (3612d) *f . Where determined necessary by the Depertmentes of Building and Public Works , a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Boils Engineer . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommeyndatir ns regarding gradAng, chemical and fill properties , foundational retaining walls , streets, an3 utilities . Depending on the results of Boils studies conducted for new construction mitigating measures will be required to be incorporated into the project . °Th6ssee measures may include but not limited to : buffer , special grading , special foundations , sesbdrains , de water;ng devices, and retaining walks . q . The Design Review Board shall review the site plans , floor plans and elevations , including proposed colors and materials . Tho Design shall, incorporate elements of Lhe Downtown Design Guidelines, and elements of historic Huntington Beach structures . h. The site plan (or reference page) shall include all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 4 . Prior tic issuance of building permits, the applicant/owner swaell complete the Following : *a. Compreeh:.insivee documentation of the project site, as it currently exists, sshasll be prepared prior to the issuance of any building, grading, and/or demolition permits . The documentation shall be in accordance with standards established by the Historical American Buildings Survey/Historical American Engineering Records (HABS/HAER) . The report sahaell be archivally maintained with provisions for public access. The costs associated with preps cation and smaintee.,aance of the documentation shall be the responsibility of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. *b. prior to the approval or issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building perwitss, all facets of the project related to historic preservation shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Huntington Beach . c. Where determined necessary bg the Department of Public forks, a grading plan shall be submitted to the DF gartutent of Public Works Cor review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grasding permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction anted initial eepesrast:ion of the pxoJeect may be required if deemed necessls a ry by the Director of Public Wa rks. *'Envi:ronnental Mitigation Measure staff Report - 9/19/09 --11-- (3613d) - '0 *d . property owners srAall pay in-lieu parking fees for additional square footage to account for the added parking ! demand . Fees shall be paid prior to issuanca of building permits or certificate of occupancy , whichever comes first . The offaite parking spaces shall be in place prior to the final approval of building per.sdts for the new development . e . All applicable Public Works fees rhali be paid . f . Where required by the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code or the State Subdivision Map Act , a parcel map consolidating parcels or portions of parcels shall be submitted . Said map shall bit recorded prior to final inspectio" and a copy submitted to the Department of Community Development . q . An interim parking and/or building materiels storage plan shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development to assure adequate parking is available for employees , customers, contractors , etc. , during any etrurture' s construction phase . *h. The City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency shall be responsible for in-lieu fees to cover working spaces required for the existing square footage in the Demonstration Block . Fees shall be paid pri r to issuance of building permits or Certificate of Occupancy, whichever camas first . The number of spaces to be grandfathered must be agreed upon by both the property ogler and the Redevelopment Agency and existing square footage should be � verified as part of the architectural plans accompanying any project application. *3 . A. sign ani landscape plan shall be submi� ted to the Design Review Boa. 7 and/or City Planning Department by each property owner prior 0 approval of sign permits . The location and type of all signs shall conform to the provisions of the Huntington beach Ordinance Code and be consistent with the standards listed on page 38 of tide downtown Design Guidelines . All lighting and landscaping materials shall also be consistent with the guidelines . *b . The City shall encourage and/or sponsor a, planned sign program on both sides of Main Street . This program shall include possible sign aa'mortixation, City funded removal of existing signs, and City funded purchase and mounting of new signs . 07 . The City shall implement consistency of similar hardscape and lendacepe on both sides of Main Street. *Environmental Mitigation Measure steft gert - 9/19/69 -ia- (3612d) i S . An projects within the parking district , comprised of Downtown Specific Plan Districts 3 and 8a, request development approval, they shall contribute their " fai:-share" towards relucing the cumulative pa.rktnq demand deficiency . Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of buildiag permits or certificate of c.iccupancyl whichever Comes first . The offsite parK, ng specog Xhall Le in place p-ior to the issuance of a certificatw of occupancy for the new development . 9 . Thu applicant shall meet all applicabIL local , Stater and Federal Firs 6:odes , Ordinances , and star.dards . 10 . The development shell comply with all applicable provisions of. the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department . 11 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an oft--rite facility equipped to handle them. 12 . Construction sha) i be lin. ited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 13 . This conditional use permit shall become null and void unless exercised within one ( 1) year of the date of af�,.it'+l approval , or such a:tension of time as may be granted by ' .he Planning Commission pursuant to a written request seibmitt►d to the Planning Department a mirlmum 30 days prior to the expiration date. stnvirojaental Mitigation Measure JJ ALZCMJ JVE ACTION The Planning Commission may : (A) Find EIR No. 89-4 to be inadequate under the provisions of. CEQA and deny Conditional Use Permit No . 89 -1 with Special Permits and Coastal Development permit No . 89-1 with findings ; or (A) Find EIR No. 89-4 to be adequate and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 89-1 wit?" Special Permits and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-1 with findings . R staff Ropott y/19f89 13- (3612d) - AOPP' •f; i „a r.. ' Sam 4 i NTS 4 e • 1. property owner List Z . Area map ` 3 . site plat. � 4 . SIR Be) . 89-4 (available for review in the Planning Department) S. karponse to comments on !'SIR No . 89-4 k 6. Draft Resolution adopting SIR No . 69-4 7. zhibit A - Mitigation Measures 8. Exhibit a -• Statement of Overriding Considerations 9. Exhibit C - Findings (EIR No. 89-4 ) 10. Errata Sheet - SIR No . 89-4 I l J '1 ti 77 PROPERTY OWNERS PARCEL NUMBER STREET ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER 024-147-01 411 Olive Avenue City of Huntington 13cach { 024-147-03 220/218 Fifth Street David Burris 024-147.05 210 Fifth Street William G. Gallegos 024-147-08 202 Fifth Street City of Huntington Beach/Dirtcher 024-147-09 412 Walnut Avenue Susan R. Wul:ner 024-147-10 225 Main Street Dick Schwprtz 024-147-11 223 Main Street Gary Mulligan 024-147-14 217 Main Street Douglas M. Langevin 024-147-15 215 Main S trees Thomas R. Wurzl 024-147-23 213 Main Street Pauline M. Cooper 024-147-25 211 Main Street Richard A. Harlow 024-147-26 203 Main Street Thomas A. Caverly 024-147-27 201 Main Street Thomas A. Caverly i 024-147.28 205 Main Street Marjorie T. Decker 024-:147-29 206 Fifth Street City of Huntington Beach/lirtcher 024-147-30 208 Fifth Sheet William G.J. Gallegos 024-147-31 , Alley City of Huntington Beach 024-147-34 221 Main Street Ben A. Trainer 024-147-33 212 Fifth Street City of Huntington Beach 024-147-34 214 Fifth Street Ciry of Huntington Beach 024-147-35 224 Fifth Street Oscar G. Taylor 024-147-36 222 Fifth Street Orange Coast Specialties 024-147-37 207 Main Start Cary Hatch 024-147-38 209 Main Street Gary Hatch Source: City of Hundrgton Reach r 14 �, j + r i I ARFIELD AVE c� C�a w PACIFIC OCEAN ,Project Site IR Source: STA Inc. LIna PROJECT SITE � ER 89-4 no Kcal 04Y of HuMkVon Beach WrHA+16WX- 2d . ..... _ .. ` FIRTH ramsT _ F i Oaft" iiij sa�mu zr 1 � 1 Z f Ron" limuclum I I a..aw.' aN w __ nr rltw F sf7 Yw MUM —' tce rli�l 223 R- .�..a u•fK. l - dAV MAIN STREET ;•�-, ` uloe��.xrcuTalrws - -_ - / ' j ATTACHMENT 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89-4 (available for review in the Planning Department) t, y ,r• . •r1 1 e �� 1 1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ""PACT REPORT NO. R9-4 This document provides responses to comments received on Draft EIR 14o. 89-4 in accorftnce with Section 15088 of CEQA Guidelines. The Draft EIR, was made available to various public agencies, responsible agencies, citizen groups and interested Individuals for a period of 30 days. Copies of all comments n:eeived as of September 12, 1989, fallow this cover page. Comments have been numbered and responses have been correspondingly nu.-ibered. Responses are presentcd for each comment which raised a significant eimitoamental issue. Sever:;1 of the comments do not addr m. the coz:.pleteness or adequacy of the EIR or raise significant environmental issues. A substantive response to such wwments to not appropriate within the content of the California Environmental Iity Act. Such comments are responded to with a "comment acknowledged" heft:ence. This indicates that the comment will be forwarded to the appropriate declsiasmaker for their review and c :deration. C& rs Letter - September 11, 1989 DML 1-12 DmWas M. Lawvin Letter - September 10, 1989 I"U 1-7 Huntington Beach Historic Bssou es Ord d Letter - September 11, 1989 HBHS 1-5 Huntfton Beach Historic Society •j ti a . Mks I'1 A. office of the City Clerk is - City of Huntington Leach N L S'ON 1, �, , '0v P.O. BCX 190 CALIFORNIA 9264 - s Ocrup/Be 305 piSt. rect- Hunt . ch , CA 9264 0 1 % Off "c!the City Clerk .. City Of Huntington Beach I ...., .�.'�:.R.. .__..w -��,,, ,,1 � _ .� • g F.O.BWi 190 CALIFORNIA 1294a' 024-144-12 CHILC;UTT/SCHWARTZ 1303 Oakgrove Road Westlake VIL, CA 91162 SCN 03 0,116.1371 F 140 TXMIE EXF"D SCHRARTZ 0�3 NINTERN001) CT 1 � FCpARK r A `�302 �.. Y rl RETURN TO �tEND�f� � r " 0. • y AT Ir (Wim of Mtn city CI• _. ., .. ..w -- t, ry,ity o_ Huntington Beach PRES rRT It ,, P.O.bOX I!0 CALIFORNIA 9�1i4�r I � `� ()P_co-ant 321 Maim Stiz 'et; u t: tlt: . Neagh , UA 26=A r + i 1 I I Ill II 'City of Huntington 13cach !! r• ;'., �'� F.O.sox ale CALIFORNIA 92d4af 7;1 !, 024,144-02 VERETT kf, CKS Z Huntington �e�ac r ji�{Il, �.�. > '. h, CA occupant 31.9 pia n � �t Hunt . AC , h 92548 i r C'. Ill lisle lrl1ll1n114lf11l1 Ile Ill r , r •) i 1 , Le/al 106044 Ow" of tm City Cwk ;, S ; - Nuswllntatan d� 1� 92 ., ,� .� r ., .► r i 024-144-02 Everett M. Hicks C.1�'+ :tb �' .U , Box. 310 CA 92648 / 10 FIRST CLASS MAIL - Of1ilfbl the C1ttr Cforie City of Huntington BCach pRF. � �`��} � r''`'`'rll�:� < < r ``�• �._ P.D.sox 190 CAUVORNiA 9264a :<: ,:� ;�. !i �� �1•� ` I 02 1. W '� ;` ,�', .r r ► : EVE _ HIC:KS p. F,0. B 1 Hynd fR •h; CA 9,6�1S _r Office of !city clerk • . . . .... „�.,, � Beach ,fir a� Huntington Occup i� 315 a i.n S L• rec I► (C se'e Hur Beach , S2Gdti CWO(9 f(fA., '1�'11111'!'If11��tlilll�tl'/1�+11'llllll`I,It111f�I � .. ,�:, ', '`�, 11 11 ff ' a _ auednoao ' ,!. ,�� �� i; ��i �' �.'1i':•l ! :��1� ��1�01rIM'�1t'� QIN�'1'y'.1 II'I�III�I����Ilt��ll�i�ll�l��l���'��tltllll�lll�lll • 1 � 1,9Z6 O /fnj :qlulAt-. 1 1IXTs 60Z �' j•,� �f9%r6 VINN VO 067 XOr'O'd I �?.�r . . `.-;• ,, �' � f , /.. . v dal vc flv9Z6 V:) IgDeag •,� tip. que uoi gupunH Jo AITO i YY*1Iy NO OF . i n 1 - , ,, ,0. r r' n ` f ' r • 0 win• a.. .•,la ri 1. RESOLUTION NO . 6084 A ZRSOLUTrOM Ui THE r;ITf COUNCIL OF TUR CITY OF HEIRT111=1V 3EACH a CALIFORNIA, ADOPT7XG ENWROMMSTAL IMPACT REPORT 140. 89--4 FOR THE NIXED USE D".ZLOPMBln a6uNlDEn By PAIN MEL"'I', WALNM AVER , F I Tni STRRET AND OLIVE AVENUE: "HEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 and related entitlements have been prepared ; and The C Lty► of Huntington Beach wr--;s the lead agLancy in the preparation o+! the Environmental tmpect Report ; and All persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly I given have been heard by the Planning Commission either through written notice or during a public hearing on September 19 , 1989 , and October 3 , 1989 , and such responses and comments as were made were duly noted and responded to; and All pernohs :end agencies wishing to respond to notice du'l.y j given have been heard by the City Council either through written notice or during a pWic hearing on November 60 1939 , and such comne'nts and responses ae were made were duly nr.ted and responded to; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach as follows : SECTION 1 . The City Council does h }reby find that Environmental Impart Report No . 89 -4 has bean completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all State and local guidel'_r►ee . SECTION Z . The City Council has considered ai- ' significant effects detailed in L'nvironmentati impact Report No . 99-4 , together with existing and proposed measures to mitigate such significant effects (see Rxhibit A) . - 1 - "r � L ^is SECTION 3 , The City Council finds that through the i implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures , the majority of the pots ,tially adverse impacts associated i•rith the proposed project can he eliminated or reduced to a level of insignificance . SECT10h 4 . The City Crsuncil further finds that the benefits accruing to the City by virtue of implementing the Downtown Specific Plan, override thg unmitigatable effects detailed to Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 and the attached Stbtement of Overriding Considerations (see Exhibit B) , and the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ne:reby adapt and certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No. 89-4 . SECT1019 5 . The planning Director is hereby authorized and ' directed to filer with the Office of the County Clerk a notice of determination for: Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4, as required by Section 21152 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Counoll of the City of Huntington Beach on the 6th day of November , 1989, by the fc] lowing roll call vote : Mso "y 41 Z"- I Mayor ATTXST: APPROVED AS TO IRM: r ,. .- i.,.,...._ City Clo J* City Attorney%.04 REVIRM AND APPROVED: INITIATED Ali APPROVED : City Administrator � D'1 actor. of oimnunity Development 6084 i 'R ��YMlilfiiWl6l.•.hr Ys.�i�.fid.ti r d l+.,• ' .. ... tea. �•�/itr L 1 EXHISIT A � MITIGATION MEASURES (REVISIONS IN BOLD TYPE) x 1 . A sign and landscape plan -hall Le submitted to the Design Review Boai.d and/or City Planning Department: by each property owner prier to appro-y a .l of sign permits . The location and type of all signs shall r_onfc :rn to the provisions of the Huntington Beach ordinance Code and be consistent with the standards listed on page 33 of the 1 ot-ntown Design Guidelines . All lighting and landscaping materials shall also bo consistent with the Guidelines . 2 . The City shall encourage and/ter sponsor a planned sign program on both sides of Main Street . This program shall include possible sign amortization , City fended removal of existing signs , and City funded purchase and mounting of new signs . 3 . The City shall implement: cores i s Lency of s i►n:- 1 a r ha rdsc:ape and landscape or. both sides of Main Street . 4 , The pro7e'tt shall implement the following mitigation measure included in Downtown Specific Plan EIR No . 82 •-2 . Depending on the results of soils studieu conducted for new construction mitigating measures wi 11 be requited to lie incorporated into the project . These measures may include but not limited to : buffer , special grading , special foundations , subdrains , dowatering devices , and ret• aininr, walls . 5 . Comprehensive documentation of the project site , as :LL currently exi - ts , shall be prepared prior to the issuance of any building , grading , and/or demolition permits . 'the documentation shall be in accordance with :standards established by the Historical American Buildings Survey/Historical American Engineering Records (HASS/HAER) , The repo c t shall be archivally maintained with provisions For public access . The costs associated with preparation and maintenance of the document z1Cion shall be the responsibility of the Huntington tleach Redevelopment Agency , 6 . Prior to the approval or issuance of any demolition , gradi.ng , and/or building permits , all facets of the project: related to historic preservation shall be reviewed and approved by the r:ity of Huntington Beach , 7 . Prior to the issuance of any demolition permits ar, adequate monitoring and/or bonding program shall be established between the City Redevelopment Agency and property owners to ensure that demolition and Construction vibration .impacts d-n not adversely affect offsite structures . (3735d% .. 15- 6084 j 0 . krioz to the is ince of Building Permits , i detailed lighting I plr,i shall be approved by the Department of Community Dek►elopmant: , i h;• plan shall be cons i ,4 tPzit with the Downtown ' lighting plan and lighting standards in the Downtown Design Guidelines , j 9 . The City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment A.genc,y shall be responsible for parking spccas required For exis `ing sc;uare footage . The number of spades for which the Agency will be responsible shall, be based on ea.j , ting legally constructed sgizare footage , to be verified prier to issuance of building permits . 10 Property owners shall provide on--site perking or pay ire--Lieu feeff for addi t: ioval square footage in accordance wi.t:h tiv, approved facade r, rt,nt program . Provision for payment of fees must: be inade pri,) r Lo is,uance, of building permit:t, , in accordance with the prOgLam. II . As projects within the parking district , comprised of Downtown :specific Plan WsLricts 3 and 5m , request development; approval , they shall contribute their " fair-share " towards reducing the cumulative parVing demand deficiency Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits or certificate of occupancy , whichever corners first . The offsite harking spaces shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new development . 12 . Ithe Precise Plan of Street A i,gnment for Walnut. Avenue between Main and Sixth Streets shall. be. resolved and adopted by the. City Council prior to issuance of building permits for n(ITi construction on the logs adjoining Walnut Avenue ( 201 Main Street. , 412 Walnut Avenue , 202 Fifth St.r.eet) . a � r ;if;",, 43'35d) -� 16 - �►} 6084 e ,. womb * y . Page 3 - Council /Agoi...r Minutes - 11/5/8' A action was made by Erskine, ieconded by MacAllister, to provide a written report sent by ces•tified mail to each affected property owner 11 the Fifth Street/Main Street area stating (1 ) property owner alternatives, O deadlines for availing oneself of those various alternatives, (3) thi applicable standards r1h respect to parking, etc . , and (d) a self-mdaressed return envelope to the city requesting a written response as to why the property cAmers are not choosing to take advantage of the alternative at this time. The motion carried 6y the folloning roll call vote , AYES: MacAllister, Green, Winchell , Bannister, gays , Erskine KOES: Silva ABSENT: None �d�IMl1*�1/1A# ;rMAt4A�AAA#�AAr#A�AAAA�#A#InAA�IA�MA� 6#A#AAAA�YA##AsiAAAtti�##A�+F.�MA#AAAAAA#A I The kyn r adjourned the regular meetings cf the City Council and the Nedevelopment Agency to 5:30 p.m. ., Monday, November 13, 1989, in Room B-8 of the Civic Center Complex. Unnie Brockway __ City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTEST: QM NOS NOS $AJ3i Star_ Ci sty Clerk/Clerk Mayor/Chairman STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange City of Huntington Beach) I, CONNIE BRCX:1,.MY, the duly appc 'lnted and qualified City clerk of the City of Huntington :,each, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at theiv regular meeting held on the bth day of November 1989. WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 13th day of hovember, 1989. City Clerk and ex-officio Clark of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beaph, California yDeput,y ' F; 1 F t • V. r } Council Chamber, Chic Center Huntington Beach , California Monday , November 6 , 1989 A tape r*cordi ng of this meeti nc i s on file in the City Clerk ' s Oftice . Mayor Bannister called tho regular meetings -.)f the City Coc+nc i 1 and tho. nedeve ropment kgercy of the City of' Hunti r;gton Beach to order at 'l p .m. RDLL CAL Present: MacAll ' ster, Green , Winchell , Bannister , Mays , Silva, Erskine Absent : None is** 1A+4rrr * **IRft0%1'.riAAAAAhAAAAAAAA ofAAit* A #4AAA014AA#AAAAitA0,*0*A0,4AA#fiAA*AAAAA41AtoAA (City.Cy-t1d WLAEAW d....- a r-RIA1,. rLt` 1�.� ► .R�PlI A� � ��R _�F f PLAMNIN f PE0M j jS/MA5TAI OEVELOPMENT fERf�.t T_N�._n-:_LLE_RURQNM�N L_IMPAr R -R NO. �Q- -• Ape ,� f1 NI En P R V l� WITH MQI�IE�� TIQJ PREPORT tV 1C Z-F5 ..PBC _ 8, Q_1LE NJ T.Q QPER] QHkE.- ___(0Nf�._ 1• i IDED-B C_MAIN/Mi_rruMIU !!QUYIE) The Mayor announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to consider the following : I L CA�Lj�N i f q: Cond* tion:l Use Permit No . 89-1 with special permits , Coastal development Permit No. 89--1 , and Environmental Impact Report No. 89--4 . ApPL.IG ,NT : City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency MPELLANI: Councilman MacAllister I. J10h: One block bounded by Main Street , Walnut Avenue , Fifth Street and Olive Aversue . : Downtown Specific Alan District 5 (Mixed Use -- Comr(wercial /Office!Residential ) . QUEST: Appeal of P)-Nining Commission' s approval of a request to allow construction of up tn 70,726 square feet of mixed use development in one city block . The requested spscial permits include a) zero foot build-to line on Main Street in lieu of 5 fe,t; b) zern foot setback on Walnut Avenue in lieu of 5 feet; 0 up to 30 feet of building height within 25 feet of Main Street � in lieu of 25 foot building height. FAMIROMMENTAL... SS ATU.S: This action is covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 89-49 WM Ch the Council will also Consider . P p iJ S , 1 f r; qi f Page 2 - Council /Ay 1111;y Minutes 11 /6/89 QQ&U&1.__�3.].& Non-appealable portion of the Coastal, Zone. Legal requirements for -)otification , publication end posting hao been met . No communications or written protests received on the matter . The City Clerk presented ;fie; 1��i9n_N��. _li��� for Council consideration -• "A w kESOLUTION OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIFORNIA ADOPTINb ENVIko NmENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89-4 FOR THE. MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT BWNDED BY MAIN :JREET, K4LNUT AVF NUE , FIFTH STREET ,AND OLIVE AVENUE. " T`re Mayor declared the heari ny open. John Cotton spoke on behalf of Oscar Taylor and his family. He stated that 'r even though the family did not take hart in the Facade Program that they were " still entitled to parking spaces . He stated he believed the family ' s property should not have been excluded from the chart that showed the existing square footage and parking to be grandfathered and that the information should be made public and made available it the future so that it insured the receival of' entitlements . Wj G 1�j , property ow.,ter , inquired i nformati can from Council regarding parking spaces to be grandfathered in . He stated he wanted a complete disclosure of all areas and wanted to see computations and permits done and made available. He stated the parking spare should be written in t.1e deed to insure parking. pick Halo , property owner , stated he was to support of taking action on the matter as soon as possible as he wanted to demolish his building and start new construction . He supports the 4 ' widening of Main Street , the 0' setback on Walnut, and he supports a 30 ' building height to a,:commodate two stories . There being no one present to speak further on the matter and there being no further protests filed , either oral or written , the hearing was closed by ti,e Mayor. The Community Development director explained the Facade Program offered to those owning property in the 2nd block . Discussio►., was held between the City Administrator, the Community Development Director , and Councilwoman Winchell regarding the Facade Program and the sites of the property owners who were not participating. A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Bannister, to ( 1 ) deny said appeal and sustain the Planning Commission decision , adopt and certify as adequate EIR No. 89-4 and adopt Resolution No. 6084, (2) approve Coastal Development Permit No. 89-1 and Conditional Use Permit No . 89-1 with special permits , with findings and conditions of approval as outlined in Attachment No. 1 of the November 6 , 1989 RCA with additional wording to be included in Page 3, paragraph 3, Item 4d . After the word "existing" in the second line it shall read " . . .approved legal and permitted uses within that square footage, " The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: McAllister, Green, Bannister, Mays , Silva, Erskine NOES: Ni nchal l ABSENT: None f „ i' iFn.j lx• 0 M ►�r1 ► Page 3 Counci 1 ,'Agency nu-ees 11/6/pq A motion was made by Erskine , seconded by MacAllister , to provide a written report sent by certified mail to each affected property owner- in the Fifth Street/Hain Street area stating ( 1 ) property clw,ler al torr.atives , (2 ) deAdl i nes for availing oneself o" those �,arious alternative, , (3) the applicable standards with respect to parking , etc . , and (4) a self-addressed return enveinpe to the city requesting a written response as to why the property owners are not choosing to take advantage of the alternative at this tim" The motio., carried by the following roll Gail vote : A,yUi : MacAllister, Green , Winchel1 , Bannister , days , Erskine NOES : Silva ABSENT: None A*As *:;16 h p AAOp 01kaAOj A *A4A* AAAAp*A0,OF4*r 4AM A 4 4 t A A A A A The Mayor adjourned the regular meNtings of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency to 5 :30 p .m . , Monday, November 1 -.3 , 1989 , in koom B-8 of the Civic Centier Complex . City Clerk and ex-officie Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , California ATTEST: Connie Brockway City Clerk/Clerk Mayo r/Chairrnan STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) City of Huntington Beach) Z , CONNIE BROC:K.WAY , the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach , California. , do hereby certify thak the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meeting held on the 6th day of November 1969 . WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 13th day of November, 1989. City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Deputy �w � L i 1 R INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIGN To Hamxhd 7e&64ky, PtCacming WAectm From Connie Pkoc,hmy, ('irty Ctak SulOct Legd Ad {o,. dppedt CLAP 99-1 uVaper-i&t Cete 1 V120189 ErR 89-41cvr 89-1 pelutiitlb { a have to he um .the attached eegat ►;o ti.ce and adAus tzbe t',6 6m .the by Ct.owing �teaannt+. 1 . There iz no de atip,t,%on o6 khat ,the C(!P wtth Spec;ae Pmnit.o i.d .auch ae: Con"onaZ We Penm.t t 89-1 ckt th Spec a, _Fe,%m.W - A ptopo-W on %equcra,t to etc, erte CoqAtAt 19evetopmerlt Peu-it 89-1 - A negaut .to etc, Z. The Coaa•tai' 4o►mni6zion .66 not on the macUnq -U4t. 3. Att peuom 4ubxnittc:ng a wx,i,,tten uques t must be no.U6 ed (theme Ptobabty mZn'.t any. ) 4. The notice does not atate that the FAo jest .ib witk4i .the coaa.tat zone. a statement 64o,m S. Seeaua od Pa6 t d-i f 66 ,o za the AP's zhoa4 havel the depvAtmert head (you on Mike Adams) that the AP a ace dum ,the 1989 tott. 'dmi bib ed on 1989 maps. P'tWe: ke tukn ,the covLe emoted,tegat notice a.b soon 44 pa4 .i bte., -- by next Monday tcc 40VOn ac .c t can be pubt.�.ahed. Thank your, Conn?l M 1 MM"W,W 989 5 . 4 A. ( 1) �1lRlI".hpl?. �.! 41..� i! � • h (a) Cont.(ynts of Notjce . i A s.tatemnt that the developa6tit is o+ithin they' coastal zone; j th* flee for i i l lno appeslIO (b) vi on_of NQLJC2 . Notices $hall be mailed , by first class mail , at least ten ( 10) calendar bays be ore tr ;- public hearing on a CDP application to the folzowing : ( 3 ) the applicant ; i ( ii ) they owner of the subject parcel or duly authorized agent ( if different from the applicant) ; ( iii ) all persons owning property within three hundred ( 300) feet from they perimeter of the subject parcel; (iv) all persons residing within one hundred ( 100) feet from the perimeter of the subject Parcel. ; (vi) any commission or board as provided in the C-1,Cp; ' no who have submitted a written requet�fsr notification of all CDP applications or who hava submitted a written f request-. for notification of any proposed develoymnt of they subject parcel, and who have submitted self-addressed, ptomped envelopes or paid a reasonable fee to receive such notice; (vi i i ) newspaper of general ci rculatiou in the 1 Coastal Zune; notice to be published once. r� r;; •;, (This provision is applicable only when than COP application is to be heard by the Planning Comissioh. ) i J10 1 i r:AJ 'i p . V4.3 f, Pow (d) Wif, JS :1 a I-ACt. That the development conforms with the public &cc*&& and public recreation po 1 ici.ms of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act ; addiLton to the findings required for a Conditi real Exception by thm Board of Zoning Adjustments and/or the Flannir4 Cocrimissi.ono the following finding shall also be made: "Approgal of t?.e Conditio..al exception will result in no modification to the requirements of the C-1,UP. " "Liu_ina-jotL Cgmmentmi. ( 1) The approving authority specified in subsection (G) of this section, shell hold a public hearing prior to any action can a MP applic:aLion where any of the following apply: (a) The CDP application is for a non-appealable develo;„%ent end the base district regulations y require the holding of- r public hearing prior to action or recommendation on other" approvels required for the project . (b) The CDP application is for an appealable development , as defined in Section 989 . 5 . 1 . (2) .A public hearing on a CDP application ma±r be held concurrently with any other public hearing on -the development project held by the approving authority specified in subsection (G) of this section . (3) Any person may submit written comntent on a Cap application, or on a CDP appeal, at any time prior to the• close of the applicable public heating . if no public hearing is required, written comnsents may be submitted prior to the action dote speci► : .e+d in the i6otice required by subsection M of this section. written coonnts shall be submitted to the H. h. 01roctor Who shall forward them to the appropriate person . board, commission, council or applicant . M' i1 1 1' i5 , 1 M ` ;. 0 � t T •T r o w 985 . 5 . 5--585 . 5 . 7 ( iii ) they owner of the subject property or duly authorized agarit ( if different from the appellent and/or applicant) .- (iv) the Coastal. Comminxion: (v) any commission or board as provided in the C"-LCP; (vi ) all perhons who have submitted a written request fox notification of action on this specific (.*!-, ? application and who haves submitted self-addressed , atemped envelopes or paid a reasonable fee to receive rurh notice. (3) Maicd of City Appeal Acton. On or before the seventh (7th) calendar day following the, date of j action on an appeal , the H. H. Director, or the Clerk i of the City Council (aa appropriate) shall forward, by first class mail , a copy of the written decision to the persona who were notified of the appeal . (Bea subsection (f ) (2) above. ) (C) Actio�Ee sbia tQ the oasts Cp es gn Aft!,r houstion of riti .pga2A. An action by the amity council regarding a CDP application for any appealable development may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 1 0) working days from the date of the Councii ' s action by the applicant, an aggrieved person, or any two (2) members of ' the Coastal Commission, provided such appeal in filed In accordance with the adopted regulations of the Coastal s CoswAission. IAUkIL meter_ aeGial. Whenever a CDP request under the peovislons of this section has been denied and such dersial bow become final, no now GDP application for the same or similar request may be accepted within one ( 1) year of the dein! sl date, unless the H. B. director finds that a sufficient change in circumstances has occurred to warrant a now CDP application. 1,.Uf _CW. A CDP shall expire on the latest .y e.apiratlan date skplicable to rainy other permit or approval required for the project, including any extension granted for other permits or approvals . Should the project require no city peraaitg or approvals other then a CDP, the CDP shall expire one (2) YOU from its date of apprcwal if substantial work on the _ , _ * r S,:- ,:I� :,_' �J0 a 1 n +M 1 1 969 . 5 . 5 2gesin . Development pursuant to an approved CDP sham not cor►me,nce until all applicable appeal period.i expire or , if appealed , until all appeals , including the Coastal Commission, have b+ein exhausted . Tho action regarding any Cats application may be appealed in compliance with the prcvisions of the H antington Beach Ordinance Code and with the fol:lcwing additional provisions : (A) ACtio.Ulo 1e _�.3��! .].> .�t�.�.h� a. a 1. Qmmiesiop . An action regarding a CDF application for any appealable development may be appealed directly to the Coastal Commission '"thout exhausting the appeal procedures specified by this section provided such appeal is filed in accordance with the adopted regulations of the Coastal Commission. qw.t,,.,Aetin n .A Qe�l.e Ar, oxd ance w!1 h the jiunt iapjaA AfjMrn Ordinsnce code . ( 1 ) Jilina�Froceduto. An appeal shall be filed within tern (10) working dayi of the approving ,authority' s action by any aggrieved person with the Department of Development Services on a form provided by the M. a. �f Director , and shall be accompanied b;; a fee not by resolution of the City Council and a statownt of the grounds for appeal . Said appeal fee shall be waived in lieu of :the reimbursement of that: fee through the instrument of Section 2231 of the Revenue and Taxation �I Code (68 90) claim or sirai,lar reimbursement process established by the Coastal Commission. f ( a) CaDtafts at - sabre. Notice shall contain the same I stmtifttibil ea the ortginai notice except that it shall also give the appellant ' s name and state 'A that the hearing is an appeal . Iyq (b) Mvislan of.bDt ce. notice shall. be mailed, by e first class mail , at least ten *( 10) calendar dare E before the public hearing on an appealed OF application to the foilowing .. ` ( 1 ) the appellant ( ii ) the applicant (if different from the appellant) ; 11/87 ; , J •Y Y r 1 . iti•"J f 1 4'ilM 1 rL �� r.Yua•, Noolin ton Bench planning Commission P.O. so rso CALIpORNIA 926 Leta : October 4 , 1989 NOTICE OF ACTION Mgli.cant t City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency . 1., . Ar Subjects CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 89--1 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS , COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-1 a ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 8 9-4 Your application was acted uppoon by the Huntington Reach planning Comaission on October N3 , 1989 and Your request Wasle Withdrawn Approved Approved with Conditions r.......XX,..._. (See Attached ) Di sapprov*d Tabled Continued until Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cade , the action taken by the planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to the City Council by you or an interested party. S&id appeal must be in � writing and must set forth in detail the act;:ons- and '-7rojuds by rnd upon w4sich the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred and sixty-five ($165 ) dollars and be submitted to the City Clarks office with,tn ten (10) days of the date of the Commission 's action* In your case fury fo►r iilOng an appeal. and paying the filingfee is � �,...� .g Lt 11st Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any apF11cati0A b0cameS grill and Void one (1 ) year after final approval, I unless actual construction has started, •,J Syr, .,'1%' r ' . . ..,:',..` .N�,.....,.. . - .;�...�.ti.+...„• r:.,..;1. •w,•.w No r ,+ai.Mlwvrpt;w',rsrfrAwck•rM!' r ti P Ma ITV CW HORN+ TINGTON ISUACH OEINTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION wporoKm"OW To Howard Zelefsky From Connie Brockway Directr)r Planning City Clerk SuN.. ,t Public Hearings Oats' Uctober 30, 1989 I As ,you can see the attached hearings, at the very last minute were up-dated to the 1989 Parcel Nook, to correct ,the AP's on bath attached heari nq5. An the 6PA-89-1 there were AP numbers on Your 1988 list that did not appear on o f '�: ease in -onn F`W l s s if �9 maps were used. see T+i 1 i to) The Downto►m CUP hearing was also Iron the 1988 book, and as you can set updated o the 1989 book. It is necessary that I receive your Pre sonal -verification that the 1989 update -is based on the 1989 parcel�� maps (including Fountain Valley) by receiving the attacheadavlt signed. This is necessary due to the fact that you initialed the CUP- Downtown Hearing as being based on 1989 maps and they were not. The GPA hearing of Mike Connors was an understandable error, however, it too will need the same verification. If, in comparing the AP list with the parcel maps .you find people it should be sent to we can do this if you get this office the addresses by Wednesday. The hearings cannot be held if I do not receive this information, as I will not he able to prepare minutes of the hearing which Mate "that all legal requirements for notification" were met. Please do not have the Flenner who did the previous } again do this. i h pr v�ous verification V77- A' 1 1 o� INTER-DE!'ARTMEN7 COMMUNIC4,11 ON i Ta Howard zel efsky From Connie brockwq airectir Planning "-i wy Clerk Subject Notification for Puhli , Hearings Data October 30, 1969 - or,," i (a.) AppeaI of Planning Commission' s denial of General PlAn Amery nt No. 89-1 and Zone Change No. 89-2 j Both scheduled to r%- held 11/6/89 Be a-wised that there has not been any recent subdivisions, tentative parcel maps, or lot line add us vents within the notification area which would affect the mailing list, she attached lists were based on the 1989 •ma ) as well as 1989 Map Books. The notification labels prov ed meet the indent of the requi remnts of Division 9 aA State Law. 'r f 00 / _ r rec.to I. PI 9 M i 1 r' CITE' CW 1 UNTi M al" N INTER-DEPARTMENT' COMMUNICATION ' ' ''; , ► oward Zelefs , Divector From Connie Brockway, City Clerk �Y y I , Public Hearings Date October 270 1989 Please note that if you wish the hearings to oe held 11/fi/89t crew labels must be delivered by 3 u.m, on both hearings so we ma; have time to r�emoJ I before tail pick up at 1 :20. If you do not want hearings held, i rif ov-m rie now so I may assigr my staff to other projects today And not keep them available for res cuffing and 11'iel iricy envelopes , i ':1 I 1'lu i 1 H' T, NO 'i P l,. tl r 4^ �, yr AMlhp 116d is Mubhbh AOvediVVN nlr Of .Ak s§ndi't► k41r49 pubft ne"Woo by aeNM 91 If* SuPOW Carl of OFihq* o#ner, cakferms, kwvo & A+i?IA, aniod x• beplemhdR. tool. 6r4j STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Or",,q owe* MOW" ""W"" ""Wow ham owd"aMww ► 64" ��� M M *r�lw "tip,p, I am a Citizen of the U ited States and Al resident ofow ' the I:Ounty elCatesiid; I am over the tllpe of eiyhtelm years, and not a party 10 or interested in the below onlftled ma"er. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Ctoasl CRtLV PILOT, anth which is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspewr of genoral Circulation, printed and peito:is'ed in the City of Costa Mean, County of Orange. State of Californik and theta Note of Of whlCh copy attached hereto is a true and complete rmpy. was printed and published In they C4.osta Mm a, 12 Newposl Eitach, Huntington Beach. Fountain Valley, !rvwne, the South Coast cnmrrlunives and L,04unx v Beacn isswes of "id newspapef for _a-1 time , conwutive weeks to wll the ;ssve(s) of 41 I I 196 1 doexfire, under a of u , that the f�► �+ I�r� rY ftwegoing lot true and correct, F.X* utad op _,3ctobe r 26 , 198 9 at Cast& Mesa, California. Signature �1lill' �r 1� �►T�M r { 1 1. r, irTOWA w ; ;,, • Publish ` 9/ 26/89 I A Ate. hJ.,r wl , APPSAX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EO, 09-1 WITH $PSCIAL PERMITS/COASTAL 0MLOPMENT PERMIT NO A E8-1/EVVXR0WMTAL IMPACT IL.V. RT NO . 89-4 Y (APPSU- OF PLMM I LIG C0OM- I S 8 IONS `S APPROVAL OF A WOW 'PO A14LO ri CONSTRUCTION OF ::P TO 70, 726 S1RX FXZT 01' V IX= USE DMLOPMENT. ON ONS CITY SLOCK) 10 0ilBtE5Y GIVEN the the HUat1A9ton Beach City Council will h public hearing it the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Clr$a Cdeter, 2000 :fain street, Huntington Beach, California , on the dates =0 at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statmon60:0 of all r­ rsons who wlAh to be head . relative to the application described below. nl►�rtrlr�•twr+p: Monday, November 6 , 1r39 , 7 : 0 0 PM URL1 =101 K 99.0 Conditional Use Permit No. 89-1 with special permits , Coastal Develnoment Per;ait No . 89-1, and Environmental Impact Report No . 89--4 . � NT: City of Huntington Beach .Redevelopment Agency T Councilman MacAllister One block bounded by Main Street , Walnut Avenue, Fifth Street and Olive Avenue . Dtwntown Specific Plan District 5 (Mixed Use - ("nmercial/Office/Re v.idential) , t Appeal of Planning Commission ' s approval of a request to alloy constructiin of up to 70v72a square feet of �. " MiILad use development in one city block . The requested onsdi al permIts include a) zero fcoL build-to line on fair► Street to lieu of 5 feet ; b) zero foot setback on Walnut Avenue in lieu of 5 feet; cj up to 30 feat of buit.di.-w heliht within 28 feet of Niin Street in lieu of iS foot building hwighL . This action in covered by Environmental Impact Report Rio. 89--4 + which they Council � will also consider . ��• son-appealable portion of the Coastal Zone. i 11 4 J. { �!,', Sri'I'�)r�. `, •' I rl ' • r„ r, r W . 4 s r+(. I I•iJil „ (Continued) •w,d�.: v + a , R copy of the proposed request in on file in the City `;1,,• : dark's Offices 2000 Main Street, Huntington seache , 1 California $2648 , for inspection' by the public . •�' J :.:'y „rRT=215TXV PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and '1 ;. x*ss opifnloax or submit evidence for or against the application outlined above. If there are any further questions please call bsura Phillips, Associate Planner at 536--5271 . r,A q f R Connie' Brockway City Clerk 536-5227 (3928d) i i f i1,r j F r «l fiMUYis.i�'Yl.�'i"*'r•. 'e2e v� •r I • 1M 46 52 ]a Y 53-D Ir omo"Dao ANK ChACCMOLO :4FS A. LANE � Ave. 0106 19712 Quite Bay, Lane :637 Frankfurt . 406 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA92646 024-153-07 024-153-08 GARY MULLIGAN AMAD M1JTY1 ABDEx JACKS 211 Main Street 113 Main Street ton Such, CA 92648 Huntingtoi, Reach, CA 92648 ton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington,. 8 024-153--1 2 024-153•-'17 W N NAGSTAD JACK. GOSNEY ELEA NOR DRAPER ON Ave, P.O. Box 23 121 Main Street ' e lftstlftscha CA 90740 Rancho San,Fe, CA 92067 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 152--1s 024--154-01 024-154-02 )FRAW ALFONSO ADEL 2:FIDAN SARRAHERE/W00D y, 6630 'Vickiview 10220 Sick River 201 Fifth Street : . Canaga Park, Ca 91307 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Huntington Reach, CA 92648 024-IS4-03 024-154-05 024-154-06 MARGM. TAYLOR CALIF. RESORTS mc. CALIF. RESORTS INC. 220 'Via San Remo 305 Walnut 305 Walnut Newport Beach. Ca 92663 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 024-159-02 012-148-12 024-146--U3 HUNT. BEACH CO,-PRO TAX DENNIS NICCOLE Y. EUG1NE LITTLE P.O. Box 7611 400 'Third Street 10062 Merrimac San P'rancl,sco, CA 94120 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 024-153-04 024-146-06 . JANMS A LANE JAMES BRIGGS 637 Frowort 14312 Willow Lane �� Beach. CA 92646 Tustin, CA 92680 14 • OccP. Beach, t occupa t .':' Bet 116 re 108 a rest '• .' CA 92648 Hun A. 92648 Hunt . .ac , CA 92648 Ot Occupan occupant fth st reft 112 Fift �PA et 122 treet 0c�, CA 92648 Hunt . 92648 Hu���CA 92648 U &a Occupant"' Occupant; t 151 Fifth et 123 Main Street . Oh. 92648 Hunt; , ch , 92648 Hunt . aaach, CA ^2648 3cunt Occupa Occupant itcin Street ,119 Mai. ,rept 117 Ma n Street ilit. Reach, CA 9264E Hunt each, CA 9264.8 Brant. . Beach , CA 92648 mupant Occupant Occupant k6 Main 113 Main ;treat 124 Main Street kht . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Beech , CA 92648 loupant Occupant Ocwi�pant ,0 Main Street 318 Main Street 320 M -4:�aet at . mach, CA 92648 Hung . Beach , CA 92648 Hp4l'f. Beach , CA 92648 st�p�nt Occupant O ant �,�----r a street 324 Main Street 326 M `� ' reet� *t : each, CA 92648 Bunt . Beach , CA 92648 Huat, Beach, CA 92648 t Occupant Occupant 46street 109 Main Street 101 Main StreeStreet0h, CA 92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Occup t Occupant �! Ft". rar�t 307 t309 Main Street CA 92648 Hun 8esch, CA 92648 Hunt. Beach, CA 92648 Bet OCcup nt Occupant street 313 Ma ee 315 Main Stre et 4'ch, '` l 92648 Hunt , Ch, A 92048 Hunt . Beach , :..., 426�18 ko:" ^llll I b. L i. •h / lie TYl. r r��4 Occupant Occupant ' $19 Main Street 321 Main Street 9:.648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Runt . Bach, CA 92648 0 04J Occupant occupant �at to t }3wy . 504 Pacific Cst . Hwy . 506 pecifi.c Cst . Hwy. r � 92648 Hurst . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Occupant occupant ,,. at . Hwy. 520 Pacific Cst . Hwy. 303 Third Street R CA 92648 Hant . Beach, CA, 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 Occupant Occupant occupant 919 "third Street. 305 Third �reet 302 Sixth Street Hunt , Beach, CA 92648 runt , b�ch , CA 92648 Hunt . reach, CA 92648 Occupant Occupant occupant 300 04xth Street 310 Sixth Street 312 Sixth Street Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt , Beach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Occupant Occupant Occupant 302 Fifth Street 310 Fifth Street 31.4 Fifth Street Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 occupant Occupant occupant 320 Fifth Street 328 Fxf �-- reet 301. Fifth Street nt . Beache CA 92648 taunt "Beach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 ► Occupant occupant 9f�th eat 309 Fifth Street 311 Fifth Street C,�1 �26e8 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 ` t Ilenupent Occup nt SA li th street 317 Fifth Street 202 Si -Stxset Heigh, CA 92648 aunt . Beech, CA 92648 Hu ."-ff6i-3Z�A 92648 Occupant Accups t pcc ant 04 Sixth 8tx!!t 204 $IXib. nest 2CO S eet Basch, CA 92648 Xuat . Bee h, CA 92648 H Heac`�t;+ CA 92648 e: ' y ode 4 6 024-142-�08 024-�14249 '" A= H. WOOD ! RICHARD SATTAGLIA LONAVA INC. to fty Lone 18972 McArthur Blvd, P.O, Box 4830 mWnftw Brach,, CA 9?648 First Floor Long Beath, CA 90804 Irvine, CA 92715 024-142-12 024-142 -16 Co GONZALES hOCHAEL G. TATER IVS(IICE ALI 2164 317 Sth Street 19105-C Beachcrest to CA 90740 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 1417 024-142�-18 024-142-19 RY SANDRA PERRARI TONY GUENTHER •0. 116 706 W. Balboa Blvd. 308 Sixth Street AR g9524 Balboa, CA 92661 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 024-142-21 024-142-22 LM R. 11?aR ON GREGORY GONZALES WYILLIAM WANGLER 306 Sixth Street P.O. Box 2784 212 E. Duarte Road Huntingtors Beach, CA 92648 Seal Brach, CA 90740 Arcadia. CA 91006 024 443--20 024-1 44-01 024-144-02 JAMS E. KOLLER JOHN PARNAKIAN ]EVERETT M. HICKS 16001 Balientine Lane 205 Lake Street P.O. Box 310 Huntington Reach, CA 92647 Huntington BeaL.j, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 024-144-04 024-144-1 l 024-144-12 j UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LEON DUBOX Cl~IILCUTT/SCHWARTZ Post Office Building 20222. Deervale Lane 1303 Oakgrove Road Huntln6ton Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Westlake Vil., CA 91:162 024-144.-12 024-144 14 024-146- 01 MCCALLEN/Sr.BOO ANDREW STUPIN BARBARA BEAL 22819 Costa hello 812 13 to Street 2100 Old Quarry Road El Two, CA 92630 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Riverside, CA 92506 424-146-02 024-146-07 024-146-09 RUDY SCOTT ANDR.EW STUPID BLANCHE WOOD 7821 Talbert Avenue 3701 Birch Ste, #210 201 Fifth Street Hanti4tan Beach, CA 92648 Newport Beach, CA 92660 HVitingtun Beach, CA 92648 B 4`-lS2 t 024-152-03 024-152-05 MY WORTHY ENERGY DEY. CORP. MERGAIMT/RBT. SIMPE TWrte%th St. P.O. Box 4040 333 Civic Center Dr. West X, untIngtixi Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92605 Santa Ana, CA 92701 w 4: w 48 er , 1 .v' ..f '!' a'�'a Y'•,', ry o •r: LABELS 10/29/99 y (3965d) 11 2 024-146-14 024-147-03 F.k WAWLER JAMM LU ;DAVID BURRIS la t CW1e 6071 Manorfleld Drive '220 Fifth Street tU*Um Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Seacsi, CA 92648 Huntington Beach. CA 92648 c 024-147-05 024--14 21-09 024-147-10 WELLLUW OALLEGOIS LEOVARD LINDBORG SYLVIA SHANDRICK. 210 Fifth Street 1220 Newhope, Ste, 127 6021 Doyle give Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Fountain Valley, CA 92709 Huntington Beach, CA 9264'7 014--147-11 024-147-14 024-147-15 GARY MULLIGAN DOUG US LA.NGEVIN THOMAS WURZL 2,364 Third Street 8196 Pawtucket Drive 158 Argonne San Francisco, CA 9410 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Long Beach, CA 90803 024- 147-23 024-147-25 024-14 7--26 PAULhNE COOPER RICHARD HARLOW THOMAS CAVERLY P.O. Box 723 111 Tenth street 553 Temple Hills Drive Huntington Beacii, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Laguna Reach, Ca p2651 024--147�-28 Ou4�-147-3d 024-147-32 MA2JORIE DECKER WILLUM GALLEGOS BEN TRAINER 8877 Lauderdale; Ct. 210 Fifth Street 2364 Third Street Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 San Francisco, CA 94107 024-147-34 024-147-'35 024-147-36 ELMYRAIROBERT 'TERRY TAYLOR FAMILY 'TRUST ORANGE OIDAST SPEC. 122 Fifth Stteet 220 Via San ?demo 636 E. Chapman Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Orange, CA 92666 024-147-37 024-)47w38 024-148-02 'GARY HATCH CALVIN FUR1v kN ROBERT KOURY llibadmmbers Locker 31-730 Highway IIl P.O. Box 65176 207 Main Street Indio, CA 92201 Los Angeles, CA 900t.5 Huntington Brach, CA 92648 02 -F14241 024-142-02 024-142-05 LIMY C. BAILEY NER'LL E. CA'DE MARRY/BESSIE FAHRENKRUG 2 C,mt Avenue 17532 Metzler Leme 29 Countryside Box 471 a;r Horton on Beach, CA 92649 Hunt)ngton Beach, CA 92647 Trek nor, IA 51575 ' a,; i Ir :� • 1 , Occupant 209 Main "Strew Wift breach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Occupant Occupant 8treot 207 Main Street 203 Main, Street Agton beach, 'CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 9260 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 41IR Occupant Occupant 'b )Wit street 205 Main Street 218 5th Street 'j dtf�;n,gton Beach, CA 9264�' 11unt�ingLen Reach, CA 92648 f untingt4n Beath, 92648 I ;aliar-rrial ow►w*j��ba� r pt~eugat�t~ Jt Occupant i :227 lkitt Street 214 5th Street atingtakl B#aaCh, CA 9264$ ( 4w <_.�'1 [ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Occupant Occupant Occupant .2z3 a Main Street 201. Main Street 210 5th Street sentington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92645 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 0ccupaat Occupant 221 main $great 121 Main Street duatington Beach, CA 92648 Huntirgton Beach, CA 92648 Occupant Occupant f' Xaln Street 302 5th Street 208 5th Stteet , tan leech, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Occupant Occupant 224 5th Street 206 5th Stv at ', ttstos D"ch, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Bea.chy CA 92648 titO-zcupant occupant ;' tyo► B ook 222 50. Street 202 5th Street ton ach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Avntington Beach„ CA 92648 Occupant 220 5th Street CA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ' A J ,1�$i4fr Iji l�h'��lir'+�ilv f , ' .` �{' , ., � .:.,.y', a r�.,\.y,',r�l au._, ,-• _-.— ' . ,:_.,.�.•. ..y:.. ,.+il �� .,r I ti 4 � , 141 sI Ot Occu t Oncupant th a 2io S reet 216 sixt rest ►0. 48 X , Beat , CA 92648 Hunt . hoh, -CA 92648 tnt Occ and occup t fsth Street 2xr,'_.:- �th Street 229 si �'.x�ati t. Beach.. CA 92646 !!Unt , 8 ch, CA 926413 Hu each, CA 92648 Occup Occupant t 228 Si rZrt;aet 128 Sixth Streat ;. 6sWP CW 92648 Hunt�,�a A 9264 8 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 wupant OccuIjant ,_)cc u ark 14 S i X t h 513 Walnut 51.9 via��ut Yrkt . Bea�92648 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Leach , CA 92648 ; I { } 1 i t i I t t s• .+rh J'•i i t k'',Y 4.J V 4 !',' "i;,l'.: l}: , '.' ,; ,.' - ..__ __- __ __ _ �.,���,� --_ - .,.�Yr►MILLA •� " , 00 dmmft P'•1 � ills" �. A / A� 0Ccl1pat1t ? 7.6 �-xth Street: HU11t. . HeaCh , CA 926y8 FIRST CLASS MAID � 1.a901 Notice City of Nuntin Eton Bah Office of the Citq Clark P. 0.Dox 190 Huntington flaaah, CA 026 si reLI, firiic;h , r.A 926iE3 • i FIRST CLASS NEAR rj11 111,l1„t 11i!„L„111111!!,1111111:1111I11; �.'Y•,,, city of Moo of Ow CkV Clark P. O.saw ISO , CA , r' Occupant: 5I4 Walnut; ALint . Beaeh , CA 92648 SST CLASS MAN.. 4 4�;�er ; f' wp.Nr A. �S •�, �o rya L, y y .r 'i 1117 r� Cfirinpant: `a 501 Walnut ' Htintingt_on Beach, CA 92648 ;ra JJT, CLASS MAIL t I .;r:',L' � .� ':r•'`"°I' f�l'IIII�IIIIIIIi�lll�ll�ll�l�l��'lllll�llllll�lil�� Gtv "ftm* OI at,do� Ciwk P.0. �%, CA 026" i L `I{•f�� Will I I liCA '•r�r FAST C"SS MAIL '•i 1. A 1•0 ti `e, Occupant � 1.51. ?'i fth Strc.ayt aM j /. ^}w � ■• �, a ,. ut14 seacri. CA 92�i48 w � 046 IA i 4144 :r,y 4 Yf, 4,, y�. 1 Iir. 1''irI� i�'�• M.ti,J�.) y. 410 �,1. y�� �°' ,••. art. :� ,;'; :� .' 4 '.� „3' N 41 k 1. 1 +� MAL -----� 11�ir�rrlrlrlf��rlr�il��lr�l�lr►�ril,�,�li����► rr cayof VFW `y��_�• omw aM; T �, 'p.0. ux ISO CA VMW �ir_cu'��t�t • 1.8 S th t t'c c! l���rtt,.:Ltl�;�.ort 48 r �• CLASS MAIL ,.._..�...� ff�i'<�rililr�l�irlri�lirfri�rlrrri r�r .� rr sr r�, 202 'ith 5itrooL 92648 IL lrr•n 1�..', +v y� � , ` *•,�,'•,'*1S • IyI 1 '1 ' 1� a G + Lo , ell. '>� v Ilr �,? •'''�."fit�,,r Wl• P � .. �.. " 61• ^ F M .� Pw :?v •iwM�" �'�,Nh• .:r,'�,L`hr'1� F+,'.,, "w+�� '�:c..+��' '�Irv�.Q d1'i" 1n:n�'�;.:.L'M..*'yLf��.�J All; O�'`dil+�'r�w.�.+�1'�,�'.'��:� .�"!"�'1/j'6• -'4�M �'�. ' � r t ?� f t r i• ll h•j l y Occupant . Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 :fr�'rr t �`1��r• U Y" SST CLASS MAL i� ~ �Of ft aLy (Ir (ryJ 4 00mvil, CA 1 �` i 'f d,r •i ,1�'� 'Iry.•,i +�l err• , U-cupant: tl .I • 206 Sixth Street ch ,Hunt- .. Bea � ,�1 9 4 + T CLASS MAIL L f Roilke 1. 00.Dim I" mwNWilgiton wrch,CA 02 • •t Occupant 206 Sth Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 FPSIr CLASS MAL 4 vr 'W�f ��A •i'^ , f �� � y `..+�f ti� *,��1 w I. r t ' •,! r jp�lYM� Fr't, 'r hr�Lw •41fdr h �4 1 r i ! ;t11w Y ,r �h . a, �i�lAM a+,M stredkt I• ntBmaoh, ' i•,, , :,;. a ,,'; y{1,1 •I r;1, •�; ;;w ; 1 ,. T Occupant 221 Sth Screet Huntington Beach, CA 92648 a. r ". OUAILi • II1 1 l ii 1111111111110 LAA I III , , �1� „ f lltrrhl,r1l#,u !PUT Y Occupant 223 Sth Street Huntington Deach, CA 92648 ST CLANS MAIL �, t• 1 r rtrl ,I,Ilu,l„Ile, �r � „�r ,e, „r rrr .....,.�� r ry f� Ni4$ T�.!' 1,'" `P iLM1e, ,*AAA w!'VS{ xV 1, v k � ri ,lti � j � � �{�w��i,'• IS�,�� r..i�S: ,r N J .i1r�� � �Vi�i' w a` �-4�� ' r ��'J �2� l� �'�Y avr,�4 �• /�ll; Yt�.'112 1'! �{'� '1 �, ro� �•skr��rn,y�� k�P, �,�:, Y;'" �'�41��"1 � �Syr,, � ' ��, � � � , •r�, � v V 1�1• vi1� y�,}te. � ,�t/4 ,.M ,,�i' � r ��� 14. E v' + r'' ���� �'�, ,�" ,►� . 1 l' P ,.'M"• F :�'�:i��,1,''f�M1 i i '1 � �� • ���„ }M � 19 jY' 11'� ' 1' 1 Ilk r �� Ocr, it r' y I1 1 1 it t 11 1111 11 l�t tr u r tt ��i t tt n t1 f, Y r I ' � '•• ' Vie , Y 320 FJjF S i � . Hu"t Beach , CA 92648 ASO, M 1� F1 111111loll If III11114111141 111l1`,. 1t II1i1r11I,1tItllti a �rN�tr loop OCcupant 204 Si3:th Street tii,nt . E s ch , CA 9 648 i *r MASS MAL ` 1 •� a• 1. 1 lyi Yi�i.,r,�� � �{y .�. , .��. r �`��l'` Rd'.}). .,�.*'.q pT..r ••v�s �i� ":WRnc •r fs:�'t(�jj1 ��,, ,�,h '. 1 'Y Ih k 'w'S" 1 �4ti *y �"�• 1 1�,1� t r.7,r, r �1 h 1 �r ',�f '.�r , ',���M��i%"W R"� '� ,K h F �, •,•4 1. f ,1 '1 1t w� , * r f ,.. '�� � , � r � A . +, fr e MCI ,. �, ,R t •' ��� L i�J�ly�y M r! ,A rjl°�'h, i' .� :11 41y!„jj',i!r�1}.:t�•fA,'',r '� �,If; ;� "� ; . � .T Y ' r s'Pi'~ • 4lr� 1+l�r �rl..r` r ', r•,� Y, � � .,i�14!„ 1,��'' Ip' �-•..L 1• ,�� ,�.s ',�,1��, '�'y rjl�lmM'` {iF":II�•(Yu1f �,' , r �, r1. hI' +J1 1 ,0 3WX'N �M.I,a�rYur}.+,��v1.w�•YM, •,�� , tali 04, ki" or 1 �• i• Occupant Jai p 7/a 1n 320 Fifth Gtreet •; Mont - CA 92648 VWSSUAL ,„ '�•'^��' •"'"�--• 1 1111 1 I !11 11 11 11 1 !111 i l i 1111! ! OcCUpant •r 204 S- xth Street; Hl�rit , Beach CA 92648 f ' i LASS AIL I �, �,;y�:�.;�rj;,' II111„�I�lIlill,Illlt.11l,IllJ{»IIIIIIIIsIIfIIIN 1 • , ` CA 92m Occupant; 122 Fifth Street Hunt . Beach , CA 9 �64A r MAN ~+..� I�Illlll�lllf�lll'illlll�llllllllllllil��lllfllllll) +• liar 1 i i OT�• `'0�WiA" Mo I � !� h� 'tt4 } " {.., .y, R r ,1' 00, �•��:1�n', }�i fihu ry ,#d,��Yl 1— r ,�,fI •* � vxl r„.�w ,w +ooyy4��, 1f i �'>• yi 4,1 1 ,5. i r° h"'� �� ',a 'tirll��/ °f , �, T � '� �� h�}j.� 4t� •.Z �� "'�� �f 1 Zr 1 r �� ��4r r 1 ,.. d H+�� W,�° ,�� �f r Ir *c ��i i!i , . ° J. •i x � �+ w� �' S7 ,,,, 1� ► 2 , 11�" r * 41� A f� •1 ,fit ;�f�. yy y�ry,.'�f•°1 1f f,(;�e' `}:°''' r 1 } .� ..• 1� 1 I j� ,rr , Wry ' • �y A AJT� � i 1� 1 .� `� Q °l�i ��.,Wl• T�' �L +fir. to Of r v' �.ir•. 1 i r .. wr," �„,�r � n t occupant a r, 106 Fifth SCrest Hunt , 8OOCn, CA 92648 SASS MAL ,'}�•';',i` ,� •' .' -, '. �', ., �......��.�, ��t1111111�1�1111�11'�tt�ll�lllllll'If i"1�'11I11'1� ....�,..,,,,..,. r: 324 Fifth Stre6t �9 � Beach , CA 92648 , k ,PMT CLASS AL �y 4 !! ! f f !!!! tt' ~`"�`�•• 1�lflltl�111lIIII III lit III 1�1ltitlf�1111111111�I1�1i 1..•..(jr�N.1'=IMF• �� w.,i� •r i. ...ir++uru - M �i1.' .i .� i. PA 100�*Own 11 1 Occupant: 228 Sixth Street Hunt . Beach,, CA 92648 FIRST C"86 MAL III 1111'I1I1i11A11111111111 1111111111111 .........�.•� .J„ r �f�lA,.�y'�r`o ,y,, '� r�e'.'•Y4Gra` �,� '� xV-�h E• t , �41' •�� ,� � � , r�.... .,fY � ��� , dF � ''M�,� ��y. ;� r �' :�M• i �'�'9 d! ` '41 " 'r rr, � P'MI�, � tl�. i Zp��� i t "'1•� R 1.r r �� • y r 'A�''Y r v�M �.' r r r 'Alt ., � r •. 'r + , �W ��� �4� .��k � { j i �1 i' '�' . l �r� l � �'r 1 a,4yrK t•r i�,S" �,� o.. r rarY7.7 ,rr�. C n •rtr 1 � r',1 \?' '••�, h r ',., !. ' 1 Fya°1 +f�i +•!i ; ice{ r k��Sd J`�'A'` f '� •: "S~ T r'��il 1 �f• ?�t ' '1' ILAJ qw �4 t� *„rX i7� „�.r •,i .r'ti! 1`�ratMl'.�l'•�rr.r,•4 r ZOE i t � ~ r + �F y y1i 061 w •a d A AIM r . �''•� ^ l, l Nrtisi i..7. 4 Occupant 208 Sixth Street Hunt , Beach , C 26�38 l � 1 FIRST CLASS MAIL try of tom ►sewh } . q"ke of 00 CKY talc ` P.a.$ON 1po M�tw�t1R 8004,CA 9 Occupant 210 yixLh Street Hunt . Beach , CA 926,18 r r r , r FIRST CLASS MAIL I It lilt,It It III kill 1!„I,,I,i,ll,,,lilt,,l„�„1,11 , � 1�r{�• EI,�,+�� r gal,.•,:'11.,,.erHy.ti�., . .„1, r,.,r," M y„f , „•..�� V ,nry I ,,� � � ,� �W': ".fir"4�4 p''�.. TO ',Ni 00 .:q "u t w.rl�K•.w� ••r.r•n �• .i�,..• a�r•..�... i ��,.1rr. I . � � , �� �"� pr;►.41���� �� 1 . i 11 `3f�'�. r Occupant `•�`'��4+ ��' Hunt , ach, CA 926,48, CLASS MAIL lit It mllI�"I IIIIIIIII IIIIIII���II���fI���'���'��� r A 77 07 ko Occupant �'r }i!�«'(��,'� ..�y�' • ��v,���NMw:i.+��i..-,i,.M,irl ilY�i..iµ�.r �/�..���.�•I� irl 1 Ll.rr,1.:.hl�.r J , 1 lryr',� .r:... .. _ +i���•IY�I�w--Ilr:ua�� u.rr�-r�i i r..r>•fr.��.+� .. `�l�,r,`•'ir';��1. r1 •� fir• 1 ,', f 1 1 1 1•f'1 ',� Tf ,1,,'f V� '! •r , 1 i Y jw Ir1'. r• Sixth Street Hunt . ach , CA 92648 CLASS ►I . ,,^ II1I 111IIn111110111111111111if lit III Is11 fill 11 � S` ' 1r111:1'111 ,• { l��c. Yri�F4 '1 16 Sixth trreet LA Lint . Bea , CA 92648 r t , FOIST y L r ` r.�rl rYetlrY", ,,' ' r ' PO Ir. • 1+ + .� p t �`►t'"' 305 Thi Street , . ..,M., aunt: . ach CA 92648 1 '` ' ' � .�.� LfASS MAL ffi f fff f ff f f f �f ff f� ffi of Wahl" WIL A� fir' ��::�,. ���• .:, Occupant: ;�R.'•' 224 Sixth Stl'Iet Hunt . ach , CA 92646 :4 1r , FAST CLASS MAIL jimlob io -1 1 I' , CA 2260 occnipallt Unt . 3eu , CA 92648 ! t �LL d' m� ST CLASS-JAIL «.' - (I� I rJ • , ,',I 4 ] 1. ( Y r 1 u Jy,'r4 YI '.I �w ATTACKN$NT 1 COUNCit.. A: *N -84 N A tiDam Y,•1, ' 11 'P,i , r TV City Cowell Members� r tT:'•`��:'�t'� ,,,•` C4 k, City AftlAlStrator r^•v 1 !' i Tyt;'a�• Douglas La Kelley Deputy City Administrator/Economic Developme t r.7 1F1%M19 (;L4XT PROGRAM FOR MAIN-PIER PROJECT ARE t coanail h1by? l Yet O New Polizy or Exception 00 1"t O►ipmnmrndrtiorif Armlyais, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: , . x k�. At its J0 't;, Ludy ston with the Planning Commission on January 25, 1988, the City R Co 1: Staff to prepare a recommended program of financial incendves for '''' o i subject to the seismic safety ordinance. On February 16 1988 a s',"a'::' 1 t ift �flw'��� �lmpcov�ernnent loam program for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project 'A � d foe' Counci) review. This rEport recommends modifications to the 9-1 , �1 with respect to this program. 1Y .A* Area cuff to implement a facade Improvement program within the Miin-Fier i: A a "dexaonatratian black" bounded by Main do Sth Streets, Olive and Walnut Avap". Appt" theide rehabilitation grants for eligible property owners in amounts not to g 1SV625 b liaear Front foot) for 25' single-story structures b 11250 ( /`1itat front fact) for 50� single- tOry structures 0 21,875 '��flinear front toot) for 2S' two--story structures 121 43,7� 75/11swar front foot) for 50, two-story structures e ats for eNmed We and rear facades will not exceed $200/linear foot; must be tanlied to sWe and rear improvements f) $SO,000 for corner property at Walnut and Main ($625/11near foot for side And front facade-, $200/linter foot for rear facade) 3) .approve a budget not to exceed $900,000 for the facade improvement grant prggrarj. 4) Approve change in the funding source for this project from the current CDBG realdential reht+obilitation program (previously approved funding source). InstearfuAtJn:74A this project 'from fuoda been pzid to the Agency by Mole Corporation for land � acquisition for the 'town Square project. S(pC� Al, _ dr.'.", I!� y 8�dcY.,•, ` fir' ^ ,� `1�.t ! 1 Y'a�'v i r, '`l�l� r�y I w 1 for those ' r" "'•� ,, RM1�11 �iatgtn in a1't�ollnti ague! to t1� facade► groat program .; than who prefer to omtruct new improvemiants rather t n rehabilitato t0 `i _,:�'. , ,4 i }, ~pbiiemonts only to the extent that re Mbilitation or new ie�ed +square footsge above that which owrrently exist, on the 44taemtration blwk. to is SM r ltction of In-lieu parking fees to be aseemed for required parking. f #swittud over a five-year period at an Interest rate of 8%. bixi lly, staff recommend that the Federal Government Section 312 loan program be ugilt to assist prerty ownerp in financing their seismic Improvements on this block. m was to be ct,_,pled with a facade $rant program using Community t Black Grant fwWl. Implementatim proceduries for this progrum, it became apparent that the 313 loaf rani requirements would be difficult to administer for this ` W VW9 the use of Community Development Block Grant funds (which require am prevailizW wages be verified for each conatructiort project) also would 000"it administrative problems and additional costs that could limit the success of the t t will ide a facade improvement grant to participating property r ` a prop+ 'fir 4!%!LVW%;t to tlnela• rlpiiance with Seirmic and building code requirements, "P gtttdeli , W maintenance requirements. Grant funds will be disbursed 1.,:''" tt ptvpwe nts are completed in accordance with an Owner Participation Agreement to Into betwom the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and t1pat1r property owners. r. 'nb11C fnt' • • pftivemente we recommended to support the demonstration block facade 1 1 tdmorit plant including undergrounding of utilities, repaving and lighting in the alley, ;;: ngatiop of this program, a numbers of property owners on the Main Street °. "� be. , #qq W"tift black requested consideration of plans to construct new • .00,0000 on the site. 1t is recommerAed that financial assistance, at the sane level .� facade irptovementsM he provided to property owners who wish to construct Ater 'idlnp an the Main Street edge of the demonstration block. New construction will, be required to follow downtown design guidelines and meet all building code re-4i �L__nentai. ' As an additional inducement to the property owners to participate in this program, it is re mmardW that parking requirements be deemed met for all existing uses and for all new um, pm.riding that the square footage which currently exists is not exceeded. Any addlttml building area created through rehabilitation or through new construction will be spired to meet current parking requirements onsite or pay in-"lieu of parking fees. The In-lieu of parking fee has been established at $12,000 per space to be adjtwed annually at the rate of oonstruction cost increases determined by the Engineering News Records. However, to provide an additional inzentive for property owners within this demonstration block to rehabilitate or reco:urtruct their buildings, we are recommending that the in-lieu of parking fee be reduced by fifty percent amortized over a five-year period at an intot oust of eight percent. r ,J� ^k ry}�� d 1" {{ �, ���ffw rJ' ,}.*'1t ti.', It•. y ., 'R" h r •� l�ylrl r a. I r..' „1 �r �r ;17 *' O�q. L I..��' �,7 '!Y 7 � d Ch',1',: � r4 1y. I•' ,. tf A ` 1`� �r J � r', rar`� ,I.e �'1'? Tj'�rdddd r r � l y'�1,�. �1 f�ri.,,+1 r , ✓•,� r r 111111.` l A M�'"Mi 1 I• t W„rt ' r, .��'�r ..4 4 �„ ., ��.�'r�.I �JI l!�•:}",'` '' r��•,.•? �, •� �� ���sr,r ~ r 4'�'L'�(#'�:d`q.�' .,� �'.� r` �. ` ..���'� , µ ,� a. J�g1,,,'/'i,, a��'.,. ,+ V � � �i '� >i'r ', „ ��'��:i /'.tr `t "•�'�','r iZ,My� • �VVV UUU t 'r r1' mr'y `7a;,i�' t i ,+'r� + , \j t+'k',ir •'i,lv yV ��. 7 ''"Y r. ' k�5, w'..u �flb7.r'�ilt':rc:� program vW parkins incept:vea be malt available to `monmtion b (or a a*-,year parlod. t Fftv*me have beet en of!ective atimulua for downtown - "� 1 ►. ' cltios l=l eta Mara. Fullertan. end Santa Ana. ft.pvV' w will depoW totally on the &grew of participation by " in ft aphatait or staff, eAe incentives proposed herein will Serrate '• prut�� i 1 • ftm Corpaatation for lwd acquired for Town Square project 1 rev : $1.ON+1, ) '` ' t, iq!rr ►poopOptonw.for facade rehabilitation or new construction. This approach +,, 1 t 'otlaw for ow* deterioration of the properties within the demonstration ` k* 1WWh available on a loan basis iutead of in-lieu of a grant or make loans and/or ato avalbble in amounts lase than recommended. This approach would limit the of';rof arty mm participation and make the project more difficult to 00 , 1 1 r 1 : ,Mt?' Y ?' :pror prt: et Budget. uV. . �;try''>,�+ i:r•' � ' .' PC }}fi�rr bb„/l t Y:. 4272h n- �,r"•lw � •;� r. 4 , fAx+ i r 'y �' � 1� •: I �r 'rt /` lard ' ;. r y « �; s ti• i `� i 1 ,!�.1 v �I,�1 P � �f t���• '' ��. iM�R N� � e� ,� � 'fY���I. {I , .n ,, /�, r. �'J`p`q�"'�.� �::ar f ��y�I{i'•:•9► �� rrA� `"���,+�±��7. • Ffh „� •fi l0l+r , ,• In �� "',�.'`, p.'Ii,l O' '� ',11^s 1'��+'y r 1M�A,r'r }•: fi }J �1 • '!�' 1'�Ii JI 1„ ,r, «Jy .�� +. 4 !.�c � lr� � �Ir w' J- !t ''' ', *5I' 'Y i��rS6r��i�'rr�: li���,Ji •T '"o I �,• n .,,1 , ,, �•. � '! r•� +�4j�'�,`, I + � «� •T ,�h#,. yJ 4� .•rl !� '/ GI, � ✓Yl•h1� ' � 'I �,1 '' �fr3r•♦ ., rk 4i�''� r'�YI i� 1h •'rr YY+•:'h"r r':i�.'�•�,>I�O Irt I rr ' I a iy� Mil' ry 4 J ,) • { / "' �. t yet { ♦h 1 , .JP Il ' I FOR D BLOC ..ill, r,,; ;b i,y `r !'� .:i��i IW:. • Sr,! � d' •i 2 s 251 lot $31,250:u 5DI lot r $ 875 LF21,875 = 25' lot $430750 = 50' lot Must be applied to rear do Mde rehab work 51 *Pt I!t�ir,}�/l�l ,'�„i .'1'�li*�i�rylhi nrr��ral/��Ir.Y��wIW� uMag .���r�.�����r • �i' •n 'vo stat ` "t 300 Q $ 625 $1870 500 215' $ 876 Sim 1,128f $ 200 $225,660 . , At 8a, �szs 5O,000 ..w 1,723I $6519225 yy �i ahank Toone Two Story 192' x $875 $168,000 $819,225 Pr rdWD"Ign/Administretion Cbst $309775 3824' r y • - 1 r � ; � e T���t � .,i f � f �'�- � 1 Y r ?r�•r � �+� Mr�•4 r A y^N I'!1'f a i,� r r :74�R4 f`I°r '!� r r' n"�}. 1 1;rir r P fI r, ui , . A •) �'i1P r5 aoi "� A.Y��� f � *� {�, i }i +' r, f V' ,= .y' , ,r: h � 'w !7 tM; ern ►' +ti, n � f � fh ti'T��'� i �� {., rr� I � `6 ` / f " 4 r✓ ` ,rv4 �1' "r r ",',l , .r'f�I 1�+f 1{� �1 n�, i � ','} ir' i�f ° ''.tip • ';t i VAS S L 1\JR� A PO1 ENI ,may i . �.���� �M * r 'n mom IX prolObted a comunication from the Finance Director trans- ` Vatios, of the Public Facilities Corporation that thr CI t 0• 9► . i ntont b the Public Facilities , Corporation of MichasT �r M . 401itibs Corporation Board ,0 Directors filling a . r a to expiring duly ?4, 1991 . 17 f `*rr 7 , 1998 from Michael Tierney had been submitted to h`+ r ►` vie ity Administrator' s December 16, 1988 (City Administrator f off, y�r M . � d Wane a potion eras made by MacAllister, seconded by Silva, to " ,rod .. i htn f MichaelTierney # , eh�� a t o thae K. to the Public Facilities Corpor- � ' t cm Wrd of, 'Directors . The motion carried by the following roll call vote: A:y'(S: MacAllister, Green , Wint"halt , Bannister . Mays , Silva , Erskine Kane •1!'iy'' SSgll I.•'. r f�/' 9Mrt PM)&UN FOR eengQ APPLY LURflffiT ,,,•,, I .r r .LIEU PARKING....E.[E5 TO BE �. l ; Cterkr rosebted a communication from the Deputy City Administrator/ x t 06vol-ppment regardi n a Facade Grant Program for the Main-Pier bt' Project Area . J 4F Tho, ty City Administrator/Economic Development requested that the Heal t�h d $A Mlty Code 33433 Report, and all related documents , be made a oairt of the 'r; lri1 tthisenand, Redevelopen# Specialist Consultant , presented a report . ,,.. ,A . R tit far City y Council Action dated December 19, 19$8 submitted by pout r •,/, City -AtWfni strator, had been submitted to Council in the City Admin- {. ii"is December 16 , 1988 RCA. A on was made by Erskine, seconded by Bannister , to take the following s 1 `Ihthorize staff to implement a facade improvement program within the Main-Pier Project Area on a "demonstration block" bounded by Main & 5th Streets , alive and Walnut Avenues , (2) Approve facade rehabilitation grants for eligible property owners in towints not to exceed: a) $15.625 ($625/linear front toot) for 25, single-story structures b) $31 ,250 ($625/linear front foot) -for 50, single-story structures 0 $21 ,875 0875/linear front foot) for 25' two-story structures d) $43 ,750 ($C75/linear front fr.ot) for 50, two-story structures i „, � p� + w,�ytl• pISY�' ") ( �!� t�, �� Y r Fri• r ; �1 Mir 3�,r' �����,r �,��1�v r�M.�h�,�x�A' i � r ti'• i r Y•4 V v�' �>r, r+ Ail '� '� rR' ,�, �,1r � ` r}i',6 k ,��,Y ri (5� y�� L�S y.• yTl' T pp �Y,� � Y b 1.1, t� 'F �� /f ��1�•�D Vti. V tr�t `7rf L "'' Tr + Y �,.�R-r �,►r V� v�i, � :,1 b +.� 1 j.� ,,f v'>l/. ,i �'i.r�' � T'? k.�, Y� '�j,�S�i�+''r 1,�' bliv i '1a* lot 6 , �, u,AV � �'� � ° , i ! k' Yr .� . �• ,.-♦ .'.,w M►+�6��r ,P• It r WK1 f+Ll '44 a40�1 4 + i f x r• y r - . C i ' �y ”! �� _11��a,"1'aY . 1 pry l�1 vjj , 1i" �' 1 • 1`"V Nairk � '' ,a►;� ,�; .��.; j. �� Aunr.:LngCo�l Beach , CA ` AS, MAIL ,J�f^, �, , ;�: ' � Il�i.l.11,l,fl:tll��l1� 1111�h111!{„il�illlfllil,l �:r• K2�A v .t A 1'+ 402 RA r , a , FRST CLASS MAIL 111111 Ilk 1111JI111111101 T 1 � IF �1 ` w�+�!' n` v �ti ,p+,n YI� ' 1'•Ir� � 1r1�,•�• .�"' 's Hunt . 388C CA 92648 e � p+���, / .IMF �!� � / (� 4, '�• �,•�, ,�'+��!��N�i Al rrl Mil ?A � 1. '' �!�.�� ,• W.ti'f I k.. .p • ice .1 Y.. r I rl� � �y•' ; ' ,.I,r' ice"I I. .. ,. ,,•.:i �Y'' :"iK v.,1•�s iy�.J'�r+ry�;.,')Y�f•++G 116„'rlr.ld � 1«.��� jw. 1 t, ..'. :•.r.'Y N` �*,I .l•i, :�' till'5'"�+� "Y,: Occupan Y rf..et Hunt e�i c h CA g 2 6 4 H � � r RT 4 MAN,. st F 1 , ,�la Y '', j l , •�� �V 7 , A"w "�.� •'Y' r, 1 r , ,s :..a. .,Viw�.r�_ 'Y�'�/� 1 J 1,.`,'s `i';•,',.� :'sl `• "+ ` � �\ 11,.E at A� ellch, CA 92640 r! 'r, 1 01,4 � r ��•,.. ,�.::.`:,�i��� r rr�r r r �� ,� r r rr�r it r rir � ri -�-*�-•�•�A(�,�� 'A 1'•� .,11•' + � '\',f.%F`M V•. �Jr.fN��Y.OMYW��. •',R r, 11 � Y •� 'ioccupant d Wo ' 1 i05 Max-n St: ASS MAL i + 1�1,1 `' �'. : ""'" `"' "1'1111'1���flll�llr'ir�il�rir111��rrlrrr1l11rIClr� ' r °" � v'�� � � �! 1��4'� { C:�', ! �� Xirni '•h"���'',�,ih'", *� 1,' � �'��� w�'y r�' � 3V: e, V�e7, : �� h �� ���� � 5� .� � •Y q11 4 '0 moxo) mow' ' all I+w� :11 �'.r r+r'w.i� ' t�� L^5'r •m . . �'S, '4. ..n.y " yy v �u j, 1 • � r � 4 i i 't r Occupant 307 Main street Hunt Bach CA 91648 Iris„ �,�� •�, � '� .�"�' '+'„ � \ .R.r T-� MAC rs f J4 Y V / 1 14\'ai r rccupant i 317 main 9 ©et �, ►68 MAC .1 �•+ 4.hYAry �,, ,.�,� .• 1 •�•���-- 1 iltif 1 f 111 Il 11 11 1 1lli 1111��11111 11 •-� r�� t M �..�• ra•'���r'�. `OopKrA too Occupant �, • `"'"'` •- 510 F,8 C i C's t . Hwy . B ch , CA 92648 � r r , .�• i' CLAv%P MAL r 4 41,,�� Y AY•�11MW1/ Yc�r J.1�1K.1 r�{;�ld.:-.f .. � _ 1'•.ar,�iS:�. � � � � � -Y � _...---- - - - _ _ r j.%•�r. ,•`L'A•L^'�1 �+•r I 11 • .'`i 1` � � , • r • , 1 • �,1.^•fl} 4 4 h `', r ,9 1111;� - 2•T r4 'n�4 , I�•• (, r f�� �CC1�'?'fi, f .��, ' �� 7` ��' ;'1�,'„1 �Y,•1,..I,l ',,•Y y.;ti �.'I•?L1l,In• •r�• r. r.. . i rrh uY.rle,L hrJrn• fw, 1• 1 L p "''7r�e 'y1�t�.. r.S{�• ',r•�:' ',. LJ"' r ``. , 1 i occupant ��v�l".:r,:,. �, ,•���, , ` at 321 Main C 92 1junt . ea h , IOU PAS MAL pop Of �Lq.�� +'. � _ F � ` '�11111IIIIIIIIiI�H�lll�ll�l�llllllllll'llllll'11�' fj,•,• IrN 4�; CA , •f � r. k-N h pf i, )rcupant 4:;r,' ` ��a �•iainIP it /ne- X CA 9lr-,';A '.+ iurlt3.ngt =tt, ST CLASS ` ' i im. m� � �'� ( 11 •�,,, illlllllililillllilll111111111111l+Il�illllllillllli ..•'µ N. '•irk f 1 ` +?r -.too �•��� , •` /ram• lay . APet Niint . e h C11 92648 -�'hM1r'+'lLy,'J•'�� ' •''',�, � r 'rlrll�l )) ! ! �rll 1 !31 '� �' r r 1 • •K. 'l11/rl/1r11 �Ilrll`li�lll � ' rl�lr! ,Jet Yrl, w'�` .° r. 7... , `� +� I . ,,. • ��,� , ��h'Fi.�V-y 1 1 , A'' 1 "� ♦ J I ,.� + 't'i n'�' it,-•,' �la+a i«'�'� if Ir ton, . , L..v/� ,�a rl' l A rY9.�.WrF'..a�Wi''A 11� r1�1 'Y.�wa .. ,�„��pa'14. +Fr J. 1' J �,rh 'W�,•+( lw�1 Y Occupant �, ''+# ►;;.,Y:;', �. 14intIngton ach, CA 92648 `''11 A,, Fy� •pray, •, , ,�� µ.• 1r, ' •f I 1 ''�� "` '° `':��:. ,;. ,.1 , -,.��• : � Il�l����f�l�ii���f��fl��l I I If I I� I If I ..�,�.. l ,j.. , y;� �'{�1'• IOW+-''i J:, OCCUPa 11 t r G i3 1,1rIiY M L AI , r ILI, +ram �,�',�y,`�}'/ r ` -+-�--�--•�.,�..y... IN. y��';,�`';""'• '��' � tom, I P , occupant ; ,. 319 Main 3t et tiUnt . BeaC CA 92648 r � } ,,,��'y',c������,,r�y' �� ,�,,, ,�+,, .;1• L b ��r�orrr�r r� rrr rr����i,jL .!�,����� �W'.yr ° �������•A�h#���;F� L' 'S d'��y,�.°Y S,��y+��� \ +\hA,° �fn hlyr,`"''.'XWY'�' hY !;, �' n� �, 1 A 1f.'11. "'I`r''' '•. .' '� + �.nFr¢�� R, ,�, d, ,�, �•�R��' NFl�Ve- 1•�y f�'R �.'� • y' i,��r YYM ,! r• ..•y. 'u�«i f al��j�, 'h 1 �',►�mt, '1 wy �" j ,.r '`,,"� k�f•' .� ,i��!�'^" rt°'.,•yF ' •'�fi� .°.'' '�+n:r 1 ''1• 1�t��:' a., ��e•� ��,� .Y,L�1�` �• •�• !=^,"LIF,},L 1 w 0 00 ti i + nY, •. , of J'T! � y, � � ,. , r;:# � i•� y `' � +' � •r, I r� lie ,��r, ,•�'n.` �5,, � r.'°.,Y'^ .1. 1' 1 T�-' �• .� 'PPS�,� y I' AP'�1�5!° I' �I�a'l.1.�5"�1 A �.. '/.' 1 .. •,' � 1A ' WAY a�.ti • ��a.,•.�,F.N'+1`ti,:!.r,r '�� � Ira FTw: i� ?il'a, ,�• �•� .r,,:•u ir. .'.7k i � !Y a .I Occupa a in Strew �,.,�i�.. ,.; ',� ,, ,�,�,, '�, riuriCi�► tan C ' • MAIL .r � ILti A it Mir;.,. '•�.� �rt ••� °, ,U �!•;,� T r hccupa 303 li in SLVOct , Hun tJ, ton Peach, CA 92648 i 1 LA is I1 ,;1 pill111 11111111111111110 ! MCA 2200 ` J may: +• �•�" „�.• to � ° .• ` r `� � 119 M in Street/ Hunt $each , 91648 j I ti • tST CLASS MAL Ih�n���rt�ll„t1�1111I Is 11111 of 11111 1,1,1,loll I I rV..Aaal�ii. r + "r 4, hhI�r ;.Il rf!!'��' r')�,,,�J � lf�l� , �1 � '� ✓�' 1T 1/) ',�' h 1 I•`�� Y,�I 11 Y � 1S` 1 �f ( 1 IC. 'r N � ,Y,t�'y'1 hj �4�y�� �_��i��' �'"L,.�i�' �N1`�"r���'RY�J� �,��i rM1f..,..r, �� f't� , � �wt,}1= ,r,r•1 �;i�'•��. `+ , _,_gE{'�rrl�Y,1" k�I ! �'�'+� y,, i►,�. �� 'l�`,+ �1 ,i } r ,r!,1 r..^l rj + r ql� 1 I,. µ'.ai ',rr' Olf'�::• .�' R/'i1 �4 r Ti�� h' 1� P � � � �l.x'1! ':Y '�+ rpl M`? ,�% , V"Iw +r ..K .fiU�(Illb• I J. �_. ' : �,...• .N.fv {,Ii.JI^6' . Y :�r.. 1'•��n}'1. r ' J ,bpi••t .,� 1 '�a�� :, .��� l``1►Yea i .� ' 1 •' ,'i�''k �'Y `r ,M•' :. ��. �, ��. ;. h Irk f Tit r V S , 6 024w'{ f Y ■■AA;; 11 Ire R� .` li � �'.�r♦rf'!',r {•��7'� , 1'�"�= 1+ '; :' M� ��� ' R W) .30 "PR+: �1 cx 92648 � j^a►�+s ` CLASS - MAL Aj V. I � � I r Twr 02 142- 02 Nor Cade 80103 Avenue 14idtwa City, CA 92655 'PT .CLA MA Lit #� 1 , I S �/ "h•,r '�err.+M+..f / . 1��+�" �r VK�'/ r���r� r1" }� •►'t, , , .I-.Ji x, ' 1 , •{rr tS .y,r«'{ r Y ' ,'• +. -_; I�y+}I'Fi � +�� ,i M v+�54 � '?:? �, !:"• ' .� k, a NN lb !. 1'�,... .., � !« • � 1 "r� »�/. �"r.H �+ 'rnrr {- w��� �•����,�i'r�l�`�'�u�fr� � r ��r � �,���. � .r ,I� a�a+i�',. Shandr + v r� i c k 21 Doyle Drive CA rF v TCLASS MAIL ,. �:� l.il,lu ► 1, >I�:., rl;�:.r: --.... t.• t. +r 11" 1 1 iiu nV � r1 7 �� 1+ r� Z` r 1,3 William Lamb 9542 Garfield rwe 4, Huntington Beach CA 92646 i; FIRST CLASS MAL 8 11 1'1"i1%1111111 1 It))'111111111'illl r T lid f,$V,i O' I00) .VNI. '1 1 �a t• r alksch w t' . r,. r � K`.h�A'�,,.•,,'�rrn"l,' Scher&rtz ' 4083 Ali ntemod Ct. Mpvrpark. CA 93021 / 024-144-1 n, . r +lot y,• rA Ct► l ve I7,d 1303 00-gro 1362 ., westle iU 13 y�'Y.N'T - 1 ! C 1�I 7 .. r �•ti 1 i, k rc� t k �r ��''�'�"�7 •�' l�lf, ,�r�'� 1+1 �'11<+U �, � �� �j !. � W#' '+ ��/► V w' m ''.A.J .1 1�+; 4 Y , „J..,v '� 1 �„ ♦ 1 f, 1 r, y�Z,Y, .«��4,}� YI��1{,t�••, ��1��M 1NYC,?�� n ., ry �" i � \ � � ,�hr,� t.l AV + •.iW CI ti�ir,�:4y�•., IjM1r 4p ..Y! �r. r � r^ HR. tl'nMUdSlht'iAi��rd' s1. r. r,YE4w .I�•.���yV•�Ml�'� , 1 Y 1 9` i� 010 J oy 024-146,20 cqg D.1123 Tenth Street Santa M �,nicrr CA 90 3 1 tH { ,t ppl�i Y ME XPx ED Vr A b 7C�2lk X U'• t Ott is „•;.:•, . ,fir.. ����L�?a" �F' , �1 yA w too +�~7 y t i f 1��7 1 •7 � RLY1 AVE N �. a { ,�tea,a'•�r ' p24-152-02 �s REDMOND WA V8052 kE.IURN To SENDER That -�+ 13�1 'RiverSide f 1906 Bu�t,b a�n k, CA 8 • AL,•1qy 1 I � '�F J k•r fS�1 ,l I„ '' '•� v..f.. a; ,y k 4 i v! } i v r�_,;, MIA Aft 1 Main $tree �tingtdn Bea , CA 926 '.AO MAL , JI i • ' .� a= Y .� I7Y YurraaT�.3�.�,.!�..]"`Y\* \.����Y,iY_�:�I•.y1A•�'I h'Y��lAI A.RYA'. ` ,• ,.. `.. � Y t, 1 1o11 "'" _ • '�� r "I...flJ�.YJ�s y,,;;,�{,�.;.i,.'x R� hti , �, ,6 � �.1:'�. 1 �' ` v., ,•fey i +1 'N %�1,�'t{F'' ,F ' Y. F��,• .. { r 1 •'r � •'•� P�. }„•:'J!�e�, 1�+f+� � 1'e0'�.41wn15�W�wrt„tai111',w�a�s-,,...,T � �•.' ..` .. ..'�',� ��r�.4:'+^+�MYX+�ii.. a m + r t •F Y � •�tr, `•M *. 1r Yr. ... a•r y;q„w,.,�,r r .c•!��„ r �h + (• •� •�•• �•- ••�'� ., , W r;. 024-1.54--05 deli oYnie Resorts Inc . n ,•,' .r; , 16000 Venture Blvd #1201 wincino , CA 91436 h h Pig' .. - ,'i• , :A ;• 1 �'� � nor}' • ;itii'.'t �_` •;r!lt 'i�''CI^ �t :'h' r + r,r Jr! , gy�pp•• i,1;.:-• � k L � 1 t '� 7 , µ 4 I stl•ie �'+s r 1 ,y`�,1!„��S v? 4 y" • "ti w 1 r � � ' '�, + :, .h'R'• �" lly s•+ v r�;^/v �� �.�'t �� � r .1 � �yL, Tjll�jy '�' 'ay' �'� ,•,, 1 v +4, , r,1 �4 ti .r'!• k.�C,l,l'{� '� '`� � ��5� � M ��.� r r:.'r a. ,���r . .� •h�' A ; 1 t�A 1'. ,r" '• i• v d{ T _ A4 ' Av"�. v 1ir"x r� � ` r, i+ � •yR�' " j�, ,+M' 11 n• " 4 � ' 11 Y 4'L�7' S' .r � asw'+aU5 17 AD r' t;cj,jwART7- 4 0 1,41 N 14 TUR 65 i11 11 '•4 � 1 '� i r ip ferry, Willi Hunt Be CA 92648RE N t. MArL ,o F� TO ;i� '•�[��� "��� � .�, �'fir.,;'i� � a ,� �_ � 1I 1�\��4a1';I,�r L,��ggu '• Jr\ G t<t _� ' A 24—14 4..14 hung L40$ �.71 '.d MpT]�iRR 4 1 ", o ?as t WA/09 LEE 14 90�� 4 o/ M 1C EXp FEtWAR r yk i�.• �' 11 CA 924653 Hit. IWR N TO rod wts 'S � u� �e� 1 ..��+/ 11 1 1�1�11111�111�1��1111 isI .r + it 11 11 ..' .,t.a�•�1:'�'r��-•[K.�►u'... r', , ••�.x.J if:`�..�—.. '+J��, .��, Aa •III �Y�{i.����1�' � �1,C'�1• ��„ + �" � ,' �' � y S1 � ' � ^'� � ��,��. ��� ` � . , ;1, � '�{ +� YY yy+r 1 11 ,H ' OIF r � .....' ��.. � ' ,1 �.� y�,��hiV.•'�'i�'.1'M . ��, � �� �ii1'fl16 '4� ■`I• {�ry7;.a�'/,*I;,,�4 �#}ry,� , r� '1�' le r d ► p 01 d'jth'; ��!'�I� ytir•� �'� � � rib; •�. �'e ,a.x• �...Wrw^r�• r .ry.y•■...I���y.�•'w 5 �4 t�� .• ./.+^,ylati�Y N.Mr...r•r/vP•�y■��.r■L�Y�/+�r jl P M OCT Coastal Adv Group ;I b' '`4 \'• '° 3.224 Seafarer bt ■ {{�ff'•tl rs' •��,:" venture , GA g3gU]. / •" i�lllrn � �1��1��111111i11�'q��lll�rf�t1�l�Nff��• � !• "_�, �1 � '1'A Nh'I•fhr` rr��.��Ir '.+•„1 r � ''�1�'.. � � .• .•ti.• :~ 1•. - � 1 f i�ei'`�( �� ,�,•,.� � ��� � .•��Y 7 r,r l�•„�,4 3t�� ti• ' � .• ,li�^••`�r� w\.I.y 4M�••,�;� �Ii2•f„1 , '1.'1,� �� .- . WAR" ,..�'� �1 � '~•�'��• ���� . ...•.•.�--"ram \\ . Hills , CA 9021' af � v�xl�` sT, ASS MAL Ile '; •Y� SS/,� y7i ��, '.. M '., r l '�� }, • ,}iu S•r,, .,r � � I l y {®1FF.i'r r'r 1 sl+ll!{ 0'11�1;1110% 09 e y • 024-146-14 024- 147-01 , James Lu Carolina Su=ne,s T ' 6071 Kanorfield Dr . , 9200 We tMinster #90 92048 Hunt . beach, CA 92648 NTsat:n star, CA 92683 024-147-05 024-147-08 �. i9illiam Galls ois ' ullner/Pe/ron S 210 Fifth btreeyt 355 Vingeach, "'Bara a ,-P048 HuM 4 Bosch, CA 92648 rA CA 92660 o f r Lr • 'Aft OV 024-1147-10 �,� �' --11 -� �xvia 6thandrick n Leeaqua44,1 127 6021 Voyle DT. fiut 6thunt . Beach CA 92547 ea1�ch, CA 92648 rem l�► l4. A024-147-14 02,4--JL47--29 ; ria►vin Wursl/L$Tkoxl t$ Pauline Coo r ubket Dr. 415 N. Cpnlaem Dr . P. O. box ? 3 .#*he CA 92646 Heverx Hills, 12 Ifunt . Be h, CA 92648 l e.,,;; 024-147-26 +024-147-21 iloa Thomas Caverly Marjorie Decker f4k � . 553 Temple Hills Dr . 8877 Lauderdale Ct . G-214 ' ` M 02648 rLaguhA beach, Chi 92651 Hunt . Beecht CA 92646 Ir , 024- 14; -32 024-147--33 a k ' John Tebor Trip.- usiat 2364 Thitd Street 211. Main treat 90 48 34h rranOisco , CA 94107 Munt . B echo CA 92648 'ry`y as<, 024- 147-35 024-147-36 cl -J6V - »} r'JIV. TArlot Family Trust dr. c aft Specialties 220 Yl$!' Ben Remo 636 B. Lapman .Ave . 02643 OeWport Beach, CA 92663 Orange, CA 92606 b 024- 147 38 - - 024 �.db dl s Li�0 r Calvin Purman Willism. C butt 1 ` tr " S1 w730 Highway 111 569 L . n street �. 02.$48 Indio, CA 92201 'Ventur CA 93001 w z�� r — � —d24 14$ �.�, � � 429 xaB-16 ' • rY Pac if Ic South at Realty Pawl Tahm an '4ft 1.76 P.O. Box 2 Term Annex 1264 So ma Dr . b ee, CA 90065 Los h0gel4fal CA 90051 Alta d so CA 91001 148�19 ca 024-148-20 , � 024-148-.21 .. ►od� Frances ID. Hi 'k Pacific South es r ' Real r . yl* Dr. 1123 'Tenth reet P.O. Box 209 Term Annex ;4'• Ab'lcb* CA 92647 Santa Won a, CA 90403 Loa Angela CA 900si 1 11 M •4 r:, , . ,1, n✓ .1yy4XAi ,v' y .��.YS •ly I°,i.Wr 4 - ,XL[. • '!i.a1'.�r. , r:i',� AI' � "' „1 r,.t'�1;.• .y ,' �,..I �r''tif'. , ",+ 'y• s ,IA.b•:•,"„•. �Ux .•,.. .• , r ;+ r � Jkrl'�•'' ..'�:{I,.r.a..�lwi a... i!...' .- ..- ;'. i.r•rst A.. .r�,r'f,•r'�r ,r r,,t•, 024-16,E-02 024--142-05 Nrr•le 3. Cade Harrg/6e35.`le Fahxenkruq ., rr*out �.. mow►-•#x s -• , 29 Countryside flax 471 I. hi CA 92648 ,l4i(1W .ty j CA 92655 Trey�►or, 1A 51575 Ir Q2{W142*-08 . o24-142-09 R;';ahard Lor,nva tn,C . '. Ie872 MacArthur Blvd. P.O . Bax�'{eta 92448 First Floor Long Beech, CA 40804 �;:�`.;+'a`�'M',;;.�'.�cr'• �' fit' si •A 024�-•142-12 S" 024-142, 16 i o5 - will-tam 11 am `ate�; fib. lrl�th ;t . Yivt9%I�a . pt . .' 10062 Merrim Dr . Two Corp. ,'1 ].a��z Ste 200 . 90740 Hunt . Beach.4 A 92646 Newport ch . , CA 92i560 r 1 � w "• 024-142--18 024y-142--19 SandgVVerrari lony Guenther 706 W. Balboa Blvd . 308 Sixth Street 8t AR 99824 Balboa, CA 92661 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648 024-�142--21 024-142-22 X Gregory Gonzales WI ll.i am Wangler t P.O Box 2784 212 E, Duarte Rd. dA 92648 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Arcadia , CA-S 2647 0• VW : 024--143� ~') 024- 143-04 . t't Q\ Bellew an Coastal Day Group p t a P.O. Bazr3576 1234 Seed er . St . r 84� � 92647 -met, CA 93927. ��' vevl�ura,r -A 920001 +^ A. L24- 14.4-01 ZokW T 024-144�-02 d il tt •etH" parr�akian at al 'Y -'rerett : H. Hicks k �L e " . 312' ehicego Ave. -0.0 . Box 310 wqh, CX' +92647 Hunt . Beach, CA 92643 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 Lo ,f� •a 624-144-11 024-144-12 8#" . e Americas heo'nr Dubov chi.lcutt/suhwartz �20222 Deervale Ln; 1303 .Oa�kgrove Rd . , `` r 912646 Rub'.: . Beech, CA 92645 Wostlek3 Vi l . ,CA . 91.362 024--144-14 aM�l,c+� ��Of- 024-146-0.1 + R1ebt� 3Clror+- Jung, Lee �,�� Barbara Beal Lt. 604tb tellb 17114 Manes r �•�' �,� ��' 2100 Old Quarry Rd tbro j Cal 02630 Cerritose, CA 0701 , � � Riverside o GA 92516 -146-02 024-146-07 -10 "�` ��.M� 024--1.4 6-0 9 rwttBJerry Will/ams ��� lanche wood dart Ave. 7772 Seaulen Drivo � 201 Fifth th Street r 24 1►i d 92648 1 Hunt. a ch, CA 92C48 Hunt . $a&ch, CA 92648 �5�3fii4'dnr,1. 'LLAR, 1^4 rer �,MM!\aeuAe�s►u r' ' .1 .0 ,4p- g r i 4ie � 1 02 u24--152-03 hir ;,,*Y W0 :- by Stanford 7t'h r.p �� E:ncrgy nev , Corp . i0l Thirte ,th 1t . 1321 Rivcrr ide �' P . O. Boer 4049 unt . Ba:ac : , CA '12648 Biiibank, C�i 91506 Hunt . Beach, CA 92605 24-152-04 � , , �Y'' �,; 0 4--1,92-0- 024-152-06 Olin Conley � T`� � ��;�" 14argaret/Rbt: . Shupe Stuart Omohu� ' ro 17 The Mast_t. t'i 1. 333 Civic Center Dr . West 8070 X.angdon :,ve . 4106 Oste mesa , r 92627 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Van Nuys , ^A •9.240-6- C? 24--1$2-30 024-153 � 024-153 Oe Z �:rarc,.hi.olo �� DorothY TerYr Ronald 1 fink 9712 ouinh flay Tin , 8877 Tulare Dr . B-311 123 Main Street ujnt . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 24--153 � � � 04, C 1024-153-11 ary Mulligan ' Ahmad Abdelmuti/Tacks Surf. ,Eldon Bagstad 021 Main" Street 1.1.3 Main Street 1903. Catalina Ave . , junt . Beach, CA 92648 Hurit . Beach , CA 92648 Seal Beach, CA 90740 o(% C24-153-12 - 024-153-17 024-153-18 0 lack. Gosr�ey Eleanor D raiper Carlos Cc a � eL Rit.". ?.0, Pox 23 121 Main Street 16361 ;�YakCh, Mar Ln . � . o-7 7ancho Gan. Fe, CA 92067 aunt . Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . CA 92649 )24--154-01 10%-J a ,'d 2�,-154-02 024-1.54-03 #del Zeidan 5arrabere/wood Margie Taylor L8382 P'ette on n. #1 20). Fifth Street 220 Via San Remo Punt . Bea CA 92646 Hunt . Beach, CA 92648, ��,. Newport Beach, CA 92663 124--154 024--154-0 5 � f ,16 02.4-159-r02 31yde Ci California Resorts Inc . Hui•�t . Beach Co . -Pro .Tax � E06 Walnut Avenue 16000 Ven fa Blvd . #1201 P. O. Box 7611 � iunt . Beach, CA 92648 Encino , „A 91436 Sari Francisco , CA 94120 124-148-12 024-146--0 �?5-146- 106nis Niccole Artalee Miller qg f 00 Third Street 199 N. El Cam. Real# 143F 14312 Willow Lane iont . Beach, CA 92648 Encinitas, CA 92024 Tusti.n, CA 92680 I eoms • r e4--146-12 0."�.A - 196-14 024-1.47-01 fit , )hn Teberg James Lu Caroline B�lYr�es . 0. box 2?0 6071. Manorfield Dr . - 9200 Weptminster #90 int , Beach , CA 92648 Hurt: . Bt;ach , CA 92648 We,strn�,rfster , CA 92683 I � 14-147-03 024 - 1.47-05 02..4 -147•-08 � avid Burris William Gallegois Wullner/Perr. on �0 Fifth Strec', 210 1� ii't h St:reet 355 Vista Baya Cint . Beach , CA 92648 Hunt: . Beach , CFI 926411 Newport, 3each , CA 92660 14 --147-09 024 -147-10 024 - 147-- 11 f�t��r -1'(X'�wr sronard l-indbor.g Sylvia Shandrick Ass istant League, TF . 1220 Newhcpe , Ste . 12.7 6021 Doyle Dr . 301 WA�ut• St: � . Valley , CA 92708 Hunt . Beach , CA 92647 l bunt: . Beach , CA 92648 GAti(' t of Z 4 14 7�*.12 1 No / .- 0 24-14 7-14 024 47- � w ' r-1 n g� Wurzl/l,efkowitz ) Pauline Coo ex 415 N . rramdem Dr, , P .O . Box 73 + ` e°..A a 4r4b' ��. Beverly Hills , CA-90-2�].2 Hunt , Be h , CA 92648 y 24 -� 14 ;�-2.5 024-1 47--26 024 -�147•-2; ' icharoJ Harlow Thorrmas Caverly Marjorie Decker �� �•t Ll Tenth Street 553 Temple Hills Dr . 8877 Lauderdale CL• . G-214 int , Beach , CA 92648 Laguna Beach , CA 92651 Hunt: . Beach, CA 92646 24-147-30 024-147•-32 024-147 33 11liam Gelligos Ben Trainer. John Teberv� 10 Fifth Street 2364 Third St: i-eet: 211 Main tract~ ant . Beach , CA 92648 San Francisco , CA 94107 Hunts . P CA 92648 24-14 'J- 04 024-1417-35 024-147-•36 d�a -J6�'^' 1myro/Robert perry Taylor Family Trust 'C�f . Cbett - Speci. a Ities 22 Fifth Street 220 Via San Remo 6)6 E . Chapman Ave , ant . Beach , CA 92648 Newpurt Beach , CA 92663 Orange , CA 92606 Ci• 24-147-37 ���� �� 024 - 147-36 024•-19g- ll sachcombers Locher Calvin Furman William C lclitt � ry7 Mein Street 81 �-73C Highway .ill 569 E . in Street ant . beach, CA 92648 Indio , CA 92201 Ventur CA 93001 24-148-02 024 --1.18-11 1 •6 024--148-•16 bbfirt Koury pacific Sout, 8t Realty Paul 'Tah an .0. Sox 65176 P . O . Box Term Annex 1264 S a D�. , 06 Angelea , CA 900j5 • ,t, Las Ang CA 90091 Alta a , CA 91001 24-148--19 024�-148•-20 ��' V 024�-148/ek y � .�t..�... Frances X,. iC Pacific0t Real 02-1 Doyle z. 1123 'Tent P. O. Boerm Annex Mt .' Beach, CA 92647 Santa Mo 90403 LOS Ang 900S1, Y4 t c�� Y 1 I 1 r ".0152-01 024-152-02 024-152-03 ,clay Worthy Stanford Th Cp ��✓� Energy Dev .. Corp . Thirteenth St . 1321 Raver de P . O . Box 4049 it . Beach , CA 92648 Burbank, 91506 Bunt . Beach , CA 92605 1--152-04 024-152--05 024-1.52 -•06 in Conley �� Margaret/Rbt: . Shupe Stuart Ornohundzo r The Mast Ci r . :�33 Civic Center Ur .. west 8070 Langdon Ave . 11106 its Mesa , 92627 Santa Ana , CA 92701 Van Nuys , CA •9-2-4-0fr- 1�40 ,�,�152•� 7 4 024- lit ' ` 024--153 7 ink Cracch. alo Dc?roth'y •T@rry Ronald a � F12 Quiet Bay Ln , 8877 'Tulare Dr . B-311 123 Main Street pt , Beach, CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 t` CO -1 0024-" J �0')4-153- 11 fain re Ahmad i d'elmuti/JaC►cs Surf ,-Eldon Bagstad l Street 113 Main Streot 1901 Catalina Ave . , Beach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 926,! 1 Seal Beach , CA 90740 nc�/k A: •15.!•�12 024--153 - 17 024 -153 -18 �' r� Uc���ir"'• � k Conley Eleanor Draper Carlos Co' a Box 23 121 Main Street 16361 De 11ar Ln . { P acho San . Fe, CA 92067 Hunt , Beach , CA 92648 Hu? : , a ach , ,CA 92649 of f��� 4�-154--01. toy, ����r - 154 -02 024- 154 -- 03 a'1 Zeidan t,6,,o, I-,1- 9'arrabere/wood Margie Taylor 3S2 Patte 41"' n . 201 Fifth Street 220 Via San Remo roL. sea CA b46 Hunt: . Beach , CA 92648 �� Newport Beach , CA 92663 V I r 1 C ;7 -� 0 r ` ��r 024 -- j.54 •-05 � �.� Owe) 024 -- 159-02 d+a (•.' �•�� California Rt 'ts Inc . Hunt , Bech Co . •-?'rp • Tax Walnut Avenue 3,6000 Ve • * blvd . 111201 P . O , Box 7611 tit . Beach, CA 92648 Enc,�. no , 91436 San Francisco, CA 94120 448 1.2 024 -146--0 � pia cco l a A r t• a l o e Miller --- ate-*t+qg s 1 Strait 199 N: El Cam . Real# l4ar 14312 Willow Lane rit . $060h,0 CA 92648 Encinitas , CA 92024 Tustin, CA 92680 4-142701 024 142-02 024 -242-05 Bail,3y Marle E . Cade Harry/Bessie Fahrenkrug 2 rest A?vsriue sa-Avenue 29 Countryside Box 471 nt . bear,h , CA 92648 Midway. _City, CA 92655 1,r.eynor , 1A 51575 4--142- 06 024 -142-08 024 --142--09 bald H ,. Wood Tt: chard Bati: aclia , 7-4• Lonna Inc . 681 Quiet Hey Ln . 18872 MacArthur Blvd , P . O . Lox 4930 nk . Beach , CA 92648 First .'lour bong Beach , CA 90804 Irvine , CA 92715 t. 4-142- 1C 024 - 142-- 12 r1.9 024-142--16 ('10'`��� ,5 ' C o9ory C . Gonzales Wi l l i a'm Tat er..,o ��� r Fi t'th St . Dew 'Ltd 0. Box 2784 10062 Herrimpit Dr . Two Corp , Plaza Ste . 200 41 Beach , CA 90740 Hunt . Beach, CA 92646 Newport $ch . , CA 92660 4-142-1.7 024-142 - 18 024 -142-19 r .orge Miry Sandre, ,.'k"�:rrari 'Pony (;uenther 0. Box 1.16 706 W . Balboa Blvd . 308 Sixth Street uglas , Aft 99824 Balboa , CA 92661. Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 ' .4 - 1 ,12-20 024-142-21 024 -142-22 ,lei H . Emerson Gregory Gonzalo s William Wangler 6 Sixth Street P . O Eox 2784 �?2 E . Duarte Rd . .lit . Beach , CA 92648 Seal Beach , CA 90740 t,rcadia , CA.41644 A-1.43--01 f 024 - 1.13 -0 024 -143-044 � Y Belle Jas Ctastal De v -' GCtra�ti•lvia Shand � ,21 Doy1e Dr P . O .P . C) . Box 3576 ! 1234 Seaf t St- . µ ,nt. . each , 92647 Carmel , CA 93921. Ventura ,/'UA 93001 4-1.43-20 024--144 -01 So�"cv 024 -144 -02 ryes E. Koller Valen. i•nCFarnskiz'n et, al Everett 14. Hicks 001 Bal lenLine Tin . 312 Chicago Ave . P . O . Box 310 nt . Beach , CA 92647 Hunt . Reach , CA 92648 Hunt . Beach , CA 92648 4-144 -04 024-144-11 024 - 144 -12 it;ed States of America Leon Dubov Chilcutt/Schwartz It Office Bldg . 20222 Deer.vale Ln , 1303 Oakorove Rd . ,t . Beach , CA 92646 Hunt . Beach, CA 92646 Westlaka -Vil . ,CA . 913b2 r� � 144•-12 024 -x44-�Y4 024 -146-01 Ilen/Sebb-:i Kycc unq� : .P4 ,A � Barbara Beal t Costs Bella 17114 Moo's Rik 2100 Old Quarry Rd . Tgrb,F CA 92620 Cerritos , CA 96701. Riverside, CA 92506 -��Coa2 024-146-0"7 "' '' 1�� �, ,Olot -146 -09 tt Jerry Will ama 151anche Woad 1b4eaCt Ave. 7772 See on Drive ,:: 2(�]. Fifth6;tret�t Beach, CA 92646 bunt . 8 ch , CA 92648 Hurt . Beach , CA . 92648 i a, CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Prom FsC MABLP• MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Don MacAlliste ME&MRS and CITY CLERK Councilman r "AL OF PIAIV. AR G COMM ItSK)M taste October 16, 1989 012 i �N ON CUP $9-1. CLAP 89-1, Elk 99--4 I hey t1 the recent decision of the PWanitg commission as to CU'F 89- r am' lifif Cz As to#0 am of ttw site. Z HOt rwtrtctkmW. 3. Vefttkms as to axistft dal uses. 4. of son9stberlt of w tift recjwrements as to bootlegs that have y ONWOi dwe is r Ord for a public he4. q becaum of downsrading to two4ito y. Um t ittm Arced al. the agan& in Novembw for coonci7 action and notify the 13010 rr i {•:.'• {tar, �"�. � �gpy��'r.�r�l� �' � �i t , .1 L it f( Ir• 1 Y 1 r,'��' �, fy1rY 41 , 1• � �f r k +.� _ i .w ! n Ii+ , ' a I 1 •NA RESOLUTION NO . 1419 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO . 89-4 FOR THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMAJNT BOUNDED BY MAIN STREET , WALNUT AVENUE , FIFTH STREET AND OLIVE AVENUE 11HEREAS.. Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 and related entitlements have been prepared;, and A The City of Huntington Beach was the lead agency .zi the preparation of the Environmental impact Report ; and All persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by the planning Commission either through written Notice or during a pub?lz hearing on September 181 A.989 , and on October 3 , 1989 , such responses and comments as •padre made were dully noted and responded to. NOWp THEREF6RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission cf the City of Huntington Beach as follows SECTION 1. The punning Commission does hereby find that Nnwi,rommntal Impart deport No . 89-4 has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all Stets and local guidelines . SECTION 3 . The Planning Commission has considered all significant effects detailed in Environmental Impact F,sport No . 84-4 , ' together with existing and proposed mearures t%, mitigate such significant effects (see Exhibit A) . 88MON 3 . The Planning Commission find that thrrugh the implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures , the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the proposed project can be eliminated or reduced to a level of insignificance . SECTION 4 . The Planning Commission further finds that the benefits accruing to the City by virtue of implementing the Downtown Spociflc plan, override the unmitigatable effects det¢iled in Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 and the attached Statement of Overriding Coneiderrstions (see Exhibit a) , and the Planning copuk' mbioe of the City of Lintington Beach tides hereby adopt and ftttiiy as ndeguate Lnviro.;mental Impact Repori No. 89-4 . (37356) -13- own e ACTION 5 . Ther Flanning Di.ractor is hereoy authorized and directed to File with the Office of they County Clerk a notice of determination for Environmental Impact Reports No . 89 -,' , as required by Section 21152 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on the 3rd day of Octo!.,er, 1969 , by the following roll call vote : P`^A;S : NOES : AS'nNT: AWrA I M : ATTEST : Mike Adawis, secretary Planning Commission Chairman I 1 (36.Y2d) 43 Y i of t r' i 1'J •Vi Ado"- 4 �"" REQUEST OR CITY COUNCIL ti% TION Dete ,�_ _ November 6 , 3.989 �ehmittrclto: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members ,bmiftedyy; 1'nul Cook, City Administrator zi Pr Mike Adams , Director, Com munity •Developmen �Md by: ipat: APPUL - CONDITIONAL USE PKAMIT NO. 89.4 SMITH SPL -: PERIITS/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-1/ r' roaTaw rACT REPORT . 89--4 C= I 1rnt wM Connell P ky? I Yo I j New Policy w Exerptien $%tovwlt of heap, RwommovJetlon, Anal"*, F.jnding Source, Al wy"ve Actions, Attachnonts: r Ban � • Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Councilman MacAllister of the Planning Commirsion' s action to approve the above--roteeenced applications . °rho proposed protect: is a "master ent i t lewent" reque nt by they Redevelopment Agency to allow each property owner on the subject block to add new square footage up to I the mazim im permitted under tha Downtown Specific plan District 5 . i If each property owner elected to construct the maximum possible square footage, the total area over the entire block would be approximately 124 ,009 square feet (approximately M 7I6 square feet avow existing) . it is important tc note that participation under this entitlement in voluntary. owners may choose no participation, rehabilitation on!; with no added square footage (no entitlement action required) , or submittal of their own conditional use permit/special permit applications pertaining only to their property . UPON MrTON BY WILLIANS t Alin SECOND BY LPIPZIO, THE PLANNING COh NI88I0N, ON OCTOBER 3 , 1989 t ADOPTED i JD CERTIFIED AS ADEQUATE =YIRtI lIT1►L IMPACT REPORT NO. 89-41 8Y THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 1=St W1111ams, Leipsig, Shomaker, 8ourquignon, Mountford ,Hogs: Ortega .AST: Kirkland ANSTAIN: dons j M NOTION AY WILLIAMS AND SECOND IST LEIPZ IQ, THE FLAMING -COMUICA0, ON OCTOMM 8, 1999; APPROUD COASTAL DZV=PWM PSRKIT '00,o 89-1 MM COMIT101M U92 VZRKIT 100. 89-1 WITH SPLCIAL PERMITS, flAMIEW AND CONDITI0115 OF APPROVAL AS OUTLINED IN ATTACMUNT I U2PJM, 8Y THE FOLLMING VWS 1 1 r. i Y, 01N AYESs Williams, Leipzig , Shomaker , Zourguignon, Ortega, Mountford MOSS: Bone "Sim: Kirkland ABSTAIN: done Staff eacgMndation: Rtaff concurs with the planning Connis2ion recommendation as outlined above. ,1, GA-A,: City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Councilman MacAllister 8. troinat DoluiRtion Conditional One Permit No. 89-1 with Special 'ftrmits and Coastal Development Permit No , 89-1 constitute a request to allow up to 70# 726 square feet of additional mixed use development on one City black bounded bar Main Street, Walnut Avenuee Fifth Street and Clive Avenue. There are currently approximately 53 , 282 squarer feet of davalolment on the block. Now square footage may occur on an omer�*b►y--vwner basis by either 1) facade improvement of OxiSting lmildi.ngs In conjunction with now additions up to the maximum square foot"* poxaittod under the Downtown Specific Plan; or 2) demolition of existing structures and of new buildings . This Conditional use pereoit and coastal development permit are � intended to serge as the mastor entitlements for now square footage on the block. Racb property owner may choosey facade rehabilitation asly (no a ati:tle ngAt sriquiree d) , submittal of their own Conditional Use Permit applicationo or no action. r a, Although a eat inCreaase of 70, 726 square feet is possible if all oarners on the block develop to the maxiantrtr extent feasible, this scenario is unlikely. Several building owners have been approved for rehabilitation with no added square footage. These includes the $bank Houma (202 Fifth) t the Burt Museum (611 Olive), The Bread Cruab (215 Main), Bugaer Shack/Happy Doze Togert (213 Main) , and Harbor slues/Hair Nolan (209 Main) . Assuming the owners of these propettlees do not add square footage rnrsuant to this entitlement, the potential additional square footage over the remainder of the block would bo approximately, 51, 161 square feast. In addition, some pro fart ow wre have indicated to the Redevelopment Agency that they wil not be participating6 p' to apgtion Wlil addreaSs the Ignuos as Seat forth in Councilman 1 CAILA If'8 806el letter, dated October 16, 1989 (see tachmen- .r . a . Area of the Site/Setbacks Councilman MacAllister is concerned that the Planning Commission 9-ranted special permit requests for a zero foot build-to ling on Wain Street in lieu of a five foot build-to liner, and a zero foot building setback on Walnut Avenue in lieu of a five foot building setback, while Granting no special permit for front building setback ilong Fifth Street . However , no such special permit was requested along Fifth Street by the Agency at the time of application. Therefore, the Planning Commission did not consider such a request . Modification of the 5th Street setback can be processed if t}los6 affected property owners desire that Change. x . Huil4ing Height Restrictions The Planning Comwission imposed a condition of +approval on Conditional Use Permit No . 89•-1 that, "Construction on the project site shall not excoed two stoicies oh• 30 feet in height . " The Downtown Specific Plan District 5, Sectio4 4 . 7, 04 , allows building heights up to 3 stogies for developments on less than a full block . It should be noted that the Flanning Commission ' s restriction to twc � stories applies p1ly to property owners who participate under this entitlement . Owners who do not choose to act, under Conditional Use Permit No. 89-1 are not affected, nor are owners who may seek future approvals of their own Conditional Use Permits for abded square � footage. The code section allowing 3-story development has not Changed. 3 . Existing Ueeo/Qrandfathering of Parking Requirements . The Nedevelopmant Agency will he responsible for "crediting" parking spaces for existing legal square footage and legal uses that exist at the time of approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Coastal ilevelopment Permit, pursuant to the City Council approved Facade Grant Program. individual property owners will be responsible for parking deaeand generated by additional square footage. The following conditions of approval imposed by the Planning Cormnission address this concern: old. The City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency shall be responsible for parki, g spaces reequiresd for existing square footage. The number of spaces for which the Agency will be responsible shall be based on existing legally constructed square footage, to be verified prier to issuance of building permits. 4h* property owners shall provide on-site parking or pay in-lieu fees for additional square footage in accordance with the approver, facade grant program. Provision for payment of fees =at be safe prior to issuance of' building permits, in accordance with the program. to Vass�onee to the planning Commission' s and Counei loran 1ie�r.Allister' s concerns, the 2646velopment Agency ha: . hired Thirtieth gtr*et Architects to determine the amount of square footage that will be countod for the purpose of grandfathering the eaieting t .. number of rMpired parking spaces. The chart below shows the number t of parking spaces required far roperty owners who have inlicated that they will be or may be add�ng aquar6 f^otage . parking requirements are based on gross squares footago of the building ( includes hatharoamc , hall*&ys, storage area , e�c . ) and the primary use of the structure . V'ao7ent buildings in this zoning district ixa:e sisumed to be parked at ganeval retail ratios . SQUARS PARK I pG NO. OF ADGrXSB U8$ Too".NOR RATIOS SPACES 202 Main Restaurant 1,539. 3 sq . ft . 1/100 10 203 Main Retail 2, 637 sq. ft . 1/200 14 205 Stain CUP 89-1/CDP 89--1 are not applicabld - approved for rehabilitation only 207 Main Retell 4, ;. 66 aq . ft . 1/200 25 � 209 !fain Restaurant 2, 234 sq . f k . 1/100 23 211 Main Vacant 2, 615 eq. ft . 1/200 14 E 213 )Wain CUP 89-1/CDP 89-1 are not applicable - approved for rehabilitation only ' 215 Main CUP 89-1.eCDP 09-1 are not applic8 `ale - approved for rohabi l i t a.t ion only 217 main CUP 89-1/CDP 89-1 are• not applicable - owner has indicated to Redevelopment Agency that he will not be " participating 2:21 Katz 'Vacant 1, 444 sq. ft. 1/200 16 223 Kaih Vacant 3, 142 eq. ft. 1/200 16 411 Olive CVYP 89-1/CDP 89-1 are not applicable - approved for rehabiiitation only 222 fifth CUP 09-1/CDP 89-1 are not applicable - owner has � indicated to the Redevelopment Agency that he will not be particleatinq 21S/220 Fleth Retail 2,549 *5 sq. ft. 1/200 12 210 V ttb OP 09-1rCDP 89-1 are not applicable - mmer has indicated to Redevelopsrnt Aqency that he will not be Participating ,r �.d_ (3939d) 1 , r 1 S L:Alt15 PARKING No. of ADDUSS Ul;' 001 AVE RATIO SPACES 204n Fifth CVP 89-1/CDP 89-1 are not applicable -- approved for rehabilitation only 412 Walnat kastp-Irant 4 , 66C sq. f t . 1/100 47 t The Planning Commission, on October 8, 1989 , certified Environmental °? Impact Report 89-4 am adequate, anO adoyted Resolution No. 1419 with Mitigation Measures and Staterent of Overriding Consideration (Atteeboe ,t Xo . 3) . Staff concurn with this action and recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution (Attachment No. 4 ) , certifying Environmental Impact Report No ,. 89-4 as adequate. Fur further discussion of Environmental lnp6vt Report issues, please refer to Planning Commission staff reports dated September 19 , 1989 , 'i and October 3 , 12989, (Attachments 5 and 6) . Ro': applicable . a The City Council may: A. Find Environmental Impact Report Do . a9-4 to be adequate and approve Conditional Use Permit No . 89-4. Stith Special Permits and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-3, with findings and amended Conditions to allow 3 story construction and 0 foot retback on 5th at-.set 3n Hou of 5 feet . B. Find Ravironmental Impact Reports No. 09-4 to be adequate and deny Conditional Use Permit no. 89-1 with Special Permits and Coastal Development PerAi.t No. 89-1 with findings . Is Planning Comission Findings and Conditions of Approval 2," Apppeal Letter dated October U, 1989 S, planning e.*. d mir.sion ReLolution No. 2419 4. City council Regolut:.on go. � S. Plafining COM188102 Staff Report dated September 19, 1989 (with Attach X ats) s. Property turner List b. Area map 0. site plan d. 219 No. 59-4 (available for review in the Planning Department) S. Response to Camarents on EYR no. 89 t. Orsft Resolution adapting Sift No. 99-4 -5. (8989d) 1 r a r' r 4 1 q. ZAbihi.t A - intigation measures h. Exhibit a - Statmont of overrid ng Consi6erations i . Zzhibit C - Findings (SIR No . 69-4 ) j . Er rasa Shout SIR Flo. 814-4 6 . Flanning Cor.v---ts&iora staff Report dated October 3, 1989 (with '�; 1�ti c a4�hr�:its as Ree'pouse tip Comwnts ( revised) b. Draft Resolution adopting RIR No. 89•4 p o. axhibit A - kitigation Keasuros ( reviaed) d, fthlbit a - .atutweeent of overriJing Conarderations (rt:vimed) as Exhibft C Findings for EIR No. 89-4 (revived) 7, Approved facade grant grogram. s:. f+ �Y f' p=1; I r, Y r, it 1 I: I * 1 y d"I 44Y r b rfN AIN &P.TTACHMM 1 PLANNING COMMISU104 FINDINGS Air CONDITIONS 0";° APPROVAL yam_ T •` / I. The granting of Conditional Use Wers:it po . 89-1 for up to 70v725 Square feet of mired use development will Implement the 3cnera 1 Plan of the City of Huntington Basch, the Downtowvr. Specific :?lac, and the Downtown Deeigr. Cuidelines . 2 . The location, site layout , and design of the structurne on tb6 rehabilitation block will properly adept .them to streets, driveways, and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner, because final dcxign of each renovst�d or zeconstruated building will be swwhi ect ues i gn Review Board approval, 3 . The = ,ors to and parking for the propceed reh&bilitationlnew const :�!CztiOA dogs Llot create an undue parking yroblem, because mitigation mossures will be implemented requiring pAyment of in-lieu fees and conatruction of oft-site %paces . 1 . The fc ' Loviing special permits promote a better living environment by adapting the Downtown Specif�,c Plan vequireiv*nts to Latter suit individual development of ccmwrci.sl and office buildings on the block, which are compeciblo with the surrovuding area: a, zeto Boot setback on Walnut Avenue in lieu of t feet ; be zero foot build-to--line on Main street it, lieu of 5 fnetr Bad o. Structures up to 30 feet in height within 25 feet of the Main . Bt:roet right-of--ray in lieu of a maximum of 25 feet, in height . 2 . The regweste d special pmrmits provide for naxinnus use of ses,hetically pleexning types of architecture, des-:.gn and building 1&7out. 26 fte requested Npevi al Vomits will not be detrlmentsl to the general health& welfareo safety eAd cutavenieeee, nor detrimental or injurious to the values of property or improv=ents of the n9igbboshood or of the City in general.. WA 111/6/49 -7- 1�93gd) �F PONNEW ... y:� i a + 01 4 , Tho r.equenterd spec.i a l ;ei,x-ml, t. s are cona#.st:ent with the oo; ect:i vQs of tho Dowut own gpecifi(:: Plirvi st;andarda in achinying a development adapted to too surroune4nq built environment err , compatible with pr,apr.;sed. dovelopme nt in .ho area . 1 . The prnposvl 70, 726 square foot nixad- use development conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington tieach, Coastal Element of the Gentral Plan. 2 . CoaaLai DevelopmeaL Njzr ll; No , 89-1 iz� curic:iat+etatt with Uie CZ (Coastal zone) suffix* the Downtown Specific Plan, and prnviai.ons of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the r roperty. 3 . At the time of oczr:upancy, the proposed ?0 , 726 square foot inizesd-une development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Element and Coastal Land Dse Plan Of the Genc4ral Plan. 4 . The proposed 70 , 726 square foot mixed-use development coaxforms with the public access and public recroation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . 1 . The site plan, flour plans , and elevations for each proposed addition, alteration, or new building shall be uW)Ject to the standards of the Downtown Specific Plan, the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and they Special permits herein, and shall be Pubject to approval by the Design Review Board . *x . Prior to the issuance of any demolition permits an adequate monitoring and/cir bonding prograim shall be established between the City Redevelopment Agency and property owners to ensure that demolition and construction vibration impacts do n,)t adversely affect off-site structures . 3 . Prior to submittal for building perlaits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following: +a . Floor plena shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical stubbed {.n at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking faciliti.es # woteer heaters, and central heating units; and lop-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. b. if foil-type insulation is to be used: a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building D*part>jneent and indicated on the floor plane . C. P'le nations shall depict colors and' building materials proposed. a Mitigation Measures C C,, Lot d . All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screenea from view of public rights-of-way , Sa- d screening ahal,l be architecturally comnpati;alu with the building in terms of materiaslz and colors . it screening is not designed spec Afi.cally into the building , A rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitteJ showing screening and must be approved . e . Prior to tho innua ace of Building Permits , a detailed ' lighting plan shall be apprn-und by the Department of Community Development . The plan shall be consistent with the Downtown lighting plan aild lighting standards in the Downtown Design Guidelines . * f . Where determined necessary by the Departments of Building and Public Works, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a regiastea ed Soils Engineer . This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of muter. ials to provide detailed recommnendations regarding grading, chemical and fill p4oparties , foundations , retaining wells, streets , and utilities . Depending on the results of aasoiln Atudies conducted for new construction mitigating measures will be required to be incorporated into the project. These measures may include but not limited toe buffar , special grading , special foundations , subdraains , dewatering devices, and retaining walls . g. The Design Review hoard shall review the site plans, floor plans and elevations , including proposed colors and materials . The design shall incorporate elements of the Downtown Design Guidelines, aeud elements of historic Huntington Beach structures. h. The site plan (or reference pagte) shall include all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. a . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant/owner stall complete tha followings * aa, Comprehensive documentation of the project site, as it currently exists , shall ba prepared prior to the issuance of any building, grading, and/or demolition pexmit:ss . The locum utatfon shall be in accordance with standards established by the Historical Am rican Buildings Survey/Historical Amrican Engineering Records (KAMS HAR) . The report shall be archivally maintained with provisions for public access . The costs associated with preparation and maintenance of the documentation shall be the responsibility of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. Os. miser to th• approval or issumnee of any demolition, graadiaq, *aad/or building peraa>nita, all facets of the project related to histeriC prol*rvation shall be reviewed and aap►prowod by the City of Huntington ftach . ► �ii�i��an liebsnrasa� 1 r r r,a • ,rl r t yld.lr N'rl \r, 1 Apr 1 c . Where determined necessary by the Uppartmeant cf Public marks , a grading plan shall be submitted to tt;b Department of Public 'forks for review and it must be approved (by issuance o+7 at grading permit) . A plan f'c-. silt control for all wafer runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if dEeened necessary by the Director of Public Works . d. The City of Huntington Busch Redevelopment Agency shall be responsible for parking spaces rcquired for existing square footage . The number of spaces for which the Agency will be responai.ble shall be based on ezwsting ldgally constructed squares footage, to be verified prior to issuance of j building permits . e. All applicable public Works fees small be paid . f. Whare required by the Huntington Beach ordinance Codes or the State Subdivision Map Act , a parcel may consolidating parcels or portions of parcels shall ae submitted. Said asap ahall be recorded prior to final inspection and a copy submitted to the Depar4meeAt of Community Devslopm6nt . g. An interim parking and/or building materials ato rage play shall be submitted to the Department of Community Devealopmant to &&sure adequate parking is aver:lablee for employees, customers, contractors, ate . , during any structure' s construction phase. a h. PropeaLty owners shall provide on-site parking or pay in-lien fees for additional square footage in accordance with the approved facado grant program, Provision for payment of fees must be made prior to issuances of buildir.-I permits, in accordance with the program. i . The Precise plan of Street .Alignment for Walnut Avenue I between Main and Sixth Streets shall be resolved and adopted by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits for tow construction on tho •lots adjoining Walnut Avenue (201 Maine Street , 412 Walnut Ave3nue, 202 Fifth Street) . 05 . A rign and landscape plats shall be submitted to the Design HevLow Board andr'or City -V .anning Department by each property owner prior to approval of sign permits . The location and type of all signs shall conform to they provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinances Code and be consistent with the standards listed on pagi 33 of the Downtown Iles{gn CuidesllneR. All lighting and landscaping materials shall also be consistent with the guidelines. s'6. The City shill encourages and/or sponsor a planned sign program can both sides of Min Stweeest. TAis program shall include poosible sign m ortisation, City funded re �,al of existing signa, and Clay funded purchases and mounting of new signs . Nitilistion Mrasuros A 11✓6/69 �10- (3939d) r. ,r *7 . The City shall implement consistency of similar landar:ape and l aindsscaps on both olden of Main Street: . 68 . An projects within the parking district , comprised of I)owntown Specific Flan Districts 3 and 5ar request development approval they shall contribute their: "fair-share" towards reducing the cumviat-i.ve parking demand deficiency. fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits or certificate of occupancy, whi%hever comes first . The off-site parking spaces shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new development . 9 . The applicant ahall meet all applinable local, State and Federal Fire Codes , Ordinanc:ess , and standards . 10. The development shall comply with a' l applicable Provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Firo Department . 11. All building spoila , such as unusable lumber , wire . pipe, and other surplus o,~ unusable material, shall be disposed of, at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 12 , Construction skull be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall, be pxohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. 13 , Construction on the project site shall not exceed t:wc; stories or 30 feet in height . 14 . This conditional use permit shall become null and vo�.d unless exercised within one (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a writtan request submitted tc the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. a liitivation magnates WA 11/6/69 -li- 0939d) n . / y.lo a 4 huntington beach depnrtmer5t of community development 3111Af PORT TO: planning Conuni ,eion FROM: Ccumcnu-nity Development DATE: Gctober. 3 , 1989 SUBaECT : CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-1 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS , COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO . 8 9••-1 , EAV IaONMENThL IMPACT REPORT NO . 89-4 (CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER :1.9 , 1989 PLANNING C=A.ISSIGN MEETING) AgPLICM: City of :Iuntington Beach ATE, ACCEPTEQ: f Redevelopment. Agency January 5 , 1989 f PROPERTY Various ( see attached MA,NDAIQRY EHOCESSINQ DATE : : list) January 5 , 1990 REQUEST : To permit up to 70, 726 Z . Dowixtowci Specific sq . ft . of mixed use develop- Plan District 5 (Mixed ment on one City block, Uso -- Commerci-xl/Gffice/ in accordance with the Residential) the Downtown Specific flan . The proposed special UENERAL PIAN: Mixed Use permits are to allow : Office/Residential) 1) 0 ft . setback on Walnut Ave . in lieu of 5 ft . ; E::1STjNC USE: Various - 2) 0 ft . build-towline on Retail , Office, Residential Main St . in lieu of 5 ft . ; and 3) structures up to u= N,: City block bounded 30 ft . in height within by mHain Street , Walnut 25 f t , of the Main street Avenue, Fifth Street and right-of-way in lieu of a Olive Avenue. maximum of 25 ft , in height . ,AtE,: Approximately 3 acres total A. Adopt and certify an adequate Environmental Impact Report No . I 89--4 by adopting planning Connlssion Resolution No . 1419 (with Statement of Overriding Considerations) ; M. Approve Coastal Development permit No. 89-1 with findings ; and O. Approve Conditional Use Permit No . 69-1 %with Special Permits with findings and conditions of approval . i , �•� This itdAl was Continued from the September 19 , 1909 , planning Commission meeting to allow staff to clarify several issuers raised ty Comcr.issioners , A. ewi Qescriut ion,: Currently, there are 53, 282 square feet of develcpment on the block. The project is a request to 8dd up to 70 , 726 additional square feet . The conditional use permit waitld allow each property owner to request development on his individual lot, up to the maximum square fcot-age permitted by the Downtown Specific plan District 5 . Added together , the maximum build out of all properties on the block is 124fOOG square feet, or a net incrsase of 70, 726 square feet over the existing 4evelopment . Provided each property owner ' s development proposal met the standards of the Downtown Specific Plan and am spacial permits granted pursuant to this application, Use Design Review Hoard would approve tt,e final site plans, flour plans and elevations . i Although a not increase of 70, 726 square feet is possible if all owners on the block develop to the maximum extant feasible, this scenario is unlikely because several building owners have been, tpproved for rehabilitation of existing buildings only, tiitl no addea square f00tago. These include the thank House (202 Fifth) , the Surf HUBS= (411. Olive) , The Bre3d Crumb (215 Main) , Sugar Shack/Happy Dome Yogert (213 Main) , and Harbor W ue/Hair Salon (205 Mai: ) . Annuming the owners of these properties dry not add square footage pursuant to this entitlement, the potential additional, sgjirre footage over the remainder of the .black would be approximately 51 , 151 square feet . B. Cgongmig Feasibility CEQA sloes nog: require that economic or social impacts of a project be discussed in the E1R . Economic impacts may be discussed if they are part of a chain of cause and, affect from a proposed project to the physical changes caused by an economic or social change. CEQA mandates that "the focus of the analysis shall be on the physical changes"' (Section 15131 . ) In this case, it: is not necessary to trace ercanomic changes in order to determine impacts. It is clearly stated in the SYR that any alternative that removes a historic structure is eAvironmentally significant . Degrees of significance beyond the threshhold level are irrelevant . 1 provideo that economic feasibility may be a factor when the Decision maker approves a project that has significant envirnnment:al impact An rejects mitigation measures or project alternatives based On economic infeasibility of those measures or alternatives . 6aQuic analysis is not necessary, however, when social or other footers are the overriding considerations in determining that they benofits of the project outweight its adverse impacts or the benefits > bs!! 1eport - 10/3/69 -Z- (3732d) f 0 __TI, of alternative proposals . The benef. it3 accruing to th., City from the proposed project include Enhancement of main Street: as"a pedestrian link betwec.n upper Main Street and the pier_ , improved aesthetics in the coastal zone , effective blending of historic and medit:erranean architectural stylus , and rational land planning for retail and of f les use as spec i. f i a-d in the Downtown Specific" pecrifis Plan . Thnse benefit's are not exclusivoly econornir. in nature . C. Parkirtc5c�. ,e na r Spat uQ The proposed conditional use perinit and coastal developmE.rit permit would allow each prr perty owner to add square footage ovier and above their existing square footage , up to the. maximum allowed by the Downtown Specific Flan . Each property owner will be responsible for parking the added square footage either on-site or thr.niagh payment of in-lieu Fees established by the City Council . The Redevelopment Agency has obligated itself through the approved Facade Grant Program to provide parking for the existing square footage and any additional square footago accommodated through in-lieu fees . The determination of existing square footage to be grandfathered will need to he verified by the Aiency prior to issuance of building petmi'�s . The figures used in the ETRwere based on approximate outside dimenEions of the buildings . Any discrepancies in actual use of the building will not materially affect the conclusions of the EIR. Whether square footage is fitatermined to be "existing" or "additional " af.f_ icts only the decision of who will pay for parking spaces : the property owner or the Agency. The Planning Commission need not determine this division, but should only assure that provisions are made to accommodate all parking required at maximum buil.dout . This is accomplished by implementation of the following conditions (Revis,id Mitigation Measure wo . g and Devised Mitigation Measure No . 10) . g. The City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency shall be responsible for parking spaces required for existing square footage. The number of spaces for which the Agency will be responsible shall be based on existing legally constructed square footage, to be verified prier to issuance of building permits . 10. Property owners shall provide parking or pay in-lieu tees for additional square footage in accordance with the approved facada grant program. provision for payment of fees must be made prier to issuance of building permits , in accordance with the program. It should be noted that all parking in the downtown core area is based on joint use of facilities . The City/Agency will be providin-j addi.tibnal parking for thc: downtown area through the 200 Block Structure, the North of the Pier Structure, and a potential 300 Block Structure. Should a shortfall occur before these .facilitieu are completed, approximately 100 on--street parking spaces are available along Main CtreF : which have not been figured into the total supply . Itaff Report - 10/3/89 -3- (3732d) W 1 S M ' ID. �ltrert�aiYB .-#'or P� .1 .t The EIR did not consider an alternative site for Condition& l Use Permit No . 89-1 and Coastal Development Permit No . 89-1 be3cauEa the entitlements are a direct result of a previously approved Facade Grant Program on this block. The conditional use permit and coastal development permit are the means to implement an option available under the program. The, decision maker (Planting Commission) does not have the discretion to relocate the Facade Grant Prograia to another block. The EXR dial not discuss project generated traffic because it was Identified in the initial Study as previously addressed in FIR 82-3 . The pravious EIR discussed a more. intense buildout of the Downtown area than is currently proposed. The traffic impacts assesses] in Elk 82--2 were judged to be significant adverse impacts . The City Council that adopted the original Downtown specific Plan made a Statement of Overriding Considerations , stating that the benefits of the Plan outweighed the adve:.se trai: -Iic impacts , Since the impacts of Conditional Use Formic No . 89-1 and Coastal Development Permit No. 89-1 are l.e,ar than thong previously assessed, the impacts are covered by they previous Statement of Overriding Considerations . Please refer to Appendix A in th EIR - Initial Study . The City Council adopted Circulation Element Amendment No . 84-1. on June 4 , 1984 , setablishing the general alignment of Walnut Avenue between Laka and 6t;h Streets. Precise: Plan of St%eset'. Alignment No +86-1, establishing the precise alignment of Walnut Avenue, was adopted October 17 , 1986 . The alignment reflected an 80 foot ultimate right-of- way, which was upheld by the planning Commission on January 18, 1989 in their action on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No. 88-3 . Precise Plan of Street Alignmen•'06- No . 89-3 to reduce the right-of-way width on Walnut between Main and 6th Streets will be presented to the Commission pz: or to this item on October 3, 1989 . The Commission' s action on Precise Plan of Street Alignment No . 89-3 does not affect the request as set forth in this conditional use permit and coastal development permit , namely, to allows each property owner to add square footage pursuant to tho Downtown Specific Plan. If the precise plan of street alignment is denied , thus retaining an 80 foot right-ef-way, the property owners facing Walnut Avenue would need to dedicate an additional 10 feet for street purposes upon redevelopment or addition to the structure. All development Including specisl permit requests, would be within the new property lines . Therefore, the conditional use permit may be implemented whether the right-of-way is 80 feet or 60 foot . Since dedication of 10 feet on these lots would them unbuildable, it is likely that the buildings would be limited to rehabilitation only. Alternatively. , the owners o.1 those lots could consolidates or joint; venture with Owners to the north to attain buildable area. Staff proposes that the followLng condition be added to the conditioral uee permit : 16thft X*j*rt - 10/8/89 �4- (373243) ode ti , r �. �. . The Precis& plan of Street Alignment for Walnut Avenue betwisen Main and Sixth Streets shall lie reso l!ved aria adopted by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits for new 10 +)n$tzuction on the lets adjoining lalnut Avenue (201 Main Street , 412 K&lnut Avenue; 202 Fifth Street ) . Staff recommends that the Planning Commission,. A. Adapt and carLify as adequate Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 by adopting Planning Coiwnissinn t esolut'ion N -, . 1419 (with Stat— ant of Overriding Considerations) ; S. Approve, Coastal Development Pearnit No. 89-1 with the following findings; and C. Approve Conditional Use permit No . 89--1 with Special Permits with the following findings and conditionn of approval . FIMIN43S FQB.. P�� ..--... IISYd__.RFHMIT NO ,�_12-1: 1 . The granting of Conditional Use Permit No . 89-1 for up to 70 , 726 square feet of mixed use development will imp lement he ri� P p t ve �ral rtan of Lae City of. Huntington Beach, the Downtown Specific Plan, and the Downtown Design Guidelines , 2 . The location, rite layout , and design of the structures an the rehabilitation block will properly adapt thorn to streets , driveways , and other adjacent structures and uses in a herfr,onious manner, because final 3esign of each rennovated or reconstructed building will be subject to De qn Review Board approval . 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed reha3abilltati.on/new construction does not create an undue parking problem, because mitigation measures will be implemented requiring payment of in-lieu fees and construction of off-site spaces . FFZIM-1- ( s FOR APPINVAa.L — . C_A ITS S 1. The following special permits promote a better living environment by adapting the Downtown Specific Man requirements to better suit individual development of commercial and office buildings on the block, which are compatible with the surrounding area: a. Zero foot oaf-back on Walnut Avenue in lieu of 5 feet; h. Zero foot build--to-line on Main Street in lieu of 5 feet ; and C. Structures up to 30 feet in height within 25 feet of the Main Street right-of-way in lieu of a maximum of 25 feet in height. T ""Nor 2 . The raq+iested special permits provide For maximum use of aesthetically, pleanin4 types of architecture, design and building layout . 3 . The requested special permits will not be detrimental to the general health , welfare, s : fety and convenience, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood or of the City in general . d . The requested special permits are consistent with the objectives of the Downtown Specific Plar standards in achieving a development adapted t:o 'Che: surrounding built erivi. r. onment and compatible with proposed development in the area . .f INn ZNC. APFRQ3CAL, - CC S.TAL DEVELQJZEN' pERMx' NO 1 . The proposed 70 , 726 square foot mixed -use development conforms j with the plans , policies , r -.tquireme nts and standards of the Huntington Hsach Coastal Element of the General Plan . 2 . Coestsl Development Kermit No . 89--1 is consistent with the CZ (Coastal Zane) suffix, the Downtown Specific Plan , and provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. 3 . At the time of occupancy, the proposed 70, 726 square foot mixed-use development can be provided with infrastructure in a � manner that is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Element and Coastal Land Use Plan of the General Plan. 4 . The proposed 70, 726 square foot mixed-use development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . NDITIONI, QE A ' OY : 1 . The site plan, floor plans, and elevations for each proposed addition, alteration, or new building shall be subject to the standards of the Downtown Specific Plan, the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and the !Special permits herein, and shell be subject to approval by the Design Review Board . *2. Prior to the issuance of any demolition permits an adequate monitoring end/or bonding program shall be established between the City Redevelopment Agency and property owners to ensure that demolition and construction vibration impacts do not adversely affect offsite structures . 3 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the folluwincl : Invironmental Mitigation Measure SW Report - 10/3/89 (3732d) d ' 1 - ",''' i�.W a . rloor plans shall depict natura3, gas and 220V electrical stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers ; natural gas shall be atubbed in at the lucations of cooking far:f li t;hes , water heaters , and central heating units ; and low.-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets , b , if foil .-type :.nsul.ation is to he used , a fire retardant type shall be install.p.d as approved by the Building Department an,] 1.ndicated on the floor plans . c . Eiuvationz shall depict culors and building material:: proposed . d . All rooftop mechanical equipment shall. be screened from view of public rights-of-way. Said screening shah be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into the building , a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved . to . Prior to the issuance of Building Permits , a detailed lighting plan shall be approved by the Department of Community Development . The plan shall bs consistent with the Downtown lighting plan and lighting standards in the Downtown Design Guidelines . Of . Where determined necessary by the Dapartments of Building and Public Works , a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer . This analysis shell include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fill properties , foundations, retaining walls , streets, and utilities . Depending on the results of soils studies conducted for new construction mitigating measures will be required to be incorporated into the project . These measures may include but not limited to : buffer, special grading , special foundations , subdrains , dewatering devices , and retaining walls . g , The Design Review Board shall review the site plans, floor clans and elevations* including proposed colors and muterfaa - . The Design shall incorporate elements of the Downtown Design Guidelines , and elements of historic Huntington Beach structures . h . The site plan (or reference page) shall include all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 4 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : ftr/ironmental ltifAgation Measure �toft * rt 10/3/89 � 7- (3732d) *I. y ':'m, dal► Comprehansiva documentation of the project site, as it currently existo , shall be prepared prior to the issuance of any building, grading , and/o� demolition permits ; The documentation shall be in accordan�;e with standards established by the Historical American Buildings Survey/Historical. American Engineering Records (HASS/HAER) . Th.,j report shall be archivaliy maintained with provisions ::or public access . The costs associated with preparation and maintenance of the documentation shall be the responsibility of t!,e Huntington Beach Pedevelopment Agency , Ab. Prior to the approval, or issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building permits , all facets of the project related to historic preservation shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Huntingtr.n Beach . C. Where deterlined necessary by the Department of Public Works , a grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for reviews and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A pXan for silt control fer all water runoff froi,i the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the bisector of Public Worka . REVISED *d . The City of bunt*ngton Beach Redevelopment Agency shall the rep-ionsible it parking spaces required for existing square foutege. The number of spaces for which the Agency will be responsible shall be based on existing legally constructed square footage, to be verified prior to Issuance of building permits . e . All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid . f , Where required by the Huntington Breach Ordinance Code or the State Subdivision Map Act , a parcel map consolidating parcels or portions of pazcels shall be saibmit .ed. Said map shall be recorded prior to final inspection and a copy submitted to the Department of Community Development . q. An interim parking and/or building materials storage plan shall be submitted to tle Department of Community Development tv assure adequate parking is available for employees , customers , contractors, etc . , during any structure ' s construction phase. RBVTSZD sh, Property owners shall provide on-site parking or pay in-lieu fees for additional sghaaseR footage in accordance with the approved facade grant program N Provision for parwnt of fees must be mada prior to issuance of building permits, in accordance with the program, * Raviropinental Mitigation measure • UI°f t't a 10/3/87 wear (3732d) LsL,r "1 r 1i. � . r ll r Yr. YJ rK i r ADD i . The Precise Plan of Street Alignment for. Walnut Avenue between Main and Sixth Streets cha].1 be resolved and adopted by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits for nee construction on the lots ,• dJoining Walnut Avenue (201 Main Street;, 412 Walnut Aveii%�c, 202 Fifth Street) . A sign and land5cape plan shall be submitted to the )assign Review Board and/or. City Planning Department by each property owneF prior to approval of siren permit,: . The 1ocAtion and type of all signs shall conform to the provisions of the Huntington beach ordinance Coda and be consistent with the standards listad on page 33 of the Downtown Design Cuidulines . All lighting and landscaping materials shall also be con-,intent with the guidelines . "6 . The City shall encourage and/or sponsor a planned sign program on both Bides of Main Street . This program Shall include possible sign amortization, City funded removal of existing signs , and City funded purchase and mounting of now signs . 07. The City shall implement consistoncy of similar landscape and landscape on 1_,oth sides of Main Street . 8. As projects within the parking district, comprised of Downtown Specific Flan .Districts 3 and Sa , request development approval , they grail contribute their "fair-share" towards reducing the cumulative parking demand deficiency. fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits or certificate of occupancy, whichever comes first . The offsite parking spaces shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new development . 9 . The applicant shall meet all applicable local , State and Federal Fire Codes , Ordinances , and standards . 10 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Buildirg Division, and Fire Department . 11 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wins, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility egtei,ppe►d to handle them, 12 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibiter) Sundays and. Federal holidays . 1 : . This conditional use permit shall become null and void unless exercised within ore (1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 62aviroMental Mitigation Measure sk4ff Itepost 10/8/89 -9- (3733d) .w. ti 1 1 I • 1 'bm Planning Commissiori may .. (A) Find EIR No . 89--4 to be ir.adequat'C.: undo:: the pr,)vi;:;ions of CEQA ,and deny Cunditional Use )rermit: Ne.) . 89-1 with SpOcial. Permits and Csaetal Devalorm.-ant Permit No . 69-1 with findings; or (P) Find EIR jo . 89-4 to be adequate and deny Conditional UjSQ Permit No . 89•-1 with Special Permi.trs and Coastal Development Permit Nq . 89-1 with 1 . Response to C01:-narits 'Revised) 2 . Draft Renoluti,on adopting EIR No . 89-4 3 . Fxhibit .A -- Mitigation Measures (Revived) 4 . Exhibit R Sta►teraent cf Gver ciftiig Considerat.- ons (Revised) 5 . Exhibit; C - leindings for FUR No . 89-4 (Revised) W54 LP:j r I port - 10,l9/09 -10- (37Zt) ,,., h,��, • r ,off„ tl'�'Iwet, d � 9b x � um f ► ;',.� 4,', W' Nis (ADDITIONS/CORRECTIONS IN HOLD PRINT) ;1. LANOW I N (DML) I Comma to our phone conversation of August 31 , 19e9 , I am ' ri ( comments and corrections to Environnental Impact Report - 2e0 $!i-4 . As a property owner in the subject area , as well as of the Huntington Beach Historic Resources Board, I Was r , ' Noire to preview EIR No . 89r-4 with the Board due to this obvious ' ,4#34glict of interest . Accordingly, I am .re£ore subrnitt ino my own e sr &nd Comments on SIR No . 89-4 as an involved property owner. . Response Ai '+ , rit is not and included in the final record of the project . r. MM 2 Cow any: .A V r�hlar this heading, two options ara given . Both require pertici� ation in a City-sponsored progr. aM with specific land dedicaJons and C.C. & R , s . which are reguiied to run with the land (added to the Dead) , Missing from this section is a t;lird option which would allow property owners to participate withotit, making any land dedications or signing C .C. & R . s . by not acrci? ting any grant moneyso alternatively financing the wor- - themselves , [ ► 2 Response The protect (CUP No . 89-1 and CDP 89-1 ) for which the ETR was prepared addresses addition to or crolistruction of buildings on the h$,ock pursuant to the Facade Grant program adopted by City CounCi. l . parti.Cil4atic• i in the prograir, by property owners is voluntary. Property owne'ra may Choose to Obtain a1tc.:native financing, however F .phis would not ele�mpt them from compliance w th standard C_ 't9gulations and policies (such as t9ed itat4 on of Iande where l icable) . 3 . coarse:�t on page 35 state$ : �s,t�,p property owners can rehabilitate the facades of their , ; t roj without entitlement from the city as long as they are rant square footage. " 16 ,. M' J 4, ti r = gileation ;:hG Validity of this statement . I gave oweted 217 Mein $trq.et for over ten bears . During this tirne, i have been unable to got a permit to build a fence around my empty back lot , even though high rates of vandalism were present in the area . If the city staff won't let me protect the teax of m7 building, what chance do I or sn'yone also have of getting a permit to do Apdy_ work without granting the city land dedications and C. C . & Rs? And, I have been told by sources in city hall that this is exactly what the city will require for any POAL-Mita issued in the future . DMI� 3 Response The 6tatement regarding a property owner ' s ability to rehabilitate the f iecade of a st n;c1tu,-e without emit lemenL , so long as no square footage is added , is accurate . The comment is rioted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . DML a Comment Additionally , a fourth option, transferring or srchanging the "Heritage, square Block," project: to this site (Nest 200 Main Street) and. the "Facade Grant ?,coc'sram" to the former "Heritage Square ©lock" site , Gast 300 Block Main Street) should be addressed . In Socta on 4 . 5 , or, page 87 -- Alternatives Sites bt;ates : "Wo reasonable and feasible alternative: sites were located � because the western 200 block is the only block rxth a significant number of re:Ghabitable buildings and vacant prone:ty to carry out the facade grant program ;!nd meet: the project objectives . " This East: 300 Block. is :►o; only feasible , it is , in fact , a superior .projeot sito in every- way. The least .fir,: D'lo.uqk of stain Street is composed or mainly non--discxipt buildings of 40 ' s , 50 ' s, and 60 ' s origin without any redeeming architectural signif- icano;e. The City staff currently conceptually plan a "Heritage 5guare Block" for, this site. Unfortunately, they will be Jor: ,,% d to relocate any "Heritage" they wish to showcase in t:hi.s block as there are but two important structures currently :ly : t:h,. W. P .A . post: Cffice , and the Spanis,. revival 20 ' s auto dealership building . Now contrast the West 200 dock of Main Street : Fifteen significant historic buildings, some of National Historic Register caliber, most of focal significance. Currently, staff plan the "Facade Grant program" for this more logical wildritage Sguars" site- worse, by staff action, they are actively encouraging the destruction of these f iteen historic building$ and replacement with now construction. In #prt, the V.f ty "policy" under section 3 .3a, page 68-69 on offering historic buildings for relocation in a sham, because 10 out �s of 15 of the buildings tare of xasonry` construction, and thug unmVigable. what reads as cons.:vientious effort is, in fact, cynical tongue-in-creek. (3735d) -2- JDOUGL ASS M. LANGEVIN ' � "Owner" 217 Malu Strtet 81% Pawtucket give Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r`i 14) %0.5872 REC l , T' September 7, 1989 Ms. Kc- y Min, Assistant 1r inner Ms. U%ura Phillips, Associate Planuer DEPArTMEANIT cis- City of Huntington Bc=h Cr)`.11'.111t%, y L1!:TLZPIA5NT Pla u ng Depexhmit PLAIVNING DIVISION 20(X1 Main Sutet Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: gnvirunmental Impact Report 89-4 Dmr Kelly: Pursuant to our phon.: .:onvtrsation of August 31st, I am enclosing my comments and coxrectians to E.I.R. 89-4. As a property owner in the subject area, as well as a member of the Huntington Beach Hictonc Resources Board, I was unable to review B.I. R. 89-4 with the Board DML 1 due to this obvious conflict of intemst. Arcordingly, I am thenfm submitting r y own review anti comxnents on E.LR. 89-4 as an inydAved property owner. Semi on_2.2 -.PMJC&t 0j cteds&j. Page #4: thider this heading, 2 options ;,m given. Both requim partisclpadon in it City-sponsored program with specific land dedications and C.C. and R's which are rsequimd tn;un with the land (added to the Teed). Missing Cori this section is a third option which would allow propeel, owners to participate without mddng any land dedications or DML 2 sxgaing C.C. and R's by not accepting any grant moneys, alternatively financing the work thenuelveri. Section 3.1, on Page #35 states: "Pteadntly psopeny owners can rebabyilitate the facades of th,;ir structures without entidetnent f vm the City as Iong as they are not adding square footage." I question the validity of this statement, I have owned 217 Main Street for over 10 yeah. During this dime, ,I have been unable to get a pemt to build a fend; -.round my empty back lot, even though high hates of vandalism were present in the area. If the. City staff won't let me pmt%t DML 3 the rear or my buildily what chance do I or anyone alse have of setting a perxrat to do= work with;Um*m% athe land dedications end C.C. and R's? Anc I have been told by sources in City is exactly what the City will require for any permits issued in the futum. Additionay, a fl utth option, transferring or cxchgnIF9 the ''Fleritage Square Block' pro, t to this site(West 200 Main Saw) anti the "facade Grant gram" to the former "Heritage Square Block" sin, oUst 3W Block; Main Street) should be addressed. In Section 4.5, on Page 087 - Alternatin Situ-sRuuses: "No on "c and feasible saltemsative sites wresra located because the wate.rn 200 bkKk is die only block with a si if3cant number of tehabilitamble buildings and ve t ro out doIsgrdt Grant pro prasParrty ate► gmin sknd meet the protect ftvdvee The I t 304 block is not onty feasible, it is, in fact, a superior project site in Ito +. way. 'IU 4 East 3W block ot Main Street is a xoposed of mairstly non-iisCnpt buildings of.4 Ts, Ws, and WS eri+ tr Wkhm my rodtt�dng arclAw-tusal siSniftence. The City staff currently cinceptual►ly pit-,I a t Block" fcw this site. Unfortunately, they will be fo.=4 to relocate any `'Hwit�t� a**y ws1M to showcase 1n this block as there we but 2 important str>yctures ctirrentt : IU W- .A. PWt Qfl , and Jo Sponish revival 201s auto dea "ip building. Y A. + K • Now contrast the West. 200 clock of Min Street, Pirtecn significant historic &Jlding!, Fotne of National Historic Register ca:iber; most of h, %ignificance. Currently, Staff plen the "Facade Grant h-ogran)" for thi- ,gore logi+gin'. 'Vexitisge 3g hare" site. Worse, by Staff action they are actively encouraging the aistructi3mr o: these fifteen historic b�CTI-Ifff ",, istoric h new constiucrion. In fact, the City "Policy" and(-Ar Section 3.3A MIL buildings for relocation is a shain, because 10 out of 15 of the buildings are of trasonry construction, and thus unmovable. What reads as con scien+ious�r•,rrfplt isiq$9fact, „yriical tongue-in-cheek. c��Anrn+�r•:r v� Them is +out one 1)ricLl conclusion: to truly carry out the high ,gdutpeobjCcdVW�6F both the -icede Grant Ilmgmm" and the "Heritage Square Block" thesis two p;r.PrmsrshoU14% switched:V'Heritage Square Block" should apply io West 200 block of Main Street, and the "Facade Gram DML 5 program' should apply to cast 300 block of Main Rtrcet. Secliarr 3.1. QQsite e:ci5+ip� land u,t ,.�' �. 5.4,.th paragra= 205 Main Street i- a DML 6 a = building stnd 207 Main Saoet i3 a 1 112 st=building. 5S.Qfi n 3.2 - LiaodforM not IQRQ aphy"NZy# tae�_raph: 5 fuIl lots arc Znlir C DML. 7 dlrt and two lots are one-haltua2ave� dirt. ,- Section 3.3 - HiStgricrd Er, ougggs. Pzgg_# 5. • st parat:nph: The Historic name of 2171'rt'•in ,Street, is "The T l�I th=aa BuUdigg". $: The ve.YiLal-paned transom, above the store windows and door are ori�.ginal ��cow�g�,features. ' ,?ggr, Sri, 19 paragr This building il the fir£k joint project of the Talbert-Leatherman Partnership. • In 1904 "The Piozw- cd And FUeI Co." was locai.:d here as the first =upants, and offered fend for horse: and domestic ardmals, heating fuel for house?, and Gasoline DML � tar automobiles. gapl � 217 Main Street is the oldest building in the bloc . th A 217 Main Sweet is currently a religious 4. ¢5_ ist pangn h- This building is the oldest remaining structure ?n the Dlgck (or project area) This building is significant as an example of n "CeliforniAHZUSe" built western false nt stnrcture, J Section 3.5 rAgn J Z4JX Alt►i�$• l only analysed 2 entries emit of 20 in Appendix "�C" - Parking table; or 1096 of the total. ' `bey are as follows: 9 This buildin WU originally a vaudeville theme with a raised stage and wings with dressing moms bee ath. = the usage chttn� ed, it became a 1 112 story commeercial storefront with the stage wings, and dressing rooms snTact, used for storage, (totalling ::bout 500 sq• feet of ind DML 9 story). The building stayed this way until 1981 when the cumrrnt occupant started illegally boatle&ing in sections of Mezzanine. This was alone in lour stages over the 1987 - 1988 pee.od without permits. A casual examination will show the Mezkx nine to not meat code. The bootleg MCUanffie Owen appmxinantely 1.350 squaw feet, so the 2,950 sq. foot 2rtd story of 207 Main Stet in Appendix actually consists o 500 sti- feet of 2nd story, 1,3s0 sq. feet of Bootleg 2 Mezzanint recently constru, , and 1,100 sq. feet of air shaft (St attachment IJ) - It doesn't cxi4:l .Also, the use given is "Retail/Office". 11heie is no office space in this building. it is all retail., So the actusd requirement is 1 parking space ptv 200 sq. feet. If you 11V iv�er4 d't jo� rt�le_, constructed sq. fompo-, (3,450 sq. feet), the. parking requirement is 1 lcon true e: ale Mezzanine 1 3SQ s . feet would add f�.!SO s a . 1'it it Ward's s cdBoo g ( � a ) �' r breaking the law, and I don't think anyone gives parking credit for 1,100 sq. feet of air. FP 1 a 1981, DEPAr<r!,VI f 0" This building co'ns41s of a singic-story storefront with a permit-ad3ed`thtRtMMi dddf ibn ' Th main building 6 1,210 sq. feet, not 1,100 as in Appendix The bathrootfi'W ldiiti;hnLtldh.�-'T6 sq. � `tet for a total of 1,226 sq. feet, 126 sq. feet rnz rc: 6mn listed in Appendix "C". Appendix "C" gives the use as "reading room". If you will reter to Attachmeta "A" and "Win this letter, you will i see that the occupancy permit actually is for "A non-profit meeting hall (not to be used as a churrh)" tend, in fact, this is exactly what 217 Main Street has been used as for the last 10 .,ears or more. DML 9 Additionally, the "maximum occupant load permitted - 80" tells you it is not a reading room. The same church group has occupied 217 Main Street since Tune, 1979, holding meetings every Tuesday Find Thursday night with occasional use on -'.her even'ng., but only as a meeting hall. Th,; parking requirement, as given in H. D. Ordinance Code 5e%, 9606..0 (Please refer to 1,ttachment "C") is "1 parking space per 35 square feet of public assembly area, or 1 per 3 fixed seats, whichever is greater." (There are no fixed seats in the building, only folding chairs being used.) The actual parking re uirement for 217 Main Street therefore, is 35.029 spaces, 'lot 3.667 spaces as given in Appendix "C". By City Code, this is rounded off to 36 spaces i►i actual use. (See Atta.;hmont E, Corrected Appenft "C".) I The corrections snow as additional 85% rzgii iced parking for existing sgaare tootag(-. in this 11% sample area. It further addr, a full 8.65% re'iuired parking spaces to the project as a whole, even if there are no other mist.*e;a Based on this sample, plus the fact than there are 16 adc'litional buildings yet to be re-Analysed (89% of the total project) one can only conclude that the entire Appendix "C" par!-iing table appears to be invalid. If true, any decisions arising from figures from Appendix "C" are pP*tly or completely incorrect. These would include, but not be limited to! DML1.C Prc;i,i&;.;►annrnary, p. # XIV - Parking Table "A`',p. #10 - Project Charactm-ristics "fable "A", . # 1: , Statistical Square Footage, Exhibit 9, &*isting Land Use Section 3.5, Parking, p. # 74 - 82 in its entir-.ty Section 6.5, p. 'r'94, Parking, 1 Appendix "C", in its entirety e elan �. - Other s�.wt - Ind���gts 1�� 89. �ugrag�anh: The goal of more than doubling retail square footage as , Option L will most certainly affect local traffic congestion, resulting in local air quality impact., local noise level impacts, and local public service demand DML13 increues. Seg ion .1, 1MR1 krciaEpliod Not To Be Sigailicant, Page 90i Air, Noise, Public. Services, Project gencuted traffic will be stgnifics%ndy impacted if Option 2 buildout is achieved, MOM thLn doubling ratan squatfiootFige in this project tuts. DMIli12 I hope these. findings, cormctdons, Find conments will be of some use to you in our common Soil of improving the quality of life here in Huntington Beach. Yours Sincenly, glu M. l,.Angovin 3 i rt,,D C. I ' APPL I CAT I ON FOR C M I F I CATI OF OCCUPANCY 1*j=of Huntington peach _ ;+ri .�� tmrnt of oevrloomert yarvioes l4''' P;.imr TO FI!L IN (Print or Tyne only; ,I --- Application is ;tereby made for a Certificate of Occupancy for 1: iy,;� ,�,:ur�► ?.�teriiv�- rrrice _ Oc;,gpjngX: Gr.2q Div Describe Mines,, lisp. � Cr:^�7 7.-, i;t i.j,:.l t ' ri /I 11 .Cirl f AM AW be known as Located at >t�L ?I�resS 'NZ- E?aA'�StK Now: r3 !t 'i_VW M.1 es t d encc t,c7�r ass` " iy- _ Zip _ Phone•►;^ . - Business . P.esidence: ASAiE: —ty _�1� i10nt 1�0. THIS USE VOU!b BE DESCMED AS: O Newly Constructed Building Chanrie of Owner . ; Chancre of Occupant QD existing Buildiiiy [_; Changj cf Ilse Additional Occupant Indicate fcrmer use if any 0::L, anc : Gr. Div. ctupancy of any ui l i� n promo (tec�T a`�a us r.ess�Trccns7 M 77nc' +be Issue ^� until the building has been inspected and a Certificate of Occupaniry in issued. 2. No electrical service will be ,-Pleased for any existing building unti ; i��►+ I service haF beer. inspected and certiriea safe. All applicants for occupancy { J / in an existing huilding are rccluired to schedule an electrical ' I'+ise jp, inspection 'n the Department of Building and Con r+uni ty Developm.,w at the time this application is riled. 3. CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY OR USE INSPECTION FEE. Whenever it is necessary to make inspection of a Gui iding or premises in order to deternire if' a change may be made in the character of occupancy cc• use of the building or premises which could place the building in a different division of the same grwp of occupancy or in a different group of occupancy. a change of occupancy inspection fee of M.OG shall be paid to the City . (Fn . nl f ,ri. 1151 . ,10 ' 00 SUMEWNTAL I NFOR AT iON 1�"r�/„. Sq. ft. of bui (ding_ _ _ _ Pian :'hc► ti t,o. __ ...- -- -.. .__._.._ Occupancy Group_�___�t�...� _ ___.� t'i?rf"it flo. _—_ __-• _ _ . . _�_ _ Occupant load _ _ %dmin. Action No. of Stories__ _..._ .� -. _... . . . . tro. rarkinn Ilr,�1 th '.)Pj1f , Ap'.' •oval �.__�I��Vi�.Ii,f' . .. . . _�;, t" _ . ;+t . t t ir•. i'elna:rd ._.� ' • . . .��'� _._.Y.. tCA�,t Oi t,tX,.;PA'iCY I iE S _.t►�?Q. ;'i' i';'�,!ir� �ti� 'E i►crr ( ftICN Ff r'7• P� ,. ... - �' . . •fib - ,� "�.�+ ' t• i ,ice r •• .� Y. �1 h . -„ � . � - � / _ � - � � '.-. � 1 r.. .•/+rid'+5dl, � 5� :•, ,yY,...i � `` ��.k ���' . CERTIFICATE 14 a l� CITY • ' DEPA14TMENT OF BUILDING & COMMUNITY riEVELOPMENT NON-PROFTT HFrTING USED AS A CMIRCM r uv Dolly LancovA ripf 1 1 .y Holliffilly Off". it w2 J I 10 9606 Number uL a-, ice re�uj red , The minimum ryumk���'`"91 ,, .�, u�vlsln ok 1 -$Er Na I-nn9 spaces s"iw hFIY Z W t fortn irl trsis s� ' ion . Poo the purpose of thiic s(ccti ( ;i , the square footage indicated shall mean the of the use unles Otherwise indicated . when mail,-cuilat:i,4r%rl,!,iltfc:lude any fraction , one full parking space shall eudNmet-,'UIiO" for -uch £ ract: iona .l space . ( a ) Susineas use Use Parkii__j Sea es Required A . Autry anu machinery 1/ 500 square feet , but no service yarayes. less than S Auto , ooat ; tr. ai ier sales 1 /-L000 square feet cat lot and rental (agencies ; ,urea accessible for other outdoor commerc.:al public, viewing , but no uses including retail Jess than 10 nurseries L l R . Boat rnarir►a 75 per boat ,slip c . car wash ( 1. ) Fu ,l1-service 10 ( 2 ) Se 1 t - e d v ice 1 . 5 per wash stall Churches , theaters , cluos, 1 per 35 square feet of lodges , sucial halls , public assembly area , or a Ijditnrium,-:f , funeral 1 per 3 fixed seats ( 18 homers and mortuaries itches shall be 1 seat ) whichever is greater F . Food ano bever•ige est:atJlish- ment/nightcltlbs With more than twelve spats : ( 1 ) separate parcel 1/60 square feet. i 12 ) Within. integrated 1/100 square reek Complex ( 3 ) Anci 1 laa.y dance c : oors 1 /50 square feet of area. devoted to dancing ( 4 ) pri►v�-ttiru t3ci, lities Stacking credit may be applied toward aoove requirement per sec- tion 9605( e ) r`r , „t k ll z 5_ , r�• f . env 1 ; 1989 r.:r f STIR WFI, — sxiq E3�cii'L,CIG�MlfiZINIl1lR AttAr.....-, ...,. i ,l ._w._...1 oai�m AL t WI A&Lf MAt� 1.340 13, Ai' A' �►LLEV sr IMP'Iv A14114Arr i7x6o .20x :%S 5000, .217 6o 14 Agsv a4so A380 D to a k.ljo� .2 45 •3%aa 1 60 M EZZINIME. AREA MO A Ms Mswq 04 k t �. N ; N � � i R b W Cr i L u W E �" K SR c217 MAIN ST. /aq 13 RACE GOT M I7`t N er 1�AIr!" M ALE.. , xy �Cp all" X ysa ALLEY 1 to 01 q"GAP— SUIt~DIN61% -UTUMi A413 14811 l 1 D tJ' I ,ib CZ' 13' 162%A6 C3 . TOYotrl.. BulIbtNG ApeA 0%950 C3 Id- 1 .2LAGa' i 7A4 q' EAPTY LOT AkItA ,K ,Lr i I 1 L Us ATTACHMENT E RECEIVED 1� 1 S� LNXAXW 0CPA14TMCNIr OF• COMMUNITY UCVf:I.CPMENr f'L AfVfYfht- � Main 5,9m 1/200. 1i300 24.583 l,,'Pacr,s 217 Irisin Rear ing Room 1/300 1I&E Spaces 7;(.W Sq.Fi, 2ft. w0 Spaces I � �xifi iris a.rt. ELT king �.C1���S1A� i� 'I 7 Main 3,450 Retail 1/200 1"'.250 spaces 217 Main L� t meeting Hall 1/35 35.QZ2 Spaces 4,616 Sq.Ft. 52 279 Spaces • ,I a 4 �, ' Historic Resources Board r CITY OF HUNTNGTON BEACH �+ 6'ost Office Brix 190 Hun;Iirigtori 3each, Cal0c)rnizi 92648 September 'Z(1, 1989 F r. City of Huntington Beach Dept . of Community Development; P .O . Box 190 Huntington Beach , Ca . 92648 I>I:?Art TMFt4T c I.UL ' Att : Kelly Main ti '�ANN1Nt; t)1V1: .• •. Re : Review and cominents-- Draft E . I . R . No . 99--4 Dear Kelly , 'hank you for giv4. ng the Historic Resources Board ;,Z,e opportunity to review the Draft E . I .R . No . 89-4 . After reviewing this document; the Board had the following comments . The statement on page 2r etatcs , The Downtown Specific flan was adopted by City Co-tincil in 1983 with Lhe intent of reycognizi.rig the H 1 rich downtown histary as the central focus of the City ' s civic , recreational , and business activities . We believe from that s6-atemer,t than, that this Environmental Impact Report does not adequately addreiso that Etatement . Some examples that we found are : ii A. The property at 211-5th Street (Terry Body Shop ) was demolishe14 2 prior to the completion of this F . I . R . , by the City of Huntington Beach . B . On pace 86 , mentions they property at 411 Olivet as one of "the give remaining vacant parceals " , this property is not vacant but is the current site of the Huntington Beach Surf HILB 3 :4usevm. This structure along with the Shank House at 202-5th Street has been declared historic and has had an application submitted to the city for rehabi l i t i on . C, On page 4 . under the options the E . I . R . is remiss in not mentioning the obvious third option that being to allow the independent property owner the option to rehabilitate his H 4 property without the aid of a city sponsored Facade Grant Program. D. under Historic Resources on page 93 , #2 needs clarification , review by who (City Council , Planning Commission , Design H 8 Review Board , historic Resources Hoard , etc . ) This statement to ambiguous . to roviotving this E. I .R . , we could not find any financial break- dOft tes the different optiono/alteyrnatives nor was an economic � '. & 4yvis prepared to shav the property owner the different *4**nt49es connected with each option/alternative. ' , f�qs•�,' '��"•,�w°;'• � . i fir. .yam► Ott concl.uf• thit this project, will have significant impact on the historical resources of our city . These are just but a few of the inadoquacies found in En% ironmental impact Pe-,,r)rt Hp,8 7 go . 89-4. ncerely, eery ;, ersoa chair, man Historic Resources Board i Mr :91 c i� � r•" �yif'fr''' '• J .- ti. 4 ,k.d 1 fluntin8torl Nnch FiFIoric8l R ECEIVED F P 1 A e ►tember 1989 ; roe►,���,�:;;��- t�'•. :r...:f .. _.;r PLANNI►;U DIVISION Kelly Main-, Envi:onmental Officev City of Huntington Beach. Huntington Beach, CA Fear Kelly, 1 have reviewed EIR 83-4 for the society and wish to malte3 the following comments on its behalf : This E112 represents a conscientious effort to catalog the historic buildings within, the rehab project urea. Nowever, there are several changes due to new information or initial oversight which should be made. HB 1 . 2U6-62a6 Main St . Th..: 3 is the site of the early Ugatingt . New inspection indicatea that the building on this site is of masonry construction , and is , therefore, unlikely to be the original building. Despite thiaex it does date before the 1936 earthquake because it sshoas ovidence of peat, earthquake damage renovation. 2. 217 Main St. , This should be referred to as the "Tal.be rt/Leathearman" building, ackseitowledging its conssstruction HBHS 2 ty thecae two city pioneers . 3 . 223 Main St. The Burkhart build+ng was designed in the styled of Irving Gill , but , �tent�iwe library research is unable: to connect it, directly with him. An early city resident has recently stated that the owner, Frank Hurhhart, designed the btruscture. Despite the lack of direct _,ela- HBHS 3 tionsship to the master Southern California architect, Irving Gill , this commercial structure &3 ,still locally significant because it is the only one in Huntington Beach which reflects M4 influence. 4 . Main street Historic District . The rehab proJect block, alone , constitutes a potential historic dis- trict even though the Integrity of the earlier proposed bWndariesss has been, compromised , An application for National HUS 4 Mai rater status should be made for Just the block to verify Its status and eligibility for federal assistance programs. ,y I Yl 4; 1'01) .. .; _.. ..'..e. ,;: •�i;'fir. ti";t , 1 y�t•R S ' v (!rM � iJ 1 1 va Oe discussion of the alternatives to thi S project is inarl:.rquate. . At least two of the al.t tirnat iti,es are as recognized & .; arivironment.ally superior to the project , br,7t there i S AOL anaugh data to determine th-u- economic f easi- bi } i ty of ( i t,h(-)-. . e::,-unpJ V , Till Ml7ITV6 )n 111 ►CLI'.'. _)- - tent.ial use of Federal tax credit t:a make r011abi.li.tat,.i.ot, gi&Fi5 more attractive thvi de.-mcili.tian . ortless these. alternat, .ves } are proven i nfeas iblcs by new data ( which will Probably re- quire re.cirou 'Lation of the , the lead agency will Lie un- atile to lustify a statement; of overriding c an!5iderat.i.on to approve the p.,o i ect; . Siucar,:,ly , �7 bare Milko ch Socioty Vice President . � � r 4, J, 1' k. DOUGLAS M. L NCEVIN (DML) DML i Comment �+ Pursuant to our phone conversation of August 31, 1989. 1 am enclosing my comments and r correcttons to Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 89-4. As a property owner in the subject Ares, as well as a member of the Huntington Leach Hirptor;c Resources Board, I was unable to review EIR No. 99-4 -with the Board due to this obN)ious conrlict of ir,terest. Acoordingly, I am therefore submitting my own review and ccmments on EIR No. 89-4 as an Involved property owner. UML. 1 Response The comment Is noted and included in the final record of the project. DML 2 Comment 4 1 Una this heading, two options are given. Both require participation in a City-sponsored hem with specific land dedications and C.C. do R.s. which are required to run with the land (addca to the Deed). Missing from this section is a third op-6,on which would allow property owners to participate without making any land dedications or signing C.C. do R.s. by not accepting any grant money%, alternatively financing the work themselves. DML 2 Response r i f The p.-elect (CUP No. 89-•1 and CDP 89-1) for which the EIR was prepared addresses additiiati *o or construction of buildings can the block pursuant to the f ,:ade Cranc Program adopted by City Council. Participation in the program by property owners is voluntsii,y. property owners may choose to obtain alternative financing, however this would not exempt them from compliance with standard City regulations and policies ` (rich as dedlcation of land, where applicable). UM.L 3 Comment Sectift 3.1, on page 35 states: "Praeently property owners can rehabilitate the facades of their structures without entitlement from the city as long as they are not adding square footage." 1 questlan the validity of this statement. Y have owned 217 Main Street for over ten yea v. During this time, I have been unable to get a permit., to build a fence around my empty back lot, even though high rates of vandalisin were present in the area. if the city staff won't let me protect the rear of my building, what chance do I or anyone else have C.�a It to do C work without granting the city land dedications and ? And, I have n told by sources in city hall that this is exactly what i:he city will nmpd a for any permits issued in the future. . 3 Reese r ebaaw t ressn ins a property owner's ability to rehabilitate the facade of a wl t without entitlement, air long as no square footage is added, is accurate. The is tl MW Ud incline In dw final of the pro)ect for review and ' xe dir�cliilonatakers. 1 ' .4 , � .�•• 4 DML 4 Comment Additionally, a fourth option, t:'afater i In$ or exchanging the "Heritage Square Black" project to this site (West 200 Main Street) and th( "Facade Grant Program" to the fo<mer "R ritage Square Mock" site, (Fast 300 Block Main Street) should be addressed. In Section 4.5, on pa&e 87 i- Alternative Sites - states: "No reasonable end feasible alternative sites were., located 'because the western 200 block is the only block with a significant iiumber of rehabi table buildings and vacant property to carry out the facade grant program and meet the project objectives." The East 300 Block is net only feasible, it is, in fact, a superior project site in every way. The East 300 Block of Main Street is composed or mainly nun-(liscripi buildings of 40's, SO% end 60's origin without any redeeming architectural significance. The City staff currently conceptually plan a "Heritage Square Block" for this site. Unfortunately, they will be forced to relocate any "Heritage" they wish to showcase in thi► block as there are but two important structures currently: the W.P.A. Post Office, and the Spanish revival 20's auto dealership building. Now contrast the West 200 Block of Main Street: Fifteen significant historic buildings, come of National Historic Register caliber. most of local significance. Currently, staff plan the "Facade Grant Program" for this more to lcal "Heritage square" site. Worse, by staff action, they are activEly encouraging the destruction of these fifteen historic buildings and replacement with new construction. In fact, the City "Policy" under section 3.3s, page 68-69 on offering historic buildings for relocation is a sham, because 10 out of 15 of the buildings are of masonry construction, and they unmoveable. What reads as conscientious effort is, in fact, cynical tongue-in--cheek. i DIAL 4 Response Gne facet of the Facade Grant Program involves distribution of Agency funds to property owners who improve the appearance of buildings on the Mock, most of whic,,% buildings are of historic significance to the community. The City has determined that encouraging both facade rehabilitation and now constructilii in this block will best meet the project objectives stated ast page 13 of the EIR Section 2.5 - Project Objectives. 'Therefore, no alterative sites were chosen. For a discussion of the alternatives that were examined please refer to Section 4.0 - Alternatives to the Proposed Project. DML 5 Comment There is but one logical conclusion: to truly carry out the high sounding objectives of both the "Facade Grant Program" and the "Heritage Square Block" these two programs should be switched: *Heritage Square Black" should apply to west 200 Block of Main Street, and the "Facade Grant Program" should apply to east 300 Bloch of Main Street. DML 5 Resperose The comment is noted and Included in the final record of the project for review and ONUUmtIon by appropriate decisionmakers. i�iL1 �Amp, 1 ti A Mow t1IN} , d •nil N DIU 6 Comment Foe tth Paragraph: 205 Mein Street it a alflZ1CL= building and 207 gain Street is a I 112 stare building. fait L b Respmie Section 3. 1 of the Final FI9 will W. corrected accordingly. t DML 7 Comment r Tint Psrwaph�: 3 W1 lots are Varcly unoarrad dirt and two lots are ant-jjalf 4 i MOO 7 RORXMG k Sectim 3.2 of tlRe Final EIR will be corrected accordingly. DML S Camim nt .,f SAC= 3.3 -WSIQU L RF Lid ES s i s FWt Psr mph: The hUuxic name of 217 Main Street is "IbS Tay rt,,-, LeOSbKmjjA TbIrd Patapp .: TM verticallmncd tramoms above the store wkAbws and door are features. Pitt The buildins it ttae first joint pmjwt of the Talbert--Leaftrmun s ` Soiod Paregrq*.- IU. )W wj"am End aW U&I CampW was locatod here at the fit tx a offered heed for boron and dime*tic madmalso � rad IQI fir trines. and saWirm for �rut� mobiles. 217 Main SU"t is the west bulk al in ti-A � �w rtr 117 Math$p"t fa rCta•. htl�r a t�►1i i us 4'y'''1,;1',j •''o + �'�,1b it, .I, ��,� "Is wwtft b tm Oldm ramaloft structure in (or r wand Paragraph: This building is significant as an example of a UPEOMI&lift=" built western false front structures. i DML 8 Response Section 3.3 of the Final F1R will be corrected accordingly. 126IL 9 Cam ment Page 7r. i _,,st Paragraph: 1 only analyzed two entrie.9 out of 20 in Appendix "C" - Parking table or 10% of the total. They are -3s follows: 207 Win Street This building was originally a vaotiville theatre with a raised stage and wings with dressing rooms beneath. When the use!age changed, it became a 1 V2 story commercial storefront with the stage, wings, and dressing rooms intact, used for storage (tntaling about 500 square feet of 2nd story). The building stayed this way until 1997 when the current occupant started illegally bootlegging in sections of"' zzanine. This was none in four stages over the 1987-1989 period without permits. A casual examination will show the Mezzanine to not meet code. The bootleg Mezzanine covers approximately 1,350 square feet, so the 2,950 square foot 2nd story of 207 Main Street in Apper dix "C" actually consists of 500 square feet of 2nd story, 1,3SO square feet feet of bootleg Mezzanine recently constructed, and 1,100 square feet of air shaft _ it doesn't e0st! Also, the use given is "retail/iy,i five". There is no office "cc in this building, it is all retail, So the actual regWrement is one parking space per 209 square feet. If you only give credit for code-constructed square footage (3,450 square feet'). ':'he parking requirement is 17.250 qxces. The illegally constructed bootleg mezzanine (1,350 square feet) would add 6.7S0 spaces if the city rewards breaking the law and I don't think anyone gives parking credit for 1,100 square feet or air. 217 Main Street This building consists of a single-6tory storefront ruche a permit,-added bathroom addition. The main building is 1,210 aquare feet, not 1,100 as in Appendix "C". The bathroom addition adds 16 square foot for a total of 1,226 sq+aaret feet, 126 square feet more then listed in AppoWix "C". Appendix "C" gives the use as "reading ro m". If you wIII refer to Attachment "A" and "B" in this letter, YM will tee that the Occesps=y pOrmit actually is for "a ton-pooh t meeft hall (trot to be used as a church)" and, In fact, this is exactly what 217 Main Street hka been used as for the lost 10 ,years it XWe. Additionally, the maximum OcCupant load permitted - SO" t tells you it is mat a tesadirrg raatn. Thee same church vow hair oca'Wed 217 Main Straett since Junn, 1979, holding meeetfnp every -4- wr 1 -fluo 1 T"esday and Thursday night with occasional use on ether evenings, but only as a meeting hall. The parking requ;re ment, as given +n � Huntington Reach Ordinance Code Section 9606-C (please refer to � Attachment "C") is "i parking space per :35 square feet of public assembly area, or 1 per 3 Fixed seats, whichever is greater" (there are no fixed sets In the building, only fcidling chairs eyeing fined). The actual parking requirement for 217 Main Street therefore, is 35.029 spaces, not 3.667 spaces as given in Appendix "C". By bity code, this is rourded off to 36 spaces in actual us!!. WAL 9 Response The square footages listed in Table 0, page 11, of EiR No. 8.9--4 and repeated in the F.xiRting Parking Requirements table in Appendix C of th-a document are meant to be approximation-i of the existing square footage on the block. These riunribers are to be used only to determine whether there is a parking deficiency on the � lock. ',these figures are not to be used to determine how many parking spades are to be grandfathered in as part of the Facade Grant Program. As you have noted, some structures will have greawr square furctage then listed, others will have leas. To clarify this point within the document, the following note will be added to both the previously mentioned tables and to the dhi%niission in supply/demand f E for existing park g step demand o � page 7S o iR No. 89-4: Note: Square footaC,..s/parking requirement:;; listed are appro::rmations of the existing square font.-4es/requirements within the Demonstration Block. These figures are not to be toed to Calculate the amount of space to be grandfathered, in as I part of the City's Facade Grant Program. i In addition, litigation Measure No. 1 of the Parking section, page 92, will be changed to j read: I. The City of Huntington Beach shall be responsible for in-lieu fees to cover parking spaces required for the existing square footage in the Demonstration Block. ees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits or a certificate of occupancy, whichever comes first. The number of spaces to be grandfathered mutt be agreed upon by both the property owner and Redevelopment Agency and existing square footages should be verified as part, of the architectural plans accompanying any prpject applications. DAIL 10 Comment The corrections show or; additional 85-/a required parking for existing square footage in this 11% sample area. It further adds a full 8.65% required parking spaces to the project as a whole, even if there are no uthe'•r mistakes. Based on this sample, plus the fact that them are 16 additional buildings yet to be re-analyzed (89% of the total project) one can only conclude that the entire Appendix "C" parking table appears to be int►slid, If true, OW decisions arising from figurmi from Appendix IV are partly or completely incorrect. T1Me would incluue, but not be limited to: Project Table A", page 10 - Project Charac, page XIV - Parkineristics Fable "B", page 11 - Statistical Square Footage ambit 9. Existing Land Use tlon S.S, parkin, page 74-82 in its entirety Sectim 6.51, page 94, Parking, 1. A#iperidfx "C", In its entirety �S- ' + 0 . Wmw\ •ip DML, 10 Respnnse As noted In DML 9 Re"nse, the estimation of the parking deficizncy wi01111 the Demonstration 'Block 6 are xpproxima ticm. 'the major;ty of th,-- lases Within the Demonstration Block fall within the categories of restaurant. general tetail Iw office u: e.. The "meeting tall" at 1.17 Main Street is quite arh unusual use for the project area and 4S an atypical parking requirement compared to uses within the project area. Therefore, the 85% change in parking equirernents in your 1L% sample area is not In any way representative of the rernainder- of the Demonstration Block. A more general app. ox-lrnation of parking demand at the site can be made using the parking ratio for gencrel commercial developments: I spac:- per 2DO square feet. Given the 53,000 square fget estimated to ex'.st in the block and the parking demand ratio of l space per 200 square feet, the required number of spaces for the Hock would be 265. 'The estimated parking demand given in EIR No. 89•-4 &! o os s p lirking dernand of 277 spaces, a number quite close to 265. Taking all the previously mentioned factors into cons:ideraCon, the foliswing Statement in EYR No. 99-4 is more thsn adequately supported by the estirnadun of the current parking eemand for the block: "The existing parking supply (Qci the Demonstraiion Block) does not meet current demand for the project block and currentiy there exists a subs�tantlai deficiency." (page 75). In addition, the calculation of the existirg parking deficiencies for the Demonstration L1ock is included in the "Existing Conditions" section of the parking study and in no way effects the impact assesxment section of the study. Project-specific parking impacts � from the proposed project were as-essed based upon the possible -total square rootage for the block and the total number of parking spaces to he provided. Cumuiative. parking irupac"s from the project were aasesssed based upon the total square footage of the � prayed project and related projects in the area, as well as the proposed parking spaces �I to be provided within the area. Assessment of the praject's parking impacts iv_ not effected by the: analysis c f existing deficiencies onsite. DML I Comment SECUDS 5-3 — OTHER QCOMH — 11412UCINOJEEEMI Pam SeemW Paragraph: The goal of more then doubling retail square footage as in Option 2 will most certainly affect local traffic. congestion, resulting in local air quality impacts, local noise level Impacts, and local vublic service demand Increases. DUL 11 Response An artier EIR (EIR 82-•2) was prepared in 1982 for the Downtown area, inclusive of this profit site. In the discusslcn of the Initial Study for the proposer( project, the City fot'`urW out several potential Impact areas related to the project because the topics were FV1044 ualy addresumd by EIR 22-2. T ave include the areas of traffic, air quality, Wise, fad k9al Oblic services, ?lean refer to Appendix A of the EIR fci• discussion. IN (F'Y 'mow, '!�,�P,��+• ''' '+ � .. ;f 1 J •I 'x2 Comment SA —MACIS EDUM NOT_10 BE SIGNI ICA I �1 r.w}ys ,►ptjist pu1ic serviem, project Senerate:d traffic will be significantly impacted if 2 bulUkmt Is achieved, more than doubhng retail square footsge in 1 Otis project ' th ffttdings, corrections, and comments will be of some use to ,you in our Ps f of improving the quality of life here in Huntington Beach. 12 �e Is . . 0%0* refer to DM). I 1 Response, e wmment Is noted and includ-d in the final record of the project for review and cusideration by the appropriate decisi.onmakers. 1. , I {tir 1. ' 1, _ + ` Mop IT" d _ . r' THE MY OF HRJf+ TINGTON REACH MTORIC RE-SOURCES FOAilRD — (HRB) r HRB i Comment Thank you for giving the Historic Resources Board the opportunity to review the Graft EIR No. 39-4. After reviewing this document the Board had the following comments. The .itaternexnt on page 2 states, '"rhe Downtown Spacific Plan way adopted by City Counc.el in 1983 with the intent of recggnizing the rich downtown history as the central focus or the City's civic, recreational, and business activities." We believe from that statement then, that this Environmental Impact Report does not adequately address that s�tater�erir, ' HFB I itespotrse The comment is noted and included In the final record of the pr;)aect for review and consideration by the appropriate docisionmakers. HR8 7 Comment Some example-, that we found are: A. The pru; t•ty at 7.14--5th Street (Ferry Bcxly Shop) was demolished prior to the completion cat' this 1FIR, by the City of Huntington Beach. iIRS 2 ,Respoose Table B on phge 11 of the EIR will be corrected to show 2i 4 Fifth Street as vacant in the "Existing" colurnn. Page 59 rof :ale EJR motes that the structure "is included In both the City of Huntington Beach Hil;toric Resowwoes Survey 1Z sport acid the Jobn on Heumann Associated Report but had been demolished since the completion of both." The comment is notes and included its the final record of the project for review and consideration by appmpriater derislonmakers. HRB 3 Comment B. On page $6, mentions the property at 411 Olive as one of "the five remaining vacant parcels", this propcz ty is not vacant but is the current site of the Huntington Beach Surf Mineum. This structure along with the Shank House at 202--5th strut has been declare-1 historic and has hats an application submitted to the city for rehabilitation. HR9 S Respite Page 86 of the EIR regarding 411 Olive wV1 be corrected acenr+dingly. the eommenu are noted and included in the final record of the project. HRB 4 Comment C. On page 4, under the options the E!R is remiss in not mentioning the oWbu third option that being to allow the Independent pro rerty owner the option to rehabilitate his property without the aid of a city fired Facade Grant ProStam. y 1 , M � r ., 40 rift T Hite i Rise Pkaft xteler to iMt. 2 Raspo.ase. URI S Comment a D. Under distaste Resources on page 93, #3 needs clarification, review by who (City Ce wwll, Plarming Commission. Desip review Hoard, Historic Resources Ord„ etc.) Tie statement is ambiguous, HRR S Rew"O rbs sftvi r enst refer to apprtyval by f. he Director of Community DevelopmMt. HRX 6 Coraaserrt In rervtowing this EIR we could not Find &&ny financial breakdown for the different Wtk=/e1ta tivas nor wa« an economic snalyAs prepared to show the property owner the diffamt advantages connected with each c4;tlon/alternative. HRR 6 Response CEQA chess not require an fen iroamental impact Report to present financial or economic analysis. CIEQA Guidelines Section 15131 states that, "The focus of the analysis shall be oa p1welcal chmmess," Economic changes or efL,-,is of a project need not be analyzed in &W detail greater tlan necessary to trace the chats~ of cause and effect of changes in the physical environment. In this case* it is not necessary to determine the financial advantages of each project option In order to adequately analyze the impacts on the Onvir am"e t. . HR$ 7 Comment We cmuiudet that this project will have significant impact on the historical resources of our city. Than are Jwt but a few of the inadequacies found in Environmental Impact Repcir No. 89-4. HRH I Resporae Pops 67 ar~ci 68 of Ow RJR - $gject Site Specific Irrnacta and Cwtilatlye Impiacts mote Matt to projft-t will lra1v significant adverr Impacta on historic resources within the City Ratios r,aawt bo mitiptee, to a level of iisignificance, The comment is noted and la tks Baal rea r+d of the project foe review and consideration by w riAta ir�rnt�aicors. a' —9— t �1 i ACH Hff R1C SOCIETY - (HIM a I Casn900ttt ,NtN+v ra rsr+ad SIR No. 0-4 fay the society and wish to make the followirki comments on R t+s a ooWlentlow effort to catalog the historic buildings within the rihabilitatien proJwt area. However, ti'mrs are several changes due to new information WWI which should be made. 1. 205-206 Win Street: This Is the site of the early kluntinatonBeach Nam. New In chop indicat" that the building on this site is of masonry construction, and is, thee tra u dikely to be the original building. ldtaptte this, it does date before the �935 Bart eke berAuse it shows evidence of past earthquake darbage renovation. R Upotise Section 3.3 of t.., final EIR will be amended accordingly. HBM 2 Comment 2. 217 Main Strfrt: This should be referred to as the "Talbert/Leatherman" building, S acknowledging its constru„dnn by these two city pioneers. HRHS 2 Regxmwe Please refer to DML 6 Resp onse. HBHS 3 Comment 3. 223 Main Street: The Burkhart wales designed in the .style of Irving Gill, but extensive literary research is wwble to connect it directly with him. An early city resident has � recently stated that the owner, Frank Burkhart, designed the structure. Despite the lack of direct relatiowhip to the traster Southern California architect, Irving Gill, this commercial structure is still locally significant because it is the only one in Huntfngton Bcach which reflects his influence. HRHS 3 Respow Section 3.3 of the Final EIR will be amended accordingly. HM 4 Comment 4. Mein Street Histat is District: The rehab project block, alone, cottst'tutes a potential hworic strict even thateh the integarlty or the earlier proposed boundaries has been � o protrrbed. An application for National Register stattw should be made for just r the block to vafif!V Its status and eltgibility for federal assistance programs. H*5 4 R Tka wmment It acted uW inclr&rd in the fm: record of the project for review and consWo adon by appl'ofar'iate decisionmakers. -10- y ATE C ,t�.:•' 40 a,. kt m N "matt r ..w AMM s . I bdheo tiro do pasys -- of the alternatives to this project Is inadequate. At least two of 101eatives an r iMW our environmentally superior to the projent, but there is a ____ I& to dew=W the economic feasibility of either. For example, no mention Is mar et twi petontial use of Federal tar credits to make rehabilitation more attractive tl= denollogn, Vnho these alternatives are proven infeasible by new data (which will roodm mdreWation or the EIR)o the l,:ad agency will be unable to Justffy a k st ment of ovMT Ing consideration to approve the project. 11M 5 Respenso All tbr:+e elte tives to the project disc%msed in the EIR are found to be environmentally r4wWr W the Mvpased project in that they reduce potentially adverse impacts on liltWte I t". however the FIR is not required by CEQA to analyze economic feedblilly of the act or of alternativees. Economic feasibility is only a facto.- when the alter approves a project that has significant environmental impacts and rejects mitigation measures or project alternatives based on economic infeasibility of thm measures or alternatives. However, Section 15091 of CEQA allows the deelsianmaker to re+act such alternatives on the basis of social or other considerations which make the a1tes native infeasible. Since economic considerations are na a factor in rejecting alternatives in this case, no comparative analysis is needed. Please refer to exhibits 8 and C. Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Findings. The specific finding adopted by the decisionmaker will be included in the Final EIR. • i �11� 'rx, �, •i -,r.+' r11•,,r ' ` I c, rig,•+' ' A + 1 ' Y ' RX801A)T IOM NO. 1419 A RESOLMON OF THE FLMNING COMISSION 01 THE CITY OF EIl1 'iR R NEACH, CALIFIORMIA, ADOPTING ENVIRONMNTAL II4PACT RXPORT NO. 89-4 IFOR THE MIXED UISE DEMOPMENT BOUNDED BY MAIN RTUXT, WALNUT AVENUE, FIFTH STREET A21D OLIVE AVENUE lAHEREA$, lvvi.ron=ntal Impact Report No . a9-4 and related entitlements have been prepared; and 1, The City of Huntington Beach was the lead agency in tho preparation of the Environmental Impact Report ; and All persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by the ?Manning Commission either throlxgh written, notice or during a public hearing on September. 1.8 , 1989, and such responses and com<rants as were made were duly noted and h responded to . IOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach as follows : CECTION 1 . The Planning Commission does hereby find that Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and all State and local guidelines . SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission has considered all � significant effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4, together with existing and proposed measures co mitigate such significant effects (see Exhibit A) . SECTION 3 . The Planning Commission f ind th;�t through the implementation of this aforementioned ni tigation measures , the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the proposed pkojeat can be eliminated or reduced to a level of Insignificance. SECTION 4 . The Planning Cottamfasion further finds that the benefits accruing t- the City by virtue of implementing the Downtown '` Bpifi�C Flan, ovs�Cri.da the unaitigatable effects detailed in „h,, N wilrOmMatal Ympact Report No . 89 -4 and the attached Statement of OVetridlAt CO nslderations (so* Exhibit B) , and the Planning CbMIsiige of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby adopt and certify as adequate Environmental Impact Report. No . 89-4 . ice. �kd . !.it• _ ':e_ • r . r Y •/+ • F` it 1 r / 0% ONCTION 5. The planning Director is hereby authorised and 4060ted to ,file with the Off too of the County Clerk a notice of. p OWM$ ►atioA for Suviromiental Impoet Report No. 89- 4 , aim required tIbn 21152 of the California Invironmontal Quality Act PAD AXD AW D by the planning Commission of the City of Iiul tington Beach on the loth. day of September, 1989 , by the r following tall csl,l vote: +, pills t , .. AMAIN: Kike Ade ma, Secretary Planning Commission Chairman (3612d) 1�Y f..'f 5,•:, m:,.1 •nlirM 'iil w... .. ,.:_ wrt, 'd .,., :'.n T r , yR.r,nu;K„ r T n Y+ i i r% oEMIDIT A WITI"TION MEASURES IT" i. A sign and landscape plan shall be submitted to the Resign Rovisw board and/nr• City Planning Department by each property awngt prior to approve►l of sign permits . The location and type of all sign6 shall cor.lform to the provisions of the Huntington Batch Ordinance Code and be consistent with the standards listed on page 33 of the Downtown vesign Guidelines . All sighting and landscaping materials shall also be consistent with the guidelines . 2. The City shall encourage end/or sponsor a planned sign program on both *idea of gain Street. This program shall include possible sign amortization, City funded removal of existing signs , and City funned purl:hose and mounting of new signs . 3 . The City shall implement consistency of similar hardscape and � Landscape on both sides of Main Street . 4 . The project sshall, implement the following r0 tigati.on measure included in Downtown Specific Plan EIR No . :33--2 . ' Depending on the results of sails studies conducted fox new � construction mitigating measures will be required to be isxcorporatesd in-�o the project . These measures may include but not limited to : buffer , special grading, special foundations , subdrains , dewatering devices , and retaining walls . g . Con►p}ehensive documentation of the project site , as it cu:;rantly exists , shall be prepared prior to the issuance of any building, grading, and/or demolition permits . The documentation sha'. 1 be in accordance with standards established by the Historical 1uvericen Buildii►gs Survey/Historical American 3agi,neering Records (HASS/HASR) . The report shall be archfvawlly maintained with provisions for public access . The costs aRrsociated with preparation and maintenance of the documentation shall be the responsibility of they Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency. M • �,. 6. Prier to the approval or issuance of any demolition , gradinn, andjor building permits, all facets of the project :-elated to hiato+cfc preservation shrill be reviewed and epproved by the city of Huntington (leach. 7. prior: to the issaance of any demolitiov permits an adequate monitoring and/or bonding program shell be established between ? the City Redovelopment Agency and property owners to ensure that demolition and ccrstra.4.:cion vibration impacts do not adver54ly affect offO.ts* structures . r„y, w� J V�r r) r , S . prior to the issuance of Ruilding Permits, a detailed lighting plan shall be approved by the Department of Community Development . The plats shall be consistent with the Downtown lighting plan and lighting standards in the Downtown Design Quidelinesq, 9 . The City of Huntington Beach Rede3vWopment Agency shall be responsible for in--lieu fees to cover parking spaces required for the e:istirg square footage in the Demonstration Bieck. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits or Certificate of Occupancy, whichever comes first . The number of spaces to be grandfathered must be agreed upon by both the property owner and the Redevelopment Agency and existing square footage should be verified, as part of the architectural plans accompanyLag any project application. 010 . property owAers shall pay in-lieu parking fees for additional square footagee to account £or the added parking demand . fees shall be pai.' prior to issuance of building permits or certificate of occupancy, whichever comes first . The offsite parking spaces shall be in p1cce prior to the final approval of building permits for the new development . 11 . As projects within the parking district , comprised of Downtown Specific Plea Districts 3 and 5a , request development: approval , they shall contribute their " fair-share" towards reducing the cumulative parking demand deficiency. Fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits or c�rttificatee of occupancy, whichever comes first . Tnw offsite parking spaces shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new development . I ' I 1 I •I„ e rr .w Ir, i i IR i'i 1 If y 1 , K N�./.r X9 I�I 0 TT EIS VIR0JWN:AL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89Y-4 8-1AWENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The Final Environmental Impact Report No . 89-4 for the proposed construction of a maximum of 70, 726 squara feet of mixed use development identifies certain unavoidable signtticsnt adverse 4 dnvirowmntal *ffects . CEQA Ouideelines Section 15093 requires the �leaaisioe-soaker (Manning Commission) to balance the benefits of a proposed project against unavoidabRee environmental risks in otermi.ning whether the project should be approved. if the docisivn-maker concludes that the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverso environmental effects, the effects mmy be considered acceptable . Hare, the City of Huntington Boach does find that the benefito flowing to the City and itm resident% from the project outweigh the significant adverse environmental effects Which remain after the projectle mitigation measures are implemented. primary among such considerations are the elimination of blighted ccnditions existing in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area , elimination of seismic deficiencies , and the project ' s fu;,therance of the Downtown Specific.: Flan and Local C( 3stal Plan ' s objectives of increasing access to coastal amenities and revitalising the Downtown area . Another important consideration is the significant amount of revenue that will result to the City and the Redevelopment Agency from the project , which revenues can be used t^, improve service levels , construct capital facilities , provide additional affordable: housing , mad for other important peblic purposes . The final EIR identifies two unavoidable adverse environmental Impacts (see Section 6 . 1 in the EIR Unavoidable Significant Adverse impacts) . 'these are : 11 Increased light from new sources associated with the project . 2. Project-specific and cumulative impacts to they historical context, physical and architectural resources, proposed Hain gtteet Historic District, onsirt:e historic re4sources, and ousulativee impacts to historic resources within the community Soft of thMse effects are lessened by the mitigation measures $89gexted 3n the 219, which measures will be required and incorporkted Into the project. The reeasors the City has determined tk4t the rer OWng effects of each impact are acceptable, given Offsetting project bernefits, are discussed below. cs L,nbt Associates kith the__- Th :-ojeCt will increase the amount of light generated on this site relative to that which currently exists . New light sources are srasooist*d with new commercial structures , street lighting, and tt6ffic lighting, which will be visible from adjacent areas and Contribute to general night skit illumination . Such lighting will be visible due to the relative height of the buildings (maximum three stories) in relation to surrounding uses , particularly those to the north and want . Howsv►*r, the perceived impact of this project will decrease over time because as other major developments o.:c:ur, this project will reptosent lose of the total light source . The adjacent multi-story retail-pa+king structure, and the nearby Fier Pavillion project , for eea►mple, will detract from the perreived impact of this site . Additionally, are increase in light may have beneficial effects , such as added safety for motorists and pedestrians . The FIR identifies mitigation measures to lessen the impacts of liv_htai.,J, which have been incorporated into the conditions of approval . Thes .r include F shielding and screening of light sources ; in conformance with the Downtown Design Guidelines . lv n the c- G e many public benefits of the project as referen,.ed above, the City finds that the incremental increse in light associated with the project is acceptable . 2 . KigtgXJC At worst case, the project will include the demolition of all structures on the site, including 15 historic structures . The loss of these str-�­..t:ures will have a significant adverse impact on the potential Downtown Historic Distric, on-site physical and architectural resources associated with the City` s history, and the cumulative stock of historic structures within the City. The EIR has identified mitigation measures that vd.11 help lessee these impacts, including complete documentation of Lhe site to be maintained for public review, and a program to ensure that construction vibration impacts do not affect offsite historic structures . The No project alternative identified in the EIR is expected to have loss Impact on historic structures than the iprcpased project , hwrever this alternative may not as effectively fulfill the important project objectives of revitalizing the Main Street comercial corridor, enhancing the street scene downtown, and *nCOUraging pedmatrien traffic. Likewise, alternatives identified In the Bilk than would prohibit demolition of existing structures mould has* 1e55 impact on historic resources, but would not provide for rejuvination of commercial udea along this block to the same extent an the project . These alternatives would not provide for as 4 rY yT, A' I! ,�err,., I• �.( q M, $,�, n� ,a Ir�,15+M wl , prk �Ir y' kit . J l $1&* edwate footage for each property owner as the proj*ct, nor Y ptovide for higher rents accruing to now buildings, as old the 1proposed project . Additionally, the alternatives outlined XIII would entail many of the same environmental effects as ,., ��rst•� �sa� t . n the ah-vet considerations# the City t inds that the public *fito of the project outweigh the impactor on historic resources s in! after mitigation. These benefits include provision of hi�db quality mixed use development along the vitml commercial core dawwr,town and enhancement of the street scene in accordance with, the V*Mtown 00519ra duidelines, both of which will contribute to the r r*JUVinstton of Downtown. The project will also implement the Vihitas- nerving objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan and Local atr l Program, and will ensure the elimination of seismic. deficiencies . r, :r yy IBC Sri,!. 4' 1M�}' I ,4 VA r � Z(H19IT B RHVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 30. 89-4 STATMMpT OF OVSRit 1 D I RO Cats S 1 DERAT I ON S I I The final Environmental impact Report No . 89-4 for the proposed construction of a maximum of 70, 726 square feet of mixed use development identifies certain unavoidable significant adverse onwf romiaental effects . CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 requires the 64Qision-nmaiker (Planning Commission) to ha lsoce the benefits of a tdposed project against unavoidable environmental risks in 84t4rsining whether the project should be approved. If the H decision-asker concludes that the ban,%f i.ts of the project outweigh Lhe unavoidable adverse environmental sffecra , the effects may be considered acceptable. Here, the City of Huntina}on Beach does find that the be:iefita flowing to the City and its r4raidents t ruin the project outw* igh the significant adverse environmental effects which remain after the project ' s mitigate on measurea are implemented . Primary among such considerations are the elimination of blighted conditionsexisting in the Main-tier Redevelopment Project Area , elimination 'if ueismic def:icirencien, and the prof ect ' s furtherance of the Dowlntoorn Specific: Plan and Local Coastal Alan' s objectives of increasing access to coastal amenities and revitalizing the Downtown area . Another tmportan� consideration is the significant amount of revenue that will result to the City and the Redevelopment Agency from the project , which revenues cAn be used to improve service levels , coastrvct capital .facilities , provide additional affordable houcing, and for other importaut public purposes . The final SIR identifies two unavoidable adverse environmental impacts (see Section 6 . 3 in the E1R - Unavoidable Significant ► Mverse Impacts) . These are: 1. Increasead light from new sources associated with the project . 2 , Ptojaect-specific and cumulative impacts to the historical context, physical and arch.1tectural resources, proposed Main Street Historic District, onsite historic resources, and CUMIStive impacts to historic resources within the community in general . $MO of th*f* effects are lessened by the mitigation measures o'geet9d in the 21ft, which measures will be required and incorporated into tho project . The reasons the City has determined thot the ra"#eing effoots of each impsct are acceptable, divan �►lftaettinf project benefits, are diacuBsed below. is `lp Llight knapplSted_.3gith tha proms The project Will ineresbe the amount of light generated on this site ` relative to that which currently exists . Now light sources are aNgoclated with now coaerercial st:ructurest street lighting, and t.spffle lighting, which will be visible from adjacent areas bad contribute to general night sky i1biminst.ion. Sucr lighting will be visible due to rho relative height of the buildings (maximum three Stott**) in relation to surrounding uses. particularly those to the notth and wont . Howevege the perceived impact of tris project will decrease over tiaw because as other major developments occur , this project will, represent less of the total light sourie . The adjacent multi-story ratail-parking structure, and the nearby peer Favillion pxojewt , for "sempie, will detract from the perceived impact of this site. Additionally, NO inczeassr in light MAY have beneficial affects , such as added safety for motorists and pedestrians . The 8IR identifies mitigation measures to lessen the impacts of lighting , which ha•.'e been incorporated into the conditions of approval . '.chase include shielding and screening of li.1ht sources , in rontotmenc:e vvi Lh the Downtown Design Guidelines ., Givan the wdny public benefits of the project as referene-ecl above , the C+.ty finds that the incremertW increse in light associated with the project is acceptable . . 2 --iUKt xic- .imucts At worst case, the project will include the demolition of all structures on the site, including 15 historic structures . Thi. lose of these structures will have-, a sianf f_=icant adverse impac- cn the potential Downtown Historic Distric, on-site physical and architectural resources associated with the City' s history , and the cumulative stack of historic structures within the City. The SIR has identified mitigation measures that will helrb lessen these impoots, including complete documentation of the site t* he mWintai9ked for public reviews, and a. program to ensure that conmtruQL&1 a vibration impacts do riot* affect offsite historic structures . The eo Project alternative identificd in the EIH is expected to have 10e0 impact on historic strictures than the proposed project , however this alternative may not as effectively fulfill the ietportsat projevt objectives of revitalizing the Main Street ealmroial corrifor, enhancing the street scene downtown, 1!ad encouraging pedestrian traffic. Likewise, a:teknativets identified in the 21R that would prohibit demolition of existing structures would have leas 109eot: on historic resources, but would not provide for ref uvbnation of Commsrciel uses along this block f-.o the same extent as the Project . These alternatives would not, *provide for as Y y y MO fl are foot #0 for SOO property owner as the VC0 00t, not provide for higher rats accruing to ems+ bul'idinos , as Additionallr, tho alternstives outlined a would entail m� . ny of the same onrrironsa.rital effects as project. .' p Upoll the above considerationno the City finds that the public t `Wits of the project outweigh the impacts on historic resources anifto after mitigation. These benefits include provision of high quality mixed use development along the vital commercial core 60fttma and enhancement of the streft scene in accordance with the INwntowh Design Ouidelines, both of which will contribute to thr, tajuvinstion of Downtown. The projoct will also implement the .` visitor-serving objectives of the Downtown Specific gran and Local Coastal Program, and will ensure the elimination of v4ismic ' d�b�icisat�ies . 1 i •y T• I L •1, y 'I 1 M�h,r ati I ray J i '" ,gat i OA ! , 14 C 4 ' cam cm err .7 ` ► ,3` ACTS FOUND TO BE INSIGNMCANTv EFFECTS FOUND TO HE ?0 &ML OF WSIGNIIarICANCE, AND SIGNIFICANT ENVTROI'JWNTAL CAMM W AVOIDED IF THE 'PROD PROJECT Ia F I #03 WrM RESPECT TO SAID EFFECTS, AND STATEMENT OF ' , " • RF.CIF. ALL WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED O W NTAL IMPACT REPORT, CONDITIONAL USE y: MMMT PERMT, DEMONSTRATION BLOCK ATE OF MAN STREET), HUN fINGTON EEACH, CALIFORNIA the Oalit `.ia ntrl Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA GuldeEnes ` pr6aau#Saa d p unmet thereto provide: "IVY I "I appta car can out * project for which an EIR has been k %WWWWt le a+atiflea one or nwe sigrdficant environmental effects of the prodap OW00 t public ASOM makers one or more writt+art #'fndit� for each of► tit ► fir eu ! ,off" aomameW by a brief explanatke of the rationale for TM svAisible fladirgs are: i. des or alteratloers have been required In, cw ijacarperated into, the veldt or substantiall lessen the significant envaotnmental drect as klentifierd in the Final WK. Hereafter refereed to as Finding 1. 20 as i air alt�eratiarn s within the responsibility and jurisdiction of #w00wr WIC mMM and wt the agency mttk g she finelmg. Such changers otbr agency or can and should be adapted by such adi r 400fty. a iafter ref d to as Ftrrtltng 2. S. S lfic etc, social, or othw coadde rations main Infeasible the , t#gatina t6-Araw at project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. , atti •t,efe:'A led to as Finding S. The City of kiuntingt+crta Beach is oo idering approval of Cacx litional Use Permit No. $a-1 and Coons] Development Permit No. $i-1. Bec$use the p mposed actions constitute a project ur-6w do CEQA Guidelines, the City of Huntington Beach has prepared an Enviror ttal Idupact Report (MR). This EAR has Identified certain significant effects which mry occur as a ra wlt of the project, or on a cumulative basis in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. Further, the City destres to approve this project and, after determining that the EIR Is complete and has been mprre0 in a with CEQA and the Guidelines, the findings set forth her•tin are p�T ! �Y!! � �4��� ' 11+Y 'Y��/� �� �'9' 11 a e\ �„ r•' �rr^�I �y n `,` r ', �, � rt 0 � y ! ! �h 1•y t�w , 1 r ad ( ,� 1: e„ w *r. r vr( *..., ♦ p . F I y+^£'� n.Y �I rV 'Y f,p, vA �'q'6 i le• v �� .� ., �Y4� ���Mr w'�� 1 � ,MRr�.J.k '�' +r'�. rw •t'.'iP�"Yb �1,! ilyK'. ,P' •.,� !"�' 4�w•.5.�, .V /' MINI• 1�,�, .T an 10tw $v* to ant!! tyre effects Of the w,R�.�,�,�� " #�• r" par ti�l�y ftc�rrnt. tooev whist w A �., irt tlar�ally, land Impacts and mat in ErMranmental Impact Deport No. 1 TT Hutson Health Disk of Upast to Populatim ' 4 •F , aeration Aaathatia t mated Traffic Utilities Earth/Liquefaction, Tsunamis r "I• v r. r, figg: Il �++ E Ot 6 I,St ,, "'�'',y y 'i •w( i r•1 ^ • � Al v rr •.f . ^, 1Y1h1' ��'�.J ', , a+� hK� , ISI ., �V ?I'�Y+ ,S•• yyh(I+f I fr T I ,t v I ', r, 1' + .,. ,-�, r I�,Ilk 1 ,I , , !,i' w, Y yP � • y' 1YH�J F t , • ! ` ` . r r h1 rY InK .i x +,1'/ t'` MrI»✓hyr ..,r y, IF' � { -,i'I�L�(1MM'+4/��Hl�/ '4 N$'. Wl�dd`F3,1t},YIh ,+,/srn l,,r^i} J�A .,,rnW,+cur ��1hMl„V b r^'9ii ,ynly' If '7,fr,, Y the t may be ino mistesnt with the downtown area as a i-ad plow for tlrs project site have not been prepared and 44 : b substantially d to the extent eas b e by f i l virtue of ` I1 lion mks identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report " d the'pMrot: r RoviOW so$" dwil review and approve all proposed extoirior 'M bdUMAS 81twatfon/additions rehabilitation,, or facade ! szr1w ,to apprronral of butU ft permits. j ►�",I�'` 1' d t! a VW *ia11 be 2"Itted to the DoWO Review Board and/or 4 Il wtn►or►t by each pn)perty owner prior to eppiwal of building to. IM locafti end of all suns shalt cWarm to the provisions of the X*sWh Ordhowu Code and be exav&tent with the standards listed in 1� grr Guk�linea. 1�,1114ghting and landscaping materiels Y yi b cotaiwent with the Vddenina. 4d," Tb*:�� 1. ourap and/or spon= a planned site program on bout aides of i -; . This pralpram shall include possible sign amortization, City funded #I of eaini� sls�fand City funded purchase and mounting of new :igm. I:. r �-T.be C7XIS all impletmt oaosistency of similar hardscape and landscape on both 5tseet. T Is a potential for the ambiteectural style of the propooe i project to be incompatible with relatod PrOJWU in tW future downtown area. Ei FitKtt� Y . . - . . .• . • r 4 ' ��� 4,(IOp, 1 Y r•r+' 1 l• IIITTT��� woo •"�.,•+�,,f.,Pc,,: fir,. tit+ ;."� , �i%vos,0. "', kilm 80biftentially 1l iiisr d to the extent fusible by Virtu of &* till~rd in the Final Eswirmsaental Impact 1t*Wt *ett q d ftH smum Oat A a6ftemn Waft 04 pr4dect Offqtom idn Ouldelines and also inoatpmte 'h t�#tativo of the Mimic period of the etructura under review prior 1 �btdlt#h#g pat Its. . Vhm 9hali be submitted to the Design Review D;oar+d and/or is�'10 ,1' by*sob prop"owner prior to approwaI of building � its. Thar la4ette and type-of all sips shall conform to the provisions of the iron Dow*Clyr Onance Cc de and be consistent with the standards listed in psi 3 of the Dorntown Desips Guidelines. All lighting and Iandscaping materials dog go be o onshunt with the gWdelines. r"u age and/or siaaeaac a planned sign prWats on both sides of Noft fit. ?his propram shall Include possible sign amortization, City funded rei val of existing sips, and City funded purchase and mmmting of new sign. 4. The City shall implement comistency of dmilair hardscApe and landscape on both Ntidee of Main Street. MAMRMURCES Itaplementa tioa of tlm project may alter existing toils conditions through potential ocotruct aWwadim activities. Facts of rk" The tlgnific wt effect has been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of the f'ollawtg mitiptioia measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact R"rt and IrAxwporeW into the project-, 1. For now wmtrwtion, a detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Sils engineer prim to the: IsstiLnce of grading permits. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed remmmendations reprding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations, retaining walls, streets and utilities. ��rM :•'I 1 r,K �� 4' � ','�,r �� 4Yi,� � v,ti 1y.Q' R ` �4 '.. �}.*' �V•.,J r�rl � �^'r� ��t � ����,•,Rr'�! �r�t PIN "1 y j� J� J 1 'R,11 J`��•�� wrl���i� '���� ^���� F •,'' { y' � J�, r ! r i• `�h •t W '�y ',�, �'l � N.r.1 }�r it. k'v 4,4, r WOil. r "' � � �JJr M'e"i 1'••-4'�5��: i��+46M�T.u4 {ll�laT YY4�TMTMTM1. , ;rl Tr uy,lr�il i.. o.r�...r� 'mot'. . .��.•irt+�b'�Y:. ! fj�� 1•y ,j,P M MIME a; ry ted to at 40' gyp, pnee,,at aa). A plan for rftw aprrruatRN am bdt%l DhVeW of (�h3, �t �' �► bar tl' A5t`'''',t; �''.' lc}. '.S, Y,,�,'r, ", 'iar ,;�".spa 'F'�^ • "' , A T 1 T Aig IS the follawl 01t ti .War." IWO In•`' 2. 0' •� f�;��xfi��w!;� '„1�-nr,:'!'�MJ i�l�i,,��"''D�'" .';.rR<t w''i.,�',d-.�,',d,; _ �r ' tugi ht ett soils studies caMucted for new comtruction mitigating will bs rooAred to be: Incopcvated into the project. These measures my t llraitetd tos lattf*M "ia srad��. clef faundatian*� rub�ains. ni 1Y { F p rti Wins u�r `` # M SSISmtaally active area which requires building conformance! wi•tn 'n' {•PJr r Ftndift 1 t effect ho been 01ftlentially lessened to the extent foasiblet by virtue of r mist"Oft ftem drN Watifted in the Pinal Environmental ltisbw Rnxwt '`'` giplrgtd #dam►the Wit. An proJect icants shalt b! r %&od to complete seismic des of eudst with Cityof H'un t rn Reach Municipal Code Chapter �� , •. l7.lb. Urea I" DomAttbn of all artsite histarle buildings will eliminate the extsting ties the block provk& s to the recorded history of the City of Huntington Beach. fig Fib Z F,t--*u to 50=t rjLFJWJnw The s fleet effect has beta substantially lmened to the extent feasible by virtue of the following mitiption measuo identfsleed In the Final Znvironmental Impact Report wW lncorpmud into Cleo profit: 1 4.r�k'n• �,, 1 L jK ^' to of dowlitipo pet Its fcw structures witW the project area Ilpt Fifth S#Wt)o the pnapsrty/bufldl owner shA11 offer his/her dtmtt to theCity of 7funtb*M Beach Hie rival Jammtd pr#fee) for the WPM of relocating the structure on 'S'r'f,°'jb; '. i. '�;iI%•r.' MVWW 00101wow t andf\/r � � osr � ,ig�ficut �M�tectl L sllM' atop, uat Incur MY is asiactated with moving or ,,k:• *&uowra or nmm=ent. The new owner and/or a nm-profit wntbw ft M cost of rokming the structure or monument. The p MV*mnwnt period will not exceed 43 days from the We of applications for demolition. , bigs va documentation of the project site, an is currently exists, shall be prior to the imuenoe of any building, grading, and/or demolition permits. O ttatim shall be in acccm dance with stansdards established by the Ifiltorical American Buildings Survey/Historical American Engineering Records (FULSIMARIO., The report stall be archivally maintained with provisions for public .' stOW6 The oasts associated with preparation and maintenance of sire �Mt shell be the responsibility of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment j 3. Prior to the approval or issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building permits, all facets of the pm*t related to historic preservation shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. I 1 s ltupldmidtaMan of the proposed project may adversely impact the structural stability of yr Mare structures. F The [leant t bas been substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtue of tlre`f� +!mee mitigaton meamras identified in the Final Rnvirarrnental Impact Report OW foomplamgte+d laic the projtt 1. Prior to the issuance of any demolition permits an adequate monitoring an&or bam try prrap m shall be established between the City Redevelopment Agency and pr'aparty owners to enore shot demolition and construction vibration Impacts do not adversely affect offette structures. LIGHT AND GLARE S M113ant Effect 92 Implementation of the proposed project may increase the amount of glare in the area. JSSlY R 1,J+ Y PSi'•` ° '� {NyT'1 ;• ,7, i M I X A r 4 ,;. a� fir'. G �� -y 'A+) A � • )' 1 , �A' r, M a 'i{' „ .1fr Juf.yy� IM,+' T')� '1, �' }o_�}Y �1' Y i.,�1 ,• ,i j'` - . ' ,', 1`� �y, ' ?' I '., '. •S� �1;.` ; ..I {i,7ll l,,�ry} a rJ,J` dam a, i ,f' d Y;y�� •�t�'° i.4'� Ql+�N�.��fl ;'� r .,�r .'° � ` ��w�j� 1',- 'K a,ti','•tM t1, J ! C" ° rorj 1st •+ ,7 y 4 1 1 t.r TQ 1 •;,erl i W,p' '1' , ,+«rr diYl)r ! 'a �ttally Dar to the extent l asil�ls► by vi�-tue of !► ,tiNsrda the Final EayiMmtntalaspMct �tert 14A is eluded, hi sodium vipar la>npa or similar enery ` be v" All ou ltplzting doll be directed to provent nowt praper.105 arK! 011a11 be noted on the site, plan and Mot tq ttm 1puance of luildit hermits, a detailed lighting plan shall be approved -t tti tt nt of Comtaunity Davelopmrtnt. The Ian shall be c�osasistent with p D nWvm lighting plan and liShting standards in the Dmntown Dian 1 'WI f 1 r li j' t7 fill' ' i 1 + .bW%dM of the site will result in a total prqject demaWshortaae of 539 . ' 'h#► , t•, rea Aboad limed to the extent feasible by vhlw of _ ; ' tka IVA acts l trnpact ttsp►oct 1 l t �k: ."l deweloproont,pro is within Districts 3 and So shall bO Ot~raadto to rate rnm lmum extort fr.,estible. The balance of tay required diall to pievled in a public porldog facility within walkinS distance not to e 3Sil feet. Time offsite pwthW rAom shall be in place prior to the i ar of a c ardfIcate of oCc nor for the new development. 2. Pages teaaentS fur nan Mformitg uses or structures may be met by payment of art W fee for prVAdttrg Parking in parking facility. Said fee may be paid in two tnstallments. The first installment in an amount established by City Council Dolutlon 1OV eadt parking srsc a shall be paid pwiar to the lejuance of building permits or of a canit'icete of occ uparry, whichever comes first. The second irsstrllment in an amomit osu4blistW by City Cauacil Resolution for each parking space shall be paid at the time City *ndlr r parking autbority or District constructs a peftiox rtWture in ;he Downtown area. A survey in a sum equal to the eeoond inst:llowt "'I be flied with the City at the time the first installment it paid MWA ` — 5 fir, ��r7 ' ' -i ,• v • r ,ku 7i + i11j , 1 l 711 y M Ty ` •, ; ylL nil r4 �� , ,i s P + 1 1• IZs� Mti a p }�. Y, , Ap 9 1lbe e• fw p a for ft e t re�uare tootap in the Famn d14U be pa�p�rlatr to Iunnc+r o bullfts pwmitaor ce a !'hrrto The number of opco to be IJ �T, haiownsr and the � r f e r eta be verified as part of ,1µ •'f :F,:1y;' +tutl 8111C NNOM't aw VMJW application. 4. *WSW s pay !u-�lleu rkint fso for aclditima1 aqurre footage to for the added VMS "RD d�meml. Feea shall be paid prior to issuance of b ite'�ae' artifloato of oocupancy, whichever comas first. The offelte � yrlix be in place prior to the final approval of building permits for '�� • t �'�'ih' 1Miht. F iw tWo parlda4g Ahmagos amount to 1,$3S parking, "cam under the City code, and served use parking. R 1 F+ effect has bm substantially lessened to the extent feasible by virtua of mitlPtSM measarryee identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report raid i—ted istta► that pr+ Act: P'a iah for new cotiksociol dwelopmernt project within Districts 3 and Sa shall be atislte ttr this m i adeuum extent towtble. The balance of any required � shall be provided In a public parking facility within walkin distance not to { 350 teat These offatlte parking spaces shall be in place prior to the iwhowe of a owificate of occupancy for the new development. As p"wo widdn the parking district, coatprised of Downtown S*ific Plan 3 sM'So* t+e mt development approval, they shall contribute their *QZ~ towards reducing the cumulative perking demand deficiency. Fees `prir to#maMM of building pes'raIts or certificate of occupant►, w�' oe ari fit. The offsite parking space shall be in place prior to the manes of Owtificatt of ocicupancy for the new development. ' s �- � �J•JI! �f r w+�'�Y�%'��/ ,"v + 1�� '/� � "4y +','' i 4��'���"���'�'1��•+�� � i i •'iy a J�1' '��Ir, •ql ,.+,� n• vr• 00 S + •� M + •f+l ,9i JY `'Y �� �phF ^ll v t, � 1, gI 'i S� 1 'R; I� � ,.d' 1 !1 Y its. •,4Y 1 Y+ r 1 v, ,�, ri 1 CMsa, +- ' yfrl` jr, • �� j '� ,;;J�, �� r ` `p I�' ,ITv � Jllr �+ < F');v vi:,. n'�{�S ,I�N'•- ' ""i�+" � I p 'w 11 .0�y � 1 I. � I ,Y, � � k FWy y + Y►� % A 1�#,'• '"' 'C �+r 4''.s!„n. '' ran" 1, ��' .• I'� ' h' ''�',7, l• � }, • 1' !�� i 11�.1.M� r . � i N K I 1 J..Y �Y 1 rF). 41r„V �i - rl.,}aLu ,/ • ,.J-.f a. r� ,'�� ;1 is•' :'•1' •��1 Y� (+ ',i err •1 ���4�:aS .a ;�.'';i •'r't'�'d.�','r . 1 J "�e^•' ;fin,+,,. !�'r1•�'� �'di.. .; ��: _ � , 0MVIon, sattins, feeling, and aweoeiation) in the tr WPAWW r AA ire will be eliminated with the demolition of ontite historic ��•• + MIS W1 I IN 1 T :0 MOM" which can mitigate the impact to the integrity of mite historic * it:00 struc we demolialmA. ��•yp ', 1'}^rl.V:����t�j�pYe'}(�'� ,,�rr,}•,1.:�r • •f�,�rn � � An, t t in dw deMQHtion of Mne build which were identified to be Poo tamwms to the Citg►'w hiatawry. , I ��'rj:'t,�` •;p�Y"••,'K,.lr..('11"�Ik�.!! �fij�1'Fl+r'V'�'�' � •• . S ; '�.•�•:�` I. .,Ji•�•'� r�l.`�y ,j'�+,�i1�f1 M•:�S•Ilr�r'.h�t���nr•I;+�,�. „I'. •,�i' . , .10MOMPAW which can mitigate tk* impact to important phyriesl resources if 40 1 as demolished. AM sum 93 The Prb)ect =Y resWt in the demolition Of four architecturally significant buildings. EMU Finditt 3 r PIN ''� y�r�y!V �, � w dt r�r 'r )q,.,. _ •1 � '� .N 1� ��,�,�`yr /r rra r t !a , 1 •� I. r 1 - rt ' .yrN6 t n Wa.fil..•n '4:M1 �.M.�..ti Div�r,.i. .! �� 4+ S.I i� . t ,f rSei7f �a "i rya - ' to tar hitectwally oi�a nmt , lift / •"+:#�:'''. (•"r 1':•�,wire i�:' „I r s �'C 5 1: OWN mar 00= due to the low of historic building te�rity of the downtown area. 44 06. dw Wltbmte ft impact to the ability to obtain historic Mom RWIF wi w tie40, �tru+c desatilishetl. ,�I�Mv,rr r Q t � • tho P-01VOsed Wqjwt may recap in the elimination of onsite historic resources. RON 'r ► r 9. *bWb ca mitigate the impact of elijbination of owite historic 'e dethoiii�ed �f1 y The pro,�rct will hwementally contribute to the reductions of hist.aaric structures In tbs f0 of Huntfttcn CIL riding Finding 3 t�► 91OJ ' 104��� lr,l' 1',1�1 '' �'`° , Iv ,MCA •�v ..,�14 flj I`,`. v �lv� "•vt� .��-' y -.'t '.�„�' .�1IA`[[)) �"+� ,/ I •;�� A r v�. I', '•'�', ".e.w �M� !'' aw' � k •t•' al � y:Z ' ��''��' �r {.vv r,'�,� _ a p lY � t i •'I''^` S Yr I�j , 1 ,,' � .a ,' 'M1�'�'� iK�yi' .� �'• i'�ari" ,: � I stiff � . ,„�f�,i,ta.tti'•:C y . jA ] �I�,�' +jet •� M1 ', Fb� , lowde a!twu rof in the City 17 . rr l� ap trlbu tea the r*&W lM at historic Struatu on S R 1 r ' Wltich CAR mitigate the reductlon of hfgtWtc structures on a if tbre • ' tiu are demolished. . t W7 r ft downtown jonn 3. 1.:. , 1 4d to the &xtent feaible by virture of the follow u g 1A-0 p Pb&1 EWArbmeftal hopM Report &d kwmVented COO mitsur Di�r�s ` its plan *brit be sad = 1► inpn3t. T1W plan shall be cmfi tent with 1` PWn aW 1 t t r'de in , tasWa the�i barn roam DeWSn r tko wenum th*t can #Wly mitigate the cumulative incre&W . WIT-161 It the ptq is approved. M wIL k 711tu , ��4�� e:• �•;"��.��,i 1, '.!',.. ,'P 44 T, '. }4 :ryh' .?ri!� �"' r�' 1 ,4d • A • t+p...�. rY� 7 d .-AMOVAtritim Block The PrOJW r,t ' t ►le►rr tl a mew of ar#kw 1rrp rrrra hu bewn pad and awlylted in a masumn so as to at11*t public involvement in the planning and CRQA procem,. ' 1. I ermana ninth Owprogftm undRr which the Notiow of raw we i t dt 1"t l� R wow ' ' S. Tho.140pt 1d a and StamlaYd City Policies and Rw*drements have been 1. I a p►W of the pin t. � -qAW of the project alternatives. The a1te^natlrras pia*t propmeal. The rationale for rejeatke of each f' Y' �i •.L.'':+,t, 'r t. ,l plttivt that CUP No. 89 .1 and CDP No. 89-1 would ow be:' t e r, +nwnare wrauld not be allowed to Wre C detdoltsh hdstarlc sa wwttartae. The al ternative would ., •+ "�exi�ti tbu�turei► and th,e dlatributioNn of fw�ds to sir tr for fad I provements subject to their compliance with toodements. %%* implementation of then No ject would either rennaln in their existing condItIoul, be ! trtt r;fir prcp"owrm or be impmved as part of the Facade Grant ' r f qr other coinake'ratlwra taalce infeasible the � 'a> ► + ' tl 'in the Rul EIR and described above in that: ► r .. attitv+e dM not as effectivaly itgpldment Important Wals of i tliiith dal Plats, the r1owntovm ecific Plan, or the Downtown . The" WU& ealu ncement of the vitality of Main Street as a atM, Mpgtr 11 between ' Main Street and tits Pier, 0,. costal r , eite4cVve blaWlaz of historic mid iAM c1 ►I equaland ratlenal use of lanai for offective retail and offio sprees. SiVificant rffitcta of the pnefOMA project are Acceptable whey. balanceO against facts set faith in dw Statement Of OvenlWn a Considerations and stated above, and are more a0c)eptable than trace anticipated fma the No Poject Alternative. � ,-�► '��'/1�+'.' ` '• +'fie t � � �,r i 1� +St',• 1 V'�'ry �t �.It• i r •' ` .A' ' . t.. ,l•I � �r , yr. '��f, •":�a4 S 1 Ain LnBXAMM i4 Mid {tt /�1t�1 that aitiarll �'Gota�� COIII�I be a r a tOftt demolishins aby' of then Ox1aft hls OU31 strn+ctUM •iVll*`�V as,1�1`xt'f V. 7 I 7�hA1r1 �tV b',r,,,,, , IN L. ;F »: emomic, a vial or other molderations make infeasible the project's Footage Altamtive identified In the Final EIR vW Th e . lit# Alto-astive does not as effectively Implement important goals , 1 Rtaab Gerral Flan, do Downtown Specific Plan, or the '13 rn'� GtddeJUm. These include efficient use of land for retail and •'*as tilled tar In the Downtown Spwific Plan District S, and effective of hlatorlc and Mediterranean architecture. w t effem, of t0 OWWivd PmJwt are acceptable *ban balanced apirut facts Ow Statement of Ovaonik tip Qwdderatlae� and stated above, and are! Enure 1 t1. t fnticipated from the No Demolition/Increared Square Footage r A1rritivea. ThW �1. 1 1 � A tine aWWW t►'it all p _WWILies ah*aty developed on the. pm*t bla:k would � bo alk ed to be M%1ab:lltated without acquiring additional square footage. The five � .. . re arteU rso+ul�1 be alloweJ to develop at a 1.0 FAR, a ratio apprvximating x°?_ aedbtJiftkpment vithin the bkwk. ptaft$ -! i#{o ebMoattev iWal, w other oonxldt:atiom make infeasible the pro t -s Reduced Intenslty/lnfill Alte rmtive identified in the Final SIR and descried i !th tbat: The Red d bt Ity/fnflll Alternative does not as effectively Implement igsOdr"tlolt pals 6f the Hmn3ington Beach Central Plan, or the Downtown Specific Plan Rid tatojelty does not p vvide for as effective uses of hvallable; land for retail and office use, greasing the effectivoneas of Main Stu_:et an a vital c.onnmeercial scree. Signi icant effects of the prefe med project are acceptable when balanced against facts act forth in the Statement of{overriding Considerations ami stated above, and are mare acceWaMe than thm anticipated from the RedpAced Intentityllnfill Alternative. (S63Od) dF r " 1 Xrt"TA $ME ENVfiROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89-4 'The ahmages to Draft Environmental Impact report No . 89-4 are noted WJowrli' The changes do not affect the overall conc;luslona of XISTi,ib Ato tal Impact Report No . 89-4 . or �rs h tobould be amende0 to stead, �Tlie vcieirl f a�r 207 Mal ' . arh ib i• one and : ° '� ti i'' 2 5 and 22S Maid which Are two story. " first`,pa::%grsph nhould be *mended to read, *The entire s 'p#rred or occupied by structures* with the exception of Ve 4oto rehi.cb are unpaved dirt , and two lots which are half W V%WA dirt•; each. 8evonth paragraph should be amended to read, "Thee City tinot6d Heath Historic Resourees Survey Report has given tha �)''e)Ibe,rt- teatherman Building a 8/1** (see Fable D) ranking. " » , �Anth paragraph should be amended to reea&�, "Original .' VOticsI paneled transoms ruse above the store windows and door . " fourth pMragsrsph should iuee amended to read, "The building in currently a religious meeting hall . " first paragraph shoo ` be amended to read, "The bq lding is the oldest remaix - .' structure on the black. " Zono U, second paragraph should be amended to read, *The j building is significant as an example of a California Mouse built western false front structure. " - The followinq tote should be added to a IZP Table B= 1pp iM C; an , third paragraph: &to fav;;ages/parking requirements listed are a proximations of the e*isting square footages/requirements WItbite the 0620nostration Block. These figures are not ,to be Used to calculate the amount of space to be grandf athered in as part of the City'a pacade Grant Program. � - 11itigatioa Kousure No. 1 of the parking Section,. MagjL,..$2, should bo changqod too Y+ Th;a City of Huntington Seacri shall be r6sponsible for in-lieu foes to cover parking 'spaces required for the westing square footages in th" Demensttation Block. Foos shall be paid prior to the Issuance of building permits or a Cortiffcate of Occupancy, whichever coshes first . The number of spaces to be gran4tartheered must be agreed upon by both the property owner and Redevelopment Agency and existing square footages should be verified as part of the architectural plans accompanying any project applications . to.'�-r' ' I 1,JI I WO Sam i 1 �► laggL.,,AIL Fable' 1) should be amended to show 214 Fi f th St rest. as Vacant in the "bsti•sting" column. first paragraph should be amended to read, "These 4 arcels include 225 Main Street , 206 Fifth Street , 219 main $treat, 2112 Fifth Street, and 214 Fifth Street . * itthe following statement should be added under 205 Mein tso _ "New issp4goti.on indicates the building on this alto is :i *i0ohr constructions and Is therefore unlikely to be the originel building . Despite this ,, it da�ea date before the 1933 earthquake because it shows evidence of post earthquake damage renovation* * 5 �W `.. Pago , eighth paragraph* the following should be bided: "The bur art was deal nod in the style of Irving Gill but ezteneive library research s unable to connect it directly v4ith him. An eari3r City resident has recently stated that, the owner, Frank ,. burkbart, designed the structure. Despite the lack of direct reletionship, this commercial structure is still locally significant because it is the only, one in Huntington beach that .J, reflects Irving Gill ' s Influence. 9 l