Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Conditional use permit 88-34 - Coastal Development Permit 88
Mob L .4K .4 = Lou J iIC�n4„ REQUES FOR y7 Date — February 6 , 1989 %bMilited tey; tVnarabla Mayor and City Coli».:i ' � n hni tteed by: Robert Fr. a,a,.* , Denutu C l.ty .4cl idnistrr t ��. P;Mwed bar: Ed Thompso;i, Insu;:&�ice and r:!?nnxits Manager WJ1.'r P,R OF INSURANCE REQUIRE , JITS PURSUANT TO IREk3OLUTION NO. 5835 AMA 'V9ti �`Z7^Y OUNCIL cenwsta nt with Coerwl Policy? yN Now Volicy or E i Statement of Iwus, Rwommendatier±, Ann"Is, Funding 5oum c. Alter At the Council meeting cf November. 7 , 19880 the Council certified EIR No. 88-4 , and approved Conditional Use Permit No . 88-34 , Coastal Deve?:Jpment Permit Vo . 88-27, Tent `.ive Parcel Map No . 88�-385 to permit: the cor.struction of a parking structure• in the 200 Block (Fast Side) of. Main Street . One of the Historical Resonrce NVAgation Measure, included i.'� :. EIR specifies comprehensive documentation of the projecf- sl 5., llocrua&ntation includes photographs , measured drawings, ei-1. 't historical narratives . Under CEQA, changes i.a.. mitigation _ of a previouffl.y certified EIR require that -;.ne amended doc rrca;::: .: be reciieulated for a period of 30-45 days for publiv- comment At the Council meeting of January 30, 1989, staff p::essantc •' w.- �,:. estimates of approximately $37, 000 from then firm of dears ':sav l l' � and rolyzoidos . This estimate included the measured drawi.-gs and historical nerrative portion of the documentatiooO . At that .• sting , counci i directed staff to obtain additional coat emtimates fo., documentation work. Staff has obtained work estimatas for the measu+?d drawings of the documentation. This work can be scheduled in two phases . The first phase includedw collection of all Meld data such as f .:: ;neA80X'eM9nt5 bred preliminary sketches . The second phase includims rY, the producti sn of the measured drawings from the field data . Each phase will be handled an a separate contract under $10, 000 . The historical narrativen will be produced in-•house. Duey to the reguiremnt for special photographic equipment and documntation expertieet, consultant services have been obtained to fulfill the photography documentation. This PCA addressea only the photographic portion of the documentation requirements. No F IN ► I1� T E Jy'AANN E.ESE' ARCE NSSO IATE H1 i 1 onic. n "qI fili (alll it ;,, ►• .... ;: 0Iq',ill1 NovemOr 2, :988 ?t?"J C u 1, PA Dapartm6nt; of comunity Development: city of, ii ntingron Berth 2000 Main St. 0.3 riuntinston Beech, CA 92648 Attentibni Muth E. Lambert i' Assists►tt, Planner Tatar Mto� Lainbcr t: As requested, we have begun our re tiraluati.on of the Huntington Beach Downtown Historic Resources Survey in the Downtown Priority Area, specifically in the vicinity of the potential Mein Street Historic Bistrfct. We concur with the Judgement of the State Office of ilia•- toric Preservation that sucl, a potential National Register of llietoric Places district dogs exist and that the east lido of the 200 black of Main Street , which would be demolished by the implementation of the proposed project , 13 integral to the existence of the potential dis•- trict . We note that the significance of the di.strlct is largely based on historic.-,al rather then architectural criteria. fhur tnterpretation of the boundaries of the district vary somewhat frvru those proposed by the State in order to encompass adjacent historical resources. With tbasle adjustments, approximately 57 buildings are included within the diaerict , of which 43 (75b) tare considered to be contributing and 14 (259) nor.—contributing to the historic quality of the district . ()f the 57 huildings, 1 is already listed individually on the National 208ister, and at least 3 more appear to be eligible both individually oind an contributors to the district. Spetlfic addresses, evaluat•ionF, and boundaries are presented on they attoebed mal, rind lia*ing. It should be ev:)hasizod that these conclusions are preliminary and are hand solely on visual criteria and on the forms (PPR5:'a) completed\ an pest of the 19b6 hi>uturic resources survey. Further research Is required to substantiate tho historic significance of the district and � its components. Nonetheless, it dues appear at thi-i Juncture that a pot6gtiel National Register Historic District of local significance dose exist. Sincerely, Elie Heusenn , 44 • • . christy J a on �lcAtrar , &K irk . r• REQUEST FOR CVTY COUNCIL ACTION AA Date February 61 1989 _ Subirittedto: Honorable Mayor and City Council 1% N ,hmitW by: Robert Franz , Deputy City Adm�..nistrato ° i .fired by: Ed Thompson, Insurance and Benefits Manager subject: WAIVER OF INSLMMCE REQUIREMENTS VU'RSUAMT_5Q_PX=A=Tr NO . 5835 APYRQVRD BY CITY COUNCIL - IL9 Cowistrent with Commit Policv7 14 yes [ ; Now Polivi or Exoeptio 0, _ CITY CL RK Statement of Issue, Recommendation,AkAlyvi:, Fum,%ig Sourtm. Alternative A . mer ts: STATEK!KNT OF ISIStIE: At the Council meeting of Novembar• 7, 1989, the: Council certified UIR No . 88-4 , and approved Conditional Use Permit No . 88-34 , Coastal Development Petmit No . 68--27, Tentative Parcel Map No . 88--385 to p4crmit they constrtetion of a parking structure in the 200 Block (East Side) of Main Street. One of the Historical Resource Mitigntion Measures -.nclud.)d in the SIR specifies comprehenLi.ve documentation of the pzoject site . Documentatie,4 includes photographs, measured drawings , and historical narratives . Unle3r CFQA, changes in mitigation measures of a previously certified EIR require that the amended document be recirculated for a period of 30-45 days for public comment. At the Council meeting of January 30 , 1989 , staff preseiated oork estimates of approximately $37, 000 from the firm of 'deyBretteviIle and Polyzoides . This estimate included the measured drawings and historical narrati.we portion of the documentation . At that meeting, Council directed staff to obthin additional cost estimates for documentation work, Staff has obtained work estimates for the measured drawings portion of the documantati.on . This work uan be scheduled in two phases . The firxt phase includes collection of all field data such as field measurements and preliminary sketches . The second phase includes the production of the measured ;rawings from the field data. Each phase will be handled ae a separate contract under $10 ,000. The Historical narratives will be produced in-house. Dus to the requirement for special photographic equipment and documentation expertise, consultant services beve been obtained to fulfill the photography documentation. This RCA addressee only the photographic.. Port idn_-of..-the , documentation re,uirements . Fursuat+t to ResoLition No. 5835 , the staff. .requerts a waiver of the irI.MrAnCe raquirew&nts for photographic services . 13' htaff recommends the City Co:inci l approve t:ie request for a waiver of the insur&nce requironment pursuant, to Resol.utio.a No. -5335 . Staff '..p requeuti,.ng a waiver of insurenc,e requirement is pursuant to Resolution Vo . 5835, :based on the limited exposure of the Consult+ani. to, pots,,- liability problems and the size of the contract I (Atteehmnt R) . Further, this Consultant possesses automobile liability insurance, and a $100 , 000 busineBs liability insurance policy dt the residence/office of the Consultant . Alc • there are no employees retained by the firm and the Consultant agrees to i.r.detani.ft the City. Consequ6ntly, the City attorney has reviewed this request and along with staff r-acommends that: Council - accept the Consultant ' s insurance and w6ive the insurance requirements pursuant to Resolution 5835 for this project:. ;IRS Sol= Reftvelcpment Agency Funda, aoneA proceeds Account No. 812645 . Deny t%e request to wcive insurance r•:quiraments . ATrACIRWJM: I I. Ronoautrion No . 5835 MA:RL:gbm i 1q1 r, RCA - 2/6/89 -2- (14 50d) ,E, . J Y 1 , RES01IM.014 NO . 5835 I A RESOLD','J"ON OF THE 167M COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINCTIM BLACH AST;BI ISHTNG CG'! T' ACTORS AND RFR.MIT APPLICANTS INSURANCE AND If`l!)Eni,.ITY R .QUIREMENTS WHEREAS, there are persons and or ganizat icn s performirn services for the City (herein as ''contractors" ) , and permit applicants who are engayed {n various activitfes in the City all of wham subject the City to possible iiahility for damay%- to pro, arty n and injury Y to persons;ersons; and The City desires contractors and permit, ho.LOera to maintain insurance naming the City , its officers , and employees , as sddl.liolnal insureds; and The o' . ty deai;:es to require indemniYUcati.on by contractors and perml' t ,. ,ldazs; NOW, THERSFORE, BE .IT RESOL•VEU by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, that, Lho insurance ocverage and indemnity required of all contractors and permit holders, other than design engi.necring consultants , who are engaged it; vac ious activities in the City which subject the Cite to P-_istble liability, shall be as followa : a.'-- COVERAGE REQUIRED A. Genera! E ability. Combined single limit bodily ' n jury, and property damage including products/,.omplece6 ope;:Ations liability Ine. blanket c;ontractu41 liabi.11ty: Minimum limit•a of one al1jion dollara per aec:ur,rence . if coverage iA pxovided under a fora, which includas a Oes;gnaeed general 499regalte limit, the aggregate Ilni t nitist be no less than •fit. 4%tr,� �� f.a315 40 Owi.c�l tlle i.wj C. 1,71 t:h2 event of' 49gregate COV-Pra(30 , thf! poli,-'}, WJ-11 tindeavc)r LO give thu City' n Or o it I ly k I I CIO.r)10-. io n ot I tZ.-i C-1.a i in s I . Made J-A)11,ci�l; in-(: licit- self i-11sured retentions are acceptaole tiy..)oti approval. Risk Manager . L . WORKERS COMPEN-SATION Workers ` compensati.on and employerof liability in an aMOUnL of not less than $500 , 000 bodily injury by accid-nmt , each acc-identt �500 ,rOOO bodily injury by Oisease each employee , 41 ,000 . 6j0 bodi. 1y injury by, disease , policy limit ,- as approved by the City Attorney . PROPESSIONAL L1A8irj1.V)t INSURANCE AND WAIVERS 1 . Contractors providing professional sevvices to the city shall be required to provide evideince of p�:ofe6sionnl liability insurL�ice in appropriate amounts and coverages as required by individual contract . 2 . Waivers of the pcofessional liability insurance may b� granted in appropriate cases . Contractors desiring a waiver shall submit an application for waiver to the Cit'l - Attorney . The application shall be reviewed and granted or denied by the Claims Settlement Committee . ApplicaLions shall contain the following information : A description of work to he performed . The cost of public liability inSLICance . r. The availability of insurance to consUltant . Tb* claims history of proposed contractor . 7 4 M2- 5835 ' t ii 4 n . ,n y n � » . ERTIrXCATRS OF INSURANCE AND ADVITA'ONAT, INSURED ENECRSEMENTS Evidence o i neurance cover. ayc, an6 �a.t-. it:s required by t.1je City shall be ftirrsi.slied to the City ()ri the "Accord" or similar form . Certificates shall, b,2 approved by the C: ty Attorney prior to r..nmnencpgient of 7,,iy w o r fk or the issuaricci of an,, permit , A separate copy of w-, endorseme ,t; to each contractors liability po.l.-icy naming the city, its officers snd employees an additional ins>>reds shall be provided to the City httorney prior to any payment: to contractor . Endorsements and c:erLi. f. icates shall provide for a 30 clay written notice of cancellation of any coverage to the City . 3 , INDEMNITY Contractors And permit holders shall be required to indemnify t City, ite officers and employees from liability , aC isi.ng from � ' their negligence or willful misconduct . A copy of tLe City 's I-urrent indemnity agreement is attached as Exhibit "A' . The form cf such agreement- may be revised from time to time bf the City Attorney in conformance with state or court decision_ without revision of this resolution . Each invitation to bid � shall include the City Attorney ' s latest approved form art a part of the bid package . 4 . DESIGN ENGINEERX14G CONSULTANTS - EXEMPTION Design and engineerzrig consultants are *xempt from the inaurank,e and indemnity requirements of this resolution . Insurance and indemnity requirements for design and engineering consultants are covered by a separate resolution ti'a COUDCi 1 . i min•'} i _ .. i Ila .. �l f m k ref 4 , S, MACTS ON HISTORIC AAA T�W . to bavo par. Usen &"reseed insufficient depth. Tha Obvious 10*0 o ;'. 1g;; to UstorLc buildin& stock, but perhaps rote lmpvxtont is the lose idM�ati Ltd the socia' Watt of suah a drastic chants. , �y ty, p r ;. W$al, potaaawr •oumant:ation ehould b+a included which addresses the social �'. j•,�aarp�se PImme rater to Section 3.4 "Mi.storicai Resources" which Identifies oLpLf• icant unavoidable adverse proiect-specific and cumulative impacts on the history of the City of Huntington Beach with the implementation of the pro- posed project and .ether past, present, and roasonably foreseeable future proje t:s. Please tar to the reepcoses to comments DPR 2 and 7 . Please also refer 0 Section 3. 3 "Housing/Buaineas Relocation" for a dim- duosion of proiset, pacts associated with the relocation of onxits resi.- detsres surd businesses. CW Section 15131 ihdicatec that "Economic or social information may � (emphasi-s added) in an EIR or may be presented in whatever form the agency dosiros. (a) Economic or aotial effects of a project shall not be treated me significant effects on the environment. . .The focus of the analysia shall be on the physical changes. * The comment is not od avd included .in the final record of the project for review and %�onaideration by appropriate decisio=uaakers. I The pvapvaod -:s'ltig,+stien doe-i not begin to -a dross the severity or the gill nature +oh tho effects on the cultural anvisonaint of t'be ortbinAl city and histotrie district. It raddsrtsswa only the less of the physical struct tiros ad not the cultural Ptnd social loese.2. At a mininna, additional doeuxlen- ;. tation. oral hietory should be prepared. It is not inco•aceiva'31e that mWitio"I social services z:ghat olsso 4a required for the udju+6trAerryt of the area rosidents to such traumatic changes . ;� SSA � Sresp�ss• - +e� Please refer to the rsspotwe to comart HRZ 4. 'j 13 E e , � M .1'+ •r,'� �' 1. I r + '1'� ,+1.d`• 4 1 ,.ICI 4 , L a + r;;a' ' ra' "r• "�, r ;rtia ,ky who 19 I ..", =WNW 1„ 1-l aor«rit =19 P'RiDJF= 04.4 A ternativs alto: Use of an alternative sits for parking at the Lnland -' fie' 99 the histor'ie area would encourage the flow- of foot traffic through the !lain $t. &root, increasing Its economic potential . This EIR does tint a4ft 1es those social, dent' economic beriifitir. + . i Zaspenre, , -lbs Draft AIR identifies that this 41tern&tive may be environmcntally sups- rlgr and should reads, under consideration. am 7 Cc r ;ant *4.3 Preservation of the Clark Hotel: 'Phis structure is considered sligiole f er the 1.%tiona►l Register by the State Office of Historic Preservation and should not be lost without serious consideration. FurthaL attention ration abouLd v be giv*u to the eeo•-oaLe feasibility of a smaller scale retail/comnreercial center which inctludeo the, hotel. HW 7 Ra spans is The Draft Elk concurs that the Clerk Hotel is potentially e;llgiLle: for individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places . The PPres- arvation of thy. Clark Hotel" alternative is identified as being envirorumen- taLly rupeerior to the praposod project ar_d should remain under consider- ati ate, The comment is noted and incl-afled in the final record of the project for � ray ' )v and consideration by approprLare de:cisiormakers , MW d C►Aweat e4.6 Design alteration: The economic feasibility atudy of this alternative, � YrraludinA the noeessaxy restoration of may of the structures, has not been prepared. It should be ordered and review before this alternative is dis- carded. The advantage* of retaining the terse of place expressed in the standing Ntructurss caanat be overemphasized. ' ?; i �eppodre As . notod In the response to corm ant &B 3, the City of Huntington Beach � Daoatrwn baslSn guidelines prearote contemporary Kediterransan architecture to the de.ntoree area, fae&des retention on the project site would not aeet the AJOCtiVes of the City of Huntington Beach Downtown Specific PL-in or 0-VatA p DesiV Cuidellms. The D r'nft SIR ,Mattes that "the sense of F tims NA pie' of onaite buildings as they relate to offaite buildings will be ai►leered. This Is considered an adverse impact." 14 y , •n R 11.1 f Ilk- 1 r' pia ts!•r %a the rospaMe to co went ent HRB 4. *t nt is. noted and incl uden in the final record of tho project for Psrrtor Mal effloidoratioa by spprr priate dsoisiar ors. �' p Cecsert In light of those con*erns we recomend that Flaming Commission mot MAB a dicisier on thin project until Its members have requasted and roaoivod Mora Lo- bWotmation reX&rdL4 tho a1teirnatives ro this project. The tprgttis% dssa►ge to the historic fabric of our city Mould be irroversibla to W611 ec tredie. We billove that a combination of the recommended alter- �" NWiV*s to' tbe project could retain wuch of this resource and still fulfill the goal■ of the Specific Plan for the downtovn. i iiesp�e ' Pleame rotor to the response to comment HkB 4 Tke' commont is noted and irncludod in the final record of the project for rsvlev and cotvi.deration by appropriate dectsioniva'rters . 1lOM'2'I1�0'Y'W BSA= HIMRICAL SOCIETY (HBHS) BM t Domout To often solutions to problems are not solved to their best ability because the correct problem was never i dentif ied in the first plac6. 1 feel that the Draft ZIa 88-4 is inadequate because it does not addrois the correct pzobies. KNO 1 Response The Draft ZIR identifies and evaluates the impacts associated with imple- MDtat1q► of the proposed project . B*th pro j ect-specific and evmn44tiva � ; it ects *Vs addressed snd evaluated, and mitigation is suggested. Sections )A to 3. 8 address "problems" or fapacts associated vith the project. i4s aoted and included in the final record of the project for f; r conaideratLon by appropriato decisionmakers. the Draft 211 86-4, I had a difficult tuns trying to idontify 44W. ONVWC Vn6lem as stated in thIL document. The report talks about 1 #tld 1�iCh M tegud to people. '8 Iftaft AIR* motion 2.0 oravi.den a project Description for the propu ed p90j"t, Section 2.2 of the Project Description states that *The IRA WW- wl�/1�, yyyy 1 r fP 'fir;'^y��' •,I �� �,' Y' Yr I, ,v qqn, y; 1 �i"rdo petesrtfAl affoots of dev*loping 320073 mquare fleet of caaseercial 4"r oftwo ows and can *ppxo% wrt*ly 636 parkins space, two level parking s' #" As noted in the rerponas to comment HUS 1, Section* 3.1-3.8 "mass praj*at-specific and cumulative i,apacts assc.ciatsd with the Imp).e- ' Wastation of the proposed project. I*A o9ament is noted and included in the final record of the project for rev*ew ad aotwfdaration by appropriate dacislann leers, SM 3 damnt . In the satter of structures, the report states on pages 1 and 2 that "the dlovnto nt spoeific plan was adopted by City Council in 1983 with the intent of recognizing t%o rich downtown history as a central focus of the City's civic, recreational and business activitiea" , If "the rich downtown his- tFory as a central focus" rafers to strictures , it rie►ems to have no intrin- sic value siuoo Heritage Square has been stricken from the list of antici.- patod prla j ec is. MW 3 Coamrout I The Draft $lit, Section 2.9 "Related. Projects" tdentiftev projects in thu local vicinity of the proposed project that may be affteted by or bevo effects on the project. The Related Projects discussion identifiem Number. 9 as the+ proposed Heritage Square- project. Heritage Square has not be eli- � ■inated from the list of City projects. SEBS 4 Com*at What has the Draft BZR 88.4 proven in relation to structures? Vas the Intent to pzav* to City Council that la there is a rich downtown history, 2) the history, of dow.1tlown would act the central focus of the City's � elvia, recreational and business activltie4, or 3) historical preservation U6049 to be defined as the relocation of structured? As an historical e'valUAtion, the Drafty SIR 88.4 has not even considered the position of the 8t.Sts" dffius of lox*Jt*ric Preservation which has stated that the area f*Wilt froe Pacific Coabt Highway to just beyond Olive and from 3rd Street E•. ft 6th Stro*t, ;9 a National. Registar, eligible historic distrUt as it ostists today without alterations and changas. 11r XW d lespowse . prase refer to the response to comment PP6t 2. SM g camant Ift "AM" CO Palo f•of the Draft QM 83-4, there to a sentence which 66OUs, 'tWW, pftpOwd parking structure and associated retail and office lops"t. 4 ,'. Have I aia*od something here? The word "this" ss the first word in the santnece should refer to a precadiog s6nt-ence but I can- cat find anything in the preceding sentence, or from the start of page one 16 .F Npi �yry�ryyy����yyi► 'Cis' Il�.j"�°r/ ��,+9 ' ..,v �,.,., • v pu t� f . k VUs patut, that aentions a parking atructure. True, the parking strue- Ls a' Mtione+d in the reaaitting body of the text, but as I to assume that ftc structure here refers to a structure with a rich downtown his- n. '8� 0 Paragraph One, pMgs 2 of Section 1.0 "Introduction" has boon revised. The VwvW14m reads as follows: ". . .w4pud by City Covxcil in 1983. . .and business acti,vit!os. The pr+4rp►oied parking structure and associated retail and office develop met were toot analyzed in the original aoantown Spocific Plan Envir'on- meetal Iapa(,t Report. " RBU 4 cos nt I would tat like to as* the parking structure which in later addressed is this report replace historic buildings. Parking is a concern, but tts value should not be overemphasized in relationship to Che value of our his- toric structures. Once a building is removed or damolished, a unique part of our heritage is lost forever. RM 8 Response Please refer to the responses to comments BPR 2, 3 , and 4, and KU 2, 3 , and 4. Senn 7 Comsat I MMUoned that the report talks about structures with no regard to people, Architecture is discussed but not the social issue and the impact Ob"a will have on the people of this area. Has any one considered the peyebalogival ani/or sociological adjustment of the long-term residents who Met: adapt to a dramtically different onvir ►nmsiat• and lost of familiar plaLeal Has the luxue of eliminating an area with a unique cultural level beep discussed? &?ecting am adjustment to his new co=znity to be an easy Oadoaver is not practical or logical. 016& 0. i94Pot to the rot-muses to comments *HRB 4 and 8. i '9 QC Y bom found no mntion of the fact that: structural and social issues in Ws area are interrelated? From a social scientist point of view, ensue tt see ftd foople go hand and hand. To identify the problem in the downtown area as purely a structural one is in this day and age unrealistic. To 17 r .■ ly ti 4*vntawn problem by relocation and demolition is to give no t. Instead, we should be restoring the area as a tribute community and its rosidente *Mn sofer to the reap► nset to com entz HRB 4 and S. Section 3 .4 "His- ipat pokes" of the Draft III dtocusse:s structural and non-structural project-specific and cumulative impacta associated Leith the implementatior }„ 09, 04 Proponad Project The comment is noted and in Auded in the final record of the project for ' revive mW consideration by appropriate docisiommkems. BSI � Corisaent I urWWrstand that the projec•r. deci.*Ivn will be made approximately 46 hours after the review closes and immediately after the public hearing on this doauieent. There appears to be no opportunity f.-r staff tc evaluate and taponsae to late or oral comonts on the draft IIR $$-4. I question my point In responding to this report, yet I am aurae thars must be someone who r rems - doe• not treat to arse history rerpera . itself as it dial in y.� 2 . You m , bets that was wheal a venture to develop a tourist attraction to be named facifio City (modeled after Atlantic: City) failed becauae of a lack of originality and forethought. Ra I too optimistic or naive to belive tHat will apt happon here again. RM 9 Re spona o Vac convent to noted and included in the final record of the project for review and eanniderrt:iou by appropri.%to decicionmakers . MU AL49X MM (RZt2) As a forner iangtime Huntin&to-a Beach resident vho had the opportunity to J vark on the Downtourm Design Cuidslines, I mat very interested in the devel- ;1` . .t of . %ba►t area. I applauded when I bard a historic purvey of the Gaisting bildilkls was in progress. The character and success of a City � ads . an its ability to nosh new and old while not hitp4griAtg one or � n . the athUr. It is disappointinS not to as* this blending happon- 'r;; 7 01ft lea4h, rrpecially in the main Street ai.ea. To further my t f nm ►axularrtand that Cheri is a plan to build a parking Y"l is j. h�1 1f'b �4rM WY }; • 1) r ___� �� .. __..�_� _._ ....... �-..�� nip � Y"T t(r' Il., t! J� 44c �7f1 Th� ,Drsft Slit WoutifLos that the proposed project structure will not face by or have vehicular access from Main Seroot, As depicted on Exhibits 'A a"114 of lmatio►t 2.0 "Project Description, " ;cotail and office devolopmant ' us" are proposed for e-veLopment along Main Street, The parking structure ' *111 bi located behind these: proposed uses, with vehicular access from Olive Street and Walnut Snreelt, Comment Is noted and included in the final record of the project for FowUm aped consideration by appropriate docisionmakers, K2U S ComeT t Duildi.hg domL1.1 - Wli+le T can' t comment; on the technical aspenis of a park Lug goza e, I can Comment on the aesthetics and feasibility of the buildinZ as a whole. 2odestrisn scale, Which was stressed he ,wily in the Guide- lines, seems to have been ignored (Exhibit 5k) . T*Ale the square footage numbers gppoar largo, the wpacea don' t reflect the varying activities Zhat are necessary for the success of Main Street, Who would rent the rpaces , olthe>r retail or office? What happened to the idea of small, varied retail stores lining the street? Thal restaurant is a nice gesture - tors sad It' s hi.dideul froat view and In an awkward place to be serviced. It' s too small to #unction as a viable alit-down restaurant and too obscure for a walk up . Ideally it would be in an area where its vitality could syL11 out into the street. . .maybe nd,jacont to a plaza. I wonder what type elf layout would make then useful . I realm admit I soiled when I saw the elevations (Exhibit 14) - someone, had read the CuidelLnese. They are not meant- to be a. shopping lint from which earry elarrent aunt be used, though. The most successful elevation are the Valnut Streat &ad Olive Street ones , Here the building id broken down into ruler "digestible" parts by keeping a simply vocabulary. The Third Ste•"t e'levttiou uses a technique which in school we fondly called "shrub it up In other words, hid* what no one would Mont to look at with trees. veto 4 ways caught. The Main Street facade is clunky. it is out of OCAU ios the area, prv%-L4ing two sense of rhytl m or consistent vocabulary to give It undexxUrdiag. There is too much going at. raking it appear ftsqv aspocially •L*ce the plain is so stral.ght-forwardly simple. ' oaam+ nt is not" alnd ineltdad in the final Lecosd of the project for oW so consideratLon by appropriate decisiam akers. r pro'„r lot � atwral aoatlbilIty - on page 31, the EIR states , *The architectu- ecp t!�U of the 200 block on the valet side of Main Street is similar to th* itl=ture on the protect site' . Than on page 34, ". . .the short-term arMtoctural style of the proposed project will not be compatible with the i, 1p _ a 1` •1 Y I 4 P-0-4"W` . �rK � ri�a+1; • nx ij arsbiteatural styles. . .This is a ^port-teas+ significant twpact to a fait ctti�rah desip". all thin use of "ehort-tern" Implies wiping the am clean and starting umv. If that is the case, then why did the City r' rr r lals►s hopes with a hirstoric survey? The proposed building is err- ' 1 t&Wy trot eowpttible with the area in either type or denip. NU b Asrpoare 110ask rotor to the responso to comment HRB 3. .�y ' V2U 4 Ccaanut Nita Street is an important area to the City both from a public relatiuns+ point of view and an economic one due to its proximity to the ocean, It. can aither be a place where one passes through with tunnel, vision or vhere oars to drawn to by the actiNity. It: is important to remember that vhi1s the beach crowds are saasonal, the reaideats are pas-menent. Both groups mould benrflt from such +amenities as housing, sports shops, good rsstau- rams, small convenience stores , stationery stores, bookstores, a theater, and the list continues. It's the variety of activities that will br!ng the lire back Into the area. IM2 4 Response The i:ommenv is noted and included in the finAl record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers, 113L2 5 Corlaent Vhile 1 sense tko problems with the araa being designated "no growth" , I also feel the histoz:.c aspects can't be ignored. The EIR goes to great � pains to state that the project is located in a possible hbstoric district sud list the criteria for its acceptance. Uhile not currently eligible, rehabilitation of just four potentially contribur-1og buildings would change j (pip. 54-35) . It seers a Amu to ignore that fact if there is a j OWMe t1b cont:ium putting ass* buildings to goad use. The statement on � V. 64 that there would be •aignificaat adverse impact on the recorded his- I Ors of the City of RmtLmgton beach, . ." due to the fact that all onsito st turis would be rawvad struck as as odd. Why wws this site chosen? t aro the alternatives? • �� � %eepoaar 1'l a refer to the Draft 11R, Beation 2.5 "Project Objectivss* which statoff time objectives of t"G City of ihentington Beach with regard to tbo ""od project, Please alto refer to the Draft MR, Section 4.0 "Altar- aaai"s To the Proposed F.ojeat" V.Ach idon+tiftes the alternatives to the A+'opass+d p�'o j re t. { 20 .. Mr I ' q� I i 4 + r ' MGM' 1 z'a .,.. NIL= i 1�Orrit 1 was dismayed to rare the lack of effovt when it caste to alternatives. Then warmed to be several which should be looked at in more dopth. Alter- vAtive 4,4 an p. 101 r*&ds As a viable tine - less impact on historic build- iqp and fever people being displaced while still being within walking dils- tsme to tiro wator and thus increasing pedestrian traffic along Main Street. The biggerAt strike agetimst it saema to be that for the make of 41 V*rkdn #'press historic build op would be torn down. A warped sense of PtlerItU40 it •ew" to Me. , �,•,• � g Besp~oase , The draft it&, Section 4.0 OXIternativea To The propox@A Proj6at" identi- fies fiva alternatives to the proposed project. Thrao ,.i thew@ al.ternm- tivem wore identified as environmentally superior to the proposed project snd should raasin under consider4tion. Fle,.isa refer to the response to comment DPa 5. Alternative 4.4 ` Altexnativ© Location' is identified iri the Draft Elul. as being environmentally superior to the proposed project and should remain utWor Consideration. The comment is rioted and included in time final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate .6xcistonmakena. 9Bh2 7 CWment ipon reading Alternative 4 , 5, 1 began to realize thAt the City has tts mind >eads tip not to compromiso on any point. 'his time the, Clark Hotel is the wild card • naving it again would moan less parking. Equating loss parking ; spaces with lose of revenue is a big mistake. The amount would be absorbed'; with imraated retail sales through a revitalization push, not a bulldozer. { Y. 22U 7 Response Draft EIR, Sootion 4.5 "P'restrvation of Clark Hotel" alternative does >st state or make any inference to "Equating less parking spaces with loss 4f pmvije. . ." The Draft BIR states that the altex=tive is environmen- l) nuperiair to the proposed project and should remain wader consLder- coy "% taegI*t is an lmportmat UWeditat to the suocoss of any City. This &Wki tab ptitxudo- development g but it *It* allows for the uniqueness of the 1 to azter.. Dtsatington Beach is lucky to have Atom@ of its bistory still , 'bte Md if "serves to be respected.. Ka.;v titles have been faced with "me deeisloss Mben offing old and new. Dn a large scale there are &*sihft and Philadelphia, for exaapla, but on a stuller, more similar scale t opte at* aoamities suet as Lag=a Beach. Bach one preserves its unique- noss while still looking to the future with now construction providing s&5*4 mienities and variety. These are the economically prosperous and +; 21 t i 4 :,..' 1 yi ��.'',•' '. Sri ^T r,il •" 1 \ +'ft„if�r.'14: ti ,: r3 agLf,, 4M1�•,, wall-visi,tod duties , i feel that before a decision is made an this pro- t, ire + tai�.ad study on alternate sites and prope.;nls should be a= OF IMpT Top g"Og NISTOnc RESOUCSS BOAM CHE71 MB2 1 mat I hx" revLaind the staff report, the Draft EIR, and nuaorovis other City plaNnalog doetmints during the past few days and have come to the conclusion w that you are not ready to oaks, an affiraative decision on this project for trio following reasons. 2 1 "Spouse The uoureasent is noted and included in the Finial record of the pro j ecc for review and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . i 2 Cammeat Subsection 15002 of Title lk etatea that the basic purpose of CEQA is to inform goverment decisiorma►kers Arid the public about: the potential, sig- nificant *nvironeeental effects of proposed activities , identify Voys envi- ransental damage can be avoidied or significantly roduced, and prevent AlLg- :_ nificant, avoidable damage to the environment by requiring changes in pro- jects throuSh the use of a Ittrn4tivex or aitigaarion when the &%39ncy find* the ah"oo to be feasible . This Implies tliat decistona-skers are charged with careful evaluation of the environment-al documents and are ant:.tled to co Wle to reports. UM2 x R,ssrmse The eameent to noted and included ir. the final record of the projecx; for review u►trd consideration by appropriate decisionmak'ers. i SU 3 Omm at Subsection 15089 says that the lead agency shall prepare a final SIR before i the Projrett. Also, subsection 15132 says that the final BIR 1. tuluds comments mW re+coawrddations received on VA Draft EIR, whtch, Z era sum Suludes those expressed at tV i hearing,, AS %MU AS TSB I t' r MUMS Gy 2W LM AGIM TO THOSE Cam. Au rAah as staff would like � -0.0 ' ccwpiy with those criteria, I don't see hour they cam and stall 111V r you Orr to ta*iev the f1twl EIl In a responsible fashion this r oning. It to A* Oplu on of the City of Huntington Beach that CEqA Guidelines Sec - tim I'M sud 15132 have boon complied Mitt+. Iry. 22 ��. �y. .. ' .J 4 +,f P 1 . ,M EOW B' and included in the final record of the project for f. rovtNr wd consideration by appropriate decisionmaketrs R t�•_ ��� g 11{r it"twal Compatibility.- Subsection 106 of the. National Act: for Kis- '{^ ` tatte Preservation says that alterations to federal buildings or those which f 4too JoUral participation shall be its accordance with the Secretary of :44W tategj*r' 8ui.delinas. Those require restoration to historio +desip a AvAi possible, thin use of authontle materials R The post office falls Uw1#s►s ibis Juriadiotion, and the Spate offlea of Historic Preservatlon has SaMeated thst the rehab block, project does as wall, Therefore, the mi ti- dAat:i= ALA says these structures Kill be modified to match the new pro- ject: ney not be possible. M2 4 Response Tho City of Himtiltigtorw Beach does not intend to use Fedwiral funds for they UbAbMtatlon Block or heritage 5q"ra projects, >�� 9 to�e►xrt � Xa addition, the staff report states that the lead agency shall stipply ivatoxv&tion about Federal and Stace assisted housing programs to persons displaced by this protect. This iaaaplien consideration of rho us* of Fed- oral no"y for relocation. If any Federal moray is Included In the pro- ject* aither for conat:tucx:ion or relocation of displartsa, the guidelines of subsution 106 apply to thLs project. It is imperative that a► full clexification be ailada of this issue. 8�8 S lkesponse 1'h4 City of Huntington $each, is rot using Federal Fun" for either the con- st metlon of the proposed project or the relocation of displacees . am 6 COMAnt 060traxy A:o the staff report, thli project plan is not consistent with the kl FIn. 'Flr N plan &tatara one of the goals of the Open Space ftW Cen- $4~1ft Zl to "prosetving ind protecting areas of ctignifleamt his- 8t a� ssmia MW arebmWIPSIcAl value (subsection 2.1.3.3. 1)l'. Urweir „. OMXRV4210N MOU TY ARFA9 It: Usta es a first priority area ep vir►lruisbl• a esn or u mecestary strut aft; iden- , nand Prwwraa v&l>orlo sites (Figure x-Z)' . Tho 11R •tat•* 66 406 the ataft r trt that th* clairk Hotel to v1piticant, +end 1 .` , OJ ig rrithis a 06tential National Regiasto r Diotriot. It vas tom, till Of the '*O* ddty 404 aawMil as recently as ,iu-w of 1984 r : t i twat and presoxve areas *=h as third. For this rearsn, a -;Ilrvgy Was ' ' +t ►l-t:od and a resource board established. It: crisply doesn' t maker men** for staff report to Irwre this criteria of the General P.en. 'r 13 SQ'L0' ' 7 e � f r'1i to ftss vsfttto thq a&ka&n to ter City of &ntington IA&ah staff report r��r --}oa d prejset. dIAOS natiewids are sir 4tnly rerop taitg the value of th sir historic begimning to rector* ti-An. 1 wcg(, you to regturt* that ejop o11 paw-siblo alttamatives to obliteration of this aul- Im' tlkt ssii i that you tali wio* to read current literAture and con- ' ' Rabb i%i Vatential of our old downtown with others. I thank you vill be sw*Tjoed a 11ad you delayed ni-tion, nsi y Reopt�+sw The ooawnt is noted and included In the final record, of the pro j ace far revieft and consideration by appropriate dteimienmakers. BAd"" 3aUCOVICR ON) I find vWself in a uAlque position. Today Is October. 14, 1988, two days befogs, the aloes, of the public response period to they Draft EIR 88. 4, 2pA 81e01K p4rktug structure. Yet, in addition �o Draft EIR 88-4, 1 h-,'Wai in front of nia the staff rsport an the pro;ccr Atch rec amends cet:tit. tion of the 9*9L. kart of the staff recomman"d action ix a resolut;,on No. 140E which st*cos that: "ale persons and agencies wLshiug to respond to notice ftly givou have been heard by the Planning Commission enter through written :wtLce or during a publLe 'hearing un October 18, 1988, wed such responses and c:oam+ents as „ were nisdo were du1,y noted s•A4 responded, tow . ;a';' t is sated awl included i.n the final record of the project for ' r�re"X and 001WASra�tiM by Appropriate tls,cisiotoakm►re. ';r° •a U M11101y CJWt eta t can Ya.ipond tb my written! aorerts, nor thort of late in the rev t*v ariod, nor to moose�;. p presdntad duucinS 160 J06W haniml on Oatabst� ��: �,�:� d4ta� 181 1988 in the tim for the f1.u►ning Cow* �` ���•� d raC �[, aqM date. 24 �6 r Y b v.i•: (A } T'. ;, , r e Y,' 'p•yy "1M�.PM•;?, WO'. •ri.i.;."' Af'' 'f •,,, ,�,. 07 T 0 "IT -r' ''I ,1`�f r+ A,f yF, Mrs 1 y;ti ,tj+rw1, IF f•^t;' N'•� T'IN ', 4{'= yi� 7 }r I� I�• T M ',A r T ✓ k? 7 _ I �. . f ° ''•( 7, ,,1'h i r i 1YI -�i� AA 71 y,' r +" .+ , An • + •Irp 11/Ir A A,'• .r r yI ' v� .•r'..If � r " ,•d• r�j� .. . �' ,.r�'Y4L ':i' .r w �',,i,� •,t y' .,r "i�l� '�r7 `./ T' YTM' �'(' R '' ` ` •Yi r ,k A 1�7 '• M i,a �I r.r� 1 I +r ( T fl "Y.r. , 7 •.1 sad, , Y f -0•.' e r., �t. r' - M 1 ,! T 'i 1' ;ti•'I• � � �y • � ' Nr' r'r ^, ,! opr.to !• '� �. 1 r. J r ' Q •r Y�,h „➢1 P .. +T, r �, J �_n,Y_'M '�4 �+�\, � '} '>�! r.}Y y'!._ M!'f1i 11 •. • Y ' � � ,3 . � � nib .� ilk.M �. . •:� 1 'u' , ■ �, F '4 .rK .Mir; ,w JdN..:k.. ,rid , ,+�. �,T. a'.,�'r• r r , I v. as odmokot is".%OM d 04,U0104ed.'.18 do 94MI .racosd of rye p Ja*t for, °.•.+,,., ,' �' +1p4�1d�de�e�rti� 1r�r ��t�� deairion�iterr. it I Y •, I tboudbt tW puVVose *f the pAIU AVOW Md the respeOe :,POsio 9 Mis to ampile a -final SIR for the decision making body to study AMP TM TAKR ' dN. , ketiop 13069 (a) of, the Wdekis es for iapla Ution of the • 04iforWLA Swir+ *4l Airy Aot states tit ..a final IS met be pro- '' prod -belora approving tho project and in section 15009 (b) dt&t lead t ma provide an opporumity for review of th4 final Sit iby the h" p lY�► or bar oamou ing agencies before approving the project. Me ton- Unto of this SM are spse fled in section 15132 of the sage document &Ud ji ,part (b) oosmients and rem,- .-.ardations received on the Draft EIR sidor v%Aatis or in summary end (a) a list of persons, organisatious and Uq ssacies ' commuting on the graft SIR. - It seem quits oloiar thgt tbMw ro"irerents cannot physically he accoaplished within the proposed �':. tine frames.PUasss rrofer to the response to convent WB2 3. Wamt recomftend that the Planning Commission request a co'ntinuasce 4f J+his "it4a _z+til all the con ■ents, written and c-ral at the Public Hear- ing, can be sdd;;assed, additional information be ivelusded and another pub- 110 review be completed of the rinai EIR. The impact of this project is far too Feat to. proceed otherwise. 1�10 OGNOWnt 1s stated and included in the final record of the project for i SeViiw avd'isonxNeration by appropriate decIsLormaMrs• I' am 9 t I h#ve rsrvieved the ElR 88-4 and agree with the conclusions of the ennsul- tant that there is no mitigation which will sufficiently lower tr6 imp -cc of thL9 project on the historic areas of the Ci q. s Reepo}ase • The Draft BIR, Section 3.4 "Historical Sesourcep-9 ,states.: "The proposed project will have a significant effect on the racorded history of the City of Huntington Batch, On City proposed Main Street Historic District, ag r 25 r 'S': .. _ Y'E n df ri .r•�a....riJl� i 1L � u r � 't '•r r h v " r h t , v , � 1:4+� vi'�y t� Y *! 5.1�;t1, r• ' , 4'.R'w• '. �r' �' u" ue a,.r .l i1n. M' re0rsos. rats act am be 18440urd a tiptieoi but oat eliaLmatedt, &A •"r' {� ��� �' ��1��; 1rat, �� aa�lw�tl.oa �rsth ati�x it m "d roraadbly ferns le futua pro- 141 gut � m a sts" t attestt �'a d WtOW 419 08 Oity of W=tLuxua Ruth, tba city pro- lost. Obts - lUftele Ubtrim. and llistorla tea sell W&MAk %%$ a s ty 44nerMxly." ;. t is rooted mA inaluded in the final record of the project for ► oiatzMt3ony topriot« diraiAioakers. r ari.tiqat to ucudarstand that tha state #„ ptd#xp th�#, tq bw a Vrttoml Registor-aligible historic di.s- A*C VWMAO 4tecatUm to the present strwtures. This infountion a aorop ',UWOrtant to seriously consider one or a combimtion of trr +atxv. p�:1aj•.ats 1l.atad in the Silt. dI Wool M �1��P'''" ' a '*($Id+'L!' w'•�f;,fir l . '{ # ► ' #.a sot" wad £nalwftd iu the final record of the project for ;� sidrrattoa by gvrop:tati dwaiaioas�akers . ' ' ► A, ,Aos Zbe tld op the black which recjuire seiaac uppade. . fir 1 told by r .� ,icmm of the historic Mdlding Code Comission, OAS %hot. they qualify for *valuatiad and ropair tinder that ! 1 4 ch smoorE s a e rodes ...� '! � s�,i TM E:XR &08 . "t • , a 'VOW bw b6ftl tie. Stile public safety Ls stt11 c! prwAsions they differ in degree f raw modern w ' ► rrrr. a wistaria ago* p2►i.siona in this area may affect d w t6storation to slew it more faasWe to ratain the buildinSm. ' Orion OmmI to be addressed. .7 U.q Wkft UW o4ift ' IF tasted and included in the final recor.i of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decioiomakers. 11ii • � , Became this it within a historic area, flanlumd by the partially federally fUW" tabob block ad the federal post office, the recomendations to radme architectural itrcanpatibility are not fe"ible. Any alteration to these adjaaont projects, T wWerstand, is subject to Section 106 review by 26 j� y� `+ j' 1 v M_, Y a yr r' '.r . r I� �. '� 3-y m., �V S �Y♦ 41 ..rp a�. fJ T k /• „r VMI�i o- , " S "ti�i J/� ji,n r!Y �r�T `4 r'r. � +►a JTr i ' � �, ��i �f.Y�r • y cy r y r . ., �' r }•1 *' r •� V�t �r / 15 .R: `7SC alti /iry+�` I A '.`� " r W '';L �,�.Y rR.� f+ , �'r t,•' 1./ 11. yp '°Vi� 1��� •f 6iA �y n �� r wM 14,' ••1 ` •, b ,(i . • S :A'�,tY1rTi. 11 '� L.If,•+ IJ R.' l . n i .. ....�.. '1 � 1n ' w, ► `VC ttitstoxio Rosa tioa, ead uItioately, the 3ecloury of the I; I 4 doubt tb+rt these paler trnuld harnd ►ls to i OSOW 4''neuron PTO Ssre f arse, she prapased a , . ga,t1:volt ,bo,Omw#6001A Kish► tb surrounding sutures if to vWlealprrd to cogiiment them. Y V ntw to As. response fo c~at HRX2 4. ►U I sha+rs the •agnituds of the cumulative tupact of the presently pro» , en the historic area. In tbo apace of just a ��few years, �ert�ii �the hirtoriu tommercial structures of the coommIty will be U ,4,« Wo mil. aamplately destroy the troUtional character of tlu CO Oo Gib X &Minion to these abt:iaipated Impacts i i b.tve ,jot leer kbat t prepense gerit • $ytr�tce has been dilated from tote tray Jhp"eat •V64. Tbia passible loan stakes the redesign of the present t, .t Imperative since the relocation possibilitiea have di4in- trot I" StIMOVA •es. . 1 Cryt Y 66ioe prig to the response to aoasewnt HUB 3. a�tleMoerie feasibility stwly for Alternative 4.60 design alternative slreu#�d be prepared and carefully analyzed. The only real draw back to this 4"W"91we I that it impacts Phase I. If the puxpoae of the parking At ute%to truly to pttovide parking for this project, then it should bear MOM of the burden of its visual blight. Careful design of this alterna. ic41ft sbsv44.apara some of the few rensL.irg caww lty historic stteunt:ures aid MCi,tl provide pricking for a distirztly different modern st.ruet'ure. •a tr is mt+sd and Included in the final record of the project: for ro law and'•consi%errtaon by appropriate decisiomakers. comment if fU'dowission must: act on this project without further cotuideration, I Wald urge it to deny the project entitlements, stad also reject the diMlaraittion of Worriding rAcessity to proceed with the project I" deeip ed. ire is an obvious noted for Additional, parking convenient: to t1w cost, but sera tine planning should be able ' to find a compromise location which will not; destroy the unique character of our historic city. 27 17 �r gs 01 poi ;R '1!T'�' ', 'i• I c y ! r r p, t►u". it to physically Improbable that a !'final 0,10we ih aaasdme* with CgQI! requirmrrnt'o on the Maing of Ny lair tto dta f t % .iA- -tJAv four ► Cq�o�glsoioa to get. �ie �t nti��f Should � rUl 'd on the 11mmi 'silt prior Al l466l4 -iri dw fttitl #atatd of thi pycaj•at for ait4ptLan which w1U lessen the imps t of this project on this , r: �1►�av sirs. I Y 1 y r 1 and LmIudsd In the Meal record at for pxojoat for si4mration., by rpirrapxirte draiaioswskar; Wn project is within a Xxtioml Resioter-eligible Historic District and ' I E ; nw*wW the bulk c its attwtures. 14, y' Vho $00mat Is noted cad inaludad in the final record of the project for � Famnsidration by appropriate dociaiomd ors. 45 i t1:* t V°Mxtotic Building Code it mandatory for buildings aithIn a his- ! a afti supo medas local seiseia Codes. 1 , toim iout ' is noted and Lacluded in etas iinal record of the project for mvlow load consideration by appropriate dealsionaskArm. 26 yq,!'1R}rCr+',y01 �N 0- + *A %, + +,0*4.'I • ' if 4 + r l � � � �, ,;, r �..���k•7 i'�r .17r��•��T '�.j J , +, �- t +r�Ty, ++r�� ��q I,a��"�,Y'f(rJ .`� \ , .?���Y+Y+�,� ,i, 'u5.i 1 .r J.���E� +f`ry,f�R, , i"• , . A•�, y�,�'r ,�jIC=, �a �s J r.a , h .3,Or w w A. .1 .w1,w.,f a�.. .J.��• .,.�.. �'. J:i•l:nja�rp. , lL'. •t . b* d"Is Md by altor odj"*M US xl, ►• � tus e ost to tadssdi mULSOLOd f V t ' -71 fut r TTTT"""�.r N f lrr f• t L' 's do response to M2 4. gated "A inolu"d in the ft"I record of the Proisat for • 3.. , ry""�,:";� sad oldi�satioa by a�rp�eopt`iate d~aisia�ksrs. TW m"ative i,npatt of We and proposad projects trill virtually aliai- �' `. tlbo City's btatoria resowass. Beritap Square in no longer a plan- option to retain bWortant displaced historic strwtures. { tom** rofar to tke romponse to comment 002 4. is wt e ad .included In the final reaard of the project foir aoxdetatirn appropriate deaiaiammakers. M. *aoa"s feasibUitl study should be prepared for Alternative 4.d, 46AV altanw%ttmm. This appears to be a solution. I `I .aunt is noted and imludad to the final record of the yrojeat for "460 4" oftsideration by ,*praprlate deeisioam' kern. At thia tip the project entitlousnts shoold be denied. e,. � 1p �4sNp�rpse fhe Oemomt is noted and Included In the final record of the project for rawtoN amd consideration by appropriate decisiormW ors. IN 10 Gcwm at Tbere are insufficient grounis for ■ statement of overriding necassity aim* the result of the project is to hasten the lows of the entire hori- tap of Hunting on beach, 20 r r � J � �� ', c t� :�� ���._ ,.;;y�',���r����}�� � i���� y �� 1��"�l,ti�.��4 S�A!•� ►�AY�� �.0 •� ;R•v.. - '� r••y �- •� •y r c.F, , r � t e ++ y'' �'YY+ry� �.+,� �Fd. t�n� H t i , rr� ` �, ji♦�{: * .e 1 -- a Sr o r- 4� � - .1T f1 a. sN, � `� -� - �-�uc b/{, '":`.`.��v �:�r{ ypr�_��'}� �r•�i F n,�t` ♦ � ..- :.- ° 1 1, - .Y�nx. r�� 4`�� - ,, A :.a �brtA } ��r,H •�'h� "'fq�+ V� YI W- i:',, r.�r.���.;: �• ' i r' { �I • f +.� i. t. �-�: �..• f L'{�'�,{n1�1 .1yF� -f 1{�f •_� PS J,'�.Y rY-• ��.�: t�'� rw ME 1p ram,•f„w; ', r r.�l�'I'; u♦"rj N :r • , 1 " +h -d 1 r . �{ 4 a 1•' "`i �frr ! ✓� ,��4. j.f�'j, Y '� J �r �� : n 'dY y fr ,r rY •�Irly�i�'d.� ir, '.�1Y� I�r 1 �1'" '�, t fir. �,�J AA'h�'' FFFF ri •,t1�t • r � 1� � 1 y., �, r.1J`'S..1'T7 Ii� � ts� � � r'�} r li 1 • 1 r A F tS^y h {i A'�,•k (t�y� >i 1� 11 r . : r + 'y ! • D't•';+y,1 M�' t. ��„1' ♦�{��{�{.y R ,1. 1 1 i 1 '+. • .. (' ,••� J:, I J^^^^^^NI,,,���C,Yllllll 1�1,� ,r�ryA�'�1 Y.•' � 1'��. • ♦ ' . ,, ' r + 1 AA WIT IY �� Hirr y., r 4 k�NrlMt�',y�� �"wA �!''�''! 1, i:�lA R � 1 • � rR '! e �i +�►'Y 777,4T'�, tXa � JI IdI��i.} �rw a`S ,y 1'1d f RRRRRR777yy�� ,,� }h� jj.1 i L�'1��•1 )r'w��1 r••YI, :!'r� ' ,� �., .� ..+ ; ". f••'r ' �y ��rr''' � *,*1 •� 1 r.r ,`'{�:'�`fL�t'•1�•;�`�#�• �� �LfJ{,�'/��,�, '� � 'i. r i, I Jl'' .{� ..fytti 1 Y � .v,r�J{•►1�,.••{� 11 .' 1• Nr , ` r',T,'� 1�, 4. ! • F •• "li•'•f /{YIrF �y r•R(�_ � ..�'.L. ,t'' r )•r�1 el ('i +•Ir�'' ' t �' f` '(A/•` ,�:�• ' ��x�� �u,F7. '� ',4 rJ►',,,-,.�Pj= .,i' Ir, +?"�', .t,�;,G:•f� . ! t�. '"Y'� w � 'I�I } �/�h+l �l r4�(r:'�:4 .r'' h ♦ 1 '' I �.. .1'S.•'"—' "r S'1"`�� si� r.•(r.Nr''±'.•��4r,�r� •��!''�4 •�� �. �'�` !y�fypN i!• 4 ► r ,.�'':',•.•. t 'r tr • 'Rr .:• �!,•+ •A f .: ,� 1 �! •�i ',•>..tS '!,1 �'Y 7� •..1' �•1�h,r'�1 „'• 'T' 'r. S .y= �r r r•, .) , i. rl ;i•.'� :1 't �.I.L• 'a•r rr. A '/ •V' �i,. k r11R•.�' t. t.• IS•• • � ,r., ., • � � tiY,�41..1 i'+.1 r, . •! .M,•��:•�L .s.'�♦S!'A♦.... 'rr I'�,' . •�• �I �F A YtL •!+ •• r'• �' '�1'•j�,y{.+_.�At I�r •i�ttl► �.' X �•F,.�' •Z f:, t ' a lyl�• s• 1�s py. i.M, f r. ti.i r '.J•1 r'QI tvp1�!, • � �I�iJ,+(Q'V r e ,.,A'{, ti! y r I ��1ty�`•hi`:� tr j�r r1Y, `'��'t r, ,� '1't` 1� �,', } . . ,•, 1 � j3'��y � � •M1�'y4,.�!} yJti.. '��r� �,+r'+�1�5.. �. •.y ti r; ,'.. r •, • • ogle l,r. h , ! 'lrir" •,i, r.4�,1.� r• 'A � � I" �� � ,�,'. r ! r •'.• r y� r.' �s •.�+. �" 7 S Tilly.- 4r ! t �1 � ��160 ;4 fis V - / 1 { ' ''• P ,' w �tr1 llh,t r, I w / 1'.M a J Js ' r + R r` 1y1�.. ',dt' `x,i. r Ml �,6 �r �r • ,... (' - 'ir ;' ` ,, 7,,, +: .Ir rt, /}� �' 1 , F ryJh 1' s � t ,rt #fw• , h r " gy'!r t V / tr JAU ik4' -' i r �ky.T«^rT*7 .. ' �, wVlYr++y1•y`.-....rrhi .. r r A. mlar + » c r un 00 2.1/ goo88-4/T"ZA3' 016 Wall-M 118-385 •.J A•: O WW"Wi ;' ' to top * 5-Loyd Parking Structure mitb. 32r673 $"are Poet of Commercial) y Yy T= that the Huntington Bauch City Council will a Subtle hewriag in the Council Chat e r at the Runt ingtort Basch 10 . t:4rr, 2000 loin Street, Huntington Beacho California, on the � 4, . he tin indicated below to receive and consider the b ill rsoax who wish to be heard relative to the ' g8 'on snarl Taal. xo..mday'o Liowop��r 7, 1888, 7 t+�0 � ; ► # ' el to Ala aaing Commission's approval of C�►el�.itional We Permit Ho. 88-34* Coastel Developmelit VorrAlt go. 88-27, Xavirommantal Impact Report No. 88-4. and Tentative Parcel map No. 89-385 ; : fixity of HUnringtOn Beach Redevelopment Agency z Counci lwaiean Meth Finley t10,ptbssx% of Maio Street - 200 Block (bounded tT Min raetp 1161gat Avenue, Third Street and Olive Avenue) $ z D►wmt*m dPeCitio plan District 05 (Mixed Lis* - Cpimi orclail/Off ice/Residential) llppeal of Planning Comission0a approval of sa approximately 827 space, 5-2evel parking structure with 32#073 square feet of commercial, and a ropeat .•a to C6440lidate 38 late into one lot and vacate an . e•l3rwy. • z covered e1r Suvironmeeta) Impact Report No. f 88-4., also being appgal ed and W ch will a;so be " considered by CouncM IMAM The subJect area is within a non-appealable area of the coastal some. ,. , A copy of zhe proposed request is on file in the Department of Community Development, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 52648 , for inspection by the public, ALL rWn=STZD PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and wMre8s opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further quentions please call Louts Phillips, Assistant Plcnner at 536-5271 . Connie Brorclkwey city Clerk ., o, i+ f�¢` '�i t� s,�1 r � , r u,I �. � d_• J1M )4r►r,,,w. A t hri ,to� "'b ! �, ��,• � .P� 1 f y_J . 1 � c / '�' Y 4A, p' r 'i4 w,b �,�y, t • y��Ir fG ~r p r�,� i 4F.M� � a° � '•✓r E oy W U�L', ,v�.•r'V) �y�•M,9 r r��' �� l .. , '��y(t rr ly{.•F ��!� I' 1.„ 'r r. ', s YY C4 !W. w ��1� ♦� V�i t • rll T"f,: � t t����i17•5 ry�tYr,J i Vi w tis ;r • '�l.- r'�y . '41 t OR C;LE�i '. ;e "�.ati 'J1rt+,. �'w r�. �RLT. M��•— 'WITIR Jil'l"OW �q��7F�T 40 I ) n , ,gy�.1,►fie sra ) e +��r�ls: �« L w C 4 L. v T� F ir� lye S ''4 F i C • LAW }441 q0 I fl 1 , r+)r•��1 t���y�j, Y 1 t 'ter• �1: � . ' ff � �N11 L,"ii B��IM* S 1 r 'a ',� ' ii.yJl '1 •' " h � ' 'a ,�� �W' �F t' l a .. .•.i i A J M 7 +f .f • . l N'rr ,YY , Y.q ; (.YS ?+ ',• cr,„ .h � 1'' . .•' � �r>k r.��"�wlrr�4' � ' e.yn :WA f r UUM C00 J NIN AP VAL OF C01WITIOUL [ice 1 h. ,• . ."'�' #�}444BTAh M" Pl4R![I'f not 8 R-2 7.' ZMACT RX"ITT NO. e -4/'! NTATIVS PARCEL 1W 80-385 . a �t�BSt i8 to dovelop a 5-Level ParkLAg Structures r .l +sit 013 Bqurr• Vivt of C roial} 1CH IS UDC GIV= that the Huntington Beach City Council Will bo14 a u XJ,c hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach ' 41a10 r, 2000 Kain Btroot, Huntington Beach, California, on the dote *ad . it t time Indicated below to receive and consular the stet ants of all persons who Nish to be heard relative to the application described below. Monday. Novemtoa,r 7, 1988, 7:00 PK Appall to Planning Commission a approval 'of Conditional User Permit go. 88-34 , Coastal ' Development Permit Ro . 88-27, SnvirorAental ' Impact Report No. 88-4. and Tentative Parcel � Map No. 88M-385 � % City of Huntington Bbach Redevelopment Agency Cduaci iwocaan Ruth Flnlayr Southeast of Main Street - 200 Block (bounded by Main Street, Walnut Avenue, Third Street and olive Avenue) Downtown Specific Plan District 85 (Mixed Use - < Commercial/Office/Residential) w Appeal of Planning Coromisacion's approval of an appToximately 81.7 apace. 5-level parking structure with 32,073 square feet of commercial , and a request to consolidate 28 lots into one lot and vacate an � alloy. TAL ATA=: Covered'by SnvironmentaX Impact Repott no. 'I 88-4 y also being appealed land which will also be considered by Council. 9"nald, BT�: The subject area is within a non -appealable area of the coastal sane. • ON ZILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Department of Community Development, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Bauch, California 92648, for inspection by the public. ALL 119TEREPSTS1 PSRSOINS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as • outlined above . If thore are any further questions please call Laura Phillips , Assistant .planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clark r ' y 99 r .pro P•yV'k, 7 R' yn. pewp4at f t 6 Walnut '118 Walnut " Such, CA 62648 Huntington Heaah, CA 92048 Pantington Beach; CA 9264 ii,, ''' fir'•' _ y r 4 r .4.• (�Oup�Dt O� �t r $Oil Thins street 223 'tll Ird Street � i CAgg444 Runtington Bo4ah, CA 22448 Mathiton leach, CA, 92644 Oacup413 t OQaupan t S1 t 115 'TMrd Street l IS 'Chard Street "Pot" Demob, CA 91048 Huntington leach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i At � Occupant Occupant F �i l�Street )�4 Third Street 220 Third Street on deaah CA 92448 � bunt ton Beach CA 9264$ f Huntington S�ct� CA 9264$ , t r ng ' 000 wt Occupant Occupant $10 Ibird Stf*et ! 214 Third Street 218 Third Street :'. lMUngton Hnech, CA 98548 ' Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 i Huntington Beech, CA 92648 fit Occupant ! .occupant {` Tim !'dtteet 224 `Third Street 22aA Third Street ` JIt tol Be ch, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 9264$ I 1 , bas�*nc' Occupant Occupant trd Strast ! 30r2 'third Street I 306 Third Street `' ti On Beech, CA 92648 I Huntington Beach, CA 925. 8 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r I r kkk .t `a r l it •--k,7 nt ' 303A mein Street 30ln street CA 0" : U diagton Smoh, CA 93649 - , Huntingtap 8oaoh; CA ol�4/� M Rt„ ,•�i�,•�,`�j�. 'f !_k.M ..�. '�.ar...rr�. � �f1y,•r.,..�.`r, ,y•...w _ •..�.rr. . �.lk r r 00cupont .3lu street 000 Nam str"t . . .$a" I; bi 4, , 48 Runth*tan Smaho CA 99448 Ruotwgton D"oh, CA "646 y Gaoupant Occupant Mt 924 Main Street 222 Main Street !# *Ohl CA 9$649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beachp CA 99644 .t t ( 0,cupant occupant • % de street l8 Main Street i 2l4 Main Street r a Serer, CA 09648 Huntington Beach, CA 92048 Huntington Beach, CA 99046' . occupant 09;tupant ' xgr t t 210 Main Street + 208 Main Street tom! AIhah, CA, 92648 Huntingtot, Beach, CA 92648 ' Huntington teach, CA 9264� i Occupant Occupant ..; It ott 126 MainStreet 124 Main Street Bch, CA 99046 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Huntington Beach, Ces 0*44S ' Occupant ,f t I 310 Third Street I ' `h CA 92648 � Hutntir gton loch, CA 92648 ` occupant Occupant . Ir Street 124 Main Street 122 Main Street *intogtod ] oho CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington beach, CA $$048 �t 1 Occupant Occupant 1, A **in Street ; 312 Walnut 301 walnut "Oviton Deach, CA 92649 ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington aacrhr CA 9$648 t , i t , 1 a„ 1 rly,Lr^ mow! I S�1� ti,J�1+J.1Y1M1 A. 4 J' �• Goof" k Di!y A4n*a Ferrarl �1 l Y8 P.O.-Sax 11 a 706 No Balboa Mvda s y CA o8�8 alas, AR $9024 tklbor; CA ,,f23021 T" W . . r '••�,1'���'���•,•�1�,1•1,•. ',.r' ... ` •• •ter . .W._. .. . 1 ��•• ~�M��� �.,',%Y r Jwmet 546 Coutel Devtlopment Cyr+ O T `< 700 Wo Salb Blvd: 1230 err terar street i CA $20418 aftw0a; CA 02601 Yer yxi; CA 03001 .{ Mrtm J. meter flames Z Koller Avenue 10062 Merrimac Drive 10001 Ikllantine, Lane, " y Clty, CP. 92055 Huntington Beach, CA 92046 I Huntington Beach, Ce 09647 111 m Wor4lor Valantine liarnakian Marcus McCallen III &'PWrte Rd: 312 Chicago Avenue 22816 Costir, Bella Aroa440 CA 91006 Huntington Beach, CA 92048 El Toro, Ca 92630 � 11 of Steel l3Mveiopment Ltd. Pt. Everett M. hicks K oo ,Tung Lee. *Ate t00 P.Q. Box 310 17114 Mapes �• Two C1Wporate Sara Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ! Cerritos, CA 90701 r Newport Beech, CA 92600 ! 1 vier S- ndrick Everett M. Hicks � United States of America ll 1e Circle P.O, Box 310 post Office Bldg.' ` MintiWon Beach, CA 92847 Huntington Beach, CA 92848 Huntington Reach, CA 92044 140a Duwv William D. Chilcutt James M. Briggs 30222 Deervale We 1303 Oakgrove Road 14312 Willow.Lane j'funtltgton B_ eaah, CA 926.46 Westlake Village, CA 9 t 362 Tustin, CAA 12880 t 1.'f '1.,. �4 • , W1l.x � `r''�► a= � Caroline L. Burnes Douglas Langevtn 0,suclen eve 9200 Westminster Ave. 890 8196 Pawtucket Drive l tIneon Beachl. CA 92648 Westminster, CA 92663 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 11il1iam G. Gallegos Susan H. Wullner Richard Hariow .40 50 Street 355 Vista Balya 1l1 lath Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Newport Beach, CA 9166o Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i I I I f i IMk 1 '', - �p�p�� �r^' ' �►ice,• •y r � n" M"My 0arjorio Docker two 111 }.53 T*mRlIb MY@ Jay? JAUderdali Ct� CA " I - bmaht CA 02661 Huntirgtor, ah' CAI► 02040 + � rf"�MNII.TTF +n r..,+! ..u..f+,•rT ,...�r..�r,. -'t'- 'r.•+.• 4• •... � .. .... ., w. .r .._ y, �. Y„fl►�.-•r.aw- .. _.. �... r,.. � y C` Ivia 'Ix. � ., �f.�• " �.; i; Y l i , A i ; `. Qi 1ft neieQo; CA 941 ; �1►t, to . 4+ . ♦ l y Em ei to 122 fTerry TWO ramily Trust th "et 220 Via Ben Remo State, Ca 92648 Huntington Beachy CA 92648 Newport Beanh, CA 92603 gm ftubwoot R"Ity Co. ; Dennis A. Kfacole Fromes D. Hine WX 7Mrm max 400 3rd Street 1 1123 10th Street OA soft' Huntington Reach; CA 02448 1 Santa Monica, CA 00408 }T.r STY ' V�kVpfet 0hupe Stuart Cmohundroq Ronald Memo ' 1tec Dr. West8070 Langdon Ave. #106 123 Main Street Cal 03703 Van Iftye, CA 91406 Huntington Bach, CA 92648 I 1 I ` Ahma d Ab�delmuti Eleanor J: tyrn r 11� Mains-Street � 121 Mein Surest ' oilc , CA 92448. HunthVton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Seach, Gig 9264E ,; '• '! i: . d Carlos Costa Jack ii. ^''orney 16361 Dal Mar Lane P.C. Box 23 ..y 0 tdhy CA 90740 Huntington fah, CA 92648 Ranchi Santa Ps, CA 02367 n AdR1 Musfa#e Zeicisri Charles Sarrabere Q8 i t ut J Ira tuo 16382 Patterson Le^e #1 201 5th Street wttW#00% 00deh, CA 02348 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 flunt4ton flea►ch, CA, 02648 move d. TaylorI Fletcher YL t ' George Deundian 0 0 Ind Street 310 2nd Street ' 317 2nd Rtreet Itewport Dueb, CA 02663 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I si W. NiA�a�la am�r F� 2aething too Ord ftrwt 0 a. Huntington .4"a CAS 92048 ntind on Beach, CA 92640 W.r ' �_ �•�,' Clary R. Hans '. ::.; Paul E. Amer , 302 2nd Street; 14325 E. Flomar Drive CA 02053 ( Huntington Beach, CA OU48 ;, Whittier, CA 90603 Gwendolyn W/ 502'Ciiliornlr Streit :'�22, end $t. Y J .WOO Huntfogtob Mach, CA 92648 I P.O. 11ox 167 Huntington Beach, CA 92048 �'1�( , 00rtlon De LhP;� James J. Redman .1 . Mrbrr4r � ` 330 Joliet Street 43846 N. Cyr ' whitheir, CA 20001 Huntington Beach, CA 92048 Letincaster, CA 93534 I p Bernard Mason Dewey Davide `` ' at1' i4t 823 12th Street F.C. B6k 342 lR t h Beacb, CA 93048 I Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntin tun Beacho CA 03140 Lett i h Tony Paterno � Roger Johnson i f j.40no rood Drive+ 213 2nd street 219 2nd Street tl an B ►ah; CA 92847 Huntington Beac► , A 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4' I fl� .. • � � Robert S. Goodrich Robert R. Allen $ 3th itr at P.O, Box 3F9 P.D. Boa 610 - 1h ingtoh Reach, CA 92648 Huntington Beech, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 r Pb . i�le'liar Russell Watkins 221. 20d Street Hun ti on match Ca 92646 2�51 N 0 � , Newland Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 IU*Mrd A. Hyman Marc D. Richonne W rma Pock 223 Ind Street 225 2nd Street I 8404 LexingtonRosd Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I Downey, CA 90241 1 I � ' . I 1 i I 1 i' f j gab 831maw Biy30new U. Fwry 1 ftnx%e Lane I 313 2nd Strut ` a , CA 05848 HUPtweton fah, CA 91446 Huntington Beech, CA 02648 ap Imterprii" Inge: Maurf Im Unger sufte H I19 via Tolues CA 02W Huntington Besoh, CA 9264T Clemente, CA 92672 de Mind C. Dellano . A>-0 Spar 0 Club Drive 951 Hamilton Avenue 412 Co�rrtry G`l A i46 Duena Pirko CA 90021��; halo Alto, CA 94301 David Cr Dellano Cynthls G. Taylor ;. 0"A $412 Country Club Drive 220 Via San Remo , <' CA 64162 Buena Park, CA 90621 Newport Beach,, CA 92663 Occupant occupant t 119A Main Street 121 Main Street dh, 'CA 93448 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 v. ' 01600imat Occupant occupant X treet 1211` Main Street 210 Main Street ' t� ail oh, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92848 �E Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ` Occupant ( occupant stmet 205 Main Street 207 Main Street ? boob,' CA 92648 Hudnt!ngton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92048 IL _ 1 at Occupant occupant Wn lawbOaLot 211 Main Street ; 213 Main street a 960whi CA 92648 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beaehg CA 92648 A!' Occupant occupant ' trot ? 217 Main Street 921 Main Street ww aI Beach, Ca 92848 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beech, Ca 92648 + " Orr n i +4 „*t+p,� y:•,r.` �' �F ..i''+ + .,u '•1 4'��� 'C.V1 'r�fyr:', \i '�1/y<! t II yy ''""�' , �+7 �Cam'.' > S ❑ �'_._�'4'� v►. � 1 M e r.•� ' rY •� 'i' � r iy r.. �143� A �Np:�rwi '.�� ��''� �. :1 �V� II '/� 1• YI �,4 •1 .u� � ,; r+V.aY „}• ity.�', '�� Y, ��IY" .F' �' � �. `M,Y �r� �!^ter�,iba'1 � Y+ v , :' 1'.I t14>V: ,yd't��7`�y�� 1,'�'i �,•r r � Alr 5�.�1, 1 y� Y � �i / • �s� �k . 4 Fr� 4 ���I�,h�� .�' �AS4'�'('Y, r v Y .�: 'A f��r •� I � R � ��„ •,���, �, .4 �' nr,� w ,-L+'•.�'!h' /�M%•�v�.r!.�� i.«n�M'�h If..:a.�n.. �, � �p•1 ��•jr•,� r a' V 1 4 twjo;l � ` r�� ' ��M1•1+ V +��nre�,fy �. ''i'�:flJ• 'Y � � �Y�r�'�f^�1 � : '•i `{Sr 1 nMK.d1.WYf��►w•Y �tiyr ��YH ��~r� (`..,,t,'} , t�Y c• � `A �"• rrf /��y �,• r .�yr �' _ 'arr.�.. " + ':r i i' � , +�7rvT [ r�, Y�i. ` . 'C M ! w ,,5��. LL!! 1 !. 1, �`r��j`{�,5�'i::r rS �, •���: �' r'�r;�'1�+�4n-�v'.��,�y1TY+l�*"'�p,"I,.y.. � � �1 1�+�..� `r�,� /1 �'jA1 .11.`p.,� A' � � 'r: : P�l 1� V .1 ,:��i ,L!r -� �• „`�.. -..�rw I itL�i 1�iP f 1� .>,.. � a } fill /L] k.� •' r�a'• r � Fri wte CA t /� `1I ri1 �N, 1 I� }I• Y 1 17• WL �1 �,, h,i+„A},.y�/j` 'yi hY��flf.,p, ;l�',f.') Mi •, • y„�I.Y'�1 try h .�'*. i`t :.• •' 1r , i'.,"`'+ . { �I a r�rt' :���.r 1 c•.r..-� Y S y r r `''1''r ��#'/�,�.9�1+'�lY,��*,` lip• r 'i''IiG',r. _ - -- _ ( 1 . `Wr1 '�II '� •J. .i ry" r,l ...:s....:• a. ,pr, , l,r r1''„ VwF�.'', ' ii�' i' publish 10/28/88 an Muir- was= APMM '8Q PJAW189 ff;" R N'8 "PROW OP OMITIONAL V8s �8-*88/ LSvmi x PN81lIT 90. 88--27/ xIW IM is"" �. 88-4iT'2WAT1V8 PARCH VA.P 88-885 1' ( t to to develop a S-Level Parking 6tructure� With S3,073 Boo Feet o!• Gam�rcia]) ri!• +r i R i �41VXx thst the ll+uatingtovi *each City Council will 8ine In the u i i Cher at �the htt tee Beach $000 1�aIn 8t>t"t. ftatingtorl "echo calitorniae on that time indicated below to receive and consider the ail persona wbo wish to be hoard relative to the :. + criNA below* ubada , MV14mbor 7, 1988, :Ild 1q[ Appeal to Planning Commission's approval of Conditional. Use Perolt No. 88-34, Coo*tal D6v4Xopmnt Permit Flo. 88 -27, ZoviiabOWtal Impket saport go . 88-4, and Tentative parcel • • Map Soo 89-385 � 'J•; ``;; I City of hantington Beach Redevelopment Agency c o i unci le Muth Pial ey Southeast of Noin Street - 200 black (bounded by Win 1 7street, malnut hvepluti, Third l8treet and Clive 1► ue) . . — . . � BoMtoan 8pecific Plan District 85 (fixed Use Corrar�r�cof a1�ofli��areideetisl) " jkpoeal . of pl arming Congd as ion's approval of an " ' ,;•;•';. epprozimately 8117 pga,ret, 5-1wmI Vrtkinp structure wlib 32,O73 square feet of commercials and u r0post ' tp CMsolidate 18 lot$ into one lot and vacate an alloy. Covered by Savironmaetal Fact Report Me 88-4 also being appealed and which will `. also be considered by the City Coeuci l. �8 The tsubJ males is within a son-appealable ares mauls A Copy of the proposed request is on file in the I arrtms tt of COMMUnity Development, 2000 male Street,, 0010DOton Beacho California 92648, for inspection by the 1palic. ALL I# BSfaw MUM are Invited to attend said hearing and express arialons or submit evidonce for or ags�nst the application as outlined above. If there ore anxr further qusstioss please call Laura Phillips, Assistant Planter at 536-52111. CITY hN MWI11Q' M SRAM Dotal: 10/27/80 Connie 8rockwal►, City Clark r_r1 -- _ .+ 3_ ' #L61'3'Jif"n Itme-69, I'fT l'EItCfi "'J t ZiMF fq*mAw 11#1 23P ='OiRC���w' _ � :ice CROi` ibk 1 1 '�i E6L`R ` = -TOM AM iRll s ' - i##+134<- a t1rM1« li -I *M OWN�`OR Li#r CAiOii illlli" lCil, CAL Oi6Ai MACII: # ` xJ J ;ano-133-1t ROArt• MUST J Oft-224-07 CAT= MUM" Oti-134-14. TA ONSING ! 1 i4-i3i O am ii1?6 04-03s 42r 6T 44-fif #31 It itT ` - Lo!-AI"Lf#• CA 44R6S Howl LCN. CAL 994AS NOW 14M E a sca-P ca 11440 It#-134-101 rug ! RILEY O 094P-134-00 CAYIC. SNAMO 094-134-1~ Mug Raw*? ' y. 20-935 12783 M aR 04-935 410 MAIN 17 94-033 It" LANAKILA LN GRAND RRACE a CA 91324 'NU##TSN U ACNr CAL. 42646 GWOW a CAL 9"41 0#4-134-02 KOLA LOrl W COOP, 614-234-09 JLiRRO • 9 n 614-134-2v OW MOM L 1sC i4-832 667C AY2 04-833 241 A AVE 44-435 2Qr PLEM11 AYE ' immmT am MACH• CA 92646 LONG ACKr CAL 90003 C LL439 CA • L _ 1 ORA-234-63 •EpE r RVIL 0 Q24-134-10 JLWKaV CH, 9 IF 024-134-1" On AMORE w L in =� i4-+3f X RK LIWJ M 04-03S 241 AVE t4-939 its LETRIE AVE s "91 A LANTA &YE LOW ACH• CAL 9"113 C L LO, d A i101! W~mI TOM MACK, CA 916" vi 0s4-134-04 "MA MQI NDURT i 4,24-134-11 JUM CNP a H 024-134-111 009 BRIM L TO 64-035 It"t AMAKILA LH "-433 t4i A AYE 64-OAS to? LETME AME aARWN GROVE, CAL 92641 LOAM ACH. CAL 9"63 LLO, ILA t M-22*-95 11ANOI ROWWr 024-134-11t Ri'.s CHORLEO 924-234-1- N3. . 3110 US L 64-915 12"0 1LA LN i4-039 umr A "-935 to SALT &U- CM 044M a CAt YE4642 ="1' !Y iML+Lf Taff MA=a !6 1lR�IE Oif AEAZ1. !'.A 42161L6 �' .tom_..•.,-> _._- _` .... $i"`- `r _- - �,` r- _ � .-�� F5 _ � - T 4 .ti _ d '3 { `- _t ut - _ • - _ _ _ _ _ +�� - •T _ Rom . 4.=faits HEM c ii4•����. � �if��l+� = �. _,- "--Vi *3u - m AVII IF ONO!'mow - M�iIA CI T i ti• lli 3 ilor i R <�- -4s fi fT* s nv Lire PT � 4-34�i' 'imp tfty" s ill tip _ SAT LN Oi-7t]i -11=7R t ! aftir tR i opus" om r CAS T TUB CORPOR TI! PILAIA clams CA NEMPORT 6EACds t# !Lill T Get-w-" UT T Ott imp% ' ft-I t-17 RXAV r WIW L -f+k1-i CR!"t i! MtIMT�ItYIN fliCll -- "UGLt3s AR !#O!4 IMTIIIM WHO CAL # 1"Tt ARINM sLVO lltWTJ E tit t. W-I#E-his la1iA1FA in 4S*=442-14 PVP*A&s. sAMRA J&drt#f ULte -� - 06-OU p R 4#3O •04-63E '1" 14 ""Aik OLVO A!-«3s a 141E 3574 k Lilli ACM* to it #€O"i CA 91641 ti. ! vq 3 �Ii • season C Ti!-11' as TO NY K E4t5TAA-Rt4ELir WNT SOW i4�flR ! t?i4l3R 366 i =T ii•!T'! f ,, r ir.. .• . ORAL am* MCA MWT Tip OIACIiy CA it"a I-214- INAAAMR iT"Notumv CA x r7i. 14 US-tt UTUP VILLIAM J i #i tb r C4LCN *VWRR Oti 1i3-1: ■iM VP R RT J uL_14344c iR -4#-!s s86 �_ sT �-013 # l qft i3ia TAM f CAL 'M"ii 111 tt TEiM it ACM s CA 92494 L4 i Alod ti f a la i '�.Ar r � t����fa...'=..}'�:=�IILs".=�' .�=Y.d.�]l'MtA��t__�Et"s`•.i:.s�rai =s. iLIS"- ".a. - `•--�- -_:. _....�-.._____ _ ..__.._--_ - - - _ - _ _ ORT iT tk 01111mms vow logo"" m 4m Nomw U --AM 400FAM r AM 4 ft-41st 74W*MPAW.AWN=-0 t MW At Sol" -6 3T�� Alm , *vw2mTu was, CAL "646 *L low "&CPO th ^S4000M 'MM -WAM .ST .-AWIPm435 P 0 a= 32# ' 04-435 Ash *92 AW 0 !30 RON 24AMm, CA 4COO C& ift" -:944" w"WINSIM amp C&L ga"s 1 A m -oftw3wo-se Si USP JAWS_# OS4-W4-44 APKXTRtr WrAT99 OF Ancitica Sties 145-0 iftoom "Awn "LLINTIM M .411fir-4m P"T OfFIC9 DLDS weivo '- ATOM DrAx"a Cit M647 MUMUNSTON WACR CAL 921kiL6 L*& it wjw 54"Xv CA 1- m IA- 4840445-21 CITT 4W 2ltlNt31WIM MAM 084-1*4-10 PAN*"XMP VALANTIK 494-149-1: LA Mai To 4'�'44 *"35 P-0 us If* S4-63S 31t CifWASO AVE v a-- 4434 M *Zowrd 1"o CAL 9266# RUNTISISTR GCH. CAL 926416 LX1~UM OW Le U DUBM LIE IM "MTT c r.1" mw MWIM 06-03* r .9 sm '1" *4-032 t*222 9*11MAUE Uf off-035 slip 4 Of few"MY" UMS CAL 44," RUICTIMIG..' 'fteACK, CA 926!f_6 lMiigT 11LIAMe CA gap&" Ar 004-40*wU CRILCMv KILLIAN 10 924-1469-2., sills = a 4 4e r stit Im *6-0035 30MUTZ RMASID 04-SIS asU SA AVG 3303-DAmmee" aromy STY CA gem UESTLAIM VILLAS&* CA 91362 It4t cov gun. 1'- • _ __ _ _ _ - - _ _ -- j _ t 41 3.7 jog y - I � 41 f - N1NlT Z -ot�h CA j ft �i,a� 7 Yy� 7 - s mm am An CA 1i WANT MM4 CA 40 NOW CA • -3# fit!!#Eil 4f4RA'4S- $ALA #�1!�EL i4RE!'ll M4'Z �-#' _�i`:' ._g s 39ACIIr -CA !l44i NMM it aKit. CA lt&&& t A • - �`__ JAMS ! K# 3##-t3 PE TE .mil yt N-At3 92a ZEN on /4+4i4E 049 WT R"T OR 04 -f3f Taf--f '#t AUt LA . CA 4iA11 MILL s CA !!i t o MMiE M 4E 8=: C4 III*" jdj;4- OM*-49 MUTE R J TA "4-l4A-i4 id L rlABt? # TA tllELZAM J *%fta" aU #T "-"& t**I ELA PL i -!Ai *04*1 wilff lLAC*a Cat ! A to tiaa• MORUMM IKKo CAL on" 06-21i-sA VAN in Ls JOMDAU It "4-141E-27 1GAT IOATALIF A AE4-i4�-#• !Mt' r A�CCIi S �`�"" tAiol R't!T Ltf 04-0lZ. t18 T ST - APT TOO 619"K r CA I=64-6 11E i43i `- MAL AN CA 9974 A EIIS �. CA "a" aft-W-11 slotCE , MANCIS it TA U*-145-" IIVMA DO MLAS 11 4t4-Z4i- i� M # #. _ R• r`_.=� *4—"1 1of4L 4 C im !4-afA it t AT A4•i]# 34311 AMUM !jo YiLLA . CA 9~ NMI AEACUs CA litr-A Towm. ii famw ' A.ice� • J r - _c _ -af..���_ `I.V. . _ r v _ . r z lw- MAW _ t . '�' �. r"L+I�' �i!! iMWFiI!`lis. #'�.� i." -• -.Mew-►'1�4mm� CA 9"44 wiffa11R p itA 4A8l�3 MIFi M �' ` ��'�r-4T iMMQ'8* SCR A WX*- TT-#3 WJ M .Vo. flblMU 4c*-iiwp- ; - s # � MMT3lIt'4"il +1CIt s c" 03'4i M311iMM WM r CA ltiFf# 4iit'.i'► III 69AMM M i�E`+ RL? 113Llii Ci - �._ "4-144-1! NO=$ t A QCP", 14T- 5 ilALLvmMl' 1UL1.2Pft .# #t4-14ia# • con Pa4mim is 94-03R 3Rl STU t4-Ew its 5Tt1 ST 14-03 p *`"* its a1o4.3+ii-�: TES JGMf! A *24-147-*6 MuLt1ffRs $US" # #i4-Y4j?-#3- lg"& w 22CFAND A #i•A3s 0 !4 279 44-035 xPilenoNs ER lAmo 51 MJWWW Tit BCM, CAL 914" 35S Y23TA dA?A: WWI BMIP40-141ACMe CA 'on" 1f NP4RT SIA[!i r CA 1. A14-346-21 TSM r .iOW A LINDBORC. LFORARD Q oft-147-a 6T« Tom.# A RiS r a ITS 44-OU 17124 NEUVOPlE 3T 94-63S► 953 TEWU FULS W � t Mms IN 8=6 CAL 996" WITS XZ? LA =& WACP. CAL !ram ' f FOUNTAIN YA;LLEY# CA 927IMa tX YfD ! t08#-14i-14 %at JPAWO 7-10 SWA s STLVIA # SM-141-8' -i3A i• � 1NRI!LA AOI fYt i##4 kltL! WIN FtgGTOt # EiRyn"IOMWA�s CA 936 - -•` CA 1E6. 7 LAHiIII" i! P N-144-IS WIL J91t ty C 194-147-11 ASSISTAAM~i LEAGUE OF M-147-M 0iM'!. y1Ar1.l69= T 1M ii•i33 71 1 AMW OR 44-03i mu"T'1MICTml SEACB i4-i33 XIPI 0-014 ISMMi REACJit CA f#444 3#1 gAt,IT iT N lAMREiit �' ' �J"t��- HUNTI�il�M LCH. CAL Ma 4 iriN�i�T4iM IPti#Mr CA gum �,, 1�� _ __ _ - - -- 'r - - '�:-��� `if�: -• __ -" -- -- .`'�'1+. •� --may �aNl_ _#•!;, _ . s .R;- . L J= mm ilk p N -ZIP we F • Xffe", ism Cl 426#i i3 T MltilI i . - _ - G*AWA. CA 4tLi 5 �- - S. kvm- wall MAL _ R" ; Its *WVII#G*M UACK 9 CA U&A i M -467-31 CUPW MMTzMTW9 MIMM 62"41-.36 FuRDA* CALYX* s os�►� � � .� L` _ti,_y 94mon ! 4 wm i4"r34 61 -7"--NlSNMAT I11 -i3s *LA4 Nl4-14T-32 TN11MA. UN ADAK TR aft -i1 f�tCUTT. IIILLE�l1 a &L4-144-44 4W*. #MWUT -4 � ��5-7���► 1 •k—M 33" MG IT #i-435 1i 1 E MAIN 3T 64-035P- am flkaMC23CQ. CA 94207 VENTURA. CA--- _� 438t 1 Li11si . Li VOW � -i�X.. 00*-147-tT VVU*S. JOW A 524-2-4i-02 UNRY. 7MUST J ST . '''R • •4-i3R Sit U&ZM ST 04-535 P it *5474 i4-i3S v 4 aiOC )w;i !lIIIM'f*T" ltAClt CA 99*" Lot s CA "Ot N Lai Ann"Srv,&A011 - ,� Jc iRi-i•"T-i4 TERRY. IL"V*4 = 494-144-03 IEmR3[. ROMRT .7 614-144-V � INN"T J 14-015 TERiEY0 le"AT C 14-E3i f 4 W L,4S1T4 - -A4-035 -r 4 _ *i#4 ti! STS ST _MM MUMS* CA !!Of s Lim i. to NINITIMTH KN s CAL 92648 "1 4K*-24b7-3i TATLM tAML.T TKVW it4-1#t-i4 _ IHWNT i it!-_i4M-1: t,Ai-.WU aiw SHOW INgALTYlj 5Mi3s US TIA' 1NER~ T SEACH CA *ti43 L" ALES. CA lOEl-S '' iiMtn-ita! f - R # i+ iw mum - _ - _ - _ - -- . _- __ .. -� __ _ � _ =�' -i'1. -� -,�.-„_`������ems.- I �o �'t�i_� -.F.' •r _-iOii J�P91 i1L 4 VWI 94-44/4l 3 �iill�i= as" "6gvw 1MMCi i3H VAWL am _40wa! EIJ► FAAKTA.-Ub&v ilmas ZTF _ __VAM4__ . NAME AID saws* COOS TR# it#11t AM ss 4"E !r# — A ;appow -- - #94-340-12 JIIrCMR r WOUS # "4wsjWW :l"lry 4V Fl"614M CEJICi **-iif #N # o i9 ice-434 flW?liii _ 060 s C*3. ftb+Fi 04-03i _IN- Nil1EFIJIiTM 4Ci1 CAL ft 406" 3 `. _ -1iM1# _ r RfIOEiRT J ftA-1i0-1# sii�TE 4W groanIA O#PT -1i3-/.' # Oit r= �'•` ii Is Q 0337# 0#a434k OJ'-U*K KAVIC#S IK-035 �11# - ` � `�t Lfs s. ca :.: ors JtsAJ. E Div U . ca *t464& � .• , '..�-.._ SACRA s CA SIO-144-13 SOUNT's RT 1 094-150-17 STATE O!r ALIfOR-MIA OEPT •s4-1Sl-ii,_.7fN�s O � �_�;' 44-03S P 0 I= 176 "-83f OF "JAE SERVICES 64-035 14961 NAVEfI i31t LOS A"rL C► 99962 RE-at EST I OIV 04&4! GAACN Ca 92641 690 11011E YE SACRAKFtiT v CA 95O25 0E40-1W1i TAIMIiSIAN& PAUL A TO roll*-151-41 SKIM 2 27 L T 01-4-1L1-0+ 3C As MCOML L 94-03# 1164 9 SOMOMA QO 04-OR1 2&15' E AN BLVO 04--als 11s ST AILTAS! iiA• CA 91541 `AIBPA,- gtAAl 1uE. -&4AC Iv- to M-14 -19 !NANO! VLv7 � 524-1&1-42 AOV1r CM US F TO 424-I53-1-c S14701I F&ANCIS i � 04-035 00E1 OWLE 04-Aii 14291 S ARCREEK LN 04 -S3f ET MUMTZMTOM DE a CA *a"? rAtualTo CA V4701 *TS,#p-_� • itEm UL11! u t t IT'S. CA "tu Ssb4-14R-Jtlt arm r PIAKCE a R 324-191-45 K ki JORN F •Sri-151-2 1 KIT .80NIMI t Tit ; t"35 s1=i 10TM $1 04-001 2704 A 9T 04-1101 8931p VISTA SO WA WV4CA* CA 1"93 altsmsE, A f;66S v lw&s- i �4-1 Oi P�At3,�TN JOW TR NEST MALTY it4-231-45 #SWKA I STIM167s #t4-Yii-A'� ' ° r•� r l4-4>0, t0 6"35 Xy i !E ITT 04-001 >J s "My XCORP TAX ME 0199-A 1=! an 1 2415 a� NO P O WN 90-97 Ti K Nt1rITsiIC WACN CA 92647 P r Cl 941i4 ` '4 LOS ANULILS. u► 9i9Jcs t � . - r-r-77'7 arr�t� �e-cTi "W 11w s ?` cs"Poaznsl- vow", &€w- TOi MAID me- xftftgvill� VoW vft ! me Amenew W =- *tW"* - � - -s�' c raeoc� aa�i�e T: f Z4Tf "y no 04-sue 12T TN: sm Cif COMM- Cat Vtoltv �R-3 •RT Me dill` stM aft-Tat-!!i fiMft, KMMAIIT is WuNcT w* ;- fk-<� i�4aO 07EYAIkT crR ai-�� � � Rosl:�tt� a �-� �IiTOM DLL T= FOUNT K VALCtYs CA 4tI"Oi 333 CSC CENTER ON NEST SAWA AHA s CA 'FE 3'03 "Off CA ftt*b f'R4-151-tO !AY 01L CO 014-152-66 01lOpumnO. ST T R TI! 024-1f3- ': r 04-M SIN 0 SHIRE IAVD 04-834 ii?� LANGWR A" fi00 04-@34 CITfi ;m4K gib! sulim' 0 1f" "WSJ CA T1*04 14" r _ LOS LE S. CA 90 010 wrim s. OIf Gn CA MAii" -193-1A* !AV- OIL CO atf-iSt-It CRACCA OLDS ERAIMi if TR 010-113-am- l�L,� • 9091NV L Tit 04-#a3 Sue N tilling OLVD 04-034 19pit 1ET DAY LM O4-834 "-ft . 0E-311 IKTE i NURTI TOIL BEACH. CA 4EGAi !j!vwm sA 9"40 -= LOS Ur. CA 90034b AL Ir F Oft-M-41 M TKT IWIRLIT D O24-1st-12 i1m ARM A Ott-153-0:- MAN 000"D A #4-034 iOl 1 ST O4-634 301- Ii ST 04-030 It I IN= IT, a. kMUMTI ON SEAL`M, CA #24" IIWT2 OR BEACM, CA 1264-0 itllml"To1 -,4AGNs CA ' O16-lOR-02 TXARPP TANFORD 624-152-12 dL4 1[ A at4-153-0-- IIDLLIIPMs *MY T `r i4-OS4 IM i Mot 04-034 t*1 S T 04-034 111 MAIN IT dM Ma CA 9134O lI1Il1TIMS DEAC!!s CA 9:64•6 nuffinal" EEi s CA ift" 804-SliO-03 R1 m MOMENT CORD bl4-1'si-13 CITY OF lMlrGM BEACH ft4-193-4+- ASSIMMs iCMPM 0 04-i34 It 0 a 404• 54-034 p a tax lTa 94-034 XJ%CK W --Qh-SKIT NYNTZ OM 69ACKs CA V4462 IIi1N1 KNs CAL Ttfs-D I1 Is WISIil MUMTIIIRTOU DRACV• CA 124" '� - 1�i.. ANC ii# C TIghle AID'=: ' ids 'Willi 4i•il4 fi 1!l 660i3A<= its mawsl t� 1 iAi` 99" uWalmols SCR. CAL !#is# iv i" !ii calrAL M Avg ! 16344 Ott PAR LJ1 0"3+4 269ft -IMM UAL m um t 9A !l744 MMTZMT40 44 ACit o CA t li 3".. # 14M EMCimp CA Utz* !si- F3- ♦' E 4lIWXs AA * RAC- a -i44-3i3-14 •A'i�11Ta JACK i 3 3 A t�► �ptii M-4a4 p a WX its i4-s3* X OAIIO! f4-!]� swifto - •AIICM 4AWA FE, CAL 1tfi7 113 MIN 164we 1N` -!L" mm"IEN" CA I261LA IENCUNB* to !'Liii -: 4i 7�#3-lY a AlglAa 4t4-=l;-lf A110EU1ITIa An*" "Ann !t Ti#-2ii-l. GAlf B AO CLVW LS 04-M 313 P4 T 2*-934 XJJWKS SWPSQA"S 44-474 394 Baum an it09TUOT ACM!f CA 92446 lI3 IIAIN AT N!Wfsm8* Y-"Aimf CA 926" PMOTINCTAN bR ACK f CA 9264 A 414-323-14 LMTI. LIMA* kAMO 424-194 -61 ZRIDAMe AUL FMTAFA 424-164-#1 Ai! 1"m or • B _ 84-i34 113 44-434 lA3At lTT1rASON LM !! ii-!34 1!3 !T �= NY14T=MiTON s CA !S4l8 111ilf13N�TOM btJ�E:B, CA l2��4 qb =M#7it ESL !!ii# JOL :_ s44-343-lS 2=zmv�OWTA" " SPAWD SM-234-#! �tAGEM9 CRARLEA iti-li#-!• zE 44-i� MOM, SLANCAM A 04-o" li lit PA Ali !tCA 9"48 161 SIR sT HU41rU iT4ft EEi C4 Ift*& . ., 1EIq+ITINATOM WACIIo t 4o lti4i # = gas-Awl W ITT AGCWT W 02*-214-f3 TAYLOR, #ARCIE J 4t4-1E4-19 It AM MO:TA,#A AW C31T ilv TOM "AM #4- A tt! VIA 3AN OLHO !4-l3; 18342 . 3 Stli L1� at 444i 11AL1 �1t NEWNT WKNo CA 9EB63 i1UNT1�Td, CA I""* . - - it i � \ vzw A -2.�r.:•�• y kz Alw - 9z• - - _ l- _ _ _�F�� - w•- `_'X"''` '• mac _ - •lb Jtlttt' A_ Ink �- - ILYi 1 . • `i� a7 2 . > ' 3� U IN 4- a4 :a@*" 60 t: Y1_ tr # a4-034 NEE ,-_ " lRifi it - �•� x �.� �« ��� " lMif 6. am p a_a+iac- � �'� � Cif �pIC=t10: CA 117i3d � f t CA- 949tt • ; >~ r = , - %a 2 `g i M*►13 itP^�QiM 29URTS * atma 1*-04 3a.'imit 44*1310 .-PafftEl TAX -DIT u f;�X RT 2*&bi U11A aLlEi iNlliT1 4; P Cad - F twolmip CA 4143i !RN SCD9 CA "Itf - *"-1i4-14 IM44romia !1!mys 424-35hi7 MOWING MACH go QfZ4-1*z-t. &&me i in i4-+l34 4Y 84"f3i -FRQP"T TU WV 64-a3i as 14 _ iAI Aif A 01" Res aT 1116ya QF CA f1i3A iPAN iOR�� CA #isFO � #3L aa4 ;k - L #a4-354-!D CALIX,100141A RESORTS at4-14*-63 HICCOL!. HICkAf L it s a14- fat-3t.• t1�T , +tl1l9i ! '' 04-634 iuIT! 03 44-4133 4120 3RD SI' H-#�f 30� � !� r -- •4� 364916 4 9LVD - a&,WTIVOYN IWO, CAL oft4s Ukr- iT=- EACH. CA 126"EW.1100 CA _ ot�� �e�aoRTa ae+- -a� r�Lt�s . -i1 tTa +� , fa��at-�� • �sT1�� t t��tL _" _ -- ='+ .-' a;am 3�I talli�� "S f IP9iA AFT 24 04-011 R;!4A asrtft Sirliiia tVpA *Lila f.Ya USP CAL %af f 4-F~ 0 US CA Eact"s 91436 8&4-124449 aAca cc 4--141-4i f r1s• aafs i 3:4-149-O. "Lt •tLSM 1! TIR _ 94-4" pom t TAX 04-a3a 332 gm aT 04-E34 33;71 L rAM?fa �- 8 MMIJWQN M ACb O- c+► spat-r •4 HIM U'.- Ga �s - 3L !a 18COr CA "Iti .._ fi E_.-=��r__ _-__ __ _ —___—_ � 6t4'.-•e t.�..•..r-, _•_art•-. =•J.•..-<Z�7•.---•• --. .... -__ -. --__L-a`' __ _ -_ __ ___�_ _ _— _- _ _�_. _ _ - _ . c- - - - --- - - - - T- 7 . **oust "-al-M 9:t2 C:9 1966-69 CITY10I3TF.ICT PARCEL L23T PAU 116 -Pont _054A HUNTIN47001 BEACH CI rf owmao ZIP PARCEL NO/ Oiltl Rs Zile PARCEL NO.' 4RnECs XZr A #SAW AM ASS ZOai TRA NAME MW AOGRLSS CODE Ii�A JIAftf A" ASORISS CODE �M"�OS•iS KANALD 1 084-262-59 C,ATKE s CRARLES E 0024-Ir=-1s PALMIR• PAUL I 831 ST 04-a3f 2242 O&M SEACH SLVO 04-035 14:23 E FLMMR 82 IWNf�2 SCNi CAL 12640 LONG EACS, CA 94306 i,HIT?I_R. CA 9"03 *4-lil-03 TOM XAJkflLD E •024-161-12 LINRB RS. LEONARD 0 9991-169-17: MCSINDEI. CAROLIP S an !31 ST 04-035 17220 NEMNOPE 3T C*-935 2 a 0Qx 167 ! IifE0T2 SCHs GEL 92440 SMITE 227 212 =N9 3T -- FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92703 MU.iTIN-STH. NCIf �iL 1�Y660 C=4-169-04 6ALKIN Jam A 0024-162-13 WALLACE, GRE40Q&TH I TA 024-162-1 + PARNAK. N. JGHA 04-433 103 IM0<TON ST 04-03S bet CALIFO9NIA ST C4-035 20i LA ZT w 19T N iCBa CAL 9264B RUNTINGTON 69 ACH s CA 92646 HUNTIN H DCH, CAL 92 E 3 M-L6S-03 MMLET #MY ETTA *024-162-26 RESENDEZr CAROLINI 3 024-162-2•• YANIAN GENIVYIVE TR 91 84-033 38607 1K CT 04-035 22z 2NO 3T 04-035 7T#Jktg 0021'13 3WAR VALLEY, CA 9270a P 0 BOX 167 24:5 K KILWORTH 4VE MUNT-- STN BCKp CAL LOS AN LZ3, !'A 90039 $2010-162-96 DONUT MART IT'A 4024-162-17 LINo• CARMEL A 024-161-2:• I4UNldI Ta PAY " TR 0 •S13 10147 AIM CT 04-035 S;Gy KE3AGROVE AVE 04-035 F 0 a ' 34 EalA1TA 9ALLE 1, .:A 92709 RHITTIER, CA 90dt I MO:kit no CT, 15714 0E4-I*I-07 sawr, Y ETTA 0 024 -161-14 RE LAPPb iOR00R at4-3d3-0' CI fY t Nt1?I1 IIdErTQ4i uACIS M-OM 10"? IN CT 04-035 320 JOLIET ST 04-C34 P j a 6 190 fouw VALLEY. CA 92706 HOKTINGTM BCH CAL 9264a HU'AT_ GTV BEN, CAL 92640 GLTNIK: ►ES E 0924-162-29 REDMAN. JAMS J 9 024-I63-0. NOLNERIDA. THOMAS M-036 31#i L KACh SLVO 04-03F 43646 N CEDAR 04-034 6734 MILLPA&K OR LOW s CA 90806 LANCASTER r CAL 535::4 Lai ANGILES. CA 99666 s - ,. fttt !M L1"-Ct CITYnZATRIC7 PARCEL L13T 1 I114M EIAM CYTT rip FAMEM Not jam"ERS till, PARCFL MO.' O1lt1ELS ZIP -� _ 30r4t3 m! .'AA M1tiME AND ADDRESS CODE TEA IiAII AND AMRAAE CdPt E 0t4-261-t4 CATHE : CHAPtES E *i24-162-Ra VALNER, PAOL q 04-03.5 2t9t DOW WACH OLYQ 44-615 1412% F 'LOIAR 82 !hL 92440 LCI� IACS CA 10806 WITTIER. CA t0663 -- E- 44t4--lit-1! Ll"06E C. iEdtiARD d RESt DLL, CARGLIl1 6 - ZT 64-033 172t0 lammor! ST 04-035 P O BOX 167 � ame CAL 19648 SUITE 127 1122 END S7 L . iGUHTAIN YALLETp CA 32706 NUATIN67N 1![H�' 0lAti I . A 4024-142-13 WALLACE @ ONEHCOLTH I TR Qx4-162-2 PARNAK It, .#DAN T" 5I 04-433 50Z C4LIFORMIA ST 64-G33 204 LA ST ZMr CAL 126" ULWINCTOIl DEACN, CA 126+4a HWwTIN it", CAL 92446 l, i-L6A- 90d,6PT IEAOY ETT• 0924-ICZ-16 RESrh0lZ9 CARGLIN 3 GE4-1lt-Z-- YLNIAlt SENlYIEVE TR 81 **-am 369*67 - it CT 04-035 222 2H0 ST 64-035 XT#JkFS OOALAS VALLEY• CA 1270a P C BOX 167 2415 K PlI LWORTH %V1 HUAIINGTH b0f, CAL 4264a LOS A E LES, CA 190136 i 941"T MMY ITTA "24-142-17 LING, CARMEL A 024-142- 2!- "63"I TT, OA)' A TA r/' 0 T # IN Ct 04-033 S404 MESACROVE AVE 04--035 R O 6 234 4.6M VULET• CA 92706 UNITTIEA, CA 4061-2 hDAU t . CA %9710 r� 8*6-la!-67 IWNMVD ATTA 4 024-162-14 DE LAPP, GORDOH OZ4-26]-0' CI fT F IfLoHl INGTOR BEACH 94-t30 1"61F - CT 0:4-03S 320 jGLIET ST 04-0341 P v a x 1%0 PST Y"LZT& CA 12708 HUNTINGTH 50to CAL 42648 KU'iTl GTH IK H, CIL 1>f648 f. CATMlty ARLE3 I s0t4-169-20 REDMAN& JA1lES J 6 024-14o3-0• HOLMEADA. THOMAS # / tit WAC* DLV9 04-635 43646 N CEDAR @4-634 4736 MULPA&K DA Lm CA 90606 LANCASTERP CAL 435::4 Lai AN ELES, CL 90068 i t , � m art s *6-61-" 9tt! PM 1"8-89 CITYf02STRICT PARCEL LIST SAS! I# -rr '-'6fttW&f MIS02 OMA *U$ff3N9TOIR BEACH CITY VIM& NOV Di1MR$ ZIR PARCEL NOf QImjr3 2IP PARCEL MO: sumps ZIP Ift HAWMW ADDRESS CONE TV4. MArt AIM AGORISS CODE T6A XA.VW AMC A49"SS CODE -L# 41 COMM 3PWCIALTIES 1424-245-09 OFR1Gg. CHARL25 A P824•-265-lam "ASOtt. DERHARQ Tit lf6 NO. t 04-135 222 349 ST 04-83"S 613 3YTN 3T E 1� !f fl HURTimarm SLN: CAL 9Z546 14Ul4TlttGT4lI LEACRl. CA 9rb66 F ! AVE �iiN!• CA 92666 #006%.0 4.1.6 f ST SPECIALTIES 1324-165-10 F' l EVF.Ii J!Y Jati-l4S-ig DAVIDE. DEuty a w" iROJ6CT ! at*-033 2700 6R1'A 0 820 04-035 r 01 Sax 362 I Ina ! * M FULLEitiUM. CA 9263S HUNTINGTON I LACN, CA 92449 L3S E CKA Vie 011116E, CA SE666 `Ilt*-US-S! EAYMNs CMARLRS I 1014-16S-11 PEt%l..- TEVEN .SAY POE4-I65-IV STA;NE. ANTRONT R M-13! U92 LIM KAN BLVD 04-81S t790 BREi'lUk 0 t4-31S 211 tND ST LNM6 ltASIR, CA 90806 FULLEf!' aN, CA � 42635 KtfNIINGTON SEACK. CA 92648 .lam-us-03 P<L lgVE!! JAY 1094-16S-t ' HSJEH. RONALD 1024-145-2r fafERKC. TONr 84-43a 2760 3mm VO *a* 0�4-a3S 7121 STat"Dob DR b4-O:y I i. 2"D ST EgiLtMTOMf t 42635 HUNTINGTONBEACH• CA 9Z6&7 r',?iTINGTam uucst. CA tr646 �;^24-365-E6 M+ATRZNMe, RUSSELL LEE l024-=65-13 "A4wt, SERKARC TR 1924-16S-2: j0#KSaN. ROCE9 A 44-036 SPAC! Elf 04-035 82S K ST 04-53S 211 2140 ST _ H851 fEIRAN1 ST HUNTING BEAM. CA 92643 HUUTIMGTON EEACN, CA 9t643 WJ@flMiTON BEACK, CA 92644 ` it �lii•Oi' Olexi0• JOYCE M 1024-165-14 11ASOMm BERMARD TR jl14-165-2 400021CH , ROBERT S if #-43S t3I OLIVE AVE 04-33S aZ5 12 T H ST O4-015 r 13 SOX 369 'l wimil61n4m "AM, GA 926,18 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92Sf a "UHTINCT'3N LEArr'Me! CA •t648 r. r it#-362w68 .ALL N& 10i6RT 2 J024-163-2i RIJ:KKE . ROBERT A P24-16;-t? NE CSER. .Jost Ph J N�61i S A 10OX 610 84-033 E16 WALNUT ST 64-035 Ytl END ST M%T!!9S"1'OiT 21ACN. CA 92648 HUMINGTON BEACH, CA 924L6 HURTIN6TON EEACH. CA 92644 i - i _ ti, a. . lam #IL 0094M& iw-u-m# 1=t= pn 19"-69 CITY/DISTRICT rpAUL LIST pm Z" 4 3 fWi WWIDiTW MACH CITY V&fwL ow ilk ZIP PARCEIL Mal ONMRS zip PARCEL NO." oamwa Up llAm ARMS as COQE TRA HAM AN* ARORESS CODE TINA KAng AM ARDUSi t3K 7fW-"9-!f 111N M9z- A dg4-166-06 CAL1FC"IA NISOITS INC 1524-164-1`= cfwt-@v MMTINiTON pEAcm us- 104-014 SUITE 1 1 04-634 f O S t MM Wks CA i1648 16009 YEN A BLVO AUHTINGTH o CAL 4ti48 ENC21009 CA t1436 e `4•3# 1 RICE# MARC i •14-166-57 K-W!OfFE, !!!LEl# T 824-171-0' "u-173 TOK E1ACA COMPANY iM Sti we of 04-634 OSEPIAPt, ECHARD i4-935 ?R?Pt TY TAX RfS11iZM1P iEiCN, CA 92648 iTi• PARK ST P 0X 7631 HUH1ING7N OCHm CAL 92648 3A:i F ANCI3C0* CA "Its •iRRy-3ii-i1 to A RNSORTS INC f 0?4-'66- b CA R 17M ONIA RESORTS INC 0t4-171-0. NTT TON f-EACM CO 04-634 SuITS 3 44-034 SMITE 01 04-033 PagrE TY TAX 163" OLVO 16090 i -URA SLVD ! 0 O X 7611 R#IC.::�O• CA 91434 EH%IflD: CA 91436 SAN f ANCISCO, CZ 941#A tMIA RE20R72 ZWC 1014-16i-09 CAL RNIA RESOR73 INC 0tf-lTl-O:• HUNTZ OTON MACH CO } �3c iM=T! 04-034 7UIT! I 04-033 VROPI TT 7AK 166" VtMTmA 16000 VEH A SLVD � 4 a X 74l3 ltwl---W CA 91436 ENCIRC, CA 91436 SAN E ANCISLO, CA f42t9 }ilk-t1W►-lS Ci Ia us"T'B =NC 1014-164-10 CALIRIA RESORTS INC Ot4-171-0t• KU4TI TON OEtCR COnPANT P 04-034 i 4AM •3 Q4-934 SUI TE �01 04-035 PRIPE T'A TA}: ZiRii WA eLYO 16000 VfLglA RLYD r ;J 6 x 7412 ElIC3liO� 91436 ENCIND CA 414—a6 SAN T ANCISCO. CA 94210 i=4-lib-04 C+L"KIA RESORTS INC CALKFDRNIA RESORTS 024-171-6 Pii7ERS M, 'A K WS34 an 2 04-034 SUIT IlO1 04-933 614 NA N aT X6!09 A iL1f8 16400 TUAA aL1I8 H[lNTIN :PM E-E/LCRa CA 1184! CNCINQ� CA ':3!36 ENC- 'tr C 914-56 f'c' 44%-146-i3 A iI s"T* INC 1414-146-11 CALIM!tNIA RESORTS 424-1T1-0 • KUHTI TON EIACM CC - N-l34 !01! 8! 04-034 Si�ITE 1 1 94-033 PROPS TY Tit): _ los" A iLVB 16000 1lEI1 dLVO P a x 761) EMC 0 LA 93436 EtiCZHO, E;A 114::i SA 4 E AlitlO[O. =A 44if�f CIL $mil i". %.1-" 9=22 PM 19"-84 CITYIDISIRICT PARCEL LIST P•� 4#T m7ftor i111NOER R =4okv* UIIN i IMT011 BEACH CITY "max PIAKft ov 2I 13 Zir. PARCEL NO/ Owings ZIP PARM NO:' DYH!!!1 ZIP - M Ifs AM AQrIlRES! j1Z TEA iJA,MI ARID ADDRoSS COVE TRA MAIN Am LOW fss COW 01I24-963-63 /lCss WNW IDA - 124-163-14 FEASEr ARYET 0 4`914-264-3 COL#. atemI4 06-4310 4404 LEXIM 010 RD 2JACK-I -THE-502 INC i4-s33 446 ST 0o1113Yi CA 98241 P O Box 763 HUNTINi 11 a CAL 9`26" SAN DIE 0r CAL 4231g 4Z4'i63-" MAW ST SPECIALT'LES 2624-163-01 :OHNSON. HAYVAR:j C JR 1024-166-aa• "AURI. JOSEPlI A Ir 434 PROACT 2 04-0:sS 710 24TH ST Ca-035 11? VIA TOLUCA x1tom N M HUNTIMSTa11 BEACH, CA 92640 SAN CLEPIENT! . CA l26T>E 63; E AVE 0lAI�s #26lff IM-!63-09 PtCX, IDA f 024-164-32 BEAT, RAYMOND FIIAMKLIH ♦024-364-6- 30'1TItUEST AIR BALANCE "-034 "04 LL NGTON RO 04-035 6341 HAMUFH LN 04-D35 COMP QOliq!!!9'� 10242 HUNTIMSTOM BEAM CA 92666 20101 CRAUti R LH Kt:mtz"13Z0" SE.""o CA 996" 094'-163-I9 Sp"m AUCE E /024-164-03 4SWPlAHo GEJRGE /214-344-1e MVS. CAIRMEL Oi•-634 952 NARILTOW ACRE 04-033 3174"�ST 04-033 340- NESAGROY= AYler'' PALE! ALTOr CA 94301 HUlfTIHST . CAL 9264.5 WHITTI CAL 90601 i OW-3471-11 "4011E1lr RICIUAD EDUARD /024-164-04 PERRY, DONALD fI 1024-164-1: CELLAWD, DAMS .: l4-l34 %#" PACIFIC AVE 8304 DA-033 313 ZKO ST 041-P35 O4Lt COUNTRT CLUB DR SM 3XiMC1sCOr CA 94109 HUXTINCTH BCH, CAL 92616 BUIEMA PARK s CA *9G22 41E0-343-3t W.LSW* ALLEN L 1624-164-05 WHITE . MARTHA E LIIAbE 7N J024-164-1: TA f LOR. CYN1 NIA 4 94-434 PIECKs R0 JMIL IDA 04-035 309 2ND ST 04-+035 21.7 VIA SAN WInO 9404 L!XlNiTjcw R0 HUNTINGTON EEACH. CA 9269a HI;NPORT BEA[•H. CAL 92l63 946W[T• CA 90241 - F 990+I63-13 ILL ALLIIK L 1024-164-66 9 P SUILOINC EWERPRISES �Z4-164-1• YLON. CYNTHIA Gv 14.13ib P2CKa BA 04-03S INC 04-033 2! _ BAN! RIM 649% Laxismue RO 7266 -ILDINGER SUITE It XtupOi?71 f il, CAL 44663 � 80 MY, CA #0t41 HUNTINGTON 99ACB, CA 92647 � 1• occvwt Occupant 114 ri street ISA Main Straet 121 main Etra�nt tlt511*0 ftat8r, CA 92648 %ik -Rufttlnjton boach, CA 92641 '� Huntington 'Lath, CA 92648 esp p9 Occupant 123 Taro stv"t 1` 127 Main Streit 203. gain Street. Otrti' -Wtan t chi CR 92648 Huntington react►, CA 92648 Hvintingtorz 8iach, CA 92648 Occup&nt Occupant Occupant 203 Mail Street 205 Main Street 207 Main Street pmt. vjv on 8ait~h, CA 9264i9 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Huntinc tor• Beach, CA 92648 tm *nt Occupant Occupant Wa Street 211 Mata Street 213 Main. Street J"tington Reach, CA 92646 Huntington reach, CA 92648 huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,Occupant Occupant Occupant 115 Main Street 217 Main Street 224 Main Street W."tington beach , CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92b48 Nuntittgtor. Beach, CA 92648 Ot'tupant Occupant Occupant 223A Main Street 303A Main Street 305 Main Street ftntinSton Bfath, CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Occupant Occupant Occupant 207A Main Screti 316 Main Street 228 Main Street 4uhtin8ton Beech, CA 92649 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Huntington. Brach , CA 92t48 jtcupant Occupant Occupant 6 maim Street 224 Mein Street 222 Main Street Iurrtington beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Hunt:ngt:on Brach , CA 92648 1totier Occupant 1 .0 ,111n Street 218 Main Street tit .0t~eri Bcach 'A 92648 Nvnt ingtun beach, CA 92648 �\ ant Occupant _ • • •. it sgroor 212 Main Street , . ~ `• ran 00�4* rA 9244# lfuf. -Jmikr n 94ach, CA 92648 i+ cafe Occupant Occupant °' a�tn 8te4tt 204 Main Stzeet 202 Main Streit Awgtea Soacho CA 92648 Mtdntin#ton Teach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach* CA $2648 �F .,4- y' 1 A'4haJ�,`Y _. ► �yoil" mpdb upar,c occupant Occupwic 126 Maim Street 124 Main6trest 12? !fain Str,:et Wdar.tnston beach . CA 92648 �.Auntington Beach, CA 92648 '4 Huntington 36ach, CA 9264P Occupant Occupan+ occupant 120A Maio; Scree! 312 walnut 301 Walnut Nut nj;toA Beach, CA 92648 Huntington !leach , CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 mcVpant Occupant Occupant4 217 Walnut 216 Walnut 718 Walnut Huntington Beach . CA 9261.8 Huntington :beach , CA 92648 Huntington ?leach . CA 42645 dtt'apant (Occupant Occupant 211 Clive 303 Third Street 223 Third Srreet 1 ritin►gton Beacht CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington► :leach, CA 42648 'Iktupan_ Occupant Occupant 721 Third Srreet 115 Third Street 118 Third Street A Huntington. Beach , CA 941648 Huntington Beach , ;'4 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 t atcupant Occupant Occupant ; i22 Third Street 124 Third Street 220 'Third Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Huntington Beach . CA 92648 M1 Xcuprnt Occupant Occupant 010 Third Street 214 Third Stree � 218 Third Street Munting,ton Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beacn . CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 91UEy8 OCCupant Orcupant Occupant 222' 1'411r4'S►treet 2�4 Third Street 226A Third Street l4t$rrjt0o Beach . Ca 92648 Huntington Brach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 upNnt Occupant Occupant 128 Thud Street 301 Third Street 306 Third Srreet luncinItonr Beach . CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 IJ ,I y, I h l yy11�o a i ti air t Lop$ Moth. NUIIt opm f s■d,CA f �r ` N � elo ment Group� Coastal Development p 1234 Sew farer Street Ventura, CA 93001 J �' " 353 FIRST CLASS MAIL. �. IIIIIIIII�IIIIIII'111�11'�IIIIII �� CA u ' :� •'1 , r ACo _ Merle E. Cade � 70 8331 bQjMj Aven e , Cuat'R Midway City, A 10w655 a q— FIRST CLAIM MAIL a.. r OWL Lmommova Book CA aq; y . • g1 t�t�►ro��e Toro, Z� gg630 Ca r f Nt �d 3/314/671 RETURN FIRST CLASS MAILNOT DELJVERABLE PISc^ ` 8�t4 r 1 1� Ai,.A. , 9 r•, 4 � ' + `A E Y" ' !R~eNl iRf ot��r owift IN , wmiam A. Ch:iCuf.t �lillM�p 1343 Cam va Itoad i� hl(bi iye taa�ca �1i11a�e, CA 91382 ��: Ali U���,�:t:�'!]• �.Iii x���3lt• N TO NO t='�1 Zk"fkL):i.NG ORDER ON 1='�l.rr y, n. �. r "Waj&dd L.6m 1 Pursuant to Nesoiu;:: oll Nu . 5335, they staff requests a waiver of the insurance requirements for photographic services . AROMEWAWMON: Staff recommends the City Council approve the request for a waivsr of the insurance requirement pursuant to Resolution No . 6835 . Staff is requesting a waiver of insurance requirements pursuant to Resolution No. 5835 , based can the limited exposure or the Consultant to potential liability problems and the size of the contract (Attachment 8) . purther, the Consultant possesses automobile liability insurance, and a $100, 000 business liability- insurance policy at the residence/office of the Consultant . Also, there are no employees retained by the firm and the Consultant agrees to indemnify the City Consequentlr, the City Attorney has reviewed this zevuest and along with staff recommends that Council accept the Consultant ' s insurance and waive thfi 4rasurance requirements pursuant to Resolution 5835 for this project * 6 Redevelopment Agency Funds , Bond Proceeds Account No. 812645 . ALIMMIZE • i Deny the request to waive insurance requirements . 1. Resolutik z go. 5835 MA•RL• gbm �r •aiw. i ��i/d9 �2- ( 1450d) i , I , w . I LY J r d I EI w } F ,Y RESOLUTION NO. 5835 ! A f BSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1 LUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING CONTRACTORS AND PERMIT.' AYrLICANTS I.NSURANrE AND INDEMNITY REQUIREMEFTS WHEREAS , there are persons and organiWations performing services for the City (herein as "contractors" ) , and permit applicants who are engaged in various activities in the City all of whom subject the City to possible liability for damage to property and injury to persons; and The City desil•es contractors and permit holders to maintain insurance naming the City , its officers , and employees # as additional insureds; and The City desires to require' inciemnificatioji ; V contractors r and permit holders; NOW, THERIEFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, that the insurance coverage and f, indemnity required of all contractors and permit holders , other i than design . engineering consultants , who are engayed in various activities in the City which subject the City to possible liability, shall be as follows : 1 . COVERAGE REQUIRED ■ IW A. General Liability . Combined single limit bodily injury, and property damage including products/completed operations j; liability and blanket contractual liability: Minimum limits of one million dollars per occurrence . If coverage is ' provided und*r a form which includes a designated general � ., atggtegate limit# the aggregate limit must be no less than -1- 583c W 1 i twice t►:e occurrence limit . In the evenc of aggregaiCe a policy coverage , the olic holder will endi-avor to give the � 9 City notice of any known depletion of limits . Claims ! made goliciea are not acceptable . Self insured retentions are acceptable upon approval of Risk Manager . B . WORKERS COMPENSATION Workers ' compensation and employers ' .liability in an amount of not less than $500 ,000 bodily injury by accident, each accident , $500 , 000 bodily injury by disease each cemployee, $1 , 000 ,000 bodily injury by disease, policy liMit, as approved by Lhe City Attorney . C. i)ROFESS10NAL LIABILITY INSURANCE AND WAIVERS 1 . Contractors providing professional services to the city shall be required to provide evidZnce of professional liability insurance in appropriate amounts and coverages as required by indivtdua7. contract . Z , Waivers cf the professional liability insurance may be granted in appropriate cases . Contractors -Iasiring a wi' iver shall submit an er.,nlication for to the City -Attorney. The appli.catibn shall )e reviewed and granted or denied by r : the Claims;-gettlema.it Committee . ApplI cations shall cohfsi n tk. 011 ,�-xing information: A description of work to be performed. 'fh4 obrt of ,public li";3iltty insurancA. Th* availability of Insurance to Coneultant . Th* claims history of proposed contractor . -2- 5835 Ilk 4Y.4 2 . CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE AND ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENTS Evidence of i.nsuranc.p coverage and limits required by the Cityshall be furnished to the %Cit. on the "Accord" or Y similar form . Certificates shall be aNproved by the City Attorney prier to commencement of any work or the issuance of any permit . A separate copy of an endorsement to each contractors, liability poli.y naming the city, its officers and employees as additinnal ;insureds shall be provided to the City Attorney prior to any payment to contractor . Endorsements and cftrtifi.cates shall provide for a 30 day written notice of cancellation of any coverage to the City . 3 . INDEMNITY Contractors and permit holders shall be required to indemnify City, its officers and employees from liabili.*y , arising + ram thei. t negligence or willful misconduct . A copy of the City 's current indemnity agreement is attached as exhibit "A" . TIhe form of such agreement may be.., revised from time to time by the City Attorney in confornancE with state or court decision without revision of this resolution . Each invit-ation to bid shall include the City Attorney 's latest approved form as a. part of the bid package . 4 . DESIGN BNAItiE?RINC CONSULTAt4TS - EXEMPTION Design and engineering consultants are exempt from the i. insurance and indemnity requirements of this y°esolution. lnjurance and indemnity requirements for desicrn and engineering consultants are covered by a separate resolution of the Council. " 3- 5835 J „ �1 W""to I" • Y PERSONS AFFECTED Any F' or organization anization who contracts with the City or who � fmake applicatton for any building peirmit , overweight permit , public Rtreet, public park or public beach use . or any miscellaneous use of City buildings or, other property or who provides an+• goon or service whatsover, to the City, is required to comply with the requ?remeats of this resolution . RESOLUTICL4 NO. 4337 and all other RESOLUTIONS in Conflict herewith are hereby repealed. , PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City -Ccouncil of the City of Nuntington :5each at an adjourned regular meeting thereof , held an the ,y7th day of March J988 Ma ter '�.�.. A TEST~: y City Clerk jPPJtq4D AS TO CONTENT: APPROV D AS TO FORM: ty Administrator City Attorney }!' APPROVED, INITIATING DEPAXTMENT: ' '1G &TWor PUB LIC WORKS i PAO"„ 4 waft M1 yk•�y,m � 7OR 1 ! 14W , EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 5835 A REISOLUTroN OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF HUNIINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING LONT.RACTORS AND PERMIT AMiCANTS INSOR•ANCL AND INDEMNITY REQUIREMENTS INDEMNI.,CAZION.1 nEFPENSF , HOLD HARMLESS CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to protect , defend , indemnify and hold and save harmless CITY , 4_ts officers , and employees, against any and all 'lability , claims , judgments, costs and lemands , however caused, including those resulting from death or injury to CONTRACTOR 'S employees and damage to property , arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken by CONTRACTOR, or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR , including those arising from the passive concurrent negligence of CITY , but save anu except those which arise out of the acLive concurrent negligence, sole negligence , or the sole willful misconduct of CITY , CONTRACTOR will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense . Aril, costs of defense or attorney'rs feels incur-ed by CITY in enforcing thi3 oblf•lati.on will he reimbursed to CITY by CONTRACTOR, or may be awarded to CITY by a court of competent Jurisdiction as costs pursuant to California Cod of clyi,l,Procedure S 1021 . 5835 y . ' Aso- t 60 7' 5835 STATE OF CAr.If't' IA � Cvll OF OVARGE ) o•: CITY OW DWINCTOW BRACE } 1. ALICIA X. WZI TWORTH, the duly elected, qualifies! City Clerk of the City of Huntington each, and ex-officid Clerk of the C'ty Council of said City, do hereby Certify that the whole number of sombatrs of the City Council cf the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affiraraiive vote of sore than a mrjcrity of all the members c' said City Council at a resul.a►r k0journ—ad vesting, thereof h-. id on the _7th day of March , 19 s,_88�, . by the following vote: AYES: CCnuIc f linen: Keliv, Green, Finlay,, ERskine, MsX ,�Winchell, Bannister w�.Yw+i�rrw H.w r .11wil.�J.Y.r �..s �� NOES** C ounc i lwren: None ASSENT- Couac i lmen: Notre + ll� , City Clark and ex-offidio Clerk of the City Council of the City , of NumbOgton Beach, California I 1 i:'A 444 fit`-•��it'k , .41, Y i. � j w 0 . y'1 nook r . f I i r ter rIt' y i�flvs.uber 7 , 1988 Mr . John Erskine , Mayor member#% of City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Hunti nSton Beach , CA 92648 ` i Dear Mayor Hrskine : On behalf of the Hunt.ingt2a Beach Chamber of Commerce 1 vould like to reconfirm our strong support for the parking structure which was approved by the FlaUning Coaaission on October 18 , 1988 . Parking remains one of the most aritioal aspects of rddevelopment . The current lack of parking facilities is one of the contributing factors is the downtown 's inability to be an soonomIcally viable area in our 0000usity . The proposed parking structure is an Integral part or the Lowntown Redeve- lopment area . Its placement Is wel* thought out and properly scarves the downtown area . This struature is vital to Posse I as well as other projects boaaase it provides the such needed parking reoilities which will allow Oount,owa redevelopment to prooedd as planned . fte deslgn► is attraotIve to will as ooapatibler with City design requirements , If the Covnaoll noels ' to aadifr the design in any wag , we understand there t Is a provision for the final playa to go before the Design Review Board for necessary changes . Thli project most rove foryard witbout delay * The Chamber of Commeros to in agreement with the Planning Commission ' s favorable decision and 00 nrge Cn14m0:11'D support an this v1ta2 pw03eot . 1 ,. dht 0041 +Cpeg , alti ggr�l,letrat 1W.a� CA 9 r� I , 5 . PERSONS AFFECTED Any person or organization who contract, with tine City or who , make arppl icat ion for �r•ry building permit , ,:.%,--1 rweight: permit , public street , public perk or public beach use , or any miscellaneous Use of City buildings or: other property or who provides any good or service whar.sover. e to the Cihy, is requited to comply with the requirements of this resolution . RESOLUTION tta . 4:337 and all other RESOLUTIONS in conflict herewith are hereby 'repealed . PASSED AND ADOAT)TED by the Ci Ly Counc;11 of the City of I� flunttngtori Beach at an ad Journed regular meeting thereof, held on � the 7th day March 1988 .__. 000 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk -� APPRO D AS TO CONTENT: APPROV 'D AS TO FORM:a,6.x �) 9 - - k-47-LIJ-4- ) - __ -.e K City Administrator Citv Attorney AEPROVED, INITIATING DEPARTMENT: ACTIN OF PUBLIC WORKS + - +jo w' r" . ! w�• EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO,_ 5 35-_� . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNT114GTO14 BEACH F,STABLISHING CONT14ACTORS AND PERMIT APPLICANTL INSURhNi:F AND INDEMNITY REQUTREMENT.S INUEMNTFICA TIONt-_DFF2NSE;, HOLD HARMLESS f CONTRACTOR heraby agrees to protect , defend , indemnify and hold and save li '. rml.ess CITY , its officers , and employees against; any and all liability , claim:; , judgments , costs and demands , however caused, including those r?sulti.ng from death or injury to CONTRACTOR ' S employees and damage to property , arising directly or i•ndi.rec:t_1y out or the ohlic;ations herein undertaken by CONTRACTORe or out of the operation: conducteO by CONTRACTOR, including those arising from the passive concurrent Negligence of CITY, but save and except those which arise out of the active• concurrent negligence, sole negligence, or the sole willful misconduct of CITY . CONTRkTOR will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense. Any costs of defense or attor.ney ' s fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obJ.xgation will be reimbursed to CITY by CONTRACTOR or may be awarded to CITY by a court of i;ompetent Jurisdiction as costs pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 5 1QIi . AM 71 1. �•, �.,' ;it ! 1 A: 1 , it Res. No. 5835 STATE OF CALI1►OMIA ) COLN" CW ORAWE ) s C17Y OF HURrINGTA-W D&ACH ) It ALICIA M. WENTWOUH, the duly elected , qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, attd ex-officio clerk of Lhe City Council of said City, do hereby cnrtify that the a hole number of m=Ws era of the City Co.u►ail of the City of Huntington beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more titan • majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular _2j�Uat!rnnd nee Ling thereof held on the „� •� day Of Mash 19 H8_, by the following vote: AYES'. Councilmen: Kaily, Green,finle+ , ERskine, Mgyn, Winchell , -Bannister ^ NOES: Councilmen: M I;lone ASSENT: Councilmen: None City Clerk and ex-•offi-io Clerk #; of the City Council of . the City of Huntington Beach, California yR4 5635 l �i f 1 Z A' Awl.')M►rrd 16 Nutall{h A11v*(1,5rT61r6 7f %U . ;;,,AUC „autt+t< bt• OOily+ of In* Sur»rlof Cnurf of Orange !.ountf, Cgl+lorhlaW 'aurnbet A-6214 C1#I&d 20 Soolorori&t 19i,1, and 'a %.26631, 06166 11 June, 1063 STATE OF CALIFORNIACi County of O:ange N,.i,.R ...•�. ,.o�., ....y lG•.W ,� "1 � I am a Gltf.ren of thel United Stags and a resfdanl of the CoL,rlty afore Saud. I lM Over the agrt Of elghtlmin 0 I yetPbrs, an1h not a party to or intertrsteJ 1n the entrtiod matter. I ae,-, a principal clerk of the Or,%nge V� I; Coast DAILY PILOT, with whtsh is combried the i NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the Cny of Costa Ma3a. ' County of Orange, State of Calitc mia, and *That a Vu lic Hearing Notice of ,... of which cop* attached hereto is tot true and complete copy, verso printed ar,d published in the Costa Mersa, N"Mon Beach. iluntinglon Basch, Fountain valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and La Junta Beach issues of said newspaper for Ci fi e ( 1 ) consecutive weeks to wit the isme(S) of October 28 198 8 I declare. under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on _..,..oc to bilir 26 � 198 at Cos Mesa, Calitorni Srpnature a PROOF OF PUDLICATION 1 µ Gs A,A , REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date ._.___2J2 +ember 7, 1988 S.sbmit ed tL: Honorable Mayor and City Council SobmllMd by; I'aul E. Cook , City Administ,ator��!� _ C • r r )' Community ri V ` Prespwretd by. Mike C. Ad3m.. , Acting Director,ractor, Camrr► :ni y e elt�pment 8ubim: APPEAL TO TOP, PLANOINC COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF EIMIRONMENTAIa IMPACT Ri8PORT NO. 8 3. 4/C0NDI Ar'ONAL. USE PERMIT NO. 8a-34/'COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-27/TENTATIVE PARC"RL MAP NO. 88•-385 Corsistot with Cound? Policy? N yes I ) flew Policy or Exception Stateamt of lasus, Recommendation, Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative Actions, Anschrrontu � Conditional Use Permit No . 88- 34 and Coastal Development permit No . 88-27 coastituto a request to construct an approximately 817 space, 5-level parking structui-a with 3-2 , 073 square feet of retail/office uses integrated within the structure . Tentative Parcel Map No, 88-385 is a request to consolidates all 28 lots within the subject: block into one parcel and to vacate. the !existing north/south alley. The Planning Commission, on October 18, 1988 , _E-.opted and certified Environmental Impact Report (Elk) No . 88-4 as adequate with Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approved Conditional Ilse Permit No . 68-34, Coastal Development Permit No . 88-27 and Tentative Parcel Map No . 88-389 with findings and conditions of approval. On October 25 , 1988, Councilwoman Finley appealed the Planning Co mission ' s decision based on her concern that the on-going evaluation of Downtown Historic Resources by Johnson--Heumann Research Associates is not yet compleete, and that the assessment of the projeect 's architectural compatibility with other downtown structures may not be sufficient . Q�t pl a ni8,g �CoisetiaA..RecgR .�L+�Q: The planning Commission, on October 18, 1988 , took the following actiona : ON NOTION BY 6XATZS AIND SECOND BY SILVA, THE >Pr.AmyrNa Comission 1U701 IlD AND CXRTIFIED AS ADEQUATE FIR NO, 88-4 BY ADOPTING PLANNING COW188109 ARSOLUTION NO. 1406 WITH STATENENT OF OVERRIDING CONS 100A` 101118, BY TFS FOLLOWING VOTE: AM; Blot*$$ Sipe, Higgins, Bourquignon ,t Orte goo Lesipsig, Livangood kl . d' A{lit+1 11mom r 1. .. Y 1 AN MOTION BY SLATES AND SECOND BY SI•LVA, THE PLANNING COM MISSICY APPROVED COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO . d6-27 WITH FINDINGS AND APFRCvFr CONDITIONAL US9 PHRMrT "O. 88-34 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AO. 88-385 WITH FINDIpds An CONDITIONS OF APPROVALo BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AXRS: Slates, Silva, Higg.ns, Bourbcignon NOES: Ortega, Leipzig, L.iveneiood A3$ZNT: Norte ABSTAIN t None The above-referenced 3tema are attached to this report : 1 . LetteK' of Appeal 2 . planning Commission Resolution No . 14U6 3 . Mitigation Neastires (Noted "Attachment A" ) 4 . Statement of Overriding Considerations (Noted "Attachment BR) S . Findings and Conditions of Approval for CDP 88--27, CUP 88-34 and TPH 88-385 Awl afica0=44t; on: Staff ie in concurrencc with the Planning Commission recommendation as outlined above , with the exception of Condition No. l . a . of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-34 . Staff would recommend that tuis condition be revised to read: l.a. "'Final elevations along 1Wn street shall be reviewed and apprived by the Design Reviews Hoard . For the purposes of this project:, the Design Review Hoard shall becomposed of Its regi'.lar membdis , plus representatives of the City Council, Manning Comi ssion, and Historic Resources Board. The final design shall incorporate into the facade architectural elements of the existing historic structures on the site . Applicant : City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency Appellant : Councilwoman Finley ,Location: Sounded by Main Street, Olive Avenue, Third Street, and walnut-, avenue The cowwrcfal portion of the proposed project includes 32,073 sgwsr: foot: of mixed retail, restaurant, and office uses set within t paWas structure, facing along fain Street, alive Avenue+ and gelmt hvenue» ehe Zro ject is in accordance with the intent of they w dun Specific Plan . Dtetrict 30 which is the commercial core eggs of the ibwnt:own, 804 An lntesdo to be maintained as a PO4WOW62 orIOUtOd street . The esisting uses on the sits �',�, �`.�'`"• ,r.�';,; � ���� ."�"' �lid i�d 7 ,s ` ,0 w.� include comercial and office uses a�ong Mail Street with some residential uni.tr above, parking areas and reeui.denueeu along Third! Street , and temporary the tam quarters of the Surf Museum on walnut X 9 Avenue . Many of they existing atructures are not sexsmicall, safe . All structures are proposed to be demti 1 i.s he:d to accommodate the now structurd . The proposed retail su'.tes will front M4in Street , Walnut Avenue, Arid Olives Avenue, opening unto pedestrian arl;ades and pONlic plazas . Restaurant and office eases are proposed on the second floor Zront:ing Main Street . The commercial. portion: :if the buildi ~g will be integrated into the parking structure so that the buildin appears as a unified whole . The parking structuxe portion of the building will consist of 5 levels , including one subteerranosn and one roof top level . The maximum height will be 37 feet (approximately equal to 3 stories) ) with architectural feea..ur.e s projecting u to 47 feet . Approximately p � 9 p Pp y 817 parking spaces wi.Ll be provided, 181 of which are required for the commercial portion of this project, and 553 of which aie required for the approved entertainment center located at Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway (Pier Colony) . Thus , approximately 83 spe ces will be so,railab'a within the, structure sort other uses in the Downtawet area . The total ne,ember of available spaces may be adjusted slightly to 311ow for the placement of ticket booths with adequate stacking area for two vehicles . The layout of the parking structure complies with the City' s recently adopted standiirdst (Section 9605 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code) , including .8 . 5 'x184 parking stalls and 26 ' 60 Friedley aisieways . No compaot stalls will be permitted . Vehicular access is taken from waln,it Avenue and Oliver Avenue. Environmental nocesesing In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Environmental Impact Report No . 88-4 was prepared to analyze the potential impacts of the proposed commercial-parking structure . The requisite procedure that was followed is outlined beelow• August 2, 1.988 St3f f conducted are initial study and determined that an EIR would be nacessary for the project . August 3 , 1988 A Notice of Preparation was filed with the State Cleesringhousee to notify public of intcnt to prepare an EIR. September 15, 1968 Notice of Completion filed with Statue Clneeringhousee, draft SIR available for public review and comment for thirty days . (Covent period : 9/15/88-10/16/88) October 18, 1988 Public hearing before Planning Commission to certify Environmental impact Report No. 88--4 WA - 11/7/88 (1S48d) �,s y t ' ^ i 1.� NO R� Comm its and vespunses regarding nEIR 88-4 were distributed to S Planning Commission members prier to the public hearing and are { included as an appendix in the Final EXA, Xnvi%Oar)%nta1 JM_ ! .t Ra1 t Ift - .88-4 tnviroweental Impact Report No . 88-4 was prepared by Sanchez Talarico Associates, Inc. , to analyze the potential impact of thq proposed commercial building and pi.,rking structure . Since the City Council will now be the Final decision maker on the projer,t., the docun%)nt !trued be adopted and certified by the City Council prior to final action on Conditional Use Permit No . 88-14 , Coastal Development Permit No . 88-•27, or Tentative Parcel. Map No . 88-385 . The environmental. impact report discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of land use, aesthetics $ light and glare, noise, air quality, historical resources, earth resources, housing and transportation and circulation. The lirect, indirect and cumulative { impactor of the proposal are addressee , as are the impacts of p-1 -iject alternatives . Through the uses of appropriate mitigation measuros ;dentified in the FIAt, the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be reduced to a level of insignificance. There are however. , some adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that cannot be completely eliminated ":hrough Mitigation measures . 'These impacts include potential short-term land use impacts related to architectural incompatibi 2ity, impacts from now light sources associated ,fith the project, and impacts on the recorded history of, Huntington Beach, the proposed Mr.in Street Historic District, and on-site historic resources . Each of these effects can be lessened by mitigation measures suggested ir, the environmental impact report, and staff recommends these be incorporated into the project . Notwithstanding the adoption and implementation of the recommended mitigation areasures , approval of the ;project requires that a statmaent of overriding considerations be adopted by the City Council, finding that the economic and social benefits of the Vtopased project outweigh its potontially adverse impacts . prior to cartifioation and adoption of the EIR by resolution, the City Council may ascend the document . It should be noted, however# that rem vel. of any of the recormnded mitigation measures that would alter the conclusions of the ZIR would require recirculation of the document. The following discussion addresses Councilwoman Finley' s appeal . JgkprJ&A4I Zannox MI 'The City has identified a potential Downtown Historic District , whit; includes the 300 block of Main Street, the 200 and 300 blocks of Fifth Street, and buildings can the north side of Olive Avenue hobftea Third erA Fifth Streets. The proposed distract includes approximately 22 pre-1940 buildings that reflect the early small A 11/7/Sg —4,- (154") L����d.Yr�i�Y.iLlYitluSL'.1Y,a•rY4�+ •h:+,.a_btl',',r.:.i;vah.,.0.,u. ,... . ,":.. _ ..— ____— _— -- _ ' , x I� 4.�.i w sli4f dty Of a0~v"060h WIN at caw Cky e4rk Ir.0. � i64 f� �; :;� `Occu ant MOVE(), t,EFC NC 6R17ER y "ttluntington 220 lbird Street INSUFFICIryNT01 Beach, CA( 92648 ATTEMf�EnL, UNKNOWN SUCH NUMBER c; HUINTllllU"TO►l r1Cli, CA I IR1049 ' CLASS M . . .. ji {fslsrrsfrlrllrrsisrl�rslirsr{Ii ... 'Ow of Ha oifim of for city Oft _ F Occupant �4 221 119eln Stre Huntington 13 a 9 26 4� ach C Jq _� r / . N v/ 1 FIRST CLASS MAIL ! Ilrlrsrrt�lrifrr�lrr�lr►ir�rrlll C.�1 Metfea aty m llrnreiw�rn%mob OWM of ft ift Mik :!bin n, 1 0 , occupant (0'"1 r 1 217 Main Street r HunthygtOn ct►, CA 9264b [l U N ; i i t*'.A ; , ( A -AC LEE T ASS MA �-w anew • brr.1 Iy M.•�M ' om"of IN MY cwM b" Its "rMrtinom ion. CA saw 7 1Yr� 124 Third ;4treet ov � Flunttr,gtun Here CA 82898 . . W%GTON 1�1111��(S BJvl ��' 1 t' 1 r FIRST CLASS M I r . .r 4-c N ; �� Oeeupolnt •► _, 115 Vjird ,. .reef ��` `�r Huntington Beach, e �i48 r.-- , _ FIRST CLASS MA1 11�Lw. III lift 1111111 kill 11l11I1I L1�1 Meti�a Chy of MrwltirVM$414101 QHirr of dw City Chrrk 1iWMOM sue► �- Upant Walnui • 92648 . 4UU6 ., • ttngton Bm , CA 82648 HUNTINGTON B CA Vct eel K M,- OT CLAS AL � s �111�of tt� . . • _ . „ ,, �. ���' '� ,� ' . •. 'bird Street ntington Peach, CA 92648 P26 /M . 1 � � I� 1!'.•1 �1 FIRST CLASS MAIL I 111111111 All 11��1��1,I�„�Illi���l�l���ll��i f --Uiol Notice city en Maoaw4o" raalr ofaft of va efty W J P. 0.ftx IN 04, �Occupant 122 lbird Street2b48 • 41Ub Huntington Elflach A 92648 TI�IGT N NCH,CA eci FIRST • 11�1����1�1�11���1��11��I����lil ,�,_,�„ L i NOW P. 0. rc 140CA am . r��•\ � - ; .. r,, ',�;� -Occupant v ' 210 Third Street Huntington 0eaeh, A 92648 :92648. 4QQ -014 1 cl r � rwvv T CAA", MAL 1' I r4 + Y ayw �r r✓I .,aw• Co"*f C ,� .. N. N bw IW i1111RM11�lpCA �' ' :' _ 1�r :1 � q r; 7 y '•� � • � �,�� 221 Third Stmet 1 :Nuntington Beach, t;,O.A QS1648 .,.�., 0 FIRST CLASS MAIL City Of Hurd Hunt l ° o „cu�ent IS Third Street Huntington Beach/A9 4$ � tI• •f�'ti1,�1� FIRST CLASS M IL ' �I{IItI1II�IIIiiI�I11IIliill�ll� �,�„�,,.. � i M stf�� j O of�sollk 11.Ck &W N liw�tl�, +n MAMA, CA `f 303A main street 1` Huntington D"cho A 92648 e �%F M , T CLASS MAIL �.10 • soft + , 1 i .,� +wa �•�z1'ate*` 1 . r Y . A' '•,'111'',��,� �SI•i. ! �1,,� Occupant ''k��� 23A !Wain Street r ' '" �► ntington Beech, C/92648 CLASS MAIL ' (III„11�111��111�111'It��lllif� YWY11 Y.1 I■ YI•i •1 .w_4'+_�ri�..�__ _—��.... ..nw L id NRItke �� ef r9 oi"of do ►i P. ilmmik ion book CA 0 VIC' occupent main Street .r- a w ti fiuntingtc.•n BE-aeh, C, FRST CLASS MAILlea �11�I�II11�111�,;!�;1�1111��) Vm OCCUpknt �, , •. � ' 206 Mein Stint ` Huntingtan Beach, A 92648 W ST CLASS MAIL �1•� r; w,' 11�'11�1111'�� �•,' 111 1 1 i ' znrx,,.,. 7 r t v••S ` Via, .•.�' 16#*64 tow 44 MW!`WqW+ i OTIS Merle E. Cade iv1. . Avon s�y0�a Midw, City, A 92655 Al J � Ao" NC �•$ /a FIRO T CLASS MAIL 6"81 MVT1GM . tile►Of 19%Ant1**um 6wh t fte of tho +pity :Ilona h 4 untir*m Bench, CA 02M ,ferry Wijl;rjms 7V72 ,,9ea91en Drive 11untingtt)n 13eac,�, C!'� y�648 � I.l:1.1.. ;1:. ,,;;',',`i(1:'�if.'�:r°�:�:!. I'�':�'II:J �!•.I:r. CLASSFIRST MAID C'I(Illi::l'tiC1.1 Bl: "( (..'�"1 � s_t.r,>., LM•f Nfjtl** C� STAMP COLLECTIV, QW at low oil" �f P.M.,; r 1S A HOBBY t .t of do r Its .,. •- iF tmr 1�.q. 1� 1i� �". �� �''a� Nov � �Q�1. A � k`7 rF1�S�1 Sti4t DevOtQPment WAVE" ' • Suite 200 �a o • '' TWO Coc 4 pacate P:aaa Newport Beach, CA 0266f, 4 FPST CLAS MAI RETURN 'rt:) ;iElVl?I h NO FURWARDIN" URDER ON FILE L*WLE TO FORWARD 1 , r'�I .. 1Ylyyyt � �, • tOM GOvOlOPSIOnt of Huntington peach, 10 of which are contributing Os sigAificant to the District . Nine more of these buildings are Votantial contributors to the tistrict if existing reWd*lx are reversed, state criteria requires 65% of the District buildings (retain !historic Character . Theme area eleven historic buildings on the subject site that have been ranked by the 1966 City of ftat'ingtoa beach Historic Resources Survey Report , and which are 91611Y aasaribed in ZIR 88-4 . The City has recently comfiissionea a consultant, Johnson-Heumann Research Associates to evaluate the downtown hi.e*ori.c resources by trenslatini� the rankings of the 1986 Oistoric 7telsourc+an Survey into National Register categories. The stuff is presently on-going. dtaff feels that the outcome of the Johnson-He+umann study will not serve to change the conclusions of Draft EIR 88--4 , suggest alternativon that were not dii.scussed, or provide mitigation measures that were not conxiderrd . The DEIR, on page 71, clearly states, "Thar proposed project will have a signlfic:ent effect on the recorded history of the City of : antingt:on Beach, the City proposed Main Street Historic District , and an-s-ite historic resources . " The Draft SIR identifies thk.t- the project will have gig if i Alit eqUaidAble imoacta on tl.e history of Huntington Beach, on the proposed National Register of Historic ?daces District, and on -site resources . The DBIR also indicates that the project will have unavoidable adverse cumulative impacts on the recorded history of the City of Huntington Beach, the: City proposed Main Street Histoxfc District, and historic resources within the community generally, The Johnson Heumann study currently in picugress will not alter these i conclusions . ArcultUtuxal compaLibility Another concern associated with the project is the potential incompatibility of the pro)ect ' s mediter.rranean-style architecture with the adjacent styles on the Rehabilitation Block (200 block, west side of fain) and the proposed Heritage Sqt.,.are block (300 block, east side nf, Main) . Hot4ever, the City proposeb to include in the ar4bi UCtutrarl style of they project a number of elements and feature* associated with the architectural style of the surrounding area and existinq bui�ldinca on the project site. Thus the compatibility of both asides of Mein Street will be facilitated. Staff is recomaending that Condition of Approval No. Ia. of Cauditional Use Permit No. 88-34 be revised to read: *I . a . Final *lerrations 8101A9 Mire Street t;.%L l l be :tevieLwed and approved by the Assign Review Board, For the purposes -,f th,s project. they DRB shall be composed of its regular members, plus .:epreaentativen of thR City COnnci.l, planning Comminnione and Historic Resources rt f2ard. The final design shall into rk)arate into the facades architectural eloftats, of the existing historical structures on the site. * A table describing the azititing historical structures is attached to ,:his repo r t WA -- 11/7/80 ,.g.. (18460) •ayfY I J •ry, • IN.; n 1. 1 I•�1 1 1 ` spy 7 9t ebm1d also be noted that the proposed project will inearp*rate ,` 8 "tagronaen elownts, and be architecturally compatible with ;1; tol8ted proleets in the Downtown area that comply with the !downtown ftal,p ftidolines, including Villas del Mar, Town Square, Main-Pilar Mee I and II, North of the Pl ar parking structure, and Pierside 1 . village. �fr The proposed yroject it covered by Draft Environmental Impact Report No. 88 -4 . Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 88-34, CoABtai Development Permit No. 88-17 or Tentattva Parcel Map No . the City Council must adopt and caktify as adequate rtR 88-4 s by adopting a Revolution with statement of overriding �`1 ool8st *s:itions . Environmental issues are further discussed in the 11RALYdIS motion of this report, above. not applicable . %- The City Council may continue Envirommntal Impact Deport No . 8a-4, Conditioner Use Permit No . 88•-34 , Coaatai oeveiopment Permit Flo . 88-27 and Tentative PaL'C01 Map NO. 88µ385 in order to consider additionel conditicna . i 1 . Letter of Appeal 2 . Planning ComminsiYon Resolut4 on 140f 3 . Nitigatiou measures (Doted littachment A) 4 . Stater,-•nt of Overriding Considerations (Noted Attachment a) 5 . Findings R Conditions of Approval for CLIP 85--34 , CT)P a8-27 , TYX 6 . Table of Existing Historic Buildings 7 . Planning Camr,ission Staff Report Dated October 18, 1988 g. draft City Council Resolution Adopting EIR 80-4 9. Counts and Responses - SIR 88-4 a y Pq! " liil s Lp t p� 'AI 1 A l 11/'7/88 -6- (1546d) i •4 ilyr ;rR�IX CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r Ufa CITY . •� • ''' ', COUNCIL COMMUNICATION * � • v .. -b lr C1ty Council F a Ruth Finley r Cewde Drx4viay, City Clark Cou,cilwoman .; . OU&MOT DATEAPP L 0:r �PLMNINO Cl��(ON�J October 25, 1988 AC'!ON ON 9IR . CUP 88-34, COP W270 TPU 8S x reqmW, a ti hartr4g before the City Courrcil of the above applications. I , ft ' Cammimiatr`t certii'ition of EIR 8&-4 and the related a�y e l is for the tallawft reamm. 1. The Plannft Commission's decision to certify EIR 9" is premature. On Jww 27, 1988, the City Ox=il commissioned a consultant, .Johnson Heumaxm R,esawch Assoistes, to evaluate the downtown historic resources by galath* the rankirW of the 1986 Historic Resources Survey into National 1 rRegbw Categories. The stt* is presently ors-going and the results will be ; aveftWe vary shortly. 3. The assessment of the architectural compatibility of the proicti~t with other sawtures in the dowatown area may not be suff6ctent. X IJi n Alp —a X. y,SeIF cti 47 rK„ .r •„yr•'t''•'.;' ' ^,� kV Y 1 �y l ry, Jam•.,. ';. r,, ,.:., . rtii' r'Q,,• . i X280LtTr I dS NO. 1406 A oun �S p 1YSQ I SId or ' CIZ7[ or MMIUMN SUCHo ChLIFORNIA t ADOPTING ZNVIROMM" ZMACT UPORT SQ. 08--4 FOR THE PARXING STRUCTURE AND C CIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED ROUTHF.AUT OF MAIN S?itEST, 200 BLOCK WHXR A6, Xnvironmental Impact Report No . 88-4 and related, entitlements have been prepared; and Th e City of Huntington Beach was the lead agency in the preparation of the Environmeental Impact Report ; and All permons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly giver, have been heard by the planning Commission either through written notice or during a public hearing on October 18 , 1988 , and such responnes and comments as were madam were duly nited and responded to. VOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Conunission of the City of Huntington Beach as Follows : SECTION 1 . The Planning Con.-unission does hereby find that Environmental Impact Report No . 88-4 has been completed in compliance with the Californian Environmental Quality Act and all State and local guidelines therefore. SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission has considered all significant effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report No . 88-4 , together with existing and proposed measures to mitigate such significant effects (see Attachment A) . SECTION 3 . The Planning Commission further finds that through the implementation of the aforementioned mitigation measures, the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated aiith the proposed project can be eliminated or reduced to a level of Insignificene"O SECTION 4. The planning Commission finds that the benefits accruing to tao City, botb economically and socially, by virtue of Ming the DowntmM Apecific Plan, override the unmitigatable 0 its dotalled in Environmental Impact Report No. 88-4 and the Ott-aaW statemnt of overriding considerations (see Attachment S) , lbo Pisnniha COMISsion of the City of Huntington Beach does �'- j 846pt jisd certify as adequate Savironmental Impact iteport No. + .r . ' ` • r ' F f Mom t r iF' DRAFT W=X0X S. fte Planning DiTeCtor is hereby authorised and 13roadd to filer with the. Office of the County Clark a notloi of rpswanlubtlas for Environikatal Impact Report No . 88-4, an required W SWt1on 21132 of the California Bnvironm ntal Ouality Act A, PA8590 AND AbOPTLFD by the Planning Comniaeion of the City of r NRptitt ton Roach, on the 18th . day of October, 1988, by the foalow ag roll call vote: Ash: •. s: MINT.* Mike Adama , director, Planning Cowission Chairman Cormunity Development I I i L r r , . d C NPS �J • Y, I YY �� � MITIGATION HZ"URR$ nvixomwNTAL rmpAcT !lhPORT NO. 8 8-e 1. fxtog to the approval of the site plan for the project, all roofing materials shall be ch4r4cteristic of maditerranean o tchitecture. Flat roofs shall be avoided . Walley shall be integrated with the overall building design . Solid concrete block walls, grape stake, or chain Unk fencing shall not be pereitted. 2 . The City shall implement consistency of similar lighting standards along both sides of Main Street . 1 . A sign and landscape plan shall be submitted 'Co the City Planning Department prior to approval of the site plan. The lo+Cstion and type of all signs shall be in conformance with the standards listed on page ?3 of the Downtown Design Guidelines . All landscaping materials shall also be consistent with the guidelinas . 4 . Prior to the approval of the site plan, the parking structure design shall meet all criteria standards as listed in the Local Coastal Program Article 5605 . 1 . 34 The City shall encourac n and/or sponsor a planned sign progran: on both sides of Main Street , This program shall include possible sign amortixation, City funded removal of existing i t; signs * and City funded purchase and mounting of now signs. This program shall be implemented as part of the rehabilitation proj*ct proposed for the pest-side of Main Street . �I S« The City shall ipplement consistency of similar hardscape and X on both elde■ of rain Street. � fty *bell Implownt the rehabilitation project (200 clock 1* ittreet) which Includes second story bui ldinj elamnts and 'Jqk4wW of colors, entryways, and windows along both sides ,.� • � ,� •�," Street . *oil* and engineering report shall bo Froper d by a qualified soils engineo r based on a detailed plan of tW Vftjeoto All reeos ndations of this report shall b3 is corpersted into the pro f oct. to A re"944 me Meftno shall be arranged to discuss the itAltens of the soils investiget.14a 604 protect Ow��tS prior to starting radio work on the site. 3; 01 eerie of all Coneecaid partl es shall be pres*nt [��[1T..SI�.. C�L.�: -Y'�_ ,i Zz1 ''KL'.lr, �.,H'-\. .. ._.•'� . tli..lir• .�• __ 5 i;!n( N. °i•` - --- — _ _ ' .. * Pam• jo r8c Y l! He SCA41of and foundation plans, when available and prior to 4190tpw8i, shall be transmitted to a `qualified soils engineer 96t towlem for compli4nco with their reconmndations . 11� A1114WNW11tione debris # vegetation, utility lines, atc . , shall be Teimved and disposed of otfatte prior to commencement of arsca�vati.+an. 12. The oxposed boti:om shall be observed by the soil engineer and any loosa/soft areas shall be properly compacted to at least 90 ' percent of the maximum density attainable by ASTM Test Method yroceur• D1857-76 . A report from the soil engineer confirming the adequacy of the excavation bottom shall be submitted upon Coupletion of the work . 13 . A shallow sprepd ,footing foundation sh311 be constructed far the structure tsaumf-ig the lower level �o be 10 feet below existing ground surface and bottoms of tootings at least 4 feet below the lower level (f. loor) . 14 . Malls shall be backfilled with select sand having a sand equivalent of at leash 30 within one foot of the ,face of wall from the too tt. one foot below the top . 15 . 'walls shall be provided with subdrainage consisting of 4-inch-diameter, perforated PVC., pipe ( installed with perforations down) , sui rounded by .at least 1 cubic foot. per foot of 3/8--inch to 3/4-inch gravel that is wrapped with Supac SNP Filter Fabric or approved equal o and laid at a slope of 1 percent . 16 . The subdrain shall be connected to an appropriate storm drain or sump pump. 17. Footing excavations shall be observed by a staff member from a qualified soils engineer . Any excavation which exposer unsuitable bearing soil shall be deepened as recomnended by the soil engineer , 18. A vapor barrier consisting of id--mil Visqueen covered with ebo at '6ne inch of "clean" sand shall be provided below only lowest floor slabs, 19 . Slab reinforcement shall consist o" No . 3 'jars at 18 inches on a tear each Bray. lteinforciang bars shall be placed on concrete *dhaaits'O to ineure that they are pro;�erly centered in the slab. 20. ZOW-SUVO Conerete shall be specified for slab-on-grade St>ruation to minimize cracking . d Y r l a ri iStims gill Materials &ad dilsturbsd, loose soils shall be removed and rop,&acM vith component material as requiteed by ` qualified soils anginwa. Site preeparationp excavation4 and bp$ . iverk compaction operations shall be performed under the observation and testing of a soils engineer. Certification of *uch reports, shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to i issuance of a certificate to operate . 22 , it shall be the responsibility of the owner and/or contractor tax bring to the attention of a certified soils engineer any unusual Conditions which may be encountered in the courae of E project development and to request appropriates guidance before proceeding with the affected work, and to ensure that the seecoraeotrndat-tons of the soil report and any supplemental report(s) area implemented . 23 . The applicant shall incorporate recommendations provided by the 4 Foundation Soils Investigation into project design, plans and specifications . 24 . The project shall implement mitigation measures included in Downtown Specifics Plan SIR 82-2 . 25 . All structures shall be designed in accordance with the seismic design provi,aicsas of the Uniform risilding Cedes to promote safety in the event of an earthguake. 26. Prior to the issuance of grading permitso the applicant shall provide documentation of existing structural conditions in t& vicinity of the proposed project and the estimated extent and impact of subsidence on surrounding structures and anther improvements, to the satisfaction of the Building Divi$= on of the Community Development aepurtment of the City of tiunti.ngton Beach. 27 . Should groundwater be found during excavation, deweateering of the project site shall be required . The applicant shall monftcr the extent of subsidence and its associated impacts through placement of appropriate testing devices under the supervision and surveillance-of to qualifid soils engineer. The City shall be ks t informed regarding any structural impacts on adjacent propert as and other Improvements , and if feasible and necessaty. ro:;_.4truction, process will be modified to eliminate such impacts . son i 28. fte applicant shall motet with residential and business terents to explain conversion process and relocation assistance. 29 , The applicant shall assist in the relocation of porsons afiectead by this rere svelopment project . VAO i.f r 80. 11M oppliceet shall provide a relocation coordinator who will �t+o�►id+� oaera1 rrlo+ atior, assistance t all tonant* . J�i►ailabilitx of such a relocation assistant shall be to the approval of the City Council and shall be incorporated into the Rdloestion Assistance program required by Article 927 of the municipal Cads. 31 . The applicant shall assist displaces in obtaining replacement r housing by providing current and continuing information on the availability and prices of houiaa for sale and rental units that are comparable, decent, safe and sanit-ary . 32 . Residential replacement dwellings shall be in equal or better neighborhoods at rents or prices within they financial, mean, of the Individuals and familieu displaced, and reasonably accetasible to their places of employment . 33 . Before any displacement occurs, comparable: replacement dwellings shall be offered to displaces that are !'air housing open to all persons r.egardinC of race , color , religion, sex, or national origin and consistent with requirements of Title V111 of the Civil Rights Act of 1963. 34 . The applicant shall supply to displaces information concerning f'aderal and state assisted housing programs and any other known seervican being offered by. public and private agencies in the area . 33 . The applicant shall monitor, on a continuing basis, the needs of all disp" iced persons in order to minimize hardship to such persons. 36 . The applicant shall provide residential compensation in accordance with State Guidelines (California gelocation Assistance and Feral Property, Acquisition - Calikorria � Acmfnintrativo Code Title 35, Chapter 6) which compensates for: i a. The coot of the physical move. b. The Mental differance (up to $4 , 000) between the current rent or 35 percent of the grok:s monthly income (whlcheaver i In less) * c. The first and last months rent will be advanced against payment. 4. The rental difference in excess of 3,1 ,000 will be evsaenssted in hardship casoa or as a last resort . 37* Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for the proposed irrtail/officer spaces, an affordable housing agreement plan to provide affordable housing within 3 miles of thr Coastal Zone fot the replacement of the 34 eesinting units displaced as a result of this proJoct shall be submitted for review and approval by' the Comr Unity Dovreelopment Department . i ,1 s we n , r. 00 61014048t. shall assist nonresidential displacements by "ilable information on comparable properties for lease or putebese. $9, TM applicant iha],l provide relocation assistance to all displaced businesses in accordance with the State Guidelines of Title 23, Chapter 6 . This assistance Mi 11 include information on the availability of other suitable sires , as well as fayments to cover moving expenses and/or the loss income nc luel ing The cost of the physical move. !b. The cost of' anything rendered uxelesa as a consequence of th move ( i .e . business cardx, etc . ) c. The cost of physical improvemFints . i 40 . Comprehensive documentation of the � rp eyt site, as it p currently ezists, shall be prepared prior to the issuance of any building, grading and/or demolition permits . The documentation shall be in aicc wrdance with standards established by the Historical American Buildings Survey/Historical America►u Engineering Records (NABS/HAER) . The report stall be archi.ially maintained with provisions for public access . 41. . Prior to the approval or issuance of any demolition, gra,11ing, and/or builuing permitm , all Facets of the project: shall be reviewed by the Planning Director for compliance with Historical Resources mitigation measures Nos . 40-42 . 42 . An adequate monitoring and/or bonding programs shall be established to ensure that demolition and construction vibration impacts do not adversely affect offsite structures . Tt0i 43 # grief to the issuance of a permit for the project, it shall !A redesigmA to provide a system to insure a driver it not allow to enter a circuit (upward or downward) if no parking spaces are available. 44 , p;ior to the issuance of a permit for the project, it shall be COA68 9 to prohibit left-turns into the structure from 011ve AV, s r prohibit left turns out of the structure from Walnut l�ventse i { H'f^•,pw*'.rA' AM 1 1,y, .Iyr. r rojoat *M11 be redesigmed to provide gelo:ation of ticket U80 t4r ' i At to provide stacking for at 10"t two scorn 64 structures. dd. Vwigr to that issuance of a permit for the project , It shall be f reU"Big"Od to provide two daft lanes on Olive Avenge . 47 prior to the occupancy of the project, the STOP sighs on Olive Averneue! at Third Street and at Second Street shall be removed . 44. Prior to the occupancy of the project, a right turn larva► for westbound plivo Street traffic shall be added . 49 . Prior to the occupancy of the prof en.t, they intersections of Orange Avenue and Main Street and Orange Avenue and Lake Street shall be analysed for traffic signal warrants . If warrants are met, the signs shall b© installed. w, AIR_ ,r3TY 50 . Water shall be applied to the site twice daily in comp' iance with SCAQW Rule 443 (rugit:ive Dust: Emissions) to mitig4te the impact of constrruct:ion-deneeriuted dust particulates . 51 . The applicant shall comply with all rules and regulations of the SCAM. 52 . Kajor grading shall occur when soil moisturo in high . i 53 . Adequate dust: suppressants shall be used. $4 . A Transportation System Mansgement (TSM) Arlan shall be initiated and shall include the following components: i a . Shall provide bus services to regf-onal activity centers stithin the County for ":atel visitors . b. 1►acilita'te pedestrian accoss to Mach amenities, via at--grade crosetralks and a levated crossings . C. promote emplo rlse use of public transportation. PCOV140 We shelters, benches, and bus pockets near the �'� proposed pr'e�i ect. Sb, r project &wign shall comply with standards not forth in T010 24 to rdbiai zer total consumption of eneirrgl►, t di. fte p90309 ^tructure shall bo designed and econst.ucted in 000ordae *e,tb the Uniform building Celle Ventilation Standards to roducs vehicle emissions levels within the faeilify. . 1 .In1YW A'01"y 1 0"4 i, .�. •Y $?. Canstruetion sctark shell be conducted only b+atoeaen the hours of I s 00 AN tea S=SO PK, Houday through daturdaT as ma►rsdated by than ftty'& Noise Ordinance . No construction shall be alliwead on Sundays at rederel holidays $I@ A, tnxtusred perking surface, such as asphalt or textured r' concrete* shall be used in the parking structure to redga6 tire $9. s$pn of the parking structure 0311 incorporate one of the tallouLng noise attenuation options : so Encloca the parking structur,4 ' s sidevall parallel to the residential area. b. Allow openings in the structure' s xidewallA and plane a masonry wall on the i,ip level of the st ructuero parallel to the residential at rea w c. Or other sound attenuating do�ign features to the approval of the planning L)irectcr . 60 . Maintain a 130 foot separation between the zesideant`:Lal and parking structure uses or other esaund attenuating deaign feature to the approval of the Pl.a:aning Director , 61. in compliance with Title 25 , Chapter 1, Sub.-Chapter 1 , Arti :ie 4 , the applicant shall $ubmit an acoustical analysis of the proposed development , prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering . Upon completion of the subject structure, field teats shall be roguire d under the provisions of Title 25 . 620 JA21 roaftyp mounted lights shall be located and shteelded so matt all light is eontarinad within the boundaries of the projeeat and no light spillage r)cc irs to adjacent propart ieu. ,.. „ $3 . ALlL interior lights shell be nigh intanaity discharge (storm + la ) witb no light spillage to adjacent properties. So r. W.-ro ieent tube .,i*tu>res shall be allowed . ;: . Ad tiobt and glare from automobiles operating within the parking 4� tvtlee *MIX be screened with solid, opaque mail tnateeart3ts 1 0WIStaining all 1�,eAtll4tion requireeeaonts of A,% vnitacaa Rimi fie. Sg. Srioat to the issuance *2 Building permits approVaei , a detailed lighting plan w1hell bo apprive d by the Department of Comwaity pe'1relowent. The plan shall be consistent with the Downtown ai Wag place and lighting standards isr the Downtown Deeign Ort�e'le�linee. 141 Y s1 ,L�o eLL Yq • �•0 i •5 . dMO WACT log cool, go* I" or on CMUN NAWINOWN final savironmental Impact Deport 88-4 for the proposed tacking structure and ccttawrrcial building identifier certain eriavot able adverse significant environmental effects. CE' QuWelinos Section 15093 requires the decision-maker (Planning Ceewdssi,on) to balance the benefits of a proposed project against Its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether the ,} project should be approved. If the decision-makes (Planning Comission) concludes that the benefits of the project outweigh the unrevoidabl* adverse environmental effects, the effects may be considered acceptable. r' • More, the City of Huntington Best.,,* dots find that the benefits thin to they Cityand its reesidents from the project outweigh the � j g significant adverse environmental effects which remain after the pro ject ,s mitigation treasures are implemented. primary among such considerations are the elimination of blighted conditions esist:ing in the Kain-Vier Redevelopment Project Area, development of needed parking facilities in the Downtown area, elimination of seismic! deficiencies, and the pro jeect e s furtherance of the Downtown Specific plan and Local Coastal Plans objectives for increasing access to coastal and ocean amnities . Another important consideration to the significant amount of revenue which will result to the City and thee Redevelopment Agency from the project , which revenues can be ua'eed to i rave service levels, construct capital facilities, provide a i,tionsl affordable houniugp and' for other important public purposes. The final. EIR identifies three separate unavoidable adverse � environmental impacts (seen Section 6 .3--Unavoidable Significant Advorsee =f f eats) . These are: 1. Short-term architectural/design incompatibility of the project with older structures in the Immediate vicinity* 2. Increased light from now sources associated with the project . a. Project-specific and cumulative impacts on the recorded hi6tear7 of the City of Huntington Beach, the City proposed stain Street Historic District, and on-site historic buildings, as a resul . of demolition of existing structures on the block. Rach of these effects is lessened by the mitigation measures suggested in the aIR, which measures will be required and Incorporated Into the project . The reasons the City has determined that the remaining effects of each impact are °acceptable" , given offsetting projuct 'o*nefits are discussed below. j !tiro, 4141 yrt Sv ,, r ' ,• � , o i. ' 1%r� ' �( r. .: �, ,_.x„Il�i"'� Y;'.'�: •i„7`' l.. i d � , ,.rr i '(.4 �, ,rFl. , n . ,; � 7 e .; N, 44 At tv magal ;+ bttog a abiiectscal style on the subject site is similar to 4 :,. SO fig" west of Kai,$ attoot (bghabLIttation Stock) - soa bloc it on the *gat side 09 Mein street (proposed y iggafqp flock) . the style reflects the typical building � . ► tbb eat r 1Soo' r. The proposed project s of Ccntesrpora,ry ' • tgi seen design, in conformance with the Downtown Design � �ulaeliaes . • s ..Qity ,dooe, h wever, intend to change the predominant argMtodtursl ptyle of the Rehabilitation block and Heritage Square black by Incorporating second story design elements and roofing and extev4or „ wetgsiel, similar to the proposed projeect, thereby schiiiing long tore compatibility. Mitigation measures have been laclvdoO to assure that such changes are implermernted# and to assure that +Sgbeistent lighting standards, signs, landscaping and hardsco ping ago utilised on both sides of Main Street. in addition to .tbo fer"sing conSiderationr, the proposed project ai.li be j architecturally compatible with related projects in tho Downtown area thtt also , comply with the Downtown design duidelinee, including viilas del WAr, Toren Square, Main--pier phoso I and Ii , north of the pior panting structure, and pieraido Village * � A is go *Iteroative identified in the SIR which Mould preserve the At arehitocture along stain street would reduce short-term i +llatro but in order tc achiever the intent of the Downtown Si c . plan O May require Elie taking of Third Street. This would conflict with the circulation of the adjacent Main-Pier Phase I develop ont, and would not be envirotmentally superior overall. Cowrtgr�►Oling any short-term incompatibility that remains after mitigated» are Me following benefits flowing to the City. The proj*ct previdox needed parking for the adjacent Main-Pivc Phase I d:ev 1 t, as well as for other users of downtown services. The pt , ''frill Imple"nt the Downtown Specific Plan and Local Coastal 14^ ,;br9VA4 ,ng pedestrian orient activities along Main Street, , i�rhaalsrg Vat ing and theveby public acevss to coastal amenities , 4*4 rSploaing sees rivolly deficient buildings with new builiAngs . 2. SOANOLIPaht _Juiecia. The project will incrosso the amount of light generated on this site relative to that .which currently "Lots. now light souccom are primarily associated with the parking area and automibf lees, which will be visible, from adjacent areas sod Contribute to general night sky illumination. Such lighting will be visible duce to the rerlatl7e height of the building in relation to the surrounding uses. however, the perceived Impact of this project will decrease over tins because as other major developments occur, this project will represent less of the total light source. The ad j eacent Maim- Pior Attec t 8 (07,3D) bJt' rz9 ; r ` , w; K #J�r r , � ��rt ''�,1+�", ,�rw �S r 1�( h••�ll'i��'(I��' � ry 1 'i'i'1F' .�• w�� ,i,a , .1�5 �5 r L ALIt for emir r10# will be m1ti-stozy and will Tract i Mot a this s�► Additionally* a ; . : : ► t' bay ►a�rliaia �rfferctM, such ss *dd safety h• rrs • orista cad strians. ' BIN identities mitigation * , Which hav 'fib 1i�s�MMh thei�rpaCtx Of l�►gl1ti44, e been the conditiona of spproval . These include ` p �ttt#'e ier of light sources, in Conformances with the sign duideelines 6 Olveit the marry public benefits of the project as referenced in forog"ph 1, the Cite finds that the Incremental increase in light asasocift6d With this project is acceptable. 3 . IMIaM The proposed project includes the demolition of all existing struca uses on the 'Aite, inclu4ing elevian historic structures. Those inoiuft ono significant building, four potentially significant buildiiiVas and sic potentially district contributing buildings . The loss pg thee$* stmActures will have an adverse Impact on the recorded histo o� faetington Beach, the Vr' oposed Downtown, Historic Distrik, okd bn-rite historic resources. The c; ft has i di nti;fieed mitigation measures which will help lessen r5, thisik. . 1461 . i lwding complete docuwntation of the sits to be 5 inlet b1ic reeviow, an offer to dedicate facade easements, And A' . craw to ansurt that construction rribration impacts do not WOO wigs historic structures. An slUiSA "trd, locat'lon for the project identified in the ZtR is qMpocted to„havo less impact on historic structures than the roped pfbjoct, hcweever, such a location would not provide for an mportwat project objective of providing accodsible parking for the Uaia- Piss Phan I development. Likewise, a project alternative that preser**S '�be.,Clark Hotel Mould have loge impact on historic resourfts, beat could result in a project that does not most City codes for po Viking, otructures. Not mould such a strucstur* provide sdeequstO .btf 149 spaces for this project plus Main-Pier phase I . The aitetn6t1*49 reould not achieve the objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan 090 Local Coastal plan to the same extent, and would ' entail many of the arse envi romwntal effects . based upon the above consideerations, the City finds that the public benefits of 'the proposed project outweigh the remaining impacts on historic resources alto r mitigation. These benefits include provision of parking facilities for the Downtown area and Main-Pier Phase 1, which in combination with this project in expected to have a rejuvenating effect on the Downtown, the implementation of the visitor-serving objectives of the Downtowns Specific Plan and Local Coastal plan, and the elimination of seismic deficiencies . Attachment 3 4** (07730) T6 N r� � • •� !wi r�� y,w" y,r � � tier �+��o. a• ,r �,yy,, '' 1+.7, *' Mrtti r<�h.r' •'. -r , Ig Jt9 r r � �i r 1 ti°i M. n �„l. '1 T wf• 1 'y� .. , y, �"rJ r v';• M 9f I' ;+ epy fit"' ' ,K ; ur, +N ��+'ii:�w 4,. "`ri K , -; f a.,�r '1 IM ` L!, d ' P f 7 •r,�.�, , :.lr'.li. •� <, 'F I r W.1Ai1 � y i �r v •' , .� 'f 1,1 . 61, ;�' �'l��+A ',?(ram i , . `• 1'. P '�. d " r, _ ` ri.11v 94' .,ftr .•Y ,..+4+''H'::r r•'r+i.• .,, r .r•a • '. 4 • J !,?''�r Jai (yyrt }^. ,J, I f'r t , , t is t� mlatensnc* and operation of a 32,0 3 square 4�1•'< a r�r #e �Nrroiti building and S--levol parking atructv�re will not bm detris tal to the general welfare of persons residing Or 5 in the vicinity nor to property and Improvements in the 11vtsAt3r 'af sneh use or building. 14• 2 . 'scas►tial of the conditional use permit will not adversely Bffeet the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beacho r prop"al1 is consistent with the goals and objectives of the >, Citr"'"s 000801 pure and Load use move ��',. �• ' i+ Mtleaf silo layout# and design of the proposed n finial building and parking structure properly adapts the '1IP0 struatures to atroets, driveways, and other adjacent eo and uses in a harmonious meaner. Tbo 0 tipn and rolatioaship of one proposed use to onotber oG: si ' ,arc properly Integrated. ',;' �+ti1i,,.r,•'; 'a' fit; die access to and parking for the proposed connereial building and pe7sking sttvActure does not create an undue traffic problem. w Wlll = =11T no a 22 j 1. The proposed comet -Ail building and parking structure conform with the plane, ;policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Xlement of the General Plan. 2. Coastal bove'lop ent Permit is consistent Stith the CS suffix omit* taWiremwnte'r the Dmmtown Specific Plan, and other p eiaie" of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to 1• At the tie* of occ u►poncy, the proposed coma erci al building and packing structure can be provided with infrastructure in a manno t that is consistent with the Coastal Xlement of the General Plan. 4 . 'Tho proposed comiercial building and parking structure conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. (1546d) AITTOT LS w _r , 1 , Y� t�>•t'.lLoERV >ra, as..�tss 1r 1 30 PC -9*0solidatlon of 28 parcels into one (1) parcel Nn S I1 ration f oar purposes of co=arc i a i, office# and wwo Ish is d #UNWO 'with tbs $is* and shop* of psar I* that .t s of �9RI 01so has �rt forth : provisions for this type of land MOO b• well Of objectives for implementation of this type of 9• propetty was previously studied for this type of land use Nixed co=arciel/office) at the time the land use designation Of DMMtOwn 4psoific plan, District 5 was placed on the subject .' property* r, no Ono* depth, frontage# street width and other design and iMP tOVOMat fiaturet! of the prOPOW bubdivision are proposed to bo coastructod is co�liance with standardsN plans sod s ltiCations on file with the City as well as in compliance w the State Nap Act and supplowntal City Subdivision �rdi4#3lCe. Ursa num-2 ea_ as-if 1• The sit* plan, floor plans and elevations received and dated r 1900, shall be the approved laycut, with the s cati s ons des cr bed horeInt So piUal elevations along Main Strort shall be subject to Review siad approval by the Design Review Board. b, par OwWact parking spaces shall be permitted. c. Location of ticket booth in parking structure aball be depicted. 2, All Mitigation massures outlined in Environmental lsaepaet Regrrt Flo* da--d shall be complied with (Attachment A) . S. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be cO�leted a a. A Landscape Construction Bet must be submitted to the Departments of Cownunity Development and Public Works and most be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall Include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State lies axed landscape architr.ct end which includes all Proposed/existing plant materials (location, type, ,airs, quantity) , irrigation plan, grading plan and approved site plane and a copy of conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with the Downtown Design Guidelines and Section 9608 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. The not crust be approved by both departmants9t prior to issuance of building permits. (1546d) r r, ', .� �R�1�;4Z4� �J+ I�r I Y •i 51r 51 . ( • rr•1 .. M� �rl rn r.:. ��1 + »J �, 1 +k • 1,y,.•,,, • t, :L.it1 . 1, •,. ,I r M op % , J• .1 Ai'R 'b to + �lry+,YMS•' , •' a' ti x �r : � }�� t, w grlq l pic�'JMr �� a rox, ;CI •) L �, +r. I, Add , ti n�•4� ,' �1,5 'fi r 1 a p sl�l1 60 &SOOuded Alt t o a r aunty l'A rr a copy ,filed with the Department of Coasaun►ity, j ',•> •, „ a. An interim erhi and/or building materials storage plan 0011 bs ruhsitt to asr�u�re Odegvrate peaking is availabl* • - 1 o. oustomrs, contractors, etc, ,, diming the 's construction phase. 1p1104at shall submit a copy of the revised site plane f oer lano and elevations pursuant to Condition no, 1 for , pp tlar lilt. o, 9'looir plans shall depict natural gas stabbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , eater heaters , and central ,Ix r.l beating units, and low-volume heads shall be used on all ,1 spigots 4sd woterr faucets. to if foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant typo shall be installed as approved br the Building Department . 4 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and t,• otlies surplus or useable material, shall be disposed of at an off- site facility equipped to handler them. ` So Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systma shall be completed prior to final inspection. �. dovelopmernt shall 'comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, building Division, and rite Department . 1. The applicant shall meet all applierbis local, State, and f'arderal riser codes, Ordinances# and standards . d . ibrthsne detectors sball be incorporated in the parking structure per Fire Deportment and Department of Oil k Can standards* 9 . Firee Department concerns are as follows: •. Motor mains shall be provided for minism= 3500 OPT!(. h. Four (4) fire hydrants ages required. o. All retail portions, area the loiter level of the parking structure shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system pursuant to Huntington Beach Dire Department dpecifications, with central station monitoring. d+ Portions of the parking structure classified as open shall have a class 111 atendpips system with nose cabinets . Q=xTraigs .OF APMM - TUMMY 8"9*14 „lW Q?. 8 B 3@`� 1. The tentative parcel map received snd dated October S , 1988, shall be the approved layout . (194dd) y 1 Ir r•,�l,(� �t ;,r •� IG�F .�h 1�,*•+��Fi�,",l 1n 5,�1 w. 4r 'ORFAr `' ;wA+ ~ � trr ;1^;�7,S yy<' 1• r ' i „ 'v a �,1, �. �' 1 'i ' {r. � � ' vy 7 {'. ,IA��•RP�kt,Wnlv�ily rb�_�.M3+_w i M,..� .t�',I.+�I �A'�.� N...�. ,fir «.i. .. .,i' ,, .�:r .. .+N�r�: ' l AnOkliotMral TWO of vat" Fastueot/bilk , T!aj�i '. J„1 . '� +IIUM� .r�o r i•r. ��.ra� Ca■arcial Sw4rtantial fr"t Owly Alm 8*0 ,'':;'; ..�;. �d, ,;~':,�. i?a�o� al Merati�a bu►�R V" off to rei al lhbttors *do". First oil bow ,c firs! near, stern •ra front al torod 20's Comorcial Stucceid facade first oil be" OWN Yes 2018 Coroarrairi tnMto front wand Ml bow ''.',:; •ltror� tnYa�rntially ora , , + lid + ' " lost CMwftial bozo. 'Mat too first ail bM .:: 1,44 O&W Ara ''Yy SA I ill" ���,.a;r-0",,i'�".•�1'�'' ' 41 1 Yea go's Cmaraial Stoma alte"W lot isoOW oil bow Ifs►` no" from am So. Cal• �, k. vater Coo Mg. ,� �`` Jet Nwo•�t ar:i aal 1'ra' s"r ""red 0*1�1�a1 doom First oil born on ,� , .,, ,;fir+ �,'' �► .:,�' . ., Y1►e tC'r CorrMrro'ial Altered front daorr 3acewd oil bow f, I F� � , �� ,i ,',. a•, ' Tot to's Cosrore/al Faint, l attli viark F1 rtt eii 1001" '4 .+ ' and amino addW4 amp ainor I altorotims to building , vam ING rot Nee-classical Sip s owr transess. Miter Mltoratiana i door to socond floor to bsildinf: pmW Maowelaraieal I archi tocture; Historic Hotel frog lrt oil boas 6 1546d) AvTT M Nr �l t _ _ — _ ' '• y r 1 ... 4 y w , k �. � I,pe+7 �•+�', r , ,,r,;; � tea..,, �, . jy r• , l `" h tM ion beech depa"meM of community dovelop—g-A •! /���' !•r.r r,• '. •, 1 t• _ epok Y{y tiv. f fy,•; r ' "#V4 t1sual"t cord/Sion Commit 0e0e10pssnt October 18, 1966 COM1iITIONAL USX PWIIT NO. 88-34/COASTAL VMLOVKM PnNIT 80. 8 81i 27/TNXTATIVB PARCZL IIAP no* 88-385A IRCI11 OTAL IMPACT 911PORT 110. 88-4 k"OLAOM: City of Huntington Beach r��a Aced; stledevelopment Agency duly 39, 1988 To p6rsait a 33, 073 sq. f t . 2&= n p$INM a=: COW ercial building duly 19, 1989 integrated with a 5-leval p8rking structure of Z : Downtown Specific o pprozimateely 817 spaces Plan-District 5 (Mixed Use- and to consolidate 38 iota Commercial/Office/ into one lot and vacate Residential) an alloy. UWW121: southeast of Main street, sercond block (bounded by i Main Street, Walnut 25NS ,gam: Fixed Use- Avenue, Third Street Office/Residential and Olive Avenue) . IXISTINg USE: Mixed Commercial/office/ 1.9 acres (net area) Residential Staff s`ecx►do that the Planning Com,i.ssion take the following a�?�lgri s A. Adopt and certify, as adequate Environmental Impact Report no. 88 -4 by adopting attached Planning Commission Resolution no. 1406 with Statement of Overriding Considerations; B. ApProvG Coastal D►eveiapment Permit No. 88--27 with findings; and C. APpxove. Conditional. Use Permit Igo. 88-34 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 88-385 with findings and conditions of approval . ACft A•'r'eSQ r1 r'H E }Y ��`�`'�"''1q!?�• T}'"gip!{!►' •5. ., ' - 45°Z� �it1• 'p �ti ? 44049001 Use Pert No. 88-38 and Coastal Developatent Pe 4t no. Utute a regr:eat to constrnOt a 33, 073 square foot �r1 l/pitlee building integrated with an approzinately 817 space, 14� 1parhing stet eturo. The retail/office uses will be "ratod within the structure on the first anti second levels, fAds nq Knin Street, Walnut Avenue and Clive Avenue, The five--level parkin structure incorporates one subterranean and one roof-top a�rlting level, and is untended to serve the conmercial portion of th a project as well as the approved entertaiamnt center st Min Street and Pacific Coast Highway (Pier Colony) . vehicular access to the structure will be from Clive Avenue and walnut Avenue, with additional pedestrian access from a walkway through to Main Street. The proposed- plans incorporate landscape planters around the perimeter of trio parking structure, and over 8, 000 square feet of public open space incorporated in plazas, opan air co meicial steam, restaurant docks, and pedestrians arcades. The architecture Is Contemporary mediterranean, in accordance with the Downtown Design, Guidelines . ftntatiwe Parcel Map No. 88-385 is a request to consolidate all 18 lets within the block into one porcel, and to vacate the existing north/south alley. All existing structures on the block are proposed to be demolished to accommodate the project . A I,a ZNGJAM UAZ_E0JfJffg .j&JM 111RIZRAL PL&N DEIS Dined : Ecarth avA.,l4AlftO&. subjADt Pr .tX: 132 PLAN DESIGMATIOb: Mixed Use-Office/Residential ZONE: Downtown Specific Plan-District 5 (mixed Use-Commercial/Office/ Residential) LAND USX: Mixed Commercial , Office, Residential last at Hu 'd t_..PLQRS=: SAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed Us"ffice/Residential ZONIS Downtown Specific Plan-District 5 (Mixed Use-Commercial/Office/ Residential) LAD USE t Residential auth 09, Subject Exagew. QXXERAL PLAN DESIGNATION# Visitor Serving Commercial 2011E: Downtown Specific Plan-District 3 (Visitor-Serving Commercial) LAND USE: Commercial/office Staff Report ,- 10/18/n -2- (1436d) 001; �r4'•^T ` ��II � 41 . ,.y _ r r r r K ' J S , . . y r . �d •"Pow om r'�-,.t.W, r r r i ' ,M ''' r• i IN semi Wi�� t California S +� ire' �r l�rassota►tal Quality Act, - �.. Abe% *Stott go, 84- 4 was repo wed to analyse the " s IMPGOtO Of thd proposed 00enrarcia i-p arking structure. The iA e,aIWOooduce that was Sollowe is outlined below: Staff conducted an Initial- study and Ii detalrmined that an 212 would be ;:;;;� ,, . 1, x, ,: r•. necessary for the project # w t ol, 1088 A Motive of Preparation was filed with '•' ,; ,,. - the State Cloaring house to notify public of intent to prepare an SIR. ptomber• 1s, lose Notice of Completion filed with State Clearinghouses draft eIR available for ' public review and comment for thirty ,. .. days. (Comment period: 9/15/88-10/15/08) 90tobbr 18s loss Public beating before Planning Comission to certify Environmental Impset Report No. 88-4 COM04ts grad res nsos . regar4iftg DZIR 88-4 will be diotributed to . : ' sloA*irel se a >rs at the public hearing and will be ; isra�lude wd. 8o appeadt-a in the Final exit. r; 41rO=Wnt81 .Yepoct bstport No . 88-4 wan prepared by Sanchss `�' elals f ASsociates, Inc. , to analyse the potential impact of the prosed rarcfal building and parking structure. The document mustto adopted and certified by the Planning Commission prior to 01. 40tiolves Conditional Use Permit No, 88-38 , Coastal Development . `86-17, or Tentative Parcel Map No. 88-385. The gavir6rAwtalljoact report discusses potential adverse impacts in t1kea.:er4*$ of land use, aesthetics, light and glare, noise, air 4jutlItle kixtor#ggl ,Nerources, earth resources, housing and tceA9Vortst$Ng , a eiraitlation. The di tent, indirect and cumulative lopa+,ts of the p1coposal are addressed, as are the impacts of project • �Ytll�fl�ti���' Through t" use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the sl's, the WAJ*rity of the potentially, adverse impacts associated with the project can be reduced to a level of insignificance. There are ho"Voss son adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation xwasurres. These impacts include potential short.-term 1, land use isrrpects related to architectural incorapatibility, impacts from now light sources associated with the project, and impacts on the recorded history of Huntington Beach, the proposed Maio Street staff Report - 10/14/86 -3- (1435d) r a. j,. H M, .•. .r ,"°t" nyR'' !t 'Ay:Yy,i�•� '� °! �. 'e.�{� tw „t.',,,I -1V '% "a ad pp-site historic resources. sock of these ' { WWIa 8, b• lessened by sits ation measures sv.;p9ested is the S�f 1 i0reat report. and Staff reQcwsenolrls these be f.. 0"ht" late 'Alm project * hooding the adoption and implesmnt2tion of the reconnnded l : O' tdµes� approval of the project requires that a a of Overriding considerations be adopted by the Planning .00 owh 1194142. that th* eaoAoaric and Social benefitS of the propomW project outwellh its potent.-Lally adverse impacts. Prior to partif.estSon and adoption of th* IR by resolution, the Planning #ssion' asy amend the document, it should be noted, however,, thot removal of any of the recommended mitigation measures will rewire findings and Justification. The proposed project is within a non-appealable portion of the coastal son*, prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No . ds 2d and rax►ta#ivre �`weel Map No. 88-385, it is necessary for the Pleaning Co mission to review and act on Coastal Development Permit No. 35-27 . no proposed project will implement the following policies of the Coastal $foment of the General Plan: 1 Protocto encourage and, where feasible, provide vieltor-serving facilities in the coastal zone which are varied in type and prices . Provide public access to coastal resources . Improve the appearance of visually degraded areas . Coastal Development Permit No. 88-37 :way be approved or conditionally approved only after it has been found to be in c,4nformancm with the Coastal Element by makir 1 the following fiBdit�gs: a) LIAnd..U_a• Plan - That the development propose* by the coastal development permit application conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal b) $Qntw ,,$dSu],atiom -- That the coastal development permit applicant is consistent with the coastal zone suffix, the Do mtown Specific Plan, and other applicable provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. c) Ade{fsate 92gliCes -- That at the time of occupancy than proposed development can be provided with infrastructure is a manor that is consistent with the Certified Land Ilse Plan. d) Calii,ar ■-Coastal act - That the development conforms with the public access and public recroation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal. Act . staff Repoct - id,/ld/de (18354) A(4 r+�vyi r T tA;h � rrG r + .a14�" ' r4 fti l ,y' :'G ' v'. 1'.• IW I 'r 7 Y y r •/ , k��.k r i 1 `y r',y i$ r I r „r,.mob i �_•,� r 'h r r y t '�• ,, ri f X , x4'-: 3 ,� • . .,•." e, . wM 1 . . c.r•h .,l +. p 40 • :Nod' ' ,i IN 19C ated Ifithin the boundaries of tbo drh ► 1h MIXSnrin ton "ab {y ° ", �. ' !s ue applicant the pro act. We of the Downtown Specific Plan, iXict 5 (Mixed Ust--Co�rciai/OffiCefke i iri s ddnt ) . The following 0 a *ot�isq ConfOnAgace chart which compa�rea the proposed project to 0 ►elo at sta Ards of District S. yr Si, ISAU Provided 4 .10049. Profit setback S0 projection too pro jeactions into RCN proposed b. Parking structure ProRt Sotbarck 10 ft . 10'-13 f t. (Th194 Street) Sirk$49 Structure a do "tback 10 ft . 13 ft. to parking 4'10Rl1tbt 604 -olive) area C7+61b. Parking Garages Permitted by CUP fronts Third, except along Main Clive, Walnut Facades on Main 50% to be trans- Min. 50% trans- parent parent 467.03 Min. Parcel size 2, 500 sq. ft. 63 ,517 sq. ft . 4 .74,03 Kax. bensfty/intensitr FAR 2 . 3 (based PAR 0.30 - on net land a-ea Retail only • pl��s 15t) d47.04 Max. Height 6 stories 4 stories 4,7. 05 max. site Coverage No maximum Approximately 88% 4. 7. 06 Front Setback 5 ft . build-to 6 ft. to building Cc=ercirl lime with open (Main Street) commercial/ arcade to within 5 ft . Staff Repo;-t 10/16/88 -5- ( 1435d) d I Y. �, h� r'',w r , yy•. rrr ,'^I �' > 'wfr A1. �',Fp � r �, R &+4 y Syr r 1 • ''' rr :ia1 v r .,7 1°L'T'7 t, 1, '' Tr .i Y, 'Irr M r1 Ty.� 'r "Fl �. ;r 'y•.' M f '�• I r ^ i, Y �a rr 'r� .,'F (,,., ',r'h '1,h 1 r frFr 1�; • , �Y C rho w r .{ 7 •'� r r' •,'! ! t I , 1 � `, ..•,qh rf �'/ ay, I, ' 5',,hf•1,�. r Y •Sls � {� ��"r �1 •Nr'��+''` •' r•��4 ,�.r. ..M,a K,. ...iv{s •;t '•Ali ''d'1•4u,_ _•v 's• ... ■; ja,..'.,.', . ''rrY,aa r r 1h'1:. F„ vY.b R Kim. 5 ft. Kin. 5 f t room 7 M� nut) 417900 upper Story Setback Covered portion Third and fourth of all stories story structure above second, sothack 29-35 ft. ,•, suers • from second story *edit anal retail 10 9t• from .r Second story f aceft 4� 7.19 Public open Spaces 10% of not site 11.3% of not site area (68391 sq. (9,652 sq•ft. ) ,. ft. ) sin. 11000 1, p00 sq .ft. k s.f. at corner plazas at corners „. plazas , - +. . df 1.S1paces 240073 sq• f t . Retail w 130 .2 Restaurant a 50 30000 sq . ft . Office • 10 v Other Piro jecte (Pier colony) 553 TOUL 733 .3 all (734 spaces) Handicap9 10 S P a�era Coeepact not a l lowe.5 To be removed per conditions 9409*l&a. Parking Stall 90 degree 90 degree Size 8. 5 2 la 8 . 5 * IS Aisle Width 26 it . 76 ft .-6 in. Stall Size Ord j . to Wall 11 ft . s 1d ft . 11 ft. : Is ft . Staff 141powt - 10/18/98 �6- ( 14354) .. �• ' 'rl: J r",+,,r i,•. nr..4 ' M1 ;' r "r.,, ;r �1 Y "1 ,y'r'1'M `;r , "t' 1 4Yt,t ` *i�;i S�+'h',r r' , - ' -1; , r w ,f• l „r ZAN �; y /.•rr �Mit1. Y a ly r / '4 `I.T" 'y'f � "' ., "Ki, rod $Also h. •.' d 9: M' 5V. r ►, ar irtgreasl R@Q if more than 3 points of 300 spaces ingress/egresa r ° (Olive h Walnut) do. ftsixoter 6 f t . wed• at 1G ft* wide landscaping around level; ptori eeter= 36 parked . ears in. sczaea screened at wall at each each level level mat applicable. 00' ►sraioil ,-portion of.,,�he proposed project includes 32#073 s4pw!,� Oe t , of iiwA ittailo restaurant, and office ussoo in 4 . ,� 40 b ', 4.ateot, of the Downtown Specific Plant , Di4trict , ► f'r A t���, 'p .U" �mial core area', 'ot' the Downtown, and is 'rear: 'bi,. weliptai as a perdetstrlan oriented shopping street. Tbw "istlAglusqke on the mite include Commercial and of f f ce uses* WiVh sore residential unites above# ps,rkin4 areas . S 1`421 noes oaf Third St.je►t, and the temporary quarters of the I-.OUST rO; Ofelaut Avenue. Mane. of the esisting structures are sit; ',#Nsisati pl�T sate. All structures are proposed to be domoliabed to a the now structure. proposed, retail suites will front Main Street, Walnut Avonus, t, OUv* A b*r opening onto pedestrian srcadom- ,and public � p . alas, 146tat rant and office usts are proposed an the oecond floor VO4 ,, treot The comwercia,l portions of the building will b* intsicaUd, Tito the parking structure so that the building Opp"". Ow s unified wbole. 1 Thm packin.. structuro portion of the banding will consist of 5 levOis, Ir4tudinq osae subterranearL and one roof top level . The maximm- height will be 37 Zeet (apgrcximately equal to 3 stur iea) , with archftectureol Castures projecting up to 47 feet. Approximately $17 parking rpaces will be provided, lei of which are require4 for the cesmercial portion of this project, and 553 of which are { required for the approved sntertainment center located at Main strust and •Pacific Coast Highway (pier Colony) * %%us, approximately 83 spaces will be avellable within the structure for other uses in the Downtown area . The total .lumber of available spaces may be adjusted slIghtly to allow for the placemnt of ticket booths with adequate stavkinq area for two vehicles •, staff Report - 10/14/08 -7- 1 1 r .w 1 f• OA .A t 1p t of the parking structure complies with the City' s farst y adatted standards (section 9606 of the Huntington Hasch 09diRGUM Cods) , including 6. 5 'x18 ' parking stalls and 36 ' 6" wide � a sle ' No compact stalls will be permitted . Vehicular ac iss V, ill . tam #most Walnut Avenues and Olive Avenue, '' le atiae a AX1411ea J1ffiELdAAWQ2MM= Ln1 Tenants L 'I p96 40t site contolum- !6 existing residential -,=.to and 36 �;•' " that will bo displaoeed as a result of the project . The 10*2 0f the existing residential units is cons!. -leered a significant advorpe .-effect, bawever, the dtato provides guidelines for the mltigghiM .of such ,loss within a redevelopment area� Mitigation weaseres t►a*r been focorporated as conditions of approval, with the Nedweloprnt Agency compensating for the relocation of the present boosted Mitigsticn reeasur" .ivaclude the replacement of existing Units in equal or better noighbprho*ds, rents at prices within the fiftenoial seass of the persons disploceed, and provision of now units within r*ssonable distance to the resident ' s employment . 1 • . Wide r arcd to displaced businesseys,compeensation will be given -to al gets in accordance with the City of Huntington Desch Relocation guidelines. , Although the" loss of existing facilities, both► o8►srarerclal and residential, is considered an unavoidable 64l a Impact of the project, the impact can be lessened to an a eoptable level through implemntation of P+itigation measures. Ems U Mt 21R 88+e identifier three areas in which significant adverse impacts � of the project cannot be completely mitigated to acceptable levels. ritual seaun 1 a City has-identified a potential Downtown Historic District, vhidh includes the lea block nf Mein 8treeeet, the 300 and 300 blocks of ri#tit skreset, Mad buildings on the north side of Olive Avenue bvtwe" I.V4-s d Fifth Streets. The proposed district includes appraxiw,tely 83 pre-1940 buildings tha't reflect the early ,,small to" dorslarmat of .Huntington beach, 10 of which are contributing or significant to the District. Nines more of theme buildings: are potential contributors to the District if existing remodels are r:evetti6d. • state coterie requites 65% of the District buildings retain histearle*, choroctet Although the proposed Downtoun iistrict would not currentlx qualify, -many buildings could contribute with minimal conmetic work, There are eelerrteen historic buildings on the site that have been ian keld by the City of Huntington Beech Historic Resources Survey Report, and which site fully described in Slit 86-6 . The Most significant structure Is the Clark Hotel at 336 Main dtreeeet, which "Off 1port - 10/16/86 toe— (1435d) .. 1 r 1 ail so i otextial candidate for individual listing on the national ` ftgis p 'ot Historic Places. The proposed project will neoessktote this resaval of this significant building, as well as ten potentially glpnif oont oc district contributing buildings on the block. This 26@10 may preclude obtsiniag a Main Street Historic District in the future . r - IL �►t_f hi s i ter • Anotbost 41 of f icant adverse impact associated with the project Is the short-tend incompatibility of the project ' s twaditerrranewan-style i, architecture with the adjacent styles on the Rehabilitation Block " (300 block# west side of train) and the proposed Heritage Square block (380 black, oast side of rain) . Howev* r, the City intends to Change th0_ predeftlnant architectural style of the Rehabilitation block to include elements of the Downtown Design Guidelines , thus s Increasing the ' long-term compatibility of both sides of Fain t at. a Bost Office and auto repair shop In Heritage Squares loodiately north of the project will also eventually be k rebabOitated with similar windows and roofing materials as the . projeoto It should be gated thhst, should these architectural chant' -not he made# the significant adverse impact will he long-term. i The f oftects of project-associated light sources is the third significant adverse impact that cannot be fully mitigated . Although E` mitigotion ,m eamures will reduce light spillages eight lighting will still be-,visible . from adjacent property, and will contribute to 2vtot el night sky illumination. f` �tdff •* n la that the planning Comission take the following As and +ortify as adequate snvironaeental Impact Report No. l; SE�► by adopting attached Planning Comalesion Ikesolution Flo. t ` 1405, with statement of .overriding Considerations; � of Approvo Costal Development permit No. e8-27 with Findings; and }. ' C. Approve Conditional Use hermit Vo . 88-34 and Tentative Patcei 909 160e 88-388 with findings and conditions of approval . r1mysm F02 �►` .._C �DITIOM_M IMT. NO- RA-24: I. The establishoest o maintenance and operstica of a 32,073 uguaere loot eounraial building and s-►level parking structure will. not be detrimental to the general welfare of p6tsons residing or %,irlkind in the vicinity not to property and improvownte in the vicinity of such use or building . state Report - 10/16/80 -f- (183Sd) qP ,F 1�f� „Ir�R7�1 �r` r 4rt t1V`F, Y',o:; r ., .Y � '1 1 w� rl '•' �"�Tj •r��w i � +r h ` 1 A •t IL 1 Vt, '{ !• tSY r $ 'JI YV1 M 1t �^�Srr'i8 IOf W'+'�'w'w''i .( TA''' F1/d 1r S It"t1 of the 06viditiona l use pew t will not adversely affect t�1Mtal flan of the city of Huntington Neache 39 VW 9r0908*1 is coasistent with the goals and obJactirres of the ei ty e s Srrurrs l plan and band Use Napo >f'. lacationo site layout, and design of the proporied Y WNRWWWis&' ' 14ing so Pattie* structure properly adepts the r _ • �- . s+d structures to strait*/ ar drivwars , and other adjacent urea saes is a hew tmalous monaor . d abihatiod ang ralatioaship of one proposed use to another on the site are properly integrated. is fro smear to and parking tat the piroposod con wrolal building and parking structure does not create an undue traffic problem. ..gam P +.. T Bug an. t. The #ropcted•; cownrcial building and parking structure conform Ath tho p2ann, policies, yrequirwwnts and standards of the TM16601 141 at of ` the General Plan. Z. The Coastal Development permit is consistent with the C3 suffix goikinq roMireiiants, the Downtown specific Plan, and other sfovisione of th* Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property. S. At the; tioe of occupancy, the propoxod commercial building and par1ki struatore eats ba provid*d with infrastructure in a 41 s that is conslatent with the Coastal x1 mnent of the 0rr"Aftal, piano �{ dw buildin and parking structure conform wl ,Abe ' poblio $cases and pubic recreation policies of + dptif 3 bf the California Coastal Act. • Pr.�..!�,�.,. .r..;.�sr�va`t �. ' ' '�ATL� ��' � s�8rb 1. 'aroposod consolidation of 38 parcels into one (1) parcel 91*67- w"ation for purposes • of comeretals office, and Vkr 90 $has is in compliance with the also sad shape of vfdptr �+ sacary for that type of develop wnt. 3« r ssbotal Plan has set forth provisions for this type of lend use as **1t as objectives for Implementation of this type of Use 3.. The property was previously studied for this type, of Isnd use (mixed +aow-ercial/'of f ice) at tso time the land use designation of boatown $pacific Plan, District d was plaided on the subject propr►iz�. A staff Est - ififlf/f$ -10- (143bd) ' '` 01 -_ 7 i iow IeY AVIO 1 eti s� a h• frontage* street width and other design and k' i sdrrdMMennt roetures of the proposed subdivision are proposed lo to be struetod in compliance with standards pleas and 0pe�Mostious on 9116 with the City as well as In compliance ' with the State lisp Act and supplemental City dubdivision ILA � •{ " LIM , f a planol end elevations received and dated r .0 1048 r shall be the approved layoutp with the r 1liftiaad , ascribed hacreins a.' !'iAO -Io2evation+s along Noin street shall be subject to tatl4' od approval by the Design Review Board b. No o nVact parking ' spacas shall be permitted. F a. Locatioa of ticket booth in parking structu�ro shall be :,. depict g. Pole mitigation measures outlined in Environawntai impact Report ad-d ;"all be complied with (Attachment A) . 3. Mier to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a . A Landscape Construction got must be submitted to the bep+ xtAents of Community Dovolopment and Public Works and mot he approverd. The Landscape Construction set shall 1ealaft a landscape plan prepared and * signed by a state livmV4 landscape architect and which lacludos all * /exlstind plant materials (10catios, t i sire, t'ity)' ' irrigation plan, grading plan and approved site 014h,' asd • s of conditions of ap royal« The landsespe .ot n the11 •�o conformance with the Domtoft Design idt11ne* and motion 9608 of the Huntington beach 2WAUMSode. '1U set must be appiaved by both aparUents prior to issuance of buiidiaef permits* b* ' parOol MV shall be recorded with the Oraik" County 1e06fter.• and a copy filed with the Department of Caamunity ;• , di"relopr�nt. b», 'interim parking and/or building materials storage plain shall be submitted to assure adequate parking in available fb:t earployees• customers, contractors, etc . , during the pro jeact•s construction phase# ed. p►licant shall submit a copy of the reprised site plea, f 0or plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No'# 1 for the filer. ass* Detert "- 10/18/88 Ali- i14356j `; � f4 •` AV ee 7100r plans shall depict natu*al gas stubbed in at the � laaatiops Of cooking faCilitiesr water heaters, and centtsl beating Unit$? and low-Vo lusre beads shell be used on a l l sprats and water faucets . f . it fall-k insulation is to be used, a fire retardant t Shall-be installed as approved by the isui.lding 104MOV. 1poilr, such as unusable lumber, wire, piper and k' th6t BUt lus at unusable material p shall be disposed of at an ` ' + i-*its facility equipped to handle theca. s� *thilhtion of required landscaping aid irrigation systo" shall b�► cos:pleted prior to final, inspection. Tbo 6arreloy"at shell cosply Mich all applicable provisions of t, t ordistme Cede, 1luildim Division, and Fire Department . 78 licant shall meet all applicable local, State, and ;::W M®R40 Vivo Comes, 0t4in*ncGs i and standards . d ' -• Mare detaotors shall be incorporated in the parking etrboture per Fire Department and Department: of Cif. * Gas s . sta►> asa�sR. !. Fit* Department concerns are as follows: S. "ater, wias shall be provided for minimum 3500 QPK, i► sour (4) lire hydrants are required. Ov A11 retail portions, and the lower level of the parking structure , shall be protected by an automatic lire sprinkler otax ,puarMuOnt to Huntington beach Fire Department :.o�- speoific*UOW Vitt central station 'monitoring. -ions opt than parking structure classified as open shall tN ,clavx- llt standpipe system with hose cabinets$ ,' 'Y'h pl tita �an em continue Hnvirom:aental = �r, : �► tapaot Report Not Sk-dr coonss '. ltapraant Permit No. 88-37, Conditional Usti permit No. W-34r *ad Tentative Varcel Map No. 88-385 and direct staff '• i�oo r��� I, Att*Cb@Mt A - Mittgatinn Measures 3 . Atta*bftst B Statement of Overriding Considerations 3 . Cite Plant Floor plans, slev*tions ; ,, Draft Resolution Ho. 1488 Sxs tsd* staff Report laliiles -12- (1435d) F� r. I IV f, J►DUNDUM TO STAFF REPORT DATED OCTOBER 18, 1988 �1y1 y. I ' The 'following is in response to comments received Evr DESR 58-40, �t.. with togsard to the project' s consistency with the General flan: Section 2 . 1. 2 . 5 . 1 of the General Plan states one of the goals of the Open $pace and Conservation Element is the preservation and protection of aroaa of significant historic, scenic, and a*cheealogiaal value. It should be noted, however, that the: General plan ie, by definition, a broad range, non-specific document. The stated goals are meant to provide a basis for the further development of specific policies and proq rsme for the Implementation !' of City-wide goals. In this case, the City has not adopted a General Plan policy that calls for the preservation of historic buildings in the downtown area. Rather, the neneral Plan is impl4ml nted its the downtown area by the Downtown Specific Plan which f' Mete forth specific development policies for the downtown. The r proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Downtown • k specific Plan. In' recoguition of the fart that- historically important buildings do exist, the City has conducted an historic Resources Surveir, which Ideatifius sad analyses sunh structures in the downtown area . The Generol Plan identifies a Resource Conservation Policy of protecting valuable historic sites from thoughtless or unnecessary destruation. -It Is staffos assertion that, while the project site , Is identified as being potentially historically valuable, the pcoposad project will implement the Downtown Specific Plan as well as MaJaIr important objectives and policies of the General Plan . The i loss *I historic structures mould therefore not be thoughtless or � unnecessary. The proposed project gill impirment the following Oehoral elan goals and policies : i ,• II 2.2.2 . 1 - public facilities should be upgraded to meet (seismic) risk requirements . } 3 . 1,4 . 1 - Provide adequate ingress and egress to industrial and comp rcial land uses, as well as insure that residential areas are protected . 3 .4 . 2 . 8 - Promote the development of services and facilities necessary to support a tourist industry by: encouraging planned commercial development that will coincide with residential growth - promoting the revitalization of the downtown area encouraging development of commercial complexes as :enters of activity y � ,1 k `�' �,_ ' ^ �R Al e � y � 'l������ 5'. r�^ ��,'�+� }��z�,M `; y�r M�n�.,�+►+ rg� ^ 'f�wf �I�rl!r h1^f��� '�F ' Y +�i ;:'}7 Tay �` � Nr';i yt � •; �� �� • ,�a� � {7!!C 11 �� 1 a �� � Y ( + •R�� ,, � `r�' , i �+'1 . r , 1 ' tip � • re liaafbllm, provide In the 0*66tal gone "bich are Max and � � s� t►vM the �ppear �►re of visually degraded areas. • a, 4 �„ F ,�,'�,'�711 I+�1 fir,�'S! I ;F 4•• t�i1 fi�. �+ ^ ,�. ,fir.;• L, w,,,, �i•, ;,., r, Ail a , ,,o r J t 01 S h , T r y nvyi y, .L', , r 1'r•� IJ fc 1 ' �1. Y• a = �.i!y', . t. V +F� 1 y ,. a� ;r, r s,fr ' � .t . '*. �M'd'Ik . '4M., Ny#,•, r .b!•`r. . �q`►,!'J!R"1r.� ,1 .� • �. :�•, .^ • 1 r ..,i w�M.�J%' i USOLU �� 1'. A ?i0N OF TXX CITIr ODUMM OF THZ MY OF MVMTIUMN WACS, CALIPd11NIA+ J1WPT1*0 RNMI UINTAL IMPS' *~ 90. 80-4 707► TUB PARKING S ACID (,�RCIAL 13VILDING TO aR LOCATED BOUTOMT OFF MAIN Xavifpamsnt�il Upset Report No. 88-4 and spie'ted ostitlomonts have kkon prepared; and Tho City Of ftatington Bosch was the lead a enter in the01 airstion of the ItAvi�r*Miantal Impact Reports and ► lCgoons and agencies wishing to respond to notice doll !'ion9e ►e hMard by the Planning COAIIPiss . ri either t�b written notice or during a public hearing on October ff, ad *nab responses and commute are were wade were dhl noted asd responded to; and ���� ���,�t►� Ail poisons and agencies wishing to respond to otice .0". .ba** t1som beard by the either t written notice or during a public hearing on November 7, and such responses and during as were made were duly rioted and raspondod to; and Ai ,, ARM• aM I'x RESOLVED by the City Council of the ottir of mubtington Beach as follows: LION Lo The City Council does hereby Eind that R,a► , rntsl Impact Report No. tt-d has been completed in lJow r with the California Environmental Quality Act and -irstate and l000l guidelines therefore. ,f AWTltN T. The City Council boo considered- all 8104ficaut off ets detailed in Mnvi.ron"nt+ll Fact Report Ma. 84-i4 s together with existing and proposed aersou res to mitigate such ailMificaut affects (see Attachment A) . NW.VUW 3. The City Council further finds that tbrough � o atatica of the aforementioned sitigation measures, of the potentially adverse impacts associated th iicity s sod project can be elimiasted or reduced to a l*gel Of ISt galficaaoe. UC'IZON i The City Council finds that the benefits accruing to the City, bath economicolir and socially• by virtue of Implementing the Downtown specific Plan, Override tho +a tieatoble; effects detailed is Znvirommentol Impact Report No. sa-# and the attacbed statement of overriding considerations (sire AttacWtent 9). and the City Council of the City of MmUngtoo $ each does hereby adopt and certify as adeq ato tavironmoatal tmpset Report No. 88-4 . I I. ,l i•` r � �firTx,:['YI��F7m,+Mr R . - �91"' �'��. '�; '�� i^ i�:;, 4.'��, �iil����� �.' r••�,� ,ti.,s �� �14 rti��,i�' ,"�9°���, 1•+ �• Y r/fVY '{y".' 4t � � I��pf�/IY�j{'A�, �'��.�� ♦1 ah r PXT T, 'i �r f Y\am„ h r yQ '��r ..A�I�R,�', � Y� � '` .v ,.t`�'"Yy �, •y Y j�,, roe � ,' 't� iy� q'' ` v„t �/� M:y•i+e r 1 ;.'° :' 'e r �'t�• 7- '� 1k71�1?�':,�� /� ALoo 5i� }yrS�Y ,1 (} r, _ t. f ,.• .} � .yF��1' h, ,�1,/�, 11��,',�' •� � 1•: f .e !w ,�' � 'r�. 'f 1• ./ 'Y � r f Tho Clay Clerk is horehx Authorised and 9J10 with the office of the COUAtY ClSvk a DOICO tog Zoriron"Atal impact Report No. OS -4, as joatiioe 21152 of the California Rurironmental ADOOM by the City COWWi l of the City of at is roqulor Ming thereof held on the , . Y °^ f•�^'gf1�J�fj C,,"rl�'," �Y�. :k Y i y.'1�, r 1 � �l Mayor N4�`f hf City( Attorney Gw J INITIAT'ZD AND A'POOVZO_ 1,. uiitsator t ti} I ' a lip yipt�i �� ����,�.� y rNtc�•S, l'�9.��'1;� ,/fir 'r i r - t ' r ��k�>, j� ate+ }'��� r •'Y.�.�, A r e ^� 4y4�1 mot If htrk- F4 0444 Sri Lingo ' r <. • Off r j ry 13 00 v of r�7 !r X i" b .yc �./� � Mi r• r ��' 1� r"'';�Nss� � � '-1R�, �fi;y�t'i�'ji� i � „ r? �i• *� �lj'j`�� i .i f w � �L` SY,i�`�a �i' •••i ye,�, �f i'+Y ' '��w � ;'t •"y i � � i yy `14d F 'yfd�Y: •j5 � , }� ..,,,yf J�y,� ,5d♦rw i 1 w r .11 Nit , vy ,.r r,�'Y• ��,�w I "' ,r.�..�at�'y}.� r Q. '-• r"�Sh _ � 1 yf ��:.�' ^' N r' y . • ;Rc n ti a, i ,i, fin. 1. w ik l +•Yi i :- y, Y 'F '4 I y� ix MI 1 ` aW. ,lh, .{: 'rn►yF It'a n4' t r.1 . � u T'h .. "ter•�'.y'_ _v•.: • ... m,.car a�rii• h ra. t1rf, document is to try WmLt 41 ccmmeat@ received related 4 Carr �S�o� � .4tate • � M* rat. . d•, o� for ►� � *. p ! , of acre apprr� it1ri ■p#a*, It"� t, t f s respe+ to oe0■ernts lit accord*=* T�Ai$Cfg of the CM (NAftlirasS y 111►o IWaft iipoeowrntaI Report for the Vtojeat was distributed to various r: Ift ovncles, responsible sonnies, eltisens Sroupas and interested *14hal F. The report wag made avafalabl• far public review and cosomut days. Tho public review period for the Draft fit ,.; ;; 5 b ► the State Clsarin&ouae commenced on September 15, 1988 an4 as Oataber 16, 1988. jU City of Smtiagton eeaob has utilised several methods to solicit input ca the Draft SIR. These wthods iuclwMd the preparation and distribution Af d Notioe of Preparation distribution of the Draft SIR, and proparation s and "aft batien of the Notice of, cavlet:ion. ti 4 MUss of Completion ryas filed on September 15, 1988 with the State of CoUfernia Office of !boning and Ressaash. i a 1 � �, ./t1 Ara .,�'1� r �,, 7L� v- :Nf." r s'�{ 1� � T`j•��� i,�� by ��F(i�((y4y"� y ,r I ♦ r �'",~+.•r''��,�� ( „AM .�,,p , � n„ y,�yi, t,{ ,r.M.."1 •F 1 ��� 1T J' � 1 •• � � iMtur�r „�,k��1 w•," ►�, � � ' �r r��,�� ��'a'�y�,°�{'�4 ,�,q,Y t 1',�' {'�r � IIy iH 'fIgM,YM y3,r �y, � r�rinr 1.' l r ,h rcv, .{, •t � ^� , f i�•, " 1 r ��,�� r f��s4' ;.� � .,i, I�! r, ably �y�Y� J�? {,' �k.{ 41tiY !� "'P"�,� i1 ? .e rl i� r r• ��.,,'1•,1�y � ' F • r At ` �. i N+'y I ^7 ^�, i'II.f r �i ,6,w i.• �,� I n t � P��✓�ifli Jii 1 � 1 n �{l�C 1 ICI} 1�'F1�1ry �1 ,,��11((��L,,• � ' �., ��1 (F �1 fxk I I;I✓•.w1; � y,., .,',r„y� :�4„ .�:',`,al,.r ��4L,. r. as of Orgy I?. 108$0 omt eimd ir► AMAO rt � I NAA m rrd and 1 , r ALqppwg y nswbdU4, he ns $re presented for •> ��' . J � ti1 4 a 41PLaaant eavi tol lemma. ! f ,��)o,. , �S � ;pjj,'M,,•T 1�1�' �,j�le�6 t '�'�• 4 ',.A.{f, �. ; r. ' yr1 F. ,r ii� 1• + • A, �l ti. yy i r! 1� J,�i �i' it : • , , r w y 7-y' . "7 JR1 , $tip) low Yl 0,00w, 01" 14 A�,A tible 0 4 Java On IL.4 loss 14 1918 of parks =4 raj e R .. , + .. �•I us 1-10 ISO'.1968 0*44 wb"I* lo"h Aft. t WMA-9 md4Ahj --fUstorical SocletY op Oatobor 17, 19$8 H2L2 1-8 x aw --7 -004W 14, 19f.q hK 1-20 .fl, I'VP In 11r r l ♦- 1 1'. r r • L J I Y .1 1.r I i Y. 1 14 1 r l♦1 1 W 'W—l M 1 / . 1 VW• r L W W w+ 1 • r ► •Y Y V - a. V W. iffiwmwmw�MGM MU Of i 4WING AND RESE tiN 1 gear sees? A COL October 14 a 198t l III Halm city of Untr,ebtou beach We 8tr d., JuntisStae Peach, CA 92648 ( 1 I MJ89t1 111Y 88-4/i:owarcial-Parking errucr.t:: e on Ehe east 200 bjock of Main Street' bta 68050319 i 1 ' stagy Clearinghouss hm suhmitted the above named drdit Environmental Impact Est (alit) to "lected stage Kencies for review. f1re review period is now closed MW the aMMtr frw Wn rexpxoing apency(ies) ts(aro) enclosed. On the oncloeed' notice of Complotion Beret you will note that the Clearinghouse has chocked the PR 1 AINIAlft tMt have Clam nted. y1eass review the Notice of CaVlotion to emsure that yvus 90MUt pvakags is complete. Tf i.:;'ie comment packWo is not in order, please notify tier ftrte CUarxnphaase imme%siatrely. Remember to refer -to the pro jerct 's scot-419it ate C!lsiarinoouse matnr Leo that we gay tiespond praVt.lyo il PUmn that taction 211n4 of the California Public Resources Code requires we edible ap my or other public ogsnoy *hall only make substantive OPIR 2 calsmas regarding three activitios involved in a pra�oct which are withk an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be ewried out oc approved by the agency.'' O=Wt saql also rr",r�.iit+dd by they wkion to •uWort their caarnents with ap"L q, 44iii-tatite. Tmrse its am loromlod for your use in preperiny your final MR. Should You OPH S n� itoxma►tion or clarification, we recmwnd that you contact the oonttrrntin1 Thie lottar ngwl s tnat you have coVILod with the State Clearinghouse review x ttii�ts for dr environmental document I,, Pursuant to the California QPR 4 j tty Acto 8'1we vontact Keith Lee at 916/44"613 if yW We any , q1 t �itq We srwiroimntal ,nwiew ass. / A I . k* 01 wit Mete" IN$ NO low" .r. y ;60 ry OCi-14-'66 FRI �6110 TEL tJC : :1►5 K F 2 soft OWNS"do + Air0urvas A*W4Ny Of CU KO M IS Mommerandum M f• Gordon $glow & wistsDt Resources Feare►tary hen ��rt of '�tka a� RealMr�r 64pa Dftft HIX 86-4 ($ram 88000319) C +oial,/Parkiag Structure on the want MONO block of Maio St. The draft 8I2 arefarevood above door not odv4uately analyze the DPA 9 f is rt�rcfon of mut siea3floaot effects on histories resourase is daMClta�, tiodtaa teach Ism Aarbloular, the draft S18 roller too heavily on the historia rnsaur survey report propsred for the City by Thirtieth (treat A rabiteatel in 1087 grad Ignore* the follow-up s�.:udy done by our staff is %W. 19880 a oapy of which is attached. As a result, tb o pPFt 2 draft 112 undereat i metes the s ewer ity of the s ign i f i cant of foots that the projeat would bav* oa historic rescrirces. we ovaoludad tart the site of the proposed projrot is -tithio a biartorto district that smears eligible for listing in the Vatiowl Rselwiwr of Historic Places. Tte draft 212 should have . divaWmrd the sleaifloant effects of the ptojab , oq tijis dieftlat. Tho P"Jeet uwId .-tweer the oantinuod exf steaoe of DPs S %a distriot bar erlisinatiag an important part o it, The draft 912 shw1d beve, *va)1uatAsd the offeat of the pro je;at on that National ]tisUr *1idi,bil.ity of the district. ?be dyed HIS divomoses cumulative effents that this ag other OftJoats ww1d lave on downtmm, The discussion poista up the s oasli a o f addrossing tbasa effmbs la ar series of efa dle- pro 112s. The lei-term ouau l at ive effects of -those proJeats ow be and 1"17 identifled and amlyned if the Citypregared 4 �, prebe�tu a RIX for all of its doowDumw proje ts. This is ieal.ly trust tsooure We sifoilioaat effect as the district as e isbale is liktly to bar more drssatio then the effect an lte iel�vil #.s. 2�0 draft 232 sbould be rawrittm to inolurdo a dicussica of our flw s +e ad Uwa reoiscularted for review, This revised drift waujA VrOVIA* fwxWbsr l eforhartion that the City a w3A we too Adov a ro We of devwtogeeet alternati• ew.. sow of .vb1ob would O+A 8 trAdlYes mtlelpstsd eiplftosnt affou" as blstaria pra rti" to • as Umifi lavol and thu proererrtre these pl'C rtin for M N�7-14—'W FR I TE1. NO s 41: a190 F N — OW sta#f anal3ilil.11 *as a ratter of public recoW 1cal before the lgltial aUAV of this prQJ0Qt. Our f'indilWb Wert pr"GGted to th. City plamintd department by letter in Way mW to the City' Counoi 1 (actiag as the board of the redevelopment affenoY) at a pablia ■ wtind in June. ft3y have bran amintioned In at-her corn Pmdenae sinow and wore the xub jecrt of an arti.ol.a in the lawl newspapor. The failure of the draft 312 to inoludo out fin4i"s, alresO so w*11 known in Huntington Beach, &me that the City oam>aat rely on the draft BIB U make Imforned and e�wip�rioB dlidi'oioge. ....J al i i eta Jaiistoria Preservation Offiorr I�baah�wat . an: Joba Br tribe',, Mayor T" he*ps I Mayor pro tdo. Was Beenisterrf City Council. Ruth Pi.alor, City Counoll. Peter AVWM+ City Council Jaak Xe%17r City Co>unoil Gram Ninoblell, City Counoll Paull C>tt *&- Citrr Adulaintratur lake /ldww, Aotigd Planning Director Asrbars, Milkoviobe 816torlo Resources Board • Apr �.r Ck;T—tea—' FR I 115: 11 I D.-:oZL—f�:•; WFAIPS-0CMA TEL N0:916 323-37 UL 90 PM e 01C)PI N blugm�JIA1rl OFFICE "IMpI10 MRgURVATION 0 111 iAT P"94 A161) 114204ATION pow op"m 5 f ill rii�l Miil202 POTENTIAL f HUNTIN TON BEACH , CAL . out I rmwwftmwjm „ rmmpo + �t� 22 _ 4 20 ?� ',&1 Y 0 Zia Als F7. •2J 0 , oil 0,• 21 It Id •- .o� * 2410 Sam i� gal I zip 121• • w lit tas � � 151 # � 119eL 3 * � i�2 F7 121� • Ili PWACM COAST NVI Y* -. . , she KEY It"" n� r UMWTAIN MMrT 1 u' r• , it 1 r • Y4� J Wei� Historic Resources Board CITY OF HUNTINGTON EEAC V poa; Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, Cali forria 92648 October 13 , 1988 Dr. Victor Leipziij, Chairman Huntington Beach Planning Commission Huntington Bosa►ch, CA Re : EIR 88-4 Dear Dr. Leipzig: The Historic Resources Board accepts '-h•e basic conclusion of RJR-1 88-4 which states that the significant effect, on the city' s his- toric reisourres cannot be mitigated . Its members balieve , how- "Re 1 eves`, that some additional, inf or:naticn .could be appropriate for full u,iderstanding and evaluation of the docum,-�nt. Therefore ve offer th6 followi ng comments . HISTORIC EVALUATION The Cali,forni% Offf.ce o,.0 Historic Preservation+ believes the area itich inrluder. this project to be a National Register-eligible historic district ( aee enclosed copy of map and lettar) . This information was not included in the: EiR, leaving the impreenion that the 1986 Survey Document was the only available information . Since there is an obvious differences of lORB opinion between the two , we think that the Planning Commission must consider both possibilities . The Commissioners should be aware that the area is believed to t ) signifiean;; by the authority which will make the final determinatic-n of National Register eligibility. r ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY WITH EURROUNDI NC AREA', The project, as designed, is not architecturally coanpact�_ ible with the adjacent. areas . The sugg,•stion that the hii - torically occur !te plan foi- the "rehab ((lock" be redesigned to watch the grcmoeed project P'!,:.'+,her damaxes the historic fabric of the district, an does a su.'-i%&tion that other nearby historically. significant buildings be re--,addled. "lies* recommendations are clearly ubacceptable and shy' old be e' imikieted as saving an even gr*stOr iMpact on tha hi stori,: t asource represented by the com- 01ercial core than 0%*t, of the project. ..�- CUMULATIVE IMPACTS vim IIIST ROC AREA Those imradts have not bean addressed in sufficient depth. The obvious: .!.oss is to thop historic building stack, 'but Perhaps Dore impoxtrnt is the lots of community identity, and the hit! d •salsa upset of sUoh a drastic chancte.. Social science doaumecnta- tiom should be included which addressea the soei.1l concerns. ONE* R 1 r� 1 � mil` dAT I ON$ The proposed mitigation does not begin to address the severity or the full nature of the eff�acts on the ;ultural anvi- ronwftnt of the olrigir.691 city and historic district. It addresses only the loss of tha phy3i.ca►l structures and not the cultural and MR0 5 social losses . At a min;roam, additional docum6ntation , including oral history should be p.,epared . It is not inconceivable that ad- ditional social services might also be required for the adjustment, of the area residents to each traumatic changes . ALTERNATIVES TO THIS PROJECT 04 . 4 Alternative site : Use of an alternative site for parking at the inland edge of the historic area would encourage NR1� 0 l the flow of foot traffic through the Wain St . area, increasing its economic potential . This EIR does not address those social and i economic benefits . 04 . 5 Preservation of the Clark hrtal : This structure is considered eligible for the National Register by th States Of- f ice of Historic Preservation end should not be lost without seri,- "FIB i ous consideration . Further attention should be given to the eco- nomic feasibility of a smaller scales retail/commercial center -j which includes the hotel . 04 . 6 Design alteration: The economic feasibility study of this alternative, including the necessary restoration of mano of the structures has not been prepared , It Should be ordered "on 8 and reviewed before this alternative is discarded. The advantr,ge of retaining the sense of placi expressed in the standing stru;- tures cannot be overemphasized. In light of these concerns we recommend that Planning Commission not make a decision on this project until its members bave requested and receivad more economic information regarding the altetnatLves to this project . The potential damage to this iiRR 0 historic fabric: of our city would be irreversible as well as tragic . We beliave that a combination of the recommended alterna- tives to the project could retain much of this resource and still fulfill the goals of the Specific Plan for the downtown. f a I I If, however, the Planning Comarissiin must make a hasty -, dectsion, we ►irge them to give qualif Led appz -oval to this FAIR, re- suestlag further �-r.alysis of the altor"nat,iv4e to tier project , ane to withhold tppYoval of the entitlements until thiL data 'irl ava'1- abl a rnd reviewed by the erne ral public . We firmly bt 1 ieve that a Statement of overriding consideration to aipprove, the project is without sufficient grounds in this cases and recommend that it - not be made. A large parking strticture may be needed in then immedi- HAS 10 C . area, but its benefits at this location do not Justify the lass of 0 significant portion of the historic commercial ccore, nor do thoy justify the potrntial cumulative affects which may ulti- a&Ul.y result in the loads of the entire historic district. f' ' r `- rbara Milkowich, Chairman V, CC : City Council , Planning Commi,ss ioners , Ke) iy Mai.n, Ruth Lambert, Don Napoli } 1 I f 1 3 I ' I I 1 , a 1 1 1. r 1, BMW Ir, 1�TATt 0� ►4 �'OIeM++� Tt4► i360062 DIUKkiUlAH OFFICE Of 14iffMIC FRr' AVAYIQN •kgfMtN'1'Of PARKS AMC NL1'g1f/11`M Mary 13. 066 Mr. Michael C' Adams Iftpar'tneat of Co$lre*Jk%T DevelopUont +Eltr of iitelrt�tor�toa litae;tt kip Maio dtretat mostriaedtop Beach Cal 92645 Deer Nike: i was glad to have had a cbance to most with you . and netaabers of Your sta►tt last uerk 'to discuss historic resouji-ces in Huntington Beach. We iron Lato two major guestIOU3. First, does HUDUngton 9ea0h a&w e a commercial district dowstown that qualities for the XisZ10011I Repister of Historic 1FX0,9es? . •nd if so. 40 the cit7ms co"gat procederes for a►bsessita@ Impacts on the district comply w1th environreatai laws? The .irreentoery of historic resources for the city, while providing tam* useful inforaea►tiorl does not atdress the first queStLao 41V40U7. The final report sonatirte:s views a district as a histotric resource and sometimes as a planning tool. For that reason the report otters conflicting judgment$ about the exact l"ation of a com serciarl district and the buildings that Contribute to it. + l eras anxic-as to yet a first-hand view. After our meeting Maas, 10ur g ia+rbara 113l1oVLGhg arid guy Qualardo site are a %Our Of downtown. This was aallghteniog but still left unanswere6 grts,914as. Sio I the s went through the area more systsomktivailf b7 my"It. locating contributors and d,:-�awiag tentative boamd,trLese Y cotsetlmded that a 1leaL�:rev-erlilllble district does exist downtown. The enclosed map (wLtb attached explanation) P"Tided rocs details. That leavon the question aril cowpliance. , t talked wit% mans fteataborgo bead of our eawtrenneatal emit, about %be procedures should follow. as stoUd. thot t:k* 1941 4 r t i past report d s bet adequately dlelp1 with p ;ram*M� r bNrUse At deosr not Anearperate informatlow t"a, "sop ..# **Twee. 210 GUY moods to same two addliti,osAl steps 1100641ettely. FLrst �� �K.it i+err�ttit su •tsittl►1 dibtt" of �A.*14ete aisealteiis fd ri. 2'be Study Imuld ow up ew the Allwert#ry sod my .• Its maim p06i would be to 411tio mine UM eitret K' r i ladaries of a historic district and to distiagdiah contributors t~ aoa-costrib tspas. pecauae so muck has bees done alreadyl very little adoltiould work would be needed to c0191plete this stesf. Than the City mast props are a "focused Mw tha t specifically discusses how► 40wrstowa plans will impact the historic dishier. Alter Komp1etL%9 these steps, the `ity will be in compliance with the Cr ;ifornia SaWLronmental QuaMr Act. i The City If also proposte►11 to as,* 104eral fUDds to carry out soma of Its redovelopmeat plans. As a result, it will Deed to meet a requirement Vesd*r Election Of of the National Historic ' Fr'esrrvatioll Act that it identify historic resources and evaluate Impacts before proceediag. The step& QVtliaad will do roost of the way to neetiag that requirement. It you have 'questions about CZQA or Section 106l please address than directly to Dr. Kreatzberg. He is such more conversant team I xrlth recant interretatioas o! these laws sad is in a be iteyr position to glvs you advice. He can also outline our continuing responsibilities under Section 5624.6(j) of the Public Resources code. In the meantime please loop orer the enclosed Dap and tde � attached explanation. I think I have all the addresses straight, but some of the lot. lines may not. be quits rigat. The boundaries and the status of each building are, of course, still tentative. Wrom all I can toll. the City is in an excellent position to conserve and euhamee this important historic resource as part of 1U efforts to der&1op an attractive coiamercial area downtown. If You bava any questionso please let me Rnow. ., Sincerely. boiaeli4 S. Napolig Coordinator S,Lu%e Historic 1lexources Inventory haelasu Aviv eesrbara xilrovich Rana blaisure heir Nicoll Rams hreutaheerg LeaatMa Woodward '001- I I i GECI1QE ogUKINEJI/bNr� IR'A � IA ge DFFICI OF 14""111C fAOURVATM AM t CW MOM AM moMIA 4M �`1AL NATIONAL P�T�N , Ht�NT INGTON BEACH �A� 02 LLO LJ ouve 323 224 i I 3j 71b ' 211 all$ xl3 • -p2� v4 �i M210 $' A 20 o WALMUTON 17.4 r� � 19 �IzslSlt �19 � • �1Z 11 • s0 I tz I•�.9 . . i 101 pAcsc KEY • r1f � .1 I' 1 • I • •Ir Ilir 0 +1 Potential National Register District 1 Huntington Reach. CM. P. it 42 at,"2a al. Huntington Desch appears to have a downtown c osr,merr-i.d district that It eligible for fisting in the National Rog steer of Historic Macau. A historic diszrict--like a buildings struttori; object, and mite-'is a type of resource. ` Altl%ough its components may lacK distinction when viewed Individually, together they fear m a distinguishable entity +th; it provides a visual link to the past,, In general, n district Is 0 rYinetd by its 03 CV -••cliar actor,latices confiii®m, azd **rttributoret. To be eligible for the National Register, a district mast meet specific standards set up by tne federal government. These standards are not always obvious to those who have not worked with them. 4 .1otgriptigs. The Cistrict in downtown Huntington Beach represents commercial growth in thn city from the turn of the century to 1936. It includes buildings from each decades most of whion were (and are) retail dusinessea. n 7 C2nf The boundaries of the district encompass, ttlosa buildings that have tha defining choracteerieaticis. Boundaries roust be drawn carefully to include only those buildings. Usually thane is a Central dare (Main Street in this case) and watringeersO goring out in seve rk 1 directions. Near'•a, fors example, contiguous buildings • continue on 'Walnut past REM Street. The boundaries an the attached neap are still tentative. On further analysis, they height be extended to incitider the pior, its small ancillary structures. and the building at 319 Pacific Coast High*by. The inclusion of 225 Fifth Street is snothe:r possibillty. roglISCMutgCor The components of a district either contribute to Its senses of time: and place or they don't. The Hationul Register allows for no middle option, such as •would be a contributor if r eStorred.9 A building may contribute: *van if it does not reatgjn all of Its original appearance. It stay be modifled on the around floor and unchanged above, or completely changed at a time later in the histori* prriad. There Is 130 uneequivocal rule about hot► MUM of (sir~ what *laments of) the appearance from beer hlateric i*wiod a building roust retain for It to contribute. In tha oars* way, the percentage of *ontributors needed varies train district to dMtr l*t, d*pfndin$ (among other thing*) on the intrusiveness Of the n0ti-4 lntributer s. As a rule of thumb, two-thirds of the "NoMent* of a district crust contribute for the district to tre rlldlbM, f6P the! National Reriett*r. As Shorn on the attached Mom. eesOM"I.OrS dreatiy 'outewrlrllrer ton-aontribute►rs in the e111strist. Ift judgment* remain te,ntativeeg however. Each slrpuld be Mw"Irook6d. The map also show• several buildings designated by . ti BWK. The** (MoWe than this othnf-s) treed further SJ 1 i y/IWyy 'R ilunti�gton �c� �-bjtorrcel ictv.. n 0(PA;jrM jtyr (W c4M""J"'ry D"Et-ON'tNT October 16, 1988 Pw1n,1wrlya pwraroN ',aar i.eipsig -:GAAVV , Vlanning Committee CA of guttington Beach 288 Main Street Huntington aeaChr CA 93648 Us Draft SIR 88--4 and the subsequent action proposed on this pre4 ^n M. To Often solutions to problems are not solved to their best ability because tho correct: problem was never identified in the first plane. � 1 feel that the Draft EIR 88-4 is inadequate because it does not &Mrt a, -'-he correct problem. After reading the Draft EIR 88-4, 1 had a di,Lficult time trying to �6n"s id+antify tho cor.ract problem as stated in this document. The report 2 talks about structures with no regard to people. In the matter of structuree, the report states on pagos I and 2 that"` 'tbe downtown specific plan was adopted by city council, in 1993 with the intent of, 'recognixing the rich downtown history afi a central focus dNM of the City � a ^iviap recreational and business activitieu, " rf "the 3 rich downtown history an ai central focus" Lefers to str.uctuxesr it se►e to have no intrinsic value vince Hot itage Square has been strr±cken fionn the list of Anticipated pr.ojectse Whc: has Ehe Draft SIR 88-4 proven in relation to atrucyures? was the intent to prove tocfcy council that 1) there is a . rice downtowns hiotoryr 2) the history of downtown would act as the central. focus of the city ' s civic, recreational and business activitiesr or 3) historical preservation needs to be defined as the relocation of structuces? As an historical evaluation, the Draft SIR 86-4 has nr)t *win considered thrr position oi`• the State Office of Historic piereervation vbich has emoted that the area roughly from Pacific Coax atghway to ja+at beyond Clive and from 3rd Street to 5th Streets is a National legiwter• ell ible historic diartrict AA.U - itil-sts tafte X11hQUI AU, 9MALs -in tickence to gaR 2 of the Draft zxR 88-4, tbare i® a sentenca Vk_ AtA n a "t s �f� ied parking structure and associated raka r.1 f fi 1 ► � . • N&V4 1 mis804 sonotbing here? The WOO. "this as tho tat wbtd in the senten::e should refer to a preceding ssatazao - bu4 x cannot find anything in the "precedLn. 9 sentencer oi, from the sk'Att or page one to this pointe that aentf ons a parking strut kum Tres, the parking structure is xt atibneRd in the remaining bow 49 the tat, but as t to assume that parting her. refers • to a straetats with a rict downtown history? ON n e � 11 Desch -W rd. 11MUO&A , carordw 9" 't Y''.� i, row l , •.i JAW HunfineE on beach Historical & icty— to see the parking structure which in later addressed in this report replace historic buildings. Parking is a concern, but its value �SH9 shoti:ld not be overemphaefxed in relationship to the value of our � historic structures. Once a bailding is removed or demolished, r unique part of our haritage is lost Forever. 1-- I mentioned that the report talks about structures with no regard to people. r,rchltocture is di eCussed but not the social issue and the L-;mct change will, have on the people: of this area. Has any one considered the psychological and/or sociological adjustment of the Home long-term residents who mus": adapt to a dramatically different y onviro,unent and lost of familiar places? Has the issue of eliYninating an area with a unique cultural leuel been discusped7 Expecting an adjustment to thin new community to be an easy endeavec is not practical rr logicai , have found no mention of the fart that st;:uctural and ectial wssuus in this area care interrelated? Fr cm a social scio*ntist point of view, structures ,enel people go land and hand. To identify the problem in WHO , the downtown area as pv:rely a atructufral, one is in this day and age � unrealistic,s To solve the downtown problem by relocatton and demolition ;,s to give no respect to our paste Instwead, we should be restoring the area, as a t.:ibute to our tra&tional community and its residents. 1 understa.i c that .the project decision will be made approximately 49 hours after the review closes and immediatdly after the public hearingi on this doc;Ument. Them appears to be no opportunity for staff to evaluate and responses to late or ,*ra.l comments on the Draft: Bit 88-4. � I- question my point in responding to this report, yet I am eurA them must be someone who does not want to see history repeat itself. ds it did in 1982. You remembers that was when a Ventura to develop a tourist attraction to be named Pacific City (modeled after Atlantic , City) failed b+ec&use of A lack cf originalitJ and forethought, Am 1 too optimistic or nak!e to bol.eve that is will not happen here again. Sincerely, Q9 STOLne Viserta-Gallnisp Reviewing Member ltnntingtoh beoch Historical Society cat folly mitt Ruth Lamh*rt Lion HeapI i Carolyn La ndlon# HBAd Barbara MLIkovich, historic Resources Hoard SW + BoWmrd, llvatiglon Inch. CahforWa 92648 1 • 4 !i • �1.�lMa1N i 14 MANK!Tt'1WAr Poutow 1 A ftWVLWMUA to 12 6 r� ! 4478 . 5309 Datoaer 11, Lose Dept. of 4100istity Dowlop•aent CLq of Mu0tington 3r40h 'Mwotington Usch, W► 02648 Re: knwironnental *attract Report dt•4 blear Ma. Main: as a famor. Joinplas Suutinpoa Usch rmsident who 'hAd 6o oprort%mity to rrork on the t'.:•-nta'm Denier, Guidelines, x an vary Latovor-tei it :ho drve?aPaonr of that ate,-.; t Ppplaudad ahan I board. it Untoria survey -71 Cbe esioting butldiniji- w.3 is progxssr. The eberactee and sucasse of a city deptads at: ito ability to cooh new and old while not hinderinS tine or d,ostrayi:tg the ather. '2i•2 It is disappointing not to see chi& bl.endin6 hap-or+ing ,'.n lluntLaztan Mach, 7 os►pectaelly In the ! Ain Stredt Area. To fus thc1 r my dixtpp-oint-Ment I now urAwrat" that th*xe is a plan to buiH a parking der-igo alonS Vgi.n 5tremt. Upon vevivotng SIR #98.4, Z have the following coa"Titx/questions : 1) Auildind design - While I can't c+ mmant an the toclinical c4pecra e a parking SAraga, I cave .:owwtkt on the aarr4hctics and f*4. sibility of the buildiog as a whole . Pedestrian azalt, which was stredwed heav;.ly to the Guidelines, seer" to have bean Lgnorod. (exhibit 5A) Mile the oquare footage numbert appear large, the spscem -!or-It cef1tet the vatying Activitior that at* aaeet.aary far tho success oa ArAn 8tromt. Vha vould rcnt t o spaces, either ratull or off Vol Aat happened to tha idea of Hall, varied retail gcorea UnIng the street? The 2 restaurant is a Mem gesture • too had it's b'idderi fro* viav and in an •ulo atd ploce t4 be s,arviood. It' s too bmall W fueicti.on sa a viaW #Ait-down vestatirant and too obscur* for a wAlk up. Ideally it would b iri ow. area whale its vitel;ty could apLIJ out into tt,o street. . .aea,yb adjacent to a plow. The pietas so drawn are little tar•a thA t half- earrexed leitov,�r space. I vonder Aat type of layeus voulcl *eke tbau Z omit *&It I 'tainted *,en I "w the slavations (exhibit 14) soasene had risad Lbe Ouidrlines, They. are not atom zo he a shopping list fe nh!eh %vory element must Uo used, thouih. The treat successful eUvations Axe the Walnut ItreeL. and Olive Street ones . tiers the Wilft,% to broken dP,.H11 into au.11or ":Iigestiblel parts h, keeping a � rimgl* voasbulacy. 'no 'shire slovittion uses a ter'wiquo which I Yi"�:,o r. '".eaaaiL.•I1Ylr,I,M.....r . r I go. Kelly Xxin page 2 Gotobsrr 17, lost Lu oohnol we Undl,y c r.11&d O*Uruh It up. '° In other wot4,s, hide V%At no m►s Mould vast to look at with troos . W wsz:e always caught , The Hain gtroat fscad. is tlunky, it In out of sca►is fox the arcs, providtn$ no ILI soosa of rhythm or er nsistenr vocabulary to ,Sivs it understanding. Thar& is too such SoLag or, za; tr 6 it sppoar f%lasy, •opecially stnce the plan is no stroight fo%wr►rdly simple . .�. 2) A,rchitectural, compatibility - On p. I1, the $TR st&tss "'the arrcchitetcuxal style of the 200 block or. the west side or K LM Street is similar tc the structure on the projeot site. " 'than on p, 34, " , . .the short-term architnotursl artyle of the proposed project will not be copatible with the adro.csnt archttsctural styles. . This is a >`.hort- verm significant impaac cn ar;chi.todcur►wl dastgn. " All thi►t use of R "short- term, Jmpiies wipitig the urea clean and starting anew. If that � Le time cost, then wary did the Ci cy raisa false hopes with a historic � survey? The proposed building is zercainly not compAtibl.e with the � area in either types -)r d-sign, _ 3) ltain street i4 an irtgortant area Lu L46 City both free a publin rrel&s.ious point of view and an economic one due to its proxf,si.ty to the ocean. *t can either be a plat* where one p*%ses through with turnnel r vl..eian or where one to drown to by the activity. it is important to i raoeorber that while the beach crowds. are seasonal , the rresident# are permanent, both groups would benefit from .such ananities as housing. M2L2 sports shone, good rettsurrants, small corvenienc a Atores, stationary 4 stores , bookscoras, a theater, and the list continuss, It' s the variacy of activitts-- that will bring the life back Lnto the aria, 4) Wile I ►redo the probl4as vith the sreA being designated "no growth, " I also feel the historie aspects can' t be ignored. Th.s FIR go*: to &zest pains to state that the project is located in a possible historic district and flat the criteria for its 4ceoptanca. Uhile not currently eligible, rehabilitation of just L= potentlally contributing buiidln&s would change that (pp-54-3g) . It seems a sham+ to ignore 2L2 that fact If there is a chance to centifitue puttir4 Oats buildings to 4 pod use. na statement an p. 64 that thata would be "significant adverse iarpe►et an the recorded history of the City of Wwtingron beach. due to the fact that a►ll onette structures would be removed struck we as srdd. Why was this sit* cbosen? What are the altereativex? S) I teas diatuy#d t9 sea the lack of effort when it came to alternativoe. nor* setisd to bo several which should be looked at it scare depose Alternative 4.4 ors •p.ld1 reach as a viable olio - Is%* impact an hi�stette butldirags and fewer poople being displaced while still being � witAin walking distance to the water and thus 1Wrax►nittig paddst>ria n ttiffie aloe& NAie Street. 'Tba b►i"vst strike stainat it sseas to bar that for the sake of 41 parkLag ape-cam historie buildings would be to damn. d warped sense of prterities, it seeas to so. Ills. 1'%11y lima tags 1 ottebet 170 lost milk "1-4 Upon goading Alternative 4, S, 1 began to reAlisa that the City has itr rind sir* up Acc to coaprooiso on any point. This time the Clark Hotel is the wild card - aavi:%g it main soul (t MOAT& less parking, Squaring N2L2 less parking spaces with less of rowenut is a big mistake . Tho amount 7 would ba sbsorbad with increase$ retail silos through a ravi tali.:ation push, not a bul,l"zor. Chuseter is an importanC irSrediant to the succe+016 of ar,; city. rids dooln't praclW* Oe"lepownt, but it ails* allows for the uniqueness of the area to exist. HuncinRtvn Beach is 1twky to hr,ve same of its histnrry still visible and It deserves to be respected. Many alt;les have barn faced with the mrse dmctsloas when aWnt old and now. On a large scalm there are Boston and Philadelphia, for example, but on a asallor, more e4milar scale thOTO are oo«wanitiea such as Laguna Beach. Bach cne preserve-a its uniqueness while � scM l.00kiag to the future with new construction providing added amenities av variety. These are the economically prosperous MW well-visited cicieQ . 1 feel that befo>ra a decision is made on this project , a more detailed study on alternate sites And prvpoS.a13 should be aide, i Bincer•ly, RM ARCHYTLOT'S/PUMERS Ann 41 . Kilkovich cc: City Council platming Comission Historic Resources Soard k; T' Y 4, °. Historic Resources Board CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC•Ff M•c„ Bost Office fox 90 Huntington Peach, California 92643 3,r October 19, 1999 Cyr. Victor Leipzig, Chairman Plamins Commission 2009 Main Street t Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: DRAFT Ell, NO. 88-4 AND STAFF RE PO P.7 OCTOBER 18, 1998 Dr. Leipzig: I have reviewed the staff report, the Draft EIR, and numerous other city planning documents during the past few days and have came to the conclusion that,ynu are nog HR82 1 ready to make an affirmative decision on this priject for the following reasons. 1. CEQA a. 115002 of TH16 14 states that the basin purpose of CEQA is to inform ' government decision makers and the public about the potential, significant envimnmental effects of proposed activities, identify ways environmental "max 2 damage can be avoided or significantly reduced, and prevent significant, avoid;.ble damage to the environment by requiring changes in projects through the use of alternatives or mitigation when the agency finds the-changes to be feasible. This implies that decision makers are charged with careful evaluation of the environmental documents and are entitled to complete reports. b. 115089 says that the lead agency shall prepare a final EIR before approving the project. Also, 415132 says that the final EIR shall include comments and re<: mmandawions received oa the Draft EIR, which, I assume includes those 32 3 expressed at this haarinis, AS WELL AS THE RESPONSE OF THE LEAD AGENCY TO THOSE COMMENTS. As much as staff would like to comply with these rrlteria, I don't see how they can and still give you time to review the final EIR In a responsible fashion this evening. IL Amhltectural Compatibility: f 106 of the Nadonal Act for Historic Prawrvation { that alterations to federal buildLigs or these which include federal participation smell be in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines. These require elk 4 rewtocsft. to histarlc design ar4 when possible, the use of authentic n--.terials. The pet offh.;e fails under thin jurisdictlo% and the State office of historic . Pneservtt>i m fas indicated that the rehab block, project does as well. Therefore, the mitigation which say* these ,structures will be modified to match the new not be ble. t an, t sta report states tint Na age�r F ukrardation omt Federal and,State assisted bowing prc:;rams to lamed by this project. TWA implies omkieratka of the sale of Fedieral (1473d) fir.i'•;:/'r! ai Moe R U-4 d. SR 10/19/19 October 19, 1988 Page 2 of 2 Ak money for retoc:srtion. if any Federal money is included in the project, tither for construction or relocation of dtsp'lacees, the guidelinca of 1106 apply to this MRD2 R { project. It is imperative that a full clarification be made 3f :his issue.. tit. Findinp for Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 88-34. 3. Contrary to the staff report, this project plan is not consistent with the �.-b oral Plan. This plan states one of the goals of the Open Space and conservation Element Is "preserving art'. protecting areau of significant, historic, scenic and vchaaological value (52.1.2.5.1). Under RE-SOURCE CONSERVATION PRIORITY AREA-q 1,1. lists as a first priortvp area "protect valuable sites from Rda A thoughtless or u mecessary destruction; identify, analyze, and preserve valuable sites (Figure 2-2). The EIR states clearly as does the staff report that the Clark Hotel ;s significant, and that the project is within a potential National register District. it wets obviously the will of the community and council as recently as June of 1984 to protect and preserve areas such as this. For this reason, a survey was completed and a resource board established. It simply doesn't make sense for the staff report to ignore this criteria of the General Plan. -- Communities nationwide are suddenly recognizing the value of their historic sections and ve beginning to restore them. 1 urge you to request that staff fully develc►p .all possible HR82 7 alternatives to obliteration of this cultural resource and that ,you take time to read cwent literature and contrast the potential of our old downtown with others. I thine you will be surprise, and glad you delayed action. Sincerely, ra 1Vltiikovich. Chairman Histarlc Resources Board 11M:gbM xc: Plan ft Commission city council Mike Adams Kelly Main Ruth Lambert 1; : � (14734 :Mt�YL'_ itF..r+yy: v, _ •'!'••:4:t lk.".i41Y.k.s Ya' _ _ _ __— .. _.i,Yriew. a��,i• wry r' 715 1LL 1IV i ur �v r WV ♦ do ' vv. 1 A. 9032 Dundee Drive � Huntington Beach, CA 921-547 OI:TOBIR 14 , 1988 Dr. Victor Leipzig , Chairman Planning Coenmi a s ion City of Huntxngzon Uach 2000 Rain St. Huntington Teach, CA 9:546 Dear Dr. Leipzig: I find tsyseylf in a unique position, Today in OcteAer-14A. 1958 , two clays before the clone of the public responsojpTrod• to the Draft $1R 88-40 2AA Block parking structure. Yetl in addition to Draft MIR 88-4 1 have in front of me the staff rljprt on the pro4oct which recommends aertifiadtion of the E R fart of the attf f rocosemended action is a resolution No. 1408 thic'sh states am•1 that "all persons and agencies wishing to respond to notice duly given have been heard by the Plan- ning Commission either through written notice or during as public hearing 'on October 18, 1988, and such responses and cats as Were made wore duly noted and resp►ozEded to . " It is unlikely that staff can respond to gay written comments . nor` those of others ,aubmittead late in the review period, nor to those pre;seanted during the public hearing on Ootaber 18 1988 in time for 8M 2 the planning Commission to take responsible Action on that fame dmta. I thought the purpose of the public review and the re- sponse period was to compii.e a final EIR for the decision making body to study AND THEN TAKE ACTION. Section 18089 (a) of the Guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act states that a. final EIR must be prepared before ap- proving t4.% prc ject and in Section 15089 (b) that lead agencies may. providese an opportunity for review of the final SIR by the pub- Sm .t lie or by commenting agencies before approving the prosect . The contents of this EIR are, specified in Section 16132 of the sauce j d9aument aad include in part (b) comments and recommendations re- ceived on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary and (c) a list of persons, ergaaniaaations and public agencies commenting on � the Draft SIR. It seems quite clear that these requirments can- i net physically be acoompli.shed within the proposed time frame' It thowetore. recoasmsnd that the Planning Conaltsion request a � "atinuas►as of this item u nt i 1 all the aosuoutas reritten and oral at to ftbbio Marlago can be addressod, a►dditlano), IntomaSlan be ON g imIudW luA a►neat1wr public review be caap'let*4 of the Final ZIR. no. Want sj this projeaet is far 140 fit* % to praceed othsavise. �J0 ,F ,14 I G4. IVl1 u6l 1 � Nt1 1�. • dJ I .v✓ I have previewed the BIR 0-4 and agrser with the conclusl ono of thq am a consultant that t.Bare is no mitigation which will sufficiently lower the impact of this project on the hintorio areas of the city , I believe , however. that It is critical to understand that the state aaaxt,horlty considers this to be a National Regi3ter- eliglhle historic district nowo without alterations to the present 9MA 6 structures . This information makes it eve a more important to se- riously consider one oL, a combination of they aaI-Lorneativea projects listed in the SIR. Table H notes the bui ld.i,nga on the ZmA block which require seismic" upgrades. I have been told by the cha►iman of the Historic Build- lag Code Commission, Wayne Donaldson , that they quall,fy for evaluation and repair ander that mordratory code which sulporsedes local seismic cosies . The EIR does not indicate that this new re- view has been made, While public safety is still the goal of the am 7 historic code provisions , they differ in deKree from modern codas . The use of historic code provisions in 'this area may afloat the economics of restoration to make it more feasible to retains the buildings . This option netade to be addressed. Because this is within sn historic area, flanked by the partially federally funded rehab block and the federal post office, the reo- emmendaations to reduce architectural incompatibility are not fea- sible. Any altera►tioa to these aadj acont projects , I unders%&nd, is oQbject to Section 106 review by the Office of Historic proservatiun, and ultimately, the Faercretary of the Interior. I am A sexicusly doubt that these agencies would be amenable to changing •%he original character of iui•thaer project. Therefore, they proposed ptar;i4ng structure will not be compatible with the surrounding structures unless it is redesigned to compliment them. Table I shows the magnitude of the cumulative impact of the pres- ently proposes* projects on the historic area . In the apse* of Just a few years, almost all the hiatorie commercial structures of the community will, be demolished. Th4 s will complete'ly destroy the traditional character of the City of Huntington Beach. In ad- ■M p dition to these anticipated impacts, I have just learned that the proposed Heritage Square has been deleted from the general project area. This possible loan makes the redesign of the present project almost imperative nine* they relocation possibilities have diminished for its structures . A 000nawie teraasibility etudy far Alternative 4 .6, design sltern&- tivo should be prepared and carefully analyzed. The *aly reran draw 'bacb tq this alternative it that it impacts Phase t . It the purpcse of the paarktng structure is truly to provide parking for � ,�� this projects than it should bear same of the burden of its visual blight. Careful derma of this alternative shotild •parer some of the few rmaaining oossauni,ty historic structures sad still provider porlting for a distinctly different saoderu structure. 4 N 1 ILL 1\b . Vlb � J. /•fVv' Zr �,. i ZZ 1 1 Iry 41 1 It tho Commission must act on the pro,lect without Ibxther conoid- *ratio n, z 4ould u rga it to deny the project ontitlamants, and ►.Iso rv4oct the declaration of overriding necessity to proceed em 11 with the project as daai,gned. There is an obvious no•d lc,: ad- eitional parking conventent, to the coast, but sensitive planning should be able to find ar compromise location which will net do- stroy the uniqut charactor of our historio oitr, w a bX& Mi 1 kov ich � cc : Planning Commission, City Council , , ally Main, Ruth Lambert , Doug La Salle , Mike Adafio , ao►► Napo).i. 1pw a � M1 I+�I lih�j4 11 A I z y Summary of 6taatowernt EIR 86--4 : 1 . Rosolut,ion M 1,406 is premature . It is physi.c40.1y improbable that a Final 11H can be prepared in accordanoe with CEQA require- gM 1p mersts on the evening of tho public hearing for tho draft document 1n time for the Conxissir,,a to act rerAsonaxbly on IV, Nblic revie should be allowed of the Final SIR prior" to decision. 2 . There is no mitigation kh ch w1 1' lessee►, the► impact of this �am 1R project or the cit,y ' s histors.o resources. 3 . Thi,% protect is within at Natio.n&l Register-eligible Historic � am 14 District and repr03011t$ the bulk of its structures. 4 . Use of they Historic Building Code is mandatory for buildings am 1s within a historic area and supersedes local seismic codes . +. Architectural compatibi 11 tv may not be achieved by altering sM 1s aad j&oent historic struotartes , The majority of theaeee area subject to Federal mlziff&tion of design and/or demolition. 6 . The cumulative, impact of this and proposed projeatas will vir- tually M �7 eliminate tba ci,ty' s historic resources. Hewitage Square is no longer a planning option to retain important displaced h,is- toric structures . ^t T. Axe a aonc,Aic feasibility study ahould ba prepared for Alt4rna - lam 1s tive 4 . 6, dosign alternative . This appears to be a solution. i 8. At this timse the project entitlements should be denied. IBM 19 i 9 . There are insufficient grounds for a statement of overriding necessity since the result of tho projsat is to hasten the lose of oM 20 i the entire heritage of Huntingto;i Beach, J Barbara 11i1kovieh OCTJ W? 1 " I Y SECTION 3 : USPONSES TO COMMMS The following section responds to all comments related to ehe Draft Envi- yrAsWeptal IMpaat RrpoVt, Several comments do no,: addLejs they completenesa or &&q-"cy of the RIR or raise significant environnantal it,bues • A oub- stantive response to such comments to not mppropri,ata within, the ecintext of the California Environmental Quality Act. Such: comments are rear tided to wlch a *cnmaent ackatowledged" referencu. 11iis indicates that the comment will be forwarded to all appropriate decisionmakers for their review and ounr ldwra►tion. . f I a i I 1' it Oft 1 went The State Clearinghouse has submitted t•hs above named drwft Environmental Isspset Report (LIR) to selected state agencies for review. Tho review period is now closed and the comments from t'ho responding agancy(ies) is(sre) syncloseyd. On the enclosed Notice of Complocion ;form you will note that the Clearinghouse has chocked the agencies that have commented. Please review the Notice of Completion to censure that your comment package is cowplate. If the comment packagu as not in order, please notify the ' State Clearinghouse immediately. Remember to refer to the pro.ject' s eight- digit Stage Clearinghouse number so that .e may respond promptly . OPR 1 Response The comment ip noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisioTumakers. OM 2 Comment Please note that Section 211104 of the California Public Resources Code requires tbat: *A responsible agenr:y or other puolic agency shall only makA substan- tive to ents regarding those activities involv6d in a project which are Within aft area of expertise of the agency or which are reiq-:fired to be carried out or approved by the agency ." Comenting; ardenciss are also squire by the= section to support their com- ments with specific documentation. OP'R 2 Response The comment is noted and included In the final record of the project for review and consideration by approp►riata decisionnakera, ape ! Co"Mut 'these a:va cents are forwarded C-3r your, uRa in prjj ,aring your final Ell. Should you need more infgraation or clarifcation, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency(ies) , OPR 2 lrspMes a comtdmut to Noted and included in the final record of the project for rwvisa mW aonolderation by appropriate Cacisiarmakers. d 0!''R 4 Convent i t lids latter aaknowleiges that you, have complied ---tith the state Clearing- heuse review requirements for draft environmer;tal documents, pursuant to J the C&Worni;t Enviro=ental quality Act. Pleas* contact Keith bee at E 916;445-0b1W if you hAve qu�estiana regarding the environmental review pt:c- + r.�ess. a OTR 4 Raspense The comteent Is noted and included in the final record of the project for review and consideration by appropriate decisio:vaakers . AltTMM OF P&M ANY RECREATION (DPR) PPR 1 Cosmout lh* draft EM refonence► above dns.s not adequately analyze tha importance of ad signifi,catit effects on historic resources in downtown Huntington Beach. j DPR l Re sposr sa The oo=ent is noted &nd included in the final record of the project for tavieei and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers . Ths impacts of the proposed project on historic resources is dtacussod on pagans 53 to 71 of the Draft SIR. On page 71 of the Draft EIR, it was concluded that the pro- Jeet would bays unavoidable adverse impacts on the recorded history of the City of SunVington death, the proposed historic district:, and eanaite ro.atross. Cumulatively, the project would contribute to significant adverse UVacts on the recorded history of tho City, the proposed historic district, acid historic resources in the community, DfR ! CQoMMdt Ise partlaular, the draft SIR relies too hoavily on the hiscorlc resources butvoy report preparod for the City by Thirtieth Street Architects In 1987 F &Ad i pres tw follow.-up study done by our staff in May 1988, a copy of which is attoched. As a resource, the draft RJR underestimates the saver. ity of tbs sig.ificant ,,ffects that the project mould have on historic resources. 9 R Y Response 9lhar orr .!on cortsimad in the May 13,' 1908 letter from ,dmb g.ate of Cal- r;'''' it'beg",OffLee of Historic Preservation rr is not iiaeluded in the Sistc"rizal a, r 478ist Section 3.4 of the Draft SIR. Inclusion of the inforw WttL4Qi, +prastraiMd in this letter would not change the conalusions of the DgAft Mo idaatify new impacts; identity increased severity of discussed I""., 0;,,,$meow 4110910rtives that mete not Sao sidezado or provido nitiga- not o.onuitdexoi.. The Draft 911 on pap 71 clearly states h 'I 7 ''• e�lVi 1f 1�•F Pr, .IRf {'li ` n1pl �i.`11 I . _ -- __ _ -_ — 11 :� 1 ` Alppr 1•?yr � 4" r.r 11 i I ' I i "The proposed protect will havo a saigntfivant ofEec:t' on tho recorded history of the City of. Huno':ington beach, the City proposed Main Street Historic District, and onnito historic reaoureo3 . This impart can be •tessapned by the+ proposed mitigation, but not eliminated, and should be considered an unavoidable adverse project impact. C.uaula clva;ly, thlaa pro,jact , is conJ%,%nct.-�on with other past, present , and reasonably foreaaeftabte future prolects, will have a sigstificant effect on the recorded history of ttpe City of Huntington Beach, the City proposed Haan Street Historic District , and 'historic resources . within the Community generally." The Draft SIR idantifies thacr the project will have significant unavoidable adverse impacts can the history of tho City of Huntington Beach, on the pro.- posed National Register of Historic Places district, and onsite resources. CUMU14tiv417, the, project will unavoidably impact the history of the City of Huntingta4► Beach, the proposed districu, and offaite historic resources. The Draft BIR idenr.ifies that with the implementation of mitigation mea- sured, structural impacts to offsite historic resources are the only Impacts that can be mitigated to a lovel of insignificance . Ths Draft EIR 88-4 did not include the May 13, 1938 letter from the State of California Offiea of Histar Proservatton on its list of references . Section 7. 3, page 117 of the Draft SIN is Amended to includes, the folloving reference Donald S. Napoli, May 1988, firer to dr.. &chael C, Adams, DPR 3 Coment We caucluded that the site of the proposed project is within a historic district that appears eligible for listing in the National Register of His- toric Places. The draft SIR should have diucussed the significant , !16cts of the project on this district. The project could endanger the continued existence of the district by elisminaLing an important part of it. Thg draft ZIR ashould have evaluated the Affect of the project on the National. Regis- ter eligibility of the district. Dfk 3 Response The Draft SIR atatess on page 66 that: "the arability to obtain historic district status would occur due to the less of historic buildings and the dinsinished integrity of the F downtown area. The characteristics of location. setting, feeling, and r asswsociatioe rauld be eliminated. This is considered a significant adverse impact.$ lba 0iffioe of Historic Preservation has id6ntified a downtown National ►'eater District --hat 'fappealrs eligible for listing. . ." The Office of Usterle Proservation h&4 aomurred with rhu significance of buLldings 8 " %r, f r 1 0 , N. _• ,' ��I�,V"';rya�, '+�', LL{aM, t•a5' y MUM- syithin the project 'boundaries . Are indicates. in the rasponse to comment DFR 2 , the Draft EIR ideuti.fics that project-specific and cumulative impacts of aria projeor will have unzvoid4ble significant adverse impacts can the pro- p set downtvwri National Rfigister historic district, Dft 4 Comment The draft iYR discussee stimulative effocts that this and other projects 1d havw an the downntovn. This discussion points up the al -irtcomings of a6lressing t,bose effects :ln a max ias of single-project HIRs . The long-term cumulative effects of those projects could be adequately ide*ctifieu artd analyzed if the, City props+red a cowprahon!,Ive EIR fur all f its downtown projects. This is especially true becauas the significant affect on the district as a whole 1:3 likely to be more dramatic than the effect on its individual components . DPI 4 Responzo Table H, pages 69-70 of Section 3.4 "Historic resources" identifiers the address, ar'chitsctur:i 1. style, date of construction, noted Structural alter- ations, and ranking of historic structures located within redevelopment project sites shish have '5ean proposed oi: dpproved in the downtcwn Hunting- ton Reach aron. The Draft EIR states on page 68: "With the exception of the Rehabilitation Block and Heritage Square, all existing onsite historic buildings will be demolished to permit rode velopment. Tite proposed project will incremenLally contribute to the redaction of historic structures in the City of Huntington Beach. This reduction is considered a significant adverse impact. " The preparation of an EIR for all of its downtOWL projects as requested by the co went DM 4 would be inappropriate. CF.QA requires that an EIR be (prepared for a "project." It further requires that tits EIR address pro- jrct-specific: and cumulative impacts, The Draft EIR does this and con- el%WWM that, "The proposed project will have a significant effect on the recorded history of the City of Huntington Beach, the City proposed Main Street Historic District, and oiwi.te historic resources. This impact can be lessened by the proposed mitigation, but not elimListed, and should be consWered at vetavoidable a&eroe project impact. C%mlatirvely, this project, in conjunction with other past, present, and raaso'nably foreseeable future projects , will have a *igttifLeant effeer, en the recorded history of the City of RmAtiuStorr Beach, the Ashy pro sod Main atrest Historic District, and historic resources within the GOAMMIty gonetally." j s� Sf , ti' . .... µ pl ti M" r { " .J, *ti. R' I Y The comprehensive avaluat.ion of hLit-oric resources wa r► cumplctad by the elty of Huntin-ton Beach and re%.riew-md by tee State office of W storic Pras- st-,cation. Project impacts on hi,at :rric resources, both gpecifi:, and c.umula- tiv.:, have been evalusteO based on this study. r This is no "projec•-" as defined by the State (,EQA CAJdalinex upon which thc- City can at this tie• .:■qui.rs. a "Focused FTR" ot, hi'st o►•ic resouresa for the overall downtaw. area. Appropriately, the, Cicy of. Huntington Beach required prepar&tton on ,an EXR to address "cumulative" impacts of this and F other past, prs►aGnt, and ieaaonably foraseeabla future project:- an historic r rseources . i DPR 5 Cntawent i; Tho draft E•IR should be rewritten to J.vir-Rude a discussion of our findings . a i then r'e-clroulated for t:eviow, This revised draft would proviee, fur- ther In£onmtion that the City could use to consider a range of, 6evelopment alteniatives, ,some of which would reduces anticipated significant effects on historic properties to an iroignificant levi�l and thug preaPc-ve these prop- r ert:iea for future use rind e.•al oyment, DPI 5 Response The City of Huntington Beach dues not believe that the Departmant of Parks and Recreation has identified any environmental issues associated with the Proposed project requiring additional discussion. No issues have been raised that have ident:itied significant environmental issues not presented in th�, Draft EZR whicb was available for pu►Alc review. The comments of i the Departoent have been adequately addresser{ in these Respnatst to Comments which are incorperat 6d into the Final EIR for the proposed project. Ths Draft ELK identif+ws used evaluates fivj alternatives to the prop000d project. The following alternatives were evaluated and their ability to reduce or eliminate: any significant adverse environmental effect, is the 4"W deterarinant on Whether an alcarna.tive should remsir, under consider- ation. Ramratn Under AlternatJXW No Project Np so Develemetnt Y4r. Altemative lacation Yes ftwaervation of Clark Hotel Yes Design AlCl MAtive N�+ =woo of the *,mluatwd. Rlternativee ara con atursd to be envilronsetitally sdetrier to the rraposed project. These al,.er►cati-res should reswin under dMotdoration during project review. 061•' 10 h, • r, 'Y r 1T V Y 11'.Yi r , . x to=saat it Noted and inclu&4 in the final record of the pro j oc t,• or 9010W and cousidoration by appropriate decis i anz&ker3. ,.Yr. V: a CO nt staff analysir was a matter of public racard long taforK, the initial h `;•' #440 of thi,a projtct. Our findings were presented to the Cf ty planning drftotte by let;tmr in May and to tho City Council (Acting as the board of 1** 'tedbvelopment agency) at a public woeting in Jur:e . Their have been me-a- ot000d in other cerrespondencs ai.nco and were the rub,ject of an article in do Local nowupoper. The fail-Are of the draft BIR to incluue our findings , 4c"dy ■o well known in Huntington Beach, neana that the City cannot rely on the draft BIR tap make informed and coixincing deci: ions. °• BtR E itesp�nse Please refer to the raspo.tse to comment DPR 1 . No information is provided � In We letter which alters the enviroraAantal conclusions of the Draft EXEC regarding historic resources which stat:ex that tlha project will h.--vs xig- oi.ficant unavoidable adyezae impact S an unsitee and vFfait:e historic resouicea , proposed districts, and the history uf: the City of Nuntingt:on Reach, CITY OF HUNTIECTON BEACH 41STORIC MOURCES BOARD (HRB) IMS 1 'r,"PPe-Stt The Historic Resoty:ces Board accepts the basic conclusl,)n of E R 88.4 whi.c:h states t.har, the ,signific.ajit effect of the city' s hi.storic vesources earnot be mitigated. Its members believe , however, that: some additional informa- tion would be appropriate for full unde>:standing And evaluation ref the documnt. Therefore we offer the follovinS coiw.ents No 1 loop=$* The draft: ETR doer indicate that, pot-ential at rii�:L~ral impacts `c offsite j i"act:s can be mi.t..gaged to a level of inrigni.ficAnce ,with the implementa- tion of !litigation Measure 4, page 71. The cotaeeat is noted and included in the final racoi d of the project .for rrtviev and consideration by appropriate decisionmakers. RD Z Carnrenti QIBTOLIC EVALUATION IU Callfemla Office of Historic Pyressivuti.on believes the area which �,. ircluden this project to be a Nrttional Register-eligible historic district (See los*6 copy of simp and letter) . This informatioa was not Included La the SIR, leaving the Lopresalon that riia 19P ; ,,urvey Document was the 11 a ,Tip o P .. . 14 S � qqo t ' daly available information. Since there is an obvious difference of opin- ion between the two, we think that the Planning Coaeaission must rousider both possibilities. The Comi.ssiortars should be aware that the area is v believed to bit aignificent by the authority which will make the final 4 determination of National Register ellgib.'Aity. WB 2 Reap"$* E The Draft tail oonC:ur:z with the California Office of Historic► Presorvation and the Cit3 of. Huntington beach Historic Reisources board that tho project site +end ,project area are Important historic resources . For that reason, the Draft EIR indicates that. the Lass of onai to historic structures would adversely effect the o 13:bility of the aces as a Watitional Register his- toric diNtrict. Please refer to the reupons.ts to commer_ts DPR 2 and 3. 6 ki 1 3 cowment ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITYWITH SU"0UNDIDl%U ARF,A f The projcct;, as designed, 1.% not architecturally compatible with the adja- cent krea. Tho sug�iestion that the historically accurata piss for the 'rehab block* be redesigned to match the p_•oposod p;ru,jeci: further d+emages tra hi.rcoria fabric of the district, ns does the sugges ton that otter i nearby historically significant buildir19 be remodeled. lhass recommend. ttions are claall:ly unacceptable and thould be elLminat6d as having an ovart greeter impact on the historic resource represented by the com►narciaal core than that of the project. • Ht� I II e s s s The City of il4ntingt:.on Be %ch Downtown Design Guidelines implements the doel.s of the adopted Downtown Spectf{c plat:. The Design Guidelines pro- notoft oontemporary Heidi nerranean archite,;Lfire in the downtown area, It is dw intrtat Of the City of 14untirtgton 3each to change the existing archit~ee- twal charactoristica of t',e 200 block on the west side of lain Suteae,: Rah"Llit;attiion 41'%ck, This change will include the incor-poration at build. y inS Ustorirls, colo.,.r, entryways, and window treatments siaLlar to the ,pro. paved pre,ject, Am teotad it+ thw response to c')mzent: DPR 2, the Draft Elk identifies that this project iu conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably Pore; g rrei41a future proje►c;a V111 have significant advarie impacts on historic resoutess is the City of H"itington Beach. ' count Is noted and included in the final retard of the project far fro*t w and amre►si.detrattirna by approprlaste deeisiansakore. 12 —Gomm I Opp— Punish 10/26/88 KPPZ.L W PLANNIM� Cut' ISSION 8 APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL TISE pSMT MD. 88-34/C(JASTAL 1pEYlIT,OMENT PERMIT NO. 08-270' sirmoI+MSfnA.L IMPACT ASPOAT NO. 9 8-4/fiESTATIVE FARCEL MAP $8-3 8 5 (2equesr is to develop a 5- Level Parking dtructure with 32 , 073 Square Peet of Cor%rsarcial) �'�,';►r XOTICE 16i N SY GIVEN that the Huntingtor Boaeh City Council will hcxtl S phublic hosting in the Council Chamber at the Hunti.nq�or peach CI,Vic Centeir# 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California] on the date and at thie time indicated below to receive and Consider the stattc of ail persons who wish to be heard relative to the application 48scribed below. _ !Monday, November 7, 1988, 7 : 00 PM ' YA: Appeal to Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 88-34 , Coen-sl Development Permit No . 88-27, Environmental Impact Report No . 80-4 , and Tentative Parcel flap No . S8-385 AmrQW; City of Huntington batch Redevelopment Agency Councilwoman Ruth Finley gy: Goutheast ug %taln Street - 200 Black (bounded by Main Bt feet , Walnut Avenue, Third Street and Olive Avenue) ,, II $: Downtnem Specific Flan District S5 (Mined Use �- Comaercial/of Tice/tiesidentia l) EB=: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s approval of an a psoximately 817 space, 5-level parking stvuatu:re w1th 32, 073 square feet of c:omercial, and a request to consolidate 28 lots into one lot and vacate an alley. Covered by Env i ronmenta 1 lwgact Report go . _ 88-4 also, boing appeal-ad and which will also be cons ide:recl by the City Council . : The subject area la Within a non-appeplable area of the coaatai zone. _ VIP 0A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Departarsnt of Community Developeient , 2000 Main Street, � Neatington Beach, California 92848, for inspection by tick public. ALA 1 PURSOM ore invited to at;:ond said hearing and iXp S OP11616As or alit oridenne for or against the application aN eMWOW 00ve. If there are a-ir further quextions plesse cart LbUtS MIUVO, A8818tent Planaer st 836-5 l71. CITY OF B wrACTON NNACti Dated: 10/2?1$6 Conn- to Brockway,. City Clock