Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Use Permit 85-77 - Paul Thompson - SW corner of Autht' tued to `uQlttM Il ,► �?�,,,_��..� Y. CO UN C I _ 0 etttsomwis of all kinds,nt Win noticat by Mcrae of the Suparwr Cowl of Orange C put�tst CI7ounty, ApktRVvry c, CaHtotnia. NUmUer A•621s, dated 29 SgOptemb0r, 1951, and 19(Z A•241331, dated 11 June. 19S3, 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA . I*y��� County of Orange Pvwc Jilt I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid, I am over the age of ei hteen tots t+h /"I 9 9 owrt a 1., years, and not a party to or intersected in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of they Orange `'i o it ?i `et4liy Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the any.�rt'ta~a t+�dr<C+h Go�l+aif yA� � NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, a `c�rwrtrft.rt eM f . printed an,1 published in the City of Costa Mesa, 1 County of Orange, State of California, and that a = re 'h Notice of PUBLIC HEARING as h mire OiM,WA tiriMer� tilts :•c Qttas. �„M1pteM`i, of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete *. .! $M 7 f.A t>t 0 Nf copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa. " 1 A! OR;Milg-1 0. Newport Beach. Huntington Beach. Fountain Valley, Irvine. the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for 1 t i.1n a tlMtirMc:. �►nd�"e't. to wit the Issue(s) of �p►i 'm1 t 98 � '1'A'Ttralit'stipsPcsMilM+s+•' , r >a: +eawwij , tto ■At:.twtr ---- 198 �11�orr'���t► .t�M�tt�. t9S fIQl101r� �iRllad 198 M �atue+�s �'i�'i tMtae�•�w ;�'n+R•+r�.�� �IAM'• ao. af# l declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. 4: +krh+r- Its, February 24 6 Executed on 1196 at'Cos Mesa, California. 1441) Signature '�`•'�+.(!1� _�—�':; a�Tt'�.-�v.w•�•� �. �.. .Ci•�♦a,`�. '�/ef'dtP'Z:il�....�ru _ � � � — • � . . 1 '�' 1`�J � 1�t~ _s t. • � • 1 . ,, .. , 1 � L.! l. •../. t _ 1..1.—•..,sJ• ��+.._• L �,, ... "' .r fA IL ....w....�.� ��P',� ' r �f ly M JV F-O • y ► UT; 1 f . .�� t •UL p ' ! .>.,.. :'NORTH El -EVATION FLAM P4TVP IwZsSfw ?1p6Dmm*eNDeP .. .� acL -* q r�S ;^. "-"_'�!!'s�,�. .....: v.ixi�.� �._._A .IY7=«`..r .. .1..=:.10�LWJv.. �.r......._..___ _. - ...•r■Mnr.:.�l II .. ',4C-3 APPEAL OF BOARD QF'.r 'ON7NG ADJUSTMENT'S DENIAL 0 USE PERMIT NO. 85-77/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85--78 Aalicant : Robert Mandic/Paul Thompson Use Permit No . 85-77 is a request to build a­two--story, 2 , 730' square ' foot office building on a 5 ,305 Square foot lot with 50 feet of street front&ge which is less than the required minimum size . (6 , 000 square feet ) and frontage (60 feet ) . --londitional 1::.cception No. � 85-78 is a requecit to permit: ( A) Eight parking spaces, in lieu . of ten 19 .1 required, rounded up) , (B ) one compact size parking space (none are permitted for a building this size ) , (C) use of the alley ^r parking space turning area , (D) a 0 ' side yard 5aild'.n�i setback . 11',ong the south property line in lieu of 10 feet, ( E ) less than a 10 .00t wide landscaped planter in various locations along "B" Street and Ito rner. . Or: November 27 , 1985 , the Board of Zoning Adjurtments denied the request because a buildingg of 2 ,100 square feet r.:,uld be established on the property with sufficient parking area and 'confo-.-ming setbacks, as conceptually presented to the Planning CommiSsion ,in conjunction with Zone Change No. 85-14 ; and because lack of adequate on--site parking and maneuverability would result in vehicles backing out on `V Street and incrr,.,• ed parking on "B ° Street . Subsequently, the applicant a,-pealed the decision. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is exempt under Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED ; Paul Hanpton, applicant , spoke in support of the proposal explainiog that his business was a photography studio where half of his business is by appointment off premises , further stating rhat ' his business does not create that much traffic . He added that he disagreed with condition ild reaue5ting that a landscape berm nay be used instead of a wall , Commissioner Erskine expressed con -,ern about the architecture of the building feeling that :sere should be more consistency with the materials in the proposal and the adjacent neighborhood structures . Wayne Penny, Architeit , stated that the reason for the wood matcrial was 'because the proposal is the last commercial project on this street and the other side is residential reasoning , that the applicant was trying to reserve some of the residential style . Thee being' no further testimony, the public hearing w.as closed . commissioner Schumacher questioned if it was . possible for the applicant to request :a berm instead of a wall . Florence :Iebb of staff stated that either one would be acceptable. P.C. December 17 , 1985 ` — — ---- 11 It" I r' i Commissioner Erskine referred the Commission to conditions W and #18 stating that he would like the roof materials be of a more permanent material such as the and the north and south race of the building be of brick or .stucco. He also asked staff if the Commission could make this conditional use permit apply to only this particular applicant and not tun with the land . oin Poe of staff stated that he recommends a condition of approval to work with the fire department and the building department on alternatives for the outside stairs . A MOTION WAS MALT BY ERSKINE AND SECOND BY MIRJAHANGIR TO APPROVE THE .APPEAL OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS DENIAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 85--77/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 140. 85-78 WITH MODIFIED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS BI THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood, Erskine , Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: Porter out of the room ABSTAIN: None M07rON PASSED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - USE PERMIT NO . 85--77 : 1 . The establishment , maintenance and operation of the photographer office/studio will not be detrimental for a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b . Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building . 2 . The granting of the use permit and conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL, - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-78 : 1 . because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, regarding size and shape , and corner location , the strict application of the Zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other '- properties In the vicinity and under identical zone classifications 2 . Because of the street corner dedication required, the granting . . of a conditional exception is necessary In order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights , f t � P .C. December 17,, 1985 -8- x, } 3. The granting of Conditional Exception No. 85-78 will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same zone classifications . 4 . The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 . A revised site plan shall be submitted depicting fhe modifications described herein: a . Reduce the building size to no greater than 21400 gross square feet . b . Relocate compact parking space at west end of building. ce Rearr&nge parking stalls as shown on attached plan . d . Provide 32-inch decorative screening wall or berm to code . e . Trash area f. Wheel stops 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant shall j submit the following plans: a . Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Development Servicea and Public Works for review and approval . b . Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan . Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment . 3 . Landscaping shall comply with S. 979 . 5 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . 4 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the ordinance Code, Building Division , and !Fire Department. .5 . Maximum separation between building wall and property line shall not exceed two inches ( 20 ) . b . Driveway approach an IB' Street shall be a minimum 'of :twenty feet ( 20 ' ) in width and shall be of radius type construction . E 7 . 'The corner ROW radius shall be 34 feet . Street , to ultimatrt ROW,8. Dedicate 5 feet or. S S . . , . . :. and 2-1/2 feet for the alley � on Warner �►v per Public Works Standards , i. Pf-ce recember 17 f. 1985 :.:9.. `3 i �,k�,� l., � a f �. '. � .' y .'� '. 1 •��;� ' � ' �� S �, .....,.........,.. •'.im � ., �� .,_ � _,.... ,. A l; `� �. �. ' .� � i � f ii ``. ` � � 1 � � �f \` � �� I. '•' �� ',�.+r� 1 '4 �+ _�� ' t� } �t ''f a . f. i.. �. � � . � i � t.� ,,, _ .. � . ,.. , v �' - � - � �. .' �. • � '• � .. ,� . � � r� •, f .. � 'a .., � � 9 . All signs shall comply with Articles 976 of the. Huntington Beach ordinance Code . All free--standing signs shall be low-profile, monument-type signs . 10 . Improve Warner , 'B' Street and alley to ultimate ROW per Public Works Standards . 11 . All employees shall park in the rear parking a-ea . 12 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters , and central heating units . 13 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets -. � 13 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumrer , wire , pipe , and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at An offsitefacility equipped to handle them. 15 . If lighting is included in the parking lot , high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings . All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent °spillage ' onto ,i adjacent properties . 15 . The subject property shall enter into irrevocable reciprocal ' driveway and parking easement ( s ) between the subject site and adjacent southerly property . 17. Roof materials shall be of non--combustible tile . 18 . The south facing wall shall be maintenance free and non-combustible and compatible with new development in the area . 19 . All customers shall be by appointment only. 20 . Revised elevations shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and approval . Special attention shall be paid to providing esthetically pleasing long lasting building materials and assuring compatibility w_th the surrounding area . 21 . The number of stairs shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and Building Division. C-- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85--58/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 7/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 55-31 A2pli t,: Dana Blanchard The proposed project -fists of construction of a three-story 29-unit mini-suite motel w�1`C3rw►majlagerls quarters . The conditional exception requests one parking spa �&%ft.L4 suite in' lieu of two as required by S . 9791 . 12 . 1fg ) , reduction parking spaces :to i 32 ,,' and an excess of 25% of the uiiits to contain chen , in ' lit,u of S 9700 13(e ) . The, zoning is Visitor Serving Commer (Article 949 ) which lists hotels and motels as permitted 'uses sub o approve p and pursuant .. to'`the stand a royal of conditional use permit _ar su�ti,, `uses contained in the C4 D:lstri,ct ( At ticl'e 947 f P.C. AeCernber 11 , 1985 �-10� rs AWAL 20M MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA EQ648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK i March 6, 1996 Paul Thompson 5012 Tasman Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held March 3. 19©G denied your appeal to Condition No. 20 of Use Pelt No. 85-77 and concurred with the staff recommendation to approve the revised elevation plan of Use Permit No. 85-77 dated January 23, 1986 with additional woodsiding on the building to accent the windows and doors as shown in Attachment psi of the staff report dated March 3, 1986. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant .to Pro- visions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure or 'the' State of Califorr+ia you have ninety days from March 6, 19B6 to apply to the courts for 3udlcial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office - 536-5227. Alicia "I. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:,js Enclorure CC: City Attorney Development Services Director �.. r _..w•.e..rW•.ter.Y• J1 . r•. •a.a.w r..� r_..._....a.... __. _. ,. � __ REQUE&( FOR CITY OOUNC ACTION Data Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council �- Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION' S CONDITION N0. 2 OF USE PERMIT NO. 85-77 Consistent with Council Policy? ' "os [ j New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Action., Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration ib an appeal filed by the applicant Paul Thompson to the Planning Commission 's act..an to clarify Condition No . 20 of Use Permit No . 85-77 by requiring more swucco on the proposed photography building located on the south side of Warner and "B" Street . I RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning Commission action on January 22 , 1986 and recommendation : MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSKINE, SECOND BY PORTER TO APPROVE AND CLARIFY THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 20 OF USE PERMIT NO. 85-77 AND REQUIRE MORE STUCCO IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN CONTINUITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTIES BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Schumacher , Livengood , Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: Winchell ABSENT: Hone ABSTAIN: None The Planning staff recommendation is to approve the revised elevation Flan dated January 23, 1986 , with additional wood siding on the building to accent the windows and doors . ANALYSIS: Applicant/Appellant: Paul Thompson 5072 Tasman Drive Huntington Beach , CA 92649 Request: An appeal to Planning Commission Condition No. 20 ofUse ` Permit 85-77 requir ng additional stucco on t:he elevations of the proposed photography building . s I, Location : 8092 Warner Avenue {southwest corner of .Warner avenue s> and 'B' Street`) Flo 4M4 Al l x e'er n i On December 17 , 1985, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit 85-77 and Conditional Exception 85-78 to construct a two-story office building with variances to permit seven parking spaces in lieu of (eight , one compact parking space, use of the alley for perking space turning area , a 0 ' side yard building setback along the south property line in lieu of 101 , and less than 10 ' wide landscaping in various locations along "B" Street and Warner Avenue . Condition Vo. 20 of approval was imposed as follows: 20 . Revised elevations shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and approval . Special attention shall be paid to providing aesthetically pleasing, long--lasting building materials and assuring compatibility with the surrounding area . On January 7 , 1986, the Planning Commission discussed the expansion of the Oakview Redevelopment Area as a non-public hearing item. Commissioner Erskine remarked that typical surrounding structures at Warner Avenue and beach Boulevard had stucco or brick siding, and emphasized to staff to keep these architectural similarities in mind when reviewing the design of new buildings in the area including the recently approved photography building . On January 21 , 1986 , the Design Review Board reviewed the two-story office building elevations dated January 15 , 1986. These elevations indicated wood siding on three sides of the building . The Board felt the building was compatible with the existing architecture 9n the vicinity . In addition, they agreed that the small structure in its location will not have the influence upon the Charter Center area , will blend in better with the abutting residential and will only impact adjacent parcels . However , because of the Planning Commission ' s interest of providing treater use of stucco on new buildings in the proximity of the Oakview Redevelopment area , tL:-, Board votcd to refer the elevations to the Planning Commission fore clarification on type of materials to be used on the exterior walls . On January 22, 1986 , the Planning Commission reviewed the elevations, dated January 15, 1986. They determined that stucco be provided on all sides in order to maintain continuity and to be :;ompatible with surrounding propertie3 . The Design Review Board on January 23 , 1986 , reviewed revised elevations dated January 23, 1986 , indicating stucco walls instead of wood siding as requested by the Planning Commission . The Buaro approved the revisions as reflecting the direction of the Planning Commission . Although the applicant submitted revised plans to the Design Review Board, he ,was not completely satisfied with the Planning Commission 's action of the meeting of January 22 , 1986 . subsequently, he filed an appeal to the Planning Commission 's ' }�, . action . The applicant desires wood or aluminum lap siding 'on ,'>•,,ree sides of the building as depicted on the elevation plans dated ,lanuary 15 , 1986 . RCA 3/3/66 2- ( , a283a ) r Staff has review,-d the revised elevations dated January 23, 118E and is recommending 'approval of them as recommended the Planning Commission with the requirement that additional wood treatment be provided on the walls around the windows and doers. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is categorically exempt under Class 3 , Section 15303 o� , the California Environmental Quality Act . FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. .},. ` ALTERNATIVE ACTION: I . f Approve the appeal .nd the elevations with wood siding dated January f 15 , 1986 as originally submitted by the applicant . ATTACHMENVS: j 1 . Appeal letter dated January 30 , 1986 2. Front Elevation dated January 15, 1986 (applicant 's `request) 3 . Front Elevation dated January 23, 1986 (as recommended by the +` Planning Commission ) 4 . Front Elevation dated Jansisry 23 , 1986 (as recommended by the staff ) 5 . Planning Commission minutes dated December 17 , 1985 6. Planning Commission minutes dated .January 7 , 1986 7 . Design Review Board minutes dated January 21 , 1986 8 . Planning Commission minutes dated January 22, 1986 9 . Design Review Board minutes dated January 23, 1986 JWP : SH: kla RC.A, 3/3/86 ,J1 J rs Va"ilfthommion PHOTOGRAPHYI'Nc,, CUR. FtF. UEST FOR APB C TrcriEN : N1rtTlhCTClit Cr: , w the buildini: at 8092 Warner v � h�}� u to�be� To cello ,, �, Uilt .with aluminum or wood siding. 47 'f?7. t REASONS: 1 . First; we went to the commission meeting on December 17 , 085 and they said: (4) ' The development shall comply with ill applicable t Provisions of the Ord"nance Ccde, Building Division, ' and the Fire Department. ( 17) Roof materials shall by of non--combo c table tile. ( 20) Revised elevations shall be submitted to the Design Review 91oard for review and approval . Special at;:ention shail b aid to providing esthetically pleasink, . long e p p ]acting, huildini; materials and and assuring compAtibili�y w I Lt' the surround i n(; area. " 2 . We then went to the Design- !(eview 13oard on Junuary • 21 , ' Scott He told me the, Design Review` 1foards' recommendation was to appro all of 'our -pl.aris. They relb we hhould o to * the•!dommissIo_n again because there wad, some talk ,of �s tuc.cn. T P They f+a1t in good conscience; tl'tey could not a prove , S ; the wood or aluminurrs . h.ing'iea. t) ation i was for. approval of everything `Y had' tubmit4ed. (714) R9R�7tx� t)r2'ri��m.ui�fyci�•t, Eitinten�,tc�►i f3cacf�, t.A ,�atr�1� .5 t� 3. We . then went to the: Commission meeting on January 221 1986. Ve told them we complied with everything they -had. 'asked for at they December 17, 1985 meeting. Thpy said that they did -not sl�h► want el We had to go back to the Design Review Board. 4. l:e went bask to the Desifm Review Hoard on JanL:ary 2) , 1986. The! 1, _ecommendation is to approve our plans, but they will iiot go against the Commission. 5 . We feel the proposed studio is in keeping w4 th the survounding area and that aluminum or wood tiding would fit in. We . feel a stucco building; with this design would be totally out of place. NOTE: The labels to notify the Property owners for a 300 square root radius are copied from original label: submitted to ' the City Council at a previous meeting. ' NOTE:,: Please put, os on your February 11 , 1986 meeting or the March 4 , 1986 meeting. I'will be out of gown in between the above stated dates . Thank You :�espe tfulay 'Submitteu (&" Paul Thompson v r a --A 1�,.* °.,0,y.�'I,.., :ti,,,��• � ��i'r1'�I��;,•�k,r ��•ri-�'lµr 1•�.Yr.'�ji+(� �r�+a1:^�����];.,�,♦'b�- •.'I�at.�.�A•�,�r.�r�r►T�lrti�f. • ..�.�. y�;���,:, '� .� 1 f 1 -I ..1�•. a- df7 . :•: ► �.• 1f.-' �' . 1.. +.. � '. Mr- .• � -. ..? •� �•. a!!a••'''ss��1'iA•'`•'Ss" ,i' .h'. K'I j•i• �1�1 �'* +'.t a ".•� � J'/ s11 ,M ... , : ` .._ 1 t '.r�"r `S .0 r!r��,�jr`,� 'r't�•Y:+!•�'K71»Yi1.F: L+, •.a'1� ♦• . _ 'l 'a."a, a, !' ♦ y' V tr J �� r � .'; • +•�^►��+',`.}�/•�rt�+w'raf����i�.� r , . �t �, • '}�'^•. t' s a w` �Y�'f �:a,'� s.?'��ar �•s t a���•w' .. t.,.It.'ar. 1.�t ,:,'l•�tr i'. hi.;..�+t /_• '• a.; � '/M+ °� Ott r r � t �f � t •r��' `"'>•.,'* � � ,.. _1 ' �.• , •fit r- ',. _ >,' .i - „' , , 1t,�' 1 1 - r Jy •y � I t Pal A4 so v , , it •, .. - �.. r•. :' - - �•---•�--•---_ ,. i •.•yam, a x - liy+'' -a I( �� .+-r...r- • -T 3'(...• y � .a.-•".'- �,. •.1• ►.r'•, i.R`� r.�--y Lea .. . ..�.1.y •.j.• ;_ �-. ..... ' %" a •' r�Ms.•-►�..+•w .}.��.�.�,w -r+�t•���•a,,.�V�aw,t••t,w+«r r,•�•... �. ...,, . • �•w�-��+r.r.�. %,�y�• t fiai{.'a' kr.�l� •1 :• J."...ii.w-....+.-... .., , ``•• - - .r+''��-� -�. .flan+ r. � 1r.• r,rr�.• 1"" ,r' f'+J • ,x 1 ��•.1 �, '� • I�O, � �' 'K r.r• � t• a ty �(.,L.•'.."'. •. (7l ��1 l '. • � f .. rw , �t I "' ,,`r. �. w 4•� y:►�i�"��i ••.r• .►�.r+► NTH +�'+�+..e.+:.a"'�'�'...� a -:* ^.` j r ,.., -,� Arw j"� .\ 1 ,1 ^• a +•.4 ,+d, ►. Z•.f i'I(i'r �!$•tf.I!i•J,,�,•+'t,t�.� �.aN,.�. l••:. . ,s,k .� t ; a n • :/r. ►:•' ' r ., •�,. r •,i�•k•rJ.- •.. .%'.'`r. 1• *�r •y ,,,�,ea� A.:'wa.r y•,• 'Zs=�•,_k '�•a` • '�- r. 1'.c`,�� •:+ ,,� •'+.t r' . .,•� ,,•••,� .r'+ ,r �xr �.- .f, .t':^• wJ••!_ .r.a,I ,, L A'„= .1'h ,�` ,�.J 1 ; 'T'j i�4 K � r��.♦ ,...� r<a'a;'.�.•�' .I,` L,�, !�.• .♦I.1, ., �L.^: • T ' ..r ..�.• ..•�- ♦,/ }} • '�, -1••-'a+: .y. 1� 'ttM1ryy a`T `• ,.7.'..�p,' .h .p• .a• M ja.;aM w:..,,'Nr••.,�.�•'•��.,.. ,.,.1. 3•y' ►. ���'��.:�f...,....-'J�•a4 �L.,J•. ��;xA.•.` ' •r,. -y•. �7;y:�• �fi4!I1�:•.a:•" i.`,t' i•Lt•..,.��f •�,.,� •.-,t �tl'.jr,.�;�1•�.-•', . •4... a,... - • ..^�.. ,r:•��t11 ,~ r•.! �1 -.s ��,.k► . w� "��1I�! ..i•. \, 1�. J. \ �'3 �If'�.• .r '.'.• •i} .G\ •� (•., S h '.r '^[� •'� a`L� ' (' 4!"'u�` a • 1' %+ :♦ �r 1ti t., t;p r \ ... � ?..� rL: 1 v.{•`..�"a, 't•�r y�, z�:•"•�� ''� r.�, ;4' ' t •,r��,!•' ^h +i.1, �\a•,;.'.. ,�-.� 4 f�• "r!" -N." ;r yt.•y� lt Y .!'rl, .Yrt :+�'. �, .f.�iR Al Y•' �vt ^1 tf. ', ,..•�' •+,.'!!-+ r "'L ,i v1 --'i.,•� _ i'''4 .�'' M.•Zy { is1M.+ •�a'►•(r . M •.j.t t -.-•� f� •�• i~l. ,1,. t, "M ,�,.• to -i: a +; / f (.. •♦ •ra•� . ,r.. a.:..+j,•fit._ 1:t'1 - -, M^ .1�•�"t>♦•.: ► .a :*:t► 1 Z 1i•"(�f {�/7wl r•' 1t,...1.k;'f'•.a;f� .,:.1'1►.i 1•NI •��;i t `L." '.4,�y,it;,�y.i`... •'��.,,,,,f ,..,•, •l�aa4 '�•�;�'r'r�� �` tCr►..i~,f�'�- �riY!'Jt y�i1'."'J.j���•i •r� s '4t '�'f►x � iN.w 1 +(•',� i •r�•r� +'• � •ti � �,M•t.•.r .6. 1 F�1 fib. w �'ya.,rani/. • ,• rya"- , �,/�}' tm •`i"t.'.YN:-� « .�.•„• +7',a°�'i""�'�r\t' �T4 • , x�"'yi/`,.�.��5,,,,.��.�rr H yl,��.••,'t J�-f'y +}�..rr,,�y�� i�'t��,,, f,: �+�•�A�',y"yv,+✓�'Y r't� '�kr't'h ' i-.tr�"r �•.'{yw- � .il�ti»a ,'•i'. i' ��p '. y�.,�•a.. .h.' � ,•�. .. 1 ••(M3♦ �I�r f;'�.�`e, x�•.++ .1�a I a•qs -!M,+Y•� „�,... k��r!• �1 �' I+iy.'^.t� F'J,1' `{'�� a«/fi' �' a`r.{j:+..!�S�'wr�•,� .t.y w ;,.�L'. i ��` F'" • ,. •:11 :i1'.S + .'�+' ra; ,� ''�'�'. �t`«Zr ."".;}�► �+s''�'s1 -•X=7.'q�j �_:r►`:'t•.' r,.l.y ' ��2'+j'�.'aS'• ..,w� ► ;. �,�.♦ . r{ t,��••,. *.(•• Y�f>S Lr�r. M• 1� `!S'. ••�r� Ayr� x.j: 7. 'I-��y,.4+rt•.,! .a,�r' �1" l�vt R.� •7t:�.�., `r•)'ir '�.,...�� =,r,Aa�� g':..t*I+r. `'►'`�';I • �••.�- �� �~ r•7•a 7«•� � �. ,l't r• I^ t '�'.i .;�,r}i�i• i:!�w^'�.':�d� '� `7.• .aR •• . 1 �4r•� ~ � �1 i,,-`," ••,tae. `�' ��r,- r t'rA •1 s „ c •j• I�=fir... �y, i— l+t Tt . Tile t ,~ '•� /^ �'1/r11 ' A .L r•.,,,,_ �j..i t . -ar •� � 1 'tr ` a(Z rat W �`;' "!L' I J �.t.�} y �t �Y � '� tir �►t�'''L {� - �— �i• yr a+ S� i1 w Lt !#,�,t x.`► ..s.r S' �INi� ti �!',+ _•17 ! .src;,":�kr: i r LYJ✓n.- !8'.�C=+"_i �l� �, l,�l.t .Jt i a - 4 1 t U, 'NORTH EL EVAwnON Amp WA 14 M lilt ITEMS NOT FOR PUBLIC HEARING i D--1 --1 CODE AMENDMENT NO. 8 5-17 rifi.cation on amendment approved December 3 , 19 , re ding Oldtown/Townlot Site Coverage . Applie o third floo decks . A MOTION AS MADE BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY RJAHANGIR TO REQUEST C IFICATION ON THE AMENDMENT, AP OVED DECEMBER 31 1985 , REGAR -NG OLDTQWN/TOWNLOT SITE COV GE. (REQUEST: NO DECKS ON ROOF F SECOND FLOOR WHERE THE IS 55% LOT COVERAGE ) . STA WILL PREPARE A REQU TO SEND THE AMENDMENT BACK TO THE PLAN G COMMISSION FOR REPORT PRIOR TO IT BEING ACTED ON BY THE CI COUNCIL. AYES: Winchell , umacher orter, Mirjahangit NOES: Livengood (di not iderstand the motion , procedurally) ABSENT: Rowe ABSTAIN : Erskine MOTION PASSED D--2 EXTENSION OF TIM FOR CONDITIONAL US PERMIT NO. 84-31 AT MAXN AND FLORIDA FO 48 UNIT SENIOR APARTM TS . A MOTION BY RSKINE AND SECOND BY MIRJAHA IR TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITION USE PERMIT NO. 84-31 B THE FOLLOWING NOTE: AYES Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood, Erski , Porter , Mir jahangir S: None BSENT: Rowe ABSTAIN: None ION PASSED D-3 PLANNING COMMISSION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON EXPANSION OF OAKVIEW REDEVELOPMENT AREA Commission reviewed the report . A survey area encompassing the entire Beach Boulevard corridor within the City°s jurisdiction will Forthcoming. Commissioner Erskine remarked that while driving east on Warner towards Beach Boulevard he noticed the areas surrounding the proposed photo shop project . All the aurrounding structures had stucco or . brick siding and that he ' hoped staff , at the design review, would ki;!ep these architectural similarities in mind . and require some attractive, permanent, non-wood siding for the entire project . pC ' Minutes 1/7/86 t , ...,a..k......,. n ..y:'.Y_ i11t:Y'ii 1't'^. 1. 't•M4.0.'/t'..Mti+t 1. ..i`11.`..i: ,. 1 ... ]:. �_:,:.,Y' _._. _ _. _. I DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Date: January 21 , 1986 - 2 : 00 P. M . Boar6 Members Present : Smith , Godfrey, Martinez, Adams Staff Present : Hess Design Review_ N o . 86-9 : Elevations o _fie PFioFo9ra2hX Building - on -Warner Avenue and "B " Street use Permit No . 5- Con idit oral. Exception No . 85--78 Staff presented the proposed architecture on the two story office building . Proposed building materials includes grey concrete shingles , light grey l " x 6 " shiplap siding on three sides of the structure, zero property line side has stucco, burgandy 1 " x 6 ' framing stripe around the building , and small pane glass windows . Staff indicated that the Planning Commission stipulated in their conditions of approval that the Design Review Board review and approve revised elevations . They wanted special attention paid to providing aesthetically pleasing, long lasting building materials and compatibility with the surrounding area . Wayne Penny, architect , was present to answer questions . Mr . Penny felt his elevations were approved by the Planning Commission and therefore was not ready to discuss any changes to his elevations . The Board reviewed the proposed elevations and felt the building is compatible with existing architecture in the vicinity, which does not conform to any common theme; there .is a lack of architectural � consistency within the area . The proposed architecture makes a good transiti.cn between the office building to the west and residential to the east . Board member Glen Godfrey indicated that the intent of the Commission was not to permit all wood on each side of building; they desired a combination of wood siding and stucco . He requested t;-�. Board to take the Planning Commissions recommendation into consideration . Discussion regarding the Commissions intent took place . Hoard member Martinez indicated that he wanted to review the architecture in this area by field inspection before commiting his vote . The Board recommended approval based upon the buildings color and materials as presented because the small structure in its location will not :have influence upon the ChartL-r Center area, will blend inn . better with the abutting residential and will only impact adjacent r r r. 1 7-7 'Y parcels . Fur t;ier,'; discussion ensued , there were varied thoughts - regarding the elevations such as a combination of wood siding and stucco, all wood siding or all stucco, the Board dial not want to override the Commission intent and recommended the applicant obtain clarification from the Planning Commission ON MOTION °BY SMITH AND SECOND BY GODFREY, THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REFERRED THE ELEVATIONS BACX TO THE Pi,ANNING COMMISSI011 FOR CLARIFICATION ON TYPE OF MATERIALS TO BE USED ON EXTERIOR WALLS OF USE PERMIT NO. 85-77 AND CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 85-76, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Adams , Godfrey, Smith , Martinez NOES: None ABSTAIN: None SH: jr (d251d ) ! ii I� f I,t j, l is A 31 iE :k ,l 4 — _. APPROVED 214186 MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers - ivic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beac , California TUESDAY, JANUARY 221 1986 - 7 : 00 PM CALL TO ORDSR PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL P P P P P P ROLL CALL: Rowe, Winchell , Sc macher , Livengood, Erskine, Poster , P Mirjahangir (Commissione Erskine was present from 7 : 23 PM until 9 :00 ?M) A. CONSENT CALEND A-1 Minu s December 17, 1995 Planning Commission Meeting' A MOTION AS MADE BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY MIR►7AHANGIR TO APPROVE . INUTE'S OF DECEMBER 17 , 1985 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES• Rowe, WinchNll, Schumacher, Livengood , Porter , Mirjahangir N 5: None SENT: Erskine 6STAIN: None MOTION PASSED B . ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND COMMISSIOH ITEMS: B-1 Paul Thompson, Paul Thompson Photography, requested approval from the Commission on his proposed elevations for a- photo store located at Warner and 'B" 'Street . lie felt he was meeting all conditions of approval of his Use Permit which was approved by the Planning Commission . He was before the, Planning Co;n,miss`ion because the Desivn Review eoa'rd did ntJt approve his elevations because of the use of wood siding ,aQ opposed to stucco . The item was tabled until Commis,nioner Erskine arrived . �' T T i Upon. Commissioner Erskine 's arrival the need for additional stucco was discussed and it was determined that additional ;I stucco is needed in order to be compatible with the surrounding area. MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSKINE, SECOND BY PORTER TO APPROVE AND CLARIFY THE CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 85--77 AND REQUIRE MORE STUCCO IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN CONTINUITY WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTIES BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Schumacher , Livengood , Erskine, Porter, mir jahangir NOES : Winchell ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : None MOTION PASSED e-2 Bill Holman, Huntington B•aach Company, asked for permissio to speak later on Item D�-1 (not a public hearing ) . B- 3 Lorraine Faber, Amigos de Bolsa Chica, asked for p i3sion to speak on Item D-1 . She stated that the public d' not know what is being proposed and that there was real oncern. She requested that there be a public access to and a public hearing on the item . B-4 Richard Short, opposition to Item C�-1 anted to speak against Item C-1 again because the public h wring was closed. He asked for conformance to the Gene 1 Plan and presented a resolution prepared by adjacent eighbors to the property site . B-5 Lance Berry, opposition to em C-1 , .toted for the record that he was not against _ for projects , just against high density projects . h ©-6 MOTION WAS MADE BY CHUMACHER SECOND BY LIVENGOOD FOR STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOL ON FOR DORIS FERGUSON, DEDICATED, FORMER CITY EMPLOYEE THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : owe, Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood , Porter , Mirjahangir NOES : None ABS L : Erskine XMO IN: None N PASSED PC Mi3 utes. .:1/22/86 , -7� k1 a� T D smi REVIEW BOARD MINUTES Date: January 23 , 1986 - 2 : 00 P. M. Board Members Present : Smith , Godfrey , Martinez , Adams Staff Present: cress Design Review No . 86--4 : � Elevations of the Photo rah Buildinq on Warner and "B° Street (Use Permit No . con ik ona Excep l6n No . 85-78 ) Wayne Penny presented revised elevations with stucco walls instead of wood siding as requested by the Planning Commission . Brief discussion ensued . Board Member Smith made the statement that the Board was reluctant to approve the revised plan , which included mostly stucco walls . but sent b the Planning Commission limited the e direction felt thY 9 latitude of the Board to approve anything other than what was presented to them today . The Board felt this plan could have included more wood siding. Board member Martinez 's position was that a combination of wood siding/stucco was more appropriate in order to provide a transition between the residential to the east and the building next door including other structures to the west . Other board members were in agreement with such treatment . Brief discussion ensued . ON MOTION BY GODFREY AND SECOUD BY SMITH , THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPROVED THE REVISED ELEVATIONS DATED 1/23/86 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE AYES: Adams, Godfrey, Smith NOES: Martinez ABSTAIN: None SH . Jr ( d2Sld ) 1 i Publisli 2/20/66 1 NM ICE OF Ptn=c FMARIM APPM TO FLAMING C IMUSSICN'S CCNDITIC N #20 OF f USE PERMIT #85-77 & C CMITICNAL MOL3 CN #85--78 NOTICE IS HEPMY GIVEN that the iimtingtan Beach City 'Ccx=il will hold a public hearing in the Council Cha:itex at the Huntin tox-i Beach Civic Center, 20M Main Street, tb .tingtcn Beach, California, on the date and at tre time indicated Lelcw to receive and consider the statements of all persons W o wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Mtnday, March 3, 19E6 TIME: 7:30 P.M. IDEtTrIFIC ATIM 1914E Zt: COMITIM M OF USE PETRIT 85-77 & 0ONDITM AL EXOTIC N 85-78 LOCATIM: 6092 darner Avenue (southwest, corner of Warner: Avenue and "B" Street) PROPOSAL: An appeal to the Planning Ccmissicn's requirement for additicnal stucco on the elevations of the proposed &.otcgrart-,y building (UP E5»77 & CE 85--76) RWIFCNMENTAL S'M7M The proposed project is categorically exempt fran the rrcvisicr.s of the California Environmental Cmality Act. CN FILE: A cciy of the request and a legal descxipticn Is on file in the ftepartunnt of Develop rient Services. ALL WERF.SM PERSCM are invited to attend said bearing and express opinions or submit evidence fer or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, ard descriptia-z of this pxcpcsal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, H ntimton Peach, california, for inspection by tr.e public. K1Ih'I'IPX7lW BEAM CITY CC=IL By: Alicia M. Wentwerth City Clark Pll-� (714) 536-WS Dated February 18, 1986 171, , rr , Date: 'C. *S;;r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AM APP 1 . ca t Num er Re nest On NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will. hold a public hearing in _'ie Council Chamber at the Huntington tseach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the ,Ipp.lication described below, APPLICATION NUMBER: �' Q 92E QE .. � —2fff APPLICANT: ��... .� LOCATION: mp= z4 11 RLam: AN ' VqW ■ J'!- �VTW ON "k ,�'t "kyw J M 5 l ENVIROMMENTAL STATUS: fw-jde�� oft ` � • f f 0. fit j 1 - ' ; 014 FILE: A , � I ana,, n► i s o rt file in the Department of Development Se Mces . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and ' express opinions or submit evidence for or against the appltiation as outlined above . All. applications, exhibits , and deacr ipt ions of this proposal are on file with the office of the City Clerk , 20PO Main Street,, Huntington Beach , California , f-,r inspection by the � public. James W. Pal. in, Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission Phone !714 ) 536--5271 t0260D? ,..,. ,.• ♦,, 1:..`'? ..L2:,'. ,ai:;n+:4t5ww'•: - ,.'rsI'll .. s4n.4f,, r. .i.l,; .ae1'4.' .,�_',.. —'_`'•.:__� .. _. _.. •c M D, tt- I07t 100�-32' . 167-321-05 r /��P� '��'�•'Z• Ni�,w.- � ' t67-3z1-21 $ xIIL AP.4un, HOSES A 16932 Al.SIK£ET ��9/�Ik{,I �>wr 252 K14OX STREET 170112 A�STREi�i�a��3�, ���-7 HUNTINGTON BEAC11 CA 9:;47 COSTA MESA CA 92bZ7 � � ` I1Utl?If1Ct'ON t3EAClf c.� 92647 root , 107-100-33 167-321-06 167-321-22 Est , XADLEY, GE ALD B BORGES, RICIIAND ...c ;k W' GRIGER, NARY LOUISF 16942 A STREET ,ct - s � 912 120% STREET `'HUNTINGTON BE'ACi( CA 42b 7 CA 92647 1IUtiTINCTf1N ij�lCfi 1:A ')2r���t3 � �-��13 5// . 107-100-35 167-321-07 167-321-23 PARK VIEW MUTUAL WATER CLUB ROUE, STEPREII C CITY OF IIUl,"T INGr l'Ot4 HEACH 16911 A STREET P.O. BOX 244 HUNT11% ,rON HfjtCll CA 92048 HUNTIWGTON BEACH CA 92647 SURYSIDE CA 90743 � c/o CITY IUJA, t 107-100-52 167-321-08 i 167-324--01 SCHOOL OCEAN VIEW DISTRICTRO`ai:, ST:�PIII:N C .::Y OF 11Utunwrim suc(( 17021 BEACH ALVV. 8H P.O. BOX 244 HUNTIN(7rOtl REACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON REACH CA 92647 SURFSIDE CA 90743 c/o CITY HALL, 107-100•-67 167-321-15 167-324-02 STEWAR:, JAKE R SCHLEY, I.AWHr6% E 1) ; SECURITY TITLE I11SI AUCE CO. P.O. BOX 248 6692 HARBOR }BEY CIRCLE 3 P.O. BOX 1589 SAN ANDRES CA 952A9 � llUKTI11M- 0?1 ULACH CA 92648 SAN DI GO CA 92112 c/o TnUSTOPT 1440 107-100-68 167-321-16 1 167-324-03 STEWART, JAKE P. f BROWN,R01;ERT E SECURITY TITLE It1Slll(At1CF CO. P.P. BOX 248 3357 BURTON AVE0E P.P. BOX 1589 SAN 1M3RES CA 9�249 O ' .iF 7 0 SA!1 DIEGO CA 921 12 . � R SE1 .l1D CA 91 7 1 1 C/o TRUST 01♦T 144n 167-12 1-01 :u l-3;. 1-!7 167-J24-04 i'!ANDiC, ROBERT R ' HEAL., DORRIS ULT.OA,JORGI: 4 I II1tIVINA 12669 LANAKILA LANE 171162 A STREET l7u31 A ST"EET GARA£N GROVE CA 92641 11UNTINCrUtV BEACH CA 92647 11UNTINGTIIN BEACH CA 92647 167�321-02 ! 167-121-18 i 167-324-05 MURRAY, VIOLA B SCHLEY, LAWREUCE D 1 DI Sl~CtiA, UIi.I.',A?t 8081 DOLSA AVrNUE 1 1120 PACIFIC COAST 11t1Y 13417 GKAPARA AVENUE MIDWAY CITY CA 92655 11UNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 j LA HIRAbA CA 90633 • 167-321-'03 167-321-19 b1 167-324-06 e SUNDANCE-PROPERTIES LTD SALAfWICA, DONINCO r ' ` • 19145 SLOOMFIELD STREET 19290 ROSETAN AVENUE � ♦ 7 a• `1'z � 34`0 A►4�ter 5 , 1111M ♦ ON 8 AC11 LA 92647 `CERRITOS CA 90701 CERRITOS CA 90701 c/o NEW $r'EST hEALTY i 167-324-07 167-321-04 167-321-20 � LONG, FtF,X R ROCCO PIilLIP 1 TR Mcla-GOYtaI, CRATI., K Clrl40OD STREET t �fi� i13032 I�ltfi P.O.r.cl. aoX 9531 4ROVTo CA 92643 11UNTLt?Urr B&%Q1 CA 92647 !ti` 7iI8 ' ` t FOURIaAllf VALLEY CA 92 t a 167 H 11 7 . 167-374- IL 167-331-32 WAftliM D ACII. COMPANY INC. - CH01, BYEOUr. CHUL G DONG I1 17642 BEACH BLVD 81.42 MAJOR CIRCLE ! INGTON`Bl�;ACII CA 92647 HURTIN(..TOFI DEACIt CA 92647 167-324-12 167-33;-33 LU}Ji�, RICK L TR CASTO,_ DAISEI► LRF 3151 AIRWAY AVENUE It-1 8132 MAJOR CIRCLtr COSTA TIESA CA 92626 NUNYItiCTO;i BEACH CA 92647 167-331-03 167-331-34 SULLIVAN. LAWRENCE J krk RUIZ, At. JR 1215 RIVERVIEW DRIVE 6541 WALTON DRIVE F11LBROOK CA 92028 1 }iUNCItiGTOt 'ACFI CA 91647 167-331-04 STELLRECHT, ROBERT 1. I HUh"TIN6T014 BEAGII CA 92647 167-331-05 i OCEA}} VIEW HUTUAL WATER 4 17062 A STREET I HUNTINGTON BF•ACII CA 92647 ' c/o BEAL, DORIS 167-331-07 SULLIVAN. LAWRENCE J TR 1215 RIVERVIEV DRIVE ' FALLBROOK CA 92028 i 1 167--331-08 SULLIVAN, L.:WRENCE j 1215 RIVERVIEW DRIVE � FALLBROOK CA 920:8 j i 167-331-29 f ' CERTEZA, ANGELES P 5372 SHREWSBURY AVFIIUl: WESTMINSTER CA 92683 ti 167-331--30 1 WONG, TOK4Y J 5tiS ,S S. LAFAYETTE PARK rtAGE S LOS ANrF.LES CA 9C057 ! UNIT 204 - TAWLITIS, CY'TIS A 1 . 306 CALIFORNIA STREET 1II}1J'1'211GTON BEACH CA 9264 8 t t �-••- .-ate - ftry....,:., ,� .tv.+.�lww, <w.. ..J ..•Rti„,;,iM* ..,. ..<:..-.,.ai w,•...✓. „.. .., .,. �.�...� r. r r , Publish 2120/66 NUI'IC E`OF PUM,IC HWIM , APPFAL M HiAM12r1C; CCMSKIN S CXxiDmcm OF USE PE ' T #85-77 OCNDITICKAL Ei WTri #85--78 N ricE IS HE MW GIVEN that the Huntington Peach City Council will hold a public hearing in .the Cc=cil Chamber at the Huntington Error Civic Center, 20M Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated telow to receive and consider the statements or' all perscns vft wish to be heard relative to the application described below. WE: ttnday, March 3, 10186 TILL: 7:30 P.M. IDENrLFICATICN IVCAMBM: . CONDITICaN s i0 C)F USE PER!1T e5--77 b' XtZITICIML EXC'EPrIC K 85-78 IACATICN: SG92 Warner Avenue (southwest corner of Warner Avenue and "B" Street) FRDPOEAL: An appeal to &} a Planning Corr r i tsicn's requirercnt for ' additianal stucco on the elevations of tlx proposed photcr* aphy building (UP 6S-77 & CE 8�-76) SrAnG 7be proposed project is categorically exempt frcr,► the provisions of tt-,e Califurnia Ihvi raviental Quality Act. CN FILE: A copy of the request and a legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL IN'I1:FcE.STfD PEPSCNS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descripticnr of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 20M Main Streeti, Huntington Bea&., California, for inspection bjr the public. hUk TIWIW BEAM CITY COUNCIL L By: Alicia M. Wentwcr th City Clerk Phcr'.e (714) 536--5405 Dated FebrtAry 181 1985 ,p, is I a. =J , , r IL %, Si�S�#ems"�tt + '�