Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUse Permit 86-17 - Negative Declaration 86-18 - William H. W _ � , - - .ri1IR: :.-.,..-.-..:..4.•.r ram.... -- �- �Sf iE T.�..-... ,... .-ln....�...���� 37 Auln,r►tM to Puttw, Advertrsorn+eKils otk ,rds w4WM9(1,1104 : s� noh o cal by OCf oo of MO scperlo► t;ou4� of oratio• County, ,�- California, `eumoar a•6214 dated 29 S601161"0e1 1961. snd A-2483�, Oita0 i I tune 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange 0.0.4 +«.�. .,..�....� t....a r 17 o.0 :aw OWF4 •r "rrm a Citizen of the United Slates and a resident of .! Ime County atoresmad. I am over the age of eighteen / years. and not a party to or interest" in the below { entil!ed matter I am a principal clerk of the Orange f. Coast DAILY PILOT, with wrucri is combined the t NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation. panted and published in the C►fy of Costa Mesa. County; of Orange. State of California. and that a Nottce of PUBLIC .HEARING i of which cony attacned nereto is a true and complete copy, wai printed and aUolis:lea in the Costa Mesa, fwntac nttaMa ahrck To .; Newport Beach. Huntington Seacrt. Fountain Valley, CRM I— M to�' f Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna eeala°� t>etfw:"owl? Beach issues of said newspaper for ONE TINE wlwetntWIM NOTICE SAnHEREBY consecutive vieeks to wit the i33utXs) of tGraA uua its. )t<0drigton Beam City Count wilt rk-Ad a put be"air sq in ere eoun-' a Cfsarr►ba► of ma Hunt- Vioan Beach Ckft CAnta►, 2000 KAI- June 26 6 �u>3�sr�&rlia.on ft e:se and al n»wria 1M _ .,.... .' , calo mated r VW n 10ne us Lola"to I �at PtJ" NOTKE t9B as parscx+a +Aso wah tow Oct Is e med by figrttvia fswa roath►i tot" apes DMdwatkn No.es.ta cxdm dsecr*4d below. :�ON rME:;A eeooqq of tt>• DATE 4or", A0y y. taaer Perrrtrs fie`,ai-17:and t98.._..... 1t I T:ao r*i Napatw+ t�rrctaratbn Ito: APPLfCATiON lK7tAt3E}! 1WIS is on fftef In ttfe oltko . ADpaat to PWW�np Cans- eft Dav+Marnsrrst Jarvinaa. 108 mrwon's darstM of Nee Vey- aO S`am fnvo fro aii- rnn Nix in-In"aoatM oat• :J m ftw Nesill " aps. baatlors NO "_is 0041*nr Of sub""Msrsce LbCATIQNt; Northeast I for or flQ l l the rppM• PROPOSAU An appeal AN ,atttascattorsf :e�rbtA flaw by•_Cotarscbw.r Dorf wd;:tsaaartvtkfrra i tlsie Mae:AalWevr to INPlw+avq. IpIptiglitA are an fM rvfM. ttsa cart.am Corre isiviowe derstal ct_Uas Main$tttM�Hunt I declare, under penalty a! perjury, that the Parent No,ats.u,oictt M. flarrcft*c„ . ,n° r� foregoing is true and correct. �•`a"n�`•vp•'al Is. 9 9m�atoMi►cM besaad an" to tf+e• CITY,C�1M'�;'tap ot:net auvporurs9+ aaL.Mht L of Oon+rr+�aan'r 'hews • dental beca�w flea wtlattrsp COW:Jwse 24,IS",.;'i, Executed Of7 J�P � _�.. 198 6 w«f its.a.ne er..be" '. Py�tsad Or srN V II It fa 2 f t7a,ri,Pita iwm�"I,., -at- sta Mesa, Calita�-nip, ttNvffloffa N T A L , .6TATLft Tfw onvoerA pre J `� T1f0 tit ,F fir_... .� •Signature ! ,100) 7 "001rrMICATION a . R Tim `i play Z5 j 1986 Mr Michael J . Tebr;ch ' 17206.1 Marina View P1. t nunting..n Beach, C.M. 92649 Dear Mr. Tebrich� i As ;a real estate broke,c and Certified appralser, I would like -to addrP;ss your..,4�estion of effect of apartments and or condominiums ir, close proximity to single family M+ residential property. In evaluating current property. values obviously the specifies of each-location such as age , square footage of lot and structure , condition of hcm' a are the primary sources j'A Valuation. Also of importance are the surround-Ing areas and neighborhood that zither add to or subtract from the value of the residence being appraised. s Each Residential Aorrainal report has an area for comments including factoru addingto value or decreasing value . In:;reviewing numero;;a ai,prsi.sals that I and others have done in a: situation such as yours -the closer the multi-residential units to your area i he, mare your:prop- erty is negatively. effected . In viewing your ne ighborhood � and the custom design^d and . built homes the leas would have greater negative impact :than if the homes were of lesser value . This is basically because of the ex- trsne contrast frim current existing sirdle family homes and -the comriete opposite of having rentals, en the same block. , Speaking as an mppralser, the more homogeneous the neighbor- hood the greater the value of the properties. An I'm sure you. are akiire rentals bring a transient individual, or groups of in6f.viduals, not the optimam situation for � property values in a community such as yours . SAncerexy, t Terry, eavens Sunset Appra'isal Service J TNIph y, , .......r�...•r-•-^..^�"'�""_"':: yr .+.,wr.wwa•T..+,yT-»+.ye})'i\:.1)w'• a,_ .<<. ... .. _, —'-— TFRRY W. KEAA s . ` llun �erlia Lns�. ... .� _ Narrisd gt Un ;BeMch, CA �26� 9 Age: ,yc` ,a.r. e Talsrh-7ne (714) 84o-k nl SS#54-7-72-019 LUSINESS EXPEMEXCE 4,17 3 to 6/7 6 BANK 07 AMERICh., - Anaheim Office • Real Estate Appraiser - Experience , in single family resid cone prodtwing residential, ine4istria1 and sommerc'ial properties having values of $25 , 000 to $4,0001000, Bill Rainer - Appraisal Depprtment HeAd I /76 to 12/76 HERCl RY SAVINGS AND LOAN Huntington BeAch Main Office Class III Staff Appralaer handling primarily ' the larger inc7me p�roducing.;propert'.no in Orange County. � hob Warden C.-ief Apprateer 12/7 6 to 6/7 7 SERIAL BARK - Airp »vt Hain Office ce Staff App'- aiser under Frank DeLuca. Reipoinsible fo , Orange County area appraisals of all ty'p e propert iea . 61'77 to S-resent SUNSET APPRAISAL SERVICE Self owned and operated service specielixi.ng in single family dt!ellings , Major clients : Securit y Pacific National Hank - Chr,'a Ferrsaniio, xo e Ingelis SEcon2 ` NEJo'ee�.rAppFaisal n6par ment Wells Faro Bank - Guy Williams ; Read Estate Appraisal apartment Bank of America - Woody E. Torkelsen, San Bernardino Appraise oMc e I Have been approved by F.N.M.A. under each previous employer, the last approval number being 04-31997 . LOOK PROPERTIES, INC. - ;MV. BEACIt, CA. � ` Part timc.' associate broker. EDUCATION 1964 1966 Glendale Jr. College, Glendale, California A. A. Degree in General Education and Geology 1966-1967 California State College , San Diego, California Major in Business Administration 1970-1972 California State University , Long Bea ch, Carl.;farnia B. S . Degree in Business Administratinn with major in Real Estate Finance. Subjects related to job. interests: Introduction',to Real Estate Peal 'Estate ,Ap'pral sing steal Estate -Investment Real Estate Fininte .Real Estate Law A. I .R.E.A. Course � lA - Basic Principles, Methods and Tech'nlgiiis . SR.E.A. Course 201 - Principles cif Income Property Appraising i AWk 2(v L a.t. r-/ 00, r,/ ��•V�rI �•�....-/ �t�`tM��-l���L•�I� • � i y�r VM- "� Y���. li��V�✓�V � L��r a,.l �!"Y�•c�c..•L•�,Y'Ct. c� u!.riV►- Lr ��+�C� ����r 4vu— / 1 n �•j1 Gw��ii•t-t.�4� li� L�("'1�L-1j't,!"�' � !� •�t/'i1.� � t�.�jt�.�,� �• 1•t.a•.i-✓ . �� � � ��L'C�•�.�` IrLt..�..T�" �.- +.F'y"Ls•-rG �•. ►. /_ ,• t•iL. C.�-._. �'1i(�c-tf-�.�G � �r'�e�.�t�:T�- tv�•-a�'., ,�.-�.-sL� �fc��c.t.:..tir �' .t1 c•� •- r,r fc C�•v'�• r.. G 'L� 41A..4rel c.c�• trs rt.,,�.•� ✓tr� t�'�ra• LY:c L L 14�A`r ,��"L�•r>• C,,C�.�L�...- .•�. / / t•,c,v '- ..r ��•!..'1� �cj.C.�-c.y ,mot!c ell ell V are ool IL 0 1� ��,,... G'Gt,:.�.:�'c,-,�,�..� ftisy►�t.c._. �.th.�,.c•�.�. ..,..Z-v-t-Z� - .r- t�•' .-tr G��t--fur c.� d �.✓'��t._C;� .�'vt,..t .�••-�.••'�s.:..,�L. .��•-d?.t-�9'' 1 - ✓�.�t w-e_c.� ' r.d'�r�-Gr (t L G •'� axle., 4f ,�,� ,/'� tr •- •� � •AVM • L-.-�:1 ►�.;L�t's1c,,•.�� �'►�G..G►�+C.-�crJ�,yyv�..t.r�. ��/�.�..r ,�.G..j•1-�+.Il..�-�t-4-s. .�f/�'`' � ZZLG • �lZ-tee.�i�•H-� , seQ.-(..,�►�•liz,1.� •i`� S� �'_- 7 L �1.I �•�-a v�G 1..�.- i +�/(r`C./t,/l, /�•y '�..� /�1��y 1.s3•r•{/��.� �.'�.t ,�.4�•4�••'►.!4t�Ci�1' �r1L'+�t�C.Lt a:CMG �►•�,•• . � �+�•" �_ t w� ;. CITY OF 1-i UNTING T ON BEACH 2OW MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 926M OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERIC July 15, 1986 Jerome M. Bame , Attorney at Lair 2130 Main S�reet Huntington Beach, CA 92648 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting meld tlonday, July 7, 1986, denied your appeal re* ative to Use Permit No. 66-17, and approved your project as recorimended with findings and conditions of the Planning Commis ion. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from July 15 , 1986 to apply to the courts for judicial review, If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office -- 536-5227. Alicia M. Wentworth , City Clerk AMW:CB:bt Enc. CC: City Attorney Development Services Director - Bill Wilson 16961 Bolero Lase Huntington Beach, CA 92649 iL _..... .r.en �tt_..r rC4'nni• .. .sr.K. r ...... . .rr .. _. —__ _ --_.— _ _._ _ - ` .. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEA H ' -,. 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK July 11 , 1cII6 Jerome M. Bame, Attorney at Law 2130 Main Street 1 Huntington Beach, CA The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, July 7 , 1986 denied your appeal relative to Use Permit IIo. 86•-17, and approved your project as recommended findings and conditions of the planning Commission. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California you have ninety days from July-11 , 1986 to app'y to the courts for judicial review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office - 536-5227. /I Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt Enc. CC: City Attorney Development SE vices Director - Bill Wilson 16961 Bolero lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 fYM.ph. s 7144131142 7I 1 .+• ..w`•'/ '.tL'.w.wt i.....'r K1- _ .` ri.. • .ter. I PETITION In 'Support 'Of Use Permit 'No. 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Pr 'Jict On , Warner. Xvenue at _ 6r,ion Scree t Huntington ]Beach , 'California We, the. 'undersigned, being residents of the City of 'Ht n' ington Beach, California, do 'he* eby SUPPORT the -proposed construction -'of, an 11 unit'-- apartment project, as unanimously approved'-tiy the ,'Baa d ( of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Nuntington peach, being UsP ` Perfiit I No . 86-17 , an Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the Cityof Huntin to 5 n Beach, California: DATED: , ,�.L�.,cr3 19 8 6 Mesident ' (Address ) DATED: 1986: Res ent Address 1: DATED: , 1986 : (Real ent3 f A, a rtas . li - , PETITION In Su ort `Of 'Use , Permit No. 86-17 J Proposed Construction of an Pro 11 -Unit .Apartment P ' . t On Warner Avenue at 'Orion Street ' jr Hu'ntington Beach, California �t Wei the unde'rsi ned, bei�n 9 c residents 'of the City of ' Huntington. . 9 c3ov7o�►h►os` - Beach, Ca l i fornia X do hereby SUPPORT the Proposed construction of an 11-=unit apartment project, as unanimously ' approved 'by t Board of ZoningAdjustments of the City of Huntington Beach; being. Use Permit ] Y 9 5. No. 86-170, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City `of Huntington Beach, California f DATED; 1986 : Resident (Address ) F ) 4; DATED: , L �1`+� (Res de t ) 7 !o 'U 'tL�.: ( Address) DATED: 1986 : (Resident) , (Address ), a'tNa1Ye� y *u' ^'; .1�4. .. ,f. I�•, Li`�A'Sr ♦•,f1M tiri .._K.,..... ,E,.:.4Y n A fd-!r ',..: .-,� r. _ .•;ti ,,, .,i. �, PETITION 3; In Support Of Use Perrin - PP, t No. 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11- Unit Apartmejit Proeat On Warner Avenue at `Orion Street ' Huntington Beach, C'alif•ornia We, the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction ` of 11n 11-unit 'apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning A n Bea , ' g Adjustments of the City of Huntington ch, being Use Permit No. 86-17 , on Warner. Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of 'Huntington Beach , California : 1986 : DATED. ! - 1 (Resod t ) (Addres ��� 19 8 6 : ��/ •��" ` � DATED: �I, �,_ . (Res dent ) f (Address) --WX DATED: , 1986 : (Resident) A ress' r r r PktITION In Supp ort Of Use Permit No . 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11 Unit' Apartmne t .. " �t P.roject On Warner, Avenue at Orion Street ; a ' K6ntin ton Beach, Caiiforni'a We , ithe undersigned, being reb'idents of the 'City , of Hunting,. ton Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed constructionof an l l `unit apartment - project, as unanimously approved , by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being • Use Permit No. 86-1,71 'on Warner Avenue at Orion Street; in the City of Huntington Beach , California : DATEDs , 1986 J tResi ent j (Address I?ATEi3: 9 8 6 : , (Resident) (Address ) 2 . DATED. (Resident ) { .00 w yt; A e i-9 . •..� nor; . .w. ..>•Pti.crr.m. „s.rx. 7'.V+1T,N•:13"wrr�f7a'�!>�i.'D�w+ww.�. , r . r , I PETITION in Supp©rt Of Use Pe'rmi't No. 86-17 Pro used Construction of an 11•-Unit A artment Pr'oect On War:zer Avenue at Orion Street • Huntington Beach, ''CaUfoi rnia I f the Ca.t of Hu We , the undersigned, being residents o y ntington Beach,, California , do hereby ' SUPPORT the pzoposed construction of n '11-un].t a artment project , x.; E , d a• p oject , as unanimously approved by the Board stments of the Cit of Huntin" ton' Heach be �i Use Permit' : of Zoning Adju y g , 9 1 17 , on Warmer Avenue at Orion Str' eet, in 'the City 'of Auntingt'o,n Beach, Call"f'ornia r <. DATED: ' , 196 6 : Mesident � � .. ( Address ) r; {. AL e • DARED. T � � l98 G . � .ter._.__._ .,. j ( Res ent 1 r (Address) i r x DATED: 1986 : Resident • - - I4. '-' 1. PETITION f{ I Support Of Use ' Permit No. 86-17 d u Propose Constre tion-of an I1-knit `Ftoartment Project On Wainer,Avenue dit Orion Street Huntington Bech, Californi -, g a We , ' the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntingto'ri Beach , California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-un it apartment project, as unanimously approved by the Hoard of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being- Use Permit. No. 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington Beach, Call f ornia: M1J l ' DATED: , J 9 8 6 ' (Re ent ) I (Addreg ) DATED: 1 ► (Resident) re • �^ (�dd s l p Jr 1986 . DATED : . O (Xe ident) d. 'r'• ' 1 ad • ., is •. i ! .y PETITION . In' Support Of Use Permit No . 86-17 Px"oposed `Construction of an I1-=Unit Apartm j ent Project On Warner 'A . venuie at Orion Street ;� g n Sesch , tali,, Huntin to 'to We , the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington .;. Beach, 'California , do hereby ` SUPPORT the proposed construction of . an 11-unit apartment pro5ect, as unanimously approve 'by the' Baard of Zoning Ad ustments of the City wf Huntington Beach, being Use -Permit No , 86 17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the City of Huntingto n •Beach, California : F' DATED: G ; vt 19 8 6 : �' � } (Resident ) + Me 34 '1_ ( Address ) DATED : �j "'r ,.. � 1986 : ' ( side» (Address) i i DATED: 19 86 '. --f- (ReefidenfV ) 9�C�' t _ FF Awwk PETITION In Support Of Use Feimf t No . 8 G-=17 'Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apaktme't ' Project On 'Warner Avenue, at Orion Street Huntington each, California- We , the undersigned, being residents of the Ci' ty of Hun ti"nytori Beach, California ,e , ni.a , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construct�.on` of ' an 11 unit apartment project, as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning old•'ustments of the Cityof Huntin ton .Beach , ' bei.n� Use -Pe. .g � � 9 � i t 'Wo. 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Hunt'in`gton Beach, California : DATED : ( Add a s'.) . DAT.� (Rest enta' (Addr 'ss ) rill, DATED: `''1986 : av ..; • ,.�e►.�. -'J (Resident) lie A dress }, Ct PETITION In Support 'Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Pro , Co p truction of ar. 1l_Unit . Apartment, Pro j osed ect On', Warner Avenue at 'Orion Street Huntington Beach, California we e ' u , 9 g Y g ndars:. ned, being re5rdents df the' City of Huntin ton Beach`, "California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction', of an - 'nit apartment proaect, as unanimously approved by the Board, of Zoning Adjustments of the City of ; Huntington Beach, being Use -Permit t No. 66-17 , on- Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the Cit y of . Huntington; Beach, California: DATED: + 986 ),/�MesidenfY / (Address-) DATED: _19 8 6 : (Resident) ` DATED: '' 1986 : (Resident) APrress ) r - - � ; PETITION ,; u ort Of Use Peimit ' No. 86-17 . " Pro osec3 Construction t p of an 11--Unit"Apartment Project On . Warner Avenue at Orion Street c Huntington Beach, California We, the undersigned, being residents of the ' City of Huntington . Beach, Californiat do hereb o SUPPORT the r osed constructiont;of � p nt project , as unani•mou an 1 I-uni _ a r�rtme sly approved 'by'• the Board,.' of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit No. 86-17, o •n Warner Avenue at Orion Street, - in the City of :Huntington Beach, California : S DATED• •.;5 a 8 , 19 8 6 : (Resident) _ I (Address ) i `DATED : 1986_ $ � b •. i Resident) (Address ) Owl DATED: � (Reside t t, .. A re5s � t�. k PETITION In Support Of •Use Perm:tt .No. 86-17 Pro :. . • ' ,.; .,; p osed Construction of an 11=Unit A a tment P • P P ro ject On Warner Avenue at -OriOn Street ntington Beach, ' Ca1`ifornia We, the undersigned , be�.ng residents `o€ . the. City o€ Huntington Beach, California, do hereby SUPPORT•'the propose d construction "of, an 11 unit apartment project,, as unanim YaPproveousl y d b the Hoard of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being use. { r.. e Permit No . . 86-17, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huitington Beach, Californian , DATED: JA (Resident) ,. ddress ) DATED: 1986 : �---� (Resid� t dLo Jr ( Address ) r ` ' • DATED: nj~ --�r� .~' Sir 1986 : �� ��►1 �, (Resident) (Address ) .�1.��=� a, 9iIQi j���l,T..lp,'�L7L.hi�. ` T.7.C:.MIr.H•f i•.TR7a� 'riTr r.i 1 ' `w• '� ,1 ) tVIC, ` PETITION In Support Of Use Perinit No . 86-1? Proposed Construction of an ''11M Unit- Apartment Project r,s , Ofi Warner Avenue at 0ri•an Street; Huntington Beach, California We', the undersigned $ being residents of the City of Huntington � r. Bea'h, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construct'ion 'of an 11-unit apartment project, as unanimously Approved by the. Board' of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit the �Cit n No. $6-17 , _ on Earner Avenue at Orion Street , in � •yof Hunti 3 gton Peach, California : DATED: '" i•-� , 19 8 6 : (Resident ) + (Address ) T 1986 : DATED : ` ' (Resident), s (� t? ` • (Add s )DATED: i ____� ....�.... ( Resident)'` r f , PETITION i r• In Support Of Use Permit -No. 86-11 Proposed Construction of an ` 11�Unit' APp artment, �Proj ect 4 , , On �W arner Avenue.• at or- ion Street Hunt31ngton Beach , California Wet the undersigned, being ' residen..s of the 'Cit .•. �- y `of Hunn tington s Beach, California, do h_reb proposed. , a y SUPPORT the construction of • '` an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board t Of Zonin Ad 'ustmpnts of the City of Hunting*on Bcach, being U 9 7 sE Permit r No . . 86-17, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City !of Huntington Beach, California : r DATED: f� ,>� J /� , 19 8 6 : (Resi ent ) 00 Coll ` e s (Address ) x (Resident) zi 16 ' ! (Address ) w , DATED: t e nt_k9 (Add@!is - - • - . F • 5 PETITION t%• i In Support 'Of Use Permit No. ' 86-17 Proposed Construction `of an I1_0nit Apartment Project . , .. On Warner Avenue at Orton Street Huntington Beach, California Wet. the un.:ersi ned, bean City' of Hun tin to residents of the n Beach, California, do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construct, ion' of an I1=-unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning 'Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being use Permit ; -No. 86--17 , on warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington J 'Beach', California : DATED: .r" , 19'9 6 : �#-'.-'sue.-�.--.-� . '•f , G� , oe (Resident ) i (ACdress ) ' DATEDs . (Resident) .(Address f . DATED- , 1986: e4w t) R • •j fi � �' � ' ,H 7 PETITION In Support Of Use Permit No 86-•17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment' Pro�ect on Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach, Carl iforn'is We the undersigned, beingresidents ''of the Cityof Huntington Beach`, California, do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction - of an 11--unit apartment project, as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit No. �,: , . 86-i17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the 'City 'of Huntington i Beach, California : L , 966 •D TED . � .--A ( Resident) (Address ) DATED : So '' �'�'� 1986;, etident) Ware" ) ,e DATED : - �,. ...� 1986, ✓ T Y" A ( es int) : Address( ) PETITION ,w r, In ,Support Of Use Permit No. '86-17 Pro`pose'd COnstriiction of 4:n 11-Unit Apartment ProieCt On -Warner Avenue at Oil'on Street Huntington, Beach California, ' We , 'the undersigned , being re3idents of -the City of Huntington r' Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the ro ' osed construction -of an 11-un .t a artme` r p nt project , as unanimously approved by t:he ' Board of- Zoning Adjustments of the City �of. Huntin gton Beach, ', be in Use ,Permit .. No . 86 17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion 'Street , in the 'a City of Huntington Beech, California: Al DATED: �� , 1986 : , (Rest, ent) (Address ) ,r DATED: 1986 : ( Resident ) (Ad ress) 1985: (Fees dent kA (Address ) F7 PETITION In Support Of Use ' Permit' No. 86-17 b , Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huritir gton Beach; Ci1'ifoirnia -We , the undersigned, being residents of the City 'o'f Hui ti'ngtgn Beach, ' California , do hereby SUPPORT the .proposed construction of 4:• n 11-unit a artme`.. ` p nt project, as unanimoualy` approved �by 'the Board Of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit ' ` No . 86-17, on Warner Avenue at 'Orion Street, a.n t he City of Hunkington Beach; California DAZED: .��Q,� � , 1986 : '! (Resident ) j t—� (Address ) , • DATED: 8 � , 1986: (Resident ) ArwV. try. (Address ) DATE •: � �,,,.,��," Resident) A dress • • .. .. ♦ � - _�t-_ L + .r• �\•A'��.M•I SrM L J jh r • ♦ Y.f rLJ► ♦ +j j � 1 Y �. ' •.' it r 1 -PETITION In Support Of' Use Permit No. 86-17 Proposed Construction •of an II Un3.t Apartment- Project . On W3rn:''-r• Avenue at •Orion Street HuntingtonBeach, ; California r We, the undersigned , being residents of the City_ of Huntington oposed constructi Beach, California, do hereby SUPPORT the "pron o by f an lI•-unit apartment project, as unanimously approved 'by the Board of Zoning Ad ustments of the City of Huntin ton Beac n ' g �• y g h,• being Use Permit No. 8,6-17, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the Ci ty of Huntington Beac1,, California DATED: 1986 • < .-( Res 'dent )4-4 ' 1 rr, (Address ), . DATED . 19., (Resident ) (Address ). I DATED: 2 , 1986 : �' •" e i nt) ®r- . • � A rep: .- _ ' , i ` 1 PETITION In Support Of' Use 'Permit No. '86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit' Apartment Project On:.:Warner``Avenue at Orion Street . ' Huntington Beach, California t: We , the Linde'rs ig ned, being residents c.f the City of Hunting tcn Beach, Californiat do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project, as unanimously 'approved by thzaBoard- of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit � j No. 66-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington . Beach, California: r`. DATED: 1986• r�t/ !1,`.. �-� 1 l (Resident ) / l (Addressl - DATED: ! 1986 : I1' I P ' - (Resident) (Addresm ) DATED: ,, 1986 :. . ti l Resident) t Ad reps . . «• J ' "•'• .� f' :',. •''. _ ter, «'♦ .�1' '1 A.t '!� `S.-�.. . PETITION In Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Pro..osed Construction of an 11 -Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach, California We, the undersigned$ being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11--unit apartment project, as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjuz trnents of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit ' No. 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the City of Huntington Beach, California : DATED: r �tv , 9 8 6 ..��.�. Re. ident ) 412 Z , I iAdd ess ) �Iuh- (�ac4, 01 DATED: 1986: t Resident ) (Address ), 1 r. , r ' DATED, , 1986 : ISO t r„ 5 ent) r r ; } - r r (Addteas � " a `P ?�'�.>�.� l ��''.Fl,r •'cy'• '4'Y t c •, {1- + - +. s a i�.�hH,t ys!at �'�r ::�.. IOWN PETITION In Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach , California We , the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach , being Use Permit No. 86--17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of HuntingtonBeach, California: • I DATED : '+j , 1986 : , (Resident ) j (Address ) i � r DATED: J � � 1986 : JPPL-4� 41t (Resident) (Address ) f DATED: rAl j (Rest ent) r t (Address)_ vi 11 w ("Nt� .-141-1 PETITION t In Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Froposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach, California We, the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Reach, being Use Permit No. 86-•17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the City of Huntington j Beach , California : DATED: ""'J 19 8 6: •.. (Resident (Addze.2s 9 8 6 : DATED . ��� - J 0 � . � esident (Address ) 30 DATED:' esiden nt.Ole 11, 4•ZI '� 1.., if :..' rl 2a. r t. FS•' .•.{,;yltl;G1',y µG.I , ,".\� M...f4K t. r"k !!` ` .YA` s rr ,j rtt 1 wALt.1:.i jy }ywt, 7 3 r r i ta- }r J ,■1 - ,. r . ,G1sFr, • i PETrr ..:_- In Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 ' Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Ht-.Atington Beach, California We, the undersigned, being residents of tt•e City of Huntington l Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit No. 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington I + Beach, California: DATED: 45 3 U �'�o , 19 8 6 : (Resident) j (Address ) DATED: 3d � 1986: -,;resident. ) 67 (Address ) DATED: W-Jo- , 1996 , ! (Reside ►t. --(A- Tess 'i 1 I f PE ITION In Support Of Use ' Permit No. 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenuo at Orion Street Huntington Beach , California We , the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the yroposed construction of an 11--unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the 'Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach , being Use Pdrmit d eAvenue a O ion Street in the City of Huntington N 8 - 7 on [� rn x t r 0 1 6 ► Y 4 i Beach, Califor a : r DATED : ,, 1986 : (Redden j -3F7 . !/ {A cYd r e st i, 1 DATED: , 1986 : •' (Resident ) idaie kf eel 40es (Address ) DATED: ► -:(�66: (Resident) a­4 41J GL • r ' Addr as ) PETITION In Support Of Use Permit. No . 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street 5 ree Huntington Beach, California We, the undersigned , being residents of the City of Huntington 9 9 Y 9 - . Beach, California , Flo hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously apprG/ed by the Board of zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit, No . 86--17, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington Beach, California : DATED: �"'" , 19 8 6: , (Resident ) �- i r i (Addy)6ss ) DATED: , _1986: (Resident ) (Address ) �I DATED: � �1986: (Residen p �' . Ad res3 _ a PETITION In StiP1)eirt Of Use Permit No. 86--17 Proposed Construction of an 11 - Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue a' Orion Street Huntington Beach, California We, the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby SUPPORT the proposed constru^tion of an li-unit apartment project, as l:nanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach , being Use Permit No. 86-1.7, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington Beach , Cal.iforn 'La : DATED: / k~ s L , 1986 : (Resident i l � 1 � (Address ) DATED: c130 44a . 1986 : (Address ) r DATED: 1986 : Re ident) \!^� Address a 6xrF ..a ti � 57,l , At'.r 4 t f ) "1A.�,. •1 F' �h ,�. -_ +...h4 � ,. 1,t �, r. ,. .. a_ �,. {f f "?C f 1 _. _ ... r'E, -.• _- twjE%1/s,. t�7-.'` ._. � _.��'�'�' __ � _.... / .M«..w,,.,. .-.� ,, a.• is- �� 77 PETITION in Support Of Use Permit No . 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Proiect On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach , California We , the undersigneO being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project, as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use -Permit No . 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the City of Huntington Beach, California : r DATED: , 1986 : - Resident ) ' ( A dress ) l DATED: 31/rep 19 8 6 : •..�.v / .�,;e�--�'e,- oz-'' J (Resident) ddress ) AT DATI D. U !l _.._. ,.w--�---- i Res indent) F�4 2 ress ;� -... .- .. .. I f AY.7.i. ��T+•.i Y.a,nNrti+•AMrwwY . PETITION In Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington. Beach, California We, the undersigned, being residents of '-he City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby' SUPPORT the proposed construction of I; p zo 'ect as unanimously approved b the Board 'ht an 11-unit apartmentp � � 1 PP Y of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach , be'Lr3 Use: Permit No. 86--17, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington Bach, California : P' r DATED: S - s�G+ - , 1986 : �.- `-' ( Resident) (Addrertis DATED: 3 s,_19 8 6 : .rc (Resident) (Address ol DATED. JC" ( R en17 t , . : Tess •� .;'. t PETITIIN 4 � . 1 I In Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Propnsed Construction of w, 11`-Unit Apartment Proiect � On Warner Avenue at \'Oric_1 Street f Huntington Beach, ,,Ca'-iifornia We , he undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington leach ; California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of G an 11-unit apartment, project , as unanimously Approved by the Board P ' of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit No . 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion St:►:eet, in the City of Hur.,tington i' Beach, California : / 1 % DATED: , - - r-- ( Resident) (Address ) Of 4 �� DINED: -� 1986 ( esident ) i s 1 1 1 ' DATED: ,-,,...,--..- ".�...'' Masi d�ent) , J , c A cess t 1 PETITION In Support Of Use Permit No. 66--17 Proposer' Construc:tioa of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Hunti,i•gton Beach, Californi& We , the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do h.e,.eby SUPPORT the proposed coiistruction of an 11--unit apartment project, as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach# being Use Permi No. 86-17 , vn Werner Avenue at Orion Street , An the City of Huntington Beach, California : DATED : ( Resident ) ..3 9 3 L• 4 1/L l�J.t ,per :�i��t�. c�� � �t'ti ... N (Address ) y� • ,rp DATED: ..� �'� : _I9b6: ( . dent ) "AdAr-opsp r'f � y� DATED. `,.� ' , 1966: u� .�::. '�a.►.._ �r (Resident) �► (Address) r�, ,o • t 1 2n Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 PT.oposed Construction oz Kn 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Reach, California We , the undersignpL: . being residents of the City of Hun':ington Reach, California., do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of 5 an ll- ' ,.r. apartment project , as unanlrnously approved by the Board i of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit No. . 86-17, on Earner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington ` Beach, Ca 1 ._ornia : i DATED: F (Resident ) j �-�a ,04 (Address ) i DATED: ,`J -� � -�L t 1, 9 8 6 : tKesiide t! tip: I6 L 91 r DATED: ,� .� , .1986 (Resident°), (A resv ALQL Publish June 26 , 1986 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HPUMC APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF USE PERMIT NO 86-17 ,ANO NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO 86-18 NOTICE IS HERBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington peach Civic Center, 2000 Hain Street, auntiagtao Beach, Callforn1a, on the date and at the time indicated below to recewve and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: Monday, July 7, 1986 TIME: 7:30 P.M. 01LICATiON IWMI-M: Appeal to Planning Commission 's denial of Use Permit No. 86.17/ Negative Declaration No. 86-18 ` LOCATION: northeast corner of Orion Avenue and Marina View Place Pfc4POSAL: An appeal filed by Councilman Don MacAllister to the Planning Commission 's denial of Use Permit No. 86-17 which is a proposed eleven-unit apartment project. The appeal is based on an objection to the findings of fa'ct supporting the Planning Commission's denial because the existing zoning on the land has been in existence for .11 years . EgYIRoxmEsTAL STATUS: The proposed project is covered by Negative Declaration No. 86-18 ON FILE: A copy of Use Permit No. 86-17 and Negative Declaration No. 86-18 is on file in the Office of Development Services . ALL L=UESTED PU(SoNS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as ,outlined above. All applications, exh'.bits, and desceiptions of this propesal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Hain Streit, Huntington .Beach, Cnl fornia , for inspection by the public. HUN'TINGMN BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: t+licia H. Wentworth CLty Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Ua tad: old' a 24,' 1986 E-: J r„ Ask i NOTIC£ TO CLERK TO 5CIIEOULE PUBLIC NEARING ITEM � -�'"`1 AKA PA&i , a^► S d { _.._ , TO: CITY CLERK' S OFFICE Or 1*7 j j- l� DATE: (t• • tea" FRO14: PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE DAY OF � l� _ � 198(. AP 's will follow No AP ' s Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition , * Appeal ✓ Other Adoption of Environmental Status ON Has City Attorney's Office been NO informed of forthcoming public hearing? o '� �(�,.,..,• Planning Department - Extension Ref Er to �•C•-- dw� _ _ for additional information. I . * If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . i a - Ole .' -• Pub ati. ' .. NOTICE OF PUBLIC IMAJ INc • NOTICE IS HEREBY LIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the 'Huntington .Beach Civic ' Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the 'date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the ctatenents of all , persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: fir ' jvtij - q 6 ' ` TIME.: P 1 APPLICATION NUMBER: �S.P �a 'P�LtM ��i�,�w► S ��J4,t�.�t,�' � . C�t�s� rP�-rte.t..� �• ��r �7/ N�l�fj�� 'h�L�%/�-`a''�iaJ � !' LOCATION: PROPOSAL: 1 -cited CrAomlm--w 'A ih-� r - ! +r EN NHENTAI. STATUS[- �1r eTr '' 'mod ON PILE: ' +-��� •ply,'--��"-�= ti-C� �'U� � '1 , ALL INTERESTED PERSOINS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTOV. BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536--5405 , Ash C , First Americana Title Insurahce Company. 114 EAST FIFTH STREET, (P. O. BOX 267)5ANTA ANA•CALIFORNIA 92702• (714) 658.3211 Affidavit on Proms Ownership List i I ahe Attached List represents the Names and Addresses of all Property rs 1or ted within 300 feet of the Exterior Boundaries of Property awne I located at Parcel Map 85-239 as obtained ran a atest Orange county Assesment Fb_ s. `i f � (Sicnature) Christopher J. Fnuly Assistant Secretary Director of special Services First Awrican Title Insurance Co-. 11.4 E. Fifth Street 1 Santa Ana, Chi 92702 (714) 558-3211. , 24 it r i MILD AMEi - l rRcC., TRACl M V 1pAfRACrsr .♦ p .+t rr�• . I t h t. Al i _. l ~i stLt� ! t 8 - s O 26 2 23 � ... r . 1. - t-. J•!' 1 • - --I IG al- !3 ' BLK /� rssac -d 7 � � it• • xtnt ;to tDr s tar d 12 •s1Cl 253 T;, 4 is O LO►J tar 4 NV Td0/4. x d•tK 7 • :r� n N a. 9 � Ot• ,esat tt "'Ur .. TRACT !« - 410 86Or I « TRACT -- --- M G/►tt t� tar♦ 9 In ►os�.c t St t 6 tone f IM AC. s t .r n r. •• • _ s uj NO 11532 NO. 86 23 for*♦, ER �I c r WARN r i ts3-30 ' t JELORElf . ��s -• _ 't;�t.e t ..�= (\�✓I] •� 'r, t _� `, � ..,. . ; .-� r-� .Viz, } a,� •• Y;... - .�,.r�u f h � tS)) �.� ...r..� r•1 t i . 1 Lr, �: ♦ h � 13 s y.f. M..rr L l� ♦ "� :. - - ��..y�..-�,� i . Iih'j ,.'. 4�r+ t Tf . k �•,L,.,i•j'�VjT+ i '~ 28 aigloo . k . � MARINA �•%Ely FLACE� _ - at-ac wowq sr! CIRCL£ +�,. eta 11% MN ., ',Q,p- , • _ •. TRA '� _ --. w Mai _ - NE•R r,�r r,. .4 se _ 09 10 T n 21 Q zv U rs 174AC"" !e •`" ,r- /O (D i9 /s • ; , Q b14 sw N �M» s . ,• �«a►� I.. i 26 ZT • pro.. 'o• 5633. n 7745 / MO a COL/RTrdEY 3'''� ��� �_ M ss t •` ^ �ss� r« u �'. SJ 9 �` Z, 14 ' � •f OP N7-RAC r ' 49 E t l � se r.• '� .•i N41 •cs r w 1S _ 'T'r. s 0 02 ! Ok ate• o' C2• /!M r 1) 12 '• 13 l •_ • ~ LOWE �.! LL CIRCLE a.; 2 3 is a two 4880 1� O �v11`LION• •Ir:ri • ..i>r• Nl••c,• �f ' �� + s�.cs TRttC ® p,,�ar DRIVE •,'1 -a , ! jo !NO 4 n� fil • /:, ,.a• 4 �. �• �� �- II�.Z556T SAXWOMC UNE s / % \:J. c 29 ''• "'v' J8 z� _ I i i .�• . . ' - . . . - :cam' . - .' r :I ;,• if +a. ••,y j - LOGEWArfRiv :3 rl rrQRCN 197/ t i„r; j ► '� ~} ,' t swf?33 Q .• 'i 1 7 ` ��y{,+�y.�7.T T. � '{✓ - ....[Y�jir, �...;. .:1::1. .., -:� :-s S «e r•l �•° • ,t. I +_ �•� •� •�6'l•~ f ';2•t ,' � . •/w ktx' �S�•.1-•�2••i9��'� �+�� ./�,Ti"�•F, r•• :/�{*,,T.��' 'L�!,�jt1' ��Z �•' �Y�;T,•lf?i�►Y'�+•N��t�C•Z t'��.�'�•"'�1'SI�.; r• f� / + 100 163-30TI + it C SIMs srnfET v n it _ T ACT � TA AcT • � 2: 3 •• S i t 6 i 24 ?S 8 C.) l i 20 tf (� 2+ 2� IB IT t9 •' a 4 � t � . . ... O f Z .'. .ell[r tttLLcY r! 11 /J u � 7 Ip •fir , s r' z 00, �S� (91 c) -C 2• (0 03 + '".'�•• _ { SA/YGRf• LEE te 5Mcer •n d • V )%3 NO 6U or of 4 71 t SO• IilO" i0' . i.0- •• " t• rill/ll .r • C26 V is V tr a = ZO "%; D. a9 i d0. 475 c•' 3 L •� A�rE,1, P r`CR to►r 2 o vE MARINA VICIY PLACE ralt&V ,w Sri CIRCLE , 178 MARCH 1951 ASSESSOR'S .MAP 60000 PAGE G 2 COUNrr Of ORANGE RhO Anwrican rtk Insurance Company- j i?4 EA3T FIFTH STREET • SANTA ANA.CALIFOWA 92701-4699 FIRST CLASS _ FROM 1�11r� j `�.. r st American tie Insurance Compan, z: t 114 EAST FIFTH STREET • P.O.BOX 26 � SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92702 0 . _ r TO Bra, :mot. to UAL, f RETURN POSTAGE GUARANTEED �r FORM 20,04 , . . «.:... rtrs 4'wt44,W.qr,..:..i.._..,i-'.., 1+�.ti.�w-�+.• 4 John E. Lea rv ,} 9 Craig E. hsenlrarg17150 Cburtney L�at�e (j, ;; 17171 marina View Pla ".�ily 1ninLirrta^ Tle� , Cl c1� , 92649 , Huntington 13ench, CA 92649 1"38-284-06 . 178-285-05 i t R16mld E. Stiles Bill Wilson ' 17021 Malta Circle � 16961 'Bolero Lane , Ituntingten saachp CA 92649 r Huntington Qeach, CA 92649 178-284--21 1 Peter; W. &-%mcmkos 17031 Malta Circle Huntington Beath, CA 92649 178-284-22 Paula R. F1illner j 17041 Malta Circle FAtntington Beach, CA 92649 ' 178-284-23 i Ronald C. Winger < 17051 Malta Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 170-284-24 ' Jac3: 0. Ieverenz 17071 MIta Circle MmUr6ton Beach, CA 92649 ' 178-265-,25 y , R. C. Crooks 7' 17101 Malta Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 ' 178r-284-26 { Sidney B. t le man 17102 Oeurtney Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 , 178-264-27 Robert J. Lujan 17092 Courtney Huntington Beach, CA 92649 ' 118-284-28 Jeffrey A. Stattan 17072 mwtaLamy La � t ltuntin Cgwn Bich, cA 92649 178-284-29 r r , Rb rxd E. 11.1bx-q fS 17052 Courtmy Lute ikz j9.ngtcu i Deacll, CA 92649 , 178--1184-30 ts., i;=° t. t i t t t •r i7 " f , 1 " `h i r ,i .Anthony P. Francois i Luigi. Volta Art M. brio 2040 Pebble Beach, Dive 17122 Sandra Lee Laen 17122 Farina View Pl Palm Sprirufs, CA 92264 Huntingtai fvach, CA 92649 ftunt•.ington leach, CA 9264° 110-021-09 110-022-16 110-024-22 ' v . Aonal,d W. Jolu� Glen HSha;r an + � Art trario 17092 Sandra lee Lane j P.O. Box 1972 i 17122 Marina View Pl I1unUngton Beach, CA 92649 `` Huntington Beach, CA 92649 + Ihuitir gton Beich, CA 92649 110-021-10 j 110-023-07 110-024-23 I 1l, i Virginia Helen Cronkite Ifaro ld P. Jotmson Joseph L. Glenn 17062 Sandra lee Lane .1176 Alain St. � 17141 Sandra. LAe Lane f Huntington Bch, CA 92649 Irvine, CA 92714 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 `` 110-021-12 f 110-023-08 110-024-24 RalphT. Clark ; Dino Vlac)x,)s � Charles P. ftaber 10407 Western Ave. 1 17911 Sharnley Circle ; 17161 Sandra LA Aaoney, CA 90241 ; I11Mtingtc11 Mach, CA 92649 1 Huntington Leach, CA 92649,. 110-021-13 ` 110-023-09 1 110-024-25 ` Ralph T. Clark ! Gordon 5aciofski ? I1arbcur View Associates 10407 Western Ave. 2030 Pangeview Drive f 6363 Sunset Blvd. Cowney, CA 90241 Glendale, CA 91201 Ins Mgeles, CA 90028 110-021-14 110-023-10 t 110-026-01 c Mary Cochrane Fred Jacobson i City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 1117 400 Abntecito it]. P.O. Box 190 Yorba Linda, CA 92686 Seal leach, CA 90740 "I Huntington Beach, CA 92648 110-021.-15 110-023-23 ! 110-026-02003 i i Joseph A. Do. l or=di Den Onodrra Pelican Cove 1kn emners 995 Caluveras n rive ! New CM x 808 Adams Ave. 1-10-023-24 Camarillo, CA 93010 IunUngton Beach, CA 92648 1110-021-18 .r -lf 178-252-23 c � Arnold A. Angelici { Peter M. Clark ltarold P. Lynn 21902 Starfire Laney 17121 Sandra Lee Lane 17122 Courtney Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92645 ; Huntington Peach, CA 92469 ttuntingtxi Beach, CA 92649 110-021--19 110-024-01 178-284-02 George Iranmwd Irrc. Donald n. walter Anthony Ivicevic 16033 Dolsa Chica 4103 ! 17131 Satxlra Lea Zane 17130 Courtney livie Itunt3zudtcm Beach, CA 92649 Iuntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington l5each, CA 92649 1110-021-23 1.10-024-02 178-284-03 Jolui P. Olson John R. 1-kstacneyer Robert P. Heasley 17142 Sandra Lee Iane 17162 &ir na View Pi 17136 Courtney;lane Y,wjtlaujton Beach, cA 92649 ftmUngton Beadi, CA 92649 Ifunt:ington Beach, CA 92649" 11.0-022-14 110-024-13 178-284-04 :jhojun Yukawa Abraham b1aa2 1S�ritenclersm Family flcurise [inter .17132 Sandra .tee Zara View Laces P.O. Box 2278 :. , IfUntirxltMj Coach, CA 92649' lfiuntangtC ) LMrh, CA 92644 W-otclair, CA 92763 1Q-022-15 110-024-1 1784284-05 0 CONNOR -Wallin# Addres;: P•O.Box 4450/Long 9satfi, CalNornk f080+ 2889 Myrtle Atta./Signtl Hill, Galilornla 90806/(213) 42"135 'Agri 1 28, 1986 dry. a Glen Godfrey < Board of� Z or.ing Adjustments �• City of Huntington Reach �• Box 190-92648 Dear Sir: , a' This letter is .to express my, ftinily 5 opinion against. any adjustment in the zoning of the pr.oporty, involved in use peTmit 086- 17 . Recent years have brought a tremendous traffic increase to ., the intersection 1 or "curve" of Farina Visw, and Orion . Many cars traveling at relatively fast speeds up Vs�rner, aaka "race course" type right turn on Los Patos and ,•then :a similar "race course!' type fast left on Marina View. Even without those shenanigans , the intersection`' at Orion and Marina View is for some reason conducive to encouraging;I'Arivers to drift over the double line that the - city recently (within the last two or three years) painted there. Normal, no-a-speediine drivers drift over the line because of the configuratit+n of : that Intersection -and at the -present tizo, there is NEVER `a •car parked w intersection .anywhere near the ante sect n . l If there is an entrance or egress put vithin 100 feet of that ! curve , it will be probably the most dangerous intersection in Huntington beaeh. within 48 hours of the first tenants arrival . I For your further consideration, this is a ,.singl'e family neighbor- ; Admittedly, there ,ore some ti � head . t y, ar Sul unit buildings nearby but if you make an on-site inspection, I think you' ll agree .;this is not a neighborhood that would be wall - served by an 11-tinit apart- sent . t I am not sure but I„believe the lot was changed from a single lot to two lots within thG last few years . In the 13 years I 've lived in the neighborhood, there h ve. bien at l ear 3 multiunit projects turned down. More' umal liar than »hats being requested now. �1 � Y S0, of 'those ro acts were .turns.. ;down when there were only S or : 6 homes 1.7.t,the neighborhood . Now the, neigh�b,_,':ood is filled and to grant this 'permit would not be in , the city- 5 best interest or the citizens of the! neighborhood . As a- faot note I might add that I found out about this ro act from other concerned neighbors . I was 'a1ot advised by the appli- cant and I live within S00 feet of the proposed complex . 5�incer•� ]y,' William Halpin W11 s ieg 'cc%Robert, Franklin, Dept, of Dev'c'lopment Services. -' i iAll 04 ' July 2, 1966 . R'EC E I W 6 The Honorable Robert Mandic nLD✓ Mayor JUL S 06 City of Huntington Beach Huntington MainBeach CA C"OFHURTIbIGTON BEACH , MY COUNCIL OFFICE Dear Mayor Mandic : The members of Sunset Heights Neighborhood Committee wish to state our objection to the appeal to the Planning commission ' s denial of use Permit 86-17 and Negative Declaration No. 86-18. :} ii ;i We strongly support the Planning Commission ' s ruling that the property development be restricted to six units consisting of 18 bedrooms no more than two stories in height . { Our presentation to the Planning Commission primarily concerned t the two major issues that were identifed by the Commission in that this project would be detr{mental to : , a ) the general welfare of persons residing or wicking in the vicinity and , b) injurious to property and improvementF in the vicinity of such use or buildings . The Sunset Heights Neighborhood has developed over the last 15 years into one of the premier residence areas in Huntington Beach with homes selling in excess of half a million dollars . The present single family homes form a stable family oriented neighborhood of people who built with the empecki O. ons of long term residence and a steady gr%;wth in the value , .•;. their Investment . To express their concern , in late ..�r�l , 44 residents who live in 3anset Heights and who would be direct'y effected signed a petit,ikn putting forth' their objections to the proposed 11 unit project and the negative impact it would have on the existing R-1 neighborhood . There is presently R-2 housing along Sandra Lee which share a common property line with this development . Of the five lots which encompass approximately one net acre there are two single family dwellings and three multi-living dwellings, with -a to�:al i of 11 units . This project seeks to build that sane number on half this net acreage . In conclusion, we ask that, you' keep in mind the preseir.t Sunset Heights areas as a neighborhood that has .evolved. beyond. whit might have been in the minds of the original-- pl.ijiners who; se't: the zoning designations when Warner was not an'.s�::terial highway, but a street called Winteraberg . appiecl Pet ate your careful consideration of *.his matter. lar : ! Sunset `Hei hts Neighborhood "Committee 9 g - ;, � was., - ..-•:..+.-e F.,�Cana-_i`y,�ao�... .a ,.. ...I Mk a OAGESS CO.9 REALTORS` Since IW4 CosixtrimiALA-aWStIUAL PWPtA't1= *Mt'i LONG 29ACH'SONLNVAxa Sr zs Amn L.>Asn LAND 9RACH. CAUPORNIA 001107 'At#1•i40ti tbo NatkaJ Aaockilm al Rawl titan Uwdt CaIlhvr4a Rogl Esltle Airade im CrnQ ids Awd o1 NW119n May 3t. , 1` 80'5 r�~ Ct�y'r►.�' I� Willium Halpin 171J2 Marina View Huntington Duach, Ca . 92641 Dear Mr. R31pir,. Re; Effect of rental aptt3, on Marina View property ' It is my opinion and that of my compony, that rental unite, such as an apartment building, will adverse.'y affect. the property values of surrounding or nearby R-1 property. The downside decrease in value will ultimately be decided ! , by the value of the nearby property at the titne of construction of the apartment units as well as the value in later years when the impact of the rental units may be greater . R In a neighborhood of $350, 000 to $600, 000 homes I would ! estimate the value reduction between 10% ,and 30%. I think 10% would .be a minimum impact, if the 'units tretl,ta7) were discriminating and luxury units . Anything less' %,fould, in effect, reduce the value of the nearby homes more and as the rental units begin to deteriorate, naturally the impact would be greater. We have found that apartments are more "enhanced" b.�,'= nearby R-1 property than vice-versa . sincerely, or wwo ,lnwt"ho n yM wicks/it Clark eurgeas Co. , Realtors _ l F _ T April 30s 1986 ' TO Hoard of Zoning Adjustments City of Huntington Beach, Ca. r FROM: Ann Convay 17172 Purina Vitt Place Huntingtou Daubs Ca.* 92649 ' Tel. (7245 840/7523 r•r. construction ofYa multi-unit rentadevpmen , in I hereby state my strop opposition . elopment in an area surrounded by a custom-developed R-1 residential community of owners, not renters. .Since ,1972, Land wy fellow neighbors havre ..struggled with short-sighted developers to maintain a homogeneous profile in th1m area - one of which the City has come to be very proud. Despite the fact that zoning .made years Sind yiears ago may permit the consideration of a multi-residential rental Drojoct, its impact on the neighborhood both from traffic congestion aspect and esthetically would have negative repercussions. , It would be & .mistake to allow the construction of s rental property in an area where long-term residents hav0 bailt lifetime homes �*ith pride and caring. - r , , AEC Of Ile zi Aor�fit fit Aoc -� r r O, , AJ Me _:nz -40 i _.. . . --. - nwa .. s .�.._... Y' e i ti: mow• y�i Peter 1M.Cla-rk Aptil 75, :19F�6 Mr . G1en K:; Godfrey, Sacr�etary Board of Zoning h4justmQnts o p. . . 196--91645 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dvar Mr . Godfrey: In ragard to- the hearing scheduled for "Wednesday, ►pri1, 10, .1986 for Petition/Goac:iaent: . Use pe'roit No . 86 37 Negative Declaration No. 86-18, Applicant, William H. Wilson prop�ex',?y- r :riving across the street from Asa owner • ro osgd, development, we ..Wish to register our P P . strong',opposition of your approval of this project . The,.tie ighborhood 'presently has I, an abundarine .of apartment complexes which, unfortuna,tely, add greatly eo the parking and traffic congestion on Sandra Lee and Orion. No matter how many garage units seem to be legislated, there are always more te)lant cars than space. We, question 'the ' advisability. of the proposed ' alley and ° the dangers it will create. We . have a daily example of these safety pi-oblems with the alley on Orion just east of Sandra Lee . The addition of mare R-24,;hou$`ing into an . area that has become a lu'lly deveXoped RM1 neighborhood is p4izl4i g,', ; The feeling ` and .texture of tho ', j no14hborhood,;,ha`sI diffIcul_` ei s; now mixing with the more transient , apartment ' population and more units will just contribute to these pressures. It seems environental impact studies ere ,.requi red Nor major undertakings, however , Your, office, indicated that this is a 4amall project" and, theref're , notification of the entire_ neighborhood aas: not made . To the city of Huntington Reach this may, not be an Important matter* to our neighbors And aurselves, it . Unfortun,. . ately, , your notificetion, .came only a week g and we will, not be able to attend to express our. concerni in Person. Sincorify. :Peter andDonna dark I t e� t , J ;(fa!'. ,.. .. •+ts.••s•tr!'E^. cy+at','.i•:r,1a.f.-,t o J ............. . . �. ._-_,. _.�_, ' • dFi.i,a ., ,.,li. .. ,tF;�1li �, •,J --- - -- - t - 1 -OUR HOMES ' , ss 7 5 lV „, �NTS ��i��.. r 511+pG�'1�NS r P(IOKRN MINAa" i TP41 DfEIIS June 3, 1986 s Mr. Torn Livingood Chairman, Planning Commission ' City of Huntington Beach ! 2000 Main Street ; Huntington 2 2arh, Ca. 92647 Re: Sunset Heights Neighborhood • i Dear Mr. Livinguod: ' At the request of the Sunset Heights Neighborhood..Co'"ittee I am._presentI ing my opinion to you on -the affect of :partment: dwellings ,in single family owner occupied neighbourhoods, My real e;,tate experience has been in investment and resider'Ltial'Teal -estate since 1976 and commercial real estate since 19619. —.c4ri6nt1y,1um"the oyner- broker of Harbour Homes b Investments in Huntington Harbour; It is my apinres that encen, cenetaller"adverael�. uf�tC� ,sumh. , valueoyhood as H b dingle fami y id .s..8 Y Y c r's. . a of; the homes. As in rule apartment dwellers do not display the price of ownership as do the owners of single family homes, thus resulting' in. overcrovideci apartments,' congested parkinf; and high traffit.`.on side sr.reats.'', '..`1-`found `•. this to be the - rule is'most of the Ceogrephic arass. that I ha« beea`a^e90- .sated throughout the Unite,i 'a"tattGj. , Sincerely, ;. K Dean Zit ica President: k ►fvvKX R WILL s`'6675 FAcA 4ow 3rwat • wmrtioioN WWR ULK.VM qQl O M (714)$40,103'. r ' 15- VS 8 6OZ ,ty . �J - ,` Aulh0#1190 10 PuDnsn AdverheamenU ornds IncluQ pubhc nol�c�s by Decrse 01,1ne superior Court lot orangeu�p ounty, CS1+101me. Number A-6214. 44140 29 56plembe+. 1961, and 1June, 1 ]A t t led 1 96 � as as STATC OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange 0.0% hot.. bam"•0-V ca.-Wed ec .w .+.ar+ .r W ► oe.0 i i I am a Citizen of the United States and a resirent of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter ; am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general clrculaaflon, panted and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange. State of California. and that a Notice of PUBLIC .I1EARrNG of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, was panted and published in the Costa Mesa, KotfrCWO&Ot r Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, ; L 'c9111111110towh ,xa! Irvine, the South Coast communities and La •una ` "i .—AWT f 9 �*..rawt�t;Ie,rr ;.+.. Boach issues of said newspaper for ONE TIME 1 �_ NOT► -9 ,19 t""toy consecutive weeks to w11 the issue(s) off I :?f king 3 t'for"s' June 26 198 6 teat C411 fenIKAM; thhi&W!e and 0.ttyWS•ft M.: pefgWiCLAW e�1 pr Wa t�a w1w,V*h to to "heard ioa"ri to N detilMM CSISd1 L,JIL" ~ � DAT! Moeatry. JWV;7,(198 i Ule:l'M�►nMl r Nq: f>(z'Y11/ ;aA>r1"�f�A r1CN �w i to W tomb o.N�. ��l11t�111EZkF � . 198 m+ y i«iwr . rer` son 4rMJ> oso s f sit A� t• zit t oc rlax :-N W11*Asi 198 ; al'A bra ' t ► ie j Yy t� ; A�IM �IWl6ef'�011M.�jMrfllh/i ;it 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the a.,r «k foregoing is true and correct. an a" 'OMB dl4l'0 lot'te�M , aeialu:ir'the' � Executed on June 26 tw•wn, . -at- sta Mesa, C Illornia. �xi►t� "> .wm era L Rvi. } (µ ([ 7J �" JC LA •Signature PROOF OP PUSLICAMN ,s REQU -i FOR CITY C0.UNC00AbTI0N Date July 7, 1986 Submitted to; Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson , City Administratorew. Prepared by: James W. Palin , Director, Development Services r: Subject: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OF PERMIT NO. 86-17/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-18 Consistent with Council Policy? N Yes t 1 New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Fundin8 Source,Alternative Actions, Attachment-q: r STATEMENT OF ISSUES: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Councilman MacAllister to the Planning Commission ' s denial of Use Permit No. 86-17/Negative Declar,a�-ion No . 86--18 which is a proposed eleven-unit apartment project locoed at the northeast corner of Orion Avenue and Mar in3 View Place. The appeal is based on an objection to the findings of fast supporting the Planning Commission denial because the existing zoning en the land has been in existence 21 years . RECOMMENDATION: Board PF zoning Adjustments ' action and recommendation: ON MOTION BY EVANS AND SECOND BY S14ITH, THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS APPROVED USE PERMIT NO. 86-17 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86--18 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Evans , Godfrey, Krejci , Poe , Smith NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN : None Planning Commission action and recommendation ; ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY PORTER, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OVERTURNED THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS' APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT 86-17/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-18 AND DENIED THE PROJECT BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood, Porter , MirJahangir NOES: Erskine ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None rlo•/rA FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed _eleven (11 ) unit apartment project will be detrimental to: a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b . Property and improvements in the vicinity ,of such use or building. ., 1 2 . The proposed structures will be injurious to existing properties and improvements in the area because : a . The number of units the applicant is requesting is the maximum number allowed in the R2 zone and development to such maximum would cause extreme traffic and safety impacts . b. There is an unusual mix of zoning and density in the area and the density requested by the applicant would be incompatible with existing development . 3. The proposes' eleven unit apartment project will create undue traffic hazards to the area because there is no direct access off an arterial highway (Wainer Averfue ) and ingress and egress to the adjoining site will cause additional traffic, impacts and safety problems to Orion Avenue, Marina View Place and Sandra Lee Lane d . The Commission indicated to the applicant that a project compatible with the area would contain six units (4-wo units per lot) , eighteen bedrooms , and li ►ited to two stories. Staff Recommendation : Overturn the Planning Commission' s denial and uphold the Board of Zoning Adjustments ' approval of Use Permit No . 86-17/Negative Declaration Uo . 86--18 based on the following findings and conditions of approval . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1 . The establishment , maintenance and operation of the proposed eleven (11 ) unit apartment project will not be detrimental to : II e or working in the welfare of persons residing g a . The • eneral e p 9 3 vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect ',Lhe General Pan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3.. The" project is consistent with the City 's General Plan of Land Use • :RCA -- Julyi., (05241n) • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The site plan , floor plans and elevations dated June 25, 1986 , shall be the approved layout. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit the following plans : a . Prior to the issuance of building permits , the applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the Departments of, Development Services and Public Works for review and approval . Said landscape plan shall indicate the exact type and material of block wall to be installed and shall be subject to approval of the Landscape Division of the Public Works Department, Department of Development Services 'j and the Fire Department . b . Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan. Said plan shall indicate 'f screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment and shall ! delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment . i 3 . the development shall comply with all applicable p.ovisions of the Ordinance Code , Building Division , and F..re Department 4 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prAlor to occupancy of units . 5. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the local-ions of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units . Gas, water, and elect.:ical outlets shall be provided at all ground level patios . 6. Low-volume heads shall be used on all. spigots and water faucets. i 7 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 8 . The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached, shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property . The interior noise levels of all dwelling units shall not exceed the California insulation standards of 45 dba CNEL. Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report, prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application, for building permit (s ) . 9„ if foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant 'type shall be installed an approved by the Building Division. .ti KCA. duly '.7 , 1986 -3� t�D52kD�. . . WF 10. Lot Nos. lr 2 and 3 shall enter into an irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement . The existing 20 Foot easement shall be expanded to coincide with the 25 foot driveway and 8 fool,; parallel parking areas . 11 . All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits . 12 . The applicant shall install and 17-2intain landscaping in the City right-of-way at the intersection of Orion Avenue and Marian View Place per the require:^ents of the Department of Public Works . 13 . Application for all new real estate developments and structures for human occupancy within Special Study Zones shell be accompanied by a geologic report g � registered in the �;t P Prepared by a geologist 9 ate of California , and directed to the problem of potential surface fault displacement through the site . 14 . The City Council reserves the right to revoke this Conditional Use Permit if any violation of there conditions or the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code occurs . ANALYSIS: On May 7, 1986 , the Board of Zoning Adjustments approved Use Permit i 86-17/Negative Declaration 86- 18 which is a proposed eleven-unit apartment project by a vote of 5 to 0. The request is for an eleven-unit project which would result in two fourplexes and a triplex ;• eac h ch on a separate parcel .l . The P project was appealed ' PC to chi, Planning Commission by the Sunset Heights Neighborhood Committee based on their asse.7tion that the proposed eleven-unit project will, create potential traffic and parking impacts ; will not be compatible with the area ; and the fact that the proposed project is apartments rather than condominiums or single family dwellings . On June 17, M6, the Planning Commission overturned the Board of zoning Adjt,Stments ' approval and denied the project . At both the Board of Zoning Adjustments ' level and at the Planning Commission level , the Traffic Engineering section of the Department of public Works has maintained that the proposed eleven unit Apartment project will not create excessive traffic and safety impacts . In addition , the proposed project is designed to meet the development previsions in the R21 Medium Density Residential District . A matrix which confirms the conformance with the Huntington Beach Ordinance code is provided and is included in the attachments at the end of this report . Another issue that needs to be addressed is the matter of whether the ', , prcposed eleven-unit apartment: project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan designation for- the site is medium density residential which permits from up to 15 units per aross Iacre . The subject site is 1 . 02 gross acros which in germs of the maximum number of units allowed in accord with the General Plan, a 1.5 unit .apart:men t RCA July 7', 1986 _4r ��._ .. 1i r} {,T;:...Ct.9`_alt'.'7S_•°C'�li:,.F.._rr':5,i�i..++-.+..•_ __ ...r'.- __. _ .... ... �—.. _--. _ — _.-..�..,,.... —_. __—_. � ___ . , project would be consistent . The applicant has proposed an eleven-unit apartment project which reflects a decrease of four units from the maximum allowed by the General Plan . The maximum density allowed in Low Density Residential is seven units per gross acre . Taking this into consideration, it becomes apparent that the eleven-unit proponal is the middle ground between the maximum allowed in Medium Density Residential ( 15 units/ga ) and the maximum allowed in Low Density Residential (7 untts/ga ) . Staff maintains that the project is consistent with the General_ plan and will not create traffic or parking impacts . The following is a matrix illustrating the density determination according to R2 standards and according to apartment standards : Artic;.e 03,2 Article 916 - R2 Apartment ," tandards Medium Density Residential (Hypothe•tical if ( Applicant ' s Request ) developed as 1 Parcel ) Denci ty: 1 unit per 2000 sq . f t . 1 unit per 3000 sq.ft. net lat area (after gross lot area ( include street dedication ) to centerline of street) Parcel : No . 1 No : 2 No . 3 No. 1 Lot Area (square feet ) : 6,. B03 81207 81. 124 441300 Number of Units/Lot : 3 4 4 = 11 total 14 total In con.%fusion, staff would add some supplemental information regardit.g the existing density of units in the area and also informatiot► regarding existing building heights in the imtnediat-e vicinity of the proposed project . Adjacent to the subject site, the existing number of units totals eleven on a 1 . 13 acre site . If the existing residential :tLock shoulT ycle , the potential number of units could increase to eighteen under the R21 Medlum Density Residential District development standards. A survey of existing single family dwellings and apartments in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project revealed that the majority of the structures range in height from 25' to 301 . Staff determined that 16 single' family homes range in height from 25 ' to 30 ' which demonstrates that the proposed 30 ' height for the project will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : This project is covered by Negative Declaration No. 86--18. FUNDY::G SOURCE: Not` applicable . v RCA July 7 , A986 5- . (0520 ) .,, ` e vrl ALTERNATIVE ACTION fl: Should the City Council decide that the proposed project is too intense for the site, they may choose Lo determine a more j appropriate number of units . The applicant has previously stated that he could possibly consider 9 to 10 units . ALTERNATIVE ACTION t2: Uphold the Planning Commission ' s denial cl Use Permit 86-17/Negative Declaration 86--18 . .FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed eleven, (11 ) unit apartment project will be detrimental to : a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use 'or building. 2. The proposed structures will be injurious to existing properties and improvements in the area because: a . The number of units the applicant is requesting is the maximum number allowed in the R2 zone and development to such maximum would cause extreme traffic and safety impacts . b . There is an unusual mix of zoning and density in the area and the density requested by she applicant would be incompatible with existing development. 3 . The proposeed eleven unit apartment project will create urlue traffic hazards to the area because there is no dAirect access ` off an arterial highway (Warner Avenue ) and ingress and egress ! to the adjoining site will cause .additional traffic impacts and safety problems to Orion Avenue, Marina View Place and Sandra Lee Lane. 4. The Commission indicated to the applicant that a project compatible with the area would contain six units ( two units per lot ) , eighteen bedrooms , and limited to two stories . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Minutes of Planning Commission meeting dated June 17, 1986 2 . Area map 3 . Site plant floor plan, and elevations dated June 25, 1986 p ' 4 . Appeal letter dated June 20, 1966 5 . Letter in support of project ' 6 . Cad$ matrix o€ densi.l and building heights of exis ting stock 7 � Map , : Y 6. P�a r m ing Commission n at a f F 'rep or t dated June 17, 6 9" ' Petition in auPPort of ' the project r; JWP:RLP :p 'J RCk, - Jllly , 1986. r ,'. ®r� } it A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY ROWE, TO CONTINUE, AT THE 'APPLICANT' S REQUEST, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. . 86-21ICONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86-25/COASTAL''DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO._' 86-12 TO THE JULY 15 `1966- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING; VOTE: ,; 1 AYES Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher, Livengood , Erskine, Porter, Mirjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: None .-ABSTAIN: Nor.e MOTION PASSED C-3 APPEAL TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT ' S APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. EG TIVE DE'CZ�1 I96-18 On June 3, 1986 , this item was continuer/ to the Jun:: 1. 7, 1986 Planning Commission meeting in order for staff to work with the applicant and the appellant to discu3z and possibly arrive at a satisfactory agreement regarding the proposed 11--unit apartment project . Staff has met with the applicant and his architect in order to discuss and clarify site covr!rage , open space , a turnaround area , and parking re uirements . In addition , staff set up a meeting on Tuesday, June 1G, 1986 , in which the appellant , the applicant, a Planning Commission representative and staff got together and discussed the major issues of parking and traffic impacts , architectural enhancement, and number of units allowed versus the number of units that would best suit the site . The outcome of the meeting was that the applicant stated that the proposed project would meet the R2 zoning standards in everyy respect . in addition, the applicant stated that he is willing to consider lowering the number of units if it will be in the best interest or the City and the neighborhood. He is willing to consider reducing the density , if it will be acceptable to the neighbors . E14VIRONMENTAL STATUS: - The proposed project is covered by Negative Declaration 86-18. l THE PUBLIC HEARING 14AS OPE11ED Sue Linn , ,-esident in neighburhood, spoke in opposition to the project because of the impending, heavy on--street parking . Bill Halpin, resident , spoke in opposition to the p_o; ect . 'does not feel that the street is wide enough to accommodate the tzaf€ic He feels that the project will be dr!trimem=al to the neighborhood. PC tanutes 6f17/8E -3- ( 5r_OOd ) i l t Donna Clark , resderit , spoke in oppposition to the project because she doea not feel that it is compatible 'with an R2 or single family . development. She also feels that the project will create too 'much traffic and it will. become a burden to street parking . Bob Conway, neighborhood resident, questioned staff and the Commission: regarding the project meeting held on June 10, 1986'0 I.r Robert Franklin , Planning Staff , responded to his questions . Be , explained that a meeting was held with the applicant, appellant , members from staff and members from the Planning Commission . The project density was discussed along with the densities of adjacent properties . The applicant did agree to reduce his project to 9 or 10 . units . He further explained that the project did meet code . Vo ' firin decision has been received from the Homeowners Group. Jerry Same , Counsel for the property owner, spoke in support of the project . He explained that his client could request 14 units ;according to code however he only wants 11 . There is R2 zoning, with units , in the neighborhood. His applicant is concQrned about the other residents in the neighborhood . He felt that all of the concerns had been addressed. The property owner is willing to reduce the density but there have been no formal requests made . Mx . Bame :I feels that if the project meets code then it should be approved. I . Don Hartfelder , architect, spoke in support of the project . He feels his client ' s project meets all codes . Changes have been made to alleviate problem s . The bedroom m count been brought h t down. pis and at the same time t E ted to please his neighbors ' e t has a t m client p P enhance the neighborhood . 1 Bill Wilson, applicar:!- , spoke in support of the project. He stated that he has worked hard on this project and has strived for quality. He is very proud of the proposed development and he has plans to have members of his family occupy the first unit completed . There were no other persons present to spew: for or against the ? project and the public hearing was closed. j The Commission%:rs felt that the project has physical constraints (access problems , bad curve in the collector street and the access was , a narrow street ) and that the neighborhood was unusual . Since the Planning commission does have the right to set discretionary guidelines they felt that because of the physical and social ' impli'cations the project should not be allowed to be built to the . ` maximum number of units . Attorney Sangster explained the memo handed out to the Commissioners . The planning Commission may exercise discretion as to the location a.nd design of properties which abut an arterial i He also reminded the Commission that this proposal was getting close to the mandatory processing date. wit r, PC Minutes - 6/17_/86 4 (5500d ) �. Mq .I , . ,r.rr Tw'f ''"!+•'•OW N(biiClhti'` 4v i+A,<<Y" °'r=� 3Yz=L?f" .. .._ _ ... .. ..,-y.... ,.s..r .. ... AiAarul A.,' t-_ +A•�M'cti., Iw"�.= ell !"•,� ,t^.1lq - f The ,Commis g General Plan `I sioiiers agreed that the stories and 1 . ' do •�not `match . A move towards t he R2 standards and the less units woulo be more 'Compatible . Les ; Evans , Public Works , .said he -did not feel that there was anything .;unusual with the street in the neighborhood to create traffic ' ,problems , The Commission further stated that development in the adjacent R2 area has not pt'oceeded to the maximum allowed and since there- :is an unusual mix of zoning in this area a maximum density allowed on 'this project would be incompatible with existing developments . Two options were discussed . The first option was for 8 units-l8 bedrooms-2 stories , the second option was for 6 units-18 bedrooms- 2 stories. The applicant was proposing 11 units-22 bedrooms- 3' stories. %Commissioner Erskine stated that the Planning Commission should be a policy making board not a second planning staff . He felt that the item being presented was a unanimously approved BZA item and a staff approved (without issue ) item and that the Commission was now being ' asked to make a planning decision . He felt that further direction r . and information should be presented by staff . A STRAi� VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE OPTION FOR, 6 UNITS--18 BEDROOMS- 2 STORIES: AYES: Rower Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood, Porter , Mirjahangir NOES : E:-sk i ne .Terry Bame requested that he be given time to confer with his clients regarding the proposed option . Attorney Sangster suggested that the item be trailed until after the next public hearing item. iWhen the item was resumed , Mr . Bame , again addressed the Commission . He stated that his client- could not accept the Commissioner ' s I suggestion of 6 unit, , 16 bedrooms , 2 stories . He asked that the Commission act on the plan as submitted. Commissioner Erskine stated , for the record , that he would have � supported a compromise but, under the circumstances , he would be voting against the motion. He felt with the proximity and contiguous nature 'of the parcel to the arterial , Warner Avenue, that a public hearing was required on the project. He further stated that it is agp opriate for . the Board of Zoning Ad3ust,r�ents to Ais•_-uss the impact . of the project on or from the .arterial and that instead . the . Commission is getting into other neighborhood concerns that 'do nLN t relate to these impacts. f :. 15500d )PC minutes , - . 6/1?/86 -5-- , � ROMOTION WAWITHDE BY- SCHUMACHER, SECOND 8Y PORTER, T4 DENY USE _ PEKMIT AMENDED FINAINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood, Porter, MirJahangir, 'NOES." , Erskine ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None :MOTION PASSED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed eleven (11 ) unit apartment project will be detrimental to: a . The general welfare of persons residing or wo,king in the . vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. The proposed structures will be injurious to existing properties and improvements in the area because : a . The number of units the applicant is r.eauesting is the maximum number allowed in the R2 zone and development to such maximum would cause extreme traffic and safety impacts . b. Thera is an unusual min: of zoning and density in the area and the density requested by the applicant would be incompatible with existing development . 3. The proposed eleven unit apartment F project will create undue traffic hazards to the area because there is no direct access off an arterial highway (Warner Avenue) and ingress and egress to the adjoining site will cause additional traffic impact, and safety problems L•o Orion Avenue , Marina View Place and Sandra Lee Lane . 4 . The Commission indicated to the applicant that a project compatible with the area would contain six unity ( two units per lot ) , eighteen bedrooms, and limited to two stories . C-4 CODE AMENDMENT NO. }86-16 (CONTINUED, FROM APRIL 15, 1966� " M14Y 6 1986s AND JUNE 3, 19a6 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS) This item was 'first continued at the meeting of May 6, , 1986, in order to give the stable owners more time for review. On May ` 28, • 1986t Bonnie Wakeham of .T.I. ,Corral 100 met with staff to discuss their concerns . On� .,une 3, 1986, the Planning Commi.ssion' continued this item since no one spoke at 'the. public hearing. < ' Mg. " Wakeham has indicated that- she was in the audience that night, but chose not , to speak since she was sa y taf ,f . fist#ea with the changes made in the °ordinance " i k+ s {l 1 PC 'Minutes 6/17/e6 6 (550Od ) i y3 !'° ,.,1. r1="tl l..".;i�'li R` .•-^'i'lYt. i::' v-'_'uM^' '! 1x 1 .y c VA tU .n c+ .A JERrJME M. BANE C� �rA� A►TTORNCv AT uw n0 AI]O MAIN 1trACC7, SUITE I04 HUNTINGTON UCACN, C.AUP041NIA 0264a w 060-4310 June 27 , 1986 Mayor Robert P . Mandic, Jr . Ms . Ruth S . Bailey Ms . Ruth Finley Mr . Peter Green Mr . Jack Kelly fir . Dlm MacAllister Mr . John Thomas I blembers of the City Council ^ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , CA 9264P - f IN SUPPORT OF APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 86-17 ( In conjunction with NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86--18 ) Applicant:. : Mr . and Mrs . William H. Wilson Request : ':c permit the construction of an 11 -unit apartment project . Location : East side of Warner Avenue at the intersection of Orion Street. Dear Members of the City Council This office represents Mr. and Mrs. William H. Wilson ( "Applicant" ) , who are the Applicants of Use Permit No . 86-17 and the Property Owners of the subject property. This letter, written on beha'lfof Applicants , is to request your approval of Use Permit No. 86-17,/ Negative Declaration No . 86- 18 . THE PARCEL This triangular shaped parcel is situated on the East side of Warner Avenue at the intersection of Orion Street. In 1985, this parcel which previously consisted of 5 sub--standard lots , was consolidated by the City into 3 legal lots per the R-2 zoning standards. ZONING AND DENSITY In11963 , the subject property was annexed into the City as R-I . n 1 . Ehe City 1965 � Densit .esidential District .g The subject property has been : I . um initiated a zone change for this site from R-- to R- continuously. toned :R -2, therefore, for the past. 21 years . a City. ,Council Ouner27 , 1986, PPage CITY �'OF' HUNTINGTON BEACH 9e 2 . -Since 1964, . the R-2 coning district has been labeled Medium Density Residential ni5trict with the density being l unit per 2000 feet lot area, according to the Ordinance Code . . That term and density have remained the same for the past 22 years. In 1985, the City approved a parcel map which consolidated five non-comforming parcels into three legal parcels per the R-2 zoning standards . if the Applicant were to consolidate the subject site : .into one parcel , the proposed development would be subject to t Article 932 , Apartment Standards, and would allow Applicant to build up to 14 units on this same site . THE PROPOSED PROJECT There are three lots on the subject site, on which two of the lots Applicant proposes to build 4--unit structures and on the third lot a tri-plex, for a total of 11 units . j The proposed project, as presented to the City Council , is in com-- pliance with all Municipal Codes and standards for the City. No variances, special densities, or any other Exceptions are being requested by Applicant in the development of this proposed project. This same Project, if it were to be proposed to be built on other than arterial highway, would not require any Public Hearing, and could be appropriately approved solely by Staff . However, in this to arterial highways adjacent city, projects proposed to be built require a Use Permit and thus a Public Hearing. THE APPLICAN,r The Applicant, Mr. and Mrs . William H. Wilson , are residents of Huntington Beach . Mr. Wilson is a Mechanical Engineer by profession , having recently retired from an engineering practice after 39 years ( the last 26 years of which have been with the Bechtel Corporation ) . Mr. a,.,-] Mrs. Wilson own other income units , all. of which are sit uated - Nithin the City of Huntington Beach. They take great pride in the quality and aesthetics of all of their projects. Mr . and :ors Wilson reside within one ( 1 ) mile of this proposed project. They anticipate selling one or more of the units to their daughter and son-in-law, who will-then reside in the proposed pro- feet after its completion. STAFF AND HOARD OF ZONING 'ADJUSTMENTS ' APPROVAL The card of Zoning Adjustments, at its meeting held on May 7r 1986 , unanimously ( 5-0) approved Use Permit No. 86 , 17 Negative Declaration No. 66-18 , ,with the fol.lowing Findings for Approval : f 1 .-The ; establ i 'hment, `maintenance anci operation of the .pro-;. gored eleven ( 11 ) unit apartment ,praaect wL11 not,. be ; .y. City Council une 2;, 1986 Y CITY'"OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Page detrimental to: a The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building . 2 . The granting of the Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 3 . The project is consistent with the City' s General Plan of Land Use. Staff has supported and recommended this 3. 1-unit project . Staff has stated that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan . and within Division n Development S :andards. Even over adverse public comment, Staff has maintained that the R-2 :zoning classification on the subject property is consistent with the City ' s General Plan and that the R-2 Zoning is appropriate for the subject site . SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING and immediately adjacent The land to the North of the subject property , to the proposed site, is zoned R-3 (Medium High Density Residential ) . This land is presently vacant, but a five unit apartment project, approved by the Hoard of Zoning Adjustments on December 18 , 1985 , will soon be built on this site. The land to the East of the subject property , and immediately adjacent to the proposed site , is zoned R-2 (Medium Density Residential ) , and has multiple and single family dwellings constructed on it. Further East of the subject property, the land is also zoned R-2 Medium Density Residential , and consists of multiple-family dwelling unit . The land to the South and West of the subject property, not immediately adjacent to nor adjoining the proposed site, is zoned R-t-CZ (Low Den sity Residential-Coastal Zone ) , and consists of single-family dwellings . However, these dwellings are separated from the proposed site by ,,block .walls , large trees , or the breadth of streets , such as Warner Avenue . It should also be noted that the multiple-family dwelling units situated to and immediately adjacent to the proposed proj-� are 35 feet in 'height, whereas Applicant ' s proposed project is 30 feet in height . CONCERNS OF SURROUNDING RESIDENCE A i li,cant's proposed project is not the - first multiple family dwelling l:F ►� of the, � ortion unit 'project "nn the block. In act, a substantial p al.readv improved surrounding area consists of multiple family dwelling Units. city ;rune 27 , 1986 CITY OFuHUNTINGTON BEACH Page 4 The:-location and configuration of this subject `parcel of land is :particularly suited for a project of the nature proposed by Applicant. Similar :multiple family, dwelling units .have been, and will continue tor' be constructed adjacent to and- in the immediate vicinity of Warner Avenue and this proposed project. I. IN CONCLUSION In conclus_:on, therefore, it is emphasized that : The subject property has teen continuously zoned R-2 for the past 21 years , allowing the number of units proposed by Applicant _. .. * The proposed project meets all City Codes and standards ; f . . * The proposed project is immediately adjacent to and in the vicinity of other multiple family dwelling units ; ' * Applicant could, if they chose to do so, consolidate their lots and, thereby, request even more units than they presently propose ; * The Board of Zoning Adjustments unanimously ( 5-a0) APPROVED this project ( Use Permit No. 86- 17/Negative Declaration No. 86--18 ) ; * Staff has recommended approval of this project; and , * Applicant neither needs nor requests any variances , exceptions , or special densities which would require Council ' s discretionary, action or approval . It is, therefore, respectfully requested that the City Council reverse the decision of the Planning Commission and APPROVE Use Permit No. 86-1I/Negative Declaration No . 86-18. Most respectfully, JEROME H. BAME Counsel for Applicant JMB/l a L .°rr+' -Y✓,tf a ISM• • I4` _ �� ., .. z t . .�o.r�L !ti� r 1 T• i.l�t ��, r r i , t R2 R2 R2 RZ R 3IL lopR f A�•c� , ( R2 R2 R 2 R 2 R2 R2 R3 G4-CZ ! R3 J ` a R3 R'S R3 R3 1 .0 t u as KMoak a _..,..�. • ��• ----�� " w•c� \,.� � 042 V ' R3 fk3 R I•CZ RI-CZ u E R3 (R n R3-19 C2 spas Na ty RI R3 : s Ri RI-CZ iRK 2 R i � a« w sssx.un i � RI-CZ in � • • RI , Rl,Cz RI•CZ OWN 7 � � f ` . MYMTik6TOM NEM y M �, �.AP� a � R' A 11A1bm._ MU11 Ra , ♦d z T7 �ty 5' Y -r r y / 5 ^�� V �I'f 1 �• ��t j rs';~ f �: .•• ��� V.tr.±.MrY�+Y..•.reMww♦ .�.�.��v+Cs1n'�,t1�.f.li wt_.f ice... ♦ 4,-i aYat f ..:s1a a Y�U,#�� ..n6..M'• i `�y�i'!. r\�(I�k, ��:.'i w .3�'r'f�•, �i�,.:. � •y:,'. • 1' 1 ...+ :,� `.riff s.- ` r. `y+. t•,`� f L•x r w.nr+• •�Y^+a li3Miw7�'R`sai�:4 s^.. _ c_.+.tc. 'itt �.. 7 TH:�'".rtftl •r.�Y�'^._i2 ',4-.. .4' W#. .,c._. C� _ ,____ 1 ._� ...�5 .. +.r.. _— �� L .�Y e+ it!•i... •,la! a R ••.•.•.ter iat.r .. y - • -• •- • • • • • • •-SLIT w!. - •-Mfa N MTa's-tea.•••. •.f•J.tr•O,..aaM. •� •7r»n i..1•xl w• - T a•..•IL .... r -. 1-d Nefff�_Tire • - - li•Ra• NT•• .- Map -Ir.r.,►r�• ;•Tif•� _ -- gym.••w• �•. w. � _S- .•... we I " • . (1f• • • . . 3wr'�aa•aas-*-liT.•_�__._. .iw w•.....• - faa. .slft+vwa�ati ► Ci!. � - - F ♦• • 4 •p • • _ • WIN V P%"0 .n•NIT i-F— •�ZM d ••.•w•:.N.(,r•••1- • • ••V • • P......+.-•'.,M•I•.,:_ /ti••MC{+.• LIIr,a]r. •aMlr- w• • { �.• • cac.as r• ,ft •w.••(416."Ta •�p}.•«....•••aa.,•u).l.s•_ • - • i;.T�hl a••..r.r - :.t.�..•MwiM.t - - qwo 7 M.•dr-*-w Yfa •~io�i� t t • - \ cs w r oia•�na�'r••• `i .i 'ir.i• �•a , j.• - %.a)�rww )•a vok" ; .L-so._r••..a..:a*-aaa... .4 a••a'••,ma.repo" ,.♦••.••► Sa.A....• ,'...+••••waam •w... _ j� �L ♦.rrrr•..ye..�.i.w ; ti -:de Java AF r _ a � K rCY•wita•• �RNati - i ' ••C 3` -err. :.. •� � :�� � � •.c- � ' �'' 1 •may: ., pt t t AWL • •3../N+tiRrG.tT .•..t•- . .,� a - _. _ J i'.ra.►d -�...�... - •t•A .w•a.4aT1•W/T ►i/Ta lwwt A.....•a,wr ..•.•w •t��' - t - - �r 1-6 idar:.J\.r. ' s. DOFF HARTHLOER ARCNITE[T A.LA. ._..� ._._�._ �.-f:_�.Ps�f P �� .r....v�•-•.�..ww_V�Nwa-i, -.:.1i/.ML�I+wwMi�LKiM�iM.'Y<•.•. ._�.__Y+.;.,sy�.•rs...�_.w.�•w•.�,..�.in:-T::•R+wr� ;.�..n....._.-.�.....-._...__..r__..._-. .�.._....�.__... ...�/Iw.+a•�wr W � J 1 t � Z WGVqA SMAMIN : ' r _ aacnHa-�cbo�_PR.�.r•�. -._ . �,�cs��r-'�-L-nopc-. pi-'su—=:_. -�acor.to- Kc.00.t- ra=.:.s _ ll1 :- X*Ajcc.LL �_Tl�. - PA 2Gr—L 14.. Z _ A PLC LOLL- M. �r EL I _ '1 D01i NJ1><TfELDEt • Ats HITECT'•' /Ll J1. ••ter e'•1••rls &Otte a _- ■ivleero ��.+ saco++a PLMM ti�•r. ,.. �...�.ww«� -'.:..rw.Mn•. �♦ �. >..,'ten•.,: - _.._...� �... ����..�. �-.-... ,. .... it - i S., -_ •....� t J �•-.•.tea,,..., I �;2x, R_"G_�Ft.:OQ�'VPL' to N _ Rw-tiY}r1�—FLOOR: Pt.8 15 -MH I-3m—=tzcG . e•■f1e►.�♦�--•-1.�--...-�._..,-_ -�--1'te:�2 �Pe.r+tC-G.tr�N�:=.1— � � • 1f-.►a,-a.sL-a1�s'�t�_.•.tDL�� .J_a--�.._..-r L-•^t ��-•" � M.�:::1-`_" f _ 4 1. 0ON - RAWIFFILDI R 'ARCHITECT A.t A. - _ �+sta rhsw� PI.-Au-- - - .. -.AAA - __ I,iMK1-•,•• ql,r U,.•♦N- _ ...y,.••.� yam. - L�'�^._'�•�'MIaI!_..� _ -. - • _ Y _ _ -'w.r+..+_1+.. 1. ���-�.n..-.••'._+_��++,T+r-t.w v-v-.. ��. .. mow+_.w.... "�w.� w...r-wa�.a.����. - •_ Z .. • - Z,,,_S�R1C�R" IJhTL�Ltd.LS At3D_ Tef[Tt1RaGs = fo j , . • -rq+7.�J....r�[RTfa�b.h�L. ryrr/ �ru... - w, 11�.111` L i a _s�rr.o•• ..nsfT.eN:-fN/ablrRta"1M/wK:t�IfTT'c r ' IF� 1k ! ( i.�wiww7wwaa� lw..rtl�� :r_- a.rwwlas. ..•w.w�ata_a.Ir►�red;-''�r►s..i sw.+r. �. iL • _ . r _ t v � x ~a1, • , � • 7: iIIli 40 _ y �"yY .A R•.`l,I��_c.:'-;L=-' •' �► _V..�E•.= IJ_. iS G :_ _L_GwV-_ 1 _ - �1=5._ .. .. :: �. I A DON HART►E1DE[ '• AtCIdITECT• /Ll�'.'< :o*' 4'i imiir:1S'lii.i 7-E: � �_++ ::..�..a►.x�..ra...._- Ef .,S_K�tWlvaTtiow.,;_ t/S t ,•4 � t .' ,, !10. � ' ! ! ,Svc dr1 - , 7— ivy7. s irk% i � `'• 1 � I ''f r •,1 r - �I,t .�, � 1 :.ss h "{f:' •' ,.•�' ! •:Z T � j y�� -r•!w �, lr `Stu,}� t'�4N4 A` 'UNT IT ` .!� •yam + t t• 7 }r, ; _ !1<h •'. 1 .,'r t r .: , `S ih' t �'I', h o <I !4 5 � �c11.�' 4 r• t t :.� '�1W, ' }t ,;: �.j�.t i '�- ,,,. , .�Y �nr 1ct'�}r ) ► L, '1.,",(f .r. �•�r ll:�y. �RIN�f�: ;i` � ! 'i + , :,i ;r,u rj ,r+,�t, IC?•'?'? :'F ^� .T..i; f` 5. �. E'�_ e�. •'M �.,w y'. j� R�"' r ++�. f '� . , S :_; 4•l1Y'•(.�t :ti•�. .e: S ` 4 r i,,.,,,+�i�t. .;, :t'>`' �-� l CfTY co NCIL COMML -1CATION ' F / { •r t t�. r Fs� i ,; i'- ,1'.ni l r L,t i S.'I'�+ f ,/� •: -al' r�{��!•• _r�'' J.24A ON — •' �. '. TO . CITY COUfiGIr�MF.MBP.S h anal ' FROM COCTNCr N, D Ma.. ',AI,ICIAWENTWORTH . 'CI ) ' � ',� '' i`�?tk r:.-.• .. ... l Cs� .'ti I' ,,!' + t,�a` r;7 r, S� �,'y�`��•TI ' CL y �Ud�ECT: APPEAL TO PLANNING CO!�SVSISSION S OATE Juner -DETERMINATION,',REI,A'i'IVE TO: USE < r • . PER14IT .,NO. 86-�17/NEGATIVE Willa.�tn Wilson • .��cr.AP��zon� ss-1a - • memozandum as an appeal t o..the P l nnirig;�Commias n -s , P14 ;take ,r `sT t' ase accept denial �� Use.;Pe it .No ,, U. ,, 6C ; o J ne a6-�.7 I� � i t ;, �inQ the 'Pla , em -'C--3 f� 8 g :� obj eats,h to., the; find rigs of ',f ac rF sup�or u?9 a , nn la id ��t at, has"`been ,, ari , s r. � denial:'`'be'cause` of ' the existing zoning on .the r exis• or,` 21 ' years existence f , , • L k i • , Ir OF p • Ar „ 64 r , 1 , 1• ,. , .it_•..�� _: >.- '.•.'.,•.,l- , . �" t CRoM l",M. Bio►rw C , 1` ATTORNCY AT LAY/ n i4 il]O MAIN PtMCCT. SOC I!!C,'. MUAITINGTON PCACN.•CALIIORNI,t 4S�a �, May 29 , 1986 r Mr . Tcjm L' engood , Chairman ` rtr . Szih�. ;E'rsk'ine i 'Mr . Fra;,�� �►lirjanangir !,,�� , HIINTIyL�T�3�1;?BEAC • Mr. Marr`ushPorter H, Mr. Richaro Rowe DEVEL6`0,'A HT SERVICES Ms . Jean Schu macker Ms . Grace Winchel L MAY Z'9 1Q86 Planning Commissioners Planning. Commission P.O. BOX' 190 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2000 Main Street s y Huntington ',Beach ,, CA 92648 IN SUPPORT OF USE PERMIT .NO. 86--17 ( In licantnction %4x'th NEGATIVE,:-DECLARATION NO. 86-18 ) IAM H . WILSON PP„ , Request : TO 'Permit the construction of an 11-unit apartment project. - Locatio• n: East side of Warner Avenue at the intersection '`of Orion Street bear Planning Commissioners: This - office has been retained by Mr. and Mrs. William H. Wi;lson , who t are the Applicants of Use Permit No. 86-17, to assist Applic:ants ' in processing their -Application for a Use Permit and in opposing the `? Appeal that has been filed to the Board `of , Zoning Adjustments' AP- PROVAL of. their project , THE ' PARCEL This triangular shaped parcel , which is situated' on the East si de of Warner Avenue at the, intersection of Orion Street , has been 'con- tinuousl zoned 'R2 for the past approximate 21 �' P PP years;,,, It was purchased by Appl i cants ''in `or about 1979 from, the County. of . Orange . THE PROPOSED PROJECT Applicant proposes to construct an eleven ( 21 ) 'Unit 'apartment, project,` ' I t r r , + I +l,. .j< wwsrn } . 'Planning, -Commissioners., May 29, , I986 HUNTINGTON BEACH Page ~Z CITY•"QF. .:, - 4 , This proposed development/project is i.n :accordance wiith' al'l Muni.ci� al Codes p an Regulations of. the,.'Citiy of Huntington: BeAc; h inJ';all respects. ; In fact', no Public Hearing would''have been requi"red :'For this project , but for the fact that it is situated adjacent tc►''War- ner Avenue, po l.icant 'is not requestin p g any conditional exceptions ,; variances special ' ' special 'densities , or any other special privileges `or .rights in their ' development 'of this project. THE OWNERS/DEVELOPERS ;t Mr . and` Mrs . William H. Wilson, the Applicants , are rPsi:dents of the City of Huntington Beach . ; Mr . Wilson , is a mechanical engineer, by profession, having recently retired from an engineering practice after `39 years ( the last 26 'years -' of which have been with the eechtel ' Corporation) . h � fir. and .tits . Wilson . own other income units ,: all of whiare s itua}ed ': 1;• within the City of Huntington Beach. They take great pride in the quality and aesthetics of all of their 'developments . STAFF/BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS ' APPROVAI, The Staff recommended APPROVAL of Use Permit No. 86-17 in Starf� s presentation of this project to the Board of Zoning ''Adjustments. ' 'O `Ma 7 , 1986 , the Board of Zoning Ad 'ust y . n y . � merits unanimousl' ( 5 ) , APPROVED Use Permit No . `86-17 and this project. APPEAL Subsequent 'to the. APPROVAL by ,the Board of Zoning Ad justme ts , the BZA ' s action was Appealed by an owner of property in the area of the proposed project . This matter (Use Permit No. 86-17 ) is now `befog- a the Planning )Commis- sion. SURROUNDING PROPERTY/USES J ' As you will be informed behind the subject visually, the ;par- y med by Staf� both orally an .property y j s ' 2 . But par- cels oimrn site are R for a single house on the corner of a half-sized lot, the other -adja cent properties have multiple--family dwelling, uni°'ts constructed upon t„ them. There is also an adjacent parcel , yet undeveloped , zoned R3,;. capable of having multiple-family dwelling units constructed upon ' _ �L P1 ar.. ng Commissioners May 29', 1986 � + CI Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH page 3 De is nd� a : bl ock�:wall bar- veldg-meats located across Orion Street ( behi � , rier ) are zoned P.1 an d built as . single-family dwelling un its. . ' Proper- t� `6n the other;. side , of Warner','Avenue is . a 1 so zoned R1 and but 1 t as .4!i491e�-family dwell`i.ng units, .. and are separated by 'Warner Avenue to major, arterial roadway)!, and hidden by a bank of large matured trees G and natural growth. CONCERNS OF SURROUNDING RESIDENTS -PP P g p The Applicant has welcomed in ut .from surrounding property owners and concerned residents. Applicant. has addressed such 'comniuhications either directly with the property `owners and 'concerned residents, or in discussions with Staff and modifications ..to Applicant 's pro- ject . Applicant . does not believe that his proposed project will create either a parking or traffic problem in or to the area . The subject and .adjacont properties have been continuously zoned . k2Ior many years , and can adequately handle the parking and traffic needs of the present i and anticipated future residents of this area PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP PROJECT As . previously indicated, Applicant takes pride in lts development and subsequent continued ownership of its projects . This project would be no exception . Following completion of the proposed 11-6nits, Applicant proposes to own seven of such units and to se to continue 1 four of the 'units 1 to their. daughter and son-in-law Mhu will reside in one of the latter- mentioned units . Consequently, Applicant' s own family member will reside upon and have some continued control over the proposed pro- ject following its development. , IN CONCLUSION it is again emphasised that: *The subject property has continuously been zonedR2 for the past approximate `21 years . *The proposed development meets all municipal standards, codes and regulations . ' The Hoard of . Zoning Adjustments unanimously ( 5 :0 ) AP- ' PROVED Use Permit No. 86-17 and' this project . r'+�vt'ss+..: R.I,:.yrN+�:snty>'1 :i4a:tiF•-rX'M'.fkM81FNfW:fiSZS3f�MfaL+,iW..'_'1't'� 'i`.i?J'it.:.i:`.:k �.. .. ...^.....T.e.P-,.�_ 1 �ECM • Planning ;:Commissfones 'May 29 . ; CITY "OI' HUNTINGTON-,3EACH rpage 4 ti It pis , :therefo're�' `respectfully requested' that the P1'anning Commission ;f t►phold ,the 'decision of the Board o£ Zoning Ad justments and'APPROVE t Use Permit. No. 86=18 . Most respectfully, JEROME M. BAME Counsel for A li ca n pp nt JMB s ingw , i • i , I CODE , l�iATRIX�;:° R2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL- DISTRICT}"' DESCR.IE,TIONyi->.: . Pa rcel=�r Section - Issue;" Requir_d = 1 . -737 3 r - 9162.3 Density 1 unit per- 20_0CFfeet 3 4 4 91 62.4 Lot-' Coverag a 50% maximum 25% 30$ 32$ 9162.6 Maximum Height- 30 foot maximum 30 '" 30 ' 300. . 9163.1 rrontyard- Setbaek- 15 feet 15 15' : .. . 15+. . 9163. 2 Sideyard Setback Interior 5 feet 31 ' 5' & 12' 5' Exterior 10 feet: 16 ' none 10' 9163. 3 Rear -Yard Setback 10 feet 10 ' 33' 33' 9163. 3.11 Open Space 25% of -total floor`'area 42%* ` 25%* 24$* 9165.3. 2 Park:,ng Spaces 1 .5 per 'one :bedroomi; 3-2 bdrms..': 4-Z bdrms. 1-1'.bdrm: 2.0 -per` two` bedroow, _ 6 bdrms". = .8 bldims .``` 2-2 'bdrms: 2. 5- per`_three: bedroom �' ' 6 spaices = B ' spaces" 1-3.` bdrms: (includes-_ .5 `guest } _- 6 -bdrnie. - S;:spaces 'Does .not include area devoted' to driveways on the site plan:. (5333d } • 1 , ; W EXISTING POTENTIAL }� �;�'�� •r ; UNIT5 -UNITS' T. t� N 2 , 1' N r, t �. 3 4 .. .. U1.70 VRION - TOT 1 , Up 8,0 ,17MD '86,11 -18, R 2. R3-19 j ' RI ,cti 1 RI-CZ RI-CZ RI-CZ RI-C L: Tilt , ;• u v * ,�� s .i e! I '• _ _ �Z�` •�[.��i, ,1, 1 � ilC" . �� , �� { Ali ;I. � �,t t �• i � �� .,{ �• � �� tl t 30' 30' 2S t 30' y PALS t 5► MET 1 - 25' s' - Yt[!f'µ ir. .,. i.:•. �` fir. i3 4 0 V V V I9' 22' 22' 24' 28' 14' 30' 1�:` 18' lb' :22` 24` 22' 22- 2A sraEEr (3po 12' 28' 22' 30' g n* 5` r� �2 2 2` w _ ._„ r ,. . 0 2 I 2 2' v. _ yi• 28 251 22• 25' 14 f ,:25 2 =-25 r,,�r•. .. rti wJRtif' YjjW 0,4 12' I2M1+ I Z 29 30 Y. _ �•y- HlitiNGTO =BFACN G11ORNtR` - B IN ' !!£1CH?SSORVEY - PUNNfhiG7 DIVISION r hun�i� ton bdich dry lapr»�►nt sd�wi is 'dopirt man t. ff TO " Planning Commission i . ,FROM :: Developmentr.Sarv 'ices 'DATE: June 17 1986 SUBJECT: APPEAL -TO BOARD OF ZONING 'ADJUSTMENTS ' APPROVAL, OF USE � -PERMIT, NO. 86-17/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86-18 ELLANT: Sunset Neigh , . 'APPELLANT: r. C' •�' t5.` DATE ACCEPTED: " Neighbartiood Committee May 20, c/o I.,Robi1rt 'ConWay 171.72 Marina View Place MANDATORY,'PROCESSING "DATE: Huntington Beach, CA 92647 July , 1999 ; 'APPLICANT: William Wilson - ZONE: R2 (Medium I)ensitx 16961 Bolero Lane Wesidentfal Aistrict ) Huntington Beach, CA GENEIRAL'+PLAN: Medium REQUEST: the ofpan�elevenZ unit' �ap Residential District) y, Partment project . EXISTING USE: Vacant k: LOCATION: N•or t heart cornec of Orion -ACREAGE : Avenue and Marina View 1 .02 acres ( gross ) Place .52 acres (net ) 10 SUGGESTED ACTION: Uphold, the Board of Zoning Adjustment 's approva l: of Use, Permit Ho . 85,-17/rte skive Declaration a6--18 based on the findings and g' conditions ,of approval 'outlined in this report . 2 . 0 ' GENERAL INFORMATION: On June 3, 1986, this item was conti.nued ' to the June 17, 1986 ; Plarini'ng Commission meeting in order for ,stafE to work with the saCisfactornaatreementlregardingnt 'and drhecuss , and 'possibly arrive at a Y g proposed 11-unit apattrnent project . Staff hasatnet with the applicant and ; his architect in order to discuss an clam€y sf a coverage, open space , a tur.naround,. Tuesday, June 10 1986 £n which the a ellant the a llcant ing .+) area , :and parking requirements. In addition, staff set. tap a meet ` P1 Y� , , PP a 'PP i ' S on Planning Commission representative and staff got together and, discussed the major ' issues of parking and traffic impacts, architectural enhancement, and number of units allowed versus the number of units that; would hest suit the site . 7U , t•tw•aa�► r , �The`� outcor:ie of, the meeting was that the ,applicant, state8 that ;;the . , a F ds ive r ,proposed project,,would meet :the . R2 zoning standar n :e _ , c,e e s ct. : In addition, the,applican ' stated that he is :wil3. ng to y` ii consider ...owerng .then0mber of . units 'iF,,:it wi13 ,'be . in':'the.`best� t yr , t of ,'the'. City ,and he i e'i gghborhood . He is t;+ filling to interes neisi'd r reducing he deslsi y, �f,_ i� will be acceptable do the J -9 rs `and• if ;the ' Planning 'Commission deems -'it necessari+ in order to ' roitigate 'traffic 'and parking concerns. 3 .0 SURROUNDING LAND ` USE '1614ING AND -GENERAL L PLAN DESIGNATIONS: <<' , North 'of. 8'66je6t Property: . GEN. ERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: dium High 'Dens`ity• Residential Me ,ZONE RS '(Medium. High • Density ;Residenti;al ) LAND 'USH. Vacant (proposed , five unit apartment project approved 'by HZA 'on December 181, 1985 ) :. s' East of Subject Property. GENERAL FLAN DESIGNATION: Medium De• unity Residential ZOriE . R2 (Medium DensityResidential ) ' - :_ • , D U LAN SE dwellings .: Apartments and single family dwel South and tiniest of Subject Pronert GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential, ZONE : R1_CZ ( Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone) LAND USE: Single family dwellings � 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is covered by Negative Declaraticn 86-18. . 50 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable . 5. 0 , REDEVELOPMENT STATUS : ; Not applicable . 700 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable . 8.0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE : Not. applicable . Staff Report 6/17/86 -.�-- (5412d ) .0. ALQUIST PRIOLO GEOLOGIC `HA Z�i RD -ZONE 9 'Applir'ation for, all new,-,real `estate . developments and structures for. human_ occupancy,, wi'thin -Speclal� Study Zones,,-sh l`3 be accOmpani:ed•�'by a geologic report prepared by a ''geologist , registersd,In- the State. of California, ' and directed to the problem of potentia3 :surface f��ult displacement through the site . 10 . 0 ISSUES ;AND - ANALYSIS': 'I In '1963, the sub ject `pr'operty, . as part . of a larger area , ''was .a nnex'ed into th e City as R1 ; " Gow tensity Residential Di.striv:t .`: , In ,1965, the � � City , initiated. a zone change for this, s;.te . from R 1 .�to. R21. Mpdum Densfty , Residential -District . The ,-subj`ect , prope..L3,. has been•, zoned R2 , since 1965 per..-"ordinanc:e; Nc. : ?163 . Staff has dine. additional labeled' two farr,il residence , district which ermning "s'ih le Laos' research which indicates, that in 1963, the R2�'z6 Y P single family , Awe . i�t to d .,_ per12,000 � squareXteet�ofalotkalreas � In 19,64 , the Huntir; was one .unit 5 .The density facto , ngton Beach Medium' ' "Code was modified, and the R2 zoning. district, was,:.relabeled Ordinance Density Residential District. ' and the density remained: one unit per 2,000 feet of lot area . The term and the density. have. remained the same .. , ], the R2 Medium Density Resident-ialtDistrictais tincluded ,.�i . th � y y e t . attach meets,"the at the end of this report . � The proposed e�cseparatect is antracturesevien nit01�pJulmc�.0 p198ScttneiBhardlo ? , result in,, thr _ s n y 1 1 ► o f s 1, , Zoning' Adjustments approved Tentative Parcel Map: Nn.* 85�-239 ,which' consolidated :five nor.-conforming parcels into three_ legal, parcels per the, R2 Toning standards-. As part cf the ' aPProval of� the ; . , : tentative ' parcel ,map, a twenty toot' w de private driveway ea3emEnt was established across parcels 3 and 2 in order. to provide street ofcthe lots there will are -three lots and c the third of :on the site-, on wh t third lot there will be a tri-plex . The appeal to the BZA 's approval haled- of the assertion 'that . the x letter dated Ma 13 , 1986) . The q' eal fists; 'ffI a ma or r ( see , , and is iot good for the area. Y PP ,.. ''. , j. easons why ' ect �.s t4o density the residents , in .the vicinity of the p.rop6sed pra3ect. oppose ,;the t, construction ,of ,the 11 unit apartment 'project. The appeal letter ' identifies ( 1) future traffic increase ; (2 ) , `the private driveway across parcels 2' and„ 3; r ( 31 the close proximity to r1 loll ;density y residential areas ( custom homes on Marina 'View Place and 'Huntington Harbor 'homes , across Warner Avenue) ; (q ) the potential of tenants parking of.f site; and ( 5l " fault-line" hazards as the five sria jor reasons to deny Use Permit No. 68-1.7 . In response to the l concern's of the appeal letter, staff' main ., P rains � � p r �s consistent with the General tan and with. . ) _ that ..he �L'o,jert-. i Division 9 development standards . The subject property was annexed into the City in 1963 an•d has been zoned R2 since 1965 and the C' Staff Report - 6,/17/86 -�3- (5412d) J' 1 • i \ } r has been vacant theuane da tiMe , ne ' a ' sitf� is Cl. • Y Tha' §ttb jeer proge..ty 1d`cated ,in .the • Alqu:_st--Prtolo E r hq .k , z nd " ttie wi21'�need to �beaa��iressedhanobmf tblated�br.ems ior toscciated with faults .}^ 7,! , 9 P onstruction. In Y 6 the, last," aragra'ih of the, appeal letter :the'rc is a request foci the '.Planni.ng t6mmissi.•on to initiate a 'decrease an the ,`peemit;ted density t, the site .and 'rezone.•the, site to R1 (cow:`Density Residential} y a£f maintai'ns that ��he R2 : zoning classification: i:z `con:►is,te:�t, with the City ' s General P1'an `and 'the ,R2 , zoning is apkopriate,ifc�r" the st'tQ . In ' summary staff fee s .hat a comparison :of development standards a d dens�.t ' Will 'a Sx`nic`e;: there `ssast . i n evaluatin3 this s'.tuati'on { ' , ed parse areal is . s�sit a `which :"created three `leq l , :. buildingpsote ,, arcelpmap on ttivub jest.. to. R2 zoning standards Which i.s more Irestrictive ' than Apartment- Standards. The . following is ,•a matrix ` which ,illustrates the comparison. Article 916 - F?2 Art 'cl'e p32 , ,: Medium D"'iity ??esidential Apaztmenk :Standards ( Actual.) tH_Ynotheti'ca17 Density : 1 unit per 2000 sq,ft. I uhi't-'p"�er 30000 net .lot area (after gross lot: .ar'ea ( include street dedication) centerlir'e of street ) Pa s':ce l : No . 1 No. 2 No . 3 N� 1 Lot Area ( square feet) : 6, 503 31207 8 124 44 3`ao Number. .of Units/Got : 3 4 4 ' = 11 total 14 total As the above matrix reveals, if the applicant chpse to con soli`daEe the. subject site into one parcel , the -,proposed development would 'be Subject to ,Article 432, AFartment ' Standar'ds, which would allow .up to a total of 14 units at the sia,�. Applying R2 `density. at the,'; site is more restrictive ctive by allowing n 11 units instead of 14 . I As indicated in the General Discussion portion of::�this,1report , the Applicant The majormet with staff and many concerns wer�►;j:i .• . �iiscusSnt and ,, . - . y was applicant is .grilling to reduce the overall unitacounssfaomnelev�en , to, ten any 'possibl� to nine if the appellants_ are willing to 'commit,,-on. what they would be satisfied with . Ass of this date, 'the appellants . have not indicated- to staff gar the ab"plicant what would be an : acceptable number of units , 1 staff Report - 6/17/�6 -- „ {5412dj � . , I " ' Stafr s up ports the,, eleven unit apartment ro ect' and recommends that the Planning ;Commission uphold the _ Board ,,of Zoning ,;Adjustmentz ! approval,', of . the' project . Staff` woi ld%also'' recommend ,that the proproviding' recessed windou`se�tossibl byrovcassing tbe, bal_canies, �.-, ject t.bge enhanced: arch' " . . " ° addition al,, wood.,t`reatmenk"; and intensified -.landsca fhg along" r ., , p y p a some •��.s tone ,wo r k � P . Orion .. Avenue in 'order to, provide, an apartment., project which would be more aesthetically compatible with the existing single family homes. . '11 0 RECOMMENDATION : Plarinin Commission"' uotiold the 8ZA's 'a royal of , that the Based ca the ; for.egoing iri�Formation, staFf recom 86 1,7/Ne ative -Declaration No , u6-18 based on _tf Ufollowin find g n9b he' 'following findiYS 9 : and conditions of approval . FINDINGS " FOR "APPROVAL: P 1 . ' The. establishment,, maintenance and oeration of the proposed : eleven All ) unit apartment project will not be detrimental to : a. The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such 'use or building . 2 . The.. granting of the use permit will; not. adversely ,affect the � General Plan of the City of Iiuntingron Beach . 3 . The project is consistent with the City' s General Plan o'f 'Land Use : CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The site plan, and floor plans dated June . 13 , . 1386, shall be the . ' . approved. layout . 2 . The 'elevations shall be revised to depict 'rec(assed baIconie's recessed windows and provide de some cosmetic architectural enhancement . 3 . Prior to issuance of building ,pe.miws, the applicant shall submit � . the following plans : 'a. P,ri'or to , the issuance of building pe,rmits, : the applicant ; shall submit_ a 1andsca` a -.and irrigation plan to the p , Departments ` Of Dev,elopment . Services and „Public ' works.. for exact t ' a apprbval . Said landscape plan shall,,-.indicate,- the act. ,ypa and, materiiI of block wall _ to be installed and. shallPublic be. Workssubject Departmentrand�Departmentnof Developmentn ` the �I Services. ` 15412d ) Staff Report 6/17/86 , v b. p quf.p' Said plan shalll,, indicate Roofto Mechanical �, ;Went P7. screening of all rooftop mechanical equipment . and shall delineate the type of material proposed to screen said equipment'. 4 : The , deve2'opment -'shall comply With all- `appl`icable provisions og . the OrdinanceCode, Huilding Division, ar:d Fire Department . - , 5 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation - systems shall be comoleted. 'prior to occupancy of .units . 50 Natural gas shall 'be stubbed in' at, the Jocatfons of cooking facilities, water heaters, and 'central heating units . 7. Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots a'nd .water faucets . '8. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber,. wire, 'pipe; and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them . 9 . The structures on the sub 'ect. ro. �7 P. oPerty, whether attached �or det3,ched , shall_ be constructed in com liance with ' the Sta ' p to i h' PNEL acQustintours of the property .:. The Interior .�noise` levels o cal standards set forth for un is : that,;lie within` thf a60 ll` dwelling units shall not exceed the California ''insulation-•;. h. standards of 45 dba . CNEL . Evidence of compliance ,shall consist . • ' of submittal of an acoustical analysis report , preprrec` under the supervision of a person experienced_ in the field of acoustical engineering , with the application for building permit( s) . la . If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division,. 11 . Got Nos. 2 and 3 shall enter into an irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement . The existing 20 foot easement shall * be. expanded to coincide with the 29 foot driveway and 8 foot parallel parking areas. 12 . All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance. of building permits . 13 . A landscape agreement shall be provided and filed with the Department of Development Services prior to issuance of building ,, permits . 14 . Trash enclosures shall be located away from the east property line which abuts existing residential structures. 15 . The Planning Commission reserves the right 'to revoke this Conditional Use Permit, if any violation of these conditions or the Huntington Beach -Ordinance Code occurs. staff 'Report - °6/17/86 --6- (5412d ) ".{ / , r 1 , .i , 4 •I 12 . 0 'ALTERNATIVE" ACTION: A1 'Prnative Zto 1: If, the ` Planning . Commission feels :that t e number,: of: units should ' be reduced, , then 'thy Planning Commission could 'diiect the applicant :to =' revise the plans to reduce "the number of units. s , Alternative' 'No.. 2 i Deny Use Permit No . 86-17 , based on' •the following findings: `FrNDINGS : FOR ..DENIAL: ' p p' pr. 1 , The eska ; . e t. bli'shment maintenance and. o eratian of the ro os d eleven ( 11 ) unit apartment protect will be detrimental to's : ' a . The gene:r'al ` .welfare of persons residing or working in the Vicinity= b. Property and improvements in the vicinit of such� ,use p y • orr building . 2, The .proposed structures will not be compatible' with . adjacent, properties. 3 . Ingress and a , . egress - to to the site has the poaenti:al ,,of ::.creatinc r �. addi:t.i'onal traffic impacts to Orion Avenue ; Marina View Place end Sandra Lee Lane. ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area Map 2. site Plan and, .Floor Plans dated Jude 13', 1986 3 . Minut'es from -April 30, 1986 and May 7, 1986 Board of Zoni.n Adjustments meeting ` 4 . Code matrix r 5. memo - from Fire Departmentsdate' de June u apartment project 12, 198b 6 . Staff report dated June 30, 1986 } JWP . .pb I staff ' Report -_ 6 1? 86 " _.i_ ,54126 �fwfK: tole ,.. R3 �?. -R2 R2 R2 R2; • R 13 OCAAtr ti �-c R2 R2 R2 R2 �R2 R2 P3 -CZ t R3 I ' R3 R3 R3 'R3` Ja All. • `� Ry is '+ �' ;M=1 R 3 C 4" t R I•cz. f R •cz ft. - ���R3 4 R RfRI .. c naw i a Gti RI-C Z RKZ RI•CZ M RI-CZ t Ri-CZ RI • AVE RI-CZ . • f -� O HUNTING?ON NEACN� rLA1tMIMG'D!!'T � � ' "�•T .�:'°'r«•c � ' , r :y nutes , 4. B. ..8oard of Zoning Adjustments A ri1 30 , 1986 -� Page 5 The spires and : c himaeys '.are ' acceptable and shall not ' excea_d Forty feet '( 40 ' 1 in height . 5 . Al applicable Public 40rks Department- fees - shall paid . s. A . The st cture ` shall meet all ap plicable side ya setbacks . "U.FON .MOTION .BY,, ODFREY . END , SECOND BY,1KREJCT , CON IONAL EXCEPTION R .'. ti - 3 W i ► 0. 86 Z AAS DE ED AITH . E Fa 0 G FIND IN 8,{ THE FOLtO It G . T'i LL WIN IN I � 'VOTE:. ' FINDINGS 'FOR DENIAL:, 1 Because ' of the size configura�io , shape and lack of unique topographic features " f the sub ct,­property, ,thete.:.d e- s .not appear to be exception 1 or a raord.inary. circumstaaces 'oc conditions applicable t 'the and , buildings,, or , premises , i involved : that does not a generally . to property or , class of uses in the same distric j p y be fully : , Since the sub' ect . ro ert ca. : within. : regular established etbacks , ch a 'conaitional except ion:.' is noF . necessa'ry, for he preservati and' enjoynent of substantial property rights 3 . The propose structure will xaot be c pat ible with adjacent j properties 4 . Granti of Conditional Exception No , 86- 3 would constitute ` a spec 1 privilege inconsistent with linita . ons upon properties in he vicinity . AYE' :. Evans, Godfreye Krejci N S : Poe , Smith SEN`r: None USE:' PERMIT .NO. 86--1.7 .'NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-18 A 11c a. p� c nt: William H., Wilson A' . request to perm; t the construction of an eleven` t 111 un i t apartment 'project. Sub yject propert is . Iocated on the East side of Warner Avenue at intersection ' of Orion Street . This request is covered b Negative Declaration -No . 86.-las 9 Y Staff repocted the applican'.t. 'is proposing an- el ,even.:; tll ) unit apartment , + wo, .( 2 ) fourlexespandeone�(1 ) triplex 'on,indi�vhdualllots . 'The for P P 9 +5 4/30,/86 - SZA 01 :a. '{Xil-,"itN,S.wc•�4.M:. '-T::•IiL e.1i.,t,.L'Y ,. .. `..+a.4;'` .' a7?.. .. ?..ill! .._._...,.:...'.r�.+�+w-•-.- — .r..rn..,...,-�..� Minutes , H. 13 soard of Zoning' Ad ustinents April 30, 1986 i Rage 6 h = s ,{'parc4ls •is R2 aut' ;Staff .h•as 'ceceived, several letters expressing ensive . pro ject in a , th r es idecnit alr heighbdrhood. Sta an so ,'� aff :'also had ;concerns .;that one• o6 e rooms shown as ;a. den would be used asila', bedroom;,.. how , . the _ � 1 � e�ier applicant has assured' Staff he will l ave the room asp a .den With ' . �PPropriate openings . Staff lurther 'stated 'the reas+�,n :.the project was.-before the. Board was that` it was located 'on an arl:erial highway - Wane'r Avenue. Daryl Smith i4iterated the project did meet, zoning` requ`irements under . the R2 classification and the Hoard would have no;;3uthority t0 statement 20en isKrejci mentioned Sthefappl icationw�ras •`before .' the 9 o P Board for review of architectural features only. After further discussion, Tom Poe opened the Public Hearing-- and the•• ` applicant , William H . Wilson, was present. Mr. . Wilson stated. he `:had purchased the property with the R2 zoning to specifically 'construct 9 9h an . apartment uld ;,be :living,, there and •-nanaging the apartments . , Mr I.his furthe• r stated he would be Iffill�ing to work Otith the adjacent property owners to alleviate any problems they felt would arise . Kathleen Johnson , 17092 Sandra Lee Lane, objected to, �he„ proje ' ct because of an increase in on-street parking which would be created by people. "sharing" the apartments and having more than . one or two cars per apartment to park . She also stated she had presented Staff ` with letters and a petition from other residents in opposition to the project . Another adjacent property owner , 'Sumiye onodeka , 17101 ,sandr a ,Lee',': , Lane, Wilsones she shouldubet three limiteduto ,lower dennits -on' her sitpetha' ,he as 1 M p Y than .',he he was. proposing . Bill Winn , 17192 Marina , View Place , said stye owner wa f. oner of a custom home on an adjacent street W and he as in opposition to having an apartment project built so close to his 'home Staff was proposing _ Tom Poe : informed the audience that , ' p p ing _a- one'week continuance, to .see if problems could be clan d ,between the aplicant nd adjacent •owners . Glen Godfrey iagain :stared the problemith and this Board had no authority to ssion ensued between Glen • Godfrey and E Daryl strith regarding the none change process . Ted Dowding, 1,7192 Sandra Lee Lane, and.�Naomi B. George, t17212 h Marina Ve Place , Prth ` sk� In' opposition to thep oeect . , i' There were nootherersos, peeenihig to speak for or _ gainst, oeprjectan the Public Hewing • w�A's lift open since the applicant. { had indicated he Would request a continuance. 4/3OVJ86 - BZA: ; , t ' °1 Minutes, Fi . , 9 :. Hoard ,of x4ning Ad justmenta Apr 11- Pag-Q 7 MOTION .WAS MADE 9Y:- EVANS AND.:SECONDED ; ,.. ._ ... , eY;:•SMi:TK FflR CON':I►iVAYCE OF w � USE :PERMIT N0. 86-17 AND 'NEGATIVE DECLARATION N0 , 86-18 -T0 THE i MEETING OF MAY 71 1936 . '. { Glen Godfrey .asked AE the `.mnaker and seconder would :request specific t '1•evatians r . ied and resubmitted .such 'uld�:►�pl�t9 pQana. nec�Avenue as : . stems, be rlah^u, the . proposed . building would e W r and:4djicent property, etc . The maker aria se-corider of the:, motion agreed . ; MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ' AYES : Evan s , Go FreY, Krejci , Poe, Smith NOES :. Nonz ' .ABSENT: None U E PERMIT ► O . 86-30 Aa t ican t : Pat 's -Ski and S R ort Shoo A re uest to pecmit a parking• lot sale for three . i3). days , dub' ec j t prope ty ,is located at . 8909 Adams Avenue (Northwest corner . of ,Adams Avenue 'and Magnolia Street ) . This . reg est ; .is covered by Categorical %xemption, Class ' , I� Californi Environmental Quality Act , 1984 . oth` s approved,•b' � Staff state this was a request. identical to y the - Board in the ast for this 'applicant for tempo ry , parking • lot sales . Staff ecommended approval with- cond ons . ION BY .S TH AND SECOND :BY GODF_R , USE PFRMTT '. ' , APPROVED WITH THE �OLL,OWING` CONDITIONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: C�?NDITIONS 'OF APPROV 1 . The conceptual. sit plan ceive d April 178 1986, shall be the - approved layout . fled ;`in• ,2 . A. , CertiEicate of In r nce-form shall be f the, �. Administrative Se ices epactment `in, , �.c ' ability Claims �Coordl deemed an amount necenator, along withsaaHol.dyHthinlessAgree nt executed by the insured, ,at least three 3 ) days prior the 'event. 3 . ,� Certifrfcate to operate, as r wired by 5A730:80 'of the Ordin ce Code, , shall be iss3 ed for to the event.' 4 . T applicant shall provide for cle up of the - area after , the losing of the Event. I, ..�.. �4130/86.• � BZA MINUTES HUNTINGTON BEACH -BOARD- OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Room B-;b .Civ'ic Center �. 2000 .Main Street ,. Huntington t3eacn4l CaltEotnia. WEDNESDAY; IMAY 7 '1985 -- 111' ' P.M. is BOARD MEMBERS -PRESENT: Evans, Godfrey, Rre'jci , Poe,' Smith STAFF MEMBERS ; PRESENT. Franklin ,..MINUTES : UPON ', MOTION . BY: GODFREY AND.,--SECOND BY EVANS , MINUTES,:OF,, -THE•'REGtJLAR" MEETING OF. APRIL; 23�; 1985, WERE'`11PPRnVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWrNG VOTE: , AYzS'. Evans , Godfrey, Krejci, Poe; Smith NOES: None ASSENT: None REGULAR -AGENDA ITEMS: USE?*" PERM1 T - N0 . ':80`17 4EGA 'cantDECLARATION ,NO . 86-18 (Coat . from 4/30/86) N w Y William H . Wilson. A'> re nest ' to, permit the construction � of an el:.ven tlI u q a nit $ s of P P j Y Warner 'Avenue attintersectionrofe0rion�Street�d on the East side ' ; This request is covered by Negative Declaration Ito . et-l8 Robert F'r an k l i re S taf f: ,Member, n, ;Forted th'e requ! en .cont, nues from 'the prew;fous •neetin'q to ,give the applicant, an ouhdtn ro er,ty; owners;;in an +eYffort : to 4 opportunity -,tov , posb1e . arkinq >pruble .... sityx, proble; s',, etc .. The.,request rr solve posyi. . •, ,_ work 'with, s zs'. for an ` eleven (ll ). 'unit a�part.ment ' . ms , den P p Project ,ko consi'st of:�}tw© �-(2 ) dour I _ ,,,.. ;.. , ; . . .. ... ., . . om tte y ropes ' f lex:e. ind 'one tl ) tri lex. and Staff 'als4 has some concern Staff needs .assurance ,fr: p arty over ,.rooms sr,own •as: dens� , . owner. "the 'rooms ;will remain as dens not ,became :bedrooms' Staff is further , conditioning , that Lot's 2 ; 'and 3 shall • 'enter ..into 'fin i r revocable dr Ve'ways, easement "The,i:.e ha<<e been ,'suggestions .f ro'm j P. P. ad scent ro erty "owners on' Marina View; Drive; that Lhis proper ty;:be` 'rezoned 'but,;• a9 :,discuss,e'd` at the,�Orav ou9::-meets.ng, , this ' Board ',does not. have a''uttior'ity"`to„rezone these : arcels. Staff is re men`ding approval ',of the project with con i't'ions . , 3 %Ii'nutes H : 8. Board of Zoning Ad jtsstments May , 7, 1986 Pa ge 2 Daryl Smith inquired whether., the ;new .building height llmitation would affect; this project and:: Glen 'Gou�'f'rey explain"ed the,,�propos3al ri ,. gr'ade ';tlevels. ;etc : treewastalsouacd.is'cuss on ,be'tweeh,lerninisr�Crejcf ,and ',Tom' Poe relative '_o i� shake roof in cornFariso.-i to `�t . composition roof . ; Th , Hi earing had remained open ' from the , previoca' meeting : Tie 'applicanr, 5�illiam' H. - ' s ,present, ;and stated,he had net with P„ •P Wun,:.wa some ofthe • ro erty owners afters the previous: meeting`. He:said s eak�in ' soecificall for •:.`the �Clarea as�Athe,,`,`leader and, she .'was al'§o ;• .�athleen ,�ohnson, had _been designak P 9 y ks . Mr . Wilson further stated .,he had agreed to the speed bumps and, was amenable to a stop sign being `placed if it was approved by the City. D, �_'�HarK�felder,, Architect on the project , explained they. had reduced the;;height from thirty-two feet (32 '.)_ tor.;thirty feet (30 and had ,_ , made.; other, concessions to , City requirement '' $g well as ao .khe',•: propetay owners . Mr. Hartfelder stated, he -,felt it . was an *excellent project and would be an asset to the community,,,. esaecially ` in' comparison to some other projects in 6'e surrounding , area . Daryl ,Smith expressed concern- over the type o: I I which would, .: eno-close Portien•.rall and project and daan type . discussion `ensued concerning h P YP , Floyd G. eelsi tot . Attorney, spoke in. opposition to the project and: ,, . also reiterated the zoning issue . He further stated this part ,culaz .property had originally been zoned R1 when first incorporated by the City Bob Conway, 17172 Mar inae ,, r ' ob'jected. :co having apartme nts so close to his "custom h.Vi and felt there would "be, a :t afftc problem because of the proximity to the long curve on Warner Avenue . Another. resident , John De Geonar`di , 1.i102 Sandra Gee 3Lane , ''sp o k e in' in. -his triplex since 1975 . He further stated Mr. Wilson was ; d gavot of ; the project: . Mr . De Leopardi stated he owned : and' had live fulfillingpall requirements for the. r.o ect and Mr.. De Leonardi fel the project would enhance the neighborhood . ..,..Donn • .. ,, , .. ,, dra ' L d fel o: ee.: t,ane and o S e'et an ,t a Clam stated she lived near the cornet of. San Oci �n , tr traffic generated b the sect would Y pr definitely create a problem and parking spaces would be . even - harder to find 'than at present . There rwas anp ,one ,els,e, pretent the Public 9 ' a, desire •to speak,, either for o against p j c Hearing was closed . , ` •.•1. - -2- 5/7%86 -- BZ� ' ", .,, ....+-..w,.w.'er..•,....... ,.. ...... ...,...._.„r�r.ww+.e.naNw,v ans: -'- - -- !•� y f y y y .Klnu,tes, 13. ' 8 : Board of ';Zoning Adjustments , ,y3y 7 1985 0. Pa.ge ',3 7` , , . 17 AND AND SCCOND BY . yITH, U5E P£RKGPQ� > K©TIO Ifi N0 `, $6 NEGAME .DECLARATIO,N ;.vO. '86-18,:W Rw:, APPR0VED:,M'ITH 'THE : FOLLOWING FrNDINGS AND CONDITIONS ; 'BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: " r i%11)114GS. FOR : k OkbVAL: 1 The establ-ishment�, ma'ineinance and operati.o`n of, the proposed eleven: t+ll3 unit apartment project- will ;not ,be detrimental - gene'ral well of • , .e a . The • • pexsons residing' or working �,n the vicinity t b . Pra ert and im rovements in the vicinityof such P Y P .. . use ar building . 2 . The .,granting 'of the use permit will_ not `adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach . 3 . The project is consistent with t'Je City ' s General Plan' of, Land Use, CONDXTIONS OF APPROVAL: , 1'. The site `plan', floor plans ,, and elevatiocs received .and 'dated May 61 1986, shall he the approved layout with the following modification: a . Revised elevations shall be submitted depicting a hip type roof on all garages . of bdilding permits, the applicant: 2 . Pr`ior to issuance p t shall, submit the following plans : a . . Landscape and irrigationplan to the Department 'of ;.: Development Services and Public Worsts for review and approval . b . Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan . 5ald ;plan shall ti indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical� eyuipment and - shall dAlineate the type of material proposed to ,screen said equipment . 3 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of '' . the `Ordinance Code , Building Division , and Fire Department . 4 . Prior to the issuance of building permits , the appylicant shall ` submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the Departments of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval , -3- 5I7J86 - 'RZA • nutes , "a . Be 9oar`d of zoning ad ' �t19tn1etltS . :May " , I986 Page 4 " Said lands` e �and materia? , `cape elan shall, indicate "thee exact, typ of . block:. liall'� to -be.. installed. and ,sh'all ,'be 'subject., '.tO' approval . of'.'the . Landscape Di'vis ion of ," the'Pub',ic Works :Department and Department of Deve'logment Services',. `, , Instal la t ion of r edu"i red I andscaping: aad i r r cat systems + 5hall be completed within 'twelve (12) months . 6 . Natural as shall be• stubbed :in at the locations+ 'of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units . • - p ' is and water 'faucets .7. I,o�r volume ' heads shall be used on 'all s • ego .. � , ,+ . ts . . 8 . -All building spoils, ,,,uc h a s u4usaible.,lumber, wire , . pipe,,' and. . other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed ' of : at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. ' 9 . The., structures on the sub ject property, whether..;dt4ached ,,or detached, shall: be: constructed in compliante with .rhe� state. acoustical ' standards set fueth for c hits . that .lie within : ,Elie 60' . CNEL contours, of the property .., Evidence oh compliance s+tialx + CNnsf�t of submittal of an acoustical analysis 'reFort^, , prepared under the supervision of a ,person experienced in � the' field of.. acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s ) . 10 . if foil--type insulation is to be +used, ' a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division . 1l • Lot Nos . 2 and 3 shall enter into an irrevocable rect proca'l driveway easement . . 12 . The 3oard of zoning Adjustments reserves the right t.o revoke this Conditional Use permit if ny violation of these conditions of. the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code ' accurs . ccu ancy, the property + owner , shall si n nota_ iz.. and, record . '.with Prior co Lssuance of a Certificate of 0 + 9 � , '' A , - with ;►:he Countx.,,RecGcder •- �. n � n Letter of A3reemen t assuring that ''thr ,. rootr, identiaied'`as a =den on the Second and Third . Floors shall remain as - a den K not a bedroom unit . - 14 . All applicable Public, Works Rees shall be paid prior to issuance=of building permits . '. .AYES: Evans , Godfrey, Krejci , Poe, S;aith NOES None ASSENT: None Sl7/ - SZA + Y. , R2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) { DESCRIPTION Parcel L Sectfion . Issue Required 1, 2 _ 3 ^9162;3 Density 1 unit per 2000 feet 3 4 4 9162 .4 Got Coverage 50% maximum 25% 30% 32S r 9162.6 Maximum Height 30 foot maximum 30 ' 30 ` 30 ' 9163^ 1 Frontyard Setback 15 feet 15 ' 15 ' 15 ' 9163 :2 ' Sideyard Setback Interior 5 Feet 31 ' S ' & 12 ' S ' Exterior 10 fees 16 ' none 10 ' a 9163: 3 Rear -i�ard Setback IO feet 10 , 33 ' 33 9163.3:11 Open Space 25% of total floor area 42%* 25%* 29%* € 9165.3 2 Parking Spaces 1 . 5 per one bedroi�m_ 3-2 bdrm3. 4-2 bdrms. 1-1 bdrm. 2.0 per two bedro6il 6 spaces = 8 spaces 2-2 bdrms. 2 . 5 per three bedroom 1-3 bdrms. ( includes 5 guest) a 0 spaces " *Does not'- in,clude>=area devoted to driveways on the site plan . (5333d ) ' a �i c . .;. Ye•.e. .. --•'.'i t!, � . ! +.,.t`1M.r.W4?'hk'Nl+.r�.«,_ � — -— .._....: .i CITY OF HUN TINGTON BEACH INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ►VNn'41c r+"4CH ) S To Tom Livengood, Chairman From Tam Poe 5L Huntington Beach Planning Commission Deputy Flre,tAa_shal Subject UP 086-17 Zc ND 086-18 Date June 12, 1986 The Fire Department has reviewed Use Permit #86-17 and Negative Declaration #86-18 located north of Orion Street and east of the Warner bend. The following ioill he required by the Fire Department for approval: I. Fire apparatus roadways must, be provided for fire apparatus to within 150 feet of any portion of the building perimeter. a. Access requirements must comply with Fire Department Specification 401. (See attached) 2. An approved water system capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection must be provided. a. The fire flow must be cepnble of supplying 3,500 OPM. Werner Avenue will provide the Fire Department with access within 150 feet' of all building perimeters To enable the Fire Department to use Warner Avenue for access, the developer must agree to provide openings or gates wide enough for fire fighting operations Fire hydrants and mains would be required to be placed on Warner Avenue to be within 150 feet and to provide the necessary fire flow requirements t Should Warner Avenue not he used because of access problems with the property, then Orion Street would be used for fire fighting operations with the following conditions required to meet access and fire flow requirements: 1. The driveway ente ,L'ng the complex would iunve to become a fire lane, having a minimum width of 24 feet. 2. A hammer head or radius turn around at the end of the,driveway must be provided to comply with Fire Department Stnndard 401 or 401.1. (See attached) i a. Exception: The turn arol`k% may be omitted when,'nll' residential units have a automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout. � I i 5196f ,I fit'. �.+ 4 -+ ,. 1 .,t ,.;, - 'i• t - --- — - `�(�• Z". CITY SPECIFICATIONS 3p..C1f1Ca io , 401 Desc P MI 4 n �10 WItvtIJM STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE' rt #ion. .� .. _.. .� -.�_ REFERENCE NUNTINGT gE . STREETSE ALL TYPES QF FIRE CC-DE SECTION: 4�.ZU -(F) DEVELOPMENT S For Information Relative To This Specification Contact Huntington Beath Fire Department i Specification: 1. A. All portions of ground level perimeter on all buildings shall be within 150' unobstructed travel of an improved roadway. B. Travel over walls or hedges and through hindering lai,idscaping does not qualify as unobstructed travel. II. Private street or roadways shall have unobstructed drive widths of not less than 24' (based on two 12' travel lanes) A. Parking :hall nog Infringe upon this space (see Specification #401, Page 2, Items 3-A, 8 and C). 8. Garage doors and eave overhangs shall not infringe upon this space except a•) permitted per City Specification 402. C. Corners must allow for clear travel as per City Specification 401.5. Ill. A. Strr';� ts, drives or roads exceeding 150' but less than 600' in length and Lerm; ,ating, shall be provided with a radiumd or hammerhead tum-a-round as t per City Specifications 401, 401.1, 401.2 or 401.3. B. Streets, drives or roads 600' or longer in length may not terminate in a radiused or hammerhead turn-a-round but must become part of an inter-tying loop circulation system. C. Minimum turning radii on private streets cr access roads must: equal or exceed the dimensions in City Specification 401.4, APPROVED, 1 � to tIe f City Administrator 4 LM:ds � I y .�1geQl�oB r1 32/83 tiK 1:7 CITY SPECIFICATIONS Specification np; 401 . I Descop tion: .:.RFiI`.VATI. :'i:UL-DC--SAC STREET' OR ACCESS_. WAY . MINIMUM. STAN A REFERENCE MURiTTINGTON BEACH � ~� FIRE CODE SECTION: 10 207 ( E ) For information Relative To Thb Sinoificstion Contact Kuntinoon s.ach Fire Doprrtmart: SPECIFICATION : MINIMU"A "HAMMERHEAD" TUr�NAROU D . 2 8 r. :• i r i i 53 ' 75 ' i � za CL . f� �i FOR STREET WIDTH LESS THAN 28 ' REFER TO SPECIFICATION 401 . 5 ' r FOR CORNER CUT-OFF OESIGN . ' Y } REV'I SED .9/91 huntington beach development service' s department �ftf Ep R TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services - DATE: June 3, 1986 - SUBJECT: APPEAL TO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 86-17/NEGATIVE DECLARATION 86--18 APPELLANT: Sunset Heights DATE ACCEPTED: Neighborhood Committee May TO, , C/o Robert Conway ; 17172 Marina View Place MANDATORY 'PROCESS I NG DATE : Huntington Beach, CA 92647 July 20, 1986 APPLICANT: William Wilson Z R2 (Medium Density 16961 Bolero Lane Residential District ) Huntington Beach , CA GENERAL PLAN: Medium REQUEST: Appeal the BZA 's approval RezidenEiai District) of an eleven unit apartment i project . EXISTING USE : Vacant LOCATION: Northeast corner of Orion ACREAGE: Avenue and Marina View 1`. 02 acres (gross ) Place .52 acres (net) 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Uphold the Board of Zoning Adjustment 's approval of Use Permit No . 86-17/Negative Declaration 86-18 basid on the findings and conditions of approval outlined in . this report . , 2 .0 GENERAL INFORtiATION: On March 24, 1986 , William Wilson applied for Use Permit No . 86717/ Negative Declaration 86--18 which requested to construct an ' eleven unit apartment project at the northeast intersection of . orion Street and Marina View. Place . on May 7, 1986 , the Board of Zoning Adjustments (HZA) approved Use Permit No. 86-17/Negative Declaration 86-18 by the HZA by a vote of a" to 0 . The project was reviewed ,hy, the 9ZA because the project is wore than five units and because the . site is adjacent to an arterial , hi hwa (Wanner . Ave j 9 Y nue y . . The $ZA . reviewed the project 3n berms of architectural features-;•enddevelop ` - reflectmenheiraconridencehthatAtheaclon I �mpea1rf,mous aPF>•ova?' v ..:4 +` project ts ' the intent of the G?neral Plan and the R2 zoning district . A-VM.t3A kv ,0 'SWROUNDI " Ng LAND USt, , ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS : „ North of Subject Proper: GENERAL FLAN DESIGNATION: Medium High Density Residential ZONE: R3 (Medium High Density Residential ) LAND USE: Vacant (proposed five unit apartment 1 project approved by BZA on December 18 , 1985 ) East of Subject Property: GENERAL FLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: R2 (Medium Density .Residential ) LAND USE: Apartments and single f..�mily dwellings South and West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Der:sit-y Residential ^+ ZONE: RI-CZ (Low Density Residential-C^astal Zone ) LAND USE: Single family dwellings 4 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: i The proposed project is covered by Negative Declaration 86-18. 5 .0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable . 6 .0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable . '� . 7. 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable . 8 .0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 9 .0 ALOUIST-PRIOLO GEOLOGIC HAZARD ZONE : - Application for all r n n new real estate developments and stuctu a res for 'human occupancy within Special Study Zones shall be accompanied. by a geologic report prepared by a geologist registered in the' Srate of California , and direc-.ed to the problem of potential surface fault displacement through the site . "' Q• • 'Staff Report - 6 3 , 35 �.. � � � �.(529i d ) w , l yy ?�} 10 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : The proposed project. is nn eleven unit apartment project which will result in three separate structures . On July 10, 1985, the Board of Zoning Adjustr_ents approved Tentative Parcel yap Ho . e5-239 which consolidated five non-conforming parcels into three legal, parc`ls per the R1 zoning standards . As part of the approval of ' the tentat?ve parcel map, a twenty foot wide private driveway easement was established across parcels 3 and 2 in order to pravide street access for parcel 1 . :'here are three lots on the site on which two of the lots there will be four unit structures and on the third lot there will be a tri-plex . The appeal to the BZA ' s approval is based on the assertion that the, project is high density a "is not good For the area" (see letter, dated May 131 1986 ) . The appeal lists five major reason- why the residents in the vicinitl, of thus proposed project oppose the construction of the 11 unit apartment ps o jest . Thc: appeal letter identifies (1) future traffic incr6:msa ; ( 2 ) the private driveway across, parcels 2 t.ad 3; ( 3 ) the cloae proximity to R11 low density residential areas (custom homes on Marina View Place and Huntington Harbor homes across warner Avenue) ; ( 4 ) the potential of tenants parking off site; and ( 5 ) ''fault.-line" hazards as the five major reasons to deny Use Permit No . 86-17 . In response to .he concerns of the appeal letter, staff maintains that the project is consistent with the General Plan and with Division 9 development standards . The subject property was ennexed into the City in 1986 and has been zoned R2 since 1965 . The subject property has been vacant the entire time . The site is located il, the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Hazard zone and the applicant is aware that the possible problems associated with fau',ts will need to be addressed and mitigated prior to construction . In the last paragraph of thc appeal letter there is a request for the Planning Commission to initiate a decrease on the permitted density at the site and rezone the site to R1 ( Low Density Residential ) . Staff maintains that the R2 zoning cla,sif'ication its consistent with the City' s General Plan and the R2 zoning is appropriate for the site . In summary, staff feels that a comparison of development .standards and density will assist ;n evaluating this situation. Since there is an approved parcel map on the site which created three legal . building sites , each parcel is subject to R2 zoning standards which is more restrictive than Apartment Standards . The following is a matrix which illustrates the comparison . staff. Report 6I31A6 -3- t5294d ) " Article 916 - R2 Article 932 Medium Density Residential Apartment St BA Ards ( Actual ) (Huothetical)_____r Density, 1 unit per 2000 aq. ft . 1 unit per 3000 sq.ft . net lot area (after gross lot area (include street dedication) centerline of street ) Parcel : No . 1 No . 2 No . 3 No . 1 Lot Area ( square feet ) : 6,803 8 , 207 e , 124 440300 Slumber of Units/Lot : 3 4 4 = 11 tctal 14 t0tal As the above matrix reveals , if the applicant chose to consolidate the subject site into one parcel , the _propused devtrlopment ; would be subject to Article 932, Apartment Standards , which would allow a total of 14 units at the site . Clearly , applying R2 density at the site is more restrictive by allowing an 11 unita instead of 14 . 11 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing information , staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the BZA 's approval of Use Permit No . 86-17/Negative Declaration No . 86--1a based on t-he following findings and conditions cf approval . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed eY,�!ven ( 1.1 ) unit apartment project will not be detrimental to : a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of slIch use or building. 2. The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach . 3 . The project is consistent with the City ' s General Plan of Land Use . Skaff Report - , 6/3/86 -4- CSI�.9dd � I w i CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The site plan, -'floor plans , and elevations received and dated May 27, 1986, •shall be the approved layout . 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant shall submit ` the following plans: a . Landscape end irrigation plan to the Department of Development Services and Public Works for review and approval . b . Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan . Said plan shall indicate screening of all rooftop mechanical e: u;nment .and shall. delineate the type of material prnposea to screen said equipment , 3 . The development shall comply with all - applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department , 4 . Prior to the issuance of building 'ermits , the applicant shill submit a landscape and irrigation plan to the Departments of Dbvelo ' Ment ,Sei vices and Public Works for review. and approval . Said landscape plan shall indicate the exact type dnd material of block. , wall to be installed and shall be subject to approval of the Landscape Division of the Public Works Department and Oepartmcat of Development Services . 5 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systc-ms shall/ be completed within twelve (12 ) months . 6 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations ,of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units . 7 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . 8 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 9 . The strictures on the subject property, whether attached or detached , shall be constructed in compliance with the State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 50 CNEL contours of the property. Evidence of complionc: 'shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report , prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering, with the application for building permit(s ) . 10 if foil-type insulation , is to b cti yp a used, a, fire retarda`nt type shall be installed as approved by the Building Division . ; 11 . ;Lot Nos. 2 and ' 3 shall enter into an irrevocable reciprocal driveway easement . Staff 'Repoct, 6/3186 794•d') ,r c.,, s;�.-:4 di c:..`. 12 . The Hoard Of Zoning Adjustments reservers the. right to revoke this Conditional Use Permitif any - violation of these conditions of the Huntington Beach Ocdinance Code occurs . 13 . Prior to, Osuankne of a Certificate of Occvpan�y, the property own er shall .sign # notarize , and record with the Cocnty Recorder a " Letter of Agreement" assuring .that the room. identified as., a , den on the Second and Third Floors shall remain as a den and not a bedroom unit .14 . All applicable Public Works fees s ,al.l be paid prior to issuance of building permits . 12 . 8 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Deny Use ' Permit No . 86-17 based on the following findings: FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: it *-he establishment, maintenance and operation of the proposed Pleven (11 ) unit apartment project will be detrimental to: a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b . Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use ,or building. 2 . The proposed structures kill not be compatible with adjacent properties . 3 . Ingress and egress to the site has the potential of creating additional traffic impacts to Orion Avenue, Marina view Place and Sandra Lee Lane . ,TTACHMENTS: 1 . Area Map 2 . Site Plan, Floor Plan , ar;d Elevations dated May 27 , 1985 3 . Negative Declaration Assessment 4 . Letter dated May 13 , 1986 5 . Letter dated May 29 , 1986 6 . Letters stating opposition to the project JWP:,R a y Staff Re?Qrt 6I3%86 --6-- t529'4d ) ` • a ,t r �r • E� •• R 2 "" �� ��1 R3 R2 Rc R2 ,�, R2� ��.c1 --ram- � r�, r R2 , R2 R2 R2 R2 R2 R3 � i t «rcz 1 u C4-CZ I Y R3 R3 N •,. '� __�:� R5 R3 R3 R3 .2 a y Q R I-c1 R �� '_k R3 R3 C4' �-cz Q •.a: I a R A' R3-19 1 C2• , t '• Al .[ n4ai Y. N R) R J R I 13 wn..fo+M.•eor tr '4 RI-CZ 'RKZ RI-CZ RI-CZ •1 x Rj%'Z RI AVE - F.!-CZ lb ,1) •,tiJ J,;, HUNTINGTON $EACH PUNNING -DCrT. ii i , 1 , CITY O Ht��i'�'iWDG Ali INTER. .., , O 5MMIM UEpAFiT�+IENT COMF�,UNtCATI hl To From EIMIRONMENTAL RESOUR::EE. SECTION 1 Subject C�dW Aril 22 1986 NEGATIVE .DECLARATION � NO- 86-ia Applicant. William H. Wils,^n 15961 Bolero La ;� t 845-8043 Renuest: t Request to construct an 11 unit apartment pro' Ject consisting'Hof 3 buildings �! Location: East side of Warner Avenue 95' from Sandra Lee Street Background � Based .ryn t�: staffs initial study of this project a Draft Negative Declaration was publ ished' in, the• local newspaper and . posed in the Off ce ' f the City Clerk for a 10-day public reviewperiod eroding �, E �P , and ��/,., no coanenm the attached- c, a ints were ce ve . Recommendation Th nviro�uental Resources Section reGomrcnds that the ' qto—n . a prove Ne ative Quc ar. 8f-1� cJ • nd1 '.that t e ropose pro ect w 1lpnot have a significant adverse a ect ort the erivironment. p 9 Mi t,i gation Measures r.r. � ��r err r• The attached mitigating mea3ures will reduce ote ntia.l envi ronmental effects r�esu tang from the project and are recommended as conditions of approval Respectfully submitted, 6j.: ni 6 Texan Blaisure ' �ssiscanr ` Plar?aez r a ' t JR6/dc ` ?{`:t }. . L ` , .`F_tr1 t, 1,,fy 4�a1 ... , t ' -, { .• 1� . i.' ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Imo .. ,STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL 1101? r 1 . BACKGROUND 1. Appl i cant William H. Wilson 2. Address 16961 Bolero Lane _ 3. Telephone946:8043 4 Poe,ct Location East sid_e_ of W_a-�rne�r. _�.,_ venue, feet from an ra a -MU'_ stin5. Project Title escription R_ .ue_�t . uct an unita ar men aeZ `ronsi -i. Date rit 2 1986 g 11 di ngs 11 . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS : (Explanations of all "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are required un attached sheet) . I. Physical Environment: Will the project- have a significant impact on the physical i environment with respect to: a) hydrology, b) air quality, c) geology, d) flora anc fauna , e) noise, f) archaeological/historical . Yes Maybe No Othee 2, Impact of Environment on Project: Will the project be subject to impacts from the surrounding environment? i .e. , natural environment; manmade environment. Yes r Maybe No �/ 3. Impacts on Public Services : Will the project have a significant impact upon, or re- sult a need for a new o:- altered government service in any of the following areas : fire, police, schools, parks or other governmental agencies. Yes Mirybe No 4. Impacts on TrafficiCirculation: Will project result in substantial vehicular move- ment , orimpact surrounding circulation system, ac increase traffic hazard? Yes Maybe No a. Will the `project result in a substantial alteration or have a negative affect on the eAisting: land use, population/housing, energy/utilities , natural resources, human heal th? Yes __ Maybe No ,j fi. tither potential environmental impacts not discussed above (see attached sheet) . ill . OTHER RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES AND/OR PERSONS CONTACTED ( ) See Attached ( ✓ ) Not Applicable IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF S15NIFICANCE: 1 . Will project degrade qu.,lity of environment? Yes Maybe No 4Jf i j 2. Will project achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage Of long-term envircrmen.al goals? Yes Maybe _ No 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? Yes +M gybe No A. Will the project adversely affect human beings either directly or indirectly' Yes Maybe No , V. DETERMINATION ( } Negative Declaracion ( � } Negative Declaration With Mitigation { ) Environmental Impact Report01 DATE SIGNATURE i�J S? i MAJO MMIGATI I-EASUIW Natural as and 220V e g lectrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryr�-s. . 2• Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cod..i. ng facilities, water haters, and central heating units. 3. Low volume heads -glall be used on all showers. 4. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable naterial, shall be disposed of at ar, offsite facility equipped to handle `.hem. S• The stn.wctures on the subject prcperty, whether attached or detached, shall be cmPli.ance. with the state acrustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNM contours of the prgvxty, ,ThO .i s"terior noise levels of all dwelling units shad not exceed the Cali.fozria insuiat;Eon standards of �5 dba C2�C,. Evidence of Ompliance shall oonsist of sutmittal of an acoustical analysis report, Prepared under the supervision of a persm eAperienced in the field of acoustical , with the application for building permit(s) Al..'.. measures to mitigate noise to acceptable levels sh,*U be nc o porated into the design of the projc-ct. 6. If lighting is included in the Parking lot and/or recreation aria energy efficient larps shall be used (e.g. high pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) . - 11 outside lighting shall be directed to pnevent "spillage onto adjacent properties. 7. A detailed soils analysis shall be prepaze+3 by a register d sails en Shall include on--site soils engineer. -Is analysis provide aztpl�.ng and l�.bvratnry testing of materials detailedto foundat.ions z reo�rrxydations regarding grading', chemical and fill properties, taining ,;al�.s, streets, and utilities. ; 8. If fail-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department. S. An engineering geologist shall. be engaged to sdmdt a In-Port indicating the grrrnmd surface acceleration from earth movemnt for the subject property. All a structures wi.thin this clevelopncj it: shall be Cons trusted in CC=liance with the g--factors as i rldi.cated by the geologist's report. Calculati.ons for footings and structural mgnbers to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits- 10. A plan for silt control for all sta= runoff from the prcpe_,ty during construction and,during initial c peraticn of the project shalt be submitted to the California R'egzonal Water Quality Control BCard staff for their review prior to the issuance of grading pernnits. 11. Information on equipment or facilities which way generate asac Pollutants shad be subnitted to the South Cost Air Quality anager;vent District ,staff for their revie; prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Ccc. n� for any use within the building, 12. ! c 13. , - 1 MlMae�_ : F4,1 2'1,?tnfyp♦z- ,.n..y , _ "--- -- — — - _. r ,.h ..rt.! 40v. qu;!`.P.G. HUNTINGTON BEACH Pay l3 1986 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MAY 13 `1985 Planning Commission City of Huntington. Bch P.O. ,mach, C, C P .O. 1 ap-4 26 4 Huntington BA 9Z6�8 , Huntington Beach, CA 92648 rear Planning Cor,mission: This letter is from residents of the Sunset Heights .area recarding, our ocjection and appeal to you retarding Petition Document Use Permit) t86-17 ;:egative Declaration i. 86-1.8, applicant, Willi.-am H. Wilson. We reel our objections are valid and in the best interests of the City , as well as the Sunset Heights C=...^..unit,, and we especially hope that all the -embers of the Planning Commission will be able tc view the objections we cite Lelow, on the site, personal,,. 'We have written several letters to various departments of the city and over 35 of our signatures are of record. We feel that such a high density apartment &-ell. ing is not good for the area for many reasons : A) There Will be a tremendous increase in traffic on two streets riot designed to handle the increase. Marina View, originally an undedicated street , is much narrower than a normal size 2treet at the Orion Street intersection. This resulted in the City recently restricting parking (none) in order to lea.,,e as much room as possible to negotiate the turn . The City also put double lines to try to control the tendency of drivers to drift over beyond the middle of the road. The system has not worked very well b`cause of the 1 unusual radius and the narrowness of ►.he street . � The apartment complex has a proposed alley that will entrance and exit at precisely the worst point in the intersection. B) An alley, in itself, is a da.. ereus situation that causes problems in any community. Alleys are a necessity in commercial areas but are not desirable ir, the . : residential areas of Southern .California and are seldom used, except ir. situation,: to increase density . 1 Q Often chances occur over the years in the development OE a City that were not foresee �, cpmont part of a horse as was n• Tt: �_„ lard originally was p tu, e . later it condemned" to be used for the Coastal Freeway yow• it ic e valued at over 5600, 000. „ uoi:s withR-1 homes , son contio The Sunset Heights area has devc,lneichhocrFd into a nice rocula rlcod of single Family residences and the transient n of anot„er anar. tment co„�I.lex would crcat3y detract from the area and add pressures " .. . to the neich1tor,cod and city services alike. D) There is little rccri for Off-street parking . The sir, street is already ;per;• c_:�gecte;; 9 all the existing residentw ate hor^e • (in "c evening) When all - The uests of the apartimivnt dwellers would not be able to park nearby . E ) When �hr west side of Marina View was developed, c: ty was informed that a _ • el..ped, the Possible "f�ult-?ine" trade it a poor buildingsite. ' Cpposite information was given to the city by developers and many very expensive properties were built on the bluff side . More recent ; Sate of al � .nfort;►ztion b the i.cr... a i 7di:•a,tes tt �.. ,.: ..L y active fault running thou h t is an 9 he property. In addition, we would also ask you to consider that theme apartments will be built on a ;rain arterial entrance to our cit and cannot be aesthetically pleasing, Plus they will suffer y greatly from their proximity to Warner (as the rese the property Facing Warner have found out ) . F nt owners of pr rMIt NO, 86- 7, _• The Sunset Heights Neighborhood Cor„mittee requests that Planning Co;r,m.ission take steps to lower the tens above-mentioned lots and re-zcne then to R-1 • ity of the A petition with many of the neichtoncccd residents has provided to Mt . Bob Franklin, Project Coordi:ator . Sincerely , SUNSET HEIGHTS t:EIGHBOR? HOD CC►!'."".ITTEE cc: Planning Cc,►:niss� -�n: . John Erskine Toro Livengood Frank Mirjahangir Marcus Porter : Richard Rowe Jean Schtimacker , Grace Winchell ; x_ I EROME M. BA-ME AT'TaRmc*f AT LAW 2170 WAIN STACCT, SWI'C AGO HUNTINGTON 6CACH, r-AWrOAVNIR. O.'?SAC 171A1 940-A3?i May 29 , 1986 Mr . Tom Livengood , Chairman Mr . John Erskine Mr . Frank Mirjahangir Mr . Marcus Porter HUNTINGTON BEACH 1 Mr . Richard Rowe DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Ms . Jean Schumacker Ms . Grace Wi nche l l . Planning Commissioners MAY 2 510„2-5 Planning Commission P,O, Box 190 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 IN SUPPORT OF USE PERMIT NO. 86-17 ( In Conjunction with NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 86-18 ) Applicant: WILLIAM H. WILSON Request : To Permit the construction of an 11-unit apartment project . Location: East side of Warner Avei%ue at the intersection of Orion Street Dear Planning Commissioners : This office has been retained by Mr , and Mrs . William H . Wilson, who are the Applicants of Use Permit No . 86-17 , to assist Applicants in processing their Application for a Use Permit and in opposing the Appeal that has been tiled to the Board of Zoning Adjustments ' AP- PROVAL of their project . THE PARCEL This triangular shaped parcel , which is situated on the East side of Warner Avenue at the intersection of Orion Street , has been- con- tinuously zoned R2 for the past approximate 21 years . It was purchased by Applicants in or about 1979 from the County of orange . THE PROPOSED PROJECT 1 Applicant proposes to construct an eleven ( 11 ) unit apartment project . I • I Planning Commissioners May 29 , 1986 ` CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Page 2 This proposed development/project is in accordance with all Munici- pal Codes and Regulations of the City of Huntington Beach, in all respects . In fact, no Public Hearing would have been required for this project , but for the fact that it is situated adjacent to War- ne::* Avenue . Applicant is not requesting any conditional exceptions, variances, special densities , or any other special privileges or rights in their , development of this project . THE OWNERS/DEVELOPERS Mr . and Mrs . William H . Wilson , the Applicants , are residents of the city of Huntington 3each . Mr . Wilson, is a mechanical engineer' , by profession, having recently retired from an engineering practice after 39 years ( the last 26 years of which have been with the Bechtel Corporation ) . Mr . and Mrs . Wilson own other income units , all of which are situated within the City of Huntington Beach. They take great pride in the quality and aesthetics of all of their developments . STAFF/BOARD OF ZONING ADt171STMENT5 ' APPROVAL The Staff .recommended APPROVAL of Use Permit No. 86-17 in Staff ' s presentation of this project to the Board of Zoning Adjustments . On May 7 , 1986 , the Board of Zoning Adjustments unanimously ( 5 : 0 ) APPROVED Use Permit No . 86- 17 and this project . APPEAL Subsequent to the APPROVAL by the Hoard of Zoning Adjustments , the BZA' s action was Appealed by an owner of property in the area of the proposed project . This matter (Use Permit No. 86-17 ) is now before the Plannirg Commis- sion. SURROUNDING PROPERTY/USES As you will be informed by Staff both orally and visually,, the par- cels of property immediately behind the subje't site are R2 . But for a single house on the corner of a half-sized lot, the other adja cent properties have multiple-family dwelling .units constructed upon them. There is also an adjacent parcel , yet unde veloped, : zoned R3 , capable of having multiple-family dwelling units constructed upon 3t . Ask lei PI ar►:. .n Commissioners Ma .2 1986 9 9 . Y ci y 6F HUNTINGTON BEACH Page 3. Developments located across Orion Street (behind a block wall bar- ; pier ) are zoned R1 and built as single-family dwelling units . PYoper- ty on the other side of Warner Avenue is also zoned R1 and built as - single-family dwelling units , and are separated by Warner Avenue (a major arterial roadway ) , and hidden by a bank of large matured trees and natural growth . CONCERNS OF SURROUNDING RESIDENTS The Applicant has welcomed input from surrounding property owners and concerned residents . Applicant has addressed such communications either directly with the property owners and concerned residents , ' or in discussions with Staff and modifications to Applicant ' s pro- ject . Applicant does not believe that his proposed project will create either a parking or traffic problem in or to the area . The subject ' and adjacent properties have been continuously zoned R2 for many years , ` ' and can adequately handle the parking and traffic needs of the present and anticipated futur residents of this area, PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP PROJECT As previously indicated, Applicant takes pride in it-s , development and subsequent c.,:ntinued ownership of its projects This pro ject would be no exception. Following completion of the proposed 11-units , Applicant proposes to contin-ve to own seven of such units , and to sell four of the units to their daughter and son-in-law who will reside in one of the latter- rentioned units . Consequently, Applicant ' s own family member will reside upon and have some continued control over the proposed pro- ject following its development . IN CONCLUSION ' It is again emphasised that : *The subject property has continuously been zoned. R2 for the past approximate 21 years . *The proposed development meets all municipal standards, i codes and regulations . {' *The Board of Zoning Adjustments unanimously ( 5:0 ) AP- PROVED Use Permit No . 85--17 and' this project, y - Xa 29 , 1986 Planning Commissioners Y CITY .OF HUNTINGTON 'BEACH payP a It iS, therefore, respectfully requested that the Planning Commission uphold the decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustments and �APPROV^.•. Use Permit No. 86 18 . Most respectfully, JEROME M. BAME Counsel for Applicant ' 3MB :mgw F - r; I Apr 11 `25, 1986 HIIIMNaTON BEACH MOMENT SER CES APR 2b P.O. tax 190 Mr . Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Nuntialton Bwh, CA 9M3 Hoard of Zoning Adjustmens P. O. 190-02648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr . Godfrey: We the undersigned are residents of the Sunset Heights area of Huntington Beach, and as a group wish to lodge our objection to the proposed development as described in your letter to several adjacent home owners of April 22, 1986, for Petition/Document : E Use permit No . 86-17 Negative Declaration No . 86-18 , applicant , William H. Wilson . We understand that legally the notification period is only five (5) working days , however , we repectfully request that a continuance of the hearing be granted so that we 11 may all arrange to be in attendance . Our objections center around the following points : 1 . Parkin -- in this area , there are already numerous apartments and the number of off,-street perking facilities are quickly used up with the overflow lining the cubs of both sides of the streets and even on the corner. We have our own example of this on Sandra Lee and Sits where R-2 units have been built . We would also request return of limited parking hours . 2 . Traffic and congestion - The density of the multiple housinq developing in the Huntington Harbor area has lead to ever-increasing traffic and congestion . With all the building of multiple housing units presently underway or just completed, we question what possible purpose additional units serve . 3. An alley has been proposed behind the eleven (11) units to be constructed . With the al) ey off of Orion be tween Sa ndra dra Lee and Sims , 'we know from experience the problems an ally causes and of the dangers to children and older adults alike . f Mr. Glen K. Godf ey April 250 1986 Page Two 4 . The Sunset Heights area has developed into a " neighborhood of well established single family residences, and the building of apartments with a transient population adds to the { pressu►e and unstability of the area . I Thank you for your consideration in this matter . Would you please notify those listed of the new date of the hearing . Sincerely, CC Mayor Robert Mandic City Council : Ruth Bailey Ruth Finley Jack Green Jack Kelly Don MacAllister Jack Thomas r � Planning. Commission : Frskin 9 Livengood Mirjahayir Porter Rowe Schumacher Winchell ` ,I ' II i t' ,t, _ T HOME OWNER ADDRESS ICA /11 A. � �i:. ♦iG LLG1.,,r'�G� �'�.'!l. i`f� �r �r �7t l�G.�, �'•♦ . _ / L J•r J r ..._,G !Z f Lit So,.,��,�, ,��c ems---•�- �./ � q-� t�i vt �- )�Lj_ vx 4, � /rC�r��.y:.. n� -4v��a> sr.0 ., +►...n -,..; ••'RYr !".• t w ... _ ..J �. -. ..._____—._.... A IJUKE OWNER AD.... D I Y zv jf�'!t'�i �aare� - /�/ !7�/ 1� t.�0'�/r'L�.+ ��'�C.� L�7 ♦ ,. .�rE"'�!. Cow i Uzo,tie AW _ 4 /1• SLu�i 15 , , .T H0�ER ADDRESS ef jr ou �f. w /Jl • '���C-lir-,?t�2.._...sue! .,� AL�'� ���,7��� ��' ?lCl% .�-���%�✓•_l�t.�.. � � � _.... _f.'_ 9 :2 e te 76 66 _ f�C, ;� t..� 'r � 1 ! �•-- 1� '�•'is�;,,I 't.�i� ti• � C i.�,,, /-f �� t c... /a l� � r s yV. .� 1. •A'� .Y , , ,.�,,•. � .. - -, ' ,-.. - __�... .. _ ... �...__--�i •}' '� r 1 lS ST i r Peter`M. Clark �. April 25, 1986 j Mr . Glen K. Godfrey, Secretary Board of Zoning Adjustments P. O. 190-92648 f Huntington Beach , CA 92648 r Dear Mr . Godfrey: s In regard to the hearing scheduled for Wednesday, April 36, 1986, for Petition/Document: Use permit No . 56-17 Negative Declaration No . 86-16, Applicant , William H. Wilson . As a property owner living across the street from { the proposed development, we wish to register our strong opposition of your approval of this project . The neighborhood presently has an abundance of ! ' apartment complexes which , unfortunately, add greatly to the parking and traffic congestion on Sandra Lee and Orion . No matter how many garage units seem to be legislated, there are always more tenant cars than space . We question the advisability of the proposed alley and the dangers it will create . We have a daily example of these safety problems with the alley on j Orion just east of Sandra Gee . The addition of more R-2 housing into an area that has become a fully developed R--1 neighborhood is 1 puzzling . The feeling and texture of the neighborhood has difficulties now mixing with the more transient apartment population and more units I will just contribute to these pressures, it seems environmental impact studies are required for major undertakings , however , your office - ii:dicated that this is a "small project" and , therefore , notification of the entire neighbo•rhord was not made . To the city of Huntington Beach this 1 may not be an important matters to our neighbors and t our!;elves , it is . Unfortunately, your notification came' only; a week before the hearing and we vill ''not be- able to attend to express our. concerns inperson. 1 Sincerely► ,.wwr Peter . and -Dot 6a Clark �< t NIM Peter Al [larw 171 21 Usrira Lte l.enc I04dolvar Mock'CA 12449 u � � ,ilk � �� fix• ;' j v�Z? �J� CGt,t,..•t� GL•!� (,,2,,..,.�, .� '�••t 4Gaa�"..�� /��'�-�aGG•� _(. ,�[ L `L►ti. ��.�.!-1.- rYIG* .��c.-3 w�J cw /" G%L,c.�� .•:-�lr,,E_ Lli.'sr�rw�.-v '�1 /�// % '�-C✓ l'L.�% !L 4 G ♦[� �1 ��yL�••1.. �k��tG L YYL.�-r�-G7 -�-f'l u-�y-yL.:t_.,•�• ,, G�� cr,f vt-v., e`.e �.�1 � .•r.��.• � LC rt.G-C.�c�.::-�t �•+--�"" `I� t+L` �� Tom:/L�-i f�G� � 4r•-•G�#•Lti!-�,r �i�yy..+[� r C! -'►s-d� l ol n ��� .��,��.. _ -�F G a_�' '!L')i a�t.�.-C� -�•cx-rti u-�j t'+(..,.t.ti- L��, j'--;L.fres.�.:� . -e' _�-�� L �s i �-- c.�_-.- ✓�J� l.c s+.r ' `/ Ci•X MM_ 00 +_�,7.y..y:.t_.-.. ;t-.'• �.c �- �-►� !; L.� r+'�-Cam-40 " � -s•(.t'•"�,.ara��.._✓(' �`�G�.':'"�'7�F+C,' �C. �.-, `..-L,i��[•C ��L 1;.-�1"`�-� .,r'GLa:-'1..w- G- �� /-•G-��-L t 1,... /�! elr'...G��-{r.-I�Y.Z.tC�' l�l^I t-1 t' r•�►;!-f"`-;�'" �iv ,t�i -. r�� `�'�-:�C �4-.J-�•� �1"�r 1. �../♦1.-C..t"7 ��..1.�, y�./Z.-• �+ y.�s.,j'• L'f 7'y.� • �•!�.♦ 40 416 4.1 fy.• C���•-c. J L t�� :4�-�?F;,L,�, ` i .c_G'.,t_-tr. �' r r ' t " , .fj i.G�l r�[�' ...,a:�/''� d►1 G�r�, ,r•..,.� M�� �r7/�.L ..Cl.-�.--......ate y1'►. a� G� } }. ..1i..� 2C--�C�llis t•t.G-c.._�` .L•.l. �: 4 ;,,`„f d.L,GLt.. � e-vy %-�'• 4 � • �•{ f _ t - srf . , -�•�- rf t �..� trG..�`••[rlc•�yy�c.�..w�. � - ��i•�'L- try-Q.•:�-�— • r `:c �y. 4../�)i{. 1� C1 .1. � _• 'r....t� �+-r�.�-tr.�`t��"�+ �L�-P li,,,� � , t, .�� 'is'� � cam_ g. to4 � � ♦f,, �.,G7 r• •l_ r v'�.�� rt.r�.,z.� "_ r.L�t•4.:1 `�.•.�! �LbrL.-'��r , �•• �� � Col ell � ` �/`a.(' .t- L����-s•-r,�ls, [�� �i.L a 1.G� t-+�- � +r;a•�it. • �...� �,••f..,,�r �-��--G � M .�'1 •y•�•4 G L'-Lr a, r. %s ,a t , , • ..,...ili1'�.�� -.:, ,_ .hqu.[4.ST��:�v w..R. •..... .•::i .; b1Y.i.+ri..�, '74►.� . -0 CONNOR ,tilailing Address: P.O,Box 4459/Long Mach, California 90804 2659 Myrtle Ave./Signal Hill, California 908(1611213) 42Ei•f3135 HUNTINGTON April. 428 , 1986 DEVELOPMENT SER BEACH ES r. w� ADR dos > Glen Godfrey Board of Zoning Adjustmentsi�ox A90 City of Huntington Beach Box 190-9�6a8 Hunting#on Beach, CA °2f8 �• C3 Dear Sir : This letter is to express my family ' s opinion against any adjustment in the zoning of the property involved in use permit #86- 17 . Recent years have brought a tremendous traffic increase to the intersection 1 o- "curve" of Marina View and Orion . Many cars traveling at relatively fast speeds up Warner , make "race course" type right turn on Los Patos and then a similar "race course" type fast ? eft on Marina View . Even without those shenanigans , the intersection at Orion and Marina View is for some reason conclusive to encouraging drivers to drift over the double line that the city recently (within the last two or three ,years ) painted there . Normal , non-speeding drivers drift over the line because of the configuration of that intersection and at the present tine , there is NEVER a car parked anywhere near the intersection . If there is an entrance or egress put within 100 feet of that curve , it will be probably the most dangerous intersection in Huntington Beach within •18 hours of the first tenants arrival . For your further consideration, this is a single family neighbor- hood . Admittedly, there are some multi-unit buildings nearby but if you make an on-site inspection , I think you ' ll agree this, is . not a neighborhood that would be well served by ;r. 11=unzt apart- sent . I ' am not sure but I believe the lot was changed from a single lot to two lots within the last few years . In the 13 years I ' ve lived in the neighborhood, there have been at least 3 multi -unit projects turned down. More' smaller -than 4 What ' s being requested now . . 4 - " 00 Sorie of those projects were turned down when there were'' 'only - S or 6 ho s in the neighborhood . Now the neighborhood is filled and to grant', this permit would not be, in the city' s best interest or, the citizens of the neighborhoo'.3 . , .F. As a foot 'note , I might add that I found out about this project from other concerned neighbors . I was not advised by the appli :ant and J live with. n S00 feet of the proposed complex . Sincerely, Wi 11iari Halpin WH . mg cc/Robert Franklin , Dept , of Development Services I i . ,• � , ,:: . , : xis r: Apr11 30, 1986 TO Board of Zoning Adjustments City of Runtington Beach, Ca. FROM: Ann Conway 17172 Farina View Place Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 ' Tel. (714) 840/7523 t i ' I hereby state my strong opposition to the construction of a multi-unit, rental development in an area surrounded by a custom-developed R-1 residential community OIL owners, not renters. Since 1972, I and my fellow neighbors have struggled with short-sighted developers to maintain a hOmO6eneous profile in this area - one of which the city has come to be ven, proud. } tDespite the fact that zoning made years and years ago may permit the consideration of a multi-residential rental project, its iipact on the neighborhood both from traffic congestion aspect and esthetically would have negative repercussions. It vould be a mistake to alloy►, the construction of a , 's rental properLV in an area ultere long-tern residents have built 1 lifetime hones with pride and caring. Ax elton ; 11 e 1 ♦ r, y F . S .a. •.+ ni , cv _ • 4 I r �. .:..�-,.....� . . . .mow. �iC•�/_.yr_.,._._C.�-4'_t�!.mac � --____..___..__�._�__------.._..__.�. _._____.__.._._ f� �ur�_f�isr•�.�-��jr c� f fps - - ram' .i j All- 40 rokr , ` ,.4�.Ltst7.i' ,�4Si�r .i M,lr >.t.+l.VR r;'.+x",) }C , i. „Ot""'"J -.,.—.a.....+!I MF'�!wwrr'T•►w+..... r, y ♦ 'j'" T s'f 'C"n"n..sr:cy� PETITION �j f In Support Of Use Permit No. - 86-17 Proposed Construction .of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Stree-z Huntington Beach, California We , the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington f Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board . of Zoning J 1 Adjustments of the Cite -A Huntin ton Beach , being Use .'Permit 9 9 No. 86-17, on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington Beach, California: . 1 r DATED: +� 1 % . r� .� / 19 8 ` (Resident) (Address ) DATED: 198E : - (Resident) �• ( Address,) , hL . DATED: 198. ,c (IResident bu _ R r0 S J r I i .. !f_ �^ ':. .. r e. ,'; .s. ': . ..tt �,>_ •'.,' t._�,.'H E"��Q'd.r 1F' ..-�.''x?.'"+ r�:X r PETITION In Support Of Use Permit No. 86--17 Proposes? Construction of an 11-Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach , California We, the undersigned , being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Bogrd of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Hunting'Zon Beach, being Use Permit No. 86-1.7 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington Beach, California : DATED: ..�� , 1986 : A (Resident ) ' r OY/ ( Address ) 11 � Q J'h ,, DATED: �1 �© O � 19 8�� . / L ' (Resident ) Dr. � �• (Address ) a ��f 1)ATED. 1- . 1986 : , (Resident) F' , - PETITION f In Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Froposed Construction of an 11 -Unit Apartment Project On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach, California We, the undersigned, being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction 'of an ll.--unit apartment project , as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City .:f Huntington Beach, being Use Permit No. 66-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the City of Huntington Beach, California : DATED : , 1986 : silent ) (Address ) OF DATED 1986 : &etf e- � Resident} J� Utr (Address ) GATED: , 1986s , (Resident. (Address � r PETITION Xn Support Of Use Permit No. 86-17 Proposed Construction of an 11-'Unit Apartment Project On Wanner Avenue at Orion Street Huntington Beach , California We, the undersigned , being residents of the City of Huntington Beach, California, de hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction of an 11-unit apartment project, as unanimously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use Permit No. 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Huntington Beach, California: r. t DATED: l 19 8 6 : Au"L� -ti-�--� ( Resident) (Address ) t AT ' : S 14 8 6 : D � .... (Resident) ( dress) • . r -(.Resident) r ress w • ; PETITION In Support Of Use Permit No . 86-17 Proposed Con.,truction of an 11 'Unit Apartment Project + ' On warner ' Avenue at Orion --Street t•; Huntington Beach, California We , the undersigned, being residents of the City of HuntIn' gton Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed cons ruction' .: of ,a e � `by t Boar 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously aPProv L• of Zoning Adjustments of the City of H-sirington Beach, , being U iie Pe'rini.t No . 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the City of Huntington,-. Beach, California : � 1 , DATED. •3 , 1986 . (Resident )"' q6-6 91�, `' ( Address ) / U_ DATED: 1986 ; y (,� (Resident / s. Ad r s s ) DATED. , 1986 . ( Resident) r61 . (Address r• r • PETITION =' In Support Of Use PP Permit .No. . 66-17 t � . - Proposed Const' ctio n o f an ll Unit Apartmerit 'Proiect On warner. Avenue. at Orion Street Huntington Beach, California We the undersigned , being residents of the City of . Hunting,... , h, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction .of an 11 unit apartment ro ect, as unanimousl approved b• project, � I Y PP Y the Baard ; of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach, being Use •Per' ini • t No . 86-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the City of Huntington Beach, California : DATED: 1986 • W ( Resident ) • GrG � � (Address ) DA TED: l986 . ( Resident ) r ° ! (Address ) 1 DA TED: 1986 : 0GSIdent) ress _ _. _ .. .... . .... r...1:...•f f. .•-^l t'f . ....i! I. .}1M •y 1� ♦ .. +_ _F'• is'f+7R?M•nr1.,. s•tir+..twr..+.-.., ._� „. -. '..- ”.--: r ,ems v.+•'•T a — r ' , .. ,' ,.. '. a , . - .r . •�r r r • PETITION In Support Of Use Permit "ENO. 86-17 Pro eyed Censtruct`ion of an 11 =Unit ':Apartment Proiect" � On Warner Avenue at Orion Street Beach, California Huntington a t� We , the undersi gr:edk being residents of the City of HuntinSton Beach, California , do hereby SUPPORT the proposed construction 'of,: unit an 11- a aztrnIient , unanimous ro ect , as • � P P j � l Y • approved by the 'Board ; 1 of Zoning Adjustments of the City of Huntington. HPaeh bein Use Permit . g errnit ' No . "86 17, on warner Avenue at Orion Street , in the .City City of Huntington ' Beach, California: �p '' 1986 ,DATED: ( � • : j (R sident). �70 l . (Address DATED : 196+5 (Res!Mt ) a, (Address ) RATED: . ...,� �_.. 1°6 6 : }` .�..." (Resident) r, A ress F r � 1•'S n'y f� a P�!� ��yh Nat+,!'i�f.�ll �L�1'u' tY:4�•»''��'t�+i1;� S : Ires : PE`t'ITION rn Support Of Use Permit tic'. 86 ' 1? ctConsructior, oPro Proposed f an 11 -Unit AaztmetProt Oit ' Warner Avenue at 'Orion Street t ington� Beach, California Hun We, the undersigned, being residents of the Cit Hun 7 y of tington Reach, California•, `do hereby SUPPORT the pro osed 'construction '-o, P f an 11-unit apartment project , as unanimously ' approve'd by the Board of Zoning 'Adjustments of the City of Huntington Beach , being Use -Permit , No . 86=-17 , on Warner Avenue at Orion Street, in the City of Hint `ingtvn Beach, California : DATED: .� , 19 8 6 : tY� 11.�. G,�-7-•� esident) �. I1,r M C Address DATED: 1986 : (Re eat) t.f (Addre : DATED:. RJ 19$6 : �.,�.. ... " (Fiesi.dent ) r .( Address) ,