Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Use Permit 86-25 - Code Amendment 86-30 - Barbar 1If' Autnorittld to Publlfh AdvWl194'+>M11 of las WnCWlAp pYOhC , noncis 13 of the superb k of Ofsng• County, Cnhlornisr akumtot A-6214 CUsd 29 Sootsmber, 1951, end *0 A-24331 aatod 1 t June, 1%3 STATE OF CALIF OANIA 1 I. .County of Orange •,..K ••.�.:. ..,«�:•.�. �..«.� •. ►� w•.ti • •w w ► aqr• 0.0 so Oct to%~-am% v • I am a Callen of the Untied Slates and a ,esidenl of the County alaore' said, I am over the age of eighteen s year's. and not a party to or interested in the below , �ioA- entilled mailer ! am a principal clerk of the Orange ;�, '' • ..MI��C~NOi10E , • Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is combi,ied the NEWS-PRESS• a newspaper of general circulation, rta�acHK /�� Jr printed and published �n the City of Costa Mesa. I� TOMA� �ivL a3 _ ✓ Of A C411111111011TWINAL ' i County of Orange. State of California. and that a PUBLIC HEARING ;`f� �{ u '- � �•rB�j NO1fCe `-- TCAR* 0 NOT4Ctl;,ai:'H[I1ESY 4 _ _ sown Coy COAMe� Put- of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete �r•r6�� .nt8WA' i copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa. 2�oo mom- Mtrrt .'tuu- 1rgtm a+eck Caww t.an Newport Reach, Huntington Bench, Fountain Valley, a"q 13$ d'r'""�"' ollatt e�d wiotj ar«lWw.na Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna ,,IO0AWs ,,,a, w""rabe ONE TIME N ad ivft%"r to ��' Beach issues of said newspaper for ,01 ,0 dbi'm . DATConsecutive weeks to volt the issuo(s) of 1M1 �ond'r it, i rW&.i:o o.m. :, ; AFP'I,: 7W" "UMBER i 'C 041ftemal UP" PW"w fi0. IOCJITKft MA42.Arpo f 7�zly @ 198 6 l ►Rslat.• f1t flow omwiv 1 ---�, -- • AMIftOnlilr 01latet� mopoSA{.;: Or. ...-. 19 8 1.'!1!a rr0e ramrl►d�rr� Nana of up to 12 oddro%In ett�s+wtxq �M Ioftlltr, -•--. "198__ NORM.:.• G .�+fENVI t;O1NMEkT'J1L•' . �3TA't4'A:;CaapotlrMp etc . 198 a1lui"GMelivotoeltrploviiiia E�tWOuW at 'Co.. 198 I w '°w d:pawWpt�w11 >1l0�4 taro h'iAltr!b.Ms•rMl ��. ow>E AtirMta s rind i I declare, under penalty of Aerjury, that the +v ».a*ibm a OWN ; loregding is truef and correct. 0 a ".� r' otlNorr.�e�f+RMs.°��M+:�raf�pdp�r- ;�.�, . • as►pMMr�M�w.;. ,�� lire os ANrrtr'�t11e t�flir�.of Executed on July 8 , 19s 6 , 'At C~ to Mesa, C litcrnia. w�ira�t 111iACll Signature 1"Vvt OWN* 00W P ■t J*9, 1e., MORRISON & F'ORRSTSH oat ,and',Cit May y Council Members City of Huntington Beach July 21, 1996 Page 3 Ms . Leonard' s petition solely because he was a friend of Mr, and Mrs . Brusewitz. On April 1",. 1985 ,'. Barbara Leonard'; appeared before the City Council with, petitions .from 23 Orange County Day Care. Associationmembers and 33 'neighbors ': and parents, and six . letters of support. , Mr. Brusewitz :oppo,sed„ her by pre - renting .the same petition that he had presented during.,,the Coaanission hearing, as well ,ab, the testimony of one neighbor who complained of noise in genera];. The City Council voted five to ze'ro "to deny the permit with one abstention anti one absence. Since the",Council hearing, . Ms. ;:Leonard and her hus- band have constructed a six-foot cement block wall,.to ,flower the n(:ise level . , Since July 1985, wht t home has been at : its cauacit 'of six. ch1ldren. Ms Lecnat,d h 's been re0eiv1n an average c ..' 'tUiee calls per week from parent::­ seeking day care. ME Leonard has been forced to refuse interviews with prospectwe parents since her day care home is operating at her current licensed capacity. Ms. LeonardnraNised� a iiBua that vith then'automAticf ubZnael . p c hear- { � , . '^.,- e,:Code, dial not" comply, with Cy ing as required fired alfi�� althuntland Safety hCode�Secton lS9?.4h et sag an opinion which is supported b1 Carol Stevenson, Staff Attorney, Child 'Care Law Center, who worked closely with the staff of Senator Watson In drafting that legislation. on May 8, 1986`,, Ms . Leonard submitted- a permit L. ' application, for, the permit nc.A at issue, CUP 86=25 She did not request a pub'.ic hearing. On May D ; 14, 1985 Abby Liebman, • r rrectinq Attorney, ,Community; Pro,gxams ,i£ Public Counsel,; rote _to Lisa Curran of the Department" of Development Sera- 116es to emphasize that, the application, of Huntington-.Beach,: ordinance Code, Article ' 933, was inconsistent with the Public i policies reflected in the state legislation. On` May .22 , 1986, Public Counsel received,' a reply from James ;W. Palin, Deve' opment Sezvirces .Cozpo- . 1f rat� :r skating his �:osita'on that: t i ) Ms'. 'Leonard''B. opera • heer'in , as t�.on is a ..day care fei�ilt requiring . a pub.l3a q,' Frith my CUP, and (2 that the 100 foot notice,`provision Aim xsox ]FOURSTR Mayor ,and City Council Members City of Nuntingtcn Beach July 21, 1906 Page 4 of the state statute is a minimum requirement, expandable to } 300 feet. I I on June 17, the Commission held a hearing on CUP ,86-25 . The evidence presented h%a the bearing.:in :sui pport P ,9, Epp p. Y lion ;staff of to -rin 1 i .. ~tion was . ( 1 ) are report b the Commas recom .r•,ain approval of the use on the basis of no adverse e£fec, an noise and traffic conditions; (2 ) the ,opinion :of an attorne from m morrison & Foerster that a .,day care., ;&ome is different from a day care center; (3 ) testimony on�ie short- age, and need for adequate, safe, and effective day care; (4) testimony of mothers currently using Ms . Leonard' s ,home that her home was reliable, effective, and safe; ( 5) peti- tions and testimony cf neighbors in support; and ( 6 ) reports of, Ms. Leonard's efforts to reduce the noise levelby build- in g a wall;: adopting out her pet r;og, constantly rescheduling traffic,. aid keeping the children q•aiet. The evidence Pr•e from neigh bors in pposition to `:the permik%, W)nsisted> of three letters ors stating that traffic and noise caused by„the day". care home would be unacceptable, a petition containing signatures from some homeowners outside the 300 foot radius, and the testimony of three homeowners . The permit was denied. I LEGAL ANALYSIS : I The statute governing day rare home in the state of California,. is contained in Cal . Health and. Safety Code . Section 1596 .70 et a,�e It should be noted that under the state statute the term "chi ld day cure facility, " is a. broad term denoting "a facility Which' provides non-medical "care, to children under 18 years,, of age in need of personal.. servicesi supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the acti- vities of daily living or for the proteCti.on of the indi,ridual on less than a 24-hour basis . The child day care .fac:ility, includes day..:-Care-centers and family day care homes. " Cal. Health and Safety Code, Sec' `un 1596 A day rare center is specifically not a familly day care,,home, as it includes infant centers, pre-school, and extended day ceire facilities. Section 1596 .36. Rather, a, "family day; "care,.Ihome".,: is,. a home which regularly provides ; care, protection, and supervie1.on of 12 or fewer childrf;n in the provider' s own home, duxing,'the day, While parents„ or guardians are away. The difference between a large a.&a a small family day caT,e home',. is that ;the small home provides . ;are .to six or , fewer children, ..while',the large services sevem to 'Lwelve children. Section 1596. 78 . '__- .s- r — .. _: �^^ '.a:iV J`.....«wa ,_..r'i' ,, .--.... ,;.'.5:. ....'++�a'::..1.,w,fl s..r...a ,. . _ rr�+w ++► a ►/r�1rlTlakftM' �C'.".f%.Y, MORRISON & F©ERSTSIR Mayor and City Council Members City of Huntington Beach July 21, 1986 Page 5 Chapter 3 . 6 of the statute, entitled "Family Hay Care Homes, " concerns the licensing of family day care homes not centers . The legislative findings accompanying that chapter set forth the reasons why the legislature adapted the statute % (a) The state has a responsibility to ensure the health and safety of children in family homes that provide day care; (b) That there are insufficient: numbers of regulated family day care homes in California; (c) That there: will be a growing need for child day care facilities due to the increase in working parents; I ' (d) That many parents prefer child day care located in their neighborhoods in family homes; (e) That there should be a variety of child care settings, including regulated family day care homes , as suitable alternatives for parents; (f) That the program to be operated by the state should be cost effective, streamlined, and simple to administer in order to ensure adequate care for children placed In family day care homes , while not placing undue burdens on the providers; and (g) That the state should maintain an efficient program of regulating family day care homes that insures the provi- sion of adequate protection, supervision, and guidance to children in their homes . The chapter establishes three options for a city to choose from 'ir.,`in lementin p g these goals. The options are as follows (1) to classify the homes as permitted uses of resi- dential property, (2 ) to grant a non-discretionary permit to use a lot zone for a single family dwelling; or (3 ) to require that arty large family day care home must apply for a CUP. since Huntington Beach has not specifically adopted r: elther of the first two options, and since it has required Ms . Leonard to obtain a CUP, it must be assumed that Huntington Beach has adopted the third option which requires ;r. A10RRISO-N & FoLRSTBR Mayor and City Council Members City of Huntington Beach July 21, 1986 Page 6 applicants to obtain a CUP. Under Article 933 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, procedures for obtaining a CUP for a day care center and nursery require the notifica- tion of neighbors within a 300 feet radius and a mandatory public hearing prior to Commission action on a CUr . What Huntington Beach has failed to account for in requiring Ms . Leonard to follow its standard procedures for obtaining a CUP , is that the state statute does not call for a standard CUP. In contrast to the Ordinance Code, the state statute requires that the CUP be reviewed and granted by the zoning administrator or persons designated by the planning agency . Furthermore, the statute doen not permit local. governments to exercise discretion as to whether to grant the CUP when "the large family clay care home complies with local ordinances, if any, prescribing reasonable standards, restrictions, and requirements concerning spacing and concentration, traffic control, parking, and noise control relating to such homes . " The statute further states that any noise standard shall be consistent with local noise ordinances implementing the noise element of the general plan and shall take into consideration the noise levels generated by children. In addition the sec- tion requires the local government "to process any required permit as economically as possible. " To reduce the cost of the hearing the city official must send notice to owners within a 100foot radius, not 300 feet. Additionally, the statute forbids a hearing on the CUP "unless a hearingis requested b an applicant or other affected " 9u Y hP person. None of these state law provisions were followed when the Commission automatically applied Article 933 . Indeed, many of them were violated. The decision to grant or deny was, not made by the zoning -administrator or another person designated by the agency. Moreover, the Commission scheduled an automatic hearing even though no affected person had requested it. Notice was sent to people Within a 300 foot radius, not 100 feet. At the hearing, the Commission focused on neighbor' s complaints rather than the objective standards listed in the statute. Finally, the procedure required by Huntington Beach was considerably ,more costly to the applicant than anticipated by the legislation. In this case, there can be no question that Ms . Leonard meets the statutory requirements of the Health .L - �iC�R1tIBON & FOR, Jt8TSR Mayor and City. Counc:.l Members City of Huntington Beach July, 21., 1986 Page 7 and Safety Code. The noise generated by this facility in no ray would dxceed the bounds of noise levels allows ble in the residential area. Furthermore, measures such as an assist- ant will help keep the noise at comfortable levels. The :legislature did not intend that a day care home such as Ms. Leonard' s be prohibited inerely because of the complaints of a few disgruntled neighbors. Under such circumstances, the City Council should not permit the Commission's decision to stand, but rather should grant Ms. Leonard's CUP. Sincerely, lo Alice C. Hill for MORRISON & FOERSTER i ACE/od i .. cc: Ms . Barbara Leonard a , �. F'41 ...i.l.t 4tY fS .•..._.4�'1�*3jiM f. ,� ,T 1 k1:4`.l zl ,.,. �s . 1- ,.- %. a ... tit . e� s ,1 r t ...... _..t 1� :uz t1�,yfF x F3s /' ...r....�.� _ �!` 'C, , ,t ":' �. , , r ': ;,y ti.{- , r �!!+- 1 ! • r ! •i; r' • w. y'•tiry�y t•rs ♦irJ r1 ) i it=l, n. �t :;i .�7 Jar r •, ':R +'• r v,xit ' Stiy �i ,t`r�4'4. " ,t� P i` y.,i� 1-yJ ,-y.r.Z r ! rrS Jt�: jiF 1f h.i.t�^.. .i' •.T ( °• JI a _ I t 5 .7" , �'� 7 J" k, ,•y ,. '.� ,,n^,, , 1' - y?s.lid r •J.'; t.. ty } 1 f. viYI1. rt,•• , :, t; R l Si .J Fr r..�•sv 'r•r,r• f��.�4`�' X14 • .�..- sr !,{„ir , trs ii • A..,•r j� . r I J! ' !' ,'�.Js+,y���'I�fYN7'+`}��.�•!.''j. .lad;s r t r4s;l�V ♦ •,y � _ ,• � tr .,+ s / , i T , * S • `' NUM�IwGi'0!1 � � +�f A �• � Y, f,J .. i r yi e L l s s + I- /' ,r• 1 D 1tL AEy. ! . C s r z ! _ .r• ��y;fir r JN tt a,. a i J N r '. 1 -.) r _ t. .7 Y .., t '• t J 1 1` / Pt / j 985 A Y �/ •�i J� t .r ,Jt.LT 1 -..tK.,_..1.�• t ti' r ..F ! 1,� ` 1 t i �1���'T��jyA���{.tTSt�.�'-'r ` i r:,iil t 1 J. ,_!' r7i T , I}ear• Plidiiing Canemiss iaiier: P. , � r.• c ' .' 1r ! ! >yt }� s '•t �'_stf r •'r.k• t ) tiM1 Y.J•U ,r„a If � r ! c J' 'HIiR4A �� � � :x J 1 ° ' ' Ne oppose gtaiiting� a Cotidit aW Use` Pe' it at 172G2 Argo Circle because of noise, traffic and de Aining' property value.: The noise factor is di ;eruptive;_with the existing` six •children sand 'the; ,� he s level of. noise ame whether they are in"the enclosted patio playroom or in the back rgrd. - the main reason",We purchased homes on a cul 'de saci,,was because ,there. is usually :little ;or*no; traffic on a_ cul de 'sac..,HO ever, if a permit is f; a g ,, t wice 'a day . for; a total of 'twenty-four ca.. trips d .a • d; there would, be six more cars com3.ydown, our street tB one,granted n e } p ail enerated from• thi residence alone. We are also concerned that: a ,large family dap care fa cility would -hinder . , _ , , , .. . 1.- eur. property,value. We would not have purchased our homes eight and fifteen years ago had there been a lag day care facili'ty 'in operation at that ti me. - r street does not lend itself to a , We fee�l� ours .largefamily'daycare center. riP homes are small,, e'specially.a singlellevel such as the' one. in. question.. ' We think a large business 'of any kind isl inappropriate in a .low density residential Area such as this. We would very much like to keep our street o£ single !�± rS P g family. hoi;iea strictly residential. ' Sincerely, - • Mr. and sirs. Jeff.. ?turray _ `, .. ) }a f Mr. and Mrs. Ray McClintock • _ ,r t a •. , '. . 1, • { , J'. J.:+iF; .. .7_ r__ _ . t f .t .. '{ �`4,' 1ir ylli i1•,!, i•�etr_.:z,s . , ,;..!.t�+4• .r::.., . r!i;. � f .) .»� ^"aw..'.i i•.v.A.>••.r.,.+: •r•�^•�,, ar nt•w..• 7. r•r� -».r i ,.• 7 - ..�,,.... y..,`.. r' .1i' „'.} .t?1 r.�..4t K ;' rJ4 {•: ri•r.�.'a-:1. ♦`. <:M1 w.�. (r,..: ► a...•..'v jV.ra•r Y"+L1.: ♦-`l,.k ..•.�_� , }+1•,h _` ,•,` F ,'rji. 1 i,',•l 1101•i •.T- .v - itro+ ,1.Y,• 7 ,.. ;ir (.?7�4 wrl: j:, .fir' c{ '.. •ty.•1y_. .i'l...fa:.Y ', �. r.� A +c. „r, '.It ; � 'i .•t^M1 ar.,.! 1+[.^., ate•', .•r .i1; t 4'� �. • ,5,1`,. +'> M1,��;!t et.•�( s• �r�M ••sue, Y•.•i r�:-`1•S�.r I,,:.L ' .f;�i r-,+�"lP.!^.r!-*;,�x.aJl��. .:;y. t �'" ,' '', '''•• •/ vl ..+i•. 1 ., . �.7 „l,;:i,.+{ ., 1'�„rqq�vC r ,:,t1+, f^t !../ }r' :+ttj ,. ,� �,�.:L. , T t i�•; t� •� " • .. -- r f.r d.;Y + ?i:;. !r• �,• mr ♦ t t" r • ;Y!, 1'1�ti.:r +I.^l. A� '! [• ,�-.rr...,.i�r�f, *;y•� ,. •�Y •�♦ .. , 1f L:: ,: � ry y,i t 1.. Y ] H.' .,.� tY .1 ♦ r ~• ` L .. _•. �ti :',.' r e ! ",, ,r tf,' f(. Co k,I- •t-',!K �;'a it T'rd."',,.j`,iS+ <tir ,*, .r $ .r� /' w, r t .t}. '• •" ;, . "•. J , ..t , ',i ., '! a''t I .� r •rr+a'i KK ..� _ .. .. , . . ., �EVEL.i�`��1li1ENT SERVICES �. ,`� i • � •$' t 't t `i, 1 , ,' t ,.1,. �'�/+ ,'.r7 rr"; ' • �' 1 i el` t . I F 7 . '1 , i ,.:i;"•i` + '.. `P. 615-;86,-. ` 4 :;,and Mr'a` '.J Bo f - J �1H 7 ...M1- ;,,.., ,'k' ,:.•. r' :,. -..,,, I h ..<� t .-+. S XI. •�V t. ,t.: �•r 'C 'r.". ' ti Sr.,�i.•,- '.. •:C �' � �'�' t• .4 ,r 1 7 i S' 17221'Argo YO ` • CAL (d `` a *}1 y. ?C d .��•. r� i Y .C'. `I•' ;<,�114r L� f "►yS✓'I,i �j '+ � �� Ri, ' '+ M1y yy �i g..J: ,. s,•�.;r'�i ♦'.L.NKkJ r Diiir Sira s" Y_. ,�rf�,,w,:r.�..�01� 190 t *=: Nuntinston .beach";- CA=,92647 ,; • •.:. ,*1 ltaSe'C'!L�'♦t11'''t •; .' ,J ; Y �jY r i � i1 [* stit .l f]s Fi4 �� ► �{„ WIY �,� � +.x''.�`,r.' rC.l:" 4`t •"t f , ,* " � 't • a .mot 3 ai it •r r .t 'M'� - .fie f ,, ► f s r�; � '� �' 1.,� ,,. ,.,: I ,a•i�, ^• }fir','• ,}',!� r"u'M.r " ,i ;+-. Yt4�" , ..; 7,...; � s...+n; �' io' tit ` f Ib , ,r . ' we are, itin hiss 2t i wr t letter' oppoait to a pa io filed r ..,p. •.v"rl.r(f�`•l.rk-, +:�7 r . �'t. Barbara.I,eonard '''wha re at '17z42 Az o Circle, to o en, a' da i scare is 6 P Y ; center tc -12 children' r. , 1 `' .Y�''� Y,'•' ,fir �J ' _t .a.' } r,L,n y.{r`,,r ,•:. 3' tr 1-t r 1,�:a ' y - iYl � � We object to• this 'petition on 'the,;grounds, that exisiing.,eonditions' in' the 6 'nei`� or hbhoo'd_ are. such that, adding-additional `day care chiitlien,,-whether - shifts.'' a-one_day, shift`'b'asis, could' cause intolerable stress it be in, txo to an .already overstressed"situation. At'present we have 3 -h6me businesses operating.,,on our street, one of �rhich belongsta Mrs. l.eanard. The other .2 are';at another address and ' .ifig. U additional,', i U. . _. _ y . .,-e 'I •- bran 5 to 1 ,. . , , several trips; by UPS delivery trucks and occasionallyda semitruck$and trailer. In addition to,t'hia '•traffic we have the usual resident traffic and Mrs. `Leonazdlls day care traffic. P. Th ere aie only 13 homes on our street with approximately 28 resident owned vehicles. The are 19' small children and teen• alters living here,' nat including the • re day care children. We ,are ai o blessed with. .a practicing rock. and' roll band 'and 12 to `15 of the usual dv s, and cats that o�ulate a neighborhood ' all 'addin to g p16 the noise and confusion. -, We are not doubting that Mrs. Leonard's heart isfm the right place as , she assured us last. �ea* she & S•. v, was not doin this for the money but rather 1, for her. love of children* We do feel; howevers that she -has ignored. `inpherehomeotaskinfrom the to extend j;hb.ois' to ourselves �ycrease •.the numLc:r of children - r g e'n further by allowing more traffic through the cut de sac each day. When: .purchased r home 15 ►ears 'ate we paid more money for the advantage of living on a quiet cul de sac. We now feel that` with increased traffic frbm these businesses and an increase; in Mrs'. Leonard'a business' that`'our property„values are in' -jeopiardy, our, peacc and''quiet is .threatened. and • a safe play environment for our children `is lost. 4 J�1 ti trCl .:5 J ,Y7 ,,. .t t L1 , 1J,•._ �ef� .J + -' , je _ '♦ .,tea,(i. •? h,, i IrJI{��"-n;l x �•l,i{ •1 ��s .l .i.l`.�:.r l^\k .,'yG«LLi7Mi1.4.:• C.-.� ': 7'O�i • We• also ffeel'} that's it.,is an''insult and a,:burden:•to` have'tao ,pursue .thin •battle r+ - r rr. ■w..rrrrr.■..r...■r.+.+...rr■rrrw.�r� each`,vearx4ith new letters'.andmore<trips-to tree Councilt Meetings. We have ter-— w w r ,.rwr r+.�•r�. ■ it ...�rwr.■....�rwr -;'•..• eriod `of; time `foie re '�eti aiiin on "the art of Mrs. nard�eztendin�' the no intention of. ebanging ,our' stand on this issue and would t g p Leo g.to several 'years rather each year as it is now. The constant,rn scant letter writing" - threats and petitions on the part of Mrs. Leonard are hancyina. It has also .come, to our attentin that Mra. I:eonard 'has submitted to the, Council petitions. that are. copies` from :•last -Year and 'is trying po►•present , I • �i■i��Y ■� Y■�.wM r�■A�rw� them as nek petitions: Many of the eo le who ai6ned her,'petition Lafir, dear no longer live in' this neighborhood: ' t ,r Sincerely : ' and Mrs. Jack' Bottryer. 11 1 ' ♦ ..' • " ''7 �er '.' .. . 1,`.', r. ,7 .. a ... ',( " :1 !' M.t�� t',•1l elr t.'� ' a47 l.N,`-;,Y�11 } T.•`:.i Al+ ',.• y 1' ,1 ,e. t• � h t 17 t .7, ,!• ya +y... I ,r.r, i. `n '� •, a• . ?.... �' F.•'i?}'/'Cta 'Ns-„ ,. .Ii, . ..,I tart :'f` ( :i r r. .. `M1 J.:1'+ ,w __ :�1 j; r.1,�ttt.. �;r.•.o1i..f,,y/q{:1 {.''�„?.' ♦ y _ t � 1` r� �'tr'r�4t_2 l , .;fit c(lt •+ ` I`+ HUNTIMGTON LEACH r p VELOPI1ENT SERVICES Jiine 1S , '1986 �. . JUN'�'fi�1�i(i • i�untin�txriexch CA 92ii4t P1`anning u Commission ingto nL `. n•:; Beach Civic Center 2000 `-Mai -- : Huntington ' Beach, California Subject : �cona�ti $a�=.Us.tPitiatN86.=Z5�` Commission Afembers Conditional 'use permits' do :break down th'e ante' rit o sin' le • oods One �on`di tionalyuse` pe $ •f:imily residential nezghborh " ���' • , rmt s used as justification fora secon`d' 'or third 'conditional 'use -. • s p •P permit', an'&. has bee':1 used ` for th'i� ur ose in this " case . Several . • 1 P cation ` foryarianceS andabothnareuused�asxtustl flc�ed �as ' ustxfz , point is that the best way to-maintain s of. zoning. changes . �iy j txon or p .h grity,. of the t e ,,a.nte single :family residenO al neighborhood, in this -community or : any `,. othpr community is Eby riot allowing conditional "use permits .'in '_an established neighborhood. The system becoie' s. a progressive neighborhood disease , ;Th!i is ;a ood 'nei hborhno the B g d in' which 'the'', owners ~take pride in ' r. homes and are im rovin acid 'u, B , continuin a g !up-grad�.n :them on : a . 1 b basis . As a home owner in this cammuniLy I expect ��the zoning set by the city ,'to be up-held and prevent the , • deteriation of property values . I: am enclosing some photogra hs 'of. day-care centers including the', existing one In our nesg borhood , . ,This home 'has an addition: with a secondar ► entry • ' -} 3 , y. (marked which ca'n be easily b ' f course .-lega3ly this .would converted to . a .second liv.n unit 0 h`atie: to be 'done with : city apPro� al but with exterior work., completed (Kith. permit) the interior could be changed without # anyones knowledge . Since re ly Ja es W ea ' 17251 Argo Circle Huntington Beach , California 92G�l7 [ �f��.. .\.. i 'r'\i ir ,+',t;1\;y4i± ,•M, r _— t*n n-{ 1 _1_ _ -- — - __t:. —_ .. .. ' '1 T 4 1"n ZOctob er., .,25985` T� Nei ghbor,'. This Is to confirm your recie -P't of 'risy letter ­to you dated'."Septem' b'ex 21; 1985. In tha.t letter _r 'extended '* fbiendship as a­'good y will in' ' ' es o correct 6 expressed -a gn - , j�y problem neikhbbr and ' Day my-'D Care Home may . cause you 1 must assume there are no basis for, any, a com�1 '­iftts fkom you, a's you haven't demonstrated any need to respond to my correspondence to you.' Once again, I 'm offering, my address and phofie­nu"m' ber for our c'onvie'nce should you have an complaints tha' t I can take care of. n c e e 1:. 71a_..bar� '..%onard 17242 Ar;r0 Cr. ' 84?-0952 This letter mas sent certified .mail ' to the re.-maining four neighbor's on Taaurus Lane as the,; didn' t respond to my first letter to them. I received no resncnse "A"ron, three of the neighbors. 1 :,did receive . a phone call From Jain3rusewitz. She stated to me that .the children4ere ho' -., qxces'siviy loud, no yelling or screaming bu .: tha (6- she heardthe childien ' s voices and she didn' t -like that. .The 'other titre.. neighbors ,didn t app'pa" r. to' hai e . a problem as th6y`%�veie . price .4ven the ',6ppoT,tunilty to respond and did ;not. Mrs. Brusewit,z complaint about hearing children' s voices in a residen'tial neighborhood 'is far 'less sev'.er' e than Mr. Brusewitz testim' ony at all e mm Pr"or Co ' issidn or 'Council 'h 'arinas. "�_0- i September 2�. , 1985 Dear Neighbor; , 1 learned a ':very expens,[%.a le9sfon 'wheen I was denied the ° aermit I needed ,to increase the ..number of,, children _ I care for:. in m home., At ;the 'same time I ,learned that the children' s noise bothered''you` 'completely, unaware, 'of .this 'r n , the Future . I real y ' � , Y. 1 would appreciate it ff. ou know when there -is ' a'. problem. If I'm not aware of a problemo�Iacan�t e ` correct it Since the.'.;hearing,,,I have ',tryed my best. to :'keep the chil'dren-'a. noise level.,,',down ' .; .yp p d ships : on o theta. I_ m not 'the t e o f er eon to create 'hard Due . to a .physical condition, I was forced.' out of the job market. I• do,, nee,d.,to make a m:living and I love the little 'ones (ages infant's to I need' eed., to ' know :frgaod ,with them. � years old , and I om you if the noise level has lm'proved and if not, I need to '.know that also . I really would like to talk to you. I've thought . of stopping by to 'talk with you , but an :unfriendly welcome wouldbother me. Y! ve thoughtof inviting those 'of you who are concerned,, over on a Sunday afternoon for coffee and pizza , but if 'no one, were to' show; up,: I'. d be eatinisituationzxbutor a I don�tkthnktrthatswouldug t of .'doing, nothing about the help any of us. I need your help and I'm asking � t n you, of she three thouwhts above, Which would suite you best? Jould I be welcome Ili ' core to your home to talk to you? If so` When Wouldbe a good day and time? .1oulo you 1i.1le to 'cone to n. y home for coffee and donu -s .vi ,h a fe-a of yoi r ne?zhbors on Taurus Lane , see the children ' a playroo.^� and ,yard and Walk this over? Ir so ,what would be a good day or time for you? ? am trying, ti�rould you PLEA3.31 stop by or phone me at 8k7-9952 and le -4 snow, as I am concerned . Thank you. Sincerely, 3-arbara and n'Iichael Leonard 17242 Argo Circle Huntington Beach; , A;tcopv of• this letter wa s sent to each of the ne�,ghborg 9Qe: the ahaded ,area ; on ,the attached map) I; recie ved nca written response from an a these neig b� or eS Ixeceived aPhon „ call ;XrOm Helen Dtonne. She 'told me that my day care children were no longer a "Problem for her but that my dogs barking bothered her. I adopted the family dog out. ' t 1 1 �� .a':IiI V�R� {ttrtd��Y11111�• _. M�I 1 ..,... ,, �..;.. ;.. t�rulia I�f��w cMl chili w.itt tMoirrnt It1Ms�rd ft+wMt �'� �.r►r,.�.•'s.a1,•�'h. r_-. IiEMOEi� No"1 Z ?•�/4 � .SIR em ' t;•+riwlr lNlf{ilslwX%wL.AvMV etie W-f1vk tb0a<{�11 ' ;* t+sv do trif•w1M or+�rt tfitl•t wa M{n r "meow d1w mom t .�• ' cArn•uto pmsi rmst•+to t"nra dr+ck hour{N• H ? t .. ,a � � ' rnitoMN r'diMMl•d�. • 'r i.. t �i1itU!D rAild111.diiA� Iddtfs ;a. a 9 t 9. Ardde Addro•med to: PA I So of rc ......,.,� Hun�ta.ngtonP egG $ Rid R I�tr�wnd ` �•/-con a . TYpe of Swvia' Arlkio"w"t lr c, Alwr" -.. t�w1 ,dared e vl oetrin IJ tun of a rid rratdt�Ap"and~' '� y t;,r t coo,; ': a E -IT MAobtains to of add' :rvjx genttend Q8TE gELI,,� VEREa.a d.%slp%ftro— A ;r, •►" • ,,'•t-.. r. t' n— :+fit'. 11�ii�� ,� '<x .1ys.' ,it c,�,,r..rA► ' ....Vl•!• , ..r ' � .°'4 ;T'�2 81985«a ,.t�-�:.:'�s�► �`;::` L9t( e'i .r �+.+...w rra'Vti '.''.����,.�-��t,.,��f �n,•`1 j1{�.'1f..•,/� t r • � 1�.�1A,>f1'ln:''N��f�.t{'+I�•.l:w.`.1F..'�i�lfal�;�t�;!�r r' ,: r t •: r' �' ! r , /�/ • �i. .�� .... �,•'+1, `7��'.�r�♦��� ►��yjS ;1 .I� t l �• •M 1 �' O�••'•�'ir �~ ~ i•I'�'1�: — j.*f Z} yii. . !.�':�4 L^. �.t , �;•�" �. i, r i. �.• �r �. A��l�� >� SENDER: Co qjm Items 1.2.3 and 4. Ple -A - ;': qu tlt�rwtt�ai-tiri dNtv�rrid to and th11 deri cf Put Dual ast(r~th•"RETURN TO". Wc•on tffi �:'t t�• fOr WQldO Mra followhty""ices' �i r FOIIUtoto do this will pr•vn1 MhcaNrd tTOr91 "' ;.� v nd chock bol• 1 o va+be—no r►M.1+0riimn•c'tlo t vhoe up.•1►sMan r run rr2 t Wr onttpotatww for towe t«wN!awtu±ctldtdolivovdtoAnath• s +t ? .. T fa�•.rrktlll rOW49tod ." `"Nay.For•dditfort•t twa tn•roNowlnp f+rrvicM ers 'r iShow tour daa•txt oddnrw of d•Ih►•ry. ;avattnWa.t•.on>,ult t�os�nattsr to NO•tfd chock box(IS) � e •e; for wrvk*j)re"Uted. t• ��,�', ' 2. a Ravicted DSIWV. ew to whom,lots and wider of d M" 3 =: 3. Artist.Amr.. d W. g `<2. ❑ R•sttkt�cl t}alt+rsslr. . �`i J` Mott .rdr . . David 5ando r Articlo Addrarodto:ruseAtZ1-•ti •Y�tsw 1 2 21 Taurus17241 Taurus r Huntington Beach , Ca . Hunt . ' Bch� Calif►L926�+7. "'••�' i i, ♦wry ArtkM � t ��•a I 't 4•` 1Tr Nafnbw '. ' '.•r ia. ��l�'t.��1' ili+c•✓� 1�r1.` r+ ti� ' , ,� 'r;r,rh.,,.tia.u=a;•K �' •�.tdi9 , p X to•Carttfied COD P177 751 530• � a f�.of Sore+e• ' -• ARitlaNumbw,: • p Reptste:red ' x 1 land _ }� ,T,ettihod .r1�CJ CORM �tp� i� �• 1 I ri tf of addrtlaet� Ex rent MeN„ >t .. .1= ';otttai liptaftl ,, �Alwtl P D _ VE EIS ..,... ;�, a ��..,,,• ,...;:.w•,. �',.,y AL : s• r 1 AlwsY nM un of addtetaaQC ,��pp�� y ' f ��11/ w.. r•;•. . t •�� C�)V f:�. •fT.•/.'•tr rr'W�..r'�LA/.+.+r a, bra•,•Ageit ,. . - 1� v t 1, .%T:�11��7T.�{.i:• .i.iIIN � e i j 0. fit t4" •-AVmt ..li .'•.4.4:a� t y' iry f411 Divroaf Dow" 6 .� 8. Addovem'e Addrovs(ONLY ffPSOMMM ttr� .r . „ t • ,Z 1• s j', .,.ar,.;.. wr..i-•t':'I•.�t•'wq,a.. e,►t..•wMdlT��-•,••7r �.1..� 1 / .; • 41'rr` , , fit. 12 . ahesub3 k property sfiA'1"S enEex. nto irrevocable kreprocal ' riv eway a Bement between the subject site and adj ent corner ' lot at Beac and MacDonald. et dedica stye tions are required on MacDonald and Holt. 13 . Five feet wide 14 . Remove and replac , ;. .c improvements a y p publi _ � a • equir�ed b Publi`c Works Department . 15. Ohese water facilit `s Cif re wired ) shall to dedicated ' to 9 City. 16 . Another stairway is , .ho be ins talle on the south side'�of . th'e complex near the lobby are Trt stairway ,will ' replace ,'the , need to . provide. a .,,cl ea r-to- a access'; lane of 24 di P p y,. nimum: fir feet on the west side of the , ldi.ny .com lex Th'is:: 8dditional stairway will also satisfy th requirement to -provide stairways for locating standpipes wit n 00 feet of travel from any unit. , P Y 9 17. Automatics rinkler s ste s steal be installed ,thrpu bout pursuant to Huntington Bach Fire, epartment and National Fire Protection Association amphlet 13 'tandards. f 18. A 1.7 foot by 45 foot urning radius w 11 be re qu i red.; _ for the ' fire lane at the t n which extends th 9 � arkin 'lot from Beach P Boulevard to Mac ald . 19 . A.; fire . al`arm sy tem shall,, be installed thr ughofit pursuant to Huntington Be h Fire Department Standards . 2`0. The size of he elevator installed shall be a , inimum of 6 feet 8 inches w de by 4 feet 3 inches deep with a mi imun clear opening dth of 42 inches , 21 . On sit fire hydrants shall be installed in locati s approved by t Fire Department . 22. T` trellis above the fire lanes must provide a ,verti 1 earance of ' 13 feet 6 inches , Comm�. The Planning . ° �, . . Condi t io ~ a1� Use ; .,rues the r�i g);�: to r(_vokN,,�tt,i H 3 n , , , Permitnif�any• ,violation of these condition or . of the Huntington Beach Code o c. C_ 11 CONDITIONAL USE 'PERMITMIT NO. 86-25 DRA ;This 'request to increase the number of .children permittAd for day .,care :from 6 to 12, was, originally, brow9 ht .'before the Planning �j �eetinsfon as Conditional 'Use : Permi t No . 85 3 at ,.-their March 5,:,; 1985 � g Staff recommended aPproval of this ' request . The Plann.ing 0 FT .Commission denied this project due to neighborhood opposition and PC .Hinutes -- 6/17/86 "24- (55uod ) x cancerns�:Ifor noise; park•fng .an r ftic con�est3on The p2ica�nt h si1' 1 1985 !CiUssion Council ,,: then :`aappeale`d .: the decia ion to a' " t e. A� _ •• , ' cisi :k pp meeting the Cxty Coun.,il upheld tf r Pl nning Cor. s de on N for denial . 4 The aprhicant has ;`submitted several 'petie�iono. One ;petition hAs, been s ,fined-• by , 9 :, of the:;13 ' households aloiig. Argo.;Circle', statf'ng° than:.they• foresee no:; traiffis probleies* wtth•�',ihe add'ition .,of a6 more ti children, to the exisrsnstatincare 'hoae�ruve of Conetiti,on. has . been: mother .p signed by 17, nei'ghbo' g y pp ditional� 'Use Permit No. 86-25 . :The a licant ,states that ;the hours of operation for the day care are from 7 : 30 AA1 to 5: 30 PM . , 'ENVIRONMENTAL `STATUS: ; The ,1proposed project is exem t'�Class . 3 Sect*on 151'03 from the P Provisions of the California rmvironmentalp' Quality Act . THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Ba'ibara `Leonard, appl: , 'ppoct;,'o_r' the ;'picoject;. .., •Sloe eiplained , that she ha3cdone. everythinguPossible . to .address the. concerns of her neighborhood and feels that her propoisal should 'be approved . Sandra Branch, Lesli ,Susickr Sand` Alexanian , and Gdor y� gee ,cr.istino , ;. : residents in the neighborhood, ' spoke in `favor of the project . Care Cente` a. Christatal from the Public- rrouncil: o Day rs, ' spoke in support of the project , and the applicant . , ' She►� felt that: . Leonard .mat all the specifications of a good - day' care center . All 1en Brusewi'tz . . 3 `,g spoke negatively about the: ,.ac] 'scent nex hbor , . u he felt hi s privacy: was being imposed ;on ro�ec�.. He said , that is because the children in Mrs. Leonard' s yard were too noisy. i man for a e 1e st the ro ject. He felt that :12 `children were Jim Regan , spoke against p t y single milt' home in an RI zone There were no okher. , persons to speak for or against P j t the � ro ecC and the public hearing was closed. - A MOTION WAS. MAYBE B� ERSKINE TO APPRO' " VE wOND2TI0tZAL USE PERMIT N0. ' 86-25 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. There was no second to tbe-motion and the , motion -died . -It. was suggested by the Commissicn that a finding be added making reference to, the numerous neighbors, testifying against the project during the public hearing and .,stating that the project ie not In compliance with an R1 neighbothood. tun ( 5500d ) PC Minutes 25 ; . r , ,4 A •l.,i . A+,MOTION:JIAS' MADE; BY' INCHELL`, SECOND,. BY ROWE;'.;x`O .DEhY,,'.CONDrTIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-25 !WITH ADDED FINAINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:: AYES: Rowe, Winchel1 Schumacher, ' Livengood, Mirjahangir NOBS`s , Erskine `,-ABSENT: , Por"er AASTA i N r No . I M OTxO N r P!►SSE D GS FOR DENIAL: FrNDIN ` , . 1 . The,..g g , he . conditional use . permit wi'1l adversely. affect the' General •Plan of the ' City ,of Huntington Beach. 2. The proposal is not consistent with : the. City Is General., Plan of L-Al d vse. 3. Access ,• parkIng and number of vehicle trips to. the day,, care will cause undue traffic problems for this nei-ghborhood . 4. The;, proposed. day care will have a detrimental ,effect due to noise ,upon. ,the general welfare, ,,,safety- and Convenience of ` pernons residing in the, neighborhood I � . _ adjacent neighbors .'testified . that a home .care " 'facility Numerous a is nct compatible with their "R1 neighborhood 3nu •that'`the:;;noie creatki by a home care facility `is detrimental to :,the en]oyment „ f of their homes . C - 12 CONDITIONAL IONAL USE PEKMIT N0, $6-29/NEGATIVE DEC,, ' t.ATIOw NO.�: t36 o . permit Private . ,, request' t Coon t'ional� Use Permit No ., 86-=29, is a, r unive ity cons.1'sting .of £our `bui.ldzngs . tota1ing,,,9,8 ;square ,feet Arid file u:suant ' to. 'Article 931 ,, Uncclassified;`U � West Coast University ,. • an evening college. designed"to 'e cats working adults . Da_ . y e 'use .of th'e facility wil'1 ' i ude executive train' rg for McDon'nell D I ' i (MDC} employees . e unive;r9ft`y :'is ;planned to be, constructed �.n o Lases;': first "W se 'includes: b I L'n;g 'A and p adjacent arking . a. a second ha p ' re p proposes three.; buildings (B, C, U) , !of which D W,.�ll. be lazed an industrial;- multi.:-tenant bu lding . Buildings B and a intended for educational urposes but may be industrial uses ENVIRONMENTAL 'ST�ATUS;' Pursuant t© tine; vironmental regulation n' eFfect 'at this time , :the;.Departrt"en'c f Development Services 'Post draft Ne" atitfe P ,� P , 9:. . , • Decliii ' t'f on- 86-33� far ten dav$ and> no com ts, either.., verbal or writte pare ,received . .; The staff,:. in'.it's snit 9tudy:_of.' the.:.: , ' o recommended ''that a negative; dpclaration a issued.°'prior project a.�• to an :�etion on Coiidit'iona1 Use ' Permit 'No . '86-29, it : ecessary ,for, ' he., Plz�nni'ng Commission to review and act on NegatiVe D claration "No. 86-33. PC Minutes - 6/17/86 -26- ( 55QOd ) .� F 1 ::• , �, ,j r .�.. trVs.y i r 'ti.' 4 .. k,ri , ..ur s,v a . •t - t r .• '.1 t l y ?�: � .c . r'r4� r ..I•� - ...5 ,t,C'i: } • , T • r C :- '.... r ,,r ,-. ..- •- ... . .,. l' I `' , , G. ;, .,fir ate. .... - .. .. .+i,,• .. 1 ,,...:,,,.,.„ 1. ,. .f t• �Sj '' tti '- - ^'•. L Y. W Y � r `. `•.�.., ! .`. r 15'.;wJysit+l; •.+ tl�ti t� i, 4.i1+yf 'Win,:r.;r 1.. i• t.. •... ,• yY r • hunting# if�� n# �� ae#�f f."'I-1, v m• ;dip PO.R ,y • C . 5 TC• . Pi an Commission •., a1 FROM : Development `Services DATE: June 17- ­1986 SUBJECT CONDITIONAL 05E PERMIT NA. $6-25 APPLICXNT. BarbaCa , Leonard D ,ATE-ACCEPTED 17242 Argo Circle 19 June 3, 1986 Huntington teach, CA 92647 MAN .,; DATORY PROCESSING 'DATE: REQUEST: To allow a large family 1,ugust : , . l 6 day care., home of .up to 12 children, to operate ZONE: R1 {Low Density in an existing single Residential) family home. ;,' i.• i GEi•„_, i R.Arli� PLAN: Low Density 4 LOCATION: 17242 Argo Circle Residential Huntington Beach, CA `< ISTING USE: °Single •am y res` dential .0 SUGGESTED ACTION: pprove Conditional Use Permit No. 86-�25 based on the findings and onditions of approval outlined in this report . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: hi's request to increease the number of. children permitted foc day ally br, ., r 'are from 6 to 1 , s origin ought before the Planning ..mmis9i6n as ' Conditi'onal Use•' Permi t No. 85-3 at their 'March 5 ! 19er 't o eeting' Staff recommended approval of this: request . The ♦ Planning ;a ... ...:_ . . ommission` denle'd this ,pr"o ject,. due 'to neighborhood opposition and - ,onceans�aledntheedecision9tonthtezffic 'congestion. . The •applicant � hen pp April, l"; 1986: City Counci1 eeting. The City 'Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision ; or :`denial. ;I S he applicant has s'_'b tted • several petitions to be included in this ' taffy report. . . One petition h'aa been 'sf`gned by;`9 of_ the ° 13 nuseholds; along Argo„_Circles . stating that they €oresee . no ,traffic -. r'obler�s with :the.; add3tfan of 6 more:.chiddr,en.i"_o the :existing =day- are home. Another - petition has ,,:been . signed by � 1.7 neighbors- stating hEy approve of 'Conditional Vas Per�U No. '86-25. .t.�., c .' + ',• '••i\. .r 1 ' ''}. +•�a'e he applicant states' Eha� khre hours �df operation fa'r the day' care re `from-7:30 AN to 5s30 PM: F �` 4. w r. A•iM��A .. ... .!r. r , .. .�. _ .r, ?..i., r ., `� �-'., .. i .. �,1 ".e . , _ _ .�r t .. 'ilt .. .3, r,^ , %,, d .%•: iit. tl..... .1.. {; 1 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: T Sit�ect Property- ,GENERAL PLAN DES1IGNATIO. ': `Low Density Residential ZONE: , R_1 , LAND ME: "Single Family, residential North East: South, an'd. West of Sub eat. P -� ,i o�e ram: GENERAL' ,PLAN DESIGNATION, _ ow Density Residential ZOVE LAND USE: Single family residential ` 4 `0, ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS Th'e 'p'roposed pro ject - ;i(a; exempt Class 3., Section 15103 frkm the provisions of the California Environmental -Quality. Act. 0 'COASTAL STATUS i. Not applicable . 6 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS : Not ' applicable . P '7 '0 SPECIFIC PLAN: t 'I Not applicable. 8 , 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable . 9,`0 � ISSUES AND ANALYSTS Tie applicant is requesting approval to care far twelve children in her: home : At the present `time , the ;iCounty , has licensed the' ' applicant o , care for. 6 children:, Staff; ,does. not;. Feel _ txaffic wild be a problem as a result .of this .conditional ',uae permit. This site . r .f located 'close to .two n'iajor arteri'ahs (south of` Warner ,and west 'of Go s ldenwest makin ::it Basil accessible ,.to` parepts. wten : dr'opp'ing off or � ickin up._thex.r Y.: q children: Txaffic :impacts should :'also` be r P . , 2 P,y P off ;arid , pick up thei r�:.`minims, ed,;by the fact '��ttiat._ agent's dro . - children ':at ,staggered,, times during 'the day. There; is` also; ample ';Tarring 'an the ;lexistfnq- ';driveway for ';;three cars for , drop-off .and. ' .. pick-Up, .'A 'petition' signed by 9 of the 13 Argo residents states that they do not. foresee : a� traffic problem ad `of � r approval of this project . Staff Repoct - 6/17/86 ..Z.. (5415d ) "Sec on .9331 of 'the Ordinince;Code `re'quYresl'tha't 75,` square feet ' af ,outside p1Ay area be provided for ,each ;child (900. equate feet) at.nd th-aE�.tne �p3.ay :area be planted " 4i_th.::grass -'and "enclosed w th' a w - . :_ play, areas ' sha11'�be �. gate , t'o such. 6 foot hi h fence Also, .any . r Y 9. Pervlsec 'at a7�1"_times .,"- ..7he secUrel� fastened.or shall be, su applicant s,..P -.'I see attachment ?;teflects, c4mpl.ian'ce.' -with°;the, above etated "requirement. ..., The're ,;is approximate, y:-;1 '040 square ,feet .,o, ;usable landscaped area enclosed_; with a , block';�xwall . . The..,0rdinance for: c c 35-square feet of, indoor 'play�.area _e provi+ded Cod_ a also raga . 42 is ",each r hil 0 square fear) . The ; applicant s -pl$nsYrOflects. t+ com 1iEnce :with ,th'isre uirement. There There 890 square 'feet of indoor play , area provided For the children : r SeOttion Issue Descr_ipC'"ion t 9331(d) outdoor play area Requi`re`d .9'00 sq. -ft . Provided: 10410 sq . :. ft$ Indoor play area Required : �410 'sg. ft . ; Provided: '890 sq. ft'. Since the time of the original conditional;, use :permit', :the applicant 4 has: done a few,°,things to mitigate the :impacts of "noise . -on,,.': <; ,.surrounding proper ties . . The. wood fence that existed along , the;;: applicant a, rear yard has been replaced, with "a. 6 foot, high ' block wall . - . ;The 'applicant therefore has 6, foot high walls along three 1 g. .'property lines, the applicant has adopted out one of .;her. ,do s , which seemed to be bothering -,the neighbors due, 'to" itag:barking: y ren 'to keep) , .theirlvoices down-whilecoia;ing3�in thebacksyard,, cin,ord6r~ to reduce far the applicant will be, re uired to hire 'an - assAs- to ' t- are cared noise impacts to. ,the neighbors. I,. seven or more ''" PP_. .,4 . ' -�istant ,;- according to; State licensing requirements . With the addition of this assistance, the applicant believes she will be able to 'superyise the " children more closely and therefore be able to reduce noise levels even more. a specific f is time play , The � children also 'have p me to la outside in .order .. to aedroximatel 10:00.AM to 11 :00 AM . Intthehafternoon, childde - renYarre PP, Y + e - outside between about 3 :30 ' PM and 4 :30 PM. C ENDATrON : f 10 �0 RE QMM � .Staff r ecommends the Plans ing Commission approve Conditiorai Uise Petmit No. 86-25 based on the following findings and con dition,s 'of approval . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: per 1 . TSP., granting, of the conditional use mf t will not adversely affect the General Plan of tineCity of Huntington Beach. 2 . The proposal is consistent , with the City' s ` General' Plan of Land Use. # Staff Report 6/1 i t 1+ 3.' �ecces`s, 'parking and``numbeir of veh'icfe trips ' to the day care will 'hot cause undue traffic prot►lems for this neighborhood. ry 4 . The `pro josed 'da care wf11. not hive' a detrimental :. effect due to p. .+ y:`.:. : ` s residing. i.n the neighborhorod. venience of � person - : }; noise upon the ,general welfare, safety and con' SUGGESTED CONDITIONS. OF- APPROVAL.- 1 . . The a'"! ,•,A.;, . ,- <. ... . . . .. . . . .,.; pplicant shall hi an assistant to be . present during the hours , of operation, upon acceptance of the seventh ch'ild'' for ` 'day care. . 2 . The` site '-plan dated' May 8 pproved .layou , 198fi, shall be the a� t . 3. The day care ,'operation shall be limited to- of twelve children . 4 , P'rio'r to, operation of the day care 'operations the'' applicant shall 'Obtain approval from Orange County Social Services Department. 5 The, applicant, shall file with the, Department of Development Services a , copy of the Orange County license which pe 'mits care of twelve children. b . The aday Sc30eP€aility shall operate betwee `' urs of 7: 30AM n the ho n M daily . 7. 'The ;. app obtain a business license from .the City of, Huntington Beach . 8. The garage shall not be used for the day care operation. 9. The:,. Planning 'Commission.:reserves the irigtit. to review%revoke this conditional: u'se permit;rapprova evF , f ..'an .. o€ ,:th :'s a �ovn tti`e :e:�t� o , ^ 5. violations of the terms, pp al, :or violation, ofx;1the _, applicable zoning 1a r upon" ev`i'derice` that the 'occupancy e.. detrimental to 'the neighborhoods '.any such'"decision sh'all 'be °`is shal�aed by; notice 'to the applicant, a public hearing, and be based on specific findings . ll. 0• ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 'Den Conditional Use Permit No . 85-•25` based on the 'following s findings: ,. ..FINDINGS FOR= DENIAL: �>; Th�e�. granting : of the •,'conditional -use. permit' will adversely affect the General Plan l ,of the City,. of 'Hunt, ington Seach . Staff Re ort 6 17 8 • • 2. Thee proposal , is not `conmistent with the City' s General' Plan of ' Land Uae I 3 . 1�cess , parking and number,. of 'vehicle trips to :the !,c�ay' care Will .cause `undue' traffi','oproblems for this neightiotYtood . � . Th'e ro hosed 'dalcar:e• wi11 have °a 'detzimental effect, du°e to I : P y, Y noise ;upon ;:the: general `welfare, :. safet and convenience 'of persons residing in the neighborhood. ATTACHMENTS s x smap,.., . 24 :Pairc'eV, ma - 3 . s and -f�l oor;i plans . tive' describin rde'6t sate 4 Narra g .,,.p 5. Pe;ti'tion regadt`ng traff:.c h._ - fi . Petiwion. in support of' .Conditioral Use 'Permit No . 86-25 ' 7. . Declaration fro m current day care parents =80 Letters n' support of Conditional Use Permit No . 86-25 i ►7WP s EN:Ala , 1 I '♦ I Staff 'Report - `5/17/8b -5- (5415d ) s „ 4 i ajs.: anr ; g4� f'•�OT' JJI • �. �,, .�+ �•�.halal!! -i.�i. ., •� A �... it se •. 4111041060* . N1,•ur 1 got pwo a•..- file so, t+•M ' Jr j �7�0 • ache• loom ..�•. ♦'t'T�+ J, , . saw 4-4 N�! . IF r ' Itrts Nh wrt f••w }, �•wwrr•wt••.t w .r•'r �� •MM. _ M , ttt,/• i•w•tMw:�f+i+fr fir. w+ w sr 1+66dan:101 UNDO to owtvao W.4 pwt+ilwr,•, Maw! »I Ilta•ot w M•M AW44" �wa+•. rr s••+w •tr.,., qr<n tt•hrl� � � , t,1�Mtr+ 1 ------ .... -__-. .. _� _'; .ihit .. i �-�� _ ,���. !•r• ` rl!!�!!•¢TA 11ara give of Proposed Project 1 propose ;:o open .my home to more 'ch:.-ldren aid their, famlies ono:. a_ -5 1:1 :Ze_c. .o_ a la_ a- . fa•• it daycare home, i oh •a capac zy of a 60 12 Children. 1 -_an curre' n Il • -.I_, censec,. to care for 6 children •arid I'ra S :r. mull to o ! license capacity. r, .:.y .zoom:s of opera:ion will ;be. fr0M .7 .30 `'to 5 :'30Pm. , b:-?. . �h n ir..r se ,.•e,riunber. .of c. 11 be _carin s t ;- Y dh •- P. '� l"dpez I_ w�the :,c:�ildr�n o " .;v+13• em^lo a.. �.,�o^a? hel to su erv.ise • in order,-to.;keep he not a level to,• a minium, ,The noise level should eve. be red aed from wha` '`it currently may- - �e wi:.h addi Liorlal help. �'s •to �rzf`'ic ,. , I see no problem as moss parents arrive and pick. :un : their children up at differen� . tirnes,,'of 'the day. he , parents are here and gone. They us.e_, extremeL,caution zn theJIr driving (more so than ' some o= :the . re'side'.nce of .he neia:^.florhooc ) and 'hey respect. the neighcors rights ' and property. ilorer (1�.9no. to 4. ) have a sepera�e :play' ,hP older ch yr. l�h�ourri. m aamoz•-iinoe a�rox� yl0amsupervised outside,•;for ; c y P y 'n the ••- i g ( r t llam. ) and 'l' hour in the afternoon (aprox. 3:3OPm. to 4 :30 pm,, ) The infants (4 m v ay/sleep room ir{luhe front3ofothe�house. This roompi5ate 'set u with port-a-crios .and la ens and the room is set u g group P p P play-, P with a curriculum wi:h that agein `:mind. . . All,' 'the children eat together in my large ,,faaiily. ;kitc'en ?'hey' are `dail'y provided.; with shot nutritious 'meals. The, older, 'chl{t�.z•en have . a criild site irs in the �i �chen•:� at will accon , ,: ants P to �e, an .•��c a . " • .� � h• adate u to 8 � ch•ildren� and are furnished with high chairs.. . In .addition the kA.Mchen,, 's used for arts and crafts and . potty training ( the latter up to age 3 yrs then they use the big potty) . r she children have a ;z-le outside space in :the„ play yard which Y P Y s cement- i'or r_diri ac tivities. she have: a la house to e grassy areas as •veil a - tic : p..ay ;and a �swn€ as set to ,hel promo �e lam a and mall ` mo s or'`develo ' en,., r ncourag�e., drama P P E '` pun just , to u na:'ae a ..few. . •.ate grow vegetables and they;have their :own wf' st dirt area for_ play. The chi .� r. 6 t}ieir, ' 6 . (Anabelle) and the cat & do: �ily 1. airs to pro�ride f cr the chil��Pl� 1 SER CES ` L 1t,r MAY'. 8 M MAY a • � 19b r.0. fox 19Q pag YZ. e I cf: 2 pages .► +lr •.1wr+ :. . .• . w.w• .a••+•.• '`. .. ...� •.y ••sl.•. ,.. w.i►►-• I. s •y••-. ..•�•.. .•.rl..•y r�'r _ r Sri,. Iia + � 'I . ,s ,», ,. ,•a•. ''♦♦ba `r'j � 1' h:rsceivelan average off' : fto 3{ phone 'calls 0. each!-;wee:;..`fron .parents why are looking-', .",oz '. day;;car± for their cR;ldren tFuse: theme; because i'm'a: ar curreZt my area and.:I :.have �o re.. license ` capa-city, I need the issuance of a CU?. i� have a oeert`. cari:i , fo_ fore 1='ttle,;�tiy� lr:.an for,ove: a year ^, arid, •hi s �: o -h M a er i ,.. . n -, as 7 ^�h s ��Curren�l•y� on ma�2`ni ty' leave {r�.e. 3r_ w, :baby. s s per. . ., a .would �-e a phys..ca.L '' a" `-emo uonal' an has a new , ,haveo�reloczte 3r,an�� at' to spli t� up he;:.: : � re:� - crt: :o ,? ardsh�, on these '"par nts , ch_ld Lhis t me. L'nee� ' h . ' ' incrA3sed (.Ct;Py l 'cenee in order e 11P care for this new bay also . siricerel , Y Ii 'Barbara Leonard page 2 of 2 pages :i 1 •'�•1•ti. I► •tt.ywty t/ •�•sr+q r I,•C1Mrin(.•et•��:r�'!!}+.',1�\ wYw:t"•'.• ww�T'"n 1 . ► r ♦:•� w . �+�:1'eiv r, .`i♦ `�,i . ♦+• ♦ .: ., . 'n: ..j .ter� �rT -.`. ' _ y ?. . \ ti ,j.,yna•.ty ti c!N a, .. ! .t. , w'.apt! J �.. �� I" •�-Z ;'. v y_K V•.�f ♦ti r � cui� 8�..25 RESEARCH. -INFOR?�AITQN .. r 1. The number df .11ceased .large 'family 6 ydayoa hres ns few other cities An Orange' County ,are as `follows: a. Costa *4esa has. 12 homes licensed b, Ga den Grove has 9 homes 1`icenoed c. Anaheim , has 18 `hcmYes licensed � id, In the City of Hunti gtnn Beach then a are ? lireriised large family day care homes.' 'the. citizens and `children gin` our c . ; . . ..,, , city less im ortant then those of other a 6 in Orange County? 2 The Commission on the Status of women shows the number of , women in the labor force has increase tietween 1970:d 2 and '1984. The commission found that .`5a`, 582 'of those work women are mothers of children under six years of age'. •Y Th e need', for more large family daY care homes is ' increasiing' proportionately. There are aproximately ten pre schools in the 92647 z'ip de area and of those research is as follows f A. Openings (as of June 1986) , 1. Two schools accept infants and. they are both full, no p .. ., They have no infant o ening s and have to turn propl'e away, , 2, Four centers, are full`, no openings, Riid three centers have' very few openings for txi'e two :to ;five year olds. 3. s ` ' w The direct ors of 1, a centers state 'that` there ,i a need for quality► in�home infant caxe in." "our area. e , day care is -better suited to infant 'care.. Parents like , the :,dea 'oz �' their in fonts .in a home j ' atm6sphire with th0 i to ' tions {of moving "them 'to 'a 1 school .later (around 3 to 4 yrs . ) 4. One, Co-op school exists which requires 'parent participation and they close 'over the summer: months. ; t U costs, ,. •. a. Star p • ,, in'c�l.uding �invento`ry and , supplies to o en a ors. school even; i h , P , n a cioged ' c ool runs from . .'3C,000 ,00 ao $50;QOQ 660 . , L. it J • , • hi�`ormation resources were submitted by the 'o�.lowingi 1. .. . ,Orange County Social Sarvices+ Supervisor, of, -116e' nsingo Susan'.Martinez: 2. A. letter -to 'me, dated' March 121 1986, -from State Senator John SPyimour: 3• der- the ,'Rainbor"`, '6621 Glen Dr. H tiiigton ch 92647 jlf H } uitirtgton Beach ParemSchaol".' 17200 Pinehuret St« :.H; B: " ftn' teseoriot' Huntington Beach" , 17200 Pinehurst St: •lie 'So' "A Childs View"; 1?200 Pinehuirst St. , H. B. . "Pleasant .view"' 848..2733 "North Huntington Bea-ch C^-r*unity Nursery" s 'Clark S*. 'H Be "Bandburj •Cross Pre-School" 16761 Viewpoint Ln. , h'. B. "Huntington Heach Pre-School" , ?945 Alderich ; H. B "Der Kiiider Garden Pre--School" , 8lbZ Ellis St.; H. B. nder-Care Learning Center" , 19342 Beach BLvd.', H, Be '92648 i ) .... ;`i;!' 4' '•ty't 1,14i'1 t').r r. •..N+:r �- �>j )`Y,is .,;)2 .. .'^+^w.r.)_`!•.. . . ..7.t_-'^_w _-�'_ __- - -- •UU 1 ,' ' l 1f1:1i :S i _i �`Iri, . wM1 }i l;•i •" t � �� ..ii 11+ � f <r e. • IftTe `ne3L,hbors .are 'Not ;in oppositions and`;feel.'Aarbara Leonartl &hould oe ;issued a Co4ditionaa:' Use Permit i`rom the Ci;-Iy of Huntington Beach -to do' Child `day care in I=;;t'orsea, no traffic.;.. roblems, as th'e parents are very 't'isus �in ` ttiel,r, drivfrig ond `;� t � i3 :rrare �to are ; mo're ,:' than'' one car in :front of her' houEse . a t a time. They ; are, here a very brier time then gone . .44 i : 1 _ - r...w s.... r...�wrr �`w.+uwM .r. �rwr•• I�.a� r , w of ✓� r / U i 40A. .4, 1 I . j1". � CJ . ! rT .1..�• i !F�w„_.ram r�: /���....�. ` 1'i,i ♦ Z,�ti+ �..r♦ i aT ' 1 I , �4--;®r HUONGtOM BEACH QDUOPMENT S MCES so Igo Iiti�rt�rtae 8e�►,�, (6700 WARNER) 180 (6770 WARNER a IT q. 17111 - GOLDENWEST) w w bb b1 r r� r � w ti � d � .► w �c e• m oh a w w a w �o w w �1ti r41 r � w w � w � b� , o DR' J 1ti� h�ef ROOK 'DR. b.q Z r � 11"n n m o N N ry a'" 17192 17191 .J tc W CANT ,:"' tr Y w °~` w m 17202 17201 17202 h 17202 + 17202 1' 202 17201 J U a n ?f1 111� 1720 1 PARK w la w 172121, •• 172 17212 17211' r, t° N Rf 17222 �`'r cc 7222 1 221 17222' 1722 V llcl117221{ .o � 17231 U 17232 7 723 17231 '�'`_. ai 17232 17232 7331 TucAN �o~ 17242 17241 1724 17241 1 O 17241' LC A 17251 W 17251 '" 17252 b ry 1725 J 17351 Y Z 17252 J -� Q 17252 17251 N W 17272 17271 p0 1727 17271 17272 - 27 17271 w w ice+ °'aa O 17282 11�1 �PSTONE GR. .. a;. , CODbry N N f. �y N fV ry ti 17292 �'� w r. y • h w w o. n ca m ,w m ao to cn, w m to .a w �c w un ►�� � 17: ry GOLDEN VIEW SCHOOL 17�02 17 17302 1j�1.. !7101' 113p2 �� 17302 : 1730 173 v+ ��,a 37 311 2 1 �1� 731l 3 17312 1r „ ��'� . 311 t 173,E w 732 � 1732 1732 �'L1 17321 — (1725t GOLDEN' VIEW) 173�1 c9 17342 17.�1 U �1 4 322 17321 -� 173; c'' 17342 34 ` b ~ 17351 173/2 17341t 173/2 17341 s 173 w b� � a7352 17351 17352' 17351 17352 17351 N 17352 `� 1736L BAKER DR 17 = 17351 173,. D38 r-ly17362 361 17]62 17361 173b2 1731i .o� a. �-�6 �� d��� b 737117372 17]71' 17372 17371 1737? 17371 173'1-1�600 U 17382 17381 tr 17362 17381' r 17382 17381 17382 j 'e17392 17391 V 17392 17391 J S� n', `°° �` W 17381 FORD 61 ,, w 17341 S 17392 1%391 17392 17391 17392 1739 y . 1� ` ,. c� 1739 173 � 17402 :,,1 ,� 17/01 � 402 17/01 Q; MANHATTAN oG +t �R.t; 174C Ca 17412 w 17/1 1T411 �1W 47i12 17411 17i12 17411 N N., 17422 J 17/12 0o m` �' ago m m, ;� �. my .d 174, 7<31 W 17421 d 17422 17421 w w �o �a .o w co coch .J a` 17422 17421 vs w .tio w �o 17422 17-02 -- co Li ��, ,� O 1744: 317437441 �, w w 17i41 � �o w w �a (o ~ 17 i t 2 ao ao ao ao o, e, 17452 Q~ 'a w �o w w w �0 1744, CORY DR ti1�� Y SPICKARG DR N � N N N N N rl N N N W 17462 {.l �G n co O+ 0 N P^1 ^� N N h /Ny N N N Z N N N �y ry Y ti7 O 1�D 1�Q 1�010 W y yr ip 17 i 2 n in t G cc co co co to fNr � j w 0 w w %o �c y w L SLATER '' ti1� PETITION IY FAVOR OF 3Ar ''::�RA L�Qi�A�D' S. OHI'�0 DAY Gsx HONE • e undersi ed, as neighbors' and arenas of cr I. rho are I ne©d e , 'the 8n P ofwa licensed Day Care Home , do support Barbara Leonard in her care of toddIers and infants . Oe ask the%appropriate legislative body of the aCity Counsel" to approve her Conditional Use Permit. ADDRESS S 7 Alf �• liavll j r . t r / .20 --�- ` g9 J �.... 21 ✓ / 7 '�+� AEG c C' .a.-�......r 2' � z /1 Z" 2 - NUt�titlCTOM BEACH 2"♦ - A, _�.... ._ Hunuftean %xh, CA 92"1 / f (6700 WARNEh�� .; 180 (f 770 WARNER a 1� 17111 GOLDENWEST) v No oNo m w 'n %a w .o .o .o %0 a %o �'1ti r� � �o w V w .0 �a �o w ; w 1 N ti DR 7 1tib f�1� ROOK . DR, r 1 : ro N ryr4 It O .d �► r 1H �O n W O .hi � own1 w {ram r+ w Ca. 17192 17191 .J ra .^o _ aCUPm � m Ctr Ai _ %o S so �03 f�3' ao Z cv e� a 11202 1� 7202 1r `1 201 ,Z.1 17202 L a" 17201` -3 m. 17202 17201 r PARK V r% n nL&J 17212 r `�1J ti11` 7211 17212 17211 .,< 04 0 722 17221 17222 • 11� 17221 �' o c°"°.v N R R 17231 V , 1722 V '1 1.212 1723 17231 17232 jf 17231 �;fTUC,ANA 17241 X ,,: O n 4. O 17252 1725/1i2;2 1721; 1724117 17251 li252 17351 CD 1?2S2 17217252 a W 17372 11271 17272 1. 71 17272 } �, " 17271 17282 1.0 �'AP TONS . :_ r,, DR. �I N M n ry r�, n eV n4 17292Ato' cc o •-� rs In .c- a, ^ bb0�1 cc 40 w,. ,°Dp GOLDEN VIEW SCHOOL 17302 1�, 7302 �,� 17301 7302 r 1.7 17301 17 Cal �o :57 17311 Fes- 1732: 11 �1^� 17311 Z 1",312 J 17311' l� 712 1732 1Q 17342 U1 ` 173221� U 11 173.1 Z 17173/1 9(1725I GOLDEN* VIEW 1 17312 17341 17342 1734f 1731_ 17341� 17 �' old 17351 Q 17]S2 r4 17351 1735217M 17352 17351 17352 17351 1+ 11351 BAKER DR c{ 1�J 27 �j? 1.y 17352 17361 17]b2 17361 1 17362 l7761 17, �• �'D,o �1 y �", 2 a •,'�, j�� 1 J b^ a� a. 7371 >; 17372 7371 17372 17371 17372 17]el' V Jg 17rI 17 17382 7381 V Z n oo ,a 81 X 17382 17382 17381 17382 17392 17391 ..„ 17391 --� y1 �, W I c 17] W �; 1718! FORD 17392 61, �a ro ,�0 17391 1139Z 7391 17392 I7]91 17]92 `' A 1 , ,< x. 3 1 :DR.;. 17 17401 17402 17401 739 MANHAT�TAN t , w 17/12 r ; Ir 174I 17422 17411 4 •l7412 17411 17412 17411 Z �, „� n; n, N,., a. O • .J 17 412 M .r ; v� a r ory,e . o ' N nv `a 114 x m t0? c o 0o cc oa w .',of ch a% ch 0► 17/2. 7431 W 17121 Q 1742.2 17421 Cr 17422 17421 17422No' to %a `° �O •'a iO '0� .-� ., ,� «. ., 17, `� C.a o n n }� 1.4 42 1744 n. n .. �n -0 � cr Z m ao � 17 4/2 �e w %all �a .o CORM DR 745� 1*ti Y SPICKARD 17/62 CIS N N fV N N N N n N N �1 N N P1 N .N N , •.•1 N r• �D P m A 4 N fn r. b1 0% C .r N h or V1 z N h N h N fV .O w w w ,�°o �o 17/72 w .a'o cc in ca .J �^, a°'o va. n~+ o�'. � SLATER 2 r.L � • + �, 1. •,• .� .�^`a.: - ! r: .•S � �, •,, ..N<: • .f ,• -Y •. rf.+ Kir�i! r::•i...f1j 1 •j M'•�. t ` .r'�` �. .ry. . •.' • •;' ._. - .. •a. . •'. v .. .7. • •, fy• s 7.!:`• �r.p ir. .I'ry.' ♦-.•.•IZ 1 1986 • DECLARAT IO c FTC ren zy of the children :•.ho have placed our . �'.:�1�:.•r�r: in .:ne care of i:artara Leonard .Feel she issued a Use Permit from the ,,i of :;ur: .ington E-each. This would allow more par :::s .. ch I ire: :he opp.)rtunii zy of receiving , r; •s=d eu:_?i 66 dn.;; care in ^er home . ex:r e:ae caution whe" d,iveirg through the _::i zorh.3od and w-, re spec t the property of the ,-..bors by keepiang ull drive Hays clear at all ::.T =s e :c . .i am here at the Iriost, cakbe. 5 minu" tes F:. e :�orni::g and in the afternoon/evening. tra:'fic problem as it is very rare :o _':.rd more than one other car in fro: , of her t o t..M a . I 64 OF f, a 1. ✓ � r` } � 1 1 i HUNTIMGTOM BEACH Dfb'EIOPMENT''SERVICES � l986 • P.O.- B" 190 Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach ,I i To whom it may concern; I very close the Leonard family ri'gh�•--,rext' doox. S.1. " -I een doing day care in her home, I have had no problems --P•-Ith either traffic or unreasonable noise I feel she is doi:: a wo:nd=-,Sul 4 o o •.Pith the children' as well as he;p:.n€. :•;or:c-;n;x Parents in our communi z;; to feel con-_dar that their children are well care4. fcr. I feel Barbara should be gr tec he requested Conditional Use Per.^i. :o enahoo e her to serve more parents in our i i "ours -9.L:r';f, � t i JANE JACKSON --� 17242,1UUP LANE HUNTINGTON 1EA0i, GAL 92647 (714) 54a.8996 Evelyn Hichka. Assisteint Planner June 8,1986 Huntington ??teach Planning Commission P 0 BOX• 190 Huntington Beach , CA 92647 re t Barbara Leonard 's Conditional Use Permit #86-25 for family daycare facility Dear Ms. Nichka : We have . received o , '... • above a lica-tion. We. are ` your notice cf public ing regarding thc►;, PP re nei h�ior, g � of �Sarbara Leonard. We -? ave lived at our current Eddress for the past thirteen '(13� years and seen o the Ci. zY grow,- in population �fe recognize the value and im p rtance of the services Mrs . Leonard can offer to fam- mes in the area and we trust that you will grant her application. I Re.spectf•,Il:y. Wi.�liarn Jacks ' ac s i RU' MNON sERv+CrS VV N 11 • P. b. Box 190 eo648 WUt�tlnBi�'�' pert CP r _0 �7�.q�;' .: � �t,y ", {� - — --` ^ra•� }^- ,.`"`s..'a'p!if�`i3}1j�ar <lc .L•fi•�"»... icy. t "`_�"'.••vh,-'- - ..... .�._._��✓ i I1 Jun el 156 + Planning Commission I'm unaJle to attend ton:,ghts hsaring as my son graduates tanight. I would like to say that I live one house away from Barbara ` Leonard. I spend 'a.,lot of time in my back yard, messing with my plants and enjoying the weather. I am not disturbed that Barbara fees day care, as I do not hear the children, no matter what time ;. of the day it is. There is Va noise problem. If there were a traffic problem, I would see it, . because I live on the :of Capstone;. sd''Argo Corner:T 'Cirole: ° ' There is No vra�ffic +problem an don t think there would be one if she cared for ,pore children. Sbe is doing a valuable and 'much needed sersrice for our city and I think she should be given a Conditional Use Permit. b II1 1 f, t Yours respectfully, 1 t 1 1 �I s' . 1 ' tt ;1 June 13, 1986 Huntington Beach Planning Commission, Due to a prior committmentt I 'm unable to attend the Planning Commission hearing of June 171 1986. Because of the type of work I do, I'm at home for long periods and outside quite oL*ten . I've .ever heard Barbara ' s day care children f while I'm outsift . The only reminder I have that she f even doeu day care, is when I see her taking them for a via?k occasionally, on a nice day. I've not Found and do not anticipate: any traffic problems as it appears that the parents come and gc at different times of the day. I urge the Planning Commission of Huntington Beach to grant the Conditional Use Permit to Barbara Leonard , as her services are eery much in need in our community. Please take the above statements Into consideration } as it I were in attendance at the Planning Commission Hearing. 1 r Respectfully, 017 Terry et son Ar212e' go Circle Hunino Beach, Ca. 9 64? , b 4 IWA }� r . 1 June 17 , 1996 TO WHOM. IT MAY CONCEFRN: It has come to my attention that Barbara Leonard wishes to FI increase the number of children she is '1--aring for. I see no Droblem with this . I am aoaare that she cares for apnroxiinai. ly eix children now. Living across_ the street, I see no traffic problems , no problems with the children themselves , and no increased noise . if other input is requested you. may �'con :act *,, ,t me at Westminster Police Department , 899-3311, 1600 to 2400 hours, Tuesday th ough Saturday. Sincerely, G Dx. ick V. Upstill l-7241 ?fir . o Cir. ncrton Beach, CA 92647 Ri �mY1�.:."".r .....{.. ,r. `.?'' ..;;'.iC�.1 ,,Y,'.';X.il t.uc: '^"• _ �i.. � .._ ..•,wrwrt • ,.. +wwl�'71k'Y.Y'@ll}7.t't _�'Y'1:�+ H;ftt��+'7XlZ RtltM"" } "'+"v r.. •^^.., _..^<..+,. Jung, 17, 1986 To Whom It May Concern: This letter in written on behalf of Barbara Leonard, ile hi-ve a daughter 2� years old, and Mrs: Leonard has been nun child care provider for alwat 2 year,. We consider His. L;:onard a higbly capa'ale' and organized provider; The children in her care are given a great' deal_ of personal attentf.on r.w? it Is reflected in the warm relationship she has with etch of them: 1,t.tvE visited her ,home on several occasions unannounced an,. have found tta ::h,':c're,•t playing and having .fun Without becoming wild or mruly. Good child care is hard to find, and, because we both work, it is, a necessity. i We are more than happy with the cart given to our child, and the enrictmrnt she receives being with other children close to her age: Respectfully submitted, i i d.; miake Maryy - 8211 Teas. Dr. untington Beach,�Ca.( 26 .7- ,I a V �! j • -. • -+•:'-w►s .0.dL*'.' 2XWMW- _.wnrs�w w iRJ�ccs�««F^f'E ,i➢ S:NATE C66-ZAT1UN �, STATE OF CALIFORNIA q.N7. cou��rTeEs 7UWET AND MC.Ly NEVIEW NATURAL, RESCiURGCS ►KE paw A PO"TA*ILM E Ef4ECi GoMMituc Cut DRUG TItAtiSVOiiTAT10N •. AND ALCikWt ADUSE REVV0C A TAXATI13N C►'LAW 4 va• SMECT CCUM11ME ON TOURISI.t A440 AVIATION JOHN SEYMOUR 5E►+AT0Q,TIUa7Y•F.FTN 013TRICT CHAIRMAN SENATE %PNORiT► C-NOCLri March 12, 1,986 Ms . Barbara Leonard 17242 Argo Circle Huntington Beach , California 92647 Dear Ms . Leonard , Thank you for , taking the time to respond to my recent questionnaire and for expressing your views relative to the licensing of -more large family day care homes . M During the past session my colleagues and I have: worked diligently to ad.re3s the needs of the children of this state . I.n so, doing , x focused a great deal of my attention 'An the area of child care, I, too, share your concern, Ms . Leanprd, over this important issue. There is indeed a tremendous need fot licensing in order to care for our most important natural resource , our children. Adcording to a study by the Commidsion on the Status of '.Omer., the number of womon in the labor force in4reabed 52_ percent between ,1970 and 1984 , to 542, 400. The ,commissiohTf6 thcrg+a'_'working whme� are :mot;hers: ot chl�reri:+"�rianrd%Sir'yaa�s of-aide. :for,=large fai ;ly."'aavG ca"r` fa_ cih .ti s a4,�;,ncfean ng, propor.ttL'. mat6Iy and we will xesearch this asp !t of the child care issue for potential legislation, again, thank you for writing , Ms. Lecnard, and ease don'.t hesitate to contact me again about any matter o. mportance to yuu or your family. , Sincere y, OHN SEYDS4UR s State Senator JS:kmf Government is a contri..vance of human;•windom'`to provide for 'human , want. . --Edmund Burice (1729-1797) OS;TNCT J150 rOWNC CLNINC P"CE. 'JUiTC.20'! ♦IiANQI�i.CAL*OVPhA 910,7E N1'1A 47,141 3N5.17Pp' '. -lop' ' �'!.� ,• t � '', ^ .ate ..tea' f� Pub13s July $; 79q I 6Va Z--' -, NOTICE OF PUBi.TC HEdUXG APPEAL TOTLANNINO COWSSIOU DENIAL OF 'CONDPIONAL USE ' PERMIT NO. g -25 (DAYCARE WITHIN `HWE) ►JOTICE IS HMEBY GIVEN chat the Hunt_.ngion Beach City Ceuncil Rill hold a k public hearing is the Council CII azber at the. Huntington Beach Civic ' Center, 2000 aIn Street, Huntington Beach, Califor ,la, on the date and z-t the time indicated below to receive and conslder''the statements of all oersons Who Irish to be heard relative to the application described below. +' DATE: Monday, July 21 , 198` Lam.: 7:30 P."' i A-0?LICATt:,N I UMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 86-25 Appeal LOCATION: 17242 Argo Circle - R1 - 1Low Density Residential District) PROPOSAL: Appeal of Planning Commission e+, nial of applicant's request to operate �. a large family day care home of u,-, to 12 children, in an 1 existing single family home. E'+!M-0NXLNTAL STATUS: Categarical ly exempt from the provisions of the California Environmentally Quality Act. '.J�: A copy of the proposed conditional use permit is on file in the Department of Development Services. ALL V7ERESTED PERS0.7,5 are invited to attend saia hearing and express opinlous or submit evidence for. or against the application as outlined P P., above. All applicaticns, a=hibit,�*. . -:nd desz000 Main. Street Hunti an ?.re - • rytions of this ro osal on. file with the Office .of the City `Cler►t, M , ng `n Beach, Californla, for inspection by the public. W.1trINGMN BEACH CITY COUNCII. F By: Alicia M./'.t ea' tvorth City Clerk Phone C714) 536-5405 • r s • ".'Dated: July 1 , 4VIIt w..r +-..;zt•ts x^1'His i c.s.r;.,Nr ,t{•.:.� _ .. ,�,•1'!' ._��,,,c, .. s. .,. .k.ayA."k r.rllr W.._ 'e ,,.. ... ..,.Y.5 ..w'• `?�.,,•c15+r.+.�.... - ....,. ..�.-..r•--- - `ri..:a:..rr ;r w NOTICE TO CLERK, TO S HEDULE PUBLIC /H7EARING I l E14 vV r TO: CITY CLERK' S OFFICE. DATE: � �'� Lb FROM: JeRe- N , r • . PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE 5-E JAY OF 198 attar ed AP' s will followata. Cop cn No AP' s Initiated by: A . • Planning_Coninission Planning Department i Petition I 1 * Appeal f ' Other Adoption of Environmental StaLut (x) •,e,xo f, Has City Attorney's Office been YES 0 informed of forthcoming public hearing? r Refer to Planning Department - Extension # 2. for additional information-. * If appeal , pl-ease transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . • r , . k . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-25 ( Day Care Within Home f NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach Planning Commission will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Hun'tinaton i � Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider'' the statements of all persons who . 1 er on h wish to be heard relative to the P r e h application described below. k. --�-=�-�-- DATE/TIME: 7tra APPLICATION NUMBER : Conditional Use Permit No. 86-25 APPLICANT: Barbara Leonard, , LOCATION: 17242 Argo Circle ZONE: R1 ( Low Dens ' ty Residential i A REQUEST: To allew a large famigy day care home of up to 12 S7 children , -t operate in an existing single family ho' ms . ENVIRONMENTAL STATiVS ; V E%emp- ',rb►M �f�. P w.r 1 x t C o F -f-kc- Coll '�r h l•� ��v l w h•,tom►"` C ON BILE : A cony of the proposed conditional ate' _ p P n i t i on a l use permit m z t i s o n file in the Denartment of Development Services , 2000 Main cf . ' Street, Huntington Beach ) California 42648, for inspection by the public . t ALL INTERESTED PERSONS a invi� to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit zt e for or against the application . r as outlined above. If then ny further questions please call 536-5271 . E James W. Palln , Secretary Huntington Beach Planning Commission ( 5323a-71 Is , r • YAV.w yy:+..: <'^... .: ;,.. .r •. .:.t.7y ....O a♦ urY. �X:1'S'!.i+w' 3:�:iF.ziYIVK�w++�r.... A Publi sh July 8, 19f�6 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HP,ARING APPEAL TO PLANNING C010IISSIQN DENIAL OF 'CONDITILINAL USE PERMIT N0. 8E-25 (OAY CARE WITHIN HOME) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council: Char:ber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE:: Monday, July 21 , 1986 TIMg: 7:30 P.M. APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 86-25 - Appeal LOCATION: 17242 Argo Circle - 'RI - (Low Density Residen:fal District) PROPOSAL: Appeal of Planning Commission denial of applicant' s request to operate a large family day care home of up to 12 children, in an existing single family home. ENVIRGNMMAL STATUS: Categorically exempt from the pro-1-I.-ions of the California Environmentally Quality Act. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed conditional use permit is on file in the Department of Development Services. p_LL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined r above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are t on 'file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, 'California$ for inspection by the public. ' HUNTI2:c;TON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714)' 536-5405 July y 6 . . 1 198 jr a Cr GPI SE7 �4a D P ES S I N� �or,.�. ,� Ir 37-823 ���xs) 30Aat �.AB�LS ` DAREIARA C01JPLrR j_t91+Af.D 11EAUElE111 AM. BOOM 6932 CA1l13 112112 ARGO CIRLCE.. 6892 CAPSTONE HUNTINGTON DEM1,CA.92647 Y HUNTINGTON BEACII,C1.92647 11UNTI110TON EIEACII.CA.92647 116 13t=1'� "165-135-05ti 1165-133 2 i ` EINF.R 9TE.FFERitlti w � -- 17301 ORfY Lt1, GRACE. STEELE HAPY11) FOLEY }iUNT]'VG70N PEAClI,CA9c6i7 6912 CAPSTONE., 6922 CANIS CIO. HUNTINGOTN PEACII.CA.99-6h7 HU11TINGOTH DEACN,CA.92647 r6g-aTTit6" ' 165-135.06; P'165-433-23r CLAREIICE BRYAH ERED WA1. IM111 ADA 1730? MY LN. 692? CAPSTONE6921 BRAIN HUNT111=11 VEACH,CA.92647 HlltlrlNGC711 VEACIi,CA.92647 HUNT TUCANA NtITINCOTN nEAC11,C1.4207 .0 -135�07, 1651'33=24► SIMS AHDopiti WITHAYA THAHATM.OL11 PAUL A1ITONS011 17301 NHETHOPF 6952 TUCANA 6931 TUCANA HUNTIGUTN PEACH,CA.92647 NUNTINGTON EBACH,CA.92647 11WITINGTON BEACII,CA.92641 ►165=b93=01• h65.13h=01 165:1 j:25 ANNE MARIE AnKLESS GABRIEL COREY -~ IT312 GISSUN 6942 TUCANA KING A41 TUCANA 69�12 T IIUIIT114GI011 PEACH,CA.92647 HUNTINGOTN BEACII,CA.92647 - IIIt1►MIGJTN E?FACII.CA.92647 _ 1 p6S=G�3�!'1 �;.'165�t3p.02� h65 13#=7G r FRED CORDOVA HARIKO ADAM3 17302 GIRSON GEORGE JAIIECEK 6951 TUCAHAH 18231 I YORYCREtST HUNMIGTON BEACII,CA.92647 IIUNTIt1CON BEACII,CA.92647 HUtirINOTON BEACH,C.A92647 A6S ie' ••0g3� 155-134-03 r .-ROBERT FRARZ � SAI HAU CHU CHIN MIMI JIM111 17311 0IES011 6922 TUCANA 6832 ROCK W1. 11UHMIGTON OE,ACH,CA,92647 9119TINGTON DEACH,A.92647 HUNTINGOTN BEACII,CA.92647 11165�093-"T9 165-134-04 155�13�::d1 FRAHK LAI CARL SAYIN DENNIS HOOTEII 6842 CAPSTONE 1416 SARAZEN 6842 ROCK HUNTINGTON BEAC}1,CA.9264T ALIIAH0R4,CA.91003 HUNTINGOTII BEACII,CA.92647 rn65j135 I 1 165-134.05, 1,1554132 W02+A .foHI1 CAHP COUPLES MOORS ROBERT HFHTZ ('852 CAPSTOIE 6931 CAPSTONE 6852 ROOK i HUNTINGTON PEACH,CA.92641 NUNTINGOTN UEACII,CA926h7 HUNTINGTON BEACII,CA.92647 A 65�135�0? A 65-134:05 4 65ZI 32,411 SCOT7 HC CLUAE !� >'AD1LOd DI PhOLA HANG KWAH 6067 CAPSTONE 17212 WIIFTMFIE I I I 18902 FLAGSTAFF IIUNTINGToll PEACH,CA.92647 IlUlITItIGTON BERCII,CA. 926117 HUIITINGTON BEACII,CA.92647 1i5•+'19i- a 1165 13A,o7 n6s-132«apt STMIEN ZAPFL CAti HERAJ TOGESII PARIKII 6082 CAPSTONE P.O. BOX 3110 68T2 000r. DR. 1JUNT1NGToN SEUCN.CA.92647 COSTA HESA, .CA. 92628 11UNTINr,0T12 nEACIi,CA.92647 .�16s�•s95�a� 163=�33=21 1t 165 lWa5 9-6 Z .. 1: CN JON SET AD61kS'S I NG(4723) 37-823 3 PART LABELS ��::rn.,t' �Iti r , � ►-- -- ; ' HAL DUIICAH GIIE:trtFR 3C111FR t1AtIpPF:D LIFTZ i 409 WARNED AVF 17232 ARGO CIR 11252 'JULIC ' HUNT111C,011 t1FACH,.CA9�07 1114►MIGOTH FEAC1I,C.A92G47 11UNTlirc�tltl El1AC11,CA.4264q f h6S�19z=P� :; I1111KO ►tFgET5C1?K0u .trrrpFY HURRAY WILLIAM JACKSON I: 6842 ROOK DR, 17222 ARGO 17242 JULIP 11JNTINGOTN E1M11,CA.92649 HUNTINOTON PE:AC;I,CA.92647 HUNTINGTON BEACII,CA.926b7 f�;�132c4T 165»T32'-1 q [`T 65=1 j2��D DAME 11L,"-MFR TERRY PETERSEN EUGENE HABICH 17201 TAURES 17212 ARCO CIP, 17232 JULIP 11UNTINGTO11 PEACII,CA.92647 HUNTINGTON SEACH,CA.9z647 HUNTINGOTN BEACH,C4.92547 �i5~1 •0ti 16;-13' 40 �i.b5:13t�11 P01?FRT KUROTA JAMS FINO T1101AS BLAKE 172ti TAURFG 17?O? AM 17222 JULIP HUNTINGOTN PEACN,CA.92647 HMIT111GT011 EPACII,CA.926117 11UHTINGTON BEAC11,CA.92647 h•GS=T 32-'32 DAVID SANDOR TANNER PETEPSEN POT SUDBERG 17221 TAURES 17211 ARGO 17212 JULIP HUNTINGTON BEACN,CA.92647 HUNTINGTON EPACII,CA92647 NUNTINGOTH BEACII,%cA'.92647 �tb5�1'32M 1C� A"'16S=T3?=33 •j•65-13z•22� RONALD 11APTIN JOHN BOWYER 17231 TAURES 17221 ARGO KENNETH ENGSTROH 11UNTI110TON BFACN,CA.92647 11UNTINGOTN BEACH CA.79Z6117 17202 JULIP t165-132=23 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA.92647 �1i �1 � T7 0165«132= 4 ALLF.N PRUSEWITZ ROPERT HOLINATTI 172_h1 TAURES HENRY RANSFORU 1fUNTINCOTFr BEACN,CA.92617 W-31 CARGO ti2t1 JULIP , HUNTINGTOR EBACII,CA.92647 livtrTlNco7ti PEactt,cA.92647, f65»tit-2� 365�13T-»18~ Y.E METH DIONIIF PATRICK APSTILL STEPHEN 11ARPER P.O. PDX 7.272 17241 ARGO 17221 JULIP SEAL PEACII,CA.90740 11MITINGTON EBACII,CA.92647 HUNTINGTON BEACII,CA.92647 11b5"•137�T3 ' * 155-�T32=�5 E165-73tr'19' --JOSEPH ZAPPALA _ JAIIF.S REIGEN 17271 TAURES 17251 ARGO CHARLES HOSTETTER HUNTINGI'01 DFAC11,CA.92.6141 11UNTMUT011 BEACH.CA.92647 17231 JULIP RTG'i��9�yid ti65-112 26 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA.92647 11I11G C111ANG III 17272 ARGO CIRL GARY HC FADDEN CORDON COLLIER HURTINGOTH BEACII,CA.92647 112T1 ARGO 172hl JULIP 6d5�►1�x•�5� IIUHTINGOTN PFACII,CA.92647 HUNTINGTON BEACII,C,A92647 t1b5=T3A��� RI65«1�1rt1 RAYHOND 11C CLIHTOCK � '[HOtiAa KIKI1CfII J011,r fCOCIS 17252 ARGO 17272 JULIP 17251 JULIP HUNTINrTON DEACH,C11.92647 1111IMPGOT11 HEACII,CAM647 IIUIITINGOTN BEACN,CA.92647 -131 rb5zi3ar-161p a165»132-25" i -.r yN ��pa�3: F;N,, ..i a..r,.lrr _. `_. ?A =`t'tsw�....a '`' 1 ... �,.,�• «'..,.-1� I'. n'tiwnFMw.w....�...,.�.+.....rw•RJ1�M.�.�w� ...r`r'rr'rr'r+w...+++.... .+..w>tl�fi'MtT� �- . f • . 1 C�P --- dtiM SST ADDRESSING �• � rh ! ., t ,��r� ',�. `r 37.923 (4723). 3 RANT LABELS .. ...r. .........n,,.„..,.... f1ICNAEL SHhNbLING ; 1T271 JULI P 1 ItUtttItiGOTN iiCACII,CA.92647 1 111CIIAEL LOCKARD tl 682? CAPSTONts' IIUNTINGOTH DEACII,CA.92647 VI) VANG 9842 CIIANCE CIR. IMUTINGOTII BEACiI,CA.92647 ' 16�iyf��•tl+ 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 � 1 � -f i ' t .,.il.�_t.:�a ,li � �yic � a. .t. e1, 1 �t+l+ y _. — - —�� ! - -. :�-. 1 ,_ .fr R}:, 1 - 1 v��,���J•t'' � r �' _ `t t 'c .r Lt-. r�u c� �;rk•rat,�,, w,a• ,r / y .,.. .., .... -.,. ne•. ... ,..�.. .....,.... "`^.' JSi3{:1 1 ..}� +'r7�ff+� �t�I=� {i• �r'lY�.;���i.a',"�'.t�'�1?'!�!t/.. F 1 � e ` L all n 1 n� kill"' r 1 ,• ......vr: .... ...r w;...•.,.�.•.rr•-�M 1 t' 1 S ei?�tR� i �ii(t { i'i A �' YR�i� 1! in I Al i+., 1 4 { l � I{ �{ R.. � � � 7 �� `I �• t (� 51�1 St lr � �R t,}tf rr �• r 4i� � r �-{! � WF.IVED Cif � , Y Clt"AxCITY OF �7 o j r` 4TI ZEN' S PETITION TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTQN BEACH f JULY 1986 We , the neighbors of Barbara Leonard sign this petition requesting that she be denied license to expand her day care center to 12 children . The `location of her place of business. at 1:242 Argo Circle is in the center of a residential neighborhood which Is zoned R--1 and designed for single family residences.. The specific concerns addressed by this petition are : 1 . Noise from the children which is disruptive to our households. 2 . Potential loss of property values . }} 3 . Additional traffic in our neighborhood. NAME ADDRESS 0011 ' 1 oc*At�-- OR C 4-Q: 1leivv. vy- r -=-{ { ? 9 ,4 4 ;; i . 1 i K�bCi14; CITY CLERt, CITY `7 2.e -�Ielsl ?10 July , 1986 Dear City Council Member : This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Beach in keeping businesses out of our K-1 Zoned neighborhoods . A case which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25 ) , is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood. I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace ar.d quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights. The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied i it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , i unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was opposed . This same request was denied by the Planning Commission and the City Council last year. There is no real difference between the license request last year and that which is being considered this year . Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance with legal requirements , however , those requirements do not reflect the wishes of Mrs . Leonard ' s neighbors;, the lose of home values, nor the effect of increased traffic and noise . I , a voting citizen in Huntington. Peach, request that you think of this as your neighbor-hood and consider the effect on your house- hold. Please deny Conditional Use Permit 86-25 and protect the integrity of my neighborhood . Sincerely, July, 1986 Dear City Ccuncil Member: This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Beach in keeping businesses out of our R-1 zoned neighborhoods. A case which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25) , is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood . I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace and quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights . The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied i It based upon the detrimental effect on property values , unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was opposed . This some request was denied by the: Planning Commission and the City Council last year. There is no real difference between the license request last year and that which is being considered this year. I Your staff has recommended Approval based upon compliance with legal requirements , however , those requirements do not reflect the wishes of Mrs . Leonard 's neighbors, the loss of home values , nor the effect of increased traffic and noioe. 1 , a voting citizen in Huntington Beach, request that you think of j this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house- hold . Please deny' Conditional Use Permit 86-�5 and protect the integriLY of my neighborhood . Sincerely, r, fi Cz, July, 1986 Dear City Council Member: This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizenu of Huntington Beach in keeping businesses out of our R-1 Zoned neighborhoods . A case which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25) , is asking you to allow a daycare -facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood . I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed o-f single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace and quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights . ' The City Planning Co-.vission reviewed this case and denied it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was f opposed. This name request was denied by the Planning Commission ar.,d the City Council last yea::. There is no real difference between the license request last year and that which is being ; ) r considered this year. i 1 s Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance with legal requirements, however, those. requirements do not _. B 1 reflect the wishes of Mrs. Leonard ' s neighbors ; the loss of home ! values, nor the effect of increased traffic and noise . 1 , a i voting citizen in Huntington Beach, request that you think of this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house- hold. Please deny Conditional Use Purmit 86-25 and protect the ' integrity of my neighborhood . 1 Z 4 Sincerely, { Ef 1 f 1 Judy , 1986 Dear City Council Member: This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of hintington Beach in keeping businesses out of our R-1 Zoned neighborhoods. A case which is currently under consideratio►i by the council (CUP 86-25 ) , is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood . I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed i.o provide peace and quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights . 1 The City Planning Commission reviewze this case and dNn*.ed It based upon the detrimental effect on property values , unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was upposed . This same request was denied by the Planning Commission !, and the City Council Last year. There is no real difference but:ween the license request last yzar and that which is being considered this year. Your staff has recommended approval, based upon compliance with legal requirements , however , those requirements do not reflect the wishes of tars . Leonard ' s neighbors , the loss of home values, nor thi effect of increased traffic and noise . 1 , a voting citizen in Huntington Beach, request that you think of this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house- hold. Please deny Conditional Use Permit 86-25 and protect the Integrity of my neighborhood . 5 inceroly , r t =� - . - a _ - _ . • yf •► },_, w'.�;.J,�j��./ lw 'SMt-tea-� '. 0111cs of the City Clark. d7`�0 J86 ;3�.;. . : : ;: 3N� ' t t Y'r nfi t}t fj r•• r s tV` .►�r..t1 T fit 'of ern in tt�n Burch �8a , .,• . �, . } .�t Y ar.Q.�oX 1� cu;FJRihA92648 Hn iFtip- LARDING D D F NuN��.l_� �o �ar>►z�t�n 92647 . 474 5 -- �I IItit Ti�t?O�ON CCr1, CA ;�' �i BRAIN waoa c'�+�` 6921 TUC �. tiQ ORDER iv UNTINGOTP BEACH CA-926�s7'�'� ' MOVE Lc 1— _ � 33 f. .. i��5tlF1;1�lENS (►Onr . . rtr•t,T-�i, t111'.{;1Q'111 LEAD 'A 151163N1 07/11/8b RETURN TO SENDER ! ;. No F13E�LiAf;DING ORDER ON FILE ' 'UNAF-:LE TO FORWARD r i I -- • v� ! s'•e• .ir:t�ii�.".i{' '�:: %1' cis ` ..... ..... David Sandor gux�t irigton Beach , 92 47 July 21 , 1986 �G4ri Huntington Beach City- Council �w Huntington Beach Civic Center ' 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California Re: Conditional Use Permit jehocation: 17242 ergo Circ ...r I ��.......�... ,r .r...,..��.�....��.............� t Since I am recovering from major surgery, I am unable ;.o at,amend this hearing today„ However, my position on tonight ' s p1roposa3 has not changed. I am still categoricallyopposed to the applicant ' s r equest, to operate a , arge iami J aay care Home of up to 12 'c'aildreu in an existing family home . 1rhis is a residential neighborhood not a business area, and we have the right to a reasonably peaceful . enviror-ment. With 12 small children in one residence there is bound to be a lot of noise . I am working often at night , since I have a rotating work shi.fz. Therefore , it is often necessary that I sleep during the day. 1 cannot afford C-o be kept awake by a lot of noise. ',.Right now, however, 1 will need pec*t(:e and quiet more Conan ever, since I have a long . recovery ahead '.--,f me from major surgery. ley family and I have been living ),-.e. a since 1 i 1 . We chose to live here because we wanted to live ir, a friendly, nice , and quiet neighborhood. It has been zhat- up to now. h child care facility for up to 12 children is a noisy business , and as such should by overa toed in an area zoned for business. Let me ask you l Members of the City Council, would you 'like to have a day care center of up to 12 small ,children near your back. yard? Sincerely David Sandor .00 V n I�u.....t;`.,tjy+v.. .:i7ll;a_. .:.,..,ate}aRwn..w.r.Tw"• r1" _ .n...t.,,._.......,.<.71!i 'J,•-t3Vvr)v.%;•,.•.. +... +....ry-_ _:._'. ..r...: `..,.J.'.,. t .. •:...:r ,1.17r7 ay.l".YY. .. ^:;: .": .. 11VW , . 1,. ', .ti+. wl'f4Mf.w1}..e.. .. 1.1.1{►•i•- -__ •.... -.�r4 .. ....... ..wwrr.+w J. 'f\ • . :..- .-..•. . '.ter.:'.hr•...!' •.'. .•{ !•..•.•.)JAL:N. ... ,,.•,.a.a•u.G .,ate•. , , :{ .. ;,- �I a . 3 leg CITY OF �UiM'�1l�I�k."� BE.Ac"INTER•DEPAnTMENT CO' MMUNI�' ION C40 Iwo �xu�wcTo, win+ f .3Q /A'I�At+�50S i tfMfr'� A y- 6 To Charles W. Thompson lames W. Palin, Director City Administrator � Development Services Subject STAFF' S ;RECOMMENTY4 i'ON FOR Date November 17, 1986 MODIFICATION TO CORE AMENDME NO. 66-30 - LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE USES (AGENDA ITEM D•-2d ) Code P.mendment No. 86--30 is scheduled for today's City Council meeting., Attached is a draft version of the ordinance for Cede Amendment No . 86--30 which demonstrates staff recommendatio;i For, inclusion of .the three items defeated by Plznni.ng Commission which are being recommended by staff to be included back into the ordinance. The proposed modifications have been inserted into Section 9634 No. 11 9 and 10 on page ` and 3 of the draft ordinance . Section 9634 lists provisions governing family day care homes for more than six children . Listed below is an explanation of the proposed modifications . I 9634 Family day care homes for more than six children are subject j to the following provisions: (1 ) That provision ( 1 ) be amended to state that a_ six , foot high masonry wall is required to enclose the outdoor play area , rather than a five foot high fence or wall whenever adjaicent to other residential uses . A masonry wall is necessary to reduce noise impacts on the surrounding homes. ( 9 ) That provision ( 9) be amended to state not only that approvals for family day homes shall be non--transferable , but also that the dwelling shall be owner-occupied. The owner of the home is the person best able to accomrnolate the requirements for day care homes. (10) That a provision be added to state that in addition to the two required fully, enclosed parking spaces , a mtnimum of two on-site parking spaces shall he provided . This requirement simply ensures , that the driveway be `clear for an aide'r, car and/or for dropping off and picking up children. above stated provisions were reviewed` by the Plannina The , 1986 budG were . y P 9 , n t ..' Commmission ��: the ' ubl,ic �hearin on,. Qc9°bhat2the .;City Council . y included b them. odifications is ofor regulating famlly ' day care homes include the three m "for, More, than six children. ar p. . i / Y elopmen ., ' Attached � is the. draft ordinance p re ed` b Dev t Servi ces .- staff The proposed modifications have" be'en;.unde' rlined in the' draft - ordinance. Attachment JWps,FW: kla , (Gi60d ) t � , ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE IIUNTINGTOM,.;BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9630 'AND ADD THERETO NEW SECTIONS 9634 and 9635 RELATED TO DAY CARE USES The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows : SECTION 1 . The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby amender by amending Section 9630 and adding thereto new Sections 9634 and 9635 9630 PERMITTED USES. The following list includes uses that possess Character is ice of such unique and special form as to make impractical their automatic inclusion as a permitted use , in any district. The location and operation of such uses shall be subject to approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission and any additional provisions included herein . Uses marked with an asterisk shall not be permitted in any residential district . A. *Airports and heliports •c C. Churches Colleges, private schools, elementary and secondary public schools ( Minimum 10% of parking area shall he landscaped for the above uses . ) 'Contractor ' s storage yards pursuant to Section 9631 AConvalescent hospitals and sanit"oriums *Commercial recreation and amusement enterprises , including bowling alleys and skating rinks 40141001HYxxd,r 1 s�,�z, ,a � z��; ,��r,�x zzi� iz �s� , s i;�►�� f; ��ix��xir���rs/rs��d,���e�;�xz,r� x�c�i,��x�i�rs���/,�N'>�zx 1 t D . Day care .uses . Family day care homes for more than six . children pursuant to section 9634. Child care . facilities other than family day care homes pursuant to Section 9635. G. *Golf driving ranges; miniature golf course:. H. *Health clubs over 2 , 500 sq . ft . Horticulture Hospitals K . *Kennels , animal hospitals or clinics M . *Mulching operations pursuant to Section 9631 Flu:eums O. *Open air or drive-in theaters P. Parking lots *Post offices *Private clubs and lodges Private recreation areas or other uses for exclusive use of homeowners Public utility substations of lese-2 than one acre, excluding switchyards R . *Radio or television transmitters (commercial ) *Recreational vehicle parks subject to locational criteria adopted by resolution *Rest homes Retail nurseries (do not require conditional use permit if in a commercial district ) Rooming or boardinq houses , exrept in low density I residential districts T . *Transportation terminals U . Utility facilities, pablic or private , including but not limited to waste-water treatment plants , power generating plants, and pump stations . W. F;ind energy conversion systems pursuant to Section 9633 9634 Family day care homes- for more than six children are subject to the following provisions: . 1 . Seventy-fdve square feet of outdoor play area per;;'. child. Thirty five square feet of indoor .'play:�area,`,per:; child. hi�hofenceaorare' a shall be ,grr,assscdaa d enclosed by a 'five foot n g When - � is adjacent• to, a r6� i'dential' use a Six ',loot highm,masonry. wa ;, s>;reauireTto enc ve the pISX area . Any entry gate shall be ,sequrely fastened. '- Thc,`total enrollment fot the family day care ',hom.+: a shall conform to state law . -2 3., The appltcant shall s>>bmit clearance from the Fire Department and a copy of the orange county Social. Services License, prior to the operation of the family day care home . 4 . Su.-:h facility shall not be located closer than 600 feet to another large family day care home. 5 . Garages shall not be .used as a designated play area or used in calc'41ating minimum .quire footage in a family day care home. S. Loading and unloading of `child.en from vehicles shall only be permitted on the driveway , approved parking area or directly in front of the facility . 7. The family day care home shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 8 .40 , noise control of the Municipal code. 8 . The Planning commission reserves the right to revoke the approval. of a family day care home if a violation of the conditions of approval occurs. All revocation proceedings shall be preceded by a public hearing. 9 . Approvals for family day care homes are non-transferable and the dwellinc_unit shall be owner occupied . 10. A minimum of two on-site parkings aces shall `be provided in add tion to the two required fully enclose parkinct spaces. 9635 Child care facilities other than family day case homes a er subject to the follcwing provisions: 1 . Seventy-five square feet of outdoor play area per ,. child. Thirty five square feet of indoor play area per child. outdoor play area shall be grassed and enclosed by u six foot high masonry wall.. Artygate entry shall, be securely fastened . 2, minimum 10t cf parking area shall be landscaped. 3. The total enrollment for the child care facility shall be established by the Planning commission . 4, Fire Department clearance shall be obtained prier ..to "the operation of the child care facility. 5 . Hours ar operation shall be established 'by the Planning Commission. o . The applicant shall submit a copy of the 'orange 'County Social .Services License prior to the operation , of,. the child care facility. 7. F scant ,.shall, 'ot'tain' ,a business license prior ,.,:o the operatlon ►of the child care facility, ; ,3� 8. off-street parking for child care faci1 tales shall comply with Article 960 . 9 . Loading and unloading of children shall only be f permitted fro-n approved parking areas, 106 Children attending the day care fa.:iiity shall be restricted to designated play areas only , unless supervised by as adult: I 11. The child care facility shall comply with all applicable i requirements of Chaptzr, 8:440 , noise control of the Municipal Code, 129 The Planning Commission reserves the right, to revoke th,e approval of a child care facility if 'a violation of the conditions of approval occurs . All revocation proceedings shall be preceded by a public hearing. SECTION 3 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day or , 1986. I ' Mayor i ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4 t f City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED City Administ ator Director of Development Services (6660d 11/13/86 , 1 , f A , • r LAW 0"ICZ9 1 r ' J eu MORRISON & FOE NSTER SAN ANCIRCC 003 30UT1t GRAND AV1 HUH YONZ XONO W"KINCTWI. D.C. Los ANoELxn, CAW'ORPRA 00071 WCOULAN3 K%U&S DX"VXX TNLerllalnt(via)inn-aaAO 10"A JT cNselt Mato-Moro us July 21, 1986 WKITcx'ri 011119cT DIAL xvKaz. (2 13 )621-9433 Mayor and City Council Members City of Huntington `Beach 30143 Crown Valley Parkwa,,/ Laguna Niguel, California" 92677 Re: 'Conditional Use P'j miit No. 86, -25 i Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: -- I an •an attoiney assisting Ms.(_Ea3ibiar& Leonard with .regard to her -application for a con&-tiona-1-use--permit (referred to as "CUP" hereafter) for a large family day care home . For t-he reasons stated below I respectfully request that you grant Ms. Leonard a CUP for a day care home in her residence . FACTU" BACKGROUND On February 1, 1985 Ms. Leonard first applied for a CUP for child day care of seven to twelve persons. At that time, and until May 2, 1986, Ms. Leonaxcd was without'the assistance of counsel. On February 6, 1985, .the Planning Commission' (referred to as "Commission"- hereafter) sent out notices of a public Bearing concerning `CUP No . 85-3, to neighbors within 300 feet of Ms. Leonard' s residence. The notice, alerted neighbors of her application for. a "day care facility. " On March 5, 1985, the Huntington Beach Development services Department Staff issued a report recommending T-?proval of C'JP 85-3 with modifications The report •found that: (1 ): there would be no detrimental `: affects.._on health, welfare, safet and convenience of persons or, roperty value ; Y, P, . p (2) ; that the conditional use;,,is; consistent w�.th ' the goals { •and` obj'ect3wes ,of ,the , generel`,'plan' and Article 933'l of the Huntington: Beach Ordinance Code; (3) ,_tha;=.there •could be o' %iridue,;tiaffic problems caused .by_the day, care: home"since n p no 'two:,paren+s pick ;up or drop off -their ctaildren_ at the . . same time; and `(4 ) that the proposed . ulae wns compatible Ath existing and proposed uses of the neighborhood. The report y 1 .,.. ..• ':..... -•...i..,1.-. ,. ,,,.....,«..:. .,,•.•. ,.,n .r. ...,,... ....,... . .wee.►`. 1 . 1^^.ww« ..e..- ..w-n.... a....,.. « N 'mORRrsox & FOARSTUR Mayor and City Council. Members City of Huntington Beach .Jury 21, 1986 Page 2 also recommended that -the following ncodifications be m�r,'�• . ( 1) that the site plan.. of January 14, 1985 tie -used; (z ) t: a,Z. Ms . Leonard be licensed by Orange County; (3 ) that the mission-(reserve the right to rescind; and (4) . that, the care home be limited to 10 children. The staff arrived at the limit of 10 children by applying Section 9331 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code with regard to the inside arp `45f Ms. Leonard's home . All of there modifications were acceptable to Ms . Leonard. At the Planning Commission hearing .held on March 5 , 1985, Albert Brusewitz and two othAr neighbors ;.opposed the grant of a permit for the first time. They complained that noisy children had a detrimental impact .on sleep and property values. Mr. Brusewit2 also presented a ,, petiti'6n oppo ed..to the noise children, preeented. Ms. Leonard, surprxsed by the opposition, was unprepared to document local *uppert. The CUP was denied four to zero. with three counsel: members absent, on tha basis of findings Which directly cont r'adicted . the findings of the Development. Services staff. The minutQs of j the hearing indicated that Chairman Livengood based`his�, deci- sion against granting the permit on the grounds of protecting privacy in the cul-de-sac and because there was neighborho:id opposition. On March 22, 19851 : Ms. Leonard filed. -a request for City Council appeal . Again' the staff viewed' the 'granting of the CUP favorably, with the additional condition that an essist&vit be hired once there were more th an ,'s'ix children. Ms . Leonard indicated her agreement to this .60ndit16n. , Ms . .Leonard sent letters in support of her appeal on`March 12 and '13 , 1985 to the Mayor and City Counsel Members stating: (1) that there was no rior notice to, her of the neighbors ' complaints; (2 ) that as many as 10 neighboring home owners ` supported her; (3 ) . that Mr. and Mrs. Brusewi,tz were. persen. ally angry at Ms. Leonard for a previous c.amplai.at• about their weeds encroaching �:on her property; and (V that after ;talking with 'neighboring, homeowners, five of those who had -previously Big ned .the ` etiil6ia resented` by Mr. Brlsewitz reversed their pea j.tion and signed a petition in Ms. Leonard.I s favor. Two that refused to sign Ms . Leonard' s petition did so,, not because , , traffic problems, but because they-:.were afraid of£an day ccore center: and tha..`bi;� lousiness th ,t the word "large" implied. Another neighbor refused '•to._sign Senate Bill No. 1G3__ G:....�...._� ' CHAFTE-11 1233 Asl act to amend Sections 1597.51, 1597.52, IST454,raid 1597.61 of, to amend and renumber Sections 1597.50 and .1597.501 of, to add • :, ,;:,. • :'� Sections 1597.35, 1597.45, 1597.46, 1597.47, and 1597.63 to, and to re- r.,: : '.:',._'• peal Section 1597.63 of,the Health and Safety Code,relating to fainily :: :•.• _ _' : day care homes. ?� (Approved by Governor September"r -IM Filed'vAth` Secretary of Stile 5eptembes 49.19M.1 LECISUMVE COUNSEL'S DICYSI' SB 163, %Vntson. Runily day care homes. (1) Under existing law,all family day care homes for children are • L • • •+ required to be considered a residential use of property for the +.•. purposes of local zoning and no conditional. use permit or special •: ` ` • _• exception may be required for such residences. �_'�•� !�_ i - -- The bill would classify family day care homes into two classes,large family day care homes and small family day care homes. It would,in _ relation to a large farzli3y day care home, authorize a local government to classify those homes us a permitted use of residential property for zolAng purposes,`grant a permit to use residential property to such a home that complies v:ith specified local ordinances and specified provisions of state law and any regulations �_ • F; •• • • • • • • • • • • • a adopted by the State Fire Marshal pursuant thereto,or require such ' • a home to apply for a permit to use the residential property. f.1 (2) Ex-isting law requires family day care holncs to furnish • evidence that the home contains a fire extingulsticr 'or stnokQ `�•�.:.,u.�::.`: detector device, or both,which meet standards established by the e State Fire Marshal. Licensed community care facilities which provide nonmedical board, room and care for six or fewer ambulatory children are not subject to certain standards and requirements of the State.Fire Marshal. _ . A This bill.would specify that small family day care homes are not �... . . . subject to such standards and requirements of ttte State Fir'Marshal. '. The bill would require that large family. day care homes be '' •.• it:�-.� t• '��� • considered 'as single family residenves foi purposes of the State ••• �' --I Uniform Building Standards Code and local building and fire codes, except with•respeet to certain additicaal fire and liksafetystandards of ithc State Fire Marshal. The bill would also provide that the use of n single-family dwelling for-a small Family day care home shall not constitute a change of occupancy for the:purposes of the State Housing Uw•or for purposes I es of local building codes. It would also provide that,the use of rt single-family dwelling for a large family clay dare !tome shall not . constitute a change of occupancy for the purposes of the State . . .... ....•.p 91 40 •� •t . .•t�.• ..ai�rfl•:-'�!�!�'�,t4•r,: ;:S;it�".,•�,1N,,�i�rrr:.s•ei�lni��i�i�'l�fft`s!�i1F, '' •11 t s •!r f' 11•• ;a'• • ••.!.' ,:• !!. •!S ':=fit•' ,,•�:•. !. '.,1,t'�Z,Z,•� .•t•:• • i:• �: '• . :.� • . •: • }•t•• •Zl1� • •. �1::=•••••.( _. 2= Z�ji ` _ .fit .'• ,• • rr' j •'•,�,• •'r:• • � � •.. .r•� }: .. .. .� :�_•!•,�,r, �,. .•r: •',L =1�,, - J ,f ,1 t Ch. 1233 2 that ins Low or for the of local building or fire codes and Housing r t''�• a large 'family day. care home skull not be subject to the � provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. Tlie bill would, in addition, provide fur further enforcement produr ores. The ceg it he bill would impose a state•manduted local program - by misdemeanor for any person to violate in a specified manner'the family day care han.c licensingprovisions. (3) Article X1I111 of the California Constitution and Sections 2231 and 2234 of the Revenue and Taxation'Code require the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Other provisions require the Department of Finance to review statutes dis^laiming these costs and provide, in certain cases, for making claims to the State Board of Control for reimbursement. 1 However, this bill would provide that no appropriation is made � and no reiinbursernent is required by this act For a specified reason. t The people of the Stare of California do enact as follo«•s: � SECTION 1. Section 1597.50 of the Health and Safety Code is s amended and renumbered to read: 1597.30. The Legislature finds and i;�cclnres-. t (a) It has a responsibility'to ensure the health and safety of children in family homes that provide day care. (b) That there are Insufficient numbers of regulated family day s� care homes in California. z (e) There will Lea rowing need for child day rare Facilities due a to the increase in woVins parents. s1 (d) J Aainy parents prefer child day care located in their ri • ' neighborhoods in family }tomes. d' (e) There should be a variety of child care sgttings, including regulated family day care homes,as suitable alternatives for parents. tc (1) That the program to be operated by the state should be cost j e� effective, streamlined, and simple to administer in order to ensure ai adequate care for children placed in fam:ly day care homes, while r not placing undue burdens on the providers. i a (g) That. the state should maintain an"efficient program of tIS , regulating family day rare homes that ensures the,provision of •, adequate protection, supervision, and guidance to children in their S o� homes. nil SEC. 2. Section 1597.35 is added to-the Health and Safety Code, 1 fo to read: , . I ` 1597.35. For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: f to (a) "Department" means the State Department of Social •! Services. . hi (b) "Director" m ns the Director of Social Services. (c) "Family day cale" means regularly provided care,protection �� Ch. 1233 re cado nnd• and supervision 2 or fewer children,in th vider's own home, _b'ect to the for periods of- less zn 24 hours per , while the parents or ,� guardians are away, an Includes th lowing: -nforce meant (1) "Large family day h e" which means a home which cal program provides fatni!y day care to s to 12 children, inclusive,Including I a specified children who reside at a Its e, as defined in departmental regulations. actions 2231 { (2) "Small faml ay care home" ich means a home which :he state to provides family care to six or fewer c ren, including children -rtain costs Who reside le home, as defined in depar ental regulations. partment of (d) "Pl ing agency"means the agency desi ated pursuant to provide, in Section 100 of the Covernment Code. Control for Zhoc rovider" means a person who operates a family day care d is licensed or registered pursuant to the provisions of this ion d r made on SEC. 3. Section 1597.501 of the Health and Safety Code is amended and renumbered to read: `A 1597.40. (a) It is the intent oft lie Legislature that family day care , homes for children must be situated in normal residential 2ty Code is surroundings so as to give children the home environment which is conducive to hcalthy and safe development. It is the public policy of this state to provide children in n family day care home the stone d safety of home environment as provided in a traditional home setting. The Legislature declares this policy to be of statewide concem family day with the purpose of occupying::ne field to the exclusion of municipal zoning, building and fire codes and regulations governing the use or acilities due occupancy of far-nil), day care homes for children, except as specifically provided for in this chapter, and to prohibit any .. d in their restrictions rcliting to the use of single-family residences for family day care homes for children except as provided by this chapter. s, including 1 (b) Every `rovision in a written Instrument entered into relating for parents• to real propc4 which purports to forbid or restrict the conveyance, ould be cost encumbrance,leasing,or mortgaging of such real property for use or :r to ensure occupancy as a family day care: home for children, is void and every omes, while restriction or prohibition in tviy such written instrument as to the use or occupancy of the property.as it favoily day care home for children program of is void. provision of • (c) Every restriction or prohibition entered into,whether by way of coverumt, condition upon use or occtt :ur transfer of ic , or upon !ten in their p p y p title to real property, which restricts or ptohibits directly, or ;atet Code., indirectly limits, the acquisition, use,or occupancy of such property y for a family day care home for children is void. . 9. Section 1597.45 is adds tltc� Health and Safety Code, definitions to rear . • P.3► 'r he fol Ig $ ha11 apply to small family day care of Social 7 ys homes: (a) The use gle-Fam f�� once as a small f arnily day care " home shal considered a rest en f property for the protection 91 70 91 100 CRIMINAL PENALTIES F'OR VIOLATION OF THE Li NSING STATUTE Background; Prior 1981, criminal pe y provisions in the community care licensing law applied to mily day a homes. in 1981, the licensing provisions governing family day cart a ended and removed from the general community care provisions of the stat The criminal penalty provisions were not 'incor— porated into the 1981 sc e. Current Lavr. 163 reinstates crn inal penalties for willful or repeated violations a e licensing statutes or regu ions in a manner which is determined to thr the h^alto and safety of the chit n in care. A person violating the stot can be: found guilty of a misdemeanor an punished by a fine of up to $506 or up to 180 days in jail. DEED RESTRICTIONS PROHIBITING USE OF HOME FOR FAMILY DAY CARE Bockgrou h Often deeds in a particular subdivision, contain provisions which restrict the use of the home to residential purposes and/or prohibit business uses of <' the home. These provisions are sometimes invoked to stop family day core in a particular subdivision or condominium complex. 1981 changes In the family day care statutes contained provisions which made void any private deed restrictions (also known as C, C & R's and restrictive covenants) which prohibited the use of property for family day care if the deed restriction was . entered into after June 28, 1981. Current Law: Under current law every restriction or prohibition entered into at ant time which prohibits the use of property as a family day cage home for children is void. This meons that a homeowners association or neighbors in a subdivision ' cannot clos e down a family day home because of a deed provision which restricts the use of the property. to residential uses, or prohibits business uses, no matter , when the property was purchased. , . • � r • ... Iw AEI M`+N..A1.ntrr....,.. .. RE MU 1 1936 rM Off W NT•NGTON BEACH .COUNCIL OFFICE _ July, 1986 Dear City Council Member: This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Beach in keeping busgineases out of our R-1 Zoned neighborhoods. A case Which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25) 1, is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood . ; I feel that such a facility* in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace - and ` quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights. The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied h it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , a unacceptable noise levels, and because the neighborhood was opposed. This same request was denied by the Planning Commission and the City Council last year . There is no real difference between the license request last year and that Which is being considered this year . Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance with legal requirements, however, those requirements do not reflect the wishes of Mrs . Leonard ' s neighbors , the loss of home , values , nor the effect of increased traffic and noise . Z , a voting citizen in Huntington Beach , request that you think of this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house- hold . Please deny- Conditional Use Permit 86--25 and protect the integrity of say neighborhood. ,t1 i Sincerely , l SE. t,-• a r :� r♦ .�... t. a Y i k'�....,,. ...,,,.,a yY `.Y.t•y:t'si-...•....'.�........�:.;.d:?'rf..��+'.i.. � ..:.,u.S3�,^... . t.. - July, 1966 Dear City Council. Member: This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Beach in keeping businesses out of our R-1 Zoned neighborhoods . A case which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25) , is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood. I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace and quiet to its residents is dust a violation of my privacy rights . f The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied r it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , t unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was opposed . This same request was denied by the Planning Commission ` G and the City Co+,ncil last year. There is no real difference between the license request last year and that which is being ' considered this year. Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance j With legal requirements, however , those requirements do not s reflect the wishes 3f Mrs . Leonard ' s neighbors , the loss of home values , nor the effect of increased traffic and noise. _ I , a 1 'voting citizen in Huntington Beach, request that you think of this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house- hold . Please deny Conditional Use Permit 86-25 and protect the integrity of my neighborhood . Sincerely, Ge41-c'k- 1.. lyr. .s,e.: ., T..+ .. . ,. rc• ,,.. �,+S,q yl.,... r•.-.s : �t1Jis:rk .�,�4'..:�flTl.:a'MiMn1w.....•.,. .. ... .d: AUG VVU�IN�ON 1}EAC' C1 CIS OOUIyr OF SCE July, 1986 Dear City Council Member: This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Beach in keeping businesses out of our R-1 Zoned neighborhoods. A case which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25) , is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood . I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace and quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights . I' The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was apposed . This same request was denied by the Planning Commission and the City Council last year. There is no real difference between the license request last year and that which is being considered this year. Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance with legal requirements , however , those requirements do no: reflect the Wishes of Mrs. Leonard ' s neighbors , the loss of home i values, nor the effect of increased traffic and noise. I , a voting citizen in Huntington Beach, request that you think of this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house- hold. Please deny- Condl.tional Use Permit 86-25 and protect the integrity of my neighborhood. Sincerely , - t: V. ..�U+- •�t•',i:alfia►" .,.',,....../ .,:.: .. �... a„�tlF�.f4'l4;�'.. . �d Y :'__. 'f�t:_itiwwtis4•?r`...`C�j7r4,4!{fery,, y 1 July,, 1986 Dear City Council Member : This letter is a request than: you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Reach in keeping businesses out of our R-1 Zoned neighborhoods . A cane which is currently under consideration by the nouncil (CUP 86-25 ) 9 is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood. I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace and quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights . The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was opposed . This same request was denied by the Planning Commission and the City Council last year. There is no real difference between the license request Last year and that which is being considered this year. Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance with legal requirements, however , those requirements do not reflec . the wishes of Mrs . Leonard' s neighbors , the loss of home values , nor the effect of increased traffic and noise. 1 , a voting citizen in Huntington Beach, request that you think of this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house-- hold. Please deny ' Conditional Use Permit 86-25 and protect the integrity of my neighborhood . Sincerely , i f l., ,. —�`• 1. � � �" , i LAW oi►rtcEs or V NIORmsaw 40-c FOERSTER "M raANCISCO Una SOUTH URAND AVEXUE U a Xama WASr'1220M.V. o,C. Los AYC3kLES, CALIFORNIA 00071 W0CVL&1K1U HILLa 31P.1`VL'ti ?6LC1111074Z(fella)Qua•01100 1caLNtJT Ct3E1fR Lt]1AON rELzx t0•t287 October 14 , 1986 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach , California 92648 Re : Barbara Leonard ' s Application for Conditional Use Permit- 86-25 Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 1094 .6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure , as Barbara Leonard ' s attorney , I am requesting that the complete record of the proceedings " I before the City of Huntington Beach City Council concerning Barbara Leonard ' s appeal of the denial by the Planning Commission of her application for conditional use permit No. 86-25 be prepared. In accordance with Section 1094 . 6 , the record prepared should include transcripts of all City Council proceedings concerning ifs. Leonard 's application, including, without limitation, proceedings held on July 21 , 1986, August 4 , 1986 and October 6 , 1986, all pleadings, all notices and orders , any proposed decision by the Planning Commission and/or City Council , the final decisions of the Planning Commission and the Citv Council, all admitted exhibits , all rejected exhibits in the possession of the City Council or the Planning Commission , all written evidence, including, without limitation , any reports made by the staffs of the Department of Human Services or the Planning Commission and any letters submitted to the City Council or Planning Commission in connection with Ms . Leonard ' s application, and any other papers in the case . Thank you very much For your cooperation in this matter. Please notify me of any costs incurred in preparation of the record . Very truly-.you s , l Alice C. Hill for MORRISON & :OERSTER ACN/lhp Enclosure r . . t ♦ rrr �Pit t 3 � t ? �✓ ✓Z/L� (�G�'(..fi�c// Z 4 L� L:.����G�``r" l_/ I �'i i 4,VO4" .L_ L %Xlwi �.� : r`r..�.... .. -�rt;.v �-.�� _t fr....'• r...r,.'.a . �.+�. F a�w..+. ;• _'Y.... .: . . .y __ __ _ •^'yTr s4•I+...'•''rMM'�K.f.•. ..�•Ml3�Si/A`Y'd. . , . 11 ',' - �' i.�-C�-. �.�... �iu�,.-� ..�.c��--ram.-•- ��r AL OF 10 Lw Z-'C I r c�.�,-����..�!�.r.'�E? �'.�7 tom' ����-�` (• • .. , . . ... -�. .'. �_ tar r / C>:11E RK C I T r i',^, CITI ZENe S PETITION TO THE CITY OF HIJNTINGTON BEACH ., .; JULY 1986 We , the neighbors of Barbara Leonard sign th is ' petition ;regvasti nq that .. she be ed license to expand her day care 'center to 12 children * den i The � location of her place of business &t 17242 Argo Circle Is i n the . cen ter of '"a residential neighborhood which Is icned R-1 and desi gnrd for single firmly residences . The specific concerns addressed by this petition are 1 . Noise from the children which is di srup : i ve to our housvhol'ds: 2. Potential loss of property values . 3. Additional traffic in our nciahborhood. NAME ADDRESS 1C P2 f 'i t -7 Zfi Cla� . ! I/mo,.A/pp�J��'1��� � _ j1�.,�.7�//�,..�j r�� dr, -1� IYA 71 Xz, Y. 7r;. 0& •mow//yr . . 6a . ._ sa.4C1s,:}!.. .+ 'LM•n.iK.•C.r.+tM:e,.♦r•.s. +.-Y+r.:w.N-r.•.:... .,.........v.;•".,,.. �•�...,l1 .Ni^.F. ,,. --"!st1..:�fi,.mr*tilt!wN.+.,iYij ?".vtFs+". Y^"'+.'��c,_....,..• ,.',k� „�'f`�""+'�f.S. . 'e July, 1986 Dear City Council Member: -This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Beach in keeping businesses out of our R-1 Zoned neighborhoods. A case which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25 ) , is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood . I ' feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwel31ngs and is designed to provide peace and quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights . The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , unacceptable noise levels , and because the neighborhood was opposed . This same request was denied by the Planning Commission azzd the City Council last year. There is no real difference between the license request last year and that which is being considered this year. Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance with legal requirements, however , thoce requirements do not reflect the wishes of Mrs . Leonard ' s neighbors, the Loss of home values , nor the effect of increased traffic and noise . I , a voting citizen is Huntington Beach, request that you think of this as your neighborhood and consider the effect on your house- hold. Please deny Conditional Use Permit 86-25 and protect the integrity of my neighborhood . Sincerely , i y1�4IY,� , Is CITIO{SIN-fS PETITION TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH . � •; �� `,V,J�4,�� DULY 1986 Cs Idti., e neighbors of Barbara -Leonard sign th i s ape t i t i on`,requestl ng < th&t s ti denied l i tense ` to expand her day care center ` to 12 ch i l dren The location `of her place of business at 17242 Aargo Circle Is In the center of z residential neighborhood which Is zoned R-1 and des i geed for single family residences. The specific concerns addressed by this petition are s r 1 . Noise from, the children which is disruptive to our households . . 2. Potential 1 loss of ro er t values. P P Y 3. Additional traffic i n our neighborhood . i RAKE ADDRESG s ��.... _._._ .art +a, r-- Gam- A La 4- f OL GEE 012 Ao k &AL TW 4,-XVV tt Aff I ,('-t U 6�,.-V P, D,X, 77 Y.I1 r.-;1}` .+..ic, i. ;/ ... .e . .<. ., ,r2i� 1 — .'y—. —_ — l..♦ ' �V t +_ s °_ . - .. ''st a+ 1r 'fy .�. .t 1 J i n 1 :M'Lr.+, yt''x`i7.i f t1Mt !•:. � r y . ,-.l. CiTIZEN'S Pb"TITION TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON EEACH JULY 1986 We , the neighbors of Barbara Leonard sign this petition requesting ; that she be denied license to expand her day care center to ' 12 `chi,ldren . . The location - of he'r place of business at 17242 Argo Circle Is In the center ' of a residential neighborhood which is zoned R-1 and designed for single family 'residences . The specific concerns addressed by this petition aret ' 1 . Noise from the children which Is disruptive to our households . 2. Potential loss of property values . 3 . Additional traffic In our neighborhood. NAME ADDRESS i M (c SLR 1 02 7b v12,v-� 4.,.v ocrAIC t D4 �r ti l� — t 1 r1 1 t .... tz 1 1 a •i s ,�, ,Gg iYV � a i _— r.� •a_ _ " CITIZEN'S PETITION TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH JULY 1986 We , the neighbors of Barbara Leonard sign this petition requesting that she be denied license to expand her day care center to 12 children . The location of her place of business at 17242 Argo Circle is in the center of a-residential neighborhood which Is zoned R-1 and designed for single .' family residences . The specific concerns addressed by this petition acre : 1 . Noise from the children which Is disruptive to our households . 2. Potential loss of property values. 3. Additional traffic in our neighborhood . s NAME AQDRESS �. /anL �Y T 4 -am Y� rj ?a RLA-9- fp,C j 7 y //JjCJ\JJA, V • 4 - - C k of ww�r ti r . . 1 July, lg86 ,I Dear City Council Member: This letter is a request that you help protect the rights of the citizens of Huntington Beach in keeping businesses out of our R--1 Zoned neighborhoods . A case which is currently under consideration by the council (CUP 86-25 ) , is asking you to allow a daycare facility housing up to 12 children in our neighborhood. � I feel that such a facility in a neighborhood which is composed of single family dwellings and is designed to provide peace and - quiet to its residents is just a violation of my privacy rights . The City Planning Commission reviewed this case and denied it based upon the detrimental effect on property values , unacceptable noise levels, and because the neighborhood Was opposed. This sane request was denied by the Planning Commission and the City Council last year . There 13 no real difference between the license request last year and that which is being considered this year . Your staff has recommended approval based upon compliance with legal requirements , however, those requirements Flo not reflect the vish-as of Mrs . Leonard ' s neighbors , the loss of home j values , nor the effect of increased traffic and noise . I , a voting citizen in Huntington Beach , request that you think of this as your neighborhood And cor:sider the effeCL on your house- hold. Please deny' Conditional Use Permit 36-25 and protect the integrity of my neighborhood. i Sincerely, i A ;i r • r - ^'R=^"u u.:ifs-tc,.,.. ., t r4.i;1-f :�..�*tf,'1`Rt� 'fr. •<< c'• ,i• . ',]::Y':•..rrGP'Yt; - ' - <,_ ,,,.;.....ti: ' ,t`q.. a On the attached petition in opposition (�-,�,�_j� ju:�..�-� ���►-r 1 7-2/--r O there are 12 valid signatures of which:�'�"`(,�� ,� L tv C ? 'of . these homes, both husband and wife work . . Traffic Noise R/k ` 2 of these homes are located between a grade school and the applicant . . . . . . . . . . , r Traffic c Noise NIA 1 'of these homes have allowed their children ( since they were toddlers, to date) to play unsupervised in our uublic street Traffic Noise ' N/A Supervision & Street Safety is Keep in mind the residence on Taurus In who may be hone during day time hours are subject to traffic and noise generated by Ocean View High School and Wintersberg School . lly day care children, infants through 4 years , can hardly generate any competition to this condition. fft ff How many valid si6matures are left on the attached petition? i • i `,• r • • - : i - nuniiRuiUn DiaCH DDELONMENT. SER9 ICES CITIZENS PET'ITICN TO THE CITY OF HU,1T11`,-IGT0N BEAM 1 t%;�'a JUKE 1996 P.Q. sox 190 Huntiniton Beach, CA'91b{4d ` We the neighbors of Barbara Leonard sign this petition requesting that she be denied 1 i cense to expand her day care center to 12 children .' The location of her place of business at 17242 Argo Circle is in the centftr, of .a ' residential neighborhood which is zoned R--1 and designed for single fam11y: resIdencee. The specific concerns which we obJect to are : j 1 . �1oi se from the children which is disruptive to our households, 2. Additional traffic in a cul de sac with 1 imi ted parking space . S. Potential loss of property values . NAME ADDRESS ';7 1.��7► c0^�' '�IGRX , MUSE TRAFFIC N/A A I2 .All ::OS�' NOISr 1 �'RAx=7C N/A el AM- 'J ,� � Z�, i , / � / J, � _ :..� �::�,�:.: •t 1 fir ��.► .ia� � ..1f. ►�iGi...�1{Q�S.-JC. lii 3 " DIus ! t,.'/A ARE ivC T;r �OrT. ARE' 11'0T Zip 300H . RADIUS t-1 s G.Z, cz:��ro "zo Dc. A�z. 1026 is 1C 4 IR FER ADDR:.SS - D M.,. , ..;1 ♦�IT10 ( lid FAI C. CF AND GFF �a .l • 'J .J L'r 1 •J c r ���';: ;�CRi; , tiCIS� �rRA�riC ic-71 a C: s z 7.7 CITIZENS PETITION TO ,THS CITY OF HLkgTINGTON BEACH JUNE 1996 We , the neighbors of Barbara Leonard sign th i s ,pe t i t i on request i ng that the be dert l ed license to expand her day care center to 12- chi l drect . . . The location of her place of 'business at 17242 Argo Ci rc l d Is i n the center of a, residential neighborhood which is zoned R--i and designed:.. for single :falmilY 'residences. The specific concerns which we object to are : 1 Noise from the children which is disruptive to our households. 2. Additional traffic in a cul de sac with limited parVing spa« . 3. Potential loss of property values. NAME ?. PLAYGROUND HEIR YOUNG ICH3LDREN USE THE ST EET FOR A PL GROUND , THEY ALSO CMATE MORE NOISE THAN . 01Y DA17 CARE CKILDREN . VOISE & TRAFFIC N/A 17JLi SUPERVISION & TRAFFIC 7r8- / S . 0 . BOTH 14OR`n, 1pt, r.sms-r NOISE & TRAFFIC P1/A OIJ E J•1GT;A`Z'L' ;: F' R ADDRESS PLEASE `1 �- ^1 . LOCATED B 7i1EE,; GRADE SCHOOL & APPLICANT /•�e.++s,e �. `(?'-7' T;"+.. /77 3 l �., �iY] br - TRis"r IC .r JiOT ,' �• Ii f A C+ir::. r R ADDRES i PLEASE �• v/� �j� - .CCA.':.D 3f ;/LED'' -R 03�S H00 , GAF �:-IC�.�i 1 y f - .rc. 7 n V f El O Z Tj A ' u/A ,•�f�t;> ONE SI •t''4TURE PEOR ADDRESS r:.EASE RrNy.�..IM' r.f. Z..w.-+r• —.. _ ,. _ r . ..r .,l►w4rN' __ �.•r h ..�1T r�MAY• ^11' .f )'.r+ r'a ;i..w{ - +w� .� 1 r { �,, ;t i ' a " The City of Huntington Beach ( City) requires 'me as the applicant of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) , fora large family day care home (LFDCH) , to furnish , at my expense the required varience report (maps & address � . -fables) so the City can mail the Notice of Public Hearing to all property owners within a 300 ft. radius of the exterior boundaries of my home . Since the City requires the public notices be sent to all property owners within the 300 ft. radius, it would seem that all those property owner' s voices should be heard as it is their neighborhood equally. It is their right as a property owner, to say to the City that a (LFDCH) will not create a loss in property values, excessive traffic or noise , 1•t seems unlikely that the City would require the applicant; to bear the added expense in having the varience report to cover the 300 ft. radius if the City dosen' t hear their voices as being a pro:erty owner in the neighborhood, 1. , 1 , - - - 1 gg I rye 'g PP e. Per i fra`m ="r Le a d s be issued, a .Conditional Us cn t nei hbors are Not In o osition and feel ,�arbaf a the City ofU Hui ntington Bba.ch to do child day care ,in ' her home. 4 I `forsee no traffi'6. roblems as ttie arents are ' i' t" . - u in their, 'drPvin and Ut is +rare., to see ,more '= cautio s .. than one car in -front of bier.:fhours'e at a ;time. They are here a very brief time then gone . Lj 2, ' • r - r p"Y V. e /� Z L -14 - see bP1o,�• �► = tee... Z G� VIC 'Gtic iS x6 Y7 •,'ice •�,•� ,,.�.�i.'�.-� ♦���'s��„i.K?"•,.T• �..�,� �,,,�, ; - f ell t • .ice ' ' r J 417 r ' 11j I'vi L.`-•SG...�....:!• (� r' (.{ `� j .t.►-C.Cta.tt;. �r'� . t. (` �� 4,� Z'�a �f. ...::nt r��r7'i,jn, r-ro- r � r h2ps�r 4o , the, f'►�c��or,.. - - z 198E I/de `.neighbors are not in opposition and feed. Barbara Leonard should be issued a ContI 'ional Use, Fer,�it from the.,City of Huntington ,Beach to ..allots her to ::take in additional day care -children. orsee no is iorob1eins as the parents are ' very . cautious, in I f traff their driving and t is ,rare to sae more than one car in." front of her home at a time., They are here . a very brief time then gone Day, „Care Hotries do not decrease nroAer ty values nor do they cr� sate excessive noise . 10 g r..r ,1. 113 .01 ir .� i y � &Tn � ��� � t �•.' Z_Gy Ail r i ,i R Pi,J K DRYVE �; 0 P`•P c 5E�ti� - t •� .. . ::,. . . � ., ` �, � �. cams Z CIRCLE ,/�• ',30 So.�►c fir'. ''_� '7 �;. 3B �,�,t. .7.9 tc' ,:�` �,.� .ta34 ,,f 132 ti 0-1 qR Le S u irT , ) Z Z [L� yr s *2 t t Zr r f 302 ro QrY� ' 1! �• I iv, 34 4� , A M ~ h r '� ` �► ' TUCANA DR/VC• 03 !Ir 7,�f r ' ky ^ '.1r 1� .`J S9i�i�.� .a•. .'.!�• ;tj f) � J�f.... .Jr,>.. �t Q• Svl�r ro INI d y' �y y ',�.� �«•5, I �;: Sf' �U A ``1f`,.i•. h � ni'�r,•�� °. ,' 1, �ttl: 1 d ( y r• t. 'f `5 s ,; soh �' ,�• r: 4 DRIVE ICE n ,i• � r NO135 .'•fiS 'fir ter. � r,,. �1J IE ,• h ♦ fl �� „d Ir es f. On01 a W 0 J• r M01nRS�' O r3 4 Q� ............. by ;1r ar�d i�.rs. ;uxray 'and RE tter of :June -14, 1986 • _ Le 14r. and Mr-s. . r4cClintock 1. Noise e families have two children a' d these childr ,a: Each 'of thes en` `1 have friends b. Wlien all of those children are together,. unattended , they,�do, � create a,-much hi her . noise level than my day care children as some. of these Children are older," school age: 29 � Traffic 1 a . vo of these children have been playing in- our public street" ' unattended, since the were toddlers, other neighbors .as .well as myself have seen this happen on a regular basis. PIS b. A pubaic street is not a playground. There ' are yards to play in as well as several parks clone by. c. F. rents of the neighborhood children should be instructing their children on street safety and not give them the false security of a cul de sac . d . A new petition signed by our neighbors stating no traffic problem,. 3 Declining property value. a. This is speculation, not a proven fact . b . Lame Family Day Care Homes that are part' of the. neighborhood care just as much as do other residents about keeping the neighborhood attractive. c. often the day care home is the best kept home on the block because the woman who lives there is at home all day and tapes s` zcial' p pride in her homes ap ri pearance. d. Since most mothers work , day care is often seen 7by hoMetyuyer. s as an asset to a neighborhood. It may even raise property values. ; e , A Conditional Use Permit for a Large Family Day Care r'•ome is a 'conforming use in a residential Lone. 4. � 'Small ' home . a. Staff report shows : 1. Outdoor play area Required : 9.00 sq. ft. Provided : 1040 sq . f t. 2. Indoor play area Required : 420 sq . ft. Provided : 890 sq . f t e b. Staff has made a on-sight inspection of my home . Rebuttal by : Barbara Leonard I li JIM i. HUN�'1NGi0N;��CH 'OEYEt�I�MENT�SE CES r Dear`Planning 'Cotsaaissionsr: P.0"9,,.,. _. • _ Nur�tin�ton'�asc 4 We ati s i s i a 1 2Cice ea Le oppose, r n n Cond tbnal- U e Perm t t 77. Argo , r 1 b e a pP 8 8 -of nbise. ,,traffic and declining property value. The oise factor ins ,disruptive xith'rthe K existing six children .and the „ love noi.se4 Is the same whether they are in the enclosed patio playroom or in the backyard. usuall little"or no. rsf£ic� on a. cn a cul de sac .was •becau'se there is " • , <'y homes cul de :sac.. However, if a":permit is he ma n reason we purcha e 6 Wore cars coming down. our street tKice a 'day , tale of tuent - ranted, there would.'be fora to y four car trips daily generated from this one residence alone. we ar o' concerned that g Y ' Y nder , a lat e .£amil da care facilit would',h� our ropertiy .value We would,'_not have purchased cur homes eight and fifteen years a ere been a large •day care facility` in- operation at that time, -4 Sde fee :r st ,,self xo�•a ,large family --day''care center. The', omes•�re �na es eciai'l a• reF tr,does not:,lend i ' p y single ' level' 'such ,•as the one..in ! question.; k .a,large business, of; any-kind is inappropriate -in`a low`density residential area such as this. ulsi very much Pike to keep our street of single .family homes strictly . residential. Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. Jeff Murray Mr. cClintock ` • M. and Mrs. Ray r rC - . '••� a fs�,it R nese pic,u_es _ ._ • - •, . - .: 2�'•'?�'• �' �` '. .-�-- o� _ ... w . snow r,;o . ;e r-iico r - =` , --• ►= till children , the one 0 he r`..e _s ? ,`•'Z"S . �jT(ZEE'••' tr 4� nnd one on tl b i k o' d . �J �o-h .hese children have teen allowed to - ,• 'd Brie S le •/• �.f _ A he-; wer.-, toddle_ .. . Du q zare-,zal t' *':' t•,i�; 1.._ _, ..tee , 1=lai,s,•. -� :'2e: _ t -,!',e5 ,� • : �e=•t's•:;'ti::it.t.l:�,:�• ;� parer S are ar_'ul ,�;;:� j.r•;�'.-' .t' ,� are r r car J and v►�" � � •��Y ��'f�W t�.t«���r�r .•^��••�..� *uy�{, y M is ��+ ,,j.. r:• t • ., w.*irounds .are - '" z„ ` . :�� • :- ' � ' �: :^� .." , -- ;;,~;;•.fir-"�;+�y����; -rF.•�"'"r�,�t�y �„ +.. . t) j'aS�J"�'1;:�'� `►g� `y,�: „y t.� :..r ; ;���;:`�.3�j'==,,y�`-:;'.�''"�•,�;�t'1 �i�� "t �,.�. t� ',q._� .t^-'• , �v'�-�'�`��f�+,gjs'�d..r�;�,.Y titer,:. ✓'t.,'�Y�,-...�,.r ,�11�?1 :�: V,w,t ••• .a•.� .('.►, ate•~ `y!P• ./ .:�M_A'�� t••tt�i,♦.� ."...- •+r,�w:' .� •1••.t_.✓�►'1. j.�r �,Y.�.1�ti _ilJ, i f .�y,.ij��. )ti:r•��«I .rlr-yl, •LLr.•-t.4 J fAI a, ../� GI✓�•'•�•1•;"'+~1. •' .� ' wil=•Z� .�.y�-•��.�i}~� ��.��7R��9� mow. ,y�.p��.��.�:{�,„! 1��1�r��.:r•".. f •`- 'V0, yr,$3► .ti.�•� • ' ./•. "y7�"Lyafr:`i-•..�►�"/'y���'�Vy���[n.*.�` �''r�„' ,t •.'�•_~...t,f•.;••I,.w..',y•7•y' L,`r'�,�y�;2.���,�•,• ` �Mi�ItY�ii`� Ar. .• + '~~ •. •� 7• r.••._ �- • '-� •M �rrR�I,T . , 1 --r'T .`� —- •-'.- �:"'+ � •-„'tom= ' �� .�%.♦• :�alC� r,%L �1~•'=��r�SS��•"r•�r.,r��•e ��n11 tr��� rt j' L•.•i �_.. wt�LII�•h •w r�;1�,j,•!Tr.-.;.��J•t- •.r..l.-�� ��'7-7iii'•••••�aaa'''```����.���nrF;,.�,.. .L"'._•. r, ,�• .a• •�' f' wl'h151 a ro :;'S � ',1 •+;;•�`_! 1''r '�f : 1'♦/0."'",�� CR.r w�{�YYi..4�. r ' '•'~• .... �'-• ^:.,. ��I'+''�'•1�' y' ..•j Zr„'7=yam !!.r.Ij •�YI• • � p,ZV w ,r�•`r'�t;T•?2�•r-.1_ 1��•iN !.•:;'rwl,�"I•r•+Yf• '�"�}; .�ti� ,..• •�y ��{..��„t•y� s' � ,•,• JGT P •rry -� '.1. •f:t'j`.•7t;C�«yTJ r,�v►M to�.,,t ' p•^'� 141f1 `.4 .��i + �"•4�� �C J� f`».` k•/'�zyl l♦,�_>t c'�� � i �,/.,l' � .1►;,,Fad:jc•�'►-1�,•ct �./♦ +w. ,r,'y '.,.�, • '.3,'t sue.t:•/•�'^' ••�_.,J H �(..•`T•' •} Rs ML gr �• t`" .-,•.:.ram�!►` ;�kc:.i,t+r;ltti7�l"�j{ _ r• � A-lt 1•' ��Y �.l,a '•� IWK PA wl.} �> a .. •P7 _ .♦Y._..I !�•f• w( •�� Ir..r�,��v� /1 � tt•` .�.il�hh`,!h'�•` 1`S� v�t• fJ.. •^ea• WA s ��iv4+f_ •t�r+�•�•.tr �••y, •'Gi'.;r♦"+: i II .�. . + ♦�t !� l-!�F�,�' �1.�•r iY.'� ►;j`h�' � f OWN �� ;= ,�` a,•� � .( 1.,� ��x/.;C'"' Hsi-^. i�. ,.r:�ti•��,►•.0 :t• J- , .. r: •,, 1•G .1 :rS, �.uf• �•1 ry�YU�l9 arr r*~1v • l.,/ f_' ••♦�!1•.tjL•1..,.,1a ► ry ` {w•t,�,V[.�� w•'i'f l;tt Z,.h�•'`^r 4rC 1 •- f.�w .{f Y;J E O W ...•�t-•j --. 09�R• �t r 11 '•1 `'.f"'�,1y�~�`�\~f,1p 'i'"K.�f;~ir � i ♦ I � r.V ���•t ,'!�`",'• a A'�'.j��? �i.�ifi��.li•�!�;�r����.�1,��,.,y+t� rL,l� � .�►� ,� IS♦ t � � �d '� 1r 1 11 f , � 1 i�r 1•a�j` . .,f•"1'_f1 f.J' ♦ r�5•t�r,�� � { (• •. ri[ `� ` • y •Ir:9 y` '''t tll�y -1,.rti� !`�' L�� a �t � L�•.. -�X M•a��l y+l`a y��� �' `�: • { '�•.?/ !,il•jJ 1 �=.y11{1 , J .v�� '�i`.•S.•, i. y1,R.o•••'-•t Y► 1 �p<�i?_�M�:�a/ 1 ��1iµ�'ef� . ti. ' �.��• `1 f•{ir } 1..a ♦ '' _•r r ` ' . r -�ii!w„' R fps �� •' •I• ,M 1 +1•!ry ..•.I •. .. \l�� y����•.,,�;-.'w3.�+/.rrJ1Y'—^.'v.•�Q� fl�� .] , • '� 1..►j a.r•+H► V '..F.��Twl'•' 'f is...t zwc Jv- -~�� � ' •��ItK.t a 'r w�•i. tr= '�j�� L�r�•��•is' �•�aa!`�� :.� iM�,. - ! �••-'�S •••r.••_ :1• .�/•�, •�1� ttr%+�'�1 !• y7„• Myer �� i. l.,f. ''~� .Yi�•Jr' �-;; r, a- ...! •,•.-,.�?_G.�� �`i i✓L;' Wit• ,�C� * t+ • r e«t•'•`r����r F';Jrtr' t,�Ir�%'�+ ��;.7 w•:.��'�� W.' _ram r N ,•'r ~. ��' '!{��e� tc . � _• ,�i MIA •Aa+w-i-.7:-.� •ia ��'!'••• -:FLr.,r�,R.fa'�:''!'r' .�.:w i�rt��.-i1�:..•VyLj!Z ile ,yam ..�»'r:YM•1� .���i i`l.A� '►ira�.�A "La r ��,y}'�-rat ...:_ _..—.�•L+� Y r j :•ram"= �. -•,�:jr '' •'r "�y• . .s `.•\ .+t'• w...•t'r,.r•1�1.rj' //~.. �1� V � +�•�'•�.�/��SJl;^�`'' A'�ws ,- ' ' • ! t..i' ! •.,•'�I:•..e.l+! -•w,�•r�a�^�r��C,s,(,�a L;•+�'t�tr• r' •-i?S�",,'yJ,. r ,,• .` r .•��•r! ••i•Al��' �.Cr►•.f••C'=�1.d,}f�r+...�.'}y7_ T,�71iM+I��t.•ti*•">-f�>u•��.,V`" ' r .,,'".- ♦ .. •J :iA•Y�.. .ram•' +...y�[ t,lr, 'Nt. ! �..,1 ..... l �i:.• �lr,i �11•� ,����R:f£ti�� •J.r [ 1^,7����Z/ `fl • :l,l .r., ..•. .. t.r. •• ..�w((Z�., ii�'f •�-! �• ram.• • r �+:r.••"•'r .��,75�•� . t�J�f,''.'�.'C Y,}r��.i� Jr 1'� �^t�\. 'y.�IS•.. s ".'••ram~ • ' 1 l.,b•d- ..•}:i r.1• 1 ,.�{�lr���,,�}}.� r yr.�',.• r:�.�S.t'��•` L;l��r 1 ;� 1�,.r • . '���-spy f.,t.,���Ylr i.�/ ly�rP.� � �r,. �'-� r.••_ • •.i-•-��',: . • - t . .. J:f«...� �.) J ,t r)r,..l._, 'fir••':_�;•-��,��. ! ' �t its•• .y... � . r••�12'1�� J�.�.+j5l cvttl��y•>�iW;,�If� �J it, �*,.+�.7>l ,h 'I:t<d�• I ��N':�! `LJ}C> �'�rit�1..�1��'i�'�r,µ�' �'a� ,i het',�4`��. ��h,,•'':, 1 i�;�C ♦L:i tw!`41'r� ,n��41� ��.Y�')' �}�i� �3 �t 1 r�,i: ! �r ,` ��4" �'.f ��i.i< ����rrjf' rYt •1lrZv /f i �, •:� 1 � •t •1' ''7 ; j�v�♦�• c�'r:1:aL �r.."rr Rl.q�''t...r�S� ��� �II /} 'ti �)�y�'�..n.+ �.•V' + SX'�,'i•f�1^�,Zc.;�1.���=if�i.i 4-`r. . .. ... ,�}y . • /H..��! •• I t� i• �,. �1- ���t�� •i�� �� r� 171��•1) �. � . ,f•'{ t, 'A ..•, 1��t'�'�. +'S'yT.IF T[�•i�,� ! r ti "', YY,..l� •.��ri.'f ply••.�. !\/.}l, `.4••. t�.t'y-.r,~t 'Vw^ � Ar1t.'O.il ^� 1. .. w It '�� ��. .• + y..•,'t�+� �. l,' ,,,alr:.♦r 'x..ls4: '�M; !_ ti .. !r,�•'r:r �• . . . :' ��:! •. }a..r.j� �i ` j1`„�r"��•%F' _ 1 r�r-n �'Yr' '��;F•�1��� r'1�` '�+'Y`� � _. .. _. '�•:�! 1•�`y.tt�t r �:1� �:�1 .�vy� �`r+`,''' �� � . ry�r � •l.r.+y �.TK'7 *�f,3i •' y�t.'1••�,11 R�y!'`� �7�Y.Lt117('•!•i�l.+ i• .�k� �• �ti'`, ! ri-•. r ` ♦. >~ ' �yt i n -RE : Bowyer letter 'of June �.�5, 1086 1 . Three home . h sfnes's t not aware ,of - the other two bu�si'nesses and I'm home all 'day, , every week - day.' be. if there are two others, are they licensed through the.tity ) If so , then it seems as though I'm being discriminated against . 2. a. My day care children are: infants through f 0 U r years of age . J. bo i►Iy day care chil'dren create less noise than unattended neighborhood'; children. c . My day care children s activities are scheduled and co n'oritrolled r. so they S g nat create problems for neighbors. ... is �P 3• Repeated protests from the neighbors .. a. I' ve had no protests from any neighbors except those -'of at Firs . Brusewitz, who claims she hears "childrens voices" . -A safe play environment for our children. A SA'f A��n a. I've watched neighborhood children from to size la in p y' n g" ��Al ddler- �.insuervised in our public street. 'This is canGidered riet r. on the part of their parents. b. A vublic street is not a pla ground. There are yards toy pla,. .'in as well as several parks close by.. C . Farents of the neighborhood children sho nstruct their children on street safety and `not give them the false se%�urity of a. `cul .•'de sac. Airs . Leonard submitted etitrying , t. - ���� 5 p Lions from last year, and is tr• in •�o t vresent them as news a• This (attached) petition was submitted for evaluation. m p r twenty--' times,. b. he petition tion is clearly dated I+:arch 1985 , chE� c . Where was no intent to represent it -as a new petition, 6. 1,oth '' S old outside Jobs , the are not home all th � ...Z � ,�,rs Bowyer h y e time , every week-day. It seems odd that they are,'having a daily problem copping with our street in general . A new petition signed by our neighbors stating no traffic problem. Rebuttal by : Parbara heonarC3 w" 4t' NUNt Gt BEACH` -. DEVELOP MEKt SERYICES " V 6..15,86 JUNL1 r! M 4tr. an hire. Jack Bowyer 17221 Argo,, Circle' Dear Y CX 9.'264 7P.0 ' Box 190 Huntingn 8esc Nucitin` ton.6eact�, GA` idR are rrri tin this letter,in`o' oiti.on'to; a etitio Barbara' Leonard � Kho residea atPP P. . by Hrs.n filed. & 2k2 A=go CYrcla, 'to open a day care 1T center to 12 children. , . r .,, ••.;jam .� •., _ . ... ,,. / ,! .. w ',• 'y. 4 J..' .• ..� a. . .. . . We object to this.petition •ore the "grounds that ea:f sting' conditions in the, neighborhood ,are such that adding additional ,day,care childrens, ,xhethe' r it be in tuo shifts or., a, one day s?iift basis, would cause intolerable stress to an already overstressed 'situation. 77- At present We have' %6wi•fiusinexsea:4operati�r�� an' our.,.street, one of which!bel-n` sto Mrs. eonar or re '.at ,another address and brf.ng,;a to_110 additionax,vehicles, to our street each`'day as. well as several trips,.tiy_''UPS deliv�srr.trucks and occasionally a 'semi�truck,'and trailer. In addition to this 'traffic rye have the usual =asident traffic ! G and Mrs. Leonard's 'day care: traffic. There are only 13 homes on our street with approximately 28 resident armed vehicles. There and 19 ''small children artd teenagers living here, not includin t S 8 ng the ; r day care children. We are also blessed •with a practicing rock and roll' band and :12`10 of the .usual dogs and cats that populate a neighborhood, all adding to he noise and confusion. We areno t` doubting that Mrs. Leonard's heart is in the right place-as `1 she assur e:d us last year she was not doing this for the money. but .rather her love of, children. We do feel, howevers that she has ,ignored repeated��protes s from the neighbors to increase the number of, children in er ome, asking to extend ourselves even further by allowing more traffic through the cul de sac each day. W�hon we purchased."our.home 15; vears 'ado, we paid more money for the advantage of jiving on a _quiet cul de sac. We now feel that with increased traf�is .' from these businesses' and an increase in Mrs.,` ieonard's business that our r-y values are in jeopardy, our peace and quiet is threatened and I aafe piay environment for our children is lost. ate ,also feet/ that it As an insult and a burden to' have to ursue this battl e each 'veer with new letters and more tri s to the Council Meetings. We have no, intention of ,changing our stand an this issue and would like to see the' reriod of time for' reoetitionina on the' part of Mrs . Leonard 'ex ten ding to 1 several zears rather each year as it .is now. The constant letter writing, .� threats and petitions on the part of Mrs, Leonard are annoying4 r-t has also come to our at n.-.,in that Mrs. Leonard has submitted to the \/Coup-il petitions that are copies from .last vea and is trying po•'-peesent them .as ne�».potions. Many o the peop a who signed her, petition `last year no longer live in this neighborhood. Sincerely, ; Mr, and ,Mrs. Jack Bowyer IESITION 1, FAVOR OFAPaARA I...ONAR D' S CHILD DAY' CA IE THM gn g . d parent's of children who a►re 'ale:'; the undersi ed; as: nei hboi s'_ an �.n na' Care Hocae', do su or.t Ba - pp rbara Leonar d `; of of a licensed lee C _ ar ca . toddlers an' d irifa.nts We ` sk ttee appropriate legislative body o"f the Ci t Counsel to approve; . " yher Conditional• Use Permit. 1` !r. - 3, 7 z 3 zAPF,�VO cl e C2 9'• 5. Ale 10 PkAz- i � �- S � •� . Leg.- ' ( w. r 20 , 2:.. - 2., - M , • • 1 Reg ' n letter dated jurie ls; l9'86 t allov l y No, �in, +c` -,di�ti .t,•' ,, • `,�. ., :.e y. . . :, f rr • g : on onal use '"permits-nighborho od diseas e •: erhotossubmitted zoed � Arre he Cen e the `in-'-the , the C33Ty of. Huntington beach? Exactly where are , they. located? ,. 2. Pride­i)n our home;`. Lar e y Y P! gh g d a . . 'family --day da re art of the nei' borhao care Jo es a just as care 3 much as ,do other residen:s 'about •keeping the neigh=barhood attractive . , 3 Zoning and deteriation '.of property values.• a, Conditional Use Permits 'x''r a large family day ezre `home -a conforming use in a , residential none: b PP Loss of ro erty values is pure speculation, not a proven fact. c Often day care provided M e neignboirhood is, seen ' by `homebuyers as an asset to a neighborhood, as most mothers'`work outside "thE. hon4• are cen tern includ ; 4. Photo aphs ' of day c irig 'the existing: one in'our • ' nei ,hborhood . e b i .r ed x' for i h h` a The ho to s submitted, � Ge� t o the on in our ine o ood�• P � P g , are just that, cep. They ars n Large FahAly Day Care F0.1. es in our city. Although many people don 't realize It, child care p:, brams come in ttiyo fa rms- -fanily da care homes and child care 'centers. When peonle hear the term'' child care , -,: `. most often they immediately think of a l3x;P `center, b . _ are �o n' ted in Centers are usually ZC .or more children and buildings designed as child care institutions. Family day care `! homes are legally required to be located in homes where the provider lives. 'INve?ve is the raximum capacity .for family day care homes. c. The photo of the .day care home in our ' ne;ghborhood shoal the addition has been dons: by a professional. I6 is mice loo'-:1.ng, which will increase prope..-ty values in the neighborhood`. �t .0 tition { o be sl;.bmi ttqd ) sip-,ned by ngirhborin esidents fgh. a es 'no doss irs croverty values" Rebuttal oy xSI 101 , die.; i f A.r Imo..«►4 - �ar�ara LAo;�ar�i r y �llt•. ; ,._(M;' L. ..:.r ....Wes. its\1w.- , . ...,'t 1J'Y_,Cn':. "- .. .. ...)1•1 1 —__�.�__...�__..._ �_) _-_- .. �_ _•___. _- (,•t A , HUNTiNG�ON SEACH 0f1►GLAPMEtiT SE lVlCES Jurie 15 , .1986 ,iUN 1 6 13 it • Po: jox' 1��J Huittit� fin �e1c 't►� 5Z�4i 'Plannifij,!!Commis'sion Huntington';: Bea-chCivic Center `2004 Main, Street Huntington Beach Caiifcirnia Subject : ; Conditional ,_U e."T rmit•'No,. 86-25� Commis S i on Members . 1 Conditional`+use `permit's ' do .break down the 1,_integrity;, of single family residential ' ne f,"ghborhoods . One : conditional jtiuse pern, t ion for a second or, thlr .,.con;diti . 1. use I is used, -as . justificat' • ona ,y 1}. , permit and ' has been used for this pu'rpose,,in . this case ' Several conditional use permits are used as. ;justifiCation, for ;;variance's -, and bc.�th are used as;, justification for , s of zoning changes . bfy, p t the best w_ ay. to main twin 't• a integrity of the oxnt i.s tha ' • 1, , , .. 8� � Y; g , ..,<,.+ :.-' .., , , „any .a szn le ',famxl residential � nei hb'orhocd, in ....h.xs community or '. . :Other.. community is by not allok•ing ccnditiola' , use permits ,in` en esablishe` i hborhoc+d. The system bt ; • ,'�s a . progressive eigh�orl'iood disease . 1. -e - ` This is " a good . neighborti"ood .in which the: ai•ners' :tal.�e pride 'xn their domes and are improving and up-grading them on a: continuin' basis . As a• home",, owner in this . communi.ty I : expect + , i4n et by the,, city ..to be up-hel-d and prevent the 4!e!t��ra oriin s , of pro ert� t►slues . ht,am enclosin some' 4t of ~hg dcy-care ts° " d � ,k including 1 he� no- one en � c ar - lhis "home has an addition with. a secondaryentry (mRed) _w} ich can be ea. s,,,.i-::'l,,y . . ., gave to `be done' kith city approval a1 but .course , .•legally, this �r:oul�d 4_• converted to ,a second livin unit . 0 y pp t with ext"eTxor , wor}. camonet(} (with,.permit) the interior could be chan ed without , y g Since,ely., a c s 1t. ea J g' i 1 725i Arso Circle Huntington Peach, California 92647 Aylttq►ittW to Pu4l�tarl AdvorliMreints M 00S Wnt��►Q1 Nb4st : nOfitfata by'bKrM o1 iha'Superior COutt o1 0fanqu COun{y. C811101nis. Number A-6214. Oa1fa0 29 So. lembsr, 1961 ' and +' A•2�iS t. doled t t «'ur%*.•1"3 __ STAi'E QF'CALIFaRNl�► � County of Orange POW aoW co"Wed ` '6 4p tnq Nna� w , w ,n t-rpw+1 ,� .rn 10 PKS Cow—**An% am a Cil zen`of the United States and a resident of the Count aforesaid• I am over the age of eighteen Y. years,. and-not a party to or interested in the below _ .• errllitled matter. I of the'Oran9e am a principal cleric Coast DAILY PILdT, with which 'is :combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Crange. Sta:e of California, and that a Notice of PUBLIC HEARING }� t of which copy attached hereto Is a true and complete T copy. was printed and published in the Costa Mesa. Newport Beach Huntington Beach.• � q h. Fountain Palley, - •. ; irvine,' the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach u f ONE TIME t3ea issues o said newspaper er for P P consecutive weeks to wit the Issue(s) of .'ci July 8 e`.ta> 1 � , •. , toe � •"' ' � ra,w=i • 19el di6cIire; under penalty of.perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. July 8 6 Ex uted on at C to Mesa, C iliornia. a 'Signature •,. 4 �t 1 . "00F• OIL KINI'iCATIO • f y t• rw 7 r ,t; iY f • -CITY' HUN.-. .1N0T8N F , t 2000 MAIN STREETCALIFORNIA9260 r OFFICE"OF THE CITY CLERIC • r f - . October 109 1986 Y r Barba rya"rL`en'nard :. 17242 Argo"Ci rc e t . Hu�tington`Beich! ,,CA .92647 ' The,.Ci t Council of the. Ci t• of Huh npp Eton' Beach at� j is re ular .,. Y y 9 9 . mee'cing field Monday, actob'er .6•, 1986, denied your 'appea, ' to„the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional' Use :Permit, NO. '6645. y Thus is'-a final .''decision:, You are tiereb notified :that pursuant 'to provisionls "of Section 1094;6 of .the .Code of.Civi1,,,Procedure, of• .the State of Ca14do n;ia you have nicety.'days from October 10, 1986 to R, apply to -the courts for ,�udi ci al revi eN. if, you' `have any�;questions regarding this matter, please contact our , office 536-�5227. Alicia'-h. Wentworth 1 City Clerk A,Nf i:'cb cc: City, attorney, Development Services Director .. .. --. .,t��ayi,tr ve. __. .. . .-. ,..•.v.+vula........1�LL 'L..j_.-.`h.-1 . _ ..,, .r. __Wr,,.t..i'�.a.V,..tln .1094. SPECIAL rtz"i cFF.l)lN(372 t aiifuruitl 1 u•tf lr�a) �lr hnu•. > I'n•..,,,t t• tnit,r,l'',ti.,,,u 1` ' �• r;''yt 1 'u�; +.s�y,t r.. ,t.uu+ rtl for tr w .,.i�„j.�. '�''•. L • ►f� • t �iIL�1 mr41 ltl,i. .�lli,rn{L.i Ni• utNt t{at hive 11•�►ir>►4yr' 10 1Il171i1 1�7 l'n!.'Rlt1T. G{It, fii t'.1.�Mt „1, l.furll it�i-. ' i, Trial cull tt'it j11,l91,11-111 4i0111C .rrit '14' :ift. 1pt t'.A..11i�► � { �t•!:: rn rfi� tnolulntr 'to �Mnnl+rl dirtvtor of n�ri.ltltttro trsrt .IIf4t kU/t. �y: �,;.;'r. ?'; �''1~�„ '-�•� ti� ,i, In Piet I,•t t•Irr{• .iti"aifl►�;y l{ i , 7�` ; , i I Woo nbipe 'up a 1tr�M1�'iti (,noolnt•re „t -'11►t11 alto'-New �Yill) .tl ,t'�1M► •1`�ry r��t,zt�'.'.�."'tt'r t•tt ti,r - nud,rnsl, rr pioiitts;:i.ul•li� rr.,.h6 t ,.il rl mnn i t i a;. 1'rtini:ll tw'- jwlr• in trim t*butt wdth . rr<•li�lor tlt untt!latin Mtwl %I 1 Kt ttt dirrrtur fur putl•It►r of d+itta, xl+rtrNR•iN:Irre r r, t r•y+tnaitlerit:x the t fu witty. tin t ioueh im• r it tl,,., n t+r:trltttrni.a«u n� ww. 1 •' ,etlliOtlrr t MOfi� of Ir,.11ucttil only' a to:'what , » ,wlerd ' �hrrt: It,vrstt foutr ; thn th•e citat�es nl:ainilt 'l were nni one of tll•;dntl•►;'tilid't+.q "%If* ter. flow. ritli=lotted' ,br„ eXGirttrt. 11'�uRfirGl t.: LritH itntrt td ttlq,r,i) ntt;nl.�..r1 lii.r .�: Direvior of Aericulntre Ulli' 1" lllu l.fsl. iurat aIm3",itiz;rruior.'lytli.► ritrl:�rte.J ltlirr. 010,29( .A311 2CO. meptl<itr; attrr .r�.en�ne`r1.e J r+rt .t �- flit %ul►erior qLrurt,`,tiV-.t*m31•t tl,i:tiae„r 1 rotrediuc for romew of ,{rui11 1+,t Ire►• to ;�tlie. ty•Ituili■*!pu fog t.•.aa�hi.rat:r� mlKaloner- of rot"Iforntlot►a of lie rw.lt to ltritiKa •robot; rieiq• of, I,I,url•I,ill,irrik . •�,. w1,Mr;tbl•tt wtttl a'NintSl,tr;tr tlr he•r would Lr rrtnnnllrlt to;/cnitrrint, marl'for t f�tluttt gtrM.'�,!•rratt{Ver hlJ,wf. l"rye R r'l;�'g. sM. tlrtcrntittntinu �i,etbcr iltrh. +�tta I,uUrltu�• ty C161 :+•rtit•� t'oturn{rauu f1tIC►21 w tial evidence to �upiturt I ,uuitlraiutlet tl 1'•' 3.1011%VA 21i 114. fiudinga. where court improl+erly deter• u to>ls ►ean;1094.6. , is g , film ,; time, rt.card, dt:ctsiotx and itltrt�� r3efiiatrd; ar- dinrtnfle or re,01tition (a) Judicial review of any decision of a local agcnev. other than „ school district, as`the'term local agency,Is,iie-firie(VAn Srhlon 54951'of the Govern Code, nr of and commhgs `Axton; ki 'tid afr�' ict.r or:agent t en tit, •-co'f,s piny be had pursuant to Sectfan 1094.5 of this ode onh-,.if. the petition for µnit of mandate,,put�sutlnt Iwsuch sLviion; Is filed %Vithin the time limits specified in`this section. y , rE ti (b) Ally such petition shall be ,tiled nut'.]ater than the 90th day following the date on which the derision becorne5'fit al' If`there is no to g provision for reconsideration of the derision in My appl:rable prof►i Sion of any statute, charter. or rule, for,the,'purposes of' thi~secttan, r' 1.the• decisIL r. is final on the date it is`'madc.'. If,there'is surli prop isIon [or reconsideration;'the decision is final fear:the'purposc�a of this sec- tion upon the expiration of the period during %vhIch such rrconsidera- tinn can be. sought; provided, that,if t ec•taiasldei�ation'Is sough purse- itllt to any such pro�'ision'the`decision is final`far`the purposes'of this .ecttan an the date that reconsideration is rejected. (c•1 The t•nttiilleti• i•Ir•tt1TI�Gr f lie-ltrt)f.cvdln sit-III Ix. I11 epared by 1t{Ir ItK;il -Igolu-N. .t►tr its 1,11111111Is•.itin, IH►aIYI,'c�fftt'iii, Ott ais;t•ttit' '«�tii sty " bide the dt'c'lsioivand shilll li doli,verrll to llie` petit,ionel w"Miln:tit) <` d.lys'irflrr he ling fitctt .t �ritteia icrluest liit.r�fur. Thi."lcx•tll ngenry �t.. may recover'frorn the petitioner Its actual costs foe• tfh6,gcribing or atherwise preparing the record. Skh lrecord'shall'Intai de'llie tion-, •rl ftt of the pror�edin fell le. ,..nry� 111 :,ot - _� c._, p di 17••�I Ice sand riders, ia,ny proposcrd decision by n hrarIng offlt*r, the filial decision, all tsd lifted 674 ' • � , ' ,� ,' '� / r � it '- ' V1, l Y r 1 Y A tYV•) tlwt ip Title i, „ ,N'RIT'�-OF' li�N1)ATE tl § .109 f:`•fI 1: t - �.,.f '` c.. ,f rtJ.r tr r , r. ���r � �•� f ! .;. , z� �.� , I S, exhlblts, all-i•ejecfcd exhiblta;in the:064essicn-of•'the.lolcal agency,or its:cammlc�ian, boa'rd,'officer agent; all written'evi Bence. an any other '._} r i firs in tr•;�Y.:r •fr�vV ' +,"� ltil Af tii.► petitioner filrs'ua•�{utwl :far•ihi► record ak'sjiORicci In -�,. 1 •V� 'q'•1.1• ,t Neill►+{ivisitm tc�1 v<illiin 1n tl•tv`'aMsi'� "4tr tt�tl�,;lhc ckcis�inn''►�ecom� ti- t , '. ,,..�.•.[ ,..1 't J! '~4`�'-•�. �,'!il•tv,. .,..� ,. nsl as-pi•o��tdt.iI In uhttiviwluli (L►) -{�iu ilnt ;v�jthin'wlllch st;jK►iltictii .:,5l R. .- r�. � .-� •t.' „lSS• 1:.�\. •Y. .21,.:..fir.. Nils nt�to � •�ion]0: 1 5 muyr{> filed'Wii1`;he extended,to not WW ii, 4; ( a ;: t ,:.✓ l f than the�:30tti Iduy following the dute on which the rscvrd ib ulther personally dellvered r'matled't' the.petftioher'or hls� attorney o,i rec- + F' ord, if he has,'otle+ ( ; • • ,'m ans n'thise As`u oatory admann, d isian istrative:derYsSan m�i<di►, aftex hearing;`s`uspending,`demoting 'ordts- missing.'ari!off Ic it or.."employee, revoking or:denying �an'application for s'permit or a>license r or.den in un a placation• for any retire- nient belief it or allowance making;a final dcic Sian'as, fined"in subdivision (e),1 the local agerscy.shall.p.ovide not.ce:to the party that the 41'me`within l , which judicial review must be sb tgli is governed by this section. As hard in this:subd vision; party mean 'an officer on ern- �t I s plo-vee •%,no,hus 'been suspend"d, desriiated or dismissed; a person I� «•hose,permlt or,license'has been revoked or.•whuse,appllration fcr a ` , ., ' wrmit'or licenS+c kris,been `den{eid•"`or a' 1 perso w appll n hosQ I catTan for' : a retirement'benefit'or,allat��ance h'as been"denied. : t*; r+ 5 (g) This sectionshAllrbe applilable in a'local agency anly.if the fi g. p• , g sects ni a llt:able. Ii such ord fiances.or resolution is;adopted th .w u nn in . Provisions' of this st=ctian,shall ivvai1 ovt*'r s�n�� conillcttiig pn vision in"aby of hen�t�I:;e i>ppllrizble law°relining to'the�subj�ct matter. . t Added 1-y Stats.1976. c. 276, p. 581, § 1.) f' Form tyre Wroit•M Crliforuia Code Norma Civil Prime lure. Library ltetermces .%tlniliifrtrntht• i.nn• Simi -1'rnivilurr C,1..4. Publir A•dtulttl*int:ire Iludiee a1111, ' C=T=. Pt► r•+larc lli i Notes of Decialons thar ►�;' Exhauitloot of administrative remedltt 7 luult r��1•n+irl,ntjurirliil�tlohII rrtui,kl teriline }ft, Whether tilt• it111 Sir IIractit•r 01nrgOi lot,tre Jntelti.a, at71. lr1 ,iirK uF.:t��chrtr' failure to +•ttl�unxt their nlltltlttl11i rill hr,rt•11ictlie>~ 1. In ventral unilrr illr'1th•l.ln A/•i.;trllll cnurt arrest In : •q.•h�nd INsaril's .ttniiairral frrrAiii; W s•r111111tig writ W. uwtldlltr to romi►rl rinpet• 1�';u•lU•r..• N;Itttrlr•� Itft••r tr••011101tc Of i10%, i111C1111r•111 ,lit, tlnd •utherN.tto ruler wr`hr.•�1 �'rltf. Mltllr .•rllrrlr.•1 Ilrj,ntitllinll• Nlliatl••►' llf (•Crltlilt l►•na�IM't�. /llnplldr �'lll•' ., ` t�'Ct• t'r11rlttt�. nriH airIv wiii, Silt unfair im �•v:uuhry 1•alr•n1/1r•'Apo a t. �o��Ilt► 4.i ,. lirvetier hi viulutiutl of th.• Ilud1a Art Slot, i1071.11 151 CuLltltttr. 724, ilti ILA'311 -Sri.' 675 , • 1 , , r , , l City Ccunci .r ty of Huntington Beach , California e►f�y '�r C z g t October 1, 1986 4, y' . Res Conditional Use 'permit :No . 86-25 �r Mayor 'and. Council Members g p es5 for several This hearin has been in roc months', therefore , it becomes necessary to repeat some items . In reviewing t Mrs . Leonard' s letter of appeal there are many items most of. is Which are no t worthy of comment , however, I would ' like, i0 . ' correct the statement t?t at. there were only ' thre'e neighbors who objected to her application. There were th ree sp okesrnen for ' a -large ,lumber who either signed petitions o: sent letters. q I £ written objections are ignored then written support should also be ignored leaving Mrs . Leon,.ird without any neighborhood J support . The support for Mrs . Leonard at all the public hearings } has been from 'outside special interest groups , parents of her , pupils and representatives of day care associations .;r .i As I have stated before the residence of 'rir' s . Leonard -'doe's not; ` comply with Uniform Building Code requirements .fnr a day care center and the 'home wou ld no longer comifly as �a dwel-ling since ? 5 it no lon er � would meet Mini MUMresidential area regii�remdnts '� mum i for 12 children and 4 'adult's . (the home 'does not comply for ;6 i children and 3 adults) . The items involved are.. exits and. fire separation of house and garage ('l exits , 1 hour fire separation wall ; fire dampers for air dutslr Y ei.urnair and �.l hour assembly fog: door) A repot t in the case f,i�le states ' that day care centers: t +; 'of this type are exempt from ,code 1req­uirements . These items pert if to lifejsafety of the occuptirits and lowering fire resistant requirements is 'not " in this (',interest • of public , health , K safer and eneral welfare . I question the. ibrl�ity of two �+ adults to safely remove 12 infants and toddlers . from a burning structure . There are too often news a er 'accounts of two .parents 'r1 x unable to remove 3 or 4 children from a burning family home . ,r .) allowing this oY ceupancy to occupy a non-comf OTni:.n, g .,, structuTe , does the City and/or State assume liability? Since this , applicant has been denied permit twice by ' the {untin'g"ton Beach , . Planning Commission and once by the City Council previously , does the City Council assume liability? There seems to be no, requirement for the operator to carry liability.7insurance and in case of child injury or death the same parents now supporting this petition would seek compensation from other sources, . A mother with small children and keeping 2 or 3 other children would fit the family image and be acceptable to , most neghtiorhoods . This is not the case and is purely a commercial operation within a residence . A commercial operation combined with the itoi.se 4 resulting from 12 children can and does render the adjacent homes undesirable property to the present occupants and/or to future occupants which is detrimental to'' the neighborhood and in turn . i is detrimental to the Ci.ty's General Plan and, .and Use Plnin. The k you for consideration of my views . .I ` e"s W. ReAgin � �: . 3 25 Argo "Circle , flunti'iSton Beach , Ca.lxfunix€� ., JV-W t�l .. .._, ate t7ctobe'r ' 6,. 1986 w �IIi �Y Y YYI Submitted to: Honorabl Cil SubmittMd by: Charles W. -Thompson', City 'Administrato�-�' ti James W. PaliDirector ,: ar.* ji 1 priprtidby n, Development. Services � ' ,, 'CONDITIONAL USE :.PERMIT N0:'. 86�-`25 AFPEAL DAY. E Subject. CENT ER APPLICANT: BARBARA ;LEOl 1�RD;: , Consistent Mth Council Policy? Yes Now Palic r or Exception , Statement of Issue; Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alteinative A'ctlons,Attschrnent=: This item was continued on . August 4 , 1986 , to the 'October 6 , '1986 meeting'. with the public hearing closed to; allow, time for a ,code amendme nt on day care centers to come before the City, Council.: Code � ., ,.� September 16 ,, P - doing, before t,he: , Amendment No. 86--30 was scheduled for public he Planning Commission on p 1986, but • e to the .zateneas 'of the hour, it was.' continued to October 7, 1986. The,•oidinance. is Proposed to be scheduled for your meeting of October 20' ,'1986: It ; should be noted that . since August 4 , 1986 , two . lar.ge family day,' care centers have. been approved by the Planning Commission . Staff continues to support the applicant 's request and reeamindhds ap proval of Conditional Use Permit No . 86-25 by„ the City .Council . The request; meets all requirements of the current code for,,, day. "care centers. The request would meet all but one requirement of .;the , -proposed ordinance covering day care centers, if, it is adopted . This provision states a minimum distance between large family day . , 1 Sihce there is an existing' jarge family care, centers of 1,CI00 feet . '� ' day raze Icenter approximately 300 feet away at 17272 .Whetmore ,Lane (approved by Conditional Use Permit No. 81-4 ) , the applicant 's requested location would not meet this criterion should it ' be adopted as part of Code Amendment No. 86--30. ATTACHMENT: 1 . Appeal letter dated September 21 1986 j 2. A&r ea Map 1 3 . Original RCA dated August 41 1986 and July 21 , 1986, with { attachments , including proposed code amendment . JIIP:JA:kl.a (6286d ) P10 4AM ■ rT -... _ Ilk may, `,�!''��?�s�'Jrr'R.,#�� `Y L i'' .1�. �i�"+J:Y X ��� :! �?' t �.t�• �' �i frctti�!�16, ir•'�.K�1'{• �� 4 ,t �� �w a.!L 7' M�H + K` •!+S'it A1. ► j r ti; tit ' _ , , ! �;•E!y'(; 1�- i:gMtSL/.� tiF:��► °CAM •:`, y� f' 1 �� j y rid } I` t . , I NTE A �' IV'1' Y �' + t �1,i� w } .• •r 7 �O � �lyyri_ � ♦ *^' .•'.- l":.iyyLft: ,�..�{' , :. r pyr�f�wrr'•w•N�� ,t ?'1i•!y�'� 1+t R �1 � :7 h..•�t }' � � l/ �iN�y 4!( �eiH• ,' �"•s ... t .r +�t�r 'I ,.«+'!i} u L; ; ,ty •Y ti T �� ITN_, N+' 'r4 1� r f� r ',� 1� a.•' K , ° �x�+ Lr'L} � 1'i♦ , •♦. t /L it�.:�1: ~ 1 '1 s��r � rest• �1 ttA'lJa +h so a • � Charles ,�W T t - P n ml Ay � City Administrator tr ~. J '._� �r:�.� ��,;�;,�1,�� , w����,zrur'� �>.,,'t'v•�;�� �, 7:1� ♦ 1 yO ctMo• e1It CODE AMENDKENT:2;N0• 86�30 iL! Subject ON BEACH ! � CITY OF HUtJ`T INGT . , + .�, ,.;,� � ,��a s��,�r.,�� � +���;.t ,,; ►► , a ., _.:,' . ! DAY CARE CENTERS p+'•i,/ -`cif F t Y► i .h �t 1 ' G ' y' ! r J� rs r'� J ^( ���;♦ ' f C �n it directed staff to lre_v{ ,.,w.� , • < Au ust= 4; `4986 , y the'•�City Counc 9 Y Y • - • �•• a centers ••�� tho e''•that* .provisions for.,1arge� famil day car �F, lop, ,� +4, ttiat "fir= ; c P - and develo a revised ''ordinance��, from seven to twelve children ) , P' " ajar, ���_ e` �.. no would 'be "in! keeping with State*tl K, +'butoFn o piotrat n ; t only .. .. .,•. g alt' ofr;thQi;.0 Y tC� + are currentl _,. �. ' more restrictive provis�.ons than Y code State law permits cities ,"to have reaso . ,.,�. ,, ' : aiik'3ns'at�ndanoiee�� `t, r tached,'hae � ifteeng: 15} near s aci.-i and concentrationt traffic control r- p g tP1D control. The draft ordinance � .,�,=.. r ,�,..� .,{.W��t:, o ,,,l�s'� ;. t > .� Many f be--, added to the requizements for day • 4 ,, arifications of existing �City4practYces ren. ents are simply c1 re uialready 9 and policies or provisions required by the State .p, z 1'. F , annin Comma public . The P1 g . ' ssion had the code amendment ;suet for .-p hearing on Se tember 16 � 1986. Due to 'the .�lateness of :the 'hour,' the p Tannin Commission continued the item `until their meeting ~of ! Planning Staff W311 set the; pub ctober,,20 , ` October 7, 1986 . '� Tic hearing for e r 1986 after Planning Commission recommendation . . f Jt1P :JA:k1a ( 6287d ) Attachment : Draft Ordinance .+r . u' .� a- •.l of �;. �. 1., . � 'V ' , � u �•�.s"+,�1:r 1>~rl,`+';'�C/=�^Y ��,`I1��t'�+_I� rt�,�';�`gt}•��Yt'� ' ✓3.•,r 7�, �,,��L �i ,, i. _y'^' rf -;• If••tl � ! • r .,,titp ! 7 . . � r � i.�';; re ••.� � �� r ' ••� �• :�� } + y,. r .'.� � 1 r. q,7, e , l`i, {Y +1jj'��y • .-.• � 5i�1 Q� eS �...���, ,},i)y) SJ• .. + , .��♦.,^a {r,al � 1 M'•.�.n ,� i• �r1� ,�.Z� •.1�.•f�.�•�y`rr}��i'X�n•�,�,i� +�� �. `� +__•!! +t,?4!:'�,_�?4`r :a.j�ti.:}w Y_ t�iia; �-�� s ljii+tWIAtt: 141XA,?rt - > ;. - '.--. •�+.,N.. •r.v ..A.-r.wls !! ♦ ., 1 .r.: ,•..f �.: . •I i ;t.../ ->•'! • ,w,•.w .wY.il ♦ABMHwr1V+, .�J1w , • 3 , CODE , ENDMENT NO: 86 ' 30 ,i DRAFT ORDIMANCE , SEND 'UNCLASSIPIED' PROVISIONS REGARDIKG DAY CARE ' CENTERS v t 1'l+ ^��� `' - ' tti ` .'(+, � '{ r + `, tJ�,,^. } ?'�+•i + 2 r;jr �t � w. ' 1! + 1t5i. , ,�K�Y jl 'twAjP' NI� f�7�lFi� ;Srl. +Ii}; tf ±.L'• jr4? FY :.4i� Y;T Xi�r ,. S �Yp9630� ., � PERMI'Y'TEDUSES:` The; following ;rYist .includes u$es at ossess character stiffs of " ,`` t,. . ,tK ....E �..... suc unique sand special ,form as ,to h z ; make j„inapra"cti�cal' tihei`'r ` automatic , inclus'ionas a' perm'i�kted wuseriii`� any 'distr'i'ct . -; The '16ca't o'to , a'nil : operation of 'such "uses shall ; tie' suta ject for atppioval a conda.tional use permit` by the Pl'anni'ng 'Commi's'siQn • . , . , •and . any addtional��prov^f'sions •:included�• herei'n . Uses:.mark'ed wfth ' an - asterisk shall not be 'permitted in any residential district . , D. Day,- care centers for more than six ,childien subject to the following provisions': ( 1 ) Seventy-five, square feet,., of 'outdoor , play , area. perk . child: Thirty, 'five .square- feet..-°of,,'indoor.:'play area per. 'child Outdoor ;play..-,,azea . shall .be, grassed and enclosed'.by a six , foot high . masonry 'wall , :.Any gate entry shall be securely fastened. (2) Min imum 10% of pa_kigr n area shall be lands caped� where applicable. ( 3 ) The :total .enrollment for the large ,day .:care. Center';: . shall be -established by the -PlaWing ;n . Commission : a-nd shall include the applicant 's own children under the age of 12 years. partment clear..: : (4 ) Fire De• ance• shall be obtained 'pritor to the operation of the 'daycare center . (5 ) Hours of operation shall be established by the Planning Commission . - i 6 a licant shall subm j }. . t ) The it. a ropy of the .Orange � County Social Services"`License prior to the -operstion of the day care Facility. ( 7 ) Such Facility ^shall not"be located. closer ttian 1-i,000 feet to another large family 'day care center in a single is'oily residence. (S ) The a_ lica PP nt shall obtain a bu• siness license .prior to the ,operation of the day care facility. (9 ) aditioacto the 0�6` required fui�ly, _encloeed i parking sp es, ` a. minimum of 'two te{on ,si parking ' spaces shall be, p'rovided for day::.care centers :located s�ithin a reeidential -tone ., ' , .Day . Cara -Centeras _,located Wit• .. onehhalf t 1�/2 )lile a 'r6v id e one 'and Paces Per classroom, , „,.+.�� .Y'w ♦'..�t.•,,,f i7t �� •.. �x .":.' 1 rr ',.., ,r. K .. �• r 1a_'�i �� ”y 5�;.. F +rk`.� �.�.r+� w•M•w}.•w1v�r wtK`t+�G'�.iuvwy� '��„«+r,..,. •w•r+:tt�'v,,,,Y. + a.•..•e.�C�N.- w�y� I,:t.yrq.�+...�Tn,.;'`M/�'rw.�rwM ..•..y�Alrr.•.. ram.. .. �'. a► .T fr L> ,: ,• �, i t�f�y f"� ,1�s rJti G,irrJr r .� 4. aT 4. Y . lL.+u. ,.i' r � .s r t t:�? i •� ,� t�,j• � ri �f I t'1� t� t t Rqi:) � • �� + i� i 7 '� t''T � � V ri-' � S ...Y15N` n � � ,� .1 11 [.r"'�r /'1�+) r4�.� t ". tf• t t � 1 #i ii. t -, t Imo' . = 4 r+�.l t10) Ga.ragen:,shall' not be. used . n conjunction .w tti' 'tho 'day, care opeiation, wi ih the exceptf on of parking vehicles. �? ' �='r f+:y;• �4��. •i.: ,'}1 $ .!�'. i 1 •:r)'�r !'.�'+ 1 �M �11?. Loading and unloading, ofi�chiI ren frox ,vehicle within a�t ea tial' dish is , ,•," - :` r; an :.th � � r r et'ar3veway ;ap lioved tk epe �a ,. p 'par ingl `realorbd re tltited , fronttof L the` 'facilit ,. y, A11`-��loadi• ofD ng`I id unlaa 1 , ,, `ding.� children: within''a commercial `distric0; ;shall 'omly •be permitte'�3 from ap _ . proved parking ace.-.a . t12r)" Child`rEn '&ttendin the day care' facil` tstiall: k,e_. 9 y.. restricted ho:;- the = first .'floor and,-designated play areas only unless .supervised by an adult. ' _13 i = � - �. . ` ' -� The Day Care: Facility . sha11, ,'rompiy with` all applicable req'uirements of mthapter 8.40 j;oise control of ~the Wahi'cipal Code, (14 ) The Planning Commission;'reserves ' the nrfght _toy revoke. . . the a rova1,76 f a ,dr care: , Y fac11ty rtf. a viola ion 'of :. Pthe conditions •o 9 f approval ,occurs. �,11 revocation roceedin s shall be preceded by a 'public 'hearing: (15 ) � Approvals .for day, care facilitie's wit' in`the Rl, :. ' Single Fanny ,.Residential District ' are ferable and the dwell`in _ own non=trans g :shal'1 be er , occup=.. d . 4 ;a 4 'a. ii r _ J ++ . . • is k{ _ , — _ , , r to 1 •., 1i •t ii. ^j L.ft w �F �� 11 .' '. f 1 7 1 t 1 A •T•J . 3 +•,j•1 • is :- ��, ;i.. 1 .., IrY 'l 11 1 tt :, 1 4',•, 1 Nt ;.l5 � ,�;�ytlll"'i,,t $ , `! t i � 1 !'' • d. * l .�. �. i � Ih4f 1 .A A�' 'S '{�. 1, r i':'•,1 t } , ;i } s Y 'e t 1�' �{ >,•�� .lt '•f�rx �,'Y� �; +•, , �, �'). lG,^. �'• '.'�.f rG4t: Ytf"J{, � it 3. ' LL} Jtii;�r, �:�5 � {{ t ,1., i.. 1 ,.• � �jE. 1, �i i r .i:to „ ` f+ ,x:•. .1:._,_�l:�t.6`:Y.��_�.4�_•'�;r ---al,:�:.t*+w`�sal.(` t,.�'Ir �t• .�f_{t``,.. r.' sS_ _ 1:�a.w.i t t .1�•.�t ;l}� 1 .{w'r.� tt v.. ,+..,. �J.'(1A�. . .�f t� 4` +t�11 •'t r tt + * V.� �. fi t• f.r. f+ it� +• `. oN A RGo x7, 'oT/Yc N f0 Cvo11 , Q 1 Tf/ TI-ld 46L4Lr,' i i E 0 46 AT 4ZL Pt r • ' Jt.. Ott flC/L RO rh �TF Yoe, t✓/,j'/y ?a 0 ,trrl'T me fll-/ , I , 4 t. tE y , I ��• 4 .] s :�{{ s� .V$ ,.rig, tiF •�':* /7.2 '71 �} Sd PM � r���--`•�� sic---�- �.;,. of f14�rTi•vG-To� Qc f/ 2.avo es 0 A r, p G� e7 �e r ail 7 R O UE FUR CITY COUNCI =' ACTION Date August 4 , 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City AdministratorC(A Prepared by: James W. Pal in , Director , Development Services/ �. 4--ktp Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 86--25 (APPEAL) -- DAY CARE CENTER APPLICANT: BARBARA LEONARD Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ ) New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Altemativu Actions, Attachments: ' BACKGROUND: This item was continued by the City Council on July 21., 1986 . Additional information was requested from staff regarding the specific requirements of both the State Department of Social Services and the City. LICENSING: The County of Orange requires a large family day care license for in-home day care centers serving 6 to 12 children . Prior to issuing such a license, the County Social Worker checks arrest records , child abuse .c:ases and fingerprints. A tuberculosis test is azard andutheaava©labilityoof materialsn nand supplies .is conducted fHuntington or safety hBeachS , Fire Department clearance is required before the license is .issued by the County. For large family day care centers , one assistant j must be on the premises at all times . The Uniform Building Code, , Uniform Housing Code, and Uniform Fire Code do not apply to clay care facilities pursuant to action by the State Legislature . The State Fire Marshall is charged with approving each facility for P y safety requirements such as smoke detectors , fire extinguishers . In addition , the State Fire Marshall requires that all activities of the day care facility be provided can the first floor of the home . There is no requirement with respect to number of bathrooms . The state 's space requirement per child .is: 35 square feet indoors and 75 square feet outdoors . However this space requireme ,% pertains only to commercial pre--schools and day care faciliE'i.es , j The State still uses this space requirement as a rule of thumb ,when calculating space for residential facilities ; however , each case is reviewed individually. The City 's space requirement is also 35 square feet indoors and 75 square feet: outdoors for any type of day care facility 1 r10 4M4 —_ Large day care facilities may care for sever to twelve children. The figure must include the children �.ihich are residents of the , home . The following requirements are made on a large .--are facility: l: State Fire Marshall approval . 2. Obtain the required City nondiscretionary permit . 3. Previous experience is required of the Facility operator (i .e . previous teacher in a pre-school ; several years of business experience in the child :are field ) . All day care facilities are required to have a State license . The license is renewed every three years . - !to annual inspection of the facilities are conducted unless a complaint is received . The State does not have a cap on the .density of day care homes per block. This is up to individual localities to regulate . ;! All day care applicants must attend an information and orientation meeting conducted by the State. In addition , andextensive , background check, is completed on each applicant prior to the t issuance of a 11cense . ' e ''s office is preparing a report Please note that the City Attorn y p p 9 P Under separate cover reflecting the legal questions raised by the City Council . '- ATTACHMENTS: I , o;r,ift Code Amendment prepared for day care provisions . II . O iginal RCA dated July 21 , 1986 , including following attachments : 1 . "Research Information" submitted by applicant . 2. Letter of appeal 3. Vicinity map d . Petition/letters in opposition to proposed project (5 pa'g s ) 5. Planning Commission staff report and minutes dated June 17, 1986, including: a . Site plans and floor plans b . Narrative describing project c . Petition regarding traffic d. Petition in support of Conditional Use Permit No . 86--25 e . Declaration from current day care parents f. L-ctters in support of Conditional Use Permit. No 86-=25 JWP:JA:pb (5730d) RCA - 3l4/86 -2 _. REQUES-I" FOA CITY COUNCIPACTION Date _, July 21 , 1986 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrators • 7 Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director , Development ServicefCARE Subject; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 86--25 ( APPEAL) - D CENTER - APPLICANT: BARBARA LEONARD Consistent with Council Policy? Yes ( l New Policy or Exception Statement'of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF 1SSUE: This request to increase the number of children permitted for day care from 6 to 12 was originally denied by the Planning Commission as Conditional Use Permit No. 65-3 on March 5, 1985, due to neighborhood opposition and co,.icerns for noise, parking and traffic congestion . The City Council upheld the Planning Commission ' s denial on April 1 , 1985 . The applicant chose to reapply after one year' s time had elapsed, as required by code when a request is denied . The applicant has submitted a new conditional use permit (No . 86-25) along with several petitions in support of the day care center, stating that no traffic problems are foreseen as a result of the expansion of the day ca'.-,e center to a total of twelve children . Other petitions have been submitted in opposition to the project . At the Planning Commission meeting , two people spoke in opposition of the request and two people spore in support . RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission action and recommendation on June 17 , 1986 : ON MOTION BY WINCHELL AND S'ECOND. BY ROWE, , THF PLANNING COMMISSION VOTED TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86-25 SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING •VOT?O : AYES: Rowe , Winchell, Schumacher , LivYctgood, Mirjahangir NOES : Erskine ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN: None FINDINGS i:'OR DENIAL: 3. . The granting of the conditional use permit will adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach . 2 . �7he p P consistent with ' the :. ro osal is not consiste he citf s General Plan .of Land Use . 140 V" ; , 1 r 3 . Access , parking and number of vehicle trips to the day care will cause undue traffic problems for this neighborhood . 4 . The proposed day care will have a detrimental effect due to noise upon the general welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing in the neighborhood . ,5. Numerous adjacent neighbors testified that a home care facility is not compatible with their R1 neighborhood and that the noise created by a home care facility is detrimental to the enjoyment of their homes. Staff recommends approval of Conditional. Vee Perm.-t No . 86-25 . ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting approva) to care for twelve children in her home . At the present time, the County has licensed the i applicant for 6 children. Since the site s located close to two major arterials (south of Warner and west of Goldenwest`)`, making it easily accessible to parents when dropping off their children, staff did not feel traffic would be a problem. Traffic impacts should also be minimized by the fact that parents come for their children at staggered times throughout the day and that there is space for three cars on the driveway of the residence . A petition signed by 4 of the 13 Argo Circle residents states that they do not foresee a traffic problem as a result of approval of this project. Section 9331 of the Ordinance Code requires that 75 square feet of outside play area be provided for each child (for a total of 900 square feet ) and that the play area be planted with grass and enclosed with a 6-foot--high fence . There is approximately 1 ,044 square feet of usable landscaped area enclosed with a six ,foot high block wall . The Code further requires 35 square feet of indoor play area for each child (a total of 420 square feet) . There i.- . approximately 709 square feet of indoor play area provided -- the children . The applicant ' s plan complies with all code cequ. ' :-+ments . Since the time that the original conditional use permit was denied, the applicant has acted to mitigaie noise impacts on surrouridin"g , properties. Tye applicant has replaced a wood fence ate the rear of the property with a 6 foot high block wall . The applicant will be required to hire an assistant at the time more than six children are cared for , according to State licensing requirements : With the addition of this assistance, the applicant believes she will be able to supervise the children more closely and therefore be able to control the noise level . EOIR611MENTAL STATUS Tha proposed project is exempt Clasa 3 :action 15103 . from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act . FUNDING :SOURCE: Not applicable . RCA 7/21%86 -2- {5 591d ) AL ERNATIVA' ACTION:• A " rwe Conditional Use Permit.:r 4,- N;�, 86•-25 subject to the folluwing findings and conditions of approval : ,FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1 . The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington, Beach . l; 2. The proposal is consistent with the City ' s General Plan of Land Use . 3 . Access , parking end number of vehicle trips to the day care will not cause undue traffic problems for this neighborhooa. 4. The proposed day care will not have a detrimental effect due to noise upon the general welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing in the neighborhood. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1 . The applicant shall hire an assistant to be present during the hours of operation , upon acceptance of the seventh child for day care . 2 . The site plan dated May 8, 1986, shall be the approved layout. 3 . The day care operation shall be limited to a maximum enrollment of twelve children . - 4 . Prior to operation of the day care operation , the applicant ;hall obtain approval from Orange County Social Services 'Department. 3. The applicant shall file with the_ Department of Development a Servicer a. copy of the Grange County license which permits care of twelve children . 6 . The day care facility shall operate no longer than between the hours of 7 : 30 AM and 5 : 30 PM daily. 7 . The applicant shall obtain a business license from the City of Huntington Beach . 8 . The garage: shall not be used for the day care operation. 9. The P1'anni n the went ke n? Commission reserves the right to reviawJr'evo pp this tionstof�theutermsroftthisravarov. , , . P viola pp al , or ion . 3 0 . ,. , violet 4.,,, of 'tee � .. applicable. zoning laws , or 'upon evidence that tl�e :'occupancy is detrir,ipntal to the neighborhood; any , such:.'deci`6fon ,sh6ll,.'be preceded by notice to" the applicant, "a public hearing, and shall be based on specific findings . 'RCA - '7/21'/'86 .-3- (5591'd.) ti -1 ATTACHMENTS � 1 ., ,' Letter of appeal 2. Vicinity map ,n c osit,ion ' �3 . Petition,/.lett�cs � pp� to proposed pro�eot t5 pagesf 4 . Planning Commission statt report and minutes dated June 17, 1986, including: s. site plans, ztnd Floor plans b. Narrative describing project. c . Petition regarding traffic d . Petit-Lon in support of Conditional Use ,Permit No . 8ti-25 e . Declaration from current day care parents f . Letters in support of Conditional Use Permit No . 86-25 JWP :JA:kla v i I i 7 p,CA .7/21/86 4 (5591d} 36 till cti nK f CITY QIFiC�1 CkL1 �IlfI�11KC10H 6E • - Jt� �1 17242 Argo Circle - Huntington Beach, CA 92647' June 25, 1986 Mayor and City Council Members of the City of. Huntington- Beach 2000 Main :Street 7 Huntington :$each; "California ' Re: Appeal of Denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 86--25 i Dear Sirs: Please consider this letter its a formal notice of peal of the decision of the Planning ^ommissloja ( "Commission" ) to deny my application for a conditional use permit ( "CUP"') to have a large family day care home ( "day care home" ) in nay residence . This appeal is made on the grounds set .forth in this letter. 1. The Commission Ignored the Weight of Evidence "nd Testimony Presented to It. I and persons speaking on my behalf presented the following testimony: (a) The Commission' s Staff found that tho day care -home would not adversely affect noise and traffic conditions and thereby recommended the approval of the CUP. (b) Cri steta S. Pagui ri qaa , an attorney , on' behalf of Public Counsel, explained the purpose of,,the,. Child, Gaye r Act wY,ich encourages the establishment of day. ;care homes and is , codified in California, Health and Safety'Code 15974' 3Vet. 'se . -' The - act distinguishes day care centers from day care` , , homes and explicitly. re4uires, day• care homes to be establ•iahed. in the home where` the care is givers. 1 _. .._...,... _. ......l a.Mw..1fi ••.•—, .. .. .f lr•+._4:..♦.•..'. • •'f':'.•`..Y11 4"1...'...l..•v♦w.H ..... ,•M.1.......,. Page 2 (c) Concerned parents spoke on the need for child day carer homes in our community and their desire to have child day care homes located in their neighborhoods. A smother where child is an my waiting ,list for day care testified to the diFficulties in finding any aderiate day care for her son. (d) Mothers who currently use my services attested to my reliable, effective and safe care of children and the lack of traffic congestion. (e) Neighbors spoke on the lack, of significant increase in traffic, or noise due to the day care home. .Several neighbors, including those adjacent to my homy, testified that noise and traffic from my home was _rot a r1roblem. ..1 also submitted a petition of neighbors in Argo Circle dated 1986 (Attachment No. 7 ) , which states that the neighbors are not bothered by excessive noise or traffic from my home. (e) A number of speakers testified to my efforts. to minimize noise and traffic: (i) I 've constructed a costly 6' block wall to buffer the alleged excessive sounds of children playing. ( ii ) I 've adopted out a pet dog who alleg- edly barked excessively to further minimize noise. (iii) I ' ve scheduled the pick up and drop off times of children on a staggered basis to minimize traffic. ( iv) I 've not received ANY complaints of excessive noise from. ANY neighbors. ( I have asked them several times this pa3t year. )• See attached letters In contrast, the opposition represented a single inteLest -- that of homeowners. Three neighbors presented the following testimony: ( a) One resident who lies beh ind me on -.Taurus Lane alleged that sounds of chi ldren invaded hiss .privacy;' that there was traffic congestion, and 'th'at day care "centers" ewer their property value&. M Application' nIs ; for ,'& -,large P p Y ( y family day care home, which unlike a center, would permit. a F ------ .�•-�---.�..r. ��- . .., .- ._. .- — ....:�YI�: ..:._`r. Ka•�a. ..nr...=.`r 7 r _ .rM�Mid1Y'I '7,.StJ^f.)v, ..tl a ,1 Page 3 maximui.-i of only 12 chi l drem. 72iis residents' a .legations were not supported by the evidence before the Commission. (b) Another resii:2nt who lives on ►±?`t6s Lane and who works rotating shifts testified that he 4: -. It sleep because of ALL noises, not necessarily those generate•a From -my home.. in fact, this neighbor lives sufficiently far fr sat. my home that it would be virtually impossible for him to trace the i noise which he complains of to my home. (c) Anuither resident who lives diagonally across the street from me stated that he did not wants a day carry "center" with twelve children across the street. Again, this opposition was not to my day care home itself, but to pny day care home. 2. The Commission Abused its Discretionary Tt va s 1100 p.m. by the time my Application came up for hearing. Most of the Commissions, ,my- szuppartera and I worked all. day and sat patiently from ? ;GO p.m.- , befori a we were called. Perhaps partly due to the late hour, the CornnniE sion seemed inattentive and abused or misused its powers in the following way: (a) The Commission ignored the report compiled and written by their own staff, which recommended approval of :the CUP and had made findings contrary to the viowa raised by the neighbors opposed 'ra my Application. The Commission did not question, Staff with regard to any of their findings or "their ;+ recommendation, which was unusual since the Commissioners guestioned staff on ALL items on the agenda preceding my Application. (b) The Commission appeared to single my case out fir discriminatory treatment. As I was at the podium-, I was abruptly e � be�esre£. , Shortly after I began, the Chairman interrupted . •.r m y testimony by asking stuff if the. . , timer was on. No other applicant or speaker, Inc luding,,.those spoakers testifying againt t my, request, were requested, to ' be brief. I believe this adversely affected my presentation. (c) The. Commission voiced objections; to niy day care home because, i,t is a " large" business. These remarksa by . the.`Commissi,on ignores two significant points.. . First, the need for additional child �sera9 -to "tYia tnagnitude,'.o�' oints ' out �the Commission s i norarce . wises, Aa,.'one neighbor s<, 00 Page 4 testified, "there are vevy few small children an 'Taurus Lane.. "", and the neighbor; i who opposed the Application are without small children and have other interests adt,,3rse to the provision of quality child care. Second, and more significantly, it ignores the avowed purpose of the California Day Child Care Act, which was enacted to encourage the creation of family day., care homes. The Day Care Act was in reaction to the growing need for child day care facilities due to the fncreane in working parents and expressly because .many parents "prefer child day care located in their neighborhoods in, Enmily homes. Cal. Health & Safety Code § 1597. 30(d) . Thun, the day care home .rus,f- of necessity be in a presidential neighborhood. (d) The Commission failed to weigh the relevant testimony and decided, without factual. support, that the legitimate needs of the community as a whole were less impor- tant than those of three neighbors, whose coincerns regard'ng noise and traffic were unzutbstantiated and certain.l.y highly controverted by other testimony and the Staff findings. (e) The Commission. s constant denial of requests for increased day care capability has a chilling effect on dal care in the City of Huntington Beach and is tantamount to creating an "adult only" community. In addition to the above points, I vi sh to point out that there was NO negotiating or compromi,ing ,this issue at the hearing, I sin open to compromise for all o, ' our sakes, including a reduction in the maxiimin permissible n :m e'r of children in my day care home. Please make every, effort to schedule this appeal early un your agenda and to carei'ully consider the pain:s I 've raised in connection. with this appeal. �I Sincerely, Barbara Lec.nard BL/CSP: rsta AVE WARNER ` Fit J;j : R •� C4 M� - __ ! 4 rwJ�v 2 ----� GF-E ' 11 H3 +�Ir•rv{ t Rt R1 R1 R1 { t I R1 RI CF-R� RIno B:..__ ._�...*.�!. ml ! Rij f'S Rt RI R1 ! _,cat r n•1+ RI CF-F NI(-BARK M M • Rt T~X�+I___ _ rif cif-r- c. n tt'�.�s.�•��1• t 3. at Rf • 1: !� RI I RI H! Rt AI AI at RI RI /+ Rf Fit tiff $too R; r R1 R1 .41 R 1 R J a RI �# RI RI Ri �r - Rt 1,c Ri. CO 1r a_.. t S K� (�.tai• cr.� RI JY R-CD R9 1-CU CA l JA fit 14 V. ml -co MI-CD rut-—)., I Ott . ~�- ( oil CF—E. Fr j. RI Ri RI Rt /1 �� Jc CD =J"at JR1 fit I J1 a HUMNOTON _K4^'±, FEANNtNG� [1v1stO1V x FC.R S£. G'd, NE mv' 114, .;EC 2:f r 5 S.R!I 1Y 16 5»�� 08 nor J V •• a1 •o It 11 1'4 !f It Z' :f JJ Jl !/ :7 :1► .c •. . .• .• - _ MA T 3 a L t 1. • o = ,,, W 9 ~ Sam a. r •. a. .«_••I• of•a• '• ,g t�i• - IG!?Glr Ga�vE � % YIN + • - - •f .. � N .1 •a ,r , as•I �'� .90 r • • !. �i0 li R U 4t >; w � �^�: '� � n ^ [avrsl 1 Cn4t[£ �_ C 1 -1 o a i W i t71 (D `✓ cD ` !� 2 f1.•T/ .V if - q [t f1 [,!r• f Z IN ^ • � e : JJ f' v • t Ld 304 on n22 o ~ tt w I. r•.• 1Y7 A f• j t J1 • �� j 12l C" .6 ~ G w 2 r� i is • r1 , a • T. • AO•'w170� -� tf w.•.•a•. (¢v' a o : t :A a •.. _� aJ •� •� + 1 i u s ,s j b.TL�.l�vs pati'7 :' ____—•-- 7 1 W 2 ••N^ .p De Ja }f is f•• �4. ;. Ad ig fn 14�� N' • 2S 2 ICJ: 1fi • 16 13 • •� I: `• •s !r _ • V s'=aK _ �p 1/ � -`.+ y1 SI '.- � -.• Ji �) v v •� •.•n a/ Ii •�. � a s • i(.) • ------------------ttt � O �� i 2 s• : ; 134 ! elrrr o• 3! • 2a = NO 23 = •. _ 2e 2T IS Is 1 i 3 s.. • ! • �f s. w •• �,iv .o .o I z il o 0 oIS135 7.3.30 h1D 7190 � � • p tJ I) .. u • Iu Jf Jt o• 37 as t t J 3 is t •a 0 07 9 AMRCM/972 h T29 NOTE-ASSESSOR'S BLCCX t ASSESSOR'S MAP T.4 MARCH 1975 TR.AG mo M M M M ?r.79-25,,2T PARCEL NUA48ERS BOO *5 PAGE I3 .� + -22.23 SHOWN !N CTRttfS COUNTY Or psANGE ► M E d �N v SG�j tt LlCc{ Pudesopuses 4 eA YI9630 PERMITTED USEES . The following list ` inc that possess characteriscics of such unique and special form as to smite impractical their automatic inclusion as a pecmitted ' use in any distric=. The location and operation of such ur :_a shall be subject to approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission ind any additional provisions included herein . Uses marked with an aste ist shall not be permitted in any residential district . A . *airports and helioorts C . Churches Colleges , private schools , elementary and secondary public schools ( Minimum 10% of parking area shall be landscaped for the above uses . ) *Contractor ' s storage yards pursuant to Section 9631 *Convalescent hosnitals and sanitoriums •Commercial recreation and amusement enterprises , including bowling allays and skating rinks rs. Day care centers for more than six children subject to the following provisions : ( 1 ) seventy-five ( 75 ) square feet of outdoor play area shall be required for each child; provided further that in no circumstances shall the total outdoor play area be less than five hundred ( 500 ) square feet . Such play area shall be planted with grass and enclosed by a six ( G ) foot high masonry wall . Any gate leading to such play area shall be securely fastened , oc such play area shall be supervised at all times . (2 ) minimum 10A of parking area shall be landscaped wh?re applicable . s ( 3 ) The total enrollment for the large day care center shall be established by the Planning Commission and shall include the applicant ' s own children udder the age of 12 years . ( 4 ) Thirty-five ( 35 ) square Sept of play area shall be provided within the building for each child . , (5 ) Fire Department clearance shall 'be obtained prior to the operation of the day care center . (6) Hours of operation shall be established by the Planning Commission (7 ) The applicant shall submit a copy of the orange county Social Services License prior to the operation of th'e day care facility. - • 3k ( a ) The a.plicant shall obtain a business license prior to the operation of the day care c'p y facility , (9 ) in addition to the two required fully enclosed parking spaces , a minimum of two on-site parking spaces shall be provided for day care centers located within a residential zone. Day Care Centers located within a commercial zone shall provide one and one-half ( 1-1/2 ) spaces per classroom. i ( 10 ) Garages shall not be used in conjunction with the daycare operation , with the exception of parking P . P P 9 vehicles . ( 11 ) Loading and unloading of children from vehicles within a residential district shall only be permitted on the driveway, approved parking area or directly in front of the Facility . All loading and unloading of children within a commercial district shall only be permitted From approved parking areas . 12 ) Children attending the day care facility shall be restricted to the first floor and designated play areas only, unless supervised by an aduic . ( 13 ) The Day Care Facility shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 8 . 40 , noise control of the Municipal Code . ( 14 ) The approving body ( ,itv Council , Planning Commission or Board of Zoning Adjustments reserves the right to revoke the approval of i day care facility if a violation of the coed: ons of approval occurs . Ali revocation prec ,t-dings shall be preceded by a public hearing. ' ( 15 ) Approvals for day care facilities within the Rl , single Family Residential Distract , are non-transferable and shall be owner occupied . - ....... yi I i r M 1 ' Ok 1r 19305 IAI e neighbors a:a not in opposition and :feel Barbara Leona �d 'sh�ld be issued a Contiti nal Use Permit from the City of Huntington Beach to allow her to take in additional day care children. I forsee no traffic _problems as the parents are very cautious in their driving and it is rare to see more than one car in front of her home at a time. They :are here a very brief time then gone. Dal, Care Homes do not decrease uroAerty_ values nor do they create excessive noise.- 4 I w - 1 ' ',( ( A. 1' �2 6 N 7 . a l� L ,, U. mu 44 �2 17 x t -tw`'•c,J1,• I.. ' 1 T i 'rd•is �r " r� +, Mv+1>t �.}0.rw...-y.ty^ 'r`wq+r�'R':;"1S, 3rtt."�YI'SS\1tN.v•.o+t•,- .isv,.........:." •r•i •,';h .+•w'1n+1..,_ — I — .,..,..�...... ;i -- 4 1986 IAIe neighbars are Not ill opposition and feel Barbara Leonard 'should be issued a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Huntington i:Pa:ch to do child day care in her home, I forsee no traffic problems as the parents are very cautious in their driving and it is rare to see more than one car in front of her house at a time . They are here a very brief time then gone. k IM^ '. (._.� . 'L 1 � � Z te y Wi Y *see b e l u,V O� -rat,., G �� Z C9 �E Ae r5 Ala . r top 9d, _ r AZ %--- _zz Jd - �tA� I J�v� w��, ,'`-� r�Ari,• � , L` j+� Q'1 ,�tt K '(w 6�., f .. ,i �_ L► `6L�i.1 - (�'j,�/ �� �• � PVC •44h' ! �, � � 1�jr .0 •• �•, i, �v values nor �do they create excessive 'noise tf ! s�•lt.. + f.i, t.4!'�.+ii���.�+i{�G'tM1:sMiMhe.«.1 — ...'Ww+r __+.I i _- .rrr _ w ```_�w..�_—_.,...--�—�. -- _• r.wr+�yr...f.�+�....� .; +yS'4Y7.� r F s"` �"l: t1t rT IAN 4-rTIj r : ,i \ .,,y - l."•1 :.a r ..r. rl,� l ,f 'K `.. '�1 r,l •St,ti, r ' ' " '� aX rF!• k}A}* F ebT 1 The -City of Huntington Beach ( City) requires me as p� the applicant of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) , fora Large family day care home (LFDCH) , to furnish , at my rA' expense the required varience report (maps & address 1_. }1E1 lables) so the City can mail the Notice of Public Hearing �► 'Z'A to all property owners within a 300 ft. radius of the exterior boundaries of my home . Since the City requires the public notices he sent to all property owners within the 300 ft . radius, it would seem that all those property owner' s voices should be heard as it is their neighborhood equallfir. It is their right as a property owner, to say to the City that a (LFDCH) will not create a loss in property values, excessive traffic or noise. It seems unlikely that the City would require the applicant to bear the added expense in having -the varience report to cover the 300 ft. radius if the City dosen' t hear their voices as being a property owner in the neighborhood. :1 • r ! 1' • r t f i Pv m I/`;!e neighbors are 'Not -in opposition and feed, Barbara I ?onard should be issued a Conditional Use Permit froin the City of Huntington Beach to do child day care in' her home. 1 forsee no traffic problems as the parents are very cautious in their driving and it is rare to see more than one car in front of her house at a time. They are here a very brief time then gone . LILA r 7 elf ...tom--� �—•.��`�••. q XU oly lip p. Aar I Ae,)Pivi i *see �,e, ��4; ��w� C, �� C Z �: �Sf✓�F' G� �� 9zG_Y7 "',�%' / �►'" C-a te .•�y- .l�C 11z3­ 9,:Z '• ga Olt J. Twa . s . L. r aT -. � Y . `�. 1••.•.r ♦ ••• � . ,�r . N � .�•,� 4i G:i �` i�.t�.rL:l 7����.% :,.�.i i� ^� •� '�.w yr+�, r•r�."•;.S f� {�/► •�� r h� �f t {��_ h 4�1 ��� � :�....w�.�..�...w ' - - _ � r� r�i ,...« \..—•.r.: t, r�-�'i.i ,ar••1.X.�It'�f•'T•/1'.;w�f'1t4� _ i.1 *'i!"_�tYi�'�.'+�.rw...ti.> .�...."'7rld71jr.:n.;K4,•�'C�L!}"� gn T/:'te ne-ighbors are n6t in opposition and feel Barbara Leonard Should be issued a Con ti tional Use Permit from the City of -each to allow her to tare in additional day care children. Z forsee no traffic nroblems as the parents are ver;,: cautious in heir, driving and it- is rare to .gee more than one car in from of her home at a time . The are here a very brief time then gone . y ✓ r r r - t► v e o do the crew 4e �a Care kior�ea do no � dee_ ease n oUei t , alu a nor s excessive noise. 1-e�t T J �- 41 4i to toe . LOF t F AV off, •- pi rs K DRIVE' h Q P P o S C Q-- VrTL4 L A, 41 so, `• J �'•. 29 f35 13G. >34 37 - 39 4p ssi C . O• uV r a e n w 23 � 2t C g• os 31 22 21 �2Q A02s• '\� .?.! .^? zi .74 s h _ ` . 41 V h •�� ' � tin 4" r� i�4 QN (�rr % � s o .. S6 — air 5o 43 , a N q 24 v c� t8 4 ti, TUcd/,W DRIVE` e U '• kn(volt u ��1`' uQ(C58 r""• rt r �•./ `.I �� f `. ^ a 2fi ._..�_�. 6 J ®r) 9. a 28 r 27 �5 la s�• �i 3q a LIM pFTi rio DRIVE Lu• ti3 �T 49y s s J•" � Ts`S• [t1 � � ••> �3 i 0 , (D No. .�0 4 ., � h 13 a 4► - . - a j n JEl s 31 c / Lc1 10 -OAR iC •3 S T A!U %G SJ SP Ma! �1 r0r_ of _.._Y•..._ _ - � r, - •, �• AT a60 N ° Z: nG� l rn D Cbj m .I 'J tit U - U �• �' N 0 1.'t r• .. /r \ V yr_ "^`'^.."� �a ty r --.Y1:•!.�•:^\ �, ,.,. �-..,. .,. w l,:♦ 'Yw..^.'.�:. •-+ On - the attached pe cition in opposition there are 12 valid signatures of which of these homes, both husband and wife wort Traffic & Noise I�/A 2 of these homes are located between a grade school and the applicant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Traffic noise N/A 1 of these homes have allowed their children (since they were toddlers , to date ) to play unsupervised in our public street . . . . . Traffic & Noise N/A Supervision & Street Safety is Keep in mind the residence on Taurus Ln who may be home during day time hours are subject to traffic and noise generated by Ocean View High School and Wintersberg School. try day care children, infants through 4 years, can hardly g^nerate any competition to this condition. How many valid signatures are left on the attached petition? iww...rw.,..wn.w'.` .., _ ', ...,.... .......... .. .... -....... ... .�.-..-..,. .... •.._ ....v. ,.�_ .. ..... . Y`�}i ' .r:M� �:M w•}�C t' . r ' `1 ;,w ,.... ._, .. ..,._..,.. ......,......,......._.... .�..._.•7TU1TTT1TTi 1 U 7 �' DEVELONMENT SERVICES ,. - • r CI7 E.,4S ETITI'ON TO THE CITY Off, NUN, INGTON EiEA +JUNE 1996 P.O. Box 190 `I Nuntin�ton Beach, CA 9Z6 48 ire , the neighbors of Barbara Leonard sign this pel i t i on requesting that She be deni ed i i c:ense to expand her day care center to 12 ch i ldreR, The location of her place of business at 17242 Argo Circle is in the center of a residential neighborhood which is zoned R--1 and designed for sin'gl e• ' family residences . The specific concerns which we obJect to are : I . Ito i se from the children which Is di scup t i' ve to our households . 2. Additional traffic 1n a eul de sac with limited parking space 3. Potential loss of property values . NAME ADDRESS 1 , BOTH 'd0RX , WISE ec TRAFFIC N/A /lt.tj r� e.s ��:�� h.�.�.. ��� 1i /�1.� k�cs c-� I4 c� g�-� � 2. t• f�G .� ,.r......_ �o':: :1C►R'r:, L�r: . 761 YOST DIOIS� & i`RA IC t•t/A lei G....1, iop _ ..-r N/A Ate: 1,'OTnI-,% 2 r . �a�u/.s n i �OT�v"S ( /'f N/A ARE 1N 300FT . RADIUS hC?SB £: 1'r'FIC `r:jA , . r sof C..L' :J r.�'�`.U.-REr�ii� t��Jl+�w�J 1-' 1J...;�1►7` / •�1� �� fir' s-� r �1�.�,►� _.. r� � , j ? ( L-i .. AVCR CF �l>> C-FF-a '�' eeh & 7!5 R�, 0, 01 LV6( i RE Letter o f June 141 1981 , by Mr. •.ur r a,y and Nx. and VcCIin mock a = ;; 16 � Nolse a. Each of these families have two children and these: ` children have friends. b . When all of those children are together, unattended , the;: do � create a much high r noise level, than my day care children as some of these children arc older, school age: 2 . �'Traffic a. Two of these children have been playing in our public street, unattended, since they were toddlers, other neighbors as well as myself have seen this happen on a regular basis, Ph b . A public street is not a playground. There are yards -to play in as well as several parks close by. c . Parents of the neighborhood children should be instructing their children on street safety and not give them the: false security of a cul de sac . d . A new petition signed by our neighbors stating no traffic Problem. 3 .)°Declining; uroperty value . a. This is speculation, not a proven fact. b. Large Family Day Care Homes that are: par: of the neighborhoods care just as much as do other residents coat keeping the neiL):borhood at-tractive . c . Often the day care home is the best kep-t- ho ^.e: on the block because the woman who lives there is at home all dad and takes special pride in her hones appearance. d . Since most mothers work , day- care is often seen by homebuyer, s ,As an asset to a neighborhood. It may even raise property •values. e. A Conditional Use Per:rit for a Ira►se ranil,, Day Care Hbme is a conforming use in a residen t ia1 zone. 'A 4. � Small home . a. Staff report sho•+is : 1 . Outdoor pl^y area Required: 900 sq . ft. F ovided : 1040 so . f;. 2. indoor play area Required ! 420 sq a ft. Frrvided : 890 sq . ft, o. Staff has made a c.-�-,s-,sight inspection i on o_ r ` 'r' I�1 :;rJ1C Rebuttal by : .arbara Leonarl �UNTINGTON BEACH ELOPMENT SERVICES 6-14'-86_. JUy .. .. }' Dear Planning Commissioner: P.O, Box 190 i. Huntington leach, CA 92643 We oppose granting a Conditi5n.-it: Use Permit at 17242 Argo Circle because of noise, traffic and declining property value. The oise factor is disruptive with the existing six children and the leve no'l.se is the same whether they are in the encl,3sed patio playroom or ii1 the backyard. The main reason we purchased homes on a cul de sac was because there is usually little or no raffic on a cul de sac. }fo never, if a permit is granted there would be s More cars coming dorm our street twice a day for a total of twenty-four car trips daily-generated from this one residence alcne. we ar n concerned that a large family day care facility would hinder our roperty value lie would not have purchased our hoc:es eight and fifteen years aw ere been a large day care facility in operation at that time. We feel ur street does not lend itself to a large family day care center. The 4iomes are smal especially a single lev21 such as the one in question. iia ink a large business of any kind is inappropriate in a low density residential area such as this We would very much like to keep our street of single family homes strictly residential. Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. Jeff Murray ;Sr. and Mrs. Ray McClintock ev :s 1 a f`. .�•:{/�` ' it l�:{:y� «{i'•( :rCi T�ti•1 Jy.'.i tit s`i�•r Y•�l� �,J i•I��••�I.-►'tK, ►: 1f vi••a^J.: r�' , .,�.t��► • , t � M. • 14g{r.r `L •'•`"at, 'a,:I •i l� �(.'r i;I•. •„ ► �;w.r 1 �M •rtr7w.'•�a a Z ; •t,�rr •' r '•� t• ti'i �.'' 1-It 7•y 1�'�•e. .,. �� ♦ �. wy..i�%�(r�.:ti.r i w .�•{ 4 r•. 1 5 •�,,y�•f_• l I• •t C Z, + M' 4W. ;:Pw ~.M�•��wy.��•���'�/t✓ �f* i •-►Y!✓M` ! •Jr� �ir��•fK{�s Y1r��'�%•(_{���►�,�',•�.y�.y•y` r f �~. �� •. •7w• r f�•�it � ' f!r' J .♦�I• f ' 'b,,.a��'1,..t'M•••ti �!/. �•'fci•yam i"t ;�,14 �, �,ti. /,,,•�•i•�ir;Y' �i371 -^..il ���tl'• ••7ili�l.i�' " , �� �. •.�tt'. +►'+'7�..J;�+ •+.';I,��Lf�_ f�t�sl:.Z�� '�:.�:•.]• �•�r� -�S. ��t•J. • ..,` :,tom t �J'� 1;" •1 ��'�'S!''�M•,�•. j�. ...`t•C�=�r`�,�•}}JJ..j•►��%+�+�:'���.,���t►.=t��`'•�iF�N r.r•.•iJ��•' '. ,• � i:f ' rlt••�•xj`i.� r ate. ��• e'•.•a'"t� �' •��-.��.itij 7r .�.�,,Y ♦'1,' t 1�.•...- a.* �' / +•.��1 ���/'� ' '• �'i.'v S'Q n i c to r e S l�'•��... :.;-1 •' '•''•:'i •��,t.Y►� '{• '_..-.�• rr�,•�,.�..: Show t�rro iteihbar ..', ,, - -�.:._ ._. - --- , .: *�.t•' tiyj� ,4 ,,, children , the one on the crike is 2 yrs . CyACe and the one on the - .. ' �..�. bike is v yrs. old . � both of these children �"` - •... .-;•.:..'' ;;s.t.+�r•�-;;;,:... ..'".•"�� have been allowed to r� .. .�•�, • •�`_� t .� �,.. s3 �Y ��i� plat• in the street f; .. ••�.�,�,,�r •�i,-�,��.�"' c�'ry.;.�;�y•�,�-�� r"'��t.yYw„�K,.�,f1H f�"�"�stir•T tt� {yr • I(,t� "q� •� Una' L e n d e d since -f •►•:!•.►r•;>, ��� +^",t n . � �- 1•'r r .Ft"{�3i; +{, they oth were toddle. , . ♦♦y� � l Due.; narental t :. ,... :t ti,. „ .% v. ,.♦✓ y �:•; is :et:ol. 't•�- �„ Z •„ ., s• ,N� 'r ! c+ , these e. �•�l��� r J ,t'}• • ,1.�;_ '�'..,.r `.4�'tl%-�,a��� �t�~71�.�4T.�•,�.� ' JUIl`y{� 1~� J �'e :"iul •`~�T.r• '' :- {'�-'••'• C•.q,' �.t..•b i'�7��4 .ii. *r'^�; :. .�•-Ilr'rZ+;: N,J �7• ?ram _ r4.i ( .� � '{' � ;:•- ,,,.(� ar .• ,:.k -�?S ,frc- ¢'�-r,� �K •�_�1w •r 'Rtt 1�' _ r,�J1, i�.� r,+�. •. tom'; �` ;Yr. :�'« '�jy-rl 1J ••11.f' w ,^ pK t �• j` 't,.�:ti�{,���-�!/'i�y�. • . ww• �')T � `�t R•=i' y�I�,S,}1�i; , ` �r�1•,���,ix�,..�,.�7,•fir ,,; (y,i C . './�r.:'t ,,t'fytit``N.?'ti �.,''i f l ,..elf+'sts±. , ' +,'7'j` ,r�lr� T��•,�..t� ty✓i 3„y;7'' `yt1.�. �.��y,J,�l.�1s.,�.. �'�. .•t s� V, � y r .r� :- + rvi E � J r N^r��V`,��1�./ �,,t.,,��__.�.....b.-\�. r ^S♦•,../?. : r.~;tiJt.d.r ^r ..,.•.,�r.,•�lrr�f/t•'.,• i t.�n .r r*'!e' ' VT•o . .. h�ane _� .Z! :y• � .�^� = "^). 1� C �4y i!•ri7 .. ll t-, ♦ :�� ra,L�.• t '1.;,, . j. .tip�� r+ ' ��`•�i' r`-. ,•+4yC ya 11 � ►�.Z•.L •� •�. 7 Ll l�r Li._ y ; +ti,.,,'.r.��.�a ••%.+�y� , ,. 7 •� ••i��r=�11�'�i!f�•'�1i �� s a; _-i, and t o �aC�S•�t"�,'�+�: ::11,. _ f..�..»�aJJ�3i...[..r,4...1.1,•w�..�ir:�il�'•�rll :u�' ` y, _ r y� J`r!.•T•.r-a-.•1Yy 7-'++t.`.'.'.J t�+�!li�wrp.,� * .may r.•:1..-'..l.,a•.% `L�...�-+t�a.++•�.�.�.y_.`.on M A(rei � in -r- ;%. t.J I G 1. J 1,j�c�'.. v �/`y.�I,mo•;..:7,; - +1�ii1•`!��'ivr.i•M.�:,• .•!.. _. �•'�.►i.4�..•iw�.. �_.a.� are cars Gam.n U ••••�''r�'rtr•'�• .r. • �w•M:'C.•�•��=;�.��... ,.h7t• �^i'•�'•: ,`j:. ,?'.fi:j� r" ►+�• _ •,r1 �,'a I•.�•-r1I1�M .f ` .. �...•+`«.• mow\/ � - • r!.�'. ` M,V, Mir are not �)xr1tr:•2'Cllii:(js . �'� %s;'sr.'.••;._ ;:. ,�:..:5 Y., • 7'+;.. .•.►: ,t.i• �, ('� ;•. ' •' - .r.-r..� ! v • •rr 1►�'1-�`j •r+ •..�••,d,•`v�r.••.•.�"l�'r.l.;r�Ju r~4.1 f �.' r �y rMr r -��+ ►.^.'y'`"`i„` ' Cr"l i-.y`� ,• r)L�^'' "�ir�• •1. ;1:'.�.n:+ ►w 1• I..i ,.y M .r Z. �'.r . . J_ljls ,.�.•N' .. r• •"':f./i..t�•- � ;�^"-.r{r.+. i •j1,'!�'*;':t .7 '7 '•^w ..• L'•I:,rr.�•��; ♦ f r! i ._. ,ti...�.Or N��',rt,;,r =•_i_. i}J1.•'.•L.sr .j , .L:T�, �.t••.1•-.+�r;�L~a�7�/ ►w=!. .I .r :• �"' r l .+' •��`-�ar�i'�:''K.I.'•1•�_".,�'`�`i i •SM.4.�11rJ'tj.y'J,•_a�, .w1�: .�•..c�.. r..•a... I t 'i J 7r . �..•. ':..:i.•+•••1\ll.-Srva 'S•• �- w'�„ v Y,r�1C'1�•.•r1.' , v !.••. �.�` r • • ♦ .• „y,.t ,♦`�irk�.♦gip �..<,ffi.r,4,,, rf ,.1 ✓ � � r•. �. 4,' • .1 r �..��"�1'••t: ,� r • ?��► r .t1r•f �•y►..:.w» � .i-. {p..,�� Y• .}�.,t�/•. ptv c t• _- •��. •._ _ _ _� a ••t1af9 t.•.r�...�,r.- ti �����,.•• ..�[ �,,,i.•... �r•a I r `J� �•r•,• r .'tr.., �� �' •J- • ..►• tom"" .:'��. • .r..�••". ` ', [� •. L•i �w -••.+fir-, �. ` : t• r7�At��,j�ar1`'►1 +'jj�ryy•j.�i:►4t.•-1'�Y.,�.i`lti � ��:��; 11 y' ` •'' 1 ,kb'rf'-l• • Fes..�, 7�^'•{r,t 'j.•if f L•��••..Tt�����•C}.'` >� v".T,4y/•f L�'• .�' ,a.,� .v.Jti,,� `,i~L w�.� '�J`�'X�" y -ic`,�, t,Tti �'�.��•+�.•'4sT5r�' '����z`U't""�' •� � _� ♦ 't1..•r � �` :mot �* �����• {♦ .� I "�•'"'�•".� •,,��;yy "-•�: wg'� '1r�•;,'F. -�. . va'tV`1','�s��r�_ ih� 3.^`'�;,Err_7rrrS ,' , 1�'•'( .+r 7 ��!i�„/�s�T;?•+C3y:"'`,. .. ;•��?!- `� .J•1IA . �. . �ztf(1't`v'ry ,' •: .tr•�•.►}: •�+ 7t'�' t1 l• +'.�' � r1 T. s ;t :�+ qr is'r ` t 1, 'S r•;t r•:�•'r.T�•/I�.►;"�t�' J •.J i >vi 40 .-••'--111a �.. ,� . 'a..�.,,t {{{����' r~ r` �-`r�,► rrt rr..1.'�'"�,1'. .��,,}� +�rr�_.���...�, 0:•3 l i•,fyi aI •J K '�y�J= t -;fr'S� �••j.�• w�1.1_M I t♦•" �� .t,. T f... ✓ i R{W �,►�w�,=._r'`=�y�a.��__ ►�.�f �1� t r•C �(�},• 'l . 1 . ! ,� _._s. s •Sp�'syI 7/[�''! ;.f! 1,�}' ; '.1' 4 •j�. % •;.i.A/�1 ` -iirzA. �.s �r. ,•� Sl..i`•� ���(./„�,'"!;1{*l: ►�� 4. r.•O� • ti ���' _•.__..-� _.'�._._ ._.... -,._ _ °;stir-� + ~�• •. .ch., CT , . � .�. - ... �C� may, ,,,, .. •r; ,� �'.`YLJ/ \r•r i Wpm mMMMM • ... - �J ♦• .• �! ' t �CY��t�V.�rt tf�- i. • �• �, �,, 1F'�. '�►er�r '�,.j� • �� � � {. •� t t fr ti ,/'�' ►.r��i�:v •T�:l�rt' 'rC•tt,w�y,,�'4�I►r �.�„� , • ``�y. 'i !t� l�� :�', �'` •1. 'i ��•>r� jh•<.t`�,}��!`r!'<'. lr�tttiryy,�X"t.� �.�"+f��''�r�d'y1•=1.��,rj� •i S^ �;Jt��t•t r.*!�• • , ` r.� .11� :rr,ry.� i �rj;i:� , `}�`/�' ••�; i � CM 'Iw ?::�►'► � .,i .i1.i-�t:t�bA7-• t•-+ctti ;J�('!��. � ... j a�.,1� . �s i *CrN 'u'�fef• + .I ^�. •�'.� �•`� Itj.7"' �` r.. aa1 �.,• �. 1 � 1r � t ` �!Z.<I1�.. r r, � ,�j'► f `^• 'i r' `;ft . :•)_ .-:.•1 sl.�"!��• � - { :�..y•l�,�.�s,.:�L. +r ' in:.1).i3:iC" c/..,72' 1�.. '.1f�:� - - 1 ►f :�• ^1,!��"• �''yl.fv,.:fjt ,r �IF7.��-~iti••r�t��ra-V�.^h '�.Y�l.�itt.�.ar�lj� �.��,�, •.�wi• � ~ ��„ C�.�{.>��_�1!.'.��� .rt ►r(�f 'Yi�+„'�.t �L'.,•,��•iS=),l•�t� y.'_,.i�� ••jk,.f"'��•�S � 1 ..•!� L.. n \ +=*i" t�►T���`+1'+r:U� •-•_f'y'i•�;`+• .1�'✓.' 1;1' 't..�g3�['yt.,_L,�'.►"'lu+�','•-'�' �•'u. Mr�i '` �. v v �• j a• 1 t'<f. a.t.'�}i'�<:x. •1�S r 'Tlwl' r� 1 .f•' r':*' � ________ ✓.;i L� :. +£�tr:. st '!yyx�•� ah,+ a L 7 ' ,�•1�fu �~z''•`q� ? � d 1 ~� =,f`I�:Y1r 'a�:`•`y" �jy'1► •ti if` 't " r.; $;rf r Ill vt. Y.i� :t, _•�" �:•�'w'2Ls.'_+.i�f• J�..�w.i�:.r�1-�•C'.�•ir�`���'S�`!r_•��;±!'C.�..,�:_� - ", �.��: ......�... - '•• r ,,. • .i..•rr-;,.�:�� ` Ar"`I•w t•r L+y+.` 't.i:.+t ai-r+'r!�!11. I'll-4 ' �Ts►`--" a. r.a'_ .:r•r a"I-� ,7:'�.' .�. .� ::a� �t :.'� •ili b - ate •'<.. .•r.t,:.F:L1.'�rr �,�..... .7.i eT r •,,Q -7' <�i.J ,1 . e'`C•'�' .r.. lL!f •'► :�'R�� !^��••f!t ► r •.� :.••�r►r..�►r �...♦ ♦ :lH ♦fr��ra�� 7 ��, �i •".•='� /L J �S�..r1i�MI '•�tti'1•�i� r� ' 1. ! ♦. I :,�.`••�' .:��!"'•'� •� ,rr♦t '��•rra• .i.+�.r,��,y�y E�I r �,'^''•, l�.'j�^?,p���r�,r.:�•••n ���'�" r'Sr --tt�.t+� .. •,<;Lrr ...'u =, -,,,,,-- 1"f- •�r•-f•;t' .�^� 1•- �i'�- yr f:�'-~;�V;...s ti,►\'Y/•+' �NS '�. 1;:•; r r j=:.�7+� f♦:+-1..•.,♦r r! J' �� b •.� •yr,�..•,,,,•!'� ,1,i'r:•rr t-.k �'b►�� �+. •, ,•.. ww.Y;•�i�i;ti..j'S.•X•f► •:���1 �s.i Z!''= 4 t,:li�' '+.-1'i ��' �1�Y.r.��w •� .. �►•f:..M �. -.:•`•,,».�-•�,•f,�-1; J` y �"�''��jI";. . t •!iL��. ���aI'•'.,"��.0 1 �r'���r. -'"t y`. "r ,y .', .�:F•«`•..,=:1,1•{�.f-wr�.,..1 ..♦.�y`il'. • , �, iY �4 •�.'J(s•„�,,-1 •;�.; '• f. 3 l • r . r.V•'•+'':��e�'� :^,,,.tr t z..it�!:�•'4+y r.�. a.•.::�t f.1,.•�_-.T� �t�•r. .�y.�� ' •.>r_Y."' ..�•.-, u7-i' ..� ,Y •rw�.�r•♦� �•I•a, .r.t.'�r1l�t�-� ,�� �ti' r - :. i Jr r .7 r!Tr•C� rj�"l.^f��j� yam.��i."'�"w.y ..L�..1+`r�_f•••�•�•K"r � nry,l rre: ,_.•.•z�C.��"�.=, r e 1 i,,�.�!r M+...,i''!'•r--�` t� `YI'•,�,,•��,�J•+ 1 .�.' Z:.r.r^ •: ':�(: .ice rl"►;s,w• ...af�„Y. . ,?'a •A ++ - • • •• r,, � ,�.,�.:Kam•,..A`,�y'M••w•-�.••_♦�• -�.]7�_� �•fJ!}• wrr `J. •.••,,ram-Olda•••r'••• • •TCRf room • !•, 'T'�<T•r •.�w�,��fal' iu..aN i/t V+ I r�Mj�� y .y1 i�j .f •♦�,�rryn /r1 S1W9.'Si��rjr, ��.'� .3� lam' 1 .. Tt�_ �Y��ft�,..•1.a�'Ya �i i `• •• •;, "• ' l 7`��•1 iry yt♦j *' r� 1��i�'t�� ..y�}�I '.tti• `.�� r _ ter,', •• .I`1•r�'i• '�, 7 rr rt •Sr .'r.. r� f.. � r.j►ri,r• y,•� t• :�' t' •. ,: . •.t•r'ry�.'!�•Y Y�!r '1r w'7�_.�Yr� +���:5 • � .rtk t' ��' �. +••►ib „ ��•• ^.. r'• .••tom r r�r "t t ►�. ���„��•�((�t� �1��,�"'��' •�'._�� ft7 ��r�'•.>ti�s•' :,�fi �•�' : � ' .. r.. - MZI F�.•jl4b'r, ,L.�. ?•• A_j�i•���:. .,-i' 3•." ♦ •�., 'j t" ^.'.�..r-w+�rrr•m• ., t.tr 4...�t L� lt•a7R.'S:CiS\r`�c"`G••' tit'++��a� �Ti•J�itS, 4 �' ;: '' -.w�•�c•'ti'7'rt;t�' 3' • ♦, f:;`f ��.V.i ��•7',' r '. S�+-C'� � fit.• � 1•• � Y�• ••,• y ••�I.•• �..�� t ' �:.,+ K � Ly: x 3 I r 53.- Z1 r r••l�7, ~•.y ♦•#.•v 4s`��.' �'cf µ (•,l-7.i, 'l•1 f•+„� 4 1 . .•rr �M �•: ►t.y 'w. : ,]1`'r+i f rwt 4t'1.1.•<.�:Zl�t `� '�•.�i�•S'�V:�'!`-,:r.-1 a'l�.' 414 •��� f �'-'._--, ___..._ r 1 '+ � �_ fa'� Y -�-. •wt rttiiW�r►NyY`I�^I:r•r►�„i`,Y..>�,r .$,,r +Cf7t..t�� •; ►; i \l r '., _ i 'f r� i; .w. „�r� r����w..�`► s(t ,..1»i ► �,R �t�T• • •r t � `�-++.�.- •t f 1# � '' "r •� r ! C`4� f ♦1ti!•TtrC+.Y��r .ra• .. 1 r �'J _ ► f:ru .. r .'•�]tl ! tti�kts'r�...�1�'�1 �ii:y► �.�i:',.. ��.-i ,~�t�~r•4.� �� + !� �.�•�."S�•r~t_J _"''��'�••�!tt'i+lt'�'••.M���jii1•T� �:r ..r.•t... r •. .♦ �:. `..''L • i`t r!� r�•� N � .'_. ��.!:j�...`r�'•�►�Js•f'\ ..'• ��-a�•T t L,•y ••,� • •.., v � ,::�`•' '�/1'1� � 'Ir'A r•i'r�strM•jJi r�r Ord.. �4•...� • 1 ' r► •-.. 7 .... .+. .-•:.tire• •:t/', ••{:Kfr+� �rr•►tJ h .✓,. � 'r,r e.r •.Li•.'• t, :t-'S.�y�,.•r.•�•„•ytt.,�j.li't'.,�v 11:t:.•'Y�:.ryr•H•r s•+•;. f� ralt�;!s�1�.s�"�1`•1'i•L ! V-••'s:.�•,'•�.ilv�f••jjw�c ,.r� is y:..�.7�s .r ! ' l�:fl 1�'.•, �..��f1"� r/;.:�,e 7ti'%u• I�'��Lh CT;���,•�1 .I. i�!:•1Rr...?,�,1. ., .%I .t•J :rnl'♦V•• r►,t lx=^I f^,♦.-,l.t iv v`t•�l: r,f ► � r r • l ,�. .. - i 1- .� •' 1. a : �••t„��-yrr<':h--*.. .%•ITT y,�'� • •. :... 3•t'y`;-,f.'� • r•. ♦^.... r, .'- r ♦ ,r • :'f .�r:1�.rhrT .c .r )tr,.Y � 1 •r :yyr�.. <. saw- Alp � - `•r��i. i..r.;;,,f��••h fs tt�q�7S'•!��t� -�. J.•Y "�.e'� ��.�' • 3F�r-., 7 �ttii�IZ41;: ►tn'• ! {�'� t !< iti'ij �, 1♦.w •/ra•+•.• • :J+i? '_-+ � ra �• i♦, �}� ayV I �` .1 �!►�'.tt1• �r.r�•� • .r,r . �♦t� �r.'S�`�•7�iVr ,� �\�`Y�+;rT tip'`-�4'•,�t :. 'J.=`�:'�" '�'� 1 �4�`d, .jf• � i'.� kr'l _. + � • '•Y.JM<�!�f��t fi.h;......�`��►,.'� - :;1.` �r�'T.c•�•� �a'tArFl� �i: 1 " t: -i':,,,�•„'. s;�, t p r .. : . .. �� tlNi�� L � .'!•f 1 :t� •`i� t:� f.��'y't"�3• )' �`/ .. !r •. V +rr,C.T',Tr, ►. yK •I' L i� lot'. J e t�� �-a •f ; Pt , �•e\•� � i. •♦ l � ♦^ r.+�.�. .J 1��<•„'•�•r. _�. Z•.♦„rt•►a ysl<�► �., rr-•► ►1 f' Ji�►iC A�. •I�IJ•.A •.. v a .l.GS C j�7 a !'� T ,. •'.►.�'.- • �„ '•+r ..� '' , ,,,r,-.� r �•'r•..�•••r�) �. I T t •�r �'_ Ft`.`�,�. �ti,j :��. � • ♦� 7'�►.•��'�`• . r- r„, �♦yam✓_' �(1 It J .• Da _.► ,• t. •f-t.rtt:ct v t`:y �' +, �•'• :..����--r �� �1��:�f �Y'Oliiifv .::ice}�•,,L�•,,.-.2+.• ., ,- "•' 4.•• � .. w ctE = Bowyer letter of June 16 , 1986 , I. Three home business a. I 'm not aware of the other two businesses and I'm home f all day, every week day, b. "If" there are two others , are they licensed through the City ? f If so , then it seems as though I'm being discriminated - 2. a. tby 'day *care children are: infants th:-ough four years of age,. b. My day care children create less noise than unattended neighborhood children. c . My day care children ' s activities are scheduled and controlled so they do not create problems for neighbors. Repeated protests from the neighbors s a. I've had no protests from any neighbors Except those of i Prs . Brusewitz, who claims she hears "ehildrens voices" . 'P 4 , A safe play environment for our children:. A F► yj.�j c a. I' ve watched neighborhood children from toddles size playing, unsupervised in our public street. 'This is concidered neglect on the part of their parents . b. A public street is not a play ground . There are yards to play in as well as several parks close by. c . Parents of the neicl.borhood children should instruct their i children on street safet•,y and not give them the false security of a cul -de sac. rs. Leonard submifi.ted petitions from Mast ,year and is trying to present there as new. a.. This (attached) petition was submitted for evaluation . ,�• ,» i sari :.arch 193 , t�•rnt --:sue times �Sf� b. The pe i �zon is clearly dated " Ponched c . There was no int`n t to represent it :as a new petition. 6. Both Vr 3 �•.rs Bowyer hold outside jobs, they are not home all the time , ever;► week-day . It seems odd that they are having a daily problem coppina with our street in gren�era•1 A ne r petition signed by 'our, neiijibors stating no trafi'ic profilers. 3 t el try s Rebu Barbara` I:;^onard tauNw TON BEACH .+ ' DEVELOP 1ENY`SERVICES -15-66 JUN �t � ttr. and Mrs. Jack Bowyer 17221 ArGo Circle ; Dear Sirs: P.D. box 190 tfuntington Beach, CA 92667 on, C 92648 Hunting! h, A 'We are Writing this letter in opposition to a petition filed by Hrs. Barbara Leonard, Who resides at 17242 Argo Circle, to open a daycare center to 12 children. • We object to this petition on the grounds that existing conditions in the neighborhood are such that adding additional day care children, Whether it be in two shifts or a one day shift basis, would cause intolerable stress to an already overstressed situation. At resent we have p home businesses operatin on our street, one of Which belon sto 'Mrs�-te`onna'ric-` ."Tf,Z o `Fe are at anothe•- address and - B bring 5 to 10 additional vehicles to our street each day as Wel). as several trips by UPS delivery, trucks and occasionally a semi-truck and trailer. rn addition to this traffic we have the usual resident traffic i and Mrs. Leonard's day care traffic. There are only 13 homes on our street With approximately 28 resident owned vehicles. r There are 19 small children and teenagers living here, not including the day care children. We are also blessed with a practicing rock and roll band and 12 to v'of the usual dogs and cats that populate a neighborhood, all adding to ehcnoise and co;sfusion. We are not doubting that Mrs. Leonard's heart is in the right place as she assured us last year she was not doing this for the money but rather f her love of children. i?e do feel , however, that she has ignored . zepeated protests from the neighbors to increase the number of children ' in er ome, asking to extend ourselves even further by allowing more i . traffic through the cul de sac each day. ' When we purchased our home 15 years ago, we paid more money for the advantage of living on a quiet cul de sac. we now feel that with increased traffic from these busineazes and an increase in Mrs. Leonard's business that our rxW sty values are in jeopardy, our peace and quiet is threatened and safe play environment for our children is lost. We also feel that it is an insult and a burden to have to, pursue this battl ' each year with new letters and more trips to the Council Mecting.s. We have no intention of changing our stand on this is$Le and would like toseer the f Eeriod of time for on the part. of Mrs. Leonard extendinr;' to E` several years rather ' each, yrar as it is now. ?he cor:stant letter writing, c threats and petitions on the part of Mrs . Leonard are annoyinge 1t has also come to our; at n'.,in that Mrs. Leonard has .submitted to ttsr { +�Cauncil petitions that arc copies from last yea�nd is 'tryiiig._.po-present '- f them as new,: pTritions. "Many a the peop a who signed her petition last ' year n'o .longer live in 'this neighborhood. Sincerely, Boy Mr, and 'Mrs.,'Jac k yer PE'I'�L'ICzI IN FAVOR Or MeF RA 1wCNARD' S CHILD DAY 110 k,. } • ate , , the undersigned , as neighbors and parents^of children who are in need of .a licensed Day Care Homet do support- •Earba:�a Leonard in her care of tvod•!ers and infants. We ask t-he%appz,•opriate legislative body of the "City 'Counsol" to approve her Conditional" Use Pe,-:nit. r AJOR'SS S UR H. 1-1 z-1 Z A Q ,�r 3.----3 -f� �s ! z 3 Z A o �-,�ez,C-` �Ou � e�.v, �'•.' ... �•,,, loq 3 Sj z 10 ' -- .� L�:.�-sL� s� �Q�M�� jar ��''�.,�-�c,•� 11�-3-cl-�5 � 'I� ?.2 tJ Gti^ cam- •- ° �-- 00 01 ' s i00-0 � �.- .._ 2C .S —1 1145 7 4�"' 'G v /�" • s e 7r '� t/Y1 �H �/ , 21 2� ' . .4; .: to . ,;N y S k.':.4 i '•-' - . . .,_..... . . r. ---_•-- _• -- - .. , .a , Regain letter dated Jun-e 15, 198" 1 . Not allowing Conditional use pArnits-nei ghborhood disease. a. Are the "Center" Photos submitted zoned RI ? Are their in the the City of liuntinpton Reach? ExactLf ly where are they located? ' 2. Prude in our _homes. a . , Large family day care homes that are part of the ;neighborhood care just as much as do other residents about keeping the neigh borhood attractive . - 3. Zoning and deteriation of property values. a. Conditional Use Perri is for a largefamily day care home is a confoLming use in a residential none. b. Loss of property values is pure speculation , not a proven fact. " c . Often day care provided in a neighborhood is seen by homebuyers as an asset to a neighborhood , as most mothers work outside the hone . 1f . Photographs of dam care centers including the existing one in our neighborhood . a , ^he photos submitted , except for the one in our neighborhood, are just that , cen ters . Whey are no Large FamAly Day Care Homes in our city. Although ra.ny pecple don' t realize it, child care programs core in two formns---fa;-.1ily day care homes and child care centers. ',then people hear the term child care , most often they immediately think of a large center. b . Centers a:e usually 20 or more children and are located in buildings designed as child care institutions. Family day core homes are l.erall-v renuired to be located in homes where the provider lives. :vvelve is the mn.—.i.munt c;,pacity for family day care homes. C. The ph.oto of the da,. care home in our neighborhood shows the addition has beer do::e by a professional . It is nice 1.0r) 1.01., �ariich _J 11 increase property values in the neighbc�rrioo'd. �. ` s " ( ' �` 5L1'^..�Zs��,d � s!;7ned w ' . i E� 'tie tii Dior. :,o , e ... - ne..=hbvr. �: res_da its ; { which saLls "no lass Der `1" values" Rc'�;� La byr: tL�L+eliiiiL.. �►"�►rr �Owl HUNTINdiON ' SUCH . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 159 1986 JUN. 61" KA P.D. lox I Huntiniten Reach. CA Planning Commission Huntington -Beach Civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , California Subject : .-CoAditiona2 _Use: Permit No 86=25'- Commission Members : Conditional use permits do break down the integrity of single family residential neighborhoods . One conditional use permit is used as justification for a second or third conditional use permi, and has been used for this purpose in this case . Several conditional use permits are used as justification for -variances and both are used as justification for spot zoning changes . ''My point is that the best way to maintain the integrity of the single family residential neighborhood in this community or any other community is by not allowing conditional use Permits in an established neighborhood. The system becomes a progressive n ghbo"rfiood disease . This is a good neighborhood in which the owners take pride in their homes and are improving and up - grading them on a continuing basis . As a home owner in this community I expect the zoning set by the cit% to be up -held and prevent the eteriation of pro ert•- values . I am enclosing some hoto ra hs of da y - care 'centc� including he existin one in our nei hborhood This home ]-.as an addition with a secondary entry marked) which can be easily converted to a second living unit . Of course , .legally this would have to lie done with city approval but with exterior work completed (with permit) t:ie interior could be changed without anyones knowledge . Sincerely, JaiICs lti Veag - 1:Z51 Argo CirCl e t t-iuntington Reach Cal x f op , 1. y�n`,� �.: 7ti y,, M a..: � ♦� hy� �✓!� , �» ••}� ,' ` \.�• ,P�} I•'I ~ •� .• t.• '�.. ~�, -f,; � `1�� • 4« r= ;l{�� ���,. t�s ice. ,�'��'�� •! , , AM J'E,GcW A16 'Tl�i.t• //V 'S`'J��v2� .�,,r�ror0N$ FaR• �,r^)1�.A1�4 D � -! l eoA/'9� AlAI �60 1� �jCFS T fi .9 L• �C�' F.9r, o. ..� _.._W.. .�. _.__�.. _ _.� �___.._....._... ... SO cig �, v, o7•f!c�' .vim�Q r,��l) � r; C� t .'tGj� C�liLL1 �� e7rq � �a� �ctG Chi/l-•� .�. - . .. _ - . M J _ _ _ . . 77 a A(o N61T E 4 i 4ZL, r//iGD46'ev i .y ,�. 116A 9. .�-`Fr _-.._yo� c.��sH T coy,?�:7 r • ✓_ r-r,w.,.,.,._._..✓.__r...rr.» ..__•,__r,r._. _...,.._._ »._.r_.. .w•.._r..-.. ,.. .y... -.._ .. ..._,..._._.«__ __.. _ r_•ww _. �,. Y C w .•.+w+.�w•r�.r...•-_._...rw_ � ; j 1 r, ,l,` �` t �•�.,�`�,tl ` -, 1. ,. •' '; r '- ', I �n is �p.ww....�a• Y•'_++✓�'- ►.w.:r. .�...+..�w.++f.r�ww�w�-.�.. _. ...,..r,r. ,'� . t r'. . , 1. .� S 1 1 r•..;. ( • .1 i 1 '1 Yr t ''1 x.�l� pcks tjg ... . SCALE _ !N J'LC DR. 0 F E DA Poor. j. I TFI 7tars� t�ili!:TE;iS3_1R`i i'.if:Fi :Gts%v:.} �* i 0 3 -1- - c :� g t-'� C Ex ts'n 96) i 4 iN+ ti v TUCAN1 DR cr • = ' "�_ � BETTY OR CAPSTO E DA. - -E 40 o .—.--.— u i• _ cwc - U u J CF C cr A —J i w z BAKER DR — - � ti ¢ — FORD DP f . Ix — FORD LNV'}jr S -- MANHATTAk � � I JIL TF-1%T M M Z CL N too �- O -- ` Y DR J SLATCA Eup 81 -4 •r _ 1Rw�WG10��M�CiR _.? ' • HUNTINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION ,. s -. C ITY O t- UNTIN Ho �TC�J E�E/ �1 j t n 2CK� MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 926413 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK r a August 18, 1986 Barbara Leonard 17242 Argo Circle Huntington Beach , CA 92647 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach atthe regular meeting held Augupt 4, 1986, deferred the decision on your appeal cf Conditional Use Permit 86-25 to the regular meeting to be held on October C. 1986, at 7:30 P.M. Enclosed are the minutes of the meeting for your information. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:b t Enclosure C� , 5 o s - is i v , .City Council .-: City of iluntington Beach ,- California July ?5 , 1986 Re : Agenda item D-2z City Council meeting July 21 , 1986 %2 Mayor and Council Members : I would like to briefly recap by objections to the proposed day care center by Barbara Leonard. I . F2.1sting dwelling floor area 1 , 704 Sq .Ft. 2 . U . B. C . min , requirement (table 33A) 300 'Sq .;Ft . 3 . 12 children and 2 adults 122 Sq . Ft . 4 . Considering husband and daughter in addition 107 Sq. Ft . S . Both 3 and 4 are less than min. requirement for apartment huildii<<rs and hotels 200 Sq . Ft . 6 . Both 3 and 4 are approaching min . requirement for an office building 100 Sq. Ft. A duelling converted to day care should not be allowed in u "Low Density Residential Zone" . I do not believe it is the intent of "conditional use permits" to convert dwellings to commercial use , but rather a tool to allow the inclusion of day care centers , schools , churches , etc. in residential zones during the planning stage when they can be placed in proper locations . In addition 1 would like to state there are other U . B . C . code violations : 1 . Two fire exits are required for the number of cooupants ., The :Aiding glass door from living area and the garage door do not quality . 2 . The fire separation ~gall between a dwelling and garage does not meet requirements for day care separation . - These Items may seem, like small things , however, they and the sq . it. /occupant requirements are all dealing with life/safety. 4 It ' s hard to believe 2 adults under panic corditions can safely remove 12 infants and todlers from a burning structure . It 's just as hard ' for . one adult to remove 6 under th,^ same ccndtinns . Which brings up the ques -ion of liability. - Liability insurance { W 1 the City of Huntington :'er,ch be assumin the liabi, tant . for day care center; runs from ti �. r y, expensi �e tb: non-exis �at� ct h g a icy by . a��aap'roving thi 5 application . In rase of death oF', injury t:o :one of these children the parents : will be looking; for 'a' meone to prey , y � T: ��..r. -2 :There seems to be , a need ,for `day care centers . However , 11 'i s not the r 'r5 0 day. caregfnc�l ties . thnt pxov decthesehserwices by ocatin S fY ' refront operations '!'he :, t { PP r . . ds and .boil s..:which mee sho in centers . These are not .sto operators ;buys separate pa d fac`ilatie .., all code requirements . If you think"'about it', this ;is .a good convient.. location for - all life the cit can not,-,.require, r. the inclusion ;.of , day care conters 'Y ., .. . Y hOWCVET , ,; It can encourage,.;,,: , j devel.apex_' toplan . for and - approach' these operat"ors.. Many:., ,,.. shopping centers are being buirt and there are empty `pads . available . Thank you for consideration of by 'views 's.:l ames 11. Reagln 7251 Argo Circle Huntington Beak-h, California 92647 ► ` , t, 1 David '$aAd ; I 17221 Taurus Lane Huntington Beach, ' CA 92647 , July 21 , 1986 r. • � �G'�jj Cr��C�e► f n y CouncilHuntingtoBeach it l / ���• Huntington ' Beach Civic Center 2000 'Main Street Huntington Beach., California ' ` Re': Conditidnal Use Permit No. 86r-25' Appeal ' Location: 17242 Argo .Circle - R1 Since I am recovering from ma j"or surgery, . I am unable-to attend this hearing today. Ho waver, my position on tonignt ' s - proposal ' g still �cate oricall o ''� s aced to he apphicant' has not -changed . I am •A request to °operate a Iar"ge family ay care home o , up to 12 children , in an existing family hoop . This is a residential *neighb,orhood no't. � a: business area, and we 'have the right to a reaeonably,,peace ful environment. With 12 small children in one residence there `is ' b ound ' to be a lot of noise. am working often at ni. ht since I have a rotating work ' shift * sh S g �' g � i.ft . Therefore , it is often necessary that I sleep during the day. Z cannot afford to be kept awake by a lot of. noise. Right now, however, f I will need peace and quiet more than ever , since I have a long recovery ahead of me from major surgery. Fiy family and I have been living here since 1971 . We chose to G I live here because we wanted to live in a friendly, nice , A' nd quiet neighborhood .. x . has been that up to now. A child , care . f cil.ity for up to 12 children is a noisy business, and as ' such' should be operated in an area zoned for business . het me ask you, Members of the city Councils would you like to have a day care center of up to 12 small children near your back yard? Sincerely 000* David ;andor a '.000 i EYE OP SERY{CES ► CITItEN3 PETITION TO''.THE ` CITITY OF H�JhlTINGTON 8E ,F JUKE I P 8 6 -�; r,a# sox 190 r r: r f Barbara Leonard s i n th,i s . pe t i t i�oonn I�e�ct�uCA tT64e ,,., We teed ed) 9f cerise to px and her day -care .'center to 12 ch` .11 i nq d n 1 bus ' sa at . 1 �242-'Ar o Circl **- is . in thrrce6ttr ' Thet ? oca .. be , t � onof her pl:ace•�of bu i�ne 9 of a. resi`den:tial nelgt boyhood which is zoned R�-1 and desi nod for sin 1 .� p h we 'obJect to are : familyresidenccs . The specific concerns which 1 . Noise from the children which is di ss1-u t i ve to our househol ds. P 2. Addi t i onal traf f i c in a . cu�l de sac with l imi fed park i ng space . 3. Potential loss of property value%. NAM ADDS,RESS 'l e P + 1S �j,� t. 41 12 1, .LZL5 Set t� f I�W11;.4^vs '��'., a' oL'ris.yew. ...-. ,-. ,. .._ ... .�..�,11 :''1�[i.'. :.+il+i{�«.:'�l.fr�';,,;cc�b?N'Y:Y nfW�Ri+ A,i'!�i{ �I4h`'` .».rr•.:,r .-j:., ,,,. k��;'^M vi+41fG'YtMfIN"`�'."'"� , r yy CITIZENS PETITION T .THE CITY '0F HUNTIN oTON BEACH' JUINE 1986 that 9 s of Barbara Leonard s i Qn th l t, pe.t i t i on request i nq We the nei hbor she 'be. 'den i ed i i ce'nse, to ex nd her day;, ,_ F 1 ocat i on o P. : ea dren'. re cen ter;., tc'� 12 ch of f her i sce, of. bus i ness ' at 17, 42_ , .,. ,,,. , ctn ter, .,. Ti1e residential i a1 ne i 9Nbonc�od, wh i ch- t s ,zoned, R I randCdesi ned .forts farm 1 y rei i dences, The spec i f i c concerns wh'i ch. we object 'to 'ir e,I to Mot se from the ch i i dren wh i ch. i s' disruptive p househdI d . rU to ue to our ' 2 . Addi t iona) traffic in a c u I de' sac with 1 imi tt�d `'parKing space . S. Potential loss of property values . . AbrRESS r 1 � , �: ; r L 7 , Loll, r : P rl i i