Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional use permit 85-26 - Coastal Development permit 85 1 Authorized to Pubbsh Aavwvzommts of w kinds wscWAV puW+c noticot by Decree of the Superior Court -1 Orange County, CAU10/ 1111, Number A-6214, dared 29 SOplernber, 195I, and A-24531. dated I t June, 1963, STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange Vivo" •e.-.»W. te"We. .0%ft 14 pee takox"old" I` am a Citizen of the United Stases and a resident of the County aforesaid,. I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below �Q entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DA!LY PILOT, with ovhich is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation. printed and published in the City of Costa Mesas, County of Orange. State o1 California, and that a Notice of Public Veari.ng of which copy attached hereto is a ttue and complete 1. copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa. ~;t Newport Leach, Huntington. Beach. Fountain Valley. Irvine, the South roast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper for ,y tt w**v t*ltx to wit the issue(s) of tee pwMr. Au-3us t 22 _ 198 5af 198 � twrtle�� tO�a�wlMwtaf•rA�, 19 8 6ptt�tw!'• %�s ; aMbr tea 'ir�d het i p� Y All. � t 98M tom,hpw-': .77 I declare, under panaity of perjury, that the foregoing Is true and correct. " Executed o August 23 19fi •i at Costa Mesa. Cal ornie, Signaturee2, �s .., V, 3. A parcel map shall tie submitted and recorded prior to the inquance of building permits for consolidating the existing 25 foot wide lots 4 . The applicant shall make an offer to acquire the adjacent 50 foot wide lot and integrate It into the motel devel nnmeht . if the applicant is unable to acquire this pa� .Pl , :,a+ le4-ter of offer and rLjection shall be submitted to the ribpartmsnt of Development Se[?iices . a 5 . A deta Lled landscape plan and !Iprinkler plan shall be , submitted in accordance with the Downtown Landscape Guidelines , including the use of extensive berming in the front. setback area along Pacific Coast Highway; and shall be approved by the Development Services and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of buildink permits . 6 . A Rateri.als pallet .indicating final color choices of the building materials and an archetectural deaigi, consistent with the proposed Downtown Specific Plan drchectural guidelines must be submitted for review and approval by the Development Services Lirect-,.'r prior to the issuance. cif building permits. 7. Provisions must be made tc buffer the motel from the ad jaciint oil operation , and are subject to review and approval by tho Fire and Development Services Department . + 3 R . &, automatic sprinkler system approved by the Fire Department shall he installed throughout tihe complex per N. F. P. A . Standard 13. This system must be supervised per Fire Department Standards. g . A wet standpipe system approved by the Fire Department shal.l t be installed in the stairways and is to comply with Uniform building Code Standards . i0. An al.arp, systen approved by the Pir. e Department shall he installed throughout per Uniform Fire Codes Standards . 11 . To accommodate the use of an ambulance gurney, every floor served by. elevatorts shall have access to at least, tine � elevator car having a minimum inside car platform of aix feet , eight inches wide by four feet , three 4,nches-deep with a minimum Blear cppit ng width of forty-two -Isci: Ps . 12. The. water system must' be upgraded to provide a fire 'f low of 31500 GPM . New rite hydrants are to be metalled ,fir, areas approved by ::he Fire riepartment . 13 . The stairway enclosure on the south side must include a corridor on the ground floor leading from the -stairway to the exterior , of the `building,, or the stairway can exit directly s to the South 'side exterior. RCA 9/3/85 � 1 , 1.4 . ^I wo exits sha3 :.' he requi red for the spa/lounge on the roof deck. 15. The '2-1/2 foot of alley ded!cation shall be, p-3ved -jer City ' Standards. The davelo �er shall &lso pave the entire dedicated allev from 8th Street to the northwesterly property line. 16. The curb arfJ gutter along 8th Street shall be ronst-ucted at 29 . 5 feet from the` centerline to accommodate future � perpendicular parking when 8th street is cul-de-s_aced. 170 A 2 foot .ride piolic utilities easement is required behind f t,e sidewalk . 18,.` An 8 inch minimum water main shall. be constructed in 8th l t Street. 1 j 19 . A sewer main shall be constructed in Eth Street Zrom Pacific 'I Coast Highway L:� tine Orange County Sanitation District Sewer 1 Trunk in Walnut Avenue and connected at an approved location . 20. Any abandoned oil wells shall be modified as required by the � Fire Department pr4Lor to the issuance of bullding 'permits . y 21 . Low volume heads shall be t-3%d on all showers. f I 22. All building spoils such as• unusz le „l umber , wire, pipe and surpluL,, or unusable materials shall tie disposed of at an cff-site area equipped to handle them. 23 . Energy-efficient lighting shall be used in open space areas . 24 . A detailed soils analysis shall be pr caged by a registered soils engineer . This analysis shall include on-site sampling sy, and laboratory testing of materials to provide letailed recommendations regarding grading, chemical . and fill properties , foundations , retaining walls , streets and utilities , etc. 25. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke this Conditional Use Permit if any violation of 'these conditions or the Huntington H�: ; : Ordinance Code o^.curs. DISCUSSION: Conditional Use Perri,t. ; No. ,85--26 in conunct:iun f-fith a Special Permit and .Coastal Developm6nt Permit No. 85-11 , is a- request to develop a three-story, 52-unit. mute},, ''which- incluces a manager ' s unit, and, maid I,s.l ¢usxters, en a �A5 ' n:�t acre vacant .site ate,, t6 northwest cor;Ier­of,, ?acifi-c SCaast ,_Htghway', and 8th Street . The Special Permit--request .wds' to'4111ow t:ie '.eRtrroacti�tenG of a `c�ino py ifith supinort columns la 1ect into `t:he ,required` 15 feet , ekteri'o:, side 9 3 -5-� RCA``- � �85 - '' t�129d 1 ` 00 I i yard setback fzn^� 6th Street , for an 18 foot wide drive ramp it) lieu of the required 24 foot width requirement , and for 25 feet 6 inches wide driveway aisles in lieu of the required 27 foot wide requirement . i On duly 21 1985 , the Planning Commission continued Conditional Use j Permit tics . 85-26 and Coastal Development Permit tto . 85-11 to the next meeting because of concernsi regarding site layout and parking: and an adjacent 50 foot wide vacant lot . The Commission requested the applicant to submit revised plans indicating access to the subterranean parking from 8th Street instead of the alley and to provide additional information regarding the feasibility of incorporating an adjacent 50 foot wide lot , which will become isolated and substandard in size if the proposed motel is approved, within the motel development . At the Planning Commission meeting of July 16, 1985 , the Commission reviewed the revised plan and agreed that it was a more efficient site .layout of circulation and structure design. The su;';terranean driveway ramp was widened to 23 feet and a continuous loop system was provided in the subterranean parking area for better circulation . The landscaping area alone Pacific Coast Highway and Sth Street will be intensified to screen the ramp which partially encroaches into the front setback . However , the Commission still had concerns about the abutting 50 foot wide parcel . The applicant indicated that a verbal offer to purchase the parcel was made and rejected. The Commission continued Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 and Coastal Development Permit No . 85-11 to the August 5, 1985 meetinri, directed staff to obtain additional information pertaining to the oil operation on the 50 foot wide lot , and directed the applicant to hake a bonafide written offer to acquire the lot and provide evidence of rejection of the offer . Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 and Coastal. Development Permit No . 85-11 were approved by the Planning Commission on August 5 , 1985 r based on the findings and modified conditions of approval outlined i under the Analysis section of this report . Based on current oil production figures and size of the parcel , a preliminary appraisal of the subject propert by our Real Property Manager indicated that its value ranged f;or., L25 , 000 to $25n, 000 , which included removal of two wells . The applicant had made an offer of t200# 000 t:o purchase the property which was rejected by the property �%',-'ner mainly because the offer was based on the owner financing 801 of the loan. Approval of Conditional. Use Permit No . 85-26 by the Planning Commission was appealed by Robert Orr , Legal Representative for Larry Vasterling who is the owner of the adjacent 50 foot wide parcel . The appe-al is based on the contention that the 52 _uni.t motel development will have a detrimental impact upon the value of Mr. . Vasterling 's property, contrary to Finding No. 1 of the staff report which reads, "The development will not have a detrimental i FCA - 9/3/95 �6 (3129a ) i I 7 Alit r -aa impact upon the value . of the property in the vicinity. " The apppellant has requested that the appeal be heard on September 16 , *' 1985 since he will be out of the office from August 29 through September B . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed motel project is exempt from, environmental review ' because it is in conformance with the Downtown Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 15181 of the California Environmental Quality Act . FUNDING SOURCE: j 11ot applicable. 1 ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1 . Uphold the action of the Planning Commission with findings and ' conditions of approval as approved, 2 . Deny conditional Use Fernit No. 85-26 on the ba,nis of the appeal submitted by Robert Orr with the foliawing findings; for denial . FINDINGS FOR DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT tio. f„ 5-26 : 1 ► The proposed 52 unit motel will have a detrimental effect upon the general health , welfare , safety and convenience of persona residing in the area , and upon the value of the property within the vicinity because it will leave an abutting 50 foot wide lot isolated and substandard in size. 2. The location , site Layout , and design of the proposed three-story motel structure dogs not properly adapt to streets , driveways , and alleys , and uses in a harmonious manner because of the intenvity of use . 3 . Access to and parking for the proposed use could create undue traffic problems . ATTACHMENTS: I 1 . Planning Commission staff report dated August 5, 1985 a 2. Planning Commins3ion minutes dated July 2, July .16r , and August S , 1985 3 . Findings and Conditions of Approval pproval Baked August 61. 1985 4 4 . Letter from appellant dated August 15, 1985 JWP:SMH:kla RCA 9�• / 5 31 CJV OF H- t..AVV V"$CUs KUH1{�:GYQ1tgF1►CNILaL,I . MAT5UK AND C%RR �'� LGOHApD A. WAf3L1►t 1 L►� �� WELLS VARGO tlA010% MUILCING, SUIt!_ 1010 _wC►BC►►� M, OF44 100 OCCANG+IC -- LONC BEACH. CAUIOV.KIA 0ON2 a► CoutisLl 42131 ��?-A'►07 . . CNRISTQOHCR C. 1.+AN1ag i August 13 , 1985 II Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Appeal try City Council of Grant of Conditional Use Permit Nu. 85-26; Project Site: 800 Pacific Coast Highway Dear Ms . Wentworth : +, Please be advised that this office represents Larry R. Vasterling, the owner of the vacant lot on the northwest boundary of the above referenced project site . On August 5 , 1905, the Planning Commission granted the above refer- enced Conditional Use: Permit over the objections of Mr. Vasterling, Accordingly, notice is hereby ci.ven that M;'', Vasterling intends to appeal the decision of the Planning Carunissi.on to the full City Council . The general ground for the appeal is that the propos-,d development of a 52 unit motel upon the project site wV,A have a detrimental impact upon the value of Mr. VastM ling' s property. Specifically, Mr . Vasterling objects to Ttem No. (1) of the Planning Commission Findings in this regard, which stated that the development would not have a detri- mental impact upon the value of the property ;n the vicinity of the project site. A local ordinance requires a minimum par._e2 size for develop- ment with a 100 ' frontage on Pacific Coast Highway. Mr. Vasterling' s property only has a 50 ' frontage on Pacific Coast Highway. A Taco Bell restaurant is situated on the northwest boundary of Mr. Vasterling' s property. Thus, the proposed development would leave Mr. ► asterling with ;an ioo- lated 50 ' wide parcel which he could not develop on 'his owns His only alternative Would be to sell the property , to ono of his existing -neighbors . Unless Mr. Vasterling is q'ranted some relief from the provisions of the ordinance requiring I t { t Ms . Alicia Wentworth August 13, 1985 Page Two a 100 ' frontage on Pacific Coast Highway, the approval of the proposed project will, in effect, result in a "taking" of Mr. Vasterling' s property without just compensation. Therefore, Mr. Vasterling' s appeal is both necessary and appropriate . Kindly please set the matter for a hearing before, the City Council , and advise this office of the date thereof. We would like the opportunity to submit a written brief, to the Council in advance of the hearing date . Please do not set the matter for a hearing between August 29th and September 8th, because I will be out of the office during that time and unable to appear on Mr . Vasterling ' s behalf . i Thank you for your anticipated courtesy and cooperation . I Sincerely yours , HATSUK AND ORR 'F'r'; J By ROBERT M. ORR I RMO:bb cc: Mr. Vasterling .j,ni& CITY OF HUNTING TON 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE of THE CITY CLERK September 4, 1985 Nan Patel 8791 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, CA 92641 On September 3, 1985 the City Council of the City 'of Huntington` Beach denied the appeal filed to the Planning C m ission's approval cf Conditional Use Permit Nu. 85-26 and approved your application,, with findings. Please contact the Development Services Departzent for furt±'er information - 5.6-5271 . Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:bt CC: James Palin, Development Services Director Y ' _i CI Y GAF HUNTIl11G'f ON BEACH 2000 (MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK September 5, 1985 Robert M. Orr, Attorney at Law 100 Oceangate - Wells Farge Bldg. Suite 1010 Long Beach, CA 90802 RE: Appeal filed to Planning Commission Approval of CUP:--,85-•26 The City Council of the City of Huntington Reach at its regular meeting held September 3, 1985, denied the which you filed on behalf of Larry Vasterl ing relative to Co idi tional Use Permit No. 85-26. Please contact the Development Services Devartment if you have any questions - 536-5271 . _ L Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk A11Td:CB:bt CC: James Palin, Development Services Director :Larry Vasterling 437 N. Sappington Glendale, NO 63122 , It ! • • t' .. trlR�'�'�Nfli �JIR/I ) !l i X7046 VELOW rQR r1UN0 PTAMP Q:d:Y► 1tAW OMCCS /;. t ° ` MAYSUKK & ORR ti. WCUS PAX40 MAtix ■uItWAG, IFUNN 1010 a 2 100 ce"MaAT[ *' LONG X&ACH. CALImptMIA 90803 IZI�) Aax•3k07 _ f�l�lYE9 4 +: 5 attorneys for LARRY R. VASTERLING , ,� �� Appellant •,. �� ,j,r , .� 6 7 8 F CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF IIUIIITINGTO14 BEACH, CkLIFOP1;rA , 10 11 �� t• IN RE APPEAL OF: j APPELLANT' S DRIV IN SUPPORT 12 j OF APPEAL LARRY R. VASTERLING 13 (Conditional Use Permit ) tao. 85-•26,'project: site: j 14 800 Pacific Coast Highway) ) 15 -- ) 16 1 ) I tr'T ROnUCT Iors 18 This inatt:er is before the City Council as an appeal from the I 19 August- 5 , 1985 decision of t ho Pl.a,-inir.5 Commission to chant Corr 20 d.itiotla,l Use Premit No. 8L -26 t+ermi t_ting the development: of. a 21. 52 unit motel at 800 Pacific Coast Highway, Huntington Beach, (; 22 California. `'i'he Appellant , 1.4%RRY R . VASTERLING , is the owner 23 of the vacant: lot on the northwest boundary of the project s'it(,&. . 24, This appeal. has been filed because of tihe se`eraly adverse impact, f 25 that the deve lopmcnt will have upon Mr. Vas tort a ng ' t� abi J,i ty to 26 develop or improve his own property. 27 S1 ' f 28 • . 1 STATEMENT OF 7 HE CASE 3 The Appellant' s lot has 50 feet of frontage on Pacific Coast: , y, Highway. The project site borders one side of Appell.ant' s lot , and a Taco Bell restaurant borders the other sine of Appellant' s 6 lot. Both the project sit , and Appellant' s lot are located 7 within the area designated ae District 1 in the Specific Plan for 8 the City of Huntington Beach . 9 Section 4 . 3 . 02 of the Specific P3an provides that the 10 minimum parcel s•:ce for development in District 1. is 100 feet OF 11 frontage on Pacific Coast Vi.gh.way. By permitting the propot4d 12 development , the City would in affect be forcing the Appellant: 13 to either sell his lot to once cif the ;adjoining owners or resort i 14 to leaving it vacant and undeveloped for an indefinite period 15 of time. Because Appellant' s .lot has less than 100 feet Of lie frontage on Pacific Coast Highway, Appellant mould effectively 17 be prevented from dcvelcping the lot on his own . Farther of these 1{1 results would severely affect the r,:arketabil.ity and the value of 19 Appellant ' s property. 20 For the foregoing reasons, the proposed development would . 21 have a detrimental impact on the value, of Appellant' s property . 22 Section 4 . 1.. 02 of the Specific Plan specifies that a special + a` 23" ' permit , such as was granted by the Planning Commission herein , i 2$ may not be granted unless , among other things,. the ,proposed , J 25 development will not be detrimental or injurious to the value, 26- of the property in the neirlIhborhCod. Thus, a+cc'ord ing ',tn -Section 27 4 . 1. 02 , they Planning Commission was in error to have granted . the 26 . .Conditional Use Pernit f'or: develo ment of the rd ect~ S.i.te. pit i, taw nn,Gt� P p. 1 MAlfVR a G1111 ' IiKLJ.� Iw�IIK K6MK y NY1lW1,A.,tWYf 1!!K MA �Fl r r �ii;�t+,,nau caws . �' �R�.s'4oa.0"1 AM CONCLUSION z; 3 Because the proposed development wou lC have a detrimental 4 impact on the marketability and value of Appellant' s property, � 5 a Conditional Use Perry;.. may not legally be granted. To bring � the City into compliance with the law, the City Council .must ? rescind the granting of the permit. A The detrimental imract of the developap-nt on Appellant' s' 9 property could be eliminated if Appellant; is granted a variance 10 from the 103 foot frontaq ! • requirement of section 4 . 3 .02. As 11 an alternative to rescinding tre granting of the permit, the 12 matter could instead be referred back to the Panning Commission 13 with instructions to receive r_nrl approve an application from 14 Appellant for such a variance , r 15 16 DATED: Respectfully submitted , :r i 17 MAT5UK AIND ORR 18 • ' 19 by ROBERT M . ORR ' i 20 r 21 22 23 ; ' 24 `i ' 26 : 2?, Jj {` i MATSUK A 011R 1 ly1S.LK rA1N10 •AMK 1 ,', fwumtto. wRu Aot* rra n —3— r. ptnc�. ;, •: '. • , , , . , '`.III 'cALrra�r•w► rofrr � ".Q U A•i FOR CITY COUNCt ACTS. N , Date SeEtember 3r 19R5 Subrnittedto: ''Hanorab), e Mayor' and City Council Submitted by. • Charles W. Thompson, C1ty Administrator �•W Prepared by: James F:,M Pal in, Director , Development, Services � ,, • Sublva APPEAL OF THE PLANNING Commrssioti'S APPROVAL nP C0ND3Tr0NAL , U i;t 'PERM1T NO. 85-26 Consistent with Council Policy? Yes ( l New PU' licy or Exception Statement,of Issue, Recommendation.Amnlysis, Fu.neing Source, Altemative Actions, Attachments: i i E STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 1 The Planning Commission ' s approval of Conditional Use Permit tits, t 85-26 for a 52-unit mc�Lel . with a special permit request for encroachment of a canopy 10 feet into the required 15 Foot exterior side -yard setback and For a redu'Cljon in drive aisle widths located at . 800 Pacific Coast Highway has been - appealed for the City council ' s consideration. RECOMMENDATION Continue the appeal of the Planning Commission 's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 to the September 1E , 1985 City Council meeting Fer the appellant, 's request. ANAMIS: APPLICANT: Nan Patel 3791 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, California 92641 APPELLANT: Robert M. Orr 100 Oceangate Long Beach , ,California ( Legal Representative for Larry Vasterling) LOCATION: 800 Pacific Coast Highway 9 Y ; (northwest "-�:arner. of PCH and 8th ' Street ) `YREGiIEST: � To permit conttr•ection of uost foraen2roazhrtce�teofWa tcano ; - . ' special perm. q canopy 10 feet into -.the required 15 1ot : erior side yard setback an f in'-drive aisle widths: r; t10 is 04 ; Flanninq Commission action On AdoUst 5 , 1985: ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER ,AUL) SECOND BY WINCH£LL, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NC. 85--26 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 65-11 WAS , APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND HODIPIED CONDI TONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: a AYES: Rowe, Winchell , Schumacher , Livengood, Porter ; NOES: None ASSENT: Erskine, Mir;ahangir :ABSTAIN: Nona FINDINGS FOR SPECIAL PE1Z::1'T ITEMS 1 hnU =2 1 . The encroachment of the single ,story, unencloRed canopy up to 5 feet of the exteri�.-r ride property line is unobtrusive and enhances the main entrance of the building. i 2 . A re(ANction of the drive aisle widths from 27 feet to 25 feet-6 inches is acceptable since it peo-ains to the subterranean parking structure which is used for valet parking only. j 3. The proposed deviations will not be detrimental to. the general health , welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood or City in general , nor injurious to the value of adjacent properties, 4 . The project is consistent with objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan in achieving a development adapted to the natural land features and compatible with the surrounding environment . FINDINGS FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-11 : 1 . The proposed 52--unit motel is consistent with the City 's Coastal zone suffix and the Downtown Specific Plan District 1 standards , except as provided for in the Special . Permit ' request , as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property; and conforms with the plans, policies , requirements and standards of the CityOs Coasta: Land Use Plan. 2 . The, proposed development conforms with the public access - and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . Adequate public: access, Co the beach is provided on Sth . Street and Pacific Coast Highway; and building layout and design optimizes views to the ocean . 'T , ucture3. er . r in ;_ mannet that. is cons stent,."with :the Coastal' Land ,Use Plan. ; `;r" g" wet and ;,water utilltieB ; in,`8th xisting ;ander round. se Stree t : a ',png with ' the r; rqui,red -�improvenents as described ; in the k.nnditions of approval are' adequate to sQrve the . proposed ` development. "y ,` RCA M , 9/3/85 .-2- (3,129d) FINDINGS FCR CONDITIO?SAL USE PERMIT NO. 05-IG: i . The 52 unit motel wi.11 not have a dot 'r�. n ine tat effect proposed uppn `;:, general health , welfare, safet,l and ; convenience of persons residing in the area , nor upon the vai lue of the � property within the vicinity. 2. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses, :' :r.e vicinity. 3 . The proposed development is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan . 4 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of use at the time the Downtown Specific Flan zoining designation was plaed on the subject property. 5. The location , site layout , and design of the propo:l9ed motel use does properly adapt the proposed three-story not:el structure to streets , drivewaya , alleys '.. and uses ir a harmonious manner . 6 . Access to and parking for the proposed use will not; create undue traffic problems if designed as prescribed in this attached conditions of approval . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-26 : 1 . The site plan dated July 11 , 1985 , and floor plans and elevations dated June 61 1985 shall he revised and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director reflecting the following modification;: a . The drive approaches on 8th Street: shall conform to Public Works standards . b. The driveway ramp to the subject parking shall net Exceed a 15% slope. C. Additional architectural trea'-zmenL along the north elevation , such as inset windows or projecting horizontal bands , shall be provided, d. Setback first floor of structure 3 feet from ultimate rear property line. e. A conceptual plan showing how adjacent lot can be integrated into the development and the adjacent restaurant parking lot shall be provided . 2 . Valet. oarking shall .be utilized all ' year. ;'round. .t RCA -- 9/3/85 -3 ( 3129d), , t huntington beach development services department STAf f EPOR TO: planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August .9, 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONIAL USE PERMIT NO, 85-26/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-11 At the Planning Commission meeting of July 16, 1485 , the commission continued Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 and Coa9tal Development ` Permit No. 85-11 and directed staff to obtain additional information regarding the adjacent 50 foot wide lot with oil operation According to City records , oil production averages 2 . 6 barrels per day or 940 per year . Life expectancy of the well is undetermined. A preliminary appraisal of the subject property by our Real property Manager has indicated that it 's value ranges from $275, 000 to $300 ,000. Removal of the two wells would cost ap MO�*7-00 - xima�tely+ $50 ,000 resulting in a net property value of $225,000 to The applicant nailed a certified letter with an offer of 200,000 to purchase the property . On August. 1 , 1985, staff received a response letter and a copy of the offer to purchase from the property owner indicating that, he haft rejected the offer because of the proposed financing, mainly a provision that the owner shall finance 80% of the purchase price. The property owner of Taco Bell has been contacted and would be interested in consolidating the 50 foot wide lot with his property in the future . To do so at this tide is impractical because of a .Long term lease with Taco Bell . ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Staff Report dated .;uly 16 , 1985 2. Letter dated August 1 , 1985 from Larry Vasterling, owner of 50 foot wide lot ,and offer to purchase fron Patel . JWP: SH: kla i 3002d��W A-F w't!�► fir.. 1.".S .r i.. ., `i1, If j.. ..f '.•... .,; .�1 •,? .. ... r.7 ,. 1. r .Y tf.' rr y er 1'17 .. huntin9tQn beach development services 'department STA f f EPORT 1 1 TO: Pianning commission FROM: Development Services DATE: July 16 . 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-26/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85 -11 At the Planning Commission meeting of July 2 , 1985, the Comn. iosion continued Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26, a request to construct a 52-unit motel with a Special Permit request, and requested that the applicant submit a revised plan showing the driveway ranp to the subterranean parking with access from 8th. Street instead of the alley, and provide additional information regarding the feasibility of incorporating the adjacent 50 foot wido lot with the notel development . Staff has reviewed the revised plan and feels it is more conducive to the site and surrounding land uses . The driveway ramp to the subterranean parking is located at the southeast corner of the site . It is 23 feet in width at the top and narrows to 20 feat at t base of t subterranean parking . The subterranean parking has he he p g p g been revised to provide a loop system for better circulation . Intense landscaping is recommended in the front setback because the ramp encroachment has eliminated a portion of the front landscaped area . The Public Works Department has also reviewed the revised plan and recommends approval . The applicant intends to present additional information regarding the adjacent 50 foot wide lot at the Planning Commission meeting . I RECOMMENDATION: . c Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 with Special Permit Items 1 and 2 and Coastal Development Permit No . 65-11 with the revised plan dated July 11 , 1985 based on the July 2 , 1985 staff report findings and conditions as amended belcw: 1 . The site plan dated July 11 , 1985, and floor plans and elevations dated June 6, 1985 shall, be revised and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director reflecting the following modifications : a. The drive approaches on 8th. Street shall. conform to Public Works standards . AMbksl ,.�, �t•i titd�A - ' gin; i huntington beaph development services department STA f f EPORT NO I I TO: Planning Commission FROM • Development Services De. to P 'I DATE: July 2, 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PE RMIT NO 05-261'COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85•-11 APPLICANT: Nan Patel DATE ACCEPTED: 8791 Garden Grove Blvd . June 18 , 1965 Garden Grove , CA 92641 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: REQUEST: To permit. construction August 17, IM `~ of a 52-unit motel with a j special permit request ZONE: Downtown Specific for encroachment of a Plan, District One canopy 101 into the required 15 ' exte: ior GENERAL PLAN: General side yarn setback .and Commercial for a reduction in drive -, �h aisle widths . EXISTING USE: Vacant LOCATION: 800 Pacific Coast Hwy. ACREAGE: . 45 net acre (northwest corner of PCH and dth . Street ) ++ I I 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No . e5--26 With Special Permit ( items 1 and 2 ) and Coastal Development Permit Nc . 85-11 based on the findings and with the conditions of approval as outlined in Section 7. 0 of this report . .2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 in conjunction with a -Special Permit and Coastal Development Permit No. 85-11 is a request to develop a ,'three-story, 52-unit motel including a manager 's ;unit and maid 's quarters on a 0. 45 net acre vacant site at , the 'northwest corner of Pacific Coast Highway and 8th. Street Tile 'Sepecial Permit request is to allow the encroachment of a ,canopy with-- support eet into the required 15 `feet exterior .side, ,akd setbac . . col umris 10 f q Y k from 8th . .'Street t for an 18 foot wide drive ramp "in ' Iieu . of the required 24 foot width requirement, and for 25 feet-6 inches wide driveway aisles in lieu cf, the required' 2 / friot wide requirement ., , •/MIt]�1 Prior to any action on conditional - Use Permit No. 85-261 it .is necessary , for the Planning Commission to review and . act on Coastal Development Permit No. 85-11 , 6. 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The proposed motel Consists of 50 guest rooms, a manager 's 'unit and one maid 's quarters situated in a three story structure over one level of subterranean parking. The motel 's maitt` entrance faces :8th. Street . Certain architectural elements have been incorporated into the building' s design to create a mediterranean theme such as the roofing , white textured stucco walls , balconies enclosed with horizontal handrails , arches , windows , low planter boxes , and skylights . Each motel room takeF advantage of the ocean views . A glass elevator is the focal point of the building facade facing Paeific Coast Highway. A deck and spa provide recreational amenities on the rooftop. Landscaping is Provided within all setback areas and ?.ncluaes palm trees , berming and clustering of plant materials . Tthe Following is a statistical summary of ,the project: STATISTICAL ANAhYSIS: r Proposed Development Development Standards Site size . 45 net acre min. width 1007 Street frontage 125 ' (along PCH ) 100 ' (along PCH ) Building height 35 ' 35 ' Site coverage: 3:. 6% 50k Setbacks: Front Yard ( PCH ) 25 ' 25w Interior Side Yard 18 , 20% of lot width with a mi.n. . 7 ' for Interior side yard , and 15 ' for exterior ' side yard . Exterior Side Yard (8th. Street ) 36' ( 3 story motel ) 5 ' ( 14168 high canopy) * Rear Yard (alley) 2. 5 ' ( first Floor ) 3 ' 2. 5 ' (3nd. and 3rd. 0 ' (cantilevered ' flooO str•ucIttires ) y' * � Special Permit request. Staff, Report - 7/2/85 M3_ (2780d) s t r in a loss of A However , this will be offset bparking spaces . sae Yethe increase of on-st.eet parking due to the planned o cul-de-sac onth . 'Street at the alley. , In addition, the entrance driveway can accommodate four stacked loading spaces . There are three primary uses and parcels fronting Pacific Coast Highway between 8th . Street and 9th . Street ; the subject property, which is currently vacant, is an oil operation on a 50 foot wide parcel , and -a Taco Hell restaurant. Approval of the motel Will leave the 50 foot wide parcel isolated and substandard in size ( Section 4 . 3 . 02 ) . The applicant has indicated that he intends to eventually acquire the parcel and integrate it with the motel use, but it is presently economically infeasible. Future incorporation of the parcel into either the motel use or adjacent restaurant use for parking or building expansion would be workable . Staff is recommending that the applicant be required to acquire the adjacent lot and present a conceptual plait of all parcels for review by ,the Development Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits . I£ , after making an honest offer to purchase the adjacent lot ,, the applicant is unable to c:onsumate acquisition, this request shall be referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration . Overall , the development complies with the intent and purpose of the Downtown Specific Plan . The motel uce is buffered from residential uses by an alley. Physical design of the building respects the view, light and air corridors to the ocean . it blends in well with the proposed mediterranean theme of the Dow,litown area and is in close proximity to Main Street and the pier . 7 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grcnt the Special Permit for items l and 2 and appre;ve Conditional Use Permit No . 85-26 and Coastal Development Permit No. 85-11 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions : FIt"DINGS FOR SPECIAL PERMIT ITEMS 1 AND 2: i 1 . The encroachment of the single story, unenclosed canopy up to 5 feet of the exterior side property line is unobtrusive and enhances the main entrance of the building . 2. A reduction of the drive aisle widths from 27 feet to 25 feet-6 inches is acceptable since it pertains to the subterranean parking structure which is used for valet parking only. 3. The proposed deviations will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the ne.ighborhood `or city in general , nor injurious to the value of adjacent properties . 4 . $ achieving project is consistent with objectives of the ' downtown oc c Plan in the iatura�l landieaturea and compatiblel le withth �esuzrounding►tenvixonment ` Staff Report- - 7/2t05 -5-- 2780d } . r.... .. .... .. ... t,...z ,. r. ..: .... ,.,... -i a N � (I.'�� t in a loss of4 parking spaces. However, this will be offset by the increase of on-street parking die to the planned caul-de-sac on 8th . Street at the alley. in addition, the entrance driveway can accommodate four stacked loading spaces. There are three primary uses and parcels fronting Pacific. cant Highway between 8th. Street and 9th . Streets the subject property, which is currently vacant , is an oil operation on a 50 foot wide parcel , and a Taco Hell restaurant . Approval of the motel will leave the 50 foot wide parcel isolated and substandard in size (Section 4 . 3 . 02) . The anpl,icant has indicated that he intends to eventually acquire the parci2 and integrate it with the motel use , but it is presently economically infeasible . Future incorporation of the parcel into either the motel use or adjacent restaurant use for parking or building expansion would be workable. Staff is recommending that the applicant be required to acquire the adjacent lot and present a conceptual plan of all parcels for review by the Development Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. If , after making an honest offer to purchase the adjacent loto the applicant is unable to consumate acquisition , this request shall be referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration . Overall , the development complies with the intent and purpose of the Downtown Specific Plan . '"he motel use is nuf `ered from residential uses by an alley. Physical design of the building respects the view, . l light and air corridors to the ocean. It blinds in well with the proposed mediterranean theme of the Downtown area and is in close proximity to Main Street and the pier . 7. 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant the Special Permit for items 1 and 2 and approve Conditional Use Permit No . 85-26 and Coastal Development Permit NG., 65-11 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions : i FINDINGS • FOR SPECIAL PERMIT ITEMS 1 AND 2 : 1 . The encroachment of the single story, unenclosed canopy up to 5 feet of the exterior side property line is unobtrusive and enhances the main entrance of the building . 2. A reduction of the drive aisle widths from 27 feet to 25 feet-6 s inches is acceptable since it pertains to the subterranean parking structure which is used for valet parking only. 3 . The proposed deviations will not be detrimental to the general health , welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood or City in general , nor injurious to the value of Adjacent properties. 4 . The 'project is consistent with , objectiven of the ' Downtown; Specific Plan in achieving a development adopted to .the natural f land features and compatible with the surrounding environmeyit. Staff Report 7/2/85 . 5 L ( 2780d) } FINDINGS FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N0. 85--11 s w' the i s C antb ' ' 1 . The proposed 52-unit motel is consistent with h Ci y o � Zone suffix and the Downtown Specific Plan District I standards, except as provided for in the Special Permit, request, as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicabln to the property; and conforms with the plans , policies, requirements and standards of the City 's Coastal Land Use Plan. 2 . The proposed development conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act . Adequate public access to the beach is provided on 8th . Street and Pacific Coast Highway; and building layout and _ design optimizes visual views to the ocean . 3 . The proposed development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner that iz consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan . Existing underground sewer and water utilities in 8th. Street along with the required improvements as described in the conditions of approval are sufficient to handle the proposed development. FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85•-26 : 3 . The proposed 52 unit motel will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing in the area , not upon the value of the propert 67$ within the vicinity. 2. The proposed use is compatible with existing use in the vicinity. 3. The proposed development ?s consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan . 4 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of use at the time the Downtown Specific Plan Zoning assignation was plaec3 on the subject property. 5 . Th2 location , site layout, and design of the proposed motel use does properly adapt the proposed three-story motel structure to streets , driveways , and alleys , and uses in a harmonious manner , 6 . Access to and parking for the proposed use will not create undue traffic problems if designed as prescribed in the attached conditions of approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COND-MONAL USE PERmrT NO. 85-26 : 1 . The Site plan , floor plans , and elevatiorne dated June '8 1985 shall be revised and ©ubmitted for review and approval by -the Planning Director reflecting the following modifications: is St a f f Report, 7/2/85 �6.. t 780r1 y ,, v + a. The ,southerly drive approach; on . 6th. Street .shall ire a minimum 27 feet wide and s radius type; the northerly drive a roach shall be eliminatedi and a,, 25 foot wade on--sitePariveway shall be provided' between the drive approach and the alley. b . The access ramp to the subterranean parking shall be minimum 24 feet in width. c . The underground parking layout shall be revised to create a continuous loop system. d . Setback first floor of stru,-Lure 3 .feet from ultimate rear property .7.ine. e . A conceptual plan showing the adjacent lot rolled into this development . 2 . Valet parking shall be utilizes all year round. 3 . A parcel. map shall be submitted and recorded prior to the issuance of building permits for consolidating the exi.eting 75 foot wide lots . 4 . The applicant shall make an offer to acquire the adjacent 50 � foot wide lot and integrate into the motel development , if the applicant is unable to acquire this parcel , a letter of offer and rejection shall be submitted to the Department of Development Services . 5 . A detailed landscape plan and sprinkler plan shall be in accordance with the Downtown Landscape Guidelines , including the use of extensive berming in the tront: setback area along Pacific Coast Highway; and shall be submitted and approved by the Development Services and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. - A materials pallet indicating Final color choices of the building materials must be submitted .for review and approval by the Development Services Director prior to the issuance of r building permits . 7 . Provisions must be . made to buffer the motel from the adjacent oil operation , and are subject to review and approval by the Fire and Development Services Department . S . An automatic sprinkler system approved by the Fire Department . shall be installed throughout the complex per N,* F. P..A. STandard 13 . This system neat be supervised perFire - bepartment Standardn. 5. A :yet standpipe s stem approved b the Fire Ae artment' shall Y PP Y P- be installed in the stairways and is to comply wJ.th: Uniform . . Building rode Standards. . Staff Repprt 7/2/ 5 -�- 2780d ' ..w,...J . . . .a•......, ...•..,... . r. •; • ..• . rlsrd,•h.^1 ..1W Y4�sr. V• .• _ - An alarm system approved by the Fire Department shall he installed throughout per Uniform lore Codes Standards. 11 To acc ommodate ` the vse of an anb�a�ance gurney, - every floor % served by elevator& shall have . -.,zcess t:o, at least, one elevator car having a minimum inside car platform �of sir ( 6 ) feet by eight ( 8 ) feet wide by four ( 4 ) feet by three ( 3 ) inches deep with a minimum clear opening riidth of forty-two 42 inches. 12 . The water system must be upgraded to provide afire flow of 3,540 GPM. New fire hydrants are to be installed in areas approved by the Fire Department . 13. The stairway enclosure on the south side most include a corridor on the ground floor leading from the stairway to the exterior of the building or the stairway can exit directly to the south side exterior . 14 . Two exits shall be required for the spa/lounge on the roof deck . 15. The 2-1/2 foot of alley dedication shall be paved per City Standards. The developer shall also pave the entire dedicated alley from 9th . Street to the northwesterly property line . 16 . The curb and gutter along 8th . Street shall be constructed at 29. 5 feet from the centerline to accommodate future perpendicular parking when 8th , Street is cul-de-laced. ALA x 17. A 2 foot wide public utilities easement is required behind the sidewalk . ' ln. An S inch minimum water main shall be constructed in 8th . Street. 19 . A sewer main shall be constructed in P,Gh , Street from Pacific Coast Highway to the orange County Seinitation District 'Sew'er- Trunk in Walnut Avenue and connect at er, approved location. 20. kny abandoned oil wells shall be moaif':,nd as required by the t, Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits. _. 21 . Low volume heads shall be used on all showers . 22. All building spoils such as unusable lumber, ` wire, pipe and other surplus or unusable materials stall be disposed of at an off-site area equipped to handle them. 23 . Energy--efficient lighting shall be used in open space areas. Staff Report - 7/2/65 ..g_ ( 2780d ) ! rAt.r*AI*— ..! ... ....yam:�.v.lrl.d�liLA'�1 _.r��. w�w+y ^1-•� 24 . A d+stajile' d soils analysis ahall .,be prepared by a registered soils-'engineer . This analysis shall include. =-site - san;oling `I and: `laboratory teak fng of materials to provide detail recommendations regarding grading,-chemical and fuel properties foundations, retaining walls , ,streets and JL 2 .` The Planning Co-nmission reserves the right to revoke this Conditiunal Use Permit it any violation - of these conditrions • or •` the Huntington Beach Ordinance 'Code occurs . ' A i TACEMENTS 1 . Area reap 2 . Site plan , floor plan and elevations 3. 'Revised Site Plan (Staff recommendation ) 4 . ' Special Permit request 5. Warrative 6 . Alternative Action ( to be submitted at meeting ) JWP: S • la i i , , **I i , � tkl , ;3 Staff Report 2 ! '' ! 'L t^ .ii y r i'• r.l '1 ,, r,... :J ,ae.;•, °'".�};....! �` - -1 a Ai i•i as-!`rh l,:u.� �i 1� a , y 1,,6Ai..t._. ,,. .e . .__,. •x. E._'.._tt.-•a4 ...r.i• ,.;.b" .' ., _.:- - .. .. _. . -- — - -- — -- - _ - — -- ttzl'.f .A.r.t•x".u... ..wv-..•s.. ?.r.+ �A .. .,. ,7.r:, •ti'......,....i., .s � �.1� �;4T.il.�i'1�L1���1�•��__^_.. y j Agh f.� . -- RITIa -ter •i~ .� f�M+MIb.�Rl�MwwANM,r 'IY _ t car IN 01 G V /1 eft jif tik �' '. � 1 � '•r. � •..� �r � ti iq Y? NAY a? ,! � � ' f L,i�� y ' .. 'a ;i .5 y, :I• I•:�•3 ...�.. . , �+:i.� � yS�• � ..,... �J•..•...� .«..ram r IS � hr•fit M44•w vMW IIv -�.yr 111 •� �� � � 1 I` i ff II i Mr , ,�• , 1 ,, , ,�t ' ' ' w i I, `", � ��Ott�`1 � ,• °, _ Y . S ` ..raww.�.r•irr.w�rrw•rrr .w�/•r•....r„..•� .� { Zi Lb Ild Wit;awom � Quin� � 41 1.7 ,4?,i -� ,t� ,, a .,G W.� i;:L� ;5 i "•t �.'f', ;e�._;r�R" ',,:f'.�+"ltF•r•�i�+'�.r arc tiY?. N. '���'t;i.i;,± �i; �n ,.r ,e�3•` :::t }"�? L. _ ,,....,..� �.r�1,. --�i+.w\Yh.+•� .•.--:__. _ -.�!IwNr�V•'M1.r�w\.a ../+_.w.Xr �1 ._._• � ♦.•v r+ ♦.in�i.�.+n.::..w�wr MNrAr1.y..�.�A.,.+,v.w.�—.n,y.w:......-� _. .. _ — � �`�' �.�.''•''.'� ;NtI'7s3 • in) NV•1d klld 17-76 q- 81• a� - - ��� "-ter - =�- .� ..w.►.....«vti � � - 1 --41 �: �T-- 7 jw ' e _ l f +. i i- '�!Z ..,,._ _ .aa ,.r— _ _ w.ra+}11wrr^�a►.,c:.:.:.��+.-" t � .. ' •�_-r.�. ..-,:a r Sf1 w-... f.. .:-:,w `y. K_:i } ....., F-...: '.,_� -,,•'-' - - _.^� - - �.% t JUKE 2a, 1985 365 w.'GnKv>1rAwocWft AVENUE. S=-203 t.40N1EREY. PARK CAUFORNLA 91754. (818I 571-&*0 ` OfPARTWIT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF Hth4TiNGTSIN BEACH 2000 MAIN STPIET P.O. Mx 190 NUNTIKGTON 8£ACR CA 92648 RE: QUALITY INN MOJECT, 800 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, hIRiTINGTON BEACH. DFAR PLANNERS: I Ali WRf TING THIS LETTER t0 EXPLAINTHE VARIAtKE C+f WHiCN 14 G'UALfTY INN PROJECT IS !"pXLVED WITH. DUE TO THE SITUAn011 IN WHICH NO INGRESS OR EGRESS IS ALL(7WED BY CITY REUILATICNS ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. � HA�IEaE51Gh'ED A LC�t}RIV£(xi T}� EIGNrii AVEM SIDE OF Tip DUILDING WITH A CANOPY IN ORDER TO EWAKE THE ENTRY OF THE MUILDING. SINCE Tf3: SEC= AND THIRD FLOORS Cf THE BJILDING WARE DESMED TO BE SET FLRTI'i£R BACK Mal THE STREET IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE OCEAN VIEW FROM EIGHTH AVEtOJE.THE PROPOSED ONE-STORY CA14OPY ON EIGHTH AVEM E tS A NECkSSITY NOT CNLY FOR AN INVITING AT?'-0,PK9f AND TO IDENTIFY TIC �--"' ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDiNS, BUT ALSO FOR THE PF(VIS101 OF A SHADED AREA FOR GUEST ARRI- VRLS ANO THE COUVI)AENCE OF VALET PARKING. THE U%ERGPOU?O GARAGE WAS DESIGWD SA A:S TO NOT EXPOSE THE WN6lE PAtiXING AREA TO TIC PtZLIC AND TO MAINTAIN A NICE SCENERY ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. IN PROVIDING TIC CON- VENIENCEOF VALET PARKING, THE 18* RAMP TO 14 GARAGE FPCM THE ALLEY Ate 25'-6' BACK- UP AND 1'UlI`EMIZ SPACE IN M TK UNDERGROUM GARAGE IS MORE THAN SMICIENT FOR THE VALET ATTROANT TO WORK WITH. WE APPRECIATT Trt APPROVAL OF OUR PAUCT BY M DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. N%T WO XD LIKE TO COOPERATE WIM THE CITY AND CITY PLANNIW;STX'lf TO C0I`frII*'UE TO,%%;OUT A 5EAlli'IFL+: ` PRc1SECT WHICH WOULD BE IN BEHETIT FOR BOTH Tip C. Y AND THE INVESTOR. THAIa YOIS, SINCERELY YOURS, SM LEE.'AIA REPRESENTATIVE OF APPLICANT MR. NAN PATEL SL ,sy HUNTINGTON BEA0 DEVELOPMENT SSW-eiCCs ; JUNK 4 V,,r 1 P.O. Box 190 HU0.1 on CA 9264S k .' tJViMA Ot1ra�OMrKIVT • MAfIN9IVG • N11CM�t�C�t/I�IE • tiNii01MR AlI�rI' • MV1"f ftm Dn$" • C19NStI1L1C'f " C ti .r:`. .r.z•°!,"' .,,tea _ ,. t . . '1 a .':y, t4- � „r;' , - , � } ° ;,, - t THM GUALIT INN f , G , `t OW MUhMiNGTON BEACH lx c c Huntington , - g Beach has been recognised as a beautiful city -` Y with breathtaking ocean views and a very long and ext6nsive coast line . These and other features have made Huntington Beach a famous resort for tourists to spend vacations and weekends. The proposed project would be able to serve not s only city and surrounding area residents , but also tourists 3• and visitors of the Southern California area by providing them with convenient motel services . The motel is proposed a aquality Inn, a franchise known for its high quality. The proposed Quality Inn would be lo- cated on the vacant land on the northwest corner of Pacific' Coast Highway and Eighth Avenue. Conceptual approval has been granted by the Duality Inn franchise concerning location, ' site , and schematic design . The 3-story motel roject would � 9 Y F . .. ' provide 50 units of lodging with a con temporary 'MadJ% cXrAnean architecture theme per city requirements . The driveway entrar►ce G would consist of a drive loop combined with a canopy. Under- ground . parking with valet parking service would be prc-4tided with entrance through the alley. The drive 100' p. wou1d be to Gated on Eighth Avenue with no driveway opening ,onto 'pacific 'Coast' Highway so as to not promote the traffic load 'on P.0 H., The building i9 . pxoposesd l do , be set back - 25' from Facific Cogst. Highway and 34 ft. from Eighth Avenue' in order to reserve aeon , for anduca►p ng which ,would, provide a more, pleasing ,and greener f view from the street. ' In response to the location and climate of".the city, ; the landscaping would include palm trees and othor landscape material sub ect ro strong Zevailin w P 3 g �- g finds. . In keep-- r ing with the Mediterranean theme, the buildinq would include Spanish file roof , white textured stucco walls, arches, balco- nies ., bright accent awning, and other common elements of the , style . In order to promote a festive feeling, colorful banners would be provided on the canopy. The interior of the building would include a fountain in the lobby, a custom spa , an enclosed deck with breathtaking ocean views, and an eyecathing glass ele- vator with a 180 degree view overlooking the ocean . All these features would influentially respond to enhance the city expe,ri- • ence. The project is to be located in a commercial and residen- tial area along Pacific Coast Highway. On the east ride of the property across Eighth Avenue stands a mote. ) ; or, the test side, .1 a restaurant; on the north side across from the alley, apart- ments ; on the southside across Pacific Coast Highway, a condo development along with the coastline. This proposed project will not only enhance Pacific Coast Highway by providing a modern quality lodging service which will attract people and business, but also will progress and promote prosperity to the City of Huntington Beach. , t I' J , r 7/31/8S LARRY R • VASTERLINr, 437 N•SAPPINGTON GLENDALE, MO e� �122 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER CIVIC CENTER 2000 MAIN, STREET HUNT I NGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 V° mp SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #85-26 ail ZrvLH 22 , t0j85 I RECC-% VG7 � ESnTE PuRCKAsE Caw'TROCT R01A t4AN PEEL FOR PRoPEM74 (LOT$ 6 � t7 ON PC GMCLo5ED 774E PART (15 t4VOLVED MADE NO PR10'1Z CONTPGr wrm mE CoNCERwiwq THi.5 Coj�TQAtr OI"FEP, BUT AN ENCLOSCt7. LE-i7r.-P D14SrRUCTLED 171E TO EITHER SIGN oR WZ 11E "ME 4FPc,.9.* I COULD wor AGCEPT TN15 0;:FR siwC£ 17` REQUIRES 8D 7 ou)WER Fi t4 cIN q ) I3E CA USE 5Ul3TRAf-rlWq mj E E)LIST11,34 NOTE RQD SSLES Comm i55104S P2014 TIA 0r-cP-tMG FRICe OF ?00 000 Do" ARS WOULD LEAVE A 3ALA LE 01: - 131 000 „�,.� �+ t.�OLLA?S lW ESCROW * .L CA L.LEb o►ALD PAr-rEiZ ,6M -nim K ENT1 AND AS KEb A 800 r 71iE 80 % ou.)0ER rrN;lu-tM4 AND HE SFflD 'rlriFIT' NA PA-T EL WAS .4 MN4 O I-IM17ED MEANS ANb COULZ NCrF ff:;-'C4Zt) 7b OFFER mt)CN EQ01lk'9- ALrzo THC CON,RAC 0t-FERS H1c No SEC.UR I't" , rF A;:7-E A TIME TNC Bu4=R NEt05 REQUIRE F11� COULD SELL. 'TNE w ELx- ANC, GR THE P ZcPEZ'T (4 'S E2 uiPNEO� ro RECoOP HIS 'Ouw►a PA4M0)Tj AND THEN QUrr CLR!m ThE PRO PERT&1 . WHEN r WOUL-D 14CED To I?i?LA B �. r. THE !EQulflT 6wT— 7? RES'rORE -r1lt PZORRTy . A N1 Wit.L- s N Ea r0 COOP r R.A`t E W lrl1 THEL '?LRw 14Jq c:U("M i 15sioN oa TtilS Mh7TER BUT 1 FEEL -TNpr, Z SFtovLh t o Q U A` E D� � �E IQEC�c�1R ��� � AccEPr � �aD� RNA 3: WOULD BE OPPOSFZ TO THIS USE, z 1el'tm Ir tau 1..E sa ,r. WOULD ')E �3 L l To ENABLrc ME TO VEVC-L0?E MH P1�dQ��r'� • A 8F1tJKF_R'S COPY ' txrolV.." ►ard 0100003031:.. 4iS�.cxt WAlp rLOU ' REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT D RECEIPT FOR DEPOSIT S IS MORE THAN A 14ECEIFT FOR MONEY.n 13 INTENDED TO OF.A LEGALLY @1NDiNG CONT11ACT,FIEAD IY•a�'�': �hP1EFtllLf.li, . Huntington Beach July 17 , California. 8� Nan Pate Received from herein called Buyer. the sum of_ pne Thousand and n0,.,l100--- -- - - ---------- DollanS evidenced by cash Ct,cashier's check D.or 0, personal check M pasyaWe to .iS..la =1iA._.. ._..�._... Comm- . to be held uncrihed until acceptance of this offer. as deslesit on account of urchilie price of T►+'D.rtisi.f�dredlhot�sAU nd noliQQ--------- - - -- ---------►oollatsx 1*2 40 _ 0** for the purchase of property, situated in--.Runti D gtQn -RLAr-h . County of.... 0ran9C Wei described as follows: _ act DelcriAtlon in Escrow (Lots 6 Al 7 Pacifio Coast . igtwAy between_ 8t b 7Lf�� 1, Buyer, will deposit in escrow with E.SCt'OW CQ�a�nyLt'p �e >����� the baluxe of purchaser price as follows. 1. lAQn.atnceRraIIsf: Qf th s offter.,buYQ .1L. ,�sg Q..ESir.¢�..4ne Thusand._.�.l.�a. .:. ' oo� Eai t�Ll AeY... sL:QQ�.tQ1 PSu h-5LPri ce ofNun�red ThousalL..QQ.IJ)AC2• 2. Prior to the..raQse- of_Eurow. aunt wo) ylncg an add.i+,ignal Thirty Nine Thollsand Sollars lII?n F4C.CnMI to rertr P.tl _?.R% .tlf the Pl1LGhRS t'�S' _ 3....S:rLlnr.�s to arru ha _k 1 c T I5� Dgr�,d i_n the ar�aunt..af._Gne�ivad `' 2�.1 . aim..IOX-intest....airartizecLo eL'.d..perfad of thirty year4_ a] due .dad..pay�e..i<n; IQ yeaC1.x with payments of S1 _404_11 ppr mnnttl-and-one. &116Qn palTnent of $1 2,O-Al the end of 10 _,., ypar with nln n empayment penalty- 4- trc ase_ Pri;;P in...to in 1 1to ba.th.. 1.1 kiCl1. Qtt€..P.rD�ud[i�si����.4 Hsi s per day andAne wtil1 idle—all surface rights and an l mineral righis. in-It) days fa":> of _U29Lfl5-and-Is r. tin ent upon xlla 11 cr_ Mr. Moody canteU.;ing i r essrs' w,iSh_AU_mi tos .Eu_row on this...s,ame nro4erty.____,.�____,._,_.,._..._. i Set forth ebovs any terms and conditions of a fictual nature spplicsNt to this tale, such as financing, prior sale of other property, the mstter of structural pest zontrol inspection, rlepain and penensl property to be induded in the tale. 2. Deposit will © will not EX be increased by S to S . within days of acceptance of this offer. 3. Buyer does Q does not intend to occupy subject property as his residence. 4. The supt)lements initialed below ve irtcotporated as part,of this agreement. other �... reluutturgil/Mt Control Ctv1.l4Fl.C>n ae.wrnrnt ..._...ocwpsmv AaN.Twnl $pK+N StuQ�1s �On•o��lo�u�i .......-VA Att+y+�dmMt .-,.-...-...., ..,; Flood Inwrtnc• micbwrs •.-...•• f►4A Ar amlAwnt ...-....... da P 4e awl• ;+I Buyer .and Seller xknawfe ~e reee� t of a copy o! this pane, which constltuteT Pa 1 ot_..2._.i' i X " ^ -----� X- iYtl.s !�L►i�1 . I A 1ltcht.1L37ATC BROKER IS THE 191ILSON OVAUf1EO TO ADVW ON REAL ESTATIL IF YOU DISIAI:LJFGAL ADVK) CON3NLT YOUR ATTORNEl. TNiS STANOARILEO t1�MENT fOR USE IN SIUME rRAFISA.CrrCN3 64AS OC-41►PPADYE0 6Y 1HE CALIFORN1AASSQCtArKpi Of AEAL10111190 O TNL VATt:BAR Of CAUF011e1M1•4 FORM OUL'r,NO 14EPRESENTATX)N IS MADE AS TO THE A1Pt1;Q%1AL OF THE FOAM OF SUPPLEMENTS !re ,f LIEG �+ VA pL� NY ItOiTY Of ANY PROVISION'00 tHE ADEf 09 ANY PROVISION Ill A &KCIf eC TRAINSACTION 17.9�iQULD NOT dE USE-0 IN Co upt F X TRANSACIlMiS On wIT11 EXTENSIVE fu10ERS OR 9*1TXXI$ Fal IAAM fa�Ta.fAdtwM Cs1ho+Rl•��wthtlnw RBI 11MItM�A - .,—._, .-- r ..�— . °BROKER'S comer -�. REAL ESTATE PURL' ASE Ct�NTRACT RND F EIPT'FOR DEPOSIT The follo%ing terms and conditions are hereby incorporated In and made a part of Burr:'.O's:far 6 Buyer and Seller shall deliv�,r�Iigned instructions to the escrow holder within days Irom Seller's acceptance wtlich . - shall provide for closing within yy. .days from Sellers acceptance. Escrow fees to be prdd as follows: Na>~mol 8uy�rl�.St11 en Escalwa..Fad:..to V-1d.5 own sts 7.` Title is to be free of liens, encumbrances, ments, restrictions,rights and conditions of record or known to Seller. other than the fof.ow+rg: (1) Cu tnt property taxes, (2) covenants, conditions, restrictions, and public utility easements of record, if any, provide-d the., slime do not aMettely affect the continued use of the prope rty for the purposes for which it is ptesently being used, unless reasonably disapproved by Buyer in writing witnin_..20...._,c)4ys of receipt of a current preliminary title teporl furnishetf at Sel l er 5 and (3) _ Seller shall furnish Buyer at S f!13 Pr'S expense a standern California Land Title Association policy ' iuued by 1st-ARler4can—T-itle Company, showing title vested in Buyer subject only to the, above, If Seller l•l it urwviWing urunable to eliminate any title matter disapotoved t y Buyer as above, Seller may terminate this agreement, or (3) fails to deliver title as above, Buyer may terminate this agreement; in either case, the deposit shall be returned to Buyer. 8. p:omrty taxes, prernisims on insurance acceptable to Buyer, rents, interest, and--Oil .&Y,nugs shall be prarated as of (al tht date ofrecordation of deed: or (h).--At—C Ins P__oL scr.(lYL And bond o► atsestment which is a lien shall ber.—r'"' -rt Seller shall pay E st of transfer taxes. if any. ass 9. Possession thall be delivered to Buyer (a)on close of escrow, of4ts)-r"4etertit m----------------gays atftor close of esl=ow or (r) 10. Unless otherwise designated in the escrow instructions of Buyer, title shall vest as follows:-ro tie M-P intod.in ESr1Mjj_ (The manner of taking title may have significant legal and tax consequences Therefore,give this matter serious consideration, i 1. If Broker is a participant of a Hoard multiple listing service ("ft1LS"). the. Broker is authotired to rewit ,he sale, its p+ice_ terms, and financing for the information, publication, dissemination, and use of the, author+retl Board members. IZ If Buyer fails to complete said purchase as herein provided by reason of any default of Buyer, Seller shall Im released from his obligation to sell the property to Buyer and may proctwd against Buyer upon any aai or remedy which he may have in law or equity; provided, however, that by placing their initials here Buyer: 4 ? Seller: agree that Seller shall retain the deposit as his liquidated dama gn. If the described property is aft d with no mart: than four units, one of which the Buyer intends to occupy as his residence, Seller shall retain as liqur '_ damages the deposit actually paid, or an amount therefrom, trot mote than 3%of the purchase prices and promptly return t any excess to Buyer. 13. If the only controversy or claim txrvvern the parties +rites out of or relates to the ditposit+on of the Buyer't deposit, such controversy or Claim steall at the e'ection of the parties tv- deco icd by arbitration. Such arbitration shall be determined in :ecordance with the Flutes of the American Arbitrat+on Association, aid judgment upon the awtird rendered by the Arbitrater(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdicticsi thereof. The provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1283 05 shall tx appliuble to such arbitration, 14. In dny action or procreding ansing out of this agcement. the preva4mg party shall be entitled to reasonable attorne f's fees and costs. is. Time is of the essence. All mod+fir:ations or extensions %hall be in %%rit+rtg signed by the parties. 16. This cor+stitutes an offer to purchase the desrribtd property, Unless acceptance is signed by .rWer and the signed copy delivered to Buyer, in person or try mail tt: th ►css below, within 1Q.r __....diYs, this offer shalt to deemed revoked and the deposit shall be retur auye ackno eCript of copy hereof. By 7/29/85 - i Re I Estate oker I1��t.4�P. ties buyer .� n �g7 on Beach Address 1860Q, Mai it SL.,...5 ....fin.. �5� Address Telephone_(2j_Q._& -_Q556 Telephone ACCEPTANCE The undersigned Seller accepts and agrees to sell the property on the above terms and conditions,Seller has employed .Ma j0r__�_.�._ XtLkaz i1P,.rti es�/� /� ..��.—�. m Broohker(/(�t))and agrees to pay for services Vol sumo( Twelup lh0,usand..anda..0.t'�l�aw_wr.rr_..w_w.. .r....wwwr_ Dollars f� w..�2,5?Y�,==_+"* 1.pe1►sWe x follow". (a) Orr tK-ordation of the deed or other evidence of title.or(b)if completson of sale is prevented by default of Seller,upon Uler'sdefault of;el M if completion of sate is prevented by default of Buyer. only if and when Scaler eaatettt dama¢cs !torn Buyer,bryault or otnersvise and then in an amoununat less than orie-hall of the damsg" tetoveced, but nrJ; to e.ceed the ahory lee, after lirst deductirsg flit%and etc ovr%teens the Rxpcnsas of.cokctio-ol,i/any. In any action betoven Broker and Seller ititing out of this agreement.true prevailing party sh0l t" io reasonable alttooney's feet and cost].The uadersigried tcknowted,Tes receipt of a copy and authorites 8rokcr(s)to deliver*tigned copy to Buyer_ dated: Address 8roker(s) agree to the foregoing. Broker w_......Broker.:.�:..,:...,.:.. I}art :lltr.r.:w.__: acted: iuntitgton beach develo mon services' depart m4nt " . ffAf f r EPOS TO: Planning Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: August , 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-26/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-11 At the Planning Commission meeting of July 16 , 1985, the Commission continued Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 and Coastal Development Permit No. 85-11 and directed staff to obtain additional information regarding the adjacent 50 foot wide ?of with oil operalcn. According to City recordst oil production averages 2. 6 barrels per day or 940 per year . Life expectancy of the well is undetermined. ' I A preliminary appraisal of the subject property by* our Real Property i Manager has indicated that it 's value ranges fron 4 �275,000 to t300F000. Removal of the two wells would cost approximately $50,000 resulting in a net property value of $225 , 000 to $250 000. The applicant mailed a certified letter with an offer of 4200, 000 to purchase the property. On August 1 , 1985, staff received a response letter and a co • of the offer to purchase from the property t owner Pf P Pry p Y indicating that he has rejected the offer because of the proposed financing; mainly a provision that the yawner shrill finance 60% of the purchase price . The property owner of Taco Pell has been contacted and mould be interested in consolidating the 50 foot wide lot with his property in the :::cure . To do so at this time is impractical because of a long terry. lease with Taco Bell . ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report dated July 16, 1985 2. Letter dated August 1 , 1985 from harry Vasterling , owner of 50 foot aide lot�ana offer L•o purchase from Patel . ,.1 JWP : SDI:n la .:, t 3 0 0 Zd j�y,,�, AMX 40 A 14 1 i 1 • 1. hunt �tnn beach i�0 ic*�t ' 4+rpbir,4m�nt � _inq, �sv pEner�k s�ry STA If f f E P O R r.... . TO:, Plannin Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: July 16, 1985 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL;: USE PERMIT NO. 85-26/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT. PERMIT NO. 85-11 { At the. Planning Commission meeting of July 2 , .1985, : the Commisision' continued Conditional Use , Permit No . ".,--26, a request. IZo constauct 4 52- unit motel with a . Special . Permit request , and requested that the . applicant submit a 'revised plan showing, the 'driveway ramp to the subterranean parking with access from 8th . Street instead 'of tie alley, and provide additional information regarding the ' feasibi.lity of incorporating the adjacent 50 foot wide lot with 'the motel development Staff has reviewed the revised plan and feels it is avare. conduc ve y to the site and surrouning subterranean parking isalocatedaas tthe southeast corner of�theh site . It is 23 feet in width at the top and narrows to 20 feet' at the base of the subterranean parking . The subterranean park :ng• has been revised to provide a loop system for better circulation . ` Intense landscaping is recommended in the front setback becauseth'e ramp encroachment has eliminated a portion of the front landscaped area . The Public Works Department has also reviewed the revised plan and recommends approval . The , applicant intends to present additional information regard ng the adjacent 50 foot wide lot at the Planning CcrnmIS'si'on meeting . RECOMMENDATION: i Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 85--26 with Special Permit Items 3 and 2 and Coastal Development Permit No. 55--11 With the revised., pian dated July 11 , 1985 based on the July 2 , 1985 staff report finding '; and conditions as amended below; > 1 . The site plan dated July 11 , 1985 , and floor plans and elevations dated June 6 , 1985 shall be revised and aubmitted for review and a,ap�_roval by the Planning Director reflecting z the following modifications S a . The 'drive approaches on 8th. Street shall conforn, to , Public Works standards. A9ftF' ...r.r.r.'..r� II►ItV•liA F • 41 b: The driw•eway rain to the, $ub`ject park ng shall.- fx"ceed a '15�1 'slo a 't. c. :Addi.tiona^i architectural: .txeat�aent �ilong ehen;north elevation, ouch a3 . inset windows or gro jeCinq'; horizontal' :A 1 } bande shall be provided. `t d . Setback irs� ':fl:oor -of ' attucture 3 feet from t ltiiaar.p reer property line. :. e . A -concepeual ,plain showing how the. adjacent, lot -. Can be h` integrated into the development and"' the adjacent restaurant parking lot . 11 . To accommodate the use of an , ambulance gurney, .every '�f1Aar - served' by elevators shall haveins de8car'' latEorm of . six ' ak 1East one elevator car having :� , mi : , 'feet — eight inches wi'deEby four • feet , three inches deep with - a minimum clear ' opening width of ° forty-two inches. ATTACHMENTS r 1 . Revised si te',:plan dated July.11; 1985 i 2. Staff report dated July 21 1985 41. r. , ' ..'rstaft Report ' h+i tirpta� birch °d�rrilapr»nnt+� tt�iwic s +ddp*�t"rn*nt ffA _. ,­ R _ PORT TO:,';,• Planning Commission FROM: Development. Servicee " DATE: July 2, 1985 `SUBJECT. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85--2fi/COASToiL DEVEL0PMEN - PERmn NO. 85 11 APPLICANT: Nan Patel ; DATE ACCEPTED: 8791. Garden Grove .Blvd. June 1�8,1 Garden Grove, •CA 9.2641 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE : REQUEST: To permit construction August , of a 52-unit: motel with a special _permit. ,request ZONE: Downtown : Specific fo r. encroac;impnt of a P�nr District: One 4 ca nopy 10 ' ' into q re xhe GENERAL PLAN.t ..• General •� side yard setback and Commerci fora reduction in drive aisle widths. EXISTING USE: ' Vacant LOCATION: 800 - Pacifi.c Coast 'Hwy. ACREAGE. . 45 net acre (northwest corner of PCH and 8th. Street ) i 1 . 0 S13GGESTED ACTION: Approve Conditional Use Permit too. : 85--26 with. Special Permit: , t i teme Development1 ,a6d - 2 ) and Permit 8 - based on the , findingsCoastal and with the conditions of approval as outlined in Section 7. 0 of this report. 20 GENERAL INFORMATION: ' l conditional Use, Permit: "No. 85--26_ in canjunction with a ' Special Permit and 'Coaet:al Development Permit No. 85--1.1 is r, requeat, .to develop a three--story . 52-unit motel including a manager 's -n*it and � maid s quarters on a 0 . 45 net acre : vacant site rat , the nor,t�iwest corner of Pacific Coast Highway and St;h . Street. The +sp. ',6ial Permit. request Ls to allow the encroachmentmof_ 6 canopy with 'support., -side d setback, Columns 10 feet in4o the required 15 feet exterior ' .,from, 8th , street, . for an l8 foot "wide drive ramp in `lieu of, t:1:e" required 24 foot width requirementp and for 25 feet'41n6hea" wide driveway aisles in lieu of q nt. • , the re�gu,.{ re�• 27 foot wide re uircme AdXki ; •F M.3 tex�a7..r..�',,. , ,:.,�.....�:...»':. ... ....:.:;.+,......�.w..+...rear►'ir•xrivucw,s.-...i:..<...i��E1t:ic�./ f. -....,.�..�.Irwow....�.;'�+TMr•.w,.r�=-.-,...�, f +i Y t t: ' F.f,+�i,vSi St .. Ry S Y�i� r,'. t :"r, •� i.,,� } rs ts. ;`+' � -Fig 3 . — SURROUND USE, "zaNrNG 'AND GENERAL DESIGNATIONS: Ffiiflif=if���Miir.�Yoi Subject -Propetty: �,' '.) ' firs, ' 1 } J �f•i GENERAL. PLAN :DESIGNATION: Generail, Coiamsrcial ZONE: nrswntowri 'Specifi`c' Plan,' District 4t�e Lift ;USE: Vacant Nbrt] east of 5uki�ect, Propeirty- Y*; GENERALPLXN DE SIGNATION: High. Density Residential ► ;20N Downtown Speci fic Plan, District Two LAND USE: House ' f 'Northwest of Subject Property: 7 .. .a_ �.... r GENERAL PLAN DESTGNATION: '' General Commercial ZONE: DowntownrEpecific Plan, District One dil Produe'ti6n LAND .USE: ' Southwest of- subject Pro arty: 1 GENERAL- PLAN DESIGNATION Recreation ,open Space 3 ' ' ZONE. Downtown Specif is Plan, ' District ',Two LAND USES Muitipie-pim' ily Residential Southeast of Sub„ e .Prop„ �: LAN t GENERAL P {° DESIGNATION: iigh Density Residential f Downtown Specific Plan, District Tw � r p o LAND. USE: Motel 4 . 0 EmROt� JMENTAL 'STATUS i The" = proposed motel, project is exempt from environmental reUiew., because it is in -conformance with the bowntown' Specifi:c '4 an is Er►vironxeental: +Qudlit Act. he Lnviro�nmentaI.- Im act Re ort . �ursuant to Section , of t Californ �� <<=f 5. 0 COASTAL STATUS: The project is located within Coastal Zone boundaries under; appeal juriediction and subject to Coastal ' Development Pe' rmi,t;review , and approval. staff has 'reviewed Coastal Development Fermit . No :. 85_.11 .'' for the .52-'unit motel and determined that it � does ' comply `Kith the t f policies set forth in the Coastal Lan& Uae• Man and:' Chapter'," of .the California Coastal 'Act ,because adequate ,public ,,access toIthe'.,�beach,, is - peavided on 8th. Street, and Pacific Coast NVghwayJ � ;and' buildfng Y � J terra a 5 • views,,: � . ;The la out and design , to kos `advanta a of visua tia+ the ocean: buildin s :nedi nee n theme, upper -storysetbacks� ' and landscaped areas 'provide positive ;visual . impacts and assures `compatibility .wf th e • ing and'- future devel'ci merits, within: he Coastal ' zone and x`ist R nowntown ,Specific `Plan: r " ' Staff- Report 7/2185 �t2 d� 2 78Q . • rti 3' on Conditional Use Permit; No BS=-2S , it is Priessr to any action ar for; the Planning:'commission to: review and act':`on Coastal hevelopment Permit No. 85-11 . a u 5 :0 ISSUES AND ANALYiI TheP , P motel consists ,of 50 guest rooms , a, managers unit ro � ��ad `� � and . puated , in a..three story . structure,.,over:.,one level of, subterranean,;>taeking. The motel'.s. iaxn entrance faces; 8th. one maiti.� ��...quat.ters> s i Stredt," di ,, 's 'des o:hitectural :elements have been,-incor orated into Cer $in ar P th i ng gn _ to,-'create a mediterranean theme, Such :as tale roofing, whine:, te' ure'd ' 'stucco' walls , balconies enclosed with r� skylights . 'r o hEach$mote,laroom$�akesaadva�' low, planter ,boxes, and , ntage , of the ocean views'. A ,,glass elevator is' the focal point, of , the building facade , facing t Pacific Coast Highaay..;;, A deck and pa pzovide recreational amenities '.on the rooftop., Landscaping is provided `within .$11 setback ,areas and include' palm trees, berming and clustering of plant `materials. The following is a statistical 'summary of the . project; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS : Proposed Development Develol2ment Standards s Site size . 45 net acre min. Width 100 ' Street frontage 125 ' ,(along PCH) 200 ' (along PCH) , Building height 351 35 Site coverage: 37. 6% 50% Setbacks ; Front Yard ( PCH ) 25 25 ' jl Interior side Yard 18 ' 20% , of lot ' width with a min. 7 ' for interior. side yard and 151. for exterior side yard. Exteriar Side Yard _ (8th . Street) 36 ' 0 story motel ) 5 ' (1416" high canopy) ' Rear Yard (alley) 2.5 ' ( first floor) 3 '. 2.5 ' ( 2nd . and 3rd. 0 ' (cantilevered floor ), stractures ) * Special` Permit 'request. Staff Report - 7j2j85 3 ; �,� ' (2780d ) , .. .. C./ ., ., r•. - ;.'Upper .story (3xd. `"floor e 10 �.:. tba ackfrom 2nd. floor ). Parking 581 (37 standa*rd and 21 compact sized f Build 'n orientation; archikecture andy,.landa'cape "design of °the y have :. rtet �nedVthatetheeviewed by the Desi n Revfew IIYa;rd. 'The' ; pro: ,. , g pr'644ect integrate harmonioual into ,the character '� and design of; the? immediate and future neighborhood , conforms . to,, the : ! q Y P 4 d,-''that - mQditerranean theme re aired, b� .: ttie Downtown S ecific Plan the design enhances the desireability of the 'area ., A ` total of:�58 park , P v .� e s agt ing spaces,:.are ; rovideds six $paces at tads s aces _ ! P P. .space I within ,:a subterranean a'rkin area . Entrance to . subterranean visitors,r. , n 52. for� cu�tomer ;check in par os9s and short , term .,Park ing is off ,'lthe alley; all '.subterranean `parking .will- be by valet only. Circulation in the subterranean parking area is poor because of four dead end drives . Staff is recommending that this area be redesigned to create a continuous loop driveway system. The applicant has requested a Special Permit for three deviations from the Downtown Specific Plan development regulations - as follows : 1. To allow a .canopy to encroach 10 feet into the required 1.5 foot .' exterior side yard setback : (Section 4 . 3. 07) 2. To permit a reduction in required drive aisle ,widths from 27 feet to 25 feet-6 -inches . (Article 979 ) ' 3 . To permit t, reduction in required driveway ramp access ''width from 24 feet to 18 feet (Article 979 and Public Works Requirenent ) .,o a ,croachmentaisounobtrusive be,.ause it , is only ,one.three. or Staff . rec6mmends a ems one and two but not item. The canopy n � y story , A 25 foot-6 inch�drives'a�islee�hances the main entrance tq, the :"motel . and opera on t , is sufficient for t:he subterranean parking area since it will be primarily valet packing.; Staff feels the, IS foot wide 'ramp is inadequate for proper maneuverability at the transitional points at either end of the ramp and recommends that the ramp be widened to 24 feet. The Department of Public Works has expressedconcerns regarding the northerly driveway approaich on 8th . Street and the access ramp width . They are requiring the southerly drive' approach on 8th. Street to 'be a minimum of 27 feet wide, the elimination of the northern approach , and a 25 foot wide driveway connect:ing, t:he southerly 8th . Street drive approach with the alley For better on-site circulation twee attached) . Also, they are recommending a minimum 24 foot wide accese ramp, in order to comply with these recommended changes a revised layout is necessary which will result Staff Report, 7/2/05 --4- (2780d ) "1 3 loss of 4 parkfng ':spacta . . However :this;: will kie :of,fset b the t Y. etr,aet Arkain9, u tthehentranceadrivewawscanon ' S}ham increase of on , pie :> Street. at_ the ;alley. ,•IW ddi: i ,. y ' . eccon .. . modate :four '�stack�ed loading spaces . There,;;are ,.thret .','primary. ,iusea and parcels fronting Pacific C'craat . •� vacantet isn:d 9th . ;St, - 1, 1 'a j P Highway;'between 8th . . reetr wh_ich.'.is "currently , , an. oil operatianhon. a 5Ocfoot widey Stre er r parcel , and a ,Taco,.-Bell ,restaurant. Approval of tithe .motel. w' ill •,leave the 50 foot wide;,parcel .`is'olated a'nd substandard in `size ( Section , 4 . 3, 02) . The applicant has . indicated . that he intends to ,;+eventually acquire ' the parcel and .integrate it .with' ,the rt motel use; ttiuk it is presently econbmically infeasible. - Future incorporation of: the p j nt ..restaurant use for parking,or�building ,. expansioh"would be workable . Staff :irs recommending that the applicant be required to acquire the. adjacent lot and, present , a;.conceptual ' plan of all . parcels for review by,;the Deve' lopment ' Services Department prior to • the issuance of,.building per it'S., If , .afterisaking an honest offer to purchase the .adjacent unable to consumate acquisition , this request shall 'lie referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. Overall , the 'development complies with the intent, and purpose of the ' Downtown Specific Plan . The motel .use .in buffered from. residential uses by an =lcorridoretolthesocean�l tYt buenagninrwellcwithht view, ai pt and a he 9, an theme of the , Downtown Downtow proposed Deed riediterrane n area and is 'in , close proximity to gain Street and the pier . 74, 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff , recommends that the Planning Commission grant the' Special Permit `for items 1 and 2 and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26 and Coastal Development , Permit No . ®5-11 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: :FINDINGS FOP. SPECIAL PERMIT rTFMS - 1 AND, 2 1. The encroachment of the single story, unenclosed canopy up to 5 , feet of the, exterior side property line is unobtrusivr- 'and enhances the main entrance of the building. 2.' A reduction of the drive aisle widths from 27 feet to .25 feet-6 inches is accephable wince it pertains to the subterranean parking structure which is used for valet parking only. 3 . The proposed deviations will not he detrimental to the general health , welfare , safety and convenience of the neighborhood oc City in general , nor -injurious to the value of adjacent properties. 4 . The project is consistent with objectives of the ,Downtown Specific Plan ,in achieving a development adopted 'to the natural land features and compatible with the surrounding environment. ata€.f Report 7/2/85 "5.. ..( 2780d ) i ZY.r�..,..... .... . M/•Y..YT�.T►T ti. r.y lrMA ,.u• Y`.•�.n/. • .wMr. ... • rn/�-r r...++._ ,FINDINGS" FOR . COI�STJ�L D-EVELOPMENT�'PERMIT',�NO •',.85 1�1: i , 1. The 'proposed ;52-un t,fJnot�el;aie cons ia.tent with e, Zone :F�ufftx a�ndthe �own�town, S ,r, , . peecific ' Plan,';Distgict 1';stawell as - ,I except: a ., . s, rovided for., in ,-rhe �. 6 ecial P ak as p Perm re ue other piovisiurts' of 11th'e Iuntington Seach� Ordinance ;Code t: applicable to the. popertys and contorms with the 'plans, policies, xe'quirements and ntandards of :' th'e city's Coaistal Land Use Phan 2. The proposed :developm ent conforms'rwith the . public access an p l.'ion, ;polici ", of chapter . 3 ,of the .Cali'focnia . . Act. - Adequate public .access to, the 'bench is:,provided:. on ': • .Coastal�ecrea,, c CoaBt Highways and building layoutn'd desi � ntoptimizes 'visual views to the ocean. 9 P • .3. Th`e pr'opased . development, can'beprovided with infras`t�ructure in, r' .a manner th'aE i.s : 1 _ " ' consistence with, the Coastal Land � Use` F1'a Existing-: underground,. sewer and water utilities ceet condalonitions `ofearerovalaar.e sufficientments atoahandleethen 1proeose PP P P d 'development. :. .FINDINGS FOR -CONDITIONAL .'USE PER MIT NO. " 85-26 1 . Th•e' proposed 52 unit motel will not have �a detrimental' etfect upon :, the general health, welfare, safety'.and r Conve' ni@nce :'off persons. residing: in the area , 'not `'upon ` the value `of the-pr*opert i within the vicinity. 2. The proposed 'use is compatible with ex.ist:ing, use , in the vicinity. . and 3. The,,proposed 'development is consistent with tihe " objectives of the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan.. . 4 . The property wae;:, previ'ousl studied for t,,his , intensity . of u's,e at . the time the Downtown Sp fi Pl in, 'zoning Ac ignation ' was plaed , , on the subject property. 5. The lunation , site layoute and design of . the proposed hotel ,use s does properly .adapt the proposed .three' story motel :atrttcture,' to i streets, driveways, and alleys, and uses in a hermonioous manner . y 6. Access to and parking for the proposed 'use will.-. not create undue traffic problems if designed as prescr3be'd in the attached conditions of approval . CONDITIONS Or APPROVAL CORbITIONAL USE PER -. MZT NO. 85-26: 1 . The site plan, floor plane, and elevations dated June. 6; 1985' shall be revised and submitted for review and approvxl , by . the Planning Director reflecting the following modifications : Staff Report ' ,-- 7/2/95 -6- i27COM , aAMA : The, aoutherly : drive approach.,,.on, :nth. 5tret ei�ill be a m t n mum 27 fee wide a d a • radius: ty `e the northecl do ive, a roach; sh'all b*, eliini�nated•s. and ai, 25. foot Kide on=aite;' dr`ivew6y shslle,be :provided .between :•tbe' drive r: approach- and the alley jc . tt' b. 'IT he acceea ramp ,to.'-the. sU terranean parking shall be r; minimum 24`, feet in" width`. c. The :.undergro , 9 und-:patkin la.Y out 'shall be. revised to create a continuous loop system. d . Setback f i i . .• -et floor of structure 1 ,feet fromultimate rear property line. e . A. conceptual plan, showing the adjacent lot ' rolled' into this development. 2 . Valet parking shall be' utilized all year routnd. 3. A parcel map shall be submitted and recorded prior to , the issuance 'of building permits for -consolidating the existing 25 a foot Wide lots. 4`. The ap licaint shall make :,an 6Tfer to ac the . ad a 50 quire j. cent ,' - pp ,f foot wide lot and _integrate into tihe motel .-development,. ;If the applicant is • Unable L'to acquire this :parcels .a. letter of ; .offer, and :rejection shall be submitted to the :Department of . Development Services. 5. A detailed lands6aP a plan ands sprinkler , plan shall be in P P ., accordance with the Downtown ,,Landscape Guidelines, �,Ancluding ;.' the use of ;extensive berming in the front setback �'area alon►� Pacific g x• pproved '-b acific Coast si hwa and 'shall be submitted and a r.. the Development services and Public Works Departments prior to the • issuance of building permits . fie A materials :'pallet indicating f�tna� color choices U,tlue, building materials must be submitted for review ' and . a� proval by the Development Services Director prior to trhe '-isr�uance 'of ,building permits . 7. Proisions and are sub ect � to review and approval b the must be made to buffer the motel.. ,from the ad ace Fire and Development .Services Department. S . An , automaticsPrinkler , Y syste approved, by• the ?ire, Department shall he installed thro� „ the complex per N.F, P. A. STandard `13 . 'This system must be supervised-Oar Fire Department Standards. 9 . A wet standpipe system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed in the stairways and is .to cimply with (lnitorm Building Code Standards . StafV)Report ' - , 7/2/95 ..7�. x780d) l' , , t r ` 10. Ai►, alarm system approve by the' Fire Department shall be installed , throughout per Onif6iA- Pfre�-•Codes 'Standards. Y1 .? To ,'accormodate; the use of ,an ..;b0anc6 gurney; every floor ;r seirved'2by elevators shill hi,4e access .to, j at :least', one, <; elevator ..car havi.�ng, a ninimul, inside . car., platforr of - ssix . t 6 'feet ;by eight. (8 ) feet-' 'wi"de by ' foux .: (4 ) ' feet by,,i:hrec ,( � o 9 , (42) inches. sum': rltar o enir� width of fatty-two inches. deep wi th� a� minimum" , 12 . The,� ,.. water system must be u radeo 'provide , alf i ke f low , of ,. are 3,500 GPM. New fire hydrant's , ate to b ' .l approved by the 'Fire Department. 13 The stairwa enclosure on the so uth aide must -in 61lde a corridor on the ground floor leading from the, stairway,, to the exterior of 'the :buildin or the stairway can exit ',directl to , the south side exterior, g y x 14 . Two 'exits shall be required for the spa/lounge o n the roof .' deck . 15.' The .27-1/2 foot of alley dedication shall be paved- per, City Standards . The developer shall also pave the entire dedicekpd a11ey from 8th . Street to the northwesterl • y praperty; line. 16. The curb .-and ,gutter - along 8th . street 'shall' be .conitructed at 21D.5 f,.et from the centerline to, accommodate future p p• ar• parking when Bth . 'Street is cul e-eared. er endicul r 17. A 2 foot wide public utilities easement is required behind the sidewalk . 18. An 8 inch minimum water main shall be constructed in 8th. street . 19. A sewer main shall •,be constructed in 8th. 4,Street from' pacific Coast M.ghway, to the , orange County Sanitation ;Districr. 5ewer , Trunk 3n Walnut Avenue and connect at an approved loc.at,Ion . 20. Any abandoned, oil wells shall' be ';modified as required by' the Fire Department prior to the issuance of building` permits : 21 . Low volume heads -shall be used •'on all showers . other surplus or unusable n to a lumber , wire, pipe $nrl 22 . All buil'din s oils such as unusable p a ri is 'shall be diuFosed of at an off-site area equipped to handle them. 23. , Energy-efficient lighting 'shall be used in open space areas , .r; Staff Report - ,7/2/85 i (2780d p �,�f r •. 1 •ai' 1":�a ''�, rl is ;, ._, ,1"Nn Via_: *..,',, s ia!+�, •a. r+r �w+ , t .wf ,.S ,. �t'2� , l datailed aoila .anaiye`is. erall beprepAred by; R regaexed,;, ` J" ude° :oiisike �aa► lin ' incl p 9 'soils .engYneer . This '• n �y _ , .. ; and; lab0iitozy` testing of.4ateruls` provia+t detail recoa+mendatfons ,regarding 'gcading ��he: iical artd 'fuel propectlea , foundations, retaining wa:'ls, '�treetss'y and uti11ti'es � etc �5 .,, xhe 'Plann`ing Commit ion. 'r"eser"vea 'the�''righa to thhs r Condi•tional� qae , Pe'zit� if;'dny'!violati'ov of `'these' 'cor�:dit` ons o� , the,.- t ni g' tnn• Beach 6rdinance 'Code.-•occurs.,, , ATTACHMENTS• 'I r 2 . Site,,Plan floor plan.,and ei.evatfone 3. Revised S1te� Plan Y(Stiff recommendation a emit request 5 �eci 1 P r P - 5. Narrakive,; S. ' Alternative Action (to' be- submitted at -meeting) JWP:3 s la iLrl : - r , , I Staf f Repor (2760d) a - _ ., .F, , - ... a. .,. ..a+aU V- LI - 1,- '._ -- ,NaN i._ _ _ •,al : r' .1 A-0 rs •Vp q : w' 00 r L /f1 O t �f .'I• r, i r.......�arn ..*` x -W mom "1�1 .� - _ r r i �• i f '', - f r ter! _ f • ^-1. 3 -.. �� -e. � 'f 1 it � .f�"i'+ct wr %tr1► �� ��, ti. wJ w, �V •.,.. w• -.••i 1 �, i �� � �.• Nam: � • a �"�" s'fti'!�T fhV __ ,_ :•rrrrrA� Mn1w• All lot- Is Pis - - -s�wi Tl� +. �� •�si•1a�iini! � .t II � �, ♦q1 ri.i mi V fr•J 1 Iw•• •,•.S t... tf►it .-I 7 � r L w , �Y r 75 •rin r e;lr 4me"' , s JUNE 24. 1955 365 W GARVEY AVENUE.,.UM j63 t AIIONTEREY F/ K C/1lJFdR�1lll� 91754 _. . ARTMENT Q D'cEMC M INT SERVICES CITY OF.to TINGTON 5EACH '2DOO MAIN`STREET ` HUNTINGTON REACH. CA`0W . RE: QUALITY INN PROJECT, 600 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY.HUNTINGTON BEACk. DEAR PI.AM*AS: I AM WRITING THIS LETTER TO EXPLAIN THE VARIANCE OF WHICH THE(DUALITY INN PROJECT US IWOLVED mrd. NO INGRESS OR EG E DUE TO THE sil'11AT10N IN WHICH , , . . . . ' •: . SS IS ALLOwFD dY CITY PEt�JI.ATi0N5 ON , PACIFIC COAST Hl&H Ay.' WE HAVE DESIGNED A LOOP ORI%&ON THE`EIGkm AVENUJE SIDE t;'�Pf ' 6UILDING WITH A CANGPY IN CROER TO ENHANCE 1HE ENTRY OF THE 50ILDING.:SINCE THE SECOND AND THIRD.FL=S OF TK 501LDING vr�DESIGNED TO BE SET FORT4&R BACK FRgM THE STREET �CRDER TO PRESERVE TW OCEAN VIEWFROM,EIGHTH TH AVENI S A NECESSITY NO ONLY FOR AN INVITING ATMO"SPHEPE ANO TO IDENTIFY.PROPOSED OV-STO",CAAKIPY THE. ENTRANCE;TO THE CUILDING 5UT ALSO FOR rOM PROVISICN OF A SHADED AREA FOR GUEST ARRI- VALS AND TWf CCNVENIEN'CE OF VALET P&RKING. THE LIMERGROUNA GARAGE WAS DESIGNED SO AS TO Nor EXPOSE TK Wfr1Qt.E PARKiN6 AAA To THE PUBLIC AND.TO!'MAINTAIN 'A NICE SCENERY 04 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. IN PRW!DING THE CON- VENIENCE Of;VALETPARKING. THE I&.RAC TO M GARAGE FRM THE ALLEY AND W-B' BACK- AP AND I"AWUVER SPIKE IN THE THE LMRGROUNO GARAGE 15 MORE THAN SUFFICIENT FOR THE VALET ATTENDANT TO W= WFITH. WE APPRECIATE THE APPRWAL OF OUR PRGICT SY Tk1E DESIGN REVIEW SOARD. WE%010 LIKE TO COMMTE VATN_THE CITY AND CI , TY PLANNING STAFF TO CONTINUE TO Wd�lC OUT A. tSEAUTIftJt .•" ;: PROJECT W10i WDJW 5E IN SEEt.FIT FOR 50TH THE CITY AM THE ENVESTOR.,P" YqU, SINCEMY YMPS. .SV%ON LEE. AIA REPRf.SENTAnVE Cf APPLICANT M. NAI4 PATEL SY w NUNTUNGTON`Ban OEVEt op0(NT SENV*c-S P.O. Box ISO , LAW pW OWN 'o"wmC7l l l_ w • CONS?11tJC114N C +; i S 1, �-rRT, ' • � - c � ' � Huntington 'Beach has. been rer:ogn zed, as a beautiful . city ith `br�eathtakiR w q ocean vie ws and °a very long and extensive,, coast line. These and '`other fQatures have made Huntington - - t Beach a famous resort- for tourists tco -spend vacations and r ' weekends . The proposed project would' be able , to serve not only city and, surrounding area residents. but also .tourists and 'visitors of th'e Southern California urea by providing with ,canven"ient,' motel them` services. .. - nn. ,a "franc •• , .:. ` ,,. ,. Tlte: mote i is proposed a ��ua 1'i ty I hi4e known r or its `high` qual'Lty. The proposed Quality 'Tnn would be to cited 'on the vacant�:I' an"0i north at corner 'a: "Pacific , Coast highway and Eighth Avenue. Conceptual approval has { been granted �by ''the_Quality fn franehIs' a concerning location; ' site, and ' schematic' design. . . The 3-story motel project wa«ld ' provide 50 units of lodging with .ca' contempArary Madit@ F•AJlean , ecre theme ercyarchit requirements. ThQ driveway entrance would consist of a:'dr'ive loop combines! with a canopy., Under- j p - q er round nrking w a provided , '' g p f t.h valet par a �ice . wou id b with entrance through ..the allay. � The drivo loop• would be • lob, cated on Eighth A%►enue Oith na dr`iveway opening onto PAC i.fic Coast' Highway so as to not promote the traffic load -an P. C.li. ' The buildiri' +9 propoQti! to ',,be set , back 25' from Pacific Coast Highway,- and 34 ft. ` from Eighth Avenue ` in' ordir to reserve ,area , -for l,tsn s apin whic Would F d c g„ h u��1d provide a ire pieabing and greersui� , ,A view from ..the s'creet`. In response to the iQcat4n nrsd c i ima to o f the city, t.14e landscap`i n. g 'would 3 cludo :palm trees and other,:, t landsca a mAiirial , eub ect to stronq. prevailing winds. In, keep- P j in rianean theaser the buildinq would `'include g ` with the ,>Kedi to y Span iist- t1Le, roof, white textured stucco' walis, sachem, ' balco- Pies, bright-'accent argon el,amentE of, th• � aiwnin and other co .: .. e . oYder to promote a festive feeling, colorful. banners would be provided 'on the "canopy'. The in r •py terior of:' the •building • would include a lountain in the lobby, a' custom spa, 'an 'enclosed' ' deck wfth breathtaking ocean viers, and a ,n ayec�ithi,ng glas8 ele- vator with' a •180 degree view, overlooking: the ocean. Ai 1 , these ' 1 , features would irespond o enhance ihe` ci ty• ex ; - ' influentially t perx-.• `: 1 i The project is to be located in a comme'' cla,l., and residen- tial area along Pacific Coast Highway. On the east side of the i property across Eig � hth Avenue stands a<' mAtel j on the west side,, a restaurant; on the, north side -across fro:a the, alley, sport- , , me hside Coast Highway, a condo, nts 1 ' an • the gout across ' Pacific 1, development , along with the coastline. s!' This roposeil ' ro ect wii 1 `Pat only anhancee Pacficcra P P j st Highway b' rovid•iii a modern ualit lod in 9 y Y P 9 q Y 9 9 BerviGe �►hich people.` busineas, but a1an NiI1 progress , snwi11 attract and 'a ' promote prosperity , to the City of-Huntington Bear } , r, . . r , , t i,. s . 7A � 7/31%85 LARRY R • VASTERLING 1437 N SAPP_,I kGTON , GLEND A .E. 'Mn 3122 CITY 'CAUNCrI L CNfiMBER CIVIC -CENTER, - oa 2000 MAIN STREET NUNTINGtAN BEACH CA 92648 � 4 SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #85,-2 • ON aOLH 22 , I185 `�' RE CEO VGD f , ESrT1 t N ACr o� NAB P P URCr1 R S� Co 77� FIR t:I'E L F4 R Rp I�RT�f (toys 6 '7 .oN PC H a LoSC ) , TIE PART 5 (N VO L.V Eta M ' E NOCOO-TACT' C - _ �R I o R Co�JTAZT w ITS{ m E Co�s CERtwI r N� , A FER T- fi 64 LOSES L,c rP 5 Ri C THIS �'oNTR C'C dF SU ! l "' T.a� �' ME To EITHER SlgN 0R WkiTE IZ 3E,GTE-� ON 7K McFER. r CoUL�D N T, AGcen . Tvs OFF.. swce Ir RUt RE 5 80 70 oww' ER I~iNAN tlwq ) W.RUSE~ SUBTRACifN+q TH E t ks�7109 140TC )7hz� SALES COMM ISSIOOS f 20 fA TILE a��2iNC1 PRict O�' II �+ r+' ,. �,00 00� D o�.L�RS WOULD L.EA'� E - A BAL A>,1 CE 8� 1,4 ,POL ARS Irk ESCROW-w M Lt.ED Row AILD P11rrER9d1J: '7�f.1(e AqE i,j AND R5 kED g�fl a� ?"HE 8070 ;©ci�tJ A trD HE sRED 'mot R � �A W tPATCL WAs , 'A- M� ; ' �1•EANS AND CouLD N� A�o1�D_ 7� ,:,oFr=ER " MUCH Ac.So 'i�tG CpNTRACIF OFh,ERS ':.me . No , SCC.Upf "& • F A 1�2 A -r.ME THE BULf ENS? NEEzs REQ,Uhke Fti COULD SELF 'THE WELL AND ©R - TNt PkoP69'7Li 'S ,e-c ,iPTMbjr To RE~Coop - Nts bou;u VALt Mc- NTj -Auk frMEN . Qu rT CL R►M THC . PRQ �PERTH . T1�EN x wouLD NEED To. REPLACE „ 1 THE EQ% IP rmFNr To Res�'oRE: MA� RoPER1'�1 r , A to Wt t� I >✓ Ca 4b Co o P r R A TEE Gas t T�}j THS ?LR M N I U Cr Ctid�M s s5igW c�J -nflS /*nA7"�R .:fur r FEEL THAT � SHOULD N o i BE. REQ`t�i R Ssb To AccEpr Aw �,AZE Q U A*-e OPMQa RNA 1: '�JpUC� 8 OPPOSED TO `iil5 •5ilCci AL USE , Rgm IT, i � �.E�s �' WOULD r3E 1Y_?4 LIKE 7�shTtnE's'Jr �i-p �NR2LE n1� "7`0 'hV�LpPE fly PROPE�T� ++ t�Y 09PM4 . �v�V�-�. Llrwr - - ---_-- 'l: _ - + 7. , .. .---- --- — "-. n• p, '.i"{,9�'7 .r••o,: < r. i / tiv:,•.111�•xNhh�:�.:{'r.1:4 SnOKEA's COPY �� � , weat!ru+sacu►rnN a atKrcao s>;�►ro�+o fow ; REAL ESTATE PURCHAS CONTRACT CfEl MMIS MORE THAN A RECEIrT FOR MONEI'.fT is IMNO DTO BE A 4WD`RECE10t,'F001- - •f..EfiAILY 61NOINti CON'f11APT.I"tEJU0 IT CAREFULLY.: .. y .6.ntin4toyn Beach July, 17, >* ,85 Nan .---r California. , fieceived trans a t t' ry�,;c herein calledBuyer, thesuitio one Thousand and `1t0/�OQ-'•---'_ «r DdlarYS * OO�: dO**, evldeuced by ash Q;cashier's check Cl,or t�,personal Check M .po' aW to A-;'CA I if.OM I Al TWO,/-'�-.-�t�._,.�n..._�+p to be h ld mcashed until acceptance of.,his offer"es deposit on a=ount of urchme prtca of ` JL...�.�Lw.di� Thg ' �.�r�r��.+..r rr w�.wr r..«.- s r w�r'r«w .oilartl • ** 00 *t for the purchase of property,situated in' 1�.ILllf ir,Sfnr...QEaS ........ Count of Y- ,• � IIifarts;a ,.. described as follows: __Exact�escr� �on in scrollL'o, s„ 6 "b l: Ea,;jfi �Qi Hl9hrr�y'betw, ten '8ttt b 7t�i� �. ll�ot�.as.ce�►_tance of t�,iS.:,off�rG` buver�i 11-�1� "ri�4.: sC�C4.hf n Th,�Qus tad the e�Dol rrtt„e price as ioliaw�:, 1 Buyer will d st n esc w with :' ant 0 Q. tars as Good Eai t1zMo y to g_ Q toNa d the`'Purchase Pric.e gf Twa_ Hmgdrgd_ ThgysA ILd Q217aEgs . .?,Prior to the clots:of ESQ ef.._Buy�r�e�ll�li .Andditjglr Shine -King Itmusand QQ1_1 ..,rj�... fn_th..E,se w m r. rmpnt :20% of the Eur ac prjce. 3 SO1Qr is to carry hsk„ a ist rt,cthiod in the dmi3unt of ana Hundred Sixty 'thousand Qoliar5 at 10% intarp__qt m( rf jz6d`Qi im ' ��'iod of thirty year$'. all dot e- and'plYabl a Sr,} 10 year; . „r - _.�__ Wi tb P',, nf SI L11 par month and one balloon h=ent of 11 SQ m at teas end of ld Ypars wi tb nn ;are-n,�ay nt nena 1 iY, I ur_chaie Wag Is to Include both Qi1 w0lls-�Phe_PradUCfbga,R:dxjmdeelY 3.j Q11s per:day" and 'an Wel1 1 -mall surface--rights-And au mideral rights,.. ii res i n fig. daxs_nr as, of 7129/85 and is continent 'Lpan the Sel l er' h Mr. Moody canc hiir mrm with Al mi tas Fr-crow an Sat forth above any terms and conditions of a factual nature applicable to this sale. such as finar►=irtn, pritx self of ottw.property, ttw' mutter of structural pest control inspection, repairs and Pormial property to be irtduded in the We. 2. Deposit will © will not 13 be increased by S ._ to S within.._ days of &meptance of this offer. 3. Buyer doer C7 does not Od intend to occupy subject property as his residence. 4. The supplements initialed below are immPorated It% part of this agreement_ other Structural matt Control COT116calian Al•Nrnrtrtt .Aetwit ant -.rr. ..�.... ... special Studi" zontr oluaotun -VA 9L."ndm--on1 ...._,..._.�.. Flood InwrViC6 Dir001%119 _.FHA Amr4orsrnent .�. ...... 5. Eluyer and Seller acknowiedge receipt of a copy of this page.which constitutes Page I ot-I—Paips. xw�rr4 i4 X 4 4" A ArEAL ES-1AIE PROr1EA 11 IHE f"ERION IDUA1.111Eri TO ADVISIE ON HEAL EATATI.IF YOU tKSIAE LIELIAL ADVICE CONSULT YOUR AT'TOANEir, ♦stt5 S,tAwo&Rs1ED E$MMENY FOA IISE IN SI)JPLETRAN6A" NS HAS BEEN APPROW-0 fly THE CALWORNIAASSOCATION dF pEAIV09 ANID THE STATE.UAct OF CALIFORNtA INFORM ONLY NO AEPREVtN tION IS(MADE As reTHE APPROVALOr,THE FORM OF 04MLCMENTS I►.E t.ECtAt. VALIDIT/ OF ArjY PROVISION, Gil TIME ADEOUACY OF A►+1 VROVISION IN "AY SPECIFVC TRANSACYtOri IT SHOULt3 NOT BE USED iN CC)mpLEX TRANSACTIONS OR WITH EXTENSIVE RIDERS OR ADDITIONS . } i l3ROKEA'fi C PY ESTATE PUR REAL ..r ASE CONTR a�i DEPOSIT , ` The following terms and conditions are herebyineorporawl In end made 'pi' t of ftytrr's Offer 6, Buyer and Seller shalt dellr signed instructions to the escrow holder within:__.., IQ drys from Seller's alm"tmce which shall provide for closing within— days froni Seller's acxeptsnce. Esctovv fees to bi'paid as 1o11ovK: `Ad m&Uuy_er/Se11er 1'sCt•[1W, EBCb:. Q nay his_ Main t sts— 7, ' Title ii to be Iree of liens,encumbrances;easefmmts, restrictions, rights and conditiorts of record or knewn to Seiler, other t.*utn the following: (11 Current property taxes, 12) covansnIs, conditions,'re'strinions, and public utility easements of retord,',if any, provided the same do not advetstly affect the continued use of the propoetty for the purposes' for i*hich it is prescnify being used; unless rrziesonably y . disapproved by Buyer in writsng'wiithin....?0 iliys of receipt of a current preltminas title re furnished ai �el.��rs s expense, and 13) ll 1St- w' aCAftL�-t@ ComWny, shawl z�ubjett only t`Larx:: : Title Association .'policy .issued - by Uilornia er shall nts11;". Buyer at ,$rill rs c,�title erased int$u end _ , Lr pe y o the above:'If Seiler 11 l is unwilling or uaablt to may terminate title s agreement.d�sa, �t>yM Buyer as above, Seller may tertnna this a eerrsent, or,(2) tails to deriver lisle as above, Bayer cumin �p by y gr to either case, the deposit shall be returned to Buyer. B. Property taxes, premiums on insurance acceptable to Buyer, rents,interett,and___D 1 oyf Mil( ;: :hall be prorated as o1 ta) the date of-recordation of deed:or (b) A_C11 a _DLY-Saaw ._.. Any bond or assessment which is a lien shalt be by 1" shall pay cost of transfer taxes,if any. atraw� 9. Possession shall be delivered to Buyer(a)on close of escrow, alb} ". +rser-thtrr=-----•---»-----drys altar close of escrow or(c) ib, Unless otherwise designated in the escrow instructions of Buyer, title shall vest as follows:Tn Ap Detprviined in fse-roww (The manner of taking title may have significant legal and tax Consequences. Therefore,give this matter ierious consideration,) It. if Broker is a part,tipant of a Board multiple listing service i MLS I. the Broker is authorized to report the sale, its(price. terms, and financing for.the information. publication,disseminations, and use of the authcvited Board members. 12-eieased'f Buyir fails from'his oblitotioncomplete o�sesl said purchase: to Buas ffin er and m d by proctso�rt of any,ifti t B�eruut on Bany�f t+��ior re shall med ' 9a Pr perty y ay against nl upon Y 1;n y which he' may have: in law.'or erluity' prarrided, however, that by'piacing their initials Mete Buyer: ( jSeller. ( ) agteee that Seiler shall retain the deposit as his liquidated damages. If;the described property Is a d with no morel than four units, one of which the Buyer intends to occupy es hit resit3anoe, Seller shall'retain is liqui damages the deposit actually paid,or an amount therefrom, not tit•ore than'3% of the purchae price and promptly return any excess to Buyer. 13. 1f the only controversy or claim between the rarties arises out of at relates to Use disposition nt the Buyet's deposit, such controversy or claim shall at the election of the parties be decided by arbitration. Such atbitr'ation shall be determined in Accordanoe with the Rules of the American Arbilration Association, and Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrators) may be enter"in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 120105 shall Im applicable to such arbitratiion. 14. In any action or proceedinga.isingoutcf this agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled toseasonableattorney's teas andcosts. 15, Time is of the essence. All modiftcationt or extensions shall be in writing signed by ttie patties.. 16. This constitute) an offer to purchase the described property.Unless acceptance is signed by Seller and the signed copy de)1ve►ed to Oil yet. in-verson or by mail to th ress below, within, .1Q,,,,,...,_._,days, this offer shall be deemed revoked and the deposit shall W retu . Buye acknow script of copy,hereof. By, 7/29/85 , me 1 Estate oker S�Arties Buyer .. . � B n r kleach Address Q Address Tetcphustie-�7� w �.---- Telephone .._..�._�, ACCEPTANCE 'The undersigned Sell et accepts and agrees is sell the property on the above term¢grid conditions. Seller has employed.,.Maj r- P eriie5 r.-rw asBroker(tlindagrerslopay fair services the susnof T�rP_1.YE..Iht3usa add--d ell no 1100.,wrrw.,rr_r__ww-r_ Do11,rt (S **l 2 B00d *e* —). payable as follows: (a)On recordation of the deed or other evidence of title,or(b)if completic rt of We is ptevenitd by default of Seller,upon Seller's default or(c) if cornolttion of tale is prevented by default of Buyer, only if and when Seller collects damages train Buyer,bytult orbthervviie and then In an arnount not less than ona•half of the damages recovered, but not to emceed the above fee, after first deducting title and escrow expens he e-menses of collection, if any to any action between Bruket rind Seller .`arising out of this rrpcement, the Prevailing party than be P. to reasonable Ftlorrwy's fees and costs.Tha unden'tgntdacknoWedgm receipt of a copy and authorizes Brokers)to deliver a signed copy to B uytr. Dated: Telephone ._.. Seller 'Addrtss._.. .w„r... ....__...,...... Selhr 81roket6l'ag"M to the foregoing, Broker..........-..- Broker-' , Dated,..._...,..._......».r.8v....... ..._.,.....» Dated;: ::.�.......w _Bv...„�......_. . CONDITIONS OF APPkOVA`L: A11 Conditions :af Appc6 al -or Conditional Used Permit 'No. •83_xl and ' Tentative Tract No. 11417 C13evtsed ) " rha] 1 `rehiairi . f 0ffec.': . , .. ,,- , �,. ,, . :. _ '. .ate '• ., ., 2 . e pro�'ect.,.shall .be . sut�ject to Gt�crent park and ire eat-ion f ' s (Resolution No, , 5072 ) , A--3 Gene 4 -plan , Conformi ty 85:.4 AppIi 'fit: Public Works Request, ' Street =vacation of Los Patos bekwe Sima �a, Lynn Streets A-4 General'.;Plan on' formity 85-5 . RepuesEn 'Street �ccation north sid of M - lic ' g cFadden Avenue` west Of the 405 ' Freeway. , -�A MOTION WAS - MADE BY ERSKI AND SE ND BY: MIRJAHANG1R. TO APPROVE .GENERAL ,`PLAN. CONFORMITY 85- AND V ERAL PLAN' -CONFORMITY 85--5 BY THE , FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: ' ?Rowe,, Schumacher ' L - engood, Erskine, Mi'rjahangir NOES: None ABSENT: winchell , Po r er s AASTAIN: None POTION PASSED ✓ a. ORAL COMMUNIC FIONS AND COMMISSION ITEMS: R , e u sI d that the Commission discuss. ywoo "Palm CourC" , •Ton ..any neri , re resentin 8WC/Vander ingth Jul 2 1985 Planning Commission Meeti.nhe co itrega set forth � Y , g regard. - con'r tions number 20 S 29 . He also wanted to re iew ' Conditions I�t of pproval for Conditional Use;Permit No. 85-�2 n ber:' ( la ) rporated into (lad : an s sting that , ( l f ) ..should be �inco • ,S l terratite. The Commission ' requested staff to revie the �► tapes before this item is brought , before th•e City . Coun 1 , to reflect the true intent of the Planning Commission.. 1 ITEMS FOR PUBLIC HEARING C•-1 CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT 140. 85-26/CQASTAL DEVELOPMENT FERMIT ' NO gS-11 If Appl scan t : Nan Patel At . the . Plann�.�g Commias ion meeting of . J41y 2 , 1985, ,the Commission continued Coiiditi'onal Use Permit No. 55-26', a request `to conistiuct a i 52-unit motel with a Spectal hermit, and requested that Vhe applicant subit a revised plan showing . the driveway xaMe to the aubterranean :parking with _access from 8th Street - instead .tip€ the alley", and pr4ovide addi.'tional information regarding =the feitsibil'ity ` 4 a co nsozidating ' and integr Ling the adjacent 50 .foot tilde "1ot • with the motel development Pat . r as 'reviewed tithe' revi8ed ` planandr feels ,itis .now ,a_. morent site �layout� of circulation, and structure de'si.gn,. The, L .. r. - r su rking lids ;been .`r' sed to provide a loop system ,for �betterrcircul�rion ; Inte'nse landscaping his being.;,r,ecommended in` the _ ront'.Setback because ' the: ramp ,encroachment eliminaited a; poi tio 'o n f the' iront land scape,d',area :- The. Public Works. Department •reviewed the y I • r'evised :plan! and recommends approval." THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED . .on nPattinson, i-Deyelop'ment ,Consult'ant. hired 'by. Mr: Pia'tel , siiteo he He'.� �.the a lic.ant concurred wilt Planning. Coimrni.ssioh , Meeting . said"- �as„not .available to attend .thee .la pp . . th all the conditions except �.'condi`t.ion no. 41, which r'equesta the applicant to ,'makek an:'affort to consolidate the. hotel development with the adjacent 50 ; foot lot , He - further: indicated , that`- Mr.- Patel is notable to aLCfozd , this property. Mr . Pattinson said he had contacted the cwner;, of' the property, Mr . Vasterline, to make 'an offer on , the ; pioperty. , Mr . Vasterline . proposed a price of $380, 000 . Mr . Pattinson 'made 'Mr . Vasterline' an offer of $200, 000 which Mr Vasterline , rejecte'd. Simon Lee , architect , spoke in support of the project. fie supports the changes staff had recommended. Mr. Vast Mr , atter�line, owner of, the adjacent ``50 foot lot, in ` respondinq to inson said the matter of the price of the property was up for negotiation . He commented on the two oil wells Iocated on the property stating that one of them was able to be pit into production . .He stated that his intentions are to reactivate ,the; l Well,*,,, He requested that if this project is' approved , a mutual Karp between his property and the project proposed be developed for i future development of his 50 foot lot. Commissioner:. Porter asked ' Mr . Vasterline about the oil . well production on his property . Has he any type of an agreement with an oil well company to put the wells back into production . Mr .. Vasterline stated no, but has 100% of the mineral rights 'to the property. There : wer.e no ,other persons to speak for or against the .°proposal and the public hearing was closed. comnissioner 'Ersklne quiried staff in regards to mr . Pattinson' s testimony, should the offer made to Mr. Vaster1irse for -the purchase, of his property be , submitted in written form. Bob; Sangster responded, that sot:e kind of, document in. writing would be 'better for negotiation. Commi sioner Schumacher asked what if the property owner never responded to an offer, concluding there would be no way for the aEplI.cant to respond to the condition . SAw. ; * b p`.c. - 7r 1'6--85 -3- i29474d The : Commiss ton ssed' requ i r ing a. `tiuie discu I i ne within which 'to`make r •- not be 'forced to. respond. Chairman Liveng • stated, that a h'a,t a,- and return: an. offer Commissioner Schumacher and . suggester3 tha 4 a number, of days stioul'd be given, for a :response and .if, 'there `14 none let the' project stand as submitted. . �. Commissioner Rowe:•.,aai•d there .sho'Uid tie .a s-trong effort -to consolidate the ..parcels. He stated condition `No.- 4 should atand as a ,:-condIti66 'of approval . Commissioner Porter• stated that he liked the., project but; not the fact.- that it leaves a sitbsLandard and undevelopable lot . Fe agreed the two lots' should be -'consolidated. Commissioner Miir 'ahangir aisagreed, stating that the. applicant should not be ; forces] to buy this expensive piece of property . Chairman Ltv6ngood stated that condition- was fair ,to .both ,the applicant ,and the owner of the 50 foot parcel. He 'suggested that. ` condition- No. 4 . be reworded to require an offer of',a -lair price. and iL • the seller does not take the offer to le'. the �rpiicint go ahead and build. Commissioner Schumacher suggested that . Mr ,.. 7asterl ine and the: .. applicant get together to come to an agreert4nt, Commissioner Erskine agreed with Commissioner Schur.iacher , but ad.:ed w that unless a written offer is required ' and the Commission receives evidence of what that offer was, the Commission does not have any t basis- upon which to decide. He added the item should either be denied - or continued until such has been provided .. .Commissioner Schumacher agreed to continuL- to give the a li.cant 9 9 pP time to make an offer . She also felt the.. lute should be . consolidated. Attorney Sangster stated that if this item is continued the applicant should come back with all documents "regarding escrows dealing with this lot. A MOTION WAS MADE BY ERSK I NE AND SECOND BY PORTER TO COr XINUE .CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-25/COASTAL DEVftOPMENT PEI'MIT. Noy , 85-11 ` TO THE AUGUST 5 , 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION 'MEETING 'HY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Rowe, Schumacher , Livergood , Erskine , Porter, Mirjahangi.r NOES: None ABSENT: winchell ABSTAIN: !tone ; MOTION PASSED ; , A': ON: .WAS, MADE BY WIN . ; CHELL ,14ND ::SECOND BY E1tSK I NE TO C011 ' E CON TI0NAL':0SE •PERMIT WO.;, 05-29 ' PER ,THE-,APPLICANT S"REQUE S TO THE JUGY ► 5 PLRNt+I C MEETING `BY T E F LL 11COTE ' . -r x vengc�od , Ersk i '. .. 'We Winchell Schumacher -AYES. {}n , , er �i 1Kr jahangir 110EG None ` ,ABSENT: For ter 'ABSTAIN: one s` MOTION PASSED • TENT : . , 85=TATIVF,. RACT ;MAP N0. - 8g--lli0/CONCIT7 11AI, CXCEPR�IOt1 N0. ~` ` 12f NEGATIVE•• C-- /COAS L;; DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ti0. ' DECLARATION 85-33 , A�licant : Te and `01ga Stavros , e a 'Vand' - � T nt t e' Parcel a 1 a d� l tl vie e' t a .m M N -$�-11 0 uasta a 10 -gym n P r it •tea o n . P P - ' c' 85 12 . i... a request to divide a 24_ 1 � square fool (79 .06,., x.��05. 10 ? ., q �. q : 1ot on :the east side of Si Stree approximately 350 feet north . of • Los ' Patos Avenue into two pa eels ithin the coastal zone Conditional cpept:ion 116. 85- s a request to pe*in t each of . the two lots.; to. ii-ave less than : the nimum 6.0 'feet of street Erisntage: : (Sec. 9102 .,2 ) ; one has 59.06' eet of frontage and the other has 20 feet. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS ENED John Lurcher,, repres � tine the applLcant , spoke in support . of the . project . He stated hat the project complied with the genera! `land use . There were no •o er persons to speak for or aq rat- the pr6`posal and the public he my was ;:losed. •I A' MOTION WA ' MADE BY WINCHET.i. AND SECOND 8Y POWE TO PPROVk; TENTATIVE ARCE:L MAP NO . 84_1210f,CONDITrORA1, EXCE PT10 00. . ` 85--17/C0 TAL DEVELOPMENT PERNJT 110. 85-1 .2/NEiGAT1VE DF. ARATION NO. 85--33 W R. CONA7TYONS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTF: • owe Wi t�c e L va o d k i a' 'AYES: R h Il i n u Ers in" a 1� r ah n r . • . 4 r . .t 9 NC1E done AB NT: Porter - Schumacher. out of , the room '. A TAI N: 'None � OTI.ON PASSED C-6 CONAITrONAL USE PERMIT 140. 85--161C►�ASTAh DEVELOPMENT P-RHI`i No. Al Ii .:a'nt :, Nan Patel Conditional Uie Parmit' 'No' . 85�26 -in conj�mncti.on wit�n a Spacial Permit, and Canstai Deve, opment• Permnit' tto. '85-11 IF, �.. .[ 1 a�id 's, uariora 'on �.& 0 .43 net: acre vacant �g i �� { develop a. ;threeyator 52-unit r�otel. i' Iudi �� mane Or s �1nit and 1 ; mn y PC July 2 , 19�5 -•16859d } corner of Pacific Coast Highway and 8th Street . The Special Permit ARA request is to allow the encroachment of a canopy with Bvpport columns 10 feet into the required 15 feet exterior side yard setback from 9th. Street , foc an 18 foot wide drive ramp in .lieu of the required 24 foot width requirement , and for 25 feet-6 inches wide ' driveway aisles in lieu of the required 27 foot wide requirement . The proposed motel project is exempt from environmental review because il' is in conformance with the Downtown Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Tact . Commissioner Schumacher stated that she does not like the method used for access to the parking area . She asked if it was possible to design the ingress,/egress to be on the same side of Lite canopy. Scott Ness of staff stated that access off Pacific Coast Highway is ►' not allowed. Commissioner Schumacher asked about 8th Street. . She stated that she felt the alley is a buffer for residential . Mike Adams of staff stated that it can be designed that way, but will lose a portion of the landscape buffer in front. If the .appl.icant keeps the plan of parking in the rear , we will preserve the E landscaping cn Pacific Coast Highway. ' Commissioner Schumacher l stated that she- would like to see plans with access off &th Street ., THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Xen Moody, former owner of the property, spoke in support of the project . Michael Thompson , owner of the property behind the project , stated I ? that he likes the design but is opposed to the access through the alley . Margaret Wilson stated that she liked the design of the project and feels it will enhance the area . Site stated concern , however , to the , access oft' the alley. , j Pat Standby spoke in total support of the project . 4 Simon Lee , project archettct , spoke in support of the project stating concern aoout the conditions of approval of the Conditional >, Use .Permit 85-26 No. 1 letter (b ) reguesting that it be only 18. feet . lie also stated concern for condition no. 1 (c ) stating that a valet will be handling all parking for this -area , .end no. 4 stating that the property owner is requesting too high a price for the lard. 6 _ ; Garry wastil spoke in opposition of the project stALtng that the s idea of the Downtown Specific Plan was to consolidate all of_, the . parcels. There were no other persona to speak for or bgainst the ,proposal and 4he public hearing was clused. i Simon Lee , archetect, stated' that he was still opposed to Conditlon 4 . PC July 2 ,, 1985 -17- (2859d) Commissioner Erskine stated that he felt the project was very beautiful but, added , that it violated the Intent of the specific plan in regards to consolidating all lots along Pacific Coast Highway. �" He stated that condition no. 4 should be enforced because the extra 50 foot, lot next door would eliminate the driveway and turning radius pr'obl,em, Commissioner Mirjahangir stated that maybe there were too many units on the site . He suggested eliminating some of the units to solve the parking and traffic circulation concerns . i Commissioner Schumacher stated that she would like to see the adjacent 50 foot parcel incorporated into the project . She states: that she also did not like to see the applicant held back because • the adjacent property owner is asking to high a price for the parcel . She stated that she liked the plan but feels there will be trouble with the traffic and parking problem. The Commission requested that this item be continued due to concerns with the parking, access to ..the project ' s parking, and the consolidation of the adjacent .0 foot lot . A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY ERSKINE TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE FERMI NO. 85-26/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 110. 85-11 TO THE JULY 16 , 1985 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING BY THE FOLL01iING VOTE: AYES: Rowe , Winchell , Schumacher , Give:ngood, Erskine, M i r iahang i t NOES: None ABSENT: Porter { ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED t C--7 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12410/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85-2G/NEG&TIVE DECLARATION NO. 85-18 ' A nt: Casa Linda Development Co. .,,P E Tentative Tract. No . , i`�1 cor►juncti Conditional Use { Permit No. 85 -20 and Negat ecl on No. 85-18 , , 'is a request t for . a one for subdivision on acre site for the pbrpoae of constructing 20 airspace nhomes. applicant is seeking two special permit, reque for the deve.Iopme of the project : reduction in . tur g radiuf, from 25 feet to eet (Section 9791d ) , . and reductio building oeparation for units s by, side from 2a feet to 1 .eet (Section 9362. 7d) . 3 I 2 PC July t2859d) j 1! Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX t90 CALIFORNIA 92646 Date : • NOTICE OF ACTION. Applicants NAN PA TEL 319.1 GARDEn GROVE BLVD , GATMEN Giwvt ,92641 Subject : COND I T IOUAL USE PE1011 'r ti0 8S-76 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PEP111 T N01 35-11 , Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on ------AUGVAZ-7. .1Q25 and your request was •,_ Withdrawn Approved f Approved with Conditions w� (See Attached ) .� Disapproved ' Tabled j Continued until Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the Actions and groands by acd upon which the applicant or interested party deems 'himself aggrieved . Said appeal :rust be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred And sixty-five ($165 ) dollars and be submitted to the City Clerk ' s office within ten ( 10 ) days of the date of the Commisrsio:l ' s section . in your case , the last day for filing an appeal and paying the f iling fee is l�llnn^, L liar Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. are such that any application becomes null and void , one ( L ) year after final approval, unless actual constructior+ }:as started i f Very truly yours , James W. Palin, Secretary j. APa i unttn ton Beach Planning Cotnntission' j P.O. Box ISO CALIFORNIA 132643 Y. •LiC.t� AugUs t 61 1985 Nan Patel 0791 Garuen Grove Blvd. •� Garden Grove , CA 92641 SUBJE%:T CONDITIONAL USE F'FRI.11T NG. 85-26/COASTAL MNELOPME:2T PERMIT V0. 05-11 REQUEST: To permit construction of a 52--unit riotel with •a special permit request for encroachment of a canopy 10 ' JnGo the c;:gui reci. 15 ► enter for side yard setback and :for" a reduction in drive aisle widths . LOCATION: 800 Pacific Coast Hwy. ( nor these;t earner of 110, and Gth . Street ) FIlMINGS i'M? SPF?C:AL Pf:VV- 11' 171117I S 1 AND 2 : 1 . The encroar_hrient of the single story , unenr:l .sed canopy up to 5 C eet, of the exterior s ido prop-er ty line is unobtrusive and enhances the train entrance or ti,e building. • 2. A reduction of the c.r ive gaisle widths from 27 feet to 25 feet-6 inches is. acceptable since i!: I -. : r.,ains to the subterranean parking structure which in used for valet parsing only. 3 . tine proposed deviations will not be det r izental to t1he general _ health , welfare , asiety and convenience of the neighborhood or City in general , nor injurious to the value of adjacent properties . . 4 . The proiecL is consistent wiL-h ubjectivec of. the Downtown ': ' Specific Plan in achieving a development adopted , to the natnrali .land features and compatible with the s:urrsjunding • enviranPA'!11t . �. N • • i AfA • � w FINDINGS' FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PEPMIT 110• 85-1 i 1 . The proposed 52-unit hotel is consistent with the City 's Coastal zone suffix and the Downtown Specific Plan District l standards , except as provided for in the Special Permit request , as well as other provisions of the tfuntin(iton Beach Ordigt7nce Code applicable to the property; and c,.M -rins with the � ans , policies , requ ire�ents and standards of Ue Ci.ty 's Coastal Land Use Plan . 2 . Th(: proposed development conforms with the public access and ' public. recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Ca'I ifornia Coastal Act . Adequate public access to the beach is provided on 8t:h'. Street and Pacific Coast Highway ; and building layout and design optimizes v.; :,ual views to the ocean. . 3 . The proposed development can be provided with inf.rastructut in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan - Existing underground sewer and water utilities ?-- 8th . Street alonS with the required improver),?nts as dq,-e.rib't-'.i in ' t;,e condition, of approval are sufficient to hand'3e the proposed development . `r FINDINGS FOR, C(RIDI1 T:3i AI, USE PEF111T 140. 65-26 : I . The proposed 52 unit r.otel will not have a detrimental effect upon the general hea t ) , ue ! fare, safety and convenience of persons residing in the area , not upon the value of the property within the vicinity . 2 . 'Phi? proposed use is compatible with exi tins use in the vicinity . r • - t '- 3 . The E)rol)csea development is cons i ,tent wiLh the goals and objt)ctive.. of the General Plan and Downtown Specific I-,Ian. 4 . 'shy.: property wan previously stuai ed for this inLeno i ty of use . at the time the Downtown Specific Plan zoning designation was plaed on the subject property . _ 5 . a'he location , site layout , and ee.siq;: of the proposed motel use doe:, properly adapt the Froposrd titrt•�3-story motel structure to :streets , driveways , and alleyso and uses in a r hartnonious mariner . } 6 . Access to and parking tor the proposed oue will not create undite traffic problems if Lies i�- pled as pre-scribed in the attached conditions of approval . 46 s ` 3 C. .,._._._.--.. .. ...-......,.... .vaw.•.+. ,' : I / ,:*a.:.t:,tirl:'X1c4w....IL'�.';t, .. +.....:.,::fNd:1':r.�1?�"AXii]67.T'�YM.r... ... .._...r.+.....��-... . . ..�..-.,+++ s^...:... .. ..-...-.. 1 .. • .ram 1 '� COt1UITIO11S OF APPIIGIIAL COIIDITIOVAL USE PERMIT 110. 65-20" 1 . The site plan dated July 11 , 1985, and floor plans and elevat,io'ns dated June 6 , 1985 shall be revised and submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director refler_t: inf� thc• follo�iing mcdificatiolis : a'. she drive approaches oa 8th . Street shall conform to Public works standards . b. The driveway ramp to tie subject parking sha1l not exceed a• 15% slope . c. Additional architectural treatment along the 'nor th elevation , such as inset- windows or projecting horizontal bands , shall he provided. d . Setback first floor of ;structure 3 feet from ultimate rear property 1_inc. 1 e . A conceptual pla:i showing how the adjacesL IpE . can be ' 1 integrated into the development and thFr ad}acent restaLrant parking lot . 2 . Valet parking shall tie utilized all year round . ' 3 . A parcel map shall be submitted and recorded prior to the issuance of building permits for consolidating thc• existing 2�; foot wide logs . t 4 . The applicant shall make an offer to acquire the adjacent 50 � foot wide lot and integrate into the maLel development . It • the applicant is unable to acquire this parcel , a .letter of offer and rejection steal .l be submitted Lo the Department of S Development' Services . L5 . A detailed landscape plan and sprinkler plan shalt be in y accordance with the Downtown Landscape Guid,-lines ,' including the use of extensive berming in the front setback area along 4 Pacific Coast Highway; and shall be submitted and approved by the Dovel opmen t Services and Publ i o Works Depar t:meh to prior to the issuance of building permits . - 6 . A materials pallet indicating final colpr choices of the building materials and an arehetectura 1 design consistent with ' the proposed Downtown Specific Plan archectural guidelines must he submitted 'for review and approval by the• Development Services Director prioE to the iscuance of buflding permits . •7 . Prov410n.; must: be made to buffer t hie motel from the adjacent oil ,operation, ,,and are subject. to review and app' roval by the sir- end Development ;Services Department. : , it 8. An automatic sprinkler, sy:;t:em approved by the Fire ;Depart men t shall be installed throughout the complex per H. F .P. A. STandard" 13 . This system must be supervised per Fire Department Stardar.ds. 9 . A wet' standpipe sy;gtem approved ity the Fire Uepe•.�Tent shall i ` be Mistalled in the stairways and is to comply t* Unifdrm ' I� Building Code Standards . 10 . An alarm, system approved by the Fire Department shall be installed throughout per Uniform Fire Codes Standards . 11 . To accommodate the use of an ambulance gurney, every floor served by elevators shall have access to , at leapt , one• -- eleva 'Cor car having a minimum inside car platform of six feet# . eight inches wide by four feet , three inches dee•p 'iiith a minimum clear opening width of forty-two inches . • 12 . The water system roust: be upgraded La, provide a Eire flow of 31500 Gim . New fire hydrants are to be instal.16� .in areas approved by the Fire Department. - . 13 . The stairway enclosure on the south side muz;t include a curr'i.86C on the ground iJoor leading from the stairway to the exterior of the building or the stairway can exit dizectly to , the south side exterior . 14 . Two exits shall he required for the spa/lounge on the, roof deck . : 5 . The 2-112 font of alley dedication r-.ha.11 be paved per, City Standards . The developer shall also pave the entire dedicated alley from 8th . Street 4o the northwesterly property line. 1E . The curb and gutter along 8th. Street shall be constructed at 20 . 5 feet: from the centerline to accommodate future perpendicular parking when 8th . Street is eul-de-saced. • 17 . A 2 foot wide public util -ities easement is required behind the ' sidewalk . la . An 8 inch minimum water main shall be constructed 'in 8th . Street: . 19 . A sewer main shall he constructed In 3th. Street fry>:n pacific Coast Nighwas to the Orange County Sanitation Dist;-, ct Sewer Trunk in Walnut X entje and conner,t at an approved;location. , 20. Any abandoned oil wells shall be no' di.fied as regtrirgd by the Fire Department prior to the issuance of buildin§,'jjermits . i'�21 .11 - Low volume heads shall be used on all showers . 22 . A1.1 building spoils s building P such ,as t�nur;�."ale lurbe� , wice; �,riip*���anc: other surplus or unusable materials sha1.1 he disposed of.,at an., cuff-sif, �•:rea Equipped to harldle them. 23. Energy-officient lighting shall be used i'n 'cpcn space areas . 24 . A cis►'►ailed sails analysis shall be prepared by a!''h-gistcred � - " ,,ci _s� en ineer . This analysis shall i ncicsdc on si ..e sampling in , �3 Y p 9 and lt%horatory testing of materials to provide detail ' recoinc•1nda tions regarding grading,. chemical and fuel properties ioundatians, retaining walls , streats'and, utilities , etc. 25 . The Planning Coms .:ssion reserves the right torevoke tri, Conditional Use Permit if any violation of these' eonditi.ons or the Huntington React, Ordinance Ccle occurs . 'I 'sQr.a by certify that Conditional Use Permit tla . S5-26 and Coasta 1 Development Permit No,. SS-11 was approved by .the Plaining Commis-ollon , of the City of Huntington Sewch on kigusl a, 1985 by t: g, foregoing ' citations and conditions. ' Sincercly , James W . Palin rti Uevel opoent Sery ice-s .1'el P : l c�: ; 3u37d( 1 } 4; i i • '�tfCEt�� �;y- !I OF t� 4ww o►roctb ItiG1C(d gC 1AAT5UK ;AND QRR AC4.S. rOLMOR 04#4A PVII�G804G: S )VIC I IQ ' 4 ►to► 4640 A, *•AT14Un HOC C►CC. NGa'C ; � woecwT .r pqq LOSC $LAC" CkUFOKNIA 00802 • o• Ctaval�. �r �t •�:.s .p, c.,py,o. ..t� c. •..aKs August 13 , 1985 Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk City of Huntington Reach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Appeal to City Council of Crant of Conditional Use Permit No. 85-26; Pro sect Site : Bop Pacific Coast Hichwav Dear Ms . Wentworth : r� Please be advised that this office represents .Larry R. t r f . a a r .�a te_l.in the o�tner o_ the vacant lo.. or+ ..he no..thwest boundary of the above referenced project site . On August 5 , 1985 , the Planning Commission granted the above refer • ended Conditional Use Permit over the objections of Mr. Vasterling. Accordingly , notice is hereby given that Mr. Vasterling intends to appeal the decision of the planning Commy,..,sion to the full City Council . The general ground, for the appeal :s that the proposed development of a 52 unit motel upon the project site will have a detrimental impact upon the value of Mr. Vasterling ' s property. Specifically, Mr. Vasterling objects to Item No. (1) of the Planning Commission Findings in this regard, which stated that the development would not have a detri- mental impact upon the value of the property in the vicinity of the ,project site. k local ordinance requires a minimum parcel size for develop- ment with a 100 ' frontage on Pacific Coast highway. Mr. Vastezling' s property only has a, 50 ' frontage an Pacific Coast Highway. A Taco Bell restaurant is''situated on the y f Mrs Vaster s roperty . -.hus, the northwest•�boundar o � ` g'; p proposed development w�u_d leave. Hr. Vasterl.ing. with an 'iso- lated 50 ' wide parcel which he could z�ot develop on his own , His y � v f '•..his : existing�neigh a would uelZ the to one a i v •Vasteilin is .granted hors. Unless' Mr. g. . some` relief from the pro isioris , of the ordinance requirtng , W6, 4 -P ; Ks . Alicia Wentworth August 13, 1985 t, Page W*a a 100, .frontage on Pacific Coast Highway, the apprcv- l of the proposed project will, in effect, result in a Making" of Mr. Vastesling' s property without- just eompensatien . Therefore , Mi ,. Vast.erliny' s appeal is both necessary and appropriate. Kindly please cLt the matter for a hc:%ring befn,re the Council , and advise this office of the date thereof. We would like the opportunity to submit a wri ten brief to 'c.he Council in advance of the hearing date . Please do not set the :ratter for a hearing between August 25th and September 8th, because I will be out of the office during that time i and unable to appear on Mr. Vasterling ' s behalf. i Thank you for your anticipated courtesy and cooperation . sincerely yours, ..I F.ATSUX AND ORR By ROBERT M. ORR t .IMO:bb cc: Mr. Vasterling r � 44 r Publish Ait_uat 22, 1985 NOTICE OF PUBMC_ , n..L1RING APPUL TO PLANNING COHHISSYON APPRO?AL OF CVNDITIORAL 13SL PERHIT 85-A26 NOTICE IS HMUEBY GIVEN that a public hearing %111 .be he1A by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, is the Council Chamber of the Citric Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on, Tuesday, the 3rd day of September, 1985, for the purpa:p of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's approval of a requ+'st to permit Construction of a 52-unit motel on a 20,000 square focat lot with a special permit request for encroachment of a r-gnopy 10 feet into the required 15 foot exterior side yard setback and for a reduction in drive isle widths. All InteresY-i;d persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for c'r against said appAal. Further infor=tioa may be obtained from the Office of the Citq Clerk, , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 - (`114) 536-5227. Dated: August 16, 1985 CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEASH By: Alicia M, uentwirth City Clerk r A 1 r LIP ri NOT I C- OF Pb A tht -i�ltv`'C'i f�'� - R U 8 6 IC H EARTN'%)"`""' .:.x..,....r....r,,. CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT NO. 85-26 (,.�f'176d) AEol [cant : ' COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 95•-,:l C& ae4,4� NAN PATEL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN tha'da public haring will be..held before the r. Huntington Beath . : ,� for the purpose •of cerss"ideririg. &11k , ` tip,►.�I ima equest to pern.it construction of a 52-unit motel on ` a 20 , 000 souare Foot Iot with a special Ferinit request for ' encrdachm , of a canopy 10 feet into the required 15 foot exterior ' side yarn' .tback and for a reduction in drive isle width3. The public: !eirinc on the proposc.d request will be he.l•�3 onjTue3day, Se-pr 3 � 1985, at 7 .S0 PM in the City Council Char bens, Civic, Center, ! 2000 Main Street , Huntingt;:.n Beach , California 92648 , at which time and place written and oral Lestinon".? will be presented. Anj person desiring forth?r information regarding this ratter may contac', Scott. Hess , Assistant Planner , at ( 714 ) 536-5271 1f Ybu. would like to be notified of the taken on this request , W,eaze nubmi t a w: itten request and a it7mped .sell-addrt�S.ied eavelage . _ •i JWP : SH : kld I ( 2708d ) VICINITY ;SAP Imo,. � /r• � ��/ f �� ) i �� r 'nX� l �`� �I ,fir •`I,,� + ..� i i - - ��O} j ^ �. '� /� 11••yr� � . ' 1, i". a • Jw i --Pt !wish — Auguat 1985. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLAM4Z NG COMMISSION APPROVAL i OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-26 it-6F?AVFAE ' l NOTICE IS HERM GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the C!.ty CoosncIl of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic i Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.H. , or as soon thereafter as possible on the X d day of September, 1985, for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Co=fission's approval of a request to permit construc0on of a 52-unit =ote'_ on a 20,000 square foot !at with a special permit request for Nncroachment of n canopy 10 feet into the required 1_5 Poot exterior side yard setback and for a reduction in drive isla widths. t Ail inte.ested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express i their opinions for or against said appeal. . Office of the City Clerk v be obtained f roa the. Uf f i y Further informa tion �s 2000 Main Street, uurtivaton Beath, California 92648 - (714) 536-5227. Dated: August ' 1985 . i CITY OF MNTMTON BEACH By: Alicia M. uenti,orth ; City Clerk fieor,7 er /ram: yrr! C,o!!ar f71•si 9aZ•1 e 18 t` i USE BAIL POINT PEN ONLY —PHESS F1RPALY. CASH RECEIPT i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH t ..U►�t+n.G'Gw of %C14 SAL e IT141 Safi Is11 CITY TPEASUpEp — NAARVO G. "ALL Owl r�`�/ 0A Tf C.IEPT ESSultir, ,�.--�.• ( (-' r r vo �Y^lam«iti•� "='>- ati Cure .� CaS•, } Cr+ECK S A 9 A -01 AMOUNT 'y rr► I .....�.M.«.r....'.�.r - �1 TOTAL G 9 a y 2 CU5T0:ls. CQ�Y No. F .+:.r..f,.K.71rr+?": .,.ryria w:^F 1 '':i .... -.^.. .. .!:'^ u+. -J �...i; . . ";'!'S[wrwd.1..i.. .G ....�•'! 1.♦kY„ Y - CLERIL CtPf �f t,aw O►rtCGsl ;I tit SE&Cfi tNt,F. MATSUK AND Oktt K{I^ IJ 1fr 4� � t u wCltb 01AA130 14/p0% 31VILDI►►G. SU'TC tot,y r tiv+J LtC►•+wRO a., wt,kTb'a.• ' IOo pCCntvGA'C pOI1G4T M. OAR LONG 6EACH, CAUfORNIh O3802 trl: ..s:•ti�tse . Or tCl l'wtt♦ CMgfSTpwHCp C. t.itar„•, August 13 , 1985 i Alicia M. Wentworth , City Clerk City or Huntington Peach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , California 92648 Re : Appeal to City Council of Grant of Conditional Use permit NO. 85-•25 ; Project Site: B00 Pac:.fic Coast Highway Dear Ms . Wentworth : Please ase be advised that this office represents Larry R. 1 Vasterling, the owner of the vacant lot on the northwest boundary of the above referenced project site. On August 5 , 1985 , the Planning Corunission granted the above refer- enced Conditional Use Permit over the objections cf Mr. Vasterling . F,ccordi,ngly , notice is :hereby given that Mr. Vasterling intends to apPeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the u.. h ` l City Council . � appeal is that the proposed for the n c The General ground develop ment of a 52 unit motel upon the project site will 1 have a detrimental impact upon the value of Mr . Va:;terling ' s f property* Specifically , Mr. Vasterling objects to Item No. (1) of the planning Commission Findings in tha-, regard, which stated that the development would not h ave 7 etri- mental impact upon the value of the property irb the vicinity } of the project site . A local ordinance requires a minimum parcel size for develop- . t. ` meat with a 100 ' frontage an PaciA. fic Coast Highway Nor. Vasterling ' s property only has a 50 ' frontage on PaciA. fic Coast Highway. A Taco Be,'-', restaurant is situated on the northwest boundary of Mr. `Vasterling' s property. Thus , the . proposed development would leave Mr. Vasterling with an xso- 4 lhted 50 ' wide parcel which he could 'not develop on his- own. His `only .alternative would be to sell the property to `one o . his existing neighbors. Unless lair. Vasterling is .grante - d t same relief !ram the provisions _ of the ardiz��xnot: regviriny t+ 0 + . -.-,. ,��'+�... •? �,1,',f 1.«'i3+, .... 'lt s, S:;:f:.�,,`;i1.';i.;,,G'-ia•:,. �`., :i'. ..,+;:'�� f. _..f}',�(. F. ,1`, 1 == - — - F — — -- -d � } Ms , Alicia , Wentworth August 13 , 1985 Page Two . , a 100 ' frontage on Pacific :oast Highway, the appnoval of the proposed project will, in effect, result in a taking' of Mr. Vasterling ' s property without just compensation. Therefore, Mr. Vasterling ' s appeal is both necessary and appropriate . Kindly please set the matter for a hearing before the City Coun il, and advise this office of the date thereo_. We would like the opportunity to submit a written brief to the Council in advance of the hearing date. Please do not set the matter for a hearing between August 29th and September j 9th, because I will be out of the office during that time and unable to appear on Mr. Vasterling ' s behalf. i Thank you for your anticipated courtesy and ecoperation. Sincerely yours, MATSUh AND ORR V CJA By ROB£RT M. ORR RMO: bb cc: Mr. Vasterling r 'j .[.. %s pia "+' t , i. • . J .at�4�t w4 u�, ..i_. ..r..tr_.. •,.4�{+ern. .y�>lik.�a ...�r:., .Z -Sr 1.. ,. {i.'.,/1 ., � ,. Statr of California 4qpon Morris Larry McCamish 'Dept . of Ceneral Services 23, 8th. Street 121 7th. Street ` Sacramento, ,. CA 95e14 H. Beach , CA 92648 H. Beach , CA 023-170-08 024-123-04 024-124-07 Ritard Doyle Alta. Foltz Huey Yiu Fu 206 .9th. Street 15235 Cerisa 702 Scripps H. Beach , CA 92648 Gardena , CA 90249 Claremont , CA 91711 024 --117-09 024--123-05 024-124-08 Helen cowling owlin Wilma Mossteller Helen Hosp 182E Park: St . 115 8th . St . 4628 Alta Canyada H. Beach , CA 92648 H. Beach , CA 92648 La Canada, CA 91011 024-117-10 024-123-07 024 -124-09 i - John Penfield Sylvia Augustine Surendra Barot 806 Walnut P . O. Box 2967 720 :pacific Coast Hwy . j H. Beach , CA 92648 Costa Mesa , CA 92628 H. Beach, CA 92648 i 024--117-17 024-123--08 024-124-10 i Michael Fosco Larry vasterling Johannes Boelhouwer 714 Walnut 437 N. Sappington 4508 W. Dalboa H. Beach , CA 92648 Glendale, X0 63124 t.ewport Bch , C+ 92663 024-116-10 024-123-09 024-124--13 w,, Nancy Moore Mary Gardiner W� Siam Paxson Y i iI "'9th . 5t. P.O. Box 257 4729 North 7th H. Beach, CA 9264$ H. reac'� , CA 92640 Phoenix, AZ 85013 024 -122-06,07 024-123 -13 024-124-16 e Gst . Specialties cialties Merle Mehler Margaret Cookereley Orange P f 636 E. Chapman qj- 870 Reins Rd. 1036 Main Orange, CA a2656 T 0 r�w12�-0 G housan(t Palms , CA 92276 H. Beach , CA 92648 2 - 024 -123-14 0,24-124-18 I� Carlos Hathaway John Thompson riacmi Gli � 2737 Mendoza 6922 Church P. O. Box 756 Costa Mesa , CA 926?6 H . Beach, CA 92649 La Mirada , CA 90638 024-122-09 024-123-15 0.4 124-19 Betty Nigli Anthony Ursino State of California - Dept .Walnut 10211 Cowan Heights Depc . of Gen . 'Services H. ©each , CA 92648 Santa Ana , CA 92705 Sacramento, CA 95814 024-122--10 024-124-01 024-125-01 'Evelyn Cochran James Moxich 225 11 th 'St.- 28615 Cover idge H, N; .ach , CA 92648 R. Palos Verdes , CA 90274 t 024-124-02 ,03 Andrew VH. Beach Pacific Beach alof f vel�fa 'Cochran ��t0 7"1 Ocean Ave. 12523 E. Adler 225 11th St. Whfttier , CA 90606 H. Beach , CA 92648 H. Beach , CA 92648 024--124-04105, 06 897-050-01 ,02 Htp P 'cifi.c House Hunt. Pacific Beach f)ur,t. Pacific Beach 13Z6 N. vaiverside Dr . 3182 9rimhall 4952 Warner 30 Palm Sprinas , CA 92262 Los Alamitos , CA 90720 V. Beach , CA 92649 897-050-03 897-050-14 897 -050-25 Hunt . Pacific Beach Fount . pacific 8euch 11801 Highview 21821 Seac:rest Santa Ana , CA 92705 H. Beach, CA 92646 337-050-04 897-050--15 Hunt . Pacific Beach Bunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Peach E14 La Porte 1372 Apsley 21.062 arookhurst La Canada , CA 91011 Santa Ara , CA 92705 K. Beach , CA 92646 897-050-05 897-050-16 897-050-27 HunHunt . Pacific Beach Hunt , Pacific Beach p.0 raSox-_8625 8 Reach - 3036 Capri 7925 Southwno P.O. 25 cA 92708 Costa Mesa , CA 92625 H . Reach , CA 92648 89 . valley,7-050-26 897-050-06 897-n50-17 9 Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt. Pacific Beach 'a H _ Pacific c Beac h'z H�.�r Paci 16036 N£antic 14592 Petsworth 18821. Delaware .01 • Beach , CA 92644 ' Westminister , CA 92683 H . Beach , CA 92648 �• 897-�50-07 897-050-19 897-050-19 , 29 , 30 Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach 120 711 Ocean 205 711 Ocean Ave . 327 711 Ocean Ave. H. Beach , CA 92648 H. Beach , CA 92648 H, Beach , CA 926•�8 a 897-050-31 897-050-09 8_ 7-050--20 S each pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Reach : Htc.nt . Pacific ? Hunt . 711L Ocean 206 16131 Santa Barbara 16306 Niantic Fs. Beach , CA 92649 H. aeachr CA 92646 H. Beach, CA 92649 - 897--050-10 .1 897 OSO-32 697-050-12 f Hunt Pacific Beach aunt . Pacific Beach Fount . Pacific Beach ' Ocean 111 Soo Newport Center 945 1 Rue Chateau Royal 711 tj aw,� art Bch , C A 92660 iur3c�,-•H••--- h , CA Fi . Beach , CA 92648 P 897-050-33 897-050-11 897-050-22 Hunt . Pacific Beach Hurt . Pacific Beach. Hunt . Pacific Beach ,? W. ocean . Front 7887 'Lincoln 4911 Warner 216 . 16, rt Bch , 'CA 92663 Riverside, CA 92504 H. Beach, CA 9x6d9 N� 897-050-34 . A97-05U12 897 050 23 Hunt . Pacific Beach tunt. PacificBeach Hunt. Pa c# fic Beach , "1725. 5. Douglass C 758 E. Cauad 16787 Bolero "Anaheim, CA' 92806 Covina , CA 91723 H. Beach , CA 92647 897-050-13 897-050-24 897-050-35 r.c . H Pacific Beach Hunt , Pacific Beach Hunt, pacific Beach 711 Ocean 327 1725 S . Douglass C P.O. Box 6519 H. Beach , CA 92648 Anaheim , CA 92806 Anaheim, CA 90270 897-050-69 897-050-80 897-050-92 Hunt. Pacific Peach Hunt . Paci.. ic Bean Hunt . Pacific Beach P.O. Box 268 16512 Brimhall 1425 Miramar H . Beach , CA 92648 H . Beach , CA 92647 Fullerton, CA 92631 897-050-70 897-050-81 697-050-93 Hunt , Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific. Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach 14524 S . Carminta 21221 Shaw 11242 Kensington Norwalk , CA 90650 H . Beach , CA 92646 Los Alamitos , CA 90720 897-050-71 897-050-82 897-050-94 Hunt . Pacific BPacn Hunt. Pacifi.r. Beach 711 Ocean 330 230 N, Lake H. Beach, CA 92648 Pasadena , CA 91101 897-050-72 897-050-95 F." .o,Yi . Pacific Beach Hunt . =ac.ific Beach Hunt. Pacific Beach 7fl Pacific -Coast Hwy . 1251 Oakglenn 1725 S. Douglass r. H. Beach , CA 92649 Arcadia , CA 91006 Anaheim, CA 92806 897-050-73 847-050-85 897-050-96 Hunt. Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach P.O. Box 18186 711 Ccean 413 711 Ocean 424 Irvine, CA 92713 H. Reach, CA 92648 !1. Beach, CA 92648 897-050-74 597-050-86 897-050-97 Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Death Hunt. Pacific ©each 1725 S, Douglass C 4250-1/2 Vermont 18429 Highway 18 Anaheim, CA 92306 Long Beach , CA 90814 Apple Valley, CA 92307 ' 897-050-75 897-050-87 897-050-96 Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt. Pacific Beach 1125 Marshall 8561 Ma.rtinque Redwood City, CA 94063 H. ®each , CA 92646 8?7-050-8b 897-050-99 Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . , Pacific Beach 10,10 Main 150 P. O. Box 853 " H! each , CA 92648 Lake Arrowhead , :CA 92352 897450-77 897-050-00 unt . Pacific Bea Yu Pacific Beach nt.2 " Katr-alii 911 S. tuckneil ves+poz t Bch , CA 92663 Anaheim, CA 92807 897-050-�90 $97-051-01' HUI tcL. Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt. - Pacific Beach ` 19789 'Greenbriar 6356 Riviera 17200 tleuhope � Tarzana , CA 91356 Long Beach , CA 90815 Et . Valley, CA 92708 897--050-71 89 7-050-91 897-051-02 `I Hunt. Pacific Beach Bunt . Pacific Beach 25415 Via Alcira 3166 Orlando Valencia , CA 91355 Pasadena , CA 911.07 897-050-47 697-050-58 Bunt . PaciEic Beach *Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach 1902 Royalty 13 1725 S . Douglass C P. O. Box 111151 romona , CA 91767 Anahei-m, CA 92806 Newport Bch , CA 92663 897-050-37 89 7-050-48 897-050-55 t)lympic Stapakis toy,-b„oL-o,.,— Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach 2821 Tucker c/, p{' �„ q .�., P .O . Box 1065 225 E. EL Horado Pomona, CA 917671 � cu Reseda, CA 91335 Ontario, CA 91764 897-050-38 it, � Je d 89. 7-750-49 897-050-00 halo �r.�'7o,3 ?:tt Pacifies Beach runt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach 3230 E. Cortez 711 COcean Ave. 306 955 Magellan West Covina , CA 91791 :?. Beach , CA 92648 Costa Mesa , CA 92626 807-050-39 897-050-50 897-050-61 Hunt . Pacific Beach tHunt. Pacific Beach punt. pacific Beach 3036 Capri Lane 32242 Azores 1544 Brookhaven Costa Mesa , CA 92626 Laguna Niguel , CA 92677 Placentia , CA 92670. 897-t150-5jI 897-050-62 Hunt. Pacific i�Pach :Hunt . Pacific Beach Hant . Pacific Beach Hun box lfi 758 E . Casad 15680 Windrush Z . Beach , CA 92F,a8 Covina , CA 91723 Hac . Heights, CA 91745 89 7-t3S0--52 8?7 -050-6? 997-050-41 � t1 Pacific Beach Eant . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach �.un w w F. 11100 Warner 356 7l1 .Ccean 102 5351 Marviey H. ` Beach , CA 92646 La Palma , CA 90623 Ft . Valley, CA 92708 R97--,Q50-42 997-050-53 897--050-64 ?unt. Pacific Beach Nunt. pacific Beacr, Nun1 . Pacific Beach` ., . . 1725 S. Douglass C 21291 E. Autry 52., ,. . Grano A Sa Ana , CA 92701 Anaheim, CA 92606 An�.�he0m�,6. A 92807. . 697-050-43 897-050-54 897 0 I , i . OR l 1, Hunt. Pacific Beach Hunt. Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach 902 W. Gleneacles 6156 Riviera 1862.1 Santa Ramona Phoenix, AZ 85023 tong Beach , CA 90815 Ft . Valley, CA 92708 897-050-44 897-050-55 897-050-66 Hunt. Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach Rant. Pacific Beach 18621 Santa Ramona 12305 oxford 192 S. Starlight Ft. Valley, CA 92708 La Mirada , CA 90638 Anaheim, CA 30807 897-050-45 897-050-5+6 897-050-67 Hunt . Pacific Beach Hunt . Pacific Beach Hun: . Pacific Beach . 26712 Westvale 8231 Terry 16306 Niantie Palos Verdes , CA 90274 H . Beach , CA 92647 H. Beach , CA 92649 897--050-46 897--050-57 8p 7-050-68 i t i li , 4 4 .1 I l'�OiMiu•.4.{4!2'4,),VYN.. .`.1.41'.qur.,r.YH .. Y »N• Pubzieh _ Augusz �22, 1985 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING APPFAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAI. OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85-26 NOTICE IS HEREBY G.r.V&N that a public hearing will be held by the City ; I Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in ttte Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7 :30 P.M.', or as soon thereafter as possible an Tuesday, the 3rd day of September, 1985, for the purpooe of co nsidering der inB an appeal eal to the Planning coamission's approval of a request to , permit construction of a 52-unit morel on a 20,000 square foot lot with a special permit request for encroachment of a canop, 10 feet into the required 15 foot exterior side yazd setback and for a reduction in drive isle widths. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and expreas their opinions for or agbi.nst said appeal may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, informat ion Further Y 2000 H.aln Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 - (7114) 536-5227. Dated: Au3ust 16, 1985 CITY OF WNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia H. Wentworth City Clerk pi ° ♦ " � _ a I f Y!'Y1 }:ts t ti.l {� !its 1 Pu sh - August 22, 196 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAmC APPEAL TO PLANNING COMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDI7101UL USE ?EMIT 85--26 i NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Heath, at the hour of 7:30 V.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday, the 3rd day of September, 1985, for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Coamission's approval of a request to permit construction of a 52-unit motel on a 10,000 square foot lot with a special permit rcjuest for encroachment of a canopy 10 feet into the required i 15 foot exterior side yard setback and for a reduction in drive isle widths. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and expreso their opi . ..ons for or against said appeal. Further inforzation may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Hung ington Beach, California 92648 - (714) 536-5227. Anted: August 16, 1985 CITY OF FH NTINGTON BEAM By: Allcia y. Wentworth City Clerk - __ _..._ .... .. .......,„ ... .,..,.. +1.'i7t7L: .... n:.D4FrpVa isf'l/+ hU►sil�� �►Zin.w LAW artmCr. :. MATSUK AND 4RFL MCl�9 MApG7 11)AI'.+t gU1..Ge. C?, 4'J +[ piC> ' if'f)NAgb A, NAt9Uw + C]O .?CCANbA'►K AhDtN'I M, Ql1R1 - LO'NG 1ILN01. CALIFORNIA COW2 a covtisr+ l4!13! w 1O? tower C►tiH1�iQ +MGq C. .+AnKs August 29 , 1985 Alicia M. Wentworth,, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 926,01E RE: Appeal to Cicy Council of Grant of Conditional Use hermit No. 65-26; Project Site: gCC Pacific Coast t! hway �,. y Dear Ms. Weritwor th: Enclosed please find an original and eight copies of Appellant' s Brief I Support of Ao eal o the City tt - nt Council in v � P Y o n i the above- referenced e referenced matter . Kindly please lodge the original w;.th your records and distribute the copies to each of the Council memL-wrs f in advance of the Council hearing scheduled for September 3 , 131R5. �A Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this regard. i Sincerely yours, { MTSUN AND ORR 17 BY: ROBERT M. dRP. mmo/cap Enclosures by ' Kft •Y • . 1. :.�. r1 a .. ..( ) ' --- - _'i --�- - -- — - t' K1 ..�P .f �^ 3t �Y i•4- r. •Z! `,- >1 ._ �Tl�.. r#z t i'e��r � -► <.patis~11'`NS nu t+�• �/,'I�t35 � , A , ctQ1 inn win tnrttlt* by finloy saec�tntltcif by 'vreen, to'�iidopt RrAolut.lort ;No.-` 5567, Vie toot inn -r.n rr l pd by roil ra l l vor-P t AYES I fctalkY, His cA}Iiater, Hand ic , !*AIIP.Y, Finley, Creep r NQFS: Now, AhSFNT1 Thomnrt PUBLIC IIFAR1NG -• UPIIEU) FC AND Ut'.t IFD AI'AF.AI, COY 85-•26 - APi'KOYF.n WIsil FINDINGS -- VJWfUTAht; Tito lliynr annoustced flint this wan tile piny and hotir net for n public IwArfnl, to rangidr'r an altpeal f IIPtI by N y nLrttk .�ntl Orr, Attorni s at Law, an behalf- of � l.arrx R. Vanterl ing, t n tiff, Plnnnitip, Cetuninston tippruvrtl of t'undit ira1ai ttnst Ptf-TVAIt 85-26. rnnrlit.Itinni Use Permit 85-26 is n rr.qttrat to permit ronAt rueL ion of n 52••tinI I. viote 1 on a 1U,00i) mquare font lot on pruper Ly located at, the northwest corner of line Ific Conat 111Rliwaty and 6th Street (800 paci f.ic Conn IlIghwny) with n speclln I permit rrttttt mt for encroachment of a canopy 1.0 feet into tite require(! 1.5 toot exter.tor aide yard netback rind for a reduction in drive Isle wltltit Tile Deputy DeptiLy Ctty t1c•rI ntt itce ! t all lc nl re uirement.ts for natt i tent ion, publientfnn and pnr:t rip, Ila(I 2ierq met . Aijtl thnt tlht� Iu�ei received no commijoicatinna or wrtttrott protests to flit► t:tntter. Jim i'nl tit, D1rer.r.nr of Ut►veInpmrnL 5erviven, tnforn!ld Cottnctl that Lhr,y mall been provided wttIt vopit.+n of no "Appel iatit.'n ArIvI in Suj!port nt Aplic.+1" fro;% for Inw tiff Ices of Natstik Orr rereIvrtl joy the City (-Ierk' a riff ire AuRtint 30, 1905. Tltr+ ( Sty Atturttoy stated her uhininn that the nprrllslnt (tilt tlt;t 1'$itie a legal basin for his .• lipen ) . lite ht rert or of tteve.lnpmetst Servicen preneeited aerial sliders of Lite prolverty. l'ite linyor tlecInrrd the lit-raring open. l.eoil;trd ?Ial:~uk , Attt►rnt•y at I,rlu rf'prt'rt•nttng tfte Ahhr11.1rtt. i.nrtl• S'tsr:t.prilr•�;, stetted thrtt the t111 lraf;e tin tite property wnF no lnnRt•r in a XISLenre anti that t lie l,timps wvrt• tint l,tt;nit i ilp,. llp a t.ri t eel t hn t the. property was not tiold because the propctttents rntild tint Aprrt•n rill rt Run 1,attinnon, ro-prene- ifo , thn n1,r11t'nn( uatt rnt.rl , rtiquor.Led that Cotiticil. dony the ril,pt•AI :11111 ttlltt►' tlu• 4trvr`11-Tn"Ilt of tlty prnpt'r% v to r+ovr. [at�ltrir+l. ?here helny; nit tint- piuvo-ill to r wnk Ititther on Litt- mattet' no further hrr,tPAIR f ileri, t+It► yr tirril or writte", the hearing was r_ltttled t►y nisi Mayor. A vint ion wsiq m.1►1e Iq I-tnt•A ll unmet , F:vronfled by l:Yeun, to »phold 01e PlAnnInh C.:car>;ietatart and +le+tt} idle rippt•ti ! nitti to) ripprove CotitlltIon:tl URe Permlt Ila. 85--26 With tile f o l i t,k i nY f I lid Illgr t (of c'iltulit 1011- 1 ltt••r rermit. tt�. 85-26:. ._ . ..__ .._.. . . ...._.__-__.. l . 71tt� 17ft)litl:,t•rt S? unS t not v l lit i l tint hr,ve a tiet r tiIU+t;.ati 4°f fE'ct Uf'rltt tile f;enrral li��� l :l;, t.e•1 f�tr�•, safrl v rtttti convrrilt�nte- t,[ perrn�+na rpsidtitl; 1n Ole nren , nor iiprin rite vAlti- of Lhe propt•rIF 000it L':e- .*tt laity. 2 . 71►r prc►l•uxt,d use in r-iapattbie With ►'Nixt Ing uneµ Ill 0.." v.ic:nitv. tr tihe IoreFo�ng inSltlfr~ent is a l:tH't8i:t 1 tz topy n1 airs utigi;tal on lilt, iti this office_ Atlest•,,�, ALICIA M. tiYt:.'it111�Rj►r City CIe. and Eut;:iirio Clerk tt fhL C:ir Council o! the City of Nttnting'.on Reach, +� .. C1Gfcxnia. i � .emu ♦ ,., y ._. r f ti 1Y;t rig b r= �uhc i 1. hil niit - 9/ Ir5 S - r 1 .1, Tlti► e epond 0to ,nt to t nd objr 'tivea Aapra V ,i the Genrra1 11all snil tlotrnt.ovn ipecifte Plan- 'Me property won lirevluu.mly studded for Attis : lnte►nnJty of Ilse ht .ttiK tl�d :. ti l tlnn 7oninlz df atB nation wtr:�. nlneed on Hite, nUQOc`i iP UuYttrawq, S ►t.c >ric } nr property, r r • ' 5. The Io At Ion, a11.r layout , and rlp,nirtt o1' :1 he liroposed muttyl ' line r,ItyQq I 1 . ly n(Inpt the Itrctpgaed thrr.r-ntory m,:ne1 atructure to tttrr_rtn, � '. rtrIvewriya, Alleyn, mart titres in +t brit t Pinto IOtto mmitners t i 6. Acce,rn to and marking for the proptined use will not create onclt,te. traffic px�hYett:s3 tt rlentgned ns, liras et the-ii to tfie attached cond.tttonn of apl)tuvel. .t Cunditiontc of Ap raval Condtt.tnttnl iit;e Vermit. 1It,. I15-26: 4 lbe Rite plan tinted July 11 , 1,905, and floor plane and elevntions dated ,dune 6, 1985 shnil be revised rind submitted for review and, approval by c the Planning nirer.tnr reflecttnp, the following modifications: n. The drive apprci,'schc,K oil tlth Streit t;hsll conform to Public . Works gtAnti.�rdt:. h. The driveway ramp to the nob_ject rarkinp, Rhall not F►::c#�iA to 157. R t n i►i! C Add ItlnnnI nrritltr-ctitr,il trentmt,nt aIosq., th•r narIh rrle.v< U41, A::;It nFs inRPt windows or projecting borrtcontnl btindn, Oik1l. he provided.' 4. Setback first floor of ntrur.turk+ 3 feet. from u.ltltrrlte_ rear property F line. r, r�. A r_ostr.t-ptual pine sltnwing how t..n r.cl.jacent lot call tic fnit►gratet} } into the Have lormrint and the ,nd jnrent rests+tsrntnt part. i nR lot. shall he provided . 2. Valet pa ri ins slice l 1 1,e tilt t t r.e•1 a l 1. year round. ?. A i:arrt,I mp n1val l be sttbml trial rind recorded prior to the isnutln:e- of building prrmits for ctinstiildatfng the vx1stinl; 25 foot widt• l(AF. 4 Vie appl irant Fhal t nnkt• .-sn of fr-r t.tt nequire, the adjnceiit 50 fut,t wide int and intcgratr, It into the not.el tiev�plopoent . If' the ttppl icrtut Is Linable to artlutre thir, pnrcel , :t stater of offer at t re,jec:tlon +hall be submitted to the ilt+pns-LnettL of lieveloprrent Servicrx. 5. A detailed Inntlrtrtipe I►lats rind sprinkler pinn Mull. be submitted in nrc.ordaner with the Downtuwit t.nttdsc. pt, r;ttldellnen , In%-'ludirt the uve of extensive bermi fw In the front stet bark n ren along Fac i f le G)saat Highway; and shall be n11provr,l by the 'Develoilmerit 5crvtcc6 and Fublic Uorka Dol,nrtments prior to tlir Igsunnce of building permits. Ir 6. A t:ntvrInIs listIlet Intllrntirig f In,aI color ciolress of tttN buIldin6 carttrctstlr: Intl an rtrr.lalter_turaI design cona19t.ent: with the proposed isr,tttttcis:tt pecI [ ir flan nrchitectural gttidelineit quirt be xUbmit.ted for review and nliprovnI by the Ue velopmont Servtc:en Directer- prtar to the Inijunne.;? of building hermits. t r II 4 e ' f The tc,eg�t�A lnslrllment 13 a torrec! COPY'of the p;;gtn31 on f Re in this office.� Attest A.I�U1 r►L YRNMORTH ;t�,y �, arrd Ex•atticio Cluk 1.,� Cily.. ai Iha �it� � nit . r nti ; �• ll cotincil Mtnt� 9;3/85 5 ?. Provislatss moat be mtsde to ea Perot- on and are: xub ee:t to review and a twat b the FJr buffer tht. motel i rezo� Llia nd Rent =. P r .1 FP Y �tncf Atvelortnent Sr.rvit;en Departmnt ,tutomritle aprinkler nyste.'m taj:lsroved by Ilse V11.0 »e [wrtment ttl.niF.I 1rr inNt�lle=� tbruuAltaut the enatp,lntt per H.F'.P.A. Standard 13.' 111ik ttynteetl ro>>pt he au}lervioad per Fire .Nisojament Standards. r' 76 A wet "tanciptpe n-yaten rtpproved by the Fire Department nhall be ins aIle('l in the atairwayn anal In to comply with `Unl f orm Mil ldiny, Code Stanrlardrt. i .10. An n1ritra a ystem y n pprnver! by the Fire Department opal t Ire instal led throtrghotit per hniform Fires CudhA Standards. I1. To accommodate the use of an ambulance gurney, every floor served by t elevators shnil- have access to at least, one elevator car having . a rainia�tex� inside car platform of six feet , eight inches wide by four feetl c three inches deep erlth a refntmum clear: opening width of forty-two inches. 12. The water s ntem mutit be upgraded, Y pR to provide a Eire flow of 3,500 GPW. , New Mire lsydrants Are to be! inntn1led In areas approved - by the Fire Department . s 13. The otnirwny enclosure on the arsuth side must ifscludp a corridor on the ground floor lendl►ip, from the stairway to they exterior of the building., or the stairway can exit dirp.ctly to the south side exterior. F 14. Two exits shrill be required for the asln/lounge on the ronf deck. 15. Th 2-1 /2 foot of al ley dedication shalt be paved per City Standards. i The developer ahnll alno pave they entire dedicated alley from Sth Street i to the northwesterly property 11ne. 16. The curb and gutter along lath Street shnll be constructed at 29.5 feet s from the centerline to nccomnodate future perpendicular Parking when Oth. Street is cul-de-Raced. 17. A 2 fhot wide public uti 1 itiea easement in required behind the aidewnik. 1S. An 8 Inch minimum x:tter main shall be constructed in 8th Street . 19. A newer mnin shall be constructed in Uth Street frcm Pnc4fIc Coast Highway to the Orange County Sanitation District Sever Trunk In Walnut Avenue and crnnected at nn %pproved location. 20. Any nbandoned oil wells shall he tyodified ar. required by the Eire Department prior to the insunnee of building pernitx. 7.1. Low v.;?ume heads ahn l l be used on all showers. i 101. All hulldinh sp-)i is stisc h as unilpabls lumber , wire, ripe and othe'c eurplun at ununahle mstearfaln shnl l he disposed of nt an of f-pite area equipped j to hand lip :her,. 23. Rnergy-•efficient ilglst inil 01.111 liv used in open sprtce. nrrns. 24. A detailed snits Analysis steall 13e prepared by a registered noilts engineer. This annlysis shall ttsclUde on-Rite sampling and laboratory i t jt The foresinR instrument is s fcrte�'t" cap: of the W01131 ea EW in this ollice. 4 1 19 r i N;1CIA M.1NfHT ORTN . Oily CtwF aid is tfiti4 CI it of tha pity CoUnc 1 of llte Ctly of lsc:ntin�;ton ucac3t. ,i} 3 Calilornia, y c' i Fe Page 8 -'Counct t Minttit - 9/3185 tet�t.lnx. " of w,+t�riniR to prnviete Iletnilell reyr,aame"ndrttior:n re�parding andaetan � sa fill 1>rbp fgrading, rhemicn reAtainlnR atreetr unit ut:i lit ten6 etc. xS. .;1'ha P1'e;nntnK t;rnsmletsltisn tr.arrvret the right to revoke this: Cundltie,nal` tit;e�: ' ` Permit i f any ; vtairtt lien of " tt,eear r.eandltte�nR -or tlsr. llunt.lnPton t'e'rech , I.. ro Ordinnnee Code orr.urn. The notion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Kelly, ' MncAl linter, Ilonel tc, Dailey , Finley , Green HOES t None ABSENT: Thomrttt PUBLIC I{FARING -- HUSHRUON FARM SMALL LOT AREA •- NEED 9ND Nt?GESSITY FOR EMNLNT DOMAIN - RESOLUTION NOS 5559 THROUGH5566 Thtu Deputy City Clerk presented n communication from the Chid or Administrative Services requesting a Public Ifearing to allow the Heed and Necensity for acqui=le•g certr,in small lots by Kminent Uotai+in it+ the llur;liraom Farm small lot area for Huntington Central. Park. �ttl owners lave been duly notified of tl+e hearing. No property owner Ilan written a regoest to appear c - o f hearing. c notice(lays +f n � i n 15 t sari epeAk wi thl y Mayor Bailey atntecl thnt the City Council would eat this Lime consider Resolution lion. 5559e 55609 55619 5562, 5563, 5564, 5565 and 5566" which are resolution of necessity to acquire a portlnn of the Huahroom Farm cHlled the small. lot Area for tile MY' s t;e+ltYcil Park and relocation of the aobtlehome park. The IOLA are located north of Ellis Avenue and cast of Goldettwest Street . Mayor nailey stetted that t_he purponp of the noticed hearing was to nllow t.ltase ovnern of land in tl+e project areas to be hev id concerning three topic areas: 1 . Uhe'ihear the public interest and necesst.ty require tar_ pro.icrct. S 2. Whether t?+e protect Jr. planned and located in a mnnner that would be= host comi+.-tti.ble with the grentee;t puhl is good and the. .least private injury; and 3. Whether the property gels+p,ht to be ncquired WA% necessary for the project. Iiaycfr AAi ley stated that It Was not LIM purpn;e of the :ioticed henrint; Lo consider the vr+l ue of the subject property r+tid therefore , no test inrn1 or eviaenre would he receivoll o++ thl" iosue of compensMilos, or any Lopic other l ' thnn those prevtntinly mentio++c+li. MayeIr Halley c.311e11 the noticed hearing open. '.;Ile stated that those entitled i to ppc'Ak on the sta' Pli tnpics mug: l+nve an ownerr;hlp interest in the property , i or their 1a~Y,A1 rvprenentntiVV, .111d they mtlst Ili.'" filed with the Gity Clerk;Cterk n not tce of their intention to spenk fifteen clays prior to the t�cl wlletllr'r tilt-, Deputy City Clerk had received any such hearing. She inquir notices from the owners. 'the. 1►eputy City Clerk stated that no naticee+ of intentloe: to speak hnel been received. r is 'Fite Mayor declnrod Lac hearing10 cloned. I' t rf - I 1 t 9 The foregoing instrument is a 'C Mscs copy of the original on liie in this office.. Attest 1�? -, 19 �''- , 70CI M. Wt:r�rTW0A1 N FF a City Clerk and.Cz•officio Clerk of ttic Clr Council of the City of .Huntington '0e3ch,: �alitariti_a - 1 7 7f t W i i i'