Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2018-49 amending Residential Permit Par City of Huntington Beach File #: 18-275 MEETING DATE: 9/4/2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works Subiect: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-49 amending Residential Permit Parking District "P" affecting residents along Royalist Drive and Willett Lane Statement of Issue: Residents along Royalist Drive and Willett Lane have petitioned the City to be included in Permit Parking District "P." Financial Impact: The provisions of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10.42 requires that the residents choosing to participate in a residential permit parking district pay a proportionate share of the cost to establish or amend the district making the district cost-neutral to the City. Typical costs include, but are not limited to, installation of signs, curb markings, staff time to issue permits, and administrative costs to create or amend the district. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-49, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Permit Parking District "P" Within the City of Huntington Beach." Alternative Action(s): Deny the recommended action. Analysis: On August 18, 2014, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2014-58 creating Permit Parking District "P" consisting of Plymouth Lane between Edinger Avenue and Royalist Drive. The parking district is located north of Edinger Avenue just east of Springdale Street (Attachment 1) and consists of eighteen (18) addresses (Attachment 2). The permit parking restrictions are all day, every day, including holidays. Public Works received a petition submitted by residents on Plymouth Lane (north of Royalist Drive), Royalist Drive, and Willett Lane requesting to be included in Permit Parking District "P" due to City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 8/29/2018 118 poi=aced by Legstar` File #: 18-275 MEETING DATE: 9/4/2018 commuter vehicle parking impacts and related disturbances. The petitioning residents expressed commuter vehicle parking related concerns that included inability to park in front of their homes, parked vehicles blocking their driveways, littering, and the moving of trash receptacles on pick-up day to create additional parking areas. Attachment 3 shows the current parking district and streets requested to be included with the parking district amendment. Following procedures in Municipal Code Chapter 10.24 (MC 10.24), Residential Permit Parking, staff reviewed the request, determined the petition and concerns of the residents were valid, and examined the proposed boundaries. Staff prepared and mailed letters to the affected properties explaining the permit parking district requirements, proposed boundaries, and ballots for voting on the parking district amendment. MC 10.24 requires a minimum of 75% of the property units be in favor of the proposal to move the request for further consideration. Of the 86 affected properties, 67 ballots were completed and returned with 41 voting in favor (48%) of the proposal. Although the original request did not receive the required 75% supporting the entire amendment area identified in the petition, after reviewing the voting results and conducting initial field observations, staff modified the proposed amendment streets with concurrence from the requesting residents. Attachment 4 shows the proposed permit parking amendment streets. These streets received the highest percent of voting support for permit parking and include Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane (80% support), and Willett Lane south of Royalist Drive (78% support). Municipal Code Chapter 10.42 allows staff discretion to modify the proposed boundaries of a requested permit parking area for consideration. As required by code, staff investigated the conditions on Royalist Drive and Willett Lane to assess the parking conditions and associated issues expressed by the residents. Staff observed that Royalist Drive experiences on-street parking impacts all day throughout the week; notably impacted between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane with the parking impacts extending to Willett Lane south of Royalist Drive. Staff finds that unrestricted parking on these streets regularly interferes with available on-street parking for the residents and their guests and supports the permit parking district amendment. The number of addresses proposed to be added is 27. As required by Municipal Code 10.42, notices with the date and time of the City Council meeting were sent to the affected properties and properties within 500 feet the proposed amended district boundaries. Environmental Status: None required. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain public safety Attachment(s): 1. Vicinity Map 2. Map of Permit Parking District "P" 3. Map of Permit Parking District "P" with Requested Amendment Areas 4. Map of Permit Parking District "P" with Proposed Amendment Areas City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 8/29/2018 119 powered'ov LegistarTl�, File #: 18-275 MEETING DATE: 9/4/2018 5. Permit Parking District "P" Amendment Staff Evaluation 6. Resolution 2018-49 Amending Parking District "P" City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 8/29/2018 120 powered by Legistar" � S cn BOLSA AVE. 0 PERMIT PARKING U' DISTRICT P Mc�FADDEN AVE. U EDINGER z AVE. J Z � o o .n °o OHEIL Q E— Of Q AVE. m �� m J Q of WARNER w ~ Of cnQ m cn Q AVE. w 3: F- SLATER o Co AVE. Q o m 405 TALBERT AVE. 9� PACIFIC �"o ELLIs AVE. GARFIELD J _ AVE. o \ ATu) Co YORKTOWN AVE. 3: pp� �A'�� ADAMS AVE. � cn INDIANAPOLIS AVE. Y Q o OCEAN q�F J 0 ATLANTA Q = AVE. m _ CD cn U W m w z HAMILTON AVE. m yLjir BANNING AVE. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Fal � VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P 1 121 PRISCILLA DR CALVIN CIR z CIRCLE VIEW MILTON CIR } N z IJ I Q NO SCALE Q z o J CD WELDE CIR = � ry D n o z :2 - LLL-ELh:: L-L-iJ ROYALIST DR 15871 j 1587 15881 15882 15891 15892 Z � J 15911 15912 U U = 15921 15922 Z Q 15931 15932 J J ~ Z Q 15941 15942 CL � (f) 15951 15952 15971 15972 EDINGER AVE LEGEND ® PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ATTACHMENT FsPERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P 2 122 P RIS CILL A DR l58 @ \15 a 158« }]5892 15711 }15712 C A LVI N CIR 1572 15722 15731 \l573 15741 \1574 15751 \1575 ® CIRCLE VIEW Q IL TO N CI R 157E /�578 ® 7572 15772 w < 2 z m 157E Z1578 2 : Z 2 4 15791 }15792 NO SCALE 4 :z S 15801 } 1580 WELOE CI R _2 1582 \ .1582 % 15831 . 1383 : 15841 E 15842 \ \ \ \ \ 15851 1585 �58e\ 15852�582 § j q / j q % j j § 15851k//ƒU\�: . \ ...�.......................�. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 9 15871 �1587 15e2 }�58 215e« 1587215871 1587215871 s e = = 15881 1588215881 15882 15891 1589215891 15892 m ± �} D 15911 1591215911 \ ]5912 D 1592 159221592\ 1592 ® < q 1592 159321592 \ 15932 U y 4 m 15941 1594 159 41 \ 15942 y 15951 l59521595 . \ 595 T59« /5g721597 '\597 EDINGER AVE LEGEND PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P REQUESTED STREETS TO BE ADDED TO DISTRICT R CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ATTACHMENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P AMENDMENT REQUEST 123 PRISCILLA DR CALVIN CIR z CIRCLE VIEW MILTON CIR N � < 1 cf) z J Q NO SCALE Q z � J CD WELDE CIR = z ~ J � o w � J J 1585215851, El- 585215851 ROYALIST DR o `V 15871 j 1587 15871 15872 15881 1588215881 15882 15891 1589215891 15892 O z J 15911 1591215911 15912 U U 15921 15922159-21 1592 z C) Q 0 Of 15931 1593215931 15932 J ~ z Q 15941 1594215941 15942 0- a- (n 15951 159521595 595 15971 �1597215971 1597 EDINGER AVE LEGEND ® PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P - PROPOSED AREAS TO BE ADDED TO DISTRICT P CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH •J� ATTACHMENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P PROPOSED AMENDMENT 4 124 Proposed Permit Parkin District P p g Amendment Permit Parking District P was established by Council Resolution No. 2014-58 on August 18, 2014. The parking district consists of Plymouth Lane between Edinger Avenue and Royalist Drive and is located east of Springdale Street and north of Edinger Avenue. The location of Permit Parking District P in the city is shown on the vicinity map below. The addresses comprising the parking district are shown on Figure 1. CY PERMIT PARKING BOI AVE. o DISTRICT P < = Mc FADDEN AVE. v V EDINGER J U AVEi � 7 a o �HEIL a z W a AVE. m m O J C? CL W ¢ WARNER � 7 AVE. SLATER AVE. QQ,, w 405 m ,� TALBERT AVE. 9� PACIFIC ELLIS AVE. GARFIELDM _ AVE. �-: F-: ��-7 �-: o1 '/ tn -- YORKTOWN AVE. ADAMS AVE. INDIANAPOLIS AVE. Y Q O OCEAN ATLANTA a o = AVE. mz HA�MILTON AVE. y j BANNING AVE. NTS VICINITY MAP - PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P 1 Page 125 PRISCILLA DR �i� , -- CIRCLE VIEW �r -i < NO SCALE ---77TTTT� ROYALIST DR EDINGER AVE LEGEND PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P Figure 1. Permit Parking District PAddn2sses Residents along streets near Parking District P (Royalist Drive, Willett Lane, and Plymouth Lane north of Royalist Drive) petitioned the city for permit parking on their street. The request was to be included in the parking district with the same parking restrictions (all day, every day) due to the impacts of commuter vehicle parking and related disturbances including trash left on front yards, vehicles blocking driveways, and trash bins being moved to enable parking. The original parking district amendment request included adding Royalist Drive between Springdale Street and Standish Lane, Plymouth Lane between Royalist Drive and Priscilla Drive, and Willett Lane south of Royalist Drive. Figure 2 shows the area of the current parking district and the proposed area initially requested to be added to Permit Parking District P. 2 | Page PRISCILLA DR T-] 15681 15682 15591 15692 15711 15712 CALVIN CIR 15721 15722 15731 15732 15741 1574 15751 15752 -1 15751 15762 CIRCLE VIEW MILTON CIR r 15771 5772 _ . N Q vs z 15781 15782 � Q 15791 15792 NO SCALE < t5801 z i580 WELDE CIR z 15821 T 15822 a 15831,E 15832 15841 St 15842 o cv ri7 <r co - 15851 585215851 1585215851 'D m 0 Ea � w04 15851 o o o o 15871 15872�15871 1587215871 1587215871 158721 8871 a ° w 158" 1585 15881 1588 15891 1589215891 1589 J 15911 15912 15911 15912 L) 15921 1592215921 1592 ~ Z 15931 1593215931 1593" KC 15941 1594 15941 ' 15942 a- Cf) 15951 159521595 1595 15971 15972El 5971 1597 EDINGER AVE LEGEND - CURRENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P REQUESTED AREAS TO BE ADDED TO PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P Figure 2. Permit Parking District P Amendment Request As required by Municipal Code Chapter 10.42, staff reviewed the request, determined the petition and concerns of the residents were valid, and considered the proposed amendment area to be reasonable. Staff prepared and mailed letters to the affected properties explaining the permit parking district requirements, boundaries, and included ballots for voting on the permit parking district amendment. Staff followed up with a letter a few weeks later to remind residents to return their ballot. Per Municipal Code 10.42 a minimum of 75% of the property units (1 vote per unit) shall be in favor of the permit parking district amendment to move the request for further consideration. Of the 86 3 � P � e 127 affected properties, sixty-seven (67) ballots were returned with forty-one (41) votes or 48% voting in favor of the parking district amendment. Figure 3 summarizes the ballot results and shows the percentage of support for permit parking by street block. PRISCILLA DR 15681 15682 15691 15692 15711 15712 CALVIN CIR 15721 15722 15731 15732 VOTE SUMMARY I 15741 1574 # BALLOTS: 86 15751 1575 Z 15761 1576 # "YES" VOTES: 41 MILTON CIR < 15771�15772 % "YES" VOTES: 48% Cn a z 15781 15782 �r_ J ::I::: a 15791 z 15792 CIRCLE VIEW p YTTr - 15801 1580 c __0 WELDE CIR z 15821 y- 15822 CL 15831 n 15832 15841 15842 __FTT �- 15851 1585215851 1585215351 0 N N N N N N N 15851 tD tfi cD c0 SO (LT cp cp to (p F 46/0 3E 80%---3 NUTALusT ©K N N N N N N N 0 0 o a a Cc N 1 15871 _I 1587215871 1587215871 F-- 15872158710 15881 15881581 588 158972 2 5891 1589 15911 1591215911 5912 t �1589 92 1191 592 1521 1592 1 59 zGQ531 32159 15932 CD 191 5 J 54 19421541 �15942 d U7) 15951 15952951 595 597115971[ 1597 597 EDINGER AVE LEGEND CURRENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P XX% PERCENT VOTING "YES" IN SUPPORT OF PERMIT PARKING No SCALE Figure 3. Permit Parking District P Amendment Request Voting Results Results of the voting determined that the initial parking district amendment area did not obtain the required 75% support altogether. However, two street sections, Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane, and Willett Lane south of Royalist Drive both voted greater than 75% in favor. Discussions with residents along these streets indicated strong interest in permit parking due to the 4 1 P a g e 128 daily parking impacts and related disturbances from the commuter vehicle parkers. Based on these discussions and the voting results, staff reevaluated the proposed amendment boundary area and determined that it would be reasonable to investigate including these two street sections to the current parking district rather than the initial requested area. Municipal Code 10.42 allows staff discretion to modify the proposed boundaries of a requested permit parking district area for consideration. Figure 4 shows the recommended street sections, Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane, and Willett Lane south of Royalist Drive that were considered in the Permit Parking District P amendment. These two street sections received greater than 75%vote in support of establishing permit parking. PRISCILLA DR 15681 15682 � FMI 15691 15692 -T 15711 15712 CALVIN CIR 15721 15722 15731 15732 15741 1574 z 15751 15752 CIRCLE VIEW MI ON CIR J 15761 1576 r 15771 15772 - 15781 z 15782 J Q 15791 15792 p 15801 1580 z WELD CIR 15821 01582 15831 >- 1583 15841 0 15842 L,5 t5851 00 1585215851 1585215851 15851 ROYALIST DR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `r' 15871 1587 15871 1587 15871 1587215871 1587215871 15881 1588 15881 1588 15891 1589 15891 � 1589 Of Z 15 111 1591215911 15912 CJ- U 15921 1592215921 1592 15931 1593215931 1593 Cr ~ z J J ¢ 15941 1594 15941 15942 CL Q tj 15951 159521595 595 15971 1597 597 1597 EDINGER AVE LEGEND - CURRENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT P ® PROPOSED STREETS TO ADD TO PARKING DISTRICT P NO SCALE Figure 4. Parking District P and Proposed Streets to Add to Parking District P 5 Page 129 As required by code staff investigated the parking conditions and related issues on Royalist Drive and Willett Lane. The code requires that facts exist that reasonably establish that unrestricted parking creates a situation in which the subject streets cannot be used for regular parking by residents or their guests, or creates a situation that commuter vehicles or their occupants produce significant sources of health, safety, or welfare concerns to continue the process for further consideration. Below summarizes the on-street parking information gathered from field surveys of the area. Field Survey 1: Thursday, 6:30 am Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln, north side 10 13 77% Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln,south side 10 13 77% Willett Ln south of Royalist Dr 13 32 41% Field Survey 2: Wednesday, 3:00 pm Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln, north side 8 13 62% Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln, south side 10 13 77% Willett Ln south of Royalist Dr 11 32 34% Field Survey 3: Wednesday, 7:00 pm Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln, north side 11 13 85% Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln,south side 10 13 77% Willett Ln south of Royalist Dr 11 32 34% 6 Page 130 Field Survey 4: Friday, 10:00 am Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln, north side 8 13 62% Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln,south side 7 13 54% Willett Ln south of Royalist Dr 10 32 31% Field Survey 5: Sunday, 7:30 am Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln, north side 12 13 92% Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln,south side 13 13 100% Willett Ln south of Royalist Dr 17 32 53% Field Survey 6: Saturday, 4:30 pm Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln, north side 10 13 77% Royalist Dr between Aulnay Ln and Willett Ln,south side 10 13 77% Willett Ln south of Royalist Dr 16 32 50% Analysis: Field reviews of the area showed that Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane experiences parking impacts throughout the day, with the most impacted times occurring during the weekends. Willett Lane did not experience the same degree of parking impacts as Royalist Drive, however, it appeared to be noticeably affected by commuter vehicle parking south of Royalist Drive. Overall, Royalist Drive between Springdale Street and Willett Lane were observed as being regularly impacted by commuter vehicle parking, with the sections between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane parked at or near capacity during the peak parking demand times. 7 1 P a g e 131 Including the parking impacts, where residents noted that the commuter vehicle parking prevents them from parking on-street for themselves and their guests, the related disturbances associated with commuter vehicle parking was the other concern expressed by the residents. Complaints of trash left on front yards, empty cans and bottles thrown on the street, parking too close to driveways and other vehicles, and having their trash bins moved to allow space to park caused the residents to initiate the process to establish permit parking. During the field observations staff noted littering on the street and front yards in addition to vehicles parking extremely close to the driveways. Photos showing examples of the on-street parking issues are shown on pages 9 and 10. Municipal Code 10.42 requires that specific conditions shall exist for a parking district request to move forward for consideration to the City Manager's office. These include: unrestricted parking creates a situation where on-street parking cannot be regularly used by residents and guests; or, unrestricted parking by commuter vehicles produces significant sources of health, safety, or welfare concerns. After discussions with the residents and conducting the field evaluations, staff finds that the unrestricted parking on Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willette Lane, and Willette Lane south of Royalist Drive creates a situation where the commuter parking regularly interferes with residents and their guests parking, and produces significant sources of other concerns. Staff supports amending Permit Parking District P, adding properties along Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willette Lane, and Willette Lane south of Royalist Drive affecting 28 properties. 8 1 P a g e 132 s� �MZA Photo 1. Parking Impacts on Royalist Drive East of Aulnay Lane. a e `'s • S $ +e"yy� 'k r �- hy u , is hF k`` � �. FI,[ E�.•�' 4. �J +"� Photo 2. Vehicle Parked Over End of Driveway on Royalist Drive. 9 Pv - _. 133 T AW Photo 3. Vehicles Parking too Close to Allow Exiting. 10 Page 134 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT"P" WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 4051, allowing the amendment of permit parking districts in residential areas under certain conditions; and The citizens owning properties along the residential street known as Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane, and along the residential street known as Willett Lane south of Royalist Drive, have petitioned to be included in Permit Parking District"P;" and The Director of Public Works reviewed the petition, sent a ballot for further consideration to residents of the petitioned streets, and caused an investigation which reasonably established that unrestricted parking: interferes with available parking for residents and guests, and produces sources of health and safety concerns; Therefore, the Director of Public Works has found the requirements of Ordinance 4051 to be reasonably fulfilled, and determined that the Permit Parking District will not affect other uses of on- street parking. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. 2. Permit Parking District"P" is hereby amended to include properties along Royalist Drive between Aulnay Lane and Willett Lane, and properties along Willett Lane south of Royalist Drive, effective all day, every day. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of Septeaber , 2018. Mayor REVIEW N APPROVED: APPROVED A gity anager it Attorne ITIATED AND APPROVED: irector of Public`W ` ks 1 18-6767/186006/MG SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ITEM #23 This message is directed to Bob Stachelski regarding the parking permit issue in our housing tract. I am'a long term resident living at 6261 Royalist Drive. The newly proposed additional permit area for our tract will do nothing to solve the real problem. This should be perfectly obvious since making the area from Edinger to Royalist on Plymouth a permit parking only zone led to the residents of the apartments on Edinger just moving further into our tract,. The real problem is that the owners of the apartment complexes on Edinger have not supplied enough parking spaces for their residents. These apartment owners are the people who should be taking responsibility for the problem, not the homeowners in our tract.. Perhaps they should be required to let some of their units stay vacant until the people in parking our residential area have enough onsite parking in their own complex. Another solution might be to require the apartment owners to find space to rent in a nearby lot and pay for their overflow to park there. As a long time homeowner in this tract I feel it is not my responsibility to supply parking spaces for the apartment dwellers, or be penalized by paying for a permit to park in front of my own home. This issue should be addressed with the owners of the apartment complexes to solve the problem not just keep moving it around our tract. Start supporting us individual homeowners and stop catering to the big businesses and special interests. Wade F. Smith, 6261 Royalist Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 AS RECORO MR COINVCIL MEETING OE 3lAU,CITY CLERK r , LINDA TIERNO 6100 Edinger Avenue 4329 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (626)386-3237 August 31, 2018 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Public Works Department Engineering Division 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)536-5451 re: Residential Parking Permits Program To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that even though I have just received a mailer re a residential community's request to your division under the Residential Permits Parking Program to have an area roughly bounded by Edinger Avenue to the South, Springdale Avenue, to the West, Royalist Drive to the North, and Willett to the East, showing a metered mailing date of August 24, 2018 on the meter, and subsequently, August 25, 2018 from the Post Office, the notice is untimely, reaching me up to 7 days later. Where has the mailer been for the last 7 days. Their petition was due to have been completed as to service not more than 2 days later in Huntington Beach, CA. ID From the 24th of August to the 4th of September, 2018 to make a responsive statement to the petition is not less than 11 days. Reasonably, such a petition should be mailed such that an affected community receives it not less than 10 to 15 days before a hearing and especially involving such a community wide issue. This initial and rushed response to be amended by early neat week, will be capsulized as follows: 1. The Petition circulation mailing is untimely. The adverse part of the community should have sufficient time to consider and oppose the matter before any hearing set to be heard on the matter. 2. The hearing should be continued because of untimely service. 3. The petitioning part of the community is not a gated, or private street community, and as such. it cannot exclude taxpayers from streets that they pay for. 4. If the petitioners want to exclude the taxpayers, who in part will be responsible for the maintenance of the excluded streets, they must be required to purchase them and maintain them without anv taxpayer ongoing funding. 5. Proportionally, there are more members of the community adversely affected by the petition than.those attempting to benefit by it. 6. There has not been an Environmental Impact Report attached to the letter to state how it will affect the taxpaying community, including but not limited to senior citizens who will especially be impacted by the any such approval. T Preliminarily, the petition not yet seen should be rejected on its face. Please be advised once again that this preliminary objection has been prepared with virtually no time to do so. Please anticipate further and amended response by Tuesday of next week You are.so advised_. (Linda Ti erno Huntington Beach Resident Stachelski, Bob From: Yadira Lourenco <yadira.lourenco@ametek.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 11:51 AM To: Stachelski, Bob Cc: Stachelski, Bob Subject: Proposed Residential Permit Parking District P Amendment Attachments: Parking_2.jpg; Parking_1.jpg Hello Mr. Stachelski, I am writing to request that the proposed request to require parking permits on Willett Lane be stopped. I understand that residents on Royalist are upset that resident street parking being used by residents at the apartments on Edinger.Thou I understand their concern, requiring the residents on Willett to incur additional costs for parking is not fair. Imposing parking passes for the resident on Willett (including my family) will not solve the problem of limited parking for the residents at Woodlake Apartments or Whiffle Tree apartments. Imposing parking permits on Willett Lane will only move the problem to residents on North Plymouth Lane. Instead of burdening residents that pay city taxes the city should be addresses the parking problem at the apartment homes. The city needs to see what they can do to support the apartment homes and the lack of space they have. The apartment homes have enough space to accommodate the overflow of cars that are on Royalist. Perhaps an alternative that will support the lack of parking space would be to allow for residents to park on their side of the street (currently marked in red).The apartment homes have plenty of available space for their residents and won't create a problem for those of us residents that now have to be inconvenienced to either buy parking permits or get authorization before guest can park in front our home. I am very disappointed that this is happening in my neighborhood. I recently moved to Huntington Beach from living in Cerritos and Irvine. I enjoyed the proximity to the beach as well as the laid back, family orientated living in Huntington Beach. Now having these restricting rules and makes if feel like we are going down the path of Irvine &Cerritos. I don't want to be told who can visit my home and who can spend the night and park in the street. My home is not in an exclusive neighborhood that is gated or requires special access. It's offensive that after living perfectly fine in my quite cul de sac, I have to deal with someone else's problem. I feel the city is taking an easy route by requiring parking stickers (for home owners) instead of address the problem with the apartment's lack of parking. Signed Disappointed and Angry resident (15931 Willett Lane) Yadira Paz Lourenco HR Manager AMETEK Sensors & Fluid Management Systems 17032 Armstrong Avenue Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 270-8350 1 Stachelski, Bob From: Brian Payson <bpayson cx tbgbenefitsolutions.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 11:51 AM To: Stachelski, Bob Subject: Proposed Residential Permit Parking District"P"Amendment Bob, Unfortunately I will not be able to attend the City Counsel meeting this evening, however, I would like to offer my input regarding this situation. While I would prefer to not have parking restricted by permits in our neighborhood it has become very apparent that this is now necessary. The areas under consideration has become a parking lot for the residents of the apartment complex directly across Edinger Ave. It is not just the congestion that causes concern. Trash has increasingly become an issue. Fast food wrappers, beer cans, diapers and a whole host of various waste is left on the street by individuals parking on these streets. It is also not uncommon to see people just sitting in cars either "conducting business" or some such activity. Finally, it is all to common to see people crossing Edinger directly off of Plymouth. There is no crosswalk there and I often cringe when I see people dodging moving vehicles to get across the street. I am concerned for their safety as well as the safety of the drivers on Edinger. Your consideration in this matter is appreciated. Thank you Brian Payson, RHU TBG Benefit Solutions 3030 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite 160 Seal Beach, CA 90740 (562) 286-6235 (562) 286-6240 Fax (310) 678-2230 CA License#0058131 2 � w Stachelski, Bob From: Chelsie Marquez <chelsiec@aol.com> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2018 11:14 AM To: Stachelski, Bob Subject: Proposed Residential Permit Parking District"P"Amendment Hello Bob- My name is Chelsie Marquez and I live on Welde Circle, very near the area where the additional parking permits are proposed. This is a great idea, as I have seen how much the streets have become more crowded with overnight parking, which I believe is mainly apartment residents of buildings on Edinger. I walk the neighborhood quite a bit and see them park and walk down Plymouth. In addition, the overnight parking in front of Marina High School used to be empty on the weekends. However they are not anymore. My concern is that I am afraid this new permit area will just push these parked cars further into the neighborhood and possibly on my street. The high school kids who park in the neighborhood will move as well. I would like to see permit parking on even more streets, including Welde Circle. The high school kids now park and jump the fence, and the 2nd semester brings even more congestion and trash left on the street. We could also use a "Dead End" sign at the end of the block at Aulnay as many motorists think it is a through street when they see the traffic light for the high school. Overall, a great idea, but would like to see it expanded. Thanks, Chelsie Marquez 3 PETITION AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM DISTRICT The City of Huntington Beach Residential Permit Parking program was established to provide residents a means of addressing problems associated with "commuter"vehicles parking on public streets within residential areas.Commuter vehicles are considered vehicles that belong to people from outside of the neighborhood that are neither guests nor residents in the neighborhood.The intent is to restrict the ability of outside vehicles from parking on the streets and impacting dte parking available to residents or causing other"sociay,impacts(e.g.crime,litter,disturbance,etc.)while allowing residents and their guests to use the parking. Hot ever,when such parking district programs are created without the submitting of a full environmental impact report as to how immediately adjacent communities are affected(e.g.,senior citizens,the handicapped,visitors and limited time frame parking,limitations of street parking,taxpayer rights,and obligations to maintain the streets for which they are denied parking,streets that will be denied to the public,but only for use by non-gated communities,and/or non- private streets,etc.),there can and should be opposition raised in immediately adjacent communities bounding the proposed restricted parking areas,to resist the establish ment of such permitparkingdistricts. By signing this petition as a"Mon-Commuter,"and resident of such an immediately adjacent community,you are not only rejecting the petition ofthc community bounded by Edinger Avenue to the South,Springdale Avenue to the West,Royalist Drive to the North,and Willett Lane to the East,otherwise described as District P,and the authority/authorization of the City of Huntington Beach to establish such a district,you are seeking to revoke permits restricting parking in said area,already established in the recent past You are also demanding public hearings to address your concerns. �- Voter Name Address Phone Sin ture Registration No. BF�TfZA.JD �`oa� Optional) Apr Sc�Y. � �9�6 y�5,3-�osa /j 92Gt� Saroev\ SOUOW, q U.v 4 `7f�-701-7D& C A q,2 G k'�- ! (,,aoo EDix1G �t 62oo L .Q�IA t 6 15-7) qD AS KN.F wcop. kMINCll M EETM %V rfCE "OH E6TA?4LR,,,;.fTy CLEW PETITION AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM DISTRICT 1'he City of Huntington Beach Residential Permit Parking program was established to provide residents a means of addressing problems associated with "commuter"vehicles parking on public streets within residential areas.Commuter vehicles are considered vehicles that belong to people from outside of the neighborhood that are neither guests nor residents in the neighborhood.The intent is to restrict the ability of outside vehicles from parking on the streets and impacting the parking available to residents or causing other"social"impacts(e.g.crime,litter,disturbance,etc.)while allowing residents and their guests to use the parking. However,when such parking district programs are created without the submitting of a full environmental impact report as to how immediately adjacent communities arc affected(e.g.,senior citizens,the handicapped,visitors and limited time frame parking,limitations of street parking,taxpayer rights,and obligations to maintain the streets for which they are denied parking,streets that will he denied to the public,but only for use by non-gated communities,and/or non- private streets,etc.),there can and should be opposition raised in immediately adjacent communities bounding the proposed restricted parking areas,to resist the establishment of such permit parking districts. By signing this petition as a"Non-Commuter,"and resident of such an immediately adjacent community,you are not only rejecting the petition of thc community bounded by Edinger Avenue to the South,Springdale Avenue to the West,Royalist Drive to the North,and Willett Lane to the East,otherwise described as District P,and the authority/authorization of the City of Huntington Beach to establish such a district,you are seeking to revoke permits restricting parking in said area,already established in the recent past.You are also demvtding public hearings to address your concerns. Voter Name Address Phone Signature Registration No. (Optional) Of a 322 9 In J rbV J L9.200 Z2-J cry q'50 PETITION AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM DISTRICT 'File City of Huntington Reach Residential Permit Parking program was established to provide residents a means of addressing problems associated with "conunuter"vehicles parking on public streets within residential areas.Commuter vehicles are considered vehicles that belong to people from outside of the neighborhood that are neither guests nor residents in the neighborhood.The intent is to restrict the ability of outside vehicles from packing on the streets and impacting the parking available to residents or causing other"social"impacts ie.g.crime,litter.disturbance.etc,)while allowing resident;and their guests to use the parking However.when such parking district programs are created without the submitting of a full environmental impact report as to how immediately adjacent communities are affected(e.g.,semor citizens.the handicapped,visitors and limited time frame parking,limitations of street parking,taxpayer rights,and Obligations to maintain the streets for which they are dented parking.streets that will be denied to the public,but only for use by non-gated communities,and/or non- privatc streets,etc.),there can and should be opposition raised in immediately adjacent communities bounding the proposed restricted parking areas,to resist the establishment of'such permit parking districts. By signing this petition as a"Non-Commuter,"and resident of such an immediately adjacent comrcnunity,VOL]are not only rejecting the petition of the community hounded by Edinger Avenue to the South,Springdale Avenue to the West,Royalist Drive to the North,and Willett Lane to the Gast,otherwise described as District P.and the authority/authorization of the City of f luntington Beach to establish such a district,you are seeking to revoke permits restricting parking in said area,already established in the recent pass.You are also demandtn<!,public hearings to address your concerns. Voter Name Address Phone Signature Registration No. (Optional) JU ,.5' �. (.-�.. '{t M14�.J (.��._ > `3 Z 0 ,,j 1 "" ..,... / PETITION AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM DISTRICT The City of Huntington Reach Residential Permit Parking program was established to provide residents a means of addressing problems associated with "commuter"vehicles parking on public streets within residential areas.Commuter vehicles are considered vehicles that belong to people from outside ofthe neighborhood that are neither guests nor residents in the neighborhood.The intent is to restrict the ability of outside vehicles from parking on the streets and inmpactnn,,the parking available to residents or causing other"social"impacts(e.g.crime,litter,disturbance,eta)while allowing residents and their guests to use the parking However,when such parking district programs are created without the submitting ofa full environmental impact report as to how immediately adjacent communities are affected(e.g.;senior citizens,the handicapped,visitors and limited time frame parking,limitations of street parking,taxpayer rights,and obligations to maintain the streets tier which they are dented parking,streets that will be demed no the public,but only for use by non-gated communities,and/or non- private streets,etc.),there can and should be opposition raised in immediately adjacent communities bounding the proposed restricted parking areas,to resist the establishment ofsuch permit parking districts. By signing this petition as a"Nan-Commuter."and resident of such an immediately adjacent community,you are not only rejecting the petition of the conmmunity bounded by Edinger Avenue to the South,Springdale Avenue to the West,Royalist Dove to the North,and Willett Lane to the Gast,otherwise described as District P,and the authorilviauthonzation of the City of Iluntin-ton Reach to establish such a district,you are seeking to revoke permits restricting parking in said area,aheady established in the recent past.You are also demanding public hearings to address your concerns. Voter Name Address Phone Signature Registration No. (Optional) me...µ- ZA g F t } g ` V f M#t ' .,,r,� I is t £ pr t� y .. R r,gl�; ^i: r � 3^'t C.` � nr•t,,, r_. yt� i .2 t ( ry > 4 PETITION AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM DISTRICT I'he City of I Iuntingtoo Reach Residential Permit Parkina program was established to provide residents a means of addressing problems associated with "commuter"vehicles parking on public streets within residential areas.Conunuter vehicles are considered vehicles that belong to people from outside ofthe neighborhood that are neither guests nor residents in the neighborhood The intent is to restrict the ability ofoutside vehicles from parking on the streets and impacting the parking available to residents or causing other"social"impacts(e.g.crime,litter,disturbance,etc)while allowing residents and their guests to use the parking. However,when such parking district programs are created without the submitting of a full environmental impact report as to how immediately adjacent communities are atlected(e.g.,senior citizens,the handicapped.visitors and limited time Gmne parking,limitations of street parking,taxpayer rights,and obligations to maintain the streets for which they arc denied parking,streets that will be denied to the public.but only for use by non-gated communities,and/or non- private streets,etc.).there can and should be opposition raised in immediately adjacent communities hounding the proposed restricted parking areas,to resist the establishment of such permit parking districts. By signing this petition as a"Non-Conunuter,"and resident of such an immediately adjacent community,you are not only rejecting the petition of the community bounded by Edinger Avenue to the South,Springdale Avenue to the West,Royalist Drive to the North,and Willett Lane to the East,otherwise described as District P,and the authority/authorizaticro of the City of Huntington Reach to establish such a district,you arc seeking to revoke permits restricting parking in said area,aheady established in the recent past.You are also demanding public hearings to address your concerns. Voter Name Address Phone Signature Registration No. __....._ . _.....__ Optional) W �. 9/4/2018 MY CIVIC CMS Export to PDF This issue is new Est. Resolution Date: Not Yet Set New Receivftsignf&ferrddesolvedCanceled Agenda & #111762 Select Action Select Resolution Public Hearing Select Action Select Resol Comments - Add New Note sub type City Council Meeting COMMENTS&ADDITIONAL NOTES Preliminary Opposition to Proposed Residential Permit Parking District"P" —� Add Files Amendment Share With Citizen Opened: By: Phone: Change Who's Notified 08/31/2018 Linda Tierno 626-386- 16:55 3237 Notify Department PM Email: legalinboots@gma%6fffl: Closed: Est. Res. Date 1 1/25/2017 Submit Reassign Issue Issue SubType Type City Council Agenda&P SUPPLEMENTAL Assign Worker Support Worker COMMUNICATION Select Work Select Supp... Muting Date: _`t— �L/L • l�G Agenda Item No. ��� Total Time &Cost: Oh Omin /$0.00 a, H. : M / $ Notes Save Click here to chat https://mycity.mycivicapps.com/rail/index/4300 1/2 9/4/2018 MY CIVIC CMS Status Johanna 09/04/18 Changed Dombo 9:28 AM The status of issue #111762 has changed from new to resolved. Workorder#111762 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda &Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. 2018© MyCivicApps CMS. Click here to chat hftps://mycity.mycivicapps.com/rail/index/4300 2/2 9/4/2018 MY CIVIC CMS Export to PDF This issue is new Est. Resolution Date: Not Yet Set New Receivddsignittferraesolved Canceled Agenda & #111766 Select Action Select Resolution Public Hearing Select Actiorl I Select Resol Comments - Add New Note sub type City Council Meeting COMMENTS&ADDITIONAL NOTES Correction to Opposition letter to Proposed Residential Permit Parking District"P" -�- Add Files Amendment that was not signed and had a typo in the address Share With Citizen Change Who's Notified Opened: By: Phone: 08/31/2018 Linda Tierno 626-386- Notify Department 17:32 3237 PM Email: legal inboots@gmaMff: Closed: Est. Res. Date --/--/---- 1 i/25/2017 Submit Reassign Issue Issue SubType Type City Council Agenda& P SUPPLEMENTAL Assign Worker Support Worker COMMUNICATION Select Work Select Supp... Meeting Date: 9.- 4--,�A Da l—, Agenda Item No. p� a -�7,$) Total Time &Cost: Oh Omin/$0.00 ,o, H� : M / $ Notes Save Click here to chat https://mycity.mycivicapps.com/rail/index/4300 1/2 9/4/2018 MY CIVIC CMS Status Johanna 09/04/18 Changed Dombo 9:28 AM The status of issue #111766 has changed from new to referred. Workorder#111766 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda& Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. 2018© MyCivicApps CMS. Click here to chat https://mycity-mycivicapps.com/rail/index/430C) 2/2 o" Hasler -44 1& CITY of HUNTINGTON BEACH P P P T 0-;w-S P'o. Box Igo �p U 0.4 115)- Huntington Beich, CA 92648-2702- 7 1 P V i D Resident Yo W 6-100 Edinger Ave Un�t 329 C:-- f qjf H u nti ngton Beach, CA 92647-3266 %,Cyr to w, 27.7 UMP P.[Ill- qu- fo fe r��,N+We,,eota� teal ff? Ar aAWAyi r4w,�r4vav red fll� ihf 1 50 rcuAly 9, U)P— Q Caft* P4c