HomeMy WebLinkAboutApprove the Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan located at )mow_ < .
fiFPk0VL_b 7-0
City of Huntington Beach
File #: 18-459 MEETING DATE: 11/5/2018
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Chris Slama, Interim Director of Community Services
Subject:
Approve the Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan located at the former Franklin School site
at 14422 Hammon Lane
Statement of Issue:
Community Services Commission (CSC) has reviewed and approved the Franklin Park Conceptual
Master Plan. There is now a need for City Council approval of the Conceptual Master Plan as
presented.
Financial Impact:
Not applicable. The 1 .30-acre park and improvements are to be dedicated at no cost to the City.
Recommended Action:
Approve the Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan as presented.
Alternative Action(s):
Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis:
The former Franklin School site is located at 14422 Hammon Lane and currently owned by the
Westminster School District (WSD). The project site currently consists of a 9.8 acre closed school
site and a 1 .52 acre park. Both the former school site and park properties are owned by the
Westminster School District, however, the City currently maintains and operates the public park.
Tri Pointe Homes submitted a request to the Community Development Department, Planning Division
, to subdivide the property to construct 51 single-family homes on a portion of the property. The
Planning Commission approved the development entitlements at their meeting on September 11,
2018. A 1.30-acre neighborhood park is included as part of the project.
The Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan prepared by Tri Pointe Homes was previously brought to
the Community Services Commission and approved at the June 13, 2018, meeting. That plan
City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 10/31/2018
478 powered by Leglst3r"
File #: 18-459 MEETING DATE: 11/5/2018
consisted of a 1.15-acre park with a tot lot, surrounded by open turf and a picnic shelter area.
Residents who attended the meeting voiced their concerns about the proposed location and
orientation of the park and the park acreage going from the current 1.52 acres to 1.15 acres.
Residents wanted the new park plan to be as close as possible to its current orientation, layout, and
acreage.
Residents also voiced concerns regarding the tot lot being designed for the 5-12 age group only.
Although approving the plan, Commissioners also expressed concerns with the inclusion of a large
central picnic shelter, given the problems the City is currently facing at similar picnic shelters in other
parks that have become gathering places for undesirable activities.
Based on comments received from the public and the Commission, Tri Pointe Homes revised the
park plan accordingly. Due to the significant level of changes to the park plan initially approved by
the Community Services Commission on June 13, 2018, staff brought the revised plan back to the
Commission for further review at the September 12, 2018, meeting.
Key changes included the size and the location of the park. The new design is consistent with the
orientation of the existing park, keeping it parallel to Sands Drive. The size of the park also increased
from the 1.15 acres previously proposed to 1.30 acres. Additionally, the tot lot now includes play
units designed for the 2-12 age group. Lastly, a picnic shelter is not included as part of the plan.
Other elements of the plan include open turf areas, benches, tables, and trash receptacles. The plan
also incorporates conservation designs that include a plant palette of low water use shrubs and a
picnic area surfaced with decomposed granite to reduce the amount of turf area. Overall, the
proposed design and amenities of the park are consistent with other neighborhood parks in the City
(Attachment 1). Public art is also being proposed in the park with the caveat that it be maintained in
perpetuity by a Homeowner's Association that will be formed for the new community.
To allow for the expansion of the park to 1 .30 acres, Tri Pointe revised the residential development by
reducing the number of housing units from 53 to 51. As previously reported, the residential
development at the former Franklin School site is being processed as a Plan Unit Development
(PUD) and will be conditioned to provide public benefits to the community.
Per the Quimby Act and Chapter 2.54 of the Zoning Code, a sub-division of 51 units is required to
provide 0.74 acres of undeveloped parkland. As a public benefit, Tri Pointe Homes is proposing to
dedicate the 1.30-acre park to the City - which is 0.56 acres more than required. Tri Pointe is also
proposing to construct the park at no-cost to the City, which is also above and beyond the Quimby
Act and the requirements of Chapter 2.54 of the City's Zoning Code. If the City were to acquire and
develop 1 .30 acres of parkland, the approximate cost would be $1.8 million. Per the approved
residential development project, the City will receive an improved park and dedication of the land in
fee. This will ensure that the City will have full control and possession of the park into the future.
While the acreage will be seemingly reduced from 1.52 acres to 1.30 acres, the City will continue to
meet its park acreage standard of 5-acres per 1 ,000 residents citywide.
It is important to note, that while the existing acreage for Franklin Park is listed at 1.52 acres in the
City's Park Inventory, the area of the park is measured to the back of the curb. The new proposed
park's acreage is measured to the back of the sidewalk, for a total of 1.30 acres. Measuring the
current park boundary in a similar manner (i.e. to the back of the sidewalk) also totals 1.30 acres.
City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 10/31/2018
479 powered by LeaistarT"
File #: 18-459 MEETING DATE: 11/5/2018
The purview of the Community Services Commission was only related to the Conceptual Master Plan
for the park and the recreational elements proposed in the park. The Commission does not have
jurisdiction or authority relating to the land dedication, the PUD or any proposed public benefit.
All park master plans, new or updated, are approved by both the Community Services Commission
and City Council. At their September 12, 2018, meeting, the Commission issued their support of the
revised plan and made a recommendation for Council approval. Based on the recommended action
by the Commission, Council is being asked to approve the Conceptual Master Plan for Franklin Park
as presented.
Environmental Status:
The proposed project, including the public park, requires the processing of a mitigated negative
declaration (MND) through the Community Development Department, Planning Division.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Improve quality of life
Attachment(s):
1 . Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan
City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 10/31/2018
480 powered by LegistarT"
055
l
VVj ¢ r p =Vl
�m ' am ---OIiG SZ a�,
- � r
f
- .���Ya1`i' N4 �•14'+,r-��,31i'�.]t l�l�.y.��k ..i�.d ..r�S'`;,tY �•,- ,L• �I � `�,yt ��'Y��$y }'� i VNV�IdQNl
Y � `i{YI � t ` � `• QI'I
41
R ti. i
Y
qy
c
'
rF7 A
LU
Al
N '
pp
Y
i
� I I
��z � �` r I •---�---- �n.���r--rye-n-------
Y S
2 U.1
A:
=O _ � j
too V I - (J F '1 3 !'i'•4 L
r I
' w
jam•.
MW NOVMVN
zv, FI2 r a �g y\ rc
�QN u�
>>C ,0 w �
u
w (hp w 11ui� 'wF24 ; =QQ
w U
Iw- rY LC� CS 17� io V+C3d ® aF a w
sg L
a. z
a M
LD
ff
WU
m r
rajUA 0
ov R uj w
O'd
>
L)
CL.
uj w
uj L)of r
p
L
of
S II
—Ti
�z 3:M E3
I
or re
.0d
ES II
co
LU
-13
v .
----—-----
4AWO NOM"
u
CL
f
A
W
i 4
►y u NO
C
hill
--A
4 l
o
C ° •.Ill 4
j p 6
'It
v
qA
I cn =!
c _.
as
or
` . fir:'\ '/ y, � N �y •
{ BOA
f;
�A ,- �.
1n�
P
1
/. w
Nit
x�
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
09 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Via: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
From: Chris Slama, Interim Director of Community Services
Date: October 15, 2018
Subject: Item 18-411: Approve the Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan
At the request of the project developer, Tri-Pointe Homes, City staff requests that
Item 18-411 (Approve the Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan) be withdrawn
from consideration on the October 15, 2018, City Council Meeting agenda. This
item will be brought back for City Council consideration at the next available City
Council meeting.
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: /0
Agenda Item No.: as ( ,7 g
o0/i57//a /TLC
n'
_ wi �J� II�
a.
City of Huntington Beach
File #: 18-411 MEETING DATE: 10/15/2018
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Marie Knight, Director of Community Services
Subject:
Approve the Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan located at the former Franklin School site
at 14422 Hammon Lane
Statement of Issue:
Community Services Commission (CSC) has reviewed and approved the Franklin Park Conceptual
Master Plan. There is now a need for City Council approval of the Conceptual Master Plan as
presented.
Financial Impact:
Not applicable. The 1.30-acre park and improvements are to be dedicated at no cost to the City.
Recommended Action:
Approve the Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan as presented.
Alternative Action(s):
Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis:
The former Franklin School site is located at 14422 Hammon Lane and currently owned by the
Westminster School District (WSD). The project site currently consists of a 9.8 acre closed school
site and a 1.52 acre park. Both the former school site and park properties are owned by the
Westminster School District, however, the City currently maintains and operates the public park.
WSD is in negotiations with Tri Pointe Homes on a land exchange that will make the former school
site available for residential development. Tri Pointe Homes has submitted a request to the
Community Development Department, Planning Division, to subdivide the property to construct 51
single-family homes on a portion of the property. A 1.30-acre neighborhood park is also being
proposed as part of the project.
City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 10/10/2018
309 powered by leoistarTI
File #: 18-411 MEETING DATE: 10/15/2018
The Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan prepared by Tri Pointe Homes was previously brought to
the Community Services Commission and approved at the June 13, 2018, meeting. That plan
consisted of a 1.15-acre park with a tot lot, surrounded by open turf and a picnic shelter area.
Residents who attended the meeting voiced their concerns about the proposed location and
orientation of park and the park acreage going from the current 1.52 acres to 1 .15 acres. Residents
wanted the new park plan to be as close as possible to its current orientation, layout, and acreage.
Residents also voiced concerns regarding the tot lot being designed for the 5-12 age group only.
Although approving the plan, Commissioners also expressed concerns with the inclusion of a large
central picnic shelter, given the problems the City is currently facing at similar picnic shelters in other
parks that have become gathering places for undesirable activities.
Based on comments received from the public and the Commission, Tri Pointe Homes revised the
park plan accordingly. Due to the significant level of changes to the park plan initially approved by
the Community Services Commission on June 13, 2018, staff brought the revised plan back to the
Commission for further review at the September 12, 2018, meeting.
Key changes included the size and the location of the park. The new design is consistent with the
orientation of the existing park, keeping it parallel to Sands Drive. The size of the park also increased
from the 1.15 acres previously proposed to 1.30 acres. Additionally, the tot lot now includes play
units designed for the 2-12 age group. Lastly, a picnic shelter is not included as part of the plan.
Other elements of the plan include open turf areas, benches, tables, and trash receptacles. The plan
also incorporates conservation designs that include a plant palette of low water use shrubs and a
picnic area surfaced with decomposed granite to reduce the amount of turf area. Overall, the
proposed design and amenities of the park are consistent with other neighborhood parks in the City
(Attachment 1). Public art is also being proposed in the park with the caveat that it be maintained in
perpetuity by a Homeowner's Association that will be formed for the new community.
To allow for the expansion of the park to 1 .30 acres, Tri Pointe has revised the proposed residential
development by reducing the number of housing units from 53 to 51. As previously reported, the
residential development at the former Franklin School site is being processed as a Plan Unit
Development (PUD) and will be conditioned to provide public benefits to the community.
Per the Quimby Act and Chapter 2.54 of the Zoning Code, a sub-division of 51 units is required to
provide 0.74 acres of undeveloped parkland. As a public benefit, Tri Pointe Homes is proposing to
dedicate the 1 .30-acre park to the City - which is 0.56 acres more than required. Tri Pointe is also
proposing to construct the park at no-cost to the City, which is also above and beyond the Quimby
Act and the requirements of Chapter 2.54 of the City's Zoning Code. If the City were to acquire and
develop 1.30 acres of parkland, the approximate cost would be $1.8 million. Additionally, as
previously stated, the Franklin Park property is owned by WSD. Should the project be approved as
proposed, the City would receive an improved park and dedication of the land in fee. This will ensure
that the City will have full control and possession of the park into the future. While the acreage will be
reduced from 1.52 acres to 1.30 acres, the City will continue to meet its park acreage standard of 5-
acres per 1 ,000 residents citywide.
It is important to note, that while the existing acreage for Franklin Park is listed at 1 .52 acres in the
City's Park Inventory, the area of the park is measured to the back of the curb. The proposed park
City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 10/10/2018
310 powered by Legtstar7l
File #: 18-411 MEETING DATE: 10/15/2018
acreage is measured to the back of the sidewalk, for a total of 1 .30 acres. Measuring the current
park boundary to the back of the sidewalk also totals 1.30 acres.
The purview of the Community Services Commission was only related to the Conceptual Master Plan
for the park and the recreational elements proposed in the park. The Commission does not have
jurisdiction or authority relating to the land dedication, the PUD, or any proposed public benefit.
All park master plans, new or updated, are approved by both the Community Services Commission
and City Council. At their September 12, 2018, meeting, the Commission issued their support of the
revised plan and made a recommendation for Council approval. Based on the recommended action
by the Commission, Council is being asked to approve the Conceptual Master Plan for Franklin Park
as presented.
Environmental Status:
The proposed project, including the public park requires the processing of a mitigated negative
declaration (MND) through the Community Development Department, Planning Division.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Improve quality of life
Attachment(s):
1. Franklin Park Conceptual Master Plan
City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 10/10/2018
311 powered by Legistur-"
I O
I iW
O J y o6p y U
LJ
IL
O p W A to I �Rf q p7
itf�
� I
Re �
,
4 ,.x 133kiLB L
IR
` r
31
Fj
Ag i:
ad51"a_ R1
`.
, f
fin
CL
4-
9-4
i
kr
t
Y N3a�'OH cmy•r4I tY-.�`..—..—..—a. k�s� JE 7....
d
W..
Ln! cc
Ic
I
N J � � rs � ":�:i3��•t(; �� 1� °� � tr.I +�» � _.f�rSr�J�' �w:r.�� #..�.�.� I
10 N U
JI O ,� • ,� a�4"° �, I — x— �.9 r , iir�.t �i
en �
_ -- - I' �`"�� ��` � ,�_:_ fir- �..: .. •,• .;; --
3AWC"INYH
�w
�aQ U �iry Q If U rI
m� h WtN W
W
W m Q w R O H O Y IW-000� F a PC_
�Z FW-ZOUJ4
€� 3 �Naa QQ� 7o ww ff LLLLJJ
J
--;j,
l � a
On
's Ic
• . U Q Q
pcD
❑a
M� I
a "
a.1 m ff
F4
= 7EM
c�� + oz93
n
t n== • Y, 7 di I
i O n V
OC�n�
2 Ww _. s: 2eV ` WwQ
CVO �r 5 p4/'
t zua pN I I
4 I waa • uW
r �,t :o I
I rT
O
tp � W W UQ
Q QQ �f
C W O
O _
uj
j. I y
to
i
� Cr„y •� - H� � I I �.
itm I
II I
;tea Wy R ow 1I
°.0e� �¢ v
u3 j � tl
� 11 ff
O
.I zr _
N
x ,
4 1 i
% — ®-- 77
—
v
ng - ;
77
}
U.1
a tii -p
�d Q
a
C Z c f Z ` Cam')
oQ
w d
tttf � rr
^^ C p f
i
I
C �i
µ � +
x
o
i
AA
Ya
S�.i�.
a #P'
w
Ito
do!t _
kr.ml
! Y
4
"1
ism
l:LCI
t '
m
^, as
it
Harper, Gloria
From: Harper, Gloria COMMUNICATION
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 3:03 PM
Subject: Harper, Gloria
1ect: Meeting Date:
1�2 LlCi� s�
Agerda Helm i40• P
Re: New important information concerning the SEA DANCE
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Inbox
tony sellas <tony.sellasCZDgmail.com>
to tltran57, John.piersma, clrwin, Molly, michelenason2014, xtraemail, christinehirschler, zippyandpeep, Jan.ewell, investorl
Hello,
The City Council meeting on 11/05/2018 for the final approval of the Sea Dance project.
i
Before the City approves this project I though you should review the information I found. Please review
and decide for yourself. t
I
If you believe it please attend the City Council meeting and speak. You will have two different opportunity
to do so for items 18-459 and 18-457.
We all have to get involved
This is our City and what happens in your back yard will eventually happen in mine.
See you on Monday.
Note. A vote for Dan Kalmick is a vote for projects like this one where the zoing wrong.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 3:10 PM tony sellas<tony.sellasagmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My name is Tony and I am a citizen of Huntington Beach. I have decided to review this project to learn
more about Planned Unit Development projects and what I found is not good.
How did I get your email address. I went to the Planning Commission's website and downloaded the
public comments letters with your email address.
This is what I found.
1. Your neighborhood is zoned as residential low density district and the zoning code is RL.
2. Planned Unit Developments (PUD) are not permitted in any RL districts.
1
3. This project requires 51 on-site parking spots on the private streets. This project is short 9
spots. To compensate for the 9 spots the project proposes using the public parking available
outside of the private community.
Attached is a presentation documenting my findings. Please review. If you agreement with my finding
then this project needs to be appealed to the City Council by the end of the workday on Friday
9/21/2018. Also send a letter of complaint to the City Manager Fred.Wilson d)-surfcity-hb.org
If you have questions please email me.
Tony
I
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify the sender immediately by email and delete the message and any file attachments from
your computer.
2
Sea Dance Residential development proiect
City Council item Nov.05,2018 City Council item#28 18-457 and 18-459
Dear Honorable City Council Members,
Please deny this project because it is fraud.
This project is inconsistent with the General Plan's definition of Residential Low Density housing and the HBZSO code Planned Unit development HBZSO code
210.12.
This project's zoning matches the zoning found in HBZSO code 230.24"Small Lot Development Standards but is being labeled as a Planned Unit Development
(PUD).
Justification:
1. See page#2-The Document supporting this project by Ursula Luna-Reynosa Community Development Director describes this project as a
Planned Unit development HBZSO code 210.12,with single family residential housing,reduced lot sizes and reduced street width.
2. See page#3—The fraud is the Planned Unit Development 210.12 does not permit:
a) Permits: Housing that is attached and are multi unit building. This would be condo and townhomes.
b) Does not permit:
I. Detached single family homes
II. Reduced street width
III. Reduced lot sizes
IV. 1 additional on-street guess parking for each house.
3. See page#4—230.24"Small Lot Development Standards" permits the following:
a) Not permitted in RL districts
b) Reduced lot sizes
c) Reduce street width
d) Shall permit an additional 1 on-street parking for each unit.This project is not providing the 1 additional parking therefore is 51 parking spots
deficient.
4. See page#5— "Smaller lots"are permitted in Medium Density residential neighborhoods and above,not in Low Density residential neighborhoods.
Document supporting this project by Ursula Luna-Reynosa Community Development Director
Reduced Lot Sizes Reduced Street Width
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission ,t i 11 ' + ft iOaK 6d
FROM: Ursula Luna-Reynosa,Community Development Director - ---
BY: Jessica Bui,Associate Planner
SUBJECT: I (t{rOpt ll�.�{k
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. i6-007, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT ��((��GGGG rr�IJIII
NO. 16-002. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18147, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT No. 16-071, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 16-002 Atypial residential street width a40ft,from a�to-cA,However,exceptions can bemade
(SEA DANCE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - Continued from July 10,
2016,: recommend Gity Council approval of proposed General to accommodate enhanced design and street layouts as long as the street widths are
Plan lend use and zoning map amendments from Public and Public-
Semipubllc to Residential Low Density and Open Space Park; to
approve a proposed Development
subdivision for 51 new single family residencesand
adequate for fire safety and access.The proposed steel width is 38It.from curb-to-arb,The
In a Plannetl Unit Development tlesign with reduced lot sins and
public benefits for the community; and Mitigated Negative
Declaration to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the Huntington Beach Fire Department has reviewed the proposed street width and has approved
proposed project located at the former Franklin School site at 1"22
Hammon Lane. the cencepival design.Street reductions from the typical 40 R,is common.Some examples
u_7— • • t!• — • ® 1ias of similar approved projects were the residential developments at Wardlow and Lamb,where
r Average Lot Width&Size street widths were approved at 36 ft wide.The proposed 38 k wide streets allow for the
The proposed average lot width is 48 ft.and the proposed average lot size is 4,787 sq.ft.The
required minimum lot width in the proposed Low Density Residential(RL)zoning designation
is 6D ft.and the minimum lot size is 6,000 sq.ft.However,Section 210.06(C)of the HBZSO
allows flexibility in minimum building site regulations when approved as part of a Planned Unit
Development(PUD).The surrounding residences have typical 60 ft.wide and 6,000 sq.ft.
lots.Despite the reduced lot widths and lot sizes,each proposed dwelling unit complies with
all other development standards in the RL zoning designation such as setbacks,lot coverage,
height,parking,and landscaping requirements.
210.12 Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions
This section establishes supplemental development standards and pronsrons that shall apply to all planned unit
developmears. Planned Unit development HBZSO code 210.12
A planned unit do elopmem shall provide a mutual benefit for the residents of the project as well as the general public. Permits:
Examples of public benefits that may be provided m a planed unit do elopment include.but are nit limited to tie eteaGon
of permanem open space,usable and appropriately looted recreation facilities,the conservation of nanual elemedt,tad 1. Housing that i s attached and are multi unit
features and enerpy;and otter public tmprovmn .(3885-&10) building. This would be condo a n d
A Maps A tematrve and final or parcel an shall be approved pursuant to Title 25;SubdivistonL tow n h o m e s.
S Project Design
I Dmeuay parkmp for a r atntmttm of 50oio of the units shall be provided Ma units are=dyA side Does not permit:
r>de 1. Detached single family homes
A maximum of six units may be atlaclied side by side and an offset on the front of the p a mmi�m 2. Reduced street width
of four feet for every Iw0 units shall be provided
3 A minimum of one-tltird of the roof area wit}un a trtuhi-story..multi-unit building shall be ow stay less is3. Reduced lot sizes
height than the remaining portion of the strurnce's roof area
4. the mtmber of required parking spaces for each dweU=unit shall be provided m accord2ace with
Chapter231 Inaddition,one ornineofdefoilowmgahananveparkingcoafiguruiaesmaybepermittediva Per the CUP and the tentative track map this
planned unit developmem rf,t is determined that such conhgurat=and location thereof wtl be accessible and project is a Small lot development which is
useful in conatamn%-A the proposed dwelling units of the development:
a. Required enclosed spaces maybe provided m a tandem configuration provided that to mmianm zoned b e H B ZS 0 code 230.24 "Small Lot
parking Wedtmensroos comply wrth Samoa 231.14 1 Development Standards"
b. Required open spaces maybe provided with a combination of off-street and on-street spaces as Ian¢
as the total number of required parking spans is provided with the development sin
ZONING,aDDE
2ON rnc�gn emNS APPYIN G 1N/i,OR SEVER DISTIMT5
Cwty in7 OE STAND
Amae'.aMMLQ= The Sea Dance project is a small lot project.
a'°"&mdL`°°"inpoWS'ndads 230.24 Small Lot Development Standards are:
A Peened Les.llte folowing small lot dnxlopmrm srandnds rc prmidd n m ahaomvx m atta�adYrntite inteYfam7pdioiaa lamp bt
dndapmmts are pcmwcd m RKlWH.and RH DrstrscL(aju*RL Dmrm ad HIE ASu&MM)nds)eteea,paaldaCmamw Ue Pam � 1) Not permitted in RL districts
acd=memapMv PlamuagC "` 7beDmpRnwa Board shslltn and forward trxnmmmdammadludk+iP.rPpmr 2) Reduced lot sizes
pw to Plmug Cocna n attain Am emdrds shall apple to all small lot subdnmms,whtlha Ile temmvx map u denpedv A#x&wA pa Ink a
multiple uom pa la(cmdamrmml 3) Reduce street width
B. Desp Smtdardt.The following uandards shall he couvdad h the Plmmng Cotows oa pamr to dmelopow apptmat
I. Arditecmml fcamtes and genial appearamx o[theRopaddnxlnpmcm shall m6aoce the orderly ad ha®otom dn&pmmt ofdr aAe 4) Shall permit an additional 1 On-street
cammilavasawdek parking for each unit. This project is not
2. .4c5sremcd feama and romplmeatny orlon shall h mcoapmated vino the desi�of all Buena sutfres of the Mu4hop m to
� axle
-1-9lyPlPr�a providing the 1 additional parking therefore
malk,w& is 51 parking spots deficient.
C D"dep.se Shndds The fallowl staodards shall apple to all small Im inslepta�
%t=m bmldmg to or W see
Strxt senom
Sort It Cm shall rnvw proposed smn mms upm suhmnnl of the ter aw map and
coodd m use peme apphcatmm.lda 3613 cab to ewb ma}be pammed prmded
all tmo m the dnebpmmt are egmp*wnh amammc sprAki*st o Oo-strxl
parking shall be provided on both sides of the stm
Reamed pAq Small Id dnelalanems shall provide patkmp Coassstmt Wd single houly«vdedul
dnxlapmmts spxAod w Chapter 231>a addmoq woonum I�sfad space pa al
for guest unto parking shall be provided A pAq plan depicuop the locwm of all
pasbop spaces shall be sutmsted wills the coadmmal ux pc=appdscmm
General Plan
Dow Density Residenhai
Density range up to 7 0 units/acre
The Low Density Residential designation provides for
traditional detached single-family housing, zero-lot-line e
developments, mobile home parks. low-density senior Per the General Plan description, "Smaller lot"
housing,and accessory dwelling units or"granny"flats development projects are permitted in Medium
Medlum Density Residential Density Residential.
Density range:>7.0-15.0 uruts7acre
The Medium Density Residential designation provides
for uses allowed with the Low Density Residgntial-
designation, as well as smaller lot detached single-
family housing, zero-lot-line developments, attached
single-family housing leg,duplexes, townhomes), and lower-density mulliple-family
housing,such as garden apartments.
Medium Hqh Density Resdentiai
Density range >15.0-25.0 unrts/acre
The Medium High Density Residential designation
provides for uses allowed in the Low and Medium Density
Residentlal designations as well as attached single-family
housing(e g,townhomes),and a fm ted range of multiple-
family housing(e.g,garden apartments.lofts).
2.8 `Y City of Huntington Beach General Plan Adopted October 2,2017)