Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Element to General Plan 81-3 & EIR 81-6 Res 5060
RESOLUTION NO. 5060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING LAND USE ELEMENT AMEND- MENT NO. 81-3 TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives; and A public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 to the General Plan was held by the Planning Commission on November 17, 1981, and approved for recommendation to the City Council; and Thereafter, the City Council, after giving notice as pre- scribed by Government Code section 65355, held at least one pub- lic hearing to consider said Land Use Element No. 81-3; and At said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring - � to be heard on said amendment were heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7, Chapter 3, Article 6 of the California Government Code, com- mencing with section 65350, that Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 to the General Plan consisting of the following changes is hereby adopted: 1. That 10.1 acres located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street be redesignated from Open Space to General Commercial and that implementing zoning for the area be qualified with a "Q" prefix in order to achieve an appearance compatible with adjacent open space uses and/or to limit uses. 2. That 4.0 acres of the 9. 6. acre area, located approxi- mately 600 feet south of Talbert Avenue and 1500 feet west of Beach Boulevard, be redesignated from Industrial to High Density Residential and that the remaining 5.6 acres of said area be retained as Industrial; that access from the 4.0 acres be taken ahb 12/10/81 1. e ..�. . r..-j a �YNN 2.1 \ '.2 •MYI •RMY •�• 1YMl�OM I' i Areas of Concern 0 0 huntington beach planning division 3. Figure 2-1 2229 . 7ALRER7 1, R �� (Y ( RI I MI-CD ;�R 1 .. . RI RI RI RI I , f �. CF-R ( d CF-R ° i MI-CD r l=1 I RA-0-CD RA-0-CD MI MI, I RA-0-CD i MI CF-C LU-0-CD LU-0-CO, U-O-CD LU-O-CD LU-O-CD U-0-CD rLU-01-CD JID M I-C D MI LU 0 CD LU-0-CD J MI.cD s I` c i _- ELLIS l •\� U-0-CD U-0-CD MI-Oi L M1 RA �N U-0-co _ Lu-o co RA-0-CDI ..oc RA _CD L RA-a-col RA-Co 4 Q M I-0 !RA-0 RA-0 J J 1 i RA-O-C�l MI-0 0_ RA-0 320_. U RA-0-CD,LU-O-CD i ERNEST m AVE 3ao:1 MI-0-CD I.. MI-CD- ~ I MI-A-CD MI-0 MI-0 RA-01 'il RA-01 RA-0-CD A CD 0 31 'xze TO C RA-0-CD `_-i+ni I� Sao R5 AV E. UT GARFIELD Area of Concern 2 .1 0 o O 4. Figure 2-2 2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN This section addresses the two request areas designated in Figure 2-1. 2.1 NORTHWEST CORNER OF GOLDENWEST STREET AND ELLIS AVENUE 2.1.1 Background. The first area of concern addressed by Land Use Element Amendment 81-3 is a 10.1 acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. The property is currently designated for open space use in the City's Land Use Element and for planned open space development in the City's Open Space and Conservation Element. The zoning on the property is RA-O-CD, Residential Agricultural, combined with an oil and a civic district suffix (Figure 2.2). The RA zone is transitional in nature, indicating that the property is to be rezoned to conform with the Land Use Element prior to development. Until recently, the property was one of several areas under consideration for inclusion into Huntington Central Park. At its August 17, 1981 meeting, the City Council voted not to include the area of concern within the park boundaries at this time. Staff was directed to consider a commercial use of the property that would be .consistent with the park. Subsequent to this Council decision, the property owner, A. C. Marion, requested a change in general plan designation from open space to general commercial. The applicant has further requested that a change in zoning to permit commercial uses be considered concurrently with the General Plan Amendment. In addition to amending the land, use designation on this site, staff is processing an amendment to remove the area from the City's Open Space and Conservation Plan. 5. CF - R PARK in w 3 z w y 0 OPEN SPA E I AVE ELLI I S MUM ESTATE RESII ENTIAL Z UN/GACI II EST ;TE RESID,rNTIAL T - i d4 UN/GACI Area of Concern 2 . 1 0 0 6. Figure 2-3 The following analysis considers two alternative land use designations: 1) open space and 2) general commercial. The area of concern currently contains horse stables and an exercise area for approximately 50 horses. Property to the north of the study area is part of Huntington Central Park and is currently vacant. Property to the west of the study area also contains horse stables, however, it is designated for Central Park acquisition. The future use of these areas immediately north and west of the study area will be determined when a schematic plan for Huntington Central Park is adopted. Property to the east of the study area, across Goldenwest Street, is designated as open space. The 2.7 acres at the northeast corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street is zoned Ml-CD and contains a car repair business. The area .north and east of this Ml-CD property contains the Mushroom Farm and the Sully-Miller Lake. These areas have been placed in a planning mode for six months and may ultimately be acquired for Central Park. The property directly south of the area of concern contains a horse stable. It is part of a larger area that is designated estate residential 2 dwelling units per acre). Staff is currently preparing a specific plan for these properties to implement the estate residential designation. Objectives of this specific plan include preserving the topography of the area and accommodating equestrian uses. 2.1.2 Analysis 1. Land Use If the existing open space designation on the area of concern is retained an appropriate implementing zone would be ROS, Recreation Open Space. This would permit the development of a commercial recreation use such as a tennis and racquetball club, swimming pool, three-par golf course, country club or other similar use. The type of facilities and amount of building square footage would vary according to the proposed use. A redesignation of the area of concern to general commercial would result in ten acres of commercial uses. A ten-acre site typically accommodates either a large neighborhood shopping center or a small community shopping center. Total building square footage of commercial use could range from 88,567 to 100,519 square feet on the area of concern. The City Council has indicated its intent that commercial uses on the site be compatible with Central Park. Uses in the 300-acre park currently include two recreational lakes, several children play areas, jogging and equestrian trails, two food concessions, a nature center and significant areas for passive recreation. Current plans call for expansion of the park to 330 acres and the addition of new recreation uses including an equestrian center, athletic fields, and a YMCA. Commercial uses compatible with the park could include restaurants and specialty shops to serve park users. Stores specializing in equestrian supplies could serve the proposed equestrian uses both in Central Park and in the area south of Ellis Avenue. 7. i I 2. Economic Considerations The Planning staff in cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc., conducted a fiscal impact analysis of the two land use alternatives using the computerized methodology developed for the City. For purposes of analysis, the revenues and expenditures for both alternatives were projected over a ten year period, 1981-1991. The results are detailed in Appendix A. A second economic concern is the market support for the proposed land uses considered in this amendment. Due to time constraints a detailed market analysis for the site was not conducted. The City may want to require that such a study be done prior to development. An economic feasibility study of revenue producing uses proposed for Huntington Central Park (including the area of concern) was recently conducted for the City by Ultrasystems, Inc.1 The data and conclusions from this study provide some useful general information regarding demand for recreation and commercial uses on the study area. Under an open space designation, one potential use for the site is a tennis and racquetball club. The feasibility study indicates that while private clubs have been extremely popular in recent years, there are more than sufficient private and public courts available in the Huntington Beach area to satisfy existing demand. A modest increase in demand is expected due to projected population increases, however, not enough to support the addition of new racquetball and/or tennis facilities. Another commercial recreation use studied in the market analysis is a four to seven acre mini amusement park including such uses as a miniature golf course, batting cages, pinball arcade, water slides and other small scale entertainment facilities. The report concludes that such an amusement center would have a low probability of being profitable in the Central Park area. Primary factors for a successful venture of this type are visibility from a freeway and location in a densely developed residential area. The area of concern meets neither of these criteria. The outlook for general and/or specialty commercial uses on the area of concern is more optimistic. The study area is located at the intersection of a major and a primary arterial with good visibility. There are several potential commercial needs in the vicinity of the study area which are not . being met. For example, the Central Park feasibility study indicates sufficient demand from the local population for over 12,000 square feet of high--quality dinner restaurant space. This dinner restaurant will not be provided in Central Park according .to the proposed development plan presented to the City Council on September 8, 1981. The market for such a facility could be served by a restaurant located on the area of concern. 1 Ultrasystems, Inc., Final Report on an Economic Feasibility Analysis of Proposed Revenue Producing Uses to be Located Within Huntington Central Park, May, 1981. 8. —, to the northeast with no access onto Redondo Lane; that a buffer area be provided consisting of more than open space, i.e. , walls and landscaping; and that a focused environmental impact report with a noise study be prepared at the project level. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st C day of December, 1981 . I Mayor t ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM: _ V City Clerk City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED: r t Ile-Lu _ City Administrator' rector of evelopment Services i - 3 E s t 1 f 1 1 I I ' I 2. Is, No. 5060 r -� STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) f I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of December 19 81 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: MacAllister, Thomas, Pattinson, Finley, Bailey, Mandic, Kelly NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California WIN UKAFT LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT 81m3 Environmental Impact Report 81 - 6 huntington beach department of development services 1z/ei TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Methodology 1 2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN 5 2.1 Northwest Corner of Goldenwest Street and 5 Ellis Avenue 2.2 Beach-Talbert Area 13 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES 25 . 3.1 Short-Term and Long-Term Productivity 25 3.2 Irreversible Environmental Changes 26 3.3 Growth Inducing Impacts 26 APPENDICES Land Use Categories AMENDMENTS PLANNING COMM. CITY COUNCIL RESIDENTIAL DATE RESOLUTION DATE RESOLUTION Estate <_2 un/gac 11.6-76 U87 12-6-76 4368 6-7-77 1196 8-1-77 4484 Estate <_4 un/gac 9-2977 1202 11-7-77 4551 12-6-77 1206 12-19-77 4572 � Low Density <7 un/gac 8-1-78 1232 8-21-78 4660 6 10-1778 1236 11-6-78 4696 - PW Medium Density <_15 un/gac II LI-78 1239 12-18-78 470e _-6-79 1242 3-19 7 5 9 4728 per° `�"`°r High Density >15 Un/gaC 3 3-18-80 1261 4-7-80 4865 ti} ^ 3•• f 10-21-80 1268 12-15-80 4936 COMMERCIAL 5-19-81 1273 6-15-81 5005 ®General Office Professional © Mixed Development INDUSTRIAL \ Genera ...................................... : ; I PUBLIC USE :::::::::::::: :s:::s:::: ... 1 ubh Institutional Public,6luasi-p c I �i e :•0.. a open en Space �aR. y ::::at:::: PLANNING UNITS Reserve ........................... 1. • \ Planning Re e ......... ...... ............ . Community. . .... ................ .... P coon OTHER� esoEurce Produ R u r 9 J t. a Hllyyq� wy 7 •Y•I r t'v r r et l f s f 5 7. °EiSii `�i•i� yi.:a,/��.✓ a roc \ /f i u x •' Ilk \ / �♦*':., ���6 tJ>L� • r � PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY ! / ii :.1{ci::1i:1r.:?•.. :d'r,+l'u f,0{ Or A I Fq Land Use m the Coastal Zone Sce Local Coastal Fan r y a ..� B.erig Revised by the County of orange \ 1 the Coastal Zora See Local Coastal Plan. For Land Use'n , r Y f Lc)• t�l � jS� i, i p OCEAN PACIFIC j PACIFIC ' OCEAN GENERAL PLAN HUNfINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA I LAND USE DIAGRAM 1 ' PWNNING DEPARTMENT Adopted December 1 � Revised JUNE 198 Land Use Categories RESIDENTIAL DEstate s2un/gac lU Estate <_4 un/gac Low Density<_7un/gac ®Medium Density<_15un/gac High Density>15 un/gac COMMERCIAL ®General ME Visitor-Serving ®Mixed Development MIXED USES Office/Residential ME Commercial/Support Recreation INDUSTRIAL General Resource Production OPEN SPACE Water W Conservation Recreation OTHER USES EH Public,Quasi-Public,lnstitutional p?� Planned Community Ea` "A P f�a �p.0 wry =Planning Reserve Industrial Energy Production Q,P ! 1 P` ' p�� ••••••Coastal Zone Boundary . Him s �o O y r p lTS II , \ g(.p �� f�xl�� pOp af�r� �'jp,�i If1 4'qo Irl riw �! �4i�lr'i�tAd�yJyi+!`� BFgc s . i�• • \ e• gyepai l�/ n P,� y,7` -,e .: .. ..,. \. ^F .......... i .............. Hill Iii s .: Y I / h PACIFIC COAST - y'Z'/�91•�; ,;,-,..z�.N' ... HWY OCEAN ea7E:Gmeret smo�sryu� Say _ ..., .. PACIFIC I OCEAN -- "tea. .o•r. - V: •yam• �Na�v�Dcpo�;�l;0 PACIFIC «nsiee mo coos zano ere ... ssN. ' ' i oi• sln.n I«.•r«eoc•«•oozes. T vn H NTIN T U G ON BE4CH C4LIFORNIA Local Coastal Program PLANNING DIVISION Land Use Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report concerns Amendment 81-3 to the Land Use Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The Land Use Element was adopted as a mandated element of the General Plan in December, 1973; this is the seventeenth amendment to the element. Planned land uses throughout the City are depicted in the attached Land Use Diagram. 1.1 METHODOLOGY This amendment considers changes in General Plan designations on two sites. The first area is a 10.1 acre site located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. The second area is a 9.6 acre site located approximately 330 feet south of Talbert Avenue and approximately 1,300 feet west of Beach Boulevard. The amendment requests on these two areas will be analyzed in terms of the existing conditions on the site, anticipated impact on surrounding areas, major land uses and environmental issues, and consistency with adopted City goals and policies. Section 15148 of the State EIR Guidelines states that "The requirements for an EIR on a local general plan element or amendment thereof will be satisfied by the general plan or element document and no separate EIR will be required if: 1) the general plan addresses all the points required to be in an EIR by Article 9 of the State EIR Guidelines, and 2) the document contains a special section or a cover sheet identifying where the general plan document addresses each of the points required." In conformance with State guidelines, this document will constitute the EIR for Land Use Element Amendment B1-3. The environmental setting and significant impacts associated with the issue areas identified in the initial study are addressed under each area of concern (Sections 2.1. and 2.2). Alternative land use designations and feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant effects are also discussed in these sections. 1. Section 3.0 addresses overall environmental changes related to the following considerations: 1) the relationship between local short-term productivity; 2) irreversible or unavoidable environmental changes; and 3) growth inducing impacts. 2. Secondly, the area of concern is located in a part of the City that is a focal point for equestrian uses. Commercial stables located in the immediate vicinity of (but not including) the study area currently provide boarding for over 250 horses, riding lessons and areas for exercise and shows. While the majority of these stables are located south of Ellis Avenue and may not continue in their same locations permanently, planning efforts for the area envision the continuance of equestrian uses either on individual lots or in centralized facilities. An equestrian center for approximately 250 horses is also planned to be located in Central Park on the northeast corner of Ellis Avenue and Edwards Street. There are currently no major outlets for equestrian oriented supplies in the vicinity of the study area. Potential uses include feed and grain stores, saddle and tack shops, western clothing stores and specialty shops offering miscellaneous riding accessories. Thirdly, development of the estate-residential area south of Ellis Avenue will create demand for convenience and possibly neighborhood commercial uses. At ultimate development, the 300-acre estate residential area south of Ellis Avenue will generate an estimated population of 2,500 persons. However, no existing or proposed convenience commercial centers are located within a half .mile radius of most of this future residential area. The nearest commercial centers to the site are located at Main Street and Ellis Avenue, at Yorktown Avenue and Goldenwest Street, and at Warner Avenue and Goldenwest Street. Commercial uses such as a small market and drug store will most likely be needed in the immediate area at ultimate development. 3. Housing The Land Use Alternatives considered in this Amendment will not add to the City's housing stock. The area of concern, however, has always been general planned for open space use rather than for residential development. A redesignation to general commercial will, thus, not be removing any land previously available for residential use. 4. Public Services and Utilities a. Sewers An eight inch sewer currently exists in Goldenwest Street north of Ellis Avenue. Recent studies by the Department of Public Works indicate that this sewer may not be adequate to accommodate sewage generated at ultimate development of the tributary area. A parallel 12 inch pipe in Goldenwest Street is proposed in order to accommodate future development. Construction of this twelve inch sewer may be required at the time street improvements are made to Goldenwest Street. An eight inch sewer in Ellis Avenue will also be required to serve the area of concern under either of the two land use alternatives. 9. b. Water Water mains in the vicinity of the study area include a 12 inch main in Ellis Avenue and a 14 inch main in Goldenwest Street. These existing mains can provide adequate water service to the site under either of the two land use alternatives. C. Storm drains Surface runoff from the site to Goldenwest Street will provide adequate drainage under either of the two land use alternatives. d. Police and Fire protection Fire protection for the area of concern is provided by the City of Huntington Beach from the Gothard Station located north of Ellis Avenue on the west side of Gothard Street. The area of concern lies within the five minute response area of. the station and can be adequately serviced regardless of the selected alternative. e. Gas and Electrical Utilities Natural gas service is provided by the Southern California Gas Company. Extension of existing lines in the vicinity of the study area will provide adequate gas service under both of the proposed land use alternatives. The Gas Company notes, however, that gas supply may be affected by the overall availability of natural gas and by State and federal regulatory policies. Electrical service is provided by the Edison Company. Adequate electric power supply can be provided from 12 KV distribution lines in the vicinity of the area of concern. Edison notes that the total electrical system demand is expected to continue to increase annually and if plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities are delayed, Edison's capability to serve all customer loads during peak ,demand periods could become marginal by the mid-1980's. f. Solid Waste Disposal The Rainbow Disposal Company provides solid waste collection to the City of Huntington Beach. No local service contraints are expected under any of the land use designations. 5. Traffic Circulation Access to the area of concern is taken via Ellis Avenue which is designated as a primary arterial. The property also fronts on Goldenwest Street, a designated major arterial. Present traffic volumes for these arterials in the vicinity of the study area are 430 daily trips on Ellis Avenue and 20,000 daily trips on Goldenwest Street. The maximum design capacities for these arterials are 30,000 and 45,000 vehicle trips per day, respectively. 10. Using factors contained in the February, 1980 Huntington Beach Transportation Demand Model report and in the Institute of Transportation Engineers 1979 Informational Report, it is estimated that development of the study area as recreation will result in approximately 1,874 vehicle trips per day with 2,710 to 3,076 trips predicted for a general commercial development. Neither Ellis Avenue nor Goldenwest Street is .currently improved to its ultimate design standard. Once improvements are made, projected traffic volumes from the. two alternatives are expected to produce no significant impacts. Some signal modifications may be required at the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street under either of the two land use alternatives. Bus service to the area of concern is provided by the Orange County Transit District's (OCTD) Route 25. OCTD recommends that a bus stop be located on the nearside of Goldenwest Street at Ellis Avenue and that a bus turnout be considered at ultimate development of the site. 6. Environmental Issues a. Noise Noise levels of Ldn 65 and Ldn 60 extend into the Southern portion of the site from Ellis Avenue and levels of Ldn 70, Ldn 65 and Ldn 60 extend into the eastern portion of the site from Goldenwest Street. These levels fall within the normally acceptable range for both commercial recreation and general commercial uses. No significant noise impacts are anticipated to occur from either of the proposed land uses. The study area is bordered by Central Park on two sides, however, and care should be taken at the project level to protect potential passive recreational use of the park from excess noise due to commercial recreation or general commercial uses on the study site. b. Air Quality Both land use alternatives would adversely affect air quality within the South Coast region; however, the impact is not expected to be significant. Projected daily emissions from the two alternatives are as follows: Emission Tons of Source Emissions/Day OPEN SPACE Mobile .26 Stationary Negl. Total .26 GENERAL COMMERCIAL Mobile .43 Stationary Negl. Total .43 Source: Huntington Beach Planning Division, .1981 11. C. Seismic The area of concern lies within the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone and is traversed by the Bolsa-Fairview Fault. This fault is a potential cause of serious structural damage due primarily to ground shaking. Actual displacement and surface rupture has not historically occurred along this fault system in Huntington Beach and the probability is relatively low that it will within the next 100 years, even though one or more moderate-sized earthquakes may occur. In compliance with the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazards Zones Act of 1972, a Special Studies Zone has been established in Huntington Beach that includes the most hazardous earthquake faults. This special studies zone does not extend into the study area. Development in the study area, therefore, need not be subject to the zone's requirements. It will be appropriate to address the mitigation of potential seismic hazards in the study area when,a specific project is proposed for development. 2.1.3 Staff Recommendation The City Council has indicated that the area of concern is not proposed for inclusion into Huntington Central Park. The open space designation on the site is no longer appropriate and significantly limits the uses permitted on this privately owned property. As discussed in the text, many commercial recreation uses which could be developed on the site under the open space designation would have a low probability of being profitable. A general commercial designation on the area of concern would allow for a profitable use of the site which, if carefully planned, could compliment the recreational and equestrian uses proposed in Central Park and in the estate residential area south of _Ellis Avenue. The site is highly visible from Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue, and it will be important that the design of any development on the site be compatible with the open space and rural atmosphere that the City is trying to create in this area. The mix of uses in any commercial development on the site is also of concern if the center is to serve recreation and equestrian uses. Staff recommends that the area of concern be redesignated from open space to general commercial. Staff further recommends that a specific plan be prepared for the site as opposed to applying one of the City's existing commercial zoning districts. This specific plan would set forth special regulations governing .landscaping, building bulk and height, building materials, design of signs and/or other concerns as necessary to achieve a visual appearance compatible with adjacent open space uses. The specific plan would also deliniate the commercial uses which would be allowed on the site in order to promote in mix of uses that will serve equestrian activities and visitors to Central Park. Staff_ recommends a target date of January 31, 1982 for adoption of the specific plan. 12. 2.1.4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that 10.1 acres located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street be redesignated from open space to general commercial and that implementing zoning for the area be qualified with a "Q" prefix in order to achieve an appearance compatible with adjacent open space uses and/or'to limit uses. 2.2 BEACH/TALBERT AREA 2.2.1 Background The second area of concern addressed by Land Use Element Amendment 81-3 is a 9.6 acre site owned by the City of Huntington Beach located approximately 1,500 feet west of Beach Boulevard and 600 feet south of Talbert Avenue. The site is designated industrial and zoned Ml-A, Restricted Manufacturing. (Figure 2-4) Approximately four acres of this area is proposed as a site for the former Old Civic Center senior housing project and will entail the construction of 155 subsidized senior citizen apartments in a three-story structure and possibly 45 additional market rate. units. This high density residential use would not be consistent with the site's industrial designation. The City Attorney's office and the State Office of Planning and Research indicate that a project on City-owned property can override the local general plan and zoning. However, the proposed project is to be financed through the California Housing Finance Agency, and this agency has indicated that the project must be consistent with the City's General Plan and zoning before any funds are released. Rather than analyze an amendment on four acres, staff is expanding the area of concern to include the entire 9.6 acre site owned by the City and is analyzing the following four land use alternatives: 1) Industrial, 2) Medium Density Residential, 3) High Density Residential, and 4) High Density Residential on 4.0 acres, Industrial on 5.6 acres (see Figures 2-5, 2-6 and 2-7). The 9.6 acre site is currently vacant. Adjacent uses include an industrial park and lumber yard to the west, industrial development to the north, a five-acre neighborhood park to the south and a low density condominium development (6.5 dwelling units per acre) to the east. There is also an area of land east of the site which contains several older single family dwelling units and is designated for medium density residential. 13. I & .3 R3 31 R3 I$L R3 ] R3 2L-Lj A 4:..- LJ LJ J21 1 o. , J-L --'fBLATER en d e�' FC4 2R2R2 MHc �,�oKj I so R2 N-LINE of TRACT .6e2O" U f l L R I n°sau DR()J o R3 RI y RI— SPEER ,y ie. 29.dmp] Tc" "NR . 1 ✓ Q M I R 2 ' NfrILIBE -dY g� M I R3 RT r • R2 NDBLE DR � R2 ~ oW - R I �EL,RRoo I 3O o. NEKM4h ACE W°:t R2 1 lsMi R2 3>0 zee R5 i SP— I� - RONALD DR eo MI-CD iI_ - R2 N-LINE 6Ve eve er V. u e[C.2e-e-11 � ffi I., u R3 R3 _ R2-PD-U iR2 R2 R3S J R ca S P— I (Q)RA}3 rt $ Rs R5o$ RI ]O 4 Mp T q _— MI—CD r : F 3°o RI W 5 Rl eo = T RI w CF—E LA ° RI MFA (Q)R2—PD C4 I,:REO'. ::'<A9CNOOLI R1 , Aor RI RI s I :_:F;: :.ti , RI ::. ;:: R I T N AV M I—C D M I— RI` x R I RI R RI RI RI g ` i RI-PD 1 CF-R i I :lciaecc€-_o. -'RI " C2 1 0 ,e.,T•.,. ....J , �g: ) KI R - AVENUE KI A AV N.L 40T—R w RI RI %--- RI ~ RI „ : 31700 M I so ATL.,a LE If W MI ONTARIO DR ' RI C 2 RI RI RI RI NTr a I& —A2 a RI 0 RI ,RI PD e . R2 MI DeN OR - _�oueeec DR RI RI ay.3 sooa " RI >f 13 e3 R3 � RI M L nor n ALBERTAAI OR�I ^ R3 "I i6. ? C4�© R3 �.7Dlec -.ANC RI RI V RI RI r g ��� FRANKLIN OR V - R2 i RI RI—PI M I i T KON OR R� RS a� 04 RI b RI RI 8 r D. I N ' R2 e- S S R2 \ V PPPLfBru RI R3 RI r R2 R7 „ R3 a ..R2 -_nweo:v- auP.oir i se RI �i�; 1TM� --�— I R2 T >_ - -- -- 8 --- - ------- MI �` = ------- -:-R3 S R3 R2 �. 30: L ; .y'MI-o1 R2 C �� c2 f-- M, 2 C4 R2' ea R3 R---.J R5 ..-.�... �M ��RE �R ;aKtt1N., R,• R3 ' RJ MH M2-0 R3 : JR2 R2 !� g �� R�.•--:::3zeTs'To / .I - R.4i !•I '!,IF-I.F� 7 S i R3 - Area of Concern 202 0 0 Figure 2-4 14 . 2.2:2 Analysis: 1. Land Use The existing industrial designation and zoning on the site could result in an industrial park containing approximately 158,429 square feet of building space for light manufacturing uses. Such a development would generate roughly 218 . employees. . A redesignation to medium density residential could result in a maximum.of 15 units per acre or a total of 144 units and would generate an estimated population of 405 persons. A high density residential designation' would accommodate the proposed Senior, Citizens Center which would result in approximately 200 dwelling units and an estimated population of 356 persons. The density of this project on four acres would be approximately 50 dwelling units per acre. The remaining 5.6 acres of the site could result in approximately 35 dwelling units per acre or a total of 196 units and would generate an estimated: population of 349 persons. In: the fourth alternative, the 4.0 acres,of high density residential. would, again, accommodate the proposed Senior Citizen Center as described above (200 dwelling units, 356 persons). The 5.6 acres of industrial could result in 92,417 square feet of building, space for- light manufacturing uses and would generate an estimated 127 employees. An industrial use of the site would be compatible with the existing industrial developments to the north and west. Industrial use of the study area may, however, adversely impact the low and medium density residential areas to. the east and Terry Park to the south. Light manufacturing uses of the.type permitted in an M17A zone could possibly be developed without significant adverse impacts on these properties if adequate. setbacks, berms, landscaping or other buffering techniques.are incorporated. A residential use of the site at either medium or high density, may not be compatible with the industrial properties located to the north and west. Special attention to project design to minimize incompatibilities from the aesthetics, noise and traffic of adjacent industrial uses will be important. A medium density residential use would be compatible with the existing low density and proposed medium density residential developments to the east and with Terry Park to the . south. A high density residential development, including. the Senior Citizen's Center would be less compatible .with adjacent low. and medium density residential uses although. proper layout of the project and adequate buffers could most likely mitigate any potential incompatibilities. 2. Economic Considerations The planning staff, in cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc., conducted a fiscal impact analysis of the four land use alternatives using the computerized methodology developed for the City. For purposes of analysis, the revenues and expenditures of each alternative were projected over a ten-year period, 1981-1991. The results are .detailed in Appendix A. 15. mill ml III 11 1 11/1 1 111A� t1111�111� �la nN n u� Igllllll� Illln � 1, N IIIIIII IlalilNNll MINI 11 MHNI�IIHIIIIIII/11111�11 111 H/1' - �IINIIIINIIpp a11111111 11 NIIINIIHIII 11111111111111 11 11�1�;r trtgI11111111H1 IIIIItIN111tIN IIIIitI IH I , eulllllllllil� IIIlilllllllue1111111111111 j� 1 IIIIIi/fl/ f11f1/ /1/IIIN IY�jlf/fil • Ifl11111N11111111111�If�111111 pi IIIIIIIN1111111 � 1 Ia11�111111111111111�11�11111111NIn1�11�111� I�NNIIIIIINIHIIIIIIII111111IIIIIIInII"IN01 111 m IwI1NIlI111111111111H11t1111111�pIIIIIIIun i �• �IMIMNIHIIIIIIIIIIIHIINIIIIIIIIIIl111111111111 Iala1I11111111111111/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIINININIIIiIII � 111111111�11111�1�1111111/�111111�1111111/1111�1��1' _ 1 - a vv law s III IIIIIIIIIIIIiI I ti.;"k>•:�+` •:vg�r.�•.a �'•`•: = 'a.2iti INPUSTRIAL ' Y i Terry: Park i EVA . O� login isiellooiiii■ 11110 woman ONE IN■ ice � - . omega ii■ �/I��1 �������■ GIs ®® ■MINI N i �� ice : 1i's3ia'x_sss - ti:aa�'se-e_e_=s�s_� 'EE-g��as��'s33 °3aa�-ss:z =aseaemg= I f E:eaa �m3�r3sa9�=fig :zsa�see3e__ �, sa ssx 1 r •����■ 111111111111= �•��'�■ 1111111111111 :_ I in ■��i ■ 11111■■�� L■Bo■■ 11111 ■ ., ■Boom" I j ��' /1f ■■q��■H /11111�� �� .. :, ��1 H■■�■1■ NIr111 a t -iTi�-SCSZSS ------------ nil 1111111111111 = :111�C i1111��111111 . I;� '11��� ■ ��I IC i �i t ■. + �! 11111■■■'� !�■R■■■ i i11 1■■■ Ron '' � - p� a■e��■1� /11�11� � � �-------------Lam---- MB£RT t --- gAVEA" i H �I o a N M' ss� T _.-] - : f : INDUSTRIAL Proposed access to ' <: .... Talb ert Ave : :.... . . .. . ..:.. ... . . .. .. .. . nue ...........::::.::: ......::::::::::.::::.:.::::::::...:.. i:::::::::::<*"_: ij ....: ..:..........:::............ ...'r.r malt' `: •.�:::::::.:::: :.>:::::: ...:>:.....:::::: plOLM�O. CMCL '•.':'rir:r i:: i HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Proposed access to Taylor Drive Terry Park I I I Area of Concern 2.2 - Alternative 4 18. Figure 2-7 3. Housing In 1979, the City adopted a state-mandated revision to the Housing Element of the General Plan which includes policy aimed at increasing housing opportunities for households with low and moderate incomes. The revised element includes provisions for consideration of an inclusionary zoning ordinance that could require a certain percentage of new residential developments to be affordable to lower income households. The element also indicates a special need for affordable housing for. elderly households. As of 1979 there were a total of 6,722 households in Huntington Beach headed by elderly persons. Nearly half of these households were low income, and approximately 56 percent of these low income households were paying greater than 25 percent of their income for housing. An industrial use on the entire area of concern would not add to the City's housing stock. The site, however, is currently designated industrial, and retaining this designation does not remove any area previously planned for residential uses. Alternative two, medium density would expand the existing stock of vacant land available for housing as well as the City's potential to provide affordable housing. This designation could result in the addition of 144 units. Adoption of an inclusionary zoning ordinance could potentially require that approximately 28 of these units be affordable to low or moderate income families. A high density designation on the entire 9.6 acre site would result in the addition of the 155 affordable units associated with the Senior Citizens Center plus an additional 196 or more units on the remaining 5.6 acres. Application of an inclusionary zoning ordinace to these units could result in an additional 40-low and moderate income units. Under alternative four, the high density residential designation on 4.0 acres would accommodate the 155 affordable senior citizen housing units. The remaining 5.6 acres in industrial use would not add to the City's housing stock. 4. Public Services and Utilities a. Sewers Existing sewers in the vicinity of the study area include eight inch sewers in Talbert Avenue, Redondo Circle and Kovacs Street. The existing sewers in Redondo Circle and Kovacs Street will have to be extended into the site under any of the four land use alternatives. Construction of a ten inch sewer adjacent to the Pacific Electric right-of-way north of Talbert Avenue may also be required in conjunction with required drainage improvements. (See discussion on Storm Drains.) 19. b. Water 1 Existing water mains in the vicinity of the study area include a 12 inch main along the western boundary of the site, a 12 inch main in Talbert Avenue and an eight inch main in Redondo Circle. Extension of the 12 inch main in Redondo Circle will be required to serve the study area under any of the four land use alternatives. C. Storm Drains The area of concern is currently served by a 38-40 inch storm drain in Talbert Avenue which terminates at the Pacific Electric right-of-way. Plans call for the connection of this storm drain to a proposed 48 inch pipe extending approximately 1,300 feet north of Talbert Avenue parallel to the Pacific Electric right-of-way. Flooding of property north of Talbert, west of the right-of-way occurs during heavy rains and is expected to continue until the proposed 48 inch storm drain is constructed. Development of the area of concern under any of the four land use alternatives will increase the flooding of properties northwest of Talbert. Construction of the 48 inch pipe may be required prior to development in order to mitigate this adverse impact. It should be noted that the City has not yet acquired the entire length of the required easement for the proposed storm drain. d. Parks The area of concern is immediately north of Terry Park, a five-acre neighborhood park. Huntington Central Park is approximately one half mile to the west. These two facilities will provide convenient park facilities for any residential development on the study area. The 1977 Parks Analysis indicates a deficiency of .44 acres of park space in the general vicinity of the study site at ultimate development. This analysis, however, did not count any portion of Central Park as serving the recreation needs of this area. The land uses under consideration will create the demand for additional park space as follows: Alternative Land Use Additional Park Need 1) Industrial None 2) Medium Density Residential .1.6 acres 3) High Density Residential 2.8 acres 4) High Density Residential/ Industrial 1.4 acres This park need can most likely be met by Huntington Central Park. 20. e. Police and Fire Protection Police service for the area of concern is provided by the City of Huntington Beach, which operates from one central facility located at Main Street and .Yorktown Avenue. Utilizing the national average of 2.0 officers per 1000 population, the alternatives for this area would require the following additional officers: Land Use Additional Alternative Officer 1) Industrial 0 - 1 officer 2) Medium Density Residential 1 officer 3) High Density Residential 1 - 2 officers 4) High Density and Industrial 1 officer SOURCE: Huntington Beach Police Department, 1981 Fire protection for the area of concern is provided by the Gothard Station located on Ellis Avenue on the west side of Gothard Street. The area of concern lies within the five minute response area of the station. Alternative one, Industrial, will create a significant increase in fire prevention loading and a slight increase in service calls. The residential alternatives, two and three, will slightly increase service calls but not significantly. The industrial portion of alternative four will slightly increase fire prevention loading. f. Schools The area of concern is served by Crest View Elementary School and Oceanview High School. Neither an industrial designation nor the proposed Senior Citizens Center will generate any school age children. High density residential developments, in general, generate very few school age children per acre due to the small size of the units that are built. Of the alternatives under consideration, only a medium density residential development is expected to generate school age children as follows:. four elementary school students and two high school students. Crest View School is currently operating at capacity, but the Oceanview School District indicates that due to declining enrollments, it will have no problem accommodating a few additional students. Oceanview High School can also accommodate the additional students. g. Gas and Electrical Utilities Natural gas service is provided by the Southern California Gas Company. Extention of existing gas lines in the vicinity of the study area will adequately service development under all three land use alternatives. The Gas Company notes, however, that supply may be affected by the overall availability of natural gas and by State and federal regulatory policies. 21. Electrical service is provided by the Edison Company. Adequate electric power supply can be provided from 12 KV distribution lines in the vicinity of the area of concern. The Edison Company notes that the total electrical system demand is expected to continue to increase annually, and. if plans to proceed with future construction of new generating facilities are delayed, Edison's capability to serve all customer loads during peak demand periods could become marginal by the mid-19801s. h. Solid Waste Disposal The Rainbow Disposal Company provides solid waste collection to the City of Huntington Beach. At this time, no local service constraints are expected under any of the alternative land use designations. 5. Traffic Circulation i Access to the area of concern is via Redondo Circle and Kovacs Street, which take access off of Talbert Avenue between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard. Redondo Circle is precise planned to connect to Kovacs Street to form a half loop south of Talbert Avenue. That portion of the alignment which is on the area of concern is not yet constructed (see Figure 2-7). Talbert Avenue is a primary arterial with a capacity of 30,000 daily trips. Currently daily traffic on this arterial averages 4,500 trips. Beach Boulevard is a major arterial with a design capacity of approximatey 45,000 trips per day. Traffic volumes on Beach Boulevard are currently at this design capacity in the vicinity of the study area. Using factors contained in the February, 1980 Huntington Beach Transportation Demand Model Report and in the Institute of Transportation Engineers 1979 Informational Report, it is estimated that the land use alternatives will generate the following traffic volumes: Land Use Alternative Average Daily Trips Industrial 567 trips Medium Density Residential 950 trips High Density Residential 2052 trips High Density Residential/ Industrial 990 trips In Alternatives two and three, Redondo Circle in its planned alignment will pass through both an industrial and a residential area. Industrial traffic moving through the residential area may create adverse noise and safety impacts. A mitigation measure would be to cul-de-sac Redondo Circle at some point within the study area. In Alternative four, the proposed four-acre high density residential area has no direct access onto Redondo Circle. Traffic generated by the senior citizen housing project is planned to access to the northeast to Talbert Avenue via proposed streets in the adjacent medium density residential area and to the south to Taylor Drive via a 28-foot easement along the western border of Terry Park (see Figure 2.7). 22. The additional traffic generated from any of the four alternatives is'not expected to significantly impact the capacities of either Talbert Avenue or Beach Boulevard. Bus routes in the vicinity of the area of concern are located on Beach Boulevard. Currently, there are no routes operating on Talbert Avenue in the vicinity of the site, however, the Orange County Transit District indicates that a route may be established on Talbert Avenue in the future if the demand increases. 6. Environmental Issues a. Noise The area of concern is exposed to exterior noise levels of Ldn 60 or less. This noise level is within the normally acceptable level for both residential and industrial development. Noise from the site would increase slightly under all four land use alternatives due to increased traffic. An industrial use of the property may impact adjacent properties slightly with noise from manufacturing operations. b. Air Pollution All four land use alternatives would adversely affect air quality within the South Coast region; however, the impact is not expected to be significant. Projected daily emissions from the four alternatives are as follows: Emission Source Tons of Emission/Day 1) Industrial Mobile .08 Stationary Negl• TOTAL .08 2) Medium Density Residential Mobile .19 Stationary . .002 TOTAL .192 3) High Density Residential Mobile .41 Stationary .006 TOTAL .416 4) High Density Residential/Industrial Mobile .18 Stationary .003 TOTAL .183 SOURCE: Huntington Beach Planning Division, 1981 23. 2.2.3 Staff Recommendation There are only two major areas in the City designated for general industrial uses -- the Huntington Industrial Park and the Central (Gothard) Industrial Corridor. The area of concern is located within this latter corridor. The amount of vacant land in the City suitable in terms of location and topography for industrial use is limited and it is important that acreage currently designated for industrial use in the General Plan not be removed from this category unless there are compelling reasons to do so. A redesignation of the entire site to medium or high density residential is not recommended. This would remove 9.6 acres of land from the industrial corridor without furthering General Plan policies to a significant degree. The alternative to redesignate four acres of the site to high density residential leaving the remaining 5.6 acres of industrial, is specifically intended to accommodate the development of low cost housing units for senior citizens. Appropriate sites for this senior citizens project are limited and Housing and Community Development staff has indicated that the area of concern is the first choice location for such a project. Development of a Senior Citizens housing project would be a significant action towards furthering the City's goal of ensuring adequate provision of housing for all economic segments of the community. Staff recommends that four acres of the area of concern be redesignated to high density residential to accommodate the proposed Senior Citizens housing project as shown in Figure 2-7. 2.2.4 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends that 9.6 acres located approximately 600 feet south of Talbert Avenue and 1,500 feet west of Beach Boulevard be retained as industrial, inasmuch as the site is an inappropriate location for senior citizen housing due to adverse environmental impacts (sawdust, noise) from adjacent industrial uses and to a lack of amenities such as shopping and transportation.. However, if the City Council locates senior citizen housing on the site, the Planning Commission recommends access to the northeast with no access of any kind via Redondo Lane, provision of a buffer area consisting of more than open space (i.e., landscaping, walls), preparation of a noise study and an environmental impact report, and no further erosion of the industrial corridor. I i 24. T 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act guidelines, an environmental assessment is required to address short-term and long-term effects, irreversible environmental changes, and growth inducing impacts of the total project or plan. This section analyzes these concerns in context of the recommended land use changes in Section 2.0. 3.2 SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY Amendment 81-3 does not in and of itself create long term impacts. Rather, it makes changes in the general types of land uses that may be allowed on a particular area at the time of development. Amendment 81-3 seeks to identify short-range issues within a context of long-range. goals, . policies, and environmental planning programs. The amendment itself acts as a mitigation measure designed to minimize any adverse effects on long-term productivity resulting from short-term uses. One of the steps required to implement the amendment is an analysis of the zone changes necessary to bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan. The zoning changes that would result would have significant short-term effects, such as creating non-conforming uses, reducing or increasing intensity of development permitted, and providing stimulus for development. 25. 3.2 IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES The Amendment will mitigate most adverse effects. However, irreversible environmental change of a secondary nature can be expected from development under the proposed amendment. Loss of open space will occur as vacant land is converted to other uses. Although the option to recycle the land to open space after development is available, it is probably not economically feasible. Alteration of topography will be an irreversible change. Although mitigating measures can be imposed as part of the development process, the natural topography will experience a negligible degree of modification. Construction materials of mineral origin will also be needed for development to occur, and fossil fuels will.be committed for long periods to satisfy local energy demand. However, such development would be consistent with existing land use designations. 3.3 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS The proposed amendment will also have growth inducing effects within the areas of concern. An additional population of 705 persons could be generated by uses under Land Use Element Amendment 81-3, thereby creating an. increased demand on public services and utilities and incrementally affecting air quality, water quality, traffic, and noise levels. However, the proposed uses in accord with General Plan policies and programs should mitigate many of the adverse effects generated by the expected growth. The demand for water and energy will likely increase as a result of the proposed land uses in this amendment. Conservation measures can be implemented City- and County-wide to reduce these impacts such as: (1) Reduce evaporation from reservoirs by encouraging underground storage or coating water surfaces with evaporation hindering films or substances. (2) Encourage tertiary treatment of and reuse of the return flow of public water supplies wherever such use is acceptable and safe. (3) Waterspread where appropriate to recharge the underground water supply. (4) Meter water and encourage repair of leaky connections to stimulate more economical use. (5) Reduce consumption of toilets and showers by requiring appropriate modifications to these appliances. (6) Prohibit the use of open gas lighting in public or private buildings. (7) Strategically place electric lights to maximize their efficiency. Their size and power consumption should be minimized as much as possible. (8) Discourage electrical heating in public and private structures. Encourage. solar-assisted heating systems. (9) Encourage the use of reflecting and/or insulating glass in structures where windows are not shaded by exterior architectural projections or natural plants. 26. APPENDIX A FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS o LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT 81-3 In cooperation with Ultrasystems, Inc., the computerized fiscal impact methodology was used to analyze the proposed land uses presented in Land Use Element Amendment 81-3. The fiscal impact evaluation encompassed the land use alternatives considered for areas of concern 2.1 and 2.2. Area 2.1 (Ellis Avenue Area) Two land use alternatives were evaluated for the 10.1 acre area located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street: 1) Commercial Recreation - one tennis club, one racquet ball club and one golf ball driving range with a combined building area of 35,160 square feet and an estimated value of $10,183,180. 2) Specialty Commercial - 88,570 square feet of specialty commercial space with an estimated value of $10,262,480. Table 1 indicates that over the ten-year period chosen, the commercial recreation alternative will produce a deficit of $42,900 on a cash flow basis, while the specialty commercial alternative will generate a surplus of $188,400 on a cash flow basis. Area 2.2 (Beach - Talbert Area) Four land use alternatives were evaluated for the 9.6 acre area located west of Beach Boulevard and south of Talbert Avenue: 1) Industrial - 158,420 square feet of light manufacturing space with an estimated value of 7,680,000. 2) . Medium Density Residential - 144 medium density condominiums with an average sale price of $110,000 per unit. 3) High Density Residential - 196 high density condominiums with an average sale price of $100,000 per unit; and 200 high density senior citizen apartment units on tax-exempt City owned land. 4) High Density Residential/Industrial - 200 high density senior citizen apartment units on tax-exempt City owned land; and 92,417 square feet of light manufacturing space with an estimated value of $4,480,000. Table 2 indicates that over the ten-year period chosen, all of the alternatives generate a surplus ranging from $60,700 for the industrial alternative to $500,500 for the high density residential alternative. Cumulative Fiscal Impact of LUE 81-3 In addition to evaluating each area of concern separately, the cumulative fiscal implications of Land Use Element 81-3 should be considered by decision-makers. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, the total fiscal impact of the amendment is optimized if the specialty commercial alternative is selected for Area. 2.1 and if the high density residential alternative is selected for Area 2.2. This scenario would generate a maximum surplus of $688,900 over the next ten years. A-1 The least favorable combination of land uses from a fiscal standpoint occurs if the commercial recreation alternative is selected for Area 2.1 and if the industrial alternative is selected for Area 2.2. However, this scenario still results in a net surplus of $17,800 over the next ten years. The significance of these results is that any combination of land uses selected will generate a positive fiscal impact on the City. TABLE 1 Ten-Year Summary Comparison of the Proposed Alternatives for the Ellis Avenue Area (Area 2.1) Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Cash Flow Basis Commercial Recreation Specialty Commercial Revenue (1) 283.9 753.8 Cost (1) 326.8 565.4 Revenue-Cost (1) -42.9 188.4 Revenue/Cost 0.87 1.33 (1) in $1,000 TABLE 2 Ten-Year Summary Comparison of the Proposed Alternatives for the Beach-Talbert Area (Area 2.2) Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Cash Flow Basis Commercial Recreation Specialty Commercial Revenue (1) 309.7 680.9 Cost `1) 249.0 439.5 Revenue-Cost (1) 60.7 241.4 Revenue/Cost 1.24 1.55 Alt. 4 Alt. 3 High Density Residential/ Cash Flow Basis High Density Residential Industrial Revenue (1) 1,635.5 929.2 Cost (1) 1,135.0 666.9 Revenue-Cost (l) 500.5 262.3 Revenue/Cost .1.44 1.39 (1) in $1,000 A-2 APPENDIX B: E. I .R. Comments and Responses ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT November 2, 1981 I K "C i �;, 4 {r DEPT. Mr. James Barnes NOV 3 .1981 Associate Planner P. Q. Box 190 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 HuWhgon Beach, u '--A48 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 } Dear Mr. Barnes: SUBJECT: DEIR FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 81-3 Thank you for forwarding us a copy of the DEIR for General Plan Amend- ment 81-3 for our review and comment. The DEIR generally lacked discussion concerning current transit service in the proposal areas and impact on transit by the proposed development. We would suggest a section be included that addresses transit on both sites in the EIR. The Goldenwest/Ellis site is currently served by Route 25 which serves the area between Cal-State Fullerton and downtown Huntington Beach. Since the approval of the GPA could yield more than 100,000 square feet of retail, we suggest that a bus stop be located on the nearside of Goldenwest at Ellis. A bus turnout should also be considered if there is inadequate space to safely stop a bus on-street. Provisions should be made to accomodate bus patrons by including adequate sidewalk, bus i benches and bus shelters, and convenient pedestrian access to and from the. bus stop for future tenants and customers. The Talbert site mentioned in the DEIR is a landlocked piece of property on the south side of Talbert, west of Beach Boulevard. There are four alternative land use proposals suggested for this site but the favored alternative seems to be a change to a high density category which could possibly yield up to. 350 dwelling units. We would support this alterna- tive as well. Currently, .there are no routes operating on this segment of Talbert. There is, however, a possibility that a route may be established on Talbert in the future when the demand increases. Since the property is landlocked, on-street transit facilities cannot be required, but there 11222 ACACIA PARKWAY • P.O. BOX3005 • GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 92642 • PHONE(714)971.6200 i B-1 Mr. James Barnes November 2, 1981 Page Two should be discussion as to .how transit accessibility will be provided to Talbert from the proposed development (i.e. sidewalks, pedestrian paths). Thank you, once again, for forwarding a copy of the DEIR. If there are any questions relative to our comments, please contact me or Mike Haack at 971-6405. Sincerely, CA Dick Hsu Environmental Coordinator DH:MHRX B-2 RESPONSE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT i 1. Ellis Area of Concern (2. 1) See comments incorporated into the text in Section 2 . 1 . 2 (5) 2. Beach - Talbert Area of Concern (2 . 2) See comments incorporated into the text in Section 2. 2. 2 (5) . Also, note that specific design features such as sidewalks and pedestrian paths are typically addressed at the project level rather .than at the General Plan level. B-3 �Ij CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION NUNTINGTON REACH To Jim Barnes From Don Noble Associate Planner Engineer Planner Subject ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Date November 16, 1981 REPORT 81-6 The Public Works Department has the following comments and concerns regarding the Environmental Impact Report 81-6. Traffic Circulation Area of Concern 2.2 Over the years, the property north of Taylor and south of Talbert has undergone considerable study resulting in zoning changes from residential to industrial. We are now looking at the feasibility of changing the General Plan Land Use designation for a portion of the Talbert/Beach study area to either industrial, residential or a combination of both. The current circulation patterns for the area have been based on the land uses established. Currently, the residential and industrial uses have been separated. Residential properties north of Taylor take access off of Taylor and the industrial properties take access off of Talbert via Redondo Circle and Kovac. From a traffic circulation standpoint, it would have been desirable .to provide an access street connecting Taylor to Talbert through a source of streets to minimize the problem that has been experienced at Taylor and Beach. Because of existing development, this alternative is no longer available. In order to minimize future problems, if the subject site is redesignated as a residential use, it is recommended that all traffic be directed to Talbert via Kovac Circle or through the existing medium density residential property to the east. Although Kovac Circle has some current industrial uses, taking access off the street, the mix should be minor. Upon reviewing the alternatives presented in LUE 81-3, Alternative No. 4 is the least desirable from a traffic and access standpoint. Allowing access to a high density residential project adjacent to the parksite would create potential conflicts between park users and motor vehicles. Whether access is taken through the park or through the medium density residential to the east of the subject site, the length of the street could present a problem. The other alternative of allowing the proposed high density to take access through the medium density residential property to the east could also present problems due to differences in residential uses. . ',NNIN14 OEPT. N O V 1981 'P. O. Box 190 Hung`-Won Beach, C.% :12A8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT -2- November 16, 1981 REPORT 81-6 Mitigating measures, as listed below, should be considered for Alternative. No. 4 with access taken to Taylor across Terry Park. Expediting the traffic signal at Beach and Taylor should be considered along with some improvement at Terry Park to minimize the conflict with vehicles. Alternative #4 - Mitigating Measures 1. Attempt to take access easterly through existing medium density residential prop. 2. Provide buffer between industrial and high density residential. 3. Buffer between prop. access to Taylor and park (i.e. shrubbery or low fencing) . DN:de -y RESPONSE TO HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No response necessary. �. ++ Environmental Board CI I Y Of I IUN 1 IN(., f ON BIAC{ I 1111.II.(,10%1 HIM H Po"I Oflicr! lx)x 190 13(!i1d), CZ1lifniiii,1 9',TVl%i November 12, 1981 ' TO: James Barnes FROM:. Environmental Board SUBJECT: GPA 81-3 EIR 81-6 Northwest Corner of Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue The Environmental Board recommends that as a condition of approval, an archaeologist be required to .be present on site during grading operations. This site, although not specifically identified in the existing archaeological map, is within a sensitive band of blufftop sites identified in an updated map done by the Environmental Board in 1979, adjoining the extremely valuable and unique Bolsa Chica Cogstone site. Also, a prehistoric mammoth tusk was .recently re- covered on the northeast corner of Goldenwest and Ellis (adjacent to this site) according to the Orange County Natural History Foundation. This northeast corner site was also not identified on City maps but again lies within the sensitive . blufftop band of sites where Indians and animals gathered in past ages. We feel there is enough past and existing evidence of significant archaeological remains in this area to warrant an archaeologist ' s presence on site during grading with the authority to stop grading operations if artifacts are unearthed. Irwin Haydock C;, ,'R 7 RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No response necessary. ��ayJ �r IN THE +V e JW Superior Court OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA \ 1 u In and for the County of Orange VJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAM CITY CIFRK PROOF OF PUBLICATION HEARING 81-3 81-6 a, State of California ��tlB� i��lpiti 1, County of Orange }ss. 3� g IS IBAe�+i4 HuptLKton y,gfflm at tbr'iio�e rt,7�0rlMt as lode' Mosq,**2Ht if VOW"*�,`lee ihrLAM to aE Rit aJ. Richter �MOMMO or the (sim.IL c °�° That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of TMI • •a6 BF :ipro4 8p�a'tc the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I ,. am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; Rodepitefe9daatas�d 1ffi9Dbd` dilrikU that I am the principal clerk of the printer of they f ltoaa Imo► y ,�. �,�. �s. > Gen�e11I P'l.o ir�w!r Elimi.d�� �+ Huntington Beach Ind. Review a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of 9Mte�wt� are.lsdted to OMW old � foe o:igaust Gwsa1P'�a.l�"l�s$N�meat� �( Huntington Beach i iaforMW"meWoMineihomtie ` of County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the � Dil► 3119F11. disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had * P�1170,1981 and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, �i n�"IEles In&RAV•MOM d and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement thereof,on the following dates,to wit: December 10, 1981 I certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the forego- ing is true and correct. Dated at....................�arden Grove ......................... Califo%ia- . OthdayofDec• 1 1981..... . i -V••I.Y:. .j.✓.. ..��'..... / Signature I Form No.CAF-81380 REQUES*OR CITY COUNCILCTION Date December 21, 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson., City Administrator Prepared by: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services „ Subject: LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-3 j Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 constitutes the third amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan for 1981 . The amend- ment includes one City-initiated proposal and one request by a private applicant for changes in General Plan land use designations. The Planning. Commission approved the request on the first area of concern (2. 1). with conditions and denied the request on the second area of concern (2. 2) . Both request .areas are being forwarded to the City Council along with the Planning Commission' s recommenda- tions as part of Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission approved certification of the portion of Environmental Impact Report No. 81-6 that addresses Area 2. 1 of \ Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 by the following vote: �) ON MOTION BY KENEFICK, SECOND BY MAHAFFEY: AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None The Planning Commission denied certification of the portion of Environmental Impact Report No. 81-6 . that addresses Area 2. 2 of Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 due to concerns regarding circulation, air pollution and noise impacts by the following vote: I ON_.MOTION BY KENEFICK, SECOND BY MAHAFFEY: AYES' Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES-.*... None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None V_ I PIO 4/81 Page 2 The Planning Commission took separate straw votes on the two amend- ment request items. These votes are included in the attached draft minutes from the Planning Commission' s November 17.,,publ c. hearing. The Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 1279 recommending City Council adoption of Land Use Element-Ar-endment`-DTo. 81-3 by the following vote: ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY KENEFICK: 'AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ..ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 5059 1. Approve that portion of Environmental Impact Report No. 81-6 that addresses Area of Concern 2.1. 2. Approve the recommendations of the Planning. Commissiori and adopt by resolution Land Use Element Amendment No, 81-3. . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. .5060 The Department of Development Services staff recommends that the Environmental Impact Report No. 81-6 be certified as adequate for both Area 2. 1 and .Area 2. 2 . The environmental analysis for both areas is incorporated into the. text of the Land Use Element Amendment report (_Sections 2 .1 . 2, . 2 . 2 , 2, and 3 .1): which serves as Environmental Impact Report No. 81-6 . In this report, the issues of noise, air pollution, and circulation impacts are adequately discussed at the General Plan level for both areas of concern. Certification of this Environmental. Impact Report does not pre- clude the ability of the City to require a more detailed environ- mental analysis at the project level . The Department of Development Services staff recommendations regarding the Ateas of Concern are shown in Attachment 1, Summary of Requests. ANALYSIS: The amendment requests addressed in Land Use Element Amendment No. 8173. are summarized in Attachment 1. The requests are analyzed in detail in the amendment report forwarded with this request for Council Action. Draft minutes from the Planning Commission' s public hearing on Land Use Flement Amendment No. 81-3 are contained in Attachment 4 . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Environmental documentation for the amendment requests may be, found in the amendment report which also serves as Environmental Impact Report No. 81-6 . EIR 81-6 was posted for a 45-day re- LUEA 81-3 Dec. 21, 1981 Page 3 view period ending. November 14, 1981. Public comments and staff responses constitute. the Final EIR and are incorporated in the appendix of the report. ALTERNATIVES• The City Council may adopt the requested changes as recommended, modify them as desired, or retain the existing designations in the Land Use Element. I ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary of Requests Chart 2.. Land- Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 3 . Planning Commission Resolution No. 1279 4. Draft Minutes from public hearing before the Planning Commission on Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 5. Resolution for City Council adoption (No. 5059 , Planning Commis- sion Recommendation ') 6 . Resolution for City Council adoption (No. 5060, Staff Recommenda- tion ) JWP:CI: jlm SUMMARY OF REQUESTS ATTACHMENT 1 ENVIRON- REQUEST ITEM/ MENTAL STAFF PLANNING AREA OF INFORMA- RECOMMEN- COMMISSION CONCERN LOCATION ACREAGE APPLICANT REQUEST TION DATION RECOMMENDATION 2.1 Northwest cor- 10.1 A. C. Marion Open Space to EIR 81-6 Open Space to Open Space to Gen- ner of Golden- General Com- General Commer- eral Com-nercial; west St. & mercial cial; direct Attach a "Q" prefix Ellis Ave. staff to. prepare to any implementing a Specific Plan zoning to achieve to achieve a vi- visual appearance seal appearance compatible with a - and a mix of .uses jacent open space compatible with uses and/or to adjacent open limit uses. space uses. 2.2 1,500 feet 9.6 City Industrial to EIR 81-6 Industrial to Retain existing west.of Beach High Density High Density Industrial Designa- Blvd., 600 ft. Residential & Residential & tion; if redesig- south of Industrial industrial nated, take access Talbert Ave. to the northeast with no access on- to Redondo Lane, incorporate buffer area, conduct noift study, conduct E and prevent further erosion of the in- dustrial corridor. RESOLUTION NO. 1279 Q A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN NO. 81-3. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Hunt- ington Beach, California, desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives; and WHEREAS, amendments to the Land Use Element .are nec- essary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends the follow- ing amendment to the Land Use Element: 1.. , That 10 . 1 acres located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street be redesignated from Open Space. to General Commercial and that im- plementing zoning for the area be qualified with a "Q" prefix in order to achieve a visual appearance compatible with adjacent open space uses and/or to limit uses . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends denial of Area 2. 2 and recommends: 1. That 9 . 6 acres located approximately. 600 . feet south of Talbert Avenue and 1, 500 feet west of Beach Boulevard be retained as industrial, inasmuch as the site is an inappropriate location for senior citizen housing due to adverse environmental impacts (saw- dust, noise) from adjacent industrial uses and to a lack of amenities such as shopping and transportation. However, if the City Council locates senior citizen housing on the site, the Planning Commission recom- mends access to the northeast with no access of any kind via Redondo Lane, provision of a buffer area consisting of more than open space (i.e. , landscap- ing, walls) , preparation of .a noise study and an environmental impact report, and no further erosion of the industrial corridor. .WHEREAS, a public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amendment to the General .Plan No. 81-3 was held by the City ' s Planning Commission on November 17, 1981, in accordance with pro- visions of the State Government Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commis- sion of the City of Huntington Beach, California, hereby approves said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. GPA 81-3 • November 17, 1981 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach is recommended for adoption by the City Council of the City of . Huntington Beach, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 17th day of November, 1981, by the following roll call vote; AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN:. None ATTEST: ?a4mes W. PlaliW, Secretary Grace H. Winchell Chairman Q Ask H.B. Planning Co m gallon • November 17, 1981 Page 2 ONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN NO. 81-16 A cant: Department of Public Works A portion an existing earthen C5-SC2 flood control annel is proposed to ed with concrete of approximately 1 0 feet. The project is 1 ted at Edinger and extends hward to Center Drive. ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AN ECOND B NEFICK CGP NO. 81-16 WAS FOUND TO BE IN CONFORMANCE, B OLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Winche Schumac NOES: Mahaffey ABSENT: Bannister aone, Porter ABSTAIN: None REGULAR AGPNDA ITEMS: LANZ USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-3 (Areas 2. 1 and 2. 2) .EIR 81-6 A public hearing for Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 which in- cludes proposals for" changes in General Plan Land Use designations in two areas. Also transmitted are comments received on EIR No. 81-6 and text changes that will be incorporated into the report prior to its being forwarded to City Council. 2. 1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION Carol Inge distributed a letter to the Commissioners from the Environmental Board which addresses this area of concern. The letter stated that the area in question is a - sensitive band that has been identified as a site of. significant archaeological re- . mains from centuries past., and requests that an archaeologist be present on site during grading operations. The ' area is located _ on -the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street, ap- proximately 10 acres in size, and owned by A. .C. Marion. The re- quest is to change the land use designation from Open Space to General Commercial. The public hearing on Area 2. 1 was opened, and closed when no one was present to address the matter. The Commission discussed the proposal. ON MOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY MAHAFFEY THE COMMISSION RE- COMMENDED THAT AREA 2. 1 OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT BE ,ADOPTED, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher,. Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None -2- 11-17-81 - P.C. •1' H.B. Planning Comm ion November . 17 1981 Page 3 A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER_ AND SECONDED BY KENEFICK TO COM- MUNICATE TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THE COMMISSION FAVORS A "Q" PREFIX AT WHICH TIME ZONING IS IMPLEMENTED TO ACHIEVE A VISUAL APPEARANCE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT OPEN SPACE USES OR A LIMITATION ONUSES, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher., Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: _ None 2.2 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL This is a request by City staff to redesignate 9.6 acres of land located approximately 1, 500 feet west of Beach Boulevard, 600 feet south of Talbert Avenue,.. from Industrial to High Density Resi- dential and Industrial. The public hearing was opened. The following persons spoke in opposition to the proposal: . Tom Smith John Silver Mr. LaSares Paul Weatherly The public. hearing wa osed. discu ed the �testiony that was given. Considerable discussion took place regag ' t e ramificatio placing senior citizens :next to an industrial area, specifically a lumber yard, where noise impacts and sawdust would be a health hazard. Also discussed was access onto Redondo Lane. A MOTION WAS MADE BY KENEFICK AND SECONDED BY SCHUMACHER TO RE- COMMEND THAT AREA 2. 2 BE RETAINED WITH INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION AND FURTHER SUGGEST THAT AREA 2. 2 IS AN INAPPROPRIATE SITE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: THERE ARE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS SUCH AS SAWDUST IN THE AIR; NOISE IMPACTS AND LACK OF AMENITIES SUCH AS SHOPPING AND TRANSPORTATION, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: AYES: Kenef ick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None A MOTION WAS MADE BY MAHAFFEY AND SECONDED BY KENEFICK TO RECOM- MEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THE COMMISSION FAVORS THE ACCESS TO THE NORTHEAST WITH NO ACCESS OF ANY KIND ONTO REDONDO LANE; THAT THE BUFFER AREA. BE MORE :THAN SPACE; THAT A NOISE STUDY AND EIR BE CONDUCTED; AND THAT THE CITY GUARANTEE THAT THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER EROSIO14 OF THE INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR, BY THE FOLLOWING STRAW VOTE: -3- 11-17-81 - P.C. H.B. Planning Commision ` November. 17, .1981 Page 4 AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN:. . None A MOTION WAS MADE BY KENEFICK AND SECONDED BY -MAHAFFEY TO .APPROVE . CERTIFICATION OF THE PORTION OF EIR 81-6 THAT ADDRESSES AREA 2. 1 OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-3, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: . Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None A MOTION WAS MADE BY KENEFICK AND SECONDED BY MAHAFFEY TO DENY CERTIFICATION OF THE PORTION OF EIR 81-6 THAT ADDRESSES AREA 2.2 OF THE .LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-3, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER AND SECOND BY KENEFICK LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-3 AS AMENDED BY THE COMMISSION'S PRIOR STRAW VOTES .WAS APPROVED FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE ADOPTION OF AMENDED RESOLUTION NO. 1279, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher, Mahaffey NOES: None ABSENT: Bannister, Paone, Porter ABSTAIN: None . PEN SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-1 In ated by Development Services/Community Services/Community Services The primar mendment request involves enlarging Huntington Ce al Park by approx tely 30 acres. This is a request to cha the ;.,.General Plan designation o 0 acres located south of Huntington ral Park, east -of Goldenwest Str north of Ellis Avenue 630 feet west. .,of Goldenwest Street, from en. space. develo nt to open space recreational - (Area 1) . The se d port ' considers proposed de- letion of two undeveloped park si - eider and Irby Parks (Area 2) . The publichearing was ope pertaining - rea 1 (30 additional acres. added to Huntin Central .Park) . The llowing persons spoke in opposit to the: request: Marvi cklaus D d Dahl Mr. Laster Gary Turlman _ Una Palajac -4- 11-17-81 - P.C. &C,®M M RESOLUTION NO. 5059 —�UoTRD��TeD A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING LAND USE ELEMENT AMEND- MENT NO. 81-3 TO THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives; and A public hearing on adoption of Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 to the General Plan was held by the Planning Commission on November 17, 1981, and approved for recommendation to the City Council; and Thereafter, the City Council, after giving notice as pre- scribed by Government Code section 65355, held at least one pub- lic hearing to consider said Land Use Element No. 81-3; and At said hearing before the City Council all persons desiring to be heard on said amendment were heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, pursuant to provisions of Title 7, Chapter 3, Article 6 of the California Government Code, com- mencing with section 65350 , that Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 to the General Plan consisting of the following change is hereby adopted : That 10. 1 acres located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street be redesignated from Open Space to General Commercial and that implementing zoning for the area be qualified with a "Q" prefix in order to achieve an appearance compatible with adjacent open space uses and/or to limit uses. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1981. ahb '" 4 12/4/81 1. l Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �Z7 City Clerk City Attorney G`,R% , REVIEWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED : City Admnato-� irector of Develo ment Services 2. Publish 12-10-81 NOTICE OF PUBLIC _HEARING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 81-3 AND EIR 81-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in. the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on Monday the '21st day of December 19 81. for the purpose of considering a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan (GPA 81-3) and a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 81-6) including the following items: 2.1 . Redesignate 10.1 acres located at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street from Open Space to General Commercial . 2.2. . Redesignate 9.6 acres located approximately 1500 feet west of Beach Boulevard and 600 feet south of Talbert Avenue from Industrial to a Mix of Industrial and High Density Residential . A legal description is on file in the Development Services Office. Copies of the proposed General Plan Land Use Element Amendment and Environmental Impact Report are available for review in the City Clerk's Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said General Plan Land Use Element Amendment No. 81-3 and EIR 81-6 Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED 12-3-81 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk \J NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM LAND USE EZ&A'1CN7— A446A)1!"Mt'A r ABC). TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: I�rQ/� PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE ` DAY OF ye C 2 m k - 1961. i AP's are attached AP,'s will .follow No AP's i Initiated by: / Planning Commission y Planning Department Petition Appeal Other Etf?- Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO Refer to -- �� � q� Planning Department - Extension # Sa`7 for additional information. * If appeal, please transmit exact wording to be requited in the legal. Publish_ ; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT N0. 81-3 AND EIR 81-6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of . 7:36 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible on money the day of December 19--u for the purpose of considering a proposed-amendment to the Land Use Element of the General. Plan (GPA Bill and a Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR ell including . the following items: 2.�. .. .t...,::_s 4'1 's."h117..a9"+w:;t�1' $Yl+ �,$��t'aRA"�'�'t•r�"v�Y:��'t",,,t sFt=i•", .. 44A -40 2.2. , CI AP (a a ss. Q.oc -5ci t�sao ems' w - teaa% %VI&WOA� OUV Coal SIUV.L...d J_ _ :MY!'Jrib:li:•.t:Masntl rerun A legal description is to. file t�.Md..Otve>I t_ ; ri Ofice. Copies of .the,`proposed-,General Plan Land-Use. Element Amendment and Environmental Impact Report are availaele for review in the City Clerk's Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said General Plan Land Use Element Amendment No 81 EIR 8T�14. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92646 - (714) 536-5227 DATED CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Aiicia".M. Wentworth r .. r- .. .. .. a.. � +8.-. r -i•:i}:•.•Y':AY..r i'.'�.... •t1T^a-.an•n.y.1Y:P'.1•! .r.W-i/...t_ y .. ' ... .. „ ..t. .. iL..... . �.,. •.. "l::.rN• _ .. a .. .,. IIIfIlIfe1 �1� e1 �11I1 III 1 He 1 1111111 1111111 11 1111� IY111111 1111 1 111111IIt11 11111111111 t11, Iwe 111111111�11 lul111111111111111Ell 111��i1 � 1 1 11111 1 1111111111 1�11111111111111111 11111111111111111111111� 11 IR11Bf11111111 1111 IIBe11B111111 111111 r 111 11111111111 1111111111111 1 �111 I Bil e 11111 ° 11 IIIIII111111 W1111111111111 1111 11111 C • 1111�1 �1 1111 111 11 1� 1 II 11 �1 1111A1ii111i IN1�1�11111111 1 111�11 � t Itltlll 1 1 I � � ° 1nn ling rr/IItt11111illlltl�ll�Ill�1 fill If t1�f11 IY11111111111111111111111111111111�111 1111 111 1II ■ IN11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111! � INIt1111111111111111111111111111111 1111 IIIIIIIII tt111111111111111t1t111tt11tlt1t11t1�11t111111111tf: � � eeeleefeefeleeeeeleeefleeefeefefefee IfeeueBefeefi _ 1 � •____sue_-_-s_ a aY.�o�v���rd�sls Illllll�l�dlli�lllll ®_�e�_ INDUSTRIAL Terry Park , ®� � ®®ArAA ■AAA®■AA�AAA■ �A® i is ®®®®�■ t ° i■®■ �■�i I , On ®® i■ '�I®!, ONION 1■ tee■ ■® �® 1■ im 01 ®® ..e®-�.� ■.�A®■� ors �® oil N , oa - - -- - - --- -- - ---- -- --F-- - --- - --- - - - -- ----- - � - -- --- --- - - - - - .. _ .. 159-301-01 i 159-062-•0.7. Lend Use Rlawant 81-3 Thom" 8 i Benign I Lopes 7601 Talbert Avenue -1981 (JH) 7571 Ontario Drive a4aYtin<IL•n 0eh. Calif �' ; Nuntinytion Beach, Calif 6�648 ; 92648: . - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -�- == 159-301-01 i lb9-A02-07 i 159-052-08 - - - - - - - - - S,ilver i..Hiwin Silver "Iml G 649=n ; Margo Marlin_riberylaw W . P.O..-SO S45 7561 Ontario Drive 18-W2,R �c n Circle ' Aoosuesd,. Cali! ' Hmtin i tinybon Beach, Calif 92M i ..91770 Odin Beech, Calif -� - --- ----- -- - - - --- - --- --- -- --- -- - - - - - -- - - -- 159-301-03- -- ------- - - - � 159-062-01 , 159-062-09. N E. Buddy O®best Dale E Fib , i Gl�i�ln W IJIUrkett. -3311 9ounty Circle 18331 Carnaby Lame � 18292 CArnaby Lane H►astiny0on.Beach: Cal , ttintingtio� Deere, Calif 9�bt9 ' 92648 ,- H►attitst�m Beach, Calif �. 92644 . - - - - -.- = - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -�- - = - - - -, - - - - - - - - 15*-30i-04 i 159-062-02 i 159-%2-10 Orly�l Amicoal Instrlment .Doi Fra Ca nk:P yerport Max WnIY�iO 08 ld1 :Re� Circle , 7592 Tiaylb r Drive tau*1ngton Beech, Calif IAmt1r>iyton Baerch, Calif 18282 .C,asnatyy Lane 9Z648. ; 92646 Hun 8 ?. Bea�cfi: Calif ---- - ----- -- -----�-- ---- -- -- -- --- - - -- r- --- - - - 159-302-01 ; 159-m-03 159-052-11 rc YAnmth M Yamashi 'i L Kathryn Pla wtt i Jeioes W Hwtin 10922 Lake '00uart Ad ' 7602. Thyloc Drive 7W Tay16r .30ba Avenue Santa &a Calif, Beech; Calif , 92705 92646itypon Reach. Calif 92646 ----------------------T- --------------- 1---------- - -- - - - - 159-302-02 159-062-04 154-062-12 ja w n,Asaigal ; ! Mark A Sautin. C/o kimm I. .ports � ; . 756Z Taylor Avemn 7552 Talbert Aviiii■iue i i f3wti trap!Beacti4 Call 92648 ; � _ J Calif _ ;. 92648. . - - -1- ---- - --------- -159-3Y2-03 159-062-04 *-- -.----- -.--- ___ -.. . 159-062-13 Silvia i HiWin Silver !Martin J Oedakwk Wavey Levitt c�u i tittle. Calif CO , 7601 Ontario Drive ' 757.Z T4W Avenue 3055`WiLgtLire aivd. 1440 1 Wmtiri3tyon BasCl► Calif Las. Angeles, Calif 90010 92648 9 64t tnn Beach, Calif _.�� -- - -- -1---- --- - - - 159-302--04------- ---- -- 159-062-05 i 159-051-01 Reginald lie La Cueeta ; Irene D Gonzales i ��,ry J StitZin7es 7811 Glencoe Ave #1 � 7s91 Ontario.Drive ' i 8780 Warner Avenue uut,tinl9tu z Beach. Calif Huntkxjton beach. Calif Rbuntain Valley, Calif 92647 - 92648 . 9270+3 - - - -- - - - -- - - - 159-302._06 � 159-062-�6 � 159-O51-Ul Anne It Hiyaan Dow C gyp, , Ronald M Ituss411 P.o. box 545 ; 7581 Ontario Drive ' 7711 Ontario Drive Itsemmad, Chlif i ikmtinyton Beach, Calif ' , Huntington reach.Calif 91770 92648 92648 - - - - - - - - - - -- - - --- - - - -- - - - - --- -- - ------- --- -- - ' ---- - - ---- - - - - - - - - T - i ' t _ 159-051-03 159_04 1 Chsrlsg :S M linan Lind Use MMMt 81-3 Aa34Ph JenrsiChes 7701 Ontario Drive. Ares 2.2 1 7771 Ontario Drive HLMti xPm beach, Calif ' (JU) I . 92648 ' ; �.�Beach, Calif ' 92648 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -!- - - - = - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - = - - - - -. ._ _ .. 159�-051-04 ' -1 - 159-051-12 ' 1WO44--02 Jct1n 8_Mgrttsgn i Joe M- Make i Curt !ftlaE�.rt 7691 Qnti►s'So Drive 7652 Tlmylpc Avenue � 7761 Ontario Drive ti�ntirytion Basch, Calif Ihiptingtion Meech, -Cali! 936e8 Huntington Beach,C+a11f 9. . . . i _i_ 92648 - -15y`-051-05 . -. - - - ---- --- - -,- - ---- - - ---- --- - - -- ----- - - - --- - - - - - - - 3. 10ja * A Weraida Donald L 8nith 159-M-03 7671 Oetarlc Drive i 7662 0.11W oc Avenue 77 'Ontario 11=■■ie Ovdwe Buntit�ybon 80eic1ti Calif duet inytion Bach, :G14 92648 , 92648 t. Arquirl Beech, Calif 92648 1S9-051-06- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;- 159-051-19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; 159-044-04 Vb;" R Sullivan Be11S,e J yaa+ndn , Claim A 7601 Qntaric [give 7672 Taylor Avenue7731 anlario Dtiv+e H Beech-, Calif Bed' H�ntirgtM beach, Calif 92648 92648 92648 -r- = � - -- -------- - - - - •- ------ - -=- -- -- - - --------------- - --- 159-051-07 i 159•-051-15. ZlOMs G I IAV4 ; ,Gaim 15}044--OS 7651 Ontario Drive i �/,6 Villays Y � L i Haul AcY6zman Gary Packs bixg Basch, Calif 18964 Brooch at St not' arerB�' 3 S CT 92648 E1aMatain.Valley, Ca1it 92708 ' . ' - -- -- ---=- - -- ---- - Newport:Beach, Calif_92663 - - - - ---- --- 159-051-08 ; 159-051-16 = Lloyd A Smith � Al i 159-0�4-06 r Av Av avandKn N dory 7631 .GAtario Drive ; 7702 Taylor er ; 1..761 Taylor Avenue tAa&%.UIV aan.Beech,-.Calif Beach.. Calif 92648 y Huntirngt Beach.. Calif 92648 . - - -------- -- -- - =-------- ------------- I------ ------.-- --- �lid-09 159-051-17. 159-044 07 Q�9 Nand T Win P shock et al 554.0 E 6th Street 7712 Taylo , 7762:� r Averan 1?aylgr Awetwe Logy Beech, Calif lton BeadU Call! 90814 92648 H t r�gton Beach' Calt. _- - 159-US1-10- - - - ----- -- - - - - T 159-051-18 - --------- ---- 1 ---:-•-•- - --_ Kenneth T Baldwin , 1159-041-08 7622 Taylor Avenue ; i Ralph H Aiddiny "ItuNt an Beach, Calif , 226td � 7772 Taylor Avenue 92648 ; Huntir gim beach, Calif i 92648 - 159--U51=11 -- - ----- - - - - - 159`-051-18 _ ' - - - .- - - -- - ' 159-043-01 G Ashby 76 yl;cr AAvve m ' 7722 Avenue Taylor ` Philip Metwn huptingtm Beach, (:ali f ' y 7812 Taylor Avenue ' Hunt.in ion beset, Calif �tiriytzxi beach, Calif 92649 92648 92648 -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- - -t - - - - - - - - ----.-- --- -- -- - - -'- --- - - --- -- - - - - - - - -- - A- � � i �I 1 ' 1 - - - -------- - - - - - - ------ - -- --- - -- - - - - --- - - - .. . } 159-w3_02 "1 - _ 159•-052-18 Peter F $ticand ; Lead UW Ghent 81-3. 1 "no"Ages. 2 2 1a261 P Lane i 7712. Ontelrio D-riV8 ,untirqtcn8eec�L Calif I �tiniton Beach, Calif 92648. 91648 . _ i- - 159-063-03 - - - - - - - - - - -- - -i 159-05�10 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - i. . .159-045-01 -. - - - - - - - - Ls6 D YAM LAM had1 Owl $ Hearbciuist 18271 Pe*V Lsns 7622 Ontario Drive 18311 Do'-am rl8 street Mai ' Calm ' ftIA _- Calif , Nuntir>fytloa Beach Calif Bea<34 1 .bunt3�yt� . 92648 , 92648 . 92648 - - --- -- ---- - ---- - ----- -- -- -159-0.4}-04 i 159,-05Z-U - -- 1 159-065-02 Jonah -Pyy8 i Miicael P Mrst Jatuea .Wita*t 1tl291" Pa®y Law 7632 Ontario'Drivee i 18321 Delaware Street ' du pain$m- Beech, (hli! 1 l/uroti�9 ..Beach. a11! ' duntln7torr Bench. Calif 92648 . %248 ; 02648 159-04.3-25 � 159-052-12 � 159-045=03 WIA D F McCafferty T cross H Pad= et Al 1 1*-Ly L Schutt 18312 1 imore Street 1 7652 Ontario Drive ! 18341 Oelaiware Street. beact>4 Calif U. 8rr�l�, taalif i Hun tt jbD h:.Balech, Calif 92648 , 9264.8 ' 92648 - - - ._ .. -- - ---- -- -- - ---- --L -= - -- -- ------------ - - - ----------- -- - - - --- - - 15*-043-26. 159-052-13 1 159-M-23 Jahn'8 Ailandex 1 Gle 'k Q=zVb. jUm L Itidriguez 18302 Oels±are street . 7662 Ontario Drive 1 18342;Manitoba Lat>ie -Cal Hrect>t, Calif ' B010.0 Calif 92648 92648 ; 92640 _'. , _ ..-- ------ - - ---- T----=- ----------------- -- 1 - -- -- - - - - -. 159-043-27 1. 159•-052-14 i 159-045 2! Aal]elnls M Gomee , Claude O Stuart I Aaymand Alen Binger 906 loth Street ► 7672 Ontario Drive ' lei22 Manitoba. Loans N�ntsrti�tioti BGM&4 Calif A Bleach, Cali! 1 I ltitytDll Beech, Califs 92648 - - -------- ---------1_ --------- ------- --t- ------ ---- - -- - 159-043-26 ; 159;-052�15 r 159-04S-25 Horaw. aw PkHaill Sey YAnneth M 11POs_m nallip W Gentry 75 .Z Vantage Drive ; 10092 Theseus Drive 1 18312 Manitaba Iane H►aitirytoct beach "-Calif Beach Cali aunnti >4boa Beech, Calif 91647 926646 . 1 92680 . -- - - -------- ------ - 1- --- -------- - - - -- + 15"52-16 ; 159-061-N. Steil#�en Jer»inys Aobwt J Awash � Riditsrd J.Battaglia 18262 Delaware Street 1 7692 Ontario Drive 16168;beach Blvd. #260 Beach j Calif Huntington Bractz. Cali! i Huntircjton -Beach, Calif 92648 i 92648. 92648 , Sandra L Mille , 159-052-17 159-061-09 Alvin d Danis Dale P. Fim 18479 Santa Carlotta Street ' 7702 Ontario Drive 1 7592 Ontario Drive Fountain Valley, Calif ' 1 f Nuntinytan Hosch, Calif 1 Hun Beech, 92708 ! 92648 1 92648 1 � -• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - - --- - - - - -- - - --- ---- -- - --- - ---- - - - - - '- - 1 1 � 1 � 1 I , 1 � 1 I I ' I � i - - - - -- - - - - - ---- - - -- - 159-061-10 ! 159-141-16 jaw william"k Jr Lend Use Ellemlent 81-3 ; PaNxt J Warmak 7W2 Ontario Drive I Area 2.2 OW . i 841 liow+ell Averwa t mtimjtioln Beach, Calif Loaq Bea►di, .Ceti! 92648 A 90804 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159-061 ll , 159-141-04 , 159-141-27 !F-ft ert C Glatz I W 8 Jo11y Gevzge R_ Knapp 76014ii= Drive 13561 Wick kinsber Avenue ; Agnes Bmwt Huntf;rjton Beach, Calif Mm minsteir, Cbhif I 291 S. Ruclid -Ave Apt 0 -7 9Z648` 92683 Pas a, calif 91101 . - -- - -- - - - - - - --- -- -- -I- - ---- - - - -- - - -- - - --- - - - 159-061-12. ' 159-141-06 ' 159-141-40 Charles L Gages Le ADy B.ODIUM 7.591 Quebec Drive I I Hail 14atirel ibel. wwmaxy . Hunt ni3bon Beech, Calif ' 231y S Gale Drive ' i 1 7807 N 34th:alViacm 92648 _ _ - _ - _Beverly Hills, Calif 90211 PI�X, Arix" 85021 159-291-01 - - - - `. - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - r - -.-= �.. 199441-08_ 159-141-41 Laszlo Kovacs Citadel -Service 0orR A E Arnold 4645 E- Pacific Coast k4 h+e►y i 600 N Brand Blvd, .. I P.O.' Boot 370 IQMq Beech, Calif i G andaXelp .Oil' ' Calif - -9 -.----=- - - --- - - - i _ 91203_ i . . - T ----------- ----- -- 1 --- ---- - 159-291-02 " ' 159-141--13 ' 159.141-4.5 city- dt Heath ; Rnr m. D Jb eis 1 Mimplovjc P. Aretds Citadel Seivioe C7oitp ' 7ti62 Talbert Avenue 600 N. Brand Blvd I untington. Beach .Calif Glendale, Cslif 91203 ' 92G4Y - - - - - - -- -- - -- -- --�- --- - -- - -- ----- ' 159-291-03 - 159-141-16" ' 159-141-47 Paul thetly ! Quarles Hammu sers ' Holm Kincaid 16Z2 Zblbert.Av+es�ue ; 4952 whryaslr:Jlnenue btiuitie 318 � Rt..2 90Z 255' Htjhtuvgt n Beach-# .(:alif I Huotingtoa Bikk Calif ' Deni8lon� T+exaa 92648_" 92649:.. ; 75020 ----- -- - ----------i----.-=--- -------=-=-----'--- -'--- 159-141-01 ' 159-141-17 ' - - - -- - - - - - J Paul E11iDt Jbhn F.Chilt� 159-141-48 1232 Dail Drive ► 670 .VI 2ml lmo Drive 'ls'°°° M P cGbwe�n ' 3051_C&Cab Street Montmmey Pack, Calif ; c;lawooat. dlaf t 91754 i 91711 026W - - - - - - - --------- - -- J----= - - 159-1�1-02 i 159-141-18- 159-141-5Z -- -- - -jo Scott 1 W EE Jolly. -itaddel Seavioe oxp i 6A�rM ll xk7m Drive 13561 beach Blvd 600 N Brand Blvd ' Mgitinyt Beach, Calif Westminster, Calif 92603 Glec�dale, Calif 91M3 i 92647 --i- - - - -- - - - - - - 159-141-03 - - - - - - - - 159-141-20 1 159-141-53 Charles V Lindsay Jr 1 Florence M Llnthi, = 1 Kaiser Pburidatim Health i 304 IA Veta citadel Service Cwp. ; Plan Inc I t", Cali 1 600 N RrmxL Blvd 1515 N Verm * Ave Rn 523 92024 Glendale, Calif 91203 Los An6pelas, Calif 90027 - - - - -.- - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -j- - - - - --- ---- -- - -- ---- L------- - - 1 1 ti _ I I I � 1 — — ——— — — - — ——— — ——r — — —— — ——— ———— — - — ——— — — ——— —— — — — — - — — — — — -- 159-271-01 I 159-271-18 Loula J l eoitt i lAnd Use 814went 81-3 j g 7836 0?%pie 'Drive Area 2:_2 tom. i 7845 toad Drive Beech." Calif , Beach, Calif 91648 I i 92648 —. -. — — — - — — — - —- — — — — —1— — — — — — — — — - — — — — - — — — — — — — — i 159-271-02 1159M1-09 i 1W271-lft ram0 t ; Itilio.A MuKuri 1 Owaer•NIM 18176 Sliason Lime ; 7041 bari Drive , . ti�tibon belch, C&li.f I �r>!t� Bsa6h. Calif 92648 -� - -- ---- - ---- - ------ - -- - -, -- -= ---------------- --- � =- - ---- - - - -- - - 159-Z°1i-02 ; 159•-271-10 i. 159-271-20. Been J Ms rains Dww L CasbalI ', Oerald B Qedxne 7842 -Oimis Drive `181.72 Oho= Laos 1. Slll Stallion Cinch lfl=rtit�gbon Beach,Calif euntington Osl it i Ht=it itfyfion A�seec4l, 'Call 92648 i '92648 i 92640 — — - - — - — — —- -— — — - — — —— — — — —1— —.— — = —- — - - - — — — — — — — — — — — — —I— — — — — — — — — — —— — — — 159-271-03 159-271-11 08odc J,Aosalee , James:L Jtefson RLta�a;l G.Thompson 7846,Oomie. Drive 18162 Shirm Law i 7831 Loci Drive Nuntirigt�can Busch,' Cal f I Hcstitirrtion B .'!i, alit i Huentir>r2bcin eeeifi, Calif 92648 � 92648 _92648 -- ---- --------- - ---- --_-- -------- ---- --------LI ---=----- -- - - - - - - 159-271-04 , LW271-13 159-271-22 R*Gct L StaUrecht I H&A G Bogptt& , itarl,`Ssit= Js P..O.,Hck 1507 '18146 Win:LAM ,, i 7825 Load• Drive !Myrrh Heach: Calif I .&VItirsom Mach r d 't;., Beach, Calif � - 92647 92648 I 92648 I - .--=-=--- ---- ----- - -- L -.- ------------ ---- - ---- r-- ----- - - - - .---- 159-271-05 1 159-271-14 1S9•-271-23 VWM I Ass Park , Hste-fib 1re8 I lasy 18212 Shoran Lune I 7865 Lori Driver I A I , I T821 •.Load Drive Beach Calif - i ibca<it3siy _. 92 - --------- i -92648 -- HrtaCh Cal1t ------ i 99 esecfi_ C�.1f_ ! - ----- --- - -- ----- ------------- 159.271-06 i 159-271-15 i . 1S9-271-24 Lasiy B.go'lbo itanity J 'Tay i Ts4nacm T Hsu 1820.2 &=,ion tam I 7861 Loa:i Drive! � 7eIt1S:Lori Circle Aintin;�ton Beach, Calif i Antitgbon awche alit E�tstgbce . 92648` eeerh, Calif 92648 L 02"S 77 -- - - 159-211-07 159-271-16 Jots L eattx�lc ' thioass E 159-271-25 ; Da esla f:udskis 16196. Sharon Lane i 7855 Loci Drive i 7154. 170th StreetBeach, Calif i eeeCh, Cali t I riwaxim, NY 92648 192648 I 11365 — 159-271-08 i 159-271-17 ¢-271-26. Nelson J ChwV Alan A Obllier Aobatt L TA) 18186 Sharon Lam , 7851 uwi Drives ; 7.805 tail Derive: Aintlnydon Boixt, Calif 1 Huntington Basch, Oil' i d Beach Calif 9264tl. 92648 ' 92648 - -_- - -- - -•-- - -- - - - - - -- - - - - ------ ------- --.- - - ----- ------------ -'-- -- - I 1 1 1 e � I I I • � 1 I � 1 I -- - - - - - - -- - L - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - - ----T- - - --- -- -- -.- -- - - -- -- _- . W271-27 i 159-271-50 Carolina SbracAme Lard use. RION It 81-3 Jeffrey J Johnson Ml Load Drive ' 1lrtect .2.2 47H) I 19156 Alice Lane 9Wn h. Calii H►aYtisybo� 8�sa�c�, Calif - - - � - -92648 - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159-271-29 ; 159-271-39 ' 159-271-51, Natalie 14 Hearn iJbng Hq Won i D1nD Rartsgt�alds 18145 Alice Law ; 7802 Cftw" Drive 6. Drakes 9ey Drive Hr`uti:ytion beach, Calif I "*AI boq Beech, Calif ; Comm Dal.Mar, .Calif 92648 926 8 i 92625 _ - - - --- - - - - ------ - --- -- - - - --- -I- -- -- - --- - - -. I 159=271-30 ; 159=271-40 i 159-271-52 xuen am Lee ►att A Femaley ! =7 'c 18155Alio ane 7806 CbnniDrive i 7 Drive 16an lnjtm Bich, Calif ' Huntingt n 96�ch, Cal Hmtir+gtan Beech, Calif 9164{l I 92648 92648 - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - -.►- - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159-371-31 ; 159-271-41 ; 159-271--53 R*ert H Flaner ! Aobert lk7Clsln i DiAm M miles 310 C lormair i4n ky 8412 m..b all Drive 7832 Dori'Drive Seal Basch, Calif Beech, Calif ; Nuntirx2Ccan Beech, Calif bDtisorl 90740 ; 92646 I 92648 - - -- ---- - ---- - - ---- -------- ---------- --- -- - �---- --- - 159-271-32 ' 159-271-42 I 159-271-54 Fred M G rumwbe un Lela Spencer Solon'H Young 1817l`Ai ce Lane I 7816 Connie Drive I lox Lori.Drive E1umtingtm beach, Calif EuntingMm Bosch Calif ' Mx*liigtm Beach, Calif 920la i 92648 ; 92648 --- - ---- - ----- ----=- = --- -- - --- --- - -- -- - -- ---- - --- - - -- - - 159-271-34 i 159-271-43 ; L"-271-55 Alan:Dolllar. ' Dewid E Anuatta, i Antk=4 Avila 3rd _ ' 7842 Lori Drive ; 18201 1�liie Lane ; 7822 Oohs.Ddre Hfitin ion Beach, Calif Huntinyt on Beach, Cali! i Mkitxftzon beach. Caslit 92648. ; 92648 I 92648 -- -=------- -------- -- ---- -- ---------.- -- ------- -_-- - -- - - - - -- 159-271-35 ; 159•-271-N I 15.9-2.71-56 Jan Ttm dLrus Ten Berge I Finds A am'num ; Richard A .]ta-chlen 18205 Alice' Lane ' 7811 Connie Drive i 7846 Loori Drive' H>untinybon Beach, Calif H�urEit�gtM Beech, Calif ' t6 *itgton Beach, Cali 92 .,W _ ` I 92648 92648 - -- - = - - - - - - - - ---==.--- ------- -1----- ----- ------ -- - 159=271-36 . i 159-271-48 j lW271-67 N04 Son Hsu ' Flavin, Garcia Jr I Maui E Benward 18215 Alice Leuae i 18172 Alice Lane ' 1817S Shumn Lane Huntizxjtion Beach, Calif - i Hunt,itgbon 8esdy Cali! I�tnttnytian Hescfi, Calif 9264ti .92648 i 92648 ' - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ . _ ; 159-271-38 ; 159-271-49 159-271-58 Tlxm" W flare I Alonzo W Plii].lipe Barbara J Eyster 7796 Cmde Drive ' 18162 Alice hates i 16185 Sharm lAne Hunt nytx n Beach, Calif Mintington Basch. Calif ' Hmtinc7oon Beach, calif 92648 ' 92648 i 92648 - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- --- - - - ---- - -- - - ------ - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - ' I 1 � I 1 I 1 1 ' I ' I I _ - - -- - - -r` - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -- -- - i - -- - - - - - - - - _- 159-271-59 f 165-251-42 KidIftbi_D Land User Fleowit 81-3 ' Frantlin J lhxxiella Airs 2.2 GN 1 IU91 Shumn Lane ; 3541 *xatside Circle I . Beach Calif , Beach, Calif 9Z648 I ! 92649 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - --.- - -. - - f 159-271-W 1 .165--261-26 A165-251-18 f A Sue Whitaker ' hiJan Koddan. 18201 Sharm Lane , . - I 11920_ Ingler+�o�d lwietue M kinom Beech, Calif i Hewtb=rse, Calif 92648, �saorbt�ii i 56150 - -- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - --- -- -- - - - - I- - -- ----.- - - - - - 159-271-61 i 165-26.1-26 165-161-01 ' David .Ling Theodwe:Nw*h i I Dorris L Krutcik 18205 Shutn Lane 1 Mamma, Br mn VerAws ; 75210 .Vahene A Wry Wnt�ncjt Beach,. Calif ! 74565 DilLo_n Ad, i Palm Desert. Calif 92644 - - - - - - - - - - ► DesertHot Sp�1nq_s, - - - - - - - -+ 92260_ 159-271-62 - - - - - - I _ .. . California, 92240 1165-.181-02. Uuntington Village Estates ' 1 I ------ --: ( Junes A Stx�n4 11maeawr" Aspocaation. 1 1 3800 E. lst Street c% HUntinybgsl Beach Business �i l�eacli,."Calif I . ---1-_..- - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - I 90803_ ---- ---- - - -- 17171 Beach 81vd 165-261-27 ;.165-181-03 E> tinjta ` beach, Calif Z m&we [4anthei I Gat"t I Patel 92647. I 74565 DilliOri' 27352:Ventosa AV+ecilae -'- I Desert riot Springs, Cal_ if Mission Viejo, :Calif 92240. _ 22691 - - - - -. 159-271-66 ; 165i-261-31 1 165r481-04 2lOoa W King I manthai Cha='ita3bls Trust. ; Thuy Duc Luu 7041 t Beach, Y MentAo bsoiln Vectt�utie 15582 Serene Drive 7445 Di"I'an ad- ; liuntir>tgtori` Beech f Desert Hot e. p.slcs, - - - -_ _ -- _- -- - _------ ---_ _ - - y -- _ __ ____r - 159-261-23 I California, 92240 ; 16 5-181-14 Heiman L Kennedy 1 Thomas 6 A Hammond ' 1 ; 14i91 Janice 'Street 74$65 Dillon rid " ' Westminster, Calif Desert Hot .Splrinq*, Calif I _ _ :_9 26 6 3: -_-- -I -- -_ -_ - _ - 159--261-24 1165-261-32 16 5-l d 1-15 Archie V Palmer 1 May. L Lswie 1 William R Shinen c/o Palmer Iatj t Motulrs ; "wdore, Mart kai 114102 Montgomery Drive 3300 Atlantic Avenue 174565 Dillm Ad 'Wes tminister, Calif YixN Beach, calif 90.807 Desert Hat Springs, Calif 192683 - - - • - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 7 - - - 159-261-25 1 165-253-06 i 16 5-181-1 b Archie V Palmer ; Hun' tiiy� Nwth 'Gordon R Surrah et a1 3300 Atlantic Avwiue 1 c/o Business Parks Inc ; 215' Old Ranch Rd . I"W Beach, Calif ; 300 N Clara Street i Seel Beach, Calif 90807 Santa am, Calif 92703 1190740 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- -------- -- - - - i----- - - --- - - - - - 1 1 � � 1 . , 1 • I 1 - ' - -- - 165-181-17 I ' haul W Schultz i Land Use Element 81-3 6862 Loyola Drive I Area 2.2 (JU) tauntinyton beach, Calif 9`647 ' I - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- i65-181-18 - - - -'- - - - - c;eorye Roudanez 1401 Cliff Drive I Newport Beacu, Calif ' 92663. I - ----- ------ ---- -- ----- ----- ------ - - - - --- -- --- -- I. 1 , � I j , I f � I i - - - - I 1 , I - -------- - ----- ------- -I---- --- - -- - - - - -- -- ----- I. , I i j I , I I ' - - - - - - - -- - - --- --�--- - ----- -- ----------- -- - ---- --- - - - _ ' I I I j . I , I I III ------ - --- - - - -----fij ' -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - -- ' - - -- ----- -- -- ---- ---- -- ---------- --- -- --- - - -- - - ------ - - -- - - - --- ; I -;- I , I , I I . 1 I - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- +- - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - I I I I CF- R (HUNTIN-3TON CE N i Rrt. PARK) C _ R Cn (HUNTiNG CE M..PARK . 3 .. W ' ON SPA E f}•.}t••: S •V.r{:•::�:}i:•rr� LLL :5L•ti1}•• ...L• :>} ESTATE RESI ENTIAL Z UN/GA ESTATE RESIDENTIAL R UN/GAC Area of Concern 2. 1 o" 0 6. Figure 2-3 - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- --- -- --- -- - -- - -- -- - - -- ----- - - - --- - - - - 110-182-01 ciYx-6-t Wantinjton �iadh- farb* Ms+e-RI ant-8-1-3- - - - - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i Area 2.1 WH) 110-164-13 Richard V Wine 2200 FW& Nerporict 8401 ' Nowport Beach, Calif 110-18 2-0 2 i ' 92660. � r LV �ya_.Ce�1tA�- - - --- - - --- --- = ----- --- ---------- -- -- --- --- --- -- -- -- 3 2 3 Via Lido Soud ; 110-182-12 i I10-184-16 Wew rt beach, Calif � Emily V.iii. C1,appar Will iam B B�.artachard 92664 421 N Janos Ststiaat Serlona, Ariiona Anatudm, Calif ; 86336 110" 182-03: ' 92805 . i. Avery C E4tOr1- - - - - - - - - - - - = - -_ - - - - - - - - - +- - - - -.- - - - ' - - - - - - 17524 Santa Paula Circle 110-184-01 T - - - . -:- F`ountain Valley, Calif ! X I 110-1S4-17.. adley _ Dsvidsc�ri Charles F Barrett y 17 U d 24281 Hillvirar Derive ; Betty Mopuill+an. I ; lsqu Niguel. Calif 2630 *a�: Blvd. l 1 U-1 rd 2-"0 5 92677 Los Aiyeles, Calif 90M ir,8 � 3(sb1�- -- ' - - ------- Rip ina C Goes: -- --- ------------+-==-=------ ----"---- --- - - --- - � - ua-is�-o3 - � iio-iea--ie 1300 Adams. Ave. Apt. 2dP kilton,.t! !a" i4yrOn M Weiaavn custa Melia, Calif y2oi6 ; 212.S Derive ! 23636."Si dn[+y -/ray $tsimit ' �+eserly Bills.. Cjiit ; Iaquna Niguel, Calif 110-182-07 90212 92677* - - -- -- --- --------- =----- ---- ---- - �- -- ------ - --- -------- - - 110-164=04 i 1.10184=20" Avery C Eaton. ' Mail mwq� , 17924 Sa:iti: A4ula Circle S64 N Poplar street Ptuntain Valley,-Calif ' Manteca, Calif 110=182--07 ` : 92708 ; 95336 1113t "HuntiN. Hoorn Derive 110-184-05�:. 1 110^183-21 Santa Ara, Calif ' Joseph.M Shea. W Eiardy y17U5 i 905.:N Dickel: Gilbert Strelet W Williams ' Anar<he r Calif , 489.8 street . , 02905 Salt "Lake City Utah 941" 110-182-08 - . -- -- - -I- - -—- -07 =- - - - --------- --i---- - ----- -- --- -- - - -- - 1 110484-23 C18t-anGB J tlarJwldrl8 i QWigt,ine Aridg.w Parker ' , 8=alley K Ewividacgi . Iiri<ar►t P tiaa idrus 10922 NW Ilth " vi wwa: i 242bl liillview Drive 374 Sheers Avizuw , Gainesville, Florida ' L, - Niguel, Calif 92677 An.d*du,. Calif 84003 ' 32601 ' 11@1d1--10 110-184-10 Jean w 6mlall Charles "8 Kinixall I James •G .B rdwN 143ef Circle Mgy- 2404=iayvna"Vista Drive 9331 Nantuckat Drive. Salt Lake City, Utah Novatof Ca11t r JAmtingtiim Hoech,Calit U410-3 i 94947 92646 - - - - - - - -- - - llu-ltsl-u_ . 110-184-12 3 Waldo E jeimis Hoaaan_A`:Prancer Rxral�d.L" Knu tom . mdriel w trsiyn 5292 AllOone.Drive .40a: i2t1z Street 416 W. Lab Palms Derive i tlmtirjtorri Bmch. Calif f ' "*Anrm.gam, Cal I P%alertml Calif 92632 ' 92649 i 9264 " i I I 1 • i I -- -- -- - - - - - -------- -L-- --- - - -- -- - - - - - - -- - - r - ---- --- --- - - - -- - - - - - - I ' 111-101-20 ' Margaret Westover et al ; Lend Ur 81�s�nt 81--� 504 E W"hinytlon Avis m i Area 2.1 cXww, Calif ' I ' , 92666 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 111-101-26 Jemn M Methoock 312 N Menaf UW ' I Las &Napes,. Calif 9W36 I - -- - - - - - -- ---- - - -- - - - --- - - - --- -- ---- - -- -----+-- --- --------- - --- - - --- 111-101-29 I ' U grist An F Biery Eet. I I Alan H WAwy ' z335 Carrull .Lane iO-v didri, Calif 92025 a ' i 111-101-31 A Lxiiest L Delany u/o MictlEsel Dalarty� 6 31 L:.OMx2 U=pe Avenue Sierra Madre, Calif 91024 - --- ------- -- --- -- - -- ------------- ------ - ---- -- -- - - ----- - 111-102--01 k :View MM&WOM GUWAM s Inc i 11,0. Boot 58212.Verma Drive Las Angeles, Calif i �ii058 I I - - - -.- - -- -- - -- - - - _4- -- - --- ---------- -------T --- --- --------_ _ _ - 1 ` lli-102=13 . I ' C•G alai�r: i �lbb P�arf1:Y3:ew ' � I S-sir yfield, MD. 65804 - - - - - - - - - --- -- --- - T--- ---- ----- ------------1- ---------- ---- - - ----- --- I I I,Lww C Whitfield 'et al I ' �CC+t:r. G .1�luGf ielci � I '.!1'ti S fio6r9. Street I � j . ;vita Anik, Caf 92701 +- 1 li 1 ... -- -- - -- -- - - -- ------ -- - _ _ 7 ------ ---- - - - - -- -' ikaItjIytm .Bemj:71 cm.limzr 1 ., Tax nivisIbn 1 � 1t5 LA b Street rl F'rancisoo, Calif 94120 I ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - ' - - - - . . _ I 1 i I I I � I' I I 1 - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - I L I 1 I i I 1 Y � ' I ' I I ' I ' -- - - - - - -- --- - ---_--4---_- __- . 110-1d6-07 ; 110-200-03 Patricia G Poyyak I Lard Use Fl+waont 81-3 i Flow Seasong Fauns 9757 Ztuoan Ci rle i Area 2.1 (Mj 1%52 Scenic my Lane FbMtaini Valley, Calif I ' 92708 � ,_ � ��► Seac'.h. Calif 92648 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 110-18b--08 ; 110-186-16 111-071-25 C T Reynolds I AliOM E Huyt�r Mal H Bradley Katharine J aide J i ua y P.O. Bcoi. 270 2235-M 4"I erapdrt 14gt say P. .0. Box 3404 tamtirmgton Beach, Calif Getzville, N.Y. 14068 ! Santa Fe Springj, Calif 90670 I 92648 - - -- ---- ------ -- L- =--=--- -------- --- - ----t--..-- ----,-- - - -- - - - - - -- - 110-ib6-09 , 110-186=18 ; 41-07146 J.A Johnson i Hil r N.Cliyaae Riictzaxti J Pariseau )079.Maiden Lahe P:O. Boot 124 ' S622 Briyhtai� `Lbdvle Al tadina, Calif ! pr jar f ting0on Beach, Ca11f 91001 ; 91102 i 92649 - - - - - - - - - - - -_ -- - - + -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UU8 -0717.27 -16-10 � 110=1W-20 . I 111 Iiast�er K laybrxi R�l� C 9 i Janes.T lbxisdn ltbl.San Julian PIA''( , 1650 .3rd Street 818 14th Street LAM San Maraos, Calif � Nbr�oo, Calif ; kkV*Ar boi► Bead. Calif 92069 ' 91760 ; 92648 _ __:-_ - --.---- -- - -.----��------ ------ ------- --- --i- ------ ------- ---- --- - - 110-186-11 ' 110-1d6-21. ; 111-071-28 courge W Bainter ; 11 y le w , Vidiara Corp Carl Q*ft)xd P.O. boot 1080: i Ocean View iNus room �901 Ellis AlMhue . . Hawtbonria, Calit 18196 C-bldenmet Street tAintinijtLin Beach, Calif 9268 I 90250 Calif 92648 - - - - ---- ---- - ------- ----- --- --- - -- --- - - ------------- 110-1b6-1 i 110r170-10 111-071-29 YWatte C_L aretne ' Donald Hs4iltnn ; 006n View mahz = Q00re Inc Caurl Oaktced 1 181% .G Sumat P.O: Boot 698 69.01 Ellie-Av WOW wilmirxjton, Calif 3Beach Calif luntinyton beach, Calif 92618 ; 90748 92648 - -. . - - - - -- -- - ----- - --,----.- ------ ---- - --- -----i-- ---- -- ------ -- - - -- -- - 110-18li-13 ! 110-,210-01 111-201-02 Martin P Miler Williaina l aadi Angelina.14 Giacalorer 8906 Waknei xmuie i 11$0..S 8ewcly bri' 248 N Patton Aveaaue i eta rioEa in Valley, Calif ; Los Artiyeles, Calif I bai. .Fedib, Calif 9290'8 I_ 9W-15 � 90732 -- - -- --- - -- - -- - - - - -=---- - - ---------------- -,-- - --- - - - 11U-186--14 i 110•-I11�-02 '. 111-101-05 Eksrman NaEws Adele A Huday ; Cleora Hutd*.ist . wzzains Haift ; 2.b232 Ortega may- ' 23U0 Cadtyvn Drive 5 55 116th• Place SE S5an.Juan Cffilistraw'- Calif ; Hollywood, Calif Be1111Mt16, Waeti. 980,04 92675 I 90068 113-106-15 ' 11 , 20001 , 111-101-07 Julian 1 lkttwiay ; Don Raymond AUxecht Altm V Oou!z" P.J. 3404- 21292 Yasmolrth Latmd ; Doyle C Gilbert LA"Ita Fe %ati%s e C A.1 if � Hmtm jt on beiach, Calif 20112 D**micial Oopm Lane �oub70 I 92646 MmtiiWm Beach, Calif 92646 L - - - - r i I