The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Element Amendment 87-2c - LUE 87-2c - Zone Change 8 f FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION 1 1 Date Fehrunry1, 19RR Submitte crrrl �ayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Director, Community Development Subject: Land Use Element Amendment 87-2c/Zone Change 87-13/Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2 ORD *cA 9a 9 Consistent with Council Policy? (7Q] Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception A-5- * �'} s y3 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for the City Council's consideration is Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2C, Zone Change 87-13 and Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2 which is a request to amend the General Plan by redesignating a 65—acre site, the Meadowlark Airport, from Low Density Residential to Planned Community with a concurrent zone change from MH (mobile home maximum nine units per acre) to the Meadowlark Specific Plan which would allow 15 acres of retail commercial and 50 acres of mixed residential not to exceed 600 units (an average of 12 units per acre). RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission Action on September 29. 1987: A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUMACHER, SECOND BY PIERCE, TO RECOMMEND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 87-2 WITH AN ADDENDUM INDICATING WHERE UTILITIES, RECREATION AND WATER ARE COVERED IN THE EIR, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Silva, Schumacher, Higgins, Pierce, Leipzig, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Summerell ABSTAIN: None A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY PIERCE, TO CONTINUE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 87-2C AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 87-13 TO THE OCTOBER 20, 1987* PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Silva, Schumacher, Higgins, Pierce, Leipzig, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Summerell ABSTAIN: None * The public hearing date (as requested by applicant) was rescheduled to November 17, 1987. PIO 5185 &&a Rea4 9340 BOLSA AvE.NuE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA A NERio ENTERPRISE REACTOR• PH. CODE (714) 893-6521 February 1 , 1988 HUNTINGTON SEACI4 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Mr. Mike Adams 2000 Main Street erg 1988 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Dear Mike: P. 0. BoX 190 Huntington Beach,CA We respectfully request modification of Meadowlark Specific Plan , section F-2 as follows : Internal Circulation. - Circulation within the Specific Plan Area shall be such that a connection between Heil Avenue with Warner Avenue shall be provided. Project access points shall generally be at Warner Avenue/Leslie Lane and Heil Avenue/Del Mar Lane. Any access to Pearce Street shall be such that traffic on Pearce Street does not exceed 2500 average daily trips. Roosevelt Lane shall not be a through Street to Warner Avene. The points of intersection with Warner Avenue Heil Avenue, Pearce Street and Roosevelt Street shall generally conform to or accomplish the objectives identified in Exhibit "1". Specific locations shall be determined through thelocations shall be determined through the Conditional Use Permit process. We have discussed this with Les Evans and Bruce Gilmore who are in agreement with this request. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Very truly yours , /Nio Dick �/ 1 OWNERS COMMUNITY ASSOC. 11 A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT I � 3EA�H CI Vi TV TY To: City of Huntington Beach, Planning Commission January 28, 1988 C/O City Clerk 2000 Main Huntington Beach, Ca., 92648 Re: Development of Nerio Property ( Meadowlark Airport ) Immediately after the Planning Commission gave tentative approval for the commercial and residential development of Meadowlark Airport, a survey was taken by letter of the 120 Fernhill Association property owners. This survey showed that of the 120 owners, . 118 were against the closing • of the airport and the subsequent use -of the property for residential and commercial purposes. Possibly the Planning Commission has forgotten the significant public ' interest shown against the development of Meadowlark, which required the calling of a special meeting. This meeting was called because of the number of people who signified they wished to be heard. This group who wished to be heard was basically composed of Fernhill owners who again,. at the special meeting reiterated their feelings as shown in the above noted survey. For those who are not familiar with Fernhill, it borders the southeast portion of the Meadowlark Airport. The entire west boundary is on the airport and the northern boundary is approximately 75% on the airport. The south boundary of Fernhill is Warner Ave. and the east boundary is Graham St. As can bee seen, action taken at Meadowlark Airport is a matter of interest to Fernhill owners as it is literally in some of our backyards. The reason for our concern over Meadowlark development should now be obvious, since many of the foreseen problems were aired by Fernhill residents at various Planning Commission meetings. However in case the Commission overlooked our concerns when the vote was taken to approve the development, let us review those concerns and others that have subsequently appeared. • I Y F r OWNERS COMMUNITY ASSOC. 91 A PLANNED DEVELOP ;AE .4T I 1. Inadequate sewer capability. Twice the sewer system overfilled and spilled raw sewage at the corner of Warner and Graham. 2. Inadequate street capacity for Warner Ave. traffic. 3. Inadequate 'buffer zones" have been proposed. 10!J 4. On houses backing up to the airport there is a 9 foot elevatfd difference between Fernhill streets and adjacent airport land which can seriously compromise drainage and windflow patterns. S. There is less than 9 feet from the back wall of the east and south facing perimeter houses to the airport property line. • 6. And last, but certainly not least, is the devaluation of the Fernhill properties. Two independent appraisers were contacted and asked the question: "What effect will the development of a commercial area abutting as established 24 year old residential area have on the residential area prices." The answers were practically identical: "A minimum off 10% to as much as 25% depending on how the following items were implemented by the builder/developer: 1. Buffer zone, 2. Fences, 3. Landscaping, 4. Noise Abatement, 5. Height, proximity, and type of structures, 6. Dust and dirt generated, 7. Wind and sun blockage, • 2 OWNERS COMMUNITY ASSOC. 91 A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 8. Security consciousness, 9. Drainage plans. Further, devaluation is inevitable as many lending institutions classify residential areas which abut commercial or industrial property as "non- conforming" areas upon which they will not make loans, or if they do make loans, are subject to higher percentage down payment and loan interest rates than conforming property. In summary, this letter is a request for recognition of the needs of Fernhill owners. It appears to some that in the Planning Commission's zeal to accommodate the owners/developers of the airport property, the Fernhill property owners wants and needs, which had been noted at several planning commission meetings were disregarded or overlooked. Chairman, Board of Governors too , 80 // Z cc Huntington Beach City Council yvvT I�G O Ar 96�4,CA-f �9 1- G g tY Huntington Beach Planning Staff 3 `� �� •! V C9 Michael Mueller January 23,1988 16862 Blanton St . #M �r� 27 2 43 "t 8 E Huntington Beach,CA 92649 To whom it may concern, , I am hereby voicing my wishes and expectations regardinf the proposed Land-Use Element Amendment. 87-2c, and zone chance,,, rn 87-13.. It is my understanding that the 65 acres are currentiT zoned as low density, and have been for quite some time . I also know that Mr. Nerio has been the owner of this property for quite some time also. What - I fail to understand is how the City Council is even entertaining such a proposal. - The . neighborhoods in the immediately surrounding areas are already crowded , and parking for residents is an ever increasing pro- blem. The re-assignment of land use from anything other than the current low density would be a travesty. Huntington Beach should be proud of how it has managed to maintain growth to an effecient • and master planned city, and prostituting the long term plans of this - city should result in the removal of not only the city Planning Commision, but the entire City Council itself. ' - My on,'1y regret is , that a prior commitment forces me to miss the hearing so that -I might be able to more eloquently voice my concerns regarding this proposal. Sincerely, L _ l IN THE Superior Court #` OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange E k State of California ) S.S. County of Orange ) That 1 am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I am not a party to, nor interested in the above entitled matter, that 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the Huntington Beach Independent a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of Huntington Beach County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the disemina- tion oflocal news and intelligence of a general character,and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers,and which newspaper has been established,-printed and published at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a period exceeding one year,that the notice,of which the annexed is a printed copy,has been published in the regular and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement thereof, on thi following dates,to wit Jan. 28, 1988 1 certify(or declare)under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ' Datedat ...............Cost.....a.Mesa........................... California,this...28... . day of. .Jan. 19 88 Signature 4. Comment: What about the possibilities for Meadowlark? A progressive management at Meadowlark would long ago have allowed commuter airlines to service Meadowlark. Some twin engine turboprop commuter aircraft that serve Orange County Airport are quieter than most single engine aircraft and can use runways much shorter than Meadowlark's. As the freeways become more clogged, a commuter service to LAX becomes more valuable to Huntington Beach. Response: There have been no proposals to operate commuter flights out of Meadowlark Airport. S. Comment: Does Huntington Beach have a disaster plan? The American Red Cross says that we ARE SURE to have a disastrous earthquake within the next several years. Huntington Beach will be marooned as if on an island. The first three days are critical. Ground transportation will be nonexistent. Most freeway overpasses will be down—blocking both the freeways and the surface streets. The closest source of help will likely be from Nevada or Arizona. Response: Yes, the City of Huntington Beach has a disaster plan. The City has a division of the.- Fire Department titled "Emergency Services." Emergency Services staff has a community outreach program and would be pleased to provide you with information about their various programs. They can be reached at 536-5979 or 536-5980. 6. Comment: Please do not shortchange the value of Meadowlark Airport. We need to explore the possibility of obtaining a lease on Meadowlark for the good of Huntington Beach. Response: At the present time the City does not have any plans to obtain a lease on Meadowlark and operate the airport as a public or municipal airport. (8622d) G 3� UCLA ARCHAEOLOGY CLEARINGHOUSE 65 3Zoe UCLA ARCHAEOLOGY CLEARINGHOUSE 1. Comment: It seems that this site (an extension of CA-0RA-368) may very well be eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. Response: According to Roger Mason, staff geologist at Scientific Resource Survey (SRS), the extension of CA-ORA-368 has been determined to be not eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. This statement was verified by Rob Jackson, State Archaeologist, State Historic Preservation Office, telephone conversation July 21, 1987.- 2. Comment: The City should settle the question of the site's significance prior to the adoption of a final EIR on the project. Response: Questions regarding the above comment resulted in a phone call, by staff, to the UCLA Clearinghouse on Friday, July 17, 1987. According to Susan Colby survey archaeologist (John Parker is on vacation), determining site significance can also be rephrased as a recommendation to do further archaeological work on the site in addition to clarifying National Register status. Staff recommends that prior to any development on the proposed project site that further archaeological analysis be conducted. This could be done in phases as the development is proposed and in a timely manner so that archaeological work does not delay development and the cost of this work, to the property owner or developer, is also phased over a period of time. (�W (8622d) r J . UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES UCLA ae 2 9ERKELEY DAVIS IRVI\E • LOS IkNCELES RIVERSIDE SAN DIFG0 SAN FRANCISCO o SANTA BARBARA SANTA CRUZ v _ THE INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY _ SOUTHERN CAUFORNIA.ARCTIAEOL)GICALSURVEY WS ANCELFS•CAUFORNIA 90X4 Diana Teran Blaisure June 2, 1987 Department of Development Services 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 RE : Cultural Resource Review of EIR for Land Use Element Amendment # 87-2 Dear Diana, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above listed project. We have reviewed the historic and prehistoric site location maps, survey reports and site record files for the subject area. The following recommendations are based on the information contained in our files . There are three Archeological Reports on file with this office which cover portions of the Meadowlark Airport Parcel. The most recent of these (SRS, August 1986) deals with the question of the significance of prehistoric site CA-ORA-368 which lies partly within the project area. At the time of this most recent report, the State office of Historic Preservation had not made a final determination. It seems that this site may very well be eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places . The City should settle the question of this siteg significance prior to the adoption of a final EIR on this project. Thanks again for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Should you have any questions regarding the data in our files or these recommendations, please feel free to contact us at (213) 825-1720 or write to the above address. Sincerely, John Parker Survey Archeologist • A'1'1'ACHMHNT ! !RICHARD A. HARROW AND ASSOCIATES l 1 > t Oth Street • Huntington Beach, California 92648 • (714) 969-8385 HUNTINGTON BEACH QEVE�OPMENT SERVICES Mike Adams , Deputy Director , Dept . of Development Services Citv of Huntington Beach �+ 987 2000 Main Street P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Subject : General Plan Amendment No . 87-2C Meadowlark Airport . Dear Mr . Adams This is a follow-up of our June 23 , 1987 meeting to discuss infrastructure capacity of the sewer and water systems , as they relate to development of our property . This meeting was attended by members of the Planning Staff , Tom Dawes , Orange County Sanita- tion District , Jeff Renna , Water Dept . and Paul Cook Director of Public Works . it was a consensus of those present that the existing sewer system is nearing capacity , and the District will only agree to permit development of the proposed commercial area and a limited number of residential units this time . If additional development is desired it must be phased with available capacity . Additional capacity can be accomplished by either constructing the Coast Truck Line or ex- panding the capacity of the Slater Pump Station . The preferred alter- native is to construct the Coast Truck Line . If this can not be accomplished , the Slater Pump Station will be expanded . In anv event , when either of these improvements occur , additional development_ to our property can take place . With regard to water service , it was stated that the precise capacity of the existing system has not been determined . A phased program such as that outlined to accomodate the sewer system would be accept- able . If it is determined the existing water system is inadequate , the Water Dept . will be able to develop a water system that will accomodate development of this property as proposed , as well as other property in this area . It was a consensus that the proposed densities are not the concern but rather the impact they would have on the existing infrastructure . If development could be phased , as described above , there did not appear to be a problem with the request . Phasing of development of the property can be controlled through the Specific Plan process , wherein a specific method for tying construction of residential units to sewer and water capacity would be established . Gg Please be advised , that we are in agreement with the concept of phasing development in such a way that it will not overburden the sewer or water systems . We also feel the specific plan process is an acceptable way to accomplish this objective , and we will cooperate with your staff to incorporate this requirement in our request for a specific plan . SirLc-Ire,ly , 'R��.�I v ichard A . Harlow ATTACHMENT 8 July 17 ,198r To : Huntington Beach Planning Commission , From: Robert D . And Gwendoline M. Runyard , 5451 Old Pirate Lane, Huntington Beach , CA 92649 Subject : Objection to Requested Change in the General Plan for Meadowlark Airport . Inasmuch as we will be out of town at the time of the scheduled Planning Commission meeting , July 28 , 1987 , at which the Meadowlark Airport Site will be discussed we would like to register our objection to the applicants request for an increase from the General Plan Low Density residential . We feel that an increase in density would bring on increased traffic congestion when even now it is almost intolerable . It would also increase the smog levels . There would also be increased need for city services . It would lower the quality of life in this end of the city . We have no objection to the commercial development along Warner Ave . as this seems to be compatible with Wai ,•:,r Ave . in general . Sincerely , Gwendoline M. Runy rd Robert D . Runyard 70 7-ie-16 3 y Gifif�,S C�M '�e I� �f MEADOWLARK AIRPORT SITE .., TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FINAL REPORT Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Ouade & Douglas, Inc. ( March 198 7 � ATTACHMENT 8 ORIGINAL TRAFFIC STUDY AND REVISIONS 2 2 . A revised traffic study. The results of the revised analysis indicated that in the near term, assuming the completion of the commercial center, the three alternatives (similar to the site concepts in this report) would have similar impacts on adjacent intersections . 3 . A draft Meadowlark Specific Plan which included three options : a. Applicant ' s proposal - 15 acres of commercial 750 dwelling units . b. 15 acres of commercial, 600 dwelling units (staff recommendation) C. 15 acres of commercial, 400 dwelling units 4 . A table highlighting alternative Specific Plan concepts (see Figure 1) in the September 29 , 1987 staff report (Attachment 4) . 5. An additional alternative planning concept of "Qualified" zoning restrictions . This was suggested as an alternative to a Specific Plan. In response to items 2 through 5, and the over 40 public testimonies, the Commission passed the following motions: To recommend certification of Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2 . Direct staff to diagram conceptual site plans showing 350 and 600 units . To continue General Plan Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2C and Zone Change No. 87-13 to the October 20, 1987 Planning Commission meeting. Following the September 29, 1987 meeting, the applicant requested a further continuance to the November 17, 1987 meeting for additional time to prepare their site plan concept, which depicts 15 acres of commercial and a maximum of 750 units . The request was granted. 3 . 0 ANALYSIS: Concerns were raised by individuals testifying at the public hearing (September 29, 1987) as well as by the Planning Commission regarding the distribution of dwelling units on the residential portion of the proposed project . In response to this concern the Planning Commission requested the applicant and staff to prepare site plans for the three alternative development scenarios analyzed in the staff reports dated June 28 and September 29, 1987 . �' 9S� a d] ADOWLARK TRAFFIC ADDENDUM . MEADOWLARK NEAR TERM PROJECT ALTERNATIVES PERCENT INCREASE IN INTERSECTION CAPACTIY UTILIZED OVER NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Intersection All Project Alternatives Bolsa Chica St . /Warner Ave . . 07 Bolsa Chica St . /Heil Ave . . 02 Heil Ave . /Graham St . . 01 Warner Ave . /Graham St . . 06 Note : The above percentages reflect net changes in intersection Volume / Capacity ratios excluding the effects of traffic attributable to the proposed Bolsa Chica development . Including these traffic projections would not significantly change the net difference between the intersection capacity utilized with the No Project alternative or the other project -'alternatives . i MEADOWLARK LONG TERM PROJECT ALTERNATIVES PERCENT INCREASE IN INTERSECTION CAPACTIY UTILIZED OVER NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE Intersection Project Alternatives A B C Bolsa Chica St . /Warner Ave . .05 . 05 . 03 Bolsa Chica St . /Heil Ave . . 08 . 07 . 06 Heil Ave . /Graham St . . 01 . 01 . 01 Warner Ave . /Graham St . . 04 . 04 . 03 Note : The above percentages reflect net changes in intersection Volume / Capacity ratios excluding the effects of traffic attributable to the proposed Bolsa Chica development . Including these traffic projections would not significantly change the net difference between the intersection capacity utilized with the No Project alternative or any of the other project alternatives . I I I SIGNAL LANDMARK TRIP GENERATION AS PROPOSED JULY 1987 ( FOR INTERNAL USE WITHIN THE CITY ONLY) Trip Generation Rates : Intensity Rate units/acre per unit 6 . 5 9 . 0 9 . 5 8 . 5 16 . 0 7 . 0 18 . 0 6 . 5 21 . 0 6 . 0 25 . 0 5 . 0 30 . 0 5 . 0 Trip Generation : Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 4 un/ac Trips un/ac Trips Commercial acres Trips 6 . 5 387 18 . 0 1716 19 10450 9 . 5 2193 21 . 0 1632 (@ 550/acre) 16 . 0 910 25 . 0 955 Hotel 21 . 0 1962 30 . 0 1600 acres Trips 25 . 0 2035 10 2800 (@ 280/acre ) 13250 (@ 69%) Total : 7487 5903 9140 Total Near Term ( 1991) Trips : (@ 60% • Phase 1 ) = 4495 ADT Peak Hour : 360 In : 215 Out : 145 Total Long Term ( 1996) Trips : ( Phases 1 & 2 + 69% Phase 4 ) = 22530 ADT Peak Hour : 1800 TABLE 1 EXISTING AND NEAR-TERM AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION VOLUMEXAPACITY RATIOS Near Term1 Without Bolsa Chica Traffic With Bolsa Chica Traffic Without With Without With Intersection Existing Pro,ect Project Project Project 2 2 .86 .2 902'4 Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .88 86 V (.84 Bolsa Chica-Street/Iieil Avenue .65 .74 .76 .83 .86 Heil Avenue/Graham Street -- .373 .383 .373 .383 Warner Avenue/Graham Street .59 .67 .71 .70 .74 1Assumes recommended mitigations measures as listed below. 2Assumes arterial improvements currently planned by the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue and a separate westbound right turn lane on Warner Avenue. 3Assumes that a two-phased signal is in place. 4Assumes a separate northbound right turn lane on Bolsa Chica Street. ,.ti `1 • J 1 TABLE 2 LONG-TERM AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLURIE/CAPACITY RATIOSI Without Bois& Chica Development Traffic With Bolsa Chica Development Traffic Project Project Project Project Project Project Without Alternative Alternative Alternative Without Alternative Alternative Alternative Intersection Project A B C Pro ect A B C Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .842 .892 .892 .882 .952,6 1.02,6 .992,6 .982,6 6c`s., Chica Street/Heil Avenue .883 .854 .854 .844 .904 .894,5 .894,5 .884,5 HeJ Avenue/Graham Street .42 .43 .43 .43 .42 .43 .43 .43 Warner Avenue/Graham Street .78 .82 .82 .81 .84 .87 .87 .86 ' Assumes arterial improvements proposed by the City, proposed near-term mitigations and recommended mitigation measures listed below. Assumes a separate northbound right turn and second eastbound left turn lane. 3Assumes a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. 4Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. 5Assumes a second northbound left turn lane. 6Assumes a second northbound through lane and altered signal phasing. 87-2c ADDENDUM Planning Commission Staff Report July 28, 1987 This Addendum contains supportive material, revised analysis and additional information generated and or received regarding the subject site since the last public hearing on June 2, 1983— ThP fnlln.i,inv ;ro.,,T re discussed in this Addendum: o Revised Traffic Analysis ' �`_" r-ti7Une7 study session, the Planning Commission requested staff to have the traffic analysis revised to include potential impacts from the proposed development in the Bolsa Chica. A summary of that revision is included in this addendum and the full revision is an attachment to the Staff Report. o Moody Circle Issues Issues have been raised regarding the existing connection of Moody Circle to Pearce Street, and the possibility of continuing Moody Circle to the south. Item No. 3 addresses those issues. o Airport Water Well 41 In a recent meeting with applicant, a question was raised regarding the feasible future use, by the City's Water Department of an existing water well on the airport site. Item No. 4 reports the results of the Water Departments assessment of the well. o Hazardous Materials It was recently brought to staff's attention that two gas stations on the corner of Bolsa Chica and Warner have underground storage tanks that are leaking gasoline. Item No. 6 assess that situation and its potential impacts to the airport site. o Revised Economic Considerations A member of the Airport Board made staff aware of the fact that the City receives personal property tax revenue on aircraft tied—down (or domiciled) at Meadowlark Airport. The Economic Considerations section of the EIR was revised to include that revenue. I. REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS In the previous traffic impact study conducted for the proposed development of the Meadowlark Airport Site (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. — March, 1987), future traffic volumes at the time the project's commercial phase is completed (near—term — 1991) and at the project's overall completion (long—term — 1996), were developed by factoring 1986 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) by a 3.5 percent annual growth factor. This factor was developed based on average traffic volume growth within the City of Huntington Beach over the past six years. As such, it was assumed to be a reasonable measurement to base anticipated growth in future traffic attributable to general land use intensification, o development and through travel in the City. d However, in light of the significant size and proximity of the proposed Bolsa Chica development, some measurement of the projected traffic attributable to this project was necessary in addition to the above increase in background traffic. To accomplish this, staff contacted the Signal Landmark planning department and requested their best estimate of the amount of development to be completed by 1991 and 1996, which are the anticipated completion dates for Phase 1 (Commercial) and 2 (Residential) of the proposed Meadowlark project. Parsons, Brincherhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. utilized this data to prepare an analysis which includes traffic from Bolsa Chica development. It is difficult to determine traffic flows at this time because of uncertainties regarding the ultimate street system. PBQ&D did, however, estimate the future levels of service based on normal growth proposed Meadowlark development, anticipated Bolsa Chica traffic and the cummulative impacts of all three scenarios. As expected, future arterial levels of service will decrease greatly, especially on Heil Avenue between Bolsa Chica and Springdale, Warner Avenue and Algonquin and Springdale and Bolsa Chica Street between Edinger and Warner. (See Table 1 of Attachment 5). According to PBQ&D, peak hour intersection levels of service will also decrease. Three key intersections, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue, Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street are analyzed below for the following anticipated scenarios: 1. Existing Conditions 2. Background traffic — assuming normal growth rate at 3.5% 41 3. Project Traffic 4. Bolsa Chica Traffic 5. Cummulative Traffic — based on all the above impacts The analysis assumes that all mitigation measures suggested by PBQ&D are in place. Mitigation measures were proposed where the level of service falls below LOS 'D' because intersections operating at LOS 'D' can be expected to accomodate a high density but stable traffic flow. The other two intersections, Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive and Heil Avenue/Graham Street, which were analyzed in the original report, remained at LOS 'A' throughout PBQ&D's analysis and are not addressed in this revised analysis. Existing Conditions (Table 1) Currently, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue is operating at LOS 'D'. Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue is operating at LOS 'C'. Warner Avenue/Graham Street is operating at LOS 'A'. Near Term Traffic (Table 1) Assuming that proposed arterial improvements (three eastbound and three westbound though lanes on Warner Avenue) are in place, levels of service based on background traffic will decrease. Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue is expected to operate at LOS 'D' although some improvement in capacity over existing conditions is gained with additional through lanes on Warner Avenue. Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street will operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS 'C' or better). 9 (8622d) ►, s TABLE 1 Existing and Near Tern Afternoon Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service (With Mitigation) Existing Background Project Bolsa Chica Cummulative Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue D 0 D D D Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 8 C C' D D Warner Avenue/Graham Street A B C' C' C' 1. No mitigation suggested TABLE 2 Long—Tern Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service (With Mitigation) Background Project Bolsa Chica Cummulative Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue D D E E Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 0 0 D D Warner Avenue/Graham Street D' 0' 0 . 0 1. No mitigation suggested 0 (8622d) �f -3 The addition of peak hour project traffic does not significantly change the levels of service discussed above for the new-term background traffic scenario, provided suggested mitigation measures are in place. With the addition of anticipated Bolsa Chica near-term traffic volumes, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue will operate at LOS 'D', assuming mitigation is in place. Warner Avenue/Graham Street will operate at LOS'C'. When background, project and Bolsa Chica traffic impacts are considered together, levels of service will remain at LOS 'D' for Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue. Again, Warner Avenue/Graham street will operate at LOS 'C'. Long Term Traffic Impacts (Table 2) Assuming that the suggested mitigation measures are in place, background traffic levels of service will decrease. All the intersections will operate at LOS 'D'. The addition of peak hour project traffic, with mitigation, does not change the levels of service discussed above. All three intersections will operate at LOS 'D'. The addition of Bolsa Chica traffic is expected to require additional measures to mitigate impacts. Assuming that the mitigation measures are in place, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue will decrease to LOS 'E'. Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street are expected to operate at LOS 'D'. When background, project and Bolsa Chica impacts are considered together, the levels of service for the three intersections remain the same as above, assuming that the suggested mitigation measures are in place. In summary, the levels of service in the area surrounding the Meadowlark site will decrease measurably in the next ten years, largely due to normal growth and anticipated Bolsa Chica development. Only a small portion of the increased traffic is attributable to the proposed Meadowlark development. 2. MOODY CIRCLE ISSUES Moody Circle is not located within the study area, however, it is within close proximity to the west. The street is presently the focus of considerable debate regarding whether or not it should remain as a cul-de-sac connected to Pearce Street, or whether it should be blocked off at Pearce and continued further to the south. It is appropriate to analyze the Moody Circle issue in relation to Meadowlark Airport. The traffic and circulation section of Environmental Impact Report 87-2 indicates the need to retain Pearce Street as an access point for Meadowlark Airport. The connection of Pearce Street to Meadowlark, however, is to be designed in a manner which would minimize the use of Pearce. The continued connection of Moody Circle to Pearce Street will have no impact on the connection of Pearce Street to Meadowlark. If Moody Circle is blocked off at Pearce Street, there are two general alternatives for continuing it to the south. One option is to continue it a short distance south and then turn it out to Bolsa Chica Street. The second option is to continue it south to where it would connect with a second street running east and west. This street would then connect to Bolsa Chica Street and Meadowlark Airport. (8622d) Although circulation planning for Meadowlark Airport has not included this second access point south of and parallel to Pearce Street, it could be accommodated. Because this street would never be signalized at Bolsa Chica Street (and probably would not permit left turns), it should not be utilized entirely in place of Pearce Street. Rather, Pearce Street and this second street could both serve as access to Meadowlark Airport. In summary, any of the Moody Circle alternatives can be accommodated in planning for Meadowlark Airport. None of the alternatives, however, will permit Pearce Street to be discontinued as access to Meadowlark. The largest issues are the impacts of the Moody Circle alternatives on the marketability and design of the parcels south of Moody Circle which would be bi-sected by the continuation of the street. These issues are not within the purview of Environmental Impact Report 87-2. 3. AIRPORT WATER WELL At a recent meeting, that included the applicant, a discussion of an existing water well on the airport property raised some questions regarding the future inclusion of that well in the City's water system. Water Department staff conducted an assessment of the well to determine if it would be feasible, in the future, to incorporate the well into the City's water supply system. Their investigation resulted in a determination that it would not be cost effective to utilize the well. The reasons for their determination are as follow: 1. The well is too shallow. 2. The well is vulnerable to contamination from hazardous materials leaking from gas stations near the airport. 3. The well is near the end of its useful life. 4. The well has a history of low production. 4. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS A. Underground Storage Tanks 1. On-site Tanks According to the Orange County Healthcare Agency, Environmental Health, Waste Management Section, there are two known underground storage tanks in the study area. The tanks must be removed and the soil must be tested for contamination. If the soil or groundwater is contaminated, the Regional Water Quality Control Board should be contacted for cleanup requirements. Aa (8622d) �7'L S MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY ADDENDUM -SEPTEMBER 1987 The previous traffic impact study conducted for the Meadowlark Airport site (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. - March 1987), examined the effects of the following proposed development: Commercial - 14 acres Senior Citizen Housing - 250 units Medium Density Residential - 450 units High Density Residential - 375 units Since that time three new alternative development scenarios have been proposed. All three alternatives assume 15 acres of commercial use, in addition to one of the following residential densities: Applicant's proposal - 750 units, Alternative One - 600 units and Alternative Two - 400 units. The associated number of trips anticipated to be generated by each of these proposals have been summarized in Table 1. To estimate the traffic effects of the respective reductions in residential units over the former project development as proposed in the March 1987 traffic study, near and long term afternoon peak hour intersection capacity analyses were conducted. To accomplish this, the former near and long term project traffic was adjusted according to the percent difference posed by each alternative's estimated trip generation. For example, in the near term the traffic associated with all three alternatives (Applicant's, Alternative One, and Alternative Two) is projected to increase by 7% because of an increase in commercial acreage from 14 in the former project to 15 acres for each of the latest proposed alternatives. In the long term a reduction in trips over the former March 1987 proposed project is expected for all current alternatives as follows: Applicant's - 10% decrease, Alternative One - 18% decrease, and Alternative Two - 38% decrease. Following the same intersection capacity analysis methodology as outlined in the March study, volume/capacity (V/C) ratios and corresponding levels of service were developed. Tables 2 and 3 summarize these results for the near term, both excluding traffic attributable to the Bolsa Chica development and including this traffic. /3 -1- As can be seen in Table 2, without including the anticipated Bolsa Chica development traffic, all key intersections are expected to operate at "acceptable" service levels (Level of Service - LOS 'D' or better). Including project traffic is anticipated to necessitate a separate westbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Varner Avenue intersection to mitigate LOSE' conditions. This latter measure is expected to be necessary to mitigate LOS 'E' conditions at this intersection for the no project scenario if Bolsa Chica traffic projections are included (see Table 3). With the addition of project traffic, the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection is expected to require a separate northbound right turn lane as well. For the long term scenario, assuming the City's planned improvements of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on 'Varner Avenue and the recommended near term mitigations are in place, the no project alternative excluding the traffic projections for the Bolsa Chica Development is expected to require a separate northbound right turn lane and an additional eastbound left turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection and a second westbound through lane and altered signal phasing at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection (see Table 4). Adding estimated traffic projections associated with the Applicant's alternative is expected to require the same measures as the no project alternative with the addition of a separate southbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection. Table 5 presents the estimated intersection service levels associated with the project's Alternatives One and Two development scenarios (without Bolsa Chica traffic projections). These two alternatives result in a 0 - 2% reduction in intersection capacity utilized over the Applicant's proposal. The same mitigation measures recommended for the Applicant's proposal are anticipated to be necessary for Alternative One or Two. Table 6 summarizes the results of the long term intersection analyses including Bolsa Chica Development traffic projections for the no project and Applicant's alternatives. 14 -2- i In this scenario, the same two intersections (Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue) are anticipated to require mitigation as in the scenario excluding Bolsa Chica traffic. However, in this case, an additional eastbound left-turn lane and second northbound through lane is anticipated to be necessary at Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue while Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue is expected to require an additional westbound through lane, altered signal phasing and a separate southbound right turn lane. In addition to these mitigations, adding Applicant's project traffic projections is expected to require a second northbound left turn lane at Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue. Table 7 summarizes the results of the analyses for Alternatives One and Two. These alternatives are anticipated to reduce intersection capacity utilized from 0 - 3% over Applicant's proposal and are expected to necessitate the same mitigation measures as proposed above for Applicant's proposal. The intersection capacity worksheets are available for review following Table 7. 15 -3- TABLE 1 MEADOWLARK TRIP GENERATION FOR APPLICANT' S PROPOSAL AND CITY PROPOSED LAND USES LAND USE SCENARIOS APPLICANTS ALTERNATIVE #1 : ALTERNATIVE #2 ; - --------------- --------------- -------------- UNITS/ TRIP RATE # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF LAND USE ACRE RATE UNIT UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS RESIDENTIAL ,8. 0 9. 0 D . U. 400 3600 12. 0 8. 0 D . U. 600 4800 15. 0 7 . 0 D . U. 750 5250 ; COMMERCIAL ---- 600. 0 ACRE 15 9000 15 9000 15 9000 - --------------- --------------- - --------------- ' TOTAL 14250 13800 12600 TABLE 2 NEAR-TERM AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ALL PROJECT ALTERNATIVES (without Bolsa Chica Development Traffic) Without Project With Project Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .86 D .93 E .85 D3 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .33 A .36 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue .74 C .76 C Heil Avenue/Graham Street .37 A .38 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .67 B .73 C lAssumes arterial improvements currently planned by the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. 2Assumes that a two-phased signal is in place. 3Assumes a separate westbound right turn lane at Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street. v �O TABLE 3 NEAR-TERM AFTERNOON PEAR HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE1 ALL PROJECT ALTERNATIVES (with Bolsa Chica Development Traffic) Without Project With Project Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .92 E .86 D3 .99 E .88 D3,4 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .35 A2 .36 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue .76 E .78 C Heil Avenue/Graham St 2 Street .37 A .38 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .70 C .77 C IAssumes arterial improvements currently planned by the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. 2Assumes that a two-phased signal is in place. 3 Assumes a separate westbound right turn lane at Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street. 4Assumes a separate northbound right turn lane at Varner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street. TABLE 4 LONG-TERM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE1 APPLICANT'S ALTERNATIVE (without Bolsa Chica Development Traffic) Without Project With Applicant's Alternative Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .97 E .84 D2 1.02 F .89 D2 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .40 A .43 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.08 F .88 D3 1.16 F .85 D4 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .42 A .43 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .78 C .82 D lAssumes arterial improvements proposed by the City and proposed near-term mitigations. 2Assumes a separate northbound right turn and second eastbound left turn lane. 3Assumes a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. 4Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. O TABLE 5 LONG-TERM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICEI ALTERNATIVES ONE AND TWO (without Bolsa Chica Development Traffic) Alternative One Alternative Two Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue 1.02 F .89 D2 1.00 F .88 D2 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .43 A .42 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.15 F .85 D3 1.14 F .84 D3 1 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .43 A .43 A 00 ' Warner Avenue/Graham Street .82 D .81 D lAssumes arterial improvements proposed by the City and proposed near-term mitigations. 2Assumes a separate northbound right turn and second eastbound left turn lane. 3Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. TABLE 6 LONG—TERM PEAR HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE1 APPLICANTS ALTERNATIVE (with Bolsa Chica Development Traffic) Without Project With Applicant's Alternative Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue 1.14 F .95 E2 1.19 F 1.00 E2 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .48 A .50 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.17 F .90 D3 1.26 F .89 D3,4 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .42 A .43 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .84 D .87 D 1Assumes arterial improvements proposed by the City and proposed near-term mitigations. 2Assumes a second northbound through lane and second eastbound left turn lane. 3Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. 4Assumes a second northbound left turn lane. TABLE 7 LONG—TERM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICEI ALTERNATIVES ONE AND TWO (with Bolsa Chica Development Traffic) Alternative One Alternative Two Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue 1.18 F .99 E2 1.17 F .98 E2 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .50 A .50 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.24 F .89 D3 1.23 F .88 D3 �. Ileil Avenue/Graham Street .43 A .43 A 0 Warner Avenue/Graham Street .87 D .86 D lAssumes arterial improvements proposed by the City and proposed near-term mitigations. 2Assumes a separate northbound right turn, a second northbound through lane and second eastbound left turn lane, and altered signal phasing. 3Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a second northbound left turn lane, and a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane. ` ��-N V;�E3 C3 1,4 E; E3 F-< I t\l EE F--c t-A C3 F-:::-F--' C-_F�: I -T I ��4 L__ M C-)%,A E=_t�l F_-_P,11 V,Ui=�j L_V'_'� 1 E3 �� r"I oc�F-< F F=-F-z 11 1 14 C-) P,F:;:(D 13 C:�� DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE f> SATURATION F310l� CRITICAL N/S VOL IOE3_1.21 CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 �17 CRITICAL SUM -1L �t IL C-51 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY HOR[HBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WID( H Nov WlD|H 1 Rl . 15. 0 R. . 12.0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15, 0 2 L. 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 l ' . 12. 0 3 , , . . . . . [. . 12.0 T. . 12' 0 [. , 12. 0 12. 0 L. . 1:41.. Q 12' 0 ' ' ' ' . ' ' . ' . ' ' . ' . ' ' . . . ' . . ' ' . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [RAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 71 801 257 113 THRU 132 204 1190 945 RIGHT 81 511 34 432 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR � NORTHBOUND 5 3 ' 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 95 � WESTBOUND 5 3 ' 95 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED � / PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) � CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS ~- / CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 222 238 449 491 LEFT 30 460 246 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 71 801 257 113 ADJUSTED VOL 30 877 246 0 CAPACITY 0 0 0 288 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK � | � F'ARSOhJS E-cR I hJCh=-ERHQFIc CR I T I CAI—. M(D%,.1EM FEE N-T AhJtc�ILYS I S EiOI_SA CH I CA / WARhJEF: hJEAFi TERM JrJ / F'RO.SECT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION C�pl-T'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL _7tf5k3 CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 7� CRITICAL SUM :1 '4- LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. C% R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. C-) RT. 1`;. C� ? L. . R. . 1 Cj T. . 12. C T. . 12. f . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. C� 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 1�'. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 71 925 257 11 THRU 1'2 2t)4 1242 981 RIGHT 81 511 34 509 TRUCES (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 222 238 468 530 LEFT 30 536 246 0 LEFT TURN CHECk, NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 71 925 257 113 ADJUSTED VOL _,C I l c�21 246 i i CAPACITY G C) C) 3C)8 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A Of-:,. F'AFiSONS E{F:Z I r4(--KEFtiHOF"F CF: I T I CAI___ MOVEMENT' AN ink LYS I S E;OL-SA CH I CA / WARNEF=< IV FEE AIR TM W / F'F=cQ W / M I T DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE _D SATURATION C�_p'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL ? 8 CRITICAL E/W VOL 6 4 E3 CRITICAL SUM 1 -4 0'4!5=31 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. C) R. . 12.. ) RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 L. . 12. o R. . 12.0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12.�� T. . 12. T. . 1�. i� 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12.. T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12.(--) . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 71 9='5 2`57 113 THRU 132 2o4 1242 981 RIGHT 81 511 34 5�)8 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 3 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 .3 . 915 WESTBOUND 5 3 .95 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 222 238 468 402 LEFT 30 536 246 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 71 925 257 1 1._1 ADJUSTED VOL 3(-) 1021 246 0 CAPACITY i) G 66 180 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OF..:: AS PARSONS 1BFR I NCk<ERHOFF CR I -7T I CAL MOtiJEMEhhIT ANAI_YS I S SOI _SA GH I CA / WARh1ER hDEAR TERM NO F'ROJ CT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 �E- LEVEL OF SERVICE_ E-= SATURATION '9:2 CRITICAL N/S VOL 4!5=3.7 E3 CRITICAL E/W VOL S::f7;iB CRITICAL SUM 1 ts 1 b LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 EFT. 15. C-) R. . 12'. 0 RT. 15. (--) RT. 15. C) 2 L. . 12. C) R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. C) T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12. C) T. . 12. C) T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. C) 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 7(.-) 8C)0 31 o 115 THRU 130 2C)5 1260 1(--)55 RIGHT 80 590 35 430 TRUCk::S ('l.> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 53 . 95 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -FIGHT 219 239 475 531 LEFT 29 459 307 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 70 BOO 31 C) 115 ADJUSTED VOL 29 876 307 0 CAPACITY 0 C) C) ._,6-? MOVEMENT` N/A N/A N/A 0k:: PARSONS EcF� I r\J FEE F<HOFF CR I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANAI__-YS I S 13C3L_SA CH I CA / WAI:R"F= NR _ TM NO F'RO W ! M I T (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE I7 SATURATION 8 6% CRITICAL N/S VOL 6-78 CRITICAL E/W VOL -=�9 CRITICAL SUM 1 -e:L- 1 -1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. C) R. . 12. C) RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 L. . 12. C-► R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12. C) T. . 12. T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12.0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND . LEFT 70 8C)C) '10 115 THRU 1?(.-) 2C)5 1260 1 )55 RIGHT 80 59C-) 35 430 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _, . 95 SOUTHBOUND S _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 219 239 475 432 = LEFT 29 459 307 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 70 8C)c_) 1 c_) 115 ADJUSTED VOL 29 876 C)7 CAPACITY C) C) 43ti 264 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK: a� F-ink F=iSONS EcF,: I IVCF----EF=;:HOFF iCFR I T I CAI_ MOW FEE MIEN-IF ink NAL_NeE;- I S E- 1—IC3Fa CH I CAIWAF=titVEF;: NEgc�F=1 -TEFRM W/F'FRC3 jECT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION 99'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL _7tf;t r CRITICAL E/W VOL E3-'6 CRITICAL SUM 1 E6 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. ci R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. U RT. 15. i) 2 L. . 12.. i) R. . 12. i) T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. () - . . T. . 12. i) T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. , 12. o L. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 70 925 ?1�� 115 THRU 1.7.0 2)5 1'1i) ii>9i) RIGHT 8C) 590 35 505 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAT: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 .. . 95 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 95 WESTBOUND 5 3 . 95 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ; 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 219 239 49.3 569 LEFT 29 536 307 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 70 925 31 115 ADJUSTED VOL 29 1021 ?07 ii CAPACITY 0 i) 0 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK P*ink FRE3- C71VE3 E-c F.< I tVCf _EF=,:HOt=E CR •I" T I Cic�t_ t"iC EtVT at\JAL_YS I S; ]E-CC:)LSA Ct-1 I CA / WAF=;:tVE Eo-lam -T-M W / F'F;:O W / M I T' (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION C#E3'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 1591:12, CRITICAL E/W VOL Ytv CRITICAL SUM I r4.4';5 3i•if•###aE•�•�-iE#aF•�E•�4-�•#•lf•#�#aF-�••k��•�•�•*•3E•�-#�••�•IE if•�(••�E••iF•lF LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 T . . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T•. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 1 . 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 70 925 ?10 115 THRU 130 Qt- 1 10 1 090 RIGHT 80 590 15 50.5 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 . 95 WESTBOUND 5 T. V5 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 156 239 493 446 LEFT 29 536 307 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 70 925 310 115 ADJUSTED VOL 29 1021 307 i CAPACITY 0 0 47 260 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A Ok:: F 4NF:SCINS E{F;z I 54ED !QF 14E3F-F GR I" T I CAL t-1Cp T AI'-JAtLV'S I S IBC 1 SA GH I GA / WARNEF: LCIt',tG -f El;:t 1 t\t0 F'F:C30 GT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE E_ SATURATION '9-7 f CRITICAL N/S VOL E3tj{-? CRITICAL E/W VOL i mE3 CRITICAL SUM ]_ t5'4'-' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE. MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 - . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 8=E 1099 3 5, 134 THRU 157 242 1475 1165 RIGHT 96 607 40 6�3 TRUCKS ('/.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 249 266 527 452 LEFT" 42 610 286 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1 099 305 134 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1162 286 CAPACITY i 0 7 5 211 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A 0k.* ao ^ . �icb F.<E3 C3 fq E3 �� 1 P4(--V::-E-=F..,:"C)1-�:-F=- c�FI: I _T I L_ M c:) m I-=r%j_�F 02�P11 fc�t-N,E; I E3 �� '� I C�ink Z W dc�k F-C t\J[-=F;: L_IN4 C3 m PA C:) [='F;z C3 � Z M I _T_ DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE ID SATURATION �3-%'X_ CRITICAL N/S VOL -7 E3 4!E), CRITICAL E/W VOL ��C-]-�� CRITICAL SUM 1 ��EB ID ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 12' 0 R' ' 12' 0 T. ' 12' 0 T' ' 12. 0 3 L. . 12. 0 T' . 12' 0 T. ' 12. 0 T. ' 12' 0 4 . . . . . . ' L. . 12. 0 L. 12' 0 T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . ' . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12' 0 L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . ' ' ' . . . ' . ' ' . . . . . ' . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1099 305 134 THRU 157 242 1475 1165 RIGHT 96 607 40 603 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 176 266 527 452 LEFT 42 610 150 0 ' LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1099 305 134 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1162 286 0 CAPACITY 0 0 75 75 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK ) ,31 F'AFRE;CJtVG EiF;: I t\JGI<F—=-F=;:"C3 F=-F= GF I T I GAL_ MCpVI-M FEE NI-IF AI*\JAL_YE3 I S ECC1L_SA CI-1 I GF:�k / I+JAF:t\IEF;� L_CIINJC3 TEAM dnkt='F'L_ I GAMT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE 1== SATURATION 1 c-31" l CRITICAL N/S VOL 9' 1 9 CRITICAL E/W VOL _74!5:N CRITICAL SUM I 8 I LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. () L. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . ,, . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 1.2. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1205 312 1.34 THRU 157 242 1538 1206 RIGHT 96 612 40 674 TRUCKS ('/.) LOCAL FUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 QPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 249 266 549 468 LEFT 42 670 294 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 64 1205 312 114 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1278 294 C� CAPACITY 0 0 81 213 MOVEMENT" N/A N/A N/A OK 3a ' ' r-,ink F::;:c-3 C3 tq E; Ec F: 1 P4 I---F-c"C3 F-F.'::- �F:;: T -r- I C�dc%L_ M C)%.,P F=_M F_=t%,J_1F dnk rlJ fc%I 'V ICE; 1 11�3 ' E-3��L_1�3 I W dc�F:;:t\J I-E F-< I PA CE; -IF M F=*L_(7-[NJ_F w m I -IF DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE ID SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM 1 �l 4!5�E3 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12. 0 R. . 12.0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. 12' 0 R. 12.0 T' . 12. 0 T' . 12. 0 3 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12' 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. 12.0 L. . 12' 0 T. ' 12. 0 5 ' . ' . . . ' L. . 12'0 L' . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . ' , ' . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1205 312 134 THRU 157 242 1538 1206 � RIGHT 96 612 40 674 ! | � TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 ^ 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2' HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 176 266 549 468 ' LEFT 42 670 154 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1205 312 134 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1278 294 0 CAPAClTY 0 0 81 73 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK � 33 � F'AFiE;CMNS EcF� I hJCk==IEF►.HCIEF CFi I -IF I CAL_ MC34'EMEh-IT AIVAL_YE; I S E- CIL_S; c: I C:A / wdfAF•:thJEF;: L_CDh1C T E=FRM At _r _ 1 DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F" SATURATION 1 r-1-:2'/_ CRITICAL_ N/S VOL 91 4 CRITICAL E/W VOL Tb 1 CRITICAL SUM 1 6�-7ts LANE GEOMETRY NOi;THDOUND SOUTHBOUND EAST OUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L.. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1196 312 134 THRU 157 242 1512 1203, RIGHT 96 612 40 668 TRUCKS ( ) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND `_, _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 249 266 547 467 LEFT 42 665 294 U LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1196 '12 154 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1268 294 0 CAPACITY 0 8(:) 214 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK F*02h Fz E3(D V4 E3 E�F< I PACCVz-_EFZ"C3F:-- F CFti I T T COIL MlC) EMIEPVT A INJ�I NeE3 I S EEc L_.E3A CFl I L_.dc% 1 Wdc�F-<P�IEFti L_P`JC3 TM AL_-IF _ I W ! M I T DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE ICJ SATURATION E3 CRITICAL N/S VOL E3 Zl I CRITICAL E/W VOL 6`? I CRITICAL SUM 1 -•6 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOU-fHBC)UND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH NOV WIDI'H MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12, o R. . RT. 15. i> R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 R. . 1^ . ii T. . 12. C> T. . 12.0 T. 1'2'. C T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. c) L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. i) . . . . . . . L. . 12. C) L. . 12. 0 L. . I C 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1196 :7.12 1314 THRU 157 242 15•V2 1203 RIGHT 96 612 4(--) 668 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 31 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 176 266 547 467 LEFT 42 6615 154 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1196 12 134 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1268 294 0 CAPACITY C-) C) 80 74 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK 35 F'AFRS;C7hJE; E4R I NiCF--=EF{HC7iFF- CCF:;: I T I Cr441 MC7VEM1_=PQT AIRIALYE; I E3 E{CJC_.SA CI—i I C:A / WAF-<hBER I C]tVCE; T"IEF;:M ink C_T DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F- SATURATION 1 c=11 c_]p CRITICAL_ N/S VOL c-?t*--y I CRITICAL E/W VOL _7 S_ CRITICAL_ SUM I 4!Sp�__5pcS LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L.('NE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV W I DTH 1 RT. iS. C) R. . 12. �� RT. 15. �� R. . 1 '. C� 2 L. . 1^•_. 0 R. . 1?. U T. . ].2. i) f . . 1'?. . . . . . . . f. . 12. I... . 1.2. C) T. 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. 12. C) T. . 12. C1 U . . . . . . . L. . 12. C� . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1172 7;1C) 134 THRU 1 r-7 2'4 ' :L'S 18 1 19 RIGHT 96 611 40 652 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 ._ 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . U — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 249 266 542 463 LEFT 42 65A 292 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1172 310 134 ADJUSTED VOL 42 124' ?92 G CAPACITY O C) 79 21 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A UF; 3� F•FaRSCOt�1S EiF:-< I Ih1C2F=:Et=RHC3F=F CF=;: I T I CdnbiL MC3VEMEPJ-IF Ah•JdnkL1r'S I S E-cC7t_S0k CH I C;A / WAFttV FEE 1FZ t P4C3 TM dc�IA-IF _ W / M I T DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE L} SATURAT I ON E3£3 CRITICAL N/S VOL E3�8 CRI-f IC:AL E/W VOL 15=b I ot5n. CRITICAL SUM 1444 LANE GEOMETRY a0R'r i-120L.1N;) SOUTHDOUND E ASTDOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 1 i'. O R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. C) R. . I C T. . 1 .. C) R. . 1'�'. i) T. . 1 . i) T. . 1 i) L. . 1.2. i) 1 . . 1X. T. . 12. 0 f. . 12. i) 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12.Q L. . 12. ( T. . 12. C) 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12.. 0 L. . 12. (_) L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 117 ' 31C-) 134 THRU 157 242 1518 11931 RIGHT 96 61. 1 4(__) 652 TRUCE:::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NOR T'HBOUND = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 —1 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 176 266 542 46:7, LEFT 42 652 15:7, 0 LEFT TURN CHECk; NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I NF'UT VOLUME o4 1 172 71 134 ADJUSTED VOL_. 4-21242 1•'_92 C) CAPACITY i) i) 79 74 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK �3 F'AF:SCMhAS E-9Fi I IV(--:Ff FEE F:;:"C1F"F" )CF: I T I GAL MC)w1=m I=—t\JT Ah10AL_YE I S EC CAL_'r�,- oc1 C_— I CA / W02AFR0NAEF: L_Clh.lC-3 _FEF:M INJCI F'F:L7.1 CT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE FF= SATURATION I 1 -1 CRITICAL N/S VOL -"E3- V CRITICAL E/W VOL I t a I CRITICAL SUM 1. E3 7 alf5p LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV W I DTH MOU W:[DTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 141. 0 R. . 12. C) R.T. ].5. C) R. 12. 0 2 T. . C) R. . 1' . C) T. 12. C) T. _ L.. . 12. C) T. . 12. C) T. . 12. C) T. . 12,. C) 4 . . . . . . . L. . i C) L. . 12. C) T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT C;5 1. 1 C)C) 48C) J.'S THRU 155 245 1'755 1 58C RIGHT 95 87C) 4o 600 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 :71 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8(--) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 174 269 624 612 LEFT 44 610 479 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 8ts 1 IC)C) 48C) 135 ADJUSTED VOL 44 1167 479 C) CAPACITY C) CJ 12 467 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK. 39 F•AiFiSO1*IS E-C1=;: I h E=-:FiH01=F CF•: I T I CAL_ MOVEMENT AIV*CiL_YS I S EcOL—SA CH :IC C:;ink / WAFRIVEF:;: L_NC TM NO F'F=RO w f M I "T . (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL-. OF SERVICE F GATURATION '� CRITICAL N/S VOL 7C=]p 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM 1 tfi.f�1a- LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUNI% 3)0 UT H D 0tJND CASTP0UND WESTBOUND LPiNE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV W I I)TH NOV W 1.I)TH ]. R. . 12. 0 R. . 1.. 0 RT. 15. C) R. . 12. C T. . 1 '. C) R. . 12. ci T. 12. 0 T. 1.^_. i) T. T. . 1 T. . 12. o T. . 12, C� 4 L. . 12. 0 L. 1'2. C) L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 1,2. CI L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT S5 1 IOC-) 48C-) 1:';C THRU 155 245 171515 1580 RIGHT 95 670 40 600 TRUCES (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 1 SOUTHBOUNI) 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 91 269 624 612 LEFT 44 610 2 51 0 LEFT TURN CHECK. NORTHBOUND SORTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I hJF'UT VOLUME o^5 1 1 i�C� 48C) 151 ADJUSTED VOL 44 116_ 479 0 CAPAC I TY 0 i► 1'.'- 239 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A 01. 39 F'AF;:SQhIS E-iFR I IVCF EF:HCF"F l�FC I T I CAI_ MOWEMEINJ_F ANAL—YS I S Ec C3 L_E3 A C—_ I CA l WAFtihlEIR L_.C>QVC T FEE O=,:M AF F=:'L— I CANT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL _L I I CRITICAL SUM 159t!;7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 1'?. C) R. . 12. C) RT. 15. C F:. . T. C) R. . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. i� L. . 1.". i) T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o T. 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. c_) T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. �� . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TF'AFF I C VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT" 65. 12_)5 485 13.5 THRU 155 245 1820 162i� RIGHT 95 875 40 67�� TRUCk:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 =y 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8C_) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 174 269 646 628 LEFT 44 670 485 0 LEFT TURN CHECFK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 85 4e5 1=5 ADJUSTED VOL 44 1278 485 i CAPACITY 0 C) 18 467 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OF::: .L1 on F•ink F;E3ONS E;F:;: I NCh-__FEE F=<HOE1= CF: I T I CAL_ MQ'tirEMEN-1- AthIALYS I S EiCL__..Sink CH I CA / WARNEF: L—NC TM AF•L_ChIT W f M I T (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA). DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE FE SATURATION c=' CRITICAL N/S VOL 6 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL CS'- CRITICAL SUM 145-4 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ErASTROUNI) WESTIOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH J. R. . 1'7.. (-� R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. C) R. . 12. C) 2 T. . 1 '. ii R. . 1 C) T. . 1�'. C) T. T. . 12. T. . 1.2. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 L. . L. . 12. Q L. . 12. i> T. . 12.. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. c.) 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 8 1�. i-i 485, THRU 155 245 18W 162.0 RIGHT 95 875 40 670 TRUCk:S (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 88 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 91 269 646 628 LEFT 44 670 254 U LEFT TURN CHECf:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 85 12'51 485 1 ADJUSTED VOL 44 1278 485 0 CAPACITY i) i 18 236 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK �[ 7 ' F="*'nt F<E3 C)PQ E3 E-4 FR I P4(--F<F=FR"C3 F=F= F--F=;� I _Y_ I L_ M C) M E:PA-I- 411j M dc�L_N"S; I c-3 ' Y-::c C:)L_!E-3 C� I C�dc% W onk FzZ M F=FR I—(D PQ c-; _r F=_F:R M e1A L__r I (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE 1= SATURATION -1. 1 �� CRITICAL N/S VOL �3�_-.c5�' � CRITICAL E/W VOL 1 AL 1 CRITICAL SUM 1 4=9�� ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEsTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. ' 12' 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T' ' 12' 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T' ' 12' 0 3 L' ' 12' 0 T. . 12' 0 T. ' 12. 0 T. . 12' 0 4 ' ' ' ' . ' ' L. ' 12' 0 L' . 12. 0 T. . 12' 0 5 . . ' . . ' ' L. . 12. 0 . . . . ' . ' L' . 12. 0 6 ' . . ' . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . ' ' . . . . . ^ ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 85 1195 485 135 THRU 155 245 1810 1620 RIGHT 95 875 40 665 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 174 269 643 628 LEFT 44 665 485 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 85 1195 485 135 ADJUSTED VOL 44 1267 485 0 CAPACITY 0 0 15 470 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK | �� | �A Planning Commission Action on November 17 1987 A MOTION WAS MADE BY SILVA, SECOND BY PIERCE, TO APPROVE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 87-2C TO PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE DESIGNATION, APPROVE WITH FINDINGS ZONE CHANGE NO. 87-13 TO ALLOW 15 ACRES OF COMMERCIAL AND 50 ACRES OF MIXED RESIDENTIAL NOT TO EXCEED 600 UNITS (12 UNITS/ACRE) AS MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Silva, Summerell, Higgins, Pierce, Leipzig, Livengood NOES: Schumacher, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None A MOTION WAS MADE BY PIERCE, SECOND BY SILVA, TO CONTINUE MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN TO THE DECEMBER 1, 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Silva, Schumacher, Higgins, Pierce, Leipzig, Livengood, Summerell NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None This motion was in response to nine revisions requested by the Planning Commission which were incorporated into the Specific Plan for the December 1st public hearing. The Commission suggested that the following revisions be made to the specific plan: 1. Number of residential units not to exceed 600 units and shall be distributed among several product types. 2. Street connections be provided between Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue that would not encourage through traffic. 3. Airport operation to cease within 60 days after approval of the first entitlement. 4. Master Plan changed to read "Conceptual Master Plan". 5. Circulation: The eastern side of Roosevelt Lane to be improved and dedicated and shall not be a through street to Warner. 6. Developer shall pay one-fourth of the cost of a traffic signal at Bolsa Chica and at Pearce if Pearce is proposed to access the project site. 7. Density bonuses within individual product types may be granted, however the total number of units for the entire project shall not exceed 600. 8. Commercial use setbacks: building heights not to exceed 30 feet within 70 feet of property, no buildings or service drives within 20 feet of property line. A minimum of a 20 foot landscape and setback shall be provided between the commercial and existing residential area. Front setback line for proposed project - 50 feet from Warner Avenue. 9. Area set aside on western edge of Gibbs Park for park parking. RCA - 2/1/88 -2- (9727d) .. wawa •myv-`�c�sasw Legal Notice r ON } Cityof Huntington Beach � Office of the City Clerk q _ p P. O. Box 190 ! c H Huntington Beach,CA 92648 cr Fool s9i AA 141 � Ap 93'9-330-87��lESTFIELO HUNTINGTON CO. �a " 04-007 '' •%WESTFIELD DEV .CORP f' jpr 17802 SKY PARK C,IR C104., . 4�`•/f� 4 � IRVIHE rI;CA 92714 ! J 10, , ,� J"_ FIRST CLASS MAIL ,,.•,i, HUNTINGTON!EACH 7` , Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk EE && A � P. 0. Box 190 l.9 t Huntington Beach,CA 92648 a M4 7;97 i 80023 . . 146-656-04 METERSr SHIRLEY., J, ', ) i A.•t 04r007. '1'; 7567 SUVA ST, Ifi ' • ; DOWNEY,. CA • "Iff • I. FIRST CLASS MAIL HUNTNGTON{EACH Legal Notice _ T City of Huntington Beach P R E J"�cr Office of the City Clerk ~ � P. O. Box 190 - _ F t,�.A C ? ` = JAN 2 � -R..3 = �= '� S S ,� ' # Huntington Beach,CA 926�� i ;� _ 1 , V ' [ i.► .r , 1j 8001397 . ,y4 939-331-01 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO w h v 04-007 /WESTFIELD DEV CORP �fee*� ♦ i\� 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104 IRVINE, CA 92714 ` FIN FIRST CLASS MAIL �nw.mkNACH Legal Notice �N TON City of Huntington Beach R �. a� 9 �: _.-- •� ":-•.:_.,.--r Office of the City Clerk JAN 9 2 P. O. Box 190 r �• t,�.f, p A ~ Huntington Beach,CA 92648 A FQo�135� 939-331-aS"WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO p�0 � 04_00�•� XWESTFIELD DEV CORP 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104 IRVINE P CA 92714 Huwm+cloa MACM FIRST CLASS MAIL Planning Commission Action on December 1. 1987 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY HIGGINS, TO APPROVE ZONE CHANGE NO. 87-13 - WITH REVISIONS TO MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Silva, Higgins, Pierce, Summerell, Livengood NOES: Schumacher, Leipzig ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Findings for Approval - Zone Change No. 87-13: 1. The proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation as recommended for amendment by the Planning Commission. 2. With the development constraints, mitigation measures and entitlement process which are established in the specific plan, the proposed zone change will be compatible with adjacent properties. 3. Phasing of the project will assure that the capacities of the City and County water, sewer, and storm drain systems are adequate or will be adequate to accommodate the proposed increase in density as well as all other planned land uses in the area. 4. With the proposed mitigation measures the proposed increase in density will not have a significant adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities, school enrollments, and recreational resources. 5. The character of the surrounding area is not adversely impacted nor is the overall intent of the general plan sacrificed. Planning Commission Action on December 15. 1987 A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECOND BY PIERCE, TO ACCEPT THE REVISED MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN AND FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Silva, Schumacher, Higgins, Pierce, Leipzig, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: Summerell ABSTAIN:None Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Land Use Element No. 87-2C for a change in land use designation from Low Density Residential to Planned Community. Staff also recommends approval with findings of Zone Change No. 87-13 for the adoption of the Meadowlark Specific Plan, which would allow 15 acres of commercial and 50 acres of mixed residential, not to exceed 600 units (an overall average of 12 units per acre). F- 1 RCA - 2/1/88 -3- (9727d) ANALYSIS- Transmitted for action is a request by the Nerio Family to redesignate a 65—acre site (most of the existing Meadowlark Airport), located on the north side of Warner Avenue, the south side of Heil Avenue and 600 feet east of the northeast corner of Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue, from Low Density to Planned Community implemented by a Specific Plan that will allow 15 acres of commercial and 50 acres of residential (maximum 600 units). The application for general plan amendment was initially submitted in January of 1986. At that time, staff required that the applicant supply numerous special studies to address important issues such as sewage, traffic, archaeology and economics. Those studies took more than a year for the applicant's consultants to complete. After the requested studies had been submitted, staff incorporated them into the EIR and transmitted it to the Planning Commission in May of 1987. As a result of the public hearing process, the EIR as well as the applicant's request and staff recommendation have changed considerably. The attached chronology of events explains the process and changes that the project has progressed through. As indicated in the chronology of events, the major issues considered by staff and the Planning Commission were: traffic/circulation, sewer and general compatibility. In order to address those issues, a Specific plan was developed which will serve as the implementing zoning for the project. The Specific Plan requires a conceptual master plan be approved at the time of first entitlement, requires phasing in conjunction with infrastructure availability, establishes circulation parameters, indentifies a maximum number of residential units divided into specific density ranges and requires perimeter buffering to enhance compatibility. The following is a summary of the major issues as addressed by the Specific Plan and EIR. Traffic and Circulation The original traffic study was revised several times and expanded to include consideration of potential traffic generated by the development proposed for the Bolsa Chica. Traffic is expected to increase in that area with or without the Meadowlark project or the Bolsa Chica project. For the proposed project and the alternatives, the retail commercial portion generated the majority of traffic associated with development on the site. For example, the maximum development allowed in the Specific Plan will generate an estimated 13,200 average daily trips 9000 of which are attributed to the retail commercial center. The proposed project will measurably reduce the long—term level of service (LOS) on both Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. For example, the LOS on Warner will go from C to D and on Bolsa Chica (Heil to Warner) from B to C. The Specific Plan addresses circulation issues by establishing the following requirements: 1. Limited access to Pearce Street may be permitted, but shall be designed so that trips per day do not exceed 2500. 2. Signalization at the southern and northern perimeters of the site. 3. Internal circulation planned in a circuitous manner to discourage through traffic between Warner and Heil Avenues. 3 F- I ' RCA — 2/1/88 —4— (9727d) Sewer and Water The Specific Plan will require that prior to issuance of building permits within any of the areas designated as a separate phase of development on the phasing plan, clearance shall be obtained from the Orange County Sanitation District and City Water Department stating that such development will not adversely impact the sewer and water systems. Such clearance shall be in the form of a letter to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Community Development. Compatibility The Specific Plan requires that a buffer system be incorporated into the proposed project adjacent to the existing single family development that abutts the subject site on portions of its eastern and western borders. This measure was developed to mitigate the incompatibility of any proposed multi-family development on the subject site and the existing single family. In addition to the buffer system, the Specific Plan also addresses the type and distribution of residential product types. The Specific Plan requires three product types including a minimum of 18 acres of single family detached units. The following table appears in the Specific Plan to establish the product types. Acres Type of Unit Density Minimum Detached of 18 Single Family 7/acre Maximum Multi Family 12/acre of 20 Medium Density Maximum Multi Family 20/acre of 12 Medium-high density Total 50 acres ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The request is accompanied by Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 87-2. Comments from agencies notified are included in the appendix to the report and can also be found in the Planning Commission staff report of September 29, 1987. Because the airport impacts an area that is greater than 300 feet, property owners within a 1000 foot radius were notified and comments were received. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. I RCA - 2/l/88 -5- (9727d) i ALTERNATIVE ACTION• The City Council may deny Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2C and Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2 and deny Zone Change No: 87-13 with the following findings: 1. The proposed zone change would result in a land use which would not be compatible with surrounding properties. 2. There is not existing sewer capacity to support the proposed uses and densities. 3. The proposed increase in density will have an adverse impact on traffic volumes and road capacities. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area Map 2. Project Chronology 3. Resolution Adopting Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2C 4. Ordinance for Zone Change No. 87-13 5. Meadowlark Specific Plan 6. Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2 7. Addendums to the EIR 8. Traffic Analysis and Revisions DLB:MA:HS:DTB:gbm F- I RCA - 2/1/88 -6- (9727d) PUffLIC NOTICE _A RIC NOTTIr PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE O ', IC HEARING (LAND USE ELEMENT 87-2C - ZONE,CHANQE 87-13 & EIR 87-2 (MEADOWLARK ORT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council willratthe lic hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California,on the date anime indicat It lye and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE:February 1, 1988,Monday �Ot'ED gY CITY COUNCIL OSCIL TIME:7:00 P.M. "`�_�_-• � /• 19c� SUBJECT:Land Use Element Amendment 87-2c,Zone Change 87-13 and Environmental Im act Report 87-2 APPLICANT:Dick Norio LERg LOCATION:Approximately 600 feet north east of the Intersection of Bolsa Chico Street and Warner Avenue. CITY PROPOSAL:Amend the General Plan by redesignating the 65 acre Meadowlark Airport from Low Density Residential to Planned Community with a concurrent zone change from MH(Mobilehome,maximum nine units per acre)to Meadowlark Specific Plan which would allow 15 acres of retail commercial and 50 acres of mixed residential not to exceed 600 units(an average of 12 units per acre). ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:Environmental Impact Report No.87-2 assessing the environmental impact of the project will also be considered by the City Council. ON FILE:Community Development - -ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are Invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above.All applications,exhibits,and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, California,for Inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL,By:Allcls M.Wentworth,City Clerk,Phone:(714)536-5405 Dated 1/20/88 Published Huntington Beach Independent January 28, 1988 014-639 2.1 i W y { EXHIBIT I L.U,E, 87-2c AREA MAP huntington beach planting division ��rz _ef�>.P_ Arm CVN vhdt* '�.1. 2 .1 —Ti J / �iMuwYPM1 / �RY.4 \ rMRb. EXHIBIT I L, U. E, 87-2c AREA MAP huntington beach planning division ATTACHMENToZ Project Chronology January 1986 The application requesting a general plan redesignation and zone change for the 65-acre Meadowlark Airport was submitted in January of 1986. Following the application submittal, staff, Dick Nerio (representing the Nerio Family) and Dick Harlow (the official representative and consultant to Dick Nerio) meet to discuss what procedures would be established in response to the request. The director of Development Services directed staff to prepare the environmental impact report (EIR) and also required the applicant to provide specific, necessary, studies which were also significant components of the EIR. The specific studies included: the traffic analysis, market analysis, archaeological assessment, sewer assessment and preliminary soils analysis. These studies were completed in early 1987 which allowed staff to complete the EIR and bring it to the Planning Commission for the first study session in May 1987 (copies of all Planning Commission staff reports are included as attachments to this RCA). Ma 1 87 The request brought to the Planning Commission study session in May 19, 1987 was as follows: Redesignate 65 acres located on the north side of Warner Avenue, south side of Heil Avenue and 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street from Low Density Residential to 30 acres of Medium Density Residential (450 units), 15 acres of Medium High Density (375 units, 5 acres of Senior Citizen Residential (250 units). The total number of residential units equaled 1075, and 15 acres of Commercial (196,020 gross square feet). The proposed number of units included density bonuses. At that time Land Use Element 87-2 (LUE) addressed two amendment requests; Meadowlark (Area 2.1) and OCTD (Area 2.2). OCTD was adopted first as LUE 87-2A. A concurrent LUE for A.C. Marion was adopted as LUE 87-2B, and Meadowlark as LUE 87-2C. The Meadowlark analysis contained an analysis of six land use scenarios or alternatives which were later expanded to seven. The issues raised at the May studying session included: 1. Compatibility: A mixed residential development would be compatible with some of the existing residential uses adjacent to Meadowlark but not compatible with existing single-family on both the west and east side of the subject site. 2. Traffic: The proposed residential and commercial developments would contribute to increased traffic in the area surrounding the site. 3. Sewage: The site currently uses a septic tank, therefore, the proposed development would require a sewer system that would discharge into the County Sanitation District No. 11 service area and the Slater Pump Station. The Slater Pump Station is at capacity. 4. Water: Questions arose regarding the Water Department's ability to adequately serve the site if and when it was totally developed. i 5. Noise: Existing residential developments would be subject to noise levels of 70 and 65 Ldn, especially those residences along Heil Avenue, just north of the site. The Planning Commission directed staff to provide additional information, at the public hearing, regarding traffic, sewage, water, market analysis and compatibility. A public hearing was scheduled for June 2, 1987. June 1987 In addition to responding to the Commission's request for additional data, staff also presented a seventh land use alternative to those analyzed in the EIR. Alternative No. 7 presented a combination of 50 acres of low density residential and 15 acres of commercial. This additional alternative was developed in response to the Commission's concern regarding the significant impacts, of the applicant's request on traffic and the sewer system from the 1075 dwelling units. At this hearing, there were also unresolved questions regarding future Water Department services to the site, the feasibility/viability of a commercial center in that area and the proposed multi-family impact on existing single-family residences adjacent to the Airport. The testimony at the public hearing could be divided into two groups: those opposed to closing the airport and those opposed to the proposed multi-family development on the residential portion of the site. Although staff proposed phasing the development to coincide with the availability of water and sewer service, the Commission was also very concerned about the density of the proposed residential portion of the development and related impacts. In response to the public and Planning Commission's concern the applicant requested a continuation of the hearing until July 28, 1987. July 1987 On July 28th, staff requested a continuation of the item with a request of the Planning Commission to direct staff to prepare a specific plan for the subject site concurrent with the General Plan Amendment. It was also at this time that the EIR was amended to separate the subject site (Meadowlark) from the original report and establish Land Use element Amendment 87-2C. Staff also reconsidered its previous recommendation for the proposed project which was approval of the requested general plan amendment and zone change. The reconsideration concluded that infrastructure deficiencies were so great as to preclude any redesignation other than 15 acres along Warner Avenue to commercial. This recommendation was in conflict with staff's earlier conclusion as described in the environmental impact report. That earlier conclusion was that Meadowlark Airport offered the opportunity for a variety of housing product types as well as retail commercial potential. Any concerns regarding infrastructure capability could be resolved through phasing of the project. The revised approach staff proposed was similar to the approach used in the Seabridge project at Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue. The Planned Community land use designation would permit a range of residential densities, as well as retail development. A specific plan would then identify all of the constraints and mitigation measures to be applied to the site, but would not identify the exact location of land uses. Those locations and land uses would be established through the conditional use permit process. Project Chronology A-2 (9729d) i The Planning Commission supported staff's reconsideration and directed staff to prepare a specific plan to be assessed at the next public hearing. In prior hearings, staff identified the major issues which surfaced in response to the applicant's proposal to close the airport and develop the site with residential and commercial use. Those issues were as follows: 1. The closure of the airport would negatively impact general aviation in the country, reducing available tie-down spaces. 2. Due to normal growth and development of the Bolsa Chica, traffic volumes on the adjacent arterials are expected to increase greatly over the next ten years. The additional traffic which would be generated by the project may increase traffic volumes measurably. 3. The residents on Pearce Drive are concerned that development of the site will excessively increase traffic on Pearce Drive. 4. The proposed residential densities are higher than most of the surrounding residential land uses adjacent to the site. 5. Sewer capacity at the present time is not sufficient to meet the needs of any densities which exceed the existing Low Density Residential designation. 6. At the present time, it is undetermined whether sufficient future water capacity exists to service the proposed development. 7. The site may be subject to contamination by hazardous substances and leakage of methane gas. 8. The site has been identified as a possible archaeological site. At the July 28, 1987 hearing, the Planning Commission continued the hearing until September 22, 1987 (the public hearing was rescheduled to a special public hearing on the 29th) and directed staff to address these issues by completing the following tasks: 1. Prepare a Feasibility Study for City acquisition and operation of the airport. 2. Prepare a Specific Plan which would include a maximum of 400 units (7 units per acre) and approximately 10 to 15 acres of Commercial. 3. Prepare a Specific Plan which would include 400 to 750 units, approximately 10 to 15 acres of Commercial, and senior citizen housing either on-site or off-site. Subsequent to the hearing, the applicant withdrew his request for senior citizen housing. September 1987 Staff responded to the direction of the Planning Commission by completing the following items for the public hearing on September 29, 1987. Project Chronology A-3 (9729d) 1. Meadowlark Airport Feasibility Analysis 2. Traffic Study Addendum by Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. 3. Draft Meadowlark Specific Plan Option A - 750 residential units and 15 acres of commercial. Option B - 600 residential units and 15 acres of commercial. Option C - 400 residential units and 15 acres of commercial. 4. Alternative Specific Plan Concepts 5. "Qualified" zoning restrictions to be considered as an alternative to a specific plan. All of the above-are included in the September 29th staff report attached to the RCA. At the September public hearing, the majority of individuals who testified requested the Planning Commission to recommend to the City Council the immediate closure of Meadowlark Airport. Their secondary concern was the traffic that would be generated by the proposed development. In response to public testimony and staff's report regarding the feasibility of the City owning and operating Meadowlark Airport, the Planning Commission passed a motion recommending that the City Council not pursue any consideration of purchasing and operating a municipal airport at Meadowlark. The results of a revised traffic study were also presented (that included estimated Bolsa Chica traffic) with the conclusion that, in the near term, assuming the completion of the commercial center, the three alternative land uses that had been most recently assessed (all containing 15 acres of commercial with either 750,600 or 400 dwelling units) would have similar impacts on the intersections adjacent to or near the airport. A new issue that surfaced at this meeting/public hearing was the lack of a site plan identifying the general location of the proposed residential portion of the development and the relation of those proposed units to existing residential developments adjacent to the airport. The applicant, in response to the site plan request, requested a continuance of the hearing until November to prepare a conceptual site plan. The Environmental Impact Report 87-2C was found adequate by the Planning Commission. November 1987 Staff's recommended action presented at the November 17th public hearing was as follows: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of General Plan land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2C for a change in land use designation from Low Density Residential to Planned Community. Staff also recommends approval with findings of Zone Change No. 87-13 for the adoption of the Meadowlark Specific Plan, which would allow 15 acres of commercial and 50 acres of mixed residential, not to exceed 600 units (an average of 12 units per acre). Project Chronology A-4 (9729d) The above recommendation was supported by a staff report that included, in addition to the applicant's conceptual site plan containing 750 units, a site plan prepared by staff that contained a maximum of 600 dwelling units. The report also contained further refinement of the proposed buffer areas separating existing residential adjacent to the airport from any proposed medium density (multi-family) residential units proposed for the site and the specific plan as reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's office. Testimony received at this public hearing focused on support of the applicant's proposal to develop, in addition to the retail commercial, 750 dwelling units on the airport site. The applicant, however, changed their request, reducing the residential portion to 600 units. The Planning Commission approved the general plan Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2C changing the land use designation on the Meadowlark Airport site to Planned Community containing 50 acres of residential development with a maximum of 600 units and 15 acres of retail commercial. The Commission continued the zone change component of the request in order to provide additional refinement to the Meadowlark Specific Plan. Staff was directed to bring the revised Meadowlark Specific Plan back to the Commission on December 1, 1987. December 1987 The Meadowlark Specific Plan was augmented in response to concerns raised by the Planning Commission at the November 17 public hearing regarding the need to have more specific guidelines in the plan focusing on issues related to circulation, parking, alternative development scenarios specifying residential product types, buffers, setbacks and park dedication. Also, within Section N. Development Standards, three alternative development scenarios were presented. Staff requested that the Commission choose one of those scenarios to be included in the final version of the Specific Plan. The Commission chose one of the alternatives which divided the residential portion of the proposed development into three segments including: a minimum of 18 acres of low density (7 DU/ac), a maximum of 20 acres of medium density (12 DU/ac) and a maximum of 12 acres of medium-high density (20 DU/ac). At this time, it was also discussed that staff tentatively scheduled a public hearing of the Meadowlark GPA, zone change, EIR before the City Council at their second meeting in January 1988. There were also further revisions to the Specific Plan which staff was directed to prepare and return to the Planning Commission at their December 15, 1987 meeting. December 15, 1987 Brought before them as an informational item (non-public hearing) was a further revised Meadowlark Specific Plan including deletions of sections no longer necessary within the context of the revised Specific Plan. The Commission found some typographical errors and the deletion of a sentence they wanted re-included in the Specific Plan. Staff will make the corrections and take the corrected Specific Plan back to the Commission on January 5, 1988 for their review of the latest revisions. Project Chronology A-5 (9729d) �s Attachment . � MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS A. PURPOSE B. SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT D. APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1. Conditional Use Permit 2. Conceptual Master Plan 3. Statement Required 4. Phasing Plan for Development E. SEWER AND WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY F. CIRCULATION 1. Perimeter Streets 2. Internal Circulation G. TRAFFIC CONTROL H. TRANSIT FACILITIES I. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES J. GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMICITY K. ARCHAEOLOGY L. PERIMETER BUFFERS M. ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT AREAS N. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS O. HOMEOWNERS OR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION P. APPROVAL PERIOD MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN A. PURPOSE - On the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adopted an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. This amendment designated approximately 65 acres of land located approx- imately 600 ft. north and east of the intersection of Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue as a Planned Community. The General Plan Document, Land Use Element Amendment 87-2C, states that the Planned Community designation is to be imple- mented through adoption of a Specific Plan. The following policies were adopted by the City Council to provide direction for preparation of a Specific Plan: 1. The 15 acre retail center shall be located on Warner Avenue extending between Roosevelt Street and the residential project to the east. 2. The total number of residential units, including any proposed affordable units, to be constructed on the 50 acre portion of the property due north of the commercial portion, shall not exceed 600 units and shall be distributed among several product types. 3. A buffer shall be provided between the existing single family homes and any attached residential units which are developed at greater than 7 units per acre. 4. An internal traffic circulation plan shall be provided that will: a. Provide street connections between Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue that would not encourage non-project related through traffic. b. Limit the amount of traffic on Pearce Street to 2500 average daily trips. c. Locate vehicular access points to Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue so as to minimize traffic conflicts. 5. Provide a phased development plan which coincides with the available capacity in the sewer and water systems. Meadowlark Specific Plan -1- (0631D) a 6. Within 60 days of City approval of the first entitlement for development, the airport operation will cease. 7. This Specific Plan enacted through Zone Change No. 87-13 will be in effect until a subsequent zone change is adopted. The Planning Commission shall conduct an annual review of the Specific Plan until such time as a master plan is approved for the site. The Meadowlark Specific Plan is designed to meet the planning requirements of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. It is intended to serve as a general set of conditions and regulations that will promote the orderly development of the pro- perty and provide direction for preparing a plan for development while providing sufficient flexibility to permit design creativity. B. SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES - The Meadowlark Specific Plan encompasses that area as delineated on the Exhibit 1. 2. Legal Description - The Meadowlark Specific Plan includes the real property described as follows: Parcel 1 in the City of Huntington Beach as per map filed in Book 146, Page 21 I of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County; and Parcels 24, 25 and 26 in the City of Huntington Beach, as per map filed in Book 146, Page 24 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT See Environmental Impact Report 87-2 D. APPLICATION PROCEDURE - Any request for a development proposal shall be accompanied by an application for a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map. Such applications shall include preliminary site plans, grading plans, floor and elevation plans and a statement of statistics. All plans shall be submitted con- currently and shall meet the following requirements. 3 Meadowlark Specific Plan -2- (0631D) Fir __ — --- _ -- -- --- -_ VENT JRI ^� O MARSIRALL ' N �— V 4<i Gwt SrCC m V ' . g a i CAL'E14TE YOOLECOFF � 50 LANDSCAPE SETBACK ( IF ATTACHED UNITS) , . I I ►!EIL TT� . J' ---T • 4 Semmes. R i CR c q 3 BUFFER C F — R ZONE • �. PRESIDENTIAL -- $ 50 AC. I BUFFER ZONE T T. ,,✓noon .- ..... - _ Y 1007 CR COMMERCIAL 20' LANDSCAPE 15 AC. SETBACK a lonesome soeuum..Sem 3 1� ;cre • cc — v WARNER ` -�q. ....TE 1 11 50' SETBACK OORADO OR RO R I N 2 2 � J OUNSAR a PENDLE1 0 FUTMu u Exhibit 1 Af!Rk MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN huntington beach planning division 1. Conditional Use Permit - Any proposed development within the specific plan area shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use permit as provided in Article 984 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 2. Conceptual Master Plan - A conceptual master plan for the overall project shall be submitted at the time of the first Conditional Use Permit, the conceptual master plan shall include the following: a_ Perimeter buffer alignment b. Location of pedestrian walkways; c. Circulation pattern of vehicular traffic; d. Use of common open space areas; e. Layout showing proposed sewage and water facilities. 3. Statement Required - A detailed statement shall also be included containing the following information: a. Distance from the property to any known geological hazard; b. Existence of known contamination from hazardous materials on-site; c. Phase I results and Phase II proposals for the Archeological Assessment of the Meadowlark Airport; d. Gross area of product type within the total project area boundary. e. Number and type of units and number of bedrooms; f. Total number of units and number of units and bedrooms per gross acre; g. Schedule and sequence of development if proposed in phases. 4. Phasing Plan for Development A plan identifying phased development of the residential and commercial area shall be submitted in conjunction with the submittal of the conceptual master plan and any conditional use permits. Meadowlark Specific Plan -4- (0631 D) E. SEWER AND WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY Prior to issuance of building permits within any of the area designated as a separate phase of development on the phasing plan, clearance shall be obtained from the Orange County Sanitation District and City Water Department stating that such development will not adversely impact the sewer and water systems. Such clearance shall be in the form of a letter to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Community Development. F. CIRCULATION The conceptual master plan shall establish a plan concurrent with the issuance of the first entitlement. This conceptual master plan will establish the general alignment of Pearce Street if it connects into the new development, the connector street alignment and the internal circulation pattern of the development. Standards for streets and drives shall be as follows: 1. Perimeter Streets - The street right-of-way for Warner Avenue, Heil Avenue, and Pearce Street shall be dedicated as public streets and fully improved to city standards. The eastern side of Roosevelt Lane (approximately 500 linear feet south of Pearce Street) shall be fully dedicated and fully improved to City standards, if needed. 2. Internal Circulation - Circulation within the Specific Plan Area shall be such that a connection between Heil Avenue with Warner Avenue shall be provided. Project access points shall be at Warner Avenue/Leslie Lane and Heil Avenue/ Del Mar Lane. Any access to Pearce Street shall be such that traffic on Pearce Street does not exceed 2500 average daily trips. Roosevelt Lane shall not be a through street to Warner Avenue. The points of intersection with Warner Avenue, Heil Avenue, Pearce Street and Roosevelt Street shall generally conform to or accomplish the objectives identified in Exhibit "1". Meadowlark Specific Plan -5- (0631D) G. TRAFFIC CONTROL - The Planning Commission, upon recommendation of the Department of Public Works, shall determine the need for traffic control devices (i.e., traffic signals). Such determination shall include the appropriate time of installation. The developer shall pay the entire cost of installing traffic signals at Heil Avenue/Del Mar Lane, and Warner Avenue/Leslie Lane, at the entrances to the development. If the proposed project requires access to Bolsa Chica Street from Pearce Street then the developer shall pay one-fourth of the cost of a traffic signal at Bolsa Chica and Pearce. The developer shall provide for the future installation of any such improvements prior to issuance of building permits. H. TRANSIT FACILITIES - Bus turnouts and bus shelters shall be provided at locations designated by the Department of Public Works and Orange County Transit District. The design of such shelters and turnouts shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Orange County Transit District. I. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Ridesharine The Orange County Transit District has a rideshare program, called "Commuter Network," which matches origins and destinations of commuters by computer. The developer shall explore the feasibility of designing a program for the site prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Pedestrian Access The project shall include pedestrian accessways from the interior of the site to the existing bus stops on the area streets and to the shopping center. The accessways shall be paved, lighted and handicapped accessible. 3. Child Care Facilities The provision of neighborhood child care facilities are encouraged in the project in order to reduce the frequency and length of trips related to child care responsibilities. 7 Meadowlark Specific Plan -6- (0631D) J. GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMICITY - The following geology, soils and seismicity measures shall be employed prior to the issuance of building permits: 1. Submittal of a structural engineering study evaluating proposed foundation designs with respect to ground shaking and liquification hazards on the property. The study shall be subject to the review and approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. Foundations and structural components of the buildings shall be designed according to recom- mendations contained within the structural engineering study. 2. Submittal of a soils study detailing grading and site preparation recom- mendations. This study shall be subject to the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. Grading and site preparation shall be accomplished in accordance with recommendations presented in the soils study. 3. Submittal of a soils analysis identifying the absence or presence of methane gas and/or contamination by hazardous materials. If contamination is found, all affected areas must be cleaned up to the satisfaction of the City and other I appropriate agencies. If methane gas is present, a mitigation plan must be submitted to and approved by the City and other appropriate agencies. K. ARCHAELOGY Prior to the issuance of entitlements, an archaeological analysis of three areas on the Meadowlark Airport, identified in the existing archaeological assessment (see Exhibit 2) shall be conducted. The analysis will include some excavations to determine the existence of historical 19th century habitation and American Indian habitation, pre-19th century. g Meadowlark Specific Plan -7- (0631D) 0 200 lest Z 0 50 meters • c m cc W a O 2 A. AREA 4... AREA 3 -` AIRPLANE PARKING AREA 2 06..-A.. AREA 1 I -.420 meter grid a J�F O 0�' o� WARNER AVENUE MEADOWLARK: AREAS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONCERN huntington beach planning division EXHIBIT 2 L. PERIMETER BUFFERS A landscaped perimeter buffer shall be provided between existing off—site single family units and any development related multi family units pursuant to section N, Development Standards, see number 3 for specific standards. M. ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT AREAS The configuration of the property for which this Specific Plan is prepared is such that there are two (2) district areas. These areas are delineated on the Specific Plan Map shown on Exhibit 1. A description of Development standards for these areas are included in the following section. N. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Proposed development within the Meadowlark Specific Plan shall comply with the following standards: I. Uses Permitted and Related Densities — The following uses are permitted within the specific plan area: a. Area A — Commercial This area must comply with the requirements and standards set forth in the C4 District (excluding hotels and motels). b. Area B — Residential The conceptual master plan and cumulative conditional use permits shall use the following scenario as a guide in describing the type and distribution of residential product types. Three product types not exceeding 600 units shall be provided: Acres Type of Unit Density Minimum Detached of 18 Single Family 7/acre Maximum Multi Family 12/acre of 20 Medium Density Maximum Multi Family 20/acre of 12 Medium—high density Total 50 acres Meadowlark Specific Plan —9— (0631D) Density bonuses within individual product types may be granted, however the total number of units for the entire project shall not exceed 600. Bedrooms/Unit The maximum number of bedrooms (see Section 9080.18 of the City Code for the definition of a bedroom) per acre will be established by standards set forth in Article 915, Planned Residential Developments, Section 9150.4 of the City Code: 9150.4 Maximum density. Maximum density shall be as shown in the following chart. For the purpose of calculating density, acreage shall include area to the centerline of abutting street right—of—way, but not to exceed 7.5 percent of the net area. Maximum Units Maximum Bedrooms District per acre per acre Single Family 7 20 Detached Multi Family 12 30 Medium Density i Multi Family 20 40 Medium—High Density 2. Parkin Within the development, parking will be allotted according to Article 915 of the City Code, Planned Residential Developments Parking standards (9150.17). These conditions will include tandum parking for single family residences. Also, any residential unit that has four or more bedrooms will require .5 parking spaces per bedroom in excess of three bedrooms. Off—street and driveway parking may count towards additional parking requirement. Meadowlark Specific Plan —10— (0631 D) 3. Perimeter Buffers a. Adjacent to existing off-site single family development a minimum one hundred (100) foot wide landscaped perimeter buffer will be required, of which 50 percent of that width may be driveway or drive aisle (excluding open or enclosed parking), or 75 percent of which may include attached low density residential units of 100 percent of which may include detached single family residential units. In add cases, the landscaped area shall be the outer portion of the buffer area. If structures are proposed within the buffer area no structure may exceed a height of 25 feet. 4. Setbacks a. If attached structures are proposed along Heil Avenue, a 50 foot land- scaped setback shall be provided. Single family detached units shall only be subject to the normal setbacks established by the City Ordinance Code. b. Commercial uses must be set back from residential areas in order to minimize light and noise impacts. Commercial setbacks shall be conditioned according to Article 922, Commercial District C-4 standards with the exception of the eastern perimeter of the proposed commercial center (between the existing Fernhill residential development and the subject site) where building heights shall not exceed 30 feet within 70 feet of the property, and no buildings or service drives shall be constructed within 20 feet of the property line. This 20 foot setback area shall be limited exclusively to landscaping. c. A 20 foot landscape setback on either side of the collector street shall also be required for the section of the street bi-secting the commercial center. d. The front setback line for the proposed project shall be 50 feet from Warner Avenue consistent with the setbacks depicted in the City's District Maps. Meadowlark Specific Plan -11- (0631D) 5. Landscaping — The purpose of this is to insure a more pleasant living environment through the use of plants and decorative design elements. a. All setback areas fronting on or visible from an adjacent public street, and all recreation, leisure and open areas shall be landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner. b. All landscaped buffer areas shall be landscaped in accordance with an approved landscape plan. The preliminary landscape plan implementing this requirement shall be submitted along with the application for a Conditional Use Permit(s) and/or Tentative Tract Map(s). The final landscape plan shall plan shall be approved by the Department of Community Development. c. Intensified landscaping may be required adjacent to the commercial portions of the proposed project. 6. All requirements set forth in this Specific Plan shall apply. When a conflict exists between this Specific Plan and the requirements of Division 9, the most restrictive requirement shall apply. O. PARK DEDICATION Park dedication for the proposed project could be used for a greenbelt that would provide access through the development to Gibbs Parks and/or as an area on the western edge of the Park that would be set aside for park parking, providing it does not change the character of the Park. Any proposed augmentation of Gibbs Park will be subject to Community Services approval. 13 Meadowlark Specific Plan —12— (0631 D) P. HOMEOWNER'S OR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — Approval of all development proposals shall be subject to submission of a legal instrument or instruments setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recre— ational areas, and community facilities. No such instrument shall be acceptable until approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and by the Director of Community Development as to suitability for the proposed use of the open space areas. If the common open spaces are to be conveyed to a homeowners' association, the developer shall file a declaration of covenants to be submitted with the application for approval, that will govern the association. 1. The homeowners' association shall be established prior to the sale of the last dwelling unit. 2. Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. 3. The open space restrictions shall be permanent. 4. Provisions to prohibit parking upon other than approved and developed parking spaces shall be written into the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for each project. 5. If the development is constructed in increments or phases which require one or more final maps, reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrictions and reciprocal management and maintenance agreements shall be established which will cause a merging of increments as they are completed, and embody one homeowners' association with common areas for the total development. Q. APPROVAL PERIOD — Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 984, Conditional Use Permits, each Conditional Use Permit authorized under this Article shall become null and void within two (2) years unless a final tract map has been recorded with the County Recorders office on any portion of the approved plans within such two (2) year period. Extensions of time may be granted pursuant to the provisions �[ for extending approval of the tentative tract map. �T Meadowlark Specific Plan —13— (0631 D) ATTACHMENT 7 E.I.R. ADDENDUM AND AIRPORT FEASIBILITY STUDY i huntington beach department of community development STAFF � REPORT TO: Planning Commission ' FROM: Community Development DATE: November 17, 1987 SUBJECT: LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 87-2C/ZONE CHANGE NO. 87-13/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 87-2 APPLICANT: Dick Nerio REQUEST: Amend the General Plan by redesignating the 65 acre Meadowlark Airport site from Low Density residential to Planned Community containing 50 acres of mixed residential with a maximum of 750 units and 15 acres of retail commercial. Adopt a Specific Plan to implement the General Plan. LOCATION: Approximately 600 feet north and ,east of the intersection of ,Bolsa Chic& Street and Warner Avenue. 1.0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of General Plan Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2C for a change in land' use designation from Low Density Residential to Planned Community. Staff also recommends approval with findings of Zone Change No. 87-13 for the adoption of the Meadowlark Specific Plan, which would allow 15 acres of commercial and 50 acres of mixed residential, not to exceed 600 units (an average of 12 units per acre) . 2 .0 BACKGROUND: At the public hearing held September 29, 1987, regarding the above request staff provided the following information: 1. he feasibility of purchasing the airport and converting it to ___ a municipal facility. Staff raised serious concerns regarding the City's ability to incur the expense and liability of operating the airport. The majority of people testifying at the public hearing were opposed to the continued operation of the airport. The Commission passed a motion recommending that the Council not pursue any consideration of purchasing and operating a municipal airport at Meadowlark. /0 �'�► _ C - l A44a3C If the property was for sale, Dan Brennan of the City's Property Management Department, has estimated that land costs would be approximately$500,000 per acre or a total of $32,500,000. Essentially, in order to operate a municipal facility that meets FAA and CALTRANS standards, the City would have to redevelop the site, removing and/or demolishing existing structures, build more support and commercial structures and lengthen and widen the runway. In addition to the airport development, private property would have to be purchased, families and business relocated and both Warner and Heil would have to be realigned to accommodate the clear zones discussed previously. Including the land cost, it is estimated that the entire project would cost between 40 and 50 million dollars. The City could, however, create a redevelopment area or an airport authority and through either one of these entities the City would have the legal authority to acquire the site through eminent domain. An airport authority or redevelopment agency could sell bonds to generate funds for airport improvements. If FAA Funds are not Available. Could the City Buy the Ain=? According to Robert Franz, Deputy City Administrator in charge of finance, the City does not have the kind of reserves necessary to purchase the airport site. Assuming that the existing airport structures do not have a measurable value, the purchase price of the airport would be at least $500,000 per acre. At that price, Franz estimates that regardless of how well a refurbished airport functioned, it would not, in the foreseeable future generate enough revenue to recoup the initial cost of land and improvements. VII. Risk Assessment/Liability Staff would recommend that a first step in the formal process of proposing to purchase and operate a municipal airport at Meadowlark would be to have a risk assessment conducted by a consultant to determine the risks and liability impacts to the City associated with a municipal airport. It would also be important to determine the risks and liability associated with an airport with or without safety and clear zones. i 9 Mr. Ferguson also noted that in a recent conversation with FAA Mr. Bloom expressed concerns regarding the ability of the site at Meadowlark to accommodate the necessary improvements to meet FAA standards; this has been illustrated in Figures A and B. If the airport is closed, CALTRANS has a relocation program and will assist the aircraft owners in locating to airports where they can find new tie-down spaces. Airport Land Use Commission While not involved in the approval process, the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) will play a role in reviewing proposed development adjacent to or near the airport. Currently, the City is required to notify the FAA of any proposed development within a 10,000 foot radius of the airport. The State mandated ALUC will also review proposed development within the 10,000 foot radius or planning area. The primary concern of the ALUC is the safety of people in the aircraft and those at risk on the ground, similar to FAA. The difference between the agencies is that FAA is advisory while the State has enpowered the ALUC to delay or deny City permits for development within the 10,000 foot planning area. The purpose is not to prevent development, but in most cases to mitigate situations that may cause aircraft obstructions and create hazards for pilots, passengers and people on the ground. Also, the Airport Land Use Commission (in a letter dated September 21, 1987) supports the continued operations of Meadowlark Airport. IV. Orange County Staff has communicated with Supervisor Harriett Wieder's Office regarding the availability of County funds to assist in a possible City purchase and operation of Meadowlark Airport. As stated in Supervisor Wieder's letter (dated September 14, 1987) "it does not appear that the County will be able to assist Huntington Beach in this matter". V. Los Alamitos The military air station at Los Alamitos is owned by the Navy and leased to the Army. According to Chris Caliendo, staff planner for the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission, the Department of Defense has no intention of operating the air station as a joint use facility (military/civilian) nor does it have any future plans to abandon the facility. In addition, Los Alamitos is a major component in the States Disaster Plan. The base, in the case of a regional or national disaster, will serve as a communications, disaster relief and medical relief center. There is currently a Coast Guard contingent based at the air station which includes a medical unit available for emergency response. VI. Purchasing_the Airport The Nerio Family has stated they do not want to sell the property. Their proposed development plan for the site would result in the family retaining ownership of the land whether they leased or sold any structures that would be built. - O : -7- � ,. (8985cn In order to provide these clear zones, property adjacent to the airport and also south and north of the airport would have to be cleared of existing structures. The clear zone would also include both Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue. Both streets would need to be realigned to accommodate the clear zones. In that case, areas beyond the identified clear zones would have to be devoid of structures to accommodate realignment of Warner and Heil. In a recent telephone conversation with Mr. Bloom, August 18, 1987, he said that considering FAA funding priorities and air traffic conditions in the region, FAA would be reluctant to support a municipal airport at Meadowlark. If the City chooses not to apply for and/or use FAA funds then FAA standards would be advisory and not mandatory. CALTRANS - Aeronautics While the FAA has authority over the pilots and aircraft, CALTRANS has jurisdiction over the airport operation. The City would have to apply to CALTRANS for a permit to operate the airport. The airport would have to meet the FAA requirements, such as a longer and wider runway, to qualify for a permit from CALTRANS. In addition to FAA, CALTRANS has specific requirements that would have to be met before it would issue a permit. They would want the City to zone the area around the airport to control future development and existing conditions. They are concerned about building, antenna and tree heights. An example of an existing condition they are concerned about are several trees in the residential area to the north of the airport on Heil Avenue. The trees located on residential properties exceed the height of the nearby telephone lines and are blocking the view of aircraft on the ground attempting to take off - from seeing approaching aircraft coming in to land. For example, for several seconds one tall pine tree obscured an incoming aircraft from being seen by pilots preparing for take-off and individuals standing next to the runway. CALTRANS would require the City to have the trees cut back below the height of the telephone lines. While CALTRANS does not have grant money available, it does have low interest loans for land acquisition and capital improvements. If the FAA provided 90 percent of the funds to purchase the land, CALTRANS could lend funds to cover the balance. CALTRANS does not have the same requirements as FAA regarding clear zones. They would not require clear zones and would even waiver the 200 foot safety zones at each end of the runway to accommodate a longer runway. According to Duane Ferguson, CALTRANS Aviation consultant, CALTRANS would support the continued operation of Meadowlark and also a conversion to a municipal airport. Mr. Ferguson met with staff at Meadowlark on August 13, 1987 and toured the facility. His initial assessment was that there was enough land on the airport property to accommodate the changes that would bring Meadowlark up to FAA standards. He also stated that the portion of land along Warner, if the airport was improved, would probably accommodate airport related commercial development including a restaurant, motel and aircraft parts and services (some of which currently exist on the airport. . 7 :i- (8985d) L \III � � �% 1111i�1�,, • ��, ��: III � IIII • lull) . 1111111I�.�11/� a ■��! t��t��-11 ;- : �•.1.- , 1 Mn ME - .,��,�� -�,�►I/1 loll MC . ►11111 ..III/� : ::•- =tltttl Itt1►1111'►111 ` '� "��i%ii:•,�• ;� IN � ��, �$��. �1 �� lli�l � ' _ °�:":__ 1 1111111 1 11111 11 �l h�:=�• 1: • �1I1 - � ��_= 1��111 111 1�11111�11 :�Ir:� '.-!: • . 11 111� � Q►�I �� • � ��Illiir •i 11�11 11�\��1 �jj Jaw SO MW 1 111 M:/1111 1111/►� •• / / 1 1 �1� 1 � o ��/1111 111111►� Inn 111 Z : iiiii �iiiiii�� • ��•�� /�m�Inlin _ � iii��. IIIII: I � �I/�� • IIIIIIIIIIt►� 111 .�r'! • ��1 ` �� 1111111� mile 11 __ - iiiiiiiiii - � �.h ,�11111►��ij �1 • `N: •1 s � :a:ssxcz . SEE Z. p /11111 /1 ��_•• � 11 11 I �ir/./.Ii1= D :1 � � :' ilii= �� 1 III i � I � • Hill loll III _ �I EAA According to Robert Bloom of the Los Angeles Division of FAA (Supervisor Standards Section; in a letter dated August 5, 1987), Meadowlark would not be eligible for an FAA grant program at the present time because it is not in the FAA National Plan of Integrated Airport systems. In order to become a candidate for the National Plan, the following criteria would have to be met: 1. SCAG Recommendation which means that SCAG would place Meadowlark in its regional plan, which it has not done, and formally recommended that FAA place Meadowlark in its National Plan. 2. Environmental process - a combined Environmental Impact Statement (EIS - Federal) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR - State) would be required to determine the environmental impacts associated with the City's proposal. Concurrent with the EIS/EIR an independent feasibility study would be required to determine the costs and benefits of the City's proposal. Because of the improvement in related technology since the mid-1970's the environmental process would probably included a new noise study for Meadowlark. Another component of the environmental process would be a comprehensive soils analysis. It is common to find, on Airports like Meadowlark, contamination of the ground surface from years of casual dumping of aircraft fuel and lubricants. If the City were to purchase and operate Meadowlark, they would probably incur a cost to replace a portion of the ground surface. The soils analysis and replacement would also be required by CALTRANS. The FAA would examine the environmental impacts and aviation contributions to l determine if it would be worth it to them to invest in a municipal airport at Meadowlark. They would also compare the City's request against other request for funding nationwide. Meadowlark would be assessed within an FAA priority list. If FAA decided to grant the City money, their grant would cover 90 percent of the land acquisition costs. FAA would also require the City to prepare an airport master plan. The cost for all of these studies would be incurred by the City, an estimate of the costs would be $200,000 or more. The environmental process, cost/benefit analysis, master plan, plus FAA review time would take approximately two years. As stated previously, at the present time the airport does not meet FAA standards. The environmental process would also assess if the airport site could accommodate the necessary improvements. Figure A and B illustrate the existing runway in relation to the site versus a longer and wider runway that would be required to meet FAA standards. Figure B illustrates a design developed by CALTRANS aeronautical staff that would accommodate a longer and wider runway on the existing airport site. In both figures, the clear zones extend beyond the airport property impacting public streets and private property. According to the Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Advisory Circular: Utility Airports. Air Access to National Transportation, the airport design should include a safety zone of 200 feet and a clear zone of 1000 feet at each end of the runway identified in both figures. A clear zone is an area, required for airport hazard removal and approach protection, where no development exists. - (8985d) t Note: Landing Fees charged at Private airports are usually not charged at municipal airports. F C. The City would also receive revenue from fuel sales and business leases at the airport, referred to as fixed base operators. The following businesses are commonly found at airports: - Aircraft sales (also generates retail sales tax) - Flight instruction - Aircraft leasing Aircraft maintenance Additional compatible uses on the airport property (specifically adjacent to Warner Avenue) would be a restaurant, general retail and hotel/motel. These commercial uses would generate lease related revenue plus retail sales tax and transient occupancy tax revenue. Profits Would Meadowlark as a municipal airport generate enough revenue to cover costs? According to the FAA, utility airports generally generate enough revenues to cover costs and/or generate some profit. It is important to note, however, that this statement is based on national averages and not for property that is valued at $500,000 per acre. Rod Murphy, who has managed Fullerton Airport for three years said the Fullerton airport operation should break even within the next two years as they payoff CALTRANS loans, increase hanger/tie down space and increase fees. Fullerton has been a municipal airport for over 20 years. The goal to breaking even or making a profit would be affected by the availability of FAA grant funds. III. Agencies Involved in Airport Funding and Operations In Southern California, there are three governmental entities involved in airport acquisition and operations: the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the California Department of Transportation, Aeronautics division (CALTRANS - Aeronautics). SCAG SCAG has an "Aviation Systems Plan" that assess aviation needs in the region and forecasts future demands. SCAG review and support of a proposed airport, or in this case, the redevelopment of an airport, is necessary before the FAA will consider the proposal. The review period at SCAG is approximately four months. According to Tim Merwin, SCAG staff, SCAG would probably support the City if it proposed to own and operate Meadowlark. Merwin's assessment is based on aviation growth and local demand for tie-down space. While the region as a whole was stable regarding aircraft counts, between 1983 and 1986, there was a three percent increase in general aviation in Orange County. Therefore, based on the growth of general aviation in Orange County, SCAG would probably support retaining an existing facility. The next step in the process would be, assuming SCAG supported the City's 4 proposal, to take the proposal to FAA. 3 -2- _ (8985d) �-� ATTACHMENT 2 1 MEADOWLARK AIRPORT FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS I. A Brief History Meadowlark Airport was incorporated into the City in 1964. By 1970, the City had created a committee to investigate safety conditions at the airport. One outcome of the committee's analysis was the recommendation that "the City take steps to ensure that proper aviation authorities institute proceedings to require compliance with all existing air regulations." In 1972, another committee was formed to investigate the feasibility of a joint purchase of the airport by the City and Orange County. In 1973, the City withdrew its support of the study on Meadowlark, "based on the fact that the airport is not compatible with existing surrounding residential area and would rather find a location more suited for this use." By the late 1970's, as discussed in the EIR, the Airport Board was formed which has contributed to a better relationship between the City, the airport and residential areas surrounding the airport. II. Current Conditions As in 1972, the City is once more investigating the feasibility of owning and operating Meadowlark Airport. If improvements to bring the airport up to FAA standards are feasible, Meadowlark could become a Basic Utility - Type II general aviation airport. This type of airport serves most of the single-engine and small twin-engine airplanes used for personal and business purposes plus air taxi-type twin engine airplanes (example, four passenger commuter plane). Currently, there are approximately 200 aircraft tied down at Meadowlark. According to CALTRANS, that number could be increased by 50 - 100 percent in the space available on the airport site. The increase in tie downs directly relates to revenues generated by uses at an airport. An outline of major revenue sources associated with a municipal airport are as follows: A. Personnel Property Tax - This depends on the value of the aircraft. Currently, the City receives approximately $30 per year in personal property tax revenue per aircraft. An increase in tie downs would increase the amount based on additional aircraft and also newer aircraft that would generate more than $30 per year. Note: A municipal airport would not generate property tax based on land value and improvements because it would be public property. B. Tie Down Fees - based on discussions with the manager of Orange County's other general aviation airport, Fullerton Municipal Airport manager Rod Murphy and CALTRANS consultants, monthly tie down fees would range as follows: Hanger Tie downs $150 to $400 per month General Tie downs $80 to $125 per month ATTACHMENT 4 87-2c ADDENDUM Planning Commission Staff Report July 28, 1997 This Addendum contains supportive material, revised analysis and additional information generated and or received regarding the subject site since the last public hearing on June 2, 1987. The following items are discussed in this Addendum: o Revised Traffic Analysis At the June 2, 1987 study session, the Planning Commission requested staff to have the traffic analysis revised to include potential impacts from the proposed development in the Bolsa Chica. A summary of that revision is included in this addendum and the full revision is an attachment to the Staff Report. o Moody Circle Issues Issues have been raised regarding the existing connection of Moody Circle to Pearce Street, and the possibility of continuing Moody Circle to the south. Item No. 3 addresses those issues. o Airport Water Well In a recent meeting with applicant, a question was raised regarding the feasible future use, by the City's Water Department of an existing water well on the airport site. Item No. 4 reports the results of the Water Departments assessment of the well. o Hazardous Materials It was recently brought to staff's attention that two gas stations on the corner of Bolsa Chica and Warner have underground storage tanks that are leaking gasoline. Item No. 6 assess that situation and its potential impacts to the airport site. o Revised Economic Considerations A member of the Airport Board made staff aware of the fact that the City receives personal property tax revenue on aircraft tied—down (or domiciled) at Meadowlark Airport. The Economic Considerations section of the EIR was revised to include that revenue. I. REVISED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS In the previous traffic impact study conducted for the proposed development of the Meadowlark Airport Site (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. — March, 1987), future traffic volumes at the time the project's commercial phase is completed (near—term — 1991) and at the project's overall completion (long—term — 1996), were developed by factoring 1986 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) by a 3.5 percent annual growth factor. This factor was developed based on average traffic volume growth within the City of Huntington Beach over the past six years. As such, it was assumed to be a reasonable measurement to base anticipated growth in future traffic attributable to general land use intensification, development and through travel in the City. 11 However, in light of the significant size and proximity of the proposed Bolsa Chica development, some measurement of the projected traffic attributable to this project was necessary in addition to the above increase in background traffic. To accomplish this, staff contacted the Signal Landmark planning department and requested their best estimate of the amount of development to be completed by 1991 and 1996, which are the anticipated completion dates for Phase 1 (Commercial) and 2 (Residential) of the proposed Meadowlark project. Parsons, Brincherhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. utilized this data to prepare an analysis which includes traffic from Bolsa Chica development. It is difficult to determine traffic flows at this time because of uncertainties regarding the ultimate street system. PBQ&D did, however, estimate the future levels of service based on normal growth proposed Meadowlark development, anticipated Bolsa Chica traffic and the cummulative impacts of all three scenarios. As expected, future arterial levels of service will decrease greatly, especially on Heil Avenue between Bolsa Chica and Springdale, Warner Avenue and Algonquin and Springdale and Bolsa Chica Street between Edinger and Warner. (See Table 1 of Attachment 5). According to PBQ&D, peak hour intersection levels of service will also decrease. Three key intersections, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue, Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street are analyzed below for the following anticipated scenarios: 1. Existing Conditions 2. Background traffic — assuming normal growth rate at 3.5% 3. Project Traffic 4. Bolsa Chica Traffic S. Cummulative Traffic — based on all the above impacts The analysis assumes that all mitigation measures suggested by PBQ&D are in place. Mitigation measures were proposed where the level of service falls below LOS 'D' because intersections operating at LOS 'D' can be expected to accomodate a high density but stable traffic flow. The other two intersections, Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive and Heil Avenue/Graham Street, which were analyzed in the original report, remained at LOS 'A' throughout PBQ&D's analysis and are not addressed in this revised analysis. Existing Conditions (Table 1) Currently, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue is operating at LOS 'D'. Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue is operating at LOS 'C'. Warner Avenue/Graham Street is operating at LOS 'A'. Near Term Traffic (Table 1) Assuming that proposed arterial improvements (three eastbound and three westbound though lanes on Warner Avenue) are in place, levels of service based on background traffic will decrease. Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue is expected to operate at LOS 'D' although some improvement in capacity over existing conditions is gained with additional through lanes on Warner Avenue. Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street will operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS 'C' or better). (8622d) TABLE 1 Existing and Near Tern Afternoon Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service (With Mitigation) Existing Background Project Bolsa Chica Cuemulative Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue D D 0 0 D Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 8 C C' D D Warner Avenue/Graham Street A B C. C. C. 1 . No mitigation suggested TABLE 2 Long—Tern Peak Hour Intersection 41 Levels of Service (With Mitigation) Background Project Bolsa Chica Cummulative Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue 0 0 E E Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue D D 0 0 'darner Avenue/Graham Street D' D' D D 1 . No mitigation suggested 13 (8622d) -1 1 -3 The addition of peak hour project traffic does not significantly change the levels of service discussed above for the new-term background traffic scenario, provided suggested mitigation measures are in place. With the addition of anticipated Bolsa Chica near-term traffic volumes, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue will operate at LOS 'D', assuming mitigation is in place. Warner Avenue/Graham Street will operate at LOS'C'. When background, project and Bolsa Chica traffic impacts are considered together, levels of service will remain at LOS 'D' for Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue. Again, Warner Avenue/Graham street will operate at LOS 'C'. Long, Term Traffic Impacts (Table 2) Assuming that the suggested mitigation measures are in place, background traffic levels of service will decrease. All the intersections will operate at LOS 'D'. The addition of peak hour project traffic, with mitigation, does not change the levels of service discussed above. All three intersections will operate at LOS 'D'. The addition of Bolsa Chica traffic is expected to require additional measures to mitigate impacts. Assuming that the mitigation measures are in place, Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue will decrease to LOS 'E'. Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street are expected to operate at LOS 'D'. When background, project and Bolsa Chica impacts are considered together, the levels of service for the three intersections remain the same as above, assuming that the suggested mitigation measures are in place. In summary, the levels of service in the area surrounding the Meadowlark site will decrease measurably in the next ten years, largely due to normal growth and anticipated Bolsa Chica development. Only a small portion of the increased traffic is attributable to the proposed Meadowlark development. 2. MOODY CIRCLE ISSUES Moody Circle is not located within the study area, however, it is within close proximity to the west. The street is presently the focus of considerable debate regarding whether or not it should remain as a cul-de-sac connected to Pearce Street, or whether it should be blocked off at Pearce and continued further to the south. It is appropriate to analyze the Moody Circle issue in relation to Meadowlark Airport. The traffic and circulation section of Environmental Impact Report 87-2 indicates the need to retain Pearce Street as an access point for Meadowlark Airport. The connection of Pearce Street to Meadowlark, however, is to be designed in a manner which would minimize the use of Pearce. The continued connection of Moody Circle to Pearce Street will have no impact on the connection of Pearce Street to Meadowlark. If Moody Circle is blocked off at Pearce Street, there are two general alternatives for continuing it to the south. One option is to continue it a short distance south and then turn it out to Bolsa Chica Street. The second option is to continue it south to where it would connect with a second street running east and west. This street would then connect to Bolsa Chica Street and Meadowlark Airport. (8622d) -� Although circulation planning for Meadowlark Airport has not included this second access point south of and parallel to Pearce Street, it could be accommodated. Because this street would never be signalized at Bolsa Chica Street (and probably would not permit left turns), it should not be utilized entirely in place of Pearce Street. Rather, Pearce Street and this second street could both serve as access to Meadowlark Airport. In summary, any of the Moody Circle alternatives can be accommodated in planning for Meadowlark Airport. None of the alternatives, however, will permit Pearce Street to be discontinued as access to Meadowlark. The largest issues are the impacts of the Moody Circle alternatives on the marketability and design of the parcels south of Moody Circle which would be bi-sected by the continuation of the street. These issues are not within the purview of Environmental Impact Report 87-2. 3. AIRPORT WATER WELL At a recent meeting, that included the applicant, a discussion of an existing water well on the airport property raised some questions regarding the future inclusion of that well in the City's water system. Water Department staff conducted an assessment of the well to determine if it would be feasible, in the future, to incorporate the well into the City's water supply system. Their investigation resulted in a determination that it would not be cost effective to utilize the well. The reasons for their determination are as follow: 1. The well is too shallow. 2. The well is vulnerable to contamination from hazardous materials leaking from gas stations near the airport. 3. The well is near the end of its useful life. 4. The well has a history of low production. 4. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS A. Underground Storage Tanks 1. On-site Tanks According to the Orange County Healthcare Agency, Environmental Health, Waste Management Section, there are two known underground storage tanks in the study area. The tanks must be removed and the soil must be tested for contamination. If the soil or groundwater is contaminated, the Regional Water Quality Control Board should be contacted for cleanup requirements. �5 (::!4' 'd) i 2. Offsite tanks Since spills from underground storage tanks can migrate underground through the aquifer, it is important to identify nearby sources of contamination. Three known sources exist near the area of concern. Kayo Oil Company on the southeast corner of Warner and Bolsa Chica (Jet Station) and Mobile Oil on the northwest corner are both in the process of cleaning up underground gasoline spills. The free product will be removed and the contaminated groundwater will be cleaned up. According to Kurt Berchtold of the Regional Water Quality Control District, these spills are not impacting the Meadowlark site at this time. The contaminants may migrate in the southeasterly direction of the gradient. It is unknown how long the clean-up process will take. The GTE facility south of Warner on Bolsa Chica Street has released diesel fuel. The fuel contaminated the soil on-site but not the groundwater. Most of the contaminated soil has been removed. Fuel leaks from underground storage tanks is a common occurrence. Tanks must now be permitted and monitored. The cleanup of contaminated soil and groundwater is primarily supervised by the Regional Water Quality Control District. B. Abandoned Oil Wells Two abandoned oil wells exist in the study area. If necessary, the wells must be abandoned to current standards, as set forth by the Division of Oil and Gas before construction can occur. The DOG has recommended that construction be avoided over or in close proximity to any abandoned well. A City ordinance was recently adopted which states: "New structures shall not be constructed directly over abandoned wells unless due to the configuration of the property, it is necessary. If it can be proven safe and there is no other alternative, it may be allowed if procedures set forth by the Fire Chief are followed." Current Fire Department policy dictates that wells be properly abandoned and that venting system be installed to allow methane gas to vent safely outside of buildings. C. Methane Gas Areas of Huntington Beach are known to have a methane gas seepage problem. Methane gas is a natural by product of the decomposition of organic matter and of the formation of petroleum. Biogenic methane is associated with former or current wetlands, peat bogs, river bottoms, landfills and sewers. Petrogenic (or thermogenic) methane is associated with the formation of petroleum and can escape via abandoned well shafts. Methane seepage can become,a problem when development occurs on the surface. Concrete and asphalt pavement and foundations prevent the escape of the methane to the atmosphere. Consequently, the gas will concentrate underneath. If a crack develops in the asphalt or concrete the methane gas could escape at a higher concentration into the overlying structure, creating the potential for a fire or explosion. (8622d) Due to the size of the area of concern, and the potential for methane seepage through the two abandoned wells on the site, staff concurs with the Division of Oil and Gas (See Appendix) that the area should be studied to determine if methane is present on the site. If it is present in sufficient quantities to cause a problem for future development, mitigation measures, such as the installation of venting apparatus and the drilling of pressure relief wells, may be necessary. D. Surface Spills Surface fuel and chemical spills may have occured over the years due to airport maintenance and operations. A soils study should be performed to identify any contaminated areas. Cleanup may be necessary before development can occur. S. REVISED ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS Additional information affecting the Economic Considerations section in the EIR has been included in this Addendum. 1. Alternative 1 - Existing Airport Sales tax revenue was not reported, in the EIR, for business at Meadowlark because that type of data is protected by State privacy laws concerning individual business income. Another type of revenue generated by Alternative 1 and not reported in the EIR is personal property tax assessed on private aircraft domiciled (or tied-down) at the airport. Data was obtained on this issue from research conducted at the Orange County Tax Assessors office. There are approximately, according to tax assessors records, 200 airplanes domiciled (or tied-down) at Meadowlark that generated $5,983 in revenue collected by the City of Huntington Beach.* Therefore, the revised revenue/cost summary for Alternative I is as follows: Revenue = $ 9,537 Cost = $ 5,551 Revenue - Cost = $ 3,986 Revenue/Cost = 1.71 This summary indicates that the fiscal impact of the airport is positive which is in contrast to the original analysis in the EIR. * The most recent data available was for fiscal year 1985-1986. It is expected, for fiscal year 1986-1987, that the revenue will be similar to 1985-1986. �7 (8622d) Revenue/Cost Summaries for all Alternatives are as follows: Alt. 1 Alt.2 Alt.3 Alt.4 Revenue $9,537 $277,007 $515,870 $614,235 Cost $5,551 $125,921 $146,769 $179,592 Revenue — Cost $3,986 $151,086 $369,101 $434,643 Revenue/Cost 1.71 2.20 3.51 3.42 Alt. 5 Alt.6 Alt.7 Revenue $734,173 $671,852 $552,428 Cost $198,750 $195,070 $125,565 Revenue — Cost $535,423 $476,782 $426,863 Revenue/Cost 3.69 3.44 4.40 2. Cable Television/Utility Tax Revenue Recently, it was brought to staff's attention that the local cable television monthly flat rate fee has increased from $12.50 to $14.50. This two dollar increase per dwelling unit per month would result in a revenue increase, for the City, of 10 cents per dwelling unit per month or a $1.20 per unit, per year. For Alternatives 2 through 7, this cable TV revenue increase would, very minimally, increase the revenue for each alternative. The relationship of revenues and revenue to cost ratios would remain the same although the actual numbers will change, minimally. Because the additional revenue would result in such a minimal change the model was not reprogrammed at this time to accomodate this change. Within the next few months, staff will be updating the model and some of the assumptions and revenue factors, including cable television fees will be revised. l� (8622d) AREA 2.1 REVENUE COST ESTIMATES REVENUE ITEM ALT. #1 ALT. #2 ALT. #3 ALT. #4 ALT. #5 ALT. #6 ALT. #7 ----------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------- --------- PROPERTY TAX 3354 156953 196163 253283 241488 241569 158928 PERSONAL PROP. TAX 5983 0 0 0 0 0 0 SALES TAX 0 133 179639 180015 269086 220602 279847 UTIL!FRAN. TAX 0 47351 66186 94099 124949 111819 52672 BUS. LICENSE 180 0 938 938 1406 1125 1406 FFP 0 16588 16674 19635 22982 22438 13613 CIGARETTE TAX 0 4029 4049 4769 5581 5449 3307 MOTOR VEHICLE 0 39700 39905 46992 55002 53700 32595 GAS TAX FUND 0 12253 12316 14504 13679 15150 10060 TOTAL: $9517 $277007 $515870 $614235 $734173 $671852 $552428 COST ITEM GEN. ADMN. 0 42055 42055 42055 42055 42055 42055 POLICE 5551 24679 43948 66204 72784 7'427 33005 FIRE 0 43212 44567 52281 61565 514^.9 37176 COMM. SERVICES 0 12546 12610 14850 17381 16970 10300 PUBLIC WORKS 0 3429 3589 4202 4965 4809 3029 TOTAL: $5551 $125921 $146769 $179592 $198750 $195070 $125565 REVENUE - COST $3966 $151086 $369101 $434643 $535423 $476782 $426863 REV./COST RATIO 1 .71 2.20 3.51 3.42 3.69 3.44 .4.40 FILE NAME: END87-2.1 07/20/87 ! R ATTACHMENT S MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY ADDENDUM ' In the previous traffic impact study conducted for the proposed development of the Meadowlark Airport Site (Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade do Douglas, Inc. - March, 1987), future traffic volumes at the time the project's commercial phase is completed (near- term - 1991) and at the project's overall completion (long-term - 1996), were developed by factoring 1986 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) by a 3.5 percent annual ;;rowth factor. This factor was developed based on average traffic volume growth within the City of Huntington Beach over the past six years. As such, it was assumed to be a reasonable measurement to base anticipated growth in future traffic attributable to general land use intensification, development and through travel in the City. However, in light of the significant size and proximity of the proposed Bolsa Chicae development, some measurement of the projected traffic attributable to this project was necessary in addition to the above increase in background traffic. To accomplish this, City Staff contacted the Signal Landmark planning department and requested their best estimate of the amount of development to be completed by 1991 and 1996 which are the anticipated completion dates for Phase 1 and 2 of the proposed Meadowlark project. Using these land use estimates, anticipated ADT and afternoon peak hour volumes were projected and assigned to the future street system based on directional percent distributions utilized in the Huntington Beach traffic model developed by Parsons Brinckerhoff. These future volumes were then overlaid upon the near- and long-term volumes developed in the March 1987 traffic study, hence allowing an assessment of traffic impacts including the effects of the proposed Bolsa Chica development. It should be noted that other sources of projected traffic volumes at build-out of the City's General Plan were sought. however, at present there are no model data for this scenario available (although work is underway and once available will require further refinement to reflect specific trends within Huntington Beach). Using a 3.5 percent annual growth factor to project to a build-out year is of little value due to various influences which could alter growth patterns significantly (i.e., the location of future 020 -1- �—! freeway access, economic patterns, etc.). Also, designating a specific year as "build- out" is difficult to ascertain and yet imperative to this type of analysis. With respect to the above, a long-term scenario reflecting growth in existing background traffic, the Bolsa Chica development and the Meadowlark project, at the tune of its anticipated completion, has been determined to be the most appropriate basis for assessing traffic impacts at this time. The results from this analysis are presented below. Arterial Levels of Service Table 1 presents future arterial levels of service for ADT projections developed as described in the preceding paragraphs. These ratings should be used with care as they are based on daily volume averages which do not allow for site specific influences such as intersection geometries and the percent of daily traffic occurring during peak travel times. These service levels do allow for general area assessments at a "gener4 plan" level. ADT estimates for project traffic do not change from the March 1987 report (Figures 8, 9, and 10). Intersection Levels of Service To analyze intersection service levels, existing afternoon peak hour factors, direc- tional splits and intersection turning movement percentages were applied to the daily traffic projections to achieve estimates of 1991 and 1996 peak hour intersection turning movements for the signalized intersections. Levels of service were then determined using a microcomputer version of the Critical Movement Analysis pro- cedure detailed in Circular 212 of the Transportation Research Board, and by assuming future intersection geometries and improvements currently proposed by the City. Levels of service and V/C ratios for near and long-term intersections are presented in Tables 2 through 5 and are discussed below. Documentation of the critical movement analyses can be found in the Appendix. Near-Term Background Traffic: As can be seen in Table 2, when project and Bolsa Chica traffic is excluded, all of the signalized intersections except one are anticipated to be operating at acceptable levels of service CC' or better), assuming proposed arterial improvements, (three eastbound and three westbound through lanes on `Varner a� -2- _ TABLE 1 FUTURE ARTERIAL LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR STUDY AREA Near-Term Long-Term Without Project With Project Without Project With Project With With With With Background Bolsa Background Bolsa Background Bolsa Background Bolsa Roadway Limits Traffic Chica Traffic Chica Traffic Chica Traffic Chica Heil Avenue Algonquin to Bolsa Chico A A A A A A A A Heil Avenue Bolsa Chica to Graham D D D D F F F F Heil Avenue Graham to Springdale B B B B D D D D o Pearce Drive Bolsa Chica east to Terminus A** A** A** A** A'* A** C*' C** Warner :Avenue Algonquin to Bolsa Chica B* B* B* B* C' F* D* F' w Warner Avenue Bolso Chica to Graham A* As B* B* C* E* D* F* Werner Avenue Graham to Springdale A* B* B* 3* C* E* D* F' Bolsa Chica Road Edinger to Heil A A A A B D C E Bolsa Chica Road Heil to Earner A A A A B D C D Graham Street Edinger to Heil D D D D D D D D Graham Street Heil to Warner C C C C D D D D 'Assumes City improvements. "Based on 2,500 maximum ADT for residential streets per City of Huntington Beach Public '.yorks Department. �i l�L _ TABLE 2 NEAR-TERM AFTERNOON PEAK HOI R INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (without Bolsa Chica Taffic) With Project Without With Without Project Mitigation Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .86 D .92 E .84 D 3 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .33 A 2 .35 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue .74 C .76 C Heil Avenue/Graham Street .37 A 2 .38 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .67 B .71 C IAssumes arterial improvements currently planned by the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. 2Assumes that a two-phased signal is in place. 3Assumes a separate westbound right turn lane at Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street. o3 Avenue), are in place. The Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection is expected to operate at Level of Service (LOS) 'D' conditions, although some improvement in capacity over existing conditions is gained with the additional through lanes on Warner Avenue. Due to the potential interruption to the increasingly higher volumes along Bolsa Chica Street at the Pearce Drive/Bolsa Chica Street intersection, and the decreased arterial levels of service at the Heil Avenue/Graham Street intersection, both intersections warranted further service level analysis; therefore traffic signal warrants were prepared. The analysis indicated that near-term peak hour conditions without Bolsa Chica or project traffic are anticipated to warrant traffic signals at both inter- sections. Assuming a two-phase signal is in place, the corresponding levels of service at the Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Avenue intersection is expected to be LOS 'A' (.33 V/C ratio) and at the Heil Avenue/Graham Street intersection LOS 'A' (.37 V/C ratio). Near-Term Project Traffic: The addition of project traffic is anticipated to lower the level of service at Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue from 'D' to 'E", (an increase of .06 to the V/C ratio). Providing a separate westbound right turn lane is anticipated to increase conditions to LOS 'D'. The remaining intersections are expected to continue operation at acceptable levels of service ('C' or better). The addition of peak hour project traffic does not significantly change the levels of service discussed above for the near-term background traffic scenario. A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for the Warner Avenue/Project Access intersection. The warrant was satisfied with the inclusion of project vehicles alone, (i.e., as in a typical 'T' intersection with Warner Avenue), and is therefore recommended. A critical movement analysis was not conducted due to uncertainties regarding the location of project access across from Leslie Lane (hence a four-way intersection), or at some other location on Warner Avenue (resulting in a three-way intersection). Near-Term Eolsa Chica Traffic: The addition of anticipated Aolsa Chica near-term background traffic volumes decreases the level of service at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection to 'E' assuming no mitigations (see Table 3). Providing a separate westbound right turn lane is expected to increase conditions to LOS 'D'. The Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection is expected to be operating a� -5- s TABLE 3 NEAR-TERM AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (with Bolsa Chica Traffic) Without Project With Project Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .92 E .86 D3 .98 E .90 D3 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .35 A .36 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue .98 E .83 D4 1.10 F .86 D4 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .37 A .38 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .70 C .74 C 1Assumes arterial improvements currently planned b the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner P YP Y Y Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. 2Assumes that a two-phased signal is in place. 3Assumes a separate westbound right turn lane at Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street. 4Assumes altered signal phasing protecting both north/south left turns. 'V 1 II ' C at LOS 'E' as well; however, altering the signal phasing should increase conditions to LOS 'D'. The remaining intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels of service CC' or better) assuming signals are in place at the Pearce Drive/Bolsa Chica Street and Heil Avenue/Graham Street intersections and the proposed City improvements on Varner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street are in place. As in the case for background traffic, the addition of project traffic to this scenario lowers the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersections to LOS 'E' conditions without mitigation. However, assuming the previously discussed mitigations for these intersections are in place, conditions are anticipated to continue at LOS 'D'. Long-Term Background Traffic: Other mitigations anticipated to be necessary to achieve LOS 'D' conditions in addition to City and near-term improvements at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection include a separate northbound right turn lane, and a second eastbound left turn lane. At the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection, a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through/right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing are expected to be necessary. The other key intersections are expected to operate at LOS 'D' or better without mitigation. Table 4 summarizes the long-term intersection service levels excluding Bolsa Chica Traffic. Long-Term Project Traffic: Inclusion of project traffic without mitigation is expected to decrease the level of service at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersections to LOS T' which exceeds capacity. The mitigations discussed above are expected to improve conditions to LOS 'D'. The Warner Avenue/Graham Street intersection is anticipated to decrease to LOS 'D' which represents high-density, but stable traffic flows. The other two* key study area intersections are anticipated to operate at LOS 'A'. Mitigation measures for project traffic conditions are same as those discussed above for background traffic conditions. Long-Term Bolsa Chica Traffic: The addition of Bolsa Chica traffic is expected to require additional measures to mitigate impacts. Table 5 summarizes service levels and mitigations. In addition to the proposed City roadway improvements, near-term mitigations, and the mitigations discussed above for the background traffic without Bolsa Chica, other mitigations anticipated to be necessary at the Bolsa Chica o� I -7- s_ TABLE 4 LONG-TERM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICEI (without Bolsa Chica Traffic) Without Project With Project Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .95 E .82 D2 1.01 F .88 D2 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .39 A .42 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.12 F .81 D3 1.21 F .86 D3 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .42 A .43 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .81 D .88 D ca 1Assumes arterial improvements proposed by the City and proposed near-term mitigations. 2Assumes a separate northbound right turn and second eastbound left turn lane. 3Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. Car, TABLE 5 Op LONG-TERM PEAL{ HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICEI (with Bolsa Chica development traffic) Without Project With Project Without Mitigation With Mitigation Without Mitigation With Mitigation Intersection V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue 1.16 F .93 E2 1.22 F .99 E2 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .49 A .52 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.04 F .85 D3 1.09 F .89 D3 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .42 A .43 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .93 E .85 D4 1.01 F .89 D4 1Assumes arterial improvements proposed by the City and proposed near-term mitigations. 2Assumes a separate northbound right turn, a second northbound through lane and second eastbound left turn lane, and altered signal phasing. g 3Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a second northbound left turn lane, and a combination westbound through right lane replaces the right turn only lane. 4Assumes a third westbound through lane. Street/Warner Avenue intersection include a second northbound through lane and r altered signal phasing. However, conditions are expected to be improved to LOS 'E' only. This service level should be put into context and its impact not weighed too heavily in light of the uncertainties regarding these future conditions. As mentioned before, the 3.5 percent growth factor is a concervatively high estimate and there is some controversy as to whether the impacts of the Bolsa Chica development are not already included. Concerning the Bolsa Chica traffic itself, it is difficult to ascertain traffic flows because of uncertainties regarding the ultimate street system. In any case, this is a "best estimate" of conditions and should be viewed as such. At the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection, a second northbound left turn lane and altered signal phasing are expected to be necessary in addition to those mitigations for conditions without Bolsa Chica traffic. At the Warner Avenue/Graham Street intersection a third westbound through lane is anticipated. The addition of project traffic to the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection increase volume to capacity ratios by six percent. Conditions will remain at LOS 'E' with the above mitigations in place. Again, the relative contribution of the project to total conditions should be considered when assessing this project's impacts. Inclusion of project traffic is expected to decrease the level of service at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street intersections to LOS 'F, which exceeds capacity assuming the mitigations discussed above are not in place. The other two key study area intersections are anticipated to be operating at LOS 'A'. Again, the mitigations discussed above for the background traffic are expected to increase services levels to 'D' at the Bolsa Chica Street intersection with Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street intersection. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The 3.5% annual growth factor utilized to project future traffic volumes in this analysis was based on recent growth trends in the general City of Huntington Beach area. This rate can be expected to decrease somewhat in the future as the number of vacant parcels in the vicinity diminish. however, volumes are anticipated to continue to increase due to development of existing vacant land, intensifications of existing land uses (as with this proposed project), and further growth in traffic travelling a� i through the study area. Therefore, a 3.5% annual growth factor is in all likelihood a conservative measure but it can be easily substantiated by past experience. Traffic attributable to the proposed Bolsa Chica project alone could significantly impact the study area beyond those delineated for background traffic. Hence, an attempt was made in this analysis to include its effects. In the light of this the following mitigations are recommended for traffic conditions which incorporate background growth in volumes and traffic attributable to the Bolsa Chica development and Meadowlark project: Near-Term • Provide three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street (as the City currently plans). • Add a separate westbound right turn lane on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street. • Install traffic signals at the following intersections: Bolsa Chica Street/ Pearce Drive, Heil Avenue/Graham Street and, Warner Avenue/Project Access. • Alter the signal phasing at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue inter- section, protecting all left turns. Long-Term • Add a separate northbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/ Warner Avenue intersection. • Add a second northbound through lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection. A Provide a second eastbound left turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection. • Alter the signal phasing at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue inter- section, protecting all left turns. 3� • Add a separate southbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection. • Provide a second northbound left turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/lIeil Avenue intersection. • Replace the westbound right turn only lane with a combination through/ right lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection. • Add a third westbound through lane to the Warner Avenue/Graham Street intersection. I 31 S ATTACHMENT 6 EIR 87-2 Appendix K Addendum Comments and Responses Comments received after the EIR was prepared have been incuded in this extention of Appendix K. The order of the comments and staff's responses are as follows: 1. Airport Board 2. Division of Oil and Gas 3. Environmental Board 4. Mr. and Mrs. Ricks 5. UCLA Archaeology Clearinghouse 3� (8622d) AIRPORT BOARD 33 June 2, 1987 Members of the Planning Commission: 137 , •, . The Meadowlark Airport Board met on %lay 21, 1937, for the purpose of formulating comments on the Environmental ImpacT' Report (EIR) 87-2 pertaining to the proposed General Plan amendment for 1vleadowlark airport. Katherine Miller O'Hara was present at the meeting to receive the Board's verbal comments. 7,e folio-x.r.2 :s 3 sur-mary of the Board's comments. The Board requests that these ^^gents oe made part of the final Environmental Impact Report. 1. The Board believes that the airport issue is significant enough to the community th3: the residents living around the airport beyond the 300 feet notification area should be notified of public hearing. The Board believes that all the residents living afo)urd the airport should be notified so the city decision makers have the benefit of knowing how the residents feel about the airport and alternative lard uses. _ 2. T;ie Board believes that information used in the EIR report tends, at times, to be .; .t c; date. The Boar-- sited one example on page 21, section g, . Cinder this section, rea,�er :s led to believe that -Meadow View Elementary School is currently an ocera:ing eierrentary school facility. This school has been closed for approximately 3 years. The Board feels that more current information from outside agencies would be accrooriate. 3. Pay-- 7. Recent Historv. Tie Board believes that the statement "there are few take offs and landings occurring during the weekdays" is unfourded. The Board _i:Q_Jest?d tha: a survev would be the most appropriate method to indicate the number ci xeekda;: ta-.--offs and landings. It would be more appropriate for the report to .rdi,_ate t`;at take offs and landings are influenced by the weather conditions rather than weekday versus weekend use. Also, the report should re:lect the current in_1e-UD of the Meadowlark airport Board which is; 3 pilots, 3 residents, and the airpert/owner operator. 14. Page 14, Compatibility, Alternative #1, Existing Airport; the last sentence. The Board believes that the comment concerning the use of radio communications was unfounded and should be deleted. Also, the word "substantially" which is located in the last sentence should be deleted. 3. Page 17, Economic Consideration, Alternative #1; The overall economic analysis for the existing airport is inadequate. The Board believes that personal property tax for planes is not included. Gas tax from the fuel sold at the airport is not included. Various sales tax collected from businesses on the airport is not included. The Board believes that there should be a more careful analysis of the economic benefit that the current land use provides to the community. 6. Page 22, Table #3. The Board believes the number of school age children the development could generate is low. The Board suggested that the staff re-contact the school district to see if there die mdre current enrollment figures available. 7. Page 25 and 26. The pages in the report are reversed. 34 _ Planning Commissioners June 2, 1987 Page -2- 3. Page 34, a. Noise. A noise study reed to be done to substantiate that a noise impact from aircraft exists A noise contour rr:ap needs to be included in the EIR that shows what the noise impact from the airport is to surroure-ing land uses. 9. Page 38. The Board believes that the report should have included a section on wildlife (e.g. Meadowlark birj). 10. Page 39, Flood. The beard :elieves that the r�—purt needs to acdress crainage problems that affect property to the north of the study areas and have the EIR address the mitigating measures that will alleviate and correct flooding problems that are associated with the development proposal. 11. Page 39, Regional Airport/air- Traf fic Impact; - The report needs to discuss relocation costs for moving existing airplanes which are based at Meadowlark Airport. The Board believes that there are current laws on the books that require some type of relocation costs The Board requested the planning staff to look into this to see if there is any basis for this concern. 12. appendix A - General assumption. There needs to be included on the General Assumption Table for area 2.1, the asstiriptions per:•iining t^ the existing land use which is the airport. Currently, the tam ie does not include a discussion of that land use. 13. Appendix B - Fiscal Impact Model. Does not adequately address the fiscal impact pertaining to the Meadowlark airport. It is the Board's understanding that the California Department of Transportation, aeronautics Division. Goes have available a fiscal impact model for airports which may more accurately reflect the economic impart of the airport land use upon the community. The Board feels that this needs to '&-.e pursued. 14. Appendix C - Meadowlark Market Report Outline Area 2.1 - The Board believes that the information that was provided in this section really needs to be re-checked to be sure it adequately reflects todays situation. Particularly, the comment which states "61 % of the population in the area will have an income exceeding $35,000 by 1991" may be incorrect. The Board's feeling is that this may already be the case, rather than it actually happening in 1991. 15. If the airport is closed the board is concerned that it may give pilots of commercial airlines flying into Long Beach a sense that they can make their approach at a low attitude because fewer general aviation Manes are in the area. In conclusion, the Board generally believes that there needs to be more focus on any relocation costs for pilots who may be affected by the change in the land use. Also, they felt the issue of "the quality of life" needs to be addressed in the EIR. The-Board feels that the increase in the land ufe`densities as opposed to the current land use which provides for 80 acres of open space needs to be addressed. Lastly, there needs to be some discussion in the EIR concerning recreational loss to the residents of Huntington Beach as it relates to the airport. 35 �-- ' t Planning Commissioners June 2, 1987 Page -3- The Board would like to thank the Planning staff for the opportunity afforded us to comment on the EIR for Land Use Element Amendment 937-1. Sincerely yours, Crandall L. Gudmundson, A; Thomas Peel, •� Co-Chairperson Co-Chairperson CLG/TP:paj xc: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Richard Barnard, City Liaison to the Meadowlark airport Board 3� • AIRPORT BOARD 1. Comment: The Board believes that the airport issue is significant enough to the community that the residents living around the airport beyond the 300 feet notification area should be notified of public hearing. The Board believes that all the residents living around the airport should be notified so the city decision makers have the benefit of knowing how the residents feel about the airport and alternative land uses. Response: The area of notification has been expanded to over 1000 feet beyond the Meadowlark Airport. 2. Comment: The Board believes that information used in the EIR report tends, at times, to be out of date. The Board sited one example on page 21, section g,. Under this section, the reader is led to believe that Meadow View Elementary School is currently an operating elementary school facility. This school has been closed for approximately 3 years. The Board feels that more current information from outside agencies would be appropriate. r Response: Staff utilized the most current information that was provided by the appropriate agencies. 3. Comment Page 7, Recent HistM. The Board believes that the statement "there are few take offs and landings occurring during the weekdays" is unfounded. The Board suggested that a survey would be the most appropriate method to indicate the number of weekday takeoffs and landings. It would be more appropriate for the report to indicate that take offs and landings are influenced by the weather conditions rather than weekday versus weekend use. Also, the report should reflect the current make-up of the Meadowlark Airport Board which is; 3 pilots, 3 residents, and the airport/owner operator. Response: Art Nerio, the airport manager, and co-owner, was the source for the estimate of air traffic activity. It may have been more accurate to state that the majority of take-offs and landings occur on the weekend. A survey of takeoffs and landings was considered, however, records listing that type of data are fragmented, therefore it was not feasible to compile an accurate survey at this time. A 1974 noise study estimated an average of 150 takeoffs and 150 landings per day. This estimate, however, was an assumption, and not based on airport records or field verification. The airport operator has stated that takeoffs and landings are measurably less in 1987 compared to 1974. 3 ? 4. Comment: Page 14, Compatibility, Alternative #1, Existing Airport; the last sentence. The Board believes that the comment concerning the use of radio communications was unfounded and should be deleted. Also, the work "substantially" which is located in the last sentence should be deleted. Response: Comment noted. 5. Comment: Page 17, Economic Consideration, Alternative #1; The overall economic analysis for the existing airport is inadequate. The Board believes that personal property tax for planes is not included. Gas tax from the fuel sold at the airport is not included. Various sales tax collected from businesses on the airport is not included. The Board believes that there should be a more careful analysis of the economic benefit that the current land use provides to the community. Response: Research at the Orange County Tax Assessors office resulted in acquiring a figure for the City's portion of the personal property tax revenue generated by aircraft domiciled at Meadowlark Airport. The fiscal analysis will be revised to include the' additional revenue. Because of state laws protecting the privacy of tax revenue associated with individual business, gas tax and sales tax revenue generated by related business sales at Meadowlark could not be reported in the fiscal analysis. 6. Comment: Page 22, Table #3. The Board believes the number of school age children the development could generate is low. The Board suggested that the staff re—contact the school district to see if there are more current enrollment figures available. Response: Comment noted. 7. Comment: Page 25 and 26. The pages in the report are reversed. Response: Comment noted. 3� (8622d) 8. Comment: Page 34, a, Noise. A noise study needs to be done to substantiate that a noise impact from aircraft exists. A noise contour map needs to be included in the EIR that shows what the noise impact from the airport is to surrounding land uses. Response: A noise study was prepared by Wyle Laboratories in 1974 for the City's General Plan. The study identified noise contours from flight activity based on a single 2000 foot runway with a 300 foot displaced threshold. A noise contour map is attached, see adjoining Figure. 9. Comment: Page 38. The Board believes that the report should have included a section on wildlife (e.g. Meadowlark bird). Response: Discussions with the state Department of Fish and Game resulted in no identification of any wildlife on the Airport site that would require analysis. The Meadowlark is a bird common to fields and open areas in Southern California and is neither rare or endangered. 10. Comment: Page 39, F]ood. The board believes that the report needs to address drainage problems that affect property to the north of the study areas and have the EIR address the mitigating measures that will alleviate and correct flooding problems that are associated with the development proposal. Response: A hydrological study should be performed prior to approval of any conditional use permit. Conditions of approval should include the appropriate improvements. 11. Comment: Page 39, Regional Airport/Air-Traffic Impact; - The report needs to discuss relocation costs for moving existing airplanes which are based at Meadowlark Airport. The Board believes that there are current laws on the books that require some type of relocation costs. The Board requested the planning staff to look into this to see if there is any basis for this concern. Response: A recent telephone conversation with the Aeronautics Division of CALTRANS (May 26, 1987), Jerry Barber, Chief of Airport Operations, revealed that the State of California has no provision for-relocation costs for private aircraft and owners that have to relocate aircraft in response to the closure of a private airport by its owners. 39 (8622d) a Q �+ Meadowlark Golf Course U k� En C O lark Airport •• Ave. F P 0 1000 2000 3000 SCALE 1N FEET Q - CNEL 60 - 65 0 - CNEL 65 - 70 1974 - CNEL 70+ MEADOW LARK AIRPORT CNEL 601 65, AND 70 NOISE CONTOURS ZIA Figure 2-9 40 i 12. Comment: Appendix A — General Assumption. There needs to be included on the General Assumption Table for Area 2.1, the assumptions pertaining to the existing land use which is the airport. Currently, the table does not include a discussion of that land use. Response: General or specific assumptions for existing private airport operations were not available for this analysis. 13. Comment: Appendix B — Fiscal Impact Model. Does not adequately address the fiscal impact pertaining to the Meadowlark Airport. It is the Board's understanding that the California Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division, does have available a fiscal impact model for airports which may more accurately reflect the economic impact of the airport land use upon the community. The Board feels that this needs to be pursued. Response: The City has recently acquired a copy of the CALTRANS Airport Economic Impact Model and a review of the model is being conducted. 14. Comment: Appendix C — Meadowlark Market Report Outline Area 2.1 — The Board believes that the information that was provided in this section really needs to be re—checked to be sure it adequately reflects todays situation. Particularly, the comment which states "61% of the population in the area will have an income exceeding $35,000 by 1991" may be incorrect. The Board's feeling is that this may already be the case, rather than it actually happening in 1991. Response: Staff has reviewed the market analysis with the consultant and is satisfied with the income estimates and projections included in the report. 15. Comment: If the airport is closed the board is concerned that it may give pilots of commercial airlines flying into Long Beach a sense that they can make their approach at a low altitude because fewer general aviation planes are in the area. Response: Comment noted. (8622d) DIVISION OF OIL AND GAS i a r -D .. STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OFFICE Of THE GOVERNOR GEORGE DEUKMVIAN. Go+rnor OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH - 14W TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 (916/445=0613) Catherine O'Hara June 25, 1987 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: General Plan Amendment #87-2/ SCH# 86031206 Dear Ms. O'Hara: The enclosed cavnents on your draft .;�-vironmental documents were received by the State Clearinghouse after the end of the state review period . We are forwarding these comments to you because they provide information or raise issues which may assist you. in project review. To ensure the adequacy of the final document you may wish to incorpc•rate these additional corrrnents into the preparation of your final environmental document. Please contact Glenn Stober at 916/445-0613 if you have any questions I concerning the review process. When you contact the Clearinghouse in this matter, please use the eight digit State Clearinghouse manbPr so that we may respond promptly. i Sincerely, David C. %nenkamp ! Chief Office of Per-nit Assistance Enclosure I cc: Resources Agency I Al State of California THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CAUFOO" Memorandum : Dr. Gordon F. Snow Dart : JUN 2 2 1987 Assistant Secretary for Resources s,bied: SCH #86031206 Ms. Catharine O'Hara Draft EIR for Land Use City of Huntington Beach Amendment 87-2, City of 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Orange County From . Department of Conservation--OfFxo of tha Dkoctor The Department of Conservation's Division of Oil and Gas has reviewed the Draft EIR for the City of Huntington Beach Land Use Amendment 87-2, and submits the following comments for consideration. Presently, there are a few abandoned oil wells in the area of the proposed project. Therefore, if any structure is to be located over or in the proximity of a previously abandoned well, there is the possibility that the well may need to be reabandoned. Section 3208.1 of the Public Resources Code authorizes the State Oil and Gas Supervisor to order the reabandonment of any previous-ty abandoned well when construction of any structure over or in the proximity of the well could result in a hazard. The cost of reabandonment operations shall be the responsibility of the owner of the property upon which the structure will be located. Even though wells within the project area may not result in a hazard, or wells are reabandoned per Section 3208.1, a diligent effort should be made to avoid building over any abandoned oil well. To ensure proper review of the proposed building project, the Division has provided the City of Huntington Beach with a packet entitled "Construction Project Site Review and Well Abandonment Procedure". The packet includes a list of information that the project developer must submit to the Division for review. The project developer should contact the City of Huntington Beach Building Department for a copy of the site review packet. If any abandoned or unrecorded wells are uncovered or damaged during excavation or grading, remedial cementing operations may be required. Also, the Division must be contacted for reabandonment requirements and for obtaining approval to perform remedial work to any well. This building project will be located rear an area of known gas seeps (see Department of Conservation, Division of Oil and Gas report: "A Study of Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells and other Hazardous Gas Accumulations") . Methane Gas can accumulate beneath developed areas where concrete and asphalt surfaces prevent the natural migration of the methane gas to the atmosphere. If this occurs, and a crack develops in the concrete or asphalt at some late gas could migrate into the interior of the overlying structur _ tential of causing an explosion or fire. !! ✓cam r �Q�4 lgrj �- Dr. Gordon F. Snow Ms. Catharine O'Hara - Page 2 Therefore, it may be necessary for the final EIR to include a study of the area to determine the likelihood of this type of occurrence. If the study indicates that gas accumulation is a possibility, it may be necessary to drill some shallow, pressure-relief wells adjacent to the site. Also, gas detectors and venting systems should be installed in areas where ignition of methane gas could occur. If you have any questions, please contact Ken Carlson at the Division of Oil and Gas district office in Long Beach. The address is 245 W. Broadway, Suite 475, Long Beach, CA 90802; phone (213) 590-5311. Dennis J. O'Bryant • Environmental Program Coordinator cc: Ken Carlson, Division of Oil and Gas, Long Beach Bob Reid, Division of Oil and Gas, Sacramento MH:DJC :mww , f I 1 i i DIVISION OF OIL AND GAS 1. Comment: The DOG states that there are a few abandoned oil wells in the area of the proposed project. Therefore, if any structure is to be located over or in the proximity of a previously abandoned well, the well may need to be reabandoned. A diligent effort should be made to avoid building over any abandoned well. Response: There are two known abandoned wells located on the subject property. A condition of approval for any Conditional Use Permit on the site should be that all wells be abandoned to current Division of Oil and Gas standards. Additionally, a diligent effort should be made to avoid locating structures over or in near proximity to any abandoned oil well. 2. Comment: The DOG states that the project will be located near an area of known gas seeps. Methane gas can accumulate beneath developed areas where concrete and asphalt surfaces prevent the natural migration of the methane gas to the atmosphere. If a crack develops in the asphalt or concrete at some later time, the gas could migrate into the interior of the overlying structure, creating the potential for an explosion or fire. Therefore, it may be necessary for the final EIR to include a study of the area to determine the likelihood of this type of occurence. It may be necessary to mitigate the problem. Response: Areas of Huntington Beach are known to have a methane gas seepage problem. Prior to approval of a Conditional Use Permit, soils analysis should be performed to identify existing levels of methane, if any. If it is determined that development on the site would be subject to a methane leakage problem, proper venting and monitoring devices, and possibly relief wells should be installed in and around all structures. �W (8622d) i ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD %• + Environmental Board CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ,,.� ... ....�.�N POSI OTI,,:e 0 -, 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 June 1, 1987 Kent Pearce, Chairman Huntington Beach Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Pearce: The 87-2 Adhoc Committee of the Huntington Beach Environmental Board has met on several occasions to review the Land Use Element pertaining to the Meadowlark Airport. It is the recommendation of the Adhoc Committee and the Huntington Beach Environmental Board that the Meadowlark Airport portion of the document is inadequate and should not be certified. Attached is a copy of the Adhoc Committee ' s response to the Environmental Check List and a summary of the recommendations I .- denial . Thank you for your consideration in this matter. SirCcerely, j Corinne Welch Chairman 87-2 Adhoc Committee Dean Albright, member Gail Altimari-Brown, member Tom Steel , member Mark Conley, member Dale Brandon, member Lee Weider, Chairman Huntington Beach Environmental Board cc: City Council Planning Commission Ruth Finley, liaison Tom Mays, liaison - Peter Green, liaison Jim Palin 87-2 ADHOC COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, May 27, 1987 SUMMARY Recommendation of thi-. •Adhoc-Committee 87-2 - Meadowlark Airport This project should be denied for the following reasons: 1. Sewage No approval for any development of this site should be permitted until a new system of handling the additional volume is in operation. At a public hearing on May 19, 1987, a representative from the Orange County Sanitation District stated the Slater Avenue pumping station in District 11 was at capacity and could not handle any more volume. it was his recommendation that a new pumping facility and trunk line be constructed prior to any further development of the area. I -his area does not include the Bolsa Chica Project and no phasing in of any project will alleviate the problems th1t now exist. 2 . Drinking Water According to the Huntington Beach Water Department the development of this site would put a strain on the existing water supplies, as well as future projections in the north end of the city. 3 . Traffic The study of traffic impact in the area was grossly understated. Degradation of traffic capacity will occur with increased development. The traffic impact from the Bolsa Chica and Graham Street projects are not included in the analysis. 4 . Air The site is located in the South Coast Air Basin which currently exceeds the state and/or national ambient air quality standards. ref. page 34b SUMMARY It is the recommendation of the ADHOC Committee that the Land Use Element Amendment 87-2 - Meadowlark Airport, is inadequate and should remain in the current zoning of low density residential, with the existing airport continuing to operate until the above environmental concerns have been mitigated. It is also recommended that this portion of the document not be certified. i 5-� 87-2 ADHOC COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, May 6, 1987 Purpose: Study Land Use Element 87-2 Environmental Impact Report 87 2 The following are questions and concerns the committee has regarding the report with reference to the Environmental Checklist, Appendix #1 : 1 . Earth b. This area has been determined to be archaeologically sensitive by The Institute of Archaeology at UCLA. The Institute should be notified of the proposals. ref. page 38 D. , 2 . Air b. The site is located in the South Coast Air Basin which currently exceeds the state and/or national ambient air quality standards. ref. page 34 b. Any of the five alternative plans would significantly impact the area. NOTE: Nothing in the study reports the levels of Methane gas on the site in other areas t:ian the two abandoned oil well sites. This may also affect air quality by blocking natural ventilation with development. No yore samples were shown on the report regarding this site previously being used for refuse dumping. 3 . Water b. All of the alternative plans will direct water runoff from the site onto adjoining property and roadways. Flood control channels in the area terminate southwest of Heil and Algonquin. 4 . C. As a recommendation only, the committee would request that landscaping by consistent with its coastal location and maintain the species of plant life consistent with our area. 9 . Natural Resources b. All alternative plans will impact the open space and natural topography of the area. The Monarch Butterfly population in the wooded area northeast of the site may be affected, ref. page 21. 5/ 10 . Risk of Upset a. Further studies are necessary to determine the levels of methane gas on the site, as well as any seepage from the existing oil operations and fuel storage tanks. Any one of these may be a_potent}'_al for explosion. 11 . Population All of the alternatives will increase the population of the area. 13 . Transportation d. The specific impacts from the Bolsa Chica are not included in the analysis. Existing arterial level of service does not include long-term traffic impacts of 14 , 300 ADT. Page 26 , Table 4 , ref. page 30 #1. 14 . Public Service e. A network of new streets and accesses would be required of all the development plans except #1 . 16 . Sewers/Septic Tanks 41 d. The city staff report shows existing service lines are capable of handling the additional volume. ref. page 18 , #1 . The Orange County Sanitation District maintains the Slater Avenue pumping station is to capacity and cannot handle this additional volume. ref. page 18 , #4 . Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering for the OCSO says a new pumping station is required to handle the new development. ref. page 18 . Any new improvements to the current system would cost $12-15 million and take up to five years to complete. No money is in the budget at the present time. e. Storm Drains: a new storm drain system is required for this site as the existing system is inadequate. 17 . Human Health a. Exposure to methane gas b. Exposure to a potential dumpsite area. The study should include investigation of this site for it being previously used as a dumpsite. 19 . Recreation 5� Displacement of 128 airplanes/owners from the area. 20. Cultural Resources This area has been determined to be in a historical/archaeological, area.- I ' I i 53 I ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Letter of May 6, 1997 1. Comment: Earth This area has been determined to be archaeologically sensitive by the Institute of Archaeology at UCLA. The Institute should be notified of the proposals. ref. page 38 D. Response: The Institute of Archaeology has been notified and their response is included in this addendum to the EIR. 2. Comment: Air The site is located in the South Coast Air Basin which currently exceeds the state and/or national ambient air quality standards. ref. page 34 b. any of the five alternative plans would significantly impact the area. NOTE: Nothing in the study reports the levels of Methane gas on the site in other areas than the two abandoned oil well sites. This may also affect air quality by blocking natural ventilation with development. No core samples were shown on the report regarding this site previously being used for refuse dumping. Response: Air and soil sampling should be performed to determine if methane gas is present. If the gas could potentially cause an explosive hazard for new development, pressure relief wells and monitoring venting devices should be installed. Also see response to the State Division of Oil and Gas included in this Addendum. 3. Comment: Water All of the alternative plans will direct water runoff from the site onto adjoining property and roadways. Flood control channels in the area terminate southwest of Heil and Algonquin. Response: Comment noted. 5y� (8622d) 4. Comment: As a recommendation only, the committee would request that landscaping by consistent with its coastal location and maintain the species of plant life consistent with our area. Response: Comment noted. Comments 5 through 8 were not included in the Environmental Board's letter of May 26. 9. Comment: Natural Resources All alternative plans will impact the open space and natural topography of the area. The Monarch Butterfly population in the wooded area northeast of the site may be affected, ref. page. 21. Response: Comment noted. The State Department of Fish & Game, who has been contacted about the proposed project does not think the project will disturb the butterflys. Also, the wooded area, Gibbs Park, will incur minor imporvements in the next five years which will not disturb the Monarch butterfly habitat. 10. Comment: Risk of Upset Further studies are necessary to determine the levels of methane gas on the site, as well as any seepage from the existing oil operations and fuel storage tanks. Any one of these may be a potential for explosion. Response: Soils analysis should be performed to determine if any organic material or contaminants are present. Appropriate mitigation or cleanup measures should be required. 11. Comment: Population All the alternatives will increase the population of the area. Response: Comment noted. Comment No. 12 was not included in the Board's letter. (8622d) 13. Comment: Transportation The specific impacts from the Bolsa Chica are not included in the analysis. Existing arterial level of service does not include long—term traffic impacts of 14,300 ADT. Page 26, Table 4, ref. page 30 #1. Response: A revised study including specific impact estimates from the proposed Bolsa Chica development will be conducted. Also, table 4 only addresses what exists! Table 5 addresses near and long term impacts. 14. Comment: Public Service A network of new streets and accesses would be required of all the development plans except #1. Response: Comment noted. r Comment No. 15 was not included in the Board's letter. 16. Comment: Sewers/Septic Tanks The city staff report shows existing service lines are capable of handling the additional volume. ref. page 18, #1. The Orange County Sanitation District maintains the Slater Avenue pumping station is at capacity and cannot handle this additional volume. ref. page 18, #4. Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering for the OCSD says a new pumping station is required to handle the new development. ref. page 18. Any new improvements to the current system would cost $12 — 15 million and take up to five years to complete. No money is in the budget at the present time. Storm Drains: a new storm drain system is required for this site as the existing system is inadequate. Response: City and County sewer lines can accommodate the development as it is proposed. The applicant understands that they may need to participate in improvements to the Slater Pump Station if the Coast Trunk line is not in place near the point of build—out of the proposed development. As indicated on page 19 of the EIR some augmentation of the storm drain system will be necessary to accomodate the proposed project. The augmentation is considered feasible by the City's Public Works Department. 56 (8622d) 17. Comment Human Health: Exposure to methane gas. Exposure to a potential dumpsite area. The study should include investigation of this site for it being previously used as a dumpsite. Response: Comments were addressed previously regarding methane gas. Response pending regarding the dumpsite. 18. Comment No. 18 was not included in the Boards letter. 19. Comment: Recreation Displacement of 128 airplanes/owners from the area. Response: There are approximately 200 aircraft domiciled at Meadowlark Airport. 20. Comment: Cultural Resources This area has been determined to be in a historical/archaeological area. Response: Staff has corresponded with the State Historic Preservation Office and the Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, the regional clearinghouse. A response from UCLA is included in this addendum. i 57 (8622d) ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD LETTER OF MAY 27, 1997 AD-HOC COMMITTEE "This project should be denied for the following reasons:" 1. Comment: Sewage No approval for any development of this site should be permitted until a new system of handling the additional volume is in operation. At a public hearing on May 19, 1987, a representative from the Orange County Sanitation District stated the Slater Avenue pumping station in District 11 was at capacity and could not handle any more volume. It was his recommendation that a new pumping facility and trunk line be constructed prior to any further development of the area.* This area does not include the Bolsa Chica Project and no phasing in of any project will alleviate the problems that now exist. Response: Sanitation District improvements are needed to support additional development in the area served by the Slater Pump Station. Development of the area of concern should Te phased to coincide with the improvements. 2. Comment: Drinking Water According to the Huntington Beach Water Department the development of this site would put a strain on the existing water supplies, as well as future projections in the north end of the city. Response: The development could result in a negative impact on the City's water service, however, a specific assessment if the impacts generated by the proposed development cannot be conducted until the completion of the Water Department Master Plan, which is expected in October 1987. 3. Comment: Traffic The study of traffic impact in the area was grossly understated. Degradation of traffic capacity will occur with increased development. The traffic impact from the Bolsa Chica and Graham Street projects are not included in the analysis. * The May 19th meeting was a Planning Commission study session, not a Public Hearing. (8622d) - /, -2 r7 Response: The traffic analysis is being revised to include potential impacts from the development of the Bolsa Chica. 4. Comment: Air The site is located in the South Coast Air Basin which currently exceeds the state and/or national ambient air quality standards. ref. page 34b Response: Comment noted. 59 (8622d) MR. AND MRS. RICKS r 66 G vz Ralph 3 Ronna RicKs 5362 O l d pirate Ln Huntington Beach , CA 92649 22 June 87 -' PI ann ing Commiss ion Members Mayor and Members of the City Council MeadowlarK Airport Board City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St . Huntington Beach CA 92648 SUBJECT: Proposed Land Use Element Amendment 87-2f EIR 87-2 PfL.TEF2N00iTE 1 s Me:A00WL.AFZK A I FZF30F2T The person writing this portion of the report did consult the FAA and the Calif . D.O.T. , but obviously did not consult the local source of information and expertise : the city 's own MeadowlarK Airport Board . The report stated that air traffic has increased at ALL airports in southern California in the last seven , ears . The only statistics available for Meadowlark say just the opposite : traffic has " 'creased at least 25% in this period . There were approximately 200 aircraft based at MeadowlarK in 1980. Today there are less than 150. There were two flight schools at MeadowlarK in 1980i today there is just one . The report cited the lacK of a control tower as a negative factor . When pressed , the FAA will admit that the only purpose of a control tower is to Keep aircraft SEPARATED FROM EACH OTHER. It is obvious that a control tower at MeadowlarK would have been a gross waste of money . There has been only one collision in the last fifteen years that involved MeadowlarK . That accident resulted in only very minor injuries , and those were to the pilot of a small home-built aircraft whose design prevented him from adequately seeing the runway on his approach . The pilot of the plane he landed upon did not even realize there had been a collision and continued his taKeoff roll . MeadowlarK is not uncontrolled traffic , it is pilot controlled traffic . The aircraft fly a pre-designated pattern and announce their positions over the radio . This is FAA approved procedure . Contrary to the report , there are almost no aircraft at MeadowlarK today that lacK a radio . Radios 'are available that cost as little as $300. Co I ALTERNATIVE 1 : MEADOWLARK AIRPORT page P On the other hand , construction of an FAA approved control tower costs in the realm of a million dollars . Add to that at least a quarter of a million dollars per year for salaries and maintenance , and you have a gross waste of money . Furthermore , it is unliKely that MeadowlarK has a high enough traffic count to meet FAA qualifications to even justify a tower . The comparatively short runway at MeadowlarK is listed as a negative safety, factor . It is not . The size of the runway just limits the variety of aircraft that use it . If MeadowlarK had a longer , wider runway , there would just be larger and faster aircraft using it . The accidents that have occurred at MeadowlarK can all be traced to pilot error . The recent fatal accident that occurred next to MeadowlarK airport is not really related to the safety of operations at MeadowlarK . That aircraft was out of gas and was going to come down somewhere in Huntington Beach anyhow . What about the possibilities for MeadowlarK? A progressive management at MeadowlarK would long ago have allowed commuter airlines to service MeadowlarK . Some twin engine turboprop commuter aircraft that serve Orange County Airport are quieter than most single engine aircraft and can use runways much shorter than MeadowiarK 's . As the freeways become more clogged , a commuter service to LAX becomes more valuable to Huntington Beach . Also lacKing in the report was consideration of tourism. Many aircraft come to MeadowlarK and Huntington Beach as a tourist destination . A little promotion would provide good dividends . Does Huntington Beach have a disaster plan? The American Red Cross says that we ARE SURE to have a disastrous iarthquaKe within the next several years . Huntington Beach will be marooned as if on an island . The first three days are critical . Ground transportation will be nonexistent . Most freeway overpasses will be down--blocKing both the freeways and the surface streets . The closest source of help will IiKely be from Nevada or Arizona. MeadowlarK airport is on a mesa whose surface is expected to remain relatively intact compared to much of Huntington Beach . Many of the aircraft at MeadowlarK could provide emergency services to Huntington Beach in that critical -first few days . The communities with access to air transportation will be the ones to get help first . Please do not shortchange the value of MeadowlarK Airport . We need to explore the possibility of obtaining a lease on MeadowlarK for the good of Huntington Beach . S rel 1\41k 40 Ralph D. RicKs RESPONSE TO LETTER FROM MR. & MRS. RICKS: 1. Comment: The person writing this portion of the report did consult the FAA and the Calif. D.O.T., but obviously did not consult the local source of information and expertise: the city's own Meadowlark Airport Board. Response: As we did with the Environmental Board, copies of the Environmental Impact Report were distributed to the Airport Board for their review and comment. Staff has received a comprehensive reply to the EIR from the Airport Board which has been reviewed and will formally be responded to in the Addendum to the EIR. 2. Comment: The report stated that air traffic has increased at ALL airports in southern California in the last seven years. The only statistics available for Meadowlark say just the opposite: traffic has decreased at least 25% in this period. Response: The comment regarding increased air traffic was generally referring to commercial airports in Southern California. There are, however, no statistics available regarding a decrease in air traffic generated by Meadowlark Airport. Art Nerio, the airport manager said that in the last several years, aircraft traffic has been stable with no noticeable decrease or increase. Neither the Nerio Family or the City has done an analysis of air traffic associated with Meadowlark in the last seven years. 3. Comment: There were approximately 200 aircraft based at Meadowlark in 1980. Today there are less than 150. There were two flight schools at Meadowlark in 1980; today there is just one. Response: The estimate of 150 planes tied down (or domiciled) at Meadowlark reported in the EIR was provided by the applicant. Since the publication of the Draft EIR, staff has had the opportunity to research Orange County Tax Assessor records and the most recent data available, fiscal year 1985-1986, listed 203 aircraft domiciled at Meadowlark. Preliminary data indicate that the 203 aircraft will be the same number for fiscal year 1986-1987 (county report due in August 1987). Also, the applicant told staff that there are two flight schools operating at the airport. W/J (8622d) F'ink FiSa3t`JS EiFti I h1(--U _EFil C3F::-F CFi. I T I C42,Ir h°1ClVFhr1EhjT ffNhJF`�1-YS I S ]ECC3 _.S I CA / W tc�F-;:PAEF:;! 1._I�.IS -r-M #!!2kL-T _ 1 W z m I T (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION v?V 1 CRITICAL N/S VOL 7t>46:31 CRITICAL E/W VOL BS:' CRITICAL SUM 1 S LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I R. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 T'. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 1 '. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 4 T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 85 119`. 485 13 7 HRU 155 .rye'45 1810 162 RIGHT 95 875 40 665 TRUCKS (::> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 = i. EASTBOUND 5 = 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) i CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 91 269 643 628 LEFT 44 665 254 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 65 1195 485 105 ADJUSTED VOL 44 1267 485 i) CAPACITY ii 15 239 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK: '�3 F'AFZZSCINS EtF;z I [NJ CH-_EFi"C 1=F C:F_< I T ]= CAL_ M C3 WI—=t tENT dc�NAI _ Y'S I S E-9C3l__C3 c: I Cif W+4F<IVO=F=< 1._.C3NG T1=F;:M ELT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL- OF SERVICE F SATURATION 1_ _I_ l l CRITICAL N/S VOL #=3^_7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 1 CRITICAL SUM 1 f--;, ######�r###�'c••�c•i#•Yc•*##�••i#####�E••ir#•iE•#•#••+i•i•#•##•i# LANE GEOMETRY h10RTHBOLJN1) SOUTHB0UND Er=19TF-*,'OUND WESTDOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MO',. WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH R. . 1 _ ci F'1:T. 1C. c_► R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 1�'. i) R. . T. . 12. C T. . 12. Q L. . 1'�'. C) T. . 12. C) T. . 1.2, C T. . 12. 4 , . . . . . . L. . 12. i) T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. i) . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT B5 1 175 4851 1. 5 THRU 155 245 1 8off)0 161 C) RIGHT 95 875 40 65� TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF--; HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND j _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 1 WESTBOUND 3 1 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH Bo SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 174 269 639 624 LEFT 44 653 485 0 LEFT TURN CHECF.:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 85 1175 485 1=5 ADJUSTED VOL_ 44 1.=4 1 485 0 CAPACITY 15 47C- MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK �� PARSONS EsR 11,JCU`ERI—IOFF::::- CR I- T I CdnrI_ M(DVEMEIhJ-T_ 44IVAL_`�S I S E; C]L_Sinh CI-1 I CA f LAJAF; r4J =R I_INIO TM ink L_-T (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL- OF SERVICE F. SATURA I-ION CiP S X. CRITICAL N/S VOL -'44 CRITICAL E/W VOL 8_'£0 CRITICAL SUM I q LANE GEOMETRY N 0 R T 1 iJ OLJIND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNI) LANE 1`10'•J U!I DTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 1 '. i� R. . 1--. i� RT. 1� i) R. . 1 . C T. 1'?. 0 R. . 12. U T. . 12. cj T. . 12. i) T. . 12. �� T. . 12. 0 T. . 12, ii T. . 12. C� 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. C-) L. . 121. 0 T. . 1;'. 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 85 1175 485 1_5 THRU 155 :'_45 18�<_� 1 b 1 U RIGHT 95 975 40 65C? TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 91 269 639 624 LEFT 44 653 254 C? LEFT TURN CHECK. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME o5 1175 485 1 5 ADJUSTED VOL 44 1245 485 i) CAPACITY C-) i) 15 2�9 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OF::: | �� Cl�� . �� | �� DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE ff�b SATURATION Z!F 711— CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL 63.�- CRITICAL SUM 1-f-5 C=?�f ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MO',,' WIDTH 1 RT. 15' 0 RT. 15' 0 RTL 15. 0 RTL 15' 0 2 T. ' 12' 0 T. 12' 0 ' . . ' . ' ' . . ' . . . . T. . 12' 0 ' . ' . . . ' . ' ' . . . ' 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12' 0 . . . ' ' ' . . . . . ' . . 5 . . . . . . . . ' . ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' ' . . . . . . . . 6 ' . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . ' . . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 34 56 62 19 THRU 755 1339 2 4 RIGHT 34 122 51 36 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR> PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 95 WESTBOUND 5 3 . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 ' NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 416 532 63 50 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 34 56 62 19 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY 0 116 13 0 MOVEMENT OK OK OK OK v,/ ' ��1B C3 P4!E3 E-c F:;: I t%4(:::I-:--F=-F;:"C:)F:-F=- �� I � I �� E=M� �� ' 1ECC31 S;inb -F��F=;:M � � F="F;:C),JEE(—_l- DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE onk SATURATION zz!; 7,'- CRITICAL N/S VOL !ff;_7E3 CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM 4!5=p-4 :1 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15, 0 RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 2 T. 12. 0 T. ' 12' 0 ' ' ' . ' . . . . . . . . . 3 L. . 12. 0 T' ' 12' 0 ' . . ' . . ' . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. 12. 0 . . . ' . ' ' . . . ' ' . . 5 ' ' ' ' ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . 6 ' . ' ' . . . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' . ' ' . ' . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 34 56 62 19 THRU 831 1463 2 4 RIGHT 34 122 51 36 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 95 WESTBOUND 5 3 . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 456 578 63 50 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK � NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 34 56 62 19 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 | C"APACITY 0 122 13 0 | MOVEMENT OK OK OK OK � � �� F'AF;�E3OhJS BF-< I NGO-:`EF-<HOF"F" GF,< I T I iGAIL MQk.•'EMEINI-1- I S E-4C3L_E3A GH I GA f F'I=ink F<GO= I%JE ink F=;: TEO=,:M hJC3 F'F:R O.1 CT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/37 LEVEL OF S(_=RVICE A SATURATION CRITICAL_ N/S VOL —E� :1 CRITICAL E/W VOL 4!S3-a-f-5 CRITICAL_ SUM 4!E:p�'� LANE GEOMETRY N0IF"TI-IBOUN1) SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE= MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1-5. 0 RT. 1.5. 0 RTL 15. O RTL 1 �= T. 1C. �� T. . 17), . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 1C. t� T. . 1'?. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12,. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L_EF f =:� J5 6C_) THRU 001G 1420 5 5 RIGHT ?5 120 'S TRUCk::S (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND , 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8t) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 445 561 65 50 LEFT U 0 p 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME =5 55 btu ADJUSTED VOL_ i) p i i CAPACITY 0 116 15 MOVEMENT OK: OK.' OK Of:: F'ink FRSQtVS E-cR I Nick::E:F;: L7FF C f-:;� I -1- I C E-11_ M C3 4-*IE M F= tq_F 44 C- LI 'Y'S I S EcSL'SA CI-1 I CA Z F'Ednk F;:(--E I" IEAF-< TEIF<M W f F'RQ,J ECT' (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL 4!5�C)_7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 6t5 CRITICAL SUM 6, LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBI)UNI) SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV W I D'TH MOV WIDTH 1 R i.5, C) RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. (--) RTL 15. C) f. . I-,. C) T. 1?. Cr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 T. . 14L. o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 127. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES fF' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LL_ I J .J.J 60 "?o ('HRU OOJ 154 15 5 RIGHT T5 1 2C) 50 35 TRUCE:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ , 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ , 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 485 607 65 50 LEFT 0 i? 0 G LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME =;5 55 6(-? ^0 ADJUSTED VOL. Ci C) CAPACITY C MOVEMENT DF`: 0k:: OF:: 0F:: F:::'ick F;:c-3 C3 INJ E; E-C F;: I t%J(--U---- F;: C3 F�:-F:::- C:�F;: I _1F I C�oc�I— M C3 W EE M r=-114-1F L_ E3 I E3 - Ec C)L_S; C� I Z F='F=#!:�k F;:C:�r=- ��t%li 113 -1F F=_F;:m t\i C:) �[::;:C3-7 C::_1F DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE SATURATION zv�� CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL ��c? CRITICAL SUM -7 C-1 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15, 0 RTL 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 2 T' . 12' 0 T' . 12. 0 ' . . ' ' ' ' 3 L' . 12' 0 T. ' 12. 0 ' . . ' ' . . . ' ' . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. ' 12. 0 . . . . ' . . ' ' ' ' . . . 5 . . . . . . . . ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , _ _ , _ 6 . . ' ' . . . . . ' ' ' , . . . ' . . . . . . ' ' ' . ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 67 74 23 THRU 987 1738 2 5 RIGHT 40 145 61 43 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 513 651 69 55 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND � INPUT VOLUME 40 67 74 23 � ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 � CAPACITY 0 138 14 0 | MOVEMENT OK OK OK OK � ~�� t='ink FzSOt^.IS IC-sFt I tVCI-::-FEE Fti (3FF" C�Fi I _1F I CAL M(7 I_MEhi-IF At`•tAL 13 I S r=cC)L_ 7- A C-_ I CA f P'E ink F:ZCE LC3t%4(�3 -IF EF=;ZM AF='F'l_ I CAtVT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE 4� SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL p CRITICAL E/W VOL lB-4 CRITICAL. SUM -7 Z#6- LANE GE01`ll=l"RY NORTHBOUND IOU (HBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LAPIE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i. RT. 15. 0 RT. 1C7. RTL. i.`,. RTL 115. L. . 12. C) T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r_ 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEF f 4(__) 1121 74 _ THRU 1065)65 1849 4 5 RIGHT 40 145 61 74 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEW,` HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1. SOUTHBOUND S _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 552 690 71 84 LEFT i) 0 c_) i) LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 40 112 74 2' ADJUSTED VOL i) C) 0 i) CAPACITY c_) 1? MOVEMENT 0FF:: 0H OL::: 0k:: / F'AFRSOhJS ]E{Ft I t\JCF-_FEE F:HOF F" CFI I T I CAL MOVEMENT AEVALYS I S L--�OL_SA CH I CA / F'EAF::;:CFEE L_C3hBC TEAM A T _ 1 DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4-::T.1 CRITICAL N/S VOL a5:3-E3-' CRITICAL E/W VOL S CRITICAL_ SUM -76'9 LANE GEOMETRY NOI�THI=iI-!L�hJI) SOUTHBOUhJD EASTI'•OUhJD I�JESTDOUNI) L...ANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i. RT. 15. C? RT. ].5. C) RTL 15. Cf RTL 15. C) 1 . . 1 '. C) T. . 12. C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTI-]FOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 108 74 -'_.3 THRU 1 58 1840 4 5 RIGHT 4C.) 145 61 71 TRUCF:::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAh:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 5 = 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 549 687 71 82 LEFT C) c_) c_) i� LEFT TURN CHECti: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 40 108 74 2 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 i) C) CAPACITY i) 1:7.8 0 11 MOVEMENT Ok; OK.. OF: Ok:: 5A F'AFtiSQtVS E�F:7< I hJ E=—:FZ"C3FF CFI: I T I CAL MC3kC3C_ m E_=140T A1N!ink L'YS I S U-4CII-SA cH I CA f 1^'EAF:;:CE L.OtVG TEF::;:h''1 ink IL_T _ DATE: 9/9/a7 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURAT I ON -4 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL _76-5i CRITICAL SUM LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHI=iOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. i.5. 0 RT. 1.5. C) RTL C) RTL_ 15. 0 T. 12. 0 T. . 12. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . ice'. �� T. 12. �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 1`y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 98 74 THRU 1041 1314 _ 5 RIGHT 40 145 61 64 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAP. HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTH9OUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH Bo SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 540 678 70 75 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 4C) 9B 74 ADJUSTED VOL 0 t 0 L0 CAPACITY C) 1 g i i 5 MOVEMENT OK Ok:: Ok:_ OK 53 F'AF:ZSO 113F: I NCF=:EFRHCQFF" CR I T I CAL— MC3 MENT ANPhL_YS I E; 13C-)L_c-3 i::�k CH I CA / F'EAF:CE I C3NC-3 TEEM NO F'F�O13 CT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE of� SATURATION 4 8'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL -7£3--a2 CRITICAL_ E/W VOL e34 CR I T I CAL SUM �3 63. LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I.._01Nt= MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH Mi, WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 105.. 0 RT. I5. 0 RTL 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 L. . 12. C) T. . 12. C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 1-n. C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEF T 4C) 65 15C25 THRU 1 160 2010 J 5 RIGHT 40 260 6)0 45 TRUCF::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEA- --': HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUNI) 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 1 WESTBOUND 5 31 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER: TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 599 782 84 57 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECf.-:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 4C) 65 15C) � AD,*JUST'ED VOL C) C) 15 C) CAPACITY C) 18' 27 C) MOVEMENT OK: Oh:: OK. OF:: 51( ' P,ink FR E;C3 tq E3 E-C F:;: 1 11,11 F=_I:R C3 F=1= Cl'F;: I -IF I C�o2b L_ ��%,,P FEE rl F_:-Iq-I- ��,J ink L_'Y c-3 1 4�3 EEC C3 L_E3 0:4 1 C--42�h / F='[=—44 FR(--E—= 1 C3 I%i C-3 -F I=—1=<M r-="F-="L_ I P4_1F (INCLUDES BOLSA CHKCA) DATE: 9/9/87 � ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE df4 SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL C3-7-c:], CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM c;l c)15 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. 12. 0 . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' 4 . . ' . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' . 6 ' . ' . . ' ' . . . . ' ' ' . ' . ' ' ' . ' ' . . ' . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 110 150 25 THRU 1240 2120 5 5 RIGHT 40 260 60 75 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 639 820 84 85 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 40 110 150 25 ADJUSTED VOL V 0 15 0 CAPACITY 0 181 0 1 MOVEMENT OK OK NO OK � ��~�� | F'AF-<SCIrVs E-4R I MCI-:-=EF::;:HCIF"F" CF: I "T- I CAI— MC)%.l FEE r•lEttl-IF AINIALYS I S E=c(-3L.SA CH I CA / F'EAFRCE I C3 tQC3 TF•FRM ink 1_T _ 1 (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE dfa SATURAT I ON tJ CJI CRITICAL N/S VOL t3 I- cS CRITICAL E/W VOL �3 t5 CRITICAL SUM Ste'cl, _t -��•�••�x#�t•�•�••��••��•�•�•��•��sae•�•-��•*�•��••��•�•�••�-�•�•� LANE GEOMETRY NORTHB0Ur,ID SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 1�. C) R I L_ 1Er. C) RTL 15. 0 T. 1�. 0 T. . 1 . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T. . 121'. C> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 1'. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 1 C)_5 THRU 12 C) 211 1 C) J 5 RIGHT 40 260 60 75 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAk:. HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 ._1 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 ti 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 634 816 84 85 LEFT C) 0 �� 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 4C) 1 C>5 15C� 5 ADJUSTED VOL C) C) CAPACITY U 18 C> 1 MOVEMENT OK Ok=: NO OF:: 5� ` P"44 FzZ E3 C3 P4 c-3 Ec F=< I M C�U:::a:F-<"C:)F=-F=- �F_,C I _T_ I f_-i!nkL_ ��[_=�M F-=M-IF ��C-�I Ne S3 1 �� ' E-C C3 t-C-3 4N C� I C-,dc% " F='E-=dc%Fr<(--E= I C3 t\J C-3 _F FEE F;:r-1 i!::�I -F � � (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE dc� SATURATION _j,�� CRITICAL N/S VOL E3 Cl:E3 CRITICAL E/W VOL E3-4 CRITICAL SUM :E3�� ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . ^ . . . ' . 3 L. . 12' 0 T. . 12' 0 . . . ' . . . . . ~ . . . ' 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . ' . . ' . . . ' ' 5 . . . . . . ' . ' . ' ' . ' . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . 6 . . . ' ' ' . . . . . . ' . ' ' ' . . . . . . ' . . ' . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 95 150 25 THRU 1215 2085 5 5 RIGHT 40 260 60 65 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 626 808 84 76 LEFT 0 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 40 95 150 25 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 15 0 CAPACITY 0 182 8 0 ) MOVEMENT OK OK NO OK ) �� x | P"dnk FZ E3 C3 PA E3 E-4 F::;: I P4(--V=::F_=F=;:"C3 F=F= | �F;: I _r I C_- L_ M C3%,,,'EE M E_=M_T_ dck PA dnb I 'Y E; I E; ' U;C3 L_S3 dnk I C�ink Z G-7 I L__ 1'%,l E_=ock F-Z -IF[—=F::z m r-li C3 P"F;: 0 F—=C:�_r DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE C:� SATURATION Z It?x_ CRITICAL N/S VOL KVQR�25 CRITICAL E/W VOL JL CRITICAL SUM 1 �2:��41_�> ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15' 0 RT. 15' 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 3 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12' 0 L. ' 12' 0 . ' . . . . . . . ' . . ' . 5 . ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' . . . . . . . ' . . . 6 . . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' ' ' . ' ' . . . . ' . . . . . ' . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 143 257 235 140 THRU 710 1290 357 334 RIGHT 106 456 58 145 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 95 WESTBOUND 5 3 . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 298 625 220 381 . LEFT 53 246 220 11 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 143 257 235 140 ADJUSTED VOL 53 246 220 11 CAPACITY 0 380 0 381 / MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OK ��»� � � � F--'C-%F::;:SC3"!E ECFi I NC1-<e:F;:H[:)F=-F7 iCF;: I T I Cal— 1'-1C WE-='tYlEt"I-IF dC�t%-94-lLY r I E E-CC3L_c-3 A CH I CA l HE 11_ t\tEAF;: T FEE 1=•:t'-'1 W / F'RC3 J EC-IF DATE: 9/9/07 LEVEL OF SERVICE C: SATURATION ''IS f CRITICAL N/S VOL fw ES 8 CRITICAL E/W VOL 63.C31 CRITICAL SUM 1 ^!ff!;C' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT . 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 162 257 235 140 THRU 767 1080 057 334 RIGHT 106 456 92 145 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND S _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT we 658 237 381 LEFT 179 246 220 11 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 162 257 215 140 ADJUSTED VOL 179 246 220 11 CAPACITY 0 519 364 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A UE:: 59 I='AF=ZSOIVS EiF-C I I�ICF EEH00=I= CF: I T I CAL_ MCltil FEE MEPJ_r" AtVAL_'YS I S E�ciCpL_EA C'H I CA / HE I L— IyEAF:;: -rEl=•:M ISO P'RCI.J ECT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 51 10 f CRITICAL N/S VOL_ li "fl- CRITICAL E/W VOL ei<> CRITICAL SUM 1 :2 tf; es LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTL-OUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH i RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 .4 L. . 12., 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J r. TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 145 255 235 140 THRU 765 1370 355 305 RIGHT 105 455 60 145 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 3 . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . U - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS � CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 317 654 220 382 LEFT 66 243 220 11 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 145 255 205 140 ADJUSTED VOL 66 24:' 220 11 CAPACITY > 40' 382 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OF:: Cp d 1=� F-<E3 C)r%J E3 ID F-z I F\J(--U<EE F-<"C3 F=F= �FR I -r- I C�441 M C3 M E:1,i-r �N I",,l iC4 L_',e!E3 1 !E3 E-C C:)I <,E;4--h I (__dC� E—= I L_ F%4 E=_:df:�k F=;: -I-1�_=F;z M W Z F�*F:;:C3 0 FE C�_F � (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE C:� SATURATION 27E3011- CRITICAL N/S VOL �� CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM 1 .:2 E3 C:3;1 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 3 T. . 12. 0 T' . 12' 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L' ' 12' 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 5 ' . ' . ' . . ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . . ' . . 6 . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' . . . . ' . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES � � NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 165 255 235 140 THRU 820 1460 355 335 RIGHT 105 455 95 145 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 95 WESTBOUND 5 3 . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 337 687 238 382 LEFT 198 243 220 11 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 165 255 235 140 ADJUSTED VOL 198 243 220 11 CAPACITY 0 548 0 364 | MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OK b� � F'AF:;:CC]IVS E{F=< I MCI:::EF:;:HC:)FF CFC I T I CAI MC39..f0=h'lE=-hl_1F fchhJALL%Y'S I c-3 L-cC3I E3 I A / H0= I i_ 1—C:)IVC3 -IF liFR1" 1 C3 F'F:C30 ECT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F SATURATION 1dlE3 CRITICAL N/S VOL I I C_a I CRITICAL E/W VOL 16 E3 CRITICAL SUM I T1-3<4 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 4 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 192 .305 279 166 THRU 911 169 424 =97 RIGHT 126 542 109 172 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ 1 SOUTHBOUND _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 :71 1 WESTBOUND 5 = 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 359 742 267 428 LEFT 359 286 257 65 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 192 305 279 166 ADJUSTED VOL 359 286 257 65 CAPACITY Cf 742 O 418 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A Of`: �A F::* FiSCOQNS EiF� I IqC hFzfEF-<I-IOFE I T 1" C44L_ M(D�'EMEM-IF Ah1AL-YE3 I S EiCIL,c----;A Hl 1 E I L L_h!G -I FZM N1C3 F'O=.:0,1 t4 f M I _l DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE n SATUR""TION E3 E3 CRITICAL_ N/S VOL c?C,- - CRITICAL E/W VOL 41-11=D CRITICAL SUM I _q__%- I- LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R'T. IS. C) RT. 1 0 RT. 15. C ? T. T. . 12). C) T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. ii T. . 4 L. . 12. C) L. . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 19'' .'c`_�S _ 9 166 THRU 911 16:_7•;9 424 397 RIGHT 1'w6 542 109 172 TRUCI<::S ( ) LOCAL BUSES (#/HF;) PEAF:; HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND S _ 1 SOUTHBOUND _ 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 3 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH I 8C_) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —FIGHT .359 742 267 283 LEFT 162 286 257 65 LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOU'TFABOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 192 ) 279 166 ADJUSTED VOL 162 22 86 2 5j7 65 CAPACITY i 742 49 '273 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OF::: / ? P•AF:;:EOhlE E;R I MCCF::FEE-F;:"C3 FE CR I T I CAL MC_ W E7_M 1=M-1F AhAAL`.'E I S lEcC3l_SA CF-1 I CA J Q-9E I C- 1-OiVE TEAM AIF='F=•L I CA�iT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F= SATURATION I I +s% CRITICAL_ N/S VOL_ I ::2:2H!9 CRITICAL E/W VOL tS£3405=� CRITICAL SUM _t S' _L. �{..�..i(..�.3%.lE iF'Tt'#'�'jc}T"p";E"IE#-�T'IC is ic#T'�F iF�f'#�,`?�E##�E'��E•�E LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 F.T. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 2 05 017 279 171 THRU 999 1772 426 398 RIGHT 177. 542 128 IGO TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND `; _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _y 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . G - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 391 788 277 429 LEFT 441 299 257 75 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 205 017 279 171 ADJUSTED VOL 441 299 257 75 CAPACITY 0 e5B 409 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OF..: ( y F'AFRc-3OtVS E-9FR I h4C1- EF:ZHOF:::-F CFti I T I CAL- MC) ,.PE-=MEPV-F AhIAL_YS I F_�C1L_Sink CH I CA / HE I L LOhJG TF=;:m k F'L_f__rg-IF W / M I T DATE: 9/9/37 LEVEL OF SERVICE I SATURATION E3 1 CRITICAL N/S VOL CEO^ CRITICAL E/W VOL A `: CRITICAL SUM I Zl-C I-7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EA aTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R-r. 15. 0 R. . 1-. �� RT. 15. 0 RT. 1`. . C) T. . 12. 0 T. . 1 ', C-) T. . 12. T. . 12. 0 T. . 1 '. �� T. . 12. i� L. . 12. C) L.. . 12. i) 4 L. 12. (:) T. . 1'?. (> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 3 17 7`": 171 THRU 999 1772L 426 3.90 RIGHT 1 542 1 oo I SO TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 391 686 277 288 LEFT 176 299 257 75 LEFT TURN CHECf. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 171 ADJUSTED VOL 176 299 257 75 CAPACITY i) 8'8 64 268 MOVEMENT" N/A N/A N/A 01: 6S F='AFZc- CMLVC EtF;: I hlCi-=:EF:"CIF=F= CFti I T I CAL I-1CIVEME=-:P1T A1-#ink L-YSa I S )l=-c1=)L,�__►- I CA l HE I L_ L-ClhlC TEF:;:M AL_T _ I DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF `;ERVICE F= SATURATION 1 1 :5 CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 �22 1 C CRITICAL_ E/W VOL er�£B6 CRITICAL- SUM 1 ma's='-1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTI IBOUh1D SOUTHBOUr•.ID E TBOLIND WE sTG'OUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. i.�;. C� R f. 10. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 2 T. . 11. C) T. . 1,2. C) T. 1�. - T. . T. . 12. 0F . . 1 1 4 L. . I__. (:) L. . 1 :. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFF- IC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEF-I'* _i4 :T 1 6 '279 171 THRU 991 1760 426 :7.96 RIGHT 1?? 542 1 '6 i79 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL FUSES (#/HR) PEAk: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND _7 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . U - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 389 784 276 429 LEFT 434 293 257 75 LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUfHBOL.JND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 2()4 ?16 279 171 ADJUSTED VOL4'4 2 98 257 75 CAPACITY C) 829 0 41 C l MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OK 6 � � ` P'dck F-,<E;C3 t\J E3 Et F:,-: I P-1 C�P---r=-FR"C3 F=-F= �F-,< I _F I C_-dc�L_ M C3 W I—=M E=t%4-I- ink P4 onk L-'%e�3 1 S3 E�c C)L_c-:3 df:4 C_- I onk I I C3 t\J C-3 -F FR M L_-IF - I w ri I _r DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE 1E) SATURATION E3EJQ/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL E3E>�� CRITICAL E/W VOL E>21_24 CRITICAL SUM 1 -4 1 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. ' 12' 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 2 T' ' 12. 0 T. ' 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 3 T. . 12. 0 T. ' 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. ' 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 T' ' 12' 0 . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . 6 ' ' . . . . ' . . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 204 316 279 171 THRU 991 1760 426 398 RIGHT 133 542 126 179 . ' TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 4' BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 389 682 276 287 LEFT 175 298 257 75 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 204 316 279 171 ADJUSTED VOL 175 298 257 75 CAPACITY 0 829 64 268 | MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK | � ^� � � F='jc�hF:;:SC]hIS E- Fti I hlC:�l<EFRHC)F=F= C:FR I T I C_—AL— rlC:)VEM E:P4_F AhJoc�L_YE; IE; 1--cC3L__SA CH I C_—A / HE I L L_OQVC -IF EF:;zM ,AL_T _ DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F= SATURATION I I f CRITICAL N/S VOL _L A 9 CRITICAL_ E/W VOL 6eS CRITICAL SUM 1 E3-7' LANE GEOMETRY NOR"f HBLJUND SOUTHBOUND E'ASTE OU�ID WESTBOUND I_ NE MOV W I DTH NOV WIDTH NOV W I DTH NOV W I Dl"H ]. RT. 1�. C? RT. 15. i� RT. 15. 0 R. 1:. i� ? T. . 1 . i; T. . 1:. 0 T. 1 T. 12. ii _. T. . 1�. �� T. . 1�. 0 L. . 12. C L. 12. C) 4 L. . 12. C-) L. . 12. (-� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT �'r i 1 1 '79 1 IC THRU 971 17,30 425 399 RIGHT 1_31 542 122 178 TRUCk'.S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 381 774 274 429 LEFT 415 295 257 73 LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT '•.%OLUME 201 1? 279 17C ADJUSTED VOL 415 295 257 7' CAPACITY C) 8c)o i) 412 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OK � g F'AIF:E3ClhJS E-4FR I NC::,' EF;:HClF= F= CF-C I T I CAI_ h'1C1k.,'EMEINJT- AIhJ44L_Yc� I S 1-9CIL_SA C'H I C:A / HE I I_ 1 13 tq C3 TFiZM AL-T" _ !:2 w / M I T DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE ]ID SATURATION C-4 CRITICAL N/S VOL C-41 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL _�-I- CRITICAL SUM 1 - C LANE GEOMETRY NOR 'HBOLJI'lD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1`,. C> R. . 1^. �� RT. 1�;. C> RT. 15. 0 T. 12. 0 T. . 1 . C) T. . 12. C) _ T. . T. . 12. G L. . 1 '. 0 L. . 1?. C) L. . 121. 0 T. . 12. Ci . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12). 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT �'��i 1� ^79 17C� THRU 971 1730 425 31198 RIGHT 131 54 122 178 TRUCF:.S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND _ 1 WESTBOUND _ 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH e0 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 381 670 274 287 LEFT 171 95 257 73 LEFT TURN CHECF: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME '2C)1 71.7. 279 170 ADJUSTED VOL_ 171 C95 ^57 73 CAPAC I TY CG 808 6CU 270 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A Ok: 6 1 ' I='ink F=<E3 C3 tq E; n F7< I P4 C�Vz__FE FR C3 F=-F=- C�F< I -IF 1 4-- L_ M C3%�l I=—M E:P4_T_ onk r-4 4N L_Ne!E; I �S ' n C3 I.—E3 ink I C�om� E= I L_ ��C-3 -F E=_:F=<M tq C3 F='F:R C3�J 1=C�_V (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE F= SATURATION -1 1 ��'%_ CRITICAL N/S VOL :1 :24-5C-36 CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM C�� ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T' . 12. 0 T. ' 12' 0 T' . 12. 0 T. ' 12. 0 3 T' . 12. 0 T. ' 12. 0 L. ' 12' 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. ' 12' 0 L. ' 12' 0 . . . . ' . . ' . . ' . ' . 5 ' . ' . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . ' . . ' ' ' . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 195 305 280 165 THRU 1125 2015 45 395 2 RIGHT 125 540 115 170 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 433 872 270 426 LEFT 378 286 259 63 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 195 30 5 280 165 ADJUSTED VOL 378 286 259 63 | CAPACITY 0 817 0 415 � MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OK � 70 F'AF;:SONS E{F;: I" r%J _EF;:"C31=F" CF: I _T_ I Cfc LI MiOVEMENT fnbN ink l_IV,S I S E-CC3L_._.S C�H I A / Hl- I L_ L__N(E; _Fr-<M NO F'Fi(3J tAJ / M I Y" (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/ /87 LEVEL OF SERVICE L7 SATURAT I OIJ t? CRITICAL_ N/S VOL �4 CRITICAL E/W VOL t5j4c_' CRITICAL SUM I4:1_3ts LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT I 5 305 2B0 165 THRU 1 125 2015 425 395 RIGHT 125 540 115 170 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 31 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 433 790 270 281 LEFT 165 286 259 63 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 195 305 290 165 ADJUSTED VOL 165 286 259 63 CAPACITY 818 52 270 MOVEMENT" N/A N/A N/A OK 71 F•AFtiSOt,,iS E-tF:;: I t�,lCV=EF:HOEE CFt I T I CAL M C3 WE:MEhJT ARJ ink L—YE3 I E3 F- C)L_E3 CH I CA / HE I L._ L_OhIC TEF=;:1`7 AF=•F•L_ I CANT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/37 LEVEL. OF SERVICE IF SATURATION I :2!6 7G CRITICAL N/S VOL I CRITICAL E/W VOL KV C CRITICAL SUM ^{=3-7!ff!; LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 _ T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 cF L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 210 315 280 170 THRU 1215 2150 425 195 RIGHT 13 o 540 135 180 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 .. 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 465 918 2eO 426 LEFT 472 297 259 73 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 210 015 280 170 ADJUSTED VOL 472 297 259 73 CAPACITY 0 925 0 405 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A Ok:: 7,�2. F'AF:7<SONE; 13F;: I hICF==EF;:HCrF=-F" C—_F;Z I T I CAL_ MCItlEMO=P4-IF AP%.IAL_YS I E3 ECCILSA CH I CA / "F= I L L—PVG TEEM ink F'L._Ch•IT W (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL. OF SERVICE L7 SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL 4 CRITICAL SUM 114--7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND S0UTh(BOUND EAS"F E'C"iUND WE::S rBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV W I DTH MOV W I D l-H MOV W I D l"H 1. F.T. 15. R. . 1'. i) RT, i.5, i� RT. 1`;. ii T. . T. . 1 T. . 1 i� T. . T. . 12. C) L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. ci 4 L. . T. . 12. C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12. 0 L. . 12. i) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 21 = 1 o(_) 170 THRU 425 395 RIGHT 130 540 135 180 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 465 e32 28(--) 286 LEFT 95 2.97 259 73 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 21�� 1 S 28o(-_) 17C ADJUSTED VOL 181 297 259 7_ CAPACITY i) 925 67 ` 65 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK: 7-3 0=•A 1=;�c-3 C3 P4 S F- R I N C:F =E FR"C10=1= C F:;: I _F I CAL_ r-1C1tiJEMEh•l-IF AiVAL_YS I S E.cC1L_CA C7-1 I CA f F-1E I L_ L_C "(.3 -IF EF=ZM AILT _ 1 (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION I �-l- CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 _Z t5-e1` CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM e=IZ-=? LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOOTHE{OUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LF;NE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1`j. C) RT•. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 1 . 0 1 RT. 2 T. . 1'?. C T. . 112. C T. . 12. Ci T. . 12. ii T. . T. . L. . 12.. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEF I .•'C)� 15 oU 171) THRU 1:L 1 0� ^1:'S 425 _�95 RIGHT 1.3c) 540 1 �� 175 TRUCKS ('.:) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND `, _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 3 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 3 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 462 913 277 426 LEFT 441 297 259 73 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 170 ADJUSTED VOL 441. 297 259 73 CAPAC I Ty C) 892 C) 4��8 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A Ok:: 7Y F'ARS3OtVS EiFR I NCh=:�ERHOFF CF: I T I GAI_ MQ`JEMEhIT F�t"I4NLYS I E3 =-cC11_Sink CH I CA L_C3rgC3 TRM ink LT _ 1 W / m I T (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE ID SATURATION 8'9 CRITICAL N/S VOL 9I l=3 CRITICAL E/W VOL Cam-4 CRITICAL SUIh 1 Z4� 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOLI-ri- DOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE_ MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 F;T. 15. 0 R. . 12,. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 121. C) T. . 12. 0 T. . 1'?. C) T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. (-) L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12). G T. . 121. C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 17(__) THRU 4215 _95 RIGHT 1 U 54C) 1'C) 175 TRUCKS ('!.) LOCAL LOUSES (#/HR) PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 OUTHBOUND = 1 EASTBOUND 5 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8(--) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 462 826 277 284 LEFT 92 297 259 7 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME .2>5 -_:I1 J 28C� 17C ADJUSTED VOL 176 29' 259 7 CAPACITY O 892 66 266 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A 0k:: 75 0='AF;SC7tVS €cF: I hICF-=:EF:HC31=E CF: I T I (--AL_ 1`1C]R,JErl17-tVT AIV441_YS I S E 3c3L—S4N CH I CA / HE 1" 1, L_C:)1l.1C TEF:m AL_T _ 176 (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE 1= SATURATION I CRITICAL N/S VOL I =_.-4 4 CRITICAL E/W VOL KV 3`tts CRITICAL SUM sp<519 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L.. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 205 315 280 170 ) THRU 1 18S 2105 425 395 RIGHT 130 540 130 175 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUNI) 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 455 907. 277 426 LEFT 441 297 259 73 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 205 015 200 170 ADJUSTED VOL_ 441 297 259 7 CAPACITY i 889 0 408 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OF:: 7 F•AF;:E3C:)hJE; E4 F;: I thJC:F=-=EF:-<HCIFF:::- CR I T I L MCVJ-MEhJT ff�nldc4 _�S I E3 Ec CI L_ C H I C o= I L_ I_Cp I%J C-C -T-F2 M d!2%I_T (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE Ln SATURATION C C:ry CRITICAL N/S VOL {?Cpt0m. CRITICAL_ E/W VOL tvz == CRITICAL. SUM IL �--4 S� LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L_r-iNP. MOV W I DTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV W I D T H 1 R-r. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12 ) T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 205 315 280 17�� THRU 1163 2105 425 395 RIGHT 13�� 540 130 175 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 1 EASTBOUND 5 = 1 WESTBOUND 5 = 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH eo SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 455 814 277 284 LEFT 92 297 259 73 LEFT TURN CHECK.' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 205 015 280 170 ADJUSTED VOL 176 297 259 7? CAPACITY 0 889 66 266 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK:: 77 CF-< I -IF I iCdc�t_ MC3V FEE MEt',l AhIF:�,I—`ems I S GF:-< t•l �3_' / t-It= I L AVE tVt`AF=. TEAM h10 F•F=<Q.7 CT" DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE C-'!h SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL - 6 CRITICAL SUM f,?'^ LANE GEOMETRY NORTHDOi_1ND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ]. RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. () RT. 1`�. C� RT. 1''. LT. 12.1. C LT. 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 117 = _ tl6 51 24 THRU 2'C� i� 502 480 RIGHT 52 97 118 3.4 TRUCKS i%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 291 346 •_,26 273 LEFT 0 0 C) o LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUNI) WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1 1= _ _ SEA �1 ADJUSTED VOL O 0 C) 0 CAPACITY MOVEMENT OF:: OF•:: OE'; Of:. 71 P,iniFRSC7I�IS EiF;: I I-ICU:::EFRHCl1=E CVO I T I CAI_ mC3V1_=mEhJT !Mk I-NJAI_'YS I S C==;I�:A1-Iick E; f F-IE I i_ AVIE tqI-= I=< TEF=-<I„1 W ! P•EO0 ECT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL .S CRITICAL SUM 63--7 E3 LAANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUN-1 k SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOI,' W I I) f H MOV W:I DTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. C.) RT. 1.5. �> RT. 1.5. 0 RT. 15. C) L. . '1:_'. :� L. . 1?. �� L_T. 12. ) LT. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUME: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT" 11. 56 51 THRU = 446 li _ 48� RIGHT 52 97 119 .34 TRUCF`:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEA[::* HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ . 95 SOULHBOUND `� _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . U - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 294 352 326 273 LEFT C) 0 i) 0 LEFT TURN CHECk: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 113 _ _ 56 51 ADJUSTED VOL i) C) c_) C) CAPACITY 0 58 5' i) MOVEMENT Ok:: Ok:: OFF:: OE:: 79 F'AF:E;C t\JS 1:-:�Fi I PQCF _I:F:F-JCIFF CF: I T I CAL_ MC %/E=_:MEN-IF AhAAI_YS I E; CF=;:AHOnkM 4-:E;T / F-OJ= I L_ F_:_ NEAF: TC_F:M hJCM F'F_<C ,J CT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE_ A SATURATION 37"f_ CRITICAL N/S VOL =-4-q- CRITICAL E/W VOL �' eS CRITICAL SUM eS 3 't=31 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i. F:T. 15. 0 RT. i.5. �� F.T. 15. 0 RT. 15. C) 2 L. . 1. '. L.. . 1�'. C) LT. 1 . 0 L.T. 1�. C� 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C 6 . . . . . ,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 11 J "J 55 CJC THRU ^=C) 224C) 5C)C) 480 RIGHT OC 95 1 20 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH Bo SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 289 344 326 273 LEFT 0 C) C) 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1 15 .35 55 5C� ADJUSTED VOL C CAPACITY MOVEMENT Ok:: Ok:: Oh:: Ov" Sa F•AF:E3QhJS E-9F: I NC! 1=F--<"ODFF' iCFR I _F I CAL_ lY9C3'.lEM FEE 1-IT fch1NlALYS I C3F;: AM E;T / "E-= I L AVIE ItiIEAR TEF;:M W f 1='F<C30 ECT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE A. SATURATION £ CRITICAL N/S VOL :4 S' CRITICAL E/W VOL �c�1 CRITICAL SUM 6->-7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EA:3TD.0UND WESTBOUND LANE MO'',! WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 10. ( R Q L. . 12. 0 L. . lam. C) LT. 1' . C) LT. 12. U 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LJ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1 1 S _5 .JJ 5l) THRU 2_3,0 245 li A) 4c9� RIGHT 50 95 12C� T J TRUCI-` (%) LOCAL BUSES (#k/HR) PEAF`. HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 = . 95 EASTBOUND 5 . 9r WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 294 349 326 273+ LEFT C) 0 C) LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 115 35 55 5t> ADJUSTED VOL C) 0 CAPACITY 0 55 5' C) MOVEMENT Ok:: 0k CW` O ! F'ARSOitVs nF� I tgCCU:::EF::;:"OF-F C�.F'. I T I CA1_ MClVEMEtVT AIVA1_'le S I S C-3F:AI--iAM 41�3-IF / t-iE I L AVE t_OtVG T1=F:M 9Vai F' QaCT DATE: 9/9/97 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL 9-q- CRITICAL E/W VOL 4!!�>-7 CRITICAL SUM - b 1 LANE GEOMETRY NOIRTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTI={OUND WES"fBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WID-rH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. C) RT. 15. �� RT. 15. (- F:T. 15. �� L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 LT. 12. LT. 1C. C) 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1_4 - 9 b 7 61 THRI� 2 77 �'9C 59b l570 i RIGHT 62 1 15 140 4�� TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND _ i EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8C) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 3 ) 394 367 306 LEFT 0 C) 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECF--' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 134 =9 b7 61 ADJUSTED VOL C) C) C) CAF'A41 Ty 0 64 61 0 MOVEMENT OF; Ok': Ok: OK O F'AF-<SCINS Eck I NCI- EF-C"Q1=1F= CF;: I T I CAL_ MC3 V EMEN'T" ANAILYS I E3 CFAH ink M ST / HE I L_ A'VI✓ L_C7NG TF—= 1=<m Al='F'L_ I CANT DATE: 9/9/87 ####•lEli•###############�f•�(######if#•lE## i LEVEL OF SERVICE: A SATURATION % CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL tC CRITICAL SUM 7: 9 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOLITHDOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1 . �) RT. l.c. �� RT. l.`. ii RT. 15. C� L. . ice. C) L_. . 12. C) LT. 1'�. Ci LT. 1 . C� 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1.�6 =;9 69 61 THRU 281 296 617 601 RIGHT 62'' lie 142 40 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 334 401 •_�78 =�?L LEFT 2 0 C) c_) LEFT TURN CHECk:'. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND IPJF'UT VOLUME 1'6 ?9 69 61 ADJUSTED VOL c i C) C i CAPACITY C) 67 56 U MOVEMENT NO Ok:: OE::: OE':. 83 F'dc�F:SC7NS E-9F: I NCO 1—=F:HC3O`F COF: I T I C441— mC3VEmEPli-T jc�l"l ink L--Nil,E3 I S C317 A H A hfi S3-T," I H E I I E I—C3 P11 CEIF T c:1=<m L -r _ I DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE df4 SATL.JRAT I ON -4__ CRITICAL N/S V 0 L 4t=11 I CRITICAL E/W VOL CR I T I CAL_ SUM J ET LANE GEOMETRY h,IOR'THF:,'OL.1N1) SOUTHBOUND EASTF-*�CiL!ND WESTBOUND LANE MOV W T DT H MOV W I UTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 F:"i. lu . �� RT. 15. �� RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. C) L. . Ll Ll A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT" 136 ?9 69 61 THRU r80 296 615 599 RIGHT 62 lie 142� 40 TRUCF::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF::: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 1 EASTBOUND _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . o — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8C> SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 333 401 377 321 LEFT L 0 i> 0 LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 136 -9 69 61 ADJUSTED VOL 0 C) 0 CAPACITY C) 66 56 C) MOVEMENT NO OF:: Ok:: Ok:: 91 Cam: I I- I Cdc�I— M0V FEE M FEE 1V-IF 44hJAI_YE3 I S Er-7< IAM ST / F-iE I I SAVE L_OtNJC3 -F-EF:ZM A1_T _ D()TE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE dc1 SATURATION __ CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL -":-7-1- CRITICAL SUM -7F. LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EA^TB0L.JND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1.5. 0 RT. ].u. c) RT. 15. ii RT. 15. C� LT. 12. 0 LT. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1- 5 ?9 b8 61 THRCJ 610 59 RIGHT 622 117 141 40 TRUCE:::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK. HOUR FACTOR NOR"f'Hn0UND SOl_1THc+0UtlD 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 1 WESTBOUND 5 •�1 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8o SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 333 399 374 317 LEFT 0 O i) C) LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1'S '9 68 61 ADJUSTED VOL ii i) CAPACITY 66 i MOVEMENT cW*., Ok:: Ok: 0F:: 95 F•AF;�ahJE3 IDF: I NCt-=:EFt"C3F=-F" C✓F; I T I CAL_ MQ4f1=-:MEhJ-IF dc�hJAL-YE; I S G1=�At-9A L_ AVM L_OhJ(23 TEF;M i40 F'F:C)0 (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE A SATURATION -4^'/.. CRITICAL N/S VOL _=4=,,;o- CRITICAL E/W VOL -=':eS6 CRITICAL SUM "7't5(3 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EA TE0LiND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 R-f. 1'. 0 RT. 15. C) RT. 15. i) RT. 1S. L. 1?. C) L. 1'�. (- LT. 1: '. i) LT. 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTI-iL-(OUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1.35 65. 6� THRU 2715 290 5915 570 RIGHT 60 11 S 14C-) 40 TRUCES (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND S 1 EASTBOUND S _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8o? SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 326 .392 366 306 LEFT c_) i i� i� LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME i.3S 4C) 6S 60 ADJUSTED VOL. i) O i CAPAC 1 TY i) 66 60 MOVEMENT OF::: OF:: OF::: Ok: O �p F'AF=iSGh1S ]Est I P4Gh=-=EF;:"C3FF CFR I _F T GAI— t-lC3 ,llEt'-' E:M_1F ink IlJAI—YE; I S (�3 F::;:ink I-94'-%M GT / I L_ Ati..•'E=-: I_OhIG 1f-EF:;zM AP'r-='L_ I Gink hBT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURAT ION CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM 7_7 C3 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND L_F=ANC_ NOV WIDTH NOV W I DTH MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. ].�,. �� RT. 1C. () RT. ic. �_� RT. 15. 0 L. . 12. i) LT. 12. LT. 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1 T` 4�> oC 6� I-HRU 28t) 295 6115 600 RIGHT 60 11.20 140 4C) TRUCKS (%? LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 311 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT ._•311 402. 7,76 321 LEFT G 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1'S 40 65 60 ADJUSTED VOL_ i) ci i) o CAPACITY C) 71 JJ MOVEMENT OF: OF:: OP:* OK u D7 1=•AFZSCItiIS EcFR I I�JCF:-_EFtiH00=F CFI I T I CAL— MCV FEE MEhIT I S (EC AHAM c,_3T / HE I L._ ink L,QhIC TE F<M AL_T _ I (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE_ A SATURATION is CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL =:_•z► CRITICAL SUM -7-7C LANE GEOMETRY N0Fr:THI0LJND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 FCT. 15. C) RT. 1`5.. C) RT. 151. C) RT. 15. 0 L. 1,2. 0 LT LT. 12. (--) 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1 _5 40 THRU 280 29 J 6115 6o0 RIGHT 6C_) 120 140 40 TRUCI:.S (%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND _ 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT :7.31 402 376 321 LEFT ) 0 (J 0 LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1?c 40 65 60 ADJUSTED VOL i) i) i CAPACITY i) 71 JJ MOVEMENT OFF, OK: OI.:: OK. V F'ARE3C71-,IS €�R I PJGh _ERHGFF GR I I— I GAL MC:)L10=1-11=1VT AINJAI_YS; I S GF;zAHA1'''1 E3—T / HE I L_ AtilF I_OhIG q—ERM A1—T _ (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE A SATURAT I ON 4=' CRITICAL N/S VOL ==-9-7 CRITICAL E/W VOL = _7'-1- CRITICAL_ SUM -7-' 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND Er-;STB'0UN1) WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH I'fIOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. i.`,. �� RT. 1�. �� RT. 15. �� RT. 15. i) a_ L. 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 LT. 12. 0 LT. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOL_UMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT* 1 40 65 60 THRU 28C) 295 610 590 RI GHT 60 115. 140 40 TRUCk;S ('!.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAk: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUL HBOUtID 5 = 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 331 397 374 316 LEFT c i i) 0 LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUI'IE 1 4C 65 60 ADJUSTED VOL 0 0 0 0 CAPACITY ii 66 58 MOVEMENT OF:: OF::: 0F..:: OK. 99 1='AF:SOhJS E-CF;: I t\J t`-F=F-Z C3 F=F I--F: I T I CALL_ 1-1C3k PF=ME_t`JT ANAL-YS I S W EtV FEE R gc% E / GIRA"onkM tV1=0 1FR TEF;:M hJ0 F'F;:0,J ECT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE Ei SATURATION 4!T�—7 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL .St CRITICAL SUM 1 l t__p4 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND DOUTHBOUND EAs-rBOL!N1) WES_'TBOUND LAI',lE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1. RT. 15. 0 RT. iS. C) RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 T. . 12. C) L. . 12. (? T. . 12. T. . 12. C L. . 1�. ci . . . . . . . T. . 12. C) L. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12'. V . . . . . . . G 6 . . . . . . . . . . ,, . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT '97 115 9' bo THRU 262 160 1391 1 C 109 R I GHT 101 89 219 82 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAf': HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 . 95 S0UTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 L . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 192 2158 5e3 6(--)4 LEFT 292 U C LEFT TURN CHECF-.:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 297 115 97 68 ADJUSTED VOL 292 C) C) C� CAPACITY U 58 C) 21 MOVEMENT N/A Ok:: Ok; OF.; 9D F'AFtiCONE3 EtR I NCt<-=FEE Fi"C)F=F CR I T" I CAL MC➢VIF MEN•T ANAL.YS I E t4 F::F NEF: AVE f C3F'< iAM NEAIF< TE1=;ZM t4 f F"'RO0 F=CT DATE: 9/9 7 #•IF•IE•�•#�E••lE#•iE••iE••!F•�••iE•#•iE#�•lE�•fit••#•�i•*•�F iF�••�••�•�E•�E•dE••�(•�E LEVEL-. OF SERVICE C SATURATION -7 =: CRITICAL N/S VOL J .6> CRITICAL E/W VOL 7c_}eS CRITICAL SUM 1 ^6 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND [:_AE;I DOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. Ili Q RT. I C) RT. 15. f) RT. 15. 0 2 T. . 1.': . fir L. . 12. C) T. . 12. i) T. . 12. i� L. . 12. �� . . . . . . . T. . L. . 121. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . . . . . . . . C 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT ::97 i. 1�, 1C�� 68 THRU 262 16(--) 1528 1264 RIGHT 1(�1 95 219 82 TRUCI::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND _ _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 192 264 6" 706 LEFT 292 i) 0 LEFT TURN CHECF-.: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 297 115 1 )c) 68 ADJUSTED VOL_ 292 r) i i i CAPACITY 364 C73 MOVEMENT N/A 0F:: Ok:: Of.:: �/ F'AF 13C)t\JE3 ]cF: I PA(--V=:EF;:"CiFF" CF: I T I (--dnkIL MCpVEM FEE hl_T_ A1-9AL_YS I" S 1 inhF:t',,tEF: TEF:M PlicD F'F:CI,J I=CT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 •�•�•�•�••�•�i•fit•�•iE��••1F�*#•#�E•#•)t•�E•�•�E•��E••�••iF•�•###•��F•# LEVEL_ OF SERVICE 11 SATURATION -7(11'/_ CRITICAL_ N/S VOL �5-eU 9 CRITICAL E/W VOL 4tL->E� I CRITICAL SUM 1 '_? 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ]. RT. 15. 0 RT. ].5. C) RT. ].5. C) RT. 15. 0 T. . i. . �) L. 1'. G T. . 1' . C� T. . 12. (? L. . i . �) . . . . . . . T. . L. . 12. C) 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12,. . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEF T '95 1 15 S'S 7C THRU .In 26C) 16C) 146C) 1 180 RIGHT 100 9ci ��) eo TRUCE::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk; HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . i) — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH eO SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 191 259 609 661 LEFT 290 i) i) c_) LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME �95 115 95 70 ADJUSTED VOL 29i) C) 0 0 CAPACITY c_) :1.58 0 52 MOVEMENT N/A OF::: Ok: OF::: 9a F'AF:SC7NS; €�F: I NCI :EF:"C)F0:F CF;: I T I CAI__ MC'JEr-1ENT ANAL_Y'S I *.�- WAF;NEF: A'�E / CF:AI--iAI''1 NEAP: TEF�h'1 W /' F'F:C].1 ECT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 7-7 l CRITICAL N/S VOL t5 f5 4 CRITICAL E/W VOL _ 4 CRITICAL SUM 1 1 LANE GEOMETRY P•10FTHE�L:II.IND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE. MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1 . U R7. 1�. �� RT. 15. C) R"f. 15. C 1?. �� 7. . 1:_'. C► T.. . 12. C� L. . 12. U . . . . . . . T. . 12.. 0 L. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEF-1 : 95 115 1 )C> 70 THRU 26C) 160 1595 1375 RIGHT 1 C) 95 80 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 915 WESTBOUND 5 _, . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 191 264 658 763 LEFT 290 C) i i LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 29�. 1 15 1 )C) 7C� ADJUSTED VOL 290 C) O CAPACITY U 3"63 C) 1 5 MOVEMENT N/A OF--:: OF`: Oh:: 93 F'aRE3C)tVS ]E�hti I t\j 1-:__EF;HC:)F1= I T I CAI_ mC3%lEmE=_PJT AtVALYS I S WAF`<tqEFC €c�'�E C3F:;: 4N M I_C1h8G TEF-<M t',10 1='F:C3 J ECT DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE= cc: SATURATION 7 E3 1 CRITICAL_ N/S VOL 1525 5 CRITICAL E/W 'VOL 7 I Z4- CR I T I CAL_ SUM I :^=-I- LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND CANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH I RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT" 353 137 119 91 THRU '1 1 190 1815 1501 RIGHT 120 1. Q� 260 97 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 ._. 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 :71 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 QPEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 60 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 216 296 714 554 LEFT 339 4 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 35 137 119 81 ADJUSTED VOL_ 339 4 CAPACITY 0 419 160 MOVEMENT N/A Ok:: OF`: 0k:: 9� F'AFtiSCIh.lS EiFR I hJCh:-:EF;:"CpEF C:F-Z I T I CAI- MI3tiJEME=_t%J_'r AtVAL_"r'S I S tJAFRV4e:F:. AVEIC3F:.At-IAM L_C V4C9 3 T1=t---<1-1 AI='F'L_ I CrAtV_T DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE ID SATURATION E3=l CRITICAL N/S VOL ---':S� CRITICAL E/W VOL_ -74!S i CRITICAL SUM I -I-t 34� 3f•#•+e#•###�f•#####•ic#k-k#+`►xx�c#•ii••i:•#r:�i#• •#i•�%••ii ic�ii••s`c LANE GEOMEI-RY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOLIND E A S TBOLJND WESTL-3OUNI) LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. i) RT. 1 . i) RL . 15. 0 R-r. 1 V T. . 1'?. 0 L. . 112. i) T. 1�. �> T. . 12. 0 _ L. . 1._'. �� . . . . . . . T. . 1?. �� T. . 1?. i� 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. 1,'. i) L. 12. (,) C' J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT =c= 1?9 1 81 THRU '11 190 1968 1 7�(-) RIGHT 12�� 117 260 99 TRUCh::S (%) LOCAL- BUSES (#/HR) F'EAF: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 = 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 216 0t) 767 634 LEFT 3L 9 8 i) LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHSOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 353 1_)9 1.23 81. ADJUSTED VOL_ '.79 8 i i CAPACITY i) 4= 1=? 0 MOVEMENT N/A 9S ' P"tc�F;:!E;L-3 1,,,J 1:3 E-9 F:;: I t,J C�1<:E—=F:;�"C3 F:::-F=- c�r--c I -I- I c�ink I— m C)v[—=m 1_=PQ_r ��ff2!k L_%e E; I S; ' W ink F=<t-4 F:;: oc% E_= C3 F:;:C-�"ini 11 ��,l CE; -I-FEE F;:M L__T_ JL DATE: 9/9/87 ********************************** LEVEL OF SERVICE 13 SATURATION E3=011_ CRITICAL N/S VOL IV7114_�;, CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM l -4 (_D:�2 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 3 L' . 12. 0 . . . . ' ' ' T. . 12. 0 T' ' 12' 0 4 . . . . . . . ' . . . ' ' . L. . 12' 0 L' ' 12' 0 5 ' ' . ' . . ' . . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' . ' . . . ' ' . 6 . . . . . . . , ' ' . . ' ' . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 353 139 122 81 THRU 311 190 1955 1710 RIGHT 120 117 260 99 TRUCKS (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 216 300 763 627 LEFT 339 8 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 353 139 122 81 ADJUSTED VOL 339 8 0 0 CAPACITY 0 423 136 0 MOVEMENT N/A OK OK OK 401 | 7W ' F--"dc%F:;:E-;C)V4 S3 �� I INJ C�Pz---F:-1:::-<"C3 F::7F::::- �F-Z I -IF I L_ M C)%,,'FEE M E:P%J-IF �P-J dnb I ',e c-3 I E; ��11%.1 l_=I=< dnk E—= Z C-;1=<ink"ic�M L_C3 tq C3 -F-F_= F;:M 02%L_-r � � DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE 13 SATURATION E31L 'X- CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM IL :7.E3 E3 ************************************* LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND S T SOUTHBOUND EASBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 L- . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 3 L. ' 12. 0 ' ' ' ' ' . ' T. ' 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 4 . ' . . . . ' . . ' ' . . ' L. ' 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 5 ' ' . . . . . . . . . ' . ' . ' ' . . . . ' ' . . . . . 6 . ' ' . ' ' . . . . . . . . , . , ' ' . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 353 138 122 81 THRU 311 190 1920 1658 RIGHT 120 116 260 98 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 3 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 ' 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH : 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 216 299 750 609 LEFT 339 6 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 353 138 122 81 ADJUSTED VOL 339 6 0 0 CAPACITY 0 422 141 0 MOVEMENT N/A OK OK OK �� _� � F'AF<SONS E{F-< I MCI- EFR "IOiFF CF: I T I CFc�I M C3ksJEMI-M-T" IPA IV42!hLYS = E3 W0AFR E=F: is ' / GFtionk"ocA M L_ONC I-EF:M PAC3 F'FZQ 7 EiL.T (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE L] SATURATION 8-ft•1 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL CRITICAL SUM 14.4 •ii#�:#:c if•#•ii•�f•ii••ie ii�•)c##•�•#•ii•#•3f#ii aF#•#•iE##*is i•3i ii ��# LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHDOUND EASTI-,'OI.JND WESTBOUNh 1-10V WIDTH MOV W I D-f I-i tlOV WIDTH MOV W I DTI i 1 RT. 15. �) RT. 1�. 0 RT. 15. 0 T.. 1 . 0 w. T. . 12. C) L. . 1:=. 0 T. 12. �_� T. . 1�'. i) L. . 12. �� . . . . . . . T. . 1.^••. 0 T. . 12. i) 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12. i) 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 5 ) 1=C i?i) E;c l"HRU 31 i 190 1940 RIGHT 12C 115 260 95 -fRUCF:::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF::* HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 71 1 EASTBOUND 5 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 215 298 609 7��5 LEFT 336 0 C-) 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME .35C) 173 5 120 8`; ADJUSTED VOL 3.36 i) 0 i) CAPACITY i) 419 104 C-) MOVEMENT N/A OK OF: OF`: 9g F•AF:<SC]tVS BFc I tVCF=:EFR"CIF=F CF=< I -V I GALL MCI%..+'FEE MEtq_F AtVALY'E3 I E3 W F;ZFJER 1= i' C-3F=< —tA t_C)tV(E; T1iIF1M AF•F'L I CAt\tT (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL_ OF SERVICE ID SATURATION E3 7 f CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL_. fB&-i.= CRITICAL SUM #c�c- •Y•#��•ii•ii••�i•i'c#i'is•�is ii Yc is#i•ii ii is ii•it�•#x•ii•i!••ic�i'��•i4•ri•# LANE GEOMETR`! NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1 F:••F. 15. 6 RT. 15. C) RT. 15. �� RT. 1 j CG T. . 1 Ci L. . 1.:. ri T. T. . L. . ly. �� . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 1X_ 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12.V L. . 121. U 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT THRU '1�� 19C.) L' 4C �170 RIGHT 120 120 26C) 95 TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK' HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND j _ 1 SOUTHROUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 31 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . U — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 215 303 863 785 LEFT 336 C) 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1NFUT VOLUME 350 135 125 85 ADJUSTED VOL_ T 36 i) C) 0 CAPACITY i 424 78 C► MOVEMENT N/A Ok:: OK. Ok:: 99 F'ink FR: 3 C3 r,.J S E{F=;: I Iq C O-=-_E 1=;!I-I C)F=F C1=1 I T I C!c�L_ Iv1C)Vl—=MEtV-V d!:Ndt%,J ink L-YS I S tAiock1 :1%jr=— :;: AV1= f G1=,:A"ickM I—C)tgC-3 '�F1=F-CM AI T _ 1 (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 •)i•#•�••#•#ii•#•�••�••*##•)i•�E•�•�i•ii ai•�E•i6•)t•ii•#�#•ii••#••iF�i•�•�••�•;t•� LEVEL OF SERVICE ID SATURATION E3-77/- CRITICAL N/S VOL + '4=-' CRITICAL ElLJ VOL E3 5C-3 CRITICAL SUM I Z+S'Z �!•#•)l••Yc ii-iF it i*c•)f is i?••4•ii••af••fr ii••ic#at is is ii•�F#i••it••ii T#*#3c x is•ii•;Er.•ic LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHL�OUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE P•10V WIDTH MOV WIDTH MO'J WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1�. C) RT. 15. C) RT. 1 ) RT. 1� . i) I . . 1 '. C) L. . 1?. �) T. . I". (_) T. 1?. C) L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12). 0 T. . I':'. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 1.2. 0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EAS'l-BOUND WESTBOUND LEFT =�C) 1 THRU _�1C) 19C) r .'C► 211510 RIGHT 12i> 12C) 2'6C) 95 I-RUCk::S (%) LOCAL_ BUSES (#/1-IR) PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND S _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH a 8C) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 215 303 858 778 LEFT 336 0 c_) 0 LEFT TURN CHECF::: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 3J(_) 13 1 �` c3Ce ADJUSTED VOL '76 C) C) C) CAPACITY C) 424 80 C) MOVEMENT N/A Ok:: Ok:: OF: /av v F'ink F:EOIVE ]EiF: I hl(--1::EF:I- C3F F GF: I Y I tL MC]VEI"tE1\J_F I E wdfniF;N FEE F: d!nb EF:Aa—IAM I_Otq(E; —I—I-F:M ALA _ 122 (INCLUDES BOLSA CHICA) DATE: 9/9/87 LEVEL 01= SERVICE L) SATURtAT I ON 8 6'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL E-I-q!S CRITICAL SUM I -4E3r; LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUNI.) SOUTHBOUND F ASTI3OUND WESTBOUN0 LANE MOV WIDTH NOV WIDTH MO'•1 WIDTH NOV WIDTH 1. (; f. 1J. C) RT•. 1 ,. c) R1 . 15. c) Rl . c) T. . 3.2. i) L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. i) T. . L. . i. . () . . . . . . . T. . 1 . i) 1 . . 12. 0 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. [j L. . 12. C) 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT G THRU "'10 190 195 �)95 RIGHT 12C) 12 ) 2N'6C) 95 TRUCK:.S ( ) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOU1-HBOUND EASTBOUND 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH E30 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 215 30.7 846 759 LEFT 336 0 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK; NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1 5 ADJUSTED VOL '36 C) i) CAPACITY 0 424 87 i) MOVEMENT N/A Of: OF:: OK. col NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING LAND USE ELEMENT 87-2C - ZONE CHANGE 87-13 & EIR 87-2 (MEADOWLARK AIRPORT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. February 1, 1988 , Monday ME : 7 . 00 p .m. y4;3,�ECT: Land Use Element Amendment 87-2c, Zone Change 87-13 and Environmental Impact Report 87-2 L,�7LI_CA NT: Dick Nerio . LOCATION: Approximately 600 feet north east of the intersection of Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue . f =ROPO AL: Amend the General Plan by redesignating the 65 acre Meadowlark Airport from Low Density Residential to Planned Community with a concurrent zone change from MH (Mobilehome, maximum nine units per acre) to Meadowlark Specific Plan which would allow 15 acres of retail commercial and 50 acres of mixed residential not to exceed. 600 units (an average of 12 units per acre) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Environmental Impact Report No . 87-2 assessing the environmental impact of the project will also be considered by the City Council . fir! FILE: Community Development ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public . HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone: (714) 536-5405 (9837d) 1 a i 2 7.1 EXHIBIT 1 L, U i E, 87-2 c AREA PAP huntington beach planning division NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: February 1, 1988, Monday TIME: 7:00 p.m. SUBJECT: Land Use Element Amendment 87-2c, Zone Change 87-13 and Environmental Impact Report 87-2 APPLICANT: Dick Nerio LOCATION: Approximately 600 feet north east of the intersection of Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue. r PROPOSAL: Amend the General Plan by redesignating the 65 acre Meadowlark Airport from Low Density Residential to Planned Community with a concurrent zone change from MH (Mobilehome, maximum nine units per acre) to Meadowlark Specific Plan which would allow 15 acres of retail commercial and 50 acres of mixed residential not to exceed 600 units (an average of 12 units per acre) . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2 N FILE: Community Development ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone: (714) 536-5405 (9837d) F I a ; t � � 7 � __ •o-un 2 t�•Mh luri ` EXHIBIT 1 L, U,E, 87-2 c AREA PAP huntington beach planning division NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING I TEM LUE-e)-2c- �e�r� 31-Z��G 87- 13 TO: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: FROM: Cv�.�.,�,� a)ev X. M.+j -T PLEASE SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE X I DAY OF . 1983. ZAs :a:r:eattached AP' s will follow No AP' s Initiated by: Planning Commission Planning Department Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) X IR ND NON Has City Attorney's Office been lE NO informed of forthcoming public 1I hearing? Refer to �-iat s'M- .r Planning Department - Extension #fry for additional information. * If appeal , please transmit exact wording to be required in the legal . IF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT - PLEASE MARK ( ) ( ) APPEALABLE NOT APPEALABLE MEADOWLARK AIRPORT SITE � TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FINAL REPORT 1 1 Prepared by Parsons Brfnckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. March 1987 Tum= i 1 I ' FINAL REPORT MEADOWLARK AIRPORT SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADS do DOUGLAS, INC. �I March, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 Methodology 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2 Circulation System 2 Public Transit Service 2 Intersection Level of Service 2 Arterial Level of Service 6 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 9 1 Project Trip Generation 9 Near Term Traffic 11 Long Term Traffic 17 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 �I APPENDICES A-G TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES Figure PAGE 1 State Highway Average Daily Traffic 3 2 Existing Study Area Circulation System and Average 4 Daily Traffic 3 Land Use and Average Daily Traffic for Proposed Project 10 4 Near Term Average Daily Traffic without Project 12 5 Distribution of Project Traffic 15 6 Near Term Project Average Daily Traffic 16 7 Long Term Average Daily Traffic without Project 18 8 Alternative A Project Average Daily Traffic 23 (No Residential Warner Access) 9 Alternative B Project Average Dail Traffic 24 g Y (Res. Access at Pearce Dr. & Leslie Ln.) 10 Alternative C Project Average Daily Traffic 26 (No Access at Pearce Dr.) TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES Table PAGE 1 Existing PM Peak Hour Signalized Intersection 6 Level of Service 2 Arterial ADT and Level of Service 7 3 Existing Arterial Level of Service for Study Area 8 4 Trip Generation for Proposed Land Uses 9 5 Near Term PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service 13 Without Project 6 Near Term PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service 14 With Project 7 Long Term PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service 19 Without Project 8 Long Term PM Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service 21 With Project -t. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of a traffic analysis performed for the proposed commercial/residential development of the existing Meadowlark Airport site. The 65 acre development as currently proposed involves four basic areas which are divided into 45 acres of residential units (825 units total), 3-5 acres of senior citizen housing (250 units) and 13-15 acres devoted to commercial uses. Construction of the project will be phased, with the completion of the commercial area scheduled for approxi- mately five years (1991) and the residential areas estimated to be completed in ten years (1996). Methodoloev The components of this traffic impact analysis for the proposed development of the Meadowlark Airport site include three basic traffic scenarios. They are an examina- tion of existing traffic conditions, future conditions with arterial improvements as proposed by the City of Huntington Beach in place (excluding the Meadowlark project traffic), and future conditions including traffic from the proposed project. Each scenario is evaluated qualitatively and on the basis of arterial Average Daily Traffic (ADT), intersection peak hour traffic volumes, and related volume capacity (V/C) ratios and levels of service. To accomplish this evaluation it was necessary to create an existing traffic data base, project future traffic volumes without the project (based on growth rates for the area), and estimate project traffic flows by determining trip generation associated with proposed land uses and directional distribution of this traffic. Access to the project site and conceptual internal circulation were examined under three access alternatives. To analyze present and future traffic a study area bounded by Edinger Avenue to the north, Springdale Street to the east, Warner Avenue to the south and Algonquin Street to the west was established. Traffic data pertaining to this area was collected from several sources: existing State Highway ADT counts were obtained from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans); arterial ADT counts and aerial photographs of the study area were provided by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department; and field data surveys were made of afternoon peak period turning -1- +s movement counts at key study area intersections, a 24-hour machine count and hand counts at three locations on Pearce Drive, and intersection/arterial lane configura- tions and sight distances at proposed project access points. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Circulation 5ystem ' Regional access to the project site (see Figure 1) is provided by I-405 (San Diego Freeway), SR-22 (Garden Grove Freeway) and SR-1 (Pacific Coast Highway). Warner Avenue serves a dual purpose, accommodating regional traffic east of the City of Huntington Beach, as well as eastbound and westbound traffic within the study area. Heil Avenue also provides east-west circulation in the study area. Northbound and southbound traffic near the project is primarily accommodated by Bolsa Chica Street and Springdale Street. Study area streets and existing ADT are shown in Figure 2. Public Transit Service The Orange County Transit District (OCTD) currently provides service to the study area. Routes 70 and 72 serve the project site, with bus stops currently located at Warner Avenue/Graham Street, Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street, Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue, and Heil Avenue/Waterway Circle. Intersection Level of Service The quality of traffic flow through an intersection is usually described in terms of a Level of Service (LOS) from 'A' to IF'. Level of Service is a measure of several factors including operating speeds, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and average delay for vehicles at intersections. Facility capacity (which determines level of service in combination with traffic volumes) is affected by the number and configura- tion of intersection lanes, degree of access control, roadway grades and design geometrics, sight distances and the amount of bus, truck, pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Appendix Table A describes the quality of traffic flows for each level of service rating. I -2- .............. ........ GARDEN GROVE FWe.. m i � • Q I.... ................ WESTMINSTER BLVD. I x � U � m 4 70 EDINGER AVE. O OJ W 42 m 3 AVE. ..■.....■...■■■■■■ ■.■..... WARNER 4 9 ul 10 r FWY: c CL 8-- t9 a 9 y 14 ; 00 ti Z 0 , W O O O XX in Thousands 47 y MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure State Highway Average Daily Traffic 1 -3- EDINGER AVE. Z J H cc 0 y Z < 28.8 8.5 HEIL 8.2 1 T.5 AVE. 15 s 8 U J PEARCE DR.1.4 = n cc Z z 26.8 W I o a 1 Z � J y 0 001 U WARNER 32 30 30 AVE. z J US Jco LU J W 2 J W m W XX In Thousands MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure Existing Study Area Circulation System ]E2 g p � ® and Average Daily Traffic -4- Intersections at Level of Services 'A' to 'C' operate quite well. Level of Service 'D', which is characterized by heavy but stable traffic flow, is the standard to which urban ' roadways are typically designed. Level of Service 'E' represents operating conditions at or near capacity and results in notable delays, frequently requiring motorists to wait more than one signal cycle. Level of Service 'F' occurs when a facility is overloaded, and is characterized by extensive delay and motorists waiting through multiple signal cycles. Level of Service 'F' has negative effects not only on user time and frustration but on fuel consumption and the mobility of emergency vehicles. The level of service is related to the intersection's volume/capacity ratio (the amount of traffic coming into an intersection relative to its design capacity) as follows: V/C Ratio Level of (Saturation) r Service__ 0.00 - 0.60 A 0.61 - 0.70 B 0.71 - 0.80 C 0.81 - 0.90 D 0.91 - 1.00 E over - 1.00 F To determine how well signalized study area intersections accommodate peak traffic volumes, afternoon peak hour turning counts, (see Appendix B) were conducted at the following key intersections: Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue Warner Avenue/Graham Street The afternoon peak hour traffic counts were used in combination with the lane geometry and existing signal phasing to calculate current levels of service at each of the signalized intersections. These calculations were performed on a microcomputer version of the Critical Movement Analysis procedure detailed in Circular 212 of the Transportation Research Board. From this analysis (which compares peak hour traffic volumes to intersection capacity), levels of service based on V/C ratios were ' -5- determined. Table 1 summarizes these results. Documentation of the critical movement analysis for these signalized intersections is contained in Appendix C. TABLE 1 EXISTING PM PEAR HOUR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Level of Volume/ Intersection Service Capacity Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue D .88 Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue B .65 Warner Avenue/Graham Street A .59 From Table 1 it is evident that the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection is nearing capacity during the afternoon peak hour. Operating at LOS 'D' a high density, but stable flow can be expected. The other two key intersections are operating at good levels of service. For the two intersections controlled by stop signs (Pearce Drive/Bolsa Chica Street ' and Heil Avenue/Graham Street), an initial analysis of arterial conditions on a daily basis was conducted to determine if further peak hour analysis was warranted for existing conditions. The results are presented in the next section. Arterial Level of Service Arterial traffic conditions can also be evaluated in terms of volume/capacity ratios rand related level of service ratings. The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency Transportation Planning Division recommends LOS C as a desirable arterial capacity, since standard roadways ' operating at that level of service in the Orange County region can be expected to have intersections operating at LOS D, which approaches design capacity. -6- The table below lists estimated ADT at various levels of service by roadway classifications. TABLE 2 ARTERIAL ADT AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Tape of Maximum ADT and Corresnondine Level of Service ` P rterial Description A B C D E F Major 6 lanes, divided 36,000 40,500 45,000 49,500 54,000 Primary 4 lanes, divided 24,000 27,000 30,000 33,000 36,000 Se condary 4 lanes, undivided 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 Commuter 2 lanes, undivided 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 *Volumes greater than maximum ADT at LOS 'E' Using the maximum ADT volumes listed in Table 2 and comparing existing ADT to these volumes, existing arterial levels of service were calculated (Table 3). As can be se(-n, all arterials are currently operating at acceptable levels of service on a daily ba:;is with the exception of Warner Avenue which is nearing capacity. ' Thy; data presented above can also be used to estimate operating conditions at the two unsignalized study area intersections, Pearce Drive/Bolsa Chica Street and Heil Avenue/Graham Street. Pewee Drive and Bolsa Chica Street are operating at LOS 'A' on an average daily bas s, therefore their intersection is anticipated to be operating at an acceptable level of service ('C' or better) in peak conditions. Hei: Avenue and Graham Street are operating at LOS 'B' and 'C' respectively on a dail;i basis. Since Graham Street operates at LOS 'C', further peak hour intersection analysis was warranted. To determine peak hour conditions at Graham Street/Heil Ave iue a comparison of intersection peak hour volumes to capacity was conducted in accc rdance with the Highway Capacity Manual. (Turning volume diagrams used in this analysis are available for review in Appendix D.) From this, it was determined that this intersection accommodates volumes below its capacity and is operating at LOS 'C' during the afternoon peak. -7- ' TABLE 3 EXISTING ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR STUDY AREA Roadway Limits ADT L OS Heil Avenue Algonquin to Bolsa Chica 8,200 A Heil Avenue Bolsa Chica to Graham 17,500 B Heil Avenue Graham to Springdale 15,000 A Pearce Drive Bolsa Chica east to Terminus 1,400 A* Warner Avenue Algonquin to Bolsa Chica 32,000 D Warner Avenue Bolsa Chica to Graham 30,000 C Warner Avenue Graham to Springdale 30,000 C Bolsa Chica Road Edinger to Heil 28,800 A Bolsa Chica Road Heil to Warner 26,800 A Graham Street Edinger to Heil 8,500 C Graham Street Heil to Warner 8,000 C ' * Based on 2,500 maximum ADT for residential streets per City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department r t -8- 1 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Since the project is proposed to be constructed in phases, traffic volumes for two future scenarios, near and long term (1991 and 1996 respectively) were developed. For the near term scenario the commercial area of the project is expected to be built, with the remainder of the project anticipated to be finished by 1996, as represented by the long term scenario. Project Trip Generation ' Figure 3 illustrates project land uses as currently proposed and Table 4 presents associated daily traffic, calculated using trip generation rates compiled from rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Report, California Department of Transportation 15th Progress Report on Trip Ends Genera- tion Research Counts, and data obtained from the City of Huntington Beach Traffic Engineering Department. TABLE 4 TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED LAND USES Units/ Trip Rate Number Number Land Use Acre Rate Unit of Units offs ' Residential Medium 15.0 7.0 D.U. 450 3,150 High 25.0 5.0 D.U. 375 1,875 Senior Citizen --- 3.3 D.U. 250 825 Subtotal 5,850 iCommercial --- 600.0 Acre 14 8,400 Total 14,250 More than half (8,400) the project's daily trips are expected to be associated with the commercial area off Warner Avenue. Of the residential uses, the medium density area (15 units/acre) off Heil Avenue would generate the greater part of the daily traffic (approximately 3,200). When these volumes are compared to arterial capacities of the 1 roadways providing project access, it is apparent that the major project traffic -9- .6 Hel Ave. s _ Ir Ir 7 g TA ON OR 7Q T RESIDENTIAL O J L OR. o LJ E W i T -� SENIOR CITIZEN `�v� MEADOW CR XX IN THOUSANDS COMMERCIAL T =TRANSITION AREA - OPEN SPACE/LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ' Warner Ave. r 1 MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure r Land Use and Average Daily Traffic 3 S � ® for Proposed Project ' generators are situated adjacent to arterials capable of accommodating 22,000-33,000 ADT at LOS 'D'. The least amount of traffic (825 trips daily) is anticipated to be generated by the senior citizen housing, which in combination with transition areas forms a buffer zone for existing residential areas adjacent to Roosevelt Lane. Trip generation in terms of average daily traffic was examined for four land use scenarios proposed by the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. The results of this comparison are available for review in Appendix Table E. ' Near Term Traffic Background Traffic: Future 1991 traffic volumes without the project were estimated by increasing existing arterial ADT by a 3.5% annual growth factor, after the current traffic attributable to the airport had been subtracted from the existing ADT. The growth factor reflects average annual growth rates of 3 to 4% over the past six years as estimated by the City of Huntington Beach Traffic Engineering Department. In light of the fact, this area has undergone considerable growth in the recent past, and ' with projects such as the Bolsa Chica development planned for the future a rate of 3.5% is not unreasonable. Background ADT volumes are presented in Figure 4. tExisting afternoon peak hour factors, directional splits and intersection turning movement percentages were applied to the daily traffic projections to achieve estimates of 1991 peak hour intersection turning movements for the three key signalized intersections (turning diagrams are in Appendix D). The process used in ' calculating existing intersection levels of service was applied to the projected 1991 afternoon peak hour volumes and intersection geometries (assuming improvements ' currently proposed by the City), to produce levels of service and V/C ratios for near term intersections without project traffic (see Table 5). Documentation of the critical movement analysis for these intersections can be found in Appendix C. i 1 �` -11- EDINGER AVE. Z J (A z 33.9 10. 1 ' HEIL 9. 7 20.8 AVE. 17.9 ' N 9.5 U W PEARCE DR. 1.4 < p i z 31.6 W I v a Z W J y O OI < WARNER 37.9 °C 35. 1 35. 1 AVE. ' Z J ' W W � J Q J O W Z -J W toW XX-in Thousands ' MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure ' Near Terra Average Daily Traffic S ® without Project 4 ' TABLE 5 NEAR TERM PM PEAR HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE* Near Term tWithout Proiect Intersection V C LOS ' Bolsa Chica Street/ Warner Avenue .86 D Bolsa Chica Street/ Heil Avenue .74 C ' Warner Avenue/ Graham Street .67 B *Assumes arterial improvements currently planned by the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street. ' As can be seen in Table 5 two of the key intersections are anticipated to be operating at acceptable levels of service ('C' or better), assuming proposed arterial improvements are in place. The Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS 'D' conditions, although some improvement in capacity is gained with the additional through lanes on Warner Avenue. As in the existing conditions analysis, initial peak hour level of service of the two intersections controlled by stop signs (Pearce Drive/Bolsa Chica Street and Heil Avenue/Graham Street) were examined based on arterial capacities. The four ' arterials can be expected to be operating as follows: Level of Arterial Service ' Bolsa Chica Street A Pearce Drive A Heil Avenue D Graham Street C Due to the potential interruption to the increasingly higher volumes along Bolsa Chica Street at the Pearce Drive/Bolsa Chica Street intersection, and the decreased arterial levels of service at the Heil Avenue/Graham Street intersection, both intersections ' -13- warranted further analysis; therefore traffic signal warrants were prepared (see Appendix F). The analysis indicated that near term peak hour conditions without project traffic are anticipated to warrant traffic signals at both intersections. Assuming a two-phase signal is in place, the corresponding levels of service at the ' Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Avenue intersection is expected to be LOS 'A' (.33 V/C ratio) and at the Heil Avenue/Graham Street intersection LOS 'A' (.37 V/C ratio). ' Project Traffic: Near term traffic attributable to the project would be entirely commercial trips accessing the project from Warner Avenue. The directional distribution of this traffic was based on a traffic model for the City of Huntington Beach developed by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. Figure 5 presents the percentage of project traffic assumed to be travelling to and from each direction. Future 1991 estimates of arterial project traffic (see Figure 6) were produced by applying these general percentages to trip generation estimates and assigning traffic to the roadway system based on logical access routes. Peak hour turning movements were estimated and overlaid upon near-term background traffic (turning movement figures are presented in Appendix D). Levels of service were again calculated for the key intersections and are presented in Table 6. (Documentation of the critical movement analysis is presented in the Appendix C.) TABLE 6 NEAR TERM PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ' With Project Without Mitigation With Mitieation2 Intersection V C LOS VAC LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .92 E .84 D Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .35 A -- -- Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue .76 C -- -- ' Heil Avenue/Graham Street .38 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .71 C ' 1Assumes arterial improvements currently planned by the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street. 2See text for explanation of mitigations. I -14- GARDEN (TROVE 6% FWY. ' o m ¢ WE3TINM18TER BLVD. 0� O v o o ` 7% 7%'s v � ' 22% to �o EDINGER AVE. 'O 10/o o 8% < F 0 J W i 5% ° 3 AVE. ' WARNER 28% W J 2 a ' CO '!O l� _ W C J O O ' 7/o y MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure ° Distribution of Project Traffic 5 • ' —15— ' EDINGER AVE. ' z Ci ac 2. 1 HEIL AVE. .4 J PEARCE DR. < p ' < Z J co IL 2.S W Z IJ co 0 1 oCo 0 � < WARNER CCV AVE. t 1.2 3.7 4.7 4.6 W W W Cr m J = W W w C7 1 XX in Thousands ' < Project Access Point MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure Near Term Project Average Daily Traffic 6 -16- LThe addition of project traffic is anticipated to lower the level of service at Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue from 'D' to 'E", (an increase of .06 to the V/C ratio). Providing a separate westbound right turn lane is anticipated to increase conditions to LOS 'D'. The remaining intersections are expected to continue operation at acceptable levels of service ('C' or better). The addition of peak hour project traffic does not I significantly change the levels of service discussed above for the near term background traffic scenario. I� A traffic ect AccessJ signal warrant analysis was conducted for the Warner Avenue/Project g Y I J intersection (see Appendix F). The warrant was satisfied with the inclusion of project vehicles alone, (i.e., as in a typical 'T' intersection with Warner Avenue), and is Jtherefore recommended. A critical movement analysis was not conducted due to uncertainties regarding the location of project access across from Leslie Lane (hence a Jfour-way intersection), or at some other location on Warner Avenue (resulting in a three-way intersection). 1 Lo Term Traffic Background Traffic: As in the near term scenario, 1996 volumes were estimated by increasing existing ADT by the 3.5% annual growth factor after subtracting current rtraffic attributable to airport operations. Figure 7 presents these volumes. Peak hour volumes and intersection levels of service were calculated as in the near term scenario above, and assume intersection improvements as proposed by the City as 1 well as the mitigations for project traffic proposed for near term conditions. Intersection turning movement diagrams and critical movement analysis documenta- tion are presented in the Appendix. The estimated V/C ratios and corresponding levels of service can be found in Table 7. t I ' -17- 1 1 EDINGER AVE. J ' z 40.3 12.0 HEIL 11.6 24. 7 AVE. 21.2 ' 11.3 C� W PEARCE DR. 1.4 J zz ~ a a Z J Q ' 37.5 W �Z y v 0 0 IJ v WARNER 45.0 ¢ 41.6 41.6 AVE. 1 z J ' W LU W G J Q 0 W z m J . W cc XX-in Thousands 1 1 MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure 1 Long Term Average Daily Traffic 7 without Project -18- �1 TABLE 7 LONG TERM PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WITHOUT PROJECT' Without Mitigation With Miti ation Intersection V C LOS VAC LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .95 E .82 D2 Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .39 A -- -- Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.12 F .81 D3 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .42 A -- -- Warner Avenue/Graham Street .81 D -- -- 1A Assumes arterial improvements proposed b City n term mitigations.ss p p p y y and proposed near t ga s. 2 Assumes a separate northbound right turn lane and a second eastbound left turn lane. 3Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through/right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. 1 In addition to the City's proposed roadway improvements and mitigations proposed for ' near term, mitigations listed in the table are anticipated to be necessary to achieve LOS 'D' conditions at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersections. The other key intersections are expected to operate at LOS 'D' or better without mitigation. rProject Traffic: Long term traffic attributable to the project would include both residential and commercial trips, totalling 14,300 ADT. Commercial trips would continue to access the project from Warner Avenue. Several possible access points for residential trips were examined, including a new street which would intersect Warner Avenue opposite Leslie Lane, Pearce Drive (or a new street south of Pearce Drive for access to Bolsa Chica Street), and a new street for access to Heil Avenue (approxi- mately midway between Bolsa Chica Street and Graham Street). ' Because of the variety of potential project access points, and their potential for affecting traffic on surrounding arterials, three access alternatives were developed for long term project traffic. All assume commercial traffic continues to use Warner Avenue for access. However, residential trips are assumed to access the project as follows: -19- • Alternative A: assumes all residential trips use Pearce Drive and Heil Avenue for access with project roadways connecting both streets. • Alternative B: assumes access at Pearce Drive (or through the development south of Pearce), Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue with project streets connecting all external access points to each other. • Alternative C: assumes no direct westerly access to Bolsa Chica Street (either by Pearce Drive or the development to the south), but residential access is provided by Heil and Warner Avenues with internal project roadways connecting these two streets. For each alternative, future 1996 estimates of arterial project traffic were developed assuming the same basic trip distribution relationships and assignment procedures as in the near term scenario. Peak hour intersection turning movements were estimated and combined with long-term background traffic projections (see Appendix D for turning diagrams). Levels of service and V/C ratios at the key signalized intersections (assuming proposed signals at the existing stop-controlled intersection are in place), were then calculated based on these volumes, (see Appendix C for critical movement analysis documentation). Table 8 presents the level of service ratings and V/C ratios for the intersections by alternative. Inclusion of project traffic under all alternatives is expected to decrease the level of service at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersections to LOS 'F' which exceeds capacity. The Warner Avenue/Graham Street intersection is anticipated to decrease to LOS 'D' which represents high-density, but stable traffic flows. The other two key study area intersections are anticipated to be operating at LOS 'A'. Mitigation the two intersections expected to be operating at LOS 'F' to LOS 'D' conditions requires the same measures for all project alternatives. For the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection, these measures include adding a separate northbound right turn lane and a second eastbound left turn lane. At the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection, the proposed mitigations include a separate south- bound right turn lane, a combination westbound through/right lane in place of the separate right turn lane and signal phasing which allows for protected left turns for all -20- am aw AMR TABLE 8 LONG TERM PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE WITH PROJECTI Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Without With Without With Without With Mitwtion Mitigation Mit' action Mit' action Mitwation Mitika_tion_ Intersection V C LOS V C LOS V C LOS V C LOS V C LOS V C LOOS Bolsa Chica Street/ Warner Avenue 1.02 F .89 D2 1.01 F .88 D2 1.01 F .88 D2 Bolsa Chica Street/ Pearce Drive .43 A -- .42 A -- -- .42 A -- -- Bolsa Chica Street/ Heil Avenue 1.21 F .86 D3 1.21 F .86 D3 1 .20 F .85 D3 Heil Avenue/Graham Street .44 A -- .43 A -- -- .44 A -- -- Warner Avenue/ Graham Street .88 D -- -- .88 D -- -- .89 D -- -- 1 Assumes arterial improvement proposed by City and proposed near term mitigations. 2 Assumes a separate northbound right turn lane and a second eastbound left turn lane. 3Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through/right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. directions. Differences in arterial traffic flows resulting from the alternative access locations to the project are discussed below. Alternative A: Under this Alternative all residential traffic would access the project via Pearce Drive or Heil Avenue, with internal site circulation connecting both of these streets. Commercial traffic would use Warner Avenue; there would be no direct access from the commercial area to project residential areas. The ADT projected for this alternative (Figure 8) estimates project ADT of 3,500 for Pearce Drive, which alone exceeds the City's recommended maximum for residential roadways. Warner Avenue adjacent to the project site is expected to be operating at LOS 'D' with the addition of project traffic (LOS 'C' without). The addition of project traffic to Heil Avenue is expected to decrease the service level on this arterial to 'F' between the project and Graham Street (as is the case for background traffic alone), and to 'E' (from LOS 'D' without project traffic) from Graham Street to Springdale Street. Alternative B: This alternative assumes residential traffic has access to the j roect P via Heil Avenue, Pearce Drive (or a street south of Pearce Drive), and Warner Avenue, while commercial traffic continues to use Warner Avenue. Internal site circulation connects all three access locations; however the connection between Warner Avenue and Pearce Drive (or through the proposed development south of Pearce Drive) is proposed to be somewhat indirect, incorporating turns and jogs along this route. (In Appendix G, Figure 1 illustrates Alternative A, Figures 2 and 3 Alternative B, and Figure 4 Alternative C.) The incorporation of turns in the conceptual design of this connection, in combination with slower residential travel speeds, is anticipated to deter traffic from using this roadway as a "short-cut" from Warner Avenue. Figure 9 shows that under Alternative B, 1,200 project-related vehicles are anticipated to use Pearce Drive. The connection of Pearce Drive to Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue is expected to relieve some existing traffic on Pearce Drive between Roosevelt Lane and Bolsa Chica Street, as residents use project roadways to access north-eastern, eastern and southern destinations (assuming the Warner Avenue/Leslie Lane intersection is signalized). Seventy-five percent of the residences currently served by Pearce Drive access this roadway via Roosevelt Lane. Assuming this traffic is diverted to project roadways, a reduction of approximately 700 vehicles daily could be expected on Pearce Drive, resulting in a total of 1,900 daily vehicles including -22- 3.2 EDINGER AVE. .5 i J S.' 3.6 .2 0 1.5 z U. HEIL .6 .3 AVE. 2.2 1.9 4. 1 A V J PEARCE DR. 3.5 < i .2 z z � o a .9 4.2 W I J y O OI O O WARNER V AVE. 2 4.5 wi 5.8 5.7 W W � J J ~ W z 1.8 m -' W XX in Thousands < Project Access Points MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure Alternative A Project Average Daily Traffic 8 g � pj ® (No Residential Warner Access) -23- 3.2 EDINGER AVE. .5 .3 z J < 1.4 4 .2 y z i U. HEIL .5 .6 AVE. 1 A < 4.4 _U J W PEARCE DR.1'2 < < G < < .2 °z 1.4 = d Wrx i 3.2 WSJ co O C ' 0 < WARNER V AVE. 1.9 4.8 .2ii 6.6 6.4 W W < J W co J W z 1.8 m J W W Q O XX in Thousands < Project Access Points MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure Alternative B Project Average Daily Traffic (Res. Access at Pearce Dr. & Leslie Ln.) 9 —24— project traffic. It should be noted that background traffic along Pearce Drive was not g g increased by the annual 3.5% growth factor due to the isolated nature of these residential streets. Significant increases to this traffic can only be anticipated to occur with the connection of this street to other developments, such as the proposed M project under study in this report. Conditions on Warner Avenue adjacent to the project are expected to decrease from LOS 'C' without project traffic to LOS 'D' with project traffic. Background traffic volumes on Heil Avenue between the project access location and Graham Street is �I 'anticipated to decrease to LOS 'F . Service levels along g the remainder of Heil Avenue are not expected to be significantly affected by the project. Alternative C: This alternative assumes no direct westerly access to Bolsa Chica Street for project traffic. Access is provided off Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue with internal project roadways connecting both streets,(see Appendix G, Figure 4). Under this alternative daily traffic conditions (Figure 10) on Warner Avenue are decreased from LOS ICI to 'D' between Algonquin Street and Springdale Street with the addition of project traffic. Level of Service 'F' is expected on Heil Avenue between Bolsa Chica Street and Graham Street with or without the addition of project traffic. Conditions on Heil Avenue east of Graham Street are expected to decrease from LOS 'D' to 'E' with the inclusion of project traffic. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The 3.5% annual growth factor utilized to project future traffic volumes in this �J analysis was based on recent growth trends in the general City of Huntington Beach area. This rate can be expected to decrease somewhat in the future as the number of vacant parcels in the vicinity diminish. However, volumes are anticipated to continue r to increase due to development of existing vacant land (such as the Bolsa Chica project), intensifications of existing land uses (as with this proposed project), and further growth in traffic travelling through the study area. Therefore, a 3.5% annual growth factor is substantiated and in all likelihood is a conservative measure. In the light of this the following mitigations are recommended: -25- 2.9 EDINGER AVE. .5 i � J r t a 3.4 .4 1.4 z HEIL AVE. .6 .8 A 1.5 1.3 0 3.6 W J PEARCE DR. < p < i 1.5 z J cc z 3.6 .. .3 y 02 0� 01 ti co < WARNER V AVE. 2 5.2 _2J! 6.8 6.6 W W < J W J W z 1.8 m J W W Q: O XX in Thousands < Project Access Points MEADOWLARK AIRPORT TRAFFIC STUDY Figure Alternative C Project Average Daily Traffic o 10(No Access at Pearce Dr.) -26- i Near Term • Provide three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street (as the City currently plans). • Add a separate westbound right turn lane on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street. I • Install traffic signals at the following intersections: Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive, Heil Avenue/Graham Street and Warner Avenue/Project Access. Ah yo Long-Term 0 Add a separate northbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica t Street/Warner Avenue intersection. 1 • Provide a second eastbound left turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection. t • Add a separate southbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection. • Replace the westbound right turn only lane with a combination through/right lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection. • Alter the signal phasing at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection protecting all left turns. For internal project circulation and access to the arterial street system, an access plan like Alternative B is recommended. This internal circulation plan maximizes access opportunities to surrounding arterial streets, and minimizes potential negative traffic impacts on Pearce Drive by discouraging through traffic movements. -27- p� i-a A z w Ow a m 1.4 z w a a 1 P'AFtSONS E9FR I 1.1CF :EF;:HOFF CF< I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANtcL_'le S I S GFZAHAM ST /HE I L_ AVE FL M LONG TEF~M AL_T _ E{ DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4 CRITICAL N/S VOL 4(Dc7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 3-79 CRITICAL SUM 7 7 9 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 25. L. . 1112. 0 L. . 12. 0 LT. 1�. �� LT. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . jTRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1=6 =9 69 1 THRU C8' 2295 619 RIGHT 62 118 142 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF:: HOUR FACTOF. NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY e 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 6 400 79 7C4 LEFT 4. 0 ► �_ LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 1'6 39 69 61 ADJUSTED VOL 2 0 0 CAPACITY 0 64 55 MOVEMENT NO OK Of< OK PARSONS E{R I NCF=::ERHOFF C F: I T I C A L M O V E MEN T A N A L Y S I S 0F;AHAM ST/ HE I L AVE F= M 1_0NCG TERM ALT _ C� DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4 4 CRITICAL N/S VOL 4 4 3 CRITICAL E/W VOL 3 8- CRITICAL SUM 7 8 6 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. o RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. c 2 L. . 12. ii L. . 12. 0 LT. 12. 0 LT. 1,71 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES t NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND �69 71 ��i LEFT 1 THRU 28 295 626 62)0 RIGHT 62 121 142 40 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF--: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 .1 i PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH SO SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 36 403 -8' 1 LEFT Z_ i 0 i LEFT TURN CHECK. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 13.6 =9 71 61 ADJUSTED VOL U �? CAPACITY i� 67 52 MOVEMENT NO OK OK OF: r F'AF:SONS ERF: I NCF-==EF HOFF=- CF; I T I CAL_ MOVEMENT ANALYS I S GF;AHAM ST / HE I L AVE LONG TERM NO F'F:O JCT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4 2'f_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 3 9 2 CRITICAL E/W VOL :=.67 CRITICAL SUM 7 5 9 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. o RT. 15. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12.0 LT. 12. LT. 12. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 1 4 '9 67 61 THRU 279 79(:) 596 �7(, RIGHT 6 115 140 40 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAf:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 1 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY e 1 . 0 — 99 (#FEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT ._,92 ?67 ?06 LEFT 0 Q G C LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 134 39 67 61 ADJUSTED VOL 0 cD ii CAPACITY 0 60 61 ;, MOVEMENT OFF: OF: OK Ok:: i F'AF2SONS E-cF-i I hlCk==ERHOF=F= CR I T I CAL MC) .JEMEhJT ANALYS I S GF;ZAHAM ST /HE I L. A%JE F=M LONG TERM ALT _ DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4 4'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 4cDt CRITICAL E/W VOL =-9 CRITICAL SUM _7 9 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. o RT. 15. 0 RT. 1C. � 2 L. . 1 . 0 L. . 12. 0 LT. 121. 0 LT. I.. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT I -6 9 09 1 r THRU 283 295 644 64? RIGHT 62 lie 142 Y�� TRUCES (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1. NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH Bo SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 336 400 =92 47 LEFT 0 0 LEFT TURN CHECK; NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 136 39 69 61 ADJUSTED VOL 2 o 0 CAPACITY C) 64 49 r MOVEMENT NO OK:: 0{ OF: F'AFRSOnlS E-cF< I F :EFR"C)F=F= CR I T I CAL MOVEMEhJT ANAI_YS I S CCF29=6H006M ST /HE I LL AVE NEAF7 T'EF<M NO F•F<O,JCT DATE: 2/227/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION _m 7 CRITICAL N/S VOL Z 4 6 CRITICAL E/W VOL 1 2!6 CRITICAL SUM 6 7 2 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. �� L. . 14. 4 L. . 1?. 0 LT. 12.0 LT. 1�. �? 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 117 56 51 THRU Chi 240 j 480 RIGHT 52) 97 118 74 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 • 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 T .95 EASTBOUND 5 3 • 95 WESTBOUND 53 . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 , ci — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8C) SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT '?91 346 =26 =7' LEFT . 0 Q C LEFT TURN CHECK, 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 113 713 56 51 1 ADJUSTED VOL `_' CAPACITY 55 53 MOVEMENT OF: OK. OK: Of. F'AF;:SONS EiF: I 1%4Cf=-:ER1--iOFF C R I T I (--A L M C)V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S CGFZ M ST/ HE I LL AVE NEAT. TERM W / F'FRC)0 TE DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 1 E3 CRITICAL N/S VOL 1Z5c� CRITICAL E/W VOL 1'?6 CRITICAL SUM 676 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 T. i5. 0 L. . 12. (D L. . 12. (7 LT. 12. o LT. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WE'STDCUND LEFT 113 _ _ 56i THRU 235 244 502 -,.L C) RIGHT 52 97 118 TRUCF::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) REAP:: HOUR FN -TOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . i) - 99 (#F•EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT I� NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND, THRU -RIGHT 296 350 326 _. _ LEFT 0 (j LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 11.= 56 ADJUSTED VOL 0 C) C CAPACITY ) 54 53 MOVEMENT Ok: Of' OK* OF F'AFtiSONS EeF2 I NCF=':EF;:"C31 "F- C F? I T I C A L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S EiOLSA CH I CA /F'='EAFiCE F}M LONG TERM ALT _ Et DATE: 2/ 7/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4 2 CRITICAL N/S VOL 6 7 2 CRITICAL E/W VOL 8 7 CRITICAL SUM 7 9 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTDOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. (--) RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. o RTL if. Cl ? T. . 112. 0 T. . 12. o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ L. . 1�. C) T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WES-BOUND LEFT 40 117 74 THRU 1 1 1 0 1799 5 R I GHT 4�t 145 61 TRUCF:::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . ti — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 574 672" 722 87 LEFT i i tj q i t LEFT TURN CHECK. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 4ti 117 74 ADJUSTED VOL 1:1 C) i? CAPACITY 98 C) i MOVEMENT 0F': OK 0K OF F'AFtiSONS EcFti. I NCJ•=:_E;F; �c iF'F=- CF1 I T I CAL MOVEMENT RNAI_V'8 I S FlMLLSA CH I C0=6JF'FEE AFRCE F'M LONG TEF�M ALT - C� DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4 CRITICAL N/S VOL 6 7 8 CRITICAL E/W VOL Ica CRITICAL SUM 7 4 8 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. C) RTL 1C. 2 T. . 12. T. . 12. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . T. . 12.. . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUP11) LEFT 4i� 67 74 THRU 1119 1814 _ RIGHT 40 145 61 4_. TRUCf`'S (%i LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAT::: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . i) - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH So SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 579 678 7(:) JJ LEFT p 0 i) LEFT TURN CHECK. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 40 67 74 ADJUSTED VOL 0 q CAPACITY 99 15 ? j MOVEMENT OK OF::: OF' OF . r PARSONS EcR I NCF :EF;:"C:)F=F= C R I T I C A L M O%%J E M E N T A N A L Y S I S � rHOLSA CH I CA / P'EARCE LONG TERM NO F='ROJ CT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION .M 9 CRITICAL N/S VOL eS:M(D CRITICAL E/W VOL 7t=� CRITICAL SUM 7C3c3 LANE GEOMETRY rNORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUhdD LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 R1L 1C. O 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 L. 1Z. 0 .. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . rTRAFFIC VOLUMES 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 40 67 74 THRU 1 C)2 1675 RIGHT 40 145 61 _ TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR F-C70R NORTHBOUND 5 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY o 1 . 0 — 99 (#FEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 53�1 650 7(D LEFT 0 c i i� LEFT TURN CHECK rNORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 40 67 74 ADJUSTED VOL C) U �� CAPACITY 99 15 MOVEMENT Ok': OK oil Ot' r F='ink FRSONS E{Ft I hICF===EF_�HOF F CF7 I T I CAL MOVEMEM-r ANALYS I 8 F3OLSA CH I CA / F'EAF;ZCE F'M LONG TEF;:P1 ALT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION 4::s 1% CRITICAL N/S VOL 6 8 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL 8 9 CRITICAL SUM 7-7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. �i RTL 15. 0 RTL 15 T. . 12. �� T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. �� T. . 12. Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . • • • . . . . • . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES r NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 4�i 12(D 74 61 THRU 1 14) 1825 5 6 RIGHT 98 145 61 �E TRUCK':S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HCUR FACTOR. NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 33OUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 71 1 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . o - 99 (#BEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 617 681 72 89 LEFT (j i) LEFT TURN CHECK; NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND r INPUT VOLUME 40 12U 74 61 ADJUSTED VOL 0 o CAPACITY ) 64 1 MOVEMENT OK; OK': OK OK' ' ' F'AF:SOhIS E-cFR I hlCf :EF:B--ICOFF C R I T I C A L— M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S ' SOLSA CF-1I CA /F?EAf=:CE NEAFR TEF~M f40 F•F::O�JCT ' DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE A ' SATURATION =•1 X CRITICAL N/S VOL 5- CRITICAL E/W VOL S- ' CRITICAL SUM 5 9 5 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ' 1 RT. 1 5. o RT. 15. (--) RTL 15. 0 RTL iC. T. . 12'. T. . 1'2. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 1 . . 0T. . 1C. �? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 4 L. . 12. �� 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNL LEFT _4 56 62 19 ' THRU 755 1"9 2 q. RIGHT '4 TRUCF;::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAk:: HOUR FACTOR ' NORTHBOUND 5 = . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 .95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED ' PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . C-) - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8i? SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 416 52 6= �' ' LEFT 0 i� G i LEFT TURN CHECK ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 74 56 6 19 ' ADJUSTED VOL 1) 0 o CAPACITY c) 116 1 MOVEMENT Ok:: OF'•: OK: OF:_ F'AF;�OSCD E-�F;: Y "C:CF=-:E:F, 1 (DF=-F- ' CFR I T I CAL Ma MEP4T Ah4AL_ .Y'3 I C EcOLSA CH I CA / F=EAF~CFEE N FEE AF;Z TERM W F=•F<C3 J EC� DATE: 2/27/97 LEVEL OF SERVICE A SATURATION CRITICAL N/S VOL ;Z5 E ' CRITICAL E/W VOL 6 1 CRITICAL SUM 6�12 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RTL 15. 0 RTL 15. 01 ? T. . 12. i) T. . 12. i) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. (:) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT '4 56 62 19 ' THRU 861 1410 2 A. RIGHT 74 12' 51 76 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR ' NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 ' EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED ' E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . C-) - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' THRU -RIGHT 472 55B 6= LEFT O 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME =4 56 62 19 ADJUSTED VOL CAPACITY 0 86 17, MOVEMENT OF-:: 0K OK 1 F='ink F;SONS E-4F: I NCE==:EF:H(DFF= CF;: I T I CAI_ M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S ' WAFtNEF;Z AVE / GRAHAM ST _ LONG TERM ALT _ �{ DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 E3 CRITICAL N/S VOL 6.;7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 8 E3 1 ' CRITICAL SUM 1 t!;2C-3 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ' 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. o RT. 15. 0 RT. 15l. C T. . 12. 0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12. 0 T. . i . 4 L. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT = 17.9 125 `?1 THRU 1 1 190 2�!49 1 E?� RIGHT 12<? 1155 260 99 TRUCF S ('!.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF:: HOUR P ACTOP ' NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED ' PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . C-) — 99 (#F'EDS i'HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 216 298 795 8ln' ' LEFT "9 8 i) c> LEFT TURN CHECF`: ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 3.53. 139 125 81 ADJUSTED VOL 37:.9 8 i) C' ' CAPACITY i) 421 0 S8 MOVEMENT N/A OK. OF.: O}: . 1 P*AF15C3tVS E-cF;z I M(7-1�___F—=-F;:"CDF=F=- ' CFR I T I CAL MC3WEMEhJT FAkfVALV'E; I E; WAFZNEF2 AWE / C3FtAHAM E;T _ LONG TEF--ZM AL_-' _ DATE: 2/27/87 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 9'%_ I CRITICAL N/S VOL b' 7 CRITICAL E/W VOL E3 8 7 CRITICAL SUM 1 .c,^4 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. ;:; ' 2 T. . 12. �� L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. T. . 12. �� L. . 12. �� . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 L. . 1C. I 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. �� . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WF_STc:OI�Nj ' LEFT 139 125 0_ THRU 7.11 190 =o55 i 6: ' RIGHT 1__0 1 15 26Q ' TRUCF`:S (%) LOCAL RUSES (#/HR) F'EAk:: HO"JR F ,T OF° NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 ' S0UTH90UND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 ' PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . i) - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) ' CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTL�OJNc THRU -RIGHT 216 298 797 887 LEFT ':19 8 i i ' LEFT TURN CHECF: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME 3,5= 139 125 81 ADJUSTED VOL ' 9 8 CAPACITY 421 -! ' MOVEMENT N/A Oki OF.*: OK PARSONS E-cR I NCf- EF�HOF-F C R I T I C A L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S 1 3 WARNER AVE / GF;ZAHAM LONG TERM NO F'FiOJ ECT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 1 '/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 6='? CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 S CRITICAL SUM 1 =S 7 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH ' 1 RT. 15. o RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 1 2 T. . 12. G L. . 12. ) T. . 12. 0 T. . 1 4 L. . 12. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT S 1'7 121 1 THRU 71 11 190 1879 ' RIGHT 12i) 11c) 260 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAk:: HOUR FAC70R' ' NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 3 1 ' WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED ' PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY e 1 . o — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 216 29= 776 755 LEFT .79 4 C? LEFT TURN CHECK: ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 353 1=7 11 1 81 ADJUSTED VOL 339 4 0 Cl ' CAPACITY c? 416 IQ MOVEMENT N/A OK Ole; Ok: F'AF2S0NS E4FC I hi(ZE--FEE R"OFE , CR I T I CAI.._ MOwEMENT ink N ink L_VE3 I S WARNER AVE/ CGRAHAM ST _ LONG TEEM ALT _ DATE: 2/27/87 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 8% ' CRITICAL N/S VOL 6 3 7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 8 7 c-', CRITICAL SUM I .tS -7 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 2 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 1'?. c; L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 L. . In. �� ' 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES , NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' LEFT S 1'9 125 81 THRU '1 1 190 165C' RIGHT 120 115 260 99 ' TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 ' SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 ' PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . o — 99 (#PEDS/HR) ' CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 216 298 789 87C, LEFT =9 8 0 ii ' LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND i INPUT VOLUME =53 139 125 81 ADJUSTED VOL -79 8 cj CAPACITY 0 421 o 81 ' MOVEMENT N/A OK, OK 0k:: ' F'AF:SONS E-CF: I RB(--F==:FEE F"C3F-F- C F2 I T I C A L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S ' WARNER AVE / ES FR omk"PkM NEAF< TEEM NO F'F;C3 J ECT ' DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE B ' SATURATION 6 7 CRITICAL N/S VOL 5M;C=D CRITICAL E/W VOL 6 C-')4 ' CRITICAL SUM I 1 c 4 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. RT. 15. Co 2 T. . 12. o L. . 12. 0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12. C, 4 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 2.97 115 97 ,S ' THRU ^62 16C) 1=91 if-)02. RIGHT 1C)1 89 2�19 3 TRUCE'S (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk: HOUR FACYOF, NORTHBOUND 5 = . 95 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 ' WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED ' FEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . o — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 192 258 58 6C?4 LEFT 292 c) i; LEFT TURN CHECK iNORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 297 115 97 68 ' ADJUSTED VOL 292 C) i C) CAPACITY 0 3,58 0 21 MOVEMENT N/A 0F: OK Of: F='AFZSONS EcF< I NCf=_:EFZHOFF ' C Fi I T I (--Oct L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S WARNER AVE/GRAHAM NEAR TERM W / F='FROJ FEE C—IF ' DATE: 2/27/87 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 7 1 CRITICAL N/S VOL n; 4 CRITICAL E/W VOL 4=P71 CRITICAL SUM 1 =E!; ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15.0 RT. 15. o RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. J) ? T. . 1-. C.) L. . 12. (_-) T. . 12. 0 T. . ice. f, L. . 12. o . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 L. . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' LEFT C97 115 102 S THRU -262 16C) 1582 1 _'.?•_ RIGHT 101 9 219 8C ' TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F•EAF-'' HOUR FACTCF-' NORTHBOUND 5 . 95 ' SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 ' PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) ' CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 1912 262 65:1 6'1 LEFT C) ' LEFT TURN CHECk'.: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME 2'97 115 102 68 ADJUSTED VOL 2)92 i C) CAPACITY o 3562 18 ' MOVEMENT N/A OF; OK OF::: 1 F'AF;:SONS BFR I MCCF EFtiHOFF CFi I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANALLY!S I S B O L S A C H I C A / H E I L L O N G T R M A L T _ C W ! M I T ' DATE: 2/27/B7 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 CRITICAL N/S VOL 8 t:5 4 CRITICAL E/W VOL 4 8 ' CRITICAL SUM 1 4 2 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. C-) RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. C) 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 1 . ' 7 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12:i� L. . 7'. 0 4 L. . 1 2. i) T. . 12. o 5 . . . . . . . L. . 112. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 219 328 279 1-'2 THRU 1 C) 171 426 '90 ' RIGHT 1'4 542 115 18" TRUCF`:S ('/.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK. HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 1 ' WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) ' PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY e 1 . 0 — 99 (#REDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 400 66:_+ 271 291 LEFT 191 '12 257 140 LEFT TURN CHECK. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND . EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 219 328 279 172 ADJUSTED VOL 191 312 257 140 CAPACITY ) 791 C) 4-76 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A F•AFiSONS EtF;: I NCk;EFiF--IOFF ' CF2 I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANAI_YS I S WAF7NEF7 AVE /GRAHAM ST E X I ST I N(3 F*M F•EAF,:: ' DATE: 7/14/86 , LEVEL OF SERVICE 3B SATURATION S 9 CRITICAL N/S VOL 4-77 CRITICAL E/W VOL t54CD CRITICAL SUM 1 Cil 1 7 LANE GEOMETRY ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH I RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. I5.0 RT. 15. c_) T. . 12. 0 L. . 12.0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 1 In. Ci L. . 12. �� . . . . . . . T. . 12.0 L. . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . , TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 5�i 97 82 5 THRU 21 1.35 1193 914 ' RIGHT 85 75 184 69 TRUCH::S (%> LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 3 . 91 ' SOUTHBOUND 5 3 .91 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 91 WESTBOUND 5 3 . 91 ' PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 1 . NEITHER TURN PROTECTED , FEDEStRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 170 229 522 540 , LEFT 248 0 G i LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME 250 97 82 57 ADJUSTED VOL 248 0 C.) 0 ' CAPACITY ► 307 i) 18 MOVEMENT N/A OK OK OK F='ARSONS DR I NCF==:EFtiHOFF CF2 I T I CALL M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S ' HOLLSA CH I CA /HE I L LONG TFtM ALT _ B W /M I T DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 6 CRITICAL N/S VOL 8 6 E CRITICAL E/W VOL c 4 S CRITICAL SUM 1 4 1 -_ti LANE GEOMETRY ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 2 T. . 12. q T. . 12. 0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12. () T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12, 0 L. . 12. i) 5 . . . . L. . 12.0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 218 =18 279 1 THRU 1 ►47 175f) 426 '`?8 ' RIGHT 1'4 542 114 181 TRUCf::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk:: HOUR: FACTOR ' NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND _ 1 WESTBOUND PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH e0 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 408 678 270 7s8 LEFT 19Q _�00 257 140 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 218 18 279 172 . ADJUSTED VOL 190 3(�() 257 140 CAPACITY c.) 791 0 426 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A PARSONS SF: I NCB :ERHOF'P ' C:F: I T I CAL MOVEMERJT A ALLYS I S 1BC3L-S024 CH I CA / HE I tL F•M LONG TERM ALT _ C DATE: 2/27/87 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE F= SATURATION 12 '/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 2 9 7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 6 8 6 CRITICAL SUM 1 9 8.1 ' LANE GEOMETRY , NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 2 T. . 11. 0 T. . 1^c.0 T. . 1 Z. T. . 12. T. . I2. i_� T. . 12. �� L. . 12. 0 L. . 4 L. . 121. 0 L. . 12.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,, TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTIBOUND ' LEFT 219 '28 279 THRU 1��2' 1717 426 RIGHT 174 542 115 167 TRUCF':S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'E,1k:: HOUR FAC-70R NORTHBOUND 5 1 ' SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT , NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 400 768 271 42= LEFT 529 312 257 77 ' LEFT TURN CHECKK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME 219 328 279 172 ADJUSTED VOL 529 312 257 77 CAPACITY ii 897 Q 41 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A Of': F'AF;:SOtVS3 EcFti I tVCF=:EFRHOF=F= CFt I T I CAL_ MOVEMENT AhJAL_YS I S ' BOLSA CHI CA/ HE I L_ L_OtVCG TF:ZM AL_T _ A W DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 f:p'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL E3 8 CRITICAL E/W VOL ' CRITICAL SUM 1 4^4 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. i> RT. T. . 12. o T. . 12. o T. . 12. U T. . ' T. : 12+:? T. . 12ci t, . . i . .(.� I. . . 1 . . .' 4 L. 12 �� T. 1-4. �� 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBCUNZ LEFT 216 -11 27S' - •S� ' THRU 1:�71 1786 428 RIGHT 126 542 111 1 `a TRUCk:S (X) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAf' HOUR ,=ACITOR NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 ' WESTBOUND PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTFOUND THRU —RIGHT 414 692 287 LEFT 188 29.E 257 1 _ LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 216 =11 279 168 ADJUSTED VOL 188 29 257 1'= CAPACITY Q 791 o 426 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A F'AFiSONS E- F=< I I\JCf _E:FR"CiFF' CFl< I I I CAL MCiVEMENT RNAL_YS I S BOLSA CH I CA /HE I L F'M LONG TEF2M ALT DATE: 2/27/87 , LEVEL OF SERVICE F' SATURATION 1 2 1 % , CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 14- CRITICAL E/W VOL 6 8 6 CRITICAL SUM 1 9 S 9 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND , LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 ' 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. <.� 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT _219 '18 279 17- THRU 1 047 1750 426 'S'9 , RIGHT 1'4 542 114 181 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK. HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 ' SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 , PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT , NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -EIGHT 408 781 270 429 LEFT 522 '00 257 77 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME 218 318 279 172 ADJUSTED VOL 522 .-�p00 257 77 CAPACITY 0 895 C-) 410 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A Ok; I PARSONS E{FR I "C:Pz==EFtiF-9OFP CR I T I CAL_ MOVEMENT ANAL_YS I S ' SOL_SA CH I CA /HE I L_ L_ONG TRM NO PRO W / M I T DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 1 CRITICAL N/S VOL 7 9 6 CRITICAL E/W VOL t!;4 V CRITICAL SUM 1 =56 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH i1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. o RT. 15. O RT. 1G. 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o L. . 12.0 . . . . 0 L. 1 ' 4 L. . 12. o T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 204 =05 279 �o 1 THRU 749 1602 424 7 RIGHT 126 542 9' 7� TRUCK-.S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK`: HOUR FACT'DR NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) E/W :4. BOTH TURNS PROTECTED (WITH OVERLAP) PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS ' CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBGUND ' THRU -RIGHT 372 621 259 26- LEFT 175 286 257 1" LEFT TURN CHECK ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 204 305 279 166 ' ADJUSTED VOL 175 286 257 1 = CAPACITY 0 791 0 426 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A N/A i F=•AFRSONS E-cF;: I hJCE E:F;: C;F=I:::- CF? I T I CAL MOVEMEMT ANAL-YS3 I C FiOL.._E3 CH I CA/ HE I L_ F=•M L_ONG TEF;:M AL_T DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F= SATURATION 1 ^ 1 1% ' CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 CRITICAL E/W VOL 6 8 9 CRITICAL SUM 1 9 9 2 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 1=. T. . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . T. . 1C. :) T. . 121. o L. . 12. 0 L. _ iC. t- 4 L. . 1.. . . . . 1. . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 216 7r11 ?79 1 THRU 1<)7]. 1786 4 . 8 SIGHT 126 5422 111 TRUCk:S (;:) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF:: HOUR Fi^iCTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 , SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND PHASING N/S- : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH eo SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THR!� -RIGHT 414 793 270 4'22 LEFT 510 1-793 C57 65 ' LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME 216 11 279 166 ADJUSTED VOL 510 29' 257. 65 CAPACITY o 889 o 419 , MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OK: F•AFiSONS EiFR I NCI =:EF•:"C3 F=F CF: I T I CAL_ MOVEMENT ANALY'S I c-3 ' i SOLSA CH I CA / HE I t_ F•M NEAP. TERM W / F•FiO,J CT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 76'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL eS47 CRITICAL E/W VOL ' CRITICAL SUM 1 ^4 E3 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. RT. 15. o RT. 15. 0 R. . I—. - 2 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. i, ' T. . T. . 12:i� �, . . 1�. .� L. . . . . . 4 L. 12. t� L. 12 �� 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 172 257 =5 4" THRU 799 1=49 =57 = 1 RIGHT 1(-.)6 456 73 14—j TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK' HOUR F;C:TOR NORTHBOUND 5 = . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 9'S WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N!S : ?. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . t_) — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 30 647 270 791 LEFT 245 246 LEFT TURN CHECK. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 172 257 2 5 ADJUSTED VOL 245 246 220 CAPACITY 0 562 tj 71 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OF: F'AFRSONS E-cFR I "Cf EF; HOiFF CFI I T I CAL_ MOR,.JEM FEE NT ANAL—YS I S BCILLSA CH I CA /HE I L_ L_ONG TERM NO F'F:%-*O.J ECT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F= SATURATION 1 1 2'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 1 1 6:M CRITICAL E/W VOL 6E3!5 CRITICAL SUM 1 E 4 E , LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. 0 , T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. i) T. . 12. Q T. . 12. o L. . 12. 0 L. . 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 204 305 279 1-=6 THRU 949 160*2 4 24 R I GHT 126 542 9.' i 2 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAf: HOUR r^CT3R, NORTHBOUND 5 1 SOUTHBCUND 5 1 EAST_-.0UND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 729 259 4-8 LEFT 434 286 257 65 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ' INPUT VOLUME 2o4 3.05 279 166 ADJUSTED VOL 4 3.4 286 257 65 ' CAPACITY i 791 426 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OK. F='AF:;:SONS EgFR I "C:F=;EF7<"C)F=F" CFI I T I C A L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S ISOLSA CH I CA / HE I L AVE E X I ST I NC F=.M F=-EA1-:- IDATE: 7/14/86 LEVEL OF SERVICE E"i I SATURATION 6. CRITICAL N/S VOL t5 L CRITICAL E/W VOL L 2 CRITICAL SUM 1 Cy7n LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15.0 RT. 15.0 RT. 15. 0 F:. . 12. 0 2 T. . 1 . 0 T. . 12.0 T. . 12. �) T. . 1 2 .0 T. . 12.ci T. . 12. 0 L. . 12.0 L. , 12. 0 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12.0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES INORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 121 216 198 112 THRU 609 1 093 3 01 281 R I GHT G9 .384 50 122 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk:: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 _. . 91 SOUTHBOUND 5 . 91 EASTBOUND 5 . 91 WESTBOUND 3 . 91 PHASING N/S :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED I PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY o 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 266 553 195 7 LEFT 0 207 185 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 121 216 198 lie ADJUSTED VOL 0 207 185 0 ' CAPACITY 0 287 0 3:-27 MOVEMENT OK N/A N/A OK F'AFiSOLVS E -cFi I NCF _EF;:HOFF CF;: I T I (--AL_ MOVEMENT AtVALYS I E3 EBOLL$A CH I CA/ HE I L_ LVEAFz TE1-iM NO F'F:C30 FEE CT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURATION 7 4 CRITICAL N/S VOL CRITICAL E/W VOL 6Cl 1 CRITICAL SUM 1 :22eS LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. (_; RT. 15. C) RT. 15. o R.. . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. Q T. . 12.0 T. . 12. T. . 12. C) T. . 12. U L. . 12. �? L. . = 4 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTECUND LEFT 143 257 2�5 _ THRU 71i) 1'?9 357 RIGHT 106 456 58 14'5 TRUCk':S (%? LOCAL BUSES (#/FIR) PEAK: HOUF.. FI^ICTQF' NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 ' SOUTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 EASTE OUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) ' CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 298 625 22o 781 LEFT 53 246 11 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND , INPUT VOLUME 1477 257 2 31 5 140 ADJUSTED VOL 53 246 CAPACITY 0 '80 o '01 MOVEMENT NO N/A N/A OF:: PARSONS E{F=i I NCF==:EFit--IOFF CF;� I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANAI_YS I S SOLSA CH I CA/ WAPNEP F'M LONG TEF;:M AL_T _ C DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F SATURATION 140 1 CRITICAL N/S VOL 8 9 9 CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 7 CRITICAL SUM 1 6 7 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. o R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. q R. . 12. R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. �� T. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . T. . 12. C) T. . 12. CI T. . 4 12. :� L. . 12. o L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. C� 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1169 =1= 1=4 THRU 157 242 1526 12`C i R'I GHT 96 617 40 I TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAF`: HOUR FACTOR I NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION ' E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 249 266 545 477 LEFT 42 650 295 ci LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1169 =13 1=4 ' ADJUSTED VOL 42 1239 295 C) CAPACITY C) 68 227 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OE' . 1 P*PkF;:SOhIS E4Fti I DACE=:EF:;I saFF CF2 I T I CAI_ MOVEMENT APJAL'`rS I S L9OLSA CH I CA / WAF2NEFi LNG TM ALT C W / M I T , DATE: 2/27/87 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE IJ SATURATION 8 E3% CRITICAL N/S VOL E3^4!LP CRITICAL E/W VOL Ea? 1 CRITICAL SUM 14t5-7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNID i LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12. o R. . 112). 0 RT. 15. o R. . 1-. _ 2 T. . 1 . 0 R. . 12�. 0 T. . 1?. (:) T. . 7. L. . 121. o T. . 12. T. . 1'2. 0 T. �. 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 T. . 1=. 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . L. . 1=. .. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES , NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTSOUrJr: LEFT 84 1169 '1' THRU 157 -242 152)6 12 RIGHT 96 61' 4C) . _. TRUCk::S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F'EAE:: HOOF` r�C =F. NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 176 C66 545 4^' LEFT 42 650 154 LEFT TURN CHECP:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1169 Z13, 1'4 ADJUSTED VOL 42 12'9 295 CAPACITY 0 68 ar, MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A Ck: F'AFRSONS EeF;: I NCF-=_:EF;z"OF=F= C R I T I C A L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S BOLLSA CH I CA/ WAF;ZNEFZ F=>M LQNG TEFZZM ALT _ Ec DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE Fz SATURATION 1 C? 1 '/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL E3c9Cl CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 7 CRITICAL SUM 1 6 6 1 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 112. 0 RT. 15. 0 P. . 1-7. L. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 1�. T. . 12. 0 T. . 11-7. 0 T. . 1 . . . . . . . 4 L. . 121. 0 L. . 12. �� T. . 1�. :� 5 . . . . . . . L. . 1.2. 0 . . . . . . . L. . ice. i 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1154 '1= 1 . THRU 157 242 1524 17--8 RIGHT 96 61= 40 71S TRUCE<:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR F^CT-) NORTHBOUND 5 :1 1 SOUTHBOUND _ 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . 0 — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 249 266 544 477 LEFT 4 641 2295 LEFT TURN CHECk:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1 154 7.1.3 174 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1222 295 CAF'AC I TY i 0 67 �S MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OF: PARSONS SF: I h 1=—:RHCDF F CFi I T I CAL_ MOVEMENT ANALYS I S F�OL_SA CH I CA / WARNER L_P4CG -I M ALT _ F3 W / M I _T_ DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 8 CRITICAL N/S VOL 8 1 7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 4f:b=N 1 CRITICAL SUM 1 4 4 8 LANE GEOMETRY , NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12. (--) R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. (--) R. . 12. �? ? T. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. T. . T. . 12. o T. . 12. 0 T. . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. T. . 12. 0 5 . . . . . . . C 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT CS 1 154 '1 1-4 THRU 1157 242 1524 4220 RIGHT 96 617- 40 'lo TRUCk::S (::) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK: HOUR FAC'OR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 ' SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 3 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . i) — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH SO SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 176 266 544 t7 LEFT 42 641 154 LEFT TURN CHECK'.* NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND j INPUT VOLUME 94 1 154 1' 17.4 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1222 CAPACITY 0 ci 67 27 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK: F'AFiSONS EsVi I NCF:::EF:-<f—IOFF ' C R I T I C A L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S B�MLSA CH I CA /WAFihJEFi F'M LONG TEFiM ink L_ _ A DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE F" SATURATION 1 C31 CRITICAL N/S VOL E3 9 8 CRITICAL E/W VOL 79Cll CRITICAL SUM 1 6 8 8 ' LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. o R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 1-. 2 L. 12. 0 R. . 12. ii T. . 12. T. . 12, c; . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. G T. . 12. :1 4 L. . 12.0 L. . 12. o T 1 . (-, 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 4 . . . . . . . L. . 1-. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1167 _ 4 THRU 157 242 1504 1:2 1 RIGHT 96 626 4�� TRUC�-::S ('!.) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) F,EAF::: HOUR FACTOR NORTHBOUND 5 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 _ 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . i) — 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH Bo SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT 249 266 537 472 LEFT 42) 649 318 Ci LEFT TURN CHECF:: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1167 374 174 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1237 '18 CAPACITY 0 65 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OF' F'AFtSONS Eel I NCF':EFIHOFF CFt I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANAL_YE3 I S , F—�OLSA CH I CA /WAFtNEFt LNG TM ALT _ A W ! M I T DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 9 CRITICAL N/S VOL 82t.r CRITICAL E/W VOL 6 =8 CRITICAL SUM 146- LANE GEOMETRY ' NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 P.. . R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12. ? T. . 12. o R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o T. . 1C. ''' L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o T. . 12. 0 T. . 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12.o L. . 12. o T. . 12. j 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1167 3:7.4 1.7-4 THRU 157 242 1504 122 16 RIGHT 96 6-26 40 TRUCE'S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAk'. HOUR FACT'jR NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . 0 - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH SO SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 176 266 537 472 LEFT 42 649 166 i! LEFT TURN CHECK: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1167 4 1'4 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1237 18 CAPACITY 65 101 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A Ok: F='AF=iSONS EiF;: I NCk=:EFR"C:)FF= CF-< I T I CAL MOVEMENT ink NALYS I S E;OLSA CH I CA /WAFINEF;Z LONG TEEM NO F='F;:O,1 CT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION 95 CRITICAL N/S VOL 8:22 2 CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 4 CRITICAL SUM 16 7 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. .15. C? R. . 12. 0 RT. 15. 0 R. . 1C. ;j C L. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. C? T. . 12. C. . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 1�. < 4 L. . .12. o L 12. 0 T. : 12. <'* . . . . . . . i 5 L. 12. o L. 12 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1U36 5 _ ' r THRU 157 242 1454 11 I GHT 96 607 4C i TRUCES ('l.) LOCAL BUSES (#:HR) F'EAk: HOUR F ACTOF° NORTHBOUND 5 = 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 1 EASTBOUND 5 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ 1 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . i) - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 84 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 249 266 520 1.59 LEFT 42 57= 286 Cl LEFT TURN CHECk; NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 1436 7o5 1'4 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1092 286 C CAPACITY 61 225 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OK. F`O=t SONS E-:FR I f\ICF= EF:"C3FO -r' GF=R I T I CAL_ MOVEMENT ANALYS I E3 BOL_SA CH I CA f WAF;ZNEFR L_LVG TM LVO F=•F=1O W f M I T DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION E3=_ V_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 7 4 9 CRITICAL E/W VOL 6C'39 CRITICAL SUM 1 -=:t58 LANE GEOMETRY i NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 R. . 12. f-) R. . 12. C) RT. 15. 0 R. . T. . 1 . C) R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 0 T. . 1�. 0 T L. . 12. C1 T. . 12. �� T. . 12. 0 T. . 1?. '' 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. �� L. . 12. 0 T. . 12. 2 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. 0 L. . 12. 0 L: . C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 84 1 i�'6 705 1.-4 THF:U 157 242 1454 1SC RIGHT 96 607 40 TRUCf`:S ( ) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAf<: HCIU'F: FACT0F. 1 NORTHBOUND 5 _ 1 SOUTHBOUND 5 EASTBOUND 5 _ 1 WESTBOUND 5 _ i PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . C) - 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 176 266 52) 459 LEFT 42 577 150 C� LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 84 14.36 7.U5 17.4 ADJUSTED VOL 42 1(.-)92 286 0 CAPACITY o 897 61 39 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A OF': F'ARSOt.JS E-sR I "C� F FEE:F:"CiEE CFi I T I CAL MOVEMENT" ink NAL_YS I S BBOL_SA CH I CA/ WARNER NEAR TERM W / F•F:C30 ECT' DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE E SATURATION 9 2'l_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 7 CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 9 1 CRITICAL SUM 1 n; 1 6 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. C.) R. . 12. C) RT. 15. 0 RT. 15. 2 L. . 12. R. . 12. (:,j T. . 12. c) T. . . . . , . . . T. : 12:i; T. : 12:C; T. . 1 �.4 L. 1 �7 L. 12 o L. 1� i; 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. �) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUNE _EFT 71 372 257 1 _ _ THRU 1'2 2C)4 1224 -7 RIGHT 21 511 '4 5 0 TRUCKS (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAK HOUR FA.C71]F' ' NORTHBOUND 5 = . ?5 SOUTHBOUND 5 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . - 99 (#PEDS/HR , CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 222 2 8 461 545 LEFT 50-T 246 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 71 872 257 117. ADJUSTED VOL 70 959 246 C. CAPACITY o "" MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A 0f`: F'AF:SONS EcF< I NCF<E:F:HOF"F C F7 I T I C A L M O V E M E N T A N A L Y S I S B9OLS4=4 CH I CA /WAFiNEFi NEAF2 TM W/F'F20 W / M I T DATE: 2/27/87 ' LEVEL OF SERVICE D SATURATION 8 4 CRITICAL N/S VOL 7!2!E!; CRITICAL E/W VOL e63-t5.=: CRITICAL SUM 1 -378 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTS'CUND LONE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 F.T. 15. R. . 12. �� RT. 15. 0 R. . 1�. (i 2 L. . 12. 0 R. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o T. . 12. T. . 12. 0 T. . 12. o T. . 12. 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12. C) L. . 12. ii T. . 12. >> 5 . . . . . . . L. . 12. C) . . . . . . . L. . 1- 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTSCUND LEFT 71 872 -57 11 THRU i Y2 2��4 1224 =7- RIGHT 81 511 =4 TRUCf:S (%? LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEA&:: HOUR. Fr=ACTOR ' NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND S _ . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W : 2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY : 1 . o - 99 (#F'EDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU -RIGHT 22 238 461 407 LEFT _,o 507 246 LEFT TURN CHECk: NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND INPUT VOLUME 71 872 257 it ADJUSTED VOL '(:) 959 246 i CAPACITY U 0 54 192 MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A ]F:: F=•AF:;:SONS EiF2 I NCF=: EF=�HC7F-F CFi I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANAI_-_YS I S E{OLSA CH I CA/ WAF:ZNEF;Z EX I ST I NC F•M F'EAIk DATE: 7/ 14/86 LEVEL OF SERVICE 1E) SATURATION 8 E3% CRITICAL N/S VOL eS;i I CRITICAL E/W VOL S 4 15 CRITICAL SUM 1 4 4 b LANE GEOMETRY NORIHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 1 R. . 12. C-) RT. 15. (--) RT. 15. C) L. . 12.0 R. . 1'2.0 T. . 12.0 T. . 1 .. C� . . . . . . . T. . 12. 0 L. . 12.0 L. . lc. C� 4 . . . . . . . L. . 12.0 L. . 12. C� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LEFT 6C1 c82 216 95 T HPU ill 17 1006 8C�2 R.I GH T 68 4•., 29 76 TRUCk:S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) PEAH' HOUR FACTOR 1101 l HBOUND 5 . 91 �uUTH90UND . 91 EASTBOUND 5 3 . 91 WESTBOUND 5 = . 91 PHASING N/S :5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W :2. HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY . 1 . C) - 99 (#PEDS/HR) (�'r CLE LENGTH 80 SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU --RIGHT 197 211 569 638 LEFT 18 4o4 207 0 LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND PUT VOLUME 6(-) 682 216 95 ADJUSIE:D VOL 18 771 207 �> APAC I T Y C C) i-) 276 OVEMENT N/A N/A N/A Ok:: I F'AF;ZSONS FeFR I NC1-_:EF:HOFF= CFR I T I CAL MOVEMENT ANAI_YS I S 1BOL_SA CH I CA / WAF2NEFR NEAF4 TEEM NO F'F:C30 CT DATE: 2/27/87 LEVEL OF SERVICE ID SATURATION 8E:P'/_ CRITICAL N/S VOL 6 8 CRITICAL E/W VOL 7 7 CRITICAL SUM 1 4 1 9 LANE GEOMETRY NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND LANE MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH MOV WIDTH 1 RT. 15. 0 R. . 12.0 RT. 15. 0 RT. 1 . C? L. . 1C. i) R. . 12. U T. . 1C. 4 T. . � . . T. . T. . T. . 1�• 4 . . . . . . . L. . 1-. 0 L. . 1�. o L. . 1 cj . . . . . . . L. . 12). 0 . . . . . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TRAFFIC VOLUMES NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEST B-� ._�1D LEFT ,1 2257 THRU 1 C -2 04 1 19C) _ R I 13HT O 1 51 1 _4 TRUCF;S (%) LOCAL BUSES (#/HR) FEAk: HOUF FACTCR NORTHBOUND 5 _ . 95 SOUTHBOUND 5 . 95 EASTBOUND 5 _ . 95 WESTBOUND 5 _ . 95 PHASING N/S : 5. DIRECTION SEPARATION E/W HEAVIEST TURN PROTECTED PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY 1 . o — 99 (#PEDS/HR) CYCLE LENGTH 8(? SECONDS CRITICAL LANE VOLUMES BY MOVEMENT NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND THRU —RIGHT CCU 28 449 t9 LEFT -o 460 246 -� LEFT TURN CHECK NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WEcTBOU,,ID INPUT VOLUME 71 8<il 257 1171 ADJUSTED VOL �X) 877 2246 C) CAPACITY ) 26G MOVEMENT N/A N/A N/A Oh:' U II A z w a a ass i ,w it MAW r m w as " air aft m m = "I r INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: GRAHAM ST EAST-WEST STREET: HEIL AVE TIME : 4 : 00-5 : OOP DATE : 07-02-86 ----------------- ; 78 ; 185 ; 27 ; Total 22 ; 39 ; 7 ; 1st 20 ; 46 ; 6 ; 2nd ; -18 -44 --8 ; 3rd 18 ; 56 ; 6 ; 4th Rt . ; Lt V ! -------------------------- Rt . 1 7 ; 5 ; 5 ; 11 ; ; 28 ; <-- 85 ; 97 ; 102 ; 101 ; ; 385 ; Total 1st 2nd 3rd -4th Lt . ; ---9�- 10 ; 9 ; 13 ; ; ---41 : --- --------- 38 ; ; 13 ; 9 ; 8 ; 8 ; Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 423 ; ; 89 ; 99 ; 120 ; 115 ; ---> - 112�� 32 ; 25 : 29 ; 26 ; Rt . ------------------ ' ---�--- ; Rt . , 1st ; 26 ; 47 ; 13 ; 2nd ; 20 ; 44 ; 8 3rd ; --25- ; --51- ; -- 12- ; 4th ; 27 ; 60 ; 10 ; =a=aa ; a=aa= ; aaaaa ; Total 98 _ 43 - ----- ; ---- INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: GRAHAM ST EAST-WEST STREET : HEIL AVE TIME : 5 : 00-6 : OOP DATE : 07-02-86 : ---------------- 82 ; 192 ; 31 ; Total 21 ; 54 ; 7 ; 1st 24 : 45 7 : 2nd 19 ; 47 ; 8 ; 3rd 18 ; 46 ; 9 ; 4th Rt . : Lt . V i -------------------------- Rt . : 3 : 10 : 5 : 6 : : 24 : < --- : 111 ! 101 ; 91 : 871 : 390 : jTotal 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . ! 9 ; 9 : 12 ; 15 : ; 45 ; ------------------------- ; -------------------------- --53 ; : 17 ! 9 ; 13 ; 14 : Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 407 : : 112 : 99 : 97 : 99 : ---> ---95��- 29 : 24 : 20 : 22 Rt . ------------------ ' Lt . : Rt . ----------------- : ist : 26 : 53 : 17 : 2nd 22 : 41 : 9 : 3rd : 20 40 : 8 4th : 17 ; 37 : 6 : Total 85 : 171 40 1 ' INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: GRAHAM ST EAST-WEST STREET: WARNER AVE TIME : 4 : 00-5 : OOP DATE : 07-03-86 ; ---------------- 68 ; 128 102 Total 25 ; 37 28 ; 1st 10 ; 25 ; 24 ; 2nd ; - 19 ; -29 ; -26 ; 3rd 19 ; 37 24 4th ------------- -- Rt . L V ------------------------- Rt . ; -58 ; -25 ; -20 ; - 19 ; ; -122 ; < -- 1 201 : 241 ; 228 ; 240 ; ; 910 : Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . ; 46 ; 13 ; 13 ; 13 ; ; 85 ;-- 57 ; ; 20 ; 18 ; 10 ; 9 ; Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1218 ; ; 266 ; 275 ; 330 '. 347 ; ---> 175� ; 40 ; 44 ; 44 ; 471 Rt .- Lt .- -------------- 1st ; 37 ; 24 ; 26 2nd ; 33 ; 10 ; 10 3rd ; -33- ; --31 ; -19 ; 4th ; 39 ; 48 ; 20 Total ; 142 ; 113 1 75 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: GRAHAM ST EAST-WEST STREET: WARNER AVE TIME : 5 : 00-6 : OOP DATE : 07-03-86 -74 ; 138 ; 93 1 Total i 20 ; 40 ; 24 ; 1st 19 ; 25 ; 24 ; 2nd 17- i --33- ; 25 1 3rd 18 ; 40 ; 20 ; 4th ----------------- Rt . i Lt . V - - - -- -------------------- - - Rt . : 8 ; 17 : 25 : 24 ; ; 11 , < -- 252 ; 221 : 201 : 889 ; Total 1st 2nd 3rd 44h Lt . : 12 : 15 ; 17 : 27 ; : 71 : : -------------- - ---- - - - - • -- - - - -------------------- 93 ; 33 '. 18 ; 20 : L -+ . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 108E ; , 334 ; 275 ; 237 ; 242 ; ---> 183 , : 52 ; 43 : 42 : 46 : Rt . - - ------ ----------- ------ : Lt . ---Rt�- 1st i 101 104 ; 26 2nd i 78 i 39 ; 20 ; 3rd i 32 30- 1 -- 19- ; 4th ; 33 ; 9 9 i Total ; 244 1 182 ; 74 1 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: BOLSA CHICA ST EAST-WEST STREET: WARNER AVE TIME : 4 : 00-5 : OOP DATE : 07-03-86 ----------------- : : 393 : 109 : 607 ; Total 89 : 18 ; 172 ; 1st 108 ; 30 ; 123 ; 2nd --93- ; --30- ; -139 ! 3rd 103 ; 31 ; 173 4th ----------------- : Rt . Lt . V 1 1 ------------------------- Rt . : 77 : 731 80 : 94 : ; 324 ; < -- 192 : 213 : 228 : 185 : ; 818 : Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . ! 251 22 : 371 17 : : 101 : 253 : : 77 : 651 49 : 62 ; Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1085 : : 287 : 286 : 256 ; 256 : ---> ' 51 : ; 12 ; 19 : 10 : 10 : Rt . : -------------------------- : 1st ; 10 : 27 15 : : ----- ----- : ----- ; 2nd 12 : 32 : 20 : 3rd : -19 : -27 : - 18 : 4th ; 12 : 25 : 16 : Total : 53 : 111 ; 69 1 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: BOLSA CHICA ST EAST-WEST STREET: WARNER AVE ' TIME : 5 : 00-6 : OOP DATE : 07-03-86 ----------------- 1 425 1 176 ; 658 ; Total 99 1 48 ; 187 ; 1st 1 97 1 42 ; 138 ; 2nd 131 1 51 ; 184 ; 3rd 98 ; 35 ; 149 1 4th ----------------- Rt . ; Lt . V -------------------------- Rt . : 97 ; 86 ; 99 ; 79 ; 1 3611 <--- ; 1761 2181 2231 22511 842 ; Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . ; 32 ; 171 291 23 ; 1 101 ; 1911 ; 551 421 57 ; 371 Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 93811 276 ; 2311 2431 1881 ---> 1 ; 1 --- -251 � 61 8 ; 5 ; 6 ; Rt . Lt . ; Rt . 1st 1 20 1 33 1 22 2nd 1 12 1 26 ; 13 3rd 1 16 1 27 1 17 4th 1 13 ; 32 ; 17 ; Total ; 61 ; 118 1 69 1 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: BOLSA CHICA ST EAST-WEST STREET: PEARCE ST TIME : 4 : 00-5 : OOP DATE : 07-03-86 ----------------- ; 78 ; 895 ; 27 ; Total 16 ; 183 ; 6 ; 1st 20 ; 205 ; 7 ; 2nd ; -23 ; 231 ; --5 ; 3rd 19 ; 276 ; 9 ; 4th ----------------- Rt ; Lt V ------------------------- Rt . ; 3 ; 5 ; 5 ; 9 ; ; 22 ; <-- 0 ; 1 ; 0 ; 0 ; ; 1 ; Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . ; 3 ; 4 ; 2 ; 5 ; : 14 ; 52 ; ; 10 ; 13 ; 15 ; 14 '. Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 31, ; 1 ; 0 ; 2 ; 0 ; ---> 49 ; ; 9 ; 11 ; 15 ; 14 ; Rt .-- Lt . ; ----Rt . - 1st ; 3 ; 125 ; 5 2nd ; 4 ; 133 ; 7 ' 3rd 1 ---6- � -196- � - 5 4th ; 5 ; 164 ; 8 Total ; 18 1 568 ; 25 1 INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH , CA . r NORTH-SOUTH STREET: BOLSA CHICA ST EAST-WEST STREET: PEARCE ST TIME : 5 : 00-6 : OOP DATE : 07-03-86 ----------------- 110 ; 1097 ; 50 ; Total 23 287 ; 12 ; 1st 27 ; 261 ; 14 ; 2nd 34 ; 311 ; 12 ; 3rd 26 ; 238 ; 12 ; 4th ---------------- Rt Lt V ------------------------- Rt . ; 7 , 5 ; 9 ; 9 ; ; 30 ; <-- 0 ; 1 ; 2 ; 0 ; ; 3 ; Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . ; 3 ; 1 ; 7 ; 5 ; ; 16 ; 50 ; ; 7 ; 23 ; 8 ; 12 ; Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 5 ; ; 1 ; 0 ; 1 ; 3 ; ---> ; 41� -; 10 , 11 ; 8 ; 12 , Rt ._-- Lt . ; Rt . ----------------- 1st ; 8 ; 169 8 2nd ; 6 ; 164 ; 5 ; 3rd � 10 � - 151- f - 8 4th ; 6 ; 146 ; 6 ; Total ; 30 ; 630 ; 27 ----------------- INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: BOLSA CHICA ST EAST-WEST STREET: HEIL AVE TIME : 4 : 00-5 : OOP DATE : 07-02-86 ; 312 ; 902 ; 208 ; Total 65 ; 186 ; 44 ; 1st ; 71 ; 254 ; 54 ; 2nd --48 248 ; -52 ; 3rd 78 ; 214 ; 58 ; 4th ----------------- Rt . ; Lt V -------------------------- 1 Rt . ; 24 ; 26 : 28 ; 28 ; ; 106 ; 1 --- ; ; ---- <--- ; 63 ; 56 ; 67 ; 68 ; ; 254 ; Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . ! 25 ; 19 ; 19 ; 24 ; ; 87 ; 192 ; ; 46 ; 44 ; 52 ; 50 ; Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 235 ; ; 58 ; 461 75 : 56 ; ---> 43� ; 12 ; 12 : Ill. Rt .-- , Lt . ---- ; ----Rt . 15t ; 27 ; 148 ; 30 2nd ; 28 ; 171 ; 21 3rd ; --24 ; 125 ; -18 ; 4th ; 23 ; 150 ; 14 Total ; 102-=-594 83 ---- INTERSECTION TURNING COUNT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES- NEWPORT BEACH, CA . NORTH-SOUTH STREET: BOLSA CHICA ST EAST-WEST STREET: HEIL AVE TIME : 5 : 00-6 : OOP DATE : 07-02-86 ---------------- 405 ; 1171 ; 192 ; Total ; xxxxx ; x===� ; oaaxx ; 96 ; 273 ; 57 ; 1st 94 ; 246 49 ; 2nd 116 ; 360 ; 52 ; 3rd ; 99 ; 292 ; 34 4th ----------------- Rt . ; Lt . V Rt . ; 24 ; 41 ; 29 ; 31 ; ; 125 ; < -- 76 ; 72 ; 65 ; 85 ; ; 298 ; Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Lt . , 33 ; 31 ; 30 ; 231 ; 117 ; 1971 ; 51 ; 39 ; 58 ; 49 ; Lt . 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 309 ; ; 69 ; 72 ; 104 ; 64 ; ---> ; ---55 ; 1 15 ; 12 ; 15 ; 13 Rt . ' ' ------------------- ' Lt . ; Rt . ----------------- 1st ; 36 ; 160 ; 25 2nd ; 33 ; 147 ; 31 3rd ; 29 ; 152 ; 19 4th ; 33 ; 158 ; 30 ; aasas ; axaxa ; xxsza ; Total ; 131 ; 617 ; 105 ; TABLE A LEVELS OF SERVICE The concept of levels of service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists. A level-of-service definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined. They are given letter designations, from A to F, with Level of Service 'A' representing the best operating conditions and Level of Service 'F' the worst. Level of Volume/ Service Definition Capacity A Represents free flow. Individual users are virtually 0.00 - 0.60 unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort and conven- ience is excellent. B Is in the range of stable flow, but the presence of 0.61 - 0.70 other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from LOS W. The level of comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less than at LOS 'A', because the presence of others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior. C Is in the range of stable flow, but marks the 0.71 - 0.80 beginning of the range of flow in which the opera- tion of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the presence of others, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of the user. The general level of comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level. TABLE A LEVELS OF SERVICE (Continued) Level of Volume/ Service Definition Capacity D Represents high-density, but stable, flow. Speed 0.81 - 0.90 and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this level. E Represents operating conditions at or near the 0.91 - 100 capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver with the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedestrian to "give way" to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and driver frustration is generally high. Operations at this level are usually unstable, because small increases in flow or minor perturbations within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns. F Is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This over 1.00 condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Operations within the queue are char- acterized by stop-and-go waves, and they are ; extremely unstable. Vehicles may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more, then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board Special Report No. 209, Washington, D.C., 1985. 1 r r A A z w a a %i�r �► ow ;0 sr .ter "a p N N mr00 W�KNER s 3-7G —.0-oo/ I �oz 9is 21G 110060 PIK 2G V = v 0 NORTH H►�A TREET WA N AvE&1 E E— XISTit16 Fc—A\,< HooR VOLUMES W��NER u 03 y32 qy5 113 257 1190 34 — r- M co Q' col A J O NORTH E3oL5A Cvj%c.A STREET /v`JA(KNE2 A V ENu E TERM Wt--koo-r l R.OSECT �AK Hov2 voLuMES T N 00 —00/ 53$ 95 sololoillillillillilll 113 Z5-7 Liz H 3y v f M 00 z v J 0 NORTH jD BoL A CHtCA STv.EEE-r WA(ZrJF-9. �� NEAR Tc w►-rH PKOSEc-r PEAK HoU2 VOLUME S 0 T M WARNS-R �39 � I 2 13y =41E305 ILiSy 0 < T ~ v (p Z v Q J NORTH BoL-,A CHtcA STP.EET VJAK&JER =,E: UE LONCO TERM wvrHovT PRo3"F-CT PEAK HoUg \JoLUMES min ■i sir M; dw M" fii lot i* k*m. tier sr� air �r '00 mw ow aft so An as Li �,9 N I-- N T %19 ts N — �I�I A R NJ E R 1Z-7 1216 134 33ti I So000/ yo ep LP 07 z v 0 NORTH BoLSA C li tc A STrzE ET W�kRr�//��E2 VENUE I_oNG TERM AL-rFKMAT1�1E A PEAK HOUK. \IOLL)MES m ( 7 � N � - 1S � ZZ$ 13LA 313 I SZLi y0 v 00 u) T s v NORTH BoL-SA CHicA S-r�EET wA�n�Ef� QvENUE BI�� ® L ON6 TEP-M AL--rERNA'-lVG= Nook VoLOHES Awl on am am 'go � s4-9 _— WAr�NER -7Z7 IZ3o 13 3Is 1526 yo T r v `p U1 °- s A& NORTH BogySA CH ICA STV-EET VJAQ-NER \/EnjUE EmatkeAmM IL-oNG TEKM ALTER►vATiyE C PEAI` Houf- VouuMES Ej O �T PE A K C- E 30 3 I 52 2 43 00 T v N J O ccl NORTH BOLSA CHIGA S-r2EE-r G KEET LI!lLll� llll EX 1` T I N 6 PE Ay, H o u g vo L u M E S �rr� > ter; a� r■.. �r wr r j..� >� ..� M {l W Is r.Tl- N m_ Ln 3G � 9 �2 2 Ln �- i v J NORTH =ffhff NFMf TERM WI-FH oIJT I rZaTEC VEAK H002 voL-uMES � o � PE A R Cl E 3 Jm 19 G2 2- 11 51 � mom — o0 z J �.(0) ty` NORTH o SA CHICA S E E-f E/�fLC STfZE�T NEAR TFKM wrrH ?KoSEc-r FiFAK HouK V oLuMES , � r r T � � PC-A F, cJM - y3 5 23 -7y 3 �I G o OT l v Q 0 NORTH Bo L-SA CH ICA ST RCET EA 2GE EET LoM6 TERM vNJITHoUT ` RO-:s-E'CT 'PEAK NOUK \�OLUMES lf� l!� N o �_- cpN_ PEAR C.E �S � I �y 5 O o 00 v T T 0- v Q J 0 NORTH Boi-sA Cf-IICA STRIECT TLAP-CE i 2EE i Mrbr�Iftf L 0N6 Tegm At--rEFtjATlv E A LAK HL Vo��MCS r� rr: Ire r, r :ram �► Lo T r _ ClE �7 7 23 � y 5 O I v J NORTH OLSA CHICA STr-EET PEA Cc- ST2£E t �IlflC� Lone6 Team A L--Tep-tiR-rl iE BREAK �OvOJOLu M EES T Cp PE A K C— E 3 5 Z3 cr �y 3 � I Q Q v Q 0 CD. NORTH to GA CHICA STREET _A7P- STREET 1 C9�� nC lll L,ON6 -Fe:P-m �r�IA i IVE C AK TOUR VDLUMC- ,C � rr � .� a■�� r� .. r �.. r .� rIr r� .�� r � �r ,r�s rr (P T — co O N HEIL I Iz 2$1 19B 301 0 v 00 T 0 NORTH } Bn -SA CvAicA S EET HriaL VEm7e !All 1h1Q lUJ!!ll EX iST Im6 -F)E-AK HouR v-oLUMtS LnTtn VEIL_ � Nc�l ly5 33y Iy0 235 35� 5 T Y v J O NORTH BOLSq Ctj LCA STD-EE-r NEIL Avemut5 \ 'V NSA (, TE (ZM VATH0U-r ROSECT aA� HOOP, OLUMES .. �r ar �.. r.r r. .. >� .. +r r Ir ■t .. �■r ,r.r �r ,ems r Lo T Lf) 7 �' N HE I L ly5 33Li I �lo 235 3�7 I8 I J 0 A& co NORTH EmF $oL-SA GHic.A S--rP-ECT HGIL AvQIJUE he Q)M MEA2 TE RM WI-rH �i2DTECT PEAK Hoop- voLuM E S I N N Ul -T O HEI �L I"1Z 39- IGG 2-f 9 � 2y 93 O S N T v Q 0 NORTH T H L VEh1uE NU TERM Hou �R o ' C �Ef K Ho u� VuMEgoLSA CHiCA �T2EE m:�� Qmc El an MOM ow l=. fm m an m i M upI= M M M M We M m r = as m m m m m m � m N ,-g _ T cp He IL 1 -7 00 JIM i 2-79 y28 III Q 1— Y v J 0 NORTH a SoLSA CHicA S--r2EET HEiL AvEavuE � ll LoN6 TE F m ALTEp-rjATIV F A RA K H ooz VoLuM ES N � S HEIL I81 398 1 -7 Z 2 -7 9 y2� L4 T v O � - N - I - v Q J 0 NORTH �p Boy Sq C H iC A S-Tr-ge-T' HE I L- A vEnj VE l � LoN6 —Fe pm AL-,GKN A-rlvE S RAK Houk. " JoLUH ES �r �r � .� a�, � �r +w rIr +ram �+r �■r i■�I � ,� r � � _r r � ,r r a� � >.r �r r� � rt � +rr r r � s� �r ■rr N co co II II in r m 187 39�q 1 -72 2-79 92 115 N o m LT N J Mfl NORTH BOLSA CHIcA S e-C—ET HEiL- A7E1vuE BIB CAI ® LDPJ6 I FA1= HOU2 �Io MES cp o °p HEIL -IA 1 / k ) , N N 29 H oy y3 y1 Cl 23 9 � T T T �_ S I Q v A& NORTH HEIR vENvE GRAHAM S'rREE-r EXISTiN6 ovR \/oL U tAEl ES nu m air m m, m Im rm r m m -a � m � r iw r .r m m � m r ! 40 r as rs w r m um I� � r A rn E IL 39 Jq 1-I 8 O 5ro 50Z pis � � N N In Q Z QL i NORTH fp � HE ►L— A\j6,,,UE (,e.AHA l��s9l1 �1lllulUJi�ll NEA►Z I,2M W►-rNo�-r STK ETH Hoop, o .UE aT'EC� �EAKv r ? � � N � HEIL 3y 0 i 5 6 502 Ln 118 � m � - N Q OL NORTH fD �� HEAL A\je ju[ 67HAM STREET 1LJ��J1QlQliW lLll�Li�l� ® NEAR, I E P-M VJ1TH PE A K Ho Li IK V OL u M E S r �r =, r s r Mart �r �r r� ►� r I Fl t � � t1EIL y0 570 jlq GI 67 5 r, Iy0 T � cal m N � Q z Q NORTH LON6 TEr-M WIZ'Hov-T I�KoSECT 1 OAK Hou/L voL UM r-S 00 Q- I IL N yo 3 CI G9 4Ppt— ► Lf � N � Z ac NORTH Ei L- vE►vvE 67AHAM S—,-EE i c LoN6 TEP-m AL--VEP-NA-f-WE A BF-AY-- NouR- voL0P-4E rr .� r art r M am it 10 i r rs r r rr r r � w r m m win s m m m m m oo�l T El C � Q- H E. IL HO O5 Col G9 GI lLi2 ,L9 cv � — N z Q NORTH 1tgw� Elms- AvENUE 6jZA HAMQS i f-EE"T 11SSBIQ1h(&eAuU1..11l �-oN6 TERM AL-FE9tJA-FiVC- �J PEAV. HoufZ ""10LUMES U-) N � � HE- I L- yO TIq ZO co 71 Ir �26 ly2 � � N Q z v NORTH 10 E I L vE&vuE 6" AM STREET B w1 BRAMM Lo►JE TERM AL--rE?,[-JA-rt\/E C R£AK Hou(Z Vd�uME5 EE I WARNER (09 91y 1193 lqy O � N N CP A& NORTH ftma ARrJE R \jriWE 67kA NAM STczE ET bKkeflas Ex ISTIN6 A HcuR \�oLuMES (T' In Op C2 Io68 �43 97 1391pn Z19 rN � � o � N N Q Z Q NORTH W AK JE� r2 YErJ vE 6ZAHA ST(Z£ET Emra:c1hA@ffl NEAR TEAM w�TH��T l K��cT PEAK Ho�� Vo�uM�S m m r mAm M m C) L W P�I�NER 8Z Sm I 99G GS IOZ 1582 219 r N _ N tv - pL NORTH Emra:c WAV- 9, AvENuE 6P-AHAM STREETn�C IUJIIll NEA12 TE(ZM w,JvrH Pfz-oSEcT PEK A 1IaufZ \/oLuMES \ p o r q7 Jq $ l 121 8 79 26o M p � � N Q Q NORTH WA?,,,J A\4 i=- t\j of /6P-AWAM ST2EET' LoNE, TePeM WITH OUT oSEGT �PE,qK �4oUg- VOLUMES Mao no 4m M no M w 4m M ww Loocr 99 icso SI � 25 Zo32 2Go c� p 1 NORTH �� l� w��r•�E� AvEn»E �AHq STK.EET CN,ke llmN LoN6 ` EKm ALTef-fJA-F,qE A Fem4 4ouR \�oLuMES N O 6 W �1R N ER �19 1675 `3 1 125 2 oy9 Z6o I � � N Q 1 a NORTH Av Ea: ENvE 6tzf�0AM �Tf.E E TLoN�i T� M AL-rE�Nl�-r vE PEAK, ouK \Io uMES �rlr = w ■r m � r r. r r +ter ,r .r .� .r ,.■. �1r M r M w r m r m m r m m m m m r oo m m L, o �- W A�N EEz 99 Jq IG.$3 � I 125 2055 2 Go c(1 p LO — N Q NORTH t � � aR►QEP- AvENuE 6r-AHAM S-me6'T ll�AMMMll lll1SM L o rat 6 7E i.M AL-i c K Q A-r �v E C �E�4 K �o u tZ �Ic�L u]ME]4S]Ej �i � � �-r Q z w a a i w i w i w � i i i w i i i w r i i i APPENDIX TABLE E MEADOWLARK TRIP GENERATION FOR APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL AND CITY PROPOSED LAND USES LAND USE SCENARIOS APPLICANTS CITY - #1 CITY - #2 CITY - #3 CITY - #4 UNITS/ TRIP RATE # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF # OF LAND USE ACRE RATE UNIT UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS ; RESIDENTIAL ; LOW 7.0 9.0 D.U. 357 3213 227 2043 MEDIUM 15.0 8-77.0 D.U. 450 3150 300 2100 825 5775 ; �r s. 6 , lN1� HIGH 25.0 5.0 D.U. 375 1875 MOBILE HOME 9.0 4.8 D.U. 585 2808 90 432 SENIOR CITIZEN 3.3 D.U. 250 825 ; COMMERCIAL ---- 600.0 ACRE 14 8400 10 6000 10 6000 ; TOTAL 14250 2808 3645 10143 11775 a, DC A z w a a 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 12-1979 Figure 9-1C ' TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS BOLSA CH►CA /PEARCE ST. - NEAF, TERM (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic — See Not* 2) vJ 1-r OU r,c S1= CT URBAN......_....__........RURAL......_..........__.... Minimum Requirements EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular ' Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per dayon higher— street (total of both volume minor-street approach approaches) (one direction only) Number of tones for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Ur♦rm Rrrr.l Urban Rural 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,690 2 or more �aPO: 1 . . . !i.y PQ. . . . . . . 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 or more . . 2 or more . . 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher— street (total of both volume minor-street approach Satisfied Not Satisfied approaches) (one direction only) Humberof lanes for mo Yin g traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Urban Rural Urban Rural 1 . . . . . / 1 . . 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 or more .3��b 1 .�.,.� O� 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more . . . . . . . . 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 14,400 10.080 1,600 1,120 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Combination Satisfied Not Satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one warrant satisfied but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more.-__ 1 2 NOTE: 1. Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if a separate signal phase is to be provided for the left-turn movement. 2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. TS-1i'1`C I 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 12-1979 ' Figure 9-1C TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS HE I L. AVE /GRAHAM ST. - NF- A?, TERM ' (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic — See Note 2) W +a o u P S C , URBAN......_ ...__._._.....RURAL..................__.._ Minimum Requirements EADT , 1. Minimum Vehicular cu Satisfied � ` Not Satisfied Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per doyonhigher— street (total of both volume minor-streetopprooch approaches) (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Urb.e Rorel Urban Rural ' 1 . . . 9.r.5.00 . . . . . 8,OOo 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 or more . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 , 2 or more . . . . . . . . 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher— street (total of both volume minor-street approach Satisfied Not Satisfied approaches) (one direction only) Num6erof lanes formoving trafficon each approach I I Major Street Minor Street Ur6on Rural Urban Rural 1 . . !71. .9 Q.Q. . . 1 . . .9, 5QQ . . . . . . 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 or more . . . . . . . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 , 2 or more . . . . . . . . 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 14,400 10.080 1,600 1,120 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Com6ination Satisfied Not Satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants ' No one warrant satisfied but following warrants ' fulfilled 80ro or more...... 1 2 NOTE: 1. Left turn movements from the major street may 6e included with minor street volumes if a separate signal phase is to 6e provided for the left-turn movement. 2. To 6e used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot 6e counted. TS t(>-C , j 9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual ' 12-1979 FlQuro 9-1 C TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS R k d E 1. IgVEAlI I E /P120-3tCT ACCc5 S -NEf}IR TE1�/''I (Based on Estimated Avero9e Daily Traffic — See Note 2) WITO PRO CCT URBAN_._...._X........___RURAL__...................... Minimum Requirements i EADT 1. Minimum Vehicular Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles per day on major Vehicles perdayon higher— street (total of both volume minor-street approach approaches) (one direction only) ' Num6er of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Urbee Revel Ur6on Rural 1 . . . . . 1 . . 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 ' 2 or more .3g1.3QO: 1 . .`7!j.Z00 . . . . . . . . 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 or more 2 or more . 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 2 o► more . . . . . . . . . . . 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher— , Satisfied Not Satisfied street (total of both volume minor-street approach approaches) (one direction only) Num6erof lanes formoving traffic on each approach Major Street Minor Street Ur6on Rural Urban Rural 1 . . . . . 1 . . . . . . 12,000 8,400 1,200 850 2 or more .3.9 3OU 1 . y ?�.�. . . . . . 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more . . . . . . . . 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 14,4D0 10.080 1,600 1,120 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 or more . . . . . . . . . . . 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 i 3. Com6ination Satisfied Not Satisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one warrant satisfied but following warrants fulfilled 80 0 or more____ 1 2 ' NOTE: 1. Left turn movements from the major street may 6e included with minor street volumes if a separate signal phase is to 6e provided for the left-tum movement. 2. To 6e used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot 6e counted. 1 TS-1C1-C C7 pC A z w a a �J Ave. 1 � r � c T4 ON CR �I ¢ u LL �f gq� 71 LL J L Q. I � v i I . .■■ �.ov+r�ucEs b ' ■ 4o H ei I E I DOw CR I --r C GA ■ Warner'' v 1 � a Access Voi,n+ McDjo o Icw-K Airpor si+i� Access A I-terria+i ve. A —j L-7-j— Tat rOA"3NUI Q J V W 3 ' 3 r y• � V r .. W Y V Tj• Z � 03 ■■■■/■■Y■■■■■/■■■ �'�� 7 L r . p5i-i00td V"103a LIOLV 1Wd TT __l.. ........................ ■ 4 .2 + ; .6 Hel Ave. 14.4 ■ TA ON at • ■ t) • T RESIDENTIAL ' J L CX. WQOQ> ■ • I 1.2 co r� w c i leis■ T 1 C7 SENIOR CITIZEN (.8) ■ MEAaow ca ■ 3.2 ■ ■ ■ COMMERCIAL: � � ■ 1.4 4.8 Wamer Ave. 6.6 6.4 ' XX IN THOUSANDS T = TRANSITION AREA - OPEN SPACE/LOW DENSITY MEADOWLARK AIRPORT SITE RESIDENTIAL ■MIN= CONCEPTUAL ROADWAY CONCEPTUAL ROADWAYS AND ALIGNMENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC FOR PROPOSED PROJECT (XX) .TRIPS GENERATED BY USE (?b 3 LLUJ wui ar av on AZ 1 - - - R00%Y E LT La nt � � Z • e. 0 � K n pint. o ,p TO►•rEnuvCN �7l b 9i7,e ��•w�r 6 LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT 87= 2C Environmental impactReport 87-2 - a F} Ua(1a-dIFa u � eLfj I-h C,41 Clex 0 C. -4e.., �%MwMMw--" huntingeon beach department of 1 fj development services Land Use Categories AMENDMENTS OT ] E�NUIL AS REII MTfiE -6] 126-6 469 PRESIDENTIAL 6 B o 9-291i 1202 11-]--]] 45i $`O`y - � � 9 - Estate 52U Q-6a] I" 12-19a4 451 z Estate 53Un/gac B-I-]B 1232 8-21-R 4660 Estate 54un/gaC p4]-]8 1236 II-6-]6 4696 /', u-z1-]e Q39 Q-16-]B ame ��:;.::. _ E3 Low Density 35-T9 Q42 3-19-]9 4865 / _ 3-IB-60 1291 4-)-80 4865 C _Medium Density p-zl-eo I26B p-IS-8p 4936 __/ �\ t" a'° Medium High Density 5-19-Ep 12]3 12-15-61 5053 EAN OIFGO i0.FE / High Density 11-3-81 Q]8 12-]-81 5053 um H u-v-el 12]9 Iz,81 5060 �^b o -$@n10f Residential 2-20*82 5206 - \ 12-1-82 1299 2-7-83 5223 / I">j;, 4-19-B.3 1303 5 Ni-83 52.5 / / \ ' F - COMMERCIAL 0-4-63 1314 11 2"3 5321 12-6-83 135 13 84 5341 General 4-3-84 IN/ 5-]-84 53T3 \ N-5 64 545]A / \ �r Visitor Serving p-Ni-84 1333 1119-84 -` \ } 6-4-'I 1.4 1-T-65 5457C 35] 6-I - - _ - Off iceProfessional 1-22-86 1349 2-I]-65 553z 8 -86 5639 5-6-e6 1 6-2-86 ssro I _ � MIXED USES t Mixed Develo n M Office/Residential C 0 mmercial/Support Recreation ..:-... INDUSTRIAL i-ii:-;: General _ - _ ✓ \ Resource Production -' .... = Industrial EnergyProduction / OPEN SPACE Offil Water Sk rjq Conservation :n,:- re�Rec ation OTHER USES 4�Et r: ED PublicQuasi-Public,lnstitutional Solid Waste Facility Planned Community Planning Reserve Coastal Zone Boundary Conservation Overlay : PACIFIC COAST PACIFIC PACIFIC OCEAN PLAN ERAL ® HUNTINGTON BE4CH CALIFORNIA LANDNUSE DIAGRAM PLANNING DIVISION Adopted December1976 µ Revised JUNE 1986 L t t EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Land Use Element 87-2c addresses Area of Concern 2 . 1 Area 2 . 1 - Meadowlark Airport Area of Concern 2 . 1 is a request by the Nerio family to redesignate 65 acres located on the north side of Warner Avenue, south side of Heil Avenue and 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street, from Low Density Residential to General Commercial and Medium, Medium High and Senior Residential . Staff generally supports the applicant ' s request because it will result in an efficient mixed use development . Staff modified the request in Alternative 6, the recommended alternative, because it decreases the overall densities, is more compatible with surrounding land uses and reduces traffic, air quality and noise impacts . A low density residential area was included adjacent to existing single family dwellings to act as a buffer. The Senior Residential portion of this alternative has been placed outside of the study area to increase compatibility with adjacent land uses and to decrease the overall density of the study area. Special attention was given to traffic and sewage concerns . Area 2 . 2 Northeast Corner of Intersection of Gothard Street and Center Drive. West of Huntington Center Addressed in Land Use Element 87-2a . Q � p i Z� wwr swt *a .wrs e / .owrua�s / �nuru 2.1 L. U .E. 87-2 AREAS OF CONCERN huntington beach planning division TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1. 1 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 . 0 AREAS OF CONCERN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 . 1 Meadowlark Airport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 . 1. 1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 . 1.2 History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2 . 1 .3 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2 . 1 .3 . 1 Land Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2 . 1. 3 .2 Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2 . 1 . 3 . 3 Economic Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2 . 1.3 .4 Public Services and Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2 . 1. 3 . 5 Traffic and Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2 . 1.3 . 6 Environmental Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2 . 1. 2 . 7 Regional Airport/Air Traffic Impacts . . . . . . . 39 2 . 1.4 Staff Recommendation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2 .2 Northwest Corner of Gothard . . . . . . . . . . . . Street and Center Drive. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 2 . 2 . 1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 2 . 2 .2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 2 .2 . 2 . 1 Land Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 2 .2 .2 .2 Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 2 . 2 . 2 . 3 Economic Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 2 .2 .2 .4 Public Services and Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2 . 2 . 2 . 5 Traffic and Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 2 . 2 .2 . 0 Environmental Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 2 .2 .2 . 7 Staff Recommendation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3 . 1 Short-Term and Long-Term Productivity . . . . . . . 57 3 . 2 Irreversible Environmental Changes . . . . . . . . 58 3 .3 Growth Inducing Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 *Area of Concern 2 .2, The Orange County Transportation District Golden West Transportation Center, is addressed in Land Use Element 87-2a and is not included in this report . i APPENDICES l Appendix A General Assumptions : Area 2 . 1 Appendix B Fiscal Impact Model : Technical Appendices Appendix C Meadowlark Market Report Outline: Area 2 . 1 Appendix D Traffic: Levels of Service Area 2 . 1 Appendix E Traffic: Analysis of Adjacent Proposed Development : Area 2 . 1 Appendix F Traffic: Trip Generation: Area 2 . 1 Appendix G Air Quality Calculations : Area 2 . 1 Appendix H Results of Preliminary Soil Investigation: Area 2 . 1 Appendix I Regional Airport/Air Traffic Impacts Responses : Area 2 . 1 Appendix J Initial Study Appendix K Comments and Responses : Area 2 . 1 ii "v LIST OF TABLES PAGE NO. 1 . Meadowlark Airport Accidents 1980 through 1986 7 2 . Alternative Land Use Concepts: Area 2 . 1 10 3 . Student Generation: Area 2 . 1 22 4 . Existing Arterial Level of Service for Study Area: Area 2 . 1 26 5 . Future Arterial Level of Service for Study Area : Area 2 . 1 28 6 . Near Term Afternoon Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service: Area 2 . 1 29 7 . Long Term Afternoon Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service: Area 2 . 1 31 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Existing Zoning: Area 2 . 1 4 i 2 . General Plan Designations : Area 2 . 1 5 3 . Land Use Alternatives : Area 2 . 1 11 4 . Suggested Internal Street System: Area 2 . 1 33 i 5 . Study Area Including the Bolsa Fairview and Newport Inglewood Faults : Area 2 . 1 37 iii � I 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report concerns Amendment 87-2 to the Land Use Element of the Huntington Beach General Plan. The Land Use Element was adopted as a mandated element of the General Plan in December, 1973 ; this is the thirty-first amendment to the element . Planned land uses throughout the City are depicted in the attached Land Use Diagram. 1. 1 Methodology This amendment concerns changes in General Plan designations on two sites . These sites (Areas 2 . 1 and 2 . 2) are covered by Environmental Impact Report 87-2 contained in this document . The amendment requests for Areas 2 . 1 and 2 . 2 will be analyzed in terms of the existing conditions on the site, major land use, circulation and environmental issues, and consistency with adopted City goals and policies . (0588D) -1- Section 15148 of the State EIR Guidelines states that "The requirements for an EIR on a local general plan element or amendment thereof will be satisfied by the general plan or element document and no separate EIR will be required if : 1) the general plan addresses all the points required to be in an EIR by Article 9 of the State EIR Guidelines, and 2) the document contains a special section or a cover sheet identifying where the general plan document addresses each of the points required. " In conformance with State guidelines, this document will constitute the EIRs for Land Use Element Amendment 87-2 . The environmental setting and significant impacts associated with the issue areas identified in the initial study are addressed under Areas of Concern (Sections 2 . 1 and 2 . 2) . Alternative land use designations and feasible mitigation measures to minimize significant effects are also discussed in this section. Section 3 . 0 addresses overall environmental changes related to the following considerations : 1) the relationship between local short-term productivity; 2) irreversible or unavoidable environmental changes; and 3) growth inducing impacts . (0588D) -2- 2.0 AREAS OF CONCERN 2 . 1 MEADOWLARK AIRPORT 2 . 1 . 1 Background Area of concern 2 . 1 is a request by the Nerio family to redesignate 65 acres located on the north side of Warner Avenue, south side of Heil Avenue and 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street from Low Density Residential to General Commercial and Medium, Medium High and Senior Residential . The property is owned by the Nerio family. As indicated in Figures 1 and 2, the 65 acre site is designated as Low Density Residential on the General Plan which is implemented by (Q) MH, qualified mobile home zoning. The property is currently used as a small craft airport for business and recreational fliers . Incidental uses include a flight school, cafe, aircraft service, and repair facility. One single family dwelling also exists on the site. In September, 1980, City Council granted a zone change request for Meadowlark (ZC 80-7) changing the land use designation from Low Density Residential, R-1, to Mobile Home, MH. Fifteen months after the zone change, the applicant requested General Plan Amendment 81-2B which would designate the site for General Commercial and Medium Density Residential land uses . The request was later withdrawn. (0588D) -3- AREAS OF CONCERN MAP EXISTING ZONING —_. "'_. _ __ -I RI RI RI RI RI RI RI oRl I RI �I RI DR I 0__-_— u a z o L u o o s ......... RI = i i NARSMALL z DR Q RI TOOOriY y0' =r a a o a a o i a /+ c < o z o J RI v R C4 C2 a CILIENTE OR W YIODLEC I Off g DR y C MH RI RI RI $ RI .= _« �— - RI R I R I R I I-FP2 f •vE- HEIL, is �a d R2 KCR RI RI-FP2FP2 CR 2 R2 C4 RI K o . RI-FP2 ':" R2 f �2 R2 R2 MH RI RI R3 I FP2 sc:? _ a RI-FP2 OR I r- RI RI ROS a ,..�a 5S\LLDI Q CF- R _ �= R N R I-FP2 a R2 IcF_R R2 �g RI RI RI RI --- — DONLYN '• riURZl2U „ v.�R2 �R2 "' RI R2 RI RI 01FRANYAR C R2 R2 ST 0 R TN a a 1 ' ROS 01 M \8 R `v( z � EDMONDS CA N �R2 R2 R2 R , -.� R2 RI r �= DILDRED DR 0 I m (Q)R * RI I b cr R if I ��. RI_J NILO ST R3 1a60'. ' h O ROS—FP2 ` TROPHY DR R3 C2 R4: ^ RI-FP2 R3 R3 z R3 -� y. �_. r r C ca =cr <vlRl ER o C4-FP2 > c g 0 4 — -4—.. _R5 ".......,.......;r .•. -FP2 -- i- --- WARNER - - ...- -- - ---- I (0)-c RI s RI g — 31 R3 i t t== L D RADO OR, j ROCERS �CR �R3 R3 yyl Ca R2R2f� RI 'RI . . C4 21) ` _ I 1 � RI PEN LE`ON U << ., R2 R: C 2 rl 3� i RI RI R3-23 "bA, RI RI39 I EXISTING ZONING AREA 2 ,1 * This area has been added to Alternative 6. HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION —4— FIGURE 2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Ix I jib: a oL�— -- r-- it 1 I I Q .. Qw ..T _.. UI CAL Ew OR MIDDLE:OFF I LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I ` - CAI I j I I J HEIL y Im1 M E D. j GErIERAL MED , i I F RNDEN , cR COMMERCIAL DEN . � I RES . , .. RES . SuDO OR � I "; •'... ::' :: : ::::::::::J.. :: C F- R Vi5 4 OR, • ON s tF. .i....•:..•.•.•.•._.•...•.•X:•: j RESIDENTIAL : OPEN X-mfill ::l::: >::::::::: :::: I , , SPACE ST. _ MEDIUM ---i DENSITY :: :;: --:�--i RESIDENTIAL :::; : : :: : :: ::::::•;:•:;: — `Y' /UGG Ln M E D I U M'r_= a DENSITY u GENERAL ' RESIDENTIAALX. ::': :• �••: A0.ATF.0 _ COMMERCIAL WARNER NO LOW ct nr RA00 'OR GER 1— f DENSITYI Z N RESIDENTIAL DOMBAR M E D I:U M J �' w x ¢ PENDLE 0 1 _ �.,W, rR DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AIELuc DR, I .. w 'on, ° ' •ono :.._ GLENROY DR o 1= - I CR -"--1 ; SEAPIK CR vv� I �-7�a._ -Y� t_.•-r- ;-._..J .L._L-_-.� r._ _ - 14 J EXISTING Figure 2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AREA 2.1 huntington beach planning division —5— 7 7 i . History Prior to the first Europeans in western Orange County, the Portola expedition of 1769, Native Americans had occupied the area that contains Meadowlark Airport for over two thousand years (approximately 2555 B.C. to 145 A.D. ) . People that are now referred to as Gabrielinos and Jaunenos, by the missions that were established in what is now Los Angeles and Orange Counties, would have camped in that area . These people were semi-nomadic responding to seasonal food sources . Located on the Bolsa Chica Mesa, the airport is near the bluffs bordering the Bolsa Chica Wetland. Historically, Bolsa Chica has been subject to tidal inundation that contributed to an abundant source of shellfish. Numerous prehistoric shell middens found in the general area indicate the extent of the available food source and the level of exploitation by indigenous people. * In 1771 the Mission San Gabriel was established with jurisdictional power over all the land west of the Santa Ana River including the area containing the airport . Manuel Nieto received a grant in 1784 for 200, 000 acres of land between the San Gabriel and Santa Ana rivers, and named his Rancho La Zanja . After Mexico gained independence from Spain the Rancho was divided among Nieto ' s heirs . The airport site was part of Rancho Las Bolsas by 1834 and Rancho La Bolsa Chica by 1842 and was, by then, an 8, 000 acre parcel owned by Joaquin Ruiz . The first United States citizen to own the subject property was Abel Stearns . By 1890 Henry Winters purchased acreage which included the project site. Farming had replaced livestock as the primary use of the land, and shortly after 1900 Chinese, Italian and Japanese farm laborers were working the land. Homes were built, components of the community that was called Wintersberg . In 1918 an Orange County directory listed 132 householders in Wintersburg, 106 were employed in agriculture. Agriculture use of the site ended when it was purchased by Colonel Willsie. The Colonel , a World War II Veteran, felt there was a need for a private airport in the area . The airport commenced operation in 1946 . Originally called Sunset Beach airport, Meadowlark initially consisted of two parallel unpaved runways . By 1952 when then Major Willsie was recalled to active duty in Korea, the airport was sold to the Nerio family. Airport facilities were expanded in 1958 with some of the land still under cultivation. Today, the entire site is devoted to airport operations . *Sources : Scientific Resource Surveys and the Huntington Beach Historical Society. (0588D) -6- ` t Recent History Currently, there are 150 planes tied down at Meadowlark. * Most of the aircraft are flown on the weekend with few take-offs and landings occurring during weekdays . According to Paul Stebelton of the FAA flight standards office, ** Meadowlark has a relatively good safety record. Of the nine accidents that have occured during the seven year period, 1980 through 1986, there were no fatalities and only two people were seriously injured, see Table 1 for the list of incidents . The short runway and competition for air space with other airports in the general region present special challanges to pilots using Meadowlark. During the same period, 1980 to 1986, complaints regarding the airport operation have been relatively minor and declining . A major contributor to the decline in complaints has been establishment of the Airport Board. Created in 1978, the Airport Board comprised of City staff, airport operations staff, and pilots, meets quarterly to resolve airport related issues . *** 2 . 1 .3 Analysis The following analysis examines six alternative land uses for the subject property. (1) Existing Airport (2) Mobile Home 90 units Low Density Residential 385 units (3) Low Density Residential 245 units Medium Density Residential 300 units General Commercial 130, 680 gross square feet (4) Medium Density Residential 825 units General Commercial 130, 680 gross square feet (5) Medium Density Residential 450 units Medium High Density Residential 375 units Senior Residential 250 units General Commercial 196, 020 gross square feet (6) Low Density Residential 64 units Medium Density Residential 429 units Medium High Density Residential 375 units Senior Residential 108 units General Commercial 159 ,429 gross square feet * Art Nerio, Telephone conversation February 4 , 1987 . ** Telephone conversation, May 5, 1986 *** Richard Barnard, Assistant to the City Manager, May 16, 1986 (0588D) -7- i TABLE 1 MEADOWLARK AIRPORT ACCIDENTS 1980 through 1986 : AREA 2 . 1 Year Month Incident 1980 No Accidents 1981 May 25 Collision on runway, two planes : Cessna 172 and KR2 1982 May 12 Cessna 182 . The aircraft landed off the runway and hit two trailers parked near the runway. 1983 May 8 Hard landing, Cessna 172 . 1983 June 22 Emergency landing, engine failure; hit residential unit on Roosevelt 1984 Aug . 31 Crash landing; Beach C23 1985 Sept . 5 Cessna 150 crashed on runway 1985 Sept . 21 Cessna 172 crashed into an office building. 1985 Sept . 29 Mooney M20K crashed, hitting a quanset but at the airport . 1986 July 31 Collision, end of runway, aircraft and vehicle: 1940 ' s model Globe "Swift" aircraft and late model car parked near the end of the runway. Of the eight accidents that have occurred at Meadowlark during the six year period (1980 through 1986) there were no fatalities and only two individuals seriously injured (June, 1983 accident) . Mr. Stebelton said that Meadowlark has a relatively good safety record considering the amount of air traffic in the area and the shortened runway, also referred to as a displaced threshold. (0588D) -8- 2. 1. 3 . 1 Land Use The property located north of the subject site (across Heil Avenue) has a Low Density Residential designation, is zoned R-1 (single family residential) , and is developed with single family dwellings . Property located to the east of the subject site, starting at the intersection of Heil Avenue and Graham Street is designated as Low Density Residential and is zoned R-1 . The area contains a church, single family dwellings, and vacant lots . Eight hundred (800) feet south of Heil Avenue, east of the airport, is an undeveloped five acre city park site, which is zoned CF-R (community facility recreation) , and which contains a mature grove of Eucalyptus trees . Property south of the park site is designated as Low Density Residential, zoned R-1 and developed with single family units . The northwest corner of Warner Avenue and Graham Street is designated Medium Density Residential, is zoned R-4 (high density residential) and is developed with medium density condominiums (8 units/acre) . The property located west of the subject site, immediately south of Heil Avenue, is designated Low Density Residential in the General Plan, is zoned MH (mobile home) and contains a four acre, 65 space mobile home park. Property immediately west of the mobile home park is designated Medium Density Residential, is zoned R2 (medium density residential) and is developed with apartments . Property north of Pearce Street is designated Low Density Residential is zoned R-1 and is developed as single family dwellings . The area west of the study area immediately south of Pearce Street is designated as Medium Density Residential, is zoned R-2 and is developed with a mixture of apartment buildings and older single family houses . The area on the southeast corner of Bolsa Chica Road and Pearce Street was recently developed as Medium Density apartments . Immediately south of this property is a two acre vacant lot . Nothing is proposed at this time but the property owners are considering senior residential, condominiums, apartments or commercial development . The property immediately north of Warner Avenue, west of the site is designated General Commercial, is zoned C2 (community business district) , C4 (highway commercial) , and R-5 (office professional) , and is developed with commercial and office professional uses . The area south of the airport, across Warner Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Street is designated General Commercial, is zoned C4 , R5 and (Q) C4 , and is developed with commercial and office professional uses . The area south of Warner and west of Graham Street is designated Low Density Residential, is zoned R-1 and is developed with single family dwellings . Alternatives Six alternative land use concepts, outlined in Table 2, are being analyzed for the subject property. Appendix A outlines the assumptions that were used to develop Table 2 . Figure 3 shows the configuration of each proposed alternative. The alternatives are described as follows : (0588D) -9- TABLE 2 ALTERNATIVE LAND USE CONCEPTS: AREA 2.1 TRIP GENERATION SEWAGE GyENERATION NO. GROSS EMPLOYEE AVE. DAILY COMMERCIAL AVERAGE PEAK ALT. LAND USE ACREAGE UNITS SO, FT. POPULATION GENERATION TRIPS TRIPS GPQ S;PD Airport 65 0 0 2 13 0 0 0 0 Mobile Home 10 AC 90 0 135 Low Dens. Res. 55 AC 385 0 1.259 475 1,394 0 3,897 0 131,300 328,250 3 Low Dens. Res. 35 AC 245 0 802 Med. Dens. Res. 20 AC 300 0 600 Commercial 10 AC —0 130,680 0 545 1,401 220 10,305 6,000 180,600 451,500 4 Med. Dens. Res. 55 AC 825 0 1,650 Commercial 10 AC 0 130,680 ,0 825 1,650 220 11,775 6,000 143,400 358,500 5 Med. Dens. Res. 30 AC 450 0 900 Med. High Dens. 15 AC 375 0 656 Sr. Citz. Res. 5 AC 250 0 375 Commercial 15 AC —0 196,020 —0 1,075 1,931 330 14,250 9,000 281,250 703,125 6 Low Dens. Res. 9.2 AC 64 0 209 Med. Dens. Res. 28.6 AC 429 0 858 Med. High. Dens. 15 AC 375 0 656 Sr. Ctz. Res. 2.92 AC 108 0 162 Commercial 12.2 AC —0 159,429 ,0 976 1,885 264 13,130 7,320 273,136 682,840 (8213d) -10- FIGURE 3 ALTERNATIVE LAND USE CONCEPTS AREA 2 . 1 rw� 91 AIRPORT 65 AC 55 AC.- les-Iin t t' AL III IK C71 C--cF, > ALTERNATIVE I ALTERNATIVE 2 Iw- JI FT -10 CF-R CF-R LN 91.1SIT, 11' — - DE4SITf ---4 111411AL A[DEI UN IS AC. I SFDE:4TIAL Its 321"Ic --M'2 O0t uA m—.. 77F OE MS ES'01,EAL & .� .>> © I --- --- O — I .M — COMMERCIAL) Io Ac. T— OE -- 7 11 L ALTERNATIVE 3 ALT ERA 8TIVE 4 Figure 3 ALTERNATIVE LAND USE CONCEPTS AREA 2J huntington beach planning division FIGURE 3 ALTERNATIVE LAND USE CONCEPTS CONTINUED -C� ! �r— I I sue--• I I I � _ i �E� � . Df NS Rr I OCNT, JJI I -DEnSITr, - 15 4C, RESIDENTIAL 775 *.its 4.6 AC. — '• i� :1: I' i un1 s• 7CF'R Li '.: 1, 1 EON —� fEs�' 1 n7 EDIUn CF-R 1�� I----- �DENSIT• DC NSI Tr i U1 • RESIDE nT IAI L20NC ;RE S!DENT IAI 1 - _� - -•-qr,' 1 OE NSIi7 1 i - 4•6 Al. '�• t 70 AC. 1 BUf fER s50—1t, 1 ZONE— SEn;OR 1 RL 6-iOe '02 units •` `ti C1712fn 1 2E.fi AE, I CST 1'E:+`- __Jr�1 _ aESEDE nT:AI �_—� A29 u 1ts .A' r2SIDENT•Ai ��v�� I l08•units S0 untts- 1 NCDIUN +: 1�`J IOEn _37551DENT I15 Ai 77 ,1_ 5 units 1 � �————-- �� (ONN[PC 11L _ (Or.MER( 15 AC. I I ---6 un+t(� / +• ?y`�'S�!S' --�CC'T'I-' �r-'L_. _�d leC�_:�`—� J --I-T-- _��, �:�_Jy��:'_`= C�•_�-r'=cam. ALTERNATIVE 5 ALTERNATIVE E ALTERNATIVE LAND USE Figure 3 (cont. ) CONCEPTS ALMKX CONTINUED huntington beach planning division -12- Alternative 1 : Existing Airport The existing low density residential designation on the site is implemented by MH, Mobile Home zoning, which was applied to the area in September, 1980, at the request of the applicant, Dick Nerio . The applicant ' s intent at the time of the zone change was to submit a plan for a 450 space mobile home park. However, the applicant has indicated that he has no intention at this time of utilizing the mobile home zoning. Therefore, Alternative 1 will be analyzed as the existing airport . Alternative 2 : Mobile Home and Low Density Residential This alternative would designate 10 acres as Mobile Home, resulting in 90 units, and 55 acres of Low Density Residential, resulting in 385 units . The estimated population would be 1, 394 persons . Alternative 3 : Low and Medium Residential and Commercial This alternative includes 35 acres of Low Density Residential, 20 acres of Medium Density Residential and 10 acres of General Commercial . The low density portion would result in 245 units and would generate a population of 801 persons . The medium density portion would result in 300 units and would generate a population of 600 persons . The total population would be 1,401 persons . The 10 acre community shopping center would front on Warner Avenue and would typically contain a supermarket, shopping center, drug store, major restaurant, and possibly a savings and loan. Total square footage would be 130, 680 gross square feet and the center would generate approximately 220 employees . Alternative 4 : Medium Density Residential and Commercial This alternative is comprised of 55 acres of Medium Density Residential that would generate a population of 1, 650 persons . The 10 acres of commercial would result in 130, 680 gross square feet and would generate approximately 220 employees . Alternative 5 : Applicants Request - Medium, Medium High and Senior Residential and Commercial The applicant is requesting a Planned Community designation, including 30 acres of Medium Density Residential 15 acres of Medium High Density Residential, five acres of Senior Residential, and 15 acres of General Commercial . The 30 acres of Medium Density would result in 450 units and would generate 900 persons . The Medium High Density would result in 375 units and would generate 656 persons . The Senior portion would result in 250 units and would generate 375 persons . The 15 acres of General Commercial would result in 296, 020 gross square feet and would generate 330 employees . (0588D) -13- The applicant has requested the land use designation of "Planned ` Community (PC) " . The Planned Community (PC) designation is a method used to create a specific type of environment and development characteristics through implementation of a plan for a minimum area of 50 acres . The intention of a PC is to provide a comprehensive, coordinated development plan for an identifiable area of land in order to take advantage of the benefits of large scale community planning. Existing City zoning and subdivision codes are applicable to a PC. Specifically, through the process of subdivision, site plan and circulation plan reviews, integrated developments will be established which are in conformance with the policies of the General Plan. Alternative 6 : Staff Recommentation - Low, Medium, Medium High and Senior Residential and Commercial The staff alternative to the applicant ' s request includes 9 . 2 acres of Low Density Residential, 28 . 6 acres of Medium Density Residential, 15 acres of Medium High Density Residential, 2 . 9 acres of Senior Residential and 12 .2 acres of General Commercial . The Low Density portion would result in 64 units and would generate 209 persons . The Medium Density portion would result in 429 units and would generate 858 persons . The Medium High Density portion would result in 375 units and would generate 656 persons . The Senior portion is located outside of the study area on property which is located on the west side of the airport and is owned by the applicant . It is designated Medium Density Residential, is zoned R-2 and is currently vacant . It would result in 108 units and generate 162 persons . The 12 .2 acres of General Commercial would result in 159 ,429 gross square feet and would generate 264 employees . COMPATIBILITY Alternative 1 : Existing Airport Serious questions have been raised regarding safety issues and the compatibility of Meadowlark Airport adjacent to primarily residential and commercial developments . The airport operates without a radio tower. Nine accidents, no fatalities, resulted over the past 7 years involving collisions, including one between a small airplane and a residential unit and one with an office building. Although few complaints have been registered with the city, the potential threat to the health and safety of surrounding residents can not be ignored. All airports in Southern California are seeing an increase in usage. Additional flights into and out of the airport without safety precautions, such as radio communications, could substantially increase this threat . Alternative 2 : Mobile Home and Low Density Residential This alternative would likely result in a 10 acre mobile home park fronting Heil Avenue which will be sandwiched between an existing mobile home park and a church. Fifty-five acres of Low Density Residential will be designated on the remainder of the property. No compatibility problems would be expected to occur . (0588D) -14- Alternative 3 : Low and Medium Residential and Commercial This alternative would likely result in a 10 acre commercial center fronting Warner, 20 acres of Medium Density north of the commercial center and 35 acres of Low Density on the remainder of the site. Commercial would likely be a community shopping center, containing small shops and offices anchored by a supermarket and/or drug store, a major restaurant, and possibly a bank or savings and loan. It would be located between commercial) and low density condominiums where buffering techniques would be required. The medium and low density uses would be compatible with the surrounding uses . Alternative 4 : Medium Density Residential and Commercial This alternative proposes a 10 acre commercial center along Warner and medium density residential on the remainder of the site. This alternative would be compatible in general . Buffering techniques would again be required between the commercial center and the low density condominiums . Alternative 5 : Medium, Medium High and Senior Residential and Commercial The applicant ' s request proposes a 15 acre commercial center fronting Warner Avenue, Senior Residential immediately northwest, Medium High Density Residential immediately northwest, Medium High Density residential immediately northeast corner of the commercial center, and Medium Density residential fronting Heil Avenue. The commercial center is compatible with adjacent uses, except some buffering may be required with the low density condominiums to the east . The Medium, Medium High and Senior Residential uses are generally compatible, however, special attention to buffering techniques such as greenbelts will be required to prevent compatibility problems with the single family dwellings . Alternative 6 Low, Medium, Medium High and Senior Residential and Commercial The staff alternative proposes 12 .2 acres of commercial along Warner, 28 . 6 acres of Medium Density immediately north of the commercial center, 15 acres of Medium High Density fronting Heil, and 9 . 2 acres of Low Density adjacent to the surrounding low density uses . 2 . 9 acres of Senior Residential would be moved outside of the study area to an area west of and adjacent to the Medium Density and Commercial . This alternative to the applicant ' s request provides greater compatibility between Medium and Medium High Density and existing single family dwellings . The 9 .2 acres of Low Density will provide a buffer for adjacent low density residential uses . The Medium High Density along Heil should be set back sufficiently to buffer Low Density Residential uses across the street . The senior residential will be compatible in the new location with adjacent Medium and Medium High Density uses . (0588D) -15- , 2 . 1 .3 . 2 Housing In 1984 , the City adopted a state-mandated revision to the Housing Element of the General Plan which includes policy aimed at increasing housing opportunities for households with low and moderate incomes . Another policy requires the provision of adequate housing for the elderly and disabled. The revised element also includes a policy to provide affordable units by granting density bonuses . Currently, there is a strong market for single family homes and moderately priced condominiums . The five alternatives would have the following impact on the housing market in Huntington Beach: Alternative 1 If the existing airport remains, no additional units will be provided. Alternative 2 Ninety mobile home units will be provided on 10 acres . Mobile homes are generally not affordable to low income residents, however the units are considered affordable for residents with moderate incomes . Some elderly housing would be provided. 385 single family homes will be provided on 55 acres of low density. Alternative 3 245 single family homes on 35 acres of Low Density and 300 condominium or rental units will be provided on 20 acres of Medium Density. Alternative 4 825 condominium or rental units will be provided on 55 acres of Medium Density. Alternative 5 The Nerio family is proposing to provide 450 condominium or rental units on 30 acres of Medium Density and 375 units on 15 acres of High Density. Approximately 250 senior units will be provided on 3-5 acres . Alternative 6 Sixty-four single family dwellings or low density condominiums will be provided on 9 .2 acres . 429 condominiums or rental units will be provided on 28 . 6 acres of Medium Density. 375 condominium or rental units will be provided on 15 acres of Medium High Density and 108 senior residential units will be provided on 2 . 9 acres of Senior Residential . (0588D) -16- 21. 1. 3 . 3 Economic Considerations The Planning staff utilized its standard fiscal impact methodology to analyze the alternatives in this amendment . The revenues and expenditures associated with each alternative were predicted for one year for comparison purposes . The results are summarized in the table below. Appendix B contains a summary of the fiscal impact assumptions . Alt . 1 Alt . 2 Alt . 3 Alt . 4 Revenue $3 , 554 $277, 007 $515, 870 $614 , 235 Cost $5, 551 $125, 921 $146, 769 $179 , 592 Revenue-Cost ($2, 017) $151, 086 $369, 101 $434 , 643 Revenue/Cost 0 . 64 2.20 3 . 51 3 .42 Alt , 5 Alt . 6 Revenue $734, 173 $671, 852 Cost $198, 750 $195, 070 Revenue-Cost $535,423 $476, 782 Revenue/Cost 3 . 69 3 .44 As shown above, Alternative 5 (applicants proposed project) generates the most revenue and the largest estimated net revenue. The difference is due to the fact that Alternative 5 has the highest density of dwelling units and also the largest commercial development . Appendix C contains a market report which was conducted by Laventhol and Horwath for the Nerio family. It concludes that the study area will support a commercial/retail center . 2 . 1 .3 .4 Public Services and Utilities A. Sewers The table below shows the expected peak sewage generated by each of the five alternatives . The Orange County Sanitation District is currently utilizing the unit flow values set for in a November 1986, report entitled "Amendment No 1 to the Consolidated Master Plan of Trunk Sewers for County Sanitation Districts 2, 3 , and ll . " Sewer Generation Alternative Average/gpd* Peak/qpd* 1 0 0 2 131, 300 328, 250 3 180, 600 451, 500 4 143 ,400 358, 500 5 281, 250 703 , 125 6 273, 136 682, 840 * gallons per day I (0588D) -17- The study area is presently served by septic tanks on the site. New' development would be served by the city sewer system and County Sanitation District 11. A 15 inch line exists in Heil Avenue and a variable 18, 12, and 21 inch line exists in Warner Avenue. All of the sewage can be accommodated by both lines . For Alternatives 5 and 6, staff recommends that sewage from the medium and medium high density residential utilize the Heil line and sewage from the commercial and senior residential areas flow into the Warner line. The city system connects to the collection system of County Sanitation District No . 11 at several points downstream of the site. All of the sewage from this area of Huntington Beach flows into the District ' s Slater Avenue Pump station, which is located between Goldenwest Street and Gothard Street . This station is near capacity and cannot prudently accept any of the flow from the proposed development, or from further development within the boundary of the district . However, Sanitation District officials have stated that the peak 328, 250 gallons per day of sewage generated by the existing low density zoning (5050 gallons per day/acre) may be accepted, although it may aggravate the capacity problems . All possible improvements to the existing station have been constructed. New pumps with increased capacity have already been installed. A further increase in capacity would require major structural work or complete structure replacement . Three interim solutions to the problem have been proposed. First, the Orange County Sanitation District is considering the possibility of imposing a moratorium on all new construction in the area served by the Slater pump station. The area includes portions of District 3 . This issue will probably be discussed at the Board of Directors meeting on April 15, 1987 . The moratorium would be lifted when the capacity problems are solved. Projects approved prior to any moratorium would most likely be exempted. Second, it may be possible to construct an additional pump station which could handle up to 5 million gallons per day of sewage. According to Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering for the Sanitation District, this proposal could easily cost $500, 000 and would be abandoned, along with the Slater pump station, when the Coast Trunk line is in place. RMG Engineering is studying the feasibility of this proposal and should be presenting their recommendation in April 1987. Finally, RMG Engineers also completed a sewage study for the applicant which proposed the use of on-site holding tanks . The sewage would be stored during peak hours and pumped through the station during low usage hours . The District will not comment on the use of such tanks, nor will they own or operate them. (0588D) -18- The ultimate answer to the sewage dilemma in District 11 is to complete the master plan of facilities which includes the construction of a pump station at the bluff near Pacific Coast f Highway, the Coast Trunk Sewer Line from the pump station across the Bolsa Chica to the Edwards Street extension and a line up Edwards Street to Slater Avenue. These improvements would provide adequate capacity for all District 11, as well as development in the Bolsa Chica . There are two major considerations at this time. The improvements would cost approximately $12-15 million and the District does not have funds at this time. Discussions are underway between the Orange County Sanitation District, developers and involved agencies to find a way to finance the new line and expedite its construction. Second, the routing of a major portion of the pipeline will be through the environmentally sensitive Bolsa Chica wetlands . Immediate resolution of these problems could expedite the project, however cooperation between all involved parties is essential . According to Tom Dawes, the Coast Trunk Line would hopefully be completed within five years . Staff recommends that the applicant phase his development to coincide with the completion of the Coast Trunk line. The Slater pump station cannot prudently accept any additional sewage at this time, although the amount of sewage which would be generated by the existing low density zoning will be accepted. B. Water The area of concern is currently served by a 12-inch water main in Heil Avenue, an eight inch main in Pearce Street and a 16-inch main in Warner Avenue. Development under any of the five land use alternatives will require that a 12-inch water main be installed bisecting the site from north to south. Eight-inch mains branching off of the 12-inch pipe will be required on internal street to serve individual units . C. Storm Drains Existing storm drains in the vicinity of the study area terminate at the intersections of Heil Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street and at Warner Avenue and Graham Street . Any of the six land use alternatives will require that a storm drain of approximately 42 inches in diameter be installed in Heil Avenue from the site west to Bolsa Chica Street . If development on part of the site is designed to drain towards Warner Avenue, a small storm drain may be required in that arterial to prevent street flooding. (0588D) -19- t D. Police ' Police service for the area of concern is provided by the City of Huntington Beach, which operates from one central facility located at Main Street and Yorktown Avenue. To determine future manpower needs for new developments, the Police Department recommends the addition of one officer for every 535 calls generated. Appendix B discusses the method used to determine the number of calls . Each alternative for this area of concern would require the following additional officers : Estimated Additional Land Use Alternative Calls/Year Officers 1. Existing airport 55 . 10 2 . Mobile Home/Low Density 245 .46 3 . Low Density/Medium Density/Commercial 433 . 81 4 . Medium Density/Commercial 658 1.23 5 . Medium Density/Medium High Density/Senior 721 1.35 Citizen/Commercial 6 . Low Density/Medium Density/Medium High 708 1.32 Density/Senior Citizen Commercial E. Fire The Meadowlark development area would be served by engine companies from Heil and Warner fire stations. Either of these engines could provide service within five (5) minutes, 80 percent of the time to any of the proposed developments . Paramedic service would be provided from Warner Fire Station. The first truck company would respond from Murdy Fire Station. The response time for the truck would be approximately ten (10) minutes, 90 percent of the time. Generally, response times are quicker into low density projects than into high density projects . Senior Citizen housing projects impact the Fire Department ' s medical and response capabilities because, according to Fire Department statistics, people over 62 years of age generally require more medical services . Response times generally increase as densities increase because of reduced or obstructed fire access . Therefore, fire protection systems or devices will be required in most of the property options. The alternatives and the impact that each would have on the fire department are listed below. None of the alternatives would result in the need for additional manpower or equipment. (0588D) -20- Land Use Alternative No . of Calls 1 . Existing airport Pending 2 . Mobile Home/Low Denstiy 31. 29 3 . Low Density/Medium Density/ Commercial 36 .89 4 . Medium Density/Commercial 57 . 75 5 . Medium Density/Medium High Density Commercial 75 .25 6 . Low Density/Medium Density/ Medium High Density/Senior Citizen Commercial 70 . 25 F. Parks A five acre park site (Gibbs Park) is located adjacent to the area of concern. Gibbs Park is dominated by Sims Grove, a thick stand of eucalyptus trees . The trees provide a breeding and resting ground for migrating Monarch butterflies . The park is also utilized by local youth groups as a campground. Improvements to the park are scheduled for FY 1990-91 and may include picnic tables, open recreational areas and possibly a campground. The trees will be preserved in their natural state. Chris Carr neighborhood park is located two thirds of a mile to the east and Wieder Park is located three quarters of a mile to the west of the study area. Marina Community Park is located three quarters of a mile to the north. Community Services staff have indicated that Gibbs and Wieder Parks will more than serve the needs of the study area . According to a 1979 census date total population of the quarter section which contains the study area was 1, 261 persons . The Recreation Element of the General Plan, adopted in 1984 , suggests that 0 . 92 acres of neighborhood or mini parks should be provided per 1, 000 persons . Therefore, approximately 1 . 2 acres of neighborhood park is currently needed in the quarter section. Alternatives 1-6 will require zero, 1 .28, 1 . 29 , 1 . 52, 1 . 70, and 1 . 73 acres of additional neighborhood parkland respectively. When developed, Gibbs park, at five acres, will provide sufficient parkland for all alternatives . G. Schools The area of concern is served by Meadow View, Haven View, and Village View Elementary Schools and Marina High School . Students generated by the alternative land uses being considered are as shown in Table 3 below. The Oceanview Elementary School District and the Huntington Beach Union High School District indicate that existing schools could adequately accommodate the students generated by any of the five alternative land use designations . (0588D) -21- Table 3 ' Student Generation Alternative Elementary School High School 1 0 0 2 81 100 3 88 76 4 99 33 5 99 33 6 111 49 H. Gas and Electrical Utilities Natural gas service and electrical service are provided by the Southern California Gas Company and the Edison Company, respectively. Two 2-inch gas feeder lines extended into the site from a 12-inch main gas supply line located in Warner Avenue. There is also a 3-inch gas line in Heil Avenue. Extension of these lines will provide adequate gas service to development under any of the alternatives . The Gas Company notes, however, that gas supply may be affected by the overall availability of natural gas and by State and Federal regulatory policies . Adequate electric power supply can be provided from 12 KV distribution lines in the vicinity of the area of concern. Edison states that unless electrical generating capacity exceed their estimates, and provided that there are no unexpected outages to major sources of electrical supply, they expect to meet peak demand during the 1980 ' s . I . Solid Waste Disposal The Rainbow Disposal Company provides solid waste collection to the City of Huntington Beach. No local service constraints are expected under any of the land use alternatives . J. Senior Services With the inclusion of a senior citizen housing complex in Alternatives 5 and 6 , the issue of proximity of services and special requirements for seniors becomes an important component of this EIR. The City' s code address four major service categories of importance to seniors : (0588D) -22- 1. Public Transportation The Orange County Transportation District (OCTD) has numerous bus routes that serve Orange County with connections to Los Angeles County' s Rapid Transit District . The route that would be the most accessible to the proposed project would be Route 72, providing service along Warner Avenue from Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) east to Santa Ana. This route provides direct connections to Route 1 on PCH and eleven other routes along Warner, plus the OCTD terminal in Santa Ana . OCTD also has Dial-A-Ride service with reduced fares for seniors . The Dial-A-Ride is a curb to curb mini-bus service within a designated neighborhood zone. There are reduced bus fares for seniors on local routes during peak commuting times and the rest of the day and evening seniors can ride the bus free. 2 . Shopping Areas The City of Huntington Beach offers a variety of shopping opportunities ranging from small neighborhood centers to a regional mall . At the southeast corner of Heil Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street, approximately 1, 500 feet from the proposed location of the senior complex, there is a community shopping center containing a Lucky Super Market and an array of small stores . Within the proposed project there is a plan to develop the portion along Warner Avenue with commercial businesses, including a super market . Two miles east of the project site there is another community center with an Alpha Beta Market at the northwest corner of Goldenwest and Warner . There are also numerous neighborhood centers in the general vicinity of the project site. Also, within four miles of the site, is Huntington Center, a regional mall . Across from the mall there are a variety of retail outlets including a hardware store, furniture store, and restaurants . This regional center is accessible, from the project site, by bus with a transfer at Warner and Beach. 3 . Medical Facilities The most immediate medical service available to a senior community is paramedic service. Combined with local fire stations, paramedic units are attached to the stations on Heil between Springdale and Graham (within a mile of the project site) and on Warner just east of Pacific Coast Highway (less than two miles from the project site) . An emergency medical care facility is located on Edinger between Goldenwest and Edwards, within three miles of the project site. Full service medical facilities can be found at the two hospitals in Huntington Beach. Humana Hospital is located on Beach Boulevard between Slater and Talbert, approximately three and three-quarter miles from the project site. Pacifica Hospital is located at Delaware and Main, four and one-quarter miles from the project site. (0588D) -23- 4 . Other Services In addition to necessary services there are religious and recreational services that are important to note. Several churches are within a short walk of the project site: Mormon, Catholic, and Lutheran. The Meadowlark Golf Course is to the east and just across the street from the site. There is a library located on Graham just north of Edinger, less than two miles from the site. Central Park, with its large library and miles of walking paths is three miles from the project site and also accessible by bus . Also, there are movie theaters at Charter Centre located at the corner of Warner and Beach. 2 . 1. 3 . 5 Traffic and Circulation Access to the study area is presently taken from Warner Avenue, a major arterial . The northern portion of the study area fronts on Heil Avenue which is a secondary arterial . Pearce Street, a residential street, deadends at the western boundary of the site. Traffic from Pearce Street flows into Bolsa Chica, which is designated as a major arterial although it is presently operating as a primary arterial because it has not been fully widened to six lanes. Roosevelt is an unimproved private easement, except for a short paved spur which is public, which accesses the study area from Warner Avenue. Local residents utilize the dirt road to access their homes and Pearce Street . The Orange County Transit District (OCTD) currently provides service to the study area. Routes 70 and 72 serve the project site, with bus stops currently located at Warner Avenue/Graham Street, Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street, Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue, and Heil Avenue/Waterway Circle. Traffic flow along arterials and through intersections can be evaluated in terms of volume/capacity ratios and related level of service ratings . The concept of "level of service (LOS) " is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists . (Appendix D) A "level of service" definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined. They are given letter designations from A to F, with LOS 'A' representing the best operating conditions and LOS 'F' representing the worst conditions . The County of Orange Environmental Management Agency Transportation Planning Division recommends LOS 'C' as a desirable arterial capacity, since standard roadways operating at that level of service in the Orange County region can be expected to have intersections operating at LOS D, which approaches design capacity. Appendix C describes the levels of service and corresponding maximum average daily trips (ADT) . (0588D) -24- Table 4 lists the existing levels of service for arterials in the study area . According to a study performed by Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade, and Douglas in August of 1986 for the Nerio family, all arterials are currently operating at acceptable levels of service on a daily basis with the exception of Warner Avenue which is nearing capacity. Afternoon peak hour turning counts were performed at key intersections . The Bolsa Chica Road/Warner Avenue intersection is operating at LOS 'D' and is nearing capacity during the afternoon peak hour. At LOS 'D' , a high density, but stable flow can be expected. Bolsa Chica Road/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street are operating at LOS 'B' and 'A' respectively, which are good levels of service. Pearce Drive and Bolsa Chica Street are operating at LOS 'A' on an average daily basis, therefore their intersection is anticipated to be operating at an acceptable level of service ( 'C' or better) in peak condition. Heil Avenue and Graham Street are operating at LOS ' B' and 'C' respectively on a daily basis . This intersection accommodates volumes below its capacity and is operating at LOS 'C' during the afternoon peak. The City is currently planning arterial street improvements for Warner Avenue. These improvements include the completed widening to six lanes and a left turn lane on Warner at Bolsa Chica Street and signal modifications at the intersections of Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue/Graham Avenue. These improvements are slated for fiscal year 1988-89 . Bolsa Chica Street is currently being fully widened between Warner and Heil . The southwest corner of Heil and Graham is unimproved and there are no plans for improvements at this time. An analysis of two proposed developments which are adjacent to the study area and their suggested circulation systems is included in Appendix E. Appendix F illustrates the number of average daily trips that will be generated by the six land use alternatives . Alternative 1 will generate no additional traffic, Alternative 2 will generate 3, 897 ADT, Alternative 3 will generate 10, 305 ADT, Alternative 4 will generate 11, 775 ADT, Alternative 5 will generate 14, 250 ADT and Alternative 6 will generate 13, 130 ADT. The following near term and long term analysis by Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas examines the impact of the applicant ' s proposal on the surrounding arterials and intersections by comparing Alternative 1, retention of the existing use and Alternative 5, the applicant ' s proposal . Alternative 5 would represent the highest intensity proposed use of the study area. Construction of the applicants proposed project would likely be phased with the completion of the commercial area scheduled for approximately five years (1991) and completion of the residential areas estimated within ten years (1996) . The study analyzed the near term (1991) and long term (1996) levels of service of five intersections, including Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue, Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive, Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue, Heil Avenue/Graham and Warner Avenue/Graham Street, which can be expected both with and without the proposed land uses . (0588D) -25- TABLE 4 EXISTING ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE* FOR STUDY AREA ROADWAY LIMITS ADT LOS** Heil Avenue Algonquin to Bolsa Chica 8, 200 A Heil Avenue Bolsa Chica to Graham 17, 500 B Heil Avenue Graham to Springdale 15, 000 A Pearce Drive Bolsa Chica east to Terminus 1,400 A*** Warner Avenue Algonquin to Bolsa Chica 32, 000 D Warner Avenue Bolsa Chica to Graham 30, 000 C Warner Avenue Graham to Springdale 30, 000 C Bolsa Chica Road Edinger to Heil 28, 800 A Bolsa Chica Road Heil to Warner 26, 800 A Graham Street Edinger to Heil 8, 500 C Graham Street Heil to Warner 8, 000 C * Source: Parsons , Brinckerhoff, Quade and Douglas Inc. ** Assumes primary arterial status *** Based on 2, 500 maximum ADT for residential streets per City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department . (0588D) -26- Traffic volumes were estimated by increasing existing arterial ADT by a 3 . 5 percent annual growth factor, after subtracting current traffic attributable to airport operations . The growth factor reflects average annual growth rates of three to four percent over the past six years as estimated by the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works . Since the area has undergone considerable growth in the recent past and projects in the Bolsa Chica are planned for the future, this figure is probably reasonable. Specific traffic impacts from Bolsa Chica development are not included in the analysis . Near Term Traffic Impacts Table 5 shows the near term afternoon peak arterial levels of service both with and without the project . Near term traffic attributable to the project would be entirely commercial trips accessing the project from Warner Avenue. The arterial levels of service will not change except for Warner Avenue between Bolsa Chica and Springdale, where the level of service will decrease from LOS 'A' to LOS 'B' . Table 6 shows the near term afternoon peak hour intersection levels of service with and without the project . Traffic volumes without the project on Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue and Warner Avenue/Graham Street are anticipated to be operating at acceptable levels of service ( 'C' or better) , assuming City improvements are in place. The Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS 'D' condition although some improvement in capacity is gained with the additional through lanes on Warner Avenue. Traffic signal warrants were prepared for Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Avenue and Heil Avenue/Graham Street . The analysis indicates that peak hour conditions in the near term will warrant traffic signals at both intersections . If two-phased signals are in place, the level of service of both intersections i will be LOS 'A' . The addition of project traffic is expected to lower the level of service at Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue from 'D' to 'E' . Providing a separate westbound right turn lane is anticipated to increase the level of service conditions to LOS 'D' . The remaining intersections are expected to continue operating at acceptable levels of service ( 'C' or better) . According to the study with the exception of the Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street intersection, the addition of peak hour project traffic does not significantly change the levels of service discussed above for the near term scenario without the project . Staff has stated that the Warner widening project should be completed by 1991 . The addition of a separate westbound turn lane at Bolsa Chica Street/Warner and two-phased signals at Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Avenue and Heil Avenue/Graham Street are not currently planned by the City, but may be necessary at a unknown future date. A signal will definitely be needed at the Warner access to the project to serve the commercial center. (0588D) -27- i TABLE 5 FUTURE ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR STUDY AREA NEAR TERM LONG TERM ROADWAY LIMITS W/O/PROJECT W/PROJECT W/O/PROJECT W/PROJECT Heil Avenue Algonquin to Bolsa Chica A A A A Heil Avenue Bolsa Chica to Graham D D F F Heil Avenue Graham to Springdale B B D D Pearce Drive* Bolsa Chica east to Terminus A A A C Warner Avenue** Algonquin to Bolsa Chica B B C D Warner Avenue** Bolsa Chica to Graham A B C D Warner Avenue** Graham to Springdale A B C D Bolsa Chica Road Edinger to Heil A A B C Bolsa Chica Road Heil to Warner A A B C Graham Street Edinger to Heil D D D D Graham Street Heil to Warner C C D D * Based on 2,500 maximum ADT for residential streets per City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department. **Assumes currently planned City improvements (0588D) TABLE 6 NEAR TERM AFTERNOON PEAR INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE* WITHOUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT WITHOUT MIGIGATION WITH MITIGATION INTERSECTION V/C LQ5 V/C Los V/C LQS Bolsa Chica Street Warner Avenue .86 D .92 E .84 D*** Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive .33 A** .35 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue .74 C .76 C Heil Avenue/Graham Street .37 A** .38 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .67 B .71 C * Assumes arterial improvements currently planned by the City of three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. ** Assumes that a two phased signal is in place. *** Assumes a separate westbound right turn lane at Warner/Bolsa Chica. (0588D) -23- Long Term Traffic Impacts Long term traffic attributable to the project would include both commercial and residential trips totaling 14, 300 ADT. Commercial trips would continue to access the project from Warner Avenue. The study recommends additional access points at Heil Avenue/Del Mar Lane and Pearce Street . Internal site circulation would connect all three access locations, however, the connection between Warner Avenue and Pearce Drive is proposed to be somewhat indirect , incorporating turns and jogs along this route. This approach is expected to deter traffic from using the roadway as a shortcut and, according to the study, would possibly reduce traffic volumes on Pearce attributable to current residential uses . Table 7 on page 32 shows long term peak arterial levels of service both with and without the project and assumes that all recommended mitigation measures have occurred. Pearce Drive will decrease from LOS 'A' to 'C' Warner Avenue will decrease from LOS 'C' to 'D' Bolsa Chica will decrease from LOS 'B ' to 'C' . Heil and Graham will remain the same levels of service. Table 7 presents the long term peak afternoon hour volumes and intersection levels of service both without the project and with the project, and assumes intersection improvements as proposed by the City as well as the mitigation for the project traffic proposed for near term conditions . Without the project, the intersection of Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue will be operating at LOS 'E' . The addition of a separate northbound right turn land and a second eastbound left turn lane will improve the intersection to LOS 'D' . Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue is expected to operate at LOS 'F' . The addition of a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through/right lane replacing the right turn only lane and altered signal phasing will raise the level of service to LOS 'D' . Bolsa Chica Street/ Pearce Drive and Heil Avenue/Graham Street will both operate at LOS 'A' . Warner Avenue/Graham Street is expected to operated at LOS 'D' . Inclusion of project traffic is expected to decrease the level of service at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersections to LOS 'F' which exceeds capacity. The Warner Avenue/Graham Street intersection is anticipated to decrease to LOS 'D' which represents high density, but stable traffic flows . The other two key study area intersections are anticipated to be operating at LOS 'A' . According to the study, improving the two intersections expected to be operating at LOS 'F' to LOS 'D' conditions would require the same mitigation measures as would be required without the project . For the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection, these measures include adding a separate northbound right turn lane and a second eastbound left turn lane. At the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection, the proposed mitigations include a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through/right lane in place of the separate right turn lane and signal phasing which allows for protected left turns for all directions, or alternate method which will achieve the same result . (0588D) -30- TABLE 7 LONG TERM AFTERNOON PEAR HOUR INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE' WITHOUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT WITHOUT MITIGATION WITH MITIGATION WITHOUT MITIGATION WITH MITIGATION INTERSECTION VC LOS V/C IM V/C LLOS V/C LOS Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue .95 E .82 D'= 1.01 F .88 D=' Bolsa Chica. Street/Pearce Drive .39 A .42 A Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue 1.12 F .81 D=:= 1.21 F .86 D'== Heil Avenue/Graham Street .42 A .43 A Warner Avenue/Graham Street .81 D .88 D * Assumes arterial improvements proposed by the City and proposed near term mitigations. *• Assumes a separate northbound. right turn lane and second eastbound left turn lane•. •_= Assumes a separate southbound right turn lane, a combination westbound through/right lane replaces the right turn only lane, and altered signal phasing. (0588D) -31- i Mitigation Measures j The study recommends the near term and long term arterial and intersection mitigations described below to improve the level of service of the intersection to LOS 'D' and above. The City already plans to widen Warner Avenue to six lanes . The study states that all the measures, except a separate westbound right turn lane at Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue and signals at project access points, would be required with or without the project . Near Term 1. Provide three eastbound and westbound through lanes on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street (as the City currently plans) . 2 . Add a separate westbound right turn lane on Warner Avenue at Bolsa Chica Street . 3 . Install traffic signals at the following intersections : Bolsa Chica Street/Pearce Drive, Heil Avenue/Graham Street and Warner Avenue/Project Access . Long Term 1. Add a separate northbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection. 2 . Provide a second eastbound left turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Warner Avenue intersection. 3 . Add a separate southbound right turn lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection. 4 . Replace the westbound right turn only lane with a combination through/right lane at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection. 5 . Alter the signal phasing at the Bolsa Chica Street/Heil Avenue intersection protecting all left turns . Public Works may choose other methods to achieve the same goals . Staff Recommendations Staff agrees with the recommended access scenario which provides access at Warner Avenue/Leslie Lane, Heil Avenue/Del Mar Lane and Pearce Street . Roosevelt can be utilized to serve as secondary access in Alternatives 5 and 6 for the Senior Residential and in Alternative 6 to service the Low Density Residential on the west side (See Figure 4) . Project streets which connect to Pearce Drive should be indirect to discourage the use of Pearce as a shortcut . (0588D) -32- • • r\ Xs IN i4;\i2�i:\<`'.i+c,,$Y i.\\��,''� '�'.i'�\`\\a`W_fit;£." •.aai+{7r�C;\,K°''.��':•'•: :cm��a•r,Ya`Y:•�\';<•,..:`•.:. �.��, .....;Y.ft�%c%r:.;•.. 1 tit-%'-\:XX .,;.{': \� ----------------- i��i�iii► wwwwwwwwwwwiiiiiii ■ww■w■w■■ww■■■www� ■wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww■ ■wwwwwwwwwwwwwuw• ■wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww■ ■wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww� wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww� wwwww� • r The recommended mitigation measures, except for signals at project access points and the right turn lane at Warner Avenue/Bolsa Chica Street, would probably be implemented by the City eventually. However, the improvements may be needed sooner than expected with the addition of project traffic. Staff cannot project future conditions at this time. Therefore, discussions ccncerning the allocation of responsibility for the improvements may be more appropriate at a later date. 2 . 1 . 3 . 6 Environmental Issues a . Noise Noise levels of Ldn 70 and Ldn 65 extend into the southern portion of the site from Warner Avenue and into the northern portion of the site from Heil Avenue. Residential developments adjacent to these arterials will be subjected to noise levels in excess of the normally acceptable levels for residential areas . Typical exterior treatments such as walls and berms may not be adequate to reduce to Ldn 70 level to the City standard of Ldn 60 for exterior and Ldn 45 for interior noise levels . In this case, special mitigation measures such as larger setbacks, more insulation and prohibition of windows facing the street, would be required to reduce the noise to acceptable levels . The noise levels fall within the normally acceptable range (Ldn 75-Ldn 80) for commercial and office professional uses which are proposed for the acreage fronting Warner Avenue in three of the land use alternatives . The interior of the site is exposed to exterior noise levels of Ldn 60 or less . This should pose no constraint to residential development under any of the land use alternatives . Ultimate development of the study area under any of the land use alternatives will require that use of the existing Meadowlark Airport be discontinued. This will have a beneficial environmental impact on the surrounding land uses by eliminating noise from aircraft operations especially on the weekends . B. Air Ouality The study area is located in the South Coast Air Basin which currently exceeds the state and/or national ambient air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (CO) , lead, total suspended particulates, particulate matter (PM, O) , and nitrogen dioxide. Development of the area under any of the alternative land use designations would adversely affect air quality in the Basin, primarily due to increased automobile traffic generated by the additional housing units or commercial units . Projected daily emissions are indicated in Appendix G. The destination of most residential trips would be employment centers in Los Angeles and Orange County. Commercial trips would largely consist of local trips from residential areas within five miles . Transportation control measures (TCMs) are an important component of the Air Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Basin. The following mitigation measures should be considered for development of the site. (0588D) -34- 1 . Ridesharing The Orange County Transit District has a rideshare program, called "Commuter Network" , which matches origins and destinations of commuters by computer . OCTD staff is available to work with the developer to design a program specifically for the study area . 2 . Traffic Flow Improvements Traffic improvements on Warner Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street are described in Section 2 . 1. 3 . 5 . The improvements are designed to increase the level of service to LOS 'D' and above. On-street parking will eventually be eliminated from Warner Avenue, Heil Avenue, Bolsa Chica Street, and Graham Street . 3 . Transit The Orange County Transit District currently offers transit service on Warner Avenue adjacent to the project site, and on Bolsa Chica Street and Heil Avenue approximately one-quarter mile from the project site. Existing bus stops adjacent to the area are as follows : WB Warner Avenue/FS Graham Street WB Warner Avenue/FS Bolsa Chica Street EB Heil Avenue/OPP Waterway Circle NB Bolsa Chica Street/FS Heil Avenue WB, EB, NB: Direction of travel on arterial - westbound, eastbound and northbound. FS, OPP: Location of bus stop relative to intersection between arterial and cross street - farside of intersection, or opposite "T" intersection. The alternative land uses can adequately be served by the existing routes . The District is planning to build a Transportation Center in Huntington Beach adjacent to the 405 Freeway by 1990 . The center will provide bus bays for OCTD, Greyhound, and airport buses, and will enhance the public transportation system. OCTD routes should provide easy access to the center from the study area . 4 . Pedestrian Access The Transit District is requesting that the project include consideration of pedestrian accessways from the interior of the project site to the existing bus stops on the area streets . The accessways should be paved, lighted and handicapped accessible. (0588D) -35- In addition, the accessways could be a system of greenbelts which could provide passive recreation/open space opportunities in residential areas and would provide access to shopping areas and Gibbs Park to the east . 5 . Bicycle Access Bicycle access is currently provided on Heil Avenue and Graham Street . Bolsa Chica Street will eventually provide access when the Bolsa Chica development occurs . Access on Warner Avenue will be discouraged because of the high volume of traffic. 6 . Child Care Facilities If feasible, provision of neighborhood child care facilities should be included in the project because they would reduce the frequency and length of trips related to child care responsibilities . C. Geology: Soils/Seismic The study area is located on the Bolsa Mesa which is an alluvial terrace - a bench like formation of land carved in alluvium * by a stream. Soils encountered trhoughout the site include alluvial deposits of silty clays, silty sands, clayey/sandy silts and, to a minor extent, relatively "clean" sand. ** Organic soils or peat deposits were not encountered, nor was ground water in any of the borings conducted for this report . The information obtained from the soils investigation indicates that the property can be made suitable for development for low rise commercial and residential structures using conventional grading procedures . The surface soils are expansive and this characteristic will require consideraion in design and construction of footings and slabs on a grade. See Appendix H, for a copy of the soils report . Meadowlark Airport, or the study area, is located approximately 5, 000 feet northeast of the Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone for the Newport-Inglewood Fault . The distance from the Special Studies Zone removes the site from any specific Zone related considerations . Figure 5, illustrates the 1986 revised Special Studies Zone in relation to the existing airport and also includes the Bolsa-Fairview Fault . The Bolsa-Fairview Fault is approximately 2, 000 feet southwest of the airport . Although this fault is closer to the airport than the Newport-Inglewood, it is assumed to be less of a threat to that area. A recent fault analysis (1986) prepared by Richard Lung, of Leighton and Associates, stated that the Bolsa-Fairview Fault has not been active in geologic historic times (within the last 10, 000 years) and is not considered a threat or measurable risk to people and/or buildings in the area . The State Division of Mines and Geology has concurred with this assessment . * Alluvium: Any stream laid sediment ** Preliminary soils investigation conducted by H.V. Lawmaster & Co. (0588D) -36- FIGURE 5 STUDY AREA BOLSA—FAIRVIEW FAUL'PS I /nJ . BOFSA WINGER •\ . a Study Area - i NE. M SLATER ZALBERT • 1 i 8 �` a2•ry �\ o 4'.OQVI _ I am .- \ Ls. �•........ ' ..................w+.w,,..•.- �rww««y«r«.�e-m«sbmrrrn.ro --� OAAiIFID J i ADAMS J [( , ATLANTA `' \ ,.....\.......:...........M.......�.................e^^^^.w.....'-^A^'.: MAMITON ...f•.�1\.�_ \. ...................'..-... -.. BANNING YY✓" < Vt L. •Yr 1 STUDY AREA Figure 5 BOLSA—FAIRVIE'll AND NErdPORT— INGLEWOOD FAULTS APTh ?, huntington beach planning department —37— D. Archaeology Meadowlark Airport, the study area, is in an area termed "archaeologically sensitive" by the Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, the regional archaeology clearinghouse. The airport is on the Bolsa Chica Mesa where several prehistoric native American sites have been identified. Studies indicate that the sites were shellfish processing camps (shell middens) . * A site located at the southeast corner of the airport (referred to as ORA-368) was recently investigated by Scientific Resource Survey (SRS) . The investigation was in conjunction with the Warner Avenue Road widening Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment . Preliminary results of the investigation were inconculsive as to the existence of a shell midden on that site. During Phase I of an archaeological assessment* (see footnote) SRS found five areas on the airport that contain ground surface shell materials . ** Based on their surface invetigation SRS recommends a subsurface program to "investigate the nature and content of the shell deposits" in those five areas. E. Environmental Hazards 1 . Hazardous Materials A permit is on file with the Fire Department for an underground fuel storage tank located in the study area . The tank must be removed and the soil must be tested for contamination before development can occur . Clean up may be necessary. Two abandoned wells exist in the study area . The wells must be re-abandoned to current standards, as set forth by the Division of Oil and Gas before construction can occur . The DOG has recommended that construction should be avoided over any abandoned well . Fire Department policy dictates that wells be properly abandoned and that a venting system be installed to allow methane gas to vent safely outside of buildings which are constructed over abandoned wells. A soils analysis should be performed on the entire site to assure that no contamination from hazardous substances has occurred from other causes * Source: Scientific Resource Survey, Phase I Results and Phase II proposals for Archaeological Assessment of the Meadowlark Airport, Huntington Beach, California, April 23, 1986 **Copies of the report are available upon request regarding SRS findings and recommendations . (0588D) -38- i 2 . Flood The study area is located in flood zone "C. " In zone "C" minimal flooding can be expected. No flood mitigation measures are required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency or by the City zoning code. 2 . 1 . 2 . 7 Regional Airport/Air Traffic Impacts If Meadowlark Airport is closed it would have an impact on other airports in the region. In an attempt to measure potential impacts, several agencies were contacted: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA - a division of the Department of Transportation) , the Aeronautics Division of Caltrans, the Long Beach Municipal Airport Administration, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the Orange County Airport Commission. FAA Two individuals were contacted at FAA: Eric Vemear* and Paul Stebelton. ** Vemear stated that the closure of Meadowlark would affect other airports in the region as well as FAA activities . The relocation of the estimated 150+ Meadowlark aircraft would result in securing tie-down space at other airports in Southern California. Because of a shortage of tie-down space in the region, Meadowlark aircraft would be dispersed over a wide area . Relocation activities would involve FAA and become a priority activity delaying other projects such as increasing tie-down space at airports which have reached capacity and needed runway expansion/improvement work. In addition to tie down space and runway improvements, aircraft safety is a primary FAA concern. Paul Stebelton, who provided data on Meadowlark' s recent safety record (see following section ) , stated that aircraft relocation would not pose a measurable impact to aircraft safety in the region. CALTRANS While the FAA' s primary concern is with aircraft and pilot safety, Caltrans Aeronautic Division is concerned with airport operations and safety. Duane Ferguson responded in writing (see Appendix I) , as well as phone conservations, to the possibility of Meadowlark closing . Finding available space at other airports in the region would be a primary issue for Caltrans . Aircraft would have to be relocated over a wide area stretching from Torrance in Los Angeles County to Apple Valley in San Bernardino County. At least 25 percent of Meadowlark Aircraft do not have radios which means that only airports without towers could accommodate them. Non-tower airports can be found in Compton (Los Angeles County) , Corona and Lake Elsinore (Riverside County) , and Upland (San Bernardino County) . * Telephone conversation April 3, 1986 ** Telephone conversation May 5, 1986 (0588D) -39- SCAG The Southern California Association of Governments conducted airport studies in 1979 and 1982 . *** Tim Merwin of SCAG staff**** stated that while SCAG has no jurisdiction regarding private airport planning, the studies they have prepared show a shortage of regional airport capacity by the year 2000 . The closure of Meadowlark could hasten the expected shortage date. Merwin said that the desert is becoming a popular area for small airports and guessed that the majority of Meadowlark aircraft would relocate to desert communities like Apple Valley. ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT COMMISSION Pending 2 . 1 .4 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends Alternative 6 because the array of proposed land uses and residential densities are the most compatible with existing development adjacent to the original study area . The senior portion of this Alternative has been placed outside of the study area for both compatibility with adjacent land uses and to accommodate the mix of uses and densities within the area . The overall lower density reduces traffic, air quality and noise impacts . Adjacent low density uses are buffered by Low Density Residential on 9 . 2 acres . The Medium High Density Residential fronting Heil should be set back sufficiently to buffer low density uses across the street and to meet noise standards . The proximity of commercial services in this mix of land uses provides easy access to shopping opportunities, also contributing to reduced traffic and air quality impacts . Concern about potential traffic impacts on the existing adjacent land uses generated the internal street pattern illustrated in Figure 4 which, in particular, reduces traffic impacts on Pearce Street . The City Engineer suggests that additional traffic studies should be performed if density bonuses are given which increase the overall density. Upon adoption of a land use designation for the study area, staff recommends that preparation of a specific plan be initiated to implement the general plan. The specific plan should incorporate a circulation system similar to that proposed by staff in this report, and should further promote the design of compatible land uses within the adopted land use designations . *** General Aviation Systems Study, Phase I; a revision, Phase II, is expected to be published in December of 1986 . **** Telephone conversation May 21, 1986 . (0588D) -40- APPENDIX A GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AREA 2 . 1 GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS: AREA 2.1 DENSITY POPULATION SEWAGE TRAFFIC STUDENTS POLICE FIRE PARKS (Units/ Persons/ GPD/AC Daily Trips/ Students/Unit Acre Unit (Peaking Dwelling Units Edison/H.B. High Calls/Unit/!'r Calls/Unit/Yr Ac/1000 Pop. LAND USE Factor 2.5) Low Density Residential 7 3.27 2020 9 .21/.26 6 .07 .92 Mobile Home 9 1.5 2020 4.8 .12/.04 .15 .07 .92 Medium Density Residential 15 2 3880 7 .12.04 7 07 .92 Medium High Density Residential 25 1.75 5820 5 .12/04 .7 .07 .92 Senior Citizen Residential 37 1.5 5820 3.3 0 .1 .18 .92 Commercial 30% of 0 3230 600 0 .006 cells/ N/A .92 gr. acreage Sq. Ft. (0588D) APPENDIX B FISCAL IMPACT MODEL TECHNICAL APPENDICES FISCAL IMPACT MODEL TECHNICAL APPENDICES Major revenue and cost impacts are assessed in this analysis for the first full year after development of the proposed project (or alternative) , in current year dollars . Assumptions and planning factors have been derived from staff research, other agency data and private sector sources. Implementation of the model has been aided by the use of a Burroughs B-26 micro-computer using Enhanced Multi-plan software. There are three reas of concern analyzed in General Plan Amendment 87-2; 2 . 1 and 2 .2 and 5 . 1. The technical appendix for the fiscal analysis for area 5 . 0 is contained in section 5 . 0 of this report . This technical appendix contains information for areas 2 . 1 and 2 .2 only. . Area of concern 2 . 1 contains six alternatives and area of concern 2 . 2 containes three alternatives . The following list identifies each area of concern and the alternatives contained therein. The information given below includes the proposed project, estimated market valuations for each alternative and the estimated population generated by each residential scenario : AREA 2.1: Alternative 1 - Existing Use Airport including: administrative building, Meadowlark Cafe, gasoline sales, flight school, air craft repair facilities and residential unit . Total assessed value = $1, 746, 949 . Alternative 2 - Low Density Residential and Mobile Home - 385 Single family detached units - $200, 000 per unit market value - 1, 259 residents based on 3 .27 people/unit - 90 Mobile homes - $50, 000 per unti market value - $246, 150 assessed land value for 10 acre mobile home site - 135 residents based on 1. 5 people/unit - Total population = 1,394 - Total market value = $122, 246, 150 Alternative 3 - Low & Medium Density Residential and Commercial Retail - 245 Single family detached units - $200, 000 per unit market value - 801 residents based on 3 .27 people/unit - 300 Condominium units - $150, 000 per unit market value - 600 residents based on 2 people/unit - 130, 680 square feet of retail commercial development - 104 , 544 square feet of leasable space - Land value = $327, 500 @ $32, 756/acre - Construction value = $7, 840, 800 @ $60 square feet - Total population = 1,401 - Total market value = $102, 168,300 Alternative 4 - Medium Density Residential and Commercial Retail - 825 Condominium units - $150, 000 per unit market value - 1, 650 residents based on 2 people/unit - 130, 680 square feet of retail commercial development - 104 , 544 square feet of leasable space - Land value = $327, 500 @ $32, 750/acre - Construction value = $7, 840, 800 @ $60/acre - Total population = 1, 650 - Total market value = $131, 590,800 Alternative 5 - Medium Density, Medium-high Density and Senior Citizens Residential Developments and Commercial Retail - 450 Condominium units - $140, 000 per unit market value - 900 residents based on 2 people/unit - 375 Apartment/townhome Units - $100, 000 per unit market value - 656 residents based on 1 . 75 people/unit - 250 Senior citizen units - $50, 000 per unit market value - 375 residents based on 1 . 5 people/unit - 196, 020 square feet commercial retail development - 156, 816 square feet of leasable space - Land value = $425, 750 @ $32, 750/acre - Construction value = $12, 775, 010 @ $63/square Foot - Total population = 1, 931 - Total market value = $125, 775, 010 Alternative 6 - Low Density, Medium Density, Medium-high Density and Senior Citizen Residential Plus Commercial 64 Single family units - $200, 000 per unit market value - 209 residents based on 3 . 27 people/unit - 429 Condominium units - $140, 000 per unit market value - 838 residents based on 2 . 0 people/unit - 375 Apartment/townhome units - $100, 000 per unit market value - 656 residents base on 2 . 0 people/unit * Estimate provided by Richard Harlow applicant ' s project manager. 108 Senior citizen units $50, 000 per unit market value 162 residents based on 1 . 5 people unit 159,430 square feet commercial development 127, 544 square feet of leasable space - Land value = $491, 250 @ $32, 750/acre Construction value = $9 , 565, 800 @ $60 square foot Total population = 1, 883 Total market value = $125, 817, 050 Each revenue and cost category used in this analysis is detailed in table format . This format enables the reader to follow the rationale used to achieve the results which are summarized in the report . Summary tables follow the conclusion of this text . Detailed tables are available upon request . AREA 2 .2 : It should be noted that the subject site is located within an established redevelopment area . Property taxes collected from this site will go into the Redevelopment Fund for Huntington Center, not the City' s General Fund. The redevelopment area was established in 1984 for 35 years . Alternative 1 - Existing Use - Approved transportation center including 117 surface park and ride spaces, 15 bus bays and a 1, 200 square foot office building for Greyhound ticket sales . Total assessed value = $1, 581, 704 . Total taxable value = $114 , 204 (this figure excludes the land value since OCTD is not required to pay property taxes) . 1,200 square feet of office development - Construction value $114 , 204 @ $95 . 171 square foot Alternative 2 - Office Use in Airspace Above Transportation Center - Approved transportation center described in Alternative 1 above, plus a 3 . 5 level parking structurte with 492 spaces and 117, 000 gross square fet of office space. - Construction value = $11, 279 , 970 @ $96 .41/square foot - 93 , 600 square feet of leasable space - Land value = 1,467, 500 - Market value (total) _ $12, 861, 674 Alternative 3 - - Approved transportation center as described in Alternative 1 above, plus a 4 . 5 level parking structure with 800 spaces and 210, 000 gross square feet of office space - Construction value = $19 , 706,400 @ $93 . 84/square foot - 168, 000 square feet of leasable space - Land value = $1,467, 500 - Market value (total) _ $21,288, 104 1.0 REVENUES 1. 1 Property Tax Property tax revenue is derived from county property tax placed on new development, which is one percent of the market value of the land and (or) improvements . Of that one percent, the City of Huntington Beach collects, through the General Fund, a specific percent of the revenue, determined by the tax rate area (TRA) in which the proposed project (or alternative) is located. The City is divided into twenty-eight (28) TRA' s ranging from TRA 04-001 to TRA 04-045 . The TRA applicable to GPA 87-2 are the following : TRA' s PERCENT OF 1% REVENUE COLLECTED Area 2 . 1 04-007 19 . 2% Area 2 . 2 04-026 19 . 1% Market value assumptions were based on: 1 . Residential unit value - current residential sales in the City. 2 . Commercial square footage - Caldwell Banker real estate development division, Mike Browning real estate analyst . Spillman, Boatman/Stull & Lee Golden West Transportation Center Joint Development Study for OCTD, October 1986 3 . Commercial land - Orange County tax assessor tax rolls, assessed market valuation of land or land minus improvements . 1 . 2 Sales Tax The State of California places a six percent sales tax on retail sales . Of that six percent the City receives 16 . 6 percent or one cent for every six cents collected. Sales tax for residential projects is based on an estimated family income determined by the unit or house value. The annual retail sales tax collected is then derived from the Internal Revenue Service "Optional State Sales Tax Tables . " It is assumed that a large percent of Huntington Beach residents spend retail dollars outside of the City. Therefore, it is estimated that for every new resident the City captures only 40 percent of the annual retail sales tax revenue generated by that resident . Commercial retail sales tax revenue is based on an estimated sales per gross leasable square feet, (80 percent of the total building square footage) derived from the Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, compiled and published by the Urban Land Institute. For the applicants proposed development (Alternative 5) and Alternatives 3 ,4 and 6, it is assumed that a community shopping center would be appropriate for the commercial portion of the subject site. A community center typically contains an array of business that would include: a supermarket, chain drug store, restaurant, clothing store, etc. There usually are services that do not generate retail sales such as a cleaners , hair stylist and a bank. These uses that do not generate sales tax revenue would comprise approximately 10 percent of the community center . Within this 10 percent, the portion of the supermarket that does not generate retail sales tax is also included. 1. 3 Utility User and Franchise Tax Huntington Beach collects a five percent utility user tax on the annual sales of electricity, natural gas, water, telephone and cable television services in the City. A franchise tax of one percent of the annual electricity sales and four percent of the annual natural gas sales is collected from the respective utility providers in the City. Factors used for this section of the analysis are as follows . i Electricity According to the California Energy Commission, average electricity charges are: Residential = $36 . 99 per unit, per month* Commercial = . 0894 cents per kilowatt hour, using 12 . 2 KWH per square foot per year applied to commercial and recreation developments . Natural Gas Average natural gas charges are: Residential = $33 . 02 per unit, per month Commercial = $. 669 per million BTU' s, using an annual rate of .42 BTU' s per square foot applied to commercial and recreational developments . Water Based on City Water Department analyses : Average residential water billing is $18 . 69 for a two month 1 period, per unit . Data on commercial billing can not be identified per unit or store because one water meter may service many units or stores . Commercial water customers include all customers except residential and comprise approximately 27 percent of the water billings in the City. Research is in progress in order to attempt to estimate revenue generated by commercial water customers . Therefore, commercial water billing revenue is not included in this analysis . Telephone General Telephone is unable to provide the City with any data on average phone billings for residential or commercial customers . They do not compile the type of information that would be appropriate for a fiscal analysis . ** An average estimated residential telephone bill is forty dollars ($40 . 00) per month. This data was derived from the Holly Property EIR. However, there are no studies available at this time from either public or private sources that could enable staff to estimate an average commercial telephone billing . * Figures have been rounded in the analysis ** John Kiefer, General Telephone, Tax Payment Department Cable Television For cable T.V. service in the City, the basic rate paid by residents is $12 . 50 per month. (This figure was rounded to $13 . 00 in the analysis . ) It is assumed that all new residents in the City will subscribe to the cable service. 1 .4 Business License Fee The City requires all businesses, commercial and industrial, in the City to have a license. Business license fees are based on the number of employees per business and also a fee per number of trucks . It is not feasible to estimate the number of trucks per business, but employees have been estimated based on the following assumptions . An Urban Land Institute study reported an average of 10, 776 square feet per business in a community shopping center . The common planning actor used for retail commercial business is one employee per 500 square feet of leasable space. For a non-retail business such as a bank, the employee per square foot factor that is applicable is one employee per 250 square feet . However, since the majority of uses in a community center are P retail, only the retail employee factor per square feet will be used in this analysis . 1 . 5 Additional Revenue Additional revenue is generated by new residential development on a per capita basis . This revenue is derived from funds* collected by the State of California that are distributed back to local municipalities using a formula that is primarily based on that municipality' s population. In the Preliminary City Budget, Fiscal Year 1986-1987, four major revenue items are applicable to this analysis . Based on the January 1986 State Department of Finance population estimate for Huntington Beach of 184 ,300, the revenues are calculated as follows : Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties is $2, 195, 000 divided by 184 , 300 equals $11 . 90 per capita . Cigarette Tax is $532, 100 divided by 184 , 300 equals $2 . 89 per capita . Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax is $5, 248, 000 divided by 184 , 300 and equals $28 .48 per capita . Gas Tax Funds (2107 and 2107. 5) are $1, 620, 600 divided by 184,300 equaling $8 . 79 per capita . * State subventions . 2.0 COSTS Research and discussions with each department have resulted in the application of different methods to assess relative costs . These results depended on the amount of data available and the level of automation in each department . For example, the police department has the most sophisticated data analysis related to activity by type of land use. Working with police department computerized archival data it was possible to assess the number of calls for a particular type of land use. The number of calls has a direct relationship to the number of officers needed, and, ultimately; a recommendation for the hiring of additional officers based on the impacts from development . 2 . 1 Cost Assumptions The City of Huntington Beach Preliminary Budget, Fiscal Year 1986-1987, was used as the primary source for this section of the analysis . Capital expenditures were excluded from the budgot as they are not applicable to the proposed development . The applicable programs under each budget item can generally be assigned to privately developed acreage in the City on the following basis : Residential land uses comprise approximately 78 percent of privately developed acres, commercial land uses comprise 10 percent and industrial land 'uses comprise 12 percent . Where appropriate, this land use distribution will be used to assess cost impacts . 2 .2 General and Administration Expenditures While this fund includes numerous programs (a total of 20) , new development Would measurably impact only the non-departmental (budget program 101) category. Non-departmental activities range from City utility expenditures to liability program expenditures and comprise, of the 1986-87 budget, $7, 950, 300 . The most equitable method of distributing this expenditure is on a cost per acre, regardless of the type of land use. There are approximately 12, 230 privately developed acres in the City and divided into the above budget figure results in a cost per acre of $650 . 2 . 3 Police Department From surveys of major land uses in the City police calls per type of development were derived. The police calls by type of land use are as follows : POLICE CALLS/UNIT LAND USE OR SQUARE FEET Residential -Single family . 60/unit -Multi-family low density . 70/unit -Multi-family Multi-story and high density . 55/unit Commercial 1/1693 square feet Office and retail or . 0006 calls per square foot Industrial 1/2328 square feet or . 0004 calls per square foot Calls relate to the number of additional officers per year that would be needed to service new development. A patrol officer ' s average annual salary, including benefits, is $54 , 000 . Five or more officers would result in capital expenditures, such as a vehicle. When calls per year reach 535, the Police Department would recommend hiring an officer . For the purpose of this analysis, it will be assumed that the Department will incur a cost whether the calls for a particular project reach 535 or a portion of that total . Calls by type of land use and estimated annual costs for alternatives in each area are shown in detailed tables that are available upon request . 2 .4 Fire Department It is the the assessment of Fire Department Staff, primarily Tom Poe (Deputy Fire Marshall, Fire Prevention Division) , that new residential development will impact two programs : Public Safety Administration, Program No. 300 and Public Safety, Fire Control Program 302 . The total 1986-1987 budget for these programs, minus capital expenditures, is $7, 528, 860 . The majority of public safety activity, approximately 75 percent, is provided to residential land uses in the City. Assuming costs for public safety on a per capita basis the result would be as follows : ($7, 528, 860) ( . 75) _ $5, 646, 645 divided by the 1986 City population of 184 , 300 = $31 per capita . Commercial land uses, however, have a relatively small impact on the Fire Department . Six percent of Fire Safety service (programs 300 and 302) can be attributed to commercial uses, or ( . 06) ($7, 528, 860)=$451, 732 . In addition to Fire Safety, Commercial uses also impact program 308, Hazmat Response Unit . It is estimated that 25 percent of the 1986-87 program budget or ( .25) ($36, 130) _ $9 , 033 can be attributed to commercial uses . Of the three programs the total cost is $460, 765 . Applied on a per acre basis the cost distribution is $460, 765 divided by 1223 commercial acres = $377 per acre. 2 . 5 Community Services According to Jim Engle, Superintendent of Recreation and Parks Development, none of the development scenarios analyzed in General Plan Amendment 87-2 would require and/or generate an increase in park acreage in the City. Nor would those scenarios require an increase in community services staff or existing programs that are not self supporting . In addition to any park development costs incurred by the proposed project, it is assumed that new residents in the City will have some impact on the cost of park maintenance. Although park maintenance is a budgeted program within the Public Works department, it will be shown under Community Services in order to identify the cost impacts separate from other Public Works programs . According to Daryl Smith, Superintendent of Park Maintenance, it costs the City $3, 000 per year, per acre, to maintain the parks . In order to determine a cost per capita the following formula was developed: There are currently 555 acres of park land that are included in the $3 , 000 per acre, per year cost . The current City population is 184 , 300 . Park acreage divided by population results in . 003 acres of park per person that are maintained by the City. Park acreage per person multiplied by cost per acre results in an annual park maintenance cost per capita of $9 .00 . Acreage Maintenance Annual Maintained Population Cost Cost/Capita (555) / (184, 300) _ . 003 ($3, 000) _ ($9 . 00) 2 . 6 Public Works In a discussion with Les Evans, City Engineer, it was determined that the scope of development assessed in this analysis would only have a measurable impact on Public Works Programs 530 and 531, sewer maintenance. Mr . Evans also stated that residential development generates the greatest impact on sewer maintenance in the City. For budget year 1986-1987 the total cost for sewer maintenance is $580, 893 . Since residential generates the largest impact it is realistic to measure that impact on a per capita basis . For commercial land uses the cost will be measured on a per acre basis . Residential costs are as follows : I Seventy eight percent of $580, 893 = $453, 097 divided by the 1986 population estimate of 184 , 300 = $2 .46 per capita. The per acre cost is derived from the balance of the programs which equals $127, 796 divided by 2, 691 acres (commercial and industrial) and results in $47 . 50 per acre. Summary tables of revenues versus costs, for each area, immediately follow this text . The computer print-out containing detailed tables of each catagory discussed in this appendix are available upon request . The computer print-out containing detailed tables of each catagory discussed in this appendix are available upon request . APPENDIX C MEADOWLARK MARKET REPORT OUTLINE AREA 2 . 1 MEADOWLARK MARKET REPORT OUTLINE Based on growth in the subject area related to population, household income and traffic, plus existing commercial retail occupancy rates and taxable sales, Laventhol & Horwath are recommending that the Meadowlark Airport site will support a commercial retail center . Results of the market analysis prepared for the Nerio Family include the following: The Meadowlark site should be able to support a phased neighborhood center consisting of 70, 000 to 90, 000 square feet of space in a Phase One development program; an amount which could potentially be absorbed during an 18 month leasing period. Phase Two, to be developed one year following completion of Phase One, should consist of a 50, 000 square foot addition, for a total of 140, 000 square feet . Suggested tenant types include a supermarket to serve as a major anchor tenant, a small drug/pharmacy store and a variety of apparel outlets . Other specialized stores and suggested tenant types are indicated in Recommended Tenant Mix. This center would also include space for a restaurant and fast food service. Assumptions used to support the market report findings are as follows : 1 . Population - number of people and age aggregates . The report states that in 1980, 58 percent of the population within a three-mile trade radius were 25 to 75 years old. In 1991, this group is estimated to grow to 67 percent along with growth in the total population. Therefore, there is now and will be a population to support existing and future commercial entities in the area . 2 . Income - again, with a three-mile radius . The average annual income for 52 percent of all households exceeds $35, 000 . By 1991, it is estimated that 61 percent of that population will have an income exceeding $35, 000 . 3 . Traffic - increasing daily trips represent strong commercial traffic in the area. 4 . Occupancy rate - for competitive centers surveyed the rate was 95 percent indicating strong demand for retail stores in the area . 5 . Taxable Sales - between 1980 and 1985 taxable sales in the City increased by an annual average of 11 percent which was higher than surrounding cities . The report predicts an annual increase to 13 percent by 1991. Below is a table which projects revenue for commercial centers within a three-mile radius of Meadowlark Airport . (1) (2) (3) Supportable Growth in Typical New Retail SF Sales Potential Dollar 1986-1991 Store Type 1986-1991 Sales Per SF (1)/(2) Variety Stores $ 487, 000 $309 1, 580 Grocery Stores 12, 539 , 000 303 41, 350 Apparel Stores 3, 299, 000 140 23, 570 Shoe Stores 558, 000 156 3 , 580 Jewelry Stores 661, 000 299 2 , 210 Restaurants 6 , 542, 000 277 23 , 600 Drug Stores 2, 201, 000 182 12, 100 Liquor Stores 1, 252, 000 189 6 , 630 Total 114 , 620 Source: Urban Decision Systems Laventhol & Horwath Real Estate Advisory Services i APPENDIX D TRAFFIC: LEVELS OF SERVICE AREA 2 . 1 LEVELS OF SERVICE The concept of levels of service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists . A level-of-service definition generally described these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, conform and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined. They are given letter designations, from A to F, with Leval of Service 'A' representing the best operating conditions and Level of Service 'F' the worst . Level of Volume/ Service Definition Capacity A Represents free flow. Individual users 0 . 00 - 0 . 60 are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort and convenience is excellent. B Is in the range of stable flow, but the 0 . 61 - 0 . 70 presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from LOS 'A' . The level of comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less that at LOS 'A' , because the presence of others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior . C Is in the range of stable flow, but marks 0 . 71 - 0 . 80 the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by interactions with others in the traffic stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the presence of toehrs, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires substantial viligiance on the part of the user . The general level of comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level . LEVELS OF SERVICE (Continued) Level of Definition Volume/ Service Capacity D Represents high-density, but stable, flow. 0 . 81 - 0 . 90 Speed and freedom to maneuver are severly restricted, and the driver experiences a generallly poor level of comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this level . E Represents operating conditions at or near the 0 . 91 - 100 capacity level . All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver with the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedestrian to "give way" to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and driver frustration is generally high. Operations ; at this level are usually unstable, because small increases in flow or minor perturbations within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns . F It used to define forced or breakdown flow. over 1 . 00 This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point . Queues form behind such locations . Operations within the queue are characterized by stop-and-go waves, and they are extremely unstable. Vehicles may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more, then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board Special Report No . 209 , Washington, D.C. 1985 The Table below lists estimated average daily traffic (ADT) at various levels of service by roadway classification. ARTERIAL ADT AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Type of Maximum ADT and Corresponding Level of Service Arterial Description A B C D E F Major 6 lanes, divided 36, 000 40, 500 45, 000 49 , 500 54 , 000 Primary 4 lanes, divided 24, 000 27, 000 30, 000 33, 000 36, 000 Secondary 4 lanes, undivided 16, 000 18, 000 20, 000 22, 000 24 , 000 Commuter 2 lanes, undivided 5 , 000 7, 500 10, 000 12, 500 15, 000 *Volumes greater than maximum ADT at LOS 'E' The City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department utilizes a 2, 500 maximum ADT for residential streets as an acceptable level of service. APPENDIX E ANALYSIS OF ADJACENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: AREA 2 . 1 I Analysis of Adjacent Proposed Development : Area 2 . 1 The Planning Commission reviewed a proposal for development on an adjacent site on July 1, 1986, and had concerns regarding access to future development in the Meadowlark area and circulation on Pearce Drive. the item was continued and staff was directed to explore alternative street layouts . At the August 5, 1986 meeting, seven alternatives were proposed. Three alternatives were reviewed in depth. They were as follows : Alternative #2 This layout is a slight modification to the applicant ' s request and shows eight lots off a short cul-de-sac. The lots are rectangular in shape which eliminates the need for a variance for reduced lot width and frontage. Access to Bolsa Chica would be limited to right turns into and out of "A" Street . Moody Circle would remain unchanged. A maximum of 28 units could be obtained. Alternative #3 This concept entails a connection between the proposed "A" Street cul-de-sac and existing Moody circle to the north. A connection could be made by acquiring lot #6 of Tract 12206 and extending Moody circle southerly to an L-shaped "A" Street within the proposed subdivision. The new subdivision would have eight lots and a maximum of 28 apartment units . Lot #6 is currently vacant and conversion ton a street would result in a loss of one lot and three units from the northerly tract . At the north end of Moody Circle, an emergency gate and landscaping could be provided. The driveways on the two northerly developments could serve as turnaround areas . Additional on-street parking would be created between lots #5 and #6 of Tract 12206 . Alternative #6 This alternative combines access from Bolsa Chica to Moody Circle and from Bolsa Chica to parcels east of the subject property and future Meadowlark Airport development . Acquisition of lot #6 of Tract 12206 for the Moody Circle extension and an easterly extension of "A: Street to the easterly property line would be necessary. In response to the alternatives, the applicant preferred #2 . He stated in regards to #3 and #6 that the project would not be feasible if he had to acquire lot #6 of Tract #12206; and the owner of lot #6 indicated he is unwilling to sell lot #6 for street purposes . Thus, if the City required the re-routing of Moody Circle as a condition of approval and the applicant was unsuccessful in acquiring the lot, the City must then be prepared to initiate condemnation proceedings to obtain lot #6 at fair market value. Pertaining to the three alternatives, the Planning Commission had concerns regarding the safety of the project in relation to the Meadowlark Airport traffic and inadequate access to adjacent existing and proposed developments necessary to alleviate traffic problems, due to the mandatory processing time and the unwillingness of the applicant to extend the processing time for further analysis, the Planing Commission acted and denied the request . On August 18, 1986, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance to institute a building moratorium on Moody Circle directly north of the subject property. The moratorium will remain in effect until August 21, 1987 . rib-26 IfL h Z �• BOLSA (:IHC,Q • 4 • `� 'I i ,Mw..C..a!!Sapp 0) vol W 17, / I' .I ` • �.. ' „ J/•. 14 . �� \�1/ 011 r• ► � •�W •04II CI•ij:: .•�R 1 4) (t do VV ® (10 K ... ' • � ;loostrt�l I �41iI! dome + U Q Q r , •O .... Q . 4 • 1 1 176-2G BOL SA cHica ,hl;, ,�U• N � 1 � • i1�i ' •�^�.. �1 I ;� m �. w nor tA�f11�1 AA SM 0 1 •.� •'� - ' 31 t., 9.1 .. ,... �o �� i) �. � •� '--Lt� �rat p�gtt� �,•�. N Y r err • of � Y •� � (j,� lul ��: �� .• gip• 4® ROOSEat r SI �v 1.,• k . _ �cAOJtrttr SAW 1 • � \ as '� �• V V • " U � � • �• 'r ® ' U ' t C► 'U ® �1 It n !I I Ty s ' i P P' a• BDLSA CHICA t.SIIrEET lag, y, �� ,. o �... r .4 h� Ti kT) - A flD �® t I M� W 1 1� � (. • r, ll�Ji U qpIM ROOMVE[r S/ • ' , t^ 7�oz co � art •® (� •'4 a APPENDIX F TRAFFIC: TRIP GENERATION FOR ALTERNATIVE LAND USES AREA 2 . 1 TRIP GENERATION FOR ALTERNATIVE LAND USES: AREA 2.1 LT LA T. 2 LT LA T. 4 LA T. 5 ALT. UNITS/ TRIP RATE LAND USE ACRE RATE UNIT UNITS TRIP UNITS TRIP UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS UNITS TRIPS UNITS RIP Residential Low 6.5 9.0 D.U. 385 3465 245 2205 64 576 Medium 15.0 7.0 D.U. 300 2100 825 5775 450 3150 429 3003 Med High 25.5 5.0 D.U. 375 1875 375 1875 Mobile Home 9.0 4.8 D.U. 90 432 Sr. Citizen 3.3 D.U. 250 825 108 356 Commercial 600.0 ACRE 10AC 6000 10AC 6000 14AC 8400 12.2 7320 TOTAL 3897 10305 11775 14250 13130 (0588D) APPENDIX G AIR QUALITY CALCULATIONS AREA 2 . 1 AIR QUALITY CALCULATIONS Area 2 . 1 ALTERNATIVE 1 No data on emmissions of airplanes . ALTERNATIVE 2 Type of Unit Size NONHOME BASED EMISSIONS Mobile Home 90 Units Carbon Monoxide (T/Y = 0 Single Family Housing 385 Units Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 0 Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) =0 NONHOME BASED Trips VMT Fuel Consumption Nonwork 0 0 (Gal/Year) = 0 Work 0 0 Total 0 0 HOME BASED EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide (T/Y) = 181 HOME BASED Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 20 Trips VMT Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 12 Home-Work 1399 12297 Home-Shop 1077 3478 Fuel Consumption Home-Other 2629 13618 (Gal/Year) = 349193 Total 5105 29394 Assumes Temperature = 55 ALTERNATIVE 3 Type of Unit Size NONHOME BASED EMISSIONS Single Family Housing 245 Units Carbon Monoxide (T/Y = 299 Condominiums 300 Units Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 44 Shopping Center 130680 sq. ft. Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 29 NONHOME BASED Trips VMT Fuel Consumption Nonwork 17288 94219 (Gal/Year) = 885084 Work 352 2854 Total 17640 97074 HOME BASED EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide (T/Y) = 179 HOME BASED Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 20 Trips VMT Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 11 Home-Work 1380 12130 Home-Shop 1063 3433 Fuel Consumption Home-Other 2595 13442 (Gal/Year) = 344601 Total 5038 29005 Assumes Temperature = 55 ALTERNATIVE 4 Type of Unit Size NONHOME BASED EMISSIONS Condominiums 825 Units Carbon Monoxide (T/Y = 299 Shopping Center 130680 sq. ft . Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 44 Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 29 NONHOME BASED Trips VMT Fuel Consumption Nonwork 17288 94219 (Gal/Year) = 885084 Work 352 2584 Total 17640 97074 HOME BASED EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide (T/Y) = 205 HOME BASED Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 23 Trips VMT Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 13 Home-Work 1582 13905 Home-Shop 1218 3934 Fuel Consumption Home-Other 2949 15405 (Gal/Year) = 394955 Total 5774 33245 Assumes Temperature = 55 ALTERNATIVE 5 Type of Unit Size NONHOME BASED EMISSIONS Condominiums 450 Units Carbon Monoxide (T/Y = 233 Low Rise Apartments 375 Units Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 34 Retirement Community 250 Units Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 22 Shopping Center 196020 sq. ft . NONHOME BASED Trips VMT Fuel Consumption Nonwork 13446 73280 (Gal/Year) = 688404 Work 274 2222 Total 13720 75502 HOME BASED EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide (T/Y) = 254 HOME BASED Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 29 Trips VMT Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 16 Home-Work 1959 17219 Home-Shop 1508 4870 Fuel Consumption Home-Other 3682 19072 (Gal/Year) = 489011 Total 7149 41163 Assumes Temperature = 55 • i . ALTERNATIVE 6 Type of Unit Size NONHOME BASED EMISSIONS Single Family Housing 64 Units Carbon Monoxide (T/Y = 189 Condominiums 429 Units Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 28 Low Rise Apartment 375 Units Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 18 Retirement Community 108 Units Shopping Center 159429 sq. ft . Fuel Consumpton (Gal/Year) = 559909 NONHOME BASED Trips VMT Nonwork 10936 59601 Work 233 1808 Total 11159 61409 HOME BASED EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide (T/Y) = 256 HOME BASED Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 29 Trips VMT Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 17 Home-Work 1973 17342 Home-Shop 1519 4906 Fuel Consumption Home-Other 3709 19212 (Gal/Year) = 492565 Total 7201 41461 Assumes Temperature = 55 Area 2 . 2 Air emission calculations for Alternative 1, Area 2 .2 were not available. The emission generation numbers noted in Alternatives 2 and 3 below do not include emissions that will be generated by the transportation facility. ALTERNATIVE 2 Type of Unit Size NONHOME BASED EMISSIONS General Office 17, 000 sq. ft . Carbon Monoxide (T/Y = 51 Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 7 Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 4 NONHOME BASED Trips VMT Fuel Consumption Nonwork 1085 5640 (Gal/Year) = 114727 Work 719 5831 Total 17640 97074 HOME BASED EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide (T/Y) = 205 HOME BASED Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 23 Trips VMT Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 13 Home-Work 0 0 Home-Shop 0 0 Fuel Consumption Home-Other 0 0 (Gal/Year) = 0 Total 0 0 Assumes Temperature = 55 ALTERNATIVE 3 Type of Unit Size NONHOME BASED EMISSIONS General Office Bldg. 210000 sq. ft. Carbon Monoxide (T/Y = 92 Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 12 Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 8 NONHOME BASED Trips VMT Fuel Consumption Nonwork 1858 10126 (Gal/Year) = 205977 Work 1291 10470 Total 3149 20596 HOME BASED EMISSIONS Carbon Monoxide (T/Y) = 0 HOME BASED Hydrocarbons (T/Y) = 0 Trips VMT Nitrogen Oxides (T/Y) = 0 Home-Work 0 0 Home-Shop 0 0 Fuel Consumption Home-Other 0 0 (Gal/Year) = 0 Total 0 0 Assumes Temperature = 55 APPENDIX H RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION AREA 2 . 1 i fi:!7H.VLawmaster & co., bin lc. G E O T E C H N I C A l E N G I N E E I N G 714- 829 9040 July 18, 1986 7940 MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 246 STANTON_ CAL 90690 ! ' Mr. Richard Nerio -� c/o Bolsa Realty 9340 Bolsa Avenue Westminster, California 92683 rV Project: Proposed Meadowlark Airport Redevelopment File No. 86-10013 Huntington Beach, California G Subject: Results of Preliminary Soil Investigation Dear Mr. Nerio: In accordance with our Proposal letter dated April 15, 1986, we have completed Phase 1 of the geotechnical engineering study for the project site. A total of 15 borings ranging between 16 and 20 feet in depth were drilled with T. .Y a 24-inch-diameter, bucket-auger on June 30, July 1 and 2, 1986. Approximate boring locations are shown on the enclosed plan. The soils encountered throughout the area include alluvial deposits of SILTY CLAYS, SILTY SANDS, CLAYEY/SANDY SILTS and, to a relatively minor extent, rela- tively "clean" SAND. Organic soils or peat deposits were not encountered in any boring drilled for this preliminary study. Also, groundwater was not en- countered within the depths penetrated. Field logs detailing the soils were recorded and moisture contents were deter- mined for the various soils. This information will be included in the report covering Phase 2 of the geotechnical investigation. ALL REPORTS SUBMITTED BY THIS OFFICE BECOME THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THE CLIENT AND ANY REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES OF REPORTS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE CLIENT. Mr. Richard Nerio File No. 86-10813 Project: Meadowlark Airport Redevelopment July 18, 1986 The information obtainer' to date indicates that the property can be made suit- able for redevelopment for low-rise commercial and residential structures using conventional grading procedures. The surface soils are expansive and this char- acteristic will require consideration in design and construction of footings and slabs on grade. Spread footings are compatible with indicated soil conditions; however, differing conditions requiring special consideration: may be encountered during the Phase 2 portion of this investigation. We have completed Phase 1 of this investigation in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice. No further warranty, expressed or implied, is offered as to the comments included in this report. Thank you for this opportunity to be of assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any question about this report or require further assistance at this time. Very truly yours, I H. V. LAWMASTER & CO. ,INC. Don P. Harrington, P.E. President Registration Expires 6/30/89 DPH:nh Enclosure (S copies submitted) i f I -2- H. V. LAWMASTER & CO., INC. APPENDIX I REGIONAL AIRPORT/AIR TRAFFIC IMPACTS RESPONSES AREA 2 . 1 STATE OF C^.,IfORNIA—BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEAAN,,Gorernor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION =; DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS M 1130 K STREET-4T.4 FLOOR o MAIL:P.O-BOX 1499 SACRAMENTO,CA 95807 (916)322=3090 HO TDD 323-7665 June 1 7 , 1986 HUNTINGTON BEACH OEVELONAENT SERVICES Ms . Diaria Teran Blaisure Assistant Planner Citv of Huntington Beach P . 0 . B o x 190 Huntingtoh Beach, CA ' z64- Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Dear Ms . Blaisure : The closure of Meadowlark Airport would have several impacts on the immediate area , including Huntington Beach , Orange County , Los Angeles County and manv airports in the. area . Our records indicate that there are over 150 aircraft based at Meadowlark . Should Meadowlark close , the closest airports that these aircraft could relocate to are Long Beach , Fullerton and John Wayne-Orange County Airports . As you can see , these airports are quite a distance for residents of Huntington Beach to drive . Ail of these airports have towers and many of the aircraft at Meadowlark do not have radios . They would either have to bear the expense of purchasing a radio or relocate to a non-tower airport such as Compton , Corona , Cable (Upland ) or Skylark ( Lake Elsinore ) Airlorts , which are even further from Huntington Beach . Relocating aircraft out of Orange County would also mean that property taxes on these aircraft would be collected by another county . If you have any questions or if we can provide additional information , please let us know. Sincerely , JACK D . KEMMERLY , Chief Di ision of Aeronautics �Gc LIt �Al �LT_'/ Duane H . Ferguson Aviation Consultant . APPENDIX J INITIAL STUDY I I i I " I i CITY OF HUNTI,NGTON LEACH P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF DEV=LOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION 7141 535-5241 PLANNING 0--.0SION 1714) 536-5271 Sta=e Clearinghouse 1400 loth Street , Room 121 Sacramento, California 95814 Attention : Glenn Stober Subject : SCH# 86031206 Dear Mr . Stober : On March 7, 1986 I mailed your office a Notice of Preparation for General Plan Amendment No. 86-1 . Your office assigned the project SCH# 86031206 . This letter is to request that General Plan Amendment 86-1 be changed to General Plan Amendment 87-2 and that an additional item be added to the amendment . in the nine ( 9 ) months since the Notice of Preparation was submitted, the City has been waiting for the applicant to complete certain studies needed for the Environmental Impact Report . The studies are now nearly complete, but it will be impossible to process the document until 1987 . As such, we would like to change ' the General Plan. Amendment number from 86-1 to 87-2 . Additionally, we now have a request by the Orange County Transit District to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation on 2 . 7 acres of property located on the northeast corner of Gothard Street and Center Drive from Public, Quasi-Public, Institutional to mixed Development . The proposal is for a Transportation Center featuring park and ride facilities and fifteen ( 15 ) bus bays , and 210, 000 square feet of office space constructed over the Transportation Center . The Transportation Center is already approved, but the office project cannot be considered until a General Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Report are adopted . Please let me know if this request can be added to SCH# 86031206 . Alternatively, perhaps SCH# 86031206 could be withdrawn and a new Notice of Preparation submitted for the two items . I have prepared an Environmental Checklist Form and Notice of Preparation for the new request and have enclosed it here. If you have any questions concerning this request please contact me at ( 714 ) 536-5271 . Sincerer-, v�e7� al Simmons Associate Planner ( 6878d) Attachments : Environmental Checklist Form, dated December 18, 1986 Notice of Preparation dated December 18, 1986. APPENDIX J NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: St FROM: City of Huntington Beach k .esponsiL-ieAgency) (LeadAgency) Main Street ress ess Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: Notice c'- Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report City of Huntington be the Lead Agency and will prepare an environmental impact report for 're project identified below. We reed to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to se the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. the project description, location, and the probable environmental effects are contained in the avn.ched me*,trials. A copy of the Initial Study X is, is not, attached. Cur to the time limi,.s mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not voter than 45 days after receipt of this notice. Please serf your resperse to Hal Simmons at the address shown 000ve. We will need tree name or a con.oct person in your agent/. Project Title: General Plan Land Use Element Amendment No. 87-2 Project Applicant, if r,,r/- City of Huntington Beach DATE j Z-'/ g1�6 Signature Title Associate Planner Te Iephone (714) 536-5271 Reference: Coliforr;c .administrative Code, Title 14, Sections 15035.7, 150S4.3, 15066. 122 i � APPENDIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CNECXLIST FORM (To Ee Completed By Lecd Agency) I. Bockyround I. Noire of Proponent City of Huntington Beach 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (710 536-5271 3. Date of necklist Si.bmitted December 18, 1986 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Huntington Beach S. `+cme of Proposal, if oppliccble General Plan Amendment No. 87-2 II. Environmental 'rpocts 'Exp!anations of all "yes" cnd "-raYbe" answers are required on attached meets.) Yes Mcybe t�:o ! . Earth. :':;.I the aroposol result in: ec:rth conditions or in changes in gez.o<j=c substructures'. X o. Disr,;P';ors, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? x C. Chore in topography or ground surface relief iectures? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Chenyes in deposition or erosion of beach scnds, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosiot. which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X 115 Yes Mc Mbe No _ g. Exposure of people or property to geolo- ?ic `)czards such cs narthquckes, landslides, X r^.;•'s:ides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ?. Air. Hitt the proposal result in: (I. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient :ir quali!y? X b. The c-e'7t)nn of objectionable odors? X C. A::e-atjon of air movement, moisture, or tef^Derature, or cny change in climate, X ei:. er iocally or regionally? 3. 'Hater. Will the proposal result in: a. Chcn;es in currents, or the course of di- re.:':-n of water movements, in either X mcr!;+e or fresh waters? b. C icnges in abscrption rates, drainage pat- terns, or !ne rate and amount of surface ru rn i'? X c. A;tercticns to the course or flow of flood wa!"rs? _X r;. C hcr(: in t`+e •-imount of surface water in ;:,y ..uter body'• X Disc'-crge into •.:,rface waters, or in any al:r_rotion of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dis�oived oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow X of ground waters? g. Chcrce in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water r otherwise available for public water supp lies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water re- X lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 116 Yes Maybe ivo 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Charge in the diversity of species, or numbe- of any species of plants (including trees, s:-rubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X b. Reduction of the nunnbers of any unique, rare or .-ndongered species of plants'. c. Introdtr_tion of new species of plants into an area, or in a barricr to the normal X replei.6hment of existing species? d. Redk.;c-on in acreage of any agricultural X crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change 'n the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, :end animals including reptiles, fish and shellVsh, benthic organisms or insects)? X a. Reduction of the rx;rrbers of any unique, rare or endcNered species of animals? X C. Introduction of new species of animals into _ an cr_,3, or result in a bcrr;er to the X migra:icn or movement of animals? d. Deter;cr ition to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and ;fare. Will the proposal produce X new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub- stcntial a.;crGdon of the present or planned land use of an area? X • 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources' X 117 t Yes Maybe b. Substcntial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource'. X 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involves a. A rmk of an ex7losion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or rodiat1w) in the event of an occident or upset conditions' X b. Pos.:.ble interference, with an emerg-ncy response plan or an emergency evacuation X plan. II. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribu'ion, density, or growth rate of the human pop-ilaticn of an area? X 12. Housing. Nill the proposal affect existing hous- ing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Tran:,portation/Circulation, Will the proposal result ir.; a. Genero-:on of substantial cdditional venic�,lar movement? X o. Effrc--, on exi.,olog parking faci!ities, or de:rei , for new parik irg? X C. Substcntial ir-pact upon existing transpor- tati-o.i systems'. X d. Alteretions to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air X traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Lc.-vices. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered c,.,• ernmental services in any of the following crecs: a. Fire protection? X b. Poli<f- protection? X c. Schools? X I18 Yes M No d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X 0%. MnintPnunce of public facilities, includinq X roods.' f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Subs-rntinl increase in demand upon exist- ing sources of energy; or require the deve!rr)ment of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will th& proposal result in a need for new s•-stems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power r natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X C. Water' X Sewer or septic tanks? Y _ e. Storr, water drainage? X f. So lia v •s'e and disposal? X 17. i umvi He...h. Will the proposal result in: 0. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X b. Exposure of people to potential health X haz cads? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction. of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of on aestheticaliy offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in on impact upcA, the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Cultural Reuxwrces. is. Will t'l proposal result in the alteration of or the destrvction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X 119 Yes Mfffbe No . b. Wi:l the proposal result in adverse physical or oesthetic effects to a prehistoric or his*rxic building, structure, or object? X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cc:.se a physical change which would affect X unique ethnic cultural values? _ d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential inTact area? X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sul,.,tsntially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self sus- tairii:y levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the rv,r.lber or restrict the range of a rare or endcrreered p!cnt or animal or eliminate imr-rtcnt excmples of the major periods of ( .iiifornia history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to ac: eve short-term, to the Jisadvontcge of ' Innq-term, environmental gals? (A short- tern nDoct on the environment is one whit- occurs in a reiatively brief, definitive pe-c•.7 of time while long-term impacts X will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have imipects which are indiv:wally limited, but cumulatively can- sideri^le? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those X impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Dees the project have environmental effects wh 7h will ccuse substantial adverse effects X on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 111. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Determination: (To be comple;z!J by the Lead Agency) 120 On the basis of-'this' initial evoluat,on: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect II---) on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. t_ I find that althou.jh the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposes project MAY have a significant effect on the env'ron- — ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. X i Date Si ncture For (Note: This is only a suggested form. Public agencies are free to devise their own format for initial studies.) EXPLANATION OF 'YES' AND 'MAYBE' ANSWERS la . Portions of the site may be composed of soils with high clay and/or peat and organic content and may therefore require excavation and replacement of soil . lb. Construction on the site may require compaction or displacement of soil . lc. Grading and landscaping may cause a change in ground surface relief features. le. During grading and construction there may be a temporary increase in wind and/or water erosion of soils on the site . lg. The Newport-Inglewood Earthquake Fault System passes through the City. 2a . Additional vehicular traffic associated with the proposed project may result in some deterioration of ambient air quality. 3b . Construction may alter the flow of runoff from the site. 6a . Development of the site will generate human and vehicle noise . 7 . Development of the site will result in additional street lights . Additionally, glare may result from glass sided buildings . 8 . The site is presently planned for Public, Quasi-Public, Institutional . The proposal is for Mixed Development which would allow a multi-story office building. 12. The proposal will generate a substantial number of employees , some of whom may need housing in the City. 13a . The proposal will generate vehicular traffic. 13b. The proposal will require a large parking structure to be constructed on-site. 13c. The proposal will generate increased demand on existing public and private transportation systems . The project will be constructed in the air-space over a public transportation center, however. 13f . Increased vehicular traffic may pose a hazard to pedestrians and bicyclists in the area. i i 14a-f. The proposed project may require additional governmental services. 16a-e . The proposed project may require alterations in some utility systems. 18 . The site is presently undeveloped . The proposal is for a multi-story office building which will need to be deshgned in an aesthetically pleasing manner . 21c. The cumulative effect of relatively small impacts on various resources will be examined . ( 6962d) - 2 - it CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF DEVE7_OPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION(�141 S36-5241 PLANNING DIVISION (714) 536-SZ71 !arch 7 , 1986 Office of the Governor Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 10th Street , Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 Attention : Glen Stober SUBJECT: [notice of Preparation - General Plan Amendment No . 86-1 Gentlemen: The applicant for a proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Element as delineated on t:.e attached map has requested that the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Development Services initiate the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the project . The City of Huntington Peach will be the lead agency for the project and will prepare the EIR. The amendment consists of the following: A request to change the Land Use designation on 65 + acres of property located north of Warner Avenue , south of Heil Avenue , between Bolsa Chica and Graham Streets from Low Density Residential to Planned Community. The proposed land uses under the Planned Community designation are as follows : Medium Density Residential 30 Acres ( 4r-0 Units ) Medium High Density Residential 15 Acres ( 375 Units ) Senior Residential 5 Acres ( 250 Units Commercial 15 acres ( 150 ,000 square feet ) 65 Acres The above land uses will be analyzed as Alternative 1 . The following alternatives will also be analyzed : Alt . 2 Private Small-Plane Airport ( Existing Use) Notice of Preparation General Plan Amendment No . 86-1 Page Two Alt . 3 Low Density Residential 55 Acres ( 357 Units ) Mobile Home 10 Acres ( 90 Units ) 65 Acres Alt. 4 Low Density Residential 35 Acres ( 227 Units ) Medium Density Residential 20 Acres ( 300 Units ) Commercial 10 acres ( 100 ,000 square feet ) 65 Acres Alt . 5 Medium Density Residential 50 Acres ( 750 Units ) Commercial 15 Acres ( 150 ,000 square feet ) 65 acres In order for your concerns to be incorporated into the draft EIR, we will need your views as to the scope and content of the environmental information relevant to the project . Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date, but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice . It you have any questions retarding this matter , please do not hesitate to contact our office . ' Sincerely, Z Hal Simmons Associate Planner HS: kla ( 4381d ) ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Area 1 Map 2 . Environmental Checklist Form SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 21-5-II CITY OF HUN TINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP EDINGER AVE Jll 1 0 . i Iy� 1 N _• JR +ENRICJ]EN �R 1; 7= — •LORE' CF-E -_ - ----- - ---- - 1'3304 7R -� I ,REIN 3EO D _ C D CF-E m --- C J VEADOWLIRR )A ,VE=:: +CNTIIRI JR = 8 l a _. _AL t%T[ DR y1ODLECDEr 7I I 1 KJL AVE j I I A l —+T�l — I ` - :'Y=�.• V...0 :-is--•i.l e ID u - rr. WARNER AVE �.. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-1 APPENDIX I ENVIROtv11AENTAL O-ECKU T FORMA (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) t. Background I. Name of Proponent City of Huntington Beach 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92643 (714) 536-5271 3. Dote of Checklist Submitted March 7 , 1986 4. Agency Requiring Checklist ri t-4 of Alin►-; zTron Reach 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable General Plan amendment No. 86-1 11. Environmental Impacts (Explcnations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Yes No I. Earth, Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? x c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? K 11S Yes No g. Emosur- of peoole or property to geolo- gic hazards such as earthquakes, Icridslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazar:+s? X 2. Air. Wili the proposal result in: I. Substantial air emissions or d:,terioration of ambient air quality? { b. The creation of objectionab;e odors? _X C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, X either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of di- rection of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainoge pat- terns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X _ d. Change in the amount of surface weter in any water body? X e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in- cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of on X aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supp lies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water re- loted hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? X 116 Yes Maw No 4. Plant Life_ Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the c;-,eersity of species, or number of orgy species of plants (including trees, shrubs, gross, crops, and aquatic plants)' X b. R-�ductian of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)' •{ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endcngered species of animals? X c. Introduction of new species of animals into an crea, or result in a barrier to the ' migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife hcbitat? X 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a sub- stantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X • 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X 117 Yes b. SLbstantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? { 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involves a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or rodiction) in the event of an accident or upset condi t ions? Y b. Possible interference with on emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Y II. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing hous- ing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X c. Substantial impact upon existing transpor- tation systems? X _ d. Alterations to resent p patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? .t e. Alterations to waterborne, roil or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? X _ C. Schools? X_ 118 i Yes No d. Parics or other recreational facilities.? X P. Maintenance of public facilities, inciui:inq rocxts? X f. Other governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal :esult in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X b. Substantial increase in demand upon exist- ing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X C. Water.? ;{ d. Sewer or septic torks? X e. Storm water drainage? X f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Fkxnan Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)*7 X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X 119 Yes 11rE_ ►Lae No b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X c- Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religlous or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wild- life population to drop below self sus- taining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to ochieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively con- siderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X 111. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency) 120 On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect —++ on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. —1 I find that although to'-e proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case _ because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. 1 find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect cn the environ- ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. x March 7 1986 +— Date iq ture For (Note: This is only a suggested farm. Public agencies are free to devise their own format for initial studies) 121 i EXPLANATION OF 'YES' AND -MAY3E4 ANSWERS la . Portions of the site may be composed of soils with high clay and/or peat and organic content and may therefo-,:- require excavation and replacement of soil . lb . Construction on the site may require compaction or displacement of soil . lc. Grading and landscaping may cause a change in ground surface relief features . le . During grading and construction there may be a temporary increase in wind and/or water erosion of soils on the site . lg . The Newport-Inglewood Earthquake Fault System passes through the City. 2a . Additional vehicular traffic associated with the proposed project may result in some deterioration of ambient air Quality. 3b . Construction may alter the flow of runoff from the site . 6a . Development of the site will generate human and vehicle noise . 7 . Development of the site will result in additional street lights . 8 . The site is presently planned for Low Density Residential . The proposal is for a mix of Medium, Medium-High and 'nigh Density Residential and General Commercial . 11 . The proposal may result in approximately 2 ,000 additional people residing in the area. 12 . The proposal will create additional housing. 13a . The proposal will generate vehicular traffic. 13c . The proposal will generate increased demand on existing public and private transportation systems . 13e . The proposal will result in the closure of Meadowlark Airport which presently operates on the site . 13f . Increased vehicular traffic may pose a hazard to pedestrians and bicyclists in the area . 14a-f . The proposed project may require additional governmental services. 16a-e . The proposed project may require alterations in some utility systems . 18 . The existing airport on the site is a largely 'open-space' type of use which will be eliminated by the proposed project . 1.) . Recreational flying opportunities provided by the existing airport on the site will be lost . 20a . A portion of the property is identified as Ora Site 368 and is presently undergoing scientific excavation . 20b . Proposal may have an adverse affect on Ora 368 as well as any potentially historic buildings associated with the airport . 21c. The cumulative effect of relatively small impacts on various resources will be examined . ( 4386d ) APPENDIX K COMMENTS AND RESPONSES AREA 2 . 1 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Gomrmr AIR RESOURCES BOARD 1102 O STREET d P.O. BOX 1815 SACRAMEh O, CA 95812 DE'.7 I,.:ri_ 14 , 1986 =; 0. 00YI J hunting, Bead-;, Cn g264� SCH No. 86031206 Hal Simmons City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Simmons : Your March 11, 1986, notice of preparation for the General Plan Amendment #86-1 Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) has been reviewed. We believe there may be significant air po_lution emissions from this project to develop 65 acres of commercial, medium and high density housing and senior residential housing ( 1 , 075 total housing units) . We recommend the DEIR include an air quality impact analysis of the various alternatives proposed and identify measures to mitigate the project ' s emissions to the maximum extent feasible . Enclosed are our Guidelines for Air Quality Impact Assessment which will assist you in the preparation of this analysis . In addition, we offer the following specific comments : 1. Air Quality Information The Huntington Beach project is located in the South Coast Air Basin which currently exceeds the state and/or national ambient air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (CO) , lead, total suspended particulates, particulate matter ( PM10) , and nitrogen dioxide (NO2 ) . 2. Transportation Analysis Preparation of a traffic and travel demand analysis is a key step in preparing an air quality analysis. Traffic analyses, in general, examine the direct impact of new land uses on the traffic capacity of the adjacent ~ Mr . Simmons -2- April 14 , 1986 streets by utilizing standard or site specific trip generation factors . Such analyses are important to project the direct traffic impact, and thus, the direct impact on air quality. however, they do not provide information on the various sources of travel demand. Knowledge of the source of travel demand is critical to the design of an effective mitigation program. For this reason, we suggest the DEIR include an analysis of the nature of the potential trips to and from the proposed development . That is, where are the trips going to, what times do they come and go, and what is the purpose of the trips? The following information would be useful : destination of trips : % within 5 miles, % within 10 miles, etc. purpose of trips : % home to work, lunchtime trips, sales/business, home to school, etc . time & type of trips : % peak hour trips are commute trips mode of trips : % transit % SOV, % rideshare, _% bicycle, % walk + With this data, an effective transportation systems management (TSM) strategy can be designed. For instance, if 40% of commute trips are less than 5 miles in length, it could make sense to develop measures to encourage bicycle commuting. If a large number of lunch-time trips are projected, lunch-time food and shopping uses might be included in the project design or a shuttle be provided to nearby shopping areas. 3. Mitigation of Air Pollution Emissions Transportation control measures (TCMs) are an important component of the Air Quality Management Plan for the South Coast Basin. Therefore, we recommend the DEIR incorporate appropriate TCMs as mitigation measures as part of a transportation systems management plan for this project. Our enclosed Guidelines include a list of potential measures applicable to the project. We recommend the TCMs be designed to fit specific project conditions and that potential emissions reductions be quantified. In addition, we suggest the DEIR include consideration of how the following measures could be implemented for this project : a. Rideshgring We recommend a commuter ridesharing service be made available for this project and the adjacent residential area to encourage ridesharing among future residents. Mr. Simmons -3- April 14 , 1986 b. Traffic Flow Improvements We suggest the DEIR consider such traffic flow improvements as signal timing, modifications of truck delivery routes and/or schedules, or restrictions of on-street parking for major arterials . We recommend these measures be considered for the congested streets such as Warner or Balsa Chica, which connect with the nearest freeways . C. Transit We suggest the City of Huntington and the Southern California Transit District analyze the potential transit demand from the new residents and how this demand will impact existing routes and the potential for new routes. We recommend the site design include right of way provisions for passenger loading and unloading zones, bus shelters, and park and ride areas . d. Pedestrian Access We recommend that the DEIR include an analysis of the current pedestrian activity. How would the proposed project encourage or discourage walking trips? In general, walking is encouraged in areas which have visual interest with short distances between interest points and which are safe, well lit, and used by other pedestrians. We suggest the DEIR include consideration of minimizing building setbacks from the street for shopping or restaurant uses, provision of sunny places to sit, and provision of safe and easy access for the drop off and pick up of carpool passengers . e. Bicycle Access We recommend that the DEIR include an analysis of the current bicycle access to the project site and bicycle circulation within the project area. Proposed changes to adjacent streets should also be reviewed for bicycle access and safety. Designated on-street bike lanes ( Class II ) which are clearly marked and striped will increase the use of bicycles as a travel mode. New developments such as the General Plan Amendment 86-1 also have an Mr. Simmons -4- April 14 , 1986 opportunity to provide separate ( Class I ) bikeways . Such bikeways should be designed to provide direct routes, preferably with some advantage over motor vehicles, so they will be used for utilitarian trips . The bikeways should be designed to withstand weather and provisions included for continued maintenance. In residential areas, chauffeur trips can be reduced if school-age children have access to safe biKewdys and bike lanes. We suggest that the TSM plan include bicycle-safety training for children and their parents to support safe bicycle-driving skills. We recommend that the TSM plan for the commercial uses include secure bicycle racks or storage facilities for visitors, and maps of local bicycle routes with suggestions which support bicycle travel . We suggest local bicycling organizations be contacted to provide useful suggestions for maximizing bicycle access. f . Child Care Facilities We recommend that the DEIR include consideration of the provision of neighborhood child care facilities to reduce the length and frequency of trips related to child care responsibilities . To insure the implementation of the TSM plan, we recommend that the DEIR include a schedule of who does what at various phases of project buildout, financial commitments by the developer, and a process for monitoring their implementation through annual reports to the City of Huntington Beach. If we can provide additional information or assistance, please contact Ms. Sydney Thornton of my staff at ( 916) 322-7109. Sincerely, Gary Agid, Chief Local Projects Support Branch Technical Support Division Enclosure cc : Glenn Stober, OPk Richard Spicer, SCAG Brian Ferris, SCAQMD Leo Bevon, SCR Transit District A11 %1T 0-��•q:�� COCTNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA j P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 '"•"" 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 962-2411 April 1, 1986 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: James W. Palin, Director Development Services Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 86-1 The Districts have conducted a preliminary investigation of the area included within General Plan Amendment No. 86-1 and finds that it has been master planned by the Sanitation Districts for low-density residental development u:,ing a flow coefficient of 1,550 gallons per day, per acre. Since it appears tha` some of the alternatives outlined in your letter represent a significant land use change which would in fact generate considerably more flow than has been planned for by the Districts, this office cannot adequately comment on the proposal . However, the staff believes that the system that will accommodate the flows from this pro- ject, as well as others recently approved, is overloaded and may not have available capacity. We therefore plan to have our Maintenance Division do some flow studies to accurately determine what capacity is available to accept the flow from this and other area projects. Once the flow monitoring studies are completed and the staff has had time to evaluate them, we will contact you to set up a convenient meeting time to discuss the results of the study and what alternatives might be available or need to be constructed to serve the projects. Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering TMO:HJB:lb HUNTiVGTON BEACH DEVELGPMENT SERVICES 4?p nA 1986 N.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 "TA'I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA dEiian P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9272P-8127 °' ..... 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 Z9 cOU� (714) 962-2411 �t August 8, 1986 City of Huntington Beach HUNTINGTON BEACH Department of Development Services DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Post Office Box 190 Huntington, Beach, CA 92648 AU P. 0. BcX 190 Attention: Diana Teran Bl ai sure •�: •., �:i Qy�:" Ca 91r'I3 Assistant Planner Subject: Development of Meadowlark Airport Site in the City of Huntington Beach County Sanitation District No. 11 I have reviewed the developer's report prepared by RMG Engineering, Inc. transmitted to us with your August 5, 1986 letter. The development plan put forth in the report appears to be responsive to the capacity problems that the District faces, and we concur with the detailed calculations included in the report. The District does have plans to increase the disposal capabilities from the northly portions of District No. 11, and is actively pursuing the construc- tion and completion of the Coast Trunk Sewer system which will solve the problems. It is the opinion of the undersigned that development delays at the Meadowlark site are the best way to avoid overloading District's Slater Pump Station. It may well be that by the time the first phases of development are in place, the capacity problems posed by the existing Slater Pump Station may well be on the road to being solved. Accordingly, District's staff would have no objection to development levels which would generate sewage equal to that shown in District 's earlier planning reports. The District will not comment on the use of on- or off-site holding tanks to make up the difference between the level of development under the District's plan and that proposed by the land owner. The District will not own or operate ` such tanks. Thank you for the opportunity to review this report. If I can be of any service answering questions, please do not hesitate to call . / 4omas . Dawes Director of Engineering TMD:ja cc: RMG Engineering, Inc. Newland House Museum 19820 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach,California 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY June 14, 1986 Planning_ Division City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Diana Blaisure Meadowlark Airport is a unique entity within the modern city of Huntington Beach. Not only does the property contain a recognized archeological site, but it is the last general aviation airport of its vintage in coastal Orange County. Because the airport was not established until the mid-1940's, the aggregation of buildinqs may not qualify at this time for consideration as a historical landmark. However, the society believes it is significant to aviation history in Huntington Beach and in Orange County because it has retained the original buildings and has been in continuous operation for nearly forty years. We recommend that it be fully documented by city staff as part of the.preparation of the EIR for the proposed project. Members of the historical society have inspected the site and would be happy to assist staff in any documentation effort. Thank you for the oportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely yours, �r l A. ec'C c.., for. sec. HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT March 31, 1986 HUNTING I CAN B=ACH Mr. James W. Palin CEVELOP[AENT SERVICES Director of Development Services City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 f=.0. 6ox 190 ATTENTION: MS. LISA CERAN Huntington Bea;h, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Palin: SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-1 We have reviewed this proposed project and have the following comments I regarding transit services in the project area: • OCTD currently offers transit service on Warner Avenue adjacent to i the project site, and on Bolsa Chica Street and Heil Avenue approximately one-quarter mile from the project site as shown on the attached route maps and schedules. The alternative land uses being considered in this GPA will not result in any negative impacts on the existing or any potential future service in the project area. • In order to ensure accessibility to the available transit services under any land use alternative, we are requesting that the project i include consideration of pedestrian accessways from the interior of the project site to the existing bus stops on the area streets, as shown on the attached table. These accessways should be paved, lighted and handicapped accessible. We appreciate the opportunity to provide input for the development of this GPA. If you have any questions, or require further information, please call me or Sina Zarifi at (714) 971-6549. Sincerely, I fine fkxod - 6�PW(u- Christine Huard-Spencer Environmental Coordinator CHS:SZNN Attachments Route maps and schedules for OCTD routes 70 and 72 Existing OCTD bus stops in GPA 86-1 project area I 11222 ACACIA PARKWAY•P 0 BOX 3005 • GARDEN GROVE. CALIFORNIA 92642 (71t1 971-6200 t 1 i EXISTING OCTD BUS STOPS ADJACENT TO GPA 86-1 HUNTINGTON BEACH WB Warner Avenue/FS Graham Lane WB Warner Avenue/FS Bolsa Chica EB Heil Avenue/ OPP Waterway Circle NB Bolsa Chica Street/FS Heil Avenue WB,EB,NB: Direction of travel on arterial - westbound, eastbound and northbound. FS,OPP: Location of bus stop relative to intersection between arterial and cross street - farside of intersection, or opposite "T" intersection. '%14 VISPOS-14 o co ;Z P.O. BOX 1 026 • HUNTINGTON BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92647 r.- PHONE (71 4) 847-3581 March 24 , 1986 James W. Palin, Director Development Services City of Huntington Beach P.O.Box 190 Building Division Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Subject : General Plan Amendment No. 86-1 Dear Mr. Palin: Rainbow Disposal Company Inc. will be able to provide rubbish service for the Medium Density Residential , the Medium High Density Residential , the Senior Residential and the Commercial , as stated in your letter dated March 20 , 1986 . At this time we do not see any problem assocated with servicing the proposed land uses. Should you have any further questions, or we can be of any help to you, please feel free to contact my office. Sincerely, Stanley F. Tkaczyk H UNTINGTON BEACH Vice President DEVELICPMEVT SERVICES SFT/ew MAR 2 6 1986 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Southern California Edison Company P O BOX 2069 7333 BOLSA AVENUE WE,TMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92683-1269 March 25 , 1986 1 r SERVICES City of Huntington Beach P.O. g0X 190 P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attebtion : James W. Palin , Director Development Services Subject : E. I . R. - General Plan Amendment No . 86-1 Gentlemen: This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company and that the electric loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth which Edison is planning to meet in this area . Unless the demand for electrical generating capacity exceeds our estimates , and provided that there are no unexpected out- ages to major sources of electrical supply, we expect to meet our electrical requirements for the next several years . Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually ; however , excluding any unforeseen problems , our plans for new generation resources indicate that our ability to serve new loads during peak demand periods will be adequate during the decade of the ' 80s . Current conservation efforts on the part of Edison' s customers have resulted in energy savings . Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal . Very truly yours , Barbara Hause Service Planner BAH : da DISTRICT OFFICE SERVING- CORONA DEL MAR•COSTA MESA 8 FOUNTAIN VALLEY■HUNTINGTON BEACH MIDWAY CITY 8 NEWPORT BEACH 0 ROSSMOOR 8 SEAL BEACH 8 SUNSET BEACH 8 WESTMINSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA gGS COMPANY ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION . P. O- BOX 3334. ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA 92803-3334 March 25, 1986 HlJ,N i�%,'u.G� BEACH City of Huntington Beach DEVELCPMENT SERVICES Dept. cf Dev. Services P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r-!PI,R ~ ' 19E6 Attn: James W. Palin P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 86-1 This letter is not to be interpreted as a contractual commitment to s_rve tree proposed project, but only as an information service. Its intent is to notify you that the Southern California Gas Canpany has facilities, in the area where the above-named project is proposed. Gas service to the project could be served by an existing main as shown on tree attached atlas sheet without any significant impact on the environment. The service would be in accordance with the Ccnpany's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Camu.ssion at the time contractual arrangements are ►jade. The availability of natural gas service, as set forth in this letter, is based upon present conditions of gas supply and regulatory policies. As a public utility, the Southern California Gas Company is under the jurisdiction of the federal regulatory agencies. Should these agencies take any action which affects gas supply or the condition under which service is available, gas service will be provided in accordance with revised conditions. Residential (System Area Average) Yearly Single-family 1095 therms/year/dwelling unit Multi-family 4 or less units 640 therms/year/dwelling unit Multi-family 5 or less units 580 therms/year/dwelling unit These estimates are based on gas consunption in residential units served by Southern California Gas Company during 1975 and it should not be implied that any particular hone, apartment or tract of homes will use these amounts of energy. This is particularly true due to the State's new insulation requirements and consumers' efforts toward energy conservation. i Estimates of gas usage for non-residential projects are developed on an individual basis and are obtained from a Market Services Staff representative by calling (714)634-3173. We have developed several programs which are available, upon request, to provide assistance in selecting the most effective application of energy conservation techniques for a particular project. If you desire further information on any of our energy programs, please contact this office for assistance. I Sincerely, L. F. Hurlbutt Technical Supervisor LA/du attachment Scott Simmons 3301 South Bear Street #36-F Santa Ana, CA 92704 Miss Charleen Covina SCAG 16402 Bayshore Lane 600 S. Commonwealth Ave. Huntington Beach, CA Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90005 ATTN: Richard Spicer Craig Mandeville E.T.I. CORRAL 100 4751 Hermanson Circle Bonnie Wakeham Huntington Beach, CA 92649 20031 Big Beand Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Richard Harlow Building Industry Assn. 111 loth Street 2001 E. 4th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Santa Ana, CA Dick Nerio Huntington Beach Co. Bolsa Realty 2110 Main Street 9340 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Westminster, CA 92683 H.B. Chamber of Commerce H.B. Historical Society 2213 Main Street #22 c/o Newland House Museum Huntington Beach, CA 92648 19820 Beach Blvd. ATTN• Rim Barone Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ATTN: Teresa Reynolds HB/FV Board of Realtors Council on Aging 8101 Slater Avenue 1706 Orange Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ATTN: Judith Severy Amigos de Bolsa Chica Mobile Home Owners League 15545 Computer Lane 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA Garden Grove, CA 92642 ATTN: Virginia Day Friends of Hunt. Wetlands 9122 Christine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Coastal Conservancy P. O. Box 66494 Los Angeles, CA 90066 ATTN: Ruth Galanter V II71r11..p1:jJ11/ WO)�.:Lw...+a la 1,►. 'v J r•/• l4 . rP'T� 4C68J10l//M CTL O0Olt61 03-11-86 1OS01 PM 1983-66 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST /ACt 667' ' •'�f.:4J.t.'"f.::i'�:�lsM�"..,,�I�i{;i,'$;i� Y�" �:�;� '�`.` t� .1. .,... .�.':� � , ,.t I.,• ,1•.^�{'�:i.f"t,., '�4:...c ..•�p.' i13.4n�ap. �.1 r. y DISTRICT NUMBERS 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY'•^'j�''��'"''•� '' — �� 6 N1" t�l)'N; PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 146-041-08 KULLr GENE H / 146-041-15 CASDORPM# KEITH 146-041-Y2 MERCHANT# OAVIO L 04-007 16351 SANTA ANITA LN (/ 04-007 16402 GOLDEN GATE LN 04-007 16322 GOLDEN GATE LN HUNTINGTN BC", CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA v 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . 46-042-09 DORROUGH, BILLY J / 146-041-16 ELLIS, MARY A 146-041-23 LEIPZIG, 'GEORGE VICTOR . ._. 04-007 12631 SANTA ANITA LN U 04-007 16382 GOLDEN GATE LN / 04-007 16312 GOLDEN GATE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL ✓ 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-042-10 PATTERSON* EARL WILLIAM f 146-041-17 VANGELL, RONALD M 146-041-24 MERKS, CORNELIA A 04-007 2NO 04-007 16372 GOLDEN GATE LN ✓ 04-007 16302 GOLDEN GATE LN 16371 SANTA ANITA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-041-11 STEINHAUSr CAROLE Y V 146-041-18 TERAMURA, ROBERT J 146-041-25 GIULIANO. RONALD JAMESV 04-007 16381 SANTA ANITA LN 04-007 16362 GOLDEN GATE LN 04-007 16292 GOLDEN GATE LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 ..,,il,•_rw..n+/:taJw.:•r.mly JYa�re.frwana uN,�yd,p: 146-041-12 RASH, ROBERT v 146-041-19 WORKMAN, ALAN D �2�A-0 1-26 RATE ILLY![OYQa11�C31A! 04-007 16401 SANTA ANITA LN 04-007 16352 GOLDEN GATE LN �'it 04-0 7. ,.l<!a! ROLDSW iAT!'",i-ram HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 '.'� "UNTINGTOI4 BE Ho;tC1i' +"j,`.9t649 146-041-13 CATT, RONALD R 146-041-20 PEOERSENP THEODORE A v 04-007 6001 EDINGER AVE 04-007 16342 GOLDEN GATE LN BA+BQ! ,•• lj�ti• - HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 T. M TINQTNt C'jC'•' M92641 all 146-041-14 JOHANN, ANTON 146-041-21 KNESS, MELBA J 04-007 16412 GOLDEN GATE LN 04-007 WALSH# MELBA J YYY �.',°' 04-007 !91 GO EN GATE LN t'^;. s•�t.� HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 560 JACK PINE OR ;�`' MUNTINGTO EACH, CA '92649 ,t GRANTS PASS, OR 97526 1r4j ,,�.y� ��tiS110f9•�1311�@isLlif�-�:11t�Ts1+17i4{y�,y�y,l,, ir` 1 i ( hC4lJ302/PM CTL 000SE&O 00-91-46 10101 PM 19AS-86 CITT/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 666 t OZlTRICT NUMBER: 064A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 146-023-10 MITCHELL, CHRISTOPHER 146-025-17 BUONO, ROBERT A 1, ,I44-Q41'O1 80663, WALTER 04-007 511E SISSON ST 04-007 5I92 SISSON DR y;.'+e,"04-007 ;16282 SAITA ANITA LN - -•*'. HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 fi:" y;;'T'," ;;:i.LrHUNT2NYTQlI BEACH, ,CA ,', 1i64!''• 146-025-11 YORTT, LARRY R 146-025-18 MEYER, D CHRISTOPHER * i244,,.G,4r-0' '� IaOt� ►I!► NICOLAU` V 04-007 512E SISSON OR 04-007 5212 SISSON DR ,• y�0l�+0 6ti►1 �ilit ANIYA"L�� 1j,�RMe.n ir Y HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92644 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA ""'9t�649, ��..ypr 1Jr:.�fw igo + eAtNrIt $ p=¢ ZN 33 146-025-12 GLAVAS, TOM A 146-025 19 ENGUM, DOUGLAS B 04-007 513E SISSON AVE 04-007 17101 WESTPORT OR 10 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 ' 1 246-025-13 CLIFFORD, GREGORY 146-025-20 TAGGART# JUNE L '�1 •~ t'¢, R f A,� y/ 04-007 514E SISSON ST 04-007 5232 SISSON OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92647 1 146-025-14 RAMOS, SARA 146-031-06 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �an' ito- 04-007 3162 SISSON DR 04-007 CITY HALL p mw tr. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH► CAL 92648 W1•b � F� k � 146-025-IS DOMASZEWICZ, ALEX 146-031-09 HUBBELL FAMILY NR � .. � 04-007 32 8AL80A COVES O4-007 PARTNERSHIP 0 �3x.L, , /tHiTAot, NEWPORT BEACHi CA 92663 1161 BRYANT RD M�Jq iT1� TOHOAE'ACH•i CAm LOtIG BEACH, CA 90815 146-02S-16 KEDNEY, RAYMOND THOMAS 1 3 1 �� 6t.. t!lC1 1qq6, o4i-p� �fR�,T, ' Nr,R.QKALo, 04-007 518E SISSON DR040 7: .1 P t1 �#� 1� 0 0.4-OOy. IFi34 SXNTA•A!{Y, „_.i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 •t'�''u } •�fi'6 �L .}} �� *r 11UNT 6T�1��11E•ACK►j.,{.•Kji., :6$1 . 90815 ;.r.A��,.l►d,�.. •: e•_. + vW► � ,�.1ai�sn•r ti .tr 'd 'i �:. u• rl'r.:r..:V4.rt;�� t r�n^t,-r...- ;�..r.• tz' a,,ryy ;p.., .�y►i rr••ST`t is q r � {fiilrl'�HUMB[R: 0-4 A HUH71MG7014 BEACH CITY i FAI2CEl NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OW11ER4 ZIP ; TPA NAME AND .ADORESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CUD "• 163-292-15 CANADA, VERNON L 163-292-22 HOCHSCHILD, ARTHUR A 3RO 263-292-29 REED, CLIF7011 W '04-007 17202 LYNN ST 04-007 4841 CURTIS CZR 04-007 4782 CURTIS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUN71NGTCN BEACH, CA, 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 ' 163-292-16 OVIATT, JOEL P 163-292-23 VARON, STANLEY 163-292-30 LESCH, PHYLLIS• 04-007 4812 HERMANSEN CIR 04-007 4831 CURTIS CIR 04-007 17212 LYNN ST +' • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 VI': 163-292-17 WILLIAMS, VERNE E 163-292-24 RUEBSAMEN, DALE G 163-292-31 STRACHAN, SHIRLEY M 04-007 4832 HERMANSON CIR 04-007 4811 CURTIS CIR 04-007 17222 LYNN ST ` HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 µ" 163-292-18 SAYLOR, JERRY R 163-292-25 MARCHAND* LEO D 163-292-32 POLENTZ, ROBERT EDWARD 04-007 17161 GREEN ST 04-007 4801 CURTIS CIR 04-007 4792 CURTIS CIR 1! , 1•r HUNTINGTON BEACH, iCA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 163-292-19 ALETO, THOMAS J 163-292-26 0000, BARBARA M 263-292-33 NATION, JEWELL D ' ; r 04-007 17181 GREEN ST 04-007 4791 CURTIS CIR 04-007 4802 CURTIS CIR HUHTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 icy ' ' � , • •. �1 163-292-20 CALDEIRA, JEANETTE C 263-292-27 LAHTI, ROY , 163-292-34 LANDA, DANIEL WILLIAM 2. 04-007. 4861 CURTIS CIR 04-007 17192 LYNN ST 04-007 5235 VISTA MONTANA �} HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 YORBA LINDA, CA 9268 163-292-21 BATDORF, LEWIS E 163-292-28 CANADA, VERNON L' 163-292-35 SCHUESLER, MARY'M �1 04-007 48S1 CURTIS CIR 04-007 17202 LYNN ST 04-007 4832 CURTIS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649' •, HUNTINGTON BEACH, 'CA 926 7K!� �fhA;'R:'a,�••^,+..'•!. .t•. . rvr'•^-� ,,n� "11 tl'"•S d• , 31t 1T14`�! Fli. �: t-r.y..��-�," y' ".;ft�•,•-•••!yt•11•YL'. � � .. tl• `�N11r'FdIr1MA0F�1 7'�.�'.`. Z IS ' ., .. II : •r 'i t` r 'I' ., !,r.. ' � �r fir' '1(:•' :��T.► .I ,,, 'r,. 1 ,�1'. t • 1 r � !:�,� r III r,' 1r ,7 1 At .'.�,.,"t �' '�1l.7• ,,... �• r? ,� x,' ,•fir,. �' •�•rsv"-tea.+..,.., ►�....w•.w.rti.r• . .. �.F .. 4;S[;ICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ' 1 PAR CE,L.;NO/•'r' ' ew'g OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP r PARCEL NO/~:;a�,u .,...-•-OWNERS..•,.• r^*:. r;�!!�I�P�"'' TRA' NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COO ; w.;163-291-61 ROSE, ROBERT J 163-292-01 JENSEN, MARVIN + 163-292-08 MARESH, JERRY C a(� , 04-007 512 KINGLET CT 04-007 1300 5 LOS ROBLES AVE 04-007 4781 HERMANSON CIR J GREAT FALLS. MT 59404 PASADENA, CA 91106 HUNTINSYDN BEACH, CA 92649 163-291-62 YANG, JEFFERSON YUAN 263-292-02 OE SPAIN, ROBERT A 163-292-09 MAMMEN, TERRY k,f 04-007 SHENG 04-007 17151 GREEN ST 04-007 234 E 17TH ST 8117 . 7217 E DAPPLE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 COSTA MESA, CA 92627 ORANGE, CA 92669 163-291-63 KO, ROBERT F 163-292-03 SANDERS, B RHEA'" ' I ` 163-292-10 MANDEVILLE, CRAIG' p:t 04-007 15353 METROPOL DR 04-007 4842 HERMANSON CIR 04-007 4751 HERMANSEN CIR , „;. ,. HACIENDA HEIGHTS,;.CA 91745 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 163-29144 MARESH, JERRY C 263-292-04 PATEL, KIRIT 0 ; 163-292-21 CASSAR,' GIUSEPPE M.;ET AL f 04-007 „ 4772 JAMES CIR APT 0 04-007 4831 HERMANSON CIR 04-007 4752 HERMANSEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH'.!CA 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ' I HUNTINGTON BEACH,: CA 926 ;j . If '163-291-65 MARESH► JERRY 'C •.I; 163-2.92-OS PICCHI, KEVIN ;� 1 163-292-12 MAJIDIAN, AMIR A ;i 04-007 4772 JAMES CIR 10, 04-007 4811 HERMANSON CIR 'i''' 4',I. ,04=007 4762 HERMANSON CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH v. CA ; : 9264 163-991-66 MARESH, JERRY C 263-292-06 MROFKA, ALBERT S 163-242-13 SCNULZ. OTTO H 04-007• 4772 JAMES CIR 101 04—i007 4801 HERMANSEN CIR 04-007;c 4782 HERMANSON CIR + HUNTINGTON BEACH,; CA 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649. HUNTINGTON BEACH,. CA 92649 •263-291-67 ,LE VINE►. RICHARD B 163-292-07 PANARO, ALBERT 163-292-14 WRIDE, EVAN L � 04-007• 801 TUSTIN AVE SUITE 607 04-007 24961 PA5EO ARBOLEDA 04-007 4792 HERMANSON CIR SANTA ANA, CA 92705' EL TORO, CA 92630 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9264 •i'I�M + ,� . :)•"I. � )rA: a' ,r.,..,.,.-.,•r.'r,- ) :P.rrq,"7j..''agi.••.., rr •n�ft;t ' ;,I+ -•',it'+1 i'KyT�' .I"h.:,r�r� t� .,,,;I e.. '4i�,'!'y,».a-,o••tt.•-a...»ne.a•,ryR.�ft!;tplo ttl'�' .., ,• .. '' ..,, ,,,�.:•.-,,,:I�w•+1.•.• -�•-,•.,n•«.r,.1„t.•rl,c•,d,gT � ,,,.,�.,p,n•,-...1. .., •yw Al 01SIkICT NUMBER 054A HUNTINGION BEACH CITY, 1 PARCEL 110/ OWNER9 ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWIIERS 1113 f ' IRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE IRA NAME AND ADDRESS , CODE IRA NAME A140 ADDRESS CODE 163-282-12 GLORE, BILL F 163-291-37 PHILLIPS, ARTHUR W 163-291-54 LI, TIT SANG ! }� 04-007 4912 SEARIDGE CIR 04-007 14 CRAGMONT AV • 04-007 15632 DAWS014 L11 HUNTINGTON BEACH; 'CA 92649 SAN FRANCISCO 16 CAL 94116 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 I 163-282-13 BRUINSMA, PAUL J 163-291-48 PHARRIS GROUP 163-291—SS SHENG, WEI—EN { 04-007 4902 SEA RIDGE CIR 04-607 SUITE 200 04-007 16402 6ENTRY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 2854 E •SANTIAGO BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA .92447 ORANGE, CA 92667 { 163-282-14 BARTOLI, JOSEPH A 163-291-49 PHARRIS GROUP 163-291-56 KORULA, JACOB 04—007 ,'4896 SEA RIDGE CIR 04-007 SUITE 200 04-007 7.SAMPATH, S bra' HUNTINGTON BEACH,. CA 92648 . 2854 E SANTIAGO BLVD 5341 MARVIEW OR ORANGE, CA 92667 LA PALMA, CA 90623 a 4 ! a ). 163-282-15 BARTOLI, ANTHONY 163-291-50 LI, TIT SANG 163-291-57 WHEELER, DOUGLAS W f �jrl? 04-007 , 4441 LOS PATOS AVE 04—j007 15632 DAWSON LN 04-007 19821 QUIET SURFS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 'I 163-282-16 CHOI, PATRICIA 163-291-51 LI, TIT SANG 163-291-58 LI, TIT SANG 04-007 4886 SEARIDGE CIR 04-007 IS632 DAWSON LN 04-007 15632 DAWSON LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 j HUNTING70N BEACH, CA 92647 a � , 163-282-17 SEA RIDGE HOMEOWNERS' 163-291-52 CHEN, THOMAS' 163-291-59 LI, TIT SANG 04-007 ASSN 04-007 12804 QUEENSBOROUGH ST 04-007 IS632 DAWSON LN 2 %PROFESSIONAL MGNT l CERRITOS, CA 1 90701 HUNTIN6TON BEACH, CA 92647 . 7400 CENTER AVE SUITE 205 � MUNTING70H BEACH, CA 92647 163-291-02 SCHUESLER, JOHN. 163-291-53 LI, TIT SANG 163-191-60 HSU, MON SOIL 04-007 4832 CURTIS CIR 04-007 15632 DAWSON LN 04-007 11313 E RIDGEGATE DR 1, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 WHITTIER, CA 90601 .. �wr,•• ''�"t+'M1 ) '�•' ,.ail. p„ ,:��..., tth*'^h LiL M�.:,'wnlCgy�►+f`M„•., h'fr< 1!!lt+e"'.:'N''� R�lpft • •,' 1.�' •' •' '• ' , + . ., , + 'I f .' , ' .I,` ,�. .. �'. ' 1, I , ). � I. . . !•�'. lj ( ' +��'11 I •r,1, t ;1:� !•�^1 'v ,l..�jr'•' , �'��;�1.i'tiA A.1;, Iia lrl:Vq,..I' , .• Ir I ' I I i .,, . - .., - Ow$TRSCT HUMBER1 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY I 1. �:PA�tC[L HO/• •�. OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL'NO/ OWNERS ZIP +s�TRA •.'' 1 i`v1 NAME AND ADDRESS, CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 163-Y81-2E HUNTLEY, THOMAS E 163-281-29 GREGORY. WILLIAM 3 3RD 163-282-05 ALDINGER, CHRISTIAN L °'•04-007 488Y SEAPINE CIR " 04-007 4961 LOS PATOS AVE 04-007 4911 SEA RIDGE CIR ,4': 'HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ••r. 1 .'163-281-23 GOTO, EUGENE S ' 16.3-281-30 KOLA DEVELOPMENT CORP 163-282-06 NUNN, DARLA SUE " .'04-007 '' 4861 LOS PATOS AVE 04-007, 8072 ADAMS AVE 04-007 4915 SEARIDGE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 163-281-24 RADLE, JOHN K 163-281-31 RUBIN, BERNARO 163-282-07 BASSETT, DOU6LA3 E '. 04-007. 4901 LOS PATOS AVE 04-007 4981 LOS PATOS AVE 04-007 4921 SEA RIDGE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 1 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i Sa o 163�281-25 MAHSFIELD, C STEPHFN 04 n163ylBE�-D1'"VNO, N�1NCY T ' • 163-282-06 MC DANIEL, DUANE 04-007„ 4911 LOS PATIOS AVE 04-00,7 4885 SEA RIDGE CIR 04-007 4925 SEARIDGE CIR � . �.` !• HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,� CA 92649; ' , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 163-281-16 GALLAGHER* THOMAS B 163-282-02 NASH, BERNARD J 163-28Y-09 JENSEN, MARSHALL "04-007,; 4921 LOS PATOS AVE .04-007 4691 SEA RIDGE CIR 1' '. 04-007, .4926 SEA RIDGE CIR HUNTINGTON, BEACH, ,CA 92648 I HUNTINGTON BEACH,, CA; 42648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA; 92649;.t:;� r"��,II. ' .. .I I 't '' I r. .1,, i r'; t�� F,�li', I 1' •I' �'�'(??`"'.i!i ti163-Y81-27'VERGEL DE DIOS, CECILIO 163-282-03 THURKINS, KATHLEEN P' +� 163-282-30 REED, CNARLES W ` 4931 LOS PATOS AVE, 04-007 469S SEA RIDGE CIR 04-007 '• 499E SEA RI DGE CIR ' ''IS*•'%." HUNTINGTON BEACH•,CA 92649 HUNTINGTOH BEACH, CA 9E649 HUNTINGTON„BEACH, CA'. 9E6491a.,r '`'r f , tr• 1 1� , 1 r',163-281-28':WIEDEMANN� LESLIE; A 163-28Y-04 COATE, CHRIS S ? , 163-282-11 RONNEBERQ, LARRY L . : ' 04-007.' 16581 TROPEZ LN I 04-007 4901 SEA RIDGE CIR 04-007 4916 SEARIDGE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACN,I, CA 91649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9E6491' l r�� ,•t�'••',s'I ,v 1 i i;l i ,, I � I' 't' '`. it uw.•.",.wll.p wa ` r i44 4.w tn4NC PAML no. OWNERS OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TAAi'r'";� NAME AND ADDRESS C04f� +'T�rTIIA,..'.,•,��y, N� ,+Q�/�ADO.g�.SS.r.t+�n�+'COD 'TRA NAME AND.ADORISS-1 COD! ,•163+279-04 SIGNAL COMPANIES INC 163-Y81-08 GILPIN. DAVID 163-Y81-15 ROGA, HALTER {�,A 04-007 ;•SIQNAL LANDMARK INC 04-007 1722E GREEN 5T 04-007, 17682 RAINGLEN LN +• �,:,' , ; 17890 SKY PARK CIR ; HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA ' 92649 'IRVINE. CAL 92724 j I ,'• 163-E81-01 0t 11 C 163-281-09 TOLEDO, ROSARIO T 163-281-16 RAMAEKERS. EDWARO J 04-,007 04-007 17242 GREEN 5T 04-007 49SZ SEAPINE CIR j O'9; HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 , HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92646 !' ; 163-lal-OE 163-231-10 ELLIS, RONALD D ET AL 163-28I-17 60UIN, BENSON E 04-007-i ' * 04-007, 1725E GREEN ST 04-007 4942 SEAPINE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 �'.163-E81-03 dN J',�.� ,.1 163-281-11 LTON, LESLIE E ' 163-281-18 BARTO, MICHAEL A ' +.• ;.,; 04-007 �� 04-007 4881 SEAPINES CIR 04-007 493E SEAPINE CIR 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . 163-E81-04 ;' h ��{ONK 163-281-19 FERRALL, JOHN C 3RD 263-281-19 REED. MICHAEL F 04-007'1 M ��tloa ' �rA "E 04-007 4901 SEAPINE CIR 04-007 4922 SEAPINE CIR +��' .i �? HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTIH67ON BEACH, CA 92649 143=E81- �1�11 rr� ;h163-281-13 LUTZ. DIETRICH R 163-Y81-YO CALIFORNIA FEDERAL S a L 04-007 t OiI�VI� lP N OR 04-007 4911 SEAPINE CIR 04-007 ASSN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SUITE 300 ,• � �,pi,; 22022 SAN VICENTE BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 ' 1 trl��w•••.r��yl..�� rr•i.., nr rl•w� i ' 163-281-07 LAVERTY, ANNE F . 163-281-14 ELLIS, RONALD D 263-281-21 SENESE, DANTE M 04-007 . 1721E GREEN ST 04-007 2120 MAIN ST 9256 04-007 4902 SEAPINE CIR r. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUN71NGTOH BEACH, CA 92648' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 �r. ip ,M � I rl;.i .,•y,i�',� ;'I�p1 �. � �:y.. t�., : '� ): �. ,�.� l/� ' LA•''tJ��'L J,J �'nf.l� ` �.+4 f•3f '' `a`'i ,' y'' + .,' '' Y ,!•�,�,� ��.�' 111:1 fOtd. ++ '';�1 ''�'y ,�:'ij:l�.I'•Y. , Yi„ ._l.: i a � y r r EMT Lid b HUNTING ON bEACN .0 Yµ. J , '•� PARCEL NO/.. OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP A NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE, 5 ;163-223-14 AL-MUSSAWIR, FAROUK ./ 163-131-12 LARSON, ANN J 163-131-19 BISHOP, BYRON MERVI 04-007 56 BATTERY AVE VVV 04-007 5142 THORN TREE LN, 04-007 1 4781 PEARCE ST APT BROOKLTN, NY 11228 1 IRVINE, CAL 92715 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 • 163-123-15 SUN, CHUNC I 163-131-23 BUCCELLA, FRANKLIN J ''TR 163-132-20 BUCCELLA, FRANKLIN R 04-007 20330 HANSEL AVE 04-007 3541 COURTSIDE CIR 04-007 3S41 COURTSIDE CIR TORRANCE, CA 90503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 163-123-16 CROSMAN, ALEXANDER 263-231-24 ATERS, JANE C ET AL 163-132-22 SWANIGAN, HERBERT V 04-OA7 SUITE 300 04-007 17151 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR 04-007 17132 -A 3555 TORRANCE BLVO APT C HARBOR BLUFFS CIR ` TORRANCE, CA 90503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA. 92649 163-123-27 CROSMAN, ALEXANDER 263-131-IS BUCCELLA, FRANKLIN J T 263-131-22 CHAN, HILARY K H f, . 04-007 SUITE 300 04-007 3541 COURTSIDE CIR 04-007 9842 KINGS CANYON OR 3555 TORRANCE BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH', CA 9264 TORRANCE, CA 90503 • 163-223-16 RATSIU, EMIL 1 163-131-16 CHI, SHAO-MIN' ! ! R P R E �ir •. ,� 104-007 9150 DINSDALE ST ., 04-007 5172 DUNBAR DR 15 I DOWNEY, CA 90240 j HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA . 92649 163-123-19 BUFFINGTON,. JOSEPH P J 163-131-17 MC CRADY, NELSON H 263-231-26 CABO DEL MAR HOMEOWNERS 04-007 , 16892 CORAL CAT LN 04-007 P 0 BOX 2220 I I 04-007 . ASSN '.•- ;y.�^• HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SEAL BEACH, CAL,' 90740 "I. , .( Y.VILLAGE4INVE3TMENT8 ,,, I . r�►�' ;' 1176 MAIN ST' INE,.'gA„ 1•, I / 927�1. 163-131-11.'HAKACHI, TOMMY T 163-131-18 STEIN, HOWARD E i'�7 263-131-27 CABO DEL'MAR HOMEOWNERS 04-007;' 17901 SHAMLEY CIR " 04-007 51 HUNTINGTON CENTER 'i"' 04-00,7.1 „ ASSN " HUN7INGTON BEACH,I'CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 91647 ' '�,; „ •" ,: XVILLAGE'INVESTMENTS ' ��'! `t"•' v� k 2176 MAIN ST. IRVINE, "CA, 92714 ' 1� �' �. 7 i1 i ., .. I, , •� '., I;', .c•��e •,, I, ' F, I •1 Y' I ,I IrJ14 � . .. , i`'}i�`' 'i��„iv�`T!��i•�"I UrC�I�,�^�':fri�1 ;ACSt./J01//M,CTL 'OOOf70P Os-tl•�0 10'+01 IM (1700-10 C=T�/pIfTRICT OAUCt<. "LIfT;'i 4�)",:•,' ' K i I'''r �'. s: i'• r. b�, :'! ,� •• 1'•.;. '. + ,i. .. . ' ',I,:�.'�trh1 '' 1 `ia•' ''I' ,,�, .:+`+ li,t • DISTRICT �r•I , I I i 1 •, • •` i .lir,, ,+,. .,) ,' , `;�' ,•, '.'4,,.r '.;'�•e;ki.il .;• C;��t..l'� �' ' .,�-'� r - j OWNERS' ' ZIP PARCEL Cr�O/ `• " I ,OWNERS ' ' Z P,+' ;PARCEL`NO/ 9•''; OWNERf' � i'I ''�•''•ZIP ^+ TRA NAME• ANO ADDRESS COOS TRA NAME AND ADDRESS I OE, ", :'TRA' , NAME AHO ,AOORESS C00E 146-201-23 MINEARr JAMES P 146�201-32 NEFF* MARION GENE 146-t01.39;RICH* JERRY. A l; -04-007 "•'16705 GRAHAM ST' 04-007 3421 MEADOW CIR r' 04-007 545E MEADOW CIR NUNTINGTN BCHrICA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH., CA 92647' `•'' ;+ MUNTINGTON•BEACH* CA 9164 146•101-24 MINEAR. JAMES P 1467201-33 BRONSON* HARRY �i 146-201-401KUZU9 SAOETTIN . 11 '� j•:' 04-007� .,16705 GRAHAM ST 04-007 5411 MEADOW CIR 04-007 5462 MEADOW CIR I I .• HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA' ; 92649 " HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 I,"� ,i146-201-27 C100I0►- MART M 146=201-34 WHITE. WILLIAM B "i 146-201-41 DAILACIS. UL023 ' 04-007 5491 MEADOW CIR I 04-007 5401 MEADOW CIR 04-007 547E MEADOW CIR I. :. HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 9264 „�3,. .-146-201-26 MC CRACKEN. DOUGLAS EDWIN 146-201-3S DAVIS. PAUL E 146-201-42 WIGGINS# GREGORT JOHN 04-007 5471 MEADOW CIR 047007 5402 MEADOW CIR 04-007 5492 MEADOW CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 2649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH.'CA 92649 146-201-29 MIYAI. KENJI 146-201-36 KARD039 THOMAS 146-201-43 GAIEHNIE. FRANK W ::1�• ,.04-007 5461 MEADOW CIR:'• 04-007 P 0 BOX 127 04-007 16832 STONEHAVEN CIR iy. ! r',t 1if,•' ;, HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 SUNSET BEACH, CA 9074E HUNTINGTON BEACH., CA 92649 IE;*+ 46-201-30 PEOERSEH. STANLEY K 146-ZOI-37 HANNA. MAGOI R 146-201-44 ELLIS* JAMES T 04-007„ 5452 MEADOW CIR 04-007. 5422 MEADOW CIR 04-007 16822 STONEHAVEN CIR A. HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92647 ' HUNTINCTON BEACH. CA 92649 .�+ 146-201-31 KORMONOY. STEVEN A 246-201-38 FRANKEL. MARK L 246-201-45 SWATSEK. VICTOR 0 04-007 5431 MEADOW CIR , 04-007 5432 MEADOW CIR 04-007 1681E STONEHAVEN CIR 'ct •HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 9 649 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 _.' v _ l - �.era:a .�•_::ni.�ti:•. .,_ _ ..... ' .. �'''. 'r•'I ,+' I Iir1p."ram. t�T� --- .�,Hi . ' � 'II ''' 11 �18`,��,Il�at�Se �le�It;M 20• •� 'rr' "' , . !` .�,�7"7X11y'lh`' ''i ' '. I I ,, � •, +'+�4' '�I i I��1 I:' r��:' + �yr,{,�', ,11•' •' y;";+'t}i, OZITR CTyNUIIRdR�' Oi4At ;' HUNTINGTON BEACH CIT ". OWNERS ZIP RS.: NFRS r, ZTP. INA ' NAME AND ADDRESS C00! A lAD01lLAl1 A, NAME 'ANO ADORESB ;COOL. , '�,I• I ' ,. •'I� ' !, ,1•' ll f rpm, 146-271'-27' ODRIGUEZ, JONES A CO LTD 146-201-04 .WALTER# CLARENCE ++' ' . • 'I !1-t "146-l01=14''GRAHAM� CLAUO A :•+�:• ,,,;';; 04-007 204 ! RASTER,STE,.*1004-007 ;'16701 GRAHAM sTi .+'• �'04-007;, '.TMINCARs M IMr.,CA /,t 92801 HUNTINGTN BCH#, CAL ,./ 92449 t- 16705 GRAHAM $T ' •+' •"'� `I. !'' HUNTINGTON BEACH" I CA r ' "U. 146-lel�b8 146-201-06, RUNYARD,; ROBERT'0 �• ; 146-E01-16 ROSENBLATT, STANLEY� �+;'!� 04- 07 .04-007 5451 OLD; PIRATE' LH d { Oq-007 ..16707 GRAHAM ST .' ; HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL ^. 92649 ►+ HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 'F1!1-146-191 1H[ 146-LO1-b7 VINHr NORMAN E + 146-LO1-17 OERDERIANr HARRY 04-007 5441 OLO' PIRATE LN 04-007 540Z OLD PIRATE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ,. 'HUNTINGTON' BEACHr' CA 9144 �•,,T'146-191-0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 146-2101-08 ERASER, LEROY A / 146-201-18 PICARDr 'MARGARET -� 04-007' P-0-8 X' 190 + r 04-007 5432 OLD PIRATE L 04-007 54S2 OLD PIRATE LN q ,,,� 1,;• HUNTIN TH BCHr CAL 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACHrCAL 92649 . HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 9264 !•r. 146-L01-Ol CITY OF HU TINGTON BEACH 146-2,01-09 TINKLER, CHARLES M 246-202-20 YOUNGBL0009 BARBARA 8 r ,04-007. P 0 BOX' 190 04-007 S415 OLD PIRATE LN .04-007 5404 OLD PIRATE LN "+'HUNTINGTN BC CAL 92648 HUNTINGTH BCHr CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 9264 'fir 1' d r i J•,`.'tj-146-201-02 CIT OF HUNTINGTON EACH 146-101-10 HAUSENr ARTHUR C JR 146=201-21 MESSI8, CHARLES G ' i"1'l;�;• 104-007 P Q�BOX 190 04-007 5401 OLD PIRATE LN 04-007 5371 OLD PIRATE LN VVV •p'• , 1 HU�jTINGTH.BCH, CAL 92648 1 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 r w�WKi a'-0vnlrVVvfdr liazYl J146-201-03 'KORN, LAWRENCE / 146-2,01-11 HUFSTETLER, NANCY 146-201-22 RICK3, RALPH D 04-007 7BLAU, SONDRA ',I/ 04-007 5391 OLD PIRATE LN 04-007 5362 OLD PIRATE LN 49S2 WARNER AVE HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL' 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL 92649 t SUITE 10S ,.HUNTINGTON BEACHr; CA 92649 iAC6tJ301/PM CTL 10, 0l300 0l-21-66 10801 PM' 1985-86 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL L15T !, I I' . I , PAGE 706 ��' DISTRICT NUMBER,:. 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP '; ' PARCEL NO/ 1 1. 1 `OWNERS TRA NAME AND ADORES! CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS. CODE TRA ' NAME' AND ADDRESS COO! �. j,, r; 146-155-30' �' 146-161I35 TETREAULT, NORMAND A 246-161-41 ENDICOTT@ 'OTI4 RICHARD r•04-007 1� 04-007 6811• LAFAYETTE DR "��' '' 04-007 ° 6731i' LAFAYETTE OR •',,� I'' '� °Kr HUNTINGTN 8CHv •CAL 92647 t HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 r r I ,YI ' ' I, I,•3. '��:ht�o.1 f 4'�' .' ,.';✓,'rll !y",( '=� •r '�l^' 1.1' ,I it I , ,. 1 ' •' .. 1' , 4 '( '!, lj'( lH�r`� 146-I55-39 :� 146-161-36 STOKES, MAYNARD L, ��', 146-161-43 METCALF, -TIMOTHY E ' .I 0♦-007 04-007 6801 LAFAYETTE OR `•' 04-007: 6721 LAFAYETTE OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA'. . . ' 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA.. 92647 146-155-4 1 146-161I37 JOHNSTON, STATEN M 1 146-161-44 POWELL, JAMES A 04-007 ,1 04-COT 6791. LAFAYETTE. OR 04-007-,.., 6711 LAFAYETTE OR •�• F1i` F;','; HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 'I 92647; I HUNTINGTN BCH, -CAL .92'647 . lo 146-155-41 �,01� 146-161-38 MC MAHONr JOHN B 146-162-04 CHIUr CHAN6-HSIN 4, 04-007, f74��'}1 04-007 6781 LAFAYETTE OR 04-007 6832 LAFAYETTE OR `r 8,A •.,;9t6491'+ HUNTINGTON,BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACHP CA 92647 146-155-42 T 146-161-39 SAUER, DAVID E 146-162-OS SANFILIPPO, VINCENT J ;• 04.007 e 04-007 6761 LAFAYETTE OR ,04-007 6822 LAFAYETTE OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL , . 92647 146-161-33 KENNEOY, MARYLOU 146-161-40 CHOUDHURY, P ROY „ '146-162-06 SHMILOVICH, ARVIN ' 04-007, 6831 LAFAYETTE OR 04-007 . 67S1 LAFAYETTE OR 04-007 6812 LAFAYETTE OR ` 'r '' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA ' 92647 1 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92647 -4 HINSON ROGER K 1 46-162-07 SCHNEIDER, ERLANO 4 61 1 `6-161 34 •80NZALES, JOHN W 1 6 1 , , 14 , . 04-007 6821 LAFAYETTE DR 04-007 6741 LAFAYETTE DR , 04-007 -6502 LAFAYETTE OR ' ' 1'.• , ;:,' ." HUNTINGTN BCH, CALI: 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA .92646 ' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 i I ._ Q !,�1�''}��'R• .7)+!I{ '.Y+ 'IYr 11,1�♦1�.J,i j/lNI } r.;! 1�•rii.J, rA,' rl r Jl:�ii,.• 1} �r• iF `": J 'r ,J S,,b,ri / .'•F ,t • t:` ," •'1 . ��/IiW34F�Y,i{CAW' S'�•.'� I •:>jli•f . ` 1 •J �.�i.y'��•ti�.••ii,:l:�if7��'1JL.'::t1�-'f91t��q�i+1��1i�'t1i'�`Il'f A— f-TTV.-nTGrOTET FARCR L L2ST i'r ':i, '; I,•'OISTRICT NUMBERS 0544 �.�HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY' �*PARCEL .NO1 OWNERS , ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS „ ZIPI 'TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COOS `I .1r146-064-03, MC COY, MARVIN C 146-064-10 KEESEY, THEODORE D 146-071-0 DAVIS, 2ILOA ` j.�.04-607• 16101 BAYSHORE LN' / 04-007 -16371 BAYSHORE LN 04-007 16111 SCHRYER L "�,r,• ; HUNTINGTON B[ACH, !CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BE No' CA 92649 .i• 146-064-04 ROSERTSON, OENNISI ✓ 146-064—I1 CLARK, JAMES H JR J 146-071-05 ATTI, ANT ONY J '+ 104-007 16311 BAYSHORE LN 04-007 16381 BAYSHORE LH 04-007 6121 SCHR ER LN g.,.. HUNTINGTON BEACH,' CA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAL 92649 H HTINGTON BEACH,CAL 92649 246-064-05 CARLSON,..JEFFREY J 146-064-12 SEEDS, SANDRA V .146-071-06 BA Y, JA ES W . 04-007.. . 16321 BAYSHORE LN J 04-007 ' 16401 BAYSHORE LN 04-007 161 1 SC YER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUN NGT BCH, CAL 92649 146.-064-06 WATERS, WILMA 0 J 146-064-23 LEWISr GERALD R 146-071-07 FORTIN GARY R 04-007 •16331 BAYSHORE LN 04-007 16411 BAYSHORE LN 04-007 16141 RYER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTIN T N BEACHICAL 92649 146-064-07 FORTUHA, THOMAS V 1 246-071-01 VEAGUE, RICH 0 A 146-071-08 DOVE , JOH H ,;'• 04-007 16341 BAYSHORE LH 04-007 16081 SCHR R LN 04-007 1615 SCHR R_LN. HUNTINGTON BEACH, .CA 92649 HUNTINGTN CM, CAL 92649 HUN INGTOH EACH, CA 92649 146-064-08 WALL, CHRISTIAN PETER 146-071-02 EN LER,t�IMOTHY E 146-071-09 EY, WARRE ' D TR' 04-007 163S1 BAYSMORE LN 04-007 160 1 SCHRYER LN 04-007 498 N BOWLING GREEN WAY HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HU NG BCH. CA 92649 LOS ANGELES# A 90049 . ,. r is r � 246-064-09 KOJIMA, OSAMU J 146-071-03 KAISE , J DUES T 146-07 —10 LAWSON,_GEORG& W 00-007 16361 BAY3NORE LN 04-007 1610 SCHR R LN 04-0 131 SCHRYER HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HU INGTON 8 ACH,CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEAC ,CAL 92649..; ; ,r., +AC69J701/FM CTL• 0003268 05-21-86 1Ot01 PM 1985-86 ,CITY/DISTRICT ' PARCEL' LIST. 'J, PAGE 67� , !'0I3TRICT, NUMBER= 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY t J .PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCELIHO/ J 'OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP ICI : TRA ' k;.' -NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COOL ;146-054- c B wr. 146-054-1 I I. 146-054-24 J'J .,04-00 �t.. 04-007 4-007 !•146-054-11 aU 146-054-1 J 146-0S4-2 04-007 04-007 04-007 r aw 146-054-1 �{ � 146-054-19 04-007 I J 146-054-26 BURLESONs THERA MOZELLE �. 04-007 04-007 TR 9 16282 SANTA ANITA LN HUNTINCTON BEACH# CA 92649 l,:••. 146-054-1 146-054-20 Y 146-055-01 ,/ fJ V-som N&V .04-007 , 0 , J1 it 04-007 04-007 v '� 146-054-1 07M,�j J 146-054-21 ', ! J 146-055-0 J • 04-007 3 04-007 04-007 + • lyj• bx .+ 146-054-15ao-, r 146-054-22 146-055-0 ,04-007 04-007 04-007 A ti l�� I q P.. ,•,, , I r ',••. 'I �. 9t rat, ,. ,j''.h� , f. • II 146-054-16 �f 146-054-23 V1 "146-055-04 04-007 04-007 M 04-.007 11�Pis i6� '.;J '�� t•,.f•� li `' t' .. I „ .. t. F ' II �r' ,. ,,i' 4i 'r4' ',., '1 Y�� RA '•'^�'?0';�}'1 •• ', ' 1i1:,i' '° 1 ,'' � .;, i ., „ e '1 •ea�'•Nt �'i{,�,yy . N 4 Ot M 198/-86 ' CITY/DISTRICT'• PARCEL,,: LIST + PAG! 19971 0?tTRIGT`HUMBIR+ 054A + HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY. .#'PARCEL. NO/'',. OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ " OWNERS ZIP + i1TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE # TRA NAME AND ADDRESS , CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COD1 178-263-11 SPANOp MARY PRANCES 178-263-19 LEITNER, MARC J 178-271-04 AYVAZIAN, ZAOOOR A 04-007 JEWELL 04-007 4932 CHARLENE CIR 04-007 16921 ALGONQUIN ST - XJEWELL, LINDA COSTA MESA, CA 92627 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9t64 16911 BOLSA CHICA ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 178-263-12 MARCH, JOHN F TR / 178-263-20 4922 CHARLENE APARTMEN 178-272-02 HATASHITA, KIM TR, 04-007 • 6541 CRISTA PALMA OR ✓/ 04-007 %TAYLOR, R E 04-007 16991 MALTA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 1 10412 EL DORADO WAY HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9264' i LOS ALAMIT0?, CA 90.720... 178-263-14 BAUER, RALPH H TR 278-263-21 PLATT, EARL L 178=272-03 CHANG, ENRIQUE G 04-007 . 16511 COTUIT CIR 04-007 6392 HEIL AVE 04-007 3922 SIRIUS OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA , 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92641 178-263-15 DOOSON, MARCUS D 178-263-22 CHOP SANG HA 278-273-01 PINEOA, ANSELMO �••' 04-007 9302 GRINOLAY ST 04-007 . ' JO, PAUL S O4-007 16571 CAROUSEL LN' t` CYPRESS. CAL 90630 i9705 OOREEN OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92641 CYPRESS. CA 90630 1' ` .Y., 178-263-16 STRALING, GEORGE J 178-263-23 LANE. ANTHONY J 178-273-02 WHIPPLE, VIRGINIA L 04-007 84 _ ' I'1• 3 2 HACKE7T AVE 04 007 16912 GREEN ST i4 04 007 ,16991 COURTNEY LN ,LONG BEACH, CAL 90808 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92645 , 178-263-17'HIGGINS,; CLARA T j 178-263-25 ANDERSON, STANLEY I ' 178-273-03 BLITHE, BARRY R 04-007• STEWART, ROBERT M 04-007 GUARDIAN S i L ASSN 04-007 16982 LOWELL CIR ,,'' ''! •'.i •• ,. '' 1514E LAFAYETTE ST i - SUITE 209 I .• HUNTINGTON BEACH',; CA 92649 WESTMINSTER, CA. 92683 5200 WARNER AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, •CA 92649' 178-263-18 `CRUZAT,. CHARLES B 4R ET 78-271-03 ASCOT INVESTMENTS 178-273-04 MC CARTHY9' MICHAEL B �:hh"4,t 04-007. 'j•IAL• 04-007 %DAVID H MALCOLM REALTOR 04-007 16968, LOWELL CIR 17352 AVALON'LN'• 2150 SHATTUCK AVE 8819. j ; HUNTINGTON BEACHra•,•.CA 9t649 ' ' HUNTINGTH SCH, ,CAL 92647 - I BERKELEY, CA' 94704 `' R; ;+;' ► �; �• .1 ,. ''• .. r I .', I , � , i`,• .. '.rt'�` 1I. '4 S•'i.,• 1.i',, •',1'' .,5,y`1, J i 'Tr"' l b LyItSl;��,�1rPPP` - �T''., ;, I •i,' •, ' i li� `i.'l' , '! •' ;•' •, 5itt �t5, � �r.,� t1' I, i�T (�*. ' `.I+•'I' "ti,ti•}C•t►tl;�'�{Q. ' 0-es-66 lot 01 PM '1985-66 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST ` . PAGE '1,971 + DISTRICT'NUMBER= 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ��!•�+'! PARCEL NO)* OWNERS ZIP PARCEL .NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP `TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADORES$ CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE - 1,178-l62-Ol'.HAN90N. RALPH A 178-262-08 STEZN,. HOWARD 178-262-1S DOUGHERTT, ROBERT E b •''••`', 04-007 ' P 0 BOX 2564 04-007 7777 EDINGER AVE 04-001 5160 LAUREL AVE •i ' 1 ' SEAL BEACH. CA 90740 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA .92647 CYPRESS, CA 94630 1` l78-262-02 SCHLOSSBERG, KAREN J TR 178-262-09 STEFANSKI, ANDREW F r 178-262-16 CRUZATr CHARLES B' . �i:• ' Al" 04-007 '1370 4TH ST 04,-007 7296 65TH ST "''• �, 04-007 "TR NORCO, CA 91760 LOS ANGELES, CA 90045 ' '1735t AVALON LN NUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 . •I ' i a '„°, .SAP r� r , •' r .,'' • r. ,,_. . ' •' ' ., i•,, � 1• .:'•'�:f Ty''1' .�4r1�';�'i b� , n• � .. rl, )�he��' ' 178-262-03 -SCHLOSSBERG, KAREN J TR 178-262-10 MATTHEWS, THEODORE E ��' 178=262-17 CAMPBEIIi' OANF.ORD'S , ' ` ;•', rt� 04-007 1370 4TH ST 04-007 . 6031 IRONGATE CIR 04-007 16861' GREEN ST sl 4' J� 3•'�I NORCO, CA 91760 ` HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 90621 HUNTINGTON BEACH,i CA 1, 92649 .I• Y` 278-262-04 LOUGHNANE, PATRICK V 176-262-11 WARD, THOMAS P 04-007 6071 SLATER AVE 1200 04 '007 42OZ BRANFORD DR 4,. HUNTINGTOH .BEACH•' CA 92647 1 HUNTINGTN ,BCH, CAL 92649 V I i 78-262-05 LEE, KYOO J. 178-262-12 MUELLER► MICHAEL 04-007 , 17114 MAPES AVE 04-007' 16862 BLANTON ST APT .', CERRITOS, CA 90701 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA ; 92649 1 F.4'�178-262-06 PUTTNER, WERNER 178-262-13 CHELAPATI► C V 4:,104-007 5081 PEARCE' DR 04-007 16901 GREEN ST '.•r"'1s+itrl HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 _ I' a=262-07 ;$TEFANSKI► ANDREW F 178-262-14 BERRY, KENNETH L 04-007"k17t96 W BSTH ST 04-007 13100 MELANIE LN SP 95 '1y'jf !,LDS. ANGELES, CA '; 90045 WESTMINSTER, CA 92683 f,�',t., 'j, I� I t' � ' '' ,t 'r'.j•'r, 1/,1�`tr�'f'�� r CitJ70]/N/;CTL 840If10 0/-21-86 10101 PM 1985-66 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL - LIST ��,�;' •I'013TRICT NUMBER: . 054A iI HUNTINGTON BEACH CITi I ,".' .'iPARCEL NO%, OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS' ' ZIP PARCEL NO/' OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COOS :41oV�'178-E32-06' LEE P CHIA SHENG 178-232-13 GREEN STREET WATER ASSN 176-232-22 RICHEY# HOWARD 04-007 1815 FAIR/ORD DR, 04-007. 16791 GREEN ST 04-007 165S W PALAIS RD ' FULLERTONP CA " 92633 i, HUNTINGTN BCH,• CAL 92649 ', ANAHEIMP CAL ' 9280! " it ,�'�;• I ' is 232-07 S 76- CHNIPPER PETER H 178-232-14 RICHEY HOWARD 178-23E-23 RICHEY. 'HOWARD C . 1 "I 04-007 4051 VIA ENCINAS . 04-007 , 16SS W PALAIS RD 04-007 265S PALAIS RD . J • CYPRESS CA 90630 ANAMEIMP CAL 92802 AHAMEIMP CA 928 02 i 1178-232-08 CAMILONP FELIZARDO 178-232-15 LUKEP BESS ET AL r 04- 07 1 6822 HOSKINS ST APT B 04-007 17071 CAMELOT CIR 0 HUNTINGTON BEACH,; CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 178-232-09 BOYLE, ELISABETH R 178-232-16 HOSKINSON, BERNARD 6 04-007 •721 AMIGOS WAY APT 1 04-007 16793 GREEN ST i NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 HUNTINGTON 'BEACH, CA 92649 f7l3-t33�=60 ��3 178-232-10 WONG, JEAN 178-232-17 BURNS, ROBERT NEIL TR 178-242-01 LOUGHNANE V ' 047007 6781 WARNER 04-007 17089 GREENLEAF ST - ER SUITE 200 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92647 FOUNTAIN VALLEYP CA 92708 . HUNTINGTON BEACHP, CA . 92647 178-232-11.. STANTONP THOMAS E 178-232-18 BURNS, ROBERT NEIL TR 178-242-02 HWANGP JOANNE 04-007 6871 LOYOLA DR 04-007 17089 GREENLEAF 04-007 %HWANGP BIRDIE 1t HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 FOUNTAIN VALLEYP CA 92708 10221 SLATER AVE 8101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,' CA 92708 278-232-12 'WILSONP 'DAMES A, i 178-232-21 RICHEY, HOWARD 178-242-03 SHUP, TZUO-SHIOU Ii1r•'f+ir 04-007 '16841 GREEN ST 04-007 1655 W PALAIS RD 04-007 • 7921 SUNFLOWER LN , HUNTINGTN BCH', CAL 92649 ANAHEIM, CAL 92802 LA PALMA, CA 906E3 �.I t ,.+ '�,F C � il„ t�',�; .�' ' ,�• �',!J:,.I I�I yy , .I'rti�/••.�' .t,�.Y,'77,Y.j,! .J tea, •er ,� r• ..,,� I,,pa � w r• ]� tj dim e�-•A-��+:A,��s1'Fw' t �942-06, CZTT/029TII1CT FARCg0 L:fT •,.DISTRICT NUMBERS 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ' n• ' TRA ., i` NAME 'ANO• A0 RES$ CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS' CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS C00 ! '178-222-141ULRICHr KENNETH 8 178-222-24 JANES* MICHAEL DAVID 178-222-31 JANESr MICHAEL DAVID 04-007 '. 12791 SILVER FOX RD 04-007 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE 0 04-007 • 29SO AIRWAY AVE SUITE "'. LOS ALAMITOS*, CA 90720 1 COSTA MESA* CA 92626 COSTA MESA. CA '92626 J• `',176-222-15 JONESr ROBERT JAMES 178-222-25 JANESr MICHAEL DAVIDV 178-222-32 JANES* MICHAEL DAVID 04-007 9704 SMOKE TREE AVE 04;007 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE 0 1' 04-007 - 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE FOUNTAIN VALLEY'► CA 92708 COSTA' MESA* CA„ 92626' COSTA MESA* CA 92626 .' X78-222-16 MOODY* JANET T 178-222— JANES* HAEL OAVI 178-231-02 HEGW000* RONALD F '.1,',04-007 MAHLMEISTER* GILBERT 6 R 04-0 9 R Y SU E D 04-007 16762 LYNN ST 17164 .EOGEWATER LN T RES A 9262 HUNTINGTN BCH* CAL . 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA � 9264 I :#;'178-222-17 MANUS* C PHILIP 178-222— JANES IC AEL DAV 178-231-03 SMITH. L M , 1 ,04-007 7H HARPER REALTY 0 7 ��4AVE ITE 04-007 807 WALKW000 CIR 15702 GREY OAKS ST 92626 HOUSTON* TX 77079 WESTMINSTER* CA 92683 I I� 178-222-18 JANES* MICHAEL DAVID 178-222-28 JANES HUNTINGTON 178-231-07 SCHMITZ* HAROLD R 1 �a wt:'••.04-007 '2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE D 04-007 APARTMENTS , 04-007 16851 BLANTON COSTA MESA* CA 92626 17932 SKY PARK CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 SUITE D IRVINE, CAL 9271 j I' - 178-222-22 JANES* MICHAEL DAVID "178-222-29 JANES HUNTINGTON / 178-231-08 ST ONGE* J 0 047,007 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE 0 04-007 APARTMENTS V 04-007 ZVAN HORN* D CHANDLER I • •COSTA MESA, CA 92626 17932 SKY PARK CIR 16851 HOSKINS ST "' ' • I I SUITE 0 HUNTINGTH BCH. CAL 92649,' IRVIHE* CAL 9271 �178-222-23 JANES* MICHAEL DAVID 178-222-30 JANES HUNTINGTON 176-231-09 ALYEA* JAMES L I •',�i "104;007 2950 AIRWAY AVE .SUITE 0 04-007 APARTMENTS O4-007 3951 MARION AVE � . ;. y:. COSTA MESA* CA 92626 17932 SKY PARK CIR LOS ALAMITOS* CA 90720. SUITE 0 # IRVINE, CAL 92714 FA MINi •' t = u�Y �.ia�.�4 � .aNa.M;i.,.�st►/�aw1.a�• '«PAM*4k i+.att�; F e f 4 a it Fa R'IA:1l t•',t�� G. a � lri�, r .^' "I ,`!'i'�!. ,�i5 .�• . r[ � 8r �wunal*"� "Os4A �� MUNTINiTON OE ACM CITY !'PARCEL NO/ ; OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP .. TRA NAME AND,AOORESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA 'NAME AND ADDRESS CODE-, 1-•178-211-71 BOXER REALTY CORP 176-211-78 BOXER REALTY' CORP 178-222-04 MAZZARI, CARE + + 04-007., XCARRERA CORP 04-007 %CARRERA CORP 04-007 904 ACACIA BOX 2700 P 0 BOX 2700 HUNTINGTON BEACH.• CA 926481 •c,. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 tt 278-211-72 BOXER REALTY CORP •178-211-79 BOXER REALTY CORP 178-222-05 MAZZARI, EARL •04-007, %CARRERA CORP 04-007 %CARRERA CORP ., 04-007 904 ACACIA AVE BOX 1700 P 0 BOX 2700 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648' HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 178-211-73 BOXER REALTY CORP , 178-211-80 BOXER REALTY CORP •178-222-06 JANES, MICHAEL DAVIO 04-007 P 0 BOX 2700 04-007 %CARRERA CORP 04-007 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE 0 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 P 0 BOX 2700 COSTA MESA, CA, 92626 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 176-211-74,BOXER REALTY CORP 178-211-81 MARCUS, BURTON HERBERT 178-222-07 JANES, MICHAEL DAVID 04-007 %CARRERA CORP 04-007 29306 STADIA HILL LN 04-007 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE 0 BOX 2700 RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA '90274 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 +' HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 i;.f178.211-75 BOXER REALTY CORP. 178-222-01 JANES, MICHAEL DAVID 178-222-11 BAMMER, ALTA 8 '•,,04-007 %CARRERA CORP 04-007 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE �' 04-007 %CENTURY 21 BEACH31DE BOX 2700 COSTA MESAr CA 92626 20902 BROOKHURST ST $101 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 ? HUNTINGTON BEACHr"•CA r9ii'6 •n I l 'y :c I '' t•'��' I'•�178-111-76 dOXER REALTY CORP 178-222-02 OOELL, ROBERT H JR / • 278-222-22 BLEOJIAN,. LEON' �'`• ';::04-007 %CARRERA CORP . 04-007 P 0 BOX 656 04-007 : .6802 KINGS HARBOR OR ;BOX 2700 'I -SUNSET BEACH. CA . ; .9074E RANCHO PAL03 VERGES, CA' 90L pis HUNTINGTON BEACH.. CA 92649 Pf,Yi ! . .....1178-211-77 .BOXER REALTY CORP 178-222-03 ARMSTRONG, GEORGE 1T8-222-13 CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH "I', "J'. ,,04-007 • :%CARRERA CORP_ ,, 04-107 1 ANDER30N PL 04-007 P 0 BOX•190 ":', "••.' i.P 0 BOX' 2700 SURFSIDE, CA 90743 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 192648 ? [,�!!`!?^!,•'+ til HUNTINGTON BEACH,'CA 92649 j �• r' .,` f.' •;1 io•I. I'1� , 'I''. P•.`t i ,G{ + ,I' 1 F {n'� it AT1 ' ,�. .f,l ': f'' •'I',�,j: ,� ,� ' .1 { li` � , i !. yll'.i �r,l'�ri'' ��i13(� � i..il s IF If..�' � � ti �f� i f� r�,• , 1 'n ' ,�/, 1•I �V:; �I + �.. r, i'�F3�� ) � '� <., l il,.*.r�.bird' I t � I.�1��; .k .•�"ii.��ll 1 �A T;��Z � rr lF`IJ��7't,)� j�l��',lJ��iM�� h'�� I�l•'yl jrh •RR .`➢,A YYY , • �• 0 T�tlCT Ir . i, t 'q.l a t• n �a rt z f1!!M8lRs "OS4A. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY LiN�•d�3+�'N a .�1 i;� it t' '4 . . v•. '7 , , •, ',,., ,. I 'F, ,., i I .t .I•'i• 'i 't'.;,,'9�n,,. ;PARCEL NO/ '' t OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNER? ZIP PARCEL NO/ :OWNERS ZIP `!!r�-TRA i'', •1•'•, .' NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 'TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE ,44?vt� I `178%123-26 ROSECRANT,FREDERICK L 3RO 178-143-04' JANES, MICHAEL DAVID .1} 04L007.� 4692 SCENARIO OR -007� 04-007 ,' 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE D r„'+ ..r• {► ;~? �'; ; HUNTINGTN BCH,' CAL ! 92649 COSTA MESA. CA 92626 r 1 i r a 178-123-27 KRUECK, ERICH A 178-142-02 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 178-151-02 8HAUMIK9 MANI L t,04-007 t• 4702 SCENARIO OR 04-007' P 0 BOX 190 .04-007 P 0 BOX 2681 ��•�', ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 I HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA 90274 .17(08-4-12030-728 POPE# LELAND E 178-142-03 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CH •1178_151_ 03 8HAUMIK, MANI L 4712 SCENARIO OR 04-0071 P 0 BOX 190 04-007 P 0 BOX 2681 "'i'1'!•' a HUNTINGTN BCM, CAL 92649 i' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92648 -.ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA 90274. 178-123-29 TILLY, CLAUDE W 178-142-04 HAHN, DAI K 178-151-04 BRETT, TOM J tiA -007 '• 4722 SCENARIO OR 04-007 16692 GREEN ST 04-007 3591 VENTURE OR �. , ...HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 178-123-30 ALLEN, MART I 178-143-0.1 JANES, MICHAEL DAVID 178-151-CS LURWIG, STEPHEN R "04-007- 4732'SCENARIO OR 04-007 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE D 04-007 35SO JASMINE CIR •�`•' :, HUNTINGTN SCH, CAL 92649 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 SEAL BEACH, CAL 90740 178-143-0'2 JANES, MICHAEL DAVID 176-151-06 KOSZORU, JOHN F 04-007 2950 AIRWAY AVE, SUITE 0 04-007 4582 HEIL AVE : : : � '•• :�9 COSTA MESA, CA "92626 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i it r,l _ 178-143-03 JANES, MICHAEL DAVID 178—ISI-07 WING, FRANK J 04-007 , 2950 AIRWAY AVE SUITE 0 04-007 41 HAMPDEN TER 9 lk I COSTA MESA, CA 92626 ALHAMBRA# CAL 91801 " ff i lid 1.,, + .,. i .. 1• •I ! �R4�of,•1'f�'f"� "+"" IH 'd•: '�y))w:�, '``I��tIIV: 1 '' .. •+ .• I I I i � ;P {r... • , 4 , ,`EIS., 1 •t. .f1l''•/'I,.It 'j ily,I. � 1�'1•`,��7 1 1 - S - 0 ' 'r�� .� 1 •',., '' I .!' ,� , '. '•+'..'�{j' l,: ,; i'•I • `�,71•r7' �''�LI• J �,� �J� •II' 4 '� ''�LJFy �DSSTRICT• NUMBERt 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH C2TY! t. ;.' �•�, 1•• ':,,:r` ..I�Pi';,! ' 7 I I li. 1;" I 1: 1' ,�j� 1 a•�r''.ti' ) • 1 , •.d ;,,•� 11,1• F i�'� ;`;PARCEL NO% OWNERS " ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARC[L1 NO/, OWNERS ZIP41 I', TRA,' • ' ?, NAME •AND ADDRESS CODE TRA 1NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA -NAME'-AND ADDRESS '`CODj"> ^I` YY;4~ , •,,' .i 1 , I I I " .i. , 11• II• I','.' ••,1 f146-042-03 GREOOIREr MARCELLE 146-042-10 SCHOLE3. 'BRUCE E ✓ �! 146-042 17 MILLER, ALLEN F ':'04-087 1 16301 GOLDEN CATC. LN / 04-007 16371 GOLDEN GATE LN ° �.• 04-007. 26372 SARATOGA LN' ,.' ✓ •. + w. tl!�} �•' HUNTINGTON BEACMr CA v 92609 t MUNTINGTON BEACN, CAL 92649 ; HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAL 9E641' j2Uf�'.. +3146-042-04 'SHANAHAN, MONTY J 146-042-11 LOCKEN, L KRIS 146-04L-18 KLUSSMANN. CHARLES H Le -007 16311 GOLDEN GATE LN f 04-007 16381 GOLDENGATE LH 04-007, 16302 SARATOGA LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 .; 146-002-05 O'KELLY, BETTE E' I J 146-042-12 KOMPLESKI, MYRTLE V J 146-042-19 KNOWLES,' RICHARD C . t 04-007 • 16321 GOLDEN GATE LN 04-007 16401 COLDENGATE LN 04-007 16352 SARATOGA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649• HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL' 92649 1�146-042-06 ,H000E, WILLIAM E J 146-042-13 SUTTON, GARY C 146-042-20 'CAORA. PAUL 04-007 16331 GOLDEN GATE LN 04-007 16411 GOLDEN GATE LN 04-007 '16342 SARATOGA LN V HUNTINGTN ,BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 •; ''146-042-07 THIEN, NHON NGUYEN ` 146-042-14 SYLVESTER, SHARON L 146-042-21 DOUGHER, STEVEN P 04-007 16341 GOLDEN GATE LN 04-007 16412 SARATOGA LN 04-007 16332 SARATOGA LN �'•,I •. HUNTINGTON BEACH? CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-042-08 KURLINSKI, JAMES R 246-042-15 PACKER, ADA P 146-042-22 HARDY, MICHAEL 0 04-007 ' 9019 SAGE AVE 04-007 10034 VAN RUITEN ST 04-007 1632L SARATOGA LH CORONA. CA I 91720 I BELLFLOWER, CA 90706 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CAJ 92647 . J. �' — 4 — 4 — OW N6 IRG— A O N ERNARD 1 6 0 2 23 C I Y IL ' U - 4 0 ITRACY MART M 146 042 16 MC F O E r B . 4 0 ! 9 _1 6 r 63 1 GOLDEN CATE LN 04-007 DOUGLAS O4-007 P 0 BOX 1081 y.. .:'04 007 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 16382 SARATOGA LN TORRANCE,, CA 9050b '{ •.' HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 I' ` c4�• , ,MLR(•yS'7'l" '7f7In, .76F�,'�Fr��''�?�rwui•4��r..,�ni s,.y,r�' 'Lr�,��.•t.�n;��, � ,wry • , I '1' 1� 4w►-"+'a+��4a/WN4+MW J{1MIk+Yi JtiA%�'�.��', 5�•w�l{9�7' �� •' I , � •,�� I�°w ` I i . .. I , ,I , ICI . _ .. ,- 1 ,. • II�.��/ al•.'w,•11'1 , t , ' , 1 •. I '., iJ •�. iJl• 1 '�f. ,.hl�!•PI',P . • ''�'1�L�..tr�. 'i '' .t i � . .1., � .rll .^a�ia•...an.«r- � � rJ ! r - LIST PAi! 670 s"''c. ICT NUMBER: A BAHUNTINGTON BEACH + ''•• �','I'�7�, � ��.��'f'�v �,1 ,�i iMx..vlr.ua!r Ytl �bARCE NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ ' OWNERS ZIP; •, TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA i NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS 0001r ' 146-043-20 SEOANE, BARBARA 146-043-27 KEISTERr PAUL J 146-043-34 TRIMMER, PAUL H �•ri ' ,• � 04-007 16351 SARATOGA LN 'I 04-007 5142 CALIENTE DR 04-007'. 5222 CALIENTE CIR X, HUNTINGTON BEACH,, CA u 92649 , HUNTINGTON BEACH; CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH+ CA 9L649''� .146-043-21 KtNG, CONNIE S 146-043-28 CUNNINGHAM# MICHAEL F 146-043-35 600, RICHARD U ;.. 04-007 16361 SARATOGA .LN 04-007 515E CALIENTE OR I ' 04-007 523E CALIENTE OR 1 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 . ! HUNTINGTN BCHr• CAL •92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH.' CA 9261491 �J � 146-043-76 OEHLERKIN6r1FR ' H-043-l2 000N —OI3-29 WOOOWARD, CLIFFORD S /146 1r,•.t�� 04-007 16371 SARATOGA LN 04-007. 516E CALIENTE OR ' 04-007.' S24! 'CALIENTE DR HUNTIN6TON BEACH►; CA 92649 i HUNTIN6TN BCH. CAL 92649 ,;+ "f HUNTIH6TN BCM, CAL 9E647 ''i�,.l ,. i :'' . • 1: ! ,�� j1� -+ IJ ',!1,,• 1,1; ; ' 146-043-37 ANT,146-043-23 CHUAN. EUGENIA NISHIMINE 146-043-30LOPEZ, MICHAEL R ANTI .,,,• + 04-007 19471 SANOCASTLE; LN 04-007 5162 CALIENTE OR 04-007. . SZ41 HEIL AVE. HUNTIN670N BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTIN6TON BEACH, CA 92649 "C', .' HUNTINGTON BEACH,• CA'.;,,.• �, 92649 �;• , •„ .' ,! r 1 .. f;r "' tit ;,146-043-24 PHANEUf, ARMAND 146-043-31 JACOBS. BETH SARAH 146-043-38 KAVIN, BRUCE: %04-007 38 CARVER 04-'007 519E CALIENTE DR 04-007 '.. SE31 HEIL AVE ! IRVINE, CA 92714 , HUNTINGTON BEACH+ CA 92649* HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 192649 ii146-043-25 PATTERSON, WILLIAM J `` 146-043-32 GONZALEZ. JORGE Z 146-043-39 BAN, ANDOR 04-007 16411 SARATOGA LN v 04=007 5202 CALIENTE OR 04-007 • 5221 HEIL AVE HUNTINGTON" BEACH,CAL 92649 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA .92649 j �46-043-26 PRESHELL, WILLIAM C 146-043-33 TEATERr GLENN A 146-043-40 BRADOONr STEPHEN R V 04-007 ""16421 SARATOGA LN 04-007 5212 CALIENTE OR 1 04 007 5211 HEIL AVE . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 •rt ' �' ,:.�."�i;+VAaI:?i:7i:v'�,'StE.r�{F1N�.,�aalKt.�4itt'it d:►aJi�y�� - - 14 .. if� �* r tt' ,. •r ,. 1�}' L;!� � I' IfZa UNTINGAla -4m TO r ,. OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL'NO/ OWNERS ZIP NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME ANO ,ADORESS CODE TRA • NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 63-It3-14'AL-MUSSAWIR@ FAROUK 163-131-12 LARSON@ ANN J !, �'" 163-131-19 BISHOP@. BTRON MERVIN +t'04-007, *-56 BATTERY AVE 04-007 5142 THORN TREE LN 04-007 • 4781 PEARCE ST APT 1 ' ?S 4, ` • BROOKLYN, NY 11228 .. IRVINE@ CAL 92715 HUNTINGTON BEACH@ CA 9t649 :163-1123-15 'SUH.,CHUN9 I 163— 31— SUCCELLA@ •FRANKLIN J.TR 163-131-20 BUCCELLA@ ►RANKLIN J TR 04-007 '20330 MANSEL.AVE 0 00 3541 COURTSIOE CIR 04-007 3S41 COURTSIOE CIR 'TORRANCE@' CA , 90503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH@ CA 92649 ,_ram �ti�• .:.t," ...1. ,II � I , ,•t r'' r , 163-123-16;CROSMAH@".ALEXAHOER 163 31 4 S NE C ET AL ' 163-131-21 SWANIGAN@ HERBERT V TR L' �;Y04-007 .:.SUITE 300 0 71 H OR BLUFFS CIR 04-007 17132 —A : ,,.3355 ,TORRANCE B AP C HARBOR BLUFFS CIR :�;;c„`70RRANCE• CA 90503 TIN ON BEACH @ CA 92649 I HUNTINCTON BEACH, CA 92649. �; ,' 163-1l3-17�CR0lMAN@ .AL[XANDER iM 16 13 UC A@ FRANKLIN J TR i 163-131-22 CHAN@ HILARY K M , ,.', ;•1 � v04-007 .,,.;SUITE 300 � 4— URT, m CIR 04-007 9042 KIN83 CANTON OR 3 �• ;;''• '3555 TORRANCE SL NUN CTON BEACH@ CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH'@ CA 9264 r."TORRANCE@ CA 9 0 I cr , .,1, '1n� �163-123-18 RATSIU. EMIL 1 1 —131-16 CHI@ SHAO—MI 163 3 2 E E N R P R E I �• 04-007 :9150 OINSDALE 3T 04-007 5172 DUNBAR 0 86 0 0 0 T V 'DOWNEY, CA 90240 HUNTINGTON BE H@ CA 92649 AR@ A ,(i '}363-123-19 BUPFINCTON@• JOSEPH P 163-131-17 MC CRADY@ NE LSO 163-131—ib CABO DEL' MAR HOMEOWNERS '' '�� • 04-007 +•16092 CORAL CAT LN 04— 07 P 0 BOX 2220 04-007 ASSN .gip, rccc��t +w.HUNTINSTOH BEACH@ CA 9264 SEAL BEACH@ CAL %VILLAGE INVESTMENTS 1176 MAIN ST • t �:v Y� ',5! IRVINE r CA 927140 16��131-11:NAKACMI@' TOM 1 3-13I 16 STEIN, HONAR0 E j' 1.163-1 — ABO DEL MAR HOMEOWNER! ,; i t+04-007,:••.17901 SHAMLET CIR 04-00 51 HUNTINGTON CENTER 't 04-007 ASSN ;'. Iwi��• ., 1HUNTIHGTOH BEACH.. C 92649 HU INGTON BEACH, CA 9264? %VILLAGE INVESTMENTS 1176 MAIN'ST: CA 92714 s �'�t} 1 �•+.- .-...-'-i., �a,rswi ,�Y1i1 1- Alt .. y• „� �.j�t '•ate _ + , ^�� 'vA.� 7 � ,��,, ,+:, t 1. ,I .rl,r 1 ' '11 .',r,.', �• ''il Ar' 'tr;hr,, ,y•Jr' .`G#�ji !, y' },;, }' ,,i ,�. , I C7 ! ,.1t ', + , ' '�'r {}' P,: s.{r1:' .a �. f." � t f}WON l/ss��}�tr•'9�s-Ii+oojao.oi •n�':, G s�oo-opt, oi7lriosorwsnr .,r�waa% { uswv ,,i ,t L 'C, ,' �' i;.'I< .',e , o oM s + DISTRICT'NUMBER:' 054A ,! HUNTINGTON BEACH CITT ,? �M•,' PARCEL 'NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZII ! ^�!• TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS. ' 'COO TRA NAME AND ADDRESS' . COC +�^{1 163-023-10 MOONr TUNG' JO0 163-025-17 BEHRENDT► DONALD'•F 163-031-05 TASSELLI, JOSEPH "i. _ _ .f 04-007,. 5932 NORDINA OR 04 007 5852 NORDINA DR 04 007 ,5451 [L DORADO, ;• e HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL 9264 ,: HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL'• �� 926� '- j' ?' 163-025-11 ALIr AHMED A 163-025-18 THOMAS JOHN A JR 163-031-06 ANDERS N DONALD A r 0 . .{ !, 04-007,; BOX-R NORTHROP 941 04-007 5842 NOROINA OR 04-007 5441 EL DORADO OR {(�1+ ' • APO NEW TORK 09616 HUNTINGTON BEACH,! CA "92649' ,,HUNTINGTN BCH ' CAL �`�r l,', ,, `., ,. '. ,' '. .. .' , .,i., ,,, .,. ,. ,'•I,,J+,'• � ,',a 1:'.., 1u .,. ',` ..'. ,a. '.I�.+rt i'. '�„1CKt�i,4*.4 163-025-12 OSTERLUNOr CHARLl3 W JR 163-025-19 CITT "OF HUNTINGTON BEACH' u 161-031-07 REEO# JAMES A , Ci 04-007 5902 NORDINA OR 04-007' 'CITY HALL ;,' ` 04-0071 5431 EL DORADO OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN,BCH, CAL•..• ; , ,, .92648 HUNTINGTN DCH# CAL {,:926� j L. t, ;�, .,L } ' 163 25 lE REZvAN, PARVZZ. 16.3 031-01 KENEIPPr GLENN D 1630311-16 •KRILLr S PH EN r M it? ' ,�• r 04-007 7021 NIMROD OR ;04-007, 17072 ST ANDREWS LN ` ''04-007 5411 IEL DORA00'`DR '' ' ', r• '. ,•I + .—HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 NUNTINGTN. BCHr CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' . '('t9t64 'I •. — _ 63 OYS 4 ONNE LY JOSE H T -0 0 1 1 0 L P A R 163 031 ' J HNSON PATRZCIA C 1 �, Y r 163 031 17 IUNOgUZST# JOHN • tin I,+ ,04-007';:' 2015 NAPOLI DRI 04-007 17052' ST ANDREWS LN .. '04-007 5421 ELDORADO OR'• I. , I .1 1'OXNAROr CA. 93030 I HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA ' 'a9164 263-025-15 WHITNETr GART' E 163-031-03 ORGILL, LINDEN H 163-031-20 POTTSi'RICHARD 0 "'• ;','. ' • 04-007 5872 NORDINA OR 04-007 17042 ST ANDREWS LN , 04-007 5381 EL.00RADO. DR . UNT N N C y• .' HUNTINGTON OH CH 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH CAL ', 2649 ',' H I 6T B ',CAL ' ' TIN T BEA. CA . M,, :9Y64 I I {, fi•e6�: i i '1 163-OYS-16 fINOLATr THOMAI 163-031-04 RIPLETr JANELLTN M 163-031-21 WIE6ANOr JACK 0 04-007 5862 NOROINA DR 04-007 17032 SAINT ANDREWS LN 04-007 S391 EL DORADO OR {�yti HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL '192644 'r' I f' I94Aa7.!f' :JL'�NUNTiNBYOM •EACH CZTY r ,'t "�•J, �. :if —! �, y ' r•:�' .t ,S't, ;'i ,'4y L ',,' ARClLN0/ ,!. "' OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP' PARCEL NO/, OWNER! ZI �) • TRA . NAME AND ADDRE35 CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS -CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COD 163-041-04 DAVIOSONr JEANNE, C 163-041—I1 HLAVATY, JAMES M 163-04Z-10 CLEMENS, DONALD F" 1t; i •• 04-007 17062 NEWQUIST LN 04007 17152 NEWQUIST LH' / 04-007 17101 HEWQUIST LN HUNTINGTON 8EACM, ,CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA v 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH. CAL 9264 AA 163-041-05 BOYER. HARRY R 163-042-04 CASTROP, CHARLES W 163-042-11 MEZZASALMA, JOHN 04-007 1709E NEWQUIST LN 04-007 17011 HEWQUIST LN 04-007 17111 NEWQUIST LN yy HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 iy HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9L649 163-041-06 GLENN, THOMAS D 163-042-05 RASE, HARLAN H 163-042—IS COOK. DAVID T , 04-007 171OZ NEWQUIST LN 04-007 17031 NEWQUIST LN / 04-007 5331 EL DORADO DR HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL v 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 163-041-07 CARET, DAVID A 163-042-06 LINGENFELTER, ROBERT K 163-042-16 BORUTZKI, MANS M „ 04-007 17112 NEWQUIST LN 04-007 17051 NEWQUIST LN 04-007 5321 EL DORADO ST HUNTINGTH BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 , HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 91649 163-041-08 ASAOOURIAH, ARMENi 163-042-07 LEONARD, DENNIS D 163-042-17 GROVER, DAVID B 04-007 17122 HEWQUIST LN 04-007 17071 NEWQUIST LN 04-007 5312 EL DORADO DR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 163-041-09 BARNES, DUANE 0 163-042-08 MC LE00► PAUL 163-042-18 CAMPSELL, JAM ES E J 04-007 17132 NEWQUIST LH 04-007 17081 NEWQUIST' LN 04-007 17112 GREENTREE LN , HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9L649 163-041-10 HANKIN, ROBERT B 163-042-09 HARRIS, DAVID A 263-042-19 LIGGETT, NANCY W TR 04-007 17142 NEWQUIST LN 04-007 17091 NEWQUIST LN U 04-007• 17102 GREENTREE LN HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 , � ' i l�t• .I 1 � i' ,'I ',i,:!:., f 1 L �. 1l f'��',t, � •Ldc ILjiP'1�t��'yl�•� �f{'I i '. .V! 1 '1•^ il t ,� , I• .�� ;•`tif7 la�1N t»�� '.'t lMf(' �N Ca•ip+'t J��. ,1 t• � •♦ i' - - ___ a { - _ .� � .,.. ••� '` � .-}�r..z'. �,.,ti ,'I,,r, ��::.n,1'!�.+� �:f�'?I�'\W'i 6 ,�4y!1 r F a wr11• R �.NYRO w�i soma s• 'I fH' vaos*t so X 1rult;�RJ~ r��R�i� ;'i QMf .1 P.rM •0 •RRAss• tort : '. . ,IAA N•M •M NNRtt Alt �If -1♦ AtANfr�RAl'-ROilf LIN,'' • 163-129-11 BUCCELLA, FRANKLIN J TR 16S-11S-06 BAXTlR. ILNAR JONN ,,-04-007; Oi91'LARAMI[ CIR 04-007 3341 COURTSIDE CIR. ;•, 04-007 19844 DEEP HARBOR OR ry•` I, WrSTMINSTERr CA / 92683. ' HUNTINGTON BEACH. C4 92649 . • L HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA, ,9964FA 163-122-05 HARBr MAJID B 163-222-12 GUARDIAN S i L ASSN 163 123 07.ALLISONr ROBERT GLENN , 04-007 9878 AVENIDA MATEO 04-007 5200 WARNER, AVE 04-007 2126 E 7TH ST I CYPRESS► CA 90630 k SUITE 209 LONG BEACH, CA 90604 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA ' 92649 163-122-06 RYBERG, BYRON L 163-123-01 ZIEBARTH, WARREN S .� 163-123-08 MOODY, JANET T 04-007 17062 LESLIE LN 04-007 ' P 0 BOX 3149 04-007 4641 LOS PATOS AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CAJ 92649 SEAL BEACH► CA 90740 MUNTINGTON BEACMr CA 9264 ' I 163-122-07 BUCCELLA► FRANKLIN J TR 163-123-02 KAROOS, THOMAS 163-123-09 THOMPSON. WILLIAM H TR� -194-007''. : 3541, COURTSIDE CIR 04-007 P 0 BOX 127 04-007 '17017 EDGEWATER LH HUNTINGTON„ BEACH, ,CA 92649 SUNSET BEACH, CA 90742 HUNTINGTON BEACH,. CA 9264 J 163-222-08 BUCCELLA, FRANKLIN 'J TR 163-123-03 HOCHSCHILD, ARTHUR A 3RO 163-123-10 LEAHY, FRANK W 04-007 3541 COURTSIDE CIR 04-007 4841 CURTIS CIR 04-007 177 RIVERSIDE OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 NEWPORT BEACH, CA .92660 163-122-09 WILSON* WILLIAM H J 163-123-04 DAWSON ENTERPRISES / 163-123—I1 SARGENTr JEFFREY J 04-007 16961 BOLERO LN 04-007 P 0 BOX 6039 V 04-007 17122 BOLSA CHICA ST !D a. HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 LONG BEACH,. CA. 90806 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 % 163-122-10 WOOD, WILLIAM A TR 163-123—CS MOODY, JANET T 163-123-13 ONG, IVY K TR 04-007 17092 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR 04-007 %TATES. BETTY A 04-007 HANAOA, HENRY HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 5042 DUNBAR ST. 22822 STARFIRE LH ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 , HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92646+ *ELM) �'jj I 'A� T .! ��. •I� 'L ' I • I A/A N wai r.,q 0• / • �MMC♦ IMI, i ,!y6 i 7M�tN A/A A1�1010 COIO tAA Nam, AM A111011 co" ��i;"# Mw+•,'t + :.'. Mom:��'M1A*11 �13-334-0 DANZ. WILLIAM V 163-116-01, WAROELL, MICHAEL 1 163-216-06 OOAN. UYIN V ;04-007 17151 TIFFANY CIR 04-007 '36e2 K2RH OR 04-007 5612 KIRN OR "�•e,. „ MUNTINGTN BCM. CAL 92649 HUHTINGTOH BEACH, CA 92649 + HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649; 163-114-10 WANNSTEOT, DAVID R 163-116-02 SANDERS, MARY B 163-116-09 ERWIN, LA FRASHIA EILEEN 04-007 17141 TIFFANY CIR 04-007 5672 KERN OR 04-007 5602 KERN OR HUNTINGTON BEACH,. CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, 'CA 92649 :-'163-115-01 ZOURAS, DENNIS L ' 163-116-03 BALLIET, HARRY A .04-007 17132 TIFFANY CIR 04-007 5662 KERN.OR HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 HUNTINGTN• BCH, CAL 92649 .. •9. .1163-115-02 MILLS, HAZEL B TR 163-116-04 GOHTARZ, JOHN A •• ' Y `• .:04-007 .,'S681 KERN DR i 04-007 5652 KERN ORfGg ' 'HUNTINGTON BEACHi CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 lT�=fl EiAC�. #.163-115-03 MILLS, JAMES F 163-116-05 HALSTEAD, LESTER M .UvT & 04-007 5691 KERN DR 04-007 5642 KERN DR � i .`; �Gl:IVlilt�r11 1-A HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 ~- Q p�p•'V�s�, `•163-115-04 SCHOENMAN, JONN H 163-116-06 WINTER, DONALO L �6+,3^' 04-007 5701 KERN OR 04-007 5632 KERN DR �f' �Q bT)„ 1 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 + A "163-115-OS GORSKE, ARNOLD LOWELL 163-116-07 HAFERSAT, ERNEST C ,••.�;:. 04-007 17121 HERBERT LN 04-007 r 5622 KERN OR tt HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 ;bs ��h • ' ' .i � .. .•' I � i '.' 71.E A •tali j:.' Y/1';/1 a', ' hl,A 14;l.,+• ••Y i� r' '4 .! I'' '� '1�' t tM�. L... .11 '1'„n�,i;'' il' .. . 1 f.lb•':. '� �, .T•1 i'it �,',.•d I' (,p•D ,. IL i '1k;;`fl•' y,,,• •':r 0� COOP TRA MAMf ANO �OORIff ' ''[.' 1 COOP y �' 'It�TRA<<'i' �`Fy4gAMf;A11q' 9wlM �OJ•1[1-06rfOfO=AN, lANU[t TR 163-ltl-i2 l3PINOiA. ROOOLFO �;(( 163-121-99,CHENY.`rS"AN• YIN + ' G ° ••i' 1'0•-007 ;'Jeff SIRIUS OR 04-007' S121 DUNBAR AVE I�I�. 04-007. '.;,' 9410 ACHILLE3' Olt i; �� • '�F 1 ',: "HUNTSNBTON BEACH.. CA 99649 I HUNTINGTON REACH* CA ✓9t6491 ( 4 i ;y MOLLYN000L0 .CA ' `` I I; �4' + 'goo 6 1; ! ' I ilk k , •1• rl " i. i +.I� �,I,�; `; f [';kk9i'��1 NJ �`' f Y{� �.,' ^ r,•ti ,I,r,' '• �, . . ; � rile " . ;, ,li I. I� ,�,, '� a � ?�;� �,� 163-121-07•DOWNS, ,STEPHEN F ✓ 163-121-23 OLIVER,'BRYAN ARLIS i 163-1t1-30 BAKER, BARBARA E .04-007 A 117 04-0071 702S SEAL CIR 04 007.., 17042 BOLSAICHICA SURFSIDE* CA 90743 i ' HUNTINGTON. BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTH BCH,'•'CAL, ,. 92649'' •' 1 ` .111 1 i. ' I :1 S , , , 11 83-121-08 BOLSA 'CHICA PROPERTY LTD 163-121-24 OOWNS,. STEPHEH F ! � 163-121-31 GERACI', 'GREGORY E 04'-007 %PATTERSON FINANCIAL 04-007 A —117 04-007 6ERACI* PAMELA s, 3075 CITRUS CIR SUITE 100 SURFSIDE, CA 90743 '17062 BOLSA CHICA ST ti ;lye WALNUT CREEK, CA 945 8 I HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92647 _ 163-121-09 BOLSA CHICA PROPERTY LTD 163-121-25 TOKARUK, JOHN 0 163-121-41 MSZEH, HSIHG—CHIN 04-,007 - XPATTERSON FINANCIAL 04-007I P 0 BOX 1657 04-007 P 0 BOX 8796 a:"• ','; 3075 CITRUS•CIR SUITE 100 1 HUNTINGTH BCH# CALJ 92647 FOUNTAIN VALLEY* CA,. 92728 '' WALNUT CREEK* .CA 94598 I63-121-10 LIAO.' HSIE MING 163-121-16 WENG, CHING CHUNG 263-121-48 CROSMAN, ALEXANDER C ./ 104.007 1142'N SANTA ANITA 04-007: 16402 HOBART LN 04-007 %CARL PEARLSTON ATTY ; ARCADIA, CA '' 1 910Q6 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 MICHAEL WURMBRAND ADM •SUITE 300 �;',la ; ` , .. •. I 3555 TORRANCE OLYD TORRANCE, CA 90503 •Z - 63-1t1-11 PIERATT, ANITA 263-121-27 GARONER, JOHN L \ 263-121-49 NAKACNI, TOMMY T 04-007 1.. 5132 WARNER AVE 04-007' 7129 N MARINA PACIFICA ZSR 04-007. 17901 SHAMLEY CIR I' ''• HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i LONG BEACH, CA' 90803 HUNTINGTON BEACH,' CA 92649 263 221-21 TOKARUK* LOIS M 263-221-28 ALYEA, JAMES L 163-121-50 BUCCELLA, FRANKLIN J 'TR 04-007 , P 0 BOX 2714 SUITE 673 04-007 3951 MARION AVE 04-007 3541 COURTSIDE CIR r,. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA ' 92649 SjLhl�q:k.+y'TrE�:�11-3.,/.> TR`Ma'�'�fl��i`"r,..s � �.�� SJ: �1 0, i`.-4o ''v. •`r'. I I . I r ° . 1 '�J „y 1� . '+n, Il.' I. ,I i I Ir' 4 +'I•�t I ('. tl S 7.4°4 jfi+ i ff A I , o;7 ii1� 1 G'}��..r7 .• _. , r , -+ _ rho .f S. Y.,yh tl #.h� 14 t. , •fln p `. 7 lit. •' { ire iil i`7' J4}_ ,,. t •' .:. Leas j �I � i'1, '�'b” Ai. ir'LJ � '+il { ' '• 'PAIff 4i,.N0✓ ,r MMe IV t=f* ►AACf1. NO/ TRA •i„'� ►n+,s„''NAMt'ANO AOOR[9s COOQ TR,A NAME ANO AODR[33 E COD! 7nll,. !'TRA:G 1 !q}r A•;MAMl ANO'ADDA s d ar163-091-31 .BUCK LEY,; BILL 163-1,01-05 RUDDY, EDWARO 'J wf3� 04-007 5712 KERN OR 04—,007 ;,17091 BERLIN LN t ,• 1 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 L 163-091=32 BURGESS,` TIMOTHY R 163-101-06 CORNWELL, RALPH E - U I, 04-007',' 5702 KEIN DR 04—,,007 '17081 BERLIN LN 'HUNTINGTON BEACH', CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 00Y 163-091-33'HARRIS, JACKSON B 163-1101-07.LUCAS, GARY J 163-101-14: ANDERSON, CHERYL J b1 : 04-007 5692 KERN DR 04 007 17071 BERLIN LN 04-007 '.,5551 ROGERS OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 '163-101-01 CARTERS RICHARD L 163-1'01-08 VERGILIO, EDWARD A ' 163-101-15 PLANK, LAWRENCE M JR 31:;,,1 04-007 17131 BERLIN LN 04—,007•, 1,7051 BERLIN ILN 04-007 17152 TWAIN LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON.BEACH, CA 92649 + 163-301-02 TEMPLE, DORIS Mp�3. ¢h i ;r6 IfjlRi} JLL AH' , 163 101 16 TESKEY, MERLYN F . 04-007. ''17121 BERLIN LN 'B4` 00 1�} 0�► IY " '0 •., f 04-007 9772 CORNERBROOK DR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 +0i ''�i 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 t 163-101-03'TWIFORD, GARY A 163y' OI ` `EL1 T 163-101-17 CROTHERS, BETTY J 04-007. 17111 BERLIN LN 04-007 SS81 ROGERS DR. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 �'`�'`""'S.��,}}�i7N}+IM,6JT{,Q ? E�►CM 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL. 92649 1 t '1tr+v ,�g..a,'tr•{M+�'f�-.'R'7-+t, L. "163-101-04 GABELMAN, DALE F ?f163 �kr16rR, FMA �1;'B�RBARII'+�ANt�3A 163-101-18 PHILLIPS, ENMITY R 04r007 17101 BERLIN LN i` �'0� `00� TP5 ,/ RO ER,S�rST� 04-007 • 5591 ROGERS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 �L+ H T "� ItC �'1" 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 .. r,'r4". . I .t•• ., i d1 1 Y.., +j.),• � I rr` �r.� h: y, _i.E.`Ir .P ti;.j•." ��' `'+n �{1,8�u j�j.��{'.►�1,i 1,'1 .. :r)J �I 7t1 i.. :,,. f r,1�•" ,J .' .� � '' ',{� �` � Jr •,» ,, ; I r' 1;�'•f j�,. 'i ' .4' ,t' .I,Frfi'� 11�f w �I'f4';n'f � • `('UJl f, iYl'. �OSSTRICT NUMBER O94A' MUNTINaTON BEACH CITY I i :;r'� `' ` •S °` 'sl},' ,', �t(`i�.:fl►# '1 ij' 1 1 PARCEL NO/ '•1 ` OWNERS II ZIP PAR O NAME AND ADDRESS COOS TRH r I A SS CODE TRA ; NAME .AND AODRESS 't COOL t 146-a9 _OT=iIARNER CENTER ASSOCIATES 146-601-06 MOODY, JANET T / ''f.•146-601-13 HSU* HONE-YEN 1,04-0 7, 17931 SEAL 1LV0 SUITE�M 04-007 4641 LOS PATOS v t:l' ,:04-007. 12020 -B CENT RALIA '4 ` ''"'••F' HUNTINo�N CL1r�� 92647 t' �.��Y;..,••I h HUNTINGTON,BEACH, CA 92609 t HAWAIIAN QARDENS, C 90716 146-591-08 WARM Cl ER ADDITION 146-601-07 MOODY, JANET T 146-601-14 KUMAGAIr HENRY ICHIR 3'OQ-007 O6IA ES O4-007: 4641 LOS PATOS , 04-007. 19021 E CANTON OR � „ • dj,', 7931 BE CH LVD SUITE M i HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92649 ORANGE, CA 92667, f }1✓,• HUNTINGTN CH, AL 92647 1. A '/a r rrirRl 'f•ta 1�6-601-0I,SROBERG. JACK 1; 146-601-08 MOODY, JANET T 146-601-15 SWAROOP, SATINDER :04-007 22211 EUCALYPTUS' 04-007 4641 LOS PATOS 04-007 5 RUE CHATEAU ROYA 4L �,'1 EL TORO, CA 92630 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 146-601-02 MOODY, JANET T 146-601-09 MOODY, JANET T 146-601-16 SWAROOP. SATINDER � 04-007 4641 LOS PATOS O4-007 4641 LOS PATOS O4-007 5 RUE CHATEAU ROYAL ;•�+. " ' 'HUNTINGTON BEACH, C 92649 ` I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . ` NEWPORT BEACH, CA ' 92660 146�601-03 MOODY, JANET T / 146-601-10 TOROSIANr ARTHUR 146-601-17 GRAGE-WILLSON ..:' '04-007 "4641 L03 PATOS ✓ 04-007 5081 'CRESENT OR 04-007 2062 BUSINESS CENTE OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SANTA ANA, CA ' 92707 SUITE 105 IRVINE, CA 92715 . 146-601-04.MOODY, JANET T 146-601-11 MOODY. JANET T 146-601-18 BROWNING. MARK J :04-007 � 4641 LOS PATOS O4-0071 4641 LOS PATOS O4-007 16771 ROOSEVELT ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA . , 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA ' 92649 146-601—OS DOWNING, RALPH 146-601-12 HSU, HONG-YEN 146-601-19,HSU, HONG YEN 14 '04-007., 2647 E ALMOND AVE JO 04-007 12020 —B CENTRALIA AVE 04-007 12020 —A CENTRALIA AV "I ORANGE, CA 92669. HAWAIIAN GARDENS. CA 90716 HAWAIIAN GARDENS, CA 90716 °� Piss .f ?Iii� Fil>wtl�l` i�, if•'A'l R! •� r . P.1: . .� i .t f . ,�; �yt ++++ 11.� .�ttFy'T�`li°•4" Ir• •f,�;�l!%Yix l!t'l , :t .'1 i ., 1, •l + 1.' • ', 'r '.I , il,•�•f�,I )'r r�i1p ,,,'y� tj` ll.�'1fi �t,,fr t, ,' ta.•..� we•iw.1aC ,f:4 ,,+.N.,• a;l. .i,t!eNr...wr.aJ '.., l: •'1',144.! , r,ivliltA:.'Na•�'i'ytl� i,a'' IIL" ', ! OWN Mkt [es' GTON BEACH CITYI i,. ,I',., I,, �I �.� ., �, i ;:,.��r ' I��{•,'1. F , tf11� ',i1�f'"��, ' PARCE L'NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ 'OWNER • • • "�: r' I �. i).' „ i;w' 3 ' ZIP l• PARC[LBO<••-_ �OWNIRs 'TRA ;�'%- NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA ' NAME AND ADDRESS, CODE TRA ""'K--i! ML_ANO ADOR[i• 000E 146-494-21' FIEL03. JOSEPH D' JR 146-bD1-01 sWINAYE ,'TOR3TIEN D!:• tt 146-50 �tRN TER, "a,it. Jjr:,04-007 5421 DIAMOND OR 04-007 '16151 ANGLER LN 04-007 „ SVL P 0 54X 0 ^.;,,, ;•, HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 -�_HSJ.NlINfii!>LB AL 92647' VICT , CA ' 146-444-LL CALKIN3, R M 14 50101-FINLEY, GERALD R TR 146-501-09 A , AU ` f;�',' 04-007 5431 DIAMOND OR f04-007 16161 ANGLE A LN 04-007 16241 AN RN HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92647 HUNTINGTON JEACH, CA 92647 HUNTING SCUP CAL 92647.. '�li;�l��•.i —ice"-- -_____--��!'. . f I ;46-494-23 RICE, DONALD ,P 146-501-03 MELTON, HENRY 146-501-10 N, HERMAN J 04-007 5441 DIAMOND OR 04-007 /"16171 ANGLER LN 04-007 162S1 AN tSR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINST No CAL 92647 I4146-494-24 FITTS, CHARLES E' 146-SOI-04 MC NAMARA,�JHN JOSEPH 146-502-01 FO , EDDIE "'ttiO4-007 5451 DIAMOND OR 04-007 16181 ANGGLN 04-007. O1 WIND OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, C 9264.9 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 " UNTINGT BCH, CAL 92647 i; 146-494-25 'SCOTT, MERRIIL G 146-502-05 .NAKAIlj�AMA, BERT S 146-502-02 MORTON, RO RT A 1 iO4-007 b461 DIAMOND OR 04-007 16203!-ANGLER .LN 04-007 6(022 SOf IND OR l. 1 HUNTINGTON DEACHr '92647 HUNYINGTH BC CAL 92647 HUNT TN BCH, CAL 92647 146-494-26, CATES, LINDA 146-501406 CHAAROIH,_ DONALD R 146-502- CHEEKi ROBERT 04-007' 26912 COACH LN 04-q07 16211 ANGL R LN 04-007 SOFTWINO OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTING EACH, CA 92647 146-494-27 DOWDS, SCOT R 146-5 f-D�RITZ. LIFFORD A. 146-502-04 ROBE, O�NALD B 04-007 16922 COACH LN 0 -007 -16221 ANGLEi� LN_ _ 04-00 6051 SOFTWIHO OR h HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTI TN BCH, 92646 URTTNPIT CAL 92647, ' !�Mr: , i.. .- •'fir. ' fur it .. ' •1t'.,, , ;L. 1 � . ' 1, ' _ ,�' , ,I', I ^o._ i i _.... j :• ,. i•i' • j•'••�' t't: ' �•r! t'. '{I+.f ''. ,. . ,. .. ,r ,• •1, ;'. 1',, ' ',r I '''!` 1' 1` r,: f i' '.!.I'rl. w�,.,l' .J ' 1., l7�+'., .;.',,1 �? 'j ,,,_l ,,,1' .,,. ' I '1,1''rl'1, I �i'y tr' y, a•'I.. , .�• 11 if r ., ' 'r i�f b: + •�', � ,� i�i I � �1�I+�Id�'Ni,��c+�l 1. � 1 I• -i (1 ' k� {I t " ii+4iA+46+4 '• IT ;+Fiel� I DZ3TRZCT NUMBERt lf4A ;,MU NGTON BlACM CITT f •t ; I 'fit. ;� .i I, I. :��,,,,, ,• �, '.��r.l. �r,,,., y�,�. I >'r ' • , '' .1 �, � �•1•,Ir' 111 �,• ;i IJ , �il�r `7 r'1' 1 'f•;,�'M '1 PARCEL.NO/ OWNERS `1 '' ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP `,PARCEL NO/ IOWN[RS 1r ;•ZIP t• 7RA NAME AND,ADDRESS CODE TRA. „ -NAME,NANO ADDRESS CODE 'L• ''' TRA;, I HAM[ AND•AOORESS C009 J 1 '146-601-EO gUINl. RICHARD V 'I / 144-601-27• WINCMICA COMMUNITY HATE � 146-601-34 H A T PROPERTIES i'1, ' 04-007 -2200 PARK NEWPORT i401`/// • 04.-007 1 CO �' 1 04-007 366E KATELLA AVE '; r`•'' ' •1' 'NEWPORT BEACH# CAL 92660 BOLSA CHICA WATER CO ' ''v '.'.I, ;,,• i LOS ALAMITO39. I ✓ '' .90720 1' P 0 Box 103 SUNSET BEACH. CAL 9074E , !146-601-21 'NORTON. IRENE M 146-601-28 OPPOLZER. LAVENA ✓ 146-601-3S HSU. ROBERT Y M M .. 04-007, 20661 SUBURBIA lN • 04-007 %KASTER. ROBERT F 04-007 87S PROSPECT PL HUNTINGTON BEACH. ,CA 92646 P 0 BOX 510 'u COSTA MESA, CA 92616 ' YREKA. CA 96097 '146-601-22 OVIATT# JOEL P / 146-601-29 CROSSLEY, SIDNEY A "146-601-34 NATION. JEWELL 04-007 4812 HERHANSON CIR / 04-007 1055 ROSE AVE 04-007 . 4802 CURTIS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACHr C 92649 PALM SPRINGS. CAL 192262 �, HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 ; I qt146-601-23'LAW# JAN 146-601-30 BREUER-HARRISON INC 146-601-37 NATION. JEWELL 04-007 ' '16811 ROOSEVELT ST 04-007 BREUER, C J 04-007 480E CURTI3 CIR ',;,'.;.•' . HUNTIN4TON BEACH. CA 92649 1 1750 LAOERA VISTA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 •• r ' FULLERTON, CAL 92631 .146-601-24 NERIO. MASAO 146-601-31 CROSSLEY. SIDNEY A 148-011 01 STATE OF LIF DEPT OF 04-007 ,' 9340 SOLSA AVE 04-007 1055 ROSE AVE ' 04-001 UBLU'HORKS }IF WESTMINSTER, CAL 92683 PALM SPRINGS# CAL 92262 .146-601-25 CHAH6# ENRIQUE G 144-601-32 BANK# ORANGE CITY 148-011-02 MILLS l i WATER CO "iO4-007 •3922 SIRIUS OR 04-007 2730 E CHAPMAN AVE 04-001 WYNN. ARO G , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 { ORANGE. CA ' 92669 417 HILL ST STA 924 LOS ANGELE . CAL 90013 146-601-16 WALTER. DONALD B TR 146-601-33 VAUGHN. ROBERT G 1 8-011�3 ORANGE CO ODD � 04-007 .•,17131 SANDRA LEE LN 04-007 1137 E BALBOA BLVD 04-0 CONTROL DIET k HUNTINGTON BEACH. C 92647 BALBOA ISLAND. CA 92661 ih'1 '�. •'i f 015IRICT, NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH. CI�Y ! F ffII' �r+' ..rr ,.r,.�rd,l , �.• ., Ilog-,., . .11,.•I. .. ��,� ..P bm T0.'I.."110F.+n,' ,•,Nr. 4 tr^fa7M, PARCEL NO/ OWNERS 2IP PARCEL Nb/ ,+ OWNERS ZIP + . PARCEL NOTE'. OWNERS'• ZI TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS .. ' CODE �TRA NAME,AHO'AODRESS COD '939-331-07 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-331-14 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO' ( 939-331-22 KING. RONALO 0 "4 04-007 %WESTF.IELD DEV 'CORP 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 4852 TIARA DR t201 .� c�r• �+ 17802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 ", 17602 SKY PARK CIR 9104 "•' ' ��'; HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ' IRVINE, CA 92714 IRVINE► CA 92714'; ' 939-331-08 TOWNSEND, ALVIE C 939-331-15 KRISLOCKr KONDELIA E 939-331-22 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 04r007 4852 TIARA OR 9101 04-007 4872 TIARA OR 9102 04-007. %WESTFIELO DEV CORP HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 17802 SKY PARK CIR 4104 IRVINE, CA 927 4 r •939-331-09 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-331-16 FORD, MARK 939-331-23 PAVLOVICH, ROBERT J 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 4842 TIARA OR 9204 04-007 4852 TIARA OR 8203 17802 SKY PARK ,CIR 1104 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA' 92649 IRVINE. CA 92714 939-331-10 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-331-17 ENGSTROM, KENNETH C 939-331-24 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO A: 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007" 4842 TIARA OR 1201 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP u 17802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 HUNTINGTON BEACII, CA 92649 17802 SKY PARK CIR 9104 4 }. I. IRVINE,' CA 92714 i IRVINE, CA 92714 939-331-11 WEISCHEDEL, JOSEPH D 939-331-18 SPENCER, MITCHELL H 939-331-25 ANTOYAN, 'ALLEN JR ' ,o I ' ' 04-007 4862 TIARA DR 8102 04-007 4842 TIARA DR 8202 04-007 16932 CORAL CAY LN e HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 4 �t, .939-331-12 MORITA. MATT 939-331-19 ARAGON, RALPH T 939-331-26 RENKUS, SHARI L 04-007 4872 TIARA OR 8103 04-007 4842 TIARA DR 8203 04-007 4862 TIARA DR 2202 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 I. ,."939-331-13 OENNING, SHERI R 939-331-20 WEED► NANCY J 939-331-27 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO { 04-007 4872 TIARA DR 1146 04-007 4852 TIARA DR #204 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP HUNTINGTOM BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON'BEACH, •CA •. . 92649 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104 �: IRVINE, CA 92714: .01.l A 1, l 111/J1Lt X• 0?p A 1UNTINGTON 6EAC11 CITYi ' � '•' ��: •�� , ' •tt n "IrAkCE L. NO/ UNNERS ZIP PARCEL NO^ik.vm"rw,, OWNERS ^1"'T;11 �• '" f f ,ZIP p1tRClL NO/' " 'AWNLits ZIP i TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 'f,. TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COOS TRA NAME ANO A005S " N`Ca0 939-330-39•KERR, WILLIAM STUART h939-330-51 ENGDAHL. GEORGE P I 939-330-58 OE' JOHN."ANTHONT'I''` 1,xh,, 04-010 8571 MERLE CIR 04-007 4752 TIARA OR i102 04-007 4782 TIARA• OR 8104•.' 1'i' ' rd.;41p HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 I 'HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ' HUNTINGTON BEACH,:'CA ,'.. 92649( 939-330-40 B t G PROPERTIES LTD ° 939-3;30-52 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-330-59 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO •.r ! '1~'i: 04-010 7652 SLATER AVE 18 ! 04—Q07 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-001 %WESTFIELD BEV CORP :! �; • HUNTINGTON BEACH,; CA 92647 N 17802 SKY BARK CIR 8104 , i' 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104 IRVINEr CA 92714 IRVINEP,CA 9.2714 ; 939-330-41 B t G PROPERTIES LTD 939-330-53 HAYES, VIRGINIA M 939-330-60 SMITH, FRANK E -"04-010 7652 SLATER AVE 98 04-007' 4752 TIARA DR 1104 04-007.' 4782 TIARA OR 1102 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . 939-330-428 t G PROPERTIES LTO �' 939-330-54 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-330-61 HOGAN, KATHLEEN M 04-010 . 7652 SLATER AVE 18 "i 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 4782 TIARA OR 1103 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647' j 17802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 IRVINE, CA 92714 939-330-43 LAND-PLUS INC " 939-330-55 MISNERI ELDEN B 939-330-62 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 04-030 166 FLOWER ST Y 04-007 4762 TIARA OR 1102 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP COSTA MESA, CA 92627 '.. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104 IRVINE. CA 92714 .;939-330-44 LAND-PLUS INC :I . 939-330-56 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-130-63 PRESUTTI, MARY K 04-010 166 FLOWER ST 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 4792 TIARA DR 1102 COSTA MESA,- CA 92627 " 17802 SKY PARK CIR 9104 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ar c• IRVINE, CA 92714 7 r'S' +•3'"'h'S�'1tii�L..rN,. a• 'Y'.re,. ':`i �1" �., , .. .•r T;•',�;'' ' 939-330-50 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-330-57 STEIN, HAROLD 939-330-64 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 4772 TIARA OR 1102 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA, 92649 17802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 IRVINE, CA 92714 IRVINE. CA 92714 ' "'•'• I -� .w».�•-,r: �Il.l1., .�:....�w ;'j ,.,I r„�.,,,, •q••n!t'.,^T!t'�'r`•. „� ,.�.,�.,fi rr:•lrr'.t�'!� �: . • , I �yav�+'M1lA,�'M�,w" tira'xt4o7YCTAI' y' DISTRICT NUM+DER: 054A HUNTINGTON BE CITY „ I y,•�, �40WHERSJ. ZIP ':•''PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP + PARCEL NO/ ' OWNERS ZIPI �• vy TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE �, TRA NAME AND ADDRESS ' ' CODE TRA {' NAME AND ADDRESS COOED, �t� 939-331-28 DOCCHIO, RALEIGH A 939-480-04 THE SCHUHRKE FAMILY TRUST 939-480-11 PCSC INC . 04-007 4872 TIARA OR $203 '+a 04-001 23022 BERING SEA OR I' 04-001''. 20321 EASTW000 CIR ,t -HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 j I 'LAGUNA HIGUELr CA 92677 HUNTINGTON BEACHr. # CA 9262P {, J,1 I' „ .. '. 1'4'j:. i,.f r'n, I •', .. 939-331-29 SMILANICH, ELENA A 939-480-OS CARLSBERG DEVELOPMENT CO, is 939-480-1i KRAUS► GENE 04-007 4872 TIARA OR 1204 �,f04-001 2800 28TH ST 2N0 FLOOR ! 04-001 P 0 BOX. 1731 1. t. HUNTINGTOH BEACH, CA 92649 SANTA MONICAr CA iI 90405 .HEMPORT;BEACH# ,CA.,. .926631 . 939-331-30 WALL, PAUL J 939-480-06 WICKSTROM, THOMAS L �, 939-480-13 CARLSBERG DEVELOPMENT CO 04-007 4872. TIARA OR 8201 04�001 21571 SURVEYORS CIR 04-001 2800 28TH ST ENO FLOOR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 SANTA MONICA, CA 190405 s 939-331-31 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-480-07 BRARr HARNEK S 939-480-14 CARLSBERG DEVELOPMENT CO 1, 04-007, %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 104-001 18889 CAPENSE ST 04-001 2800 28TH ST 2N0 FLOOR + I 17802 SKY PARK CIR 9104 FOUNTAIN VALLEY► CA 927.08 SANTA MONICA, CA 90405' q IRVINE, 'CA 92714 939-480-01 PETERSEN, DONALD M 939-480-08 BOUCHER, RAYMOND P 939-480-15 CARLSBERG DEVELOPMENT CO •,•04-001 2IS41 SURVEYOR CIR 04-001 %RADON CORP 04-001 2800 28TH ST ENO FLOOR HUNTINGTON BEACH#' CA 92646 ; 21611 SURVEYOR CIR SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 .939-480-02 M P M 939-480-09 MIORELLI, EMIL P 939-480-16 CARLSBERG DEVELOPMENT CO 04-001 ATTN RICHARD MOORE 04-001 9871 HOT SPRINGS OR 04-001 2800 28TH ST ENO FLOOR 415 PIRATE RO HUNTINGTON' BEACH, CA 92646 SANTA MONICA. CA 90405 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 ; 939-480-03 STUART, GARY 939-490-10 HONEY BAKED HAM INC . 939-480-17 CARLSBERG DEVELOPMENT CO 04-001 10172 THESEUS OR 04-001 P O BOX 5910 04-001 ATTN GLEN GESSFORO HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615 2800 28TH ST SUITE 200 y I SANTA MONICA, CA 9040S i,. • DIJIMICr NUMBLO: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ' 1 PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ;ZSP..,,,,,, PARCEI,NO/�,n,pes« par1BFGWNERS+r•�•+r:�?ncARW11rZ A RES C 0 RA•w,'+ .r►Y. ^f1AMEf'AND'�ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS C00 TRA ,N/1ME AND OD S Q �, , ,.,,•,,. T r' ' 191R:(r,tlr ` ?.{., 5.�:.v:1 r ..�• •„ :•'. i I;. • :.•r, f 939-330-6S COBLEIGH, CAROL I 939-330-72 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO " . 939-330-79 PARKS. DENNIS R "W 04-007 4802 TIARA DR 9101 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-001 4762 TIARA OR 8201 1 , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 1 17802 SKY PARK CIR 9104 .1, ", I HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9264 �• IRVINE. CA 92714 {} �• 939-330-66 COCKLEY, WENDY C 9391-330-73 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO „ ; 939-330-80.ANDERSON, DEBORAH ANN 04-007 4802 TIARA DR i102 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP I.. .;• 04-007 4762 'TIARA- DR 8202 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i 17802 SKY PARK CIR *104 r! "• ' ' '. HUNTINGTON BEACN.rCA '926.4 IRVINE. CA 1 92714' ? it , �y 939-330-67 HUTTO, SIGRID K 939-330-74 WEAVER, KENNETH SHERIDAN 939-330-82 SERRAO. VALERIE MARCEL r 04-007 4802 TIARA OR 8103 04-007 .47S2 TIARA OR 1201 04-007 ,; 4762* TIARA OR 0203 ' ;Y ,• HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649. HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9264 ;ri 939=330-68. WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939L330-75 NAUGHTON, JEAN 939-330.-82 PUTMAN,'CRAIG LEE 04-007 ":%WESTFIELD DEV' CORP 04-007 47S2 .TIARA OR i202 04-00.7 4772 TIARA OR UNIT 204 '17802 SKY PARK' CIR 1104 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649' 1 IRVINE, CA 92714 939-330-69 KLINGENSMITH, JACK B 939-330-76 DAILY, STEVEK R 939-330-83 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 1 04-007 4822 TIARA OR 1101 04-007 • 47S2 TIARA DR 9203 04-007 %WESTFIELD OEV CORP I HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 17802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 1 IRVINE, CA 9271 939-330-70 HOBLITZELL, JANE B 939-330-77 KUENZLER, ANDREAS HERBERT 939-330-84 DUREL, ARNOLD FRANCIS 3RD r 04-007 4573 CANDLEBERRY LN 04-007 TANNEICHENSTRASSE II 04-007 , 4772 TIARA OR 1202 "..SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 ST GALLEN 9010 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SWITZERLAND FOREI 939-330-71 RYERSON. JOYA 939-330-78 WALKER, ANTHONY 939-330-SS GROW, GLENN A - i 03 04 007 4762 TIARA DR 1204 04-007 GROW, GARY M I 04 007 4822 TIARA OR 1 • HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 4772 TIARA OR 8203 � 11 Z,1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926491 .. 1 ,�'q,t.`. .. I � ,I •N I, - •+: f ,•17r•.'.,,•r , r. , !'..•., Ir• +5•«'�:, !'C i J`{ �'. '^i pr;r, .v�,Rl..r� ,re•..�' .i).j... ,n Lei .-�' I' *!'�n"d9I�•q�.n` $ll�� i.;e:.rfor. rn;�`r�i 000s:v♦ 09'-21-86 1020t nn 19oS-aA CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST 1 ' }A8L 70S,p�` DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ' " PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP 4 TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE. 146-155-17 BROAOHEAO, GEORGE E 146-155-24 MARTIN► WILLIAM E 146-155-31 SMITH. LENORE 04-007 S632 MIOOLECOFF OR 04-007 5712 MIODLECOFF OR 04-007 5641 HEIL AVE HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 146-155-18 KINCAID, DONALD G 146-155-25 LEWIS► PAUL S JR 146-155-32 MITCHELL, GORDON W " .04-007 5642 MIOOLECOFF OR 04-007 5711 HEIL AVE 04-007 5631 HEIL AVE HUNTINGTN 'BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-155-19 KLINNEAM, PONGTEP 146-155-26 HAMILTONr JOSEPH L E 146-ISS-33 DEESr FRANKLIN E 04-007 6243 MONITA ST 04-007 5701 HEIL AVE 04-007 5611 HEIL AVE LONG BEACH, CA 90803 HUNTINGTN BCH* CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN. SCH, CAL 92649 146-155-20 AANESTAO, WILHELM C 0 146-155-27 HAWTHORNE, GEORGE M 146-lS5-34 ASH► JOSEPH 04-007 5662 MIDDLECOFF OR 04-007 5691 HEIL AVE a 04-007 ' 5601 HEIL AVE HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL . 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 146-155-21 ALEX, PAUL J 146—ISS-28 WAKEFIELD, CONSTANCE V S + 146—ISS-35 LUND, ROBERT E 04-007 5672 MIDDLECOFF OR 04-007 5671 HEIL AVE !: 04-007 5591 HEIL AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, ,CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 926491 HUNTINGTH BC11, CAL 92649 146—ISS-22 PERRY, CLYDE W 146-155'-29 LOCKARO, SAMUEL E !i 146-155-36 LARSON, CHARLES R 04-007 5692 MIODLECOFF OR 04-007 5661 HEIL AVE 04-007 SS81 HEIL AVE HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649, 146-155-23 ASPINALL, ROBERT MAYNARD 146-155-30 LIVERNASH, JAMES D " 146-15S;37 WALLACE, JAMES N JR , 04-007 . TR 04-007 5651 HEIL AVE 04-007 5561 HEIL AVE 164S1 HARBOUR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926441 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 f it .. • I '�' i , - '. �, � �-,�i 1,11. .. _ •'1 • .. 1 ,I ... ...`.,,, �i 1' �,• ••y� M.�i,::} Ik• .t.i ,r• : .. riit'IK3 `��b!o',';11ffiYJ1!1 ?[n�CSjt'Y►;.. 1ti • b"�l ;,. , .'I 'I,',I �,, r i•1. , r�i„�!1 . '•, :1�rh..�4�i , •j;�jtli7i . ' �8 �sole IM'.QTL!0061t1• ' 1l-ti-1• lA•oa ►w agws-iw' asirioswrwsar PwRuL LisT ,� `�' ,1 11 .% y 'i li,{� 1 •i'''F' ;:,`MAO< ; 70• PARCEL•.NO A OWNERS �. ZIP PARCEL ,NO/ OWNERS ZIP' f}' 'PARCEL NO/ k . -;.OWNERS I .; ZIP TRA NAM! AND ADDRESS C00! TRA NAME AND ADORES$ CODE TRA HAM! AND ADDRESS zip " .'u _. ; r, „ t: '• ' ' �i{,r. � .tip ..:L, 146-154-06 M 00 • BILLY C 146-155-03 T000• STEPHEN' P I: �, L46-155-10 04.007 164 1 IRDIE' LN 04-007 16391 EAGLE LN 04-007 . I ;i , ti i HUNT TON BEACH* CA ; 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH. CAL 92649 , �••�M1a,�� Ir. I'., 46-154-07 KULL. REGORY S 146-1S5-04 MC OONNELL. PAUL J 146-155- 1 LA MORTE. RONAUO T 04r007 16401 IRDIE LN 04-007 16401 EAGLE LN ' 04-007 556! MIODLECOf OR HUHTIN TON BEACH. CA 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9264P HUNTINGTH BCH. CAL . " 92649 1464'154-08 WHITA R. CLARK, N 146-155-OS HEPNER. W CRAIG ; 146-155-12 AVIS. GEORGE 04-007 16391 BIROIE LN 04-007 16411 EAGLE LN 04-007 5 82 MIDDLE C0 F OR HUNTI GTON BEACH, CA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACHr, CA 92649 ' H HTINGTON B CH.CAL 92649I 146-155-06 ARITA. JAHES M 6-155-13 OEPT OF VET AFFAIRS OF 146-154-09 WILLI MS. PETER J ffff+ 14 ' i 04-007 •' 26381 BIRDIE LN 04-007: 16421 EAGLE LN J 04-007 STAT OF L ' f 1't HUNT11 GTOH BEACH. CA" 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 ' SPICE . RI ARD L . I' 5592 M OOL OFF OR •1 ! HUNTIN TN CH. CAL 92649 46-154-10 GENOV SE• ROSS JOHN', 146-1S5-07 ATLAS. LAURENCE DANIEL' ' 146-155-14 SMITH. J ET' 04-007 16371 IRDIE LN 04-007 S512 MIDDLECOFF OR 04-007 5602 M10 ECOFF DR HUNTI TON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGT BEACH• CA 91649 . 146-155-01 BOATWRIGHT. DAMES R' 146-ISS-08 WILSON. RICHARO A �, 146-155-15 MR CECIL B 04-007 3606 GRANADA AVE 04-007 9531 SCOTSTOUN OR a 04-007 5612 DOLECO F OR i I' ••. BAKERSFIELO• CA 93309 HUNTINGTH BCH. CAL 92646 HUNT GTN BCH. CAL 92649 I i 146- 55-09 A ROW PETER P JR 146-1S5-16 L NEN FRANK I 146 15S 02 JOYCE• BRIAN J 1 B T . E ER . ` 04-007 16381 EAGLE LN 04-007 SS42 MIDDLECOFF OR 04-007 MBDEN. STEVEN P ET AL HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH► •CAL 92649 622 MIODLECOFF OR UNTINGTON BEACH. 92649 ' r n'ii •a "`� :'i't'i '��' "wi'15i:i�''�4r:�':'{•.:s.Dn�l�.•k•-.� J i.IR+b . ASP oe. •1',. I• .`t�f'i 1 t I: '' ,7 M' }4 AC6:J301:7T1 CTL 0005298 05-21-86 10:01 PM 1965—e6. ''CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST ''• ' h'''• ."r '. .'y'••''�6 PAGE 704I,�� DISTRICT NUMBER 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY71 PARCEL NO/�� '" r OWNERS ZIPsr PARCEL' NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/. OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE NTRA 'NAME -AND ADDRESS CODE TRA ;i NAME AND ADDRESS CODE f'� 146-154-06 MAODOX9 BILLY C i 146-155-01 TODD, STEPHEN P 146-155-10 MATUCK, OONALO F • + ' 04-007 16411 BIRDIE LN p4-007 16391 EAGLE LN 04-007 S5S2 MIDDLECOFF OR •' HUNTINGTON BEACHr' CA 92649 HUHTINGTN SCHr CAL' 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-154-07 KULL, GREGORY S 146-155-04 MC DONNELL, PAUL J .146-1SS-11 LA MORTE, RONALD T 04-007. 16401 BIRDIE LN 04-007 16401 EAGLE LN 04-007 SS62 MIDDLECOFF OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL' 92649 I. =.146-154-08 WHITAKER, CLARK W 146-155-05 HEPNER, W CRAI6 146—ISS-12 DAVIS, GEORGE V 1, 04-007 16391 BIRDIE LN • 04-007 16411 EAGLE LN 04-007 5582 MIDDLECOFF OR HUNTINGTON BEACH; CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAL 92649 ' •146—lS4-09 WILLIAMS. PETER J 146-155-06 ARITA, JAMES M 146—ISS-13 DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF 04-007 16381 BIRDIE LN 04-007 16421 EAGLE LN 04-007 STATE OF CAL HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUHTINGTN BCHr CAL 92649 SPICER, RICHARD L 1.. 5S92 MIDDLECOFF OR HUNTINGTN BCH, .CAL ' 92649 146-154-10 GENOVESE, ROSS JOHN 146-1S5-07 ATLASr LAWRENCE DANIEL 146-155-14 SMITHr JANET 04-007 16371 BIRDIE LN 04-007 5512 MIDOLECOFF OR 04-007 5602 MIDDLECOFF OR HUNTItGTON BEACH, CA 92649 �: HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 146-15S-01 BOATWRIGHT, DAMES R 146-155-08 WILSON9 RICHARD A 146-155-15 WRIGHT. CECIL B 04-007 3608 GRANADA AVE 04-007 9531 SCOTSTOUN OR 04-007 S612 MIDDLECOFF OR BAKERSFIELD, CA 93309 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92646 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 146-155-02 JOTCE, BRIAN J 146-15S-09 BATROW, PETER P JR 146—lSS-16 LEINEN, FRANK I 04-007 16381 EAGLE LN 04-007 5542 MIDDLECOFF OR 04-007 LAMBOEN, STEVEN P ET AL HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL , 92649 S622 MIDDLECOFF OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 fN C!1. coos:96 0S-21 -86 10:01 PM 191SS-66 CITT/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE -D.ISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY! PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP ' ', TPA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS ' CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 146-152'-01 BOYER, RALPH F JR 146-152-08 BROWN, ALBERT S 146-153-06 ATKINS, ELLT 04-007 5631 MARSHALL OR 04-007 5711 MARSHALL OR 04-007 5642 MARSHALL DR HUIITIIIGTH BCH, CAL' 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 .. • .I 146-152-02 BAILEY, SHERWOOD V 146-152-09 MARGISON, LAURENCE 6 146-153-07 BENDA, ROT MELVIN TR " 04-007 5641 MARSHALL OR 04-007 5721 MARSHALL OR 04-007 5652 MARSHALL OR HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH* CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649''..' 146-152-03 MARTIII, ROCK g146-153-01 BACCA, ROBERT W 146-153-08 HOLLY, RICHARD If 04-007 5651 MARSHALL DR it 04-007 16371 ACE LN ;+04-007 5662 MARSHALL OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649" HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92649 r•y HUHTI14GTON BEACH, CA 92640' `146-152-04.WELLS, MAURICE B 146-153-02 KLOPIEN, CLAUDIA L ( 14�6-153-09 SACHS, BYOON P 04-007 5661 MARSHALL DR i� 04-007 16381 ACE LN >04-007' 5672 MARSHALL OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649ti1' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 i HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL" 92649 146-152-05 LEE, DORIS A "i t 146-153-03 PEKICH, TONE R i 146-193-10 TAYLOR, RICKEY E ` •. ', 04-007 5671 MARSHALL DR � 04-007 ' 5612 MARSHALL DR ' ' �,04-007 5692' MARSHALL DR , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649?; HUNTINGTN BCH*, CAL 9264,9 . HUNTINGTN BCH* ;AL 92649 'a 1 } ' 146-152-06 ROUDOH, JAMES R e',t 146-1S3-04 LAMBERT, 'LAWRENCE E ••1, 6-153-11 BERGMAN* CHRIS ALLEN' 04-007 5681 MARSHALL DR ��t 04-007. 5622 MARSHALL OR I'04-007 ' 5702 MARSHALL OR ..' ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, 'CA 92649. :` I r HUNTINGTON-BEACH, CA w 92649, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92649., ,. ,I � e•f� I I ,r "¢i«i�4"1Ct1=1ty'it'S'nat,,t'7�'r�tTl'•aiR9'A1SFi t I. M.�•�,'l . 146-152-07 PULIDO, RALPH 146-153-OS KEEL* A B 146-153-1L SELLERS, EVERETT M 04-007 5701 MARSHALL DR ! 04-007 P 0 BOX 485 I 04-007 5712 MARSHALL DR ' HUNTINGTN BCH, GAL HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HAWTHORNE, CA 902SI 92649,. I' f7 OS-21-86 10801 PM 1969-86 : CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST,, � PAGE 703{' �1 •` N ..,.,.,i �.q,. w :pA�'p�., qFM I .,I.ti. •. 4" �I.CVYr� Z - BAR:OAA'�w+axu"HUN��NAON~BEACH CITY u'PAR ZI NO/ :OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS , ZIP ;! PARCEL NO/ OWNERS A NAME AND ADDRESS COOE TRA NAME AND. AOORESS :° CODE ,; TRA ! ' , NAME;•AND ADDRESS CO 146-153-13 PERLMUTTER, JEFF 146-153-20 DEPT OP VETS AFFAIRS OF `�,. . '"146-153-L7 BARLOW, DAHIEL ! 04-007— $711 MIDDLECOFF OR 04-007 STATE OF CAL 1' 04-007 '1638L BIRDIE LN ., ; +, n ;• ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 3252 RUTH ELAINE OR ' 1 ,1 ' 1•;-' HUNTINGTON BEACMr CA 926 LOS ALAMITOSi CA 90790 1y ...146-153-14 GILMANr CARL L �'` 146-153-21 HENDRICKS, MART ELLEN 146-153-28 BREEN. DENNIS W i� 04-007 S701 MIODLECOFF OR i 04-007 5621 MIDDLECOFF DR 04-007 8481 DALLAS CIR HUNTINGTOH BEACH.' CA 92649 { HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9264 41146-153-15 HAWK. ERNEST F / 246-153-22 FRAKES9 LARRY G 146-154-01 CROSS. ROBERT L' .. �+_d�•;;r04-007 5691 MIDDLECOFF DR 04-007, 5611 MIDDLECOFF OR 04-007' . 16372 EAGLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649;It HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL 92649 Yy, 1. ,. � . ;'146-153-16 SCHWAB, ANTHONY J ,j 146-153-23 LOPEZ, RICHARD 146-154-02 VAUGHAN, KENNETH M i 04-007•• •5671 MIDOLECOFF OR ;r 04-007 5601 MIDOLECOFF OR 04-007 16382 EAGLE LN i`•HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649- HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 ' ,,r f":'.T.Y;wl'rr�,^�_.,,, �r v:n•. .... .vt,Tb►r1', .. �, r '146-153-17 SWENSEN, LYMAN KNUTE 246-153-24 VOSBURG, IRA E JR 1 46-154- 3 0,,1 0 E R. 04-007 . ;'•5661 MIODLECOFF OR 04-407 16412 BIRDIE LN �� 04-007 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 • HUNTINGTON BEACHoCAL 92649 '� 146-153-18 WEIR. DONALD R 4'.146-153-L5 BAKERS RICHARD G 146-154- �. - _ 04 007 , 5651 MIDDLECOFf OR ,r. 04 007 16402 BIRDIE LN :;, 04-007 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 TOM • 1 146-153-19 HATSLETTEr RONALO •'146-133-26 SCOPELLETI. CARMEN TR . fin 146-154-0 �1-1 04-007 5641 MIODLECOFF DR 1'.1 04-007 16392 BIRDIE LN 04-007 i ��'.�•" HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,,CA 92649 01. to C 7 ..... , , `'1'� .I i .•I'• '�.,�,wYw/>:;►w' 'M�. r �.� .I�• � � � ,'I ,. p ♦..r .,.Iw.,.•.w ....... oar..0•-rwtcr —w Sc 61OT , , FAO! 676 �i�"DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY 1,:tl�:PARClL NO/,` OWNER] I ZIP PARCE 0/. OWNER] ZIP if NO/ OWNERS ZIP' ,; '3 ;1•,TRA q .' \NAM!/AHO ADDRESS COD! TRA NAM! AND �!]S CODE TRA NAM! AND ADDRESS COOL ,/ :'r'�146-061-08 A B JACOBS i ASSOCIATES 146-062-03 TRANr 1 F 146-062-10"HARIr' lOWARO fi 7'• '••`P O BOX,65S O4-007 16302 HOLLY 04-007 16372 HOLLYWOOD LN LACUNA St"Cr CA', 92652 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 lip r4,�.1..1'i i � I 4t75ir•R� '^ � L. r • 146-061 9 A B JACOBS &' ASSOCIATES 146-062-04 KARLOVICHr 'RAYMONO GEORGE 146-062-11 0 DRISCOLL• ALPHONSUS�/ 04-007 P 0 BOX 655 O4-007 16312 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 16382 HOLLYWOOD LN +.' LACUNA BEACH► CA 92652 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 9164 .: {146-061-10 MIL'LERr BILLYr/J 146-062-05 OANKHERr 6ERAL0 146-06i-12 SPENCER► DALE F YYY 04-007 8904 SWORDFISH AVE 04-007 707 11TH ST ✓ 04-007 16731 TUNSTALL LN APT 1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CA 92708 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL . 92646 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 .��146-061-11 ANDERSON GORDON F 146-062-06 DEN. GERALD D / 146-062-13 DUGANr WALLACE :04-007 . 5351 MEA OWLARK OR 04-007 16332 HOLLYWOOD LN V 04-007 16412 HOLLYWOOD LH ''. HUNTINGTN\ CH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHrCAL 92649 AR MAR A — — 146-061-12 NOODW D K 146 062 07 BERNARD WI IA — r r LL M P 146-062 14 THOMPSONr JAMES A J p04-007' 5344' MEADOWLARK OR 04-007 16342 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 16422 HOLLYWOOD LN V H�1INGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. . 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-062-01 PITTALUGAr' JOSEPH A 146-062-08 CASTILLOr CARLO A 146-062-15 WILSONr WILLIAM N 04-007 . '16282 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 16352 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 5462 CALIENTE OR HUNTINGTON BEACHrCAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649• ! 146-062-02 Bei NZWEIG//Y EYMOUR L 146-062-09 FLOYDr LARRT W 146-062-16 KAUFMANr 'ANTON J04-007 ' .16292 HOLOOD LN 04-007 16362 HOLLYW000 LN 04-007 5452 CALIENTE OR HUNTINGTON BEACNP CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA ,92647 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL I 92649 • •'t` I r rll, 1` II .. 1 I i 'I.t.•'�1�; 11 f I. 4 I','It' •r ;.' j ` •i+i ,'�' { I�r�y�i�.'1a '�'' ,. i,', �. ` dl n i I r,1 GI r ' `� rl .� '�: 'ilr'.�.�`1jI'N�,f' .II' Ir' µ-�F�.I' �•y al�.)�irt�/j� � •, '�.,' .I�, ':� .., i i I' �1. t'-_,, .1. I.;I11 I .. •�Y,1 �,,• '�- Ir T{,'''Y�rf7 Syr�. � �I,.i,, , )4,� 1r !�p �� +r ■ Y�i 161i1j {.lr1l!l'Y.��,ir4„,, ,0ftll 0 + •rc .l.+ AC6IJ301/PH. CTL' 0005i71 05-21-86 10801 PH 1965-86 CITT/DISTRICT PARCEL, LIST SAC! 4 47T, 'S1•IDISTRICT NUMBERS 054A ^HUNTINGTON BEACH CITT lik riMPARCEL NO/ NN S, ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP -PARCEL NO/• OWNERS ZIP r AMI-AN �dA ~""�'" "r00?� ?gFp►NANI�IANO � 0 CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRES 000l i 1146-06t-17 FAULKNER. CHARLES W 246-062-24 WADE. THURMAN 8 ♦. �Y p " BELT. EOI If' k i4. is 04-007 .. 5432 CALIENTE DR I yr 04-007 5391 HEIL AVE w / * A34120C1. LH1, �'•. HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL v 92649 HUNTINGTON. BEACH. CA V 92649 INGT CN."CAL � `9'9t649 146-062-18 DE HERS. WALLACE H 146-062-25 FYHRIE, KATHLEEN V 146-0,�1� CAOUF .4MONTA. A*S. r 04-007 54t2 CALIENTE OR . / k 04-007 5401 HEIL AVE ✓ 04+0 kf2691LTAOLOW00 LNl �_WwFa► + : HUNTINGTON BEACH,' CA V 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 �.. .'iHUNjINOTN'BCH•:C ry� mp -11 I / ' 146-06Y-19 BRACHER. DENIS B i • 146-06�2-26 MC CLURE. OONAID G J . :.( 146-063-03 JACKSON. RANDAIL A '• 04-007 5412 CALIENTE OR 04-007 5411 HEIL AVE 04-007 16301 HOLLYWOOD LN HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH.CAL 92649' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 ,146-062-20 HOFFMAN, MARTIN L 146-062-27 FULTS. JON H j 146-063-04 FARREN, JOHN HOOD v 04-007. 5402 CALIENTE OR J 04-007 3914 MISTRAL OR V 04-007 2092t MISSION LN HUNTINGTN BCH• CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92646 146-062-21 WEBSTER. MABLE M L! 146-062-28 PRICE. ROBERT D J 246-063-05 FICK. BRIAN B j ~' 04-007 5392 CALIENTE DR 04-007 5431 HEIL AVE 04-007 16321 HOLLYWOOD LN k HUNTINGTN BCH. ,CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 . 146-062-22 FOSTER. CONSTANCE C J 146-062-29 AUSTIN, JERRY R 146-063-06 PETERSON. ESTHER E TR 04-007. 5362 CALIENTE OR 04-007 5451 HEIL AVE , 04-007 16331 HOLLYWOOD LN t� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 99649 146-062-23 NICHOLS.. R08ERT 8 146-062-30 IHNEN. BEHRENO H 146-063-07 BOSWELL, GLEN 0 '',' 04-007 5361 HEIL 'AVE 04-007 5471 HEIL AVE 04-007 ' 16341 HOLLYWOOD LN 'r'kit,'. HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 q HUNTINGTON BEACH.CAL. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH.•'CA " 92649fi '• ,' 1 .. 1 . n ,1 t'. .(�.ti�lb�''� e'}�''�!r Ij * ' }JJ.5Rr '� •1• j � I � 1 . ,i r ' ,.., `1' •�'r, + 'i•: i�f r �`,1 •I"'J i tip � r'., , , ;+ , i i. rl• i�'„ r �,,.i ,. i z.� •j 11 r,�• 1' , �' .d�r i. i a, 11. I ' I ; 1, ,' I. ', 1 '' •',•�• 4i•Y,� :j'1.Lw�..l.-.�-.,i,� ,rt44 ee •�-r�-ee iee1 .n t�es•es CIT1.101stRlcr PARCEL L1S1 { ,..I DISTRICT NUIIOER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY 1„ PARCEL NO/ OWNERS 2IP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS LIP�'1 TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CCOE:I 146-145-25 RIODER, CHARLES ,RANDAL 146-147-01 GRANGER, GEORGE 'W '146-147-08 NELSON. LARRY G 04-007 5751 YENTURI DR 04-007 5632 VENTURI OR 04-007' 5702 VENTURI OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 146-145-26 SCOLASTICO. CHARLES 146-147-02 SURLS, RONALD J 246-147-09 VILLALOBOS. RAFAEL G " 04-007 SALVATORE 04-007 5642 VENTURI DR 04-007 5712 VENTURI OR 5761 YENTURI OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,' CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i 146-145-27. HOLLINGSWORTH. ORVILLE 1467147-03 ANIIS, STANLEY 146-147-10 OE BAND. ANTHONY R.04-007 GRAt4T 04-007 17530 SANTO DOMINGO CIR I 04-007 5722 VENTURI' DR 5771 VENTURI OR FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CA 92708 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-146-01 LETVA, LEE B 146-147-04 COBB. RUEL W E 146-147-11 BORUCKI. LEON J 04-007• 16342 BIRDIE LN 04-007 '5662 VENTURI OR 04-007 5742 VENTURI OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 j HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926490 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAL 92649 V. 146-146-02 ROBERTS, WILLIAM G JR �146-147-05 AAGAARD. JEFFREY D '. 146-147-12 'CULLINANE, DANIEL * 04-007 ' : 16352 BIRDIE LN 04-007 5672 VENTURI OR 04-007 575Z VENTURI OR HUNTINGTON BEACH.CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-146-03 WILSON, THOMAS J 146-147-06 OUELLETTE. ANDRE S 146-147-13 KOLLMAN. DONALD 04-007 16151 ACE LN ? 04-007 5662 VENTURI OR 04-007 5762 VENTURI OR HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649.: HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-146-04. DILLENBECK, JOYCE 146-147-07 KINGHORN, ARCHIE 146-147-14 JOROAN, HAROLD M 04-007 6081 ANNETTE CIR '�, 04-007 5692 VENTURI OR 04-007 5772 VENTURI OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 :' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92645 •ce:JJol/fH CrL 000529Z 05-21-86 10:01 PM 1985-86 CITY/DISTRICT ,PARCEL , LIST PAGE 696 ! DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITT PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE ; TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 146-141-07 POGUE, JAMES E 146-142-07 CRAFT, JAMES 246-142-14 SHELDON* CHRIS 04-007 16261 EAGLE LN 04-007 26292 SERENADE LN 04-007, 16191 BIRDIE LH HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264.9.1`�' - .. i ,iWIr�P,�rlYr��►a"!F; -'V��I A w..i •r i 146-142-01 MAGGART. ROBERT J 146-142=08 ADAMS, CHARLES F JR 146-143-01 BREESE, JACK A 04-007 16192 EAGLE LN 04-007 16261 BIRDIE LN 04-007 16281 EAGLE LN ark ' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL. , 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 1 • HUN7IN6TN BCH, CAL92649.,: ' 146-142-02 ZANIBONI, ROBERT A 146-142.09 KARIMOTO, DEREK H S 246-143-02 NERY, RICHARD P 04-007 16212 EAGLE LN 04-007 16251 BIRDIE LN f 04-007 .16291 EAGLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-142-03: SHAFER9 LANCE 146-142-10 HAYNES, THOMAS G 3RD j 146-143-03 MARTIN, JOHN F . 04-007 . 16222 EAGLE LN 04-007 16241 BIRDIE LN f 04-007 16301 EAGLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 v HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 . . 146-142-04 GEIGER, CLAYTON P 146-142-11 SANOSTROM, NORMAN 0 II,[[' 146-143-04 HARRIS, MARION M :`04-007' ' 26232 EAGLE LN 04-007 16231 BIRDIE LN i`'I 04-007 16321 EAGLE LN j . 'HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 '146-142-05 AYERS, KEITH N 146-142-12 CAVANAUGH, ELSIE L 146-143-05 ENGLISH, MARJORIE C 04-007 16242 EAGLE LN 04-007 16221 BIRDIE LN ? -04-007 16331 EAGLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 926t9 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649. i 146-142-06 COOPER, NORMAN L ; 146-142-13 CARROLL, EDWARD S F. 146-143-06 WHITMORE. 'JAMES MARCUS 04-007 16252 EAGLE LN 04-007 16211 BIRDIE LN 1 04-007 16341 EAGLE LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNT INGTOH BEACH, CA 9264, . HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 :62J301/FM CTL 0003293 ON-8l-8s ,A&.ws rn• (VON-ao 6XrriossTRICT PARCEL LIST. (STRICT HUMBERT 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY " , f. I •fie,\••,Y .,y, t.i.,1..1A+-y.•. :.'tM^r....-:», i•,�.m ...,r.y�•h„YM•.,I:L...J y..,/.!M'�M�.w.r•!.. ARCEL'NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ 1 OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ ' OWNERS ZIP . IRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE IRA NAME AND, AOORESS CODE IRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE .46-143-07 �• A. i, 146-144-06 BONOMIP JOEL S 246-144-13 MOHTONENP PENTTI 04.007 04-007 16342 EAGLE LH 104-007 16321 BIRDIE LN HUNTINGTON BEACHip CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH$ CAL 92649 146-143-Oa7a�gvoMAq"� R .!f', . �! 146-144-07) WATKINS� RAYMOND H JR 146-144-14, HACGERTY, OANIEL J 04-007 04-007 ' � 16352 EAGLE' LN 04-007 I6301 BIRDIE LN Natt'A�t6xCA1� ! HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 . HUNTINGTH BCH. 'CAL 92649 !, r�rre+.w.wv1�'"'t''"y"/'r.'r'•+r'."'.wvw-�•, i , ; - .. ' - .��'1;' .�•' ' r K, .t, `.�� I ? 2! 1A6-144-01 DEPT QF VETS AFFAIRS OF 146-144-08 FLETCHER, CORET G 146-144-15 GALLAGHER* EAMON P { . ;.04-007 ' ,STATE' OF CAL 04-007 16362..EAGLE LN 04-007 ; .1 16291 BIRDIE 'LN 16282 EAGLE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH& CA, '9264,9 'id HUNTINGTH BC�, •CAL I t 92649,'.."; HUNTINGTON BEACHr' CA 92649 J• 1 ,., �. f ,' 1 , •�, ' •,J. ,tit 146-144-02 RTAN, GERARD B 146-144—.09 BAKUS. GERARD. J 146-144-16 JAMM' RICHARD E ,",•� 04-007 6262 FLINT OR 04-007. 16361 BIRDIE LH 04-007 16281 BIRDIE LH ! "r' HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCHo CAL 92649 HUHTINGTON BEACHvCAL 92647 r146 146-144-03 HARRELL. LUCILE H 146-144-10 THOMPSON, RALPH. L —145-01 'PARK.'NOEL E • 1.04-007 16302 EAGLE LN 04-007 1635I BIRDIE LN 04-007 1176 MAIN ST ,' HUNTINGTH BCHv CAL 92649 HUNTINGTH BCNP CAL 92649 IRVINE# CA t{ ►. 92714 '� •" ,1,46r-144-04 ROODEN. JAMES E 146-144-11 STARK, DAVID P 146-145-01 COURT11rYt LEE(ROBERT 04-007 '16322 EAGLE LN 04-007 16341 BIROlq LN ! 04-007 16222 BIRDIE LN �';;';"• , HUNTINGTON BEACHYCAL 92649 HUNTINGTON 8EACH,CAL 92649, HUNTIHRTON BEACH, CA 41649 ,,-146-144-OS NOTRICA, JOSEPH LEWIS 146-144-12 SHARPE, KEI7H H 146-145-03 6LADBACK. 6EORGENC ' 04-007 •16332 EAGLE LH 04-007 16722 INTREPID LN ' 04-007 •16232 BIRDIE LH 4•+, � HUNTINGTON BEACHo CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH.,CA 92647 (((( HUNNTINGTH BCH CAL ,'',. 92649 I,,q'AC62J302/rM CTL 0005169 09-12-86 30+01 PM 1908-86' CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 675. '� DISTRICT NUMBER: 05 ; 1 ERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP „ TRA ' NAME AND ADDRE33 CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRE33 CODA} TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE. ' 146-055-05 TICE, ARTHUR + v146-055-12 KENYON. ROBERT W J 146-061-01 CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH +' 04-007 '5312 CALIENTE OR / 04-007 5361 HEIL AVE 04-007 P 0 BOX 190 HUHTINGTN BCH, CAL V 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHo CA 9264 HUNTINGTH BCH o CAL 92648 •146-055-06 6IBSONo ROT L 146-056-01 BRAUN, LLOYD A 46-061-02 FIHICUM. JACK NI , ' 04-007 5302 CALIENTE OR / 04-007 5282 CALIENTE OR 04-007 5471 MEADOWLARK! OR l HUNTINGTON BEACHm CAV/ 92649 y HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BE tH.CAL 92649 + ' 146-055-07 LEKAVICH, FLORIAN L / 146-056-02 COX, KELVIN J . 146-061-03 LIVENGO00. TOM 04-007 '. 4872 OAHU OR 04-007 5272 CALIENTE DR 04-007 5461 MEAD LfARK OR' 'HUNTINGTN,BCH► CAL 92649 I HUNTINGTH BCH► CAL 926 HUNTINGTO EACH. CA 92649 IJ46-05S-08 NONAMAKER, DEAN N 146-056-03 MINCHINTONr 'DONALD MILNER I fi: 146-061-04. BONDE LAMONT1F ' 04-007 5311 HEIL AVE 04-007 3366 GUNDRY AVE i 04-007 .' 5441 'ADOWLARK OR HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 SIGNAL'HILL, CA 9080 HUNT N BCHv CAL 92649. 1146-055-09 MC HUGH. MICHAEL 0 V 146-056-04 MEYERSr SHIRLEY J 146-061-05 HIS* RY EARL 04-007 '' S331 HEIL AVE 04-007 7567 SUVA ST. ' 04-007 5 21 MEAD WLARK OR HUNTINGTON BEACH: CA 92649 DOWNEY# CA 90L 0 UNTINGTO BEACH CA 92649 146-055-10 WARD9 ALBERT H 146-056-05 STEEVESt BRIAN H J 1. 146-0 — 6 DETTLOFF9 ROBERT O � '�•'• - 1tiO4-007 5341 HEIL AVE 04=007 5271 HEIL AVE ' 04— 07 . '6832 'LAURELNURST OR HUNTINGTN'BCHs CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHo CA 9264 HUHTINGTN BCH CAL 19t647 146-055-11, WAR0v ALBERT H 146—OS6-06 SCOTT, VANOY T �. 146-061-07 SHEETSo ROBERT L, 04-007 • ' 5341 HEIL AVE 04-007 5281 HEIL AVE 04-007 17612 WHITFORD LH . HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 1 � HUNTINGTN BCHv CAL ,92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 �I[p��j7'��+��ry .�'��.:::' r.:"Js'T"•+'�'•4�'-i:i�.:c:-�li•1;,;,t�11� r t,•i�l� �Tl J' 7Sf�7Art't lti;�t, 1 �f�T•',^i l !�1 l:,}�'4• Ike ise • '.�, +t- �t. -ry, t t :-:2t ' 'I.TU R i1,aVA �i,l!-,:i.`1�i"X,:�� 7. �a5;.:styN��d�•iyl' N� AAA - 7�"rMi ► hy' ,' a _� t- ' '•• +'.R Sys" 7_ACff14JJ!0,�1/PMCTL OOOJ260 05-01-00 10201 PM 1965�86 C1TT/020TRSCT /ARC[L LIfT :,.Phil 471QISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY r �+}FARCE L NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA...:° NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA ' NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE ' 146 5i-'0 0830I' MENAf►EY,. CAR ROW ft Us, 146-053-0 I V ly 1-t-'04007 � 1 007 ;t 16i01' ARLYNGTON LN !_ 0q-007 A #� J'146-052-0 t/ � � �+D � 1 146-053-02 46-053-0 04-007 04-007 04-007 ! _ / 246-OSE-0 1 / 146-053-0, AT !�' is f 146-053-10 v D4-007 t+T� 04-007 ,n c 04-007 t 146-052-1 if 146-053-0 146-053-1 04-007 T' : .: 19t645 04-007 'eltyAllCl 04-007 I _ �e X46-052-1 - J 146-053-05�+pA 146-053-12 , 0fIt 04-007 tt#iii 04-007 04-007 pit 146-052— 1404-007 6*R J 146-053-1 04-007 04-007 aA 04-007 11��1 146-052-1341: .A.Ra 146-053-07 5 b 146-053-14 04-007 ; 04-007 16`3i 04-007 Ito. aar t �t. .... ' r {.:�'1 �!!0�� r�'Jlfilltti�}� y+y7, ' '� '•��•.;'ram A �kk��f7AWAi�� CSt lQl//{f CrL•' OOQ086T 08—ll-06 10801 PM 1962-86 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST• i, ',EASY N1 ISTRICT',NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL; NO/ OWNERS ZIP' - PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP �;i. .TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA, . NAME AND ADDRESS COOL 146-053-! 146-050-0 04-0 mum 146-oS3-1 / 146-053-2 146-054-0 r.•,04-007 1/ ,y,,,. 04-007 R� 04-007 W `'hi+146-053-1� A - Y z 146-053-24 ',MXZ 146-054-0 .04-007 DD S '1, t• °1 i1 04-007 q .. — — 4 — 46 1 6 054 0 ':•;.14'6 S 1 1 3 011 04-007 �,. .,., 04-007 9. �� ,�, 04-007 f•�6� M1flj}TIN� i.:c 4. NR U J a _ 4 — •146-053-19_ 41�6=OS3-26:FULCER. JAMES, H 2ND�; • 1 6 054 0 EY. QBE;� 04-007 ,' :-r-i, �04� 07J6r16LAL° OL{."�MAR�LitZyrt:' --••r,T,,.� 04-007 '''a,' NUNTINGTON:BEACH s- CA / `92649:- J r146-053-20 R �`� A� 04-007 146-054-01 SWEET, RONALD DAVIO 146-050-OS M 04-007 latB1. 0l.L" MAtl�LITt��•: i* 92 } - -� M t t h9�6'49 r ''i`HUNTINGTON BEACHr`CA�' `' 449''':i 146-053-2 d d�u ` -i�6�;b !1+b 7 K fA MA, 1404O 09 007 ,. r ,9 04-007 . b 4a. •..�; IJ1. ,M 111 0,0 01i•A 611. fl 00' 10.01 /n l�0• •• tfff/Yf•lwlll rAWLll Lll1 ' 1'�l.l tl. 51111Cf HUMBER: 054A HUfITINGTON BEACH CITY ` ARCEL HO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ i OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS " ZIP . TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 46-OS4-10 MORRIS, MATILDA B 146-054-17 HAYS, MICHAEL A 146-054-24 LONG, GARY C 04-007 16371 DEL MAR LN 04-007 16372 SANTA ANITA LN 04-007 16302 SANTA ANITA LN HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ;HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 ,46-054-11 LAMAS. ENRIQUE 146-054-18 HIBBS, KEITH A 146-054-25 FORRESTER, WILFREO J u- 04-007 16381 DEL MAR LH 04-007 16362 SANTA ANITA LN 04-007 16292 SANTA ANITA LN MUNTING70N BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 , . . 1 .,. w7C,�',•yy V •�i:).►:,i8�•:�yd4 -p+,<:.-.,.. i��'='�41 . t 146-054-12 WILLIAMS, WILLIAM 146-054-19 LANTERNIER, CRAIG 146-054-26 BURLESON, 'THERA MOZELLE; 04-007 16401 DEL MAR LN 04-007 16352 SANTA ANITA LN t{' 04-007 TR HUNTINGTON BEACH', CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 16282 SANTA ANITA LN �HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . 146-054=13 NGUYEN, TRUNG H 146-054-20. MARTIN, GRACE 146-055-01 SMITH, HAROLD J 04-007 16411 DEL MAR LN 04-007 116342 SANTA ANITA LN 04-007 5362 CALIENTE OR t HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 k HUNTINGTN ,BCH,. CAL 92649 146-054-14 TELLERS, MARK S 146-054-El; JENSEN, RAYMOND S. : 146-OSS-02 AUSTINi -JAMES' D 04-007 16312 'SANTA ANITA 04-007 16332 SANTA ANITA LN ! 04-007 53SZ CALIENTE ,DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 HUNTINGTH SCH, CAL 92649 :k HUNTINGTN BCH/ CAL 9264.9•;1;,�:� 146-CS4-15 SEMLER, JUDY L 146-054-22 BEER, ROGER ;146-055-03 BLACK, DAVID R 04-007 16402 SANTA ANITA LN 04-007 16322 SANTA ANITA LN ! 04-007 ';',5342 CALIENTE OR ) ! HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 'HUNTINGTN 8CH,. CAL 92649 146-054-26 DERAS, MARIA 146-054-23 RAWLINS, DANIEL L .JR .146-055-04 DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF 04-007 16382 SANTA ANITA 04-007 i 16312 SANTA ANITA LN 04-007 STATE OF CAL HUH71NGTOH BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 !!' , AGALSOFF, JAMES N (JT) 5332 CALIENTE OR k HUNTINGTN BCH,..CAL 92649 "R/r� — — -- r• - -- -- i�„t•� '� ..t�` r ' �'�'ti•''a=• •'`� '�,W,'S 1 ,J��r�`yt, ri�P��i � ° a.f,�....� �� N'r:j '�;'.►;A: j,�,� �,,��'�� ff•tkACAtJJ02/P I CTLI00; A;;A—pl 0it65 � Of-81-06 20+0 5-66 ' CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAO i '+'471 tj DISTRICT NUMBER= 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY " •�' •PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COO 146-04 146-051-02 JERMAIN BROTHERS INC 146-051-09 SHAFFER, KEN r'.• .. 04-007 0. � {.� q �YYF 04-007 ATTN ROBERT NEWTOLS O4-007 5251 MEADOWLARK OR �9, , %CARTIER REALTORS HUNTINGTON REACH, CA 9264 18153 BROOKHURST ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 246 146-051-03 WESTON, DONALO W 146-052-01 DOVERSPIKE, MARK DAVIO 04-0 ��++rr�•pe'le� 04-007 5311 MEADOWLARK OR 04-007 16282 ARLINGTON LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 !;•, 690'4f$ CIC�+ � �Rrlb�H° 246-051-04 SIEBER, BARNETT 146-052-Ot �d6 � W 04-00T%��1b1 C" '� r �.LrR�,...�.0 04-007 5301 MEADOWLARK DR 04-007 j� r�trlIl16TOH"LPN.' �� HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 H011YSNSrgK' 11046 r A h 6� '!!r4''HOUS�,_(¢'�'r.h AME�,�� 46-051-05 CAHEN, ALFRED G 146-052-CA'HOR Q 'r ultimo e 04-007d.'F','1 ,141:8E� ;oA1�EiL� • _. 04-007 5291 MEADOWLARK DR 04-007 P t;l►R4 ¢Tw fer ' UIJTINCa Ot}'`dE�ACH i CAI': �'9L�49"''V HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 h UTpN''811� 46 • y �! E�1. _ }46-051-06 CUNNINGHAM, MILDRED A 246-052-0 E,6zP`I�L,I, it 04-007x d 0, B -rf`1CTr ,... � 04-007 1053 BLOSSOM DR 04-007 9E8-.47 •... SANTA CLARA, CA 95050 Myt o 0„�! A �46-051-07 HOWES, WILLIAM G 146-052-0 �I4 04-007 5271 MEADOWLARK OR 04 007 ,t• : HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 '.,. 146-051-01 VAR6A3, MILLZAM J 146-051-08 LYONS, SCOTT PATRICK 146-052-0 • 04-007 5331 MEADOWLARK 04-007 5261 MEADOWLARK DR 04-007 ,, HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92649 0-4 IBM 6 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 669 DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS / CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE ,s.c,.,.•,., V , t' . 4t�'t , la- 146-043-06 ZOFF, H GRAHAM TR 146-043-13 LONERGAN, THOMAS '�' l 04-0074 191630EF"SARAjOdPaiLN�',,� 04-007 353 ANITA OR 04-007 16281 SARATOGA LN NdHTiNCTQ4 bE;4Cf4; ALA � 9t649,1 . PASADENA. CA 91305 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-042-25 BOOKE, JESSIE W 146-043-07 GOODING, GERALD R 146-043-14 DEL PINTO, PAUL J 04-007 16292 SARATOGA LN 04-007 5191 MEADOWLARK OR 04-007 16291 SARATOGA LN MUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-042-26 SWANDER, WILLIAM T 146-043-08 FUNKHOUSER, RONALD A 146-043-15 EICH, PETER C 04-007 16282 SARATOGA LN 04-007 5181 MEADOWLARK OR 04-007 16301 SARATOGA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-043-01 CARBONE, ANTHONY M 146-043-09 JORGENSEN, JAYEE D 146-043-16 MERG, HORST U 04-007 BADGER, THERESA M 04-007 5161 MEADOWLARK OR 04-007 16311 SARATOGA LN 5241 MEADOWLARK OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-043-02 COOK► GLENN D 146-043-10 HOLT, WILLIAM RSCN� fllEit,�eJAI}fiS A- - i 04-007 2821 TIGERTAIL OR 04-007 5151 MEADOWLARK DR :,'04-007'" P 0"OQX;,3koz il-.� LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 '`�i'""'Y" y' w1�bNr;�E1 ACna; CA '' 146-043-03 TUCKER, BARBARA A 146-043-11 BUTLER, VERA J r,.•74610�3�2a?!'ERI� � 04-007 20324 PERKINS AVE 04-007 %TOBIN REALTY aj,`:;041;0 74}i3�A'XrLR�.L�'iZ'AIA O , TORRANCE* CA 90503 5142 WARNER AVE $101 q;AiyMlllWlalH• ST HUNTIN6TON BEACH, CA 92649 '= t';41E3"iy C 146-043-05 KANE, JAMES A TR 146-043-12 BYARS, AGREE J lq?1146,-AO-Xf WNCdfST'ER• .� IA!K 04-007 5211 MEADOWLARK OR 04-007 16271 SARATOGA LN p,4-�'o ;f�1,,¢.X, ppA;•lN �+ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 M� �. i , i.• s01/rft CrL 0003272 05—tl-86 10801 PM 190S-86 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST 7��I VA4 h �_....,qY:''•r'T ulSi 4^'II '•• ._.t,r..�:11"',Ir��"—,r ��4N9SM�V.i� I�;��i�µ• � +1 DISTRICT HUMB�R? ,0"A-"y� !',l, HUNT.�IICTON,"OEACN 'CIRY'�yiti�� %v*J;y+i�'•h'�L''a' �PARCd4'lNO;f OW"IRS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP i- 'YRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 146-063-08 LEWIS, AMY 146-063-1S COVINA, CHARLEEN C V 146-063-22 MONDELLO, SALVATORE ET AL 04-007 . 16351 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 16402 BAYSHORE LN 04-007 16322 SAYSHORE LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL ✓ 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 i I I i J 146-063-09 CLARK, EDWARD DANIEL J 146-063-16 WESTEN, LAWRENCE V 32 146-063-t3 AMERICAN S A L ASSN 04-007 16361 HOLLYWOOD LN VV 04-007 ET AL 04-007 300 N HARRISON 2ND FL HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 16382 BAYSHORE LN STOCKTON, CA 95203 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i I � • 146-063-10 LATHAM, MARK S 146-063-17 NESTER, MICHAEL RAY ' 146-063-24 KIESWETTER, MARGERY A 04-007 16371 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 16172 BAYSHORE LH 04-007 16302 BAYSHORE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA `� 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-063-11 DAVIS, ROBERT E 146-063-18 ECKENBERG, ROBERT W ✓ 146-C6j-lfrN[ CH TOPN[R:'J,;' 04-007 11320 BIG DIPPER OR V 04-007 16362 BAYSHORE LN 11, 04-007' 16292 AY 0 E:.LN, MIRA LOMA, CAL 91752 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUN _ N N ACfHe ,, CA 92649 I 146-063-12 DOOD, DAVID J 146-063-19 STRAND, MARVIN P / 146-063-26' HARF . RONAL 04-007 16401 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 16352 BAYSHbRE LH 04-00T,' ?SEJUITo, JOSEP J IT AL i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 16282 BA SH E' �M HUNTINGTO BE A, CA 41649 �I 146-063-13 LEHTOLA, ARTHUR 146-063-20 FOAT, RICHARD D J 146-064-01 sHE ANri CH �LA 04-007 16411 HOLLYWOOD LN 04-007 16371 UNDERHILL LN .0 8617*.; 1618L--DAYS EY'°''.' E11li�9HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 ''':Y4,; HUNTINGTN r M l 146-063-14 FINNERTY, PETER ET AL 146-063-21 OLSEN, DOUGLAS R j 146-064-02 VAUGHN# CHRISTOPHER R li ti 04-007 16412 BAYSHORE IN + 04-007 16332 BAYSHORE LN 04-007 16291 BAYSHORE LN �j HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649' '1 Ipi`•.`"-�''i1A'�r��.T n��T•�•�'��TC'�d� .�'..ilif^,.. S _. •a'fl'd 'ir ','F:,�.�� ;�' .�I' .•IV•.'r "i,r tr.lit' •.�- :.apt__ .�...._ ,;T�"5'�^� ?�i 1, 'y7, �li,. . . r I' `�T',.`^ t,., ,r:' •��.�w;:'...1.4�••�.;�•d !;i il'1^;4•rIO+'�Jlyi'^T`..`.,.•1{'-1 tJn+. ..�h i �' '"' ^r•. ;..�... -' �: j' e .al i.is I. .•{�.,�-ii;�. �etJ!/i/PM.Qrl i/005)51; ' ' 05-11-86 10 t O1 PM 19Q5=86' 'C2TY/OISTRYC7 h PARCE L; LIST I t 'art, I+ ` til�, J' I r ' •!! ,pyx+��'At , i ri��l{;, •'r +7 J,15I IsrRlcr NumaiRt �` o54A RCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ 5 OWNERS " ZIP ;n PARCEL'`NO/, 'ti 'r OWNERS ''"? ' ,; r.' ; ZIP .TRA NAME AND .ADDRESS COOS TRA I NAME ANO,,AOORESS, CODE'.. TRA�?c';'! 'r•_NAME AND ADDRESS ' r COD �', � .I,I.i 1 it .,'' 1i• ,.i I ,. .. •M :146-351-04 D0E2IE r RODERT / 146-351-11 t " a !�i 146-35l-03 L[[rf IGEN!.I 1 r 04-007 ;:2416 UNIVERSITY DR, / 04-00��, "`/// r , . „ 04-007 ,,,'21842 OCEANBREEZE' L ,•y +y .I NEWPORT BEACH, CA �! 92660 '• 90740� I'; t ''I�I �,;.' HUNTINGTON BEACHr •CA ;r;l .9E6♦ ; 146-3S1-OS1BENDlR, MARJORIE HUCCIN� 146-351-13 CIT OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 146-352-04 BRETTr THOMAS J �• e •' 04-007,, ,16301 WOOOSTOCK LN V 04-00T P 0 B 190 04-007 . 3591 VENTURE OR 1`� I , HUNTINGTON BEACNr CA 92647 HUNTING BEACH, CA 92648' HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9264 146-351-06 BELL, ROBERT N 146-351,-14 PARISEAU, RICHARD J 146-352-05 GARDNER# JOHN L '' 04-007 9452 NANTUCKET 0R 04-007 26522 PRO CIR UNIT D ✓ 04-007 3008'HOLLY ST !I'•' NUNTINGTN BCHr CAL V 92646' HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 . . ALEXANORIAr VA 22305 146-351-07 KAOr LUKE S ' 146-351—IS GALANTIr LEON V 146-352-06 POWERS. RICHARD R ,.04-007 16946 CORAL CATLN 04-007 17238 SANDRA LEE 04-007 824 S BLUEBIRD CIR . HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 ANAHEIMr CAi 92607, 146-3.51-08 MEHLER, MERLE A TR j 146-351''-16' CASH. LILY S / 146-353-01 WINTERBURNr GERALD. t04-007 74 -870 REINS RD 04-007 3531 DAISY ST "`/// 04-007 4205 CHESHIRE OR THOUSAND PALMSr CA 92276 SEAL BEACH, CAL 90740 CYPRESS, CAL 90630 146-351-09 HASREr NAOILI 146-352-01 HOFFMEYERr DAVID C 146-353-02 SWANIGAN, HERBERT V T 04-007 29562 ORYBROOK LN ' 04-007 725 SERPENTINE ST 04-007 17132 —A HUNTINGTON BEACH, -CA 92646 REDLANOS, CA 92373 HARBOR BLUFFS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146.351-10 CHAP HAROLD S[UN6-KACK 246-352-02 KAPLAN, SAMUEL K 146-353-03 SHERMANr JOHN T 04-007 4216 MICHELLE OR 04-007 HEGINBOTHAM, BARRY ET AL 04-007 9149 S LINOANTE OR TORRANCEr CA 90503 %PACIFICA REALTY WHITTIER# CA 90603 " 18600 MAIN ST SUITE 140 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92648 t�tt��+ilG�i'�►4I '�'fi�l�'iC�.(d91�t3•; .;4'►>.:{^,;`f'�,,rn.1,i,^llrwwr'Ae+ll:",d:�^fi•�L%hA'f1;��1[f��I�iF•SI'+ At1�1!!Wf�i'iKTt' $��Yp •,rl. ..' '. '',1:.•',jYx� ?'';• '''�,r''ln�ar: 'O r.P', °',t kkgyMOT- �JSIJ fOTL. •0II�0 r0B-fl-O• lose&. /M 2905-66 CITY/OIfTAICT.:/ARC[L ',LIST ITRIC NUMBERS ' 054A -HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY I I s v`I,ms PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ I OWNERS , 1 ZIP ''�y`,�9. ''y'TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE • TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE ;.r! I i ' ,'146-344-06 CHAFFIN, MARCEL L 146-345-01 POND, HELEN L 146-345-08 BEVILLE, CARL M ' 04-007 16792 BUSBY LN 04-007 16742 ROBERT LN 1•: 04-007 16781 TRUDY LN ` HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 91647:.�� 146-344-07 BRANCATO, VICTOR A 246-345-01 OSAKO, TAKANOBU T 146-345-09 MC ATEER, J STANLEY, 04-007 9671 EAST RD 04-007 16752 ROBERT LN 04-007 16771 TRUDY LN REO, W000 VALLEY, CA 95470 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 "1 146-344-06 YATES► GEORGE F 146-345-03 CHASE, MARGARETHA .146-345-10. 50ITEUX, GEORGE F. 04-007 16781 ROBERT LN 04-007 16762 ROBERT LN 04-007 16761 TRUDY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL' 92647 i 146-344-09 MEUSCH, WILLIAM MICHAEL 146-345'-04 MURAKAMI, MOSES M 146-345-11 FAIRLESS& KENNETH 04-007 16771 ROBERT LN 04-007 16772 ROBERT LN "' 04-007, 16751 TRUDY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, .CAL 92647:-' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647' 1•; t ' :' I , I I. r. :r:f:�d� ' 1•' ••,1,'li 1 fl I.II„�;!(,�, 146-344-10 ROECK, ALAN L 146-345-05 KEIRLE, KENNETH 246-345-12 MITCHELL, 'ARZA L ''".i'. R';i .•,,, . 04-007 16761 ROBERT LN 04-007 16782 ROBERT LN 04-007.. 16741 TRUDY LN i.k,. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647• HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL ,9E647.;r� 146-344-11 HENNESSY, MICHAEL J' 146-345'—O6 BLANK, W B JR 146-351-0 , "' '_• f' 04r•007 .1621'7 CHELLA OR 1 04-007 A6792 ROBERT LN r 04-007 HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745 I HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 1f• ,A7� 146-351•-0 146-344-12. MILLIGAN, HORACE A 146-345-07 HANSON, JON C 3 04-007 16741 ROBERT LN 04-007 16791 TRUDY LN 04-007 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 91647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 ' . .. '� �. .,, 4y1HlR.�'.u' r ' s. ��•II ,I,' ,:','I 1 � !,� •�:�:'•, .,,. ��aY:?' cl ''w.. ..,. rv,�i+IW.la'w� k+aA,alfgr++�►' •i. •':p ++L.1' 1 "' ..i '1�J. , I'�. 7't r, .Irn F• �i � b ACIt.I701/rM'jCY1. 0101J11 so 1080,1 PM 19GS-66 ,CITY/Oi/TRICT, PARCIL LZOT �)`t; ;,�,•'' ¢'' 't`,j ', 't�'i' ,ri,'ASl',11'�.919• ' '' r p ', ,", 'o .� .. r 1. ,. 'I , •r ,r '1 r , .111.1 4, 1ris,r,DISTRICT NUMBER t 054A HUNTINCTON BEACH CITY. ll. A 11 1 I •f �I li!. `, N M; � A N AND ADDRESS '.CODt TRA: :,:'. NAME AND ADDRESS n, 146-233-60 NGUYEN# DAT MOANS 246-233-67 ELLI39 RICHARD D )�n' 146—l33-74 NERIO, ART. M 04-007 514t STALLION CIR 04-007 5172 GELDING CIR 04-007 9340 BOLSA AVE : HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA r� 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH,' CA 91641: i,•'; WE3TMI STI r CAL , 9268 t. i '+, w 146-t33-61'MC FARLAHO, WILLIAM L V r 146L233-68 MONETMAN, WILLIAM' J' 146—t33-75 NERIO,' ART M 04-007 ' Sl41 GELDING CIR 04-001 3162 GELDING CIR 'T'' :04-007 . 9340 BOLSA AVE '/ '' -1,NUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 r i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 C WESTMINSTER, CAL " 9168 -'146—i33-6t' MAC fARLANEa GARY W 146�233-69 ROYS, RONALD E i 146-233-76 LE DESMA, RAYMOND C 04-007 ,',5151 GELDING CIR 04-007 5152 GELDING CIR 04-007 5121 STALLION CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649' HUNTINGTN BCH,-CAL 9t6 '..146—t33-63 GRAHAM, RICHARD L 146-233-70 EDWARDS, JACQUELINE 146-233-77 TROTTER, JAMES H '.' - 04-007 5161 GELDING CIR 04-007 7041 STARLIGHT CIR 04-007 5141 STALLION CIR 1 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 146—t33-64 PERKINS, ROBERT- J 146-233-71 CLARK, DAVID C 146-233-79 GUEST, DANIEL J / 04-007 ' 5171 GELDING CIR 04-007 5141 PEARCE OR J 04-007 16621 PARLAY CIR J HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 i HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 '146-233-6S.PENNY, ROBERT A ' 146-233-79 YACONO, NATHAN N V 146-233-80 TREMAYNE► MARK D , . . .04-007 3181 GELDING CIR 04-007 9746 PRICHARD ST 04-007 26631 PARLAY CIR ..,HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 BELLFLOWER, CA 90706 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL ' 92649 • .)'146—t33-66 BOWERS, RALPH F J 146-233-73 GUSTAFSON, JOHN 146-233-81 BERCOVICI, ISAC '' .. 04-007 5182 GELDING CIR 04-007 P 0 BOX 111 04-007 16641 PARLAY CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 MUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 Flu. v 'r ►',Kul' ,� ,; i .. r ', ' .• r •�'y� '�' '' � �•��+►Lil'.w•�* t ♦ t..,'. ! : lA . , ' o. 'r ',�� . �d•r. :'t':�SN:S.L �..•6�•rt.•:ra.h•��'✓e.�..a(rw�iiMy� , •'w �1eetJ301/1Sn CTL 000571e 05-21-66 Io,ol PM. 1965784. CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL , LIST rAse' 7ia ' .'4 III MIS Simons= ri, OISTRtC1' F1�l�R 054A H TIN6T6N SE'ACH C T PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP { PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP :•TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 146-233-38 BENADOM. JOMN R ' 146-233-45 WALKER, WILLIAM 0 1 ` 146-233-53 GUEST, BETTY B 04-007 16671 ROOSEVELY LN 04-007 5071 PEARCE OR V " 04-007 21372 AUGUSTA AVE V MUNTINGTON .BEACH. C 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH• CA , 92646 ,1 146-233-39 POPE. DEREK L 146-233-46 SPRINGER► WAYNE K 146-233LS4 BRADY, JOHN E 04-007 16681 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 5061 PEARCE DR. .04-007 5171 STALLION CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-233-40 PICKETT, DAVIO L � 146-233-47 MARSHOTT, FRANK N / 146-233-55 MAC MILLAN, JAMES ' 04-007 16691 ROOSEVELT LN 04-007 8732 WESTMINSTER AVE �/ 04-007 5181 STALLION CIR HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 SUITE 4 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA, 92649 WESTMINSTER. CA /92683 J' 146-233-41 DRAHOS, CHESTER J 146 233 48 OBRAOOVICHr MICHAEL L 146-233-56 CRESPIN, N A 04-007 '16701 ROOSEVELT LN. 04-007 5031 PEARCE OR 04-007 5182 STALLION ,CIR ' HUNTINGTON BEACH. CAJ 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649.- I ' 146-233-42 IMAMURA. AKIRA 146-233-49 MCINTYRE, DAVID 246-233-57 BAUMANr ROBERT H ` - 0 16 1 ROOSEVELT LN' 04-007 5021 PEARCE OR 04 7 72 1 04-007 5172 STALLION CIR 'V 0 HUNTINGTON BEACH. C 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA.- 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 )1'46-433-43 CARROTHERS, EUGENE. A 246-233-50 LEr PAO PING I' 146-233-58 HAWKSFORDr CHAR 04-007 5091 PEARCE ST. 04-007 5011 PEARCH OR 04-007, 5162 STALLION CIR ��'° • . t• HUNTINGTNBCH, CAL' 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649I: HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL. 92649': •'146-233-44 PUTTNER, WERNER W 146-233-52 OYSKOW, PHILLIP J 146-233-59 MC KEATING,'ALAN '.04r007 5081'. PEARCE OR 04-007 5151 STALLION CIR 04-047 5152 STALLION CIR ' I '� 4 t HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL 92649 kUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649, MUNTINGTN.BCH* CAL 92649 ' ' f h "fyc7F'11t1IIJtS•V:.I� ICtVN+.•...1.,y t;- .: ,1 Z' ..A: .�'�:k'}Ii4 � n.p•tf. ••�gl.tltRr r f;. '' , �,t.f,!.y rL'I,• •t r I r r , � II i i '1 . ' �, ..I' I .. ,.I'6' r ilk�,�� NEW8i -86 CITY/DISTR=CT i DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ '�,f OWNERS ZIP PARCEL( NO/ OWNERS ZIP•1' PARCEL' NO/ OWNERS "Xv, TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA' NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA HAME'AND AODRESS CODE: 146-233-27 DE WENTER,'DAVIO J 146-23.3-24 CONNORS, 'CHARLES E. � 146—t33-31 JALALI, BIJAN •04-007 16692 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16641 GRAZ CIR ✓', ,�' �, 04-007 1162E GORHAM'AVE iL HUNTINGTH BCH► CAL 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA .92649 L03 ANGELESr CA. 90049 146-933-18 BAYARRESr WALTER M. 146-233—t5 ADAMS, EUGENE P fk' 146-233-32 SOUTHERN,CALIFORNIAA R 04-007 1666! PARLAY CIR 04-007 16661 GRAZ. CIR 1 04-007 TEAM INC ''' ' r '':' '� :;• HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL' 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 , . a" 5822 RESEARCH OR'.' ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-233-19 THOMASr MARGUERITE I 146-t3.3-26 FLANNIGAN,. WILLIAM .146-233-33 FLORAE OAVIO M .f1 �' 04-007 ' 16642 GRAZ CIR '04-007 LiJCILLE i 00-0'07 .16671 GRAZ CIR '� ''� ' ' 16672 PARLAY CIR ( ( HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL .92646. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ii HUNTINGTON BEACH, •CA 92649 . .;146-233-10 SHIDELER, ROGER W 146-233-27 DANNIS, WANDA IRENE ::' 146-233-34 HACKWORTH, ROBERT W .� 04-007 16662 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16681 GRAZ CIR 04-007' 16632 GRAZ CIR " HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, C •92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL' , 92646 r146-233-21 RAMIREZ* SALVADOR F j 146-233-28 TUCK, SAMUEL C 146-233-35 NERIOr DICK Y \,il 04-007 16642 PARLAY CIR 04-007; 16691 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16631 ROOSEVELT LN .f HUNTINGTON BEACHr' CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, A 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 .A46-233-22 LEMON, JAMES R SR 146-233-29 HALDENr JOHN F JR 146-233-36 HAUGLAND► WILLIAM H J/ r;.•.04-007 26632 PARLAY CIR 04-007 16692 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16641 ROOSEVELT LN HUHTINGTN BCH,. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 :146-233—t3 MEYERS, RONALD D 146-233-30 FLOYD, GERALD 0. 146-233-37 MULCAHY. NILLIA" F 04-007 16631 GRAZ CIR 04-007 16682 GRAZ CIR 04-007 ' 16661 ROOSEVELT LN HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 1 HUNTINGTH BCH► CAL 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 A� Z �c' r 04C6lJ301//M CTL 4005329 "05-81-06 10J01 PM 1985-66 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST �' �' r' i PAGE 716 StRICT.HUMBERt •, 054A, N?�N�1 I�L�E'I�' - - - ' PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP ,'; PARCEL NO/ I OWNERS ZIP r. . 'TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS GOOF 146-221-36 KWANi. CHEUK 3 I - / 146-L21-43 TRAN, DIEN VAN 146-233-07 CHILORESS, ROBERT L -. 04-007 16622 RECINA CIR vvv 04-007 24892 PASEO .VENDAVAL /� 04-007 P 0 BOX 409 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 EL TORO, CA. j1// 92630. STILLWATER► OK 74016 •146-LLI-37 VUKAS, PETER M I • 146-221-44 MONTEMER, CRESENCIA 5 146-233-06 DELLA PENHAv DOMENICO f 04-007 3262 LAMA AYE 04-007 18502 RECINA CIR •A 04-007 5031 STALLION tIR �/ "i LONG BEACH► CA 90808 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH► CAL 92649 ' ;146-221-38 WMETSELL► HARIL E 146-233-02 CARBONE, GERALD E 146-233-09 PETERSON► K RUSSELL +` . 04-007 7291 TOULOUSE DR $1 04-007 5111 STALLION CIR -� 04-007 5021 STALLION CIR V . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 , HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649. 146-221-39 7EE, 6ART W 146-233-03 7HOMPSON, OONALD B I. /, 146-L73-13 HEODONr MERRILL J 04-OQ7 9031 WENDY CIR 04-007 5091 STALLION CIR Ott/// 04-007 16661 PARLAY CIA FOUNTAIN VLYr CAL 92708 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92649 .3 146-222-40 PATELr ISHWAR THAKOR 146-233-04 CHIRCO, SAMUEL R V 146-233-14 ,KIMr TAE J 04-007 P 0 BOX 656 04-007 5081 STALLION CIR 04-007 16671 PARLAY CIR ,r WESTMINSTERr CA 92683 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 1146-L21-41 CHAN6, YU WEN 146-233-05 STEPHENS, MICHAEL 146-233-15 DUHCANr CARL L , 04-007 . . '30136 AVE DE CALMA 04-007 .5071 STALLION CIR 04-007 %LEE► TUSSIN6 RANCHO PALOS VEROES, CAL 90274 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 16104 TORTOLA DR ..HUNTINGTON BEACH, C 92649 146-221-42 LOUGHNANE, PATRICK V 146-233-06 BURN3P ROBERT C 146-233-16 DAVIS► WILLIAM L. 04-007 %POWERS COURT INV CO 04-007 5061 STALLION CIR 04-007 172 DEVON ;i; ' " 6071 SLATER AVE i200 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ' PLEASANT HILL, CA ' 94413 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 '::4. „ .. _ ;t , .. i r 1 i1�, ;1 1 , ' r1 , �af•a ,,I ` . .i '�tL.y��'' r, .� 1J;'•!'i^ It,. "' ti•; ",i .r_' I ,..� ,' ',�',' i� .; " ,r, .. ��M1.' 1, i,�i •'. '"`•`,h. y:':�Ir{�•� . tJl0tI�11 TL,.0001309,+, s00-i1-06 PARCt<�'''LIST; I,i* A ��'�'.', ,�. I..f^�,,�� j ,f L, �': ,.. 1 I:° 1 �ti , 9 i I•1�1 , . � ,.A'a1,��+4•�.i�;�� tp OISTRICT•NUMBER fOf4A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ' 'y. � }IA I�;P•ANO"�A�CR '!Q �' CODD RA H 0 d ! I MT IA NAM! ANO A !S ,,C 146-211J.'STELLRECHT, ROBERT L 146-2tl-20 SARKARIA, DALJIT 3 f , '• 146-121-29 LLANO, MARINO .q! 04-007 • '16521 GRAHAM ST ' 04-007 P 0 BOX 5986 04-007 • P 0 BOX S214 �►;a�; 1 ,'HUNTINBTN BCH, CAL 92649 ORANGE, CAL ' VZ667 ` GARDEH. GROVE, C� 9t645 I , c / ; 146—l11-Ia, SULLIVAN,'WILLIAM ET L 246-221-11 SARKARIA, DALJIT 3 146-121-30 MC EWEN, JAMES E �• 04- 0 G 04-007 P 0 BOX 5986 - . .,. 0 7 1 660 1 007 1702 3 FRIES AVE- GRAHAM ST 1 � 04 , i•L 9074 ',HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 � ORANGE, WI CAL � 926671 .. LMINGTON CAL 1 . 1 :�� ',r i, hen•; �', I T•�'l�lly.i 146—lL1-O8' JAY, MELVZN A 146=221-22 SARKARIA, DALJIT S I 146-121-31 LONGo,4ERALO W 04-007 , ' 3261 DRUID LN IE+ 04-007 P 0 BOX,5986 04-007 18151'LAKEPOINT'LN r• �'�. . : ,LOS ALAMITOS, CAL 90720 ORANGE, CAL 92667 HUNTINGTON BEACHV CA ('q' 9264 Y, f r i I A 1' 1 — 0— 1 A ' STRATT ' J• 146 !tl 3L MATIN S,r N •..y 146—tt1-09 DEAM,'RICHARD M 146-221 23 SARKARIA, DALJIT S �/ •K q; 04-007 .JAY, MELVIN A 04-007 P 0 BOX 5986 04-007 17081 CREENTREE LN f ,.., ;' r .••I• :8200 HEIL. I ORANGE, CAL 92667' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CAI ,.'9t64 UNTIN6TN dCH, CAL 92649 , . i.; 146-lt1-11,MAC CILLIVRAY, IALAN 146=221-26 DIVERSIFIED SHOPPING 146-221-33 MATINAS, STRATTON J �• `d .r 04-007 ' 5362 EL DORADO OR f • 04-007 ' CENTERS O4-007 17081 CREENTREE. LH HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 2910 RED HILL AVE ✓ i. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 SUITE 200 COSTA MESA, CA 9t626 n ' '•1146=221-17 GABRIEL, PHILIP L 146-221-27 LEONG, DOUGLAS H 146-221-34 BARRON# SOLOMON 04-007 P 0 BOX 718 04-007 8853 SANDPIPER CIR 04-007 1815 CALLE DE LOS ALA 03 I WHITTIER, CAL 90608 ' I FOUNTAIN VLY, CAL 92708 SAN CLEMENTE, CA ' 926721 'lar'I1 +1 1'rij Li � ,1 ;146-2t1-18 GABRIEL. PHILIP L 146-221—t8 LITRICH► ROBERT M .146-221-35 SAITTA, GEORGE N - . 04-007 P 0 BOX 718 04-007 16521 REGINA CIR APT 4 04-007 27911 DENVALE CIR �.,t.c. ' WHITTIER, CAL 90608 HUNTIN6TN BCMr CAL 92649 HUNTINCTN BCH, CAL 92649i Ijjijj In IMi .f' 'f i, '{I `.71 .i , K7:` L1!Ir.l•Y'd:w' ,..' ':.4r I:' � � i ,: ' / + .. .. 'u' ° ;-`rrl'l� AC6tJS91//M CTL 888156•! f 61-l1-BA 1•�•1 L.r . ... Ph 19AB+AA. ICiTt/rfRT11tCT ►AAt. 6L 'lt T�]; � Ij�•11�'{Fi��,,,s,'.,•';I.r t.,�,;y �:g�'i • 1� I.•r ,f!,l Ilt , r'•9'1'7,Sr•` ,,'4' +/ .��'la. �i"i�t t ��1' ■a �' IA A. {IMTIW@Tom;-s0' CHcC )f■!' PARC EL L NO/•' OWNERS ZIPPARCEL NO/ •0 NE S ZIP PARCEL AC[L NO/ 0MN ES .'ZI •0S TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS 'CODE T0.A NAM! AND AD0Alss •' O0 L i 146-t01-46 PATTERSON* RONALD R / 146-201-53 RHEE, CHOONG H ( 146-tll-06 'ICHINABA# DAVI0 .1, . 04-007 1680t STONEHAVEN CIR .V/ 04-007 16861 STONEHAVEN CIR 04-007 165S1 GRAHAM ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA '92649 MUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 �., 146-101-47 COFFMAN, ROBERT C TR 146-201-54 STEVENSON, DONALD C 146-121-07 MOON. DARREN ^, 04-007' 16801 STONEHAVEN CIR 04-007 16871 STONEHAVEN CIR 04-007 16561 GRAHAM ST 7 ;,HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 � HUNTINGTON BEACH#. CA 92649 HUNTINGTOH BEACH, CA 92649 ' , 1. I.. . ''I I !f 1 .r r. �'• •i�� 'fix!., '1146-201-48' GALIAHAIR WILLIAM M 146r201-5S JEFFERSON#'JAMES DONAL {L : 146-211-10',3ULLIVAN# WILLIAM J � •.�,- ;• 04-007 16811 ST04EHAVEH CIR 04-007, 16881 STONEHAVEN CIR 04-007 16601 GRAHAM ST ;NUNTINGTON BlACN# CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINCTON BEACH# CA � .9264 l+• , . I�: ,' , . I . I iI • I ri f � t1�1 ..� ( I �f+'!ti +'•146-201-49• BUTALA, MICHAEL A 146-211-01 HERIOr KOICHI j' I 114-111-11 BENT# JAMES ARBUTH 04-007 .+ 'l6821 STONEHAVEH CIR 04-007 9340 SOLSA AVE f I': IA-007 : 16SSt GRAHAM 'PL HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 I WESTMINSTER, CAL 92683 •'.I ' ' ;' , '.HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA '9264 II.146-t01-50 WEBB# ROBERT N JR 146-211-0t CORP OF THE PRESIOING `/ 146-211-12 1x[LTER# KEYIN C � I 04-007 16831 STONEHAVEN CIR 04-007 • BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF �I. 04-007 16562 GRAHAM PL , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 , TAX ADM 22NO FL 8500-5895 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 192649 l.' I 50 E NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY, UT 841SO "146-201-S1 SCHLUEHOER# WALTER 146'-211-03 URALMAN, ENGIN M 146-211-13 SCHEINSLUM, ROBERT PJ- ._ .:. _'.• _ 04.007 16841 STONEHAVEN CIR 04-007 S432 HEIL AVE / 04-047 P 0 BOX 680243 , , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA , 92649 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA . 92649 ' PARK CITY, UT 84068 :i il��' 146-t01-8t :OGAWA# PAUL 146-211-04 NAKASE, GARY S 146-tll-14 STELLRECHT# ROBERT L ;� i• 04-007 16561 STONEHAVEN CIR 04-007 16521 GRAHAM ST 04-007 16591 GRAHAM ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 . r WIN v� J r( I' 1, I. I NI, I `II + I y •y.• ., .t + `j.;• d. DISTRICT NUMB ER+ 054A I HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ' ��..... • 1 ..... y: ,•r.,• ..I o,,.-•'.r.r✓:,.. t.,t/''.t:"'9��" �:. tit'M"U•.,'h•'ill,trr ► i9' fJNf� a/ �P.ARC�t+"HOY° �1 �. OWNERS :.' IIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP h, PARCEL NO/ " ''ONNER r IIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE, .,. TRA' NAME AND ADDRESS CODE' I 939-330-86, CROW, ROBERT F 939-330-93 SIMPSON, JAMES M 939-331-00 BUHLER. KIRK ALYN 04.-007 4782 TIARA OR 9204 04400,7 • SIMPSON, JANE A 04-007 4822 TIARA DR 1202 HUNTINGTON BEACHi CA 92649 4792 TIARA DR 8203 HUNTINGTON BEACH.• CA, 92649 ? I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ; 939-330-87 �ESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-330-94 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-331-01 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO t i 04-007. %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 5 17802 SKY PARK CIR 9104 i 17802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104 IRVINE. CA. 92714 IRVINE, CA 92714 IRVINE, CA 92714 •939-330-88 HADLEY► JANE L 939-330-95 SPIRO, SCOTT A 939-331-02 BROMLEY. J ROBERT 04-007 ."4782 TIARA.DR %2.02 04-007 4802 TIARA OR 1201 04-007' . 41 BANK ST HUNTINGTON BEACM, ,CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA . 92649 STAMFORD, CT ' 06901 939-330-89 WALDER, EMILY J': 939-330-96 .FARO, GERALD JOSEPH 939-331-03 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO :04-007 4782 TIARA DR 4203 04T007 4802 TIARA DR 1202 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 17802 SKY PARK CIR 9104 IRVINE, CA 92714. 939-330-90 HAMPTON, GERALD C 939-330-97'CHRISTMAN, JOHN V 939-331-04 ARSENIAN, ALAN G 04-007 4792 TIARA DR 2204 04-007 4802 YIARA DR 1203 04-007 4832 TIARA OR 8202 . , 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA .t I 1 939-330-91 ESPINOSA, RUBEN O 939-330-98 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-331-05 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 04-007 `4792 TIARA DR 0201 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 %WESTFIELO DEV CORP " .HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 27802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 17802 SKY PARK CIR 1104 IRVINE, CA 92714' IRVINE, CA 92714' 939-330-92 WESTFIELD HUNTINGTON CO 939-330-99 TOWNSEND, JOHN D 939-331-06 SEABERRY, RICHARD A 04-007 %WESTFIELD DEV CORP 04-007 4822 TIARA DR 9201 04-007 4842 TIARA DR 1101 '17802 SKY PARK CIR 8104 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA, 92649 IRVINE, CA 92714 ; , . .��r .,�.,,•....I 1,4» L. ..I�,l.w'. .•u .Yn .'at'.1'.. 'htr'r�?:1J!V+!•,Yfio-�flon�r.�y.M•1�y71y,7,,.;stY.1Dti'iF�wniY1llM►711G�:�IIWi,•A !, �;"ti i ' �: F. f*# t•tQi L'•,••t'.fp' 'rr 7� •.�.�nntrfa t Q,I0iIUMBER: OSrA Hl/NTINGTON'BEACH CITT.• l t— p -4R[EL NO/ „ OWNERS- ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS zip Il TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE !, 163-292-36 VAN PATTEN. GUY E JR 163-292-43 PACIFICA PROPERTIES LTD 163-292-52 MARTINEAY. SARAH 0 04-007 4842 CURTIS CIR 04-007 27215 STUDEBAKER, RD 04-007 17222 LYNN ST ? HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 CERRITOS, CA 90701 . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926491 163-292-37 STEINER, RONALD N 263-292-44 PACIFICA PROPERTIES LTD 163-292-53 CALO, JOSEPH j i. 04-007 4852 CURTIS CIR 04-007 17215 STUDEBACKER RD 04-007 4035 COLORADO ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 CERRITOS, CA 90701 LONG BEACH, CA 90814 �' � ''„"'�R'�vPrqu•fs'1N't"T:"Y•ti�r;tr�•��W •'.+.j;F�t�et.qs,;,•a..P ..t r ••'l 163-292-38 RAMSAY, JOHN M 163-292-45 PACIFICA PROPERTIES LTD t' 163-301-01 DUNCAN, DOROTHY J 04-007 4862 CURTIS CIR 04-007 17215 STUDEBAKER RD 04-0071 12042 BAILEY ST APT 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 CERRITOS, CA 90701 r GARDEN GROVE► CA 92645 163-292-39 V00, DAVID C P 163-292-46 FLECKENSTEIN, JACK " 163-301-02 BRITISH HOME IN T^I 04-007 17231 GREEN ST 04-007 4811 LOS PATIOS OR !�� 04-007 CALIFORNIA LTD r HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 647 MANZANITA AVE S; SIERRA HADRE► CA 91024 } 163-292-40 SAGLIETTO, BART 163-292-47 COLLINS, PHILLIP M A 263-301-03 BROWNING, HETTIE A �i,�'t ' !� 04-007 ' 4861 LOS PATOS AVE 04-007 139 WEST YALE LOOP ;±: 04-007 %BROWNING, JOE C MRS', F ' �• HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 IRVINE, CA 92714� KENNETT► MO 63857 ,, . 163-292-41 DONAVEN, THOMAS W 163-292-48 WOOD, MARGUERITE L TR 163-301-04 DUNCAN, DOROTHY J 04-007 4831 LOS PATOS OR 04-007 126 MAIN ST 04-007' 12042 BAILEY ST APT l HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SEAL BEACH► CA 90740I GARDEN GROVE, CA 92645,,�1'• �l! 163-292-42 DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF 263-292-49 SWIFT, WALTER I 163-301-CS COLEt ORVILLE W 04-007 - STATE OF CAL 04-007 4771 LOS PATOS OR 04-007' 2572 ATLANTIC AVE ` 4821 LOS PATOS AVE , HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 LONG BEACH,.. CA '4 HUNTINGTON BEACH, to 92649 I• r r�•,.,�.q70 :rr�,,•aY.rN'.ti6tlrAr ,9+�1►ir I• 7 1 j i• ,�,�, '1'. llmA I' ,I .i ,' t1:1 I i 'llrl t ' I i I'. ! �� •a, 1ON f • "i I' ;,;,," I I..'� ,1, � , I' .... N •• � � 'A t I, I•�in*'.I'll`,,, ,h.I 'a /, (•.'.. � ' ^ ~:} ' i1 Irk , •� �' 4 .. i 1 ' 1 • ' ' ! , ' .I' ` . ' '"( 1 1 - ICT PARCEL LIST PAGE L.SOLMill 11 . ` ;i'DfSTRICT NUMBERS 054A I HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY , !".PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCE� NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE ' TRA NAME AND ADDRESS. CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE :'933-810-53 LITTLE, PATRICK J 933-820-60 MOLLET, ROY• L 933-810-67 ARMSTRONG, WILLIAM C 04-007 4972 BONITO OR 04-007 ', 203 ENO ST' 04-007 26827 BREAM LN . 'i HUNTINGTN BCH; CAL' 92649 SEAL BEACM'r CA -90740 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 933-810-54 LANG, ROBERT P „ 933-81.0-61 PHILLIPS, KEITH 0 933-810-68 STONE. KENNETH W u : ;.04-007. .'4976 BONITO DR 04-007 4967 SHARK OR 04-007 16831 BREAM LN �. HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL 92649 ' HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL 92649' _933-810-55; VENTLING, CYNTHIA 933-610-62 GIANCAMILLIr NICHOLAS C 933-810-69 RIPHAGEN; GARY ET AL 04-007 4978 BONITO OR 04-007 4961 SHARK DR 04-0'07 RIPHAGEN. MERLE 1' HUNTINGTON BEACHr'CA 92649 ' HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 11445 E 178TH ST ARTESIA# CA 90701 r. :933-810-56 HAMEL, RICHARD R 933-810-63 MOVSOVICHr .LIBBY-ANN ET 933-610-70 PERKINS, EVELYN J ,,04-007; 4982 BONITO DR 04-007 AL 00-007 16839 BREAM LN . HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 4957 SHARK OR HUNT7HGTON BEACH; CA 92649., HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 Y i ? 1933-810-57 FERRI39 KENNETH 933-810-64 BARRY# JOANNE M 933-810-71'KROP►LI; PETER K 04-007 4988 BONITA OR 04-007 495E SHARK OR 04-007 16841 BREAM LN HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 9L649�' 933-810-58 O'FARRELL, RUTH A 933-810-65 HESLOP, RAY'O 933-810-72 PAULr FRANK A 04-007 3647 OVERLAND AVE 04-007 200SI PORT GREENWICH LN � 04-007 -16843 BREAM LN LOS ANGELES; CA 90034 HUNTINGTON BEACH; CA 92646 1, HUNTINGTON BEACMr .CA 92649,E 933-810-59'HUSBARO, GEORGEVW',• 933-810-66 HARGI$t RICHARD N r; 933-810-73 COX', RANDALL I 04-007 9678 CHENILLE AVEI' 04-007• 4947 SHARK DR 04-007 16845 BREAM LN '+J" FOUNTAIN VLY, CAL 92708 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHr,yCA„',' 92649. + .71 1 '; ,,��. ;I ' °., ', . :. i •1, .+•, ; �'�� ,' , �, r� '�' it}�. ''✓+....:+ , . i.;�:: .. �' — 'Q�'rr• I ' •j'•�'�. �: ,�.,,.Vaarr�+..o�'—'` ,r•' ,ItA ANYI�., �f4 1`AC6E5301/FM CTL 0006895 '05-11-86 16:01• PM 1.985-66 CITY/DISTRICT, PARCEL LIST , PAGE E11301•.f, � •I PARCEL NO/,l�',' OWNERS I ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP'• PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP 1 ;' ,'. TRA' '.• NAME ANO ,ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA :I NAME AND ADDRESS COD 933-810-32 NORTON# JUDY E .933-810-39 JAFFEr ANDRIENNE 933-810-46 INGRAM, JOAN M 04-007 4982 MARLIN DR 04-007. 4971 BONITO DR 04-007 16815 SNAPPER LH �u HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA .92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 J933-810-33 TULLIOr JAMES A' 933-810-40, HAMUr KAINO J 933-810-47 WILLIAMS, WILLIAM E 04-007 5331 GLENSTONE OR 04-007 25142 WANDERING LN 04-007 16821 SNAPPER LH HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 pEL TORO, CA 92630 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 933-810-34 WILLIAMS# HENRY L 933-810-41 ERIKSSONr LARS 933-810-48 SHEOLOCK, ROBERT t; 04-007 ,4988 MARLIN OR 934 04-007 3521 HEATHER CIR 04-007 P 0 BOX 685 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SEAL BEACH CA 90740 SUNSET BEACH, CA 90742 933-810-35 HERSH# DALE R 933-810-42 SHAVER, PAMELA 933-610-49 FURNISS, STEPHEN GRAHAM 04-007' 4987 BONITA OR 04-007 4961 BONITA OR 04-007 PARKER#' ANTHONY C HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 LA 57�2 SILVA 9T 11' EWOODr CA 9071 1 I I •;;r'; 933-810-36 TOWNSENDr ROBERT f 933-810-43 CARLEY, MARIE A TR 933-810-50 HISSENr MAUREEN H 04-007 4981 BONITO OR 04-007 16801 SNAPPER LN 04-007 4964 BONITA OR 1 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA, 92649 933-810-37 'SELSTADr KATHY S 933-820-44 CESSOP, CHARLES T 933-810-SI GUERIN, PATRICIA C 04-007 -4977 BONITA OR 04-007 2660 WALNUT AVE SUITE B 04-007 4966 BONITO OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 TUSTIN, CA 92680 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 ;:933-810-38 HAMM, RICHARD A., 933-810-45 LOPEZ, ADOLFO •933-810-S2 SCHREIBER, MAX A.'TR 04-007 11032 CORONEL -RD 04-007 16811 SNAPPER LN 04-007 4949 WARNER AVE SANTA ANAr CA 92705 f HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 I. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA.. •!r•�'I '•1 I '+ ' .. ,1 r1 'C, ,r �•'• • o' �^ 1'+J_•'� .+, .. 1 ` .. 11`}�.rW;� .d` ' r' •++rlMl '`111� •AC62J301/FM CTL 0006894 05-21-86 10:01 PM 1985-86 `CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST ' PAGE 1.300 TRICT N millt '• ' I•'! 1, I •'1 �'• ' . , + III 1 ,PARCEL NO/ " OWNERS' ZIP :,PARCEL NO/ OWNERS -ZIP PARCEL' NO/ OWNERS P TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND.ADDRESS CODE, I .TRA.' '' !,NAME AND ADDRESS DE tl", 933-830-11 GARCIAr EDUARDO Y 933-810-18 ELLIS► KATHLEEN 0 933-810-15 DALSIMERr CHRISTOPHER T I��•d� 04-007 5462 BANKTON DR 04-007 P 0 BOX 102 04-007 499L PEARCE ST , ►�'1 ;; ! HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ! 'SUNSET BEACH, CA• 90742 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9 49 T I , r , ,933-810-12 PLECHNER# CAROL A 933-810-19 CUMMINGS, MARIE PATRICE 933-810-26 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE i:;`'. 04-007 4942 PEARCE ST 04-007 +' 4972 PEARCE ST 04-007 ASSN NUNTINGTN SCHr, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 %ARCS MORTGAGE INC • P 0 BOX 1600 CANOGA PARK, CA 913 933-610-13 VALOVI KATE H 933-810-20 VISCETTO, EMILIE 933-810-27 LANDER, KATIE ANDERS 04-007 KALPAKOFF, KAREN E 04-007 4976 PEARCE ST 04-007 %TAPLIN, IRENE 4946 PEARCE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649. • WESTBERG INVESTMENT NUNTINGTN BCH, 'CAL 92649 8071 SLATER AVE 8160 " HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926 933-610-14 SAT, MARGARET J 933-810-21 MILLER, HOWARD H 933-810-28 CANNON# ELANE K 04-007 18542 PUEBLO CIR 04-007 . 4978 PEARCE AVE 047007 4968 MARLIN OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,' CA 926 ,;.•933-820-15 ASHBYr TOM 933-810-22 STANTONr RICHARD E . 933-610-29 RIVIERA HUNTINGTON 04-007 4952 PEARCE ST 04-007 4982 PEARCE ST 04-007 CONDOMINIUMS INC HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 %ARMSTRONG# W C ' 16827 BREAM LN HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA .,92 9 933-810-16 HUANGr 6LORIA W 933-810-23 WARREN, GEORGE L 933-810-30 TONGBAI, PAISUL 04-007 4440 IRONWOOD AVE 04-007 2604 S BORDER 04-007 APT iW119 1/2 c7 t SEAL BEACH# CA 90740 CORONA, CA 91720 1125 E 17TH ST SANTA ANA, CA 92 1 '933-810-17, GOEKEr ROBERT FRANCES 933-810-24 THURMANr DEBRA K 933-810-31 PHILtIP3. KATHLEEN E 04-007 ' 88 SETON RO 04-007 THURMAN, RALPH S O4-007 4978 MARLIN DR IRVINEr CA 92715 ! 361 CANADA SOMBRE I NUNTINGTN BCHr CAL 926 ! j LA HABRA# CA 90631 1In }d41, ' ,ti arm _r<.. ' '... .aka'' �`•- - — -- ' '�;R 1'{'`"•',, ��i(,[� lit,,. •'�-�,'�'�:��!' � ,f� .r, '�'', II' r r.,�' 1 ;.e •I,t'i•`�rt' iVi�',�i' ` r. , :�, i. � :;"f�hl��+� i .+ ,t , `� f, � t 1 ','r1,r'. I , h.,f^ry.1,•• j�; ''�� f AGtJJ01/,'M�CTL 0006893 05-t1-86 10101 PM 1985-86 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST V. ,DI3TRICT- NUMBER= 054A -.HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY i f• y PARCEL NO/'' •',;: OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP : PARCEL NO/' 'I ' ....OWNERS ::,.ZIP . �..TRA 'r' NAME ANO ADDRESS CODE TRAr NAME, AND ADDRESS COD! .TRA",i t'''NAM[:AND ADDRESS CODE' �I 933-513-77 MOLA 'DEVELOPMENT CORP 933-5t3-84 MOLA, FRANK J i' 933-810-04 NEED, 01ANl .M 04-001, „ 8072 ADAMS AVE 04-001 8072 ADAMS AVE 04-007 ,tr 4902, PEARCE' ST:: ••+''� •`��, "�::� ,n, HUNTINGTON BEACH.' CA .9t646. I HUNTINGTON REACH r:CA 91646 " ' ,i. • HUHTINGT" BCM,.CAL�Ja°•Ij'•'''f�r9264,1 933 S,23 78 M0LA DEVELOPMENT CORP 933 523 8S MOLA' DEVELOPMENT CORP 93318I0—OS' MANNA, ALLEN• ,04-002 807 ADAMS AVE 0 ADAMS AVE 0 — 0 4906 PEARCE AVE �'' ' r 2 04-001 8 72 D •: 4 0 7 f HUNTINGTON BEACH, ,CA 92646 I HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA ' ; '92646 1 HUNTINGTti BCH, CAL 92649 ,,_ + 33-523-7 0 FRANK , I M LA A K J FRANK J •9 •3 8 0'06 P T N LEST ER A 'N 9 9 , 933 523 B6 MOLA FRA 3 1 E S EI . LE ER LA 04-001• 8072 ADAMS AVE 04-001 8072 ADAMS AVE 04-007 4908 PEARCE ST II 'HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 , ' HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA.., 92649 ' 933—S23-80 HANLON, MART ANN 933-523-87 PEEBLES, DESMOND E 933-810-07 CURLEY, ROBERT FI ,'�' r'' ,04-001 8131 RACEPOINT OR• fI01 00-001 8131 RACEPOINT DR 1204 04-007 4912 PEARCE ST - HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649;. 933-523-81 NTLIE, MEL J 933-810-01 ERICKSON, ROBERT F 933-810-08 FRANTZ, MICHAEL J . • } '04-001„ ' '8131 RACEPOINT OR 8102 04-007 4892 PEARCE AVE 04-007. 4916 PEARCE ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,.CA 92649 ' �„ a r' '. .�' '�,•� 933-523-8t PLUNKETT, RONALD R 933-810-02 HERSOLD, ALBERT B TR 933-810-09 FILTY, GRACE t '� 04-001 8131 RACEPOINT DR 0103 04-0;07'" 16128 TORTOLA CIR 04-007 4918 PEARCE AVE �r HUNTIN6TON BEACH,' CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 NUNTINGTH BCH,'' CAL 9t6g9;.1 +'',f . ,.� 933=523-83 KRAMER# SUSAN P 933-810-03 NIELSEN, TERRY 933-610-10 PRUDEN► CLARENCE A JR 04-001 , 8131 RACEPOINT OR 1104 04-007 4898 PEARCE ST 04-007 4936 PEARCE ST t, " HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 NUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9t649 . f S 4 1, hJ^', a...tN.: Nii •.tr�,r p '' ' ,',.'..,,d:anAru!� ,r,/�YJ• Y.n.r .y+. .,,'In r .. � :� � •t:'air.1•! no- D2fTR2CT ►ARCEL LIST f1't�8� DISTRICT NUM85R 054A, HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY ` ;'' i,. '." ,• " No/ ..,.,.'!'' OWNERS AML AND ADDRESS CODE TRA I NAME .AND'ADDRESS CODE TRA, ' NAME ANO. AOORESS CODE 146-493-21 HORDTKE# DORIS C 146-493=28 TRITZ, •LAWRENCE'.J �• 146-493-35 SMERWOODr MARJORIL TR Og-007 5361 OVERLAND OR 04-00 16952 CANYON LN V 04-007 t S465 OVERLAND DRr!" *4' HUNTINCTON BEACH CAv 92649 HUNTINGTON DFACN CA 92649 r HUHTINCTOH'BEACH& CA ;a' +� 9L649 146-493-22 GRAY; LYNN 146-493-'29 HAYES, GAYLE KOVALY f/ 146-4934.36 MOSS. RO JEAN K V 04-007 S371 ,OVERLAND DR 04-007 5435 OVERLAND OR " .• 04-007.- , 5471 OVERLAND OR NUNTINGTN BCH# 'CAL 92649 " HUNTINGTON•BEACH#. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649.; !. I ' �I. —!. ''' It •�',.�, '� ' 1 + Yid s - f ' 1 .. I' i+i" .r i I ''tL .. •:!r� r 146-493 23 NELSON* CARLYLE H 146-493t3C MIODOUGH, RENA J '146 493-37 RANSOM. LEOTA M 04-007' 3381 OVERLAND OR ;04-007 5441 OVERLAND OR 04-007" MANAUGH# LEOTA M NUNTINGTN bCM# CAL 92649 NUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 , , 1685L COACH LN 'HUNTINGTH BCH# CAL . 92640 J46-493-24 GREENHALGH#' MARTIN 146-493-31 NORTON* SAUNDRA LYNNE � 146-493-38 CLINE# A STEVE 404-007 16962 CANYON LN 04-007 5445 OVERLAND OR 04-007 16862 COACH LN �•�,;� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH# C 92649 146- 493-25 ALBIN, DAVID E 146-493-32 MYERS# STEVEN S 146-493-39 WOOD# DAVID R t/ ;04-007. 5401 OVERLAND OR 04-007 54S1 OVERLAND OR 04-007 . ' 16872 COACH LN {/ • NUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 'f NUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-493-26 GREENHALGH, MARTIN 146-493-33 WEBB# MYRNA R 146-493-40 MORAN# WILLIAM J 04-007 • 26962•CANTON LN 04-007 545S OVERLAND OR 1 04-007 16882 COACH LN r �..� HUNTINGTON BEACH, A 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH#• CAL 92649' 146-493-27•,ALONZO, GLORIA L 146-493-34 NAEVEr MARJORIE V 146-493-41 000Or JAMES I -404-007 GREENHOLGH# MARTIN R 04-007 5461 OVERLAND DR 04-007 16892 COACH LN 16962 CANYON LN HUHTINGTN BCH* CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 .. , `« .. .e,,,p,�i•- -•-yc• Jdttv.'.-./V�y4+ti�Idl••• r�W:.�a•r,j,•.W �,,.n. ,'uY�i,jF,lA .(1,. •^"'_'. CIL LIST ; ,P1►BS t.,�B*. ';�O,ZSTRICT NUMBERI 054A ' HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY r aAi1"tits:'.�lgr,"?,.F . 1TP'i, pAR EL H�/ OWNERS ZIP PARClI NO/ OWNERS ZI " �� MEEiiUUNNd++'AODREIst' >' �00� TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA ' NAME AND ADDRESS COOL ; 146-493-42 INGRAHAM, GEORGE H 146-494-07 COOK, 'AYQTRELLE H / 146-494-14 STESEMANN, WILLIAM 9 . 1 r '•• 04-007 26902 COACH LN '/ 04-007 16922 RED ROCK CIR V 04-007 169SI AGATE CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL iV 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 t 'HUNTINGTN SCH. CAL // 91649 146-494-01 MAYSWINKLE, GALE C TR 146-494-08 BRIMLET, WINIFRED :A/ L 146-494-1S LOWE, LOIS N •04-007 26971 REDROCK CIR / 04-007 16932 REDROCK CIR 04-007 16961 AGATE CIRHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL' , 9:649 146-494-01 DRAPER, HARRIET ANNE TR 146-494-09 BANK* CALIFORNIA 146-494-26 ROSSMAH, LAWRENCE L 04-007 26961 REDROCK CIR 04-007 CANAOIAN TR 04-007 13897 AMBER SKY LN , HUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 700 S FLOWER ST SAN DIEGO,` CA 92119 I LOS ANGELES, CA 90017', 146-494-03 MAHONY, ROBERT W 146-494-10 STONE► ELIZABETM A 246-494-17 SERRANTINO, SALVATORE✓ 04-007 16951 RED ROCK CIR 04-00.7 16952 RED ROCK CIR 04-007 1134 COLDWATER CYN OR ? ' HUNTINGTN ,BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH,. CAL 92649 BEVERLY HILLS, CAL ,,. :90L10. 144-494-04 WINTERS, BARBARA M. 146-494-11 RICE, GEORGE M 146-494-18; JONES, 'JOHH H'" i •' ;�` 104-007 • 26941 RED. ROCK CIR 04-007 16962 RED ROCK CIR " 04-001 169SZ AGATE CIR 'HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 ! HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 ' HUHTINGTH`SCH, CAL`I 92649. 146-494-05 LONG, TINA T 146-494-12 MC KEE, JOSEPH T TR 146-494-19 RICHMONO,' FRANK J 04-007. 26931 RED ROCK CIR 04-007 26972 RED ROCK CIR 04-007 26942 AGATE CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL I 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, C .92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 146-494-06 LA (EVER, NEWTON C 146-494-13 SUMMERFIELD, WILLIAM F 146-494-20 SHARRARr HARVEY. W � .k.04-007'' 16932 RUBY CIR i 04-007 '•16931 AGATE CIR 04-007 16932 AGATE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 •, *-�r �� ,�tsrtf5� t'JE�S w9tt�'d�od�=��/ ► ., ; lQ�tKt I •.'r LAI a N •tl•�s Bo011/N �' 2 •MN yi'alr�fB7wse >< ,�AACtIa� , •*• i:>t f IS } N NTZ N , NOW , 1 %ARCEL, NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ) ZIP ` TRA ii NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE '146-492-31 CORDON. RUTH M 146-493-07'PLEWEr WALTER A 146-493-14 DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS �''• 04-007 16921 RUBY CIR 04-007 '•5432 BONANZA DR 04-007 STATE OF CAL ' HUNTIN6TH BCHr CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCNr CAL 92649 f BARKER# JAMES E 5431 BONANZA OR HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL, 92649 46-493-01 BECKSTROM# ROBERT L 146-493-08 CART. CHARLES E 146-493-15 LE1'HE, GWEN W )-j+.04-007 26841 HARKNESS CIR 04-007 5442 BONANZA OR 04-007 5421 BONANZA OR li'):.• HUNTINGTON BEACH#'CA, 92649 I HUNTINGTN BCH# ,CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH► A 92649 146-493-02 CRAT, LLOYD F 146-493-09 WINSLOW, BARBARA J" , 146-493-16 CARET. PHILIP A 04-007 5362 BONANZA DR 04-007 4236 CHATWIN AVE 04-007 5411 BONANZA OR ' HUNTINGTON BEACH'r' C 92649 LAKEW000# CA 90713 HUNTIN6TH BCH# CAL 92649 .'• 146-493-03 'JONES, EARL 0 146-493-10 BIERLEIN# LUCILLE M J 146-493-17 OUNN# HELEN D V f 04-007 .5372 BONANZA OR 04-007 5462 BONANZA OR' 04-007 5391 BONANZA OR I' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL ,. 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL 9264 rr146-493-04 SPORLEOER# JUNE - 146-493-11 VANDEN BOS# RICHARD 246-493-18 COWENr LOIS F ) ., 04-007 9392 BONANZA OR 04-007 5461 BONANZA OR ' 04-007 $381 BONANZA OR HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. A 92649 �146-493-05 CHASE. FRANCES L 146-493-12 FELOSTEIN# KATHLEEN E 146-493-19 HUTCHISON, CLINTON R 04-007 %VILLAGE INVESTMENT CO 04-007 5451 BONANZA OR 04-007 5361 BONANZA OR { P 0 BOX C-19611 HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL 92649 IRVINE* CA 92713 146-493-06 -DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS F 246-493-13 PELLr JACK E 146-493-20 DAUM* GEORGE E -007 STATE OF CAL 04-007 5441 BONANZA - a'04 Z DR 04 007 5351 BONANZA OR ,F• 5422 BONANZA OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL' . '92649, HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92647 +)r� ' .nwsaca��rr'r.r �,,•r- ,PYD�Ni�M�r��#� '. . I ' .. ' l r'��.f'+ r PARCEL NO/ OWNERS , ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO1, OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA i NAME AND .ADDRESS CODE I TRA NAME:AND ADDRESS 000E ��el 146-49E-30 ARNOLD, PETRONELLA F 146-492-37 KUSSMAH, BERNADINE J 146-492-44,MILLER, MATTHEW TR , 4 04-007 3E0' H FAIRVIEW AVE 84 / 04-0071 CLANCY, BERNADINE �•:, 04-007 I, 16962 RUBY CIR „ GOLE.TA# CA 1 f 93117 I 5331 BONANZA DR V. HUNTINCTON BEACH, CA 9E649 .HUNTIN6TN BCH• .CA 92649 ; 146-492-31; FI[L03r STANL[Y D TR 146-492-38 SMITH, MAX, "• ''I ; 146-492-45 FROLEY`, NEIEN J ''10�-007 16902 CANYON LN 04-0071 5332' BONANZA DR 04-007 •" 16972 RUBY ,— r' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i HUNTIN6TN BCH, •C 92649 ' 'I ;' HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA:, 92647 '1 :C' ,,• ��I l • . ' � •" ': ;.l i� ��. � ,�, I Ir �4 ', �tFr I,� , y'`t •f,;..�4 11 J,�c ,i . -32 HOUCK, GEORGE B 246 —499-39 OVERHOLTZ, FRANCI3. R �. 146-492-46' MICHKY, GEORGE L46-492 04-007 16892 CANTON LN 04-007 5342 BONANZA O 04-007 16971 RUBY CIR• i HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL i. 92649 i HUNTI14GTH BCH, CAL 92649 ��'i. ,, HUNTINCTN BCHr: CAL ':;;j' 9264• 146-492-33 BURKEr DORRIS M 146-492-40 MATTHIESEN, CEORGE L 146-492-47 RHOADS, 'JOHN R 4. ,,.04-007 .16882 CANTON LN 04-007 16922. RUBY CIR ' ' :. 04-007.'• 16961 RUBY CIR ; HUNTIN6TN BCH,' CAL 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACHr, CA 92649 : HUNTINCTN BCH, L 926'49', 1146-492-34 OUHKIN, A 0 • J •146-492-41 BECKSTROM, GLORIA STON 146-492-48 WARNER, WINTON T ; 04o007 '9601 E OCEAN BLVD 9405 04-007: 16841 HARKNESS CIR 04-007 16951 RUBY CIR LONO.B[ACH#, CA 90803 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINCTN BCH# CA 92649 146-492-35 HART# ESTHER 'D 146-492-42 DORRANCE, LOIS J 146-492-49 WICKS, WILLIAM D 04-007 . 53tt OVERLAND OR 04-007; 16942 RUBY CIR , IC 92649 04-007 16941 RUST CIR ?' HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92649HUNTINGTON BEACH :HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 146-492-36 NACLE, MICHAEL J 146-492-43 LA FEVER, NEWTON C 146-492-50 SHOMAKER, MARION L 04r.007 3341 BONANZA OR 04-007: 16952 RUBY CIR 04-007 16931 RUBY CIR 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ' . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL . I r .. + �.,5 ili ' „t r •, o I I'.. ^i'. --- i`, 1~'i 1 ,Q IJI 71' .. , r.t ,� r6•i, ,� Lab 6 Is�so= rn. CrL.'oeomais oo=ti-06 less lip I PARCEL NOl OWNERS 22P PARCEL NO/,. ' OWNERS ZIP „' PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP a�•;TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA ! NAME AND. ADDRESS CODE'• . TRA r ,:NAME AND ADDRESS COOL 1464492-09 99LLY* FRANK H ;;' 146-492-16 CAREY* MICHELE .146-492-13 DAVIS*'ELLEN P `.• 04-007 NCR LO BOX 2400 04-007 16901 CANTON LN / 04-007' 1175 E AMA00 RO r/ I ' BLTTHlo CA . / 92225 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA V 92649 PALM SPRINGS* CA `� 92262 r1,tr V . �146-49L-10 WILSON, LLOYD E / 146-492-17 PRICED J BARRY j 146-49E-24 SMITHD CORDON G JR rl' 04-007• 16861 CANTON LH J 04-007 16911 CANTON LN 04-007 16981 CANTON IN MUNTINGTN BCH* CAL 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH* CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHo CA 92649 146-492-11. LAIN, H MORRIS ` r 146-492-18 OU CUENNOIS, FRANCIS R`9rR 146-492-25 TEETER* RUTHE E V _ 697 CANYON LN 8 C 0 7 69 1 CANTON LN 04-007 16972 Y 16 S CANYON LN 04 0 1 2•'04 007 6 N MUNTINGTN BCH* CAL ' 92649 . HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH* CAL , .92649 ' 146-492-12 KANOFf, NORMAN HATHANIAL ,/ 146-492-19 CHORMICLE* RANDALL F•' 146-492-26 GREENHALGH, MARTIN Rj ;••',04-007 P 0 BOX 836 V 04-007 16931 CANTON LN 04-007 16962 CANYON LN ;`•i ' GLENDORA*' CA 91740 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 146-492-13 LEO, NICK C 146-492-20 DAVIS, ELLEN P 146-492-27 DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF / i 04-007 1687S CANYON LN 04-007 1275 AMADO RD 04-007 STATE OF CAL v 'HUNTINGTN BCHs CAL 92649 PALM SPRINGS, CA 9E262. 16952 CANTON LH HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 9t649 46-492-14 PAYNE* RICHARD M 146-492-21 HENDERSON, MARGARET 146-492-28 JORDAN, JOSEPH J " ". 04-007.' 16881 CANTON LH 04-007 • 16951 CANYON LN 04-007 16942 CANTON LN MUNTINGTN BCHo CAL 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL . 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHs CA '92649 46-492-13 HOBBS* R MICHAEL 146-492-22 SPENCEo JOHN TERRY 146-492-29 FIERCE, VELNA . 04-007 '26891 CANTON LN 04-007 16961 CANTON LN 04-007 16932 CANTON DR HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 CBrJ�S -77 1/Pff,0n' ••Soso•' '••=u-•• 1•.• , ...._ �t „•,. �` +'�;�; ;�� ''� ;:lABt, ,hrullijr. r,w ! 1 M 10••-•• C111"ISTRICT ,PARCEL 1161 NI OISTRICT, NUMBER 054A� i HUNTINCTON BEACH CITY ,. • , :; '. ,, t , , PARCEL NO/ -OWNER ZIP PARCEL! NO/ OWNERS ZIP ARCEL NO/ ,OWNERS ZIP . i: . • TRA NAME AND A ESS CODE TRA NAME AND.ADDRESS : , CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COOS �' 146-483-16 MC' PARLAND. J DONALD 146-483-23 IWASAKI GREGORY 3 146-492-02 CORDON, CHARLES J '" 04-007 6631 MASON 'DR 04-007 16541 F UNTAI4 LN 04-007 14911 RUBY CIR HUNTINCTN BCNr CAL 92647 MUNTIN ON BEACHr CA 92647 HUHTINCTH BCHr CAL 1/ 92649 144-483-17 ,EVANS# R CHARD S 146-463-24 SECOND WE TERN OME 46-492-03 OAVIS, LARRY J ,04-007 '664V-MASOH OR 04-007 FINANCING ASSOC TES, 04-007 P 0 BOX 3532 T I ;HUNtIN6TON BEACH, CA 92647 j . LEWIS, CM LE F SAN PEOROr CA 90731 I f 1653� FOUN AIN• L „ HU dNGTOH BEACH, CA' 92647 246-483.101ANOERSON, JOHN C 146-483-25 9 ETA Ar CA L t` 46-492-04' JEHKES, VAUGHH ALAN 04-007 6651 MASON OR 04-007 6521 DUN I. LN 04-007. ', XBAD KREUZNACH ELEMENTARY " r' •,' MU TINS ON BEACH, ,CA .92647 IIUNTINB ar,• CAL 92647 SCHOOL 1 i 14 APO' NEN YORK " ' 0925E l i, 1' i .� 4(( I ri ��,•,ff:. ✓I{iry,l'1 1'� .t Y ;.y.146-483-19' ECOND WESTERN HOME 146-483-26 M CUTCH ON. PRYLLIS D ;� 6-492-OS YOUNG, ANHA T j'• 04-007 ,F�INANCINC ASS SATES 00-007 1 '5�01' FO NTAIN Lk 04-007 16931 RUBY,CIR 3050 WILSHIRE BLVD i H NXINCTN BCH, CA� 92647 "' HUNTINGTON.BEACH, CA 9264 SUITE .210 j LO AN6ELES, CAL 90005 ,:`146-483-LOr NEWBERR r ROBF�'RT 0 146 483-29 HURCH'►, OMMU}l�T UNIT 6-492-06 ALLEN, MAR6ARET U „ •"�' '•�,,'� 04-007 16681 MASON OR: �' 04-007 . METHODIS OF TIN6T0 04-007 5311 OVERLAND OR HUNTINGTON BEtCH,; CA 92647 + 66d2. HEIL HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9E649 ' HUNTIN Hr CAL 92647 , -1' °•�'1146-483-21 IX, KENNET R 46-491-01 -492-07 KRATZER, WAYNE A , '04-007 , /4691-IIASOW� R � 04-007. 04-007 5305 OVERLAND OR TNTINGTON ,BEACH,' CA 92647 i 1 IN_T HUNTINCTON.BEACH. CA 9264 11, 146-483-22 WACOftER, HAROLD M' t 46-492-01 KIRKLENr CHARLES A JR • 146-492-08 LANGE, CAECILIA C 0 All-007 ' 670ZIMASON DR 04-007 5351 OVERLAND DR �= 04-007 5301 OVERLAND OR ` HUNTINSTN.BCHr CAL' 92647 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 9264 '�a�,4' :;r I1131 +��.c'1i9;: M1►,ry,:,+�� r:rr 1.4. ,,�r •r"ily� rr! t +°a.' ►rb 'Ii,l+ �tili 'IywJ,i' �6'!f'1� 1 i:4°' 1lm�aci l'r.'A"0.'1:'1 '""F�1'iRl,.�:-.�.:..,1.. .. I „i �,.;nrr,��t�:3"•�4•c...;. s f •11,`� V , • t"At:�7PS+00¢T't►'ra;t�[?:'l4!!'1'A• ,. I: ;Phi ',:�i •1 `,�'.,.; ZSTRICT-NUHBER= 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL ;NO/ OWNERS ZIP PA CEL.NO/.. OWNER! , • ZIP•'r. �s• TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA ' NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA: • NAME -AND ADDRESS Conte 263-045-02 TALLO, STEPHEN E JR 163-043-09 FRITTS, EVELYN M + 1 -046-06 BENBENISTY, BARUCH W 04-007 5312 KENILWORTH OR 04-007 17222 GREENLEAF LN 04-007 17091 GREENTREE LN / HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL I 92647 ,HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL v' 9264p 163-045-03 FERANDELLI, RONALDI 163-044-10 ALLEN, ROBERT J 163-046-07. KIDD, JAMES' W 04-007. 3302 KENILWORTH 04-007 17232 GREENLEAF LN 04-007 .' 27101 GREENTREE IN HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 �,163 •045-0 • TUNSTAL MA Y - 6 C S NS ED 4 L THO S 163F046 O1 OTA HISA 163 04 08 HRI TE EN, T 04-0071: 3292 KENILWORTH DR ' 04-007 5242 WARNER AVE 04-007 17111 GREENTREE LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 263-045-05 HAINES, MARYANN 63-046-02 SUBHERWAL, BOON R 163-051-01 BULLIS, WARREN C : 04-007 5282 KENILWORTH DR i 04-007 17042 GREENTREE LN 04-007 5501 WENDY CIR 9' HUMTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA .92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649' 263-045-06 .OLSON# ROBERT M. ;l, 163-.046-03 BERGLUND, RONALD A / 263-052-02 JENNINGS, GARY L 04-007 526t KENILWORTH DR '' 04-007 17051 GREENTREE LN u 04-007 ' 5512 WENDY CIR' ?^ HUNTINGTN dCH� CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92647 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9t649 163-4045-07 DAWES, DANIEL 163-046-04 SAUNDERS, KENNETH D J 63-051-03 BAILEY, RONALD L .,• •'''04-007 • 5252 KENILWORTH DR 1'; 04-007 17083 ROUNDHILL OR 04-007 5521 WENDY CIR "'f,•,,,,r,'� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649'' �. HUNTIN670H BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH,- CAL 92649 163-045-08 GIZZI, PETER J 163-046-OS MATINAS, STRATTON J 63-051-04 SCHWARTZMAN# HARVEY �• 04-007 5242 KENILWORTH DR , 04-007 17081 GREENTREE LN 04-007 5542 WENDY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92640. HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL ' 92647 HUNTING70H BEACH, CA 92649 .l t I�.. l• �'Lhq,..,pv-.mow wr"w" 'Ih I n"':. Ql' .. 4 .� �� ,. . �� lST CT MI/NBfR� 114A . �'�b1 HUNTINOTON OtACM ClTT „ ' t. ,.I �,. ' ; ,.1, • , PARCEL�'NO/ N R� ... ,ZIP' PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP �1��0/ N I' OWNERS ' F weep. O. ,R, 'j' CbO!l �t ttApd+� A�. MINN TRAv r�,>,�UAMI�tAND" ��mi—, 163-043-96 BRIZENDINE► MARIANNE V 163-044-04 UGLUMI ROONEY H 163-044-11 DUPONT, NALD 41' 1 '.S•. 04-007 17171 GREENLEAF LN 04-007 5292 GLENROY OR 04-007 5261 ILWORT DR HUNTINGTN 8CH/ CAL / 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH CAL 92649 H NGTH BCH CA 92649 1 ' 63-043-27 BASIC@ JOEL 163-044-05 DEPT OF VETS AFFAIRS OF .163-044-1 LESS, RG W�RNE .04-007 17151 GREENLEAF` LN 04-007 STATE OF CAL 04-007 NILWORTH HUNTINGTN BCH* CAL 92649 CASSELL# GEORGE J ✓ �' HUNTINGTON BEACHP CA 92649 '•:w' ! 5282 GLENROY DR HUNTINGTN BCH/ CAL 9264 ' • . � '. tlx : 163-043-28 SCOTTr TED M 163-044-06 TOOMBS, JOSEPH R 063-044-13 0 0 D M ' !+�' ' 04-007 5241 GLENROY OR 04-007 5262 GLENROY OR 04-007 KENILW R HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 9264 M TINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 1163-043-29 DAVIS. JOHN C 163-044-07 HATCH, DONALD M 263-044-14 CHANG, IU 04-007 '5251 GLENROY OR 04-007 17172 GREENLEAF LN 04-007 530 ENIL H OR , HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHr CAL . 92649 HUNTINGTN B H, CAL 91649, IN as ,,,163-044-01 HOIST. IRMGARD F 163-044-08 S P I E_GL6,4W RY 163-044-IS WA00 J EN �•' 04-007 BARTENBACH, IRMGARD F 04-007 REENL AF LN 1 , „ 04-007 5 KENILWO TH OR' ' 5322 GLENROY OR INGTH BC CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON 81 ACHr CA HUNTINGTON BEACH] CA J9164 I I. 163-044-02 CIZEK, GORDON J 163-044-09 BUIET. PH R i 163-044-16 ARP STEV A ' 04-007 " 5312 GLENROY DR 04-+0 A 04-007 321 TH DR J 11 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 HUHTINGTON CH C 92649 HUNT TON EACH, CA 92649.' ' ' 4t JJJ t 163-044-03 PICA, EUGENE P S" , 163-044-10 RSU ICH LE ARID ! 163-045-01 M T IX E A J� �.; I 0 04-0071 5302 GLENROY DR t 04-007 5251 K I R R 04-007 KENIL RTH HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9L649� HUNT 6 BEACH C 9L649 UHTZN6TON CA 92649 ..t i , ,r• -r,.' 4, ,:, ,.n•,:� ;,'.i61.4•,?:It<'?t /!'�Tr.:; 1di'"•t'•v ,? 1, F��il�'1 IA•,6',' �,•I, VP PARClL' NO/, OMN[RS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA, NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS •COD! +163-042-20 LAMPERTSr RONALD L 163-043-01 D'ALESSANDROr .THOMAS 163-043-08 EASON, RICHARD B' 04-007 '17092 GREENTREE LN 04-007 LOUIS TR 04-007 5261 GLENROY OR ' HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL VVV 92647 2123 S BRISTOL ST HUNTINGTH SCH. CAL •91649 SANTA ANA, CA 92704 .263-042-21 HINDUJAr MANOHAR' 163-043-02 HAWES, ROBERT C 163-043- UESTr MIC L 04-007 17082 GREENTREE LN 04-007 5252 VINELAND OR 04-007 172 EAF LN HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 HUN GTN SCF , CAL 92649 163-04t-22-AXVIG9 MAYNARD A 163-043-03 HAYSr WILLIAM L JR 163-043-20 ARC CHAR ES R JR 1 �• • 04-007 17072 GREENTREE LN 04-007 5262 VINELAND DR 04-007 17221 6 LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTH SCH, CAI ; 92649 HUNTIN N BEACMr CA 92649 �163-042-23 '000TTSr ROBERT C 163-043-04 HUSSr ROBERT L 163-043-21 r MAR N yC 04-007;, 17052 GREENTREE LN 04-007 5282 VINELAND DR 04-007 17211 LEAP LN + HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACHr CA 9264 HUNTI TON BEACH,, CA 92649 :' 163-042-24 SUBHERWALr BOON R 163-043-OS SKIPPER, JAMES W . 163-043-22 VENTU L 04-007 .17042 GREENTREE LN / 04-807 .5292 VINELAND DR 04-007 l GoEEN LEAF IN I HUNTINGTON BEACH. C 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 9264 HUNTIN ON BEACH,. CA 92649 i lP i� .• II. I '' il,: � i '.I • +•111'1;•+".I.' 111'!.- :''�•I��`��., ,yr. ., �• I, '. , V ,I•+ •1:� ,r f. I1 .I i,' •, , ,�tp1:. ., '.,i; •, ,„ �`y, .��. '°;163-042-251 BONG, ROBERT 163-043-06 EISELr EWALO t 163-043-23 SEIF B '('? "1 • 04-007 , 1''17032 GREENTREE LN 04-007 16955 CORAL CAY LN 04-007. ENLEAP LN 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH. C 9264 Ti TN BCHr CAL 9264 163-042-26' BRANSTROM, WELLMAN E 163-043-07 'REILLY, THOMAS L 163-043-25 KROMr STANLET 0 047007' : '17012 GREENTREE LN 04-OOy 5281 GLENROY DR ' 04-007 .29441 SURFOALE LN'. HUNTINGTH BCH.r! CAL 92649 I HUNTINGTON BEACH* CA 92649 HUNTINGTH BCHr CAL , 9264 N "tM,'�5,. ��'N't�,�!•��yp�, ►.iY;'j� it' 1;. 'rfL�i' .,,� ��► '� i :r �l".�,.f'y,?, �} �.�; ., I � .L i •Lttif ,►.r„C 'IY4A• , ti .NUNTINRTOK •[ACN C=Type• �.•,i,�; '.YY •�, 1. i_1tw~'��. j t. ✓.iY a,;1.:! i i�!",.',•1!s•. ,phi.. I „�, , ,, • .. `7. PARCEL NO/ ' } OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP' A NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA . NAME AND ADDRE33 CODEi TRA 1. NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 163-034-16 SADLER, JANICE ANN 163-035'-03 KEPPLER► DONALD 6 163-035-10 BLAKE► WILLIAM 04-007 5381 KENILWORTH OR 04-007 5442 KENILWORTH OR 04-007 ' , 5362 KENILWORTH DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 J HUNTINGTNf SCHr CAL 92649 NUNTINGTON BEACH► CA 92649 , 163-034-17' WIGGINS► JACK G I 163-035-04 ALFONSO► ROBERT A 1 163-035-11 DEAL# DONALD W 04-007. 5391 KENILWORTH OR 04-007 543E KENILWORTH DR 04-007 S3S2 KENILWORTH DR` ' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL: 92649• 163-034-1e APPLE INVESTMENTS 163-035-05 RISSE, DONNA MARIE 163-035-12 DUNBAR, DONALD P , 04-00'i DUDLEY* GARY L 04-007 5422 KENILWORTH OR 04-007 „5342 KENILWORTH DR S401 KENILWORTH DR � HUNTINGTON BEACHr.CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL ' ' 92649 "HUNTINGTON BEACH.' CA 92648 }"1,163-034-19 GERACI, JOE' 163-035-06 KONG, SING J 163-035-13 EATON► LARRY R 04-007 '5421-KENILWORTH OR 04-007 5402 KENILWORTH DR 04-007 • 5332 KENILWORTH OR 1' - 'HUNTINGTON BEACN, ;CA 92649 l HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL . 92649 HUNTINGTDN BEACH. CA 92649 I•r,�' i i .. �',•��7�+tT�.^•�4•p7t';.n+�{.'�:.�.':':Fr►.tJt'dFM^"r{stfa ,�", .,. �,363-034-20 MESMER, JOHN F 163-035-07 WOLZ, WILLIAM F 04-007 $431 KENILWORTH OR 04-007 5392 KENILWORTH OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 ! HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 �'}63-035-01 BURNS, PAUL J 163-035-08 DIL.DINEr CHARLES 0 n ! 0 04-007 5472 KENILWORTH DR 04-007 5382 KENILWORTH OR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 , HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 163-035-02 SMITH, ROBERT A 163-035-0.9 PEARSON, ROBERT R' +; 04-007 'S452 KENILWORTH DR 04-007 5372 KENILWORTH OR i MUNTIN6TOH BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 A n)�,,.• ,' 1 r v.bT;,�,��sv,p,Y+nj�.,.,Y.n�,-. ;.,.....wy,, .r.. ,.rti 1• _ •w,..d'/+..�„r._�„ ! 1/•E�)� 1 i• , .J... �2.. . ... 1.1. .t.•'i"i_'.�1.r11WY�i/ .. •��• •,I a..IN ♦ r a YYY�I V• t, w• IY•�• Ir. 0.00� •• Ca,,/Ya.l.wat, /&—ft• ►aa„ J. .►fib, .♦,-�,In LIs'�RSG7: ,NUf1BERz 054A HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY 1',;•�:11 i . eti . r ZIP y 'PARCE L•.NO�t �ARCE1 NO/ OWNERS r Ai ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ' ' TRA NAME AN ADDRESS CODE ' ',, TRA ,I j",. y" '+ <,`I, :, .'NAME;AND'ADDRESS CODE, TRA NAME AND ADDRESS C 163-033-06 AHMANSON TRUST CO TR 163-034-02 BAILEY, MICHAEL S' 163-034-09 CLEMENS, GEORGE N i' 04-007 3701 WILSHIRE BLVD., 04-001 ' 5422 GLENROY OR 04-007'• 5342 GLENROY DR' } '4 SUITE 1000 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL , 92649 , HUHTINGTON, BEACH, CA 92649 'Yir LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 i 1'16.3-033-07 HANSEH# ROBERT P 163-034�-03 LE FORT, PETER 163-034-10 HENNINGER, PAUL W ' r 04-007 27152 'ST ANDREWS LH 04-00 5402 GLENROY OR 04-007 ' 5332 GLENROY OR ' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL' ; 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92+ 49 ;163-,033-08'YOSHIK'AWk, RUPERT K' 163-034-04 SKINN, ROBERT B 163-034-12 HUDSON, JAMES L JR " 04-007- 17172 ST ANDREWS LN; 04-007 5392 GLENROY OR 04-007 5331 KENILWORTH OR +yF HUNTINGTN BCH# CAL 92649 I HUNTINGTN'BCH, CAL 92649: HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92`�j49 , I ttVV"LL++ 163'-033-09 DE CAROLI, OANIEL J 163-034-05 WALLACE, PATRICK M 163-034-12 JARVIS, JOHN R .04-007 17182 ST ANDREWS LN'. 04-007 5382 GLENROY DR +04-007 5341 KENILWORTH OR HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92649 4� �}63-033-20 MC BRIDE, DALE J 163-034=06 BEAMAN, 'JOHN H 163-034-13 THORSON* WALTER L 04-007 17192 ST ANDREWS LN• 04-007 5372 GLENROY DR 04-007 S351 KENILWORTH OR +..� HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 i HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 92649 163-033-11 ANDREWS. JAMES F 163-034-07 BAKER# SAYOKO 163-034-14 ARLOW, WILLIAM J t 04-007 . ; 27202 ST ANDREWS LN 04-007 5362 GLENROY DR 04-007 5361 KENILWORTH OR r HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA ' 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 926 9 ; 63-034-01 ROCHESTER, LEROY 6 163-034-08 PLUMMER, WHITNEY 6 163-034-1S ANDERSON, NEWTON M �` 04-007 . 5432 GLENROY OR 04-007 5352 GLENROY OR 04-007 . 5371 KENILWORTH DR +" HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA' 92649 HUNTIN6TN BCH. CAL 92649 HUNTIN6TN BCH, CAL 926E`49;'• , + •�'' •,1 + ,:.1,1,,.1. ,e„y,... r.,t.,.. r•rr •.tn�•'' 1i ^'+ML •t, ^M y t ' .t ;,PVT'i. •t:,.F'A.#t;, 1 •( �,..,, n '1 „ r +t I*gar*•fir•f��;t'9 r�..c'�,r:a��!��,�;... u'.�i,,/'r,,•tr: .1 '"dG. '1,' � '.1 ,,+ 'i ,•. ''1�1' ..r. , ,. ' �� :1` i�'k1}!'.i:•f';+lii�'j•b�`� ,' y ': J,.- ' i a•�. •�"I i..;+'�/a�t,l i i,t'�eti F,;>/j ��?U'Ai. 1.r4. eve ow •rib• 19• 0-11 D � a.,�0 NY B A •Cr'F , ,., �, EL NO/ ` OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP, PARCEL' NO/ OWNERS m. ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COOS TRA' NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA , NAME AND ADDRESS COD 163-032-40 VALDEZ, ALBERT 0 263-032-47 RESTON# DONALD W " 163-032-S4 GYGI,' KEITH Hit'' 04-007 17232 CAMELOT CIR . 04-007 17071 CAMELOT CIR 04-007 17141 CAMELOT CIR " ;'•?, ' HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL- 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN'BCHr CAL 9264 1. 163-032-41 CNRISMAN, GARY R 163-032-48 MORRILL, GARY L 163-032-5S MOORE, WILLIAM H 04-007 17122 CAMELOT CIR" 04-007 17081 CAMELOT CIR 04-007 171SI CAMELOT CIR MUNTINGTN BCH, CAL' 92649 ,'HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 9264.9 .,4363-03t-42 PHILLIPSr ALVIN E 163-032-49 CASHIER► DANIEL 1 3-01 DE UC61F, FRED�J 04-007 17112 CAMELOT CIR ' 04-007 17091 CAMELOT CIR 04— 7 ' 09 S7 AND "'•� HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHr 'CAL 9264 HUNTI GTN Mr CAL 9264 ('163-03t-43 S'TROUPr JOHN N 163-032-SO BRUNNWORTH, JOSEPH J 16 033-02 Nr OOUGLAS S r• 04-007' 17102 CAMELOT CIR 04-007 17101 CAMELOT CIR 0 —007 1710 ST RENS L �'i,• ,, HUNTINGTH BCH► CAL 92649 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 1 9264 HUNTIN TH B , C 92649 ?''163-032-44 KAWASAKI, KUNIHEI 163-03t—Sl MACHAr GARY PATRIC TR ' 16 033-03 L RTr JEFFRET F �fi�,• '104-007. 27092 CAMELOT CIR' J 04-007 17111 CAMELOT CIR v ? 1 0 007 172, REWS HUNTINGTN 9CHr CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9264 HUNTINGTN B AL 92649 �''I63-03t-45' HALEr MURRAY M ( 163-032-S2 RICHTER, JOSEPH B . I " 16 0 —0 MORTON, VICTO .04-007 17082 CAMELOT CIR 04-007 17121 CAMELOT CIR 1 007 x 171LP AN WS LH �Tl+ : HUNTINGTN BCH► CAL 92649 MUNTINGTON BEACMr CA J 92649 INGT CH, CAI 92649 :163-032-46' D ALESSANDRO, FRANK T 163-032-S3 PICHOVICH, 60HALD G \ 163 33-05 K AYA HI, FRED 04-007 27072 CAMELOT CIR 04 407 27131 CAMELOT CIR V 04- 07 7132 ANDREW IN 1 :' HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 1 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH► CAL 9264 HUNTING CAL 92649 �{ 4 ,(4'� Y� �� il' L !•1y�.•4'I. ' .1' rt• !' N e�" + !�` + l �+rl `r'1 .i�r", J 1 �''�T . 041 , +Lt � e► ;fA. S r 1y ,'.lhit./ ,11+., ;-1`�i�`fJl'� w• is rr'}il��je,�•:a.r,�( F .t. ,L ,.�4 ►" '•f i�'• 'i�• 1 e. << t+,:•;y,: I�r f.,,+ (�y��1.- �, ., '�'.I• , r, ' �,��y ' i • I ', :' .I I' r '' r y,' •�'{(fit" nr !;f4W.Ul.1,BER! 054A riNUNTTI7CTON BEACH CITY' •;fir' RCEL NO/' OWNERS r ZIP 3RCR1.' OWNERS tZIP M R TR NAME ANO AOOR[SS C00 �`"" —TR `"`"+�� .�... SMiA" -I NO ADDRESS ,COD y' 1 -03 9 S RrrHARLAN J 263-032-26 CAMPBELL, THOMAS C 263-032-33 LARSON, OWEN M + 0 07 11 51 T ANDREWS ir`% 04-007 . 27092 PLEASANT CIR 4 04-007 17111 PLEASANT CIR• HU TING EACH CA 649, HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92649 ; HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 : .163-032- PANZI , ILLIAM S 163-032-27 WIEDER, LELAND E LI! 163-039-34 KIEVMAN, CRAIG H 04-007 7152 ?--1�11 �' 04-007 17082 PLEASANT CIR 1 04-007 17121 PLEASANT CIR G BCH, CAL - HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 " 163= -21 TON,' ROBER T 163-032-28 BROOKS, WILBUR R �,. . .. 163-032-35 CURRAN, WILLIAM R `' .. . 04-00 17142 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 17072 PLEASANT ,CIR '' 04-007, 17131 PLEASANT CIR "HUNTINGTN BCH, 264 ) HUNTINGTN BCH, 'CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH. CAL 92649 E�163-03E-22'LA`PRELLE, MORRIS V 163-032-29 HARRIGAN, LOUIS F '1,163-032-36 BAGGETT, WALTER B p 04-007 , 27132 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 17071 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 27141 PLEASANT CIR !�' !• r HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 I HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9264 163-032-E3 KELTER, LEANDER H TR 163-032-30 NICOL, STUART W 163-032-37 STANTON, MILTON TR 04-007, 17122 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 17081 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 17151 PLEASANT CIR 'I.� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 91649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, C 92649 163-032-24 MATHEWSr DANIEL J 163-032-31 THOMAS, RICHARD E 263-032-38 ANNENBER69 MARTIN r 04-00.7 17122 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 17091 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 17152 CAMELOT CIR HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92649 263-032-ZS REINHART, RICHARD E 163-032-32 DIXON, JOHN J ' 163-032-39 RINEMAN, MELVIN G i•,04-007 , .'.17102 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 17101 PLEASANT CIR 04-007 •! 17142 CAMELOT CI X'i r HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649. ; HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 9L649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92649 4...r1 G 166- 4,-osevelt A 9264' 1 C:....�.= q Suzanne _- ,Arland ri�. .. H- .:t ..nc7iton -Beach, rA 42649 D:-" io, Ralph 1 6 2 f.:-ach Lase fl ; nq on Beach , CA 9264 14r:,.-, j4-22 He ; ,_ , . gArieT e 54 i :s-amond ;DrtTQ i Beach, CA 9%649 s 3- v-+4-13 l—P-11WO t.h D. ve L.' 4 i t -� - J. l, 77 R % 3 { s a F i • i j 163-282-03 939-331-16 Riggs Barbara S. Kimes, Joe Scott 4895 Searidge Cir. 4842 Tirara Dr. # 204 Huntington Beach, Ca. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 92649 178-262-14 Wright,, Margaret 7816 Baysinger Downey, Ca. 90241 163-115-01 163-292-37 Sfeir, Francois Palicte, Ananins B 17132 Tiffany Cir. 4852 Curtis Cir Huntington Beach, ca. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 92649 163-123-10 939-331-05 Leahy, Frank Griffith, William H Jr 177 Riverside Dr. 4832 Tiara Dr. Unit 203 Newpoert Beach, Ca. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92660 92649 939-330-01 939-330-98 Walk.-Zr, Jerrv" Felton Latracrna, Louis P L6557 Harbour Ln. 4822 Tiara Dr. #204 Huntington Beach, Ca._: ; �. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 r� - -,3 i 92649 939-330-03 Williar�is, Bruce C. 7735 Newman-,Ave. Huntington. Beach,,. Ca. 92647 939-330-50 Ligoretti, James A. 4752 Tiara Dr. #101 Hunting_ ton Beach, Ca. 92649 939-330-59 Fvans, William F. Jr �V I 4782 Tiara Dr. #101 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 939-330-62 Jones, Melanie Elllen 4792 Tiara Dr. 4101 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 939-330-64 Vanzutphen, Glenda J. 1308 Santiaao Dr. ilewrnort Beach, Ca. 92660 939-330-68 _- Snider, Suzanne 15109 Henley Dr. Westminster, Ca. 92683 Vanzutphen, William P ' 1308 Santiago Dr. - Newport Beach, Ca. 92660 939-330-92 - Harris, Charles J 4792 Tiara Dr. #202 Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 939-330-94 Dovle, Peter D 4802 :^iara Dr. #204 Huntington Beach, Ca. r 92649 rJ, ..� ��h ,�: ------- v :�•I cam, i S r •r _ v \ ✓j 146-062-19 Edward 1.1 Fvans ` 5412 Caliente Dr. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 178-242-03 Shu, Tzuo-Shiou 12945 Berkhanmsted St. Cerritos , Ca. 90701 163-292-01 Salazar, Francisco 17141 Green St. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 933-810-38 -' Ogle, Anna Jean 4975 Bonita Dr. + Huntington Beach, Ca. 92641: 939-330-72 A () Moussafir, Lennv V. (�✓ 4832 Tiara Dr. #101 �� Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649 •''�-a'ACM301/fM CTL 0006897 03-11-86 10:01 PM 1985-86 CITY/DISTRICT PARCEL LIST r PAGE t#303 ? PARCEL NO/. OWNERS zip PARCEL NO/ 1 OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 1;'.933-810-74 HAN, KWANG YOUNG- ' 933-810-81 JASPER. HERMAN 8 933-810-88 GODDARD, 'S WARREN••'' ';•:'04-007 16847 BREAM LN 04-007 489S SHARK OR 04-007 144 FRANKLIN RO �'•}, HUNTINGTON BEACH. 'CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 LONGMEADOWP MA 01106 '.933-610-7S HARLANP BETTY L 933-810-82 STOJAKOVICP 'DIANNE M ' 933-810-89 BROUGH, ALAN J +' 04-007 4915 SHARK OR 04-007 4891 SHARK OR 04-007 426 S LA ESPERANZA , HUNTINGTN BCHP CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 SAN CLEMENTEP CA 9267E 933-810-76 .WEST9 JOHN T 933-810-63 SOBCZYK. ROBERT E 933-810-90 ARMSTRONG, GEORGE A 04-007 5312 E BRITTON OR 04-007 16832 BARRACUDA LN 04-007 1 ANDERSON ST LONG BEACH. CAL 90815 HUNTINGTN BCHP CAL 92649 SURFSIOEP CA 90743 933-810-77 STONE. RICK 933-810-84 MUKANOSP TIM 933-810-91 RIVIERA HUNTINGTON 04-007 4907 SHARK OR 04-007 6875 NEWPORT CT 04-007 CONDOMINIUMS INC I' HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 FONTANAP CA 92335 %NEST. JOHN T 5512/BRITTON OR ' LONG BEACH. CA 90816 933-810-78 JOHNSONP DANA A 933-810-85 SMITH# ROBERTA C 933-810-92 WHITEP MARVIN L 04-007 4905 SHARK LN 04-007 16816 BARRACUDA LN 04-007 4896 SKIPJACK OR HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHP CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCHP CAL 92649 ROBERT C 933-810-86 SOGOIANP SAMUEL TR , ,;933-810-93 FITHIANP ROBERT M '• 933-810-79 BTRNES. I ( . ''.04-007 4901 SHARK OR 04-007 389E SIRIUS OR a 04-007 6S82 RENNRICK CIR � ' HUNTINGTN BCHP CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 1 HUNTING,TON BEACH# ;'CA 9t647 933-810-80 BALAZS, ALBIN D 933-830-87 DE JARNETTE. RONILE I '933-810-94 KELLY#IJANE'L � '•j`� 04-007 4897 SHARK DR 04-007 P 0 BOX 2334 04-007 P 0 BOX 1087 �•k HUNTINGTON BEACH#; CA 92649 HAILEY# ID 83333 ,I HUNTINGTON BEACH# CA ' '92647' 4' 1/►M CTLL 0006898 05-21-86 10:02 P_ 1985-86 CITY/OISTRICT PARCEL LIST PAGE 20304 DISTRICT NUMBER: 054A HUNTINGTON BEACON CITY PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP PARCEL NO/ OWNERS ZIP TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS CODE 933-810-95 GILPIN, DON E 933-830-04 HATTIG, BILL L 933-630-21 TINHAM, PATRICIA A 04-007 5703 LAKIA DR 1 04-001 16837 BLUEWATER LH 04-001 26851 BLUEWATER LN CYPRESS. CAL 90630 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92649 933-810-96 WOJTASZEK, WALTER J 1933-830-05 BULLO, DIANE M 933-830-12 HECK, JOSEPH 0 3RO 04-007 4908 SKIPJACK OR 04-001 16839 BLUEWATER LN 04-001 16853 BLUEWATER LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 i 933-810-97 BROKER FAMILY TRUST 33-830-06 THUET► BARBARA S 933-830-13 BOBBITT, JUDITH A 04-007 12 HUNTER AVE 04-001 16841 BLUE WATER LN 04-001 16855 BLUEWATER LN IRVINE@ CA 92720 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 933-810-98 SALEM, FRANK A 9 3-830-07 WILSON# GEORGE A 933-830-14 GORMLY, JOHN M 04-007 961 SAtint.FW000 04-001 1317 f,REFHFIEI.D AVE 04-001 CVETOVICII, BRAD d A yi I r 933-830-03 ETKA, MARIANNE 933-830-10 BRODY, HAROLD H 933-830-17 CURRENT, DAVID 04-001 16835 BLUEWATER LN 04-001 532 N HIGHLAND AVE 04-001 3115 JULIAN AVE HUM TINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 LOS ANGELES, CA 90036 LONG BEACH. CA 90808 i �'+1 r. •tt' i .r. �� <;"' f .., • �' "�',+ !: "i'•';`�' 'c'c i"'j �• +•1 � 'T'�j4!''4 '�cy!�' c:t +�d ltt+ �, DlftRzCT'NUnelR� Of4A f i'' HUNTINGTON OXACM. CfTr e y C f ' Aq !&OWHERBavN'tR.:�•'p� + 7YpR'irAkEtHd``?t1�l �ti4�1i1�I��1t'102 �RL H /' OWNERS Z1� itA � JNAMiRtANDrA'OOf1E3S CODE TRA NAME AND ADDRESS COOS TRA " NAME AND ADDRESS CO „163-031-13 WATSON, DENNIS 163-032-05 WATTS, KATHLEEN ANN 263-032-11 KIJEWSKI, JOSEPH J'' 04-007 5371 EL DORADO DR 04-007 5382 EL DORADO OR 04-007 17081 ST ANDREWS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH,, CA 9264 163-031-24 H006ES, TOM R . 163-032-06 ONO. CARLEEN B f/ 163-032-13 TOMITA, WILLIAM K 04-007. 5361 EL DORADO OR 04-007 5392 EL DORADO OR '/� 04-007 17091 ST ANDREWS LH 1, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA' 92649 HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL"'. 92649 63-031-25 ANKERSTAR, ROBERT H 163-032-07 LAI, LAN NHU / ' ' i' 163-032-14 NELSON, DARREL 'D 04-007 5351 EL DORADO DR 04-007 5412-EL DORADO DR ��fff 04-007. 17101 STiANOREW4 LN HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ,. , HUNTINGTH BCH, CAL 92649 163-032-01 WEISS, IRWIN i 163-032-08 COPS, GARY R 163-032-15 SIMPSON* WILLIAM F JR 04-007 5342 EL DORADO DR. 04-007 5422 EL DORADO OR 04-007 ' 27111 ST ANDREWS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH;. CA 92649 HUNTINGTN BCH, •CAL 92649 HUNTINSTN BCH, CAL 92649 63-032-02 PIAZZA, ANTHONY P 163-032-09 ANDERSON, MARDENE C .163-032-16 ANDERSON,•'WILLIAM 6, ^04=007' 5352'EL DORADO OR 04-007 17041 ST ANDREWS LN 04-007 17121 ST ANDREWS' LN 2 HUNTINGTON BEACH, 'CA 92649' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINCTN BCH. CAL 92649 J63-032-03 MAC GILLIVRAY, ALAN 163-032-10 REED, GERALDINE L CURTI W183 O�TLURT CH 2 SEK�Att�R'� +?;04-007' 5362 EL DORADO OR. 04-007 17051 ST ANDREWS LN L �4 . . HUNTIN6TON BEACH. CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 264 ;,; UN7INCT0dFAf � '` M49 63-032-04 CHRISTENSEN, EJNAR S JR 163-032-11 HARRIS, CASIMIR J �,163• I ,:. ARLOs f� i 04-007 '' TR 04-007 17071 ST ANDREWS LN . - 0 OOT41p#1 P 312` »�•.� 5372 ELDORADO DR i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649r � �'' ' ORNAL7C Ak, 906 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 +R' ';�; '�1•�'. F �. I i Legal Notice T h e == City of Huntington Beach P R E S C T i y Office of the City Clerk = J-N 2 8 P. O. Box 190 FIRST CI-AC S M.`�,lii -��' �•S Huntington Beach,CA 92648 s: %�►iiK .iq S-rE*71 : W277381 EiTEEVES'- H912 BRODEA Lip! F Ai_I...SPOOK CA 920 20-934 RETURN 1 CJ SENDER 146-056-05 STEEVES# BRIAN H J t 04-007 5271 HEIL AVE HUNTZ146T0H BEACH# CA 92641 FIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice ` r 7ON -� — City of Huntington Beach �r + office of the City Clerk pp r JAN 2 •P,a P. 0.Box 190 F!!i S 1 r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 s � = • CC YI � r"A �' -•„ ca�-�4 � 1 (�20013N 9Tn , N� AS 4N 263-121-27 GARONERs JOHN L \ t 04-007' 7129 N MARINA PACIFICA dR = LCNG BEACH. CA 90803 FtT�Jf cl� f "c; ' CL 'EMAIL "LmTv4GTOW ItACN Legal Notice pr t. ��<a�roN 1v[ 2 y Win= :ice_ City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk f IR S 1• n � • r x JAN 2 a A = Ci _ . 8 P. O. Box 190 o f. ► i`" ( '�I ' .' Huntington Beach,CA 92648 C ! �A� t Fy0o1397 . �A TA 92646 - 465� 04-Q07 1' T BEACH3IDE ��`� '•�E .N� �. HU HURST.BEACHfI-CA, o1 I''1NTINGTQN BCH, CA HN FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNi1NGTON�EACN Legal Notice PR r N T h City of Huntington Beach ES Office of the City Clerk P. 0. Box 90 FIRS 1 CL ;; !►i :�t = JAN 1 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 - _ , 1 ,,`!- Z D (F�00134T . i 146-041-16 ELLIS, MART A n �✓ 04-007 16382 GOLDEN SATE LN L1-._ -l/� • HUNTINGTN BCH, CAL 92A`, XPD 1.1M��E '�•1228l31A1 hWU • I� ELLS rf Dtll,Wt10D A9L683-�b321 .,�� '�I FIRST CLASS MAIL W :�rMx"sT � r,D ' ,1rryy 70 t�E:NDEFt NUN"W.MN HACH ��•VRM Legal Notice -PM ,To,y City of Huntington Beach 1 p ESVT Office of the City Clerk p �+ '1 25 rA i 9 . P. O. Box 190 FIRS I- Gr I ��1 � ��'f' � �?ga a .N 2 i 'A a• Huntington Beach, CA 92648 jq �a: t _. RPlur!t^(� for ��1 tlnn•71 `_ Z_ ` - 1�8001397 . P...,.�:, t?'h?n r;+�i,;r.l�;••r, :gin„ our lh :;��oticoor p alt3 Stamps 939-330-77 KUENZLER, ANDREAS HERBERT 04-007 TANNEICHENSTRASSE 11 ST GALLEN-9010 , SWITZERLAND F.OREI • I 'a A FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNi1NGTON�FACN I Legal Notice -� n2 ; City of Huntington Beach C'rOffice of the City Clerk ��F:i� • `P. O. Box190 rnC�Huntington Beach,CA 92648 fIR,1T r�--� �,' �j� � 146-601-1i0 TOROSIAN, ARTHUR 04-0.07j 5081 'CRESENL;DR SANTA ANA. ,ti ' 92707., i l lea T FIRST CLASS MAIL MUNnNGTON�EACM Legal Notice �.._..._. _,.. .�_....� 10gr City of Huntington BeachCl p Office of the City Clerk n c P. O. Box 190 F (6 J I. L.Q JAN 2 'c = ,� Huntington Beach,CA 92648 !�;! �� `` P0o1397 . . •• r $ 63:J23-11 SARGENT, JEFFREY J17122 QRVARO , 04-007 HUNTINGTTONABEACH. CA .cHICA t0 92649;1..' LfftooR N�� a« � c l.e^. t• FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNfMGIUN MACH Legal Notice - --_�.,.............�..v.. ...� City of Huntington Beach [� )P1.1 n Y f RI s0Ct: � Office of the City Clerk = , P. 0. Box 190 = JAN 2 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 FIRS C _i @� l l F 10,101J. 397 I 933-810-42 SHAVER, PAMELA ' 04-007 446�-BQIiLLA-6R- i -1tUA1`INGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . II , • �C�,f, 1T,�,SHA 61 0630,4691 FWD TIi'il- EXf'D I,"le SHA VEER 21821 STAR FIRE LANE HUNT BEACH CA 92696-7909� M1MT1NGlE)N�EACM FIRST CLASS MAIL a:zruEtN TO SENDER Legal Notice PR y �,G-1% City of Huntington Beach S O , 9 c" Office of the City Clerk � 2 2 -q g FIRS1* �eI • P. O. Box 190 A„ Huntington Beach,CA 92648 y Z • z (FR001397 --� ,. , ,.. . f:; t�'h r 14b-b01-34 H T PROPERTIES ✓ 90ti7 Y KATELLA AVE y'0edCcfi CA 4-007 ALAp30 Lps 0�!� � , • i1 FIRST CLASS MAIL Nuwr wnw Ww" _ETA Legal Notice roe- City n tip? of Huntington Beach --- r,, -Office of the City Clark :P. O. Box 190 D NO SUCH 1 u.Huntington Beach,CA 92648 D REFUSED �' :e OLDNORACE ACL _ _ _ ( � 'fs' ' L hACA:iT -a;b '.. �.�,.. 007397I OAT L ... 16 '1RR Q9 E,,-R B E R T J Ii.04-007. •. 512 KINGLET CT 59404 _ 'A ,` .GREAT FALLS MT S4, k LA,me LOL-2 FIRST CLASS MAIL HUNTNUM MACH Legal Notice Jl 1 a`'~ City of Huntington Beach x JAN 2 i 'A A s - • Office of the City Clerk FIRST ft 61 't,,, P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 " - 4 (P+.�`' r ; e E00139Ti V w 163-123-01 iIEBARTH, WARREN S 04=007- P 0 BOX 3149 90740 SEAL BEACH, CA ZYE>K49 9925Mli FWD TIME EXPD� ZIEBARTH PO BOX 1359 SUNSET .BEACH CA 90742-1359 RETURN TO SENDER ..-. ; .. FIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice h['I F. \NG1Ory ;, ✓�:�; ...':_-• _-t g S• r) 6fJAN eFCity of Huntington Beach a �1,Office of the City Clerk FI�S�• �l(a 2 i 'RA P. O. Box 190 _ ' v Huntington Beach, CA 92648TLR - 1 178- I UNAI�( ( L) l r:IY O l22-30 N JANES 11UNTIN'TOM WFaI.�V 4 :007 APARTMENTS 17932 . SUITE oKY PARK CIR IRVINE, CAL 92714 oil • - yBy. �7 -P p J 1�IRS LASS'_ A1t'--,. MUNTINCTON$EACH Legal Notice PREFt T City of Huntington Beach ,ILAOffice of the City Clerk FIRST kr I.,f r. P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -- = FP001397 176-222-29 JANES HUNTINGTON,-V 04-007 APARTMENTS V i 17932 SKY PARK CIR �. SUITE 0 IRVINE, CAL 9t1'1 • L6fTo03 o r— < .•r �� JO N ,�;�_'� 7 423 9N.L ! E S 6 R. Z Nyf z ' FM'TURN 7.0 SEN[)C•_R `S; 'gyp o �� NO i CJF�WAFU):I:NG, C)I�DIc:Fi C)N 1=xa_F.� IR ASS`MA..� UNAUI_L•� TO FORWARD NlMTINCTON RACN Legal Notice T d& ov City of Huntington Beach -r Office of the City Clark PREWRT T P. O. Box 190 1 1 p? FIRST GLAS,(. r it Huntington Beach,CA 92648 f.4 T A eabligi t R'4 AL" 4 0 7 1 AtH C 92. 4. V4 In WESFIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach AZ Office of the City Clerk P R E S(3 JAN 2 2 'H 1 145' 3 8 W.. P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 FIRST '1 lj AS,k; P4:V1 �It T ; R �Fso()1397 421-28 LITRIC"s Roeewr m o4-oo7 16521 REGINA CIR APT"4.. ,HUHTINGTH BCH. CAL 92649 41 4"iff FIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice PRESOr'T City of Huntington Beach r JAN 2 2 T o 'I Office of the City Clark FIRST CIAS Huntington Beach,CA 92648 P. 0. Box 190 CAL11 i97 4-0 0 7 6V 7/3AI FW1-) F-Xpl NIS'LJOSEpFj %di ih 16286 p UR ACIFI:(, G -4-13 HUNT E.-c--ACFj -A C 92619-.1861 kE'*j*URN T FIRST CLASS MAIL CTON UAC14 Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach ��-`'• . Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 FI© Huntington Beach,CA 92648 FOP. n ART L ��ISGTV�• r v 0, ,17a-It62-04 LOUGHNAN �^-PA TRYCK \ '04-007 . 8071 SLATER�AVE >E.200 ` HUNTINTON,oA�IICff�'•CA 92647 - 08. 3 13 Is IRS LASS`M-ATL`--.._._.-- Legal Notice �— City of Huntington Beach z JAN 2 .A g 7 Office of the City Clerk FIRST CLA. P. O. Box 190 - -- - • Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ••, �r. f [u. IT ; a ~� 146-ttl-K��',LOU6HNANI� PATRICK V 04-007 %POWERS COURT INV CO �, l�l.. 8071 SLATER AVE '11200 P:•MUNTINCTON BEACMr CA 92647 F ? 7 FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNTprGTON�EACN On- Legal NoticePH E SO T ~ F City of Huntington Beach z JAN 22 P.A _ fob Office of the City Clerk f I R SI' CL'A tiA P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648T oA'- ` CC - ` ' ��' 1 90U1397 . f1�6-121-36.. KWAH', CHEUK'S i ;;1{1r04`007r� ' 16612 REGINA CIR' ;-HUNTINGTON BEACH o CA' '92649.,. \ I/ FIRST CLASS MAIL MJNTbdG10N QACN IEEE ' �Tol* Legal Notice `' ` ti �� City of Huntington Beach FIRS i �r y i JAN p Office of the CityClerk P. O. Box 190 —�•.t Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ,q L R J • 163=281-25 MANSFIELO, C STE*N'- '.04-007.,.- 491,1 L03 PATIOS AV `,'. HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92649 HE3 FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNT1NGlON eEACN , Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach ,:S Office of the City Clerk P R;� ,0 E i 9 �--' P. 0. Box 190 g AA = JA.N2i 'R9Y «7I3 � i $ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 FIRST I L f4 fi! � �r� ;� '" ET = n �F8001357 163-046-08 CHRISTENSEN, TEW'; �;'•� �� ;', 04-007 17111 6REENTREE lG�. ._�`�' t•'r i HUNTINGTON BEACH,, 'CA *2¢�9 r,. K l [LiRJR) to" FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNTINGTON�EACN Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach N T ry Office of the City Clerk PRESORT R` s� �� _.__ • P. O. Box 190 x JAN 2 1 'A s c + Huntington Beach, CA 92648 FIRST • C L A SS M�y 9 .. A!1f t ucT = n I F8001397 w Len Rullo el al o, 17019 Bluewater Lrt-.i: Huntington Bch . , ClkG9`26.4�:_. .- FIRST CLASS MAIL HUNTINGTON 3WH Legal Notice a ��-�� --- N TOH c�;�-•-- _y City of Huntington Beach �a t Jr. F Office of the City Clerk PRESORT Cl , P. O. Box 190 ; JAN 2 i 'H g = C,�iL— Huntington Beach, CA 926U FIRST C I_�S`, AL1 C f �. F800139T . ' �163' 034LOS NALLACE. PATRICK ,K 04-007 5382 GLENROT DR ; ^, = -;� NUUMIGTI4 Mi. CAL%•,;`•, 92649. FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNTINGTON{FACT/ Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 0-4, P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 76 t ?Yy8.242-01 LOUGHNANE ER SUITE . 20Jr HUNTINGTON BEACHr, CA . /I 1 .4"fe 0 FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNMGMN aFACN Legal Notice p N TOJ _ City of Huntington Beach 1- T �c^ S Office of the City Clerk e � JAN z i 'A Y '� • ��~ P. O. Box 190 r C L I :-- E 8 ' C��S 1 s S 8 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 = 8 N001397 . . �w1• ). 11ANE S) CO r INC 2Er'WRP.GRATl:' PAr 9�r7 1."1_;_10", kE.IURA TO SENDER FIRST CLASS MAIL NUNTTNGTON tFACN