The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPublic Hearing - Appeal to Planning Commission modifications OJ, Ie CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Lj2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK March 27, 1991 Terry Galloway 4 Venture #100 Irvine, CA 92718 Dear Mr. Galloway: The Huntington Beach City Council at their adjourned meeting held Monday, March 25, 1991, approved your appeal relative to the Meadowlark Master Plan with conditions. The minutes of the Council meeting will be mailed to you as soon as they are completed. Sincerely, Connie Brockway, CMC City Clerk CB:pm 1 (Telephone: 714-536-5227) : 0 GUARANTEE LIABILITY $100.00 ORDER NO. FEE $NC YOUR REF: 300' VARIENCE REPORT AP# 146-211-01 i FIRST AMMCAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a Corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES JA IV ^ 19Q, BOLSA REALTY DEPARTMENT OF 9340 BOLSA AVE. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEiff.. WESTMINSTER, CA 92683 PLANNING DmSIOM DICKY NERIO herein called the Assured,against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurances herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. Dated: JANUARY 15, 1991 FIRST r7nsky TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY James F. Go Assistant Vice President Directory of Special Services First American Title Insurance Co. 114 E. Fifth Street Santa Ana, CA 92702 714/558-3211 SCHEDULE A PROPERTY OWNER'S NOTICE GUARANTEE 1. That, according to the last equalized "Assessment Roll" in the Office of the Orange County Tax Assessor- a. The persons listed as "Assessed Owner" are shown on the assessment roll as owning real property within 300 feet of the property identified on the assessment roll as Assessor's Parcel Number 146-211-01. b. The Assessor's Parcel Number and any addresses shown on the assessment roll are attached hereto. 2. That, according to the Company's property records, (but without examination of those Company records maintained or indexed by name), there have been no documents recorded subsequent to APRIL 1991, purporting to transfer title to any of the properties listed. Plea J)WiL V I i Y1C� i Sally Graham Helga Schluender 5161 Gelding Circle 16841 Stonehaven Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92W Huntington Beach, CA 92648. Gene & Mindy Noff John Calcagno 5421 Meadow Circle 16672 Parlay Circle Huntington Beach, CA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 92648 Harley Fields 16902 Canyon Lane Cheng-Chie-Lee Huntington Beach, CA 24728 Via Pradera 92648 Calabrasis, Ca 91302 Barbara Winters 16941 Red Park Circle Chet Drahos Huntington Beach, CA 16701 Roosevelt Lane 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Ralph Ricks 5362 Old Pirate Lane Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 H.M. Cain 16975 Ruby Circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Chuck & Kathy Hawksford 5162 Stallion Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Marian Minear 16705 Graham Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Cherie Kormondy 5431 Meadow Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 IDryan & Connie Coburtney 5141 Gelding Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 16,_3 1.22-04 APN: 163-122-05 APN: 163-121-49 • F*-,--..%y F"ong 1 in Wi-m-Ig Majid B. Hari.) Tommy T. Nakachi 7 Glenri 9878 Avenida Mateo 17901 Shamley Circle 11 . 10 Irvine CA 92720 Cypress CA 90630 Huntington Beach CA 92649 APN: 163-121-51 rir:-N. 06 APN: 163-121-50 -tnklin "J. Louis H. Tr Goodyea R. Tire Pe F*r F,aul Y., 1 �. u! St 111<--krys r t i r P.Cl. Bo x 3686 3541 Coo i, d C Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Eieac.h CA 92649 Tustin CA 92681. AF 14- 1.63 -11.21--07 APN: 1 -63121-OE3 APN: 163-121-09 . Stephen F . Downs John W. Westmoreland John W. Westmoreland A-117 17661 Rainglen Lane 17661 Rainglen Lane . Surfside CA 90743 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ............. i............ ............... 163-121-41 APN.- 163-121-10 APN: 163-121-11. APH: HN, Janet T. Moody Janet T. Moody David Czasa 16805 Roosevelt 4641 Los Patos 4641 Los Patos---� :)n CA 92649 'I't i 11 g t 0 1-1 B eR C h CA Huntingt( Beacl Huntington Beach- 92649 HUI 92649 163) :1.22 :1.2 ................... a -el-vt -at lan No. . Developfn( -17011 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach Att. F'r a n k J 11 1.a C 926419 SPN: 146-201-50 APN: 146-201-43 APN: 146-201-51 Robert N. Webb Wilberta Gaiennie Walter F. Schluender. 16831 Stonehaven Cir(.A.(-*r 16832 Stonehvxven 1.6841 Stonehaven Circle Intington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 AM Huntington Beach CA 92649 • :1.46 201--52 APN: 146-201-53 APN: 146-201-54 �31E!i Paul Ogaw,-.t Choong H. Rhee Donald C. Stevenson 16,.`,81 St-oneha.ven Circle Stonehave--n Circic-,? 1687:1 Stonehaven Circle (�; . .1-61-36.1. "3 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 w.rAPNz 146-201-55 APNs 163-046-0:1. Hisa Ota ames Donald Jeffersai 16881. Storiehavc�n Circic,.- ',*5242 Warner Ave. Fluntington Beach CA 92649 Huntingtin Bch CA 92649 U4. 146-601-17 � APN: 146-601-27 APN: 146-601-33 ! , Sh -Willson Winchica Community Water Co Robert G. Vaughn Business Center Dr. No. 1O5 P.O. Box 1O3 1137 E. Balboa Blvd . � _ Irvine CA 92715 ' Sunset Beach CA 90742 Balboa Island CA 92661 i � ^ APN: 146-601-25 APN: 146-601-35 . APN: 146-601-34 . Enrique G. Chang Bijan Haghighat H A T Properties 3922 Sirius Dr., 9512 Netherway Dr., 16882 Bolsa Chica St. No. 100 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92646 ' Huntington Beach CA 92649 / - � � APN: 146-601-32 APN: 146-601-31 APN: 146-601-29 � Bank Orange City Sidney A. Crossley Sidney M. Crossley �is273O E. Chapman Ave. ! 16912 Bolsa Chica St. 16912 Bolsa Chica St. / �^ Orange CA 92669 . Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 / APN: 146-492-37 APN: 146-492-38 APN: 146-492-36 Bernadine J. Kussman Max F. Smith Michael J. Nagle ' 5331 Bonanza Dr. 5332 Bonanza Dr. 5341 Bonanza Dr. � Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 , � � ` / ! � . ` � , / -- r 51"N: 1.4 try .49":.-20 AI-'N u .1.4 -4tF 2 2 y A1- N i -I.•'YG)....492-...x-1. Douglas Young Jeanne Welsh Davis Trust Margaret t A. Henderson 4949 Warner Ave., 16942 Canyon Lane 16951 Canyon Lane Huntington CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92 649 i Hun Ling to Lich CA 92649 At-'N; 146....492_..27 AF'hl; 146....49::.....22 Harriet K. Layne John Terry Spence Martin R. Greenhalgh 1.6952 Canyon I.-<:arie 1.6961. Canyon I...ane 16962 Canyon Lane Huntington Beach CA Huntington Beach CA 9 649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 +: i tPN: 146-_492_..23 APN: 1.46--•492--•2 5 APN: 1.46--492--24 K:i.r-l- R. Ouaack Ruthe E. Teeter Gordon 0. Smith 16971 Canton Laney 16972 Canyon Lane 16981 Canyon Lane Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hu n ting't.n Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 : r APN: 1.46- 043-42 APN: 1 46-043-.-41- APN: 1.46--043--•40 Anthony 0.. I--eaver:lo Ruben A. Armend ar:i.x Stephen R. Braddon 51.91. Heil Ave.. 5201. Heil Ave 5211 Heil. Ave.. #' Hun-tingtn Bch CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Hun•ti.ng•tn Inch CA 92649 APM: 146--043---39 APN:: L 46-•-043- 8 APN;: 146-•043--37 Steven A. Young X{i••uc::e KG-av:in Anthony Barone 5221. Heil. Ave.. 5231. N•Ie:i.l. Ave.. 5241 Heil. Ave. ,►• Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Leach CA 92649 ` APN:: :1.46-0.`56...04 APN: :1.46....0 5{r,...0 5 APN: 1.46••-0 56- 06 Peggy Ann Hoober man Austin [ .. Berry t1a- oy T . Scott 5251 Heil Ave. F 5271 Heil Ave.. 5281. Heil Ave.. 1••luri ti.ng-l-on Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 I-•lun t.ingtn Bch CA 92649 Density bonuses within individual product types may be granted, however the total number of units for the entire project shall not exceed 600. Bedrooms/Unit The maximum number of bedrooms (see Section 9080.18 of the City Code for the definition of a bedroom) per acre will be established by standards set forth in Article 915, Planned Residential Developments, Section 9150.4 of the City Code: 9150.4 Maximum density. Maximum density shall be as shown in the following chart. For the purpose of calculating density, acreage shall include area to the centerline of abutting street right—of—way; but not to exceed 7.5 percent of the net area. Maximum Units Maximum Bedrooms District per acre per acre �J Single Family 7 20 Detached Multi Family 12 30 Medium Density Multi Family 20 40 Medium—High Density 2. Parking Within the development, parking will be allotted according to Article 915 of the City Code, Planned Residential Developments Parking standards (9150.17). These conditions will include tandum parking for single family residences. Also, any residential unit that has four or more bedrooms will require .5 parking spaces per bedroom in excess of three bedrooms. Off—street and driveway parking may count towards additional parking requirement. Meadowlark Specific Plan (0631D) 3. Perimeter Buffers a. Adjacent to existing off-site single family development a minimum one hundred (100) foot wide landscaped perimeter buffer will be required, of which 50 percent of that width may be driveway or drive aisle (excluding open or enclosed parking), or 75 percent of which may include attached low density residential units, or 100 percent of which may include detached single family residential units. In all cases, the landscaped area shall be the outer portion of the buffer area. If structures are proposed within the buffer area no structure may exceed a height of 25 feet. 4. Setbacks a. If attached structures are proposed along Heil Avenue, a 50 foot land- scaped setback shall be provided. Single family detached units shall only be subject to the normal setbacks established by the City Ordinance Code. " b. Commercial uses must be set back from residential areas in order to minimize light and noise irr►pacts. Commercial setbacks shall be conditioned according to Article 922, Commercial District C-4 standards with the exception of the eastern perimeter of the proposed commercial center (between the existing Fernhill residential development and the subject site) where building heights shall not exceed 30 feet within 70 feet of the property, and no buildings or service drives shall be constructed within 20 feet of the property line. This 20 foot setback area shall be limited exclusively to landscaping. c. A 20 foot Iandscape setback on either side of the collector street shall also be required for the section of the street bi-secting the commercial center. Meadowlark Specific Plan -11- (O631D) d. The front setback line for the proposed project shall be 50 feet from Warner Avenue consistent with the setbacks depicted in the City's District Maps. 5. Landscaping — The purpose of this is to insure a more pleasant living environment through the use of plants and decorative design elements. a. All setback areas fronting on or visible from an adjacent public street, and all recreation, leisure and open areas shall he landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner. b. All landscaped buffer areas shall be landscaped in accordance with an approved landscape plan. The preliminary landscape plan implementing this requirement shall be submitted along with the application for a Conditional Use Permit(s) and/or Tentative Tract Map(s). The final landscape plan shall plan shall be approved by the Department of Community Development. c. Intensified landscaping may be required adjacent to the commercial portions of the proposed project. 6. All requirements set forth in this Specific Plan shall apply. When a conflict exists between this Specific Plan and the requirements of Division 9, the most restrictive requirement shall apply. O. PARK DEDICATION Park dedication for the proposed project could be used for a greenbelt that would provide access through the development to Gibbs Parks and/or as an area on the western edge of the Park that would be set aside for park parking, providing it does not change the character of the Park. Any proposed augmentation of Gibbs Park will be subject to Community Services approval. - - Meadowlark Specific_ Plan 12— (0631Di P. HOMEOWNER'S OR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — Approval of all development '• 1 `= proposals shall be subject to submission of a legal instrument or instruments setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recre— ational areas, and community facilities. No such instrument shall be acceptable until approved by the City Attorney as to legal form and effect, and by the Director of Community Development as to suitability for the proposed use of the open space areas. If the common open spaces are to be conveyed to a homeowners' association, the developer shall file a declaration of covenants to be submitted with the application for approval, that will govern the association. 1. The homeowners' association shall be established prior to the sale of the last dwelling unit. 2. Membership shall be mandatory for each buyer and any successive buyer. i 3. The open space restrictions shall be permanent. -- 4. Provisions to prohibit parking upon other than approved and developed parking spaces shall be written into the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for each project. 5. If the development is constructed in increments or phases which require one or more final maps, reciprocal covenants, conditions, and restrictions and reciprocal management and maintenance agreements shall be established which will cause a merging of increments as they are completed, and embody one homeowners' association with common areas for the total development. Q. APPROVAL PERIOD — Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 984, Conditional Use Permits, each Conditional Use Permit authorized under this Article shall become null and void within two (2) years unless a final tract map has been recorded with the County Recorders office on any portion of the approved plans within such two (2) year period. Extensions of time may be granted pursuant to the provisions for extending approval of the tentative tract map. Nfeadewlark Specific Plan —13— (063 1 D) 1 r i 1 Meadowlark Property Conceptual Masterplan ' January 28, 1991 ' Prepared for: ' Bolsa Realty 9340 Bolsa Avenue Westminster, California 92683 and Pacific Development Group ' One Corporate Plaza Newport Beach, California 92658 Prepared by: ' Morse Consulting Group, Inc. 4 Venture, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92718 I , TABLE OF CONTENTS ' Description Page INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I LANDUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 CIRCULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 OPENSPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 PUBLIC FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A. Geology; Soils/Seismic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 B. Potential Hazardous Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Archaeology . 21 APPENDICES LIST OF EXHIBITS 1 Exhibit Page I-VICINITY MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 II-CONCEPTUAL MASTERPLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 III-COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 LIV-PHASING PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 V-STREET SECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 & 13 VI-EDGE TREATMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 & 17 VII-PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ii INTRODUCTION The Meadowlark Property consists of approximately 65 acres located within the City of Huntington Beach. The property is situated approximately 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street, between Warner Avenue on the south and Heil Avenue on the north. Please refer to Exhibit I--Vicinity Map. The property was previously used as the site of the Meadowlark Airport. The City of Huntington Beach has previously adopted an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan to designate the Meadowlark Property as a Planned Community. This Planned Community designation is to be implemented through the policies, guidelines and standards outlined in the Meadowlark Specific Plan. The Meadowlark Specific Plan allows for the development of a 15 acre commercial site and several residential densities, not to exceed 600 total dwelling units. The Specific Plan also 1 establishes policies to provide buffers between the Meadowlark Property and existing adjacent development and to outline the internal circulation patterns of the proposed development. The Specific Plan policies also require a phased development program to coincide with sewer and water capacities. To this end, the Specific Plan requires that all development proposals be accompanied by an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and a Tentative Tract Map. Concurrently with the first CUP application, a Conceptual Masterplan for the overall Meadowlark Property is to be submitted. Although there are no formal submittal requirements for this Conceptual Masterplan,the Meadowlark Specific Plan outlines that it should consist of a Masterplan Exhibit and Narrative Text. ' The content of the Masterplan Exhibit and Text are outlined on page 4 of the Meadowlark Specific Plan. In order to facilitate the City's review and to organize the issues into a ' logical order, the Masterplan Text has been divided into the following categories: Land Use, Circulation, Open Space, Public Services, and Environmental Considerations. 1 w Z J Q• w HEIL AVENUE o 1 1 ' 1 r 1 � _ mi 1 1 � W MEADOWLARK ui PROJECT GOLF COURSE cn Q 1 SITE 1 Q U = U r , C7 Q U' 1 J i m r - Ll 1 r _ � 1 I WARNER AVENUE 1 1 i VICINITY MAP ' Meadowlarks Property NOT TO SCALE C O N C E P T U A'L' 'M A'S`T E R P L A N ftlMlaE CONSULTING GROUPEXHIBIT• ENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING LAND USE The Conceptual Masterplan for the Meadowlark Property proposes a 15± acre neighborhood shopping center and several residential uses on the remaining 50± acres. The residential ' uses include single family detached homes, medium density single family attached residences and medium-high density attached condominiums. Please refer to Exhibit II- Conceptual Masterplan. t The Land Use Element of the Conceptual Masterplan proposes a land use configuration 1 which works within the framework of the Meadowlark Specific Plan. A neighborhood shopping center is proposed along Warner Avenue at the southern boundary of the ' Meadowlark Property. The project spine road divides the shopping center into two parcels and provides access through the residential portion of the masterplan. The proposed residential land uses are divided into three major components; Single Family Detached, Medium Density and Medium-High Density per the Meadowlark Specific Plan. The Commercial component is the most well defined component of the Conceptual Masterplan. It consists of a neighborhood shopping center which is anchored by major retail supermarket and drugstore tenants. Additional shops and retail uses totalling 46,500± sq ft are proposed by the Commercial Site Plan. Please refer to Exhibit III-Commercial Site Plan. More detailed information regarding the Commercial Site Plan is provided by the CUP submittal. ' The residential components of the Conceptual Masterplan have not been formalized at a Site Plan level. They will be further defined when subsequent CUP applications are submitted for each residential development proposal. The Single Family Detached component is located adjacent to Heil Avenue along the northern most portion of the Meadowlark Property. This component consists of a minimum ' of 18 acres and is bisected by the proposed project spine road. The major portion of the Single 3 A Z L. SECTION A-A COMMERCIAL ENTRY/PROJECT SPINE ROAD '-CHURCH (R 1) $INGLE FAMILY 'DET"D 17 Jl__`_F-=_ MOBILE HOME PARK MH) SECTION PROJECT SPINE ROAD/PEARCE DRIVE nm J 71 T SECTION C-C ROOSEVELT LANE(SOUTH) NATURAL PARK (CF-R) PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SECTION D-0 ROOSEVELT LANE(NORTH) INGLE FAMILY DETAC /i a.'(-YAC/V/ F 7.0.D.U./AC.,mAi. i SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DETACHED > (R 1) (R 1) B To PEARCE DR--=7=! MEDIUM DENSITY. 20.0 AC. Le 'BUFFER ADUI&C M�- 240 UNITS 100 00- 12 D.U./AC..MAX.' RESIDENTIAL. 0. iol dIr ING DE I?/HE 2 B 7 (142) MEDIUM HIGH bENSITX ' - 240"UNITS ./20 D.UJAC:MAX. F I SINGLE FAMILY 1 - _ _ . -t.]/ 'DETACHED 71 .: (R 1) (R 1) F PROPOSED FUTURE DAY CARE FACILITY 1 I _.-. - - FERNHILL RESIDENTIAL (144) COMMERCIAL J, 'VACANT (OP) NO LEFT TURN Ex IT' A A . COMM CIAL SECTION E-E RESIDENTIAL ENTRY WARNER AVE-- w R SECTION F-F PRIVATE DRIVE CONCEPTUAL Meadavyl, IL ert MASTERPLAN ly 1. NOT TO SCALE J O V, CONCEPTUA TERPLAN Oek*,%MORSE CONSULTING GROUP Pw PLANNING f__ENGINEERING # IlRtTYING EXHIBIT 11 r� �■r �r �r ■r r � r � r �r �r �r r r r r � r I 0 z n FUTURE RESIDENTIAL MEADOWLARK rc..r,y. ,. r.. I I ml. PLAZA ............................................................... 4 �`• I II I II YI y ti 11 •� : i I� _ I II I I i OVERLAND DRIVE •`- VICINITY MAP D MARKET DRUG STORE I I 1 27•.n2 sr v s SHOPS 2 SHOPS 1 SHOPS 1 fll I = AsSo sr i 5.00 Sr 1500 Sr ! J I .. �r .,•'i,r— / % it VACANT I , �, a y, • / / ; I RESIDENTIAL Summary 586.285sf land s oreo SHOPS /u /r+ /✓n• /n /�/+r/ / ilk ? ,), ..... // 122.665s1 gross Dldg area Z I I } Sr *�i /Oi *' �.: *r,n ✓ i 8 3.8/1 land-to-bldg ratio I .1 ! ti / 654 stol is read I++ OFFICE •� r.1M"11//�yyy/ / i�oS.wL1 / -(�' / i,j{j7 / _ I� 659 stalls prov'd I — ./�/ / / /V //�,� /�//1 /��/ /+,/ //�� , / / I I'• — '• � Part rnp QD/ ! HOnTM 1 rrr vvv rrr vvv r v. I I .� lae.7u.l-0.n.1al sell 0 5/1000.541 I "�ys I I III I I I III' Ed I: :000.r-0n�a.o1/ao.a y, L >: o e•r I I 10.000.1-e1. ( 1 12...1. 0 1/100.100 � L ��•,'s•K,v..:1r"1s.'/vr A1g' I—, �. ' _ <_n n}11�._°i Ir.Ie..,rii.v.rml_1O•IN!fY�_I.iL.' - _4�_o r " _ _ _ IItI � I I r.+S,^1HuO,P S•. /1YP.AYD' PADZ SHOP p C i 0 RGUMLAER0N1 wTWooO.$1[-.[eWLInO.Trr[.[.L/aG SR1/LNO O R A (AIFR [MDPnYR1A / S1 0 ITS I0O^ C[L ICE BM1 / A0= 2_ En 7 ISO D —Q - - - -- 1' — — — — — — — -- — �OI1 o.•— — --'— — — --- - - / \ — �— — — — — — — 2 m m WARNER AVENUE —uiuruD r.n.vuri 30 P. IN I= m o m W W 0 V A SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT FOR �y n BOLSA REALTY I .� 9340 BOLSA AVENUE O WESTMINSTER CA 92683 (714y 893-6521 M E A D O W L A R K P L A Z A m m W ARNE R AVENUE MCG H U N T I N G T 0 N B E A C H . C A L I F 0 R N I A archi tects PROJECT ADVISOR: /<..r(+r. . •r PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP :;),;,•, 1 ll PORAiE PLAT ..r..r'..('�..... rrr.•. .,r,+.er fIfYR'OR1 OCn CII. CA 02 87660 '"°"•' D" _ Z (7i.) 760 - 5591 Family Detached component is located to the west of the spine road adjacent to the existing ! mobile home park and existing single family homes. A smaller portion of this component is located east of the spine road just south of Heil Avenue. The Single Family Detached component is proposed as a Planned Residential Development (PRD) with 120 single family homes. The density of this component shall not exceed 7.0 du/acre. The Medium Density Residential component is proposed to the east of the project spine road. i Two products are proposed to address development standards identified in the Meadowlark Specific Plan and to ensure compatibility with existing adjacent land uses. The majority of this residential component is proposed as Medium Density attached development. The 100 ft edge along the eastern boundary adjacent to existing single family detached homes is proposed as single family detached or attached residential at a density not to exceed 6.5 du/ac. The total Idwelling units of the Medium Density Residential component shalt not exceed 240 dwelling units. The Medium-High Density Residential component is proposed to the west of the project spine ' road and directly north of the proposed neighborhood shopping center. Attached condominiums are proposed within this residential component. The maximum total of 240 dwelling units shall be allowed per the Meadowlark Specific Plan requirements. Please refer to Table II for detailed summary of the proposed land uses. Since the precise configuration of the three residential development components have not formalized at this time, the proposed bedroom count and dwelling unit distribution has been estimated. The total residential units shall not exceed 600 dwelling units within the Meadowlark Specific Plan boundary. The estimated bedroom summary by product is indicated in Table I below. TABLE I TOTAL ESTIMATED TOTAL LAND USE UNITS BEDROOMS; ACRES Single Family Detached 120 360 18 tMedium Density Residential 240 600 20 Medium-High Density Residential 240 480 12 TOTAL 600 1440 50 ' 6 r r TABLE II PROJECT SUMMARY LSD USE UNITS ACRES DEl` SM Single Family Detached 120 18.0 7.0 (Medium Density) (240) (20.0) (12.0) Subtotal) (Medium-High Density (240) (12.0) (20.0) Residential RESIDENTIAL 600 50.0 12.0 TOTAL COMMERCIAL -- 15.0 -- PROJECT TOTAL 600 65.0 9.2::]a 1 1 r 1 1 r r 1 1 r 1 A total of 1440 bedrooms per 600 dwelling units are estimated for the residential component. Based on 50 acres of development within the residential component this equals ' 28.8 bedrooms/acre. iThe Meadowlark Specific Plan encourages the provision of a neighborhood child care facility on the Meadowlark Property. This facility has been conceptually located within the Medium Density Residential component along the Project Spine Road, adjacent to the Commercial component. The precise configuration of this facility will be formalized at the ' time of the application for a Conditional Use Permit for the Medium Density Residential component. ' The Phasing Plan for the Meadowlark Property proposes to develop the property generally from south to north. The first development phase consists of the neighborhood shopping ' center proposing two commercial parcels divided by the project spine road. A Conditional Use Permit for the commercial parcels is submitted concurrently with this Conceptual Masterplan. Please refer to Exhibit IV-Phasing Plan for development phasing sequence. 8 HEM.AVE... I ' CHURCH SINGLE FAMILY (R 1) DETACHED ; MOBILE HOME PARK PHASE 4 1 NATURAL PARK ' PHASE-4---'- SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED ' 18.0 AC, '120 UNITS a 7.0 D.U.;AC.MAX. SINGLE FAMILY I SINGLE FAMILY w DETACHED DETACHED > (R7) W (RI) PEARCE DR. ' MEDIUM DENSITY 20.0 AC. � 240 UNITS l 12 D.U.:AC. MAX. 1 RESIDENTIAL c" PHASE 3. 1 (R2) MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY ! fl C 12.0 AC. - } 1 240 UNITS E 20 D.U.:AC.MAX. PHASE 2 E` SINGLE FAMILY < > DETACHED Z.-/ (RI) - i ' - i FE N"r.:LL REc-!CENTIAL I 1 (R4) > COMNIERCIAL r r 15.0 AC. 1 PHASE 1 VACANT a (op) I _ COMN �RCIAL iWAR a ------ — — --- ---- — 7 J 1Vleado� 'p� j] '�I t PHASING PLAN 1 . ylai-k Q j-ert✓ NOT TO SCALE 4F CONCEPTUAL MASTERPLAN �MORSE CONSULTING GROUP ' __ PUNNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING EXHIBIT IV CIRCULATION The Circulation Element of the Conceptual Masterplan proposes both vehicular and pedestrian travelways which are consistent with the intent of the Meadowlark Specific ' Plan. The project spine road provides the main access to the Meadowlark Property from Warner Avenue at Green Tree Lane. This spine road meanders through the neighborhood ' shopping center and northward through the entire property separating the Medium and Medium-High Density Residential components and continuing through the Single Family ' Detached PRD component. The northern terminus of the project spine road at Heil Avenue aligns with Del Mar Lane. Local access to the two attached residential components is provided directly from the spine road. The Single Family Detached component at the western edge of the Meadowlark Property is accessed from the project spine road and from the Pearce Drive extension. The Pearce Street extension has been carefully planned to ' minimize traffic impacts onto the existing Pearce Street. This extension maintains a secondary access the existing single family development located to the west of the ' Meadowlark Property as required by the fire department. Secondary access to the neighborhood shopping center and to the Medium-High Density Residential component is 1 provided at Roosevelt Lane (south) and Leslie Lane. ' No access from the Medium-High Density Residential component is proposed from Roosevelt Lane (north). Improvement of Roosevelt Lane (north) will be required concurrent with the development of that residential component. The proposed project spine road, which provides the major access to the overall master planned community, is an important element to the project not only from a circulation standpoint, but as a thematic design element as well. The street section for this roadway transitions as it flows through the project. From the south at Warner, it begins as a 68 ft paved cross section with a landscaped center median and transitions to a modified 54 ft right-of-way cross section through the neighborhood shopping center. This modified cross section eliminates the sidewalk adjacent to the curb. The pedestrian walkway is proposed 1 along the west side of the project spine road in order to allow for an increased landscaped greenway along this street. This provides for a widened streetscene experience through the commercial portion of the proposed Conceptual Masterplan and establishes the landscape ' 10 treatment which will be continued for design of the spine road as it flows through the residential components of the Meadowlark Property. The project spine road transitions to a standard 54 ft right-of-way cross section with ' sidewalks on both sides of the curb through the residential portions of the Meadowlark Property and intersects with Heil Avenue at Del Mar. The right-of-way for Heil Avenue ' will be designed to allow for left turn lanes at Del Mar and permit on-street parking to remain on the north side of Heil Avenue. 1 Pedestrian circulation within the project area is also considered by the Conceptual Masterplan. Following the standards established by the City of Huntington Beach,all street ' cross sections include a pedestrian sidewalk on both sides of the curb except within the neighborhood shopping center as previously mentioned. The proposed sidewalk location ' and widths are shown on Exhibit V-Street Sections. In addition,the Conceptual Masterplan provides a pedestrian walkway system connecting the existing residential development to ' the west and the natural park along the eastern boundary of the Meadowlark Property. This connecting walkway system is shown conceptually at this time. The precise ' configuration will be addressed along with subsequent Conditional Use Permits for the i residential portion of the Meadowlark Property. ' 11 I 78' R/W 3' UTILITY ESM'T -- 36_5_ 36 5' \ --�~}- - 3' UTILITY ESM'T 1 5' 27 14' 27' 5' WALK 15"� MIN 5°oMIN ' SECTION A-A COMMERCIAL ENTRY/PROJECT SPINE ROAD ' ol54' R/W d 2' P U E - 27' 27' -- 2' P U E ' 7' _ 20' 20' 7' 6' WALK 40' I 6' WALK �� - � �nF��►F-�IFa►ti€IfiP�tirrt�im ti g�_ 0 17' ' SECTION B-B PROJECT SPINE ROAD/PEARCE DRIVE ' 60' R/W ' 30' 30' 8' 22' 22' 8' 44' 0.17' WALK 2% 200^` I'I ' 'Ni WALK L �017' ' SECTION C-C ROOSEVELT LANE (SOUTH) n STREET SECTIONS f i ' Meadowl4j-,ji,f •gperty NOT TO SCALE C0NCEP`TUAT A' STERPLAN ft� IaECONSULTINGGROUP •_ENGINEERING • S1/RvEYING EXHIBIT V a d 2' PUE 26' 52' R/W 26' ' 2'PUE _ 6' 20 f 20' 6' W LA K i~ 40 WALK n.. 3 's o• 0 17 0 17 I� '---1 G- SECTION D-D ROOSEVELT LANE NORTH ' 5' DRAINAGE __ .__._ 50_MIN R/W 5' DRAINAGE & & UTILITY ESM'T. 20' 10' MIN 20' UTILITY ESM'T. (MEDIAN ( I WIDTH VARIES) ' SECTION -O EE RESIDENTIAL ENTRY - - 24, - 12- 12' ' I O SECTION F-F PRIVATE DRIVE STREET SECTIONS ' Nfeadowladilp - pert NOT TO SCALE Is. _ C O N C E P T U A"C'M A S T~E R P L A N ftnJaE CONSULTING GROUP • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING EXHIBIT V b 1 ' OPEN SPACE ' The Open Space Element of the Conceptual Masterplan for the Meadowlark Property is consistent with,the development standards of the Meadowlark Specific Plan addressing the perimeter buffers. iIn the western portion of the property, the perimeter area adjacent to existing single family development,is proposed as Single Family Detached homes. This will ensure compatibility ' with the existing single family development. In the eastern perimeter buffer area, located within the Medium Density Residential component, the Conceptual Masterplan proposes ' attached or detached single family residential development with a maximum density of 6.5 du/ac. This development will provide a transition between the existing single family homes and the remaining proposed Medium Density Residential component. The open space treatment of edge which divides the rear of the neighborhood shopping tcenter and perimeter of the Medium-High Residential Component is an important planning and design consideration of the Conceptual Masterplan. Although it is recognized as an ' important issue, since the Medium-High Density Residential Component has not been finalized at this time, it is only possible to address this at a conceptual level. ' The issue centers around the compatibility of land use concerns between commercial and ' residential development. This concern is addressed at the planning level by situating the highest density residential component adjacent to the Commercial component. This provides a transition of residential development intensity to the lesser dense residential uses ' proposed to the north by the Conceptual Masterplan. At the design level, this issue can be addressed by providing an adequate building setback and appropriate landscape treatment. At the Conceptual Masterplan stage, in order not to pre-constrain any future medium-high ' residential site plan, we propose several cross sections to illustrate the potential edge treatments which will be acceptable in the future design of that residential component. ' Please refer to Exhibit VI-Edge Treatments. These sections convey building setbacks and landscaped areas along this transitional edge between the commercial and residential ' component. ' 14 t ' The common open space areas within the three residential components will include both ' active and passive recreational areas. Although the actual amenity program has not been formalized at this time, it is likely that the attached residential component areas will include community pools, spas, restroom facilities, BBQ, and picnic areas. The PRD ' residential component will likely include a more passive park-like open space area since each detached dwelling unit will have individual private open space within the rear yard ' of each lot. Since the development of each residential component will require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, the City will have the opportunity to review and approve the ' actual proposal for common open space areas at that time. 1 15 5' MIN. LANDSCAPING 1 DRIVEWAY EMPLOYEE PARKING 15' MIN. SETBACK It 6 w� �s i iCOMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL TRANSITION TO MAIN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE i 5' MIN. LANDSCAPING i GARAGE OR CARPORT DRIVEWAY EMPLOYEE PARKING NO MIN. SETBACK i rs r - rCOMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL r TRANSITION TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURE EDGE TREATMENTS Meadowlar-k, r_Qperty � » NOT TO SCALE CONCEPTUAL M`ASJTERPLAN ftn]aECONSULTINGGROUP ENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING EXHIBIT Vl a 5' MIN. LANDSCAPING 5' MIN. LANDSCAPING OPEN PARKING DRIVEWAY EMPLOYEE PARKING (OR -DRIVEWAY) *� z. •l c .p 4 LrC1,�131.• - r COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL ' EDGE TREATMENT FOR OPEN PARKING/DRIVEWAY 1 - - 1 EDGE TREATMENTS 1 Meadowlark Property NOT TO SCALE CONCEPTUAL MASTERPLAN MIMI�SCONSULTINGGROUP G • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING EXHIBIT VI b PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed sewer and water facilities serving the Meadowlark Property have been addressed by the Conceptual Masterplan per the requirement outlined in the Meadowlark ' Specific Plan. In addition, the Public Facilities Element of the Conceptual Masterplan identifies storm drain facilities proposed in conjunction with the development of the ' Meadowlark Property. Please refer to Exhibit VII-Public Facilities Plan for the location of proposed sewer, water and storm drain facilities. The backbone sewer facilities consist of two separate systems. The Commercial component sewers toward the south and connects to an existing 21 in. sewer main in Warner Avenue. tThe residential components are proposed to sewer northward to Heil Avenue connecting to a 15 in. existing main running in that street. The alignment follows the proposed project spine road. ' The backbone water facilities consist of a proposed 12 in. line which follows the alignment of the project spine road connecting to a 16 in. line in Warner Avenue and a 12 in. line in Heil Avenue. An 8 in. loop system aligned generally around the perimeter of the proposed neighborhood shopping center and within the proposed right-of-way of Roosevelt Lane (south) connects the backbone water system to the 16 in. line in Warner Avenue. The backbone storm drain facilities consists of both onsite and offsite improvements. A 36"RCP is proposed to extend from approximately the northern access point to the Medium Density Residential component north to the project entry at Heil Avenue. Offsite, this 1 storm drain will be increased to a 54" RCP in Heil Avenue and continue in a westerly direction for approximately 1800 linear ft to Bolsa Chica where it will connect to an existing 72" storm drain. An additional offsite storm drain improvement is proposed in Warner Avenue to the east of the Meadowlark Property. A 30" RCP is proposed from ' approximately the intersection of Red Rock Creek easterly for approximately 700 linear ft and will connect to an existing 39" storm drain in Graham Avenue. 18 54"RCP t 1800' EXISTING 12" —�W CONNECT TO EXISTING ' 72" RCP IN BOLSA CHICA 15" V.C.P. EXIST. •I ' • CHURCH �) SINGLE FAMILY (R 1) ' LEGEND .i DETACHED 2" • : e - -- SEWER LINE 8' V.C.P. ` ' - WATER LINE - ••••••••• STORM DRAIN '� ' .-- • - � NATURAL( ARK CF-R) SINGLE FAMILY •, I ' DETACHED r 18.0 AC. ' 120 UNITS • r: `(• - , 7.0 D.U.:AC.MAX. • -_::::;� $„ V.Ci P. _ f SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY r B �� '��" DETACHED t.' DETACHED t i�g 1 R ( ) , v (R1) --\ 0 a 112 • 0 1 r MEDIUM DENSITY PEARCE UR-- - -'-:1 20.0 AC. 240 UNITS n' 12 D.U.`AC.MAX. - RESIDENTIAL c' t (R2) 1 .: $" V.C.P. # I MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY 1 D 12.0 AC. 240 UNITS ` y z 20 D.U.:AC.MAX. ' 8" V.C.P. �J ' F = +'" E SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED �`- (R1) �c z 8" 12" it C , -- r� �6" 6„ 6„ COFAMERCiAL ' W ,s 0 AC. „ SEWER W V. 12„ C.P. � — cc U VACANT (pp) Imo. I� - - �� U ! _ 6 —L--� �- _�-- O cr- t I� 1 r A ,RVJG P. 30"RCP — I 6„ .IF_ �!. t � EXISTING 16 i 1 'CONNECT TO EXISTING EXISTING 21 V C.P. - - - - -. 39" RCP IN GRAHAM AVE J , PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN Nleadowlark,f operty NOT TO SCALE CONCEPTUACIA' ASTERPLAN MrMORSE CONSULTING GROUP ' KWPLINNING • FNGINEERING • SURVEYING EXHIBIT VII ' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ' The Meadowlark Specific Plan identifies three environmental considerations relative to the Meadowlark Property - Geology/Soils/Seismicity, Potential Hazardous Materials, and Archeology. The Conceptual Masterplan addresses these issues consistent with the criteria outlined in the Meadowlark Specific Plan. A. GEOLOGY* SOILS/SEISMIC ' The Meadowlark Property is located on the Bolsa Mesa which is an alluvial terrace-a bench- like formation of land carved in alluvium by a stream. Soils encountered throughout the site during a preliminary soils investigation conducted by H.V. Lawmaster & Co., prepared as part of the Environmental Review process, included alluvial deposits of silty clays, silty sands, clayey/sandy silts and, to a minor extent, relatively "clean" sand. Organic soils or peat deposits were not encountered, nor was ground water in any of the borings conducted ' for this report. ' The information obtained from the soils investigation indicates that the property can be made suitable for development for low rise commercial and residential structures using conventional grading procedures. The surface soils are expansive and this characteristic will require consideration in design and construction of footings and slabs on a grade. ' Meadowlark Airport is located approximately 5,000 ft northeast of the Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone for the Newport-Inglewood Fault. The distance from the Special ' Studies Zone removes the site from any specific Zone related considerations. The Bolsa- Fairview Fault is approximately 2,000 ft southwest of the airport. Although this fault is closer to the airport than the Newport-Inglewood, it is assumed to be less of a threat to that area. A recent fault analysis(1986)prepared by Richard Lung,of Leighton and Associates, stated that the Bolsa-Fairview Fault has not been active in geologic historic times (within the last 10,000 years) and is not considered a threat or measurable risk to people and/or buildings in the area. The State Division of Mines and Geology has concurred with this tassessment. ' 20 ' Additional measures as outlined in the Meadowlark Specific Plan will be employed prior to the issuance of building permits. B. POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 1 An onsite inspection and field tests were conducted on the Meadowlark Property by the ' County of Orange Environmental Health Division to determine the presence of any soil contamination. This investigation, which was conducted on April S, 1990, did determine ' that gasoline contaminated soils did exist onsite. A letter from the Environmental Health Division dated June 20, 1990, is included as Appendix A. This letter outlines the investigative measures required by that agency in order to get clearance to commence ' grading operations. These investigative and remediation measures will be carried out to the satisfaction of that agency and verification of clearance will be provided to the City of ' Huntington Beach prior to issuance of building permits. ' C. ARCHAEOLOGY The Meadowlark Property is in an area termed "archaeologically sensitive" by the Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, the regional archaeology clearinghouse. The airport is on the Bolsa Chica Mesa where several prehistoric native American sites have been identified. ' Studies indicate that the sites were shellfish processing camps (shell middens). A site located at the southeast corner of the airport (referred to as ORA-368) was recently ' investigated by Scientific Resource Survey (SRS). The investigation was in conjunction with the Warner Avenue Road Widening Environmental Impact Report/Environmental ' Assessment. Preliminary results of the investigation were inconclusive as to the existence of a shell midden on that site. ' During Phase I of an archaeological assessment conducted by Scientific Resource Surveys (SRS), five areas were found on the Meadowlark Property that contained ground surface shell materials. Based on their surface investigation, SRS recommended a subsurface program to "investigate the nature and content of the shell deposits" in those areas. Phase II archaeological investigations as proposed in the SRS report were conducted during the months of July and August 1990. The results of these investigations are summarized in a letter from SRS dated August 31, 1990. This letter is included as Appendix B. ' 21 i �� i �h�il V H A W a � � � � � � � � � � � � i � � � � � � TOM DRAM DIRECTOR ' U NYY O F L R HEAD H oG�kIU0. A INVIRONMENYAL HEALTH OIV1920N 2 ROBERT E. MERRYMAN,REHS MPH ' DEPUTY DIRECTOR 3 IMOLN CA E MAILING ADDAES9:P.O.BOX 355 SANTA ANA.CA 92702 HEALTH CARE AGENCY PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION June 20, 1990 2009 E. EDINGER AVENUE SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92705 (714)667-3700 ' Art Nario 9430 Bolsa Avenue Westminster, CA 92683 ' Subject, Sail Contamination Located at Meadowlark Airport, 5141 Warner, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 - O.C.H.C.A. Site #90UT110 Dear Mr. Narlo: Based on inspections and field tests conducted on April 5, 1990 it has been de- termined that gasoline contaminated soil is present at the subject location. This Agency is authorized to enforce the State Hazardous Waste and Underground ' Storage Tank Laws and Regulations and, under contract with the State Water Resources Control Board, is responsible for oversight of cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination resulting from unauthorized releases from underground storage tanks. By this letter. you are directed to conduct an investigation to assess the extent ' and significance of contamination at the site specified in the subject above. The objective of this site investigation is to provide sufficient information to evaluate 1) the sensitivity of the site, 2) the potential threat of exposure to humans, 3) remedial actions and/or alternative mitigation strategies. At minimum this investigation should include: ' 1 . A clear delineation of the nature and extent of soil and groundwater con- tamination. ' •2. A hydrogeological characterization including depth to groundwater and, if groundwater is contaminated, site specific determination of groundwater gradient. 3. The proximity to wells and surrounding land uses; and future use of the site itself.4. The potential impacts of contamination to public health and the environ- ment, including the potential for contaminant vapor migration and human ' exposure by inhalation. Please note that clearance of site investigation, remediation or other mitigation activities by any other agency does not constitute clearance from the Orange County Health Care Agency. The California Health and Safety Code, Section 25298 (c) (4) Art Nario -2- June 20, 1990 requires that a person closing an underground storage tank demonstrate to the Orange County Health Care Agency that the site has been investigated to determine if there are any present, or were past, releases, and if so, that appropriate corrective ' or remedial actions have been taken. The investigation must include a risk assessment of vapor exposure for all projects involving a change in land use. The risk assessment must include a determination ' of the excess lifetime cancer risk due to inhalation of vapors from volatile con- taminants, both inside and outside buildings. The risk assessment must be submitted for review and approval by this Agency. ' Additionally, the project site must be properly secured to eliminate safety hazards and prevent public contact with contaminants present at the site. Any site activity which involves the excavation, disruption, collection, treatment, or removal of t contaminated soil or groundwater must be conducted in a manner that precludes public exposure to chemical vapors above background levels. The California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Subchapter 16, Section 2652 requires that the following information be reported to the local agency every three (3) months until cleanup is complete: 1. The results of all investigations completed at that time to determine the extent of soil and groundwater or surface water contamination due to the release. 2. Method of cleanup implemented to date, proposed cleanup actions, and ap- proximate cost of actions taken to date. 3. Method and location of disposal of the released hazardous substance and any contaminated soils or groundwater or surface water (indicate whether a hazardous waste manifest(s) is utilized) . Violation of these requirements are subject to a civil penalty of up to Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) per day. ' Guidelines providing further information relating to site assessment and the site investigation objectives are available upon request. Although not required, an ' initial workplan or study design may be submitted to this Agency for review and comment. Please note that for sites with possible or confirmed groundwater con- tamination, copies of all correspondence, work plans, and reports should be rou- tinely courtesy copied to the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. If you have any questions, please contact me at (714) 667-3719. Very truly yours, ' Peter Peuron Hazardous Waste Specialist ' Hazardous Materials Management Section Environmental Health Division PP:gmj ' cc: Huntington Beach Fire Department Steve Overman. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. . ' ARCHAEOLOGY—PALEONTOLOGY—HISTORY—GEOSCIENCES 5232 Bolsa Avenue,Suite 5,Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Phone:714/898-7877 ' Fax: 714/891-7458 August 31, 1990 ' Mr. Robert Franklin Planning Department ' City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California ' Re: Archaeological Site Ora-368 Meadowlark Village Shopping Center ' Dear Mr. Franklin: Pursuant to a request by Pacific Development Group, Scientific ' Resource Surveys, Inc. (SRS) conducted archaeological investiga- tions on the above-referenced property. The project area was thought to include a small portion of archaeological site Ora- ' 368. The purpose of the present investigations was to verify or negate the presence of an archaeological deposit on the subject property, and if such a deposit existed, to extract an adequate sample of the site to constitute final mitigation ' measures for archaeology so that development could proceed. During the months of July and August, 1990, test excavations, ' including auger drilling and backhoe trenching, were conducted. These investigations resulted in the knowledge that the sub- stantial deposit adjacent to Warner Avenue, which had been previously sampled by SRS, did not extend further north onto ' the subject property. A thin deposit of archaeological midden was apparent within the southeast corner of the property. The deposit was located and sampled by augering; exposed by backhoe ' and the stratigraphy analyzed and mapped; and sampled by hand- excavation. Four column samples were taken, processed through 1/16th inch screen mesh, sorted, and analyzed. ' A sparse amount of sea shell remains (Clam, Scallop, Oyster, Slipper Shell and Moon Snail, ten pieces of small mammal bone, one projectile point base, one Olivella shell cylinder bead, a worked clam drill, one hammer/grinder, and three stone flakes constituted the finds of the excavations. Due to the sparse nature of the finds, mitigation measures were designed in order ' to add some knowledge to the infomation base regarding this site and its use through time. Ora-368lpg.2 1 The site has been the subject of very few radiocarbon dates. Since the nature of the deposit precluded adding new informa- tion, through hand excavation, regarding the subsistence pattern ' of the inhabitants or use of the area through the recovery of tools, a series of radiocarbon samples (18) were taken and submitted to Beta Analytic, Coral Gables, Florida, for dating. ' These dates, when received, will be a definite addition to the information currently known about Ora-368. ' When the dates are recieved <approximately two months) a final report will be prepared on Ora-368 which incorporates all known information about the site. The substantial investment in radiocarbon dating constitutes final mitigation of the sparse ' deposit which exists on the Meadowlark Village Center property. If you have any questions, or need additional information, ' please feel free to call. tSincerely, a,V ' Nancy A itney-Desaute Ph.D. Preside 1 1 1 .J I ( 4 �I i RECEIVED { DEPART.MENT, .a.F, OOMMUKT-Yj PEVELOPME M ...... .. iert ...... PCAHNtfY� �lvisiant 1. ' Owl .. C ea M ....... . .:::.:....... .. .: ........ ...:.... .... . .::. . C O NCEPUAL MASTER _ 7.7 Legal WGTice Cityf Huntington _.._. ,':. '',•i:;; 11 .. Off Beach i� of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 ,� F 11Ap, ! '• Huntington Beach, CA 92648 hN c : ,��,. ,: 9 E : Pl RETURN 3 : :. • �tr`!`ti3P:t i 1 FIRST GLASS MAIL HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Huntington Beach _,... - Office of the City Cierk P. O. Box 190 r` Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (\� ! 1. F 1 �'C]Fit.7�In�•.Ii•i:=� i.i..�-1c c:�.r-�t-.�:..e.�_ i • KU41 2ft"CH CA 920' 15--59-3. FIRST CLASS MAIL *= TuRr� 1-0 = r�r' R HUNTINGTON BEACH I� 'i Legai Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 = Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -' `�✓ s+ lJ' i;'•:; } �i b, J. (p�✓�� hvr��✓-�.-•�-a:. Iil.tl:icrfi Ft,. i ,QI f-J r✓ 1•-.gyp iy � I'I 1.I"I ! I't ..... "I � 1 ,._•.:;,..r Fol. FIRS 1 CLASS MAIL HUNTINGTON 6EACA i L " .7. i� : .ram S_.t�u2".� L{ - 1'ir1tCA_� .r .1.S^ r- r- - �� •.,,L 1'T7++-a:+. ter + ^ - - ►err.~ -ter _.1. s -��_ _ 4.�-t_ r"�+-_sr'�r•-�-_�._:-car.--.� _ I-�Y -_ irr :.o-c.�•"��.,'"�i a:• ' •ate �,.:y"'�' � � "� Office of the City Clerk - 1tY of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 • �7 5� 146-601-27 Winchica Community Water Co. P.O. Box 103 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 ;qua.,- —_ ,��•�.,� Offic of,the City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 146-492-36 Michael :J. Nagle 16862 Phelps Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92649 4 City-of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 146-601-14 Francis J. ,M. King P.O. Box 5971 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-5971 ........... �iw' -r. ,p ,p ,4°°�n'ptr+nx..a,�` •�nwn.,».ei� tqe p,uy w.x.e—n^^t- i;�.awu�z � v^w-m—ci rrs�•r \ SOS S.✓ } 1 l A ✓• } ��: 4' - .: - i f Office of the City Clerk Ini& City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 i r + iJ ' •c ! 1 l 5 .. r Y ! v r 7 1 i•r �-/ s -:+t.�.y r-fit [ - -' - - - '. •t' _L A.(-tG��.F'F' Lk 41 C t--! f°��'`' L f-�t r - _ "'`2<rG4 �µ` -ti.-r. -f- t J l - J - S.- ' . tcr_ter- •a�:�i�j7i si.�;>•rx L�Tx •�` 54�5r.r� rY :cz',cl,•r',..r< -t.. - to—rtS r• x. � t � T- �. t aTM',Y ..--. ^ >,i -�•?yr+:i::.•� Y.3 ) :.r. .f a �,art y[ t.t e.�r.0 <+f=`ye .�.. ..+..r->,.•.:_' r_re .?•-r' r.r ::-�.-.i.;,t:t,.�-.,`f.tr.��r.�r-.Sr-X;F`�•,i}::i�t'�'�.-t_:i(1:•'£'_.�'t_;��'`2-},•z�_`.:r_:c-:<c J'T:- -T`.- a -`t -[ta''�.'t.z. <t'- � ..t;2a'� -Y-.�,"�<z:.�) :�i?.-:.=:'c� Y¢c r`} a • ':r .mot - - ., -' -r it t t t t- � � a .es�trx--`vs•`h��l. -.L 'r=ty r t -, r_r J� '�' �'_ -t ! .- >:�ttYsl- + )C,L .oi'r -_ r •. - Y_. rz- - _,' t -tea r„i r )- `' `ti.'. - �r'�, - * r s t r - ° .z•. �1? c - � '•r- - I �t• )+7•"r "�'�r ��j °s�'.�yTr�r..__ [-1 cc:rt�j- _ �t �r r'r r COX` •�c...x s"��-,c - �c '.'ter- r j .�v.s_:sc•`a z,}JS:'�... s• n ;+ - !rr - :+,tt. s- :i"?ki):�r!n(.' s s- _ _ rq�,�< y+' � � l•'4 c .. � .-~i,�`tr ?r)•<rct')'r;,'J.'�.'_-�.-� r@= _'>.5r=' xt•i �:,f'�ct t 'i i E*>,_t C�•?`�-•1?;''y.�+ _ *y i t -- r 4 _. �'�L.a�_� Y�f�^,l�c.��F��2 Ytv•� .�'t�•��.---•tYtPI'°tT�1"ici�.�� =��'"f".x��) ,�4.rK.- •..ri, '+� _�A�-�.''�:�-'�Cr..2t��-c.'�. a.. 9..i'�? -).iaat.•� _ .k2tW' - -�s3n} +ram=-' �.. _ � -. �� •�� y.. .i::-- ..ri.�'+.�'"'- �rn "�%�i- �� S. - _ J'(r .` ,• ..f,k :rip. r 7:a X�-� -u-' -.. c- ;•��yCi`.r•. Y..ti-.k 3. ..yr;_.);-'• Office of the City Clerk ` �E4 City of Huntington Beach P.O.BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 146-043-41 Ruben A. Armendaliz 6602 Kirklund Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 City of-Huntington Beach ' Office of the City Clerk P. 0. Box 190 � c r Huntington Beach,CA 92648 f f' d t o i IIAR 8 '.n1 , I - Et q®r-,R:9 IJO F13 ►11f # i`� : � FIRST CLASS � HUNTINGTON BEACH MAIL I L �'r f �^ Legai Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City C!erk P. 0. Box 190 y r Huntington Beach, CA 92648 J3 �.i L.i l.l;}'1.::!.!'1 t J '(:(:i!..t ).. • �J FIRST CLASS MAIL HUNTINGTON BEACH u�c-a....,•,, .. r �9 1 : +r�Gm-�s".��'S'�..r y r�v tn4 ra t rs5F zr� "t raw Ys n z d , Y i ? ? " - ✓ ; -f d .+: :y ..,. yr: -wcy-S " .,� y3f � .` nt r^ r S E.. fir - S-"�a�,'S�'")r�.�- +75 t,i'' ' r F 4t" x c t... .a., lr'�":"�iY i ..2 .,. �,. �t'sx� -3 T$'.1.`Y,• {n -. �, i .ram .�crr+ a YA FJ}U 31.;'�d� 4 _,t;i ''?c•�.- 8:. �"'}_t�Z^.- '°'a . Tj �t a �., . T v �>s::� � < ?s:o,j,. �S t..a-r :t �.. a^ r rr�,,.'� .�i�' � 4M��Fa _.�•-- .,��'�r s.: �s.}E..� lr-_ r.a r -��'� . G4' _ Legal Notice a City of Huntington Beach Office of the City ClerkP. 0. Box 190 t L> ,� rr. ��• U rt Huntington Beach,CA 92648 " ...::i - HE IL AVE - 1 CHURCH (R1) MOBILE HOME PARK PHASE 4. Per;.'ry i . , NATURAL PARK ' (CF-R) Lip �HASE'L4"' . Y_ R I SINGLE FAMILY ' DETACHED , 1 18.0 AC, '120 UNITS 1 7.0 D.UJAC. MAX. SINGLE FAMILY 3 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DETACH / (R1) MEDIUM DENSITY ! 20.0 AC. dlD 240 UNITS12 D.U.•'AC-MAX. RESIDENTIAL c PHASE 3(R2) MEDIUM HIGH DENSITPHASE 2I.IILf ED J _ 1 FERNH[LL RE210EIITIAL l iJ (R�i r COMMERCIAL {y 15.0 AC. y r` PHASE 1 VACANI I (OP) COMI. RCIAL _ d '�pe� t '- PHASING PLAN Vleadolyl �1tiN�s C*cNOT TO SCALE C O N C E P T U A L M A S T E R P L A N MORSE CONSULTING CROUP PL.IfVNING •_ENGINEERING • SI/RVEILNG EXHIBIT IV ik J 1 Meadowlark Adjacent Homeowners favor Alternative A as Conceptual Plan 1 Proposal A fairly divides greatest density impact (R-3) on North and South , as well as East and West sides of site . 2 Allows for more direct access to major street lessening need to traverse project (north section of R-3 exits immeadltely onto Hell ) 3 Puts one half of R-3 density Into area with the greatest, and most .nAt.ural. buffers. (85 ft . Heil street plus 50 ft• setback on North - 75 x 300 ft. of church setback on East- 60 ft. & median street on West - park trail and product separation on south) 4 More adequately addresses direct access to park with product separation and setback provision trail space from Spine Rd to park . 5 Proposal A has a configuaration of Pearce extention that more adequately addresses restriction of traffic by providing 2 more turns and minimizing non-resident usage while still accomodating fire access concerns. 6 Pearce configuration also more adequately addresses large product type discrepancy between existing 6,000 sq. ft . R-1 and new 4,500 sq. ft . product type by turning new R-1 to the side and back of existing. 7 Smaller linear footage of highest density R-3 on Roosevelt discourages non-resident parking and pedestrian_, entl'ylexit points... (Rooseve) t and Pearce are already greatly impacted by R over usage of street parking) 8 Alternative A makes sense ... Financially , visually and from a manageability stand point : Unstable economic climate encourages smaller or segmented building phases; water and sewer problems can more easily be addressed with a2 phase R-3 project ; a 120 unit apartment complex is' more visually compat•lble with surrounding neighborhood than one of 240 , and also fosters more of a sense of community within itself ; 9 Alternative A represents a plan that Is more considerate of the concerns; of surrounding homeowners(•who.; have;,;; I arge financial interests)at no cost to developer's plan . , I ltEADOWLARK ADJACENT HOMEOWNERS Westside Neighborhood Status: 1 . Overly impacted already- cars line both sirl-gof Pearce from R-2 occupants -- all units ov,Nr i.nhahi.tod as arr-Fis not rlesign,t��l bedrooms are used as stt,-!h -- minimal number of garages per unit and percentage of th-m rented out to non- reFidPnts -- bootleg units contained in almost every 4 plex -- rental signs constantly up around neighborhood creating day and night viF:ii,T0 blight . 2. Planning Department has and doespallow improprieties to be built , inspected and passed r-gar.dless of codp., --• knows of and allows bootleg units,, i.Ilegal parking in fire lades, illegal. advertizing signs { often advertizi.ng illegal h;i(:helor 1.1nits ) and the illegal renting out ofnor conversion of., garages . Department is inept in monitoring plans , huilding, or on-going code violations to the total detriment of the Pearce and Roosevelt Neighborhood section . 3. Since Neighborhood Watch bulletins clearly illustrate high crime situation existing in quadrant rlirertly west of neighborhood city should avoid duplicating same density si.titat.ion of R-2 and R-3, Developer plan creates this dangerous mix, crhile Alternative A distances heaviest density from over imparted area of Pearce and Roosevelt and separates highest density into 2 more fairly distributed areas . DEVEL0PMENT OF R-3 DENSITY IN PHASE 2 OF i1FAD0i•1L APK PLAN i The Homeowners adjacent- to Meadowlark demand the following be added as conditions of devo-lopmPnt and strictly adhered to : 1 . Buildi.ng ( s ) in P-3 section closest to Pearce and P.nosevelt (North ) shall be oriented to the exist and south with regard to all entries and exits, both pr rlef-:t i-.i an and vehicular. 2 . Building ( s ) height shall be lowest adjacent to Pearce and Roosevelt. and progress in a Goutherl.y and easterly direction when gaining elevation so that bulk is toward Spine Road . 3 . windows and balconies/patios that face Pearce and Pons-i,,lt (North ) street shall he those belonging to bedrooms (NOT living or dining areas ) to lessen noise impact on lower density neighbors .4 . All balconies/patios and stairways G11lll. he t}1e enclosed type that shield storage of tenant items from public view. 5 . No entry/exit gates be located on Roosevelt Lane (North ) unless requested by Fire Department for. safety. Tf such is required it shall be only one ( 1. ) and shall be of the keyed variety that will prevF-nt visitor entry and parking on Roosevelt . 6 . Requirement of twice the amount of set back of building ( s ) from rear fence of R-1 lots on sont:h side of. Pearco, and from sidewalk on East side of Roosevelt Lane (North ) to ensure minimal impact of development on existing neighbors . 7 . Specific and written prohibition of construction traffic. for R-3 area on Pearce and Roosevelt Lane (North ) . S . Inclusion of improvement of the corner of Pearce and Roosevelt in Phase 2 to ensure elimination of eyesore endur—1 by neighborhood for 15 years . when Roosevelt Lane (North ) is curbed, corner plus 20 foot of the southeast side of Pe,�rcn s1�=,11 also be curbed . ..,... ": .. .F ,.,;- ", , .: . ,.. ... .. :.. ..:.::....._ .......,.. .:.. ,, ... ....... l . . .. ..: .. ... t x J 1 Y v .. --iy - ... .. . -. :r x .: -... .. .... .. .. .. ...... .. .::: ,'. .. .:. _ ..'. ... ,::4: : ....a ..i i . ..:. -. r .. .. '...... .r . a .. - - .. ... .. ': .. _ .. ., ... ... .. - • _ . .. .. .,. ., - • .. . .. .. .. , .. �. i 4 Y �` V� t! �:�� .4. 'C1 Q� °`'/ yy 1�":—I1,—....�:.:.,r...�1,:q-I.t.."m1I�".�.�:.:..;—,I':—;.�.:'.�I.".,::-.!:,1i.',:I�-I..,:,��'I-q1,..I:�—I:—.�:.;,w..I:o�_I.—.�L,.1;*.:t:.1��-.'.��.—.'--.1:.'.T:�.1.��,—��t�,—.1�!p!-'....'�'�1.-�v I1..—�-1:.1��`.'..:.--::.,I:'�'.:I,...:'��'�L�.I,...:-...1�.o.::'.-..�.::-:1.',�-.4—.I.�:�..�I!tI.�,I 1:,T: ..�t."��":I——,:*.�,.":,t:..:—.I',1q::1,9..I�..—I:—,�.:-,I�:..I.��-.I:,"�,:*:�..'..:�,.�,..�..:1;.::.'��.I.:I'I.�.,.1��..�.:.I.;.1—..':w�-�-:I..-',.'-.-.��...,1."....I...p—�':::',I'--1%1�.I-I --:1,::�'I 1�—:�—.-�'L-;;��:--�-,--�'.;1',:.':',,vI�:,.�J]::.�-:,Y.'�:.�!.i";.,:::-.�:�—,!I 7:.�—.:,:—�—.:I:",."�-�",',*':.—,-,.--—r,.,(,��,'.1�'f�-:.��,�i.:.�"::.—'.:�'.�.r':'.''�"1.�.'I--..�—;;�-t-�.—:—�'::..-:.�.'�:I:1.!�.1.,""-�.—:�I�.'';'�.—''-:,;`*�,�—.-Z-�:��r'�.;—��'�:1:—'�--�;..1�.1;-�*��.---��—"�,—�I��--;,—"—:�:1—.,- �_-'�;11--�'':1:1—:'-::.:�1;1:�;-�.—.'�..��''..''--::.':'—..-�-'��t!—.'..—:1�T"—.'',:.:-�1--!,':�.:'''="'.':"—::-,-:;:..�.I._-.'.—':.�:::'.—�—"'-I—..1Z_.�1�'-t I:,.,:—!:1-:��:,-—�.�,".:�.�.t,.:...�1tI"��:—:—<::1-.�.—'-—�I-.��,-.-1�-,�II-�.-.z�—I'--':—--I-�—�.-:—;:,"':—,�-.�i��I.1—�.,.'.:'.�1k;i*::.-;��I;"�Z'p..�I.�:�%:..��..,"Io,:',.—-�—*.-'—..�..'�.��-I..,'�:�1.'.I.:I�s1�..�—;VJI I,.��-.�'—.I1..":--z—,r';1,--.,1',,'��-�—I,.''.,;.."�,�,,'-�—-'-�.-/-.1..�—�-'-.--.��.-��'�I—:.,�.1—.t.'.I",--;.."I:--.,�I"I-.;T,�'�,' l 1 ��'� l a0'S . . ,; -: .0 , . _:.• . .. . .. . . . _. .w uW �_.._... _... Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk s '' , . NO Fa P. O. Box 190 �:., �� . ., •., 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ��nr`�� :' � . r 07 n, n O �A' .. ,:,is V :_:, .-1. !..I;.,:;..i. t')%..:t;-r, P 1 11'!c—II l:t+ i1 l.iI R CUR N �` SENDE€� a " FIRST CAL AS d S. CA HVNUNGTON M C" . . . _ . ' . - p.r,... .. d ..- _'•y.-••fir.. ..>r tine Lon Beady _. •. - ty ClerkCA W648 190 pm . it R V�'{�_.44'7i•yl:+i : '�.�Iri:-•iM:a'�_4::.rZ i '^'is-�i :�i.:.::�Ci~_'_ .�... �r� ) L ti.( .'I^'t cL�'.L.:}•µ:� - .J..I t• r�.:'.� �.t•.1...•1 4 Fc r•s" � � t • t -� t �� s t ^+ � ;- � 1;'• t S i'�tS c! 4'i ,.��;�. t i jr.syc—ft; R LTURI N TO SEEN +ER LASS MAIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL BY TERRY GALLOWAY OF MORSE CONSULTING GROUP TO MODIFICATIONS MADE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN THEIR APPROVAL OF THE MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN (Meadowlark Master Plan) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 18, 1991, 7 : 00 PM.. 41411mu" APPLICATION NUMBER: Meadowlark Master Plan 34sh, "W__ftwxw�_ APPLICANT: Pacific Development Group./RichardPJerio APPELLANT: Terry Galloway/Morse Consulting Group/Richard Nerio LOCATION: 5141 Warner Avenue (North side of Warner Avenue approximately 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street) (see map) ZOPJE: Meadowlark Specific Plan REQUEST: Meadowlark Master Plan showing general distribution of residential densities (600 units) , street alignments , trail system and daycare center location . Appeal is to the Planning Commission ' s replacement of Medium-High Density Residential with Low Density Residential for a 100 foot deep strip on the east side of Roosevelt Lane . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Covered by Environmental Impact Report No . 87-2, certified by City Council on February. l,, 1988 . k COASTAL STATUS : Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after March 14 , 1991 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call Hal Simmons , Senior Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk (8876d-1) CITY OF HUNTTNGTON BEACH �JSISSON PROPOSED 0 c F ` c D -�- _T - ------ C F- f FDUµ'LAIIK - •__-__ - _ OR 2 Z7 • - ! - VENTURI Z U i �.. 0 I - Lill MASS?ALL .-... � - Z I i = cc j I CALIENTE DR — MIDDLECOFF HEIL LI FERNHILL T�CR , ST-.LION z EN C F - RD.G C� i - > �- I J J �O - i i N I Area of 1 Appeal v ix F� L—P�q�qpm Ah h�AVEJI IDEA a—L— � Q I a WARNEP, MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN AREA r PUBLIC NOTICE —PUBLIC`NOTICE`I—NU841,�,'NOTI€, I PU661C NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PIOTIC 'i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL BY TERRY GAL LOWAY OF MORSE CONSULTING GROUP TO , MODIFICATIONS MADE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN THEIR , APPROVAL OF THE MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN ,(Meadowlark Master Plan) NOTICE IS HEREBY• "GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center,' 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the _ w date and at - the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 18, 1991, 7: 00 PM Psi APPLICATION NUMBER: Meadowlark Master Plan APPLICANT: Pacific Development Group/Richard Nerio APPELLANT: Terry Galloway/Morse Consulting Group/Richard Nerio LOCATION: 5141 Warner Avenue (North side of Warner Avenue ' approximately 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street) (see map) kg ZONE: Meadowlark Specific Plan REQUEST: Meadowlark Master Plan showing general distribution of residential densities (600 units) , street alignments, , trail system and daycare center location. Appeal is to the Planning Commission' s replacement of Medium-High Density Residential with Low Density Residential for a 100 foot deep strip on the east side of Roosevelt -Lane. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Covered by Environmental Impact Report No. 87-2, certified by City .Council on February 1, 1988 . COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable i ON. FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City _ Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after March 14, 1991. t ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application ^ ' as outlined above. If there are an further `y . questions please call. Hal Simmons, Senior Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH v SISSON R _ PROPOSED O C F C 0 --- —� CF- I\ I 1 I FMEADOWLARK DR zz z z z z z ---- - t I VENTURI i z I z W O K = _ _-lI✓teamr-/.a_'.-M`A-RT SH-ALi—LL w ,_ Q 2 u I 000j0Lk_*AL t f >. W i -i Liay _ _ 0 0 Q m I I' W I m 1 I I i CALIENTE DR MIDDLECOFF I I I I I HEIL ww7w& u I J FERNHILL�r CR s I I I W � srnwoN = C F - R - J y a - I r j ALONG CR sz Area of Appeal WAVERIDER MEADOX CR 1 V Q i _j a I O 1 ` V AWE':R Q 1 i I WARNER. I I r MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN AREA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-12 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14357iNEGATIVE DECLARATION 90-23 (IN CONJUNCTION WITH GENER4L PLAN A14ENDMENT NO. 90-3/ RE UE T: 1 . To amend the ZONE CHANGE NO. 90-3) property fro (REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 92-UNIT CONDOMINIUM/ TOWNHOME PROJECT) Residential ; NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council vill 2. To rezone fr hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 ruin Street, Huntington Beach, California, ;n the Development, date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider t:ie (High Densit statements of all persons who wish --o be heard relative to the Residential— application described below. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Nega 1I DATE/TIME: Monday, March 18, 1991, 7:00 PM Coun f APPLICATION NUMBER: Conditional Use Permit No. 90-12 With Spccial fffff Permits/Tentative Tract Map 14357/Negative COASTAL STATUS: Not ` Declaration 90-23 f`I APPLICANT: Redevelopment Agency and Bijan Sassoun:an ON FILE: A copy of the prop LOCATION: South side of Talbert Ave. , west of Joyful Lane; and Street, Huntingtor south side of Happy Drive between Jolly Lane and Joyful Lane. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are it EXISTING R2-SR (Senior Medium Density Residential) ; R4-SR evidence for Or against the a ZONE: (Senior High Density Residential); and Q-R2-PD Council s action in court. (Qualified Medium Density Residential-Planned else raised at the public hea Development) . delivered to the City at. or I PROPOSED R3-PD (Medium High Density Residential - ?lanned questions please call Wayne ZONE: Development REQUEST: To construct a 92 unit condominiuT/townlome project with the following special permits: 1. To reduce the side-by-side building separation requirement from 55 feet to 20 feet. 2. To allow drive aisle to abut garages for townhomes in lieu of providing 20 foot drivewzys for 50 0 or the units. 3. To allow a 75 foot average dimension for the main r' hfi� — recreation area in lieu of 100 feet. 4. To allow a 28 foot wide access drive for the - townhomes in lieu of a 48 foct wide drive with`.n \` -Y 100 feet of the public street. 5. To allow a 7 to 10 foot front setback along Joyful ]T ( � Lane and the north side of Happy Drive in lieu of a minimum 15 foot setback for pool fencing and the common clubhouse building. I _49�—�� 6. To allow up to 12% ramp slope to the psrkiny structure in lieu of 10%. I ! i I 7. To allow all two story buildings for the townhones f in lieu of requiring 1/3 of the units to be one �. story lower than the remainder of units in the structure. — ' �� - ---I' CF_R Ir ' II Tn•LOR ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is covered by Negative 1 , Declaration Nc. 90-23. � I--I 3 i onTnR:o COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable i;l --� r i :� .I I �� ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the �_:!-- ,,.;,a•,� o,;Eeec OR Department of Community Development, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by t.e 11_ _ r- 5 public. —_ GL BER Ti OR Om ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to a'=tend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Courcil's action in court, you may be limited to raising on:.y those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice. or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please cal: Laura Phillips, Associate Planner at 536-5271. Connie Brockway City Clerk r i Tv nF ul l .I— 1'^ � - - HUNTINGTOi Authorized to Publish Advertisem4rns of all kinds including public notices by Dome of the Superior Court of Orange County, California. Number A-6214, September 29, 1961, and A-24831 June 11, 1963 STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of Orange I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the ORANGE COAST DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: March 7, 1991 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that -he foregoing is true and correct. Executed on mac' 7' t 9 V 1 at Costa Mesa, California. Signature PROOF ,3F PUBLICATION NOTICE OF PUDLI'C HEARING APPEAL BY TERRY GALLOWAY OF MORSE CONSULTING GROUP TO l/ MODIFICATIONS MADE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN THEIR APPROVAL OF THE MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN (Meadowlark Master Plan) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a. public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE/TIME: Monday, March 18, 1991, 7 : 00 PM APPLICATION NUMBER: Meadowlark Master Plan APPLICANT: Pacific Development Group/Richard Nerio APPELLANT: Terry Galloway/Morse Consulting Group/Richard Nerio LOCATION: 5141 Warner Avenue (North side of Warner Avenue approximately 600 feet east of Bolsa Chica Street) (see map) ZONE: Meadowlark Specific Plan REQUEST: Meadowlark Master Plan showing general distribution of residential densities (600 units) , street alignments, trail system and daycare center location. Appeal is to the Planning Commission ' s replacement of Medium-High Density Residential with Low Density Residential for a 100 foot deep strip on the east side of Roosevelt Lane. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Covered by Environmental Impact Report No . 87-2 , certified by City Council on February 1, 1988 . COASTAL STATUS : Not applicable ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk' s Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public . A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111 Talbert Avenue) after March 14 , 1991 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above . If there are any further questions please call Hal Simmons, Senior Planner at 536-5271 . Connie Brockway City Clerk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (8876d-1) 515SON R - - II � IIIII PROPOSED 0. C F C. D F I l i l \ I ... -MEADOWLARK D .-.. .. R J J - Z Z Z Z - J I VENTURI Z I I " `r - 0 .. ..__. W _—;—. __I... G .. U I O MARSHALL ......... - Q I J cr J _ _ Z J J__ Lx co _EA LIENTE OR MIDDLECOFF I I � I � � ' r ` III_1I III 1ii HEIL c 'w"7 I ff FERNHILL ff SCR , � I I J x STALLION J CR ` / �" C C _ R V I ccLor.c w > sz_^ I -- Area of �— I� Appeal WAVERIDER - ME.100. CR _j Ck.. Epnen7:. Ca.. I wJ _j 1 I i V a .: nLAr E::a = - Z. . Q WARNER MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN AREA , � ` _APN: 146-233-74 APN: 146-233-75 APN: 146-233-38 ` Art M. Nerio Art M. Nerio John R. Benadom , 17122 Marina View 9340 Bolsa Ave. 16671 Roosevelt Lane Huntington Beach CA 92649 Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' APN: 146-233-39 APN: 146-233-40 APN: 146-233-41 Donald S. Mc Cann Jake Klingensmith Chester J. Drahos 16681 Roosevelt Lane 16691 Roosevelt Lane 16701 Roosevelt Lane Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 �- APN: 146-233-42 APN: 146-233-77 APN: 146-233-60 Akira Imamura James H. Trotter Dat Hoang Nguyen - 16721 Roosevelt Lane ` 5141 Stallion Circle 5142 Stallion Circle - `- Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ~~ APN: 146-233-52 APN: 146-233-59 APN: 146-233-53 Phillip J. Dyskow Alan Mc Keating Betty B. Guest 5151 Stallion Ct 5152 Stallion Circle 21372 Augusta Ave. '- . � m° Huntington Beach CA 92649 ! Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92646 .------' �----- ------- ----- -----'-------------- ---------' ----' r-' � =~ APN: 146-233-58 APN: 146-233-76 APN: 146-233-54 Charles L. Hawks-ford Raymond C. Le Desma John E. Brady ' 5162 Stallion Circle ' 5121 Stallion Circle �� 5171 Stallion Circle � [ *_ � ~= Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 ~ ~� APN: 146-233-57 APN: 146-233-55 . APN: 146-233-56 ~� John Schuesler James R. Wentz N. A. Crespin -, 5172 Stallion Circle 5181 Stallion Circle 5182 Stallion Circle Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA Huntington Beach CA 92649 v� --' --------------- ----- ---------------'--�-------- --�--------- r-' — APN: 146-201-47 APN: 146-201-46 APN: 146-201-48 Owen L. Mc Lane Grant W. Johnson Shun Wei Yang 16801 Stonehaven 16802 Stonehaven Circle 16811 Stowehaven Circle � Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' Huntington Beach CA 92646 | ---'----------------''-------'-----'----'- � _'-------'----''--'-------'---'--'------- ---- ' wm APN: 146-201-45 APN: 146-201-49 APN: 146-201-44 `~ Mu Pen Chiang Michael A. Butala James T. Ellis 16812 Stonehaven Circle 16821 Stonehaven Circle 16822 Stonehaven Circle x* Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ~� APN: 146-201-29 APN: 146-201-40 APN: 146-201-28 ` Kenji Miyai Sadettin Kuzu Douglas Edwin Mc Cracken 5461 Meadow Circle 5462 Meadow Circle 5471 Meadow Circle ' Huntington Beach CA 92649 � � Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 APN: 146-201-41 APN: 146-201-27 APN: 146-201-42 ` Uldis Dailacis Mary M. Ciddio Gregory John Wiggins 5472 Meadow Circle 5491 Meadow Circle 5492 Meadow Circle Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ` / APN: 146-201-22 ' APN: 146-201-21 APN: 146-201-11 ~ Ralph D. Ricks 1 Charles G. Messig Michael C. Mossler 5362 Old Pirate Lane ' 5372 Old Pirate Lane 283 23rd St. Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92646 ' Newport Beach CA 92660 � , � r APN: 146-201-10 APN: 146-201-18 , APN: 146-201-17 ` Arthur C. Hausen ' Richard P. Kelter ! Kenneth F. Kelter 5401 Old Pirate Lane � 5362 Oceanus Dr. � 5362 Oceanus Dr. / ` . '/ . Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 '/ Huntington Beach CA 92649 ` ~= APN: 146-201-20 APN: 148-201-09 l APN: 146-201-08 � ` Barbara G. Youngblood Hugh E. Seeds ' Leroy A. Graser 5404 Old Pirate Lane 5415 Old Pirate Lane 5431 Old Pirate Lane Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 � APN: 146-201-07 APN: 146-201-06 ' APN: 146-233-46 � / Norman E. Vinn . Robert D. Runyard . Fe R. Springer � 5441 Old Pirate Lane 5451 Old Pirate Lane / P.O. Box 987 , ~' Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 | Paso Robles CA 93447 � � | '- APN: 146-233-45 / APN: 146-233-44 i APN: 146-233-43 � � | William D. Walker �/ Randy Schauer r Eugene A. Carrothers 5071 Pearce Dr. / 5081 Pearce Dr | 5O91 Pearce St . . . =� Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 |� Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 � | / -------__-'-________--- ' APN: 146-233-71 / APN: 146-233-72 |' APN: 146-233-73 � David C. Clark Nathan N. Yacono / John Gustafson � |' 5141 Pearce Dr. � / 49746 Prichard St | P O Box 111 . . . . �Hu ti t B h CA 92649 / Bell-flower CA 90706 / Huntington -. ^ ` APN: 1 46-201.- 2 i 1.46 < 0 !-......6 APNu t 46•-- }..}...31 Games P. Mi.ne3::}.r• � Stanley hc,...enbl.a•t.t. Richard A. Nordin 1.6705 Graham St. 1.6707 Gr••<al•iam St. 16672 Graz Circle �* 1•'h_VI•t•ing to Lich CA 92649 1--lun Ling-tn Lich CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 - APN: 1.46•...x-3_•i-•30 APN::: :1.46_..233....28 APN: 1 r•46-•s'.:i3-•E 9 Gerald D. Floyd Hobert A. Sche-f•fing John 1:. Ha:lclen `" {" Graz Ci.r•c::l.e.:I.r`:.f.}L}�:. C�raz C',:i.r c.l.e 16691. Graz Circle rc:l e 1.66 2 I'iuntin�• •ti-i ?Bch CA '•� 2646 I••Iu-it:i.ng•tori l(iear.:h [:;A 92649 I••1>.u•iting•ton Beach (;A 92649 AF:'I,I:: 1.6::}.._0/42....26 APN: 1.6::—04 _-25 APN: 1.6::—046-02 Wellman E. Brein<s}•t:rom Robert Song Bcadh R. Sulaherwal 17012 Green•tree Lane 17032 Cir•eentrees Lane 1.7042 Cireentree Lane co Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 �= 5• r� fiF'I••I v :1.63:}•-Or4�'--,�.f4 AI='hl:: :L 6::i.._04E}•...{?;:i APN: 1.63...'042-•R',:} Bodh R., 1,3uhiherwal Ronald A. Berglund Robert C. Coutts :1.7042 Oreent:ree Lane 1.7051. Green•tree Lane 17052 Greentrees Lane I-Iuit:i.ng•kori Beach i:.A 92649 I-'Iun•ting•tn Bch CA 92647 Huntington Beach [:A 92647 AF'hl:: :L 6 :?�'1. 0{ AF'I I: :I.f4 x'�`:1.- 0t} APN:: 1.�46-201."-34 Richard 11.. )f Dam Melvin A. :.ray William B. White 5200 F•Ic•-•si.:l. 3261. Druid Lane 540:1. Meadow Circle Huntingtn 1`3c:li [::A 92649 Los Alamitos CA 90720 Huntington Beach CA 92649 `~ Af:'1q.- 146-••2 C):I.-..35 APN; 146-••:'0:I.--::}:5 Steve Moallem Tony T. Yen Thomas Kar•ciois> 5402 Meadow Circle 54:1.1. Meadow Circle P.D. Box 127 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington ton Beach CA 92649 Sunset Beach CA 90742 ✓ APN: 1./46....2O:L....32 , APN: 1.�4f.:�_••:�'t7:1.-••;:i7 APN: 1�46--:�?O1.-•;:i1. Marion Genes Neff David I._eer Steven A. Kormonc:ly 542:1. Meadow Circle 5 422 Meadow Circle 5 431 Meadow Circle Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 APN: 146"••201-3,:-:3 APN: :146-.201.--30 0 APN: 146--201-39 Mark L. Frankel. i Stanley K. Pedersen Jerry A. Rich 5432 Meadow Ci.rc:l.es 5451. Meadow Circle 5452 Meadow Circle Huntington Beach CA 92 647 � Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Q.� ' HpN �0l V APN: 146-201-14 APN: 146-201-24 ' ` City of ton Beach Claud A. Graham James P. Minear P O 7O 167O5 Graham St 167O5 Graham St ~ ^ . . gtn Bch CA 92648 . Huntington Bea 2 Beach CA 9649 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 ' ~ | -'--------------- - - ` ' '----- ---- � -�� - ' � 163-121-25 ! APN: 163-121-24 APN: 163-121---21 Joe D. Itson Stephen F. Downs . Brian J. Yarema 18262 Sharon Lane ' A 117 S.' 1212 S Western Ave. - Villa Park CA 92667 ' Surfside CA 90743 Anaheim CA 92804 APN: 163-121-23 APN: 163-121-22 APN: 163-042-17 Church Universal of Hun-U. Ngton B / Rodolfo Espinoza ` David B. Grover 5111 Dunbar St ' 5121 Dunbar 311 El Dorado Dr. . . Ave.. � . Huntington Beach CA 92649 / Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 ' ^ � r=� APN: 163-042-16 . APN: 163-042-15 APN: 146-233-61 Hans M Borutzki James R Weber Bryan Lee Courtney � . . . | 5321 El Dorado[ St. ^' 5331 El Dorado Dr. 5141 Gelding Circle� ` ' =~ Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 / Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' Huntington Beach CA APN: 146-233-70 `� � APN: 146-233-62 APN: 146-233-69 Jacqueline L. Edwards ` John R. Schuesler ' Ronald E. Roys 7041 Starlight Circle ' 5151 Gelding Circle ' 5152 Gelding Circle e ` . Huntington Bach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 APN: 146-233-63 � APN: 146-233-68 '� APN: 146-233-64 / � Richard L. Graham William J. Honeyman . Robert, J. Perkins 5161 Gelding Circle 5162 Gelding Circle ' 5171 Gelding Circle =° Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 � �. l46-233-67 APN: 146-233-65 APN: 146-233-66 Richard D. Ellis Kirk-.or Yaraciyan � Ralph F. Bowers ' 5172 8elding Circle � 15652 Mayflower Lane 5182 Gelding Circle | ~~ Huntington Beach CA 92642 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 �� . `= APN: 146-201-02 ! APN: 146-201-03 . AF�: 146-2O1-O4 . / City of Huntington Beach / Lawrence Korn Clarence Walter ` ~� APN: 146-492-39 APN: 146-493-20 APN: 146-493-01 ' ' Francis A. Overholtz Dewayne L. Brown Paul L. Potter 5342 Bonanza Dr. 15481 Electronic Canyon 5352 Bonanza Dr. ~~ _ Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 - 146-493-19 APN: 146-493-02 APN: 146-493-03 Clinton R. Hutchison Lloyd F. Gray Earl O. Jones 5361 Bonanza Dr. 5362 Bonanza Dr. 5372 Bonanza Dr. Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ~ APN: 146-493-18 APN: 146-493-17 APN: 146-493-04 Jeffrey I. Golden John J. Bentley June Sporleder 5381 Bonanza Dr. 5391 Bonanza Dr. 5392 Bonanza Dr. Huntington Beach CA Huntingtn Beach / Huntington 92649 � utington Beach CA 92649 ^ . ' ~, APN: 146-493-16 ` APN: 146-493-05 APN: 146-493-15 ` Philip A. Carey Frances L. Chase Gwen W. Leyhe 5411 Bonanza Dr. 19400 Beach Blvd. No. 5B � 5421 Bonanza Dr. ~� Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 . Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 --___- - APN: 146-493-14 � APN: 146-043-31 ` � APN: 146-043-32 � ' James E. Barker Carol Darlene Jacobs Jorge Z. Gonzalez 118251 Wembley Rd. 5192 Caliente Dr. 5202 Caliente Dr. Los Alamitos CA 90720 Huntington Beach CA 92649 i Huntington Beach CA 92649 ` | ' . ' / APN: 146-043-33 APN: 146-043-34 . APN: 146-043-35 ` Jeffrey L. Baragar ! Paul H. Trimmer Richard U. Goo 5212 Ca et l liente Dr. � 5222 Caliente Circe 5232 Caliente Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92649 . Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ` APN: 146-043-36 APN: 146-056-03 APN: 146-056-02 � Fritz H. Oehlerking Donald Milner Minchinton � Kelvin Cox i 5242 Caliente Dr. 3366 Gundry Ave. // 5272 Caliente Dr. � n� Huntingtn Bch CA 92647 ' Signal Hill CA 90807 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 � . /. APN: 146-056-01 ' APN: 146-O55-06 /� APN: 146-O55-O5 � i '| Lloyd A. Braun i Roy L. Gibson i Arthur Tice 5282 Caliente Dr. ' 5302 Caliente Dr. ! 5312 Caliente Dr. . ' , ` Huntington Beach CA 92649 . Huntington Beach CA 92649 i Huntinqtn Bch CA 92649 ` . . ( APN: 146-055-04 APN: 146-055-03 APN: 146-055-02 DVA David Randall Blac� Jimmy C. Wells .5332 Caliente Dr. 5342 Caliente Dr. 5352 Caliente Dr. | &� Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 � Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' � 146-055....O1 APN: 146-062-22 APN: 146-062-21 Harold Jensen Smith Constance C. Foster / Mable M. Webster ` 5362 Caliente 5382 Caliente Dr. 5392 Caliente Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 APN: 146-062-20 � APN: 146-492-09 APN: 146-492-10 ' Martin L. Hoffman Frank H. Kelly Lloyd E. Wilson 5402 Caliente Dr. . HCR 20 Box 1546 16861 Canyon Lane ~~ ` Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Blythe CA 92225 .. Huntington Beach CA 92649 � ,. . APN: 146-492-34 ! APN: 146-492-11 , APN: 146-492-12 , A. , D. Dunkin Christopher Michael Ruiz Timothy M. Duffey 2601 E. Ocean Blvd. No. 405 16865 Canyon Lane 16871 Canyon Lane � Long Beach CA 908O3 � Huntington Beach CA 92647 J Huntington Beach CA � � / . �� APN: 146-492-13 l� APN: 146-492-14 �� APN: 146-492-33 . i ` | Edward R. Day [ Sarah E. Clork { Dorris M. Miller i 16�5 [�>� Lane | 16�1 [�>� L�e 16882 Canyon Lane Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' Huntington Beach CA ' Huntington Beach CA 92649 APN: 146-492-15 / APN: 146-492-32 APN: 146-492-16 � Thomas P. Barrow | George B. Houck Terrell L. Olsen / i 5822 Roxbury Ct. / 16892 Canyon Lan 16901 Canyon Lane ' Cypress CA 90630 / Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 ' � / ! APN: 146-492-31 � APN: 146-492-17 AP` : 146-492-3O | / � .. � . Stanley D. Fields / Sharon M. Casserly . Petronella Arnold 16902 Canyon Lane / 16911 Canyon Lane 193O Stearns Ave. � ' ! "= Huntington Beach CA 92649 / Huntington Beach CA 92649 Orange CA 92666 . � . APN: 146-492-18 i APN: 146-492-19 '� APN: 146-492-29 - / , } Margaret L. Copp | Alan A. Ankerstar , Velna Fierce ` 4001 Figaro Circle / 6792 Corral Circle | 16932 Canyon Dr. | 1 ^ Huntington Beach CA 92649 | Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' rF'N:: 1116 494 0!.5 Pd::'N:: I -16 601 8 1/46 601----19 T. 11 a r k J.. Drowning Robert K. Iloody -c* t St. tos 1.6931 Red Rock Cir -i Pa 1677J. Roosev( .1. 464:1. LoE Hun t i n g-Ln 1-3 -1 CA 92649 lluntington Beach ('A 92649 I.-luntingtan Beach CA 92649 A F'N IZI 6 601 9 A PI%I :1.4 6---601---,38 AF:'I,I:: 146---601.....2:1. Tomas J. & Gretcl-w.-m-i Pitti Robert K. Moody Rob(-:wt K. Moody 16795 Roosevelt Lane 4741 U. , Pa t o s J.6805 Roosevelt I ane No., 1) Flun-tin g ton Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach Cr-) 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 APIq 1/46 601---20 AF:'I,I-. 14660123 AF'I,.I-., 14660124 Kenneth Moody Tan Law Art M. Nerio 16811 Roosevelt St. 17122 Marina View 464:1. Las Patcs 92649 HUntiI-I(jtC.)I-I Bezich ("A Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 4 AF:'N-. I46 492 5 1 AF'N. 146 492---40 1.46--492---50 Charles J. (3ordon Kenneth W. Cook Louise T. Shomak-.er Marion -)y il"C* 1.6922 Ruby Circ*le 5070 Aegina Way 16921 RU I. C .1.e HLM tinq ton B e a c I-i CA 92649 FlUntington Beach CA 92649 Oceanside CA 92056 Al::'I-,I.- 1146 492---41 APN.- 1.46--492--49 APN 146-492---42 Stoi Gloria -ier Beckstrom William D. Flicks Lo i s J. Dorrance 1.6841 Harkness Circle 16941 Ruby Circle 16942 Ruby Circle Flun t i n q ton Beach CA 92649 Hui-1-tington Beach CA 92649 Fluntington Beach CA 92649 AF:'I,I.-. 1146 492 48 AF*1-1-. J.46--492--4*,-; APN- 146---492 47 Winton T. Warner Newton C. La F'ever Joan Bennett 1.6951. Ruby C j.r cl e 1.6952 Ruby Circle :1.6961 Ruby Circle Fluntinqtn Bch CA 92649 VO 0 FILU-ItIngtri Bch CA 92649 -iuntington Beach CA 92649 APN.- 1/46---492-.44 :j AF'N.- 1.46---492--46 AF'[-,I.- 146--492---45 rk Ilatthevi Miller 11. Morris Cain Helen J. Froley 16962 Ruby Circle 16971. Ruby Circle 1.6972 Ruby Circle Itington Beach CA 92649 Fluntington Beach CA 92647 Flunting-U.)n Beach CA 92649 FILU Y. AF'111:: 146 6 0:1. 0 A FII 146 601-29 APN. 1.46601 26 Sid Crossley i Ric-ardo J., & & Sa be 1.1 a i 11ola Development Corporat lion 16912 13olsa Chica Rd. No, 201 E,53 E:. Valley Blvd. No.. 200 17011. Beach Blvd. FlUntington Beac Huntington Beach Co 92649 i San Gabri(-.?I CA 91.776 Att Frank ZT Mola C 92649 r-��-°— �----- -- -- -- �� -�- - � � APN: 146-492-O6 . APN: 146-492-05 APN: 146-492-04 Barbara Anne Lamb Anna T. Young Vaughn Alan Jenkes ' 5311 Overland Dr. 5315 Overland Dr. School | � ' Huntington Beach Co 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Apo New York 9252 ' 146-492-35 APN: 146-492-03 APN: 146-492-02 �� Esther D. Hart Christopher Platt Charles J. Gordon , 5322 Overland Dr. 5331 Overland Dr. 16921 Ruby Circle Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 �. Huntington Beach CA 92649 APN: 146-492-01 ' APN: 146-493-21 ` APN: 146-493-22 - Illa May Kirklen ' Doris C. Nordyke Lynn Gray 5351. Overland Dr. 5361 Overland Dr. 5371 Overland Dr. i / Huntington Beach CA 92649 � Huntingtn Bch CA 92649 ' � ------'-` ' - � ----- i Hul APN: 146-493-23 / APN: 146-493-24 ' APN: 146-493-25 ! / / � Carlyle Haakons Nelson . Jeanne O. Jennings '} David E. Albin .;5381 Overload Dr, . 53p1 Overland Dr, � 5401 Overland Dr, / Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 ' Huntiogtn Bch CA 92649 � � APN: 146-493-26 / APN: 146-493-27 APN: 146-493-28 Brian F. Hitchman / Lillian Chocek Suzanne Cummings 5411 Overland Dr 5421 Overland Dr. ` 5431 Overland Dr. � ..^^ .-.. ^~.. .. . ...^ .-~. ^~.. .. . ...^ ,-~ ^~.. .. . � `~= Huntington Beach CA 92649 / Huntington Beach CA 92649 . Huntington Beach CA 92649 ! APN: 146-493-29 APN: 146-493-30 ' APN: 146-601-12 Solange Stramler James E. Quackenbush !' Claude H. Kouchi ] 5435 Overland Dr. 5441 Overland Dr. 7721 Colgate Ave. � Huntington Beach CA 92649 / Huntington Beach CA 92649 ; Westminster CA 92683 � .. ! � | / CA 92646 Newport Beach CA 92660 Sw trelle H.. Cook F3 Oakmont L,-:%ne 1.6952 Rub- Circle 16922 Red Rock Circle Newport Beach, CA 92660 FILU-1 t i n g ton Bea c h C A 92649 1 FlLtntingtn Bch CA 92649 ! / | � +.r AI N., 146....055....0 AF'•1,In 1.46_-0,55....08 AF'N- 146...055---09 1='.i.c7ri<ait L. I._eI•:.i.,.vich Dean W.. Nonamaker Lila J. Mc Hugh 4872 0,Ahu DI". 5::a1:1. Hell Ave. 16529 Harbour Lane f t7 1.f Hun•tingti-k Bch CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Reach CA 92649 f AF•N.- :1.46-_0::5;5-10 AF'N: 146...055. 11 AF'N: 146-055--12 Albert H. Ward Albert H. Ward Robert W. Kenyon . 41 Fle:ia. Ave.. 5341 Hail Ave j 5: 6�. Heil Huntingtoiti Beach [.A 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Reach CA 92649 AF'hi: 1 �6-06R:.-R AF'N: 146-062--24 AF'N: 146-062 5 l=.ober-t B. Nichols i Thurman G. Wades !toward J. Lott ar ' 81 Heil- Ave.. r 5391 Heil_ Ave. - ._. - - ��- 5401 Heil Ave.. 1• Hun tingtn Bch CA 92649 ii Huntington Leach CA- 92649 y Huntington Reach CAS' 92649 r i AF N 146-211-02 AF•hl: :L 46-062 -26 '' aF'N: 146-601 01� �' lti Corp ofi The Presiding Bishop of T p Carolyn M. Mc Clore r Gladys A.' Little =50 E hlar-th Temple St.. ! 5411 Heil Ave. s` 3651- F'ir�te Circle malt 'Lake- City UT 84150 j,' Huntington Reach CA 92649 Hunt Huntington Reath CA 92649 ,:. � '� `�s� +yz+:-+ :._ c .: �- -. .,:<: t�-_. . �.�;.•- _ � : - sass€.-x 'a .M:aLILt€_. MR AF N 146--601-1.1 `E AF'N„ 1.46-601--02 `'j AF'N e 9 46-601-10 1Javid S. Ei.senman ` Autumn Moon J:nc 11 Esther Ke , „c869 Boa Vista Dr. r 12534 F'acina St. �; F'.n. E+ax, 272 .Costa Mesa CA 92626 ; Cerritoss CA 90701 Cerritos, Ca 90701 s AF•No 146-601-03 j AF'N.- 146--601-09 AF'N: 146-601-04 Gladys A. Little Yuan Allen Yuen--Kuan Donald IF Andrews >4 r '1677f;Mood/ Circle No. C; 16772 Moody Circle No. D 5901 WArner Ave 1�tc� � a 'Hun tington Reach CA 92649 Huntington Reach CA 92649 �� Hunting ton Beach GA 9 49 x i ` AF N; :L46-6Ui.-05 AWN: 14b=bo1-07 .AF'I�I� .146 -601-08 ; E Mike C. Park. ! Surin Sukhu Robert G. .Allison 40.. Elmhurst Pl.. 22882 Via Genoa 2126' E. 7th St. � rfk i3,s E-4 F"ul.lerton CA 9A2635 South Laguna CA 92617 1 Lon Reach CA 90804 AF'N: 146 -E,01-06 AF'N: 146-492-•08 AF'N 146-492--07 1 : - Cecilia C.... I.Lange '� Wayne A Kra.tzar Dennis.r G. IltrJden �a y 3828 Sacramento St., 5;��01. Overland Dr. 5192 Piccadilly Circle S'f Hui ti.ng•ton Reach CA 92 649 Y. Westmansteir CA 9268 ,_ IMF W Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 "- '' � 00 Or-, n I_It.lri I::i.►'ir I:r:;t'i r,�::<��::i.. 5� °k V, r ►+uvra�ctcw.�a, FIRSTrLASS MAIL Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach office of the City Clerk o. I P.O.Box 190 r,,1.>. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 � � I �u r,r'itit :I.,16....60-1._-c _:; 1 _ � f i-•I�!.ry't::i.ri c:i'l:.i:?ri I:{rj<:�t::l-i t:'.rl 9 :'. ,�i`r s FIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach a Office of the City Clark P.O.Box 190 p6Ls p'�^� 07R T Huntington Beach,CA 92648 s MAP, 8 •01 _ I 7 , :;200 CIA ` ' BENT ADDRESS t1 ' _ ;ATTEMPWTED UNKNOWN H NUMBER 4912 8 FIRST'CLSASS MAIL • . - C,1, CA Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk 7,£ x' [Us P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 s•'ZI " = ;°" c t s i to o, r...l. 'moo cl [:,'r1 9 26r49 Y . • FIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 iz `s; Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �� a t::- _�-:: 4'•. . � , Ulm 11/&M FIRST CLASS MAIL Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 "� a� `<` %v� •+� f .'4.i�R�s.�i Alt _ 1� f j� ,t:.'c: ai"<x't'. :Cc:�n :I."l'O:I.:l. Xic:r<ac::l'1 lFt:l.vc:l'>w F•Il.cr�'t::i:�•lc�•t:c:)ri !{e:�;�tic::l. t t •J I''lcA.it t: 92649 • FIRST CLASS MAIL - -,. : _ s � t. a} `, J- -- - .t .. ._ -. -r: _ `-v. f� .. -_... .._..... -. .--- _.... :i- - - - t - - - _ r. v�f _Y a I +02.11,11-0-1111, � '` '' -.r -s- --- ! ayC ..(• 3 - s.e,',,y^ -- 7.{e�--s. -`W. nr .S' 3 E_§ isVRi mi Cy -�.0 EfiMiM#e a3- 4'`_T>tF Ri i+- ,1 a'' huems., h 3- i x�1245r -< 'A x r r' s v` - • 's •y,,. t "`�y- '+ �� _ "` is ` yz;�_` ---�-' '' ,'.'"-. r�-'x- "s� -- , a " - : t'`' trt_� % s x f U..y2 . --iY �64!,ti�fyp., X M_- 7t �- -4 Y - L - �) t - i.i 3 - .<��(S�[•s-•�9. <�}- i ) dxn i 1. f i I L 2 1 f r y _:i i.� t F _, r - c Y - F m P i ' . --: :_ _ .. -1:. F-- ey, x.-.t, - f _ _ - - - .. - - .ic __, .-. _ .. .. ., - - -. _. _ .. .. i:f . - _ - - - x _ p'ft ri { ''- l ..i� I Sh Z -x e F Y }i _ { i F c S T ��t'T a - F - I �. - ice. ; .tt _ g y' x i J ifI�—al,.';.-.;ARq.�-k-'W t.-;--.�"'�-.--'-_��;�-�_.':-.-.k—.Z��-a-,'.'�.'.?f.�.:."�.'-..�,.''-�1�I-:';-I'---.i-- i _f Terry,s .( - - 1 ya. St.dn rt »Sj lC i D- 5, "i t - ' ir.F iJF - i ar is C-�i�'::-,"-.(�.;�;..,.:---:.L-'.—..z-��-):.._��..'-,::..I-_::�-:.- .z-r X - - - -.„L"Y. - - x � n §�,�£. X x i 3 -_4 r. .-r gyp.: _ _ .. - �. _� ...y - Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach -. X t•:�•"'i I Office of the City Clerk 'N i ! P.O.Box 190 ti i_� i t f. i Huntington Beach,CA 92648 r 4 r E ` i i .f: i c) t,zt.t ,gN�. � y�fA 1 1 ° a Aloe 1 E (V I .Omppww. . I / 'L/. gCrV i AS 40 p fRgg , �yquN l sf0�� I 1 qQC r 1 1. W:i.ry r::l•;:i.c::tt +:;t?mnn+rj:i.fi.y UJ< 1�� .1:a . 1 ).c)„ T r:)X {l.:i I �—"'() `I /;JJ I� e � FIRST CLASS MAIL mN eU, J ... . . . `_ . . ... V - ( 1 ...:. ._ ` .. .. -..... . .. . . .. .... .. _ _. .,. i ... ... .;:,. .,.;: .f. ,. .. :. f .: 7 :,. ., .. _ { - :,.I..��,.:.:—.'�.N:�-".;,"!./-;.t:1�,:-.w IF/ -, Fez 4. r t '.: :. +'" P '[...fed 5 ..(� {elf ." ..i 7. r Fr e c z g.. + *. w .... M{ '.. :. -< , ._:, r :.. -.:.zw ......:. h :;!. i c .:':.:, a .•. .:t ,.i..;: F Y .. ... ,., .. .... ,.•_• `, I. ' _ - :. •.e -_ _ .. -n . ,, ., .. .. . . -!--:i , .... '� .:: _ .. ,. t.. .. .. . ... .. - .... .. .. ..- _.... .. , T .. = .1 _ .. , . .i _ ,,,.. _ ... •. -..- , .`. t t .. G {. _. . .. . ._ .. _ _ �_ .t— .. :- .. ._ ,._ ..__.,-._ . .:. ... .... _...: .. ._., .. .. x .. )--C .. t 1( I. n ... ..: _ ti�.v . .. _... .1.;_ .. x . . '..:..1. .:n.: .. .. _ ? _ f ....,. ) . - r '::.., n i L, 1 . l j .. i _ , .. C .-'i... : .:F:. t .I : J 1 :.:, _ ,a _ ._ 4 1. _ti ....... _ r - Legal Notice . City ofi H AiugtoI _� , _..._.. _..._ L "Off o he City Clerk '``", 1 7, C41., _ Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ` i I ^,i - . y _ _( f . . a; i - . , ,� ;;';'. 1.'-,, 1....... fiG::,a t . .;'., FIRST CLASS MAIL ��`��" � ��'�et HUNTINGTON BEACH t I \ J . . ! I Y _ '_ "^' - ,.. : •S. .... _r.. .. .{.... -. A.. . - ... ' t -74- Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office.of the City Clerk P.0.Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 MAR 8 '81 .UJ RET(�R 44 f' :41t.y... :i.:l.:l.SESt:)r1 To , Center- ("A c 2••�• 1. RF0 S FIRST CLASS MAIL � Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk >. .__.:,.:.... ... ,.�. _. .. 'roy\ P.O.Box 190 4,� 6 9 u s p^ Huntington ach,CA 92648 ` 1 Z ZETjj4 .. sEtvw �RpFRF OK 92'1. 0 • Ff-t C .. _ S IViAI�._. 171 Y I a Q L rjEcet V er rLI :t7Y;;trFRK OF PWGR ®UP t ^ PLANNING o ENGINEERING o SURVEYING February 14, 1991 Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Sirs: On behalf of Mr. Richard Nerio, we would like to respectively submit this letter of appeal of the Planning Commission's action on the Meadowlark.Conceptual Masterplan. Specifically,we would like to appeal Condition of Approval Number 1c which reads: lc. The distribution of densities shall be modified to provide a strip of Low Density Residential south of Pearce Drive along Roosevelt Lane North. A proportional acreage of Medium High Density Residential shall be extended northward along the western side of the spine road. Our reasons for objecting to this condition are numerous. We feel that our original Conceptual Masterplan proposal reflects a superior land use plan. First, by proposing the Medium High Density directly adjacent to Roosevelt Lane North,we are responding to the existing development and zoning to the west of the Meadowlark Property. Although the planning commission was lead to think that the adjacent development consists of single family homes, the fact is that there are only two single family homes along that segment of Roosevelt. The majority of the existing residential along Roosevelt is already apartments and more are currently under construction. There are actually about 110-120 apartment units between Bolsa Chica Street and Roosevelt surrounding these two homes. All of that area is zoned R-2 which allows for Multi-Family Residential Development. Condition lc, as approved by the Planning Commission, would require Single Family Homes to be developed on the east side of Roosevelt,across the street from the existing apartments and backing onto the proposed Medium High Density development. The result would be a row of homes which are also surrounded by apartments. We don't feel that these new homes would be well received in the market place. These homes do not represent a transition of compatible land uses nor do they create a"highest and best use" of the property. We would like to have Condition 1c eliminated in order to allow the Medium High Density to remain along Roosevelt North. Secondly, we feel that the Single Family strip along Roosevelt North is not beneficial to the existing residential areas from a parking and traffic standpoint. The Conceptual Master Plan as originally proposed did not allow any access to Roosevelt from the Medium High Density parcel. This allowed for additional parking along the east side of Roosevelt which would benefit the adjacent existing residential neighborhood. The addition of Single Family Development and driveway approaches along Roosevelt would reduce this parking by about 50%. These 10-12 proposed homes would also most likely increase traffic onto Pearce Street causing 100-120 additional average daily vehicular trips along Pearce. Since the original Conceptual Masterplan proposes no access onto Roosevelt Lane from the Medium High Density parcel, this potential traffic impact would be eliminated. 4 VENTURE o SUITE 100 e IRVINE, CA 92718 (714) 753-9011 o FAX(714)753-9227 City of Huntington Beach January 14, 1991 Page 2 Finally Condition 1c would create a Medium High Density parcel which is much more irregular in shape than originally proposed. This will reduce the efficiency of that parcel and would most likely result in an inferior site plan. Also by extending the Medium High Density Parcel northward along the project spine road, we are adversely affecting the aesthetics of that street which is an important element of the overall Meadowlark Conceptual Masterplan. It increases the building massing along the spine road and diminishes the visual aspect of the proposed Single Family parcel. The Meadowlark Conceptual Masterplan is intended as an overall mixed- use community balancing commercial and three type of residential products into individual neighborhoods. To the extent that the visual dominance of the Medium High Density is perceived over the Single Family neighborhood has an adverse effect on the overall Meadowlark Community. For the above stated reasons, we would like the City Council to reconsider Condition 1c and eliminate it, approving the Conceptual Masterplan without compromising its original integrity. We would also request that we be allowed to clarify and/or elaborate our reasons for appeal at the appropriate City Council Hearing. Sincerely, Terry Galloway Morse Consulting Group L l Dick Ne 'o Property Owner i REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION March 18, 1991 Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Community Deve o rment Subject: APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal of the Planning Commission' s approval of the Meadowlark Master Plan. The appellants, Terry Galloway of Morse Consulting Group and Richard Nerio, are appealing the Planning Commission' s modification of the Master Plan which occurred as part of their approval of the Plan on February 5, 1991 . The modification which is being appealed is the Planning Commission' s replacement of Medium-High Density Residential with Low Density Residential for a 100 foot deep strip of land along the east side of Roosevelt Lane. This modification was reflected in condition l .c. of the Planning Commission' s conditions of approval for the Master Plan. This is the only item appealed and therefore, discussion should be limited to that single point . RECOMMENDATION: Motion to : "Uphold the appeal and approve the Meadowlark Master Plan with the deletion of condition of approval l .c. , with findings and conditions of approval as recommended by staff" . Planning Commission Action on February 5, 1991 A motion by Leipzig and second by Newman, to approve the Meadowlark Master Plan with findings and a modification (condition l .c . ) to replace Medium-High Density Residential along the east side of Roosevelt Lane with a 100 feet deep strip of Low Density Residential W L•1:- W W U r: d Plo 5/85 i and extend an equal amount of Medium-High Density Residential northward along the western side of the spine road, passed by the following roll-call vote: AYES: Leipzig, Newman, Ortega, Richardson NOES: Shomaker, Kirkland, Bourguignon ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED ANALYSIS: The Meadowlark Master Plan was one of several entitlements for the Meadowlark Airport site approved by the Planning Commission on February 5, 1991 . Also approved were a conditional use permit for the Meadowlark Plaza Shopping Center and a tentative parcel map separating the commercial site from the remainder of the airport site. The Meadowlark Master Plan was submitted for approval concurrently as a requirement of the Meadowlark Specific Plan. The attached Planning Commission staff report contains a complete description and analysis of the shopping center, tentative parcel map and Master Plan. In essence, the Master Plan was required to be submitted in order to provide a guide for the phased development of the entire Meadowlark site. The Master Plan needs to identify a number of items including; a perimeter buffer alignment, location of walkways, vehicular circulation system, common open space areas, sewage and water facilities, geological, soils and archaeological information, distribution of product types and the sequence of phased development . The Planning Commission approved the Master Plan as submitted and as recommended by staff, with only one modification. The Planning Commission noted that two single family homes -exist on the west side of Roosevelt Lane, south of Pearce Drive. Due to compatibility concerns, the Commission voted to modify the Master Plan for distribution of product types by placing a strip of Low Density Residential along the eastern side of Roosevelt Lane. The Master Plan had proposed Medium-High Density Residential at this location. This modification was reflected in the Planning Commission' s condition of approval no. l .c. for the Master Plan: l .c. The distribution of densities shall be modified to provide a 100 foot strip of Low Density Residential south of Pearce Drive along Roosevelt Lane north. An equal acreage of Medium-High Density Residential shall be extended northward along the western side of the Spine Road. RCA - 3/18/91 -2- (8920d) The applicant has appealed condition of approval l .c. on the following grounds : 1 . Although there are two single family homes on the west side of Roosevelt, the zoning is Medium Density Residential and the majority of the property is developed with apartments . Approximately 110-120 apartment units presently exist in that area . A requirement that the Meadowlark Master Plan designate Low Density Residential in this area would create an incompatible row of single family homes which would be surrounded by apartments and which would not be well received in the market place. Staff Response: Staff concurs with this statement . The property on the west side of Roosevelt is Medium Density Residential and as such, Low Density Residential would not be compatible or desirable on the east side of Roosevelt Lane. The originally proposed Medium-High Density Residential in that area could be setback from Roosevelt and landscaped in a manner that there would be no impacts to the units on the west side of Roosevelt Lane. 2 . Single Family residential along the east side of Roosevelt Lane is not beneficial to the residential uses on the west side of Roosevelt Lane from a parking and traffic standpoint . The original Master Plan did not allow any Meadowlark residential access from Roosevelt . This would permit on-street parking on the east side of Roosevelt Lane by the west side occupants . Placing low density along the east side of Roosevelt, however, would add numerous driveway approaches on the east side of Roosevelt Lane, eliminating on-street parking spaces and adding to traffic on Roosevelt and Pearce. Staff Response: Staff concurs with this statement . The original Master Plan would have completed the east side of Roosevelt Lane with a sidewalk, landscape area and blockwall . No Meadowlark units would access Roosevelt Lane and the entire east side would be available for parking by the west side occupants . 3 . The Planning Commission' s modification would create an irregularly shaped parcel by displacing Medium-High Density Residential from the east side of Roosevelt and extending it in a relatively narrow strip northward along the spine road. It will reduce the efficiency of the parcel and result in an inferior site plan. RCA - 3/18/91 -3- (8920d) Staff Response: Staff concurs with this statement . By retaining the Medium-High Density area in a more uniform configuration it will be possible to design a more efficient product which could provide larger setbacks and edge treatments than would be possible on a more irregularly shaped parcel . Summary: In summary, staff recommends that the City council uphold the appeal and overturn the modification to land use distribution made by the Planning Commission' s condition l.c. Staff maintains that the original Master Plan provided a more compatible distribution of land uses, provided fewer vehicular impacts on Roosevelt Lane and provided for a more beneficial product design. FUNDING SOURCE: No funds required. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council may deny the appeal and retain condition l.c. requiring Low Density Residential along the eastern side of Roosevelt Lane. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Area map 2 . Staff recommended findings and conditions of approval 3 . Planning Commission' s adopted findings and conditions of approval dated February 5, 1991 4 . Appeal letter dated February 14 , 1991 5 . Planning Commission staff report dated February 5, 1991 6 . Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan dated January 29, 1991 MTU:MA:HS: kjl RCA - 3/18/91 -4- (8920d) SISSON J)R PROPOSED 0. C. F. C. D. CF- IFE! 1 1 MEADOWLARK DR z z z z z z L 7 t I VENTURI MEA1 zh < 0 z 0 u I i I '1 0 1 0 z < < 0 0 MARSHALL W > z 0 CALIENTE OR MIDDLECOFF HEIL LL J FERNHILL 5 CF? 2 TAM"" CF - R t3 GELDNG CR Area of Appeal WAVERCER R. ..CADOw CR 0q u FLAGG P.Q'i'm A In Z, X Y < AWE CR d 3: LD 1 WARNER MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN AREA , STAFF RECOMMENDATION FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MEADOWLARK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - MEADOWLARK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN: 1. The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan received and dated January 29, 1991 is consistent with the standards and requirements of the Meadowlark Specific Plan. 2 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. 3 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan shall serve as a guide for the future phased development of the Meadowlark site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - MEADOWLARK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN: 1. The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan received and dated January 29, 1991 shall be the approved Master Plan with the following modifications : a. Residential vehicular access from Roosevelt Lane South shall be limited to a fire emergency gate only. However, limited residential access may be requested pursuant to review and approval of the Phase Two residential project. b. A possible future bus turn out/shelter facility shall be located on Heil Avenue. c. TH�/diC�Yftb�fYtdri/df/eI�rigtKYr�g/�HaiYY/b�/ SddYPt�d/Yd/ Yr6zftde �/Y81d/f dd�/��f t�S/df/Ldzb/0�ri�YL�/K��Ye�r�riYYXY/�d�f�H/r6P/P��`�� Hft�f�/�XdriaJ/KeSr6��f�X�/L'z(rir�/�ddt`�H,l//pCn/�a��I�iY/��¢Je/df P�Ir��IY�it�S/HY�H/Er�rlgiC��/K��Ydr�ri�Y�Y/gKz(YY/b�/��CYr�rideeT/ridf�Hy6X�`�I XYrdrl�/�H�/�b�g��fri/gtdr�/df/�YI�/S�trtr�/Kr6�e�! 2 . Design of Heil Avenue must include provision of right-of-way to allow left-turn lanes at Del Mar and permit on-street parking to remain in place on the north side of Heil, in this area. 3 . The Spine Road through the PRD shall not have any direct access from individual lots, but only via local access streets . No guard gates shall be on public street . 4 . Phasing of project should include traffic study update for each phase, to predict impact and needed adjustments . 5 . Installation of traffic signal at Del Mar/Heil shall be required with first residential phase. 6 . Proportional share of Heil/Graham signalization shall be paid prior to start of final residential phase, as determined by traffic signal warrants . 7. The permanent Spine Road circulation system shall be completed prior to issuance of the first residential occupancy permit . A temporary Spine Road shall be permitted during Phase Two (2) construction subject to the following requirements : a. Construction plans for the permanent Spine Road shall be approved prior to construction of the temporary road. b. The temporary road shall comply with Public Works and Fire Department standards for width and paving type. c. The temporary road shall follow the general alignment of the permanent Spine Road. d. An interim drainage plan shall be approved by Public Works prior to construction of the temporary road. 8 . Phase II archeological studies for each phase of development shall be completed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits for the phase. 9 . An interim fire access to Pearce Drive shall be prepared for review and approval by Community Development, Fire Deparment and Public Works . 10 . An interim paving plan for Pearce Drive, 400 feet east of Roosevelt Lane shall be constructed concurrent with development of Phase Two (2) . 11. A commitment to serve the project shall be received from the Orange county Sanitation District and the City Water Department prior to issuance of building permits for any phase of development. 12 . All standards and requirements of the Meadowlark Specific Plan shall continue to apply. (8936d) • J Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Date: February 8 , 1991 NOTICE OF ACTION Applicant : Pacific Development Group, 1 Corporate Plaza, P.O. Box 3060, Newport Beach, CA 92658 Subject : Meadowlark Master Plan Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on February 5 , 1991 and your request was : WITHDRAWN APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS XX (see attached) DISAPPROVED TABLED CONTINUED UNTIL Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be in writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved. Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of two hundred ($200) dollars and be submitted to the City Clerk' s office within ten (10) days of the date of the Commission ' s action. In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is _ February 15 , 1991 Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any application becomes null and void one (1) year after final approval, unless actual construction has started. (8704d-3) Tentative Parcel Map( a . 90-268/ l l Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 with Special Permit/ Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31/ Meadowlark Master Plan Page Three 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed shopping center es not create an undue traffic problem. 4 . The proposed shopping center is consistent with the eral Plan land use designation of Planned Community . 5 . The proposed shopping center is in general con mance with the standards and specifications of the Meadowla Specific Plan as well as with the Huntington Beach Ordinanc Code . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1 . A special permit to allow 4 . 9% of e parking spaces for the shopping center to be compact s ces is consistent with the requirements of the Huntingto each Ordinance code . 2 . The special permit will adversely affect the circulation and safety of the use, str ure or site, or adjacent land uses . 3 . The special permit ill result in a more effective and efficient circulation pat n and parking layout . 4 . The special rmit will enhance the general appearance of the developme and its surroundings . 5 . The s cial permit will not be detrimental to the general public he , safety, welfare, or convenience, nor injurious to property v ues in the vicinity. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN : 1 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan received and dated January 29 , 1991 is consistent with the standards and requirements of the Meadowlark Specific Plan. 2 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. 3 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan shall serve as a guide for the future phased development of the Meadowlark site. Tentative Parcel M.a�-;. o . 90-268/ Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 with Special Permit/ Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31/ Meadowlark Master Plan Page Twelve b. Should any human bone be encountered during ny construction activities on the site, the archaeologist all contact the coroner pursuant to Section 5097 . 98 and 97 . 99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native Ameri an Remains . Should the coroner determine the human remains t be Native American, the Native American, the Native America Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to State Law B 297 . 14 . Prior to final building permit app oval or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fo owing shall be completed : a . The applicant shall obtain he necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Manage nt District and submit a copy to Community Development D artment . b . All improvements (i uding landscaping) to the property shall be completed in ac rdance with the approved plans and conditions of ap oval specified herein. c . Compliance wi all conditions of approval specified herein shall be acc plished . d . A landsc e license agreement to perform all maintenance necessa to the landscaping installed in public right-of-way areas n the Spine Road . e . A ogram for participation in OCTD "Commuter Network" shall be s mitted by the shopping center . f . Parcel Map No . 90-268 shall be recorded. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL = MEADOWLARK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN: 1 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan received and dated January 29 , 1991 shall be the approved Master Plan with the following modifications : a . Residential vehicular access from Roosevelt Lane South shall be limited to a fire emergency gate only. However, limited residential access may be requested pursuant to review and approval of the Phase Two residential project . b. A possible future bus turn out/shelter facility shall be located on Heil Avenue. Tentative Parcel Mal 10 . 90-268/ Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 with Special Permit/ Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31/ Meadowlark Master Plan Page Thirteen . c . The distribution of densities shall be modified to provide a 100 foot strip of Low Density Resiudential south of Pearce Drive along Roosevelt Lane North. An equal acreage of Medium High Density Residential shall be extended northward along the western side of the Spine Road . 2 . Design of Heil Avenue must include provision of right-of-way to allow left-turn lanes at Del Mar and permit on-street parking to remain in place on the north side of Heil , in this area . 3 . The Spine Road through the PRD shall not have any direct access from individual lots , but only via local access streets . No guard gates shall be on public street . 4 . Phasing of project should include traffic study update for each phase, to predict impact and needed adjustments . 5 . Installation of traffic signal at Del Mar/Heil shall be required with first residential phase . 6 . Proportional share of Heil/Graham signalization shall be paid prior to start of final residential phase, as determined by traffic signal warrants . 7 . The permanent Spine Road circulation system shall be completed prior to issuance of the first residential occupancy permit . A temporary Spine Road shall be permitted during Phase Two (2) construction subject to the following requirements : a . Construction plans for the permanent Spine Road shall be approved prior to construction of the temporary road . b. The temporary road shall comply with Public Works and Fire Department standards for width and paving type . c. The temporary road shall follow the general alignment of the permanent Spine Road. d . An interim drainage plan shall be approved by Public Works prior to construction of the temporary road . 8 . Phase II archeological studies for each phase of development shall be completed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits for the phase. 9 . An interim fire access to Pearce Drive shall be prepared for review and approval by Community Development, Fire Deparment and Public Works . Tentative Parcel MaI'_ 10 . 90-268/ Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 with Special Permit/ Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31/ Meadowlark Master Plan Page Fourteen 10 . An interim paving plan for Pearce Drive, 400 feet east of Roosevelt Lane shall be constructed concurrent with development of Phase Two (2) . 11 . A commitment to serve the project shall be received from the Orange county Sanitation District and the City Water Department prior to issuance of building permits for any phase of development . 12 . All standards and requirements of the Meadowlark Specific Plan shall continue to apply. I hereby certify that Tentative Parcel map No . 90-268 , Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 with Special Permit , Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31 and Meadowlark Master Plan were approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on February 5 , 1991 upon the foregoing findings and conditions . These approvals represent Planning Commission approval only; detailed plans must be submitted to the City for review and the aforementioned conditions completed prior to issuance of construction documents . Sincerely, Mike Adams , Secretary Planning Commission by: Ha Simmons Senior Planner (8684d-1, 14) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF PROPERTY BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF PROPERTY BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 33391 provides authority for the Agency to purchase any real or personal property or any interest in property and improvements on it; and WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 33220 provides the authority for the City to convey to the Agency any of its property; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of a certain property owned by the i City proposed to be conveyed to the Agency in the Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Property between the City of Huntington Beach and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach dated November _-, 1990 is necessary to facilitate the redevelopment within the Main Pier Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Agency pursuant to that Agreement agrees to pay to the City and 'the City agrees to accept as payment the appraisal value of the property. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: j.. ( ECt:IVf t, ':IT Y 1 ^n 1 1� February 14, 1991 Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Sirs: On behalf of Mr. Richard Nerio, we would like to respectively submit this letter of appeal of the Planning Commission's action on the Meadowlark Conceptual Masterplan. Specifically,we would like to appeal Condition of Approval Number lc which reads: lc. The distribution of den,ities shall be modified to provide a strip of Low Density Residential south of Pearce Drive along Roosevelt Lane North. A proportional acreage of Medium High Density Residential shall be extended northward along the western side of the spine road. Our reasons for objecting to this condition are numerous. We feel that our original Conceptual Masterplan proposal reflects a superior land use plan. First, by proposing the Medium High Density directly adjacent to Roosevelt Lane North,we are responding to the existing development and zoning to the west of the Meadowlark Property. Although the planning commission was lead to think that the adjacent development consists of single family homes, the fact is that there arc only two single family homes along that segment of Roosevelt. The majority of the existing residential along Roosevelt is already apartments and more are currently under construction. There are actually about 110-120 apartment units between Bolsa Chica Street and Roosevelt surrounding these two homes. All of that area is zoned R-2 which allows for Multi-Family Residential Development. Condition lc, as approved by the Planning Commission, would require Single Family Homes to be developed on the east side of Roosevelt, across the street from the existing apartments and backing onto the proposed Medium High Density development. The result would be a row of homes which are also surrounded by apartments. We don't feel that these new homes would be well received in the market place. These homes do not represent a transition of compatible land uses nor do they create a "highest and best use" of the property. We would like to have Condition lc eliminated in order to allow the Medium High Density to remain along Roosevelt North. Secondly, we feel that the Single Family strip along Roosevelt North is not beneficial to the existing residential areas from a parking and traffic standpoint. The Conceptual Master Plan as originally proposed did not allow any access to Roosevelt from the Medium High Density parcel. This allowed for additional parking along the east side of Roosevelt which would benefit the adjacent existing residential neighborhood. The addition of Single Family Development and driveway approaches along Roosevelt would reduce this parking by about 50%. These 10-12 proposed homes would also most likely increase traffic onto Pearce Street causing 100-120 additional average daily vehicular trips along Pearce. Since the original Conceptual Masterplan proposes no access onto Roosevelt Lane from the Medium High Density parcel, this potential traffic impact would be eliminated. City of Huntington Beach January 14, 1991 Page Z Finally Condition 1c would create a Medium High Density parcel which is much more irregular in shape than originally proposed. This will reduce the efficiency of that parcel and would most likely result in an inferior site plan. Also by extending the Medium High Density Parcel northward along the project spine road, we are adversely affecting the aesthetics of that street which is an important element of the overall Meadowlark Conceptual Masterplan. It increases the building massing along the spine road and diminishes the visual aspect of the proposed Single Family parcel. The Meadowlark Conceptual Masterplan is intended as an overall mixed- use community balancing commercial and three type of residential products into individual neighborhoods. To the extent that the visual dominance of the Medium High Density is perceived over the Single Family neighborhood has an adverse effect on the overall Meadowlark Community. For the above stated reasons, we would like the City Council to reconsider Condition lc and eliminate it, approving the Conceptual Masterplan without compromising its original integrity. We would also request that we be allowed to clarify and/or elaborate our reasons for appeal at the appropriate City Council Hearing. Sincerely, Terry Galloway Morse Consulting Group Dick Nero i Property Owner huntington beach department of community development sra f f REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: FEBRUARY 5 , 1991 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 90-2681CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-45 WITH SPECIAL PERMIT/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 91-31/MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN APPLICANT: Pacific Development Group DATE ACCEPTED: 1 Corporate Plaza December 8 , 1990 P.O. Box 3060 Newport Beach, CA 92658 MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE: February 8 , 1991 I PROPERTY Richard Nerio ' OWNER: 9340 Bolsa Avenue I Westminster, CA 92683 ZONE: Meadowlark 'S*ffdlif is Plan RE UEST: 122 , 665 square foot "- - shopping center with GENERAL PLAN: Planned compact parking and Community variance to front landscape setback. Parcel map for EXISTING USE: Vacant commercial and residential . (Former Airport) Conceptual Masterplan for entire Meadowlark site . ACREAGE: 65 + Gross Acres LOCATION: 5141 Warner Avenue 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION: Approve Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 , Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31 and Tentative Parcel Map No . 90-268 with findings and suggested conditions of approval . Also approve Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan with findings and suggested conditions of approval . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 is a request for a 122, 665 square foot shopping center with a special permit for 4 . 9 percent compact parking . Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31 is a request to encroach into the 50 foot landscape setback on Warner Avenue. Tentative Parcel Map No . 90-268 is a request to parcelize the Meadowlark Airport site into three (3) parcels; parcels one and two for the shopping center and parcel three for the remaining residential area . The Meadowlark Masterplan is a requirement of the Meadowlark Specific Plan and is intended to provide a guide to the future development and phasing Alift entire Meadowlark site. 1'�fi jP A-FM-23C r 3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Planned Community ZONE: Meadowlark Specific Plan LAND USE: Vacant North of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential ZONE: R1 (Single Family) LAND USE: Single Family Homes East of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium and Low Density Residential ZONE: R4 (High Density) and R1 (Single Family) LAND USE: Townhomes and Single Family Homes South of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium-High Density and Low Density ZONE: R3 (Medium-High Density and R1 (Low Density) LAND USE: Office and Single Family Homes West of Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density, Medium Density and Commercial ZONE: MH (Mobilehome) , R1 (Single Family) , R2 (Medium Density) and OP (Office Professional) LAND USE: Single Family, Multi-Family and Commercial 4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The proposed project is covered by Environmental Impact Report No . 87-2 which was certified by the City Council on February 1, 1988 . No further action is required by the Planning Commission regarding the environmental impact report . 5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS: Not applicable. 6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable. 7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: The project is located within the Meadowlark Specific Plan area and the standards of the Specific Plan will apply. 8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable . 9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS : Project Description: Entitlement on the Meadowlark Airport site is governed by the Meadowlark Specific Plan. The Specific Plan permits 15 acres of commercial fronting Warner Avenue and 50 acres of Low, Medium and Medium-High Density Residential ( 600 units) on the remainder of the site . The Specific Plan dictates general parameters for product types , building and street location and setback and pedestrian trail requirements . The Specific Plan further dictates the process by which entitlements are granted . The Specific Plan requires that each portion of the project be approved by conditional use permit and that a Masterplan for the entire site be approved concurrent with the first conditional use permit . The Masterplan is intended to provide a guide to the future development and phasing of the entire Meadowlark site. In response to the Specific Plan requirements, the applicant has submitted four (4) entitlements to be processed concurrently. Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45 and Conditional Exception No . 91-31 relate to the 15 acre shopping center located on Warner Avenue. Tentative Parcel Map No . 90-268 is to parcelize the entire airport site into two (2) parcels for the commercial site and one (1) parcel for the future residential portion. The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan is intended to identify the general distribution of residential densities , street alignments trail system and daycare center location. Each item will be addressed separately in this staff report . MEADOWLARK PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER: The proposed shopping center is 15 gross acres in size (13 . 5 acres net) and contains 122 , 665 square feet of retail area . The major tenants are a grocery store and a drug store. Other uses include 2, 000 square feet of office and 10 , 000 square feet of restaurant . The buildings are arranged with the anchors and some small tenants at the rear of the site . Other office, shop and restaurant pads are located along Roosevelt Lane to the west and out front on Warner Avenue to the south. A 6, 500 square foot shop pad is also located on Warner Avenue adjacent to the Fernhill tract to the east . Primary access to the shopping center is taken via a Spine Road which intersects Warner Avenue at Greentree Lane. This Spine Road will be signalized and will serve a dual purpose as a primary access to the residential area behind the shopping center as well . The road will allow two (2) lanes in and three (3) lanes out, including a left turn pocket with 190 feet of stacking area . A 240 foot Staff Report - 2/5/91 -3- (8554d) reo• _ a 'O+ r FUTURE RESIDENTIAL s s — MEADOWLARK PLAZA ° f(s.at+<1 t<t ASK 11.Clwt(R -_.----_.._. non v.0 e r tANoxu[ N s u•.>^[ n — I• --�--•—�-- - .. _ I� —— •e. .[Citl�K OVERLAND DRIVE •`'; II w(tt rca sro sw� — i 1 I J _- 0' VICINITY MAP I^ MAR 08 SF s I i<I DRUG STORE 2 - f 27.482 SF W -N M rASRL7 I SHOPS 3 SHOPS 2 O N R L O c S 6850 SF 6 5400 SF ro' w• - n J I I I i!I b•I , i ri I I,I � ., ..<-- ., I I / � "i. i i VACANT ~-I wl tarot roc rott w+co.R.( wr co.Rn c•Rr careu u.+calla / / it i RESIDENTIAL Summary W+ I 2 ' �/ �� r✓ /' i.=lI 586,285sf land area —•--•• O I SHOPS 't' 2.' i2• 22• 22' 27' !2' 2,' 22' 12'//'` 77• 77 •'t o' I 122.665sf gross bldg area ' R '•r00.e. _ /�/ ,/� .-.-s 3,8/1 land-to-bldg ratio q aA St �• �/ / Irani 654 stalls req'd OFFICE I,yt // ';� — 659 stalls prov'd 2000 SF / / / / /' I! I J2e-s•.I.• .fell. or ✓ Gv y / /) P-k-g r.ga;r...M, th.1!°b• o.NnHNLNs { Y — i I;_, colcalo,ea of lolloa c I v t I I I P• 108.765s1-G—ral -tai 1 O 5/10�=5.A Z I a I ^ I 11111 I I ' I I II r Dais• t I I 10.000 sl-R.,1. (0..2002ss Is)c0 1/100 501 00 1900st-Wor.Noase O 1/1000=2 s2 172' t1 I i III ^ I Jo 11 n sr v• v• 2s• L- 2,.^ I •o' SHOPS/PAD „out Hops/PA s. 2so sr.,., s SHOPC/PAD r I I j p '. NOTES: I rtA B A ^ un sr 1°0°sr 11 - 1 OAN(R 10 IUPOSE CIJPLOYEE PARKE(NG J T 1 I I . tiwt II RCGULAI IDNS IN MAJOR TENANT L(ASES a �I (•`..o+srt+t tea, 2, OvsiER 10 RECORD RCCIPROCAL FARKI)C ur[[.uu �I, �._.c[Nru i.o.sia u''°54'I"'a (�wos.R.(w+sia X) I 1 1 -- _ --- — •I AGREEM Ni 9 FWE(N PARC(L /1 A PARCEL /2 ................. � .us w.wout 17 f� —"—'•� \ o[cnualow uv[ \.�— _ � w _ _ _ �.�t_ WARNER AVENUE � �s�wu:[o iNr[rsa+iow j •I cx x W Q A SHOPPING CENTER Poo JECT FOR: BOLSA REALTY J �J 9340 BOLSA AVENUE ^� WESTMIN TER CA 8939 683 M521 EADOWLARK PLAZA MCG ; W A R N E R A V E N U E H U N T I N G T O N B C A C H C A L I F 0 R N I A architects FD0'CCT ADvlzon: s .r. PAC If IC UL VL LUPMENT GROUP _ .< s>, 1 CORPORATE PLAZA ,• •.. NEwPORf REACH, CA 92650 I.�r1 ,I (714) 760 - 8591 landscape median in the Spine Road extends from Warner Avenue to a point well past the first parking lot entrance. The length of the landscape median is intended to eliminate cross traffic conflicts with the first parking lot entrance and create an aesthetically pleasing entrance to the shopping center . Additional shopping center access is provided via an unsignalized right-in, right-out only driveway from Warner Avenue opposite Leslie Lane. Access is also available from Roosevelt Lane south further to the west . Roosevelt Lane is cul-de-saced at the rear of the shopping center . Eventually, it is anticipated that this section of Roosevelt Lane will be a major commercial access which will not only provide access to the Meadowlark Plaza Shopping Center, but also future commercial which will extend west to Bolsa Chica Street . It is recommended that this section of Roosevelt Lane be renamed so as not to cause confusion with a residential section of Roosevelt Lane which connects to Pearce Drive behind the shopping center . On--site shopping center circulation is designed to provide a loop system around the center . One portion of the loop connects the Spine Road on the east to Roosevelt on the west, traversing the front of the market and drugstore. Another portion of the loop connects the same streets at the back of the shopping center . This portion will be utilized by delivery trucks and employees as well as customers seeking access to the market ' s recycling center on the northwest corner of the site. A third portion of the loop traverses the front of the center and provides right-turn-only access to the Spine Road. A total of 659 parking spaces are provided on-site. Of those, 530 are located in front of the market and drug store and 129 are located behind the market and drugstore. A special permit to allow 4 . 9% compact parking is included in the entitlement request . All of the 32 compact parking spaces are located behind the center and must be designated in a parking master plan as employee parking only. Staff recommends that the small amount of compact parking be approved . Of concern to staff, though, are the remaining 97 parking spaces (total 129) which are located behind the market . Since there is no rear customer entrance to the market or shops, staff can support only as many spaces in the rear as will be required for employee parking . In the absence of an employee parking study, staff recommends that 29 parking spaces be relocated to the front of the center or that rear customer access be provided. The 29 spaces to be relocated would be 15 spaces behind Shops 2 and 14 spaces behind Shops 3 . A major issue regarding the shopping center concerns Shops/Pad D on the southeast corner . This pad location has been a focus of concern to the Fernhill Tract residents immediately to the east . In order to maximize compatablity, the pad has been reduced in size from 9 , 000 to 6, 500 square feet and relocated as close to Warner Avenue Staff Report - 2/5/91 -5- (8554d) as possible. A twenty-five (25) foot landscape setback to the Fernhill property line is maintained as required by the Meadowlark Specific Plan. No service doors exist on the east side of the building . The pad is one story in height . Staff recommends that food related uses not be permitted in the pad. Conditional Exception (variance) No . 91-31 has been processed for this shopping center . The variance is required because the Specific Plan requires a landscape setback of 50 feet for the entire Warner Avenue frontage. The shopping center site plan, however, proposed buildings with setbacks of 25 and 30 feet . The landscape setback itself varies from 20 feet to 30 feet, with the 20 foot dimension occuring only behind an OCTD required bus turn out . Staff supports the variance request for several reasons . First of all, the usable portion of the shopping center is substantially, restricted by the amount of land taken by the Spine Road and the 20 foot landscape setback on the eastern property line. Secondly, a large open area of landscaping is provided on each side of the Spine Road intersection with Warner Avenue. This area will provide an attractive entrance to the project and will foster an "open" feel for the site. Also, staff feels it is desirable to have as many pads up front on the site as possible in order to minimize views of the parking lot and create a shopping area identity. Staff maintains that the proposed 20-30 foot landscape setback is sufficient to provide an attractive street frontage for the project . A standard landscape setback elsewhere in the City would be ten feet . The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed shopping center with the development standards of the Meadowlark Specific Plan and Division 9 : Section Issue Required Proposed Meadowlark Specific Plan N.4 . b Landscape Setback on Fernhill ( inter . ) 20 ft . 20 ft . N. 4 .b Bldg . Height Next to Fernhill 30 ft . Max. 26 ft . N. 4 .c Collector Street Landscape Setback 20 ft . 20 ft . N.4 .d Landscape Setback on Warner (front) 50 ft . 20-30 ft . * Division 9 9220 . 5 Bldg. Height 50 ft . Max. 35 ft . -6 in. 9220 . 7 Setbacks : Exterior Side 10 ft . 20 ft . Rear 10 ft . 56 ft . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -6- (8554d) Section Issue Required Proposed 9601 . 2 Main Entrance 100 ft . 200 ft . 9601 . 5 Parking Stall Dim. Standard 9 ft . x 19 ft . 9 ft . -6 in.x19 ft . Compact 8 ft . x 17 ft . 8 ft . x 17 ft . Drive Aisle Width 600 Parking (2-way) 20 ft . 22 ft . 900 Parking (2-way) 26 ft . 27 ft . 9602 . 1 Handicapped Parking 8 8 9602 . 2 Parking Spaces Required Retail ( 1/200) 544 549 Office ( 1/250) 8 8 Restaurants (1/100) 100 100 Warehouse (1/1000) 2 2 TOTAL 654 659 9604 .4 Rear Access Drives 25 ft . 28 ft . to 34 ft . 9604 . 5 Compact Spaces (20% Maximum) 131 spaces max. 32 spaces** 9607 . 1 Landscaping 8% 13% 9607 . 2 Parking Landscaping One 24 in. box tree/ 10 spaces (65 trees) 104 trees *Conditional Exception (Variance) Required **Special Permit Required Architecture : The architectural style of the project may be described as Spanish/Mediterranean. The buildings are characterized by tile roofs , arched canopies and integral columns . At staff ' s request the applicant has added architectural features including tile and columns to the rear elevations of the Market and Drugstore in order to improve visual impacts upon the future residential area behind the center . Staff has also worked with the applicant to design the Roosevelt elevation of Shops 4 to give the appearance of a building front rather than rear on Roosevelt . Lastly, staff supports the plaza design incorporated into the area around Shops/Pads A and B at the corner of Roosevelt and Warner Avenue. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -7- (8554d) r� Sewer and Water Service : The Meadowlark Specific Plan requires that sewer and water service committments be received from the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) and the City Water Department prior to issuance of building permits . Letters have been received from both agnecies and are attached to this report . The Sanitation District letter agrees to provide sewer service to the 15 . 0 acre shopping center and notes that future residential phases will be contingent upon completion of the Slater Pump Station improvements . The Water Department has also submitted a letter which, while not refusing service to the project, is pessimistic with regards to water availability. The letter notes that on a City-wide basis peak hour demands cannot be met unless the 1988 Water System Masterplan is implemented and that new supply sources and storage facilities are needed. In response to those concerns , the Public Works Department has added conditions to the conditional use permit that the developer submit mitigation measures for approval by the City which address reducing peak hour demands and increasing water supply sources and storage facilities . Tentative Parcel Map No . 90-268 : This map has been submitted in order to subdivide the entire Meadowlark site from seven (7) parcels into three (3) parcels . Parcels One (1) and Two (2) comprise the shopping center area on Warner Avenue. Parcel one (1) is a 1 . 7 acre triangular shaped parcel on the east side of the Spine Road and is proposed to be occupied by Shops/Pad D. Parcel two (2) is 12 . 1 acres west of the Spine Road and will be developed with the remainder of the shopping center . Forming the common border of Parcels One (1) and Two (2) is the center line of the Spine Road. A curb-to-curb width ranging from 68 feet at the Warner entrance to 40 feet at the northern end is indicated and is consistent with the shopping center site plan. The map further depicts 60 feet to the center line of Warner Avenue and 30 feet to the centerline of Roosevelt Lane south. Staff is recommending that the Spine Road and Roosevelt Lane south be dedicated as public roads and that a Landscape License Agreement be prepared for maintenance of landscaping within the public right-of-way on the Spine Road. Public Works also notes that the City reserves the right to eliminate outbound left-turns from Roosevelt Lane in the future . Parcel Three (3) comprises the remaining 48 . 7 acres of the Meadowlark property. This area will be subdivided on a tract by tract basis as phased development of the residential products occurs . This portion of the map indicates 26 feet to the center lines of Roosevelt Lane and Pearce Drive, and 40 feet to the Center line of Heil Avenue. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -8- (8554d) 1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 90-268 PORTION OF S.W. 1/4 SEC., SECTION 21, T.5S., R.11,W. !{ CITY OF HUN INGTON BEACH.COUNTY OF ORANGE f I LAYS Jf. 1` -tt I.._.1."- a :-t A - E%6TEq CNLAPI . Ex5T1+0 A1081E HOWPAg1(f VIC/RY MAC TRACT NO eA 12 - TYPICAL$ECT1pN NATWAL PARK SNOU,FAAIY DEWIER TRACT NO YWS 1 \ II 'TYPICAL SECTION =on om \ I - IEi/VENUE a 1 '� - SEIDLE RAAIY DEUCED l SECTK7M A.A i .. 11� C Q ILL*FI/TFY 7�Y � I A tr 1. 1 I I TRACT NO 10449 O �U - 1 u ACRES I �I - - - _. _ .1 / ��„«e •—r�—� .gym..... , =� TYPK'AL 6„ E, 6ECT,DN _ �. - I ...'1�.(.. SHOIEKMl1 DEUCED TRACT NO-$7sl .II I I OVERLA AID- DOM - ONIlJVAPP c"n PROPOSED ZO NHO .A on d wmnMoo.w.o. tWiLl ACRES RoosEVELT LAlE sDurN, � ` i ; /DOE MASSESSORS PAAM KAMIERS �....,�... LAND USE SLOSAARY EOSTWO LAND USE �- �' l I I P�ROP�OBID LA/O{AE IyrIC1�11 1 A .fY A\ i ` 1 r �.r voi All" ft OO E COuNSpUL"NC C�RAOUoP MEADOWLARK PROPERTY MASTER PLAN: The Meadowlark Specific Plan requires that at the time of first entitlement, a Conceptual Master Plan be prepared for the entire site. The Master Plan must indicate a variety of items of information under the catagories of Conceptual Master Plan and Statement Required. The following is a discussion of the information provided under each item: Conceptual Master Plan: A. Perimeter Buffer Alignment - The Specific Plan requires that new development adjacent to any single family zoning be either a single family product itself , or be buffered with a 100 foot setback. The Master Plan proposes single family construction adjacent to existing single family development north of Pearce Drive on the west side of the site . Existing single family development on Old Pirate Lane, Stonehaven Circle and Meadow Circle adjacent to the east side of the site is provided in the Master Plan with a 100 foot buffer zone. The Master Plan indicates single family construction at 6 . 5 units per acre as an alternative use within the buffer zone . B. Location of Pedestrian Walkways - The plan indicates pedestrian walkways along the Spine Road leading into the shopping center area . A walkway is also indicated connecting Pearce Drive on the west to Gibbs Park on the east . C. Circulation Pattern of Vehicular Traffic - The plan shows a Spine Road connecting from Heil Avenue to Warner Avenue. This road serves as a collector street for all of the future residential tracts , as well as the major entrance to the shopping center and is consistent with the Specific Plan. Arrows indicate the approximate locations of private local street connections to the collector . The plan also shows a circuitous connection of Pearce Drive to the Spine Road. This connection is necessary to provide fire access to existing development west of Meadowlark. The Pearce Drive connection will traverse single family areas only and may not allow daily trips on Pearce Drive to exceed 2, 500 . This is consistent with the Specific Plan. Lastly, the plan indicates that Roosevelt Lane is cul-de-saced behind the shopping center and does not allow a through connection to Warner Avenue. This is also consistent with the Specific Plan. Staff is conditioning that the Spine Road be dedicated as a public street and that no gating of the Spine Road be permitted. If the ultimate design of the road does not meet Public works standards a Landscape License Agreement may be required. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -10- (8554d) SECTION A-A COMMERCIAL ENTRY/PROJECT SPINE ROAD . / _ i CHURCH _ rSINGLE FAMILY —I —s —— ( ) ----—� - .i .-•.•--I! t-- MOBILE HOME PARK t_>= ;DETACHED I (MH) ,. SECTION B-B PROJECT SPINE ROAD/PEARCE DRIVE I SECTION C-C ROOSEVELT LANE(SOUTH) Siti;� :�`-_ ;' "!f NATURAL PARK — — _ --- (CF-R) PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO « -��. I -• _ _ __ / .. NEIGHBORHOOD PARK h`'i.:-.......•-��--,r..tn.l .moo„ -- -. - - ,_ - .. .. SECTION D-D � F—/ING ROOSEVELT LANE(NORTH) 'LE FAMILYETAC�D" I o 7.0-:D.U.,AC.'MAX. 3 - SINGLE FAMILY h SINGLE FAMILY" W DETACHED = /' �' i:_ e �\ DETACHED g / / I \ - _ r = PEARCE DR _-r __ -- — / _ ' MEDIUM DENSITY' I "• _- - � ' 20.0 AC. 00'BUFFER240 UNITS I 6S DU/A6-12 D.U./AC.MAX.RESIDENTIAL(R2) .- n MEDIUM HIGH DENSITN12.0 AC. T_ I D 240 UNTS / f----- 7 - - 20 D.U./AC:MAX: F>/ SINGLE FAMILY - I — 'DETACHED (R1) .- F PROPOSED FUTURE DAY CARE FACILITY c c FERNHILL RESIDENTIAL (R4) COMMERCIAL ' I - 15.0 AC. - lf 'VACANT - J - •=-- - A A COMM RCIAL -i- - NO LEF7 TURN Ex1T-- = SECTION E•E RESIDENTIAL ENTRY ---WARNER-AWY& ---_---- - T- -' -=- - -- W _ SECTION F•F PRIVATE DRIVE CONCEPTUAL Meado ..` party MASTERPLAN ,�* c• NOT TO SCALE CONCE S T E R P L A N �MORSE CONSULTING GROUP _ __PL IVIVING • ENGINEERING • 51IRVEYING 1, D. Use of Common Open Space Areas - The plan indicates that common open space areas will include building setback areas, edge treatments behind the shopping center and active and passive recreation areas associated with individual residential developments . Those areas will be established on a tract by tract basis as conditional use permits are processed for each residential phase . No public park is required by either the General Plan or the Specific Plan, although access to existing Gibbs Park to the east is mandated. Access is provided via a sidewalk and trail system. E . Layout Showing Proposed Sewage and Water Facilities - The plan depicts proposed sewer and water lines located in the spine road and serving the proposed shopping center . The facilities are consistent with City plans and specifications and will be subject to more detailed review and approval at the time of individual entitlements . Statement Required: A. Distance to Known Geological Hazard - The plan identifies general soils conditions and indicates a distance of 2, 000 feet from the Bolsa-Fairview Fault and 5, 000 feet from the Aquist Priolo Special Studies Zone . B. Existence of Hazardous Materials On-Site - The plan indicates the presence of gasoline contaminated soils on-site and attaches a letter from the Orange County Environmental Health Division identifying procedures for site clean-up . C. Results of Phase I and II Archeological Assessment - The plan indicates that the Phase I investigation revealed five areas containing ground surface shell materials . Phase II investigation involves a subsurface investigation. The subsurface investigation of ORA 368 on the shopping center site revealed a limited number of artifactual materials . Radio carbon dating of the shells indicates use of the site further back in time than previously thought . SRS is still preparing their final report on the archeological study and staff is therefore recommending that no grading permits for the site be issued until the final report has been submitted. Staff is further recommending that after the report is submitted and grading permitted, that a certified archaeologist be present during all grading operations and be furnished a copy of the archeological report . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -12- (8554d) D. Gross Area of Product Types - The plan depicts the four product types required by the Specific Plan: Commercial, Low Density, Medium Density and Medium-High Density. They are generally proposed to be distributed with Commercial to the south on Warner Avenue, Low Density to the north and northwest, Medium Density to the southeast and Medium-High Density to the southwest . Acreage of each are as follows : Commercial 15 Acres Low Density (Single Family) 18 Acres Medium Density 20 Acres Medium-High Density 12 Acres 65 TOTAL These acreages are consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan. It should be noted that the Low Density portion is proposed to be developed as a small lot PRD with a maximum density of seven (7) units per acre. Six thousand (6, 000) square feet should not be anticipated. E. Number and Type of Units and Bedrooms - The plan proposes the following number of units and bedrooms : Units Bedrooms Single Family 120 360 Medium Density 240 600 Medium-High Density 240 480 600 1,440 This is consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan. F. Number of Units and Bedrooms per Gross Acre - The plan proposes the following numbers : UNITS/ACRE BEDROOM/ACRE Single Family 6 . 7 20 Medium Density 12 . 0 30 Medium High Density 20 . 0 40 Overall 12 . 0 28 This is consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan. G. Schedule and Sequence of Development - The plan proposes development in four (4) phases . Phase One (1) is the shopping center, Phase Two (2) is the Medium-High Density Residential , Phase Three (3) is the Medium Density Residential and Phase Four (4) is the Single Family Residential . Staff is recommending that Phase Two (2) include interim paving of a 400 foot extension of Pearce Drive in order to give the street a more finished appearance while awaiting Phase Four (4) construction. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -13- (8554d) Other Issues : The Specific Plan contains a number of requirements which apply to various phases of development on the Meadowlark property. The majority of those items applicable to the shopping center and Master Plan have been discussed. Other issues such as signalization of Pearce Drive at Bolsa Chica Street and Homeowner ' s Associations will be addressed at the time of entitlement for the residential phases . Transit facilities and air quality mitigation measures are appropriate to address at the point, however . Transit Facilities : The Specific Plan requires that bus turn outs and bus shelters be provided at areas designated by OCTD and the City Public Works Department . At OCTD' s request a bus turn out has been incorporated into the shopping center on Warner Avenue midway between Greentree and Leslie Lanes . Additionally, the Public Works Department has requested that a future bus turn out be designated on the Master Plan on Heil Avenue. The Specific Plan also requires that the developer participate in OCTD' s "Commuter Network" which is a computor-run rideshare program. Staff is conditioning that the developer submit a program for participation in "Commuter Network" prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy. Air uali The Specific Plan and EIR require that an on-site neighborhood child care facility be considered in order to limit vehicle trips from the 600 units offsite in search of child care services . The applicant has proposed a future child care facility immediatly behind the shopping center, east of the Spine Road. Concerns have been stated by some Fernhill tract residents regarding the proposed child care facility location, but staff is satisified that compatibility concerns can be mitigated through setbacks and site design. These will be determined at time of Phase Three (3) CUP/Tract Map approval . 10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No . 90-45, Conditional Exception (variance) No . 91-31 and Tentative Parcel map No . 90-268 with findings and suggested conditions of approval . Also approve Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan with findings and suggested conditions . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -14- (8554d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO, 90-268 : 1 . The size, depth, frontage, street width and other design features of the proposed subdivision for commercial and residential development are in compliance with the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as well as in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the supplemental City Subdivision Ordinance . 2 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of land use at the time that the General Plan Designation of Planned Community and zoning of Meadowlark Specific Plan were adopted. 3 . The General Plan has set forth provisions for commercial and residential development as well as setting forth objectives for the implementation of this type of use. 4 . The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed commercial and residential uses . 5 . Tentative Parcel Map No . 90-268 is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 91-31 : 1 . There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the land, buildings and premises that do not apply generally to other property or uses in the district because the site is governed by the Meadowlark Specific Plan which is more restrictive than standard zoning . Also, the site area is reduced by the need for a public street through the project as well as other requirements for interior side yard landscaping and building location. 2 . The granting of a conditional exception for reduction in front landscape setback is necessary in order to preserve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights because of other unusually restrictive development standards . 3 . The granting of Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 91-31 for reduction in front landscape setback will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or injurious to the conforming improvements in the neighborhood. 4 . The granting of this conditional exception from Section N.4 .d of the Meadowlark Specific Plan will not defeat the general purposes or intent of the Specific Plan which is to provide an attractively landscaped shopping center frontage. 5 . The granting of the conditional exception for reduction in front landscape setback will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -15- (8554d) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 90-45 : 1 . The location, site layout, and design of the proposed shopping center properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways , and other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner . 2 . The combination and relationship of one proposed use to another on the site are properly integrated . 3 . The access to and parking for the proposed shopping center does not create an undue traffic problem. 4 . The proposed shopping center is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Planned Community. 5 . The proposed shopping center is in general conformance with the standards and specifications of the Meadowlark Specific Plan as well as with the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - SPECIAL PERMIT: 1 . A special permit to allow 4 . 9% of the parking spaces for the shopping center to be compact spaces is consistent with the requirements of the Huntington Beach Ordinance code . 2 . The special permit will not adversely affect the circulation and safety of the use, structure or site, or adjacent land uses . 3 . The special permit will result in a more effective and efficient circulation pattern and parking layout . 4 . The special permit will enhance the general appearance of the development and its surroundings . 5 . The special permit will not be detrimental to the general public health, safety, welfare, or convenience, nor injurious to property values in the vicinity. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN: 1 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan received and dated January 29 , 1991 is consistent with the standards and requirements of the Meadowlark Specific Plan. 2 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. 3 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan shall serve as a guide for the future phased development of the Meadowlark site. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -16- (8554d) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 90-268 : 1 . The Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community Development on January 29 , 1991 shall be the approved layout (with the amendments as noted thereon) . 2 . A parcel map shall be filed with and approved by the Department of Public Works and recorded with the Orange County Recorder . 3 . Roosevelt Lane South shall be dedicated to City standards . 4 . Water supply shall be through the City of Huntington Beach' s water system at the time said parcel(s) is/are developed (if such i systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s) . 5 . Sewage disposal shall be through the City of Huntington Beach' s sewage system at the time said parcel (s) is/are developed (if such systems exist within 200 feet of said parcel(s) . 6 . All utilities shall be installed underground at the time said parcel (s) is/are developed. 7 . Compliance with all applicable City Ordinances . 8 . A copy of the recorded parcel map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development . 9 . The applicant shall file, through the Huntington Beach City Clerk' s office, and have recorded with the Orange County Recorder ' s Office, a Certificate of Compliance in conjunction with the approved plat map. A copy of the recorded Certificate of Compliance and plat map shall be filed with the Department of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits on the subject property. 10 . All vehicular access rights along Warner Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 12 . Roosevelt Lane South shall be renamed subject to review and approval by the Fire Department . 12 . Roosevelt Lane and the Spine Road shall be offered for dedication to the City as public streets . 13 . A landscape license agreement to perform all maintenance necessary to the landscaping installed in public right-of-way areas on the Spine Road shall be imposed. 14 . Additional maps shall be required for residential development on Parcel Three (3) . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -17- (8554d) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 90-45 : 1 . The site plan, floor plans , and elevations received and dated January 29 , 1991 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications : a . The twenty-nine (29) parking spaces located behind Shops 2 and 3 shall be relocated to the front of the shopping center or shall be provided with rear customer access to the center . b. Roosevelt Lane shall be renamed subject to review and approval by the Fire Department . 2 . Shops/Pad D shall be limited to office or retail use and shall not permit food or restaurant uses . 3 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Submit three copies of the site plan to the Planning Division for addressing purposes . If street names are necessary, submit proposal to Fire Department for review and approval . b. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director . c. Floor plans shall depict natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location of clothes dryers; natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities , water heaters, and central heating units; and low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets . d. If foil-type insulation is to be used, a fire retardant type shall be installed as approved by the Building Department and indicated on the floor plans . e . Elevations shall depict colors and building materials proposed . g . All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors . If screening is not designed specifically into the building , a rooftop mechanical equipment plan must be submitted showing screening and must be approved. h. If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties and shall be noted on the site plan and elevations . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -18- (8554d) j . Any contaminated soils shall be properly identified and a removal plan submitted pursuant to the standards and procedures of the Orange County Health Care Agency, the California Health and Safety Code, the California Code of Regulations, Title 23 and the Huntington Beach Fire Department . k. The Phase II archeological assessment shall be completed and submitted to the City for review. 1 . An engineering geologist shall be engaged to submit a report indicating the ground surface acceleration from earth movement for the subject property. All structures within this development shall be constructed in compliance with the g-factors as indicated by the geologist ' s report . Calculations for footings and structural members to withstand anticipated g-factors shall be submitted to the City for review prior to the issuance of building permits . m. The site plan shall include (or reference page) all conditions of approval imposed on the project printed verbatim. 4 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant/owner shall complete the following : a . Submit copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No . 1 for review and approval and inclusion in the entitlement file. b. A Landscape Construction Set must be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Public Works and must be approved. The Landscape Construction Set shall include a landscape plan prepared and signed by a State Licensed Landscape Architect and which includes all proposed/existing plant materials ( location, type, size, quantity) , an irrigation plan, a grading plan, an approved site plan, and a copy of the entitlement conditions of approval . The landscape plans shall be in conformance with Section 9607 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . The set must be approved by both departments prior to issuance of building permits . Any existing mature trees that must be removed shall be replaced at a 2 to 1 ratio with minimum 36-inch box trees, which shall be incorporated into the project ' s landscape plan. c . A grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and it must be approved (by issuance of a grading permit) . A plan for silt control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works . d. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -19- (8554d) e. Submit a Parking Management Plan for review and approval by the Community Development Department which contains parking space designations for tenants/employees . e. Perimeter fencing plans shall be submitted for review and approval which depict decorative materials . f . A planned sign program shall be submitted and approved for all signing . Said program shall be approved prior to the first sign request . 5 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows : a . The developer shall submit water improvements plans, on a separate utility plan, showing service connections to all lots , fire hydrants and other appurtenances in accordance with applicable U.P.C. , Ordinances and Public Works Standards . these plans shall be approved by the Public Works Standards . L'hese plans shall be approved by the Public Works Water Division. b. The water system shall be located with vehicular travelways and dedicated to the City. The Developer/Homeowner ' s Association shall be held responsible for repairing any enhanced pavement , if the water mains, etc . , require repair or maintenance . c . The Developer will be responsible for payment of any additional fees adopted in upcoming Water Division Financial Master Plan. d. The Developer shall submit mitigation measures for approval by the City which will address the following deficiencies in the water system. 1) Reducing the peak hour demands . 2) Increasing the water supply sources (wells and importing facilities) . 3) Increasing the water storage facilities ( reservoirs) . e. Developer shall submit water system hydraulic calculations to ensure system adequacy and line sizing . No ten inch ( 10" ) lines will be allowed. Twelve inch (12" ) water mains shall be used if calculations shown ten inch ( 10" ) line capacities . f . The water system shall have two sources , i .e. , looped. No dead ends . The water system shall be installed per the Public Works Department ' s standards, ordinances and policies . g . No combustible construction shall occur until an approved water system is installed. h. Low volume fixture heads shall be incorporated into the design of the water system of each unit . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -20- (8554d) i . Developer shall use "drought tolerant" plants and turf for all common area landscaping . Landscape plans shall be approved by the Department of Public Works . j The automatic irrigation system within the public right-of-way shall be provided at water source and electrical source which is separate from the private property landscape improvements . k. Each unit shall have a separate 2-inch water service, 2-inch meter and backflow devise. 1 . All common area landscaping shall have a separate water service for irrigation. m. The Developer shall construct a 12-inch water line in Warner Avenue dedicated for Green Acres Project use in the area fronting the development . All common area irrigation shall be connected to this water line. n. On-site sewers shall be private . o . Installation of a traffic signal at Greentree Lane and Warner Avenue will be required. p. The developer will be responsible for the payment of the Traffic Impact fees at the time of final inspection. q. Submit a soils report and grading plan for Public Works approval . r . Full Public Works improvements are required to the centerline of Warner Avenue . s . Hydrology/Hydraulic studies shall be submitted . t . Drainage flows from adjacent properties shall not be obstructed. Flows shall be accommodated per Public Works Department requirements . u. On-site drainage shall not be directed to adjacent properties, but shall be handled by a Public works Department approved method. v. A sewer study shall be submitted for Public Works Department approval . The developer shall design and construct the on-site and off-site sewer system required to serve the development w. A Parkway License Agreement shall be required whereby the owner shall maintain landscaping within public right-of-way on Spine Road. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -21- (8554d) I' 6 . Fire Department requirements are as follows : a . Automatic sprinkler systems will be installed throughout to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Building Code Standards . Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. b. A fire alarm system will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code Standards . Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. The system will provide the following . 1) Water flow, valve tamper and trouble detection. 2) 24 hour supervision. c . Fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire code Standards . d. On-site fire hydrants will be provided in number and at locations specified by the Fire Department . e. Fire lanes will be designated and posted to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department Standard No . 415 . If fire lane violations occur and the services of the Fire Department are required, the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. f . Address numbers will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards . The size of the numbers will be the following : 1) The number for the building will be sized a minimum of ten (10) inches with a brush stroke of one and one-half (1-1/2) inches . 2) Individual units will be sized a minimum of four (4) inches with a brush stroke of one-half ( 1/2) inch. g . Installation or removal of underground flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks will comply with Orange County Environmental Health and Huntington Beach Fire Deparment Standards . h. Dimensions for Fire Access includes 24 ' or 27 ' fire lanes , turnarounds and 17 ' by 45 ' radius turns . Comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department Standard No . 401 . i . Names of streets must be approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to use. Comply with Fire Department Standard 409 . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -22- (8554d) j . Submit to the Fire Department for approval a Fire Protection Plan containing requirements of Fire Department Specification No . 426 . k. Any oil wells on the site shall be located and reabandoned to City and Division of Oil and Gas specifications and standards . 7 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department . 8 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 9 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection/within twelve (12) months . 10 . The applicant shall obtain clearance from the Public Liability Claims Coordinator, Administrative Services Department, and/or shall provide a Certificate of Insurance and Hold Harmless Agreement to be executed at least five (5) days prior to the event . 11 . During construction, the applicant shall : a . Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where 1 vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c . Use low sulfur fuel ( . 05% by weight) for construction equipment; d . Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts) ; e. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts . 12 . Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7 : 00 AM to 8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays . 13 . An on-site qualified archaeologist shall monitor all initial grading and excavation activities . a . Should any cultural materials be encountered during initial site survey or during grading and excavation activities, all activity shall cease and the archaeologist shall determine the appropriate course of action. Staff Report - 2/5/91 -23- (8554d) l_ b. Should any human bone be encountered during any construction activities on the site, the archaeologist shall contact the coroner pursuant to Section 5097 . 98 and 5097 . 99 of the Public Resources Code relative to Native American Remains . Should the coroner determine the human remains to be Native American, the Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted pursuant to State Law SB 297 . 14 . Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed: a . The applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and submit a copy to Community Development Department . b. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and conditions of approval specified herein. c . Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein shall be accomplished . d. A landscape license agreement to perform all maintenance necessary to the landscaping installed in public right-of-way areas on the Spine Road. e. A program for participation in OCTD "Commuter Network" shall be submitted. f . Tentative Parcel Map No . 90-268 shall be recorded. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - MEADOWLARK CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAT: 1 . The Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan received and dated January 29 , 1991 shall be the approved Master Plan with the following modifications : a . Residential vehicular access from Roosevelt Lane South shall be limited to a fire emergency gate only. b. A possible future bus turn out/shelter facility shall be located on Heil Avenue. 2 . Design of Heil Avenue must include provision of right-of-way to allow left-turn lanes at Del Mar and permit on-street parking to remain in place on the north side of Heil, in this area . 3 . The public street through the PRD shall not have any direct access from individual lots , but only via local access streets . No guard gates shall be on public street . 4 . Phasing of project should include traffic study update for each phase, to predict impact and needed adjustments . Staff Report - 2/5/91 -24- (8554d) 5 . Installation of traffic signal at Del Mar/Heil shall be required with first residential phase . 6 . Proportional share of Heil/Graham signalization shall be paid prior to start of final residential phase, as determined by traffic signal warrants . 7 . Spine Road circulation system shall be completed prior to the first residential building permit issuance . 8 . Phase II archeological studies for each phase of development shall be completed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits for the phase. 9 . An interim fire access to Pearce Drive shall be prepared for review and approval by Community Development, Fire Deparment and Public Works . 10 . An interim paving plan for Pearce Drive, 400 feet east of Roosevelt Lane shall be constructed concurrent with development of Phase Two (2) . 11 . A commitment to serve the project shall be received from the Orange county Sanitation District and the City Water Department prior to issuance of building permits for any phase of development . 12 . All standards and requirements of the Meadowlark Specific Plan shall continue to apply. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Area map 2 . Tentative Parcel Map dated January 29 , 1991 3 . Meadowlark Plaza site plan, landscape plan, elevations and floor plans dated January 29 , 1991 4 . Letter from Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc . dated January 21, 1991 5 . Letter from Thomas M. Dawes, Orange County Sanitation District, dated Septrmber 14 , 1990 6 . Letter from Jeffrey R. Renna, Water Operations Manager, dated September 20, 1990 7 . Meadowlark Conceptual Master Plan dated January 29 , 1991 8 . Meadowlark Specific Plan HS: kj 1 Staff Report - 2/5/91 -25- (8554d) : LlmULl LL— co .. ...R1 2"C2IDROIECOii _— OR RI-FP2F • MH RI RI RR;__�m RI 30 _RI � RI � RI I-FP2�� HEIL -- —.vt�-- ' � F4ir..—I =� ]Rl R 2 $ R2 RI � RI-FP2 FP2RI •a oo.enoo, °, RI FP2 P•2 MH RI R3 RI-FP2 a RI-FP2- _ 1R ROS r ,..•RAN R I o F- R t�FRI11 r RI a RI �RI !--"-- DDNLYN� RI _ R I-FP2 • RI RI u + RI iR4NMAR LR �• _ 10 R I-FP2 N 'N 4 RI ROS-01 EDMONDS LR, Er MEADOWLARK I s R2 SPECIFIC PLAN —� RI �—.n �� R I-FP2 i OILDRED LR, ...•avc, .,11 I u R I-FP )9600 0 W RI-FP2 T C2r 8 �. w\. i ROS-FP2 TROPHY DR. j/ Q � eW tl;A: a stry R4 Rl-FP2 OMME_RCIAL a' - tL i �, 'gel m �p oC4+ 8 S °"'Qr- s� YvlEw LR C4-FP2 I a a RI °' a _OP :-FP2 WARNER RI RI I r El D RA00 DR 1V6ER, •+ 0 R2� R2 L ( Ri �RII�!RI�I 3 RI / . C4 N n� z r R2 o R I PENDLE SON DF, R2 Rx F �I I I d sl a .�Ji : I RI RI RI ,�I �••R1• n-- R3 23 n a ; RI RI RI �z -•:°' RI RID I I J I .• eRuwEN CUP90-9 With Spec- Permits/ � CDP90-7/PPSA90-7/ TT14215/Development Agreement HUNT INGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 90-268 II PORTION OF S.W. 1/4 SEC., SECTION 21, T.5S., R.11,W. I Cm OF RNT*MM KACK COLNM OF ORANW m MAR LAW Ll I I j FKISTHO au,CN . E%6TM7 M06 E NcaE PARK±- .y _,. �. v,CffTY bw . TRACT No!a 12 TYPICAL$Ecnom. • ;t t ` - r CA'v NATURAL PARKw_.,�� SNOT r FAI.IY OEDaED TRACT NO.TW5 _ 4 a,ae I.b a J, - � SNGIF FA/A Y bE'M)i0 I - _ TRACT W 10449 4&7 ACM ' i. Tyv m 9TTET occnoM . ' `�:; \ �- I /!.- I - S.KIE FAMU DEan® 1 F j TRACT NO 9757 a J' jl �► I mrYEr<uo OWE l AV-� OWIlA/AI4l1Cd11T NIOPOS®EUMO TXEQ UyLrrm O � 11I A179TS / ASSESSOR!AAACEL MAIM M ..c"oa� WO lAE M.RIARY EJJ /A.. „Ammo / I ExeTw LAAO� F�POSED LAT USE A / t r A F• E%MTM Zom mO M^o E CONSULTING GROG MEADOWLARK PROPERTY �...�.. ...... r n...".. .. I PLANT LEGEND j EMRV ACLERT TREE I UGERSTROEYIA WDIG WJE wRRE ' 1 __ /�\�/\�\ V EHT wASHWOTONEu pOBUSTA.ar[.I..w r.N rwr CCIRNERACCEHiU4 TREE AREG.STR RDW WN4 W20Ei .OUEFR roar _ _I PROIELT!REYE STREET TREE MARKET -- DRUG V®PROPE LINE SCREEMTREErt i PUMU TAS ALERiOUA TRDOO(i000' 1000.R,.•E T.[E ;SNOPS SSNOPS 2 $HOPS 1 EHD 6UHOPARAW6l0TTREE �URAHDA usgSiOUAo .aacuuNw e(T IMEIC PRRRIrq LOT TREE .' I CUPu,rO AXACMOICOES.CrrROr ra00 1101E 1""101"El —+\ • r • r `0'�(�`'c,�rl '/(/V�,jJj ''//''��..,,tt��JJJJ�}M1 n .."'•��J) .r w ru �'. (�J4jhr WASH14GTONIAROBUSTA.rFi4w lur— .. •'1/ /�./ /V i�f/ .� SCREENSNRUBS � - ..n• •_•rsur i � OLFUMOE0.ESCALONy 1(ri06uA - `,, NEOGROw SHRUBS RAPHIbLER.S.ESCALOHI&UGUSTRUAI W �/ (lry- J' jtj�✓] / V _ ALCEM SHRUBS , _ W / EM1S.HEYEROUL'S.ACMPUR AYUS RILAH IRIS, Ip SN�tS / .e _ MPNIQLIR IOPE Y.e I •/ \}"J. �/� � / � `'' '� � ,v TALL CESGVE TURF.ICE PIANT.RED APYIE,APfEHN. VMI�� f��f / YYY .� 1-aJ� PEUR(ANM1R(SGEVOLA w..r.�n rI �./ -..K./' �� /T�� ' � nor.• .o,...,rr....., .i ►AD W V/ � 7..✓� /�" ..,.....r.... , i ;, I I _ �...•......r�.o.N,...r...,•r..�.•.,...ur.R........:.".:�.. ...r.......00,.......o..•.,r....,...>..,...<.r.,.,... ,R.......W e — — __ .•... I PAD C _ c {i f PAD D �,.�...,r..... .....,........r ..,......... 4.......N......,n.....r � ..a...� . X.m.,.r Ro, .o�......,.a WARNER AVENUE rx � W W J LJ r f r n f E:ADOWLARK PLAZA - 2 r MCG ARCHITECTS ® LANWCAPE CoOMMPT FUN "r"r" "" y iiuiin�i�6i I _ _w yy}rr.duw nib �rHA//i111iNifli/If11/G �11%Yrl/liin//N 11 a•-i I b qr.l 17 r r i _ ,u.u.r.II wi i f'.01 n m uglill lil UI i Tli.ul�rd�ui ••R�IUI 1ltr/uunnrl..liru•••.ui�III�I:Irrnl�In�n�R� 4i uIIlldiiilllillll�llrll pl l l e 0 �n Il/.-I n Ili i 111w-I11:Iluululll`111 111/ul ur1 ullll .a1�ir.Nz\!O!�};Nr1 \I•�.Y!�r[r!... .rrr1 •Lre1O M. �i111411UNI II II+I.I !!nl�l!u�iluliullq�IFul1 4.1:.1 IIrLLIIw111•rl l if if if l:If I11f 1i 111f 1V!IiIII,�IIiiI:IIiII•ni,i l♦i♦.i.e'lilrru•I►,fll�rJa \..i.ur.f.�;lr�i:ii■•) •rr.\i\�Y��r\r.ri� rr liira..•■ 1' NAPIER- SHOPS 3 SOUTH ELEVATION ELEVATION ..�Ilr I rlr�iL�.,' —�= IIIII�I�Urll,Lt•FIII.ribnu ub�'.Iu r'e�o r nur y�i�. Iq.;.li 4i- t.ut-.��a .p•I�. r•� r•I�.,ce .....- -- wi1_!u.�-e..al! .nt••-••••- .ru. . n'ln"i:-nliir• e•'..:KI-!�p!liva!, in _ _ n/i�..l ult_ .ri� ,:prrrrrr.rr iirlrarari.\<a.w.�.w,i��rNrr��rl�•��rl��ri�r :..—yes-+a.-I \L.�r..a..� - �— i��t�� .�'J��! �I��It i®��®I,1��ili�■ �� rl i�3S�� SOUTH ELEVATION -- 'tea ��•�o _ �IIIIIII�IIII.III.IIII: :,Illlli l��llll.l.:::;��1I1°III 111. 111I.III Ii �! 41 I - — - - - �r----— III::I11II.11 1..Irii1 I I1111•il1 llllr r'!,i I I I I,1 Illllr IIIIi1111 r..,�Irll d�.,J.�l 111.• '` i0 1.�g ��'�� nib i LI �i�� /0 6♦ fl R i /►� %a` /' N 7- _ I�':� �, In��rrl ��I�!�.'� /eAf±�i•♦(� !s�4,- 1■ gli w t�.1� I ��.�.�//� /u�:l►!,A�� %�I; `�� s�lll'J ®9fi®' !<��LJ JE SHOPSDRUG STORE • • lilit:i)�;i I��(�11 iil 1 1 i i i i i�iuliluiii 1 1 ui liuliiliiililiiiu?,;,, SHOPS I SOUTH ELEVATION Lu 25 MARKET I,1111 I1r r•.Il rinyrin'1 111111111111III•I.rllllilr„dry DRUG SHOPS FRONT • MEADOWLARK CALIFORNIAWARNER AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH, r'aic./':. :.iil-n�. .Gi..,i1�ii"i�lr�{1 Qr ui i fiia •1 1 IFU 1/r.1.,1 If�I1r{■Ii/Ir�I{ai�a11/f r�r�• I�I'11n�tI11 �.{a�'ala � ■�Ilil irr��1. Et rrpaal prrf/1rna r•uf. •"'�ri.r..�..rr r�ry rOr � I ♦♦.rrial� ��i��ir�I�;av�asrliiii�•i �iif�irr}��i iiii SHOPS • 71 " .7 .. ' MARKET NORTH ELEVATION m�s \. - -- — - - adliii ,il:u:ufii gluauw�awal u ♦ y � ie..gliffIi■ g �I�..�,�.iN� 1 11f 1-t�il�:... '.�^�i�'r��r!Ii ... f'"' �i\V� DRUG STORE&SHOPS 2 NORTH ELEVATION IV 1.0 III�f1111111 � NIWYYarNrau" _- _ __ tir'r Nr�r rrcur rrarlr rr ffr i�{i1.4pi./rrlrlLlMi1 I1�1 Y�_//r�'' rr..uinam►►�•yy ryn11�OlHflwla. Iala11it... - rN111{II,I,.,MNIm /rrwrar 111�/a 11/Ia1�11 �-�- __,pq!rs!NYMMIgn�y11IIlrrgora��a..;a�r.i��Cr�.ru1,�11 i 1�Oaq Mq u{q{ili/of n1 t 1 n11 n/,nl g11iN1� LI Iq/Idinnl �i�i i i.aa.ea'P•��.a?�Srno;d.=•e�;r_;�a-!�...r:.�.c:r� ..«c11��{h,i�ali��l�It tI11 g1�Iq 12�{�.tliingi Ra ll�f�{Itil r�i/1i1 IVfi.Y,y,e�.ti•Iy,�nSm SIYO�Y ti�J�D3 0 VL 2.2 SHOPS I-EAST EL.EVATION SHOPS I NORTH ELEVATION u y 1. .... MARKETD. O. REAR ELEVATIONS MEADOWLARK I �YI r I I, II NORTH ELEVATIONS 60� Ls+c� 5?ra H S hWrAY _ nEl i — l sect/cN � I e I _ JJ L, IC ° sEcr/ov e-c J i SOUTH ELEVATIONE! — - � -- i � �r• j —1 I I I �e WEST(ROOSEVEIT ST)ELEVATION -, mae.a.00e..nas,.., _ I ^n c c I C . - r ° UEE I IMP. ESA I' ao r �— c MAiDWRLA I i c BONANZASd Ypp� � ,F EAST ELEVATION SHOPS 4 ELEVATIONS $cA" Iro•.I•a MEADOWLARK PLAZA FLOOR PLAN WARNER AVENUE HUNTINGTON BFACFI,C,%I:FORMA .S - r-.- -- I I' SOUTH(WARNER AVE)ELEVATION I e TO PAD"A" —. 1 i 0 i I 161A RTA, per V� g U�M a _— OWER • EAST ELEVATION -� —I OK5' SI NORTH ELEVATION c WEST(ROOSEVELT ST)ELEVATION 2 r�•; ;nw PAD A & B ELEVATIONS U < � ' SCALE:2". .1'-0FLOOg..:PLAN MEADOWLARK PLAA WARNER AVENUE ` HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA V A SA GS K EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION AC SA vS B SOUTH(WARNER AVE)ELEVATION 3{}� s� A SA VNC.S ;L y NORTH ELEVATIONo Q f c _A C' }1' PAD C ELEVATIONS -< • SCJLLE:IIE'•1'-0' MEADOWLARK PLAZA WARNER AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA i SOUTH ELEVATION VALE l/r-VT lh- -- SAGUENAY . EAST ELEVATION SCALE I/e•.i•o• WEST ELEVATION SCALE var.v-T ' uwr r+wa..wr < INAMOA A BONAN'LA EMBLEM'. J o NORTH ELEVATION SCALE ire•.ro• '°D c c r ET c �^ 2Lv U �4A ` cs r - PAD D ELEVATIONS U a< SCALE:111,roe MEADOWLARK PLAZA r o r - ^ r WARNER HUNTINGTON BEACH, FORNIA 8 r^ LEGAL DESCRIPTION A SHOPPING CENTER PROJL. FOR BOLSA REALTY 9340 BOLSA AVENUE ^-!^r WESTMIN TER 8939 683 M 521 E A D O - W L A R K P L A Z A9 MCC W A R N E R A V E N U E �^ H U N T I N G T 0 N B E A C H C A L I F 0 R N I A ar-chi tee t.s PROJECT ADVISOR: r<i r/r .'L .. • .•.. I., I•NII• ,LII•r1• ^ PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP hrM.•I r 1!•�I• L II I• � 1 CORPORAIC PLAZA I••• r/.rM ur n I»•I OFFICE WOMER YEN [Ou RRT ROOM MEZZANINE ]TOIIAOE AREA EQUIPMENT LULL AARTTOR M MEZZANINE uNE RnNfo �Op O ER u]NrcR] ANADIR AIR NARDLER Poor EMPLOYEE LWN f [L E CI RcOKCAL ? �EL pC�Y AL I I TfAIREI CAT WA'_! [sra• ITORADE jl . i wARERWX PRDOU"MEP pp E 6ROCF RY P1M)OOD!CDOIfR OfilCf l T.RA OUNGEEf ]TOGOE FREEZER OM IA.. EAT FRCP .[Al COOLER i1511 DACOOLER COOLER YEN ^I RD Fm MfP DAIRY lAI!] WOMEN V /VVV a I 1 I I I � 4 i I j I i II fRonR SALES ULI!l AREA UOIgR]ALE] 1 I I � MARKET �.,y c a r >s[:r. FLOOR PLANT SCALE llr-l*-W • I i _a m f •ARERY]ALE] o HARD ARu V w B r.rrn� � ate ARER` a< ` OP1"iP° MEADOWLARK DAtRY MLE CDNCOVRX IAKEIM IAKERY PLAZA L COOLER ow _ IFT w \ MRAOE GOOIER fRFEZfR WARNER AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 1 O I LOADING DOCK COMPACTOR RECENNG [[tT a.OUT MOMLM MEN NANAOl11 1 PALLET STACK/KG AREA s[ .«ourtrq rEN[NN. ''"N^ =:z uNCNnooN L "«" W [4CNmE3 v I 41 / l SALES r T Si S E, - e� DRUG STORE FLOOR PLAN SCALE ve•-ro' ra; ® .� GJ c ci E«ovr 00 ® c__ TOAR � tl r. • i r NURSERY iU a% orEM 4L 7 r SNAIL rA•m COv[R ONLY - - - -- - -- - MEADOWLARK PLAZA WARNER AVENUE ^. HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 11 i ' - Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. ARCHAEOLOGY—PALEONTOLOGY—HISTORY—GEOSCIENCES 5232 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 5, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Phone:714.1898•7877 Fax: 714/891.7458 January 21 , 1991 City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Att: Hal Simmons Re : Archaeological Investigations: Ora-368 Meadowlark Village Shopping Center Dear Mr. Simmons: Pursuant to your request, we have attached a figure which indicates tfe results of the radiocarbon dating on Ora-368 (north) which is located on property owned by Sol sa P.eal ty, Previous excavations on this property in 1989 by SRS indicated that the portion of the site, located within the right-of-way of Warner Avenue Street Widening, appeared to be a fringe area of occupation of the main site. The main site was located south of Warner Avenue and evaluated in 1977 and 1979 by SRS. The current excavations for Bolsa Realty included the remainder of the field which showed surface indications of an archaeological site (i .e. surface shell fish remains ) . In July and August of 1990, an auger, program was conducted which included the drilling of 40 holes every ten meters within a 100 meter by 50 meter grid, The .lack of artifactual materials ( . quartz flake) and the minimal amounts of shell recovered from these holes necessitated an additional mechanical excavation program. Four backhoe trenches were excavated both parallel and perpendicular to Warner Avenue, covering the full extent of the site. A single hammer-grinder was recovered as a result of these investigations. The backhoe work identifiec small discete areas of greater (although still sparse) shell concentrations. Four column samples were hand-excavated in these areas . Three additional artifacts ( 1 bead, 1 projectile point base, and 1 worked shell piece) , and 5 stone flakes from tool manufacturing were recovered from these excavations. The shell remains were processed and found to contain insufficient quantities to add to the information already available from other excavations on this site. The shell samples were then submitted to the University of Georgia Radiocarbon Laboratory for dating. - u1 -22-55 iU'Z AM P02 Ora-368/pg.2 The extensive dating sequence processed during these investigations was important in documenting the overall use of this site through time. As can be seen on the attached figure, the sequence indicates that the site was used sparsely around 2,200 B.P. (years Before Present) ; heavily between 3,500-4,500 B.P. ; and again sparsely between 5,000 and 6,000 B .P. These ranges not only verified the previous dates received in 1979 and 1986, bu. also added the information that this site extended back further in time than previously thought. Most significantly, this site follows the pattern which has been established for Bolsa Chica Mesa and the western portion o` Huntington Beach Mesa. The site was used most extensively between 3,500 to 4,500 B .P. and was not use at all in the more recent, Late Prehistoric time period (ca. 1500 B.P. to present) . A Final report on this property is currently in preparation which present; a compilation of information on the site as a whole (all three excavations: and compares and contrasts this site to others in the region. We expect that this report will be completed within the next month. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to call . Sincerely, Nancy . Whitney-De tels , Ph. D. President encl . 01-22-91 10: 23AM P 0 3 i 1000 1979 loaf) 1990 WARNER SOUTH WARNER NORTH COLUMN 'A' COLUMN '8' COLUMNS I %C. *D' 'I 2000 f 1 i t 3000 t � I 1 4000 E 1 t 6400 1 1 1 1 N N awo I o � w a i ro ' Figure _ Radiocarbon fates From Excavations on Ora-368 f.. ITAT j N b°0,0 I"OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS I ,ram .�•' -. u� ' N OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 O s,°i195, 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 RANGE CO%J (714) 962-2411 I September 14 , 1990 Mr. Mike Adams 1 Community Development Director Community Development Department c-i tN> of Hunt4-nri-pn PeaLr-h ^O17A'Upgq,,'M�nlT 2000 Main Street y1 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Vr"'StoN Dear Mike: Subject: Meadowlark Master Plan/Conditional Use Permit No. 90-45 Tentative Parcel Map No. 90-268 (Meadowlark Airport) With regard to the above referenced project, we have no objection to providing sewer service to the 15 . 0 acres commercial center adjacent to Warner Avenue as the Phase I development. As you will recall , your city cooperated with the District in phasing this development, and occupancy of further development should await completion of the Slater Avenue Pump Station. For your information, on September 12 , 1990 , the Directors of Districts 3 and 11 approved a design contract for the badly needed improvements to the Slater Avenue Pump Station. We anticipate that the new station will be operational in the fall of 1992 . Ti 1rou nave a., further yL'E'st101:S, pleases ^OP.taCt ::1? at 714/962-2411 . Ve truly yo , 40-mas M. Dawes Director of Engineering TMD: jt cc: Morse Consulting Group EHG/EIR5:HS.L1 ' f • �i � = , CITY OF.1-1lJNT1NGTON EACH..'._ INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION . HWM6T0N BEACH To Mike Adams`_ From -Renna Community Deve}opment Director Water , Operations Manager Subject TENTATIVE P.M. 90-268 Date September 20 , 1990 MEADOWLARK MASTER PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The developer for the subject project has requested that a "Will Service" letter be addressed to you. Although the 15 . 0 acre -commercial center adjacent to Warner Avenue is the only development under consideration, the following will apply. The City of Huntington Beach is able to furnish only the minimum level of water supply to serve the proposed development' s fire and 3omestic needs . Deficiencies in the water system identified in the 1988 Water Master Plan indicate that the following conditions may not be met, which could affect this development : o Peak hour demands cannot be met unless the mitigation measures identified in the 1988 Water System Master Plan are addressed or constructed. o Current supply sources (water wells and importing facilities ) are not sufficient to meet existing demands . o Existing storage facilities are inadequate for existing or ultimate needs . If you have any questions , or we can be of further assistance , please contact Eric R . Charlonne of my staff at extension 5921 . JRR: ERC: gd 1.7,, ..... � . 1990 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVCLOPMENT PLANNING DIV �srr l z � a SECTION A-A COMMERCIAL ENTRY/PROJECT SPINE ROAD / \ CHURCH R1 SINGLE FAMILY r'r- - B D ETACHED ..•. --I� •�--- ' MOBILE HOME PARK �,^ .- SECTION B-B -- -- PROJECT SPINE ROAD!PEARCE 'DRIVE w•M1 , SECTION C-C \ _ ROOSEVELT LANE(SOUTH) NATURAL PARK (CF-R) PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO r_,•- -, I-•,• I +-' - / -.. -- -- tzi NEIGHBORHOOD PARK , SECTION D•D ROOSEVELT LANE (NORTH) — SINGLE.FAMILY /--�IETACHED'18. C/'/ 7.0-0.U./AC.'MAX. ' SINGLE FAMIL'f 3 SINGLE FAMflY DETACHED DETACHED "•L_: I - (R 1) w (R1)j), / � �t / I r QPEARCE '- MEDIUM DENSIZY -v B ��- _ 20.0 AC' /,[�1ES 00'BUFFER �r - --- _ /.. / ,240 UNITS L / Du14Cm"- a - — • N 12 D.U./AC.MAX. �� I RESIDENTIAL f0iW I MEDIUM HIGH bENSITX 1 ' _D D - -12.0 AC. _ - _/ .. - r----�-J 240 UNITS :�� t 20 D.U./AC:MAX: 'Fi SINGLE FAMILY I DETACHED _ F" (R1) i PROPOSED FUTURE DAY CARE FACILITY .. ._-_• - - _ -C C 7. FERNHILL RESIDENTIAL -- -• I / (R4) COMMERCIAL 15.0 AC.-----�� - T _ VACANT° a a COMM RCIAL -� NO LEFT TURN EXIT' SECTION E•E RESIDENTIAL ENTRY SECTION F•F PRIVATE DRIVE CONCEPTUAL Meado �pert MASTERPLAN NOT TO SCALE A CONCEPTUA TERPLAN �41yORSE- CONSULTING GROUP 1� • WW PLANNING • £NGiAEERING • SI/R►'£►'iNC• Attachment I MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS A. PURPOSE B. SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT D. APPLICATION PROCEDURE 1. Conditional Use Permit 2. Conceptual Master Plan 3. Statement Required 4. Phasing Plan for Development E. SEWER AND WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY F. CIRCULATION 1. Perimeter Streets 2. Internal Circulation G. TRAFFIC CONTROL H. TRANSIT FACILITIES I. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES J. GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMICITY K. ARCHAEOLOGY L. PERIMETER BUFFERS M. ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT AREAS N. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS O. HOMEOWNERS OR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION P. APPROVAL PERIOD MEADOWLARK SPECIFIC PLAN i A. PURPOSE - On the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adopted an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. This amendment designated approximately 65 acres of land located approx- imately 600 ft. north and east of the intersection of Bolsa Chica Street and Warner Avenue as a Planned Community. The General Plan Document, Land Use Element Amendment 87-2C, states that the Planned Community designation is to be imple- mented through adoption of a Specific Plan. The following policies were adopted by the City Council to provide direction for preparation of a Specific Plan: 1. The 15 acre retail center shall be located on Warner Avenue extending between Roosevelt Street and the residential project to the east. 2. The total nurr:ber of residential units, including any proposed affordable units, to be constructed on the 50 acre portion of the property die north of the commercial portion, shall not exceed 600 units and shall be distributed among several product types. 3. A buffer shall be provided between the existing single family homes and any attached residential units which are developed at greater than 7 units per acre. 4. An internal traffic circulation plan shall be provided that will: a. Provide street connections between Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue that would not encourage non-project related through traffic. b. Limit the amount of traffic on Pearce Street to a total of 2500 average daily trips. c. Locate vehicular access points to Warner Avenue and Heil Avenue so as to minimize traffic conflicts. S. Provide a phased development plan which coincides with the available capacity J in the sewer and water systems. Meadowlark Specific Plan -3_ (06311_)} 6. Within 60 days of City approval of the first entitlement for development, the airport operation will cease. 7. This Specific Plan enacted through Zone Change No. 87-13 will be in effect until a subsequent zone change is adopted. The Planning Commission shall conduct an annual review of the Specific Plan until such time as a master plan is approved for the site. The Meadowlark Specific Plan is designed to meet the planning requirements of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. It is intended to serve as a general set of conditions and regulations that will promote the orderly development of the pro— perty and provide direction for preparing a plan for development while providing sufficient flexibility to permit design creativity. B. SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES — The Meadowlark Specific Plan encompasses that area as delineated on the Exhibit 1. 2. Legal Description — The Meadowlark Specific Plan includes the real property described as follows: Parcel 1 in the City of Huntington Beach as per map filed in Book i45, Page 21 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County; and Parcels 24, 25 and 26 in the City of Huntington Beach, as per map filed in Book 146, Page 24 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT See Environmental Impact Report 87-2 D. APPLICATION PROCEDURE — Any request for a development proposal shall be accompanied by an application for a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map. Such applications shall include preliminary site plans, grading plans, floor and elevation plans and a statement of statistics. All plans shall be submitted con— currently and shall meet the following requirements. Meadowlark Specific Plan_ —2— (0631D) OE 4 lit • — �` y r � _ 3 — u O ML u O t, F.v'E 1 1 � - J/+ � } mIOOI°CC« �( 50 LA,,4n- CAPE { �--- =SETBACK---� £I f '1 BUFFER --I - - E ' IAL j N J ' 1 -- — ---- -�'c:. _. -_•._� _.= .. .:l � J.�-----ram "f 15. AC . ? "�--20' SETBACK a T _J � \µrC:Q 2 J---..�wARHER lJ �� I� i l t 50' LAN' j `� ! i I j I i I ' ITail I i i u S Ell OGRACO GR � ACGEoS z a g i SETEACK !7TFT 1{1{ /-ram-yJ N �Z I I ��1^ I�---+�---y1 � • 11 j s i.._- ¢ F-�.vJCIE - MEADO WLARK SPECIFIC PLAN huntington beach Manning division I. Conditional Use Permit — Any proposed development within the specific plan area shall be subject to the approval of a conditional use permit as provided in Article 984 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. 2. Conceptual Master Plan — A conceptual master plan for the overall project shall be submitted at the time of the first Conditional Use Permit, the conceptual master plan shall include the following: a. Perimeter buffer alignment b. Location of pedestrian walkways; c. Circulation pattern of vehicular traffic; d. Use of common open space areas; e. Layout showing proposed sewage and water facilities. 3. Statement Required — A detailed statement shall also be included containing the following information: a. Distance from the property to any known geological hazard; -� b. Existence of known contamination from hazardous materials on—site; C. Phase i results and Phase II proposals for the Archeological Assessment of the Meadowlark Airport; d. Gross area of product type within the total project area boundary. e. Number and type of units and number of bedrooms; f. Total number of units and number of units and bedrooms per gross acre; g. Schedule and sequence of development if proposed in phases. 4. Phasing Plan for Development A plan identifying phased development of the residential and commercial area shall be submitted in conjunction with the submittal of the conceptual master plan and any conditional use permits. Meadowlark Specific Plan -4— (06311)) E. SEWER AND WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY Prior to issuance of building permits within any of the area designated as a separate phase of development on the phasing plan, clearance shall be obtained from the Orange County Sanitation District and City Water Department stating that such development will not adversely impact the sewer and water systems. Such clearance shall be in the form of a letter to the Director of Public Works and the Director of Commi:nity Development. F. CIRCULATION The conceptual master plan shall establish a plan concurrent with the issuance of the first entitlement. This conceptual master plan will establish the general alignment of Pearce Street if it connects into the new development, the connector street alignment and the internal circulation pattern of the development. StDndarrs for streets and drives sha?1 be as follows: �i ?. t�erimeter Streets — The street right—of—way for 'Varner Avenue, Heil Avenue, and Pearce Street shall be dedicated as public streets and fully improved to city standards. The eastern side of Roosevelt Lane (approximately 500 linear feet south of Pearce Street) shall be fully dedicated and fully improved to City standards, if needed. 2. Internal Circulation — Circulation within the Specific Plan Area shall be such that a connection between Heil Avenue with Warner Avenue shall be provided. Project access points shall generally be at Warner Avenue/Leslie Lane and Heil Avenue/ Del Mar Lane. Any access to Pearce Street shall be such that traffic on Pearce Street does not exceed 2500 average daily trips. Roosevelt Lane shall not be a through street to Warner Avenue. The points of intersection with Warner Avenue, Heil Avenue, Pearce Street and Roosevelt Street shall generally conform to or accomplish the objectives identified in Exhibit 11111. Specific locations shall be determined through the Conditional Use Permit process. Meadowlark Specific Plan. —5— (0531D) G. TRAFFIC_ CONTROL - The Planning Commission, upon recommendation of the Department of Public Works, shall determine the need for traffic control devices (i.e., traffic signals). Such determination shall include the appropriate time of installation. The developer shall pay the entire cost of installing traffic signals at Heil Avenue/Del Mar Lane, and Warner Avenue/Leslie Lane, at the entrances to the development. If the proposed project requires access to Bolsa Chica Street from Pearce Street then the developer shall pay one-fourth of the cost of a traffic signal at Bolsa Chica and Pearce. The developer shall provide for the future installation of any such improvements prior to issuance of building permits. H. TRANSIT FACILITIES - Bus turnouts and bus shelters shall be provided at locations designated by the Department of Public Works and Orange County Transit District. The design of such shelters and turnouts shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and Orange County Transit District. =� 1. AIRAIR QUALITY MITINGATION MEA. t;RE. 1. Ridesharing The Orange County Transit District has a rideshare program, called "Commuter Network," which matches origins and destinations of commuters by computer. The developer shall design a program for the site prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Pedestrian Access The project shall include pedestrian accessways from the interior of the site to the existing bus stops on the area streets and to the shopping center. The accessways shall be paved, lighted and handicapped accessible. 3. Child Care Facilities The provision of neighborhood child care facilities are encouraged in the project in order to reduce the frequency and length of trips related to child care responsibilities. -Meadowlark Specific Plar• (063 iD) J. GEOLOGY/SOILS/SEISMICITY - The following geology, soils and seismicity measures shall be employed prior to the issuance of building permits: I. Submittal of a structural engineering study evaluating proposed foundation designs with respect to ground shaking and liquification hazards on the property. The study shall be subject to the review and approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. Foundations and structural components of the buildings shall be designed according to recom- mendations contained within the structural engineering study. 2. Submittal of a soils study detailing grading and site preparation recom- mendations. This study shall be subject to the approval of the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. Grading and site preparation shall be accomplished in accordance with recommendations presented in the soils study. 3. Submittal of a soils analysis identifying the absence or presence of methane gas and/or contamination by hazardous materials. If contamination is found, all affected areas must be clean'-d up to the satisfaction of the City and other appropriate agencies. If methane gas is present, a mitigation plan must be submitted to and approved by the City and other appropriate agencies. K. ARCHAELOGY Prior to the issuance of entitlements, an archaeological analysis of three areas on the Meadowlark Airport, identified in the existing archaeological assessment (see Exhibit 2) shall be conducted. The analysis will include some excavations to determine the existence of historical 19th century habitation and American Indian habitation, pre-19th century. Meadowlark Specific Plan -?- t0631 D) On - 0 200 feet r 0 50 meters J / r i / AREA X ! A,PP!ANC PA.:�rC'NG / i t / AREA 1 <20 "f17 I?f y(IC Q J�4 0 0 0�0 c WARNER AVENUE MEADOWLARK: AREAS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONCERN EXHIBIT 2 L. PERIMETER BUFFERS A landscaped perimeter buffer shall be provided between existing off-site single family units and any development related multi family units pursuant to section N, Development Standards, see number 3 for specific standards. M. ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT AREAS The configuration of the property for which this Specific Plan is prepared is such that there are two (2) district areas. These areas are delineated on the Specific Plan Map shown on Exhibit 1. A description of Development standards for these areas are included in the following section. N. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Proposed development within the Meadowlark Specific Plan shall comply with the following standards: 1. i es_Yermitte�i arid Densities - The following uses are permitted within the specific plan area: _- a. Area A - Commercial This area must comply with the requirements and standards set forth in the C4 District (excluding hotels and motels). b. Area B - Residential The conceptual master plan and cumulative conditional use permits shall use the following scenario as a guide in describing the type and distribution of residential product types. "Three product types not exceeding 600 units shall be provided: Acres Type of Unit Density Minimum Detached of 18 Single Family 7/acre Maximum Multi Family 12/acre of 20 Medium Density Maximum Multi Family 20/acre of 12 Medium-high density Total 50 acres Meadowlark Specific Plan -9-- (0631D)