Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
File 1 of 3 - General Plan Amendment No 94-2 - Environmental (2)
Pt `ICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC HUTIGES City of HL4*irgton Beach GenerI ll Plan Update HUN'INGTON atACH City COUllcil'Review Schedule 'file City of(luntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. 'rile General Plan is the"constitution"for the City. 'rile"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future orthe City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set ofgoals and policies. These policies are illtfi utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your continents and participation arc vital to the success offhis document, if you wish t.o leant about the Cicneral Plan update or wish to make public comments,pleases utilizcAlle following schedule(See reverse side for more information): Study Session 91 Final Study Session 44 Ileld February 26, 1996 4:00 1P.N1. Flay 6, 1996 -:-Review April22, 1996,actions Study Session#2 Outstanding issues Held INlarch 11, 1996 -:-Review final action on the FIR :•Review final action on General Plan PUBLIC IlEARING NO. 1 Ileld March 25, 1996 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO.3 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 Study Session 93 •:•introduction 5:00 1P.11. April 8, 1996 'Public Ilearing Procedure •:•Revi-uv March 25, 1996,actions •:• Final action on Outstanding issues •:•Circulation Element •:•Final.Action on the Circulation Element •:•Land Use Element •:Final action on the Land Use Map •:•1_�nd Use Map •:•Final Action on the Land Use Element •:•Pival action on the EiR PUBLIC HEARING NO.2 -:-Final adoption of the Cicneral Plan 5:00 P.M. April 22, 1996 -%li lioduction •:•Public Ilearing Procedure -:-Circulation Element :•Land Use Element +L,and Use Map PUBLIC HEARiNGS AND STUDY SESSIONS v All Public Bearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of lluntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street,I luntington Beach,CA in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered 92648 'file Public He:u ings will be held in the to the City at,or prior to the public hearing if there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions,please call the Department be held in Room 13-8,both located in o;c I—., 1-01 of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic('enter to iiic at>t., :«.., ntnner direct your written communications to the Cit�k: Please Note due to the amount of information,any or all of the public hearings may be continued to C'onnic Brockway,City Clerk alternate dates. In addition,scheduled topics and Regarding the General flan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of i luntington Beach confirm the topic,time,and date,please contact 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development i luntington Beach,CA 92648 at(714)536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714)536-5227 (714)536-5227 ALI,INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit 1113TV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Ertvironmental impact Report. Ifyou challenge the City Council'saction in court,you NOTICE iS HEREBY GiVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act it was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and,therefore,an i-,nvironntental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Rcpoit No.94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of I luntington Beach Community Development Department and the Offce of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street;and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental impact Report No 94-1,the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted,the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. 'i he Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of itriplemerttation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan The Statement of Overriding Considerations idendires stgrnfeanf unavoidAlilC adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation,air quality,and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE 13E ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council,the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months t one year after City Council adoption. P_+BLIC-NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES City of Huntington Beach � 1 General Plan Update HUNTINGTON UFACH City Council Review Schedule The("ity of i luntington Beach is in the process oft c,riimg the General flan I he General Ilan A the "constitution"for the City The"constitution"contains the citven's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies These(policies are then untied to help guide decisions for the next 20 years Your conuncnts and parficipatfon ate vital to the success of this (locunrent if you wish to learn about file General plan update or wish to make public comments,please uulvc the Following schedule(See reverse side for more infonmatinn) Study Session ttl Strip,Session H3 ileld February 26,1996 5:00 P.M. April 8,1996 •:Revicw March 25, 1996,actions Study Session P2 :Circulation Element Held(March 11,1996 -.-Land Use Llemcnt -:Land Use Map PUBLIC HEARiNG NO. 1 5:00 P.M. March 25,1996 PUBLIC HEARING NO.2 •:•o,cr,iew" 5:00 P.M. April 22,1996 Public Ifearing Procedure eIntroduction •.En,vontncntal Impact Report :t'ublic hearing Piocc hire Air Quality Element •}Circulation Klement vNoisc Llemcnt -:Land Use Klement •:Environmental Hazards Element •:L.md Ilse Map •:llaiardous Materials Klement -**I;W ics Llenicn[ Final SIHIv Session tr 3 - h!ian Design L•lement 4:00 P.M. Mac 6, 1996 -*.-Recreation and Community Services Element •:Recfcw Apn1 22, 1996,actions t --historic and Cultural Resources Element •:Outstanding Issues •:•Public Facilities and Public Services Element •:Rc6ew final action on the KIR •:•Environmental Resources and Conservation Rcview final action.tin General Plan Clement 1 tirIiolising Flement FINAL PUBLIC 11V_ ING NO.3 Grn%\Ih Management Llemcnt 5:60 P.M. May 13,1996 :•C'nastal lilement :-introduction licononnc Development Element • Public I fearing Procedure :•Final action,on Outstanding issues -*-I anal Action on the C'iicirlation Element -:-Final action on the I and Use(\tap, •:Final Action on the I-and Usc lilement -'-Final action on the FIR --Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS :\II 1'.Ibhc I fearing%and Study Scs,ion%i%ill be hdd may be limited to racing only those Issues you or in the City of Iiutitingion Beach Civic('enter srrrlleUrle else laised al the public;hearing described located at 2000 Main Street,I luntington Beach,CA in this notice,or in%%ntten correspondence dclr.cled 92648 The Public hearings will be held in the to the("Ity at,or prior to the public hearing I1'thcre City Coune I Chambers and the Study Sessions\%ill are any furthcr(picstruni,please call the Ucp,utrrcm he held in Room B-9,both located in the lower level of Comnuttuy Developincnt at 530-?271 and relcr ,of the Cl%ic('enter to the abo\c Item% Please direct your wrtiten communications to the City Clerk: Please Note due to the amount ofinfunnation,ally or all of the public hearings may he continued to Connie Bmck%\a\,('l)'Clerk alternate dates in addition,scheduled topics and Reprding the General flan Updatc dements may be rescheduled to alicrume dates To City of I lunturclon lieacli p confirm the topic,time,mid date,please contact 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor either the Depatment of Community Development I luntington Beach.UA 926.18 at(714)536-S271 or the Oil ice ofthe City('Icrk at (714)54,-s22' (714)536-5227 r ALL 1 Vl PRESTIiD PERSONS are anted to All public hearings%rill he tciccisc(I lice on % attend said hearing and express opinions or submit I i B rV('Mantel 3 j evidence fix or again-it the General Plan update and - I-nvfronmeniaf Impact Report Il you itallcnge the ('Ity Council's action in Court,Volt NONCE IS I IERI' GIVEN that an Initial emironmental assessment liar the General('Lin update n;u processed and completed lit accordance with the Calitbrilia Quality Act It%\its cictrrrnv:cd that the comp:ehen,ive Gencrtd flan I'poate%%ould have a significant environnnental effect.end,ihercdbre,an I-nvuonnicival Impact Report was watiantcd Fmironntental Impact Rcnnrt No 9-1-1 \,III also be convdcrcd h fire City Council and is on file at the('ay off luntington Beach community Dcvcloivnew Department and the 011ice of the City Clerk,2000\lain Suect,and is available fur public inspection and comment by contacting the (bnunu flit y Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-S271 In conjunction with 1=mironmental lntpast Report No 94-1,the City Council will convder mitigation measures and a Slaivnicut of Ovciridmn; p Considerations Mitigation Measures ate policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmemal impacts If adopted,the%litigation%IC.lstues\will be incorporated into the final Gener.d Plait "I he Statement of Ovcrnding Considerations identifies significant advcr.e m,pacrs that numa,t 1•c - a\oidcd regardtcss of implenicniauon of the proposed policies and/or ntllgauon measures of the Enviroument,d Impact Report and Gencral Plan The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidaKe ,,,,,,..e:71;,,..,";n 0":t:.Ii„.,,r.:�i;:�.:::J ci:iulJuae,a:r nua!iny,and r o emminuicnial i—tic area\ PLFASF BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council,the portions of the General Plan that my %vithm the coastal/one must be certified by the California Coastal Commission "I"lie ceudication pr„cc- ,ill begin whir it Local Coastal ProSrdm Annerdwent submmed to the Califiomia Coastal Contuismon for rc%Iew and � ipproval 'file submittal and appro%-al may occur appromniatcly sir months to one year alter ('it\ Councll '---tin ----------- ------------- PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) 1 am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: March 4, 1996 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 4 , 199F_ at Costa Mesa, California. Y Signature PI.�L►C N,aTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES �, ► City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update MUNIIN(JON OEACH City Council Review SchcdUle The(ity of I luntington Beach is in the process of rct%rltlrig the General flan- I he General flan is die "constitution"for the City The"constitution"contains the ati7en's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies These policies are then udhicd to help guide decisions for the next 20 years Your comments and participation arc vital to the success ol'this document If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments,please uulvc the following schedule(See reverse side for more inf(rrnatlou) Study Session 41 Study Session a3 field February 26,1996 5:00 P.M. April 8,1996 Rcvicw%larch 25, 1996,actions Study Session 02 Circulation Dement held March 11,1996 •.-I.and Use Element :-Land Use Map PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 5:00 P.M. March 25,1996 PUBLIC IWARING NO.2 v O.crview• 5:00 P.M. April 22,1996 }Public I fearing Procedure -.-Introduction ti•Envitonrnental Impact Report -.-Public I]caring I'mcedure -:Air Quality Llenient -*-Circulation F3cmcnt •:Nolsc Element -el.and Use Llcmeot •:Environmental Ila7ards Element •iLand Use Map •:I faiardous Materials Element e Utilitics Element I inal Study Session ff l •:Utb;m Design Element 4:00 P.AI. Nlav 6,1996 •iRecreation and Community Services Element :Rcviecs April 77. 1996,actions •'rHtstonc and Cultural Resources Element -*-Outstanding ISCUCS •:•Public Facilities and Public Services Element •:-f c%icw final action of the F-IR •:Environmental Resources and Conservation •:Rcvncw final action on(icncial Plan Element B eHousing Klement FINAL PUBLIC](FARING NO.3 Growth Management Gcrnent 5:00 P.M. May 13,1996 •:•Coastal F7ement •:bnttoduction licononic Development Element :Public I Iearing 1'rncedute Final acti0r,0n Uutstanchng Iscrics :•hinal Action on the Circulation Element :-Final action on the 1 and Use Map -*Final Action on the Land Use Elcmcnt -}Final action on the FIR •:Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC 11EARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All I'iIblie I learings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those Issues you 01 in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing desCfrb Cll located at 2000 Main Street,I lumington Beach,CA in thi-•••nice,or in written correspondence dch%Bred 92648 The Public Hearings will be held in the to the c ity at,or prior to the public heannc IC there l City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any turther questions,please call(tic Dcpartruutt I be held in Room 13-8,both located in the lower level of Community Development at 5 3b-5'71 ;utd rel"r of the Cisic Center to the above items Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note due to the amount of information,anv or all ofthe public hearings may be continued to Conme Brockway,City(•fork alternate dates In addition,scheduled topics and Regarding the General flan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates To C•ny off luntington Beach confirm the topic,time,and date,please contact 2000 Main Strcet,2nd Iloot either the Department of Community Development I luntington Beach,CA 926-18 .11 C7 i.n See-t??10r the Office of the Cho('Ierk at (714)`:6-S 17 \I.l-INTLRESTGD PFRSONS are invited to All public hearings will be tele%iced li%a on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit I Ili IT Channel 3 evidence for or against the General('fan update and - -- -- Lnvironntcntal Impact Report II'vou challenge the City Council's action in court,you NOTHT IS I IFREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment lit the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act It w-its determined that the contptchensive Gencral Plan Update would have a significant cm'iroemental effect and,thercfore,an 1 I nvitonnncnial Impact Report was warranted environmental Impact Report No 94-1 "ill also be considered by the City Cuuncif and is on life at the City off(lmtington Beach Community Developmem Department and the 011ice of the City Clerk,2000 Main Strcet,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Contnamity Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271 In conjunction with I m ironnnental Innpact Report No 9.1-1.the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement ofOvcrridmg Considerations Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts Ifadopted,the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan The Starement of Overriding Considerations identities significant adverse rrnpacl.that cannot be I avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Gnviron ment•d Impact Report and General flan The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable ad%enc impacts in the ttansporl.ufon and circulation,air quality,and noitic envitunn,ent.J ismtc areas I'LEASE BE ADVISIiD that upon final adoption by the City Council,the ponions of the General Plan tha:atc• within the coastal Tune must he cenilied by the California Coastal Commission the certification process ,sill begin wish a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Contntissnnn for rcx icw•and approval The submittal and approval may occur approximately six momhs to one year allcr Cih Council adoption • k PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: March 14, 1996 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 14 , 1996 at Costa Mesa, California. At ZZ� Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: March 14, 1996 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 14 , 1996 at Costa Mesa, California. Signature �'� EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 60. Southeast corner Planned CG- Fl CG Change from Planned Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: of Adams Ave. Community (Commercial (Commercial Community to with GPAC: recommend recommend to designate as & Beach Blvd. General, General) Commercial General designation as Mixed Use Mixed Use and add Specific (Seabridge Density 0.35 and add Specific Plan Plan (Straw Vote 6-0) Specific Plan FAR) area) (DM 13) 61. South of Orange RM. P(CN- 1) RMH - A Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Ave. between (Residential Public- (Residential designation to reflect with GPAC: add Public recommend retain IQth St. & 11th Medium underlying Medium High school/church, change (P) designation to Residential Medium High St. Density) Commercial Density, from Residential Residential Medium High density and add Public (P) Neighborhoo Small Lot Medium Density to (25 du/ac) Density to designation(Straw Vote 7- (DM 12) d,Density Subdistrict) Commercial provide consistency 0) 0.35 FAR; Neighborhood and between Zoning and P (RL-22) Residential Low General Plan Public- Density underlying Residential Low Density, 22 un/ac 62. Northwest Mixed RMH- 25- D CG/RMH- A Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of Acacia Development (Residential (Commercial Development to with GPAC: change to recommend change to Ave. & Main St. Medium High General/ Residential Medium Mixed Use Horizontal- Mixed Use Horizontal Density, 25 Residential High Density F1 (FAR 0.35) - 25 du/ac (MH-Fl-25) designation (DM 12) un/ac, Design Medium High to reflect existing (Straw Vote 7-0) Overlay) Density, conditions and uses Small Lot Subdistrict) Approved as of December 12, 1995 18 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 63. Northwest RM CN - Fl - D CG Change from Agree with PC& GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of 17th (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium provides consistency recommend change to St. & Olive Ave. Medium Neighborhoo General) Density to between Zoning and Commercial Neighborhood Density) d, Density Commercial General Plan , modify (CN-Fl) designation (DM 10) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood to boundary line on map (Straw Vote 6-0) Design reflect existing Overlay) conditions and uses 64. Northwest RM CN - Fl - D CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium with GPAC: add Public recommend change to Orange Ave. & Medium Neighborhoo General) Density to (P) designation to Residential Medium High 17th St. (Roger's Density) d, Density Commercial Residential Medium High Density 25 du/ac and add Senior Center) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood Density (25 du/ac)to Public (P) designation Design reflect Senior Center and (Straw Vote 6-0) NOTE: (DM 10) Overlay) city owned land inconsistent with zoning 65. Northeast corner OP(Office MV- F8-SP CO- 0 Change from Office Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: of Yorktown Professional) (Mixed Use (Commercial Professional to Mixed with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing Ave. & Main St. Vertical, Office, Oil Use Commercial Office Commercial Office(CO- Density 1.5 Overlay) (Commercial/Residen designation F2) designation and (DM 2) FAR [MU], tial) remove Specific Plan 0.35 FAR [C], (Straw Vote 6-0) 25 du/ac) 66. South side of P, P- Q, I, RL -6-5 RL -01 Change from Public, Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Yorktown Ave. (Public, (Residential (Residential Quasi-Public, with GPAC: add Public recommend change to between Golden Quasi - Low Density, Low Density, Institutional to (P) designation to Residential Low Density West St. & Main Public, 6.5 du/ac) Oil Overlay) Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 un/ac and add Public St. Institutional) Density and retain maximum 7.0 (P) designation (Straw un/ac Vote 7-0) (DM 2) Approved as of December 12, 1995 19 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 67. Northeast corner RM RL -6-5 RL Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of 17th St. & (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium provides consistency recommend change to Huntington Ave. Medium Low Density, Low Density) Density to Residential between Zoning and Residential Low Density Density) 6.5 du/ac) Low Density, General Plan, retain 7.0 7.0 du/ac (Straw Vote 7-0) (DM 2) decrease in density un/ac from 15 to 6.5 du/ac 68. Northwest RM I=- F2—SD Holly Seseliff age from Agree with CPAC; Deleted; change to General corner o (Ressidentin! (Industrin'5 Speeifiie-Plan Plan designation has been Crystal & Medium Density-0.5 (Industrial/W previously approved Clay Ave. Density) FARE Spec +c --) (DA4 2) 69. Southeast corner RM P(RM- 15) Holly Seacliff Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: of Crystal St. & (Residential Public - Specific Plan designation to with GPAC: do not add recommend retain existing Garfield Ave. Medium underlying (Residential Residential Medium Public (P), retain existing Residential Medium Density) Residential Medium Density (YMCA) Residential Medium Density 15 du/ac and add (DM 2) Medium Density/IV- Density designation and Specific Plan(SP) Density 15 1) add Specific Plan (SP) designation (Straw Vote 7- du/ac 0) 70. Northwest IG RM- 15 IG/IL Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of (Industrial (Residential (Industrial Industrial General to with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing Huntington St. General) Medium GeneralJ Residential Medium change to Residential Industrial (IG-F2) & Clay Ave. Density 15 Industrial Density Medium Density, retain designation (Straw Vote 7- (Cambro site) du/ac) Limited) existing Industrial 0) designation (DM 2) Approved as of December 12, 1995 20 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION' STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS 11 DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 11 71. Southeast corner Mixed P(MH- F3- Pacifica Add Public(P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: of Delaware Development 30- SP) Community designation with with GPAC: change to recommend change to Ave. & Main St. Public Plan Mixed Use Mixed Use and add Mixed Use, add Specific underlying (Commercial/Resident Specific Plan; modify Plan (SP) designation and (DM 39) Mixed Use ial) designation to boundary line on the modify boundary line on Horizontal, reflect existing map to reflect existing map to reflect existing area Density 1.0 conditions and uses area (Straw Vote 6-0-1 abstain) FAR, 30 un/ac, Specific Plan 72. Southeast corner Mixed CG - F2- D CO Change from Mixed Disagree with PC & Disagree with Staff and of Main St. & Development (Commercial (Commercial Development to GPAC: maintain density GPAC: recommend change Florida Ave. General, Office) Commercial Office at 25 du/ac and change to Mixed Use Horizontal, Density 0.5 to Mixed Use decrease density from 25 to (DM 39) FAR, Design Horizontal, F2 [FAR 15 du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0-1 Overlay) 0.51, 25 un/ac, Design abstain) NOTE: Overlay inconsistent with zoning 73. North side of RL P(RL -6.5) RL Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: Garfield Ave., (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC: correct location recommend retain existing east of Gregory Low underlying Low Density) Residential Low on map,retain Residential Low Density Lane. Density) Residential Density to identify maximum 7.0 du/ac 7.0 du/ac, add Public (P) Low Density church/school designation and correct (DM 40) 6.5 du/ac location on map (Straw Vote 7-0 74. Northwest RM P(RMH - 25) RMH Add Public (P) Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& corner of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to reduction in density GPAC: recommend retain Modale Dr. & Medium underlying Medium High Residential Medium from 25 to 15 du/ac, existing Residential Chapel Lane Density) Residential Density) High Density to agree with GPAC: Medium Density 15 du/ac Medium High identify church/school, provides consistency and add Public (P) (DM 40) Density 25 increase in density between Zoning and designation NOTE: du/ac from 15 to 25 du/ac General Plan, correct inconsistent with Zoning location on ma Straw Vote 7-0 Approved as of December 12, 1995 21 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY FXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. [_ LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DFSIGNATION DF,SIGNATION 75. North side of OS-R CV- FI CF-C - CZ Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Warner Ave., (Open Space (Commercial (Community Space Recreation to with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing 100' northwest - Recreation) Visitor, Facilities, Commercial Visitor existing Open Space Open Space Recreation and of Warner Ave. Density 0.35 Civic Uses, Recreation and add add Public (P) designation & Pacific Coast FAR) Coastal Zone) Public(P) designation (Straw Vote 7-0) Highway (DM 35) 76. North side of RM RL -6.5 R1 - CZ Change from Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: Warner Ave., (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium GPAC: provides recommend change to 500' northwest Medium Low Density Low Density, Density to Residential consistency between Residential Low Density of Warner Ave. Density) 6.5 du/ac) Coastal Zone) Low Density Zoning and General 7.0 du/ac (Straw Vote 7-0) & Pacific Coast Plan, decrease in density Highway from 15 to 7 un/ac (retain maximum 7.0 (DM 34&35) un/ac) 77. Huntington Mixed Use RM- 15, CR Huntington Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Harbour Bay - F1 - SP Harbour Bay Use to Residential with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing Club Specific (Residential Club Specific Medium Density and Mixed Use designation Mixed Use and add Specific Plan Medium Plan Commercial Regional and add Specific Plan to Plan (SP) designation Density 15 reflect existing (Straw Vote 7-0) (DM 34) du/ac, conditions and uses Commercial Regional, Density 0.35 FAR, Specific Plan) Approved as of December 12, 1995 22 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN I COMA4ITTEE ZO ING DISCliSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 78. Southern OS-R(Open RL - 6.5 RL-FP2 Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: termination of Space- (Residential (Residential Space Recreation to with GPAC: no change recommend retain Open Bolsa Chica St. Recreation) Low Density Low Density, Residential Low to existing Open Space Space designation (Straw 6.5 du/ac) Floodplain) Density designation Vote 4-3) NOTE: new (DM 33) RA-CZ designation is Open Space- (Residential Park(OS-P) Agriculture, Coastal Zone 79. Meadowlark Planned CG, RM- 15, Meadowlark Change from Planned Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Specific Plan Community RL -6.5 Specific Plan Community to with GPAC: change to recommend change to area (Commercial Commercial General, Mixed Use designation Mixed Use and add Specific General, Residential Medium and add Specific Plan Plan(SP) designation (DM 24) Residential Density and (Straw Vote 7-0) Medium Residential Low Density 15 Density du/ac, Residential Low Density 6.5 du/ac 80. Southwest IG P(I) Public - IL (Industrial Add Public (P) Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of (Industrial underlying Limited) designation to with GPAC: church is recommend retain existing McFadden Ave. General) Industrial Industrial designation temporary use, delete Industrial (I-F2) & Product Lane to identify Public (P) designation designation (Straw Vote 7- church/school and retain Industrial 0) (DM 18) designation 81. Area bounded Residential RL -6.5 Ellis Golden Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: by Ellis Ave., Estate; 3 (Residential West Specific Residential Low with GPAC: modify recommend retain existing Garfield Ave., du/ac Low Density Plan Density 3 un/ac to designation to Residential Estate 3 du/ac Edwards St., 6.5 du/ac) Residential Low Residential Low Density (Straw Vote 7-0) Golden West St. Density 6.5 du/ac 3 uu/ac (DM 38) (increase in density) Approved as of December 12, 1995 23 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 82. Northwest of Residential RL - 6.5 Holly Seacliff Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Edwards Ave. & Estate; 4 (Residential Specific Plan Residential Low with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing Garfield St. and du/ac and Low Density (Residential Density 4 un/ac to increase density, modify Residential Estate 4 du/ac northwest of Open Space- 6.5 du/ac) and Low Density, Residential Low designation to and Open Space-Park Seapoint St. & Recreation Open Space- 4 un/ac & Density 6.5 du/ac Residential Low Density designations (Straw Vote 7- Garfield Ave. Park Open Space) (increase in density) 4 un/ac, retain Open 0) and Open Space-Park Space-Park designation (DM 38 83. Southwest of IG CR- F2- D 1G (Industrial Change from Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: Gothard St. & (Industrial (Commercial General) Industrial General to GPAC: designate entire recommend change to Edinger Ave. General) Regional, Commercial Pedigo site as regional Commercial Regional (CR- Density 0.5 Regional commercial,expands F2-D) designation NOTE: (DM 26) FAR, Design commercial along inconsistent with zoning Overlay) Edinger corridor 84. Northeast of Mixed Use I - F2 - D 1L (Industrial Change from Mixed Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: railroad R.O.W. (Industrial, Limited) Use to Industrial to GPAC: provides recommend change to & McFadden Density 0.5 reflect existing consistency between Industrial (I-F2-D) Ave. FAR, Design conditions and uses Zoning and General designation (Straw Vote 7- Overlay) Plan 0) (DM 15 85. North Mixed Use CO- F4 North Change from Mixed Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Huntington (Commercial Huntington Use to Commercial with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing Center Specific Office, Center Specific Office to reflect Mixed Use and add Mixed Use and add Specific Plan area Density 1.25 Plan area existing conditions Specific Plan(SP) Plan (SP) designation FAR) and uses (Straw Vote 7-0) (DM 15 86. Northwest of Mixed Use CG - F1 Q-IL Change from Mixed Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Magnolia St. & (Commercial (Qualified, Use to Commercial with GPAC: change to recommend change to Warner Ave. @ General, Industrial General Industrial (I-FI), Industrial (I-F1) Riverbend Dr. Density 0.35 Limited) provides consistency designation (Straw Vote 7- FAR) between Zoning and 0) DM 27 General Plan Approved as of December 12, 1995 24 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE CONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 87. 1,000' Southeast CG RH -30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: of Garfield Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: eliminate recommend retain existing & Beach Blvd. General) High.Density. General) to Residential High residential node on Commercial General (CG- 30 un/ac) Density to create Beach Blvd., retain Fl) designation(Straw Vote (DM 1) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General designation 88. 1,000' Southwest CG RH- 30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: of Beach Blvd. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: eliminate recommend retain existing & Garfield Ave. General) High Density General) to Residential High residential node on Commercial General (CG- 30 un/ac) Density to create Beach Blvd., retain Fl) designation (Straw Vote (DM 2) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General designation 89 Northwest RL RL - 6.5 R1 - O - Change Residential Agree with PC,disagree Agree ee with Staff: corner of Palm (Residential (Residential CZ/RL Low Density from 7 with GPAC: designate as recommend change from Ave. & Island Low Low Density (Residential to 6.5 du/ac (Existing Open Space Park(OS-P) Residential to Open Space- Bay Ln. and Density) 6.5 du/ac) Low Density, Open Space Areas) Park(OS-P) designation southwest corner Oil Overlay, (Straw Vote 5-0) of Evening Hill Coastal Dr. & Shady Zone/Residenti Harbor Cir. al Low (Seacliff) Density) (DM 3) Approved as of December 12, 1995 25 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 90. Northeast corner 1) OS-C MH - F2- 1) RA - 0- Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff; of Beach Blvd. (Open 25- SP CC- CZ- Space Conservation, with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing &Pacific Coast Space- (Mixed Use FP2 Visitor Serving existing designations to designations to be Highway(White Conservatio Horizontal, (Residential Commercial and be consistent with the consistent with the zoning Hole Area) n; 2) VSC Density 0.5 Agriculture, Oil Residential Medium zoning recommendations recommendations made by (Visitor FAR, 25 Overlay, Density to Mixed made by the California the California Coastal (DM 14) Serving du/ac, Coastal Use Horizontal Coastal Commission and Commission(Straw Vote 7- Commercial) Specific Conservation, approved by the City 0) 3) & 4) RM Plan) Coastal Zone, Council (Residential Floodplain Medium 2) VSC- Density) CZ- FP2 Visitor Serving Commercial, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 3) MH- CZ- FP2 (Mobile home, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 4) MI -A- O- CZ- FP2 (Industrial Limited, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone, Floodplain) Approved as of Dcccmber 12, 1995 26 (g\cc1ndus1) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 91. Southeast of Mixed RMH - 30 North Change from Mixed Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: railroad R.O.W. Development (Residential Huntington Use to Residential with GPAC: change to recommend change to &405 Frwy Medium Center Specific Medium Density to Mixed Use and add Mixed Use and add Specific High Density Plan reflect existing Specific Plan Plan (SP) designation (DM 15) 30 du/ac) conditions and uses, (Straw Vote 7-0) add Specific Plan designation 92. Southwest RM P (RM- 15) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend retain existing Newland St. & Medium underlying Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Paseo Cir. Density) Residential Density) Density to identify Density designation Density 15 du/ac (SP) (between Slater Medium church/school designation (Straw Vote 7- & Talbert) Density 15 0) du/ac (DM 30) 93. Northwest Planning I -F2 - D MI -A- O- Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff, corner of Reserve (Industrial, CC- CZ- FP2 Planning Reserve to with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing Hamilton Ave. Density 0.5 (Industrial Industrial existing designations to designations to be and Newland St. FAR,Design Limited,Oil be consistent with the consistent with the zoning (Part of White Overlay) Overlay, zoning recommendations recommendations made by Hole area) Coastal made by the California the California Coastal Conservation, Coastal Commission and Commission(Straw Vote 7- (DM 14) Coastal Zone, approved by the City 0) Floodplain) Council Approved as of December 12, 1995 27 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL. ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 94. 1000' Southeast RL P (CG - Fl) CG/RA Change from Agree with PC & GP Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Magnolia St. (Residential Public - (Commercial Residential Low provides consistency recommend change to & Adams Ave. Low underlying General/ Density to between Zoning and Commercial General (CG- Density) Commercial Residential Commercial General General Plan Fl) and add Public (P) (DM 7) General, Agriculture) and add Public (P) designation (Straw Vote 7- Density 0.35 designation to reflect 0) NOTE: portion of site FAR existing (RA) inconsistent with Church/School zoning 95. South side of RL Western half PS (Public Semi Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Talbert Ave. (Residential - CG- F1 Public) Residential Low with GPAC: remove from recommend remove from 300' east of Low (Commercial Density to consideration as part of consideration and retain Beach Blvd. Density) General, Commercial General the General Plan update Residential Low Density (Crest View Density 0.35 on the west one half and retain existing and add Public designation School) FAR), of the site Residential Low Density (Straw Vote 5-2) NOTE: Eastern half designation on the entire designation is P(RL-7) (DM 40) - RL- 6.5 school site- add Public (Residential (P) designation Low Density 6.5 du/ac) 96. Northeast corner RL P (RL 6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Springdale St. (Residential Public - Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend retain existing and Heil'Ave. Low underlying identify Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Density) Residential school/church designation, maintain 7.0 7.0 du/ac and add Public (DM 25) Low Density du/ac (P) designation(Straw Vote 6.5 du/ac 7-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 28 (g\cclndusl) INDEX MAP UM 9 Dtj:I iI LEGEND DN, Is ~ :-MI? DM,22-D;S-.R!C7 M,-P 22 . DM, 2L-\ Jet 21 omt 23 :M24 DMZ` Dw,2r. Div..2 7 DM 54/DM 35 DN432 23; DtO 1 if DM 36\ DM 37 DM OD Ai DW,4 i DM3 2 Di �DM11 Dm-6 i f �, ! 1 /lr� DM tO I DMI I'm D I W.. DMS im W j 14 Dm-20 DM)9 CITY OF D HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORMA DM 29 DM 1 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council 87. CG (Commercial RH -30 (Residential CG(Commercial Commercial General (CG-Fl) General High Density 30 un/ac General GARFIELD AVE. --� J. I LL J _ _\�--_ __IIz 1 /JIB I_I C D. i [il Al �\ Cq i `!� •I IAI I ! IYi �c` — �Q. .s.lo. 1 XM CONBUq .5 — i I ED, ` Z : C CII,3 I} I `e aeon[ I ' s,oa_ J� I ICI ��I'' \ I i I I I I Y' I I I ! --L! j�1 ' I I L �Ogrtt OWw _ E. — �+ I i IW LP<E I q Dq. GVCM _ CqLd Rr1 et— _ 5 W+ CR COL�MiH q ;..__ -- I / ;1/�./.� //0'['L�N�Q• � �OFEVcq � q C T q Dq t L- I.. .� ZI ' I J — — I_ /• I i I J us LLucC F—;— --- �--/ o U' III I I �^"/`aaul III Dn M n0 i 1 1 I - -_.._ CLIPPER 3DR if- LARKCORT pt ID Cl I I I l I�f�I I� I l I 11 - T •p` I I cpcMS AVE- ` „I�z ......... �z�J, GOLDENWEST ST 1L 4�4 Ti STEWARF Si 0 IM :4 MAIN LRY-SIM A6 li II LA • 11 71 -T1 PAk. S, si— I LLY P..E MLF-1 LLL- 0 LAX[ $T j: HIM ILI Ufli ALAhAMA $i .... ... ... —7- oar A111, UMOO HF r-]coo. UTD.- MM M ED nuN 11-'TON ,n k 4 CA11FOR— sr 4-09 UJU DiLA.API $T rr-- "�JI�TI L Mfogm FM-M f k ORIDA LM —1 1 P",0 0 lam< M qp— J,9 li- BEACH BLVD (-J DM 2 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN DESIGNATION (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION ______by City Council 12. RM (Residential OS-P(Open Space-Park) RM-0 (Residential Medium Open Space-Park(OS-P) Medium Density) Density,Oil Overlay) 13. RM (Residential P(RM- 15)Public- RM(Residential Medium Public(P) Medium Density) underlying Residential Density) Medium Density 15 un/ac 14. RM (Residential P(RM- 15)Public- RM(Residential Medium Public(P) Medium Density) underlying Residential Density) Medium Density 15 un/ac 15. IG(Industrial P(1)Public-underlying IL(Industrial Limited) Public(P) General Industrial 43. RM(Residential RMH-25(Residential RM-RMH (Residential Residential Medium Density Medium Density) Medium High Density,25 Medium Density; Residential 15 du/ac un/ac) Medium High Density) 44. RM (Residential RH-30(Residential High RM-RMH(Residential Residential Medium Density Medium Density) Density,30 un/ac) Medium Density; Residential 15 du/ac Medium High Density) 45. RM(Residential CG-Fl (Commercial RM(Residential Medium Commercial General(CG- Medium Density) General,Density 0.35 FAR) Density) Fl 46. RM (Residential RH-30(Residential High RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) Density,30 un/ac) Density) 15 du/ac 47. RM (Residential P(RH-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential High Density) 15 du/ac and add Public(P) Density,30 un/ac 48. RM (Residential P(RH-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential High Density) 15 du/ac and add Public(P) Density,30 un/ac 49. RM (Residential P(RH-30)Public- RM (Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential High Density) 15 du/ac and add Public(P) Density,30 un/ac 65. OP(Office MV-F8-SP(Mixed Use CO-O(Commercial Office, Commercial Office(C042) Professional) Vertical,Density 1.5 FAR Oil Overlay) designation and remove [MU],0.35 FAR[C],25 Specific Plan du/ac 66. P,P-Q,I, RL-6-5(Residential Low RL-01 (Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 (Public,Quasi- Density,6.5 du/ac) Density,Oil Overlay) un/ac and add Public(P) Public, designation Institutional 67. RM(Residential RL-6-5 (Residential Low RL(Residential Low Density) Residential Low Density 7.0 Medium Density) Density,6.5 du/ac du/ac 69. RM (Residential P(RM- 15)Public- Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential (Residential Medium 15 du/ac and add Specific Medium Density 15 du/ac Density/IV-1) Plan SP 70. IG(Industrial RM- 15(Residential IG/IL(Industrial General/ Industrial (IG-F2) General) Medium Density 15 du/ac Industrial Limited 88. CG(Commercial RH-30 (Residential High CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG- General) Density 30 un/ac Fl DM 3 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by City Council 23. Industrial- MH - F1 -30 -SP M2 -O1 -CZ; Mixed-Use Horizontal; Resource (Mixed Use R4- O-CZ; Cl -O CZ(Industrial recommend F2-30 (.5 FAR,30 Production Horizontal, Density General,Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone; du/ac); recommend "average" 0.35 FAR,30 un/ac, Residential High Density,Oil density of 15 du/ac Specific Plan) Overlay,Coastal Zone; Commercial Neighborhood, Oil Overlay,Coastal Zone 89. RL(Residential RL-6.5 (Residential Rl -O-CZ/RL(Residential Logy Open Space-Park(OS-P) Low Density) Low Density 6.5 Density, Oil Overlay-,Coastal du/ac Zone/Residential Low Density) �— AV EpOE I I W W Q 1 J LAr I W", . fJ'� �� Z i "i I III o a v 4 \5 � .T ....•C I I •I ,�1 Q .... _-i-"Ij ..._- / 23 e" s Cio CS M' to • a �C l^q y DM 4 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING NO GENERAL ADVISORY COMMISSION PLAN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION (Designation to be considered by City Council) 23. Industrial- MH- F1 -30-SP M2-01 -CZ; R4-0-CZ; Cl -O CZ Mixed-Use Horizontal; Resource (Mixed Use (Industrial General,Oil Overlay,Coastal recommend F2-30(.5 FAR, Production Horizontal,Density Zone; Residential High Density,Oil 30 du/ac); recommend 0.35 FAR,30 un/ac, Overlav,Coastal Zone; Commercial "average"density of 15 Specific Plan) Neighborhood,Oil Overlay,Coastal du/ac Zone _ I i 1 .Jf .u+* +a io. 9C C SOL I I . i iC L I AM us �\ uu a , V) •Ia DM 5 No Land Use Changes USE OF PROPERTY MAP ML�, I 11, GARFIELD �1. YEJ DHUNTINGTON BEACH SANOA J OR L;—L'4-l'=-ill 4v OR In I OR pli T' Z. i i i 4 11E I 1 10 II ! ! i : lllllll III ililil I il I I LLLLLLLLl—� XANL-ELA 3,,N4,0 D- PIN PrIt H CF-E 31; YOP.K-,CwN AVE. Q II L i III !F7 ,7117I] ,=11 I KORRES--AL .0',IT0R OR j LI VALLEY FORGE C -E F T , alS—RK OR I OR OR II ,/ / I III II II z MAURETANIA.CR �A Y C m 0 0 Im ADAMS AVENUE DM 6 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION by City Council S. RL(Residential CN- F1 (Commercial Q-CG- FP2 (Qualified, Commercial Neighborhood Low Density) Neighborhood, Density Commercial General, (CN-FI) 0.35 FAR) Flood lain) 55. RL(Residential RM - 15(Residential RMP(Residential Residential Low Density 7.0 Low Density) Medium Density, 15 Manufactured Home Park) du/ac designation and add un/ac) Mobile Home Overly 36. CG(Commercial RM- 15 (Residential CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG-I<I) General) Medium Density, 15 designation un/ac OwQf P GORFIELD I , I ( .I li .I I I I I II I T) aL3ACORf OR � \ j o H ---' G L.-i IZI----�5 ; BASS OR V 1 g _ N EL C. c� iri i I I ! r •J� ..�� v�aR00 OR KLAa00 OR. N �_T I Imo—ITT'—I a. / KREDR OR _ FLOVNOEr1 GR CF—EI I l,—J I z� I I_ RORRET OR j—J 'l - OR 1 I_ BL.W SAILFISH --_- R n IL_ ! 1 i f tr I caAnp —7� pa i -I -ORTS.OUTY OR ;' I3�I �iF—E E- -- �- f \ CF-R I.I ia: 41 i _ `3 araR Nis .0R7 OA I i `.auew c. Io, c..lnrVna+ o. OR C- E C00 F_a C F—E .. I _ -:.1 jRCrpR rytJ aro�Lc. a. ;-v'/i I I I II I II L�JI I r I� GETTYSBURG ORNe cc � 77��� - j I — �r ADAMS AVE \ A a — rI, i l DM 7 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION (Designation to be considered by City Council) 52. RL(Residential CN -F1 (Commercial CG(Commercial Residential Low Density 7.0 Low Density) Neighborhood,FAR 0.35) General) du/ac,requested Historic Report to add Historic Overlav 94. RL(Residential P (CG- F1) Public- CG/RA(Commercial Commercial General(CG-F1) Low Density) underlying Commercial General/ and add Public(P)designation General,Densit •0.35 FAR Residential Agriculture) ;--7 �7_; �_ ME(7iTERP.pN[?N �N O NyJTiIUS OrE I ~ I .rot Ca..C. a I li li 1. I�''��—' jsN I I - 3_--; ✓y'G� I _ '._ —I`-I -' _ �ff L�1Nkk��y4�.��� _ CF-R o...c -aZE'lea^. III I ! r 1 - f I— � � iF----�--' I a.. _I,ao+ I c.i ?�aC� � 11 i � 'vl •� .__ i 1 r)=f,r.cox. — I sae[-c• _-- � ��I �'�--; --- -- s.�xE CF-E s,.,c:. al � I Q LJ � �� � .ccoc•[z'I l ..+ncan. w � i�l I s; I L J .a.o c.• g J' — T �— I�I^-� III I 1 J — _.y •'�_ - �r� ` r �=�—� --- --,L_' ems '--� f7 ?T'�--I J 7 --— — �—arm---_._�_,- -r--; �• i�I ! I scoTsro— �r a I TT /.� ATLANTA AVE. �\ �„iJ. DM 8 No Land Use Changes Ce ele AOAMS _ AVENUE J1 l / , rcn•, u i"� r I I �it17 &RCMWQOD RAIL-T I I li I - J CF-E R CF-R _af-•_�5; � I 1L� � Q �t � HEI �� li % N i c I f- 7 le ATLANTA AVE --r e DM 9 No Land Use Changes WESTMINSTER rc.. C J / AVE U.�� luuu N I /• N I 9 j Sr I ` � L m x � I f O / 'rd•' w • DR aiTT I II I 111 1 1 Dip 4 g S� ^winooc DRY it j 1 SanD3 M I San JUC, CR. 9 I j A Ill l i C F-E fR ♦U�``•a, I I i I 1 I T .. p� /P .1 J S •e ................ , 1 V_ S V a N 07 9: BOLSA nvE DM 10 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION (Designation to be considered by City Council 63. RM(Residential CN-F1 - D (Commercial CG(Commercial Commercial Neighborhood (CN-FI) Medium Density) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 General) FAR,Design Overlay) 64. RM (Residential CN-F1 -D (Commercial CG(Commercial Residential Medium High Density 25 Medium Density) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 General) du/ac and add Public (P) FAR,Design Overlay) zo A'o , b , r 1 Go 0 `off '° •.`•, +bra � y�_ •.;'` •�'•. :`4�r 4 \ 4 >W6 1 t r `r .%��• ``,ter `•��'rti�'' f ` c� 4� DM 11 No Land Use Changes I WESTMINST�=! AVE J I I L T-1 n, ER I _ —_-- `� Su SO wALr T w E w w.L Z AnOI•N .vE Z ' a i ;r A„ACAPA DP - C,F-E o a o ::s � G �0 C.y -__ - -- .�-Ia VI I I S =rE 11I �_, _ ��- I ICI` ! I I _ _ri+__, I < __QI <r_____ _ ?I i�I — C. � = I J � I po-, - - CF-E CF-E ' v�•ihG _ 1 I •-E ' 1 CF—R L IWl I MAP '.I5-.] DP W l0 Z � _� �i! +.✓^ I .. �..�___ :F] �~ _1 O O C C D i 7 7 r „ BOLSA AvE f D _ 3nv Z`—C_• N] 0 .7 < \ lu H HE o 002-H M ON] HP DE R7, F-10 On M HHo - \ o -- � DOE] YJ .• 8' 3ne •� i- F�j-_ -_ 1F7-7-1 3nv _- — -Cl. CF _ x 0—Marx 3nr M BF ELI f-'1r1 fl i� 3nv Swvov lf� ZI W(l DM 12 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN DESIGNATION (Designation to be DESIGNATION considered by City Council 9. RM(Residential OS-P(Open Space-Park) OS-PR-FP2 (Open Space, Open Space-Park(OS-P) Medium Density) Parks and Recreation, Flood lain 11. RM (Residential CN-F1 -D (Commercial CG (Commercial General) Commercial Neighborhood Medium Density) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 (CN-F1-D) FAR,Design Overlay) 58. CG (Commercial RMH-25 (Residential Medium CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG- General) High Density,25 un/ac Fl 61. RM (Residential P(CN- 1)Public-underlying RMH-A(Residential Residential Medium High Medium Density) Commercial Neighborhood, Medium High Density, density and add Public(P) Density 0.35 FAR; Small Lot Subdistrict) P(RL-22)Public-underlying Residential Low Density, 22 un/ae 62. Mixed RMH-25-D (Residential CG/RMH-A(Commercial Mixed Use Horizontal (MH- Development Medium High Density,25 General/ F1-25) un/ac,Design Overlay) Residential Medium High Density,Small Lot Subdistrict DM 13 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council) 3. RL(Residential CN - F1 (Commercial CG (Commercial Commercial Neighborhood (CN- Low Density Neighborhood, Density 0.35 FAR) General) F1 6. RL(Residential CN - F1 (Commercial CG - FP2 Commercial Neighborhood (CN- Low Density) Neighborhood, Density 0.35 FAR) (Commercial General, 171) Flood lain) 60. Planned CG- Fl (Commercial General, CG (Commercial Mixed Use and add Specific Plan Community Density 0.35 FAR) General) Overlay l ADAMS AVE I L .00 I_-E• - ��� •I.I-L..I I.. L,I,i I I I , _ / ¢,—,1.,—3� h 7 c4 •� i�: ! _ .gym. _. -�R.. �. _ .'t o I I I I I I _ .a I _ o. •;i i"S` .I—rl '_ c%[ •[E I I I �-^--�-�IIyS`- I 11 H �.. I:, lam.wa3`c• I�Q J a . ..[IL:. a. " 'ire, SJ• -CF_-R ! .17 ri I� I I I iy I. �I a '� •,t,4{ I I � I IIII I CF-L II�•.•-ETrS�-:.a� I f -r� I=-5 '� � �I:�a I 9 � I' , j 1 1� - "•<:c � I ! 1_�"Jam/ _ �i�i : �i�l• ��•� IIIII � ! ! I 1 n � I Ilil �z 1 MUMSTEN ' OR C. — J{ IIiII g i ! I ! ! ! il ! I 1I HF CF-R < 7v 3 1 I s 1 l l l Jf -ALLOY DR 1 z 1 I I V 1 I I I 1 1 I - I I I I c.. c.o n. o u•• x J 5S IIII ! ! I II IIII ! Illli ' Ill i I I I11 ' IIII \ �� ! II INDIANAAOLIS = v 7 I I I I I I ! IIII I / •`�', •'? J 4 ' i '"r•' <'�:'•� ' Ll CF-E s.l q [ „— wERON Cot _ °u CL NE - I o I I I I I I >i -•-^�" jL CRVv • Z ICI ji I � I ! � - II z o lill I � 44 -• u I I I I I i u I i __ .. -•- [.7 � •! ! z I • 'I wI I I III E -.:�;- '.!\ '. w mw a..0.mn0 'I'—,1I��I,1I�1�\�1 `1�1I 71 1Ll',�t I•. !� r •`:;,� _,• .• ::`_•_ � L_. .;.v r ATEANTA AVE 'OPM l4- S5E AlCAG4iEt) F@ 3 ATLANTA AVE I;L M 'IT I T —A ...... . ..... CF-E EL7 TD, 1.7 CF-R WV lj � 3 cc R 0 TA " ,5q 0 ,oqM U D EO-SON co PACTIC OCEAN ol T-� 40 00 +\ DM 14 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council 4. RL(Residential Low P(RL-6.5)Public- RL(Residential Low Public(P)designation; retain Density) underlying Low Density Density) maximum 7.0 du/ac Residential,6.5 un/ac 5. Recreation P(Public) RA-RL(Residential Public(P) designation to identify Agriculture,Residential utility right of way Low Density) 54. RM (Residential RL-6.5/1111-30 Magnolia Pacific Specific Residential Medium Density 15 Medium Density) (Residential Low Plan du/ac designation and add Specific Density,6.5 un/ac, Plan Overlay Residential High Density,30 un/ac 57. CG(Commercial RH-30 (Residential RH (Residential High Residential Medium Density 15 General) High Density,30 un/ac) Density) du/ac RM(Residential RH-30(Residential RH(Residential High Medium Density) High Density,30 un/ac) Density) 90. 1) OS-C(Open MH-F2-25-SP(Mixed 1) RA-0- Agree with Staff; recommend retain Space-Conservation; Use Horizontal,Density CC-CZ- existing designations as 2) VSC (Visitor 0.5 FAR,25 du/ac, FP2(Residential recommended by the California Serving Specific Plan) Agriculture,Oil Overlay, Coastal Commission Commercial) Coastal Conservation, 3) &4)RM Coastal Zone,Floodplain (Residential Medium 2) VSC-CZ-FP2 Density) Visitor Serving Commercial,Coastal Zone,Floodplain 3) MH-CZ-FP2 (Mobile home,Coastal Zone,Floodplain 4) M1 -A-O-CZ-FP2 (Industrial Limited,Oil Overlay,Coastal Zone, Floodplain) 93. Planning Reserve I-F2-D (Industrial, MI-A-O-CC-CZ_ Agree with Staff; recommend retain Density 0.5 FAR,Design FP2(Industrial Limited, existing designations as Overlay) Oil Overlay,Coastal recommended by the California Conservation,Coastal Coastal Commission Zone,Floodplain) TM 16 5E AZA666D BOLSA AVE O ,"J DR 1—cs, I- 7 T 7 c rn 61,-7 - C.7, 33Ft LA' e� c P E CF-E CENTER--- O L DM 15 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council 29. P,Q-P,I(Public, P(CG-Fl)Public- PS(Public Semi Commercial General(CG-F1)and add Quasi-Public, underlying Commercial Public) Public(P)designation Institutional) General,Density 0.35 FAR 32. CG(Commercial CR-F2-D CG(Commercial Commercial Regional(CR-F2-D) General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overlay) 33, P,Q-P,P(Public, MV-F8-D(Mixed Use RL(Residential Mixed Use Vertical(MV-F8-D) Quasi-Public, Vertical,Density 1.5 Low Density),IG Institutional)MD FAR[MU],0.35 FAR (General (Mixed [C],25 un/ac) Industrial),CG-H Development) (Commercial General-High Rise Overlay) 34. CG(Commercial MV-F9-SP(Mixed CG(Commercial Commercial Regional-FAR.5 Specific General) Use Vertical,Density 1.5 General) Plan (CR-F2 SP)) FAR[MU],0.5 FAR C ,25 un/ac 84. Mixed Use I-F2-D(Industrial, 1L(Industrial Industrial(I42-13) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Limited) Overlay 85. Mixed Use CO-F4(Commercial North Huntington Mixed Use and add Specific Plan(SP) Office,Density 1.25 Center Specific designation FAR) Plan area 91. Mixed Development RMH-30 (Residential North Huntington Mixed Use and add Specific Plan(SP) Medium High Density Center Specific designation 30 du/ac) Plan a o` yv�AX4 /i S:• aa�oo O 11� sr o . Y '� _.... Cn r, NUNfINGTGN N AVENUE �J 'q � '� •�j m BEACH BLVD. ;I: DM 17 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION by City Council) 22. CG (Commercial P (CN - Fl) Public-underlying CG (Commercial Public (P) General) Commercial Neighborhood, Density General) 0.35 FAR 26. RL(Residential P(RL-6.5)Public-underlying RL(Residential Public (P) designation; retain Logy Density) Residential Low Density 6.5 un/ac Low Density) maximum 7.0 du/ac 27. RL(Residential P (RL- 6.5) Public-underlying RL(Residential Public (P) designation; retain Low Density) Residential Logy Density 6.5 un/ac Logy Density) maximum 7.0 du/ac 28. RM (Residential CN - Fl (Commercial Neighborhood, CG (Commercial Commercial Neighborhood Medium Density) Density 0.35 FAR) General) (CN-F1 _ L-- - (N''',��T5mo. BE EFT 'COIER DR IT71 _Fl �i j 'T-�I_ �+�-�g' tl � I Y = z�J _ I ✓1 Twpn " I I I Imp IM�--L-P 3:! ALEXANDRIA D. s.`3 eNORIa DR . I I��><>, I Ta-E' LA � OYipRO I I , DR ��zl i i_i 1•i\i I I I I 1 z I I I � z_! I ' I i u, CF_E Ir RLRI5 [p 1 _ --. N✓1R V�RDCR I -_'� I i J NTERBURY'DR DR -CF-R uNr[aBURT DR ' l i l i 11 1 I I I I I N� DR ROME CR - CUMBERLAND DR CUMBERLAND DR 1 IIIIIi = = EIE�. 1I I 1= UGES C $01�NT0 C Ei R CF-E I DRCSDEN CR I-I I I I ! I R III III �{— i illill I ll 1 I �DR BROMN CR NALIFnY DR r ,� BRUNSwICF 0R Imo ~ I I \ I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I O III I' II FEE] IIi1i1111j F TT71TI I 1 CITADEL DR 4ELBOURNE DRy S;. ! DR I I I ; ; i Ili i � a I�-----�•--�J In I I rt Q —,I�u I DR z� ` I ,M( 0I�111g I" c F—+--1: $ CF'R >"o — MC FADDEN AVE I = (VANE CR J I u U J = = I I \ CF-R Iu • I I $ I �I I � I I I I I �--j�' J�' 1 � � 1 a. I i 1i I ,, _..-�I r--� I u OUNN DR cis;c Dq •� J wINS� I I I I I I i 1 � on ocs.0 ro I ♦NTRIN CR J/. I'--I^�^ I I STI I •I BI NI R C F E I Ro ILLTYRONE CD L' Y I N I DR I DR .00x r�of aLvw CR E CF- o SL140 ,CR 4E eTN'CR --� SN�NNON DR. wELDE CR y DR N,FGNE5 DR LI i CORK OR I RETNERFORD ! OR _ ` N 3 - l T I I I W J I I I CLILRE DR ; BR 7EELAND DR Q OY4L IS DR LONGFORD CR 11 I i 2 l0 I 3 I I ' u+No.a C I J OR. 0 CAVIUI 0: L N� CR ,F V ` i zb EDINGER r AVE DM 18 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council) 80. IG(Industrial P(I) Public-underlying IL(Industrial Industrial(I42) General Industrial Limited a • • o 80LSA I I AVE. J /� f I I i I H x�v,a oK ARCOSY Ta MA4 OR OR =I—"!AN —� RQAL z Mc FADDEN AV G .,. . CF-E n.1.5..t:P - -i L oCO —t DOVEw a o R -{ a Ij�l Ij I� a `L A414GO I LR BLUEJAY CR%--- -- j C^O55 _ _j U RG=4w000 OR 3 C F-E _ ! I W A Row OR CF R o SKYLARK OR l �.. 0 ;C -i C 0. O C F Cw. n EOINGER �- ' AVE. DM 19 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION DESIGNATION City Council) 51. CG(Commercial RM- 15 (Residential CG-FP2 (Commercial Commercial General (CG-F1) General) Medium Density, 15 General,Floodplain) un/ac _ AT L A N TA AVE. / � BAN N.NG PL L ; S % a �p•NN ST OaARE LL ST i Snrt cw �} / -iLSON ST � � Il / C•PITA� ST i % -E== C ST ....._. __ / / CONGRESS -- C OCvra.v OP ST Y O/' O 01 r a = MGMiL�ON Sr Q C'r. / 1C sr FT < O Z O I OOC--000 S r ,• �` C I T 1 OF CO S T • .r E S+ - >:r i 7 SrPIP ..> CiEr .. >:E'.1 .7P .3:•..- DM 20 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Council 2. RH (Residential P(RH -30) Public- RH(Residential High Residential Low with Public (P) High Density) underlying Residential Density) designation; decrease in density from High Density 30 un/ac 30 to 7 du/ac,P RL-7 50. RM (Residential CN - F1 (Commercial RM- FP2 (Residential Residential Medium Density(RM-15) Medium Density) Neighborhood, Density Medium Density, and Commercial Neighborhood(CN- 0.35 FAR) Flood lain FI ATLANTA AVENUE 111/ e i • N ••i"i--•-i•j'i'i" - —r-•r•i---i--i-;-�- \\ U.! a I I I I I I I I I I ��I"�o.;:,."-• 1 Tua .o I •I I I I I i CF-E _ o �I��'-II s� .,.o•e o. I 1 c-[s, - st r��I a- :I .. - .-• .... .--.-:`s[roa-. 1' I 'I I I •I I• 1 ! j \ ii�:t'!i•i6 Ca .. V CJiii 7T� i �-�_.31—_� 1 ;� ;•-4-�q-c. s,.Tr,u c•' I m .}- ?`— $ if-TT rl� Tc I L 4 1 r a AvE--A CRCR _ Ir N��I . � �' 4 11 I 1 II 11 I 11 --- r7— � I I I I ! ' ElK�«Gp♦ o 1 llq. s LILL Q Eqw a OR «UCSGN pq = ocl rc.trr o - _ V yz�H I I•i ,, ICF-, I a cc {, I . 1.. I 1 1 = 1 1 I I \ �F,R i I I -•�` I � %! 1 1 1 '•I H --- BANNING AVE t• • s to _:i IN aru� ela lair"I�r]F L111-1-1 1-1 — Nui \ 7 °tir r• 41 Ix UA Ir ui LJ ♦ 1 1 L O E o, 10 411 QK _ \ t i 1, �yez� r <'�`'i '• o�ot�'Jai+`OP 1 P� . J DM 22 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Council) 1 RL(Residential CN -F1 (Commercial CG-FP2 (Commercial Commercial Neighborhood (CN-Fl) Low Density) Neighborhood,Density General,Floodplain) 0.35 FAR 53. OS-C(Open RL-6.5(Residential Low LUD-CZ-FP2 (Limited Open Space Conservation(OS-C) Space- Density,6.5 un/ac) Use District,Coastal Conservation Zone,Flood lain BANNING AVE — s .tn.M ' .O�i ..0. C• D o J i ° � j 'T ,� %�,• J^mil � / ,�` � � I /• I I I i i ` I I Lu tD NI i ' • - ia/I A rli li I I ( ° oRr�vq aEcs i ■o - � / y y ° t ; ORANGE COUNTY ° 1 SANITATION TREATMENT / C PLANT CIA- ~ 1 / o C /yw Bf�Cy 1 ° f• �Q DM 23 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council) 19. RL(Residential RM - 15 (Residential RMP(Residential Residential Low Density 7.0 du/ac and Lo,tv Density) Medium Density 15 Manufactured add Mobile Home Park Overlay un/ac) Home Park —� EDINGER ovE I L •a c, i r zL \ �. PRELUDE OR L3 j _ iNuET Iw �? (��� - I � � I Jc �=I�r�''�'�j•J� M1VI CR' ' `r ✓``,Z w �J� // "'I J\ ... ..... J Reel SODT I ' I i _ DR \_ r�_i I�• 1♦�Po i ! u.+�.:_�[i.... IL I I I I , III A DR DR CF R I 1 1 d g rl i t ec I ARI l5 CN C I OR I C. 0 C C n I. • ; wL I .. •,,, .E pQ, U�STewa 8� I I j -off;;;.:_�• ! f � • I �� 1 �\\ \ �\1�. � I 1 ICF-R $s s SUR J BRGN�'OR ! i I \�\ oP \, /gel Z� -' ' ICF-R_ F\• Y'—igl � Ir�-- I PE.RCE S'' j \ I I I OLN DR ti TR\1M0�L \ 3 � wILO T DCVENRORT - 2 P Q��R: �/ I •�1� I 2 I Q r = 0 3 j � I`�i-mot DRwl m W4RNER nvE � ., o i DM 2 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN COMMITTEE DESIGNATION ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION (Designation to he considered by Citv Council) 20. RL(Residential P(RL-6.5) Public-underlying RL(Residential Public (P) designation; retain Low Density) Residential Low Density 6.5 un/ac) Low Density maximum 7.0 du/ac 21. SR(Senior RMH -25 (Residential Medium (Q) RMH Senior Residential to Residential Residential) High Density 25 un/ac) (Qualified, Medium High (RMH-25) Residential Medium High) 79. Planned CG,RM- 15,RL-6.5(Commercial Meadowlark Mixed Use and add Specific Plan Community General, Residential Medium Specific Plan (SP) designation Density 15 du/ac,Residential Low Density 6.5 du/ac J I I 1 1 C 1i ! IIII li ! I I I 11i1 I I it 7I •VORC• OR �EMRIC•SE+ DR CILSTL• K. I III III T i J 1 Y�MGNVLI Llr•DA CR < II q` � II11 I I CF-E ITTLEA AID W CLARX OR zi 13I3iOH I I I I I I I I I I IIII I ! � I ! I ' R 1 I PROPOSED O. C r C. O. 1 CF-E 1 1 ! I I I { III I 1 .r On YCADOIwLARS DR (LIE"C. -..A 2 2 — i 2 i 2 / VE•D� I 1 1 I 1 Yr%TURI OR V< I V I t I S I I I I I I I i f ---SMALL DR g 1 o m Q I I I I m I I III i � aL CAL-I OR u r10 Corr DR. illlllll I III IIIII IIIIIIII I I II Ilill III ' ! III _ I ! III ! IIII IiIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ„ IIIIIIIIII VEIL 3 AVE C + 5 > I lI1 � f I CR � I LLJ I l i I I ' � VI.I Dlrrewi I Pip CF- RLYN OR A 1Ow•102 CR. i GLORCO CR. I c• a _ U u —�_ nT�C•-l.�_ TROIMT OR. O N � - r WARNER AVE `�i n DM 25 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by Cite DESIGNATION Council) 96. RL(Residential P (RL 6.5) Public- RL(Residential Residential Low Density 7.0 du/ac and Low Density) underlying Residential Lo,.v Density) add Public (P) designation Low Density 6.5 du/ac � EJIhGER AvE. El Y I• .l I' I•I III I I ' I I .I� 1 ' I i I I II I I I III II ' I � I ; z sor—* De. a< . II I I I I = 1 '�' I I II I1 g I illl I ! ' w.zc0'O Da. E ,I 1 I I I I ! I I e DR, CF-E I ' -- ...-a., i t ! III III I I I I I = I = uYRTLE R — + I CF-R D� _ _ 1 •a 11 I ! III_ 1 1 j _ - c _r ED EL-0'/- DR. laa• a. `n_crr� .4:•'C E, Cyla-r DR s—E aR;Ro.-E eR III AVE. I I : III D- I ' II1 I •, I ' ' i � I � ' 1IIIIr 9 , II = ' 'I - - - C F—R 'JL ms,o. DR w .&Um DR. 1>�S Cast ws» J, ...._ _' ► 1 I FL — _ .t=[ — 1 wJl* F-E C DR •.. .- a . GG� CACF-R .OR III a ,DR a / RE lu ' e-R�,�--�� ' vl• Ex• DonE DR - ••Rlr.Eu• D, `IavnL• OR .DI• Da �.- DR.~ W 1 .7 I III i DR I Cu W 3 J O C r C D C....EL C)-) Q G — o = W G N 1 ' WARNER AYE. �•�J :. TM Z � EDINGER AVE J L " Jv 31 1: a B.JE StIlS DP ' '+ I I III ! a�-•I Iz vOL" Ja I .- � c I 57CNE w00D I I1IC�' I I I II �CF" i:i�� I�,I CF-R—I-- I IIII CAnDL._,�r Ea I a♦ P.Ds I I I— I -L I I .......� II l wON[ LN c r. - CF-E I IIII-,•♦ \ I IL r �\ -."•'Tt�--� I`-.":`.�'1 .._.-'.=�.-1 I' I 14DONALD av .ow Da I E INC DR.ri t� I I I:E ` I - 1 I I I I i I I !� _I 4 ♦ 1 I I{ ALNAMBRC 1 a - q. I "q L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~C• I I I y R � �J DawuB_ r �'"� tl -I�jC ��� I�I�'r r i l�J��: SEINE- a pl r_^ DON \ I - - 3t - I C F-E L . I � I� I � • ;\ NOtNYr001. I CF-R - - F N O C f C D O C a C D C6-I W Z 0 - o l..-•-- - -- i I � I � --I-„-'-III "=�-;�+--� i - WARNER AVE DM 26 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council 30. CG(Commercial CR-F2-D CG(Commercial Commercial Regional(CR-F2-D) General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overlay) 31. CG(Commercial CR-F2-D CG(Commercial Commercial Regional(CR-F2-D) General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overlay) 35. CG(Commercial MV-Flo-D-A CG-RMH-RM Mixed Use Vertical,decrease density General) RMH (Mixed Use Vertical, (Commercial from 25 to 15 du/ac (Residential Density 1.5 FAR[MU], General; Medium High 1.5 FAR[C],25 du/ac, Residential Density) RM Design Overlay,Auto Medium High (Residential Overlay) Density; Medium Density) Residential Medium Density) 36. CG (Commercial MV-F10-D-A CG-RM Mixed Use Vertical,decrease density General) RM (Mixed Use Vertical, (Commercial from 25 to 15 du/ac (Residential Density 1.5 FAR[MU], General; Medium Density) 1.5 FAR[C],25 du/ac, Residential Design Overlay,Auto Medium Density) Overlay) 38. RH (Residential P(RMH-25)Public- RMH (Residential Residential Medium High Density and High Density) underlying Residential Medium High add Public(P)designation,does decrease Medium High Density, Density) density from 35 to 25 du/ac 25 un/ac 83. IG(Industrial CR-F2- D 1G(Industrial Commercial Regional (CR-F2-D) General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overlay) DM 27 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council) 36. CG (Commercial MV- F10 - D -A(Mixed CG- RM (Commercial Mixed Use Vertical,decrease General) RM Use Vertical, Density 1.5 General; Residential density from 25 to 15 du/ac (Residential FAR IMU], 1.5 FAR IC], Medium Density) Medium Density) 25 du/ac, Design Overlay,Auto Overlay) 39. Mixed Use RMH -25 (Residential Q-RMH (Qualified, Residential Medium High Density Medium High Density, Residential Medium High 25 du/ae 25 un/ac) Density) 86. Mixed Use CG- F1 (Commercial Q-IL(Qualified, Industrial (I-F1 or F2) General,Density 0.35 Industrial Limited) FAR I � , ICJ 1 ` !, C•;' N 4 tARl AVE p `\ N.t L ' O O M f� C z - C, -'_ I -' or 1 I Z �. 1In1-1 I 1 J 7CN+L' Ca S.�pr •vE 1 v l��J'�J ; I I 1 •1 I I �_I 9 •-3 I ' UDT Ca •no a —J OE IILLE CR % �- 1 • li ! ! 11 Jill I I L...u--�- J i ...�• MITI { ili { { IIIII I i r I I I I I I I LINO. CR I R�,GL W II II ulC,, a -L-= L.NC.urEa DR .RNErr Da ..NETT Da EN c4 it � ' ,y - Q C. I� O C C D RENT CR ✓•I V , , C = V 1 F—rFE-- O -ERLE CR L.L.. ! <IIII�I ii��i�IlI---,,�III------Ilrr�I---,I,�II------II...I--�--,,III � OR um a � I 0. SGC Ca � I.. 1-0•r WARNER AVE DM 28 No Land Use Changes :s e�x. sees. — 0I s r >° c � J \fs � `r t � '1f SLR -'S G �y� y sc C r PACIFIC OCEAN _BFa�M 7 2• n >0 DM 29 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION DESIGNATION City Council) 53. OS-C RL-6.5 (Residential Low LUD-CZ- FP2 (Limited Use Open Space Conservation (OS-C) (Open Space- Density,6.5 un/ac) District,Coastal Zone, Conservation Flood lain \' L \ e � r yt T � 3 A, Nb C AI- Y{� 1 0 7� 1 DM 30 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Citv Council) 37. CG(Commercial MV- F10 - D (Mixed Use RM(Residential Medium Mixed Use Vertical,decrease General) RM Vertical, Densitv 1.5 FAR Density) density from 25 to 15 du/ac (Residential [MU1, 1.5 FAR [Cl,25 Medium Density) du/ac, Design Overlay 41. CG(Commercial RH -30 (Residential CG(Commercial General) Commercial General-FAR.35 General) High Density,30 un/ac CG-Fl 42. RM (Residential P(Public)-designation to CG(Commercial General) Public(P) Medium Density) reflect hospital 92. RM (Residential P(RM- 15) Public- RM (Residential Medium Residential Medium Density 15 Medium Density) underlying Residential Density) du/ac and add Specific Plan(SP) Medium Densitv 15 du/ac designation CIT. I O� _ roU�.T.�� �+LLe+ O I J <M$TERDAM DR I� II T RE 4ORCM0T DR , pa I I^� '—�•IILL�'I��—�'� I = J ' O MER$EILLE OR : u = POLDER CR �-- _ VlililllilJm Ii=iii ! Ili , v LE VC-< I i III it Iij I HFRI-$LINO I1 j 1 1 �DR' iili �a No I �- C I ` F-EI i 40� F If z j I —=--ice -- -- �ti — {I = —' - i -------------- -` — .1 IIv �. ` - I 1 Q I I TALBERT AVE 1J1V1 J 1 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council) 24. IG(Industrial RM- 15 (Residential 1G(Industrial General) Residential Low Density 7.0 du/ac General) Medium Density, 15 un/ac 25. IG(Industrial I- F2 -H (Industrial, IL(Industrial Limited) add Historic Overlay General) Densitv 0.5 FAR, Historical Overlay) 40. Commercial RM- 15(Residential OP(Office Professional) Commercial General- FAR.35(CG- General Medium Density) FI) 41. CG(Commercial RH-30 (Residential CG(Commercial Commercial General-FAR.35(CG- General) High Density,30 un/ac) General F1 r �± CF-E j o j - J CF-R m LLi � I i ! CF-E mTT7 DR Z CF-C 1 IAA D• I e = IF, ; . 1 w I 1 4 •[C4 I I 'F CF-R _ ...., Lt I ! lifllli ► i , ! � ! i' V NDD 3 I i :_-- T.�(_BE-7 AvE DM 32 No Land Use Changes WARNER AVE- Jy1 I 1 Lj L I � ---- I�= I mil l „ '��• - I I SN,.u.Jp�iC Ga if I i I •± I 1 � '1 I i 1 ' CF F CF-R \j_1' AOSE..Ow, I�I I Da _ I Do-.. c• ' _�•' �'--'I 1 / —l'�= �,o. tl 17 I I I I \ 'I D.LO c TO OR •, fit c. . 1-1 � C li ,I.,t.l so w. OR^ 1 I I 1 I 1 a1 �e ,uD.to `I ' am y ; I I I I ~ rolar Df LOu. ; o[ c J ,..e' t� 5 2 1 I I I i %k 1'l��1 LLJi S� I I I I I I i c:•. co.. Y s.•wo o. I I S II II I � II it I lI1 = II I . `f.0...p0 ear i1+ • c III 1 . II I Il �. jl ili 111 / � ; ! c.�su Y z w•c, •n.t• °' c l I a�J I I I I 1 1 ..0 c.� CF—E CF 1I �II--I' T�I �J CF-E I------ ----�, I t I I IN • . ' I �_I � +Y�l., Y Iy .•D�,tf Y II I.I I I I � �' I I Y� •P, D. i..•O.�[..Y I .... Kra ^ 'M W 1� Q E N I I I 1 111 111 TT 1 'r — -- i L -Im Y ..tt.. — C F_R 3 ,; s,= w.sri.D ., 1C I I I 7 i 7 3 uc[f•o � ``'� I I a • D. DM 33 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by City Council) 78. OS-R(Open RL-6.5 (Residential RL-FP2 (Residential Low Density, Open Space-Park(OS-P) Space- Low Density 6.5 du/ac) FloodpWn) RA-CZ(Residential Recreation) A riculture,Coastal Zone I- AVE } I I I t i / E�DORTDO DP r! \� IROGERS q N _� •I i ILJ-! r-i--i--�1 ,z�- mI-- I� �I I I,_ / L_i n -1 ..SF..:�u�\\y]♦� I �--; —1n —. L—I� 14 1 I I 11 0. 6 1 = GLENROT DRL< 3C mil'•.w o J \ 1 I+I —1, I a~•`� �!'✓ \ III 1 rK E�NIL—w—O RAT—y—' �7 Ig / CF- �— Cr \ ............. PR!CE DR ,- LOU-DES DR. RAPMAEL oac.n :.\?. '/ x/,�s \ r.�� •ram L ?� ---_ I I n OR �:' _ 71NON OR i _ J \• � � \ �' n TERRIER - —' OR 3 DR [TV Ix I 7. PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: March 4, 1996 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 4 , 199 6 at Costa Mesa, California. Signature P`JBLIC-N41TICES PUBLIC NOTICES PURL-NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL HUNTINGICIN.BEACH CITY OF HUN'TINGTON BEACII SUBJECT: LAND USE RECOMtMENDA'1'IONS O(''FIIE PliOIIOSED GENERAL PLAN-CITY OF HUNT'INGTON BEACH To Interested Parties: The City of Huntington Beach City Council is holding public hearings to discuss land use changes proposed in the comprehensive update of the General Plan. A General Plan land use designation may alter the future use and development of property in the City. Please review the attached table and map for proposed changes to the General Plan land use designation of your property or property in your area. If you would like to comment oil the proposed land use changes,you may either Submit a letter to the Office of the City Clerk and/or attend the scheduled City Council meetings. A General Plan is considered the"constitution"of the City and is a reflection of the citizen's desires and ambitions for the future of I luntington Beach.The General Plan is also used to guide the decisions of elected officials and City staff for the next 20 years. The existing General Plan was adopted in 1976 and has undergone incremental changes since that time. Due to changes in community needs, population demographics,laws,and development patterns,the General flan is being updated to reflect current conditions. The attached table and map provide a brief overview and location for proposed changes to the General Plan land use designations. The table describes the existing General Plan land use designation,General Plan Advisory Committee's recommended land use designation,the existing zoning designation,and the Planning Commission's recommended land use designations. The land use changes of the Draft General Plan will be presented at a City Council hearing tentatively scheduled for April 22, 1996,at 5.00 P.M. Final action on the General Plan and land use designations is tentatively scheduled for May 13, 1996. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk or the Department of Community Development to confirm these City Council meeting dates. City Council public hearings are held in the following location: City of Huntington Beach Civic Center Council Cambers,Lower Level 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 If you would like additional details on the proposed land use changes,a copy of the Draft General Plan may be purchased for$10.00 in the Department of Community Development. A copy of the Draft General Plan is available for review at the following locations: City of I luntingion Beach City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development Office of the City Clerk 2000 Main Street 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 (714)536-5271 (714)536-5227 City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach Central Library Banning Avenue Branch Library 7111 Talbert Avenue 9281 Banning Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach.CA 92648 (714)842-4481 (714)375_5005 . City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach Graham Street Branch Library Main Street Branch Library 15882 Graham Street 525 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach.CA 92648 (714)375-5006 (714)375-5071 If you have any questions about the General Plan update process,please contact the Department of Community Development at(714)536-5271. Sincerely, Melanie S.Fallon Director of Community Development Attachment ALL RTfERESTIM PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in count,you may be limited to raising only those issues You or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or Prior to the public hearing If there are any further questions,please call the Department of Community DcA,clopment at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Please direct your writen communication to the City Clerk: Connie Brockway,City Clerk Regarding the General Plan Update City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92648 (714)536-5227 Car:'-irued on next page UBLIC NOTICES Beach,CA 92649 sociation or savings VdniC IS:'21041 GREENBORO ' The fictitious business specified in Section 5102 LANE, HUNTINGTON PUBLIC NOTICE name referred to above of the Financial Code and BEACH,CA 92649. was filed in Orange County authorized to do business THE OWNERS OF STATEMENT OF on 07/26/94, File No. in this state. In the event RECORD ARE WILLIAM ABANDONMENT OF 616862 tender other than cash is AND TRACY HENDERSON. Physicians and Surgeons accepted, the Trustee may THE TITLE IS VESTED IN USE OF FICTITIOUS Laboratories, Inc., a Cali- withhold the Issuance of WILLIAM AND TRACY BUSINESS NAME fornia corporation, 15162 the Trustee's Deed until HENDERSON, HUSBAND The following persons Triton Lane, Huntington funds become available to AND WIFE AS JOINT TEN- ave abandoned the use of Beach,California 92649 the payee or endorsee as a ANTS. he Fictitious Business This business was con- matter of right. If the subject of this sale lame: Ergonomics Re- ducted by a corporation This is an attempt to col- is real property and it has earch, 18685 Main St.Ste. Physicians and Surgeons lect a debt and any infor. no street address or other 06, Huntington Beach,CA Laboratories, Inc. , /s/Vice mation obtained will be common designation, di- 2648 President used for that purpose. rections to It's location may the Fictitious Business 19963678118 Said sale will be made, be obtained from the Mar- lame referred to above This statement was filed but without covenant or shal's Office upon request. as filed in Orange County warranty, express or im- Prospective bidders n Oct. 31, 1995, File with the County Clerk of ty. P o.19953663163 Orange County on 3-11-96 Plied regarding title, pos- should refer to Sections ' andra Zapata, 9763 H.B. Independent April 4, session or encumbrances, 701.510 to 701.680, inclu- I ampton Court, Fountain 11,18,25,1996 041-314 to satisfy the indebtedness sive, of the Code of Civil I alley,CA 92708 secured by said Deed,ad. Procedure for provisions I ouglas Gastelum,35 Lin- PUBLIC NOTICE vanes thereunder, with in- governing the terms,condi- I an Ave., #406, Long terest as provided therein lions,and effect of the sale 1 each,CA 90803 YOU ARE IN DEFAULT and the unpaid principal of and the liability of default- I his business was con- UNDER A DEED OF the note secured by said ing bidders. I ucted by a general part- TRUST DATED 05/15/ deed with interest thereon NOTICE IS HEREBY ership 1992. UNLESS YOU as provided in said Note, GIVEN that on THURSDAY I andra Zapata TAKE ACTION TO PRO- tees, charges and ex- MAY 2, tR r 19983873084 penses of the trustee and o'clock A.M. at at WEE6, at OST OR- c TECT YOUR PROP- of the trusts created by ANGE COUNTY MARSHAL, r This statement was filed ERTY,IT MAY BE SOLD said Deed of Trust. 8141 13TH STREET,City of I ith,the County Clerk of AT PUBLIC SALE. IF IMPERIAL CREDIT WESTMINSTER, CA., range County on 2-13-96 YOU NEED AN EXPLA• INDUSTRIES, INC., AS County of Orange, State of B. Independent March NATION OF THE NA. TRUSTEE, BY: CON- California I will sell at pub- 4,21,28,April 4,1996. TORE OF THE PRO- SOLIDATED RECON• lic auction to the highest bidder, for cash in lawful 032-198 CEEDING AGAINST VEYANCE COMPANY, money of the United 1 PUBLIC NOTICE YOU, YOU SHOULD AS AGENT, 21031 States, all the right, title c CONTACT A LAWYER. VENTURA 'BLVD., and Interest of said judg- j STATEMENT OF TS#37866.04 FIFTH FLOOR, WOOD• ment debtor(s) in the ABANDONMENT OF NOTICE OF LAND HILLS, CA above described property, i USE OF FICTITIOUS TRUSTEE'S SALE 91364, (818) 340- or so muph thereof as may BUSINESS NAME UNDER DEED 4472 said necessary to satisfy The followingpersons said execution, with ac- I P OF TRUST Dated:03/12/1998 creed Interest and costs. c ave abandoned the use of Notice is hereby given N A N C Y VIGIL, Dated MARCH 22,1996 e Fictitious Business that IMPERIAL CREDIT IN- TRUSTEE SALE OF. Division: West Division, I ame:Java Garden,17304 DUSTRIES INC.,as trustee, FICER 8141 13th Street,Westmin- 1 each Blvd., Huntington or successor trustee, or LPP 14732 ster,Ca.92683 each,CA 92647 substituted trustee pursu- APPROXIMATE MINIMUM f he Fictitious Business ant to the Deed of Trust ex- Published Huntington BID$*. 1 flame referred to above ecuted by DENNIS M. DE- Beach-Fountain Valley In- *TRANSFER TAX IS 55 '1 was filed in Orange County VINE AND SUSAN CHAN- dependent March 21, 28, FOR EACH $500. OF THE r In 5-9-95,File No.F645949 DLER DEVINE, HUSBAND April 4,1996. PURCHASE PRICE. THIS Rosalind Jane Toben, AND WIFE AS JOINT TEN- 033-228 PROPERTY IS BEING I: 16541 Higgins Circle, Nun- ANTS and recorded on SOLD SUBJECT TO RIGHT r Ington Beach,CA 92647 May 22,1992 as Instrument PUBLIC NOTICE OF REDEMPTION (CCP Timothy Lee Mitchell, #92-346023 of Official 729.010). THE AP- c 6541 Higgins Circle, Hun- Records in the office of the JOHN S. WORDEN, PROXIMATE AMOUNT OF 't ngton Beach,CA 92647 County Recorder of OR- ONE MARKET PLAZA SECURED INDEBTEDNESS his business was con- ANGE County California, SPEAR ST., TWR. PLUS INTEREST AND !c ucted by co-partners and pursuant to the Notice 32ND FL. SAN FRAN- COSTS IS$43,458.84 osalind Jane Toben of Default and Election to Michael S.Carona 19983677820 Sell thereunder recorded .CISCO,CA 94105,415 I This statement was filed on November 20, 1995 as 896-0866 By: G. McAulill, Dep• , ith the County Clerk of Instrument #19950514221 SUPERIOR COURT OF uty of said Official Records, CALIFORNIA,L I F O R N I A 700 NOTE:Do not take down range County on 3-22-96. r .B. Independent March will Sell on 04/11/1996 at CIVIC CENTER DR., <or deface a posted notice 8,April 4,11,18,1996. 12:30 P.M.AT THE NORTH WEST, SANTA ANA, before the sale or satisfac- i FRONT ENTRANCE TO WE T, S tion of judgment. Penal 1 034-294 THE COUNTY COURT- Code Section 616 (misde- P HOUSE, 700 CIVIC CEN- PLAINTIFF:WAYNE K. PUBLIC NOTICE AKANA meanor). TER DRIVE WEST, SANTA STATEMENT O ANA, CA at public auction, DEFENDANT: WIL- Published Huntington F ; In- ABANDONMENT to the highest bidder for LIAM HENDERSON Beach-Fountain Valley In- ABANDO T F E USE NMENIO cash (payable at the time NOTICE OF dependent April 4, 11, 18, I BUSINESS NAME of sale In lawful money of - MARSHAL'S SALE 1996. 1 the United States),all right, 041-318 The following persons title,and Interest,conveyed LEVYING OFFICER ave abandoned the use of :to and now held by it FILE NO.: PUBLIC NOTICE e Fictitious Business under said Deed of Trust in WOCS741222-A ame: Stever & Alexander the property situated in COURT CASE NO.: SHELDON S. GOOD- r ssociates,3567 Windspun ;said County and State and 741222 MAN, 505 S. MAIN Qr., Huntington Beach, CA described as follows: By virtue of a writ issued -STREET, SUITE 720, ' 2649 AS MORE FULLY DE- on JANUARY 16, 1996 in ORANGE, CA 92668, t he Fictitious Business SCRIBED ON SAID DEED the above designated 714 550.0111 t dame referred to above OF TRUST Court,upon a judgment en- as filed in Orange County APN 936-29-232 tered 11-21-95 in favor of ORANGE COUNTY MU. . 9 n 3-1 8-9 3, . File ' TRUSTEE IS SELLING judgment creditor(s), WIL- N I C I P A L COURT/ r �lo.F564671 PROPERTY "AS IS, LIAM K.AKANA AND BEV- SOUTH. DIVISION, dward S. Stever, 3567 WHERE IS" ER LY K. AKANA and 23141 M O U L T O N E indspun Dr., Huntington The street address and against judgment debtor(s) PKWY., 2ND FL., LA- I c each,CA 92649 other common designation, WILLIAM AND TRACY GUNA HILLS, CA s1 Charles Scott Alexander, If any, of the real property HENDERSON showing a 92653 4 Skylark Dr., Ste. 12, described above is pur- :net balance of $41,862.08 PLAINTIFF: S U N- rkspur,CA 94939 ported to be: 16461 GER- actually due on said judg- SHINE VILLAGE his business was con- MAIN CIRCLE, HUNTING- ment on the date of the is- ucted by a general part- TON BEACH,CA 92649 suance of said writ, I have HOMES ASSOCIATION ership The undersigned Trustee .levied upon all right, title DEFENDANT: ELENA Edward S.Stever disclaims any liability for and Interest of said judg- ZAGUSTIN 19963676858 any Incorrectness of the ment debtor(s)in the prop- NOTICE OF This statement was filed street address and other :arty In the County of Or- MARSHAL'S SALE ith the County Clerk of common designation, if ange, State of California, LEVYING OFFICER range County on 3.18-96. . any,shown herein. described as follows: FILE NO.: H.B. Independent March . The total amount of the THE LEGAL DESCRIP- WSOC96675-A 8,April 4,11,18,1996. unpaid balance of the obli- TION OF THE PROPERTY I 034284 gation secured by the IS: THE REAL PROPERTY COURT CASE NO.: j property to be sold and IN THE CiTY OF HUNTING- ' 96675 PUBLIC NOTICE reasonable estimated TON BEACH, COUNTY OF By virtue of a writ issued costs, expenses and ad- .ORANGE,STATE OF CALI- on 2-13-96 in the above I cns1382291 vanes at the time of the FORNIA, LOCATED AT - designated Court, upon a initial publication of the No- ;21041 GREENBORO LANE, judgment entered 6-1-95 in STATEMENT OF tics of sale is:$235,647.60 'LOT 53 OF TRACT NO. favor of judgment credi- ' ABANDONMENT OF In addition t0 cash, the 6021 AS PER MAP RE- r tor(s), SU SHINE ViLLAGE > USE OF FICTITIOUS Trustee will accept a cash- :CORDED IN BOOK 262, ' HOMES ASSOCIATION and BUSINESS NAME ler's check drawn on a ' PAGES 24-26 OF MISCEL- against judgment debtor($) ! The following persons state or national bank, a LANEOUS MAPS, IN THE ' ELENA ZAGUSTIN showing Ii Have abandoned the use of' check drawn by a state or OFFICE OF THE COUNTY a net balance of$9,732.24 1 the Fictitious Business federal credit union or a RECORDER OF ORANGE : actually due on said judg- I c :Name: Physicians Refer- check drawn by a state or COUNTY. ment on the date of the Is- once Laboratory,15162 Tri- federal savings and loan THE COMMON DESCRIP- suance of said writ- ' :ion Lane, Huntington association, savings as- ITION OF THE PROPERTY levied upon F" PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTIM PUBM NOTI S PWLIC Continued from previous page EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING, PLANNING COMMISSION NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designations to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION I by the City Council 61, RM(Residential P(CN-11 Public- RMII-A(Residcmial Mediunt Residential Medium High Medium Density) underlying Commercial - t(igh Density,5111aR l.m - density and add Public(P) Neighborhood.Density 0.35 SldxlislriG) FAR''. P(RL-22)Public•Nd tiylag ItaeideMial ieay�ity,Nae62 Mucd -25-D'(Residential CG/RMH-A(Commercial ,Mixcd Usc 110d70mal(MH-F-1Development ium High Density,25 General 25) B. e,Design Overlay) Residential Medium High Densit,Small Lot Subdistricq_ 63 Rh4(Residential -FI-D(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Commercial Nciglitwrbood bleduun Density) hborhood.Density 0." (CN-Fp,Utensil ovcda) __6Y RM(Residential -FI-D W01111 rercial CO(Comnrcrciai General) Residential Mcdmm IbghMedium Ucnsty) hbuhood.Density 0.35 - Density 25 dNac and add Pubhc ,Desi n Ovcrla (1') I _65. OP(Once -Fit-SP(Mixed Use CO-O(Commercial Office,Oil Commercial OI we(CO-F2): 11#1 . . CProfessional) ical.Density 1 5 FAR -t)gcrlay) designation and rcmme specific),0.35 FAR ICI,25Planc - --'� C C n C p - 5 8 4 a z P,p-Q.1, RL-6-5(Residential Low RL-01(Residential Low - Residential Low Density/.a >z imp (Public,Quasi- Density.6.5 dui Dcnsit).Oil Ovcrlay) tin/ac and add Public(P) - - _I `-e g _ _ Public- dcsignalim - ..F -. r C. Insuutionad n Z = n7 ItM(Residential RL-6-5(Residential Low RL(Rcvidcnual Low Density) Residential Lou Dcnsih 7 0 v a^m p O= •o z= _a a z a �- E�� S^ Medium Density) Densiy'.6.5 du/ac) diilac re. r^a,$ c-= ' a n G9.- RM lResidential P(RM-IS)Public- Holly Scacliff Specific Plan Residential Medium Density IS o, - - = = p Medium Density) underlying Residcnbal (Residential Medium Density/lV du/ac and add Specific Plan(SP) a ;= =v- ,�, a° " C_ p C y O>Z i� Medum Density 15 dN4C __ 70 IG(budnsuial RM-I5 tlicsidcntia4. I(i/II Ilndustrial Gcncral Industrial(IG-F2)• $R,F. '^ A a n c ry= <c 2 X 5> ^ N Gcncral) Mcdmm Dcnst�l5 dWac) ludusuial Linnicd) - C n C1=n n0 y - 5- General) - Mixed P(Nil l-F3- R-SP)Public Pacili Conununn)flan Mixed Use,add Specific Plan = N r ?_^= ic Ucaclopmcnl •unnlcrh mg Mixcd Use (Sp) L c' a C 12 Honioulal.Deem)10 FAR, < _ 3Uui-SIX-fie Plan_ ' 72 Mixed CG•F2•D(Commercial CO(Commercial office) Mixed Use Ilarizmtah decrease a N ?n n Dnclopmem General.Densny 0.5 FAR, density from 25 to 15 dufac = =)I2 P ' Design lTcrlav) > 71 RL(Residential P(RI,-6 5)Pubhc- RL(Residential Low Dcnsitv)' Residential Low Ucnsny 7.0 $ n� n=O .,ii v C Low Density) underlying Residential Low - du/;ic,add Public(I J Density 6 5 do/ac 74 RM(Residential P(RMH-25)Public RMH(Residential Medium High Residential Mcdmm Dcnsit)15 Medium Density) underlying Residential Density) dulac and"add Public(P) C - ,o O' A c z Mcdium High Dcn iq'25 du/ac 75 OS-R CV-FI(Couunercial CF-C-CZ Open Space Recreation and add (Open Space- Visitor,Dcnsih 0 35 FAR) (Community Facilities,Civic Public(P)designation 3 _ Recreation) Uses,Coastal Zone $_'•A a s o 3n_ $�_a ,o 76 RM(Residential RL-6 5(Rcvdcmial l.mv R I-CZ(Residential Low Residential Low Dcnsity 7 0 ° �` x 1 Mcdtimn Dcnsit Dcnsit 6 5 dNac Dcnsit•.('costal Zonc) do/ac - cc" n 2 _ II vI _ z:g y a. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION � _" NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS - :"• n PLAN COMM I"F.F, (Designations to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the City Council) 77 Mixed Use RM-15.CR-FI-SP Huntington Harbour Day Club Mixed Use and add Specific (Residential Medium Density Specific Plan _ Plan(SP)designation 15 dui Commercial Regional.Densny 0 15 FAR, Specific Plan) 78 OS-It(Open RL-6.5(Residential Low RI,FP2(Residential Low Open Space-Park(OS-P) Space- Density 6.5 du/ac) Density,Floodplain)RA-CZ - Recreation) (Residential Agrieulluip. Coastal zone)_ 79 Planned CG RM-15.RI.-6.5 Meadowlark Specific Plan Mixed Usc and add Speei6c _ Community (Commercial General. _ Plan(Sp)designai ion Rcsitkntipl Mcdium tensity - 15 dui Residential Low _ Density 6.5 dulab ' 80. IG(Industrial P(1)Public-underlying IL(Industrial Limited) Industrial(1-172) General) Industrial 81 Residential RI,-6 5(Residential Low Ellis Golden Wes(Specific Plan Residential Estate 3 dNac Estate,3 dNac_ Density 6.5 du 82 Residential Estate; RL,6.5(Residential Low Holly scacliff specific Plan Residential Estate 4 du/ac and 4 do/ac and Open Density 6.5 du/ac)and Open (Residential Low Density,4 Open Spxe-Park designations Spam-Recreation I Space-Park uNae R,O n S ce ' 81 IG(Industrial CR-F2=D(Comniercial I G(industrial General) Commercial Regional(CR-F2- General) Regional.Density 0 5 FAR, D) Ucsi nOs crlav 84 Mixcd Use 142-D(Industrial, IL�Iadustrial Limited) Industrial(1-1;2-D) Density 6.5 FAR,Design Overlay 85 Mixed Use CO-F4(Commercial Once, North Huntington Center Mixed Use and add Specific Densit•1.25 FAR) Specific Plan area Plan SP designation 86 Mixed Use CG-FI(Commercial Q-IL(Qualified,Industrial Industrial(1-Fl or F2) _ General,Dcnsit (135 FAR) Limited) 87 CO(Commercial RI -30(Residential High CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(C'G-FI) General) Density 30 ut/ac x3. CG(Commercial RII-30(Residential High - CO(Commercal(jeweral) Commercial Cxamal/CG-Fll General) Density 30 w✓ac _ 89 RL(Residential RL•6.5(Residential Loin RI-O-CZ/RL(Residential Open Space-Park(OS-P) Lay Density) Density 6.5 citti Lae Density,Oil(T,crlay, Coastal Zonc/Rcsidcatial Low Density 90. 1)OS-C(Open MI1-F2.25-SP(Mixed I)RA-O-CC-CZ-FP2 Agree with Staff.mcnmmcnd Space- Use Hori-mual.Density 05 (Residential Agricalturc,Oil retain cvistinRAcsignationsas Conservation;2) FAR.25 dvhic,Specific. Overlay,Coasia)Conservation. recommended by the California VSC(Visitor Plan) ('anual Zeno.Fbxxlplaui Coastal Commission String 2)VSC.-C7,-F•PZ Visitor - Commercial) Serving Commercial.Coastal 3)R 4)RM Zone,Floodplain - (Residenlal 1)MH-CZ-F'P2(Mobile Medium Density) lourc,Coastal Zone,Floodplain 4)Mt-A-O-CZ-FP2 (industrial Limited,Oil Os•crlay, Coastal zoni Fl in IOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTI6E$` PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE j NOTICE OF NOTICE OF BSC4962 1 PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF: BEFORE THE CITY BEFORE THE ZONING PETITION TO COUNCIL OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF ADMINISTER CITY.OF THE CITY OF ESTATE.OF: HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH GRACE ROCHELLE NOTICE IS HEREBY NOTICE IS HEREBY JONES aka GRACE GIVEN that on Monday, GIVEN that on Wednesday, R.JONES i April 15, 1996,at 7:00 PM. April 17, 1996, at 1:30 PM " CASE NO.A181996 neral Platt in the Ci Council Cham- (n the Room B 6, 2000 To all heirs,beneficiaries, he future tiers, 20 0 Main Street, Main Street, Huntington creditors, contingent credi- Huntington Beach,.the City Beach,the Zoning Adminis- tors,and persons who may k er its. These Council will hold a public trator will hold a public otherwise er interested in I hearing on,the following hearing; on the following 15 and planning and zoning item items: the will or estate, or both, — — — (ieneral which was continued.from 1. RECONSIDERATION of: GRACE ROCHELLE = c j c �' _ C, the March 18,. 1996 City OF SPECIAL SIGN PERMIT JONES aka GRACE R. = _ = - i cc reverse Council meeting: - A PETITION has been NO. 95-13/PLANNED SIGN JONES — =' r ? ` . n 1: Consideration of incor- . PROGRAM NO. 95-11 T I n ( ^' ZO porationof the followin re filed by GEORGE G. m n g (MOBIL SIGNS)): Applicant: JONES in the SuperioF = ". j o _' — z —1 strictions into deeds for Robert H.Lee$Associates Court of California, County �• ;parcels of[arid to be trans- Request: Reconsideration of ORANGE. O(erred from the City of Hun- of th+g.approved location THE PETITION requests n, N l tington Beach to the for a five(5)foot,seven(7) F, j If f ,_Cn11nty—gf_Orange !fir de inch high, 42 square foot that GEORGE G. JONES - I velopment as the Harriett freestanding monument be appointed as personal I y ; - ag representative to adminis- M. Wieder Regional Park sign identifying Mobil. Lo- ter the estate of the dece- - — (formerly the Boise Chica cation: 9001 Adams Av- dent. V. Regional Park or the Linear enue (northeast corner at THE 2ETITION requests r 7 ° = C Park): Magnolia Street) Planner I — O 1. Restrictions that the Assigned:Wayne Carvalho authority to administer.the n — an parcels be held in perpetu- 2. CONDITIONAL USE estate under the In of Es dent Administration of Es- ity for park use; PERMIT NO. 95-54 (MA.. tates Act. (This authority c,' = Z 2. Restrictions-that land- RINA CLASSIC CAR r — O will allow the personal re n r 3 scaping on the parcels be WASH):Applicant:Stephen P p = (� 1 '_1 resentative to take many restricted to native vegeta- F. Perkins Request: Revi- actions without court ap- o �^ m lion. Sion to Condition of Ap- f , 3. Restrictions on the use proval #1,to allow the two prove[. Before taking ter- y tain very Important actions, _of .herbicides and pest!- 2 18 foot b 18 foot exist- ( ) Y however,the personal rep- cides on the parcels; ing shades in lieu of re- c s resentative will be required 4. Restrictions requiring moval and replacement _ _ o cment completion of a compre with permanent wood to give notice to Interested. �. — _—, (p { persons unless they have m N hensive survey of archaeo frame canopy structures. c r — waived notice or consented logical sites on the Hun- Location:6001 Edinger Av- to the proposed action. = r W ncnt tington mesa; - enue (northeast corner at p p ) o = _ $ --+ r— I The independent adminis- — ❑ oe �. 5. Restriction specifying. Springdale) Planner As- T �. tration authority will be o u va the installation of ranch signed:Susan Pierce- I I _ — _ < = r--r ' Z ranted unless an inter-type fencing along the NOTICE IS HEREBY granted r' �' ~. O person files an ob — 5 c — CD eastern border of the park GIVEN that Items #1, — jection to:the-petition and _ U v- n C ►� to deter adjacent de- - and#2 are categorically ex- show good cause why the velopment activities from empt from the provisions of g n f H encroachingon to or dis the California Environmen- court should not rant the 1. turbing the ark area;and tal Quality Act. authority o� i — aL = Q 6.Restrictions to'minimize ALL INTERESTED PER- A HEARING on the'pall- ❑ r J (1 (D + grading and landform mod SONS are invited to attend lion will be held,on MAY t. J� p � = ification to preserve the said hearing and express 1996, at 1:45 P.M. in Dept. r n 703 located at 341 The City r. n natural topography of the opinions or submit evi- Drive South, Orange,,.CA '— 'o. site. dence for or against the I = c ❑ ( C 7. Restrictions prohibiting application as outlined 92668.0U OBJECT TO the W the provisions of .parking above.If you challenge the n granting of ear at ear- areas and paving in the. Zoning Administrator's ac- �---C � O i - p g g should appear at the hear- - - park;and tion in court, you may be ing and state your ob- 8..Requirements for a vol- limited to raising only those jections or file written ob- Iucs you or unteer coordinator to im- issues you or someone lections with the court be- plement a volunteer 'as- else raised at the public hg described fore the hearing. Your ap-" sisted planting program. hearing described 'in this Mce delivered In light of recent requests. notice, or-in written cor- or by o may be in person the surrounding com- respondence delivered to or by your attorney. rring. If there by � P IF YOU ARE A CREDITOR. I munity for the provision of the City at, or prior to the c Deparim°"t neighborhood h park facili- public hearing. Under the t a contingent creditor of 71 and refer ties within the Harriett M. provisions of the Hunting- the deceased,you must file Wieder Regional.Park, the ton Beach Zoning and Sub- Your claim with the court written 9 9 and mail a copy to the per- Huntington Beach. City division Ordinance,the as sonat representative ap- Council is also being re- tion taken by the Zoning pointed by the court within quested to give staff direc- Administrator is final unless, four months from the data Ation on the Incorporation of an appeal If filed to the of first issuance of the let- 5datc — minor active park facilities Planning Commission by of fires provided in the section I (such as totlots and open you or by an interested 9100 of the California Pro- bate i play areas). party.Said appeal must be, bate Code.The time for fil- ON FILE: A copy of the in. writing and must set ar I claims will not expire I i48 proposed request is on file forth in detail the action before four months from in the City Clerk's Office, and grounds by which the the hearing date noticed 2000 Main Street, Hunting- applicant or Interested ton Beach, California. party deems `himself .ag- above. MAY EXAMINE the 92648, for inspection by grieved. Said appeal must file kept by the court.If you I. the public. A.copy of the be accompanied by.-'a filing are a person Interested in, used li'Ve on staff report will be available fee of Two Hundred Dollars. to interested parties at the ($200.00) if the appeal is the estate, you may file _ City Clerk's Office after filed by a single family quest for Special Notice of with the court a formal Re- April 1,1996. dwelling property owner ALL INTERESTED PER- appealing the decision on the filing of o inventory - and appraisal off estate 4 or SONS are invited to attend his own property and Six sets or of any petition or said hearing and express Hundred Fifty Dollars account as provided in was opinions or submit evi- ($650.00) if the appeal is section 1250 of the Califor-. dence for or against the filed by any other party. nia Probate Code. A Re- application as outlined The appeal shall be sub- quest for Special Notice n above. If there are any fur- mitted to the Secretary of form is available from the �cnnsideiedby ther questions please call Planning Commission court clerk. . Julie Osugl, Associate within.ten (10) calendar. nt and the Planner, at (714) 536.5271 days of the date of the Attorney for the Petl- onif+sting tilt and refer to the above Zoning_ Administrator's ac tioner: I item. Direct your written tion, unless otherwise LAW OFFICE OF v+ronmental' communications to the City noted.If there are any fur- JOHN M.RAIDER ((crriding Clerk. ther questions please call (CSB#39338), 8413. j tat heIp'to Connie_ Brockway, the Planning Division at SIERRA AVE. STE. A 1 into the final City Clerk,City of Hun- 536-5271 and refer to the FONTANA,CA 92335 ', I tin ton Beach 2000 above items. Published Huntington gat cannot he 9 r Herb Fauland, Hun- g i �Ilaln.Street,2nd Floor, Beach-Fountain Valley In- nvironrnental tingten Beach Zoning i Huntington Beach,Cal- dependent April 4, 11, 18,- t unayoidable Ifornia 92648 (714) Administrator 1996 �as. 53"227 Published Huntington .041-310 'I Plan that are Published Huntington Beach-Fountaln Valley In- Beach-Fountain Valley In-. dependent April 4,1996. bn process will 041-338 On the move?" iew and dependent April 4,1996. for rev 041 3,2 TRADE Sell our extra r City Council Sell your home y through classified. household 642-5678 through classified items . 7_tr.�7l2— __in�f`laceifia_,- i PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUkIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES Continued from previous page PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS OF T1111. GENERAL PLAN January 20, 1996 I � I ' A i 3 g W I OLSA x 1�•�•�,-sue i <¢ ARGOSY r w y ( IM O b Mc FAD DEN Ls Z 8 — 8 I � �z I 80 •34l I ?Zb 1i C iN'I'ER3 < ZI 30 DI 3S — EDINGtIi 1 � Iq Lo 96 I I 34 3e 1 79 35 94051 ZS Rio 3•I WARNER 74V 77 — — l$ ty 41 yt SLATER 1 y� yl yL C� 95 TALBERT t ELLIS z 3 0 I 61 Iw 7'i w 8 S 8� 7S — — - C'ARMEL loll �• bT 13 44 y 5 �O 89 YORX.-I'O W N 66 'L % / o�� Lb 81 41 I ADAMi i O h b S COd (04 r b IINDIANAPOLIS bl 1 ATLANTA S� 93 So E HAMIITON D Q 5`1 Z f This map presents the general location of proposed changes to the General Plan t rANNTNG 1 1 � !and use designations. Please contact the 3 Department of Community Development i t for more detail and explanation. 1 < Continued on next page 'I i PurslrcwpTl�s PUB�rc wrmserr PUBLIC NOTICW ""PUBLIC W0'nCE87_ -PMItNOTWES PUBLIC Nuppe Continued from previous page PROPOSED GF:NE.12A1.PLAN EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING CONMISSION LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS No GENERAL ADVISOR} RECOMNIENDAVIONS OF TIIE UPDATED GENERAL PLAN PLAN COMMIT"rEE (Designatitms to he coreddercd Jammu 2(1,1996 DESICNA'r1pN DESIGNATION _ _ br the City CnunCilsa --hl CG(('nu nercud CR-F2-D(Connnrnanl i CG(C.."inuci:d GCnera) ('oniniereral Regional(CR-F2- - The rollowing table presents a list of the In in I luntiugton Beach that are Ieco nnlended to have the Gencrah Regional.Dcnsn,u 5 FAR. D) General Plan land use designation changed or altered The table describes existing General Plan designation.the �_ _ Des,•n Oycrla,) General flan Advisor v Countrulteds recommended land use dC5Ignalions,the exi%fi tg-nmL.and[lie Plaint¢ 11 CG(Conimeraal CR-F2-1)(Conunercial CG(Comnt-ml General) Comna:¢cnl Regional(CR-F2- Commission's recommended land use designations. A map,with corresponding numbers,has been included to General) Regional.Density o 5 FAR. Of _ UCsi n(Txrlav) _ aid in the location of the alieded properties. 12 CG(Commercial CR•F2-D(Commercil CG(Commercial General) Cormercial Regional(CR-F2- __ General) Regional.Density 0 5 FAR. O) E'-'7NG GF,NERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNIN(:COMMISSION _ _ Design O alas) _ NO GENERAL .ADVISORV RECOMMF.NDA'FIONS it P,Q-1'P MV-F'8-D(Mixed Use RI,(Residential Lose Uerruty). M1ftacd Use Vertical(MV-PR-DI I Phr\N COMM I'1-fF.E (Designationr to be etmidered (Public. Vertical.Ucnsih IS FAR IG(General IuAua riap•CG-II DESICNAl 11 __RESIGNATION he the('iry fnunciZ�_ Quart•I'nhlle. IAil1I,0 75 PAIL ICI.25 (('ouuucrcial Gcncr.J-I ligh Bice I� RL(Rcsiacnuai� CN-FI(Commercial CG-FP2((ounnercial Gcncral. Conuucrtad Neighbeil-I hsulnhmml)91D m✓nc) 0%crl:p9 Low Density) Neighborhood,Dcnsil,0.15 Flrndplaul)- -- (CN-FI) --- - -- I (M,ed r ___ FAR) De%clopntcnh 2. RII IRcsulenual F(it li-Ul)I'uhlic- RH(licsidcntml Ihgh Ucnsuyy RCs;dallial I High Dens10 undal,ing Resulcanial High -- dw,gnahon.decrease in detrsuy I 1.1 CG(Commercial MV-1:9-SP(Miscd Usc CG(Commercial General) Conm,erc,:d Regional-FAR 5- _ Drnsiis In tin✓ac Oom_1u m 7 du/ac.1'(Ill.=) - General) Vertical,Dcnsily 1.5 FAR Specific Plan(CR-F2-SP) t RI.(RcmJCnual CN-Irl ICouuncmal CG(Commercial Gcncral) Conuuer-I Noghlxthond I IMIII,0 5 FAR ICI.25 un/ac _ t ow Ucnsily_ Neighborhood,Ucnsily(1.15 ICN-Fq I 15 C G,(Contneraal MV-Flo-D-A(Mixed CG-RMII-RM(Comm ar(Commercial Mixed Use Vortical.dease ) J RL(Residential P(RI,-G 5)Public- RL(Residential Low Dersil)) Public(P)designation,rclam General)RMII Use Vertical.Density 1 5 Gcncral•Residential Medium density from 25 W IS du/ae m (Residential FAR IMUI.1.5 FAR ICI,25 high Dcnsitc;Residential Low Dcnsny) undcrh ing Low Ucnsily aximum 70 ddae I Mc-1%)RM dwac.Design O,-error.Arno Ncdium Density) Residential,G 5 unhic 5 Recicauon P(Public) RA-RI.(Rcsidcntial Public IN designatimt toDcnsm)RM (hxrlay) Agriculture.Residential Low ,dcutifr ntihl)right of uac (Rcsidcnial [knsib9 Mcd,um Dcnsitc) __ C, RL IRCridcn Ill CN-1:1(Cornntern:J CG-FP2(Commercial Gcneral. Cmnrrrercial NeighborhooA _ iG. CG(Commercial MV-Flo-D-A(Mixed CG-RM(Conuncrcial General. Mixed Use Vertical,declatse Lou Dcn5ny) I Ncigltlwrhmd.Dcnsitc 015 Fioodpla,n) (CN-F1) I I _ FARf GGeneral)I(M Use Vertical.Densnc 1 5 Residenlal Medium Dcnsitc) density front 25 to IS divac ' % 1 RL(Iicsalc_ -_ CN-FI(Commercial Q-CG-FP2(Qualified, Cmnntcrcl:d Ncighborh«d� (Residential FAR IMUI.1.5 FAR(CI.25 r I Low Ucn5,ly) Neighborhood,Ucnsm 0.15 Caruncreial Gcncral. (CN-FI) Medium Dcusny) O,dulc,l Design(herlay,Auto _FAR) _ Floodplai1) O<crla)) 7 RM IRcs7leniial OS-P(O Icn Space-Park OS-PR-FP2(O xn Space. Open S ace-Park(US-P) I - CG(Connnerc,al MV-Flo•D(Mixed Use RM(Residential Medium 'fixed Use Vertical.decrease 1 p• ) I p+ j Rc R- - I Gorcrnh RM Vertical.DcnSiry 1.5 FAR Dcnsily) i acusih front 25 to IS dm•ac t \icJuun Pcuml,) I Parks and Rccrr.Ilron, FlnnJ I-0 IRcsiAemial IMUI.15 FAR ICI,25 , 1- - - —1>_a�r--- ----- -- Medimu Deasy dutac•Design O crlac) II I RAI(lie, emu:I� l'N-FI-D(Cmnurcrc,al CG(Cornnu'rc'i;d(cncral) Cons c,cml Noghbodio d -- - y-- t r M11cdI,Im Ucnsih) NCI hM11 o d.Ucnsily 0 1a 1 I% RI (Rcsdcmial P(RMI1-25)Public- RMFI(Residential Medmmt Iligh Residential Medium High I I _ FAR Dcslgn Occrlarl High Uatsih) mid,un,11 Residentialsy. Uctts,ly) Ucnsily and add Public(11) nRe'-4.-timl OS-P(Open Space-Park) R%I-0(ReS:doulal MWunn Open Sp;-P;uk(OS-P! _ Mcdmm Ihgh Dcnsnp.25 den,uN bon.1,1 d23 dui" _ klrchum PcuvOy�) _i UCnsln_Od O crlac) un-nc) dcnslh Irma 15 kt 2S dt✓ac t RM(RcSldonml P(RM-I5l Iir6lic- RM(Rcsidcntial Medium Pubhe(P) ni- 1-M1h scd l'sc --- I2M1II I-25(Rcsldcmal ItM1111 - - ---- -"-- -- --� I Mcdnuu Uencin9 I underlcutl;Resnlenual �Dc n,,,,) I Q- (Qual,lied.Iies,denlcd Resndenllal Medlin",High 1 Mcd i Dens.1,15 mnla, j Mcduu i Ihgh Dcnsn,.25 Medium Illgit Density) Dcnsitc 25 chide I IJ R:\i�Rcslaclriial P niM-I5)Puhhc--- I(Rcsldcmial Me,]n Pabhc(Pl --- I 4--- --------- uwae) _ r j I Jn I Cenuuocial RM-15(Rcsuknii;J OP(Omce Professional) C'ommcrnal General-FAR 15 M1l..iunl Densml undcrh u,g RcsaaOial nsm) I 1 Me dmnl i)cnmh I5 wtmc i (atcral b 1cAuun Dcn ") G ) - sits (C'-FI 15 I6 flndnunal P(h Public-undcri,ing II.(Indnz,nal la nuMJ) Puhhc(P) ' 1__-______-_- -_-_._____-_ L Ga,crah Induslnal I 11 CG fConnncrelal RII-in(RcvJrnual I{Igh _CG_(Commercial G ter. Conoucrcnal Gcmxal-PAR 15 -_�___-_-__ -L_- !Gencrah Dcusity,In uu/ac) _ _ (CC.-FIT j r I J2 RM(ReciJenual P(Public)-designation to CG(Commercial Gencrah -- Public(11) _---� I Alcdnun Dcnsitc) rc0ec11wspllal I ,r r F,XIS IING GF:NERAI.PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION I NO CF.NF.RAI. Atri'ISORY RECOMM ENDAI IONS NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMF.NIIAI'I INS PLAY COM11rfTF.F, (Designations In he considered PLAN ('OMMI'rrEE (Designations to bC aussidcred r DFGIGNAI ION DESIf.N ATION by the Cih Council DESIGN'A PION DF.SIGNA'1'ION h1�6c Ciq(nW7d1 I l Ir. j M-11 Kill-F to-SP(Mncd I'wfica C'oum,nmh Pl.m M,ccd 1 Esc and add Sy-fic --- '- -- - --"-"a `"`� �_ - _. `-- De"lejunent Ike Ilon-enrol Ucnclh 1 0 Plan(SP) RM(Ilmd-nlml 1 Rh11I 's(!ics,dentml IIM-ITMll dt I l I tl I Ii ddcnual Mcdmnt Densm Is f %k(lum,Uen,M) \lcdmm,I high Dcnsl(%.15 \lcdium De tint,-.Re dU-I L11 `Au•�C FAR.tit lac,Sped Oc r _-— _Iun ac) _ _- Meduun I hILh Ilan) -- ! LJ R11 f RCculcn0.I I Rif-L,(Rcsldcmial fhgh 11\1-RAlll iRcsdcnllal Rcsldcmial hlcdium UaKih 15 1;I �1' Me(Revdential j 1'(17MFI-25) Poch- RM{I(Residentinl\lcduu H,, ,bh (P)declgnmlon,increase 1_ I MCdu nu Demsdy, DCucit'.10 tin%act Mcdinm lk 1'.Itcsidcnual du;ac i Mcdmm )cnsily) Medium H IteslJenlity Ueusily) do'fl'fnv11 15 10 25 du ce I M'dm_m I heh Ua=�sn,) Mcdmm High Density 25 I---- - - JS It11 lRcsidenual CG-FI(Cmnntercml RM(Rcsidcntial Medium I Conuucraal Gcncral(CG-PI I ( buttiac I \IcJmm_D.:mny)__ Gcncral. I% RA1 iRcsdcnrlal OS Park(Open Space.Park) US-PIE(Open Space,Parks and Open Space-Park(OS-Po I--- - - -----� r j Jn TIM(Rcs,deminl RII-10(Rcsdetrul Ihgh RM(Itc,ulen dal Nedun, ---- Res dC ti:d Sted,.ni Dcnsn)15 Mcdmm Dnlsu_,I Rccrc:umn) _ ------ I} _ \lcdmm Dcnsm 1 `.UC�nsib_10 uu/ac) Dcusih) _ �d,.is (! 19 RI.(RcvJcnful Rht I (RcsdatU J RMP IRceiJcnlial hlanufaelurcd I Itcctdc u,al 1 uw Ucnsm 7 n --; - - --" - ----- -- - -' - - J- R\I(Rc a t I P(RII lint Public- I7M17 1Rcs duninl Mob nl -�Ra unal Mcdmm Demny I5 r I L. Dcu.iI') Medu n Dc ,uy 15 mriac) I Ionic Park) I duMe and a Id Mobile I Ionic i b dmm D I uuacrh mg RcstAcnbal Iheh Dcnut}') dt a aI A add Pit bl c(1 1) Ir1 I P. k O,a I I- j - _ Dutsu, to un%acl clJurua1 11'(111I tu)I'thhc RM Ilt-c dc"u l Mcd.on_ - --.PCIIII-tUll\1 d I 11) 11h 1S- / ?' I Rl.IliccidcnlLd I P(ItL G 5)Public- Ill.(Rcsulum.,l Low Durs")) I Public(P)dcs,gncillon.'M.. Mednun Uorc,h) underhmf Residential I hgh Denstrl I dI-ac.r,d auJ Puhhc(P) r I o„Ucnsny) undcrlyu,g Resldoni:d Lou- I mnxmnuu ZO Au ac to tiwac) _ _ __ Ucnsm.. __I 1 --1---- -- - -- --- - --- --------- ----- -- J•n RM(ResidrnUnl P IRII-U0 Puhhc 17M IRevden,ial S1eJInm-_- -Iresdcm,al Medium Do,sh IS I' 21 Sit(Scnmr I(MII-25(Icsdcntial (Q)PMI I(Quahhcd. Satior Rcsldcmial to Itaidortctl Mcdmm Dcnsn,1 unJcrlenlg Itesnlcn0al 1 hgh Dcnsp) Jrrae:rod:rJd Rlbhe(P) ' Rcsd nual) Mcdnun Ihgh Dcncilc 25 Re"deroal M11cJIwn Ihgh) Nleduun Iligh(RMII-25) TII III Ucnsih.40 uu'ac) un/ac) RM(Residential (-N-FI(('onuncr.ial I RM-FP2(Rcsidcntial Mcdmm -Itcsidcnual Mcdmnt Dcush M din i Dcnsh) !NClphher bond.i)awm 0.11 Ucuc,Ic.Fkxdplain) IICM-15)a0d Commcn.ial 2 CG(('mm�icrcial ::,,I '1(CN-1 I)Pu blic- CG I(onuucraal Gcncral) Public 11') - i 1-Ali I, ,Ii orhood(CN-FI) r I Gorerah ndcrl,,n C l, onmicrcial -Z_ _ ____. c_- _ _ _ 51 ('1gCnmmcrcial RM-I5 tJicsidcnual CG-FP2(('mn__mcroal 6eu-0. Cemn,crcmi Gcncral(CG-FIf Noehholho(d,Dcnsitc 1115 I I GamraD FAR) RI.!Rcsldcnlml (';•i-F I(Comnlcrmal CG(Commercial Gcncral) Rclldcmial I ow Dursrt}'0 21 Ind a'- MH-FI-lu-SP(M11ncd h1]-OI-('%.RJ-O-CZ;CI Miscd-Usc Ilon.onal; i 6 ) -p.e-d item nie Rgmll RI. Uctrs,n l I N:,-1 1(C rxl -c l 15 dn;:ic. F Rccourcc Ike 110-ontal.Dcnslh n 15 -O(Z Ilndus(nal(:cncml.Oil recommend 1'2-1u(5 PAR.LI _ ___ _ _ _____ _ m add Ihsmnc 07 erlay Production FAR.10 w✓ac,Spcc,fnc O crlac.Cotmal Zonc. dm'ac),rccouunnrd"mcragc' -_I 57 US-C(Open Space RI.-(.5(Itcsdouml Lnw-_- LLIU-CZ-IP2 ILimitcd Csc Opcn Space Conse.nation(OS- 1'lan) Rcsidcntial Ihgh Zone: Oil dcnsin-of 15 AuiaC - I Oycrinc,Coastal Zonc: I I I -(onceryal rot) Ucusity.fi 5 nit;ac) Uistricl.Coastal%one, (l _ ___ _ 1=had ilam) _____ _ ` - -L Cmnmcrcial.lid Z nrhnod,Od ! al R11(ItcciJcnual R1. (-5/RII-w \lagnulia P:IcihC Spculie 1'IaI Icsdcmial Wdunn Dcm,ly 15 O,midi,('oaslal Zonc) � . .__ cr min Ucnstyl Ilics:damial Low Upicnc. (. - -- I M-1 du dcsa�nauon and:xkl 21 IG(hlAuyvlal RM-15(Rcvdcnual IG(Induslr,al Gencrah Residential Low Dcnsrt,-7l1 � L$nurar,Rcsdcnual high CpCcifc Plan(hcrlay _- Gencrah %ledi..Dcnsn,.Is um'ac) du/ac - _-- _.___ 2'. IG Undo<trial 1-r2-IT(Industnal,Dcnsily IL Llnductnal Linuted) add Ifisloric(hcrl:n. I lit lRcaJcnlul RM-I s(Rcsrdcn0al RMI'(Rcs,Jcnl,al 11anuL aurcd desdcuhal Low Darsllp 7L I ' i.o„Ucnsih-) Mcttium Dcmih.15 tin/ac) Ilonrc I'a rk) JI✓ac dcs,guai,on:md aid I' Gcncmh 0.5 FAR,Historical Oycrla- Fr - llomc(TcI Lt ,.(, I RL(RcsIai P(RL-(+.5)Puhi,c- RL(Residential Low Dcns,t)) I Public(P)Jcs,gnauon,roam co CG(Commercial RM-15(Residential CG(Conmtcrcial Ocncmh Cunmcrcal Gencril(CG-FI) I Law Dcnsitc) undcrh lug Rcsldcmial Lms maximum 7 o dm'ac ( _r 1 DcnsilyG 5 ur✓ac _ �- Gcnctah _hlcdium Dcnc,h,i5 tin/ac 27 I RL(Rcsidcntial y P(RL-(,i)Public- RL(Residential Low Ucns,h9 Public(P)designation,retain I ;('G(C'mnnrcnaal It1I-Ut(Iicslacntial Ihgh RII(Residential Fligh Ucnsih) �RcsiJortial Mcdmm Densih 15 I Gcncral) Dcnsh.10 urt/ac) do'ac I I Low Ucnsih) undcrls,ng Residential Luw maximum 7 n dm'ac j ! I Dcnslh 0.5 un/ac —� RM11(RCstdcnual Rif-in(Rcsidcntial Ihgh I RI I(Residential Ihgh Dcnsty) r 2>i RM(Rcsidcntial CN-FI(Commercial CG(Conunerc,al Gcncral) Cmnmcrcial Neighborhood Kled,uln Dcncuy) Ncightxxhoud.Ucnsily 0.15 (CN-F 1) I Mcd,um Ucnsily) Dcusih 10 m✓ac) j I -_ P(C _- sac CG(Commercial RM1IIi-25(Rcsidcntial CG(Commcroal Gcncmh C'on,nicrmal Gcncral(CGFi) P.Q-P.I(Public. P(CG-FI)Public- PS(Public Scn,i Public) Commercial GCncral I('G-PI) 1 i Gcncral) Medium lbgh Dcns,q.25 Quasi-Public undethu a Commercial and add Public(11)designaunit I I I ) 1 Instuutionarl) Gcncral.Dcmih 015 FART 1°✓'tc fin I'hi i, CG-IFI(Conunc:nal TCG(Commercial Gcncral) -�ch.ycJ Gsc and odd SpxiGc C-irtu y GCnerll,DcnsiuOISFAR) I I Plan 0,erlav__,_�J 4 Continued on next page I I' PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: February 29, 1996 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 29 , 1996 at Costa Mesa, California. Signature i i P�BLIG NtLTICES PUBLWOTt �, if PUBLIC NOTICES City. of Huntington Beach General Plan Update I HUN TON BEACH City Council Review Schedule The City of l luntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the "constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set ofgoals and policies. 'These policies are then utili/ed to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments,please utilvc the following schedule(See reverse side for more information) i Study Session N1 Study Session 113 field February 26,1996 5:00 P.M. April 8,1996 •:Review March 25, 1996,actions Study Session N2 -.-Circulation Element held Slarch 11,1996 -.-Land Use Element -el-and Use Map PUBLIC HEARING NO.1 5:00 P.M. March 25,1996 PUBLIC HEARING NO.2 •:•Overview 5:00 P.M. April 22,1996 -*-Public Ilearing Procedure •:•Introduction •:•Environmental Impact Report •:•Public Ilearing Procedure •:•Air Quality Element -.-Circulation Element -:-Noise Element •:•Land Use Elcmcnt •:•Environmental Hazards Element .•Land Use Map •:•Ilazardous Materials Element •:•Utilities Element Final Study Session N4 •:•Urban Design Element 4:00 P.M. May 6,1996 •:•Recreation and Community Services Element •:•Review April 22, 1996,actions 0-Historic and Cultural Resources Element '.'Outstanding Issues •:•Public Facilities and Public Services Element •:•Review final action on the FIR •:•Envirommental Resources and Conservation -.-Review final action on General Plan t Element -:-Housing Element FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO.3 4-Growth Management Element 5:00 P.M. May 13,1996 -:-Coastal Element ❖Introduction •:•Economic Development Element ;Public 1 Fearing Procedure Final action on Outstanding Issues -:-Final Action on the Circulation Element •:•l--inal action on the Land Use Map ^Final Action on the Land Use Element •:•Final action on the EIIt •:•Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS AND sTUDY-SESSIONS All P,ibtic Clearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2006 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA in this notice,or in written correspondence'doliNcred 92648. The Public hearings will be held in the to the City at,or prior to the public hearing Ifthere City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any�further questions,please call the Department be held in Room B-8,both located in the lower level of Community Development at 5346-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note:due to the amount of information,any- , or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway,City Clerk alternate dates. In addition,scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates To City of Huntington Beach r confirm the topic,time,and date,please contact 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development I luntington Beach,CA 92648 at(714)536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714)536-5227 (714)536-5227 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit �1117-V Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and 1 - , a Environmental Impact Report If you challenge the City C'ouncil's action in court,you NOTICE.1S HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was procqssed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and,therefore,an Environmental Impact Report was warranted Environmental Impact Report No 94-1 will also be considered Ily the City Council and is on file at the City oftluntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,and is available.for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271 In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No.94-1,the City Council will consider mitigation measuresand a Statement of Overriding Considerations Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted,the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the]trial general Plan "rhe Statement of Overriding Considerations identities significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan.,The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation,air quality,and noise environmental issue areas PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council,the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal-none must be certified by the California Coastal Cornmissiim. The certification process Mil begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for rc%iew and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year alter City Council adoption. I - PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUKIC NOTIMI PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLICS PUKCWTM PUBtC I wms Continued from previous page PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN, LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN January 20, 1996 f j In W BOLSA ✓� x IT u j < ARGOSY r !' i $ Z BOA• Mc FAD L�I� Zt z 8 — B $O 33 l Zb7 1l c 3bi EDINGER 1 30 �ji . ` �9 L� 3S — ♦ Zo qb I Ilftil. 34316 79 35 '�31 WARNER Z5 `io 37 — 74 la Zy 41 `il 15 ♦• 18 t ♦ `11 SLATF,R y ♦ . tit41- C� 9 TALBERT ♦ t ELLIS O OxG ell • ♦ 8L lS — — — — — • DARFIF,i, ♦ 6q 10 iy y) $7 56 . ♦• 4��3 44 55 / A 8 Y yS YORKTO W N bia 2 , 6 r C'�e La 89 41 i A 43 YY ADAMS O 6 S Cad 44� i 4 ,INDIANAPOLIS i •' bi b e r • ATLANTA - r I IAMII TON This map presents-the general location of proposed changes to the General Plan i ' BANNING land use designations. Please contact the Department of community Development 3 r for more detail and explanation. � i Continued on next page i I UBLIC NOTICES PUB�.IC NOTICES PUBLIC'NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES - PUBL'IC`NOTICES',' PUBLICaN01YCES= PUBLIC NOTICES°. . Continued from previous page PROPOSED GENF,RAL PLAN EXISTING GENERAL PION EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION_ LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UPDATED GENERAL PLAN{ PLAN COMMITTEE (Designations to he coukidemd January 20,I996 - DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the City Council 30. CG(Como creial CR-F2-D(Commercial CG(Conuncrcial General) Commercial RegmnaI'(CR-F2- _ The following table presents a list of the properties in I luntington Beach that are tecommended to have the General) Regional.Density 0 5 FAR D) General Plan land use designation changed or altered, The table describes existing General Plan designation,the Design Overlay General Plan Advisory Committee's recommended hand use dosignations,the existing zoning,and the I'laning 31 CG(Commercial CR-F2-D(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Commercial Regional(CR•F2- Commission's recommended land use designations. A map,with�corres ondin numbers,has beedincluded to GcncraH _ Regional,Ucnsity os FAR, D) g P P g Desi n Overlay aid in the location of the affected properties. - 32. CG(Commercial CR-F2-D(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Commercial Regional(CR-F2- General) Regional.Density 0.5 FAR, D) F.XISI'INC GENERAL PLAN F,XIS'1'ING--/,ONINC PLANNING COMMISSION. Dcsi n Oscrla (/ NO GENERAL, ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS 31. P,Q-P,P MV-1 -D(Mixed Use. Rh IResidenlial Lew Dcnsily), Mixed Use Vertical(MV-F%-1)) PLAN ADVISORY (Designations to be i•onsidered (Public, Vcnccal,Density 1.5 PAR IG(General Industrial),CG-I I ' -DESIGNATION DESIGNATION try the City Council Onast-Public, IMU1.0 15 FAR lCl.25 1('uruutereial General-I fig],Rise - I RL(Residential CN-FI(Commcrctal CG-FP2(Commercial General, Commercial Neighborhoob Inmiulimml)MD mJac) Overlay) ' Loy Density) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 Floodplain) (CN-FI) (Mixed FAR) Development) 2. RI I(Residential P(RI I-30)Public- RH(Residential High Density) Residential Los,a ith Public(P) High Density) umderh ing Rcsidcnlial High designation.decrease in densny. 34. CG(Commercial MV-F9-SP(Mixed Use CG(Commercial General) Commercial Regional-FAR:5- Density 30 un/ae from 30 to 7 du/ac.P(RL-7) General) Vertical,Density 1.5 FAR Specific Plan(CR--F2-SP) 1, Rt.(Residential CN-FD(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Commercial Neighborhood IMU1,0 5 FAR lCl.25 Law Density Neighborhood.Density 0.35 (CN-FI) uNae t / FAR 35. CG(Commcrctal MV-Fill-D-A(Mixed CG-RMH-RM(Commercial Mixed Use Vertical,decrease j 4 RL(Residential P'(RL-6 5)Public- RL(Residential Low Density) Public(P)designation;retain General)RMI I Use Vertical,beastly 1.5 Gencml,Rcsidcnlial Medium densiy front 25 to IS du/ae law Density) undcrly ing Loy Density maximum 7.0 duac (Residential - FAR JMU1.1.5 FAR lCl,25 High Density;Residential _ Residential,6.5 mt/ac Medium High diJac,Design Overlay,Auto Medium Density) 5 Recreation _P(Public) RA-Rl,(Residential Public(P)designation to Dcnsuy)RM Overlay) - Agriculture,Residential Law identify utility right of way. Mcdium[)e _ Density) Mcdinm[)easily) - 6 RL(Rcsidcntial CN-FI(F.omiuerctal CG-FP2(Conuncrcial General. Commercial Neighborhood - 36. CG(Commercial MV•FIt)-D-A(Mixed CG-RM(Commercial General. Mixed Use Vertical,decrease Low Density) NcighborMil.Density 015 Floodpinin) (CN-FI) General)RM Use Vertical,Density 1 5 Residential Medium Density) density from 25 to 15 do/ac. FAR) _ (Rcsidcntial FAR IMU1,1.5 FAR[Cl.25 x RL(Residential CN-FI(Commercial Q-CG-FP2(Qualified, Commercial Neighborhood Medium Density) du/ae.Design Overlay,Auto Low Ucnsity) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 Contractual General, (CN-FI) Overlay) _ FAR) hood lain) 3T CG(Commercial MV-Flo-D(Mixed Use RM(Residential Medium Mixed Use Vertical,decrease 9 RM(Residential OS-P(Open Space-Park) OS-PR-FP2(Open Space. Open Space-Park(OS-P) - General)RM Vertical,Density 1 5 FAR Density) density from 25 to 15 divac Meduun Ucusily) Pinks mud Recreation, (Rcsidcnlial IMU1,1 5 FAR ICI,25 _ _ __ Flumd lain) Medium )cnsio• y dudac,Dcsi n Oterla 11 RM(Rcsidcntial CN-FI-D(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Commercial Neighborhood 18. RII(Residential P(RMH•25)Public- RMH(Residential Medium High _Residential Medium High j Mcdinm Density) Neighborhood,Density 4?5 (CN-FI-D) High Density) underlying Residential t Density) Density and add Public(11) ' FAIT.Design 0%ulay) Mcduu I High Density,25 dcsignation.does decrease 12. RM(Residcnual OS-P(Open Space-Park) RM-0(Resudential Medimit Open Space-Park(OS-I') - I Medium Dcrot si Density,Oil Oycrlac) uiJac) density from 35 In 25 dNac 11. RM(Residential P(RM-15)Public'- RNI(Rcsidcntial h4ci ium Public(P) it Ntixcd lkc RMII-25 Rcsidcnlial RMIL - Mcduun Ucnsio') underlying Residential Densely) Med ( Me filth Density) Rcsidcnlial Rcsidcntial Medium Ihgh _ Medium Density 15 mdac - unlac) High Density,2S Mcdrmn high Ucnsity) Ucnsity 25 dNac 14 RNI,R-ticultal P(RM-15)Public- -RM fRcsidcnual Mcdinm Public(P) uNae 41), Conuncrcial RM-15(Residential' OP(Office Professional) Commercial General-PAR.35 Medium Density) underlying Residential Dcnsuy) Medium Density 15 uNae General Medium Density) (CG-FI) 15 IG(Industrial P(h Public-underlying 11.(Indnslnal Limited) Public(P) .11. CG(Commercial RH-30(Residential High CG(Commercial General) Conuncrcial General-FAR.35 Gcncral) Industnal __ _ General) Dcnsil,30 uNae (CG-FI) , 42. RM(Residential P(Public)-designation to CG(Commercial General) Public(P) Mcdmm Density reflect hospital i • t EXISTING QENEI(AL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMM1IISSION NO GENERAL ADVISORY - RECOMMENDATIONS NO C.F.NF.RAL ADVISORY RECOMM INS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designations to be considered PLAN COMMITTEE (Designations to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the Cit Council_ DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the City Council I!. Atixel MI I-P1-111-SP(Mixed 'Pacifica C'onuuumly Plan Mixed Use and add Specific J i. ILM(Rcsidcnlial RMH-25(11-dentual RM-RMII(Rcsidcnlial Residential Medium Density 15 Dc%clopmciit Use Horizontal,Density 1.0 - Plan(SP) Mcdium[)easily) Mcdmm high Density.25 Medium Ucnsy;Residential rhJac FAR.11)un/ac,Specific _ uNae Medium high Density) Plan - 44. RM(Residential RH-30(Residential high RM-RMH(Residential Residential Medium Density 15 17 RM(Residential P(RMH-25)Public- RMH(Residential Mediuin High Public(P)designation,increase Mcdmm Ucnsity) Density.In tin/ac) Medium Denser:Rcsidcnlial du/ac Medium Ucnsity) underlying Rcsidcntial Density) density from 15 10 25 du/ac - Mcdmm I li•h Ucnsaw l - Medium High Density 25 - 4i RM(Residential CG-FI(Commercial RM(Residential Medium Commercial General(CG-FI) uNae Nledunm Density) General,Density 0 35 FAR Density) _- Ix. RM(Residential OS Park(Open Space,Park) OS-PR(Open Space,Parks and Open Space-Park(OS-P) 46. RM(Residential RI!,-30(Residential High RM(Residcnual Mcdium Residential Mcdmm Dcnsuy 15 _ Mcdimti Dcnsily) liecrenlion) Medium Density) Dcnsil.30 tin/ac l c RN) _ _du/ac 19. RI,(Residential RM-15(Rcsidcntial -RMP(Residential Manufactured Residential Law Density 7 0 47 RM(Residential P(RI I-30)Public- RM(Resudentinl Mediums Residential Medium Dcnsil)'15 Low Density) Medium Density 15 uNae) I tome Park) dut/ae and add Mobile Iionic Mcdium Density) underlying Residential High Densiy) du/ac and add Public(P) t Park(hcrlay' ___• __- Ucnsity.30 uNoc)_ ___ 48 RNI(11csidenlial P(RII-10)Public- RM(Rcstdculial Mcdium Ncsidemial MMeduuu Ucnsity 15 21) RL(Residential P(RL-6 5)Public- RI.(Residential Low Density) Public(P)designation,retain 'Mcdium Dcnsi(y) underlying Residential I ligh Density) du/ae and add Public(P) Lou Density) underlying Residential Lou _ maximum 71)du/ae Density,30 mJac _ Dcnsu 6.5 uNae 49, RM(Residential P(RH-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Dcnsuy 15 t 21. SR(Senior RMH-25(Residential (Q)RMH(Qualified, Senior Residential to Residential Mcdtwn Density) undcrlrmg Residential I hgh Density) duac and add Public(P) Rcsidcnlial) Medium Hugh Density 25 Residential Mcdmm flight - Medium High(RMH-25) Ucnsity.3U tin/tic) _ uNae) 51) RNI(Rcsidcntial CN-FI(Commercial RN1-FP2(Rcsidcnlial MediumRcsidcnlial Medium Density _ - Medium Density) Neghborhood,Density 0.35 Density,Flmlplain) (RM-15)aiud Commcrctal 22. CG(Commercial P(CN-FH Public- CG(Commercial Ceneral) Public(11) FAR) _ Neighborhood(CN-FI General) underlying Commercial 51 CG(Commercial RM-15(Residential CG-FP2(Commercial General, Commercial 0cncral(CG-F 1) Neighborhood,Density 0 35 General) Mcdinm Density,IS must Flood lain FAR) - - - 52 RL(Residential CN-FI(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Residential Loin Dcnsily'7.0 23. Industrial- MI -FI-30-SP(Mixed M2-OI-CZ;R4-O-CZ.Cl Mixed-Use Horizontal;- Lou Ucusily) Neighborhood.FAR 0.35) - dn/ac.requested-I hsloric Report Rewurce Use Horizontal,Density 0.35 -O CZ(Industrial General,Oil recommend F2-30(5 FAR,30 - to add historic Overlay ` Production FAR,30 un/nc,Specific Oycrlay,Coastal Zone; dulac);recommend••average" 53. OS-C(Open Space RL-6.5(Residential Low LUD-CZ-FP2(Limited Use Open Space Conservation(OS- Plan) Residential High Density.Oil density of 15 du/ac Overlay,Coastal Zane: - -Consmalmn) Dcusily,6.5 uNae) District.Coastal Zane, C) _ Commercial Neighborhood,Oil _ Flood plain Oychay,Coastal Zonc) 51 RNI(Rcsidcnlial RI.-6 5/RI I-111 Alagnolia Pacific Specific Plan 1(csidenli:il Ntcdium Ucnsity 15 24 IG Industrial RM-15(Residential IG(Industrial General) Residential Low Dcnsil 7.0 Mehnm Ucusily) 6.5(Re nulae.R law Dcnsuy, Spe c dcvla nOv and add General) Medium Density,15 uNae) _. dti/ac, y C.5 utJac,Residential high Specific Plan Overlay Density,30 uNae) 2S. IG(Industrial 1-F2-H(Industrial,Density IL(Industrial Limited) add Historic Overlay - 55. RL(Rcsidcntial, RM-15(Residential RMP(Rcsidcntial Manufactured Residential Low Dcnsuy 7 11 General) 15 FAR,(Ind sari 1,Dens Loin Density) Mcdmm Density,15 uNae) Itone Park) ._ du/ac dcsignation and add _ Mobile I Ian@ Uynla 26 RI.(Residential. P(RL-6.5)Public- RL(Residential Law Density) Public(P)designation;retain s(, CGCmn RM-IS CGm Contain ercial General(CG-FI)sidenla cc il'Low Dcnsily) underlying Rcxidemml Low maximum 7,0 dua General) Medium Dcns un/ac _ dcsignation _ Density 6 5 uNae 57 CG(Commercial RH-30(Rcsidcnlial High RH(Residential High Density) Residential Mcdimti Density 15 �\ 27 RI,(Residential P(RL-6 5)Public- RI,(Residential Low Density) Public(11)dcsignation;retain General) Dcnsily,31I unite) dot/ac Low Density) underlying Residential Lm cv maximum To dula Density 6.5 uuac 28. '"ecsidcntial CN-F I(Commercial CG(Commercial Gcncral).. Commercial Neighborhood RM Residential RH-30(Residential I Ogh RH(Rcsidcnlial I ligh Density) Mcdium�_s - Medium Density) Dcnsiy',30 uNnc) my) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 (CN-FI) \ '� _ 59 CG(Commercial RMH-25(Residential CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG-FI) 29. P.Q-P.I(Public, P ,i FI)Public- PS(Public Scmi Public) Commcrctal Gcneml(CG-FI) - Quasi-Public, underlying'wnmercial and add Public(P)designation General) Medium High Density,25 Institutional) Gencml,Densily'trppR) �' _ uNae - _ -.�• 60 Planned CG-PI(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Mixcd Use and add Specific \- CommunityGeneral.Density0.35 FAR Plan Ovcrl.y Continued on next page t PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a," party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is 'a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: ` March 4, 1996 a I declare; under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 4 , 199�_ at Costa Mesa, California. Y Signature City of Huntington Beach • General Plan Update C "J Ou City Council Review Schedule HUNTINGTON BEACH January 31, 1995 The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the"constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments, please utilize the following schedule(See reverse side for more information): Study Session #1 •.-.Urban Design Element 5:00 P.M. February 26, 1996 •:•Recreation and Community Services Element ...Introduction to a General Plan -:-Historic and Cultural Resources Element .-What is a General Plan --Public Facilities and Public Services Element •:Environmental Impact Report •..Environmental Resources and Conservation Element :-Ho%v the General Plan%vas updated •..Housing Element .-.Update Schedule •:Growth Management Element Organization of the General Plan --Coastal Element --.Goal, Policy, and Objective :•Economic Development Element .-Major Recommendations of the General Plan .-.Housing Element Study Session#3 5:00 P.M. April 8, 1996 -:Growth Management Element �:Coastal Element *Review March 25, 1996, actions •Circulation Element :-Air Quality Element •: -Land Use Element -*.-Noise Element •:•Land Use Map -.-Environmental Hazards Element :-Hazardous Materials Element PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2 •:•Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. April 22, 1996 •:•Introduction ' Study Session #2 •:•Public Hearing Procedure 5:00 P.M. March 11, 1996 -le Overview .Circulation Element ..-Land Use Element -Major issues -Land Use Map :•Environmental Impact Report :•Urban Design Element Final Study Session#4 :•Historic and Cultural Resources Element 4:00 P.M. May 6, 1996 •:Recreation and Community Services Element ---Review April 22, 1996, actions :•Public Facilities and Public Services Element Outstanding Issues :•Environmental Resources and Conservation.Element •:•Review final action on the EIR s Economic Development Element --.Review final action on General Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO. 3 5:00 P.M. March 25, 1996 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 :•Overview •:Introduction •:Public Hearing Procedure :-Public Hearing Procedure -:-Environmental Impact Report :•Final action on Outstanding Issues -Air Quality Element -:Final Action on the Circulation Element :•Noise Element .--Final action on the Land Use Map •:Environmental Hazards Element -.-.Final Action on the Land Use Element •:Hazardous Materials Element -Final action on the EIR •:•Utilities Element •:Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered 92648. The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions, please call the Department be held in Room B-8, both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note: due to the amount of information, any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway, City Clerk alternate dates. In addition, scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic, time, and date, please contact 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach, CA 92648 at (714) 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 536-5227 (714) 536-5227. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1, the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted, the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation, air quality, and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council, the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. Wv 6� r City of Huntington Beach • General Plan Update �O" 'b HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Review Schedule January 31, 1995 �Y�-�W9'� The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the "constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments, please utilize the following schedule(See reverse side for more information): Study Session#1 ❖Urban Design Element 5:00 P.M. February 26, 1996 ❖Recreation and Community Services Element •:•Introduction to a General Plan ❖Historic and Cultural Resources Element --.-What is a General Plan ❖Public Facilities and Public Services Element ❖Environmental Impact Report ---Environmental Resources and Conservation Element ❖How the General Plan was updated -,-Housing Element -.--Update Schedule -Growth Management Element •:•Organization of the General Plan :•Coastal Element •:•Goal, Policy, and Objective •:•Economic Development Element •:•Major Recommendations of the General Plan -.-Housing Element Study Session#3 5:00 P.M. April 8, 1996 •:•Growth Management Element :•Coastal Element •:Review March 25, 1996, actions •:•Circulation Element •:•Air Quality Element •:•Land Use Element ❖Noise Element •:•Environmental Hazards Element -.-Land Use Map •:•Hazardous Materials Element PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2 •:•Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. April 22, 1996 •:•Introduction Study Session #2 ❖Public Hearing Procedure 5:00 P.M. March 11, 1996 ---Circulation Element •:•Overview •:•Land Use Element •:•Major issues -.--Land Use Map ❖Environmental Impact Report •:•Urban Design Element Final Study Session#4 •:•Historic and Cultural Resources Element 4:00 P.M. May 6, 1996 :•Recreation and Community Services Element ❖Review April 22, 1996, actions •:•Public Facilities and Public Services Element -.-Outstanding Issues ---Environmental Resources and Conservation Element •:•Review final action on the EIR •:•Economic Development Element -.--Review final action on General Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO. 3 5:00 P.M. March 25, 1996 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 •:Overview •:•Introduction -,-Public Hearing Procedure •:•Public Hearing Procedure •:•Environmental Impact Report ❖Final action on Outstanding Issues -.--Air Quality Element ❖Final Action on the Circulation Element .-Noise Element ❖Final action on the Land Use Map ❖Environmental Hazards Element .-.Final Action on the Land Use Element •:•Hazardous Materials Element •:•Final action on the EIR -.--Utilities Element -.-Final adoption of the General Plan I PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered 92648. The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions, please call the Department be held in Room B-8, both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note: due to the amount of information, any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway, City Clerk alternate dates. In addition, scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic, time, and date, please contact 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach, CA 92648 at (714) 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 536-5227 (714) 536-5227. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1, the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted, the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation, air quality, and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council, the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. LAW OFF11 'ffA PALMIERI, TYLER, WIENER, WILHELMLDRON A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PPOFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2603 MAIN STREET ANGELO J- PALMIERI• CYNTHIA M. WOLCOTT EAST TOWER - SUITE 1300 � P O. 80x 19712 ROBERT F_ WALDRON* JOEL P. KEW IRVINE. CA 92713-9712 ALAN H.WIENER' MICHELLE M. FUJIMOTO IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714-6228 ROBERT C- IHRKE' GARY C. WEISBERG (714) 8SI-9400 JAMES E. WILHELM* MICHAEL H. LEIFER WRITERS DIRECT DENNIS G- TYLER' ELINOR J.VOTAW DIAL NUMBER MICHAEL J. GREENE` NORMAN J. RODICH Q C1-7328 FRANK C. ROTHROCK' MICHELE D. MURPHY DENNIS W. GHAN' SCOTT R. CARPENTER 85 DAVID O. PARR' RICHARD A. SALUS C HARLE$ H. KANTER4 OOV GLA$ M. STEVENS 1 +1 TEE LCOPIER 17141 BSI-ISS4 GEORGE J- WALL O. SUSAN WIENS I, ,1{ (714) 851-3844 May 16, 1996i (714) ,57-1225 L. RICHARD RAWLS RONALD M. COLE VI 225 PATRICK A_ HEN NES$EY CYNTHIA B- PAULSEN ) (714) 951-2351 DON FISHER SEAN P O'CONNOR - - !� L` GREGORV N. WEILER SUSAN T. SAKURA ' �) WARREN A. WILLIAMS TIMOTHY S. GALUSNA JOHN R LISTER ROBYN DIMINO BRUCE W DANNEMEYER REFER TO FILE NO. .PRor"s.,..L COR.O-101 ('iTY OFFICE 16193-009 VIA HAND DELIVERY Dave Sullivan Shirley Dettloff Honorable Mayor Dave Garofalo Pete Green Ralph Bauer Tom Harman Mayor Pro Tem Vic Leipzig City Council Members CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street --: Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,T Re: Freeway Industrial Park r Ladies and Gentlemen: - As you know, on Monday, May 13, 1996, the City .Council L collectively voted to approve the General Plan Amendment for the City of Huntington Beach. In the context of the preliminary discussions regarding land use, however, Ms. Janette Ditkowsky of Freeway Industrial Park and the undersigned engaged both the City Council and Staff in a lively discussion regarding Freeway Industrial Park's real property located on the corner of Edinger and Gothard. Freeway made its plea to the City Council urging it to maintain the Commercial General designation, instead of the more restrictive Commercial Regional designation. Based on the 4 to 3 vote to alter Freeway Industrial Park's General Plan designation to Commercial Regional, and the brevity of time within which the dialogue was conducted, Freeway Industrial Park hereby respectfully requests that the Council reconsiders Freeway Industrial Park's request. It is our understanding that a Motion for Reconsideration can only be made by a City Council member and, therefore, we urge each of you to read the attached letter, previously sent, which outlines Freeway Industrial Park's position. PALMIERI. TYLER, WIENER. WILHELM & WALDRON CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH May 16, 1996 Page 2 The next opportunity for a Motion for Reconsideration will occur on the May 20, 1996 City Council Meeting. Freeway Industrial Park will be available to further discuss and amicably resolve the outstanding issues. Should you be inclined to move for reconsideration, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (714) 851-7328. Your continued consideration of this important land use issue is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours, �f l Susan T. Sakura STS/dh Enclosure cc: Janette Ditkowsky LAW OFFICES PALMIERI. TYLER, WIENER, WILHELM & WALDRON A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2603 MAIN STREET ANGELO J. PALMIERI' CYNTHIA M.WOLCOTT EAST TOWER - SUITE 1300 P. O. sox 19712 ROBERT F.WALDRON' JOEL P. KEW IRVINE, CALIFORNIA>i27M-622B IRVINE. CA 92713-9712 ALAN H.WIENER' MICHELLE M. FUJIMOTO ROBERT C. IMRKC' GARY C.WEISBERG (714) 851-0400 JAMCS E.WILNCLM' MICNAEL H. LEIFER WRITER'S DIRECT DENNIS G.TYLER' ELINOR J- VOTAW DIAL NUMBER MICHAEL J.GREENE* NORMAN J. RODICH FRANK C. ROTHROCK' MICHELE D. MURPHY (714) 8 51-7 3 2 8 DENNIS W GHAN' SCOTT R- CARPENTER DAVID D. PARR' RICHARD A.SALUS CHARLES M. KANTER* DOUGLAS M.STEVENS May 13 1996 TELECOPIER 17141 85I-I554 , GEORGE J.WALL D. SUSAN WIENS (714) 85I-3044 L. RICHARD RAWLS RONALD M. COLE PATRICK A. HENNESSEY CYNT141A B. PAULSEN f7141 737-1225 DON FISHER SEAN P. O'CONNOR (714) 8SI-23S1 GREGORY N.WEILER SUSAN T.SAKURA WARREN A. WILLIAMS TIMOTHY S. GALUSHA JOHN R. LISTER ROBYN DIMINO BRUCE W. OANNEMEYER REF6 72)4r2 Lfydbo VIA HAND DELIVERY CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Freeway Industrial Park Ladies and Gentlemen: This law firm represents Freeway Industrial Park (hereinafter referred to as "Freeway") , owners of real property located within the City of Huntington Beach at the intersection of Gothard and Edinger. More specifically, the subject property is described, as follows: Assessor's Map, Book 142, Page 51, Parcel 511, Lots 3 and 4; Book 142, Page 07, Parcel 072, Lots 8, 9 and 6; Book 142, Page 07, Parcel No. 071, Lots 65 and 66; and Book 142, Page 32, Parcel 321, Lots 5, 6, 8, 15 and 17 (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property") . 1. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The City of Huntington Beach, through its Planning Commission and City Council (hereinafter collectively referred to as "City") , intends on changing the general plan designation for certain parcels of the Subject Property from "Commercial General" to "Commercial Regional". The Commercial Regional designation will be an adverse and significant impact upon the Subject Property in that it severely hinders Freeway's ability to attract and obtain valuable tenants, develop its real property to its PALMIERI, TYLER,WIENER. WILHELM &WALDRON Planning Commission May 13, 1996 Page 2 highest and best use, and freely own real property without harsh governmental intervention. 2. LONG-STANDING COMMITMENT TO ECONOMIC GROWTH Freeway Industrial Park has been dedicated and continues to be dedicated to positive development and growth in the City of Huntington Beach. Indeed, in the last four years, Freeway has invested $3. 3 million in the redevelopment and renovation of its properties in Huntington Beach. Attached as Exhibit "A" hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein is a copy of the letter dated November 3, 1995 from Janette T. Ditkowsky, Chief Operating Officer of Freeway to the City Council describing further Freeway's dedication to the community. To the extent that the General Plan Amendment is utilized to encourage economic growth, Freeway is not opposed to the City's overall goals. However, in the context of this deep and historical commitment to the City of Huntington Beach and to economic growth for local citizens and the City as a whole, Freeway provides the following challenges to the proposed General Plan Amendment. 3. THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ADVERSELY AND UNFAIRLY IMPACTS FREEWAY'S REAL PROPERTY. Without any just compensation or consideration, the City seeks to take an interest in real property from Freeway by significantly limiting the land uses available to Freeway. Having suffered through the decline in the real estate market, Freeway has experienced difficulty in maintaining a high occupancy rate on the Subject Property. City's proposal will hamper Freeway's ability to maintain a high occupancy rate and will heighten the chances of economic decline for one of the City's major commercial retailers. Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record that withdrawing the Commercial General designation over the Subject Property will result in economic decline. Freeway has historically been a successful land developer, which of course benefits the City as a whole. Placing such a difficult hurdle on the managers of the Subject Property can result in no good for either Freeway or the City. Such likely economic decline should the General Plan Amendment be approved as drafted is anathema to the goals of the General Plan Amendment and of the City. Freeway therefore respectfully requests that the City maintain the Commercial PALMIERI.TYLER. WIENER. WILHELM &WALDRON Planning Commission May 13 , 1996 Page 3 General designation for the Subject Property and withdraw the proposal for a Commercial Regional designation. 4. MOREOVER, THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS INADEQUATE TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE GENERAL PLAN. As an additional basis for Freeway's objection to the General Plan Amendment, a careful review of the Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") , which was prepared to support the approval of the General Plan Amendment, is inadequate. The EIR is insufficient for the following reasons: the project description is inadequate; technical studies relied upon by the City are faulty; the City and its Staff fail to evaluate the cumulative impact of the General Plan Amendment; the EIR improperly defers the evaluation of traffic studies for a later time; and restricting land uses violates both the spirit and dictates of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA, " Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq. ) and CEQA Guidelines. Freeway also incorporates the specific comments provided by Mr. Tom Ryan, Chairperson of the City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board, to Ms. Linda Niles, Senior Planner, in his correspondence dated January 14, 1996. Freeway submits this challenge without waiving its right to provide further comments on the EIR. Freeway thereby objects to the insufficient EIR prepared to support an overbroad and improper General Plan Amendment, and requests that the City re-evaluate both the EIR and the draft General Plan Amendment, which are both rife with ambiguities and inconsistencies. S. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing opposition, Freeway respectfully requests that the City resubmit the EIR and the draft General Plan Amendment to City Staff, and, at the very least, instruct Staff to maintain the Commercial General designation with regard to the Subject Property. Ve truly I s, ,l Susan T. Sakura STS:pb cc: Ms. Janette Ditkowsky Freeway Industrial Park 2032 La Colin& Drive Santa Ana, California 92705 November 3, 1995 City of Huntington Beach City Council Members 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear City Council Members, As a result of applying for the approval of E2 Lube's conditional use permit for the northeast corner of Gothard and Edinger, it is evident that Freeway Industrial Park needs to introduce itself and let you know what Freeway Industrial Park's interest is in this part of Huntington Beach. The founders of Freeway Industrial Park John A. and Norma Lorbeer Murdy, were both alumni of Huntington Beach High School. They began farming in Huntington Beach in 1922. John Murdy was active in professional groups and was the president of the Smoltzer Lima Bean Growers Association, whose bean warehouse was located at Edinger and the train tracks, and the California Lima Bean Growers Association. He served as the first president of Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian for seventeen years. In 1952, he was elected to the California State Senate by winning both the Republican and the Democratic nominations in the rimary. He represented Orange County in the Senate until 1964. .he site of the family homestead on Heil Avenue was donated -to the Wintereburq Community Methodist Church. The Murdy family also donated to the City of Huntington Beach the land at Goldenwest between Heil and Warner for Murdy Community Park. Freeway Industrial Park (*Freeway") was incorporated in 1960 with the purpose of developing some of the land which John Murdy farmed. The twelve properties that Freeway now owns in Huntington Reach are shown on the attached map and complete listing of the properties. After John A. Murdy, Jr. 's retirement, the company was run by his son, Jack Murdy, until his death in 1991. Maxine Murdy Trotter, daughter of the company's founders, is currently president. I serve as Chief operating officer and am the third generation of the family to run the corporation. Maxine Trotter has many years of involvement with the Corporation, and became President in January 1991. I have an MBA in finance from Northwestern University's Kellogg Graduate School of Management, and joined the company in September 1991. City Council Members November 3, 1995 Page 2 of 3 Freeway Industrial Park is committed to Huntington Beach and has demonstrated this commitment for over thirty-five years by investing in the redevelopment and upgrade of the properties it owns. For example, during the past four years, Freeway Industrial Park has: - purchased the leasehold interest in Huntington Furnishings Mart at 7225-7227 Edinger Avenue from the RTC and undertook a major remodel after signing the lease with the anchor tenant. This shopping center was at less than 304; i occupancy when PIP acquired t and is now at almost 100% occupancy; - completely overhauled two industrial properties on Murdy Circle, re-leasing them to six industrial tenants; - participated financially in the remodeling of two restaurants: CoCols, on the northwest corner of Edinger and Gothard Rosalynn's Restaurant at 7402 Edinger Avenue) The investment in the above activities, aloe? with the routine repairs and maintenance, has totaled $3.3 million over the last four years. Now Freeway Industrial Park is attempting to redevelop a former gas station parcel at the northeast corner of Edinger and Gothard, with EZ Lube as the new tenant. Freeway is committed to spend $300,000 on EZ Lube's building, with EZ Lube investing another $200,000 of its money. In agreeing to this lease with EZ Lube, Freeway looked at the lone-term potential for this corner and for the Levitz property behind it. Levitz holds a ground lease which has twenty-six years remaining. Only when that lease expires will Freeway have the opportunity to redevelop that parcel. In the meantime, EZ Lube is an attractive use which will enhance the aesthetics of the corner, will generate sales and property tax revenues for the city and rental income for Freeway, and may encourage other tenants to consider the Edinger Corridor. City Council Members November 3, 1995 Page 3 of 3 As an aside, the recently issued Edinger Corridor Economic Market Study talks about the importance of the Edinger Corridor to the city's financial viability, and discusses ways that the city can help to revitalize this area. The report also includes the following statement: "Of equal or greater importance to maintaining the financial y viabilit of the Project Area however, is the need to ggensrateprivate real estate investment. This will result in the expansion of the property tax base, and hence, incremental revenues accruing to the Agency which can be used for redevelopment purposes." (page 14 - italics mine) Freeway Industrial Park has been working and investing in this part of Huntington Beach for over thirty-five years, with no help or incentives from the city. At thin- point, we ask your approval of the EZ Lube conditional use permit so that we can continue to invest in a way that will benefit all of the parties involved: Freeway Industrial Park, EZ Luba, the surrounding businesses, and the City of Huntington Beach. Yours truly, lz:::�JOanette Trotter Ditkowsky Chief Operating Officer -7 a 1 Parcel Nos. Of. CM cc ` ffr•� MR MM :G NMI ` 1i%g BOB �C 'z 2 � ayl�tr � ■/1 MIM � �� ``111111f •�finff f■ ■ ll �� C 11i1l1� �� frffffn��►fi u/�� �/r iftr�� sun-all a: aR ,1111111U E�COMA gap =6=: : C C: ( III Eli � ` M , Rat :�_ 1�tlii� � �►!�i�� �i Nos. I Elti�il�n!lulu I I��II "r�ti�rall Ilittlllllll�I�ll��tllllllllnl Oc,..` Tirru � i t u��w �1Aff�Uu--• s�u�..0 +.w. PUBLIC MICES PUBLIC NOTICES P i66iy NOTICES— � PUBLIC NOTICES F_ 0 , 0 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update NUNTINGTONBEACH City Council Review Schedule The City of I luntington Beach is ir,toe process of rewriting the General Platt. The General Plan is the"constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. Thesc policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments,please utilize the following schedule(See reverse side for more information): Study Session#1 FINAL PUBLIC HF,ARiNG NO.3 field February 26,1996 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 •:•Recognition of General Plan Advisory Study Session 02 Committee and Planning Commission Held March 11, 1996 •:•Introduction •:•Public Hearing Procedure PUBLIC HEARING NO. I •'-Final action on Outstanding issues Held March 25,1996 0-Final Action on the Circulation Element •:•Final action on the Land Use Map Study Session 93 0-Final Action on the Land Use Element Held April 8, 1996 -*-Final action on the EiR -'-Final adoption of the Crcncral Plan PUBLiC HEARING NO.2 fleld April 22,1996 Final Study Session#4 held May 6,1996 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Bearings and Study Sessions w•il!be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic.Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered 92648 The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at,or prior to the public hearing If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions,please call the Department be held in Room B-8,both located in the lower level' of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note due to the amount of information,any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway,City Clerk alternate dates. In addition,scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates- To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic,time,and date,please contact 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach,CA 92648 at(714)536-5271 or the Office of t-ie City Clerk at (714)536-5227 (714)536-5227. ALI.INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on F attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HB'TV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental impact Report- If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you NOTICE• IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and,therefore,an Environmental Impact Report was warranted- Environmental impact Report No.94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271 In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No.94-1,the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, Mitigation Measures are eolicies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts- if adopted,the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation,air quality,and noise environmental issue areas. III HASE BE ADVISED that upon firal adoption by the City Council,the portions or the General Plan tha• are ,:ithin the coastal zone must be o_rti6ed by the California Coastal Commission The cerification prrcc,�vi;' bcvin with a local Coastal Progiam Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for rc%lc,% ani appmal I he submittal and ar,•roval mad cceur approximately six months to (INC year after Cit-. (w.uxli adoption f- I1 01"1 ltunr rnrrtor. �, .rrh-"� ; .-nir �l ir`•; ncirr,(�w?nor ...�y �, 141L. PUBLIC NOTICES PUB IC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES Loan: 1009001 Other:51808-5 express or implied, regarding NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE Instr.No.96-17141n Book'Page . File:51421 JO a p.n. -78-034- Dtle, possession, or encum- T S. No.G229394 Unit CodeG of Official Records In the office 49 Nonce of Trustee's Sale brances,to sabsty the indebted- Loan No.5007138/JACKSON of the recorder of Orange- Lnder Deed of Trust You are in ness secured by said deed. API 148-D43-31-50-10 County; Said Sale of property dafault under a deed of trust advances thereunder, with 'COMMONWEALTH TRUST will be made In'as Is'condition dated April 6. 1994.unless you interest as provided therein,and DEED SERVICES, INC'as duty without covenant or 'warranty, lake action to protect your me unpaid isecperredpal balance said deed appointed Trustee under the express or Implied, regarding property, it may be sold at a Y following described Deed of bile possession, or encum- public sale. it you need an with interest thereon as provided Trust WILL SELL AT PUBLIC brances,to Q explanation of the nature 01 the ,n said note. fees.charges and AUCTION TO THE HIGHEST principal sum�ofmthe none s proceedingagainst you. you expenses of the trustee and the ( 1 9 Y Y, BIDDER FOR CASH (In the secured by said Deed of Trust, should contact a lawyer. Notice trusts created by said deed of forms which are lawful tender with' Interest as In said note is hereby given that BEC Trust trust dated: 0426/1996 BEC In the United States and/or the Deed Service.A Delaware Cdrpc- Trust Deed Service, as said ) provided, advances. if any, ration.as trustee. or successor trustee 140 E Commonwealth t ashier's, certified or other under the terms of said Deed' trustee. or substituted trustee checks specified In' Civil Code of Trust, fees. char Ave. Suite 202 Fullerton. CA gas and pursuant to the deed of trust 92632 (714) 773-0800 Br Section 292 (payable In lull at expenses of the Trustee and of eilecufed by Jack S. Cialabian Joanne S Herman Trustee sae m sae time of sale to T.D Service the trusts created by said Deed aril Harlene Chalabian.husband officer P7759952.5i9.5/16/96 Company) all right• title and of Trust.Said sale will be held aril wife as joint tenants re- interest conveyed to and now on 'May 15, 1996, at 3:00 held by it under said' Deed of corded on 04n4n994 as in. PUBLIC NOTICE p m on the front steps to the Trust In the propertyhereinafter sc'ument no 94-0260103 inentrance of the Orange Chile book page of official records in Loan: 6886170 Other 623226 described: TRUST OR: DENNIS Center. 300 E Chapman or_ M..,office of the county recorder File pl2460 A P Number 937- JACKSON IRMA JACKSON ange, CA' 'At the time of the 15-006 Nonce Of Trustee's Sale VELMA P JACKSON of Orange county, California. under Deed Of Trust you are in Initial publication of mh notice, th Y BENEFICIARY: DUALITY and pursuant to a nonce of default under a Deed Of Trust. the total amount of me'unpaid MORTGAGE USA, INC.' default and election to sell dated April t0.t990.unless you balance of the obligation se- thereunder recorded y 'RecordedFeDruary 24,1994 as cured b the above described O1/26/1996 in book.page -as lake action to protect your Instr- No. 94-134190[n Book' 9 property. it may be sold at a Deed o Trust and `estimated instrument no 96.39641 of said of a of Official Records in the public sale. It you need an 9 costs,expenses,and advances official records, will set] on explanation of the nature of the office of the Recorder of Or. Is $190,882.67' It Is possible 0523/1996 at in The Font Of angeCounty;said Deed of Trust The Fla poles At The Main Entry proceeding against you. you describes the following prop- that at the time of sale the Area poles The The Mai Civic Should contact a lawyer. Nonce arty:Lot 15 and a portion of Lot opening Did may be less man Center 401-411 E. Chapman 's hereby given that Lender 14 In Block B of Tract no.876. the total indebtedness due. Service Bureau. A California Date 4/12/96 COMMON- Ave.Placentia.CA at t0-00 am corporation, as Trustee, or as shown on a map recorded in WEALTH TRUST DEED SERV- at.)ubfic auction.to the-iighest successor trustee.or substituted book 26,page 36 of miscellane- ICES, INC.' 'as said Trustee' bidder for cash (payable at the trustee pursuant to the Deed Of ous maps, records of Orange Ten Heard,Assistant Secretary' time of sate in lawful money of Trust executed by Annette County.California,more parbcu- '1750 E.41h St-.Ste 700.Santa the United States). all right.title Rasmussen, an unmarried larly described as follows: Ana.CA 92705'(714)543-8372 and interest. conveyed 'o and woman recorded on 0420/1990 Parcel 13 as shown on a map We are assisting the Beneficiary now held by it under said deed as instrument No 90-206983 in filed 11 book 21. page 2 of 10 collect a debt and any Infor- of'rust in the property situated book page of official records in Parcel maps,records of Orange mation we obtain will be used IT said county and state here- the office of the County Re- County. California. Excepting for that purpose whether re- matter described As more fully corder of Orange County. Cali- therefrom,all minerals,oil,gas, calved orally or In writing 'IF described on said deed of trust fornia. and pursuant to the petroleum and other hydrocar- AVAILABLE. THE EXPECTED he Deed of trust encumbers Notice Of Default and e'ect:on 10 bon substances In or under or OPENING 010 MAY BE OB- ra,n property more particu- sell '^ereurcer recoroed which may be produced from TAINED BY CALLING THE ail} described there,r (the ClIC211996 i2 book .page .as said land which underlies a FOLLOWING' TELEPHONE Trust property') and that the Instrument No 96-1331 of said plane parallel to and 4.500 feet BE- beneficiary hereby elects to official records. vnll sell On below the present surface of NUMBERS ON THE DAY BE- conduct a untied foreclosure 050/1996 at The Fro.^; O' said land, for the purpose of FORE THE SALE (714)480- sale pursuant to the prdtis'ons The Flarpcies At The Main Ent P p 5690 TAC 426572c PUB 4-25. 01 ;purse a .o the pro Code ry prospe,ting for,the exploration, 5-2.5 9 Area o The Placentia Civic section 9501 fa) (a) fill and to development, production. Center a01-aft E- Chapman extraction and [akin of said Include in the r.on]udicia, fare- 9 PUBLIC NOTICE Ave Placentia 'to 10 00 gh at mineras. oil, as. closure of the estate described g petroleum public auction to the r.:grest and other hydrocarbon sub. TRUSTEE NO. T-26714- n Lhis ^Oboe 0f dale ,: anC bidder Icr cash (payable at the Y e!ec on to sea under eeec of r stances from sold land by NO 27 LLY-GALL ICE OF LOAN trus:a:i of the personal property Meunn of sale at s) al money c mews of mines,wells,derricks NO 2733072 NOTICE OF TRUS and fixtures described ir, the the United States) all right.nil and/or other equipment from TEE'S SALE YOU ARE IN DE- ar.d merest conveyed a and , deco o! [rust. security g!ee- no•w he'd b nder sa'd deed o, r.9i locations on zdiairing FAULT UNDER A CEED OF en! ara , a1 other rsru- r d neighboring land or ly;ng TRUST DATED 2/7189 UNLESS Iments n iavcr y f Bene'cia. of!'us;'r the property s: oleo ouls;ce of the above described YOU TAKE ACTION TO PROTECT Benf liciary reserves":e rgh[o 'n sa;d county and sate ^.ere land. It being understood that YOUR PROPERTY, IT MAY BE wafter described As mare .'uly g evoke+�election as to some or the owner of such minera;s.all. SOl D AT A PUBt IC SALE 'F described on sa-d Deed Ot'r,st ail all sad pe social p'ooerry ;he property address and over gas. penc:eum and othe hy. YOU NEED AN EXP:RNA"ION and/or fixtures. or to add acdi• common designabon.If any of drocarbon substances. as set OF THE NATURE OF THE PRO- tiorzl personal prpper°r andldr the real pra-ery Cescr.ced !orth above,shall have no right CEEDING AGAINST YOU. YOU Rxtu as to the election rere!r above is purported to be 7801 to enter upon the surface of the SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER expr;ssed. at beneficiary s sole Sailboat Cir N.jrtlngtor Beach above described land nor to use On THURSDAY.MAY 16. 1996. elector,. from U-ne to time and Ca 92648 'r•e unders,g-ed ary e1 the said land or any 'at 1000 AM First commercial at any U,ne until the cdrsurrrha- Trustee C.sc!a.ms any Fabl!,y to POftm^lhereol above said plane Mortgage Company,DBA FCMC !ion of Me trustee s sale 10 Ile any incorrectness of t^e prop- parallel to and 4,500 feet below Mortgage Company, as duly conducted pursuant to the deed erty address and other common the present surface of the said appointed Trustee, by Substitu- ) of tra st and this iatce at default designation. I any, shown land io! any purpose whatso- von, under a Deed of Trust and alecton to sell under deed herein Tre total arr.ount of tie ever, as reserved by M-M dated 2!7/89 signed by JUNE of trust.trs notice evidences a Unpaid balance c'"he ebllga:ie.r. McCalleni Realty Syndicate, a KELLY.A SINGLE WOMAN AND stretch;line of credit TttlS ,oan secured by the property to be Dissolved Partnership, and TANYA GALLAGHER, AN UN- was subsequently modified by sold and reasonable estimated McCallen Realty Syndicate, a MARRIED WOMAN and re- Imose certain unreccrde0 Costs expenses and advances at Dissolved Partnership,of which corded 2114189. as Document Change in terms agreements ;he Dme of the Initial publicaton Marcus M McCallen. Jr. and 89-076673 Book----,Page datec August 2E,1993 April 6. 0! the Notice Of Sale S William H_H. McCallen are co- of the Official Records of OR• 1994 June 30, '994 August 3, $203.917 87 Ir addition to cast:. executors under the will of ANGE County.California.will sell lald7r(ss 1994. January 14, 1995 and the trustee will accept a Cashier's Marcus M.McCallen,deceased, at public auction to the hlghe,�.31, 1995. The property check drawn on a State 0r last surviving Partner of said bidder for cash in United States and other common NaDonal Bank a check drawn by partnership, In the deed re- Dollars. IN FRONT OF THE (designation, it any, of the real a State or Federal Credit Union corded October 10. 1968 In FLAGPOLES AT THE MAIN property described above is or a CheCK drawn by a State Or book 8748,paga 449 of official ENTRANCE TO THE PLACENTIA purported to be: 16245 Way- Federal Savings and Loan Assn- records.YOU ARE IN DEFAULT CIVIC CENTER, 401-411 E Parer Lane Huntington Beach,Ca ciatlon. Savings Association or UNDER A DEED OF TRUST CHAPMAN AVE.,IN THE CITY OF 92649 The undersigned trustee Savings Bank Specified in sec- DATED 1/19194 UNLESS YOU PLACENTIA. ORANGE County disclaims any liability for any Don 5102 of the Financial Code TAKE ACTION TO 'PROTECT California. all rlght. five and ,ncortecfness of the property and authorized to do business in YOUR PROPERTY, IT MAY BE Interest conveyed to and now disclaims and other common this state In the event tender SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE IF held by It under the Deed of klesignaficn, if any, shown other man cash is accepted the YOU NEED AN EXPLANATION' Trust, in the real property, de- ereir-The total amount of the trustee may withhold the issu- -OF THE NATURE OF THE PRO- scribed as. PARCEL 1: AN npaii balance of the obligation ance of the Trustee's Deed until CEEDING AGAINST YOU, YOU UNDIVIDED 1/42NO INTEREST ecun!d by the property to be funds become available to the SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER' IN AND TO LOT 2 OF TRACT NO old .and reasonable estimated payee or endorsee as a matter of acts,expenses and advances at right Said sale will be made,but '8492 HILLHEAD DRIVE, 11104,IN THE CITY OF HUNT- e brie of the initial publication without covenant or warranty. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA.. INGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF f tie nonce of sale is: express or implied, regarding 92646-6910' -(If a street ad- ORANGE. STATE OF CALIFOR- 2.183.140.68 In addition to tii possession, or encum- dress or common designation NIA. AS SHOWN ON A MAP It. the trustee will accept a brances.to sabsty the indebted- of property Is shown above.no RECORDED IN BOOK 487. shier's check drawn on a state ness secured by said deed, warranty' Is given as to its PAGES 35 AND 36.OF MISCEL- r natonal bank.a check drawn advances thereunder, with completeness or correctness)' LANEOUS MAPS.IN THE OFFICE y a s ate or federal credit union interest as provided therein,and The beneficiary under said Deed OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF r a check drawn by state or the unpaid principal balance of 'of Trust,by reason of a breach SAID COUNTY.EXCEPT THERE- e0era savings and (oan asso- the note secured by said deed or default In the obligations FROM ALL OiL.GAS.MINERALS iabon, savings association or with interest thereon as provided secured thereby; heretofore AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS• avings bank specified in section in said note. fees• charges and executed and delivered to the BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET. 102 )1 the Financial Code and expenses of me trustee and the undersigned a written Declara- WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SUR- uthorized to do business in this trusts created byy said deed of bon of'Default and Demand for FACE ENTRY,AS RESERVED IN ;tale n the event tender other trust.dated:04/25/1996 Lender Sale, and written notice of INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD han cash is accepted.the trus- Service Bureau, as said Trus- default and of election to cause' EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL .e may wrthhold the issuance of fee A California corporation 'the undersigned to sell said WATER AND SUBSURFACE he trLStee'S deed until funds 19800 Macarmur Blvd Suite property !o Sa"said obliga- WATER RIGHTS, BELOW A iecoma available to the payee or #970 Irvine. CA 92715-2421 bons, and thereafter' toe un- DEPTH OF 500 FEET,WITHOUT ndorsee as a matter of right. ((714) 442-2850 by: Vicki R. dersigned caused said notice of THE RIGHT OF SURFACE EN- ;aid sale will be made, but Molitz Senior Service officer default and of election to be TRY, AS DEDICATED OR RE- rimout covenant or warranty, P77579 5/2.5l9.5/16196 'RecordedJanuary 2 1996 as I SERVED IN INSTRUMENTS OF PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was. printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: May 9 , 1996 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 9, 1996 at Costa Mesa, California. Signatur r - - -- -- PUBLIC-mii...Zi; PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES, IUBLIC NOTICES City of Huntington Beach _General Plan Update HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Review Schedule The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan I is the"constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These I policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General I Plan update or wish to make public comments,please utilize the following schedule(SU reverse side for more information): j I I I I Study Session#1 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO.3 Held February 26,1996 5:00 P.M. May 13,1996 ❖Recognition of General Plan Advisory Study Session 92 Committee and Planting Commission Held March 11,1996 ❖Introduction ❖Public Hearing Procedure PUBLIC HEARING NO.1 •:•Final action on Outstanding Issues Held March 25,1996 •:•Final Action on the Circulation Element ❖Final action on the Land Use Map Study Session#3 •:•Final Action on the Land Use Element Held April 8,1996 -*•Final action on the EIR ❖Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO.2 Held April 22,1996 Final Study Session 94 I Held May 6,1996 j I ; PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or j in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered 92648. The Public hearings will be held in the to the City at,or prior to the public hearing If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions,,please call the Department ! be held in Room B-8,both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer ( of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written I communications to the City Clerk: Please Note:due to the amount of information,any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway,City"Clerk ' alternate dates. In addition,scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic,time,and date,please contact 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach,CA 926-48 ` at(714)536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at -(714)536-5217 (714)536-5227, ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HB'TV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. 'It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and,therefore,an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No.94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No.94-1,the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted,the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental 'Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts.in the transportation and circulation,air quality,and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council,the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. .Published lluntinciton Reach—Fountain Valley Independent May 9, 1996. �.-..+�z•.r•F' 5 {BPp irirplted, reaarairo NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE Instr.No.96 17141n Book'Page e: 51421 JO a.p.n. 178 n34 the P ssession or nr lm- T S o.G229394 'Unit CodeG of Official Records In the office t9 Notice of Trustee's Sale trances o satisfy the InLeu- :- Loan No.500,138/JACKSON o1 the recorder of Oran e- � Jnder Deed of Trust You are in ness secured ^y Said 3ze2 API 148-043-31-50-10 g County; Said Sale of property letault under a deed of trust ad'.ance; :hereunder, wits 'COMFdONVJEALTH TRUST will be made In'as is'condition fated April 6, 1994.unless you interest as provided thereii.and DEED SERVICES. INC'as duly without covenant or 'warranty, ake action to protect your the unpaid principal balar;e of appointed Trustee under the express or Implied, regarding uOperty, it may be sold at a the rote secured by said deed following described Deed of title possession, or encum- )ublic sale. It you need an with interest thereon as provided Trust WILL SELL AT PUBLIC brances,to pay''the remaining explanation of the nature of the in said note. tees,cnarges and AUCTION TO THE HIGHEST principal sum of the note(s) )roceedin against you. you expenses of the trustee and the 9 9 Y Y. BIDDER FOR CASH (in the secured by said Deed of Trust, lawyer gusts created b said deed of arms which are lawful tender with' 'interest as in said note ihoWd contact a la er Notice �' ! I hereb given that BEC Trust rust dated /26/1996 BEC } 9 'in the United States)and/or the provided, advances, if an Deed Service,A Delaware Corpo- Trust Deed Service, as said cashier's, certified or other under the terms of said Deed' 'ation.as trustee. or successor trustee 140 E. Comrnonw.afth checks specified in' Civil Code rustee or substituted trustee Ave. Suite 202 Fullerton. •A ex Trust, fees, charges and )ursuant to the deed of trust Q2632 ; of sale 714) 773-0800 By: Section 2 (payable in lull at expenses of the Trustee and O1 executed by Jack S. Chalabian Joanne S Herman Trustee sate the time of sale to T.O. Service the trusts created by'said Deed find Harlene Chalabian,husband officer P77589 5/2.5/9.5/16N36 Company) all right, title and of Trust. Said sale will be held interest conveyed to and now on: Ma 15, 1996, at 3:00 end wife as joint tenants re- held b it under said' Deed of y �rded on 04/14/1994 as in- PUBLIC NOTICE y p.m.on the front steps to the Trust In the proper tyty hereinafter entrance of the Oran ;trument no. 94-0260103 in Loan: 6886170 Other: 623226 described: TRUSTOR: DENNIS m Or- took page of official records in File:p12460.A P.Number 937- JACKSON IRMA JACKSON Center, ' ' E. Chapman the he office of the county recorder 15-006 Notice Of Trustee's Sale VELMA P. JACKSON ange, ub 'At me time of the it.Orange county, California. under Deed Of Trust you are in Initial publication of this notice, ad pursuant to t e notice of Y 'BENEFICIARY DUALITY the total amount of the'unpaid default under a Deed Ot Trust. MORTGAGE USA, INC' letault and election to sell dated April 10.1990.unless you balance of the obligation se- hereunder recorded p 'Recorded 9 February 24,1994 k' cured b the above described 11/26/1996 in book . page . as pro action a protect your Instr. No. 94 1341901n Book' Y property, i[ may be sold at a Deed of Trust and 'estimated istrument no.96-39041 of said page of Official Records In the public safe. if you need he office of the Recorder of Or- costs, expenses,and advances �niCial records. will sell on explanation of the nature of the Is $190,882.67' It is possible 5/23/1996 at In The Front Of angeCounty;said Deed of Trust proceeding against you, you that at the time of sale the he Flagpoles At The Main Entry describes the following prop- ? should contact a faker. Notice opening bid may be less than des o The Placentia Civic is hereby given that Lender erty:Lot 15 and a portion of Lot the total indebtedness due. ;enter 401-411 E. Chapman Service Bureau. A California 14 in Block B of Tract no.876, •Date:4/12r96 COMMON- are.Placentia.CA at 10:00 am as shown on a map recorded in corporation, as Trustee. or WEALTH TRUST DEED SERV- t public auction.to the highest successor trustee.or substituted book 26,page 36 of miscellane- ICES, INC' 'as said Trustee' odder for cash (payable at the trustee pursuant to the Deed Of ous maps, records of Orange Teri Heard,Assistant Secretary' me of sale in lawful money of Trust executes by Annette County California,more particu- •1750 E.4M St.,Ste 700,Santa is United States), all right,title Rasmussen. an unmarried larly described as follows: Ana,CA 92705'(714)543.8372 nd interest, conveyed to and woman recorded on 04/20/1990 Parcel 13 as shown on a map We are assisting the Beneficiary ow held by it under said deed as Instrument No.90-206983 in filed in book 21, page 2 of to collect a debt and any infor- d trust in the property situated book page of official records in Parcel maps,records of Orange mation we.obtain will be used i said county and state here- the office of the County Re- County, California. Excepting for that purpose whether re- iafter described As more fully corder of Orange County Cali- therefrom,all minerals,oil,gas, ceived orally or in writing. 'IF escribed on said deed of trust fornia. and pursuant to the petroleum and other hydrocar- AVAILABLE, THE EXPECTED 'he Deed of trust encumbers Notice Of Default and electon to bon substances In or under or OPENING BID MAY BE OB- srtain property more particu- sell tr,ereunaer recoroed which may be produced from TAINED BY CALLING THE 3rly descnoed therein (the 01/02.,1996 in LOOK . page ,as said land which underlies a FOLLOWING' TELEPHONE Trust property') and that the Instrument No 96-1331 of said plane parallel to and 4.500 feet NUMBERS ON THE DAY BE- ieneficiary hereby elects to Official records. will sell on below the present surface of FORE THE SALE: 714 480- onduct a unified foreclosure 05,2311996 at !^ The Front C! said land. for.the purpose of ale pursuant to the provisions The Fla olds At The Main Entry r p p 5-2. TAG.426572c PUB:4.25, it.California Commercial COda p ry development, for,the exploration, 5.2 5_g ection 9501 (4) (a) (ii) and to Area O The Placentia Civic development, production. tciude mine non!udicial tare- Center +Q1-411 Chapmna extraction and taking of said PUBLIC NOTICE t the estate described Ave.Placentia CA at 10:00 am at minerals. Oil, gas. petroleum losure O r this Ilhetice default and public auction to the nighest and other hydrocarbon sub- TRUSTEE NO. T-26714- bidder for casa +.Payable at the stances from said land by BCV/KELLY-GALLAGHER LOAN fiction to sell under aced ct time of sale In lawful money of means of mires welts,derricks NO 2733072 NOTICE OF TRUS- ust all of the Personal property the Uniteo States), all rgn.t.title ar:d;or ether Pouf ment from TEE'S SALE YOU ARE IN DE- nd fixtures lescribed m ,he - p and interest c under e r s .c ea surface fdcatidcs On adjoining FAULT UNDER A DEED OF soil of trust. security agree- I 9 r,ov✓held fl under said geed. rent and ate✓ Other ;,! ., or net � �n 5 a1d cr lying TRUST DATED 2/7/89 UNLESS rents m favor 5 nP a t'trust r t ewe `: s YOU TAKE ACTION TO PROTECT i e is de r^ aOO e described n saidcur. a staff-, f „ t YOUR PROPERTY. IT MAY BE enehcia rCSE=4eS :� rl.h 'he 9 understood Ina. �/ y patter > Nc u ✓ evoke its e e ado as to some the m nfrz!s oil SC AT A PUBLIC SAE IF I of saw versonai das�rc n s d d O ,- c Gnu NEED EXPLANATION proper; The property a.dreSs a:o Other gas, Giher by J� t: AN EXPLAvA.I .f idlor fixtures. or to add acidi- common designation. it any c' drocarbon substances, as set OF THE NATURE OF THE PRO- mal personal property and'c' the reai prc•oert Jasy-.nE, forth atwe,stiall have no right CEEDING AGAINST YOU. YOU ttures to the election herein above is Ouroorted tc �e -80, to enter upon the surface of the SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER. tpressed, at beneficiary s sole Sailboat Cir Hurt;^^'on Eeach. above described land nor to use On THURSD.AY,MAY 16, 1996, ection,from time to time and Ca 9264e he underSigseO any tit the said land or any at 10:00 AM First Commercial any time until the consumma- Trustee d!sclai:m any liabi'rty for portion thereof above said plane Mortgage Company.DBA FCMC m of the trustees sale to be any incorrectress c' the prop- parole!to and 4.500 feet below Mortgage Company, as duly inducted pursuant to the deed erty address aria D rer commor: the present surface of the said appointed Trustee,by Substitu- trustand this notice of default designation. any, shc:m land for any purpose whatso- tion, under a Deed of Trust id election to sell under deed herein. "he ICrai amount of tha ever, as reserved by M.M dated 2/7/89 signed by JUNE trust.this notice evidences a unpaid balance of tee obligation McCalien Realty Syndicate, a KELLY,A SINGLE WOMAN AND might line of credit. This loan secured bV the property tc ce Dissolved Partnership, and TANYA GALLAGHER, AN UN- is subsequently modified by sold and reasonable estimated McCalien Realty Syndicate, a MARRIED WOMAN and re- DSe certain unrecorded costs.expenses and advances at Dissolved Partnership.of which corded 2114189. as Document (ange in terms agreements the time of the initial publication Marcus M. McCalien, Jr. and 89-076673 Book--- Page----. ited August 26, 1993 April 6. Of the Notcz Of Sale s William H.N. McCalien are co- of the Official Records of OR- 194 June 30, 1994 August 3. S20;917 87 In addition to cash. executors under the will of ANGE County,California.will sell 194, January 14. 1995 and the trustee wit!accept a cashier s Marcus M.McCalien,deceased, at public auction to the highest ay 31. 1995. The property check drawn on a State or last surviving Partner of said bidder for cash In United States dress and other common National Bank.a check drawn by partnership, in the deed re- Dollars, IN FRONT- OF THE isigna'on, it any, of the real a State or Federal Credit Union corded October 10. 1968 in FLAGPOLES AT THE MAIN operty described above is or a check drawn by a State or book B748,page 449 of official ENTRANCE TO THE PLACENTIA reported to be: 16245 Way- Federal Savings and Loan AssO- records.YOU ARE IN DEFAULT CIVIC CENTER, 401-411 E. rer Lane Huntington Beach. a ciation. Savings Association or UNDER A DEED OF TRUST CHAPMAN AVE.,IN THE CITY OF !649 The undersigned trustee Savings Bank Specified in sec- DATED 1/19/94.UNLESS YOU PLACENTIA, ORANGE County, sclaims any liability for any lion 5102 Of the Financial Code TAKE ACTION TO 'PROTECT California. all rr'ght. title and "orrectness of the property and authorized to do business in YOUR PROPERTY, IT MAY BE interest conveyed to and now ldress and other common this state. In the event tender SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE.IF held by it under the Deed of isignation, if any, shown other than casn is accepted the YOU NEED AN EXPLANATION' Trust, in the real property. de- reln.The total amount of the trustee may withhold the issu- 'OF THE NATURE OF THE PRO- scribed as: PARCEL 1: AN ipaid balance of the obligation ance of the Trustee's Deed until CEEDING AGAINST YOU, YOU UNDIVIDED 1/42NO INTEREST cured by the property to be funds become available to the SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER! IN AND TO LOT 2 OF TRACT NO. Id and reasonable estimated payee or endorsee as a matter of 8492 HILLHEAD DRIVE, 11104,IN THE CITY OF HUNT sts,expenses and advances at tight.Said sale will be made,but HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA., INGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF e time of the initial publication without covenant or warranty. . the notice of sale is: express or implied, regarding 92646-6910' "(It a street ad- ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFOR- 183,140.68 In addition to title, possession, or encum- dress or common designation NIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP >Th.-the-trustee will accept a brances.to satisfy the indebted- of property Is shown above,no RECORDED IN BOOK 467, shier's.dtack drawn on a state ness secured by said deed. warranty' Is given as to Its PAGES 35 AND 36,OF MISCEL- patiotlall bank,a check drawn advances thereunder, with completeness or correctness)' LANEOUS MAPS,IN THE OFFICE a state or federal credit union interest as provided therein,and The beneficiary under said Deed OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF a check drawn by state or the unpaid principal balance of 'of Trust,by reason of a breach SAID COUNTY.EXCEPT THERE- 0 savings and loan asso the note secured by said deed or default in the obligations FROM ALL OIL,GAS,MINERALS ition, savings association or with interest thereon as provided secured thereby; heretofore AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS, vingsbankspecified msection in said note, fees,charges and executed and delivered to the BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET, 02 of the Financial Code and expenses of the trustee and the undersigned a written Declara- WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SUR- thorized to do business in this trusts created by said deed of tion of'Default and Demand for FACE ENTRY,AS RESERVED IN to.in the event tender other trust.dated:04/25/1996 Lender Sale. and written notice of INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD. n cash Is.accepted,the trus- Service Bureau, as said Trus- default and of election to cause- EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL may withhold the issuance of tee A California corporation 'the undersigned to sell said WATER AND SUBSURFACE trustee's deed until funds 19800 Macarthur Blvd.. Suite property to satisfy said obliga- WATER RIGHTS, BELOW A dine available to the payee or 1970 Irvine, CA 92715-2421 tions, and thereafter' the Un- DEPTH OF 500 FEET,WITHOUT lorsee as a matter of right. (714) 442-2850 by: Vicki R. dersigned caused said notice of THE RIGHT OF SURFACE EN- d sale WIN be made. but Molitz Senior Service officer default and of election to be TRY, AS DEDICATED OR RE- hmut coveratit or warranty, P77579 5/2.5t9.5116/96 1) 4nne Ccnwrcn ill 1h10Tm. CMTC (IC ruaLIV naI itita PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLI"OTICES_ PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES _ Continued from previous page PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN g BOLSA g < AR SY � g $4 , 1 tC' MC FAD EN 2s 2 b , � zY i C 'oil Zir 11 EDINGER 2-1 3o 31 y _ totZo q6 f ♦ IIRII. 34 3� 7Q 3b 3, 9�31 WARNrR 41 Ws. TALBERT 76 7 la Z5 `io 2A `Il 41 ♦ 71 SLATER ♦ ` �o q 5 r ELLIS O O I gl iw -Ai g ♦ 8� 7S _ _ _ _ nARI•I$I. ♦ 61 �c ly 10 87 ♦ b1►3 `1'i 55 � $4 I rob YORKTOWN zb 8 q �t y� / / i A9 �� �►8 ti9 ADAMS a 60 4y o r s f'INDIANAPOLIS � b 9 • ATLANTA 51 93 SIJIIAMI TON This map presents the general location of proposed changes to the General Plan 1 - 13ANNINCI land use designations. Please contact the f Department of Community Development for more detail and explanation. i i Continued on next page rwpwy WWI1VGli rvWly swI1FVfiA - rVohlV aw11bGs7 rypl+iy RV IFora - -'-. --%f.l"ass-, - Continued from previous page PROPOWD GENERAL PLAN EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING. PLANNING COMMISSION LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS NO CENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UPDATED GENERAL PLAN PLAN COMMITTEE (Designations to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the city Council ! rn CG ICommcrcial CR-F2-D(Commercial CG(Comnerciaf Cn:ncml Commercial Regional rCR-1`2- - Gencmli Regional.Density 0 5 FAR. D) The following table presents a list of the properties in Huntington Beach that are recommended to have the j Dcs,n(hcdai} General Planland use designation changed or altered. The table describes existing General Plan designation.the 1. CG tc." rnat CR-1`2-D(Commercial CG(Commercial General - Commereiah Regional(CR-F2- General Plan Advisory Committees recommended land use designations,the existing zoning,and the Planing C,cncmU Regim,ah Density 0 5 FAR. D) Comalissiends recommended land use designations. A map.with corresponding munhers,has been included to ucsi m 0cMm5) 32. CG(Con ,crawl CR-F2-U(Connncrcr,d CG(Cm)r c dal G-eml) C'ommcrciat Rcg+onal aid in in the location of the affected properties. - Crcncrnf)"+ IRegional,fensrtv 0.5 F.AR, Uj Ucsi nO+crlarl EXISTING CENTRAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION 33. I,,Q.P.P MV-Fit-D IMixcd Use RL(Residential Lox lensing. Mixed Use Vertical(f I V-Fa-D) NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENAATIONS (Public. Vcmcal.Densily 1.5 FAR IG(General hidostrial}-CG-I1 PLAN COMMITTEE - - (Designations to be cnneidered Quasi-Public, iMUI.0 75 FAR,ICI.25 (Commercial Genemh-1 high Rise DFSIGNATR)N 1 DESIGNATION hr the City Council b"w'.60"A)MD uWac) Overlay) 1 RL(Residential CN-FI(Commercial -CG ,FP2(Commercial CRneml, Commercial Neighborhood ! (M.'cd Law Density) - Neighborhood,Density 0.35 Floodplam) -(CN-FI) Uct d"Pim"D FAR 2 RH(Residential P(RI I-30)Public- RH(Residential High Den x sily) Residential Lo unh Public(PI �I CG tc'onunerced M V-1')-SP(Miscd Ilse CG(Conuierci:d General) C rim crcia{Regional-FAR S. lbgh Density) underlying Residential High dcsignalum;decrease indensin. General" \'crtical.[eosin L5 PAR Specific Plan(CR-F2•SP) Density 30 aNac from 30 to 7 dWac.P(RL-7) IMUI,0 5 FAR ICI.25 3 RL(Residential CN-FI(Commercial -CC(Commercial General) Commercial Neighborhood mVaC) 1-ox Density Neighboyboad.Dcutill 0.35 (CN-FI) 15. CQ(C'nmmerc,af MV-Fill-D•A(Miscd CG-RMII-RM(Commercial Mixed Use Vertical,decrease FAR) General RMH Use Vertical,Dcnsin-1 5 General,Residential Mcdnun densnv from 25 to 15 dins Rl.(Resukmial P(Rl--6.5)Public- RL(Residential I-mv Dcnsin) Public(P)designation.rcm,n IP,csidemial FAR iMUI.-1.5 FAR ICi.25 High Dcnsin-,Residential Loo,lensdv) i krlying Lou'Density ma-iium 7 0 dWac i Medimn I hgh dWac,Design Oxvrlay.Auto Medium Dcnsi(y) _ Residential,6.5 uWac -Dcnsil})RM Orerlay) 5 Recreation P(Public) RA-RI.(Residential Public(P)designation 10 1 (Rcsidcmial Agriculume,Rmidemial Lox idc.11A uldity right of say 1 Nbxh.m Dcnsitr) 6 RL lRcxidenuaf TN-FI-(Cuimnters:ial C(i-FP2(Cmnoicrcml General, Cbuuuc,nal Ncighlorh",xi 16 CG(Cnmmeraal MV-Fli)-D-A(Mixed CC,-RM(Comutcrcml G--it. Mixed Use Vertical,decrease d Lox Dcnsin) Neighborhood.Density 0,35 Fkxxlplano I(CN-FI) Wts,I )RM Vertical.Density LS Rcsidcmial Medium Iensin-) dcnsin From 25 2e 15 dWac - FAR) _ _ I IRcsicmia( FAR IMI_!l.LS FAR Iq,IS olcghbnd, d Mechlin,Dcnsin} dn'ac.Design Cherlay,Auto a Rl.(Residential CN-Fl(Commercial Q-CG-FP2(Qualified. Conunea Ni Lox Density) Neighborhood,Density 0.35Commercial General. fit cr lat}FAR). FI lain) i ' C'G(('ommial crc MV-1111-D IMixed Use RM(Residemial Medium Mixed Use Vertical,decrease 9 RM(Residential - OS-P(Olen Space-Park) OS-PR-FP2(Open Space. ;Open Space-Park(OS-P) Gcn ort sin cml)RM Cical.Dcn 15 FAR Dcnsin) density from 25 to 15 dWac Meduou Density) - Parks and Recreation. (Rcsidcmial @tUl.LS FAN ICI.15 Flood lain} ! !Medium Dcnsin) drdac,Dcsigo Otcrlay) I I RM(Residential CN-FI-D(Commercial CG(Commercial Gcncral) Co mercml Neighborhood l 18 RH(Revdcnnal P(RM11-25)Public- RMH(Rcsidentia(Medium High Residential Medium High Medium Density) -Ncigbl)orfiatd.Tensity 0.35 !WN-FI-D) i i High Dcnsav) I ,ndcd,ing Residential Density) Density and add Public(P) FAR Design O+"crlay) Meduun Ihigh Dcnsin,25 designation,dyes dercnu c 12. RM(Residential OS-P(Open Space-Park) RM-0(Residential Mcdnnn 'Open Spaec-Park(OS-PI ! I • densin from 13 to 25 cheat Medium Dcnsin) - Density.Oil(h-crlat) ( i i --------- - 11. RM(Rcsiuknual P(Red-Ic)Public• Desity.Oil 0, Mcdinm Public iPj I " I M,xcd U5c RS111-25(Residential Q-RMH 0"11,ticd..Rcsidcmial Rcsidcmial Medium High i I Medimn Ihgh Density.2s Medluni Il,gh Dcnsnr) Density 25 dWuc Medium Densin} underlying Residential Density) ! oWac Medium Density 15 uWac _ 14 RM(Residential P(RM--15)Public- Rht(Residential Mcdmm i Pubhc(P) ui Cnnuncda:rf - RN1-I5(Rcs;demial OP(Ohm Pmec ionaq ('ommercial Gcreral-FAR 95 i l Medium Density) underlying Residential Density} � Gcncral ledwm Dcnsilvj (CG-FI) " Medium Density 15 uWac 41 CG lCnnuucrcial Rif.u)(Residcnlial thigh CG(L'onnacrcia rc l C;circrall Cumn,cel Gerrcral-FAR IS- 15. IG(btdus m trial P(1)Public-underlying - IL Looed) !Public tP) ~1 ( Oenced) UcoUcns_in 10 UWite) I(CG-FII General) _j_ j i2 j RM(Resideniiai 1 P(Put hc)-designation to I CG lCmnnicreia(Gcncral) Public(P) i !Mcdmm Dens,10 j rcOcct hoe dal V i EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMh71SS10N EXISTING GENFRAL PLAN EXISTING,TONING PLANNING COMMISSIONy NO GENERAL - - ADVISORY - RECOMMENDATIONS 11 E GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN - - COMMITTEE (Designations to be considered PLAN CONIINf"t-FEE inesi4mations to be considered DESIGNATION - DESIGNATION -- - by the Cit Council DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the Cit-CwaeT " 16. MLyal MH.F3-M-SP(Mixed Pacifica Community.Plan Mixed Use and add Specific 43. RN4{Residential RMH-2S(Residential RM-RMH(Residcnlial Residential Medium Density 13 Development Use Horizontal,Density 1.0 Plan(SP) Medium Dcnsin) Medium Ihgh Densny.25 Medium Density;Residential "Be FAR.30 un(ac:Specific uNx) Medium Ili•h Density) Plan 44 RM(Residential RH-Ili(Restdcnnaf High RM-RMII(Re,adcnual Residential Mcdium Density IS - 17. RM(Residential P IRMII.25)Public- RMII(Residcnlial Medium(high Public(P)designation.,viCItasc Mcdmm Density) Dcnsrty,3n uWac) Alcdium[cosily;Residential dWx Medium I ligh Dcnsin) _ Medium Density) Medium 11 Residential Ocnsit}} density from IS to 25 des/x 45 RM fl(endennal CG-Ff(Commercial RM(Residential Medium Commercial General{CG-Ft) Malann IliglrDentlly 25 Ntttlunn Ucnsnv (in+crflUcusHr o.35 FAR).. IensiR) IR. RM(Residential OS Park(Open Space.hark) OS-PR(Open Spec,Parks a,d Open Space-Park(OS-P) 46 RM tlte"de"I'M lit I-nn(Itcsidcnlial Ihigh RM(Residcnlial Mcdinm Residcutial Medium Val IS Density) - Recreation) Medium Dcnsin) Density,3n nNac) Density) dtriac Molkam Iv. RL(Raidenliai RM-IS(Residential - RMP(Residential Manufactured Residenia Low Density 7.0 4n RM(Residential P(RI -30)Public• RM(Residential Medium Residential-MadiunvEknsHy_FS_-- Lan,Density) Medium Density 15 uWac) Ilome P;uk) dWac and add Mobile Home Medlium Densin) Donning Rcsidcmial),igh Dcusilyj dWac and add Pntlie(P} osin.30 uNx - Park 0%ably ()r 49. RM(Residential P(RII-)()Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density 15 111. RL(Residernial P-(RI.-6.3)Public- RL(Residential Low Dcnsin) Public(P)des(gnatiou:(Main Medici.Density) under[)ing Residential f ligh Density) dWac and add Public(P) Low Denshy) underlying Residential taw maximum 70 du/ac - Density,30 uNac) - - Density 6.5 unfac) 49 RM(Residential P(RH-3011 Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density 15 '21_ SR{Senior RMH-25(Resitkmal (Q)RMH(QhilifiM, Senior Residcnlial to Residential Medium Density) underying Residentim 1(igh Dcnsin) dWac and add Public(P) Residential) Medium High Density 25 Residential Medium High) Medium High(RMH-25) Densin•.31,uWac} stiles) I _ SO RM{Residential CN-Ff(Commercial RM-FP2(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density - Medium Density) Neighborhood,Density In 35 Density.Floadplain) (RM-15)and Commercial 22. CG(Commercial f P(CN-1' Public- CG(Conuncrci:d C;cieraq Public(P) 5I CG(Con-crawl RNI-IS(Residential CG-FP2(Comm Crc ercial ner FAR) Neighborhood CN-Fl ah. Co nocicial General(CG-F!) General) m,ekrlying C'onurercial Neighborhood,Density 0.35 General) Mcdinm Dcnsin.15 nNac FI lain - FAR 52 RL(Residential CN-F t((......nerctil CG(Commercial General) Residential tow De nifty 7.0 23. hdusttial- MH-FI-30-$P(Mixed M2-01-CZ:R4-O-CZ:C 1 Mixed-Use HonzomA toss tensity) Ne,gift hood.FAR 0 15) dWac,requested Historic Report Resource Use Horimtdal.Density 0.35 -0 CZ(Industrial General.Oil recommend F2-30(5 FAR.30 to add Historic Overby _ Production FAR.30 uWac,Specific O'eflay.Coastal Zonr, du/ac).recnmmend";i c;agC sl OS-C(Open Space RL-6.5(Residential 1Aw LUD-CZ•FP2(Limited.Use Open Spam Cbsismilims(OS. Plan) Residential High Dcnsitr.Ol density of 15 dWac -Consen-:Winn) Densi(y.6 5 onfac) District,Cru,c!al 7nrie, C) - OAcrlay.Coastal Zone, Fiore)lam - -- Commercial i.cighborhoo+t,Oil ( 54 RM(Rcsidenuml RL-65lRH-10 Magnolia Pacific Specific Plan Residential Moalksue Density IS Overlay.Coastal Zone) Medium Density) (Residential Lox Density. do/ae devignition and add - 24. IG(Ittdmt(iat RM-15(Residential I (Industrial General Residential Low Density 7.0 6 5 umac,Residential High Specifre Panes ay General) - Medium Density,IS uWac) dWac Dcnsin,30 uWac - 55. RL(Rcsidentia! RM-15(Residential RMP(Residential Manufactured Residential Liar Deosay 7.0 25. IG(Industrial 1-F2-H(Industrial,Density IL(Industrial Limihed) add Historic(herlay Ltnv Density) Medium Density,15 unfacj _ Hone Park) divas diadvid ion and me_ Gcncral 0.5 FAR I listorial Ovtrla• Mobile Ikrte - 26. RL(Residential P(RL-6.5)Public• Rl,(Residential Low Density) Public(P)designation;relam 36. CG(Commercial RM-15(Residential CG(Commercial General) Commcrctd Gcncral{CO-F!) Low Density) underlying Residential-Loa rnaximum 7.0 dWac 4 Genial Medium Densin.15 unlac coal gnation i 57 CG(Commercial Rf I-3n(Residential High III (Residential High Density) Residential Medium Density 13 Density6.5 uWac 27, RL(Residential P(RL-6.5)Public- RL(Residential Lciv Density) Public(P)designation,retain Geucml Ilensit}•,30 uNac) dnJae - Low Density) underlying Residential Low ulamillum 7.0 dWac i - Densi•6.5 udaC RM(Residential RH-30(Residential High- RH(Residential high Density) _ 28. RM(Residential CN-Fl(Commercial CO(Commercial Gcncra rci l) Commeal Neighborhood Medium Dcnsnc) Density.30 solos) - - Medium,Density) Neightrorhood,Desit)It 35 (CN-FI) !SR CC,(Commercial RMH-25(Residential CG(Commercial General) -Cornmcrciat General(CG-F1) - FAR 29. P.Q-•P,I(Public. P(CG•F1)Public- PS(Public Semi Public) Commercial General(CG-FO Gcncral Medium High Density.25 uh'ac Qnasi-TuMic, wreri raying-ily 0.rcial and add Public(P)dcsignatiou !a1 Plarmed CG-F1(Commercial CG(Commercial G(rcial) Mixed use and add Specific Institutional) CreticraL Dcnsily 6.35 FAR) Commm,in General,Density 0.35 FAR Plan 2 4 Centing"On next page I PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was. printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: May 9, 1996 1 declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 9, 1996 at Costa Mesa, California. db-fA-- , Signature r 1 PUBLIC NO ICf ES - PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOT[,,-:, PUBLIC NOTICES PUBL'iC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES ;ontlaved from previous page _ PI.A\•:ING('OMSUcSI(3♦ FXISIIM' (;F.NFRAL PI,%N EXISTING ZONING PI.AS\ING COS1S55SS1O\ EXISTING G1:\I:RAL PLAN FXISTIAG ZONING RF(Uh1MFSIlATlO\S NO GF.NERAI, AOV150RV RF(OnS.V t:A IL4710\S I NO Gt:NFRA(. AD\"ISORY (11-icnalmm(o he umaidercd ('DnU11-FIFE (Dcaignxlinnn"bc cnuudrr,.dl f•(.AN Cl1 s1MIT1 Ft: h,�h�^(-ih,(nunril�'__� PLAN In Ihr(10.(-„unr;1) ,1 DESICN_ATION _Df_SIGNATIOV`•._ --_„-- _-- - UF.SIGNA i IO,Y U):SIGNAI IOY �on'1 I luulin loci(-enter h1,-xcd t:K and add Spcc:hc 1(MI I-A Gtccidcuual hisdium Kcsidcntial Nleduun 11�;h 1 91 1 hhxcd Rh111-m 1Rcndcunal g Plan t9P):10:9n turn 61 R>5 Utevdcul,al P(CN,-{)Puhhc- Medium IIt I fens" Ut Slxu Oc Plan Mahnm Ieninv) unolcrh.ng Coneenenal I Itgh Dena"_Sctat:Lot dean'and add Public tP) I DCt C10Prenl I Ju'ac) g, y - — - Nc,ghlorhtod.Denny 015 SsdxlnL•u•1 I --- -- - JAR 1(Rcg&W-I Medium Rcs�dcnnal h5cdm-,Ucnaas i s FAH. I I 92 'tat lRc.,don,.il..•P FRhl.Is)Public- du/a:and add Spcnrc Pia„(%I" acdmm lena�bl !crh mg Rcs.dcnl,a ,s,D1 1'Iltl:221 I'„bl'c- 1 _ I dca. ialron - Medium Dcnsn)I S d -Y undcdymg Rczidcnlial law I.A•O-CC-C7.-I P2 Agrtt with SUff,racm"cnA Dcnctty. 9l Piannu,g Rcscnc I-F2-D Ilndnslnal• cvntinµ dc•�¢unl�nua nc --- --- — i tkua,,,"s FAIT,Drc -1.,u:J I,,,,,,nl.OA 1„eh,.1'Cl."', 22 ulv (heda raum('onscnauou.Co.+uai ramamotdcd b)the('ah(onua 62 hh�cd RMII-25-U lNcvdcntial CG/ItMll-A(['ommcrcnl V,.xcd l;u 1(on/ontal(htl'FI- )) one.I Itxxlpla _ C'nmuucaon �Ucvcicpmcnl Mcdnnn{hgh[Runty.25 Gcncml/ 25) _--- , x-- -_--•- 1 91 Rl.IRa�Acnual P(CG-FI1 Public- G/RA I('nuuncra;J Gcncml/ I n'cnnnno.',l Geneal l(CrFI, uNx,Design(T cda)) Residential Medium Ihgh 11I c„dc,nc,l A t 1nuc) :u1J Public(P)dcagn.n�uu -' I 1 nu 11cn.,n1 uJnl)mg Cmnuw a I'."n LL L Dcnzit,Small I of Stddntn� -_ -- G iciest.pencil a 1 -�-- 1 ,t�4lRee,denl,al CN-FI-D(Cenin—W CG(Commercial General) Commercial Noigh",hwd I _ - —� 1(suk"n:J I nu Ueuuly ! (CN-FI) •;s- 1(I II(cadcn d:agnauon Medum Density-) Neighborhood,Densty 0 35_ARLks Dn Ocda- Ienal)n 15 FAR). as RM 1Res,Jcn0al CN-r I-D(Conm,crcial CG(Cmn"crclal 6cncrol) Restdenliat McdWm lh@it l aucrn hlf-RL-6Med=Denutyl Neighborhood.Density tl 15 Density 25 dWac and add Public (Residential Low De — I` FAR,Design Oscrlav (p I fi5 OP t0(L,c MV-Ft(-SP(Mixed Use CO-O(Commercial Office,oil Commttciad Office(CO•F2) d`Jx) - RL(Residemial Low Densm) -t Rendemml Low Density 7 n ` Profssswnall Vcrl,cal,Dcnuly 15 FAR (Tcrla,) designation and rnno,c Specific vb Hl.(Rcudcnual P(RL 6 5)Pnbhc- ou'ac and add Public(P) Plan Low lensJs) undcrly ing Residcnual Lmc _-�dcsi nation 1 Ih1L'I.o at FAR ICI.25 Dcnsav 6 5 du/ac �- dulac) 66 p•p.Q.I, RL-6.5(Res,dwW low RL-01(11Mkmtal low Residential Liu Dcnsay7n Published Iluptinyton ficich-Fountain Va]Iey Independent April 4, SR, May 11`uhhc.Ottan- Dearly.6 5 dWxl Dc"11, p0(Terlayl uNac and add Public IP) 19 6 Pnhhc, dcsigru(ion hw"amm�l) (,7 RM(Residential Rh-6.5(Residential Lmx RI,(Residential Low I)CPS.ty") Residential Low Density 7 0 _ f kd"un feus,tiL lensil 6 S dWxZ dWac RM(Rcs,dcmml 1•(Rbl-15)Pnbhc- I Inch Scachff Span Rc PL n Res,dcnual Mcdwm Iensny IS %ledmm Dane",) n,ukrl,ing Rcu,kntial (Rexuloncd Mcdmni leuvty/IV dWx mid add Spccirta Plan(SP) _ Medium Ucnsux 15 dWx_ -1) 7" W(IrdustnA RM-IS(I(cddcnlLil IG/11.(h,duurnl Goxral/ Industrial 0G-F•2) ocnamp Medium Density 0,dtJx Indnstnal Lsmaed5 71 Mnp1 P(M)I-I-t-30-SP)ILbhc Pacifica Com d mumly Plan Mixed Use,add Spcec Plan Ili elnpmcnt -undcrl,.ng Mncd Use (SP) I lnri,ouul.Den%m III FAR. 10 un/ac.�Jn,fc Plar, ]2 Mncd CG-F2-D(Commuc,a, CO(Commercial Officc) Mixed Use Hodeontal•decrease Dc,elopnlenl General.Denuly 0 5 FAR. density from 25 to I dWac _U(sigr(herlay) 711 RL(Rasidcutial P(RL-6 s)Public- RL(Residential Low Density) Resident.' I low Density 7 0 Los.IRusuy) u,Werl)-rig Rcs.dciuml Lou dul:lc.add Public W) _ fensns 6 s dWx 74 RM(Res,dcmml 1'(RMII-2%)Public- RMII(Res,dcnlul Medium High Resid-mil Mcdmm Dcnsn'%15 Medium Density) u,dcry mg Resdcmial Ocnsuy) dWac and add Public(P) Medium Iligb Density 25 dWac 75 O.S-R CV-I I(Contme-al CF-C-C7. Open Space Recreation and add (Open Span- Vtcnor.Density 0 35 FAR) (Commumit Facilities.Chic Pubhe(P)designation Recreauon) Uses Coastal Zone, 76_ RM(Rnrdcmnl RI.1 5(Rcndent.al Low RI-C7.(Rec.dcntial Lou, Residcittol Lair Density 7 0 Medium Densm Dcns,t-(.s dWac Densti3r,Costat Za i:1 dWac 5 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXLS77NG ZONING PLANNING COh1MI5"0N NO C.F.NF.RAI. ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS ' rI.AN rommm FF. (Designations In be eoaeidemd _ DESIGNATION DESIGNATION h the Clt Cowsaeil 77 hhxed Use RM-15,CR-FI-SP I lunlmgton harbour Day Club Mixed Use and add Specific (Residential Medium Density Spa.fa Plan Plan(SP)designation 15 dWac,Commercial Regional.Den tly 0.35 FAR S c.f.c Man) 71 OS-R(Open RI.•1,1(R.,dcnttal Low RL-1-P2 IRcudcmial Lmv peen Space-Park(OS-P) Slxxe- Density 6 5 dW cn ac) Dsn,.FloodpWin)RA-C7 Recrcmm0) IRca,dcnnal Agnedturc. Coastal Zone 79 Planned CG,RM•13.Rl.-6 S Mcdowh,k Speca-,c plan Mixed Use and add Specific Cnnunul"ty !Crn,n„crcuI Gc,cral. Plan(SPI daig-Imn R-cl,n16i Aledmn,Ucuwly. IS dWac.Resident.l I.ow Dcntty 6 5 dWac RO IG(Industrial P(I)Public-urdnly'ng IL Ilnduslrial Limited) Industrial(1-F2) Genncnal Irtduslna{ RI. Residential RI.-¢S lResldenll.'tl Lou Etlis Golden West Specific Plan Residential Estak 3 dWac Fslmc.3 dWac Density-6 5 dWac R2 Rcs.dcnlml Fsntc. RL-6 5(Rcs.denlml Low holly SM11IF Specific Plan Resi,kntial Estate a dWac and •(A"/ac and Open Dv d,6 5 dWac)aid Open (Re,dermal low Dens.ly,a S nee-Park dmi S 1a-Rccrcatton S cc+Park OI'cn'P• gnmions uc,/acROQcn ryxc5 Rl IG(Industrial CR- 2-V(Commercial IG(Industrial Gcmnl) Comnareial RegioMl(CR-Fb Ciencmt) Regnut 1.Dens.t)0 5 FAR, D) _ _Ih�u.(Tcrlav�_ aces Ebael lee 1-17-I)IOnluvual. IL d,ulumnl I imdell Iudnaln:J(1-I'2-UI Dcnsn,!0 S FAR.Iewgn (h cda,l NS Mncd Use CO-Fi(Commcrnai URcc- Nnrlh I lunhnglon Ccincr h1b,ce Usc and add SpectOc Dcnsn y 1 23 FAR S tfic Plan area Plan(SP dal nation xh.ed Use CG-F I Camnutaal - _--1 O-11-0)-lificd.InJunnat Inhsanal 0LP1 cr F2) Cmncml,Ientty0 R (Comcr.-11 i s FAR) Limited)- c( cslcnUatfbgh CGWomnrc,al General) Cmunmrcial Gcncral(CG•FI) -Cicncnl) Dcnsnv 11)uNac RR C•G(Commercial RII-10(Rcsidcnual Iligh CG(Commen"I'l G"-rab Cortrrccml Gcncral ICG-FI) Gcncmry Iensity 10 uNacL_- x9 RI.(Readcntwl RI.-6 5(Residential Low RI-O-CZJR1.(RestAcnl,al Open Spew-park(OS-P) L,:,,Dcnsn,) Density 6 5 dufac) Liu•Density-.Od(Talay. Co.w.117nnelResidcmiai Low Dcn,31N 'm I I(15-1 O.cn MI I-P2-25- '�---'— 1 I SP(hhxcd 1)RA-O-CC-C-7-FP2 Agre a m:h Staff.recommend �pacc- I;w Ilo...ou an:A.Dn,0 5 (Re-l-nl Agnadlnrco Oil rcout c-iml;dcs,gtcvtons as i"oi,],nc nahon_21 FAR.25 dwx.Specific 'O'etlas•Cm%tal Cneccn:`4m, icmmmcndcd by the CahCarma V �' P1.n) ('ca Zinc.F7odl:.,:n CostaI Commission , 2)VSC-CZ.rcizl) FP2 Visit., RM Nc-119 Co,nmcrnal.Comin 7onc.Floodp!am 1(Restdeennl 3)a01-C7-FP2(xtob,le .Med u"i Dc,s i)) home.Cnactal 7anc.Fkodpla:n I � 1 a)hSI-A-O-C7-FP2 (Ind,, ri:.l I.ul d.0.1(herd:,, .Coaual Zonc, 6 PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIF NOTICES NOTICE D� TRUSTEE'S SALE (payable in full at the time cured by the above de- ax:luslve us= com rIl area repting Therefrom the Fol LOAN. 811356i%IORRIS-CONV NOTICE OF TRUST UNDER DEED OF TRUST FILE: of sale to T.D. Service scribed Deed of Trust and Excicsive e_:sere,:= appurte- lowing, (A) Units 247 OTHER 67CC;159 FILE:F-13788 SALE T.S No.805166 803366A.P.NUMBER:159-032- Company) all right, title estimated costs, ex- rant to par.--'s nc f ;:rid no 2 Through 284 Inclusive, as A.P NUMBER 139-223-13 178-103.04 Loan Ot YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER and interest conveyed to penses, and advances is described �rove tc oalcony Shown upon the Condomin- NOTICE OF TRUSTEE'S SALE 5097936 REF: FARI A DEED OF TRUST DATED August and now held by it under $127,502.30. It is possi- purposes "`_ shown and as- ium Plan,Pecorded June 24, UNDER DEED OF TRUST YOU GARY L. 8, DONNA 12, 1987 UNLESS YOU TAKE said Deed of Trust in the ble that at the time of sale slgneo in the alan ant::Jescribed 1986,as Listrument No.86- ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER A PORTANT NOTICE ACTION TO PROTECT YOUR property hereinafter de- the opening bid may be as an exclLswe LSe common 267537 of Official Records DEED OF TRUST. DATED March PROPERTY OWNER: PROPERTY.IT MAY BE SOLD AT scribed: TRUSTOR: Har- less than the total indebt- area ,he 'ecla.aFar Parcel of Said Orange County. (8) 26. 1992. UNLESS YOU TAKE ARE IN DEFAULT UND'. A PUBLIC SALE.IF YOU NEED AN old L. Rosen, BENEFICI- edness due. Date: no. 5 cx_-..siv:: -asetnents The Exclusive Right to Pos- ACTION TO PROTECT YOUR DEED OF TRUST, Dp EXPLANATION E THE NATURE ARY: can America Fi- 4/23/96 T.D. SERVICE a pC".enani::;pa;Gels iio 1 and session of All Those Areas PROPERTY. IT MAY BE SOLD NOVEMBER 10, OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST nancial Corporation Re- COMPANY, as said nc 2 descnn.d al a3 r for park- Designated as Enclosed Park- YOU,YOU SHOULD CONTACT A corded May 13, 1991 as Trustee, BY: Debra ''g purpose. o,- r 'te area in Covered Parkin and AT A PUBLIC SALE. IF YOU UNLESS YOU TAKE LAWYER. Notice is hereby given Instr. No. 91-231990 of Brundage, Assistant Sec- cesigiated r.c ;JS cr, exhibit Parkmy Spaces, rk Shown NEED AN EXPLANATION OF THE TION TO PROTECT Y that SERRANO RECONVEYANCE Official Records in the of- ,� the r _a atln and de- NATURE OF .HE PROCEEDING PROPERTY, IT MAY rotary , ArnoldAtine Drive, r o upon the Condominium Plan AGAINST YOU. YOU SHOULD SOLD AT A PUBLIC S, � COMPANY.as;rustee,or succes- fice of the Recorder of sc:red as ';rl exc'.;:•;_ use F Ste. C, Martinez, CA above Referred to. Except CONTACT A LAWYER.NOTICE is IF YOU NEED AN EXI sor trustee,or substituted trustee Orange County: said 94553-6526 (570) 229_ common area; :na i:e araP.on. therefrom All Oil, Gas,Min- pursuant to the Deed of Trust Deed of Trust describes Parcel no xriorilie ease- hereby given that QUALITY NATION OF THE NAT 9015 We are assisting the melts brass and Other Hydrocar- executed D ALFRED C.HI?P AND the following a no 2 an' ,c parcels LOAN SERVICE CORP. as OF THE PROCEEL y g property: Beneficiary to collect a hp 1 and rid 2 des rb-;d above bons,as Rtserved in Instru- trustee.or successor trustee.pr AGAINST YOU, ANNE P. HIPP, HUSBAND AND Parcel 1: Unit 5 of Lot 17 debt and an information ments of hecord. PARCEL y for storage p rpe«s as shawl' substituted trustee pursuant to SHOULD CONTACT WIFE Recorded on 0B191987 as in Tract No. 5613.City of we obtain will be used for 2: U^±28"as Shown upon nstrument No. 87-469460 of Huntington Beach,County that purpose whether re- aril assign ' it fhb p'ae and tale Cordominium Plan above the Deed of Trust executed bV LAWYER.On May 24. 1 P Po described l :hp. a ;:I,;:aeon as DONALD MORRIS AND JODY at 10:00 A.M., Cal-Wes Official Records in the offce of of Orange. State of Cali- ceived oral or in writing. s:;a " on area Referred to PARCEL S:The MORR!S HUSBAND AND WIFE Reconve ance Corp.N 9 ar 9x lu. :he County Recorder of Orange forma. as shown and de- IF AVAILABLE, THE EX- �.J_ c Exclusive Right to Posses- Y a [ County, California, aril p9Saant fined on a ma recorded Assessors ra"Ce 37-16- son and Occu arc of AS ,;DINT TENANTS.-and Re- fornia corporation as P PECTED OPENING BID -,37 The street of [her common p y corded on 04/06/1992 as In- appointed trustee under to the Notice of Defaa t and in Book 333, Pages 40 to MAY BE OBTAINED BY des nation -at said properr is Those Portions of Lot 1 De- o c ur Election to Sell thereurder re- 45, inclusive, of Miscella- g ) scribed in Parcel 1 Above, strument No. 2 213 34 cf O,- pursuant to Deed of T CALLING THE FOLLOW- purported to De 2323 Hurting- ficial records in the office of the recorded November corded 0122'1995 as!,sr.ament neous Maps, in the office ING TELEPHONE NUM- 'on Street. z8r Designated as CP-283 and �c Huntington County Recorder of ORANGE 1993, as inst. No. No. 96-031748 of said Axial of the County Recorder of BER ON THE DAY BE- EeaC^.California Said sale•:ills'be EP-283 as Appurtenant to Cony_California.and pursuant 0813290, deed of trust Records, will sell on 05,23'1996 said Orange County. FORE THE SALE: 510 made without coveran.t or Parcels 1 and 2 above De- at the Main (North) Entrance to Parcel 2: An undivided ( ) scribed. County Assessor's to he Notice of Default and re-recorded on 8/22/94 313-9581. TAC No: ,varra.nty.express Gr implied as tY Election to Sell thereunder instrument no. 94-0515( the County Courthouse. 700 12% interest in Lot 17 of to title. possession or erc m_ Situs Address: 7291 Coh0 recorded 0 22,r1995 as Instru- of Official Records in 426908M, Pub: p' Drive, City of Huntington Q' Civic Center Drive West, Santa Tract No.5613,as Shown 5/2,5/9,5/16,1996 brances to satisfy the unpaid Beach, California, APN ment No. 95-414590 of said office of the County Recoi Ana, Ca at 9:45 AM at public on a map recorded in balance due on the note or notes Official Records.WILL SELL on of Orange County, �^ vza v��ac an in DIIRI If`NATIrF y said deed of trust #937-16-204. The property g State secured b y 05123,'1996 at 10:00 A M.a: IN California,executed b 6 I onably estimated costs. heretofore described is being r Y and advances at the sold"as is". The street ad- `RONT OF THE FLAGPOLES AT L. Farnam and Donna Me initial Dubl:cation of dress and other common THE MAIN ENTRY AREA TO THE Farnam, husband and v PLACENTIA CIVIC CENTER 401- will sell at public auctior ce of sale to wit. designation, if any, of the 65 dated April 23. real property described 411 EAST CHAPMAN AVENUE highest bidder for ca t American Mortgage above is purported to be: PLACENTIA. CA AT PUBLIC cashier's check drawn o A California Corpo- 7291 COHO DRIVE,#107, AUCTION TO THE HIGHEST state or national bank rustee by. Harry Kaye. HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA BIDDER FOR CASH (payable at check drawn by a state ident 2100 Howell Ave. 92648. The undersigned the time of sale in lawful money federal credit union, of Anaheim. CA 92806 Trustee disclaims any liabil- of the United States), all right. check drawn by a state 6195 p77424 ity for any incorrectness of title and interest conveyed to federal savings and I, a116;'96 the street address and other and now neld by It under said association, savings as common designation,if any, Deed of Trust in the property ciation, or savings b BLIC NOTI E shown herein. Said sale will situated in said County and Sate specified in section 5102 be made,but without cove- hereinafter described: LOT 158 the financial code E OF TRUSTEE'S nant or warranty,expressed OF TRACT NO 3487. IN THE authorized to do busines Trustee Sale No. 96- or implied, regarding title, CITY OF COSTA MESA. IN SAID this state will be held at Title Order No. possession, or encum- COUNTY AND STATE. AS entrance to the Orange 309 Reference No. brances,to pay the remain- SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED Hall, 300 East Chapr 72-1 APN No. 937- ing principal sum of the IN EOOK 122, PAGES 6 TO 16 Avenue, Orange, Califor 4 YOU ARE IN DE- notels)Secured by said Deed 'NCLUSIVE. OF MISCELLANE- all right, title and inte• T UNDER A DEED OF of Trust,with interest there- OUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF conveyed to and now hel T DATED 12/1 1/91. on, as provided in said THE COUNTY RECORDER OF it under said Deed of Tru S YOU TAKE ACTION note(s), advances, if any, SAID COUNTY The property the property situated in OTECT YOUR PROP- under the terms of the Deed address and other common County and State descr IT MAY BE SOLD AT of Trust, estimated fees, :esidnation if any. of the real as: as described in BLIC SALE. IF YOU charges and expenses of the prcwerr✓ described above is deed of trust. The s AN EXPLANATION OF Trustee and of the trusts N rported to be 1653 BlWNI address and other com ATURE OF THE PRO- created by said Deed of PLACE 1OSTA MESA.CA 92626 designation, if any, of INGS AGAINST YOU, Trust,to-wit: $193,327.07 The snoersigned Trustee dIS- real property descr SHOULD CONTACT A Estimated. Accrued interest Clams any liability for any In- above is purported to ER. On May 30, and additional advances,if correctness of the prooerN ad- 16042 Melody Lane,Hun at 11:00 AM,Proles- any,will increase this figure dress and other common aesig- ton Beach, CA 92649. Foreclosure Corporb- prior to sale. The benefi- nation.it any.shown herein.The undersigned Trustee s the duly appointed ciary under said Deed of total amount of the unpaid claims any liability for e under and pursuant Trust heretofore executed balance of the obligation se- incorrectness of the s ed of Trust,recorded and delivered to the under- Cured by the property to be sold address and other com /27/91 as Document signed a written Declaration and reasonable estimated costs designation, if any, s 1-711588 Book Page of Default and Demand for expenses and advances at the herein. Said sale wil fficial Records in the Sale,and a written Notice of time of the initial publication of made, but without cov e of the Recorder of Default and Election to Sell. the Notice of Sale is: or warranty, express GE County,California, The undersigned caused said S216.894.32 In addition to cash implied, regarding uted by: STEPHEN A. Notice of Default and Elec- the Trustee will accept a cash- possession, condition ICK AND SHERI G. tion to Sell to be recorded in ier's check drawn on a state or encumbrances, incl ICK, HUSBAND AND the county where the real national bank.a check drawn by fees.charges and exp as Trustor, GREEN- property is located and more a state or federal credit union or of the Trustee and o CAPITAL FINANCIAL, than three months have a check drawn by a state or trusts created by said as Beneficiary. WILL elapsed since such recorda- federal savings and loan asso- of Trust,to pay the re AT PUBLIC AUCTION tion. Professional Foreclo- ciation, savings association or ing principal sums o HE HIGHEST BIDDER sure Corporation as Trustee, savings bank specified in SeC- note(s) secured by CASH(payable at time 2033 N.Main Street,Suite tion 5102 of the Financial Code Deed of Trust to le in lawful money of 550, Walnut Creek, CA and authorized to do business In $214,200.37 with in r ited States, by cash, 94596,Telephone Number: this State. In the event tender thereon from 3/01/9 hier's check drawn by (510)933-4660,By: Scott other than cash is accepted the 6.875% per annum a to or national bank, a Brody,Foreclosure Special- Trustee may withhold the issu- vided in said note(s) k drawn by a state or ist, Date: 05/01/96 ance of the Trustee's Deetl until costs and any advance ral credit union, or a NPP13900 PUB: 05/09/96, funds become available to the interest.estimated tota k drawn by a state or 05/16/96,05/23/96 payee or endorsee as a matter of $239.964.48.The bene ral savings and loan right.Said sale will be made,but under said Deed of ciation,savings associa- PUBLIC NOTICE without covenant or warranty. heretofore executed or savings bank speci- express or implied regarding delivered to the undo in section 5102 of the Fictitious Business title. possession or encum- a written Declarati ncial Code and autho- Name Statement brances.to satisfy the indebted- Default and Deman to do business in this The following persons are ness secured by said Deed. Sale,and a written No e1. At: IN THE QUAD doing business as: Roman advances thereunder, wit" Default and Election 11 A OF THE CITY HALL Empire, 14881 Trojan Cir- interest as provided therein,and The undersigned BUENA PARK CIVIC cle, Huntington Beach, CA the unpaid principal balance of said Notice of Defau TER,AT 6650 BEACH 92647 ttrs Note secured by said Deed Election to Sell to LEVARD,BUENA PARK, Edgar Roman, 14881 Tro- with interest thereon as provided corded in the county .all right,title and inter- jan Circle, Huntington in said Note, fees, charges and the real property is I conveyed to and now Beach.CA 92647 expenses of the trustee and the For sales information: by it under said Deed of This business is con- ;rusts created by said Deed of Fri 8:00a.m. to 5: t in the property situated ducted by:an individual Trust. We are assisting the (619)590-9200. Cal-W aid County, California Have you started doing Beneficiary to collect a debt and Reconveyance Corp cribing the land therein: business yet?No any Information we obtain will be East Main Street, P.C. IBIT A PARCEL 1: An Edgar Roman used for that purpose whether 22004, El Cajon, Ca 9 ivided 1/38th Interest in This statement was filed received orally or in writing. 9004 (619)59C to Lot 1 of Tract 12141, with the County Clerk of Dated. 0 412 5/1 9 9 6 DUALITY DateclApril 17,1996,E the City of Huntington Orange County on 3-22-96 LOAN SERVICE CORP., as said L. Cunamay, Ext. ch, County of Orange, 19963677612 Trustee 1650 E. FOURTH Trustee Sale nfficer to of California, as per H.B. Independent March STREET, 2ND FLOOR SANTA 5/02;09;16/91 R4 p Recorded in Book 559, 28,April 4,11,18,1996 ANA, CA 92701 (714)285-9962 tes 18 to 20 Inclusive of amended publication May All' / \`m ;cellaneous Maps,in the p Y B :KAREN S.ALDAG AUTHOR- \b e 9,1996. I ED SIGNATURE QPP 21884 PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NQTIC15 N PUBLIC NOTICE auctcd tby: .o-par^ers tain Valley,CA 92708 PUBLIC NOTICE Have ,,ou starloi doing This business is con- Fictitious Business bus:r:ess yc'.?No ducted by:an individual Fictitious Business Name Statement hike Dorrttry Have you started doing Name Statement The following persons are This state rent wag filed business yet?Yes The following persons ari doing business as: A+ w'th th,, County dark of Heather L.Barron doing business as: H-1 Transmissions, Inc., 7542 Grange Co.;nty on 5-3-96 This statement was filed Consulting, 16141 Bead Warner Ave., Huntington 19963682155 with the County Clerk of Blvd, Ste. 200, Huntingtoi Beach,CA 92647 H,.B. Independent May, 9, Orange County on 4-19.96 Beach,CA 92648 Ar Transmissions, Inc., 16,23,30, 1996 052-566 19963680631 Peter Mazzola 1814 7542 Warner Ave.,Hunting- H.B. Independent April 25, Beach Blvd,Ste.200, Hur ton Beach,CA 92647 PUBLIC NOTICE 25, May 2,9, 16,1996 044- tington Beach,CA 92648 This business is con- - Flctltlous Business 441 This business is con ducted by:a corporation ducted by:an individual Have you started doing Name Statement PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started doing business yet?yes The following persons are business yet?Yes Eleonore Hepprich, Presi- doing business a s: Fictitious Business Peter S.Mazzola dent Artquest,8248 Atlanta Ave., Name Statement This statement was filer This statement was filed #A, Huntington Beach, CA The following persons are with the County Clerk e with the County Clerk of 92646 doing business as: Pristine Orange County on 4-19-96 Orange County on 4-19-96 Duncan & Shu-Ling Bene- Air, 19572 Aragon Circle, 19963680625 19963680645 dict,8248 Atlanta Ave.,#A, Huntington Beach, CA H.B. Independent April 25 H.B. ,Independent April 25 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 p p 6 Patricia L.Rountree,19572 25,May 2,9,16,1996 044 9264 25, May 2,9,16,1996 044- This business is con- Aragon Circle, Huntington 41 443 ducted by: husband and Beach,CA 92646 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE wife This business is con- Have you started doing ducted by:an individual Fictitious Ousiness Fictitious Business business yet?no Have you started doing Name Statement Name Statement Duncan J.Benedict business yet?No The following persons an The following persons are This statement was filed Patricia Rountree doing business as: Priorir doing business as: Con- with the County Clerk of This statement was filed One, 8907 Warner Ave. struction Product's Unlim- Orange County on 4.25-96 with the County Clerk of Huntington Beach, C/ ited, 3392 Sparkler Dr„ 19963681350 Orange County on 4-19-96 92647 Huntington Beach, CA H.B. Independent May 9, 19963680659 Muhan, Inc., 8907 Warne 92649 16,23,30,1996 052-576 H.B. Independent April 25, Ave., Huntington Beach Alisa Lynn Claus, 3392 25, May 2,9, 16,1996 044- CA 92647 Sparkler, Huntington PUBLIC NOTICE 445 This business is con Beach,CA 92649 ducted by:a corporation This business is con- Fictitious Business PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started doin( ducted by:an individual Name Statement business yet?No Have you started doing The following persons are Fictitious Business Byeong C.Choi,President business yet?No doing business as: J-K Name Statement This statement was file( Alisa Lynn Claus Property Management, 915 The following persons are with the County Clerk q This statement was filed Lake, Huntington Beach, doing business as: JPA Orange County on 4-19-96 with the CountyClerk of CA 92648 Consultants, 9710 Marigold 9 19963680647 Orange County on 4-19-96 Jerry McKinish, 915 Lake, Ave, Fountain Valley, CA H.B. Independent April 25 19963680007 Huntington Beach, CA 94708 N.B. Independent April 25, 92648 John Paul Avanzino, 9710 25,May 2,9,16, 1996 144q This business Is con- Marigold Ave,Fountain Val- i 25, May 2,9, 16, 1996 044- ducted by:an individual ley,CA 92708 PUBLIC NOTICE 452 Have you started doing This business is con- PUBLICNOTICE business yet?No ducted by:an individual Fictitious Business l Jerry McKinish Have you started doing Name Statement Fictitious Business This statement was filed business yet?No The following persons a with the County Clerk of John Paul Avanzino Name Statement doing business as: Orange County on 4-16-96 This statement was filed The following persons are Friendly Software, 184 with the Coun Clerk of doing business as: Party 19963680249 ty Carnaby Ln., Huntingt City Huntington Beach, 19 H.B. Independent April 25, Orange County on 4-19-96 Beach,CA 92648 Anda Lucia, Irvine, CA 25, May 2, 9, 16, 1996 044- 19963680660 Carla Apodaca, 184 92714 432 H.B. Independent April 25, Carnaby Ln., Huntingt PCHA dae Lucia,CAIrvine CA PUBLIC NOTICE 25, May 2,9, 16,1996 046 Beach, business is co 92714 ducted by:an individual This business is con- Fictitious Business PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started doll ducted by:a corporation Name Statement business yet?No ? Have you started doing The following persons are Fictitious Business Carla Apodaca business yet?No doing business as: Mimi's Name Statement This statement was film Marion Lepson, Secy. Jewelry, 18591 Brookhurst The following persons are with the County Clerk Treas. St, Fountain Valtey, CA doing business as: Classic Orange County on 4-19-9 This statement was filed 92708 Cleaning Agency, 3419 Via 1996368066 with the CountyClerk of Mimi Truong, 9912 New- Lido#137,Newport Beach, p H.B. Independent April Orange County on 4.15-96 castle Ave, Westminster, CA 92663 19963680073 CA 92683 Diane Ryder, 3419 Via 25, May 2,9, 16, 1996 0 This business is con- Lido#137, Newport Beach, 4 H.B. Independent April 25, p ducted by:an individual CA 92663 25, May 2,9, 16, 1996 044- Have you started doing This business is corn PUBLIC NOTICE ` 454 business yet?Yes ducted by:an individual Fictitious Businessi PUBLIC NOTICE Mimi Truong Have you started doing Name Statement This statement was filed business yet?No The following persons Fictitious Business with the County Clerk of Diane Ryder doing business as: S Orange County on 4-16-96 This statement was filed Name Statement tiago V. Landscape, 7 The following persons are 19963680239 with the County Clerk of Newman Ave., Hunting . doing business as: A) H.B. Independent April 25, Orange County on 4-19-96 Beach,CA 92647 Kibler Contracting & Con- 25,May 2,9, 16, 1996 044- 19963680667 Santiago Virgilio, 78 suiting. B) American Medi- 433 H.B. Independent April 25, Newman Ave., Huntingtt cal Office Software, 18864 25,May 2,9, 16, 1996 044- Beach,Ca 92647 Carolyn Lane, Huntington PUBLIC NOTICE 450 This business Is co Beach,CA 92646 ducted by:an individual Jeffrey P. Kibler, 18861 Fictitious Business PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started do Carolyn Lane, Huntington Name Statement business yet?Yes Beach,CA 92646 The following persons are Fictitious Business Santiago Virgilio This business is con- doing business as: N.W. Name Statement This statement was fi� ducted by:an individual Dix &Associates, 418 Cali- The following persons are with the County Clerk Have you started doing fornia St. #B, Huntington doing business as: Mail Orange County on 4-16- business yet?Yes Beach,CA 92648 Boxes Etc..., 200 Main St. 199636802 JeffreyP.Kibler Nigel W. Dix, 418 Cali- #104, Huntington Beach, fornia St. #B, Huntington 9 H.B. Independent April This statement was filed 9 CA 92648 25,May 2,9, 16,1996 with the County Clerk of Beach,CA 92648 Hussien Sibai, 12726 Cur- y Orange County on 4-5-96 This .business is con- tis King #c, Norwalk, CA 19963679235 ducted by:an individual 90650 PUBLIC NOTICE H.B. Independent April 18, Havo you started doing This business is con- business yet.'YEs ducted by:an individual Fictitious Busines 25,May 2,9,1996 043-418 Nigel N.Dix � Have you started doing Name Statement PUBLIC NOTICE This statement was filed business yyet?No The following persons with the County Clerk of Hussien Sibai doing business as: Act Fictitious Business Orange County on 4-16-96 This statement was filed land Service, 17082 En Name Statement 19963680314 with the County Clerk of aid Ln., Apt. D, HuntinSI The following persons are H.B. Independent April 25, Orange County on 4-19-96 Beach,CA 92642 - doing business as: TRI S 25, May 2,9,16,1996 044- 19963680621 Luis Estrada, 111 Enterprises, 600 E. Bay, 434 H.B.Independent April 25, Mclaren St., Norwalk, Balboa,CA 92661 25,May 2,9,16,1996 044- 90650 Mike Dorney,6142 Eagfec- PUBLIC NOTICE 435 This business is d rest,Huntington Beach,CA Fictitious Business ducted by:an Individual' 92648 Cortney Buhrig, 16811 Name Statement On the move? Hoskins #B, Huntington The following persons are Overstocked with. Beach,CA 92649 doing business as: Wel- Sell your extra stuff? This business is con- come Home Cleaning, A call t0 Convenient 17362 Santa Maria, Foun- household Classified Classified tain Valley,CA 92708 items will help Heather Lynn Barron, 642-5678 642.5678 17362 Santa Maria, Foun- in Classified PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington j Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was. printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: May 9, 1996 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 9, 199 r, at Costa Mesa, California. OLL't, U Signature wi t'."'i-'!TICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES^ PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICE. Irk i UNl'ING•TON BEACH CIII'MUN(AL �,wnrxaOY flrKH CITY OF 111UNTINCTON IIF,ACII SUBJECT: LAND USE 11ECONINIENDATiONS 0F'i'llE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN-CITY OF HUNTINGTON BFACII 10 Intetested Parties ;Lr Oily of I luntinginn Reach('itv('ouncil is hnldinc n.,blic hearings to discuss land use d,anges ptoposed in the contprcncnstve a:,talc ot*:he Genera: '":,n A Gcncra!flan land use designation ntav alter the future use and dccdnp:r.cn:of i;ropcf t,, :n the City Please review the attached table and snap flor proposed changes to the General Plan land use designation of your property or property in your area If you would like to comment on the proposed land use changes,you may either submit a letter . to the Office of the City Clerk and/or attend the scheduled City Council meetings A Cienerai Plan is considered the"constitution"of the City and is a reflection of the citizen's desires and ambitions for the future of i luntington Reach The General Plan is also used to guide the decisions of elected officials and City staff for the next 20 years The existing Creneral Plan was adopted in 1976 and has undergone incremental changes since that lirne Due to changes in community needs, popu!ation demographics,laws,and development patterns,the General Plan is being updated to reflect current conditions The attached table and map provide a brief overview anti location for proposed chanitcs to the Cienerai Plan land use designations -(he uloic describes the existing Gcncra!(Ilan lam;us: designation,General Plan Advisory C'o i,wittee's recommended land use designation,the existing zoning designation,and the Planning Commission's recommended land use designations l he land use changes of the Draft General Plan will be presented at a City Council hearing tentatively scheduled for April 22, 1996,at 5 00 P%1 Final action on the General Plan and land use designations is tentatively scheduled for May 13, 1996 Please contact the Office of ttte City Clerk or the Depattntenl of Community Development to confirm these City Council meeting dates City Council public hearings are held in the following location City of Huntington Beach Civic Center Council Cambers,Lower Level 20DO Main Street Iluntington Beach,CA 92648 ifyou would like additional details on the proposed land use changcs,a copy of the Draft l General Plan maybe purchased for$10 00 in the Department of Community Development A copy of the Draft General Plan is available for review at the following locations Cin of Huntington Beach Cm of Huntington Beach Department of Cnmmunity De,clopment Ofrcc of the Cit)Clcrk 2000 Main Sueci 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach.CA 92648 Huntington Bcaclt,CA 92648 (714)536-5271 (714)536-5227 . Ctn of Huntington Beach Ctly of Huntington Beach Central Lihran Banning A%enuc Branch Ltbran 1 1 I 1 Talbert A\enuc 9281 Bammne A,enue Huntington Beach.CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 (714)842-4481 (714)375-5005 City of Huntington Beach CirY of Iluntington Bcach Graham Street Branch Libmn Main Strcct Branch Lrbran_ 15882 Graham Street 525 Main Street Huntington Reach.CA 92648 Huntington Reach.CA 92648 (714)375-5(106 (714)375-5071 If you have any questions about the General Plan update process,please contact the Department of Community Development at(714)536-5271. Sincerely, Melanie S Fallon Director of Community Development Attachment ALL iNTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the —— application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you maybe limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to the public hearing If there are any further questions,please call the Department of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer to the above items Please direct your written communication to the City Clerk Connie Brockway,City Clerk Regarding the General Plan-Updaic City of llunungton Bench 2000 Main Strcct,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92648 i (714)5 36-522 7 Continued on next page PUBLIC NOTIC95 kua1611114 II gaW-F1 F PUBLIC NOTICE ducted by:co-partners tain Valley,CA 92708 PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started doing This business is con- Fictitious Business business yet?No ducted by:an individual Fictitious Business Name Statement Mike Dorney Have you started doing Name Statement The following persons are This statement was filed business yet?Yes The following persons are doing business as: A+ with the County Clerk of Heather L Barron doing business as: H-E Transmissions, Inc., 7542 Orange County on 5-3-96 This statement was filed Consulting, 18141 Bead Warner Ave., Huntington 19963682155 with the County Clerk of Blvd, Ste. 200, Huntingtor Beach,CA 92647 H.B. Independent May 9, Orange Ccunty on 4-19-96 Beach,CA 92648 A+ Transmissions, Inc., 16,23,30,1996 052-566 19963680631 Peter Mazzola 18141 7542 Warner Ave.,Hunting- H.B. Independent April 25, Beach Blvd, Ste.200,Hun ton Beach,CA 92647 PUBLIC NOTICE 25, May 2,9, 16,1996 044- tington Beach,CA 92648 This business is con- Fictitious Business 441 This business Is con •ducted by:a corporation ducted by:an individual Have you started doing Name Statement PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started doinc business yet?yes The following persons are business yet?Yes i Eleonore Hepprich, Presi- doing business a s: Fictitious Business Peter S.Mazzola dent Artquest,8248 Atlanta Ave., Name Statement This statement was filet This statement was filed #A, Huntington Beach, CA The following persons are with the County Clerk o' f with the County Clerk of 92646 doing business as: Pristine Orange County on 4-19-96 Orange County on 4-19-96 Duncan & Shu-Ling Bene- Air, 19572 Aragon Circle, 19963880625 19963680645 dict,8248 Atlanta Ave.,#A, Huntington Beach, CA- H.B. Independent April 25, H.B. Independent April 25, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 25, May 2,9,16,1996 044• 25, May 2,9,16, 1996 044- 92646 Patricia L.Rountree,19572 437 443 This business is con- Aragon Circle, Huntington ducted by: husband and Beach,CA 92646 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE wife This business is con- Have you started doing ducted by:an individual Fictitious Business Fictitious Business business yet?no Have you started doing Name Statement Name Statement Duncan J.Benedict business yet?No The following persons are This statement was filed PatriciaRountree The following persons are doing business as: Priority k t with the County Clerk of This statement was filed doing business as: Con- One, 8907 Warner Ave., struction Product's Unlim- Orange County on 4-25-96 with the County Clerk of Huntington Beach, CP ited, 3392 Sparkler Dr., 19963681350 Orange County on 4-19-96 92647 Huntington Beach, CA H.B. Independent May 9, 19963680659 Muhan, Inc., 8907 Warnei 92649 16,23,30,1996 052-576 H.B. Independent April 25, Ave., Huntington Beach, Alisa Lynn Claus, 3392 25, May 2,9, 16, 1996 044- CA 92647 Sparkler, Huntington PUBLIC NOTICE 445 This business is con. Beach,CA 92649 ducted by:a corporation This business is con- Fictitious Business PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started doing ducted by:an individual Name Statement business yet?No Have you started doing The following persons are Fictitious Business Byeong C.Choi,President business yet?No doing business as: J-K Name Statement This statement was filed Alisa Lynn Claus Property Management, 915 The following persons are with the County Clerk of This statement was filed Lake, Huntington Beach, doing business as: JPA Orange County on 4-19-96 with the CountyClerk of , CA 92648 Consultants,9710 Marigold Jerry McKinish, 915 Lake, g 18963680847 Orange County on 4-19-96 ry, Ave, Fountain Valley, CA H.B. Independent April 25, 19963680007 Huntington Beach, CA 9P708 92648 John Paul Avanzino, 9710 25,May 2,9,16, 1996 044• H.B. Independent April 25, This business Is con- 441 25, May 2,9, 16, 1996 044- Marigold Ave,Fountain Val- . ducted by:an individual ley,CA 92706 PUBLIC NOTICE 452 Have you started doing This business is con- PUBLIC NOTICE business yet?No ducted by:an individual Fictitious Business Jerry McKinish Have you started doing Name Statement Fictitious Business This statement was filed business yet?No • The following persons an with the County Clerk of John Paul Avanzino Name Statement doing business as: C statement was e The following persons Orange County on 4-16-96 Thist filed areFriendly Software, 1840' 249 3 1996680 with the County Clerk of doing business as: Party ty Carnaby Ln., Huntingto+ City Huntington Beach, 19 H.B. Independent April 25, Orange County on 4-19-96 Beach,CA 92648 Anda Lucia, Irvine, CA 25, May 2,9,16,1996 044- 19963680660 Carla Apodaca, 1840' 92714 432 H.B. Independent April 25, Carnaby Ln., Huntingtoi Anda6'Lucia,CA corp"Irvine, CA PUBLIC NOTICE 25, May 2,9,is, 1996 04 6 Beach,This business Is con 92714 ducted by:an individual This business Is con- Fictitious Business PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started dolnl ducted by:a corporation Name Statement business yet?No Have you started doing The following persons are Fictitious Business Carla Apodaca business yet?No doing business as: Mimi's Name Statement This statement was files Marion Lepson, Secy.! Jewelry, 18591 Brookhurst The following persons are with the County Clerk c Treas. St, Fountain Valley, CA doing business as: Classic Orange County on 4-19-96 This statement was filed 92708 Cleaning Agency, 3419 Via 1996368066e with the County Clerk of Mimi Truong, 9912 New- Lido#137,Newport Beach," H.B. Independent April 2: Orange County on 4-15-96 castle Ave, Westminster, CA 92663 25, May 2,9,16,1996 04� 19963680073 A s2683 business is con, Diane Ryder, 3419 Via y 44 H.B. Independent April 25, Lido#137,Newport Beach, ducted by:an individual CA 92663 25, May 2,9, 16,1996 044- Have you started doing This business is con- PUBLIC NOTICE 454 business yet?Yes ducted by:an individual Fictitious Business PUBLIC NOTICE Mimi Truong Have you started doing Name Statement This statement was filed business yet?No The following persons a Fictitious Business with the County Clerk of Diane Ryder doing business as: Se Orange County on 4-16-96 This statement was filed Name Statement tiago V. Landscape, 78 The following persons are 19963680239 with the County Clerk of Newman Ave., Huntingt doing business as: A) H.B. Independent April 25, Orange County on 4-19-96 Beach,CA 92647 Kibler Contracting & Con- 25, May 2,9, 16,1996 044- 19963680667 Santiago Virgilio, 78 sulting, B) American Medi- 433 H.B. Independent April 25, Newman Ave., Huntingt cal Office Software, 18864 25,May 2,9, 16,1996 044- Beach,Ca 92647 Carolyn Lane, Huntington PUBLIC NOTICE 450 This business is co Beach,CA 92646 ducted by:an individual Jeffrey P. Kibler, 18861 Fictitious Business PUBLIC NOTICE Have you started dot Carolyn Lane, Huntington Name Statement business yet?Yes Beach,CA 92646 The following persons are Fictitious Business Santiago Virgilio This business .is con- doing business as: N.W. Name Statement This statement was fie ducted by:an individual Dix&Associates, 418 Cali- The following persons are with the County Clerk Have you started doing fornia St. #B, Huntington doing business as: Mail Orange County on 4-16-91 business yet?Yes Beach,CA 92648 Boxes Etc..., 200 Main St. 1 996 3 6802 1: Jeffrey P.Kibler Nigel W. Dix, 418 Cali- #104, Huntington Beach, H.B. Independent April 2 This statement was filed fornia St. #B, Huntington CA 92648 25, May 2,9, 16,1996 04 with the County Clerk of Beach,CA 92648 Hussien Sibai, 12726 Cur- Orange County on 4-5.96 This business is con- tis King #c, Norwalk, CA 4' 19963679235 ducted by:an individual 90650 PUBLIC NOTICE H.B. Independent April 18,< Have you started doing This business is con- 25,May 2,9,1996 043 418 business yet:Yes ducted by:an individual Fictitious Business 8e Dix Have you started doing Name Statement PUBLIC NOTICE This statement was filed business et?No The following persons a with the County Clerk of Hussien Sibai doing business as: Aqu Fictitious Business Orange County on 4-16-96 This Statement was filed land Service, 17082 Emc Name Statement 19963680314 with the County Clerk of aid Ln., Apt. D, Huntingtc The following persons are. H.B. Independent April 25, Orange County on 4-19-96 Beach,CA 92642 doing business as: TRI S 25, May 2,%16,1996 044- 19963680621 Luis Estrada, 114j Enterprises, 600 E. Bay, 434 H.B. Independent April 25, Mclaren St., Norwalk, C Balboa,CA 92661 25,May 2,9, 16, 1996 044- 90650 Mike Dorney,6142 Eaglec- PUBLIC NOTICE 435. This business is cc rest, Huntington Beach,CA Fictitious Business ducted by:an individual 92648 Cortney Buhrig, 16811 Name Statement On the move? Hoskins #B, Huntington The following persons are Overstocked with Beach,CA 92649 doing business as: Wei- Sell your extra stuff? This business is con- come Home Cleaning, A call to Convenient 17362 Santa Maria, Foun- household Classified Convenient tain Valley,CA 92708 items will help Heather Lynn Barron, 642-5678 642-5678 17362 Santa Maria, Foun- in Classified KELM iMTICES T PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES Continued from previous page PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN 0 _ .1 • � BOLSA < ARGOSY r � x I 80 aO MC FAD EEN2=. 26 ,.. $ � 311 � Z1 I Z(r 2.1 '19',34 EDINGER ' ZI 30 83 91 3 _ Iq Zo 4% I IIAQ_ 74 35 g�31 WARNER 0 7r.T� la Zy t5 M `11 37 `il '15 ♦ �1 SLA FR 9c�♦ • 'il ys. L 95 TALBERT ` •_ ELLIS 0 ° p • 8L' 73 QARFIF.I. 6 ♦ 69 ,o ty yf 8 �e • I '1 7 '3 `4 55 A 84 YORKTOWN Z. i34 y� / A91� ^0 `8 %111 ADAMS at1 It (r0 1i{ O cc' S (9 rZ 68 (01INDIANAPOLIS 4 � • ATLANTA 5l 93 S So Z HAMILTON QO 5 This map presents the general location of - proposed changes to the General Plan I - BANNING land use designations. Please contact the J Department of Community Development 3 for more detail and explanation. Continued on next page vimmWeP B IC I E PUBLIC NS't'ICES Continued from previous page ( I PROPOSED GENERA(,PLAN EXISTING GENERALPLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSIONFIONS i I LAND USE RF.COAII IENDA7TONS NO GF-NEI(AL ADVISORY RE( ."E.NDA" OF TILE UPDATED GENFRAL PLAN PLAN COMMITTEE (Desigmitiona to bee nnaidercd DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 11 11 by the City Council to CO(Commercial CR.F2-1)(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Commercial Regional(CR-F2- General) Regional,Density 0.5 FAR. D) -the following table presents a fist of the properties in Huntington Beach that are recommended to have the I Design Ow la General Plan land use designation changed or altered l he table describes existing General Plan designation,the I I (CG(Commercial CR-F2-D(Commercial CG(Commercial Gcncral) Commercial Regional(CR-F2- General Plan Advisory Committee's recommended land use designations,dhe exisline zoning,and the Planing - I Gencral) Rcgionm],Density 0 5 FAR, D) Commissions recommended land use d"ignations A map,with corresponding numbers,has been included to I- Uest n0rcrtav aid in the location of the affected properties. 12 .CG(Comnrcrcial CR-F2-D(Commercial CG(Commercial Gcnccd) Commercial Regional(CR-F2- Gcncral) Regional,Densuy 0 5 FAR, ) DesignCh crlar) EXISTING GENERA I,PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COM1INISSION a, P.Q-P.P MV-Fit-D(Mixcd Use ITT,(Residential Low Dcosuv). Mixed Use Verlical(MV-F8-DI NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS iPublic. Vertical.Density 1.5 FAR Ili(General Industrial).CG-H PLAN CONiMITFEF. (Designmill-Io he considered Quay+-Pnhlic, IMUL 0 35 FAR ICh 25 (Commercial General-IIigh Rise U ESIGNATION I DESIGNATION by the City Council I Inctitoional)MD un/ac) Ocerlav) I Rf.(Rcsidcntial CN-FI(Commercial CG-FP2(('ona crcial General. Commercial Neighborhood 1 (Mixed (.ow Dcnsn)) Neighborhood.Densitc 0 15 Flocdplam) (CN-Fl) I Ucrclmpnrcni) _ FAR)-_ I-- �2 !RII(Rcsdcntial P(lit I-in)Fnblic- Rif(Residential Ihgh Ucnsity7 Rcsidcn(,al Low w-i1h Pubhc(P) I I ('G I('unmiciciai MV-i')-SP(Mixed Usc CG(Coll em'al(icneral) Commercial Regional-FAR 5- High Dcnsnr) undcriring Residential High designation;decrease in density I Ocmerali- Vertical.Density 1.5 FAR Specific Plan(CR-F2-SP) Dcnsih 30 unrac from 30 to 7 dWac,P(RL-7) IMUl.0.5 FAR ICI.25 { 3 RL(Residential CN-FI(Connneroal CC(ComncrciaV Genera) Commercial Neighborhood uNacl Lnry(knsn) NeiEhbnl hood,Densiq,n 35 (CN-FI) 35 CG(Cormneraal MV-Flo-D-A(Mixed CG-RMII-RM(Commercial Mixed Use Venal.decrease Gcucral)RMH Use Vertical.Density 1.5 General:Residential Medium density from 25 to Is du/ae C I Ill.(Rieidcml:I P(itI -6 51 Pnhlic- RL(Rcsidenlial 1-01r Ucnsrty) Public(P)designation.retain (Residential FAR IMUI.L5 FAR ICI.25 High Dcnsih;Residential Loa Dcnrnr Medium IIrg b f h dn/ac.Design Oacrlay.Auto Medium Density) ) undcda mg Lew Uciiciry maximum 7(1 duiac I -- n Rcsdcmial,(5 uu!ac I I{ Dcnsd lT x)RM -site}') f5 Iiecrrmno i P(I'uhhq RA-RI.(Residential Pubhc(P)desigmlion I. I(Residential Agncultinc,Residential Low idemifv utility right of nay .fediurn Density) r I _Ueusih•Z I 3( ('G(Commercial MV-Fin-D-A(Mixed CG-RM(Commercial 6-cr.J, Mixed Use Verfical,decrcaic i. I2L ritesldcuual I('N-PI(C'omnie-al CG-I:P2(C'anniercia(Genera n- Conocc eril Nenghborlm, I Ge col)RM Use Vertical,Dcnsiry 1 5 Residemial Medium Deirsn)) density from 25 to 15 duiac Inn Dcnstr) I Ncighhcrhnod.Dcnsily 015 Floa{phlin) (CN-FI) 'iResidential FAR IMUI.1.5 FAR ICI,25I FAR) I % RI.(fie-i-lud CN-1:1(Commercial Q-(G-FP2(Qualified. Colimcrcial Ncighhorhad Medium Dcnsih) didac.Design Ocerlav,Auto Lrna Dcnsna) Ne.ghtimhcxd,Density 035 Commercial General. (CN-Fl) �_ Ocerlar) FAIT) Flood lain) :7 I CG(Conmcieial MV-FTo-D(Mixcd Use RM(Residen(ial Mcdium h1txcd Use Vertical,decrease ') TINT(Rcsidcnual OS-P(Open Space-Park) OS-PR-FP2(Open Space. Open Space-Park(OS-P) Gcneml)RM Vertical,Dcnsily 1.5 FAR Densih) density from 25 to 15 du/ac hicdinm Daaih l Parks and Recreation. I iRcsidanial IMUI.1.5 FAIR ICI,25- i I i 1ledmm Dcnsnr dntac,Design Overlay) I - _tI PloOdplain) I 1 RM(icsidenua CN-f!-D IComnrercial I CG(Commercial Gc,a ab Commercial Neighborhood tX Rif(Rcsidcnual P(RMH-25)Public- RMH(Residemkal Medium High Residential Medium High Medium Dcnsna) NcighbOrhmd_Dcnsily(1.35 (CN-FI-D) Iheh Density) a lder)ying Residential Densih) Density and add Public(P) _ FAR.Desgn Chalet( I Mcdium Iligh Density.25 I designation,does decrease 1, 11 RSI iResrdemial�OS-P(O ';pace-Park) RM-Il Rcsidcnual llednnn Open Space-Park(OS-P) I ++utac) densuc from 3-(0 25 duiac i pen, 1 pc ',led, Ucnsua) Dcs,h.OJ Oa alas) -L-- f 1 :li\i(Rcctdcut+:d -I Si I'nh;ic- RM Ifics+dcn(m!h1eJ+uu+ Ribiic,P) s't \bxed Use RM l-25(Residential Q-R111{IQtmlilied.Rcsidcnual Rcsidcmial Alediwn High Medmm Density) uadc,h eng Rcsidcntial Densitc) h1cdinm i Iigh Dcusib-.25 Mcduun High Dcnsih) Dcnsuv 25 didac � ! ed-mm Dmsar,IS lava un/ac) M --F- -- I !o Comnrcrcial I RM-15 lRcsdcnlial OP(Office Profession,]) ('omnicrcial General•F.AR 35 , Rht Residential P(Rhl-15)Public- RM(Rcsidcnual Medium i Public(P) I-General Medu n Uensilr) (CG-FI) Mcdium Dcnsirv) imdcrh mg Residential DcnsuN-) i _ Meduun Dcnsnr 15 imix - -- I a Ili(Industrial P Ih Public-underlvin IL(Industrial Limited) Public(I') 41 ('G(Cnmurerc.l III -to(Itesidenlial High CG H'onunercial Gcucral) Commercial Gcneml-FAR 35 g (Gcncral) Ucnsily.10 un/ac) (CG-FI) �- Gcnerab {Industrial 32 a RM!Residential P(Public)-designation to I CG(Commercial General) Public(P) ' �Mcdwm Dcnsih rel)cct h�ital __ 3 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO GF,NERAL ADVISORY RECOM1iMENDATIONS NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS NI COMMITTEE, (Designations to be considered PLAN COhIMI"FI'EE (Designations to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the Cit j Council DESIGNATION DESIGNATION- by the City Comicil Ili. Mixed MID-Ft-30-SP(Mixed Pacifica Communily.Plan Mixed Use and add Specific 43. RM(Residential RMH-25(Residemial RM-RMH(Residential Residential Medium Density 15 Dcidopmcm Use Horizontal,Dcnsny L0 Plan(SP) Mcdium Dcnsily) Medium High Density,25 Mcdium Dcnsih:Residential dWac FAR.10 un/ac,Specific uNae) Medium High DensityL_ Plan) 44. RM(Rcsidcmial Rif-30(Re,idcmml High RM-RMH(Residential Residential Medium Density IS k ial P(RMII-25)Public- RMI I(Residential Mcdium I Iigh Public(P)designation,increase 33edmm Ucnsily) Dcnsily.311 uNae) Mcdium Ucnsily:Rit%;) al dWazMcdium Ihgh Dcnsilp)Mcdium Densitc) undmhing Residemial Density) drnsih'from IS l0 25 dWac45 RM(Rcsidcmial CG-rl(ConunerciA RM(Residential Medmm Commercial Gcneml(CG-FI) Medmm I hg0 Dcnsih•25unia.- -_ hfedimn Ucusity (icneral,Ucnsur I1.35FAR-RM(Residential OS Park(Open Space.Park) OS-PR(Open Space•Parks and Open Sparc-Park(OS-P) "16. RM(Rcsidcntial All-vl IltesiJenbal Ihgh RM(Rcsidcnual Medium I2esidemiai Medium Ucnsily IS Medium Dcnsily) Recreation) Mcdium Density Density,30 un/ac Density dWac 19. Rif,(Residential RM-15(Rcsidcntial RMP(Residettal Manufactured Residential Low Density 7 0. 47 ItM(Residential P(Rif-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Rcsidenlial Medium Density 15 Low Icnsty) Mcdium Density I5 uNae) Ilow Park) duiac and add Mobile Ilome Medmm Dcnsirv) undcriring Residential I Iigh Dcnsily) duiac and add Public(P) i- Park Chcday Dcnsih,30 uu/ac 49 RM(Rcsidcnual P(RI I-10)Public- RM(Rcsidcntial Medium Residential Medium Ucnsily 15 20. IRL(Residential P(RI.-6.5)Public- RL(Residemial Low Uensit}9 Pubhc(P)designation,rein Mcdium Dcnsirv) underlying Residential High Icnsih) duiac and add Public(P) Low Dcnsiy) undcrhnng Residential Low maximum 7.0 du/m Densd 30 un/ac) i Densih 6.5 a lac) - 49 RM(ResidemmI P(RH-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density 15 i I SR Sc"` RMH-25(Residential (Q)RMH(Qualified, Senior Residential to Residential Medium Density) underlying Residential High Densty) didac and add Public(P) Rcsidcnual) Medium High Dcnsily 25 Residential Medium High) Medium High(RNIH-25) Dcusin•,30 uNae) - un/ac) 50. RM(Residential CN-F I(Commercial RM-FP2(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Dcnsirv) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 Density,FI(adplain) (RM-15)and Commercial 22 f-G ICmnnwrcial FT(N-F1)Pnhlic- CG(Commercial Gcucral) Public(li) FAR Nci hborhoed CN-FI _ Gcner,J) uu forking('onnuercial - 51 ('G(Commercial RM-I S(liesidenlial CG-FP2(Comnrercia(General. Commercial Gcneml(CG-FI) Ncighharhom Dcnsih u.3s Gcneml) Mcdium Dcnsil-,IS uNae Flood plain) FAR 52 RL(Residential CN-1:1(Commercial CG(Commercial Gcncral) Residential low Density 7.1) 23 Industrial- hill-FI-30-SP(Mixed M2-01-CZ:R4-O-CZ:Cl Mixcd-Use Horimmal; L..Dcnsih) Neighborhood.FAR 0 15) - du/ac,requested Historic Rcpnn Resource Use Harimmal.Densmc 0.35 -O CZ(Industrial General.Oil recommend F2-30(.5 FAR.IT to add Historic Overlay Pinduclinn FAR.30 uNae,Specific 10ccrlac,Cmsal Zone: dNac),recommend"average" 51 OS-C(Open Space RL-6.5(Residential Low LUD-CZ,-FP2(Limited Use Open Space Conservation(OS- plan) _ Residential High Density,Od densily of 15 cin/ac -Consenal ion) Density,6.5 uNae) Dis(ficf.Coastal Zone, C) 0,crlay.Coastal Zone; Float lam) Commercial Neighborhood,Oil 54. RM(Residential RL-6.5.1RH-30 Magnolia Pacific Specific Plan Residential Medium Density 15 Oacrla'.Coastal Zone) Mcdium Density) (Residential Low Dcnsily, du)ac designation and add 24. IG(Industrial RM-15(Residential IG(Industrial General) Residential Low Density 7 0 6.5 uNae,Residential High Specific Plan Overlay _ Genera[) Medium Density,IS u V c) duiac Density,30 uNae nI - 55 RL 1Rcsidcntia] RM-15(Rcsidcntial RMP(Residential Manufactured Rcsidenlial Low Density 7.0 25 IG(industrial I-F2-H(Indusirial,Dcnsily IL(Indusirial Limited) add Historic(herlav Low Dcnsnv) Medium Density,15 uNae) Home Park) didac dcsignmion and add General) 0.5 FAR,I]islorical Oscriav) Mobile Home Overlay 26 RL(Residential P(RI.-5.5)Public- RI,(Residential Low Density) Public(P)designation;rcun 56 CG(Commercial RM-15(Residential CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG-FO Low Density) nndcrh ing Residential Low maximum 7 0 du/ac General Medium Density.15 un)ac designation • - Densit 6.5 un/ac i 57 CG(Commercial Rif-30(Residential High Rif(Residential High Densilv) Residential Medium Density 15 27 RL(Residential P(RL-6.5)Public- RL(Residential Low Density) Public(P)designation,retain Gencral) Dcnsily,ill antic) dWac Low Dcnsily) mrdcriving Rcsidenlial Low maximum 7.0 duiac _ Density 6.5 uNae RM(Residential Rif-30(Residential High Rif(Residential I hgh Density) 2X RM(ResidentialCN-FI(Commerc onmrc al CG(Commercial Gcncral) Ceal NcighMrhood Mcdiwn Density tensi(I,30 un/ac) Medium Densilv) Neighborhood,Dcnsih-0.35 (CN-FI) L- FAR I 5F. CG mia(Commercial RMII-25(Residel CG(Commercial G.-I) Commercial General(CG-FI) 24. P.Q-P.I(Public, P(CG-F 1)Public- PS(Public Semi Public) Commercial General(CG-FI) - General) Medium High Density,25 Quasi-Pubhc, underriug Commercial and add Public(P)designation uNae - - 60 Plumed General. -al(Commercial CG(Comnrcrcial General) Mixcd Use and add Specific Institution.]) General,Dcrosity 0.35 FAR) Communih General,Density(t.35 FAR Plan Orecrla 2 4 Continued on next page NBLIC OTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES Continued from previous page FXIS7 ING (:F:N FRAI.PLAY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLA*', 'COMI S11cSION NO GENF.RAI. ADVISORY RF.COM MENDATIONS NO GFNERAL ADVISORY R. 0.1131F.NDATIONS PIAN (0MN1fffF.F: (Dc+ignNtinos la tic canxideml PLAY ('0NIMITiFF. (Deaignminm to he nm+idcrrd U F.SI(:NAI ION URSIGNAII(yN In Ih.L(:Iq uuncil) DESIGNATION DESIGNATION by the Cil Council GI RM IitS,Ja,6ai P(CN-1)Public- RM111-A(Residential Medium Residential Medium Ili li �"� �-`-'� 1 M 91 Mrxcd RMII-7u(Residential Nonh I luntrnglon('enter - Mixed Ux and add Spcafic I Medium Ucnst%) in(kilying Commercial High Density,Small Lot dcnsnv and add Public(P) Des clopmenl Medium Ihgh Deosry 10 Spcelfic Plan Plan(SP)designation fl Ne,ghbortalod.Dens,ly n 15 Sc)di•incU d,✓ae FAR. 92 RM(Rcsidcnlial P(RMI-15)Public• RM f licsidcnlial Mcdmm Residentral Mcdmm Icnsrw I I'lRl.-22)hdthc• Mcdnun Densw) undcrh oig Rex,dcnual (coati)) dsue and add SMufic Plan(r P, indcrl)ing Rctidcn(ill losv� Medium - Den sity�IS dWx dcci•ninon Dens.Y. 91 Plaunntg Relent: I-F2-D(Industrial. MI•A-O-CC-C7.-FP2 Agrcc with Scoff,recOmmeod 22 un/ae Denvh n+VAR.I)c+,w- (I l nunnl.Od('c Ln. relan,eciahnµ Jn,gnaGn„a ac 1.2 Mixed RMII-25-0(Residenlwat CGIRMII•A(Commcrcml Mixed Use l 1.-Omal(MI I-FI- O,c'la)) Ca sml(-ocean-am o cu m ed l, ,,Ct recomend 1))the Cnldoru,a Ikvclopmcm Medium Ii,gh[)cosily.25 General/ 25) /nc.H.Al'imo) Cnlxlal Col 'i.1 _ mJx,Iks,gn Oceday) Rusderci(al Medium High A RL(Resideut,al P(C-G-FI)R,hhe- CG/RA(C'm, el :d Gamed/ ('muu,ereial General(CG-F t i 1 _ Dcnsil Small Lot Subdistrict) I rn I)c 1 1'.1,inn C n umw,o:,l Itc.,,k,�li:d Agi-iln,rcl nd:Wd hd'hc(P)'l a g"..1 I 61 RM(Residcnoll CN-FI-1)(Cmmneraal CG(Commcrcml General) Commercial Ncighborhoal Gnmm1.1)cosily(1 15 FAR n J Mcdmm Denslid Neighborhood,f)cnxnvR 35 (CN-FI) "t III-(Itccidcmill Wewu,half- - 1(T•-FI I'S(1'„hhe Senn I'nhhe) IieaJenual I nu Density FAR.Des,go Owen,, 1 caws Uciiairc) l(-munlcrcul("C—al. dcsig„atiou (R(A RM es Icunll CN-FI-D(C ommercial CG(Cou,mcreial General) Residential Medium Iligh I7ena15 n 15 FAR). Medium Densq-) Ndgl,borhood. )Cnsily 0 15 Density 25 dulac and m add Public Llsie h.11f-RL-6 5 FAR Ocsi a(halal P (Residential tow Density 6 5 65 OP(ORxc MC-Fit-SP(Mixed Use CO-O(Commercial office.Oil Commercial Offer(CO-F2) du/at Piofess—)) Ven,cal.Dcnsil%1 5 FAR 0xedayl designation and,emmc Spectfte 'Ni RL(Residential P(RL 6 5)Public- RL(Residential Lmy Ucnsn)-) Residential Low Densit%7 0 tntUl_0 15 FAR ICI.25 Plan Lmy Dcnsm) undc,hing Residential Lmv durac and add Public(P) du/ac Density 6 5 du/ae dcsignau in fib P.P-O.I. RI.•6.5(Rcs,dcmialLmv RL-01(RcsidcmulLmv Residcmial Lou Densi(v70 Published Runtinyton Beach-Fountain Valley Independent April 4, 18, May 9, (I'ubhe(huu• Density'.6 5 du/x) Iknsily.Oil(Teri.')) ur✓ac and add Public(P) 1996. Puhtic• designation hpnlulmnal l 67 RM(Res,demfal RL-6.5(Residential low RL(Residential low I)cnsil%) Residcnlial Low Density 7(1 _ _ Mcdimn Iknsiq Density.6-5 ddac) dole 6.1 R11(Rcsdcn„aI P(RMt-15)Public. Holly Scxhrf Specific Plan Resolenu d Medium Icnsry 15 hied„tin 1)cnary) li elating Reci kmial (Residcnncil Medicine l)Losty)V du/ac lnd add Specific Plan(SP) _ Mcdimn ikusol�Is dwac -1) 7ti I(.(Indusnal RM-IS(Rcs,dcn(m1 IC✓11.(ti il,wrol General/ Industrial(IG-F2) Gcncml Mcdmm Density 15 du/x) Indusmal I.imiled 71 N1,xed P(MH-PI-),/.SP)Public Pacifica Communin Plan Mixed Use.add Specific Plan Doclnpmcm -undcrymg M,xcd Use (SP) Horironlil.Dco,m 10 FAR. 10 un/ac.Specific Plan 72 Mhxcd CG-F2-D(Commercial CO(Commercial Office) ?,fixed Use Horizontal.decrease Dexclnpnvill Central.Donsne 0 5 FAR. density from 25 to 15 du/ac Desigu Oreroy) 71 RL(Residential P(Rl.-6 5)Public- RL(Res,den(ial I.ow Dcnsil)) Residential low Densiy 7.0 Los.Dc„sny) nndolxmg Rcsidemml Low dine,add Public W) Dent%6 5 duJac -74 RM(Rcs,dcnn:d P(RMII[-2s)Public- RMII(Resilcunal MWum,Ihgh Rcsidcntml Medium Dcnsil%15 Medium 1)cnsn(%) underlying Rcsidemial Dens)ly) dWx and add Public(P) Mtediunt high Dcnsil)25 ddx 75 OS-R CV-F I(('omnler'at CF C -CZ Open Space RecMilion and add 'Open Spacc- Visitor.Denny 0 75 FAR) (Community Facilities.Gvic Public(P)designation RCCt('ilidn Uses Coastal Zone 76. RM(Residential RL b 5(Residential Low RI-C7.(Residential low Residential Low Density 7 0 Medium DeWitt) Dcnsil)6 5 ddx Dcnsil.Coastal Zone du/ae 5 EXISTING GENi:RAL PLAN EXISTING U)NING PLANNING COMMISSION NO GENF.RAI, ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PIAN COMMIT["EF. (Drsignaiinns to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 11 by the Cit-Council) 77. Mixed Use RM.15.CR-FI-SP Ilunttngton Itarbout Bay Club Mixed Use and add Specific (Residential Medium Density Specific Plan Plan(SP)designation I du/ac.Commercial Regional.Density 0 33 FAR Solve' Man 79 OS-R(Open RI--,5(Residential In,, RL-FP2(Rcsidentlat Low Open Space-Park(OS-P) Spam- Dousn)6 5 d dac) Dcnsil)•Floodphin)RA-CZ Reclean-) (Rel dcm,aI Agnndhnr. Consml Zone) 71) Planned CG.RM-15.RL-6 5 Meadowlark Spccil'rc Pin Mixed Use and add Spoific Coni n (Cmumem"l C—m. Pin(SP)dmignalinn Rcsidcnlial Mcdinu,Density IS dulac.Residential low Dcnsitv 6.5 du/ac to) iG(Industrial P(1)Public-underlying 1L(Industrial Limited) Industrial(1-F2) Cenral) lrditun.1 81. Residential RL.6 5(Residential Low Ellis Golden West Specific Plan Pesidenlial FSMIC 1 dulaa Esoic;I du/ac Dcnsil 6-+du/x 82 Resideinial Psute, RL-6 5(Residential Lmv (lolly Scich1T Specific Plan Residential Elute a du/=and I rh✓lc and OPcn DensK 6 5 ddx)and Open (Residential IDensity J OPen Space-Park designations S xc-Rttrc lion S ¢-Park uri c k n S _) MI. IG(Industrial CR-F2-U(Conintercml IG(Miturtal Gcncrall Commercial Regional(CR-1`2- Geneml) Regional.Dcnclw o 5 FAR. D) _ I)c:n ntTcrlawl ____ N.1 Mixed I Ise I-1.2,-D(hducui:d I I-I Induzin,al I.in„iedl Iidugr,:il(14F2-0) Iknvlw R 5 VAR.Dcsgn _ 0,c,I.n NS 1 Mixed Use CO•Fa(Comncrcml URim. North Iiuntinglon Cenler Mixed Use and add Specific Uens'ty 1 25 FAR) Specific Plan area Plan SP dcsi h.7tom Mfi Mixed Ilse CG-F I(Cmmn,craal 0.11.((hnhficd-Ind,nirmi Industrial(1-FI or F2) Crcncill, j 0 Ucns,r 5 FAR) Limited ill CG(Commcrcml RH--10(Residential 11,gh CG(Commelcial General) Commercial General(CG-FI) (icncmp Dcnsilv In un/ac) 98 CG(Commercial RI -to(Residential High CG(Commercial Gc•icral) Commercial General tCG.FI) l (kncrnl) IknsnLun/.lc _ M9 RL(Rcaidcntial RL-6 5(Rcsidcm,al Low RI-0•CZJRI.(Residential Open Spacc-P ark(OS-P) Low Denial) Density 6.5 du/ac) Low Density,Od Coaxial 7Anc/Rcs,dtnli.it Low _ Dcnsil% •m I)O.S-I'd)pcn MI i-F2-255.SP(.l,+ed 1)IIA•O-CC-CZ.FP2 Agree ssith Staff,recommend Sr.,rr. rx rW.,inur..1.Dcnsil)0 5 (Rczidcol,al Agnodn✓c,Oil rciai„cxnnn¢dcain,u„o.. - ti,nccnaGou.1J FAR.25 d,uoc.Specific (Tcrh%.Coaxal Co--tin. coded b)the Cnliforma - I VSC I V-1or Plan) Coeval Zone.Hondplam Coastal Commission Scnmg 2)VSC-CZ-FP2 Visitor Cnim,Icncill) Scn Ing Comula vial.C'oavll I)R s)RM Zone Floodplam (Rtsitkntial 1)N11-VZ-FP2 t%ioh,lc Mcdmm Dcnsny) I home.Cnldal 7nnc.Ftmdplam )) MI-A-O-C7-FP2 IlnJucdnal l.indhd.OJ(Teri.,,. .— _ —1_ _____1(o.15la1 Zaric,F7ond�lamZ _, - PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was. printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: May 9 , 1996 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 9 , 1996 at Costa Mesa, California. Signature ' t City of Huntington Beach • General Plan Update d HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Review Schedule February 23, 1995 The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is t a"constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments, please utilize the following schedule(See reverse side for more information): Study Session #1 e-Economic Development Element Held February 26, 1996 Study Session#3 Study Session #2 5:00 P.M. April 8, 1996 -.-Review March 25, 1996, actions 5:00 P.M. March 11, 1996 -.-Review❖Circulation Element :•Overview ❖Land Use Element •:•Major issues ❖Land Use Map :•Environmental Impact Report :•Urban Design Element PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2 •:•Historic and Cultural Resources Element 5:00 P.M. April 22, 1996 -.-Recreation and Community Services Element ❖Introduction ---Public Facilities and Public Services Element ❖Public Hearing Procedure •:Environmental Resources and Conservation Element ❖Circulation Element -Economic Development Element .-Land Use Element PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 •:•Land Use Map 5:00 P.M. March 25, 1996 Final Study Session#4 •:Overview 4:00 P.M. May 6, 1996 •:Public Hearing Procedure :•Review April 22, 1996, actions •:•Environmental Impact Report •:•Outstanding Issues •:•Air Quality Element .,Review final action on the EIR •:•Noise Element •..Review final action on General Plan.•Environmental Hazards Element .-Hazardous Materials Element FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO. 3 :•Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 -:-Urban Design Element ❖Introduction .-Recreation and Community Services Element ❖Public Hearing Procedure .•Historic and Cultural Resources Element •:•Final action on Outstanding Issues .-Public Facilities and Public Services Element .•Final Action on the Circulation Element -:-Environmental Resources and Conservation Element .-Final action on the Land Use Map •:Housing Element .•Final Action on the Land Use Element •:Growth Management Element •:•Final action on the EIR ,-Coastal Element •:•Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered 92648. The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions, please call the Department be held in Room B-8, both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note: due to the amount of information, any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway, City Clerk alternate dates. In addition, scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic, time, and date, please contact 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach, CA 92648 at (714) 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 536-5227 (714) 536-5227. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1, the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted, the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation, air quality, and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council, the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. •.I1 � City of Huntington Beach• General Plan Update �o t"f z� ,�� s City Council Review Schedule HUNTINGTON BEACH "J January 31, 1995 The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the "constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments, please utilize the following schedule(See reverse side for more information): Study Session #1 •:Urban Design Element 5:00 P.M. February 26, 1996 •:Recreation and Community Services Element .:.Introduction to a General Plan -:-Historic and Cultural Resources Element •:What is a General Plan :•Public Facilities and Public Services Element .:.Environmental Impact Report •:•Environmental Resources and Conservation Element •:How the General Plan was updated •:Housing Element •:Update Schedule •sGrowth Management Element -:-Organization of the General Plan •-.Coastal Element •:Goal, Policy, and Objective :•Economic Development Element :•Major Recommendations of the General Plan :•Housing Element Study Session#3 5:00 P.M. Apri18, 1996 •:Growth Management Element •:•Review March 25, 1996, actions :-Coastal Element •:Air Quality Element :•Circulation Element :-Land Use Element :•Noise Element :•Land Use Map :•Environmental Hazards Element :-Hazardous Materials Element PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2 -:-Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. April 22, 1996 -.Introduction Study Session#2 •:•Public Hearing Procedure 5:00 P.M. March 11, 1996 :•Overview -Circulation Element •:Land Use Element 14ajor issues :•Land Use Map -:-Environmental Impact Report Urban Design Element Final Study Session#4 :•Historic and Cultural Resources Element 4:00 P.M. May 6, 1996 -Recreation and.Community Services EIement •*.Review April 22, 1996, actions Public Facilities and Public Services Element :Outstanding Issues :-Environmental Resources and Conservation Element .-Review final action on the EIR :•Economic Development Element -.-Review final action on General Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO. 3 5:00 P.M. March 25, 1996 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 •:Overview :•Introduction -'Public Hearing Procedure •.-.Public Hearing Procedure -Environmental Impact Report •:Final action on Outstanding Issues Air Quality Element :-Final Action on the Circulation Element :•\noise Element .Final action on the Land Use Map Environmental Hazards Element :•Final Action on the Land Use Element :•Hazardous Materials Element •:Final action on the EIR Utilities Element .•Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered 92648. The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions, please call the Department be held in Room B-8, both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note: due to the amount of information, any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway, City Clerk alternate dates. In addition, scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic, time, and date, please contact 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach, CA 92648 at (714) 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 536-5227 (714) 536-5227. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1. the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations: Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted, the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation, air quality, and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council, the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. City of Huntington Beach • General Plan Update HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Review Schedule January 31, 1995 The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the"constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments, please utilize the following schedule (See reverse side for more information): Study Session#1 •:•Urban Design Element 5:00 P.M. February 26, 1996 •:•Recreation and Community Services Element •:•Introduction to a General Plan •:•Historic and Cultural Resources Element •:•What is a General Plan ❖Public Facilities and Public Services Element •:•Environmental Impact Report -:-Environmental Resources and Conservation Element -.-How the General Plan was updated :•Housing Element •-Update Schedule e.Growth Management Element Organization of the General Plan --.-Coastal Element •:•Goal, Policy, and Objective ❖Economic Development Element :•Major Recommendations of the General Plan -Housing Element Study Session#3 5:00 P.M. April 8, 1996 -*•Growth Management Element •:•Review March 25, 1996, actions :-Coastal Element •:•Circulation Element -.•Air Quality Element •:•Land Use Element -.-Noise Element •:•Land Use Map :-Environmental Hazards Element -Hazardous Materials Element PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2 •:•Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. April 22, 1996 •:•Introduction Study Session 42 ❖Public Hearing Procedure 5:00 P.M. March 11, 1996 -*-Circulation Element :•Overview •:Land Use Element .-Major issues •:•Land Use Map -*•Environmental Impact Report -*•Urban Design Element Final Study Session#4 :•Historic and Cultural Resources Element 4:00 P.M. May 6, 1996 -*•Recreation and Community Services Element ❖Review April 22, 1996, actions :-Public Facilities and Public Services Element •:•Outstanding Issues •:Environmental Resources and Conservation Element ❖Review final action on the EIR -*•Economic Development Element :•Review final action on General Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO. 3 5:00 P.M. March 25, 1996 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 •:Overview •:Introduction •:•Public Hearing Procedure •:•Public Hearing Procedure -'-Environmental Impact Report ❖Final action on Outstanding Issues •:•Air Quality Element •:•Final Action on the Circulation Element Noise Element •:•Final action on the Land Use Map •:Environmental Hazards Element -.--Final Action on the Land Use Element :Hazardous Materials Element -*-Final action on the EIR •:Utilities Element -*-Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered 92648. The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions, please call the Department be held in Room B-8, both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note: due to the amount of information, any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway, City Clerk alternate dates. In addition, scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic, time, and date, please contact 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach, CA 92648 at (714) 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 536-5227 (714) 536-5227. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1, the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted, the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation, air quality, and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council, the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. PUBLIC NOTICES BLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES ,r, , City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Review Schedule January 31,1995 TLc City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the"constitution"for the City. The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the su,ccss of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments,please utilize the following schedule(Sec reverse side for more information) Study Session H1 •:•Urban Design Element 5:00 P.M. February 26,1996 *Recreation and Community Services Element ,,Introduction to a General Plan *Ihstoric and Cultural Resources Element W•:• hat is a General Plan *Public Facilities and Public Services Element ,,Environmental Impact Report *Environmental Resources and Conservation Element ;•How the General Plan was updated *Housing Element• - Update Schedule ,Gro%%th Management Element .,Organization of the General Plan *Coastal Element :•Goal,Policy,and Objective *Economic Development Element ,,Major Recommendations of the General Plan Study Session H3 -,Housing Element 5:00 P.M. April g,1996 •,GTO%vah Management Element :Reviav March 25,1996,actions :•Coastal Element -:-Circulation Element .-Air Quality Element •:•Land Use Element --Noise Element vLand Use Map •:•Em•ironmcntal Hazards Element -A laz<ardous Materials Element PUBLIC HEARING NO.2 ,,Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. April 22,1996 •,introduction Study Session N2 •,Public Hearing Procedure 5:00 P.M. March 11.1996 Circulation Element t•Overview -Land Use Element :•I\fajor issues ,Land Use Map :•I:mironmental Impact Report ..-Urban Design Element Final Study Session N4 ;•I ltstoric and Cultural Resources Element 4:00 P.M. May 6,1996 •,Recreation and Commutty Services Element ,Review April 22,1996,actions .-.Public Facilities and Public Services Element ,Outstanding Issues Environmental Resources and Conservation Element :Review final action on the EIR :•Economic Development Element ,Review final action on General Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO.1 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO.3 5:00 P.M. March 25,1996 5:00 P.M. May 13,1996 :•0%crvicsv :.Introduction .--Public I Icaring Procedure .,Public Bearing Procedure c•En ironmcntal Impact Report :•Final action on outstanding Issues :•,\tr Quality Elcmcnt •.Final Action on the Circa ation Elcmcnt -Noise Element :•Final action on the Land Use Map :•Fnvironmanal Ha»rds Element .-•Final Action on the Land Use Element ,I fazartlev.:+i::crials Element ,Final action on the EIR •,Colincs Elcmcnt :•Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC BEARINGS AND S'rUDY SESSIONS ,VI Pubhc'Icarings and Study Sessions: .I be held may be limited to-using only those issues you or in the City:f l Iurtington Acac^.',::vie Censer .- _. .-- ai cd ai the nuhlic hearing desai:xd locate at 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered 92648- The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at,or prior to the public hearing If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions,please call the Department he held in Room B-8,both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note:due to the amount of information,any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway,City Clet k alternate dates- in addition,scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates- To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic,time,and date,please contact 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach,CA 92648 at(714)536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714)536-5227 (714)536-5227. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. Ifyou challenge the City Council's action in court,you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and,therefore,an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No.94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No.94-1,the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations: Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted,the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation,air quality,and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council,the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. _ PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES cant such recordation. Profes- RIGHT TO ENTER UPON address or other common said obligations at the time ded slonal Foreclosure Corpora- THE SURFACE OF THE designation. initial publication of I ent tion as Trustee, 5 Hutton SUBSURFACE OF SAID Said sale will be made Notice is$189,750.29. ge Centre Drive, Suite 1050, LAND ABOVE A DEPTH OF without warranty, express or Dated: 02/06/1996 he Santa Ana,CA 92707,Tele- 500 FEET,AS PROVIDED IN implied regarding title, pos- RESS FINANCI .Of phone Number: (714)432- INSTRUMENTS OF REC- session, or other encum- CORPORATIC iia, 9000,By; BRUCE A.RUSK, ORD. brances,to satisfy the unpaid a California Corporati! EN TRUSTEE SALE OFFICER, The street address or obligations secured by said as Trusl JS- Date: 01/23/96 NPPI0716 other common designation of Deed of Trust, with interest By: Bruce R.Bease N PUB: 02/01/96,02/08/96, the real property hereinabove and other sums as provided Presidi ED 02/15/96 described is purported to be: therein; plus advances, if 17291 Irvine Bouleva N- 6522 HALIFAX DRIVE, any, thereunder and interest Suite 2 I_ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA thereon; and plus fees, Tustin,CA 926 ,D_ PUBLIC NOTICE 92647 charges,and expenses of the Telephone: (714)573-74 °O Loan No.: The undersigned dis- Trustee and of the trusts Fax: (714)573-74: ry. Loan -41,BG4VMAN claims all liability for any created by said Deed of 02,115196,02122196,021291E jC- RESS Order No.: 61588 incorrectness in said street Trust. The total amount of FNSS53413 ID_ A.P.Number: 145-186-03 ICE OF leat y TRUSOTTEE S SALE PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES by UNDER DEED OF TRUST ck YOU ARE IN DEFAULT NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS nal UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, DATED September 7. 1993, MSC-381 ra UNLESS YOU TAKE AC- )n• TION TO PROTECT YOUR Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Ste PROPERTY, IT MAY BE Cali;ornia will receive sealed bids for the reconstruction and improvements Ian SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE. of various local streets in the City of Huntington Beach,California in Is- IF YOU NEED AN EXPLA- accordance with the qualities and specifications and special provisions on ick NATION OF THE NATURE file in the office of the Director of Public Works.Documents will be available the AG THE PROCEEDING on February 9, 1996.A charge of$35.00,not refundable will be required for �o- AGAINST YOU, YOU ry 9 q his SHOULD CONTACT A each set of specifications and accompanying drawings. AD LAWYER. lLL NOTICE IS HEREBY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ESTIMATE 11C GIVEN, that on 03/06/1996, WORK ITEM QUANTITY THE CHAPMAN AVENUE CH A.M.of said day,AT LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENT A T est ENTRANCE TO THE CIVIC 1. Removal and disposal of trees 266 EA. eld CENTER BUILDING, LO- 2. Install root barrier 313 EA. of CATED AT 300 EAST 3. Remove and dispose of curb and gutter- 18,038 L.F. d CHAPMAN AVENUE, OR- 4. Remove and dispose of P.C.C.driveway 49,568 S.F. ANGE, CA, RESS FINAN- 5. Remove and dispose of P.C.C.sidewalk 49,129 S.F. H? CIAL CORPORATION, a 6. Remove and dispose of asphalt concrete 27,007 S.F. California Corporation, 13, duly appointed Trustee undeerr .c 7. Construct P.C.Curb and gutter 18,038 L.F. ton and pursuant to the power of 8. Construct P.C.C.driveway 49,568 L.F. ge, sale conferred in that certain 9. Construct P.C.C.sidewalk 49,129 S.F. per Deed of Trust executed by 10. Construct asphalt concrete 729 TON 72, MATTHEW F. BOWMAN 11. Remove existing curb return 7,772 S.F. %_ AND LEONORA M. BOW- 12. Remove existing cross gutter 2,973 S.F. Df- MAN,HUSBAND AND WIFE 13. Construct curb return w/wheel chair ramp 11 EA. der Recorded on 09/16/1993, 14. Construct cross cutter 2,973 S.F. in Book n/a of Official Rec- ppt 15. Remove existing and install new City ords of ORANGE County, at Bn- furnished water meter boxes 313 EA. page n/a, Recorder's Instru- 16. Remove existing material grading 67,657 S.F. QD ment No. 93-0622437, by 9 9 9 of reason of a breach or default In accordance with the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code,the red in payment or performance of State of California,Director of the Department of Industrial Relations shall the obligations secured �d thereby,including that breach determine the general prevailing rate of wages,applicable to the work to be Aw or default, Notice of which done;copies of the latest general wage rate determinations are on file at the der was recorded 12/15/1994 as office of the City Clerk and the office of the Public Works of the City of of Recorder's Instrument No. Huntington Beach,California. oht Page 6925, in Book L T Quantities ands specifications,together with proposal form,may be obtained at SIn- Page n/a, WILL SELL AT at the office of a Director of Public Works,Ci P Hall,Huntington Beach, In- PUBLIC AUCTION TO THE City 9 gk* HIGHEST BIDDER FOR California. o. CASH, lawful money of the No bid will be received unless it is made on a blank form furnished by the ;w United States, evidenced by Director of Public Works.The special attention of prospective bidders is a Cashier's Check drawn on P P P . Spy a state or national bank, or called to the proposal requirements,set forth in the specifications,for full the equivalent thereof drawn directions as to the bidding. on any other financial institu- The above quantities are approximate only,being given as a basis for the trRy tion specified in section 5102 comparison of bids,and the City of Huntington Beach does not express or ITON of the California Financial P Y 9 P The Code,authorized to do busi- by implications agree that the actual amount of work will correspond d,S- ness in the State of Califor- therewith but reserves that right to increase or decrease the amount of any nia,ALL PAYABLE AT THE class or portion of the work,as may be deemed necessary or expedient by y treat TIME OF SALE,all right,title the Director of Public Works. and interest held by it as `anon Trustee,in that real property All bids will be compared on the basis of the Director of Public Works own situated in said County and estimate of the quantities of work to be done. It be State,described as follows: ment LOT 38 OF TRACT 3893, Substitution of securities for any monies by the City to insure performance id or IN THE CITY OF HUNTING- shall be permitted In accordance with provisions of the California �poe- TON BEACH, AS PER MAP Government Code,Section 4590. ices, RECORDED IN BOOK 150, Each bid shall be made out on a form to be obtained at the office of the rbrct- PAGES 12 AND 13. OF director of Public Works,Development Win 2000 Main Street,Huntington ;}at, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,1N Beach,California;shall be sealed and filed with the City Clerk at the Civic Not, THE OFFICE OF THE tY f, as COUNTY RECORDER OF Center,Second Floor Administration Building,2000 Main Street,Huntington ad- SAID COUNTY. Beach,California,on or before 10:00 a.m.of February 29, 1996,and shall the EXCEPT THEREFROM be opened by the committee composed of the City Clerk,the City Attorney ran,' ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS and Director of Public Works or their authorized representative and the iEtt� AND OTHER HYDROCAR- results of said bidding will be reported to the City Council of Said City of t-and- BON SUBSTANCES LYING Huntington Beach at their regular meeting to be held on Monday,the 4th of said BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 March,1996 at the hour of 7:30 p.m.in the City Council Chambers in the FEET WITHOUT ANY ,wft: Civic Center of said City of Huntington Beach and shall be acted upon by tied. said City Council at the regular meeting of March 4, 1996. I"- t1 � The City of Huntington Beach,California reserves to right to reject any or ''wlloi Repaid{I J all bids and to accept the bid deemed for the best interest of the City of finder Iyaifltbol;4 otl tt Huntington Beach,California. reto- it it, itor By order of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,California this efed tten rem it,look in INFebruary 5, 1996. and a to find the ATTEST: ANW wft you're looking for. Connie Brockway,City Clerk nd a of the City of Huntington Beach ider- 2000 Main Street-2nd Floor of Huntington Beach,California 92648 Sell I1de[tt (714)536-5227 umtr Published Huntington Beach-Fountain Valle Independent February 8,15, *00 22, 1996. 9 Y P rY r PROOF OF PUBLICATION Sry 2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of ' the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, and that attached Notice is a true and complete copy as was printed and published in the Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley issues of said newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: February 15, 1996 I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 15 , 199.�_ at Costa Mesa, California. Signature PUBLIC R„^TICF,S PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES H , City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Ht IrNGTON BEACH City Council Review Schedule January 31,1995 1-he City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the"constitution'for the City- The"constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into abroad set of goals and policies. These politics are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 )cars. Your comments and participation are vital 10 the SUr.ee55 of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments,please utilize the following schedule(Sec reverse side for more information): Study Session H1 +Urban Design Element 5:00 P.M. February 26,1996 *Recreation and Community Services Element :•introduction to a General Plan Alistoric and Cultural Resources Element \Vhat is a General Plan ,Public Facilities and Public Services Element ,,Environmental Impact Report ,Environmental Resources and Conservation Element cliow the General Plan was updated +Housing Element +Update Schedule +Growth Management Element :Organization of the General Plan *Coastal Element ,:.Goal,Policy,and Objective c Economic Development Element ,,Major Recommendations of the General Plan ,.Housing Element Study Session q3 :Growth Management Element 5:00 P.M. April 8,1996 c Review March 25.1996,actions .,Coastal Element :•Air Quality Element ,Circulation Element ,Noise Element ,I-and Use Element ,Land Use Map -,Environmental Hazards Element ,el lazardous Materials Element PUBLIC HEARING NO.2 Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. April 22,1996 ,,Introduction Study Session Y2 ,Public Hearing Procedure 5:00 P.M. March 11,1996 :.Circulation Element :•Or erview :.Land Use Element .Major issues :.Land Use Map :•Emironmental impact Report ---Urban Design Elemcnt Final Study Session H4 :•I Irstoric and Cultural Resources Elemcnt 4:00 P.M. May 6,1996 -,Recreation and Community Services Element :-Review April 22,1996,actions -'-Public Facilities and Public Services Element -Outstanding issues ^Fm ironmental Resources and Consercation_Element :Review final action on the EIR •,Economic Development Element ',Review final action on General Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO.I FINAL PUBLIC iIEARiNG NO.3 5:00 P. I. March 25,1996 5:00 P.M. May 13,1996 <•Or crvicw eIntroduction -Public Hearing Procedure -Public I Iearing Procedure :Fnsironmaual impact Report Final action on Outstanding issues • \rr Quality Elcmcnt -,Final Action on the Circulation Elemcnt -\note Element +Final action on the Land Use'lap A-tiviromnental Hazards Element ,Final Action on the Land Use Element :•llazardous Materials Element .-,Final action on the EIR al'hhucs Element -,Final adoption ofthc General Plan PUBLIC IiEARINGSAVI)SrUDY SESSIONS _� UI Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of 1luntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered 92649. The Public hearings will be held in the to the City at,or prior to the public hearing_ If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions,please call the Department !,c he'd in Room B-8,both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center to the above items. Please direct your written i communications to the City Clerk: Please Note-due to the amount of information,any or a:l of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway,City Clei k alternate dates- In addition,scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic,time,and date,please contact 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach,CA 92648 at(714)536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714)536-5227 (714)536-5227. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report- Ifyou challenge the City Council's action in court,you NOTICE IS IiER.EBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. it was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and,therefore,an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No 94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental impact Report No.94-1,the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted,the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation,air quality,and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council,the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year afler City Council adoption. PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES ,uch recordation. Profes- RIGHT TO ENTER UPON address or other common said obligations at the 1 donal Foreclosure Corpora- THE SURFACE OF THE designation initial publication o1 Ion as Trustee, 6 Hutton SUBSURFACE OF SAID Said sale v.gll be made Notice is$189,750.29. :antra Drive, Suite 1050, LAND ABOVE A DEPTH OF without warranty, express or Dated: 02/06/1996 Tanta Ana,CA 92707,Tete- 500 FEET,AS PROVIDED IN implied regarding title, pos- RESS FINAI shone Number: (714)432- INSTRUMENTS OF REC- session, or other encum- CORPORA XW,By. BRUCE A.RUSK, ORD. brances,to satisfy the unpaid a California Corpo rRUSTEE SALE OFFICER, The street address or obligations secured by said as T Date: 01/23/96 NPP10716 other common designation of Deed of Trust, with interest By: Bruce R-Be / the real property hereinabove and other sums as provided Pre PUB: 01 PUB: 02O1/96,02/08/96, described is purported to be: therein; plus advances, if 17291 Irvine Bou /96 6522 HALIFAX DRIVE, any, thereunder and interest Sul HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA thereon; and plus fees, Tustin.CA PUBLIC NOTICE 92647 charges,and expenses of the Telephone (714)57: Loan No.. The undersigned dis- Trustee ano of the trusts Fax (714)57. 475668-4\BOVVMAtJ claims all liability for any created by said Deed of 02115196,02,22/96.0Z RESS Order W 61588 incorrectness in said street Trust. The total amount of FNS553413 A.P.Nunraar: 145-186-03 NOTICE of TRUSTEE'S SALE PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES PUBLIC NOTICES UNDER DEED OF TRUST — YOU ARE IN DEFAULT UNDER A DEED OF TRUST, NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS DATED September 7, 1993. MSC-381 UNLESS YOU TAKE AC- TION TO PROTECT YOUR Notice is hereby given that the Cihy Council of the City of Hun!ingt^n Bea PROPERTY, IT MAY BE CaVornia will receive sea!ed bids for the reconstruction and im:,c emen SOLD AT A PUBLIC SALE. of various local streets in the City of Huntington Beach,California in IF YOU NEED AN EXPLA- accordance with the qualities and specifcations and special provisions of NATION OF THE NATURE file in the office of the Director of Pubic Works.Documents will be availat AG THE PROCEEDING on February 9, 1996.A charge of$35.00,not refundable will be required AGAINST YOU, YOU �' g q SHOULD CONTACT A each set of specifications and accompanying drawings. LAWYER. NOTICE Is HEREBY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ESTIMATE at GiVEN, that on 03.10611996, WORK jTEM QM-ANT CHAPMAN AVENUE A.M. of said day,AT LOCAL STREET IMPROVEMENT T ENTRANCE TO THE CIVIC 1. Removal and disposal of trees 266 EA. CENTER BUILDING, LO- 2. Install root barrier 313 EA. CATED AT 300 EAST 3. Remove and dispose of curb and gutter- 18.038 L.F. CHAPMAN AVENUE, OR- 4. Remove and dispose of P.C.C.driveway 49.568 S.F. ANGE, CA, RESS FINAN- 5. Remove and dispose of P.C.C.sidewalk 49,129 S.F. CIAL CORPORATION, a 6. Remove and dispose of asphalt concrete 27,007 S.F. California Corporation, as duly appointed Trustee under 7 Construct P.C.C.curb and gutter 18,038 L.F. and pursuant to the power of 8. Construct P.C.C.driveway 49.568 L.F. sale conferred in that certain 9. Construct P.C.C.sidewalk 49,129 S.F. Deed of Trust executed by ' 10. Construct asphalt concrete 729 TOI MATTHEW F. BOWMAN 11. Remove existing curb return 7,772 S.F AND LEONORA M. BOW- 12. Remove existing cross gutter 2,973 S.F MAN.HUSBAND AND WIFE 13. Construct curb return w/wheel chair ramp 11 EA Recorded on 0911611993. 14. Construct cross cutter 2,973 S.F in Book Na of Official Rec- 15. Remove existing and install new City pads of ORANGE county, at furnished water meter boxes 313 EA page N o Recorder's I . by 16. Remove existing material radio 67,657 S.F � ment Na. 93-0622437, by 9 grading f reason of a breach or default In accordance with the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code,tht i in payment or performance of State of California,Director of the Department of Industrial Relations shs the obligations secured thereby,including that breach determine the general prevailing revailin rate of wages,applicable to the work tc � pp. r or default. Notice of which done;copies o the latest general wage rate determinations are on file a r was recorded 12/15/1994 as office of the City Clerk and the office of the Public Works of the City of If Recorder's Instrument No. Huntington Beach,Califomia. It Page n1 25, in Book L T Quantities ands specifications,together with proposal form,may be obtai at i- Page nla, WILL SELL AT P $ P P Y t- PUBLIC AUCTION TO THE at the office of the Director of Public Works,City Hall,Huntington Beach e HIGHEST BIDDER FOR Califomia. ,- CASH, lawful money of the No bid will be received unless it is made on a blank form fumished by It United States, evidenced by Director of Public Works.The special attention of prospective bidders is or a Cashier's Check drawn o r called to the proposal requirements,set forth in the specifications,for fL a state or national bank, or P P q P j_ the equivalent thereof drawn directions as to the bidding. A on any other financial irstitu- The above quantities are approximate only,being given as a basis for t Y lion specified in section 5102 comparison of bids,and the City of Huntington Beach does not ex resE IN of the Califomia Financial P tY 9 P ie Code,authorized to do busi- by implications agree that the actual amount of work will correspond 3 ness in the State of Califor- therewith but reserves that right to increase or decrease the amount of y nia,ALL PAYABLE AT THE class or portion of the work,as may be deemed necessary or expedien- et TIME OF SALE,all right,title the Director Of Public Works. and interest held by it as Trustee,in that real property All bids will be compared on the basis of the Director of Public Works situated in said County and estimate of the quantities of work to be done. it LOT 38 OF TRACT 3893,State,described as follows: it Substitution of securities for any monies by the City to insure performa 5r IN THE CITY OF HUNTING- shall be permitted in accordance with provisions of the Califomia s- TON BEACH, AS PER MAP Government Code,Section 4590. s, RECORDED IN BOOK 150, each bid shall be made out on a form to be obtained at the office of thr :i- PAGES 12 AND 13, OF director of Public Works,Development Wing,2000 Main Street,Huntir a- MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,IN h Beach,California;shall be sealed and filed with the City Clerk at the C t, THE OFFICE OF HE B Ty ,s COUNTY RECORDER OF Center,Second Floor Administration Building 2000 Main Street,Hunti SAID COUNTY. Beach,California,on or before 10:00 a.m.of February 29,1996,and e EXCEPT THEREFROM be opened by the committee composed of the City Clerk,the City Atto 1 ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS and Director of Public Works or their authorized representative and thi rd AND OTt IER HYDROCAR- results of said bidding will be reported to the City Council of said City, id BON SUBSTANCES LYING Huntington Beach at their regular meeting to be held on Monday,the'! id BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 March,1996 at the hour of 7:30 p.m.in the City Council Chambers in t; FEET WITHOUT ANY Civic Center of said City of Huntington Beach and shall be acted upor d. said City Council at the regular meeting of March 4,1996. 1i The City of Huntington Beach,Califomia reserves the right to reject ar ill Repainting. to all bids and to accept the bid deemed for the best interest of the City r or II yw're baking to repaint Huntington Beach,California. o- it,tttbuld 0,replace it or By order of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,Califomia 'd n restore it,look in the February 5,1996. r Id Bassifil&to find the ATTEST: �t- service ya,;re kwk�fa. Connie Brockway,City Clerk id of the City of Huntington Beach r- 2000 Main Street-2nd Floor of Huntington Beach,California 92648 :It (714)536-5227 ty ;s Published Huntington Beach-Fountain Valley Independent February I nn iopn 0& 1/&-& 7-o 2: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 'S �INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION " HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council embers G VIA: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrato v \ l�} 1 FROM: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director DATE: April 8, 1996 2 SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION NO. 3 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 94-1 - COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN (CONTINUED FROM THE MARCH 11, 1996 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: General Plan Amendment No. 94-2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 is the comprehensive update of the city's General Plan which includes the review and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. The City Council to date, has conducted two study sessions on the update of the draft General Plan (February 26 and March 11). At the City Council study session on March 11, the Council continued the study sessions on the draft General Plan to the meeting of April 8, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Continue General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the final scheduled City Council Study Session of May 6, 1996." ANALYSIS: This is the third of four scheduled study sessions in which the staff will present the legislative draft General Plan to the City Council. These meetings will continue to be working "study sessions" and non-public hearings. This format allows staff to present preliminary background information and allow input from the City Council. The preliminary information presented will include an overview of the last City Council study session, any outstanding issues, and a review of the elements. City Council 4/8/96 1 (CD 96-20) 1 �Q The draft General Plan contains 13 elements; eleven (11) of which have been presented at the last two (2) study sessions. The final two (2) elements, Land Use and Circulation, will be presented tonight. One (1) remaining City Council study session is scheduled on May 6, 1996. Formal public hearings began on March 25, and are scheduled to end on May 13. It is anticipated that the review of the draft General Plan will require a minimum of three (3) public hearings. Additional public hearings may be scheduled as warranted. Elements of the General Plan: The City Council is scheduled to review the Land Use and Circulation Elements and the proposed land use map recommendations. The land use map recommendations have been formatted into a matrix for ease in their review (see Attachment No. 5). The matrix includes a comment section, staff's recommendations, and the Planning Commission's recommendations on the proposed land use designations. Area maps have also been attached for orientation. As part of the review tonight, staff has taken slides of the sites to help in identifying the location and on-site use of the property. Study Session - Review of Elements: At tonight's study session staff will present a review of the final two (2) elements of the draft General Plan. The elements to be reviewed are the Land Use and Circulation Elements. As part of the review, staff will identify the major issues, the discussions, and the outcome of the issues the Planning Commission faced as they reviewed the document. Land Use Element - The draft element identifies the location and distribution of land uses such as residential, commercial, or industrial and specifies the amount of building intensity. The draft Land Use Element addresses a majority of the same issues currently identified in the adopted Land Use Element. Major policy changes or issues are highlighted and identified for the Council's review. For tonight's review, the City Council should focus on the new Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs and the specific land use map recommendations. Please refer to Pages II-1 through II-71 of the Legislative Draft General Plan. Overview of Maior Issues The following is an overview of the major Land Use Element recommendations of the Draft General Plan as forwarded by the GPAC. The Planning Commission is recommending some changes to the GPAC draft General Plan which are discussed in the following overview as well. Please note, the specific land use map recommendations identified below will include a corresponding reference number which will identify the land use recommendation in the attached matrix. City Council 4/8/96 2 (CD 96-20) Development Threshold - a ceiling on the amount of growth that can occur in the City. The ceiling is based upon the ability to provide adequate infrastructure (roads, sewers, storm drains, etc.) and government services (Fire, Police, etc.) to serve future development and residents in a quality manner. If this ceiling is approached, the infrastructure and services may have to be constructed and/or adjusted to maintain the quality of life for the existing and future residents. As part of this proposed policy, implementation programs are proposed to establish a Growth Management Ordinance and a Growth Monitoring Program. The Planning Commission's recommendations on the land use map have slightly reduced and altered the thresholds. The threshold may be further modified pending the final action by the City Council. LAND USE MAP RECOMMENDATIONS: Pacific Coast Highway The concept for Pacific Coast Highway is to create distinctive, identifiable areas of activity or interest along its entire length within the city. This can be accomplished through the creation of the following subareas (refer to Figure LU- 6, Page II-64): Subarea 4B - The northwest corner of Golden West Street and Pacific Coast Highway (Shell/Cal Resources site) - Allow medium to high density residential development with neighborhood commercial in conjunction with a specific plan. Upon adoption of the proposed land use map designation, subsequent public hearings would be required in the formulation of the specific plan for the entire site. The existing designation allows a combination of Industrial Resource Production and Medium Density Residential. (Matrix No. 23, District Map Nos. 3 & 4). The Planning Commission recommends changing the designation from Industrial to Mixed Use. As part of this recommendation, staff met with the property owner's representative and the residents of the Seacliff area in an attempt to include language to address a number of the concerns raised at the Planning Commission hearings. The general issues were with overall density, distribution of land uses, deletion of the Orange Ave. extension, vehicular access points, and open space. To address the concerns, additional language was added to the Subarea 4B category in Table LU-4, Page 11-53 of the Land Use Element. Staff concurs with the modifications as approved by the Planning Commission. City Council 4/8/96 3 (CD 96-20) Subarea 4E - The northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway (Action Boats site/White Hole area) - Allow mixed development in conjunction with a specific plan. Development would be allowed only in areas not officially designated as wetlands and only if wetlands are protected and maintained. The existing designation allows a mix of Visitor Serving Commercial and Open Space Conservation. (Matrix No. 90, District Map No. 14) The Planning Commission recommends the area not be changed to a mixed use designation and that it retain it's existing land use designations of Open-Space Conservation, Visitor-Serving Commercial and Residential Medium Density. The Planning Commission's recommendation was based upon the Coastal Commission's recent recommendation on the overall White Hole area. Staff concurs with the recommendation. Subarea 4H - The area north of Pacific Coast Highway between the Edison Plant and Brookhurst Street (White Hole area) - Allow low density residential development in conjunction with a specific plan. Development would be allowed only in areas not officially designated as wetlands and only if wetlands are protected and maintained. The existing designation is Open Space Conservation. (Matrix No. 53, District Map Nos. 22 & 24) The Planning Commission recommends the area not be changed to a residential designation and that it retain it's existing land use designation of Open-Space Conservation. The Planning Commission's recommendation was based upon the Coastal Commission's recent recommendation on the overall White Hole area. Staff concurs with the recommendation. Portion of Subarea 9F - The area west of Newland Street and north of the flood control channel (White Hole area) - Allow for industrial development. Development would be allowed only in areas not officially designated as wetlands and only if wetlands are protected and maintained. The existing designation is Open Space Conservation. (Matrix No. 93, District Map No. 14) The Planning Commission recommends the area not be changed to an Industrial designation and that it retain it's existing land use designation of Planning Reserve. The Planning Commission's recommendation was based upon the Coastal Commission's recent recommendation on the overall White Hole area. Staff concurs with the recommendation. Beach Boulevard The original GPAC concept for Beach Boulevard was to encourage nodes of dense commercial development at major intersections and allow some high density residential development to occur in selected nodes along Beach Boulevard. The concept was to break up the continuous strip commercial City Council 4/8/96 4 (CD 96-20) development and help create distinctive, identifiable commercial nodes. This can be accomplished through the creation of the following subareas (refer to Figure LU-6): Subarea 66 - The area north of Warner Avenue to Edinger Ave. (both sides of Beach Blvd.) - Allow mixed use development (commercial/residential), encouraging (not requiring) automobile dealers to locate in this area. Commercial lot depth is increased in some areas to provide adequate commercial sites. The existing designation is a mix of General Commercial and Medium High Density Residential. (Matrix Nos. 35 & 36, District Map Nos. 26 & 27) The Planning Commission's recommendation is to designate the area Mixed Use Vertical with a reduction of density from 25 to 15 dwelling units per acre. Staff concurs with the recommendation to allow mixed use development but disagrees with the reduction of density. Staff recommends the City Council retain the 25 du/ac. The 15 du/ac is not economically feasible to provide a mixed use project based upon the consultant's analysis and recommendation. Subarea 6H - The areas south of Warner Avenue, north of Yorktown Avenue and north of Adams Ave. (both sides of Beach Blvd.) - Allow high density residential development as in-fill, creating nodes of residential, breaking up the commercial strip development. The existing designation is General Commercial. (Matrix No. 87 & 88, District Map Nos. 1, 2, 30, 31, 39, & 40) The Planning Commission's recommendation is to retain the existing designation of Commercial General. Staff concurs with the recommendation. Portion of Subarea 6G - The Crest View School site located on Talbert Avenue and Beach Boulevard - Allow general commercial development on the western half of the site and low density residential development on the eastern half. The existing designation on the entire site is Low Density Residential. (Matrix No. 95, District Map No. 40) The Planning Commission recommends the site be removed from consideration in the General Plan update process. Staff concurs with the recommendation but requests that the Public (P) designation be placed on the site to identify the school. Edinger Avenue The concept for Edinger Avenue is to create a district of regional commercial activity. This can be accomplished through design principles and the creation of the following subareas (refer to Figure LU-6, Page II-64): City Council 4/8/96 5 (CD 96-20) Subarea 5C - The area south of Edinger Avenue between Golden West Street and Beach Boulevard - Allow and promote regional commercial development such as "big box" retailers (Wal Mart, Home Depot, etc.). The existing designation is General Commercial. (Matrix Nos. 30, 31, 32, & 83, District Map No. 26) The Planning Commission concurs with the GPAC and recommends the area be changed to a Commercial Regional designation to provide expanded commercial opportunities. Staff concurs with the recommendation. Subarea 6G - The area north of Edinger Avenue and east of Golden West Street - Allow commercial development on the frontage of Golden West College expanding the Edinger commercial corridor. The existing designation is Public, Quasi-Public/Institutional. (Matrix No. 29, District Map No. 15) The Planning Commission concurs with the GPAC and recommends the area be changed to a Commercial General designation to provide expanded commercial opportunities. Staff concurs with the recommendation. Subarea 5F - The area east of Gothard Street and north of Center Drive - Allow mixed development (commercial/residential) in conjunction with the existing transit center. The existing designation is a combination of Mixed Development and Public, Quasi-Public/Institutional. (Matrix No. 33, District Map No. 15) The Planning Commission concurs with the GPAC and recommends the area be changed to a Mixed Development designation to promote an activity center of commercial and residential near the bus transit center. Staff concurs with the recommendation. Subarea 5A - The area north of Edinger Avenue and west of Beach Boulevard - Allow mixed development (commercial/residential), including the promotion and retention of regional commercial development at the Huntington Center. The existing designation is General Commercial. (Matrix No. 34, District Map 15) The Planning Commission recommends the Huntington Center be designated Commercial Regional without the allowance for mixed development. Staff recommends the mixed development and regional commercial designation remain. This will allow for more creative opportunities as part of future redevelopment of the Huntington Center * Circulation Element - The draft element identifies the current and future transportation needs for the city and sets policies that ensure a safe and efficient transportation system. The draft Circulation Element addresses a majority of the same issues currently identified in the adopted Circulation Element. Major policies or issues are identified and highlighted for the City Council 4/8/96 6 (CD 96-20) Council's review. For tonight's review, the City Council should focus on the new Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Programs and the specific roadway segments and capacity levels. Please refer to Pages III-1 through III-30 of the Legislative Draft General Plan. Overview of Maior Issues The following is an overview of the major Circulation Element recommendations of the Draft General Plan as forwarded by the GPAC. The Planning Commission is recommending some changes to the GPAC draft General Plan which are discussed in the following overview as well. Development Threshold - because the Land Use and Circulation Elements are required by law to be correlated, the development threshold issue effects both elements. The threshold is a ceiling on the amount of growth that can occur in the City. The ceiling is based upon the ability to provide adequate infrastructure (roads, sewers, storm drains, etc.) and government services (Fire, Police, etc.) to serve future development and residents in a quality manner. If this ceiling is approached, the infrastructure and services may have to be constructed and/or adjusted to maintain the quality of life for the existing and future residents. As part of this proposed policy, implementation programs are proposed to establish a Growth Management Ordinance and a Growth Monitoring Program. Land Use Recommendations - because of the required correlation between the Land Use and Circulation Elements, the proposed land use recommendations have been assigned a development threshold. The proposed recommendations will require modifications to existing and proposed roadway segments to comply with established levels of service. In addition, the circulation system, land use recommendations and development threshold, have been proposed to be in compliance with regional congestion management plans. Modifications to the proposed land use recommendations may impact the existing and proposed circulation system. ROADWAY CAPACITY RECOMMENDATIONS: Roadway Segments - The following roadway segments require a change in their classification. The proposed roadway segments are based on the potential need and are a result of the implementation of the proposed land use recommendations. The modifications are identified below and on Table CE-1 (Page III-12) of the Legislative Draft General Plan. ROADWAY SEGMENT EXISTING PROPOSED 1. Adams Ave.: Brookhurst St. to City limits 6 lane major 8 major* 2. Banning Ave.: Bushard St. to Brookhurst St. 4 lane secondary 2 lane collector City Council 4/8/96 7 (CD 96-20) i ROADWAY SEGMENT EXISTING PROPOSED 3. Beach Blvd.: Ellis Ave. to Yorktown 6 lane major 8 lane major 4. Bolsa Chica St.: Edinger Ave. to Rancho Ave. 6 lane major 8 lane major I 5. Brookhurst St.: Indianapolis Ave. to Garfield Ave. 6 lane major 8 lane major 6. Garfield Ave.: Delaware St. to Magnolia Ave. 4 lane primary 6 lane primary 7. Gothard St.: Warner Ave. to Heil Ave. 4 lane secondary 4 lane primary 8. Gothard St.: Heil Ave. to McFadden Ave. 4 lane secondary 6 lane major 9. Heil Ave.: Graham St. to Springdale St. 4 lane secondary 4 lane primary 10. Main St.: Delaware St.: to Beach Blvd. 4 lane secondary 6 lane major 11. McFadden Ave.: Edwards St. to Golden West St. 4 lane secondary 4 lane primary 12. Orange Ave.: Golden West St. to Sixth St. 4 lane secondary 2 lane collector 13. PCH: Warner Ave. to Golden West St. 4 lane primary 6 lane major 14. PCH: N/O Beach Blvd. to S/O Brookhurst St. 6 lane major 8 lane major" 15. Palm Ave.: Golden West St. to Sixth St. 4 lane secondary 2 lane collector 16. Springdale St.: McFadden Ave. to City limits 4 lane primary 6 lane major 17. Warner Ave.: PCH to Algonquin St. 6 lane major 8 lane major 18. Warner Ave.: Gothard St. to Magnolia Ave. 6 lane major 8 lane major *Requires an estimated amount of right of way acquisition (2' X 1,800') **The change will not improve the street's level of service to LOS C or better The Planning Commission did not make a formal recommendation to the City Council on the roadway capacities. This was done because of the potential changes to the land use map recommendations by the City Council. As land use designations change, the roadway capacities are possibly altered. Because a number of traffic model runs have already been prepared for a number of different scenarios and because funding for additional model runs is limited, the Planning Commission forwarded this aspect of the Circulation Element without a recommendation. Levels of Service - is the tool used to describe the operating characteristics of the street system in terms of the level of congestion or delay experienced by traffic. Service levels range from A through F with each level defined by a range of volume to capacity (V/C) ratios. Level of Service A, B, and C are considered good operating conditions with only minor delays being experienced by City Council 4/8/96 8 (CD 96-20) motorists. Level of Service D represents below average or fair operating conditions where drivers occasionally have to wait through more than one signal cycle to proceed through the intersection. Level of Service E is considered "at capacity" conditions and level of service F represents jammed conditions. The city's current policy for acceptable level of service is D at traffic signal controlled intersections and level of service C for roadway segment links. The city's level of service policy is a necessary standard to maintain and obtain future funding from the County and State for future street improvements within the city. Please refer to Figure CE-2 (Page III-5) and Figure CE- 5 (Page III-11) of the draft Circulation Element for the existing and future intersections and roadway segments levels of service. The Planning Commission's recommendation included mitigation measures that would reduce the level of service from D/F from 12 intersections and roadway segments to only four(4) level of service D intersections and roadway segments. Bridges over the Santa Ana River/Cross Gap Connector - the future baseline network of the Circulation Element assumes the Bolsa Street extension (Cross Gap connector) is constructed as a modified two lane collector and the proposed Garfield Ave. and Banning Ave. bridges are both not constructed. The Planning Commission recommended that the 2010 Circulation Plan of Arterial Highways for the City of Huntington Beach include certain aspects of the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. The aspects are the proposed Santa Ana Bridge crossings and the Cross Gap Connector. This recommendation was proposed only after lengthy discussions and a presentation from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). The Planning Commission did not want to jeopardize the city's eligibility for Measure M funds and Congestion Management Plan (Proposition 111) funds. The recommendation is to show the roadway improvements only on the plan for compliance, not with the intent to ever construct them. Additional wording was added to the element by the Planning Commission to clearly indicate the city's intent. Please refer to the explanation of intent on Page 111-7. The Circulation Element, as noted above, assumes no bridges and a modified two lane cross gap connector. The Department of Public Works Traffic Division has prepared an analysis of the Circulation Element and the modifications made by the Planning Commission. Please refer to Attachment No. 9. Representatives from the Traffic Division will be present to provide a presentation on the materials submitted and an overview of the traffic and circulation issues. City Council 4/8/96 9 (CD 96-20) i * Outstanding Issues - staff will continue to monitor issues that the Council requests additional information on and provide responses to those at the next study session. Staff has modified sections of the Land Use and Circulation Elements which are presented for City Council consideration. Please see Attachment No. 10. The proposed language change to the Land Use Element is merely the inclusion of the procedural requirements to amend the General Plan. This is a transfer of language from the existing General Plan. The second set of language changes is to the Circulation Element. These minor changes are to provide consistency with the roadway classifications adopted by the County of Orange. Also, the Proposed Classification has been changed to Potential Need on Table CE-1 (Page III-12). This category change is proposed to indicate that a roadway classification may be adjusted if the future development under the General Plan dictates the need. At the March 25, 1996 City Council meeting, a number of issues were pulled for further consideration. Staff has analyzed the areas of discussion and has proposed new or modified language (see Attachment No. 11). The modifications are based upon the comments and discussion presented at the public hearing. Please review the modified language and provide input at the study session. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The draft General Plan has been analyzed in Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 94-1. The EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the buildout of the General Plan. The EIR was made available for public review and comment for 45 days from July 23, 1995 to September 5, 1995. All public comments have been responded to by staff and have been attached to the EIR. The City Council needs to determine whether the EIR considers all environmental effects of the proposed update of the General Plan, is complete and adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The EIR is an informational document prepared to educate decision makers and the general public about the potential environmental impacts of the draft General Plan and to aid in the decision- making process. COASTAL STATUS: Upon final adoption by the City Council, the General Plan will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the CCC. The certification by the CCC may occur approximately six to nine months from final City Council adoption. City Council 4/8/96 10 (CD 96-20) OTHER DEPARTMENTS CONCERNS: The draft General Plan has been reviewed by all city departments. City staff will present recommendations to the City Council on the Planning Commission's approved legislative draft General Plan. The city staff recommendations will be presented at the formal public hearings. In addition, any written comments received will be presented to the City Council for their review and consideration. SUMMARY: City staff will continue to present an overview of the draft General Plan over the next two (2) study session meetings. The formal public hearings have begun and are scheduled to end in May. We have attached the calendar of hearings for your review (see Attachment No. 1). Each study session presentation will include a slide show which will give an overview of the nights agenda and the topics to be covered. Each presentation will include a review of the elements, a review of the goals, policies and programs for each element, a review of the modifications recommended by the Planning Commission and any outstanding issues from the previous study sessions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Legislative Draft dated December 12, 1995, City of Huntington Beach General Plan (not attached) 2. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 (not attached) 3. General Plan Update Reference Guide dated May 23, 1995 (not attached) 4. Chart - Location of Related General Plan Topics (existing vs proposed) 5. Matrix of Proposed General Plan Land Use Map changes approved by the Planning Commission (approved December 12, 1995) 6. Appendix of Comments 7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1509 with Attachment "A" 8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1510 9. Circulation Element analysis prepared by Public Works 10. Proposed language changes to the Land Use & Circulation Elements 11. Outstanding Issues - March 25, 1996 City Council hearing MTU:MSF:HZ:hf City Council 4/8/96 11 (CD 96-20) j ATTACHMENT 1 �J] GENERAL PLAN LEGISLATIVE DRAFT DATED 12/12/95 (NOT ATTACHED) COPIES AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ATTACHMENT 2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR NO. 94-1 DATED 7/5/95 ( NOT ATTACHED) COPIES AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ATTACHMENT 3 i GENERAL PLAN REFERENCE GUIDE (REFERENCE MATERIAL ONLY) DATED 5/23/95 (NOT ATTACHED) COPIES AVAILABLE IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Q ,af Y4 •3 ATTACHMENT 4 i Location of Related Information in the Existing and Proposed General Plans The following chart illustrates the location of related information in the existing and proposed General Plans. The left hand column contains the proposed General Plan Elements and the right hand column contains the related topics of the existing General Plan. Proposed General Plan Elements Existing General Plan Elements Safety Public Facilities and Public Services Community Facilities Seismic Safety Utilities Community Facilities Hazardous Materials Safety Safety Environmental Resources\Conservation r Open Space and Conservation Noise Noise r Land Use Air Quality Open Space Conservation r Seismic Safety Environmental Hazards Safety �- Open Space and Conservation Recreation and Community Services Recreation Economic Development Land Use Urban Design Land Use r Land Use Historic and Cultural Resources Open Space and Conservation Circulation Circulation Land Use Land Use g:j am es:genpl an xhart ATTACHMENT 5 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DRAFT GENERAL PLAN PROPOSED CHANGES IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS As Approved by the Planning Commission December 12, 1995 �.....,� 4.s General Plan Land Use Recommendations - City Council Review Planning Commission approved December 12, 1995 Staff Analysis & Recommendations - 418196 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 1 Southwest RL CN - F1 CG- FP2 Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Banning Ave. & Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential Bushard St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing General Plan to Commercial FAR) zoning and existing Neighborhood (CN-Fl) (DM 22) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5-0) 2. South side of RH P (RH -30) RH Add Public (P) Disagree with PC, do not Disagree with Staff& Hamilton Ave. (Residential Public- (Residential designation to decrease density from 30 to GPAC: recommend 300' west of High underlying High Density) identify 7 du/ac, agree with GPAC: change from Residential Brookhurst St. Density) Residential church/school no change to existing High to Residential Low High Density Residential High Density with Public (P) (DM 20) 30 un/ac (RH) designation. designation; decrease in density from 30 to 7 du/ac, P (RL-7) NOTE: inconsistent with zoning (Straw Vote 5-0) 3. Northwest RL CN- Fl CG Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& g g g corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Atlanta Ave. & Low Density Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential Newland St. Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial FAR) zoning and existing Neighborhood (CN-F1) (DM 13) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5-0) PC approved 12/12/95 (g\cc1ndus1) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL. ADVISORY EXISTING PI..ANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 4. Atlanta Ave. east RL P(RL -6.5) RL Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Leasure Ln. (Residential Public - (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Low underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density Public(P) designation; (DM 14) Density) Low Density church/school (RL) designation, retain retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Residential, maximum 7.0 un/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) 6.5 un/ac 5. Northwest Recreation P(Public) RA - RL Public designation Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of (Residential for a Utility right new designation for utility recommend Public (P) Magnolia St. & Agriculture, of way right of way designation to identify Hamilton Ave. Residential utility right of way (Straw Low Density) Vote 5-0) DM 14 6. Southwest RL CN - F1 CG - FP2 Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change to Indianapolis Ave Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and Commercial Neighborhood & Newland St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing General Plan (CN-F1) designation FAR) zoning and existing (Straw Vote 6-1) (DM 13) conditions RL GN F1 CG CC. FP2 Change ff6m Agree with GPAC; Deleted; change to General of Bushtird St. & (Residential (Commercial (Cet> mer iRl Residential to provides eonsisteney Plan designation has been Garfield A LOW ♦ Neiighborrhoed, yG,e�neral, Eemmercial-te between previously approved Density-) Density 0.35 FleedpIafn) •�•,na ciici existing General Plan ning eondite 8. Northwest RL CN - F1 Q - CG- FP2 Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Qualified, Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Bushard St. & Low Neighborhood, Commercial Commercial to between Zoning and Residential to Commercial Litchfield Dr. Density) Density 0.35 General, reflect existing General Plan Neighborhood (CN-F1) FAR) Floodplain) zoning and existing designation (Straw Vote 5- (DM 6) conditions 0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 2 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 9. Southwest RM OS- P (Open OS - PR- FP2 Change Residential Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of (Residential Space Park) (Open Space, to Open Space Park provides consistency recommend change from Delaware St. & Medium Parks and to reflect existing between Zoning and Residential to Open Space- Detroit Ave. Density) Recreation, park General Plan Park(OS-P) designation Floodplain) (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 12) W. nne*fie Co R14 "'r"�. V F8 SP DTn Cz SPA Change from Agree with GPAC-; Deleted; change to General Highway (Residential (M ,ec}Ilse (Dewntewe residential-to Med6fied to eenferm to Plan designation has been frontage High Vfien! Speer Plan; eommer-61i. amendments made to previously approved between Density) Density 5 ncn,str:e ;<- 6th St. >h St. FAR D rzv j— Visitor-Serving (approved April eIf ere td7 (DM ) 25 du/ne, ��� Speeifie Plan) 11. Southwest RM CN -F1 - D CG Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC:. corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Alabama St. & Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and Residential to Commercial Adams Ave. Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan Neighborhood(CN-F1-D) FAR, Design zoning and existing' designation(Straw Vote 5- (DM 12) Overlay) conditions 0) 12. Northeast corner RM OS- P (Open RM - 0 Change Residential Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Huntington (Residential Space- Park) (Residential to Open Space Park change to reflect existing recommend change from St. & Wichita Medium Medium to reflect existing conditions (will require Residential to Open Space- Ave. Density) Density, Oil park(Boys and future zone change) Park(OS-P)designation Overlay) Girls Club) (Straw Vote 5-0) NOTE: (DM 2) inconsistent with zoning Approved as of December 12, 1995 3 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 13. Southwest RM P (RM - 15) RM Add Public(P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of Clay (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC: no change to recommend change to add Ave. & Delaware Medium underlying Medium identify, existing Residential Public (P) designation St. Density) Residential Density) church/school Medium Density(RM) (Straw Vote 5-0) Medium designation (DM 2) Density 15 un/ac 14. Northeast corner RM P (RM - 15) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Clay Ave. & (Residential Public - (Residential designation to GPAC: no change to recommend change to add Delaware St. Medium underlying Medium identify existing Medium Density Public (P) designation Density) Residential Density) church/school Residential (RM) (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 2) Medium designation Density 15 un/ac 15. South side of IG (Industrial P (I) Public- IL (Industrial Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: Garfield Ave., General) underlying Limited) designation to GPAC: no change to recommend change to add Gothard St. & Industrial identify City's existing Industrial(I) Public(P) designation Huntington St. Water Yard designation (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 2) 16. Southwest Mixed MH - F3-30- Pacifica Modify existing Agree with PC: disagree Agree with Staff: corner of Main Development SP(Mixed Community. Mixed Use with GPAC; change to recommend change to Mixed St. & Florida St. Use Plan designation to Mixed Use designation Use and add Specific Plan (East of Florida) Horizontal, reflect existing use and add Specific Plan (SP) designation (Straw Density 1.0 and conditions Vote 6-0-1 abstain) (DM 39) FAR, 30 un/ac, Specific Plan) Approved as of December 12, 1995 4 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS 11 DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 17. Southwest RM P (RMH- 25) RMH Add Public (P) Agree with PC & Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of Ellis (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC: increase in recommend to add Public Ave. & Chapel Medium underlying Medium High identify density from 15 to 25 (P) designation, increase Ln. Density) Residential Density) church/school, du/ac, provides density from 15 to 25 du/ac Medium High increase density consistency between (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 40) Density 25 from 15 to 25 du/ac Zoning and General Plan un/ac 18. Park site; RM OS Park'' OS- PR(Open Change Residential Agree with PC &GPAC: Agree with Staff&'GPAC: northeast of (Residential (Open Space, Space, Parks to Open Space Park provides consistency recommend change from Pacific Coast Medium Park) and to reflect existing between Zoning and Residential to Open Space- Highway & Density) Recreation) park General Plan Park(OS-P) designation Warner Ave. (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 35) 19. Northeast of RL RM - 15 RMP Land use change to Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Heil Ave. & (Residential (Residential (Residential reflect existing with GPAC: recommend recommend retain existing Saybrook Ln. Low Density) Medium Manufactured density of Mobile Mobile Home overlay Residential Low Density 7.0 Density 15 Home Park) Home Park, and retain existing du/ac and add Mobile (DM 23) un/ac) increase density Residential Low Density Home Overlay (Straw Vote from 7 to 15 du/ac designation 5-0) 20. 300' Northwest RL P (RL- 6.5) RL Add Public(P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Heil Ave. & (Residential Public- (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Springdale St. Low Density) underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density Public(P) designation; Residential church/school (RL) designation, retain retain maximum 7.0 du/ac (DM 24) Low Density maximum 7.0 un/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) 6.5 un/ac)' Approved as of December 12, 1995 5 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING GF,NERAL PLAN 11 GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 21. 300' Southwest SR(Senior RMH - 25 (Q) RMH Eliminates Senior Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Edinger Ave. Residential) (Residential (Qualified, Residential provides consistency recommend change from & Springdale St. Medium High Residential Designation, RMH between Zoning and Senior Residential to Density 25 Medium High allows senior General Plan Residential Medium High (DM 24) un/ac) Density) residential (RMH-25) designation development (Straw Vote 5-0) 22. Northeast corner CG P(CN- F1) CG Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of McFadden (Commercial Public- (Commercial designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Ave. & Edwards General) underlying General) identify Commercial designation Public(P) designation. St. Commercial church/school (Straw Vote 5-0) Neighborhoo (DM 17) d, Density 0.35 FAR) 23. Shell/Cal Industrial- MH - F1 -30 M2 - 01 - CZ; Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: Resources site, Resource - SP (Mixed R4- O - CZ; Industrial to Mixed expands the visitor recommend change from inland side of Production Use C1 - O CZ Use serving commercial Industrial-Resource Pacific Coast Horizontal, (Industrial opportunities along the Production to Mixed-Use Highway Density 0.35 General, Oil coast, allows residential Horizontal; recommend F2- between FAR,30 Overlay, development, 30(.5 FAR,30 du/ac); Seapoint Ave. & un/ac, Coastal Zone; incorporates property recommend "average" Golden West St. Specific Plan) Residential owner& residents density of 15 du/ac (Straw High Density, comments (will require Vote 7-0) (DM 3, 4 & 10) Oil Overlay, future zone change and Coastal Zone; Master/Specific Plan) Commercial Neighborhood, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone) Approved as of December 12, 1995 6 (g\cclndus1) ' EXISTING GENERAL PLAeY GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 24. 1,500' Southwest IG (Industrial RM- 15 1G(Industrial Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff of Warner Ave. General) (Residential General) Industrial to with GPAC: change to recommend change from & Gothard St. Medium Residential to Residential Low Density Industrial to Residential (Mobile Home Density, 15 reflect existing and add Mobile Home Low Density 7.0 du/ac, add Park) un/ac) conditions (Mobile Overlay (will require Mobile Home Overlay. Home Park) future zone change) NOTE: inconsistent with (DM 31) Zoning (Straw Vote 4-1) 25. Southeast corner IG (Industrial I - F2- H IL (Industrial Add Historic (H) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Gothard St. & General) (Industrial, Limited) Overlay to area to no change to Industrial recommend to add Historic Warner Ave. Density 0.5 identify Historic (I) designation Overlay (Straw Vote 5-0) FAR, structures (Slater (DM 31) Historical House, etc.) Overlay) 26. 50' Northwest of RL P (RL -6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff&GPAC: Edinger Ave. & (Residential Public - Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Golden West St. Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density Public (P) designation; Residential church/school (RL) designation, retain retain maximum 7.0 du/ac (DM 17) Low Density maximum 7.0 un/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) 6.5 un/ac 27. 500' Northwest RL P(RL -6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Edinger Ave. (Residential Public - Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend change to add & Golden West Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density Public (P) designation; St. Residential church/school (RL) designation, retain retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Low Density maximum 7.0 un/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) DM 17) 6.5 un/ac Approved as of December 12, 1995 7 (g\cclndus1) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 28. Northwest RM CN - F1 CG Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change from McFadden Ave. Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and Residential Medium Density & Golden West Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial St. FAR) zoning and Neighborhood(CN-F1) (DM 17) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5- 0 29. P, Q- P, I P(CG - F1) PS (Public Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff & GPAC: Northeast corner (Public, Public - Semi Public) Public, Quasi- expands commercial recommend change from of Golden West Quasi- underlying Public, opportunities along Public, Quasi-Public, St. & Edinger Public, Commercial Institutional to Edinger Corridor by Institutional to Commercial Ave. (Edinger Institutional) General, Public with changing the designation General (CG-F1) and add frontage) Density 0.35 underlying to Commercial General Public (P) designation FAR) Commercial with Public (P) (Straw Vote 5-0) NOTE: (DM 1.5) General designation to identify inconsistent with zoning designation at college. Golden West College 30. Southeast of CG CR- F2 - D CG Upgrades existing Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff'& GPAC: Golden West St. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands regional recommend change from & Edinger Ave. General) Regional, General) designation to commercial opportunities Commercial General to Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access Commercial Regional (CR- (DM 26) FAR, Design Commercial F2-D) designation (Straw Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) 31. South side of CG CR- F2 D CG Upgrades existing Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: Edinger Ave. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands regional recommend change from from Gothard General) Regional, General) designation to commercial opportunities Commercial General to St. to Parkside Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access Commercial Regional (CR- Ln. FAR, Design Commercial F2-D) designation (Straw (DM 26) Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 8 (g\cclndus 1) 11 EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL, ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 32. Northeast of CG CR- F2 - D CG (Commercial Upgrades existing Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: Gothard St. & (Commercial (Commercial General) Commercial expands regional recommend change from Edinger Ave General) Regional, designation to commercial opportunities Commercial General to Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access Commercial Regional (CR- (DM 15). FAR, Design Commercial F2-D) designation (Straw Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) 33. Southeast of P, Q- P,P MV- F8- D RL (Residential Change from Agree with PC& GPAC: Agree with Staff&GPAC: McFadden Ave. (Public, (Mixed Use Low Density), Public, Quasi- promotes an activity recommend change from & Gothard St. Quasi - Vertical, IG(General Public, center by adding Public, Quasi-Public, Public, Density 1.5 Industrial), CG- Institutional and commercial/residential Institutional and Mixed (DM 15) Institutional) FAR [MU], H (Commercial Mixed Use to (mixed use) designation Development to Mixed Use MD (Mixed 0.35 FAR [C], General-High Mixed Use near a transit center Vertical (MV-F8-D) Development 25 un/ac) Rise Overlay) Vertical designation (Straw Vote 7- (Commercial/Resid 0) ential) at the Transit Center Area 34. Huntington CG MV- F9 - SP CG (Commercial Modifies Disagree with PC,agree Disagree with Staff& Center (Commercial (Mixed Use General) Commercial with GPAC: recommend GPAC: eliminate mixed General) Vertical, designation by mixed use to expand and use, recommend change (DM 15) Density 1.5 adding Mixed Use revitalize opportunities from Commercial General FAR [MU], (Commercial/Resid for the Mall, promote the to Commercial Regional- 0.5 FAR [C], ential); Continues regional importance of FAR .5- Specific Plan (CR 25 un/ac) Regional the site but may(not - F2 - SP)) designation Commercial uses, required) allow (Straw Vote 5-1) may permit residential development residential in the area development Approved as of December 12, 1995 9 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS 11 DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 35. Aldrich Ave. CG MV-F10- D CG- RMH - Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& south to Heil (Commercial -A(Mixed RM Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change Ave. west side of General) Use Vertical, (Commercial designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General Beach Blvd. RMH Density 1.5 General; adding Mixed Use du/ac, agree with GPAC: to Mixed Use Vertical, (Residential FAR [MU], Residential (Commercial/Resid allows continued decrease density from 25 to (DM 26) Medium 1.5 FAR [C], Medium High ential); continues Commercial uses and 15 du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0) High 25 du/ac, Density; commercial uses, development,permits NOTE: inconsistent with Density) RM Design Residential may permit (not required) residential zoning (Residential Overlay, Medium residential uses and provides Medium Auto Density) development, does possible relocation of Density) Overlay) increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac, Auto' Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers 36. Heil Ave. south CG MV- F10- D CG - RM Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& to Warner Ave. (Commercial - A (Mixed (Commercial Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change east & west sides General) Use Vertical, General; designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General of Beach Blvd. RM Density 1.5 Residential adding Mixed Use du/ac, agree with GPAC: to Mixed Use Vertical, (Residential FAR [MU], Medium (Commercial/Resid allows continued decrease density from 25 to (DM 26&27) Medium 1.5 FAR [C], Density) ential); continues Commercial uses and 15 du/ac (Straw Vote 5-1) Density) 25 du/ac, commercial uses, development, permits NOTE: inconsistent with Design may permit (not required) residential zoning Overlay, residential uses and provides Auto development, does possible relocation of Overlay) increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers Approved as of December 12, 1995 10 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 37. Southeast of CG MV- F10- D RM Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& Beach Blvd. & (Commercial (Mixed Use (Residential Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change Warner Ave. General) Vertical, Medium designation by density from 25 to 1'5 from Commercial General RM Density 1.5 Density) adding Mixed Use du/ac, agree with GPAC: to Mixed Use Vertical, (DM 30) (Residential FAR [MU], (Commercial/Reside allows continued decrease density from 25 to Medium 1.5 FAR [C], ntial); continues. Commercial uses and 15 du/ac (Straw Vote 5-1) Density) 25 du/ac, commercial uses, development, permits NOTE: inconsistent with Design may permit (not required) residential' zoning Overlay) residential uses and provides development,does possible relocation of increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers 38. Northeast of RH P (RMH- 25) RMH Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: Nichols St. & (Residential Public- (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change from Warner Ave. High underlying Medium High identify Multi-Family Residential Residential High to Density) Residential Density) church/school; does designation, but does Residential Medium High (DM 26) Medium High reduce density from reduce the density from Density and add Public (P) Density, 25 35 to 25 du/ac 35 to 25 du/ac designation, does decrease un/ac) density from 35 to 25 du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0) 39. 200' Northwest Mixed Use RMH- 25 Q- RMH Change from Mixed Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Magnolia Ave. (Residential (Qualified, Use to Residential provides consistency recommend change from & Warner Ave. Medium High Residential Medium High between Zoning and Mixed Use to Residential Density, 25 Medium High Density to reflect General Plan Medium High Density 25 (DM 27) un/ac) Density) existing zoning and du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0) conditions Approved as of December 12 1995 (g\ccln usl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY 11 EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 40. Southeast corner Commercial. RM- 15 OP (Office Change from Disagree with PC,agree Disagree with Staff& of Warner Ave. General (Residential Professional) Commercial General with GPAC: change to GPAC: recommend no and Oak Ln. Medium to Residential residential is compatible change to Commercial Density) Medium Density with adjacent designations General- FAR.35 (CG- (DM 31) Fl)designation (Straw Vote 6-0) 41. East & west CG RH-30 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Disagree with Staff& sides of Beach (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: eliminate GPAC: eliminate Blvd., Blaylock General) High Density, General) to Residential High forming residential nodes, residential node and Dr. south to 30 un/ac) Density to form no change to commercial recommend no change to Ronald Dr. residential node, designation Commercial General - breaks continuous FAR.35 (CG - F1) (DM 30&31) strip commercial designation (Straw Vote 5- development 0-1 absent) 42. Southeast of RM P(Public)- CG Add Public (P) Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: Beach Blvd. & (Residential designation to (Commercial designation to identifies existing hospital recommend change from Newman Ave. Medium reflect General) identify hospital; use Residential Medium Density) hospital removes Residential Density to Public (P) (DM 30) Medium Density (15 designation (Straw Vote 6 du/ac)designation 0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 12 (g\cclndus 1) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 43. East side of RM RMH- 25 RM - RMH Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Florida St., 17th (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing St.to Yorktown Medium Medium High Medium to Residential create residential node Residential Medium Ave. Density) Density, 25 Density; Medium High and increase density from Density 15 du/ac un/ac) Residential Density to reflect 15 to 25 du/ac, retain designation (Straw Vote 6- (DM 2) Medium High existing conditions existing Residential 0) NOTE: portion of site Density) and create node, Medium Density (RMH) inconsistent with does increase density zoning from 15 to 25 du/ac in some areas 44. 800' South of. RM RH- 30 RM - RMH Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Garfield Ave. on (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing east side of Medium High Density, Medium to Residential High create node and increase Residential Medium Florida St. to Density) 30 un/ac) Density; Density to reflect density from 15 to 30 Density 15 du/ac Yorktown Ave. Residential existing conditions du/ac, retain existing designation (Straw Vote 6- Medium High and create node, Residential Medium 0) NOTE: portion of site (DM 2) Density) does increase density Density (RMH) inconsistent with from 15 to 30 du/ac zoning in some areas 45. 300' Southwest RM CG - F1 RM Change from Agree with PC & GPAC: Agree with Staff& GPAC: of Yorktown (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium reflects existing recommend change from Ave. & Beach Medium General, Medium to Commercial conditions and uses Residential Medium Blvd. Density) Density 0.35 Density) General to reflect Density to Commercial FAR) existing conditions General (CG-Fl) (DM 2) designation (Straw Vote 6- 0) NOTE: inconsistent with zoning Approved as of December 12, 1995 13 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 46. East of Florida RM RH - 30 RM Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: St.,300' south of (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC: do not recommend retain existing Yorktown Ave. Medium High Density, Medium to Residential High create node and increase Residential Medium Density to Adams Ave. Density) 30 uu/ac) Density) Density to reflect density from 15 to 30 15 du/ac designation (Straw existing conditions du/ac, retain existing Vote 6-0) (DM 2) and create node, Residential Medium does increase Density density from 15 to 30 du/ac in some areas 47. 100' Northeast RM P(RH- 30) RM Add Public(P) Agree with PC,modify Agree with Staff: of Utica Ave. & (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC recommendation: recommend retain existing Florida St. Medium underlying Medium identify add Public (P) Residential Medium Density Density) Residential Density) Church/School; designation to identify 15 du/ac and add Public (P) (DM 2) High.Density, does increase school or church, but do designation (Straw Vote 6- 30 uu/ac) density from 15 to not increase density from 0) 30 du/ac 15 to 30 du/ac, retain existing Residential Medium Density (15 du/ac) 48. East of Florida RM P (RH-30) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC, modify Agree with Staff: St. 300' south of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC recommendation: recommend retain existing Utica Ave. Medium underlying Medium identify add Public (P) Residential Medium Density Density) Residential Density) Church/School; designation to identify 15 du/ac and add Public (P) (DM 2) High Density, does increase school or church, but do designation (Straw Vote 6- 30 uu/ac) density from 15 to not increase density from 0) 30 du/ac 15 to 30 du/ac, retain existing Residential Medium Density (15 du/ac) Approved as of December 12, 1995 14 (g\cclndus 1) 11 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 49. 100' Northeast RM P(RH-30) RM Add Public (P) Agree with PC, modify Agree with Staff: of Adams Ave. (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC recommendation: recommend retain existing & Yorktown Medium underlying Medium identify add Public (P) Residential Medium Ave. Density) Residential Density) Church/School; does designation to identify Density 15 du/ac and add High Density, increase density school or church, but do Public(P) designation (DM 2) 30 un/ac) from 15 to 30 du/ac not increase density from (Straw Vote 6-0) 15 to 30 du/ac, retain existing Residential Medium Density (15 du/ac) 50. South side of RM CN- Fl RM - FP2 Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff. retain Hamilton Ave. (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC: retain existing Residential 400' east of Medium Neighborhoo Medium Density to existing medium density Medium Density (RM-15) Bushard St. Density) d, Density Density, Commercial residential, no change to designation, no change to 0.35 FAR) Floodplain) Neighborhood commercial designation commercial designation to (DM 20) to the west the west 51. Northeast corner CG RM - 15 CG-FP2 Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff:' of Hamilton Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: existing recommend retain existing' & Brookhurst General) Medium General, to Residential commercial would Commercial General (CG- Street. Density 15' Floodplain) Medium Density become non-conforming, Fl) designation (Straw un/ac) designation should reflect Vote 6-0) (DM 19) existing conditions and uses, retain existing Commercial General designation Approved as of December 12, 1995 15 (g\cclndusl) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE TONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 52 RL CN - F1 CG Change from Agree with PC disagree Disagree with Staff& Northwest g g � g g corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Low with GPAC: no change to GPAC; recommend retain Indianapolis Low Neighborhoo General) Density to current designation, existing Residential Low Ave. & Bushard Density) d, FAR 0.35) Commercial property owner will be Density 7.0 du/ac, no St. Neighborhood required to request zone change to existing change or general plan designation, NOTE: (DM 7) amendment at time of inconsistent with Zoning development proposal (Straw Vote 5-0) 53. Northwest OS-C RL -6.5 LUD-CZ- Change from Open Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of Pacific (Open Space (Residential FP2 (Limited Space Conservation with GPAC: retain recommend retain Open Coast Highway - Low Density, Use District, to Residential Low existing Open Space Space Conservation (OS-C)' & Brookhurst Conservatio 6.5 un/ac) Coastal Zone, Density in a portion Conservation designation designation (Straw Vote 4- St. (White Hole n) Floodplain) of the White Hole 1) area) Area DM 22&29) 54. Southwest RM RL -6.5/RH- Magnolia Modify designations Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: corner of (Residential 30 Pacific to reflect existing with GPAC: modify recommend retain existing Magnolia St. & Medium (Residential Specific Plan and approved land designation and map to Residential Medium Density Hamilton Ave. Density) Low Density, use map designations reflect specific plan 15 du/ac designation and NESI (Aston) 6.5 un/ac, to conform to designation add Specific Plan (Straw site Residential specific plan (MDR- Vote 6-0) High Density, 15) DM 14 30 un/ac 55. 100' North of RL RM- 15 RMP Change from Agree with PC, disagree. Agree with Staff. Yorktown Ave., (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Low to with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing west side of Low Medium Manufactured Residential Medium existing Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 Brookhurst St. Density) Density, 15 Home Park) Density, increase in Density designation and du/ac designation and add un/ac) density from 7 to 15 add Mobile Home Mobile Home Overlay (DM 6) un/ac to reflect Overlay (Straw Vote 6-0) existing density of Mobile Home Park Approved as of December 12, 1995 16 (g\cclndus1) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 56. 1000' South of CG RM- 15 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: Garfield Ave., (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing west side of General) Medium General) to Residential existing Commercial Commercial General (CG- Brookhurst St. Density, 15 Medium Density General designation F1) designation (Straw un/ac) Vote 6-0) (DM 6) 57. 1,000 feet south CG RH-30 RH Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: of Atlanta Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Residential Commercial General with GPAC:do not recommend to designate east side of General) High Density, High Density) and Residential increase density to reflect entire site Residential Beach Blvd., 30 un/ac) Medium to density bonus, designate Medium Density 15 du/ac (Breakers RM RH Residential High entire site Medium (Straw Vote 6-0) Development) (Residential RH- 30 (Residential Density, density Density Residential to Medium (Residential High Density) increase from 15 to reflect existing conditions (DM 14) Density) High Density, 30 du/ac 30 un/ac) 58. Northwest and CG RMH- 25 CG Change from Agree with PC, disagree Agree with Staff: southwest of (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing Joliet Ave. & General) Medium High General) to Residential existing commercial Commercial General (CG- Beach Blvd. Density, 25 Medium High Density designation F1) designation (Straw un/ac) Vote 6-0) (DM 12) W. Northwest RM n(RA4H 25) RM Add-P-uhlte(P-) Disc, Fee w th CPA r; Deleted; change to General eerner of (-Residential Public (Residential designation to refleet sehool has been removed Plan designation has been Vu,noxville-Ave: Medium underlying Medium sehoobehureh--, and site developed previously approved Beach-Blvdd. Density) Residential Density) inerease in density (6eeystene) at Medium from 15 to 25 du/ae Resedenfial Medium MM4-2) Density 25 Density 15 updae, rete dotae existing land use designfituon-. Approved as of December 12, 1995 17 (g\cclndusl) DM 34 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council) 76. RM (Residential RL-6.5 (Residential Low RI -CZ(Residential Residential Low Density 7.0 du/ac Medium Density) Density 6.5 du/ac) Low Density,Coastal Zone 77. Mixed Use RM- 15,CR-F1 -SP Huntington Harbour Mixed Use and add Specific Plan (Residential Medium Density 15 Bay Club Specific (SP)designation du/ac,Commercial Regional, Plan Density 0.35 FAR,Specific Plan ** , WARNER AVE e: ILLy N� 1 ^'� EDGE«.*[i ''" LJI CF-R �' - p� :.ro. . � I -2111 i �� . • o, < CF-R � _ &I , N ILELED �/• WARNER 0! V.TCS .vE I Cis\o� i o i 0, 9C/ 0 C \\ DM 35 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council) 18. RM (Residential OS Park(Open Space, OS-PR(Open Space,Parks Open Space-Park(OS-P) Medium Density) Park and Recreation 75. OS-R CV- F1 (Commercial CF-C -CZ Open Space Recreation and add (Open Space- Visitor,Density 0.35 FAR) (Community Facilities,Civic Public(P)designation Recreation) Uses,Coastal Zone 76. RM (Residential RL-6.5(Residential Low R1-CZ(Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 du/ac Medium Density) Density 6.5 du/ac) Density,Coastal Zone Y•� \ 'f m f • SEG 10M v is ctij oa BE sty WARNER AVE \ °°F� i I i DM 36 No Land Use Changes I BO 9 A O I � 00 9� L' F II I I 9 � I I DM 37 No Land Use Changes FT 1 \ I i i •o r•i q C� 44 T T e � DM 38 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION by City Council) 81. Residential RL-6.5 (Residential Ellis Golden West Specific Residential Estate 3 du/ac Estate; 3 du/ac Low Densitv 6.5 du/ac) Plan 82. Residential Estate; 4 RL-6.5 (Residential Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Residential Estate 4 du/ac and du/ac and Open Low Density 6.5 du/ac) (Residential Low Density,4 Open Space-Park designations Space-Recreation and Open Space-Park un/ac & Open Space) "''�1 � 1 J J• Q"+4l dl r • - -J � - V M.I i 'J III a',��.n /sl'�¢ r'� --� t,,,. • ' •° • 4 • / / I{ I I I 1 I � ``\ • ��`� / � I III I I I I IVY ate` / wfTT1RT1Wuu_:.14�C] I�f_;frr:i1"",iilTiliilinl II II II IIh 111111111111 rnnnnnngmnnnln / I MITI IIIIIIIIII II IIII III I---------r----- / I I nTTT7TTITIT Rl T1T�T1•i 11 / I NIII III III IIb IIIIII I11111 i '- L1+n nnnly p�nrynfi*7+ L-+ , I I I I1111111�1 :11111111111 I I ( I Il I , ICII IIIr / •:��;��;�. II i: L•..., m II I i i / If •a. ...L �..1-I''ul ::1...�,r -1 i I i..,....1..J 1 f (.._�_.i. r� f-i�c Fa 1;�;...i I = I ; 1 tea: fir._„� 11 y 2 I 'III W 1 2 � 1 W ..J C u I �4Rp�f�o I I 4V E. DM 39 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION Citv Council) 16. Mixed MH - F3-30-SP(Mixed Use Pacifica Community. Mixed Use and add Specific Plan Development Horizontal, Density 1.0 FAR,30 Plan (SP) un/ac,Specific Plan 71. Mixed P(MH -F3-30-SP) Public- Pacifica Community Mixed Use, add Specific Plan (SP) Development underlying Mixed Use Horizontal, Plan Density 1.0 FAR,30 un/ac, Specific Plan 72. Mixed CG-F2- D (Commercial CO (Commercial Mixed Use Horizontal,decrease Development General, Density 0.5 FAR, Design Office) density from 25 to 15 du/ac Overlay �_1 � � I .._.... � 1T; O 1 m C F R 4 C F R ,I lii `s iill i DR I II I " __ • DKTARIO DR ' CF-R C F—.,C I �j ,y,�,,. '�pV�BED DR CF-C I 6 aecRs DR 8 - 1UwW4'w DR YUKON DR I I•� I I � � I III III � I I r • ELLf5 � cv(. k I N �Y R •i CR I I I Ij IJr IIJrT IL) r _ a I W .I 1 z 0 jj-, .......... z zc_7s.n•, z W IE- " I GARFIELD AVE- -17 BOULEVARD \ HUNTINGTON BEACH \l, 1 C o _ p Gl[M. SI pCD .� � I - - f • b b t r :1) �•Sl llr�■ , 71�� <■ 1, I fA ■ to nl g 1 D AM LM •�i nl■aw l■ 1 llS1ER•: --.._Y `•/7..;.�.__-..�!!tl - �` �`- —L-- — - __ WN1R7 N � fa 7 ��, ��-- 115A IN .. :• u� 'ull/41111 +nuro ra 1 V. f GfvIIIIr111-IIf 1 III III 111___II/EN))) 5 s — _ 1 _ �91IJ'i jfI111.1TE i i 1 — 9_-- 7 liy lra„• a `� Lr• �'- f Y �r•+ - - � �'F - - • • Y n Mlpa. f I — — �—� r1 OYn S, -L-- SOV1NEaN 6 CALIF EDISON ,`. co i� I fr l 1 sl en 1 1 fur. 4Nu a b t m n ' r IMDGISCLIA �- �- STREET Rr - Y DM 40 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS; PLAN (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council 17. RM (Residential P(RMH-25)Public-underlying RMH Public(P) designation,increase Medium Density) Residential Medium High Density 25 (Residential density from 15 to 25 du/ac un/ac Medium High Density) 73. RL(Residential P(RL-6.5)Public-underlying RL(Residential Residential Low Density 7.0 Low Density) Residential Low Density 6.5 du/ac Low Density) du/ac,add Public 74. RM (Residential P(RMH-25)Public-underlying RMH Residential Medium Density 15 Medium Density) Residential Medium High Density 25 (Residential du/ac and add Public(P) du/ac Medium High Density) 95. RL(Residential Western half-CG-F1 (Commercial PS(Public Public(P) designation; retain Low Density) General,Density 0.35 FAR), Semi Public) maximum 7.0 du/ac Residential Eastern half-RL-6.5(Residential Low Low Density designation Density 6.5 du/ac ATTACHMENT 6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT V,"jC Environmental Board CITY OF HUN1_'!_HNG110.N PE—CH eilch, Colifu:ni�; CJ/("-!� Tl',(.I(I\lif A(H Po�l r March 21, 1996 Ms. Linda Niles Senior Planner Community Development Department 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Linda: Thank you very much for attending the Environmental Board meeting on March 14, 1996. Your comments regarding the Board's concerns on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Comprehensive General Plan Update were informative and enlightening. We appreciated learning about the limitations that planners also face. Again, thank you for addressing the Board's concerns and updating us on the timeline for the Comprehensive General Plan Update. Sincerely, Aa9net Burkland Secretary, Environmental Board • .J- Je Environmental Board ZJLJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HVNTINGTO%BFACH PcS1 O{hce BOX 190 Hunlongion Beach, Cah-lornla 92648 January 14, 1996 ^~ ' �N;J 3 01996 Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner Department of Community Development`:; r 2000 Main Street ` Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms. Niles: The City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board received a response to comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Huntington Beach Draft General Plan from Envicom Corporation in late November, 1995. Envicom has failed to address various issues raised in our letter and did not provide a reasoned analysis of those issues as required under CIeary vs County of Stanislans. Our detailed comments on their responses are provided in the attachment to this letter. Specifically, the Board is opposed to the designation of beaches as parkland. Second, we object to the zoning of wetlands, private or public, for residential use, and said zoning should be changed to open space conservation so that developme,t cannot occur. The Board is aware of the fact that the comment period is over, but would request that the i City Council or decision makers present our comments at the public?tearing before i certification of the final EIR, and that responses be provided to us and be included in the final EIR. The Board would also like to be advised of the meeting date of the hearing for the Draft EIR so that we can have representation regarding these unaddressed issues. Thank you in advance for your response to Tom Ryan,Environmental Board Chairperson, regarding the hearing date and time. Sincerely, Tom Ryan, Chairperson For the City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board pp%L ATTACHMENT ADAMS AVENUE WIDENLNGS The Huntington Beach Transportation Division states that 8 lanes are required for future traffic volumes. The City of Costa Mesa states that Adams Avenue in Costa Mesa is designated as a 6-lane roadway on the Master Plan of Highways and is considered adequate for future traffic volumes. Costa Mesa has determined that the Adams Avenue segment in Huntington Beach would also be adequate at 6 lanes. The Board cannot agree to the 8-lane widening at Adams Avenue as that will exacerbate high noise ratines for the residents of the area, and 6 lanes is adequate. DELETION OF 19TH STREETBAI' NTT G AVE. & GISLER/GARFIELD AVE. The City of Costa Mesa views the deletion of the 19th Street-Banning Avenue and Gisler/Ga;field Avenue �'anta River crossin`s as a beneficial asieC.. since it is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Costa Mesa Gercral Pla,. %Ve recommend that this should be stated in the Draft E1R for further support of these crossings being deleted from the Cif}, of Huntington Beach General Plan. OVERCROWDING 13\1 PUBLIC SCHOOLS & AVAILABILITY OF NEW SITES Pertinent information related to student welfare as requested by Ms. Patricia Reid Koch, Huntington Beach Union School District (HBUSD) has not been provided by Envicom: o designated schools that will be attended by students generated (from Plan development) o noise analysis prepared identifying potential vehicular conflicts with schools o air quality analysis and deterioration that would affect students from increased vehicular traffic o projected enrollments, student generation factors, space requirements, bussing requirements o fiscal impact on the Districts including projected cost of land acquisition, school construction, operations and maintenance. Such a lack of disclosure for public scrutiny does got enable the school district to evaluate the adverse impacts of the Draft General Plan since projections for Edison, Huntington Beach, and i.`Ilarina High Schools will surpass 100% of capacity by 1999/2000. The response by Envicom citing Sections 15146(a) and 15381 of the CEQA Guidelines is incorrect. If the Draft General Plan (GP) will lead to construction of new school facilities, the lead agency must state in the GP whether spaces have been reserved for new school sites to prevent overcrowding by 22%, and the new school sites must be disclosed. Furthermore, CEQA requires that in the event of a public controversy over this issue, the lead agency must categorically state that additional land for new school sites will be provided to prevent 22% overcrowding. The HBUSD asked for area densities, development phasing, designated schools, etc. to be included in the DEIR in order to provide a full analysis and disclosure of impacts. The Envicom response stated it is not possible for the DEIR to accurately_ project these requests except to say that schools would be significantly impacted. NOISE LEVELS N SCHOOLS The HBUSD letter provides projected noise levels in school sites that exceed current recommended levels. The response of Envicom is that "the various school districts that serve the City are encouraged to identify currently impacted schools through its own studies and work with the City to implement mitigation measures." If the noise levels will be increased as a direct result of the City's proposed GP,then it is the responsibility of the lead agency to provide adequate mitigation measures to offset such impacts. The City cannot postpone mitigation measures to some indefinite future time. Envicom has repeatedly and wrongly cited C"QA sections with a view to avoid providing required information and p.opcsed mitigation measures to offs-, averse impacts identified in the DEIR. SCAG HOUSDgG PROJECTIONS Section G9 of the letter by City of Sea] Beach questions that exceeding SCAG projections be considered beneficial. After speaking with Glenn Blossom, who drafted the letter from SCAG, these references to the SCAG Section K2 as proving in some way that exceeding SCAG plan is considered beneficial is completely erroneous. Glenn Blossom stated that there is no basis for assuming that exceeding SCAG projections is beneficial in any way, and that a mutually agreeable projection at the City• level is pending. We recommend that the Class IV designation be changed to Class III or Class II based on these facts, in the final EIR. EXCESS AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS The Citv of Seal Beach letter shows Excess Air Quahry Emissions that states increased air quality emissions of 275 times greater than that allowed by AQMP(and will -inevitably require federal intervention for air quality management). This fact has not been discussed in the EIR. Envicom's response was that"the City's buildout projections which served as the basis for the latest AQ.MP did not accurately reflect the City's true buildout under its existing Plan.... (therefore)the future emissions inventory is not an -accurate baseline to work from." This is an inadequate response because it arbitrarily ignores the concerns of the Board and the City of Seal Beach as well. Seal Beach specifically requests a potential development scenario which would stay within the anticipated emissions "2010 budget". If none of the Proposed Alternative Plans would meet the anticipated emissions budget, it should be so stated. INADEQUATE GP POLICIES AND NO DETAILS ON ALTERNATIVE PLANS The City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board's request in letter section H5 for discussion of an Alternative level of buildout that would NOT require improvements to be made, was "considered to be beyond the scope of an alternative analysis for and EIR as defined in Section 15126d of the CEQA guidelines." 15126d Subsection 3 of the CEQA guidelines requires the discussion of alternatives "even if this would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives. or would be more costly." Page 13-133 Sections H 16 and H 18 response to the City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board's comments is totally erroneous. It should be stated in the DEIR and General Plan that the City of Huntington Beach will fully adhere to the wetland resources policy that will not allow any net loss of wetland acreage and habitat values. LACK OF MITIGATION MEASURES FOR BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Page 13-135,136.137 (H33) response to reduce adverse impacts to biological resources states that future studies and biological surrey reports will be used to offset adverse impacts. Any reports and studies cannot be considered as mitigation measures pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. i;;�: lean agency has not assured the public that 4dveTSC iml:,pacts identified through such stud iesireports A iil be fuI'1v mitigated. Further, it shoul.J be stated in the DEIR and General Plan that the City of Huntington Beach will fully adhere to the wetland resources police that will not allow any net loss of wetland acreage and habitat values. We further recommend that wetland parcels. whether private or public, should be changed from residential to permanent open space conservation for wildlife use. The few remaining wetlands in the City of Huntington Beach must be permanently protected. The current zoning creates wetlands loopholes to appease vested interests. and do not protect the few acres of wetlands left in the City. HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE SITES .wEQUACY The response to the Board on Page 13-139 111'39 refers to requests for maximum quantity )!emits on storing hazardous waste due to increased development intensifying the existing problems with diminishing hazardous waste disposal sites. The Envicom response is that "this is beyond the scope of the Program EIR." The DEIR should state whether existing hazardous waste disposal and storage sites will be adequate to handle the increase in hazardous waste generated as a result of future growth under the Plan, and if not will, this require construction of new facilities. Envicom has failed to disclose the capacity of existing hazardous waste facilities and what potential exists for future expansion. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE PERMITTED PEAR CONTAMINATED SITES The DEIR does not disclose whether hazardous waste sites can be improved by remediation measures. The response of Envicom on page 13-139 H42 that "this comment does not address an environmental issue or the adequacy of the DEIR therefore no response is required" is totally erroneous. Page 13-140 H47 The Board stated that mitigation measures proposed for reducing increased hazardous waste generation to less than significant levels is inadequate. Envicom response is that "the Hazardous Materials Element of the Draft General Plan is not .. intended to be a comprehensive update to the City's existing element" and implies that existing material policies and ordinances currently in place in the City are adequate. There is a lack of disclosure as to how current City ordinances will mitigate increased hazardous waste generation to less than significant levels. INAPPROPRIATE USE OF BEACHES L'�' PARKLAND DESIGNATION The response to the Board's comments on page 13-145 Section H76 state that the Citv Department of Community Services requested that beaches be included in the City's existing parkland acreage. The Board recommends that beaches should NOT be included as parkland because beaches are subject to intertidal influence, are overcrowded by persons from the regional area, are not only for City dwellers, are not fully utilized only by the City, and are.not available at all times or seasons. SCAG LETTER Page 13-159 through I'-i,'S of the collective DFiR i�sponst- r ^s a letter frog. SCAG to which Envicom repeatedly refers in response to several commenters. including the City of HB Environmental Board. The paragraph referenced "K2" says that efforts are currently underwav to resolve inconsistencies in housing projection between the City and SLAG. However, Envicom uses this reference repeatedly as though it answers the question of inconsistency. and somehow backs up the claim in the DEIR that exceeding the SCAG plan by 22% is considered "beneficial." Having spoken to Glenn Blossom personally, I verified that: o efforts are currently underway to resolve inconsistencies in projections e exceeding SCAG plan is NOT considered beneficial. These statements should be included in the DEIR and General Plan. LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS CREST VIEW SCHOOL SITE Saint Vincent de Paul Catholic Church I lesia Cat6lica de San Vicente de Paul 8345 Talbert Avenue Huntington Beach,California 92646-1599 19Gc r E L` (714) 842-3000 FAx (714)842-6780 13 October 1995: City Of Huntington Beach Planning Commission RECEIVED FROM _ Community Development Department AND MADE A PART OF THE R`EC D AT�fHE 2000 Main Street COUNCIL MEETING OF °21�.{9f OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CONNIE BROCKWAY.CITY CLERK Attn: Linda Niles With regard to the Land Use Recommendations of the Proposed General Plan, we are very concerned about location No. 95 1300' SE of Beach and Talbert (Western 1/2 of Crest View School)). We absolutely do not support the plan to change this area to Commercial General (CG-F1) for the following reasons: 1.) We prefer to maintain a residential quality to this property in the neighborhood or to maintain its use as a school. 2.) There seems to be more than sufficient commercial property in the immediate and nearby areas of the city. Huntington Beach does not need more available commercial propoerty. 3.) We are not encouraged by the eventual increase of traffic on Talbert Avenue near the Church and cemetery and the inevitable congestion and noise it would bring. Most importantly, we very strongly prefer to maintain a residential quality to our area as much as possible and to not have the commercial busy traffic of Beach Boulevard encroach even more into our neighborhood. S' cerely submitted,f� R rend Jerome T. Karcher Pastor cc: Most Reverend Michael Driscoll, Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Orange Orange County Congregation Community Organization (OCCCO) �� yn r� z T I. l waf SUBJECT: CR l3T VIEW SCHOOL PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE d igr,F; (No. 45" -- Proposed General Plan Advisory Committee Land Use Recommendation April 5, 1995) We, the undersigned urge the Huntington Beach Planning Commission not to change the existing zoning of Crest View School (300' SE of Beach and Talbert) from Community Facilities Education to General Commercial. We are residents of the Crest View School neighborhood with major street boundaries of Beach Blvd. , Talbert, Ellis and Newland. our neighborhood is closest to the proposed commercial development and would clearly be most affected by it. Currently the school is used by church groups, sporting events, nursery/day school and families for a greenbelt/play area. We are against any type of commercial venture -- whether it be a strip mall or Wal Mart store -- being placed so near to our homes because of the following: 1. Our home values would go down. There would be no incentive to fix up our houses. w 2. More traffic. Beach Boulevard has plenty. Any Q YW type of commercial development would put extra traffic w� on Talbert and possibly on streets through our c 0�: neighborhood. Q �U _ < 3. Trucks/unloading at all hours would be a LLLL disturbance. o<ZWm 4. More law enforcement needed to respond to the LL<WU_Z inevitable problems of greater numbers of people who Oo2oz congregate at strip malls and the like. >QU U W ra Z w z o 5. The character of our neighborhood would forever Q u change from a fairly quiet, decent, family-oriented neighborhood to one which would most certainly attract residents from neighboring cities (especially if a Wal Mart is built) . We say this situation would rapidly change and bring a bad element to our neighborhood once commercial development is brought so close to our homes. There are two strip malls already at Beach and Talbert. They service our neighborhood adequately now. The 5 Points Shopping Center is used by many of us also. There are plenty of existing commercial zones in Huntington Beach with vacant buildings in need of tenants/owners. Why not utilize what's already there instead of causing more urban blight and destroying our neighborhood. 40 Oz� ,4n• 0 To: The Mayor, City Council, and Planning Commissioners Subject: Proposed Land Use Designation Change for the Crest View School (District Map 40, Item No. 95) Date: October 4, 1995 We, the residents of the Crest View School neighborhood, take issue with the City of Huntington Beach to change the Land Use Designation of 1/2 of the Crest View School from Residential Low Density to Commercial General. The Crest View School is located 300' directly East of the SE corner of Beach Blvd and Talbert Ave. What this means is that the school property will now be available for commercial development. What the residents who live in this area have heard through various channels, is that this land is being seriously considered for the building of a Wal Mart store, and the "true intention" is to rezone all this land as Commercial General. This is completely unacceptable to all of us — the residents who live in the Crest View School neighborhood. The justification of our position, is that the rezoning of this land is in direct contrast on numerous fronts to our City's own Draft General Plan (GP), dated April 5, 1995, and Amendment 94-2 dated Sept. 26, 1995. As the notification letter sent to us declares, the GP is considered to be the "constitution" of the City. It is the duty of the Planning Commission and City Council to follow the policies contained within this "constitution". The foremost conflict arises from the GP's Land Use (Amendment 94-2)statement LU 13.1.6: "Encourage surplus schools and other public properties to be made available first for other public purposes, such as parks, open space, schools, adult or child care". The statement goes on to say that any reuse and/or development shall be determined by "compatibility with the type and character of adjacent uses." LU (Amendment 94-2) 13.1.7a. Furthermore,the utilization will include the "maintenance of active, usable open space for use by the surrounding neighborhood." (LU Amendment 94-2 13.1.7 f.) We strongly believe that rezoning to Commercial General use violates this concept. With a City park being some distance away, the school land is often used for relaxation by the neighborhood as our "green belt area". In addition, soccer games and practices are frequently held on the playing field. Portions of the school are used for preschool and community church services. The City should continue to make these uses available as stated in the GP LU Issue#18: "....network of parks and open spaces that represent a significant recreational and visual asset for residents....". We feel that the development of any portion of this land for a large retail store is not compatible to the open space purpose and the "adjacent use" of day care and single family homes. In addition from GP Amendment 94-2, we are aware that the GP Advisory Committee and Staff recommend changing the zoning of the entire school property to Commercial General. There will be no open space available. , A second conflict of this re-zoning proposal to the General Plan is with LU 10.1.6: "adequately protect the residential use from the excessive or incompatible impacts of noise, light, traffic, visual character, and operational hazards." Furthermore, with regard to housing, LU Issue#4 states that some areas "have been characterized by a significant deterioration in their quality, resulting in declining property values and increased social problems and crime." And lastly, LU Issue #13 states: "Traff-ic from many commercial areas is intruding onto adjacent residential streets." All of these issues greatly concern us in the Crest View School neighborhood. In particular, a decline in the value of our homes has us especially angered. Many of us have been remodeling our homes over the years. We take pride in our community and homes,while we are also increasing their value. With the building of a large retail store in our neighborhood, the assessed value of our homes will instantly drop. We know this for a fact from speaking with several appraisers. The reasons are always the same; more people, traffic, crime, etc. Real Estate agents are always quick to point out that a house is "close to the school". They don't emphasize that a large retail complex is in your backyard. This decline in the quality of neighborhoods is specifically what the General Plan wishes to avoid. The rezoning of the Crest View School land is contradictory to this policy.' We do not want to end up like many areas of Santa Ana. With our home values suddenly declining, we will be "at risk". With a large retail center located on this rezoned land, traffic in and around our neighborhood will dramatically increase. The GP makes many statements regarding traffic on Beach Boulevard, and the overflow onto residential streets. In lieu of this fact, the Land Use Element Table LU-6 states for Subarea 6G (includes Crest View): "Limit access to and from Beach Boulevard, clustering driveways and entrances as feasible for multiple businesses." This means that the entrances and exits for a Wal Mart, or other large center, will connect to Talbert Avenue. People will then have a choice to either turn left and add to the congestion of Beach Blvd, or go right and add to Talbert,Newland, and Magnolia. The Crest View neighborhood has streets which connect Talbert to Ellis,and others which connect to Beach Boulevard. How long will it be before shoppers discover this "shortcut", and begin driving in front of our homes? Some will even get lost. We do not want strangers and traffic creating even more noise and endangering our children. We already are affected by the current flow along Beach Boulevard. Do not make the situation worse. When one reviews the GP school location map PF-4, it is evident that Crest View is truly the only local school for our neighborhood. Is it wise to change the zoning and lose the possibility of a school forever? This conflicts with GP Issue #19 which states: "forecasts of population growth and demographic characteristics clearly indicate a need for additional classroom space in the future." If the school does not return for our young people, then perhaps it could eventually be converted to use by those on the "other end" of the age spectrum. RCSE Issue#8 proclaims: "...increases in the senior population.... would increase demand for senior services. The City should assess possibilities for building a new facility in the future to meet increased demand." These concepts we believe are more beneficial to our neighborhood and the community as a whole, than with another retail "mega center". With regard to "another" shopping center, rezoning the entire Crest View school site (as recommended in the Staff Report), would create a huge complex. According to the Land Use Intensity Schedule category -F1, the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.35 would result in a retail center of 210,000 sq ft. [total land area of 600,000 sq ft X 0.351. The GP lists the nearby Loehmann's 5 Points Plaza (Beach Blvd & Main), as 155,000 sq ft, and this is a big plaza. For comparison, the "Crest View Complex" will be 35% larger than 5 Points! Is this really necessary? Have the effects been fully thought out? What about competition with the existing retail centers? The GP LU Issue#9 makes note of "over concentration of commercial centers... ....resulting in vacancies." A large retail store, such as Wal Mart, could seriously damage the sales at other stores; resulting in them going out of business. The overall sales and income to the City would be essentially unchanged; it would merely shift locations. If the thought is that a large "super store" would bring in additional tax revenue, it would have to be as the result of shoppers coming from outside Huntington Beach. People from cities such as Garden Grove, Westminster, Costa Mesa, and Santa Ana would be inclined to shop here. What concerns us is that these cities have gang problems, and gangs are always looking for "new turf' to infiltrate. Huntington Beach already deals with a large influx of people to the beaches ("Downtown on July 4th in particular"), and it concerns us that more people will now be coming into our neighborhood. The GP Amendment No 94-2 makes recommendations with regard to retail vacancies, restructuring Beach Boulevard, creating a "district of regional commercial activity" for Edinger Ave(Subarea 5C), and promoting development of Huntington Center. We think that this makes good sense, as it wiH be able to provide outside shoppers with closer access to the 405, and reduce the "invasion" into our neighborhood. We, the residents of Crest View School neighborhood, believe that the Planning Commission and City Council must review these serious concerns we have outlined above. We recommend that they follow the true intentions written in the City's General Plan, and vote to maintain the existing zoning for the Crest View School as Public-Semi Public. Sincerely, The Neighborhood Residents of Crest View School (Signatures to be presented at the Planning Meeting) Subject: Crest View School Proposed Zoning Change 10, ' Ilk ��� L Name -Address N e Address Name Address l �17/ vtt 14,6of �K Name Address a'�n� j!J /M l VAS CAIC Name Address I ' Name Address .1jal& N Name Address N e / Address r le h Name Address Name Addres Name t Address 2-05-95 O l : 2 CITY CL){R-; 7r0; (ECUYED /_ el-/05/19•_a 12194 7i4E:1-4 r•h CITY CLck!\ FUNKY DIVA �t���:.�,� PAGE E,1 r In11 QED 3 49 Pi :� `B 51996 02-05-96 ;^ y Ur To: City Staff, Council Members, Mayur and OV District Office. CITY opnCE ca . From: Deborah and Chris Hendrix, 18322 Thomas Circle, H.B. 92W. RE: The rezoning of the Crest View Property, We are strongly against the rezoning. We moved here, from the San Fernando Valley, tender the impression that Huntington beach was a good place to raise a family and live in a safe environment. When we were looliog for a house, 3 yrs ago, we drove through the City and visited the malls. We were happy with what we saw. We saw a community that stood the test of the eying times and we accredited that to the strong community organizations. Over the last 3 years we have seen some decline in the family envirorunent that we thougat we were buying into. We are seeing gangs of kids hanging out in front of liquor stores, we have had our car broken into and wo have noticed vacant stores on Beach blvd with some vandalism. I realize that the community services can only do so much and that the rest relies on the community itself. This is why this neighborhood is fighting this proposal, because it will gust add to the problems this city is going to be facing in the next 1.0 years. I saw the Valley decline at a much faster rate than this, however if you do not tako all of these signs seriously you will have more problems than you can imagine. I know •,fiat all of you live here and you want H.B, to remain a pleasant place to live. To ensure this, you must look at why this c=munity has survived as long as it has. The General Plan is a good onc. It encouraged families to move and stay here. This neighborhood needs an elementary school more than a bunch of empty shops. Please do not kid yourself'into thinking that will not happen, Just look around. If we cannot have the school then it niust remain open space or more residential property and open space. As for the school district. I know the schools need money, but you cannot arbitrarily change zoning just*beea3use it particular group wants to make more money. The school district can sell to a residential developer. We can't just have ow' house rezoned so we can sell it for more money and neither can the school district. vvw% 40 • No I IS INDIANAPOLIS AND BUSHARD 20471 Bushard Street Huntington Beach, CA 92646 November 12, 1995 Department of Community development Planning Commission Chairman, Members 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 22548 Subject : LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS CF THE PROPOSED DRAFT GENERAL FLAN DM 7 , NO. 52 , 20471 BUSHARD at the NW CORNER OF EUSHARD S INDIANAPOLIS Dear Commission Chairman and 'embers, As ,you may recall, the above referenced property was _r.e most discussed acenda _-rem cf the '�lanninc Commission ^•eeting cn 'Zeptem-Der _^. _0_95. 1 cu'cn _ was present -:-,at night, 1 was not planning to speak since 1 was in czmp-ete acr eement wit!-. :rAC to keep t.^.e =.^.:71.^.C_ of cur pr Omer"i as Commercial Neighborhood. Powever, it appears that due to the hysteria generated %y one Individual living near our property, we may lose the zoning designation that we `lave had since _0-67. Because cf this, I spoke at .he next meeting o:, vctober. _Z, and stated our position and reasons why this property must remain as is. When our property was su:,c_vided in 1967, :e did NO' keep this last parcel for future development to residential, and it was desianeG nor and =oned for commercial. As '✓our sta2i knows, driveway access any :'tomes that may be t... woUl-d face onto 5ushard and Indianapolis because of the ) ot size. An attractive commercial development would require only a sincie driveway on each street, and result less :aific intrusions than a number of private drives. The enclosed photos of two medical or professional offices show what I refer to as an attractive commercial development. These offices would not cause the heavy increase in traffic, accidents or noise, nor would they be any kind of attractive nuisance fcr children or students from the local schools. Because of the efforts of one person, George Naff. who is a homeowner living directly across Bushard Street from my property, several people have become concerned that a "strip center" is already planned for construction ! He has circulated the two fliers that I have attached for your review, Showing his name and number at the bottom of each. Please also note the dates of 9/14/95 and 10/14/95 in small print at the lower right corner of each. The first Mier was planned and printed by Mr. Neff within THREE days of Dm `1 N o• SL your notice of public hearings to discuss proposed '_and use recommendations. By misrepresenting the truth and 'lying about the "strip center" he has created the hysteria that you experienced at your meeting of September 26. Mr. Naff was told by your department staff that no permits have been pulled nor was any action taken by myself to build any type of development. He has circulated these fliers and told anyone that telephones him that a strip center is planned. He has refused to believe the posslb==-ty that anything else would be built on our property, and `:e ^as refused to believe that we are not interested in selling or teveloping our property at this t--:e. "he second flier was clrciiiated by ';r. Naff after he =eft e had "won" a v1Ct over =enTer" that has 'o-, even been plannea. As to= ore. - e passed U1lt fl_Er= -o PaSS2na Car to=ed ccvies --o .ne _:on zocr s Cf r every home in the neighboring area, and warned callers that the property will ce ceve_cped _..to a St. -p center. And then.. to make matters worse, ' r. wank Goldman of the city Historic Resources Board, and also a neighbor of our property, uses his board pos_tien to attempt to sway your Vote. the enclosed letter to Mayor Lelpc=e and the City Council i:embers should v.N'L*� -nexe r eco'mendat_o'_ Ce_tinen-_ to the conservation and preservatlon of the clty ' s historic resources. Si^ce our • roperty .,as no apparent historic interest, the Board members have no :icht to make any cone charge recommendations as they have this letter, and '-ney should be =t:ona ' y rem-nded cf =he__ sole Y:.r rose and objectives. _ In light of these facts. = would Iike to :eoue_t that this agenda item as well as your straw vote be reviewed at your scheduled meeting of November 28, 1995. ;his will allow time for your final decision as scheduled for the -eetine of December 12, and hopefully reason., _rather than emotion will carry the day. I do not believe in mudslinging and innuendc, to get my way, but I do believe in working with our neighbors when the day comes to do something with our property. I firmly believe in the property rights that we have and the zoning that has been in effect for almost 20 years. Please feel free to call anytime if necessary at 714-964-9052. Sincerely, Dennis L. Holtz attachments Page - 2 1. r q ,I iiha ��:If I '� •� �;' ;� ` �(�-;'. 1; 'riff I '� ;q� r � •}1 1 - I,�- .Ili'' ��k1f 1 I 1 , ` f, 'r '•t�'',_ `. ,IttlC I1.'11�� -1 .�I,� (��. �I I�'1"h'; I _'t ', jf.'�, � � I J I' , u,c� ,I A , � 11��1 4 f`,,.1. ` � `• I I>-. '11 9 � ... I 1 �. t•r1 -j� jt, - f I � '9� �!111.1 f�. � t i1,r t I \' ' I (j. ,t ,;+, •ICI(:;.`,:. ,I '.i 1 t "STRIP CENTER IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD" --- UPDATE --- WE WON ROUND ONE IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST THE STRIP CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION CASTS "STRAW" VOTE TO KEEP THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUSHARD ! INDIANAPOLIS (THE FARM) "RESIDEN I AL" --- BUT --- CITY PLANNING DEPT. & GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE TELL CITY COUNCIL : REZONE IT "COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD" -- INCREASED TRAFFIC / ACCIDENTS / NOISE -- EASY ACCESS BY OUR CHILDREN TO LIQUOR / CIGARETTES -- POTENTIAL HANGOUT FOR GANGS / DRUG TRAFFICKING -- PROMOTES VANDALISM / GRAFFITI -- LOCAL SHOPPING CENTERS HAVE ABUNDANT EMPTY SHOPS KEEP THE CORNER RESIDENTIAL -- TO STOP THE REZONE WE MUST PETITION THE CITY COUNCIL - A NEIGHBOR WILL SOON PETITION YOU FOR YOUR SIGNATURE FOR MORE INFORMATION OR HOW YOU CAN HELP, PHONE: NAN -- 962-4707 GEORGE -- 964-9879 STAN -- 964- 9557 ,C,4W i,"le Historic Resources Board CITY 0:: UNTING70t' EE;;CH HUNTINCTbw/EACH Pos-, C''';ce Box 190 Hun,ina;or. ^eacn. Cahicrnia 92648 October 25, 1995 Mayor Victor Leipzig and Members of City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. C:. 92648 Dear flavor Leipzig and Counca Members: Re: PROPERTIES •-'11T 20471 BUSHARD STREET AND 17301 E D`NARDSiS: KAI NURSERY The Historic Resources Board held an ad hoc committee meeting on Tuesday, October 2-!, 1995. The aLove .terns were aeendized and discussed and. the fosiowmg recommendations --,--ere made: PROPERTY AT 20471 BUSHARD STREET After a discussion. the ad hoc committee made the following recommendation: R.A.: The Historic Resources Board recommends to the City Council that the zoning on the property at 20471 Bushard Street be Residential Low Density (RL) not to exceed the density of the surrounding neighborhood. SAKAI NURSERY/17301 EDXVARDS After a discussion and viewing of photos taken at the site. the ad hoc committee made the following recommendation.: R.A.: The Historic Resources Board recommends to City Council that, time be allowed for documentation of the site at the Sakai 'Nursery, its buildings and historical artifacts before demolition.. These recommendations will be taken back to the Historic Resources Board for its approval at the next regular board meeting. scheduled for November 15. 1995. Respectfully submitted. i I.�RETTA WOLFE Chairman. Historic Re,ources Board cc: Historic Resources Board Members Mary Beth Ormsbv, Assistant Planner Ron Hagan, Director, Communitv Services Dennis Holtz STOP THE STRIP CENTER IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD 1. 1. 1. OUR CITY PLANNING DEPT. RECOMMENDS THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BUSHARD / INDIANAPOLIS RE REZONED COMMERCIA L - INCREASED TRAFFIC / ACCIDENTS / NOISE - EASY ACCESS BY OUR CHILDREN TO LIQUOR / CIGARETTES - POTENTIAL HA. GOUT FOR GANGS / DRUG TRAFFICKING - PROMOTES VANDALISM / GRAFFITI - LOCAL SHOPP�G CENTERS HAVE ABUNDANT EMr. T:' SHOPS KEEP THE CORNER ZONED RESIDENTIAL WE URGE YOU TO ATTEND THE CITY PLANNING MEETING AND VOICE YOUR OPINION -- ONLY A SHOW OF CONCERNED LOCAL RESIDENTS WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE HUNTINGTON BEACH CIVIC CENTER -- COUNCIL CHAMBERS 2000 MAIN STREET AT YORKTOWN TUESDAY, SEPT. 26, 1995 7:00 P.M... FOR MORE INFORMATION PHONE: H/B PLANNING: 536-5271 OR ONE OF YOUR CONCERNED NEIGHBORS:: NAN-- 962-4707 GEORGE -- 964-9879 STAN -- 964-9557 4/ld/9S HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD The City of Huntington Beach is now accepting applications for the City Council appointment to the Historic Resources Board. The board holds monthly meetings on the third Wednesday of each month. OBJECTIVES: To provide guidance and support in an advisory capacity to City Council on matters pertaining to historic issues including preservation of historic structures and sites, museum facilities and programs. And to encourage and promote expanded historic and cultural opportunities for all residents. COMPOSITION: The board is composed of eleven members appointed by the City Council by a majority vote. The term of office of the board members shall be four years. = QUALiFiCi=+TIC vS: Appliti,ants should be concerned with protecting the overall quality of life in Huntington Beach through historic preservation and related activities. Any resident of the City of Huntington Beach may serve. i the city seeks persons with professional backgrounds and/or a commitment and sensitivity to the local history that would enable them to serve in an advisory capacity. Applicants are not selected on the basis of representing a specific discipline, business, organization or cause. APPLY TO: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Office of the Mayor 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 or to the Civic Center, 4th Floor, City Council Secretary. SELECTION: For additional information about the Historic Resources Board, please contact the Cultural Services Division at (714) 536-5258. J f4:f ii•-��/-i_--�/-ter/� � ' �.�.;�..._�•� j'..���L.cam .:s '/'��%�--�:'��--✓• '• �,.«J /' �^1 r� VARIOUS LOCATIONS J. L. Heidemann / 7070 Via Mariposa Sur Bonsall, CA. 92003 March 14, 1996 Mayor Dan Sullivan City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN Dear Mr. Sullivan: It has come to our attention the City of Huntington Beach would like to change the zoning of our property at 5772 McFadden Avenue, from Industrial General to Public - underlying Industrial. The Calvary Chapel that is leasing this property now we feel is a temporary tenant, and the other tenants on the site are industrial tenants, and when the church leaves we 'Mll want industry back into that building again. We do not want a zoning change. If you have any questions, we can be reached at: J. L. Heidemann at 619-945-7070. K.V. Heidemann at 619-940-9567. Thank you very much for you help, Sincer L. Heidemann/ eidemann c/c City Clerk General Plan Advisory Committee Planning Commission DM It) No.ZO 101 " Broadview Place Santa .na , California 92705 Y March 1 , 1996 RE: LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH I am a property owner on England Stree next to #45 and #46 designated areas. I am totally opposed to the high density land use as described in the General Advisory committee designation. I sttongly favor the Planning Commission recommendation. High density apartments in our immediate area have caused the area to deteriorate and become fragile. More high density housing would push the area, in time, to further deterioration. We currently have problems related to high density -drugs, violence and crime. These factors of high density bring all of the problems which cities then have to fight to correct and which cost more in dollars than the increased population ever brought to the city in revenues. I hope that density of only 15 units to the acre will help to preserve the already fragile neighborhood that has been severely impacted by the existing high density. Yours sincerely, David O. MacLachlan G - Cau,-c4 DALE S. NEWMAN CAROLEE A. NEWMAN CEO4600 Monarca Drive Tarzana, California 91356 14 a (818) 788-4888 l9� City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 926118 Attention: City Clerk RE: Land Use Reaon3mendatioens of Proposed General Plan City Council Hearing Scheduled for April 22, 1996 Map Designations: 58 To Whom It May Concern: We are in receipt of the copy of your Land Use Recommendations of the Proposed General Plan relating to the above matter. We hereby are in agreement with and concur that the recommendations of parcel No. 58 in the above designation item as to Commercial General shall remain want. We therefore hereby request, that the existing zoning designation continue on a permanent future basis. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, By: DALE SANFORD NEWMAN DSN/sp pv� 1Z go., f8 KENNETH A. REYNOLDS, AICP 9e21 LEILANI DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926d6 (71 a) 962-4271 Herb Fauland, Senior Planner �:�. ::� City of Huntington Beach Planning Department PO Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Subject: Draft Generai Pian Amendment Number 50 Dear Herb: This letter being written to cc-fir— o, r telep"one cc.,versation o;,, Marc,- 5, 1996 regarding the subject Draft General Plan. The City Clerks' January 31, 1996 public notice, which includes Planning Commission recommended action for Number 50 (DM 20), is wrong and the correct recommendation is for the property to remain RM with no commercial designation. We trust that this error will be corrected during a City Council study session, prior to public hearings. Thank you for your time and consideration. Very truly yours 1 K A Reynolds CITY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT R ECE YED V, o. 1996 March 4 . 1996 Connie Brockway, City Clerk Regarding the General Plan Update City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 This letter is to voice disapproval of the Planning Commission recommend at-Ions No . 50 and 2 . We do not feel any more commercial area should be allowed on Hamilton Ave . The current strip stores (Hamilton Center) are not completely rented and with the decrease in density, any more commercial buildings would create more va- cancies . (Having lived here since 1969, we don ' t recall ever seeing them all rented ) . There would be nobody to utilize any additional businesses . In addition , more stores could create more traffic and the current traffic along this street is very heavy at times . Hamilton Avenue is one of only three entrances into the City from the Costa Mesa-Newport Beach area. As far as No . 2 , why would anyone desire to build homes backed up to an apartment complex and across the street from a commercial area? All in all , we do not feel these changes are in the best interest of the City. Robert P . Bacon and Marynn G. Bacon 21432 Pensacola Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7549 (714) 968-6427 50 2- '7 P CD / L r -1 LAJ ~ C Z � 7 LAW OFFICES OF AECEIVEG / — Lire:1A Ar WI LL}AM LANDIS UITY - 1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS SUITE 1050 • CENTURY CITY FEB L7 23 �;,j '�� LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90OG7 (310) 277-3322 • 277-A-22 FAX (310) 277-1745 _ .?''• 1, February 26, 1996 FE-3 18 199 id L. Connie Brockway City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd floor Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Re: General Plan Update No. 51 Dear Ms. Brockway: There presently exists a commercial zoning at this major intersection and I intend to reaffirm this zoning in any administrative or civil proceeding. The intersection is heavily traveled with Hamilton Street allowing access over the Santa Ana River channel. A designation of residential use for this quadrant would present a poor and potentially dangerous Dian. I strongly request a designation of CG-F1, Commercial General for Parcel #51. r Very truly yours, 1 WiLLIAM LANDIS WL/ls I �� 1� No• SI • -gam LIEBHERR - ANDERSSON `HSO 17066 PALMDALE STREET AA 7 Coc�v�,L HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Q,2647 'z, G �v«. R ,M FEBRUARY 1 , 1996 P . MR . BR I AN JAMES t E t' U `J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA. 92648 DEAR BRIAN : IN OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION LAST WEEK , YOU APPRAISED ME OF THE FACT THAT THE 8" X 11 " COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS OF VARIOUS HOUSES IN THE GOTHARD-PALMDALE-WARNER-CEDAR BLOCK HAD SOMEHOW BEEN MISPLACED OR LOST . TO REMEDY THIS PROBLEM WE ARE SUBMITTING A SECOND SET OF PHOTOGRAPHS . YOU ALSO ADVISED ME THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD APPROVED THE APPLICATION OF THE "HISTORICAL OVERLAY" TO THIS AREA . WE ARE MOST UPSET BY THIS DECISION ! WE CONSIDER THIS TO BE CAPRIOUS AND SHORT-SIGHTED. TO INCLUDE PALMDALE STREET , WHICH CONTAINS NO HISTORICAL STRUCTURES , IN A HISTORICAL OVERLAY , JUST DOESN ' T MAKE GOOD COMMON SENSE ) IT IS A CLASSICAL EXAMPLE OF APPLYING A "BROAD BRUSH" APPROACH TO A VERY LOCALIZED PROBLEM. A FURTHER POINT I WOULD LIKE CLARIFIED IS YOUR STATEMENT "THAT EVEN IF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL DOES APPROVE THE HISTORICAL OVERLAY , IT WOULD HAVE NO ADVERSE IMPACT UPON OUR ABILITY TO DEVELOP OUR PROPERTY AT A LATER DATE , DUE TO THE FACT THAT PALMDALE STREET HAS INDUSTRIAL ZONING" . IS THIS INTERPRETATION CORRECT? WE APPRECIATE YOUR ASSISTANCE AND COOPERATION IN THIS MATTER . SI ERELY YOURS , ; WILLIAM E . ANDERSSON GENERAL PARTNER Dr► 3� �O� 25 .� �a��Q � 'S°o'�o�,A•���^ ^. �� .K• �� 1 _ °P�i r9�'1��+q Y 7 ��"a. �8 0 •oA�'J.r� I�A7. 0^ '8 a yNu 4 n I _.. yyo p9 113'. a � u• �� r�n l o a'° C� � o •� o ti 9' � i .. ��0 °a (lac )° '� 8'1° &'�e°„I!yu {��' yV p. °� IC „n8y v> ° o .o i Y (�'• toB��dN`> d ^�fin, e a o + ' �7pp t� ° `�n�e'•4°°,y�,j o,� ' ° � E daN:^ �1A" �f� ' ' i o�6 q'�y ° • 4 r^ �' n P4+ 'I g rp Q ;� ° JP,31 x .y7" � .• Bpe ,o° ono 9 Seb ° ..•e"° ° � ° o a9 �Mq ed .. •� .s Kam°� b� g'q..,a K >. . Epp _�. •'--'• �1-'� •�•° '.0 1I 8Da y ay 46 ITS . �.°e �---•.•_'_'.'_•_. _..--- --•- i q °: cam.°s m . O^ .a., ° '. :^v �: $ �, ^ � .� 1 �°oV n��L,K,NI ,,.•� v°Yuo ��V"a�p.e°, 8 �e o ,. Bg°�. �o ° •^�,r�fdd. ,�cffi v o "�°4a�ro ����b •gu z c.,p:. ;f(' (,�+ :'R P 0���8 r , ,.• .d o y„, ^ co�b r gg. o m P '° n., G� G^; 'V •° "�3}Y• � n� o p q{ 9a • ��1y,:Z• � t o r y. i � t� �� ��,,,�� s° Q•uo 'o ° ab ^ ., � yp � R~ f ���� ,���� � ,4 q ��n u'tlE '' �°Y' �$ I�'toR°. + ° �• pp,�, gg. y ;!" °� °fi°,YN � naa.v e { ^?Il4A1',F l irr!" ,M, e °'� n °,p °'}'k .,?u .PD�Y../ p.�n p q1�''•Y� Yp'7,! 0 .. ° .%...3 'I4.r..w1�°..+�rJM�4.•w..v"..rv. ib....«:wN7Y�MH...'M..•.n-..:.°.r�+.:rw•.i1Mr..aoacw...:...',WIiY.� �voa.iYa+:�33.,.•........,.-o,-a«....°w••--.......,..a.+s...-,...,ct.d.,a-....:.•.n,. �'� •?!!�,,r p �� .w2.ra vvr7ld.1. ,f• •' L� 7rr'n�i���f7 �, s11 � .• „.,, Isr;l, ,}+!f`�" Y,��1 `�.'�y :�'1' ,,y�4.�a y'kii�.�ri!'Ir �{.1 'a�f \ - •� '.���� i. •� '' f �, �� Z t��Vic`' .Y .r '�'t•a� � �:tC""•� �'' y,,..^% �:' 1}. •y"'�'/l•�w�1�• �"`l��"1{r.'•/?.A�La,'f{,1i.�.�0.yI I J _,_Y�1 �r''� �� a�+���y/�ir.�'} •c�t�J;`i' �ir, .�� _ I I 'I `I 1 _ ..i.•• � ♦i��', {t;�-Y�'�r�•�f�•.vTt• I �+�' � I i t I �'t " 1••' •�r �•n� __ _- ♦ ,r• Ir�ry'!��•ti=,��:11,^.?'II�.%'j a 1 ��il. �I� 1• + ��L,, �t•��..', kl j9r �4,�{ f��c'�r�y'�;;j •a��!�* ir�:� +;(..• • .,.fie'-' � � ;`��,I ,r 1' ri �t� i(�i�,� {�'�'7 i H jr� :�1 ""��►,.^.•. ���;,�~ •''�';Zr I I, ' r ,� y'1, i 7 ') II 7 'i. 'fl �'% I" :'fda h .r���::J.i� .��''-y 1 1 �,�yf ,:f `:r �I. I• I�1 i1,,1 ,'1' }r;�1i '•�,ff,� `` 1 � 'I .S'yHfii- ,./dj.„��' 'i� �'��'I I. � ` 'Y. p�'� 'I_. 1++.R! •�i�:r' 1) 1 I' • � .� �t?.��1•� �4���,T,"` ''f.M ' I •t� I{li .I I It}� •�{. i A' � •=.'/R�I�'rl w� 1 ;�+tjy�� i• '`a��k+n, .a�•`-..ryc�i 1� ,i �� F .1'rr,;. '. ��• .,•��,.•�,M�,+�`'•`•�•�T r ��.. 'WI;• •'7' ��,, 1 I�` �• 1 �� '�' �i. ,fJ'• ii� h •1•�.�.� �1'/. -�r ,�.;^,,�'.t,..i".Y''':�.. '� .v �:I� 2 ;i' 1' '� - f ,1"{.,*��• I yj�`� (,.'•�1_,;;� ;�, w�{ ..1.'��t'�r 4. �•:•�:�•-: ♦ J Sva':�'yY� I� I' Is' .i �� ,�'tl''>; '., I. I I:, -�I ( / ;!i i '' .'A• . /r•�. �}. 'f � :�s• �;'�,_...�.t�`"•'y� �♦ 1jJiii � 1.9I`I t-�''�. ' ' ,I1�1•', � „�''•�� (J��:• � •,, 1�� \��' �:i�, �'�•�� ���r,•�1� ��� ta),4 �, �?t''^.+""�!"r� .,'.' -�.. ry 1 1I' �i � 1 �� ::��1.: I. ��(� It�,,,� )�:aiL,li'�4♦;:}. !{��ah t ,� _ :i '� r "�'1 ,r�..�2���• !t('.. i ``Sn .�, I •` .r, �+,. - .11 � �.r/���)(1s1A��'\ �,��'��Vr� •, `' �i��Ali=±�� � 1��I' I I t';� , �, t��' -,i �( p�1�"yh�l.'i. :ra a.�'�'���M„}y,.,'�,�•�t I� V!.�,�. 1 tit wM� ,Irse. t L�fr aim,fwri.) .� 4 L"\I* ).�• •� ... •'1J +t �,` �" , � Ity� :�� i1 ;•i%�`1ti �1 i �{.. .: \����7 �:�1'a.V�t/. 1 '�'' _ ��..��r�tjy 4 „ 11!;. ji�P���'' I �°C �iy �r � � } ��75;''{�, f {:f: f �[�'� .�• �a��:i ►a. }+4'1 1, sIV yj dwAk �► i Mr�' �� i. 1._!:. ,,, 'I'd J.�A � 1 \ 1 4yj �`f1' .ti•✓l Q: `jl �{�V��� •� ,,�! �'�' •c• � !'.r�;� :.a F,'~t)�'i?''-�..' •'7^. '" :►/ :.,:�� .��! M I '1•t/N '� 1 • .J,I�.�a + •,�I r '. :•• •t�^.:.^4•R►4Nr1.�• '-w.����rt/! • .��� -;,\ '�.%��!•''�'' �tw ►. ''fir '� �t' M1 4`j+.'R i1i MIi •• N,j�i� I^, i •�I �����-� a�1 �, �`I..� f\'C�1. ^•.• '�� •ti -,:��, .�' r, '� .:�'''r. .tt A_r_+:` t+%) �,^I;.. 111.e .�"�" j ':i� _ , � ,:1 iJ 1��' '� Via,•.!. i�.t.I +_ a.-- t ';�_ �.:• '.�i,�.l '�,.K M'�y, n ,�,y a'^`'� •V p ;: �! t. J ♦,,F I �.�/• ,�j;,1i•,��ytf"fti:7.•�A,,1�,�\'� !�!��" •) _n �' a Ju"W 'a ._f""• :':1� 8�',Ir• '1 r . `�' �:l�'�''S , '.L Ir'. •Phi -�;/%'r. t�. ,7 !'• •' �• ���4X .'!iTr (1I�n''?►TJIRJ �►J`1 •� .c��'�. rr. �, .jiv: IPa� rv'Fi c. �:` .1•• , r�•►�:X"! •r \;t.,�. •r�` 1 •�� 1i1, ♦ 1��r t r•' f•4.. r 1 :c .. !,�/ 1..: .. r'' ,a fir.. 'Ilf '\ ', '( � ' .��•'.G' Ib''�_ 1j.�/'����'r��,,.�"•f r- n;'rt�t�. 1 Lt�,l ��''•�!I'11"t��,�'e 9'� �.. 4/,`�.'�y. rt; ,^�• a �'; ,fr• '1 t• r' ,,_��`5���1��+,., ;�I;r,}�.V iir'�(\lu. •:��/l. ,},'+1�� �a.� "$1' � �1'1 •fit �, : ,'ti .�`� ,�'S ti ,y'-'' �•, i �,s '•: ._(� 4 .,r• y R �' j •t .j R n, i 'IA.• .1!i�w Id)r �jj�j�.••• .�. i'. ,1't.CMitt +' •'r t ♦ •,' ,1 •C •'41' .. 'r� !/I4'i! ��k• - «i.��. I;�i 1 i, ;1:. �,. i I ✓� ,p=`�'' �1'' Z.a � AZP' A.'INK. ;14 �-4 14 Q 71.0", 1 71 iy Im rill- zi t.-:4 P!�- ol it• g, W" '41; 1 V Of il -t 1 iei-4 IIJI I82 Y It! 4p qr.o 'R ,fit- ?17;p Ir tv.! • pf �l P1131i:1., "bAr 7-r JI: TO. �y , A7 a$ �1l. J. I • )I 611Ea4 t it ?4, - t ' ` "v 'i', I i' - t.i dr O( •'�' !��d4�).' r,� it " �'I.1r'�'4 �:,,y; l•�; S i , � t$ I 1 U '� 1+1``,,1 , i 1' r 1 �IJ"'� jr',. .�'pir:.. :'. .... £ � , .!>, r: ,w�`.,,�..F1t � } I1' E o-1,1 JfJ ' j riJ rt 1• A 1 .p � 9 �{ fJK'r�r, ,t ,����� �` ����'�! �1�#5Y����� ,, 2r� ' �i!_1`'4I 11 { ��'? 11f , {`�,)it` ����tf jr'! I I}tlf� .r�'+' al'. t`•!��;� y . ,�I i(�!�.Oi �'� (t t'I t{�a)��1(. 1.��'• {�l I? I �p� '�{..i �Jt,l:, '{!�) 1 1 �. ;� � �; � :.�-�Y, a1(:111,11 I tJ.•I..d I .1R(�3.i'. tf!, f l 'ia�� �j�::1, ,:'jT �k,. I�' ®Y"r yr: ::j Y;�(•• �,�.::'��� � `� 4, t f .yi1 i�{{l, !�,•�;;1, �!' :1�'f'i:�i `I .,J� � .•, �1{ i�t'r{,l; � '^hiiI f; I} 1., 5� ^^����.^({i� �.t I I !_' ;! ,, 1 I� },I. ! tl, .t �t l4 ;'! !t t{� `•1!1 l) ! I t r r{ � , � .�'�':�`i, �t I � ' •ra' � 'J��i IA�� !�:�i' �� �� �'J {. �i i� 1{'.i} ! }�' 1 E � I�I I t.` � 1 J'�." �F t••(�, J 1+ �r{ �. ;►, t r i ��.I . ' /rtN'd!:'�'�� +� .l,s�1J�� .F' ��{>•}i'� 1 i f ! s :f' �+'� )47 i �, i',��j, �'e' -i i> !) i�l Y !•�. � , + �,. 11 ter':: . . I ;�!!•• fi��it�;,I:'t''��,�`I('e1;' •;f.d{r;•{! t p ' {yfrtl,j� t_:'. °� � f � :;i�). } �'< i. �r:i: !,, .. / '; �:�. ,�r._•�, r ..f;t'1�• lit',' :i i } 17�i I'1 1i ;:i1° f,s' ' �'1 I I r :•�If }f t�y;= .r' n:,a.. ' j'. S" � 1•,. , i ):1�v11. 'i,�J�1 R)��:�Pr16 I l,S ��� '. (,• + i :�4� + t1 J• i .J. ,.J of;' _ '' �,.y/YyI;.� I.t+a ?"rr•.if{.p!!`f) {.I '{)rI ,}:.r ii,{i. Y- IY�()*+,! {� J !i.th��) ( CI �{"�'� f .� . rT.l'�,41!,' •',,•.',,.�i,�i''{�'±,',t 1�' i'f �!.1�'�'�r# y'(�� Vr '�)'•#t1,I}. �( I�;';i {�le ,k4 1 E ( �i 1. 1: •'' t. �� �i ttd,; .i ,,,3n. ,, dtS.��. r U � 1.' „ I''�.i�'I ) ,( � t a 1 �'!�• a ').,:k j! .1. r i , '', +•,, 97t Yr l�lfnlri„1'J� ,s, r.,h.,i.�ilaa f - ,•! �!''t ir' �. , ,t f`' �' ;�i�y ltya''c{;t1 1 -f•r«. �,',!: �i.fpr %� >F•^„ p r y,�; ', ;�, ,r ry v�-, i''+•.,?'' nt- .), .I ` 'a4.,� ►lL:Jr' 1' ['�• 11;`A"+. + !t, i}� e I • i' t'I{ y'ty 1+1 ,tb, !' 1ti 6 ,. t' 4 1�1 Ifi��ff (j{¢� •il -f!' {�.41 . (I ����i �1,v ,tiG,lnn-.• it, ,a:,r� :.I t r' • �� • ✓t V I� `` i',tlj i11!J ( ', r i .{ \ :.u. �l7!Ju:}x'{�.tairD,I� t f i �': .�,/, : .Ir. r�_ A �r-1 � ,{� 17 (�,: '1'} �'!.I,�I�; ),c a{,• j�')� r,1.1:! {t''•.i:.J{,4;fy`I y�,..y11(�1- , ..1, l,, r. � -' A-�' li �:: 4:,�i� ), I'.!�!Pp;�;'�,:r„.{. f `a, '(..{) .:,-.v:l, t 1...,• :r %{ t i't h , r� i �'• •�1:�:,h 1' ll , ,+ ;,It,•.I 1, :11 1f),� ena t4. ,I't•i,. ;i'I, :{t t i. 'i r roa:.:wG�2ti.`'i: !!r. •I i ,i•:. t N•1,i #..,{� !.' i '�;%q +,: a4 r f•, l�,.-, F,• (( }. t.;. •;J,, .N. {,S, � - - �, 'j' /J(�,]� ( F'I' iS .t• � F�f {� >qa��6" i'�,I`^ '',I It tt t, 'Y^t•+:h iS! t'',4•.l J�f a:[f�:,' )i(i}, �r Ott I.'� .. i'lR �`f..�rf:.7 'I:. � ,. r�:1,,",i Iet,I: ��,.;�jJ'`k{ l".,ti +'.�1. •�,';,)Ey,J�o9'�,� q,..} +``1 v,F.)t t, j .d.-,. '1��'Il�:i,I{+.,)P i...., 'I ,. •>.' •:'J: � �f I{�'.��.:"I ,!.6117.{ 'r{.r�(, !t ..k t. .•,.t�) 4�- r{ t &! �+I��" t)�-`�, t; '+ .i ' {tiF;+f i ' ,;•� !�•' J 1..•�'i.'� '�h )i ( .�y�! ;�;y�ly Ibc,ht,�1, �I:;,jl ul I;j, 1,y,f4; ttt �,°rid .p:,�T y {�,�•.� s ,�o.a .• .. rl) :! '�j•1�.�:J +,11 r�1,�.l, .�t11'•ti t• 'fI,P•�ril� { t i r�i)! !'t{ '>3`J' ). ' it:'!1 )'I ' �.I {' t�'J !) j �'.�i '- I ,,. A �',,. •: r i)t.4 p•f•)�1++ tt1 r :� 'i `I' {,i .fti � '' iIi).. ;a,�13' (,'In' ) „ ;j' ,l}t), i.t !t !.I�. 't I j °',f. , S 1�;',.'i}. { �t �:i� I •ir' {1 i r'..tt t' °I ,� 1.` /,,�' ;i r ).' k ».� ,d1 1 r y, j',•, .� 1. 4 I ,, {i,!' {+,}t,ti l f •t, .f' r ;s , .y ' 1�J �' ,� f' �� , 4. lt,v),I r gip•; 1� V}4 j� i, .? ,�;�;'�, �� �� �i r')!y, J '.t!�.'.{J,+,;l j�!�If, `:Il. •�C1�` ;,:.�:;' , ..a. tii ,r• I � '�,••�.. ;� 't -;(£, .�Ir„ f: .�I•tl{i}1! ;i,i:l y�1, .}1i .i, .}�!i ,.It....1. ..! ,`.. {�{a +.1,'r.. :tl+E'. ,4�f t,tlt �•'1, .. -�' {. 5•.� E1 �i '%� i! a �,{�;,,�i').';! 1(.JI,�.)1ttI iiii•{ ',ns( 'f`: 1I'�.,•• ,t. {' 31f3 s .'f j,� i. L'• V t 1( •IE.1_tt I ',f 1 I . ,1 ��'•� � `'Z., rt { !,�V, ij{It i �;Il1t 1.'�I'?' tt:•.! ,l.�,If 1 , {-f.e { {i) ,� P -A! ,1yy a y i�t� ,t I)li •'y 1.�S 1�. � •}., {J' _-��J1 't ' )" , j ''�)'�Li h' R!{, (li!{" t..•�{ III l}t, � t1 r t k d,,, �.t Jr,,l { �' tl{ '�; � • •••,� - '1� �.'sl {t 1 !j,:! { t li '',J. i' 'i I )J ')II 'ii { t,l{• t f''at 1 ,( ,: 11i ,rt i �•�-% t . '.,• r,,.. .I�ts�.l i$•��r ��1.l,.t � t f„ � S� t r. ,It,�,t,� 4(.: t 1 , �:.:.-•+.:'. ,� , ) ''L>') •IV' `^ .7: {it .� �l,iff}i rf �f[It's''If 1 ! fi if ,iF' �' ## is 11 tl�{t'; !t ( 9• ,1 j J I� 1 • ' 4; �(. ,' `.., )i' 1 ;rf1 'l(y`i�: I .'. I' )r'1'{•41� +'�' J i•,!+3.iY 11 ,. {t + �. (,. r ,IJ1) I. ,l�,; , ,,),�, a, +, ,, tl �, ,f+ ,.�'II ! •t:1 ,- ;:Ir. I•r'�,•i'1, ('{ « , .. 5 1 . - ' '"Ir I.iii,l r�:II,. J{6 �1., ..�:" Ali ,1' r}� ti+I rr l6- i 'i�j,., CIti �,t ''" }•�.' � ,3 .jf J�+. i, {�!t(} �. R'�� I�J���ii'1{.bl �� I����,L,l:.:r� I) � �',S1A•p�'�T��, ..• "I n t � � ��� a t - t .. , i ,I';Jr1� ,� �`,y�!� .Y .x. r{p�'r�'��'rr;�,.,f• •� ;4.r•� 1 ,itt ,;%-.i.,l(, 1��. r. f 7 'i ''"iy!i. .jn."�iy� � f', •,�.:Yi,,.'t•�. ''� ''•� ,, 11r 1itt� +Jdtl�{•. Ilr i. Y, .1i f'.,: 1 t1 a r r/ .��.• ., ��.. +�`" r. J•I•{,! ��IAK� �' ;i ;t�s'.�. ! ).'tS!^ !� ,I •��; , 1, �) I :�'j � � .;♦ aa. 7 •' f. •~'•S• �`�'r.jT J:'Z`+�'' R J3 / 11• )�j+. ,� 1 1�,; f S?, •d1. 1 {� ( r.. 1'� r'w.`''?'i� r F ''•rah it �..F"`.rf.� r�t 5"ri •• ``' ! .�:��,,���`�tr ��� , ,t"-P ~{Y„ ''♦ r.,`ra .1✓ ft,) t4 +I;.11,,{ t. �i�.,• AI i1.�,��,. y�if f S.r' !' /,�.. f•ir{J�;,.!'' !+}r- a..lj. eL.i...rs. ti't•.� r -•,.w-`'vw�S'►r M!!"L�,; �v. _ .I. f p�.�•.'�ii'✓' 4�,�..t � �. '�.4 G( 1�,�te' -ids{'1){ r�,i'J�'j'1) } � „t," • i t 'i�. fr � }i�1fl� '�t�r�'+.�}�,� t :T:�j J,r�riy'M~f'Ary:t i1+�7'�:�ryh: . •;�� 'b,�i .,./ sir'+., //,.�..�.�.y;,ti. ,'+t 1.1 . ♦I ,1�;',[ 11 r,l�)'1 +��'.t{` �'tf rf± crl�IrM.y ,r r �y'•;•'•!^, � ,rh.y... '1.� ,.l+w ,ti?Kyyr ,`tom wk. ♦r'��,�,a 'i t;6 ;� 1! i.i`! 1 -�rl t I � I} �, ,�, 41 ;.•I Hs lr,..� ��� �.'1!'�R� �i'•�'tRif..,}1�n'. t.•� - .wegi�„ 'VJ�, r r �f Ji� if j'F. .y t 1 1 "i,i"[• }',�1^ -I'�r�t ,t i h :,f i, ,,'i S'�'.�f, r( .1„�{�+ ! ,�,`1, *"f�!'��,w..:.•� :•,. �. � r( {) �r,�.�!h9ji,r�r J Ir1.',i:r��, •j" )yy).++i,l t'i,:, 5:��ppf r�if ) r � '�S;�-v- 1 �+ij; i �'I ..T_� :jr`v;ti:'!;���� . ..ti-`,.�i::2s. ''swA� � t' } rtLj,�;1• fn s! r:?}, M �'j i•i.r.rrvytr.,d t. I A,!? it ,;,.+ -}»1 '•1 fw!.� .� •jr.: ". !�+tr;;J!..:+ � •• �..,.;.at.. +.ay, '+� s [ a '}! .+,. ,l,1 �.f .�(. ti) .}tp1 ,`t..,3r,f•! .l;t) t .�,i t:"` { ;1:r•''i t -.,�_ N. = :,`•::�::ry •.,tG''tK`3µal. 'w.' t • � A {.-t�t y.,�,Itla `1j4 x�� r.�J -J Jr:•,a I�f11 •I.t 1 IV. 1'1•�{I{ 'S�tN�11' rl { i�It,1+1. 1 - •� f •�5. 1 �i • .Y '�• rJ �kt� 7 l t r.,�`• (• t r R fl J! {{/•,' � 'l 1 4 f • � ,, �. �� .;ti ,IAt!? ,r'1 'r r t , ,J I Yi ��: �,�� !j} .Yt ` '•-th , � "'• �• �• 1�r1:� lJ r. S.1.1 b� 1 w� • ( E, 1• 1.. 'tt ' •1 r1t '�,,( 'J, r't>", f? ,' ('1r r�d3, ti• i ` I y t. 1 ! '�,�'ly�. •` h{. r, !,t�,•• �'`rl ril• ,1,3 ilt1 +rr} I.A,.. li 't "( )I }r > _y . !""ry '1•r ) �fJ ��Af:11�1�i �'i!r'•)r ) )•( !�,• S�IJ{lhlr ty '. a r, °'r ` •�'•rti ♦ � '!!•!! � :!'�t...{"'i:rr^r'i'L� 'J�3�11 ,i4} r r•r l�''• •� 1 I r ,. -'•!• �'�.••. i�L ,� use�- y '' i ,e rCY i� '•J '' I°' c C 5 ' '` - + � +;•,r1 fit;,• ;1�Y�rJ j�laY�i,*/t�'� *:r�• • t ,l 111 " I.' ' ' tf I "(" r I rl t+l i r S 1, :e 7. , - r ,�Iif( ,1 ::1 ,,�Ir, + ' + ,E1 : t'� {s,; I ( ,►t +; ,ill I J - � � .•��{ t" I IJ( ( I II";�I' +I, ,-I. I�.Il.l I 't � t_ I .i�-_I"' I i- l {" -� 'I .. I{I 1i' .. r, `,i'j'I � II I•j < �1(C �V,t ti'1-,.{{,�(. I „I•I: 1 I •:11 1 ".-( �!i "I ':�I ,,I�5.,-,f - +I'.I" ,I r-: r • !t � I ' I.3 -F:(II ,.::�%�'!", i:` 61, ,j L.II'f�r l'I-II ,.I. (.i .t ;1, �1. ,�.�.,_{ kid -r I I I11 {,� .IL:IM•p i f(I S --1 r•1. `'•,�;i,l 1I ..{' .( 1: I �•tl I(f.- l r,�� 11 r L-I i � ,1-; �:.`Z�`_ � "�;,.'. �' _ (�JI1 - 1�,4�-(II;• 1, I I _ t''.7 "1 \ .. — .. 1} (111 S I. I 11 S .. III I�; ""��-+b I,',i• 1 tt. ( II �. I j (1't l,:'{ ".i: 1 ," I �"> Ass, G 1 v.... ...�''••--•"' •�'ggg 1:,1,= •_, it �•'I'�-�{ Ij {I•"1� 11i ;i` ��"'�—l.� :'I °,i I i'lr...f�- + S r�•,J ,. c + ''(I�'rl r 1 II , i l� I � i' 1 v# I.,: 1� � i lIS�I I- l { _{ I� ``�`` �L .J,;irs�'}'`r�•""'' I" l r � f 1� 1 • "� ,�i,;lil I p 1{ i1(� ! i I li it • ''�' , L113({1I I.I I'I4l •`I' , ( I '.;.. 2 I ,ff r r 11 �' �" III' , I 1 it � `tS { �1(I�i{ 11 � II i ; t' Irk i.''i:_ ii • ' t III L i iiIff tl i { ' �t I I1I It I' I r I ) I' •'� �•' ,`11I1� I rr 1 �t IMP PM L? r` } °^���• I?I IIII I 4 (I, ' r' .-} 'I . }T! r*.yk'�,�•";t I i _ _ � � , i /'. ` ,t._f.ri 1. 1.1,- , S .�.� ,t:3 !�TTOi.T •y7�!5��y..- r1•��t� t.r7. (t 1-- . s" 1- - Yw�14JJ 7Ld'•?� 'r '�.�'If � �{jt..!' L.+Nr- "tLrl .1....+ '1,.i�i' - � ".: _'- a G r tr r, e� t 1 - II• ,. 11010 rb. �t Ptt Q�' l�4TJi t% `. r.1' 14 f - ly tLS - �t�+3 :U. 1 , �� ,t�•T I .try}., :)Mi.qq(S` `t r'�� _�._;�� {rt It.aS �.1 � � YY�,•. F.r � rY ';! � I r ft,j a. ��� -.•� ' r�.Z4�}`L t; v�t _ -�fl'�iyy'�'"'•4.r.i�gr �r41r y' 1 t. r ' ,r! I -{ ( r I P 1t r n + :¢ 1�_.. l ra 7 : f j� -u 1,e . r / 1 ' �t i�{u�l'}t( frl I.l { III• I', "I ( t I III , ' I � III i t ✓ {7 jy r , ) r I " � '� / t a .Ir {f}1 J 'rS�t,,•�r.'•. '{ ifil{ �, r:( ' {' Ili fl r{ _tl�;t 1 Y :I ,I - - • I. r FN I '•"} + It:l{` I III ,I �, III , If�. Ili lii I+ �r•(� .;ill III " i , }I :� �fl{._, • rt t _•1111�I I �I I If+ I' I - ,S� !-l 1,..-.i,l� ��, I I;.. 7! l ,1111,.. �. I ,,l � I , I I I I I ,I ' �i,►w '� � { , `` �I'1, , � ,.:',i i4 .',I� ,.LII',. tl .I ",�;i ri11�'• I j 1� � .I Ill,Il,(; i - � _ - { .ji III ti' I � ✓t+I1jf�:,1 J 1 ' I` f. 1 I I ?I + tl ;ir I �'. � I I;; ,� I l i,. I 1 J 1 1 I f I I� �t r•:�...•� 1; , i� III" i I ... � 1 � S 11„y,,��iW7t ;Iw ` � , 4t! I I I � . . `:y',rY��..w ..• .. PwIn �. G7e1RR11R'ifA 1 +� H71CW 11�fK�� I I Alfa �n f:Wgra nl. v �� r `'� tl 7�7I I,:S I� Ilt .il { (•I � ;(� I��CK� 'I',�� .111 rk(II l'It{�1�T�'�1�� d�j(( rr 1�' :.r.�r f �,� t J 1 1 �� IV.I"� � II �.r r .,f� N� + 1 � �S -.I.w Y - t �' • y t 1` tlkJ:�!'' I ( �{1'••t aD!' ct,'il�,il 11"11�71 I�1�F1: ((t±± n .p n.�r nee....... .11�'cr- .fat. •,—i'^� f r ®r.- i.0 SfpL ' r ti « r � s 1 t 1 I r tr i ,t 1 1 Ifj ` f"J' Y -t�.': 1 R ,!�`' •'�;, .;11, 1;,,l. A�i' Y ,. it �rII,..I •;�•• f'ir.•I• I,' .,+P' 1 ..1 � 11, {• '.I a. ,1: {_ I,(,, l i. �. +. .y., r .,f( ., i .-��, •F� 'l, ;, 't.. .1•�l'�.!. ,'r.:j�.� t�Ir' :, � � I.}1 { '1; i �: j. ,r: �4iiy l i I I i l t , y' r ('��!S 7' � i I + l! j I J. _ II, III 'I I I 1 ' ,� '�■•�� '-=��- � ��s�-...`,. + ,•.L,III t� I';I.: ( I-,- .IIII I -I + �'+ +�� .I ' + �.! „tlltl r I(I 1 t (`�I������- •� �- ::, + r 1 r II t r t I , t ( , I r , f � IJ! � t•. !.. `_ �` J - 1"tL S ,tl J:( �,�w y � ! 4- l I i 1 I {} 7 ' - I � '1 ".%I ` t��r�p.♦ ~�+'�.,",, �,�a '(a.�'. ,It;c:.•f't I(11 r ^{ 1 1 I {I.1' � , I: � II - �:�11.4),J���'�• �?��• r(t -, I.) ,I ! 1�r1 ; -. .I !I ,il '({I Ili It Ali11�� C�fd�a•'-.i`%`FIA1 d. I ' ' I fl.; (�_• � " rX f�`� � 'i+l! Ih St'J`�,t ;'1�r(.�J`' I I .•� L- (!1I -I I I r 1 I ' t. �+ I i II,1 �') � I III r !j�lt t I it,� �Iq�I,-.,' R'.�.t' w �_' ,. '.l I Lt�.ltt�,'Jt��Dlt7 6 �` I 7 '• y-t• , �- �' �'I J1 1-- ' I 71 I i 'f I ' I '.art-A�d!!i' ��t •'. 'I I ' i, I - - yf74 �I ( �� t� jl 11 i .� ' f;R � � {fit •._" 'Li'�r'•a�:tvtYi����!!' t 'f _ '! ._, i I � I � � -, I. ,1 J I � �'^I , �.a , i p•'.' r �-'- tEt�i S �J1ML7►i i4�.a4t+i� '1�+� �. �4 l( I t ? +�.111''✓✓ ��yq,�}t, p ��Lx,' 1 ��J r l�lr r"°•:��+ 11,,11 ' .�; .I I �r/ (r ,:, t - �I t• - r+ - 'I .{I' 'I �.\,Jl '.[ I-,;(- , i .`1f,� ;4'll ;. I II ' `',1��'�t, ' 't ,I '�•(„ , �;'. �,__ - W so ',� .�•� t•t�,�;�Jq, � i Y T , , i .' -iy; r t{ { :.. ,I. t 1� ,(1t ' �{I II ;,,- �`hY� 44..,1 7 ... �, , \. �.�� I�. ! i .zJ_• '-I �„ , L- I ',t' !I -t.' ' �1t• ' 1 "t :v r �/ .I�y++��"•• - _ - �..r.w±a':7 _- _ r f `• ,� ��,6 + ' �, � I ,',III + �i -�!i I.J. i .,t !• tr�+r � rr hii t y 1 t4 1. 1 I �1 hiyll .. }. 1 • 1 j I� v 'r it S:: ': i 7 r } I I:'--� /� ,, i.. :.i •t� � 1 r. �� rf .I � _)-' E IiJ-'_�� r i i.ri II!_r� ,l"'• 1: ..ty:l-. ; i!-�� Irl'I •�•� p'' �,' f � i} •Iti i. I i ..1. (. is•.j. li i �t' I li f.,-J 1. � -1 1 :1 �ri 1., I r ! �.i � .a -�..� !1 (t 1�!' � f .�!,' r .i ' .. -.1 - i-1 i.ia II'i a f�;:l I t �' Itl 11:' 1 T ti ;?{} '!! rt't��.- <fl i Yi{t 'fi � � � -P i• �ti. r - -1�y •A�i r +, 1r. .�" } � rr, t�� r� fIf11' t �,.i � � y r+ 1� -•) n. t•tt{�• �F yy ��}�` �If , fit.�• � ,; _ !`, f •j': r t• .trr,..Oopv— I ATTACHMENT 7 RESOLUTION NO. 1509 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 94-1 FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2 WHEREAS; on January, 1992 an application was submitted, requesting a General Plan Amendment for the Update of the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach-, and WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared to address the environmental effects, mitigation measures, and project alternatives associated with the proposed Update of the General Plan for the City of Huntington Beach, and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines (hereafter Guidelines), and City environmental procedures; and WHEREAS, written and oral comments on the EIR were received from the public and responsible public agencies during and after the review period; and WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission conducted public hearings to receive public testimony with respect to the Draft ETA; and WHEREAS, such comments and testimony were responded to through a Response to Comments document and said document was made available in a manner prescribed by CEQA and the Guidelines; and WHEREAS, Public Resources Code 21092.5(a) requires that the City of Huntington Beach provide a written proposed response to any public agency that commented on the EK and the Response to Comments included in the Final EIR satisfy this provision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed all environmental documentation comprising the EM, including all elements of the Final EIR, and has found that the EIR considers all environmental effects of the proposed Update of the General Plan, is complete and adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA and the Guidelines; and WHEREAS, Section 15092 of CEQA Guidelines provides that the City shall not decide to approve or carry out a project for which an IER was prepared unless it has (A) Eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible as shown in the findings under Section 15091 of the CEQA guidelines, and ln:g;eirreso.doc 7I�, 7 (B) Determined that any remaining significant effects on the environment found to be unavoidable under Section 15091 are acceptable due to overriding concerns as described in Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, Section 15093(a) of the Guidelines requires the City to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission recommends certification of the Final EIR as complete and adequate in that it addresses all environmental effects of the proposed Update of the General Plan and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA and the Guidelines. The Final EIR will be composed of the following elements: a. Draft EIR and Technical Appendices b. Planning Commission and City Council staff reports C. Planning Commission and City Council Minutes d. Comments received on Draft EIR and responses to those comments All of the above information has been and will be on file with the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648 and with the Secretary of the Commission. SECTION' 2: The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR has identified all significant environmental effects of the project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. SECTION 3: The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR has described all reasonable alternatives to the project that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the project (including the "no- project" alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of project objectives and might be more costly. Further, this Commission finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR and all reasonable alternatives were considered in the review process of the Final EIR and ultimate decisions on the project. SECTION 4: The Planning Commission further finds that the benefits gained by the City and its current and future residents by virtue of implementing the goals and policies of the proposed General Plan, override the unmitigatable effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report 94-1, and the attached Statement of Overriding Considerations (Exhibit A) SECTION 5: The Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby recommend to the City Council adoption of Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting held on the twelveth day of December; 1995. AYES: Holden, Livengood, Biddle, Kerins, Tillotson, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Gorman ABSTAIN: None ATVdZ=eleffs cretary tannin ommisston Chairperson Attachment: Exhibit A e EXHIBIT "A" ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 94-1 SUMMARY OF/AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS In order to make a decision whether to approve a project that will have an adverse environmental impact, the benefits of the proposed project must be balanced against its unavoidable, significant adverse impacts. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered acceptable (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15493 (a)). Benefits from a project are defined as those improvements or gains to the community that would not occur without the proposed project. The benefits from adopting the General Plan are preliminary based on the higher quality community environment that will exist as the City develops under the new Plan. This EIR has identified that the General Plan would result in significant unavoidable adverse impacts for three environmental issue areas, regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures. These environmental issue areas are: Transportation/Circulation, Air Quality, and Noise. Therefore, the City of HB must make a Statement of Overriding Considerations in order to adopt the General Plan. Transportation/Circulation Policy LU 2.1.2 requires that the type, amount, and location of development be correlated with the provision of adequate supporting infrastructure and public services. This policy should ensure that implementation of the Circulation Plan, the TDM/TSM strategies and the proposed mitigation measures described in the EIR would occur and thus the potential impacts of the General Plan buildout can be avoided in most cases. However, there are no feasible roadway improvements that can reduce significant impacts along Pacific Coast Highway from north of Beach Boulevard to south of Brookhurst Street. Furthermore, because Pacific Coast Highway is a regional transportation route as well as attractive to tourist travel; the proposed TDM/TSM strategies and transit policies may not be effective enough in this location so as to completely mitigate the significant impact along the identified roadway segment. Furthermore, the indirect land use impacts associated with re-classification of certain roadway segments would be unavoidable. Therefore, the traffic impacts of the General Plan are considered to be significant and unavoidable (Class I), requiring a Statement of Overriding Considerations to adopt the General Plan. 1mg;eirsoc.doc 1 Air Quality The level of development permitted under the General Plan would inevitably result in an increase in emissions concentrations which already exceed State and Federal standards. Although implementation of the General Plan's air quality element would serve to minimize this increase, the presence of CO (carbon monoxide) hotspots at busy traffic intersections may never be fully mitigated. Consequently, air quality impacts are considered to be significant and unavoidable (Class I), requiring a Statement of Overriding Considerations to adopt the General Plan. Noise With implementation of the General Plan, an inevitable increase in ambient noise levels would occur. The General Plan includes policies and programs which, if implemented, would minimize the increase to the greatest extent possible. However, the effectiveness of certain policies may be limited, particularly those relating to retrofitting of existing uses to protect against future noise increases. Because existing uses may not be fully protected from future ambient noise levels, the noise impacts of the General Plan are considered to be potentially significant and unavoidable (Class I), requiring a Statement of Overriding Considerations to adopt the General Plan. As previously noted, in order to make a decision whether to approve a project that will have an adverse environmental impact, the benefits of the proposed project must be balanced against its unavoidable; significant adverse impacts. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered acceptable (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15093 (a)). The sections below briefly describe the most important benefits identified as a result of adopting the General Plan as proposed. 1. The proposed project will benefit the City and its residents and will outweigh the significant adverse environmental effects which remain after the project's mitigation measures are implemented. 2. The General Plan requires the preparation of a comprehensive historic resources survey and a preservation ordinance that will help to preserve historic and archaeological resources. Retention and protection of the City's early built environment will create a recognizable identity and a source of community pride. 3. The General Plan requires the preparation of a public art ordinance and a cultural master plan that will encourage public and private sector involvement and promote cultural projects and activities throughout the city. 1n:g;eirsoc.doc 2 4. The General Plan provides for the development of a variety of housing types to meet the needs of all segments of society by establishing programs for the provision of affordable housing, the preservation and improvement of existing housing, and a provision for the development of housing for people with special needs. 5. The General Plan provides for the linkage of new development with available and expanded infrastructure and services including streets, transit, sewers, water, storm drainage, energy, and communication. The timing of development will be phased with the provision of necessary infrastructure/service improvements. b. The Circulation Element of the General Plan provides policies and programs designed to provide a transportation network with adequate capacity to accommodate proposed buildout, including mechanisms to monitor and maintain acceptable traffic conditions. 7. The General Plan will ease the potential effects of traffic, equipment, construction and other noise sources through policies that require the installation of mitigation measures of many different means to ensure that noise levels are maintained within City noise standards. 8. The General Plan requires the preparation of a Geological Hazards Ordinance which will ensure that critical or sensitive facilities or high occupancy facilities will not be allowed to locate within a certain predetermined distance from an active or potentially active fault. 9. The General Plan contributes to the health and safety of the residents of the City by providing city-wide programs for disaster preparedness and recovery planning in the event of a major earthquake, fire, flood or other disaster. 10. The General Plan provides for the completion of surveys that will identify and map the existing environmental resources within the city which will aide in the review and approval of future development projects and the preservation of significant resources pursuant to the standards set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 11. The General Plan provides programs emphasizing proper management of hazardous materials, siting of facilities, and effectiveness of emergency response in order to protect the residents of Huntington Beach and the environment from damages resulting from improper handling or storage of hazardous materials. ln:g;eirsoc.doc 3 12. The General Plan will improve the quality of life for the residents of Huntington Beach through implementation of the policies pertaining to upgrading police and fire services, civic institutions and cultural facilities, library services, education and their interrelationship with the other elements of the Plan. This City will become a safer and more desirable place for families and individuals to reside and will provide families and individuals increased opportunities to further their participation in civic, cultural and educational events. 13. The General Plan requires the implementation of comprehensive streetscape improvement plans that will specifj all potential improvements for projects within the public rights-of-way, including design concepts and design criteria for median and parkway landscape, sidewalk elements inlcuding street furniture, and public signage, including gateway entry identification signage which will 'help to establish and strengthen community identity. 14. The General Plan requires the approval of an Economic Development Strategy, Edinger Corridor Study and an Economic Opportunities and Constraints Study to set forth goals and policies for improving the fiscal stability of the City and to provide for economic opportunites for the City's residents, business retention and expansion, and marketing of the positive aspects of Huntington Beach. The City of Huntington Beach finds that the unavoidable risks of this project are acceptable when balanced against the benefits of this project for the reasons setforlh above. ln:g;eirsoc.doc 4 ATTACHMENT 8 RESOLUTION NO. 1510 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO 94-2 WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 has been prepared and analyzed in the Planning Commission Staff Reports dated July 18 and 25, August 8 and 22, September 12 and 26, October 10 and 24, November 14 and 28, and December 12, 1995; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 is a request to provide a comprehensive update citywide of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan and to revise pertinent maps in regard to General Plan Land Use designations in the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held eleven public hearings pursuant to Government Code Section 65353 as noted above, to consider said General Plan Amendment for the comprehensive update of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is required to make a recommendation to the City Council on the amendment to the General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65354. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission desires to update and refine the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives. SECTION 2: The General Plan Amendment is necessary to accomplish a comprehensive update of the General Plan that will incorporate new laws and requirements setforth by the State and to provide consistency between all elements of the General Plan. SECTION 3: The Planning Commission finds that the update of the General Plan will eliminate or substantially lessen all significant effects on the environment where feasible as shown in the findings under Section 15091 of the CEQA guidelines, and the Planning Commission has determined that any remaining significant effects on the 1n;g;gpreso.doc 174 , environment found to be unavoidable under Section 15091 are acceptable due to overriding concerns as described in Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 4: The Planning Commission further finds that the benefits gained by the City and its current and future residents by virtue of implementing the goals and policies of the proposed General Plan, override the unmitigatable effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report 94-1, and the attached Statement of Overriding Considerations (Exhibit A). SECTION 5: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed changes to 96 area land use designations will be compatible with surrounding land uses. SECTION 6: The General Plan Amendment includes revisions to the land use designation map in the City which reflect amendments to the current land use designations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment to the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach is recommended for adoption by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting held on the twelveth day of December, 1995. AYES: Holden, Livengood, Biddle, Kerins. Tillotson, Speaker NOES: None ABSENT: Gorman ABSTAIN: None ATTE : d d Zel?�yecrclfar y Planning Oommission Chairperson In;g;gpreso.doc 2 ATTACHMENT 9 General Plan Amendment Circulation Element E Traffic Modeling Highway Network Alternatives Data Comparisons and Analysis Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Traffic Model - Basic Elements Computer Model - a mathematical representation of a real system or condition. Traffic Model - a simulation of a geographic area which relates the social and economic characteristics or the land use and trip production characteristics to the road system in terms of traffic volumes and trip characteristics. (Model Area Map) HIGHWAY NETWORK Node - a location in the system, defined by coordinates, that creates one end of a link. Link - a road segment defined by two nodes, similar to "two points create a line" and with the added ability to assign characteristics to the link (number of lanes, speed, capacity, etc.) Centroid - a point located by coordinates which represents the area within a TAZ, and usually connected to one or more nodes. The land uses within a TAZ are related to the centroid(s) within the TAZ. (Figure 2) TAZ - Traffic Analysis Zone, a uniquely numbered area defined by three or more links, usually containing one or more centroids. (Figure 1) TRIP GENERATION Trip - a one-way movement from an origin to a destination. For example, going to the local store for groceries and going home from the store represent two (2) trips on the road system. Land Use Code - a unique number assigned to a specific land use designation. (Exhibit 1) Trip Generation Rate - the average number of trips which a specific land use will generate in a 24 hour period. 0014405.01 03/25/96 9:38 AM EXTENDED MODELING AREA rr r� I r . I Hw'r 22 \ • V:D7-:-1NG AREA \ I \ — I `\ r I nano o SAN7A :.-\A =!VAR I SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING /rtw COOPERATIVE STUDY Orange County , California =.�- -iBIT B --_- Robert Kahn , John Kain -ssocicies, Inc. fill. of 9 In oil% ,2 31 ol c 101 X SARA Trip Generation Table SARA TRIP GENERATION RATES 1 1 ! ;HBW !HBNW INHB HBW ;HBNW �NHB LUC !RATE (UNIT iP1 R2 IP3 Al A2 iA3 LAND USE DESCRIPTION 1101 131KSF 1 01 01 26, 48j 01 26.INDUST.,LIGHT 115i 1 ;KSF 0i 01 26: 48 01 26 1 INDUST.,McD-DOUGLAS 150i 51KSF 1 01 0! 26: 481 01 26;INDUST.,WAREHOUSE 1511 211KSF 01 01 26. 481 01 26',INDUST.,MINIWHSE 1701 381 SITE 01 01 26: 481 01 261 POWER PLANT 1851 201KSF 01 01 17i 331 331 17iINDUST.,NURSERY 2001 121DU 1 221 381 13i 51 14 8-RESID LOW 202; 9.8'DU j 201 561 8 0! 8, 8-.RESID MEDIUM 2041 8.6 DU 201 561 8. 01 8; 8;RESID IVIED HI 206 8.6'DU 201 56 8 0' 8, 8 RESID HIGH 2401 51DU 1 20, 561! 8 0; 81 8 RESID TRLR PRK 2501 41 DU 151 31{ 15 O j 24 i 15''RESID RETIRMNT 2601 3.16!DU 10i 50! 10 1 191 10;RESID CONGR. CARE 310, 10 RM 0 0': 17 20 j 461 17!HOTEL 320 9.RM 0 01 17 20 j 461 17 MOTEL 4111I 6IACRE 0; 0 12 0' 76! 12.REC,PARK,COMMUNITY 4121 5!ACRE 01 01 12 0! 76 12.REC,PARK,REGIONAL 4131 1 !ACRE j 01 0 12 0' 76! 12.REC.PARK,STATE 4141 7201KLF 01 0 15 51 651 15'REC,PARK,BEACH 4201 41BERTH 1 0 0! 17 8 58; 17:REC,MARINA 4301 91ACRE 1 0, 0 17 81 58! 17!REC,GOLF COURSE 4401 351KSIF 01 0i 24 4; 481 24iTHEATER 4921 441COURT 1 01 01 17 8; 581 17,REC,RACQ BALL CLUB 5201 11 STUDENT! 01 0' 0 10 901 01 SCHOOL, ELEM 5251 0.91 STUDENT j 01 01 0 10, 901 O:SCHOOL, INTERM 5301 1.41STUDENTI 01 0; 0 4' 96; 01,SCHOOL, HIGH 5401 1.51 STUDENT 1 01 0: 0 4: 961 0.SCHOOL, COLLEGE 5661 4.16ISITE ! 01 0 17 33: 33! 17'CEMETARY 5901 45.51KSIF 0 0, 17 19 47I 17'LIBRARY 6101 18'KSF 1 0 j 0 5. 32: 581, 5 i HOSPITAL 7101, 15 KSF ; 011 0; 23 391. 151 23,OFFICE PROFESS 732; 25 KSF 0 01 26 19! 291 26.POST OFFICE 740 25;KSF 0 0: 26 19; 291 26;CIVIC CNTR 811 i 41 ;KSF 0' 01 18 41 601 18;RETAIL, SPECIALTY 813! 151,KSF 0 0. 26 48. 01 26 1 INDUST.,LUMBER/HDWE 817: 35.KSF 01 0; 18 41 601 18 RETAIL, STRIP 8221 1351KSF 0 0 18 4i 601 18:RETAIL, NEIGHBOR 825! 70;KSF 0' Oj 17 6 601 17:RETAIL, COMMUNITY 8271 50lKSF 01 0i 15 13; 57 15!RETAIL, REGIONAL 8311 110 i KSF 0; 0; 17 51 611 17 j RESTRNT-QUALITY 8321 350!KSF 0 i 0 18 2I 621 18;H1 VOLUME CAFE 833; 9001 KSF 01 0 i 19 1 : 611 19.FAST FOOD 841 ! 400:ACRE 01 0 17 8' 581 17 AUTO DEALER 844: 750!STATION 0i 0 17 8 58 17 SERVICE STATION 8511 5501KSF 01 0 18 41 60! 18 RETAIL, CONVENIENCE 9311 0.01 !KSF ! 0! 0: 26 48! 01 26 NON STRCT 9321 0.61STALL 0`. 0. 17 8': 581 17 HORSE STABLE 9331 86IKSF 01 0 26 36 12i 26 REC,SENIOR CNTR 934I 40 i KSF 0': 0 17 8 58 17 REC,HEALTH SPA Pagel 0013352 General Plan Amendment Circulation Element Scenario No. 1 Street system is the completed Master Plan of Arterial Highways • includes the "cross-gap connector" • no Garfield bridge over the Santa Ana River • no Banning bridge over the Santa Ana River Land uses are defined by the "market analysis" plan known as GPAC-3. The Bolsa Chica area is assumed to be developed per Option B of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan . Traffic model predictions indicate that 32 roadway sections and 5 intersections will require careful monitoring. as full development occurs in the community. 0014617.01 Manus i i i s i s rs la n N o = n C I I I I I I _ { A N A P OI OD W o m n z p ,�A) L Z Z o 6 0 o O < 00 YA A A z L n Oi OO D A <c75 5 mQ o n r _2 En 1 � � sw7uuouc EX � �d) �• I Ilra51 — �l O- a ono =6 aand,na000 ooeoO jes �1 ! 1 XI IC ,l )l ' •. .Jr .�■■. ■.... ... .. 1 )� -- 0 „u000 O 'OdOd/ adAdd JOHO J b' ad �_.. I wXY 51 . Yt p'R',,,,of„L L,00., •• aeeeb9'�nCYI )eGuol'a0unu 'UCAlll UI YO. ''-MT 71 f'J4 XX(E�.t�wyN,pp 55 S' 6 O1D066 Ba ee'Gaeoc aeaer, ,ese OJ of eBOBO B -- c .11 y es eeee ease, ��' �er�17e eeeee ese ,oeee ----- ——•— -- — sl � I r•� ]i v \ cl Pn 4 lCullE —1 f_tih5� i � I I tes - DKS Associa IJ I� I �u>ti70:N1 c, I I � I I •v .-,,Nor r7 SG!_ .V I p..r_tisy T Ort1 '<. I i I I I i s1 I .' ------------ AV trCPK70� AV � z `� =f LEGEND Q �o — AOT EXCE"cOS LOS 'C' CAPACITY CITY BOUNDARY LEVEL OF SERVICE + o� ON.rvV,r.2 v I , ` -w'Lr«. .V h CROSS GAP CONNECTOR ,. ALTERNATIVE ■/•►y �'` 94�NIN(. .V POST YEAR 2010 ROADWAY / SEGMENTS OPERATING AT CITY OF % UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HUNTINGTON BEACH G. Q .- 7-1 SF�L i. VIE T 1INJ: SEACH I _ . u EI i V: cA < NGE.a J I I 'N4�,vE� rOUN i aIN • I i � I it --- VALLEY ,30L 3A CHIC: -, o - J I Gr1nr.G� z p� YCACCWN ways I I i f :NCaNVCUS Legend I t ATUNTA J C4 Boundary �qs HAMILTCN T Roadway Segment Level of S2.^rice • • •• Los o 1 SA;Yu:NG Intersection Level of Service J COSTA f/ MESA `—PM Peak Harr '•r / LOS f� -AM Peak Hour INTERSECTIONS AND ROADWAY SEGMENTS OPERATING BELOW LEVEL OF SERVICE C OF 0` -.-2T-9 POST GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN EIR 5.3-53 5.3 TR.A' -?3R7 A 7 IOL'/CiRCL1:1.T10.v f TABLE T-8 i Year 2010 AM and PM Peak Hour LOS at Signalized Intersections ANI Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS Bolsa Ave. - Bolsa Chica Rd. 0.68 B 0.73 D Bolsa Ave. - Graham S, 0.38 A 0.55 A Bolsa Ave. - Springdale St. 0.72 B O.ii C Bolsa Ave. - Edwards St. 0.69 B 0.76 C - f Bolsa Ave. - Golder. West St. 0.87 D 1.99 E Edinger Ave. - Bolsa Chica Rd. 0.82 D 0.80 C Edinger Ave. - Graham St. 0.49 A 0.53 A Edinger Ave. - Springdale St. 0.53 A 0.75 C Edinger Ave. -Edwards St. 0.-2 A 0.74 C Edinger Ave. Golden Wes-, St. 0.49 A .3.83 D Edinger Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.88 D 0.S2 D Varner Ave. - PCH O.S6 D 0.73 C Warner Ave. - Bolsa Chica Rd. 0.96 E 0.94 E Warner Ave. - Graham St. 0.52 A 0.62 C Warner Ave. - Springdale St. 0.57 A 0.65 B Warner Ave. - Edwards St. 0.61 B 0.71 C Warner Ave. -Golden West St. 0.72 C 0.65 D Warner Ave. - Beach Blvd. 030 C 0.81 D Slater Ave. - Edwards St. 0.62 B 0.62 B 1 Slater Ave. -Golden West St. 0.80 C 0.83 D Slater Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.90 D 0.91, C' t Talbert Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.72 C 0.82 D t! Ellis Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.67 B 0.94 E Garfield Ave. - Golden West St. 0.31 A 0.91 E Yorktown Ave. -Golden West St. 0.6i B 0.777 C t 1 1 Adams Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.71 C O.S5 D Adams Ave. - Magnolia St. 0.51 B 0.£+4 D Adams Ave. - Brookhurst St. O.S3 B O.S7 D i PCH -Golden West St. 0.70 B 0.70 B PCH- Beach Blvd. 0.38 A 0.80 C PCH - Brookhurst St. 0.68 B 0.66 B Brookhurst St- Hamilton 0.91 E 1.10 F LOS was determined using the intersection operational analysis methodology as described in Chapter 9 of the 1985 Highw?av CaFacity Manual, Source: DKS, Associates,March 21, 1995 HUNTINGTON B EACH GENERAL PLAN EIR 5.3-54 TA 11 LE T-7 2010 Level of Service Summary' RoadwaySegment V/C LOS Average Roadway x Italio Daily C assi[ication C Traffic z z Adams Avenue 0.45 A 17,000 4-lane primary arterial C) Main St. - Beach Blvd. 0.62 B 35,O()() 6-lane major arlerial -i Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.64 B 36,(X)O 6-lane major arterial O Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.75 C 42,000 6-lane major arterial z Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.60 B 34,000 6-lane major arterial CO Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.96 E 54,000 6-lane major arterial M East of Brookhurst St. Y r) Algonquin Street x Warner Ave. - Ileil Ave. 0.44 A 15,500 4-lane Secondary arli-rial o C) rn Atlanta Avenue z 1st St. - Beach Blvd. 0.64 11 24,000 4-lane primary arterial rn Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.19 A 7,0(X) 4-lane primary arterial W Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.24 A 9,()(X) 4-lane primary arterial `^ 1, r Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.35 A 13,0()0 4-lane primary arterial y Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.35 A 13,000 4-lane primary arterial 3+ 'j Banning Avenue zMagnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.17 A 6,(HN) 4 lane secondary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.20 A 7,0(X) 4-lane secondary arterial A m 'r n Cr r y Source: DKS Associates, 1994. o --------------------------------- • without Garfield and Banning liridges, with Cross Cap Connector. ASKAL Ufa aft 0 TABLE T-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadway Segment V/C 11S Average Roadway x " BAUQ Daily Classification c Traf l C z z Beach Boulevard 0.411 A 27,000 6-lane major ai Ivi ial n PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.53 A 30,000 6-lane major arlerial —i Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6-1ane major arterial O Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6-1ane major arterial z Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.67 11 38,000 6-lane major arterial Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.85 D 48,000 6-lane major arterial M Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.69 B 39,0011 6-lane major arterial y Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.72 C 54,000 8-lant. major arterial r1 Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 It '19,000 8-lane major arterial Wx Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.65 It '19,000 8-I,111e major ;)IIcri,►I .. Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.67 11 !i0,11U11 8-lane o►ajor arlc1i.11 M Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.76 C 57,000 8-1,111e 111ajor arterial z Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. M W Bolaa Chica Street > Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.55 A :11,0011 6-lane major arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.67 B 38,O()(1 6-lane major arterial 'n Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.112 D 46,000 6-Lane major arterial r McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.83 D 47j)(10 6-1ane major arterial o y Bolsa Ave. Rancho Ave. 0.99 li Z 56,000 6-lane major arterial �t .4 t» Bolen Avenue ti 7d Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.14 A 8,(N)() 6-1ane major arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.21 A 12,1H1(1 6-lane major arterial �l Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.44 A 25,000 6-lane major arterial Edwards St. -Golden West St. 0.62 B 35,O()O 6-lane major arterial r ---------------------------------- O witlwul Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Gap Connector. TABLE, T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary' Itoadway SegmentV/C _LO_S Average Roadway x alio Daily Classification C 'Traffic Z --i Drookhurst Street PCH - Dushard St. 0.34 A 19,1)llll 6-1ine major arterial Z llushard St. - Manning Ave. (),I I A 8,O()() 6-lane major arterial C) Manning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.32 A 18,(H)O 6-lime major arterial O Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.36 A 20,000 6-lane major arterial Z Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.41 A 23,000 6-1ane major arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.91 li 51,000 6-lane major arterial Adams Ave.- Yorktown Ave. 0.82 D 46,000 6-lane major arterial rn Yorktown Ave. Garfield Ave. 1).92 li Y 52,000 6-lane major arterial � n Dushard Street Drookhurst St. - Banning Ave. 0.31 A I I,000 4-lane Secondary arterial N Manning Ave. - I lamillon Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial M Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.25 A 9,()(H) 4-lane secondary arterial Z M Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane secondary arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial Y Adams Ave.- Yorktown Ave. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial r' Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.65 11 23,(H)O 4-lane secondary arterial r' Delaware Street D PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.28 A 10,1)011 4-lane secondary arterial � 7 Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.211 A Ill,l)l)l) Cline Secondaryarterial ry ' �. M Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.14 A 5,1100 4-lane Secondary arterial ~ Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.08 A 3,O(H) 4-1ane secondary arterial r Adams Ave. -Yorktown Ave. 0.14 A 5,0(N) Clare 4pxr,ndary arterial n Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.25 A 9,011() 4-lane secondary arterial n Garfield Ave. - Main St. 0.42 A 15,(X)O 4-lane secondary arterial Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-1ane secolut,ary arterial y .r O --------------------------------- • without Garfield and Mannin}; 1lridges, with Cross(yap Connector. �+ ww+� some" vum� mow. .mow .+� ,.�.. w..►� �...r ..�... ��.. _ -. __ a, n, a, TABLE 1-7 (con(.) 2010 Level of Service Summery* Roadway Segm at �� V/C LOS Average Roadway x 1 1 o Daily Classification z "i Edinger Avenue z Sunset Way E. -Saybrook I-n. 0.21 A 8,1H10 4-I.111v hrimary arterial n Saybrook Ln. - fantasia L.n. 0.61 It 2.1,000 4-lane prin►ary arlrrial --+ fantasia Ln. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.61 B 23,000 4-lane primary arlerial O Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.45 A 17,(H)l) 4-lane primary arterial z Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.61 B 23,000 4-lane primary arterial as Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.55 A 31,000 6-Line major arterial M Edwards St. -Golden West St. 0.75 C 12,(H)O 6-1ane major ,►rterial Y Colden West St. - Cothard St. 0.78 C 44,(H)0 6-lane major arterial v, n Cothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.75 C 12,000 6-lane major arterial Beach Blvd. Newland St. 0.71 C 10,000 (,-lar►e 111iti 1. arlrri,ll w C) m Edwards Street Z Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arlerial t» Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 It 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial 7o Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.31 A I I'mo 4-lane secondary i►rlerial rSlater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,1HH) 4-lane secondary arterial �o Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.65 D 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial < YEdinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.76 C 27,000 4-lane secondary arterial j z McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.67 B 24,000 4-lane secouulary arterial a Bulsa Ave. - Westminster Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial m .. o 7d n n ---------------------------------- r Y • without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. TA—VIE T-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summery" Roadway Seg V/C LOS Average Roadway xiuiiq Daily Classification C Traffic z Ellis Avenue z Edwards St. - Golden West St. 0.35 A 13,0U11 Cline primary arterial n Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.19 A 7,000 4-lane primary arterial —+ Gothard St. - Delaware St. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane secondary arterial O Delaware St. - Main St. ([leach Blvd.) 0.20 A 7,000 4-lane secondary arterial z Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.84 D 30,000 4-lane secondary arterial Cu M Garfield Avenue Y Edwards St. - Golden West St. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane major arterial �„ rl Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.64 11 36,000 6-lane major arterial w Gothard St. - Main St. 0.55 A 31,()()() 6-lane major arterial 0 Main St. - Delaware St. 0.67 B 25,(N)O 4-1ane primary arterial rn Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.83 D 31,000 4-lane primary arterial z Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 1.07 I: 40,000 4-lane primary arterial M Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.83 D 31,()OO 4-lane primary arterial :0 Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.53 A 20,(H)O 4-lane primary arterial 4' Y Bushard St. - Brookhursl St. 0.45 A 17,(X)O 4-lane primary arterial r- Brookhurst St. - Ward St. 0.51 A 19,()(10 4-lane primary arterial •a •o y -- — o z Y m ^l • J b C7 O without Garfield and Ilannin}; 11rid},es, with Cross Gap Connector. �� �►+•,► or► Est' 11w1r! rl "Wow nn111rrr saw fta" .owns. .,. ,�... .� 'I'111ILF T-7 (Cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary' oadway Segmit J V/C LDS Average Roadway Ratio Daily Classification C, ZraffLC z -1 Golden West Street PCH -Orange Ave. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lame major arlerial n Orange Ave. - Palm Ave. 0.44 A 25,000 0-lane major arterial 1 Palm Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6-lane major arterial p Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.59 A 33,000 6-lane major arterial z Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.55 A 31,000 6-lane major arterial Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.53 A 311,11O0 6-lane major arterial w Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.57 A 32,000 6-lane major arterial m y Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.52 A 29,000 6-lane major arterial n Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.69 Il 39,(Hlll 6-lane major ,Aerial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.67 IS 3H,1)llll 6-lane major arterial u, Ettinger Ave. -McFadden Ave. ON) C 45,000 6-lane major arterial m McFadden Ave. - Uolsa Ave. 0.711 C 44,000 6-1.111t. major al terial z m Colliard Street 70 Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.20 A 7,000 4-lame secondilly arterial > Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.36 A 13,(HI(1 4-lane Secondary arterial r Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.42 A 15,OO(1 4-lane secondary arterial -d Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.59 A 21,1H111 4 1,111e st-condary arterial r-' Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.81 D 29,1H111 4-lane Secondary arterial =o 1' Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 1.12 1: '10,000 4-lane secondary arterial Edinger Ave. - Center Ave. 0.93 li a3 llllll 4-1a11e secondary arterial m Center Ave. - McFadden Ave. 1.35 l: 4H,000 4-lane secontl;iry arterial --------------------------------- � n n r r ti 1 O C ' without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. I TABLET-7 (coat.) i 2010 Level of Service Summary" Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway t io Daily Classification C Traffic Z 'i Graham Street Z Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial n Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial --i Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.22 A 8,000 Clare secondary arterial O Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial z McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial I 00 M Hamilton Avenue Y Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.43 A 16,(H)11 4-lane primary arterial u, n Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.83 D 31,000 4-1a1le primary arterial w x Magnolia St. Bushard St. 0.72 C 27,000 4-lane primary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.75 C 28,000 4-lane primary arterial M Z Iled Avenue M Saybrook Ln.- Algonquin St. 0.25 A 9,(H)O 4-lane secondary arterial W Algonquin St. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.39 A 14,1H1(1 4-lane secondary arterial `^ > Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.59 A 21,000 4-1ane secondary arterial u' r Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.84 D 3O,(X)O 4-lane secondary arterial `b Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.53 A 19,()()l1 4-lane secondary arterial Ln r Edwards St. - Colden West St. 0.67 it 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial ZGolden West St. - Cothard St. 0.56 A 20,M0 4-lane secondary arterial A Gotham St. - Beach Blvd. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arterial A M Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane Second;►ry arterial O 7d n n . r . A Q) l Without Car(ield and Banning; Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. TABLE T-7 (cant.) 2010 Level of Service Summary• Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway t. 1'u Daily ctIssificalion x Tra f jc C z Indianapolis Avenue Delaware St. Deach Illvd. 0.80 C' 10,000 :► Liar conuuulcr Beach Blvd. Newland Sl. 0.34 A I I,lllll) 4-Mini• sccond.uy allcrial n Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.65 B 2.1,000 4-1a11e secondary arterial --1 Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.59 A 21,000 4-Line secondary arterial O Dushard St. - Brookhursl St. 0.62 Il 22,(X)0 Clare secondary arterial z Lake Street m PCH - Atlanta Ave. 0.35 A 13,11UO 4-lane primary arterial y Atlanta Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.29 A I I,(H)() 4-lane primary arterial u, n Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.37 A 14,000 4-lane primary arterial w x v C) Magnolia Street m PCH - Banning Ave. 0.19 A 7,000 4-lane primary arterial z Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.19 A 7,(11)ll I-I,►ne primary arterial on Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.45 A 17,000 Cline primary arterial Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.64 B 24,000 4-lane primary arterial � > Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.53 A 20,(X)o 4-1ane primary arterial y r' Adams Ave. -Yorktown Ave. 0.59 A 22,000 4-1a11e primary arterial "7 Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.75 C 21i,0011 4-lane primary arterial `^ o y Main Street y 7 ;- Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.69 II 26,001) 6-lane major arterial y M Garfield Ave. - Delaware St. 0.77 C 29,(N)(1 4-lane primary arterial o Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.66 11 37,000 4-lane primary arterial n . n r r ti 1 Q without Garfield and Danninl; Ilrid}�es, with Cross Cap Connector. TABLE T-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadway Segment V/C LQS Average Roadway Itatia Daily C1asliL-LL x Trajfic C Z McFadden Avenue "i I.Usa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.17 A 6,(H)0 4-lime secondary arlerial Z Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.51 A loom) 4-1ane secondary arlerial n Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.70 11 25,000 4-1ane secondary arterial -1 Edwards St. -Golden West St. 0.81 D 29,000 4-1ane secondary arlerial O Golden West St. - Golhard St. 0.70 C 25,(K)O 4-1ane secondary arterial Z Gothard St. - peach Blvd. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial 03 M Newland Street A f CH - Hamilton Ave. 0.36 A 11,()ll0 4-Jane secondary arterial u� n Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.34 A 12,0()O 4-lane secondary arlerial 4+ x Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.51 A 18,000 4-1ane secondary arlerial 00 C) Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-1ane secondary arlerial M Adams Ave.- Yorktown Ave. 0.59 A 21,(X)O 4-1ane secondary arterial Z Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.79 C 28,000 4-lane secondary arterial M Garfield Ave. - Eillis Ave. 0.56 A 20,(H)O 4-lane secondary arterial Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 13 24,(H)O 4-lane secondary arterial a Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arlerial y rr Slater Ave. - Werner Ave. 0.51 A 19,00() 4-lane secondary arlerial ' 'd Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.51 A 18j)(11) 4-lane secondary arterial r � C)j Orange Avenue ti Golden West St. - 171h St. 0.20 A 7,0110 4-1ane secondary arterial y M 171h St. - 6th St. 0.81 D 29,000 Cline secondary arlerial o n n r y O i ' without th Cross Gap Connector. o.MM wtrw arm it w tiOMIM MOAN wwq i#wha M� NON Mangano a ,TABLE,T-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summary' Roadway Sea riu V/C LOS Average Roadway x patio Daily Classification C: Traffic z -� PCI I zNorth of Warner Ave. 1.52 I: 57,000 4-lane primary .111c ial n Warner Ave. - Sea Point St. 1.31 I: 49,000 1-lanc III imary arterial --i Sea Point St. - Golden West St. 1.15 1- 43,000 1-lane primary arterial p Golden West St. - 17th St. 0.78 C 44,000 6-lane major arterial z 17th St. - 6th St. 0.69 B 39,011O 6-lane major arterial w 6th St. - Lake St. 0.76 C 43,000 6-1ane major anti ial rn Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.80 C 45,000 6-lane major arterial y Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.85 D 48,000 6-lane major arterial u� n peach Blvd. - Newland Ave. 0.75 C 42,000 6-1ane major arterial Newland Ave. - Magnolia Ave. 0.81 D 17,000 6-1a11e n►;►jor arterial Magnolia Ave. - Broukhurst St. 0.87 D 419,000 6-lane major arterial ITS South of Broukhurst St. 1.19 1: 67,000 6-1ane major arterial 7, m Saybrook Lane !PO Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.31 A 11,110O 4-lane secondary arterial Y r� Slater Avenue Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.11 A 4,000 '-lane secondary ill(erial Springdale St. - Edwards St. OAR A 17,()l)O 4-lane secondary arterial v Y Edwards St. - Golden West St. 0.5:1 A 19,O1111 4 lane st-colidary arterial Golden West St. - Cothard St. 0.56 A 20,000 4•lane secondary ;u'lerial y m Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.48 A 17,(H)O 4-lan sondary arterial .� eec o Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.53 A 19,(1l)ll 4-lane secondary arterial n n r O --------------------------------- without Garfield and Banning Bridles, with Cross Cap Connector. TABLET-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summary" Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway x Ratio Daily Classificalion C 'Traffic z 'i Springdale Street 7 Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.64 It 24,000 1 la+u. primary arterial C) Slaler Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.80 C primary arterial —1 Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial O Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.80 C 3(),(1UO 4-1ane primary arterial z Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.69 Il 26,000 Clare primary arterial McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.96 I: 36,(K)O '-lane primary arterial m North of Bolsa Ave. 1.15 F 43,000 4-lane primary arterial Y oil n Talbert Avenue 4+ x Golden West St. - Cothard St. 0.24 A 9,()(H) 4-lane primary arterial o C) Cothard St. Beach Blvd. 012 A 12,000 4-lane primary arterial m Beach Blvd. Newland St. 0.411 A 18,OOO 4.1a11e prinm►ry arterial z 11 rn Ward Street W Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.31 A 11,110O 4-lime secondary arterial �^ y � r Warner Avenue `b l CH - Algonquin St. 0.57 A 32,()011 6-lane major arty-rial r r' Algonquin St. - llolsa Chica 51. 0.67 11 38,1H10 6-lane major arterial v z Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.73 C 41,MO 6-lane major arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.67 11 38,mo 6-lane major arterial a M Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.53 A 3O,(N)O 6-Lane major arterial Edwards St. -Golden Wes( St. 0.59 A 33,(N)0 6-1ane major arterial Golden West St. - Cothard St. 0.67 B 38,(X)O 6-lane major arterial n Cothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.82 D 46,000 6-lane major arterial n Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.83 D 47,(N)O 6-lane major arterial Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.99 1: 56,(X)O 6-lane major irterial y O -- r • without Carlicld and Bannin}; lkid},es, with Cross Cap Connector. n a m a n n a TABLE T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary' x 1104dway Se I. V/C IQS Average Roadway flAtLo Daily Classificalion < Traffic Yorktown Avenue Golden West St. - Main St. 0.77 C 29,000 4-1a11e 1►rir►►ary arterial n Main St. - Lake St. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane socontlaq arterial •-I Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial O Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.31 A ll,llll() 4-lane secondary arterial Z Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.48 A 17,000 11-lane secondary arterial 03 Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arterial m Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.62 B 22,000 4-liuup secondary arterial y Bushard St. - Brookhursl St. 0.76 C 27,000 4-lane secondary arterial u rl Brookhursl St. - Ward St. 0.39 A 14,000 4-1ane secondary arterial w � n 17111 Street ►.,,► PCH - Orange Ave. 0.29 A 11,000 1 I,uu• hrimi►ry arteri,►I z Orange Ave. - I'alin Ave. 0.56 A 21,000 1 lane primary i►rlerial ITS Palm Ave. - Main St. 0.48 A Ifi,l1l111 �I tune ►rin►ar arterial 70 �. > r .y ti Y ti m y O 7d n n r r 1- "'I O ' without Garfield and Banning Brid};es, with Cross Gap Connector. General Plan Amendment Circulation Element Scenario No. 2 Street system is the completed Master Plan of Arterial Highways • includes the "loop connector" road (Orange Co. Bolsa Chica development plan) • no Garfield bridge over the Santa Ana River • no Banning bridge over the Santa Ana River Land uses are defined by the "market analysis" plan known as GPAC-3. The Bolsa Chica area is assumed to be developed per Option B of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan . Traffic model predictions indicate that 29 roadway sections and 4 intersections will require careful monitoring as full development occurs in the community. 0014617.01 vA-S r—S _do DKS Assocates l .� BSA T I I Nor I ro S:.AL- pINC.tii AV •'I � I ` I I _ �� I I I ► I I �� A,, I \\ N NI I 1 MI.?V!? AV OAv[�Iv0i7 Ci I ► <I N I � I•� �♦ C v II I I S:A=4 I AV ------------ I C of "I I t II `\ ••\\ Cv1 I f�i it HI „1 I � � TA_?T I AV \ C dl �� Q81 f 1 E'1S 1 AV S. LA�mpj AV II{ N� L."...I AV zi I : "N �I — 1 '- M NI I ADws � AV ItiT'crZStCiION OPERATING WORSE THAN LEVEL OF SERVICE '0' OURI`v AM AND/OP. PM PEAK HOURS i �'~Cf OI I IH01 A4.VCL:$ AV� - I AVE) � �f �I aI %/ CITY BOUNDARY Oo N Ati4ITA I AV III CI / NANllrp4 AV CROSS GAP LOOP .Ira A ALTERNATNE ` B C AV POST YEAR 2010 C7, Ar.MN / j INTERSECTIONS OPERATING AT CITY OF "' % UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HUNTINGTON BEACH i I DKS Associates ?J.SA I AV AV 4 I I I I NOT 7J SCALE a..CO I l � � I I ► Y �I ► 1 Q 1`L/ C cl vtl I I I ✓ `C/ I `. ' I W4?,Ic? AV DAvc DR I I I vl nl I � I • is I .V �9/rup ZI AV I I I 0 t , I V 1✓I © I GAi�1 I .V I NI t 1c �.y f 4 F I r..TOM/ All 3 H► ^� I // LEGEND . s` I NI I I I AJD YS I AV © / •�•� — ADT EXCEEDS LOS "C" CAPACITY ei ^^ — CITY BOUNDARY Jf 4IIl Z) LEVEL OF SERVICE wA.'q,�S!No AV Ll I ♦�F� I � N � a / . 01 N AZAlIT._I AV 2 / # z r = HALI<<a AV CROSS GAP LOOP ALTERNATIVE 9w�nwO AV i POST YEAR 2010 ROADWAY CITY OF n j/ UNACCEPTABLE LEVE ST HUNTINGTON RFACH MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Revised) Page 6 TABLE I INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE' SUMMARY FOR POST Y1?Alt 2010 AI,TI?RNA'l'IVM BUILD-OUT TO MI'AII WITIIOUT MITIGATION Cross Gap Connector Alternative Cross Gap Loop Alternative AM Peak IIour PM Pesilt Ilour AM I'mk Flour I'M Peak Ilour Intersection V C Ratio LQS VIC Raliu LQS VIC Ra io I_QS V/ Ratio LOS Bolsa Avc./Bolsa Chica St. 0.68 B 0.73 C 0.68 13 0.72 C Bolsa Ave./Graham St. 0.38 A 0.55 A 0.38 A 0.55 A Ilolsa Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.72 (' 0.77 (' 0.72 Ilolsa Avell dwards St. 0.69 13 0.76 C' 0.61) II 0.76 C 13olsa Ave./Goldui)west St. oxi V) 0.0 I;=, 0.87 1) 0.98 1? Edinger Avc./Bolsa Chica St. 0.82 D 0.80 C 0.82 D 0.81 D Edinger Ave./Graham St. 0.49 A 0.53 A 0.50 A 0.53 A Edinger Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.53 A 0.75 C 0.53 A 0.75 C Edinger Ave./Edwards St. 0.44 A 0.74 C U.44 A 0.74 C Edinger Avc./Goldenwes( St. 0.49 A 0.83 D 0.49 A 0.83 1) I (linger Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.88 D 0.82 D 0.88 D 0.82 D Warner Avc./PCH 0.86 D 0.73 C 0.87 D 0.74 C WAtnor A.VC. M.% Dictt St. 0.96 X? . 0 94 J.-, 0.w l; 0,98 C�, MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Revised) Page 7 TABLE 1 (Coil.) i Cross Gap Connector Allcrnalive Cross (.:ap Loop Allernalive AM Peak hour I'M I'C:Ik hour AWI Peale Ilour VM 1'cnlc 114)111- Intcrscction VLQ IZ;►tio LOS V/ R;ilk LQS VLltatio LOS VI ' Ratio LOS Warner Ave./Graliarn St. 0.52 A 0.62 C 0.54 A 0.62 B Warner Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.57 A 0.65 Il 0.57 A 0.67 11 Warner Ave./Edwards St. 0.61 11 0.71 C 0.62 II 0.71 C Warner Ave./Goldcnwcs( St. 0.72 C 0.85 1) 0.74 C 0.85 D Warner Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.80 C 0.81 1) Sla(cr Ave./Edwards St. 0.62 13 0.62 B 0.65 It 0.62 11 Slater Ave./Goldcnwcst St. 0.80 C 0.85 D 0.80 C 0.85 D Slater Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.90 1) 0.911 C'1 0.90 1) o.91 r C1 Talbert Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.72 C 0.82 1) 0.72 C 0.82 D Ellis Ave.nlettch Blvd. 0.67 1) o 94 E: OAT 13 0.94 r. Garfield Avc./Gold4nwesl St. 0.51. A' 91 1E; : 0.49 A 0.86 D , Yorktown Ave./Goldemvest St. 0.61 13 0.77 C 0.61 11 0.76 C Adams Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.71 C 0.85 1) 0.71 C 0.87 D Adams Ave./Magnolia St. 0.61 B 0.84 1) 0.61 B 0.84 D MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Revised) Page 8 TABLE I (ConL) Cross Gap Connector Altcrnalive Cross C:ap Loop Allcrim ive AM Peak Hour I'M Peal( Hour AM Peale I lour I'M Peak f lour Immection VLQ Zati _ LQS V/C Ratio L_OS V/ ' Ratio LOS VIC Ratio LOS Adams Ave./Brookhurst St. 0.83 D 0.87 D 0.83 D 0.87 D PCII/GolclenWest St. 0.70 11 0.70 13 0.71 C 0.71 C PCI1/I3each Blvd. 0.58 A 0.80 C 0.58 A 0.80 C PCII/Brookhurst St. 0.68 13 0.66 11 0.67 II 0.66 11 Brooklturst St./HriMilloo 'St. 0.91 ;' :a0 r 0.9 Level of Service was determined using the intersection operational analysis methodology, as described in Chapter 9 of the 1985 I ighway Capacily Mcinual. MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Itevised) 1'abc 9 TABLE 2 INTERSECTION LEVEL Ole SERVICE SUMMARY FOR YEAR 2010 MITIGATED INTERsEcTIONS BUILD-OUT BEYOND MPAII WITH MITIGATION Cross Gap Conucclor Altcrnalive Cross Gap Loop Allcrualivc AM Peal( Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peal( hour I'M Peak Ilour Intersection JC Ratio LO,S V/ Itati LOS V/ Ratio LQS V Ratio LOS Beach Blvd./Ellis Ave. 0.60 A 0.86 D 0.60 A 0.84 D Bolsa Ave./Goldcnwcst St. 0.71 C 0.85 D 0.71 C 0.85 D Ilrookhurst St./Hamilton Ave. 0.69 Il 0.81 D 0.70 11 0.81 C Bolsa Chica St./Warner Ave. 0.44 A 0.79 C 0.44 A 6.79 C Garfield Ave./Goldcnwcst St. 0.47 A 0.67 11 0.48 A 0.68 11 v General Plan Amendment Circulation Element Scenario No. 3 Street system is the existing Huntington Beach street system • no "cross-gap connector" • no Gothard to Hoover connection link • no Hamilton extension from Beach to Newland • no Pacific View Avenue extension from 1st Street to Beach • no Garfield bridge over the Santa Ana River • no Banning bridge over the Santa Ana River Land uses are defined by the "market analysis" plan known as GPAC-3. The Bolsa Chica area is assumed to be developed per Option B of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan . Traffic model predictions indicate that 32 roadway sections and 6 intersections will require careful monitoring as full development occurs in the community. 0014617 01 1 Csly—srm AV DKS Associates 901SA AV YcFADDEN AV T mor ro SCALE ue mv.CER AV MEJL AV N -Altr�2 A V DAWPdl1 d!l n N AV ■ ``\ NI NI N 11 SMT I AV O Fi AV N ■ � g EMI AV LEGEND ® `` I AD AA4 Av ® / �� - ADT EXCEEDS LOS 'C' CAPACITY ` �� • �� - CITY BOUNDARY LEVEL OF SERVICE �Y�^0j0 4 a� (wpAr+A�LS AV O, / CP Ar: AiLANTA2 AV Q� NO UNFUNDED ROADS AND k/JItTQN AV NO BOLSA CHICA LOWLANDS DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE LOW • 9AHrAwC AV POST YEAR 2010 ROADWAY IrSEGMENTS OPERATNG CITY OF ® % UNACCEPTABLE LJ=VELST HUNTINGTON BEACH �. / Figure 1 1KSTV64SrEFt AN DKS Associates V d ApOp� AV � I ro SOOT UE I CN110 AV i 147E AV 1fIJ?ER AV OANp4011T pR P � r - N AV 7O lW b C �'p 3 CLUS AV 1 i /7 Q p, All W O = LOW4 I All LEGEND 'I N LEG_ D "D""s "V • THANR LEVELO OF SERVICEG WRSE 'D O DURING AM AND/OR PM PEAK HOURS 4 "TC�• o hQ.wAvQ.S Av 1 — CITY BOUNDARY N N iZ Oc AVE IATLA�aos AV P4� m NO UNFUNDED ROADS AND =°r _ 2 wA,A,TIM. AV NO BOLSA CHCA LOWLANDS DEVELOP$AEW ALTERNATNE •41' •` �,5, BANNING AV / POST YEAR 2= NTERSECTfONS OPERATING AT CITY OF �`> % UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HUNTINGTON BEACH s 3 HUN T ING T ON BEACH GENEIRAL PLAN Average V/C Daily Roadway Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification u Level of Service !j Summary of GPAC 3 Post 2010 No Unfunded Roads �I and No Balsa Chica Development �}Adams Avenue Main St. — Beach Blvd. 0.43 A 16,000 4—lane onmary arterial !i Beach Blvd. — Newland St. 0.62 B 35.000 o"—lane major arterial Newland St. — Magnolia St. 0.64 B 36,000 6—lane major arterial it Magnolia St. — Bushard St. 0.75 C 42,000 6—lane maior arterial i Bushard St. — Brookhurst St. 0.60 B 34.000 6—lane major arerial past of Brookhurst St. 0.94 53,000 6—Iona major arterial j Algonquin Street I Warner Ave. — Heil Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4—lane secondary arterial Ji I Atlanta Avenue 1 st St. — Beach Blvd. 0.75 C 28,000 4—lane primary arterial ;I Beach Blvd. — Newland St. 0.37 A 14,000 4—lane primary arterial !I Newland St. — Magnolia St. 0.37 A 14,000 4—lane primary arterial Magnolia St. — Bushard St. 0.43 A 16,000 4—lane primary arterial Bushard St. — Brookhurst St. 0.43 A 16,000 4—lane primary arterial I� Banning Avenue li Magnolia St. — Bushard St. 0.17 A 6,000 4—lane secondary arterial Bushard St. — Brockhurst St. 0.17 A 6,000 4—lane secondary arterial iI Beach Boulevard II I �i PCH — Hamilton Ave. 0.48 A 27,000 6—lame major arterial !, Hamilton Ave. = Atlanta Ave. 0.48 A 27,000 6—lane major arterial Atlanta Ave. — Indianapolis Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6—lane major arterial j Indianapolis Ave. — Adams Ave. 0.69 B 39.000 6—lane major arterial �I j Adams Ave. — Yorktown Ave. 0.66 B 37,000 6—lane major arterial Yorktown Ave. — Garfield Ave. 0.83 D 47.000 6—lane major arterial it (` Garleld Ave. — Ellis Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6—lane major arterial l =11is Ave. — Talbert Ave. 0.72 C 54,000 8—lane major arterial ;I i I ! Talbert Ave. — Slater Ave. 0.65 B 49,000 8—lane major arterial Slater Ave. — Warner Ave. 0.65 B 49,000 8—lane major arterial II Warner Ave. — Heil Ave. 0.67 B 50.000 8—lane major arterial !, Heil Ave. — Edinger Ave. 077 C 58,000 8—lane major arterial �I Balsa Chico Street I Warner Ave. — Heil Ave. 0.53 A 30,000 6—lane major arterial Heil Ave. — Edinger Ave. 0.69 B 39.000 6—lane major arterial Edinger Ave. — McFadden Ave. 0.82 D 46,000 6—lane major arterial il .McFadden Ave. — Balsa Ave. 0.83 D 47,000 6—lane major arterial Balsa Ave. — Rancho Ave. 1.01 F 57.000 6—lane major arterial I i I Page 1 r 'HUNTINGTON BEACH GEh PLAN Average V/C Daily Roadway Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification II Balsa Avenue Balsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.14 A 8,000 6-lane major arterial Graharn St. - Springdale St. 0.21 A 12.000 6-lane major arterial Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.46 A 25,000 6-lane majorar;erial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.71 C 40,000 6-lane major arterial i Brookhurst Street PCr; - Bus-ad St. 0.34 :, 19,000 6-lane ma;crarterial Bus„ard St. - Banning Ave. 0.14 A 8,000 6-lane maicrarterial Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.32 A 18,000 6-lane major arterial Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.41 A 23,000 6-lane major arterial li Atlanta A:e. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.39 A 22,000 6-iane major arterial it Indianapaiis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.91 E 51.000 6-lane major arterial i Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.83 0 47,000 6-lane r-ajor a.:erial I! Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.94 E 53,000 6-lane major arterial i� Bushard Street j Brockihurst St. - Banning Ave. 0.31 A 11.000 4-fare saccnday arterial II aan„ing Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-!ane secondary arterial �amiiton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial j Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane secondary arterial ;I Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial !I Delaware Street PCH - Ham Ave. 0.11 A 4,000 4-lane secondary arterial Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.11 A 4,000 4-lane secondary arterial i� Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.14 A 5,000 4-lane secondary arterial pl � Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.08 A 3,000 4-lane secondary arterial I Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.14 A 5.000 4-lane secondary arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial li Garfield Ave. - Main St. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane seconday arterial f Edinger Avenue !� Sunset Way E. - Saybrook Ln. 0.21 A 8,000 4-lane primary arterial II Savbrcok Ln. - Fantasia Ln. 0.61 B 23.000 4-lane crimary arterial !� iFantasia Ln. - Solsa Chica St. 0.61 B 23,000 4-lane primary arterial Balsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.45 A 17,000 4-lane primary arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.61 B 23,000 4-lane primary arterial j Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.52 A 29,000 6-lane major arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.69 B 39,000 6-lane major arterial Goidenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.69 B 39,000 6-lane major arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.75 C 42,000 6-lane major arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.76 C 43,000 6-lane major arterial `Edwards Street Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.45 A 16.000 4-lane secondary arterial I Ellis Ave - Talbert Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial Page 2 1 rJNTi G T 0 N BEACH GENERAL PLAN Average II V/C Oaily Roadway 4 Roadway SegmentRatio LOS Traffic Classification Talber- Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.31 A 11.000 4-lane seccr.dary arterial II Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial ;I Yiarr.er Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial i veil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial dingar Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.79 C 28,000 4-lane secondary arterial Nlcsadden Ave. - Balsa Ave. 0.81 0 29,000 4-lane secondary arterial Balsa Ave. - Westminster Ave. 0.67 B 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial t Ellis Avenue Il Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.32 A 12,000 4-lane primary arterial `I Golda:nwest St. - Gothard St. 0.19 A 7.000 4-lana cr,r,ary arterial Ill f Gothard St. - Delaware St. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secordary arterial II 0e!a---.are St. - Main St. Beach _ 0.11 A 4,000 =-!ane secondary arterial I Beac- 3Nd. - Newland St. 0.84 D 30.000 4-lana secondary arterial I Garfield Avenue I' Edward's St. - Goldenwest St. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane .-najvarterial { Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.64 B 36,000 6-lane na'ararterial II Gothard St. - Main St. 0.57 A 32.000 6-lane major arterial � !.'aim St. - Delaware St. 0.69 B 26,000 ;-1ana ;,rimary artara] l :I Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.85 0 32,000 4-lane prinary arterial I iiBeach Bwd. - Newland St. 1.07 F 40,000 4-lane primary arterial Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.83 c ' 31,000 4-lane prir-any arterial 'j Magnolia St. - Busf"ard St. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial Busnard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.4.8 A 18.000 4-lane primary arterial j S.ockhurst St. - Ward St. 0.51 A 19,000 4-lane prir iary arterial l '.I i Goldenwest Street ! PCH - Orange Ave. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane najorarerial Orange Ave. - Palm Ave. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane major arterial l Palm Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.69 B 39,000 6-lane majorarterial Ycr:C--wrn Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.57 A 32.000 6-lane majorarterial 4� GarSe!d Ave. - Ellis Ave. O.S2 A 29,000 6-lane i-najorarterial f I Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.52 A 29.000 6-lane maiorarterial Talbar'1% - Slater Ave. 0.55 A 31,000 6-lane major arterial Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.53 A 30.000 6-lane maior arterial Wa,nerAve. - Heil Ave. 0.69 B 39,000 6-lava rnalorarterial II Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.67 B 38,000 o"-lane major arterial I Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.78 C 44.000 6-lane major arterial II McFadden Ave. - Balsa Ave. 0.96 E S4,000 6-lane major arterial f f a I Gotham Street Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.17 A 6.000 4-lane secondary arterial Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial i Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial t Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.51 A 18,000 4-lane secondary arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.70 C 25.000 4-lane secondary arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.95 E 34.000 4-lane secondary arterial Edinger Ave. - Center Ave. O.S9 A 21.000 4-lane secondary arterial Center Ave. - McFadden Ave. 1.04 F 37,000 4-lane secondary arterial i Page 3 i HUNTING T ON BEACH GENERAL PLAN Average V/C Daily Roadway :I Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification l Graham Street �I Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.20 A 7,000 4-lane secondary arterial .1 Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.51 A 18,000 4-lane secondary arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.17 A 6,000 4-lane secondary arterial Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial II i Mcsadden Ave. - Solsa Ave. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial it ;i Hamilton Avenue Beach Blvd. -- Newland St. 0.00 A 0 4-lane primary arterial it Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial !.Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.51 A 19.000 4-!arie primary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial it Heil Avenue Saybrook Ln. - Algonquin St. 0.25 A 9,000 4-1ane secondary arterial II Algonquin St. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial ;I Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial II l Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.81 D 29,000 4-lane secondary arterial Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial cdwards St. -- Goldenwest St. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial :i Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arterial li Beach Byd. - Newland St. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial j�Indianapolis Avenue Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.80 C 11,000 2-lane commuter I Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane secondary arterial .II Newland St. - Magnolia St. secondary ' 0.67 B 24,000 �-lane saconda arterial , i Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.62 B 22.000 4-lane secondary arterial i Sus^ard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial .` I� Lake Street jl ji PCH - Atlanta Ave. 0.40 A 15,000 4-lane Primary arterial :I Atlanta Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.32 A 12.000 4-lane primary arterialsa j ,dams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.37 A 14,000 4-lane primary arterial i I i iMagnolia Street I PCH - Banning Ave. 0.21 A 8,000 4-lane primary arterial Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.19 A 7.000 4-lane primary arterial i Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.48 A 18.000 4-lane primary arterial Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.64 B 24,000 4-lane primary arterial 1 Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.53 A 20,000 4-lane primary arterial itAdams Ave. -- Yorktown Ave. 0.56 A 21.000 4-lane primary arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.75 C 28,000 4-lane primary arterial Main Street Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.72 C 27,000 4-lane primary arterial Garfield Ave. - Delaware St. 0.77 C 29.000 4-lane primary arterial I Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.66 B 37.000 4-lane primary arterial Page 4 HUNTING70N BEACH GENE?AL PLAN I Average V/C Oaily Roadway Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification �i McFadden Avenue Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.17 A 6,000 4-1ane secondary arterial .j Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial I'I Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.67 8 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.70 C 25,000 4-lane secondary arterial !' Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.67 B 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.90 0 32,000 4-lane secondary arterial !i j Newland Street !� 1 PCH - Hamifton Ave. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lare secorndary arterial j Harni"on Ave. - Atlana Ave. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arteriai it Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial .i' Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial j Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.79 C 28.000 4-lane secondary arterial GarSeld Ave. - Eillis Ave. 0.59 A 21.000 4-lane secondary arterial iff Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial !j i` Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.62 8 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial ;I Sla;erAve. - Warner Ave. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial II Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial ;I Orange Avenue �I Goldenwest St. - 17th St. 0.20 A 7,000 4-lane secondary arterial 17th St. - 6th St. 0.84 D 30,000 4-lane secondary arterial I.PCH j� North of Warner Ave. 1.52 F 57,000 4-lane primary arterial j i Warner Ave. - Sea Point St. 1.31 F 49,000 4-lane crimay arterial Sea Point St. - Golden West St. 1.15 F 4.3,000 4-lane primary arterial `I i Goldenwest St. - 17th St. 0.76 C 43.000 6-lane majorarterial ' 17th St. - 6th St. 0.67 B 38,000 o"-lane major arterial I� 6th St. - Lake St. 0.76 C 43,000 6-lane major arterial II j� Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.76 C 43,000 6-lane major arterial iI Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.92 E 52,000 6-lane major arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland Ave. 0.87 0 49.000 6-lane major arterial I Newland Ave. - Magnolia Ave. 0.89 D 50.000 6-lane major arterial l� Magnolia Ave. - Bmokhurs; St. 0.92 E 52,000 5-lane major arterial South of Brookhurst St. 1.24 F 70,000 6-lane major arterial f ;I Saybrook Lane II Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial I I j ! Slater Avenue Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.14 A 5.000 4-lane secondary arterial { Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.45 A 16.000 4-lane secondary arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.51 A 18.000 4-lane secondary arterial Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.53 A 19.000 4-lane secondary arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.48 A 17.000 4-lane secondary arterial '• j Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial Page 5 1-'JNTINGTCN BEACH GENERAL PLAN Average I V/C Daily Roadway Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification Springdale Street Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.64 B 24,000 4-lane prmary arterial Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.83 C 31,000 4-lane prmary arterial 41,arner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.59 A 22,000 4-lane prmary arterial i veil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.77 C 29.000 4-lane primary arterial Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.72 C 27,000 4-lane prmary arterial McFadden Ave. - Balsa Ave. 0.96 E 36,000 4-lane primary arterial II North of Boisa Ave. 1.17 F 44,000 4-iane P,m.ary arterial ` ;!Talbert Avenue �l i Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.24 A 9,000 4-lane pl;mary arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.35 A 13,000 =-lane primary arterial I, Beach Bwd. - Newland St. 0.48 A 18,000 4-lane primary arterial j Ward Street I Yorktown Ave. - GarSeld Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arteral ; l Warner Avenue iI '! PCH - Algonquin St. 0.62 B 35.000 6-lane najcrarterial Algonquin St. - Balsa Chica St. 0.67 B 38,CCO 6-lane major arterial Boise Chica St. - Graham St. 0.73 C 4t,000 o"-lane mrajorarteHal Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.67 B 38,000 6-lane major arteral Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.53 A 30,000 6-lane major arterial I i� Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.60 B 3 4,000 o'-lane major arterial Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.66 B 37,000 6-lane major arterial I� Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.82 0 46.000 o'-lane major arterial 1 „ Beach Bwd. - Newland St. 0.85 0 48,000 a-lane majcrarterial ';.i Newiand St. - Magnolia St. 1.01 F 57,000 o"-lame major arterial �� Yorktown Avenue I i Goidenwest St. - Main St. 0.77 C 30.000 4-lane arinary arterial Main St. - Lake St. 0.56 A 20.000 4-lane secondary arterial Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial I' Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial it Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial I� Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arterial it Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.766 C 27.000 4-1,ane secondary arterial l Brockhurst St. - Ward St. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial li 17th Street t ' PCH - Orange Ave. 0.29 A 11.000 4-lane primary arterial Orange Ave. - Palm Ave. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial Palm Ave. - Main St. 0.48 A 18,000 4-lane primary arterial I ' Page 6 MEMORANDUM August 28, 1995 Page 8 Table l INTE'RSEC11()N LE?VE?I, O SLRVICE' SUMMARY FOR 1'0.4"1' YPAR 2010 Al:l'1:ItNA'1'IVI:S IIUILD-OUT O MPAll WI'11101,11' MITIGATION Cross Cap Connector Alicrnntivc No thdomicd Ronds Ahernalivc AM Peak I lour I'M Peak hour AM Peak I lour I'M Peak (lour Inlersection V C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS VEC Ratio LOS V C 12alio LOS Ilolsa Ave./Ilolsa Chica St. 0.68 11 0.73 C 0.67 It 0.74 C 110sa Avc./Graham St. 0.38 A 0.55 A 03s A ll.•I'1 �\ Its iha Avc./Spi ingdalc Avc. 0.72 (' 0.77 t' 0.75 r' O 7ti ' Ilolsa Ave./1"dwanls Sl, O,(;g I'i (06 C', 0.6A 11 0,'►1 1: Bolin Ava./Gold( �twe C:�l. Q,k7, !.a .......'0 99 1,>7 Edinger Ave./Ilolsa Chica St. 0.82 D 0.80 C 0.85 1) 0.78 C Edinger Ave./Graham St. 0.49 A 0.53 A 0.49 A 0.52 A Edinger Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.53 A 0.75 C 0.48 A 0.75 C Edinger Ave./rdwards St. 0.44 A 0.74 C 0.41 A 0.75 C 0.41 0.81 D 0.4t►'r Avc./(�oldcnwcsl St. A k1mi-cr Avc./llcach Illvd. 0.71 C 0.82 1) 11.73 (' Il.81 I) Warne r Ave-IPCI t . . O.fSli I')' o:1.,f .:i (.: 11.�)!': I', 0.74 C; Warner �irr /RalstIIICA SI d. G; 1 ': U.9�4 105 1'� MEMORANDUM August 28, 1995 Page 9 TABLE' l (Cont.) Cross Cup Connector Alternative No llaruncted Roads Alternative AM Peak Iluur I'M Peuk (lour AM Prok Ilour I'M I'cnk Iluur lulcrsccli►►n V C Itati!► LOS V/C Ratio LOS V (; Ratio 1.0.", V C Ralil► I.QS Warner Ave./Graham St. 0.52 A 0.62 11 0.57 A 0.75 C Warner Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.57 A O.65 B (OR A 0.67 13 Warner Ave./Edwards St. 0.61 U 0.71 C 0.51) A 0.69 11 Warner Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.72 C O.95 1) 0.72 C 0.95 1) Warner Ave./Ileach Blvd. O.90 C Oa31 1) 0.74 C O.81 1) Slater Ave./Edwards St. 0.62 13 0.62 11 0.63 13 0.61 It Slater Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.7:3 C 0.85 1) 0.61) 13 0.85 1) Slater Ave./Reach Illvd. 0.00 1) 0.,)Il C'� 0.')O 1) o.,)Il l'aIl,crt Avc./11ct►cl► lllvd. --- 0.72 C 0.82 1) 0.09 It 0.8-1 U Ellis Avg:./Peach filvd.' O:G/:. fi 0,94 1. 0.66 11 0.96 V Gnr�cld' 1val uld nvi�c�l'Sl i)��l A f`. p,c} Y' ' 0.48 A 0.811 1 Yurklown Ave./Goldenwest 0.61 11 0.77 C 0.62 It 0.76 C St. Adams Ave./peach lilvd. 0.71 C 0.85 1) 0.71 (' O.HR I) Adams Ave./Magnolia St. 0.61 11 0.114 1) 0.62 11 0.84 D -- mmm■ ..r.� ...W .. wn■i > l� NMI Itww am No im MEMORANDUM August 28, IV)S Page 10 TABLE 1 (Cont.) Cross Cap Connector Alternallve No llnfunded Itonds Allernallve AM Peak Ilour I'M Penk (lour AM Peak Ham- I'M Peak 11mir Intersection V C Italio LOS V C )Zalio LOS V C Italia LOS V C Italic► 1.OS Adams Ave./Brookhurst St. 0.83 D 0.87 D 0.83 D 0.87 D PCII/Goldenwesl St. 0.70 Il 0.70 It 0.69 It 0.70 11 PCII/Beach Blvd. 0.58 A 0.80 C 0.07 It 0.8•1 1) 11C:II/Hroo khursl St. 0.68 11 0.06 It 0.68 It 0.66 It -- Ilrpok)�u l St:(1Y trnill l► Sl, 0.�)( 1; lab C: Q,�11 C.?' 1.02 I: t Level of Service was determined using the intersection operational analysis methodology, as described in Chapter 9 of the 1985 Highway Capacity MaiuraL X Scenario Comparison-Gen Plan Street From To Scenario 1pSceno Scenario 3 Adams I Brookhurst E. City Limit E (0.96) E Beach Yorktown Garfield D (0.85) D Bolsa Chica Rancho Bolsa E (0 99) F Bolsa McFadden D (0.83) D McFadden Edin er D (0.82) D Brookhurst Indianapolis Adams E (0.91) E Adams Yorktown D (0.82) D D Yorktown Garfield E (0.92) E E Edwards j McFadden Bolsa \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ D Ellis I Beach Newland D (0.84) D D Garfield IDelaware Beach D (0.83) D D Beach Newland F (1.07) F F Newland Magnolia D (0.83) \\\\\\\\\\\\\ D Golden West jMcFadden Bolsa \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ E Gothard lWarner Heil D (0.81) jHeil Edinger F (1.12) F E Edin er Center E (0.93) (Center McFadden F (1.35) F F Hamilton I Newland Magnolia D (0.83) D \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Heil IGraham Springdale D (0.84) D D McFadden jEdwards Golden West D (0.81) D NNUM\\\\\\\E Gothard Beach D Orange 117th 6th D (0.81) D D PCH N. Cit Limit Warner F (1.52) F F Warner Seapoint F (1 31) F F I Seapoint Golden West I F (1.15) F F Huntington I Beach D (0.85) D E Beach INewland D Newland IMagnolia I D (0.83) D D Magnolia Brookhurst D (0.87) I D E Brookhurst E. City Limit F (1.19) F F Springdale McFadden Bolsa E (0.96) E E IBolsa N. City Limit F (1.15) F I F Warner I Gothard Beach D (0.82) D D (Beach Newland D (0.83) D D Newland Magnolia I E (0.99) E F Intersections N/S Street EM Street AM/PM LOS Brookhurst Hamilton E/F E/F E/F Beach Ellis B/E B/E B/E Golden West Garfield A/E Bolsa Chica Warner E/E E/E F/F Golden West Bolsa D/E DIE D/F Edwards Bolsa \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ B/E PCH Warner E/C I Indicates acceptable LOS in that scenario. 0014650 01 RPage 1 • City of Huntington Beach Inter-department Communication DATE: October 2, 1995 TO: Jim Otterson, Traffic Engineer Linda Niles, Senior Planner FROM: Bruce Gilmer, Associate Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment; Planning Commission Request Existing and Proposed Lane Configurations The attached listing presents the existing lanes, existing Circulation Element configuration, and proposed Circulation Element configuration for all arterial street segments. Those listed would experience changes because: • New lanes are painted on a fully widened street (Springdale, S/o Slater) • Street is widened and new lanes added (Newland, S/o Hamilton) • Street capacity is insufficient for predicted traffic demand (Adams, E/o Brookhurst) • Existing lane configuration will match new designation (Main, N/o Delaware) These road segments are the ones which will be affected by the proposed Circulation Element where a different number of lanes or classification are shown. Otherwise the street modifications will not change the existing classification of the road segment. 0014793.01 03/25/96 8:23 AIM Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT No. of I No. of SEG , EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES Lanes Classification Lanes Classification 197 17TH MAIN PALM j 2 j 4 1 PRIMARY 198 17TH PALM ORANGE 2 j 4 I PRIMARY 199 17TH ORANGE j PCH 2 4 PRIMARY 75 ADAMS 17th I MAIN ST. I 2 j LOCAL 76 i ADAMS MAIN ST. LAKE j 2 j ! LOCAL I 77 ADAMS LAKE DELAWARE 78 ADAMS DELAWARE BEACH 79 : ADAMS BEACH NEW LAND ! 80 ADAMS NEW LAND MAGNOLIA j 81 ADAMS MAGNOLIA BUSHARD j 82 ADAMS BUSHARD ; BROOKHURST j 83 j ADAMS BROOKHURST I S. A. RIVER j 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 101 ALGONQUIN HEIL WARNER ! 2 j 4 SECONDARY 89 ATLANTA LAKE DELAWARE 2 4 PRIMARY 90 ! ATLANTA DELAWARE BEACH 1 2 j 4 PRIMARY 91 ATLANTA BEACH I NEW LAND 92 1 ATLANTA NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 93 i ATLANTA MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 94 ATLANTA BUSHARD BROOKHURST I 204 ATLANTA 1ST DELAWARE 2 4 PRIMARY 98 BANNING MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 2 1 4 ; SECONDARY ! 2 COLLECTOR 99 BANNING BUSHARD BROOKHURST i 2 4 I SECONDARY ! 2 COLLECTOR 1 BOLSA BOLSA CHICA GRAHAM I. 2 ! BOLSA GRAHAM SPRINGDALE 3I BOLSA SPRINGDALE EDWARDS i 41 BOLSA EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST 102 BOLSA CHICA N CITY LIMIT BOLSA 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 103 BOLSA CHICA BOLSA ARGOSY i 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 104 . BOLSA CHICA �.RGOSY McFADDEN 6 j 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 105 BOLSA CHICA McFADDEN EDINGER 6 j 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 106 BOLSA CHICA EDINGER HEIL j 107 j BOLSA CHICA HEIL WARNER 177 BROOKHURST GARFIELD YORKTOWN 6 6 i MAJOR 8 MAJOR 178 j BROOKHURST YORKTOWN j ADAMS 6 j 6 MAJOR 8 i MAJOR 179 BROOKHURST ADAMS I INDIANAPOLIS j 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 180 BROOKHURST INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA i 181 BROOKHURST ATLANTA HAMILTON I 182 BROOKHURST HAMILTON BANNING 1. 183 BROOKHURST BANNING BUSHARD i 1 184 BROOKHURST BUSHARD PCH 170 BUSHARD GARFIELD YORKTOWN 171 BUSHARD YORKTOWN ADAMS I 172 BUSHARD ADAMS INDIANAPOLIS i Page 1 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT No. of No. of SEG : EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES Lanes , Classification I Lanes I Classification 173 BUSHARD INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA j 174 BUSHARD ATLANTA HAMILTON I 175 BUSHARD HAMILTON I BANNING I 176 BUSHARD BANNING BROOKHURST I i I 11 CENTER GOTHARD RAILROAD 12 CENTER RAILROAD BEACH 186 DELAWARE GARFIELD YORKTOWN 1 2 1 4 SECONDARY I 187 DELAWARE YORKTOWN ADAMS 2 4 1 SECONDARY 188 . DELAWARE ADAMS INDIANAPOLIS 2 I 4 SECONDARY I 189 DELAWARE INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA ! 2 4 ! SECONDARY ! 13 EDINGER W CITY LIMIT SAYBROOK 2 4 PRIMARY 14 : EDINGER SAYBROOK BOLSA CHICA 15 EDINGER BOLSA CHICA GRAHAM 1 16 EDINGER GRAHAM i SPRINGDALE 17 EDINGER SPRINGDALE ! EDWARDS 18 EDINGER EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST ! 19 EDINGER GOLDEN WEST G. W. COLLEGE 20 EDINGER G. W. COLLEGE I GOTHARD j 21 EDINGER GOTHARDS WARDS 22 EDINGER WARDS SHER 23 . EDINGER SHER PARKSIDE 24 EDINGER PARKSIDE BEACH 1 j 25 EDINGER BEACH NEW LAND 122 EDWARDS N CITY LIMIT BOLSA 123 EDWARDS BOLSA McFADDEN 1 124 EDWARDS McFADDEN EDINGER j 125 EDWARDS EDINGER HEIL 1 i 126 EDWARDS HEIL WARNER Ij 127 EDWARDS WARNER SLATER 128 EDWARDS SLATER ELLIS 2 ! 4 SECONDARY I 129 EDWARDS ELLIS GARFIELD 55 ELLIS EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST 2 4 ! SECONDARY :;. 1 56 ELLIS GOLDEN WEST : GOTHARD 57 ELLIS GOTHARD MAIN ST. 2 1 4 I SECONDARY 1 58 ELLIS BEACH I NEW LAND 59 GARFIELD EDWARDS ; GOLDEN WEST . ! I 60 GARFIELD GOLDEN WEST MAIN ST. 4 i 6 MAJOR 61 GARFIELD MAIN ST. BEACH 4 4 PRIMARY j 6 MAJOR 62 GARFIELD BEACH NEW LAND 4 4 PRIMARY 6 i MAJOR 63 GARFIELD NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 4 I 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 64 GARFIELD MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 65 GARFIELD BUSHARD BROOKHURST 1 66 GARFIELD BROOKHURST WARD 2 I 4 PRIMARY Page 2 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT I No. of No. of 1 SEG EXISTING j Thru 1 Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES j Lanes ! Classification Lanes Classification 130 GOLDEN WEST: BOLSA McFADDEN 131 GOLDEN WEST McFADDEN EDINGER 132 GOLDEN WEST EDINGER HBL i 133 GOLDEN WEST:! HEIL NORMA/LYDIA 134 GOLDEN WEST; NORMA/LYDIA WARNER j 135 GOLDEN WEST; WARNER SLATER 5 6 i MAJOR i 136 GOLDEN WEST 1 SLATER TALBERT j 137 GOLDEN WEST; TALBERT ELLIS I 138 GOLDEN WEST: ELLIS i GARFIELD 4 6 MAJOR I 139 GOLDEN WEST: GARFIELD YORKTOWN 4 1 6 ! MAJOR 1 140 GOLDEN WEST. YORKTOWN I PALM j 141 GOLDEN WEST. PALM PCH 142 GOTHARD McFADDEN CENTER 4 4 PRIMARY i 6 MAJOR 143 GOTHARD CENTER EDINGER 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 144 GOTHARD EDINGER HEIL 4 4 PRIMARY i 6 1 MAJOR 145 GOTHARD HEIL WARNER 4 1 4 : SECONDARY-1 4 I PRIMARY 146 GOTHARD WARNER SLATER 147 GOTHARD SLATER TALBERT 1 148 GOTHARD TALBERT ELLIS 2 i 4 ! SECONDARY ,' 1 148 GOTHARD ELLIS MAIN ST. I 108 GRAHAM BOLSA McFADDEN i 109 GRAHAM McFADDEN EDINGER 110 GRAHAM EDINGER HEIL 2 4 1 SECONDARY 1 111 GRAHAM HEIL WARNER 2 4 ': SECONDARY ' 112 GRAHAM WARNER SLATER 2 4 ; SECONDARY I 95 HAMILTON NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 2 j 4 PRIMARY 96 HAMILTON MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 97 HAMILTON BUSHARD i BROOKHURST 1 I 26 HEIL SAYBROOK ALGONQUIN I 27 HEIL ALGONQUIN BOLSA CHICA 2 4 SECONDARY ' 28 HEIL BOLSA CHICA i GRAHAM 29 HEIL GRAHAM SPRINGDALE 30 HEIL SPRINGDALE 1 EDWARDS 31 HEIL EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST :. 32 HEIL GOLDEN WEST GOTHARD 33 HEIL GOTHARD BEACH 2 4 ISECONDARY1 I 34 HEIL BEACH NEW LAND 2 4 j SECONDARY1 1 84 INDIANAPOLIS LAKE BEACH 2 1 4 j SECONDARY 1 j 85 INDIANAPOLIS BEACH NEWLAND 2 i 4 I SECONDARY 1 86 INDIANAPOLIS NEW LAND MAGNOLIA j 87 INDIANAPOLIS MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 88 INDIANAPOLIS BUSHARD BROOKHURST f 1 195 LAKE YORKTOWN ADAMS 2 4 SECONDARY Page 3 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED ! CIRCULATION CIRCULATION I ; ELEMENT ELEMENT No. of No. of SEG I EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO I LANES Lanes ;' Classification Lanes Classification 162 1 MAGNOLIA 405 FWY WARNER 1 163 j MAGNOLIA GARFIELD YORKTOWN I I 164 MAGNOLIA YORKTOWN ADAMS 165 I MAGNOLIA ADAMS 1 INDIANAPOLIS I i 166 I MAGNOLIA INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA j ! 167 i MAGNOLIA j ATLANTA HAMILTON i 1681 MAGNOLIA HAMILTON BANNING I 169 ! MAGNOLIA BANNING PCH i 190 1 MAIN ELLIS GARFIELD 1 6,4 I 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 191 I MAIN GARFIELD YORKTOWN I 192 ' MAIN YORKTOWN 17th i ! 193 MAIN 17th ADAMS j 5 McFADDEN BOLSA CHICA GRAHAM I I I 6 ! McFADDEN i GRAHAM SPRINGDALE 1 7 McFADDEN SPRINGDALE EDWARDS j I 8 I McFADDEN EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST I 4 1 4 I SECONDARY i 4 PRIMARY 9 McFADDEN GOLDEN WEST i GOTHARD 1 ! 10 ; McFADDEN GOTHARD BEACH 2 ! 4 i SECONDARY 150 ! NEWLAND I EDINGER HEIL I 2 I 4 1 SECONDARY ! 151 NEWLAND HEIL WARNER 1 152 i NEWLAND WARNER SLATER 3 ! 4 SECONDARY 153 NEWLAND SLATER TALBERT 1 1 154 j NEWLAND I TALBERT ELLIS 155 NEWLAND ELLIS GARFIELD 156 ! NEWLAND GARFIELD YORKTOWN I 1571 NEWLAND YORKTOWN ADAMS ! 158 NEWLAND ADAMS INDIANAPOLIS 1 2 1 4 1 SECONDARY 159 NEWLAND i INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA 160 1 NEWLAND ! ATLANTA HAMILTON 2 1 4 ! SECONDARY ! 161 NEWLAND HAMILTON PCH 2 4 :: SECONDARY ' 2011 ORANGE GOLDEN WEST 17TH 2 j 4 SECONDARY j 2 COLLECTOR 2021 ORANGE 17TH 6TH 1 2 j 4 SECONDARY ! 2 COLLECTOR 203' ORANGE 6TH 1ST 2 1 4 SECONDARY 1 2 COLLECTOR 196 I PALM SEAPOINT GOLDEN WEST 1 I 2001 PALM GOLDEN WEST 17th I 2 4 SECONDARY !; 2 COLLECTOR 194 PARKSIDE ALDRICH EDINGER I 1 I 100 SAYBROOK ! EDINGER HEIL 2 4 ` SECONDARY I 205j SEAPOINT GARFIELD PALM I j 2061 SEAPOINT PALM PCH I 46 ; SLATER GRAHAM SPRINGDALE I 2 i 4 i SECONDARY 1 47 j SLATER SPRINGDALE EDWARDS I 48 1 SLATER EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST ! 49 ! SLATER GOLDEN WEST GOTHARID Page 4 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED I CIRCULATION ` CIRCULATION j ELEMENT I ELEMENT 1 No. of 1 No. of SEG! EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM ! TO LANES Lanes Classification I Lanes • Classification 50 SLATER GOTHARD BEACH I 51 I SLATER BEACH NEW LAND j 113 I SPRINGDALE N CITY LIMIT I SKYLAB j 4 4 PRIMARY ! 6 MAJOR 114 SPRINGDALE SKYLAB BOLSA 4 4 j PRIMARY j 6 MAJOR 115 SPRINGDALE BOLSA i McFADDEN ; 4 4 ! PRIMARY j 6 ! MAJOR 116 ; SPRINGDALE McFADDEN MARINA HIGH 117 1 SPRINGDALE MARINA HIGH I EDINGER j I 1181 SPRINGDALE EDINGER HEIL 119I SPRINGDALE HEIL ! WARNER 120 j SPRINGDALE WARNER SLATER j 121 SPRINGDALE SLATER TALBERT 2 4 PRIMARY 52 TALBERT GOLDEN WEST i GOTHARD I ! 53 TALBERT GOTHARD BEACH I 2 j 4 1 PRIMARY 54 TALBERT BEACH I NEW LAND 185 ! WARD GARFIELD YORKTOWN j 2 I 4 ! SECONDARY ! 35 i WARNER PCH ALGONQUIN 4 6 I MAJOR ! 8 MAJOR 36 ; WARNER ALGONQUIN BOLSA CHICA I I I 37 1 WARNER BOLSA CHICA ! GRAHAM 38 WARNER GRAHAM SPRINGDALE 39 j WARNER SPRINGDALE EDWARDS I I 40 WARNER EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST ! ! 41 WARNER GOLDEN WEST ! GOTHARD 421 WARNER GOTHARD NICHOLS i 6 j 6 1 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 43 I WARNER NICHOLS BEACH 6 j 6 1 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 44 WARNER BEACH NEW LAND 6 I 6 I MAJOR i 8 ! MAJOR 45 ; WARNER NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 6 I 6 j MAJOR j 8 MAJOR 67 YORKTOWN GOLDEN WEST : MAIN ST. 1 4 4 SECONDARY j 4 PRIMARY 68 1 YORKTOWN MAIN ST. DELAWARE ! ! 691 YORKTOWN DELAWARE BEACH I 70 YORKTOWN BEACH NEW LAND 71 YORKTOWN NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 72 YORKTOWN MAGNOLIA BUSHARD ! i 73 1 YORKTOWN BUSHARD BROOKHURST i 741 YORKTOWN BROOKHURST WARD I Page 5 J. 111a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2 0 0 0 M a i n S t r e e t P . 0 . B o x 1 9 0 C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 6 4 8 Les M. Jones II Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 December 12, 1995 Mr. John F. Scott 22032 Capistrano Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Subject: Letter to Steve Holden dated 11/27/95 Response to Concerns Dear Mr. Scott: We have received a copy of your letter to Planning Commissioner Holden of November 27, 1995, regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the General Plan Amendment. This response is provided to clarify the few substantive issues contained in your letter. The responses to items 1-8, 1-9 and 1-10 (13-176,177) discuss fully the validation and parameters of modeling efforts for the traffic model used in this General Plan process. Your comments regarding National Cooperative Highway Research Project (NCHRP) Report No. 255 parameters are also addressed in those responses. Staff efforts to provide information and explanation for your use have been extensive. You have been provided with all of the traffic count information you have requested (a complete copy of the city's traffic count database), yet you accuse city staff of hiding information. This assertion is simply not true. Traffic count data demonstrates that there are wide fluctuations in vehicular traffic at specific locations in the city. Still, you avoid mentioning that fact, or the obvious conclusions to be drawn from it, i.e., that no single value in the model can be expected to replicate a "snap shot" traffic count taken on the street. I will take this opportunity to correct errors in the information you submitted in your letter dated September 4, 1995. In reviewing the data, I limited the analysis to the screenlines which affect the Huntington Beach area, and for which traffic count data could be used in place of values on the OCEMA now map. The following corrections are submitted for your information and review: Pa. 13-163 "Correlation Between Modeled and Measured Traffic Counts" In performing this analysis, you did not perform a fundamental step, i.e., disaggregating (separating) the different facility types (freeway, major and minor arterials). Consequently, your calculated results are not valid. When the data is correctly analyzed (via disaggregation), the value of r exceeds 0 99 for Screenlines 1, 2, 3, and 8, and exceeds 0.90 for Screenlines 4 and 7. All exceed the recommended minimum of r= 0.88. Please see the attached Data Summary sheet and screenline location map. pa. 13-169 -Comparison of Model vs Measured Mean" This calculation is not appropriate for measuring the validity of a multiple element data set. It is properly used to measure the accuracy of several measurements against one predicted value. The claim of bias in the model is not supported by use of this calculation. I would also point out the t value at the 95% confidence level is 1.960. not 1.645 as shown as "the z value, from statistical tables" in your 9/4/95 letter. The t values quoted are contained in Table A-3, page 199 of the Manual of Traffic Enoineerina Studies, 4th Edition, Box & Oppenlanden. I have attached a copy of this page for your reference. The correct use of Table A-3 would be to use the degrees of freedom value for the number of actual counts taken at one specific location for comparison to the predicted model value at that location. pa. 13-173 -Confidence Interval for Measured vs Model Data" The Confidence Interval was reviewed using surface street data (freeways were not included). The results are shown on the attached sheet titled "Data Summary" and indicate that the surface street model predictions fall well within the limits of the calculated interval. Therefore, no bias or skewing of data elements is demonstrated. pg. 13-174 "Comparison of Model vs. Measured Data Variance"As noted above, the streets were not separated by category (disaggregated) and therefore any calculations of variance which lumps all of the data together without regard to the classification of the street is invalid. Further, I would point out the recommended variance that is acceptable for each type of facility differs according to the ability of the model to predict those values. For example, an acceptable variance of seven percent (7%) for Freeways is less that the ten percent (10%) designated for Principal Arterials. This is consistent with the ability of the model to assign traffic to major flow arterial streets more accurately than to low volume roads. The attached Data Summary sheet shows the variance for each type of facility across each screenline examined. Thirteen of the fifteen values are well within the `Suggested Deviation" values of CALTRANS. In an effort to demonstrate that the model data represents a valid picture of existing conditions as defined in NCHRP 255, 1 replaced all of the "count" values (taken from OCEMA's 1990/91 Flow Map) with the actual count data taken in 1988 and 1989. When that is done, the variance for Screenline No. 2 is 2.89%, compared to the - 0.9% shown on page 13-178 of the responses. The value of 2.89 % is still significantly less than the allowed 10% as specified in NCHRP 255, and indicates that the model is performing well within accepted parameters. The fourth paragraph on page 2 of your letter poses an interesting question: Why wasn't data acquired in 1993 used in a 1991 modeling validation effort? I believe that the answer is obvious: the data collected in 1993 did not exist in 1991. 1 believe the efforts of city staff to respond to your inquiries and concerns have been complete and thorough. I consider this matter closed. Sincerely, ames D. Otterson, P.E., P.L.S. Traffic Engineer JDO/BHG/bg cc: Members of the Planning Commission Linda Niles, Senior Planner Bruce Gilmer, Associate Traffic Engineer Carlton Waters, P.E., Robert Kahn, John Kain &Associates Doug Smith, P.E., DKS Associates Attachments: Data Summary Screenline Map Table A-3, pg. 199, Manual of Traffic Engineering Studies, 4th Edition DATA SUMMARY SARA Model Validation Data Analysis Free ay Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Screenline Suggested Suggested Suggested No. % Deviation Deviation % Deviation Deviation % Deviation Deviation R Value 1 -2.38298 7.00000 7.64352 10.00000 -6.39900 15.00000 0.997135 2 5.97095 7.00000 0.92550 10.00000 -2.59335 15.00000 0.995539 3 5.93525 7.00000 -1.16071 10.00000 NONE 1 0.999961 4 NONE 9.904531 10.00000 -10.252371 15.00000 0.933743 5 Not in Huntington Beach Area 5a Not in Huntington Beach Area 6 Not in Huntin ton Beach Area 7 NONE 5.50 11131 10.00000 >> 2 A69041 15.00050 0.907395 8 T 754241 7.000001 0.936391 10.000001 6.000001 15.00000 0.998229 9 Not in Huntington Beach Area 10 Not in Huntington Beach Area 11 Not in Huntington Beach Area I Overall Correlation r= 0.99348286 r=1 0.993482861 r A 2 = 0.98700818 Mean of Counts<200k 1 23.4333333 Confidence Range (95%) 1 2.82321926 Confidence Interval 120.6101141 < µ < 26.25655261 I Mean of Predictions<200k 24.2515152 Page 1 0015954.01 LOCH I 1urvZ3 4 .sw..... I0 •1 _ - '��' • -- it n 1. / LEGEND: •� lO e Q7 - SCREENEINE NUMBER SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSINGS o<< COOPERATIVE STUDY �'•� Orange County, California EXHIBIT P 5 1__ Robert Kehn, John Kein __ l z Table A-3 as 41.6 < . < -_0. Thai is. the population Table of t Values mean of the spot speeds is expected to t Degrees o1 Level of a be contained in the interval from 41.6 to Freedom 0.10 0.05 0.01 43.0 mph with a confidence that is equal to 95 percent ` 1 6.314 12.706 63.657 This interval is the measure of pre- 2 2.920 4.303 9.925 3 2.353 3.182 5.841 cision of the sample. assuming that ;he 4 2.132 2.776 4.604 selection is random and unbiased. It the 5 2.015 2.571 4.032 sample error is too farce, then more ob- servations shouid be obtained, making 6 1.543 2.447 3.707 certain, of co::-se, that conditions have i 1695 2.365 3.499 not changed si. a ;he original observe- . , - Lions were rnade. 8 1.860 2.306 3.355 f 9 1.833 2.262 3.250 When a study is made in which the 10 1.8 i 2 2.228 3.1 i:9 result is expresse_t as a proportion or a percentage, the precision of the estimate 11 1.796 2.201 3.106 is indicated by the 1--flowing inequality: 12 1.782 2.179 3.055 pt. pg < p < r - t. pg 13 1.771 2.160 3.012 V N ,A-71 41 14 1.761 2.145 2.977 15 1.753 2.131 2.S4i where P = p-opor-oon of the population p = prcper,ion of the sample 15 1.746 2.120 2.921 4=stans,,I cf the t distribution 17 1.740 2.110 2.c=o 16 1.734 2.101 2.878 for (r. - 1) degrees of 19 1.729 2.093 2.851 free�o rr, and the pro:ability 20 1.725 2.086 2.8=5 cefine: -v the subscript a N = -urr,ber of observations 21 1.721 2.080 2.531 •- 1.0 - cc-,fide,)ce coefficient 22 1.717 2.074 2.619 The term ( �?` ) is ccfined as the stand- `- 23 1.714 2.069 2.807 N ' 24 1.711 2.064 2.797 and error of t`e es:;-,ate for the prcpor- �' 2c 1.708 2.060 2.7c7 tion. Typical values cf the t statistic are obtained from Tabie -3 for the various 26 1.706 2.056 2.779 degrees of feed,n and for selected 27 1.703 2.052 2.771 levels of a. T-e Ce:ermination of the 28 1.701 2.048 2.7c3 sample precis�cn fir prcpertions or per- 29 1.699 2.045 2.756 centages is very sirni'ar in procedure and 30 1.697 2.042 2.750 interpretation to the previously discussed situation for t`e rnear, of a sample. 40 1.684 2.021 2.704 As an exa'n,-e cf a percentace esti- 60 1.671 2.000 2.660 mate. 400 drivc-s were randomly sampled 120 1.658 1.980 2 617 in regard to their location of employment, 1.645 1.960 2 576 and 120 ors0 recce-, reported that they _ worked in the cr+: town area. The term r1 Table R-3. Typical values of the i s:o:isnc are r1is ca�cu!a:e: as 30 - 70 J presen,,ed in this :able for var,ovs ce=rees of Ct.�� t 960\00 r� freedom and for selected !eve!s of cor;:.cence. Such a :pole is useful in stueyin_ anc es -a:- or 4.5 percent as :`e precision cf the de'•ees of error in cena,n :c2:f.c en; -eer- ^° ing studies. percentage est,-a:e :cr a confidence Co- s Js John F. Scott 22032 Capistrano Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92646.8309 Telephone(714)962-1746 Fax(714)962J416 November 27, 1995 1���� 2g ,g95 RECEIVED Mr. Steve Holden TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Planning Commissioner DEC - 1 1995 City of Huntington Beach 200 Main Street LHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Holden: Staff was not responsive to the concerns we expressed regarding the DEIR for the General Plan Update. A fact we will show in this letter. The larger issue, larger than the modeling process shortcomings we have pointed out in our comments, is the competency of our City Government. Staffs comments demonstrate that they do not understand the issues that we raised regarding problems with the modeling process. This is hardly surprising, as they are the source of the problems about which we have written in our DEIR comments. It is the responsibility ofthe appointed and elected leaders, your responsibility, to ensure that government is fulfilling its functions competently. In the present case that means that it is your responsibility to thoroughly review the issues, even though they involve modeling, statistics, and other technical matters. Failure to do so is an abrogation of your responsibility -- much as the County's leaders failed in their responsibility to monitor Mr. Citron. Our DEIR comments are based upon the modeling maxim of"garbage in; garbage out". This means simply that if the input data is not good, the results can't be good either. This is a matter of common sense. No matter how good the modeling software. no matter how diliQently one tries, no matter how many credentials the practioner has, the results are no better than the inputs. As we have shown in our comments to the DEIR, the inputs to the model are unreliable. Staffs response to our DEIR comments was NON RESPONSIVE. In the second paragraph of our comments we state, in essence, our concern with the quality of the input data. We further state that the poor quality of the input data raises questions (CEQA 15148 and 15 15 1) about the DEIR. As we noted in this paragraph the details were provided in subsequent paragraphs. In Staffs response to, labels I3, 11 l, I12, 113, 114, I15 and I16, we find the phrase "The comment does not pertain to the content of the DEIR, therefore, no substantive response is required". Clearly, to anyone bothering to read our second paragraph, this is just not true. Staff has chosen to duck the issues rather than respond quantitatively as demanded by CEQA. This is obviously non responsive. "The principle of science, the definition, almost is the following: <The test of all knowledge is experiment [put in italics and remove the symbols "<[]>"]>. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific 'truth'." This quote is from Nobel Laureate, Richard Feynman in his work "Lectures on Physics". Engineering also follows the principles of science about which Mr. Feynman speaks. After two years of effort, we are unable to find the source of the measured (i.e. experimental) data that is used to verify the traffic model The source of the column labeled "COUNTED ADT VOLL-QN1--E" of the data on page 13-1 78 of Staffs rtsponse to DEIR comments couldn't be less clear Let us focus on a single table entry, which is Edineer Ave at screenline , according to the table on 13-178 the "COUNTED ADT VOLUME" is 31,000. But, according to traffic count data provided by the City Staff, the measured data for Edinger at that location is 22,568 as shown on page 13-155. Which is it? Both numbers can't be correct. According to Feynman, measured data takes precedence. The essence of our concern is that Staff prefers the other number -- the one which is not measured. The issue couldn't be more clear. Either Staff has data which they've not shared with City Residents or, Staff prefers to use values, concocted in some way known only to them, in preference to measured data. We believe that you should ask Staff if they can provide you with the source of measured data for each and every value of the "COUNTED ADT VOLUME" on page 13-155. If they do not have measured data for this column, then you must ask for the source of the data and on what basis they have chosen such data over actual measured data. We must point out another disingenuous response by Staff to our concerns. In the response to one of our comments, labeled 18, on page 13-1 76, Staff asserts that the model is validated to NCHRP-255. When we look at page 41 of the NCHRP-255 (page 13-171 in the DEIR response), we see a test for comparing simulated (i.e. modeled) data to actual base year traffic data. We did this and find a correlation far outside of that specified by the standard. Rather than address the issue -- the model does not represent measured data in any acceptable way for the base year— Star waves their arms and hides behind assertions of"suggested" and "desirable". It seems to us that if it is desirable and cheap to do such a test, it should be done. If, when done, disagreements between the model and base year traffic count data are substantial, then corrective measures must be undertaken. Let us look at the response, labeled 13, to our comment on page 13-147. This is a question which goes right to the heart of the matter. According to the data provided by Staff, traffic volumes in the City rose 50.78% IN 01\TE, YEAR. Then in the next 8 years they rose only 1.84%. This is a very clear indication that something is wrong with the measured data. The data just doesn't ring true. Staffs response is that we didn't use this prior data, and therefore this is not a substantive comment. As the last year in that string was 1993, we assume some of the 1993 data was input into the model. If our assumption is not correct,just what data was used? If our assumption is correct, then such data is suspect because it is part of a clearly suspicious string of data. This demands a response other than it is not relevant. We have raised very serious questions that Mr. Otterson needs to answer. You would be derelict in you duties as a Planning Commissioner if you signed off on the Draft General Plan without substantive responses to these questions. We don't see how anyone looking at the problems with the input data can seriously ai gue that the results of the traffic model presented in the DEIR can be accurate. This is the issue of the competency of government we've raised. It is your duty to get to the bottom of this, and to ensure that reliable input data is used for the traffic studies used in the DEIR. In the meantime, you should not accept this DEIR because it doesn't meet the standards of CEQA 15151 and 15148 as we stated in our original comments. Respectfully, Michael Mott John F. Scott cc: Tom Harmon Trip Generation Changes- GPA Chart 4 GPAC vs Planning Comm. Trip Generation 35,000 30,000 -- --- --------------- ----- -... 25,000 ----- - - - --- - ----- --- -- - - ---..._.... 0.000 --- --- -- --- ------ --- -- - - -._.._.. ... Y Y a a C =15,000 --- - - — ----- ------ -— - -- - 10.000 -- -- -- - --- ------- 5.000 0 Gpp pp pp up a) N qq {� Q QQ pvp 1� 1p tp tp pp pp 0 N N N TAZ No. ■GPAC TOTAL— _ ®PC TOTAL Page 1 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 34 337 204 204 277 17.75 25 1 443 277 3,809 2,382 (1,427) 33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 _ 165 _ 165 _1,419 1,419 - _0 33 352 827 827 2.76 0.35 0.35 42.07896 42 2,103 2,103 0 51 363 204 817 1.03 15 0.35 -15 16 129 549 420 83 374 827 827 4.14 0.5 0.5 90.1692 90 4,508 4,508 0 35 375 204 202 297 23.6 _ 25 1 -- _ 590 297 _ 5,074_ _ __ 21910 _ (2,164) 35 375 811 811 6 1.5 1.5 _- 392.04 _ _392 -_1_6,073___- _1_6,073 - 0 36 378 204 202 213 19.8 25 1 _ 495 __213_ 4,257 2_.087_ (2_,170) 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 _- _ 0 36 379 204 202 51 3.6 _- _ 25 _- 1 _- 90 -- _51 - 774- _499 (275) 36 379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6,860 6,860 0 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 3,268 2,146 (1,122) 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 17,681 17,681 0 86 381 825 110 ---3.264 -- -_-_0.35 _0.5 - 49.762944 71 3,483 924 (2,559) 385 204 200 ------ ---5.47 - --15 --- 7 ------------82 _..... - ---38 - ------- ..70.5 -..- - . .456 _ (249) 40 387 204 817 2.77 15 0.35 41 42 352 1,478 1,126 41 387 204 817 2.2 30 0.35 66 34 567 1,173 606 41 390 204 817 4 30 0.35 120 61 1,032 2,134 1,102 37 391 204 202 66 4.62 25 1 115 66 989 646 (343) 37 391 825 825 1.98 1.5 1.5 129.3732 129 9,056 9,056 0 41 391 204 817 7 30 0.35 210 107 1,806 3,735 1,929 41 392 204 817 7.7 30 0.35 231 117 1,986 4,108 2.122 75 398 811 931 1.22 0.35 1 18.60012 53 762 0 (762) 19 404 204 200 73.37 15 7 1100 513 9,460 6,156 (3,304) 78 415 200 931 2.86 6.5 1 18 125 216 1 (215) 82 426 200 200 48 6.5 4 312 192 3,744 2,304 (1,440) 81 435 200 200 _ 160 6.5 _ 3 _ _ 1_0_40 480 12,48_0 _ _5,7_60 (6,720) 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 _ _ 1_68 _ 168 1,444 _1,444 0 16 441 811 811 2.4 1 _ _1 104.544 _ _ 105 4,286 _ 4,286_ 0 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 0.5 1 71.08992 106 4,976 3,695 (1,281) 72 441 825 202 49 1.632 0_5 1 24_5 - 49 - 1,715 - 480 --(1,235) 89 444 200 931 0.43 _ 0.43 6.5 1 2 0_ 24 _ _ 0 (24) 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 23 447 204 204 82.5 - 11 11 _ _907 _- 907 7,800 _ 7,800 0 23 447 811 811 0 0.35 0.35 0 0 0 0 0 Sorted on TAZ & PC LUC Page 1 0017842 01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 23 448 204 204 76.23 11 11 838 838 7,206 7,206 0 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 0.35 76.23 76 10,291 10,291 0 70 457 204 110 4.1 15 0.5 ' 61 89 524 1.160 636 43 458 204 202 7 25 15 175 105 1.505 1.029 (476) 44 458 204 202 7.1 30 15 213 106 1.831 1.038 (793) 88 458 204 825 1.92 30 0.35 57 29 490 2,049 1,559 46 460 204 202 7.64 30 15 229 114 1,969 1,117 (852) 47 460 204 202 0.01 30 15 0 0 0 _ 0 0 48 460 204 202 1.97 30 15 - 59 _- 29 507 - 284 (223) 49 460 204 202 _-- - 1.13 _ 30 15 33 16 _ 283 156 (127) .-..... ----- ------ ---.....- 64 463 822 204 2.01 0.35 25 30.64446 50 4,137 430 _ (3,707) 58 468 204 825 1.46 25 0.35 36 22 309 1,558 11249 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 14 14 120 120 0 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 0.35 5 3 43 117 74 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 113 67 971 656 (315) 95 473 817 200 6.95 0.35 7 105.9597 48 3,708 576 (3,132) 95 473 200 200 6.95 6.5 7 45 48 540 576 36 87 475 204 825 - 12.57 - 30 0.35 - 377 192 3,242 13,414 10,172 55 480 204 200 30.61 15 _ 7 459 _ 214 -- 3,947 _-2,568 (1,379) 56 480 204 825 _0.55 _ 15 0.35 8 8 _ 68_ _ 586_ _ _ 518 6 487 817 817 0.61 0.35 0.35 9.30006 9 325 325 0 52 489 822 200 1.03 0.35 7 -15.70338 -_- 7 -- 2,119 84 (2,035) 53 494 200 931 10.41 6.5 1 67 453 804 4 (800) 57 495 204 202 7.31 30 1.5 219 109 1,883 1.068 (815) 90 495 817 931 - 20.8 0.5 1 453.024 906 15,855 9 - ....._..... _.-- - ------ - (15,846) 90 495 204 931 41.8 25 1 1045 -- 1,821 8,987 18 (8,969) 93 495 110 931 16.37 0.5 1 356.5386 713 4,635 7 (4,628) 53 498 200 931 56.28 6.5 1 365 2,452 4,380 24 (4,356) 2 499 204 200 2.587 30 7 77 18 662 216 (446) 50 499 822 202 2.71 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5,577 392 (5,185) 78 ----.511 --200 ---931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 _. . _.. (323) 78 514 200 931 -_ 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 1 (323) 82 520 - 200 931 _ 16 6.5 - - - 1 104 697 1,248 6 (1,242) NET TRIPS (59,737) Sorted on TAZ 8, PC LUC Page 2 0017842 01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 2 499 204 200 2.587 30 7 77 18 662 -- -216 - (446) 6 487 817 817 0.61 0.35 0.35 9.30006 9 325 325 0 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 168 168 1,444 1,444 0 16 441 811 811 2.4 1 1 104.544 105 4.286 4,286 0 19 404 204 200 73.37 15 7 1100 513 9.460 6.156 (3,304) ----.. - _.. --- --- - --- - ....... - -... _. 23 447 204 204 82.5 11 11 907 907 7.800 7,800 0 23 447 811 811 0 0.35 0.35 0 0 0 0 0 23 448 204 204 _ 76.23 _11 11 - _ 838 ---8_38 _- - 7,206_ _- 7,206 - 0 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 0.35 76.23 76 - 10,291 -10,291 0 24 385 204 200 5.47 _ 15 - - - 7 82 38 705 456 (249) 33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 165 165 1.419 1.419 0 33 352 827 827 2.76 0.35 0.35 42.07896 42 2,103 2.103 0 34 337 204 204 277 1775 25 - 1 __-443 _ - 277 _-_ 3,809 - 2,382 - (1,427) 35 375 204 202 297 23.6 25 1 590 297 5,074 2.910 (2,164) -------- 5 8._1..-1 -811------ ._. --- --- ..._....._1.5_ --- 1_. 35 37 6 .5 392.04 392 16,073 16,073 0 36 378 204 202 213 19.8 25 1 495 213 4.257 2,087 (2,170) 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 0 36 379 204 202 51 3.6 25 1 - 90 51 774 499 (275) 36 379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6,860 6,860 0 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 3,268 2.146 (1,122) 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 17,681 17.681 0 37 391 204 202 66 4.62 25 1 115 66 989 646 (343) 37 391 825 825 --- 1.98 1.5 - 15 - 129.3732 -_ 129 9,056 9.056 0 40 387 204 817 - -2_77 -__- - 15 -_ - 0.35 - 41 42 352 1.478 1,126 41 387 204 817 2.2 -- 30 - --- 0.35 - -- -- --66 34 567 1,173 606 41 390 204 817 4 _ 30 _-- 0.35 - -120 - - 61 1,032 2,134 1.102 41 391 204 817 - 7 30 - 0.35 -- 210 --107 - 1,806 3,735 1.929 41 392 204 817 --_- 7.7 _ 30 0.35 231 117 -- 1.986 4,108 2,122 43 458 204 202 7 25 15 175 105 1.505 1,029 (476) 44 458 204 202 -- _ _- 7.1 _-- 30 15 213 . 106 1,831 1,038 (793) ---------- 46 460 204 202 --_- -7 64 - 30 ___ 15 -- 229 114 _ 1,969 1,117 (852) 47 460 _ 204 202 -- - - 0.01 ----- -30 ....._....__ 1..5 - ---0 _ 0- 0 . . . 0 0 -- . . 48 460 __-204 202 .-__-_- _ - _1.97 _ -_ _ - . 30 - 15 59 29 507 284 (223) - 49 460 204 202 ---1._13 --- -30 - ---- 15 - - -- -33 --- - 1.6.. ...-- 283 ---- 1-56 - (127) 50 499 822 202 2.71 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5,577 392 (5,185) o8T Z Pa e3 001784201 Sorted on Item N A 9 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 51 363 204 817 1.03 15 0.35 15 16 129 549 420 52 489 822 200 1.03 0.35 7 15.70338 7 2,119 84 _ (2,035) 53 494 200 931 10.41 6.5 1 --- 67 - 453 -- 804 - -- 4 (800) 53 498 200 931 56.28 6.5 1 365 2,452 4,380 24 (4,356) 55 480 204 200 30.61 15 7 459 214 3,947 2,568 (1,379) 56 480 204 825 0.55 15 0.35 8 8 68 586 518 57 495 204 202 7.31 30 -15 - ---219 - - -109 --_- 1,883 - -1,068- -- - (815) 58 468 204 825 - 1.46 25 -- -0.35 _ 36 -- 22 _ _-_ - _3.09 _ 1,558 _- 1,249 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 14 14 120 120 0 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 0.35 5 3 43 117 74 64 463 822 204 2.01 0.35 25 30.64446 50 4,137 430 (3,707) 70 457 204 110 4.1 15 0.5 61 89 524 1,160 636 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 0.5 I 71.08992 106 4,976 3.695 (1.281) 72 441 825 202 49 1.632 0.5 1 24.5 49 1,715 480 (1,235) ---.. --- ------2---- -- .....----- - -- - -- ---....._ 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 113 67 971 656 (315) 75 398 811 931 1.22 0.35 1 18.60012 53 - 762 0 (762) 78 415 200 931 2.86 6.5 1 18 125 216 1 (215) 78 511 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 1 (323) 78 514 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 1 (323) 81 435 200 200 - 160 6.5 3 -- 1040 _ 480 _ - 12,480 5,7_60 _ (6,720) 82 426 200 200 48 _ 6.5 _ 4 312 192 __ 3,744_ _ 2,304 82 520 200 931 _ 16 6.5 _1 _- 104 697 1,248_ 6 (1,242) 83 374 827 827 4.14 0.5 0.5 - 90.1692 90 4,508 4,508 0 86 381 825 110 - 3.264 - 0.35 - 0.5 - 49_762944 71 3,483 924 (2,559) 87 475 204 825 12.57 30 0.35 _ - -377 - 192 3,242 13,414 10,172 88 458 204 825 1.92 30 0.35 57 --2-9 490 2,049 1,559 89 444 200 931 0.43 - 0.43 6.5 - - 1 - 2 - -- 0 - 24 0 (24) 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6_5 - 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 90 495 817 931 20.8 0.5 1 453.024 906 15,855 9 (15,846) 90 495 204 931 41.8 25 1 1045 1,821 8,987 18 (8,969) 93 495 110 931 16.37 0.5 1 356.5386 713 4,635 7 (4,628) 95 473 817 200- 6.95 0.35 - --7 105.9597 - - -48 3,708 576 (3,132) 95 473 200 200 - 6.95 - -- 6.5 7 45 48 540 576 36 NET TRIPS (59,737) Sorted on Item No & TAZ Page 4 0017842 01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 86 381 825 110 3.264 0.35. 0.5 49.762944 _ _71 3,483 924 _ (_2_,559) 70 457 _ 204 110 4.1 1_5 0.5 _61 89 5_24 1,1_60 636 81 435 200 200 160 6.5 3 1040 480 12,480 5,760 (6,720) 19 404 204 200 73.37 15 7 1100 513 9,460 6,156 (3,304) 95 473 817 200 6.95 0.35 7 105.9597 48 3.708 576 (3,132) --52 -489 -822 200 1.03 0.35 7 15.70338 7 2,119 84 (2,035) 82 426 200 200 48 6.5 _ 4 _ 31_2 192_ _ _3,744 _2_,304 (1,440) 55 480 204 200 30.61 15 - 7 459 214 3,947 2,568 (1,379 2 499 204 200 2.587 307 77 18 662 216 (446) 24 385 204 200 5.47 15 7 82 38 705 _ 456 _(249) 95 473 200 200 6.95 6.5 7 45 48 540 576 36 50 499 822 202 2.71 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5,577 392 (5,185) 36 378 204 202 213 19.8 25 1 495 213 4.257 2.087 (2,170) 35 375 204 202 297 23.6 25 1 590 297 5,074 2,910 (2,164) - 72 441 825 202 49 - 1:632 0.5 1 24.5 49 1,715 480 (1,235) 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 3,268 2,146 (1,122) 46 460 204 202 7.64 30 15 229 114 1,969 1.117 (852) 57 495 204 202 _- 7.31 30 _ 15 - _219 _ 109_ 1,883 1,068 _ (815) 44 458 _204 202 7.1 30 _15 _ - 213 1_06 1.831 1,038 (793) 43 458 204 202 7 25 15 --175 105 1,505 1,029 (476) 37 391 204 202 66 4.62 25 1 115 66 989 646 (343) 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 113 67 971 656 (315) 36 379 204 202 51 3.6 25 1 90 51 774 499 (275) 48 460 204 202 1.97 30 15 59 29 507 284 (223) 49 460 204 202 1.13 30 15 33 16 283 156 47 460 204 202 0.01 30 15 0 0 0 0 0 - - - -- ---------- ---- ---- -- -.... ------..-- -- - _.... -- 64 463 822 204 2.01 0.35 -_25 -30_64446 50 4,137 430- (3,707) 34 337 204 204 277 17.75 25 1 443 277 3,809 2,382 (1,427) 33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 165 165 1,419 1,419 0 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 168 168 1,444 1,444 0 23 447 204 204 82.5 11 11 907 907 7,800 7.800 0 23 448 204 204 76.23 11 11 838 838 7,206 7,206 0 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 14 14 120 120 0 35 375 811 811 6 1.5 1.5 392.04 392 16,073 16.073 0 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 0 Sorted on PC LUC & Net Change Pane 5 001784? 01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 17,681 17.681 0 16 441 811 811 2.4 _1 _ _ 1 _ 104.544 105 4,286 4,286 _ 0 23 447 811 811 0 0.35 0.35 0 0 0 0 0 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 0.5 1 71.08992 106 4.976 3.695 (1,281) 6 487 817 817 0.61 0.35 0.35 9.30006 9 325 325 0 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 0.35 5 3 43 117 74 _ 51 363 204 817 1.03 15 0.35 15 16 12_9 549 420 41 387 204 817 2.2 30 _ 0.35 66 34 _ 567 1,173 _606 41 390 204 817 4 30 _ 0.35 120 _61 1,032 2,1_34 1.102 40 387 204 817 2.77 15 -0.35 41 42 352 1,478 1,126 41 391 204 817 7 30 0.35 210 107 1,806 3.735 1.929 41 392 204 817 7.7 30 0.35 231 117 1.986 4.108 2,122 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 0.35 76.23 76 10.291 10.291 0 36 379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6.860 6.860 0 37 391 825 825 1.98 1.5 1.5 129.3732 129 9.056 9,056 0 56 480 204 825 0.55 15 0.35 8 8 68 586 518 58 468 204 825 1.46 25 0.35 36 22 309 1,558 1,249 88 458 204 825 1.92 30 0.35 57 29 490 2.049 1,559 87 475 204 825 12.57 30 0.35 _ 377 192___ _3,242__13,414 _10,1_7.2 33 352 827 827 2.76 0.35 0.35 42.07896 _42_ _ 2,103 2,103 0 83 374 827 827 4.14 0.5 0.5 90.1692 90 4,508 4,508 0 90 495 817 931 20.8 0.5 1 453.024 906 _ 15,855 _9_ (15,846) 90 495 204 931 41.8 25 1 1045 1,821 8,987 _ 18 (8,969) 93 495 110 931 16.37 0.5 1 356.5386 _ 71_3_ _ 4,635_ 7 (4,628) 53 498 200 931 56.28 6.5 1 _ 365 2,452 _ _ 4,380 _ _24 (4,356) 82 520 200 931 16 6.5 _--_1 _- 104 697 _ - 1.248 _- 6 (1,242) 53 494 200 931 10.41 6.5 1 67 453_ _ _ _80_4 _ 4 _( -00) 75 398 811 931 1.22 _ 0.351 18.60012 53 7_62 _ 0 (762) 78 511 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 -- - 27 ----187 -- -324 - 1- - (323) 78 514 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 1 (323) 78 415 200 931 2.86 6.5 1 18 125 216 1 (215) 89 444 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) NET TRIPS (59,737) Sorted on PC LUC & Net Change Page 6 0017842.01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC PC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 90 495 817 -93-1 20.8 0.5 1 453.024 906 15,855 9 (15,846) 90 495 204 931 41.8 25 1 1045 1,821 8.987 18 (8.969) 81 435 200 200 160 6.5 3 1040 480 12,480 5.760 (6,720) 50 499 822 202 2.71 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5.577 392 (5,185) ----- ------ 93 495 110 931 16.37 0.5 1 356.5386 713 4,635 7 (4,628) 53 --4'9''-8' -260 931 ------56.-2-8- 6.5 1 -365 --- 2,452 4,380 24 (4,356) --6--4 --4-63 --8,-22--204- ---3-0-,.-64--4--46 50 4,137 430 (3,707) 19 404 204 200 73.37 15 7 1100 513 9,460 6,156 (3,304) 95 473 817 200 6.95 0.35 7 105.9597 48 3,708 576 (3,132) 86 381 825 110 3.264 0.35 0.5 49.762944 71 3.483 924 (2,559) 36 376-264 202 213 19.8 25 1 495 213 4.257 2,087 (2.170) 15 --375- 204 202 297 -.-....-.-23.6 ...........-25 1 590 297 5,074 2,910 (2.164) 52 489 822 200 1.03 0.35 7 15.70338 7 2,119 84 (2,035) ....--.82 426 -------00 200 48 6.5 . 4 312 192 3.744 2,304 (1.440) 34 337 204 204 277 17.75 25 1 443 277 3,809 2.382 (1,427) 55 480 204 --200 30.61 15 7 459 214 3.947 2,568 (1,379) 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 0.5 1 71.08992 106 4,976 3.695 82 520 200 931 16 6.5 1 104 697 1,248 6 (1,242) 72 441- . 8.25 26-2- -4-9- ----'1-.-63-2 '--0.5 1 ---24.5 49 1,715 -480 (1,235) 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 3,268 2,146 (1,122) 46 460 204 202 7.64 30 15 229 114 1,969 1,117 (852) 15 219 109 1,883 1,068 (815) 57 95 204 202 7.31 �0- 53 494 200 931 10.41 6.5 1 67 453 804 4 800 44 458 204 202 7.1 30 15 213 106 1,831 1,038 (793) 75 398 811 931 1.22 0.35 1 18.60012 53 762 0 (762) 43 458 204 202 7 25 15 175 105 1,505 1.029 (476) 2 499 204 200 2.587 30 7 77 18 662 216 (446) 37 39-1 204 202 66 4.62 2-5 -'-1 115 66 989 646 (343) 78 511 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 1 (323) 78 514 200 931 4.3 -- 6-.5 1 27 187 -32-4- -1 -(323) 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 113 67 971 656 (315) 36 379 204 202 51 -- 3.6 25 1 90 51 774 499 (275) 24 385 204 200 5.47 15 7 82 38 705 ---4-5-6--- ---('24-9) 23) 48 460 204 202 1.97 30 15 59 29 507 2-- 78, 415, 200 931, 2.86, 6.5,-'-1 - 181 125 216 1 (21. Sorted on Net Change Page 7 0017842 Of X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC PC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 49 460 204 202 1.13 30 15 33 16 283 156 (127) 89 444 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) - - - -- - ----._...----- - - ------....-- .._1 - ---....._...33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 165 165 1,419 __ 1,419 0- 3 3 352 827 827 2.76 0.35 0.35 _ 42.07896 42 2,103 2,103 0 ----------- -------- ----- ----- -- -_.... --- -----._ _. -- -- - . - -- - 83 374 827 827 4.14 0.5 U.5 90.1692 90 _ 4,508 _ _ 4,508 0 35 r5- 811 811 6 1.5 1.5 392.04 392 16,073 16,073 0 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 0 36 379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6,860 6,860 0 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 17,681 17,681 0 37 391 825 825 1.98 1.5 1.5 129.3732 129 9,056 9.056 0 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 168 168 1,444 1,444 0 16 441 811 811 -- 2.4---- .4 --... - - 104.544--- -.._.. -05- _...._286 - -4--28.._...6. -- ...___ 1 1 1 4, , 0 23 447 204 204 82.5 11 11 907 907 7,800 7,800 0 --- -.._ -. -- -- -.._.... - -- --- -- - _ _ - - ..._ _ _.. 23 447 811 811 0 U.35 U.35 0 0 0 ___ 0 0 44 23 8 204 -2-0-4 76.23 11 11 838 838 7,206 7,206 0 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 0.35 76.23 76 10,291 10,291 0 47 460 204 202 0.01 30 15 0 0 0 0 0 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 14 14 120 120 0 6 487 817 817 0.61 0.35 0.35 9.30006 9 325 325__ 0 95 473 200 200 6.95 6.5 7 45 48 540 576 36 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 0.35 5 3 43 117 74 51 363 204 817 1.03 15 0.35 15 16 129 549 420 --- ----.. --- --- - - . - - _ . 56 480 204 825 0.55 15 0.35 8 8 68 586 518 41 387 204 817 2.2 _30 0.35 66 34 567 1,173 606 70 457 204 110 4.1 15 0.5 61 89 524 1,160 636 41 390 204 817 4 30 0.35 120 61 1,032 2,134 1,102 40 387 204 817 2.77 15 0.35 41 42 352 1,478 1,126 58 468 204 825 1.46 25 0.35 36 22 309 1,558 1,249 88 458 204 825 1.92 30 0.35 57 29 490 2,049 1,559 41 391 204 B17 7 30 0.35 210 107 1,806 3,735 1,929 41 392 204 817 7.7 30 0.35 231 117 1.986 4.108 2,122 87 475 204 825 12.57 30 0.35 377 192 3,242 13,414 10,172 NET TRIPS (59,737) Sorted on Net Change Page 8 0017842.01 i ATTACHMENT 10 PROPOSED LANGUAGE CHANGES TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER LAND USE ELEMENT LU 4.1.6 lements to facilitate access fer and use as Require that commercial and industrial development incorporate adequate drought-conscious irrigation required by State and Federal Laws systems and maintain the health of the landscape. such as the American's with (1-LU 1, I-LU 4, I-LU 7,and I-LU 19) Disabilities Act. by the physically ^"^"enged LU 4.1.7 I-L U I, 1-L U 3,and I-L U 4) Require that all commercial and industrial landscape be adequately irrigated with automatic irrigation LU 4.2.6 systems. (I-I,(i 1, I-I.0 4, and 1-LU 7) Monitor the conditions of buildings in the City and enforce pertinent building, municipal, and LU 4.1.8 zoning codes to ensure their maintenance and Use reclaimed water for the irrigation of public and quality. (I-LU 19) private landscape, as feasible. (I-LU 1, I-LU 4, 1-LU 7,and I-LU 14) Objective LU 4.3 Objective Ensure that property owners and tenants have access LU 4.2 to educational programs regarding property Ensure that structures and sites are designed and maintenance. constructed to maintain their long-term quality. Policies LU 4.3.1 Policies Promote programs and work with local service Re organizations and educational institutions to inform Requuireire that all structures be constructed in residential, commercial, and industrial property accordance with the requirements of the City's owners and tenants about property maintenance building and other pertinent codes and regulations; methods. (I-LU22) including new, adaptively rc-used, and renovated buildings. (I-LU 3) LU 4.3.2 Promote and support community and neighborhood LU 4.2.2 based efforts for the maintenance, upkeep, and Permit historically significant buildings to vary from renovation of structures and sites. (I-L U 22) standard City codes; providing that the variations do not endanger human life and buildings comply with LU 4.3.3 the State Historical Code. (1-L U 3 and I-L U O) Provide economic assistance, as funds are available, for the improvement of physically deteriorated LU 4.2.3 structures in the City. (I-L1 16 and I-LU 22) Periodically, review and update the City's building and development codes and regulations to ensure Maintenance of Environmental Qualitv that they incorporate professionally accepted Goal state-of-the-art standards. (1-LU 3) LU LU 5 LU 4.2.4 Ensure that significant environmental habitats and Require that all development be designed to provide resources are maintained. adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space, and other pertinent elements. Objective LU 5.1 (1-L U 1, I-L U S, and 1-L U 4) Provide for the protection and maintenance of environmental resources as new development and LU 4.2.5 redevelopment occur in the City. Require that all commercial, industrial, and public development incorporate appropriate design AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II-t� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER LAND USE ELEMENT character and be compatible with adjacent land uses, esidential Mobile Home Park considering the following: -rm • incorporation of site landscape that does not inhibit the Objective visibility of vehicles LU 15.6 particularly along primary street Facilitate the preservation and frontages that a^o^ ^^' ;^h:b:' 'h^ development of Residential Mobile visibility of vehicles; Home Parks. • incorporation of appropriate buffers to screen unattractive site operations (e.g., repair and body shops) from adjacent Policies uses and public rights-of- LU 15.6.1 way; Allow mobile home park • mitigation of the impacts of onsite developments located in areas activities, such as vehicular noise and designated as "Residential Mobile repair operations; and Home Park (-rmp)" to exceed the • incorporation of well-designed and unified underlying density. This designation signage, including temporary is specifically intended to allow signs, pennants, and mobile home park developments in balloons. (I-W 1, I-LU 4, I-LU S, Low Density Residential areas to 1-LU 7,and 1-LU 10) exceed the maximum density of SSecial Design Overlay(-d) seven (7) units per acre (I-LU 1 and Objective I-LU 10) LU 15.5 Ensure that development achieves the visual and DEVELOPMENT POLICY: COMMUNITY SUBAREAS physical character intended for the district in which it is located. Foal LU 16 Policies Achieve the development of distinct neighborhoods, LU 15.5.1 boulevards,and centers. Require that development located in areas designated Objective as "Special Design Overlay (A)" adhere to the LU 16.1 specific design standards stipulated by design and Provide for the differentiation of the Citv's development policies for specific community neighborhoods, boulevards, and districts by their subareas prescribed in the ensuing section of this functional role, uses, form, scale, and character of element, as appropriate. (I-LU 1, 1-LU 4, I-LU S, development. 1-LU 7, I-LU 10 and I-L U 13) Policies LU 16.1.1 Accommodate development of the City's neighborhoods, boulevards, and districts according to the Community Districts and Subareas Schedule (Table LU-6). (I-L U 1, 1-L U 2, 1-L U 4, 1-L U S, I-L U 7, I-L U 10, I-L U 13, and 1-L U 1 S) AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- vs,4 4 `45 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER LAND USE ELEMENT TABLE LU-64(Cont.) Subarea Characteristic Standards and Principles 8 Areawide Functional Maintain and establish commercial centers to serve surrounding Commercial Role residential nei hborhQQd&aDd th 1111111illommu Nodes 8A Permitted Uses Category: Commercial General ('CG') Community • Commercial uses permitted by the"CG"land use category. Commercial Density/Intensity ategory: "-F1" • t: Design and Design to achieve a high level of quality in conformance with Policy Development 10.1.4. 8B Permitted Uses Category: Commercial Neighborhood("CN') Neigh- Commercial uses permitted by the TN"land use category. borhood Commercial Density/Intensity Category: "-F1" • Height: two(2) stories Design and Design to achieve a high level of quality in conformance with Policy Development 10.1.9. 9 Areawide Functional Ensure the development of industrial uses to provide employment for the Industrial Role City's residents and contribute revenue for the City's services. 9A Permitted Uses Category: Industrial(`i') McDonnell Uses permitted by the`i"land use category. Douglas Density/Intensity Category: "-F1" • Height: consistent with existing development, with vertical setbacks adjacent to residential areas and the site's periphery Design and Category: Special Design("-d') Development • Design and site development to achieve a `bampus-park" setting in adherence to Policy 12.1.4 and buildings to achieve a high level of design quality in accordance with Policy 12.1.3. • Integrate new development to be compatible with existing structures and open spaces. • Incorporate extensive landscape along the primary street frontages. • Design and site buildings to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential neighborhoods. 9B Permitted Uses Category: Industrial(`i') Bolsa-Springd Same as Subarea 9A. ale Park Density/Intensity Category: "-F2" • Height: two(2)stories Design and Category: Special Design("-d') Development • Same as Subarea 9A • Encourage the preparation of a specific or master plan to guide development in a unified manner. • Incorporate visual elements to distinguish key entries along principal streets. AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II-W 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER LAND USE ELEMENT intersections, traffic intrusion into be economically feasible and effectively stimulate adjacent residential neighborhoods; further revitalization. Currently, five • compliance with the Congestion Redevelopment Projects are being implemented Management Plan and Circulation (Main-Pier, Huntington Center, Talbert-Beach, Element; Yorktown-Lake, and Oak View). Additional Projects should be initiated where normal market • improvements required by new and planning conditions fail to mitigate problems of development; blight and misuse. • timing of improvements; I-LU 17 • funding of improvements;and Economic Marketing Strategy • transportation demand management strategies. Establish a strategy to attract the development and investment of key industries and commercial I-LU 13 establishments that will contribute jobs and revenue Architectural Design Review to the City. Policies and programs are elaborated on in the Economic Development Element. The City's Design Review Board shall review projects subject to discretionary approval according I-LU 18 to their compliance with established design (I-LU 5) General Plan Monitoringand Update and, as applicable, historic (I-LU 6) guidelines and standards. As required by State statute (California Government Code Section 65400), the City shall review and I-LU 14 report on the status of the General Plan annually. In Capital Improvements Program addition, the Plan should be revised and updated periodically. This shall include (a) an update of The City of Huntington Beach shall continue to baseline data, analyses, and issues to account for incorporate and fund necessary public infrastructure current conditions; (b) evaluation of the policies and and service improvements by the annual Capital programs contained in this Plan to determine their Improvements Program(CIP). effectiveness in achieving the Plan's goals and objectives; and (c) revision of the policies and I-LU 15 programs to increase their effectiveness, where Urban Design Improvement Programs necessary, and account for current issues and legislation. Public input shall be actively solicited in The Pla;i Consider creating an urban the update. Because of the changing dynamics of design improvement plan that provides land use and development it is suggested that the for the implementation of streetscape and other Land Use Element be updated every five to ten years. urban design improvements throughout the City. The Urban Design Element Implementation Program In the event of a propose specifies the methods, responsibilities, funding, and amendment to the General Plan, the schedule for these. following procedure shall be I-LU 16 followed. Redevelopment Plans � The State of California, through the Community 1. Initial Contact—Applicant Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code contacts the Planning staff to Sections 33,000 et seq.) authorizes a city to undertake redevelopment projects to revitalize indicate desire to have General blighted areas. Redevelopment actions should be Plan AmendmentlZoning Map targeted to the projects that can be demonstrated to Amendment initiated AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- 47' (0 8 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTE..R LAND USE ELEMENT 2. Pre Application Meeting- 6. City Council Public Hearing- Planning staff and applicant City Council holds a public discuss applicant's request. hearing to receive public Planning staff explains comment concerning the procedure for filing General General Plan Plan AmendmendZoning Map AmendmendZoning Map Amendment petition and Amendment study and informs applicant of necessary Environmental Assessment. At forms and filing fees. the public hearing, the City Council may approve or 3. Filing of Application -Applicant conditionally approve (by files petition for General Plan resolution), or deny the General AmendmendZoning Map Plan AmendmendZoning Map Amendment and necessary Amendment study and Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment. forms Administrative Amendments 4. Analysis -Planning staff initiates General Plan In maintaining and amending AmendmendZoning Map the General Plan, there are Amendment and Environmental often changes made which in Assessment study after receiving themselves have little or no all necessary information. significant potential direct impact on either the S. Planning Commission Public environment or current Hearing- General Plan development patterns in the AmendmendZoning Map City. Such changes would Amendment and Environmental include minor word changes in Assessment goes before the the document,format changes, Planning Commission for public and revisions or updates to the hearing. Planning Commission Technical Synopsis. None of may recommend approval or these types of changes impact conditional approval, in whole Goals, Objectives, Policies or or in part, or denial after Implementation Measures but receiving public comment at the allow the document to be hearing. updated in an efficient manne . AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- (67J g COMMUNI"I'y DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER LAND USE ELEMENT In accordance with State law, Plan amendments to local school districts to ensure adequate Goals, Objectives, Policies, facilities. Implementation Measures and the I-LU 21 Land Use Map may be adopted a maximum Local Compliance With Regional of four times a year. Those related to the provision Regulations of affordable housing may be updated without limit. The City of Huntington Beach shall continue to I-LU 19 prepare local plans and be responsible for Code Enforcement compliance with a number of regional environmental City of Huntington Beach codes and ordinances that regulations. These include: implement the General Plan shall be enforced. The South Coast Air Quality Management Plan City may wish to expand pro-active code (AQMP); South Coast Air Quality enforcement efforts to include periodic City-initiated Management District (SCAQMD); and surveys of buildings and site conditions, and, where Southern California Association of problems are found, require code compliance. Governments (SCAG). The-City-eHuntington Beaeh is in the pFeeess e I-LU 20 Interagency Coordination empleyeFS to eernply—with the The City of Huntington Beach will continue to ' coordinate with: Growth Management Plan (Measure M). The City shall continue to update the • surrounding jurisdictions to ensure land use Growth Management Element; compatibility and interface of streets and traffic; Congestion Management Plan (CMP). Procedurally, the City's compliance • California Department of Transportation, with the Growth Management Plan Orange County Transportation infers compliance with the CMP; and Authority, and County of Orange Traffic Planning Division for regional Integrated Waste Management Plan and transportation (Interstate 405, Pacific Hazardous Waste Management Plan. Coast Highway, Beach Boulevard, and Huntington Beach has adopted the Southern Pacific Railroad) and public County of Orange Hazardous Waste transit issues; Management Plan by reference to comply with state legislation (AB2948, • California Coastal Commission for Tanner). The City, as appropriate, development of coastal properties; shall determine if it will prepare its • State of California for the operation and own Hazardous Waste Management maintenance of state beach beaches; Plan. • SCAQMD for regional air quality issues; I-LU 22 Coordinate with Property Owners and Developers for • SCAG and State of California Department Property and Neighborhood Maintenance of Housing and Community Development for the provision for The City shall administer programs to encourage affordable housing units; property owners to maintain and upgrade, as necessary, the quality of existing buildings and • County of Orange for the provision of social neighborhoods in the City. Existing and potential services;and programs may include: AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- "0 ;& PROPOSED LANGUAGE CHANGES TO THE GENERAL PLAN � CIRCULATION ELEMENT i INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER CIRCULATION ELEMENT Circulat' n s stems designed with the above hierarchy of streets lar ely as a me f ac vmg the goal of mo ility and access in an efficient manner. Existing roadway classifications utilized in the City include `Freeway," "Principal Arterial," `Major Arterial Street," `Primary Arterial Street," "Secondary Arterial Street," and "Collector." Any street or alley not classified as a collector, secondary, primary, major, principal, or freeway is classified as a local street Regional Access Regional and inter-regional access for the City of Huntington Beach is provided by a system of freeway, major and local arterials. The San Diego Freeway (I-405) is the major north-south freeway that provides regional access to coastal cities in both Orange and Los Angeles Counties. The San Diego Freeway (I-405) crosses along the northern portion of the City. Pacific Coast Highway (State Route 1) extends parallel with the coast along the western portion of the City. Pacific Coast Highway provides regional access from the City of Newport Beach to the south and the City of Seal Beach to the north. Beach Boulevard (State Route 39) begins at Pacific Coast Highway and extends northward through the Cities of Westminster, Garden Grove, Buena Park, and Anaheim. Beach Boulevard has been designated as a"Smart Street Corridor"by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). 3. Description of the Existing Circulation System The existing circulation network in the City of Huntington Beach is primarily developed as a grid system (see Figure CE-1). Due to natural barriers such as the Bolsa Chica wetlands and the Santa Ana River, the grid system becomes discontinuous. The primary north-south streets extending from the San Diego Freeway (1 405) are Bolsa Chica Street, Springdale Street, Edwards Street, Golden West Street, Gothard Street, Beach Boulevard, Newland Street, Magnolia Street, Bushard Street, and Brookhurst Street. These facilities carry volumes of traffic in the 20,000 to 65,000 vehicles per day range. Major east-west streets include Bolsa Avenue, McFadden Avenue, Edinger Avenue, Heil Avenue, Warner Avenue, Slater Avenue, Talbert Avenue, Ellis Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Yorktown Avenue, Adams Avenue, Indianapolis Avenue, Atlanta Avenue, Hamilton Avenue, and Pacific Coast Highway. These facilities carry volumes of traffic in the 10,000 to 50,000 vehicles per day range. AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 11I- INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER CIRCULATION ELEMENT improvements &' e implementation of the City's transportation demand management prplementation of programs to reduce the potential for negative impacts on residential ad programs included in the Circulation Elcment have been designed to provide a transth adequate capacity to accommodate the build-out of the Land Use Element and include mechanisms to monitor and maintain acceptable traffic conditions over time as development occurs. In order to remain eligible to receive Measure M funds and Congestion Management Plan funds (Prop. 111), the City of Huntington Beach has kept certain elements of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) on the 2010 Circulation Plan of Arterial Highways. These items include the proposed Santa Ana River Bridge Crossings and the Bolsa Chica Cross Gap Connector. These elements are required to remain on the City's Circulation Plan of Arterial Highways to maintain consistency with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (OCMPAH). As of 1995, Measure M and Congestion Management Plan funds exceeded of$3,000,000.00 per year. In addition, the Orange County Transportation Authority and surrounding cities are currently discussing the appropriateness of certain elements of the OCMPAH. Due to these uncertainties, future land use planning and transportation planning is based upon the possibility that the OCMPAH road segments may never be constructed. ISSUES 1. Traffic congestion exists on several arterials and intersections within the City. Beach Boulevard experiences congestion along almost its entire length and at several major intersections. Pacific Coast Highway also experiences congestion during weekday peak hours and weekends. (CE 1.2.1, CE 2.1.1, CE 2.1.2, and CE 2.1.3) 2. Parking shortages are experienced*hr-eug out the City pantie larly in the D,.•..,,tey Area and �* along Pacific Coast Highway and in the downtown area is defieien during the peak summer season. (CE 5.1.1 and CE_ 5.1.2) 3. Eaeeur-age Alternative modes of transportation to could provide a smoother link to Central Orange County and beyond. (CE 3.1.1, CE 3.1.2, CE 3.1.4, CE 3.1.5, CE 3.1.6, and CE 3.1.7) AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- `, INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAFFER C/OC11W770nfILK1 T TABLE CE-1 City of Huntington Beach Roadway Segments that Require a Change in Roadway Classification Potential Existing Right-of-Way Estimated Amount of Roadway Classification Need: Acquisition Right-of-Way PFOpesed Required Required Adams Avenue: Brookhurst Street to City Limits 6-lane major 8-lan Principal Y 2'x 1800' Banning Avenue: Bushard Street to Brookhurst Street 4-lane secondary 2-lane N Beach Boulevard: Ellis Avenue to Yorktown Avenue 6-lane major 8-la Principal N Bolsa Chica Street: Edinger Avenue to Rancho Avenue 6-lane major 8-1 'e Principal N Brookhurst Street: Indianapolis Avenue to Garfield Avenue 6-lane major 8- a Principal N Garfield Avenue: Delaware Street to Magnolia Avenue 4-lane primary 6-la N Gothard Street: Warner Avenue to Heil Avenue 4-lane secondary 4-lane primary N Gothard Street: Heil Avenue to McFadden Avenue 4-lane secondary 6-lane major N Heil Avenue: Graham Street to Springdale Street 4-lane secondary 4-lane primary N Main Street: Delaware Street to Beach Boulevard 4-lane secondary 6-lane major N McFadden Avenue: Edwards Street to Golden West Street 4-lane secondary 4-lane primary N Orange Avenue: Golden West Street to Sixth Street 4-lane secondary 2-lane collector N Pacific Coast Highway: Warner Avenue to Golden West Street 4-lane primary 6-lan r N Pacific Coast Highway: N/O Beach Boulevard to S/O Brookhurst Street* 6-lane major 8-la a Principal N Palm Avenue: Golden West Street to Seventh Street 4-lane secondary 2-lane c r N Springdale Street: McFadden Avenue to City Limits 4-lane primary 6-lan -fiffM%s N Warner Avenue: Pacific Coast Highway to Algonquin Street 6-lane major 8-la Principal N Warner Avenue: Gothard Street to Magnolia Street 6-lane major 8- �nePrincipal N Yorktown Avenue: Golden West Street to Main Street 4-lane seconds 4- ma N * Although this street will undergo modifications, the changes will not improve the street's levels of service to LOS C or better. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN III-12 ATTACHMENT 11 i OUTSTANDING ISSUES FORM THE MARCH 25, 19969 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCF_SVCONSFRVATION ELEMENT Objective ERC 2.1.5 ERC 2.1 Identify and determine whether wetlands, Evaluate, enhance, and preserve the City's coastal dunes, bluffs, or riparian areas, will be important habitat areas. given Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) status under the Coastal Plan. (I-ERC Policies 4) ERC 2.1.1 Acquire and maintain the most current ER 2.1.6 information available regarding the status and the Cnlifo Comply with location of sensitive biological elements (species EnyiHA111Y entaI Quality Art. and natural communities) throughout the City. (I-ERC 2) (CEQA) and other Local ERC 2.1.2 State Feder-n! regulations to in neeo...7. nee with the Preserve the habitat fequire .,1,�,,..„, „` „^„„, „ of significant tal natural open space areas, and provide linkage Quality Art (CEQ A Identify and with other restored areas. (I-ERC 1 and I-ERC protect significant MenaFeh Buttei445, 2) es an habitats in the Gibbs Park, ERC 2.1.7 Bolsa Chica, and throughout the City, Develop council approved moire to the extent feasible and ethef Elie plans that provide natural open space linkages and privately owned sites. (I-ERC I, I-ERC between Central Park, the freshwater riparian 2) habitat to the southwest, and the freshwater marsh areas within Bolsa Chica. These linkages ERC 2.1.3 may include the use of open space dedications, Encourage the county to include development of park/natural reserves, or environmentally sensitive lands near greenbelts. (I-ERC 1) the mouth of the Santa Ana River, the Southern ERC 2.1.8 California Edison plant, Bolsa Chica Wetlands Require the restoration of coastal dunes within and the Huntington Beach Wetlands (the United areas designated for preservation (i.e., within States Army Corps of Engineers [US ACOE] the Bolsa Chica study area and the mouth of the mitigation project) for—inclusion into a coastal Santa Ana River/Huntington Beach Wetlands). wetlands preserve. (I-ERC 4) (I-ERC 1 and I-ERC 2) ERC 2.1.4 ERC 2.1.9 Investigate the possibility of including the lands along the Huntington and Talbert channels into Comply with the Califo the wetlands preserve. (I-ERC 2) En iFonmental Qu lity A it (CEQA) and er- Fede regulations to Pres�earve the habitat of endangered species, including those listed in AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 IV-ZJ ZL NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/CONSERVAT/ON ELEMENT Table BR-1 of the Technical BackLby Report Monitor wetland restoration efforts within the Q4) d those which may be considere City City, and establish educational/ administrative the future. J ERC1, I-ER -ERC facilities to be provided by appropriate agencies, and work closely with the county restoration efforts of the Bolsa Chica. (I-ERC 1 and I-ERC ERC 2.1.10 4) Conduct construction activities to minimize adverse impacts on existing wildlife resources. ERC 2.1.16 (I-ERC 1) Control the use of anti-fouling chemical treatments on boats moored in the harbor. ERC 2.1.11 (I-ERC S) Promote the improvement of tidal circulation in Bolsa Chica, Huntington Harbour, and Anaheim ERC 2.1.17 Bay resulting in minimal impacts to sand Monitor harbor dredging to ensure minimal migration, aesthetics, and usability of the beach impacts . water quality, plant, and biological resources. area. (I-ERC 1 and I-ERC 2) (1-ERC S) ERC 2.1.12 ERC 2.1.18 Promote the preservation and restoration Of Require efforts which reduce urban storm water, including the: those sensitive biological areas identified by Policy 2.1.1. (I-ERC 1) a. use of the best available runoff control management techniques in new ERC 2.1.13 development including the Advocate the County to tie any upland National Pollution Discharge development in the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Elimination System Standards Plan segment area to a Bolsa Chica Wetland (NPDES); Restoration Plan, approved by the Coastal b. adoption of guidelines to reduce runoff Commission. (I-ERC 4) from construction sites. These implementation guidelines will be ERC 2.1.14 developed with the guidance and Establish a mitigation monitoring program for approval of the Santa Ana all projects, including the Wetlands Restoration Regional Water Quality Control Plan and Implementation Program, to insure Board and the State Water continued viability of restored wetlands and Resources Control Board; ESHAs. If feasible, a test program shall be established as a prelude to major restoration c. establishment of runoff controls for efforts. These will document conditions by soils removed in restoration and/or which various habitats are best established, and remediation of oil sites;and define criteria for success in the Wetlands d. development of plans to modify flood Restoration Plan and Implementation Program. control channels that empty into (1-ERC 1) the Bolsa Chica, Huntington Beach Wetlands and beach areas. These ERC 2.1.15 modifications should enhance the upstream ability to remove harmful AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 IV- MIZZ wo Zsot; NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/CONSERVATION ELEMENT incorporation of new technology determine the proposal's such as electrification, and public conformance with the walkways to the beach area. (I-CI) requirements of local, Objective State, and Federal ERC 5.2 environmental Provide ample opportunities for businesses and protection laws, such as residents of the community to conserve and but not limited to the reuse natural resources. California Policies Environmental Quality ERC 5.2.1 Act (CEQA) Require, the use of reclaimed water in common areas and landscape treatments of all proposed exa ne spot lay developments. (I-ERC 1) to provide public plazas, entry courts,or common areas; ERC 5.2.2 examine each development's potential Create standards for landscaping and irrigation to encroach upon Biological which are in compliance with State Resource Areas. Determine the requirements. (I-ERC S) necessity for Mitigation Agreements or other coordination ERC 5.2.3 with the California Department of Require that the use of energy saving designs Fish and Game, and/or federal and materials be incorporated into the permits from the US Army Corps construction of all public buildings, while of Engineers, or other agencies for encouraging their use city-wide(1-ERC 1) developments that appear to affect Biological Resource Areas directly ERC 5.2.4 through grading, construction, Require utility provided conservation vegetation removal, or other evaluations be performed prior to construction of factors; all public buildings and projects. (I-ERC 1) • �P '�� eeflst ad+" within 200 eet of a IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS known OF his,teF;e lmtfer45' reos! between I-ERC 1 pesigR Development Review lfee-ess/Environmental Review(CEOA) Through the development review process and butter1};' F005t, the City as determined by the City to be shall—detei€ the required: have !he potential t adver-se1T—impact the AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 IV-ZS�Zfb I NOISE ELEMENT i HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE Ei-EmENT Noise Impacts/Encroachment Within legally justified distance or proximity, to minimize Multi-Occupant Structures potential noise-related impacts on adjacent Objective residential neighborhoods. (I-A'4) N 1.7 Ensure that buildings are constructed to prevent N 1.8.2 adverse noise transmission between differing uses or Discourage the development of new nightclubs, tenants located in the same commercial structure and discotheques, and other high noise-generating individual dwelling units in multi-family residential entertainment uses directly edjaeent to that may structures. IyItpQCt any residential neighborhoods, schools, Policy health care facilities, or other `noise sensitive"land N 1.7.1 uses, unless it can be demonstrated that adequate Rigorously enforce the applicable provisions of the measures can be installed and employed to Uniform Building Code and City of Huntington adequately mitigate the potential impacts of on-site Beach Municipal Code which prevent the operations and/or off-site customer access and transmission of excessive and unacceptable noise activities of these establishments upon these areas.levels between individual tenants and businesses in (I-N 4) commercial structures and between individual N 1.8 4 dwelling units in multi-family residential structures. When a change of a ne«hip occurs ^ when tsee� (1-N 4) nightclub, di Cheque and ether high Noise Impacts of Entertainment and enstti.e the uses subje *�a�,a'�aruse Restaurant/Bar Land Uses peFfRit ,le.. u and appr-eval Objective by,he D ..fl ..:. .� ..,.., it X ) N 1.8 Minimize the generation of excessive noise level Noise Impacts of Rail Uses impacts from entertainment and restaurant/bar Objective establishments into adjacent residential or `noise N 1.9 sensitive"land uses. Minimize the noise effect of rail transit (freight and Peheiepassenger) on residential uses and other sensitive land uses. N RequiFe !hat noise levels emanating ffem Policy entertainment— and—restatiffi Aar- uses net be N 1.9.1 uisee_.,.h f o em ax isiing a'ambient ne:s a levels a! Coordinate with rail planners to: distance of f:fi - (en) feet ffem !he e.iablishment in which it is being eendueted eF within ten (10)fee! e • locate light rail and fixed rail routes and any dwelling ..:. /...h:..he..er s fneFe ems.f:..r:..e\ locate/design rail stations in areas which are accessible to both residential and commercial areas but which also minimize noise impacts on N 1.8.1 surrounding residential and sensitive land uses; Require that entertainment and restaurant/bar uses properly maintain lines and establish take appropriate steps to control the activities of their operational restrictions (e.g., hours of operation, patrons on-site, as well as within a reasonable and AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 v- 1441 AIR QUALITY ELEMENT NATURAL.RESOURCES CHAPTER AIIt QUALITY ELFwENT Policies all business parks, industrial parks, and AQ 8.1.1 industrial designated areas. (I AQ 1) Continue to enforce construction site guidelines that require truck operators to minimize Energy Conservation particulate emission. (I AQ 1) Objective AQ 8.1.2 AQ 10.1 Require installation of temporary construction f Reduce the amount Of energy consumed by facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that commercial uses by 15 percent by 2000 and 30 minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public percent by 2010. and Reduce the roadways. (1-AQ 1) amount of energy consumed by residential use by 4.5 percent by 1994 and 30 AQ 8.1.3 percent by 2010 as required by Southern Encourage developers to maintain the natural California Air Quality Management District. topography, to the maximum extent possible, and limit the amount of land clearing, blasting, Policies grading, and ground excavation operations AQ 10.1.1 needed develo ment. (I-AQ 1) Continue to require the utilization and installation of energy conservation features in all AQ 8.1.4 new construction. (I-AQ 1) Work closely with utility and AQ 10.1.2 industrial companies, such as Cal Encourage the retrofitting of energy Resources or Southern California conservation devices in existing developments. Edison, to review and assess (I-AQ 1) facility impacts to the City of AQ 10.1.3 Huntington Beach and its Encourage energy use audits, and identify conservation measures, for all existing residents and visitors. (I AQ 1, commercial and industrial structures. (1 AQ 4) I-AQ 4) Interagency Coordination Sensi Lve Receptors Objective Objectives AQ 11.1 AQ 9.1 Improve air quality in the South Coast Air Basin Minimize sensitive uses (residential, hospitals, through inter-agency coordination. schools,etc.)exposure to toxic emissions. Policy Policies AQ 11.1.1 AQ 9.1.1 Coordinate with SCAQMD, SCAG and other Assure that sufficient buffer areas exist between local, state, and national agencies in efforts to a sensitive use and a potential toxic emission plan and implement clean air strategies for the source. (I-AQ 1) South Coast Air Basin. (1-LU 20) AQ 9.1.2 Require design features, operating procedures, preventative maintenance, operator training,and emergency response planning to prevent the release of toxic pollutants for applicable uses in AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 Iv- 4 ljo 7 SI q URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER UTILITIES ELEMENT weighed against the potential for the screening elements themselves to block significant views. (UD 2.2.1 and I1D 2.2.3) 30. Each existing landmark should be enhanced to capitalize on its assets or to mask its negative qualities. New landmarks could be introduced at appropriate locations to aid in establishing orientation and direction. (UD 1.2.1, UD 2.2.1) 31.Utilities, such as the Edison Generating Substation, need to be screened from view, to the extent feasible, through the use of improved landscaping. UD 1.2.1,) 32. The construction of new or the expansion of existing utility and industrial facilities, such as the Edison generating station or Cal Resources, may impair the visual quality of an area. (U 5.1.3 and U 5.1.4) AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- 8� i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT TABLE UD-1 Recommended Entry Node Improvements (See UD 1.2.2) NODE I?t D�s ROVEMENTS Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway Provide pedestrian c for beach users; • Use public signage that is compatible with the overall street plan and the Signage and Graphics Program. • Underground utilities. • Install streetscape improvements that combine the Beach Boulevard streetscape theme with the less formal coastal corridor imagery. Five Points Blend the landscape imagefy styles of Main Street and Beach Boulevard at the Five Points node,using the fiefa both rage ser*idAr-- • Coordinate improvements with Caltrans,where appropriate. • Underground utilities. Primary Gateway Entry Nodes(see Figure Provide public signage that identifies the City of Huntington Beach UD-2) and indicates directions to the major destinations in the City Santa Ana River Br-eeldufst Include"theme"landscape materials and,possibly,public art. &Feet/Pacific Coast Highway gateway • Underground utilities. Brookhurst Street/Garfield Avenue • iftpol4oal spat lnopNW40anca Edinger Avenue/San Diego FreewayBeac • Explore the use of landscaping buffers around the Edison Boulevard intersection Warner Avenue/San Diego Freeway Generating Station, adjoining tank farm, and Orange County Golden West StreetBolsa Avenue Adams Avenue/Santa Ana River/ Sanitation Facilities. Brookhurst Warner Avenue/Pacific Coast Highway • Bolsa Chica Street and Rancho Avenue Secondary Entry Nodes(see,Figure UD-2) • Provide smaller public signs that are similar to the larger scale Magnolia Street/Garfield Avenue Primary Gateway Entries monument signs. Springdale Street at city limits • Ex for e potential to use surplus freeway right-of-way or Golden West Street/Pacific Coast Highway y Pacific Coast Highway/Beach Boulevard • Explore the use of landscaping buffers around the Edison Pacific Coast Highway/Seal Beach City Generating Station, adjoining tank farm, and Orange County limits Sanitation Facilities. Pacific Coast Highway and Seapoint St. Pacific Coast Highway and Magnolia St. Pacific Coast Highway and Newland St. AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- 6a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT UD 1.4.2 Policies Coordinate the involvement of artists and the role of UD 2.2.1 art in the image of the City with the provisions of the Require landscape and architectural buffers and Historic and Cultural Resources Element. (I-UD 2) screens d oil production facilities and other di s visible inpublic rights-of-way. (1-UD I Coal and I-UD UD 2 Protect and enhance the City's public coastal views and oceanside character and screen any uses that Require the removal of non-productive oil detract from the City's character. production facilities and the restoration of the Buffers And Barriers-Coastal Corridor vacated site. (1-UD I) Objective UD 2.2.3 UD 2.1 Require landscaping materials to screen flood Minimize the visual impacts of new development on control channels where the ehannels visible to public views to the coastal corridor, including views public view and where uate planting of the sea and the wetlands. area available. (1-UD IUD 6,) , d I-(ID 3) Policies UD 2 2 4 UD 2.1.1 Require the undergrounding of utility lines. (I-UD Require that new development be designed to 1, 1-UD 2, a -UD 3) consider respeet coastal views in it&.massii g A. h ' d site orientatin.. (I- an - UD 2.2.S 6) Discourage the construction of new and or expansions of existing UD .1.2 industrial and utility facilities that Require additional landscaping and varying visually impair the City's coastal hardscape along the beach trail and roadway medians, where appropriate. (I-UD 1, I-UD 2, and corridor and entry nodes. (I-UD 2 I-UD 3) and 1-UD 6) Buffers And Barriers - Industrial Uses and Oil IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS Production Facilities Objective 1-UD 1 UD 2.2 Streetscane Improvement Plan Minimize the visual impacts of oil production facilities and other utilities where they encroach Prepare a comprehensive streetscape improvement upon view corridors or are visually incompatible plan specifying all potential improvements projects with their surrounding uses. within the public rights-of-way, including design concepts and design criteria for median and parkway landscape, sidewalk elements including street AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- its COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER URBAN DEsIGN ELEMENT furniture, and public signage, including gateway I-UD 4 entry identification signage. Comprehensive Signage and Graphics Program I-UD 2 Prepare a comprehensive Citywide program for the Coordinated Public Policv design and installation of signage and graphics that identifies standards for a high quality and character Coordinate all guidelines and standards within the for all public graphics (including identification and City of Huntington Beach to conform to the directional signage)and that integrates standards for objectives and criteria outlined in the policies of this private commercial signs. element. Update and/or amend the following policies, guidelines, standards and specifications: I-UD 5 Code Enforcement and Maintenance • Public Works Standard Plans/ Specifications (for landscape and tree Regularly and periodically monitor the planting); maintenance of private and public property (such as • Master Plan for Landscaping of Arterial private or public walls or service structures), to Street Medians; ensure compliance with all applicable zoning and • Arboricultural and Landscape munici des. Standards/Specifications; • Downtown Design Guidelines; and • Downtown Specific Plan. IUD 6 I-UD 3 Development or Desirn Review Phased Improvement Plan Through the development or design Establish a plan for the preparation and/or revision review process, require Or continue of all public urban design criteria and standards and for the implementation of all public improvements to: identified in such plans. a. The City shall prepare a master list of review all projects for potential public urban design improvements, such list to be revised and extended as visual impacts to projects are completed or new projects surrounding areas; are conceived. b. In coordination with the preparation of the require Design Review Board City budget, the City shall each year prepare a Five-Year Plan for Urban review of all projects within Design Improvements that prioritizes areas designated by the City the projects on the master list, and shall Council or deserving budget for those projects accordingly. The Five-Year Plan shall be updated special aesthetic each year to reflect changes in the consideration; these areas priorities for implementation. include, but are not limited to, the Downtown Specific AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- ab, of I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT Plan area, Beach Boulevard, Pacific Coast Highway, areas adjacent to or zoned as Public- Semipublic, areas within primary and secondary entry nodes, and Redevelopment Project areas; • review all proposed expansions, relocations, or new utility and industrial facilities for compliance with applicable development standards and for potential impacts. AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 II- 4k.111 UTILITIES ELEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER UTILITIES ELEMENT 11. The State Legislature, through Assembly Bill 939 (AB939) and the California Integrated Waste Management Board Act of 1989, mandates that all cities must prepare, adopt and summit a comprehensive solid waste management plan to the county in which it is located by July, 1991. This plan must govern and contain each city's efforts and intended policies in the area of waste characterization, source reduction, recycling, composting, solid waste facilities, education and public information, funding, special wastes, and hazardous wastes, and must meet certain targets for percentages of waste reduction and recycling over specified time periods. Implementation of the solid waste management programs will require commitment of staff and funding to the programs. (U 4.2.1 and U 4.2.2) 12. With the anticipated developments of Bolsa Chica, Meadowlark, Holly-Seacliff, Ellis-Golden West, and McDonnell-Douglas, additional distribution lines need to be installed to accommodate these communities. (U 5.1.1) 13. With the anticipated developments in Huntington Beach, additional electrical distribution system will need to be installed to meet the demand. (U 5.1.1) 14. The City of Huntington Beach needs to cooperate with SCE, as well as other utilities, to create a plan or timetable to convert the City to underground utilities. (U 5.1.2) 15. New s rvice lines will have to be installed in areas of new development. (115.1.1) 16. The construction of new or the expansion of existing utility and industrial facilities, such as the Edison generating station or Cal Resources, may impair the visual quality of an area. (U 5.1.3 and U 5.1.4) AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- '?ID INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER UTILITIES ELEMENT implement the pollutant runoff Policies control program; 5.1.1 "maintenance" program for necessary Continue to work with service providers to maintain reservoir repairs. The current levels of service and facilitate improved maintenance program shall levels of service. (I-U 5) discuss prioritization, funding, responsible departments, and 5.1.2 Continue to underground above ground electrical scheduling; S. a program for water, wastewater and storm drain and pipeline 5.1.3 repairs, upsizing and Review requests for new utility replacements; facilities, relocations, or expansions who upgrade defeetive to existing facilities. (I-U 2) Wig; • explore the feasibility of 5.1.4 developing an Discourage the construction of new incentive program utility facilities, and expansions or for property owners relocations of existing utility who upgrade facilities that visually impair the City's coastal corridor and entry defective plumbing; nodes. (I-U 2) a fee review program to tfi-annually review and amend, as needed, PROGRAM rate payer fees and charges; and I-U 1 Special Infrastructure Programs During development review, a siruetwal a. Develop and implement the following as PEOgFafn examining review funding permits: structures intended for human habitation and constructed • pollutant runoff control program which within the 100 year flood plain includes structural controls, for conformance with all non-structural controls, and jurisdictional requirements. best management policies. Code enforcement measures Require all residential, shall be applied to remedy any commercial, and industrial deficiencies. sites and construction sites to b. Continue and expand the following programs: AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- g 3 INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER UTILITIES ELEMENT • the NPDES, as appropriate, which that sufficient inftastmetufe Utility includes: capacity is available. If sufficient - requiring industries and capacity is not available, the City shall not approve the project until additional construction activities capacity or adequate mitigation is larger than five acres provided; to obtain regulatory permits for pollution the construction of the facilities necessary runoff control; for the connection to a public water - adopting a drainage area distribution, sewer and drainage system, or payment of fees. All management plan for facilities within the City shall be the City to control designed and constructed in pollution runoff;and conformance with the adopted water, - performing a reconnaissance sewer and drainage master plans and survey of the the standards established by the Public discharges to Works Department; eliminate illegal and the use of water efficient fixtures and illicit surface water water-saving design elements in new and groundwater construction (in accordance with discharges; Government Code Section 66473.1); • public education promoting water and conservation; the determination that an adequate potable • water use audits for all City owned water supply is available for the buildings. The audit program discretionary project. Building permits shall identify levels of existing shall not be issued until an adequate water use and potential water supply is available. Domestic conservation measures; water supplies shall meet State and the Green Acres and other reclaimed Federal water quali standards. • water programs; and • local, State and Federal requirements • the review Of all proposed mandated by SCAQMD. expansions, relocations, or Consider assessing fees, where new facilities for appropriate, to offset compliance with applicable implementation costs. development standards and I-U 2 for potential impacts. Development or Design Review I-U 3 Through the development or design review process, Studies require or continue to require the following: • all new developments to be linked to the Perform the following studies and implement existing sewer system; programs addressing the study's findings: AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- a so sit HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES in the area bounded by Gothard Street, Warner Avenue, Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, and The following section presents the goals, objectives, Cedar Avenue (as shown in Figure HCR-2). The policies, and programs for Historic and Cultural overlay should specifically target Resources in the City of Huntington Beach. At the end of each policy is a reference to the appropriate historically significant structures. The implementing program. Each implementing overlay will encourage the adaptive reuse of the program's schedule and possible funding sources are existing historic structures while maintaining the indicated in the Historic and Cultural light industrial surrounding uses. (1-HCR 5 and Implementation Matrix. LU 15.3.1) Historical Resources HCR 1. Goal Consider establishing a historic overlay for the HCR 1 historic downtown and other appropriate areas. To promote the preservation and restoration of the (I-HCR S) sites, structures and districts which have architectural, historical, and/or archaeological HCR 1.1.5 significance to the City of Huntington Beach. Consider recording the importance of oil history in the City's development. (I-HCR 1) Objective HCR 1.1 Objective Ensure that all the City's historically and HCR 1.2 archaeologically significant resources arc identified Ensure that the City ordinances, programs, and and protected. policies create an environment which fosters preservation, rehabilitation, and sound maintenance Policies of historic and archaeological resources. HCR 1.1.1 Identify all the historically and archaeologically Policies significant resources in Huntington Beach. (I-HCR HCR 1.2.1 1) Utilize the Secretary of Interior Standards for Historic Rehabilitation and standards and guidelines HCR 1.1.2 as prescribed by the State Office of Historic Consider the designation Of any historically Preservation as the architectural and landscape design standards for rehabilitation, alteration, or significant public trees, archaeological sites, or additions to sites containing historic resources in structural sites or areas deemed to be of historical, order to preserve these structures in a manner archaeological, or cultural significance as a consistent with the site's architectural and historic Huntington Beach City Historical Point, Site or integrity. (I-IICR 6) District. (I-IICR 2, 1-HCR 3, and I-HCR 4) HCR 1.2.2 HCR . .3 Encourage new development to be compatible with Consider establishin�aMsorical overlay for adjacent existing historic structures in terms of scale, any historically significant structures AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 • APPENDIX PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN January 20, 1996 4*24LL o J BOLSAv ARGOSYrd q 31111 C -tom EDL`rcElt 2.1 10 Dt 3 — 1`t Zo 9& 1 HEIL g�31 761 WARNER. E5 441 37 - �5 y � t1l 42- TALBERI 95 ` ` • t EL LIS Z -74 O • e� 13 — — — — — — - taw ` 64 �o� 6Tt; 4Y et 87 55 YORKTD do 66 �L S / i Z. Bq ADAMS O _ O a N l NDIAItAPOUS 1 fA ba q � • ATLANTA Sl 9 3 $ S I xAJ mmq 9p 5 5o L � This map presents the general location of proposed changes to the General Plan land use designations. Please contact the 3 Department of Community Development for more detail and explanation. i i g.james•gcnpl an.no'.map2 Huntington Beach General Plan Update (GPA No. 94-2) Land Use Map Recommendations - City Council Review City Council Adopted May 13, 1996 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COI NC'IL NO. LOCATION PLAN CONIMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 1 Southwest RL CN-F1 CG-FP2 Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff& Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Low to Commercial Banning Ave.& Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential Neighborhood Bushard St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing General Plan to Commercial designation:(CN-Fl)- FAR) zoning and existing Neighborhood(CN-F1) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 22) conditions designation(Straw Vote absent 5-0) a 2,,. South side of RH P(RH-30) RH Add Public(P) Disagree with PC; do not Disagree with Staff& Change from Residential Hamilton Ave. (Residential Public- (Residential designation to decrease density from 30 to GPAC: recommend High to Residential 300'west of High underlying High Density) identify 7 du/ac,agree with CPAC: change from Residential Medium Density and add Brookhurst St. Density) Residential church/school no change to existing High to Residential Low Public designation:P High Density Residential High Density with Public(P) (R114-15)-Straw Vote 5-2 (DM 20) 30 un/ac (RH)land use designation, designation;decrease in only add Public(P) density from 30 to 7 designation du/ac,P(RL-7)NOTE: inconsistent with zoning (Straw Vote 5-0) 3. Northwest RL CN-Fl CG Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff'& Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Low to Commercial Atlanta Ave.& Low Density Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential Neighborhood Newland St. Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial designation:(CN-Fl)- FAR) zoning and existing Neighborhood(CN-Fl) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (D.-.'A 13) conditions designation(Straw Vote absent 5-0) City Council adopted 5/13/96 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLA.V 11 GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLtV COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 4. Atlanta Ave.east RL P(RL-6.5) RL Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add P(Public)to of (Residential Public- Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Residential Low Density Leasure Ln. ( g g g g Low underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density Public(P)designation; designation:P(RL-7)- (DM 14) Density) Low Density church/school (RL)land use designation, retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Residential, retain maximum 7.0 un/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) absent 6.5 un/ac 5. Northwest Recreation P(Public) RA-RL Public designation Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Recreation to corner of (Residential. for a Utility right new designation for utility recommend Public(P) Public designation:(P)- Magnolia St.& Agriculture, of way right of way designation to identify Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Hamilton Ave. Residential utility right of way(Straw absent Low Density) Vote 5-0) (DM 14) 6. Southwest RL CN-F1 CG-FP2 Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change to Low to Commercial Indianapolis Ave Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and Commercial Neighborhood Neighborhood designation: &Newland St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing General Plan (CN-Fl)designation (CN-FI)-Straw Vote 6-0, FAR) zoning and existing (Straw Vote 6-1) Dettloff absent (DM 13) conditions f26 GN F! CGIC-G FP3 ChaPrti fern A.....+e with GPAC-, Deleted;change to General No action necessary of l3ushs & (Residentta{ (Gemmereial (C-emmercial Resident eFte Plan designation has been Gar-field Ave; LIDW Neighbarheed; General; CemmeF68140 between Zoning and previously approved Density) Density-0.35 €leedplai*) refleet existing man (gN¢6) FA-R) :coning and existing eenditiens 8. Northwest RL CN-Fl Q-CG-FP2 Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff'&GPAC: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Qualified, Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Low to Commercial Bushard St.& Low Neighborhood, Commercial Commercial to between Zoning and Residential to Commercial Neighborhood designation: Litchfield Dr. Density) Density 0.35 General, reflect existing General Plan Neighborhood(CN-Fl) (CN-Fl)-Straw Vote 6-0, FAR) Floodplain) zoning and existing designation(Straw Vote 5- Dettloff absent (DM 6) conditions 0) City Council adopted 5/13/96 + 2 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLA.N GENERAL ADNISORY EXISTING PLANNINGCOWNIISSION CITYCOUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATION'S RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 9. Southwest RM OS-P(Open OS-PR-FP2 Change Residential Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential corner of (Residential Space-Park) (Open Space, to Open Space Park provides consistency recommend change from Medium to Open Space- Delaware St.& Medium Parks and to reflect existing between Zoning and Residential to Open Space- Park designation:(OS-P)- Detroit Ave. Density) Recreation, park General Plan Park(OS-P)designation Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Floodplain) (Straw Vote 5-0) absent (DM 12) M. P-eeirie C-efts! RH MV F8 SP DTn SP#1 0HI*ge4fom Agree with GP. Deleted;change to General No action necessary Highway (Residentia) (Mixed Use (-Downtown fesidenftal to Modified Plan designation has been "ntage High Vertieal— Specifie Planj eon►roer6e6 fimendments+nade4o previously approved between Density) Density 1.5 District#j. Dewntown-Speeifie Plan 6th St.&8th St. FAD 7' Visitor Serving (appreved-April 1, 995) 0.35 FAR _ Eommer-eial) (DM 12) 25-dulae-, Speeifie *an) 11. Southwest RA'I CN-F1 -D CG Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Medium to Commercial Alabama St.& Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and Residential to Commercial Neighborhood designation: Adams Ave. Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan Neighborhood(CN-FI-D) (CN-FI-D)-Straw Vote 6- FAR,Design, zoning and existing designation(Straw Vote 5- 0,Dettloff absent (D1%7 12) Overlay) conditions 0) 12. Northeast corner RA4 OS-P(Open R1%4-0 Change Residential Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential of Huntington (Residential Space-Park) (Residential to Open Space Park change to reflect existing recommend change from Medium to Open Space- St.&Wichita Medium Medium to reflect existing conditions,may require Residential to Open Space- Park designation:(OS-P)- Ave. Density) Density,Oil park(Boys and future zone change Park(OS-P)designation Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Overlay) Girls Club)_ (Straw Vote 5-0)NOTE: absent;NOTE: (DM 2) inconsistent with zoning inconsistent with zoning City Council adopted 5/13/96 3 (g\genp1n\cc1ndus2) EXISTING CENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO.^ LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECONINIENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECO.1.NtENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Add Public P Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add Public(P)to 13. Southwest Ri11 P(R111- 15) RM ( ) g P corner of Clay (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC;no change to recommend change to add Residential Medium Density Ave.&Delaware Medium underlying Medium identify existing Residential Public(P)designation designation:P(RM-15)' St. Density) Residential Density) church/school Medium Density(11111) (Straw Vote 5-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Medium land use designation absent (DM 2) Density 15 un/ac 14. Northeast corner RM P(RM- 15) RM Add Public(P) Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add Public(P)to of Clay Ave.& (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC;no change to recommend change to add Residential Medium Density Delaware St. Medium underlying Medium identify existing Medium Density Public(P)designation designation: P(RM-15)- Density) Residential Density) church/school Residential(RM)land (Straw Vote 5-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 2) Medium use designation absent Density 15 un/ac 15. South side of IG(Industrial P(I)Public- IL(Industrial Add Public(P) Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add Public(P)to Industrial Garfield Ave., General) underlying Limited) designation to GPAC;no change to recommend change to add designation:P(I-F2)-Straw Gothard St.& Industrial identify City's existing Industrial(I) Public(P)designation Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent Huntington St. Water Yard land use designation (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 2) 16. Southwest Mixed MH-F3-30- Pacifica Modify existing Agree with PC:disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Mixed corner of Main Development SP(Mixed Community. Mixed Use with GPAC;change to recommend change to Mixed Development to Mixed Use St.&Florida St. Use Plan designation to Mixed Use designation Use and add Specific Plan and add Specific Plan (East of Florida) Horizontal, reflect existing use and add Specific Plan (SP)designation(Straw designation:(MU-SP)- Density 1.0 and conditions Vote 6-0-1 abstain) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 39) FAR,30 absent un/ac, Specific Plan) City Council adopted 5/13/96 ti 4 (g\genp1n\cc1ndus2) EXISTING GENER.U.PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 17. Southwest RM P(RMH-25) RMH Add Public(P) Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential corner of Ellis (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC;increase in recommend to add Public Medium Density to Ave.&Chapel Medium underlying Medium High identify density from 15 to 25 (P)designation,increase Residential Medium High Ln. Density) Residential Density) church/school, du/ac,provides density from 15 to 25 du/ac and add Public designation: Medium High increase density consistency between (Straw Vote 5-0) P(RMH-25)-Straw Vote (DM 40) Density 25 from 15 to 25 du/ac Zoning and General Plan 6-0,Dettloff absent un/ac 18. Park site; north RM OS Park OS-PR(Open Change Residential Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential of Pacific Coast (Residential (Open Space, Space,Parks to Open Space Park provides consistency recommend change from Medium to Open Space- Highway& Medium Park) and to reflect existing between Zoning and Residential to Open Space- Park designation:(OS-P)- Warner Ave. Density) Recreation) park General Plan Park(OS-P)designation Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (Straw Vote 5-0) absent (DM 35) 19. Northeast of RL R114- 15 RMP Land use change to Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff. Retain Residential Low Heil Ave.& (Residential (Residential (Residential reflect existing with GPAC; recommend recommend retain existing Density and add Mobile Saybrook Ln. Low Density) Medium Manufactured density of Mobile Mobile Home Overlay Residential Low Density 7.0 Home Overlay designation: Density 15 Home Park) Home Park, and retain existing du/ac and add Mobile (RL-7-RMP)-Straw Vote (DM 23) un/ac) increase density Residential Low Density Home Overlay(Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent from 7 to 15 du/ac designation 5-0) 20. 300'Northwest RL P(RL-6.5) RL Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add P(Public)to of Heil Ave.& (Residential Public- (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Residential Low Density Springdale St. Low Density) underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density Public(P)designation; designation:P(RL-7)- Residential church/school (RL)land use retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 24) Low Density designation,retain (Straw Vote 5-0) absent 6.5 un/ac) maximum 7.0 un/ac City Council adoplcd 5/13/96 1 5 (g\genp1n\cc1ndus2) EXISTING GENERALPLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING CONLMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECONI\1ENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 21. 300'Southwest SR(Senior RMH-25 (Q)RMH Eliminates Senior Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Senior of Edinger Ave. Residential) (Residential (Qualified, Residential provides consistency recommend change from Residential to Residential &Springdale St. Medium High Residential Designation,RMH between Zoning and Senior Residential to Medium High designation: Density 25 Medium High allows senior General Plan Residential Medium High (RMH-25)-Straw Vote 6- (DM 24) un/ac) Density) residential (RMH-25)designation 0,Dettloff absent development (Straw Vote 5-0) 22. Northeast of CG P(CN-FI) CG Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add,P(Public)to McFadden Ave. (Commercial Public- (Commercial designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Commercial Neighborhood &Edwards St. General) underlying General) identify Commercial land use Public(P)designation designation:P(CN-F1) Commercial church/school designation (Straw.Vote 5-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 17) Neighborhoo absent d,Density 0.35 FAR) 23. Shell/Cal Industrial- MH-F1-30 M2-01 -CZ; Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC Change from Industrial Resources site, Resource -SP(Mixed R4-0-CZ; Industrial to Mixed expands the visitor recommend change from Resource to Mixed Use Pacific Coast Production Use CI -O CZ Use serving commercial Industrial-Resource Horizontal designation with Highway Horizontal, (Industrial opportunities along the Production to Mixed-Use overall 15 du/ac average: between Density 0.35 General,Oil coast,allows residential Horizontal;recommend F2- (MH-F2-30-SP)-Straw Seapoint Ave.& FAR,30 Overlay, development, 30(.5 FAR,30 du/ac); Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent Golden West St. un/ac, Coastal Zone; incorporates property recommend"average" Specific Plan) Residential owner&residents density of 15 du/ac(Straw (DM 3,4&10) High Density, comments(will require Vote 7-0) Oil Overlay, future zone change and Coastal Zone; Master Plan/Specific Commercial Plan) Neighborhood, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone) 1 City Council adopted 5/13/96 + 6 (g\genpin\cclndus2) IEXISTING GENERALPLA.V GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNINGCONBUSSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DFSIGNATION DF,SIGNATION 24. 1,500'Southwest IG(Industrial RM-15 1G(Industrial Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff- Change from Industrial of Warner Ave. General) (Residential General) Industrial to with GPAC;change to recommend change from General to Residential Low &Gothard St. Medium Residential to Residential Low Density Industrial to Residential Density and add Mobile (Mobile Home Density, 15 reflect existing and add Mobile Home Low Density 7.0 du/ac,add Home Overlay designation: Park) un/ac) conditions(Mobile. Overlay(will require Mobile Home Overlay. (RL-7-RMP)-Straw Vote Home Park) future zone change NOTE:inconsistent with 6-0,Dettloff absent (DM 31) Zoning(Straw Vote 4-1) 25. Southeast corner IG(Industrial I-F2-H IL(Industrial Add Historic(H) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add Historic Overlay to of Gothard St.& General) (Industrial, Limited) Overlay to area to no change to Industrial recommend to add Historic Industrial designation:([- Warner Ave. Density 0.5 identify Historic (I)land use designation Overlay(Straw Vote 5-0) F2-H)-Straw Vote 6-0, FAR, structures(Slater Dettloff absent(sites to be (DM 31) Historical House,etc.) determined) Overlay) 26. 50'Northwest of RL P(RL-6.5) RL(Residential Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add P(Public)to Edinger Ave.& (Residential Public- Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Residential Low Density Golden West St. Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density Public(P)designation; designation:P(RL-7)- Residential church/school (RL)land use retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 17) Low Density designation,retain (Straw Vote 5-0) absent 6.5 un/ac maximum 7.0 un/ac 27. 500'Northwest RL P(RL-6.5) RL(Residential Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Add P(Public)to of Edinger Ave. (Residential Public- Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend change to add Residential Low Density &Golden West Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density Public(P)designation; designation: P(RL-7)- St. Residential church/school (RL)designation,retain retain maximum 7.0 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Low Density maximum 7.0 un/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) absent DM 17) 6.5 un/ac City Council adopted 5/13/96 7 (g\gcnp1n\cc1ndus2) EXISTING GENERALPLA.V �j GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PL.A.NNINGCOVMISSION CITYCOUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECONINIENDATIONS RECONIMENDATIONS RECO?I\tENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 28. Northwest RM CN-F1 CG Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency recommend change from Medium to Commercial McFadden Ave. Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and Residential Medium Density Neighborhood designation: &Golden West Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial (CN-FI)-Straw Vote 6-0, St. FAR) zoning and Neighborhood(CN-FI) Dettloff absent (DM 17) conditions designation(Straw Vote 5- 0) 29. P,Q-P,I P(CG-FI) PS(Public Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Public,Quasi- Northeast corner (Public, Public Semi Public) Public,Quasi- expands commercial recoii,mend change from Public,Institutional to of Golden West Quasi- underlying Public, opportunities along Public,Quasi-Public, Commercial General and St.&Edinger Public, Commercial Institutional to Edinger Corridor by Institutional to Commercial add Public designation:P Ave.(Edinger Institutional) General, Public with changing the designation General(CG-FI)and add (CG-F1)-Straw Vote 6-0, frontage) Density 0.35 underlying to Commercial General Public(P)designation Dettloff absent;NOTE: FAR) Commercial with Public(P) (Straw Vote 5-0)NOTE: inconsistent with zoning (DM 15) General designation to identify inconsistent with zoning designation at college Golden West College 30. Southeast of CG CR-F2-D CG Upgrades existing Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Commercial Golden West St. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands regional recommend change from General to Commercial &Edinger Ave. General) Regional, General) designation to commercial opportunities Commercial General to Regional designation:(CR- Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access Commercial Regional(CR- F2-D)-Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 26) FAR,Design Commercial F2-D)designation(Straw Dettloff absent Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) 31. South side of CG CR-F2-D CG Upgrades existing Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Commercial Edinger Ave. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands commercial recommend change from General to Commercial from Gothard General) Regional, General) designation to opportunities with Commercial General to Regional designation:(CR- St.to Parkside Density 0.5 Regional freeway access Commercial Regional(CR- F2-D)-Straw Vote 6-0, Ln. FAR,Design Commercial F2-D)designation(Straw Dettloff absent (DM 26) Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) .I City Council adopted 5/13/96 8 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAY GENERAL ADVISORY ExIST1YC PLAYNINCCOU\IISS(ON CITI'COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAY COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFFRECOII\fF;NUATIOYS RECOMMENDATION'S RECOVn1ENDATIOYS DESIGNATIO\ DESIGNATION 32. Northeast of CG CR-F2-D CG(Commercial Upgrades existing Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Commercial Gothard St.& (Commercial (Commercial General) Commercial expands commercial recommend change from General to Commercial Edinger Ave General) Regional, designation to opportunities with Commercial General to Regional designation:(CR- Density 0.5 Regional freeway access Commercial Regional(CR- F2-D)-Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 15). FAR,Design Commercial F2-D)designation(Straw Dettloff absent Overlay) designation Vote 5-0) 33.. Southeast of P,Q-P,P NIV-F8-D. RL(Residential Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Public,Quasi- McFadden Ave. (Public, (Mixed Use Low Density), Public,Quasi- promotes an activity recommend change from Public,Institutional and &Gothard St. Quasi- Vertical, IG(General Public, center by adding Public,Quasi-Public, Mixed Development to Public, Density LS Industrial),CC- Institutional and commercial/residential Institutional and Mixed Mixed Use Vertical (DM 15) Institutional) FAR[MU], H(Commercial Mixed Use to (mixed use)designation Development to Mixed Use designation:(MV-F8-D)- MD(Mixed 0.35 FAR [C], General-High Mixed Use near a transit center Vertical(MV-F8-D) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Development 25 un/ac) Rise Overlay) Vertical designation(Straw Vote 7- absent (CommerciaUResid 0) ential)at the Transit Center Area 34. Huntington CG MV-F9-SP CG(Commercial Modifies Disagree with PC,agree Disagree with Staff and Change from Commercial Center (Commercial (Mixed Use General) Commercial with GPAC:recommend GPAC:eliminate mired General to Commercial General) Vertical, designation by mixed use to expand and use,recommend change Regional designation with (DM 15) Density 1.5 adding Mixed Use revitalize opportunities from Commercial General Mixed Use Overlay:(CR- FAR[MU], (CommerciaUResid for the Mall,promote the to Commercial Regional- F2-SP-MU)-Straw Vote 4- 0.5 FAR [C], ential);Continues regional importance of FAR.5-Specific Plan(CR 3 25 un/ac) Regional the site but may(not -F2-SP))designation Commercial uses, require)allow residential (Straw Vote 5-1) may permit development in the area residential development City Council adoptcd 5/13/96 9 (g\gcnpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING CONL111SSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE 7.0NING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 35. Aldrich Ave. CG MV-F10-D CG-RMH- Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& Change from Residential south to Heil (Commercial -A(Mixed RM Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change Medium and Residential Ave.west side of General) Use Vertical, (Commercial designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General Medium High to Beach Blvd. RMH Density 1.5 General; adding Mixed Use du/ac,agree with GPAC; to Mixed Use Vertical, Commercial General (Residential FAR[MU1, Residential (Commercial/Resid allows continued decrease density from 25 to designation:(CG-F2)- (DM 26) Medium 1.5 FAR[Cl, Medium High ential);continues Commercial uses and 15 du/ac(Straw Vote 6-0) Straw Vote 7-0; NOTE: High 25 du/ac, Density; commercial uses, development,permits NOTE:inconsistent with inconsistent with zoning Density)RM Design Residential may permit (not require)residential zoning (Residential Overlay, Medium - residential uses and provides Medium Auto Density) development,does possible relocation of Density) Overlay) increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers 36. Heil Ave.south CG MV-F10-D CG-RM Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& Change from Residential to Warner Ave. (Commercial -A(Mixed (Commercial Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change Medium to Commercial east&west sides General) Use Vertical, General; designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General General designation:(CG- of Beach Blvd. RM Density 1.5 Residential adding Mixed Use du/ac,agree with GPAC; to Mixed Use Vertical, F2)-Straw Vote 6-0-1 (Residential FAR[MU[, Medium (Commercial/Resid allows continued decrease density from 25 to abstain;NOTE: (DM 26&27) Medium 1.5 FAR [C1, Density) ential); continues Commercial uses and 15 du/ac(Straw Vote 6-0) inconsistent with zoning Density) 25 du/ac, commercial uses, development,permits NOTE:inconsistent with Design may permit (not require)residential zoning Overlay, residential uses and provides Auto development,does possible relocation of Overlay) increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of l Auto Dealers City Council adopted 5/13/96 + 10 (g\genp1n\cc1ndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNINGCO\IMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS REC0�1�fENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 37. Southeast of CG MV-F10-D RM Modifies existing Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& Change from Residential Beach Blvd.& (Commercial (Mixed Use (Residential Commercial reduction of residential GPAC: recommend change Medium to Commercial Warner Ave. General) Vertical, Medium designation by density from 25 to 15 from Commercial General General designation:(CG- RM Density 1.5 Density) adding Mixed Use du/ac,agree with GPAC; to Mixed Use Vertical, F2)-Straw Vote 7-0; (DM 30) (Residential FAR[MU], (Commercial/Reside allows continued decrease density from 25 to NOTE:inconsistent with Medium 1.5 FAR [C], ntial);continues Commercial uses and 15 du/ac(Straw Vote 6-0) zoning Density) 25 du/ac, commercial uses, development,permits NOTE:inconsistent with Design may permit (not require)residential zoning Overlay) residential uses and provides development,does possible relocation of increase some Auto Dealers to form density from 15 to future Auto Mall 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers 38. Northeast of RH P(RMH-25) RMH Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential Nichols St.& (Residential Public- (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend change from High to Residential Warner Ave. High underlying Medium High identify Multi-Family Residential Residential High to Medium High Density and Density) Residential Density) church/school; does designation,but does Residential Medium High add Public(P)designation: (DM 26) Medium High reduce density from reduce the density from Density and add Public(P) P(RMH-25)-Straw Vote Density,25 35 to 25 du/ac 35 to 25 du/ac designation,does decrease 6-0,Dettloff absent un/ac) density from 35 to 25 du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0) 39. 200'Northwest Mixed Use RMH-25 Q-RMH Change from Mixed Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Mixed Use to of Magnolia Ave. (Residential (Qualified, Use to Residential provides consistency recommend change from Residential Medium High &Warner Ave. Medium High Residential Medium High between Zoning and Mixed Use to Residential Density designation: Density,25 Medium High Density to reflect General Plan Medium High Density 25 (RMH-25)-Straw Vote 6- (DM 27) uo/ac) Density) existing zoning and du/ac(Straw Vote 6-0) 0,Dettloff absent conditions City Council adopted 5/13/96 11 (g\genpin\cc1ndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN CENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLLNNINCCON"11SSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAIN COMMITTEE ZONINC DISCUSSION STAFF RECONINIENDATIONS RECOMMENDATlOVS RECOMMENDATION'S DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 40. Southeast corner Commercial RM- 15 OP(Office Change from Office Disagree with PC,agree. Disagree with Staff& Retain existing of Warner Ave. General (Residential Professional) Professional to with GPAC;change to GPAC: recommend no Commercial General and Oak Ln. Medium' Residential Medium residential is compatible change to Commercial designation:(CG-Fl)- Density) Density with adjacent designation General-FAR.35(CG- Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 31) F1)designation(Straw absent Vote 6-0) 41. East&west CG RH-30 CG Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff.eliminate Retain existing sides of Beach (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC;eliminate residential node and Commercial General Blvd.,Blaylock General) High Density, General) to Residential High forming residential nodes, recommend no change to designation: (CG-Fl)- Dr.south to 30 un/ac) Density to form no change to commercial Commercial General- Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Ronald Dr. residential node, designation FAR.35(CG-Fl) absent breaks continuous designation(Straw Vote 5- (DM 30&31) strip commercial 0-1 absent) development 42. Southeast of RM P(Public)- CG Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential Beach Blvd.& (Residential designation to (Commercial designation to identifies existing hospital recommend change from Medium Density to Public Newman Ave. Medium reflect General) identify hospital; use Residential Medium designation: (P)-Straw Density) hospital removes Residential Density to Public(P) Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent (DM 30) Medium Density(15 designation(Straw Vote 6- du/ac)designation 0) City Council adopted 5/13/96 12 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING 11 GENERALPLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITYj1E.N LNCIL NO. LOCATION PL&N COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS REC0.%IIDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION' 43. East side of RM RMH-25 RM-RMH Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential Florida St.,17th (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC:do not recommend retain existing Medium Density St.to Yorktown Medium Medium High Medium to Residential create residential node Residential Medium designation:(RM-15)- Ave. Density) Density,25 Density; Medium High and increase density from Density 15 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff un/ac) Residential Density to reflect 15 to 25 du/ac,retain designation(Straw Vote 6- absent;NOTE:portion of (DM 2) Medium High existing conditions existing Residential 0)NOTE:portion of site site(R-MH)inconsistent Density) and create node, Medium Density (RMH)inconsistent with with zoning does increase density zoning from 15 to 25 du/ac in some areas 44. 800'South of RM RH-30 RM-RMH Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential Garfield Ave.on (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC:do not recommend retain existing Medium Density east side of Medium High Density, Medium to Residential High create residential node Residential Medium designation:(RM-15)- Florida St.to Density) 30 un/ac) Density; Density to reflect and increase density from Density 15 du/ac Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Yorktown Ave. Residential existing conditions 15 to 30 du/ac,retain designation(Straw Vote 6- absent;NOTE:portion of Medium High and create node, existing Residential 0)NOTE:portion of site site(RMH)inconsistent (DM 2) Density) does increase density Medium Density (RMH)inconsistent with with zoning from 15 to 30 du/ac zoning in some areas 45. 300'Southwest RM CG-F1 RM Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential of Yorktown (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium reflects existing recommend change from Medium Density to Ave.&Beach Medium General, Medium to Commercial conditions and uses Residential Medium Commercial General Blvd. Density) Density 0.35 Density) General to reflect Density to Commercial designation:(CC-F1)- FAR) existing conditions General(CG-Fl) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 2) designation(Straw Vote 6- absent;NOTE:inconsistent 0)NOTE:inconsistent with with zoning zoning City Council adopted 5/13/96 13 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMIMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECONINIENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 46. East of Florida RM RH-30 RM Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential St.,300'south of (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC;Do not recommend retain existing Medium Density Yorktown Ave. Medium High Density, Medium to Residential High create residential node Residential Medium Density designation:(RM-15)- to Adams Ave. Density) 30 un/ac) Density) Density to reflect and increase density 15 du/ac designation(Straw Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff existing conditions from 15 to 30 du/ac, Vote 6-0) absent (DM 2) and create node, retain existing does increase Residential Medium density from 15 to Density 30 du/ac in some areas 47. 100'Northeast RM P(RH-30) RM Add Public(P) Agree with PC,modify Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential of Utica Ave.& (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC recommendation; recommend retain existing Medium Density and add Florida St. Medium underlying Medium identify add Public(P) Residential Medium Density Public designation:P(RM- Density) Residential Density) Church/School; designation to identify 15 du/ac and add Public(P) 15)-Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 2) High Density, does increase school or church,but do designation(Straw Vote 6- Dettloff absent 30 un/ac) density from 15 to not increase density from 0) 30 du/ac 15 to 30 du/ac,retain existing Residential Medium Density(15 du/ac) - r with Staff. Retain existing RM P RH 30 RM Add Public P Agree with PC modify Agree st 48. East of Florida ( ) g + fY g g St.300'south of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC recommendation; recommend retain existing Medium Density and add Utica Ave. Medium underlying Medium identify add Public(P) Residential Medium Density Public designation: P(RM- Density) Residential Density) Church/School; designation to identify 15 du/ac and add Public(P) 15)-Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 2) High Density, does increase school or church,but do designation(Straw Vote 6- Dettloff absent 30 un/ac) density from.15 to not increase density from 0) 30 du/ac 15 to 30 du/ac,retain existing Residential Medium Density(15 du/ac) City Council adopted 5/13/96 + 14 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING 11GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNINGCONL,IISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN CO\1N11TTEE ZONING DISCUSSION' STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION'S RECO\111 ENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 49. 100'Northeast RM P(RH-30) RM Add Public(P) Agree with PC,modify Agree with Staff- Retain existing Residential of Adams Ave. (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC recommendation; recommend retain existing Medium Density and add &Yorktown Medium underlying Medium identify add Public(P) Residential Medium Public designation:P(RM- Ave. Density) Residential Density) Church/School;does designation to identify Density 15 dulac and add 15)-Straw Vote 6-0, High Density, increase density school or church,but do Public(P)designation Dettloff absent (DM 2) 30 un/ac) from 15 to 30 du/ac not increase density from (Straw Vote 6-0) 15 to 30 du/ac,retain existing Residential Medium Density(15 du/ac) 50. South side of RM CN-F1 RM-FP2 Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff:retain Retain existing Residential Hamilton Ave. (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium with GPAC; retain existing Residential Medium Density 400'east of Medium Neighborhoo Medium Density to existing Medium Density Medium Density(RM-15) designation:(RM-15)- Bushard St. Density) d,Density Density, Commercial Residential,no change to designations,no change to Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff 0.35 FAR) Floodplain) Neighborhood commercial designation commercial designation to absent (DM 20) to the west the west(Straw Vote 6-0) 51. Northeast corner CG RM- 15 CG-FP2 Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial of Hamilton Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC:existing recommend retain existing General designation:(CG- &Brookhurst General) Medium General, to Residential commercial would Commercial General(CG- Fl)-Straw Vote 6-0, Street. Density, 15 Floodplain) Medium Density become non-conforming, Fl)designation(Straw Dettloff absent un/ac) designation should reflect Vote 6-0) (DM 19) existing conditions and uses,retain existing Commercial General designation City Council adopted 5/13/96 15 (g\gcnpin\cc1ndus2) EXISTING GENT ALPLI.N GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING C0N711ISSION CITY COUNCIL EP10. LOCATION PLAN CONt\IITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECONINIENDATIONS RECOMINIENDATIONS REC0,I."IENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 52. Northwest RL CN-F1 CG Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff, Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Low with GPAC;no change to recommend retain existing Low Density designation: Indianapolis Low Neighborhoo General) Density to current designation, Residential Low Density 7.0 (RL-7)-Straw Vote 5-1, Ave.&Bushard Density) d,FAR 0.35) Commercial property owner will be du/ac,no change to existing Dettloff absent;NOTE: St. Neighborhood required to request zone designation,NOTE: inconsistent with zoning change or general plan inconsistent with Zoning (DM 7) amendment at time of (Straw Vote 5-0) development proposal 53. Northwest OS-C RL-6.5 LUD-CZ- Change from Open Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff- Retain existing Open Space corner of Pacific (Open Space (Residential FP2(Limited Space Conservation with GPAC; retain recommend retain Open Conservation designation: Coast Highway - Low Density, Use District, to Residential Low existing Open Space Space Conservation(OS-C) (OS-C)-Straw Vote 6-0, &Brookhurst Conservatio 6.5 un/ac) Coastal Zone, Density in a portion Conservation designation designation(Straw Vote 4- Dettloff absent St.(White Hole n) Floodplain) of the White Hole 1) area) Area (DM 22&29) 54. Southwest RM RL-6.5/RH- Magnolia Modify designations Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff. Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential 30 Pacific to reflect existing with GPAC;modify recommend retain existing Medium Density and add Magnolia St.& Medium (Residential Specific Plan and approved land designation and map to Residential Medium Density Specific Plan designation: Hamilton Ave. Density) Low Density, use map designations reflect specific plan 15 du/ac designation and (RM-15-SP)-Straw Vote 6- NESI(Aston) 6.5 un/ac, to conform to designation add Specific Plan(Straw 0,Dettloff absent site Residential specific plan(MDR- Vote 6-0) High Density, 15) (DM 14) 30 un/ac) 55. 100'North of RL RM- 15 RMP Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential Yorktown Ave., (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Low to with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing Low Density and add west side of Low Medium Manufactured Residential Medium existing Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 Mobile Home Overlay Brookhurst St. Density) Density,15 Home Park) Density,increase in Density designation and du/ac designation and add designation:(RL-7-RMP)- un/ac) density from 7 to 15 add Mobile Home Mobile Home Overlay Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff DM 6 un/ac to reflect Overlay (Straw Vote 6-0) absent existing density of Mobile Home Park City Council adopted 5/13/96 16 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERALPI-AN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING ]FPL4-NNINGCOM\USSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 56. 1000'South of CG RM- 15 CG Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial Garfield Ave., (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing General designation:(CG- west side of General) Medium General) to Residential existing Commercial Commercial General(CG- Fl)-Straw Vote 6-0, Brookhurst St. Density,15 Medium Density General designation Fl)designation(Straw Dettloff absent un/ac) Vote 6-0) (DM 6) 57. 1,000 feet south CG RH-30 RH Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Commercial of Atlanta Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Residential Commercial General with GPAC;do not recommend to designate General to Residential east side of General) High Density, High Density) and Residential increase density to reflect entire site Residential Medium Density Beach Blvd., 30 un/ac) Medium to density bonus,designate Medium Density 15 du/ac designation:(RM-15)- (Breakers RM RH Residential High entire site Medium (Straw Vote 6-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Development) (Residential RH-30 (Residential Density,density Density Residential to absent Medium (Residential High Density) increase from 15 to reflect existing conditions, (DM 14) Density) High Density, 30 du/ac 30 un/ac) 58. Northwest and CG RMH-25 CG Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial southwest of (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing General designation:(CG- Joliet Ave.& General) Medium High General) to Residential existing commercial land Commercial General(CG- FI)-Straw Vote 6-0, Beach Blvd. Density,25 Medium High Density use designation Fl)designation(Straw Dettloff absent un/ac) Vote 6-0) (DM 12) W. AerHfwest R?#4 P-(R14H---2-5) RA4 Add Publie4R) Disagree with GPAG, Deleted;change to General No action necessary eet<neF of (Resident fd Publie— (Residential designittion tO Fefleet seheel hits been refnewd Plan designation has been V—nexwille Ave: Medium underlying Medium Se 10O.Well"feh; and site developed previously approved &Be di-] 1 . Density) Residential Density) increase in density (Greystene)at Medium from fr�vt*r- 5 to 25 oat3/.flfResidential Nied (DNI 12) Density 25 Density 15 ufgee—,fet$m du/ae existing land use designation. City Council adopted 5/13/96 17 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERALPLA:V GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PI.ANNLNCCOV\11SSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFFRECO�I\tENDAT1pNS RECOMMENDAT1pNS RE COAIaIENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 60. Southeast corner Planned CG-F1 CG Change from Planned Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Planned of Adams Ave. Community (Commercial (Commercial Community to with GPAC; recommend recommend to designate as Community to Mixed Use &Beach Blvd. General, General) Commercial General designation as Mixed Use Mixed Use and add Specific and add Specific Plan (Seabridge Density 0.35 and add Specific Plan Plan(Straw Vote 6-0) designation:(MU-SP)- Specific Plan FAR) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff area) absent (DM 13) 61. South of Orange RM P(CN-1) RMH-A Add Public(P) Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff. Retain existing Residential Ave.between (Residential Public- (Residential designation to reflect with GPAC; add Public recommend retain Medium High Density and 10th St.&11th Medium underlying Medium High school/church,change (P)designation to Residential Medium High add Public designation:P St. Density) Commercial Density, from Residential Residential Medium High density and add Public(P) (RMH-25)-Straw Vote 6- Neighborhoo Small Lot Medium Density to (25 du/ac)Density to designation(Straw Vote 7- 0,Dettloff absent (DM 12) d,Density Subdistrict) Commercial provide consistency 0) 0.35 FAR; Neighborhood and between Zoning and P(RL-22) Residential Low General Plan Public- Density underlying Residential Low Density, 22 un/ac 62. Northwest Mixed RMH-25-D CG/RMH-A Change from Mixed Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Mixed corner of Acacia Development (Residential (Commercial Development to with GPAC;change to recommend change to Development to Mixed Use Ave.&Main St. Medium High General/ Residential Medium Mixed Use Horizontal- Mixed Use Horizontal Horizontal designation: Density,25 Residential High Density F1 (FAR 0.35)-25 du/ac (MH-Fl-25)designation (MH-FI-25)-Straw Vote (DM 12) un/ac,Design Medium High to reflect existing (Straw Vote 7-0) 6-0,Dettloff absent Overlay) Density, conditions and uses Small Lot Subdistrict) City Council adopted 5/13/96 18 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERALMAN _ GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOVSIENDATIONS RECOJ1AfENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 63. Northwest RM CN-F1-D CG Change from Agree with PC&CPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential corner of 17th (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium provides consistency recommend change to Medium Density to St.&Olive Ave. Medium Neighborhoo General) Density to between Zoning and Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Density) d,Density Commercial General Plan,modify (CN-Fl)designation designation:(CN-F1)- (DM 10) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood to boundary line on map (Straw Vote 6-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Design reflect existing absent Overlay) conditions and uses 64. Northwest RM CN-F1-D CG Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Residential corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium with CPAC; add Public recommend change to Medium to Residential Orange Ave.& Medium Neighborhoo General) Density to (P)designation to Residential Medium High Medium High Density and 17th St.(Roger's Density) d,Density Commercial Residential Medium High Density 25 du/ac and add add Public designation: P Senior Center) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood Density(25 du/ac)to Public(P)designation (RA1H-25)-Straw Vote 6- Design reflect Senior Center and (Straw Vote 6-0)NOTE: 0,Dettloff absent: NOTE: (DM 10) Overlay) city owned land inconsistent with zoning inconsistent with zoning 65. Northeast corner OP(Office NIV-F8-SP CO-0 Change from Office Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff. Retain existing of Yorktown Professional) (Mixed Use (Commercial Professional to Mixed with GPAC;retain recommend retain existing Commercial Office and Ave.&Main St. Vertical, Office,Oil Use Commercial Office Commercial Office(CO- remove Specific Plan Density 1.5 Overlay) (Commercial/Residen designation F2)designation and designation: (CO-F2)- (DM 2) FAR[A4U1, tial) remove Specific Plan Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff 0.35 FAR[C), (Straw Vote 6-0) absent 25 du/ac) 66. South side of P,P-Q,I, RL-6-5 RL-01 Change from Public, Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Public, Yorktown Ave. (Public, (Residential (Residential Quasi-Public, with GPAC;add Public recommend change to Quasi-Public,Institutional between Golden Quasi- Low Density, Low Density, Institutional to (P)designation to Residential Low Density to Residential Low Density Nest St.& Main Public, 6.5 du/ac) Oil Overlay) Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 un/ac and add Public and add Public St. Institutional) Density and retain maximum 7.0 (P)designation(Straw designation:P(RL-7)- un/ac Vote 7-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 2) absent City Council adopted 5/13/96 + 19 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENEIIALPLAN CENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS1[ RECONfMENDAT10NS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 67. Northeast corner RM RL-6-5 RL Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential of 17th St.& (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium provides consistency recommend change to Medium to Residential Low Huntington Ave. Medium Low Density, Low Density) Density to Residential between Zoning and Residential Low Density Density designation:(RL-7) Density) 6.5 du/ac) Low Density, General Plan,retain 7.0 7.0 du/ac(Straw Vote 7-0) -Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 2) decrease in density un/ac absent from 15 to 6.5 du/ac 68.- Nor4hwest RM I—F2-SP �r�'. ' -Seae in Change frern Agree with`.SAC, Deleted;change to General No action necessary eorner of (Residential (Indttstfiat, SpeeWie-Wan Residential N4edium poovides-eonsisteney with Plan designation has been C'_. St.& Medium Density-" (Industrial/ Density to ndustr-ial Zoning(Specs fi Dian) previously approved C�eyAve. Density) FA-R-,,Spee&e —3) War+) in 69. Southeast corner RNI P(RM-15) Holly Seacliff Add Public(P) Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential of Crystal St.& (Residential Public- Specific Plan designation to with GPAC;do not add recommend retain existing Medium Density and add Garfield Ave. Medium underlying (Residential Residential Medium Public(P),retain existing Residential Medium Specific Plan designation: Density) Residential Medium Density(YMCA) Residential Medium Density 15 du/ac and add (RM-15-SP)-Straw Vote (DM 2) Medium Density/IV Density land use Specific Plan(SP) 6-0,Dettloff absent Density 15 1) designation and add designation(Straw Vote 7- du/ac Specific Plan(SP) 0) 70. Northwest IG RM-15 IG/IL Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Industrial corner of (Industrial (Residential (Industrial Industrial General to with GPAC:do not recommend retain existing General designation:(IG- Huntington St. General) Medium General/ Residential Medium change to Residential Industrial(IG-F2a) Fla)-Straw Vote 6-0, &Clay Ave. Density 15 Industrial Density Medium Density,retain designation(Straw Vote 7- Dettloff absent (Cambro site) du/ac) Limited) existing Industrial 0) designation and modify (DM 2) FAR from F2(.5)to F2a .75 City Council adopted 5/13/96 20 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PIA,NINC COAL IISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE TONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECO.NMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESKNATION 71. Southeast corner Mixed P(MH-F3- Pacifica Add Public(P) Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Mixed of Delaware Development 30-SP) Community designation with with GPAC;change to recommend change to Development to Mixed Use Ave.&Main St. Public- Plan Mixed Use Mixed Use and add Mixed Use,add Specific and add Specific Plan underlying (CommerciaVResident Specific Plan;modify Plan(SP)designation and designation:(MU-SP)- (DM 39} Mixed Use ial)designation to boundary line on the modify boundary line on Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Horizontal, reflect existing map to reflect existing map to reflect existing area absent Density 1.0 conditions and uses area (Straw Vote 6-0-1 abstain) FAR,30 un/ac, Specific Plan 72. Southeast corner Mixed CG-F2-D CO Change from Mixed Disagree with PC& Disagree with Staff and Change from Mixed of Main St.& Development (Commercial (Commercial Development to GPAC;maintain density GPAC: recommend change Development'to Florida Ave. General, Office) Commercial Office at 25 du/ac and change to Mixed Use Horizontal, Commercial General with Density 0.5 to Mixed Use decrease density from 25 to Mixed Use Overlay (DM 39) FAR,Design Horizontal,F2 (FAR 15 du/ac(Straw Vote 6-0-1 designation:(CG-F2-D- Overlay) 0.51,30 un/ac,Design abstain)NOTE: MU)-Straw Vote 6-0-1 Overlay inconsistent with zoning abstain 73. !North side of RL P(RL-6.5) RL Add Public(P) Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Retain existing Residential Garfield Ave., (Residential Public- (Residential designation to GPAC;correct location recommend retain existing Low Density and add east of Gregory Low underlying Low Density) Residential Low on map,retain Residential Low Density Public designation:P(RL- Lane. Density) Residential Density to identify maximum 7.0 du/ac 7.0 du/ac,add Public(P) 7)-Straw Vote 6-0, Low Density church/school designation and correct Dettloff absent (DM 40) 6.5 du/ac location on map(Straw Vote 7-0 74. Northwest RM P(RMH-25) RMH Add Public(P) Disagree with PC Disagree with Staff& Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to reduction in density GPAC: recommend retain Medium Density and add Modale Dr.& Medium underlying Medium High Residential Medium from 25 to 15 du/ac, existing Residential Public designation:P(R.M- Chapel Lane Density) Residential Density) High Density to agree with GPAC: Medium Density 15 du/ac 15)-Straw Vote 7-0; Medium High identify church/school, provides consistency and add Public(P) NOTE:inconsistent with (DM 40) Density 25 increase in density between Zoning and designation NOTE: zoning du/ac from 15 to 25 du/ac General Plan,correct inconsistent with Zoning location on ma Straw Vote 7-0 City Council adopted 5/13/96 21 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNINGCO]t\IISSION CITYCOU:NCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN 11 COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECONIMENUATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 75. North side of OS-R CV-F1 CF-C -CZ Change from Open Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Open Space Warner Ave., (Open Space (Commercial (Community Space Recreation to with GPAC: retain recommend retain existing and add Public designation: 100'northwest -Recreation) Visitor, Facilities, Commercial Visitor existing Open Space and Open Space and add Public P(OS-P)-Straw Vote 6-0, of Warner Ave. Density 0.35 Civic Uses, add Public(P) (P)designation(Straw Vote Dettloff absent &Pacific Coast FAR) Coastal Zone) designation 7-0) Highway (DM 35) 76. North side of RM RL-6.5 R1-CZ Change from Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential Warner Ave., (Residential (Residential (Residential • Residential Medium GPAC;provides recommend change to Medium to Residential Low 500'northwest Medium Low Density Low Density, Density to Residential consistency between Residential Low Density Density designation:(RL-7) of Warner Ave. Density) 6.5 du/ac) Coastal Zone) Low Density Zoning and General 7.0 du/ac(Straw Vote 7-0) -Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff &Pacific Coast Plan,decrease in density absent Highway from 15 to 7 un/ac (retain maximum 7.0 (DM 34&35) un/ac) 77. Huntington Mixed RM-15,CR Huntington Change from Mixed Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff- Change from Mixed Harbour Bay Development -F1-SP Harbour Bay Use to Residential with GPAC:retain recommend retain existing Development to Mixed Use Club Specific (Residential Club Specific Medium Density and Mixed Use designation. Mixed Use and add Specific and add Specific Plan Plan` Medium Plan Commercial Regional and add Specific Plan to Plan(SP)designation designation:(MU-SP)- Density 15 reflect existing (Straw Vote 7-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 34) du/ac, conditions and uses absent Commercial Regional, Density 0.35 FAR,Specific Plan) t City Council adopted 5/13/96 22 (g\genp1n\cc1ndus2) • EXISTING CEVERALPLA_V GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING P[-ANNING CO\1JLISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLA,V COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECO1111C DAUSS' REC0�11fENDATIONS DESIGNATION 11 DESIG.NAT10N 78. Southern OS-R(Open RL-6.5 RL-FP2 Change from Open Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Open Space termination of Space- (Residential (Residential Space Recreation to with GPAC;no change recommend retain Open designation:(OS-P)-Straw Bolsa Chica St. Recreation) Low Density Low Density, Residential Low to existing Open Space Space designation(Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent 6.5 du/ac) Floodplain) Density designation Vote 4-3)NOTE:new (DM 33) RA-CZ designation is Open Space- (Residential Park(OS-P) Agriculture, Coastal Zone) 79. Meadowlark Planned CG,RM- 15, Meadowlark Change from Planned Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Planned Specific Plan Community RL-6.5 Specific Plan Community to with GPAC:change to recommend change to Community to Mixed Use area (Commercial Commercial General, Mixed Use designation Mixed Use and add Specific and add Specific Plan General, Residential Medium and add Specific Plan Plan(SP)designation designation:(MU-SP)- (DM 24) Residential Density and (Straw Vote 7-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Medium Residential Low absent Density 15 Density du/ac, Residential Low Density 6.5 du/ac) 80. Southwest IG P(I)Public- IL(Industrial Add Public(P) Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Industrial corner of (Industrial underlying Limited) designation to with GPAC:church is recommend retain existing General designation:(I-F2- McFadden Ave. General) Industrial Industrial designation temporary use,delete Industrial(I-F2) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff &Product Lane to identify Public(P)designation designation(Straw Vote 7- absent church/school and retain Industrial 0) (DM 18) designation 81. Area bounded Residential RL-6.5 Ellis Golden Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential by Ellis Ave., Estate;3 (Residential West Specific Residential Low with GPAC;modify recommend retain existing Estate designation:(RL-3) Garfield Ave., du/ac Low Density Plan Density 3 un/ac to designation to Residential Estate 3 du/ac -Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Edwards St., 6.5 du/ac) Residential Low Residential Low Density (Straw Vote 7-0) absent Golden West St. Density 6.5 du/ac 3 un/ac (DM 38) (increase in density) City Council adopted 5/13/96 23 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECONINIENDATIONS RECOMMENDATION'S RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 82. Northwest of Residential RL-6.5 Holly Seacliff Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Residential Edwards Ave.& Estate;4 (Residential Specific Plan Residential Low with GPAC; do not recommend retain existing Estate and Open Space Garfield St.and du/ac and Low Density (Residential Density 4 un/ac to increase density,modify Residential Estate 4 du/ac Park designations:(RL-4, northwest of Open Space- 6.5 du/ac)and Low Density, Residential Low designation to and Open Space-Park OS-P)-Straw Vote 6-0, Seapoint St.& Recreation Open Space- 4 un/ac& Density 6.5 du/ac Residential Low Density designations(Straw Vote 7- Dettloff absent Garfield Ave. Park Open Space) (increase in density) 4 un/ac,retain Open 0) and Open Space-Park Space-Park designation (DM 38 83. Southwest of IG CR-Fl-D 1G(Industrial Change from Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Industrial Gothard St.& (Industrial (Commercial General) Industrial General to GPAC:designate entire recommend change to General to Commercial Edinger Ave. General) Regional, Commercial Pedigo site as Regional Commercial Regional(CR- Regional designation:(CR- Density 0.5 Regional Commercial,expands F2-D)designation NOTE: F2-D)-Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 26) FAR,Design commercial along inconsistent with zoning Dettloff absent;NOTE: Overlay) Edinger corridor inconsistent with zoning 84. Northeast of Mixed I-F2-D 1L(Industrial Change from Mixed Agree with PC& Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Mixed railroad R.O.W. Development (Industrial, Limited) Use to Industrial to GPAC;provides recommend change to Development to Industrial &McFadden Density 0.5 reflect existing consistency between Industrial(I-F2-D) designation(I-F2-D)- Ave. FAR,Design conditions and uses Zoning and General designation(Straw Vote 7- Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Overlay) Plan 0) absent DM 15) 85. North Mixed CO-F4 North Change from Mixed Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Mixed Huntington Development (Commercial Huntington Use to Commercial with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing Development to Mixed Use Center Specific Office, Center Specific Office to reflect Mixed Use and add Mixed Use and add Specific and add Specific Plan Plan area Density 1.25 Plan area existing conditions Specific Plan(SP) Plan(SP)designation designation:(MU-SP)- FAR) and uses (Straw Vote 7-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (DM 15) absent 86. Northwest of Mixed CG-FI Q-IL Change fro:r Mixed Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff- Change from Mixed Magnolia St.& Development (Commercial (Qualified, Use to Commercial with GPAC;change to recommend change to Development to Industrial Warner Ave.@ General, Industrial General Industrial(I-Fl), Industrial(I-Fl) designation:(I41-Straw Riverbend Dr. Density 0.35 Limited) provides consistency designation(Straw Vote 7- Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent FAR) between Zoning and 0) 1•M 27 General Plan City Council adopted 5/13/96 24 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING CON CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN CO\1�11TTEE ZONIIN DISCUSSION STAFFREC011\fENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 87. 1,000'Southeast CG RH-30 CG Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial of Garfield Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC;eliminate recommend retain existing General designation:(CG- &Beach Blvd. General) High Density General) to Residential High Residential node on Commercial General(CG- FI)-Straw Vote 6-0, 30 un/ac) Density to create Beach Blvd.,retain FI)designation(Straw Vote Dettloff absent (DM 1) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General designation 88. 1,000'Southwest CG RH-30 CG Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Retain existing Commercial of Beach Blvd. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General with GPAC;eliminate recommend retain existing General designation:(CG- &Garfield Ave. General) High Density General) to Residential High Residential node on Commercial General(CG- F1)-Straw Vote 6-0, 30 un/ac) Density to create Beach Blvd.,retain FI)designation(Straw Vote Dettloff absent (DM 2) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General designation 89. Northwest RL RL-6.5 R1-O- Change Residential Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Residential corner of Palm (Residential (Residential CZIRL Low Density from 7 with GPAC;designate as recommend change from Low to Open Space-Park Ave.&Island Low Low Density (Residential to 6.5 du/ac(Existing Open Space-Park(OS-P) Residential to Open Space- designation:(OS-P)-Straw Bay Ln.and Density) 6.5 du/ac) Low Density, Open Space Areas) Park(OS-P)designation Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent southwest corner Oil Overlay, (Straw Vote 5-0) of Evening Hill Coastal Dr.&Shady Zone/Residenti Harbor Cir. al Low (Seacliff) Density) (DM 3) City Council adopted 5/13/96 ; 25 (g\genp1n\cc1ndus2) .. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN CON'IITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 90. Northeast corner 1) OS-C MH-F2- 1) RA-0- Change from Open Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff, Retain existing Open of Beach Blvd. (Open 25-SP CC-CZ- Space Conservation, with GPAC;retain recommend retain existing Space-Conservation, &Pacific Coast Space- (Mixed Use FP2 Visitor Serving existing designations to designations to be Commercial Visitor and Highway(White Conservatio Horizontal, (Residential Commercial and be consistent with the consistent with the zoning Residential Medium Hole Area) n;2) VSC Density 0.5 Agriculture,Oil Residential Medium zoning recommendations recommendations made by Density designations:(OS- (Visitor FAR,25 Overlay, Density to Mixed made by the California the California Coastal C,CV,RM)-Straw Vote (DM 14) Serving du/ac, Coastal Use Horizontal Coastal Commission and Commission(Straw Vote 7- 6-0,Dettloff absent Commercial) Specific Conservation, approved by the City 0) 3)&4)RM Plan) Coastal Zone, Council (Residential Floodplain Medium 2) VSC- Density) CZ-FP2 Visitor Serving Commercial, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 3) MH- CZ-FP2 (Mobile home, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 4) M1 -A-O- CZ-FP2 (Industrial Limited,Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone, Floodplain) City Council adopted 5/13/96 26 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING CONINUSSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLA C011�117 I EE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECO\t9TE\llATIONS RECO\i�tENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 11 t 91. Southeast of Mixed RMH-30 North Change from Mixed Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff: Change from Mixed railroad R.O.W. Development (Residential Huntington Use to Residential with GPAC;change to recommend change to Development to Mixed Use &405 Frwy Medium Center Specific Medium Density to. Mixed Use and add Mixed Use and add Specific and add Specific Plan High Density Plan reflect existing Specific Plan Plan(SP)designation designation:(MU-SP)- (DM 15) 30 du/ac) conditions and uses, (Straw Vote 7-0) Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff add Specific Plan absent designation 92. Southwest RM P(RM-15) RM Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Retain existing Residential corner of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to no change to existing recommend retain existing Medium Density Newland St. & Medium underlying Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium designation:(RM-15)- Paseo Cir. Density) Residential Density) Density to identify Density designation Density 15 du/ac and add Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff (between Slater Medium church/school Public(P)designation absent &Talbert) Density 15 (Straw Vote 7-0) du/ac (DM 30) 93. Northwest Planning I-Fl-D MI-A-O- Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff; Change from Planning corner of Reserve (Industrial, CC-CZ-FP2 Planning Reserve to with GPAC; retain recommend retain existing Reserve to Open Space- Hamilton Ave. Density 0.5 (Industrial Industrial existing designations to designations to be Conservation designation: and Newland St. FAR,Design Limited,Oil be consistent with the consistent with the zoning (OS-C)-Straw Vote 6-0, (Part of White Overlay) Overlay, zoning recommendations recommendations made by Dettloff absent Hole area) Coastal made by the California the California Coastal Conservation, Coastal Commission and Commission(Straw Vote 7- (DM 14) Coastal Zone, approved by the City 0) Floodplain) Council City Council adopted 5/13/96 27 (g\genpin\cclndus2) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING CONLNUSSION CITY COUNCIL NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATION, RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 94. 1000'Southeast RL P(CG-Fl) CG/RA Change from Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Change from Residential of Magnolia St. (Residential Public- (Commercial Residential Low provides consistency recommend change to Low to Commercial &Adams Ave. Low underlying Generall Density to between Zoning and Commercial General(CG- General and add Public Density) Commercial Residential Commercial General General Plan Fl)and add Public(P) designation:P(CG)- (DM 7) General, Agriculture) and add Public(P) designation(Straw Vote 7- Straw Vote 6-0,Dettloff Density 0.35 designation to reflect 0)NOTE:portion of site absent;NOTE:portion of FAR existing (RA)inconsistent with site(RA)inconsistent with Church/School zoning zoning 95. South side of RL Western half PS(Public Semi Change from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff- Retain existing Residential. Talbert Ave. (Residential -CG-Fl Public) Residential Low with GPAC: remove from recommend remove from Low D, and add 300'east of Low (Commercial Density to consideration as part of consideration and retain Public designation:P(RL- Beach Blvd. Density) General, Commercial General the General Plan update Residential Low Density 7)-Straw Vote 6-0, (Crest View Density 0.35 on the west one half and retain existing and add Public designation Dettloff absent School) FAR), of the site Residential Low Density (Straw Vote 5-2)NOTE: Eastern half designation on the entire designation is P(RL-7) (DM 40) -RL-6.5 school site-add Public (Residential (P)designation Low Density 6.5 du/ac) 96. Northeast corner RL P(RL 6.5) RL(Residential Add Public(P) Agree with PC&GPAC; Agree with Staff&GPAC: Retain existing Residential of Springdale St. (Residential Public- Low Density) designation to no change to existing recommend retain existing Low Density and add and Heil Ave. Low underlying identify Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Public designation:P(RL- Density) Residential school/church designation,maintain 7.0 7.0 du/ac and add Public 7)-Straw Vote 6-0, (DM 25) Low Density du/ac (P)designation(Straw Vote Dettloff absent 6.5 du/ac 7-0) * Northwest of IG 1-F: IL-H(Limited Modify FAR from Agree with PC,disagree Agree with Staff.modify Retain existing Industrial Springdale St. (Industrial (Inuustrial, Industrial-High F2(.5)to Fla(.75) with GPAC:modify FAR FAR to Fla(.75) designation:(I-172a)-Straw and Bolsa Ave. General) Density 0.5 Rise Overlay) to F2a(.75) Vote 6-0,Dettloff absent lk-TcDonnell FAR) 15'U las site City Council adopted 5/13/96 28 (g\genpin\cclndus2) General Plan Amendment Circulation Element .. :.. 4 Traffic Modeling Highway Network Alternatives Data Comparisons and Analysis .......... ............ Public Works Department Traffic Engineering 16 Traffic Model - Basic Elements Computer Model - a mathematical representation of a real system or condition. Traffic Model - a simulation of a geographic area which relates the social and economic characteristics or the land use and trip production characteristics to the road system in terms of traffic volumes and trip characteristics. (Model Area Map) HIGHWAY NETWORK Node - a location in the system, defined by coordinates, that creates one end of a link. Link - a road segment defined by two nodes, similar to "two points create a line" and with the added ability to assign characteristics to the link (number of lanes, speed, capacity, etc.) Centroid - a point located by coordinates which represents the area within a TAZ, and usually connected to one or more nodes. The land uses within a TAZ are related to the centroid(s) within the TAZ. (Figure 2) TAZ - Traffic Analysis Zone, a uniquely numbered area defined by three or more links, usually containing one or more centroids. (Figure 1) TRIP GENERATION Trip - a one-way movement from an origin to a destination. For example, going to the local store for groceries and going home from the store represent two (2) trips on the road system. Land Use Code - a unique number assigned to a specific land use designation. (Exhibit 1) Trip Generation Rate - the average number of trips which a specific land use will generate in a 24 hour period. 0014405.01 03/25/96 9:38 AM EXTENDED MODELING AREA L II , I _ 1 I t I F!w� 22 , I ! t \ I '\ ✓. AREA I SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING /rtw- COOPERATIVE STUDY Orange County , California HIBIT B . Robert Kahn , John Ka i n t ssocieies, Inc. ce� 14 Vfl Fj di, Ap iq, CL 15 Jill I p to ts 034 Iv. ft;. (-PCOI fill C�e Inc' re 11 ,\ �' +,,}�,t `' sic /Cl o Al- C3. Ol WC-1 R 'Pri e tfr�. su Ilk, -Z ell, Flo% X SARA Trip Generation Table SARA TRIP GENERATION RATES HBW HBNW NHB IHBW HBNW NHB LUC RATE UNIT P1 P2 P3 Al A2 A3 LAND USE DESCRIPTION 110 13 KSF 0 0 26 48 0 26 INDUST.,LIGHT 115 1 KSF 0 0 26 48 0 26 INDUST.,McD-DOUGLAS 150 5 KSF 0 01 261 481 0 26 INDUST.,WAREHOUSE 151 2 KSF 0 0 261 481 0 26 INDUST.,MINIWHSE 170 38 SITE 0 0 26 481 0 26 POWER PLANT 185 20 KSF 0 0 171 331 33 17 INDUST.,NURSERY 200 121DU 22 38 131 51 14 8 RESID LOW 202 9.8 DU 1 20 56 81 01 8 8 RESID MEDIUM 204 8.6 DU 1 20 56 81 01 8 8 RESID MED HI 206 8.6 1 DU 1 201 561 81 01 8 8 RESID HIGH 240 5 DU 20 561 81 01 8 8 RESID TRLR PRK 250 4 DU 15 311 151 01 24 15 RESID RETIRMNT 260 3.16 DU 10 501 101 11 19 10 RESID CONGR. CARE 310 10 RM 0 01 171 201 46 17 HOTEL 320 9 RM 0 01 171 201 46 17 MOTEL 411 6 ACRE 0 01 121 01 76 12 REC,PARK,COMMUNITY 412 5 ACRE 0 01 121 01 6 12 REC,PARK,REGIONAL 413 1 ACRE 0 0 121 01 76 12 REC,PARK,STATE 414 720 KLF 0 01 151 51 65 15 REC,PARK,BEACH 420 41BERTH 1 0 01 171 81 58 17 REC,MARINA 4301 91ACRE 1 0 01 171 81 58 17 REC,GOLF COURSE 440 35 1 KSF 1 0 01 241 4' 48 24 THEATER 492 44 COURT 0 01 171 81 58 17 REC,RACQ BALL CLUB 520 1 STUDENT 0 01 01 101 901 0 SCHOOL, ELEM 5251 0.9 STUDENT 0 01 01 101 901 0 SCHOOL, INTERM 5301 1.41STUDENT1 0 01 01 41 96 0 SCHOOL, HIGH 5401 1.51STUDENT1 0 01 01 41 961 0 SCHOOL, COLLEGE 5661 4.16 SITE 1 0 01 171 331 331 17 CEMETARY 5901 45.5 1 KSF 1 0 01 171 191 47 171LIBRARY 6101 18 KSF 1 0 01 51 321 58 5 HOSPITAL 7101 15 KSF 1 0 01 231 39 15 23 OFFICE PROFESS 7321 25 KSF 1 0 01 261 191 29 26 POST OFFICE 7401 25 1 KSF 1 0 01 261 191 291 26 CIVIC CNTR 8111 411KSF 1 01 01 181 41 601 18 RETAIL, SPECIALTY 8131 15 1 KSF 01 01 261 481 01 26 1 INDUST.,LUMBER/HDWE 8171 351KSF 01 01 ' 181 41 60' 181RETAIL, STRIP 8221 1351KSF 1 01 01 181 41 60 18 RETAIL, NEIGHBOR 8251 70 1 KSF 1 01 01 171 61 60 17 RETAIL, COMMUNITY 8271 50 1 KSF 1 01 01 151 131 57 151RETAIL, REGIONAL 8311 1101KSF 1 01 0' 171 51 61 17 RESTRNT-QUALITY 8321 350 1 KSF 1 01 01 18 j 21 62 18 HI VOLUME CAFE 833 9001KSF ; 01 01 19 11 61 19,FAST FOOD 8411 4001ACRE 1 0 01 171 81 581 17 AUTO DEALER 8441 750 STATION 1 0 01 171 81 58 17 SERVICE STATION 8511 5501KSF j 0 0' 181 41 60 181RETAIL, CONVENIENCE 9311 0.011KSF 01 01 26! 481 0 261 NON STRCT 9321 0.6 STALL 1 01 01 17 8 i 58 17 HORSE STABLE 933 86,KSF 1 01 01 26; 36 12 26 1 REC,SENIOR CNTR 9341 40jKSF 1 01 01 17 81 581 17,REC,HEALTH SPA Pagel 0013352 General Plan Amendment Circulation Element Scenario No. 1 Street system is the completed Master Plan of Arterial Highways • includes the "cross-gap connector" • no Garfield bridge over the Santa Ana River • no Banning bridge over the Santa Ana River Land uses are defined by the "market analysis" plan known as GPAC-3. The Bolsa Chica area is assumed to be developed per Option B of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan . Traffic model predictions indicate that 32 roadway sections and 5 intersections will require careful monitoring. as full development occurs in the community. 0014617.01 M£STUINSTER AV Y P BOLSA AV ARGOSY ►/cFA00E•4 AV (D " EDINCER AV 2i < U_ 0 HEIL AV 1 - OA-&-4 RT DR <m i r m I WARNER AV ► ' Q I SLATER I A`! ! TAL3ER7 I A( m __� _ >y, EL15 AV l � m i m • CAPCIP1 FJ AV I ` !� m m i m 1y \ ADAMS m AV S y/ 3 N — AV " m m a m `c • o • 2 OC�P AVE VIATLANTA� AV LEGEND �r m — 8 LANE MAJOR (DIVIDED) 07- m 3 N wtLTON AV - o LANE MAJOR (DIVIDED) p, " �++�• - 4 LANE PRIMARY (DIVIDED) a asesea — 4 LANE SECONDARY (DIVIDED) sANwNc AV - 2 LANE COLLECTOR ' - CITY BOUNDARY Souce:OKS AsSooiLes,19s. i 2010 CIRCULATION PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS MAP NOTM SCALE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN EIR �5& 1-T 10 5.3-57 v'r-STU114STER AV DKS Associates ® SOLSA AV © I ucrADOEN AV I Nor ® ro SCALE EDwGc"R I AV Jp UI I kOD I HEII AV Z, li I i Ql a WARNER AV 0A`,4 J..7 OR <! == N \ ' U 3I __________-1 SUS AV r 1 7 ..� I Z N ! TAl3c?.T AV cj UI i r rs AV z' { I oaxTDrN AV LEQEND ADA1�S AV © � •�•� ADT EXCEEDS LOS "C" CAPACITY �I — CITY BOUNDARY © — LEVEL OF SERVICE CI IN01ANAP $ AV - N N O Avg A n-AN m AV , r HAUIf`TON AV CROSS GAP CONNECTOR ALTERNATIVE ® SANNINC AV POST YEAR 2010 ROADWAY J SEGMENTS OPERATING AT CITY OF UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HMMNGTON BEACHFicitr Q e-Z- _. T W rC- < < O C a z � .�SEAL (� W_ST".11NSTER BEACH acLsAl� f < _ W Y FAr`CEN ��� � � I � •--i.� rEtl OLJ I I i •—\ WAaNEa FOUNTAIN VALLEY �•\ '. SLA•- s�5 \J sgti '•� COUNTY OF``'• TA1.3c',r GpF9 ORANGE -�. I I wy •�. (80LSA CHICA) I I < 0 J •� — GARFIELD z YORKi OWN A ADAMS r IANAP i IS I No a Legend A f ATUWTA City Boundary alm. HaMlLrcN Roadway Seament Level of Service 4sTti�'� o •••• LOS D f BANNING COSTA Intersection Level of Service ! MESA III:—PM-Peak Hour '• a+LOS !—AM Peak Hour INTERSECTIONS AND ROADWAY SEGMENTS o as OPERATING BELOW LEVEL OF SERVICE C J _ POST GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION � iT g CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN EIR 5.3-53 5.3 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION TABLE T-8 Year 2010 AM and PM Peak Hour LOS at Signalized Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS Bolsa Ave. - Bolsa Chica Rd. 0.68 B 0.73 D Bolsa Ave. - Graham St. 0.38 A 0.55 A Bolsa Ave. - Springdale St. 0.72 B 0.77 C Bolsa Ave. - Edwards St. 0.69 B 0.76 C • t Bolsa Ave. -Golden West St. 0.87 D 1.99 E Edinger Ave. - Bolsa Chica Rd. 0.82 D 0.80 C Edinger Ave. - Graham St. 0.49 A 0.53 A Edinger Ave. - Springdale St. 0.53 A 0.73 C Edinger Ave. -Edwards St. 0.44 A 0.74 C Edinger Ave. Golden West St. 0.49 A 0.83 D Edinger Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.88 D 0.82 D Warner Ave. - PCH 0.86 D 0.73 C Warner Ave. - Bolsa Chica Rd. 0.96 E 0.94 E f Warner Ave. - Graham St. 0.52 A 0.62 C Warner Ave. - Springdale St. 0.57 A 0.63 B Warner Ave. - Edwards St. 0.61 B 0.71 C Warner Ave. -Golden West St. 0.72 C 0.85 D Warner Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.80 C 0.81 D Slater Ave. - Edwards St. 0.62 B 0.62 B Slater Ave. -Golden West St. 0.80 C 0.85 D Slater Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.90 D 0.91' C' Talbert Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.72 C 0.82 D Ellis Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.67 B 0.94 E Garfield Ave. - Golden West St. 0.51 A 0.91 E Yorktown Ave. -Golden West St. 0.61 B 0.77 C Adams Ave. - Beach Blvd. 0.71 C 0.85 D Adams Ave. - Magnolia St. 0.61 B 0.84 D Adams Ave. - Brookhurst St. 0.83 B 0.87 D PCH -Golden West St. 0.70 B 0.70 B PCH- Beach Blvd. 0.58 A 0.80 C PCH - Brookhurst St. 0.68 B 0.66 B Brookhurst St- Hamilton 0.91 E 1.10 F LOS was determined using the intersection operational analysis methodology as described in Chapter 9 of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Source: DKS,Associates,March 21, 1995 HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN EIR 5.3-54 TABLE T-7 2010 Level of Service Summary' Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway x Ratio Daily Classification C Traffic Z Z Adams Avenue 0.45 A 17,(X)0 4-lane primary arterial n Main St. - Beach Blvd. 0.62 B 35,000 6-lane major arterial --4 Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.64 B 36,000 6-lane major arterial O Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.75 C 42,000 6-lane major arterial Z Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.60 B 34,0(10 6-1ane major arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.96 E 54,(X)0 6-1ane major arterial M East of Brookhurst St. a Ln n Algonquin Street x Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.44 A 15,500 4-lane secondary arterial o C) M Atlanta Avenue Z 1st St. - Beach Blvd. 0.64 B 24,000 4-1ane primary arterial M Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.19 A 7,0(X) 4-lane primary arterial p° Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.24 A 9,0(X) 4-lane primary arterial �^ r Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.35 A 13,(X)0 4-lane primary arterial y Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.35 A 13,000 4-11ne primary arterial a � y r Banning Avenue b ZMagnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.17 A 6,000 4-1ane secondary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.20 A 7,0(X) 4-lane secondary arterial a m o z n c� y Source: DKS Associates, 1994. Q) without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. a its TABLE T-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadwa.ySegment` ` V/C LO_S Average Roadway x " Ratio Daily Classification c Trade z zBeach Boulevard 0.48 A 27,000 6-lane major arlerial n PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.53 A 30,000 6-1ane major arterial -4 Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6-1ane major arterial O Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6-1ane major arterial z Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.67 B 38,000 6-1ane major arterial Adams Ave.-Yorktown Ave. 0.85 D 48,000 6-1ane major arterial M Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.69 B 39,000 6-1ane major arterial a Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.72 C 54,000 8-1ane major arterial n Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 B 49,000 8-1ane major arterial x Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.65 0 49,000 8-1ane major arterial n Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.67 11 5(1,000 8-lane major arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.76 C 57,000 8-1ane major arterial z Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. M i %Q Bolsa Chica Street > Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.55 A 31,(H)0 6-1ane major arterial w ~ Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.67 B 38,1H10 6-1ane major arterial 'b Edinger Ave.- McFadden Ave. 0.82 D 46,000 6-lane major arterial N r McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.83 D 47,(H)0 6-lane major arterial o ZBolsa Ave. - Rancho Ave. 0.99 E 56,1H11) 6-1ane major arterial y �s m Bolsa Avenue Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.14 A 8,OM) 6-lane major arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.21 A 12,000 6-lane major arterial Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.44 A 25,000 6-lane major arterial n Edwards St. -Golden West St. 0.62 B 35,000 6-lane major arterial 0 --------------------------------- • without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Gap Connector. TABLE T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary" Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway ;} x Za io Daily Classification C Traffic z -i Brookhurst Street PCH - Bushard St. 0.34 A 19,(H)0 6-lane major arterial Z z Bushard St. - Banning Ave. 0.14 A 8,()()() 6-lane major arterial ,) Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.32 A 18,(X)0 6-lane major arterial O Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.36 A 20,(H)O 6-lane major arterial z Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.41 A 23,000 6-lane major arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.91 E 51,000 6-1ane major arterial °d Adams Ave.- Yorktown Ave. 0.82 D 46,000 6-1ane major arterial "y Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.92 L'• 52,000 6-1ane major arterial Y n Bushard Street NBrookhurst St. - Banning; Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial t1 Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.25 A 9,11OO Cline secondary arterial r`" Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.25 A 9,()Ol1 4-lane secondary arterial z z Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.34 A 12,000 4-1ane secondary arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.39 A 14,(H)O 4-lane secondary arterial Y Adams Ave. -Yorktown Ave. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial r' Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial a r Delaware Street b Y PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.28 A Ill,000 Clare secondary arterial z Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.28 A Ill,(H)O Cline secondary arterial a M Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.14 A 5,000 Cline secondary arterial �. Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.08 A 3,0(x) 4-lane secondary arterial Adams Ave.-Yorktown Ave. 0.14 A 5,000 4-lane §rcendary arterial n Yorktown Ave. -Garfield Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial n Garfield Ave. - Main St. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial r_ Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial O z --------------------------------- without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Gap Connector. �► wry , � �, ,� !�� �, am, TABLE T-7 (cont.) r 2010 Level of Service Summary' :i G' Roadway Segmenl V/C 1 OS Average Roadway atio Daily Classification Traffic z Edinger Avenue Z Sunset Way E. -Saybrook Ln. 0.21 A 8,(H)t) 4-lane, primary arterial n Saybrook Ln. - Fantasia Ln. 0.61 13 23,000 4-lane primary iuterial --t Fantasia Ln. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.61 B 23,000 4-lane primary arterial !; O Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.45 A 17,(H)O 4-lane primary arterial z Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.61 B 23,000 4-1ane primary arterial i Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.55 A 31,000 6-lane major arterial M Edwards St. -Gulden West St. 0.75 C 42,(H)O 6-1ane major arterial Y Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.78 C 44,(X)t) 6-1ane major arterial n Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.75 C 42,(X)0 6-lane major arterial E Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.71 C 40,000 6-lane major arterial • w C) M Edwards Street z Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arterial M Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial 7° Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial � a w Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-1ane secondary arterial y Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial a "a Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.65 13 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.76 C 27,000 4-lane. secondary arterial o z McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.67 B 24,(H)0 4-lane secondary arterial Bolsa Ave. - Westminster Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 Clare secondary arterial A M O n hC, Y O • without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Gap Connector. TAI3LG T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway x Italia Daily Classification C Traffic z Ellis Avenue z Edwards St. - Golden West St. 0.35 A 13,000 4-1ane primary arterial n Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.19 A 7,000 4-lane primary arterial --t Gothard St. - Delaware St. 0.34 A 12,000 4-1ane secondary arterial S O Delaware St. - Main St. (Beach Blvd.) 0.20 A 7,000 4-lane secondary arterial z Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.84 D 30,000 4-lane secondary arterial M Garfield Avenue > Edwards St. -Golden West St. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane major arterial „ n Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.64 B 36,(1)0 6-lane major arterial w x Gothard St. - Main St. 0.55 A 31,11O() 6-lane major arterial 0 Main St. - Delaware St. 0.67 B 25,(N)O 4-1ane primary arterial r" Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.83 D 31,000 4-1ane primary arterial z Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 1.07 I., 40,000 4-lane primary arterial �*+ Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.83 D 31,000 4-1ane primary arterial Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.53 A 20,(X)0 4-lane primary arterial `^ Y Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.45 A 17,000 4-lane primary arterial ~ Brookhurst St. - Ward St. 0.51 A 19,000 4-lane primary arterial r y a o z a rn �. ) c 0 z * without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Gap Connector. 9" 4am N'' mm 'ICY 'wm 7AW m7 , V� ARNO Iwo" gem one" ftm�, r �a Iran is as a, n a- N. ra, NJ a. ■ 01 a. r, � TABLE T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary" Roadway Se.&men1 f V/C LOS Average Roadway xRatio Daily Classification [ braffi z Golden West Street zPCH -Orange Ave. 0.43 A 24,000 6-1ine major arterial C) Palm Ave. - Palm Ave. 0.44 A 25,000 6-lane major arterial ...t Palm Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6-lane major arterial 0 Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.59 A 33,000 6-1ane major arterial Z Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.55 A 31,000 6-lane major arterial Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.53 A 3O,000 6-1ane major arterial °a Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.57 A 32,000 6-lane major arterial M y Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.52 A 29,(H)O 6-1ane major arterial r1 Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.69 B 39,0110 6-lane major arterial is x Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.67 B 38,000 6-lane major arterial ��„ Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.80 C 45,(H)0 6-1ane major arlr-rial McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.78 C 44,000 6-lane major arterial Z M Gothard Street W Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.20 A 7,000 4-1ane secondary arterial � Y Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.36 A 13,(X)O 4-lane secondary arterial ` r' Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial y 10 Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial r' Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.81 D 29,(N)(I 4-lane secondary arterial Y Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 1.12 F 40,000 4-lane secondary arterial L Edinger Ave. -Center Ave. 0.93 fi 33,11()0 4-lane secondary arterial a M Center Ave.- McFadden Ave. 1.35 I: 48,(X)O 4-lane secondary arterial o n r) c 0 --------------------------------- • without Garfield and Banning Bridges,with Cross Gap Connector. '.I TABLET-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summary" Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway Ratio Daily Classification Traffic z `i Graham Street z Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.25 A 9,0011 4-1ane secondary arterial 0 Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial -i Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.22 A 8,000 4-lane secondary arterial O Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial z McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial by Hamilton Avenue > Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.43 A 16,(N)O 4-lane primary arterial �„ r1 Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.83 D 31,000 4-lane primary arterial x Magnolia St. - Bushard St, 0.72 C 27,(H)0 4-lane primary arterial o. t, Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.75 C 28,000 4-lane primary arterial M z Heil Avenue M Saybrook Ln.- Algonquin St. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial 7o Algonquin St. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.39 A 14,1H10 4-1ane secondary arterial �^ Y Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial r Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.84 D 30,000 4-lane secondary arterial a Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial y DEdwards St. - Golden West St. 0.67 B 24,()l)ll 4-lane secondary arterial o z Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.56 A 20,(X)0 4-lane secondary arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.45 A 16,00() 4-lane secondary arterial a M Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane secondary arterial n n c 0 --------------------------------- without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. 1,6W IMI M M O M M O M M M no M M mama TABLE T-7 (coat.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadway Segment. V/C LOS Average Roadway t t'o Daily Classification Traffic C z Indianapolis Avenue -i Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.80 C' Il),luo 2-Line commuter z Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.34 A I1,U()O 4-lane secondary arterial n Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.65 B 23,(X)(1 4-1ine secondary arterial --1 Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.59 A 21,(X)(1 4-1ane secondary arterial O Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial z Lake Street PCH - Atlanta Ave. 0.35 A 13,000 4-1ane primary arterial y Atlanta Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.29 A 11,(X)() 4-1ane primary arterial �, rl Adams Ave. -Yorktown Ave. 0.37 A 14,1X)O 4-lane primary arterial w x t1 Magnolia Street M PCH - Banning Ave. 0.19 A 7,000 4-lane primary arterial z Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.19 A 7,000 4-lane primary arterial rn Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.45 A 17,(X)O 4-lane primary arterial � W Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.64 B 24,(X)0 4-1ane primary arterial �•, D Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.53 A 20,000 4-lane primary arterial y r Adams Ave. -Yorktown Ave. 0.59 A 22,000 4-lane primary arterial A "7 Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.75 C 28,000 4-lane primary arterial r 'e > Main Street z a Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.69 B 26,000 6-lane major arterial y M Garfield Ave. - Delaware St. 0.77 C 29,000 4-lane primary arterial o Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.66 B 37,000 4-lane primary arterial n r O • without Garfield and Banning Bridles, with Cross Cap Connector. TABLE T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway Ratio Daily Clas9i ication x Traffic C Z McFadden Avenue -i Balsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.17 A 6,O00 4-lane secondary arterial z Graham St. - Springdale St. O.51 A IIt,om) 4-lane secondary arterial 0 Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.70 B 25,000 4-lane secondary arterial —� Edwards St. -Golden West St. 0.81 D 29,000 4-lane secondary arterial j O Golden West St. -Gothard St. 0.70 C 25,000 4-lane secondary arterial z Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial vd r,y Newland Street y PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.36 A 13,00O 4-lane secondary arterial n Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane secondary arterial �; cn x Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.51 A 18,000 4-lane secondary arterial JL 00 Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial Adams Ave. -Yorktown Ave. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial z Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.79 C 28,000 4-lane secondary arterial m Garfield Ave. - Eillis Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 13 23,(X)O 4-lane secondary arterial Y Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial y Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.53 A I9,(X)O 4-1ane secondary arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. O.51 A 18,11O0 4-lane secondary arterial O 7 Orange Avenue y Golden West St. - 17th St. 0.20 A 7,11(X) Cline secondary arterial ti nn 17th St. - 6th St. 0.81 D 29,000 4-lane secondary arterial n C --------------------------------- • without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. room rKrTY loom 7ft rvl� it r M1.MM 0M 40M IMOR mom WwW Ai 6=w Pon" M-M w..., tM A M IK A RI M M M A M a R m a n 1 TABLE T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway x Ratio Daily Classification C Traffic z 'i PCH zNorth of Warner Ave. 1.52 1- 57,111111 4-lane primary arterial t7 Warner Ave. - Sea Point St. 1.31 1-. 49,000 4-lane primary arterial .-i Sea Point St. - Golden West St. 1.15 F 43,000 4-lane primary arterial O Golden West St. - 17th St. 0.78 C 44,(H)0 6-lane major arterial z 17th St. - 6th St. 0.69 B 39,000 6-1ane major arterial 6th St. - Lake St. 0.76 C 43,(H)O E,-lane major arterial Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.80 C 45,(X)0 6-lane major arterial y Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.85 D 48,000 6-lane major arterial n Beach Blvd. - Newland Ave. 0.75 C 42,(X)0 6-lane major arterial x Newland Ave. - Magnolia Ave. 0.83 D 47,000 6-lane major arterial ,o Magnolia Ave. - Brookhurst St. 0.87 D 49,111111 6-lane major arterial M South of Brookhurst St. 1.19 1- 67,000 6-1ane major arterial z M Saybrook Lane W Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.31 A l l,()(10 4-lane secondary arterial a r Slater Avenue a ,a Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.11 A 4,000 4-lane secondary arterial r Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial o Edwards St. - Golden West St. 0.53 A 19,O1111 4-lane secondary arterial Golden West St. -Gothard St. 0.56 A 20,(H)0 4-lane secondary arterial a M Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.53 A 19,()(10 4-1ane secondary arterial Q n 1 • 1 C ti O Z --------------------------------- without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. TABLET-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary* Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway x Italio Daily Classification c Traffic z i -i Springdale Street z Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.64 13 24,000 4-lane primary arterial n Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.80 C 30,000 4-lane primary arterial •i Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial O Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.80 C 30,000 4-lane primary arterial z Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.69 13 26,(K)0 4-1ane primary arterial McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.96 E 36,000 4-lane primary arterial North of Bolsa Ave. 1.15 F 43,000 4-lane primary arterial h Y Talbert Avenue w x Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.24 A 9,O()O 4-lane primary arterial o Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.32 A 12,000 4-lane primary arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.48 A 18,000 4-lane primary arterial z to Ward Street 7o Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.31 A 11,(H)O 4-lane secondary arterial �^ D w r Warner Avenue PCH - Algonquin St. 0.57 A 32,000 6-lane major arterial r Algonquin St. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.67 B 38,000 6-lane major arterial b zBolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.73 C 41,000 6-lane major arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.67 B 38,(x)O 6-lane major arterial y M Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.53 A 30,000 6-lane major arterial Edwards St. -Golden West St. 0.59 A 33,000 6-lane major arterial z Golden West St. - Gothard St. 0.67 B 38,000 6-1ane major arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.82 D 46,000 6-lane major arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.83 D 47,000 6-lane major arterial Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.99 E 56,000 6-lane major arterial y 0 --------------------------------- without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Gap Connector. •1111�1 MOM "van PiA %Wliw Iwmow rNow" .N..N Uri. ow� .—s ....� ..+.... ...r.. ...r.. ....--. owns " no nnannnam am a FABLE T-7 (cont.) 2010 Level of Service Summary" x Roadway Segment V/C LOS Average Roadway C Ratio Daily Classification z Traffic -i Yorktown Avenue ~ z Golden West St. - Main St. 0.77 C 29,000 4-Line primary arterial C) Main St. - Lake St. 0.56 A 20,000 4-1.111e secunda.'y arterial H Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial O Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial z Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arterial m Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial y Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.76 C 27,000 4-lane secondary arterial rl Brookhurst St. - Ward St. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial w � v' 17th Street C) PCH -Orange Ave. 0.29 A 11,000 4-lane primary arterial z Orange Ave. - Palm Ave. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial m Palm Ave. - Main St. 0.48 A 18,()O() 4-lane primary arterial �0 V. y r � Y C r ti Y O m O 7c1 n n c O • without Garfield and Banning Bridges, with Cross Cap Connector. General Plan Amendment Circulation Element Scenario No. 2 Street system is the completed Master Plan of Arterial Highways • includes the "loop connector" road (Orange Co. Bolsa Chica development plan) • no Garfield bridge over the Santa Ana River • no Banning bridge over the Santa Ana River Land uses are defined by the "market analysis" plan known as GPAC-3. The Bolsa Chica area is assumed to be developed per Option B of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan . Traffic model predictions indicate that 29 roadway sections and 4 intersections will require careful monitoring as full development occurs in the community. 0014617.01 M£STNINSTER AV d° D A. ' Associates ® SOLSA AV `C/ i uCFADOEN AV NOT N TO SCALE EDINGER AV J " I Y = �• O .: v HflL AV • V1 2 OANPORT DR < ml WARNER AV I£ < V1 r ,\ \ ------------- 3.� SLATu"t AV C ■ ZCAN \� OZ C of ■ a c r N r < 0 .o TALBERT Av P9lW Z c► EL1JS AV 7 � 1 i Vl 40 . i 0 © GARFl AV �� q OR✓,TOY#M AV < ! LEGEND ADAMs A© © % r — ADT EXCEEDS LOS "C" CAPACITY CITY BOUNDARY ` — LEVEL OF SERVICE 4 �,yC CI INDIANAPCiS AV / � o Y %O��b AvE A PLAN TA m AV O , co CROSS GAP LOOP HAMILTON AV ALTERNATIVE BANNING AV i POST YEAR 2010 ROADWAY SEGMENTS OPERATING AT CfTY OF J UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HUNTINGTON BEACH Q e v,ESTutNSTIEER AV *� DII(S Associates BOLSA AV IAcFADOEN AV I NOT TO SCALE N EDWC£'i AV z < U D AV , \ N WAMNE? AV 0AAJ ..T OR N � SLR► AV -------------- z 411 � ► ; '^ i TALE ER AV z C < 0 \�•� ELLIS AV '�� •• 1 1 C7� V~1 ,.d \•ti ri , T ARFIELD AV # .• m f a fYORKTOV4 AV / z LEGEND / - INTI=RSECTION OPERATING WORSE '►D Ws AV THAN LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" DURING ; AM AND/OR PM PEAK HOURS 0 J WOIANAp �5 AV k C � _ I E• o 1 O � 0 - CITY BOUNDARY 00 AVE ATL.ANTAm AV op , } O < "C ~ ! CROSS GAP LOOP MALILTON AV ALTERNATIVE • .Q���� - POST YEAR 1O FADCQ, SANMNC AV 20" Sl INTERSECTIONS OPERATING AT CITY OF "`� % UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HUNTINGTON BEACH ! r MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Revised) Page 6 TABLE 1 INTERSECTION I.EVEI. OF SERVICE SUMMARY FOR POST YEAR 2010 ALTERNATIVES ISUILD-OUT TO MPAIi WITHOUT MITIGATION Cross Gap Connector Alternative Cross Gap Loop Alternative AM Peak Hour I'M Peak hour AM Peak Hour I'M Peak Hour Intersection V/C Ratio LOS Y1C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS Bolsa Ave./Bolsa Chica St. 0.68 B 0.73 C 0.68 13 0.72 C Bolsa Ave./Graham St. 0.38 A 0.55 A 0.38 A 0.55 A 13olsa Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.72 C 0.77 C 0.72 C 0.77 C Bolsa Ave./Edwards St. 0.69 B 0.76 C 0.69 It d.76 C DOW 'Aved(3010enwest St l 0.87 D0 99 Is 0.87 13 0.98 13 Edinger Ave./Bolsa Chica St. 0.82 D 0.80 C 0.82 D 0.81 D Edinger Ave./Graham St. 0.49 A 0.53 A 0.50 A 0.53 A Edinger Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.53 A 0.75 C 0.53 A 0.75 C Edinger Ave./Edwards St. 0.44 A 0.74 C b.44 A 0.74 C Edinger Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.49 A 0.83 D 0.49 A 0.83 D Edinger Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.88 D 0.82 D 0.88 D 0.82 D Warner Ave./PCH 0.86 D 0.73 C 0.87 D 0.74 C Walnor''Ave:%13alaa Chica St 0 9b 0`.9h ;:'. X; : 0.99;. E 0.98 !a MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Revised) Page 7 TABLE 1 (Cont.) Cross Gap Connector Alternative Cross Gap Loop Alternative AM I'ealc Ilour I'M Peak Your AM Peak Hour I'M Pu►k Hour Intersection YLQ Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS Warner Ave./Graham St. 0.52 A 0.62 C 0.54 A 0.62 B Warner Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.57 A 0.65 B 0.57 A 0.67 B Warner Ave./Edwards St. 0.61 13 0.71 C 0.62 13 0.71 C Warner Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.72 C 0.85 D 0.74 C 0.85 D Warner Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.80 C 0.81 D 0.80 C 0.81 D Slater Ave./Edwards St. 0.62 13 0.62 13 0.65 13 0.62 l3 Slater Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.80 C 0.85 D 0.80 C 0.85 D Slater Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.90 D 0.91, C1 0.90 1) 0.91, CI Talbert Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.72 C 0.82 D 0.72 C 0.82 D Ellis Ave./peach Blvd. 0.67' f3 Q 94 I; r0.67 11 0.94 ):,. Garfield Ave./Goldeiwegt:'St.° MV . A b 9a 0.49 A 0.86 D , Yorktown Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.61 B 0.77 C 0.61 B 0.76 C Adams Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.71 C 0.85 D 0.71 C 0.87 D Adams Ave./Magnolia St. 0.61 B 0.84 D 0.61 B 0.84 D MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Revised) Page 8 TABLE 1 (Cont.) Cross Gap Connector Alternative Cross (:ap Loop Allernative AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour I'M Peak Hour Intersection V ' Rati LQj V/C Ratio LOS V/ Ratio LOS V/C Ratio LOS Adams Ave./Brookhurst St. 0.83 D 0.87 D 0.83 D 0.87 D PCH/Goldenwest St. 0.70 B 0.70 13 0.71 C 0.71 C PCH/Beach Blvd. 0.58 A 0.80 C 0.58 A 0.80 C PCH/Brookhurst St. 0.68 B 0.66 B 0.67 B 0.66 B r3xookhu�at Sc /Fttiiltao Si. 0:9r 'ri 0.9.i Level of Service was determined using the intersection operational analysis methodology, as described in Chapter 9 of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. >r MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 (Revised) Page 9 TABLE 2 INTERSECTION LEVEL OIL' SERVICE SUMMARY FOR YEAR 2010 MITIGATED INTERSECTIONS BUILD-OUT BEYOND MPAII W1TII MITIGATION Cross Gap Connector Alternative Cross Gap Loop Allerualive AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Flour PM Peak Dour Intersection V C Ratio LOS Y&jtatiq LOS V/C Ratio L S LC Ratio LOS V Beach Blvd./Ellis Ave. 0.60 A 0.86 D 0.60 A 0.84 D Bolsa Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.71 C 0.85 D 0.71 C 0.85 D Brookhurst St./Hamilton Ave. 0.69 B 0.81 D 0.70 B 0.81 C Bolsa Chica St./Warner Ave. 0.44 A 0.79 C 0.44 A 6.79 C Garfield Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.47 A 0.67 B 0.48 A 0.68 B 1 11 1 General Plan Amendment Circulation Element Scenario No. 3 Street system is the existing Huntington Beach street system • no "cross-gap connector" • no Gothard to Hoover connection link • no Hamilton extension from Beach to Newland • no Pacific View Avenue extension from 1st Street to Beach • no Garfield bridge over the Santa Ana River • no Banning bridge over the Santa Ana River Land uses are defined by the "market analysis" plan known as GPAC-3. The Bolsa Chica area is assumed to be developed per Option B of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan . Traffic model predictions indicate that 32 roadway sections and 6 intersections will require careful monitoring as full development occurs in the community. 001461701 MEST►AHSTER AV � DAL"SA Assodates 80LSA AV I YcFADOEN AV NOT ®' TOSCALE t _ EDWGER AV HEX AV to ® WARMER AV DA vtT oa \ \--------------' N SLATER AV V5 Z N H •. � r � N t TALBOT AV cr 7n lW C 02 J v ELLIS AV � i c . AV n yow TONN AV R ►- / LEGEND i N N 'y AV ® �� — ADT EXCEEDS LOS "C" CAPACITY CITY BOUNDARY ? f � txC�a �' :::tA02AMS MOIAN N AV ® ® — LEVEL OF SERVICE T N ^,1 'v11(+lry L1 t 00 A� ATLANTA AV NO UNFUNCIM ROADS AND r ... ® _ MAJALTOM AV f NO BOLSA CHICA LOWLANDS DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE . SAMNING AV ! POST YEAR 2= ROADWAY SEGMENTS OPERAT�VG T C" OF �, 1 A ! UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HUNTINGTON BEACH �. Figure 1 II %WST"STER AV DKS Assocla* tes q. BO SA AV • i i mcFADOEN AV NOT r TOSCALE EDWGER AV U_ AV N 1\ N WARNER AV DAVE?�ORT OR ` p i SLATER I AV a � N ig TALBERT AV �0 ELUS AV A C� ••'` W m ; ORXTDNti AV I-EGE D �� • — INTERSECTION OPERATING WORSE A°Aus AV THAN LEVEL OF SERVICE "D" DURING 3 -.AlAM AND/OR PM PEAK HOURS fit` p All — CITY BOUNDARY � N 10 AVE ATLANTA AV cc NO UNFUNDED ROADS AND # � MAI/ILTQM AV NO BOL.SA ChICA LOWLANDS W DEVELOPMB417 ALTERNATIVE BANNWC AV POST YEAR 2010 NTEMECCps TIONS OPERATING AT C " OF UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS HUNTINGTON BEACH '�� FiBtra 3 HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN `! Average V/C Daily Roadway Ii Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification f Level of Service Summary of GPAC 3 Post 2010 No Unfunded Roads and No Bolsa Chica Development liAdams Avenue it Main St. - Beach Blvd. 0.43 A 16,000 4-lane primary arterial N I Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.62 B 35,000 6-lane major arterial Il Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.64 B 36,000 6-!ane major arterial �I i Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.75 C 42,000 6-lane major arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.60 B 34,000 6-lane major arterial East of Brookhurst St. 0.94 E 53,000 6-lane najor arterial i iAlgonquin Street Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial Atlanta Avenue 1 st St. Beach Blvd. 0.75 C 28,000 4-lane primary arterial II Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.37 A 14,000 4-lane primary arterial Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.37 A 14,000 4-lane primary arterial Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.43 A 16,000 4-lane primary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.43 A 16,000 4-lane primary arterial Banning Avenue Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.17 A 6.000 4-lane secondary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.17 A 6,000 4-lane secondary arterial 1�Beach Boulevard PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.48 A 27,000 6-lane major arterial it Hamilton Ave. = Atlanta Ave. 0.48 A 27.000 6-lane najor arterial Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.71 C 40,000 6-lane major arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.69 B 39,000 6-lane major arterial iAdams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.66 B 37,000 6-lane major arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.83 D 47,000 6-lane major arterial i� Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.71 C 40.000 6-lane major arterial II Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.72 C 54,000 8-lane maior arterial Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.65 B 49,000 8-lane major arterial Slater Ave. - Wamer Ave. 0.65 B 49,000 8-lane major arterial II Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.67 B 50,000 8-lane major arterial I� Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.77 C 58.000 8-lane maior arterial Bolsa Chica Street Wamer Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.53 A 30,000 6-lane major arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.69 B 39.000 6-lane major arterial Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.82 D 46.000 6-lane major arterial McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.83 D 47,000 6-lane major arterial 1 Bolsa Ave. - Rancho Ave. 1.01 F 57,000 6-lane major arterial I i Pagel f HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN Average VIC Daily Roadway Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification Bolsa Avenue i Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.14 A 8.000 6-lane major arterial II Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.21 A 12,000 6-lane major arterial I Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.46 A 26,000 6-lane major arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.71 C 40,000 6-lane major arterial i Brookhurst Street �l PCH - Bushard St. 0.34 A 19,000 6-lane major arterial �I j Bushard St. - Banning Ave. 0.14 A 8.000 6-lane major arterial Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.32 A 18,000 6-lane major arterial II II Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.41 A 23,000 6-lane major arterial II Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.39 A 22,000 6-lane major arterial I� i Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.91 E 51.000 6-lane major arterial Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.83 D 47,000 6-lane major arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.94 E 53,000 6-lane major arterial i, Bushard Street Brookhurst St. - Banning Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial l Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.34 A 12.000 4-lane secondary arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial I II Delaware Street PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.11 A 4,000 4-lane secondary arterial Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.11 A 4,000 4-lane secondary arterial Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.14 A 5,000 4-lane secondary arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.08 A 3,000 4-lane secondary arterial Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.14 A 5,000 4-lane secondary arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial Garfield Ave. - Main St. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial �i Edinger Avenue Sunset Way E. - Saybrook Ln. 0.21 A 8,000 4-lane primary arterial II Savbrook Ln. - Fantasia Ln. 0.61 B 23.000 4-lane primary arterial ! j Fantasia Ln. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.61 B 23,000 4-lane primary arterial Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.45 A 17,000 4-lane primary arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.61 B 23.000 4-lane primary arterial ij Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.52 A 29,000 6-lane major arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.69 B 39.000 6-lane major arterial Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.69 B 39,000 6-lane major arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.75 C 42,000 6-lane major arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St, 0.76 C 43,000 6-lane major arterial I Edwards Street Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.45 A 16.000 4-lane secondary arterial i Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.62 B 22.000 4-lane secondary arterial Page 2 HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN Average V/C Daily Roadway i Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial i� Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.36 A 13.000 4-lane secondary arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.79 C 28,000 4-lane secondary arterial McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.81 D 29,000 4-lane secondary arterial Bolsa Ave. - Westminster Ave. 0.67 B 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial ii Ellis Avenue II i Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.32 A 12,000 4-lane primary arterial ll Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.19 A 7,000 4-lane primary arterial { II Gothard St. - Delaware St. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial Delaware St. - Main St. (Beach E 0.11 A 4,000 4-lane secondary arterial ' Beach BYd. - Newland St. 0.84 D 30.000 4-lane secondary arterial Garfield Avenue Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane major arterial II Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.64 B 36,000 6-lane major arterial fl i Gothard St. - Main St. 0.57 A 32,000 6-lane major arterial Main St. - Delaware St. 0.69 B 26,000 4-lane primary arterial Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.85 D 32,000 4-lane primary arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 1.07 F 40,000 4-lane primary arterial Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.83 t ' 31,000 4-lane primary arterial Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial i Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.48 A 18.000 4-lane primary arterial Brookhurst St. - Ward St. 0.51 A 19,000 4-lane primary arterial i Goldenwest Street i PCH - Orange Ave. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane major arterial Orange Ave. - Palm Ave. 0.43 A 24,000 6-lane major arterial + i� Palm Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.69 B 39,000 6-lane major arterial ' Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.57 A 32,000 6-lane major arterial Garfield Ave. - Ellis Ave. 0.52 A 29.000 6-lane major arterial �I Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.52 A 29.000 6-lane maior arterial 1 l j Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.55 A 31,000 6-lane major arterial Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.53 A 30,000 6-lane major arterial j Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.69 B 39.000 6-lane major arterial iI ( Heil Ave. Edinger Ave. 0.67 B 38,000 6-lane major arterial f Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.78 C 44.000 6-11ane major arterial II McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.96 E 54,000 6-lane major arterial 'i Gothard Street Main St. - Ellis Ave. 0.17 A 6.000 4-lane secondary arterial Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.39 A 14.000 4-lane secondary arterial Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.51 A 18,000 4-lane secondary arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.70 C 25,000 4-lane secondary arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.95 E 34,000 4-lane secondary arterial i Edinger Ave. - Center Ave. 0.59 A 21.000 4-lane secondary arterial j Center Ave. - McFadden Ave. 1.04 F 37.000 4-lane secondary arterial r ' Page 3 HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN Average V/C Daily Roadway :Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification ,I Graham Street I, Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.20 A 7,000 4-lane secondary arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.51 A 18.000 4-lane secondary arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.17 A 6.000 4-lane secondary arterial Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.42 A 15.000 4-lane secondary arterial 'i McFadden Ave. - Bolsa Ave. 0.42 A 15,000 4-lane secondary arterial �I Hamilton Avenue Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.00 A 0 4-lane primary arterial itNewland St. - Magnolia St. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial II Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.51 A 19,000 4-11ane primary arterial Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial jHeil Avenue j Saybrook Ln. - Algonquin St. 0.25 A 9,000 4-lane secondary arterial I Algonquin St. - Bolsa Chica St. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.81 D 29,000 4-lane secondary arterial Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.65 B 23.000 4-lane secondary arterial ` j Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.45 A 16,000 4-lane secondary arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial it Indianapolis Avenue Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.80 C 11,000 2-lane commuter II l Beach Blvd. Newland St. 0.34 A 12,000 4-lane secondary arterial i,I Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.67 B 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial i1 Magnolia St. - Bushard St. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial it Bushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial j I II Lake Street !I PCH - Atlanta Ave. 0.40 A 15,000 4-lane primary arterial Atlanta Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.32 A 12.000 4-lane primary arterial I ii Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.37 A 14,000 4-lane primary arterial liMagnolia Street PCH - Banning Ave. 0.21 A 8,000 4-lane primary arterial Banning Ave. - Hamilton Ave. 0.19 A 7.000 4-lane primary arterial !� Hamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.48 A 18,000 4-lane primary arterial Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.64 B 24,000 4-lane primary arterial Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.53 A 20,000 4-lane primary arterial Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.75 C 28,000 4-lane primary arterial it Main Street it Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.72 C 27.000 4-lane primary arterial f Garfield Ave. - Delaware St. 0.77 C 29.000 4-lane primary arterial Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.66 B 37,000 4-lane primary arterial f Page 4 HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN i; Average V/C Daily Roadway Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification II I McFadden Avenue Solsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.17 A 6,000 4-lane secondary arterial Graham St. - Springdale St, 0,48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.67 B 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.70 C 25.000 4-lane secondary arterial Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.67 B 24,000 4-lane secondary arterial II Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.90 D 32,000 4-lane secondary arterial �I ji. ii Newland Street PCH - Hamilton Ave. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial IIHamilton Ave. - Atlanta Ave. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial it Atlanta Ave. - Indianapolis Ave. 0.53 A 19.000 4-lane secondary arterial I� �I Indianapolis Ave. - Adams Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial Adams Ave. - Yorktown Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial II Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.79 C 28,000 4-lane secondary arterial iGarfield Ave. - Eillis Ave. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial Ellis Ave. - Talbert Ave. 0.65 B 23,000 4-lane secondary arterial I Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.62 B 22,000 4-lane secondary arterial Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial ;I Orange Avenue Goldenwest St. - 17th St. 0.20 A 7,000 4-lane secondary arterial 17th St. - 6th St. 0.84 D 30,000 4-lane secondary arterial IPCH i North of Wamer Ave. 1.52 F 57,000 4-lane primary arterial i E i Warner Ave. - Sea Point St. 1.31 F 49,000 4-lane primary arterial Sea Point St. - Golden West St. 1.15 F 43,000 4-lane primary arterial Goldenwest St. - 17th St. 0.76 C 43,000 6-lane major arterial ' 17th St. - 6th St. 0.67 B 38,000 6-lane major arterial 6th St. - Lake St. 0.76 C 43,000 6-lane major arterial Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.76 C 43,000 6-lane major arterial Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.92 E 52,000 6-lane major arterial i Beach Blvd. - Newland Ave. 0.87 D 49,000 6-lane major arterial it Newland Ave. - Magnolia Ave. 0.89 D 50.000 6-lane major arterial i Magnolia Ave. - Brookhurst St. 0.92 E 52.000 6-lane major arterial Ii j South of Brookhurst St. 1.24 F 70,000 6-lane major arterial II Saybrook Lane iI 1 I Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial Slater Avenue i I Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.14 A 5,000 4-lane secondary arterial Springdale St. - Edwards St. 0.45 A 16.000 4-lane secondary arterial Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.51 A 18.000 4-lane secondary arterial Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.53 A 19.000 4-lane secondary arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.53 A 19,000 4-lane secondary arterial Page 5 HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN 1 Average 1 r I V/C Daily Roadway i Roadway Segment Ratio LOS Traffic Classification I itSpringdale Street Talbert Ave. - Slater Ave. 0.64 B 24,000 4-lane primary arterial ICI Slater Ave. - Warner Ave. 0.83 C 31,000 4-lane p rimary arterial !I Warner Ave. - Heil Ave. 0.59 A 22,000 4-lane primary arterial Heil Ave. - Edinger Ave. 0.77 C 29,000 4-lane primary arterial Edinger Ave. - McFadden Ave. 0.72 C 27,000 4-lane primary arterial McFadden Ave. - Boisa Ave. 0.96 E 36,000 4-lane primary arterial II North of Boisa Ave. 1.17 F 44,000 4-lane primary arterial j I' �I Talbert Avenue Goldenwest St. - Gothard St. 0.24 A 9,000 4-lane primary arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.35 A 13.000 4-lane primary arterial j Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.48 A 18,000 4-lane primary arterial Ward Street Yorktown Ave. - Garfield Ave. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial Warner Avenue PCH - Algonquin St. 0.62 B 35.000 6-lane major arterial Algonquin St. - Boisa Chica St. 0.67 B 38.000 6-lane major arterial { Bolsa Chica St. - Graham St. 0.73 C 41,000 6-lane major arterial Graham St. - Springdale St. 0.67 B 38,000 6-lane major arterial 4 Springdale St. Edwards St. 0.53 A 30,000 6-lane major arterial I Edwards St. - Goldenwest St. 0.60 B 34,000 6-lane major arterial Goldenwest St. Gothard St. 0.66 B 37,000 6 lane major arterial Gothard St. - Beach Blvd. 0.82 D 46,000 6-lane major arterial Beach Blvd. - Newland St. 0.85 D 48,000 6-lane major arterial Newland St. - Magnolia St. 1.01 F 57,000 6-lane major arterial i Yorktown Avenue Goldenwest St. - Main St. 0.77 C 30,000 4-lane primary arterial Main St. - Lake St. 0.56 A 20,000 4-lane secondary arterial Lake St. - Delaware St. 0.36 A 13,000 4-lane secondary arterial 1 Delaware St. - Beach Blvd. 0.31 A 11,000 4-lane secondary arterial Beach BNd. - Newland St. 0.48 A 17,000 4-lane secondary arterial I' Newland St. - Magnolia St. 0.45 A 16.000 4-lane secondary arterial I Maanolia St. - Bushard St. 0.59 A 21,000 4-lane secondary arterial IIBushard St. - Brookhurst St. 0.76 C 27,000 4-lane secondary arterial i Brookhurst St. - Ward St. 0.39 A 14,000 4-lane secondary arterial i 17th Street PCH - Orange Ave. 0.29 A 11,000 4-lane primary arterial Orange Ave. - Palm Ave. 0.56 A 21,000 4-lane primary arterial i Palm Ave. - Main St. 0.48 A 18,000 4-lane primary arterial i i Page 6 .�... AM .tea AW AMAM M M M i M A �! � MEMORANDUM August 28, 1995 Page 8 '!'able 1 1N'I'ERSECI'ION LEVEL Ole SERVICE SUMMARY FOR I'OS'1' YEAIt 2010 AL'I'I:RN�TIVES IIUII.I)-OU'l"l'O MPAII WI'1 TOUT Ml'1'IGA'l'ION Cross Gap Connector Alternative No Unfunded Roads Alternative AM Peak !lour I'M Peak Ilour AM Peak Hour I'M Peak Ilour Intersection V C Ratio LOS V C Ratio► I.OS V C Ratio LOS V C Ratio LOS Balsa Ave;./Balsa Chica St. 0.68 11 0.73 C 0.07 It 0.74 C Balsa Avc./Graham St. 0.38 A 0.55 A (I.38 A 0.49 lhika Avc./81►i ingelalt: Avc. 0.72 (' 0.77 (' 0.75 (' 0.78 l ' 1.3ol.ra Ave./C:dwards Sl, 0,1i9 !'S 0,76 C; Doha Avf~:/Galdriwcst:S( O,i�J': .... ; 1,27 Edinger Ave./Bolsa Chico St. 0.82 D 0.80 C 0.85 D 0.78 C Edinger Ave./Graham St. 0.49 A 0.53 A 0.49 A 0.52 A Edinger Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.53 A 0.75 C 0.48 A 0.75 C Edinger Ave./Edwards St. 0.44 A 0.74 C 0.43 A 0.75 C' I-dinger Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.49 A 0.83 1) 0.46 A 0.83 I) Edinger Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.73 C 0.82 1) 0.73 C 0.81 I) Warner Ave./1'Cyl' 0.>Sfi' la' b,73 (1.0)l 1: :0.74 c 'W�t't7�lr Awe (sa C1lc� loll. MEMIM .loom mvrr r.r tar Now MEMORANDUM August 28, 1995 Page 9 TABLE t (Cont.) Cross Cap Connector Alternative No Unftnuled (toads Alternative AM Peak 11o► r I'M Peak !lour AM Peak flour 1'M Peak !lour Inlersection V C Ratio LOS V C Kafiri LOS V/C; R-a iu LOS V C' Bali►+ LOS Warner Ave./Graham St. 0.52 A 0.62 B 0.57 A 0.75 C Warner Ave./Springdale Ave. 0.57 A 0.65 B 0.59 A 0.67 B Warner Ave./Edwards St. 0.61 B 0.71 C 0.59 A 0.69 B Warner Ave./Goldenwest St. 0.72 C 0.85 1) 0.72 C 0.85 D Warner Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.90 C 0.81 D 0.74 C 0.81 D Slater Ave./Edwartis St. 0.62 13 0.02 13 0.6:3 B 0.61 13 Slater Ave./Goldenwes( St. 0.73 C O.85 D O.69 B 0.95 D Slater Ave./Brach Blvd. 0.90 1) o.91► 0 O.rXI D (L91, C Talbert Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.72 C 0.82 1) 0.69 13 0.94 1) Ellk Ave./Reads Blvd.' . 0.67: 13 0,94 1:: 0.66 11 0.91i E GarGcld ,vt~;/ Ald nw � Sl. � .,. Q,a .. .. .:: ... 0.48 A 0.84 D Yorktown Ave./Goldenwest 0.61 B 0.77 C 0.62 13 0.76 C St. Adams Ave./Beach Blvd. 0.71 C 0.85 1) 0.71 C, 0.99 1) Adams Ave./Magnolia St. 0.61 B O.84 D 0.62 B 0.94 D •+�■ �� �� mmwmp W� m� r1r rl� �� Ittlll� IItH� �� 11111i iihi� MEMORANDUM August 28, 1995 Page 10 TABLE' 1 (Cont.) Cross Cup Connector Alternative No Unfunded Ronds Alternative AM Peak I lour I'M Peuk I lour AM Peak Hour I'M Peak flour Inlerseclioll V C Ratio LOS V C Ratio LOS V C Ratio L. -s LOS Adams Ave./Brookliurst St. 0.83 D 0.97 1) 0.83 D 0.97 D PCH/Goldenwest St. 0.70 13 0.70 13 0.69 It 0.70 13 PCH/Beach Blvd. 0.58 A 0.80 C 0.67 13 0.94 1) PCI I/Bro okhurst St. 0.68 13 p.66 It 0.68 11 0.66 11 I3raoklwr f SI:/� �imiltan St, pal Y� �.1U. X'. : (i 91 C� i.02 1� Level of Service was determined using the intersection operational analysis methodology, as described in Chapter 9 of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. X Scenario Comparison-Gen Plan Street From To Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Adams Brookhurst E. City Limit E (0.96) E E Beach Yorktown Garfield D (0.85) D D Bolsa Chica Rancho Bolsa E (0.99) E F Bolsa McFadden D (0.83) D D McFadden Edinger D (0.82) D Brookhurst Indianapolis Adams E (0.91) E E Adams Yorktown D 2.82 D D Yorktown Garfield E 0.92 E E Edwards McFadden Bolsa D Ellis Beach Newland D 0.84 D D Garfield Delaware Beach D (0.83) D D Beach Newland F (1.07) F F Newland Magnolia D ( D Golden West McFadden Bolsa E Gothard Warner Heil D (0.81) Heil Edinger F (1.12) E Edinger Center E (0.93) E Center McFadden F (1.35) F F Hamilton Newland Magnolia D (0.83) D Heil Graham Springdale D (0.84) D D McFadden Edwards Golden West D (0.81) D Gothard Beach D Orange 17th 6th D (0.81) D D PCH N. City Limit Warner F (1.52) F F Warner Seapoint F (1.31) F F Seapoint Golden West F (1.15) F F Huntington Beach D (0.85) D E Beach Newland \ D Newland Magnolia D (0.83) D D Magnolia Brookhurst D (0.87) D E Brookhurst E. City Limit F (1.19) F F Springdale McFadden Bolsa E (0.96) E E Bolsa N. City Limit F (1.15) F F Warner Gothard Beach D (0.82) D D Beach Newland D (0.83) D D Newland Magnolia I E (0.99) 1 E F Intersections N/S Street E/W Street AM/PM LOS Brookhurst Hamilton E/F E/F E/F Beach Ellis B/E B/E B/E Golden West Garfield A/E Bolsa Chica Warner E/E E/E F/F Golden West Bolsa D/E D/E D/F Edwards Bolsa \\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\\\\ B/E PCH Warner \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ E/C Indicates acceptable LOS in that scenario. 0014650.01 RPage 1 City of Huntington Beach Inter-department Communication DATE: October 2, 1995 TO: Jim Otterson, Traffic Engineer Linda Niles, Senior Planner FROM: Bruce Gilmer, Associate Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment; Planning Commission Request Existing and Proposed Lane Configurations The attached listing presents the existing lanes, existing Circulation Element configuration, and proposed Circulation Element configuration for all arterial street segments. Those listed would experience changes because: • New lanes are painted on a fully widened street (Springdale, S/o Slater) • Street is widened and new lanes added (Newland, S/o Hamilton) • Street capacity is insufficient for predicted traffic demand (Adams, E/o Brookhurst) • Existing lane configuration will match new designation (Main, N/o Delaware) These road segments are the ones which will be affected by the proposed Circulation Element where a different number of lanes or classification are shown. Otherwise the street modifications will not change the existing classification of the road segment. 0014793.01 03/25/96 8:23 AM Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT No. of No. of SEG EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES Lanes Classification Lanes Classification 197 17TH MAIN PALM 2 4 PRIMARY 198 17TH PALM ORANGE 2 4 PRIMARY 199 17TH ORANGE PCH 2 4 PRIMARY 75 ADAMS 17th MAIN ST. 2 LOCAL 76 ADAMS MAIN ST. LAKE 2 LOCAL 77 ' ADAMS LAKE i DELAWARE 78 ADAMS ! DELAWARE BEACH , 79 ADAMS BEACH NEW LAND 80 ADAMS NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 81 ADAMS I MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 82 ADAMS BUSHARD BROOKHURST 83 ADAMS BROOKHURST S. A. RIVER 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 101 ALGONQUIN HEIL WARNER 2 4 I SECONDARY 1 89 ATLANTA LAKE DELAWARE 2 4 PRIMARY 90 ATLANTA DELAWARE BEACH 1 2 4 PRIMARY 91 ATLANTA BEACH NEW LAND 1 92 ATLANTA NEW LAND j MAGNOLIA 93 ATLANTA ' MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 94 ATLANTA j BUSHARD BROOKHURST 2041 ATLANTA ! 1ST DELAWARE 2 4 PRIMARY 98 I BANNING I MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 2 4 I SECONDARY 2 COLLECTOR 99 BANNING BUSHARD BROOKHURST 2 4 j SECONDARY 2 COLLECTOR 11 BOLSA I BOLSA CHICA GRAHAM 21 BOLSA GRAHAM SPRINGDALE 3 . BOLSA SPRINGDALE EDWARDS 41 BOLSA EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST 102 1 BOLSA CHICA N CITY LIMIT 1 BOLSA j 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 1037 BOLSA CHICA BOLSA ' ARGOSY 1 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 104 BOLSA CHICA ARGOSY McFADDEN 6 6 1 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 105 BOLSA CHICA McFADDEN EDINGER 6 6 I MAJOR 8 MAJOR 106 I BOLSA CHICA ! EDINGER i HEIL 1 107 BOLSA CHICA ; HEIL i WARNER 1 177 ! BROOKHURST : GARFIELD YORKTOWN 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 178 BROOKHURST YORKTOWN 1 ADAMS 6 6 MAJOR 8 1 MAJOR 179 BROOKHURST : ADAMS INDIANAPOLIS 6 6 MAJOR 8 1 MAJOR 180 BROOKHURST ! INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA 1 181 BROOKHURST ATLANTA j HAMILTON 1 182 1 BROOKHURST HAMILTON BANNING 1 183 BROOKHURST BANNING BUSHARD I 184 BROOKHURST - BUSHARD PCH 1 170 BUSHARD GARFIELD YORKTOWN 171 BUSHARD YORKTOWN ADAMS 1 172 BUSHARD ADAMS ! INDIANAPOLIS Page 1 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT No.of No. of SEG EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES Lanes Classification Lanes Classification 173 BUSHARD INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA 174 BUSHARD ATLANTA HAMILTON 175 BUSHARD HAMILTON BANNING 176 BUSHARD BANNING BROOKHURST 11 CENTER GOTHARD RAILROAD 1 12 CENTER j RAILROAD BEACH 186 DELAWARE ! GARFIELD ! YORKTOWN ! 2 4 SECONDARY 187 DELAWARE I YORKTOWN I ADAMS j 2 4 SECONDARY 188 DELAWARE ADAMS I INDIANAPOLIS 2 4 SECONDARY 189 DELAWARE INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA j 2 j 4 ISECONDARY 13T EDINGER 1 W CITY LIMIT SAYBROOK j 2 4 PRIMARY 141 EDINGER SAYBROOK BOLSA CHICA 15 I EDINGER BOLSA CHICA GRAHAM 16 EDINGER GRAHAM SPRINGDALE j 17 EDINGER SPRINGDALE ! EDWARDS 181 EDINGER EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST j 19 I EDINGER GOLDEN WEST G. W. COLLEGE 20 EDINGER 1 G. W. COLLEGE GOTHARD I 21 EDINGER GOTHARDS I WARDS 22 j EDINGER WARDS SHER I 237 EDINGER SHER I PARKSIDE j 241 EDINGER PARKSID= BEACH 251 EDINGER BEACH NEW LAND 122 EDWARDS N CITY LIMIT BOLSA 1231 EDWARDS BOLSA McFADDEN j 1241 EDWARDS McFADDEN EDINGER 1251 EDWARDS I EDINGER I HEIL 126 j EDWARDS HEIL WARNER 127 ! EDWARDS WARNER SLATER 1281 EDWARDS SLATER ELLIS 1 2 4 ISECONDARY1 129 ! EDWARDS ELLIS I GARFIELD 55 I ELLIS EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST 1 2 4 SECONDARY 56 ELLIS GOLDEN WEST GOTHARD j 57 1 ELLIS j GOTHARD MAIN ST. 1 2 4 SECONDARY 58 1 ELLIS BEACH I NEW LAND 59 GARFIELD EDWARDS 1 GOLDEN WEST 1 60 GARFIELD GOLDEN WEST I MAIN ST. 1 4 6 j MAJOR 61 GARFIELD MAIN ST. BEACH 4 4 PRIMARY 6 ! MAJOR 62 GARFIELD BEACH I NEW LAND 4 4 PRIMARY 6 1 MAJOR 63 GARFIELD NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 64 GARFIELD MAGNOLIA j BUSHARD 65 j GARFIELD BUSHARD 1 BROOKHURST 66 GARFIELD BROOKHURST WARD ! 2 4 I PRIMARY I 1 Page 2 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT No.of No. of SEG EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES Lanes Classification Lanes Classification 130 GOLDEN WEST BOLSA McFADDEN 131 GOLDEN WEST McFADDEN EDINGER 132 GOLDEN WEST j EDINGER HEIL 133 GOLDEN WEST HEIL NORMAILYDIA 134 GOLDEN WEST NORMA/LYDIA j WARNER 135 GOLDEN WEST WARNER j SLATER 5 6 MAJOR 136 GOLDEN WEST SLATER TALBERT 137 GOLDEN WEST TALBERT ELLIS I 138 ! GOLDEN WEST j ELLIS GARFIELD 4 6 MAJOR 139 j GOLDEN WEST j GARFIELD YORKTOWN 4 6 MAJOR j 140 GOLDEN WEST YORKTOWN PALM j 141 GOLDEN WEST j PALM PCH j 142 GOTHARD McFADDEN ; CENTER 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 143 GOTHARD CENTER EDINGER 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 144 GOTHARD EDINGER HEIL 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 145 GOTHARD HEIL i WARNER j 4 4 SECONDARY 4 PRIMARY 146 GOTHARD WARNER I SLATER j 147 GOTHARD SLATER j TALBERT j 148 GOTHARD TALBERT j ELLIS 2 4 SECONDARY 148 GOTHARD ELLIS MAIN ST. j 108 j GRAHAM j BOLSA McFADDEN 1091. GRAHAM McFADDEN ' EDINGER 110 j GRAHAM i EDINGER j HEIL 1 2 4 ISECONDARY 111 GRAHAM ' HEIL WARNER 1 2 4 ISECONDARY 112 GRAHAM j WARNER SLATER j 2 4 ISECONDARY . 95 HAMILTON NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 2 4 j PRIMARY 96 HAMILTON MAGNOLIA BUSHARD ! , 97 j HAMILTON j BUSHARD j BROOKHURST j 26 HEIL SAYBROOK ' ALGONQUIN 27 j HEIL j ALGONQUIN j BOLSA CHICA j 2 4 j SECONDARY j 28 HEIL j BOLSA CHICA ! GRAHAM I j 29 HEIL GRAHAM SPRINGDALE 30 HEIL SPRINGDALE I EDWARDS j 1 31 HEIL EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST 32 HEIL ! GOLDEN WEST ! GOTHARD j 33 HEIL GOTHARD BEACH I 2 4 SECONDARY 34 j HEIL j BEACH j NEW LAND j 2 4 SECONDARY 84 1 INDIANAPOLIS ' LAKE BEACH 2 4 SECONDARY 85 INDIANAPOLIS j BEACH NEWLAND 2 4 SECONDARY 86 j INDIANAPOLIS NEW LAND MAGNOLIA 87 1 INDIANAPOLIS MAGNOLIA BUSHARD 1 j 88 1 INDIANAPOLIS BUSHARD j BROOKHURST j I 195 j LAKE YORKTOWN ADAMS 2 4 SECONDARY Page 3 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT No.of No. of SEG EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES Lanes Classification Lanes Classification 162 MAGNOLIA 405 FWY WARNER 163 MAGNOLIA GARFIELD YORKTOWN 164 MAGNOLIA YORKTOWN I ADAMS 165 MAGNOLIA ADAMS j INDIANAPOLIS 166 j MAGNOLIA INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA 167 MAGNOLIA ATLANTA j HAMILTON 168 MAGNOLIA HAMILTON BANNING 169 MAGNOLIA BANNING PCH 190 MAIN ELLIS GARFIELD I 6,4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 191 MAIN j GARFIELD YORKTOWN 192 MAIN YORKTOWN j 17th 193 MAIN 17th ADAMS i 5 McFADDEN BOLSA CHICA j GRAHAM 6 McFADDEN GRAHAM j SPRINGDALE 7 McFADDEN SPRINGDALE EDWARDS j 8 McFADDEN EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST j 4 4 SECONDARY 4 PRIMARY 9 j McFADDEN GOLDEN WEST j GOTHARD 10 McFADDEN GOTHARD BEACH 2 4 SECONDARY 150 NEWLAND EDINGER HEIL 2 4 ! SECONDARY 151 NEWLAND HEIL WARNER I j 152 NEWLAND j WARNER j SLATER 1 3 j 4 ISECONDARY1 1531 NEWLAND SLATER TALBERT j 154 j NEWLAND I TALBERT ELLIS j 1551 NEWLAND ELLIS GARFIELD j 156 j NEWLAND GARFIELD YORKTOWN 1571 NEWLAND I YORKTOWN I ADAMS 158 NEWLAND ADAMS INDIANAPOLIS i 2 4 ISECONDARY j 159 NEWLAND INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA j 160 NEWLAND ATLANTA HAMILTON 2 4 j SECONDARY 161 NEWLAND HAMILTON PCH 2 4 SECONDARY 2017 ORANGE GOLDEN WEST i 17TH 1 2 4 j SECONDARY j 2 COLLECTOR 2021 ORANGE I 17TH 6TH 1 2 4 SECONDARY1 2 COLLECTOR 2031 ORANGE I 6TH 1ST 1 2 1 4 j SECONDARY j 2 COLLECTOR 1967 PALM SEA.PO-INT GOLDEN WEST j 2001 PALM GOLDEN WEST 17th 1 2 1 4 j SECONDARY 2 COLLECTOR 194 j PARKSIDE ALDRICH EDINGER j 100 SA BROOK j EDINGER HEIL j 2 j 4 ISECONDARY j 205 SEAPOINT GARFIELD I PALM 2061 SEAPOINT ! PALM PCH 46 SLATER i GRAHAM SPRINGDALE I 2 4 I SECONDARY 47 SLATER 1 SPRINGDALE I EDWARDS j 48 SLATER j EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST j 4-9-T SLATER GOLDEN WEST : GOTHARD I Page 4 Alpha Listing EXISTING PROPOSED CIRCULATION CIRCULATION ELEMENT ELEMENT No.of No. of SEG EXISTING Thru Thru NO STREET NAME FROM TO LANES Lanes Classification Lanes Classification 50 SLATER ! GOTHARD BEACH 51 SLATER j BEACH NEW LAND 113 SPRINGDALE N CITY LIMIT SKYLAB 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 114 SPRINGDALE SKYLAB I BOLSA 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 115 SPRINGDALE I BOLSA McFADDEN 4 4 PRIMARY 6 MAJOR 116 SPRINGDALE I McFADDEN MARINA HIGH 117 SPRINGDALE j MARINA HIGH EDINGER 118 SPRINGDALE EDINGER 1 HEIL 119 SPRINGDALE HEIL WARNER 120 SPRINGDALE WARNER I SLATER 121 SPRINGDALE I SLATER ; TALBERT 2 4 PRIMARY 52 TALBERT j GOLDEN WEST j GOTHARD 1 53 TALBERT GOTHARD BEACH 2 4 PRIMARY 54 TALBERT ! BEACH NEW LAND I 185 WARD GARFIELD YORKTOWN 2 4 SECONDARY 35 WARNER PCH I ALGONQUIN 4 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 36 WARNER ; ALGONQUIN j BOLSA CHICA 37 WARNER BOLSA CHICA I GRAHAM 38 WARNER I GRAHAM SPRINGDALE i 39 WARNER I SPRINGDALE EDWARDS 40 WARNER EDWARDS GOLDEN WEST 41 WARNER :. GOLDEN WEST GOTHARD 42 WARNER j GOTHARD NICHOLS j 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 43 WARNER NICHOLS j BEACH 6 6 I MAJOR 8 MAJOR 44 WARNER I BEACH NEW LAND 6 6 MAJOR 8 MAJOR 45 WARNER NEW LAND j MAGNOLIA 6 6 i MAJOR 8 MAJOR 67 YORKTOWN I GOLDEN WEST MAIN ST. 1 4 4 ISECONDARY1 4 1 PRIMARY 68 YORKTOWN MAIN ST. j DELAWARE 69 YORKTOWN I DELAWARE j BEACH 70 YORKTOWN j BEACH NEW LAND 1 717 YORKTOWN NEW LAND MAGNOLIA I 72 YORKTOWN MAGNOLIA BUSHARD i I 73 YORKTOWN BUSHARD BROOKHURST ! I 74 j YORKTOWN BROOKHURST WARD Page 5 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2 0 0 0 Main Street P . O . 8 o x 1 9 0 Calif o r n i a 9 2 6 4 8 Les M. Jones II Public Works Department Director (714) 536-5431 December 12, 1995 Mr. John F. Scott 22032 Capistrano Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Subject: Letter to Steve Holden dated 11/27/95 Response to Concerns Dear Mr. Scott: We have received a copy of your letter to Planning Commissioner Holden of November 27, 1995, regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the General Plan Amendment. This response is provided to clarify the few substantive issues contained in your letter. The responses to items 1-8, 1-9 and 1-10 (13-176,177) discuss fully the validation and parameters of modeling efforts for the traffic model used in this General Plan process. Your comments regarding National Cooperative Highway Research Project (NCHRP) Report No. 255 parameters are also addressed in those responses. Staff efforts to provide information and explanation for your use have been extensive. You have been provided with all of the traffic count information you have requested (a complete copy of the city's traffic count database), yet you accuse city staff of hiding information. This assertion is simply not true. Traffic count data demonstrates that there are wide fluctuations in vehicular traffic at specific locations in the city. Still, you avoid mentioning that fact, or the obvious conclusions to be drawn from it, i.e., that no single value in the model can be expected to replicate a "snap shot"traffic count taken on the street. I will take this opportunity to correct errors in the information you submitted in your letter dated September 4, 1995. In reviewing the data, I limited the analysis to the screenlines which affect the Huntington Beach area, and for which traffic count data could be used in place of values on the OCEMA flow map. The following corrections are submitted for your information and review: po. 13-163 "Correlation Between Modeled and Measured Traffic Counts" In performing this analysis, you did not perform a fundamental step, i.e., disaggregating (separating) the different facility types (freeway, major and minor arterials). Consequently, your calculated results are not valid. When the data is correctly analyzed (via disaggregation), the value of r exceeds 0.99 for Screenlines 1, 2, 3, and 8, and exceeds 0.90 for Screenlines 4 and 7. All exceed the recommended minimum of r= 0.88. Please see the attached Data Summary sheet and screenline location map. pg. 13-169 "Comparison of Model vs Measured Mean" This calculation is not appropriate for measuring the validity of a multiple element data set. It is properly used to measure the accuracy of several measurements against one predicted value. The claim of bias in the model is not supported by use of this calculation. I would also point out the t value at the 95% confidence level is 1.960, not 1.645 as shown as "the z value, from statistical tables" in your 9/4/95 letter. The t values quoted are contained in Table A-3, page 199 of the Manual of Traffic Engineering Studies, 4th Edition, Box & Oppenlanden. I have attached a copy of this page for your reference. The correct use of Table A-3 would be to use the degrees of freedom value for the number of actual counts taken at one specific location for comparison to the predicted model value at that location. pg. 13-173 "Confidence Interval for Measured vs. Model Data" The Confidence Interval was reviewed using surface street data (freeways were not included). The results are shown on the attached sheet titled "Data Summary" and indicate that the surface street model predictions fall well within the limits of the calculated interval. Therefore, no bias or skewing of data elements is demonstrated. pg. 13-174 "Comparison of Model vs. Measured Data Variance"As noted above, the streets were not separated by category (disaggregated) and therefore any calculations of variance which lumps all of the data together without regard to the classification of the street is invalid. Further, I would point out the recommended variance that is acceptable for each type of facility differs according to the ability of the model to predict those values. For example, an acceptable variance of seven percent (7%) for Freeways is less that the ten percent (10%) designated for Principal Arterials. This is consistent with the ability of the model to assign traffic to major flow arterial streets more accurately than to low volume roads. The attached Data Summary sheet shows the variance for each type of facility across each screenline examined. Thirteen of the fifteen values are well within the "Suggested Deviation" values of CALTRANS. In an effort to demonstrate that the model data represents a valid picture of existing conditions as defined in NCHRP 255, 1 replaced all of the "count" values (taken from OCEMA's 1990/91 Flow Map) with the actual count data taken in 1988 and 1989. When that is done, the variance for Screenline No. 2 is 2.89%, compared to the - 0.9% shown on page 13-178 of the responses. The value of 2.89 % is still significantly less than the allowed 10% as specified in NCHRP 255, and indicates that the model is performing well within accepted parameters. The fourth paragraph on page 2 of your letter poses an interesting question: Why wasn't data acquired in 1993 used in a 1991 modeling validation effort? I believe that the answer is obvious; the data collected in 1993 did not exist in 1991. 1 believe the efforts of city staff to respond to your inquiries and concerns have been complete and thorough. I consider this matter closed. Sincerely, ames D. Otterson, P.E., P.L.S. Traffic Engineer JDO/BHG/bg cc: Members of the Planning Commission Linda Niles, Senior Planner Bruce Gilmer, Associate Traffic Engineer Carlton Waters, P.E., Robert Kahn, John Kain &Associates Doug Smith, P.E., DKS Associates Attachments: Data Summary Screenline Map Table A-3, pg. 199, Manual of Traffic Engineering Studies, 4th Edition DATA SUMMARY SARA Model Validation Data Analysis Fre ay Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Screenline Suggested Suggested Suggested No. % Deviation Deviation % Deviation Deviation % Deviation Deviation R Value 1 -2.38298 7.00000 7.64352 10.00000 -6.39900 15.00000 0.997135 2 6.97095 7.00000 0.92550 10.00000 -2.59336 15.00000 0.995539 3 5.93525 7.00000 -1.16071 10.000001 NONE 0.999961 4 NONE 1 9.904531 10.00000 -10.252371 15.00000 0.933743 5 Not in Huntington Beach Area 5a Not in Huntington Beach Area 6 Not in Huntington Beach Area 7 NONE 1 5.501131 10.00000 '€fr$ 15.00000 0.907395 8 x:.=a'7.542•d 7.000001 0.936391 10.000 01 6.000001 15.00000 0.998229 9 Not in Huntington Beach Area 10 Not in Huntington Beach Area 11 Not in Huntington Beach Area Overall Correlation r= 0.99348286 r= 0.99348286 r^2 = 0.98700818 Mean of Counts<200k 23.4333333 Confidence Range (95%) 2.82321926 Confidence Interval 20.6101141 < µ< 26.2565526 Mean of Predictions<200k 1 24.25151521 J Page 1 0015954.01 LOCA I IUNZ - '' \} a Cp..... f: _ r ... . ...... 4 .17s..... .... .`� O v= 10 1 o 1 0 f 1 LEGEND: Q2 SCREENUNE MULISER j \ _L I SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSINGS ors COOPERATIVE STUDY I Orange County, California EXHIBIT P Robart Kahn, John Kmin __ emu.•" ? a i Table A-3 as 41.6 < w < 43.0. That is, the population s Table of t Values mean of the spot speeds is expected to ! Degrees of Level of a be contained in the interval from 41.6 to Freedom 0.10 0.05 D.01 43.0 mph with a confidence that is equal ` 1 6.314 12.706 63.657 to 95 percent 2 2.920 4.303 9.925 This interval is the measure of pre- _ 3 2.353 3.162 5.641 cision of the sample, assuming that the 4 2.132 2.776 4.604 selection is random and unbiased. If the 5 2.015 2.571 4.032 sample error is too large, then more ob- servations should be obtained, making 6 1.943 2.447 3.707 certain, of course, that conditions have not changed since the original observa- 7 1.895 2.365 3.499 9 8 1.860 2.306 3.355 lions were made. f 9 1.833 2.262 3.250 When a study is made in which the 3 10 1.812 2.228 3.1E9 result is expressed as a proportion or a percentage, the precision of the estimate 11 1.796 2.201 3.106 is indicated by the following inequality: s 12 1.782 2.179 3.055 P - L < p < P Pq Pq e 13 1.771 2.160 3.012 N = t• N (A-i) 14 1.761 2.145 2.977 V ►� 15 1.753 2.131 2.947 where P = proportion of the population p = proporion of the sample 6 2.120 2.921 q = 1.0 - p i 6 1.74 17 1.7402.110 2.698 t.= statistic of the t distribution 18 1.734 2.101 2.878 for (n' - 1) degrees of 19 1.729 2.093 2.851 freedom and the probability 20 1.725 2.066 2.645 refined dy the subscript c 1� N = rurnber of observations _ 21 1.721 2.060 2.831 •=1.0 - confidence coefficient 22 1.717 2.074 2.619 The term ( I PN ) is defined as the stand- ` 23 1.714 2.069 2.807 VV 24 1.711 2.064 2.797 and error of he es:i-gate for the propor- 1� 25 1.708 2.060 2.787 lion. Typical values of the t statistic are • obtained from Tabie A-3 for the various 26 1.706 2.056 2.779 degrees of 'reedom and for selected 27 1.703 2.052 2.771 levels of a. 7he determination of the 28 1.701 2.048 2.7E3 sample precision for proportions or per- 29 1.699 2.045 2.756 centages is very sirni!ar in procedure and 30 1.697 2.042 2.750 interpretation to the previously discussed �A • situation for the mean of a sample. 40 1.684 2.021 2.704 As an exa-,;)'.e of a percentage esti- 60 1.671 2.000 2.650 mate, 400 drivers were randomly sampled !• I 120 1.658 1.980 2.617 in regard to their location of employment, x 1.645 1.960 2.576 and 120 or 30 _ercent reposed that they worked in the dov: ttown area. The term Table A-3. Typical values of the t s;atis.ic are ` pq 1�s caicu!atEd as 1 060 30 • 70 presented in this table for various decrees of t. N) ` 400 freedom and for selected levels of corn'-oence. Such a ,able is useful in studying and es,,r•ai- or 4.5 percent a5 .he precision of the ng degrees of error in cenain trig en;,neer- ing studies. percentage est matE 1Gr a confidence co log John F. Scott 22032 Capistrano Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8309 Telephone(714)962-1746 Fax(714)962J416 November 27, 1995 NOV 2 $ '995 RECEIVED Mr. Steve Holden TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Planning Commissioner DEC - 111995 City of Huntington Beach 200 Main Street ;it)NTINGTON BEACH, CA Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Holden: Staff was not responsive to the concerns we expressed regarding the DEIR for the General Plan Update. A fact we will show in this letter. The larger issue, larger than the modeling process shortcomings we have pointed out in our comments, is the competency of our City Government. Staffs comments demonstrate that they do not understand the issues that we raised regarding problems with the modeling process. This is hardly surprising, as they are the source of the problems about which we have written in our DEIR comments. It is the responsibility of the appointed and elected leaders, your responsibility, to ensure that government is fulfilling its functions competently. In the present case that means that it is your responsibility to thoroughly review the issues, even though they involve modeling, statistics, and other technical matters. Failure to do so is an abrogation of your responsibility -- much as the County's leaders failed in their responsibility to monitor Mr. Citron. Our DEIR comments are based upon the modeling maxim of"garbage in; garbage out". This means simply that if the input data is not good, the results can't be good either. This is a matter of common sense. No matter how good the modeling software. no matter how diligently one tries, no matter how many credentials the practioner has, the results are no better than the inputs. As we have shown in our comments to the DEIR the inputs to the model are unreliable. Staffs response to our DEIR comments was NON RESPONSIVE. In the second paragraph of our comments we state, in essence, our concern with the quality of the input data. We further state that the poor quality of the input data raises questions (CEQA 15148 and l 5151) about the DEIR. As we noted in this paragraph the details were provided in subsequent paragraphs. In Staffs response to, labels I3, 111, 112, 113, 114, I15 and 116, we find the phrase "The comment does not pertain to the content of the DEIR; therefore, no substantive response is required". Clearly, to anyone bothering to read our second paragraph, this is just not true. Staff has chosen to duck the issues rather than respond quantitatively as demanded by CEQA. This is obviously non responsive. "The principle of science, the definition, almost is the following: <The test of all knowledge is experiment (put in italics and remove the symbols "<[]>")>. Experiment is the sole judge of scientific 'truth'." This quote is from Nobel Laureate, Richard Feynman in his work "Lectures on Physics". Engineering also follows the principles of science about which Mr. Feynman speaks. After two years of effort, we are unable to find the source of the measured (i.e. experimental) data that is used to verify the traffic model The source of the column labeled "COUNTED ADT VOLUME" of the data on page 13-178 of Staffs response to DEIR comments couldn't be less clear. Let us focus on a single table entry, which is Edinger Ave. at screenline 2. According to the table on 13-178 the "COUNTED ADT VOLUME" is 31,000. But, according to traffic count data provided by the City Staff, the measured data for Edinger at that location is 22,568 as shown on page 13-155. Which is it? Both numbers can't be correct. According to Feynman, measured data takes precedence. The essence of our concern is that Staff prefers the other number -- the one which is not measured. The issue couldn't be more clear. Either Staff has data which they've not shared with City Residents or, Staff prefers to use values, concocted in some way known only to them, in preference to measured data. V1'e believe that you should ask Staff if they can provide you with the source of measured data for each and every value of the "COUNTED ADT VOLUME" on page 13-155. If they do not have measured data for this column, then you must ask for the source of the data and on what basis they have chosen such data over actual measured data. We must point out another disingenuous response by Staff to our concerns. In the response to one of our comments, labeled I8, on page 13-176, Staff asserts that the model is validated to NCHRP-255. When we look at page 41 of the NCHRP-255 (page 13-171 in the DEIR response), we see a test for comparing simulated (i.e. modeled) data to actual base year traffic data. We did this and find a correlation far outside of that specified by the standard. Rather than address the issue --the model does not represent measured data in any acceptable way for the base year— Staff waves their arms and hides behind assertions of"suggested" and "desirable". It seems to us that if it is desirable and cheap to do such a test, it should be done. If, when done, disagreements between the model and base year traffic count data are substantial, then corrective measures must be undertaken. Let us look at the response, labeled D, to our comment on page 13-147. This is a question which goes right to the heart of the matter. According to the data provided by Staff, traffic volumes in the City rose 50.78% IN ONE YEAR. Then in the next 8 years they rose only 1.84%. This is a very clear indication that something is wrong with the measured data. The data just doesn't ring true. Staffs response is that we didn't use this prior data, and therefore this is not a substantive comment. As the last year in that string was 1993, we assume some of the 1993 data was input into the model. If our assumption is not correct,just what data was used? If our assumption is correct, then such data is suspect because it is pan of a clearly suspicious string of data. This demands a response other than it is not relevant. We have raised very serious questions that Mr. Otterson needs to answer. You would be derelict in you duties as a Planning Commissioner if you signed off on the Draft General Plan without substantive responses to these questions. We don't see how anyone looking at the problems with the input data can seriously argue that the results of the traffic model presented in the DEIR can be accurate. This is the issue of the competency of government we've raised. It is your duty to get to the bottom of this, and to ensure that reliable input data is used for the traffic studies used in the DEIR. In the meantime, you should not accept this DEIR because it doesn't meet the standards of CEQA 15151 and 15148 as we stated in our original comments. Respectfully, Michael Mott John F. Scott cc: Tom Harmon Trip Generation Changes- GPA Chart 4 GPAC vs Planning Comm. Trip Generation 35,000 30,000 25,000 - 1020,000 - - --- — -- 01 C Y a a •c .S15.000 - 10,000 - - — - - - 5,000 - - -- -- - — — ---- - L Lt's 0 w-M L I on i rni c°9i °e�i c°9i rO1i m r°i v v `aIDIn TAZ No. ■GPAC TOTAL ®PC TOTAL Page 1 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS_ TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 34 337 204 204 277 17.75 25 1 443 277 _ 3,809 _2,382 (1,42.7)_ 33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 165 165 1,419 1,419 0_ 33 352 827 827 2.76 0.35 0.35 42.07896 42 2,103 2,103 0 51 363 204 817 1.03 15_ 0.35 15_ 16 _ 129 549 420 83 374 827 827 4.14 0.5 0.5 90.1692 _90 4.508 4,508 _ 0 35 375 204 202 297 23.6 25 1 590 297 5,074 2,910 (2,164) 35 375 811 811 6 1.5 1.5 392.04 392 16,073 16,073 0 36 378 204 202 213 19.8 25 1 495 213 4,257 2,087 (2,170) 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 0 36 379 204 202 51 3.6 25 1 90 51 774 499 36 379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6,860 6,860 0 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 _ 3,268 2,146_ (1,122) 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 17,681 17,681 0 86 381 825 110 3.264 0.35 0.5 49.762944 71 _ 3,483 924 (2_,5_59) 24 385 204 200 _ 5.47 15 7 82 38 705 456 (249) 40 387 204 817 2.77 15 0.35 41 _ 42 _ 352 1,478 ___1_,126_ 41 387 204 817 _ _ 2.2 30 0.35 _66 34 567 1,173_ 606 41 390 204 817 4 30 0.35 120 61 1,032 2,134 1,102 37 391 204 202 66 4.62 25 1 115 66 989 646 (343) 37 391 825 825 1.98 1.5 1.5 129.3732 129 9,056 9,056 0 41 391 204 817 7 30 0.35 210 107 1,806 3,735 1,929 41 392 204 817 7.7 30 0.35 231 117 _ 1,986 4,108 2,122 75 398 811 931 1.22 0.35 1 18.60012 53 762 0 (762) 19 404 204 200 73.37 15 7 1100 513 9,460 6,156 (3,304) 78 415 200 931 2.86 6.5 1 18 125 216 1 (215) 82 426 200 200 48 6.5 4 312 192 3,744 2,304 (1,440) 81 435 200 200 160 6.5 3 1040 480 12,480 5,760 (6,720) 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 168 168 1,444 1,444 0 16 441 811 811 2.4 1 1 104.544 105 4,286 4,286 _ 0 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 0.5 1 71.08992 106 4,976 3,695 (1,281) 72 441 825 202 49 1.632 0.5 1 24.5 49 1,715 480 (12235) 89 444 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 23 447 204 204 82.5 11 11 907 907 7,800 7,800 0 23 447 811 811 0 0.35 0.35 0 0 0 1 0 0 Sorted on TAZ & PC LUC Page 1 0017842.01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS_ TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 23 448 204 204 76.23 11 _ 11 838 838 7,206 _ 7,206 _ 0 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 _ 0.35 -_ 76.23 _ 76 _ 10_,291 _ 10,291 0 70 457 204 110 _ 4.1 15 0.5 J 61 _ 89 524 1,160 636 43 458 204 202 , 7 25 15 175 - 105 1,505 11029 (476) 44 458 204 202 _ 7.1 30 _ _ 15 213 106 1,831 1,038 (793) 88 458 204 _ 825 _ ___ 1.92 30 0.35 57 29 490 2,049 1,559 46 460 204 202 7.64 30 15 229 114 1,969 1,117 __(_8.52 47 460 204 202 0.01 30 15 0 0 0 0 0 48 460 204 202 1.97 30 15 59 _ 29 _ 507 _ 284 (223) 49 460 204 202 1.13 30 15 33 16 283 _1_56 (127) 64 463 822 204 2.01 0.35 25 _ 30.64446 50 4_,137 430 _ (3,707) 58 468 204 825 1.46 25 0.35 36 22 309 1,558 1,249 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 14 14 120 120 _ 0 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 0.35 5 3 43 _ 117 74 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 _ 113 67 971 656 (3_15) 95 473 817 200 6.95 0.35 7 105.9597 48 3,708 _ 576 (3,132) 95 473 200 200 6.95 _ 6.5 7 45 48 540 576 _ 36 87 475 204 825 12.57 30 0.35 377 192 3,242 13,414 __ 10,172 55 480 204 200 30.61 15 7 459 214 3,947 2,568 (1,379) 56 480 204 825 0.55 15 0.35 8 8 68 586 _ 518 6 487 817 817 0.61 0.35 0.35 9.30006 9 325 325 0 52 489 822 200 1.03 0.35 7 15.70338 7 2,119 84 (2,035) 53 494 200 931 10.41 6.5 1 67 453 _ 804 57 495 204 202 7.31 30 15 219 _ 109 _ 1,883 _ 1,0_6_8 (8_15) 90 495 817 931 20.8 0.5 1 453.024 906 15,855_ 9 (15,846) 90 495 204 931 41.8 25 1 1045 1,821 8,987 18 (8,969) 93 495 110 931 16.37 0.5 1 356.5386 713 4,635 7 (4,628) 53 498 200 931 56.28 6.5 1 365 2,4_52 4,380 24 _ (4,356) 2 499 204 200 2.587 30 7 77 18 662 216 _(446) 50 499 822 202 2.71 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5,577 392 (5,185) 78 511 200 931 ,-_ 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 1 (323) 78 514 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187_ 324 _ 1 __(_32_3) 82 520 200 931 16 6.5 1 104 697 1,248 _ _6__ (1,242) NET TRIPS (59,737) Sorted on TAZ& PC LUC Page 2 0017842.01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS _ TRIPS CHANGE 2 499 204 200 2.587 30 7 77 18 662 _216 (446) 6 487 817 817 0.61 0.35 0.35 9.30006 9 _ 325 325 0- 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 168 168 1,444 1.444 0 16 441 811 811 2.4 1 1 104.544 105 4,286 4,286 0 19 404 204 200 73.37 15 7 1100 513 9.460 6,156 (3,304) 23 447 204 204 82.5 11 11 907 907 7,800 7,800 0 23 447 811 811 0 _ 0.35 0.35 _ 0 0 _0 _ 0 0 23 448 204 204 76.23 11 11 _ 838 838 7,206 7,206 0 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 0.35 76.23 76 10,291 10,291 0 24 385 204 200 5.47 15 7 82 38 705 456 _ (249) 33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 165 165 1.419 1,419 0 33 352 827 827 2.76 0.35 0.35 42.07896 42 _ 2,103 2,103_ 0 34 337 204 204 277 17.75 _ 25 1 443 2_77_ 3,809_ 2,382 _ _ (1,427) 35 375 204 202 297 23.6 25 1 590 297 5,074 2,910 (2,164) 35 375 811 811 6 1.5 1.5 3 22.04 392 -16-,-0-7--- 16,073 0 36 378 204 202 213 19.8 25 1 495 213 4,257 2,087 (2,170) 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 0 36 379 204 202 51 3.6 25 1 90 _ 51 774 499 (275) 36 379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6,860 6,860 0 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 3,268 2,146 (1,122) 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 17,681 17,681 0 37 391 204 202 66 4.62 25 1 115 66 989 646 (343) 37 391 825 825 1.98 1.5 1.5 129.3732 129 9,056 9,056 0 40 387 204 817 2.77 15 _0.35 41 42 352 1.478 1,126 41 387 204 817 2.2 30 0.35 66 34 567 1,173 606 41 390 204 817 4 30 0.35 120 61 1,032 2,134 1,102 41 391 204 817 7 30 0.35 210 107 1,806 3,735 1,929 41 392 204 817 _ 7.7 30 0.35 _ 231 _ 117 _ 1,986 4.108 _ 2_,122 43 458 204 202 7 25 15 _175 _ 105 _ 1,505 1,029__ _ (4_76) 44 458 204 202 7.1 30 15 _ 213 _ 106 _ 1,8_31 1.038_ _ (793) 46 460 204 202 7.64 30 15 229 114 _ 1_,969 1,117 (852) 47 460 204 202 0.01 30 15 0 0 0 0 0 48 460 204 202 - 1_97 _ _ 30 -- - -- 15 ---_-- 59 - 29- - -- 507 284 (223) - 49 460 204 202 1.13 30 15 33 16 283 156 (127) 50 499 822 202 2.71 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5,577 392 5,185) Sorted on Item No &TAZ Page 3 0017842 01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR or PC FAR or GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA DU/AC DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 51 363 204 817 1.03 _ 15 0.35 15 16 129 549 420 52 489 822 200 1.03 0.35 7 15.70338 7 2,119 84 (2,035) 53 494 200 931 10.41 6.5 1 _67 453 _ 804_ 4 53 498 200 931 56.28 6.5 _ 1 365 2,452 __ 4,380_ 24 _ (4,356) 55 480 204 200 30.61 15 7 4_5_9_ 214 _ 3,9_47_ 2,568 _ _(1_ ,379) 56 480 204 825 _ 0.55 15 0.35 8 8 68 586 _ 518_ 57 495 204 202 7.31 30 15 219 109 1,883 1,068 (815) 58 468 204 825 1.46 25 0.35 36 22 309 1,558 1,249 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 14 14 120 120 0 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 0.35 _ 5 3 43 ___ 117_ 74 64 463 822 204 2.01 _ 0.35 25 30.64446 50_ 4,137 _ 4_30_ (3_,_707) 70 457 204 110 4.1 15 0.5 61 89 _ 52_4_ 1,160 636 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 _ 0.5 _ 1 71.0_8992 106_ 4,976 3,695_ (1,2_81) 72 441 825 202 49 1.632 0.5 1 24.5 49 1,715 _ _ 480 (1,235) 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 _ _ 113 _ 67 _ __ 971 _ 656 _ (315) 75 398 811 931 1.22 0.35 1 18.60012_ 53 _ 762_ _ 0_ (762) 78 415 200 931 2.86 6.5 1 18 125 216 _ 1 (215) 78 511 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 __ 324 _ 1 _ (323) 78 514 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 _ 324 1 _(323) 81 435 200 200 160 6.5 3 1040 480 12,480 5,760 (6,720) 82 426 200 200 48 6.5 4 312 192 3,744 2,304 (1,440) 82 520 200 931 16 6.5 1 _ 104 _ 697 1,248 6 (1,242) 83 374 827 827 4.14 0.5 0.5 90.1692 90 4,508 4,508 0_ 86 381 825 110 3.264 0.35 0.5 49.762944 71 3.483 924 (2,559) 87 475 204 825 12.57 30 0.35 _ 377 192 3.242 13,414 10,172 88 458 204 825 1.92 30 0.35 57 29 490_ 2,049 _1,559_ 89 444 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 _ (24) 90 495 817 931 20.8 0.5_ 1 _ 453.024 906_ 15,855 _ 9 _(15,846) 90 495 204 931 41.8 25 1 1045 1,821 _ 8,987 18 _ (8,969) 93 495 110 931 16.37 0.5 1 356.5386 713 4,635 7 (4,628) 95 473 817 200 6.95 0.35 7 105.9597 48 3,708 576 (3,132) -§-5-1 473 2001 200 6.95 6.51 7 45 48_ 540_ 576 36 NET TRIPS (59,737) Sorted on Item No & TAZ Page 4 0017842.01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC _ UNITS UNITS TRIPS _TRIPS CHANGE 86 381 825 110 3.264 0.35 0.5 49.762944 71 3,483 924 (2,559) 70 457 204 110 4.1 15 0.5 61 89 524 1,160 _ 636 81 435 200 200 160 6.5 3 1040 480 12,480 5,760 (6,720) 19 _ 404 204 200 73.37 15 _ 7 1100 513 9,460 6,156 (3,304) 95 473 817 200 6.95 0.35 7 105.9597 48 3,708 576 (3,132) 52 489 822 200 1.03 _ 0.35 _____ 7 15.7_0.338 _ 7 _ 2,119 84 (2,03_5) 82 426 200 200 48 6.5 4 312 _ 192 3,744 2,304 (1,440) 55 480 204 200 30.61 15 7 459 _ 214 3,947 2,568 (1,379) 2 499 204 200 2.587 30 7 77 18 662 216 (446) 24 385 204 200 5.47 15 7 82 38 705 456 (249) 95 473 200 200 6.95 6.5 7 _ 45 _48 540 576 36 50 499 822 202 2.71 _ 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5,577 _392 (5,185) 36 378 204 202 213 19.8 25 1 495 213 4,257 2,087 (2,170) 35 375 204 202 297 23.6 25 1 590 297 5,074 2,910 (2,164) 72 441 825 202 49 1.632 0.5 _ 1 24.5 49 1,715 480 _(1,235) 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 3,268 2,146_ (1,122) 46 460 204 202 7.64 30 15 229 114 1,969 1,117 (852) 57 495 204 202 7.31 30 15 219 109 1,883 1,068 (815) 44 458 204 202 7.1 30 15 213 106 1,831 1,038 (793) 43 458 204 202 7 25 15_ 175 105 1,505 1,029 (476) 37 391 204 202 66 4.62 25 1 115 _ 66 989 646 (343) 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 113 67 971 656 (315) 36 379 204 202 51 3.6 25 1 90 51 774 499 (275) 48 460 204 202 1.97 30 _ 15 59 29 507 284 (223) 49 460 204 202 1.13 30 _ 15 33 16_ 283 156 (1_2.7)_ 47 460 204 202 0.01 30 15 0 _0 0 _ 0 0 64 463 822 204 2.01 0.35 25 30.64446 _ 50 4,137 _ 430 __(3,707) 34 337 204 204 277 17.75 25 1 443 277 3,809 2,382 (1,427) 33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 165 165 1,419_ 1,419 0 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 168 168 _ 1,444 1,444 0 23 447 204 204 82.5 11 11 _ 907 _907 7,800 7,800 0_ 23 448 204 204 76.23 11 11 838 838 7,206 7,206 _ 0 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 _ 14 _ 14__ 120_ 120 0 35 375 811 811 6 1.5 1.5 392.04 392 16,073 16,073 0 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 0 Sorted on PC LUC & Net Change Page 5 0017842.01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC PC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 17,681 17,681 0 16 441 811 811 2.4 1 1 104.544 105 4,286 4,286 0 23 447 811 811 0 0.35 0.35 0 0 0 0 0 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 0.5 1 71.08992 _ 10.6 _ 4,976 3,695_ (1,281) 6 487 817 817 _ 0.61 0_._35 _ __0.35 9.30006 _ 9 325 _ 325 _0 _ _ 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 0-.35 5 _ 3 _ _43 117 74 51 363 204 817 1.03 15 0.35 15 _ 16 129_ 549 420 41 387 204 817 2.2 30 0.35 66 34 567 1,173 606 41 390 204 817 4 30 0.35 120 61 1,032 2,134 1,102 40 387 204 817 2.77 15 0.35 41 42 352 1,478 1,126 41 391 204 817 7 30 0.35 210 107 1,806 3,735 1,929 41 392 204 817 _ 7.7 _ 30 0.35 231 117_ _1.9_86 4,108_ 2,122 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 0.35 76.23-- 76 -- 10,291 10,291 --- 0 36 _379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6,860 6,860 0 37 391 825 825 1.98 1.5 1.5 129.3732 129 9,056 9,056 0 56 480 204 825 0.55 15 0.35 8 8 68 586 518 58 468 204 825 1.46 25 0.35 36 22 309 1,558 1,249 88 458 204 825 1.92 30 0.35 57 29 490 2,049 1,559 87 475 204 825 12.57 30 0.35 377 192 3,242 13,414 10,172 33 352 827 827 2.76 0.35 0.35 42.07896 42 2,103 2,103 0 83 374 827 827 4.14 0.5 0.5 90.1692 90 4,508 4,508 0 90 495 817 931 20.8 0.5 1 453.024 906 15,855 9 (15,846) 90 495 2041 931 41.8 25 1 1045 1,821 8,987 18 (8,969) 93 495 1101 931 16.37 0.5 1 356.5386 713 4,635 7 (4,628) 53 498 2001 931 56.28 6.5 1 365 2,452 4,380 24 (4,356) 82 520 2001 931 16 6.5 1 104 697 1,248 6 (1,242) 53 494 2001 931 10.41 6.5 1 67 453 804 4 (800) 75 398 8111 931 1.22 0.35 1 18.60012 53 762 0 (762) 78 511 2001 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 324 1 (323) 78 514 2001 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 _ 187 _ 324 _ 1 _(323) 78 415 2001 931 2.86 6.5 1 _ _ 18 125 216 1 _ (2. 15) 89 444 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 __ _ 0 24__ 0 _ (24) _ 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) NET TRIPS (59,737 Sorted on PC LUC & Net Change Page 6 0017842.01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC PC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 90 495 817 931 20.8 0.5 1 453.024 _ 906 15,855 9 (15,846) 90 495 204 931 41.8 25 1 1045 1,821 8,987 18 (8,969) 81 435 200 200 160 6.5 3 _ 1040 480 12,480 _ 5,760 (6,720) 50 499 822 202 2.71 0.35 15 41.31666 40 5,577 392 (5,185) 93 495 110 931 16.37 0.5 _ 1 356.5386 713 _ 4,635 7 (4,628) 53 498 200 931 _ 56.28 6.5 1 _ 365 _ 2_,_452 4,380 24_ _ (4_,3_56) 64 463 822 204 2.01 0.35 25 30.64446 50 4,137 430 (3,707) 19 404 204 200 73.37 15 7 1100 513 9,460 6,156 (3,304) 951 473 817 200 6.95 0.35 7 105.9597 48 3.708 576 (3,132) 86 381 825 110 3.264 0.35 0.5 _ 49.762944 _ 71 _ _ 3,483 924 (2,559) 36 378 204 202 213 19.8 25 _ 1 495 213_ _4,2_57 2,0_87 (2,170) 35 375 _ 204 202 297 23.6 25 1 _ _ 590 _ 297 _ _ 5,074 2,910 (2,164) 52 489 822 200 1.03 0.35 7 15.7033 _ 8 7 2,119 84 (2,035) 82 426 200 200 48 6.5 4 312 192 3.744 2.304 (1,440) ----- - - - ------ -- -- - ----.... ._ ..- - - - . 34 337 204 204 277 17.75 _ 25 1 _ 443 ___277 _ _ 3,809 2,38_2 __(1,4_27) 55 480 204 200 _ 30.61 15 _ 7 45_9 214 3,947 2,568 (1,379) 72 441 825 817 105.59 3.264 0.5 1 _ 71.08992 _ 106 _ 4,976 3,695 (1,281) 82 520 200 931 _ 16 6.5 1 _ 104_ _ _697 _ 1,248 _ _ 6 (1,242) 72 441 825 202 49 1.632 0.5 _ 1 24.5 49 1,715 480 (1,235) 36 380 204 202 219 15.2 25 1 380 219 3,268 2,146 (1,122) 46 460 204 202 7.64 30 15 229 _ 114 1.969 _ 1,117 (852) _57 495 204 202 7.31 30_ 15 219 109 1,883 1,068 (815) 53 494 200 931 10.41 6.5 1 67 453 804 4 (800) 44 458 204 202 7.1 30 15 213 106 1,831 1,038 (793) 75 398 811 931 1.22 0.35 1 18.60012 53 762 _0 (762) 43 458 204 202 7 25 15 175 105 1,505 1,029 (476) 2 499 204 200 2.587 30 7 77 18 662 216 _ (446) 37 391 204 202 66 4.62 25 _ 1 115 66 989 646 (343) 78 511 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 _ 324 _ _ 1 _ (323) 78 514 200 931 4.3 6.5 1 27 187 _ 324 1 (323) 74 473 204 202 4.52 25 15 113 67 971 656___ (315) 36 379 204 202 51 3.6 25 1 90 51 774 499 (275) 24 385 204 200 5.47 15 7 82 38 _705 456 _ (24_9) 48 460 204 202 1.97 30 15 _ 59 29 507 284 (223) 78 415 200 931 1 2.86 6.5 1 18 125 216 1 (215) Sorted on Net Change Page 7 0017842 01 X Trip Generation - Gen Plan ITEM SARA GPAC PC GPAC FAR PC FAR GPAC EST. PC EST. GPAC PLAN PC PLAN NET NO. TAZ LUC LUC UNITS or AREA or DU/AC or DU/AC UNITS UNITS TRIPS TRIPS CHANGE 49 460 204 202 1.13 30 15 33 16 283 156 (127) 89 444 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) 89 446 200 931 0.43 0.43 6.5 1 2 0 24 0 (24) I 33 352 204 204 5.51 30 30 _ 165 165 1,419 1,419 0 33 . 352 827 _ 827 2.76 0.35 _0_.35 42.07896 __4_2_ 2,103 2.103 0 _83 374 827 827 _ 4.14 0.5 0.5 90.1692 90 _ 4,508__ 4,_508 0 35 375 811 811 6 1.5 1.5 392.04 392 16,073 16,073 0 36 378 811 811 9.77 1.5 1.5 638.3718 638 26,173 26,173 0 36 379 825 825 1.5 1.5 1.5 98.01 98 6,860 6,860 0 36 380 811 811 6.6 1.5 1.5 431.244 431 _ 17,681 17,681 0 37 391 825 825 1.98 1.5 1.5 129.3732 129 _ 9,056 9,056 0 16 441 204 204 5.62 30 30 168 168 1.444 1,444 0 16 441 811 811 2.4 1 1 _ 104.544 105 4,286 4,286 0 23 447 204 204 82.5 11 11 907 907 7,800 7.800 _ 0 23 447 811 811 0 0.35 0.35 0 0 _ _0 0 0_ 23 448 204 204 76.23 11 11 838 838 7,206 7,206 0 23 448 822 822 5 0.35 _ 0.35 76.2_3 76 10,291 10,291_ 0 47 460 204 202 0.01 _ 30 15 0 0__ _ 0 _ 0 62 468 204 204 0.57 25 25 14 14 120 120 _0 6 487 817 817 0.61 0.35 0.35 9.30006 9 325 325 0 95 473 200 200 6.95 6.5 _ 7 45 48 540 576 _ 36 i� 62 468 204 817 0.22 25 _ 0.35 _ 5 3 43 _ 117 74 / 51 363 204 817 1.03 15 0.35 15 _ 16 129 549 _ 420 56 480 _204 825 0.55 15 0.35 8 __ 8 68 586_ 518_ 41 387 204 817 2.2 30 0.35 66 34 567 1,173_ 606 70 457 204 110 4.1 _ 15 0.5 61 89 524 1,160 636 41 390 204 817 4 30 0.35 120 61 1,032 _ 2,134 1,102_ 40 387 204 817 2.77 15 0.35 41 42 352 1,478 1,126 i 58 468 204 825 1.46 25 0.35 36 22 309 1,558 1,249 88 458 204 825 1.92 30 0.35 _ _ 57 29 490 2,049 1,559 41 391 204 817 7 30 0.35 210 107 1,806 3,735 1,929 41 392 204 817 7.7 30 0.35 231 117 1,986 4,108 2,122 87 475 204 825 12.57 30 0.35 377 _ 192 _3,24_2 __13,4_14 _10,172 NET TRIPS 59,737 1r Sorted on Net Change Page 8 0017842.01 I h PECITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUWINGTON BEACH TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director �24 VIA: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator U SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CHANGES DATE: March 13, 1996 In order to allow adequate time for review, I am distributing the proposed changes to the General Plan land use designations. The Land Use Element will be reviewed at a Study Session on April 8, 1996, and a Public Hearing on April 22, 1996. The attached maps assign a number to each area with a proposed change to the land use designation. The change is briefly described on the map. These maps, along with a cover letter, were distributed to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the area in question. The number on the maps corresponds to the Planning Commission Land Use Recommendations Matrix. This matrix provides more detail than the maps provide. The matrices describe the existing General Plan and Zoning designations, as well as the GPAC, Staff, and Planning Commission recommendations. In addition, the matrix provides a brief discussion of proposed land use changes and reasoning behind the proposed changes. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, Herb Fauland, Senior Planner, or Brian James, Assistant Planner, of my staff. cc Gail Hutton, City Attorney Connie Brockway, City Clerk Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner Herb Fauland, Senior Planner Brian James, Assistant Planner g:adminl1r96:396bj3 I 4� ZONING INDEX MAP oll �- 9-5-I I 10-5-I I DM 9 DMIII LEGEND s 19-6-10-SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE 16- II 15-5-11 14-5 11 DM 22-DISTRICT MAP 22 OM 18� OM 17 DM 15 P �I 24-5-12 19-5-11 0 5-11 21- -11 22-5-11 23-5-11 24 DM Go\ DM 21 Di D 24 DIV 25 OM 26 DM 27 a N30-5-1129-5-11 l2 27- -II 26-5-11 25- -11 � DM 34 `��DM 33 S DIV 32 M 31 DM 30 r —n32-5`II 33-5-11 �'` �;34 -11 35-5-II 36- -II DM 36 rDM 37 ! 38 M 39' DM 40i `% r- i 5-6-II - -I - 3-6-II 2 6-II I-6-II 6-6-10 5- -10 DM4 �' \ DM3 D� 2 �D I DM6 DM T 9-6-11 10-6-11 111-11 1 12-I-11 7-I-10 8-6-10 DM 10 OM DM 12 . r. DM 13 DM 7 DM8 � e V./17-6 13_6-II 18-6-10 -10 CITY OF14 DM2o• M19 HUNTINGTON BEACH I • ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA 24-6-I I9-6-10 / DM29 D lQ2/•oo.rm.••c,io.nu \ RYwafi[W.e3LtMt tK30.1Rdt pir tAUKrt•MdWMfI Yfl•N / 1GENERALPLAN EXISTNG1 1 1 1 ADVISORY 1NING RECOMMENDATIO 1 1 1 (Designation on DESIGNATION ® CG(Commercial I (Commercial Genera = _�� JtUtt■ y �j� ,WII � ���■� vit�iu� C �ttt�ltt■ � . � . . �■ � ■■lln� 1��1 �.�tt.tp ►mil■ : :1111■� 1111�~iiii� . M ■i■■■t■m■■i�� �•� ��1 �� ��n11111 1 i,�� Illl �� � � �/■tt■tt� C .. It1■ o .. ' 111rnn. �IIIHIII■HI IJ �. � Z � ■ln iv .■ln■nitl®lup . IMF min ��� 1®■a �� ��1� 1111■■ l�q� �1U111n11U■���.,C _: IV,.���■■■ � III vuullu-� �..i■n.■■nun® ��. � . � �►iteun-�� ■■n� ■■�n1u11 �1q�t■n ■■■■■t■� C. ; 1 1. - 1►�■u®■■ . ■■t►�■■ �Inll�l� �1�/�1■IN1111111�:■n�it�► WII■tr tr onMIN r/� _��t■. 1� .. mm ME � y �1ltltl :C �I�II►��IIIn ■■■IP �■■ y=,��■tlt�q� i ■■tt■ttt■■■tt® ■ I = � ■ ■� �� 11�■■� : ■■IlIll111nI111 1■ Ild■tr� ■rt�tl■tt■wtr■ .. .. ■■■ . ���■tl■■■t■i :� ita■ti■ nttnt■n■uli■ o �lttttlllt .. . .,. �l■ _ IIn■rr■ n111■■■rrm■t■ N Im o lt■ . ■ tl■■■■■■■ pp ttn■t■■ ■iiiilllllwti■ �: �: �■ItIn1111: Hilllrl.�.■IIIIIIIIIwII■ lis nlIluIMP lr� 11�1�111 •���� •' as ©D -WI v III Lm ml Imisr- IIIIIIII..IIIIIHill :B ���� t= J r■■t111� _,�� �� ��11111111 1111111�11���1�111: =IIIlllllllllllllll�IIIIIIII�I� - '� ■ ► Milll illlll �,���11: =IIIIIIIIIIIIilllll IIIIIII� � ' „ I �11�'1��� ��' �1�'■111 1 =IIIIII IIIII'1111111111111111\ ■■■ II� ,' � t♦� 11111 Illllllll! llllllllll IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII - ■ ����' ® ��1111 � 111� IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII Illllllltl flll(Ilil - - - ��� �:���=�► '� �'llll� 111ti(II(t (ilili(IIl 11(tli(I(i 111111111 illlliiifl Allllllll flllllllll IIIIIIIIII :IIUfl IIIIIIIII ME �C s= �����11 � 1111111111 I IIIIII illl� Illtllitltl_ IIUII_ lltilllllll_ IIIIIII_ SEEM, 1111111111111111111111 Ilillitllitliiit Itltttltlttttll ■ IiltllllMONSOONS 111111111111 111111110111 ��;�_ 'III"' :� llllllllllllilil Illlllllllif 111111111111 �Iilllllllllll 11111111�� �illllillll �111111111111111111111111111111111 -Eli - Illillll � ♦ �� IIIIIIIIIIII Illllllllllf _'�"'��C1� �illltlllilt IIIIIilllill ■ ` �' �11111111111111111► 1111_II� �11111111111r,�// ��1111 ► � WON { : DM 2 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN DESIGNATION (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION I b ity Council 12. RM(Residential OS-P(Open Space-Park) RM-0(Residential Medium Open Space-Park(OS-P) Medium Density) Density,Oil Overlay) 13. RM(Residential P(RM- 15)Public- RM(Residential Medium Public(P) Medium Density) underlying Residential Density) Medium Density 15 un/ac 14. RM(Residential P(RM-15)Public- RM(Residential Medium Public(P) Medium Density) underlying Residential Density) Medium Density 15 un/ac 15. IG(Industrial P(1)Public-underlying H.(Industrial Limited) Public(P) General Industrial 43. RM(Residential RMH-25(Residential RM-RMH(Residential Residential-Medium Density Medium Density) Medium High Density,25 Medium Density; Residential 15 du/ac un/ac) Medium High Density) 44. RM(Residential RH-30(Residential High RM-RMH(Residential Residential Medium Density Medium Density) Density,30 un/ac) Medium Density; Residential 15 du/ac Medium High Density) 45. RM(Residential CG-F1 (Commercial RM(Residential Medium Commercial General(CG- Medium Density) General Density 0.35 FAR) Density) Fl 46. RM(Residential RH-30(Residential High RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) Density,30 un/ac) Density) 15 du/ac 47. RM(Residential P(RH-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential High Density) 15 du/ac and add Public(P) Density,30 un/ac 48. RM(Residential P(RH-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential High Density) 15 du/ac and add Public(P) Density,30 un/ac 49. RM (Residential P(RH-30)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential High Density) 15 du/ac and add Public(P) Density,30 un/ac 65. OP(Office MV-F8-SP(Mixed Use CO-O(Commercial Office, Commercial Office(C042) Professional) Vertical,Density 1.5 FAR Oil Overlay) designation and remove [MU],0.35 FAR[C],25 Specific Plan du/ac 66. P,P-Q,I, RL-6-5(Residential Low RL-01 (Residential Low Residential Low Density 7.0 (Public,Quasi- Density,6.5 du/ac) Density,Oil Overlay) un/ac and add Public(P) Public, designation Institutional 67. RM(Residential RL-6-5(Residential Low RL(Residential Low Density) Residential Low Density 7.0 Medium Densit Density,6.5 du/ac du/ac 69. RM(Residential P(RM-15)Public- Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Residential Medium Density Medium Density) underlying Residential (Residential Medium 15 du/ac and add Specific Medium Density 15 du/ac Density/IV-1) Plan SP 70. IG(Industrial RM-15(Residential IGIIL(Industrial General/ Industrial(IGF2) General) Medium Density 15 du/ac Industrial Limited 88. CG(Commercial RH-30(Residential High CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG- General) Density 30 un/ac Fl f 1 DM 3 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered DESIGNATION DESIGNATION b Cit Council 23. Industrial- MH-Fl-30-SP M2-Ol-CZ; Mixed-Use Horizontal; Resource (Mixed Use R4-O-CZ;Cl-O CZ(Industrial recommend F2-30(5 FAR,30 Production Horizontal,Density General,Oil Overlay,Coastal Zone; du/ac); recommend"average" 0.35 FAR,30 un/ac, Residential High Density,Oil density of 15 dulac Specific Plan) Overlay,Coastal Zone;Commercial Neighborhood,Oil Overlay,Coastal Zone 89. RL(Residential RL-6.5(Residential R1-O-CZ/RL(Residential Low Open Space-Park(OS-P) = Low Density) Low Density 6.5 Density,Oil Overlay,Coastal du/ac Zone/Residential Low Density) SL a J •\ .'t•• •`` d _ :• WN INUTL^ •SEALL F V7UNTRY ...1.19 _.F COURSZ o-• .�•) nai - • }..n ftLa Ul �i5AVE 2-3 SEE 'DM 10 , . t DM *4 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING NO GENERAL ADVISORY COMMISSION . PLAN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION (Designation to be considered by City Council 23. Industrial- MH-F1-30-SP M2-01-CZ;R4-O-CZ;C1-O CZ Mixed-Use Horizontal; Resource (Mixed Use (Industrial General,Oil Overlay,Coastal recommend F2-30(.5 FAR, Production Horizontal,Density Zone;Residential High Density,Oil 30 du/ac); recommend 0.35 FAR,30 uu/ac, Overlay,Coastal Zone;Commercial "average"density of 15 Specific Plan) Neighborhood,Oil Overlay,Coastal du/ac Zone rd n- i7r nt• q iF 9 �o J 'so •+• \ •Y•Ti••TO• •[ e[M 00 A "� Z3ti AM us 0 F, • q DM 5 No Land Use Changes USE OF PROPERTY MAP r 4� I 1 I � ''��C I 11 1 •Y !� GARFIELD' = ! I I ! rIUNTINGTON 9E AGN I` 'u� SArOA J D4 l Gm Ilil I I ! lii I i li 777 1 �(--T--{• I �—— �svND!• e. i III ! I ! II ! 11 � � �- Ly / % i I I• I� �J r i F- E3 FFT •+AVE. I ! Illlllllli,/ �! 111 ! I ! Ill ; ill! ! Ill � ill i / m• ED4q<-RAL DP - YDN:Tyi p5 X �N I jllllllj 1 "LLET FORGE C4. S.ANG4' 1 i ' IIIIIjiI I ! 1 � : I IIIIIIIi I � / • I 1 � II IIIII I � / � ME 441WC I DR_ I /' Ilii II ! ! j I II CF_E % I I ; Illill ; li � , I ! i i liii _ �Y ISYA41t DR }s�r,5 I : 1 yI I •11YD11 O4 III ! II I i I I � il Eq II I I = Z WWETANIA ' y O m a Q j :.,Ra::.:c!:.:: ' I � �T i-- ADAMS AVENUE 1 I GENERALPLAN EYJSTING1 W10XIIIJAIM K-11-i1 1ADVISORY1 1 1 DESIGNATION COMMITTEE DESIGNATION RL(Residential CN-F1 (Commercial Q-CG-FP2(Qualified, Commercial Neighborhood Low Density) Neighborhood,Density Commercial General, (CN-Fl) I i i i i RL(Residential RM-15(ResidentiI' (Residential Residential Low Density 7.0 Low Density) Medium Density,15 Manufactured Home Park) du/ac designation and add i Home i 1 CG(Commercial RM-15(Residential CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG-FI) Medium Density, designation i ■iaiiiiiili Clllllfl � � 1111■/ � ii it i� i ,■■■■ Scii■■U■� ■ M��� i:■111111111111111■ � n ;ii �� � � Illlll�l�n.._��� � - •1��111111111111. s -- -- -- _ ■ �■11�111111111■Iei■ ■■1■1■1■■■IIIIIi���� HIIIIIIIIIIIIi1D � - �I ��1111111111111 11111 11 ■1 1 1 11 � � C : _ -• -Z■ 1111=1 � -• ■"=111III MINN CF-E11111U- i �_ i11i C iiMEMMM 1i11I111111■� / i =(TALBERT SCHOOL) M M i �i �Ir / ■111■1■111111■� '�' /. .. q . ■111■1■1111111. -■IIn1111111■• / i i/.MM ■ / /4 .■■ -1 '■ - ..: . - .. .. .. ■111111111111 - . ■1 ■U -E ■ .: :._ :_. ._ :_�\■■■■// /n11 Iu1111i■�� - IIi111■U■1■IIi■/ a i�.iM 3a�4-?�iM ':: .■��_ � 11111■1■ ■111■�� � •■1111■■1111■1111■ �!�� �: M 111!/I 1111111�� ��•flt ■�■■■■■� ■��� � : -11UIN1111®■ �� �:� M \� 1111111 = =��\1u11111: � : :IIIUfl1111�■ 5- - j■j.W��� 1111111•� / // �1�� �n � � �IIIIUIIIIOW Y■1 1■111■f1� i ■IH111 .11111U11111■■■ ■�� 1111111�� • •• •vi.1� : �1 111 Ni 111�i 1n111 u111lINS MINI i11111n1 ' �.:1���III�W� III���IIn1 _ •■111�1111 111111111111111■i� : ,■1„"C=='=i1YC� i■U■�iiniulnlm■� iiii�1 � 11 III ■ � ■ ■: ■■1111■i■�■1■■■■■■�� ,..-. ^1���11\ RUN ME MW ,.u• v ®D VD �D ,- ' - - - _ . � ��tIH1111111;■IIt1�111111�I� ��1�1�1111-p��►I��I��11 11111-1tltttl� ' C CC-11111l11l1■p:■1■!!1! : � III�01 pp =p•== IIIIt1111111�111 � p pp Illttlttl/C 11■��p_ C_ ���111��■■1 pi CC �C'CC����/��/C C .-•.- .. ...-. - - - • •- IIIIIlIfI�. .. •- i.'C■-i'C r. s- rr _ - , C.Ci•1l111111\`C.-J`- __ • p C� ���III�1�! -.•- -r;r. -- r 1RIMI1l11!!� �• .- . - \1111111! . r. .. r. r- _ - _ �AI��Il�1� CC lIIIIIIIil1\��� CC.0 C C' C���"'W C ■Ilttllttlttittl C p Ca rC C= r. 1IIHIIIIII1I1■■ CCi �r \s I■Ifl 1 TiiC p ll11111111111 C IIII • •• _• •• lIIIIII ■llltltltl �IIIl111111f1l111 Ir�C/l1 It111�11■1 Ci Ci•CC 1111/1 !l111111/� C�IIIIIIn111111l11■ �tI1111H11! r �1111tt111111l11■ C "1III t/ - ■■I■■r r� t111111! ■ i�� � p�■■IIHIIIIIIII � � .. �� �:1,u r ti. ■IIt1111111�• = Q■■■■■■ O ! �■■-CC-■■I �1111111 C �I .III/��I�• r■■III, C =. CC �p ■II■11■HII■ IIH1H C • ■\ �C - IIIIIIIIC �11 I� - "0 M- �� •• �;• -111111111 ■I■ C - r III 1\�. �� ■1 r - .. �. - .r . . . _ � p:111�1/�����.�� ■I! �� �I���I, C CC-�C �- CC CC:■IIIIt1 1� ��.C r 1K111\�.� ...rr -- 111'�� - �. �. _. _. .- pl1111 t111■►r ■ !U 111111111■ /!■ Ci \i -C i11C��\ C ■1■ �!■'�. C= CC ■IIItI�t111ffl. iN■IIIIIn11in1lfr :I��I��D ■i1■��J �■i1111111111��. :►I■IIIIIIIIIIi1111►� looloomill • ■■■■■■■■■■ ■I■ 1�1■II■IC HIW1111 111111111/� I111111tHOUR Sm I/r Ci ■■■■■■■■■■:��■I■,� �111� iC ii i jI ■� C.CC . r. -.. N■■■1■■11 ■ ME _ lltIIIII/Ii -- C�\■■■■■■ C',I �IIIIII� iCme SM WIN II�■ C .. �11lIIIII�. .. \■■■■■■ C!�\ •,■. ..:.. ram.- r . ... .. -- --.■ .��■■n�■ CiI/1Igo - ..UNION man Igo ME M -. - - 1111l11111l1�1�I■!!!■lli��►�illli � � I/IIIIIIIItI111111111�� - _ �IIIII11111�1111/��I�I`�■IIIIIIr-■ ��■■■II■I��,��."pia i�i►�l1 .��.:,.�: . . �r ram'■� /� � � 'C � - ��Q�.��iCZ�CC C��Cif IIIt !11ltIt1111■. go - -- -� I =■ `•■�: r111 OIIUIIII CC: -=�■ III■■ .r ■U■I�IOnN .,, I P-1 milli 111 Z ■�1/■ -111 � ■■■I Qa BROOKKAST STREET --7 -7 C) rTj r7 Uj A IT. LIIIE A h A 4 IVA cn (D cn 00 •tI •CN L r f I1-1IU-In1-1, cn bD 4 11 J 'f1; le N0IYPIYN 'l �J� ]�I-1 ri ,1 : .� - �����lt]UUVU ....................................... ............. C13 HO —s is We vY'J — _ — 1 j•• 1� J\J� a °\q W Z \ = N J N i W r 1. �f EXISTING 1 1 1NG PLANNING COMMISSION 1GENERALPLAN COMMITTEEZONING 1 1 1 DESIGNATION DESIGNATION &lall i RM (Residential 1 (Commercial CG(Ci i n i i i Medium Density) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 General) 7i FAR,Design Overlay) �• i ' � 1 (Commercial inn ' i Medium High Density Neighborhood,Density 0.35 General) du/ac and add Public(P) Design OverlayY DM 11 No Land Use Changes %EST N-'IS'E c AVE J I L I 1rL , ZE --E 7.i — _•Cr 4 I ` J _ O f' ..LctA. ! _ CF-E ------ _I O fc\ i s � AIL4'Ifi Dq _- I Iz A A I US .-I R.I.QLE"Oca J I I 4A �;� A_I♦v v l.I,T[[ z A DR (�P 4 IV71V CA CAS CF-E CF-E JR. CA V..., CA AELSET Cw w.AYOMT CA I/ I C�—R .ACw. l.A ww OA I. O 2 ' ! kt9l . . . . . . . N W I-EL Ip. DA W J O a3t c_ � t7 o t D c r C o BOLSA AVE v ���111t1111111111N111111 ■i•�� ' nw nunuw . = 11111�1111111111111111 � � ����,`� i � IIIIIII = 110111mmumull INIIIH IIIIII IIIIIII = ■1■ 111111111 111111 1111111 ■p = �� IIIIIII = 11111 NIIURN INN11 IIIU1 IIIIIII�� IIIIm1 Homill HOAR 1111111111111111 11111011111111110111 �� 1 = 1nUI 1111I11 IIDOMINION HII■ p11I1 IINOU p111111 MINI 111111 pop 111 11111s 1U n1NIN NI11U 111111 N111NN . 1 IIINII NNNNI ■HNI allia- ■111I 11 E 1E1 .. onlimiummul 11111 muma 11N11 1111■ 111111I 1111111 ■N11 I1U1U ■IIII No _ate manoloolull Hrs II11 UUIII.I11.1�1INI 11111I I111■ IN1NU I■UU 117 = III'lII1 BE ME WO MO mom 111E H]I m Niiiiiiiiiill 1111111111111 IM11111111UII1 IIMINII1NU111N11" 'lla `11UIUII 1111011111 IUIUNUUINNI ' ilillllilllliil•iillliifilillili ilililillliliilliilfill� �1 _� ®111111U11N NIIII. 01. 111amp '�G"•�' NO M111MIN1. SIR �� �� �d ��►��� "�"�!�IPl 111� �%� / i //,m./its. a ` DM 12 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN DESIGNATION (Designation to be DESIGNATION considered by City Council 9. RM(Residential OS-P(Open Space-Park) OS-PR-FP2(Open Space, Open Space-Park(OS P) Medium Density) Parks and Recreation, Flood lain 11. RM(Residential CN-Fl-D(Commercial CG(Commercial General) Commercial Neighborhood Medium Density) Neighborhood,Density 0.35 (CN-Fl-D) FAR,Design Overlay) 58. CG(Commercial RMH-25(Residential Medium CG(Commercial General) Commercial General(CG- General) High Density,25 unlac Fl 61. RM (Residential P(CN- 1)Public-underlying . RMH-A(Residential Residential Medium High Medium Density) Commercial Neighborhood, Medium High Density, density and add Public(P) Density 0.35 FAR; Small Lot Subdistrict) P(RL-22)Public-underlying Residential Low Density, 22 un/ac 62. Mixed RMH-25-D (Residential CG/RMH-A(Commercial Mixed Use Horizontal(MH- Development Medium High Density,25 General/ F1-25) un/ac,Design Overlay) Residential Medium High Density,Small Lot Subdistrict EXISTING 1 • ' ZONING 1 COMMISSION'. 1GENERAL COMMITTEEDESIGNATIONE RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN (Designation i be considered , 1 • City Council) . •L(Residential i� CN-Fl (Commercial CG(Commercial Commercial Neighborhood 'L(Residential CN-F1 (Commercial CG-FP2 Commercial Neighborhood 1Neighborhood,Density 0.35 FAR) (Commercial General, FI) Floodplain ,mmercial General, CG(Commercial Mixed Use and :d, Specific Density I Overlay Mi IDii111 11i!! �. �� : UIi111i gnu!■ � '�� �IC �� �■� �■■-!!t = Ifni in M . 111! longNMI -- w .. OI II■■�� i �wHIRE/ !!!!!! �- 111�11!!■■ �iilogo llll C 1111�►,w �� � /!! 1lIU! mail %� ► n�!��iiiiiiiiii :� ■liliii� ��� uli�u:luwlnlun�/ :. : .1 lilllll! .■ . �►� ta■■■■n=■Inn tt i� i ii ii'i� w� ' �-�,�� 1 nmun■■ w■u��l/■� a a� a:°:I.■i!n!/ ■■!!■a 1�iliililr►� �■ll■Ilmu w�Y l�Millluu! ■11/I CC 00 00 �� ■Id, Mi MM �i ullr�, all- . .� .. .. �i is WE milli so M■III .w mill IS m '�wll/1 �C i■H/ �1 �i i v�1 ■11■IIIBom in �iM � IIIIINln1ll -: '�!I!in �■� 1111i1��111!!1 �- 1:>M 14-a S55 AIACiie,*42 �J t ATLANTA It AVE as t •save w_ t 1.. r i • � a n ul 25 Ilil I lob; Y • _ 1 C F-R 00 ti i I t� � ,T�• �- 1 i 5 �III;III , ROTARY ° M U D - C s _ o D U M P a" EDRAT CM S 2 S ��q.r[w PACIFIC OCEAN Oo 0 Cb u Is DM 14 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council 4. RL(Residential Low P(RL-6.5)Public- RL(Residential Low Public(P)designation; retain Density) underlying Low Density Density) maximum 7.0 du/ac' Residential,6.5 un/ac 5. Recreation P(Public) RA-RL(Residential Public(P)designation to identify Agriculture,Residential utility right of way Low Density) 54. RM(Residential RL-6.5/RH-30 Magnolia Pacific Specific Residential Medium Density 15',' Medium Density) (Residential Low Plan du/ac designation and add Specific Density,6.5 un/ac, Plan Overlay Residential High Density,30 un/ac 57. CG(Commercial RH-30(Residential RH (Residential High Residential Medium Density 15 General) High Density,30 un/ac) Density) du/ac RM (Residential RH-30(Residential RH (Residential High Medium Density) High Density,30 un/ac) Density) 90. 1) OS-C(Open MH-F2-25-SP(Mixed 1) RA-0- Agree with Staff; recommend retain Space-Conservation; Use Horizontal,Density CC-CZ- existing designations as 2) VSC(Visitor 0.5 FAR,25 du/ac, FP2 (Residential recommended by the California Serving Specific Plan) Agriculture,Oil Overlay, Coastal Commission Commercial) Coastal Conservation, 3)&4)RM Coastal Zone,Floodplain (Residential Medium 2) VSC-CZ-FP2 Density) Visitor Serving Commercial,Coastal Zone,Floodplain 3) MH-CZ-FP2 (Mobile home,Coastal Zone,Floodplain 4) M1-A-O-CZ-FP2 (Industrial Limited,Oil Overlay,Coastal Zone, Floodplain) 93. Planning Reserve I-F2-D(Industrial, MI-A-O-CC-CZ- Agree with Staff; recommend retain Density 0.5 FAR,Design FP2(Industrial Limited, existing designations as Overlay) Oil Overlay,Coastal recommended by the California Conservation,Coastal Coastal Commission Zone,Floodplain) I TM 16 AZA686D -1f OOLSA AVE ....,` C t- N O Cm I �(K s S(O.(,YOr h a 7� fqy a �i Y ! .r(rarrw C err U T 0 1 I ES, .NST IF INuNTINC704 BE�CNj I I T WHITNEY Op M c . •^ I (KaC3T,Ca- -_ I f�.` 4w a I 2 \Tr V O I W STMl!T[ Z � rC r.D^r frG.a ,r( CITT ES•*:i NSTEu 33 y �q 1 f`r4 a J C►-E `- a CF-E - I.. CENTER — n u I c W m Lj 2 L z o Ck I _ ^ Dew rl } � r DM 15 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council- 29. P,Q-P,I(Public, P(CG-Fl)Public- PS(Public Semi Commercial General(CG-Fl)and add Quasi-Public, underlying Commercial Public) Public(P)designation Institutional) General,Density 0.35 FAR 32. CG(Commercial CR-F2-D CG(Commercial Commercial Regional(CR-F2-D) General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overla 33. P,Q-P,P(Public, MV-F8-D(Mixed Use RL(Residential Mixed Use Vertical(MV-F8-D) Quasi-Public, Vertical,Density 1.5 Low Density),IG Institutional)MD FAR[MU],0.35 FAR (General (Mixed [C],25 un/ac) Industrial),CG-H Development) (Commercial General-High Rise Overla 34. CG(Commercial MV-F9-SP(Mixed CG(Commercial Commercial Regional-FAR.5-Specific General) Use Vertical,Density 1.5 General) Plan(CR`-F2-SP)) ' FAR[MU],0.5 FAR C ,25 un/ac 84. Mixed Use I-F2-D (Industrial, 1L(Industrial Industrial(I42-D) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Limited) Overlay) 85. Mixed Use CO-F4 (Commercial North Huntington Mixed Use and add Specific Plan(SP) Office,Density 1.25 Center Specific designation FAR) Plan area 91. Mixed Development RMH-30(Residential North Huntington Mixed Use and add Specific Plan(SP) Medium High Density Center Specific designation 30 du/ac Plan DM 16 No Land Use Changes yam• poa t ATLANTA I STREET L • (� 'II' z� � .•,`. r\ I •.it4]lL.Y-.�• i• ..4dKilMbo I d� WA Erg I .� .. MM MM MMM M M ME MM MM MM MM r. ... .M MM•�111111�� /i1111i .. .. .. .. ..-. .. .. .. .. .. .. .M .. .. MW MM M six MM MM MM MM oil oil MOM MMM MMZ MMS CoM �■�■■11i ■IIr111 om ■■ i� ��.■Ii�� /•111_Ii "C �.'UM MM �� �IIIII1M�i `■1I11■ MM =111111111i a. �11N1■ r111111i1111I�i �� �� •�� �� ■I111 . .. M. . �111111I11111I1 Si ME 111 ii ■II�� 1IIIIII �`, ■11111111■ MM MM �1I1I� �.r•Z�� .. .M M. . .. .. /����111111I�11111i M� �� rM r� ■II\� ■■111I1 M .. .. �1■11� .. .. C. �. .. E. _�1i1111111111■ �� �� r� r� ■■■�� /■IIIi■ MC ME HIS `l11111�1 MM INN1� �!■■ 11111111111\1. ... �. .. .. \■■1�IM•\11■111I11111■1■ ■■■ ■■■ ■■■�� ■1111�I/� i� �� >.1INI� S 11119 M II11I 111■1■1i �111 r IIIIIIi �� 11I11I1III1111I1 I11 '�11N11 C: 11IIi1111r �!I ��MIi �1II1II1III1 �111Il ' r ri ii: mi1111111I1\�i �IlIi1 � r 1,�� IIIIIIIIII 1N11 � 1/IIII■ �� ■I■:■I111111111II11■ iII1I� � �� IIIIIIIIII!��I�I ��II � �111111 �� �11111111 .••.•• •• •INII ■I1111■ �� oil 11111111111112711I �1I11/ r r �11111111 �i �i �i IIIi r r �� ME WM �� M� rIII11 /I 1 ■III■111■111■III■III■11/�11►� .�.ii ii ii ii ii 'M f111111 iM i� ,� i�.i� ii i�\IIIIIIi :■IIIIII/, . .. r..r. •.. .... . .._.r .. . • �� •• r� �• �� • �� �� 11111111111111111- r 11111111Ii ■11111111■� ■■■■■\l ■■111111■ III Ili �'II11111l11111IM1� • ■i1■!■ \11111111111 I111� r 11I111I11■. 1 �■I11111■ MM MM 1�1�NI1111111�� i- _.� �: ■11■■■■1■i/1��� 1��1111l11111I1111111I111■1■ MM �11 MC0 0 : S ■■11i � M.: C� ��f`I 1lI11I11I11I11I1!I1lI11I11I11I!1! 111l1!1/1,11111 i MM . :a :: . 11111 11111 .. .r .W .. .�� :: : :: i: :: 111/l loll MM MM MM WIM .II ■ Nis ■� MM MM WIM 1I MM ME 11/111111/ 11l��111111 �I1111111 .. .. .. i■1111/ ■■IIIIIIi IIIIIIi i111111111■ �� �� �: .. .. imilli /■IIIIIIi ��111111! 1111, .. - �IIIIIi i1111Mill MM ii iMM MM i �AM,'01I�,� ��11•11�111111 �11�; iI1I1111111111111111 ■I111111I■M ■■11■1- �lI111III ��.i11l1!!1l1111� ��I1fI1II 1111111111M 111/ifi 1iII111II Il1III1��� - : CD �C �� :�-�� �111111 ■■■� �" ��'��-:� �� � ��111lI111■ MMMMMM r•.. Imo. ..... .. al . .. .. .. .� �� � ,■-• �M Alms JL J i ii ii'ii iI/11� ' 1 1 i i 1i i i I n n i i i i l ol l 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 anauvw0a1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DM 18 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council) 80. IG(Industrial P(I)Public-underlying IL(Industrial Industrial(I42) General) Industrial Limited BOLSA III AVE. r N IL H � N N OC[ 1i I• ARGOSY 6!f tS f � _ T i - I I TA wN 0R — z ¢ w Ej l � GALWAY CR _ fINAN GR. & a m j a�. Mc FADDEN AVE ...,: I CF-E 7 u OOvfw00D DR 2 J z OVAiL7 CR J GGG I I FLAMINGO CR MaLUEJAYilli T L r I o ' cKvss Irl u ROOiM+D00 OR C F-E I.T I I a V'z't:J HG W °R= CF-R W 0 — ID o I SKYLARK DR- `Sy9• ti L� / EDINGER AVE. —'� DM 19 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION DESIGNATION City Council) 51. CG(Commercial RM-15(Residential CG-FP2 (Commercial Commercial General(CG-FI) General) Medium Density, 15 General,Floodplain) un/ac I AT LAN TA AVE. IL a a JOANN ST m i u l pll DARRE LL ST 0 y IV 1 �I 1 � _ I /r/ wIL SON ST �u U CAPITAL ST 14' O Q � SENATE ST. L_J—� " C CONGRESS ST C ` COIERNOR 57 V CTOR.. 5T ED Y / z Q � i HAMILTCN > .ILTON Sr / GLENEAGLE f OAK Si TER LINDEN PL ., \ TER 71< Z � m _ GROIE P < �I 2 \ .Z . GiT OF NE wPORi BC w7Ci. 7 i 1 1 IL ! 1 20 ST I � < 2 > O EY RGREEN PL C 2 O DOGw000 5T 1 J CEOAR ST 1 r. / CITY Of COSTA ME5w� `—�• i STRIP IN CITY OF NEwPOR'- BEACH �] —^ lol:o \■f1t11f/fflM w ooNi�nii �1111 11 ltiltt111nt11n11i �11� � i \�u ltnnlnill■ ��l11 tt 11ttt11 � _ - " _ 1 �\■Illtlfniff.f■ �It � • -w � = ll ■11111t11�11111'i'-r'� ■Ii 11f ��►�� �� � �� ii•��.i-.- 'S gill milli i �!llll!!!! ■111f/�/' �\I■ Q ff �f11milif ■ff■�. - - C 111111t11111tI1f � 1 ��-�'� � � !t i Q � ��'�� ■fffffl � .i1t11i111i11/�� i f 1 j`j%; = ��h i. •� •• ■ Iff! . • • i1111f111i1 •• - f11 if -� 1 1 ..� ; ■ milli 11111111111■ •i - ■ ■ - ` i111/,. 1HIM tflH/tl /11 ■1f 11 �. - i � - •.-i `/11 Itl - 1111I�� ■! �■1 �1 � � � � IIt111 :: �lil�ltl � _ _ I� 11511 11■ !• : ii�i�i� Mil l�� - - �Ii��11111� :� I11111111 �llHillill� 111t11 - 5 If1lllfffD if1II • �__ � - llff111fff IIIf�►� - E-.':� e � .. .j-.. \/.� .V J• --...---�------ii�/MrND ♦ltl]Nlr 7M tR � � \ )J ,jllylLrilLn� - j 5 f Trrm mMmrr a A � i kl ir (73 Ici ir r^ Z ,. l 1. \>.,�// I, •,�+ f \ `N .,,� /� ►� 0-1 _ N 0 Avg o G ` ` 4J O \�\V S�.` PO � \ )�' 1. J d, \�•k I P4 ►ot �e�l VY *04 ly J ♦ NV P�J 41 di G o G eP`� w r r 1n �� ►r • �rR �T7 DM 22 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION DESIGNATION Council 1 RL(Residential CN-F1 (Commercial CG-FP2(Commercial Commercial Neighborhood(CN-F1) Low Density) Neighborhood,Density General,Floodplain) 0.35 FAR 53. OS-C(Open RL-6.5(Residential Low LUD-CZ-FP2(Limited Open Space Conservation(OS-C) Space- Density,6.5 un/ac) Use District,Coastal Conservation Zone Flood lain BANNING a. • •� � w ao C. • a o 3Lijig � raaw o.. � " • � � J 7 � u a.• a u • Y o Q ^�� • e e � i I I I I (_j_J � • N i 3 W 4 4 •o�uu o.. o •' ' 3 000 o ¢ W s —o N a r • ' �I • o• < < o a oN u C � DR/NMPSly J '�i�' `L 11�J ■U �' O �CQ 0P0 O �Pr Z Cy C. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION TREATMENT c PLANT C07s o T CA- vZ,, V - A �� O H e C1^ ^. u c Y on '�i► - .��` �` AIL • - I/jj��1 j ��`■111■�.III. f1111f � ��� ���f��•�� - _ IWA 11� •�� r/j�I�tff•f11111111f �� � �1r���,������'��� �.� - _ •♦ ♦♦`i♦ .•� .� �� 11\� �a off _ 11ngoINS � 1/1/� •♦ ♦♦ - IIf�� 1111low 1�����• - I , I� 1111111111 —� ,•�■■It■■■■■■■■■ ■■./IIIIIIIIf - — _ 1111111111 - ` ••mm ME •. ftIng • -- -- -- 1111111111 `� m •� ••:•• •• •• _ - - . .� .. .. .. .. f11111� 1111111111 111111111 ���t�t11t •� •• WE •• •• f1111r1 n�—��-1111111111 11111 111 � � � •� •• •• •• •• f1111�1 . .. .. .. .. .. 11111111111 1111111111 •• �� •• •• �'.�, 1 11: 1111111111. � -- • �C.••-.I/IIIIIIf ftttt■1 - _ _ IIIIII� 1111111111 : i � � �� .f11111111f f11111f - - . IIIIIIIIII.IIfiBilllll ?' � f1!IItlltfr� IIIIIIIIII 1111111111 ' _ iffftlo ,11111/� : f11111111f • - - IIIIIIIIII1111111111 = - - - - - Illlllllll 1111111111 =€ _� �� _ � flf11f11t11ff _ _ Elm ' 22== 111■111� ■����■ a.. .a�a��' �v t ��i111ii1.� r■ - �■■■WE ��r{ - III�yI �MR Emmons ilr■ �■■lima �i111i1 till —•►• ■11111 .!� C. ... . ■■1111■ C ® ��111 WIN ► � � �/11 r1�Ii�► ■IItIr - � ���►�►��1■111111■t■ ■1111■u1uu111� �•u■■sa■■u ■■■Uma■ 11■1\�- - �...... . .. .. .-. IN MIN 1/rI- -. 1111111111/11/1111•�• �� - •M •• �• •• •• ��■ �� 111U1111111■111U ■■ �i . i iiMIN W"NWIN ii ii iiWIN ii 111111111 w .. WIN . o a .. .. .. -. �� -- ■ IN . .- .. .. .. .. Im ■i■. .: �: � : == : �111■111■■/11111/1■11■�■� �.1• �� �� w � �� � ��Ut■■O■111■11i11111/1111iii111m11/1/ -- - IN ■ -- - . - -. ■1111111111111 i ii ���11111U1111■ �i iWIN i=IN` �;�■1111111D11mm Ills IME N 1�1■1■■1n1■■11■ ii - IN . 110 ii I11111■■11■ �111111111111111■ o - i i i Ci mW i' \■■■1■■ ��■■■■ ■■n■■■■■1!■■11■ = : : :: Wallis■� all IN :CM ■1■1■■■11■ ■ �I11� ■11111■11111111■1►i i1■■1t■ 1n■111�►� ■i■■11 LEl■■o�■�■� ■ ■1■■■■ ■1■■■■■■1■■■■■■■■ ■1�■1■■■1 ■■11■n■■■■■ ■■■■�I■11111■■ AUYJ , . , u. , mmpajV ppuappaHuu , lit; i , , , • , I , , . , . 1, , , i . , , , , i . Rpm1 um,, i . , .10fu3s)US i 1 1 1 1 1moilvMOISMaaiuilqwoj1 AHOSIAGV KVrId rWH3X3f) 1 r ' �� �►� '11111111■11111111■ ■ - _ IIIIfIi�11�C1 9 E VICII�I�IIIIIIC■ :� :: 9 VAI 111111111111� , 1■ .i. 11. ��II�Ii1�1111�1� � 1 111 111 U Q�� �� ■ ■■ - " 1.1 40 �6 . �11111■ham �� ECI�IOiQCI�•� IIIIi1�u111111111111ii�'• •11 �S■�r� : 1■1■IHIn1111f111f1/� ���CIIC� C �i�ii'��i�i ■■■■ �Iy111711■ 11111■•■11111■1�� � _ ■■ m : ��j p =p IIn� 0= pi1C■III.Iu�1■ - - II■■1111 ■ �. . �1.■�� - �_ -■1 1 11111111■ �IIn11/� 1111■11� ��. � �� - �- � " -■ 1 111 1 11 - = ■:■CI�III�CI�IIC•Ci - - - 1 11111■1111111 - - i11�►_-EiIIQ�llil - � a5 � � -�.�. :IIIlllll :►`••"■•■■•■■••••� nInI111n Illllllii wj FE ■1■1■11■11■111■ 111■In!!� �� ��� '■• HomeI IONS I ■ �� ��f- �� Sri � ►11nlfff If1 °IIIIIIIII� ���' �� - � o-��■ IIIIIiIiI� ■U■IUIi i' � = i - . � i ■ � ii �I- �����till �il�ll�■■1�■.■i �� �-aii ilk®11 IIII�� \■1111■IIi NI/� . ..pv■ 1 �� NNN!!■■■! . nil ®PEW �1®� Iffftfff■If t111111 � r• � m�I■■01111■11 ���� w IN �� -- � � ■In11■11t�1 �. �■�i� � � .. •fir�� ... .. ' • �■u C-. :,:-:_._�► �������� - III 1�■u ntu / � 1-010 n1 ��lii■ fit,■■ .�: � - ; . ..,,�•' , ■IIIII � r.■■.1� ii��n�l�ip IMI��i s DM 26 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered by City DESIGNATION Council 30. CG(Commercial CR-F2-D CG(Commercial Commercial Regional(CR-F2-D), General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overlay) 31. CG(Commercial CR-F2-D CG(Commercial Commercial Regional(CR-F2-D) General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overla 35. CG(Commercial MV-F10-D-A CG-RMH-RM Mixed Use Vertical,decrease density; General) RMH (Mixed Use Vertical, (Commercial from 25 to 15 du/ac (Residential Density 1.5 FAR[MU], General; Medium High 1.5 FAR[C],25 du/ac, Residential Density)RM Design Overlay,Auto Medium High (Residential Overlay) Density; Medium Density) Residential Medium Density) 36. CG(Commercial MV-F10-D-A CG-RM Mixed Use Vertical,decrease density General)RM (Mixed Use Vertical, (Commercial from 25 to 15 du/ac (Residential Density 1.5 FAR[MU], General; Medium Density) 1.5 FAR[C],25 du/ac, Residential Design Overlay,Auto Medium Density) Overla 38. RH(Residential P(RMH-25)Public- RMH(Residential Residential Medium High Density and High Density) underlying Residential Medium High add Public(P)designation,does decrease Medium High Density, Density) density from 35 to 25 du/ac 25 un/ac 83. IG(Industrial CR-F2-D 1G(Industrial Commercial Regional(CR-F2-D) General) (Commercial Regional, General) Density 0.5 FAR,Design Overlay) I - - �� i iiiiiliiiiiiiiiiii=■ i iiiiiiiiiiiii�ie ■ �• •• MIA",•• •• ItI' II ■II:111 _ _ ■■1►ttt■■� � :��7 �■t11tI� IIIIIIIIIIIIII�Iil1E1111111�� ��11111[ A molls miss as WAS . •�.� . i.�r ■r L MINN loll ► , ■tttt ■■t■t■t■■ttEltttlt■.� ■t��-,■ _ ♦ I11� � �■tttt ■tt■t■■t■tt■ttt�It1 � � ■ k■i sIt1I1111� C ��IIIII �i ii ii ■■■■1■ i i poll111 ■jai • w �. \III III_ 11111 �• •• ••_ _ 1���, .. .. Fill IH, .. .... 11 III ..�� IIISO - l111I111 ..a fill .. .. • �IIIIII �= == ..= :C�. MEN �nn� ti�11I1I �•.•• •� ■1111/ � - 11111�� --- _ IIIIIII : ■Itiitt�� 111111'!Illl _ — ' ■tt■III�� Ills 1::_Jill �v DM 28 No Land Use Changes .I. r• CD\YC\ rl M !CC H S]S !• !\!\\\Y\Y T ul '� cr` 4 +c, 7 PACIFIC OCEAN dP'o<v`✓ w DM 29 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PI:A.NNING:COMMISSION NO GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to bexousidered by DESIGNATION DESIGNATION City.6"cil 53. OS-C RL-6.5(Residential Low LUD-CZ-FP2(Limited Use Open Space Conservation(OS=C) (Open Space- Density,6.5 un/ac) District,Coastal Zone, Conservation Flood lain u CF Qc u,t^ air o� ��ti DM 30 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN COMMITTEE (Designation to be considered`6y DESIGNATION DESIGNATION CityCouncil 37. CG(Commercial MV F10-D (Mixed Use RM(Residential Medium Mixed Use Vertical,decrease General)RM Vertical,Density 1.5 FAR Density) density from 25 to 15 du/ac . (Residential (MUJ,1.5 FAR[CJ,25 Medium Density du/ac,Design Overlay 41. CG(Commercial RH-30(Residential CG(Commercial General) .Commercial General-'FAR.35 General) High Density,30 un/ac CG-Fl .. 42. RM (Residential P(Public)-designation to CG(Commercial General) Public(P) Medium Densit reflect hospital 92. RM(Residential P(RM-15)Public- RM(Residential Medium Residential Medium Density 15 Medium Density) underlying Residential Density) 00he and add Specific Plan(SP) Medium Density 15 du/ac _ designation: = CITY OE F NTAIh VALLEY �� a J AMSTERDAM > z VI -i ID - REMBRANOT z � 7 c MERSEILLE OR LMMLOERCR= VpLENCIp L.CASU AVE FM FgIESLANO OR- LA AA.. A< /) z y J 1 i U EES�. M GUILDERS DP i CF_E o — A RR ND ILA.= z w SLA R -\ AVE I [i•+o LVE- OPAL'CR I O J I.1_i - i J _ Z hJ MIN Dwt a �K Z V p[L LAOD F ER _ I `j L RROYO U4 ;EL AA.pp K I 1 1 O N WM N AVE II E N �t[EI m -- � � L•iaSD'. � I roEAESH z Z r......; Z o TALBERT AVE ENISTING GENERALPLAN EXISTINZONING t COMMISSION 1GENERALPLAN ADVISORY1 1 1 DESIGNATION 1MMITTEE (Designation I beconsidered by City DESIGNATION 1 (IndustrialIG (Residential (Industrial1ResidentialLow Density 7.0 dulac General) 1 Density, 1 IG(Industrial : (Industrial, 1 (IndustrialLimited) addHistoricOverlay General) Density Historical1 ICommercial1 ' (Office Professional) ( 1 1 General1 11 Density) CG® 1(Commercial ; :' 11 1 'll CG(Commercial 1 I 11 eral) IIIIIIIIIII , ■ 11111 I:�IIUI U12�� WHE 11_ W 1111111■ 0■nd in �IIIIIIIIIIQ>� � � �: �����■ C� ■ �. �� �a �► u�l tat/ mongolism?Ron Emw ro Sol ��- �!����� Illllull�llll■■� Ul11■ 1 111• IY/t. t111111111111l11 =_ lYIIII 1111111111111111 •1111 1111111111111111 tlllllll ••t:.L• Illlllllllu• 1111111111111- 1111111111111 I_'_Inuunuu� �� , IIIIIIIIIItII- .■ C IIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII D -��1111111111111 'lllllllllllll 11,11,;1 t111111111111 onnnnul�•r.'��=���� �7 �� ..Ittllllltlllt a �•- --� IIIIIIIU1111-" - nuunum - `„�IIIIIIIIIIIII�r� .1-�iiiiiiiiiiiii�������= I■1 ■. DM 32 No Land Use Changes WARNER AVE. RW. I M ;cj \\S CF CF-r-7 I fill 1111Q11 : 11i' ll , CF-E 50�OMA Do d L-J\ I T-1 m'. —73'1 AL 9 L > --r-1= _ i k 77 1711,Fl-i7-1 I T71 1-7-7— Di TT�s --------- DR DR 5�.A.ER T CF-E CF- CF-E -7 L CR I i L I I I I I I I I CF-R "" ro.jr( I I I I I RD Ii1©1��/��1� �!►jIII id - . �i11 . 11loi1l.�a��i •• �,���►������� - ..... ..•.. ..... ■ III •���� �� N ■ice �� �. ME low ..no UNION I � �� _: !f� �� Imo. . . � • ��♦ no MM - .o .o .. no no20 Sol m ♦�� � .. .o �� �. m no m Pill - !!!1!!!1/��♦ ♦� ♦� �� Ml10 - _ lIIIIIIu1111111� �� ♦ � - .. .. - .. .. .. will /!l1111� /1 1111�111\� mail � 1111111111�1■ es - es 1 . 1 i . l i i 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DM 34 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION' NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIOI�IS PLAN (Designation to be considered by :. DESIGNATION Cit :CouncilY 76. RM(Residential RL-6.5 (Residential Low RI-CZ(Residential Residential Low Density.7.0 du/ac Medium Density) Density 6.5 du/ac) Low Density,Coastal Zone 77. Mixed Use RM-15,CR-F1-SP Huntington Harbour Mixed Use and add Specific Plan (Residential Medium Density 15 Bay Club Specific (SP)designation du/ac,Commercial Regional, Plan Density 0.35 FAR Specific Plan WARNER AVE +L to= ST I 4. y EUGEwATER Uib ar.ls a i ` % CF-R rrm WEATMERLT SAY C. I . A PM CF-R = - _ O WARNER 1 ' AVE. ,5 t..° ��.. �. ,�.,,. AVE I 1 G " o /�• f 9sr I ,p 4 9C"'ci O OC, 2 i DM 35 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING PLANNING.COMIVIISSION NO GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION COMMITTEE (Designation fo.be considered by DESIGNATION City`Council) 18. RM(Residential OS Park(Open Space, OS-PR(Open Space,Parks Open Space-Park(OS-P) Medium.Density) Park) and Recreation 75. OS-R CV-Fl (Commercial CF-C _CZ Open Space Recreation;and add (Open Space- Visitor,Density 0.35 FAR) (Community Facilities,Civic Public& designation Recreation) Uses,Coastal Zone 76. RM(Residential RL-6.5(Residential Low Rl-CZ(Residential Low Residential LowDensity 7.0 du/ac Medium Density) Density 6.5 du/ac) Density,Coastal Zone .• J n : w to \ o $ L. 9 bn/C __� N dl SEG DM BEACH WARNER - AVE. c 0C" ^' 9y �'� DM 36 No Land Use Changes fo r lr�Jr CAII I l� I I \O '4 t I q 4 A i O c 09 S� , c q I C� �s s . DM 37 No Land Use Changes IF(5 o° c,r rl ,o iA �r EXISTING GENERALPLAN EXISTINGZONING 1 1 1GENERALPLAN ADVISORY1 1 1 DESIGNATION 1 (Designation i be considered DESIGNATION i ® Goldeni (ResidentialHolly i i and du/ac and Open El Low Density 6.5 du/ac) (Residential Low Density,4 Open Space-Park designations il-space-Recreation El and Open Space-Park un/ac&Open Space) in ISO m mm as m MINI► �i �i��i ����� ���i• ��i� •tit �``O��•;�►�:�.���� ■ uumiml � � IIIIIIIIIIII �. ����` .ulullnul uamum . .,uuuuuu_Iluuuuu uulllulll:uuuuun ■ I A 51f,iiiiiii n —'—� IIIII1111111 �Ilplllllll� IIIIIIIIIIII ,m_ r - �Illlllllllll �� . \ � IIIIIIIIIIIII � � Illllllllllli -_ � � --IIIIIIIIIIIII � � �IIIIIIIIIII 1 � w ov DM 39 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS PLAN (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION Citv Council 16. Mixed MH-F3-30 -SP(Mixed Use Pacifica Community. Mixed Use and add Specific Plan Development Horizontal,Density 1.0 FAR,30 Plan (SP) un/ac,Specific Plan 71. Mixed P (MH-F3-30-SP)Public- Pacifica Community Mixed Use, add Specific Plan (SP) Development underlying Mixed Use Horizontal, Plan Density 1.0 FAR,30 un/ac, Specific Plan 72. Mixed CG-F2-D (Commercial CO (Commercial Mixed Use Horizontal,decrease Development General,Density 0.5 FAR,Design Office) density from 25 to 15 du/ac Overlay 4. C ! + CF-R . I OrT•■q W CF-R ��—1, CF-C i = I El I t+•T -v'OuEeEC M I I sc=-c �.,I.t-E +WO— i� l I i ■ 1 ..E `A + ,. -4,77 - r 1 . R• .F R IIIIII �e�;",- _:-s •,.•-,cam 0 = I g aura, z _ _ M F X I V GAR FIELD Av E. r r ■ �,� •�•��•��•� ���■■■r �111111111■Id ���—���t11111r ��i������ �1■■■ �■■ _ �� �� fill I►�I�111t1111111!■ "� ►�t/1dd111111► �11111d IIIf1IO�l /li/►� �/1d1111111 . ..�� 1■1■■1■11■ut�lt It R�ii '�= !il l�i� ��� mW, IVPLO �'►'��Id IIII ������ �` n '`Iu�inr %� �`� �� �� i►� �� IIII\ R ■■■■■■■■■■■■1■■■ ■11d1 IIII , 1 p �� �''i�i� C.����►� i� 1■1■Id1 11 �■ '1MEN/i►�Hr �_�•�IIIIIIIIIC �� ■■� �■■-��.=�• - I.II ICI t.�. �■ � /rd■■ �� �� �� �;.. �� � - fi■fit■■titl■ i ■■■■■■■dl■1■1■■d■ �� ►, iiiii 'pp 1��� :: ■Ir�� ■■ 111��1 ail 1 111111�, � ��p :: ■Ir��:_ 111111 111111�� ■ . IIII■ �� C �1�� ��� 111111. DM 40 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. GENERAL COMMITTEE DESIGNATION ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS ' PLAN (Designation to be considered by DESIGNATION City Council 17. RM(Residential P(RMH-25)Public-underlying RMH Public(P)designation,increase Medium Density) Residential Medium High Density 25 (Residential density from 15 to 25 du/ac un/ac Medium High Density) 73. RL(Residential P(RL-6.5)Public-underlying RL(Residential Residential Low Density 7.0 Low Density) - Residential Low Density 6.5 du/ac Low Density) du/ac,add Public 74. RM(Residential P(RMH-25)Public-underlying RMH Residential Medium Density 15 Medium Density) Residential Medium High Density 25 (Residential du/ac and add Public(P) du/ac Medium High Density) 95. RL(Residential Western half-CG-F1 (Commercial PS(Public Public(P)designation; retain Low Density) General,Density 0.35 FAR), Semi Public) maximum 7.0 du/ac Residential Eastern half-RL-6.5 (Residential Low Low Density designation Density 6.5 du/ac Planning Commission Land Use Recommendations Approved December 12, 1995 Staff Analysis & Recommendations EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 1 Southwest RL CN- Fl CG- FP2 Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Banning Ave.& Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential Bushard St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing General Plan to Commercial FAR) zoning and existing Neighborhood(CN-Fl) (DM 22) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5-0) 2. South side of RH P(RH-30) RH Add Public (P) Agree with GPAC; no Disagree with Staff and` Hamilton Ave. (Residential Public- (Residential designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend 300'west of High underlying High Density) identify Residential High Density change from Residential Brookhurst St. Density) Residential church/school (RH)land use designation. High to Residential Low High Density with Public (P) (DM 20) 30 un/ac designation; decrease in density from 30 to 7 du/ac,P(RL-7) NOTE: inconsistent with zoning (Straw Vote 5-0) 3. Northwest RL CN- Fl CG Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Atlanta Ave. & Low Density Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential Newland St. Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan to Commercial FAR) zoning and existing Neighborhood (CN-Fl) (DM 13) conditions designation(Straw Vote 5-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING :, GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS 11:DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 4. Atlanta Ave. east RL P(RL-6.5) RL Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and of Leasure Ln. (Residential Public- (Residential designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend Low underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density change to add Public(P) (DM 14) Density) Low Density church/school (RL) land use designation, designation; retain Residential, retain maximum 7.0 un/ac maximum 7.0 du/ac(Straw 6.5 un/ac Vote 5-0 5. Northwest Recreation '' P(Public) RA- RL Public'designation' Agree with GPAC; new Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential for a Utility right designation for utility right GPAC: recommend Public Magnolia St. & Agriculture, of way of way (P) designation to identify Hamilton Ave. Residential utility right of way(Straw' Low Density) Vote'5-0) M 14 6. Southwest RL CN- F1 CG - FP2 Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend change Indianapolis Ave Low Neighborhood, General, Commercial to between Zoning and to Commercial & Newland St. Density) Density 0.35 Floodplain) reflect existing General Plan Neighborhood (CN-Fl) FAR) zoning and existing designation(Straw Vote 6- (DM 13) conditions 1) C-#sage-frerrt ,,, Deleted; change to General. of Bushard . & (Commereial (CommeFeiai Residential-to provides eensisteney Plan designation has been Gar-field " '� Lew" Neighborhood; General, Commerdal-to between Zoning and previously approved Density) Density 0.35 Fleedplein) .e fle, sting Genern'Plan (Dh4 ) FAR) gand emist+ng eonditions 8. Northwest RL CN - F1 Q- CG- FP2 Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential (Commercial (Qualified, Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend change Bushard St. & Low Neighborhood, Commercial Commercial to between Zoning and from Residential to Litchfield Dr. Density) Density 0.35 General, reflect existing General Plan Commercial Neighborhood FAR) Floodplain) zoning and existing (CN-Fl) designation (DM 6) conditions (Straw Vote 5-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 2 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING' GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 9. Southwest RM OS P (Open OS- PR-FP2 Change Residential Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and cornea of (Residential Space-Park) (Open Space, to Open Space Park provides consistency GPAC: recommend Delaware St. & Medium Parks and to reflect existing between Zoning and change from Residential to "Detroit Ave. Density) Recreation, park General Plan Open Space-Park(OS-P) Floodplain) designation (Straw Vote 5- (DM 12) 0) W. Pae*fie Ceast R14 MV F8 SP DTI SP# 1 Change Agree withr� Deleted; change to General Highway (Residential (Mixed-I Use (Downtown resedenfi Modefied to eenform to Plan designation has been frontage High Vdear Speed•+¢-Plan; e9mmer-einh previously approved between Density) Density-1.5 Distr:et#r Downtown Speeifie Plan 6th St. &-8th St. FAR-1MUI- Visitor Serving (approved April 17, 1995) 0.35 FAD ! Commer-eial) (DM 12) 25 dulae, Speeifie Plan) 11. Southwest RM CN- F1 - D CG Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend Alabama St. & Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and change from Residential to Adams Ave. Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan Commercial Neighborhood FAR, Design zoning and existing (CN-F1-D) designation (DM 12) Overlay) conditions (Straw Vote 5-0) 12. Northeast corner RM OS- P(Open RM-0 Change Residential Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and of Huntington (Residential Space- Park) (Residential to Open Space Park change to reflect existing GPAC: recommend St. &Wichita Medium Medium to reflect existing conditions,may require change from Residential to Ave. Density) Density, Oil park(Boys and future zone change Open Space-Park(OS-P) Overlay) Girls Club) designation(Straw Vote 5- (DM 2) 0) NOTE: inconsistent with zoning Approved as of December 12, 1995 3 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN... .` COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 13. Southwest RM P(RM-15) RM Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and GPAC: corner of Clay ;:; (Residential' Public- (Residential designation to change to existing recommend changeto.add Ave. & Delaware Medium underlying Medium identify Residential Medium Public(P) designation St. Density) Residential Density) church/school Density(RM)land use (Straw Vote 5-0) Medium designation (DM 2) Density 15 un/ac 14. Northeast corner RM P(RM- 15) RM Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and GPAC: of Clay Ave. & (Residential Public- (Residential designation to change to existing recommend change to add Delaware St. Medium underlying Medium identify Medium Density Public(P)designation Density) Residential Density) church/school Residential (RM)land (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 2) Medium use designation Density 15 un/ac 15. South side of IG (Industrial P(I) Public- IL (Industrial Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and GPAC: Garfield Ave., General) underlying Limited) designation to change to existing recommend change to add Gothard St.& Industrial identify City's Industrial (I)land use Public(P)designation Huntington St. Water Yard designation (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 2) 16. Southwest Mixed MH - F3-30- Pacifica Modify existing Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: corner of Main Development SP(Mixed Community. Mixed Use change to Mixed Use recommend change to Mixed St. & Florida St. Use Plan designation to designation and add Use and add Specific Plan (East of Florida) Horizontal, reflect existing use Specific Plan (SP) designation (Straw Density 1.0 and conditions Vote 6-0-1 abstain) (DM 39) FAR,30 un/ac, Specific Plan) Approved as of December 12, 1995 4 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 17. Southwest RM P(RMH-25) RMH Add Public (P) Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of Ellis (Residential Public- (Residential designation to increase in density from GPAC: recommend to add Ave. & Chapel Medium underlying Medium High identify 15 to 25 du/ac, provides Public(P) designation, Ln. Density) Residential Density) church/school, consistency between increase density from 15 to Medium High increase density Zoning and General Plan 25 du/ac (Straw Vote 5-0) (DM 40) Density 25 from 15 to 25 du/ac un/ac 18. Park site; north RM OS Park OS-PR(Open Change Residential Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and of Pacific Coast (Residential (Open Space, Space, Parks to Open Space Park provides consistency GPAC: recommend change Highway& Medium Park) and to reflect existing between Zoning and from Residential to Open Warner Ave. Density) Recreation) park General Plan Space-Park(OS-P) designation(Straw Vote 5 (DM 35) p) 19. Northeast of RL RM- 15 RMP Land use change to Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and Heil Ave. & (Residential (Residential (Residential reflect existing reflects existing GPAC: recommend retain Saybrook Ln. Low Density) Medium Manufactured density of Mobile conditions existing Residential Low Density 15 Home Park) Home Park, Density 7.0 du/ac (Straw (DM 23) un/ac) increase density Vote 5-0), Staff to explore from 7 to 15 du/ac adding a Mobile Home Overlay 20. 300'Northwest RL P(RL-6.5) RL Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and of Heil Ave.& (Residential Public- (Residential designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend change Springdale St. Low Density) underlying Low Density) identify Residential Low Density to add Public(P) Residential church/school (RL)land use designation; retain (DM 24) Low Density designation,'retain' maximum 7.0 du/ac(Straw 6.5 un/ac) maximum 7.0 un/ac Vote 5-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 5 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL' ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN : COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION. DESIGNATION . 21. 300' Southwest SR(Senior RMH-25 (Q) RMH Eliminates Senior Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and of Edinger Ave. Residential) (Residential (Qualified, Residential provides consistency GPAC: recommend change & Springdale St. Medium High Residential Designation, RMH between Zoning and from Senior Residential to Density 25 Medium High allows senior General Plan Residential Medium High (DM 24) un/ac) Density) residential (RMH-25) designation development (Straw Vote 5-0) 22. Northeast of CG P(CN-FI) CG Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and McFadden Ave. (Commercial Public- (Commercial designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend change &Edwards St. General) underlying General) identify Commercial land use to add Public(P) Commercial church/school designation designation(Straw Vote 5- (DM 17) Neighborhoo 0) d,Density 0.35 FAR) 23. Shell/Cal Industrial- MH- F1 -30 M2- 01 - CZ; Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and GPAC Resources site, Resource -SP (Mixed R4- 0- CZ; Industrial to Mixed expands the visitor recommend change from Pacific Coast Production Use Cl. - O CZ Use serving commercial Industrial-Resource Highway Horizontal, (Industrial opportunities along the Production to Mixed-Use between Density 0.35 General, Oil coast, allows residential Horizontal; recommend F2- Seapoint Ave. & FAR,30 Overlay, development,promotes 30(.5 FAR,30 dudac); Golden West St. un/ac, Coastal Zone; activity center to link the recommend"average" Specific Plan) Residential Downtown and density of 15 du/ac(Straw (DM 3,4 & 10) High Density, Waterfront,may require Vote 7-0) Oil Overlay, future zone change Coastal Zone; Commercial Neighborhood, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone) Approved as of December 12, 1995 6 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 24. 1,500' Southwest IG (Industrial RM- 15 1G (Industrial Change from Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and of Warner Ave. General) (Residential General) Industrial to change to reflect existing, GPAC: recommend change & Gothard St. Medium Residential to conditions,may require from Industrial to (Mobile Home Density, 15 reflect existing future zone change Residential Low Density Park) un/ac) conditions (Mobile 7.0 du/ac,NOTE: Home Park) inconsistent with Zoning (DM 31) (Straw Vote 4-1) 25. Southeast corner IG (Industrial I - F2 - H IL (Industrial Add Historic(H) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and of Gothard St. & General) (Industrial, Limited) Overlay to area to change to Industrial(I) GPAC: recommend to add Warner Ave. Density 0.5 identify Historic land use designation Historic Overlay(Straw FAR, structures (Slater Vote 5-0) (DM 31) Historical House,etc.) Overlay) 26. 50' Northwest of RL P(RL'-6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and Edinger Ave. & (Residential Public- Low Density) designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend change Golden West St. Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density to add Public (P) Residential church/school (RL)land use designation; retain (DM 17) Low Density designation,retain maximum 7.0 du/ac(Straw 6.5 un/ac maximum 7.0 un/ac Vote 5-0) 27. 500' Northwest RL P(RL -6.5) RL (Residential Add Public (P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and of Edinger Ave. (Residential Public- Low Density) designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend change & Golden West Low Density) underlying identify Residential Low Density to add Public(P) St. Residential church/school (RL) land use designation; retain Low Density designation, retain maximum 7.0 du/ac(Straw DM 17) 6.5 un/ac maximum 7.0 un/ac Vote 5-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 7 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING > GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 28. Northwest RM CN- F1 CG Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential to provides consistency GPAC: recommend change McFadden Ave. Medium Neighborhood, General) Commercial to between Zoning and from Residential Medium & Golden West Density) Density 0.35 reflect existing General Plan Density to Commercial St. FAR) zoning and Neighborhood (CN-FI) (DM 17) conditions designation (Straw Vote 5- 0 29. > P,Q- P,I P(CG - FI) PS(Public Change from Agree with GPAC;'' Agree with Staff and Northeast corner, (Public, Public- Semi Public) Public,Quasi expands commercial GPAC: recommend change of Golden West ' Quasi- underlying Public, opportunities along from Public,Quasi-Public, St. & Edinger::: Public, Commercial Institutional to Edinger Corridor. Institutional to Commercial Ave. (Edinger Institutional) General, Public with General(CG-F1) and add frontage) Density 0.35 underlying Public(P) designation FAR) Commercial (Straw Vote 5-0) NOTE: (DM 15) General inconsistent with zoning designation at Golden West College 30. Southeast of CG CR- F2- D CG Upgrades existing Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and Golden West St. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands regional GPAC: recommend change & Edinger Ave. General) Regional, General) designation to commercial opportunities from Commercial General Density 0.5 Regional with freeway access to Commercial Regional (DM 26) FAR, Design Commercial (CR-F2-D)designation Overlay) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) 31. South side of CG CR- F2- D CG Upgrades existing Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and Edinger Ave. (Commercial (Commercial (Commercial Commercial expands commercial GPAC: recommend change. from Gothard General) Regional, General) designation to opportunities with from Commercial General St.to Parkside Density 0.5 Regional freeway access to Commercial Regional Ln. FAR, Design Commercial (CR-F2-D)designation (DM 26) Overlay) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 8 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESiCNATION 32. Northeast of CG CR- F2- D CG (Commercial Upgrades existing Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and Gothard St. & (Commercial (Commercial General) Commercial expands commercial GPAC: recommend change Edinger Ave General) Regional, designation to opportunities with from Commercial General Density 0.5 Regional freeway access to Commercial Regional (DM 15). FAR, Design Commercial (CR-F2-D) designation Overlay) designation (Straw Vote 5-0) 33. Southeast of P, Q-P,P M V- F8-D RL (Residential Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and McFadden Ave. (Public, (Mixed Use Low Density), Public, Quasi- promotes an activity GPAC: recommend change & Gothard St. Quasi Vertical, IG(General Public, center by adding from Public,Quasi-Public, Public, Density 1.5 Industrial), CG- Institutional and commercial/residential Institutional and Mixed (DM 15) Institutional) FAR [MU], H(Commercial Mixed Use to designation near a transit`' Development to Mixed Use MD(Mixed 0.35 FAR [C], General-High Mixed Use center Vertical(MV-F8-D) Development 25 un/ac) Rise Overlay) Vertical designation(Straw Vote 7- (Commercial/Resid 0) ential) at the Transit Center' Area 34. Huntington CG MV- F9-SP CG (Commercial Modifies Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and Center (Commercial (Mixed Use General) Commercial expands development and GPAC: recommend change General) Vertical, designation by revitalization from Commercial General (DM 15) Density 1.5 adding Mixed Use opportunities for the to Commercial Regional- FAR [MU], (Commercial/Resid Mall, continues to FAR.5- Specific Plan(CR 0.5 FAR [C], ential); Continues promote the regional - F2-SP)) designation 25 un/ac) Regional importance of the site but (Straw Vote 5-1) Commercial uses, may(not required) also may permit allow residential residential development to increase development activities in the area Approved as of December 12, 1995 9 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 35. Aldrich Ave. CG MV- F10- D CG- RMH- Modifies existing Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and south to Heil (Commercial A(Mixed RM Commercial allows continued GPAC:'recommend change Ave.west side of General) Use Vertical, (Commercial designation by Commercial uses and from Commercial General Beach Blvd. RMH Density 1.5 General; adding Mixed Use development,permits to Mixed Use Vertical,' (Residential FAR [MU], Residential (Commercial/Resid (not required) residential, decrease density from 25 to (DM 26) Medium 1.5 FAR [C], Medium High ential);`continues uses and provides 15 du/ac(Straw''Vote 6-0) High 25 du/ac, Density; commercial uses, possible relocation of NOTE:inconsistent with Density) RM Design Residential may permit Auto'Dealers to fortn zoning (Residential Overlay, Medium residential future Auto Mall Medium Auto Density) development,'does Density) Overlay) increase some density from 15 to 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers 36. Heil Ave. south CG MV-F10- D CG- RM Modifies existing Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and to Warner Ave. (Commercial -A (Mixed (Commercial Commercial allows continued GPAC: recommend change east&west sides General) Use Vertical, General; designation by Commercial uses and from Commercial General of Beach Blvd. RM Density 1.5 Residential adding Mixed Use development,permits to Mixed Use Vertical, (Residential FAR [MU], Medium (Commercial/Resid (not required) residential decrease density from 25 to (DM 26&27) Medium 1.5 FAR [C], Density) ential); continues uses and provides 15 du/ac(Straw Vote 5-1) Density) 25 du/ac, commercial uses, possible relocation of NOTE: inconsistent with Design may permit Auto Dealers to form zoning Overlay, residential future Auto Mall Auto development,does Overlay) increase some density from 15 to 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers Approved as of December 12, 1995 10 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL' ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 37. Southeast of CG MV- F10- D RM Modifies existing Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and Beach Blvd. & (Commercial (Mixed Use (Residential Commercial allows continued GPAC: recommend change' Warner Ave. General) Vertical, Medium designation by Commercial uses and from Commercial General RM Density 1.5 Density) adding Mixed Use development,permits to Mixed Use Vertical, .(DM 30) (Residential FAR [MU], (Commercial/Reside (not required) residential decrease density from 25 to Medium 1.5 FAR [C], ntial); continues uses and provides 15 du/ac(Straw Vote 5-1) Density) 25 du/ac, commercial uses, possible relocation of NOTE:'inconsistent with Design may permit Auto Dealers to form zoning Overlay) residential future Auto Mall development, does increase some density from 15 to 25 du/ac,Auto Overlay allows possible location of Auto Dealers 38. Northeast of RH P(RMH-25) RMH Add Public (P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and Nichols St. & (Residential Public- (Residential designation to change to existing Multi- GPAC: recommend change Warner Ave. High underlying Medium High identify Family Residential land from Residential High to Density) Residential Density) church/school; does use designation,but does Residential Medium High (DM 26) Medium High reduce density from reduce the density Density and add Public (P) Density,25 35 to 25 du/ac designation, does decrease un/ac) density from 35 to 25 du/ac (Straw Vote 6-0) 39.' 200' Northwest Mixed Use RMH - 25 Q- RMH Change from Mixed Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and of Magnolia Aver (Residential' (Qualified, Use to Residential provides consistency GPAC:'recommend change &Warner Ave. Medium High Residential Medium High between Zoning and from Mixed Use to Density,25 Medium High Density to reflect General Plan Residential Medium High (DM 27) un/ac) Density) existing zoning and Density 25 du/ac(Straw conditions Vote 6-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 11 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL' ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 40. Southeast corner Commercial RM'- 15 OP(Office Change from Office Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and of Warner Ave. General (Residential Professional) Professional to compatible with GPAC: recommend change and Oak Ln. Medium Residential Medium surrounding land use to Commercial General- Density) Density designation FAR.35(CG -F1) (DM 31) designation (Straw Vote 6- ' 0) 41. East& west CG RH-30 CG Change from Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and sides of Beach (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General promotes commercial GPAC: recommend change Blvd., Blaylock General) High Density, General) to Residential High revitalization by forming to Commercial General- Dr. south to 30 un/ac) Density to form nodes of residential FAR.35 (CG- Fl) Ronald Dr. residential node, development ,breaks designation (Straw Vote 5- breaks continuous continuous strip 0-1 absent) (DM 30&31) strip commercial commercial development development by clustering commercial activity at intersections 42. '' Southeast of RM P(Public) CG Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and Beach Blvd. & (Residential designation to (Commercial designation to identifies existing hospital GPAC: recommend change Newman Ave. Medium reflect General) identify hospital; use from Residential Medium Density) hospital removes Residential Density to Pubic (P) (DM 30) Medium Density(15 designation (Straw Vote 6- '' du/ac)designation 0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 12 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE 7.0NING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 43. East side of RM RMH- 25 RM- RMH Change from Disagree with GPAC; Do Agree with Staff: Florida St., 17th (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium not create node and recommend retain existing St.to Yorktown Medium Medium High Medium to Residential increase density, retain Residential Medium Ave. Density) Density, 25 Density; Medium High existing Residential Density 15 dn/ac un/ac) Residential Density to reflect Medium Density designation(Straw Vote 6- (DM 2) Medium High existing conditions 0) NOTE: portion of site Density) and create node, (RMH)inconsistent with does increase density zoning from 15 to 25 du/ac in some areas 44. 800' South of RM RH-30 RM - RMH Change from Disagree with GPAC; Do Agree with Staff: Garfield Ave. on (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium not create node and recommend retain existing east side of Medium High Density, Medium to Residential High increase density, retain Residential Medium Florida St.to Density) 30 un/ac) Density; Density to reflect existing.Residential Density 15 du/ac Yorktown Ave. Residential existing conditions Medium Density designation(Straw Vote 6- Medium High and create node, 0) NOTE: portion of site (DM 2) Density) does increase density (RMH)inconsistent with from 15 to 30 dn/ac zoning in some areas 45. 300' Southwest RM CG - F1 RM Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and of Yorktown (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium reflects existing GPAC: recommend change Ave. & Beach Medium General, Medium to Commercial conditions and uses from Residential Medium Blvd. Density) Density 0.35 Density) General to reflect Density to Commercial FAR) existing conditions General (CG-Fl) (DM 2) designation (Straw Vote 6- 0) NOTE: inconsistent with zoning Approved as of December 12, 1995 13 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 46. East of Florida RM RH-30 RM Change from Disagree with GPAC; Do Agree with Staff: St.,300' south of (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium not create node and recommend retain existing Yorktown Ave. Medium High Density, Medium to Residential High increase density, retain Residential Medium Density to Adams Ave. Density) 30 un/ac) Density) Density to reflect existing Residential 15 du/ac designation (Straw existing conditions Medium Density Vote 6-0) (DM 2) and create node, does increase density from 15 to 30 du/ac in some areas 47. 100' Northeast RM P(RH-30) RM Add Public(P) Modify GPAC Agree with Staff: of Utica Ave. & (Residential Public- (Residential designation to recommendation;Add recommend retain existing Florida St. Medium underlying Medium' identify Public(P) designation to Residential Medium Density Density) Residential Density) Church/School; identify school or church, 15 du/ac and add Public(P) (DM 2) High Density, does increase but do not increase designation(Straw Vote 6- 30 un/ac) density from 15 to density, retain existing 0) 30 du/ac Residential Medium Density.(15 du/ac) 48. East of Florida RM P(RH-30) RM Add Public (P) Modify GPAC Agree with Staff: St.300' south of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to recommendation; Add recommend retain existing Utica Ave. Medium underlying Medium identify Public (P) designation to Residential Medium Density Density) Residential Density) Church/School; identify school or church, 15 du/ac and add Public(P) (DM 2) High Density, does increase but do not increase designation (Straw Vote 6- 30 un/ac) density from 15 to density, retain existing 0) 30 du/ac Residential Medium Density(15 du/ac) Approved as of December 12, 1995 14 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL `ADVISORY. EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LLOCATION PLAN' COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 49. 100' Northeast RM P(RH -30) RM Add Public (P) Modify GPAC Agree with Staff: of Adams Ave. (Residential Public - (Residential designation to recommendation; Add recommend retain existing & Yorktown Medium underlying Medium identify Public (P) designation to Residential Medium Ave. Density) Residential Density) Church/School; does identify school or church, Density 15 du/ac and add High Density, increase density but do not increase Public(P) designation (DM 2) 30 un/ac) from 15 to 30 du/ac density, retain existing (Straw Vote 6-0) Residential Medium Density (15 du/ac) 50. South side of RM CN- F1 RM - FP2 Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Hamilton Ave. (Residential (Commercial (Residential Residential Medium expands the commercial recommend retain existing 400' east of Medium Neighborhoo Medium Density to portion of the site that is Residential Medium Bushard St. Density) d, Density Density, Commercial currently residential, Density (RM-15) 0.35 FAR) Floodplain) Neighborhood however, existing designations to identify the (DM 20) residential becomes non- existing residential conforming; retain designation; no change to existing designation to the commercial to the west reflect existing conditions (Straw Vote 6-0) 51. Northeast corner CG RM- 15 CG - FP2 Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: of Hamilton Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General existing commercial recommend retain existing. & Brookhurst General) Medium General, to Residential would become non- Commercial General (CG- Street. Density, 15 Floodplain) Medium Density conforming, designation Fl) designation (Straw un/ac) should reflect existing Vote 6-0) (DM 19) conditions and uses, retain existing Commercial General designation PC approved December 12, 1995 15 (g\gp EXISTING, GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. IACACION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 52. Northwest RL CN- F1 CG Change from Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Low provides consistency GPAC; recommend retain Indianapolis Low Neighborhoo General) Density to between Zoning and existing Residential Low Ave. & Bushard Density) d,FAR 0.35) Commercial General Plan Density 7.0 du/ac, requested St. Neighborhood Historic Report to add Historic Overlay,NOTE; (DM 7) inconsistent with Zoning Straw Vote 5-0 53. ' Northwest OS-C RL -6.5 LUD-CZ- Change from Open Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: corner of Pacific (Open Space (Residential FP2 (Limited Space Conservation retain existing Open recommend retain Open Coast Highway - Low Density, Use District, to Residential Low Space Conservation land Space Conservation(OS-C) & Brookhurst Conservatio 6.5 un/ac) Coastal Zone, Density in a portion use designation designation(Straw Vote 4- St. (White Hole n) Floodplain) of the White Hole 1) area) Area DM 22&29 54. Southwest RM RL-6.5/RH - Magnolia Modify designations Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff. corner of (Residential 30 Pacific to reflect existing modify designation and recommend retain existing Magnolia St. & Medium (Residential Specific Plan and approved land map to reflect specific Residential Medium Density Hamilton Ave. Density) Low Density, use map designations plan designation 15 du/ac designation and NESI (Aston) 6.5 un/ac, to conform to add Specific Plan(Straw site Residential specific plan(MDR- Vote 6-0) High Density, 15) DM 14 30 un/ac 55. 100' North of RL RM- 15 RMP Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Yorktown Ave., (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Low to retain existing Residential recommend retain existing west side of Low Medium Manufactured Residential Medium. Low Density land use Residential Low Density 7.0 Brookhurst St. Density) Density, 15 Home Park) Density,increase in designation du/ac designation and add un/ac) density from 7 to 15 Mobile Home'Overlay (DM 6) un/ac to reflect (Straw Vote 6-0) existing density of Mobile Home Park Approved as of December 12, 1995 16 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 56. 1000' South of CG RM - 15 CG Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Garfield Ave., (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General retain existing recommend retain existing west side of General) Medium General) to Residential Commercial General land Commercial General (CG- Brookhurst St. Density, 15 Medium Density use designation Fl) designation(Straw un/ac) Vote 6-0) (DM 6) 57 1,000 feet south CG '' RH-30 RH Change from Disagree with GPAC; do Agree with Staff: of Atlanta Ave. (Commercial (Residential (Residential Commercial General not increase density to recommend to designate east side of General) High Density, High Density) and Residential reflect density bonus, entire site Residential Beach Blvd., 30 un/ac) Medium to designate entire site Medium Density 15 du/ac (Breakers RM RH Residential High Medium Density (Straw Vote 6-0) Development) (Residential RH-30 (Residential Density,'density Residential''to reflect Medium (Residential High Density) increase from 15 to existing conditions (DM 14) Density) High Density, 30 du/ac 30 un/ac) 58. Northwest and CG RMH -25 CG Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: southwest of (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General retain existing recommend retain existing Joliet Ave. & General) Medium High General) to Residential commercial land use Commercial General (CG- Beach Blvd. Density, 25 Medium High Density designation Fl) designation (Straw un/ac) Vote 6-0) (DM 12) 59- Northwest RM D( Mu 95) RM Add blie(P) i1:........e...with GRA C; Deleted; change to General eer-nee-ef fR�es eetisl Publie- (Residential �refleet sehool has been removed Plan designation has been Dille-Ave: Medium underlying Medium sehool/e#ur-eh; and site develepeE#, previously approved &Beac-h-RWd: Density) Residential Density) inerease-in-density (Greystene) at Medium from 15 to 25 dulae Residential Medium (DM 12) Density 25 Density 15 urdae, ret dulae existing land-use designatienr Approved as of December 12, 1995 17 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 60. Southeast corner Planned CG - F1 CG Change from Planned Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: of Adams Ave. Community (Commercial (Commercial Community to retain existing Planned recommend to designate as & Beach Blvd. General, General) Commercial General Community land use Mixed Use and add Specific (Seabridge Density 0.35 designation Plan(Straw Vote 6-0) Specific Plan FAR) area) (DM 13) 61. South of Orange RM P(CN- 1) RMH-A Add Public (P) Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Ave.between (Residential Public (Residential designation to reflect Add Public(P) recommend retain 10th St. & 11th Medium underlying Medium High school/church change designation to Residential' Residential Medium High St. Density) Commercial Density, from Residential Medium High(25 du/ac) density and add Public(P) Neighborhoo Small Lot Medium Density to Density to provide designation(Straw Vote 7 (DM 12) d,Density Subdistrict) Commercial consistency between 0) 0.35 FAR; Neighborhood and Zoning and General Plan P(RL-22) Residential Low` Public- Density underlying Residential I Low Density, 22 un/ac 62. Northwest Mixed RMH-25-D CG/RMH -A Change from Mixed Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: corner of Acacia Development (Residential (Commercial Development to change to Mixed Use recommend change to Ave. & Main St. Medium High General/ Residential Medium Horizontal-F1 (FAR Mixed Use Horizontal Density,25 Residential High Density 0.35)- 25 du/ac to reflect (MH-Fl-25) designation (DM 12) un/ac, Design Medium High existing conditions and (Straw Vote 7-0) Overlay) Density, uses Small Lot Subdistrict) Approved as of December 12, 1995 18 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY ' EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO, [__LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 63. Northwest RM. CN-Fl - D CG Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and corner of 17th (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium provides'consistency GPAC: recommend' St.& Olive Ave. Medium Neighborhoo General) Density to between Zoning and change to Commercial Density) d, Density Commercial General.Plan,modify Neighborhood'(CN-FI) (DM 10) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood to boundary line on map designation(Straw Vote 6- Design ' reflect existing 0) Overlay) conditions and uses 64. Northwest RM CN- F1 - D CG Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: corner of (Residential (Commercial (Commercial Residential Medium should add Public(P) recommend change to Orange Ave. & Medium Neighborhoo General) Density to designation to Residential Residential Medium High 17th St. (Roger's Density) d, Density Commercial Medium High Density(25 Density 25 du/ac and add Senior Center) 0.35 FAR, Neighborhood du/ac)to reflect Senior Public (P) designation Design Center and city owned (Straw Vote 6-0) NOTE: (DM 10) Overlay) land inconsistent with zoning 65. Northeast corner OP(Office MV-F8-SP CO-0 Change from Office Disagree with GPAC;: Agree with Staff: of Yorktown Professional) (Mixed Use (Commercial Professional to Mixed retain Commercial Office recommend retain existing Ave. &Main St. Vertical, Office, Oil Use land use designation Commercial Office(CO- Density 1.5 Overlay) (Commercial/Residen F2) designation`and (DM 2) FAR [MU], tial) remove Specific Plan 0.35 FAR [C], (Straw Vote 6-0) 25 du/ac) 66. South side of P,P- Q, I, RL -6-5 RL-01 Change from Public, Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff. Yorktown Ave. (Public, (Residential (Residential Quasi-Public, Add Public(P) recommend change to between Golden Quasi- Low Density, Low Density, Institutional to designation to Residential Residential Low Density West St. & Main Public, 6.5 du/ac) Oil Overlay) Residential Low Low Density and retain 7.0 uu/ac and add Public St. Institutional) Density maximum 7.0 uu/ac (P) designation(Straw Vote 7-0) (DM 2) Approved as of December 12, 1995 19 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL'. ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION .67. Northeast corner) RM RL-6-5 RL Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and of '17th St & (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium provides consistency GPAC: recommend change Huntington Ave. Medium Low Density, Low Density) Density to Residential between Zoning and to Residential Low Density Density) 6.5 du/ac) Low Density, General Plan,retain 7.0 7.0 du/ac(Straw Vote 7-0) (DM 2) decrease in density un/ac from 15 to 6.5 du/ac 68: Northwest RM 1---gip Holly Seaeli#f' Change from Agree with GPAC; Deleted; change to General eerneF a (Residential (Industrial, Speeif e Plan designation has been Crystal St.-& Medium Density-0.5 (Industrial/ previously approved Clay Ave. Density) FAR,Spee'c#'ie -4} I�la� (DM ) 69. Southeast'corner RM P(RM- 15) Holly Seacliff Add Public (P) Disagree with GPAC; do Agree with Staff: of Crystal St. & (Residential Public Specific Plan designation to not add Public(P),retain recommend retain existing Garfield Ave. Medium underlying (Residential Residential Medium existing Residential Residential Medium Density) Residential Medium Density (YMCA) Medium Density land use Density 15 du/ac and add (DM 2) Medium Density/IV designation'and add Specific Plan (SP) Density 15 1) Specific Plan(SP) designation(Straw Vote 7- du/ac 0) 70. Northwest IG RM- 15 IG/IL Change from Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and corner of (Industrial (Residential (Industrial Industrial General to Change to Residential GPAC: recommend retain Huntington St. General) Medium General/ Residential Medium Medium Density to existing Industrial(IG-F2) &Clay Ave. Density 15 Industrial Density provide compatibility designation(Straw Vote 7- (Cambro site) du/ac) Limited) with surrounding 0) Residential Medium (DM 2) Density area Approved as of December 12, 1995 20 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ' RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 71. Southeast corner Mixed P(MH-F3- Pacifica Add Public(P) Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: of Delaware Development 30- SP)' Community designation'with change to Mixed Use ' recommend change to Ave. & Main St. Public- Plan Mixed Use and add Specific Plan; Mixed Use,add Specific underlying (Commercial/Resident modify boundary line on Plan'(SP)designation and (DM 39) Mixed Use ial)designation to the map to reflect modify boundary line on Horizontal, reflect existing existing area map to:reflect'existing area Density 1.0 conditions'and uses (Straw Vote 6-0-1 abstain) FAR,30 un/ac, Specific Plan 72. Southeast corner Mixed CG- F2- D CO Change from Mixed Disagree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and of Main St. & Development (Commercial (Commercial Development to retain as Mixed Use to GPAC: recommend change Florida Ave. General, Office) Commercial Office reflect existing to Mixed Use Horizontal, Density 0.5 conditions and change to decrease density from 25 to (DM 39) FAR, Design Mixed Use Horizontal, 15 du/ac(Straw Vote 6-0-1 Overlay) F2 [FAR 0.5],30 un/ac, abstain) NOTE: Design Overlay inconsistent with zoning 73. North side of RL P(RL-6.5) RL Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and Garfield Ave., (Residential Public- (Residential designation to correct location on land GPAC: recommend retain east of Gregory Low underlying Low Density) Residential Low use map, retain existing Residential Low Lane. Density) Residential Density,to identify maximum 7.0 du/ac Density 7.0 du/ac, add' Low Density church/school Public(P) designation and. (DM 40) 6.5 du/ac correct location on map Straw Vote'7-0 74. Northwest RM P(RMH-25) RMH Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; Disagree with Staff and corner of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to provides consistency GPAC: recommend retain Modale Dr. & Medium underlying Medium High Residential Medium between Zoning and existing Residential Chapel Lane Density) Residential Density) High Density to General Plan, correct Medium Density 15 du/ac Medium High identify church/school, location on land use map and add Public(P) (DM 40) Density 25 increase in density designation NOTE: du/ac from 15 to 25 du/ac inconsistent with Zoning Straw Vote 7-0 Approved as of December 12, 1995 21 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 75. North side of OS-R CV F1 CF-C -CZ Change from Open Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Warner Ave., (Open Space (Commercial (Community Space Recreation to Retain existing Open recommend retain existing 100' northwest 1 -'Recreation) Visitor, Facilities, Commercial Visitor Space Recreation and Open Space Recreation and of Warner Ave. Density 0.35 Civic Uses, add Public(P) add Public(P) designation &Pacific Coast FAR) Coastal Zone) designation (Straw Vote 7-0) Highway (DM 35) 76. North side of RM RL-6.5 R1 - CZ Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and Warner Ave., (Residential (Residential (Residential Residential Medium provides consistency GPAC: recommend change 500' northwest Medium Low Density Low Density, Density to Residential between Zoning and to Residential Low Density of Warner Ave. Density) 6.5 du/ac) Coastal Lone) Low Density General Plan, decrease 7.0 du/ac (Straw Vote 7-0) & Pacific Coast in density from 15 to 7 Highway un/ac (retain maximum 7.0 un/ac) (DM 34&35) 77. Huntington Mixed Use RM- 15, CR Huntington Change from Mixed Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff.- Harbour Bay - F1 -SP Harbour Bay. Use to Residential Retain Mixed Use recommend retain existing Club Specific (Residential Club Specific Medium Density and designation and add .Mixed Use and add Specific Plan Medium Plan Commercial Regional Specific Plan to reflect Plan'(SP) designation Density 15 existing conditions and (Straw Vote 7-0) (DM 34) du/ac, uses Commercial Regional,' Density 0.35 FAR,Specific Plan) Approved as of December 12, 1995 22 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING 11 GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 78. Southern OS-R(Open RL-6.5 RL-FP2 Change from Open Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: termination of Space- (Residential (Residential Space Recreation to retain existing Open recommend retain Open Bolsa Chica St. Recreation) Low Density Low Density, Residential Low Space designation Space designation(Straw 6.5 du/ac) Floodplain) Density Vote 4-3) NOTE: new (DM 33) RA-CZ designation is Open Space- (Residential Park(OS-P) Agriculture, Coastal Zone 79. Meadowlark Planned CG RM- 15, Meadowlark Change from Planned Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Specific Plan Community RL -6.5 Specific Plan Community to Change to Mixed Use recommend change to area (Commercial Commercial General, designation and add Mixed Use and add Specific General, Residential Medium '' Specific Plan Plan(SP)designation (DM 24) Residential Density and (Straw Vote 7-0) Medium Residential Low Density'15 Density' du/ac, Residential Low Density 6.5 du/ac 80. Southwest IG P(I) Public- IL (Industrial Add Public(P) Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: corner of (Industrial underlying Limited) designation to Church is temporary recommend retain existing McFadden Ave. General) Industrial Industrial designation use, delete Public (P) Industrial (I-F2) & Product Lane to identify designation and retain designation(Straw Vote 7- church/school Industrial designation 0) (DM 18 81. Area bounded Residential RL'-6.5 Ellis Golden Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: by Ellis Ave., Estate;3 (Residential West Specific Residential Low modify'designation to recommend retain existing Garfield Ave., du/ac Low Density Plan Density 3 un/ac to Residential Low Density Residential Estate 3'du/ac Edwards St., 6.5 du/ac) Residential Low 3 un/ac (Straw Vote 7-0) Golden West St. Density 6.5 du/ac (DM 38) (increase in density) Approved as of December 12, 1995 23 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL' ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 82. Northwest of Residential RL-6.5 Holly Seacliff Change from Disagree with GPAC; do Agree with Staff: Edwards Ave. & Estate; 4 (Residential Specific Plan Residential Low not increase density, recommend retain existing Garfield St. and du/ac and Low Density (Residential Density 4 un/ac to modify designation to Residential Estate 4 du/ac northwest of Open Space- 6.5 du/ac)and Low Density, Residential Low Residential Low Density and Open Space-Park Seapoint St. & Recreation Open Space- 4 un/ac& Density 6.5 du/ac 4 un/ac,retain Open designations(Straw Vote 7- Garfield Ave. Park Open Space) (increase in density) Space-Park designation 0) and Open Space-Park DM 38 83.7 Southwest of IG CR- F2- D 1G (Industrial Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and Gothard St. & (Industrial (Commercial General) Industrial General to include entire site under GPAC: recommend change Edinger Ave. General) Regional, Commercial Pedigo ownership, to Commercial Regional Density 0.5 Regional expands commercial (CR-F2-D)designation: (DM 26) FAR,Design opportunities along NOTE: inconsistent with Overlay) Edinger corridor zoning 84. Northeast of Mixed Use I - F2- D 1L (Industrial Change from Mixed Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and railroad R.O.W. (Industrial, Limited) Use to Industrial to provides consistency GPAC: recommend change & McFadden Density 0.5 reflect existing between Zoning and to Industrial (I-F2-D) Ave. FAR, Design conditions and uses General Plan designation(Straw Vote 7- Overlay) 0) DM 15 85. North Mixed Use CO'- F4 North Change from Mixed Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Huntington (Commercial Huntington Use to Commercial retain Mixed Use and recommend retain existing Center Specific Office, Center Specific Office to reflect add Specific Plan'(SP) Mixed Use and add Specific Plan area Density 1.25 Plan area existing conditions Plan(SP) designation FAR) and uses (Straw Vote 7-0)` M 15 86. Northwest of Mixed Use CG - F1 Q-IL Change from Mixed Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: Magnolia St. & (Commercial (Qualified, Use to Commercial change to Industrial (I- recommend change to Warner Ave. @ General, Industrial General F2), provides Industrial(I41 or F2) Riverbend Dr. Density 0.35 Limited) consistency between designation (Straw Vote 7- FAR) Zoning and General 0)staff to verify density DM 27 Plan Approved as of December 12, 1995 24 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 87. 1,000' Southeast CG RH-30 CG Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: of Garfield Ave. '' (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General eliminate Residential recommend retain existing &Beach Blvd. General) High Density General) to Residential High node at this site on Commercial General(CG 30 un/ac) Density to create Beach Blvd., retain FI)designation'(Straw Vote (DM 1) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General land use designation 88. 1,000' Southwest CG RH-30 CG Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: of Beach Blvd. (Commercial (Residential (Commercial Commercial General eliminate Residential recommend retain existing & Garfield Ave. General) High Density General) to Residential High node at this site on Commercial General (CG- 30 un/ac) Density to create Beach Blvd., retain FI) designation(Straw Vote (DM 2) Residential node existing Commercial 7-0) General land use designation 89.' Northwest RL' RL -6.5 R1 - O- Change Residential Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: corner of Palm (Residential (Residential CZ/RL Low Density from 7 designate as Open Space recommend change from Ave.&Island Low Low Density (Residential to 6.5'du/ac(Existing Park(OS-P) Residential to Open Space- Bay Ln. and Density) 6.5 du/ac) Low Density, Open Space Areas) Park(OS-P) designation southwest corner Oil Overlay, (Straw Vote 5-0), of Evening Hill Coastal Dr.& Shady Zone/Residenti Harbor Cir. al Low (Seacliff) Density) (DM 3) Approved as of December 12, 1995 25 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 90. Northeast corner 1) OS-C MH- F2- 1) RA-0 - Change from Open Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff; of Beach Blvd. (Open 25-SP CC-CZ- Space Conservation, retain existing recommend retain existing & Pacific Coast Space- (Mixed Use FP2 Visitor Serving designations as designations as Highway(White Conservatio Horizontal, (Residential Commercial and recommended by the recommended by the Hole Area) n; 2) VSC Density 0.5 Agriculture, Oil Residential Medium California Coastal California Coastal (Visitor FAR,25 Overlay, Density to Mixed Commission Commission(Straw Vote 7- (DM 14) Serving du/ac, Coastal Use Horizontal 0) Commercial) Specific Conservation, 3) &4) RM Plan) Coastal Zone, (Residential Floodplain Medium 2) VSC- Density) CZ- FP2 Visitor Serving Commercial, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 3) MH- CZ- FP2 (Mobile home, Coastal Zone, Floodplain 4) M1 -A-O- CZ-FP2 (Industrial Limited, Oil Overlay, Coastal Zone, Floodplain) Approved as of December 12, 1995 26 (g\gp1ndus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN GENERAL ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN . COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION 91. Southeast of Mixed RMH-30 North Change from Mixed Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff: railroad R.O.W. Development (Residential Huntington Use to Residential change to Mixed Use and recommend change to &405 Frwy Medium Center Specific Medium Density to add Specific Plan' Mixed Use and add Specific High Density' Plan reflect existing Plan(SP) designation' (DM 15) 30 du/ac) conditions and uses, (Straw Vote 7-0) add Specific Plan designation 92. Southwest RM P(RM - 15) RM Add Public (P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and corner of (Residential Public- (Residential designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend retain Newland St. & Medium underlying Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium existing Residential Paseo Cir. Density) Residential Density) Density to identify Density land use Medium Density 15 du/ac (between Slater Medium church/school designation (SP)designation (Straw & Talbert) Density 15 Vote 7-0) du/ac (DM 30) 93 Northwest "Planning ' I'- F2- D MI -A-O- Change from Disagree with GPAC; Agree with Staff, corner of Reserve (Industrial, CC- CZ-FP2 Planning Reserve to retain existing recommend retain existing Hamilton Ave. Density 0.5 (Industrial Industrial designations as designations as and Newland St. FAR, Design Limited, Oil recommended by the " recommended by the (Part of White Overlay) Overlay, California Coastal California Coastal Hole area) Coastal Commission Commission(Straw Vote 7 Conservation, 0) (DM 14) Coastal Zone, Floodplain) Approved as of December 12, 1995 27 (g\gpindus9) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN " GENERAL: ADVISORY EXISTING PLANNING COMMISSION NO. LOCATION PLAN COMMITTEE ZONING DISCUSSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNATION DESIGNATION' 94. 1000' Southeast RL P(CG - Fl) CG/RA Change from Agree with GPAC; Agree with Staff and of Magnolia St. (Residential Public- (Commercial Residential Low provides consistency GPAC: recommend change &Adams Ave. Low underlying GeneraV Density to between Zoning and to Commercial General Density) Commercial Residential Commercial General General Plan (CG-Fl) and add Public (P) (DM 7) General, Agriculture) and add Public (P) designation(Straw Vote 7- Density 0.35 designation to reflect 0) NOTE: portion of site FAR existing (RA)inconsistent with Church/School zoning 95. South side of RL Western half PS (Public Semi Change from Remove from Agree with Staff. Talbert Ave. (Residential CG-F1 Public) Residential Low cosideration as part of recommend remove from 300' east of Low (Commercial Density to the General Plan update' consideration and retain Beach Blvd. Density) General, Commercial General and retain existing Residential Low Density (Crest View Density 0.35 on the west one half Residential ILow Density;' designation (Straw Vote 5- School) FAR), of the site designation on the entire 2)NOTE:designation is P Eastern half school site (RL-7) (DM 40) - RL-6.5 (Residential Low Density 6.5 du/ac) 96. Northeast corner RL P(RL 6.5) RL (Residential Add Public(P) Agree with GPAC; no Agree with Staff and of Springdale St. (Residential Public- Low Density) designation to change to existing GPAC: recommend retain and Heil Ave. Low underlying identify Residential Low Density existing Residential Low Density) Residential school/church designation,maintain 7.0 Density 7.0 du/ac and add (DM 25) Low Density du/ac Public(P)designation 6.5 du/ac (Straw Vote 7-0) Approved as of December 12, 1995 28 (g\gp1ndus9) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members VIA: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Qll.d FROM: Melanie S. Fallon, Community Development Director� DATE: February 26, 1996 SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION NO. 1 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-2/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 94-1 (COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: General Plan Amendment No. 94-2/Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 is the comprehensive update of the city's General Plan which includes the review and certification of an Environmental Impact Report. Since its adoption in December of 1976, the General Plan has undergone incremental updates to reflect the changing needs of the city; however no comprehensive update has occurred since the initial adoption. Due to changing community needs, population makeup, laws and development patterns, the General Plan is being updated to reflect current conditions. On September 16, 1991, the City Council approved a contract with Envicom Corporation (Planning/Environmental consultant) for the comprehensive update of the Huntington Beach General Plan. Planning staff will present the legislative draft General Plan to the City Council over the next three (3) study session meetings. These meetings will be working " study sessions" and non-public hearings. This format will permit staff to present preliminary background information and allow input from the City Council. The preliminary information to be presented will include an overview of the Planning Commission's actions, a review of the format and content, and a review of the elements. The draft General Plan contains 13 elements; five (5) of which are presented for your review tonight. The remaining eight (8) elements will be presented at the next two (2) City Council study sessions. Formal public hearings are scheduled to begin on March 25, 1996. It is anticipated that the review of the draft General Plan will require three (3) public hearings. Additional meetings may be scheduled as warranted. City Council 2/26/96 1 (CD 96-08) RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: " Continue the Study Session on General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 and Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 to the next scheduled City Council study session meeting of March 11, 1996." ANALYSIS: A General Plan may be thought of as the "constitution" of a city. As the " constitution," the General Plan contains the citizen's vision for the future of Huntington Beach and translates their hopes and aspirations into a set of policies. The decision makers can then utilize these policies to guide their decisions. All future land use decisions must be consistent with the directions established in the General Plan. The policies contained in the General Plan are very general and broad in scope. The tool that translates the broad policy statements of the general plan into specific requirements on individual land owners is the city's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. The city adopted a new Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance in November of 1994. State law requires that the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance be consistent with the goals and policies contained in the General Plan. General Plan Advisory Committee A 27 member advisory committee, called the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) met for three and one-half years on the development of a new General Plan. The GPAC was composed of citizens from various city Commissions, Boards, and Civic Groups with a wide variety of interests and backgrounds. The GPAC received input from a variety of civic groups and interested citizens. These included residential and commercial property owners, shopping center owners, car dealerships, homeowner associations, and the school districts. The GPAC's recommendations and discussions were guided by input from city staff and Envicom Corporation. The GPAC identified the community's strengths and weaknesses and developed policies to address them. The policies have been compiled into the Draft General Plan. The GPAC approved the draft General Plan at their last meeting on April 5, 1995. City Council 2/26/96 2 (CD 96-08) Planning Commission The Planning Commission began the review of the draft General Plan as recommended and approved by the GPAC on May 23, 1995. The Planning Commission conducted approximately 15 study sessions and held 12 public hearings on the draft General Plan. On December 12, 1995, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 1509 recommending certification of EIR No. 94-1 and Resolution No. 1510 recommending approval of GPA No. 94-2 as amended and including mitigation measures as set forth in the EIR to the City Council for final review and adoption. Elements of the General Plan Every city is required by state law to provide a General Plan that addresses, at minimum, the following seven topics, or elements: Mandatory Elements Land Use - identifies the location and distribution of land uses such as residential, commercial, industrial, and open space. The element also specifies the amount of building intensity. The Land Use Element for Huntington Beach includes policies that address design and development principles. Circulation - identifies the current and future transportation needs for the city and sets policies that ensure a safe and efficient transportation system. The Land Use and Circulation Elements must be correlated to provide a balance between growth and transportation improvements. • Housing - identifies the amount and need for housing in the city and sets forth policies that address the development, preservation and improvement of the housing stock. This element is not included in the update. Another consultant will prepare the Housing Element within the next 6 to 9 months. Open Space - identifies the location and need for open spaces in the community and sets policies that address the conservation or use of that space. Safety - identifies seismic, geologic, flood and other natural hazards in the city and establishes policies to help protect the community from the hazards they present. Conservation - identifies natural resources including water, soils, mineral deposits and wildlife and sets policies that address their conservation and development. City Council 2/26/96 3 (CD 96-08) • Noise - identifies noise issues and noise sensitive areas and sets policies that address methods for noise mitigation. Optional Elements The City of Huntington Beach has chosen to create the following optional topics, or elements, in the update of the General Plan: • Economic Development - identifies the economic issues in the city and sets policies that address strategies for the long term economic stability and growth of the community. • Urban Design - identifies the aesthetic strengths and weaknesses of the city and sets policies that address strategies that enhance the aesthetic quality of the community. • Historic and Cultural Resources - identifies the historic and cultural resources in the city and sets policies that address their conservation, enhancement, preservation and use. • Utilities - identifies the capacities of the city's existing utility systems and identifies improvements required to serve future development. Public Facilities and Public Services - identifies the types and quality of services offered to the citizens of Huntington Beach and sets policies that address the provision of the services and facilities in the future. • Air Quality - identifies the state of the city's air quality and sets policies that address strategies for its improvement. • Parks, Beaches, Recreation and Community Services - identifies the recreational opportunities and needs of the community and sets polices that address the preservation, enhancement and provision of recreational opportunities. • Coastal - identifies areas of the city that are within the state mandated coastal areas and sets policies that address the use, development and preservation of the coastline. The city is required to have a Coastal Element because of it's location adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. This element is not included in the update. Staff will prepare the Coastal Element in-house as staffing and time permits. City Council 2/26/96 4 (CD 96-08) Growth Management - establishes goals, policies, and programs that will promote growth and development based upon the city's ability to provide an adequate circulation system, adequate public facilities and services. This element is not included in the update. The element was approved in 1992 and is identified by reference only. The draft General Plan is to be as comprehensive as possible and incorporates new state laws. The draft General Plan is thus an effective and complete guiding document for decision makers. In addition, to the required elements, and optional elements it is intended to provide clear direction in areas that have not been previously addressed in the city's existing General Plan. For example, the Urban Design Element and Land Use Element will provide guidance for the aesthetic quality of the city. The Economic Development Element will provide guidance for the economic stability and growth of the community, and the Historic and Cultural Resources Element will provide direction for the conservation, enhancement and preservation of the city's historic and cultural resources. Study Session - Review of Elements At tonight's study session staff will present a review of eight elements. As part of the review, staff will identify the major issues, the discussions, and the outcome of the issues the GPAC and Planning Commission faced as they reviewed the document. The following elements will be reviewed: * Air Quality Element - no major issues were identified. * Noise Element - no major issues were identified. * Environmental Hazards Element - no major issues were identified. * Hazardous Materials Element - no major issues were identified. * Utilities Element - no major issues were identified. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The draft General Plan has been analyzed in Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 94-1. The EIR analyzed the environmental impacts associated with the buildout of the General Plan. The EIR was made available for public review and comment for 45 days from July 23, 1995 to September 5, 1995. All public comments have been responded to by staff and have been attached to the EIR. The City Council needs to determine whether the EIR considers all environmental effects of the proposed update of the'General Plan, is complete and adequate, and fully complies with all requirements of the California City Council 2/26/96 5 (CD 96-08) Environmental Quality Act. The EIR is an informational document prepared to inform the decision makers and the general public about the potential environmental impacts of the draft General Plan and to aid in the decision- making process. The EIR has identified that the draft General Plan would result in significant unavoidable adverse impacts for three environmental issue areas, regardless of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures. These environmental issue areas are: Transportation/Circulation, Air Quality, and Noise. Therefore the City of Huntington Beach must make a Statement of Overriding Considerations in order to adopt the General Plan. CEQA permits the decision-makers to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered " acceptable" . Where the decision of the public agency allows the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not at least substantially mitigated, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the Notice of Determination. On December 12, 1995, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 1509 with a Statement of Overriding Considerations and recommended certification of Final EIR No. 94-1 as complete and adequate to the City Council. COASTAL STATUS: Upon final adoption by the City Council, the General Plan will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the CCC. The certification by the CCC may occur approximately six to nine months from final City Council adoption. OTHER DEPARTMENTS CONCERNS: The draft General Plan has been reviewed by all city departments. City staff will present recommendations to the City Council on the Planning Commission's approved legislative draft General Plan. The city staff recommendations will be presented at the formal public hearings. In addition, any written comments received will also be presented to the City Council for their review and consideration. City Council 2/26/96 6 (CD 96-08) SUMMARY: City staff will present an overview of the draft General Plan over the next three (3) study session meetings. The formal public hearings will begin on March 25, 1996. We have attached the calendar of hearings for your review (see Attachment No. 1). Also, staff provided the Council with a working handbook to be used as a reference during the draft General Plan update process (see Attachment No. 3). The handbook is a white three ring binder and was distributed to the City Council in May 1995 (If you are unable to locate the reference handbook, please contact staff immediately and you'll be provided with a copy). The handbook includes a glossary of General Plan terms, applicable State General Plan Guidelines, and discussion papers and articles on subjects related to the draft General Plan. Each meeting's presentation will include a slide show which will give an overview of the nights agenda and the topics to be covered. Each presentation will include a review of the elements to be covered, a review of the goals, policies and programs for each element, and a review of the modifications recommended by the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Study Session and Public Hearing calendar 2. Chart - Location of Related General Plan Topics (existing vs proposed) 3. Legislative Draft dated December 12, 1995, City of Huntington Beach General Plan (not attached) 4. General Plan Update Reference Guide dated May 23, 1995 (not attached) MTU:MSF:HZ:h*--," City Council 2/26/96 7 (CD 96-08) ATTACHMENT 1 0 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Review Schedule January 31, 1995 The City of Huntington Beach is in the process of rewriting the General Plan. The General Plan is the "constitution"for the City. The "constitution"contains the citizen's vision for the future of the City and translates their hopes and aspirations into a broad set of goals and policies. These policies are then utilized to help guide decisions for the next 20 years. Your comments and participation are vital to the success of this document. If you wish to learn about the General Plan update or wish to make public comments, please utilize the following schedule(See reverse side for more information): Study Session 41 -:Urban Design Element 5:00 P.M. February 26, 1996 Recreation and Community Services Element •:Introduction to a General Plan :•Historic and Cultural Resources Element •:•What is a General Plan •:Public Facilities and Public Services Element -Environmental Impact Report •:Environmental Resources and Conservation Element •:How the General Plan was updated :-Housing Element -Update Schedule •:Growth Management Element •:Organization of the General Plan •:Coastal Element ❖Goal, Policy, and Objective ee Economic Development Element •:Major Recommendations of the General Plan Study Session #3 •:•Housing Element 5:00 P.M. April 8, 1996 •:Growth Management Element •:•Review March 25, 1996,actions •:Coastal Element -.-Circulation Element •:Air Quality Element ❖Land Use Element .-Noise Element •:Land Use Map •:Environmental Hazards Element •:•Hazardous Materials Element PUBLIC HEARING NO. 2 ,..Utilities Element 5:00 P.M. April 22, 1996 Study Session#2 Introduction ❖Public Hearing Procedure 5:00 P.M. March 11, 1996 -..Circulation Element •:•Overview •:•Land Use Element -Major issues -,.-Land Use Map ❖Environmental Impact Report ,-Urban Design Element Final Study Session #4 ----Historic and Cultural Resources Element 4:00 P.M. May 6, 1996 ❖Recreation and Community Services Element •:Review April 22, 1996, actions ❖Public Facilities and Public Services Element -Outstanding Issues c•Environmental Resources and Conservation Element •:•Review final action on the EIR -,,Economic Development Element ---Review final action on General_Plan PUBLIC HEARING NO. 1 FINAL PUBLIC HEARING NO. 3 5:00 P.M. March 25, 1996 5:00 P.M. May 13, 1996 •:Overview •:•Introduction •:Public Hearing Procedure •:Public Hearing Procedure •:•Environmental Impact Report •:Final action on Outstanding Issues •:•Air Quality Element •:•Final Action on the Circulation Element c•Noise Element --.Final action on the Land Use Map ..-Environmental Hazards Element ❖Final Action on the Land Use Element ...Hazardous Materials Element •..Final action on the EIR -Utilities Element ❖Final adoption of the General Plan PUBLIC HEARINGS AND STUDY SESSIONS All Public Hearings and Study Sessions will be held may be limited to raising only those issues you or in the City of Huntington Beach Civic Center someone else raised at the public hearing described located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered 92648. The Public Hearings will be held in the to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. If there City Council Chambers and the Study Sessions will are any further questions, please call the Department be held in Room B-8, both located in the lower level of Community Development at 536-5271 and refer of the Civic Center. to the above items. Please direct your written communications to the City Clerk: Please Note. due to the amount of information, any or all of the public hearings may be continued to Connie Brockway, City Clerk alternate dates. In addition, scheduled topics and Regarding the General Plan Update elements may be rescheduled to alternate dates. To City of Huntington Beach confirm the topic, time, and date, please contact 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor either the Department of Community Development Huntington Beach, CA 92648 at (714) 536-5271 or the Office of the City Clerk at (714) 536-5227 (714) 536-5227. ALL rNTERESTED PERSONS are invited to All public hearings will be televised live on attend said hearing and express opinions or submit HBTV Channel 3 evidence for or against the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the General Plan update was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the comprehensive General Plan Update would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report was warranted. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 will also be considered by the City Council and is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. In conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1, the City Council will consider mitigation measures and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Mitigation Measures are policies identified in the Environmental Impact Report that help to mitigate potential environmental impacts. If adopted, the Mitigation Measures will be incorporated into the final General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be avoided regardless of implementation of the proposed policies and/or mitigation measures of the Environmental Impact Report and General Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations identifies significant unavoidable adverse impacts in the transportation and circulation, air quality, and noise environmental issue areas. PLEASE BE ADVISED that upon final adoption by the City Council, the portions of the General Plan that are within the coastal zone must be certified by the California Coastal Commission. The certification process will begin with a Local Coastal Program Amendment submitted to the California Coastal Commission for review and approval. The submittal and approval may occur approximately six months to one year after City Council adoption. ATTACHMENT Location of Related Information in the Existing and Proposed General Plans The following chart illustrates the location of related information in the existing and proposed General Plans. The left hand column contains the proposed General Plan Elements and the right hand column contains the related topics of the existing General Plan. Proposed General Plan Elements Existing General Plan Elements Safety Public Facilities and Public Services Community Facilities Seismic Safety Utilities Community Facilities Hazardous Materials Safety Safety Environmental Resources\Conservation r Open Space and Conservation Noise Noise r Land Use Air Quality Open Space Conservation r Seismic Safety Environmental Hazards Safety r Open Space and Conservation Recreation and Community Services Recreation Economic Development Land Use Urban Design Land Use r Land Use Historic and Cultural Resources Open Space and Conservation Circulation Circulation Land Use Land Use gJames:gcnplamchart ATTACHMENT 3 LA T�VE lvoAi:T iz/Iz/q s ATTACHMENT 4 K-EF E LEW Coe (fv-�U 'I' h£ � UO'r E *t� � 02%26.96 12:27 'Cl 818 879 4711 E\l'ICOM CORP. 16002/003 HUNTINGTON BEACH DRAFT GENERAL PLAN EIR Significant Impacts Significant Impacts Adverse But less That Cannot Be That Can Be Than Significant Entirely Mitigated By Entirely Mitigated By Impacts That Do Draft General Plan Policies Draft General Plan Policies and Not Require or Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures Mitigation Transportation/Circulation Land Use Electricity Air Quality Housing/Population Natural Gas Noise Geology and Soils Telecommunications Biological Resources Solid Waste '(eater Quality Aesthetics/Visual Resources Cultural/Historic Resources Human Health/Hazardous Materials Water Sewage Storm Drainage/Flooding Police Services Fire and Emergency Medical Services Schools Parks and Recreation Road Maintenance Other Governmental Services ALTERNATIVES No Project Alternative (Buildout Under Existing General Plan) • No Growth Alternative • Reduced Buildout Alternative(Environmentally Superior Alternative) Leo . Page 10 - Council/Agency Minutes - 02/26/96 (City Council) Study Session No. 1 - General Plan Amendment No. 94-2 - Environmental Impact Report No. 94-1 - (Comprehensive Update Of The Huntington Beach General Plan (440.50) The City Council considered a communication from the Community Development Director transmitting material information on five elements of the General Plan Amendment: Air Quality Element, Noise Element, Environmental Hazards Element, Hazardous Materials Element, Utilities Element. Included was a communication from Brian James, Assistant Planner, dated February 21, 1996, submitting minor informational changes occurring in he technical synopsis sections of the Environmental Hazards, Public Facilities and Services, and Hazardous Materials Elements (These changes do not impact policies.) A communication titled Huntington Beach Draft General Plan Environmental Impact Report prepared by the Community Development Department was distributed to Council The overview of Draft General Plan, dated February 26, 1996, from The Community Services Department announce earthier in the meeting had been distrusted to Council. The Community Development Director presented a review of the presentation outline. She thanked Jack Bowland and Gerald Chapman for their leadership on the General Plan Advisory Committee and she also thanked the great number of citizens who gave input. She also thanked the Planning Commission for their hard work and dedication in ironing out many problems satisfactorily before passing it on to the City Council. The Community Development Director introduced Linda Niles, Senior Planner, Herb Fauland, Senior Planner and Mr. Woody Tescher, consultant. The Community Development Director stated that Mr. Tescher would make a report including the legal and planning theories on the General Plan. Mr. Tescher reviewed "What is A General Plan,"functions of a General Plan. He presented an overview of the Environmental Impact Report. Brian James, Assistant Planner, distributed material titled Overview of Draft General Plan dated February 26, 1996, from the Community Development Department. Tom Livengood, General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) member and Planning Commissioner, referred to a roster of the GPAC Committee and the groups they represented and the Council appointed representatives which had just been distributed to Council and the City Clerk. Ed Kerins, Planning Commissioner, spoke regarding the study session process used by the Planning Commission. Linda Niles reported on the purpose of the subcommittee on the General Plan which consisted of Councilman Bauer, Councilwoman Dettloff, Planning Commissioner Livengood and Planning Commissioner Kerins. He stated that major issues brought forward by the community and interested parties in the city were discussed and most were resolved to the satisfaction of most of the community in attendance, with a few outstanding issues remaining. 02/26/96 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes - Page 11 Councilman Bauer spoke regarding the issue, stating that the City Council should be very proud of the Planning Commission for the magnificent job and number of hours they have spent. He spoke further regarding the goals of the General Plan. Councilwoman Dettloff thanked staff and the Planning Commission and expressed her gratitude. Linda Niles, Senior Planner, using slides, presented a review on how the General Plan is organized. She presented an overview of the elements including the " optional" elements that the city chose to include in the General Plan. Herb Fauland, Senior Planner, reviewed the Major Recommendations of the Draft General Plan. Brian James, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Land Use Plan, the Air Quality, Noise Element; Environmental Hazards; and Utilities Element. Councilman Harman asked if the Gun Range noise and leaf blower noise was to be reviewed as part of the park element or noise element, or both. Ms. Niles stated that staff would look into this and these types of questions are what the staff is soliciting. The Community Development Director stated that a noise ordinance limiting decibel level maximum at the gun range would be appearing before the City Council in about two month and would be consistent with the Noise Element.. Councilman Harman questioned if the SCAG comment that there may be a need for a second generating unit at the Edison Plant had been discussed in the Air Quality Element or the Utilities Element, as the Air Quality Element points out that the Edison Plant is a major polluter in the City. Ms. Niles stated it had been and that a representative of the Edison Company was at the Planning Commission meeting and could also address the City Council. Councilman Harman spoke regarding the need to set guidelines if such expansion is planned. The Planning Director stated that the Edison Company representative had been discussing plant dismantling rather than expansion and that the General Plan Advisory Committee had discussed alternative land uses. Page 12 - Council/Agency Minutes - 02/26/96 Mr. Tescher reported that Edison Company, at the request of the City, had prepared a written response that they saw that saw no need for additional expansion for the life of the General Plan. Mr. Tescher stated other issues such as plant dismantling or replacement with something else had not been addressed. Mr. Tescher addressed the issue of air quality impacts from not only vehicle usage in the city but from the Edison Plant, adoption of overriding considerations the role of the Air Quality Management District, including following mitigation measure and requirements, policies in the Land Use Element regarding prioritizing alternatives for re-uses of public sites. Councilman Harman requested information as to why California Resources site had been omitted and Mr. Tescher responded that California Resources should have been included. Councilman Bauer commented on the need to find a method to finance infrastructure replacement and urged that the city move forward with this issue simultaneously with the General Plan. Discussion was held regarding the Reference Guides set of documents distributed by staff to Council last May and questioned if staff would be utilizing these documents during the study sessions. Ms. Niles stated there was a lot of good information in the Guide and she would review it to determine if there were things that would especially help the process go quickly and return to the Council at the next study session. The City Administrator reported on the infrastructure program being worked on by the staff and Finance Board and that he would be bringing it before Council. Council Garofalo Report Regarding FEMA Application - Bluff Top Erosion Project (120.90) Councilman Garofalo informed Council that he had learned today that the city's application for FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agenda) Bluff Top Erosion Project did not look promising and that he would keep Council appraised. MENIVED FROM 1i7Lirr AA � � AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD AT TH 2"� COUNCIL MEETING OF Z-�- 96 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK i i I Overview of the Draft General Plan I I I r February 269 1996 ilk I i f I l T Presentation Outline Overview i What is a General Plan? is ♦ Overview of the EIR ♦ How was the General Plan Updated? General Plan City Council Subcommittee ♦ Schedule i Next step in the General Plan Update process How is the General Plan Organized? Y i i R 1 I Presentation Outline (Cont.) What is a Goal, Objective, Policy, and Implementation Measure? Overview of. the Elements ii i Major Recommendations of the General Plan Major changes between the GI. AC and Planning i Commission's versions of the General Plan i Air Quality Element t Noise Element Environmental Hazards Element Hazardous Materials Element Utilities Element j I 1 Overview .I { ♦ Introduction ♦ Why is the General Plan being updated? ♦ When! did the General Plan Update process begin? ♦ Introduction of General Plan City Council Subcommittee ♦ Introduction of Staff JJ i I t ; .a i What is a General Plan? ♦ "Constitution" of the City and long term vision of the residents � � l � i Vision for our children --*, i Grass roots effort i I� ;i rk ' 1 i l a s r J. �k t r. i What is a General Plan? ♦ Functions of a General Plan: j Allows the Community to capitalize upon and enhance those qualities that give it identity and pride . Facilitates management of public resources . Guides responses to important Community issues. . Guides physical development. . :Educates and informs existing and potential citizens and a promotes the Community s Forces the City to focus on livability and our future, not 1 just focus on the resent P 114' J What is a General Plan . (Continued ♦ Legal Requirements of a General Plan: . State law requires that every city and county adopt a comprehensive, long-term General Plan (Section 653023 of the Government Code). . State law requires that city action must be consistent with the General plan. . The General Plan allows a city to exercise: Police Power - land use regulations Corporate Powers - provision of capital facilities r � C9. J What is a General Plan? (Continued) ♦ How a General Plan is Used: . Used to guide decisions to ensure consistency with the City's long range vision . Used to provide consistency with all City actions . General Plan policies implemented through the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, Specific Plans, and other actions plans to bring about the long range vision . Zoning and Subdivision Ordnance must be consistent with the General Plan 14..k Overview of the Environmental Impact Report ♦ Results of the Environmental Im act Report p p ♦ Mitigation Measures ♦ Statement of Overriding Considerations How was the General Plan Updated? ♦ 27 member General Plan Advisory Committee . Cross section of the Community . Representatives of various interest groups, Boards and Commissions . 36 public meetings ♦ Two (2) public workshops ♦ Staff presentations How was ;,the General Plan. Updated` (Cont.) , Television programs and newspaper articles Notice, of Preparation Scoping Meeting i 13 Planning Commission Study Sessions 11 ,Plann 'n Commission Public Hearings q � g g i I , T is r1 � � I � I I i General an City Council Subcommittee i Dicussec� General Plan Document 4. Dis"cus:se public hearing process Discusse inaj or issues Discu9se the schedule 1 1� T. E �i i• 't t General Plan Update Schedule February: 26, 1996, Study Session # 1 ♦ March 11 , 19961 Study Session #2 ♦ March 25 , 1996, Public Dearing # 1 April 8, 1996, Study Session #3 ♦ April 22, 1996, Study Session. Y12 ♦ May 6, 1996, Final Study Session ♦ May 13 , 1996, Final Public Hearing r F ext Stepin the General Plan Update Process Printin � g . i Costal. Commission ♦ Final Printing and Distribution Arnendir g appropriate ordinances and procedures I � I 1 4 j �! IT f r �Y't i i How : iS the General flan Organized? ♦ Introduction .. Com unity Development ment � ►; . �Lcrind Use . ;Urban Design . '.Hbusing t . 'H storic and Cultural Resources . :`Economic Development . G owth Management i I I r. I I ' I I How -is 4 e General flan d .Or anize `�g (Cont.) ♦ Infrastructure and Community Services . Circulation . , Public Facilities and Services Recreation and Community Services Utilities i ♦ Natural Resources ;.,En' vironment, ResourcesTonservation 11 1. . ` Air Ouality •I ti I� . .'C astal Q I I bti it • I r k� I How isIthe General Plan Organized? (Cont.) ♦ Hazards t . Environmental Hazards . Nolse . Hazardous Materials �f i i r How is the General Plan Organized? (Cont.) Organization of the General Plan Elements . Statutory Requirements . s4mmary of Baseline Data . Issues • Gals, Objectives, Policies, Implementation Programs and Implementation Matrix 1 i, What is ' a Goal, Objective, Policyand Implementation Measure? ♦ Goal (Page 16, General Plan Guidelines) . A Goal is a direction setter. It is a expression ression of g p community values and is therefore abstract in nature. A goal is not quantifiable, time-dependant or suggestive of specific actions. For example: . Create a diversified economic base for the City. Ensure an aesthetically pleasing community.. j i, } What is a Goal Objective, Policy and Implementation Measure? Cont. Objective (Page 16, General Plan Guidelines) . An Objective is an intermediate step toward achieving a . J p g goal . It may pertain to a specific portion of a goal or be ` one of several successive steps toward achieving a goal. It should be an achievable end and, when possible, measurable and time-specific. For example: r A 50 percent increase of downtown office space by .1990. . Provide fire protection and paramedic services to all pa '.ts of the City. 1 i. i f f i i ` what is , a Goal, Objective, Policy and Implementation Measure? (Cont.) Policy (Page 17, General Plan Guidelines) . A Policy is a specific statement that guides decision makers. It indicates clean commitment of the City y and be ..clear 'nd unambiguous. For example: g p . Continue to monitor businesses that may generate hazardous waste to prevent contamination of water. . Develop public parks and recreation centers that link r trails and existing recreational facilities. i; i i 1. p' t � i i i i What isla Goal, Objective, Policyand I Implementation Measure? (Cont.) ♦ Implementation Measure (Page 16, General Plan Guidelines) . An Implementation Measure is an action, procedure or t program that carries out a policy. :Every Policy must have a corresponding implementation measure. For example: . The City shall adopt a specific plan for the industrial park. . The City shall continue to implement the electrical facilities undergrounding program. r k i I t ` What is a Goal, Objective, Policy and Implementation Measure . (Cont.) ♦ Implementation Matrix . The Implern.entation Matrix describes each Implementation Measure, the responsible agency, funding F source and time frame. f i t r r i r - 1. t, l tl i t 1 i ' r s t I E I Overview of the Elements ♦ : State law requires that every General Plan contain the following seven (7) elements: g Land Use - designates general location and distribution of land uses and includes standards of population density and building intensity. I . Circulation - identifies location and extent of existing and proposed streets, highways and other transportation elements. This element must be � correlated with builout of the Land Use Element. Ir • t , r Overview of the Elements Cont. 4' Housing- addresses the assignment of current and projected housing needs, the provision of affordable housing and a .five year commitment to the provision of "fair-share" portion of the regional housing needs. . Conservation - addresses the conservation, development and use of the community's natural resources. y r . F i Overview of the Elements (Cont.) . Noise - identifies existing and future noise levels and mitigation measures for noise abatement. . Open Space - addresses the use of open space and recreational opportunities. . Safety - addresses the protection from risks of seismic, geologic, flood and fire hazards. V 1 'J 'r' ! 1 i' 1 Overview Of the Elements (Cont.) ♦ State law permits the preparation of optional elements. Huntington Beach has chosen to prepare the following optional elements: . Gro�vth Management - addresses the long term management of growth. a . Economic Development - addresses the economic 7 development and stability of the Community. Coa§tal - addresses strategies for the use 7 r dev ; lopment, preservation and enhancement of the Community's coastal resources. i q t I; J I Overview of the Elements (Cont.) . Public Facilities and Public Services - addresses the provision and quality of the Community's public services and facilities. AirQuality - ad dresses strategies for improvement quality. air m of the CoiYlunitY's ualit . . Parks, Beaches, Recreation and Community Services - addresses the preservation, enhancement and ;provision of the Community's recreational opportunities. is �!, Overview of the Elements (Cont.) . Urban 'Design - addresses strategies to enhance the aesthetic qualities of the Community. . Historic and Cultural Resources - addresses the conservation, preservation, use and development of the Community cultural and historic resources. r . Utilities - identifies the capacities of the City's utility systems and identifies improvements necessary to serve future development. i F i u t I � Major Recommendations of the Draft General Plan ♦ Land Use Element Development Threshold - limits the amount of new .development over the next 20 years based upon the .achievement of levels of service standards specified in the 'Circul'ation Element. : "Philos'ophy - The amount of development cannot exceed .the capacity of the City's infrastructure or ability to provide services. The development threshold will allow the City to monitor the amount of growth and maintain the Pquality of life for the residents. Major Recommendations of the Draft General Plan ♦ Land Use Element (Continued) . Thresholds (Amount of additional development) . Housing units 1. 8,500 . Commercial Retail 3 .2 mill. sq. ft. . Commercial Office 1 .6 mill. sq. ft. . Industrial 2.5 mill. sq. ft. . Overn fight Accomod. 2,200 rooms Thresholds translate into a total trip budget that can be t E .;transferred among uses. ,I a: i. i %iX I RecommendationsMajorof the Draft General Plan ♦ Land Use Element (Continued) . Thresholds implemented through: . Growth monitoring system . Periodic evaluation of traffic impacts . Adjusti-nent of development capacities to reflect changes brought about by capital improvements, increased mobility and trip reductions :.A Major Recommendations of the Draft General Plan ♦ Land Use Element (Continued) V.. Conservation of existing neighborhoods Multi-Family Residential design guidelines "Neo-Traditional" design principles for new subdivisions .'Differentiation of Commercial Corridors g $Commercial and Mixed Use designuidelirles New policies for the use of Commercial Centers .Retention of Industrial lands .:1 ,Re-use of surplus school sites 1 ' i i Major Recommendations of the Draft General Plan ♦ Circulation Element Implement the Circulation Plan of Arterial Highways Maintain Level of Service (LOS) Standards: . LOS D for intersections . LOS C for roadway links (Except portions of Heil and Banning) . Implement the Growth Management Plan (Development Thresholds) Increase public transit opportunities p PP Preserve the abandoned rail right-of-way . :;Consider a transportation center in the downtown area . :;Establish and maintain a comprehensive bicycle network j;i I, i t f MaJor Recommendations of the Draft General Plan i Economic Development Element Maintain and implement programs for business retention ' and attraction including: . technical assistance . pro-active marketing . expedited permit processing .Establish a comprehensive economic development strategy Review of major development proposals to determine fiscal impacts or benefits Emphasize attraction of businesses that support existing strengths and the development of growth industries s 'Consolidation of retail and industrial uses into centers Ma'j* or* Recommendations of the Draft General Plan 4 Urban Design Element Placement of design elements at key entry points Common design elements to identify areas r • Consistent landscape, lighting, signage, etc... along City streets `'. ' Possible incentives for the incorporation of public art in development projects • ;t I , i k j ; i . i . Major changes between the GPAC and PC versions of the General Plan GPAC Version PC Version Units 15,500 12,760 Comm. Sq. Ft. 411737,500 41M41390 Ind. Sq. Ft. 2,5051000 205,388 l { EI , y i I { i Land Use Map i Land Use Map and .Land Use Categories . Residential iJ Commercial Mixed Use E 'Industrial (I) . Public (P) 'Open Space z r l r t ti r Land Use Map ♦ Land Use Map and Land Use Categories (Continued) . Development Overlay Categories . Specific or Development Plan required (-sp) . Pedestrian oriented use and design requirements (-pd) 4 . Re use of historic structures (-h) . Automobile District (-a) . Design standards (-d) Residential Mobile Home Park (-rmp) E . 1. 1 � Housing Element ♦ This Element will not be updated during this process. The update will occur at a later date. Growth Management Element ♦ This Element will not be updated during this process. The update will occur at a later date. t t i f 3 Coastal Element ♦ This Element will not be g updated during this process. p The update will occur at a later date. Air Quality Element ♦ Vehicle Work Trips ♦ Transit Trips ♦ Carpool and Vanpool Trips ♦ Truck Trips ♦ Vehicle Trip Distances ♦ g P Bic cle/Walkin Trips Y ♦ Vehicle Emissions ♦ Particulate Emissions * Sensitive Receptors ♦ Energy Conservation ♦ Inter-Agency Coordination ♦ Refuse Reduction Noise Element ♦ Noise Ordinances, :Regulations and Guidelines ♦ Ambient Noise Impacts on the Community ♦ Traffic and Mechanical Equipment Related Noise Impacts ♦ Noise Impact Encroachment of Commercial and Industrial Land Uses ♦ Noise Impacts of Mixed-Use Structures ♦ Construction Noise Impacts v Noise Element (Continued) ♦ Noise Impacts/Encroachments Within Multi-Occupant Structures ♦ Noise Impacts of Entertainment and Restaurant/Bar Land Uses ♦ Noise Impacts of Rail Use ♦ Noise Impacts of Aircraft Operations ♦ Noise Impacts of Oil Operations ♦ Analysis and Mitigation of City-Wide Stationary (Fixed Source) Noise Impacts Environmental Hazards ♦ Geologic/Seismic Safety ♦ Erosion ♦ Methane ♦ Flooding ♦ Tsunami ♦ Peat Hazardous Materials Element ♦ Reduction of Hazardous Waste Utilities Element ♦ Water ♦ Wastewater Treatment and Facilities ♦ Storm Drainage ♦ Solid Waste ♦ Gas Supply, Telecommunication, Electricity 02.26:96 12:27 U1 818 8 i 9 4711 ENVICOM CORP. ilD002,003 RECEIVED FROM - AND MADE A PART OF THE RECORD T COUNCIL MEETING OF $ 6- 96 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIEBROCKWAY,CITY CLggCNTINGTON BEACH DRAFT GENERAL PLAN EIR Significant Impacts Significant Impacts Adverse But Less That Cannot Be That Can Be Than Significant Entirely Mitigated By Entirely Mitigated By Impacts That Do Draft General Plan Policies Draft General Plan Policies and Not Require or Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures Mitigation Transportation/Circulation Land Use Electricity Air Quality Housing/Population Natural Gas Noise Geology and Soils Telecommunications Biological Resources Solid Waste Water Quality Aesthetics/Visual Resources Cultural/Historic Resources Human Health/Hazardous Materials Water Sewage Storm Drainage/Flooding Police Services Fire and Emergency Medical Services Schools Parks and Recreation Road Maintenance Other Governmental Services ALTERNATIVES + No Project Alternative (Buildout Under Existing General Plan) • No Growth Alternative • Reduced Buildout Alternative (Environmentally Superior Alternative) GENERAL. PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE �(��;�„r June 24 $1994 HB Automobile Dealers Association: Planning Commission: Primary - Guy Porter Primary - Roy U. Richardson Alternate- Ed Coscolluela Alternate - Shirley Dettloff Chamber of Commerce: Tmjportatiom Commission: Primary - Dick Barlow Primary - Albert Ward Alternate - Haydee Tillatson Alternate - Ken Roth TiB-FV Association of Rultors: Community Services Commission: Primary - Kirk Kirldand Primary - Betty Kennedy Alternate - Jim Larkin Alternate - Margaret Hickey Amigos s De Bolsa Chica: Historic Resources Board: Primary - Tom Livengood Primary - Jerry Person Alternate - Bob Dettloff Alternate - Elizabeth Binsack Huntington Beach Tomorrow: Environmental Board: Primary - Mark Porter Primary - Bill Linehan Alternate - Dianne Easterling Alternate - Art Poindexter H.O,M,E, Council Idt Primary - Jack Howland Primary - Wade Hawley Alternate - Nick Tomaino Alternate - Clare Hansen City Council Appointees Allied Arts Board: Primary - George Gross Primary - Phil Mosbo Primary - Bob Winchell Alternate- Mary Shebell Primary - Phil Zisakas Primary - Greg DeWolf Council on Acing: Primary - Gerald Chapman Primary - Natalie Kotsch Primary - Jinn Townsend Primary - Dick Kelter Alternate - Pat Davis Westminster School Di n Primary - Aileen Manley Alternate: - Dr. Gail Wickstrom Conan List lwdlBJ Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RObert Escobar- NTINGT r, L :L St. 'c scueroq,r� .•.)� Huntii,9ton Beach CA 92 - 54$ y --- c�UNTY LEGAL NOTICE-- PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 (; 6 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 :�i` . =Hi117A Ht'lti;f.H �_' ��t�'T❑ t13 023-541-27 Seacliff Partnersioo 23 Corporate Plaza Dr. No �MINGTpy_� Newport Beach CA 92660 m N'.0 PO Nd�t / OIS C SE ACO23 g2ci O.V2' IN 02%10i97 o fir^ Q RETU 0'1 SENDER : NO FORWAR ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD Q RETURN `l".O SENDER I, 1909`-- ,Z-UUNTY CP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 ' Huntington Beach, CA 92648 t CA SI-2-7 AUTO .W 023-541-26 Seacliff Partners 23 Corporate Plaza Dr. No. ach CA 92660 T I NGTpy�_ �~ `' T NCONPOR4 RWVAR01R - - G4RDER SEACO23 926604002 IN 02/10/g7 I •r1A1R� RETURN TO SENDER even\ Q s r.v Q w NO FORWARD ORDER TO ON FILEUNAB RETURN TO ;SENDER C �B II, 1909 �O F�UUNTY CP LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, February 18, 1997. at 7:00 PIM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council Will hold a public Bearing on the following item: RECONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN ANMENDAMENT NO. 96-3 (RESOLUTION NO 97-3)/LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AMFNDNIFNT NO 96-2 (RESOLUTION NO. 97-3)/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 96-4 (OCEANCREST): Applicant: Oceancrest Partners Request: On January 6, I997, the City Council approved the above mentioned entitlements. On January 21, 1997, the City Council acted to reconsider their previous action because of concerns relative to the affordability level for the required eighteen (18) off-site affordable housing units. The two entitlements are as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 is a request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from RH-30 (High Density Residential-30 units per acre) to RL-7 (Low Density Residential-7 units per acre). This would reduce the permitted density on the site from a maximum of 30 units per acre (297 units) to 7 units per acre (69 units). The General Plan Amendment will also delete certain language in the Coastal Element of the General Plan that requires high density residential development and affordable housing on the site. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-2 is a request to transmit changes in the City's Local Coastal Prograrn (i.e., the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment) to the Coastal Commission for approval subsequent to the City's action on these two applications. Location: Nor-thxvest corner of Palm Avenue and Seapoint Street (see attached map). Project Planner: Scott Hess NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone. Final review and approval by the California Coastal Commission is required. If the applications are approved, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-2 will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission for final action. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the above item with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the reconsideration, the City Council must review and act on the ne2atiye declaration. These en\ironmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department. 2000 klain Street. and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. (97ccO10(,) N FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 13, 1997. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues yotl or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 PROJECT •- T•. ore, • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • ••• • • ••••• ••• • •••• • • ••••••••••••••• 0 d �C HUSTNL70N fit.tCH UCCA11FICS AAAIP (97cc0106) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 14UNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, February 18, 1997. at 7:00 P\14 in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: RECONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN AJIMENDMENT NO. 96-3 (RESOLUTION NO. 97-3)/LOCAL COASTAL PROGIZAA1 AMENDMENT NO. 96-2 (RESOLUTION NO. 97-3)/NEGATIVE DECL,ARITION NO. 96-4 (OCEANCREST): Applicant: Oceancrest Partners Request: On January 6, 1997, the City Council approved the above mentioned entitlements. On January 21, 1997, the City Council acted to reconsider their previous action because of concerns relative to the affordability level for the required eigliteen (18) off-site affordable housing units. The two entitlements are as follows: General Plan Amendment No. 96-3 is a request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from RH-30 (High Density Residential-30 units per acre) to RL-7 (Low Density Residential-7 units per acre). This would reduce the permitted density on the site from a maximum of 30 units per acre (297 units) to 7 units per acre (69 units). The General Plan Amendment xvill also delete certain language in the Coastal Element of the General Plan that requires high density residential development and affordable housing on the site. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-2 is a request to transmit changes in the City's Local Coastal Program (i.e., the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment) to the Coastal Commission for approval subsequent to the City's action on these two applications. Location: Northwest corner of Palm Avenue and Seapoint Street (see attached map). Proiect Planner: Scott Hess NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above item is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone. Final review and approval by the California Coastal Commission is required. If the applications are approved, Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 96-2 will be forwarded to the California Coastal Commission for final action. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the above item with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the reconsideration, the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 %Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) _536-5271. N FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will ' be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office after February 13, 1997. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written conununications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 PRO)ECT CWV, y d- or�e. • • . •�i i•1�s'I i�'•�:•. • c N •. .. • . •••.• . • • ..• o •. . . . . .• •.•.•.•.• .. . ... .••�•. • • . • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • . • • • • • •�• • • •�•�• , V( W J� HU.`7(ti'GTOV BEACH �cca,T�o� ,tip (97cc0106) Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 i 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Master eves of SeacliffHOA c/o ar uis Mang ment Group 3��q Da er treet�/ ��� TINGTp anta Ana, A 92705 J ir, t1ARQ00q 927055007 129b 02/11/97 NO IF'Y' SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS 9 Q A QUIS- `f�;WEL_l.- O G y �_ T_ = Y,i{;_ 4 11I;n! y 49 4JA JUT RN£ 5Tt�100 yG, QQ` - /y• �i-' U5 IN A 92760-69S3 '� ppUNTY Ca LEGAL NOTIG�_P BU `HFA2ING--:. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I ) • r Seaclifff on the Greens, Estate Serie: Mar uis Managem t \ 3009 airnler TINGE Santa CA92705 '`--- MAR0009 9270550- p NO-T Y SENDEP F I 'r' Q MAR IS-5 Q };P_ I jii iJ �µq'2' I�JALIV T AVE \�Qrn27B0-b AUNTYa` I l/ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HE _ ' ' 3�-�� awl IIlltt,:ltltiltt:l+tllt::lttltll ? ' I, I J , CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH TO: Connie Brockway, City Clerk FROM: Brian James, Assistant Planner DATE: February 21, 1996 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN CHANGES As we discussed on February 21, 1996, I am sending you a copy of late chances for distribution to the City Council. The changes occur in the technical synopsis sections of the Environmental Hazards, Public Facilities and Services, and Hazardous Materials, Elements. The proposed changes are shown in bold in the clouded areas. These are i:nnor informational changes to the General Plan and do not impact policies. cc Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner Herb Fauland, Senior Planner Tom Livencood, Planning Commissioner Ed Kerins, Planning Commissioner n_ rT 11t11111V 08 /g- C41'ec4* 5/'t,0,4Q.5VS" 'l r y"t f" HAZARDS CHAPTER ENi7Ro.,%mEN'TAL HAZARDS ELFwFATr 1-EH 13 insurance premiums for property Emergency Contingency Plans owners in the City. a. Coordinate with the EOC to prepare a Methane Emergency Contingency I-EH 15 Plan including early warning FEMA Development Standards procedures, an evacuation plan and Adopt and enforce the most recent floodplain emergency methane hazard mitigation development standards promoted by the Federal measures. Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). b. The City's EOC will maintain flooding contingency plans which provide for I-EH 16 early warning, evacuation assistance, Santa Ana River Main Stem Funding as needed, and damage assessment Pursue local funding to contribute to the Santa Ana e ev t. River Main Stem Project. C. Continue to support, assist I-EH 17 and expand the Local Tsunami Warnings Wire System Community Emergency Use the Weather Wire's information from the Response Team (CERT). National Weather Service or other appropriate warning systems to detect and warn of tsunami d. Coordinate with local school occurrences and other weather conditions in the districts in the region. This system should be monitored by the Marine Safety Division. which presently receive preparation of emergency daily reports on weather conditions for marine contingency plans, operations. This warning system should be incorporated into the City's Emergency including early warning Preparedness Plan. procedures, evacuation plans, emergency facility and shelter utilization, and emergency services availability. I-EH 14 Flood Insurance Programs a. Participate in the National Flood Insurance Program in a manner that provides the most financial and physical protection to residents and property owners in the City while minimizing costs to them. b. Participate in the FEMA's Community Rating System to reduce flood AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 v- z INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER PUBLIC FACILITIEsAND PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT • Senior Patrol (RSVP) • Citizen Police Academy (CAP) • Beach Patrol - prevents fights, alcohol and drug use, and thefts; enforces beach traffic control and City beach regulations; and acts as a crime deterrent; and • Anti-Crime Coalition - is a partnership between the police department and community members addressing crime and related problems in a multi-faceted approach. B. FIRE PROTECTION The City of Huntington Beach Fire Department has seven fire stations located at the following addresses (Figure PF-1): Station Number Station Name Station Location 1 Gothard Station 18311 Gothard Street 2 Murdy Station 16221 Gothard Street 3 Bushard Station 19711 Bushard Street 4 Magnolia Station 21441 Magnolia Avenue 5 Lake Station 530 Lake Street 7 Warner Station 383I Warner Avenue 8 Heil Station 5890 Heil Avenue 6 Reserved for any necessary future Bolsa Chica Fire Station The Fire Department proposes to relocate and enlarge Station 8 (Heil Fire Station) to a location near the Graham Street and Edinger Avenue area, and to build a new fire station near Springdale Street and the proposed Cross-Gap Connector in the Bolsa Chica Development. If the proposed Cross-Gap Connector is not constructed, two fire stations will be required. The two stations are proposed to be located in the Edwards/ eld area and the Graham/Kenilworth area. The Fire Department operates on a 24-hour shift basis with one command unit staffed with two persons, five seven paramedic engine companies staffed with tee four persons each, a combination engine, hazmat/light air company staffed with three persons , two ladder truck companies staffed with four persons each, and three ambulance units staffed with two persons each, . This provides a daily total lwhenfir'e refighters supported by t�xee dispatchers and administrative staff. Staffing levels are increased sk levels are high-for example, during high winds, active fire conditions, or natural disasters. AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- 33l yy INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMU"N-ITY SERVICES CHAPTER PUBLIC FACILmESAAvv PUBLIC SERVICES EZEti4E.&'T Additional staff is available, as needed, through mutual aid and automatic aid agreements with other cities. The City receives and provides staffing assistance from and to other fire agencies on a county-wide and statewide basis through the Office of Emergence Services w-hen a large fire or disasters occurs. Local automatic aid agreements with Orange County and the Cities of Westminster, Santa Ana, Newport Beach, Fountain Valley, and Costa Mesa Fire Departments enable the participating cities, and county calls to be answered by the closest available emergency units regardless of jurisdiction in which the calls occur. The rent tomatic aid a reements provide each of the coopelating cities with a five alarm capability. The euffe„row Growth Management ,Element's emergency response time Objective within the City ef Huntingten , including participation by other cities in the automatic aid agreement, is the arrival of the first fire or paramedic unit within five minutes, 80 percent of the time. Areas that do not meet the five minute response time 80 percent or more of the time are shown in Figure PF-2. Deficient area response times can be reduced to meet the Cit}.'s Growth Management Element's response \I time objective of respending within five mintaes 80 p nt e f the by constructing Master Planned ; Arterial Highways for new developments, a new fire station at the proposed Cross Gap Connector and Springdale Street, and by relocating Station 8-Heil to Graham and Production. The non-emergency response time goal is 15 minutes, 85 percent of the time. Approximately -4 59 percent of calls for paramedic service are responded to within five minutes. The slower paramedic response time is due to the current number and location of fire stations lew ref e€ par-amedie units; enly five ef the se,.,en Gity f4e s e with full paramedie . Sixty-eight percent of the calls received by the Fire Department are for medical aid. 6 percent are for fires (29 percent structure fires, 71 percent other fires) and t1'�e remaining 26 percent are calls for other type of service. The Fire Prevention Division of the Huntington Beach Fire Department is divided into five sections: petro-chemical, new development review, fire prevention programs, arson investigation, and public education. Petro-Chemical - administers the hazardous materials disclosure program, soil remediation and oversees oil field conditions; • New Development Review - participates in the planning review and approval process and building plan review; also ensures that new developments are in compliance with fire code requirements, and that fire protection devices and systems are installed and maintained correctly; • Fire Prevention Programs - ensures that all existing residences and businesses comply with City fire protection regulations. When fires occur, this section determines the causes and recommends remedial action; • Arson Investigation - investigates all fires of undetermined origin: and AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- �j1-{ INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER PUBLIC FACILITIESAA'D PUBLIC SERVCES ELF-WE.NT • Public Education -educates and trains the public about fire dangers. and; • Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) - cooridinated through the Emergency Services Division, educates and trains the public to respond to emergency situations. The Fire Department has integrated its services along with ' se ' 'ste s olio\\'s: • Emergency Medical Service - All requests for emergency medical assistance are handled by the closest available fire company and fire paramedic unit. • Emergency Rescue - Light rescue can be performed by an engine company but all heavy rescues r quire the tools and equipment associated with ladder trucks. • Emergency Services/Civil De ense - , ajor emergencies or disasters require the activation of the City's Emergency Operationsing Center (EOC). All City emergency resources are immediately placed under the command of the Fire Chief, Police Chief or designated assistant functioning as the City Civil Defense Director. The EOC is responsible for preparation and operational planning for the following types of emergencies or disasters: aircraft accidents, industrial accidents, catastrophic fires, earthquakes, floods, explosions, oil spills, tsunami, tornado, nuclear ac ident, war and civil disturbance. • Emergency ommurn Ions - e Fire Operating Center (FOC) operates under a Joint Powers Authority with the Cities of Fountain Valley; Huntington Beach. and Newport Beach, arm Westminster. The FOC controls fire reporting and dispatch, coordinates the emergency operations for the four city fire departments. and provides the mechanism by which the four cities can integrate their emergency operations. • Fire Combat Trainin_ - A Regional Training Center located next to the Gothard Fire Station is a consolidated facility operated under Joint Powers Authority for the Cities of Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach, Newport Beach. and Westminster. Fire combat training and simulation are performed at the Center. C. MARINE SAFETY The Marine Safety division is responsible for responding to all aquatic emergencies within the City limits, the coastal waters, the Santa Ana River, and, in the case of a mutual aid response, to other aquatic emergencies within Orange County. The City of Huntington Beach Marine Safety division is AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- 2j I) 3(0 INFRASTRUCTURE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CHAPTER PUBLIC EACILITIESAvD PUBLIC SERi,=s ELEMEAVT constructed, the existing tower is expected to be relocated to the west beach area to serve population increases from the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area. The Marine Safety division administers the eight week Junior Lifeguard Program. In 1995, the program included 900 children from the ages of 6 to 17 years of age. Due to the large number of participants, the program has outgrown its present facilities. A new facility is expected to be built as part of the south beach improvement project in the future. In addition to the Junior Lifeguard Program, the Marine Safety division participates in additional public education programs through visits to local schools as well as hosting presentations at the lifeguard headquarters. E D. EDUCATION e City of Huntington Beach is served by one high school district and four elementary/junior high schoo districts. The Huntington Beach Union High School District includes the entire City and extends slightly into Westminster and Fountain Valley fraeR-breve. The Huntington Beach City School District is the only district located entirely within City boundaries. The Westminster, Ocean View. and Fountain Valley School Districts all incorporate sections of Huntington Beach and parts of other surrounding cities. (The school district boundaries were set prior to determination of the cur rent boundaries of the City and were not changed after subsequent annexations to the City) 1. Huntington Beach Union Hi¢h School District The Huntington Beach Union High School District operates four high schools serving Huntington Beach students (Figure PF-3). Each facility serves grades 9 through 12. In 1988, the District began a five-year plan for reconstruction of some of its facilities with the ultimate goal of moving the District Offices out of rented facilities and into a permanent, District-owned facility. In 1990, Edison High School was expanded and a new wing called the Special Abilities Cluster was constructed to incorporate the students from the Guidance Center. A new continuation facility, called Valley Vista High School, was constructed in the City of Fountain Valley and serves the students from the former Wintersburg High School. The Guidance Center and Wintersburg High School facilities „ill be razed to make way for the development of multi-family housing. Minor renovations were made areeee leg at Huntington Beach and Marina Nigh Schools to accommodate district office departments. The remaining district office departments will be housed in a new faciliri . The district is currently slily under capacity in Huntington Beach (&,9" 9,250 total capacity, with 8,753 7,935 AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 III- ,3 7 I t li c d h � E s cg tg $ pC w > W�� I� L1L E UI�X V O c� < O ¢4 0 O tni� No. Na-.* PRDGRAM *SP0NSl3:E AGENCY I FLPONG SOURCE SCI-CDV E Pr-1 I tvaivations and Assessment Fr 2 I Improve and Uporade Services and Facilities i I• I• •I•' i 1 I 1 • I ; • i O+ ae,y- , p�3 I Fees • i I ;� !� I• i • I • ! j •i CnaK- 1 ` P;-4 Operationa!Proxams i ;• • i• i i I I ;• 1• i• a I• i.I o,� . P-5 i Neiy boftod 11'ztc't Pr- I Pubfic Education ;' l i• I I' I ! i l , l I l i'J I I o'=�";. PF-7 I Geve'.:F,-1e;,t ew Pe:; I•i !•! I.i ; I l I I I ! I I I i I 1 I c�:o:,;. i Co,m"wne!„ided Cfispalch Sysleml i ! i ; I-••►j.I I 'y ea` I Automated Recorc+s�Ma^.aoer;.ent Systems l ! i i s I 11 i jFL i Code G.lorcemenf PriC IA .e S:ety S:afrina-Sta"Trai,vne i l• j 1 i i 1 1 I 3 •?• I o > - I •� r 1 `-1 I i I I 1 -1 1 ' _� 1 I- -i j I _� Imo. Elilef0en.-V I:25pa'tse , !. , ! . il :ili Pt'-12( Inleraoex-v Coord.-ation i• �• � ,•I r •I.,1 • pm� i^ I Feas,x!iiy tt I I a 11 � aytud, • 1• Ii ! P oaal n' Pr-i4 i Fundino Sources i I I I ! I • I I• • • P t.yew upon . As 1=6nc pernuS y PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPLEMENTATION MATRIXi l CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN III-52 i HAZARDS CHAPTER HAZ4RDous.WATERIALS ELEMENT 5Haza.dees Waste T-Featment waste is ti'mTspe7Ted The maining petrW cum related to is transported 'Aft Tech ielegies: C. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION Transportation of hazardous materials through the City of Huntington Beach is regulated under the U.S. Department of Transportation. A routine shipment of hazardous materials does not require that any notification be given. However, transport of acutely toxic/hazardous materials must be reported to the California Highway Patrol and, if city streets are used. to the local police department. Since hazardous waste generators within the City of Huntington Beach are geographically dispersed. many major and primary arterials must be used for hazardous waste transport. In 1994, there are no streets within the City that are specifically designated as hazardous waste haul routes. However, the Huntington Beach Police Department has stated that most hazardous waste transport occurs along the City's truck routes (Figure HM-2). The use of truck routes is preferred because the routes provide better road conditions (i.e., level of service, signalization, width. etc.) than smaller roadway_s in the City. In addition. most of the truck routes are located away from residential land uses, thus reducing the potential for hazardous material accidents within local neighborhoods. Hazardous waste transport also occurs along the 405 Freeway. No hazardous waste transport occurs on the two railroads located within the City. D. EMERGENCY RESPONSE All Huntington Beach businesses handling or generating hazardous waste are required by state and federal law to form an emergency plan called a "Business Plan," and to forward a copy to the Huntington Beach Fire Department. This Plan must contain a site plan showing the location of the such substances, a detailed list of hazardous substances, a description of the evacuation emergency routes; and an employee training plan. The Huntington Beach Fire Department responds to all local reports involving hazardous materiaLS.. If necessary, the Department Hazardous Materials Team responds for special expertise and equipment. The Hazardous Materials Team provides hazard identification, risk assessment, and control measures. The is a provider agency in the Orange County Hazardous Materials Response AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 V- HAZARDS CHAPTER HAz4RDous AIATERIALS ELF_wF_%'T Authority (OCCHMERA) which provides four additional Hazmat Teams in I order to maximize available equipment and special expertise in any given emergency situation. The u ntin.t n Beach Fire D .,n. ent ,.,lull, .o nds to all leeal fepef4s T Huntington Beach also maintains a Multi-Hazard Function Plan should a hazardous material waste dent create the need to evacuate all or a portion of the City. ISSUES t. Hazardous waste material and toxics will be stored, treated and transported in the City. The Orange County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (OCHWMP) prescribes environmental criteria to be used in considering land use decisions for the storage and transfer of hazardous materials. The City can establish more restrictive criteria for the siting of new off-site facilities for treatment,transfer, and disposal, if it so desires. (11M 1.2.1) 2. Establish—a A collection system for small quantity generators should be established (businesses and households). (Hkf i.i.l) 3. The City should promote public and private industry educational programs for hazardous materials management. (HXf 1.1.2 and HM 1.1.3) 4. A more efficient coordination of hazardous materials management systems and regulations among jurisdictions should be implemented by the City. (Hlf 1.1.4 and nM 1.4.1) 5. The City should establish requirements for on-site source reduction, treatment, and recycling of hazardous materials. (HM 1.3.1 and HM 1.3.2) 6. The use, transportation and handling of hazardous waste material can be excluded from certain areas in the City. This action can provide for the protection of environmentally sensitive resources such as air quality, groundwater, ocean and beaches, wetlands, habitats of rare and endangered species, agricultural lands, natural resources of recreational, cultural, and aesthetic value, critical public facilities, and valuable mineral resources. (HM 1.2.2) 7. The City of Huntington Beach can participate in the process of selecting safe transportation routes within the City's corporate limits. Streets adjacent to high population concentrations, oe sensitive facilities such as schools and parks, can be considered for exclusion. (HM 1.2.2) S. Construction of hazardous waste facilities should be structurally stable to ensure the effective containment of the hazardous material. Areas unacceptable for hazardous waste facilities AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 v- `i1, Li � 51 i HAZARDS CHAPTER HAz4RDousMArERL4Ls ELEMF-n,r can be eliminated to avoid natural hazards such as earthquakes, floods and storm-generated waves. (HAM 1.2.1 ) 9. Plans for new development are reviewed by the various departments in the City. These departments are in good position to identify potential hazardous waste generators and advise them of required permits before the potential hazardous waste generators are established. N�� 14 Fl1�f 1.7M I.2.1 10. The City Fire Department and the City Police Department can continue to play a key role in the on-site identification of hazardous materials testes, tracking of illegal dumping (especially near the beaches), and emergency response to hazardous materials waste accidents through cooperation with the County Health Departments. (H.W 1.1.4. H;W 1.5.1, and HM 1.6.4) AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 12, 1995 V- rj �• 11E4 CITY OF Hl1NTINGTON BEACH ( CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION m WMT"MN RAM �Cn 77 TO: City Council Members FROM: Ralph Bauer, Mayor Pro Tempore Shirley Dettloff, Council Member DATE: February 21, 1996 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN REVIEW In preparation for the February 26, 1996, General Plan Study Session, we would like to remind you to review the scheduled elements prior to the meeting. This will not only ensure that all the issues are addressed, but also expedite the General Plan review process. The scheduled elements may be found in the General Plan binders that were distributed to you on January 24, 1996. It is intended that each Element will be reviewed two weeks prior to the Public Hearing in a Study Session. This will ensure adequate time for your review and for staff to answer any questions. The agendas specifying when each element will be discussed are attached. The following elements will be reviewed on the February 26, 1996, Study Session: • Air Quality • Noise • Environmental Hazards • Hazardous Materials • Utilities In addition, please review the Urban Design, Historic and Cultural Resources, Recreation and Community Services, Public Facilities and Public Services, Environmental Resources and Conservation, and the Economic Development Elements prior to the March 11, 1996, Study Session. cc Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner Herb Fauland, Senior Planner Brian James, Assistant Planner g:bj:gcnplan:ccrcv:rcvmcmo AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN STUDY SESSION FEBRUARY 26, 1996 5:00 P.M. *Overview of the Study Session Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) .What is a General Plan? Woodie Tescher, Envicom Corp. (3 min.) Functions of a General Plan Legal Requirements of a General Plan How is it used? *Overview of the Environmental Impact Report Woodie Tescher, Envicom Corp. (2 min.) *How was the General Plan updated? Howard Zelefskv, Planning Director Tom Livengood, Planning Commissioner Ed Kerins, Planning Commissioner (3 min. each) *General Plan City Council Subcommittee Ralph Bauer; City Council Member Shirley Dettloff, City Council Member Tom Livengood, Plannine Commissioner Ed Kerins, Planning Commissioner •Schedule Melanie Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min J .What is the Next Step in the Update Process? Melanie Fallon; Director of Community Development (5 min.) .How is the General Plan Organized? Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner(7 min.) Overview of Elements *What is a Goal, Policy, and Objective? Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (5 min.) *Major Recommendations of the General Plan and changes between GPAC and Planning Commission Goals and Policies Herb Fauland, Senior Planner (10 min.) Land Use Brian James, Assistant Planner (10 min.) AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN STUDY SESSION (CONT.) FEBRUARY 26, 1996 5:00 P.M. .Review of Elements to be covered at the first Public Hearing: Housing Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (1 min.) (Update will occur at a later date) Growth Management Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (1 min.) (Update will occur at a later date) Coastal Element (Update will occur at a later date) Linda S. Niles; Senior Planner (1 min.) Air Quality Element (No major issues) Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and Public Works Staff(2 min.) Noise Element (No major issues) Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and Public Works Staff(2 min.) Environmental Hazards Element (No major issues) Linda S. Niles; Senior Planner; Public Works, and Fire Department Staff(2 min.) Hazardous Materials Element (No major issues) Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, Public Works, and Fire Department Staff(2 min.) Utilities Element (No major issues) Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and Public Works Staff(2 min.) AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN STUDY SESSION MARCH 11, 1996 5:00 P.M. •Overview of the Study Session Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) •Review of major issues Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner (10 min.) *The Environmental Impact Report Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (10 min.) Mitigation Measures Statement of Overriding Considerations *Review of Elements to be covered at the first Public Hearing: Urban Design Element (No major issues) Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner(5 min.) Historic and Cultural Resources Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and (No major issues) Community Services Staff(2 min.) Recreation and Community Services Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and (Major issues include the provision of active sports Communit}- Services Staff(2 min.) facilities and the separation of City and School recreational facilities.) Public Facilities and Public Services Element Linda S. 'Niles. Senior Planner. Community- (No major issues) Services, Police. Fire. and Public Works Staff (5 min.) Environmental Resources and Conservation Element Linda S. Niles; Senior Planner(2 min.) (Major issues include the extent of environmental protection on private and public property.) Economic Development Element (No major issues) Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and Economic Development Staff(5 min.) *Outstanding Issues Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner(10 min.) I AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 25, 1996 5:00 P.M. .Introduction to the General Plan Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) .Public Hearing Procedure Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) •The Environmental Impact Report Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (10 min.) Mitigation Measures Statement of Overriding Considerations *Elements for review: Air Quality Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner, and Public Works Staff(5 min.) Noise Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner. and Public Works Staff(5 min.) Environmental Hazards Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, Public Works, and Fire Department Staff(5 min.) Hazardous Materials Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, Public Works, and Fire Department Staff(5 min.) Utilities Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner. and Public Works Staff(5 min.) Urban Design Element Linda S. Niles; Senior Planner(5 min.) Recreation and Community Services Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner; and Community Services Staff(5 min.) Historic and Cultural Resources Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and Community Services Staff(5 min.) Public Facilities and Public Services Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, Community Services, Police, Fire, and Public Works Staff(5 min.) Environmental Resources and Conservation Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (5 min.) Housing Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner(1 min.) Growth Management Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (1 min.) Coastal Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner(1 min.) Economic Development Element Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner, and Economic Development Staff(5 min.) AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN STUDY SESSION APRIL 8, 1996 5:00 P.M. .Review of the March 25, 1996, actions Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) *Review of Elements to be covered at the second Public Hearing: Circulation Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner, and Public (Major issues include the reliability of the traffic model, Works Staff(15 min.) Federal, State, and regional mandates versus the designation of City streets.) Land Use Element Herb Fauland; Senior Planner(15 min.) (Major issues include the Development Threshold, growth management and growth monitoring, and the treatment of closed school sites.) i Land Use Map Brian James. Assistant Planner(15 min.) (Major issues include individual land use designations, any changes in land use designations; the designation of wetlands areas, and the appropriateness of the land use designation on the northwest corner of PCH and Goldenwest.) *Outstanding Issues Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner (10 min.) AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 22, 1996 5:00 P.M. .Introduction to the General Plan Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) .Public Hearing Procedure Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) •Review of Elements: Circulation Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner._ and Public Works Staff(10 min.) Land Use Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner, and Woodie Tescher, Envicom Corp.(10 min.) Land Use Map Brian James, Assistant Planner (5 .;yin.) I AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN FINAL STUDY SESSION MAY 6, 1996 4:00 P.M. .Review of April 22, 1996, actions Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) .Review of outstanding issues Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner Review Circulation Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner, and Public Works Staff Review Land Use Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner Land Use Map Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner .Review final action on the Environmental Impact Report Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner Review of Statement of Overriding Considerations Review of Mitigation Measures •Review final action on General Plan Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner AGENDA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN FINAL PUBLIC HEARING MAY 13, 1996 5:00 P.M. .Introduction to General Plan Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development and Woodie Tescher, Envicom Corp.(5 min.) *Public Hearing Procedure Melanie S. Fallon, Director of Community Development (5 min.) .Final action on Outstanding issues Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner .Final action on the Circulation Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner_ and Public Works Staff *Final action on the Land Use Map Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner *Final action on the Land Use Element Linda S. Niles. Senior Planner •Final certification of Environmental Impact Report Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner Incorporation of Mitigation Measures Adoption of Statement of Overriding Considerations *Final action on the General Plan Linda S. Niles, Senior Planner g b,g-pl-ag-daI