The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApprove General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 14-002 for the comp Dept. ID CD 17-014 Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: 10/2/2017 _ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 111 - , ; REQUEST FOR. CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 10/2/2017 SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Approve General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 14-002 for the comprehensive update to the Huntington Beach General Plan by adopting Resolution No. 2017-41 Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 14-002, which represents a City-initiated comprehensive General Plan Update and was continued from the September 18, 2017, City Council meeting. At the September 18, 2017 City Council meeting, a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 and Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 14-001 was held. The City Council certified Program EIR No. 14-001, adopted the CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and continued action on GPA No. 14- 002 with the public hearing closed so the City Attorney could review potential effects of state Senate Bill 35 on the General Plan. The Planning Commission and staff are recommending approval of the General Plan Update (GPA No. 14-002). PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 by adopting Resolution No. 2017-41, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 for the General Plan Update" (ATTACHMENT NO. 1). Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. Deny General Plan Amendment No. 14-002. 2. Continue General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 and direct staff accordingly. Environmental Status: In accordance with CEQA, Program EIR No. 14-001 was prepared to analyze the potential environmental effects of the General Plan Update. On September 17, 2017, the City Council certified Program EIR No. 14-001. Attachment(s): 1. City Council Resolution No. 2017-41, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 for the General Plan Update" HB -323- Item 1.0. - 1 Dept. ID CD 17-014 Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: 10/2/2017 2. Public Hearing Draft General Plan Update, September 2017 — Only pages proposed to change from the May 2017 draft General Plan Update are attached 3. Public Comments Received on the draft General Plan Update 4. General Plan Land Use Map (Figure LU-2 of the Land Use Element) 5. September 18, 2017 City Council RCA 6. PowerPoint presentation 9-18-2017 Item 10. - 2 HB -324- ATTAC H M E N T # 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 14-002 FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 is a City initiated request to provide an update to the citywide General Plan; and The City Council desires to update the General Plan in keeping with changing community needs and objectives; and General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 is necessary to accomplish an update of the General Plan that will incorporate new laws and requirements set forth by the State and to provide consistency between all elements of the General Plan; and The City Council finds that the update of the General Plan will eliminate or substantially lessen all significant environmental effects on the environment, where feasible, as shown in the findings under Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the City Council has determined that any remaining significant effects on the environment found to be unavoidable under Section 15091 are acceptable due to overriding considerations as described in Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines; and The City Council further finds that the benefits gained by the City and its current and future residents by virtue of implementing the goals and policies of the General Plan Update override the unmitigable effects detailed in Environmental Impact Report No. 14-001, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein; and The City Council finds that the changes to land use designations as described in General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 will be compatible with surrounding land uses; and General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 includes revisions to the land use designation map in the City, which reflect amendments to the current land use designations; and A public hearing regarding the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 was held by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on August 15, 2017 and the Planning Commission recommended its adoption to the City Council; and Thereafter the City Council, after giving notice as prescribed by Government Code Sections 65355 and 65090,held a public hearing on September 18, 2017 to consider adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 14-002; and At said Planning Commission and City Council hearings, all persons desiring to be heard on said Amendment were heard. 17-5944/1627911W 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Title 7, Chapter 3, Article 6 of the California Government Code, commencing with Section 65350, General Plan Amendment No. 14-002,the General Plan Update, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at an adjourned regular meeting held on c2li i day of Oe,-h bee,(— , 2017. so Uwe Mayor tj ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk rty orney ^^^� REVIE D AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City an ge Community evelopment Director Exhibit A—Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Exhibit B— General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 17-5944/162791/MV 2 EXHIBIT A city uf muntington Beach General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2015101032 Findhign ofFact/ t t rnk e t overr ng on derat o August 2017 Lead Agency: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Prepared by: ATK 1:1 NS 3570 Carmel Mountain Road, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92130 Item 10. - 6 HB -328- Contents -------------- Contents 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 CEQA Findings ................................................... .....................................................................3 3.0 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives................................................................................. 13 3.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................13 3.2 Project Objectives.............................................................................................................13 3.3 Selection of Alternatives...................................................................................................14 3.4 Project Alternative Findings..............................................................................................14 3.4.1 General Plan Update Alternatives.......................................................................14 3.4.1.1 Alternative 1: No Project........................................................................15 Findings.................................................................................. ..16 3.4.1.2 Alternative 2: Full implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program(GGRP Alternative)..................................................16 Findings............................................................................................17 3.4.1.3 Alternative 3:Gothard Corridor Land Use Change (Gothard Corridor Alternative)...............................................................17 Findings............................................................................................20 3.4.1.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Evaluation.........20 AirQuality.........................................................................................20 LandUse...........................................................................................21 Noise.................................................................................................21 Utilities/Water Supply....................................................................21 Reduced Development Intensity Alternative...................................22 4.0 Statement of Overriding Considerations................................................................................23 4.1 introduction......................................................................................................................23 4.2 Significant Adverse Cumulative Impact............................................................ ..23 AirQuality.........................................................................................................................23 CulturalResources............................................................................................................24 Greenhouse Gas Emissions...............................................................................................24 Noise.................................................................................................................................24 Utilities and Service Systems............................................................................................25 4.3 Findings.............................................................................................................................25 4.4 Overriding Considerations............................................................. ...............................25 Proposed Project Benefits................................................................................................26 Table Table 1 CEQA Findings for the Huntington Beach General Plan Update...............................................4 Table 2 Draft GGRP GHG Reduction Estimates....................................................................................17 Figure Figure 1 Alternative 3, Gothard Corridor Land Use Change Alternative...............................................19 Atidns I City of Huntington Beach General Plan Upciate Program EIR. Pagel August 2017 HB -329- Item 10. - 7 1.0 Introduction 1 .0 INTRODUCTION This document presents the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations that must be adopted by the City of Huntington Beach pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15091 and 15093, respectively, of the CEQA Guidelines prior to the approval of the General Plan Update. This document is organized as follows: Chapter 1 Introduction to the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Chapter 2 Presents the CEQA Findings of the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (Draft Program EIR), including the identified significant cumulative impacts. Chapter 3 Presents the alternatives to the proposed project and evaluates them in relation to the findings contained in Section 15091(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. The City of Huntington Beach must consider and make findings regarding alternatives when a project would involve environmental impacts that cannot be reduced to a less- than-significant level, or cannot be substantially reduced, by proposed mitigation measures. Chapter Presents a Statement of Overriding Considerations that is required in accordance with Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines for significant impacts of a proposed project that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. The proposed project, as defined for CEQA purposes,consists of the adoption and implementation of the General Plan Update, which establishes an overall development capacity of 7,228 residential units and 5,384,920 non-residential square feet above existing (2014) conditions for the City of Huntington Beach and serves as a policy guide for determining the appropriate physical development and character of the City of Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to 2040). The General Plan Update also includes a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program (GGRP) and a Coastal Resiliency Program (CRP). A GGRP provides near-term specific and measurable actions, programs, and projects to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals as required by state legislation, and provides performance indicators and a monitoring tool.A CRP provides guiding engineering,ecological,and community resilience principles to address potential sea level rise in accordance with the adopted guidelines of the California Coastal Commission, while also identifying potential preparedness goals, actions, and an implementation strategy. In addition to the GGRP and CRP, the General Plan Update incorporates components of the existing General Plan (1996) that are still applicable today, while reducing the number of optional elements and proposing a streamlined approach to the goals and policies. The General Plan Update also establishes a new Research and Technology land use designation which highlights and prioritizes the city's commitment to job growth and sustained economic growth and vitality. While the General Plan Update does not change any of the existing residential designations or propose new areas of residential land within the City of Huntington Beach, it allows for continued residential growth within existing residential areas and the established densities of those areas.The General Plan Update functions as a plan for the management of resources and infrastructure to accommodatethis projected growth.As identified in the Draft Program EIR, the General Plan Update is anticipated to result in eight significant unavoidable impacts (three project-specific and five cumulative impacts). In comparison to the alternatives analyzed against the Atkins I city of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR Page I August 2017 Item 10. - 8 HB -330- Gonora| Plan Update as proposed, the City of Huntington Beach finds that the AJternativo2, Full Implementation of the GGRP'b the environmentally superior alternative. The General Plan Update is policy and framework document regarding future development within the City ofHuntington Beach and does not include any specific development project. Ax such, the General Plan Update under CEQA does not require discretionary approval from Responsible or Trustee Agencies. However in the future, as development is proposed in accordance with the General Plan Update, there may be projects that, in addition to approval by the city, may need federal, regional, and/or state Responsible and TrusteeAgencies discretionary approval overspecific aspects of the General Plan Update. Agencies that may have discretionary approval could include, but are not necessarily limited to: • Southern California Air Quality Management District regarding issues of air quality and associated permitting; • Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding water quality and quantity, as well as potential discharges into surface waters; • California Coastal Commission regarding potential issues relating to sea level rise; • California Department of Fish Wildlife regarding biological resources; • Ca|trans regarding the Pacific Coast Highway and other roadways within the city that are under the maintenance of the state;and • U.l Army Corps of Engineers regarding waters of the U.l and wetlands. Other agencies may use the Final Program E|R in exercising their duties even if they 6o not have discretionary permit approval authority over all o/parts of the General Plan Update(or implementation of individual projects developed as a result of the General Plan Update).All projects that are proposed in the future under the General Plan Update will 6e required to obtain all necessary discretionary actions and environmental clearance,separate from this General Plan Update. ----------------- Page 2 City m*vnx"gion Beach General Plan Update Program sm | Atkins Av«vmcv// H0 -33| TfeD0 lO_ - 9 2.0 CEQA Findings 2.0 CEQA FINDINGS This chapter presents the potential impacts that were identified in the Draft Program EIR and the findings that are required in accordance with Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines.The possible findings for each significant and/or potentially significant adverse impact are as follows: (a)Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which avoid, substantially lessen, or reduce the magnitude of the significant environmental effect as identified in the Draft Program EIR("Finding 1"). (b)Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the findings. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ("Finding 2") (c) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives in the Draft Program EIR("Finding 3"). CEQA requires that the lead agency adopt mitigation measures or project alternatives,where feasible,to avoid or substantially reduce significant environmental impacts that would otherwise occur as a result of a project. Project modification or alternatives are not required, however, where they are infeasible or where the responsibility for modifying a project lies with some other agency (CEQA Guidelines §15091, subd. (a), [3]). Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors". CEQA Guidelines Section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations. (See also Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors [Goleta II] [1990] S2 Cal.3d 553,565 (276 Cal. Rptr.410].) Only after fully complying with the findings requirement can an agency adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. (Citizens for Quality Growth v.City of Mount Shasta [1988] 198 Cal.App.3d 433,442,44S (243 Cal. Rptr. 727].) CEQA requires the Lead Agency to state in writing the specific rationale to support its actions based on a Final EIR and/or information in the record. This written statement is known as the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Statement of Overriding Considerations provides the information that demonstrates the decision making body of the Lead Agency has weighed the benefits of a project against its unavoidable adverse effects in determining whether to approve a project. If the benefits of a project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered "acceptable." This document presents the findings of the City of Huntington Beach as required by CEQA,cites substantial evidence in the record in support of each of the findings,and presents an explanation to supplythe logical step between the finding and the facts in the record. (CEQA Guidelines §15091.). Additional facts that support the findings are set forth in the Draft Program EIR, the Final Program EIR, staff reports to the Planning Commission and City Council, and the record of proceedings. Table 1 (CEQA Findings for the Huntington Beach General Plan Update) summarizes the potentially significant impacts of the Draft Program EIR that were reduced to less-than-significance levels with mitigation as well as the significant impact, as currently proposed for certification and adoption of the General Plan Update. Atkins I City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR Page 3 August 2017 Item 10. - 10 HB -332- Nnpinc 5 of Ptic fl5tpt�rnent[F averric&ng o� rderaFiens __.._. ........ .....__ ____..- .-- --_._- -- --__-- -.- . .__.._._�.- _-_.-- _ — Table 1 CEQA Findings for the HurttingfCn Beach General Plan tipciate Impact Statement Impact Summary impact Finding Air Qt�aity ,. The project would result in a project- i Air pollutant emissions associated with implementation of the { Finding 3.The City of Huntington Beach finds that even with specific significant and unavoidable air General Plan Update would result from construction activities implementation of all feasible mitigation measures and quality impact due to the violation of an and operation of uses allowed under the General Plan Update. -compliance with applicable General Plan Update goals air quality standard and exposure of The amount of emissions generated by future development and policies,emissions of the General Plan Update could sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant projects would vary depending on its size,the land area that i result in an exceedance of established thresholds For daily concentrations. Awould need to be disturbed during construction, and the length j emissions due to the speculative nature of future projects. of the construction schedule,as well as the number of i No mitigation measures in addition to MM4.2-1 through developments being constructed concurrently.Due to the MM4.2-14 are feasible to reduce construction or operational speculative nature of estimating emissions from individual air quality impacts to a'less than significant level. Projects at the programmatic level of the General Plan Update, emissions cannot be quantified (as there Is no project-level data) to establish whether the South Coast Air Quality Management € istrict (SCAQMD) thresholds would be exceeded. Even with GG incorporation of mitigation measures MM4.2-1 through MM4.2-14, 11 the General Plan Update would result in a significant and T unavoidable air quality impact due to the violation of an air ) X ;quality standard and exposure of sensitive receptors to �3 substantial pollutant concentrations. w .................................... ... -.............. -- -- - -- -- - -- ------------..-------- ---- ----- ----- �;' The project would result in a cumulative A significant impact may occur If a project would add a Finding 3.the City of Huntington Beach finds that even with contribution to an air quality impact, cumulatively considerable contribution of a federal or state implementation of all feasible mitigation measures and resulting in a significant and unavoidable J nonattainment pollutant- Because the Basin is currently in ;compliance with applicable General Plan Update goals cumulative impact to air quality. nonattainment For ozone, PMia.and PM2s,related projects could i and policies,emissions of the General Plan Update could exceed an air quality standard or contribute to an existing or result in an exceedance of established thresholds for daily projected air quality exceedance.Individual development emissions due to the speculative nature of future projects. projects may generate construcfion or operational emissions that No mitigation measures in addition to MM4.2-1 through would potentially exceed the SCAQMD recommended daily MM4.2-14 are feasible to reduce cumulative air quality thresholds for project-specific Impacts and would also potentially impacts to a less than significant level. cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those s l pollutants. for which the Basin is in nonattainment.Due to the ! speculative nature of estimating emissions From individual projects at the programmatic level of the General Plan Update, i emissions cannot be quantified (as there is no project-level data) l to establish whether the SCAQMD thresholds would be ? exceeded in a region deemed to be in nonallainment. Implementation of mitigation measures MM4.2-1 through MM4.2- j 14 would reduce these emissions but not to a less than significant -- .._._n._ „........,_. ,..w....�n... ...v. ,K. w level.As such the General Plan Update wauid....suit in a ..., .................. .....................,m.... .,...n.,,.....w.......,,...mFn__..,_._.,....-n fD ilkins City of Hunlhgton Beach General Plan Update Program Etft Page 4 Avgtrs12017 1 cu .......-......._.._....._.. ._.......... ..............__...._...._..............-----_.._-...._.._...._---- _— - ....._,_.._....._....._. ...._.....__.._.._......__._..__....._..._..._. ._.._...._.. - - - - ------------_..._._._.__...-....._...._..-_..__._...._...._ .._..._.2_DCfQA Frr9ClingS I t j Tai?ie w CEQA Flndiggs ftsr the:fiun#1ngFon Beach Genetaei Flan Update _.. ..._..,. _ ..�.,... .. _ w...._ t._,� __.. . ._� Statement -__.. w__ww,.z..� ImpacttSummary ...___._.€. Impact Finding _ . . - . ._� M... w_..........,._...w..,.,., ., r ... .. _ ._..,...._.... �. .. ,... .,,�.�.r .... . .,..... cumulative contribution to an air quality impact.resulffng in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact to air quality. 3 It should be noted that the applicable General Plan Update i serve t of ties would e to reduce he severity of this impact,but not p ou e iy mpa u o to a level of less than significant. 8ioloQirrc[i - Construcflon of the proposed project Project implementation and construction-related activities may -[Finding 1.The City of Huntington Beach finds that the could have a substantial adverse effect, !result in the disturbance of nesting species protected by the 'identified changes or alterations in the General Plan either directly or through habitat MBTA.Prior to the onset of ground disturbing activities,the City of Update,which would reduce the impact to existing habitats modifications,on birds protected under Huntington Beach shall implement mitigation measure MM4.3-1, to less-than-significant levels,ore hereby incorporated into the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.However, ;which entails focused surveys and avoidance measures for the project.No additional mitigation measures are with mitigation measures,this impact is ;sensitive nesting and MBTA species, and appropriate agency necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure considered less than significant. ;consultation. MM4.3-1. ..........._.._--__..._................. -- ----- .._.........._._7 -------..-.-__-.._.__- -—-- - -------.........................................................................._.........................................___........._...._...................._............._.._........... Implementation of the proposed project Although no wetlands are proposed to be disturbed as a result of s Finding 1°The City of Huntington Beach finds that the T could have a substantial adverse effect ;the General Plan Update,disturbance could result due to future j identified changes or alterations in the General Plan W on federally protected wetlands as development projects and construction-related activities [hat Update,which would reduce Impact 4.3-2 to less-than- defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water result in the disturbance or removal of wetland hob(tat.Prior to i significant levels,are hereby incorporated into the project. u' Act(including,but not limited to, marsh, the onset of ground disturbing activities,mitigation measure 1 No additional mitigation measures are necessary with the vernal pool,coastal,etc.) through direct MM4.3-2 must be undertaken,which requires that a wetland implementation of mitigation measure MM4.3-2. removal,tilling,hydrological interruption, ;delineation Is conducted prior to development of any vacant or other means.However,with mitigation [parcels,as deemed necessary by the City of Huntington Beach. measures,this impact is considered less if wetlands are found,the applicant WII be required to obtain all { than significant. ...�..... ..._.-.. .. .,„ r R necessary wetland permits and mitigate for impacts to wetland „ ,..� ..,�... .pw.,,,,,....,� .� �w.....,...........,,,,..,. r�,.�A..,.,�., ...., . -,.....�.._,.._. habitats. Culfurpl RI*sr�urces Construction activities associated with As if is currently infeasible to determine whether future Finding 3.The City of Huntington Beach finds that even with implementation of the General Plan ;development under the General Plan Update would result in implementation of all feasible mitigation measures{MM4.4-1 Update could cause a substantial adverse i demolition or removal of historical,archaeological and through 1AM4.4-4)and compliance with applicable change in the significance of a historical, paleontological resources within the planning area,the regvfremenis.the General Plan Update would result in a archaeological,paleontological and ;incremental contribution of the General Plan Update to these significant and unavoidable impact to historical. tribal remains on a cumulative basis.With cumulative effects could be cumulatively considerable. Even archaeological,paleontological and tribal resources on a incorporation of mitigation measures,this !with implementation of mitigation measures MM4.4-1,MM4.4-2, cumulative basis, No feasible mitigation measures in Impact remains significant and MM4.4-3 and MM4A 4,the General Plan Update would result in a i addition to mitigation measures MM4.4-1 through MM4.44 unavoidable. significant and unavoidable cumulative impact to cultural ';are available. 1 resources. ; Aikrns)City of Hunlinglan Qeaeh General Plan Update Program E1R Page 5 August 2017 Findings of i actlslar�m®ns of C3vareidfn Cansfde atians __-- _ — —___ _ _..._._ . .._. ------ ---------_-..---T_. __,........_______- _....___._..-___---------------- Table 3 C QA Findings for the Huntington Beach`General Plan Update .._.._.___.:_... .....r_.. _._._.M _. _ Irnperet SkAement Impact Summary Impact Fzr�ding_ _ �. ._. w. r_,........... _.._._....., _...-, ....... _..w.,.w.._.,...w.. ..... .... „. _------ ._.,y. ..__ ...__..._.....___ . _ ._ t Genlogy and Solis Future development under the General Wifh incorporation of mitigation measures MM4.5-1 through I Finding 1.The City of Huntington Beach finds that the Plan Update could expose people and/or MM4.5-3 which require that relevant studies be undertaken prior identified changes or alterations in the General Plan structures to potentially substantial to issuance of grading and construction permits,impacts due to Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- adverse effects,including the risk of loss, exposu.e of people to significant risk of geological failure will be significant levels,are hereby incorporated'into the General injury,or death,involving fault rupture, F reduced to a less than significant level. I Plan Update. No additional mitigation measures are strong seismic groundshaking and/or necessary with the implementation mifigation measures seismic-related ground failure,including MM4.5_1 through MM4.5-3. liquefaction.with implementation of mitigation measures and compliance with applicable State and City regulations this impact is considered less than significant Greenhayse Gas i~rz�isstans The project would result in a significant Although reduction strategies cuflined in the draft GGRP are Finding 1.The City of Huntington iBeach finds that the and unavoidable cumulative impact due i expected to reduce GHG emissions below the state reduction identified changes or alterations in the project,which would = to the generation of GHG emissions and ?targets,based on currently available data, uncertainties remain reduce this impact are hereby incorporated into the @ the potential conflict with an applicable in the implementation of these strategies.Most of the reduction General Plan Update.However,the project would result in a plan. strategies in the draft GGRP will require additional action by City significant and unavoidable impact.No feasible mitigation G� of Huntington Beach staff and officials,and the feasibility of measures are available to reduce the impact to a less-fhan- implementing these strategies and specific implementation I significant level. details rely on numerous factors that cannot be adequately forecast by the draft GGRP or the Program EIR,including F economic feasibility,technological improvements,and community and political goals.The City of Huntington Beach is not hound by state or federal law,or by any local mechanism,to implement the reduction strategies in the draft GGRP.Moreover, the draft GGRP does not analyze GHG emissions assoclated with specific potential fufure development projects,and thus forecasted GHG emissions may differ from actual future emissions when implementation of the General Plan Update begins,This may be a result of faster-than-expected growth,reduction 11 measures having a smaller effect on GHG emissions than 9 anticipated,or other causes that may not became apparent unfit future years. Due to these factors, the General Plan Update would re suit in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact j due to the generation of GHG emissions and the potential l conflict with an applicable plan No other feasible mitigation [0 Mkim City of Hunlingron Bench General Pfon Update Pror1rpm EfR Page 5 • Augusl2017 s W ti 2.0 CEQA rinns . - . - Tu#�1e 1 CEt A FirYdin�s fat the Huntington Bench.G heral Flan-Upiiata impact Statement impraet Summary µ w.... . ' _ 1 impact Finding r�_..�..___ .�,_,...ry ., .�.,.. ..m,.._,.,_......_._.-. ................ ,.- F ....... ............. . . .... .... _.....�....._..,..... , ?measures are available beyond the strategies identified in the draft GGRP. =::F,_.:..u......:.._,_...,..,u.,,...,..:..,.T....:.:.,:.,.:w.,.,..,....,.,...w,,,,,...,.,:,.-�......�.......,,,....yrv........T,.-....,m...._,..:�..::..:.:..:...:..:.:.,::,.:,,>:,,.:.::.,.:n.:,•,.,,,.,...,,.,T,..,..,.,,.:...:...,,.....,.n..,�.:......:.•.,,:.,.:,::.:>:.,,...,...:,......,...,..,..:,,:.r,,,.:.,.w..,...:,.,.:,.,..,..:.....,,...,,.,,..m....,..,.,w..,W,.n.,z....W,.,..,aW..:�..W. tiarards Implementation of the proposed project F The City has set minimum requirements for new building Finding].The City of Huntington Beach finds that the could create a potential significant construction within the methane overlay districts in order to identified changes or alterations in the project,which would hazard to the public or the environment 6 reduce the hazards presented from accumulations of methane seduce this impact to less-than-significant levels,are hereby through reasonably foreseeable upset p gas by requiring the appropriate testing and mitigation measures incorporated into the General Plan Update.No additional and accident conditions involving the 1 for all new buildings within the methane districts.Implementation mitigation measures are necessary with the implementation release of hazardous materials into the !of mitigation measure MM4.7-1 would ensure appropriate testing of mitigation measure MM4,7-1. environment.However,with and methods of gas reduction,as required by the HBFD, implementation of mitigation measures, this impact is considered less than significant. i Individual sites within the planning area !Development of any identified sites of contamination would be finding 7.The City of Huntington beach finds that the are Included on a list of hazardous required to undergo remediation and clean up before identified changes or alterations in the project,which would = materials sites that could result in the construction activities can begin.If contamination at any future reduce this impact to less-than-significant levels,are hereby M spread of contamination and could I project site were to exceed regulatory action levels,a future incorporated into the General Plan Update, No additional G create a significant hazard to the public `project would be required fo undertake remediation procedures mitigation measures are necessary with the implementation <? or environment.However,with I prior to grading and development under the supervision of of mitigation measures MM4.7-1 through MM4.7-3. implementation of mitigation measures, appropriate regulatory oversight agencies.Implementation of this impact Is considered less than mitigation measures MM4.7-1 through MM4.7-3 would ensure that significant. I contaminated sites undergo remediation activities prior to i development activities,resulting In a less-than-significant level. Implementation of the General Plan 'Constructlon of future development under the General Plan M `finding 7,The City of Huntington Beach finds that the Update could impair implementation of or Update could result in short-term temporary impacts due 10 identified changes or alterations in the Genera Plan physically interfere with an adapted I roadway and infrastructure improvements and the potential Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- emergency response plan or emergency :i extension of construction activities into the right-of-way.This significant levels,are hereby incorporated into the General evacuation plan.However,with could result in a reduction of the number of lanes or temporary Plan Update.No additional mitigation measures are implementation of mitigation measures, i closure of certain street segments.Any such impacfs would be necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure this impact is considered less than limited to the construction period of individual projects and MM4.7-4. significant. would affect only adjacent streets or intersecfions.Mitigation measure MM4.7-4 would ensure that emergency response teams E for the City of Huntington Beach would be notified of any lane closures during construction activities in the project site and that a minimum one lane would remain open at all times to provide adequate emergency access to the site and surrounding I Atkins Gf1yr of liuniingtan Beach GsnOrd Plan U{sduie Arogram EIR --. ---__�..—__-_._..._ ...._.-...._._......._............_.____...____.__.___.._..._._..__.......__,._......__-_.�... Page 7 august 2017 ------------ ..................... ....................................----—------------- ..................................... .......... ..................... Bt dc POner-cliIGKUPCC 0 Z ....Impact Statement Impact Summary Impact 9 .......... ............ ................ ............ ...... neighborhoods,thereby resulting In a less-than-significant impact, Fiydmlu�y and Water Quaiit�r ............................ ........... .................. ---------------------------- ...................................... Construction and operation of the 1 Future development under the General Plan Update would 'Finding 1.The City of Huntington Beach finds that the Specific Plan could increase stormwater include construction activities,which would temporarily disturb 1,identified changes or alterations in the General Plan runoff and alter existing land use such that soils potentially resulting in erosion. During the operational phase i Update,which would reduce this Impact to less-than- stormwatef pollutant loads or i of future development,the major source of pollution in 1 significant levels,are hereby incorporated Into the General concentrations, including erosion and stormwater runoff would be contaminants that have Plan Update.No additlonal mitigation measures are sediment,are Increased.These processes accumulated on rooftops and other impervious surfaces,such as necessary with implementation of mitigation measure could result in a violation of waste parking lots,pedestrian walkways,and other improvements prior MM4.13-1. discharge requirements or water quality to connecting to the storm drain system.Implementation of standards and provide substantial J mitigation measure MM4.8-1 would ensure that appropriate BMPs I additional sources of polluted runoff. are used by requiring preparation of a Water Quality However,With implementation of 6 Management Plan(WQMPJ in accordance with the Model mitigation measures. this impact is WQMP and Technical Guidance Document requirements and all considered less than significant. current adopted permit. ---------------- ----—--------------------------------------- F [-, -- - --------------------- --------- --------------------------------- ---- Future development under the General Construction activities are anticipated to have a less-than- Finding I The City of Huntington Beach finds that the Plan Update could result in substantial i significant impact on groundwater. Construction dewatering for identified changes or alterations In the General Plan 3 groundwater dewatering or deplete utilities,foundation excavation and FRI,and below-grade Update,which would reduce this impact fo less-than- groundwater supplies.Implementation of structures could be required,Development of the project would significant levels,are hereby incorporated Into the General mitigation measures MM4.8-1 and MM4.8- require coverage under the De Minimus Threat General Permit, Plan Update.No additional millgation measures are 2 would reduce this impact to less than which would include discharge quantity and quality limitations. necessary with the implementation of mitigation measures significant. Implementation of mitigation measures MM4.8-1 and MM4.8-2 MM4.8-1 and MM4.8-2. would ensure that permanent groundwater dewatering does not cause or contribute to a lowering of the local groundwater table that would affect nearby water supply wens. Future development under the General Development under the General Plan Update could result in an Finding 1.The City of Huntington Beach finds that the Plan Update could increase stormwater i increase in the amount of impervious surfaces compared to i Identified changes or alterations in the General Plan runoff,exceed the capacity of existing or 'existing conditions, thereby increasing stormwater runoff. j Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- planned stormwater drainage systems, Incorporation of mitigation measure MM4-8-2 would reduce this i significant levels,are hereby incorporated info the General and cause on-or off-site hooding. With impact to a less than significant level. Plain Update.No additional mitigation measures are Implementation of mitigation measure necessary with the implementation of mitlgatlon measure MM4.8-2,this impact is considered less MM4.8-2. than significant. CD Mims Oty of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR 8 August 20 7 _._-------------.-.-.- --__ ....__________________._...__---_------__----.-- _ ?ac�crna�ns. r CE( A FMfr+ s far the Huntington Beach Generdf;Pldn U_pddte Impact Statement _ _ Impact Summary Impact Finding .. ._... ._ ... ,...,.n.m .._.. _...... Future development under the General The storm droln system serving the planning area may be Finding 1.The City of Huntington beach finds that the Plan Update could increase stormwater constrained by or during future construction activities associated identified changes or alterations In the General Plan runoff,exceed the capacity of existing or j with development under the General Plan Update. Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- planned stormwater drainage systems, Implementation of the Municipal NPDES Permit requires that significant levels,are hereby incorporated into the General and cause flooding.However,with priority development projects must infiltrate,harvest and re-use, Plan Update. No additional mitigation measures are implementation of mitigation measure evapctranspire,or bic-treat storm events.While this would also I necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure ,v4M4.8-3, this impact is considered less result in a reduction in peak flow rates,this would not ensure that M A.8-3. than significant. future development has adequate storm drain capacity. Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.8-3 would require j that future development demonstrate storm drain capacity to ccccmmodale necessary flows,reducing this impact to less than i significant. Noise ��.... ... .... ,. .,.-,.,...,.m.........,... ,,...,... ..,.�..,. _...-.......... ---`-----..-.---' — -----_---r--------------------. ..._..---• ---------- ------- ...c - ......................................... _........ .... ....__....._...... -.... ......- The project would resulf in an increase in 'The General Plan Updole would result in an increase in average #Finding 3.The City of Huntington Beach finds that even with ambient noise levels due to an increase in i daily trips [ADT)associated with future development,increasing l implementation of all feasible mitigation measures and vehicle trips during operation chat would 'ambient noise levels due to roadway noise levels,some of which !compliance with applicable General Plan Update goals w result in a project-specific significant and ;would exceed established thresholds.As the increase in ambient j and policies,the General Plan Update could result in a U� unavoidable Impact. noise"levels is vehicle-T$lated,there are no feasible mitigation I significant and unavoidable impact due to an Increase in 1,measures that would reduce ambient noise levels and exposure the ambient noise levels (during operation) due to an below the identified thresholds and the General Plan Update increase in roadway traffic. No mitigation measures in would result in a project-specific significant and unavoidable addition to mitigation measures MM4.10-1 through MM4.1 0- noise impact. 5 are feasible fo reduce impacts to a less than significant While implemenfing the policies of the General Plan Update level. l would reduce roadway noise levels,community ambient noise 1 levels still would increase substantially throughout the planning area by 2040. Because the increase in ambient noise levels would result from vehicle-related noise,there are no available or T feasible mitigation measures that would reduce ambient noise 1 levels and exposure below the identified thresholds.Therefore, i this cumulative impact would remain significant and unavoidable. } -------_-__---- AEkins I City of Hvnrrngion Beach General Pion Update Program EIR Pie August 2017 Pinclfn s of rYsc lstoremeni aF pyerric ng Gonsiderofions._.._ _,_... ... _.._._._._._,..-.__.._ __._......... . ... . . ...... ........ _.......... _. . ___,.._.. _..._... . .. _.._.. _..._ --. ----------- ... Tdble 1 CE4A F'sndings far the Hunif`ingfian Beach General Plan Upr�ale Impact Statement Impact Summary Flnd ; Impact tn w...,........,... . ., ..............w..., ...,.,....,,..,,,..,..n_..,. ..... . ..„.n ,.....,,, ,,,,.M ,.,, _._..... ....... The project would result in a project- 1 Future development under the General Plan Update has the Finding 3.The City of Huntington Beach finds that even with specific significant and unavoidable potenfial to generate construction vibration levels in Implementation of all feasible mitigation measures and impact on ambient noise levels during exceedance of established thresholds at nearby sensitive compliance with applicable General Plan Update goals construction due to the exposure of 'receptors (i.e.,those within 50 feet of piling activities).Although and policies,the General Plan Update could result in a persons to the generation of groundborne future development would comply with General Plan Policies N- significant and unavoidable impact due exposure of vibration. i 4.A and N-4.D and implementation of mitigation measure persons to the generation of groundborne vibration during MM4.10-5 would help to reduce Impacts,construction vibration construction. No mitigation measures in addition to levels would not be reduced to a level that would be less than mitigation measure MM4.10-5 is feasible to reduce impacts j significant.Therefore,the General Plan Update would result in a I to a less than significant level. project-specific (and temporary) significant and unavoidable impact due to construction vibration levels. Compliance with General Plan Policies N-4.A and N-4.D and Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.10-5 would help to reduce potential groundborne vibration impacts associated with i future construction activities,but not to a level that would be less than significant because certain construction activities may still i z be required in proximity to nearby sensitive receptors.Therefore, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable. .F.:,:-..........M,.,.,,..,,..n��.. �n...,w�....�M.T. �.�.�,...,.....�,�,,.rr.._.,n_...M......� r,...,..,. ...,.,,,.. ...rv. ,,,, . ,,m.M., .,.»„,. .,.. ., m.,,..,, .,aM..,,W.,:. .,.x. ..�_ ,,,.ns .., �,.�,. .,.r�,w ...�. ,....,,�..,, .,,....... ...... ........, Public Services ----------- ------- --------------------------- -------------------------------------------—-------------------------------------- -_--_--, ......_..._ ._...... ......... Future development under the General .Future development under the General Plan Update would j Finding 1.The City of Huntington beach finds that the Plan Update would increase the demand increase the demand on public services including fire,police, I identified changes or alterations in the General Plan on public services including fire,police, libraries and schools.However,with incorporation of mitigation Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- libraries and schools.However,with measures MM4.12-1 through MM4.12-7,impacts to these public significant levels,are hereby incorporated into the General incorporation of mitigation measures services would be reduced to a less than significant level. Plan Update.No additional mitigation measures are MM4.12-1 through MM4.12-7,impacts to ! ;necessary with the implementation of mitigation measures these public services would be reduced to ':: i MM4.12-1 through MM4.12.7. a less than significant level 3 .» u,._.......... . ....Fq w„q, M,,a�. .rt_.__. ..a.. . .K. z,., ..... .,v... ... ..» ,.. .,.»,,....... .. ..u,. Recreation Future development under the General ;Future development under the General Plan Update would #Finding 1.The City of Huntington beach finds that the Plan Update would increase the demand increase the demand on recreational services.However,with ?identified changes or alterations in the General Plan on recreational services. However,with ;incorporation of mitigation measures MM4.13-1 and MM4.13-2 Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- incorporation of mitigation measures 'impac Is to these public services would be reduced to a less than ?significant levels,are hereby incorporated into the General MM4.13-1 and MM4.13-2,impacts to significant level. ` Plan Update.No additional mitigation measures are recreation would be reduced to a less necessary with the implementation of mitigation measures than significant level ?MM4.13-1 and MM4.13-1 » i--F +CG Cj Aflctrrs Cify c F Muntinglon&each General Plan Update Program FIR Page 10 August 2017 r r+ rn 2.0 CEQA Rndln,�s i . pp labte l.. ... __.CEQA_Fthdl the untrngton i33each General.11FIC Upd+frte Impact Statement lmpact Summary V_ s Impact Finding __. _...,,._ .,.._ ... _ -...,_. ._...._. ,..... ----. . .... ,... .__. ... -. . ..... ... .. ... Under 2040 conditions,development Implementation of growth allowed under the General Plan Finding 1.The City of Huntington beach finds that the under the General Plan Update could Update Is expected to exceed the City of Huntington Beach ildentified changes or alterations in the General Plan result in an increase in traffic that would 'standard for LOS for principal intersections(LOS Q) and F Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- exceed the City of Huntington Beach secondary (LOS C) under the Amended MPAH scenario at the significant levels,are hereby incorporated into the General standard LOS for Intersections under the !following locations: Plan Update. No additional mitigation measures are amended MPAH scenario,With ■Gothard Street and Center Avenue(Secondary Intersection) necessary with the implementation of mitigation measures incorporation of mitigation measures i MM4.14-1 through MM4.13-3. MM4.14-1 through MM4.14 3, these ■Beach Boulevard and Heil Avenue{Principal Intersection impacts would be reduced to a less than i■Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue(Principal Intersection) significant level. All other intersections are expected to operate at acceptable LOS.With incorporation of mitigation measures MM4.14-1 through MM4.14-3,these impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. _........ .,....,...... ................ ..._._.r.... _._.... .... ...... ... . Uiilktles rind 5ervlca 5 stems Z Future development under the General i Future development under the General Plan Update could 'Finding 1.The City of Huntington beach finds that the X Plan Update could require new sewer introduce the need for additional infrastructure or connections to identified changes or alteratlons in the General Pion connections,and could require or result in existing infrastructure,including sewer connections and water Update,which would reduce this impact to less-than- c the construction of new or expanded conveyance systems.With incorporation of mitigation measure I significant levels,are hereby Incorporated into the General wastewater conveyance systems. MM4.15-1 and adherence to existing City of Huntington Beach !Plan Update.No additional mitigation measures is However,with implementation of processes,this impact would be reduced to a less than ;necessary with the implementation of mitigation measures mitigatlon measures MM4.15-1, this impact significant level. t MM4.15-1. is considered less than significant, _�. ---------- _ ------- ---- — - - -- —-—-.-._._ --- - ---•The project would result in a significant Given the uncertainty of water supplies across the western United Finding 3.The City of Huntington Beach finds that even with and unavoidable project-specific impact States and throughout the state of California,a future supply implementation of all feasible mitigation measures and on existing water supplies. deficit would result Ina significant and unavoidable impact. Until compliance with applicable General Plan Update goals such time as greater confidence in and comr-nitment from water and policies,the General Plan Update could result in a suppliers can be made,even with implementation of mitigation significant and unavoidable impact due to water supply. measure MM4,i 5-2,fihe General Plan Update would No mitigation measures in addition to MM4,1 5-2 is are conservatively result in a significant and unavoidable project- feasible to reduce water supply impacts to a less than specific impact. significant level. Atkins f Cuty of itunlin9ton Beoch General Plan Update Program EIR Page 1 r Augus12017 F1ndfns6fFractlslfemento(Orer�cSnCansfderahai7s __ _____ ________.... .... _._......._.._-__.._..___.._.__...___,.__ ......._...___ ...... ., ..,.. ..,. _..__....._..__.. Table 1 CEQA Findlhiis for the Huntington Beach General Plat, Updat Impact Statement lmpaef 5ummcary lmpact Finding i The project would result in a cumulatively 1 As with the project-specific impact,given the uncertainty of Finding 3.The City of Huntington Beach finds that even with considerable contribution to water ;water supply across the western United States and throughout implementation of all feasible mitigation measures and demand and would result in a significant the state of California,a future supply defiicit would result in a �compliance with applicable General Plan Update goals and unavoidable cumulative impact, significant and unavoidable impact.Until such time as greater and policies,the General Plan Update could result in a confidence in and commitment from water suppliers can be ?significant and unavoidable impact due to water supply. mode,even with implementation of mitigation measure MM4.15- No mifgation measures in addition to MM4.15-2 is are 12, the General Plan Update would result in a cumulatively f feasible to reduce cumulative water supply impacts to a considerable contribution to water demand,result in a significant less than significant level.. and unavoidable cumulative Impact. �._ ....... .............................. . _ ._ ....... _. ' _ . ., .............. z iJrlJ T H� CD Atkins City of Hunling'on SeaCh General Plan Updote Program JR page 12 • August 2017 ------------...._._,____._....-.-.__.-...._.-........-.___...-.-.._.-.-_._.-.-._._._.-_----.----„---.----.--........................ _,......._3.Q Findlnc�s_Re�grdlnq ProLect_Alternatives 3.0 FINDINGS REGARDING PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 3.1 Introduction The Draft Program EIR prepared for the General Pian Update considered three alternatives to the project as proposed. Pursuant to Section 15126.6(a)of the CEQA Guidelines,the primary intent of an alternatives evaluation is to "describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." This chapter describes the project objectives and criteria used to develop and evaluate project alternatives presented in the Draft Program EIR.A description of the alternatives compared to the General Plan Update and the findings regarding the feasibility of adopting the described alternatives is presented for use by the City of Huntington Beach in the decision-making process. 3.2 Project Objectives The guiding principles for the General Plan Update have been modified as follows to serve as project objectives for the Program EIR: 1) Economic Vitality: Maintain an innovation-friendly environment where local businesses thrive and become a top choice for highly qualified job seekers. 2) Infrastructure: Update water, sewer,drainage,street, and other infrastructure facilities through a comprehensive systems approach to adequately serve future growth while supporting the existing community. 3) Open Space and Recreation: Maintain a balance of open space and recreational activities throughout the community. 4) Surf City Community Image: Promote Huntington Beach's unique Surf City image, identity, and culture as a beach community. 5) Public Safety:Create a safe and secure community by preparing for natural hazards and improving street lighting and design to enhance safety in public areas, parks,and streets. 6) Redevelopment and Revitalization: Revitalize commercial corridors and older industrial areas to support economic development. Enhance the community through successful infill development and a diverse array of housing types. 7) Mobility and Access: Retrofit high-traffic corridors to better connect cyclists, pedestrians, and transit users,support use of alternative fuel vehicles, and reduce traffic congestion. 8) Resource Conservation: Protect natural resources within the community and become a regional leader in sustainability. Shift toward renewable energy resources and conservation practices to achieve the city's self-sufficiency goals. Atkins I Gty of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR Y v Page 13 August 2017 Item 10. - 20 HB -342- Findax�s of faci(Siatement of Dv_ending_Cgns derafions_-__,___ _ __ 9) Resident Services: Update and expand community and social services to meet the needs of all community members, including youth and seniors. 10) Culture and Arts:Support programs,activities,and facilities that celebrate the city's historical and cultural heritage. 3.3 Selection of Alternatives The range of feasible alternatives was selected and discussed in a manner to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making. Among the factors that were taken into account when considering the feasibility of alternatives (as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6[f][1]) were environmental impacts, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries, and attainment of project objectives. As stated in Section 15126.6(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Draft Program EIR need not consider an alternative whose effects could not be reasonably identified,whose implementation is remote or speculative, or one that would not achieve the basic project objectives. The analysis includes sufficient information about each alternative to provide meaningful evaluation, analysis and comparison with the proposed project. 3.4 Project Alternative Findings The following is a description of the alternatives evaluated in comparison to the General Plan Update, as well as a description of the specific economic, social, or other considerations that make them infeasible for avoiding or lessening the impacts. The City of Huntington Beach finds that the adoption of both Alternative 2 and 3 could be feasible,given direction from the Planning Commission and/or City Council. 3.4.1 General Plan Update Alternatives As shown below and in Chapter 5 (Alternatives) of the Draft Program EIR, three alternatives were evaluated in comparison to the proposed project, including the No Project Alternative required by CEQA. The environmental advantages and disadvantages of each of these alternatives are described. The alternatives that were selected for analysis include: ■ Alternative 1:No Project—The No Project Alternative assumes the continued implementation of the existing General Plan (1996), instead of the General Plan Update as proposed. Under this alternative, the existing General Plan land uses would remain in place and development within the City of Huntington Beach would occur as in a reasonable manner,as allowed by the goals and polices of the existing General Plan.This alternative,which is required by CEQA, assumes that the existing General Plan and implementing zoning would remain unchanged. The existing General Plan would remain in effect, and no update to the existing General Plan goals and policies would occur.The No Project Alternative would allow for an additional 1,096 residential units above that proposed in the General Plan Update and 4,662,990 square feet of development below that proposed in the General Plan Update. ■ Alternative 2: Full Implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program (GGRP Alternative)—Under this alternative,the City of Huntington Beach would require and implement the entirety of the draft GGRP,which is currently proposed as a voluntary program as part of the General Plan Update.Policy ERC-5.A in the General Plan Update sets targets for Huntington Beach to reduce its total GHG emissions to 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 53.33 percent -------------_-.._._.------------.-----.........-_.-........----._..._-.-..__._-.-------------------------_._._._._._._.-___---------------_._._._._------_____________---- --_--------------.__-_--- Page 14 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR I Atkins August 2017 HB -343- Item 1.0. - 21 ---------- _._ ._.____,__....__.. ____ ____ ._.__. ___3_.0_findingsRegardin�Pro}ectAliemal'ryes below the 2020 target by 2040, placing the community on a trajectory to match the state's long- term (2050) GHG reduction goals. Under this alternative, the draft GGRP would no longer be voluntary and instead would be a required implementation action and undertaken in its entirety, as part of approval of the General Plan Update. Based on the estimates provided in the draft GGRP,full implementation would reduce GHG emissions in both 2020 and 2040 timeframes to a less than significant level.As a result,the GGRP Alternative would eliminate one of the significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the General Plan Update. ■ Alternative 3.Gothard Corridor Land Use Change(Gothard Corridor Alternative)—The Gothard Corridor Alternative assumes that all land uses within the Gothard Corridor are changed from the designation of Industrial to the new Research and Technology designation created under the General Plan Update. Under this alternative, approximately 146 additional acres of land designated as industrial under the proposed General Plan Update would be changed to the new Research and Technology land use designation. As a result of this land use change, new opportunities for high tech, research and development uses that do not involve heavy industrial uses would be allowed and promoted withinthe Gothard Corridor.It is anticipated that significant and unavoidable impacts identified under the General Plan Update due to greenhouse gas emissions and noise could increase as a result of the increase in vehicle trips and associated emissions. Therefore, the impact conclusion of significant and unavoidable would remain the same as identified for the General Plan Update. 3.4.1.1 Alternative 1: No Project The No Project Alternative assumes the implementation of the existing General Plan (1996), instead of the General Plan Update as proposed. Under this alternative,the existing General Plan land uses would remain in place and development within the city would occur as anticipated in a reasonable manner allowed by the goals and policies of the existing General Plan. The anticipated growth under this Alternative does not necessarily equate to the full buildout assumed atthe time of adoption of the existing General Plan (1996)but rather a lower level of growth that is reasonably forecast given existing conditions within the city of Huntington Beach, and based on the development projects of the 2013 Circulation Element as well as the goals and policies of the existing General Plan (1996). Development under the existing General Plan would increase residential development by 1,096 units when compared to buildout under the General Plan Update and result in a decrease in non-residential development potential when compared to non-residential buildout potential of the General Plan Update. Alternative 1 No:Projec4J:l Geriercai PI update fxisting:199G£general Plan Difference Residential 85,403 dwelling units ! 86,499 dwelling units +1,096 dwelling units _..,__.__-__._-,_'_______.-_---___. Non-Residential 50,410,990 square feet 45,748,000 square feet -4,662,990 square feet Based on these estimates, the majority of development anticipated to occur under the No Project Alternative would consist of residential development within specific plan areas(i.e.,Holly Seacliff Specific Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, etc.), as well as areas surrounding these specific plan areas. Thus, this alternative, which is required by CEQA, assumes that the existing General Plan and implementing zoning would remain unchanged.The existing General Plan would remain in effect, and no update to the existing General Plan goals and policies would occur. Aikins I City of Huntington Beach General Plan Jpdcle Program EIR —'— Page 15 August 2017 Item 10. - 22 HB -344- Fndings of,FactJStafement of Overriding Corj idi tions____,______ i od'!nga Under the No Project Alternative, development would continue as allowed under the 1996 General Plan and would result in an increase of 1,096 dwelling units above the General Plan Update and a total of 45,748,000 square feet of non-residential square footage, a reduction of 4,662,990 square feet as compared to the General Plan Update. The No Project Alternative would generally meet the objectives identified for the General Plan Update in that it would allow for land uses consistent with the existing character of the city and continue to provide sufficient infrastructure to meet demand. However,the No Project Alternative would not fully meet any of the objectives that will act as a catalyst to move the city into the coming decades, while creating investment in employment opportunities, transit investment and increased mobility by which to enjoy a more environmentally friendly and sustainable community. Further, the General Plan Update would provide a unified planning approach and specificdesign standards where future subsequent projects serve as independent pieces of the greater whole. Development under the No Project Alternative will be more of the same type of development and does not include key policies and land use changes necessary to spur employment and economic growth. The No Project Alternative will not fulfill the objectives Identified for the General Plan Update and while it will not generally result in impacts with a different level of significance, it will increase the severity of impacts within many of the topic areas (Population, Housing and Employment; Recreation; Utilities and Service Systems). 3.4.1.2 Alternative 2: Full Implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program (GGRP Alternative) As identified in Section 5.2 (Alternatives Considered but Rejected as Infeasible) of the FOR, the General Plan Update is anticipated to result in a significant and unavoidable impact due to the uncontrolled emission of greenhouse gases. In an effort to reduce the severity of this impact or avoid it entirely, the GGRP Alternative is proposed. Under this alternative, the City would implement the entirety of the draft GGRP, which is currently proposed as a voluntary program as part of the General Plan Update. Policy ERC-5A in the General Plan provides a target for Huntington Beach to reduce its total GHG emissions to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020, and 53.33% below the 2020 target by 2040, placing the community on a trajectory to match the state's long-term (2050) GHG reduction goals.As proposed,the draft GGRP contains a suite of strategies capable of reducing Huntington Beach's GHG emissions to levels at or below the following: ■ 2020 GHG reduction target 1,234,260 MTCO2e ■ 2040 GHG reduction target 575,990 MTCO2e As designed, this program proposes the reduction of GHG emissions within the city through a series of programs, initiatives, and activities that reduce GHG generation, sequesters GHG emissions, or offsets their production(i.e., use of alternative energy sources).While portions of the draft GGRP would likely be implemented alongside the General Plan Update, there would be no requirement to implement any specific measures, nor to incorporate a combination of measures that would result in a reduction of the greenhouse gases to a level that would be less than significant. ..............____...__._. Page 16 Gty of Huntington Beach General Plan update Program EIR I A3kins August 2017 HB -345- Item 10. - 23 3.0 Flndlns Resardinq Project ANemativeg Under this alternative, the draft GGRP would no longer be voluntary and instead would be a required implementation action and undertaken in its entirety, as part of approval of the General Plan Update. Based on the estimates provided in the draft GGRP,full implementation would reduce GHG emissions in both 2020 and 2040 timeframes to a less than significant level. Table 2 below identifies the estimated reductions. Tafsle 2 Draft,GGKP GHG Reciuct�on Esfirnafes _ 2040 MTCO2e 2040 MTCO2e 2020 MTCO2e 1 (No CCA) (CCA) ------------------------ Baseline emissions 1,452,070 1,452,070 1,452,070 Forecast with state and local accomplishments 1 1,308,690 1,101,020 1,102,850 -.._._-.__.�_._ Reduction target i T1,234,260 575,990 575,990 Gap between forecast and reduction target ; 74,430 525,030 526,860 Emissions with Draft GGRP 1,218,090 618,320 570,370 ------------------------------------ ------------------- --1------------------- -------------------------------- between Draft GGRP and reduction 16,170 42,330 5,620 target ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:------------------------ ------------------------_ Target met Yes No Yes As a result, the GGRP Alternative would eliminate one of the significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the General Plan Update. Findings Land use, associated assumptions regarding growth, identified mitigation measures and compliance with General Plan Update goals and policies of the GGRP Alternative would be implemented in a manner identical to the General Plan Update.The only change is that the draft GGRP shifts from being a voluntary set of strategies to reduce GHG emissions, to a required implementation action of the General Plan Update.As such the GGRP Alternative would accomplish the Project Objectives outlined in Section 3.3.2.2 of the Program E1R in the same manner as the General Plan Update but would have a greater benefit with regard to the project impact identified relating to GHG emissions and the potential achievement of State and regional GHG emissions targets through 2040.Implementation of the GGRP Alternative is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative. 3.4.1.3 Alternative 3: Gothard Corridor land Use Change (Gothard Corridor Alternative) As outlined in Section 5.2 (Alternatives Considered but Rejected as Infeasible) of the FEIR, the General Plan Update is anticipated to result in significant and unavoidable impacts to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gases (emissions) and Noise. While the impact to Air Quality identified in relation to the General Plan Update is based on the speculative nature of the programmatic level of the land use plan, the potential for impacts at a future project-level can be further reduced by a reduction in the intensity of land uses, and associated trip generation,criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.Furthermore,one of the comment letters received on the NOP published for the General Plan Update in 2015 related to the potential impacts due to noise, criteria pollutant emissions,and traffic generated by existing land uses in Atkins I Ci9yof Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR PageY17 August 2017 Item 10. - 24 KB -346- Rndings ot.Fact/Staterrrent of Ovemdin�Consderations._.__ the Gothard Corridor (specifically Republic Services). The comment letter went on to suggest that an expansion of the new Research and Technology land use designation proposed under the General Plan Update farther east along the Gothard Corridor could help to alleviate unsatisfactory existing conditions that include odors and other air quality issues, noise and traffic impacts,and related environmental justice issues. The letter also indicated that new heavy industrial uses would be concentrated in areas with existing Industrial land use designations that would remain Industrial under the General Plan Update, particularly along the eastern portion of the Gothard corridor, because they would no longer be allowed under the Research and Technology designation. While the project proposed under CEQA (the General Plan Update) and any project alternatives analyzed are not required to investigate the potential remediation or mitigation of existing conditions, to address the concerns of the comment letter, the Gothard Corridor Alternative is proposed for analysis. A change in development type and intensity can also change the potential for noise impacts, particularly those due to roadway noise as identified for the General Plan Update. This alternative has been developed in direct response to identified land use compatibility concerns regarding industrial land uses currently adjacent to residential and semi-public uses, including schools, within the Gothard Corridor. The intent of the Research and Technology land use designation is to promote the transformation of this corridor into an area focused on research and development,to attract businesses and jobs in the high technology services and manufacturing sectors and potentially reduce some of the environmental and quality of life impacts generated by existing uses today. Development of this alternative attempts to address some of the environmental justice concerns that have been raised in this area of the city. The Gothard Corridor Alternative assumes that all land uses within the Gothard Corridor are changed from the designation of Industrial to the new Research and Technology designation created under the General Plan Update. Under this alternative, approximately 146 additional acres of land designated as Industrial within the Gothard Corridor on the proposed General Plan Update land use map would be changed to the new Research and Technology designation. Figure 1 shows the areas of the city changed by the proposed alternative.' As a result of this land use change,new opportunities for development that do not involve heavy industrial uses would be allowed and promoted within the Gothard Corridor. However, this change would also increase the FAR to 1.0 under the Research and Technology land use designation,as compared to the 0.75 FAR allowed bythe Industrial land use designation.This change could increase the allowable development by approximately 990,000 square feet of non-residential uses within the Gothard Corridor. This increase in development potential is anticipated to result in a marked increase in trip generation within the Gothard Corridor and proximate areas. r The Traffic Analysis Zones(TAZs)affected by the Gothard Corridor Alternative include the folloWng: 102, 121, 123,and 135. _.__._____----------_.__._._._.___.___._.__---.-------------....____.._________._._._.__.____.___------_.-._.-.-._..._._._____.__._.____._._.___._._.....______.___________...___.___----------- Page 18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program£IR l Atkins August 2017 HB -347- Item 10. - 25 F"I" �c�rrx: L'iijid.kiu�t�r_E�ch fY+t7 FIGURE I Alternative 3, Gothard Corridor Land Use Change Alternative Atkins I City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR Page 19 August 2017 Item 10. - 26 HB -348- findings of Faci/Statement of _v_errirng Consldergtions ,__,_ M,i"al1Ing5 Land use, associated assumptions regarding growth,identified mitigation measures and compliance with General Plan Update goals and policies of the Gothard Corridor Alternative would be implemented in a manner identical to the General Plan Update.The only divergence from the General Plan Update would be the change in land use designation along the entire Gothard Corridor from Industrial to Research and Technology. Under the Gothard Corridor Alternative, the amount of land within in the planning area designated as Industrial would be reduced and changed to the Research and Technology land use designation (146 additional acres). As a result of the Gothard Corridor Alternative, it is anticipated that significant and unavoidable impacts identified under the General Plan Update due to greenhouse gas emissions and noise could increase as a result of the increase in vehicle trips and associated emissions. However, the impact conclusion of significant and unavoidable would remain the same as identified for the General Plan Update. While this alternative would achieve the majority of the objectives identified for the General Plan Update (as it is substantially similar to the General Plan Update), it would not achieve avoidance of any of the significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the General Plan Update and would increase the ADT across the planning area, potentially resulting in an additional significant impact to traffic. 3.4.1.4 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Evaluation Five additional land use alternatives were initially considered during the scoping and planning process but were not selected for detailed analysis in the Draft Program EIR.These included: Air Quality, Land Use, Noise, Utilities(Water Supply), and Reduced Development Intensity Alternative. Air Quality The significant air quality impacts that are identified as a result of the General Plan Update are the result of the speculative nature of estimating the emissions from individual projects.The quantity of emissions generated by a project varies depending on such aspects as its size, the land area that would need to be disturbed during construction, the length of the construction schedule, as well as the number of developments being constructed concurrently and in proximity to an individual project. Any variation of a long-term planning document, regardless of land use changes, would result in the same significant impacts due to the speculative nature of individual development projects.The only way to reduce these impacts would be on an individual project basis, as each of the identified and project-specific factors would be known and emissions could then be estimated accurately to determine whether they would exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Due to the programmatic and high-level nature of the land use plan and program,the General Plan Update cannot be considered as one project to support a feasible Alternative. As a result, an Alternative specific to the reduction of the identified air quality impacts was rejected as infeasible. -.----.--------.---__.__..__..___.v.v______.__...._..______.__._._._____.._..__...._._______.._-.._--..._--------------__-_.. ._-___,--__-____-._-_--...___.-__------.----._-----__- Page 20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR I Atkim August 2017 HB -349- Item 10. - 27 Aliemafiv_es Land Use During the General Plan Update process (including GPAC),several other areas of the city were assessed for potential changes to land use or enhancements to key intersections and/or developments.Two key areas that were considered by the City, but ultimately rejected, include the Peters Landing Opportunity area (consisting of Peter's Landing and adjacent parcels), located along the Pacific Coast Highway north of the Sunset Beach area, and the Southeast Opportunity Area,which included the Ascon Landfill, Plains tank farm, and AES power plant sites. Based on consideration and subsequent direction from the City Council, it was determined that land use changes in these areas were not preferred and no changes to land use are proposed as part of the General Plan Update. While the identification of these areas early in the General Plan Update process as key opportunity sites for achieving economic growth in the city could warrant further consideration for an alternatives analysis, these areas were already rejected by the decision makers from further consideration as part of the General Plan Update. In addition, land use changes for these areas would require increases In development density/intensity that are not likely to reduce any potential impacts when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. Noise Similar to the speculative nature of identified impacts far Air Quality,a significant and unavoidable impact due to roadway noise and groundborne vibration(during construction)were determined to be significant. With regard to roadway noise levels, community ambient noise levels would still increase substantially throughout the planning area by 2040. Because the increase in ambient noise levels would result from vehicle-related noise, a likely alternative that would reduce traffic levels enough to reduce noise levels due to roadway noise(based primarily on the location of existing residential uses)is not possible. With regard to groundborne vibration,while it has been determined that the location of vibration-heavy construction activities outside of 50 feet from a sensitive receptor would result in a less than significant impact, it is not possible to ensure that vibration-inducing activities could, in fact be located at such a distance in all cases. For example, in the Downtown area, where pile driving activities are necessary for subterranean parking structure construction,it may be necessary in the future to allow for vibration-heavy activities. Due to the uncertainty and the inability to prohibit such equipment,impacts in close proximity to sensitive receptors will remain significant and unavoidable. Further, any variation of a long-term planning document, regardless of land use changes, would result in the same significant impacts due to the speculative nature of individual development projects. As a result, an Alternative specific to the reduction of the identified groundborne vibration impacts was rejected as infeasible. Utilities / Water Supply Although the situation has improved within the latter part of 2016 and into the early parts of 2017, California continues to face a significant water crisis. Along with continued water reserve issues throughout the west and across California,delivery and reliability of water sources and supplies contin ues to be speculative.These conditions have prompted water suppliers,including Metropolitan,to review and continue to amend water supply projections, thus leaving less water available for jurisdictions than was previously assumed. The statewide supply situation is subject, and even likely, to change and over years, depending on precipitation, could return to a condition of normalcy and regular pumping. However, until that point in Atkins I Ciiy of Hunlington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR ' ' Page 21 August 2017 Item 10. - 28 H B -350- Endings of Fact/Statement of O�erriding_Considerations time, the water supply deficit and uncertainty exists regardless of implementation of the General Plan Update or other individual projects and due to the uncertainty regarding imported water supplies, the impacts would remain significant. As this is a condition across the state of California and not a result of the General Plan Update, an Alternative that would significantly increase water supply availability is not feasible. Therefore, an Alternative specific to the reduction of identified impacts to water supplies was rejected as infeasible. Reduced Development Intensity Alternative Over the period of development of the General Plan Update,a variety of information has been considered with regard to an alternative that would result in an overall reduced amount of development. This has ranged considerably, addressing discussions through the GPAC process as well as requirements of the MAND and the Housing Element, and aspirations of growth and organized future development within the city of Huntington Beach. To address reduction of significant and unavoidable impacts resulting from the General Plan Update as required under CEQA, further consideration of an alternative that reflected a reduced amount of development was undertaken.This included discussions of such reductions as an overall reduced amount of development (i.e., a reduction of a certain percentage across all residential and non-residential development) to address general objection to the General Plan Update, increased changes to the non- residential development land use designations to address comments received during GPAC and in response to the NOP released for the General Plan Update EIR,and reduction of residential development with the assumption that it would reduce traffic congestions perceived throughout the city. However, when these were considered,none provided substantially different or reduced environmental impacts to the more focused alternatives identified in Section 5.3 Alternatives Selected for Further Analysis. Further, as outlined by CEQA, any alternative analyzed must balance compliance with stated project objectives, social and economic benefits and detriments, and the feasibility of implementing such an alternative. In consideration of these potential alternatives, it was determined that the Full Implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program and Gothard Corridor land Use Change Alternatives would result in similar, if not more significant, reductions in the environmental impacts resulting from the General Plan Update and as such, another alternative with a proposed reduction in development intensity but with less focus and/or purpose would not be sensible, in alignment with project objectives, or supported by the arguments outlined in CEQA Section 15126.6(a) with regard to the selection of project alternatives. As such, analysis of a second alternative that addressed the potential reduction of development intensity under the General Plan Update was rejected as infeasible. As these five alternatives would not reduce or avoid additional significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the General Plan Update and would not better achieve any of the project objectives, they were not analyzed further. -----__.-------- ___ _.---._._._._._._.--------__._.---- Page 22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR I Atkins August 2017 HB -35 j- Item 10. - 29 4.0 Statement of Ovemdin Considerations 4.0 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 Introduction Section 15093 of the CEQA guidelines states: (a)CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects,the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." (b)When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the Final Program EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reason to support its actions based on the Final Program EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations,the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. The City of Huntington Beach proposes to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the significant cumulative air quality,cultural resource, GHG, noise, and utilities/water supply impacts of the General Plan Update. This section describes the anticipated benefits and other considerations of the General Plan Update to support the decision to proceed, even though significant and unavoidable impacts are anticipated. 4.2 Significant Adverse Cumulative Impact The City of Huntington Beach is proposing to approve the proposed project, with revisions to reduce environmental impacts, and has prepared a Draft Program EIR as required by CEQA. Even with revisions to the project,the following impacts have been identified as being unavoidable as there are no feasible mitigation measures available to further reduce the impacts. Refer to Chapter 2 (CEQA Findings) for further clarification regarding the impact listed below. Air Quality Project Specific Due to the speculative nature of estimating emissions from individual projects at the programmatic level of the General Plan Update, emissions cannot be quantified (as there is no project-level data)to establish whether the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)thresholds would be exceeded and the project would result in a significant and unavoidable air quality impact due to the violation of an air quality standard and exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Cumulative Due to the speculative nature of estimating emissions from individual projects at the programmatic level of the General Plan Update,emissions cannot be quantified (as there is no project-level data)to establish Atkins I City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR ^ Page 23 August 2017 Item 10. - 30 HB -352- Rndings of fact/Statement cf OveMdingConsiderollons__ whether the SCAQMD thresholds would be exceeded in a region deemed to be in nonattainment,and the project would result in a cumulative contribution to an air quality impact, resulting in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact to air quality. Cultural Resources Curnulative As it is currently infeasible to determine whether future development under the General Plan Update would result in demolition or removal of historical, archaeological and paleontological resources within the planning area, the incremental contribution of the General Plan Update to these cumulative effects could be cumulatively considerable and the General Plan Update would result in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact to cultural resources_ Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative The topic of GHG emissions is inherently a cumulative impact.While full implementation of the draft GGRP would reduce emissions below reduction targets, as the city of Huntington Beach is not bound by laws or regulations to implement the draft GGRP, there is no certainty that emissions would be reduced to necessary levels. Further, draft GGRP does not analyze GHG emissions associated with specific potential future development projects, and thus forecasted GHG emissions may differ substantially from actual future emissions when implementation of the General Plan Update begins. As such, the General Plan Update would result in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact due to the generation of GHG emissions and the potential conflict with an applicable plan. Noise Project Specific The General Plan Update would result in an increase in average daily trips (ADT) associated with future development, increasing ambient noise levels across the city due to roadway noise levels, some of which exceed established thresholds. As the increase in ambient noise levels is vehicle-related, there are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce ambient noise levels and exposure below the identified thresholds and the General Plan Update would result in a project-specific significant and unavoidable noise impact. Further, future development under the General Plan Update has the potential to generate construction vibration levels in exceedance of established thresholds at nearby sensitive receptors (i.e., those within 50 feet of piling activities). Although future development would comply with General Plan Policies N-4.A and N-4.D and implementation of mitigation measure MM4.10-5 would help to reduce impacts, construction vibration levels would not be reduced to a level that would be less than significant. Therefore, the General Plan Update would result in a project-specific (and temporary) significant and unavoidable impact due to construction vibration levels. -- --------- ---.....- - _.......-...._..._._...._......-....._._.--- ---.... .. ..--------------------------------- Page 24 Oty of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Program EIR I Afklns August 2017 HB -353- Item 10. - 31 ---,-,------------------.--------------------------------------._._.__.___._._.____._.___.__..-_-_—- -- 4.0 Statemenl of Qyerriding_Co-nsiderations Cumulative The General Plan Update would result in an increase in average daily trips (ADT) associated with future development,increasing ambient noise levels across the city due to roadway noise levels,some of which exceed established thresholds. As the increase in ambient noise levels is vehicle-related, there are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce ambient noise levels and exposure below the identified thresholds and the General Plan Update would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to noise levels in the region. As such, the General Plan Update would result in a significant and unavoidable cumulative noise impact. The project would expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels due to construction.The project would result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Utilities and Service Systems Project Specific Given the uncertainty of water supply across the western United States and throughout the state of California, a future supply deficit would result in a significant and unavoidable impact. Until such time as greater confidence in and commitment from water suppliers can be made,the General Plan Update would result in a significant and unavoidable project-specific impact. Cumulative As with the project-specific impact,given the uncertainty of water supply across the western United States and throughout the state of California,a future supply deficit would result in a significant and unavoidable impact. Until such time as greater confidence in and commitment from water suppliers can be made, the General Plan Update would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to water demand, result in a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. 4.3 Findings The City of Huntington Beach has evaluated all feasible mitigation measures and potential changes to the General Plan Update with respect to reducing the impacts that have been identified as significant and unavoidable(see Chapter 2,CEQA Findings).The City of Huntington Beach has also examined a reasonable range of alternatives to the project as proposed (see Chapter 3, Findings Regarding Project Alternatives). Based on this examination,the City of Huntington Beach has determined that the Full Implementation of the GGRP Alternative is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative. 4.4 Overriding Considerations Specific economic,social,or other considerations outweigh the significant and unavoidable impacts stated above.The reasons for proceeding with the proposed project, notwithstanding the identified significant and unavoidable impacts are described below. Atkins I Cify of Huniingion Beach General Plan Update Program EIR �! Page 25 Augusi X17 Item 10. - 32 HB -354- fndjr gs,ofFact/Statemento0 M_ rxonsiderations- f C -__ Proposed Project Benefits 1) Vision: The General Plan Update is a policy document, "guiding future development within the City of Huntington Beach as well as providing guidance to decision makers as they consider proposals for new development and site reuse through the planning horizon of 2040.The General Plan Update goals,policies,and implementation programs define a roadmap for new housing and job growth and provide guidance for decision makers on allocating resources and determining the physical form and character of development." 2) Economic Vitality: By introducing a new Research and Technology land use designation, the General Plan Update will provide for job growth, create additional flexibility for more jobs-rich future use of current industrial properties, while attracting a range of cleaner and greener businesses. 3) Infrastructure: To address the allocation of resources and to serve the potential increase in development, the General Plan Update will also provide a plan for updating water, sewer, drainage, street, and other infrastructure facilities through a comprehensive approach to adequately serve future growth while supporting the existing community. 4) Community Image: The General Plan Update will promote Huntington Beach's unique Surf City image, identity, and culture as a beach community while recognizing the desires of residents to remain an economically vibrant and attractive community with a level of growth balanced against the needs of the community. 5) Redevelopment through revitalization and innovation: The General Plan Update provides the ability for the City of Huntington Beach to revitalize commercial corridors and older industrial areas to allow for necessary economic development while supporting the attraction of innovative, clean,green and industry-forward companies to land and expand their business potential within the community. 6) Protection of residential land uses, particularly single-family residential: By focusing the development of non-residential development(including commercial and industrial) into areas of transformation within the City of Huntington Beach, long-established single family residential neighborhoods can remain protected from encroachment of non-residential uses. Further, the housing needs of the Orange County region and the City of Huntington Beach can be accommodated within consolidated areas developed with varied housing types, efficiently utilizing existing and enhanced infrastructure. This will maintain and enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of high quality development consistent with the existing character. 7) Mobility and Access:The General Plan Update will retrofit and enhance high-traffic corridors to better integrate cyclists, pedestrians, and transit users, with a move towards alternative modes of traditional transport(bus, rail, shuttle) as well as up-and-coming modes of transport such as alternative fuel vehicles. 8) Resource Conservation:With more organized development and guided use of existing resources, such potential impacts to water supply can be monitored and improved for the health and benefit of residents. Further, park lands and open spaces can be protected and retained in place throughout the planning horizon to provide recreational benefits to residents,visitors and school- aged students.A shifttoward sustainable resources and self-sufficiency,as outlined in the General Plan Update, will allow for the continuation of the valued way of life within the City of Huntington Beach throughout the planning horizon. ------------------------------_.._..__..._------_._.------------------------__-._ —----- Page 26 City of Hunfington Beach General Plan update Program EIR I Atkins August 2017 HB -355- Item 1.0. - 33 EXHIBIT B � P 8 .. x d 5 R. 111: ar _ ti fir-et az CU----I i1l� Wnt s d Eery F X5 Yp E,. MN: 7 Huntington Beach PUN � .� � �� •� a ®�• e im Huntington eachGENERAL j_ F fi3• CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN ADOPTED OCTOBER 2017 City Council General Plan Advisory Committee Barbara Delgleize, Mayor Dianne Thompson Mike Posey, Mayor Pro Tempore John Ventimiglia Patrick Brenden, Council Member Roy Miller Jill Hardy,Council Member Jeff Coffman Billy O'Connell, Council Member Robert Schaaf Erik Peterson, Council Member Dan Kalmick Lyn Semeta, Council Member Ed Pinchiff Planning Commission Kim Carr Connie Mandic, Chair John Scandura Bill Crowe,Vice-Chair Clem Dominguez Dan Kalmick, Commissioner Leslie Mayes John Scandura, Commissioner Jessica Budica Michael Grant,Commissioner Robert Sternberg Pat Garcia,Commissioner Ed Kerins Alan Ray, Commissioner Bob Wentzel Tim Mulrenan Sue Taylor Alan Walls Darrel P. Arnold City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) i Task Forces Pat Brenden Biological Resources Jack Kirkorn ' Vic Leipzig Dave Pryor Christine Whitcraft Tim McCormack Kim Kolpin Hemal Patel Sustainability Gordon Smith Teresa Howe Greg Hickman Tom Bock Lyle Ausk Circulation Keeli Scott Lisack Dan Kalmick Sue Gordon Janis Mantini Kim Nicholson Mark Sheldon Barbara Delgleize Ed Mountford Kathy Millea David Cicerone Dan Kalmick Michelle Schuetz Mike Posey Market Trends Pat Brenden John Ventimiglia John McGovern Tony Smale Philip Eddins Brett Barnes Steve Dodge City Staff Tom Grable Fred Wilson, City Manager Shawn Millbern Scott Hess,AICP,Community Development Director Sea Level Rise Jennifer Villasenor, Planning Manager Robert Schaff Hemal Patel Consultants to the City Gordon Smith Michael Baker International Jack Kirkorn In association with: Wes Warvi Atkins Global Mike Van Voorhis Moffatt & Nichol Robert Thompson Stantec Mark Bixby Stanley R. Hoffman Associates Ed Pinchiff Matrix Consulting Group Jennifer Thomas . F ii City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Table of Contents I. Introduction...............................................................................................................1-1 PlanOverview..............................................................................................................1-2 Whya General Plan?................................................................................................1-2 Geography....................................................................................................................1-2 Demographics..............................................................................................................1-3 Regulations...................................................................................................................1-3 California Government Code....................................................................................1-3 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy..........................1-4 California Environmental Quality Act........................................................................1-4 Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance............................................1-4 CaliforniaCoastal Act...............................................................................................1-4 PlanningArea...............................................................................................................1-5 CommunityEngagement..............................................................................................1-7 Community Vision and Guiding Principles...................................................................1-9 CommunityVision.....................................................................................................1-9 GuidingPrinciples.....................................................................................................1-9 GeneralPlan Elements..............................................................................................1-18 Plan Organization and Use........................................................................................1-20 II. Land Use...................................................................................................................2-1 Introduction and Purpose.............................................................................................2-1 Scopeand Content...................................................................................................2-2 Relationship to Other Elements................................................................................2-3 LandUse Plan..............................................................................................................2-4 CharacterizingLand Uses........................................................................................2-4 Distribution of Existing Uses.....................................................................................2-5 Characterof Change................................................................................................2-5 LandUse Map...........................................................................................................2-7 Land Use Designations ............................................................................................2-8 AdoptedSpecific Plans...........................................................................................2-15 CommunitySubareas.............................................................................................2-17 Distribution of Land Uses .......................................................................................2-23 DevelopmentCapacity ...........................................................................................2-24 UrbanDesign Plan.....................................................................................................2-26 Beach City Culture and Identity..............................................................................2-26 Fostering the Identity of Individual Neighborhoods and Districts..........................2-26 Accomodating Larger-Scale Development While Enhancing Character of Commercial Corridors.............................................................................................2-26 Maintaining Historic Character and Architectural Diversity in Downtown..............2-27 a Economic Development Plan.....................................................................................2-27 EconomicTrends....................................................................................................2-27 Economic Development Strategies.........................................................................2-29 Land Use and Urban Design Issues,Goals, and Policies.........................................2-32 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) iii Coordinating Development Patterns and Protecting Community Character.........2-32 Addressing Interactions Between Neighborhoods and Attractions .......................2-33 Providing a Range of Well-Maintained Housing Types .........................................2-34 Protecting and Adaptively Reusing Industrial Areas..............................................2-34 .� Maintaining Flexible Long-Term School Capacity .................................................2-35 Fostering the Identity of Individual Neighborhoods and Community Subareas ....2-36 Maintaining Historic Character and Architectural Diversity in Downtown..............2-36 Economic Development Issues, Goals, and Policies................................................2-37 Capitalizing on Location with Technology Infrastructure.......................................2-37 Retaining, Expanding, and Capturing Businesses.................................................2-38 Capturing Sales Tax Revenues..............................................................................2-38 Encouraging Renovation and Revitalization of Commercial and Industrial Areas ...........................................................................2-39 Adapting to a Changing Economy..........................................................................2-39 Enhancing Tourism and Hospitality........................................................................2-40 III. Circulation ...............................................................................................................3-1 Introduction and Purpose.............................................................................................3-1 Scopeand Content...................................................................................................3-2 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements .........................................................3-3 CirculationPlan ............................................................................................................3-3 MeasuringTraffic Flow.............................................................................................3-3 Land Use Plan and Forecasts..................................................................................3-5 RegionalMobility ......................................................................................................3-6 CompleteStreets......................................................................................................3-6 TheLocal Road System...........................................................................................3-7 Neighborhood Traffic Management........................................................................3-17 Public Transportation..............................................................................................3-18 Transportation Demand Management and Air Quality ..........................................3-20 Parking....................................................................................................................3-21 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Paths and Waterways..................................3-21 ScenicCorridors.....................................................................................................3-25 Transportation and Urban Runoff...........................................................................3-27 Issues, Goals, and Policies........................................................................................3-29 Maintaining Adequate Level of Service..................................................................3-29 Providing Adequate Downtown and Beach Parking..............................................3-30 Enhancing Regional Transit...................................................................................3-31 Increasing Local Transit Options............................................................................3-32 Ensuring Mobility Options for All Users..................................................................3-33 Enhancing Bicycle, Pedestrian, Equestrian, and Waterway Options....................3-33 Protecting Scenic Corridors....................................................................................3-34 Providing for Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Infrastructure.....................................3-35. Ensuring Access for Emergency Vehicles.............................................................3-36 IV. Environmental Resources and Conservation...............................................4-1 Introduction and Purpose.............................................................................................4-1 Scopeand Content...................................................................................................4-1 iv City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Relationship to Other Elements................................................................................4-2 OpenSpace Plan.........................................................................................................4-3 OpenSpace Diagram...............................................................................................4-3 .. Parksand Recreation...............................................................................................4-7 Coastal Recreation and Beach Management........................................................4-10 �. ConservationPlan......................................................................................................4-11 AirResources.........................................................................................................4-12 Greenhouse Gas Emissions...................................................................................4-14 Biological Resources..............................................................................................4-17 Energy Resources..................................................................................................4-22 Mineral Extraction Potential....................................................................................4-23 WaterResources....................................................................................................4-25 WaterQuality..........................................................................................................4-27 Issues, Goals, and Policies........................................................................................4-29 Meeting Parks and Facilities Needs.......................................................................4-29 Providing Recreation Programs and Services to Meet Community Needs...........4-30 Managing the Beach, Parks, and Recreation to Accommodate DiverseRecreational Needs...................................................................................4-31 Reducing Air Pollution ............................................................................................4-32 Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals..........................................................4-32 Identifying and Protecting Habitat Areas and Connections ...................................4-33 Protecting Habitat Resources in Wetlands ............................................................4-34 Protecting Coastal Habitat Resources...................................................................4-35 ProtectingTrees .....................................................................................................4-36 Protecting Habitats in Parks...................................................................................4-36 Conserving Energy in Homes and Businesses......................................................4-37 Expanding Renewable Energy Sources.................................................................4-37 Preserving Mineral Extraction Potential.................................................................4-38 Protecting and Conserving Water Resources........................................................4-39 Maintaining Water Quality......................................................................................4-40 V. Natural and Environmental Hazards.................................................................5-1 Introduction and Purpose.............................................................................................5-1 Scopeand Content...................................................................................................5-2 Relationship to Other Elements................................................................................5-2 Relationship to Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ..........................................................5-3 HazardsPlan................................................................................................................5-3 Geologic and Seismic Hazards................................................................................5-3 CoastalHazards.......................................................................................................5-9 Flooding ..................................................................................................................5-13 DamFailure ............................................................................................................5-13 UrbanFires................................................................................................................5-16 Hazardous Materials and Waste............................................................................5-16 . Aircraft/Airport Hazards..........................................................................................5-18 Disaster and Emergency Preparedness................................................................5-18 Issues, Goals, and Policies........................................................................................5-19 . Preparing for and Mitigating Geologic and Seismic Hazards................................5-19 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) v Preparing for a Changing Coastline.......................................................................5-20 Minimizing Flooding and Tsunami Hazards...........................................................5-21 Reducing Potential Urban Fire Risks.....................................................................5-21 Remediating Brownfield Sites ................................................................................5-22 Managing Hazardous Materials and Wastes.........................................................5-22 Reducing Potential Aircraft Hazards......................................................................5-23 Preparing Residents and Businesses for Future Disasters...................................5-23 _ Reducing Potential Threats to Homeland Security................................................5-24 VI. Noise.........................................................................................................................6-1 Introduction and Purpose.............................................................................................6-1 Scopeand Content...................................................................................................6-2 Relationship to Other Elements................................................................................6-3 NoisePlan....................................................................................................................6-3 MeasuringNoise.......................................................................................................6-3 Noise Sources and Concentration Areas.................................................................6-5 Noise Standards and Land Use Compatibility .........................................................6-8 Noise Contours and Impact Areas.........................................................................6-11 NoiseReduction Strategies....................................................................................6-15 Issues, Goals, and Policies........................................................................................6-18 Protecting Noise-Sensitive Land Uses...................................................................6-18 Ensuring Land Use/Noise Compatibility.................................................................6-18 Reducing Noise from Mobile Sources....................................................................6-19 Mitigating Noise from Construction, Maintenance, and Other Sources ................6-20 Vll. Public Services and Infrastructure..................................................................7-1 Introduction and Purpose.............................................................................................7-1 Scopeand Content...................................................................................................7-2 Public Facilities and Services Plan..............................................................................7-2 Police........................................................................................................................7-2 Fire, Marine Safety, and Emergency Medical Services...........................................7-4 Libraries ....................................................................................................................7-4 Community Services.................................................................................................7-5 Schools.....................................................................................................................7-5 Infrastructure Plan........................................................................................................7-5 Water Production and Distribution System..............................................................7-6 Wastewater Collection and Treatment.....................................................................7-6 Stormwater and Urban Runoff..................................................................................7-7 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal .......................................................................7-7 DryUtilities................................................................................................................7-8 Infrastructure Finance...............................................................................................7-8 Issues, Goals, and Policies..........................................................................................7-9 Providing Adequate Police Staffing and Facilities ...................................................7-9 Providing Adequate Fire, Marine Safety, and Emergency Medical Services........7-10 Transforming Libraries into Community Cultural Centers......................................7-11 Providing Social and Community Services............................................................7-12 Meeting Existing and Future Education Needs......................................................7-12 vi City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Maintaining Optimal Physical Condition of Water and SewerInfrastructure...............................................................................................7-13 _ Supporting Storm Drain System Upgrades and Maintenance...............................7-14 Improving, Replacing, and Funding Infrastructure.................................................7-14 -� Providing Solid Waste Collection and Disposal.....................................................7-15 Meeting Dry Utility Needs.......................................................................................7-16 Financing Public Services and Infrastructure.........................................................7-17 Vill. Implementation....................................................................................................8-1 Introduction...................................................................................................................8-1 ImplementationPrograms............................................................................................8-2 LandUse Element........................................................................................................8-3 City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs....................................................................8-3 Capital Improvements.............................................................................................8-11 Development Review Requirements......................................................................8-12 Interjurisdictional Coordination...............................................................................8-14 CirculationElement....................................................................................................8-15 City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs..................................................................8-15 CapitalImprovements.............................................................................................8-18 Development Review Requirements......................................................................8-20 Interjurisdictional Coordination ...............................................................................8-23 Ongoing Education and Outreach..........................................................................8-27 Environmental Resources and Conservation Element..............................................8-28 City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs..................................................................8-28 Capital Improvements.............................................................................................8-34 Development Review Requirements......................................................................8-37 Interjurisdictional Coordination...............................................................................8-40 Public Information and Outreach............................................................................8-43 Natural and Environmental Hazards Element...........................................................8-44 City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs..................................................................8-44 CapitalImprovements.............................................................................................8-47 Development Review Requirements......................................................................8-50 Interjurisdictional Coordination...............................................................................8-52 Public Information and Outreach............................................................................8-54 NoiseElement............................................................................................................8-56 City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs..................................................................8-56 CapitalImprovements.............................................................................................8-57 Development Review Requirements......................................................................8-57 Interjurisdictional Coordination...............................................................................8-59 Public Services and Infrastructure Element...............................................................8-60 City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs..................................................................8-60 CapitalImprovements..............................................................................................8-65 Development Review Requirements......................................................................8-66 . Interjurisdictional Coordination...............................................................................8-67 Public Information and Outreach............................................................................8-68 t City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) vii List of Figures Figure 1-1 Huntington Beach Planning Area....................................................................1-6 Figure LU-1 Character of Change...................................................................................2-6 --- Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan.............................................................................................2-9 Figure LU-3 Adopted Specific Plans..............................................................................2-16 Figure LU-4 Land Use Subareas...................................................................................2-18 Figure CIR-1 Typical Roadway Cross Sections..............................................................3-9 Figure CIR-2 Arterial Highway Plan...............................................................................3-14 Figure CIR-3 Proposed MPAH Amendments................................................................3-15 Figure CIR-4 Bus Route Map........................................................................................3-19 Figure CIR-5 Bikeway Plan............................................................................................3-23 Figure CIR-6 Bikeway Cross Sections..........................................................................3-24 Figure CIR-7 Scenic Highway Plan...............................................................................3-28 Figure ERC-1 Open Space Diagram...............................................................................4-4 Figure ERC-2 Park Locations and Service Areas...........................................................4-9 Figure ERC-3 Natural and Urbanized Communities.....................................................4-18 Figure ERC-4 Established Habitat Areas......................................................................4-21 Figure ERC-5 Mineral Resource Zones........................................................................4-26 Figure HAZ-1 Regional Fault Map...................................................................................5-5 Figure HAZ-2 Local Faults...............................................................................................5-6 Figure HAZ-3 Seismic Hazard Zones (Liquefaction and Landslide)...............................5-7 Figure HAZ-4 Subsidence...............................................................................................5-8 Figure HAZ-5 Tsunami Evacuation Map.......................................................................5-10 Figure HAZ-6 Potential Sea Level Rise Hazard Areas (2050)......................................5-12 Figure HAZ-7 Flood Hazard Areas................................................................................5-14 Figure HAZ-8 Dam Flooding Areas...............................................................................5-15 Figure HAZ-9 Methane Hazard Overlay Districts..........................................................5-17 Figure N-1 Modeled Noise Contours for Baseline Year 2014.......................................6-13 Figure N-2 Anticipated Changes in 2040 Noise Levels................................................6-14 Figure PSI-1 Public Facility Locations.............................................................................7-3 viii City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) List of Tables Table LU-1 General Plan Distribution of Land Uses.....................................................2-24 Table LU-2 General Plan Development Capacity.........................................................2-25 Table CIRC-1 Peak Hour Level of Service Descriptions for Intersections.....................3-4 Table CIRC-2 Roadway Characteristics by Type..........................................................3-12 Table CIRC-3 Summary of Scenic Corridor Development Requirements....................3-26 Table ERC-1 Open Space Land Uses............................................................................4-5 Table ERC-2 Huntington Beach 2005 and 2012 GHG Emissions................................4-15 Table ERC-3 Huntington Beach 2020 and 2040 GHG Emissions................................4-16 Table ERC-4 Natural and Urbanized Communities Occurring within the Huntington BeachPlanning Area...........................................................................................4-19 Table ERC-5 Habitat Areas...........................................................................................4-20 Table ERC-6 Current and Forecasted Energy Use......................................................4-22 Table ERC-7 City of Huntington Beach Planned Water Retail Demand (2020-2040) ........................................................................................................4-25 Table ERC-8 2010 California 303(d) and TMDL Priority...............................................4-28 Table N-1 Changes in Sound Pressure Levels, dB........................................................6-4 Table N-2 Land Use-Noise Compatibility Standards ......................................................6-9 Table N-3 Sample Interior Noise Control Measures.....................................................6-17 3 ' F City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) ix This page is intentionally left blank. x City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) I. The Introduction �*. .�„• �� . ,;,ice z'a The City of Huntington Beach has enjoyed a unique and rich history in its first century. Since 1909, the city has grown in land area, population, employment, transportation, and opportunity. Throughout this time, the highly coveted natural features and resources integral to the city's identity have been protected. Formerly an agriculture-based community, the city is now home to a variety of employment opportunities in the tourism, industrial, professional office, and healthcare sectors. Today, Huntington Beach is known for its pristine beaches, diverse family-friendly community, and renowned Downtown. The city attracts millions of visitors from around the world, who enjoy the weather, recreation, events, and shopping. While experiencing steady population and economic growth, the city continues to meet the challenge of preserving its beach city culture and identity, protecting its natural resources, and enhancing quality of life for all community members. The General Plan serves as a blueprint for the community through the year 2040. The plan provides a roadmap for new housing and job growth, while protecting those �41 characteristics and values that make Huntington Beach a desirable and distinctive place �? to live, work, and visit. 4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-1 Plan Overview This overview of the General Plan describes Huntington Beach's geography and key demographic trends. Why a General Plan? The General Plan is a state-required policy document that provides guidance to City decision-makers on allocating resources and determining the future physical form and character of development. It is the City's official statement about the extent and types of development needed to achieve community physical,economic,and environmental goals. The General Plan consists of individual chapters,or"elements,"each of which addresses a specific topic. It also embodies a comprehensive and integrated approach to planning. The General Plan clarifies and articulates the City's intentions with respect to the rights and expectations of the general public, property owners, community groups, developers, and businesses. KEY FACTS cieography • Area of City: 27.3 square miles' The City of Huntington Beach is located in the • Population: 193,1892 northwestern portion of Orange County along the Pacific Ocean. The city is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the Housing: 78,17 southwest, the City of Seal Beach to the northwest, the units' City of Westminster to the north, the City of Fountain , Average Household Valley to the northeast, and the Cities of Newport and Size: 2.62 persons' Costa Mesa to the east. • Population Density: Huntington Beach's defining coastline, scenic viewsheds, 7,179 inhabitants per and diverse neighborhoods create a unique sense of square mile place and quality of life. The community provides a Jobs:81,013 jobs4 distinctive mix of coastal resources, protected open spaces, distinct residential neighborhoods, high-quality Sources: services, shopping opportunities, and a longstanding 1)Caliit orniaDpart Beaetr�"a14 Pp 9 pP 9 9 2)Catr#orniaE}epartmento# commitment to environmental stewardship. Finance2t714 3)2010-2014 American'. Community Survey From its early origins as a stop along the Pacific Electric 4)StanleyR,Hot#manAssociates r Railway corridor to recent and possible future 2016 annexations, Huntington Beach has a long history of leveraging the economic and environmental advantages of its physical location and building on surrounding resources. 1-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Demographics While Huntington Beach has experienced modest population growth over the past several decades, ongoing demographic and household trends indicate that the population will continue to gradually increase over the next several decades. Furthermore, Huntington Beach's age profile is shifting from a younger to a more mature population. The number of young adults (25-44 years) has decreased over the past decade, while the number of middle-aged adults (45-64 years) and seniors (65+ years) has increased. In 2014, Huntington Beach had a population of 193,189 and 78,175 total housing units. The average household size from 2000 to 2014 increased from 2.56 to 2.62 persons per household. The total employment in Huntington Beach was estimated at 81,013 in 2015. Total employment is projected to increase by 15.3 percent between 2015 and 2040 and strong evidence suggests that the rate of new housing unit construction will continue to increase as well. This General Plan provides development capacity for approximately 17,862 additional residents and 12,386 additional jobs by 2040. The plan identifies how community amenities, services, and infrastructure will be provided to accommodate this planned growth, while maintaining community character and culture, conserving important resources,and adapting to changing economic and environmental conditions. Regulations A number of key state, regional, and local regulations set requirements that the General Plan must fulfill. California Government Code Each city and county in California is required to adopt a general plan and update this plan at regular intervals. Sections 65300-65404 and 65590-65590.1 of the California Government Code establish the requirements for the minimum contents of the general plan and rules for adoption and subsequent amendments. Together, state law and judicial decisions establish three overall guidelines for general plans. General plans should be: Comprehensive. This requirement has two aspects. First, the general plan must be geographically comprehensive. Second, the general plan must address the full range of issues that affect the city's physical development. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-3 Internally consistent. The general plan must fully integrate its separate parts and relate them to each other without conflict. All adopted portions of the general plan have equal weight, whether required by state law or not. Long range. State law requires every general plan take a long-term perspective since anticipated development will affect the city and the people who live or work here into the foreseeable future. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy: Towards a Sustainable Future provides a comprehensive outline of the regional vision for transportation investments in Southern California through 2040. The RTP was adopted in 2017 and is updated every four years to address regional transportation needs. The General Plan should be consistent with these regional planning efforts. California Environmental Quality Act The state legislature adopted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in response to a public mandate for thorough environmental analysis of projects that could affect the environment. The provisions of the law and environmental review procedures are described in the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21189). A separate Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the General Plan is the instrument for ensuring that environmental impacts of the plan are appropriately assessed and mitigated. Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance The City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (Huntington Beach Municipal Code Title 20-Title 25) is the primary implementation tool for the General Plan. The Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance consists of two parts: the official Zoning Map divides the city into zones consistentwith General Plan land use designations, and zoning text establishes development standards for each zone including permitted uses, density and intensity of uses, building height, performance standards, and other similar regulations. California Coastal Act The California Coastal Act(California State Public Resources Code, Division 20, Section 30000 et seq.)directs each local government lying wholly or partly within the coastal zone, as defined by the Coastal Act, to prepare a Local Coastal Program for its portion of the 1-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) coastal zone. Local Coastal Programs are prepared so that local governments can carry out the policies and requirements of the Coastal Act. Local Coastal Programs must be reviewed and certified by the California Coastal Commission before being implemented by a local government. The City of Huntington Beach has a certified local coastal program, which is divided into two components: (1) a Coastal Element and (2) an Implementation Program. The Coastal Element includes a land use plan and goals and policies to be used by decision-makers when reviewing coastal-related issues and proposed development within the coastal zone boundary. The Huntington Beach Coastal Element was initially certified by the California Coastal Commission in 1985 and was last comprehensively updated in 2001. Pianning Area The General Plan addresses all land within the city limits,as well as unincorporated Orange County properties surrounded by Huntington Beach, including the Bolsa Chica Wetlands. These areas are located within Huntington Beach's sphere of influence (SOI). While properties outside the city limits are under the jurisdiction of Orange County,they are critical to Huntington Beach's planning activities, resource conservation, and overall community value.The city and SOI comprise the"planning area"as illustrated in Figure 1-1. The planning area encompasses 29.6 square miles (18,971 acres)on the western edge of Orange County, located 37 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles. Land within the current city limits (including the Huntington Beach Municipal Pier) comprises 27.3 square miles (17,482 acres), or 92 percent of the planning area, while unincorporated areas comprise 2.3 square miles (1,489 acres),or 8 percent of the planning area. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) "' 1-5 m City of E City'of Seat Beach m m Westminster r7 + 801sa Ave m $ McFadden � m AV- z Edinger Ave Nurrq tow- NarboFtr: HeItAve 65 h City Of Fountain Malley rn v Ave.'. O SiaterAve �o ��c Salb ertq� TaibertAve $ / Egis m y 4ti j� i..- Ave 2 m' to S "3 Garfield Ave' 9� / Yorktown Ave' q /AdamsAve 0 f ga d Indianapolis Ave l' A ianb Ave ItHerniRon Ave 4- Funning Ave LEGEND `Qca Q City Of Planning Area � �` 5� Nan-Incorporated Land F, Costa Mesa��. /=f Within Planning Area + moo �*- City Limits 0 a5 1 wl F. l 1 I s MLES 8aesmep Scurte:City.Huebrgm aee (2014} t7B Beam ^. Huntington Beach Planning Area Figure 1-1 I : 1-6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Community Engagement Community engagement provides opportunities for input from residents, property owners, businesses, and concerned stakeholders. This feedback helps the City make quality decisions to create a more livable community. Updating the General Plan provided many opportunities for participants to help guide the future of Huntington Beach.The City invited the entire community to participate in a process of visioning, planning for the future, and reviewing the draft plan. The community engagement process helped define a community vision and widely shared guiding principles, but also exposed issues and opportunities, which informed the planning process.Community engagement activities conducted during the General Plan update included the following: General Plan Advisory Committee. The General Plan y Advisory Committee (GPAC) was N created to provide input on the overall General Plan update process. The GPAC consisted of ' twelve community members and alternates: representatives from the Chamber of Commerce, Community Services Commission, Environmental Board, Planning Commission, and Public Works Commission, and seven members appointed by City Council members. The GPAC met seven times over a one-year period, providing input on community themes and key issues,the community vision and guiding principles,technical reports, potential transformation areas and land use alternatives, and General Plan goals and policies. .s 1 Fsj City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-7 Community Workshops and Open House. The City conducted community-wide workshops during the initial visioning phase of the project. The City hosted a beach bonfire, two community visioning workshops, and a pop-up workshop. The purpose of these workshops was to set a framework for future engagement on focused policy discussions in a transparent and collaborative way and to gather input on current priorities, issues, concerns, and a vision for the future. City staff also presented General Plan concepts to a number of community groups throughout the update process. During the public review phase of the General Plan update, the document was posted on the City's General Plan update website(www.hbthenextwave.org)and advertised through the City's website,social media platforms (e.g., Facebook,Twitter), the Huntington Beach Wave newspaper, and the email distribution list gathered during the project. Community-Wide Online Surveys. Community members participated in three online surveys throughout the course of the General Plan update. During the visioning phase of the project, community members described the demographics, preferences, and habits of the Huntington Beach community to help inform current and future community needs and wants. During the policy development phase, participants shared feedback regarding the draft guiding principles and potential transformation areas. During the draft plan review phase, participants shared feedback,questions,and concerns regarding the draft General Plan. Throughout this process, the City shared feedback from these surveys with the GPAC, Planning Commission, and City Council to maximize transparency. Stakeholder Interviews.The City interviewed 16 stakeholders during the initial visioning phase of the project to capture a broad range of perspectives.Stakeholders were involved leaders in the community related to current planning processes, resource efficiency, circulation, market trends and fiscal considerations, resource conservation and wetland protection, land use, and social services. Stakeholders included City Council members, Planning Commissioners, existing and former City staff, business owners, civic organization leaders, Chamber of Commerce members, and neighborhood advocates. Meetings with Community Groups.The City gave presentations to City and community groups to provide an overview of the General Plan purpose and process.The meetings also provided an opportunity for community group members to share their input. City staff met with homeowners, businesses, and environmental groups over the course of the update. General Plan Website.A General Plan website provided access to background materials, information on the process,and progress of the project for easy reference. This website was the main access pointfor community members to participate in online surveys,access publicly available information and documents,and submit comments and questions to City staff. 1-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Community Vision A community vision is a long-term aspiration describing what a community wants to achieve in the future. Put simply, it describes the ideal condition of Huntington Beach in 2040, and outlines the factors that will sustain long-term community character and values over time. The Community Vision was crafted by the GPAC,City staff, and the consulting team, based on the input provided by the community during the community engagement process.This was reviewed by the City Council early in the General Plan update process. The City's Community Vision represents a summary of the future aspirations underlying the General Plan. In 2040, the City of Huntington Beach is... a desirable destination for all people to live,work,play,and visit, Huntington Beach is a healthy and safe, family-oriented community With flourishing schools and accessible community services for all age's. Natural' resources are protected,, while parks, open spaces, and the beach_ provide a variety of recreation opportunities. Community members travel easily by utomobile, by bicycle,on foot, and using transit. Well-maintained, high-quality infrastructure and cutting-edge technology help all businesses throughout the city prosper in a culture of innovation,offering a variety' of job opportunities for residents and the region. Development is guided to ensure responsible growth while preserving and enhancing our community character, the beach, Surf City culture, and the environment.— The community and its priorities are,resilient, withstanding the challenges posed by a changing coastline and economic`base, and shifting demographics. The City, in partnership with the community,l is sustainable—considering the needs of future generations while protecting what is valued today.' Guiding Principles Guiding principles help to achieve the community's vision. They provide a foundation for General Plan goals and policies and offer guidance to the City Council,City commissions, and staff for making future decisions. The following principles, supporting the Community Vision, are intended to guide future City decision making. The guiding principles were created through the GPAC's work and , reviewed by the City Council early in the General Plan update process and provide an F FE H, 4,t A City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-9 overarching rationale for more specific General Plan i�il�ui it goals and policies. Each principle is supported by a newspaper-style headline submitted by workshop participants,followed by a description of the community Huntington Beach wants to be in 2040 while underscoring both challenges and opportunities. u Quotes from the community engagement process r accompany the guiding principles and describe what fl workshop participants cherish about Huntington Beach and what they want for Huntington Beach in the future. Projects supporting these guiding principles will be pursued over the 25-year time frame of the General ,h Plan, subject to available funding. Economic Vitality Local Businesses Thrive in an Innovation-Friendly Environment Our local businesses are a top choice for highly qualified job seekers, and Huntington Beach is a place that businesses want to come to. Innovation and workforce diversity are creating high-paying jobs in the community. New businesses and jobs have emerged in areas capable of providing technology and infrastructure specifically to support business start-ups, allowing for smooth transition into larger spaces as businesses expand. The variety of building and development platforms provided to businesses in Huntington Beach makes the community resilient to future economic changes. Consistent and predictable development standards support businesses in their efforts to start or expand, minimizing commercial vacancy in the community. Local attractions, such as the beach, accommodations, and amenities, draw tourists from near and far, while improved housing and transportation options support the servicesector upon which Huntington Beach's tourist economy relies. a., x T s N� a3 1-10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Infrastructure Funds Flow Toward Improved Infrastructure Systems Water, sewer, street, and other infrastructure facilities are updated to serve future generations of residents, businesses, and visitors. New infrastructure projects are coordinated using a comprehensive systems approach, supporting existing community members and providing adequate capacity for future growth. A vibrant economy, expanded tax base, and sustainable infrastructure investments result in improved neighborhood quality and increased property values throughout Huntington Beach.The City and community groups are successful in seeking grant funding to support community infrastructure objectives. Open Space and Recreation Residents Don Have to Travel Far to Play Outside Both open space and recreational activities are highly valued. Residents and visitors cherish the beach, parks, trails, wetlands, and recreational activities available throughout the community. A careful balance between recreational structures, amenities, and activities is maintained. The beach is accessible, open, and clean, and natural open spaces have been managed carefully to accommodate varying preferences and changing priorities. The City continues to successfully partner with regional agencies, Golden West College, local school districts,conservation organizations, and community groups to plan for parks, share facilities, and conserve resource areas. . 1 lei City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-11 Surf City Community Image Huntington Beach Voted Most Family-Friendly City in Califomia The beach community and Surf City culture are among the most cherished assets of Huntington Beach for locals and visitors alike. The beach, surfing, and related activities endure as part of the community's image and identity. The City and community organizations partner to preserve historic and cultural resources related to that identity, such as older neighborhoods and historic Downtown buildings. Surf City events and community art are promoted throughout the community to retain Huntington Beach's unique feel and culture. celebration of the surfing, outdoor '7 like the small-town yr, f 3 y. � ail 61 r i9 h feel of Huntington Beach. 1-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Public Safety Huntington Beach Celebrates Top-Notch Public Safety Ratings The City promotes public safety as an important part of maintaining a high quality of life in Huntington Beach. Community members and visitors feel safe and secure living and playing here. The community is prepared for catastrophic events such as earthquakes, tsunamis, and flooding. Street lighting and design are enhanced in public areas, open spaces, and parks, and along streets and boulevards, improving the community's sense of safety. An increased police presence in some areas, particularly neighborhoods, Downtown, and the beach, leads to fewer incidents and safer community events. • f • f R. f ' f ff fff J , • • • Q�r "� 'IPA �E @gg IF •� • f g. ibigll 9,I�bv B Ig .x Redevelopment and Revitalization Responsible Growth Is Accommodated to Maintain Community Character Commercial corridors and older industrial areas are revitalized to support economic development. Downtown is thriving and safe, and successful infill projects enhance our community. A cautious and thoughtful approach has avoided land use conflicts and balanced the need for growth with the desire to maintain the community scale enjoyed by residents. A diverse array of housing types,with a mix of densities, is available to provide Huntington Beach residents with a full range of housing opportunities. The housing supply matches diverse population and workforce needs, supporting the city's economic base. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-13 Mobility and Access Biking, Walking, and Transit Use Rates Reach All-Time Highs Bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users are a priority on roadways, and it is easy and pleasant to reach goods and services,as well as parks and recreation resources, by bike or on foot. High-traffic corridors are retrofitted to better connect cyclists and walkers,and to support use of alternative fuel vehicles. Downtown streetscape improvements enhance the pedestrian experience, create additional community gathering places, and provide valuable space for events. Community members and visitors do not experience traffic congestion along high-traffic corridors. Expanded regional transit connections provide links between the beach and the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), resulting in improved access and mobility for residents and visitors, reduced traffic congestion, and accessible parking in the community. i Ar' r t x �' UV b> iqV 1-14 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Resource Conservation Blue Ocean Meets Green City Huntington Beach is a regional leader in sustainability, taking steps to conserve and protect natural resources within the community. The beach and wetland areas are protected and valued by residents and visitors. Water is a valued resource that the community conserves while also seeking additional and alternative sources. The community has shifted to renewable energy resources and conservation practices. Support for local businesses to develop new technologies leads to the use of these technologies to support further conservation and sustainability. Continued relationships with and support for nonprofit organizations promote natural resource protection and enhance community pride in our clean, healthy, and vibrant resources. Efficient land use patterns and resilient design strategies minimize exposure to natural hazards, including rising sea levels. t zt h � r : s f City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-15 Resident Services City Reaches Every Resident Through Expanded Community Services and Programs Community and social services are updated and expanded to meet the needs of all community members, including youth and seniors.Through efforts to collaborate with local schools, community-based organizations, and City departments, these community services are accessible and open to all residents. Youth in the community have access to the same caliber of education or extracurricular programs as adults. Young adults find a range of employment, continuing education, and entertainment options in the community. Senior and elderly residents benefit from additional and accessible social services meeting their needs, and the senior center successfully provides a venue and forum for seniors to access services. VI A s f N 1-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Culture and Arts Cultural Opportunities Abound New venues for arts, entertainment, and cultural activities elevate our reputation as a regional hub for culture and the arts.The expansion of cultural activities and events serves an important role in promoting the efforts of local artists, providing educational opportunities for our community's youth, and diversifying the activities and amenities available to visitors. Huntington Beach will continue to recognize and appreciate its history and cultural heritage by supporting programs, activities, and facilities that celebrate our heritage. PR V, City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-17 General Plan Elements The General Plan provides direction regarding many different development and conservation topics, organized by elements. These elements address all state-mandated topics plus additional topics of local importance. The plan format combines related topics in a concise,easy-to-read format that describes how the City will achieve the Community Vision in a manner consistent with the guiding principles. The Land Use Element guides future development and designates appropriate locations for different land uses including open spaces, parks, residences, commercial uses, industry, schools,and other public and community-serving uses. The Land Use Element establishes standards for residential density and nonresidential building intensity for lands within the planning area. The element also establishes the City's long-term community design and economic development goals related to beach city culture and identity, community form, neighborhoods and districts,economic trends, and job development and retention strategies. The Circulation Element defines the transportation network and describes how people move throughout the planning area, including the streets, railways,transit routes, bicycle paths, and sidewalks.The transportation network is a major determinant of development form and land use. Factors such as, but not limited to, traffic patterns and congestion, access to transit, and ease and safety of walking and biking may determine where people choose to live, work,and visit. The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element describes the conservation, development, and use of natural resources(including open space), as well as parks and recreation opportunities, in Huntington Beach. This element also addresses key issues related to environmental resources and conservation, including biological resource areas, energy and water conservation, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and coastal resources. The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element identifies areas prone to natural hazards and potentially hazardous conditions including ground shaking and surface rupture from earthquakes; ground failure; tsunami, seiche, and dam failure; slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides; subsidence, liquefaction, and other geologic hazards;flooding; urban fires; hazardous materials; and evacuation routes. r The Noise Element describes the existing noise environment in Huntington Beach, identifies noise sources and problems affecting community safety and comfort, and establishes policies and programs that limit community exposure to excessive noise levels.The Noise Element sets standards for acceptable noise levels by various land uses 1-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) and provides guidance for how to balance the noise created by an active and economically healthy community with the community's desire for peace and quiet. The Public Services and Infrastructure Element describes the water delivery system, wastewater collection and treatment system, stormwater and urban runoff, solid waste disposal, electricity, communications, and infrastructure finance. This element also identifies plans for preparing for health and safety hazards, including police protection, fire protection, marine safety,emergency response and preparedness, and airport safety. The Historic and Cultural Resources Element identifies important local cultural, archaeological, and historic resources and establishes goals, policies, and actions for the protection and preservation of those resources. The Housing Element serves as a policy guide to address community housing needs. The element outlines the housing needs of the community, the barriers or constraints to providing that housing, and actions proposed to address these housing-related concerns pursuant to state housing element law (Government Code Section 65584). The Coastal Element addresses the requirements of the California Coastal Act within the portions of Huntington Beach located in the coastal zone. Goals and policies in this element guide civic decisions regarding growth, development, enhancement, and preservation of coastal resources.The Coastal Element is part of the City's Local Coastal Program. Measure M, approved by Orange County voters in 1990, requires all jurisdictions within the county to maintain a Growth Management Plan and a seven-year Capital Improvement Program. Measures M and M2, approved in 2006, raise the County's sales tax until 2041 to pay for specific voter-approved transportation projects. Local jurisdictions may receive tax monies for approved local projects if their Growth Management Plan and Capital Improvement Program conform to measure requirements. The City's Growth Management Plan is addressed by the Land Use and Public Services and Infrastructure Elements. 4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1-19 Pian organization and tse What is the focus and purpose of the element?What are the trends Huntington for each topic?What are the community issues? ISS' Beach each General PlanWhat are the desired outcomes? Plan ri di What is the course of action to acheive the desired outcomes? �i¢$ How will the City implement the plan? ° e' The Introduction and Purpose section of each element describes the purpose and scope of the element, and specifies the relationship of each element to other elements in the General Plan. The Plan section provides important background information and key trends that provide a strategic basis for City policy. Many of the elements illustrate various opportunities, constraints, classifications, policies, and standards in either graphic or tabular form. For example, the Land Use Element contains a Land Use Map and a Land Use Plan that identify and describe the locations of future uses by type, density,and intensity. The Issues, Goals, and Policies sections identify the most important community issues related to the element topic. For each issue,goals set direction by stating a desired future end state. Policies are guides for the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff when reviewing development proposals and making other decisions that affect future development and conservation. Policies represent a commitment by the City to pursue a particular course of action,or to take action in the future consistentwith the direction stated in the related goal. Policies are presented as written statements, tables, diagrams, and maps. All of these components must be considered together when making planning decisions. Implementation Programs describe how the City will implement identified goals and policies. Unless otherwise stated, all policies are to be implemented on an as-appropriate or as-feasible basis, considering surrounding physical and environmental context and financial resources. These implementation programs are located in Chapter VIII. m� Implementation. `. The organization of this General Plan allows for users to identify the sections that interest t them and quickly obtain a sense of the City's policies on those subjects. However, plan users should realize that the policies in various elements are interrelated and examine them collectively. 1-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) II. Land use NN"', Introduction and Purpose zr 4.• . .w.�wuvwry �wj✓.. z c e The fundamental pattern of Huntington Beach is set,as most of the land in the community is already developed or planned for a future use. However,communities are ever-evolving, and change, growth, and refinement can still be encouraged and cultivated. Land use is often considered the most overarching topic within a general plan, as it affects every other subject covered and directly influences the availability of housing and services, neighborhood and community character, economic stability, and quality of life for community members. By both focusing investment and embracing opportunity, Surf City can continue to thrive and expand into the future. x City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-1 Scope and Content California Government Code Section 65302(a) requires the City to adopt a Land Use Element that designates the proposed general distribution, location, and extent of land uses for housing, business, industry, open space, forest/timber, agriculture, natural resources, recreation,scenic beauty, education, public buildings and land, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other public and private uses of land. The Land Use Element also establishes standards for residential density and nonresidential building intensity for designated land uses, and considers the impact of new growth on military readiness activities carried out on military facilities. Although the planning area does not contain any active military facilities, military facilities are located in the City of Seal Beach adjacent to the planning area's northern boundary. Land uses described in this element do not conflict with any military readiness activity associated with these facilities. The Land Use Map is the visual component of the element, illustrating how land use, urban design, and economic development goals and policies translate on the ground, where specific uses are allowed, and their intended density and intensity. Together, the Land Use Map and Element ensure that future development is balanced, effective, and consistent with City and community interests. The Land Use Element also addresses two related topics inherently related to land use decisions undertaken by the City: urban design and economic development. These are optional general plan topics under California law. Section 65303 of the California Government Code enables a county or city to adopt "any other elements or address any other subjects, which, in the judgment of the legislative body, relate to the physical development of the county or city."Any optional topics or elements must be consistent with the seven mandatory elements and, once adopted, they carry the same legal weight as any of the mandatory topics or elements. The Land Use Element consists of this Introduction and Purpose,summarizing the general purpose of the Land Use Element; a Land Use Plan that defines land use standards and identifies the location and extent of land uses within the planning area; an Urban Design Plan outlining the fundamental components of community form in Huntington Beach; an Economic Development Plan recommending economic development strategies to sustain community character and economic vitality; Issues, Goals, and Policies outlining the most important land use, design, and economic issues affecting the planning area and policies to address these issues; and Implementation Programs describing how tools proposed to address land use issues are out into practice. Implementation programs are contained in a separate chapter at the conclusion of this General Plan. 2-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Relationship to Other Elements The Land Use Element affects every other element in the General Plan. Land use provides the basis for what uses are allowed where and in what shape and form. The Land Use Element lays out how uses are connected to ensure the Circulation Element provides for adequate transportation that meets the demands of current and future development. Likewise, the existing and planned transportation network can play a key factor in the economic success,safety,and character of specific land uses. The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element includes goals and policies relating to the preservation and maintenance of open space areas identified in the Land Use Element for natural resource conservation and recreational access to parks and beaches. Noise Element policies ensure that conflicts between uses proposed in the Land Use Element are minimized, and that uses producing higher noise levels are located away from residential areas and schools.The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element regulates proposed land uses in areas with higher potential for natural or human-caused hazards such as flooding or pollution. The Public Services and Infrastructure Element ensures adequate services and upkeep of roadways, utilities, and other infrastructure. The City must account for the amount and location of growth and development laid out in the Land Use Element and identify the mechanisms necessary to ensure adequate infrastructure is in place to support the anticipated growth. The Housing Element contains goals and policies relating to the availability, adequacy, and affordability of housing for all economic segments of the community. This is an important relationship, since the Land Use Element dictates where residential uses are allowed and prioritized within the planning area. The Historic and Cultural Resources Element identifies important historical resources within the community and documents issues potentially affecting their status as significant resources. Land use compatibility can affect historic and cultural resources and the viability of future use, restoration, and preservation of these resources. The Coastal Element is part of the City's Local Coastal Program and outlines the City's roles, responsibilities, and strategies to provide coastal access and protect coastal resources within the coastal zone consistent with the California Coastal Act. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-3 Land Use Plan The Land Use Plan categorizes and maps where residential, commercial, industrial, and community facilities are located today and where they are planned for the future. This plan describes the envisioned characterof change to the current development pattern and land uses, the planned distribution and development density and/or intensity of future uses, and how land use goals will be achieved throughout the planning area and within each land use designation. Characterizing Land Uses Land uses are generally described by the maximum density and/or intensity, a measure of how much development exists or can be built on a site, and by the characteristics of use(s) located on a site. Density, intensity, and use characteristics form the basis for categorizing types of development into land use designations. Density and Intensity Density applies to residential and mixed-use Maximum Building Intensity(FAR) designations that allow for residential development. This term describes the 35 number of dwelling units accommodated within 1 net acre of land (dwelling units per net acre[du/ac]). As a secondary calculation, o density can also refer to the population that can be accommodated within 1 acre of land t a. s (population per acre[pop/ac]). Intensity applies to nonresidential developments such as commercial and industrial buildings, as well as nonresidential portions of mixed-use development. This term describes the floor-to-area ratio (FAR), or the relationship between the total area of a development and the area of the parcel where the development is located. FAR is calculated by dividing the gross floor area (the amount of floor space) of all buildings (excluding garages) on a lot by the net ground area of the lot. FAR and other development factors,such as building square footage, building height, and the percent of lot coverage, are interrelated. For example, a 20,000-square-foot building on a 40,000-square-foot lot yields a FAR of 0.5:1 (comparable to 20,000:40,000). The 0.5:1 FAR could accommodate a single-story building that covers half the lot, or a two- story building on a quarter of the lot. FARs are typically expressed as a single number rather than a ratio (e.g., 0.5:1 is expressed as 0.5 FAR), and this notation will be used throughout this plan. 2-4 "` City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) a 1i In some areas of Huntington Beach, intensity and density are regulated by development and design standards rather than FAR limits. These standards, sometimes referenced as form-based codes, may include specifications for setbacks (how far a building may be situated from a street or sidewalk), limits on building height and massing (e.g., size and shape), and requirements to include open space, among others. These standards apply to properties within the planning areas of specific plans,which establish these standards when they are adopted. The maximum allowable development on any individual parcel is governed by the maximum measure of density or intensity permitted for that land use designation applied to the parcel. The General Plan uses these measurements to establish development capacity for each individual parcel and for the planning area at large. The planned (and actual) density or intensity on a parcel is usually less than the maximum, and is influenced by the physical characteristics of a parcel, access and infrastructure limitations, compatibility with other nearby uses,market factors,and past development trends. Use Characteristics Use characteristics refer to the intended character and development pattern of, and uses associated with,a parcel of land.The General Plan uses these use characteristics to classify buildings with similar characteristics into land use designations. To maintain compatible development on and between sites and within neighborhoods, overlay areas, and other defined areas, use characteristics for each designation are intentionally limited. Distribution of Existing Uses Existing land uses in Huntington Beach include a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, mixed use, parks, open space (e.g., wetlands, beaches), oil-related, and public uses. According to a 2014 land use survey,residential development is the predominant use in the city; housing uses constitute about 43 percent of all land uses in the planning area. Public uses, primarily comprising public rights-of-way, occupy an additional 28 percent of the planning area. Open space,commercial,and industrial development occupies most of the remainder of the planning area. Character of Change Change is a constant process observed over a specified time frame. Between now and 2040, Huntington Beach expects a certain continuing level of change resulting from a number of forces such as population growth,changing demographics,the need to replace aging buildings and improve existing homes, and an ever-changing economy. Physical F; changes are guided by new development that almost exclusively occurs through private forces based on market demand. The goals and policies provided in this element address areas and locations thatwould be best suitedto accommodate transformational changethat E. supports the Community Vision established in the General Plan. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-5 II YY £e ra ® U City of City of i.. Westminster al Beach, � a Bolas AveMcFadden a Ave; m m Hun (on y me r r, ... v� Heil Ave �9d _ 0..... f City of _r Fountain Valley Uta Ave SlaterAve00 "t Caib �� a TaRasrtAve to t r. Ellis 35 a .Ave 'E c S „' s 2 g to a3 >^ s r G arfield Ava York,u JtownAve- s iAdamsMe t. tiulianapolieAve #Atktnte Ave LEGEND 5• e` 19 0 Character of Change oaHarrultonAve Conserve 5` s )Banning Ave Preserve lop c° } Transform ?e � j� 's:.9ty of, e` Costa Mesa 0 0.s 1 5 MILES Transform Opportunity Sites - 1-Gothard Street Industrial Corridor 2-Northwest Industrial Area - soume.city artfunans,n Bsecn t2G�ai.'. S�I�t90 Character of Change Figure LU-1 � 3 2-6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) l 'r Figure LU-1 indicates where change is encouraged to occur to accommodate future growth and development under this plan and to what degree it can be expected.As shown in the diagram, most areas in Huntington Beach are proposed to remain much as they are today, or would transform through guidelines provided by documents other than the General Plan. The terms used to describe the planned levels of change range from very little ("Preserve"and "Conserve")to substantial ("Transform"), as follows: Preserve "Preserve"areas are developed portions of Huntington Beach, where land use changes are not envisioned and are not necessary to implement the Community Vision. Preserve areas include all established residential neighborhoods; most commercial, retail, and employment centers;many visitor-serving commercial uses;and all of the Downtown area. Conserve "Conserve"areas include open space and recreational areas that provide valuable natural habitat or parkland and support the community recreational and aesthetic needs. This category includes the beach, the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, parks, golf courses, and other similar uses. Transform "Transform" areas consist of underdeveloped or underutilized portions of the planning area, where current developments might not adequately support future City goals. These areas are located within the Northwest Industrial Area and along the Gothard Corridor, where a majority of the city's industrial uses are located. To assist in transforming these areas,the General Plan proposes a new land use designation, Research and Technology, enabling a broader mix of lower-intensity industrial and commercial uses that better meet current and future market demands, and capture employment growth in emerging fields. Additional areas in the city could transform via means other than those established within the General Plan (e.g., specific plan areas). Land Use Map Land use designations are applied to every parcel within the planning area; however, the City can only regulate land uses located within the city limits. Figure LU-2 illustrates the planned distribution and intensity of land use in the planning area. ..�yn City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-7 �r�r0i Land Use Designations The General Plan establishes 20 designations (18 primary land use designations and 2 overlay designations) that govern land uses within the planning area. These designations apply density and intensity requirements, use characteristics,development standards,and land use policies to individual parcels.As most of the planning area is already developed and maintained in good condition, the designations generally correspond to the pattern of existing uses. The following discussions identify the land use designations, land use characteristics associated with each designation, and the land use density/development intensity allowed within each designation. Residential Designations Four land use designations accommodate solely residential development in Huntington Beach. Collectively, these designations occupy the largest portion of the planning area (45 percent). The designations encompass a wide variety of densities and housing types, ranging from lower-density, primarily detached single-family residences in neighborhoods, to higher-density, mostly attached housing in and adjacent to Downtown,along the coast, and along select arterial roadway corridors. g p Igpp ffPPPPI�''lli�'�!lllldi�@9�919I',I',V49i ' i 4ly��lil'a''IdI'I1a" I'I' Low Density Residential Density range: up to 7.0 units/acre The Low Density Residential designation provides for traditional detached single-family housing, zero-lot-line developments, mobile home parks, low-density senior housing, and accessory dwelling units or "granny"flats. �r Medium Density Residential Density range: >7.0-15.0 units/acre The Medium Density Residential designation provides for uses allowed with the Low Density Residential designation, as well as smaller lot detached single- family housing, zero-lot-line developments, attached single-family housing (e.g., duplexes, townhomes), and lower-density multiple-family housing, such as garden apartments. Medium High Density Residential Density range: >15.0-25.0 units/acre The Medium High Density Residential designation provides for uses allowed in the Low and Medium Density Residential designations as well as attached single-family housing (e.g.,townhomes),and a limited range of multiple- famil housing (e. ., garden apartments, lofts). Y 9 2-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) h qq o: v W city w 3 01tyl'f gg' SOISS Ave d z Ave m3 of tilts rA" 3 t MR SkWAve � I � a Te1WdAVe AlM S (58Frt8�(tA ,� 'yatk�WvtAv ACEams.A" 9 � F yya a'vy. �y V � n Ali\ HamnA nnogAve ..W� City gi LEGEND Proposed Land Use Oes gnations Re�dansaJ h1ksw.1 opt SPaca Lam dke 4(mmI did= mddnm it—C,76 PAR) bW I..6i+is y tmas 15 6u40 R7 R. and TW..I gXtmaa I*FAR) Pat4 Wdwm tagh Damnay tmrti'.S Cwat7 bE Rauea€tat+ M MON DatmytY400.Nc} MixodUst DSS"f W.W'Ratl"t woo uw a Comnerc}ad CH 4L#tgMmmmd 7maxd:l5 FARt m G.—,—1.5 fAM PEIt#t}C a4-M.Pl— m;Wrs.ry np Y—t.d FAR} P#aF�c -w SP-00C PWI 0-my -�--. P#arikrsaaegxAak -mu fi.aa a�+ey �AtCaimax.tASAlts (3MYthYlyAkp, ,-a ,y i.Wl tael 0-YI- #: 3 La coma C-40 CCmmsFiaYs Wid Use Plaii Figure ,- City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-9 rr� High Density Residential Density range: >30.0 units/acre The High Density Residential designation provides for uses allowed in the Low, Medium, and Medium High Density Residential designations as well as a broad range of multiple-family housing types(e.g.,apartments, condominiums, lofts). The maximum density allowed within the area designated with the High Density Residential land use is prescribed on the Land Use Map for individual parcels/areas or within an adopted specific plan that covers the High Density Residential designated area. Commercial Designations Four land use designations accommodate commercial development in Huntington Beach. The businesses and other organizations located in these designations provide jobs, services, and goods, contributing to the economic vitality and shaping the physical environment. These commercial-focused designations are distinguished by location and the customers the uses are intended to serve. Neighborhood-serving commercial uses are located in low-scale stand-alone buildings or small centers near residential neighborhoods. Community- and regional-serving uses occupy larger properties near principal intersections. Visitor-serving uses are located near primary tourist destinations, including the beach and pier. One employment-focused office designation supports professional employment centers and complementary uses in and around Downtown and along arterial corridors. Neighborhood Commercial FAR range:up to 0.35 The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale retail commercial, professional offices, eating and drinking establishments, financial institutions, household goods, food sales, drugstores, personal services,cultural facilities, institutional, health, =' government offices, and similar uses designed to serve the needs of the surrounding residential area. The maximum building height is two stories. 2 10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) General Commercial FAR range:up to 1.5 The General Commercial designation provides for retail commercial, professional offices, eating and drinking s establishments, financial institutions, automobile sales, household goods, food sales, drugstores, building materials and supplies, personal services, recreational commercial, hotels/motels, timeshares, cultural facilities, institutional, health care, government offices, educational, and similar uses designed to serve the needs of the community. The maximum building height is two stories. Visitor Commercial FAR range:up to 0.5 The Visitor Commercial designation provides for hotels/motels, timeshares, recreational commercial, eating and drinking establishments, retail, cultural facilities, and similar uses that are designed to serve the needs of tourists visiting the city and region. Office FAR range:up to 1.0 The Office designation providesfor professional offices, ancillary commercial services (e.g., financial institutions, print shops), eating and drinking establishments, and similar uses designed to serve the ... needs of businesses and employees. Mixed-Use Designation One land use designation accommodates mixed-use development that currently occurs entirely within established specific plan areas. The designation is intended to provide for compact, pedestrian-oriented developments with commercial centers that range in scale from small neighborhood-serving centers to large community- and regional-serving centers.These developments will generally feature mixed types of commercial uses,and may include multiple-family residential housing, civic and cultural uses,and open spaces accessible to the public. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-11 Mixed-Use Building FAR range and residential densities are established per specific plan and shown on the Land Use Map for specific areas. The Mixed-Use designation provides for any combination of commercial uses; offices; attached single-family housing, multiple-family housing, and live- work units; institutional uses; cultural facilities; developments including an open space component; and/or civic facilities. Mixing of these uses may occur in a vertical and/or horizontal orientation. Maximum FAR and residential density standards are established within individual specific plan areas. For some specific plans, FAR and density are not prescribed for individual properties or developments. In these cases,the overlaying specific plan includes a maximum development capacity for each land use. Industrial Designations Two land use designations accommodate industrial development in Huntington Beach.To ensure that the city is well positioned for future prosperity,these designations continue to provide jobs in established industries, while also supporting new employment opportunities that accompany emerging technologies and the redevelopment of transitioning industrial areas. One designation accommodates a diverse mix of nonresidential uses. The other accommodates a range of industrial uses that have historically characterized established industrial areas. Research and Technology FAR range: up to 1.0 The Research and Technology designation provides for a wide variety of nonresidential mixed-use development in industrial areas that are undergoing or poised for transformation to support changing employment demand. The designation encourages both employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees while continuing to allow traditional industrial uses such as manufacturing and production. Uses include clean and green manufacturing (e.g., medical devices, solar panels), research and development, technology, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, limited eating and drinking establishments that have an industrial component(e.g., a brewery),restaurants and cafes to accommodate employment uses and surrounding residential neighborhoods, and similar neighborhood commercial uses. f 2-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Industrial FAR range: up to 0.75 The Industrial designation provides for manufacturing (e.g., assembly, fabrication), construction, transportation, logistics, auto repair, research and development, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, ancillary commercial services (e.g., financial institutions, print shops),warehouse and sales outlets, and similar uses. Open Space and Recreational Designations Five land use designations accommodate resource conservation,parks,and recreation in Huntington Beach. Conservation The Conservation designation provides for environmental resource conservation and ' management (e.g., wetland protection)and supporting ancillary uses(e.g., maintenance equipment storage). Park The Park designation provides for public parks and recreational facilities and supporting ancillary uses(e.g., maintenance equipment storage). Recreation The Recreation designation provides for publicly or privately operated recreation facilities, such as golf courses. This designation also provides for supporting ancillary uses(e.g.,food stands, recreational equipment rentals, maintenance equipment storage). Water Recreation The Water Recreation designation provides for water bodies used for recreational purposes, such as boating, swimming, and water sports. i City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-13 s Shore The Shore designation provides for coastal beaches �s � operated by the City and state, and publicly or privately operated ancillary uses(e.g., food stands, recreationalf Y t k equipment rentals, maintenance equipment storage). Public and Semi-Public Designations Two land use designations accommodate a wide variety of publicly owned facilities and community-serving uses. Public The Public designation provides for government administrative (e.g., City Hall) and related facilities, such as public utilities, public parking lots, and similar uses. Public-Semipublic ; The Public-Semipublic designation provides for public £,. and private schools, hospitals, churches, cultural facilities, institutional, and similar semi-public community service uses. Most land use properties with a Public- Semipublic designation have an underlying designation shown in parentheses on the Land Use Map. The underlying designation indicates the preferred land use in the event the sites permanently transitions to another use.A General Plan Amendment would be necessary to change these sites to the underlying designation or any other land use. Overlay Designations Two overlay designations are included on the Land Use Map. These overlay designations provide additional development criteria to supplement the underlying or base land use designation. Overlay designations are noted as a suffix to the base land use designation on the Land Use Map. Mixed Use Overlay The Mixed Use Overlay permits the development of residential uses in conjunction with the underlying commercial designation. Currently,the only area of the city with the Mixed Use Overlay designation is within the Sunset Beach Specific Plan, which permits residential units in conjunction with visitor-serving commercial uses on designated parcels in the specific plan area. Design and density standards are set forth in the specific plan. 2-14 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) i`IM�1 Specific Plan Overlay The Specific Plan Overlay permits the underlying land use designation and requires a specific plan to provide greater specificity for development of property and includes such things as land use and infrastructure plans,design and development standards,circulation and pedestrian access,and design guidelines. Permitted density and intensity is either shown on the Land Use Map in parentheses or established in the specific plan. Adopted Specific Plans There are 15 adopted specific plans in Huntington Beach, as identified in Figure LU-3. These plans have predominantly been used to focus on the characteristics unique to an area and customize the planning process and land use regulations and requirements to apply to that area of the city. Specific plans provide greater specificity for land use and infrastructure plans, design and development standards, and phasing/implementation. Designations for SP-2 and SP-16 are currently reserved for future specific plans, in the event they are needed. The City has several specific plans that are also within the coastal zone and, as such,are incorporated into the City's certified Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan. Two adopted specific plans, Brightwater Specific Plan and Sunset Beach Specific Plan, have not been certified by the California Coastal Commission. The land use designations for these specific plan areas are shown on the Land Use Map with the notation that they have not been certified as part of the City's Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan. mj City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-15 1N. i� dityof city Of Sea!Beach Westminster 11 Bolea AI@ �a J C 40 B tart r 13 14 EdIWAxe �, 1 1a ^�� FhrMfrlgtott x Narbe�ur ` He#Ave 1 5 14 �if}Fof � Fountain Valley. © VM Axe Ib 5#D#trAxt `�fi� Baal C htca 1 Talbert Ave t1 tYrtbruia �� 1 Yn Eft h ' Axe E Garfield Eve te Y LEGEND —major city Streets �•Cfv Limas AdaniS Axe Specific plans 1 Mrth Huntington Cantor - .; 2 tzese:red � °4� - ind#anapaiisAxri 3 Seale -� g d tw"nomfartst sty Ctuis AtkarftAxe 5 mwntown ` 14 IMC Seacl'r.T ` 7 E@is-Galdemvest _ r, o at Axe 8 tateadRwark b 5 vwy-seadFti O° Act �. ing Axe 10 mwwha pacift C 11 Mc`?tnna?I(>-toe Buatnass Park - � •.- 12 PatniGotdanwest c'�' �� . ,s BPu TermCosta Mesa 14 Beach Edinger Corridors - i5 Sfigh&smter G� 17 8wiset Begirt 0 QS I 1. t 1 �........( a MILES D.t.Baum Dal.c—viw Sty Pec(2m) am Nap 3cures-talydNUMa¢.a atact+�2Ei4i ' Adopted Specific Plans Figure U-3 r� 2-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Community Subareas In addition to the specific plans identified throughout the planning area, the General Plan also identifies a number of community subareas (Figure LU-4), which are intended to supplement density/intensity standards, use characteristics,and urban design goals and policies provided in this element beyond the guidance offered by the land use designations. Each community subarea has been identified to further the economic goals and guiding principles of the City and to enhance areas where reinvestment or improvements are proposed during the life of the General Plan, but require additional consideration due to their locations and/or environmental setting.Although some subareas are contained partially or wholly within a specific plan, the description and goals of the subareas in this General Plan do not conflict with the respective specific plans. The following subareas have been identified through the General Plan process or carried over from the previous General Plan. Intersection Enhancement Subareas The following four community subareas represent opportunities to improve neighborhood gateways and commercial corridors within the planning area. Subarea 1:Beach/Wamerintersection Enhancement Encompassing the four corners of the Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue intersection, within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, this 27-acre subarea is designated Mixed-Use and surrounded by Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, General Commercial,Mixed-Use,and Public uses.The subarea includes buildings of varying scales and architectural styles. The built environment and streetscapes lack a cohesive style. The predominant uses are retail stores, a gas station, a drug store, a car wash, and the 14-story Ocean Tower. The intersection is the subarea's defining feature. Subarea 2:BrookhurstlAdams Intersection Enhancement Encompassing the four corners of the Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue intersection, this subarea includes 58 acres of commercial use. Surrounded by low-density residential uses to the south and medium high-density residential uses to the north, each corner contains a variety of commercial uses within individual developments. This subarea is characterized by large parking lots separated from the main roadways by landscape buffers. Strip retail and/or large format retailers are located behind the parking areas, and small pad retail buildings are dispersed within portions of the developments. The buildings generally maintain a low profile and the built environment and streetscapes lack a cohesive identity. Existing uses include banks, restaurants, a grocery store, a drugstore, and several small commercial service businesses. Both streets are wide and E carry a large volume of traffic through the subarea. y City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-17 �~w City of City Of e Westminster Seat Beach t m BotsaAve. �..� G m r s McFadden 72 Ave Edinger Ave r Hunttngton`m Hell Ave ,g1y E j c .� city Of Fountain Valley 1 V to Ave SlaterAve Zalb err ��•� qyQ TalberlAve Wetland's Q9� •�'�`� Ellis 3 r Ave o P = un GartieidAve ..—q• 6 _ YowktownAve' Ve W � � m , ��•. ' j AdamsA'e t LEGEND — Major City Streets q �j Indianapolis Ave —•— City Limits Q Community Subareas ! Atlanta Ave x 1-Beachh"latrwr Intersection 4` 2-BrockhurWAdams Intersection ^ day jt Haml7tanAve 3-Goidenwest/Edinger Intersection o $ 4-GoldenwestMtarner Intersection 7, % Banning Ave 5-Gothard Street Ca 6-Northwest Industrial r 7-Open Space Shore ca$ I B 8-PCH/Beach Northeast 9-Peter's Landing 10-Sunset Beach Q} a 0 0.5 s MILES sowo.:City o+x.,fing o a...e(zgsy..'. Laud Use Subareas Figure LU 2-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Subarea 3: Goldenvwst/Edinger Intersection Enhancement Encompassing the four corners of the Goldenwest Street and Edinger Avenue intersection, within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, this 79-acre subarea includes portions of Goldenwest College and commercial development designated for future mixed commercial and residential use on three corners.The subarea is surrounded by additional public uses associated with Goldenwest College to the north/northeast, additional planned mixed commercial and residential uses to the east, and low-density residential uses to the south and west. The remainder of the subarea consists of commercial development. The development pattern features large parking areas along both arterial streets, strip retail and/or large format retail stores located behind the parking areas, and pad buildings and smaller retail centers interspersed within the parking areas. The parcel located at the southwest corner of the intersection is currently vacant. The subarea's built environment and streetscapes lack a cohesive identity. The wide streets provide motorists with good access to the college and the retail uses, but limit pedestrian access,especially for students attempting to cross the streets to patronize businesses. Subarea 4: Goldenmst/Warner Intersection Enhancement Encompassing 64 acres along the four corners of Warner Avenue and Goldenwest Street, this subarea is predominantly designated for commercial and office use. It is surrounded by two low-density residential neighborhoods, a medium high-density residential development, Ocean View High School, Golden View Elementary School, two parks,and a flood control channel. This subarea features various forms of commercial development. Large parking areas fronted by landscape buffers line both arterial streets; strip retail and/or large format retailers are located behind the parking areas;and small pad retail buildings are dispersed within the parking areas. The buildings generally maintain a low profile, and between each of the corners of the intersection, the buildings and streetscape/landscape currently lack a cohesive identity. In addition to large and small retail businesses,the overlay area also includes an assisted living facility and various small service businesses. Both Warner Avenue and Goldenwest Street are wide arterials, carrying large volumes of traffic through the intersection, but impeding pedestrian access from one corner of the site to another. The overlay area also currently lacks pedestrian connections to adjoining residential areas. 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-19 Technology and Innovation Subareas Subarea 5: Gothard Street Centrally located along Gothard Street between Edinger Avenue and Ellis Avenue, the 422-acre Gothard Street Subarea consists of both industrial and research and technology uses,along with a few isolated community service and public use parcels.The subarea is predominantly surrounded by residential development of varying density and character to the east and south, areas identified for mixed commercial and residential development to the north along Edinger Avenue, and Ocean View High School and Central Park to the west. The eastern edge of the subarea abuts the Oak View neighborhood. The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right-of-way runs just east of the Gothard Street Subarea, extending from the northern city limits to its endpoint just north of Garfield Avenue. The Gothard Street Subarea is predominantly occupied by smaller manufacturing and warehouse uses and auto repair facilities. Other uses include a lumberyard, some retail and office uses, Republic Services, several gyms/training facilities, Seabreeze Church, and City facilities. The built environment consists of small industrial buildings, isolated offices,and a few industrial parks. Incompatibilities between existing industrial uses in the subarea and residential uses in the Oak View neighborhood present existing environmental justice concerns, as expressed by community members. Given the proximity to residential uses and Ocean View High School, the potential for land use compatibility and environmental justice issues associated with typical industrial use remains an ongoing concern. The City has also designated the abandoned portion of the UPRR rail corridor south of Ellis Avenue for a future transportation corridor use. Potential uses include development of a bicycle or multipurpose trail or an exclusive transit corridor. To support economic development goals to attract new incubator and technology-oriented uses, this subarea introduces the Research and Technology land use designation along with the existing Industrial designation to promote opportunities for new industrial uses that are generally greener, lighter, more mixed with commercial,and more compatible with surrounding sensitive uses.Similar to the Northwest Industrial Subarea, this subarea uses the Research and Technology designation to provide a flexible platform for both industrial and commercial uses that do not fit into the city's historically commercial or industrial areas. While the average building intensity of research and technology use is anticipated to be higher than that of traditional industrial use, the processes and operations of such uses are intended to have fewer potential air quality and noise impacts on surrounding sensitive uses than conventional industrial activities. The maximum development intensity for uses in this subarea ranges from 0.75 FAR for traditional industrial uses to 1.0 FAR for proposed research and technology uses. ' 2-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Subarea 6:Northvwst Industrial The 760-acre Northwest Industrial Subarea is located in the northwestern portion of the planning area. Comprising the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan north of Bolsa Avenue and industrial and research and technology uses south of Bolsa Avenue, the subarea is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, and east, and is bordered by the City of Seal Beach to the west and by Interstate 405 and commercial developments to the east and north. This subarea is anchored by two of Huntington Beach's largest employers (Boeing and C&D/Zodiac Aerospace), as well as a variety of industrial, technology,commercial service,and fitness uses.The built environment ranges from large office buildings and business parks to small commercial pad and industrial spec buildings. Giventhe proximity to residential uses,the potential for land use compatibility issues within typical industrial uses is a major concern. As a result, this subarea introduces the Research and Technology land use designation in areas adjacent to single-family residential neighborhoods to promote opportunities for new industrial uses that are more compatible with surrounding sensitive uses. The Research and Technology designation provides a flexible platform for both industrial and commercial uses that do not fit into the city's historically commercial or industrial areas. Many new business types require this flexibility as they may need both commercial and industrial components to conduct business.As a result,the Research and Technology designation is a catalyst to spur employment growth and change within this opportunity area, reinforcing the City's desire to meet current and future needs and spur economic growth. The maximum development intensity for uses in this subarea ranges from 0.75 FAR for traditional industrial uses to 1.0 FAR for proposed research and technology uses. Pacific Coast Highway Coastal Corridor Subareas These subareas intend to preserve and enhance the recreational character of the Pacific Coast Highway coastal corridor through the expansion of visitor-serving uses and maintenance of open spaces and recreational opportunities. The intent is to establish distinct commercial nodes, residential communities, and open spaces along its length. Subarea 7: Open Space—Shore The shoreline along Pacific Coast Highway is an amenity that requires a careful balance of preservation and enhancement of the recreational character through the expansion of visitor-serving uses and maintenance/improvement of open spaces and recreational opportunities consistent with policies and programs identified in the Coastal Element. No s modifications to development intensities or use characteristics are proposed. However, future development or reuse projects will be required to highlight environmental awareness and education initiatives in project design. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-21 M�w 11 Subarea 8:Pack Coast HighKey/Beach Northeast This subarea allows for Open Space-Conservation(OS-C),Visitor Commercial (CV),and Medium Density Residential (RM)uses,with building heights up to three stories,and land use density/intensity limited to 15 du/ac and 0.5 FAR, respectively. Key elements of this subarea include: • Establishment of a major streetscape element to identify the Beach Boulevard-Pacific Coast Highway intersection. • Site, design, and limit the scale and mass of development, as necessary,to protect wetlands. • Maintain visual compatibility with Downtown. • Incorporate on-site recreation amenities for residents. • Minimize access to and from Pacific Coast Highway, providing an internal roadway system. • Incorporate extensive landscape and streetscape. Subarea 9:Peter's Landing Located at the western end of the planning area, the Peter's Landing Subarea is located northeast of Pacific Coast Highway and Anderson Street. The purpose of this subarea is to promote revitalization and enhancement of the commercial center and to establish a unified "village" character. Through the use of consistent architecture, appropriate massing, and proper building placement and orientation, Peter's Landing should be redeveloped to promote extensive pedestrian activity and human-scale character. A key component of any future redevelopment should include a major entryway into the subarea which also serves as a landmark entry into the City of Huntington Beach from the north. Future development should provide pedestrian linkages with surrounding areas that link Pacific Coast Highway to the waterways within Huntington Harbour and incorporate measures to reduce roadway noise from Pacific Coast Highway.Due to the scale and type of development desired by the community, development intensity in the Peter's Landing Subarea is limited to a maximum 0.5 FAR, building heights are limited to three stories, and uses permitted are limited to Visitor Commercial (CV). 2-22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Subarea 10: Sunset Beach In addition to the regulations and guidance provided in the Sunset Beach Specific Plan (SP 17), the Sunset Beach subarea was established to provide guidance for future development activities that ensure Sunset Beach maintains its distinctive and unique neighborhood a ` character and to promote cohesion between Sunset Beach, Huntington Harbour, and the balance of Huntington Beach. During the GPAC meetings, discussion of the Sunset Beach subarea emphasized the need for extensive outreach to existing property owners, residents,and businesses during planning activities. In addition, inclusion of key stakeholders, such as the Sunset Beach Sanitary District, Sunset Beach Community Association, Sunset Beach LCP Review Board, Las Damas, and Sunset Beach Woman's Club, is recommended. Distribution of Land Uses Table LU-1 identifies the distribution of land uses described in this element and in Figure LU-2. The largest land use in the planning area is residential, which makes up approximately 42.5 percent of the planning area with single-family residential comprising the majority of the residential land use designations. The next largest land uses in the planning area are public and rights-of-way(27.9 percent) and open space uses including recreation and conservation(17.4 percent). F City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-23 Table LU-1 General Plan Distribution of Land Uses Res Low Density 5,666.3 29.8% Medium Density 1,184.6 6.2% Medium High Density 1,034.4 5.5% High Density 180.7 0.95% Cpmmeincl al M 3 Neighborhood 90.9 0.48% General 296.9 1.6% Visitor 165.7 0.9% Office 16.3 0.1% Mixed Use Mixed Use 637.9 3.4% Industrial Research and Technology 473.2 2.5% Industrial 654.6 3.5% Cfpeln Space"wind ReceatlQa , Conservation 1,661.9 8.8% Park 701.1 3.7% Recreation 237.8 1.3% Water Recreation 238.7 1.3% Shore 434.3 2.3% WNW mrnni ,sS ,:` Public 835.7 4.4% Public-Semipublic 779.2 4.1% Rights-of-Way 3,681.5 19.4% Total 18,971.8* 100% Source:City&Huntington Beach `Totals may not add up due to rounding Development Capacity Table LU-2 identifies the development capacity associated with the planned distribution of land uses described in this element and summarizes the land use distribution and the resulting residential and nonresidential levels of development that can be expected from implementation of land use policies established by the General Plan. As the density and intensity standards for each land use designation are applied to future development projects and land use decisions, properties will gradually transition from one use to another, and land uses and intensities will gradually shift to align with the intent of this Land Use Element. 2-24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) r�1 Table LU- General Flan Development Capacity s- a f • ftin VIUM11f Residential 8,066.0 85,360 — Commercial 1,207.7 43' 18,442,316 _Industrial_ 1,127.8 — 24,149,404 Open Space & Recreational 3,273.8 — 1,734,283 Public& Rights-of-Way 5,296.4 — 6,084,987 85 403d 4 Total(204 yF 18,971 * y,.,; J9,r Ex'istin (M4 Totals`_.. 8 t 5 , 45,f 2 ( fit a ChngeW201M204C} 7;228_£... n< fi ,34,J2t7,. Source:City of Huntington Beach Notes: Totals maynot add up due to rounding 1.Residential units located in the General Commercial designation represent existing residential units on land designated for a range of nonresidential uses where no land use change is anticipated. The Land Use Element does not directly specify a maximum population for Huntington Beach. The maximum possible number of residential units is determined by the different maximum densities allowed for each land use designation and the amount of land area with that designation. However, this maximum number of units is unlikely to be reached because every residential parcel in Huntington Beach would need to be developed to its maximum potential. Because most of the planning area is built out and existing buildings are generally in good condition, these changes will primarily occur within the "transform" areas identified in Figure LU-1. Forecasting assumptions are used to determine the realistic expected number of residential units that Huntington Beach will have when all of the parcels that are reasonably expected to redevelop have already done so. "A City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-25 urban Design plan In 2000, the City adopted Urban Design Guidelines intended to address urban design issues citywide and guide new development in the city.This Urban Design Plan identifies key community issues related to urban design and includes goals and policies to ensure that these issues continue to be addressed throughout implementation of the Urban Design Guidelines and other City codes. Beach City Culture and Identity Future development should maintain and enhance the unique beach and "Surf City' feel of Huntington Beach. This includes � preserving historic and cultural resources related to that identity, such as older neighborhoods and historic buildings; perpetuating traditional beach city architectural styles and design motifs in newer districts and neighborhoods; and preventing development from encroaching on views of the Pacific Ocean,the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, and Huntington Harbour. Fostering the Identity of Individual Neighborhoods and Districts Some of Huntington Beach's established suburban districts,neighborhoods, and corridors lack a distinctive character, which can contribute to a weak visual community image. Future development occurring in these areas should foster or enhance the particular identity of the individual area and the ability of a person to identify or associate the area with the city's unique beach city identity. This can be accomplished through the use of appropriate architectural styles and treatments, more extensive landscaping and street trees, coordinated streetscape elements and signage, public art, and the enhanced treatment of walled superblock corridors. Accommodating Larger-Scale Development while Enhancing Character of Commercial Corridors Many of the city's suburban commercial corridors appear fragmented, lack a unified identity and sense of center, incorporate inconsistent and excessively large signage, and possess varied development scales that create a disjointed appearance within the corridor and conflict with surrounding uses. Future development should be designed to better 2-26 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) accommodate larger-scale development and to bring greater cohesion and enhanced character to these areas. This can be accomplished by designing projects to be visually distinctive, create a sense of place, provide adequate transitions in density, intensity, scale, and height, address public streets and tie into the city's grid street pattern, and incorporate attractive, coordinated signage that is properly scaled and located on the site. Maintaining Historic Character and Architectural Diversity in Downtown Major new projects in the Downtown area have joined and in some instances supplanted the older buildings traditionally associated with this area. Older structures should be integrated into Downtown's design themes. At the same time, Downtown should maintain some architectural diversity, as well as observe the retail street wall through consistent setbacks,taking care to coordinate new development setbacks with existing setbacks. Economic Development Plan Economic, demographic, social, and cultural conditions within Huntington Beach are interconnected. Land use decisions help to shape the local economy over time. Various aspects of urban design also determine the economic health of the community. This Economic Development Plan outlines the general economic issues and strategies the City intends to use to ensure a strong and healthy economy in the decades ahead. Conditions affecting the local economy include land use decisions, business retention and development initiatives, job formation, and private and public investment patterns. This section covers general economic issues that have affected Huntington Beach in the recent past and highlights recent trends and growth patterns that illustrate future needs. Economic Trends Approximately 75,000 employees lived in Huntington Beach in 2012. For many decades, the economic engine of Huntington Beach was the aerospace industry. However,the past two decades have also seen the . continued expansion of many high- tech light industrial and service 's industries. This reflects a long, " ongoing shift away from land-intensive industrial operations (i.e., oil extraction and processing). The four largest employment x ,4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-27 y sectors today are tourism, industrial, professional office,and healthcare/social assistance. Top employers include the aerospace industry and a number of businesses in the manufacturing, healthcare, waste management, and retail sectors. Together, these industries accountfor roughly 13 percent of the jobs in Huntington Beach. Forecasts conducted in 2014 indicate Huntington Beach is heading toward a long-term period of slow but steady population and employment growth. Estimates indicate that employment is projected to experience a relatively higher growth rate than household growth, resulting in an increase in the jobs-housing ratio from 1.03 in 2012 to 1.10 in 2040. This level of growth is projected to be lower than most surrounding jurisdictions,including the county as a whole, which is projected to increase from 1.54 to 1.68 within the same time frame. Average annual wages earned by Huntington Beach residents have increased approximately 29 percent between 2002 and 2011. However,accounting for inflation and the recent economic recession between 2009 and 2014, real income has not grown. In 2012 inflation-adjusted dollars, median household income decreased 11 percent from 2000 to 2012. However, the city's median household income is 5.8 percent greater than the median in Orange County. Commuter Inflow/Outflow Commuting behavior is linked to the jobs-housing ratio. Approximately 86 percent of Huntington Beach residents work elsewhere (a characteristic called outflow), while 82 percent of employees in Huntington Beach commute into the city for work(a characteristic called inflow). Approximately 14 percent of jobs in the city are held by Huntington Beach residents. The result is a large commuting population and longer commute times, which can in turn create increased traffic volumes and longer vehicle miles traveled for residents and nonresidents alike. The high inflow and outflow of commuters indicates a degree of mismatch between residents' skills and education and the available training and jobs in the city, in addition to a relative lack of desirable and affordable housing for workers. Diversifying the economy toward professional/technical, specialized engineering, and research and development sector jobs could create greater job opportunities for residents, resulting in a better jobs- housing balance. Likewise, providing a greater diversity of housing opportunities could also positively affect the jobs-housing ratio. Real Estate Trends Median home values in the city were$616,700 in 2012, which is 21 percent higher than the county median. From 2000 to 2012, housing prices in the city increased 43 percent(in real dollars) versus 37 percent in Orange County. Due to a high quality of life, coastal 2-28 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) M location, and compelling economic opportunity, for-sale housing, resale, and new development activity are expected to remain strong, and increase with growth of new industry and jobs. This makes affordable housing a key economic development issue. The city's trend of higher real estate prices relative to other parts of the county extends to the retail, apartment, and industrial sectors, which have performed at or above market averages over the past five to seven years while experiencing low vacancy rates.The one notable exception is office sector uses, which experience lower rent and higher vacancy rates than the market average. As a result, Huntington Beach is generally considered a secondary office location for businesses requiring leased space. Development Activity Development activity in Huntington Beach is predominantly residential, with a marked increase in mixed-use multifamily style developments accounting for the largest share of new projects. Nonresidential development is dominated by retail uses,with a small portion of industrial uses. Job generation associated with retail development tends to be lower than that associated with industrial development, and wages associated with retail jobs also tend to be lower on average. As a result, the City will continue to look for opportunities to attract employers offering higher paying technical, professional, and skilled labor positions. Retail Capture and Leakage Another way to describe the economic strength or weakness of specific economic sectors compared to the region is by considering capture and leakage. Taxable sales per capita provide an indication of where the city is underperforming in relationship to the local market area and Orange County and where retail sales that could be captured by local shops are being made elsewhere (a characteristic known as leakage). Retail taxable sales per capita are significantly lower in Huntington Beach than both the Orange County and local market area averages.While the recent revitalization of the Bella Terra shopping center and Edinger Plaza addresses part of this issue, other similar opportunities likely exist. The Pacific City development is having a notable positive effect on leakage in this sector.Sites in the planning area that could host development serving these markets are discussed in the Economic Development Strategies section below. Economic Development Strategies Huntington Beach has established goals to bring new local businesses into the city,with }i a focus on start-ups and research and technology industries, while maintaining a diverse `? economic base and strong support for tourism. The City has identified target industries and opportunity areas in the Northwest Industrial Subarea and the Gothard Street Subarea 4- City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-29 for new development to help meet these goals. These opportunity areas were identified because they either have significant concentrations of existing employment, or have future economic growth potential. The City could provide incentives to retain, expand, and capture new businesses, including research and development industries and start-ups. The City should also update the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to ensure that development regulations and land use controls reflect the City's economic development goals. Research and Technology Uses When assessing Huntington Beach's location, employment, and land use potential, technology manufacturing and technology services industries present high potential for growth. A Research and Technology land use designation within the Northwest Industrial Subarea and the Gothard Street Subarea will accommodate these types of future uses. This designation provides for a wide variety of nonresidential mixed-use development and encourages both employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees while continuing to allow traditional industrial uses such as manufacturing and production. Uses may include clean and green manufacturing and industrial uses (e.g., medical devices, clean air technology), research and development uses, technology, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, limited eating and drinking establishments that have an industrial component(e.g., a brewery),restaurants and cafes to accommodate employment uses and surrounding residential neighborhoods, and similar neighborhood commercial uses. Technology firms will demand newer or refurbished multi-tenant buildings that offer modern, high speed and high bandwidth infrastructure. Therefore, the City will also focus on encouraging development of a strong inventory of adequately improved and competitive industrial buildings within these districts that provide the resources and technological capacity desired by businesses in this industry. Infrastructure Along with bandwidth in facilities, adequate infrastructure across all services is also important to support new industry growth. The City must invest in water, sewer, drainage, street, and other infrastructure updates to serve future generations of residents, businesses, and visitors. There is much to be done to achieve long-term fiscal stability and to bring public services and capital infrastructure back to acceptable levels, which were impacted by the economic recession and loss of redevelopment funding. The City will continue to maintain and expand its Capital Projects Reserve for the repair 412 and construction of city infrastructure. New infrastructure projects will be coordinated using a comprehensive systems approach that balances serving existing community members F. and provides adequate capacity for future growth. 2-30 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Quality of Life Huntington Beach currently has an excellent quality of life. Its desirable residential neighborhoods, world-class beaches and recreation areas, and safe environment all contribute to a city that is a great place to live, work,and play. Improving the jobs-housing balance by planning for a range of housing types in appropriate focus areas in conjunction with industrial and commercial expansion is a key component of ensuring and maintaining the city's quality of life. Fiscal Responsibility Without redevelopment, new, creative, and innovative ideas to stimulate business and development will have to be implemented. Resolving these issues and many others will influence the level of net revenues that the City will have available to fund enhanced levels of service and to maintain and build new infrastructure necessary to support a strong, vibrant economy. General Fund costs will now be subject to a fiscal impact analysis since they are so important to the fiscal health of the community. As part of this plan, the economic development recommendations will be tested using a fiscal impact model to provide guidance in the development of effective land use goals and policies that facilitate a strong local economy and long-term fiscal stability.As economic recovery is vulnerable to global, national, and state forces beyond the City's control, the City is committed to continue on the path of fiscal conservatism. Tourism and Hospitality An estimated 30 percent of jobs in Huntington Beach are tourism-based. Tourism is one of the city's competitive economic advantages, and continuing to foster the health of this sector is important to the overall strength and diversity of the city's economy. With over 10 miles of contiguous, accessible coastline, Huntington Beach hosts millions of visitors annually. Many of these visitors stay in one of the city's nearly 2,000 hotel and motel rooms, most of which are located along the coast. However, the current level of demand for overnight accommodations is not fully met within the city, leading to economic leakage and lost tax revenues. Therefore, identifying prime locations along the coastline as well as in other areas that provide a high-quality visitor experience remains an economic development priority. The City will continue to work with existing and future operators to update or expand existing overnight accommodations and visitor-serving facilities, and develop new accommodations and facilities to meet future demands. To complement this strategy, the City will also continue to expand and enhance natural resources, open spaces, and recreation amenities to retain or improve its position among the top tourism destinations in Southern California. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-31 Issues,land Use and Urban Design Goals, and Policies The land use and urban design issues addressed in this element include: • Coordinating development patterns and protecting community character • Addressing interactions between neighborhoods and nonresidential attractions • Providing a range of well-maintained housing types • Protecting and adaptively reusing industrial areas • Maintaining flexible long-term school capacity • Fostering the identity of individual neighborhoods and community subareas • Maintaining historic character and architectural diversity in Downtown Coordinating Development Patterns and Protecting Community Character Much of the planning area has been developed, and many of the remaining undeveloped parcels are committed to development by specific plans and development agreements, or are preserved for open space. Consequently the fundamental patterns, distribution, and form of development has been established. However, protecting the traditional beach and the successful"Surf City"brand and feel of Huntington Beach is a community priority. Continuing to preserve historic and cultural resources related to that "Surf City" identity, such as older neighborhoods; historic buildings, structures, and monuments; Native American, pioneer settlement, agricultural development; and historical periods including prehistory settlements,trading with Catalina, Civil War, World Wars,veterans'history etc., is an important step in retaining Huntington Beach's unique culture. GoalLU-1. New commercial, industrial. and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policies A. Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. B. Ensure new development supports the protection and maintenance of environmental and open space resources. C. Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. D. Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale, and character to complement adjoining uses. 2-32 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) MM Goal LU-2. New development preserves and enhances a distinct Surf City identity, culture, and character in neighborhoods,corridors, and centers. Policies A. Ensure that new development and reuse projects protect existing Surf City culture and identity and preserve and recognize unique neighborhoods and areas as the building blocks of the community. B. Ensure that new and renovated structures and building architecture and site design are context-sensitive,creative, complementary of the city's beach culture, and compatible with surrounding development and public spaces. C. Distinguish neighborhoods and subareas by character and appearance and strengthen physical and visual distinction, architecture, edge and entry treatment, landscape, streetscape, and other elements. Evaluate the potential for enhancement of neighborhood entrances and perimeter walls. D. Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. E. Intensify the use and strengthen the role of public art, architecture, landscaping, site design, and development patterns to enhance the visual image of Huntington Beach. Addressing Interactions Between Neighborhoods and Attractions Huntington Beach contains several well-defined places characterized by community activity and a high level of identity. These include the pedestrian-oriented Downtown area, the beach, Central Park(the city's primary recreation and cultural center), the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, neighborhoods such as Huntington Harbour and Sunset Beach, and the comparatively new Bella Terra area. Most other areas have developed as principally auto- oriented environments that pose a challenge for neighborhood interactions. Future planning should provide multiple ways for neighborhoods and attractions to interact through non-auto travel modes,drawing on existing and expanded bicycle and pedestrian facilities as well as enhanced transit facilities. Goal LU-3. Neighborhoods and attractions are connected and accessible to all residents, employees, and visitors. Policies A. Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. s B. Improve trail, bicycle pathway, roadway, sidewalk, and transit connections to new l development and reuse projects. r C. Ensure connections are well maintained and safe for users. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-33 Providing a Range of Well-Maintained Housing Types Continued increases in land values and construction costs inhibit the ability to provide a range of housing types and prices to meet the needs of existing and future residents, particularly young family households, seniors, and low- and very low-income households. Providing a range of residential land use designations is crucial to meet existing and future housing needs. As the existing housing stock continues to age, ongoing efforts will be required to ensure it is maintained and does not physically or economically deteriorate. Goal LU-4. A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Policies A. Encourage a mix of residential types to accommodate people with diverse housing needs. B. Improve options for people to live near work and public transit. C. Encourage and provide incentives for residential property owners to maintain their homes and buildings. D. Ensure that single-family residences are of compatible proportion scale and character to surrounding neighborhoods. E. Encourage housing options located in proximity to employment to reduce vehicle miles traveled. Protecting and Adaptively Reusing Industrial Areas The nature of industrial uses has changed over the past few decades. Historically, most industrial land in Huntington Beach was used to support the aerospace industry and manufacturing. These uses were separated from residential and commercial uses to avoid transmitting excessive noise and odors, and located adjacent to arterial and rail corridors to support goods movement. Although aerospace and manufacturing uses continue to thrive in Huntington Beach, a variety of nonindustrial uses have been introduced in some industrial areas. Many of these uses have supported and been ancillary to the primary industrial function, while others provide diverse and valuable services to the community. Protecting the city's industrial areas is critical to promote the creation of more local jobs. 2-34 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) r Goal LU-5. Industrial businesses provide employment opportunities for residents, supporting the local economy. Policies A. Support and attract new businesses in the city's industrial areas. B. Encourage clean, less intensive industrial development in areas identified in the planning area. C. Ensure proposed development and uses in industrial areas contribute to the City's economic development objectives and do not minimize existing uses. D. Explore opportunities to optimize use of underutilized or underperforming industrial land that is sensitive to surrounding uses,and to introduce new industrial uses that create jobs. E. Encourage and assist existing and potential industrial owners to update, modernize, and expand their industrial properties. Maintaining Flexible Long-Term School Capacity Much of Huntington Beach was built during a time when demand for school facilities was high to accommodate the needs of the post-World War II baby boom. Today, demand for school facilities is experiencing a relative decline. Some schools in Huntington Beach are at or above capacity while others are under capacity depending on the school or district Short-term demand for residential, commercial, and open space uses is competing with the ability to retain these sites for longer-term school use. Nonoperational schools are being leased for other uses,while other schools are overcrowded. Goal LU-6.Neighborhood school sites adapt over time to meet the changing needs of the community. Policies A. Consistent with state law, explore alternatives with school districts for public benefit and access to recreation and open spaces,as well as other uses for surplus school sites should a closure occur. B. Continue to consult with school districts in connection with any City-related or school district—related planning and environmental review of proposed non-education surplus school site projects. C. In consultation with school districts and consistent with state law, encourage flexible interim use options to maximize existing use of school sites while addressing future community �t needs. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-35 _ Fostering the Identity of Individual Neighborhoods and Community Subareas A lack of distinctive character within some of Huntington Beach's subareas,corridors,and neighborhoods can contribute to an overall weak visual community image. Fostering or enhancing the identity of individual communities is key to strengthening the city's overall image and the ability of a person to identify or associate it uniquely with Huntington Beach. Goal LU-7. Neighborhoods, corridors, and community subareas are well designed, and buildings, enhanced streets, and public spaces contribute to a strong sense of place. Policies A. Preserve unique neighborhoods, corridors, and subareas, and continue to use specific plans to distinguish districts and neighborhoods by character and appearance. B. Use street trees, signage, landscaping, street furniture, public art, and other aesthetic elements to enhance the appearance and identity of subareas, neighborhoods, corridors, nodes, and public spaces. C. Minimize visual clutter along commercial corridors. D. Enhance intersection subareas to create additional pedestrian connections and appeal of the area. E. Promote additional uses that complement and support the existing uses in the intersection subareas. F. Encourage undergrounding of utilities on approaches to and within the intersection subareas. Maintaining Historic Character and Architectural Diversity in Downtown New projects in the Downtown area have joined and in some instances supplanted the older buildings traditionally associated with Downtown. Older structures should be integrated into the design themes of the Downtown.At the same time, Downtown should maintain some architectural diversity, as well as observe the retail street wall through consistent setbacks,taking care to coordinate new development setbacks with existing setbacks. S 2-36 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) M Goal LU-8. Historic character and architectural diversity in Downtown Huntington Beach are protected and enhanced in new development and in the retrofit of existing buildings. Policies A. Reinforce Downtown as the city's historic center and as a pedestrian and bicycle-oriented village with commercial, entertainment, and recreation uses to meet the needs of residents and visitors. B. Encourage development of underused parcels with a mix of uses and unique architecture. C. Ensure new development reflects the Downtown's historical structures and theme. D. Reinforce the unique Downtown character and visual distinctions, architecture, and streetscape. Issues, Goals, and Pon-cies The economic development issues addressed in this element include: • Capitalizing on location with technology infrastructure • Retaining, expanding, and capturing businesses • Capturing sales tax revenues • Encouraging renovation and revitalization of commercial and industrial areas • Adapting to a changing economy • Enhancing tourism, hospitality, and the high tech industry Capitalizing on Location with Technology Infrastructure The City must continue to capitalize on its location and reputation as an advantageous and competitive business location by encouraging expansion of state-of-the-art technology infrastructure related to communications, media, and computing systems that existing and new businesses can cost-effectively use. Coal LU-9. Industrial uses provide job opportunities for existing and future residents, as well as the surrounding region, while generating revenue for the cites Policies ,t A. Establish technology or innovation districts,such as the Gothard Street Subarea and the Northwest Industrial Subarea, where technology infrastructure is provided specifically to support existing and new businesses. !�3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-37 M 000111 B. Support the provision of technology infrastructure and services to supply necessary technological and communication tools for existing and new industry and businesses. C. Provide opportunities for new start-up businesses to develop innovative products and services in a business incubator environment. D. Support the ability for future industrial uses to accommodate new flexible work programs. Retaining, Expanding, and Capturing Businesses The city's business sector includes a sizable share of research, development, and start- up businesses. However, there is an opportunity to attract more of these businesses to locate within the city and thrive, thus increasing the average wage rate of workers and improving the jobs-housing balance. Largely concentrated in the Northwest Industrial Subarea and the Gothard Street Subarea, most of these jobs are associated with technology manufacturing or technology services. Goal LU-10. The City aggressively retains and enhances existing industrial businesses and technology businesses while attracting new firms to the city. Policies A. Provide incentives to retain, expand, and capture new businesses, including research and development industries and start-ups. B. Promote the creation of jobs with increasing wage opportunities within the community. C. In partnership with regional, state, and federal agencies, provide workforce programs that facilitate workforce diversity in the city through expanded labor force training and hiring practices. D. Maximize the economic development services provided by the City to existing and prospective businesses and industries. Capturing Sales Tax Revenues The City must monitor taxable sales trends by key locations and work to reverse leakage trends in retail sales, with the objective of recapturing sales tax revenues that are leaving the city,by promoting targeted development and expansion of commercial uses that serve Huntington Beach and the surrounding region. Goal LU-11. Commercial land uses provide goods and services to meet regional and local needs. Policies A. Encourage a variety of commercial uses that cater to local and regional demand to create an environment that meets resident needs and increases the capture of sales tax revenues. 3 2-38 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) �i • B. Encourage new businesses to locate on existing vacant or underutilized commercial properties where these properties have good locations and accessibility. C. Maximize the economic development services provided by the City to existing and prospective businesses and industries. Encouraging Renovation and Revitalization of Commercial and Industrial Areas There is a marked difference in development quality and property maintenance between older commercial/industrial corridors and newer commercial/industrial and mixed-use centers. Goal LU-12. Commercial and industrial corridors throughout the planning area are renovated and revitalized. Policies A. Establish in the Urban Design Guidelines that nonresidential buildings and sites be designed to be consistent with and use low-impact design techniques. B. Encourage renovation and revitalization of deteriorating and struggling nonresidential areas and corridors, particularly commercial locations. C. Expand shuttle services and pedestrian linkages between adjoining business areas, particularly along the coast, where a greater flow of local shoppers and visitors is encouraged. D. Seek opportunities to encourage the creation of business improvement districts or other economic development strategies where coordination and financing of mutually shared, enhanced services can increase business potential for all. Adapting to a Changing Economy As with the oil industry in the early 20th century, many new industries are getting their start in Huntington Beach in the 21 st century.However,in the past decade, the way businesses operate has changed. Employees are looking for alternatives to long commutes, employers are considering ways to attract new talent, and communities desire greater workforce diversity. Goal LU-13. The city provides opportunities for new businesses and employees to ensure a high quality of life and thriving industry. Policies A. Encourage expansion of the range of goods and services provided to accommodate the needs of all residents and the market area. k City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 2-39 B. Capture emerging industries such as, but not limited to,"knowledge"-based industries and research and development firms. C. Support development of new commercial and industrial projects and retrofits of existing buildings. D. Improve transit and other alternative transportation options, including shuttles and safe bicycle routes, for employees who live and work in the community. E. Do not preclude future mobility technologies in land use planning. Enhancing Tourism and Hospitality Anchored by the beach, Pier, natural resources,and cultural amenities, Huntington Beach is a world-renowned tourist destination. Annual events like the US Open of Surfing and Surf City Half Marathon draw hundreds of thousands of visitors. Huntington Beach is also enjoying an increase in conventions and meetings, and has expanded the number of available hotel rooms along Pacific Coast Highway. A limited number of other lower-cost lodging options are available, and ongoing provision of a variety of lodging options to ensure visitors of all income levels can enjoy the coast is a top priority of the Coastal Act A healthy tourist and hospitality economy also requires a robust service economy. Goal LU-14. Huntington Beach continues to attract visitors and provides a variety of attractions and accommodations during their stay. Policies A. Encourage expansion of the range and location of available lodging for both tourist and business visitors. B. Encourage both coastal and inland visitor-serving uses to offer a wide spectrum of opportunities for residents and visitors. C. Improve the availability of affordable housing and accessible transportation options for service workers. D. Facilitate the provision of transit and bicycling linkages between the various tourist destinations which help encourage local residents and visitors to minimize the use of automobiles. E. Support a concert/entertainment venue within the city. 2-40 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) me arcuiation introduction and Purpose / s ;... Huntington Beach is an active, lively community that recognizes its circulation system is something more than just roads and the cars that drive on them. The city's multimodal system includes bikeways,equestrian trails, sidewalks and jogging paths, and waterways. Public transit services transport people within the planning area and to more distant destinations, using regional services provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Ensuring that mobility options in Huntington Beach remain diverse and efficient is both a fundamental goal and a necessity as concerns about air quality, greenhouse gas emissions,and the accessibility of transportation options to all members of the community grow. The Circulation Element describes and directs how people, goods, and services move within and through Huntington Beach. Through goals and policies contained in this element, the City guides how the circulation system will be shaped to respond to the needs and desires of the community. These needs and desires include reducing and preventing traffic congestion, providing for safe active transportation, and planning for new transit opportunities. Huntington Beach is a dynamic city, and the Circulation Element provides the means for the circulation system to adapt to dynamic conditions. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-1 Accomplishing these objectives requires effective land use planning, roadway monitoring and improvement, transportation system and demand management, regional coordination, and commitment of significant personnel resources. The policies and programs in this element emphasize a balanced, multimodal transportation system that responds to the demands of current and planned land uses identified in the Land Use Element. Cope and Content The Circulation Element is a mandatory component of the General Plan. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65302(b), the City must address major thoroughfares, transportation routes and various means of travel, terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the Land Use Element. Huntington Beach has chosen to address utilities within the Public Services and Infrastructure Element. In addition, Assembly Bill (AB) 1358, the Complete Streets Act of 2008, requires that cities and counties identify how they will provide for the routine accommodation of all users of roadways,including motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists,individuals with disabilities, seniors, and users of public transportation. Planning and building Complete Streets is one way cities and counties can meet this requirement. A complete street is a transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to enable access for all roadway users. The Circulation Element consists of this Introduction and Purpose identifying the intent of the element, how it relates to other documents, and metrics commonly used to measure traffic flow; a Circulation Plan designating locations and standards for roadways and non- motorized circulation facilities, and stating the community's desired level of transportation service; and Issues, Goals, and Policies, which provide strategies to maintain and enhance Huntington Beach's dynamic circulation system. The element addresses the physical circulation system consisting of streets, highways, bicycle routes, equestrian facilities, paths, and sidewalks,as well as available modes of transportation, including cars, buses, bicycles, and walking. How efficiently goods and people move about in a community is one of the most imperative issues a locality must address, as it affects land use, economic vitality, urban design, energy consumption, air quality, and ultimately, the city's infrastructure. Circulation decisions cannot be addressed solely at the local level, however; they must be coordinated with regional, state, and federal agencies, as well as with neighboring communities. -41 � 3 3-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Relationship to tither General Plan Elements State planning law requires that the Circulation Element be consistent with other General Plan elements. As circulation affects such a wide range of issues,consistency with other elements is especially important. The elements most closely linked with the Circulation Element are Land Use and Noise. The Land Use Element identifies the development --- potential of vacant or underutilized properties throughout the city, which is a major factor in developing future traffic volume estimates that are used to evaluate roadway adequacy in the Circulation Element. The transportation policies found in the Circulation Element are also directly linked to the programs and policies in the Noise Element, since transportation facilities users are largely responsible for excessive noise levels in certain locations in the community. Projected noise distributions, depicted as noise contours in the Noise Element, are in turn related to the Circulation Element. Policies and plans contained in the Noise Element are largely based on the Circulation Element and are aimed at minimizing the effects of transportation noise on current and planned land uses. The Natural Resources and Conservation Element is also related to this element, as it addresses air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Circulation Plan Huntington Beach's circulation network consists of roadways, transit services, multiuse trails, waterways, bikeways, and air traffic from the various heliports in the city. Other facilities such as park-and-ride lots, transit shelters, bicycle racks and lockers,and public and private parking facilities support these methods of travel. Similarly, the overall circulation system supports the movement of goods and services via the various components of that system. Measuring Traffic Flow Roadway networks must be regularly evaluated to ensure they are moving vehicles efficiently and maintaining adequate capacity to support future growth. This element uses specific approaches to measure and describe traffic flow and roadway capacity. They involve a policy component with respectto desirable level of service(LOS)and vehicle miles traveled(VMT),and a technical component that outlines the criteria involved. Volume-to-Capacity Ratio The volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio indicates how many vehicles travel on a roadway (volume) and the number of vehicles the roadway can carry (capacity). V/C ratios are calculated based on current or future traffic volumes and capacity values for various types , of roadway facilities.Volume is established either by a traffic count(in the case of current volumes)or by a forecast for a future condition. Capacity is a critical component of roadway design. The higher the V/C ratio (approaching or above 1.00), the more congested the 3' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-3 roadway becomes. For example, a roadway that carries 1,000 vehicles per hour but has the capacity to accommodate 2,000 vehicles per hour at free flow speed has a V/C of 0.50, which drivers would experience as"free-flowing,"with only minor delays. The V/C ratio is used to reflect intersection performance through the intersection capacity utilization (ICU). This measure is applied using peak-hour volumes and the geometric configuration of traffic signal controlled intersections.The ICU sums the V/C ratios for the critical movements of an intersection, and thus accounts for the overall performance of intersections, which is typically the portion of the system that most influences the overall operations within a roadway system. Level of Service LOS is a tool used to describe the operating characteristics of the street system in terms of the level of congestion or delay experienced by vehicles. Service levels range from A through F, with each level defined by a range of V/C ratios, as shown in Table CIRC-1. LOS A, B, and C are considered good operating conditions, with only minor delays being experienced by motorists. LOS D represents operating conditions where drivers occasionally have to wait through more than one signal cycle to proceed through the intersection. LOS E is considered a near-capacity condition, and LOS F represents an oversaturated condition with long delays. The LOS designations are based upon ICU values calculated for intersections. Table CIIC-1 Peak Hour Level of Service Descriptions for Intersections Low volumes; high speeds, speed not restricted by other vehicles; all signal A cycles clear with no vehicles waiting through more than one signal cycle. 0.00-0.60 ------ --........____..-----..._..------ --- --- —- - ----------- - --------- Operating speeds beginning to be affected by other traffic; between one and B 10 percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehicles which wait through 0.61-0.70 more than one signal cycle during peak traffic periods. Operating speeds and maneuverability closely controlled by other traffic; between 11 and 30 percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehicles C which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak traffic periods; 0.71-0.80 recommended ideal design standards. Tolerable operating speeds;31 to 70 percent of the signal cycle have one or D more vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak 0.81-0.90 traffic periods;often used as design standard in urban areas. Capacity;the maximum traffic volume an intersection can accommodate; restricted speeds; 71 to 100 percent of the signal cycles have one or more E vehicles which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak traffic 0.91-1.00 periods. Long queues of traffic; unstable flow; stoppages of long duration;traffic F volume and traffic speed can drop to zero;traffic volume will be less than the Above 1.00 volume which occurs at level of service E. Source:Highway Capacity Manual2000,Transportation Research Board,National Research Council 3-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Vehicle Miles Traveled SB 743 was passed by the state legislature in 2013. Among other topics,it discusses haw transportation impacts are addressed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Currently, an environmental impact report addresses impacts to traffic congestion and delays. SB 743 requires the Office of Planning and Research to update the State CEQAGuidelines sothat impacts are instead measured by the predicted change in VMT rather than the change in LOS. This method allows for better calculation of the greenhouse gas and energy impacts. Local jurisdictions may still use LOS in making planning decisions, but it cannot be included as part of the CEQA process.This may result in significant changes to the way transportation systems are designed and operated in cities. The City of Huntington Beach will utilize VMT or a similar metric as a CEQA threshold of significance,while still maintaining the best possible traffic flow by assessing proposed development or reuse project impacts to LOS as a part of determining a project's consistency with the General Plan. Providing additional transportation mode options could improve LOS for vehicle travel, while also decreasing VMT for single-occupant vehicles. The benefits of having a variety of travel options are numerous. Having access to public transit, cycling,and walking options increases the opportunity for residents to navigate the community and fulfill the necessary aspects of everyday life, regardless of age, ability, or economic status. Multiple options also provide individuals with greater choice and control over their mobility, and support a physically and socially active lifestyle. In addition, increased travel options have the potential to reduce automobile traffic, reduce greenhouse gas emissions,and minimize the need for large, multilane roadways and busy neighborhood streets. Land Use Plan and Forecast The Circulation Element is designed to meet transportation needs based on assumptions about the intensity and location of development from the Land Use Plan. In turn, the Land Use Plan was developed through an iterative process with the Circulation Plan to ensure that the transportation network can meet the needs of proposed land uses. Anticipated future development consistent with General Plan land use designations is presented in the Land Use Element. With implementation of the General Plan, up to 7,228 additional dwelling units and approximately 5.4 million additional nonresidential square feet could be constructed in the planning area. This additional development would result in the addition of approximately 148,000 average daily vehicle trips to roadways within the planning area. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-5 Regional Mobility a Orange County has seen rapid growth since the 1990s, and is projected to have continued growth well into the 21st century. Regional transportation strategies are needed to successfully implement City and County plans accommodating future growth. These strategies must link Huntington Beach to other regional employment and commercial centers,as well as airports and transportation hubs, and should prominently feature alternative modes of travel to the automobile. Currently, regional and interregional roadway access is provided by a system of freeways and arterials. The San Diego Freeway(1-405) is the major north—south freeway,traversing the northeastern portion of the planning area. Pacific Coast Highway (SR 1) extends parallel to the coast on the western portion of the planning area. Pacific Coast Highway provides regional access to the City of Newport Beach to the south and the City of Seal Beach to the north, as well as points beyond. OCTA provides local transit service and regional transit connections between the city and other areas of the county and region. OCTA provides a variety of transit services including bus service, passenger rail, and mobility services for those with special needs. OCTA continues to develop new transit alternatives to improve regional mobility. Regional transportation plans and programs address regional and local transit, bicycle routes, and improved accessibility for Huntington Beach to and from points east of the Santa Ana River. Resolving these regional issues will require coordination between Huntington Beach, the County, and neighboring jurisdictions. Complete Streets Complete Streets are streets that accommodate all modes of travel in a convenient manner for all users. Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities must be able to move along and across a complete street in a relatively safe manner. Complete Streets help facilitate a variety of important community benefits, including the following: Complete Streets provide travel choices and give people the option to use alternative modes of transportation. Complete Streets encourage healthy physical activity. Public health experts promote walking and bicycling to combat obesity, especially in children. 3-6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) • Complete Streets can lead to economic revitalization by reducing transportation costs and travel time while increasing property values and job growth in communities. • Thoughtful design and accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians reduces the incidence of crashes and improves safety for all transportation users. • Complete Streets foster strong communities where all people feel welcome on the road and where walking and bicycling are an important part of improving public transportation and creating friendly, walkable neighborhoods. Making a street more complete could include installing or improving sidewalks, adding bike or dedicated bus lanes, or maintaining frequent and visible crosswalks, roundabouts, or any number of other design features that suit the location and maintain or improve overall transportation flow. The City of Huntington Beach has built the vast majority of streets utilizing the Complete Streets approach, and expanding the Complete Streets efforts would require retrofit or redesign of existing streets. In addition to providing ways to travel, and creating places for people, Huntington Beach's streets also provide access to private property and public sewer, water, electrical, and storm drain utilities. The Local Road System Roadways in Huntington Beach are generally laid out on a north—south, east—west trending i grid system.The grid system becomes slightly '- modified in the Downtown area, where roadways trend northeast—southwest, and in the Huntington Harbour and Sunset Beach ` areas. As shown later in the Arterial Highway "I'll Plan, the local roadway system is organized in ',�" Ii��' ��i��i a hierarchical fashion, based on the grid system. However, due to natural barriers such as the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, the Santa Ana River, the Pacific Ocean, and the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station, the grid system becomes discontinuous. This results in circuitous and somewhat limited access to certain locations, such as access to Pacific Coast Highway from north-central Huntington Beach, or access across the Santa Ana `'.. River from the southeast. r City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-7 Roadways are not equal in function or in their service of different travel modes. Major and primary arterials, like Warner Avenue or Goldenwest Street, must effectively balance the needs of both automobiles and mass transit vehicles in order to keep drivers from using adjacent neighborhood streets to avoid traffic. Secondary arterials like Newland Street or Slater Avenue still accommodate significant automobile traffic while also balancing the needs of more direct local access,on-street parking, and increased nonmotorized modes of transportation. Collector streets like Delaware Street or Orange Avenue are more supportive of other modes and uses, such as bicycles. Finally, local streets are mixed environments where all users interact, and the parkways and sidewalk areas can be used for recreation or gathering. Roadway Types The local street system is composed of various-sized roadways that allow for mobility from point-to-point and access to properties. Roads generally emphasize either mobility or access. In Huntington Beach, roadways are classified as follows: • Freeway • Primary Arterial • Smart Street Arterial • Secondary Arterial • Principal Arterial • Collector Arterial • Major Arterial • Local Street Some roadway types have a standard cross section for use in selected areas. The standard roadway classifications and key mobility and access characteristics of each are described in the following paragraphs. Typical non-intersection cross sections are illustrated in Figure CIRC-1.Additional rights-of-way(beyond the standard width) may be required at higher volume intersections and to accommodate turning movements. Freeways Freeways are limited access, high- speed, divided travelways of six d f lanes or more. Access is provided �� at strategically spaced, grade- separated on- and off-ramps. 1-405 w provides regional freeway access at a number of interchanges in or adjacent to the city. Freeway design standards are dictated by Caltrans, District 12, and the Federal Highway Administration. ^ Any interchange improvements must be coordinated with and approved by Caltrans. 3-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) VW u a } 3 S s u smArrs L r j NAMOR ARTERIAL u -g Fa C t PRIMARY ARTERULL(DIYWED) A— "Ysd 6 re SECONDAIM ARTERM(UNDMUD) .......... ........... ............ .. ............ COLLECTOR STREET(LtJDMDWJ Typical Roadway Crass Sections Figure CIRC-1 F City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) r 3-9 Smart Street Arterials Smart street arterials are six-to eight-lane roadways with enhanced capacity compared to a standard arterial street. Smart streets are designated by OCTA as important regional routes and improved with Measure M funds to increase traffic capacity and flow through using techniques such as signal synchronization, bus turnouts, intersection improvements, driveway consolidation, and prohibition of on-street parking. Traffic-carrying capacities of smart streets can range from 60,000 to 79,000 vehicles per day,depending on the number of lanes, degree of access control, peak-period loading, and configurations of major intersections. Beach Boulevard is designated as a smart street arterial by OCTA. Beach Boulevard (SR 39) and Pacific Coast Highway(SR 1) are under Caltrans'sjurisdiction. Principal Arterials Principal arterials act as main thoroughfares and provide access to major activity centers and the regional freeway system. Principal arterials are typically eight-lane roadways featuring raised or striped medians. Desirable minimum spacing for street intersections along a principal arterial is approximately one-quarter mile. Unsignalized minor street and driveway access may be allowed, but signalized access is preferred and left-turn restrictions are typically planned at unsignalized access locations. Curbside parking is prohibited. Traffic-carrying capacities of±65,000 vehicles per day can be achieved depending on the degree of access control, peak-period loadings, and lane configurations at major intersections. While the City does not currently have any principal arterials, this classification is part of the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways,and could be used for later reclassifications if appropriate. Principal arterials can be designated as smart streets with the appropriate capacity enhancements, as the two classifications are not mutually exclusive. Maior Arterials Major arterials are high-capacity six-lane roadways with painted or raised landscaped medians. Left-turn restrictions at minor unsignalized driveways enhance vehicle flow. Curbside parking is usually not appropriate along some of the more heavily traveled major arterial streetsegments in the city. Maximum servicevolumes of±50,000 vehicles per day can be achieved, depending on the degree of access control,intersection operations, and peak-period loadings. 3-10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Major arterials can be designated as smart streets with the appropriate capacity enhancements, and so these two classifications are not mutually exclusive. Primary Arterials Primary arterials are four-lane divided roadways carrying local and regional commute traffic. Unsignalized minor street and driveway access may be allowed, but signalized access is preferred and left-turn restrictions are typically planned at unsignalized access locations. Curbside parking is generally prohibited. Maximum service volumes of±35,000 vehicles per day can be achieved depending on the degree of access control, peak-period loadings, and lane configurations at the major intersections. Secondary Arterials Secondary arterials are four-lane roadways without medians. Direct access from private residential properties to secondary arterials should be avoided where possible unless medians can be provided at such access points. While secondary arterials have curbside parking, localized circumstances could warrant parking restrictions, such as prohibiting parking near intersections where left-turn lane striping is provided. In some locations, secondary arterials may include a limited median or be restriped to provide a left-turn pocket.Maximum service volumes of±25,000 vehicles per day can be achieved depending on the degree of access allowed, intersection operations, and peak-period traffic loadings. Collector Arterials Collector arterials provide access to local streets from the arterial roadway network. Collectors are typically two-lane roadways that sometimes feature painted medians for left-turn movements. Collectors allow curbside parking. Parking should be restricted near intersection approaches where a separate right-turn lane is provided. Maximum service volumes of ±12,500 vehicles per day can be achieved depending on the degree of access control and peak-period traffic loadings. Augmented Roadways The augmented designation for arterial street classifications provides flexibility for customizing sections of roadway while retaining the basic qualities of the classification such as the minimum number of lanes. Whether for aesthetic or capacity reasons, the intent is to allow these arterials to be compatible with their localized settings, providing a context-sensitive approach to the actual design parameters. Examples include the type and size of medians, the size and use of parkways,and in some cases,auxiliary lanes to facilitate local access. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-11 Local Streets Local streets are two-lane roadways without medians. Centerline striping is typically not provided, and curbside parking is generally allowed. Traffic-carrying capacity is physicaly similar to a collector; however, the qualitative limit of acceptable traffic volumes in a residential environment is lower(less than 5,000 vehicles per day). Local streets are not shown on the Arterial Highway Plan. Table CIRC-2 summarizes the function, typical width, access constraints,and maximum volumes for each roadway type. Table CIRC-2 Roadway Characteristics by Type High-capacity arterial roadways featuring enhanced traffic signal 6 to 8 lanes with raised or Smart synchronization, bus bays, Variable painted median Street intersection improvements, and ROW and additional 79,000 Arterial additional travel lanes. Direct access (120'-144') turn lanes at to adjacent properties is discouraged, intersections except at signalized intersections. Main thoroughfares providing access 8 lanes with to major activity centers and the raised or Principal regional freeway system. Direct ' ' painted median Arterial access to adjacent properties is 120/104 and additional 65,000 discouraged,except at signalized turn lanes at intersections. intersections Major arterials complement the 6 lanes with principal system by providing a raised or Major medium-capacity backbone system. painted median Arterial Only limited access is provided, 120'/104' and additional 50,000 typically to commercial properties turn lanes at and not to residential properties. intersections Roadways intended to carry traffic between local streets and principal or 4 lanes divided, Primary major arterials.They are similar to 100'/84' with turn lanes 35,000 Arterial major arterials,with only limited as needed access to adjacent properties. Roadways intended to carry traffic 4 lanes Secondary between local streets and principal or undivided,with major arterials.They are similar to 80/64 25,000 Arterial turn lanes as major arterials,with only limited access to adjacent properties. needed Collector Roadways providing property access 2 lanes and linking properties to secondary, Varies 12,500 Arterial major,and principal arterials. undivided 3-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) U Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan The sections of Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue that fall within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan area have cross sections that are unique to the Specific Plan (for example, different lane configurations and median landscaping) and which allow for deviation from the standard cross sections described in Table CIRC-2. Arterial Highway Plan Circulation Element goals, policies, and implementation programs emphasize the need to provide a circulation system capable of serving current and future local and regional traffic. The planning horizon for the roadway system is 2040. The City's Arterial Highway Plan is illustrated in Figure CIRC-2 and has been developed to accommodate anticipated volumes in 2040. Relationship to County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) The plan depicted in Figure CIRC-2 is the required initial plan that must be consistentwith the current OCTA MPAH. Several amendments to the MPAH and, subsequently, the Arterial Highway Plan are recommended to be pursued. The recommended amendments to the current MPAH are depicted in Figure CIRC-3. Coordination with OCTA to pursue the MPAH amendments is required before any changes can be made to the City's adopted plan. Each amendment will be evaluated in cooperation with OCTA and other affected agencies prior to a final decision regarding amendment of the MPAH. As MPAH amendments are approved by OCTA,administrative amendments to the Arterial Highway Plan will be made when consistent with the recommendations identified in Figure CIRC-3. Principal and Secondary Intersections As a result of the way Huntington Beach's road network has been developed, many trips funnel through a few key intersections. If these intersections fail to operate at adopted performance standards,this failure seriously impacts the overall effectiveness of the entire roadway system. Such locations are defined as "principal intersections" and "secondary intersections." Principal intersections have been designated as such because they are considered to have strategic importance within the overall Arterial Highway Plan. Principal and secondary intersections are critical to the function of the entire network and are regularly monitored and given priority for roadway improvements. Principal and secondary intersections will be identified in the Technical Administrative Report and will be amended based on annual review and reporting of conditions. Action involved in changing intersection designations (principal to secondary or secondary to principal) involves administrative review and approval by the Planning Commission. A General Plan Amendment is not required for such changes. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-13 m � TO of (0 y � Westminster -. ✓ Q) 6efsaAvs ' a d McPadden; v Ed' Ave Htinfingfgn .a Half Ave Ckylot a _ rt ��sn1..-, tire ; _ ... ,....' 'tei �J- TaVxdAvt . 'G"'✓ � Ellis an Ave °c m ca ,@ SGotfie&iAve { ��oJ a Yorkhsvm Ave' fAdeinsAve'•. i 41anaptiis Ave �* Wfanta Ave LEGEND Af 5� Existing Circulation -Maior 1,6lane divided) r_ HatTaltan Ave -Pnmery(4 lane divided) - L4a ' -_-Augmented Primary(added cepacdy) 0/� r �. nning Ave -Secmday 14 tone Imdivided) �"'� �` a t -Cadecor(2 lane undNided) cj. 1j -Augmented Coaector(added cap") tip +w•Proposed Pmnary ' tea, aMORM s Raserved Right of Way State Facility Planning Area UJ Nan-htoarporated land WYr&ar Planning Area Gate Sourca:Data eomplkd by PMC{2aW ease Nap Source:city of Huntingma Beach(2afq seacd�r Arterial Highway Plan Figure CIRC- �' 3-14 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) city Of ay of Seat Beach _ ° {eltastr Balsa/Sv McFaWenAn W_ Ed6nger Ave Htintirtgton `��HaiDovit HeiYAve � &� CRY of F, Fount ln,Vyatl Y i� � Wa rAve v � 5la4erAve � 'Cato raii>alt Ave Boom Cftfca v' Ave E .` �, batlFetd AUe erg` YorMOM Ave Adams Ave trtdianepolisAve AUantaAve' �� t HamifonAve LEGEND 5 r nirg Ave Downgrade to Primary 5ti .a....... Downgrade to Collector on MPAH, A ''� Cf Augmented Facility on Arterial Hwy Plan C" '� Costa Mesa Delete from MPAH5� Major City Streets .E �•�• City Units 0 0.5 1 R E t r 1 r 1 NILES 6al�Bmaxe Data.—t-I tv Bf/nted: Ease MaPSaNCE CdY a<ftnongtan Beach t24t4) yy...t 4 Beach' Proposed MPAH Amendments Figure G RC-3 t MENEM& 1 e City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017 f 3-15 The standard right-of-way and roadway widths specified in Table CIRC-2 will vary on approaches to intersections to accommodate intersection improvements, such as auxiliary turn lanes and/or dual-left turn lanes. Parking will typically be restricted on the approaches to principal and secondary intersections to ensure adequate space to develop such improvements. Critical Intersections One further intersection definition is "critical intersection," which is recommended for isolated cases where the long-range LOS is projected to be worse than the desired threshold and no feasible improvements are identified (see discussion on LOS below). The intent is that such locations be monitored over time. Performance Criteria Performance standards for intersections involve a policy component, the desired LOS, and a technical component that involves the assumptions and procedures used to determine the LOS. The LOS standards are set by the City of Huntington Beach (Policy CIRC 1.13),exceptin the case of Orange County Congestion Management Program(CMP) intersections. The lowest acceptable performance standard for CMP intersections is LOS E. Seven CMP intersections are located in Huntington Beach: • Beach Boulevard at Adams Avenue • Bolsa Chica Street at Bolsa Avenue • Beach Boulevard at Edinger Avenue • Bolsa Chica Street at Warner Avenue • Beach Boulevard at Pacific Coast • Pacific Coast Highway at Warner Highway Avenue • Beach Boulevard at Warner Avenue Evaluation of volumes, capacities, and levels of service on the City street system are based on peak-hour intersection data since intersections are the primary limiting factor affecting traffic flow on city streets.The LOS standards as established by Policy CIRC-1.13 are as follows: Critical Intersections LOS E Principal Intersections LOS D Secondary Intersections LOS C Included in the principal intersections are the CMP intersections listed above; hence City policy is to achieve LOS D for these CMP intersections, a higher standard than the CMP LOS E requirement. 3-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) The technical procedures used to determine LOS are based on the ICU methodology described earlier. Parameters and criteria used in such calculations will be defined in the Technical Administrative Report, which will be prepared following the adoption of this Circulation Element. Future roadway improvements needed to fully implement the Arterial Highway Plan have been determined through use of a citywide traffic forecasting model maintained by the City. The Technical Administrative Report will list the intersection and roadway improvements required to transition to full implementation of the Arterial Highway Plan. The City will continue to use the five-year CIP process to prioritize, fund, and build these improvements, updating both the CIP and the Technical Administrative Report on an annual basis to reflect current needs,priorities, and financial conditions. New development project mitigation will also be used to address necessary improvements. Relationship to Land Use Planned land uses within Huntington Beach through the year 2040 influence future traffic volumes and highway capacity needs. Baseline(year 2014) daily trip generation within the planning area was around 1,618,820 trips per day, and 148,000 additional trips are anticipated by 2040 (an increase of about 9 percent). The Arterial Highway Plan is designed to accommodate this increase, but will require improvements including new roadway construction, improved transit service, and enforcement of the transportation demand management program. Neighborhood Traffic Management As vehicle traffic in Huntington Beach and the region increases, commuters and locals may look for less-crowded streets for quicker drive times. Drivers may choose to leave congested arterials in favor of local streets, impacting generally quiet residential neighborhoods. In busy commercial areas, employees and visitors may find it easier or less expensive to park in an adjoining neighborhood. Resulting increases in traffic, speeding on local streets, and inadequate parking can disrupt residential neighborhood activities. Preserving the character and safety of neighborhoods is important to the City. Policies aimed at protecting neighborhoods from the negative effects of cut-through traffic and inappropriate parking include residential parking permits, site planning, and traffic-calming measures. Traffic-calming techniques are used to direct traffic elsewhere and slow traffic within neighborhoods. Specific traffic-calming measures will be identified in the neighborhood Technical Administrative Report prepared following adoption of this Circulation Element, and will be updated on an ongoing basis. 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-17 I� Public Transportation Most regional connections from Huntington Beach to locations outside the city are made by personal automobiles. However, there are also many riders who use the public transportation system. Fixed-route and demand-responsive services meet these needs. Fixed-route services are transit lines that operate on regular schedules along a set route. Demand-responsive services have defined service areas but do not operate on fixed routes or schedules. In 2014, OCTA operated 16 routes through the city(see Figure CIRC-4).The number • .�,. , of lines and routes are adjusted as needed in response to ridership patterns. OCTA and the City both operate demand- response services. OCTA operates the ACCESS program. The City,with the aid of OCTA, operates the Senior Services Mobility Program. Two park-and-ride facilities allow commuters to park their personal vehicles at one location and utilize carpools, vanpools, or commuter bus service.The park-and-ride facilities are the Golden West Transportation Center at Gothard Street and Center Avenue, and a large lot at the Boeing Corporation campus at Bolsa Avenue and Bolsa Chica Street. Future Plans The Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way runs east of Gothard Street and extends from the northern city limits to its endpoint just north of Garfield Avenue. Approximately three trains per week use the active portion of the rail line north of Ellis Avenue. The City has designated the abandoned portion of the rail corridor south of Ellis Avenue for a future transportation corridor use. Future development of all or portions of the corridor, including the existing active rail section, for transportation purposes may be pursued by the City in the future. Potential uses include development of a bicycle or multipurpose trail or to function as an exclusive transit corridor. These options may be limited in some areas where portions of the corridor are no longer available for public use. � x 3-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) tt�Y�1 x.FrY•9 JdaF� � ! AP X-41r SIWION44 ri — ♦ al Y rat `.. Seat 7 Beach * � e 21Nn • +.■i .� r 1t 8olsa ve e Mcfadden Ave "ViaMt gra r r r a, r r r m■ 1 dingerAve 7 \`J Huttttngfnn s. M� v a N,"AU, ." �•` tar x Heil v9 '7:: {ilt of c , _ m 72 Fountain Valley' •�. # gterAve 1, ■ 2 +n a 76 m z �. � '`• Tal6 er q i r r■w r A* Tatt�e€tAve `"IAA rMSa f 784 nit III It Ca&�rYeIdAve r4yti 7 f Yotov nAve � � t 178 rfAdams Ave 5 lndianaper live LEGEND — Major City Streets i Atlanta Ave —••— City Limits g h Bus Route , Hamiltw Ave �0� �� —Route1 Route66 �� Banning Ave ••■•Route 21 ■r Route 70a �• t Route 25 Route 72 . city Route 29 •r•Route 76 '` 1 Costa 1e i —Route 33 ■r•Route 178 ��'�•'�,, —Route 35 ■r Route 211 ■•■•Route 64 —Route 701 0 0.5 1 s , MILES , daia 9n .Dot..—o Ndby ft.m"Smur city dH.o0.0 nS..h(MO, arnu�af® Bus Route Map Figure CI C-4 s, City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-19 I� Helistops and Heliports Local heliports are used primarily for air ambulance, business, emergency, and police uses. Heliports are located at the Boeing Corporation (Bolsa Chica Street at Bolsa Avenue), Guardian Center (Beach Boulevard at Warner Avenue), Huntington Beach Police Station (Gothard Street and Talbert Avenue), Cal Resources at Pacific Coast Highway(between Seapoint Street and Warner Avenue), and the Huntington Beach Civic Center(Main Street at Yorktown Avenue). City policy regarding heliports is to ensure that their development and operation are coordinated with the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and to comply with conditions mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration, the ALUC, and Caltrans. Transportation Demand Management and Air Quality Huntington Beach is located within the South Coast Air Basin,which is a nonattainment area with regard to meeting state and federal air quality standards. The City has established a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance to mitigate potential impacts of development projects on mobility, congestion, and air quality. The City uses ordinance requirements and policies in this element to encourage individuals and employers to change their travel behavior. Fewer vehicle trips and miles translate to reduced pollutant emissions. Policies and implementation measures include requiring employers and new developments to provide appropriate transit and pedestrian facilities, encouraging current businesses and new development projects to submit TDM plans, and encouraging the creation of Guaranteed Ride Home and carpool programs. The City also encourages the use of q low- or no-emission vehicles, including hybrids, electric vehicles, or other emerging technologies. One example is low-speed, zero-emission neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs). These vehicles are usually restricted to roads with speeds of 35 mph or less and must be charged approximately every 30 miles. For these reasons, the City encourages businesses to provide charging stations and is investigating alternative roadway systems for NEVs. i B c i uF� 3-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) sue• Parking Huntington Beach is a popular destination for beachgoers and shoppers. Great demand for limited parking in Downtown, at the beach, and at parks, sports fields, high schools, churches,and industrial locations has been a continuing issue for many years. Excessive numbers of vehicles parked on city streets can potentially impede vehicle circulation, reducing the effective capacity of roadways and causing traffic congestion. Residential neighborhoods also experience heavy parking demand when large numbers of visitors use on-street parking, especially during special events. Pursuant to Coastal Act requirements, parking must be maintained within the coastal zone that allows visitors to access the beach and coastal resources. The City operates parking lots and garages in Downtown and near the beach. To reduce associated impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods, the City is committed to developing new parking facilities and programs and continuing to regulate neighborhood parking through residential permit programs. At the same time, the City will explore ways to reduce overall parking requirements when appropriate, in order to minimize the amount of land used for parking and encourage alternative forms of transportation. Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Equestrian Paths and Waterways Accomodating Pedestrians Sidewalks and walking paths allow people to walk easily around most parts of Huntington Beach, particularly in areas such as Downtown, adjacent to the beach, and along portions of Beach Boulevard. Within master-planned neighborhoods, pedestrian paths link homes to recreation facilities. In many other neighborhoods, sidewalks allow children to walk to schools and parks and surrounding uses. The City seeks to improve the pedestrian experience and enhance pedestrian safety. Areas eligible for improvements will be designated as pedestrian enhancement zones (PEZs). PEZ improvements may include widened sidewalks, crosswalks, trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and traffic-calming measures. The City will establish a designation process for PEZs, coordinating with County and regional transportation agencies to assess the need for improved facilities and balance the demand for improved I pedestrian facilities with the need to maintain adequate vehicular traffic flows. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-21 Routes for Bicyclists r Huntington Beach's mild climate r, permits bicycle riding year-round, and the growing popularity of bicycling has drawn enthusiasts onto the streets and bike trails near the beach and throughout the planning area. The bikeway plan shown in Figure CIRC-6 identifies the planned system of bikeways to accommodate growing demand and provide a real alternative to the car for local trips. The plan establishes three classes of bicycle routes: • Class I Bike Paths — Off-road routes located along designated multiuse trails or vacated rail lines separated from streets. • Class II Bike Lanes — On-road routes delineated by painted stripes and other identifying features. • Class III Bike Routes—On-road routes sharing use with pedestrians or motor vehicle traffic that are signed but not striped. Cross sections for each type of route are shown on Figure CIRC-6.Class II and III routes along the north-south and east-west arterials connect to pedestrian trails and Class I routes. Given the built out nature of the city,creating new Class I routes is difficult. Thus, where bicyclists and pedestrians share the road with automobiles, the City will work to meet appropriate traffic safety standards. Equestrian Facilities Huntington Beach, despite its generally suburban character, has managed to retain a few residential neighborhoods near Central Park where the keeping of horses is permitted. To support equestrian activities, the City has required the development of horse trails around and through these neighborhoods with a planned route west to Pacific Coast Highway.Visitors and others also use the trails for rented horses available at the �m Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center. The a center and equestrian trails provide welcome 1 recreation options for residents and others, and the City will retain these facilities as community resources. 3-22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5x N�� rn .• i..._.. ��``� rn pity Of 'City OfWestminster Beach 129 a Boise Ave v xz x MCFadden c ` Z EdingerAve Fiulltmgtonr. ` Harbour �; �ti r v .,Hell Ave • C _ a e Wall fµ Warrte(Avg "... r SlaterAve •� Talbediwe ftttmd§ �• '01' .i' Ellis ` A. A � � ► 'Go lek!Ave r.. t Yo own Ave LEGEND AdamsPve O Santa Ana River Trail Access �• Mapr City Streets • "� �.—— Horse Trails ttapali$Ave� `�•• + Railroads —'--City Limits �� %�, tianfeAve Bike Lane : ' Bike Lane on One Side ^e �`'�:p,, �IHemgton Ave —Bike Lane/Bike Route �eSO 1a\ t —Bike Route . s Multi-Use Pathway —�Proposed Bike BlvdCity of m�\m Proposed Bike Lane •3 i� Proposed Bike Route �¢� �•�. Proposed Mufti-Use wry Q�oo •, '°- Wide Walkway 77 1NtES Dab Source:Daea c p%d by Srolbd . Bam Mao Sm"City of sUmington B•wh JMA) BW Bikeway glen Figure C8 C- � Y City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) €,^ 3-23 - Class 1 Multi-Use Bike Path Provides a completely separated right-of- way for the exclusive use of bicycles and x pedestrians with cross flow by motorists minimized. Dasvipfiom Right-of;"Separated Rom"W%xvehicte traffic Used where adWent K06 ay tpeedsand the +ohmieoftratrx is toot r for sae shared uft gird fcrmnnec*—th-whopenspace `a-dpA'K— Wherencrcrher€acil±2ytype s*,aqbic, eosi a-rzasn ;c .y Dirsi nG&Adolimm t EightfccA paved vrnihmasfo tgradededg=rrirumanr mdthfartvmwayuse Cxeaterwidthlsrecvmmez iftaa h�{Et rasesmrtdors •Bike patiss adjazentq a trgtwvay awfoser dsarr feet i'rarrr tfieedge of the shmMer shag imiudea physxal barrier such as rack dense shrubs ortrees, Nstamocas: Cancans titghvass'DmIgn Manua Chapter MOO 3012 Class 2 Bike Lane Provides a striped lane for one-way bike gavel on a street or highway. Dascriptk m providesa striped tame firs ww bike s-' traW4 on,a street or higtwwy:tnstaued aforo steets in conichiswime them issgir .antbkyclederraarttl,and s herethere are rkslinci needs,that can be served bythern. to streets with on-stmeE pa6mg,bike lair-s are tocstxoi ivt between fire pariong amis aced the traffic lairat, ea€a�eaaca�e wz*9 ..__ f?irsign Grtadrrtnasa f'rrc fact rninimumvO&h forhiite tares located betsuem ir parking are and traffic carves. E k r Ftrur foot minimumwkhhifnogatWmparkeredshs tWudinlar"mat two foot roAtet,minmumt retar* — idtXrsRatt befnrtfeet g BIKE LANE eaf¢ nc i a Sfntd8ltt£ CashwdYsrtrf�C €4k7 axKIMAllrTa ig 'a+irer iris' Lava a taste i s Class 3 Bike Route Provides for shared use of the roadway with motor vehicle traff9t. Das<riptmrc fdlrrthin saetiiaai1ac rrck ot"way,delineated bydiirectivnat:stgrrage.Used where—d% speeds and traffic vo[u nis are fancy low and sixxddff prsrrkfes adequate mom.84e fb ums*wkatt to cyc vAstfiat. tune we particulff admWitamto ustrsg these routes cm pared to akernatimmutes. V*Sifin GWd®E itrat wr�aasa�raars¢rmagasa : .019taka•ihanstandardmnskfetarensresmerd '' 's' =='",'_ _ •Becaarae�pe#istsarcperrnitedairaksc+adwaYstexc�st r� pe+�fsdrrted frcers3aXsi,taicyctc mufrz strorzides a '�� l.:lf)4w.J�C�Gy► j fttghrrde' ofservrrrrthano#mssraets MAY USE FULL LANE s:f.rarrt ��, H-:,,;'' � c�fttarsfastrvr�Drf�rrrxxf serrr�r� CaWm7da MtneD2013 ,�' 8fififilt$tf#p Death Bikeway Cross Sections Figure CRC-6 fl `' 3-24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Boating Given the city's coastal location, Huntington Beach residents take advantage of its local waterways largely for recreation from Huntington Harbour, Sunset Channel, and the Orange County Sunset Aquatic Marina. Additional future uses could include ferries to employment centers or water taxis. The City supports and encourages private development of such waterborne transportation options. Scenic Corridors The practice of identifying scenic corridors and routes was introduced by the state of California in the 1960s as a way to protect the aesthetic value of lands adjacent to highways. In Huntington Beach, this practice has been extended to cover corridors that the City has determined to have notable aesthetic appeal for the community. Caltrans defines scenic corridors as lands generally adjacent to and visible from the highway, using a motorist's line of vision. Scenic corridors in Huntington Beach consist of roads that offer motorists, cyclists,and pedestrians attractive vistas and pleasing street scenes. Though not officially designated by the state, Pacific Coast Highway in Sunset Beach is an informal "Scenic Highway,"which is effectively the equivalent of a major urban scenic corridor. The City has established policies regarding treatment of scenic corridor rights-of-way, selection criteria for appropriate surrounding land uses, and rigorous development review procedures to protect the aesthetic appeal of these corridors. rFr z, r= 2 s 8 1 t r City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-25 The City defines three types of scenic corridors: • Major Urban Scenic Corridors— Major corridors offering views of either natural or built environments. Development may be regulated to preserve views within the coastal zone, and landscaping and detailing are required to reinforce the aesthetic beauty of the surrounding area. Major urban scenic corridors are prominent, signature boulevards conveying arrival and identity, and in many cases will connect with adjacent cities. • Minor Urban Scenic Corridors—Minor corridors terminate within the city boundaries and typically carry less traffic than major corridors. Development may be regulated to preserve views within the coastal zone, and landscaping and detailing are required to reinforce the aesthetic beauty of the surrounding area. • Landscape Corridors — Corridors requiring specific treatment of signage, landscaping, or other details to reinforce the design continuity of the area. Scenic corridors are regulated by design standards summarized in Table CIRC-3. Table CIRC- Summary of Scenic Corridor Development Requirements II • Utilities to consist of underground facilities Urban Prohibit off-site signs and billboards Scenic a Require open space easements for natural areas adjacent to corridor Corridors Require adjacent developments to incorporate compatible landscaping (Major and . Other design requirements as specified in the Land Use Element Minor) a Utilize the City's Design Review Board to evaluate developments within designated scenic corridors Landscape 6 Prohibit off-site signs and billboards Corridors Require adjacent developments to incorporate compatible/increased landscaping • Other design requirements as specified in the Land Use Element There are several intersections along the edges of Huntington Beach that serve as entry points to the various scenic corridors in the community. These intersections, known as entry nodes, are key locations that help to demarcate the corridor and set it apart from the surrounding areas. There are 11 primary entry nodes and 5 secondary entry nodes in Huntington Beach. The locations of the scenic corridors and entry nodes are shown in Figure CIRC-7. 3-26 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Transportation and Urban Runoff The quality and quantity of stormwater runoff flowing into the Santa Ana River and Pacific Ocean are regulated by the State of California. Urban environments such as Huntington Beach contain expanses of impervious surfaces that prevent stormwater from percolating into the ground; instead, runoff drains lead directly to the river or ocean. The circulation system—comprising sidewalks, roads, and parking lots—makes up a large proportion of the impervious surface acreage in the planning area and resulting pollution. Many of the pollutants entering the stormwater system are byproducts of motor vehicles, including gas and oil. To responsibly address the water quality impacts of urban runoff, and to meet Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit requirements,theCitywill continueto require mitigation of potential impacts of transportation-related sources of water pollution, particularly in urban runoff. y E City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-27 NAA trA cityOf cjty of > Westminster Salsa Ate N m ze r � Moi`'adtlen 3 fiNe • _ Ed}nWAve Hentmgrort 4; FleflAve 27 of FountainValley c -�:......� Shafer Ave ' eaba Chico ._ _......... Talbert Ave Garfield eve �g Yorkkmo Ave Adams Am lanapoftAve "'` Ailarde Ave LEGEND Hamiton Ave. — Major City Streets ` b R e+ —••_ Chy Limfts nrr€ngAve Major Urban Scenic Corridor • 001 Minor Urban Scenic Corridor � city 0 E•■ Landscape Corridor �1° 'a Primary Entry Node Secondary Entry Node Y 0 0.5 1 s MLES DataSaprs¢Daiwa mraeday an�r &nrR Map Sourer'CRy p(HmnlRlglpn 9each t;YQ4d: '� HIlIl�IN31tN1N SC Sceni Highway Plea Figure - ,q/ 3-28 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) , and PoRcles The circulation issues addressed in this element include: • Maintaining adequate level of service • Providing adequate Downtown and beach parking • Enhancing regional transit • Increasing local transit options • Ensuring mobility options for all users • Enhancing bicycle,pedestrian, equestrian, and waterway options • Protecting and developing scenic corridors • Providing for alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure • Ensuring access for emergency vehicles Maintaining Adequate Level of Service While the City has generally maintained adequate levels of service overtime, congestion occurs at some key intersections and on several arterial roadways during commute hours, on the weekends, and during the tourist season. The City does not control operations on some roadways,such as Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, as they are under Caltrans jurisdiction. Maintaining adequate levels of service enhances quality of life for Huntington Beach residents, promotes traffic safety, and improves the ability of emergency service providers to respond to emergency situations. Goal CIRC-1a. The circulation system supports existing, approved. and planned land uses while maintaining a desired level of service and capacity on streets and at critical intersections. Goal CIRC-1b. The implementation of citywide systems and driver applications, such as vehicle detection. traffic signal coordination, collision avoidance systems, traffic calming measures, and emergency or traffic notification systems, creates a duality circulation system. Goal CIRC-1c. Through ongoing evaluation of jurisdiction, efficient transportation management provides the highest level of safety,service. and resources. Policies A. Develop and maintain the city street network and pursue completion of missing roadway ', links identified on the Arterial Highway Plan (Figure CIRC-2) and standard roadway cross �p City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-29 .w. sections (Figure CIRCA), including appropriate roadway widths, medians, and bicycle lanes. B. Maintain the following adopted performance standards for citywide level of service for traffic-signal-controlled intersections during peak hours. a. Locations with specific characteristics identified as critical intersections: LOS E (ICU to not exceed 1.00) b. Principal Intersections: LOS D (0.81-0.90 ICU) c. Secondary Intersections: LOS C (0.71-0.80 ICU) C. Monitor the capacity of principal intersections. When principal intersections approach or have reached unacceptable levels of service, consider elevating the priority of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects that reduce traffic congestion at these intersections. D. Require additional right-of-way and restrict parking on segments adjacent to principal intersections to allow for future intersection improvements and turning movements as needed to satisfy performance standards. E. Maintain compliance with the OCTA Congestion Management Program or any subsequent replacement program. F. Require development projects to provide circulation improvements to achieve stated City goals and to mitigate to the maximum extent feasible traffic impacts to adjacent land uses and neighborhoods as well as vehicular conflicts related to the project. G. Limit driveway access points, require driveways to be wide enough to accommodate traffic flow from and to arterial roadways, and establish mechanisms to consolidate driveways where feasible and necessary to minimize impacts to the smooth, efficient,and controlled flow of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. H. Protect residential neighborhoods from adverse conditions associated with cut-through and nonresidential traffic. I. Pursue technological innovations to ensure Huntington Beach has the best available traffic management systems. J. Investigate current jurisdictional control of roadways and determine where adjustments may be made in the future. Providing Adequate Downtown and Beach Parking Parking can be a challenge in Downtown throughout the year, but especially during the high tourist season and special events. Street parking and Downtown parking structures are the current primary parking options. While drivers circulate looking for available parking spaces, congestion increases. This congestion may diminish the visitor experience. 3-30 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Goal CIRC-2.Parking is easy for both residents and visitors to locate, and provided in sufficient quantity to handle peak parking times such as tourist season and special events. Policies A. Provide enhanced wayfinding signs to direct users toward existing parking areas. B. Evaluate options for increased parking in Downtown and beach areas and determine the best method to accommodate future parking demand. Off-site parking locations in tandem with parking shuttles should be investigated as part of this strategy. C. Establish a parking management program and require that new development projects supply parking that supports anticipated demands. D. Allow for shared parking and other creative parking arrangements that optimize available parking areas, and support and collaborate with property owners to manage the available parking supply. identify rideshare service opportunities that could reduce parking demand, where feasible. Enhancing Regional Transit Enhancing regional transit connections would improve access and mobility for residents and visitors and could reduce vehicle miles traveled, traffic congestion, and parking limitations in the community. Goal CIRC-3a. Convenient and efficient connections between regional transit and areas of employment, shopping,recreation,and housing will increase ridership and active mobility, with a focus on first/last mile solutions. Goal CIRC-3b. The City is positioned to expand transit, through a long-range strategy that allows the City to carry out transportation goals as funding and infrastructure are feasible. Policies A. Pursue an urban transit system that serves Huntington Beach, and evaluate local and regional transit service to identify areas of opportunity for existing regional transit linkages. B. Ensure that local transit is reliable and safe, and provides high-quality service to and from regional transit and destination areas. C. Use the best available transit technology to streamline and link destinations and improve -` rider convenience and safety. D. Require new projects to contribute to the transit and/or active transportation network in proportion to their expected traffic generation. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-31 E. Include or promote multimodal transit centers and stops that allow for seamless connections between regional and local transit systems, pedestrian and bicycle networks, and commercial and employment centers. F. Explore the possibility of locating a transportation center in or near Downtown. Increasing Local Transit Options Existing local bus service has been characterized as limited and slow. A negative perception of the transit system dissuades ridership, and current ridership levels do not warrant expanded routes or frequencies. Because driving remains the preferred travel mode for most residents and visitors, creating a successful local transit system will be challenging. Still, Huntington Beach can take steps to improve local transit conditions over the long term by incorporating transit amenities within local roadway improvements, preserving existing rail rights-of-way for future rail or trail use, and dedicating additional rail rights-of-way to form connections to the regional transit system. Goal C/RC-4. A balanced and integrated multimodal transportation system that increases mass transit opportunities for Huntington Beach residents. Policies A. Continue to reserve abandoned rail rights-of-way for future transportation uses such as transit and bicycle facilities. B. Increase bus lines and services along commute routes and connecting to regional transit such as ARTIC, in partnership with OCTA and LA Metro. C. Use roadway improvement projects as an opportunity to enhance transit amenities and options. D. Maintain a system of transit and paratransit services that assist seniors and persons with disabilities. E. Provide alternative transportation options for residents and visitors to travel to Downtown. F. Increase ridership by providing attractive, comfortable, and convenient options for local transit. G. Ensure that construction and operation of heliports and helistops and construction or alteration of structures more than 200 feet above ground level fully comply with provisions of federal and state law, and with referral requirements of the Airport Land Use Commission. 3-32 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) ♦..ems Ensuring Mobility Options for All Users Traditional circulation planning tends to focus on travel by cars,many times at the expense of other modes of transportation, such as walking, biking,train, and transit.The Circulation Plan is intended to accommodate and encourage these other modes of travel. In addition to carrying traffic between destinations, streets are integral to neighborhoods and provide places for people to gather and recreate. The City's objective is to balance the many competing roles that streets play in the lives of residents, businesses,and visitors. Goal CIRC-5. The City's active transportation system integrates seamlessly with transit and vehicle circulation as part of a Complete Streets system. Policies A. Maximize use of transportation demand management strategies to reduce total vehicle miles traveled and improve regional air quality. B. Develop Complete Streets that create functional places meeting the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, wheelchair users, and motorists. Provide safe, accessible, and connected multimodal routes, especially along popular and arterial routes. C. Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions to ensure that bicycle routes connect to and are consistent with routes in adjacent jurisdictions. D. Maintain and repair bicycle lanes and sidewalks as necessary to expand use and safety. E. Improve citywide awareness of pedestrian and bicycle safety. F. Include low-impact stormwater system design techniques in Complete Streets designs(i.e., natural stormwater retention basins, curb cuts to planter areas for stormwater management). G. Support alternative fuel vehicles where feasible. Enhancing Bicycle, Pedestrian, Equestrian, and Waterway Options The existing development pattern in Huntington Beach limits the ability in some areas of the city to commute via bicycle or by walking, and could result in limiting access to goods, services, schools, and parks and recreation resources. It is generally considered challenging and unpleasant to cross or travel along major roadways as a bicyclist or pedestrian. Enhancements to the roadway system through Complete Streets serve the needs of all users equally and can increase the viability of bicycling and walking for both commute and local servicetrips. At the same time, some portions of Huntington Beach (e.g., Downtown/Main Street) are dominated by pedestrians during the peak tourist season and would benefit from improvements that balance the needs of other users. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) J 3-33 Equestrians and boaters are also important circulation system users requiring access to facilities. Goal C/RC-6.Connected,well-maintained, and well-designed sidewalks, bike lanes, equestrian paths, and waterways allow for both leisurely use and day-to-day required activities in a safe and efficient manner for all ages and abilities. Policies A. Provide pedestrian and bicycle routes that integrate with local and regional transit, connect destinations, and provide end-of-trip facilities. B. Designate and improve pedestrian enhancement zones (PEZs)at appropriate locations. C. Require new commercial and residential projects to integrate with pedestrian and bicycle networks, and that necessary land area is provided for the infrastructure. D. Implement and operate appropriate traffic control devices to reduce conflicts between pedestrians, bicycles,and motor vehicles. E. Ensure that bicycle and pedestrian facilities comply with accessibility provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. F. Increase bicycle parking in or near Downtown, near the beach, and throughout the planning area. Identify opportunities for a pilot bikesharing program in Downtown. G. Encourage the use of easements and/or rights-of-way along flood control channels, public utilities, railroads, and streets, for use by bicyclists and/or pedestrians, where safe and appropriate. H. Maintain an equestrian trail network that supports horse properties and local stables, and link trails to regional facilities that can be combined with hiking trails. I. Maintain navigable waterways in Huntington Harbour and Sunset Channel for both recreational and commuter use. Protecting Scenic Corridors Scenic corridors enhance the visibility and attractiveness of the community, and in some cases, provide visual access to the beach and ocean. Protecting the aesthetic appeal of these areas is an ongoing City priority. 3-34 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Goal CIRC-7. Designated scenic corridors protect and enhance visual quali(y and scenic views. Policies A. Establish and implement landscape and urban streetscape design themes for landscape corridors, minor urban scenic corridors, and major urban scenic corridors that create a distinct character for each, enhancing each corridor's surrounding land uses. B. Require that any bridges, culverts, drainage ditches, retaining walls, and other ancillary scenic and landscape corridor elements be compatible and architecturally consistent with surrounding development and established design guidelines, to the greatest extent practicable. C. Require that slopes and earthen berms along scenic corridors be landscaped consistent with design objectives and standards. D. Provide landscaped medians and sidewalk treatments in accordance with City standards within major and primary arterial streets designated as landscape corridors, and continue to require the construction of landscaped medians and sidewalk treatments in new developments. E. Require that development projects adjacent to a designated scenic corridor include open spaces, plazas, gardens, and/or landscaping that enhance the corridor and create a buffer between the building site and the roadway. F. Continue to locate new and relocated utilities underground within scenic corridors to the greatest extent possible. All other utility features shall be placed and screened to minimize visibility. Providing for Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Infrastructure Increasing the use of alternative fuels(e.g., natural gas, hydrogen, fuel cells)in traditional vehicles and increasing the use of electric vehicles represent important strategies to maintain mobility while reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Goal CIRC-8. Planning and infrastructure support electric and alternative fuel vehicles through power or fueling stations and other means. Policies A. Encourage inclusion of power stations and alternative fuels at traditional gas stations. B. Plan for conversion of all government fleet vehicles to alternative fuel or electricity. r t Fe City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-35 Ensuring Access for Emergency Vehicles Ensuring the ability of the City's emergency services to respond to emergency situations is crucial to the community's public safety.Congestion may impede the ability of the City's emergency services to respond in a timely manner. It is important to implement new devices and programs to improve the ability of emergency personnel and vehicles to respond to calls for assistance and direct residents during emergencies. Goal CIRC-9. The circulation system is prepared for emergency vehicle response by reducing congestion or other roadway- and traffic-related impediments which can slow response times. Policies A. Provide a circulation system that helps to meet emergency response time goals and incorporates technology infrastructure to clear intersections during emergency response events. B. Complete transportation improvements that assist in meeting the response goals for emergency services. C. Provide a system of primary, major, and secondary arterials that can be used for evacuating persons during emergencies or for ingress when emergency response units are needed. k,. 3-36 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Iv. Environmental Resources and conservation 0 introdud kF Boa and Purpose Huntington Beach benefits tremendously from surrounding natural resources, which include City parks, wetlands, mineral resources, biological diversity, clean air and water, and the community's world-famous beach and shoreline. These resources contribute substantially to the local economy, provide rest and recreational opportunities, and help support public health. In order to continue to benefit from these resources, Huntington Beach must protect and enhance them when possible while still allowing for economic growth. Scope and Content The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element establishes goals and policies to protect and conserve Huntington Beach's environmental resources, including open space and beaches, and addresses air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water quality, biological diversity,and mineral resources. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-1 California Government Code Sections 65302(d), 65302(e), and 65560 direct local governments to include a conservation element and an open space element in their re_ general plans. The conservation element must provide for the conservation,development, and utilization of natural resources, including water and its hydraulic force, forests, soils, rivers and other waters, harbors, fisheries, wildlife, minerals, and other natural resources to the extent that they are present in the planning area. The open space element protects open space intended for the preservation of natural resources, managed resource production, outdoor recreation, and public health and safety. This Environmental Resources and Conservation Element meets state requirements for both a conservation element and an open space element. It addresses all required content for each element, in addition to locally important issues. The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element consists of this Introduction and Purpose identifying the intent of the element and how it relates to other documents;an Open Space Plan identifying local open spaces,including the beach and other coastal areas,and the issues facing open spaces in the community;a Conservation Plan discussing the quality of natural resources in Huntington Beach and how they are used; and Issues, Goals, and Policies,for both open space and conservation,providing tools to protect and improve the environmental resources present in Huntington Beach. The proposed tools to put policies that address environmental resources and conservation issues into practice are included in the Implementation Programs chapter of this General Plan. Relationship to Other Elements The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element most closely relates to the Land Use,Circulation, Housing, Natural and Environmental Hazards,and Historic and Cultural Resources Elements. The Land Use Element identifies desired future uses for all lands in the planning area. Such uses relevant to the Environmental Resources and Conservation Element include parks, recreational facilities, and public and privately owned open spaces to meet the needs of existing and future generations. Circulation Element goals and policies identify, and ensure access to, open spaces and recreational areas requiring access. The Circulation Element also assigns the location of streets and trail systems for pedestrians, bicyclists,and equestrians in open spaces. The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element provides goals and policies addressing public health and safety,including open space lands such as parks,trails, lakes, and the beach. The Historic and Cultural Resources Element is a companion element to the Environmental Resources and Conservation Element, and provides policies and programs related to conservation of historic and cultural resources within the planning area. 4-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Open Space Plan Open Space land use designations , comprise approximately 3,274 acres (17 percent) of the planning area, exclusive of open space """ located within specific plan areas. Open space in Huntington Beach ranges from small mini parks to the Bolsa Chica Wetlands. Residents and visitors use these sites for active and passive recreation, including organized sports, running, walking, picnics, and as children's play areas. They often serve as buffers between different land uses, and can provide habitat for a number of species. Open spaces provide numerous benefits to the community and contribute substantially to a high quality of life. Open Space Diagram Open space in the planning area consists of habitat conservation areas, parks,shoreline, and recreation areas. Figure ERC-1 designates each existing open space use in the planning area. Table ERC-1 identifies the acreage of each open space use type and identifies how each is categorized under state open space law. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-3 MA � F City of city Of seat Fr Itrtt� k c Boisa Ave m AAcFadd$n: Ave 2 r m EdnryerAve Ptuw Rgton �ifarUour . � l�[ailAva city Of m ft rAve 2 SlaterAve a _' Salb ,� in, 'Talbert Ave d Elrs 5, Ave Q m r rk Ciadidd Ave ILAve ' Adams Ave g�a tndiamapotlsAve Atlanta Ave y Harr87ton Ave LEGEND Maju CRY at-A. ••eery UMIS 0� ■anningAve Plaming Ar" paw¢ .. 4rrinanflla�AlaB W' 'S$4- Open Space - �` -Parr 011 Shore _f 3 Water Oa4a.3—Oaks-010d by PMC§ffi443 Baae MaP S..b:City of H-Mgkan Bcaefi E:4441 71 II flr� z € � Open Space Diagram 's r a1 4-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Table C-I Open Space Land Uses 0 E Conservation Preservation of Natural Resources 1,662 511. (OS-C) Parks (OS-P) i Outdoor Recreation/Public Health and 701 21% Safety Recreation Outdoor Recreation/Public Health and (OS-R) Safety/Preservation of Natural 238 7% Resources Water Recreation Outdoor Recreation/Public Health and (OS-WR) Safety/Preservation of Natural 239 7% Resources Shore(OS-S) Outdoor Recreation/Public Health and 434 13% Safety Total 3,274 100%* Note:Open space categories correspond to those identified in CalifomiaGovernment Code Section 65560(b). Totals may not add up due to rounding Conservation (OS-C) areas constitute the largest open space use category at 1,662 acres. Much of this area is located in the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, which is considered part of the planning area, but is not currently incorporated as part of the city.The other major concentration of conservation land is located in the Huntington Beach wetlands near the southeast edge of the city. The Conservation designation provides for environmental resource conservation and management (e.g., wetland protection) and supporting ancillary uses (e.g., maintenance equipment storage). Habitat conservation lands are exposed to environmental degradation due to upstream water quality issues, ecological connectivity problems, and increasing tidal variability. This element includes goals, policies,and programs to protect these resources such as restoring and enhancing habitat resources,enhancing habitat connectivity,and naturalizing flood channels. t3 -5 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4 Parks (OS-P) make up the second largest land area among open space �m uses, accounting for 701 acres.The Parks designation provides for public parks and recreational facilities and supporting ancillary uses (e.g., maintenance equipment storage) and consists of uses ranging from mini parks to larger regional parks. Central Park accounts for about half of the parkland. The Parks and Recreation discussion below addresses challenges, opportunities, and the City's desired future for parks. Recreation(OS-R)areas are the third largest Open Space land use designation, covering 238 acres. The Recreation designation provides for publicly or privately operated recreation facilities, such as golf courses. This designation also provides for supporting ancillary uses(e.g., food stands, recreational equipment rentals, maintenance equipment storage). Recreation uses in the planning area face numerous challenges including competing user needs, surrounding land use compatibility issues, and environmental quality challenges. Goals, policies, and programs in this element seek to mitigate these challenges by providing for diverse recreation facilities and evaluating potential incompatibilities. Water Recreation (OS-W) accounts for 239 acres of the planning area. The Water Recreation designation provides for water bodies used for recreational purposes,such as boating, fishing, swimming, and water sports. Currently the OS-W designation is used in the Huntington Harbour waterways. Shore (OS-S) accounts for 434 acres of the planning area. The Shore designation provides for coastal beaches operated by the City and the State, and publicly or privately operated ancillary uses (e.g., food stands, recreational equipment rentals, maintenance equipment storage). Lands located in the Shore designation face many challenges including conflicting user needs, and erosion and physical impacts associated with coastal storms and increasing tidal variability. The City seeks to protect and enhance these economic and ecologically important land resources through goals, policies,and programs that maintain the recreational and cultural identity of the beach while improving and enhancing the overall habitat value of coastal areas. 4 6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Parks and Recreation The City of Huntington Beach maintains and operates public park grounds and landscaped areas. In total, 79 parks consisting of 1,073 acres are located in Huntington Beach,ranging in size from mini parks (smaller than 2.5 acres)up to Central Park, a 343-acre regional park(Figure ERC-2),and including City-operated beaches and a public golf course.Along with park facilities, recreation programming is an important part of creating and maintaining a healthy community with a high quality of life. Huntington Beach residents enjoy many recreation opportunities, provided by a City government committed to ensuring a well-rounded, healthy community. Recreation programming includes volunteering opportunities, human services programs,classes,sports,cultural arts,school programs, nature programs, and special events for residents from every walk of life. The City is committed to ensuring that residents of all ages, backgrounds, and interests have abundant available recreation opportunities. Parks Inventory and Acreage Standards Huntington Beach contains a number of different types of parks. Figure ERC-3 includes a list and the location of the city's 79 parks as well as the City Gym and Pool. Mini parks are generally smaller than 2.5 acres and typically do not have enough room for organized recreation facilities, but support passive recreational activities such as ». walking (e.g., Booster Park, French Park, Tarbox Park). Neighborhood parks are between 2.5 and 10 acres in size and often provide recreational opportunities to families with young children. They typically " have children's play areas and structures,and many are located near a school (e.g., Burke Park, Conrad U. Park, Drew Park,Wieder Park). Community parks are 10 to 40 acres in size and are often centrally located to serve multiple neighborhoods. These facilities provide a wide range of recreational opportunities for children and adults, and offer a more diverse range of activities than neighborhood parks (e.g., Chris Carr Park, Gisler Park, Langenbeck Park, Marina Park). Regional parks, which exceed 40 acres in size, provide specialized recreational facilities `ak such as equestrian areas and campsites. In addition to serving Huntington Beach community members, regional parks often attract visitors from a wider region (e.g., } Huntington Central Park). City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-7 Most cities establish parkland acreage standards, which ensure that the community has enough parks to serve the population. In Huntington Beach, based on the existing population of 193,189 in 2014, there are approximately 5.4 acres of parkland for every q� 1,000 Huntington Beach residents including parks, City-operated beaches, a public golf course,and the City Gym and Pool. Site Selection Standards for New Parks The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element maintains an established citywide parkland level of service goal of 5 or more acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. This General Plan has an anticipated year2040 buildout population of 211,051 residents. Under this population scenario, assuming no net loss of parkland acreage, the City would have a parkland level of service of 5.1 acres per 1,000 residents, which would degrade the existing level of service, but still meets the established standard without the addition of new parkland. Because Huntington Beach is largely a built-out city, locating new parks will be difficult. The City will prioritize developing new park facilities in underserved areas in a way that equitably serves neighborhood and community needs while balancing budget constraints. The City will continue to locate future neighborhood parks adjacent to elementary schools with independent street frontage when possible. Additionally, the City will seek to retain existing open spaces in the event that schools close or are decommissioned. A park that is inaccessible, lacks usable open space, or is otherwise constrained has limited utility to the residents it is designed to serve.Therefore, the City will also prioritize accessibility as a factor in the selection of future park sites, with an emphasis on pedestrian and bicycle accessibility. Recreation Facilities and Services Huntington Beach is home to a wide range of public recreation facilities and services including indoor activities, baseball/softball diamonds, tennis courts, swimming pools, handball courts, volleyball courts, horseshoe pits, basketball courts, disk golf courses,a skate park, lakes in parks, and other sports fields. These facilities are faced with the challenge of constantly changing public demands, and many facilities are not readily adaptable to changing community preferences and needs. The City addresses this challenge through policies and programs that seek to diversify recreation facilities and services. 4-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1 11th Street Beach 21 Discovery Well 41 Huntington Central 61 Perry 2 Arevalos 22 Orew 42 Irby 62 Pleasant View 3 Baca 23 Eader 43 take 63 Prince 4 Wiley 24 Edison 44 Lake View 64 Robinwood 5 8aanin Ma nolia 2S Farquhar 45 lamb 65 Rogers Senior tenter 6 Bartlett 26 Finley46 Lambert 66 Schroeder 7 Bauer 27 Franklin 47 tan enbeck 67 Seabdd e 8 Bluff Top 28 French 48 Lark VI ew 68 Seeley 9 Boardwalk 29 Gibbs 49 LeBard 69 Sowers 10 Bolsavlew 30 Gisler 50 manning 70 Sun View 11 Booster 31 Glen View 51 Marina 71 :Sunset Beach Greenbelt 12 Burke 32 Golden View 52 Marine View 72 '.Talbert 13 Bushard 33 Green 53 McCatlen 73 Tarbox 14 Carr, 34 Greer 54 Moffett 74 .Tar 15 Circle View 35 Harbour View 1 55 MuW 75 Triangle 16 City Gym 36 Haven View 56 Newland 76 Trinidad 17 Clegg—Stacey 37 Hawes 57 Oak View 77 Wardlow 18 College View 38 Helme 58 Pacific City 78 Wieder 19 Conrad 39 Hope View 59 Parkside 79 Wieder Regional O.C.k 20 Davenport Beach 40 Humboldt Beach 60 Pattinson 80 Worth @ n w V CSby of day of Yt"britnster '3e41 Beach Boise AVai. McFadden. a Y Ave i3 m m 5 W 'EdIngerAve HeRAve Sunset Be rd'„ .• „n `'E E V4tw uri of'. 9 3r w s E I Err �� ',$etu�fai4€Y��rfPau;# 71 YJe rAve 'geterAve � ThlbertAve `. uxaona a n c i a�F a Ave d v t in Garfield Ave Orange Car iVi4e £`jf 5� $ ToiAtownAve d Adams Ave I, Lndianapotia Ave 3 3 C,. myt, A ��ABardaAue LEGEND'' —Major City Streets �$ 5 �tiamiltoma ---City Limits Av a Park 44, Park Service Area o q l faAYg Mini Park Buffer Neighborhood Park Buffer -._ 2 �5 Community Park Butner ? Cmstrtmes. Gti C5 4waf Wlcdm',#d'aiM cfNr}- $, Q7 wr Yag CYyalxWxlyp Nu:nimfx- +7".,�' 8tsitaklaa Park Locations and Service Areas Figure ERC- City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-9 Coastal Recreation and Beach Management The entire Huntington Beach coastline supports a contiguous sandy beach totaling 9.5 miles and 434 acres.This includes both state and City beach areas, the pier, the multi-use trail running the length of the beach, recreational amenities, parking, and a range of private retail, food, and personal service activities associated with the beach. The beaches, from north to south, are Sunset Beach, Bolsa Chica State Beach, Huntington Beach City Beach, and Huntington State Beach. The beach is used for a variety of recreational activities, from swimming, surfing, fishing, and sunbathing to jogging and volleyball, to major sporting and cultural events. Beach access and recreational activities are important to the city's economic vitality and cultural identity. The beaches and adjacent marine habitats also provide habitat for numerous species, including federally protected birds that use the beach for nesting. It is important that beach management practices maintain a careful balance between recreational uses and providing functional habitat for native species. Beaches in the planning area face numerous challenges ranging from conflicting user needs, ecological sensitivity, erosion, and increasing tidal variability. The policies in this Environmental Resources and Conservation Element work to ensure the beach maintains and improves its recreational, economic, and ecological value. State Beaches Bolsa Chica State Beach extends approximately 3 miles from Seapoint Street to Warner Avenue. This beach is a popular destination for surfing, fishing, and other recreation. The beach is also a popular grunion run during the summer months. Shorebirds forage in the intertidal zone. Special-status western snowy plover may forage along the beach as well. Huntington State Beach extends approximately 2 miles from the mouth of the Santa Ana River north to Beach Boulevard. The beach features a multi-use trail and fire rings for bonfires. Huntington State Beach includes the Least Tern Natural Preserve, which also x provides sanctuary for other birds, including the western snowy plover. 4-10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) City Beaches The City operates two public beaches,consisting of 3.5 miles of shoreline, extending from Beach Boulevard to Seapoint Street. 2.5 miles of this area is owned by the State of California and operated by the City. Sunset Beach consists of a 1.1-mile stretch of shoreline extending from Warner Avenue to Anderson Street. Both beaches are popular destinations for recreation such as volleyball, fishing, surfing,and swimming.The beaches receive millions of visitors each year and require routine maintenance. Shorebirds forage in the intertidal zone. Special-status western snowy plover may forage along the beaches as well. ¢ � MP j3 3 3 ,, a conservation Plan X � Natural resources in Huntington Beach are critical for the safety and well-being of the community. Clean air and a reliable water supply help ensure the health of Huntington Beach residents,while the community's mineral resources and biological diversity support the local economy by attracting jobs and visitors.Although often overlooked, modern life in Huntington Beach would be very difficult without abundant local and regional energy resources.This section discusses where these key resources are located in the planning area and outlines a conservation strategy for each resource. Please refer to the Historic and Cultural Resources Element for discussion of cultural resources, and the Public � a City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-11 Services and Infrastructure Element for discussion concerning solid waste—related resources. Air Resources Huntington Beach is located within the South Coast Air Basin. Of the various pollutants monitored for human health, the key pollutants of concern in the air basin are ozone,small particulate matter (PM,,and PMZ.5), and nitrogen dioxide (NO,),which are collectively part of a group called criteria air pollutants. Other criteria air pollutants include carbon monoxide (CO),sulfur dioxide (SO,), and lead (Pb). These air pollutants can come from a number of sources, including major facilities (manufacturing centers, power plants, and large commercial and institutional buildings), construction and landscaping activities, and moving vehicles. While ozone plays an important role high in the atmosphere to protect the earth from excess ultraviolet light, it creates health risks near the surface. Exposure to excessive levels of ozone can lead to breathing problems, headaches, and nausea. It is also the primary component in smog, in which ozone mixes with other pollutants, and can create additional health hazards.Ozone is created when fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum and natural gas) are burned, and when various chemicals evaporate creating certain chemical compounds. These compounds react in the presence of sunlight to create ozone. Low wind speeds or stagnant air, warm temperatures, and clear skies help prevent ozone from dissipating, keeping ozone levels elevated. The South Coast Air Basin is not currently in compliance with state and federal air quality standards for ozone, but localized ozone levels in and around Huntington Beach do comply with these standards. Particulate matter consists of dust, soot, and smoke. Larger particles are known as PM,o, while smaller particles are known as PM2.5. They are formed from the burning of fossil fuels, wood burning, and construction activities. Particulate matter can cause breathing problems when inhaled, and can make existing respiratory and cardiovascular conditions more severe. PM2.1 is particularly dangerous, as it can settle deep in the lungs and create long-term health impacts.The air basin exceeds federal and state standards for both PM," and PM2.1. Huntington Beach and surrounding areas currently exceed state (but not federal) standards for PM,o, and are below federal annual standards for PM2.5(although the community exceeds federal daily standards). Nitrogen dioxide is a brown-colored gas formed by the burning of fossil fuels. When inhaled, it can cause breathing difficulties, chest pains, and a rapid heartbeat. In severe cases,exposure to NO2 can lead to bronchitis and reduced lung capacity.The air basin is currently below state and federal standards for NO2. In addition to criteria air pollutants, a second category, toxic air contaminants (TACs), consists of air pollutants that can create a risk of illness or death, even in relatively low concentrations. Particulate matter from diesel engines (diesel PM) is the TAC that poses 4-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) the greatest health risk in California. Diesel PM is generated by diesel engines, including diesel passenger and freight vehicles, rail engines, and diesel generators and other equipment. The state has also identified close to 200 other TACs. Environmental Justice Considerations Environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) has an environmental justice program to ensure that everyone has the right to equal protection from air pollution and fair access to the decision-making process that works to improve the quality of air in their communities. cA Both criteria air pollutants and "'—' .., °°" " " ' � .- � � r,�art�,�azansgessmenrdz�� v. TACs can have greater health E L- impacts on children, the elderly, and people with existing ',.. r•y m respiratory or cardiovascular m conditions. Places with a larger number of these vulnerable people -- EdingerAve are called sensitive land uses (or sensitive receptors). For purposes HeffAve of the General Plan, sensitive land uses include schools, hospitals, Nlib Ante nursing homes and senior care centers, and residential areas. ••, to" 'g"" Recreational land uses, such as �•Salb er(I Talbeit*e. parks, can also be sensitive land uses, as exercise places a higher '�•'• l fr' dsa Chico r 1 Ue demand on peoples respiratory systems,which can be stressed by M air pollution. — - Air quality in the South Coast Air •' �e Basin has significantly improved since the 1990s, and it is likely that �� Uis ' �3sa chica rf Ave g '2 _ this trend will continue. However, Wetlands m this trend may be challenged by r�,' increases in population, and air r-- quality may become worse in future ears as a result of climate ••`: `g Y City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) „.` 4-13 change. Poor air quality tends to be more prevalent in areas with higher numbers of lower- income individuals and minorities, which can create a lack of public health equity across the community. Some sensitive land uses,such as schools and residential areas located near heavy industrial uses, may expose individuals to higher levels of TACs.The State of California has prepared a database called CalEnviroScreen, which helps identify communities with environmental justice considerations at the census block level by looking at pollution levels, health data, and demographics. Huntington Beach has one census block(tract 994.02), bordered by Warner Avenue, Beach Boulevard, Talbert Avenue, and Goldenwest Street, which ranks in the top 25 percent for environmental justice considerations of all census blocks in the state. To maintain high standards of health and aesthetics in the community and to improve public health equity for all community members, the City will work to improve air quality conditions for all criteria air pollutants and minimize exposure of sensitive uses to TACs. This includes identifying opportunities to locate new air pollutant sources away from sensitive uses and disproportionately affected communities, and to work with existing air pollutant sources to help reduce air pollutant emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions GHGs trap heat radiated out by the earth and reflect it back to the surface rather than allowing it to escape into space,similar to the glass roof and walls of a greenhouse. Some level of GHGs in the atmosphere is necessary to keep the planet at a comfortable temperature. However, since the Industrial Revolution, the concentration of these gases has increased significantly in the atmosphere. These higher concentrations of GHGs are increasing temperatures worldwide and resulting in global climate change.The direct risks posed by climate change include more extreme heat events, rising sea levels, changes in precipitation levels, and more intense storms. California law (the Global Warming Solutions Act) declares that climate change is a serious risk, specifically saying that it threatens to cause"the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state...a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residents, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases,asthma, and other human-related health problems." In order to address this risk,the law requires the state to significantly reduce its emissions of the GHGs,which contribute to climate change. The state has identified seven key GHGs,the most common of which is carbon dioxide (CO,).Other GHGs include methane.(CH<)and nitrous oxide(NO,not to be confused with NO2, a criteria air pollutant). Unlike criteria air pollutants and TACs,which do not stay in the atmosphere long, some GHGs can persist in the atmosphere for hundreds or thousands of years.Although CO2 is the most common GHG,other rarer gases can trap thousands of times as much heat as an identical amount of CO2. GHGs are measured in =ry' a unit called carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e),which accounts for their varying potency. 4-14 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) IM Sources of GHG emissions in Huntington Beach include cars and trucks, electricity and natural gas use in buildings, decomposition of solid waste,landscaping and construction equipment, oil drilling, and water and wastewater distribution, treatment, and use. GHG emissions in 2005 in Huntington Beach totaled 1,452,070 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCOZe). On-road vehicle use represented the largest source of GHGs, followed by energy use in residential and nonresidential buildings. Collectively, these sources comprised 91 percent of Huntington Beach's 2005 GHG emissions,with all other sources comprising the remaining 9 percent. In 2012 Huntington Beach's GHG emissions fell to 1,432,540 MTCO2e, a decline of approximately 1 percent. Emissions from on-road vehicle use were largely unchanged, while emissions from energy use in residential and nonresidential buildings increased slightly.These three sources comprised 95 percent of Huntington Beach's GHG emissions in 2012. Table ERC-2 summarizes Huntington Beach's GHG emissions in 2005 and 2012 by sector. Table ERC-2 Huntington Beach 2005 and 2012 GHG Emissions t Residential built 313,310 q327.,340 4% environment Nonresidential built 286,260 301,840 5% environment Transportation 723,440 726,190 <1% Off-road equipment 35,240 11,580 -67% Solid waste 67,210 38,620 -43% Water and wastewater 10,000 10,410 4% Oil drilling 16,610 16,560 <-1% Total 1,452,070 1,432,540 -1% Huntington Beach's GHG emissions will continue to change going forward due to new policies, technological improvements, and population growth and new development. For example, as more houses.are built in Huntington Beach, emissions from the residential built environment may increase. However, as energy becomes cleaner and as new construction becomes more energy efficient, these improvements may offset some of the increased GHG emissions from a growing population. An estimate of Huntington Beach's 2020 and 2040 GHG emissions, without any additional actions to reduce emissions, is shown below in Table ERC-3. ' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-15 Table ERC-3 Huntington Beach 2020 and 2040 GHG Emissions E Residential built 332,010 355,380 j 9% environment Nonresidential built 321,680 355,170 18% environment E Transportation 755,700 840,750 E 16% Off-road equipment 22,040 37,510 i 224% Solid waste 40,120 43,540 13% Water and wastewater 10,800 11,730 i 13% Oil drilling 16,560 16,560 0% Total 1,498,910 1,660,640 16% Transportation activities are expected to remain the source of approximately half of Huntington Beach's GHG emissions in future years,with the residential and nonresidential built environment sectors continuing to account for much of the community's remaining GHG emissions.As the population and economic activity of Huntington Beach increases, GHG emissions are expected to increase unless actions are taken to reduce emissions. Without any GHG reduction activities, Huntington Beach's GHG emissions are expected to rise to 16 percent above 2012 levels by 2040. The most significant increase, in the off- road equipment sector, is expected to result from substantially increased construction activity relative to the 2012 baseline. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program This element contains goals and policies that direct the City's approach to reducing GHGs below the levels shown in Table ERC-3, including emissions reduction targets and general emissions reduction strategies. An accompanying Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program provides specific GHG emissions reduction measures applicable to various sectors of the community and the City's municipal operations. The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program as a whole is considered an implementation measure for the policies described in this element. The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program will meet the six specific requirements for these programs that are spelled out in the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, allowing the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program to be used to streamline environmental review of new development. These six requirements are as follows: 4-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) • Quantify greenhouse gas emissions, both existing and projected over a specified time period, resulting from activities within a defined geographic area. • Establish a level, based on substantial evidence, below which the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from activities covered by the plan would not be cumulatively considerable. • Identify and analyze the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from specific actions or categories of actions anticipated within the geographic area. • Specify measures or a group of measures, including performance standards, that substantial evidence demonstrates, if implemented on a project-by-project basis, would collectively achieve the specified emissions level. • Establish a mechanism to monitor the plan's progress toward achieving the level and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving specified levels. • Be adopted in a public process following environmental review. Biological Resources Huntington Beach is located within the Southern California Coast ecological section of California. The city is characterized by broad, sandy beaches backed by low bluffs and mesas, and lowland areas that historically supported extensive wetlands. Despite being part of a dense urban landscape, the beaches, lowlands, bluffs, and mesas of Huntington Beach today support a variety of natural communities that provide habitat for numerous plant and wildlife species. Table ERC-4 summarizes the types and acreages of natural and urbanized communities present in the planning area. Figure ERC-3 identifies the location of these communities. Natural communities occurring in undeveloped areas include coastal salt and freshwater marshes,dune communities, riparian scrub,grassland,and coastal sage scrub.In addition to terrestrial communities, aquatic features such as the Santa Ana River, flood control channels, and marine waters and associated beaches provide important habitat for local and migratory species.Although several natural communities occur in the planning area, urbanized communities make up the majority of the area. Urbanized communities include nonnative/ornamental plants, ruderal/disturbed areas, eucalyptus groves, and a limited amount of agriculture consisting mostly of nurseries located under power lines and adjacent to the Santa Ana River. Although subject to high levels of human disturbance, these areas still provide habitat for numerous species. "9 a City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-17 j L) m Coy 9 City at E Westtninster seat ftaen, @ o G $olsaAv@ McFadden Ave I — E&4WAvs ylnxsmpean�:: � ■ f-MAye _ City,f Foerarr=n xx�y Ave impTatert Ave 4,. EMS s Ave o 72 to e4., raeldnve —J YniktownAYe a � �E AammsAve r e a aF✓ ^tF wry y e9� , -{ sa lndanapolisAve.. W IIIIII / - i 0� ,A#antaA" C `gam i �y� wave tp Cr#Sr aS Carta Mass LEGEND ©Planning Ansa Non-Sensitive '''''. Sandy Beach --Non-Incorporated land A.gneulture(Nurseries and Gardens) Southern Willow Riparian Scrub Y'AftnPlanningArea Coastal Sage Scrub ......Urban Natural Communities Eucalyptus Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh Sensitive „:.Nan-Native Grassland Flood Control Channel Southern Cosslal Salt Marsh Non-NasveM narnental Marine Water Southern Foredurres ... Rudetaltpasturbed Open Water Sawetern tune Sonrb v r e Natural and Urbanized Communities Figure ERC- f?its- 4-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Table ERC-4 Natural and Urbanized Communities Occurring Within the Huntington Beach Planning Area Southern Coastal Salt Marsh* 1,068 Southern Dune Scrub* 4 Marine Water 546 Sandy Beach 291 Southern Willow Riparian Scrub 32 Nonnative Grassland 225 Coastal Sage Scrub 77 Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh 18 Urban 15,477 Nonnative/Ornamental 614 Eucalyptus 61 Agricultural(Nurseries and Gardens) 58 Flood Control Channels 263 Santa Ana River N/A Total Planning Area 18,971 *Identifiedasa sensitive natural communitybythe California Department of Fish and Wildife. Several of these natural communities are considered sensitive by resource agencies such as the California Department Of Fish and Wildlife, U8 Fish and Wildlife 8en/ice, and National Marine Fisheries Service. In addition, several Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (EGHAS) designated by the California Coastal Commission are located in the planning area. Sensitive communities include southern coastal salt marsh, dune habitats, freshwater marsh, and riparian opamo. In addition, ae|gnamn beds occur in the coastal vvmt|ands, bays and flood control channels and are considered a sensitive marine resource. Several state- and federally listed species are known to occur in Huntington Beach. including western snowy plover,California least tern, Belding's savannah sparrow,coastal California gnatoetcher. light-footed clapper nai|, and tricolored blackbird. Other special- status species known to utilize habitats in and adjacent to the city include southern barp|ant, monarch butterfly, white-tailed kite, silvery legless lizard, burrowing owl, northern horrier, peregrine falcon, loggerhead shrike, California brown pelican, black skimmer,and special-status bats. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2. 2017) 4-19 Habitat Areas Though most of Huntington Beach is urbanized,several open space areas remain that are capable of supporting habitat for special-status species. These areas are managed by a variety of agencies and organizations that have different levels of jurisdiction and authority over the resources present. Several established habitat areas also support other uses requiring routine maintenance (e.g., beaches, parks). Table ERC-5 and Figure ERC4 identify these areas and the organization(s)responsible for managing them. Table ERC-5 Habitat Areas N III III Within City Limits Bolsa Chica State Beach ( 130 California Department of Parks and Recreation Brightwater Conservation Area 34 Brightwater Homeowners Association (includes 5-acre eucalyptus ESHA) Brightwater Environmental Protection Area 2 Brightwater Homeowners Association'" Flood Control Channels 368 Orange County Flood Huntington Beach Wetlands 172* Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy Huntington City Beach (City Beach and Sunset Beach) i 122 City of Huntington Beach Huntington Harbour and associated 253 City of Huntington Beach and Orange shorelines County Huntington State Beach 144 California Department of Parks and (includes Least Tern Natural Preserve) Recreation Waterfront Wetland 3 City of Huntington Beach City parks and open spaces (includes open space areas, and parts of Central, 256 City of Huntington Beach Bartlett,and Norma Gibbs Parks) ! Seagate-created Wetland Area 5 Seagate Homeowners Association Shea Parkside Property ESHA 3 Future Homeowners Association Shea Parkside Property Wetlands/Buffer 16 Future Homeowners Association Outside City Limits Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve(includes eucalyptus grove and Warner Pond 1,334 California Department of Fish and Wildlife ESHAs) Bolsa Chica Basin State Marine 450 California Fish and Game Commission Conservation Area ......-...-... � .�__..._._-... ---—-- — ---- ..__...-- ....-- ----- ._�..._._._.. --.�—_-._-_ Bolsa Bay State Marine Conservation 45 California Fish and Game Commission Area Goodell Property 1 Property owner Unincorporated Open Space Areas 57 Various agencies and organizations Huntington Beach Wetlands acreage includesNewtand Marsh,which was owned byCaltransat the time this plan was prepared. ._ —Presently the developer manages the Brightwater Conservation Area and Environmental Protection Area;the Brightwater HOA will ultimately take over this responsibility. Note:Acreages cannot be totaled,as several established habitat areas overlap. 4-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) V (1v 1 V} City Of � F "" Coy O Wtrrairrter' Seal 'each Huntington' ' 12 Harbour m' r �lAv +.W°f Warner Pond ESHA Brightwater Conservation Area � � Norma G vironmental Protection.Area B htwater En . � ibbs Park, iaA city ot ., Fountain"Halle Sunset rAxe Beach Shea Property ESHA 4�r m, Bolsa Bay -�Shea..Wetland , SMCA SWWAus ti Goodell Property �N '. Sait,grp Eucalyptus G Huntington Beach Grove ESHA 4 g '� �_ Central Park Z5 � _ MS. Aver s Bolsa Chica � State Beach m - Seagate Created Wetland Area taarltdAx� .. Bolsa Chica Basin SMCA Open Space a (City) _ Yurkc n,�V6 `�tre v x Bolsa Chica Ecological ro .......... Adams Ave Reserve Bartlett Park Open Space 4� (Unincorporated) a �4. ric3iarmr4xrlfsAut Waterfront i' Huntington City Beach Wetland Huntington Beach Wetlands Cti �+�• nni"[j 48 ; LEGEND City of 0 � Costa Mesa Planning Area Huntington State Beach ...... Non-Incorporated Land '----=Within Planning Area w` Least Tern fv 0 os i Natural Preserve MILES nasasource-ctoe�orFrsnawioaiae4=aia�.GA0sp1alPaft9R roatlop(XII) Bepemap Bourse:ptty o/Mua0n,9on 8ncA('MO. -- Hnn[iaQlon Bence f, Established Habitat Areas Figure E C-4 s� f { City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-21 The City faces numerous key challenges to maintaining and protecting habitat including a complicated regulatory environment, numerous overlapping stakeholder groups, ecological degradation through water and air pollution, invasive pest plants, and changing climate conditions. This element establishes policies to collaboratively maintain, manage, and expand, when possible, important habitat lands, including the coast, wetlands, bay, and inland areas. Energy Resources Energy comes in numerous forms, including chemical fuels such as coal and oil, heat energy, and nuclear energy.This element focuses on electricity and natural gas (a form of chemical energy), which °i are two of the most common kinds of energy used in Huntington Beach. Electrical energy is used to run innumerable appliances, devices, and pieces of technology, including lights, computers, and air conditioners. It can also be used as a transportation fuel for electric vehicles. Natural gas can be used to generate electricity and to heat water and indoor spaces. Electricity in the planning area is supplied by Southern California Edison, while natural gas is supplied by the Southern California Gas Company. Table ERC-6 shows current and forecasted electricity and natural gas use in Huntington Beach. Table ERC-6 Current and Forecasted Energy Use MEN= I's Residential electricity 885,753, 110 7487,243.,550 490,786,730 494,662,470 use(kWh) Nonresidential 726,213,200 703,114,370 743,073,060 791,265,320 electricity use (kWh) Total electricity use 1,211,966,610 1,190,357,920 1,233,859,780 1,285,927,790 (kWh) Residential natural 31,156,530 30,363,590 30,735,350 31,796,430 gas use (therms) Nonresidential natural gas use 9,328,020 10,210,450 10,857,240 11,811,700 (therms) Total natural gas use 40,484,550 40,574,040 41,592,590 43,608,120 (therms) K, Source:Southern California Edison;Southern California Gas Company 2020 and 2040 values are projections Wthoutlocallydriven efforts to reduce energy use. 4-22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Huntington Beach has the option of establishing an alternative to Southern California Edison by participating in a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA, sometimes called Community Choice Energy or CCE) program. CCA is a mechanism that allows local governments to control the electricity supply and rates for their communities. Under a CCA, local governments procure electricity from their desired sources, but rely on existing infrastructure owned by private utilities to distribute the energy and conduct billing. Residents and businesses in CCA communities can choose to receive electricity from the CCA,or they can continue to receive service from a private utility. CCAs are government agencies, formed by a single community or by multiple communities working jointly. Energy use in homes and nonresidential buildings is determined by the design and construction of the building, the types of devices and appliances in the building, the presence of any on-site renewable energy systems such as rooftop solar panels, and the behavior of the people who use it. In general, new buildings are being designed and constructed to use less energy, and many newer appliances use less energy than older models. The California Building Standards Code (BSC, also called Title 24) specifies minimum energy efficiency standards for new buildings. These standards are updated to require increased energy efficiency standards for new construction approximately every three years, moving toward a goal of zero net energy (ZNE)for all new buildings. A ZNE building is one that generates as much energy as it uses,as measured over the course of one year. ZNE buildings combine extensive energy efficiency features with on-site renewable energy systems.The state plans for new houses to be ZNE by 2020, and for new nonresidential buildings to be ZNE by 2030. In future years,state and federal policies are likely to continue to require increased and greater energy efficiency for buildings and appliances.At the same time,the cost of energy for Huntington Beach's homes and businesses is expected to continue to increase. Huntington Beach will work to keep energy bills low, foster increased energy independence, and promote a healthy environment by supporting energy efficiency, energy conservation,and renewable energy throughout the community. These strategies will also help move the community in the direction supported by California's ZNE policies. Mineral Extraction Potential Oil and Natural Gas Huntington Beach is home to numerous land-based resources including oil and natural gas. Huntington Beach has been the site of oil extraction since the 1920s,and large-scale oil and gas production continues today. Most oil and gas production to.date in California and in Huntington Beach has been from vertical wells into traditional oil and natural gas reservoirs.Oil wells in Huntington Beach are scattered throughout much of the planning area. Most are concentrated along the coastal areas and mesas. According to the US Geological Survey(USGS),oil reserves in the Huntington Beach oil field are estimated to be between 117 and 866 million barrels of recoverable oil. ;Po' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-23 Natural gas extraction exists onshore and offshore in and around Huntington Beach. According to the California Department of Conservation, roughly 745,000 million cubic feet of natural gas was withdrawn from Huntington Beach in 2012. When it is extracted,natural gas is composed of approximately 80 percent methane and 20 percent other substances. Large amounts of the other components of natural gas are removed during processing. All oil and gas wells drilled and constructed in California must adhere to strict requirements, including general laws and regulations regarding the protection of underground and surface water, and specific regulations regarding the integrity of well casings, the cement used to secure well casings inside bore holes, and the cement and equipment used to seal off wells from underground zones bearing fresh water and other hydrocarbon resources.Given the city's history of oil extraction activities and the presence of natural gas fields under the city,there is a high potential for methane to be present in subsurface soils. High concentrations of methane can pose a health or safety risk. Methane hazards have resulted in City regulations and procedures to ensure proper mitigation and abatement. In future years,oil and natural gas extraction in the planning area is expected to continue. While these activities will provide economic benefits to the community,they may also pose health, safety,and environmental hazards. Huntington Beach will work to continue oil and natural gas extraction and receive the benefits these actions provide, while continuing to ensure that the impacts to the community from oil and natural gas extraction are minimized. Mining Resources Soils in Huntington Beach are known to contain peat. Peat production occurred in the area from 1941 to 1954. No further mining of peat or other soil conditioners has been known to occur since that time. However,peat is present in various parts of the planning area. Soils containing peat have poor engineering properties, as they are prone to liquefaction, collapse, and settlement and are not suitable for building purposes. Soils containing peat also have a high potential for methane gas. Methane hazards have resulted in City regulations and procedures to ensure proper mitigation. The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) identifies Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) classifications for land located in the planning area. Based on this mapping, a majority of the planning area is designated as MRZ-1 or MRZ-3, which indicates information is unavailable or historic mining has not occurred,and therefore the significance of mineral resources is unknown. Additionally, the urbanized character of Huntington Beach generally precludes mining activities. 4-24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) A small area of land is designated as MRZ-2,which indicates that adequate information is available to indicate that significant construction aggregate deposits are present. This area is generally located along the uplifted mesa north of Talbert Avenue, west of Beach Boulevard, and east of Huntington Harbour.Active mining no longer occurs at these sites, and new uses have been introduced, which deter future mining activities. Figure ERC-5 shows MRZ classifications within the Huntington Beach planning area. Water Resources Water Supply The City provides water to over 50,000 service connections. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) and the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) provide water to Huntington Beach. The City's water comes from a combination of groundwater (approximately three-fourths) and imported water resources (approximately one-fourth) purchased from Metropolitan through the MWDOC. Metropolitan's principal sources of water are the Colorado River and the Lake Oroville watershed in Northern California, and this water is treated at the Robert B. Diemer Filtration Plant located north of Yorba Linda. The Orange County Water District(OCWD) manages the groundwater in the Orange County Basin and allocates a proportion of that groundwater for Huntington Beach. According to the City's 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, total water demand in Huntington Beach is forecasted to increase by roughly 8 percent from 2020 to 2040, with the increase being met using a combination of groundwater sources and imported water based on the OCWD-established Basin Pumping Percentage. Table ERC-7 identifies expected planning area retail demands (i.e., the amount of water used by residential and nonresidential water customers,and unaccounted water loss)through 2040. Table ERC-7 City of Huntington Beach Planned Water Retail Demand (2020--2 40) Total(AFY)EMIF28,0M90 =1 30,153 30,360 30,352 30,396 Note:AFY=acre-feet per year As a result of recent drought conditions since 2012,water conservation efforts significantly reduced the city's water consumption from 2011 to 2015 by over 17 percent, from around 30,000 acre-feet to around 25,000 acre-feet. Orange County Water District's Groundwater Replenishment System Facility takes highly „z treated wastewater that would otherwise be discharged into the Pacific Ocean, further ` purifies it, and pumps it into seawater barriers and groundwater recharge basins. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-25 MA Additional water resources could be provided by coastal desalination plants and recycled water for irrigation and other nonpotable uses. g v '2 City k city of Seal ah Westminster tg Balsa Ave, Ur'8 v m > c m McFadian' (7 0 3 Ave � o z . Edinger Ave Hanurtopi-n` .itarbaar � .. Heil Ave City of Fountain Malley Mmer Ave u ` Sister Ava t 9usa cnKo teEb er q Talbert Ave We ttands a . 01 d z�ka Ellis 1�s Ave s Y CO ��,' GaAietd Ave Yorkiavm Ave e ` IAdamsAve A`€ f Indianapolis Ave 5� tAtianta Ave F milton Ava 0 � LEGEND 61 a nningAve ---- City Limits b Mineral Land Classification C, City of MRZ-1 .� Costa Mesa MRZ- �` ... MRZ-3 W` v tiv o as t 3 r S t f MILES f t Source:CAO�DtarGrnservation Ir984);C$r ofiiuningov Bexh f2�tq,,, �` ll1p�19n geatn i iineraI Resource Zones Figure ERC-- 4-26 R� �a la Water Quality Huntington Beach is associated with the Santa Ana Watershed. The Santa Ana River borders the planning area to the southeast; Anaheim-Barber City channels border the planning area to the north. Several other flood control channels traverse the planning area, including the Bolsa Chica, Sunset, Westminster, Ocean View, East Garden Grove- Wintersburg (EGGWC), Slater, Murdy, Huntington Beach, Talbert, and East Valley- Fountain Valley channels. All water in the planning area ultimately drains into the Pacific Ocean via storm drains, flood control channels, the Santa Ana River, the Bolsa Chica Basin/Wetlands, and Huntington Harbour. Urban debris, litter, and pollution can enter coastal and marine environments either from direct dumping or through the storm drain system.This can adversely affect water quality in the coast, Huntington Harbour, bays,wetland waters,and flood control channels. Debris and litter can be deadly for wildlife which may ingest or become tangled in it. Bacteria or other pollutants that enter surface water bodies may be harmful to human health. In addition to detrimental effects on human and wildlife health, debris, litter, and pollution also greatly reduce the aesthetic appeal of open space areas. Several local organizations and open space parks host public cleanup days multiple times a year. Under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, states,territories and authorized tribes are required to develop a list of water quality limited segments. The waters on these lists do not meet water quality standards, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. The Clean Water Act requires that these jurisdictions establish priority rankings for waters on their lists and develop action plans, called Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL), to improve water quality. Table ERC-8 shows the quality limited segments by pollutants in the planning area. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-27 Table ERC- 2010 California 303(d) and T DL Priority • i i W 8k Enterococci Unknown Low X Indicator Bacteria Unknown Low X Chlordane Unknown Low _.....-.............- -- - ---- --X-- -----C�PpefUnknown ..........._...._.._._..-_....�._..._.. - -Low ....-- X' Lead Unknown Low X X' Nickel Unknown Low X' Pathogens Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers Low X Dieldrin Unknown Low X X' X PCBs Unknown Low X X Ammonia Unknown Low X pH Unknown Low i X X Sediment Toxicity Unknown Low X=Listed on the 2006 Clean Water Act Section 303(d)List ofWater Quality Limited 1=Listing made by US Environmental Protection Agency. 2=Priority determined by"estimated TMDL completion data"listed in the State Water Resources Controlt3oard's 2010 Integrated Report on Water Quality.All pollutants and mterbodies on this list have an estimated completion date of2019 or later,indicating`low'priority. The City faces numerous water supply and water quality problems. Water supply concerns include continued groundwater overdraft conditions, future imported water costs and allocations, continuing drought conditions, State Water Resources Control Board water use reductions, and the financial and ecological costs associated with developing alternative supplies. Water quality issues include pollution associated with local and upstream urban runoff and sensitive ecological conditions. In this Environmental Resources and Conservation Element, the City addresses these issues with goals, policies, and programs that require water conservation, pursue recycled and alternative water resources,and reduce local water pollution in new and existing development. 4-28 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Issues, Goals, and Policies The open space issues addressed in this element include: • Meeting parks and facilities needs • Providing recreation programs and services to meet community needs • Managing the beach, parks, and recreation to accommodate diverse recreational needs The conservation issues addressed in this element include: • Reducing air pollution • Meeting greenhouse gas reduction goals • Identifying and protecting habitat areas and connections • Protecting habitat resources in wetlands • Protecting coastal habitat resources • Protecting trees • Protecting habitats in parks • Conserving energy in homes and businesses • Expanding renewable energy sources • Preserving mineral extraction potential • Protecting and conserving water resources • Maintaining water quality Meeting Parks and Facilities Needs The City currently meets established standards for providing park and recreation facilities. However, anticipated growth will increase demand for increasingly diverse and ever- changing recreation programs, park facilities, and community youth and senior center services. Recreation programs, available park acreage, and potential sites for new or expanded parks should be periodically assessed. Demand is strong for parks that feature active recreational facilities and support team sports as well as those that provide access to natural environments. Since much of Huntington Beach has been developed, park space must be used efficiently and strategically added as part of new developments or reuse of existing facilities, such as closed schools. The adequacy of Quimby Act in-lieu fees and parkland open space development impact fees to meet community needs and alternative funding methods for park development, renovation, and repurposing should be periodically evaluated. f City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-29 Goal ERC-1. Adequately sized and located parks meet the changing recreational and leisure needs of existing and future residents. Policies A. Maintain or exceed the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, including the beach in the calculations. B. Seek opportunities to develop and acquire additional parks and open space in underserved areas where needed, including pocket (mini) parks, dog parks, athletic fields, amphitheaters, gardens, and shared facilities. C. Distribute future developed park and recreational sites to equitably serve neighborhood and community needs while balancing budget constraints. D. Require all park improvement projects to consider ways to improve access to park facilities by foot and bicycle. E. Continue to locate future neighborhood parks adjacent to elementary schools with independent street frontage when possible. F. Continue to balance and maintain a mix of recreational focused and passive and natural environment areas that preserve and protect special-status species within open spaces. G. Develop a comprehensive trails network linking hiking, biking, and equestrian trails to parks, beaches, recreation facilities,and open spaces both within and outside the planning area. H. Administer the City's open space program in a manner that supports lands, resources, and services provided in regional parks, open spaces, and conservation plans. Providing Recreation Programs and Services to Meet Community Needs The aging of the general population and resulting increases in the senior population will increase demand for senior services.The city's senior and elderly population would greatly benefit from additional and accessible social services to serve their needs. Meanwhile, demand for programs for families, children, and other components of the community remain high. Goal ERC-2. Diverse recreational and sports facilities provide active and educational opportunities that meet the changing needs of residents and visitors of all ages. Policies , a A. Enhance and expand accessible and affordable recreation programs and sports facilities, providing new programs and adaptive facilities that respond to changing community demographics and needs. 4-30 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) B. Ensure that buildings, equipment, fields, and other recreation amenities are in full use and capable of accommodating changing program demands. C. Partner with neighboring cities and the County to provide access to a wider range of recreational services. D. Encourage and coordinate with private commercial recreational businesses to provide recreational services and facilities that may not otherwise be offered by the City. E. Partner with school districts to offer after-hours recreational activities at both open and closed school sites. F. Work with the school districts to encourage after school hours access to playgrounds and playing fields on school properties. Managing the Beach, Parks, and Recreation to Accommodate Diverse Recreational Needs The beaches and adjacent marine environments provide habitat for numerous species, including federally listed birds that use the beach for nesting. While important biologically, coastal dunes, beach, the surf zone, and the off-shore areas are also recognized as important cultural amenities. Beach management practices should improve the sustainability of extensive recreational beach use while protecting sensitive natural resources. Goal ERC-3. Maintain the recreational and cultural identity of the beach while improving and enhancing the overall habitat value of coastal areas. Policies A. Maintain the beach and ocean as natural recreational resources, not only for the city but also for the Southern California region. B. Maintain the current high level of recreational access to the coast and its recreational facilities and continue to provide resources that improve accessibility to the beach for all users. C. Consider devoting certain portions of the beach to different preferred recreational uses while maintaining access for all users and meeting the recreation needs of both visitors and residents. D. In areas known to be utilized by special-status species, encourage low-intensity uses that provide public access and passive recreational resources such as picnic/observation areas, nature trails, peripheral bike paths, and informational signs/displays. r City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-31 Reducing Air Pollution Air quality in the South Coast Air Basin has generally been improving for a long period of time due to cleaner vehicles,technological advances,and increased regulatory oversight Continued improvements in air quality will help improve public health and increase the overall quality of life in Huntington Beach. The community should work to support cleaner air while addressing challenges posed by population growth and climate change, which could stall or reverse these hard-fought gains in air quality. Goal ERC-4. Air quality in Huntington Beach continues to improve through local actions and interagency cooperation- Policies A. Continue to cooperate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and other regional, state, and national agencies to enforce air quality standards and improve air quality. B. Continue to require construction projects to cant' out best available air quality mitigation practices, including use of alternative fuel vehicles and equipment as feasible. C. Enforce maximum idling time regulations for off-road equipment. D. Require grading, landscaping, and construction activities to minimize dust while using as little water as possible. E. Continue to explore and implement strategies to minimize vehicle idling, including traffic signal synchronization and roundabouts. F. Minimize exposure of sensitive land uses to toxic air contaminants by locating new pollutant sources away from sensitive uses and disproportionately affected communities and by encouraging existing pollutant sources to reduce emissions when changes to existing operations or permits are proposed. Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals As there are numerous sources of GHG emissions,a variety of strategies are available to help local communities reduce these emissions.Establishing and meeting GHG emissions reduction goals will help to decrease the threat posed by climate change, while providing multiple benefits to Huntington Beach community members. Efforts to reduce GHG emissions can help save money for residents and businesses, enhance the local economy, improve public health, support improved air quality, and conserve water and other natural resources. The goals and policies below establish emissions reductions goals and create a high-level framework for GHG reduction efforts. Policies that support GHG emission reductions are located elsewhere in this element, as well as in the Circulation and Public Services and Infrastructure Elements. Specific strategies,anticipated reductions,and associated action items are addressed in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program. 4-32 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Goal ERC-5. Greenhouse gas emissions from activities occurring in Huntington Beach are reduced to levels consistent with state goals. Policies A. By 2020, reduce community-wide greenhouse gas emissions to 15 percent below 2005 levels. By 2040, reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 53.33 percent below the 2020 target, placing the community on a path to meet the state's 2050 greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. B. Encourage oil drilling operators to implement cost-effective best practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with oil extraction. C. Explore strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from off-road construction and landscaping equipment. D. Support efforts by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the California Air Resources Board to decrease greenhouse gas emissions from large industrial facilities and other stationary sources. E. Pursue funding sources to develop and implement programs and projects identified in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program. Identifying and Protecting Habitat Areas and Connections Protecting areas in Huntington Beach that have potential habitat area, such as wetlands, coastal areas, parks, and water bodies, can be challenging as they are managed by a variety of agencies and organizations which have different levels of jurisdiction and authority over the resources present. Several areas that provide potential habitat value also support other uses requiring routine maintenance (e.g., beaches, parks). Connectivity between open space areas is an essential element of species conservation. Wildlife corridors refer to established migration routes commonly used by resident and migratory species for passage from one geographic location to another. Corridors are present in a variety of habitats and link areas of suitable wildlife habitat that are otherwise separated by changes in vegetation, rugged terrain, or human disturbance. Fragmentation of open space areas by urbanization creates isolated islands of wildlife habitat. Maintaining the continuity of established wildlife corridors is important to (a) sustain species with specific foraging requirements, (b) preserve a species'distribution potential, and (c) retain diversity among many wildlife populations. The majority of Huntington Beach, including its surroundings, has been built out; however, the undisturbed portions a. around the perimeter and off-site could facilitate regional wildlife movement. Specifically, Huntington Harbour connects the Bolsa Chica Wetlands to the off-site Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge. 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-33 Goal ERC-6. Various agencies that oversee habitat areas and wildlife corridors, including but not limited to parks, beaches, coastal dunes, marine waters, and wetlands, coordinate decision-making and management to ensure ongoing protection of resources. Policies A. Create, improve, and/or acquire areas that enhance habitat resources and identify, prioritize, and restore as habitat key areas of land that link fragmented wildlife habitat, as funding and land are available. B. Support land acquisition, conservation easements, or other activities undertaken by landowners to create and preserve habitat linkages that support the integrity of ecosystems. C. Preserve and enhance the connection between the Huntington Beach Wetlands and the wetland/riparian area in Bartlett Park via the Huntington Beach Channel. D. Use future specific and area plans as a means to complete wildlife corridors. E. Establish aquatic and terrestrial connections between the Bolsa Chica Wetlands and Central Park by restoring areas in the oil fields to a more natural environment. Protecting Habitat Resources in Wetlands Huntington Harbour, the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, the Huntington Beach Wetlands, the Talbert and Huntington Channels, and Anaheim Bay are used as spawning and nursery areas for a number of marine fishes, including important commercial fishes, and are utilized by threatened and endangered birds. Past development and the ongoing modifications to the Santa Ana River mouth and Huntington Beach Wetlands outlet have directly impacted areas through filling, dredging, and channelization. Urban runoff has also affected these areas. Stormwater runoff from streets with oil, grease, and trash is known to adversely impact marine biological resources and wetlands. Possible sea level rise also threatens to affect the stability of the wetlands. Goal ERC-7. Wetland areas that serve as important biological resources for threatened and. endangered birds, fish, and other species are protected and restored y� i 4-34 "' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Policies A. Protect important wetland areas in the planning area through land use regulation or through nonprofit land trust or public ownership and management. B. Maintain and enhance existing natural vegetation buffer areas surrounding riparian habitats and protect these areas from new development. C. Support County efforts to designate and manage environmentally sensitive lands—such as the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, the Huntington Beach Wetlands, and lands near the mouth of the Santa Ana River and north of Newland Street—for inclusion into a coastal wetlands preserve. D. Minimize filling, dredging, and channelization of river and wetland areas other than necessary dredging to keep the tidal channel open. E. Reduce pollutant runoff from new development and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable. F. Continue to evaluate and mitigate the effects of domestic and industrial wastes on living marine resources. G. Seek opportunities to naturalize flood channels while also enhancing flood protection capacity. Protecting Coastal Habitat Resources Coastal dunes, the beach, the surf zone, and offshore areas serve both important biological functions and as important recreational amenities. Coastal dunes have been reduced by urban development erosion and degradation and the intensification of beach uses. Goal ERC-& Coastal dunes and habitat resources remain resilient to potential impacts of encroaching development, urban runoff, and possible sea level rise. Policies A. Sustain the biological productivity of coastal waters and maintain healthy populations of species of marine organisms adequate to support long-term commercial, recreational, scientific,and educational purposes. B. Promote the improvement of tidal circulation in the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, Huntington Harbour, Huntington Beach Wetlands, and Anaheim Bay and minimize impacts to sand migration, aesthetics, and usability of the beach area. C. Prohibit development that jeopardizes or diminishes the integrity of sensitive or protected coastal plant and animal communities, accounting for expected changes from sea level rise. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-35 Protecting Tress The city has many established trees,some of which form groves,such as those in Central and Norma Gibbs Parks.These trees provide nesting and roosting areas for both birds and butterflies, as well as perches for raptor species.The City has not developed a system to identify and protect trees and groves of biological value. Tree maintenance and utilities within the public right-of-way are often in conflict, leading to some trees not being replaced. Goal ERC-9. Huntington Beach's trees and groves serves important biological functions, including but not limited to nesting and roosting areas for both birds and butterflies, and perches for raptor species. Policies A. Identify, track, and protect trees and groves on public property that provide valuable habitat. B. Maximize and maintain tree coverage on public lands and in open spaces. Protecting Habitats in Parks z While City parks are designed primarily to support recreational use, portions of parks that have remained undeveloped or have been "naturalized" (e.g., the Shipley Nature Center in Central Park)provide habitat resources.The three freshwater lakes in Central Park are used by a number of waterfowl and other birds. Other lakes located throughout the planning area can provide habitat for a variety of resident and migratory bird species. These areas should be protected from impacts that may occur from recreation or nearby uses,such as trash or urban runoff. Goal ERC-10.An enhanced network of parks, open spaces, and recreation facilities contributes to habitat preservation. � Policies A. Continue to preserve portions of parks as natural habitat for a variety of species. B. Continue to naturalize disturbed areas within parks and prevent the invasion of exotic plants. Design nature parks and natural areas so that habitat value for wildlife is `R emphasized on par with recreational value for people. C. Evaluate incompatible recreation activities which may damage open spaces and sensitive habitat areas. D. Support the use of native vegetation and green infrastructure in parks to manage water use, reduce urban runoff impacts, and provide natural habitat. 4-36 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Conserving Energy in Homes and Businesses Despite high electricity prices, Huntington Beach community members and other residents and businesses in California enjoy some of the lowest electricity bills in the country due in part to widespread energy efficiency and conservation efforts. Continuing and enhancing energy efficiency and conservation strategies help residents and businesses save money, and conserve valuable resources needed to generate energy. Energy efficiency programs also help support the local economy and can make Huntington Beach more resilient to future disasters by decreasing stress on existing energy distribution networks. Goal ERC-11. Energy use in existing buildings declines due to energy efficiencv upgrades and energy-conscious behavior. Policies A. Publicize rebates and other financial incentives available to community members to improve energy efficiency in their homes and businesses, and market these rebates and incentives to all community members through a variety of outreach strategies. B. Promote low-cost or free weatherization programs for disadvantaged residents, including low-income families and elderly individuals. C. Identify ways to increase energy efficiency retrofits in multifamily buildings, renter-occupied homes, low-income homes, and leased nonresidential space through retrofits and educational programs. D. Retrofit existing City facilities to be more energy efficient as opportunities arise. Goal ERC-12. New buildings are increasingly energy efficient and ultimately eguipped to support zero net energy performance. Policies A. Create incentives for proposed development and reuse projects to exceed the minimum energy efficiency standards established in the California Building Standards Code when constructing new or significantly renovated residential and nonresidential buildings, including achieving zero net energy performance in advance of state-level targets. B. Promote the use of passive solar design techniques and technologies in new buildings to reduce energy use for heating and cooling. C. Construct all new City facilities to be more energy efficient than the minimum energy efficiency standards in the California Building Standards Code, and achieve zero net energy performance for new City facilities when possible. Expanding Renewable Energy Sources Current energy resources are generally viewed as limited and unsustainable. Consequently, the City should prepare for and encourage conservation and pursue City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-37 alternative energy sources. Community education regarding energy efficiency continues to be important, and the City could take additional steps to encourage both municipal and distributed solar photovoltaic development and new technologies and energy sources. Goal ERC-13. Increase both distributed generation and utility renewable energy sources within municipal and community-wide practices. Policies A. Encourage the use of solar energy systems in homes and commercial businesses as a form of renewable energy, including in support of zero net energy goals. B. Encourage renewable energy options that are affordable and benefit all community members. C. Create incentives that promote renewable energy systems as a component of new development or reuse projects. D. Maximize renewable energy capacity on municipal property and renewable energy use in City-sponsored projects and activities. E. Support opportunities to increase energy storage capacity in the community. F. Support Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) feasibility studies. G. Support public-private partnerships on energy efficiency, energy storage, and microgrid development to achieve cost savings, reduce energy use, and improve energy reliability. Preserving Mineral Extraction Potential Oil, gas, sand, gravel, and peat extraction has occurred in the past in Huntington Beach; large-scale oil and gas production continues to the present time. Mineral extraction provides economic benefits, but also exposes the community to hazards such as subsidence, methane exposure, and potential environmental contamination. The City intends to balance these considerations and safely preserve mineral extraction potential. Goal ERC-14. Mineral resource extraction continues to provide economic benefits, while threats to health,safety, and environmental resources are minimized. Policies A. Identify appropriate access areas, and permit extraction of significant oil and other mineral resources in designated resource areas. B. Ensure that mineral/oil resource production activities avoid or minimize potential environmental impacts and are compatible with adjacent uses. C. Ensure mineral/oil resource extraction areas are properly reclaimed and/or remediated after resource extraction has been terminated. 4-38 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Protecting and Conserving Water Resources Although Huntington Beach has relatively good access to available groundwater, additional steps should be taken to protect water resources and conserve water in home, business,and public settings to prepare the city to sustain the future population. Drought- tolerant landscaping, recycled water infrastructure, saltwater reclamation, and groundwater replenishment represent opportunities to conservewater,develop new water supplies, and sustain valuable groundwater resources for long-term use. Goal ERC-15. Adequate water supply is available to the community through facilities. infrastructure,and appropriate allocation. Policies A. Maintain a system of water supply and distribution facilities capable of meeting existing and future daily and peak demands, including fire flow requirements, in a timely and cost- efficient manner. B. Monitor demands on the water system, manage new development and reuse projects and existing land uses to mitigate impacts and/or facilitate improvements to the system, and maintain and expand water supply and distribution facilities. C. Evaluate participation in Orange County Water District's recycled water program, and explore opportunities for the City to produce its own recycled water for use within the community. D. Continue to explore innovative alternative water infrastructure improvements, including but not limited to groundwater injection, maximizing groundwater recharge/percolation, and desalination. Goal ERC-16. Water conservation efforts are maximized in every aspect of use. Policies A. Continue to require incorporation of feasible and innovative water conservation features in the design of new development and reuse projects. B. Encourage maximum water conservation in existing land uses, and provide incentives that encourage building owners and homeowner associations to complete water efficiency retrofits. C. Require the use of recycled water for landscaping irrigation, grading, and other non-contact uses in new development or substantial retrofit projects where recycled water is available or expected to be available. D. Partner with and provide information to community organizations, residents, and businesses regarding methods to reduce water use. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 4-39 Maintaining Water Quality Urban stormwater runoff occurs when rainfall is collected by storm drains instead of being .� absorbed by groundcover or soil (commonly seen in a nonurban environment). When it rains, trash, silt,automotive chemicals, fertilizers,animal wastes,and other contaminants are washed into the storm drain system. Since storm drains are designed only to carry stormwater,they are typically not equipped with filters or cleaning systems.Consequently, they can carry contaminants found in urban runoff directly into flood control channels, creeks, rivers, and the ocean. Many of the contaminants found in runoff affect water quality, and can, at elevated levels, be toxic to aquatic and marine life. Increased surface water runoff will likely result from new development and reuse projects and existing land uses in Huntington Beach, potentially degrading already polluted waters. Goal ERC-17. Enhance and protect water quality of all natural water bodies including rivers, creeks, harbors, wetlands, and the ocean. Policies A. Require redevelopment to comply with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit and other regional permits issued by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. B. Require that new development and significant redevelopment projects employ innovative and efficient drainage technologies that comply with federal and state water quality requirements and reduce runoff and water quality impacts to downstream environments. C. Continue to require new development and significant redevelopment projects to propose protective safeguards and implement best management practices that minimize non-point source pollution and runoff associated with construction activities and ongoing operations. D. Continue to require that new development and significant redevelopment projects incorporate low-impact development best management practices, which may include infiltration, harvest and reuse, evapotranspiration, and bio-treatment. E. Prioritize investment in green stormwater infrastructure that restores natural landscapes before employing other management solutions. F. Reduce pollutant runoff from new development to marine biological resources and wetlands by requiring the use of the most effective best management practices currently available. G. Partner with and provide information to community organizations, community members, and businesses regarding best practices to minimize runoff and improve groundwater recharge. H. Reduce impacts of new development and significant redevelopment project sites' hydrologic regime (hydromodification). I. Continue working with the County and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on the Integrated Regional Water Quality Management Plan to explore and expand more regional treatment of stormwater runoff. 4-40 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) i V. Natural and EIRVIromental Hazards VFIN' Introduction and Purpose p ink; Maintaining a safe environment for community members and visitors is one of the City's most important responsibilities. Huntington Beach's continued ability to thrive will depend in part on its ability to prepare for future emergency situations, particularly in the context of changing environmental conditions. The community must be resilient to a wide range ''' of safety hazards and able to recover quickly when emergencies occur.Planning decisions should consider the risks posed by natural and environmental hazards, so that the community can grow and evolve in a way that reduces potential hazards as much as possible. This element offers a background and tools to address the risk from various safety threats. z Ly City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-1 Scope and Content The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element satisfies the Safety Element requirements of state planning law, which is a mandated component of the General Plan. Section 65302(g) of the California Government Code sets forth the following list of issues that the element must cover,if these items pertain to conditions in the planning area: • Seismically induced conditions including ground shaking, surface rupture, ground failure, tsunami, seiche,and dam failure • Slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides ' • Subsidence, liquefaction, and other geologic hazards • Flooding Wildland and urban fires Evacuation routes Now._.. i= State law allows communities to address additional safety issues. The following additional issues are addressed in this element: Coastal hazards • Hazardous materials and waste • Aircraft hazards • Disaster and emergency preparedness The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element consists of this Introduction and Purpose identifying the intent of the element and how it relates to other documents; a Hazards Plan discussingthe natural and environmental risks present in Huntington Beach and how they may change; and Issues, Goals, and Policies providing tools to prepare for emergency situations, improve community resilience, and allow for rapid recovery. Relationship to Other Elements The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element identifies areas prone to natural hazards, which must be considered in the designation of land uses in the Land Use Element. For example, proposed land uses must comply with the land use compatibility standards contained in this element for various types of hazards. Traffic-calming goals and policies in the Circulation Element may have implications for emergency response, and recommendations for evacuation and emergency access routes in the Natural and Environmental Hazards Element affect the Circulation Element. The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element is also linked to the Natural and Environmental Hazards Element, because open space zones and allowable uses are often related to hazard-prone locations. For example, areas prone to landslide hazards are often set aside as open space because their steep slopes limit other uses. 5-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) fl Relationship to Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Under the provisions of the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and California Government Code Sections 8685.9 and 65302.6, local governments can adopt a local , hazard mitigation plan into their safety element. If a community has not done so,the state will only reimburse the community up to 75 percent of eligible costs associated with emergency response and recovery from a specific situation. Communities with a hazard 3 ?� mitigation plan incorporated into their safety element may receive more than 75 percent of eligible costs from the state. The City of Huntington Beach adopted a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2012, which was approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) and is in compliance with the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. The 2012 Huntington Beach Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and all subsequent amendments and updates are hereby incorporated into this Natural and Environmental Hazards Element by reference as though they were fully set forth herein. A copy of the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is on file in the City's Emergency Operations Center. RUNS Plall The following natural and environmental hazards pose a safety risk in the planning area. Geologic and Seismic Hazards Geologic and seismic hazards are risks caused by the movement of different parts of the earth's crust, or surface. The most familiar type of geologic or seismic hazard is an earthquake, which occurs when parts of the earth's crust move rapidly past each other and cause the ground to shake. This movement can in turn trigger many other types of secondary hazards, including the following: • Surface rupture, which occurs when the surface of the ground cracks or breaks above the area where an earthquake occurs. • Liquefaction, which occurs when soil becomes waterlogged and loses much of its strength, damaging or destroying structures built on or in it. • Landslides, which happen when the shaking of an earthquake causes loose material to slide down a slope. • Subsidence,which occurs when the ground surface drops. • Tsunamis, which are large, fast-moving waves or walls of water that can flood low- lying coastal areas. r City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-3 Figures HAZA through HAZ-4 identify locations of known geologic and seismic hazards in the planning area. Like much of California, Huntington Beach is located in a seismically active area (Figure HAZA).The Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone runs through the community (Figure HAZ-2), and other faults, including the San Andreas Fault, the Elsinore Fault, and the San Jacinto Fault, are located within approximately 50 miles. These faults and many others are capable of causing major earthquakes which could impact the planning area. Parts of the planning area are at an elevated risk of liquefaction (Figure HAZ-3), particularly near the coast and in the Huntington Harbour neighborhood. Although largely flat, some areas of the community are at risk from earthquake-induced landslides (Figure HAZ-3). Ilk Historically, the area between Goldenwest Street and Seapoint Street is prone to subsidence (Figure HAZ-4), and tsunamis may threaten low-lying coastal areas of the community, including Huntington Harbour and parts of Downtown. 3 7 5-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) d f - _03 tU � Lo C p T... L o� too At CL c6 r r° j o cq 4< � P W U- ds o L W W iji [ .z� .. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-5 --,-e �, city ' " E �.. Cry of Seal Beach tNestrirtt x � BtslsaAve � c � tdeFaiddems' Eiliec Ave F p Fieb Ave Fouatoin ValleyAve TalwtAve REY �+ .:, �,� � �..�,._�.,....- i .,r... GarfWd A" cyw F Yetlaavm Ave Adams Ave W I 1a-poltenve Ave z. +. FlemitoaAve Dk F �a I LEGENDizz r -----Aiquist-Priolo Zone Faults 0 City rat -- Newport Inglewood Fault Zone N costa Mesa 5 City Limits Major City Streets ot as a s DALES ' om seura;ow xamP*x ey err tm+x} . '�a•yiP Swres.C�j'dHauNiW^�eaen.t2giq,... Local Faults Figure HAZ-2 ra a k' 5-6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) a� City of City 4' as„ wnster seat sopeb B A. v v McFadden,: ' Ave ✓'4Y- z a tt EdingerAva z c He}IAvo �' x city of Fountain Valley / YVia rAve ' + 80t0 Ctslla "KalYfert dove wenondr A" n s o Ave 1 l g� YwMovm Rve Adam Ave �� Indrana� Aue �� J. Ave ;Wt rlllrvi4+ r �at�iul�l i s LEGEND nrr- Earthquake Induced Liquefaction Potential a Landslide Zone Low City of —�-- City Limits A , High to Medium r to Mesa — Major City Streets High to Very High ` Very High N 0 0.5 I v s r.vLE5 emso�:oma�w,rw�tcynrnct�vs) ' Base RRkn scum:CRY of Hununppon 6R oo 414T" Beard Seismic Hazard Zones (Liquefaction and Landslide) Figure HAZ-3lj f tl City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-7 rt� Of city E i.cc stm' seat Bet W 1tttratRrtster m Bo%a Ave' - - z v wwJ m Wadden Ave <.. to, z HuaNrr" Harbour � Heiillve ' City of F uatatn Vaal Ave � 3 IMNMMM. ~Vy ;,�y Slater Ave Off$ On TaibadAvs low Bobo C9�ica woftr4ft _ to p� EIW g m (� Wre E a i N GwI Id Ave y` Yarktavll Avs .. Adams Ave tru ulapolkAve �,, AflantaAve A TP, >; _ \ A` � TilllUlfl Ave nning Ave LEGEND ` •� �,, pity Of --•— City Limits Subsidence(inches) � to Mesa ---- Major City Streets 0 to-0.1 -0.5 to-0,5 -0.1 to-U -0.6 to-0.7 �r 0.2 to-0.3 -0.7 to-0.8 fA ti` n' o o.s i \ .0,3 to.0.4 -0.8+ N4 ES -0.4 to-0.5 or:sp o.,�«p ra m vwc plat Saes Rap S.--:C:'ti d nuutlnfiba S..h 014)' Subsidence Figure HAZ- � 1 •. e 5-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) (1 Tsunamis are an important hazard of concern for Huntington Beach, with the ability to impact the entire length of coastline in the planning area. Tsunamis are often caused by earthquakes occurring below or near the ocean floor, although underwater volcanic eruptions and landslides can also generate these waves. Tsunamis can travel vast distances, and are capable of causing damage far away from the site of event that generated them. Huntington Beach may be affected by a tsunami caused by a local event, or by an event thousands of miles away elsewhere in the Pacific Ocean. The California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) estimates that the Huntington Harbour neighborhood, the area northeast of the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, and the southeast corner of Huntington Beach are at an elevated risk of a tsunami, as shown in Figure HAZ-5. IM Coastal Hazards As a community with both bluffs and low-lying areas near the coast, Huntington Beach is at riskfrom two types of coastal hazards. High tides and high surf continually erode coastal N bluffs located along the shoreline. This condition is often exacerbated by wind and inadequate drainage practices from development on top of bluffs. Beaches underneath " the coastal bluffs can act as a protective buffer; however, these protective beaches themselves can be eroded away, particularly when structures such as seawalls, jetties, and breakwaters interrupt the natural processes that maintain the beaches. The Huntington Beach coastline totals 9.5 miles of shoreline, including both state and City beach areas. Beaches and other low-lying portions of the planning area are threatened by sea level rise, a slow but gradual process that may cause average sea levels to increase by as much as 5.5 feet or more by the year 2100. Current science indicates that sea level rise is directly linked to climate change, and sea level is expected to increase over time. An increase in the frequency of intense storms that affect California is one possible effect of climate change, and any such increasewould also likely increase erosion through high surf and storm surges. Higher sea levels may increase community vulnerability to hazards such as storm surges and tidal flooding, and may also exacerbate coastal erosion by decreasing the size of protective beaches. To support the General Plan, and in accordance with adopted guidelines of the California Coastal Commission, the City prepared a vulnerability assessment estimating the consequences, probability, and resulting risk from various sea level rise scenarios. Depending on the scenario, additional land located near the coast could be subject to varying degrees of shoreline erosion and more extreme storm-related flooding. These :E hazards could threaten private buildings, public facilities, roads, and beaches. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-9 3 E u s city of city of Seal Beach bV stmin t r Balsa Ave § t fn hAcF€trkJen AviLU r, Z EdingerAve A u el Ave LI Ave City ofFountain Valley Slater Ave Talbert Ave w EDis `» to . z Ave m u� �t '' nta Awe c} ni[torrAve Or LEGEND , Y Evacuation Routs Of Tsunami Evacuation Area Ar mesa 0 0.5 1WIN w 0 t t i r t MILES Q Sow*;CA@ix9mcy M�rtN�mattAY�t!f EiU§��trY'atHM+�Z[�m 9rsii436E1i �. $ � Tsunami Evacuation Map Figure HAZ- � � t r r► 5-10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) This assessment looks forward to 2100 to determine the specific extent of the citys vulnerability to sea level rise, including an inventory of potentially affected assets and their estimated replacement value. Although most of this General Plan looks to the year 2040, 'Pool the sea level rise assessment identifies vulnerabilities on a much longer horizon for multiple reasons. First, while the sea level rise assessment relies on the best available science and methods, there is an inherent degree of uncertainty in these projections, meaning sea levels could rise faster or slower than the estimated projections. Second, as current science indicates that sea level rise is a consequence of climate change, the amount of sea level rise could exceed estimates if the activities that cause climate change end up being greater than expected.Additionally, a building constructed within the horizon { of this General Plan may still be used toward the end of the century; thus, it is important to understand potentially hazardous conditions within the planning area in 2100 to cover the life span of a building. Both coastal and inland areas face threats from sea level rise. The threat to coastal areas is the result of erosion and flooding from wave run-up (particularly from large waves associated with coastal storms).Sea level rise threatens the inland areas by exacerbating flooding from very high tides, and by contributing to flooding from extreme rainfall events. Areas subject to potential coastal or inland sea level rise by 2050 are identified as a , Potential Sea Level Rise Hazard Area in Figure HAZ-6. The Sunset Beach and ° Huntington Harbour neighborhoods and areas located south of the Huntington Beach Pier face the highest risks. The planning horizon of this General Plan is 2040, although the hazard area reflects areas of potential impact by 2050. This extra time helps ensure that projects proposed near the end of the General Plan horizon will still benefit from increased resiliency to sea level rise for several more years. It also provides a safety margin in the event that future sea level rise is more severe or occurs more rapidly than anticipated in current modeling, as previously discussed. Sea level rise risks within the hazard area are addressed by the Huntington Beach Coastal Resiliency Program (CRP). Strategies outlined in the CRP include monitoring and implementation of regulations to minimize impacts in low-lying coastal areas of the city, constructing new infrastructure in less vulnerable areas or using methods more resilient than current standards, considering sea level rise when planning shoreline protection structures,and encouraging new development in less vulnerable areas. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-11 r`1 iy rdom Aa city f City of cL $mI S3 5$ t cc Sea[Beach } E+ska Awe' m Northern v Planning amme sit � lier'�A�e g city'Of Q Fou; tiu Valey m ay s a rAve Central wrrrr �,� Planning arerA,�e • Ia err TabeftAw 6, �• �� Age c I,, J m �t c °+ 'Ycxkbwn Me Southern ®Planning Aw _ Area rsdianivolsAve bus A%e Ave Ap LEGEND � F1nprC itr Sh�atm � r Sy gAMz —•-•Cite l.im it ern 21750 ConM,gent Ftoomw:g Zo>e Cky of � nena 2050 Tt3al Fbambgione r Cbsta Mesa Cm stal2050 rtoaaing Zone fib.*.a AVs3erway Pi :4:.g Aaeao CP 2050 T ida I Fbod ing 5ce re rio R• ° E 0 OIZ- 1r Tide:7.1 a ft yea r Relu m Fb riodli ti SLR:2 JW it(2050 High) s rvtey Combined WalerLa-el:9.18$(KAV08s) SYffioa.CL orylYtlbyNNY9iNINdi4o'6sat4 bY0 ffisuc.:CXN e1........... v fl�llttli�t�ti t Potential Sea Level Rise Hazard Areas (2 ) Figure HA -6 5-12 " City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) i Flooding Flooding in the planning area can be caused by a number of natural events, including " heavy rains and coastal storms. Less often, floods can be caused by high tides (tidal flooding), or tsunamis (discussed in the Geologic and Seismic Hazards section). Flood events can also happen as a result of infrastructure failure; for example, if a water tank breaks. Flooding is the most common hazard in the planning area. , Areas at an elevated risk of flooding are generally divided into 100-year flood zones and ' 500-year flood zones.A 100-year flood zone has a 1 percent chance each year of a major " flood; a 500-year flood zone has a 0.2 percent chance of flooding each year. As identified in Figure HAZ-7, the planning area has areas within both flood zones. As land uses and climate conditions shift and as improvements are made to flood control channels,the size of these flood zones is likely to change. m Failure Dam failure is a specific type of flood event that occurs when a dam experiences a partial or complete collapse, releasing a large volume of water that can rapidly flood downstream -COM areas. Dam failure can occur due to structural weaknesses of the dam itself, as a result of another hazard such as an earthquake, or as a combination of both. Dam failure events are very rare, as dams that are large enough to hold back large quantities of water are usually built to very high safety standards. If there is an elevated risk of dam failure, dam operators will often release water from the dam in a controlled manner, so that if the dam . does fail the resulting flood will be minimal. No dams are located in the planning area, although two dams upstream along the Santa Ana River, Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, could flood large portions of the planning area if they experienced a catastrophic failure (see Figure HAZ-8). Both dams are flood control dams that usually store water during and after a flood event. However, Prado Dam stores water most of the year and releases it in a controlled manner down the Santa Ana River to recharge the groundwater aquifer underlying Orange County.Although upstream dam failure could occur, it is likely only a threat to Huntington Beach during a relatively small part of the year when the reservoir behind Prado Dam is at its fullest. t City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-13 t Simi. X500 X500 on cc City of Seal Beach Bolsa Ave McFadden Ave A � rn s I A X500 3 I AE City of vE y AE e SlaterAve WbartAve VE A A Ave Q25F 9 z ©arReM Ave y' Yorktovyn Ave m Adams Ave LEGEND Flood Zone"type 100 Year Flood Zone it —Major City Streets VE AE AE •• C Limits 500 Year Flood Zone P4 lie v8 Outside Flood Zane -16, A N � 0 0-5 1 Ave I r I I a FtILES AE may` Annual PmbaM1)ry of Floodrtg of t%ar Gnata Itaa-year Ftnotl Evatt) AE H3FI�tOn Ave ' A Subled to 10Dyearfkp3.Base food devatim undetermined AE ar Ai-A00 F.'tIU)ed to 104Yeer hood.Base flood alew0an delmrdnad. 0@ V ie. E Banning Ave AH 3ltyed to 100.year Malim foaling(usuely areas arpwding)�vdh Ca le average depth of l-3 fast.Base Aood elevation dctamdnad. y� AO 3rbiect to tabyeer shallow flooding(usualy sheet flow on.sloping terrain) !,rats' AE I vmh average depth of l-]feat.Bass flood elevadat.undstamsnad. Costa mesa { . bjeIXto 10(Lyear flootl end atlotbcnel velxiry Hazard Nave acfian) V Base flood elevation Undetermined. y AE VE or V1-v3o Sutaed to100•yenrflood and addibmal veloc)ry hazard Nave adian). „p Base food elevation detamined. 0 Annuar Probability of Flooding of 0.2%to 1%(400year Flood Even11 VE. X500 Both B and X500 represent areas between the fmas ofthe tea-year and 500-ysar toed,or certain areas subjed to 100-year Aaod with B or mo average depths Ins Men 1 toot or•mere the cmd biih g damage area is Iesa Men 1 mfiere mile:r areas pIde ted by levees ken Data Sawn:Federal E—ows yManageerone dro 1a0-Ynf Aood. Sasem p,5—City of ttunbrptat Be DWI— Flood Hazard Areas Figure HAZ-7 5-14 '"' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 1 CA �frY+ r� sP k 'S¢ Ilk s s X�ji'E t� mat f LEGENDC, is Prado Reservoir Inundation �-.._ City Limits c — Major City Streets w E 0 0.5 i s tv9 ES ow 8—:CAM.wE—w"'Y sr*.i"Dm'. U"V.P Sass.:city 9sa0.4*14 y yam Dam Flooding Areas Figure - City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-15 (1 Urban Fires As an urbanized area surrounded by other urbanized communities, Huntington Beach does not face the wildfire risks that are a threat to other areas of California. Urban fires are the primary fire hazard in the planning area, which can be caused by electrical faults, unattended cooking, or flammable or combustible materials exposed to a heat source, among other causes.Several areas and activities pose unique urban fire challenges due to the age of buildings, the size and density of structures,and the presence of flammable or combustible materials. The California Government Code requires safety elements of a general plan to identify land designated as a State Responsibility Area for fire services and land designated within a very high fire severity zone. There is no land with either designation located in the planning area. Hazardous Materials and Waste Hazardous materials are materials that pose a significant risk to public safety or human or environmental health. These include toxic chemicals, flammable or corrosive materials, petroleum products,and unstable or dangerously reactive materials. They can be released through human error, malfunctioning or broken equipment, or as an indirect consequence of other emergencies (e.g., if a flood damages a hazardous material storage tank). Hazardous materials can also be released accidentally during transportation, as a consequence of vehicle accidents. The majority of hazardous materials in the community are being transported on truck routes along major roadways.Some parts of the planning area, including in the northwest industrial area and along the Gothard Street corridor, have large concentrations of industrial facilities that may store, manufacture, use, and/or dispose of hazardous materials on site. In previous years,sewage and petroleum products were involved in the majority of hazardous material spills reported in the planning area. Soils in Huntington Beach have a high likelihood to contain methane gas, which is often found in the same location as petroleum and in areas with peat in the soil. Methane is the primary component of natural gas and so is a valuable natural resource. In 2014, fossil fuel companies extracted approximately 754 billion cubic feet of natural gas from Huntington Beach and surrounding areas. Despite its usefulness, methane is extremely flammable, potentially explosive, and may cause asphyxiation in high enough concentrations. As shown in Figure HAZ-9, the City has identified Methane Hazard Overlay Districts where soils are likely to contain increased areas of methane. Future development sites located in these districts must be tested for elevated levels of methane in the soil prior to construction, and future development or reuse projects may be required to include vent systems and/or barriers to reduce the level Of methane to a safe concentration. There is no difference in requirements between the two districts. 5-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) ii TYJ 4a �. Seal Beach city of Bola Ave McFadden TI E � Ave, � Hutah ��Nerhour HeiAve City of main Malley . IA✓:1r rAve- WerAve 'Cat 7albertAve Bobo Chkn Weftands g w8a Elias s Ir Z, Avg ME N� t ma ti Ave AdamsAve IhdiariapoRoAveA/a.t.A,. '. LEGEND ► ttm Ave - Major City Streets �••••• City Limits Methane Districts cry 1 costa Via' 2 �5 ry w 0 G.5 1 MLES HE"ton Methane Hazard Overlay Districts Figure FiAZ- � • s, a City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-17 tl Aircraft/Airport Hazards cc Aircraft crashes can be a major hazard, as they can significantly damage or destroy structures adjacent to airport facilities or within flight paths, and cause harm to both people in the aircraft and on the ground. These events typically cause fires, which may spread ., beyond the initial emergency site if not contained and can release hazardous materials into the environment. While there are no airports in the planning area, there are multiple airports in the vicinity, including John Wayne Airport, Long Beach Airport, and Los Angeles International Airport, as well as the military Joint Forces Training Center in nearby Los Alamitos. Studies have found that aircraft departing from or arriving at these airports may pass lower than 2,000 feet above the planning area, which can generate noise in excess of 70 dBA. There are also multiple heliports within the planning area. Disaster and Emergency Preparedness The Huntington Beach Emergency Management and Homeland Security(EMHS)office is responsible for coordinating emergency preparedness activities in the planning area, often in cooperation with neighboring cities,the Orange County Sheriffs Department, the Water Emergency Response Organization of Orange County (WEROC),and state and federal agencies.As part of this responsibility, the EMHS office and other City organizations have set up multiple programs to make Huntington Beach more resilient to disasters and to improve the effectiveness of emergency response activities when a disaster occurs.These programs include the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), which trains members of the public to effectively respond to a disaster; drills and exercises for emergency response staff; the Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Services (RACES) program; and the preparation of preparedness plans such as the Huntington Beach Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). 5-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Goals, and Policies The natural and environmental hazard issues addressed in this element include: • Preparing for and mitigating geologic and seismic hazards • Preparing for a changing coastline = ` • Minimizing flooding and tsunami hazards • Reducing potential urban fire risks �w • Remediating brownfield sites • Managing hazardous materials and wastes • Reducing potential aircraft hazards • Preparing residents and businesses for future disasters • Reducing potential threats to homeland security Preparing for and Mitigating Geologic and Seismic Hazards Earthquakes and other geologic and seismic hazards are among the most severe threats facing the planning area. Studies by the US Geological Survey indicate that Southern California will be affected by a major earthquake within the next few decades. In addition to the impacts associated with ground shaking, such an earthquake could cause other geologic/seismic hazards, urban fires, hazardous material spills or other incidents. To prepare for such events,the City will ensure that existing buildings are resilient to geologic and seismic hazards; community members are informed on how to stay safe during and after these events; and key City facilities can continue to provide vital services during response and recovery activities. Goal HAZ-1. Structures are designed and retrofitted to be more resilient to earthquakes and other geologic and seismic hazards, protecting against injury while alsoreserving the structural integrity of the structure. Policies A. Ensure that new and significantly retrofitted structures are sited and designed to reduce the risk of damage from geologic and seismic hazards. B. Support retrofits to existing structures to improve resiliency to geologic and seismic hazards. C. Construct new key facilities to be resistant to damage from geologic and seismic hazards. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-19 l D. Maintain records of existing structures in Huntington Beach that may be vulnerable to geologic and seismic hazards, including unreinforced masonry structures, older concrete buildings, and wood structures with weak first floors. Preparing for a Changing Coastline Under the most conservative planning scenarios, both coastal and inland portions of Huntington Beach could be periodically flooded due to the cumulative impact of storm surge and higher hightime e' tides,as well as the possibility of sea level rise. In anticipation, the City will establish new standards and requirements to ensure that vulnerable areas are protected; new development is planned appropriately to accommodate changing conditions; and existing beach and wetland resources adapt and become more resilient. Goal HAZ-2. Coastal environments accommodate coastal changes and reduce coastal development impacts. Policies A. Promote appropriate land uses and development patterns within potential sea level rise areas identified in the Sea Level Rise Hazard Area established in Figure HAZ-6. B. Implement priority measures to reduce and mitigate sea level rise impacts to property and infrastructure outlined in the Coastal Resiliency Program. C. Promote land use changes and development patterns that conserve coastal resources and minimize bluff and coastal erosion. D. Continue to support beach sand replenishment projects located north of the planning area that will support sand deposition on beaches in the planning area. E. Provide information to property owners about the risks associated with coastal erosion and flooding and encourage them to take adequate steps to prepare for these risks. F. Provide sufficient warning and evacuation assistance to community members impacted by coastal flooding events. G. Increase the City's understanding and funding for public improvements with respect to potential vulnerabilities and impacts to infrastructure associated with changes in sea level elevation. H. Monitor potential ocean surf line hazards. 5-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Minimizing Flooding and Tsunami Hazards Portions of Huntington Beach are susceptible to flooding and many areas experience recurring local flooding during extreme high tide events,rainstorms, and storm surges. In addition, some open space and residentially developed areas(approximately 2 percent of wow the planning areas) are below sea level. These conditions could be exacerbated by sea level rise in the future. For example, low-lying areas that experience flooding may . experience greater flooding for longer periods of time. In addition, areas that are prone to flooding could have unsustainable flood-insurance requirements in the future, potentially sit depressing property values and making homes less desirable. The failure of Prado Dam { near the head of Santa Ana Canyon poses a remote flooding threat if the basin were nearly full during a failure. Due to the location on the coast, Huntington Beach is also subject to potential run-up and tsunami damage from both distant and locally generated tsunamis. NCD, Long-term ponding of water during heavy rains or lengthy periods of precipitation is likely 0 in some areas. IIW Goal HAZ-3. Residents, businesses. visitors, and resources are adequately urotected from risks associated with flood and tsunami hazards. Policies A. Establish and maintain local flood prevention standards and practices that adequately protect public and private development and resources within the planning area. B. Maintain and increase local storm drain capacity to meet 100-year or greater flood protection requirements to protect residents and businesses from flood risks. C. Provide sufficient warning and evacuation assistance to residents and others impacted by flooding and tsunami events. D. Continue to identify tsunami-prone areas and establish development, emergency response, and recovery standards and procedures within these areas. E. Continue to identify, manage, and repair or renovate areas that experience long-term ponding during heavy rain events. Reducing Potential Urban Fire Risks Building size and density, age of structures, and the presence of certain materials or activities all contribute to the risk of urban fires in Huntington Beach. Goal HAZ-4. The risk of urban fires is reduced through effective building design and effective fire services. Policies A. Ensure that all new construction is designed for easy access by fire and other emergency i response personnel. �E9 B. Ensure that existing buildings are maintained to minimize fire risks. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-21 n Remediating Brownfield Sites Due to historical aerospace, oil, and energy production uses and related contamination, several opportunity sites for future cleanup and remediation are located within the cc community. These sites offer new opportunities for brownfield development and reduce the potential for exposure to contaminants for future generations. For the purposes of this General Plan, brownfield sites are defined as properties that are contaminated and underutilized due to perceived remediation costs and liability concerns. The goals and policies provided below are intended to assist the City in the future development of sites that meet this criteria rather than regulate sites with current hazardous waste activities. Goal HAZ-5.Environmental cleanup and management of brownfield sites improves environmental quality of life, desirability of surrounding neighborhoods, economic development, and housing options in the community. Policies A. Continue to identify, map, and remediate existing hazardous waste sites and require remediation when a property is redeveloped. B. Encourage use of remediated brownfields for housing, commercial, industrial, public, and recreational uses and for open space opportunities while prioritizing open space uses, energy facilities, and other community-supporting facilities as preferred options for future use of remediated brownfield sites. C. Prohibit the future placement of sensitive land uses in close proximity to hazardous material and waste sites. Managing Hazardous Materials and Wastes While brownfield sites pose a risk from hazardous materials that may have leaked into the environment in previous years, Huntington Beach community members and visitors also face risks from hazardous materials that are transported through the community or used x as part of current activities, including vehicle and pipeline transport. The City can reduce risks from these materials by ensuring that proper safety practices are in place, and that emergency responders and community members have information necessary to protect themselves. Goal HAZ-6: The risk of exposure to hazardous materials in Huntington Beach is substantially decreased. Policies A. Avoid locating facilities that use, store, transport, process, or dispose of hazardous materials near residential areas or other sensitive uses. B. Promote the use of roadways with minimal exposure to residential areas or other sensitive uses as routes suitable for transporting hazardous materials. 5-22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C. Ensure that all community members have access to information about proper handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials, including electronic waste. + D. Continue to develop and enforce Methane District Regulations to reduce the hazards from methane-containing soils. E. Continue to implement the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) program to identify, inspect, and monitor businesses that use and store hazardous materials in the city. Reducing Potential Aircraft Hazards Several widely used airports are located close to the planning area. Although accidents involving aircraft are rare and there is little the City can do to decrease the risk of such an event happening, Huntington Beach can take proactive steps to ensure a safe and tSt effective response. WOW Goal HAZ-7. The damage from potential aircraft hazards is reduced through W increased preparation and coordination. I Policies We A. Maintain consistency with the Airport Environs Land Use Plans for all applicable airports and helipads. B. Review and update City emergency preparedness and response plans and procedures for responding to aircraft emergency situations. C. Coordinate any aircraft disaster response activities with the appropriate airport fire response organization. Preparing Residents and Businesses for Future Disasters No matter how low the risk, natural and environmental hazards can never be completely eliminated. However, education and training programs can reduce property damage and bodily harm resulting from emergency situations. Community members can also prepare themselves for hazard events to improve response and recovery after an emergency occurs. Goal HAZ-8: Community members are well informed and equipped to make their homes and businesses more resilient to natural and environmental hazards, and to rapidly and successfully recover from them. Policies A. Educate community members about hazard risks present in Huntington Beach and ways to effectively reduce risk. . I`4, City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 5-23 tl B. Ensure that all emergency plans are fully inclusive of the community members of Huntington Beach. C. Support the Community Emergency Response and Training (CERT) program, as feasible, depending on the availability of funding and volunteers. Reducing Potential Threats to Homeland Security + Huntington Beach is a desirable location to live and work as well as a destination for over 11 million visitors annually. r Large-scale events such as the US zoo Open of Surfing attract large crowds every year. In addition, the beach and Downtown area attract a wide variety of visitors on a regular basis. These cc conditions have increased the need for enhanced emergency response and preparedness activities throughout the community. As a result, a portion of the City's emergency response resources are used to address planning and policy issues associated with homeland security,as well as to regularly monitor activities within these areas. In recent years, some events have escalated, causing minor property damage and injuries and resulting in additional police response. Goal HAZ-9. Residents and businesses are protected from human-caused and terrorism-related hazards. Policies A. Recommend emergency personnel become engaged in proactive community policing activities during special events. B. Ensure City procedures and protocols are updated to reference departmental roles in the Emergency Operations Plan, which outlines response and recovery activities for terrorism and civil unrest in the city. C. If deemed necessary during a large community event, activate the Emergency Operations Center to ensure effective coordination of emergency response activities. D. Expand emergency management planning and preparedness activities to include anti- E terrorism components. 5-24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 93 VL Noise � Introduction and r3 � J t a k Y Purpose The Noise Element describes how the City considers noise control in the planning process.This element identifies noise-sensitive land uses and noise sources,evaluates existing noise issues, defines potential noise impact areas, and advocates creative methods to protect the community from excessive noise.The element provides proactive solutions to noise problems varying from construction noise and clamoring mechanical equipment to roadway noise and the cacophony of barking dogs, and describes noise control measures designed to avoid noise problems before they occur. The noise environment relates to a community's quality of life. Noise has been linked directly to numerous human health factors; aside from general annoyances, excessive noise is a source of discomfort, interferes with sleep, and disrupts communication and relaxation. 34 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-1 ca Recognizing that excessive or unusual noise affects human health and welfare, the state has developed guidelines both for determining community noise levels and for establishing tow programs to reduce community exposure to adverse noise levels. Policies, plans, and programs outlined in the Noise Element are designed to minimize the effects of human- caused noise in the community, and to improve residents' quality of life by regulating and reducing noise, particularly in residential areas and near such noise-sensitive land uses as residences,hospitals, convalescent and day care facilities, schools, and libraries. The element provides direction regarding practices and strategies to protect city residents and businesses from severe noise levels. Mixed-use residential and commercial development present unique noise reduction challenges. Although located in predominantly commercial environments, the residential portions of mixed-use projects are nonetheless subject to residential noise standards and guidelines established by the state. Strategies to address these noise concerns focus on incorporating noise-reducing features into project design. Scope and Content California Government Code Section 65302(f) establishes the requirement for a noise element to "identify and appraise noise problems in a community" and to "analyze and quantify, to the extent practicable...current and projected noise levels."The noise element must identify the sources of noise and identify both existing and future noise contours— distances at which a predicted noise level will occur. State law requires that the noise element consider the following major noise sources: • Highways and freeways • Primary arterials and major local streets • Railroad operations • Aircraft and airport operations • Local industrial facilities • Other stationary sources This element consists of this Introduction and Purpose summarizing the general purpose of the Noise Element; a Noise Plan describing fundamentals of sound and noise, defining noise standards, presenting contour maps,and recommending strategies to achieve goals and implement policies;and Issues,Goals,and Policies outlining the most important noise issues affecting the planning area. n T�" 6-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Relationship to Other Elements Noise policies and programs affect implementation of the Land Use Element as it relates to both noise sources and noise-sensitive uses. The noise contours and land use compatibility standards contained in the Noise Element should be used when evaluating planning and development decisions. The Noise Element also relates directly to the Circulation Element, because Huntington Beach's primary noise sources are transportation-related noise along arterial roadways and highways, and, to a lesser extent, the freeway, railways, and aircraft. Noise policies mitigate excessive noise along transportation routes.Similarly, noise policies relate to the Housing Element by directing new housing development to appropriate sites away from sources of excessive noise and requiring that design features be incorporated to ensure acceptable indoor noise levels. N01se Plan The following describes the fundamentals of sound and noise, defines noise standards, and presents contour maps. Measuring Noise Noise Fundamentals Noise sources in Huntington Beach fall into two categories: transportation oriented and non-transportation oriented. Examples of transportation-oriented noise include noise generated by vehicles, airplanes, and rail cars operating within the planning area. Examples of non-transportation noise include noise generated from mechanical or industrial processes,such as oil extraction, lawn equipment, and construction activities. Noise is most often defined as unwanted sound.Although sound can be easily measured, the perception of noise levels is subjective and the physical response to sound complicates the analysis of its effects on people. People judge the relative magnitude of sound sensation in subjective terms such as noisiness or loudness. Sound pressure magnitude is measured and quantified using a logarithmic ratio of pressures,the scale of which gives the level of sound in decibels (dB). Table N-1 presents the subjective effect of changes in sound pressure levels. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-3 C3 Table N-1 Changes in Sound Pressure Levels, dB -. 4 ei ME mum- +/- 3 dB Threshold of human perceptibility +/- 5 dB Clearly noticeable change in noise level +/- 10 dB Twice/half as loud +/-20 dB Louder/much quieter Source:Engineering Noise Control,Bies and Hansen(1988). To account for the pitch of sounds and an average human ear's response to such sounds, a unit of measure called an A-weighted sound pressure level (dBA) is used. Noise Descriptors Several rating scales have been developed to analyze the adverse effect of community noise on people. Since environmental noise fluctuates over time, these scales consider that the effect of noise on people is largely dependent on the total acoustical energy content of the noise as well as the time of day when the noise occurs. The following common metrics describe the way humans perceive sound: • Laq, the equivalent energy noise level, is the average acoustic energy content of noise for a stated period of time. For evaluating community impacts, this rating scale does not vary, regardless of whether the noise occurs during the day or the night. • Ldn, the Day-Night Average Level, is a 24-hour average Leq with a 10 dBA weighting added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the nighttime. The logarithmic effect of these additions is that a 60 dBA 24 hour Leq would result in a measurement of 66.4 dBA L.. • CNEL,the Community Noise Equivalent Level,is a 24-hour average Laq with a 10 dBA weighting added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., and an additional 5 dBA weighting during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the evening and nighttime. The logarithmic effect of these additions is that a 60 dBA 24-hour Leq would result in a measurement of 66.7 dBA CNEL. • Lmin, the minimum instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time. • Lmax,the maximum instantaneous noise level experienced during a given period of time. In 6-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 Assigning the proper noise descriptor when evaluating a noise source is essential to determining potential environmental impact on the community. Stationary-source noise (e.g., leaf blowers; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; and loading docks) is generally analyzed using an hourly standard (L.J. Transportation noise sources (e.g., vehicular traffic, aircraft overflights, and train pass bys)occur as variable, individual events throughout the day. Hourly descriptors are not effective at describing transportation noise because it occurs at all hours. Instead, a 24-hour descriptor (Ld, or CNEL) is used to analyze transportation noise sources because the evening and nighttime penalties are applied to reflect increased sensitivity to noise during the evening and nighttime hours. CNEL is the noise level descriptor, consistent with state guidelines, applied by the City throughout this Noise Element to describe the current and future noise environment affected by transportation-generated noise. Noise Sources and Concentration Areas Land uses in the planning area include a range of residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, recreational, and open space areas. In general, the greatest source of noise throughout Huntington Beach is vehicle roadway noise generated along arterial roadways, as well as minor arterial roads within residential areas, and various stationary sources such as commercial heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC)units and petroleum extraction activities. Mobile Sources Roadvveys Traffic noise originates from vehicles traveling on roads, with major roads such as Beach Boulevard, Bolsa = Chica Street, Goldenwest Street, Adams Avenue, Brookhurst Street, and Pacific Coast Highway being significant contributors due to the volume and composition of traffic. Roadway noise is a combination of direct noise emissions from vehicles and the sound of tires passing over the road surface. In addition, large volumes of truck traffic 4 can dramatically contribute to roadway noise, as the sounds generated from some vehicle brake technologies, large tires, and diesel engines greatly exceeds noise from passenger cars and light trucks. ; City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-5 ca Railways • The Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way runs east of Gothard Street, extending from the northern city limits to a terminus just north of Garfield Avenue. It provides freight service for the industrial corridor located along Gothard Street and is generally not located adjacent to noise-sensitive land uses. Current rail service is extremely limited, with approximately three trains per week traveling through the planning area. Although no specific proposal is anticipated at this time, the City intends to preserve options for future passenger rail transit along this corridor throughout the planning horizon of the General Plan. Aircraft No airport is located in the planning area, and no major flight corridors overlie Huntington Beach, although aircraft approaching or leaving nearby airports may fly over the community. Long Beach Airport is located approximately 12.5 miles to the northwest of the planning area, and John Wayne Airport is located approximately 3.5 miles to the southeast. The planning area is not located within the noise contours for either airport. According to a Noise Analysis Report prepared by Veneklasen Associates in 2007, flights approaching Long Beach Airport regularly pass over the area near the intersection Bolsa Chica Street and Edinger Avenue at an altitude ranging between 1,600 feet to 2,100 feet. Individual commercial aircraft flying at these altitudes can result in noise levels of approximately 72 dBA on the ground. The control of aircraft flying over the city and the noise they make are under the jurisdiction of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). As such,the City has no authority over their operations. Stationary Sources Construction Activities Construction activities are a regular and ongoing source of noise throughout the planning area. Noise levels generated by construction activities are generally isolated to the immediate vicinity of a construction site and occur during daytime hours in accordance with City regulations for relatively short-term periods ranging from a few weeks to a few months. Commercial and Industrial Uses Existing commercial uses are predominantly located in regional shopping centers such as Bella Terra, in Downtown Huntington Beach, and along the blocks adjacent to both sides of Beach Boulevard, Gothard Street, Edinger Avenue, and Warner Avenue. The primary noise sources associated with commercial 6-6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 uses are commercial HVAC systems.Other noise sources include truck noise associated with the delivery of goods, as well as human activity. ai.rr t Industrial uses are located primarily in the northwestern portion of the planning area L'b (including and adjacent to the Boeing campus), along the Gothard Street corridor, in the Holly-Seacliff area, and along Pacific Coast Highway (near and including oil production facilities and the AES power plant). Aside from oil extraction, most industrial uses consist of warehousing, including vehicle and equipment storage along the Gothard Street corridor. Similar to commercial uses, the primary exterior noise sources associated with these uses are related to HVAC systems and medium-duty commercial trucks. Land use changes anticipated in both the northwest industrial area and along the Gothard Street corridor will gradually transition to a mix of lighter industrial and commercial uses characterized by research and development and technology uses. These land use transitions are intended to be more compatible with sensitive receptor uses located in the vicinity of these areas, as these uses would be less noise intensive. Oil Extraction Huntington Beach has been an active site for oil extraction since the 1920s, and large- scale oil and gas production continues. Oil wells are scattered throughout much of the planning area, although most are concentrated along the coastal areas and mesas. Noise sources associated with oil extraction activities are related to heavy-duty vehicle use, including noise associated with site preparation, and are considered similar to construction noise levels. Special Events Many parks provide facilities for organized sports including baseball, soccer, and basketball. Noise from these activities can l have a negative impact on neighboring 9 p residential land uses, particularly at parks where lighted fields allow evening activities. Additionally, the City regularly hosts special (i "I events on a local, regional, and international level. Local events include farmers markets, Surf City Nights, and evening music events in public parks, drawing crowds from a few dozen to a few thousand people. Regional and international events include the Huntington Beach Association of Volleyball Professionals Finals,the BB Jazz Festival at Central Park, and the Association of Surfing Professionals US Open of Surfing. Special events often l use amplification devices,such as public address systems,and feature amplified music. ..; City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-7 C3 W Noise Standards and Land Use Compatibility Huntington Beach has developed land use compatibility standards, based on recommended parameters from the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research,that rate compatibility in terms of normally acceptable,conditionally acceptable, normally unacceptable, and clearly unacceptable. Using these land use compatibility guidelines, the City has established interior and exterior noise standards. Some types of noise are only short-term irritants, like the banging of a hammer, the whine of a leaf blower, or amplified music and crowd noise from outdoor events. City noise regulations, including the Noise Control Ordinance, can control this type of noise. The City's Noise Ordinance (Chapter 8.40 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code) identifies exterior and- interior noise standards, specific noise restrictions, exemptions, and variances for sources of noise in the city.As such,the Municipal Code provides standards against intrusive noises such as loud gatherings, unauthorized construction-generated noise, and other invasive noises. Noise environments and consequences of human activities are usually well represented by median noise levels during the day, night, or over a 24-hour period. Environmental noise levels would generally be considered low below 55 dBA CNEL, moderate in the 55 to 70 dBA CNEL range, and high above 70 dBA CNEL. The City's land use-noise compatibility standards are presented in Table N-2. These standards are used in the land planning stage of the development process to identify project opportunities and constraints.In conjunction with the noise contour maps(Figures N-1 and N-2),the standards may be used to determine whether a certain type of land use would be compatible with the existing and future noise environment. Proposed land uses should be compatible with existing and forecasted future noise levels. Projects with incompatible land use-noise exposures should incorporate noise attenuation and/or control measures within the project design that reduce noise to an acceptable interior level of 45 dBA CNEL or lower,as required by state regulations (California Code of Regulations Title 24) for residential uses. The City's compatibility standards provide only for normally acceptable conditions, and are generally based on state recommendations and City land use designations. These standards, which use the CNEL noise descriptor, are intended to be applicable for land use designations exposed to noise levels generated by transportation-related sources. Land use compatibility noise exposure limits are generally established as 60 dBA CNEL for low-density and medium-density residential uses. However,for medium-high density residential, high-density residential, and mixed-use land use designations, a higher 65 dBA CNEL is permitted. Higher exterior noise levels are more often permitted for multiple- family housing and housing in mixed-use contexts than for single family houses. This is 6-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 because multiple-family complexes are generally located in transitional areas between single-family and commercial districts or near major arterials served by transit,and a more integrated mix of residential and commercial activity(accompanied by higher noise levels) O* is often desired in such locations. These standards establish maximum interior noise ' levels for new residential development, requiring that sufficient insulation be provided to reduce interior ambient noise levels to 45 dBA CNEL. The City's land use compatibility standards are based first on the General Plan land use designation of the property, and secondly on the proposed use of the property. For example, in the mixed-use designation, a multiple-family use exposed to transportation- related noise would have an exterior noise standard of 65 dBA CNEL,and an interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Noise standards for multiple-family and mixed-use land use designations are higher than those for single-family residential areas, reflecting that these uses are generally located along arterial roadways with higher ambient noise levels than single-family residential neighborhoods. The standards are purposefully general, and not every specific land use is identified. Application of the standards will vary on a case-by- case basis according to location, development type, and associated noise sources. Table N-2 Land Use-Noise Compatibility Standards Low Density Single-family, mobile Up to 60 61-65 z66 45 home, senior housing Medium Density, Attached single-family, I Medium High duplex, townhomes, Density, High multi-family, Up to 65 66-70 a1 45 Density condominiums, apartments =Mixed-Use ==:Up MtoIO 71-75 45 Neighborhood Retail, professional Commercial, office, health services, Up to 70 71-75 e6 45 General restaurant, government Commercial offices, hotel/motel Hotel/motel, timeshares,Visitor ', Commercial recreational commercial, Up to 65 66-75 >75 45 cultural facilities ' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-9 5� ✓t 1r�.� Ci ? f c,sad _ -�a� ��,x,� � '�3 ;. F, � Office,financial Office NA NA NA NA institutions i i Semi-public Schools Up to 60 61-65 z66 45 (School) I Semi-public Hospitals, churches, Up to 65 66-70 >_71 45 (Other) cultural facilities Public Poublic utilities, parking NA NA NA NA ME=MINE=MW EMEMMEM Emm EM Research and development, Research and technology, NA NA NA NA Technology warehousing, business I park Manufacturing, Industrial construction, NA NA NA NA transportation, logistics, auto repair Conservation Environmental resource NA NA7NANA conservation Park Public park Up to 65 65-75NA Golf courses, Recreation recreational water Up to 65 66-75 �76 NA bodies Shore City and state beaches NA NA NA NA Notes: 1. Normally acceptable means that land uses maybe establishedin areas Wth the stated ambient noise/eve4 absentanyunique noise circumstances. 2. Conditionally acceptable means that land uses should be established in areas with the stated ambient noise level only when exterior areas are omitted from the project or noise levels in exterior areas can be mitigated to the normallyacceptab/a level. Where the location of outdoor activityareas is unknown,the exterior noise level standard shall be applied to the property line of the receiving land use.Where itisnotpractical to mitigate exteriornoise levels atpatio orb alconies of apartment complexes, a common area such as a pool or recreation area maybe designated as the outdoor activity area. 3. Normally unacceptable means thatiand uses should generally not be established in areas Mh the stated ambientnoise levd. If the b enefits of the projectin addressing other General Plan goals and policies outweigh concerns about noise,the use should be established only where exterior areas are omitted from the project or where exterior areas are located and shielded Ham noise sources to mitigate noise to the maximum extent feasible.Where the location of outdoor activityareas is unknown,the exterior noise level standard shall b e applied to the propertyline of the receiving land use.Where itis not practical to mitigate exterior noise levels atpatio or b alconies of apartment complexes,a common area such as a pool orrecreation area may be designated as the outdooractivityarea. r 4. Interior acceptable means that the b uilding mustbe consfructed so that interiornoise levels do not exceed the stated maximum regardless of the exterior noise level Stated maximums areas determined fora typical worst-case hour during periods of use. 6-10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 In the case of hotel/motel facilities or other transient lodging, outdoor activity areas such as pool areas may not be included in the project design. In these cases,only the interior mot "'" noise level criterion will apply. To ensure that noise produced by stationary sources does not adversely affect noise-sensitive land uses,the City applies a second set of standards. These hourly and maximum performance standards(expressed in L,) for stationary noise sources are designed to protect noise-sensitive land uses. Noise Contours and Impact Areas The community noise environment can be described using contours derived from monitoring major sources of noise. Noise contours define areas of equal noise exposure. Future noise contours have been estimated using information about both current and projected future land uses and traffic volumes. The contours assist in setting land use policies for distribution and establishing development standards. The City completed a study of baseline noise sources and levels in June and July 2014. As part of the study,the City collected long-term (24-hour) noise measurements during a typical weekday at seven locations, and short-term (one-hour) noise measurements at eight locations, in the planning area. Long-term monitoring sites included locations characterized by unique noise generators due to high traffic volumes, large numbers of truck trips, or commercial or industrial activities occurring in the vicinity of noise-sensitive land uses. Short-term monitoring sites were generally located in residential areas where ambient noise levels are anticipated to be lower than those along major transportation corridors and commercial areas. The primary purpose of noise monitoring was to establish a noise profile that could be used to estimate current and future noise levels. Measurements represent motor vehicle noise emanating from highways and freeways,the local roadway network, and industrial land uses. Typical noise sources measured during the short-term survey included vehicular traffic; standard gardening and landscaping equipment such as lawn mowers and leaf-blowers; police, ambulance, and fire sirens; motorcycles; heavy trucks;and typical home maintenance equipment such as handsaws. Of these sources, traffic noise was determined to be the predominant noise source in Huntington Beach. Typical of developed areas, noise levels in commercial and industrial areas were substantially higher than those in residential neighborhoods, particularly along major arterials such as Beach Boulevard, Goldenwest Street, and Bolsa Chica Street. Additionally, the planning area experiences regular aircraft overflight from commercial airlines from Los Angeles International Airport, Long Beach Airport, and John Wayne Airport. Figure N-1 identifies modeled noise contours for baseline year 2014. A number of locations experience noise levels above 65 dBA CNEL, including areas near Pacific Coast Highway, Beach Boulevard, Goldenwest Street, Warner Avenue, Edinger Avenue, Brookhurst Street, Bushard Street,Springdale Street, Yorktown Avenue,and Heil Avenue. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-11 C3 W The Land Use Element anticipates that Huntington Beach will accommodate additional future growth, accompanied by an increase in citywide traffic volumes. Traffic volume increases represent the major anticipated measurable new noise sources in the community over the long term. Figure N-2 identifies anticipated changes in 2040 noise levels along major roads based upon future traffic levels. Noise levels may be expected to rise in areas located near roadways where traffic volumes will increase over time. Specifically, these areas include Bolsa Avenue, Atlanta Avenue, Adams Avenue, Pacific Coast Highway, Bolsa Chica Street, Goldenwest Street, and Brookhurst Street. Developments along the following roadway segments should be reviewed for potential future noise impacts: • Talbert Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Gothard Street • Edinger Avenue between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard • Heil Avenue between Algonquin Street and Bolsa Chica Street • Bolsa Avenue between Edwards Street and Goldenwest Street • Edwards Street between Ellis Avenue and Garfield Avenue • Yorktown Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Main Street • Indianapolis Avenue between Lake Street and Beach Boulevard • Main Street between Palm Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway • Orange Avenue between 3rd Street and 1st Street • Atlanta Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Newland Street • Newland Street between Hamilton Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway Many neighborhoods located along busy arterial streets have existing masonry walls between the roadway and the residential uses. Furthermore, topography in the planning area does not vary considerably.As a result, the contours shown in Figures N-1 and N-2 are considered reasonably representative of actual traffic noise conditions. Nonetheless, it is not possible to evaluate the localized effects of topography and screening by intervening structures on traffic noise within the framework of the Noise Element. Therefore, the City should consider the contour distances conservative estimates of traffic noise exposure (i.e., assuming noisier conditions than may be the case) to be supplemented by more detailed and project-specific study as needed. 6-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 . COD" m +� city O Ewn . Svan Beach - c� � Avd 72 v Mcfadde E Ave a Edinger Ave NwEwef N •,=^*»�• HeiFAve a _ f V4a erAve /�. F 10#url ,a __ 'fetBeiiltt6 Elis in r�wv+ar'vi �r:A iy y ' YorkWtwtAve ,tea, 'fficfj (/` , Ave indlppepobaAve NO Ca � 5� Pwanta AYe O �, `yti +�"osta�lrnsa 0 r LEGEND Noise Contours. - 70 Gan 65 Ldn c�'60 Ldn Q Planning Area .Non-Incorporated Land 0/0 Wtthin Planning Area r hvLsTi Modeled Noise Contours for Baseline Year 2014 Figure N-1 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-13 OP C3 M city ofm E cu v city or Seat BeachL1}slrnirister " McFadden iA v -apt o Ave- of c j CO m 1 � � crr a EdingwAve Harbour t`` r HeNAve City of —nerlbve SlaterAue TafberttlYe aoaacn� j. Elft i j a m xaz 3 08rne1d Ave �t � b d� Yoriddw nAve Sw V 5 m Ave _ f rldianapoks-.ire HPUAWn Ave LEGEND a - Non-Incorporated Land Change in dBA ad 100ft wring Ave -'' UUthin Planning Area 4 Q Planning Area 3 p01 city Of 2 No Change N w 0 0.5 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 a MILES -2 - &sema79owm;¢dry ofHuntlnpon B.a<h(�wy Huntington Anticipates Changes in 2040 Noise Levels Figure -2 6-14 "' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Noise Reduction Strategies o The following strategies are intended to reduce noise impacts within Huntington Beach. These strategies should be employed along the roadway segments identified on page 6-12. Noise Control Ordinance The Noise Control Ordinance authorizes the City to regulate noise at its source, protect noise-sensitive land uses, and establish exterior and interior noise standards for residential properties. The City will continue to apply provisions of the Noise Control Ordinance. State Noise Standards Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, also known as the California Building Code, establishes acoustical regulations for both exterior-to-interior sound insulation and sound and impact isolation between adjacent spaces of various occupied units. The Title 24 regulations state that interior noise levels generated by exterior noise sources shall not exceed 45 dB L-0n,with windows closed,in any habitable room for general residential uses. Roadway Noise Barriers The most efficient and effective means of controlling noise is to reduce noise at the source. However, the City has no direct control over noise produced by trucks, cars, and trains because federal and state noise regulations preempt local laws. Because the City cannot control transportation noise at the source, noise programs and standards use noise reduction methods that interrupt the path of the noise or shield adjacent land uses to reduce transportation noise along freeways, arterial roadways, and rail corridors. Such reduction methods may include building orientation, spatial buffers, landscaping, and noise barriers proposed during site planning and project design. Using noise barriers, such as sound walls, is an effective way to achieve noise standards, but should be considered only after all other practical design-related noise reduction measures have been integrated into a project. New technologies should be used in place of sound walls as they become widely available, unless no other feasible options exist Sound walls may not be desirable in some locations, such as intersections in commercial areas where visibility and access are equally important. For some projects,including those implemented by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) or the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), using sound walls may be the only feasible option or may be beyond the City's control. City of Huntington Beach Genera] Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-15 C3 '�W Truck Routes Truck traffic generates noise that can disturb people in residential and other noise- sensitive land uses. Heavy trucks are not permitted to drive through residential neighborhoods unless they are making a delivery in the neighborhood. Truck routes in Huntington Beach are located mostly on higher capacity roadways to reduce noise on other streets, increase safety, reduce roadway maintenance needs, and improve traffic operations. Stationary Sources Noise levels from stationary sources are addressed primarily at the source. In a mixed- use development, acoustical design should be applied to reduce the exposure of residents to noise from both commercial portions of the development and external noise sources. When addressing stationary noise at the source is infeasible, the aforementioned noise reduction methods will be employed to reduce noise exposure to the levels presented in Table N-3. The most common and feasible method to control exterior-to-interior noise levels is to improve the building structure and use wall/fagade treatments that reduce noise levels. Buildings constructed consistent with the Title 24 of the California Building Code typically provide approximately 15 dBA of exterior-to-interior noise level reduction with windows open, and 25 dBA of noise level reduction with windows closed. Therefore, special consideration must be given to reducing interior noise levels to the required 45 dBA CNEL at noise-sensitive land uses exposed to noise levels in excess of 60 dBA. The ability to perform these calculations requires detailed floor plans and facade construction details. A qualified acoustical consultant should calculate the required noise level reduction and resulting interior noise levels.Table N-3 provides an example of varying levels of building fagade improvements that may be required to comply with the interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL for land uses exposed to three different noise levels: 60 dBA CNEL, 65 dBA CNEL, and 70 dBA CNEL. Residential Project Design To mitigate non-transportation-related noise,the City will require adjustments to site plans, design features, higher insulation performance, spatial buffers, and other measures that absorb and block sound as needed. For example, bedrooms, balconies, and open space areas can be located away from streets and focused toward the interior of a project to reduce noise exposure.The City will develop guidelines to assist developers in designing structures that respond to noise concerns. 6-16 ", City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 Table N-3 Sample Interior Noise Control measures a✓rir _ �/ . , 8 \ , �` �i S - , _ •r ,,yam,! Less than 60 15 dBA Normal construction practices consistent with the dBA CNEL Uniform Building Code are typically sufficient. Normal construction practices consistent with the Uniform Building Code are sufficient with the addition of the following specifications: Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation systems are 60 dBA to 65 20 dBA installed so that windows and doors may remain dBA CNEL closed. Windows and sliding glass doors are mounted in low- air infiltration rated frames. Exterior doors are solid core with perimeter weather stripping and threshold seals. Normal construction practices consistent with the Uniform Building Code are sufficient with the addition of the following specifications: Air conditioning or mechanical ventilation systems are installed so that windows and doors may remain closed. Windows and sliding glass doors are mounted in low- dBA CNELL 66 dBA to 25 dBA air infiltration rated frames. Exterior doors are solid core with perimeter weather stripping and threshold seals. t , Glass in both windows and exterior doors should have a Sound Transmission Classification rating of at least 30. Roof or attic vents facing the noise source of concern should be boxed or provided with baffling. Notes: The information listed in this table represents sample guidance for interior noise control recommendations and is not intended for application to individual development projects,renovations,or retrofits.Noise-sensitive land uses located in areas with noise level exposures exceeding 65 dBA CNEL should perform acoustical analysis on a case-by-case b asis. j I 9 City of Huntington Beach General Plan {Adopted October 2, 2017} 6-17 C3 Issues, Goals, and Policies The noise issues addressed in this element include: • Protecting noise-sensitive land uses • Ensuring land use/noise compatibility • Reducing noise from mobile sources • Mitigating noise from construction, maintenance, and other sources Protecting Noise-Sensitive Land Uses Sensitive land uses have associated human activities that may be subject to stress or significant interference from noise. Noise-sensitive land uses are located in portions of the planning area that vary from moderately quiet residential areas to noisy major transportation corridors. Goal N-1. Noise-sensitive land uses are protected in areas with acceptable noise levels. Policies A. Maintain acceptable stationary noise levels at existing noise-sensitive land uses such as schools, residential areas, and open spaces. B. Incorporate design and construction features into residential, mixed-use, commercial, and industrial projects that shield noise-sensitive land uses from excessive noise. i Ensuring Land Use/Noise Compatibility Some residential, commercial, and institutional land uses, particularly those located along arterial roadways, experience excessive vehicular noise. Commercial and industrial land uses also have the potential to generate noise that can be considered intrusive to noise- sensitive land uses. Mixed-use development projects often include both residential uses located above or in close proximity to commercial uses and stand-alone multi-family residential uses. A unique challenge presented by mixed-use development is that on one hand, such uses desire locations along busy street 6-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 corridors, and on the other hand, state-mandated interior noise requirements for residential uses must be met within the residential portions of such uses. l Goal N-2.Land use patterns are compatible with current and future noise levels. ' Policies A. Require an acoustical study for proposed projects in areas where the existing or projected noise level exceeds or would exceed the maximum allowable levels identified in Table N-2. The acoustical study shall be performed in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Noise Element. B. Allow a higher exterior noise level standard for infill projects in existing residential areas adjacent to major arterials if no feasible mechanisms exist to meet exterior noise standards. C. Minimize excessive noise from industrial land uses through incorporation of site and building design features that are intended to reduce noise impacts to sensitive land uses. D. Encourage new mixed-use development projects to site loading areas, parking lots, driveways, trash enclosures, mechanical equipment, and other noise sources away from residential portions of the development, to the extent feasible. Reducing Noise from Mobile Sources Roadway noise from vehicle traffic is the most common source of noise in Huntington Beach. New development supporting anticipated population growth will increase traffic levels on arterials, resulting in increased noise levels. Future development of several vacant parcels and parcels that may support infill development or reuse will also have the potential to increase roadway noise levels in surrounding neighborhoods. In addition to roadways, rail and aircraft operations create noise in certain portions of the planning area. The general noise environment also includes occasional noise from private, police, emergency medical, and news/traffic monitoring helicopters. Goal N-3. The community is not disturbed by excessive noise from mobile sources such as vehicles, rail traffic, and aircraft. Policies A. Mitigate noise created by any new transportation noise source so that it does not exceed the exterior or interior sound levels specified in Table N-2. B. Prioritize use of site planning and project design techniques to mitigate excessive noise. The use of noise barriers shall be considered a means of achieving the noise standards only after all other practical design-related noise mitigation measures have been integrated into the project. F� C. Employ noise-reducing technologies such as rubberized asphalt, fronting homes to the roadway, or sound walls to reduce the effects of roadway noise on noise-sensitive land " x. uses. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-19 C3 D. Continue to work with local, state, and federal agencies to install, maintain, and renovate highway and arterial right-of-way buffers and sound walls. sr.rn E. Continue to work with regional, state, and federal agencies, including officials at John Wayne Airport and Long Beach Airport, to implement noise-reducing measures and to monitor and reduce noise associated with aircraft: a. Coordinate with Long Beach Airport to modify the approach of commercial aircraft to an altitude of 2,100 feet or higher when passing over the area near Bolsa Chica Street. b. Coordinate with Long Beach Airport so that aircraft delay deployment of landing gear and flaps until they are over the Naval Weapons Station to reduce the noise levels they produce over the community. F. Continue to coordinate with the Federal Aviation Administration, Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, and the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission regarding the siting and operation of heliports and helistops to minimize excessive helicopter noise. Mitigating Noise from Construction, Maintenance, and Other Sources Construction is a necessary x part of community development. Construction noise typically occurs � intermittently, and the amount of noise depends on the nature or phase of construction. Activities such as site preparation, trucks hauling materials, concrete y, pouring, and use of power tools can generate noise. Construction equipment also creates noise that reaches high levels for brief periods. Although these types of noise sources tend to be short term, temporary, and limited, they can be a source of annoyance. 6-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) C3 Goal N-4. Noise from construction activities associated with discretionary projects, maintenance vehicles, special events, and other nuisances is minimized in + residential areas and near noise-sensitive land uses. Policies A. Reduce construction, maintenance, and nuisance noise at the source as the first and preferred strategy to reduce noise conflicts. B. Require that new discretionary uses and special events such as restaurants, bars, entertainment, parking facilities, and other commercial uses or beach events where large numbers of people may be present adjacent to sensitive noise receptors comply with the noise standards in Table N-2 and the City Noise Ordinance. C. Encourage shielding for construction activities to reduce noise levels and protect adjacent noise-sensitive land uses. D. Limit allowable hours for construction activities and maintenance operations located adjacent to noise-sensitive land uses. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 6-21 C3 This page is intentionally left blank. 6-22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) VIR. Public services and infrastructure Y........ ,s s Y A .m 3-, introduction and Purpose 3 2 L: Infrastructure forms the backbone of a city, supporting growth and providing mobility, connectivity,and essential services to the people and places that make up the community. Without adequate water, power, safety, and services, a community cannot grow and thrive. The availability of these services also directs the shape in which the city grows, what development options are available, and how and why people and goods flow in and ` out of the area. While including a Public Services and Infrastructure Element in the General Plan is not required, it provides a means to highlight the existing and future service and infrastructureorl needs of the community. This element examines the current and desired future characteristics of energy,water,wastewater,solid waste,and sewer infrastructure, as well as public services such as police and fire, libraries, marine safety, and schools. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-1 C! ■ r Scope and Content The Public Services and Infrastructure Element is an optional General Plan element. Section 65303 of the California Government Code enables a county or city to adopt "arty ' other elements or address any other subjects, which, in the judgment of the legislative body, relate to the physical development of the county or city."An optional element must y be consistent with the seven mandatory elements and, once adopted, carries the same legal weight as any of the mandatory elements. This element begins with this Introduction and Purpose, which describes the intent of the element and applicable legal requirements. The Public Facilities and Services Plan i identifies the services provided by the police and fire departments, the library and school ME systems, and other community services. In turn, the Infrastructure Plan describes the infrastructure systems supporting water conveyance, wastewater collection and treatment, stormwater management, solid waste collection and disposal, power, communications, and infrastructure finance. Issues, Goals, and Policies then outline community service and infrastructure needs, and identify the desired future conditions for providing services and infrastructure and a strategy to provide them efficiently and affordably. Milk Facilities and Services Plan BMW- ... The City of Huntington Beach provides a variety of public facilities and services to support .�1 " residents, businesses, and visitors. The following discussions identify providers and key facilities supporting police services, fire services, marine safety services, emergency medical services,library services,community services, and schools in the planning area. Figure PSI-1 identifies the location of these facilities. Police ' The Huntington Beach Police Department (HBPD)provides law enforcement services for the 27.3-square-mile Huntington Beach area. The HBPD consists of three divisions: the Administrative Operations, Uniform, and Investigation Divisions. The Administrative Operations Division provides oversight, management, and administrative duties. The Uniform Division is responsible for patrol, air support, traffic enforcement, and special enforcement. The Investigation Division is composed of the Detective, Special Investigation, and Jail Bureaus, providing follow-up on crimes, undercover investigations, and detention facilities, respectively.The Huntington Beach police station is located at City Hall. In addition, three police substations are located on Beach Boulevard, Bella Terra, and 5th Street. The HBPD focuses on providing adequate services to the community it serves. Ensuring plentiful staffing, effective response times, and updated technology are ongoing goals for police services in Huntington Beach. 7-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) i� ., or Ail city Of City of Westminster Seat Ufa sdsa Aye' a A L' Ave ti • _ F,I 1*dirgerAve -' x sa+✓ im '. fiunttra�i Hail Ave city'! FounWrtVatley � a plc �' '•.� m {iVdf AveAye i ShterAve 8o§oChc7' Satb r _._ Talbert Ave Is Ave m s $ r•! FRI 7 Gafti'teldAve tt ® z Yrxkfnvm Ave41 � n ArtemsAva' '' R _ 5� .� � ® Inr}iarcapolisAve � 1s :I , Atlanta Ave Hamiton Ave LEGEND { J, 0 Police Station 0 _ hg,�, nntnp Ave Fire StationCity of © Library `C:,6 pql School �w y V- �r Lifeguard Headquarters Major City Streets E �« City Limits � 7d i ON,U.—D.0—01ed by MP (2914) . bate M.P S....::eky of ftminOW 8—h(2414tMINE # seam Public Facility Locations Figure PSIA City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-3 Fire, Marine Safety, and Emergency Medical Services � z The Huntington Beach Fire Department s (HBFD) provides fire, technical rescue, h hazardous materials, and marine safety response and emergency medical services for the city. In addition to emergency response, the HBFD owlprovides prevention services, including construction plan review and inspections, qt 9 f fire safety inspections, and public education. Fire station locations and response vehicle allocation provides effective response to emergency calls in the city a majority of the time. The HBFD is dedicated to providing the highest quality fire, marine safety,and emergency p 9 9 q tY Y� medical services to protect its community. The HBFD has standards for both fire and emergency medical services,and strives to adhere to them at all times. Tailoring these standards to the Huntington Beach service area, utilizing modern facilities and advanced technology, and being involved in development and right-of-way projects help to ensure ' continued fire and emergency medical services. Libraries The Huntington Beach Library System comprises five facilities. y _� k Program attendance at city n libraries is higher than average, "b, indicating strong support for programs and special activities that could benefit from additional space. The library system also has a strong focus on enhancing ' technology to maximize and supplement the programs and nw services offered. 3 The library has a vision to strengthen public internet access, create and improve early xx reader programs, and provide resources and aid to help students succeed in school. These goals, as well as the desire to reinforce the library system as a cultural and { E community center for Huntington Beach and surrounding areas, are reflected in the policies of this plan. 7-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) n Community Services The City operates numerous public recreational facilities that offer a wide range of activities. These activities r ' include, but are not limited to, adult education, fitness classes, and historical preservation. Enhancing services and facilities for seniors is a particular concern for the City, as these must keep ace with tY P P E the aging of the population. Meeting this and other changing needs for the evolvingdemographics of Huntin ton Beach area priority to ensure the mental, physical, 9 P tY :.Z and social well being of residents. Schools Huntington Beach is served by one high school district, the Huntington Beach Union Higha School District(HBUHSD),which also serves portions of Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Seal Beach, Westminster, and parts of unincorporated Orange County. The Huntington Beach City School District (HBCSD), Westminster School District (WSD), Ocean View School District(OVSD),and Fountain Valley School District(FVSD) provide middle and elementary school services in the planning area. The HBCSD is the only school district that provides services solely within the planning area, while all others cover areas within 'i s surrounding communities. y ,! School facilities were built during a time of high demand to accommodate the needs of the a post-World War II baby boom. As space demands for the school districts decrease in response to demographic shifts in the community, the City has the potential to work with the school districts to promote healthy environments for learning. This includes focusing on improving and supporting existing facilities, and supporting school district efforts to promote programs for all stages of education. Engendering a positive, mutually beneficial relationship between schools and the City can also promote and expand the availability of useable, active parks and open spaces throughout Huntington Beach. Infrastructure Plan Although often unseen, the following infrastructure systems that support the Huntington Beach community provide valuable services that enhance the health, safety, welfare, and x , economic viability of the community. The following discussions highlight key challenges City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-5 a and opportunities surrounding provision of water conveyance,wastewater collection and treatment, stormwater management, solid waste collection and disposal, and dry utility ' services in Huntington Beach. Wlli Water Production and Distribution System The Utilities Division of the City Public Works Department oversees and maintains the �r water infrastructure owned by the City. City crews perform routine maintenance and repairs necessary to keep the system operating at peak performance levels. �n k The city's water comes from a combination of groundwater (approximately three-fourths) and imported water resources(approximately one-fourth). The city's main source of water supply is groundwater from the Lower Santa Ana River Groundwater Basin, also known as the Orange County Groundwater Basin. Groundwater is currently pumped from eight active wells operated by the City. Water is stored in four storage and distribution reservoirs,also operated by the City, located throughout Huntington Beach. Providing safe 1 71 water to meet the needs of residents and businesses is one of the primary infrastructure goals for the City, and maintaining adequate, cost-effective,and well-maintained delivery systems is an important part of reaching that goal. Additional information on water resources, including supply and water quality, is located in the Environmental Resources and Conservation Element. Wastewater Collection and Treatment The Utilities Division of the City Public Works Department oversees and maintains the wastewater infrastructure owned by the City.City crews perform routine maintenance and 3 repairs necessary to keep the wastewater collection system operating at peak performance levels. The City owns and maintains most sewer collection pipelines, although many of the ry - pipelines in the Sunset Beach area are owned and maintained by the Sunset Beach Sanitary District(SBSD).The SBSD contracts with the City to convey all sewage collected by the SBSD through City pipelines to the OCSD for treatment. All sewage collected by City pipelines is transported to OCSD collection mains and is then transported to OCSC .: Treatment Plant No. 2 at Brookhurst Street and Pacific Coast Highway. a� Funding upgrades and regular maintenance of the wastewater system are challenges faced by many communities, and the City is dedicated to keeping wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure effective and cost-efficient. Policies and actions in this plan Sl recommend diversification of funding through increased use of development fees and other sources to upgrade and maintain wastewater infrastructure and facilities. ,. 7-6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) p a Stormwater and Urban Runoff Huntington Beach lies within the Lower Santa Ana River Basin under the Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) adopted by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Urban runoff in the city drains into streams, lakes, bays, wetlands, estuaries, Huntington Harbour, and the Pacific Ocean. The runoff is directed by a storm drainage system owned and operated by the City, although several major channels transporting , runoff from areas upstream of the city are owned and maintained b Orange County. M _ p tY Y 9 Y � Runoff originating in Huntington Beach and areas located upstream can contain contaminants, and proper drainage is necessary to prevent flooding. To prevent flooding, the drainage system needs to be properly maintained and upgraded when necessary.As with wastewater collection, achieving this is both a primary challenge and an important goal for the City. " Solid Waste Collection and Disposal 1,111w,4,1 Huntington Beach contracts services for solid waste, recycling, and green waste composting services.Solid waste is taken to a transfer station in Huntington Beach,where it is processed and transported to the Frank Bowerman Landfill in Irvine,which is expected to remain open until 2053. In addition, the City also offers used oil recycling services and household hazardous waste disposal services through the Orange County Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center. California has an adopted policy goal that directs the state to recycle,compost,or source f x 5 reduce 75 percent of all solid waste generated in California by 2020. Increased ; composting of organic materials, which make up approximately one-third of all waste disposed of in the state, is one of five key strategies the state has identified to meet this goal. In particular, there is significant potential for improved composting of residential and IN commercial food waste, which make up approximately 18 percent of all waste generated in California and is the single most common waste material in the state. Beginning in 2016, z communities must develop programs for businesses to begin recycling organic waste, including food waste. Multifamily residences with at least five units must also begin recycling organic waste, although food waste does not have to be included in the multifamily program. While organic composting programs have already been successful s in several communities throughout California, these requirements in support of the 75 percent goal will implement organic recycling programs statewide. l 5 As state regulations for waste diversion increase, Huntington Beach should continue " efforts to maximize recycling, composting, and source reduction to ensure continued compliance. Improving waste collection services to commercial businesses and multi- family housing units and increasing the community's knowledge of waste diversion practices are the primary ways the City plans to eliminate landfill waste. In addition to reaching diversion goals, maintaining the cleanliness of the beach and other common areas, particularly following large public events, is an important future focus. s City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-7 e e Dry Utilities Dry utilities provided in Huntington Beach include electricity, natural gas, internet and cable communications, and both wired and wireless telephone service. Electricity is provided to y. residents and businesses in 3 Huntington Beach through Southern z u. California Edison, and natural gas is provided by Southern California Gas �x Company (SoCal Gas). Southern California Edison provides renewable energy as part of its energy portfolio,with wind and geothermal providing the most energy y� of the renewable sources.The City has also installed 2.13 megawatts of solar panels at City Hall and the Central Library, helping to reduce City costs and providing the City more 3 control over its energy supplies. Internet, cable, and/or communications services are provided by third-party purveyors. Cellular service is available from all major cellular networks.The City is committed to working with utility providers so that the most advanced and effective services are available to all residents and businesses. Infrastructure Finance A] Major infrastructure projects, including construction, expansion, renovation, or replacement of infrastructure,facilities, or equipment, are known as"capital projects."The City funds capital projects using a variety of sources. The largest sources are special tY P P 1 9 tY 9 P °E revenue funds and enterprise funds. Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are derived from entitlement funds, such as the gas tax, or F z developer funds, such as development impact fees. Entitlement funds are distributed based on population, whereas developer funds are used to minimize the impacts a ` development project will have on infrastructure. Special revenue funds include the Air 3r A� Quality Fund, Traffic Impact Fund, Gas Tax Fund, Park Acquisition Fund, Measure M Fund, and Traffic Congestion Relief(Proposition 42 Fund. Enterprise Funds t �13 Enterprise funds are acquired from users paying for the use of a service,such as.water and sewer.These funds support the cost of operations, maintenance, and upgrades to the 5 system and service. Enterprise funds include the Water Fund, the Sewer Service Fund, and the General Fund Capital Improvement Reserve. 7-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) In addition to these two funding types,a variety of grants aid in the cost of developing and 3Y improving infrastructure. Maximizing the use of these types of funding and ensuring that Y �£ development fees are set appropriately relative to the impact a project causes to infrastructure and services are the primary methods the City uses to ensure adequate funding for future capital programs. ' Issues, Goals, and Poll-des INN The public facility and service issues addressed in this element include: • Providing adequate police staffing and facilities • Providing adequate fire, marine safety,and emergency medical services b • Transforming libraries into community cultural centers • Providing social and community services • Meeting existing and future education needs The infrastructure issues addressed in this element include: • Maintaining optimal physical condition of water and sewer infrastructure ;1§1=may , • Supporting storm drain system upgrades and maintenance y • Improving, replacing, and funding infrastructure R • Providing solid waste collection and recycling/disposal3 • Meeting dry utility needs • Financing public services and infrastructure Providing Adequate Police Staffing and Facilities The safety and well-being of Huntington Beach's neighborhoods and businesses is a core component of the community's quality of life. New development and anticipated population growth will change the police response needs of the community, especially given the 3 33 31 anticipated decreases in federal, state,and county funding in the future. Huntington Beach will continue to sustain and improve its commitment to safety through a comprehensive approach to police services,which includes providing adequate facilities and personnel, planning for public safety in the built environment, and public information and community partnerships. i � 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-9 a ., Goal PSI-1. Public safety services, education, facilities. and technology protect the community from illicit activities and crime. Policies „ t A. Consider the relationship between the location and rate of planned growth and resulting demands on police facilities and personnel. B. Achieve optimal utilization of allocated public safety resources and provide desired levels of response and protection within the community. C. Establish proactive time targets and clearance rates that meet or exceed national averages and enhance and maintain police department staffing and facilities to achieve them. f D. Ensure that new development and reuse projects and existing land uses promote P P 1 9 a community safety. E. Consider emergency response needs of police when improving streets and critical intersections. Yin. F. Decrease incidents of criminal activity at high or repetitive crime locations and in conjunction with special events. G. Continue to support community-based crime prevention efforts by neighborhood groups f and civic organizations. '. H. Continue to provide public information about community, neighborhood, household, school, and business safety. I. Research, procure, and use innovative technologies to optimize police services and reduce 3 crime. s Providing Adequate Fire, Marine Safety, and Emergency �. Medical Services The HBFD provides comprehensive fire prevention and suppression services and emergency medical services (EMS) within the community. The fire department also oversees the City's Marine Safety Division, which provides public safety services along city beaches. In addition to fighting fires,the fire department works to prevent and minimize T, death and injury, environmental damage, and property loss by taking steps to prevent fire in the community. The City will need to continue to provide EMS and fire services sufficient to meet anticipated population growth as well as marine safety services to accommodate y increased tourism and visitors to the city's beaches. 7-1Q City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 0 a Goal PSI-2. Huntington Beach residents and propeily owners are protected from fire hazards and beach hazards, and adequate marine safety and emergency medical services are provided by modern facilities and advanced technology. t� Policies A. Consider the relationship between the location and rate of planned growth, the placement of critical facilities,and the resulting demands on fire, marine safety,and EMS facilities and personnel. B. Adopt locally defined performance objectives for emergency response to fire and EMS _ calls, and periodically evaluate fire service and EMS facilities and personnel relative to �f community needs.'' u C. Consider fire-related emergency response needs when improving streets and critical intersections. D. Research, procure, and use modern equipment, advanced technology, and other innovative techniques to optimize fire, marine safety, and EMS services. ""• E. Ensure that new development and reuse projects and existing land uses promote fire safety. , F. Continue to provide adequate marine safety services, and consider additional safety �r measures to address increases in visitors to the city's beach areas and protect citizensL from ocean surf line hazards. G. Ensure development provides adequate access for public safety responders in the event of an emergency. Transforming Libraries into Community Cultural Centers Public libraries are valuable cultural centers that are well used by a variety of community members. Increases in library patronage generated by development may overload they library system's capacity to provide adequate services without appropriate funding x� increases. The City has an opportunity to transform libraries to offer expanded cultural, artistic, and educational activities. Goal PSI-3. Libraries are central community facilities and library services respond F " to changing community needs. Policies ;'" �. A. Adapt libraries to become expanded cultural centers providing public space to meet community needs for after-school programs, job training programs, workshops, and other activities while ensuring they maintain the basic service of providing public access to '1" information, reading, and education resources. B. Consider constructing new libraries and rehabilitating and expanding existing libraries and �EE u �" programs to meet changing community needs. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-11 a a C. Expand library outreach services to the maximum extent feasible for seniors and others P rY a who are physically unable to visit library facilities. 3 t. D. Support technology and facility upgrade efforts in libraries to ensure community members have access to state-of-the-art amenities. f Providing Social and Community Services The expansion of cultural activities and events serves an important role in promoting the efforts of local artists, providing educational opportunities for community youth, and diversifying the activities and amenities available to visitors. With the number of visitors that are drawn to Huntington Beach, the city is poised to be a regional hub for culture and arts. sE , As the general population ages, demand for senior services will increase. Huntington Beach's senior and elderly population would greatly benefit from easily accessible services to meet their needs. Facilities like senior centers,community rooms, and libraries can provide needed services to the elderly. Many of these facilities also support programs ' for youths and families within the community. Goal PSI-4.A broad range of public and private programs meet diverse community needs. including mental health, arts, educational, and cultural programs. t Policies A. Ensure that programs and services meet the needs of a diverse group of users (e.g., f�. " seniors, youths, and special needs populations), and accommodate a range of ages and abilities. f B. Maintain a rich artistic and cultural dimension within the community's identity that supports ,3 cultural tourism initiatives. C. Support social service programs that meet the changing needs of the Huntington Beach community. D. Support the provision of educational and other social services in existing public facilities, such as libraries and community centers. E. Ensure that the senior center is accessible to all residents by supporting a variety of .: transportation options. 01 Meeting Existing and Future Education Needs With declining demand for school facilities, regional school districts have the opportunity and challenge to provide for existing and future demands using the current facilities. The City will continue to support efforts by the districts to provide and expand continuing education, after-school programs, and educational programs for all ages. 7-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Goal PSI-5. A range of educational programs and facilities meets the needs of all 3 ages of the community. Policies 1141"? A. Continue to consult with school districts to maximize existing use of school sites while addressing future community and school district needs. B. Continue to support and expand continuing education, after-school programs, and educational programs for all ages including educational opportunities offered in �z neighboring universities and colleges. C. Continue to work with school districts for shared use of school district park spaces for public recreational activities and the use of City parks to support school education purposes. , D. Ensure that developers consult with the appropriate school district with the intent to mitigate z:R a potential impact on school facilities prior to project approval by the City. Maintaining Optimal Physical Condition of Water and Sewer Infrastructure Water and sewer infrastructure is managed through the use of separate enterprise funds. As the water and sewer systems continue to age, deterioration will occur. Water system infrastructure is much more costly to construct and maintain than the sewer system.Water y� Master Plan (WMP) updates are performed typically every five years,with the last update F ` adopted in 2016. The Sewer Master Plan study was last performed in 2003 and will be updated as needed to identify new major improvements to maintain and replace aging sewer infrastructure. Goal PSI-6. The costs of water and sewer infrastructure improvements are ;s addressed by benefitting development projects. Policies 5Y A. Provide and maintain wastewater collection facilities which adequately convey wastewater generated by existing land uses and future projects while maximizing cost efficiency. B. Ensure that the costs of water and wastewater infrastructure improvements are bome by those who benefit, through adequate fees and charges or the construction of 0101, improvements. C. Explore additional funding sources to support necessary maintenance, expansion, and upgrades to the water and sewer systems. f t City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-13 t� Supporting Storm Drain System Upgrades and Maintenance With anticipated growth, the City must assess the efficacy of the storm drain system.The existing system relies on pump stations, catch basins,and pipelines, in tandem with flood control channel improvements that should be evaluated and improved. The Storm Drain Master Plan identifies deficiencies within the system. New storm drain infrastructure will be required to reduce flooding and accommodate expected growth. Funding for this infrastructure comes from a variety of sources including impact fees, grants, and the General Fund; however, available funding is not adequate for all anticipated P.: improvements. Additional funding is necessary to construct and maintain adequate drainage facilities. Goal PSI-7. The flood control system supports permitted land uses while preserving public safety,f. Policies A. Ensure that adequate storm drain and flood control facilities are provided and properly maintained. ,� B. Maintain, upgrade, and expand flood control facilities and coordinate with the County to improve County storm drain and flood control facilities within the city. C. Monitor demands and manage future development and reuse projects and existing land uses to mitigate impacts and/or facilitate improvements to the storm drainage system. D. Ensure that the costs of infrastructure improvements to the storm drain system are borne 10 , by those who benefit, through adequate fees. E. Control surface runoff water discharge into the stormwater conveyance system to comply with the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit and other regional permits issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. F. Explore additional funding sources to support necessary maintenance, expansion, and upgrades to the storm drain system. Improving, Replacing, and Funding Infrastructure As health and safety standards evolve, infrastructure system designs and operations must also remain current and relevant. Much of the sewer,water, and roadway infrastructure in mn Huntington Beach is aging and will require improvements or replacement over time. As population increases and federal, state,and county funding becomes uncertain, the ability 5 , to provide adequate facilities and services may be diminished. Much of the future growth in the community is planned for arterial corridors, including Beach Boulevard, Edinger .. ` Avenue, Gothard Street, and portions of Pacific Coast Highway. Future street, sewer, and 7-14 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) a RR water infrastructure will need to accommodate additional residents and businesses along " these corridors, as in the northwest industrial area. The City should continue to explore creative and alternative means to fund the repair and expansion of public facilities and services. Goal PSI-8. Coordinated infrastructure improvements are identified and funded. ' Policies A. Prepare and adopt coordinated, citywide infrastructure master plans to establish priority and identify funding options for future capital improvement projects. µ , B. Ensure that individual infrastructure maintenance and improvement projects are consistent with infrastructure master plans when infrastructure crosses multiple jurisdictions, and are completed in an efficient and cost-effective manner. C. Assess,and, if necessary, adjust development impact fees to ensure they are coordinated with infrastructure management plans and provide for ongoing and future infrastructure ', ...' ' needs in an equitable manner. Providing Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Solid waste collection services provide several benefits to residents and businesses, including waste pickup, recycling services,green waste composting, a public dumpsite, and a compressed natural gas fueling station. Although waste generation in Huntington Beach is consistently below per capita standards established by the state, the many regional and national events and activities occurring in the city create a particular waste challenge. Trash is often left behind after these events,degrading visitors'and residents' beach experiences. f � Goal PSI-9.An adequate and orderly system for solid waste collection and disposal meets the demands of new development and reuse projects,existing land uses. and ` special events. Policies A. Ensure that new development and reuse projects provide adequate space for recycling and organics collection activities to support state waste reduction goals. B. Continue to exceed state solid waste reduction goals and work toward making Huntington Beach a zero-waste community. C. Maintain adequate solid waste collection, recycling, and disposal services to reduce J' traditional commercial, industrial, and residential waste. ': City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-15 n � e D. Improve solid waste collection and recycling services associated with special events and the availability of trash and recycling receptacles in public areas, including but not limited 3' to Downtown, Beach Boulevard, City parks, and along the beach. E. Continue to expand household recycling services and provide public information regarding �T how community members can dispose of or recycle materials correctly. F. Reduce the amount of waste disposed per employee in the business community by u! improving commercial recycling services and providing information to support waste reduction. G. Expand the types of waste that can be recycled or otherwise diverted from the community waste stream, including organic materials in compliance with state law. RN H. Continue to provide public information regarding residential collection of household hazardous wastes including paint containers, electronics, household chemicals, motor oils, and pesticides, and promote development of facilities that collect these materials. Meeting Dry Uti I ity Needs Dry utility services, such as electricity, natural gas, telephone, and data services, both meet basic needs and enhance quality of life for Huntington Beach residents. Supporting or providing enhanced data services in industrial and employment/technology areas is Aki also an important economic development strategy. These services are provided by independent entities that set their own service standards and facility improvement strategies. The City works with service providers to ensure that goals and service y expectations are met for both current and future development. ,? GoalPSI-10. Superior electricity, natural gas. telephone. and data services improve quality of life and support economic development. N Policies A. Continue to consult with dry utility service providers to ensure that the community's current and future needs are met. B. Continue to require utilities to be placed underground as part of new development projects. C. Support the use of new and emerging communication technologies. D. Promote provision of high-capacity data systems to support new development and reuse projects, particularly within the Research and Technology land use designation. E. Encourage integrated and cost-effective design and technology features within new 3' development and reuse projects to minimize demands on dry utility networks. v- F. Create and maintain a"dig once" policy. 7-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 0 0 Financing Public Services and Infrastructures , , Given the loss of redevelopment agency powers and the limited financing sources available for public infrastructure, it is important that the City manage and expand existing financial resources and explore the availability of new financing legislation and programs. '' The fiscal balance of the City is important to continue to maintain a high quality of public 1 y services and provide new programs as the need arises. Goal PSI-11. The City's Financial resources are managed and expanded to support , infrastructure maintenance and expansion. 4 NO Policies i A. Prepare a capital improvement program that identifies priorities for the expenditure of "'ry public capital resources in combination with private financing sources. B. Ensure that development impact fees keep pace with the cost of new infrastructure, and a that new development pays its fair share. , C. Consider a wide range of additional financing approaches, such as assessments, special r taxes,and innovative techniques to improve and expand infrastructure systems. SNJ x?o o WM s � r �s 3° �l ? w 3 t r� r"a City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 7-17 Q This page is intentionally left blank. IS'& n k y, r•a E 2 } 3 pp/ i 4 0 3 Nl/j% 7-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) VIR implementation Introduction E This Implementation Plan will guide Huntington Beach elected and appointed officials,City staff, and members of the public in putting the goals and policies in the General Plan into effect. The Implementation Plan helps ensure that the General Plan leads to meaningful and applied actions. Each implementation program is an item that requires City action, either alone or in collaboration with non-City organizations, including private businesses, nonprofit organizations, and federal/state/regional agencies. These implementation programs may be modifications to existing City processes or procedures, such as the review of new development projects. Other implementation programs can include physical changes to the city(such as new infrastructure), new types of work for City officials and staff,and new planning efforts. Depending on the type of implementation program, a funding source may have to be identified and secured before the program can be put into effect. � 1 F City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-1 Implementation Programs The implementation programs are organized by General Plan element. Within the section for each element, the implementation programs are organized into the following subsections based on the type of program and the nature of the City's responsibility. Not all element sections will have implementation programs for each of these subsections. I. City Plans, Ordinances,and Programs Il. Capital Improvements III. Development Review Requirements IV. Interjurisdictional Coordination V. Public Outreach and Information Each implementation program is directly linked to one or more of the General Plan policies. For each implementation program, this chapter also identifies the responsible City departments or agencies,the potential funding source or sources,and the recommended time frame. These implementation programs may be used as the basis to prepare the Annual Report to the City Council on implementation of the General Plan, as required by the California Government Code. Many of these implementation programs may also serve as mitigation actions for the environmental impacts of the goals and policies in the General Plan, as identified by the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. As a result, the Annual Report can also help the City monitor implementation of the environmental mitigation actions, as required by the California Public Resources Code. In order to ensure that the implementation programs remain useful and consistent with City policy, they should be reviewed and updated as needed at appropriate times. The programs should be assessed concurrently with the annual Huntington Beach budget process, and whenever the General Plan is amended or updated. The programs developed as part of the General Plan are organized by their corresponding element on the following pages. 8-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) land Use Flement City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs LU-P.1. Related Programs and Governmental Agencies Continue to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local programs and regulations, including but not limited to the following: • California Coastal Act and Local Coastal Program • Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy • Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission • Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance • Huntington Beach Municipal Code Departments: Community Development, Public Works,Police, Fire Related Policies: LU-1.A, LU-1.B. Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.2. Surf City Culture and Identity Continue to ensure that all new development and reuse projects in the city are designed in a manner that preserves the Surf City culture and identity. Encourage project applicants to emphasize the Surf City culture and identity through building orientation and design, landscaping, and other visual features. Provide specific guidelines and resources for how to incorporate the Surf City culture and identity into proposed developments. The Surf City theme should be emphasized in development projects throughout the city, not only in visitor-serving areas. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: LU-2.A, LU-2.B, LU-2.C, LU-2.D, LU-2.E, Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.3. Downtown Preservation Continue to maintain the character, function, and visual feel of Downtown as the central commercial, entertainment, and recreational district in Huntington Beach. Allow for new development in Downtown that supports the area's characteristics and purpose.All design standards applied in Downtown, including building and architectural design guidelines, City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-3 street furniture standards,landscaping requirements, and sign standards,shall emphasize the character of Downtown and reinforce Downtown as distinct from the rest of the city. The Downtown area shall continue to emphasize pedestrian and bicycle-oriented transportation. Ensure that Downtown continues to meet the needs and expectations of residents, local businesses,and visitors. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development, Public Works, Police, Fire Related Policies: LU-8.A, LU-8.13, LU-8.C, LU-8.D Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.4. Residential Compatibility Protect existing residential neighborhoods from increased development or redevelopment on surrounding parcels that may prove incompatible with residential uses, including development or redevelopment that generates substantial traffic volumes, produces noise or unpleasant odors, or involves the use of hazardous materials. Identify opportunities to convert existing land uses near residential neighborhoods that are incompatible with the neighborhood to more suitable uses. Ensure that all new homes in existing residential neighborhoods are compatible with surrounding structures, while still allowing for variations in appearance to maintain an interesting visual character. Departments: Community Development, Police Related Policies: LU-4.D,LU-7.A, LU-7.13, Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.5. Protection for Unique Areas Ensure that the unique neighborhoods, corridors, and land use subareas within the planning area maintain their distinct character and visual appearance. All standards for building design, streetscape design, and landscaping in these areas should be consistent with the area's look and feel. Work closely with residents and business owners in these areas to ensure that new development proposals are consistent with the character and visual appearance of the neighborhood, corridor, or subarea. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: LU-2.C, LU-2.E, LU-7.C, LU-7.D, LU-7.E, LU-7.F Funding Source: General Fund, development fees, Business Improvement District funding ' Time Frame: Ongoing 8-4 ,,; City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) LU-P.6.Visual Identity Develop and enforce standards to establish and maintain a unique visual identity in different portions of the planning area. Consider building designs and architectural treatments, street furniture, edge and entry treatments, street trees, planters and landscaping features, signs and wayfinding features, and other visual elements. Design elements should be consistent throughout the area and not create visual clutter. Work to avoid new development and visual elements that conflict with these standards. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: LU-2.C, LU-2.E, LU-1.A, LU-7, B Funding Source: General Fund, development fees, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.7. Infill and Redevelopment Encourage reinvestment and redevelopment on vacant and underutilized parcels, particularly along key corridors and in key subareas. Work with property owners and neighbors to identify the most appropriate uses for these parcels. If neighborhoods lack specific important services or features, encourage vacant and underutilized parcels to be developed to provide these services or features. Maintain a database of vacant and underutilized parcels. Departments: Planning Division,Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-1.C, LU-12.B Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement Districtfunding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.8. Mixed-Use Development Promote mixed-use development that combines residential and commercial uses such as retail and office space. Mixed-use development should be concentrated along major corridors and in suitable neighborhoods such as Downtown. Ensure that mixed-use areas are easily accessible by multiple modes of transportation, including walking, bicycling,and public transit. Provide a wide range of residential units at different sizes and prices to make mixed-use developments a viable option for a diverse range of community members. Commercial uses in mixed-use areas should provide jobs to residents of the areas as well as attracting customers from other locations in the planning area and from surrounding communities. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development, Public Works Related Policies: LU-4.A, LU-4.13, LU-8.A, LU-8.B Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing ' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-5 LU-P.9.Accessibility of New Development Focus new development, particularly larger developments with a high number of residents, employees, customers, and/or visitors, in areas that are easily accessible by alternative modes of transportation, including walking, bicycling,and transit use.Work with applicants to include project improvements that support alternative transportation. Consider the ease of reaching other destinations from the proposed development using alternative transportation, and identify opportunities to improve local and regional transportation networks. Coordinate with the Orange County Transportation Authority to ensure consistency between proposed land uses and changes to transit operations. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: LU-3.6, LU-4.13, LU-13.D, CIRC-3.D,CIRC-6.0 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.10.Affordable Housing Ensure that Huntington Beach has a sufficient supply of housing for individuals and families of all incomes, including extremely low- and very low-income residents. Meet or exceed the target number of affordable units specified in the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation. Integrate affordable housing into mixed-use projects and market-rate residential developments. Locate affordable housing near high-quality jobs, and ensure that affordable housing sites have sufficient access to alternative modes of transportation. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-4.A, LU-4.6, LU-4.E, LU-14.0 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.11. Industrial Expansion and Redevelopment Attract new businesses to the city's industrial areas, and encourage existing businesses to expand. Work with property owners in industrial areas to ensure that buildings provide the amenities necessary to attract and retain high-value tenants. Amend zoning and development codes to remove regulatory barriers that may prevent businesses in new and emerging fields from locating in Huntington Beach. Identify opportunities to allow businesses that support industrial uses and provide services to employees to locate in or near industrial areas. Ensure that new and expanded businesses do not create conflicts with surrounding land uses and community character,and work with businesses to reduce w,f existing conflicts. Require preparation of a health risk assessment for new uses located in x the Industrial and Research and Technology designations that potentially generate diesel particulate matter emissions and potential toxic air contaminant (TAC) emitters located 8-6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive uses, and use recommendations outlined in the health risk assessment to determine siting limitations and mitigation approaches. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-5.A, LU-5.13, LU-5.C, LU-5.D, LU-5.E Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement Districtfunding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.12. Technology and Innovation Subareas Recruit and incentivize new business uses in the Northwest Industrial and Gothard Street Subareas suitable for light industrial and manufacturing activities, with an emphasis on high-tech businesses, research and development, small-scale advanced manufacturing, and similar land uses,as well as supportive uses that provide basic services to employees. Buildings in these subareas should be flexible enough to support a variety of potential tenants and provide the amenities sufficient to attract and retain desired types of businesses, including necessary energy and communication infrastructure. Ensure that Technology and Innovation Subareas are easily accessible by multiple modes of transportation, including walking and biking. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-9.A, LU-9.13, LU-9.C, LU-9.D Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement Districtfunding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.13. Intersection Enhancement Subareas Develop a City-defined landscape program for major intersections in the Intersection Enhancement Subareas to unify the landscaping between individual developments and further enhance the aesthetic appeal of the areas. Develop design guidelines that define appropriate colors, materials, signage, and architectural treatments for commercial developments located at major intersections to enable developments to become more unified as new uses are established and properties are updated over time. Work with individual property owners to create additional pedestrian connections and modify the circulation patterns in parking areas to create pathways for pedestrians to access the site and internal uses.Identify and remove existing curb cuts that no longer meet current safety requirements, and work with property owners to develop new circulation patterns within sites affected by this activity. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works,Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-7.D, LU-.E, LU-7.F Funding Source: General Fund 4 Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-7 LU-P.14. Housing for Industrial and Research/Technology Employees Consider allowing housing near Industrial and Research/Technology areas to create convenient residences for employees in these land uses. Ensure that any housing in or near these areas does not conflict with Industrial or Research/Technology activities, and is not exposed to any potential undesirable impacts that may be generated by these land uses. Avoid building housing on land that is more suitable for nonresidential land uses within the Industrial or Research/Technology zones. Consider opportunities to locate housing above nonresidential buildings. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-4.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.16. Commercial Revitalization Identify and improve struggling commercial areas within the planning area. Work with property owners and local business groups to select and implement revitalization strategies, including renovations to the building stock, changes to the streetscape and landscaping, and improved access for multiple modes of transportation. Determine which types of land uses are most suitable for the area, including the potential to build residential units above commercial properties. Use existing assets such as historic buildings, and consider how older buildings may be renovated to support new land uses. Pursue all available sources of funding to provide economic assistance to businesses in revitalized areas. Departments: Planning Division,Office of Business Development, Public Works Related Policies: LU-12.A,LU-12.B, LU-13.0 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.16. Business Improvement Districts In coordination with business groups, establish Business Improvement Districts or other economic development strategies to generate funding for area improvements that will result in increased customers and economic activity. Coordinate improvements funded through Business Improvement Districts to ensure that all businesses are benefiting. Identify opportunities to use Business Improvement Districts for improvements that result in long-term improved economic sustainability, including resource conservation programs and hazard resiliency. Departments: City Manager's Office, Office of Business Development � 7 Related Policies: LU-12.D �`. Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing 8-8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) LU-P.17. Residential Property Maintenance Provide residential property owners with resources to support preserving a high quality of housing, including available economic incentives, financing programs, and assistance in obtaining the necessary City permits. These items should allow residential property owners to maintain safe, healthy, and comfortable living environments, as well as provide opportunities for improvements such as energy efficiency retrofits. Ensure that support and incentives are also made available to residential landlords to maintain and improve the quality of rental stock,while maintaining affordability. Department: Building Division, Code Enforcement Division, Office of Business Development, Police, Fire Related Policies: LU-4.0 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.18. Economic Development Assistance Maintain existing economic development programs, and identify and implement opportunities to expand and improve these programs. Through economic development assistance, emphasize businesses that provide for unmet or undermet needs in Huntington Beach, provide high-quality jobs, support new and emerging industries, or provide economic opportunities to historically underrepresented persons such as ethnic minorities, women, or disabled individuals. Coordinate with local business groups and academic institutions to improve these programs and expand their reach. Monitor and report on the effectiveness of economic development assistance programs, and revise , programs as needed to improve success. Department:Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-10.A, LU-10.D, LU-11.0 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.19. Local and Diverse Economy = Encourage the establishment and expansion of businesses which provide an increase in job type diversity and support a healthy jobs-housing balance in the planning area. Emphasize jobs for people with a wide variety of education backgrounds, skills, and passions. Work to ensure that jobs provide a sufficient wage, allowing employees to live near their workplace,and that such jobs include opportunities for advancement. Departments: Planning Division,Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-11.13, LU-13.A, LU-13.13 �- Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-9 LU-P.20. Commercial Diversity Work with the local business community to ensure that retail and other commercial facilities in Huntington Beach meet resident needs by providing desired types of goods and services at reasonable prices. Consider the varying commercial needs of residents, including lower-income individuals, minority groups, and non-traditional families. Identify opportunities to meet commercial demand from surrounding communities and to attract customers from a wider region. Encourage businesses to fill unmet commercial demand through economic incentives and favorable development policies. Departments: Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-11.A, LU-11.B, LU-11.0 Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement Districtfunding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.21. Retail Sales Monitorina Track all taxable retail sales in Huntington Beach, and publicize this information regularly to City officials, members of the public, and the local business community. Use this information to determine the amount of retail leakage (consumers purchasing items from retailers outside of the city)for key categories. Work with business groups to determine the causes of retail leakage, including why consumers may favor a store in another community, and if there is residual demand for retail goods that are not met within Huntington Beach. Identify strategies to address the causes of retail leakage. Departments: City Treasury,Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-11.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.22. Closure of Surplus School Sites In the event of the closure of a surplus school site, work with school districts to develop and implement alternative uses for the property. Consistent with state law, explore with the school districts alternative uses for the site that serve a public benefit, including other education facilities, community centers, recreation facilities, and open space,although all uses should be considered. Departments: Community Services, Planning Division, City Manager's Office, Office of Business Development ttom�, Related Policies: LU-6.A, LU-6.B, LU-6.0 C Funding Source: General Fund 3a.. Time Frame: Ongoing 8-10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) LU-P.23. Overnight Accommodations Encourage additional expansion of overnight accommodations in Huntington Beach, consisting of both new businesses and expansion and renovation of existing properties. Identify suitable locations for new and expanded accommodations, and work with property owners and business groups to consider whether lodging on these properties is feasible. Support the inclusion of smaller lodging uses as part of mixed-use developments. Ensure that the supply of lodging in Huntington Beach meets the needs of different types of visitors, including vacationing families, single adults and couples,and business travelers. Support a range of different lodging options at various price points. Explore the feasibility of short-term vacation rentals. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-14.A Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement Districtfunding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.24. Shuttle Services Explore creating a free or low-cost shuttle service connecting the shore and Downtown to major shopping districts, hotels, and other visitor destinations. The shuttle should have sufficient hours of operation and arrive frequently enough to offer a viable alternative to car travel. As funding allows, adjust the operating schedule to support employee commutes to visitor destinations. The shuttle service and supportive infrastructure(such as stops) should be comfortable, safe, visually engaging, and marketed with unique branding. Departments: Office of Business Development, Public Works Related Policies: LU-12.C, LU-13.D Funding Source: General Fund, development fees, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Consider feasibility by 2020 Capital Improvements LU-P.25. Pedestrian Networks Maintain a high degree of pedestrian connectivity between new development and other parts of the planning area through an extensive, high-quality trail and sidewalk network. Trails and sidewalks should be safe, attractive, and comfortable to use. The pedestrian network should connect to major destinations and reach throughout Huntington Beach, __f making it convenient for residents and visitors throughout the planning area. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-11 Department: Public Works Related Policies: LU-3.13, LU-7.D, LU-8.A, LU-12.0 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees, Business Improvement District funding, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.26. Bicycle Infrastructure Continue to install new bicycle lanes throughout the planning area to connect all parts of Huntington Beach. Emphasize connections to major destinations, including the shore, Downtown, commercial hubs, and major residential and employment centers. Promote dedicated bike lanes as opposed to shared traffic lanes, and identify opportunities to install grade-separated (Class 1) bike trails and innovative bike paths such as counterflow bike trails, bike boulevards, and raised bike lanes. Install supportive infrastructure such as bicycle racks and lockers along with new bike lanes. Coordinate with bicycle rider groups to identify opportunities for improvement. Department: Public Works, Fire Related Policies: LU-3.13, LU-8.A, LU-13.D, CIRC-6.A,CIRC-6.0 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees, Business Improvement District funding, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing Development Review Requirements LU-P.27. Land Use and Urban Design Standards Continue to require all development to be consistent with the standards in the Land Use Map, Urban Design Plan, other components of the General Plan, Urban Design Guidelines, and other City policies. Development shall comply with all standards for land use,density and intensity, environmental protection, open space,and other requirements. Periodically review and update Urban Design Guidelines to guide new development in the city.Clearly communicate all requirements to project applicants throughout the application and review process, and ensure that City staff and officials have sufficient authority to enforce standards. Departments: Planning Division Related Policies: LU-1.A, LU-3.A Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing J 8-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) LU-P.28. Site Design and Quality Ensure that all new and renovated/expanded buildings in Huntington Beach continue to meet the community's high standards for architectural design, site planning, and construction and operation. Enforce minimum standards for resource conservation, including green building requirements,water conservation,and stormwater management, and encourage project applicants to exceed minimum requirements. Avoid projects that are visually unappealing or incompatible with community character. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: LU-1.D Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.29. Commercial Building Maintenance Continue to maintain a high degree of safety for all commercial buildings, including retail spaces, offices, restaurants, entertainment venues, and lodging. Property owners and operators shall continue to comply with all mandatory maintenance requirements and other standards.Promptly investigate all reports of unsafe conditions, and require property owners and operators to conduct maintenance and make other improvements as needed. Hold owners and operators who fail to maintain high safety standards accountable through all available legal mechanisms. Work with local business groups to provide outreach, resources, and financial assistance to support compliance with maintenance and safety standards. Departments: Fire, Building Division, Code Enforcement, Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-12.B Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.30. Development Agreements Where appropriate, use development agreements as binding implementation tools. Development agreements are authorized by state law to enable a city to enter into a binding contract with a developer that assures the city as to the type,character,and quality of development and additional benefits that may be contributed and assures the developer that the necessary development permits will be issued regardless of changes in regulations. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: LU-2.A, LU-8.0 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-13 Interjurisdictional Coordination LU-P.31. Marketing and Visibility In coordination with regional and statewide efforts, market Huntington Beach to increase visibility and support population growth, business development, and tourism. Seek to appeal to a wide audience in terms of geographic location, socioeconomic demographics, and business type. Monitor the effectiveness of a marketing campaign and make adjustments as needed, including emphasizing new destinations and opportunities in Huntington Beach. Involve community residents and local business groups in developing marketing materials. Departments: City Manager's Office,Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-11.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.32.Workforce Coordination Work with federal, state, and regional agencies to develop and support programs that encourage increased workforce training and hiring. Ensure that such programs support industries currently present in Huntington Beach as well as new and emerging industries that are suitable for the community, including software development, sustainability- focused industries, and small-scale manufacturing. Workforce programs should provide opportunities for high-paying jobs with career growth to people with a range of skill sets and education. Coordinate with local education institutions and workforce training agencies. Publicize available workforce training programs through in-person workshops and events, print media, radio, television, and online/social media, and ensure materials are made available in multiple languages. Department:Office of Business Development Related Policies: LU-10.0 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing E aft: #.A 8-14 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Off CRIallon Element City Ins, Ordinances, and Programs CIRC-P.1.Related Programs and Governmental Agencies Continue to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local programs and regulations, including but not limited to the following: • Sustainable Communities Act • Measure M • Orange County Congestion Management Program Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-1.E,CIRC-5.6 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.2.Development Monitoring Review an annual summary of development in recent years to determine immediate and cumulative impacts of proposed developments on the city's transportation system. Departments: Planning Division,Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-1.6 Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Annually CIRC-P.3.Emergency Response Times Monitor and analyze emergency response time information to determine locations where response times are deficient, and evaluate and implement system improvements needed to improve responsewhen possible. Departments: Public Works, Fire, Police Related Policy: CIRC-9.A Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Annually r City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-15 CIRC-P.4. Emergency Access Provide approved means for emergency vehicles to access and turn around on all streets. Departments: Public Works, Planning Division, Fire, Police Related Policy: CIRC-9.13 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.5. Emergency Management and Homeland Security Program Implement the City's Emergency Management and Homeland Security (EMHS)Program according to requirements and provisions of the State Emergency Management System (SEMS). Ensure that the program establishes community evacuation routes and emergency shelter facilities, and is easily available to the public. Departments: Fire, Police, Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-9.A, CIRC-9.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.6.Neighborhood Circulation Improvements Prepare and maintain a Neighborhood Traffic Management Technical Administrative Report(TAR)that identifies needed methods to address cut-through traffic volumes, high speeds, truck traffic intrusions, demonstrated accident history, parking shortages, or school-related traffic congestion in city neighborhoods such as: • Discouraging creation of new major roadway connections that would adversely impact the character of existing residential neighborhoods. • Continuing to develop and implement parking and traffic control plans for neighborhoods that are adversely impacted by spill-over parking and traffic, as feasible. • Implementing the Residential Parking Permit Program (Municipal Code Chapter 10.42) in residential areas as prescribed in the Municipal Code. • Considering appropriate traffic-calming measures such as raised medians and provision of bike or transit lanes to mitigate problems posed by schools and other land uses that generate high traffic volumes at specific times. Provide solutions to mitigate these problems as warranted by local studies. Department: Public Works, Fire Related policies: CIRC-1.H Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Report completed by 2020, revised annually 8-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) CIRC-P.7.Bikeway Plan Implement and update Huntington Beach's Bikeway Plan to plan and prioritize facilities for both recreational cyclists and commuters, including: • Reviewing neighboring jurisdictions' bikeway plans every five years to ensure consistency. • Linking bicycle routes with bus routes to promote an interconnected system. • Evaluating potential for a future bicycle parking structure in or near Downtown. • Ensuring compliance with ADA accessibility standards. Department: Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-5.13, CIRC-6.A, CIRC-6.13, CIRC-6.C, CIRC-6.D, CIRC-6.E, CIRC-6.F Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Plan update every five years,implementation ongoing CIRC-P.8.Transportation Demand Management Ordinance Create and implement programs that will aid in improving air quality by reducing motor vehicle trips, such as those programs recommended by the SCAQMD, required by the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance (Zoning Code Title 23, Chapter 230, Section 230.36), or funded by the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Ordinance vehicle fee allocation. The TDM ordinance requires employers of 100 or more persons to support alternative forms of transportation by providing appropriate facilities, including showers and lockers, parking for vanpools, bicycle parking,and passenger loading areas. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-5.A Funding Source: General Fund, grant funds Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.9.Scenic Corridors Continue to maintain scenic corridors and seek grant funding to support their maintenance. Prepare and maintain a Scenic Corridors TAR describing proposed improvements such as landscaped medians and enhanced landscaping. Departments: Public Works, Planning Division,Community Services Related Policies: CIRC-7.A,CIRC-7.6, CIRC-7.C, CIRC-7.E,CIRC-7.F Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Scenic Corridors Technical Administrative Report completed by 2020, ongoing i City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-17 CIRC-P.10.Waterborne Transportation Continue to support the maintenance of existing waterways and encourage private development of waterborne transportation for recreation or commuting. Departments: Planning Division,Community Services, Public Works Related Policy: CIRC-6.1 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Capital Improvements CIRC-P.11.Capital Improvement Program Use the City's 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)process to prioritize, fund, and build required roadway and bikeway improvements, and to address phasing and construction of traffic infrastructure throughout the city. To prioritize these improvements, the City's TARs will be reviewed and updated regularly with current citywide traffic counts for roadway links and intersections. Roadways and intersections that are approaching the LOS standards stated in Policy CIRC-1.13 should be prioritized appropriately for improvements including road widening, paving, parking restrictions,or intersection improvements. Departments: Public Works,City Council, Community Development Related Policies: CIRC-1.A,CIRC-1.13,CIRC-1.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.12.Principal and Secondary Intersection Improvements Prepare and maintain a Principal and Secondary Intersections TAR that will include information such as roadway dimensions, a listing of intersections and roadway improvements required to transition from the current system of roadways to full implementation of the Arterial Highway Plan, current citywide traffic counts for roadway links and intersections, and other useful traffic-related information. Content included will be based on need, as determined by the Director of Public Works. Updates to the TAR will be coordinated annually in tandem with the Capital Improvement Program. The TAR will be available for use by City staff and decision-makers, and should be available for review by the public. Include TAR information in the City's GIS system as appropriate and feasible. Departments: Public Works,City Council, Police, Fire Related Policies: CIRC-1.C,CIRC-1.D Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Annually 8-18 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) CIRC-P.13.Traffic Technology Use appropriate technologies to improve traffic flow and reduce and manage congestion, such as: • Intelligent transportation system(ITS)measures to reduce congestion at intersections, as applicable. • Synchronizing traffic signals along primary and secondary arterials, particularly along streets with clustered intersections. • Installing and maintaining preemptive emergency signaling devices for each direction at appropriate traffic signal-controlled intersections in the city. • Developing a citywide traffic management center. Department: Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-1-I,CIRC-35,CIRC-9.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.14.Transit Encourage and support development of convenient and attractive transit facilities in addition to the Golden West Transportation Center. Support efforts to make both new and existing facilities available and accessible to the disabled and seniors. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Working with: Orange County Transportation Authority Related Policies: CIRC-3.D, CIRC-3.E, CIRC-31,CIRC-4.C,CIRC-4.D,CIRC-4.E, PSI- 4.E Funding Source: General Fund, grant funds, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.15.Complete Streets Priority Routes Identify priority routes for certain modes of transportation as appropriate to guide the development of streets that are safe and accessible to all users. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-5.13,CIRC-6.A,CIRC-6.13,CIRC-6.11 Funding Source: General Fund i" Time Frame: Identify routes by 2020 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-19 CIRC-P.16.Pedestrian Facilities and Enhancement Zones Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide accessible pedestrian walkways between developments, schools, and public facilities. Review potential areas in or near Downtown, adjacent to the beach, and along portions of Beach Boulevard for designation as pedestrian enhancement zones. Prepare and maintain a Pedestrian Facilities TAR and other pedestrian facility related analyses describing the location and proposed improvements in enhancement zones. Such improvements may include wider sidewalks,enhanced or new crosswalks,trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, or traffic-calming measures.All improvements shall comply with ADA accessibility standards. Exact improvements will vary depending on location. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Working With: School districts Related Policies: CIRC-5.B, CIRC-5.D, CIRC-5.E, CIRC-6.A, CIRC-63, CIRC-6.C, CIRC-6.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Prepare Pedestrian Facilities Technical Administrative Report by 2020, ongoing implementation CIRC-P.17. Equestrian Facilities Continue to ensure that trails and other equestrian facilities are maintained by the responsible party and expanded as opportunities arise. Departments: Community Services, Public Works Related Policy: CIRC-6.H Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Development Review Requirements CIRC-P.18.Site Development Permit Process and CEQA Utilize the site development permit process and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)to: • Review potential impacts of proposed projects to the circulation system and require appropriate mitigation measures as required by CEQA. Require preparation of traffic impact studies as described in the City's traffic study guidelines. Require new development proposals to consider and minimize vehicle miles traveled. 8-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) • Review new development proposals to mitigate the impacts of traffic generation, including pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular conflicts, to ensure that the City's circulation system meets appropriate safety standards. • Review driveways in proposed developments to ensure they are located in such a way as to facilitate smooth, efficient, and controlled traffic flow. • Review new development and redevelopment proposals for mitigation of potential impacts of transportation-related sources of water pollution, particularly in urban runoff. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: CIRCA.F,CIRC-2.C, CIRC-3.D, CIRC-6.C,CIRC-7.E Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.19.Access Control Locate new developments and their access points in such a way that vehicular traffic is not encouraged to use local residential streets. Require,where appropriate, an irrevocable offer of mutual access across adjacent nonresidential properties fronting arterial roadways and require use of shared driveway access. Minimize driveway access points, require driveways to be wide enough to accommodate traffic from and to arterial roadways, and establish mechanisms to consolidate driveways where appropriate. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-1.G,CIRC-1.11 Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.20.Alternative Transportation Mode Design Features Require new development to incorporate transit-oriented design features and attractive, accessible, and appropriate transit, bicycle, equestrian, and pedestrian amenities to promote and support public transit and alternate modes of transportation, including but not limited to: • Requiring bus turn-outs and shaded bus stops where appropriate. • Requiring new development to provide convenient and well-lit pedestrian facilities consistent with applicable standards. • Requiring that all new bicycle trip destinations, including schools,shopping areas, and transit stops, be equipped with bicycle racks and/or bicycle lockers. • Continuing to allow equestrian access to the beach. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-21 • Encouraging developments to incorporate easements and/or rights-of-way along flood control channels, public utilities, railroads, and streets for the use of bicyclists and/or pedestrians. • When possible, designing bicycle lanes and sidewalks with barriers to partially or fully separate active transportation users from vehicle traffic. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-3.D,CIRC-3.E,CIRC-6.C, CIRC-6.G,CIRC-6.1-1 Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.21.Transportation Demand Management and Air Quality Require new employers to comply with the City's TDM ordinance and the Environmental Resources and Conservation Element of the General Plan. Department:Planning Division Related Policies: CIRC-5.A,CIRC-6.0 Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.22.Scenic Corridor Development Review Through the development review process for proposed development along scenic corridors: • Require analysis evaluating the impacts on public views to the ocean. • Require developments adjacent to designated scenic and landscape corridors to incorporate and maintain landscaping that is compatible with the visual character of the corridor and supporting scenic features. • Utilize the City's Design Review Board to evaluate developments within designated scenic corridors. • Require that open space easements be dedicated to the City, master homeowners association, or other responsible party as a condition of the approval for all new projects proposed in natural open space areas along scenic corridors. Department:Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-7.B, CIRC-7.C, CIRC-7.D, CIRC-7.E,CIRC-75 Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing 8-22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) CIRC-P.23.Pacific Coast Highway Billboards Continue to pursue the removal of and prohibit new billboards along Pacific Coast Highway. Continue to remedy problems or hindrances which prohibit Pacific Coast Highway from qualifying as a State Scenic Highway. Department:Planning Division Related Policies: CIRC-7.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.24.Helistops/H ell ports and Building Height Restrictions Ensure that each applicant seeking approval for the construction of (a) a heliport or helistop or(b)a structure more than 200 feet above ground level complies fully with federal and state permit procedures provided for by law, with referral requirements of the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission(ALUC),and with all conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), by the ALUC, and by the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, including the filing of a Form 7480-1 (Notice of Landing Area Proposal) with the FAA. This requirement shall be in addition to all other requirements of the City. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policy: CIRC-4.G Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing Interjurisdictional Coordination CIRC-P.25.Caltrans Coordinate with Caltrans regarding the following actions: • Administration of state highways within the planning area. • Approval of heliports and helistops. • Achievement of State Scenic Highway status for Pacific Coast Highway. • Mutual establishment of clear policies and objectives for meeting regional and local transportation needs. • Development of a plan to reduce dry weather urban runoff and pollutants from highway 41 and street storm flow runoff. tE` • Coordination on all plans, activities, and projects which may affect state roadway facilities. _- City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-23 • Improvement of signal operations on state highways in the city, including the development and implementation of effective signal synchronization programs and advanced signal communications infrastructure. Investigate the potential for Caltrans to relinquish Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway to the City. Departments: Public Works, Planning Division,City Council Related Policies: CIRC-1 A CIRC-5.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.26.Southern California Association of Governments Participate with the Southern California Association of Governments and represent the City's interests in development of regional transportation initiatives such as the Regional Transportation Plan. Departments: Public Works, Planning Division, City Council Related Policies: CIRC-5.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.27.South Coast Air Quality Management District Work closely with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to improve air quality and incorporate the Air Quality Management Plan into the City's practices and programs. Department: Public Works, Planning Division, City Council Related Policies: CIRC-5.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.28.Orange County Transportation Authority Work with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)to achieve the following: • Maintain consistency with the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways(MPAH)within the city. • Pursue amendment of the MPAH to reclassify or delete street segments as identified in Figure CIRC-3. Implement the Congestion Management Program (CMP)in the city. �. • Expand and improve bus service throughout the city, and between Huntington Beach and other communities. �3... � a Encourage provision of attractive and appropriate transit amenities, including shaded bus stops. 8-24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) • Provide special transit services(such as direct shuttle or dial-a-ride services). • Support and implement the OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan, and participate in future updates and revisions to the plan. • Plan and implement an urban rail system that links the city to central Orange County and Los Angeles County. • Investigate the development of a transportation center in the coastal area. • Plan and implement Measure M and M2 projects. • Maintain consistency with OCTA's Long Range Transportation Plan. • Review, every five years, the Orange County Master Plan of Bikeways to ensure consistency. Update Huntington Beach's Bike Plan, as appropriate. • Work with OCTA to study vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure technology. • Support the OC Loop project. • Pursue Measure M Project S funding to link the Goldenwest Transit Center to the resort area of Anaheim as funds are available. Departments: Public Works,City Council Related Policies: CIRC-1.E,CIRC-4.13,CIRC-5.0 Funding Source: General Fund, federal New Starts, state proposition funding, Measure M2 Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.29.Future Santa Ana River Bridge Crossings Participate in ongoing regional planning efforts regarding future Santa Ana River bridge crossings. Departments: Public Works,City Council Related Policy: Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.30.Single-Occupancy Vehicle Legislation Remain aware of national, state,and regional legislation directed at reducing use of single- occupancy vehicles,and do what is feasible to support it. Departments: Public Works,City Manager's Office Related Policy: CIRC-5.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing �f City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-25 CIRC-P.31.Adjacent Jurisdictions and Transportation Agencies Work with adjacent jurisdictions, including the Cities of Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Newport Beach, Seal Beach, and Westminster and Orange County, to ensure that traffic impacts do not adversely impact Huntington Beach. Continue to work with other public agencies to ensure that the city's circulation and transportation system is efficient and meets applicable safety standards. Engage in discussions with Caltrans, OCTA, and Orange County regarding the City assuming jurisdictional control of key areas, and being involved in the decision-making processes of areas in the city which are to remain under Caltrans jurisdiction. Departments: Public Works,Planning Division,City Council Related Policy: CIRC-1.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.32.Transit System Coordination Encourage the inclusion of facilities that transport bicycles,surfboards, and other beach activity equipment on public transit vehicles (both fixed route and paratransit) wherever possible. Work to make routes and vehicles available and accessible to the disabled and seniors. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-4.D,CIRC-4.F Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.33. Preserve Abandoned Rights-of-Way Continue to work with rail agencies to reserve existing and abandoned rights-of-way for future transportation uses, such as transit or bicycle facilities. Department: Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-4.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 8-26 a City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) CIRC-P.34.Undergrounding Utilities Continue to workwith utility service providers to underground wires and transmission lines, especially within scenic corridors. Department: Public Works Related Policy: CIRC-7.F Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Ongoing Education and Outreach CIRC-P.35.Transportation Management Outreach Promote, publicize, and encourage the use of transportation management strategies that will aid in meeting South Coast Air Quality Management District mandates and guidelines, including: • Use of low emission and alternative fuel vehicles in the city, including neighborhood electric vehicles(NEVs). • Use of carpools, vanpools, walking, and multi-occupancy programs for midday uses. • Employers creating Commuter Rideshare Matching Services or databases containing employees' zip codes and commuting preferences to be provided to interested participants. • Employers participating in Guaranteed Ride Home programs that provide rides home to employees. • Employers using flex time, staggered working hours, and other means to reduce commuter traffic during peak hours. • Creating NEV roadway systems and encouraging electrical vehicle charging stations. Continue to participate with the Southern California Association of Governments in ongoing updates to the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Department: Planning Division, Public Works,City Manager's Office Related Policies: CIRC-5.E,CIRC-5.G,CIRC-6.C,CIRC-8.6 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing .j -27 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8 Fuvironmental Resources and Conservation Flement City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs ERC-P.1.Related Programs and Governmental Agencies Continue to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local programs and regulations, including but not limited to the following: • California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and Scoping Plan (AB 32) • California Coastal Act and the California Coastal Commission • California Environmental Quality Act • California Endangered Species Act • California Fish and Game Code • Quimby Act • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit • Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) Departments: Planning Division, Public Works,Community Services Related Policies: ERC-3.D,ERC-4.A,ERC-5 A, ERC-5.D,ERC-7.C,ERC-7.E,ERC-8 A, ERC-8.C, ERC-17.A, ERC-17.13, ERC-17.1 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.2.Greenhouse Gas Emissions Tracking Monitor the status of greenhouse gas emissions in the city,as directed in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, and report the results to City officials and members of the public as part of an annual reporting effort, through the following actions: • Estimate community greenhouse gas emissions to track progress toward adopted greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals of 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 53.33 percent below 2020 levels by 2040. • Track implementation of all greenhouse gas emissions reduction measures and actions, including the status of each effort and progress toward the performance metrics in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program. Department:City Manager's Office Related Policies: ERC-5 A, ERC-5.13, ERC-5.C, ERC-5.D, ERC-5.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Annually beginning in 2017 8-28 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) ERC-P.3.Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program Maintenance Amend the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program regularly based on the results of annual monitoring efforts, to achieve the adopted greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets in a manner consistent with community values. Support increased implementation of successful strategies,and identify opportunities to revise strategies as appropriate. Department:City Manager's Office Related Policies: ERC-5.A, ERC-5.13, ERC-5.C, ERC-5.D, ERC-5.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Annually beginning in 2017 ERC-P.4.Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program Funding Secure the funding necessary to implement the strategies and implementation actions in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program. Identify funding sources as part of an annual report, and integrate funding needs into City department budgets, capital improvement plans, and other plans as appropriate. Pursue federal, state, regional, and local sources of funding as appropriate. Work to ensure that funds are returned to areas where greenhouse gas emissions are generated and that programs benefit the communities impacted by emissions. Departments: City Manager's Office, Finance Department Related Policies: ERC-5.E Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Annually beginning in 2017 ERC-P.5.Water Supply Adequacy Continue to evaluate the adequacy of available water supply and distribution systems relative to proposed development, under both daily operating conditions and in emergency situations. Ensure that the evaluation accounts for forecasted changes in drought conditions and precipitation levels resulting from climate change. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-15.A, ERC-15.13, ERC-15.C, ERC-15.D Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-29 ERC-P.6.Energy Efficiency Audits Develop a program to provide low-or no-cost energy audits to homes and businesses to help identify the most cost-effective ways to improve building energy efficiency. Recommendations should include low-cost actions which can be taken by renters. Publicize the availability of these energy audits, and strongly encourage all building owners interested in installing solar energy systems to conduct an energy efficiency audit prior to installation. Departments: City Manager's Office, Building Division Related Policies: ERC-11.A, ERC-11.0 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: By 2017 ERC-P.7.Energy Efficiency Retrofits Explore strategies to encourage energy efficiency retrofits in existing buildings by making upgrades more economically feasible, including offering incentives or financing mechanisms, and implement cost-effective strategies as feasible. Work to increase participation in property assessed clean energy (PACE) programs. Investigate the feasibility of a revolving loan program to support energy efficiency retrofits. Collaborate with residential and commercial landlords to support energy efficiency upgrades in rental units and leased commercial space. Department:City Manager's Office, Community Development Related Policies: ERC-11.A, ERC-11.13, ERC-11.C, ERC-11.D Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.Q.Energy Efficiency in Large Facilities In partnership with business groups, utility companies, and other involved stakeholders, work with large nonresidential properties to support energy efficiency retrofits in major facilities. Provide recommendations about available rebates and financing mechanisms, encourage highly effective lower-cost actions such as lighting upgrades and retrocommissioning, and work toward providing customized specific solutions for individual facilities based on energy audits or other assessments. Publicize participating facilities in events and in local media. Departments: City Manager's Office,Office of Business Development Related Policies: ERC-11.A, ERC-11.C, ERC-11.D �tFunding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing 8-30 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) ERC-P.9.Green Building Strategy Develop and publicize a voluntary strategy to encourage new buildings to exceed the minimum green building requirements in the current California Building Standards Code, in support of achieving the state's zero net energy targets and other green building goals. Explore the feasibility of offering incentives for new buildings that exceed minimum requirements, including economic rebates, reduced development fees, and streamlined permitting. Make information on green buildings, including cost savings from green building features, available to project applicants throughout the building application process. The Huntington Beach Green Building Strategy should address all elements of a building, including building location and orientation, energy efficiency and renewable energy features, building materials, waste, water conservation and landscaping, and other relevant areas. It should be useful to both residential and nonresidential project applicants. Build on earlier programs such as the Green Building Scorecard. Departments: Community Development, City Manager's Office Related Policies: ERC-12.A, ERC-12.13, ERC-12.C, ERC-13.0 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Establish program by 2020 ERC-P.10.Community Shared Solar Explore the feasibility of a community shared solar program, which allows residents and businesses to receive the economic and environmental benefits of solar energy without needing to purchase panels or install them on their own buildings. Look to examples of successful community shared solar programs in similar jurisdictions,and partner with local solar energy companies and financial institutions to establish a program if one is found to be appropriate for Huntington Beach. Departments: City Manager's Office,Office of Business Development Related Policies: ERC-13.13 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: By 2020 ERC-P.11.Energy Storage Ensure that building-integrated energy storage facilities, relying on non-intrusive technologies such as batteries, are permitted in all land uses that allow residential or nonresidential buildings. Allow stand-alone energy storage facilities in land uses such as industrial and manufacturing areas, where energy storage facilities are compatible with surrounding activities. Confirm that the City building review process, including permit City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) `' 8-31 applications and safety evaluations, does not pose unnecessary regulatory barriers to energy storage facilities. Work with utility providers and energy storage companies to encourage them to locate energy storage facilities in Huntington Beach, in support of California's energy storage mandates. Departments: City Manager's Office, Office of Business Development, Community Development, Fire Related Policies: ERC-13.E, ERC-13.G Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: By 2020 ERC-P.12.Rooftop Solar Installations Encourage new and existing buildings to install rooftop solar panels in support of energy cost savings, energy independence, and statewide zero net energy goals. Provide resources about sizing, financing, and constructing rooftop solar energy systems to community members. Continue to ensure that the City's solar energy permitting process complies with all requirements of AB 2188, and identify opportunities to exceed the requirements of AB 2188 where feasible. Departments: Community Development, Fire Related Policies: ERC-13.A, ERC-13.B, ERC-13.C, ERC-13.D Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.13.Community Choice Aggregation Study the feasibility of creating a new Community Choice Aggregation (CCA)program or joining any existing regional programs, in partnership with nearby communities to the extent possible, and establish or join a CCA program if found to be economically feasible and compatible with community values.Any CCA program the City creates or joins should offer multiple tiers of service with different levels of renewable energy, including a voluntary tier offering 100 percent renewable energy. The CCA's default tier should provide as much or more renewable energy than Southern California Edison's default service. Ensure that a CCA program will be economically competitive with Southern California Edison, and work with local financial institutions to obtain economic support. Departments: City Manager Related Policies: ERC-131 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding t Time Frame: Begin feasibility study by 2020 8-32 Cityof Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017 9 � P ) ERC-P.14.Public Trees Continue to ensure that trees on public lands are preserved to the extent possible, and emphasize protection of trees and groves that provide habitat to sensitive species.Identify opportunities to plant additional trees on public lands and open spaces, including streetscapes.All new trees should be native and drought-tolerant species, and should provide increased habitat for native species to the extent possible. Any public trees that are removed, including due to disease or for public safety reasons,shall be replaced with at least two new trees. Replacement trees should be of a mature size, be the same or similar species, and provide similar public and environmental benefits. Develop a Street Tree Selection Manual to provide guidance and examples of trees that meet these criteria. Department: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-9.A, ERC-9.6, ERC-10.A Funding Source: General Fund, Capital Improvements Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.15.Recreation Programs Continue to provide public recreation programs to Huntington Beach community members. Ensure that such programs are accessible to all community members, including non- English speakers, lower-income residents, and people with physical and developmental disabilities. Identify opportunities to provide additional recreation programs in responseto changing community demographics and needs. When planning new recreational facilities, consider how the facilities will be capable of accommodating future recreational programs. Department:Community Services Related Policies: ERC-2.A, ERC-2.13, ERC-2.C, ERC-2.D, ERC-2.E, ERC-2.F Funding Source: General Fund, userfees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.16.Water Efficiency and Conservation Retrofits Encourage residents and businesses to conduct water efficiency and conservation retrofits, including appliances and landscaping. Identify existing rebates for water efficiency and conservation retrofits, and evaluate opportunities to create additional financial incentives. Departments: Public Works, Building Division Related Policies: ERC-16.13, ERC-16.D 'E Funding Source: General Fund, userfees Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-33 Capital Improvements ERC-P.17.Alternative Vehicles for City Fleet Transition the City vehicle fleet to alternative fuels such as electricity, biofuel, or hydrogen. Replace conventional vehicles at the end of their operational lives with alternative fuel vehicles as feasible. Consider the cost of alternative fuel vehicles relative to conventional vehicles over the entire lifetime of the vehicles. Department: Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-5.G,CIRC-8.13 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.18.Renewable Fuel Stations Install renewable fuel stations, including DC Fast Chargers and biofuel pumps, at City- owned facilities to support alternative fuel fleet vehicles.Open renewable fuel stations to members of the public to the extent feasible. Integrate solar photovoltaic systems into public electric vehicle charging facilities as possible. Encourage installation of renewable fuel stations as part of existing and new development projects. Department: Public Works Related Policies: CIRC-5.G,CIRC-8.A,CIRC-8.13 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.19.Municipal Microgrid Study opportunities to develop a microgrid for critical municipal facilities, allowing them to continue to operate during a power interruption with greater flexibility and in a more environmentally responsible way than currently allowed by diesel backup generators. Proposed microgrids should link key City administration and public safety buildings, as well as other critical facilities such as water pumping stations as feasible, rely on energy storage and renewable energy systems as much as possible, and be consistent with broadband and wireless master plans. Departments: City Manager, Fire, Police, Public Works Related Policies: ERC-13.D, ERC-13.G Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Study completed by 2020 8-34 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) ERC-P.20.Municipal Green Buildings Explore minimum standards for new municipal facilities that require green building and energy efficiency features that exceed state requirements, and explore opportunities to retrofit existing municipal facilities. Study the feasibility of installing renewable energy systems on new and retrofitted municipal facilities, in support of state zero net energy goals. Pursue green building certification for new and retrofitted municipal facilities, and publicize successes in local and regional media. Departments: City Manager, Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: ERC-11.D, ERC-12.C, ERC-13.D Funding Source: Capital Improvement Funds, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.21.New Parks and Open Space Explore opportunities to acquire and develop new parkland and open space, including mini parks, dog parks, athletic fields, amphitheaters, gardens, and shared facilities. Emphasize creating new parkland and open space in currently underserved areas, and in areas expected to see significant new development. Ensure that community members are served equitably by new parkland and open space, and that future parks and open space meet community needs and values. All new parkland and open space should be easily accessible by foot and by bicycle,as well as via public transit to the extent feasible. When possible, locate new parks near elementary schools with independent street frontage. Departments: Community Services,Community Development Related Policies: ERC-1.A, ERC-1.13, ERC-1.C, ERC-1.D, ERC-1.E Funding Source: Capital Improvement Funds Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.22.Open Space Preservation Continue to preserve open space in Huntington Beach, including by setting aside areas within parkland for natural areas. Structures or other development in open space should encourage low-intensity and passive activities such as nature trails, picnic and observational areas, informational signs and displays, and peripheral bike paths. Avoid development or recreational activitiesthat may damage open spaceareas or be otherwise incompatible with existing habitat and native species. Department:Community Services t' Related Policies: ERC-1.H, ERC-6.A, ERC-6.B, ERC-10.A, ERC-10.B, ERC-10.0 Funding Source: General Fund, Capital Improvement Funds Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-35 ERC-P.23.Park and Open Space Restoration Continue to restore disturbed areas within open space land and natural parkland areas. Prevent any invasive plant species from becoming established in open space and natural parkland, and replace nonnative species with native vegetation to the extent possible. While areas should be restored to serve both environmental and public needs, the needs of wildlife and the natural ecosystem should be emphasized over the recreational value of the open space and natural parkland. Use noninvasive green infrastructure and trail design to minimize environmental impacts. Department: Community Services Related Policies: ERC-6.A, ERC-6.E, ERC-7.B, ERC-10.B, ERC-10.D, ERC-17.E Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.24.Vehicle Idling Continue to explore and implement improvements to the local road system to minimize vehicle idling, in coordination with the California Department of Transportation and neighboring jurisdictions. Strategies should include traffic signal synchronization, roundabouts, and modifications to lane configuration where appropriate. Place particular emphasis on reducing idling time near sensitive land uses and in disproportionately affected neighborhoods. All strategies should enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and connectivity to the extent possible, and support additional transit use. No vehicle idling improvement shall reduce pedestrian or bicyclist safety, or significantly increase travel time for pedestrians, bicyclists,and transit users. Department: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-4.C, ERC-4.E Funding Source: Capital Improvement Fund, grant funding, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.25.Trails Network Develop and preserve a comprehensive trails network connecting parks, beaches, recreational facilities, and open spaces within the planning area. The trails network should support walking and biking, and should be compatible .with equestrian uses where feasible. The trails network should include extensive signage with unique branding, and trail maps should be made available online and at easily accessible locations. Trails should be designed to minimize impacts to natural habitats. Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions to connect the trails network to existing or proposed trails in surrounding communities. 8-36 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Departments: Public Works,Community Services Related Policies: ERC-1.G, ERC-3.6, ERC-3.D Funding Source: General Fund, Capital Improvement Funds, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.26.Green Stormwater Infrastructure in Parks and Open Spaces Use green infrastructure for stormwater management in parks and open spaces to the maximum extent possible. Such infrastructure should be sited and designed to minimize runoff and filter water pollutants. Green infrastructure should be integrated into the natural setting to avoid creating disturbances, and should provide additional habitat and other environmental benefits to native species. Other management solutions should only be used if green infrastructure is not feasible. Department: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-10.D, ERC-17.E Funding Source: General Fund, Capital Improvement Funds, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing Development Review Requirements ERC-P.27.Oil and Mineral Extraction Projects Review Continue to review all mineral and oil extraction projects, including any access roads, under CEQA and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act. Continue to require that all mineral and oil extraction projects comply with all federal, state, and local standards and attainment programs for air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, protection of rare/threatened/endangered species, conservation of water quality, protection for basins and watersheds, and erosion protection. Require projects to mitigate noise, odor, and dust impacts. Minimize the amount of land occupied by resource extraction facilities. Visually integrate facilities with adjacent uses through appropriate buffers and walls. Consider limiting the hours of production activities as needed. Require annual inspections and monitoring, including ensuring accurate reporting of production figures. Establish mitigation activities as needed to maintain the standards and conditions required when the permit was issued. Departments: Community Development, Fire Related Policies: ERC-14.A, ERC-14.13 Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-37 ERC-P.28.Oil and Mineral Project Site Reuse Enforce decommissioning and abandonment standards for mineral and oil extraction projects as a condition of approval. Require applicants to include a cost estimate for decommissioning and site restoration work following the cessation of extraction activities, and to post a bond for the estimated amount. Conduct an inspection after decommissioning and site restoration to ensure that all remediation activities have been satisfactorily completed. Require operators to dismantle all structures that cannot be effectively reused, and to recycle all materials as much as possible. Require that all hazardous waste, including electronics or toxic materials, is disposed of in accordance with applicable health and environmental safety standards, and in compliance with the standards of the Basel Convention. Departments: Planning Division, Fire Related Policies: ERC-14.0 Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.29.Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards Continue to implement the energy efficiency standards in the California Building Standards Code for all new development, additions, and significant retrofits, and implement new versions of the California Building Standards Code as they are adopted. Ensure that City building staff receives training and support materials necessary to implement the requirements of the Building Standards Code when new codes become effective. Department: Building Division Related Policies: ERC-11.A, ERC-11.C, ERC-11.D, ERC-12.A,ERC-12.B Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.30.Development Standards for Coastal Protection Create standards to minimize all development, including additions or revisions to existing structures, that jeopardizes or reduces the biological integrity of sensitive coastal plant and animal communities, including all protected species. Work with coastal property owners and project applicants to amend project designs and identify mitigation activities that allow development to proceed while continuing to protect coastal biological communities. All restrictions on development should consider the future condition of biological communities with the effects of sea level rise over the anticipated lifetime of the structure, in accordance with the Coastal Resiliency Program. 8-38 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Departments: Community Development Related Policies: ERC-8.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Standards established by 2020 ERC-P.31.Construction Activity Emissions In partnership with the South Coast Air Quality Management District,continue to enforce standards to reduce air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from construction activities, and impose these standards on new projects as a condition of development. Continue to require the use of best management practices to reduce dust and other airborne debris, reduce idling time for construction equipment, and explore the feasibility of requiring construction projects to use alternative fuel construction equipment. Require monitoring and reporting throughout construction activities to ensure the standards are being properly applied, and promptly remedy any violations. Update standards as needed to support new technologies and practices. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: ERC-4.13, ERC-4.C, ERC-4.D, ERC-5.0 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.32.Coastal Access and Recreation Continue to provide a high degree of access to the coast, and identify opportunities to equitably improve coastal access for all community members that all Huntington Beach community members and visitors have reasonable access to an array of active and passive coastal recreational uses, and consider providing additional recreational uses in other locations to improve access without diminishing existing uses or coastal biological integrity. Departments: Planning Division,Community Services, Public Works Related Policies: ERC-3.A, ERC-3.13, ERC-3.C, ERC-3.D Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.33.Water Conservation for New Development Continue to require new development projects to include feasible and innovative water f conservation features as appropriate. Require the use of recycled water for landscaping irrigation, grading, and other non-contact uses where recycled water is available or expected to be available. Require new projects to include low-impact development " strategies as feasible, which may include green stormwater infrastructure and graywater City of Huntington Beach General Plan {Adopted October 2, 2017} F 8-39 systems. Continue to enforce all applicable landscaping standards, including the Huntington Beach Water Efficient Landscape Requirements and the state Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Departments: Building Division, Public Works Related Policies: ERC-16.A, ERC-16.0 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.34.Drainage and Pollution Standards Continue to require all new development and reuse projects to minimize non-point source pollution and runoff associated with construction activities and ongoing operations. All development projects should employ drainage technologies that reduce runoff and water quality impacts to downstream environments, in accordance with all federal and state water quality requirements. Departments: Building Division, Public Works Related Policies: ERC-17.B, ERC-17.C, ERC-175 Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing Interjurisdictional Coordination ERC-P.35.Energy Efficiency Coordination Continue to coordinate with other jurisdictions in Orange County and in the Southern California region to provide education and incentives to improve energy efficiency in new and existing buildings. Work with state partners, utility companies, and regional advocacy groups to maximize community awareness and to provide community members with necessary resources. Departments: City Manager's Office Related Policies: ERC-11.A, ERC-11.C, ERC-12.A, ERC-13.G Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.36.Marine Biological Productivity Coordination Coordinate with federal, state, and regional agencies and jurisdictions to sustain the a biological productivity of coastal waters and maintain healthy populations of marine species.Work to provide viable population sizes and genetic diversity to ensure long-term survival of the species, and to support long-term commercial, recreational, and educational purposes as viable. 8-40 ;A City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Departments: Public Works,Community Services Related Policies: ERC-8.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.37.Tidal Circulation Coordination Work with surrounding jurisdictions to improve the tidal circulation in the Bolsa Chica Channel, Huntington Harbour, the Huntington Beach Wetlands, and Anaheim Bay. Coordinate to minimize construction of features that impact natural sand migration and littoral drift within the local environment. Develop ways to improve tidal circulation while also supporting increased biological integrity of coastal habitats, and improving the aesthetics and recreational viability of coastal areas. Work with the State Lands Commission and the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways to ensure they secure funding to maintain the Bolsa Chica tidal inlet. Departments: Public Works,Community Services Related Policies: ERC-8.B Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.38.Air Pollutants and GHG Emissions from StationaU Sources Work with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the California Air Resources Board, in coordination with local business groups,to decrease air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from large industrial facilities and other stationary sources. Pursue funding to reduce emissions from major sources, and prioritize emissions reduction activities near sensitive land uses and in dis proportionally affected neighborhoods. Continue to coordinate with federal, state, and regional agencies to enforce air quality standards and improve air quality. As future land use plans are proposed and/or amended, undertake heightened consideration of policies and strategies to minimize exposure of sensitive land uses and dis proportionally affected neighborhoods to health risks related to air pollution. Departments: City Manager's Office,Community Development Related Policies: ERC-4.A, ERC-45, ERC-5.D Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-41 0 ERC-P.39.Regional Recreation Coordination Partner with surrounding communities and Orange County to increase access to a wide range of recreational services and programs for Huntington Beach community members. Explore opportunities to work with private recreational businesses to provide facilities and services to community members that cannot be feasibly provided by public programs. Work with local school districts to offer after-hours recreational activities for children and adults at school sites. Ensure that information on expanded recreational opportunities resulting from coordination with other agencies and private businesses is made readily available to community members through multiple sources and in multiple languages. Department:Community Services, Library Services Related Policies: ERC-2.A, ERC-2.C, ERC-2.D, ERC-2.E, ERC-25 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.40.Alternative Water Source Coordination and Expansion Continue to provide water through the Orange County Water District's Green Acres recycled water project and Groundwater Replenishment System. In coordination with the Orange County Water District and surrounding communities, continue to explore opportunities to improve and expand alternative water sources to reduce imported water supplies and sustainably manage the Coastal Plains of Orange County Groundwater Basin. Alternative water sources shall meet community water supply and quality needs while minimizing environmental impacts and maximizing cost effectiveness. Department: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-15.C, ERC-15.D Funding Source: General Fund, Capital Improvements Funds, utility fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.41.Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program Collaboration and Public Outreach Develop partnerships with other public agencies, private organizations and nonprofits, businesses and trade groups, local institutions, and members of the public to support implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program. Establish and maintain formal partnerships with organizations that provide tools and support for greenhouse gas reduction efforts. Keep members of the public informed about ongoing Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program implementation efforts, and provide opportunities for community members to offer feedback on these efforts. Departments: City Manager's Office }' Related Policies: ERC-5.E Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Annually beginning in 2017 8-42 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Public Information and Outreach ERC-P.42.Energy Efficiency and Conservation Education Widely distribute information about energy efficiency and conservation strategies, including information about rebates, financing opportunities, and low-cost and free strategies. Provide information about energy efficiency and conservation strategies for both residential and nonresidential facilities. Distribute information in multiple languages through in-person events and workshops, print media, television, radio, and online/social media. Identify members of the Huntington Beach community that are not easily reached by conventional outreach campaigns, and develop community engagement strategies to involve these community members. Department:City Manager's Office Related Policies: ERC-11.A, ERC-11.13, ERC-11.0 Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.43.Water Efficiency and Conservation Education Expand existing water efficiency and conservation education campaigns to provide ` information about reducing water use to Huntington Beach residents and businesses. Include information about available rebates, financing opportunities for retrofits, and low- cost and free water efficiency and conservation options. Information should be distributed in multiple languages through in-person events and workshops, print media, television, radio, and online/social media. Identify members of the Huntington Beach community that are not easily reached by conventional outreach campaigns, and develop community engagement strategies to involve these community members. Continue water efficiency and conservation efforts during normal or wet water years,and work to ensure that water efficiency and conservation accomplishments continue outside of drought conditions. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-16.6, ERC-16.D Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: By 2020 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) J, 8-43 Natural and Environmental Hazards Element City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs HAZ-P.1.Related Programs and Governmental Agencies Continue to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local programs and regulations, including but not limited to the following: • Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act • Emergency Services Act • Hazardous Waste Control Act • Seismic Hazards Mapping Act Departments: Community Development, Public Works, Fire Related Policies: HAZ-1.A, HAZ-5.A Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.2.Inventory Existing Geologic and Seismic Vulnerabilities Conduct an inventory of existing structures that may be vulnerable to geologic and seismic hazards, including unreinforced masonry structures, older concrete buildings, and wood structures with weak first floors. Advise owners and occupants of potentially vulnerable structures of available mitigation opportunities and available funding sources. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: HAZ-1.D Funding Source: Grantfunds, General Fund Time Frame: Inventory complete by 2020 HAZ-13.3.Potential Sea Level Rise Hazard Area Update the Certified Local Coastal Program to establish a Sea Level Rise Hazard Zone based on the Potential Sea Level Rise Hazard Area identified in General Plan Figure HAZ-6. Within the hazard zone: • Encourage new development applicants to design projects to address coastal hazards. Identify preferred strategies to help existing property owners in the hazard area to improve resiliency to sea level rise,and ensure that funding mechanisms are available to support resiliency efforts. Funding should emphasize the use of soft shore stabilization and avoid shore armoring structures. .w 8-44 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Departments: Community Development Related Policies: HAZ-2.A Funding Sources: General Fund, grant funds Time Frame: Local Coastal Program amendment by 2020, ongoing implementation HAZ-P.4.Runoff and Ponding Standards Amend the Municipal Code to establish standards for new development and significant retrofit projects to reduce the risk of increased runoff and ponding, and to support increased groundwater recharge.These standards shall emphasize the use of permeable paving, bioswales, and other low-impact development strategies. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-3.A, HAZ-3.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Standards established by 2020, ongoing implementation HAZ-P.5.Fire Inspections Continue to conduct regular inspections of nonresidential buildings to ensure that fire safety standards are met. Residential occupancies, based on type, shall be inspected at a minimum frequency as required by state law. Department: Fire Related Policies: HAZ-4.A, HAZ-4.13 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.6.Abandoned Oil Wells Reevaluate the safety and status of abandoned oil wells on brownfield properties where new development or reuse projects are proposed. Identify whether the well was properly decommissioned or whether mitigation activities may be necessary. Department: Fire Related Policies: HAZ-5.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 31 >: s: City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-45 HAZ-P.7.Alternative Brownfield Uses Identify and maintain a database of brownfield sites that may not be suitable for residential or nonresidential development. Work with property owners to encourage alternative use of such sites, including but not limited to renewable energy facilities, open spaces,or other community-supporting uses. Seek federal, state, and private funds for the assessment and remediation of brownfield sites in the city that have redevelopment potential. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: HAZ-5.A, HAZ-5.13 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Database completed by 2020, ongoing implementation HAZ-P.8.Hazardous Materials Inspections and Database Continue to conduct inspections of facilities that manufacture, transport,store,process,or dispose of hazardous material and waste. Ensure that all information in City databases is up to date and that facilities are complying with all applicable requirements. Identify opportunities for facilities to improve their hazardous materials and waste methods to comply with best management practices. The City's participating agency will coordinate with other certified unified program agencies (CUPAs) in Orange County and with the California Environmental Protection Agency CUPA office to ensure the program is funded and equipped and that the employees receive proper training. Department: Fire Related Policies: HAZ-6.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.9.Hazardous Materials Response Protocols Establish and maintain emergency response protocols to ensure that City staff and any other emergency responders are notified immediately if there is a hazardous materials or waste release, or if another emergency situation poses the significant chance of such a release occurring. Departments: Fire, Police Related Policies: HAZ-6.C, HAZ-6.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.10.Methane Overlay Districts Continue to evaluate the locations and concentrations of soils that may contain methane, and adjust the boundaries of the Methane Overlay Districts as needed. Continue to require methane testing and appropriate mitigation activities prior to any new development in a Methane Overlay District, including methane isolation barriers, collection systems, and vent systems. 8-46 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Departments: Community Development, Fire Related Policies: HAZ-6.D Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.11.Special Event Staff Identify key staff to be mobilized during special events for proactive community policing, and provide staff with training that focuses on maintaining security during special events while engaging and respecting community members. Departments: Fire, Police, Community Services Related Policies: HAZ-9.A, HAZ-9.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.12.Homeland Security and Emergency Operations Plans Regularly update the Huntington Beach Emergency Operations Plan to identify key staff to participate in homeland security emergency response and recovery operations; the structure and operating protocols of the City's homeland security emergency response and recovery organizations; and community engagement practices during homeland security emergency response and recovery activities. Departments: Fire, Police Related Policies: HAZ-9.B Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Capital Improvements HAZ-P.13.Funding for Geologic and Seismic Retrofits Identify funding sources to help property owners retrofit existing structures vulnerable to geologic and seismic hazards. Explore state and regional incentives, federal programs, and grant opportunities from private organizations. Study available financing mechanisms the City can establish to support retrofits, including property-based financing and a City- backed seismic retrofit fund. Any available financing program should include strategies to limit impacts to affordable housing. Departments: Office of Business Development, City Manager's Office Related Policies: HAZ-1.B, HAZ-1.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Identify funding sources by 2020, ongoing updates t City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) a 8-47 HAZ-P.14.Resilient Critical Facilities Require all new critical, essential, or high-occupancy buildings, including public safety buildings, to be sited, designed, and constructed so as to minimize damage and maximize continuation of key functions during and after a geologic and seismic hazard event. Prepare an inventory of City-owned facilities that may be vulnerable to seismic and geologic hazards, particularly facilities that serve vital functions. Coordinate with utility companies and districts to conduct reviews of power lines, key surface streets,natural gas pipelines, and other critical infrastructure not owned by the City. Use this inventory to pursue funding to retrofit vulnerable City-owned facilities, and work with other organizations to support retrofits of non-City-owned infrastructure. Departments: Community Development, Fire, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-1.C, HAZ-1.D Funding Source: Grantfunds, Capital Improvement Plan Time Frame: Standards and inventory established by 2020 HAZ-P.15.Shore Stabilization and Beach Management In accordance with the Coastal Resiliency Program, promote the use of soft shore stabilization strategies such as vegetated dunes, beach nourishment, and marsh restoration as an alternative to shore-armoring projects (e.g., seawalls, jetties, breakwaters). Allow for shore armoring only in instances where soft stabilization is insufficient to prevent a potential health hazard or significant structural damage. Identify opportunities to replace shore armoring with soft stabilization features. Continue to coordinate with other regional coastal communities, particularly upshore communities, to support a regional strategy for beach nourishment and sediment management. This strategy should allow for anticipated changes to sea levels and minimize the use of shore armoring. Department: Public Works,Community Services Related Policies: HAZ-2.D Funding Sources: Grant funds, Capital Improvement Plan, General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.16.Flood Control Infrastructure Employ natural, on-site drainage strategies such as low-impact development to minimize e., the amount of stormwater that flows into pipes or conveyance systems.Work to improve the flood infrastructure in Huntington Beach through the following actions: In coordination with OC Flood and the US Army Corps of Engineers, retrofit and improve existing flood control infrastructure, and identify needs for new infrastructure. 8-48 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) • Conductlexpand routine maintenance and upgrades to City-owned drainage infrastructure to clear blocked storm drains, upgrade infrastructure to accommodate an increased volume of stormwater, secure additional funding, and maximize system efficiency and minimize system overload during periods of heavy rainfall. Department: Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-3.B Funding Source: Capital Improvement Plan Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.17.Hazardous Materials Transport Routes Identify roadways with minimal exposure to residential areas or other sensitive uses that provide convenient access to major industrial areas and regional highways, and are designed to accommodate large vehicles as Hazardous Materials Transport Routes. Encourage all organizations in Huntington Beach that send or receive hazardous materials or waste to use these roadways for transportation to the extent possible, and to transport hazardous materials or waste during off-peak times.Conduct retrofits to otherwise suitable roadways to provide additional alternatives for the transportation of hazardous materials and waste. Department: Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-6.B Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.18.Emergency Alerts Continue to update and improve City plans to effectively alert and warn all community members in the event of a potential threat, an imminent threat, and/or a need to evacuate. Distribute notices and pre-prepared messages through multiple methods, including television, phone, online, social media, mobile devices, radio, and door-to-door notification. Notices should be in all languages widely spoken in the community, including Spanish, Vietnamese, and Chinese. All notifications should be accessible for people with disabilities and with access/functional needs. Departments: Fire, Police, Community Services,City Manager's Office Related Policies: HAZ-25, HAZ-8.B, HAZ-8.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 1 ., City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-49 Development Review Requirements HAZ-P.19.Geologic and Seismic Assessments and Resiliencx Require a geologic and seismic hazard assessment prior to the construction of new buildings or significant retrofits to existing buildings located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The assessment shall address fault location and activity, soil engineering and building foundations, slope stability and erosion control, liquefaction risk, groundwater, and any other geologic and seismic conditions which may affect structural stability. Require new structures to include appropriate engineering and building practices to improve resiliency to ground shaking and liquefaction, including meeting or exceeding the minimum standards in the California Building Standards Code. Work with applicants to construct buildings that can remain safely habitable following an earthquake, to the extent possible, particularly in areas of elevated vulnerability to geologic and seismic hazards. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-1.A Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.20.Bluff Erosion Drainage Plans Require all new proposed bluff-top development projects to prepare and implement drainage plans to minimize erosion. Drainage plans shall encourage to the extent possible the use of"soft infrastructure"such as landscaping, low-impact development, and natural grading. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-2.C, HAZ-2.E Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.21.Flood and Sea Level Rise Hazard Mitigation During development review, determine if any structures meant for human habitation are to be constructed within the 100-year flood plain or in the Potential Sea Level Rise Hazard Area. • If necessary, evaluate each structure's safety from flood and sea level rise-related hazards, and recommend remedial actions, including changes to building design and siting, drainage infrastructure, and low-impact development features. This evaluation should include mention of the structure's likely economic life span, and whether sea level rise may threaten the structure at any point during its life span. 8-50 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) • New development projects should conduct a soil analysis to determine if there is an elevated potential for ponding or runoff, and, if needed, improved drainage and low- impact development strategies should be included in the project design. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-3.A, HAZ-3.B Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.22.Fire Hazard Reduction Continue to review all new development and reuse projects to ensure that structures meet or exceed all minimum standards for fire safety and access by emergency personnel, including the requirements in the California Building Code and California Fire Code. Departments: Community Development, Fire Related Policies: HAZ-4.A, HAZ-4.B Funding Source: Cost of development Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.23.New Development on Brownfield Sites Conduct testing on any site known or suspected to have previously contained potentially hazardous materials or waste, and require appropriate mitigation if the concentration of such materials exceeds minimum safety standards. Mitigation activities shall be conducted prior to construction and be subject to ongoing monitoring. Subsequent testing must find that any potentially hazardous materials or waste is below unsafe concentrations before construction permits are issued. Departments: Planning Division, Fire Related Policies: HAZ-5.B Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.24.Hazardous Materials in New Development Limit the risk associated with hazardous materials in new development through the following actions: • Discourage any facility that manufactures, transports, stores, processes,or disposes of significant quantities of hazardous materials or waste from being located in residential areas, or in close proximity to a school, park, hospital, key community , facilities, or other sensitive uses. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-51 0 • Require that all new development or reuse projects that propose to manufacture, transport, store, process, or dispose of hazardous materials or waste store such material in storage tanks that meet or exceed all required and recommended safety standards, including resiliency to seismic and geologic events, flooding, and fire. Department: Fire Related Policies: HAZ-6.A Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.26.New Development Consistency with Aircraft Operations Continue to ensure that all new development proposals more than 200 feet above ground level or development proposals for new heliports comply fully with all state and federal permit procedures, with the requirements of the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission,and with all conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: HAZ-7.A Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing Interjurisdictional Coordination HAZ-P.26.Regional Tsunami Coordination Continue to consult with neighboring communities and regional, state, and federal agencies regarding tsunami preparedness and evacuation efforts. Department: Fire Related Policies: HAZ-3.C,HAZ-3.D Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.27.Waste Disposal and Contaminated Materials Coordination Coordinate with federal, state, and county agencies to ensure that contaminated wastes do not migrate onto adjacent sites or impact groundwater resources.Work with regional, state, and federal agencies engaged in cleanup efforts of uncontrolled contaminated sites previously used for waste disposal. 8-52 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Departments: Fire, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-6.B, HAZ-6.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.28.Hazardous Materials Source Reduction Coordinate with industry representatives, researchers, and government agencies to identify cost-effective ways for businesses to reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated by normal operations, and encourage businesses to adopt these methods as part of their regular practice. Publicly recognize businesses that successfully reduce the amount of hazardous waste produced. Departments: Fire, Office of Business Development Related Policies: HAZ-6.C, HAZ-6.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.29.Hazardous Materials Coordination Continue to coordinate with federal, state, and county agencies on hazardous materials and waste programs, including site selection and screening for hazardous waste management facilities, household hazardous waste collection efforts, sharing and standardization of hazardous materials and waste data, and comprehensive emergency response actions for spills and illegal dumping of hazardous materials and waste. Departments: Fire, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-6.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.30.Regional Aircraft Operation and Hazards Coordination Continue to coordinate with regional agencies to ensure local land use plans are consistent with the safe and effective operation of airports and helipads, and that City emergency response plans address the potential hazards associated with aircraft. Departments: Planning Division, Fire Related Policies: HAZ-7.A, HAZ-7.B, HAZ-7.0 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing I t City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-53 HAZ-P.31.Homeland Security Coordination Continue to coordinate with regional, state, and federal agencies on homeland security threats. Distribute and share intelligence on potential threats, create synchronized plans for consistent emergency response,and work together on preventative homeland security actions. Departments: Fire, Police, City Manager's Office Related Policies: HAZ-9.A, HAZ-9.B, HAZ-9.C, HAZ-9.D Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Public Information and Outreach HAZ-P.32.Tsunami-Ready Program Continue to participate in the National Weather ServiceTsunami-Ready program. Provide clearly labeled tsunami warning and evacuation signs, designate tsunami shelters, conduct public tsunami education efforts, monitor and rapidly publicize any tsunami notifications, and comply with all other requirements of the Tsunami-Ready program. Department: Fire Related Policies: HAZ-3.C, HAZ-3.D Funding Source: Grantfunding, General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.33.Household Hazardous Waste Disposal Require that waste franchise haulers offer information about how residents, businesses, and other organizations may conveniently dispose of small quantities of hazardous materials, including electronic waste,cleaning supplies,paints and varnishes,landscaping chemicals, and automotive fluids. These methods shall be low-cost, or free to the extent possible. All hazardous materials shall be disposed of or reprocessed in a responsible manner that fully complies with all articles of the Basel Convention. Department: Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-6.0 Funding Source: Userfees Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.34.Emergency Preparation ITT Improve local emergency preparedness through the following community engagement and outreach actions: 8-54 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) • Offer free emergency planning and response classes, including participation in Community Emergency Response Teams training, to Huntington Beach community members. • Distribute information about possible risks in Huntington Beach, ways to reduce risk, and effective post-emergency recovery strategies to community members through in- person events, online, and in print and electronic media in multiple languages, including Spanish, Vietnamese, and Chinese. • Work with local businesses to prepare workplace emergency plans, and to conduct regular drills and other preparatory exercises for emergency situations. • Work with the school districts to educate schoolchildren about ways to prepare for emergency situations, and to coordinate school emergency plans with City plans. Consider shelter in place provisions,evacuation needs, provisions for school closure, and consistency with City and regional shelter plans. • Develop emergency education programs for elderly and disabled persons, in collaboration with medical providers, residential care workers, and other supportive organizations. • Ensure that City evacuation plans include provisions for the safe and efficient evacuation of individuals with limited mobility, including elderly residents and persons with disabilities. • Continue to have the Huntington Beach Fire Department sponsor the Senior Home Inspection Program (Project SHIP), where volunteers conduct free home fire safety inspections for seniors in the city which can provide free smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors as funding is available. Departments: Fire, Police Related Policies: HAZ-2.E, HAZ-6.C, HAZ-8.A Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.35.Neighborhood-Based Coastal Resiliency Task Forces Convene neighborhood specific coastal resiliency task forces, or utilize existing neighborhood specific groups and committees to vet and implement resilience strategies that balance the diverse stakeholder interests. Prioritize neighborhoods with highly vulnerable communities and assets such as Huntington Harbour and Sunset Beach and include community members, City staff, and relevant stakeholders such as Caltrans, Southern California Edison, Sunset Beach Sanitary District, homeowners associations, and the County of Orange. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-2.E Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-55 Noisel City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs N-P.1. Noise-Mitigating Design Guidelines Establish design guidelines for residential, commercial, industrial, and mixed-use structures that respond to noise concerns. Provide the guidelines to developers at an appropriate time during the development review process. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: N-13, N-2.0 Funding Sources: General fund, development fees Time Frame: Guidelines established by 2020, ongoing implementation N-P.2. Industrial Hours of Operation Update the Municipal Code to establish and enforce appropriate hours of operation for industrial activities with the potential to result in excessive noise with potential to disturb noise-sensitive land uses. Such activities include, but are not limited to, mechanical operations and truck deliveries. Departments: Community Development, Police Related Policies: NAA Funding Source: General fund Time Frame: Code updates completed by 2020, ongoing implementation and enforcement N-P.3. Noise Ordinance Updates Update the Noise Ordinance regularly on a cycle of no more than every 10 years. During each update, conduct the following: • Monitor on-the-ground conditions in areas of existing or likely noise-related conflict. • Conduct public outreach. • Evaluate the adequacy of enforcement mechanisms, and implement a system for tracking and monitoring locations where known or repetitive violations of noise standards have occurred or in locations where excessive noise disproportionately impacts disadvantaged communities. • Identify specific exterior noise standards for industrial and commercial properties located adjacent to sensitive land uses, and incorporate project design features that reduce noise conflicts between industrial and commercial properties and sensitive land uses. 8-56 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Departments: Community Development Related Policies: N-1.A Funding Source: General fund Time Frame: Every 10 years,ongoing Capital Improvements N-P.4. Noise Barrier Construction Funding Secure funding to support construction of noise barriers to protect private outdoor yard areas along arterial roadways where existing homes are exposed to noise levels above the standards identified in Noise Element Table N-2. Develop a priority program for the construction of such barriers. Department: Public Works Related Policies: N-3.6, N-3.0 Funding Sources: General fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing Development Review Requirements N-P.6. Construction Hours Enforce the following requirements during environmental review of proposed projects: • Limit construction activities that would produce an hourly L.,above 85 dBA to between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. if such activities are proposed to occurwithin 100 feet of identified noise-sensitive uses. • Alternative mitigation may be considered for projects that would require pile driving or nighttime activities such as pumping or truck hauling. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: N-4.A, N-4.D Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing N-P.6. Acoustical Studies Acoustical studies will be required for all discretionary projects where any of the following conditions apply: The proposed project includes anoise-sensitive land use that is located within the existing or future(Figure N-2)65 dBA CNEL contour for transportation noise sources. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-57 • The proposed project will cause future traffic volumes to increase by 25 percent or more on any roadway that fronts a sensitive land use. • The proposed project will expose a noise-sensitive land use to a stationary noise source or vibration source exceeding the standards outlined in the Noise Ordinance. Such stationary sources may include mechanical equipment operations, entertainment venues,and industrial facilities. • The proposed project includes a noise-sensitive land use in the vicinity of existing or proposed commercial and industrial areas. • The proposed project is a mixed-use development that includes a residential component. The focus of this type of acoustical study is to determine likely interior and exterior noise levels and to recommend appropriate design features to reduce noise. An acoustical analysis prepared in accordancewith the Noise Element and the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance (Section 8.40 of the Municipal Code) shall: • Be the financial responsibility of the applicant seeking City approval of a project. • Be prepared by a qualified person experienced in the fields of environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics. • Include representative noise level measurements with sufficient sampling periods and locations to adequately describe local conditions and predominant noise sources. Noise level measurements must be conducted at the time of greatest potential for noise level increases above baseline conditions or allowed by law. • Estimate existing and projected cumulative noise in terms of CNELor LeQj and compare those noise levels to Noise Element standards and policies. • Recommend appropriate mitigation to achieve compliance with Noise Element policies and standards. Where the noise source in question consists of intermittent single events,the report must address the effects of maximum noise levels in sleeping rooms in terms of possible sleep disturbance. • Estimate noise exposure after the prescribed mitigation measures have been implemented. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: N-2.A Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing 8-58 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) N-P.7. Noise Considerations in Development Review Review development proposals to ensure that noise standards and compatibility criteria set forth in Noise Element Table N-2 are met. Consult Noise Element guidelines and standards for noise-compatible land uses to determine the suitability of proposed projects relative to existing and forecasted noise levels. Enforce the California Noise Insulation Standards to ensure an acceptable interior noise level of 45 dbA CNEL in habitable rooms. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: N-1.A,N-4.13 Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing Interjurisdictional Coordination N-P.8. Noise Barrier Coordination Coordinate with Caltrans to complete the installation of freeway noise barriers along Interstate 405 and Beach Boulevard (State Route 39) facilities to attenuate noise for existing noise-sensitive land uses. Department: Public Works Related Policies: N-3.E Funding Source: General fund Time Frame: Ongoing EE1 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-59 Public services ana infrastructureto City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs PSI-P.1. Related Programs and Governmental Agencies Continue to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local programs and regulations, including but not limited to the following: • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) • Municipal Separate Storm Water System Permit Program • Groundwater Management Act • California Public Resources Code • California Water Code • California Urban Water Management Planning Act • California Integrated Waste Management Act • California Education Code • Orange County NPDES Municipal Storm Water Permit Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: HAZ-3.A, PSI-7.E Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.2. Fire and Emergency Response Performance Objectives Adopt locally defined performance objectives for fire, marine safety, and emergency response. Track compliance with adopted performance goals for fire and emergency medical services quarterly and report the information annually to the City Council and community residents. Use annual report results to modify and better locate fire resources (e.g., stations, equipment, personnel) to meet established emergency response performance objectives. Annually evaluate fire department staffing levels and workload projections,and modify the Capital Improvement Program and operations plans, as necessary,to ensure facilities, equipment, and personnel meet established performance objectives. 8-60 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Department: Fire Related Policies: PSI-2.A, PSI-2.B, PSI-2.D, PSI-25 Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Annually PSI-P.3. Fire Hazard Response Minimize the amount of time needed for dispatch and turnout to effectively respond to any reported fire hazard, and identify remedial actions that should be taken to reduce travel time based on conditions experienced during the incident. Departments: Fire Related Policies: PSI-2.A, PSI-2.B, PSI-2.C, PSI-2.D, PSI-2.E, PSI-2.G Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.4. Urban Water Management Plan Continue to update the Huntington Beach Urban Water Management Plan everyfive years to include estimates for population, water demand, and water supply with projections in five-year increments. Department: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-15.A, ERC-15.B, PSI-6.B, PSI-6.0 Funding Sources: General Fund or grant funding Time Frame: Every five years PSI-P.5. Citywide Infrastructure Master Plans Prepare and adopt coordinated, citywide infrastructure master plans and conduct annual evaluations. Review and update infrastructure master plans within one year of evaluation if information or policies are found to be outdated or no longer relevant. Department: Public Works Related Policies: PSI-6.A, PSI-6.B, PSI-6.C, PSI-7.A, PSI-7.B, PSI-7.C, PSI-75, PSI- 8.A, PSI-8.B, PSI-8.C, PSI-11.B, PSI-11.0 Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Develop citywide infrastructure master plans by 2020, review annually PSI-P.6.Water Reuse and Recycling Plan 41,E f Examine the feasibility and potential benefits of a water reuse and recycling plan. As appropriate, amend the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to establish a pre-plumbing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-61 ordinance that supports installation of future greywater systems within all new development and reuse projects. Department: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-15.C, ERC-16.A, ERC-17.D Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Municipal Code revisions completed by 2020 PSI-P.7. Public Library Facilities Plan Establish and implement a public library facilities plan to: • Ensure the library system both meets California State Library recommended standards and adequately serves community needs. • Explore with local school districts the use of school libraries serving as City library satellites. • Continue to support after-school programs, job training programs, workshops, and other activities. • Expand library outreach services for seniors and others who are physically unable to visit library facilities. • Explore all funding and grant options available to support upgrading library facilities and amenities; support library efforts to incorporate the best technology and facilities; and support technology and facility upgrade efforts in libraries to ensure community members have access to state-of-the-art amenities. Department: Library Services Related Policies: PSI-3.A, PSI-3.6, PSI-3.C, PSI-3.D, PSI-4.D Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Facilities plan completed by 2020 PSI-P.8. Development Fees Perform a nexus fee study and revise City development fees to ensure that new development and reuse projects pay for a fair share of public infrastructure in a manner coordinated with improvements identified in the City's infrastructure management plans. Departments: Community Development, Public Works, Fire, Police, Library Services, Community Services Related Policies: PSI-6.6, PSI-7.D, PSI-8 A, PSI-8.C, PSI-11.6 Funding Sources: General Fund kf Time Frame: Complete nexus fee study by 2020, update fees annually 8-62 City 9 of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) PSI-P.9. Police Department Annually review police department staffing levels and workload projections and modify the Capital Improvement Program and operations plans, as necessary, to ensure facilities, equipment, and personnel meet established performance objectives. Annually evaluate crime trends and police services, facilities, personnel, and response times relative to community needs and established state and federal standards. Departments: Police Related Policies: PSI-1.A, PSI-1.6, PSI-1.C, PSI-1.F, PSI-1 J Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing, annually PSI-P.10. Special Events Review special events for the need to coordinate enhanced solid waste removal and police protection in conjunction with the permitting process. Identify fees associated with additional costs to be paid by event sponsors. Departments: Community Services Beach Division, Police Related Policies: PSI-15, PSI-9.D Funding Sources: General Fund, user fees Time Frame: Fee structure based on individual agreements or as events are proposed PSI-P.11. Public Service and Infrastructure Improvements Continue to adopt and update the City's operating budget to maintain adequate public services, facilities, and infrastructure, exceed national averages, and coordinate development of community facilities and amenities and capital projects. Evaluate the cost- effective provision of public services and seek innovative funding sources to provide services and maintain and upgrade existing infrastructure systems to counteract decreasing federal, state, and county funding sources, including grants, infrastructure financing districts,and other sources. Department: Public Works,Community Development Related Policies: PSI-1.6, PSI-2.13, PSI-3.A, PSI-3.D, PSI-4.A, PSI-4.C, PSI-6.A, PSI- 6.C, PSI-7.A, PSI-7.13, PSI-7.F, PSI-8.A, PSI-9.C, PSI-11.A, PSI-11.0 Funding Sources: General Fund, federal, state and county funds, grants, infrastructure financing districts Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-63 PSI-P.12. Infrastructure Technology Expand infrastructure technology in Huntington Beach by: • Partnering with local utility and telecommunication companies to coordinate and implement the most advanced and effective infrastructure technology possible. • Ensuring that budgeting for police, fire, and EMS services enables procurement of the most advanced technology accessible to aid in these services. • Encouraging and facilitating the installation of fiber optic internet service starting in the Research and Technology designated industrial areas. • Evaluate a comprehensive information systems platform based on geospatial reckoning across all City departments to keep residents informed. Departments: Public Works, Fire, Police, City Manager's Office Related Policies: PSI-1.1, PSI-2.D, PSI-10.A, PSI-10.C, PSI-10.D, PSI-10.D Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.13. Recycling and Composting In coordination with the City's waste hauler, build on existing waste collection and reduction programs to support California's goal of a 75 percent recycling rate by 2020 and to support long-term zero-waste efforts. Develop a composting program for commercial businesses,and expand participation to include single-family and multifamily residences as feasible. Identify materials that cannot be easily recycled or composted in Huntington Beach, and develop strategies that allow for effective diversion of these items. Improve the amount of construction and demolition (C&D)waste recycled in the community, and establish minimum diversion criteria that exceed state requirements for all future waste hauler contracts. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: PSI-9.A, PSI-9.13, PSI-9.C, PSI-9.E, PSI-95, PSI-9.G Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing s" 8-64 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Capital Improvements PSI-P.14. Capital Improvement Program Use the City's 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)process to prioritize, fund, and build required infrastructure and public facility improvements, including: • Wastewater collection facilities • Water supply and distribution facilities • Water storage and transmission facilities • Storm drain and flood control facilities Use public capital resources in combination with private financing sources and seek regional, state, and federal funds to supplement local funding of infrastructure projects listed in the CIP. Department: Public Works,Community Development Related Policies: PSI-6.C, PSI-75, PSI-8.A, PSI-8.C, PSI-11.A, PSI-11.0 Funding Sources: Enterprise funds, service fees, impact fees,grants, General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.16. Storm Drain Improvements Design, preserve, and acquire land for water storage and transmission facilities, storm drain, and flood facilities. Provide for the construction of necessary pump and storage facilities to ensure adequate water supply and proper water system balance and the installation of stormwater drain gates. Evaluate existing environmental degradation or potential degradation from current or planned storm drain and flood control facilities in wetlands or other sensitive environments. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: ERC-7.G, PSI-7.13, PSI-7.0 Funding Sources: Impact fees, grants, General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.16. Installation of Trash and Recycling Receptacles Design and install additional trash and recycling receptacles in public areas, including but not limited.to Downtown, Beach Boulevard, City parks,and along.the beach. Departments: Community Services, Public Works Related Policies: PSI-9.D Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: 2020 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-65 Development Review Requirements PSI-P.17. Development Review Through the development and design review processes for new development and reuse projects, require or continue to require the following: • That sufficient utility and water capacity is available. If sufficient capacity is not currently available, additional capacity or adequate mitigation shall be provided by the project. • Useof energy-and water-efficient fixtures and design elements to the maximum extent feasible consistentwith City codes and policies. • Use of drought-tolerant and native landscaping to the maximum extent feasible consistent with City codes and policies. • Adequate receptacles for trash, recycling,and composting, as applicable. • Completion of studies to determine water and sewer right-of-way and infrastructure requirements for future development projects, including that study recommendations be incorporated into the design of proposed projects. Payment of costs associated with providing new and improving wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste services shall be the responsibility of the project applicant. • Incorporation of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design(CPTED)techniques into site planning and architectural design including territoriality, natural surveillance, activity support, and access control. • Adequate street widths and clearance for emergency access and the provision of all appropriate safety features. • Evaluate the need for additional technology infrastructure in building design, both from the street and within the building. Continue to consult with the fire and police departments and utility providers to: • Evaluate the need for additional fire and police facilities or resources to serve new development projects during the development review process. • Evaluate the need for safety features when improving streets and critical intersections. • Ensure capacity and infrastructure is adequate for the projected demand. Departments: Community Development, Fire, Police, Public Works Related Policies: ERC-12.A, ERC-16.A, ERC-16.C, PSI-1.A, PSI-1.D, PSI-1.E, PSI-2.A, PSI-2.C, PSI-2.E, PSI-2.G, PSI-6.13, PSI-9.A, PSI-10.D, Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 8-66 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 61 PSI-P.18. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Require new development and reuse projects to submit plans to demonstrate compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, including but not limited to: • Mitigation of pollutant flows. • Limitation of impervious surfaces. • Preservation and usage of natural filtration systems such as wetlands and bioswales. • Provision of on-site infiltration and runoff, as well as temporary on-site retention areas. • Limitation of disturbance to natural bodies of water, drainage systems, and highly erodible areas. • Use of pollution prevention measures,source controls, and treatment strategies. • Implementation of erosion protection during and after construction. Department: Public Works,Community Development Related Policies: ERC-17.A, ERC-17.13, PSI-7.E Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Interjurisdictional Coordination PSI-P.19. Regional Coordination Coordinate with regional agencies, surrounding jurisdictions, and service providers on actions including: • Coordinating the installation or renovation of infrastructure to ensure compliance with regional plans and uninterrupted continuation of services across jurisdictional borders. • Maintaining an updated list of nonprofit organizations and interested parties, and ensuring they are included in planning decisions. • Working with state safety personnel to coordinate emergency response and safety efforts. Departments: Community Development, Public Works,City Manager's Office Related Policies: HAZ-9.13, HAZ-9.C, PSI-8.13 Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing r City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-67 PSI-P.20. School District Coordination Meet with local school districts to ensure continued coordination of maintenance and operations for the use of school facilities for public recreational activities, and the use of City parks for school educational purposes. Department:Community Services,City Manager's Office Related Policies: ERC-2.E, ERC-25, PSI-5.A, PSI-5.0 Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Public Information and Outreach PSI-P.21. Community-Based Crime Prevention Offer advice and support to community-based crime prevention efforts by neighborhood groups and civic organizations. Specific efforts may include, but are not limited to: • Advising and assisting neighborhoods in efforts to watch the homes of others and report suspicious activity to the police. • Providing crime prevention inspections of homes and businesses,including assessing CPTED principles which have been or could be implemented. Department: Police Related Policies: PSI-1.D, PSI-1.G, PSI-1.11 Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.22. Fire Safety Outreach Provide continuous education and outreach on fire safety through regular workshops, informational posts on City websites and social media, partnerships with schools and community groups, and development review requirements. Departments: Fire Related Policies: HAZ-4.13, HAZ-8.A Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 3 8-68 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) PSI—P.23. Recycling and Composting Outreach Require the regular distribution of information to all residences and businesses regarding the benefits and processes of recycling and composting through actions such as: • Posting signs at waste disposal locations in multifamily complexes and businesses directing users to the correct bin for waste disposal. • Providing public information regarding composting options for household, commercial, and public waste and exploring the feasibility of providing a curbside composting program. • Encouraging residents to donate or recycle surplus furniture, old electronics, clothing, and other household items rather than disposing of such materials in landfills. • Identifying which materials are disposed of incorrectly, and conducting focused outreach efforts to improve diversion rates of these materials. Departments: Public Works, Information Services Department Related Policies: PSI-9.D, PSI-95, PSI-9.1-1 Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.24. Expanded Library Programs Maximize the cultural, educational, and social capabilities of the library system by expanding services to underrepresented age and ability groups;enhancing and expanding online and digital services;and partnering with art centers, cultural groups, and historical societies. Departments: Library Services,Community Services Related Policies: PSI-3.A, PSI-3.13, PSI-3.C, PSI-3.D, PSI-4.D Funding Sources: General Fund, user fees Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.25. Marine Safety Outreach Develop a marine safety outreach program to educate the community on ocean surf line safety. Departments: Fire Related Policies: PSI-2.F Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 8-69 This page is intentionally left blank. s "�y �F< 8-70 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) Res. No. 2017-41 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on September 18, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: O'Connell, Semeta, Posey, Delgleize, Hardy, Brenden, NOES: None ABSENT: Peterson ABSTAIN: None /7 City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #2 Hunflonglon BeaChGE,Nr- A A i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN DRAFT May September 2017 City Council General Plan Advisory Committee Barbara Delgleize, Mayor Dianne Thompson Mike Posey, Mayor Pro Tempore John Ventimiglia Patrick Brenden, Council Member Roy Miller Jill Hardy, Council Member Jeff Coffman Billy O'Connell, Council Member Robert Schaaf Erik Peterson, Council Member Dan Kalmick Lyn"Semeta, Council Member Ed Pinchiff Planning Commission Kim Carr Connie Mandic, Chair John Scandura Bill Crowe, Vice-Chair Clem Dominguez Dan Kalmick, Commissioner Leslie Mayes John Scandura, Commissioner Jessica Budica Michael BGrant, Commissioner Robert Sternberg Pat Garcia, Commissioner Ed Kerins Alan Ray, Commissioner Bob Wentzel Tim Mulrenan Sue Taylor i Alan Walls ' Darrel P. Arnold City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft , September 2017) i HB -357- Item 10. - 35 Task Farces Pat Brenden Biological Resources Jack Kirkorn 4 Vic Leipzig Dave Pryor Christine Whitcraft Tim McCormack Kim Kolpin Hemal Patel Sustainability Gordon Smith Teresa Howe Greg Hickman Tom Bock Lyle Ausk Circulation Keeli Scott Lisack Dan Kalmick Sue Gordon Janis Mantini Kim Nicholson Mark Sheldon Barbara Delgleize Ed Mountford Kathy Millea David Cicerone Dan Kalmick Michelle Schuetz Mike Posey Market Trends Pat Brenden John Ventimiglia John McGovern Tony Smale Philip Eddins Brett Barnes Steve Dodge City Staff Tom Grable Fred Wilson, City Manager Shawn Millbern Scott Hess, AICP. Community Development Sea Level Rise Director Robert Schaff Jennifer Villasenor, Planning Manager Hemal Patel Gordon Smith Consultants to the City Jack Kirkorn Michael Baker International Wes Warvi In association with: Mike Van Voorhis Atkins Global Robert Thompson Moffatt& Nichol Mark Bixby Stantec Ed Pinchiff Stanley R. Hoffman Associates Jennifer Thomas Matrix Consulting Group ii City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 36 HB -358- Internally consistent. The general plan must fully integrate its separate parts and relate them to each other without conflict. All adopted portions of the general plan have equal weight, whether required by state law or not. Long range. State law requires every general plan take a long-term perspective since anticipated development will affect the city and the people who live or work here into the foreseeable future. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)ISustainable Communities Strategy: Towards a Sustainable Future provides a comprehensive outline of the regional vision for transportation investments in Southern California through 2040. The RTP was adopted in 2017 and is updated every four years to address regional transportation needs.The General Plan mus should be consistent with these regional planning efforts. California Environmental Quality Act The state legislature adopted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in response to a public mandate for thorough environmental analysis of projects that could affect the environment. The provisions of the law and environmental review procedures are described in the CEQA Statutes and Guidelines (Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21189). A separate Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the General Plan is the instrument for ensuring that environmental impacts of the plan are appropriately assessed and mitigated. Huntington each Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance The City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (Huntington Beach Municipal Code Title 20—Title 25) is the primary implementation tool for the General Plan. The Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance consists of two parts: the official Zoning Map divides the city into zones consistent with General Plan land use designations, and zoning text establishes development standards for each zone including permitted uses, density and intensity of uses, building height, performance standards, and other similar regulations. California Coastal Act The California Coastal Act (California State Public Resources Code, Division 20, Section 30000 et seq.) directs each local government lying wholly or partly within the coastal zone, as defined by the Coastal Act, to prepare a Local Coastal Program for its portion of the 1-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) H13 -359- Item 10. - 37 In some areas of Huntington Beach, intensity and density are regulated by development and design standards rather than FAR limits. These standards, sometimes referenced as form-based codes, may include specifications for setbacks (how far a building may be situated from a street or sidewalk), limits on building height and massing (e.g., size and shape), and requirements to include open space, among others. These standards apply to properties within the planning areas of specific plans, which establish these standards when they are adopted. The maximum allowable development on any individual parcel is governed by the maximum measure of density or intensity permitted for that land use designation applied to the parcel. The General Plan uses these measurements to establish development capacity for each individual parcel and for the planning area at large. The planned (and actual) density or intensity on a parcel is usually less than the maximum, and is influenced by the physical characteristics of a parcel, access and infrastructure limitations, compatibility with other nearby uses, market factors, and past development trends. Use Characteristics Use characteristics refer to the intended character and development pattern of, and uses associated with, a parcel of land. The General Plan uses these use characteristics to classify buildings with similar characteristics into land use designations. To maintain compatible development on and between sites and within neighborhoods, overlay areas, and other defined areas, use characteristics for each designation are intentionally limited. Distribution of Existing Uses Existing land uses in Huntington Beach include a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, mixed use, parks, open space(e.g.,wetlands, beaches), oil-related-uses, and public uses. According to a 2014 land use survey, residential development is the predominant use in the city; housing uses constitute about 4�5 43 percent of all land uses in the planning area. Public uses, primarily comprising public rights-of-way, occupy an additional 43-28 percent of the planning area. Open space, commercial, and industrial development occupies most of the remainder of the planning area. Character of Change Change is a constant process observed over a specified time frame. Between now and 2040, Huntington Beach expects a certain continuing level of change resulting from a number of forces such as population growth, changing demographics, the need to replace aging buildings and improve existing homes, and an ever-changing economy. Physical changes are guided by new development that almost exclusively occurs through private forces based on market demand. The goals and policies provided in this element address areas and locations that would be best suited to accommodate transformational change that supports the Community Vision established in the General Plan. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, Setpember 2017) 2-5 Item 10. - 38 HB -360_ 0�®11 Mixed-Use Building FAR range and residential densities are established k per specific plan and shown on the Land Use Map for specific areas. The Mixed-Use designation provides for any t ° combination of commercial uses; offices; attached Q single-family housing, multiple-family housing, and live- L= work units; institutional uses; cultural facilities; developments including an open space component; and/or civic facilities. Mixing of these uses may occur in a vertical and/or horizontal orientation. Maximum FAR and residential density standards are established within individual specific plan areas. For some specific plans, FAR and density are not prescribed for individual properties or developments. In these cases, the overlaying specific plan includes a maximum development capacity for each land use. Industrial Designations Two land use designations accommodate industrial development in Huntington Beach. To ensure that the city is well positioned for future prosperity, these designations continue to provide jobs in established industries, while also supporting new employment opportunities that accompany emerging technologies and the redevelopment of transitioning industrial areas. One designation accommodates a diverse mix of nonresidential uses. The other accommodates a range of industrial uses that have historically characterized established industrial areas. Research and Technology FAR range: up to 1.Q i The Research and Technology designation provides for 4 a wide variety of nonresidential mixed-use development ,s in industrial areas that are undergoing or poised for transformation to support changing employment demand. The designation encourages both employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees while continuing. to allow traditional industrial uses such as manufacturing and production. Uses include clean and green manufacturing (e.g., medical devices, solar panels), research and development, technology, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, limited eating and drinking establishments that have an industrial component(e.g., a brewery), restaurants and cafes to accommodate employment uses and surrounding residential neighborhoods enteFtainment, and similar neighborhood commercial uses. 2-12 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) xB -361- Item 10. - 39 Yj Community Subareas In addition to the specific plans identified throughout the planning area, the General Plan also identifies a number of community subareas (Figure LU-4), which are intended to supplement density/intensity standards, use characteristics, and urban design goals and policies provided in this element beyond the guidance offered by the land use - designations. Each community subarea has been identified to further the economic goals and guiding principles of the City and to enhance areas where reinvestment or improvements are proposed during the life of the General Plan, but require additional consideration due to their locations and/or environmental setting.Although some subareas are contained partially or wholly within a specific plan, the description and goals of the subareas in this General Plan do not conflict with the respective specific plans. The following subareas have been identified through the General Plan process or carried over from the previous General Plan. Intersection Enhancement Subareas The following four community subareas represent opportunities to improve neighborhood gateways and commercial corridors within the planning area. Subarea 1: Beach/Wamer Intersection Enhancement Encompassing the four corners of the Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue intersection, within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, this 27-acre subarea is designated Mixed-Use and surrounded by Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Medium High Density Residential, General Commercial, Mixed-Use, and Public uses.The subarea includes buildings of varying scales and architectural styles. The built environment and streetscapes lack a cohesive style. The predominant uses are retail stores, a gas station, a drug store, a car wash, and the 14-story Ocean Tower. The intersection is the subarea's defining feature. Subarea 2: BrookhurstlAdams Intersection Enhancement Encompassing the four corners of the Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue intersection, this subarea includes 58 acres of commercial use. Surrounded by low-density residential uses to the south and medium high-density residential uses to the north, each comer contains a variety of commercial uses within individual developments. This subarea is characterized by large parking lots separated from the main roadways by landscape buffers. Strip retail and/or large format retailers are located behind the parking areas, and small pad retail buildings are dispersed within portions of the developments. The buildings generally maintain a low profile and the built environment and streetscapes l lack a cohesive identity. Existing uses include banks, restaurants, a grocery store, a drugstore, and several small commercial service businesses. Both streets are wide and carry a large volume of traffic through the subarea. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-17 Item 10. - 40 HB -362- Technology and Innovation Subareas Subarea 5: Gothard Street Centrally located along Gothard Street between Edinger Avenue and Ellis Avenue, the 422-acre Gothard Street Subarea consists of both industrial and research and technology uses, along with a few isolated community service and public use parcels. The subarea is predominantly surrounded by residential development of varying density and character to the east and south, areas identified for mixed commercial and residential development to the north along Edinger Avenue, and Ocean View High School and Central Park to the west. The eastern edge of the subarea abuts the Oak View neighborhood. The Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right-of-way runs just east of the Gothard Street Subarea, extending from the northern city limits to its endpoint just north of Garfield Avenue. The Gothard Street Subarea is predominantly occupied by smaller manufacturing and warehouse uses and auto repair facilities. Other uses include a lumberyard, some retail and office uses, fib—Republic EftiF,.Rffient ' Services, several gyms/training facilities, Seabreeze Church, and City facilities. The built environment consists of small industrial buildings, isolated offices, and a few industrial parks. Incompatibilities between existing industrial uses in the subarea and residential uses in the Oak View neighborhood present existing environmental justice concerns, as expressed by community members. Given the proximity to residential uses and Ocean View High School, the potential for land use compatibility and environmental justice issues associated with typical industrial use remains an ongoing concern. The City has also designated the abandoned portion of the UPRR rail corridor south of Ellis Avenue for a future transportation corridor use. Potential uses include development of a bicycle or multipurpose trail or an exclusive transit corridor. To support economic development goals to attract new incubator and technology-oriented uses, this subarea introduces the Research and Technology land use designation along with the existing Industrial designation to promote opportunities for new industrial uses that are generally greener, lighter, more mixed with commercial, and more compatible with surrounding sensitive uses. Similar to the Northwest Industrial Subarea, this subarea uses the Research and Technology designation to provide a flexible platform for both industrial and commercial uses that do not fit into the city's historically commercial or industrial areas. While the average building intensity of research and technology use is anticipated to be higher than that of traditional industrial use, the processes and operations of such uses are intended to have fewer potential air quality and noise impacts on surrounding sensitive uses than conventional industrial activities. The maximum development intensity for uses in this subarea ranges from 0.75 FAR for traditional industrial uses to 1.0 FAR for proposed research and technology uses. 2-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -363- Item 10. - 41. t� Subarea 6: Northwest Industrial The 760-acre Northwest Industrial Subarea is located in the northwestern portion of the planning area. Comprising the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan north of Bolsa Avenue and industrial and research and technology uses south of Bolsa Avenue, the subarea is surrounded by residential uses to the north, south, and east, and is bordered by the City of Seal Beach to the west and by-Interstate 405 and commercial developments to the east and north. This subarea is anchored by two of Huntington Beach's largest employers (Boeing and C&D/Zodiac Aerospace), as well as a variety of industrial,technology, commercial service, and fitness uses.The built environment ranges from large office buildings and business parks to small commercial pad and industrial spec buildings. Given the proximity to residential uses,the potential for land use compatibility issues within typical industrial uses is a major concern. As a result, this subarea introduces the Research and Technology land use designation in areas adjacent to single-family residential neighborhoods to promote opportunities for new industrial uses that are more compatible with surrounding sensitive uses. The Research and Technology designation provides a flexible platform for both industrial and commercial uses that do not fit into the city's historically commercial or industrial areas. Many new business types require this flexibility as they may need both commercial and industrial components to conduct business.As a result,the Research and Technology designation is a catalyst to spur employment growth and change within this opportunity area, reinforcing the City's desire to meet current and future needs and spur economic growth. The maximum development intensity for uses in this subarea ranges from 0.75 FAR for traditional industrial uses to 1.0 FAR for proposed research and technology uses. Pacific Coast Highway Coastal Corridor Subareas These subareas intend to preserve and enhance the recreational character of the Pacific Coast Highway coastal corridor through the expansion of visitor-serving uses and maintenance of open spaces and recreational opportunities. The intent is to establish distinct commercial nodes, residential communities, and open spaces along its length. Subarea 7: Open Space— Shore The shoreline along Pacific Coast Highway is an amenity that requires a careful balance of preservation and enhancement of the recreational character through the expansion of visitor-serving uses and maintenance/improvement of open spaces and recreational opportunities consistent with policies and programs identified in the Coastal Element. No modifications to development intensities or use characteristics are proposed, However, ' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-21 Item 10. - 42 HB -364- General Plan ist0buti n of Land Uses _aa a e 4 Residential Low Density 6,c�5.666.3 29.8% Medium Density 1,184.6 6.2% Medium High Density 1,047.61.034.4 5.5% High Density 180.7 0.95% Commercial Neighborhood 90.9 0.48% General 296.9 1.6% - Visitor 165.7 0.9% Office 16.3 0.1% Mixed Use- Mixed Use 637.9 3.4% Industrial Research and Technology 473.2 2.5% Industrial 654.6 3.5% Open Space and Recreational Conservation 1,661.9 8.8% Park 701.1 3.7% Recreation _ 237.8 1.3% Water Recreation - 238.7 1.3% Shore 434.3 Public and and Community Service Public 835.7 4.4% ._.............._..._ Public-Semipublic 779.2 4.1% Rights-of-Way 3,681.5 19.4% Total --_- 18,971.8* 100% Source:City of Huntington Beach *Totals may not add up due to rounding Development Capacity Table LU-2 identifies the development capacity associated with the planned distribution of land uses described in this element and summarizes the land use distribution and the resulting residential and nonresidential levels of development that can be expected from implementation of land use policies established by the General Plan. As the density and intensity standards for each land use designation are applied to future development projects and land use decisions, properties will gradually transition from one use to another, and land uses and intensities will gradually shift to align with the intent of this Land Use Element. 2-24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) FIB -365- Item 10. - 43 s Table LU-2 Ger°teral Plan Development Capacity a Residential 8,066.0 85,360 — Commercial 1,2D7.7 4321 18,442,316 Industrial 1,127.8 — 24,149,404 Open Space& Recreational 3,273.8 — 1,734,283 Public & Rights-of-Way — — -5,296.4 _ — E 6,084,987 Total (2040) 18,971.8* 85,403 50,410,990 Existing (2014)Totals 18,971.8" 78,175 45,026,070 Change, 2014-2040 — 7,228 5,384,920 Source:City of Huntington Beach Notes: Totals may not add up due to rounding 1.2040 populaWn estimate based on the p"Gtions prepared for the draft GGRR This oaloulawn assumed a 20! eats of 5 years). the Orange Goun4,gro�,Ab Fate�s expected to slow ever Ame. 2 Residential units located in the General Commercial designation represent existing residential units on land designated for a range of nonresidential uses where no land use change is anticipated. The Land Use Element does not directly specify a maximum population for Huntington Beach. The maximum possible number of residential units is determined by the different maximum densities allowed for each land use designation and the amount of land area with that designation. However, this maximum number of units is unlikely to be reached because every residential parcel in Huntington Beach would need to be developed to its maximum potential. Because most of the planning area is built out and existing buildings are generally in good condition, these changes will primarily occur within the "transform" areas identified in Figure LU-1. Forecasting assumptions are used to determine the realistic expected number of residential units that Huntington Beach will have when all of the parcels that are reasonably expected to redevelop have already done so. I l City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-25 Item 10. - 44 HB -366- E for new development to help meet these goals. These opportunity areas were identified because they either have significant concentrations of existing employment, or have future economic growth potential. The City could provide incentives to retain, expand, and capture new businesses, including research and development industries and start-ups. The City should also update the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to ensure that development regulations and land use controls reflect the City's economic development goals. Research and Technology Uses When assessing Huntington Beach's location, employment, and land use potential, technology manufacturing and technology services industries present high potential for growth. A Research and Technology land use designation within the Northwest Industrial Subarea and the Gothard Street Subarea will accommodate these types of future uses. This designation provides for a wide variety of nonresidential mixed-use development and encourages both employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees while continuing,to allow traditional industrial uses such as manufacturing and production. Uses may include clean and green manufacturing and industrial uses (e.g., medical devices, clean air technology), research and development uses, technology, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, limited eating and drinking establishments that have an industrial component(e.g., a brewery), restaurants and cafes to accommodate #ie—employment uses and surrounding residential neighborhoods, ent .t :mfflent, and similar neighborhood commercial uses. Technology firms will demand newer or refurbished multi-tenant buildings that offer modern, high speed and high bandwidth infrastructure. Therefore, the City will also focus on encouraging developingment of a strong inventory of adequately improved and competitive industrial buildings within these districts that provide the resources and technological capacity desired by businesses in this industry. Infrastructure Along with bandwidth in facilities, adequate infrastructure across all services is also important to support new industry growth. The City must invest in water, sewer, drainage, street, and other infrastructure updates to serve future generations of residents, businesses, and visitors. There is much to be done to achieve long-term fiscal stability and to bring public services and capital infrastructure back to acceptable levels, which were impacted by the economic recession and loss of redevelopment funding. 1 The City will continue to maintain and expand its Capital Projects Reserve for the repair i1 T1, and construction of city infrastructure. New infrastructure projects will be coordinated using a comprehensive systems approach that balances serving existing community members and provides adequate capacity for future growth. 2-30 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -367- Item 10. - 45 Quality of Life Huntington Beach currently has an excellent quality of life. Its desirable residential neighborhoods, world-class beaches and recreation areas, and safe environment all contribute to a city that is a great place to live, work, and play. Improving the jobs-housing balance by planning for a range of housing types in appropriate focus areas in conjunction with industrial and commercial expansion is a key component of ensuring and maintaining the city's quality of life. Fiscal Responsibility Without redevelopment, new, creative, and innovative ideas to stimulate business and development will have to be implemented. Resolving these issues and many others will influence the level of net revenues that the City will have available to fund enhanced levels of service and to maintain and build new infrastructure necessary to support a strong, vibrant economy. General Fund costs will now be subject to a fiscal impact analysis since they are so important to the fiscal health of the community. As part of this plan, the economic development recommendations will be tested using a fiscal impact model to provide guidance in the development of effective land use goals and policies that facilitate a strong local economy and long-term fiscal stability.As economic recovery is vulnerable to global, national, and state forces beyond the City's control, the City is committed to continue on the path of fiscal conservatism. Tourism and Hospitality An estimated 30 percent of jobs in Huntington Beach are tourism-based. Tourism is one of the city's competitive economic advantages, and continuing to foster the health of this sector is important to the overall strength and diversity of the city's economy. With over 10 miles of contiguous, accessible coastline, Huntington Beach hosts elf millions of visitors annually. Many of these visitors stay in one of the city's nearly 2,000 hotel and motel rooms, most of which are located along the coast. However, the current level of demand for overnight accommodations is not fully met within the city, leading to economic leakage and lost tax revenues. Therefore, identifying prime locations along the coastline as well as in other areas that provide a high-quality visitor experience remains an economic development priority. The City will continue to work with existing and future operators to update or expand existing overnight accommodations and visitor-serving facilities, and develop new accommodations and facilities to meet future demands. To complement this strategy, the City will also continue to expand and enhance natural resources, open spaces, andI recreation amenities to retain or improve its position among the top tourism destinations in Southern California. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-31 Item 10. - 46 HB -368- ii Land Ese and Man Design Issues, Goals, and Policies The land use and urban design issues addressed in this element include: • Coordinating development patterns and protecting community character • Addressing interactions between neighborhoods and nonresidential attractions • Providing a range of well-maintained housing types • Protecting and adaptively reusing industrial areas • Maintaining flexible long-term school capacity • Fostering the identity of individual neighborhoods and community subareas • Maintaining historic character and architectural diversity in Downtown Coordinating Development Patterns and Protecting Community Character Much of the planning area has been developed, and many of the remaining undeveloped parcels are committed to development by specific plans and development agreements, or are preserved for open space. Consequently the fundamental patterns, distribution, and form of development has been established. However, protecting the traditional beach and the successful "Surf City" brand and feel of Huntington Beach is a community priority. Continuing to preserve historic and cultural resources related to that "Surf City" identity, such as older neighborhoods.L-and-historic buildings, strictures, and monuments: Native American, pioneer settlement, agricultural development; and historical periods including prehistory settlements,trading with Catalina. Civil War, World Wars, veterans'history etc., is an important step in retaining Huntington Beach's unique culture. Goal LU-1. New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policies A. Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. B. Ensure new development supports the protection and maintenance of environmental and q� open space resources. C_Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. 2-32 City of Huntington Beach General Plan(Draft, September 2017) HB -369- Item 10. - 47 G-D. Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale, and character to complement adjoining uses. Goal LU-2. New development preserves and enhances a distinct Surf City identity, culture, and character in neighborhoods, corridors, and centers. Policies A. Ensure that new development and reuse projects protect existing Surf City culture and identity and preserve and recognize unique neighborhoods and areas as the building blocks of the community. B. Ensure that new and renovated structures and building architecture and site design are context-sensitive, creative, complementary of the city's beach culture, and compatible with surrounding development and public spaces. C. Distinguish neighborhoods and subareas by character and appearance and strengthen physical and visual distinction, architecture, edge and entry treatment, landscape, streetscape, and other elements. Evaluate the potential for enhancement of neighborhood entrances and perimeter walls. D. Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. E. Intensify the use and strengthen the role of public art, architecture, landscaping, site design, and development patterns to enhance the visual image of Huntington Beach. Addressing Interactions Between Neighborhoods and Attractions Huntington Beach contains several well-defined places characterized by community activity and a high level of identity. These include the pedestrian-oriented Downtown area, the beach, Central Park(the city's primary recreation and cultural center),the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, neighborhoods such as Huntington Harbour and Sunset Beach, and the comparatively new Bella Terra area. Most other areas have developed as principally auto- oriented environments that pose a challenge for neighborhood interactions. Future planning should provide multiple ways for neighborhoods and attractions to interact through non-auto travel modes, drawing on existing and expanded bicycle and pedestrian facilities as well as enhanced transit facilities. Goal LU-3. Neighborhoods and attractions are connected and accessible to all residents, employees, and visitors. Policies A. Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-33 Item 10. - 48 1113 -370- Goal LU-5. Industrial businesses provide employment opportunities for residents, supporting the local economy. Policies A. Support and attract new businesses in the city's industrial areas. B. Encourage clean, less intensive industrial development in areas identified in the planning area. C. Ensure proposed development and uses in industrial areas contribute to the City's economic development objectives and do not minimize existing uses. D. Explore opportunities to optimize use of underutilized or underperforming industrial land that is sensitive to surrounding uses, and to introduce new industrial uses that create jobs and housing. E. Encourage and assist existing and potential industrial owners to update, modernize, and expand their industrial properties. Maintaining Flexible Long-Term School Capacity Much of Huntington Beach was built during a time when demand for school facilities was high to accommodate the needs of the post-World War II baby boom. Today, demand for school facilities is experiencing a relative decline. Some schools in Huntington Beach are at or above capacity while others are under capacity depending on the school or district. Short-term demand for residential, commercial, and open space uses is competing with the ability to retain these sites for longer-term school use. Nonoperational schools are being leased for other uses, while other schools are overcrowded. Goal LU-6. Neighborhood school eik sites adapt over time to meet the changing needs of the community. Policies A. Consistent with state Law, explor alternatives with school districts for that exie public benefit and access to recreation and open spaces as well as other uses for surplus feF futwite use ef school fae ies is tes should a closure occur. B. Continue to consult with school districts in connection with any may,-related or school district---related> g planning and environmental review of proposed non-education surplus school site feuse-projects. C. In consultation with school districts.- and consistent with state law, encourage SertsideF flexible interim use options to maximize existing use of school speeessites while eeeemtt� +r addressing future community and sehealneeds. i City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-35 HB -3 7 1- Item 10. - 49 Policies A. Reinforce Downtown as the city's historic center and as a pedestrian and bicycle-oriented village with commercial, entertainment,and recreation uses to meet the needs of residents and visitors. B. Encourage development of underused parcels with a mix of uses and unique architecture. C. Ensure new development reflects the Downtown's historical structures and theme. D. Reinforce the unique Downtown character and visual distinctions, architecture, and streetscape. ECOHOMIC Development Issues, Goals, and Policies The economic development issues addressed in this element include: • Capitalizing on location with technology infrastructure • Retaining, expanding, and capturing businesses • Capturing sales tax revenues • Encouraging renovation and revitalization of commercial and industrial areas • Adapting to a changing economy • Enhancing tourism, hospitality, and the high tech industry Capitalizing on Location with Technology infrastructure The City must continue to capitalize on its location and reputation as an advantageous and competitive business location by encoraging_expandit�gsion of state-of-the-art technology infrastructure related to communications, media, and computing systems that existing and new businesses can cost-effectively use. Goat LU-9. Industrial uses provide job opportunities for existing and future residents, as well as the surrounding region, while generating revenue for the citk Policies A. Establish technology or innovation districts, such as the Gothard Street Subarea and the Northwest Industrial Subarea, where technology infrastructure is provided specifically to support existing and new businesses. B. Support the provision of Pfevide--technology infrastructure and services to supply necessary technological and communication tools for existing and new industry and businesses. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-37 Item 10. - 50 KB -372- sr. C. Provide opportunities for new startup businesses to develop innovative products and services in a business incubator environment. D. Support the ability for future industrial uses to accommodate new flexible work programs and sehedw'es. Retaining, Expanding, and Capturing Businesses The city's business sector includes a sizable share of research, development, and start- up businesses. However, there is an opportunity to attract more of these businesses to locate within the city and thrive, thus increasing the average wage rate of workers and improving the jobs-housing balance. Largely concentrated in the Northwest Industrial Subarea and the Gothard Street Subarea, most of these jobs are associated with technology manufacturing or technology services. Goal LU-10. The City aggressively retains and enhances existing industrial businesses and technology businesses while attracting new firms to the cify. Policies A. Provide incentives to retain, expand, and capture new businesses, including research and development industries and start-ups. B. Promote the creation of jobs with increasing wage opportunities within the community. C. In partnership with regional, state, and federal agencies, provide workforce programs that facilitate workforce diversity in the city through expanded labor force training and hiring practices. D. Maximize the economic development services provided by the City to existing and prospective businesses and industries ete:). Capturing Sales Tax Revenues The City must monitor taxable sales trends by key locations and work to reverse leakage trends in retail sales, with the objective of recapturing sales tax revenues that are leaving the city, by promoting targeted development and expansion of commercial uses that serve Huntington Beach and the surrounding region. Goal LU-11. Commercial land uses provide goods and services to meet regional and local needs. Policies A. Encourage a variety of commercial uses that cater to local and regional demand to create an environment that meets resident needs and increases the capture of sales tax revenues. 2-38 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -373- Item 10. - 51 MsAN�I B. Encourage new businesses to locate on existing vacant or underutilized commercial properties where these properties have good locations and accessibility. C. Maximize the economic development services provided by the City to existing and prospective businesses and industries , ete-.J. Encouraging Renovation and Revitalization of Commercial and Industrial Areas There is a marked difference in development quality and property maintenance between older commercial/industrial corridors and newer commercial/industrial and mixed-use centers. Goal LU-12. Commercial and industrial corridors throughout the planning area are renovated and revitalized. Policies A. Establish in the Urban Design Guidelines that nonresidential buildings and sites be designed to be consistent with and use low-impact design techniques. B. Encourage renovation and revitalization of deteriorating and struggling nonresidential areas and corridors, particularly commercial locations. C. Expand shuttle services and pedestrian linkages between adjoining business areas, particularly along the coast, where a greater flow of local shoppers and visitors is encouraged. D. Seek opportunities to encourage the creation of business improvement districts or other economic development strategies where coordination and financing of mutually shared, enhanced services can increase business potential for all. Adapting to a Changing Economy As with the oil industry in the early 20th century, many new industries are getting their start in Huntington Beach in the 21st century. However, in the past decade, the way businesses operate has changed. Employees are looking for alternatives to long commutes, employers are considering ways to attract new talent, and communities desire greater workforce diversity. Goal LU-13. The city provides opportunities for new businesses and employees to ensure a high quality of life and thriving industry Policies 1 A. Encourage expansion of the range of goods and services provided to accommodate the needs of all residents and the market area. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 2-39 Item 10. - 52 HB -374- B. Capture emerging industries such as, but not limited to, 'knowledge"-based industries and research and development firms. C. Support development of new commercial and industrial projects and retrofits of existing buildings. D_Improve transit and other alternative transportation options, including shuttles and safe bicycle routes,for employees who live and work in the community. 9-.E. Do not preclude future mobility technologies in land use planning. Enhancing Tourism and Hospitality Anchored by the beach, Pier, natural resources, and cultural amenities, Huntington Beach is a world-renowned tourist destination. Annual events like the US Open of Surfing and Surf City Half Marathon draw hundreds of thousands of visitors. Huntington Beach is also enjoying an increase in conventions and meetings, and has expanded the number of available hotel rooms along Pacific Coast Highway. A limited number of other lower-cost lodging options are available, and ongoing provision of a variety of lodging options to ensure visitors of all income levels can enjoy the coast is a top priority of the Coastal Act. A healthy tourist and hospitality economy also requires a robust service economy. Goa! LU-14. Huntington Beach continues to attract visitors and provides a variety of attractions and accommodations during their stay. Policies A. Encourage expansion of the range and location of available lodging for both tourist and business visitors. B. Encourage both coastal and inland visitor-serving uses to offer a wide spectrum of opportunities for residents and visitors. C. Improve the availability of affordable housing and accessible transportation options for service workers. D_Facilitate the provision of transit and bicycling linkages between the various tourist destinations which help encourage local residents and visitors to minimize the use of automobiles. 9-.E Support a concert/entertainment venue within the Gcity 2-40 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -375- Item 10. - 53 �� 0��n �� 0U� �.�� The circulation issues addressed in this element include: " Maintaining adequate level of service ° Providing adequate Downtown and beach parking ^ Enhancing regional transit w Increasing local transit options * Ensuring mobility options for all users * Enhancing bicycle, pedestrian, equestrian, and waterway options * Protecting and developing scenic corridors * Providing for alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure w Ensuring access for emergency vehicles Maintaining Adequate Level of Service While the City has generally maintained adequate levels of service over time, congestion occurs Gtsome key intersections and on several arterial roadways during commute hours, on the weekends, and during the tourist season. The City does not control operations on some roadways, such as Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, as they are under CG|tnanS jurisdiction. Maintaining adequate |ava|o of service enhances quality of life for Huntington Beach reoidento, promotes traffic safety, and improves the ability of emergency service providers to respond to emergency situations. land uses while maintaininct a desired level of service and capacity on streets and at critical intersections. Goal CIRC-1b. The iMplementation of citDmi:de systems and driver aRplications, such as vehicle detection, traffic signal coordination, collision avoidance systems, traffic calming measures, and emergency or traffic notification systems, creates a Goal CIRC-1a. The circulation system supports existing, aRi2roved, and planned quality circulation system. Goal CIRC-1c. Through ongoing evaluation of jurisdiction, efficient transportation management provides the highest level of safety, service, and resources. Policies A. Develop and maintain the city street network and pursue completion of missing roadway ' links identified on the Arterial Highway Plan (Figure CIRC-2) and standard roadway cross City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Dneft. Septembert2O17) \ / 3-28 TfeD] 10_ - 54 |{B -37h- 0 O-0 sections (Figure CIRC-1), including appropriate roadway widths, medians, and bicycle lanes_ B. Maintain the following adopted performance standards for citywide level of service for r 4 traffic-signal-controlled intersections during peak hours. a. Locations with specific characteristics identified as critical intersections: LOS E (ICU to not exceed 1.00) b. Principal Intersections: LOS D (0.81-0.90 ICU) a� c. Secondary Intersections: LOS C(0.71-0.80 ICU) C. Monitor the capacity of principal intersections. When principal intersections approach or have reached unacceptable levels of service, consider elevating the priority of Capital t � Improvement Program (CIP) projects that reduce traffic congestion at these intersections. - D. Require additional right-of-way and restrict parking on segments adjacent to principal ( ` intersections to allow for future intersection improvements and turning movements as needed to satisfy performance standards. a E. Maintain compliance with the OCTA Congestion Management Program or any subsequent i replacement program. F. Require development projects to provide circulation improvements to achieve stated City (a goals and to mitigate to the maximum extent feasible traffic impacts to adjacent land uses and neighborhoods as well as vehicular conflicts related to the project. G. Limit driveway access points, require driveways to be wide enough to accommodate traffic 'ma � flow from and to arterial roadways, and establish mechanisms to consolidate driveways M {, where feasible and necessary to minimize impacts to the smooth, efficient, and controlled ;j flow of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. �' )i H. Protect residential neighborhoods from adverse conditions associated with cut-through and nonresidential traffic. 1. Pursue technological innovations to erasure Huntington Beach -has the best available traffic management systems. J. L - lrlvestt ag to current jurisdictional control of roadways and determine where adjustments may be made in the future. Providing Adq o and c Parking � _ ( Parking can be a challenge in Downtown throughout the year, but especially during the high tourist season and special events. Street parking and Downtown parking structures are the current primary parking options, While drivers circulate looking for available 3-30 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) FIB -377- Item 10. - 55 o=e Ensuring Mobility Options for All Users F16Traditional circulation planning tends to focus on travel by cars, many times at the expense i of other modes of transportation, such as walking, biking, train, and transit. The Circulations Plan is intended to accommodate and encourage these other modes of travel. In addition to carrying traffic between destinations, streets are integral to neighborhoods and provide places for people to gather and recreate. The City's objective is to balance the many competing roles that streets play in the lives of residents, businesses, and visitors. _ Goal CtRC-5 The City's active transportation system integrates seamlessly with transit and vehicle circulation as part of a Complete Streets system. q Y Policies �` A. Maximize use of transportation demand management strategies to reduce total vehicle miles traveled and improve regional air quality. a �E B. Develop Complete Streets that create functional places meeting the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, wheelchair users, and motorists. Provide safe, accessible, and connected multimodal routes, especially along popular and arterial routes. C. Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions to ensure that bicycle routes connect to and are consistent with routes in adjacent jurisdictions. D. Maintain and repair bicycle lanes and sidewalks as necessary to expand use and safety. _ E. Improve citywide awareness of pedestrian and bicycle safety. r F_Include low-impact stormwater system design techniques in Complete Streets designs(i.e., natural stormwater retention basins, curb cuts to planter areas for stormwater � management)..-and : F-G, sSupport alternative fuel vehicles where feasible. Enhancing Bicycle, Pedestrian, Equestrian, and Waterway Options The existing development pattern in Huntington Beach limits the ability in some areas of the city to commute via bicycle or by walking, and could result in limiting access to goods, services, schools, and parks and recreation resources. It is generally considered challenging and unpleasant to cross or travel along major roadways as a bicyclist or `` pedestrian. Enhancements to the roadway system through Complete Streets serve the ° needs of all users equally and can increase the viability of bicycling and walking for both commute and local service trips. At the same time, some portions of Huntington Beach j (e.g., Downtown/Main Street) are dominated by pedestrians during the peak tourist season and would benefit from improvements that balance the needs of other users. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, Septembert 2017) 3-33 Item 10. - 56 HB -378- s-a Goal C1RC-7. Designated scenic corridors protect and enhance visual quality and scenic views. Policies A. Establish and implement landscape and urban streetscape design themes for landscape corridors, minor urban scenic corridors, and major urban scenic corridors that create a distinct character for each, enhancing each corridor's surrounding land uses. B. Require that any bridges, culverts, drainage ditches, retaining walls, and other ancillary scenic and landscape corridor elements be compatible and architecturally consistent with surrounding development and established design guidelines, to the greatest extent practicable. C. Require that slopes and earthen berms along scenic corridors be landscaped consistent with design objectives and standards. D. Provide landscaped medians and sidewalk treatments in accordance with City standards ,4 within major and primary arterial streets designated as landscape corridors, and continue to require the construction of landscaped medians and sidewalk treatments in new developments. �j E. Require that development projects adjacent to a designated scenic corridor include open spaces, plazas, gardens, and/or landscaping that enhance the corridor and create a buffer between the building site and the roadway. F. Continue to locate new and relocated utilities underground within scenic corridors to the greatest extent possible. All other utility features shall be placed and screened to minimize visibility. Providing for Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Infrastructure x=F Increasing the use of alternative fuels (e.g., natural gas, hydrogen, fuel cells) in traditional �i vehicles and increasing the use of electric vehicles represent important strategies to maintain mobility while reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Goal CIRC-8. Planning and infrastructure support electric and alternative fuel vehicles through Power or fueling stations and other means. Policies Set feFth speet'llealtsens te require vehiele pewer or alter-native fuel stations in n or substantially remodeled :to provide off-site eharging st-ations. 1 A. Encourage inclusion of power stations and alternative fuels at traditional gas stations. ' City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, Septembert 2017) 3-35 xB -379- Item 10. - 57 .=o B. Plan for conversion of all government fleet vehicles to alternative fuel or electricity. 4 :s, Ensuring Access for Emergency Vehicles 10.-. Ensuring the ability of the City's emergency services to respond to emergency situations is crucial to the community's public safety. Congestion may impede the ability of the City's emergency services to respond in a timely manner. It is important to implement new devices and programs to improve the ability of emergency personnel and vehicles to respond to calls for assistance and direct residents during emergencies. Goat CIRC-9 The circulation system is prepared for emergency vehicle response k, b reducing congestion or other roadway- and traffic-related im ediments which � JI g q. y- p can slow response times. r Policies A. Provide a circulation system that helps to meet emergency response time goals and incorporates technology infrastructure to clear intersections during emergency response events. B. Complete transportation improvements that assist in meeting the response goals for emergency services. C. Provide a system of primary, major, and secondary arterials that can be used for evacuating persons during emergencies or for ingress when emergency response units are needed. 7 ' r t 3-36 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 58 HB -380- P 2 3 esd NO JERVIromentait,4 comervation Im WORRY s s r m'... ^Ca ;_ - .,�'ai = tau ,• 4`� "�� t P Introduction Huntington Beach benefits tremendously from surrounding natural resources, which include City parks, wetlands, mineral resources, biological diversity, clean air and water, and the community's world-famous beach and shoreline. These resources contribute substantially to the local economy, provide rest and recreational opportunities, and help N,} support public health. In order to continue to benefit from these resources, Huntington Beach must protect and enhance them when possible while still allowing for economic N growth. G �., , enstiFing that they will eentinue te ben Li Scope and Content The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element establishes goals and policies to protect and conserve Huntington Beach's environmental resources, including open space and beaches, and addresses air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water quality, biological diversity, and mineral resources. Qj City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 4-1 HB -3 81- Item 10. - 59 Habitat Areas l �I Though most of Huntington Beach is urbanized, several open space areas remain that are � capable of supporting habitat for special-status species. These areas are managed by a variety of agencies and organizations that have different levels of jurisdiction and authority over the resources present. Several established habitat areas also support other uses requiring routine maintenance (e.g., beaches, parks). Table ERC-5 and Figure ERG-4 identify these areas and the organization(s) responsible for managing them. T abie EEC-5 Habitat Areas Within City Limits _ - California Department of Parks and Bolsa Chica State Beach 130 Recreation Brightwater Conservation Area 34 Brightwater Homeowners Association (includes 5-acre eucalyptus ESHA) Brightwater Environmental Protection Area 2 Brightwater Homeowners Association" . . - -- - - - Flood Control Channels 368 Orange County Flood Huntington Beach Wetlands 172" Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy Huntington City Beach (City Beach and 122 City of Huntington Beach -- Sunset Beach) Huntington Harbour and associated 253 City of Huntington Beach and Orange shorelines County Huntington State Beach 144 California Department of Parks and (includes Least TernNatural Preserve) Recreation Waterfront Wetland 3 City of Huntington Beach City parks and open spaces (includes open space areas, and parts of Central, 256 City of Huntington Beach ' Bartlett, and Norma Gibbs Parks) Seagate-created Wetland Area 5 Seagate Homeowners Association Shea Parkside Property ESHA 3 Future Homeowners Association Shea Parkside Property Wetlands/Buffer 16 Future Homeowners Association . ........... { Outside City Limits Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve (includes eucalyptus grove and Warner Pond 1,334 California Department of Fish and Wildlife OK ESHAs) _.-___._._._ _... .. __... .. ... ._. _ _ . _ Bolsa Chica Basin State Marine Conservation Area 450 California Fish and Game Commission .._... ----------- Bolsa Bay State Marine Conservation 45 California Fish and Game Commission Area Goodell Property 1 ( Property owner Unincorporated Open Space Areas 57 various agencies and organizations 'Huntington Beach Wetlands acreage includes Newland Marsh,which was owned by Cattrans at the time this plan was prepared. Presently the developer manages the Brightwater Conservation Area and Environmental Protection Area:the Brightwater HOA will ultimately take over this responsibility. Note:Acreages cannot be totaled,as several established habitat areas overlap. 4-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 60 HB -382- The City faces numerous key challenges to maintaining and protecting habitat including a complicated regulatory environment, numerous overlapping stakeholder groups, ecological degradation through water and air pollution, invasive pest plants, and changing climate conditions. This element establishes policies to collaboratively maintain, manage, and expand, when possible, important habitat lands, including the coast, wetlands, bay, and inland areas. Energy Resources Energy comes in numerous forms, OUR 4 u�a7 „ , including chemical fuels such as coal and eta oil, heat energy, and nuclear energy. This element focuses on electricity and natural 7-1 a as a form of chemical energy), which are two of the most common kinds of G � energy used in Huntington Beach. Electrical energy is used to run innumerable appliances, devices, and pieces of technology, including lights, computers, and air conditioners. It can also be used as a transportation fuel for electric vehicles. Natural gas can be used to generate electricity and to heat water and indoor spaces. Electricity in the planning area is supplied by Southern California Edison, while _ natural gas is supplied by the Southern California Gas Company. Table ERC-6 shows current and forecasted electricity and natural gas use in Huntington Beach. "abie f V,x�..n Ourrent. and Forea a sv d tMi OM Residential electricity 85,753,410 487,243,55 490,786,730 494,662,470 use (kWh) 4 Nonresidential electricity use (kWh) 726,213,200 703,114,370 743,073,060 791,265,320 Total electricity use (k ) 1,211,966,610 1,190,357,920 1,233 859,780 1 285,927,790 Residential natural gas use (therms) 31,156,530 30,363,590 30,735,350 131,796,430 ' Nonresidential natural gas use 9,328,020 10,210,450 ` 10,857,240 11,811,700 1 (therms) C Total natural gas use 40,484,550 40,574,040 41,592,590 43,608,120 (therms) Source:Southern Califomia Edison:Southern California Gas Company 1 2020 and 2040 values are projections without locally driven efforts to reduce energy use. 4.22\� City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -383- Item 10. - 61 area is generally located along the uplifted mesa north of Talbert Avenue, west of Beach Boulevard, and east of Huntington Harbour. Active mining no longer occurs at these sites, '. and new uses have been introduced, which deter future mining activities. Figure ERC-5 b" shows MRZ classifications within the Huntington Beach planning area. Water Resources T Water Supply ar The City provides water to over 50,000 service connections.T — i The Metropolitan Water District of Southern .�i California (Metropolitan) and;the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWD©C)_; � �� provide water to Huntington Beach. The �y City's water comes from a combination of groundwater (approximately three-fourths) and imported water resources (approximately one-fourth) purchased from Metropolitan through the MWDOC. Metropolitan's principal sources of water are the Colorado River and the Lake Oroville watershed in Northern California, and this water is treated at the � Robert B. Diemer Filtration Plant located north of Yorba Linda. The Orange County Water District (OCWD) manages the groundwater in the Orange Couniy Basin and allocates a proportion of that groundwater for Huntington Beach ` According to the City's 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, total water demand in Huntington Beach is forecasted to increase by roughly 8 percent from 2020 to 2040, with the increase being met using a combination of groundwater sources and imported water °w based on the OCWD-established Basin Pumping Percentage. Table ERC-7 identifies _ a expected planning area retail demands (i.e., the amount of water used by residential and nonresidential water customers, and unaccounted water loss) through 2040. 1� r .i,4.' i' cti at'Ji^3f "�l� JQ .e aYx-& Retail k €� Efn .. E �'•I� .��$' 1" f U'I'S r!y W.11 a€ l� �M�il n�M '�_ � �...... z. Total(AFY) 28,09Qt?,153 30„360 30, 52 30,396Ame Note:AFY=acre-feet per yearG ti��oF I_ As a result of recent drought conditions since 2012,water conservation efforts significantly reduced the city's water consumption from 2011 to 2015 by over 17 percent, from around MLA 30,000 acre-feet to around 25,000 acre-feet. �� T Orange County Water District's Groundwater Replenishment System Facility takes highly treated wastewater that would otherwise be discharged into the Pacific Ocean, further purifies it, and pumps it into seawater barriers and groundwater recharge basins. , City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 41-25 Item 10. - 62 H B -3 8 - able ER - 201go B,ailfoniia 031d' and TADL Priority r t Enterococci I Unknown Low 1....... I Indicator Bacteria Unknown Low. ...._.. X Chlordane Unknown I Low - X Copper Unknown Low _..... .. _._.._ X Lead Unknown Low X X' Nickel " Unknown Low X' pathogens j Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers Low M Dieldnn Unknown Low X X' X PCBs Unknown Low X X 1 Ammonia Unknown Low X I pH Unknown Low X X Sediment Toxicity Unknown ( Low X=Listed on the 2006 Clean WaterAct Section 303(d)List of Water Quality Limited ? =Listing made by US Environmental Protection Agency. 2=Priority determined by estimated TMDL completion data"listed in the State Water Resources Control Board's 2010 Integrated Report on Water Quality.AH pollutants and water bodies on this list have an estimated completion date of 2019 or later,indicating"low"priority. The City faces numerous water supply and water quality problems.Water supply concerns include continued groundwater overdraft conditions, future imported water costs and allocations, continuing drought conditions, State Water Resources Control Board water use reductions, and the financial and ecological costs associated with developing alternative supplies. Water quality issues include pollution associated with local and upstream urban runoff and sensitive ecological conditions. In this Environmental Resources and Conservation Element, the City addresses these issues with goals, policies, and programs that require water conservation, pursue recycled and alternative ' water resources, and reduce local water pollution in new and existing development. 4_28 City of Huntington Beach General Plan(Draft, September 2017) HB -385- Item 1.0. - 63 MINOR, Goal ERC 1 Adequately sized and located parks meet the changing recreational and leisure needs of existing and future residents. 1�R4 � Policies -£ A. Maintain or exceed the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, including the beach in the calculations. B. Seek opportunities to develop and acquire additional parks and open space in underserved areas where needed, including pocket (mini) parks, dog parks, athletic fields, = amphitheaters, gardens, and shared facilities. C. Distribute future developed park and recreational sites to equitably serve neighborhood and community needs while balancing budget constraints. 1i IS, D. Require all park improvement projects to consider ways to improve access to park facilities by foot and bicycle. E. Continue to locate future neighborhood parks adjacent to elementary schools with independent street frontage when possible. c F. Continue to balance and maintain a mix of recreational focused and passive and natural environment areas that preserve and protect special status species within open spaces. G. Develop a comprehensive trails network linking hiking, biking, and equestrian trails to parks, beaches, recreation facilities,and open spaces both within and outside the planning T area. H. Administer the City's open space program in a manner that supports lands, resources, and services provided in regional parks, open spaces, and conservation plans. Providing Recreation Programs and Services to Meet Community Needs "� The aging of the general population and resulting increases in the senior population will increase demand for senior services.The city's senior and elderly population would greatly benefit from additional and accessible social services to serve their needs. Meanwhile, - demand for programs for families, children, and other components of the community remain high. �m Goal ERC Z Diverse recreational and sports facilities provide active and - educational opportunities that meet the changing needs of residents and visitors of all ages. 4-30\ : , City of Huntington Beach General Plan(Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 64 HB -386- Policies A. Enhance and expand accessible and affordable recreation programs and sports facilities, providing new programs and adaptive facilities that respond to changing community demographics and needs. B. Ensure that buildings, equipment, fields, and other recreation amenities are in full use and capable of accommodating changing program demands. C. Partner with neighboring cities and the County to provide access to a wider range of �� recreational services. D. Encourage and coordinate with private commercial recreational businesses to provide recreational services and facilities that may not otherwise be offered by the City. E_Partner with school districts to offer after-hours recreational activities at both open and closed school sites. &F. Work with the school districts to encourage after school hours access to playgrounds and playing fields on school properties Managing the Beach, Parks, and e r ti to Accommodate Diverse Recreational Needs 9 `RT The beaches and adjacent marine environments provide habitat for numerous species, -� including federally listed birds that use the beach for nesting. While important biologically, coastal dunes, beach, the surf zone, and the off-shore areas are also recognized as important cultural amenities. Beach management practices should improve the sustainability of extensive recreational beach use while protecting sensitive natural resources. Goal ERC-3. Maintain the recreational and cultural identity of the beach while improving and enhancing the overall habitat value of coastal areas. Policies A. Maintain the beach and ocean as natural recreational resources, not only for the city but also for the Southern California region. B. Maintain the current high level of recreational access to the coast and its recreational facilities and continue to provide resources that improve accessibility to the beach for all _ users. C. Consider devoting certain portions of the beach to different preferred recreational uses while maintaining access for all users and meeting the recreation needs of both visitors and residents. D. In areas known to be utilized by special-status species, encourage low-intensity uses that provide public access and passive recreational resources such as picnic/observation areas, nature trails, peripheral bike paths, and informational signs/displays. / City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) �I 4-31 HB _387_ Item 10. - 65 Reducing Air Pollution Air quality in the South Coast Air Basin has generally been improving for a long period of time due to cleaner vehicles, technological advances, and increased regulatory oversight. _ Continued improvements in air quality will help improve public health and increase the overall quality of life in Huntington Beach. The community should work to support cleaner air while addressing challenges posed by population growth and climate change, which could stall or reverse these hard-fought gains in air quality. `A Goat ERC-4 Air quality in Huntington Beach continues to improve through local actions and interagency cooperation. Policies 9 A. Continue to cooperate with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and other regional, state, and national agencies to enforce air quality standards and improve air W quality. B. Continue to require construction projects to carry out best available air quality mitigation practices, including use of alternative fuel vehicles and equipment as feasible. C. Enforce maximum idling time regulations for off-road equipment. D. Require grading, landscaping, and construction activities to minimize dust while using as little water as possible. E_Continue to explore and implement strategies to minimize vehicle idling, including traffic signal synchronization and roundabouts. F Minimize exposure of sensitive land uses to toxic air contaminants by locating new pollutant sources away from sensitive uses and disproportionately affected communities and by encouraginc►e existing pollutant sources to reduce emissions when chances to existing operations or permits are proposed. .d: Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals k As there are numerous sources of GHG emissions, a variety of strategies are available to help local communities reduce these emissions. Establishing and meeting GHG emissions reduction goals will help to decrease the threat posed by climate change, while providing multiple benefits to Huntington Beach community members. Efforts to reduce GHG emissions can help save money for residents and businesses, enhance the local economy, improve public health, support improved air quality, and conserve water and other natural resources. The goals and policies below establish emissions reductions goals and create a high-level framework for GHG reduction efforts. Policies that support GHG emission reductions are located elsewhere in this element, as well as in the Circulation and Public Services and Infrastructure Elements. Specific strategies, anticipated reductions, and associated action items are addressed in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program. 4-32\ City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 66 HB -388- Goal ERC-6 Various agencies that oversee habitat areas and wildlife corridors, including but not limited to parks beaches coastal dunes marine waters, and wetlands coordinate decision-making and management to ensure ongoing protection of resources. Policies A. Create, improve, and/or acquire areas that enhance habitat resources and identify, prioritize, and restore as habitat key areas of land that link fragmented wildlife habitat, as funding and land are available. B. Support land acquisition, conservation easements, or other activities undertaken by landowners to create and preserve habitat linkages that support the integrity of ecosystems. C. Preserve and enhance the connection between the Huntington Beach Wetlands and the wetland/riparian area in Bartlett Park via the Huntington Beach Channel. D. Use future specific and area plans as a means to complete wildlife corridors. E.—R ccrrmmrmr the lrated-with-the-H �a F:E. Establish aquatic and terrestrial connections between the Bolsa Chica Wetlands and Central Park by restoring areas in the oil fields to a more natural environment. Protecting Habitat Resources in Wetlands Huntington Harbour, the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, the Huntington Beach Wetlands, the Talbert and Huntington Channels, and Anaheim Bay are used as spawning and nursery areas for a number of marine fishes, including important commercial fishes, and are utilized by threatened and endangered birds. Past development and the ongoing modifications to the Santa Ana River mouth and Huntington Beach Wetlands outlet have directly impacted areas through filling, dredging, and channelization. Urban runoff has also affected these areas. Stormwater runoff from streets with oil, grease, and trash is known to adversely impact marine biological resources and wetlands. Possible sea level rise also threatens to affect the stability of the wetlands. Goal ERC-7. Wetland areas that serve as important biological resources for threatened and endangered birds fish, and other species are protected and restored. 4-34 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -389- Item 10. - 67 7 Policies A. Protect important wetland areas in the planning area through land use regulation or through R non-profit land trust or public ownership and management. B. Maintain and enhance existing natural vegetation buffer areas surrounding riparian habitats and protect these areas from new development. l C. Support County efforts to designate and manage environmentally sensitive lands—such as the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, the Huntington Beach Wetlands, and lands near the mouth of the Santa Ana River and north of Newland Street—for inclusion into a coastal wetlands preserve. D. nor ' imize filling, dredging,and channelization of river and wetland areas other than ° necessary dredging to keep the tidal channel open. Eli E. Reduce pollutant runoff from new development and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable. F. Continue to evaluate and mitigate the effects of domestic and industrial wastes on living marine resources. ki G. Seek opportunities to naturalize flood channels while also enhancing flood protection capacity. Protecting Coastal Habitat Resources Coastal dunes, the beach, the surf zone, and offshore areas serve both important biological functions and as important recreational amenities. Coastal dunes have been reduced by urban development erosion and degradation and the intensification of beach ° uses. l Goal ERC 8 Coastal dunes and habitat resources remain resilient to potential impacts of encroaching development urban runoff, and possible sea level rise. Policies A. Sustain the biological productivity of coastal waters and maintain healthy populations of species of marine organisms adequate to support Long-term commercial, recreational, scientific, and educational purposes. B. Promote the improvement of tidal circulation in the Bolsa Chica Wetlands, Huntington Harbour, Huntington Beach Wetlands, and Anaheim Bay and minimize impacts to sand migration, aesthetics, and usability of the beach area. C. Prohibit development that jeopardizes or diminishes the integrity of sensitive or protected �p coastal plant and animal communities, accounting for expected changes from sea level t' U rise. city of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 4-35 Item 10. - 68 HB -390- Maintaining WaterQuaUitm Urban stormwater runoff occurs when rainfall is collected by storm drains instead of being absorbed by g/ouDdcoxer or soil kconnnnOnk/ seen in o nonurban environment). When it rains, traGh. Gi|t, automotive chemicals, fertilizers, animal wastes, and other contaminants are washed into the storm drain system. Since storm drains are designed only to carry stormwater,they are typically not equipped with filters or cleaning systems. Consequently, they can carry contaminants found in urban runoff directly into flood control channe|s, cpeekG, hverG, and the ocean. Many of the contaminants found in runoff affect water qua|ity, and can, at elevated |exe|G, be toxic to aquatic and marine life, Increased surface water runoff will likely result from new development and reuse projects and existing land uses in Huntington Beach, potentially degrading already polluted waters. Goal ERC-17. Enhance and protect water guality of all natural water bodies includinci rivers, creeks, harbors, wetlands, and the ocean. Policies A. Require redevelopment to comply with the Cdy'm National Pollutant Di charge Bin nation System permit and other regional pen-nits issued by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. B. Require that new development and significant redevelopment projects employ innovative and efficient drainage technologies that comply with federal and state water quality requirements and reduce runoff and water quality impacts to downstream environments. C. Continue to require new development and significant redevelopment projects to propose protective safeguards and implement best management practices that minimize non-point source pollution and runoff associated with construction activities and ongoing operations. D. Continue to require that new development and significant redevelopment projects incorporate low-impact development beat management praotioem, which may include infiltration, harvest and reuse,ef-evapotoansp[ration, and bio-treatment. E Prioritize investment in green etormwater infrastructure that restores natural landscapes before employing other management solutions, F Reduce pollutant runoff from new development to marine biological resources and wetlands by requiring the use of the most effective best management practices currently available, G� Partner with and provide information to community organizmtionu, community mambens, and businesses regarding best practices to minimize runoff and improve groundwater recharge. H^_Reduoe impacts of new development and significant redevelopment project sites' hydrologic regime(hydnomodification). :I �+-J. Continue working with the Cgunty and the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB) on the Integrated Regional Wa Aer..Quality Management Plan to explore and expand more regional treatment of stormwater runoff, 4'40\ / City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft. September 2Ol7) \� HB -39| TfeDl lO_ - 69 Tsunamis are an important hazard of concern for Huntington Beach, with the ability to impact the entire length of coastline in the planning area, Tsunamis are often caused by earthquakes occurring below or near the ocean Ooor, although underwater volcanic eruptions and landslides can also generate these waves. OEM Tsunamis can travel vast distances, and are capable of causing damage far away from the site of event that generated them. Huntington Beach may be affected by o tsunami caused by a local event, or by an event thousands of miles away elsewhere in the Pacific Ocean. The California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) estimates that the Huntington Harbour neighborhood, the area northeast of the Bo|oaChicaWetlands, and the southeast corner of Huntington Beach are at an elevated risk of a tsunami, as shown in FigmreHAZ-5' Coastal Hazards Now As a community with both bluffs and low-lying areas near the coast, Huntington Beach is at risk from two types of coastal hazards. High tides and high surf continually erode coastal bluffs located along the shoreline. This condition is often exacerbated by wind and inadequate drainage practices from development ontop of bluffs. Beaches underneathcon the coastal bluffs can act as a protective buffer; hmwever, these protective beaches themselves can be eroded avvay, particularly when structures such as seawalls, 'etUeo, and breakwaters interrupt the natural processes that maintain the beaches. The Huntington Beach coastline totals 9.5 noUeo of shoreline, including both state and City beach areas. Beaches and other low-lying portions of the planning area are threatened by sea level rise, a slow but gradual process that may cause average sea levels toincrease by as much as 5.5feet or more by the year 2100. Current science indicates that Ssea level rise is directly linked to climate change, and sea le is expected to increase over | time. An increase )n the frequency of intense storms that affect California is one possible effect of climate change, and any such increase would also likely increase erosion through high surf and storm surges. Higher sea levels may increase cononounKv vulnerability to hazards such as storm surges and tidal flooding, and may also exacerbate coastal erosion bv decreasing the size nf protective beaches. To support the General Plan, and in accordance with adopted guidelines of the California Coastal Commission, the City prepared o vulnerability assessment estimating the conmequenoeo, prubabUdv, and resulting risk from various sea level rise scenarios. Depending on the scenario, additional land located near the coast could be subject to varying degrees of shoreline erosion and more extreme storm-related flooding. These hazards could threaten private buildings, public facilities, roads, and beaches. ri*of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, Sep1ember2U17) \ / 5'9 7feD2 10, - 70 H8 392 This assessment looks forward to2100 to determine the specific extent of the city'm vulnerability to sea level rise, including an inventory of potentially affected assets and their estimated replacement value. Although most of this General Plan looks to the year 2040, the sea level rise assessment identifies vulnerabilities on o much longer horizon for multiple reasons. First, while the sea level rise assessment relies on the best available science and nnethoda, there is on inherent degree ofuncertainty in these projections, meaning sea levels could rise faster or slower than the estimated projections. Seoond. oa ~~~ |seacurrent science indicates that level|ewe| rise is af6rect consequence of ciinnoha change, | the amount of sea level rise could exceed estimates if the activities that cause climate change end up being greater than expected.Additionally, a building constructed within the horizon of this General Plan may atU| be used toward the end of the century; thua, it is important to understand potentially hazardous conditions within the planning area in 2100 to cover the |iMa span of building. Both coastal and inland areas face threats from sea level r)aeTh��hr�otboc�oato| onaom ~�= � is the naauit of erosion and flooding from wave run-up (particularly from large waves associated with coastal storms). Sea level rise threatens the inland areas by exacerbating flooding from very high tides, and by contributing to flooding from extreme rainfall events. Areas aubi�ct �o potential 000a�o| �r inland sea |�v�| rise by 20�O are identified aao ^ ' Potential Sea Level Rise Hazard Area in Figure HAZ-G. The Sunset Beach and COD Huntington Harbour neighborhoods and areas located south of the Huntington Beach Pier face the highest risks. The planning horizon of this General Pion is 2040, although the hazard area reflects onaoa of potential impact by 2050. This extra time helps ensure that projects proposed near the end of the General Plan horizon will still benefit from increased resiliency to sea level rise for several more years. It also provides safety margin in the event that future sea level rise is more severe or occurs more rapidly than anticipated in current modeling, oa previously discussed. Sea level rise risks within the hazard area are addressed by the Huntington Beach Coastal Resiliency Program (CRP), Strategies outlined in the CRP include monitoring and implementation of regulations to minimize impacts in low-lying coastal onaoa of the city` constructing new infrastructure in less vulnerable areas orusing methods more resilient than current mtandonda, considering sea level rise when planning shoreline protection structures, and encouraging new development in less vulnerable areas. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Oroft. September 2O17) \ / 5'11 llB -3P3- lfeD] 10^ - 71 a� Remediating Brownfield Sites �+ Due to historical aerospace, oil, and energy production uses and related contamination, several opportunity sites for future cleanup and remediation are located within the cc cc community. These sites offer new opportunities for brownfield development and reduce Pon" the potential for exposure to contaminants for future generations. For the purposes of this cc General Plan, brownfield sites are defined as properties that are contaminated and underutilized due to perceived remediation costs and liability concerns. The goals and policies provided below are intended to assist the City in the future development of sites that meet this criteria rather than regulate sites with current hazardous waste activities. Goal HAZ-5. Environmental cleanup and management of Brownfield sites improves 6• environmental qualityof life, desirability of surrounding neighborhoods, economic development and housing options in the community. CCU Policies A. Continue to identify, map, and remediate existing hazardous waste sites and require remediation when a property is redeveloped. Dow B. Encourage use of remediated brownfields for housing commercial industrial public and recreational uses and for open space opportunities while Pprioritizeint open space uses, renewable energy facilities, and other community-supporting facilities as preferred options for future use of remediated brownfield sites. C. Prohibit the future placement of sensitive land uses inclose proximity to hazardous material and waste sites. Managing Hazardous Materials and Wastes While brownfield sites pose a risk from hazardous materials that may have leaked into the environment in previous years, Huntington Beach community members and visitors also face risks from hazardous materials that are transported through the community or used as part of current activities, including vehicle and pipeline transport. The City can reduce risks from these materials by ensuring that proper safety practices are in place, and that emergency responders and community members have information necessary to protect themselves. Goal HAZ-6: The risk of exposure to hazardous materials in Huntington Beach is substantially decreased. Policies ( A. Avoid locating facilities that use, store, transport, process, or dispose of hazardous materials near residential areas or other sensitive uses. B. Promote the use of roadways with minimal exposure to residential areas or other sensitive uses as routes suitable for transporting hazardous materials. 5-22 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 72 HB -394- } B_Ensure that all emergency plans are fully inclusive of the community members of PC Huntington Beach. ;=a cc B_.0 Support the Community Emergency Response and Training(CERT) program as feasible depending on the availability of funding and volunteers. Reducing Potential Threats to Homeland Security low Y Huntington Beach is a desirable location to live and work as well as a destination C= for over 11 million visitors annually. Large-scale events such as the US W Open of Surfing attract large crowds a every year. In addition, the beach and Downtown area attract a wide variety of CC visitors on a regular basis. These CC conditions have increased the need for 01M enhanced emergency response and preparedness activities throughout the community. As a result, a portion of the City's emergency response resources are used to address planning and policy issues associated with homeland security, as well as to regularly monitor activities within these areas. In recent years, some events have escalated, causing minor property damage and injuries and resulting in additional police response. Goal HAZ-9 Residents and businesses are protected from human-caused and terrorism-related hazards. Policies A. Recommend emergency personnel become engaged in proactive community policing activities during special events. B, Ensure City procedures and protocols are updated to reference departmental roles in the Emergency Operations Plan, which outlines response and recovery activities for terrorism and civil unrest in the city. C. If deemed necessary during a large community event, activate the Emergency Operations Center to ensure effective coordination of emergency response activities. D, Expand emergency management planning and preparedness activities to include anti- terrorism components. 5 24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft September 2017 ) HB -395- Item 1.0. - 73 - �a�QW�� u�G� ��|m� ��u0-�N�� Issues, Goals, Coe The noise issues addressed inthis element include: ° Protecting noise-sensitive land uses ° Ensuring land use/noise compatibility ° Reducing noise from mobile sources ° Mitigating noise from oonptruotion, moainhananoa, and other sources Protecting Noise-Sensitive 8 and Uses Sensitive land uses have associated human activities that may be subject to stress or significant interference from noise. Noise-sensitive land uses are located in portions of the planning area that vary from moderately quiet residential areas to noisy major transportation corridors. Goal N-1. Noise-sensitive land.uses are protected in areas with acceptable noise levels. Policies A. Maintain acceptable stationary noise levels at existing noise-sensitive land uses such as aohoo|a. residential areas, and open spaces. B. Incorporate design and construction features into residential,efrd-mixed-use, and industrial-projects that shield noise-sensitive land uses from excessive noise. Ensuring Land Use/Noise Compatibility Some residential, cODlnlGrci8|. and 21 institutional land UG9S` particularly those located along arterial roadvvaya, axpahanoa excessive vehicular noise. Commercial and industrial land uses also have the potential to generate noise that can be considered intrusive to noise- sensitive land uses. Mixed-use development projects oftanino|uda both residential uses located above or in close proximity to oornrneroia| uses and stand-alone multi-family residential uses. A unique challenge presented by mixed-use development is that on one hand, such uses desire locations along busy street 8'18 \ � / City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Oraft. September 2017) L� lfe[D 10. - 7z1 88 -3V0- corridors, and on the other hand, state-mandated interior noise requirements for residential uses must be met within the residential portions of such uses. Goal N-2 Land use patterns are compatible with current and future noise levels. t'D Policies A. Require an acoustical study for proposed projects in areas where the existing or projected noise level exceeds or would exceed the maximum allowable levels identified in Table N-2. The acoustical study shall be performed in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Noise Element. B. Allow a higher exterior noise level standard for infill projects in existing residential areas adjacent to major arterials if no feasible mechanisms exist to meet exterior noise standards. C. Minimize excessive noise from industrial land uses through incorporation of site and building design features that are intended to reduce noise impacts to sensitive land uses. D. Encourage new mixed-use development projects to site loading areas, parking lots, driveways, trash enclosures, mechanical equipment, and other noise sources away from residential portions of the development, to the extent feasible. Reducing Noise from Mobile Sources Roadway noise from vehicle traffic is the most common source of noise in Huntington Beach. New development supporting anticipated population growth will increase traffic levels on arterials, resulting in increased noise levels. Future development of several vacant parcels and parcels that may support infill development or reuse will also have the potential to increase roadway noise levels in surrounding neighborhoods. In addition to roadways, rail and aircraft operations create noise in certain portions of the planning area. The general noise environment also includes occasional noise from private, police, emergency medical, and news/traffic monitoring helicopters. Goal N-3 The community is not disturbed by excessive noise from mobile sources such as vehicles, rail traffic, and aircraft. Policies A. Mitigate noise created by any new transportation noise source so that it does not exceed the exterior or interior sound levels specified in Table N-2. B. Prioritize use of site planning and project design techniques to mitigate excessive noise. The use of noise barriers shall be considered a means of achieving the noise standards only after all other practical design-related noise mitigation measures have been integrated into the project. ' C. Employ noise-reducing technologies such as rubberized asphalt, fronting homes to the roadway, or sound walls to reduce the effects of roadway noise on noise-sensitive land �f uses. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 6-19 HB -397- Item 10. - 75 0 ® o Dry Utilities Dry utilities provided in Huntington _ Beach include electricity, natural gas, internet and cable communications, } and both wired and wireless telephone service. Electricity is provided to residents and businesses in Huntington Beach through Southern ` . California Edison, and natural gas is provided by Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas). Southern California Edison provides renewable energy as part of its energy portfolio, with wind and geothermal providing the most energy of the renewable sources. The City has also installed 2.13 megawatts of solar panels at City Hall and the Central Library, helping to reduce City costs and providing the City more control over its energy supplies. Internet, cable, and/or communications services are 1 provided by third party purveyors. Cellular service is available from all major cellular networks. The City is committed to working with utility providers so that the most advanced and effective services are available to all residents and businesses. Infrastructure Finance Major infrastructure projects, including construction, expansion, renovation, or replacement of infrastructure, facilities, or equipment, are known as"capital projects."The City funds capital projects using a variety of sources_ The largest sources are special revenue funds and enterprise funds. Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are derived from entitlement funds, such as the gas tax, or developer funds, such as development impact fees. Entitlement funds are distributed based on population, whereas developer funds are used to minimize the impacts a development project will have on infrastructure. Special revenue funds include the Air Quality Fund, Traffic Impact Fund, Gas Tax Fund, Park Acquisition Fund, Measure M Fund, and Traffic Congestion Relief(Proposition 42) Fund. Enterprise Funds Enterprise funds are acquired from users paying for the use of a service, such as water and sewer. These funds support the cost of operations, maintenance, and upgrades to the system and service. Enterprise funds include the Water Fund, the Sewer Service Fund, and the General Fund Capital Improvement Reserve. 7_8 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 76 HB -398- n c► Goal PSI-2. Huntington Beach residents and property owners are protected from fire hazards and beach hazards, and adequate marine safety and emergency medical services are provided by modern facilities and advanced technology. Policies A. Consider the relationship between the location and rate of planned growth, the placement of critical facilities,and the resulting demands on fire, marine safety, and EMS facilities and personnel. B. Adopt locally defined performance objectives for emergency response to fire and EMS calls, and periodically evaluate fire service and EMS facilities and personnel relative to community needs. C. Consider fire-related emergency response needs when improving streets and critical intersections. D. Research, procure, and use modern equipment, advanced technology, and other innovative techniques to optimize fire, marine safety, and EMS services. E. Ensure that new development and reuse projects and existing land uses promote fire safety. F. Continue to provide adequate marine safety services, and consider additional safety measures to address increases in visitors to the city's beach areas and protect citizens from ocean surf line hazards. FG. Ensure development provides adequate access for public safety responders in the event of an emergency. Transforming Libraries into CommunityRural Centers Public libraries are valuable cultural centers that are well used by a variety of community members. Increases in library patronage generated by development may overload the library system's capacity to provide adequate services without appropriate funding increases. The City has an opportunity to transform libraries to offer expanded cultural, artistic, and educational activities. Goal PSI-3. Libraries are central community facilities and library services respond to changing community needs. Policies A. Adapt libraries to become expanded cultural centers providing public space to meet community needs for after-school programs,job training programs, workshops, and other activities while ensuring they maintain the basic service of providing public access to information, reading, and education resources. B. Consider constructing new libraries and rehabilitating and expanding existing libraries and programs to meet changing community needs. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 7-11 HB -399- Item 10. - 77 n v 0 0 Goal PSI-5. A range of educational programs and facilities meets the needs of all ages of the community. Policies A. Continue to consult with school districts to maximize existing use of school spaees--sites while aeeemmedatirgaddressinca future community and school district needs. B. Continue to support and expand continuing education, after-school programs, and educational programs for all ages including educational opportunities offered in neighboring universities and colleges. C. Continue to work with school districts for shared use of school district park spacesE-ftstwe for public recreational activities and the use of City parks to support school educational purposes. G:D. Ensure that developers consult with the appropriate school district with the intent to mitigate a potential impact on school facilities prior to project approval by the City. Maintaining Optimal Physical Condition of Water and Sewer Infrastructure Water and sewer infrastructure is managed through the use of separate enterprise funds. As the water and sewer systems continue to age, deterioration will occur. Water system infrastructure is much more costly to construct and maintain than the sewer system.Water Master Plan (WMP) updates are performed typically every five years, with the last update adopted in 2016. The Sewer Master Plan study was last performed in 2003 and will be updated as needed to identify new major improvements to maintain and replace aging sewer infrastructure. Goal PSI-S. The costs of water and sewer infrastructure improvements are addressed by benefifting development projects. Policies A. Provide and maintain wastewater collection facilities which adequately convey wastewater generated by existing land uses and future projects while maximizing cost efficiency. B. Ensure that the costs of water and wastewater infrastructure improvements are borne by those who benefit, through adequate fees and charges or the construction of improvements. C. Explore additional funding sources to support necessary maintenance, expansion, and upgrades to the water and sewer systems. i } City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 7-13 Item 10. - 78 HB -400- n cr D. Improve solid waste collection and recycling services associated with special events and the availability of trash and recycling receptacles in public areas, including but not limited to Downtown, Beach Boulevard, City parks, and along the beach. E. Continue to expand household recycling services and provide public information regarding how community members can dispose of or recycle materials correctly. F. Reduce the amount of waste disposed per employee in the business community by improving commercial recycling services and providing information to support waste reduction. G. Expand the types of waste that can be recycled or otherwise diverted from the community waste stream, including organic materials in compliance with state law. H. Continue to provide public information regarding residential collection of household hazardous wastes including paint containers, electronics, household chemicals,motor oils, and pesticides, and promote development of facilities that collect these materials. Meeting Cary Utility Needs Dry utility services, such as electricity, natural gas, telephone, and data services, both meet basic needs and enhance quality of life for Huntington Beach residents. Supporting or providing enhanced data services in industrial and employment/technology areas is also an important economic development strategy. These services are provided by independent entities that set their own service standards and facility improvement strategies. The City works with service providers to ensure that goals and service expectations are met for both current and future development. Goal PSI-10 Superior electricity, natural gas telephone and data services improve guality of life and sport economic development. Policies A. Continue to consult with dry utility service providers to ensure that the community's current and future needs are met. B. Continue to require utilities to be placed underground as part of new development projects. C. Support the use of new and emerging communication technologies. D. Promote provision of high-capacity data systems to support new development and reuse projects, particularly within the Research and Technology land use designation. E_Encourage integrated and cost-effective design and technology features within new /'� development and reuse projects to minimize demands on dry utility networks. E-F Create and maintain a"dig once" policy. '7-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -40 i- Item 10. - 79 Land use sement City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs LU P 1 Related Prcirams and Governmental Agencies Continue to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local programs and regulations, including but not limited to the following: • California Coastal Act and Local Coastal Program • Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy • Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission ��d� N;I • Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance ' • Huntington Beach Municipal Code Departments: Community Development, Public Works, Police, Fire Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing h LU-P 2 Surf City Culture and Identity Continue to ensure that all new development and reuse projects in the city are designed in a manner that preserves the Surf City culture and identity. Encourage project applicants to emphasize the Surf City culture and identity through building orientation and design, landscaping, and other visual features. Provide specific guidelines and resources for how to incorporate the Surf City culture and identity into proposed developments. The Surf City theme should be emphasized in development projects throughout the city, not only in visitor-serving areas. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.3. Downtown Preservation Continue to maintain the character, function, and visual feel of Downtown as the central commercial, entertainment, and recreational district in Huntington Beach. Allow for new i development in Downtown that supports the area's characteristics and purpose.All design standards applied in Downtown, including building and architectural design guidelines, City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-3 Item 10. - 80 HB -402- street furniture standards, landscaping requirements, and sign standards, shall emphasize the character of Downtown and reinforce Downtown as distinct from the rest of the city. The Downtown area shall continue to emphasize pedestrian and bicycle-oriented transportation. Ensure that Downtown continues to meet the needs and expectations of residents, local businesses, and visitors. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development, Public Works, Police, Fire Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.4. Residential Compatibility Protect existing residential neighborhoods from increased development or redevelopment P� on surrounding parcels that may prove incompatible with residential uses, including 3c development or redevelopment that generates substantial traffic volumes, produces noise or unpleasant odors, or involves the use of hazardous materials. Identify opportunities to convert existing land uses near residential neighborhoods that are incompatible with the neighborhood to more suitable uses. Ensure that all new homes in existing residential s neighborhoods are compatible with surrounding structures, while still allowing for variations in appearance to maintain an interesting visual character. Departments: Community Development, Police Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.S. Protection for Unique Areas � Ensure that the unique neighborhoods, corridors, and land use subareas within the planning area maintain their distinct character and visual appearance. All standards for building design, streetscape design, and landscaping in these areas should be consistent with the area's look and feel. Work closely with residents and business owners in these areas to ensure that new development proposals are consistent with the character and visual appearance of the neighborhood, corridor, or subarea. Departments: Community Development, Public Works i Related Policies: To be provided following adoption = j Funding Source: General Fund, development fees, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing 8-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -403- Item 10. - 81 L -P.9. Accessibility of New Development Focus new development, particularly larger developments with a high number of residents, anop|oya8s. Custornars, and/or visitors, in areas that are easily accessible by alternative modes of transportation, including walking, bicycling, and transit use.Work with applicants to include project innp[oxannentsthat support alternative transportation. Consider the ease of reaching other destinations from the proposed dexa|oprnan1 using alternative transportation, and identify opportunities to improve local and regional transportation networks. Coordinate with the {}ngnga County Transportation Authority to ensure consistency between proposed land uses and changes to transit operations. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works Related Policies: Tobe provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing Ensure that Huntington Beach has a sufficient supply of housing for individuals and f8nliUas of all inoornao, including axtnarna|y |om+ and vary low-income residents. Meet or exceed the target number of affordable units specified in the oitv's Regional Housing Needs Allocation. Integrate affordable housing into mixed-use projects and market-rate residential developments. Locate affordable housing near high-quality jobs, and ensure that affordable housing sites have sufficient access to alternative modes of transportation, Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: Tbb9 provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.11. Industrial Expansion and Redevelopment Attract new businesses to the oity's industrial araas, and encourage existing businesses to expand. Work with property owners in industrial areas to ensure that buildings provide the amenities necessary to attract and retain high-value tenants. Amend zoning and development codes to remove regulatory barriers that may prevent businesses in new and emerging fields from locating in Huntington Beach. Identify opportunities to allow businesses that support industrial uses and provide services to employees to locate inor near industrial areas. Ensure that new and expanded businesses do not create conflicts with surrounding land uses and community character, and work with businesses t0reduce existing conflicts. Require preparation of a health risk assessment for new uses located in the Industrial and Research and Technolog nations that potentially generate diesel particulate matter emisr2ions and potential toxic.air contaminant (TAC) emitters located 8-8 \ ` / City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Dnsft. September 2017) T 1A @7 ^i�D] ^"' - "�. 8B -4U4- within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive uses and use recommendations outlined in the health risk assessment to determine siting limitations and mitigation approaches. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.12. Technology and Innovation Subareas Recruit and incentivize new business uses in the Northwest Industrial and Gothard Street Subareas suitable for light industrial and manufacturing activities, with an emphasis on high-tech businesses, research and development, small-scale advanced manufacturing, . and similar land uses, as well as supportive uses that provide basic services to employees. Buildings in these subareas should be flexible enough to support a variety of potential tenants and provide the amenities sufficient to attract and retain desired types of a �s businesses, including necessary energy and communication infrastructure. Ensure that Technology and Innovation Subareas are easily accessible by multiple modes of transportation, including walking and biking. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement District funding '' Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.13. Intersection Enhancement Subareas Develop a City-defined landscape program for major intersections in the Intersection Enhancement Subareas to unify the landscaping between individual developments and further enhance the aesthetic appeal of the areas. Develop design guidelines that define appropriate colors, materials, signage, and architectural treatments for commercial developments located at major intersections to enable developments to become more unified as new uses are established and properties are updated over time. Work with individual property owners to create additional pedestrian connections and modify the circulation patterns in parking areas to create pathways for pedestrians to access the site and internal uses. Identify and remove existing curb cuts that no longer meet current safety requirements, and work with property owners to develop new circulation patterns within sites affected by this activity. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoptions ; Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017). &7 HB -405- Item 1.0. - 83 LU P 14 Housing for Industrial and Research/Technology Employees Consider allowing housing near Industrial and Research/Technology areas to create convenient residences for employees in these land uses. Ensure that any housing in or near these areas does not conflict with Industrial or Research/Technology activities, and is not exposed to any potential undesirable impacts that may be generated by these land uses. Avoid building housing on land that is more suitable for nonresidential land uses within the Industrial or Research/Technology zones. Consider opportunities to locate ^� housing above nonresidential buildings. Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.15. Commercial Revitalization Identify and improve struggling commercial areas within the planning area. Work with property owners and local business groups to select and implement revitalization strategies, including renovations to the building stock, changes to the streetscape and landscaping, and improved access for multiple modes of transportation. Determine which types of land uses are most suitable for the area, including the potential to build residential units above commercial properties. Use existing assets such as historic buildings, and consider how older buildings may be renovated to support new land uses. Pursue all available sources of funding to provide economic assistance to businesses in revitalized areas. Departments: Planning Division, Office of Business Development, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding $ Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P 16 Business Improvement Districts In coordination with business groups, establish Business Improvement Districts or other economic development strategies to generate funding for area improvements that will result in increased customers and economic activity. Coordinate improvements funded through Business Improvement Districts to ensure that all businesses are benefiting. Identify opportunities to use Business Improvement Districts for improvements that result in long-term improved economic sustainability, including resource conservation programs and hazard resiliency. Departments: City Manager's Office, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Q_R City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 84 HB -406- Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.17. Residential Property Maintenance Provide residential property owners with resources to support preserving a high quality of housing, including available economic incentives, financing programs, and assistance in obtaining the necessary City permits. These items should allow residential property owners to maintain safe, healthy, and comfortable living environments, as well as provide opportunities for improvements such as energy efficiency retrofits. Ensure that support and incentives are also made available to residential landlords to maintain and improve the quality of rental stock, while maintaining affordability. Department: Building Division, Code Enforcement Division, Office of Business " Development Police,ce, Fire Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.18. Economic Development Assistance ` Maintain existing economic development programs, and identify and implement opportunities to expand and improve these programs. Through economic development assistance, emphasize businesses that provide for unmet or undermet needs in Huntington Beach, provide high-quality jobs, support new and emerging industries, or provide economic opportunities to historically underrepresented persons such as ethnic minorities, women, or disabled individuals. Coordinate with local business groups and - a academic institutions to improve these programs and expand their reach. Monitor and report on the effectiveness of economic development assistance programs, and revise F programs as needed to improve success. Department: Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.19. Local and Diverse Economy E Encourage the establishment and expansion of businesses which provide an increase in job type diversity and support a healthy jobs-housing balance in the planning area. Emphasize jobs for people with a wide variety of education backgrounds, skills, and gip, passions. Work to ensure that jobs provide a sufficient wage, allowing employees to live a near their workplace, and that such jobs include opportunities for advancement. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-9 HB -407- Item 10. - 85 21 Departments: Planning Division, Office of Business Development N Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding, Business Improvement District funding a Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.20. Commercial Diversity Work with the local business community to ensure that retail and other commercial facilities in Huntington Beach meet resident needs by providing desired types of goods and services at reasonable prices. Consider the varying commercial needs of residents, including lower-income individuals, minority groups, Identify minari rou s, and non-traditional families. � v opportunities to meet commercial demand from surrounding communities and to attract Vg customers from a wider region. Encourage businesses to fill unmet commercial demand through economic incentives and favorable development policies. Departments: Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing �r. LU-P.21. Retail Sales Monitoring Track all taxable retail sales in Huntington Beach, and publicize this information regularly to City officials, members of the public, and the local business community. Use this information to determine the amount of retail leakage (consumers purchasing items from retailers outside of the city) for key categories. Work with business groups to determine the causes of retail leakage, including why consumers may favor a store in another community, and if there is residual demand for retail goods that are not met within Huntington Beach. Identify strategies to address the causes of retail leakage. Departments: City Treasury, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.22. Closure of Surplus School Sites Building Reuse In the event of the closure of a surplus school site, work with school districts to develop and implement alternative uses for the property.. Consistent with state law, explore with the school districts Te the eAeflt pessible, eFnphasize alternative uses for the site seheel that serve a public benefit, including other education facilities, community centers, recreation facilities, and open space, although all uses should be considered. Work to fenavate and expand existing seheal buildings te seeemrnedste new pfoposed 8-10 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 86 HB -408- uses, Fethef than eenstiueting new buildings. Altefflative uses of seheel pfepefty should enable the building te be eenvefted baeTk te selheOl uses at a'k-ANIF-date if need Departments: Community Services, Planning Division, City Manager's Office, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P 23 Overnight Accommodations Encourage additional expansion of overnight accommodations in Huntington Beach, consisting of both new businesses and expansion and renovation of existing properties. Identify suitable locations for new and expanded accommodations, and work with property owners and business groups to consider whether lodging on these properties is feasible. ` Support the inclusion of smaller lodging uses as part of mixed-use developments. Ensure that the supply of lodging in Huntington Beach meets the needs of different types of Y visitors, including vacationing families, single adults and couples, and business travelers. Support a range of different lodging options at various rice points. Explore the feasibilit ' 11IR pp 9 g� 9 p p p Y of short-term vacation rentals. �� 34k_ Departments: Community Development, Office of Business Development , Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, Business Improvement District funding Time Frame: Ongoing LU-P.24. Shuttle Services Explore creating a free or low-cost shuttle service connecting the shore and Downtown to major shopping districts, hotels, and other visitor destinations. The shuttle should have sufficient hours of operation and arrive frequently enough to offer a viable alternative to car travel. As funding allows, adjust the operating schedule to support employee commutes to visitor destinations. The shuttle service and supportive infrastructure (such as stops) should be comfortable, safe, visually engaging, and marketed with unique � u? branding. Departments: Office of Business Development, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees, Business Improvement District ! funding Time Frame: Consider feasibility by 2020 ' City of Huntington Beach General Plan(Draft, September 2017) 8-11 HB -409- Item 10. - 87 CIRC-P.4. Emergency Access Provide approved means for emergency vehicles to access and turn around on all streets. Departments: Public Works, Planning Division, Fire, Police Related Policy: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P 5 Emergency Management and Homeland Security Program Implement the City's Emergency Management and Homeland Security (EMHS) Program according to requirements and provisions of the State Emergency Management System (SEMS). Ensure that the program establishes community evacuation routes and emergency shelter facilities, and is easily available to the public. Departments: Fire, Police, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P 6 Neighborhood Circulation Improvements Prepare and maintain a Neighborhood Traffic Management Technical Administrative Report(TAR)that identifies needed methods to address cut-through traffic volumes, high speeds, truck traffic intrusions, demonstrated accident history, parking shortages, or school-related traffic congestion in city neighborhoods such as: • Discouraging creation of new major roadway connections that would adversely impact the character of existing residential neighborhoods. • Continuing to develop and implement parking and traffic control plans for neighborhoods that are adversely impacted by spill-over parking and traffic, as feasible. • Implementing the Residential Parking Permit Program (Municipal Code Chapter 10.42) in residential areas as prescribed in the Municipal Code. • Considering appropriate traffic-calming measures such as raised medians and provision of bike or transit lanes to mitigate problems posed by schools and other land uses that generate high traffic volumes at specific times. Provide solutions to mitigate these problems as warranted by local studies. S Department: Public Works, Fire Related policies: To be provided following adoption 8-16 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 88 HB -41 o- CIRC-P 10 Waterborne Transportation Continue to support the maintenance of existing waterways and encourage private development of waterborne transportation for recreation or commuting. Departments: Planning Division, Community Services, Public Works Related Policy: To be provided following adoption r Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Capital Improvements CIRC-P 11 Capital Improvement Program Use the City's 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process to prioritize, fund, and build required roadway and bikeway improvements, and to address phasing and r construction of traffic infrastructure throughout the city. To prioritize these improvements, the City's TARS will be reviewed and updated regularly with current citywide traffic counts for roadway links and intersections. Roadways and intersections that are approaching the LOS standards stated in Policy CIRC-1.13 should be prioritized appropriately for improvements including road widening, paving, parking restrictions, or intersection improvements. iDepartments: Public Works, City Council Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P 12 Principal and Secondary Intersection Improvements Prepare and maintain a Principal and Secondary Intersections TAR that will include information such as roadway dimensions, a listing of intersections and roadway improvements required to transition from the current system of roadways to full implementation of the Arterial Highway Plan, current citywide traffic counts for roadway links and intersections, and other useful traffic-related information. Content included will be based on need, as determined by the Director of Public Works. Updates to the TAR will be coordinated annually in tandem with the Capital Improvement Program. The TAR will be available for use by City staff and decision-makers, and should be available for review by the public. Include TAR information in the City's GIS system as appropriate and feasible. V Departments: Public Works, City Council, Police, Fire Related Policies: To be provided following adoption 8_1 g City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -41 1- Item 10. - 89 CIRC-P.16. Pedestrian Facilities and Enhancement Zones Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide accessible pedestrian walkways between developments, schools, and public facilities. Review potential areas in or near Downtown, adjacent to the beach, and along portions of Beach Boulevard for designation as pedestrian enhancement zones. Prepare and maintain a Pedestrian Facilities TAR and other pedestrian facility related analyses describing the location and proposed improvements in enhancement zones. Such improvements may include wider sidewalks, enhanced or new crosswalks, trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, or traffic-calming measures.All improvements shall comply with ADA accessibility standards, Exact improvements will vary depending on location. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works w Working With: School districts 1 Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund r! rpN Time Frame: Prepare Pedestrian Facilities Technical Administrative Report by 2020, ongoing implementation CIRC-P.17. Equestrian Facilities Continue to ensure that trails and other equestrian facilities are maintained by the responsible party and expanded as opportunities arise. Departments: Community Services, Public Works Related Policy: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing Development Review Requirements CIRC-P.18. Site Development Permit Process and CEQA Utilize the site development permit process and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to: • Review potential impacts of proposed projects to the circulation system and require appropriate mitigation measures as required by CEQA. 0 Require preparation of traffic impact studies as described in the City traffic study guidelines. LIN� • Require new development proposals to consider and minimize vehicle miles traveled. 8-20 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 90 HB -412- Improvement of signal operations on state highways in the Gcity, including the development and implementation of effective signal synchronization programs and advanced signal communications infrastructure. �s Investigate the potential for Caltrans to deetass4y relinquish Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway as a state and tfansfeF the Fespens a ^e a-to the City Departments: Public Works, Planning Division, City Council Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.26. Southern California Association of Governments Participate with the Southern California Association of Governments and represent the City's interests in development of regional transportation initiatives such as the Regional Transportation Plan. Departments: Public Works, Planning Division, City Council Related Policies: To be provided following adoption s Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC P 27 South Coast Air Quality Management Distric# Work closely with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to improve air quality and incorporate the Air Quality Management Plan into the City's practices and programs. Department: Public Works, Planning Division, City Council Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC P 26 Orange County Transportation Authority Work with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to achieve the following: e Maintain consistency with the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH)within the city. fr ® Pursue amendment of the MPAH to reclassify or delete street segments as identified in Figure CIRC-3. Implement the Congestion Management Program (CMP) in the city. 8-24 City of Huntington Beach General Plan(Draft, September 2017) HB -413- Item 10. - 91 • Expand and improve bus service throughout the city, and between Huntington Beach and other communities. • Encourage provision of attractive and appropriate transit amenities, including shaded bus stops. • Provide special transit services (such as direct shuttle or dial-a-ride services). ® Support and implement the OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan, and participate in future updates and revisions to the plan. "' • Plan and implement an urban rail system that links the city to cents! Orange Countyhyr; and Los Angeles County. • invest in and Investigate the development of a transportation center in the _ coastal area. • Plan and implement Measure M and M2 projects. • Maintain consistency with OCTA's Long Range Transportation Plan. • Review, every five years, the Orange County Master Plan of Bikeways to ensure = consistency. Update Huntington Beach's Bike Plan, as appropriate. • Work with OCTA to study vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure technology. • Support the OC Loop project. • Pursue Measure M Proiect S funding to link the Goldenwest Transit Center to the ,y resort area of Anaheim as funds are available, Departments: Public Works, City Council ri Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund federal New Starts state proposition funding, Measure �f M2 Time Frame: Ongoing - CIRC P 29 Future Santa Ana River Bridge Crossings Participate in ongoing regional planning efforts regarding future Santa Ana River bridge crossings. �T r Departments: Public Works, City Council Related Policy: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund '' �a Time Frame: Ongoing r:ity of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-25 Item 10. - 92 HB -414- CIRC-P.30_ Single-Occupancy Vehicle Legislation Remain aware of national, state, and regional legislation directed at reducing use of single- occupancy vehicles, and do what is feasible to support it. a - Departments: Public Works, City Manager's Office =z Related Policy: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund g{3 z Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.31. Adjacent Jurisdictions and Transportation Agencies Work with adjacent jurisdictions, including the Cities of Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Newport Beach, Seal Beach, and Westminster and Orange County, to ensure that traffic impacts do not adversely impact Huntington Beach. Continue to work with other public agencies to ensure that the city's circulation and transportation system is efficient and meets applicable safety standards, -_ _ Engage in discussions with Caltrans, OCTA, and Orange County regarding the City assuming jurisdictional control of key areas, and being involved in the decision-making "£' processes of areas in the city which are to remain under Caltrans jurisdiction. Departments: Public Works, Planning Division, City Council _ Related Policy: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.32. Transit System Coordination Encourage the inclusion of facilities that transport bicycles surfboards and other beach - activity equipment on public transit vehicles (both fixed route and paratransit) wherever possible. Work to make routes and vehicles available and accessible to the disabled and y seniors. _ Departments: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing CIRC-P.33. Preserve Abandoned Rights-of-Way Continue to work with rail agencies to reserve existing and abandoned rights-of-way for future transportation uses, such as transit or bicycle facilities. 8-26 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -4 1 s- Item 10. - 93 _3xwcw%m, Conservation Environmentin Resources and City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs ERC-P 1 Related Programs and Governmental Agencies Continue to ensure compliance With federal, state, and local programs and regulations, including but not limited to the following: • California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and Scoping Plan (AS 2J • California Coastal Act and the California Coastal Commission • California Environmental Quality Act • California Endangered Species Act • California Fish and Game Code • Quimby Act r� • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit • Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) Departments: Planning Division, Public Works, Community Services Related Policies: To be provided following adoption �rr Funding Source: General Fund, development fees �ha�a Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Tracking . Monitor the status of greenhouse gas emissions in the city, as directed in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, and report the results to City officials and members of the public as part of an annual reporting effort, through the following actions: Estimate community greenhouse gas emissions to track progress toward adopted ' greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals of 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 53.33 percent below 2020 levels by 2040. ? Track implementation of all greenhouse gas emissions reduction measures and actions, including the status of each effort and progress toward the performance metrics in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program. Department: City Manager's Office Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund - Time Frame. Annually beginning in 2017 8_28 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 94 HB -416- 4 F ERC-P 6 Energy Efficiency Audits or no-cost energy audits to homes and businesses to Develop a program to provide low- help identify the most cost-effective ways to improve building energy efficiency. - = Recommendations should include low-cost actions which can be taken by renters. Publicize the availability of these energy audits, and strongly encourage all building owners interested in installing solar energy systems to conduct an energy efficiency audit prior to installation. Departments: City Manager's Office, Building Division - Related Policies: To be provided following adoption a #� Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding A,e l' �¢ Time Frame: By 2017 ERC-P 7 Energy Efficiency Retrofits � Explore strategies to encourage energy efficiency retrofits in existing buildings by making upgrades more economically feasible, including offering incentives or financing mechanisms, and implement cost-effective strategies as feasible. Work to increase participation in property assessed clean energy (PACE) programs. Investigate the feasibility of a revolving loan program to support energy efficiency retrofits. Collaborate with residential and commercial landlords to support energy efficiency upgrades in rental units and leased commercial space. Department: City Manager's Office Community Development f Related Policies: To be provided following adoption E Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding r Time Frame: Ongoing HE Ga R, ERG-P 8 Energy Efficiency in Large Facilities h 11,111, INS In partnership with business groups, utility companies, and other involved stakeholders, work with large nonresidential properties to support energy efficiency retrofits in major facilities. Provide recommendations about available rebates and financing mechanisms, encourage highly effective lower-cost actions such as lighting upgrades and retrocommissioning, and work toward providing customized specific solutions for ON individual facilities based on energy audits or other assessments. Publicize participating a facilities in events and in local media. G N W I�IpI�,Pt,.F".w Departments: City Manager's Office, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption a Z" Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing 8_30 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -417- Item 10. - 95 Capital Improvements ERC-P.17. Alternative Vehicles for City Fleet Transition the City vehicle fleet to alternative fuels such as electricity, biofuel, or hydrogen. Replace conventional vehicles at the end of their operational lives with alternative fuel vehicles as feasible. Consider the cost of alternative fuel vehicles relative to conventional vehicles over the entire lifetime of the vehicles. Department: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption a Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.18. Renewable Fuel Stations Install renewable fuel stations, including DC Fast Chargers and biofuel pumps, at City- owned facilities to support alternative fuel fleet vehicles. Open renewable fuel stations to members of the public to the extent feasible. Integrate solar photovoltaic systems into public electric vehicle charging facilities as possible. Encourage installation of renewable fuel stations as part of existing and new development projects. Department: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.19. Municipal Microgrid Study opportunities to develop a microgrid for critical municipal facilities, allowing them to continue to operate during a power interruption with greater flexibility and in a more environmentally responsible way than currently allowed by diesel backup generators. Proposed microgrids should link key City administration and public safety buildings, as *aYI well as other critical facilities such as water pumping stations as feasible, -rely on energy storage and renewable energy systems as much as possible, and be consistent with broadband and wireless master plans. Departments: City Manager, Fire, Police, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: Study completed by 2020 8-34 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 96 H13 -41 s- ERC-P 20 Municipal Green Buildings Establish Explore minimum standards for new municipal facilities that require green building and energy efficiency features that exceed state requirements, and explore opportunities to retrofit existing municipal facilities. Study the feasibility of installing renewable energy systems on new and retrofitted municipal facilities, in support of state zero net energy goals. Pursue green building certification for new and retrofitted municipal facilities, and publicize successes in local and regional media. Departments: City Manager, Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption I Funding Source: Capital Improvement Funds, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P 21. New Parks and Open Space Explore opportunities to acquire and develop new parkland and open space, including mini parks, dog parks, athletic fields, amphitheaters, gardens, and shared facilities. Emphasize creating new parkland and open space in currently underserved areas, and in areas expected to see significant new development. Ensure that community members are - served equitably by new parkland and open space, and that future parks and open space meet community needs and values. All new parkland and open space should be easily accessible by foot and by bicycle, as well as via public transit to the extent feasible. When possible, locate new parks near elementary schools with independent street frontage. Departments: Community Services, Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: Capital Improvement Funds Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P 22 Open Space Preservation Continue to preserve open space in Huntington Beach, including by setting aside areas within parkland for natural areas. Structures or other development in open space should encourage low-intensity and passive activities such as nature trails, picnic and observational areas, informational signs and displays, and peripheral bike paths. Avoid development or recreational activities that may damage open space areas or be otherwise incompatible with existing habitat and native species. Department: Community Services Related Policies: To be provided following adoption I Funding Source: General Fund, Capital Improvement Funds Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-35 HB -4 t 9- Item 10. - 97 Departments: Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Standards established by 2020 ERC-P.31. Construction Activity Emissions - ` In partnership with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, continue to enforce standards to reduce air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from construction activities, and impose these standards on new projects as a condition of development. Continue to require the use of best management practices to reduce dust and other airborne debris, reduce idling time for construction equipment, and explore the feasibility of requiring construction projects to use alternative fuel construction equipment. Require monitoring and reporting throughout construction activities to ensure the standards are being properly applied, and promptly remedy any violations. Update standards as needed to support new technologies and practices. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption �z Funding Source: General Fund, development fees � Y Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.32. Coastal Access and Recreation Continue to provide a high degree of access to the coast, and identify opportunities to equitably improve coastal access for all community members that all Huntington Beach community members and visitors have reasonable access to an array of active and passive coastal recreational uses, and consider providing additional recreational uses in other locations to improve access without diminishing existing uses or coastal biological integrity. - - Departments: Planning Division, Community Services, Public Works a Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.33. Water Conservation for New Development Continue to require new development projects to include feasible and innovative water 44 conservation features as appropriate. Require the use of recycled water for landscaping irrigation, grading, and other non-contact uses where recycled water is available or expected to be available. Require new projects to include low-impact development strategies as feasible, which may include green stormwater infrastructure and graywater City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-30 Item 10. - 98 HB -420- Departments: Public Works, Community Services Related Policies: To be provided following adoption - Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P.37. Tidal Circulation Coordination Work with surrounding jurisdictions to improve the tidal circulation in the Bolsa Chica Channel, Huntington Harbour, the Huntington Beach Wetlands, and Anaheim Bay. - Coordinate to minimize construction of features that impact natural sand migration and littoral drift within the local environment. Develop ways to improve tidal circulation while also supporting increased biological integrity of coastal habitats, and improving the aesthetics and recreational viability of coastal areas. Work with the State Lands Commission and the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways to ensure they secure funding to maintain the Bolsa Chica tidal inlet. Departments: Public Works, Community Services Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P 38 Air Pollutants and GHG Emissions from Stationary Sources Work with the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the California Air Resources Board, in coordination with local business groups, to decrease air pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from large industrial facilities and other stationary sources. Pursue funding to reduce emissions from major sources, and prioritize emissions reduction activities near sensitive land uses and in disproportionally affected neighborhoods. Continue to coordinate with federal, state, and regional agencies to enforce air quality standards and improve air quality. As future land use plans are proposed and/or amended undertake heightened consideration of policies and strategies �9 to minimize exposure of sensitive land uses and disproportionally affected neighborhoods to health risks related to air pollution. Departments: City Manager's Office, Community Development �F Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ERC-P 39 Regional Recreation Coordination Partner with surrounding communities and Orange County to increase access to a wide range of recreational services and programs for Huntington Beach community members. Explore opportunities to work with private recreational businesses to provide facilities and City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-41 HB -42 i- Item 10. - 99 Public Information and Outreach ERC-P.42. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Education Widely distribute information about energy efficiency and n0oeemat0n strategies, including information about rebates, financing opportunities, and |OvY-c0et and free strategies, Provide information about energy efficiency and conservation strategies for both residential and nonresidential facilities. Distribute inf0[nn8t|0n in multiple languages through in-person events and workshops, print media, television, radio, and online/social media. Identify members 0f the Huntington Beach community that are not easily reached by conventional outreach cannp8l0DS, and develop o0nnnnunhx engagement strategies to involve these community members. Department: C)h/Manager's Office Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General FUnd, grant funding l[inne Frame: Ongoing ERG P.Q. EntEgy&�a"etffiejis Time Frame- engeing ERG P.44. Green Ba"dinei Demonstration City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Dxeft. September 2U17) \ / 8-43 lfeD] l O_ - 100 BB -422- Tinie Frame, By 2922 E � ERC-P.435.Water Efficiency and Conservation Education l =r Expand existing water efficiency and conservation education campaigns to provide information about reducing water use to Huntington Beach residents and businesses. Include information about available rebates, financing opportunities for retrofits, and low- cost and free water efficiency and conservation options. Information should be distributed in multiple languages through in-person events and workshops, print media, television, radio, and online/social media. Identify members of the Huntington Beach community that are not easily reached by conventional outreach campaigns, and develop community engagement strategies to involve these community members. Continue water efficiency and conservation efforts during normal or wet water years, and work to ensure that water efficiency and conservation accomplishments continue outside of drought conditions. - Departments: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund, grant funding Time Frame: By 2020 v 3 g-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -423- Item 10. - 101 iG� et to support resiliency efforts. Funding should emphasize the use of soft shore t stabilization and avoid shore armoring structures. Departments: Community Development � Related Policies: To be provided fallowing adoption Funding Sources: General Fund, grant funds Time Frame: Local Coastal Program amendment by 2020, ongoing implementation HAZ-P 4 Runoff and Ponding Standards Amend the Municipal Code to establish standards for new development and significant retrofit projects to reduce the risk of increased runoff and ponding, and to support 5 increased groundwater recharge. These standards shall emphasize the use of permeable paving, bioswales, and other law-impact development strategies. Departments: Community Development, Public Works ' Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund I �= Time Frame: Standards established by 2020, ongoing implementation � is � HAZ-P.5. Fire Inspections Continue to conduct regular inspections of nonresidential buildings to ensure that fire safety standards are met. Residential occupancies;, based on type, retkf shill be inspected at a minimum frequency s required by state law. r, Department: Fire Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing -= HAZ-P.6. Abandoned Oil Wells Reevaluate the safety and status of abandoned oil wells on brownfield properties where i new development or reuse projects are proposed. Identify whether the well was properly T decommissioned or whether mitigation activities may be necessary. - - Department: Fire u Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing .711 — .. Tas g-46 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 102 HB -424- HAZ-P.7.Alternative Brownfield Uses Identify and maintain a database of brownfield sites that may not be suitable for residential or nonresidential development. Work with property owners to encourage alternative use of such sites, including but not limited to renewable energy facilities, open spaces, or other community-supporting uses. Seek federal, state, and private funds for the assessment and remediation of brownfield sites in the Ocity that have redevelopment potential. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Database completed by 2020, ongoing implementation HAZ-P.8. Hazardous Materials Inspections and Database 4k: Continue to conduct inspections of facilities that manufacture, transport, store, process, or dispose of hazardous material and waste. Ensure that all information in City databases is up to date and that facilities are complying with all applicable requirements. Identify opportunities for facilities to improve their hazardous materials and waste methods to ' r comply with best management practices. The Citly's participating agency will coordinate with other certified unified program agencies (CUPAs) in Orange County and with the 9 California Environmental Protection Agency CUPA office to ensure the program is funded and equipped and that the employees receive proper training. Department: Fire Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.9. Hazardous Materials Response Protocols Establish and maintain emergency response protocols to ensure that City staff and any other emergency responders are notified immediately if there is a hazardous materials or waste release, or if another emergency situation poses the significant chance of such a release occurring. Departments: Fire, Police Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.10. Methane Overlay Districts Continue to evaluate the locations and concentrations of soils that may contain methane, and adjust the boundaries of the Methane Overlay Districts as needed. Continue to require methane testing and appropriate mitigation activities prior to any new development in aPb I Methane Overlay District, including methane isolation barriers, collection systems, and vent systems. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-47 FIB -425- Item 10. - 103 Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.28. Hazardous Materials Source Reduction Coordinate with industry representatives, researchers, and government agencies to identify cost-effective ways for businesses to reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated by normal operations, and encourage businesses to adopt these methods as part of their regular practice. Publicly recognize businesses that successfully reduce the amount of hazardous waste produced. Departments: Fire, Office of Business Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.29. Hazardous Materials Coordination Continue to coordinate with federal state, and countyeeen#yw4de agencies on hazardous materials and waste programs, including site selection and screening for hazardous waste management facilities, household hazardous waste collection efforts, sharing and standardization of hazardous materials and waste data, and comprehensive emergency response actions for spills and illegal dumping of hazardous materials and waste. Departments: Fire, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P 30 Regional Aircraft Operation and Hazards Coordination Continue to coordinate with regional agencies to ensure local land use plans are consistent with the safe and effective operation of airports and helipads, and that City emergency response plans address the potential hazards associated with aircraft. Departments: Planning Division, Fire Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 8-54 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) Item 10. - 104 HB -426- F • Offer free emergency planning and response classes, including participation in _ Community Emergency Response Teams training, to Huntington Beach community I = members. • Distribute information about possible risks in Huntington Beach, ways to reduce risk, and effective post-emergency recovery strategies to community members through in- person events, online, and in print and electronic media in multiple languages, including Spanish, Vietnamese, and Chinese. • Work with local businesses to prepare workplace emergency plans, and to conduct - regular drills-and other preparatory exercises for emergency situations. • Work with the school districts to educate schoolchildren about ways to prepare for emergency situations, and to coordinate school emergency plans with City plans. OUT Consider shelter in place provisions, evacuation needs, provisions for school closure, and consistency with City and regional shelter plans. Develop emergency education programs for elderly and disabled persons, in collaboration with medical providers, residential care workers, and other supportive organizations. • Ensure that City evacuation plans include provisions for the safe and efficient evacuation of individuals with limited mobility, including elderly residents and persons with disabilities. • Continue to have the Huntington Beach Fire Department sponsor the Senior Home Inspection Program, (Proiect SHIP), where volunteers conduct free home fire safety inspections for seniors in the city which can provide free smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors as funding is available.. Departments: Fire, Police Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing HAZ-P.35. Neighborhood-Based Coastal Resiliency Task Forces Convene neighborhood specific coastal resiliency task forces, or utilize existing neighborhood specific groups and committees to vet and implement resilience strategies that balance the diverse stakeholder interests. Prioritize neighborhoods with highly vulnerable communities and assets such as Huntington Harbour and Sunset Beach and include community members, City staff, and relevant stakeholders such as Caltrans, h Southern California Edison, Sunset Beach Sanitary District, homeowners associations, and the County of Orange. Departments: Planning Division, Public Works yw Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source:.General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 8-56 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 1413 -427- Item 10. - 105 NOISe Element City Flans, Ordinances, and Programs N-P.1. Noise-Mitigating Design Guidelines Establish design guidelines for residential, commercial, industrial, and mixed-use structures that respond to noise concerns. Provide the guidelines to developers at an appropriate time during the development review process. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General fund, development fees Time Frame: Guidelines established by 2020, ongoing implementation N-P.2. Industrial Hours of Operation Update the Municipal Code to establish and enforce appropriate hours of operation for industrial activities that maywith the potential to result in excessive noise with potential to disturb noise-sensitive land uses. Such activities include, but are not limited to, mechanical operations and truck deliveries. Departments: Community Development, Police Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General fund Time Frame: Code updates completed by 2020, ongoing implementation and enforcement N-P.3. Noise Ordinance Updates Update the Noise Ordinance regularly on a cycle of no more than every 10 years. During each update, conduct the following: O Monitor on-the-ground conditions in areas of existing or likely noise-related conflict. • Conduct public outreach. Evaluate the adequacy of enforcement mechanisms, and implement a system for tracking and monitoring locations where known or repetitive violations of noise standards have occurred or in locations where excessive noise disproportionately impacts disadvantaged communities.. a C -Identify specific exterior noise standards for industrial and commercial properties located adjacent to sensitive land uses, and incorporate project design features that City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-57 Item 10. - 106 xB -428- �� reduce noise conflicts between industrial and commercial properties and sensitive land uses. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: General fund Time Frame: Every 10 years, ongoing x Capital ovements " N-P 4 Noise Barrier Construction Funding 6P r x Secure funding to support construction of noise barriers to protect private outdoor yard areas along arterial roadways where existing homes are exposed to noise levels above the standards identified in Noise Element Table N-2. Develop a priority program for the construction of such barriers. Department: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption ' Funding Sources: General fund, grant funding Time Frame: Ongoing Development Review Requirements N-P.5. Construction Hours Enforce the following requirements during environmental review of proposed projects: ® Limit construction activities that would produce an hourly L�q above 85 dBA to between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. if such activities are proposed to occur within 100 feet of identified noise-sensitive uses. o Alternative mitigation may be considered for projects that would require pile driving or nighttime activities such as pumping or truck hauling. Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing j N-P.6.Acoustical Studies ; Acoustical studies will be required for all discretionary projects where any of the following conditions apply: 8_5g City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) xB -429- Item 10. - 107 • The proposed project includes a noise-sensitive land use that is located within the existing or future (Figure N-2) 65 dBA CNEL contour for transportation noise sources. • The proposed project will cause future traffic volumes to increase by 25 percent or E more on any roadway that fronts a sensitive land use. • The proposed project will expose a noise-sensitive land use to a stationary noise source or vibration source exceeding the standards outlined in the Noise Ordinance. Such stationary sources may include mechanical equipment operations, entertainment venues, and industrial facilities. b a� • The proposed project includes a noise-sensitive land use in the vicinity of existing or proposed commercial and industrial areas. • The proposed project is a mixed-use development that includes a residential component. The focus of this type of acoustical study is to determine likely interior and exterior noise levels and to recommend appropriate design features to reduce noise. An acoustical analysis prepared in accordance with the Noise Element and the Huntington r,I �3 ri Beach Noise Ordinance (Section 8.40 of the Municipal Code) shall. ' • Be the financial responsibility of the applicant seeking City approval of a project_; • Be prepared by a qualified person experienced in the fields of environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics--- • Include representative noise level measurements with sufficient sampling periods and locations to adequately describe local conditions and predominant noise sources_; ' Nnoise level measurements must be conducted at the time of greatest potential for s noise level increases above baseline conditions or allowed b law. aw.; • Estimate existing and projected cumulative noise in terms of CNEL or L.Q, and compare those noise levels to Noise Element standards and policies. • Recommend appropriate mitigation to achieve compliance with Noise Element policies ' and standards. Where the noise source in question consists of intermittent single �� events,the report must address the effects of maximum noise levels in sleeping rooms in terms of possible sleep disturbanced_ • Estimate noise exposure after the prescribed mitigation measures have been implemented. Departments: Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Source: Development fees Time Frame: Ongoing City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-59 Item 10. - 108 HB -430- public . e lervices City Plans, Ordinances, and Programs = PSI-P 1 Related Programs and Governmental Agencies I Continue to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local programs and regulations, , including but not limited to the following: r" • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) • Municipal Separate Storm Water System Permit Program r • Groundwater Management Act • California Public Resources Code • California Water Code • California Urban Water Management Planning Act • California Integrated Waste Management Act P tt4 IL • California Education Code • Orange County NPDES Municipal Storm Water Permit Departments: Community Development, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided hollowing adoption Funding Source: General Fund, development fees Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P 2 Fire and Emergency Response Performance Objectives Adopt locally defined performance objectives for fire, marine safety, and emergency response. Track compliance with adopted performance goals for fire and emergency w ' medical services quarterly and report the information annually to the City Council and " community residents. Use annual report results to modify and better locate fire resources (e.g., stations, equipment, personnel) to meet established emergency response performance objectives. = Annually evaluate fire department staffing levels and workload projections, and modify the ` Capital Improvement Program and operations plans, as necessary, to ensure facilities, i— equipment, and personnel meet established performance objectives. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-61 14B -43 1- Item 10. - 109 Department: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund P Time Frame: Municipal Code revisions completed by 2020 PSI-P 7 Public Library Facilities Plan Establish and implement a public library facilities plan to: • Ensure the library system both meets California State Library recommended standards - and adequately serves community needs. 5 • Explore withE_• e local school districts the use of school libraries serving as City °p9 n�. library satellites. • Continue to support after-school programs, job training programs, workshops, and other activities. • Expand library outreach services for seniors and others who are physically unable to visit library facilities. ' ` ma`s • Explore all funding and grant options available to support upgrading library facilities and amenities; support library efforts to incorporate the best technology and facilities; and support technology and facility upgrade efforts in libraries to ensure community members have access to state-of-the-art amenities. Department: Library Services Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund 4 Time Frame: Facilities plan completed by 2020 � 0 PSI-P.8. Development Feesx Perform a nexus fee study and revise City development fees to ensure that new development and reuse projects pay for a fair share of public infrastructure in a manner coordinated with improvements identified in the City's infrastructure management plans. Departments: Community Development, Public Works, Fire, Police, Library Services, ° Community Services r: Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Complete nexus fee study by 2020, update fees annually ate; : PSI-P.9. Police Department Annually review police department staffing levels and workload projections and modify the Capital Improvement Program and operations plans, as necessary, to ensure facilities, a a equipment, and personnel meet established performance objectives. Annually evaluate S City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-63 Item 10. - 110 HB _43)2- crime trends and police services, facilities, personnel, and response times relative to community needs and established state and federal standards. Departments: Police Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing, annually PSI-P.10. Special Events Review special events for the need to coordinate enhanced solid waste removal and police protection in conjunction with the permitting process. Identify fees associated with additional costs to be paid by event sponsors. Departments: Community Services Beach Division, Police Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund, user fees Time Frame: Fee structure based on individual agreements or as events are proposed PSI-P 11 Public Service and Infrastructure Improvements Continue to adopt and update the City's operating budget to maintain adequate public services, facilities, and infrastructure, exceed national averages, and coordinate development of community facilities and amenities and capital projects. Evaluate the cost- effective provision of public services and seek innovative funding sources to provide � services and maintain and upgrade existing infrastructure systems to counteract F: decreasing federal, state, and county funding sources, including grants, infrastructure financing districts, and other sources. Department: Public Works Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund, federal, state and county funds; grants, infrastructure financing districts Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.12. Infrastructure Technology Expand infrastructure technology in Huntington Beach by: - Partnering with local utility and telecommunication companies to coordinate and implement the most advanced and effective infrastructure technology possible. s Ensuring that budgeting for police, fire, and EMS services enables procurement of the most advanced technology accessible to aid in these services. 8-64 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -433- Item 10. - 1 1 1 • Encouraging and facilitating the installation of fiber optic internet service starting in the i{ Research and Technology designated industrial areas. • Evaluate a comprehensive information systems platform based on geospatial reckoning across all City departments to keep residents informed, r� gp Departments: Public Works, Fire, Police, City Manager's Office Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.13. Recycling and Composting In coordination with the City's waste hauler, build on existing waste collection and reduction programs to support California's goal of a 75 percent recycling rate by 2020 and to support long-term zero-waste efforts. Develop a composting program for commercial businesses, and expand participation to include single-family and multifamily residences as feasible. Identify materials that cannot be easily recycled or composted in Huntington Beach, and develop strategies that allow for effective diversion of these items. Improve the amount of construction and demolition (C&D) waste recycled in the community, and establish minimum diversion criteria that exceed state requirements for all future waste hauler contracts. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund i Time Frame: Ongoing Capital Improvements PSI-P.14. Capital Improvement Program Use the City's 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process to prioritize, fund, and build required infrastructure and public facility improvements, including: • Wastewater collection facilities • Water supply and distribution facilities • Water storage and transmission facilities • Storm drain and flood control facilities Use public capital resources in combination with private financing sources and seek I regional, state, and federal funds to supplement local funding of infrastructure projects listed in the CIP. City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-65 Item 10. - 11.2 HB -434- = I Department: Public Works Community Development Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: Enterprise funds, service fees, impact fees, grants, General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing 4= PSI-P.15. Storm Drain Improvements Design, preserve, and acquire land for water storage and transmission facilities, storm drain, and flood facilities. Provide for the construction of necessary pump and storage facilities to ensure adequate water supply and proper water system balance and the installation of stormwater drain gates. Evaluate existing environmental degradation or potential degradation from current or planned storm drain and flood control facilities in wetlands or other sensitive environments. Departments: Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: Impact fees, grants, General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P 16 Installation of Trash and Recycling Receptacles Design and install additional trash and recycling receptacles in public areas, including but y, not limited to Downtown, Beach Boulevard, City parks, and along the beach. Departments: Community Services, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: 2020 Development Review Requirements PSI-P.17. Development Review Through the development and design review processes for new development and reuse projects, require or continue to require the following: That sufficient utility and water capacity is available. If sufficient capacity is not currently available, additional capacity or adequate mitigation shall be provided by the project. • Use of energy- and water-efficient fixtures and design elements to the maximum extent r feasible consistent with City codes and policies. � • Use of drought-tolerant and native landscaping to the maximum extent feasible consistent with City codes and policies. • Adequate receptacles for trash, recycling, and composting, as applicable. 8-66 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -435- Item 10. - 113 o Completion of studies to determine water and sewer right-of-way and infrastructure requirements for future development projects, including that study recommendations be incorporated into the design of proposed projects. Payment of costs associated r with providing new and improving wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste services WF. shall be the responsibility of the project applicant. " • Incorporation of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)techniques into site planning and architectural design including territoriality, natural surveillance, _ activity support, and access control ® Adequate street widths and clearance for emergency access and the provision of all appropriate safety features. 9 Evaluate the need for additional technology infrastructure in building design, both from the street and within the building. Continue to consult with the fire and police departments and utility providers to: ® Evaluate the need for additional fire and police facilities or resources to serve new development projects during the development review process. • Evaluate the need for safety features when improving streets and critical intersections. ® Ensure capacity and infrastructure is adequate for the projected demand. Departments: Community Development, Fire, Police, Public Works Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing PSI-P.18. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Require new development and reuse projects to submit plans to demonstrate compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, including =_ but not limited to: t` ® Mitigation of pollutant flows. 0 Limitation of impervious surfaces. i Preservation and usage of natural filtration systems such as wetlands and bioswales. • Provision of on-site infiltration and runoff, as well as temporary on-site retention areas. • Limitation of disturbance to natural bodies of water, drainage systems, and highly erodible areas. C Use of pollution prevention measures, source controls, and treatment strategies. 9 Implementation of erosion protection during and after construction. ` City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) 8-67 Item 10. - 114 HB -436- Department. Public 11Vorks, Community Development VP Related Policies: To be provided following adoption l; Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing ray aInterjurisdictional Coordination - PSI-P.19. Regional Coordination Coordinate with regional agencies, surrounding jurisdictions, and service providers on actions including: jAx Coordinating the installation or renovation of infrastructure to ensure compliance with regional plans and uninterrupted continuation of services across jurisdictional borders. Maintaining an updated list of nonprofit organizations and interested parties, and ensuring they are included in planning decisions. • Working with state safety personnel to coordinate emergency response and safety efforts, Departments: Community Development, Public Works, City Manager's Office j Related Policies: To be provided following adoption Funding Sources: General Fund Time Frame: Ongoing s PSI-P.24. School District Coordination r Meet with local school districts to ensure continued coordination of maintenance and operations for the use of school facilities for public recreational activities, and the use of City parks for school educational purposes, Department: Community Services, City Manager's Office y Related Policies: To be provided following adoption N �' Funding Sources: General Fund F— Time Frame: Ongoing Publicn r ion and Outreach PSI-P.21. Community-Based Crime Prevention . Offer advice and support to community-based crime prevention efforts by neighborhood groups and civic organizations, Specific efforts may include, but are not limited to: 8-68 City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Draft, September 2017) HB -437- Item 10. - 115 ATTAC H M E N T #3 wK6 n' n d y. I August 14, 2017 wmylennedycaumtissiorLorg 17701 Cowan Ave.,Suite 2q0 Irvine,CA 92614 949 250 0909 Fw;949 263 0647 Chair Connie Mandic and Planning Commission Members City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Comments on Huntington Beach's General Plan Update-Land Use Element Dear Chair Mandic and Planning Commission Members: The.Kennedy Commission(the Commission)is a coalition of residents and community organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families eariiing less than $20,000 annually in Orange County. Formed in 2001,the Commission has been successful in partnering with Orange County jurisdictions to create effective housing policies that have led to the new construction of homes affordable to lower income working families. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the City of Huntington Beach's General Plan Update. We have reviewed the draft and are submitting this letter to provide public comments. As the City moves forward with the update,the Commission urges the City to continue its support for the development of affordable homes and consider the following: l, Revise Goal LU-4 Policy A to read as: Encourage a mix of residential types to accommodate people with diverse housing needs at all income levels. 1 i 2. Revise Goal LU-4 Policy E to read as: Encourage housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community to be located in proximity to employment to reduce vehicle -riles traveled. 3. Include a stand-alone policy under Goal LU-4: Encourage the development of affordable homes for lower income households and workers in the City. 4. Ensure the update of the General Plan is consistent with the Housing Element pursuant.to Section 65300,5 of the State Government Code. Ranked among the top ten least affordable metropolitan areas in the country, Orange County is suffering from an affordable housing crisis. A resident must earn at.least$34.87 per hour to afford a two-bedroom apartment at a fair market rent of$1,813 a month.' As rents and the number of residents needing affordable homes have continually increased, the number of affordable homes being built for lower income households has not kept up with the demand. An additional 109,965 affordable rental homes are needed to address Orange County's housing I needs for lower income renters.'- ; 'Out or Reach 2017-The High Cost of Housing,National Low Income Housing Coalition,p.38,2017. 2 Change Co%%nty Renters in Crisis'A Call rnr Action,California Housing i'artnership Corporation,p.I.May 2017, a 1 Item 8. - 399 - "B -614- ® = Item 10. - 116 HB -438- Chair Mandic and Planning Commission Members August 14, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Burdened by the High cost of housing, on a single night in January 2017, nearly 4,800 people experienced homelessness in Orange County.' The need to address this crisis is urgent, especially for homeless children. During the 2015 to 2016 school year, 28,450 students in grades Pre-K through 12t1' grade were identified as homeless living in unstable envirortments in the Orange Count), school districts.4 In addition, according to the recent release of the Cost Study of Homelessness, close to $300 million was spent to address homelessness in Orange County during 2014 to 2015.5 Studies have shown that affordable housing coupled with supportive services is a cost-efficient intervention that will safely house individuals experiencing chronic homelessness. With high housing costs and significant lack of affordable homes, many workers and families, especially those who earn lower wages, struggle financially to live in the city they work in. These impacts not only hurt workers and families but may also impact the city's economic competitiveness and attractiveness to major employers to provide jobs. Locating homes, specifically affordable homes, near transit,job centers and neighborhood services will decrease travel costs and allow individuals to save money and spend it elsewhere in the City. In particular, the environnmental impacts of a development are especially less drastic when a person can afford to live and spend their honey in the same conumnity in which they work in. In 2017, the average commute time to work for Orange County residents was approximately 30 minutes and approximately 87% of commuters drove alone,6 Improving location accessibility and connectivity reduces the dependency for residents, especially for lower income households and workers, to drive their automobiles. This will lead to decreased environmental impacts, such as vehicles miles traveled (VMT) and greerilzouse gas emissions, which will contribute to the project's overall purpose and intent to create a sustainable transit oriented neighborhood. The General Plan will also align with the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) and help the City implement and comply with SB 375 goals of reducing VMT and greenhouse gas emissions. Please keep us informed of any revisions, updates and meetings regarding the City's General Plan Update. If you have any questions, please contact me at (949) 250-0909 or cesarc@kennedycolmnission.org. Sincerely, Cesar Covarrubias Executive Director Orange County Point in Time Count 2017,County of Orange,May 2017. 'OC Community Indicators 2017,Children and Families Commission of orange County,p.34,May 2017, 5 Cost Study of Homelessness Executive Summary,Orange County United Way,Jamboree and University ofCalifosnia,Irvine,p.2,March 2017, Profile of Huntington Beach,Southern California Association of Governments,p,22,May 2017. HB _439_ Item 10. - 117 Mary Adams Urashima August 15, 2017 Huntington Beach, California RE: DRAFT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Chairman Mandic and Members of the Planning Commission: I object to the removal of the Historic and Cultural Resources Element from the General Plan Update as a key element—if that is what this draft proposes. The staff memorandum states this element being "reformatted" upon adoption of the draft General Plan Update. The language needs some clarification and explanation into the public record. This element should be retained in the General Plan. If my interpretation of staff's language in the staff report is not accurate, I am happy to be corrected. My comments are to place emphasis on the Historic and Cultural Resources Element as a key tool for creating balance in community development, use of natural resources, and environmental and infrastructure impacts. I also have concerns about the proposed land use designation of"Research and Technology" for the Historic Wintersburg property,which appears to have been added to the Gothard Street corridor. The designation appears to have no policy or land use support for heritage preservation. I ask the City recognize community planning is about people, not about maximizing revenue from every single square inch in an institutional fashion. There is a social cost to removing cultural and historic features; we are seeing some of that today in our community. There also is an economic cost relating to lack of affordable and creative space for emerging entrepreneurs, dwindling places to encourage the well-behaved visitors interested in heritage tourism, and clear consumer interest by younger generations in less institutional, more authentic, historic places. Thousands of dollars were spent by the City on an outside consultant, as well as hundreds of collective hours by local historians (including myself)to update the City's historic resources survey. Through that process—while we did finally adopt the Mills Act for homeowners and businesses to alleviate some out- of-pocket costs for their historic preservation efforts—I learned there is internal resistance to designating historic districts and developing a citywide historic preservation ordinance. What this means is the City is preventing itself from becoming a "certified local government" and then cannot be eiigiblefor otherfunds and grants that assist heritage preservation related development. The funding and economic development that can come from a citywide historic preservation ordinance— guided by a clear General Plan Historic and Cultural Resources Element—is successful in other cities. The mindset that heritage conservation and respect for cultural resources does not pay dividends is contradicted by countless real life examples. "Beach city identity and culture" (page 2 — 26) Huntington Beach is more than a "beach city" culture and identity, which clearly places emphasis on one geographic part of this City as well as one group of people. The Native American, pioneer settlement, 1 Item 10. - 118 HB -440- agricultural development, and historical periods that fostered pre-history settlement and trading with Catalina Island, tent cities and tent revivals, the establishment of missions, Civil War and World War II veteran history—just a few for example—are not recognized in a "beach city identity and culture" descriptor. I am reminded of the 1980s planning effort in Huntington Beach calling for a "Mediterranean theme". Please stop revising or editing the actual history and heritage of Huntington Beach. Communities are not enriched by perfectly aligned streets, mandated design, and a singular heritage. We are reducing the character to a very narrow focus. General Plan goals (page 2 — 32) The draft update includes a statement regarding protection of"community character", by "continuing to preserve historic and cultural resources related to that 'Surf City'identity, such as older neighborhoods and historic buildings." Again, the vague "Surf City identity" seems to favor one narrow aspect of local heritage. This goal is contradicted by removal of the Historic and Cultural Resources Element. It's a nice statement, but if you don't identify in the General Plan what is historic and cultural, and how it will be preserved,then it can easily be ignored. This City has destroyed well over half, if not three-quarters, of the structures and places identified in the 1986 historic resources survey. The draft goal states "continuing to preserve", which clearly has not always been the case with a Historic and Cultural Resources Element as a key element. How will this goal be achieved without priority placed on a Historic and Cultural Resources Element? Enhancing tourism and hospitality (page 2 —40) The draft General Plan Update appears to focus on the beach area, Central Park, and the wetlands, and events such as the U.S. Open of Surfing and the Surf City Half Marathon. I agree these are prime areas and wonderful events. However, the focus appears to be on mega events focused in the downtown or beach area. Not everything has to be supersized. The policy of goal LU—14 is "Encourage both coastal and inland visitor-serving uses to offer a wide spectrum of opportunities for residents and visitors." However,the draft Update does not indicate or attempt to identify other areas in this community that represent local history or heritage. We're missing the boat by ignoring other parts of town and other types of events. In Los Angeles,the Los Angeles Conservancy developed an online crowdsourcing effort called Survey LA. Each neighborhood has the opportunity to weigh in with what is important to their community identity and history. Through this effort, they have identified and learned more about local heritage in a manner that has encouraged adaptive reuse type development,tourism and community pride. We live in a time where issues such as vandalism, litter, loitering, and public safety are highly vocal concerns by residents.There is a sense of frustration that the elements that people care about are being eliminated in a process that places more weight on visitors than residents. What better way to encourage community pride than by an effort to identify and highlight what residents find important. 2 HB -441- Item 10. - 119 Infrastructure and "green" planning (page 4— 2) 1 am encouraged to see the recognition that the Historic and Cultural Resources Element is a companion element to the Environmental Resources and Conservation Element. Again, retaining the Historic and Cultural Resources Element as a key element of the General Plan is about more than historic preservation. It is about less wasteful,green development and careful management of impacts to infrastructure. High density over human-scale historic structures will create significant impacts to resources and infrastructure, not to mention traffic, air quality, and light and noise impacts. In resource conservation, "avoided" impacts are a tool that can also be used in urban planning. Research and Technology designation (page 2 -12) The draft plan creates a corridor for a "Research and Technology" designation,which is a linear area along Gothard Street,with the exception of carving out one 4% acre parcel. That parcel is the National Treasure historic site referred to as Historic Wintersburg. There are less than 100 National Treasure historic sites in the United States; Historic Wintersburg is the first and only one in Orange County. Both the National Park Service and the National Trust for Historic Preservation have stated the property is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The first time this property was noted as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places was over 30 years ago, by Caltrans in 1983. As this planning commission should know from the presentation at the July 17, 2017, City Council meeting by Historic Wintersburg and the Trust for Public Land,there is a current effort to purchase the property at market value for historic preservation as a heritage site and public park. The explanation in the draft plan is that Research and Technology will "promote provision of high- capacity data systems to support new development and reuse projects". The draft plan also explains this land use designation supports commercial and industrial uses, which are exactly the uses that prompted legal action in an earlier attempt at re-zoning. The draft Update's "statement of overriding considerations" makes the blanket statement that some historic resources may be impacted. The language on page 2—12 states the Research and Technology designation is "Industrial". It further states "the designation encourages both employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees while continuing to allow many traditional industrial uses such as manufacturing and production uses. Uses include clean and green manufacturing(e.g., medical devices, solar panels), research and development, technology, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, limited eating and drinking establishments that have an industrial component(e.g., a brewery), restaurants and cafes to accommodate employment uses and surrounding residential neighborhoods entertainment, and similar neighborhood commercial uses." We could be back where we started. You are essentially rezoning the property under the draft General Plan for commercial/industrial uses that previously were opposed. This creates additional complications in the middle of a process to purchase the property for historic preservation, something the property owner has stated they are open to. Historic preservation does not mean there cannot be 3 Item 10. - 120 HB -442- technological improvements and innovation; however,the designation of Research and Technology is appears to be not compatible with historic preservation and can lead to the destruction of significant historic resources. As the chair of the Historic Wintersburg Preservation Task Force,with a singular mission to save this National Treasure for future generations,there should be very clear, written explanation regarding why this parcel was singled out, what the Research and Technology designation is intended to do, and, how it supports the preservation of historic and cultural resources. The description for that land use designation does not support historic preservation or heritage park type uses. It leaves a lot of questions regarding the thought process and purpose of changing the land use. Without clarification in writing regarding the intent and historic resources protections, I would oppose the designation. It is unclear how it can be used and could be a tool for destruction of historic and cultural resources, contradictory to preservation of neighborhood character, and opening the door for higher density development with its associated impacts. Respectfully, Mary Adams Urashima Huntington Beach, California 4 HB -443- Item 10. - 121 Villasenor, Jennifer From: tony sellas[tony.sellas@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 10:32 PM To: Planning Commission Subject: Huntington Beach Circulation Element concerning Bike Classes Attachments: Huntington Beach Circulation Element concerning Bike Classes.pdf Dear Planning Commission, Please enter my presentation into the record for the 8/8/2017 Planting Study item A-1 (General Plan amendment). The May 2017 HB Circulation Element draft does not provide a traffic study for the proposed Class 1 Multi- Use Bike Path, Class 2 Bike lane, and Class 3 Bike Route. The City's Citizens should know what the final road design will be for the four-proposed road redesigns throughout the city. For example, does any of the three classes remove any lanes from the roads. Please see the attachment for further detail. Thank you for your service. Tony Sellas t Item 10. - 122 HB -444- 7,v I LtvLr Tlsr FGFnLet xc s.2ak11IISbtt Ati T' �� Ai1tiv,:IRII[e¢C Initiq]PVd ma a ItraN Using 0Teululiaa From the Stantec CondllivAsTeckmical Repr»: - 3+5 asl ,x Y sits �r ra T cSaud i dt".3+SBa: U :ae x [x Wu:Rwt[ � ra nl 11c r study it provides a traffic study for many 1 '-. � rr I 1;?a .Ir7 .r ur, * t!r slla 73 .t3• a �€° " .t a 07 W 91 .{; d1 MA [ :1 71i .23 intersections in the Si.. ! 14➢1 s3i Yj 'V IS' M ;1 ,1 city. Where are about nt [ b7 uss }? :sr, ns s ut 1 :I .m• 1• �A HgrdklglcadBPacltGenerAf4aR ;' kc-.. 30 pages of different f : e tr 1 a a 1 ur 7 €.0 a7 Al -4 ,a- intersect:on studies_ �It 3 I a, P e7 ss➢ .11 w CA 3� E.�Y31I �jf1 Qt . Si i r'� aG li .7t i47 ..1 add a :VI 11 .Is 1 .[t s 5ntt In the Draft May :�,-1' t sw .'_I• LP 71n tostircx sn P. lot .11• + nmvlcrtl ,IY ,1i• I.:x![n IK[w: Yam.P.raxa V41:p3Yt lwzlry 2017 HB Circulation PreparedJor to CU=*ZLW= s➢ # GD tn' GtyoEHunlKgloll3eaci Element does not emutaamr___Uam 4 d�.13�,.. provide any i � .. ..dr 1,WAJl111:1 sclu,u. P.ft-hSt1IWOA" rk' � � Intersection studies � � :law or etmtuaxs 1 i ,Si 41 i[144F e4,i KIM %I IF 11� Z rd M ;. for the proposed } s PP��//�1yy®®�q��yy". La�'UK Class I Multi-Use �j � h�p' ;x r air. x .0- n -s, 1 lViFV �s ,1• t P p Fait ry P� v :+91 > WX V. rt 3� .a Z1 Bike Path, Class 2 t g : I.,t r _�I Ina. 11w } 113; Bike lane and Class 3 �,.,. [ 1 11 ',I .T ;L I [D :0 1[ ' Sz 0zl ..'1 r too 3m n PI[ .H 11. Ill _LI 73 .Y. i?R ! I7A Yt .1 In .61 ! Bike Routes- Please +° 3 .IC ??L 1 1>•JP � dd` 110 ,61 4 Please see the next n ' c 7 >,1v< 19 Al 133 ,w M 3 3Ym I,m ss !d At- sii.". ? 1 Y U .6 f7 ,x iii I IID 0 1] t€ JI rA slide. �? . ��: € �� F.�!� [n ➢ Slf; tl6 .1:' P€: .'{ z33 ] iY7! 91Y1 Y'` p1 .P: t Y e 1 Itt! I`.1 .01 X .7P ev.. t 71a3 10 r< 10 A€ Vjx ft311 UNti11:'h7IIiA7G3Ii dYr .♦Y Iux.LiIP19tl ME= .R •i3 OexsmbRrE9.7AIJ 4�. . H� f�P CD V r^ W C� O i•) FI �: §q CIwsINIuI"-,,e6i1wPath rmrMearnep�n.r�.Ar+owrptirar- •..$ vtpice'mbnaorweefuxnuyara,.,tl � _ ...� rF� _.� i plA.RNa•f 1Y1@dou Ave6p muMltlis 11�,„ 3 4 Yam' The May 2017 HB �y t..ae.n,vnwwy+'7'.Vn^rn.mryat.n .. S Circulation Draft - `ram' � G�i•rs�9FaI.CC1.�%IyAFSd-sninnrY� dement does not �r provide traffic study �.... for the proposed . 1. a =� �...• .... .• .• .•. rF%NIRASII Multi UbE Bike Path, Class 7 Bike lane, and a Class29ike Lane nmaMsro,mpre wetanrswaeaYh6� � � •;� - - u.bten.nnMark Class 3 Bike Route. �a J r --f'8rre.s .� J m.dm.a+rrM.nrrarovn�drn+em The City's Citizens +• + i� .ra bc....,.m,...rnkrnr.an.r..rsaerrx-r.m we.ii a� Should know What the final road design �l i �w4.�npr�rRe•- u.i wx,awr.r.n �� { is for the four .� FB^'b'' i i a�w.�+pmrea rw+ve,r� a �e.nraee..er.rexr proposed road - w '; redesigns. Class393keRaake r.rmnsRm�,tl��mPrr _...rp a+w s, r----�-� rtN mater+ni4k5rtad6c. For example does w.®atirra.w � - any of the three .-- onercme g 7 Fn3< classes remove any lanes from the road. �xA AtAT 16$E �....wa.w.a �i Flat tAfE .�et�.x.+rr...dra�rrrn From the map sorrier' is errs aawmarcaau streets are not k s a 31i[e'a)P1am Firgu'e CIRC r�. clearly labeled. Why '�. = �.a, I ; ,... I.•:,..� d Not? arty of MT*glon anch C*uW Ran pmt J.ay an 3-73 3-24 \ � f� y 2017)Gdvof]•hu+ii oa Be�cA Gensrsf Plaa rf f,9a Villasenor, Jennifer From: Gino J. Bruno [gbruno@socal,rr.com} Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 10:43 AM To: Planning Commission? Cc: CITY COUNCIL; Wilson, Fred; Hass, Scott; Villasenor, Jennifer Subject: General Plan Update-EIR Commissioners: At your meeting tomorrow (Tuesday) evening, you will be presented with an overview of the draft General Plan Update, including the EIR, and you will be offering feedback on the topics to be discussed at upcoming study sessions. I urge you to consider, as a priority, a study session detailing the Transportation and Traffic section of the EIR (Section 4.14). 1 have commenced my review of the EIR, which includes the following projections and other matters that are important over the next 25 years [bracketed page numbers below reference the EIR]: 1. It is projected that there will be 7,228 more dwelling units added within the city. [p. 4.14-10) 2. It is projected that there will be approximately 5,384,920 square feet of nonresidential uses added. [p. 4.14-10] 3. Multi-family residential units will Increase from 40,201 to 48,790, or an increase of 21%. [p. 4.14-11] 4. Average daily traffic (ADT) related to schools will increase by 10%. [p. 4.14-11] 5. The General Plan Update would result in an increase of about 148,000 daily trips. [p. 4.14-11] 6. The EIR concludes that average daily traffic will increase by 9% over the next 25 years. [p. 4.14-10] T Only three intersections are recommended for reconfiguration to help alleviate (mitigate) current and future congestion, namely, Gothard & Center, Brookhurst&Adams, and Beach and Heil. [p. 4.14- 12, et seq.] 8. Despite the fact that the last General Plan Update was done in 1996, a conclusion has been reached in the EIR that the average daily traffic has DECREASED in the city since the year 2005 (with no comparison to 1996, nor source cited for any 2006 base-year figure). [p. 4.14-11 9. The EIR references and relies upon public transportation (OCTA), although press reports indicate that such public transportation ridership is down, and some routes discontinued or re-routed. [p. 4.14-5] 10. 'This analysis did NOT identify any effects found NOT to be significant for transportation/traffic resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update," (Emphasis supplied, and which statement I find unintelligible with the double negative. I read it to say, "This analysis DID identify effects found to be significant for transportation/traffic resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update.") [p. 4.14-9] Most troubling to me is the fact that, with all of the projections cited above, along with others, the EIR concludes, regarding Transportation and Traffic: HB -447- Item 10. - 125 "IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE WOULD NOT RESULT IN ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT REGARDING TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC, THUS, THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT OR UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS." [p. 4.14-231 Common sense, logic, personal observations, and bad past Huntington Beach experiences suggest to me that there will be a very significant adverse impact on transportation and traffic from the projected uses described in the General Plan Update that are NOT mitigated by this Report, and thus, I would hope you would ask for much more clarification on traffic in an upcoming Study Session. Thank you. Gino J. Bruno Huntington Beach Item 10. - 126 HB -448- Villasenor, Jennifer From: Dan Jamieson [broker advocate@hotmaii.com) Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 1:03 PM To: Villasenor, Jennifer Subject: GP update comments, for study session (also sent 7-7-17) Dear Planning Commission: Thank you for taking comment on the Huntington Beach(City) General Plan update(GPU). My suggested changes and comments follow. Specify Goals for Parks, Open Space,Trails The GPU should better explain park-service areas and buffers, and include a park-deficit analysis for each service area. (See, for e.g.,the Newport Beach GP and its narrative for park service areas. http://Nvww.newportbeachca.gov/PL`N/General Plan/09_Ch8_Recreation_web.pdf).The current draft GPU is unclear in this regard, and gives the City no guidance as to which areas of the City might be underserved by parks. The City should also maintain its current stated 5.4 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. The 5- acre goal sets too loin a bar, essentially giving the City permission to continue its high rate of development without adding any new parks or open space. The GPU should include an affirmative statement that the City will dedicate the appropriate developer fees for the acquisition of new parks and open space. Furthermore,the City's parkland acreage total should include just the first 100 feet of beach, similar to Newport:Beach's policy. The GPU should include language about improving public access to coastal areas, especially Huntington Harbor,where public access to the bay is severely limited. This should include enhanced access with waterfront public walkways, and protection from encroachments such as piers, floats,bulkheads and private/gated communities. The final GPU should also mention the planned improvement of the City-owned rail spur in North Huntington.Beach, previously the Navy railroad right-of-way(Navy ROW). The draft GPU notes that parts of HB -449- Item 10. - 127 the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way running east of Gothard Street is designated for a future transportation corridor. The Navy ROW nuns generally east-west and connects with this Union Pacific spur,which runs north- south. Since the Navy ROW is already abandoned, it should be a priority for improvement as part of a future regional multi-use trailway. Indeed,the City has planned and budgeted money for this very purpose. (The city of Westminster has similar plans for its section of the Navy ROW. Unfortunately, a misguided plan to store cars on the City portion of the Navy ROW seems to have delayed implementation of the trailway plan.) Ultimately, the Navy ROW spur and the Union Pacific right-of-way could connect into a much broader regional transportation system. Plus, an.improved Navy ROW would be a wonderful attraction for employees who work in and around the McDonnell Centre Business Park and desire a quick break from city life. All of these railroad right-of-way projects would support the General Plan's goal of preserving railroad right-of-ways and improving transportation and recreational opportunities. Consider Extending the new Research & Technology Zoning to the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan north of Bolsa Avenue. Promote Green Development. The GPU proposes a new land-use designation, Research and Technology(RT), to enable a broader mix of lower-intensity industrial and commercial uses to attract new, growing businesses to the City. The current GPU proposed RT zoning south of Bolsa Avenue only. However, implementing RT development in this area will require the turnover and redevelopment of individual parcels. This will be a slow, patchwork process, unlikely to create the kind of environment that cutting-edge employers will desire. In addition to a high-bandwidth infrastructure, these firms will want restaurants, entertainment and other visitor- serving and commercial amenities. Open areas for eating,meeting and breaks from the workday will also be desired. Additionally, walkways and bike trails would be key additions to attract tech firms. All of these amenities are in short supply south of Bolsa, or simply do not exist. Further,the existing parcels south of Balsa are generally small,raising the question of whether many of these parcels will be large enough to accommodate the light manufacturing planned for the RT area. However, as Boeing exits the McDonnell Centre Business Park(MCBP) area, most of its existing land will be available for redevelopment. As a result, the City should consider the MCBP area for the new RT zoning. Large-scale redevelopment in the MCBP will be a prime opportunity to "jump start" implementation of the new RT zoning on a sizeable and integrated parcel, and begin to attract the kind of high-growth, high-value businesses and jobs the City desires. Within the RT zoning in the current MCBP area,the City should consider a mix of shops and eating/drinking establishments, open areas,public walking and biking space, and recreational facilities. l generally support the concept outlined in LU-P.14 of the GPU, allowing housing in RT areas. Any housing should be compatible with the zoning. For example, industrial, loft-type housing,plugged into the high- bandwidth of the area, located above or incorporated with nonresidential buildings, could help attract high tech Item 10. - 128 HB -450- businesses and employees, the latter of which could walk or bike to work. The typical condos, townhornes and other multi-story residential units that litter much of-lie City now should not be built in RT-zoned parcels and would do nothing to distinguish RT-zoned areas. Please keep in mind that the MCBP area is the main entry point to the City's Northwest corner. The current Boeing facility has a recreation area with ball fields,tennis courts, a gym, basketball and volleyball courts, and landscaping including eucalyptus groves. The property makes a positive impression of the City as visitors enter. It would be a shrine if the campus-like setting of the current Boeing property was lost to more of the non-descript warehouses that exist north of the property. These look-alike warehouses are carbon copies of industrial properties that can be found anywhere in Southern California. Building more of these buildings at the Northwest gateway to the City would mark Huntington Beach as just another faceless, sprawling suburb,rather than the type of world-class research and technology center that the City envisions, The General Plan should promote green development, including in the MCBP and RT zoned land. This should include provisions for green, energy-efficient and self-sufficient buildings,use of native plants and water-wise landscaping,prohibitions on the use of the wasteful turf slopes used by many commercial buildings, and inclusion of public open areas and walkways/trails within any development plans. Green development will help attract clean and green manufacturing. Finally,please note that the Northwest Industrial Subarea is also bordered by residential areas to the north(Spa Drive and surrounding streets). This fact should be incorporated into the GPU. The draft GPU says the area is bordered to the north by commercial developments and the 405 freeway. Sincerely, Dan Jamieson Huntington Beach HB -451- Item 10. - 129 Villasenor, Jennifer From: Larkin [wslarkin@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:39 AM To: Villasenor, Jennifer, Setneta, Lyn; Peterson, Erik: emandic@surfcity-hb.org; Hopkins,Travis Subject: HB General Plan Updates Hi Jennifer, I wanted to follow up on our earlier email exchange regarding a summary of the proposed changes/ input to the HB General Plan from the last HB Planning review. I wanted review the commentary/changes proposed by the Planning Commission to check what I thought I heard and gauge what might be coming forth into the GP document. Of particular interest is the language/changes being drafted in the HB General Plan regarding HB's mineral rights/leases and more importantly,the language regarding the GP's guidance and actions regarding a potential sea level/tide encroachment into the low level lands in HB and the Harbor area. There was some commentary by one of the planning commissioners that had me concerned that language within the GP could lead to HB taking a passive role on rising tides with a'nature taking its course' approach, resulting in HB homeowners in the harbor and low lying areas exposed to rising sea levels with a GP policy that hadn't been fully explained or understood by those affected. In regards to the mineral/ oil leases,I was also concerned with some commentary from the planning commission that language in the GP should discourage new leases. Considering HB is challenged with the revenues vs current expenditures(not to mention future needs, especially infrastructure),why would we want to draft language that discourages or handcuffs HB's ability to derive revenue from any of its resources? As long as we insure environmental safeguards, policies are in place we should insure we leave all the doors open as no one can proj ect what the needs, demands and opportunities might exist 30 years from now. To that end,just as we should be environmentally responsible,we should be fiscally responsible and be careful in not bracketing in;our options going forward. No doubt I may be off from what I might of heard during the meeting vs what was said,hence my wanting to review a summary. If you have a chance to shoot me a copy,it would be greatly appreciated. As an FYI, you've probably already seen this recent article,but just in case,here's a link. https://www.google.com/amplwww.ocregister.corr/2017/07/12/scientists-predict-parts-of southern-califoi7iia- could-face-chronic-floodixig-from-rising-sea-levels/amp/ Lastly, I did notice within the GP, (similar to the last one),if somone wasn't familiar with HB,you almost wouldn't notice that HB Harbor existed. It's almost like a footnote( along with.Sunset Beach.). There is lots to say about the Belle Terra and HB Pier areas, but I think I got to page 10 before the harbor was even mentioned. Ltem 10. - 130 KB -452- Considering this is a 30 year plan., it scents that the harbor area and Sunset are remaining in the backwaters for a longer time than necessary (at least in regards to ties to a larger a larger FHB development or promotion vision). It would be great to see or discuss some General thoughts on this. Thanks in advance Bill Larkin HB Public Works Commissioner 949-310-5118 Sent from my Whone HB -453- Item 10. - 131 Villasenor, Jennifer From: Gino J. Bruno[gbrunoa@socal.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 2:46 PM To: Planning Commission Cc: CITY COUNCIL; Wilson, Fred; Hess, Scott; Villasenor, Jennifer Subject: General Plan Update- EIR Commissioners: At your meeting this Tuesday evening, you will be presented with a focus on the Transportation and Traffic section of the General Plan Update's supporting EIR. [Bracketed page numbers below reference the EIR]: 1. It is projected that there will be 7,228 more dwelling units added within the city. [p. 4.14-10] 2. It is projected that there will be approximately 5,384,920 square feet of nonresidential uses added. [p. 4,14-10] 3. Multi-family residential units will increase from 40,201 to 48,790, or an increase of 21%, [p. 4.14-11] 4. Average daily traffic (ADT) related to schools will increase by 10%. [p. 4.14-11] 5. The General Plan Update would result in an increase of about 148,000 daily trips. [p. 4.14-11] 6. Average daily traffic will increase by 9% over the next 25 years. [p. 4.14-10] 7. Only three intersections are recommended for reconfiguration to help alleviate (mitigate) current and future congestion, namely, Gothard & Center, Brookhurst& Adams, and Beach & Heil. [p. 4.14-12, et seq.] 8. The EIR references and relies upon public transportation (OCTA), although press reports indicate that such public transportation ridership is down, and some routes discontinued or re-routed. [p. 4.14-5] Considering those findings and conclusions by the authors of the EIR, do you question the EIR conclusion that, regarding Transportation and Traffic: "IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE WOULD NOT RESULT IN ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT REGARDING TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC; THUS, THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT OR UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS." [p. 4.14-231 Common sense, logic, personal observations, and bad past Huntington Beach experiences suggest to me that of course there will be a very significant adverse impact on transportation and traffic from the projected uses described in the General Plan Update that are NOT mitigated by this Report. Thank you. Gino J. Bruno Huntington Beach Item 10. - 132 HB -454- Villasenor, Jennifer From: Kalmick, Dan Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:23 AM To: Villasenor, Jennifer; James, Jane Cc: Hess, Scott;Vigliotta, Mike Subject: FW: General, Plan Update-EIR Hi, I'd like to have the following email chain entered as late communication.The following is an email conversation from last month whereby I thoroughly answer all of these same questions. Dan Kalmick, Past Chair Huntington Beach Planning Commission Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org (562)397 3635 From: Kalmick, Dan Sent: Monday,June 12, 2017 7:23 PM To- 'Gino J. Bruno'<gbruno@socal.rr.com> Subject: RE: General Plan Update - EIR Hey Gino, I'm running out of time today, but I wanted to quickly respond to your points and hopefully point you in some directions for some more information. But let's grab a coffee soon! I want to better understand where you're coming from and also see if I can explain a little bit more about my public policy position.You've taken a few shots at me on Facebook with some assumptions that aren't true.Obviously I think we have some disagreements on role of government but I think you've thrown me over the cliff on a lot of issues I think we agree on beforeyou even know what my opinion is on them. 1. Right. 2. 1 honestly haven't gotten to the transportation section yet. I haven't evaluated the traffic counts nor the methodology. If you took my information below to be anything more than informational or explanatory, I apologize. If you'd like to know what I think,just ask :) 3. The data doesn't support this for all primary and secondary intersections (at least in March of 2014). See 2014 Traffic Counts http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/files/users/planning/Volume-111- Appendix-B-Circulation-Traffic-Study.pdf Page 30 and 31.Then go onto Page 60 and 61 to see the impacts 2040 and assumes build out of the current BESCP with all mitigation measures. I haven't gotten into this to check for consistency when being brought forward to the EIR.The raw traffic counts are in the back. 5) OCTA is a mess right now.They're looking into anything and everything to stop the slide in ridership (I'm Vice Chair of OCTA's Citizens Advisory Committee...I go to a lot of transit meetings). I think you'll see on demand ride sharing services start to take over for the less used bus routes (already a pilot in San Clemente). I'll have to dig into the EIR, but I'm pretty sure they don't assume massive public transit to offset VMT. I'm hopeful that Autonomous Vehicles will help alleviate traffic(and parking).The safety technology alone is pretty cool. My new car has adaptive cruise control and it's pretty hairy going from 65mph to zero without touching the brakes. 6) 1 agree, everyone thinks that traffic is the worst.This is what the EIR comment period is for. If you can draw a clear line from the narrative to the conclusions not being supported by documentation within the appendices then you have a solid argument that'll have to be addressed in the response to comments. Unfortunately,th` — H13 -455- Item 10. - 133 mooted by a Statement of overriding Consideration even if the EIR came back and said yes,there are Significant and Unavoidable Impacts.In fact, there are several already that will be required for this EIR:Air Quality, Cultural Resources,GHGs, Noise and Utilities and Service Systems. 7) 1 was making joke. Sorry. 8) yah, no idea on this one. I think someone was trying to be too smart 9) Mitigation measures, probably not. Policies...absolutely!This was why there was a GPAC and public outreach and comments period.The City wanted people to create visions for what the City was and then policies to help guide the zoning code and future projects. In order to not approve a project as being,for example too dense or inappropriate use, we have to find it inconsistent with polices in the General Plan.That's the nexus. If the General Plan doesn't include polices that limit growth then projects can't be denied. (also..$1.2mil collected from developer fees over the last several years..c'mon...I thought we all went over that when we started this 3 years ago) 10) Developer Fees are absolutely a lever the City can pull.We have a number of fees I'm sure you're already familiar with, but getting as much public benefit our a project as the City can is worth looking into. I'm not sure where I've come across with my position on the GPU, I only finished my first pass last week and I'm barely though the EIR. I've been trying to explain how the EIR process works or how it came to those conclusions as well as cite some additional resources. I haven't yet come to a conclusion yet on this process. I just submitted about 6 pages of notes and questions to staff on the GPU, suggesting adding, strengthening,weakening and removing polices. So I still haven't gotten my arms around it. I hope that you'll continue to comment as we go forward as your input is what helps to make the General Plan represent everyone's point of view. Have a great night Ginol And let's meet up when you have some time. Thanks[ Dan Kalmick, Past Chair Huntington Beach Planning Commission Dan.Kalmick@surfcityr_-hb.orr (562)397-3635 From:Gino J. Bruno [mailto:gbruno@socal.rr.com] Sent. Monday,June 12, 2017 2:54 PM To: Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Ka[mick9surfc[ty-hb.org> Subject: RE:General Plan Update- EIR Dan, 1. The proposed GPU is for a general city-wide plan, and not a "no project" alternative. 2. It's clear to me that you agree with the EIR conclusion that ADT has decreased, city-wide, between 2005 and 2014. Respectfully, I doubt that many residents who drive around this city would agree. 3. The LOS at many key intersections are rated "F" I believe, and there is no mitigation proposed here, except for the three cited intersections. 4. The HBTM was established in 2009, before the BECSP was adopted, but is apparently heavily relied upon in this EIR. From the traffic congestion we see all around town, it is unfuzzy to me that the 2009 HBTM was a failure, and the handful of roadway configuration changes that you reference are relatively insignificant in mitigating the adverse traffic impact of the BECSP and its brethren. Item 10. - 134 HB -456- 6. According to news reports, there is little chance that OCTA (currently losing ridership and which is revamping its routes to accommodate)will add buses or vanpools, and yet the EIR blindly assumes it will. 6. 1 do not find the EIR "an unreadable legal document." What I find is the conclusions are not supported by the narrative (nor by the facts on the ground, experienced by virtually everyone who drives this city). 7. To me, "there are no significant or unavoidable impacts" is pretty "emphatic" although you may find it laughable or the language not to your liking. I don't find much wiggle room in that statement, so, to me, it's emphatic. You may enjoy a differing definition. 8. And, on the subject of the meaning of words, please tell me what this sentence means: "This analysis did not identify any effects found not to be significant for transportation/traffic resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update." [p.4.14-9] I learned that two negatives create a positive in language. Agree? 9. Regarding your proposal that I "suggest mitigation measures or policies," let's be clear here— it's not my job to suggest mitigation measures or policies. It seems to me that would have been the job of the company to whom the city paid $2 million; and in my view, it has failed so to do. 10.And regarding measures to decrease buildout, you might check this morning's Los Angeles Times article, that discusses adding a new"developer fee," the proceeds from which would go to help the homeless (or so they say). One of the arguments against the new fee is that it would stifle development. Your position on this GPU proposal is clear to me, and I'm sure mine is clear to you, and the two appear irreconcilable. Yes, I do plan to attend the PC meeting . . . Gino From: Kalmick, Dan imailto:Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org) Sent: Monday,June 12,2017 12:35 PM To: Gino J. Bruno<gbruno@socal.rr.com> Subject: RE:General Plan Update- EIR Good questions: This GPU actually decreases development from the No Project alternative(check out EIR page [5-101),that is to say if we keep the current General Plan's Land Use Element. So the way CEQA evaluates traffic is based on LOS (it also looks at VMT but for the sake of simplicity let's use LOS). LOS is of course Level of Service.The City set its threshold for each intersection.The traffic model is run with an ADT increase of 148,000 cars(or whatever the number is) and then they do traffic mitigation (widening Intersections, adding turn lanes).Then run the model again and took at LOS at intersections, Essentially what "no significant impacts" means is that the intersections still function at or below the standard with 9%traffic increase and full implementation of all mitigation measures. Unfortunately some of these mitigation measures will never get built(see next paragraph) BESCP has a full list of intersection mitigation measures that would be completed at full build out (http://www.huntingtonbeachca.pov/files/users/planning/Beach-Edinger-Corridors-Specific-Plan2015-Amended-Final- Adopted.pdf- start on page 130). Some have already been implemented. Northbound#4 on Beach Blvd at Edinger now goes through instead of ending(I live right here and it's made a HUGE difference). Eastbound right turn lane at Edinger HB -457- Item 10. - 1,35 and Beach to go SB Beach Blvd will be extended all the way in front of the new Marriott once construction is finished, The City looked at the Beach and Warner right turn pocket(Westbound to Northbound) but updated the traffic counts and it didn't need it so they couldn't use the Measure M match for the Traffic Mitigation funding money.The rest of the mitigation measures get implemented as projects come forward and pay their fair share. Do note that less than half of the EiR evaluated projects came online in the BECSP so full mitigation money hasn't been paid.There are a few other projects in C1P this year from mitigation money.The 405 expansion project(don't get me started on that nightmare)will actually implement a few more just by design. Personally, I think LOS is outdated and VMT along with its mitigation will be much more realistic in mitigating projects. If you have 4 buildings on an intersection and the LOS mitigation is to add a turn pocket, but that'll never happen because the buildings will never move, then you have mitigation on paper only.VMT mitigation goes to things like add buses and va npools(funding transit)that can actually take cars off the road (I'm not saying that this actually happens...but at least it's better than NEVER getting a turn pocket unless there's a massive earthquake). Keep in mind that the EIR is an unreadable legal document.So its terminology isn't emotional.You made me laugh when you used the word "emphatically" below.The metrics for the E1R evaluation for Significant, Less than Significant and Not Significant are defined terms based on standards the City, County, State and Feds set, And this is a Program EIR not a Project EIR so there is no specific project outlined (This frustrates me to no end when trying to figure out mitigation measures) and thus there are outs since the EIR just has to assume 1.7% in five year increments until 2040 at allowed densities and FARs. I think that everyone would prefer it to overestimate and therefore require more mitigation for traffic and growth than to underestimate and then not have any legal standing to require the mitigation in the future, Now...here's where you can have a direct impact.Suggest mitigation measures or policies that would have the potential to decrease build out.This would include downzoning property or mandating developer fees or when mitigation measures are implemented. Thanks for your questions.As always, email or call if you have any questions. If I ca n't answer them, I'll make sure to get an answer from staff and get back to you. Dan Kalmick, Past Chair Huntington Beach Planning Commission Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org (562) 397-3635 From: Gino J, Bruno [mailto:gbruno@socal.rr.coml Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 11:34 AM To: Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.orp,> Subject: RE:General Plan Update-EIR Thanks, Dan, for your quick response . , If, as a result of the proposed GPU, 7,228 dwelling units could be constructed, 5,384,920 sq. ft. of nonresidential uses could be added, multi-family residential units could increase by 21%, ADT related to schools could be increased by 10%, daily trips could increase by 148,000, ADT could increase by 9%, etc., then . . . . . , how can it be that the EIR emphaficallY concludes (after evaluating the "worst case scenarios" (as you put it)) that" implementation of the General Plan Update WOULD NOT result in adverse impacts on the environment regarding transportation and traffic; thus there are no significant or unavoidable impacts . . . ."? [Emphasis supplied] Secondly, the BECSP was adopted in 2010 (and Bella Terra before that). If those specific plans provided for intersection mitigation measures, when will they be implemented (after all, it's been at least six years)? Item 1.0. - 136 HB -458- Gino From: Kalmick, Dan [mailto:Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org] Sent: Monday,June 12,201711:02 AM To: Gino J. Bruno <gbruno@socal.rr.com> Subject: RE: General Plan Update- EiR Hi Gino, Thanks for your email.This is a large complicated document so any inconsistencies that people find are extremely helpful. I wanted to give you a flew notes so that as you continue to evaluate the EIR you can keep them in mind: CEQA vice a vie the EIR is a legal document trying to check boxes. It has to make projections based on maximum build out of current allowed zoning. Since the only change in land use is some areas going from Industrial to R&T, the population growth In residential is based on areas like Holly Seacliff. Holly Seacliff didn't build out to the maximum densities allowed so in theory it could be all torn down and rebuilt at higher densities and therefore the GP EIR has to account for worst case scenarios. I would point out, that you've replaced word "could"with "will" in your transcription from the EIR to your notes below. With regard to intersections, a lot of the other intersections have mitigations measures in place by specific plans(BECSP and Bella Terra) and therefore are not enumerated. I believe this is discussed in Volt of the Technical backup for the Circulation Element. I don't think these items will be fully addressed at this meeting as we're going to focus on the GP doc itself.The EIR will be looked at during the June 27th study session. Unfortunately Study Sessions aren't televised, so I would hope that you can attend. I will make sure we address all of your questions and we'll evaluate the assumptions made for the data sets. Please feel free to email me or give me a call if you have any additional questions, Dan Kalmick, Past Chair Huntington Beach Planning Commission Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org (562) 397-3635 From: GinoJ. Bruno (mailto:gbruno socal.rr.com] Sent: Monday,June 12,2017 10:43 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>;Wilson, Fred<Fred.Wilson@surfcity-hb.org>; Hess, Scott <scott.hessi?a surfcity-hb.org>;Villasenor,Jennifer<JVillasenor@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: General Plan Update- EIR Commissioners: At your meeting tomorrow (Tuesday) evening, you will be presented with an overview of the draft:General Plan Update, including the EIR, and you will be offering feedback on the topics to be discussed at upcoming study sessions. H B -459- Item 10. - 137 I urge you to consider, as a priority, a study session detailing the Transportation and Traffic section of the EIR (Section 4.14). 1 have commenced my review of the EIR, which includes the following projections and other matters that are important over the next 25 years [bracketed page numbers below reference the EIR]: 1. It is projected that there will be 7,228 more dwelling units added within the city. [p. 4.14-10] 2. It is projected that there will be approximately 5,384,920 square feet of nonresidential uses added. [p. 4.14-10] 3. Multi-family residential units will increase from 40,201 to 48,790, or an increase of 21%. [p. 4.14-11) 4. Average daily traffic (ADT) related to schools will increase by 10%. [p. 4.14-11] 5. The General Plan Update would result in an increase of about 148,000 daily trips. [p. 4.14-11] 6. The EIR concludes that average daily traffic will increase by 9% over the next 25 years. [p. 4.14.10] 7. Only three intersections are recommended for reconfiguration to help alleviate (mitigate) current and future congestion, namely, Gothard & Center, Brookhurst &Adams, and Beach and Heil. [p. 4.14- 12, et seq.] 8. Despite the fact that the last General Plan Update was done in 1996, a conclusion has been reached in the EIR that the average daily traffic has DECREASED in the city since the year 2005 (with no comparison to 1996, nor source cited for any 2005 base-year figure). [p. 4.14-1] 9. The EIR references and relies upon public transportation (OCTA), although press reports indicate that such public transportation ridership is down, and some routes discontinued or re-routed. [p. 4.14-5) 10. "This analysis did NOT identify any effects found NOTto be significant for transportation/traffic resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update." (Emphasis supplied, and which statement I find unintelligible with the double negative. I read it to say, "This analysis DID identify effects found to be significant for transportation/traffic resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update.") [p. 4.14-91 Most troubling to me is the fact that, with all of the projections cited above, along with others, the EIR concludes, regarding Transportation and Traffic: "IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE WOULD NOT RESULT IN ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT REGARDING TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC; THUS, THERE ARE NO SIGNIFICANT OR UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS." [p. 4.14-231 Common sense, logic, personal observations, and bad past Huntington Beach experiences suggest to me that there will be a very significant adverse impact on transportation and traffic from the projected uses described in the General Plan Update that are NOT mitigated by this Report, and thus, I would hope you would ask for much more clarification on traffic in an upcoming Study Session. Thank you. Gino J. Bruno Huntington Beach Item 10. - 138 HB -460- MECHANICAL N4A-CHINfNG COMPANY Precision Machined Parts 15522 COMPUTER LANE, HUNTING TON BEACH, CA 92649 (714) 898-4459 FAX (714) 898-6542 www.fastmfg.com jim@fastmfg.com 7-25-2017 RE: City of HB, General plan update. My opinion of the .new designation RT for industrial land is a good plan/ I forsee no problem with its. implementation. If- a complaint is- raised I would listen, and consider it. I think you should consider adding all industrial lance in HB to the plan. From James Fast, owner of propexty and business at above address, and within the A2*00-1k the proposed area/ , Signed RECEIVED 2017 Ce�=.of CommuMiy Dvdopnnt HB _461- Item 10. - 139 JUSTICIE COMPANY 12140 WOODRUFF AVE, (562) 633-2553 DOWNEY, CA 90241 July 26, 2017 City of Huntington Beach Dept of Community Development Re; General Plan update notification Dear sir: I have received this notice in the mail.. I have no problem with this action. However, l have tried several times to change my mailing address without success. I still own property in the City of Huntington Beach, and the address changes with the utilities was simple. Would you pleasv-change my mailing address in your records t�',T Ralph Justice General Contractors 12140 Woodruff Ave Downey, Ca 90241 Thank you, David Justi e,partner., 562 633 2553 RECEIVED JUL 31 2017 l�ep�,o�C�mr�u�iry Develepmen Item 10. - 140 HB -462- AA i of Huntington Bead. 2000 N4AIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 -�` DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division Code Enforcement Division Building Division 714/536-5271 714/375-5155 714/536-5241 July 14,2017 SUBJECT: City of Huntington Beach General Platt Update Notice Dear Property Owner, The City of Huntington Beach is currently updating the Citywide General Plan, which is a long term policy document that, in part, is used in deciding how land is used and developed in the City, As part of the General Plan Update,the City is proposing to establish a new Research and Technology land use designation along the Gothard. Street corridor and within parts of northwest Huntington Beach on land that is currently designated Industrial. The new Research and Technology (RT) designation is proposed to be similar to the current Industrial land use and zoning designation in that it would continue to allow general industrial uses (such as, but not limited to, manufacturing, warehouse, and wholesale) while expanding the types of uses allowed and providing for more flexible use of space in an effort to retain existing businesses as well as attract new businesses to the area, Should the RT area be approved by the Planning Commission and City Council, there will be additional public outreach and subsequent public hearings (in 2018)to consider the specifics of the RT zoning. As an owner of property within the proposed RT area, this means that businesses that you currently own, operate or lease space to can continue to operate and that there will be more opportunity for business growth in the future. A map of the proposed Research and Technology area is provided on the back of this letter. If you would like more information or have questions on the proposed RT area or the General Plan Update, please contact me directly at 714-374-1661 or via email atjvillasenor@surfeity- hb.org. The General Plan Update is scheduled to be considered by the Planning Coinnussion at a public hearing on August 15, 2017, at 7:00 P.M. in City Council Chambers. The Planning Commission public hearing is to snake a reconunendation to the City Council. The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold a public hearing on the General Plan Update on September 18, 2017. Sincerely, Y4-- 'Jendifer Villasenor Planning Manager N B _46;_. Item 10. - 141 EDMOND M.CONNOR �. MATTHEW J.FLETCHER - RECEIVED O. DOUGLAS A.HEDENKAMP f H -R MICHAEL SAPiRA JAMES M.NAH Dept n1Gorlvnilyievelopmon( DAVID R.RUTAN CONNOR, FLETCHER HEDENKAI4rfP LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW August 3, 2017 VIA E-MAIL AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Ms. Jennifer Villasenor Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 JVillasenor@surfeity-hb.org Re: OVSD's Comments on City's General Plan Update Dear Ms. Villasenor: On July 7, 2417, our office provided you with a letter on behalf of the Ocean View School District("OVSD"), setting forth OVSD's comments on the Draft EIR for the General Plan Update that is currently being processed by the City of Huntington Beach (the "City"). As stated in the California General Plan Guidelines, a General Plan is more than the legal underpinning for land use decisions. Indeed, it should envision how the community will grow, and should reflect community priorities and values in shaping the future. OVSD supports the "Community Vision" set forth in the General Plan Update in that it states that Huntington Beach is a desirable destination for all people to live, work, play, and visit; is a healthy and safe, family-oriented community with flourishing schools and accessible community services for all ages; and has development guided to ensure responsible growth. With that perspective in mind, OVSD respectfully submits the following comments to provide additional information for the City to consider in formulating goals, policies, and implementation measures that will affect OVSD's schools. A. School Sites and Facilities The General Plan Update proposes significant changes from the current General Plan with respect to policies pertaining to property owned by school districts. The current policies are designed to promote a cooperative relationship between the City and school districts, especially with respect to surplus school site reuse and closure. However, that does not appear to be the case with the General Plan Update. Specifically, OVSD is concerned that the General Plan Update seeks to introduce new policies that exceed the City's authority because the Update 2211 MICHELSON DRIVE,SUITE 1100 IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92612 T:949.622.2600 Item 10. - 142 E-MA1L:g-C-Q HB-464-sslit.coni Ms. Jennifer Villasenor August 3, 2017 Page 2 suggests that the City is allowed to (a) exercise control over surplus school sites and facilities and (b) limit OVSD's ability to dispose of its surplus properties in accordance with state taw. We have prepared Table 1 below to summarize the specific goals, policies, and implementation measures set forth in the General Plan Update that seek to change the City's position on how school facilities are used and/or reused in the future: 7ae [ 5mtryoch4ol; t[�tfes£� otc�es ► 31; .:ltnenfatioti1asures�taCP LU-6 Neighborhood school facilities adapt over time to meet the changing education, Goal recreation, and commercial needs of the community, LU-6 A Consider preferred alternatives that maximize public benefit and access to recreation and open s ace for future use of school facilities should a closure occur. LU-6 B Continue to consult with school districts during planning and environmental review of proposed non-education school reuse projects. LU-6 C Consider flexible interim use options to maximize existing use of school spaces while accommodating future community and school needs. LU-P.22 School Building Reuse • To the extent possible emphasize alternative uses that serve public benefit,including other education facilities,community centers, recreation facilities,and open space, although all uses should be considered, • Work to renovate and expand existing school buildings to accommodate new proposed uses,rather than construction of new buildings. • Alternative uses of school property should enable the building to be converted back to school uses at a future date if needed. PSI-5.A Continue to consult with school districts to maximize existing use of school spaces while accommodating future community and school needs. Psi-5.0 Ensure continued use of school facilities for public recreation activities and the use of city parks to support school education purposes PSl P.7 Public Library Facility Plan Evaluate local school libraries servin2 as City library satellites As shown in Table 1 above, the General Plan Update proposes to amend the Land Use Element to include Goal LU-6, Policies LU-6 A through C, and Implementation Measure LU- P.22 to provide that (a) surplus school sites should be limited to other educational facilities, community centers, recreation facilities, and open space; (b) instead of new construction, existing school buildings should be renovated to accommodate new uses and (c) school buildings should be preserved for reuse as schools in the future if needed. The current members of OVSD's school board share the City's desire to retain the playgrounds and recreational facilities currently located on OVSD's school sites in the event that OVSD were ever to decide to close a surplus school site and make it available for sale or lease. However, these same members are mindful of the fact that OVSD and the City are subject to state statutes and regulations that govern the reuse of surplus school sites. As such, it is incumbent on the City to ensure that the General Plan Update is consistent with state law in this regard. I HB -465- Item 10. - 143 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor C � FJIH August 3, 2017 Page 3 As demonstrated by Table 2 below, the Huntington Beach Parks and Recreation Master Plan has designated seven (7) OVSD schools sites, consisting of a total of 16.98 acres, as potential parks for the City to purchase if any of the sites were ever deemed to be surplus school sites that would have to go through the Naylor Act process: ---- fl_ E YksXar a eailfor�1�11ast r P[t r . Circle View Park 2.31 Neighborhood Park Glen View Park 3,02 Neighborhood Park Haven View Park 2.95 Nei hborhood Park Lake View Park 2.16 Neighborhood Park Marine View Park 2.96 Neighborhood Park Pleasant View Park 2.17 Neighborhood Park Robinwood Park 1.41 Neighborhood Park Total 16.98 Identifying sites and acreage would be the first step in preparing the way for the City to possibly purchase portions of these school sites for parks, if and when the sites were ever deemed surplus and.put up for sale. However, in proposing to adopt Goal LU-6, Policies LU-6 A-C and Implementation Measure LU-P.22, the City is seeking to create land use restrictions that the City may later try to use to justify (a) limiting surplus school sites to only park or recreational uses in the future and (b) interfering with OVSD's right to sell its property. These policies would not be consistent with state law and would directly conflict with the authority OVSD has over its own property. Notably, any such restrictions would be preempted by state statutes and regulations that specify the procedures that school districts must follow with respect to surplus school closure and reuse. For example, in the past, cities had a first right to purchase, at fair market value and under certain conditions, school district land used for playgrounds and recreation. That has now changed to give the first right of purchase to charter schools. OVSD is compelled to follow state law concerning surplus school site procedures, if and when the situation ever occurs. In this regard, Section 65852.9 of the Government Code, which was enacted by the California Legislature in 2006, provides, in relevant part, that cities may not rezone surplus school sites to open-space, park, or recreational uses unless adjacent properties are so zoned or unless the school district in question agrees to such rezoning. In addition, section 65852.9 provides that, if certain conditions are met with respect to a given surplus school site, a school district may request that the site be zoned to be "consistent with the provisions of the applicable general and specific plans and compatible with the uses of the property surrounding the school site." In order to comply with the legislative intent embodied in section 65852.9, the General Plan Update needs to be revised. To this end, OVSD proposes that the goals, policies, and implementation measures listed in Table 1 above be revised to read as follows: Item 10. - 144 HB -466- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor I August 3, 2017 Page 4 T� 11 ,1 pxa�nsed l�evtsed TxltQrGi�ool, aifttre fobi PQftcies end fm lJi�pptatron . . :. . .:m..:::. LU-6 Neighborhood school sites adapt over time to meet the changing needs of the Goal community, LU-6 A Consistent with state law, explore alternatives with school districts for public benefit and access to recreation and open space as well as other uses for surplus school sites should a closure occur. LU-6 B Continue to consult with school districts in connection with any City-related or school district-related planning and environmental review of proposed non-education surplus school-site-projects. LU-6 C In consultation with school districts,and consistent with state law, encourage flexible interim use options to maximize existing use of school sites while addressing future community needs. LU-P.22 School Building Reuse: Consistent with state law, explore alternative uses with school districts that serve public benefit, including other education facilities,community centers, recreation facilities, and open space,although all uses should be considered. PSI.5,A Continue to consult with school districts to maximize existing use of school sites while addressing future community and school district needs. PS1-5.0 Continue to work with school districts for shared use of school district park spaces for public recreational activities and the use of city parks to support school education purposes. PSI-P.7 Public Library Facility Plan Explore with local school districts the use of school libraries serving as city library satellites. In addition to making the changes reflected in Table 3 above, the land use designations for four school sites need to be changed to make them consistent with the land use designations for the properties surrounding those sites. Figure LU-2, "Land Use Plan," in the General Plan Update indicates that all OVSD school sites are designated as "Low Density Residential." However, properties adjacent to the Park View, Oak View, Sun View, and Harbour View elementary schools are designated as "Medium Density Residential." Accordingly, Figure LU-2 should be revised to redesignate those four schools as "Medium Density Residential." In addition to the above, OVSD is also concerned that Implementation Measure PSI-P.7 calls for the City to evaluate the use of existing school libraries for City library satellites. OVSD has never been consulted about the use of school libraries for city library use and there are a myriad of concerns that OVSD would have about such a program. Accordingly, OVSD requests that PSI-P.7 be changed to read as follows: Public Library Facility Plan Explore with local school districts the use of school libraries serving as city library satellites HB -467- Item 10. - 145 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor August 3, 2017 Page 5 B. Intensification of Commercial and Industrial Land Use The General Plan Update proposes to add over 13,000,000 square feet of non- residential development. A majority of this consists or industrial development in the Northwest Industrial and Gothard Subareas. OVSD has suffered in the past from the City's failure to exercise its land use authority to address the incompatibility issues that obviously exist between industrial and sensitive land uses in the Gothard Industrial Corridor Subarea. The General Plan Update provides a perfect opportunity for the City to meaningfully address these issues and incorporate policies to reduce such land use conflicts. In our July 7th letter regarding the Draft FIR, OVSD proposed a number of mitigation measures and asked the City to include additional policies and implementation measures in the General Plan Update in order to lessen the environmental impacts associated with the development contemplated by the Update. For example, OVSD has requested that the General Plan Update be revised to include development standards that limit Floor Area Ratio, increase building setbacks, increase landscape buffers, and confine noise and odor-generating operations to fully enclosed buildings near sensitive land uses, such as public schools. There are well-documented land use compatibility issues involving industrial uses and sensitive land uses. These issues will only be exacerbated with intensification of industrial land uses associated with the General Plan Update unless land use controls and development standards are included. OVSD respectfully requests that the City incorporate the following land use controls and development standards in the General Plan Update to address the land use compatibility issues that are of great concern to OVSD_ 1. Prohibit uses that potentially generate diesel emissions, TAC emitters, dust and odors generators within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive uses. 2. Require increased building setbacks (currently zero to 10 feet), as well as increased landscape requirements (currently 8%)for industrial and commercial uses in the Gothard Subarea. 3. Require conditional use permits (that would include air quality analyses and noise studies to be performed) for all industrial and commercial uses in the Gothard Subarea and Northwest Industrial Subarea within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive uses. 4. Require uses in the new Research and Technology classification to be "green and clean," instead of only"encouraging such conditions" as stated in Goal LU-5.6. 5. Require project applicants to submit land use plans that include heightened consideration of policies and strategies to minimize exposure of sensitive receptors and sites (e.g., schools, hospitals, and residences) to health risks related to air pollution. 6. Require development to be scaled to complement adjoining uses with respect to building setbacks, building height, and landscape screening. Item 10. - 146 HB -468- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor August 3, 2017 Page 6 7. Actively enforce the City's Noise Ordinance both stationary noise and roadway noise to lessen the ambient community noise levels. B. Require the lower standard to be used when adjacent land uses have different noise standards to ensure that the noise levels at the property line are not exceeded for sensitive land uses. C. Environmental Justice The General Plan Update does not adequately address the subject of environmental justice, i.e., the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. A healthy environment should be available to everyone, and the burdens of pollution should not be focused on sensitive populations or on communities that already are experiencing the adverse effects of pollution. The General Plan Update needs to be revised to set forth goals, policies and implementation measures to provide equal treatment concerning the pollution burden generated by land use and access to public benefits, such as parks and sidewalks. Figure ERC-2 in the General Plan Update indicates a lack of neighborhood parks near the Oak View neighborhood, but there are no goals or policies provided to increase the number of parks in this area, which has the highest density population in the City and has been identified by Cal EPA as a community that has serious environmental justice issues confronting it. The General Plan Update is proposing to intensify industrial uses adjacent to the Oak View community. As such, the Update should evaluate this in light of the environmental burden that already exists for this community and the Oak View Elementary School and Preschool that serve the community. Chapter 8—Public Participation of the California General Plan Guidelines, provides that public participation is an important part of environmental justice in order to have planners, decision-makers and the community engage in meaningful dialogue about future development. The City needs to provide the Oak View neighborhood with the opportunity to participate in the General Plan Update process by providing alternative communication services, such as translators and public notices in Spanish about the General Plan Update. OVSD is quite concerned that the Oak View community cannot engage in meaningful dialogue with the City regarding the intensification of industrial uses and its impact to the community if there has been no targeted outreach to the Oak View residents. D. Proposed Additional Goals. Policies, and Implementation Measures OVSD's July 7th comment letter on the Draft EIR included several requests for the City to include additional policies and implementation measures in the General Plan Update to ensure that the assumptions made will be implemented by the development associated with and facilitated by the General Plan Update. OVSD requests that the following policies and implementation measures be added to the General Plan Update to ensure development assumptions will, in fact, be achieved: HB -469- Item 10. - 147 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor I FIH August 3, 2017 Page 7 • The Project Description in the Draft EIR states the project consists of 7,228 residential units and 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential development, but the Transportation/Traffic section states there is 8,589 multifamily units and 13,099,000 square feet of non-residential. A land use cap on the type and amount residential units and non-residential square footage needs to be incorporated into the General Plan Update. • The General Plan Update needs to clarify the location of the assumed 7,228 residential units. The Draft EIR it anticipates that more units would be added to the Beach/Edinger Corridor Specific Plan, but does not provide a number. The Project Description should include a description of the amount of units that will be added above the current cap of 2,100 in order for OVSD to plan for the anticipated school children that will be generated by the General Plan Update. • Staff has stated that the majority of the anticipated residential development will occur in the Downtown area and the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area. However, there are no policies or implementation measures to limit where residential development will occur. The General Plan Update should either indicate where the assumed residential development could occur or incorporate policies that align with the project assumptions. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the General Plan Update. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me or the below- listed representatives of OVSD. V y ulyyours, A nond M. Connor cc_ Gina Clayton-Tarvin, President, OVSD Board of Trustees Carol Hansen, Superintendent, OVSD Michael Conroy, Asst. Superintendent, OVSD Susan Whittaker, Whittaker Planning Services Item 10. - 148 HB -470- THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE ALSO INCLUDED IN THE FINAL EIR AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS H B -471- Item 10. - 149 From: Ted Ross To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject EIR Comments Date: Wednesday,June 07,2017 2:49:43 PM Sorry but there wasn't an indication that the web page for collecting comments was working properly??? tedross-0077(@ msn.com Comments to Draft EIR: 1) Several references are made as to source data provided by Michael Baker International,. but no qualifying explanation is provided. Since this must be some sort of private consulting firm what are their qualifications to provide such data. Why haven't appropriate Government agencies specifically chartered to provide source data been used as references? Furthermore, what pedigree does Michael Baker International, have in using their data in the past as compared to actual achieved results? 2) Paragraph 2.6.1: "..............lower level of growth that is reasonably forecast based on the Huntington Beach Traffic Model, which was updated for the 2013 Circulation Element Update, and accounting for existing conditions within the city of Huntington Beach and the goals and policies of the existing General Plan (1996)" . Comment: Since it is quite obvious to those who travel Huntington Beach Streets this statement needs lots of work; starting with a new Huntington Beach Traffic Model that takes in to account the obvious impact of the new high density housing traffic increases that seem to have caught everyone off guard?, 3) Transportation/Traffic: "General Plan Update Goal CIRC-1:The circulation system supports existing, approved, and planned land uses while maintaining a desired level of service and capacity on streets and at critical intersections.". Comment: It isn't happening now so what makes you think it will be alright in the future? You can't keep up with the needs for infrastructure maintenance with robbing peter to pay Paul so how will this be accomplished in the future. Fiscal trends for both city and State would seem to argue for the contrary. What new resources will be made available that don't exist now? 4) "ERC-15.C: Evaluate participation in Orange County Water District's recycled water program, and explore opportunities for the city to produce its own recycled water for use within the community." Comment: This is very important; very effort should be made to fully participate in Orange County Water District's recycled water program to the maximum extent possible. 5) "ERC-13.F: Support Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) feasibility studies" Comment: Seriously object to this statement, neither the City Council nor the residents/electorate has authorized such an effort. The City has no role to play in providing and ensuring public utilities. This is presumptuous and needs to be stricken from the EIR and considerations in Item 10. - 150 1413 -472- the General Plan Update unless the Electorate has authorized this new concept for Public Utilities. Ted Ross 8111 Falmouth Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 HB -473- Item 10. - 151 From: Ted Ross To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject: RE:Draft GP&EIR Comments Date: Monday,June 12,2017 4:15,41 PM Jennifer, In this email I'll try to recall my comments made at the last meeting you hosted and were provided verbally at first; then I'll be going back to complete my review now that I understand the organization of the documents to be reviewed better, Volume 1 Draft General Plan: 1. Page 1-2 "Key Facts" inserted data. Comment on the source; "4) Stanley R. Hoffman Associates" was included without qualifications to provide such data. You would be far better served by using know qualified sources for reference data such as State and Federal entities that specialize in providing such data. 2. Page 1-4 Paragraph on "Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy" & sentence : "The RTP was adopted in 2017 and is 3. updated every four years to address regional transportation needs. The General Plan must be consistent with these regional planning efforts." Comment: Since Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is not an elected entity perhaps you need to state how the RTP is actually authorized and how The Huntington Beach General Plan must be consistent with it? I do not believe the electorate has ever been asked to concur with this arrangement? 4. Page 2-24. "Table LU-1 General Plan Distribution of Land Uses". Comment: Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 5. Page 2-25. "Table LU-2 General Plan Development Capacity". Comment: Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 6. Page 3-19. "Figure CIRC-4" Comment: How is the data shown in Figure CIRC-4 subject to change by OCTA updated? Perhaps this should be time dependent in some reference so updates can be easily made to reflect the latest OCTA plans& implementation of Bus routes? 7. Page 4-15. "Figure CIRC-4". Comment: Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 8. Page 4-22. "Table ERC-6 Current and Forecasted Energy Use". Comment: For the data set 2005 & 2012 Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 9. Page 4-38. "Paragraph dealing with "Goal ERC-13. Increase both distributed generation and utility renewable energy sources within municipal and community-wide practices. Sub-item F) "Support Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) feasibility studies." Comment: Seriously object to this statement, neither the City Council nor the residents/electorate has authorized such an effort. The City has no role to play in providing and ensuring public utilities. This is presumptuous and needs to be stricken from the EIR and considerations in the General Plan Update unless the Electorate has authorized this new concept for Public Utilities. As stated in the GP it appears that City staff has assumed that this is a suitable objective and that it should be favored. Thisjust isn't the case and places the City in a potential high risk position for assuming utilities rate control and providing for common consumption in times of economic peril! 10. Page 8-6. "LU-P.10. Affordable Housing Ensure that Huntington Beach has a sufficient supply of housing for individuals and families of all incomes, including extremely low- and very low-income residents. Meet or exceed the target number of affordable units specified in the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation." Comment: I thought this was settled by Mike Gates, City Attorney, that the City of Huntington Beach is not Item 10. - 152 HB -474- subject to the implied reference to the Keimedy Commission; "target number of affordable units specified in the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation. 11. Page 8-32. "ERC-P.13. Community Choice Aggregation". Comment: Seriously object to this statement,neither the City Council nor the residents/electorate has authorized such an effort. The City has no role to play in providing and ensuring public utilities. This is presumptuous and needs to be stricken from the EIR and considerations in the General Plan Update unless the Electorate has authorized this new concept for Public Utilities. As stated in the GP it appears that City staff has assumed that this is a suitable objective and that it should be favored. This just isn't the case and places the City in a potential high risk position for assuming utilities rate control and providing for common consumption in times of economic peril? (repeat!). Comments to Draft EIR Volume 2: (Continued from prior email dated 6/7/2017) 1. Page 2-34. "MM4.10-5 Prior to issuance of construction permits, applicants for new development projects within 500 feet of noise-sensitive receptors will implement the following best management practices to reduce construction noise levels", Comment: This is the item I spoke to during the last public review where I pointed the potential damage to infrastructure roads from construction noise generated by hauling trucks inducing long -term cumulative structural fatigue to roadways by low frequency sound caused by trucks during the hauling process. This can be mitigated by in part the use of specifications requiring trucks be equipped with Air-ride suspension systems. 2. Where items flagged in my General Plan comments have corresponding items within the EIR Volume 2 these comment have direct applicability to those items also. Ted Ross 8111 Falmouth Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Villasenor, Jennifer Sent: Monday,June 12, 2017 11:26 AM To:Ted Ross Subject: Re: EIR Comments Hi Ted, 1113 -475- Item 10. - 153 Thank you for your comments on the EIR. They will be responded to in writing in the final EIR. Also, we had the website fixed. However, if you have further comments, please send there directly to me. Thank you. Jennifer Sent from my iPad On Jun 7, 2017, at 2:49 PM, Ted Ross<tedross_0077(@msn.com>wrote: Sorry but there wasn't an indication that the web page for collecting comments was working properly??? tedross 0077(@msn,com Comments to Draft EIR: 1) Several references are made as to source data provided by Michael Baker International,. but no qualifying explanation is provided. Since this must be some sort of private consulting firm what are their qualifications to provide such data. Why haven't appropriate Government agencies specifically chartered to provide source data been used as references? Furthermore, what pedigree does Michael Baker International, have in using their data in the past as compared to actual achieved results? 2) Paragraph 2.6.1: °..............lower level of growth that is reasonably forecast based on the Huntington Beach Traffic Model, which was updated for the 2013 Circulation Element Update, and accounting for existing conditions within the city of Huntington Beach and the goals and policies of the existing General Plan (1996)" . Comment: Since it is quite obvious to those who travel Huntington Beach Streets this statement needs lots of work; starting with a new Huntington Beach Traffic Model that takes in to account the obvious impact of the new high density housing traffic increases that seem to have caught everyone off guard!. 3) Transportation/Traffic: "General Plan Update Goal CIRC-1: The circulation system supports existing, approved, Item 10. - 154 HB -476- and planned land uses while maintaining a desired level of service and capacity on streets and at critical intersections.". Comment: It isn't happening now so what makes you think it will be alright in the future? You can't keep up with the needs for infrastructure maintenance with robbing peter to pay Paul so how will this be accomplished in the future. Fiscal trends for both city and State would seem to argue for the contrary. What new resources will be made available that don't exist now? 4) "ERC-15.C: Evaluate participation in Orange County Water District's recycled water program, and explore opportunities for the city to produce its own recycled water for use within the community." Comment: This is very important; very effort should be made to fully participate in Orange County Water District's recycled water program to the maximum extent possible. 5) "ERC-13.F:Support Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) feasibility studies" Comment: Seriously object to this statement, neither the City Council nor the residents/electorate has authorized such an effort. The City has no role to play in providing and ensuring public utilities. This is presumptuous and needs to be stricken from the EIR and considerations in the General Plan Update unless the Electorate has authorized this new concept for Public Utilities. Ted Ross 8111 Falmouth Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 HB -477- Item 10. - 155 From: Gino J. Bruno To: Viliasenor,Jennifer Cc: Hess.Scott;Wilson,Fred Subject: Comments to General Plan Update EIR Date: Monday,June 12,2017 11:09:11 AM Ms. Villasenor, regarding the EIR ancillary to the General Plan Update (GPU), and particularly Section 4.14 ("Transportation/Traffic"): As I understand it, the city's current General Plan was last comprehensively updated in 1996. [Agenda for the Planning Commission meeting of June 13, 2017] At page 4.14-5, the EIR describes the "Performance Criteria" that was used, and how the Average Daily Traffic [ADT] volumes date back to the 1996 General Plan. At page 4.14-1, the EIR states: "The existing ADT volumes are from a comprehensive count program conducted in the spring of 2014, and supplemented by traffic counts conducted in 2012, 2013, and 2016. A comparison of observed planning area-wide traffic count data was performed for the years 2005 and 2014. The results indicate that, on average, daily vehicle trip levels throughout the planning area decreased by approximately one percent in that time period." And so, 2005 was compared with 2014, and a conclusion was reached that there was a decrease in average daily traffic. Questions: 1. Why was the year 2005 used in this comparison, rather than the year 1996 when the General Plan was last updated? 2. Where in the EIR (if at all) is the actual "comparison of observed planning area-wide traffic count data [that] was performed for the years 2005 and 2014" so that one may verify that the comparison was indeed between "apples and apples"? Section 4.14.3.2 reads in full: "This analysis did NOT identify any effects found NOT to be significant for transportation/traffic resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update." [Emphasis supplied] With the double negatives, I read this as saying, "This analysis DID identify effects found to be significant . . . ." Question: If the analysis DID identify effects found to be significant, does the EIR reflect how those "significant" effects would be mitigated (in addition to the reconfiguration of the three intersections of Gothard & Center, Brookhurst & Adams, and Beach & Heil)? If so, please indicate where. Thank you Item 10. - 156 HB -478- Gino J. Bruno Huntington Beach HB _479_ Item 10. - 157 1.1 i7 �l1JJ- iLvltl v. A Av RECEIVED Serving., ��i"�.!l C C OLII� y 't":1111?'r":3 r`/01") J0 j:�i - l cl. :t Anaheim 10844 Ellis Avenue,Fountain Valley,CA 92708 71-4.962.2411�P+1j,�Rt�Y V. l bl elfl�meh Brea. Buena Park June 13, 2017 Cypress Fountain Valley Jennifer Villasenor .Fullerton Planning Manager, City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Garden.Grove 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Irvine SUBJECT: Draft EIR for the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update La Habra La Palma Orange County Sanitation District (Sanitation District) has reviewed your Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the Huntington Beach General L.osAlarjitos Plan Update. Newport Beach The Sanitation District is requesting that the City of Huntington Beach model the Orange Regional Collection System while modelling for the local sewer impacts as Placentia physical developments are planned. Please use the following flow factors to estimate current and future flows for projects: Santa Ana • 727 gpd/acre for estate density residential (0-3 d.u. /acre) .Seal Beach • 1488 gpolacre for low density residential (4-7d.u. /acre) • 3451 gpolacre for medium density residential (8-16 d.u./acre) Stanton 5474 gpolacre for medium-high density residential (17-25 d,u./acre) Tustin • 7516 gpolacre for high density residential (26-35 d.u./acre) • 2262 gpolacre for commercial/office Vida Park • 3167 gpolacre for industrial Couity of Orange ° 2715 gpd/acre for institutional • 5429 gpolacre for high intensity industrial/commercial Costa Mesa 150 gpd/room for hotels and motels Sanitary District Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed General Midway Ciry Plan Update through 2040. If you have questions, or for more information, San.nary District please contact me at (714) 593-7331. Irvine Ranch Water District 71 P Yorba Linda Ann Crafton Water.District.. Principal Financial Analyst Planning Division oJ»ty S0.NlTq TiQH o AC:sa 9 http:/lprojecUsites/Planning/CEQA/Externally Generated/2017 Comment Letters/20170609 City of Huntington a Beach Draft EIR-General Plan Update.docx orFcl�rQ t1IE EyJQ�<,b Our Mission: To protect public health and the environment by Item 10. - 158 HB providing effecf ^ -^_4 �_^80-ter collection, treatment, and recycling. Aff PublicWorks Integrity, Accountability, Service, Trust = Shane L. Silsby, Director June 14, 2017 NCL-2015-025 Jerunifer Villasenor, Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Notice of Availability of a Draft Program EIR for the Huntington Beach General Plan Update Dear Ms. Villasenor: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Availability of a Draft Program EIR for the Huntington Beach General Plan Update. The County of Orange Flood Program Support/Hydrology Section reviewed the document and offers the following comments for your consideration: 1. It is the goal of the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) to provide 100- year flood protection. To provide for this goal, OCFCD attempts to design facilities to convey 100-year flows where feasible. Many of OCFCD's facilities are a mixture of segments built at different times. Improvements of deficient OCFCD facilities are programmed through the OCFCD's Seven-Year Flood Control Projects Plan. OCFCD's Seven-Year Flood Control Projects Plan is reviewed annually and revised based upon Countywide prioritization; it is possible that the design and construction of channel improvements might be postponed or delayed and not constructed for many years. Hence, mitigation of any adverse impacts resulting from the project should not rely solely on a potential OCFCD improvement project. 2. The Project Area is tributary to the Orange County Flood Control District's (OCFCD) facilities. A map/exhibit should identify and indicate these regional flood control facilities that will likely be impacted by the proposed project. Drainage Facility Base maps that depict existing local and regional drainage facilities owned by the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) are available for review at littf)://www.ocflood.com/docs/di-awinks 3. All work within or adjacent to any OCFCD right-of-way for flood control facilities should be conducted so as not to adversely impact channel's structural integrity, hydraulic flow conditions, access and maintainability. Furthermore, all work within 300 N. Flower Street,Santa Ana, CA 92703 www.ocpublieworks.com P.O.Box 4048,Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 714.667,8800 1 Info@OCPW.ocgov,com HB -481- Item 10. - 1.59 OCFCD's right-of-way should be conducted only after an encroachment pen-nit for the proposed work has been obtained from the County, For information regarding the pen-nit application process and other details please refer to the Encroachment Pennits Section link on OC Public Works' website llti_L):/hvww.ocpublicworks.coin/ds/permits/eiieroaclinient permits s Technical reviews and approvals for the proposed work will be accomplished within the permit process. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Sahar Parsi at (714) 647-3988 or Robert McLean at (714) 647-3951 in Flood Programs, or Linda Smith at (714) 667-8848 in Development Services. Sincerely, Laree Alonso, Manager, Planning Division OC Public Works Service Area/OC Development Services 300 North Flower Street Santa Ana, California 92702-4048 Laree.alonso@ocpw.ocgov.corn cc, Sahar Parsi, OC Flood Programs Robert McLean, OC Flood Programs 300 N.Plower Street, Santa Ana,CA 92703 www,ocpublicworks.com P.O.Box 4048, Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 714.667.8800 1 lnfo@OCPW,ocgov.com Item 10. - 160 HB -482- From: Mike Ferguson To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject: Comment on the GPU and EIR updates: Delaware Street residential traffic impact Date: Thursday,June 22,2017 6:45:55 AM Per http://\vA�,\v.liuntir�(toiibeachca.govZgovernment/del2ai-tments/Manning/major/general-plan- update,chn, this will comment on the GPU and EIR updates. I live on Delaware Street between Memphis and Indianapolis. I have long suffered reduced quality-of-life and property value due to increased traffic supporting increased downtown business activity and residential density. I have long argued against this uncompensated taking, i.e., absent judicial review through condemnation proceedings. This argument has lately assumed the form of criticizing a Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program (BCIP) funding proposal, which I apprehend is a thinly veiled civic enterprise design that would further abuse Delaware Street residents and property owners by an uncompensated taking. That is, quality-of-life and residential property value on Delaware Street would be further sacrificed and degraded for the benefit of downtown business interests, if not civic enterprise, absent just compensation. While I would favor re-directing noisy Delaware through-traffic to commercial arterial streets, e.g., Beach Boulevard, I doubt that promoting Delaware as a bicycle boulevard will achieve that end. I suspect it more likely that funding is sought to perfect the City's claim to a wider street width, ostensibly to pave sidewalks, e.g.,using a cynical, alannist interpretation of the ADA. This I apprehend as little more than a ruse to eventually re-purpose Delaware as a secondary arterial, its former designation in the MPAH, despite the absence of traffic noise mitigation in the residential neighborhood. This seems to me planning absent constitutionally required consideration for residents, confirming my view that this design is an unlawful taking. I am pleased that OCTA no longer routes large, noisy, underutilized buses past my Delaware residence. But 1 suspect that change resulted more from the Orange County bankruptcy than residents' complaints. Either way,that change made residential use more tolerable. I have not examined plan updates in detail, because I suppose that economic development is preferable to decline. I also suspect it inevitable that economic pressure will ultimately prevail, and Delaware residential property value will continue to be sacrificed to downtown trade. But I did note that it appears Delaware has been downgraded from secondary arterial to collector, a welcome change reflecting reality, since Delaware fails to meet requirements for use as a secondary arterial. If a bicycle corridor would improve my residential property value, I might support that use if it involved no perfecting of a wider street width. The existing width seems adequate to stripe for bicycle lanes, and sidewalks will (eventually) be installed as a condition of new construction. A resort to condemnation would confirm my suspicion that Delaware is aggressively planned for through-traffic, that I consider an abuse of the residential zoning. In 1905, when the Vista del Mar subdivision was recorded, the platted width of Delaware Street was arguably designed to support a commercial thoroughfare. But my understanding is that the City has persistently directed development otherwise, failed to timely perfect a wider width, and Delaware property owners have arguably paid the price. Now, a century later, not only are Delaware property owners denied commercial use on a street with traffic that impairs residential value, their property value is expropriated to support downtown development by bearing a through-traffic burden absent corresponding benefit. I would argue that is an abuse 1-113 -483- Item 10. - 161 of the subdivision neap, that allocated the street less for public use than more direct benefit to subdivision property owners, i.e.,not to support downtown profiteering absent compensation. In the 1905 horse-and-buggy era, when sidewalk paving for pedestrian use was a higher priority than paving between curbs, 1 doubt that the subdivision map intended to invite the noise, nuisance, and hazard of modern motor vehicle through-traffic. Since I am unfamiliar with the plan details, I would value counter-argument to my impression that the plan might demonstrate. I have seen some signs of an ambivalent drift toward down- zoning Oldtown to more upscale residential use, e.g., McMansions. That residential value is impaired by through-traffic. As I note the coastal changes over some time, it seems undeniable that density has increased, density increases will continue, traffic must necessarily increase to support that increasing density, and Delaware Street residential value will remain under threat of sacrifice to support increased coastal development density. The best planning might manage is to balance economic development against preserving, if not promoting, the quality-of-life necessary to retain, if not attract, residents to support it. Item 10. - 162 HB -484- CITY OF FOUN,rAfN VALLEY PLANNING DEPARTMENT /,zmorLArcxA/sxcE ' ro'v//xo/ FAua rx /r/� 593'452/ June 26, 2D17 �/ YkN . ~° �i� ]enn�erVU|aseno� Man ager 'U , ^ww/mm�Denlopeol City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2ODD Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: NOAof Draft Program E|R for Huntington Beach General Plan Update (E\KNo. 14-OD1)(StateC|aringhouseNo. 2015101032) Dear Ms. VU|asennr: Thank you for the opportunityto comment on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report(EIR) for the Huntington Beach General Plan Update. Our understanding is that the Draft Program E|R for the General Plan Update will identify and analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with a city initiated comprehensive update to the General Plan for an approximate 25-year planning horizon to 2040. Following our review of the Draft Program E|R for the Huntington Beach General Plan Update, we have the fo||ovvinQcononoents/cnncerns: 1. The City ofFountain Valley is concerned with the impacts on Fountain Valley roadways throughout the City due to the addition of 105,000 daily trips. There is already considerable traffic generated from Huntington Beach that travels Fountain Valley streets to access the 1-405 and other cities and areas east of Fountain Valley. A comprehensive traffic analysis of all Fountain Valley aMLer(a|s and intersections needs to be conducted to evaluate the potential impacts. In addition, evaluation of Garfield/Gisler bridge construction should be considered to address traffic impacts generated from the proposed project as well as to address existing traffic impacts due to a lack of balanced, regional traffic network. 2. Truck traffic, especially on Talbert Avenue, needs to be evaluated to address impacts of additional truck traffic that will be generated by the proposed traffic as well as addressing existing impacts of truck traffic uD Talbert Avenue and abutting land uses that originates in Huntington Beach accessing 1'405 in Fountain Valley. Once again, thank you for the opportunity to review the Draft Program E|R for the Huntington Beach General Plan Update. Should you have any questions about our comments, please don't hesitate to me at (714) 593-4431or email at . S| | Steven' Ayers T�vnl0 1 �� BD� -48�- "^�^^^ ^"' - ^"� Planner Kathleen Treseder 61 Murasaki St, Irvine CA 92617 619-459-9493 treseder@stanfordalun-uli.org July 3, 2017 Ms. Villasenor City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, CA 92648 jillasenor@surfcity-hb.org Dear Ms. Villasenor, I am Professor and Chair of the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at UC Irvine. I have researched and taught climate change science for 22 years. I am writing to express my strongest possible support for the Huntington Beach General Plan item ERG P.13: a feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation(CCA) plan. If Huntington Beach adopts CCA, the community will likely choose sustainable energy like solar, wind, and geothermal power. Currently, CCA is cheaper than conventional energy plans. Moreover,free market competition and advances in sustainable energy technology will probably cut CCA prices even further. Sustainable energy use will help Huntington Beach meet state-rnandated reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to future climate change. Based on current rates of climate change, sea level rise will cause 2-foot floods in Huntington Beach by 2030 (see attaclunent). In fact,we predict this with 100% certainty. Within Huntington Beach, a fair amount of coastal land lies below 2 feet, and is at risk for flooding. Specifically, 130 people live in 67 homes with a total property value of$120 million. lloivever, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions can slow the rate of sea level rise and protect tlus coastland. Altogether, CCA is a cost-effective way for Hun.tirigton Beach to avoid future property damage from sea level rise. I strongly endorse this approach, and I appreciate that the city is considering it. Sincerely, Kathleen Treseder Item 10. - 164 HB -486- Selected water level; 2 feet. May occur from sea level rise, coastal flooding, or both. What's at risk on land below 2 feet?"' • Population:130 • Homes: 67 • Property value: $120 Million 2 feet in historical context 3A • Highest observed area flood: 2.4 feet in 2005 • Statistical 1-in-100 year flood height: 2.3 feet • Most recent flood over 2 feet observed in: not in record Unnatural Coastal Floods' About two-thirds of U.S. coastal flood days since 1950 would not have met the National Weather Service's local definition of flooding without the few inches so far of human -caused, climate -driven sea level rise. Rising seas = more floods' • Huntington Beach, CA has already experienced about 3 inches of sea level rise over the last 90 years of records. Climate change is projected to drive much more rise this century. • This raises the starting point for storm surges and high tides, making coastal floods more severe and more frequent. 1A6 When could a 2-foot flood happen? • Likelihood by 2030: 100%-100% • Likelihood by 2050: 100%-100% • Likelihood by 2100: 100%-100% Land and population below 2 feet in Huntington Beach, CA Social vulnerability (e.g. from low income) compounds coastal risk. Land below 2 feet is colored according to the legend. Surging Seas uses high -accuracy lidar elevation data supplied by NOAA. Map reflects a uniform sea level andlorflood height. Individual storm surge, tidal or rainfall events cause more complex and uneven water surfaces. 1 Floods and sea level rise are relative to local high tide lines circa 1992 (mean higher high water across 1983-2001). 2 Values exclude sub-2-ftareas potentially protected by levees, natural ridges, and other features. Surging Seas 3 Climate Central estimates risk by combining local sea level rise projections with flood height risk statistics based on historic data. 4 Flood risk projections and history are based on records from the NOAA water level station at Los Angeles - Outer Harbor,15 miles Sea Laval Rise Tools & Analysis by from Huntington Beach, from 1923 to 2013. 5 Strauss, B. H., Kopp, R. E., Sweet, W. V. and Bittermann, K., 2016. Unnatural Coastal Floods. Climate Central Research Report. CLIMATE O:)CENTRAL 6 Sea level projections are localized, and local flood risks projected, based on methods from Tebaldi et al. 2012 (Environmental Research Letters). HB -487- Item 110. - 165 For more methods, limitations, (ulf citations, seesource: rlskfinderorg ,ndowt Coastal Risks for Huntington Beach, CA, Climate Central, 712120,1 What causes sea level to rise? • A warming ocean: Thermometer and satellite measurements show that the ocean has been warming for more than a century. Water expands as it warms, and the only way the ocean can go is up and out. • Shrinking ice: Warmer air and water temperatures are causing global glaciers and ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica to melt or to break off into the ocean. Adding water or ice from land to the ocean raises sea level, and is by far the biggest future threat. • Sinking land: In some places, coastal land is sinking, due to a variety of slow, long-term processes not linked to current climate change, or due to pump extraction of water or fossil fuels from underground formations. What causes climate change? • The main activity causing climate change is the burning of fossil fuels, which emits heat -trapping pollution. • Leading scientific bodies agree: Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research concludes that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primarydriver.' Can sea level rise be slowed? • Major cuts in heat -trapping pollution through measures such as a swift global transition to a clean energy economy, climate -friendly agriculture, and protecting forests would reduce future sea level rise. REDUCING YOUR RISK Preparing yourself and your community Does sea level rise affect flooding? • Sea level rise raises the starting point for waves, tides, and storm surge, making coastal floods more severe and more frequent. • A February 2016 Climate Central analysis found that about two-thirds of U.S. coastal flood days since 1950 would not have met the National Weather Service's local definition of flooding without the few inches so far of human -caused, climate -driven global sea level rise. What does the future hold? • Some future sea level rise is inevitable due to pollution already in the atmosphere, forcing some adaptation. • Rapid cuts in emissions of heat -trapping pollution would increase the chances of limiting global sea level rise to near 2 feet this century, but continuing unchecked pollution could lead to a rise of more than 6 feete • A 2-foot rise would mean widespread, dramatic increases in flooding, and submergence of the very lowest coastal places. A 6-foot rise would pose severe and in cases existential threats to major coastal cities worldwide. • Many places will be able to reduce sea level rise impacts by establishing defenses, accommodating floods, or relocating some development, at uncertain cost. • Pollution this century will lock in sea level rise for hundreds of years to come — likely far more than 6 feet on the current path. The final amount will depend on how rapidly the world community can reduce and then stop heat -trapping pollution. • Actions to curb heat -trapping pollution will reduce sea level rise, but some rise Is unavoidable. • Learn more about the actions you can take yourself at sealevel.climatecentral.org/flood-preparation • Make sure leaders in your community know your area's risks by sharing this fact sheet and riskfinder.org • Surging Seas can help your community participate in FEMAs Community Rating System. Contact us to learn more. • Climate Central offers tailored mapping, projections and analysis to meet the specific needs of cities, counties, states and businesses, using scenarios and data you can choose: contact sea levelfa climatecentral.org to learn more. Resources available for California • Sea Grant California: https://caseagrant.ucsd,edu/ • California Coastal Commission: Sea Level Rise: http:/Iwww.coastal.ca.gov/Climate/sir/ • State of California: Coastal Conservancy Climate Change Projects: http://scc.ca.gov/climate-change/ • Fora longer list see: sealevel.climatecentral.org/responses/plans Climate Central Climate Central is an independent nonprofit, nonadvocacy organization that researches climate impacts. Our web tools are basedon peer -reviewed science and are included as resources on national portals such as NOAA's Digital Coast and the U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit. Get more analysis at riskfinder.org 7 Statement on climate change from 31 scientific associations (2016). http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/06282016.pdf (Accocsr d .h,iv 7. 2016). Learn more athttp://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ level prajJjections from Kopp et al. 2014 (Earth's Future) anc tarctic research In DeConto and Item 10. - 166re). For full citations and methods visit: riskfinderorg HB -488- urging Seas Sea Level Rise Toots & Anaiysls by CLIMATES CENTRAL July 6 d, 2017 Jennifer Villasenor, Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 jvillasenor@surfcity-hb.org Re: Public Comment on draft of City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update (GPU) Dear Ms. Vilasenor: I write to express my enthusiastic support of the Huntington Beach General Plan item ERC- P.13, which calls for a feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) plan. Simply put, I prefer to choose my own energy providers. Currently, my only choice is to purchase energy from Southern California Edison, which charges the second-highest rates in California. Community Choice Aggregation is a better alternative, because it would foster free market competition leading to lower rates. In addition, CCAs can stimulate the development of high- tech energy suppliers within Huntington Beach, which would create local jobs and benefit our economy. Moreover, by offering multiple tiers of service with different levels of renewable energy, CCA would allow Huntington Beach to cheaply and sustainably meet its goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions without relying on industry or consumer regulations. The transition to renewable energy would also improve local air quality. Finally, if Huntington Beach embraces sustainable energy via CCA, it would reinforce our culture and identity as a "Surf City" that protects beaches by slowing sea level rise. Because HB Huddle is committed to individual freedoms, the well-being of Huntington Beach residents, and environmental protection, it follows that we are committed to CCA as well. Community Choice Aggregation will help Huntington Beach meet its vision of a healthy and safe city in which natural resources are protected (May 2017 draft, General Plan). For example, the General Plan envisions that in the near future, "local attractions, such as the beach... draw tourists from near and far". In fact, tourism is listed as one of the top employment sectors in the city. Yet, sea level rise threatens most—if not all—of the city's beaches. CCA would help mitigate this threat by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing climate change, which is the cause of sea level rise. In addition, the city's support of sustainable energy can be used in marketing campaigns to reinforce the "Surf City" image and draw additional tourists. The General Plan also envisions that by 2040, "the community has shifted to renewable energy resources and conservation practices. Support for local businesses to develop new technologies leads to the use of these technologies to support further conservation and sustainability." CCA is an economically responsible means of shifting to renewable energy via free market forces. Furthermore, CCA will establish a local market for energy production, which will lead to the development of new energy technologies within the city. The shift to renewable energy sources will reduce air pollution generated by fossil fuel burning. Importantly, CCA would help the city meet its state-mandated requirement to specify measures that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As highlighted in the General Plan, "Although often overlooked, modern life in Huntington Beach would be very difficult without abundant local and regional energy resources." I emphasize that CCA is a responsible and sustainable way to meet this important need, and I respectfully requests that the City Council carefully consider this option. Sincerely, Karen Coyne 18778 Club Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 H_B -489- Item 10. - 167 From: KIRK NASON To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject: Public Comment on draft of City Date: Thursday,July 06,2017 12:46:12 PM JUly 6rd, 2017 Public Comment on draft of City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update (GPU) Ms. Vilasenor, I write to express my enthusiastic support of the Huntington Beach General Plan item ERC- P.13, which calls for a feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) plan. Simply put, I prefer to choose my own energy providers. Currently, my only choice is to purchase energy from Southern California Edison, which charges the second-highest rates in California. Community Choice Aggregation is a better alternative, because it would foster free market competition leading to lower rates. In addition, CCAs can stimulate the development of high-tech energy suppliers within Huntington Beach, which would create local jobs and benefit our economy. Moreover, by offering multiple tiers of service with different levels of renewable energy, CCA would allow Huntington Beach to cheaply and sustainably meet its goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions without relying on industry or consumer regulations. The transition to renewable energy would also improve local air quality. Finally, if Huntington Beach embraces sustainable energy via CCA, it would reinforce our culture and identity as a "Surf City" that protects beaches by slowing sea level rise, Because HB Huddle is committed to individual freedoms, the well-being of Huntington Beach residents, and environmental protection, it follows that we are committed to CCA as well. Community Choice Aggregation will help Huntington Beach meet its vision of a healthy and safe city in which natural resources are protected (May 2017 draft, General Plan). For example, the General Plan envisions that in the near future, "local attractions, such as the beach... draw tourists from near and far'. In fact, tourism is listed as one of the top employment sectors in the city, Yet, sea level rise threatens most—if not all—of the city's beaches. CCA would help mitigate this threat by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing climate change, which is the cause of sea level rise. In addition, the city's support of sustainable energy can be used in marketing campaigns to reinforce the "Surf City" image and draw additional tourists. The General Plan also envisions that by 2040, "the community has shifted to renewable energy resources and conservation practices. Support for local businesses to develop new technologies leads to the use of these technologies to support further conservation and sustainability." CCA is an economically responsible means of shifting to renewable energy via free market forces. Furthermore, CCA will establish a local market for energy production, which will lead to the development of new energy technologies within the city. The shift to renewable energy sources will reduce air pollution generated by fossil fuel burning. Importantly, CCA would help the city meet its state-mandated requirement to specify measures that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As highlighted in the General Plan, "Although often overlooked, modern life in Huntington Beach would be very difficult without abundant local and regional energy resources." I emphasize that CCA is a responsible and sustainable way to meet this important need, and I respectfully requests that the City Council carefully consider this option. Item 10. - 168 HB -490- Sincerely, Kirk J. Nason 714 321-7298 Excuse brevity & typos HB -491- Item 10. - 169 STATH OFCALIFORNIA�:ALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G.BROWN Jr.,Govemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 s 3347 MICHELSON DRIVE,SUITE 100 IRVINE,CA 92612-8894 PHONE 949 724-2000 Serious drought. ar . FAX (949)724-2019 ]lelp save water! Tn' 711 www.dot.ca.gov July 6, 2017 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor File: IGR/CEQA City of Huntington Beach SCH#:2015101032 2000 Main Street IGR Log#: 2017-00601 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SR-1, SR-39, 1405 Dear Ms. Villasenor: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Project. The City of Huntington Beach has initiated a comprehensive program to update its General Plan, which establishes an overall development capacity for the city and serves as a policy guide for determining the appropriate physical development and character of Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to 2040). The draft General Plan Update project includes a GHG Reduction Program, a Coastal Resiliency Program (CRP) as well as identifies preparedness goals, actions and an implementation strategy. The Draft General Plan will update nine elements, which include Land Use, Circulation, Environmental Resources/Conservation, Natural and Environmental Hazards, Noise, Infrastructure/Public Services, Historic/Cultural Resources, Housing, and Coastal. Regional access to the city is provided by SR-1, SR-39, and I- 405. Caltrans Local Development-Intergovernmental Review program reviews impacts of local development to the transportation system, including the State Highway System. We work to ensure that local land use planning and development decisions include the provision of transportation choices, including transit, intercity rail passenger service, air service, walking and biking, when appropriate. Caltrans advocates community design (e.g. urban infill, mixed use, and transit oriented development) that promotes an efficient transportation system and healthy communities. Caltrans is a responsible and commenting agency on.this project and has the following comments: 1. The City needs to coordinate and submit Caltrans District 12 LD-IGR unit for review and comment any future project specific proposals and developments in proximity or along SR-1, SR-39, and I -405. -Provide a safe,sustainable, integrated and effciew trarnsportation'gstern to enhance California's economy)'and livability" Item 10. - 170 HB -492- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July 6, 2017 Page 2 2. Figure CIRC-2 on page 3-14, the west end of Hamilton Avenue near Beach Boulevard is proposed as "Proposed Primary" Arterial Highway. However, in Figure CIRC-3 on page 3-15, the same section of Hamilton Avenue is denoted as "deleted from Master Plan of Arterial Highways". Is the City planning to extend Hamilton Avenue to Beach Boulevard? If yes, what is the proposed construction year? If no, please address the impact of mobility especially, in regards to Pacific Coast Highway. Please continue to keep us informed of this project and any future developments that could potentially impact State transportation facilities. If you have any questions or would like to meet with us regarding these comments, please do not hesitate to call Maryam Molavi at (657)328- 6280. If you have additional traffic-related questions in regards to the above comments, you may contact Jose Hernandez, Traffic Operations at (657)328-4611. Sincerely, MAUREEN EL HARAKE Branch Chief, Regional-Community-Transit Planning District 12 "Provide a safe,sustainable, integrated and efficient transponarion system to enhance California s ernnnnry and fivabilio," HB -493- Item 10. - 171 i S REALTY INVESTMI.NTS July 7, 2017 Jennifer Villasenor,, Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: City General Plan Update and Magnolia Tank Farm Project Dear Ms. Villasenor, As you are aware, Shopoff Really Investments, on behalf of SLF—HB Magnolia, LLC, has submitted applications to the City for the Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan project ("Tank Farm Project"). On June 20, 2017 the City Council initiated the formal environmental assessment process to analyze the Tank Farm Project. We are grateful to the City for commencing this process and we look forward working with the City in the future as we continue our public outreach efforts. Concurrently, the City has also been processing a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan("GPU"). We have been following this effort, but have not previously offered formal comments on the proposed GPU. We are now submitting this letter, as owners of the site, regarding land designations being considered in the GPU for the Tank Farm Project site. As you know, we are in the process of preparing entitlement applications for the Tank Farm Project which will include a proposed General Plan Amendment and a comprehensive specific plan. We expect that our application will be submitted and deemed complete within the next few weeks. In the meantime, it is certainly possible, and perhaps likely, that the City will take action on the GPU update prior to the completion of the environmental assessment of the Tank Farm Project. We recognize that the May 2017 version of the proposed GPU Land Use Map designates the Magnolia Tank Farm site as "Public" (P) -- which is consistent with the prior version of the City's General Plan. We understand that this designation has long been considered a "holding pattern" land use designation until a development was proposed on the Tank Farm.Project site. We are also aware that Alternative Land Uses—including Research and Technology uses—have been considered for the Tank Faun Project site as part of the GPU effort. We recognize that the Tank farm Project will require discretionary legislative approvals from the City as well as a comprehensive environmental assessment process pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Accordingly, regardless of the land use designation that is applied to our Project site as part of the GPU update, the purpose of this letter is to request that the City acknowledge our pending application as part of the GPU update. Because the City Council has already approved the commencement of our environmental assessment, we believe it is important to acknowledge our Item 10. - 172 1-IB -494- 1�"a, poff.com I Tel:949-417-1396 I Fax:949-417-1_-- -v' hopoff.com 1 2 Park Plaza,Suite 700, Irvine,CA 92614 pending application so that the record is clear that the City Council may consider and take action to approve, or disapprove, future General Plan and Specific Plan proposals for the Tank Farm Project Site regardless of the land use designation that is applied to the site as part of the GPU. Simply stated, we believe the Record must be clear that whatever action the City takes on the GPU as it relates to our project site, does not and will not foreclose the City's ability to consider new General Plan land use designations for the Tank Farm Project site in the future. We thank you for your attention to this request and we look forward to working with the City in the future as we process our project entitlements. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions at Jomalley@shopoff.com or(949) 769-6714. n erely, r Ja es M. O'Malley V; e President of Development, Sh o £Realty Investments cc: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council HB -495- Item 10. - 173 www.shopoff.com I Tc1:949-4i7-1396 1 Fax:949-417-1 111J -u' 1- hopoff,com ( 2 Park Plaza,Suite 700, (vine,CA`"—"` " '_ - July 31d, 2017 Jennifer Villasenor, Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 jvillasenor@surfcity-hb.org Re: Public Comment on draft of City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update (GPU) Ms. Vilasenor, My name is Steve Shepherd, and I am writing to comment of the draft of the City of Huntington Beach's General Plan Update. I have lived in the City of Huntington Beach for nearly 30 years and also run a small business with my wife in the City. To say that I have a vested interested in the future of Huntington Beach would be an understatement. It is with the love of our City and the future of my family in mind that I offer the following comments. Specifically, I wish to offer my STRONG SUPPORT for the Huntington Beach General Plan Item ERC- P.13, which calls for a feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) plan. This would appear to be a "no brainer" in terms of possible benefits to the City of Huntington Beach: residence, businesses, and environment. I support the further investigation into CCA viability in the City of Huntington Beach for five main reasons: 1) choice/competition, 2) local control, 3) local economic benefit, 4) increased local security, and 4) environmental leadership. First, I don't like monopolies! I like a competitive market where I am allowed to choose. Right now SCE is the only game in town. If I want power for my home and business, I am forced to buy power from SCE. I would like to have a choice, and a focal choice at that. A Huntington Beach or Coastal Orange County CCA would provide me with a choice when purchasing my electricity Second, I like local control, and I want services and policies tailored to benefit my community. SCE services 14 million customers from coastal Orange County to the California/Nevada border. It's simply impossible for SCE to focus their service goals on the specific needs and desires of our community here in Huntington Beach. By California State law a CCA must be locally controlled and managed by a not-for-profit administrative board. Whereas SCE's first responsibility is to their shareholders, a CCA would be located in and accountable to our community and residents. Third, whenever possible, I find it preferable to deal with local businesses and entities, and I make an effort to buy goods and services in Huntington Beach. Why not the same for my electricity? I would much rather pump my hard-earned dollars into our local economy than sending my cash to SCE who commission services and makes investments over 50,000 square miles service area. How much of the money I send to SCE every month is coming back and invested in Huntington Beach? In addition to having my money staying local when I pay my power bills, I also see how a CCA could create more local jobs in the areas of design, engineering, construction, and skilled-labor as it relates to infrastructure upgrades and sustainable energy expansion. Item 10. - 174 HB -496- Fourth, as our community prepares to face future security threats -whether physical or cyber based - local control over our power will be key to keeping our essential services functioning and our residents safe. As seen in other active CCA's, various communities have sought to expand and solidify their local energy needs by upgrading local power generation and distribution. By developing more local power via renewable sources such as solar and wind and then coupling it with the development of a local "microgrid", Huntington Beach can minimize risks of power disruption and better assure the safety of its citizens. Fifth, as a coastal resident, I like to be a good steward for our environment. Our local environment - ocean, beaches, wetlands, clean water and clean air - was one of the things that originally attracted me to Huntington Beach decades ago, and now that my adult children and grandchild live here as well, I want to pass along our community's natural wonders to them. A CCA appears to be a good vehicle that will allow me to be both a good business person as well a good coastal steward. I see a terrific opportunity for renewable energy production through both wind and solar in Surf City, and given the importance of preserving our coastline and wetlands, this would appear to be a "win-win" for both my business and our environment future. While this is just "one resident's opinion", there is a mass of supporting data not only for the points I've raised but other positives associated with CCA's including - a way to comply with State Law requiring Greenhouse Gas Reductions, competitive advantage in attracting new businesses and investment into the City, regional environmental leadership, increased eco-tourism, etc., etc. As highlighted in this letter, I STRONGLY SUPPORT Huntington Beach General Plan Item ERG-P.'13 and urge the City Council to move forward with a full investigation into the feasibility of a Community Choice Aggregation for Huntington Beach, Respectfully Submitted, Steven C. Shepherd, Architect 9462 Waterfront Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 HB -497- Item 10. - 175 From: Dan Jamieson To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject: comment,HB general plan update Date: Thursday,July 06,2017 4:14:40 PM Dear Ms. Villasenor: Thank you for taking comment on the Huntington Beach (City) General Plan update (GPU). My suggested changes and comments follow. Specify Goals for Parks, Open Space,Trails The GPU should better explain park-service areas and buffers, and include a park- deficit analysis for each service area. (See, for e.g., the Newport Beach GP and its narrative for park service areas. http://www.newportheachca.gov/PLN/General_Plan/09_Ch8_Recreation_web.pdf). The current draft GPU is unclear in this regard, and gives the City no guidance as to which areas of the City might be underserved by parks. The City should also maintain its current stated 5.4 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. The 5-acre goal sets too low a bar, essentially giving the City permission to continue its high rate of development without adding any new parks or open space. The GPU should include an affirmative statement that the City will dedicate the appropriate developer fees for the acquisition of new parks and open space. Furthermore,the City's parkland acreage total should include just the first 100 feet of beach, similar to Newport Beach's policy. The GPU should include language about improving public access to coastal areas, especially Huntington Harbor, where public access to the bay is severely limited. This should include enhanced access with waterfront public walkways, and protection from encroachments such as piers, floats, bulkheads and private/gated communities. The final GPU should also mention the planned improvement of the City-owned rail spur in North Huntington Beach, previously the Navy railroad right-of-way (Navy ROW). The draft GPU notes that parts of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way running east of Gothard Street is designated for a future transportation corridor. The Navy ROW runs generally east- west and connects with this Union Pacific spur, which runs north-south. Since the Navy ROW is already abandoned, it should be a priority for improvement as part of a future regional multi- use trailway. Indeed, the City has planned and budgeted money for this very purpose. (The city of Westminster has similar plans for its section of the Navy ROW. Unfortunately, a Item 10. - 176 HB -498- misguided plan to store cars on the City portion of the Navy ROW seems to have delayed implementation of the trailway plan.) Ultimately, the Navy ROW spur and the Union Pacific right-of-way could connect into a much broader regional transportation system. Plus, an improved Navy ROW would be a wonderful attraction for employees who work in and around the McDonnell Centre Business Park and desire a quick break from city life. All of these railroad right-of-way projects would support the General Plan's goal of preserving railroad right-of-ways and improving transportation and recreational opportunities. Consider Extending the new Research &Technology Zoning to the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan north of Bolsa Avenue. Promote Green Development. The GPU proposes a new land-use designation, Research and Technology (RT), to enable a broader mix of lower-intensity industrial and commercial uses to attract new, growing businesses to the City. The current GPU proposes RT zoning south of Bolsa Avenue only. However, implementing RT development in this area will require the turnover and redevelopment of individual parcels. This will be a slow, patchwork process, unlikely to create the kind of environment that cutting-edge employers will desire. In addition to a high-bandwidth infrastructure, these firms will want restaurants, entertainment and other visitor-serving and commercial amenities. Open areas for eating, meeting and breaks from the workday will also be desired. Additionally, walkways and bike trails would be key additions to attract tech firms. All of these amenities are in short supply south of Bolsa, or simply do not exist. Further, the existing parcels south of Bolsa are generally small, raising the question of whether many of these parcels will be large enough to accommodate the light manufacturing planned for the RT area. However, as Boeing exits the McDonnell Centre Business Park (MCBP) area, most of its existing land will be available for redevelopment. As a result, the City should consider the MCBP area for the new RT zoning. Large-scale redevelopment in the MCBP will be a prime opportunity to "jump start" implementation of the new RT zoning on a sizeable and integrated parcel, and begin to attract the kind of high-growth, high-value businesses and jobs the City desires. Within the RT zoning in the current MCBP area, the City should consider a mix of shops and eating/drinking establishments, open areas, public walking and biking space, and recreational facilities. I generally support the concept outlined in LU-P.14 of the GPU, allowing housing in RT areas. Any housing should be compatible with the zoning. For example, industrial, loft-type housing, plugged into the high-bandwidth of the area, located above or incorporated with nonresidential buildings, could help attract high tech businesses and employees, the latter of HB -499- Item 1.0. - 177 which could walk or bike to work. The typical condos,townhomes and other multi-story residential units that litter much of the City now should not be built in RT-zoned parcels and would do nothing to distinguish RT-zoned areas. Please keep in mind that the MCBP area is the main entry point to the City's Northwest corner. The current Boeing facility has a recreation area with ball fields, tennis courts, a gym, basketball and volleyball courts, and landscaping including eucalyptus groves. The property makes a positive impression of the City as visitors enter. It would be a shame if the campus- like setting of the current Boeing property was lost to more of the non-descript warehouses that exist north of the property. These look-alike warehouses are carbon copies of industrial properties that can be found anywhere in Southern California. Building more of these buildings at the Northwest gateway to the City would mark Huntington Beach as just another faceless, sprawling suburb, rather than the type of world-class research and technology center that the City envisions. The General Plan should promote green development, including in the MCBP and RT zoned land. This should include provisions for green, energy-efficient and self-sufficient buildings, use of native plants and water-wise landscaping, prohibitions on the use of the wasteful turf slopes used by many commercial buildings, and inclusion of public open areas and walkways/trails within any development plans. Green development will help attract clean and green manufacturing. Finally, please note that the Northwest Industrial Subarea is also bordered by residential areas to the north (Spa Drive and surrounding streets). This fact should be incorporated into the GPIJ. The draft GPIJ says the area is bordered to the north by commercial developments and the 405 freeway. Sincerely, Dan Jamieson Huntington Beach Item 10. - 178 HB -500- From: ejacobs(asocal.rr.com To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject: RE:community comments to city plan Date: Thursday,July 06,2017 4:21:56 PM Thankyou for your note. I cannot copy and past it,the wrong document kept coming up. Basically,it was support for the city's continuing effort to protect the environment and support the study of a CCA. 1 apologize for the inconvenience.Thank you for your consideration. Ellen ---- "Villasenor wrote: >Hi, >I received your comment letter,but cannot open it. Will you please provide it in a different format(word or pdf)? Or you can copy and paste directly into the body of your email. Thanks. >Jennifer >-----Original Message----- •From: ejacobs@socal.rr.com [mailto:e.iacob cocal.rr.com s ] >Sent:Thursday,July 06,2017 3:31 PM >To:Villasenor,Jennifer >Subject:community comments to city plan >Thank you for your consideration of the attached public comment. Hs -501- Item 10. - 179 From: Greg Kordich To: Villasenor.Jennifer Subject: Re:CCA Date: Thursday,July 06,2017 5:58:53 PM Hi Jennifer, My wife and i are in support of the CCA study.We think it would generate incon-le for the city and propel us as a leader in energy. We thought councilman Pedersons derogatory remarks about Antonia Grahams fine work for the city on CCA shows his extreme ignorance of her job duties and the CCA. WHAT a negative BLOW HARD. THANK YOU JENNIFER for your diligent work. Greg and Lynn Kordich 88369 Leeward dr. H. B. 92646 On Jul 6, 2017, at 4:39 PM, Villasenor, Jennifer wrote: Hello, I received an email, but there was no attachment and no text in the body of the email. Thank you. Jennifer From: Greg Kordich [mailto:llk2@mac.com) Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 4:30 PM To: Villasenor, Jennifer Subject: CCA Item 10. - 180 HB -502- July 6rd, 2017 Jennifer Villasenor, Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 jviIlasenor@surfcity-hb.org Re: Public Comment on draft of City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update (GPU) Dear Ms. Villasenor, I completely agree with the following letter. I write to express my enthusiastic support of the Huntington Beach General Plan item ERC-P.13, which calls for a feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) plan. Simply put, I prefer to choose my own energy providers. Currently, my only choice is to purchase energy from Southern California Edison, which charges the second-highest rates in California. Community Choice Aggregation is a better alternative, because it would foster free market competition leading to lower rates. In addition, CCAs can stimulate the development of high-tech energy suppliers within Huntington Beach, which would create local jobs and benefit our economy. Moreover, by offering multiple tiers of service with different levels of renewable energy, CCA would allow Huntington Beach to cheaply and sustainably meet its goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions without relying on industry or consumer regulations. The transition to renewable energy would also improve local air quality. Finally, if Huntington Beach embraces sustainable energy via CCA, it would reinforce our culture and identity as a "Surf City" that protects beaches by slowing sea level rise. Because HB Huddle is committed to individual freedoms, the well-being of Huntington Beach residents, and environmental protection, it follows that we are committed to CCA as well Community Choice Aggregation will help Huntington Beach meet its vision of a healthy and safe city in which natural resources are protected (May 2017 draft, General Plan). For example, the General Plan envisions that in the near future, `local attractions, such as the beach... draw tourists from near and far". In fact, tourism is listed as one of the top employment sectors in the city. Yet, sea level rise threatens most—if not all—of the city's beaches. CCA would help mitigate this threat by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing climate change, which is the cause of sea level rise. In addition, the city's support of sustainable energy can be used in marketing campaigns to reinforce the "Surf City" image and draw additional tourists. The General Plan also envisions that by 2040, "the community has shifted to renewable energy resources and conservation practices. Support for local businesses to develop new technologies leads to the use of these technologies to support further conservation and sustainability." CCA is an economically responsible means of shifting to renewable energy via free market forces. Furthermore, CCA will establish a local market for energy production, which will lead to the development of new energy technologies within the city. The shift to renewable energy sources will reduce air pollution generated by fossil fuel burning. Importantly, CCA would help the city meet its state-mandated requirement to specify measures that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions, As highlighted in the General Plan, "Although often overlooked, modern life in Huntington Beach would be very difficult without abundant local and regional energy resources." I emphasize that CCA is a responsible and sustainable way to meet this important need, and I respectfully request that the City Council carefully consider this option. Sincerely, Juana Mueller, member HB Huddle Hs -503- Item 10. - 181 lI T ' �T� C A M P A I G N July 7, 2017 Jennifer Villasenor,Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 _jvillasenor@surfcity-hb.org Re: Comments on EIR for the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update Dear Ms. Villasenor, Climate Action Campaign (CAC) is a San Diego-based environmental nonprofit organization with a simple mission: to stop climate change and protect our quality of life. Orange County for Climate Action (OCCA) is a grassroots activist network striving to address the threat of global climate change and mitigate its harmful effects through local action in Orange County. We are committed to helping local governments in southern California develop and implement policies, plans, and regulations that will stop climate change and protect the people and places we love for generations to come. CAC and OCCA appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the EIR for the City of Huntington Beach's General Plan Update. The comments below focus on Appendix G, the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GGRP). Please accept the comments below, which address the shifts necessary in the GGRP to meet those criteria. 1. The GGRP Tracks State Targets Using Mass Emissions To Measure Cit, ide Reductions. We are pleased to see that the GGRP intends to reduce citywide emissions in line with state targets by implementing General Plan Policy ERG-5A, which calls for reduction of emissions 15% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 53.33% below that target by 2040. Achieving these reductions will put Huntington Beach on track to meet state goals, summarized below: • In 2016, SB 32 was signed into law, codifying Governor Brown's Executive Order B-30-15 setting a GHG reduction goal of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. These targets are in tine with what is needed to protect our quality of life using best available science and are consistent with the Executive Order S-3-05, which calls for an SO percent statewide GHG reduction by 2050. 1 Climate Action Campaign 14452 Park Blvd.Suite 209,San Diego,CA 92116 1 619-419-1222 Item 10. — 1 82 info@climateactioncampaig HB -5 04-'limateActionCampaign.org CLIMATE GTl C A M P A I G N 2. GGRPs Serving as CEQA Mitigation foi•a General Plan Must Include Enforceable & Measurable Strategies Since the GGRP will serve as mitigation for the General Plan Update, its reduction targets must be enforceable and measurable as mitigation under CEQA. Mitigation measures must be enforceable and once adopted, cannot be defeated by ignoring them. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21081.6(b); Sierra Club v. County of San Diego, 231 Cal. App. 4th 1152, 1167 (2014).) In addition, CEQA itself requires enforceable mitigation measures. (CEQA Guideline §15126.4(a)(2) ["Mitigation measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other legally binding instruments."]. "A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures." (Pub. Res. Code §21081.6(b)). Because the GGRP is a mitigation measure, it must be enforceable. Finally, where a GGRP is mitigation for the activities in the planning horizon of a GP,there must be enforceable standards with detailed deadlines, as well as substantial evidence that each rnitigation nleasur"e will achieve the GHG reduction nunaber•s assigned to each strategy. By including enforceable, detailed measures in a GGRP, the city can help ensure that the plan meets legal muster and fulfills its requirements under CEQA. Unfortunately,the GGRP for Huntington Beach contains primarily both unmeasurable and voluntary strategies and actions to reach its GHG reduction targets. In the Executive Summary, the GGRP states it will reach targets by "emphasizing actions that are voluntary, economically viable, consistent with community character, and advance the priorities of Huntington Beach residents, businesses, and visitors." That preference for voluntary actions holds throughout the plan. For example: • T-4 - Carsharing: Attract carshare services to Huntington Beach and promote them as a supplemental transportation service. • CA-2 - Green building awareness: Raise community awareness of green building strategies for new and significantly renovated buildings. Most strategies are not measurable, which makes them unenforceable. For example: • RE-6 - Community Choice Aggregation: Explore the feasibility of launching a community choice aggregation program to increase local control of energy sources. • EE-2 - Rental unit retrofits: Improve energy efficiency in residential rental units. Climate Action Campaign 14452 Park Blvd.Suite 209,San Diego,CA 921 lfi 1 619-419-1222 info@climateactioncampaig HB -505-1imateActionCampaign.org Item 10. - 183 CLIMA1 ` ION C A M P A I G N • WW-I - Indoor water efficiency: Reduce indoor water use in the community. These strategies should be rewritten to include pleasurable targets. For example, the City of San Diego's Climate Action Plan contains goals, associated actions, and measurable targets that allow the city to evaluate whether the goals have been met.' 3. ImPlementation and Monitoring Should Include Timeline and Cost Analysis We commend Huntington Beach for planning for annual monitoring of progress toward emissions reductions targets and the publication of annual progress reports. The city should additionally commit to completing a full GHG inventory at least every three years, to allow the city and the public to gauge progress made toward implementing GGRP strategies, determine whether the local government is on track to meet GHG targets, and assess if adjustments are needed. The final GGRP should include a system to help city officials effectively prioritize strategies for implementation, and it should include a cost analysis for each strategy. These components allow the public to track whether the city is on track to meet its targets and help local governments set sufficient budgeting and staff levels at the appropriate time. 4. The GGRP Should Include Established Best Practices for Climate Planning We further urge the GGRP for Huntington Beach to include best practices for climate planning established by cities throughout California, including 100 percent renewable energy, significant transportation mode share targets, and jobs and social equity measures. 100 Percent Renewable Energy The Climate Action Plans of the cities of San Diego and Del Mar commit to 100 percent clean energy by the year 2035, and several other cities across the region are expected to make similar commitments this year. In addition, as noted previously, California Senate Leader Kevin de Leon has introduced legislation to transition the entire state to 100 percent clean energy by 2045. We recommend that Huntington Beach include a 100 percent clean energy goal, which closely aligns with California Executive Orders B-30-15 and S-3-05 (in fact, for cities that tie their Climate Plans to their General Plan updates it is often the only way to hit long-term state GHG targets). By embracing a 100 percent clean energy future, all families of Huntington Beach will benefit because renewable energy helps clean the air, builds healthy communities, and spurs local ' https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/final_july_2016_cap.pdf Climate Action Campaign 14452 Park Blvd.Suite 209,San Diego,CA 92116 1 619-419-1222 Item 10. - 184 info@climateactioncampaig KB -50(-,IunateActionCampaign.org ------ _. I . v-- 3 / f CLIMATE S C A M P A I G N investment and well-paying jobs from clean energy technologies. In addition, adding a 100 percent clean energy goal in Huntington Beach would signal a region-wide commitment to the shift to renewables. It is increasingly clear that 100 percent clean energy is the future in California and across the nation: the City of Huntington Beach's GGRP should reflect a commitment to keep pace with the region and the state. Transportation Mode Share Targets Currently, the GGRP identifies the following mode share performance measures: bicycle mode share at 2.65% in 2020 and 3,45% in 2040, and bus ridership at 2% in 2020 and 5% in 2040. The plan should also identify pedestrian mode share in both 2020 and 2040, Further, the plan should specify whether the mode share targets identified are for all trips or for commutes only. Finally, the city should consider adopting more ambitious mode share targets. For example, the City of San Diego states its goal as, "Achieve mass transit mode share of 12% by 2020 and 25% by 2035 in Transit Priority Areas, achieve walking commuter mode share of 4% by 2020 and 7% by 2035 in Transit Priority Areas, and, achieve 6%bicycle commuter mode share by 2020 and 18% mode share by 2035 in Transit Priority Areas."These ambitious goals were adopted because transportation remains a significant source of GHG emissions. Shifting away from reliance on cars as the primary mode of transportation reduces GHG emissions and has the co-benefits of improved public health, safety, and air quality. Ambitious mode share goals also help municipalities plan and budget to facilitate a shift away from car-centric growth, as well as advocate for assistance for better transit infrastructure. Improvements to bicycle infrastructure should focus on separated bikeways, which recent research has demonstrated are far more effective at increasing ridership than painted bike lanes.' Jobs and Social Equity While climate change impacts everyone, it hits hardest in low-income and communities of color that face a disproportionate pollution burden. The State of California has recognized the challenges facing Environmental Justice communities and prioritized those areas for allocation of Cap and Trade funds. San Diego was the first city in California to adopt a CAP that utilizes a statewide monitoring tool called C alEnviro Screen,which identifies vulnerable communities and can be used to direct investment and benefits to these neighborhoods. We recommend that Huntington Beach's GGRP include an Environmental Justice section that utilizes CalEnviroScreen to prioritize populations hit first and worst by climate change. Programs in EJ z Pucher, John, and Ralph Buehler. 2016. "Safer Cycling Through Improved Infrastructure."American Journal of Public Health 106(12): 2090-1. Climate Action Campaign J 4452 Park Blvd, Suite 209,San Diego,CA 92116 1 619-419-1222 info@climateactioncampaig HB -507--lunateActionCampaign.org Item 10. - 185 'CLIMATE TE GTION C A M P A I G N communities alight include ensuring all populations in the city have access to solar energy, home energy efficiency upgrades, and green spaces. Lastly, the city should address how GGRP strategies can create good-paying jobs for residents and improve quality of life in neighborhoods throughout the Huntington Beach. Conclusion Thank you again for the opportunity to weigh in on this critically important planning document. According to the most recently available data and climate science, there is nob eater threat to the future of humanity than climate change. It is incumbent on us to protect our kids and grandkids from the adverse impacts of a heated planet. Therefore, we must employ public policy that facilitates new ways to power our lives and move tl—ough our cities while sharply reducing our GHG emissions. We also encourage Huntington Beach to embrace the economic opportunities embedded in a clean energy economy. California has proven that improving our environment and improving our economy go hand in hand. The most successful cities are those which are planning for a 21 st century economy powered by renewable energy and clean energy jobs. We look forward to continued participation in the public review process for the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and would be happy to provide additional information or clarification in order to ensure that this planning document preserves public health and enhances quality of life for all Huntington Beach families. Sincerely, Sophie Wolfram, Policy Advocate sophie cni climateactioncai-npaign.org Roger J. Gloss, Advocacy, Special Projects rogengloss a occlimateaction.org Climate Action Campaign 14452 Park Blvd.Suite 209,San Diego,CA 92116 1 619-419-1222 Item 10. - 186 info@climateactioncampaigHB -508-;IimateActionCampaign.org EDMOND M.CONNOR MATTHEW J.FLETCHER DOUGLAS A. HEDENKAMP C IF iH MICHAEL SAPIRA N JAM ES M. AH DAM R. AH CONNOR, FLETCHER & HEDENKAMP LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW July 7, 2017 VIA E-MAIL AND HAND DELIVERY Ms. Jennifer Villasenor Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 JVillasenor@surfcity-hb.org Re: Draft Program Environmental Impact Report for City's General Plan Update Dear Ms. Villasenor: We are the attorneys for the Ocean View School District ("OVSD") and we have been asked to provide you with OVSD's comments on the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report SCH No, 2015101032 (the "Draft EIR") for the General Plan Update currently being processed by the City of Huntington Beach (the "City"). In addition to comments on the Draft EIR, we will also be providing comments on the General Plan Update itself. As a threshold matter, we note that, after the 45-day review period for the Draft EIR ends on July 7, 2017, the City has scheduled two public study sessions regarding the General Plan Update to be held on July 11 and 25, 2017. OVSD kindly requests that the Draft EIR review period be extended until after the July 25th study session in order to give OVSD and the public a better opportunity to fully understand the components and impacts of the General Plan Update before being required to submit final written comments on the Draft EIR. In this regard, we specifically request that the public comment period be extended to Friday, July 28, 2017. We understand that the Draft EIR is a Program EIR and is thus a first-tier document under Guideline section 15168(a). However, a first-tier EIR is still required to analyze the environmental impacts of the development associated with and facilitated by the General Plan Update. For that reason, we believe that it would be beneficial for all involved if the public comment period were extended until after all interested commentators, such as OVSD, were able to learn more about the General Plan Update and the possible impacts relating thereto. 2211 MICHELSON DRIVE,SUITE 1100 IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92612 T:949.622.2600 E-MAIL:eco...r(nlhncinessllt.com HB -509- Item 10. - 187 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July 7, 2017 Page 2 OVSD'S COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIR A. Project Description Section 3.3 In order for the Draft EIR to properly identify and analyze the environmental impacts that would result if the General Plan Update were adopted by the City Council, the Project Description needs to accurately describe the development that is anticipated to occur with adoption of the Update. Unfortunately, the Project Description falls short of this goal for the reasons set forth below: 1. The Draft EIR does not adequately identify the location of proposed development. Figure 3-3 depicts existing land uses based on a GIS database created in 2005 and updated in 2014. Figure 3-4 shows the proposed development capacity. However, to try to compare these two Figures to determine what changes are actually being proposed is extremely difficult and yields no positive results. Notably, Figure 8 in Appendix J, Existing Land Use Technical Report, depicts the parcels that were changed between 2005 and 2014. The Draft EIR needs to provide a similar Figure, along with a Table, showing the parcels and specific plans that are predicted to intensify and thereby generate the additional residential units and the additional non-residential square footage assumed in the Project Description. 2. The Project Description states the General Plan Update establishes an overall development capacity of 7,228 residential units. However, this does not appear accurate in light of what is stated in Section 4.14 Transportation/Traffic. On page 4.14-10, the Draft EIR states that "the majority of[the 7,2281 dwelling units would be low density residential followed by medium high density." In contrast, however, Table 4.14-1, General Plan Update Land Use and Trip Generation Summary, assumes a decrease of 1,361 single-family dwelling units and an increase of 8,589 multi-family medium residential units. Therefore, the majority of the proposed development will not be single-family dwellings, but, rather, multi-family units. Given these inconsistencies, the Project Description needs to provide an accurate, detailed account of the number and type of residential units anticipated to be developed following the adoption of the General Plan Update. 3. Table 3-2, Land Use Designations, is inconsistent with the Project Description and the Transportation/Traffic sections of the Draft EIR and needs to be revised to accurately describe the development associated with the General Plan Update. Table 3-2 indicates a development capacity of 88,964 dwelling units. However, Table 3-3 indicates a different number: 85,360 dwelling units. Table 4.14-1 in the Transportation/Traffic section states yet another figure: 85,483. The Draft EIR needs to eliminate these inconsistencies, clarify the development capacity assumptions, and consistently analyze the project throughout the Draft EIR. 4. Table 3-2 needs to provide the Density/FAR range for the Mixed Use Overlay, Specific Plan Overlay, and Mixed-Use land use designations and explain the assumptions depicted in Table 3-3, Proposed General Plan Update Development Capacity. Item 10. - 188 HB -510- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor J July 7, 2017 Page 3 5. The two overlay designations, Specific Plan Overlay and Mixed Use Overlay, are unclear on Figure 3-4, Land Use Map. A separate map showing the locations of the Specific Plan Overlay and the Mixed Use Overlay should be provided. 6. The Project Description states the General Plan Update establishes an overall capacity of 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential development. This figure is not consistent with what is stated in Section 4.14, Transportation/Traffic. On page 4.14-10 of the Draft EIR, the additional 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential development is described. However, Table 4.14-1, General Plan Update Land Use and Trip Generation Summary, shows that there is actually a net difference of 13,099,000 square feet of additional non-residential development over the existing condition. Even with considering only Commercial and Industrial/Manufacturing, the increase is 6,525,000 square feet of additional non-residential development. The Project Description needs to be corrected to accurately describe the additional development capacity to be generated by the General Plan Update. 7. On page 4,14-11, the Draft EIR explains that the General Plan Update assumes the highest growth will occur in Multi-Family Residential, Commercial, and Industrial/Manufacturing land uses over the next 25 years. As noted above, the Project Description describes a lower amount of anticipated development (5,384,920 sq. ft.), but there are no land use regulations or restrictions incorporated into the General Plan Amendment to achieve this lower figure. The General Plan Update needs to incorporate policies and implement land use restrictions in order to ensure that development associated with the Update does not exceed 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential development. Alternatively, the Project Description and impact analysis need to be revised. 8. On page 3-19, Technology and Innovation Subareas, the Project Description for the Northwest Industrial Subarea identifies potential land use compatibility issues, but needs to explain what assumptions were used in arriving at the conclusion that the introduction of the Research and Technology land use designation in areas adjacent to single-family residential neighborhoods would be more compatible with surrounding sensitive uses than the "typical industrial uses." 9. On page 3-19, Technology and Innovation Subareas, Gothard Overlay, the Project Description needs to be corrected to accurately depict the existing condition and the anticipated condition with the implementation of the Gothard Subarea. Although the Project Description identifies the proximity of the Gothard Subarea to sensitive uses, it incorrectly states that there is merely a"potential"for land use compatibility issues. Over the past several years, (a) public testimony at various City Council and Planning Commission meetings, (b) public testimony at hearings held by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and (c) the issuance of numerous air quality Notice of Violations have conclusively demonstrated that there are serious land use conflicts in the Gothard Subarea between the industrial and sensitive land uses. This needs to be adequately described in the Draft EIR. 10. On page 3-19, Technology and Innovation Subareas, Gothard Overlay, although the Project Description identifies the proximity of the Gothard Subarea to sensitive uses, it fails to describe the existing environmental justice designation of the Oak View neighborhood that is directly impacted by the Gothard Subarea. CalEnviroScreen has identified the Oak View 1-IB -511- Item 10. - 189 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July 7, 2017 Page 4 Community, defined by its census tract, as a community of concern for environmental justice due to its proximity to industrial land uses. OVSD operates an elementary school and a preschool, serving over 900 students in the Oak View community. This area has the highest pollution burden of 81 — 90% in the city of Huntington Beach. B. Air Quality Section 4.2 The Air Quality Section of the Draft EIR does not adequately analyze the air quality impacts associated with the General Plan Update and needs to be revised as described below: 11. The Draft EIR needs to be revised to indicate what land use data is being used to determine the baseline condition for air quality. Without such data, the air quality impacts associated with the development allowed under the General Plan Update cannot be properly understood or analyzed. 12. The analysis set forth on page 4.2-2 in Section 4.2.1.2, Local Air Quality, is inadequate and needs to be revised to comprehensively describe the existing local air quality conditions and sources of existing pollutants. At a minimum, the following revisions need to be made to the Draft EIR: a) The air quality Notice of Compliance, Notice of Violation and Abatement actions by the SCAQMD that have occurred in the Planning Area since 2012 need to be addressed and should be identified by location on a map of the Planning Area. b) The discussion in the Local Air Quality section is limited to solely identifying carbon monoxide hotspots in the Planning Area. The Draft EIR needs to provide justification for only addressing one air quality threshold. c) A Particulate Matter Hot Spot Analysis needs to be conducted for the Planning Area using either CAL3QHCR or AERMOD to determine existing areas of particulate matter generation. d) Air pollution sources in the Planning Area, such as major arterials, freeway, industrial land uses, need to be identified and addressed, in addition to vehicle miles traveled. e) Section 4.2.1.2, Local Air Quality, needs to be revised to provide information on the health impacts of roadway pollutants on adjacent sensitive land uses as described in the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, Chapter 9, Near Roadway Exposure and Ultrafine Particles concerning the health effects of exposure to roadway ultrafine particles, including asthma exacerbation, decreased lung function, increased heart disease, increased risk of low birth weight and premature delivery, lower immune function and increased risk of Type 2 diabetes. In addition, children are among the most susceptible and greatly affected by exposure to traffic-related pollutants and an analysis of project impacts on school-age children needs to be included. Item 10. - 190 HB -512- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor I July 7, 2017 Page 5 13. Draft EIR Volume I-Technical Background Reports, Air Quality, includes a Figure 1, TAC Emitters. However, there is no discussion about Figure 1. For example, there is no analysis in the Draft EIR of the impact of the 67 TAC Emitters identified in Figure 1. TAC stands for Toxic Air Contaminants and SCAQMD has published Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (Exhibit 1) to establish the standards used to determine when an industry or business is identified as a TAC Emitter. The Draft EIR needs to be revised to provide information on existing TAC Emitters with respect to location, threshold exceedance, AQMD rule violations, greenhouse gas emission exceedances in the Planning Area, and the recommendations from the Air Resource Board for locating sensitive receptors and inclusion of mitigation measures to lessen TAC emitter impacts. 14. The Draft EIR needs to provide justification as to why CalEEMod was not used for Localized Significance Thresholds. 15. Based on the increase in non-residential uses and the diesel emissions generated from trucks associated with the increase in industrial land use, the Draft EIR needs to prepare a Health Risk Assessment in accordance with SCAQMD Health Risk Assessment Guidelines for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel idling emissions for a CEQA air quality analysis. 16. The Draft EIR needs to prepare an air quality compatibility study for the General Plan Update using the California Air Resources Board Air Quality Land Use Compatibility Handbook. 17. The California Air Resources Board Air Quality Land Use Compatibility Handbook states; `In addition to source specific recommendations, we also encourage land use agencies to use their planning processes to ensure the appropriate separation of industrial facilities and sensitive land uses." The General Plan Update and Draft EIR need to incorporate policies and measures to reduce land use compatibility issues by: a) Prohibiting uses that potentially generate diesel emissions, TAC emitters, dust and odors generators within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive uses; b) Requiring increased setbacks and increased landscape requirements for uses in the Gothard Subarea; and c) Requiring conditional use permits for all uses in the Gothard Subarea and Northwest Industrial Subarea within 1,000 feet of existing sensitive uses. 18. Mitigation measures need to be incorporated in to the Draft EIR to ensure adequate distance between potential TAC emitters and sensitive land uses. OVSD requests the inclusion of the following mitigation measure at a minimum: All new industrial and commercial development projects that have the potential to emit TACs shall be required to be located an adequate distance from existing and proposed development used by sensitive receptors, unless a project-specific evaluation of human health risks is conducted and the results of the evaluation determine that no significant impact would occur to the satisfaction of the City's decision-making authority. Sensitive HB -513- Item 10. - 191 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor I July 7, 2017 Page 6 receptors include residential, schools, day care facilities, congregate care facilities, hospitals, or other places of long-term residency. The determination of development projects that have the potential for TAC emissions and adequate distances from sensitive receptors are identified in the California ARB's "Air Quality and Land Use Handbook—A Community Health Perspective (April 2005; California ARB Guidance). 19. Section 4.2.3, Project Impacts and Mitigation, needs to be revised to describe the air quality impacts of adding 13,099,000 square feet of non-residential development. The analysis needs to discuss types of pollutants expected from industrial and commercial land uses proposed in the General Plan Update. Appendix A of the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook:A Community Health Perspective, California Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board, April 2005, provides a table of Land Use Classifications and Associated Facility Categories That Could Emit Air Pollutants, see Exhibit 2 and the impact on sensitive land uses adjacent to industrial land uses. 20. Section 4.2.3, Project Impacts and Mitigation, also needs to be revised to analyze the projected increase in TAC Emitters anticipated with adding 13,099,000 additional non-residential square footage under the General Plan Update. 21. Section 4.2.3, Project Impacts and Mitigation, Localized Significance Thresholds, assumes that "Development project resulting from the implementation of the General Plan Update would be required to undergo environmental review, at which time LST analysis would be applicable."However, this is not the case and should not be assumed by the Draft EIR. The existing zoning for Industrial, Zoning Code Section 212.04 Industrial General and Industrial Light list the Land Use Controls for Industrial Districts (Exhibit 3). There are a significant number of use classifications that are "permitted" in the Industrial District that have potential to emit key pollutants, such as laboratories, maintenance and repair services, research and development services, vehicle/equipment repair, vehicle storage, industrial, custom, industrial general, industrial limited, industrial R&D, and wholesaling, distribution and storage. These same use classifications are identified as associated with emitting air pollution in Appendix A of the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook:A Community Health Perspective, California Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board, April 2005. That Appendix provides a table of Land Use Classifications and Associated Facility Categories That Could Emit Air Pollutants. However, if these use classifications are permitted uses under the Zoning Code, the approval for development is ministerial, not discretionary, and no air quality analysis will be required for development. Section 4.2, Air Quality, needs to be revised to include mitigation measures that require all industrial and commercial uses to apply for and obtain conditional use permits prior to development to ensure that the assumed environmental review and air quality analysis are conducted prior to development. 22. Section 4.2.3.3 states: "The General Plan Update does not propose, nor would it facilitate, land uses that would be considered significant sources of objectionable odors". However, this is not the case. In the Planning Commission Study Session Summary, dated June 13, 2017 (Exhibit 4) Research and Technology land use designation is described as including eating and drinking establishments that have industrial components for example a brewery. A brewery is odor generating not only at the facility, but also with respect to the waste that is generated by the process, including the mash and wastewater. The objectionable odor may also impact greenhouse gas emissions from sewers. (Exhibits 5 and 6). The Draft EIR Item 10. - 192 HB -5 14- iwili u. - _r / ✓ r-10 -01V- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July 7, 2017 Page 7 needs to be revised to analyze the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Research and Technology designation, which is an industrial classification. The Draft EIR should not assume that this land use is cleaner or greener unless mitigation measures and development standards are in place to require clean and green development. 23. The Impact Analysis in Section 4.2.3.2 needs to be corrected regarding creation of objectionable odors from industrial and research and development land uses. This analysis concludes that Zoning Code Section 204.12(D) is sufficient to reduce impacts from the General Plan Update to less than significant. The analysis seems to imply that the director [of Community Development?] has the discretion to prohibit industrial and research and technology development uses based on the anticipated production of offensive odor, dust, noise, vibration, but this is not the case. Zoning Section 204.12, Industrial Use Classification (Exhibit 7) describes Industrial, General as typically a high incidence of truck or rail traffic, and/or outdoor storage, chemical manufacturing, food processing, laundry and dry cleaning plants, concrete products and power generating. All of the uses are known to generate odors. Furthermore, Industrial, General is a permitted use under the Zoning Code Section 212.04. Only Research and Development includes the director's discretion concerning uses that generate air quality pollutants. 24. The Draft EIR needs to provide information on the types and numbers of Research and Development applications that the director has previously determined would produce offensive odor, dust, noise or vibration in order to understand how this process has worked to protect adjacent uses. In addition, the Draft EIR needs to explain how the director will exercise authority for ministerial projects. 25. The conclusion that the odors associated with the construction and operation of development under the General Plan Update would be less than significant is not supported by the analysis and needs to be revised. In addition, mitigation measures need to be included to reduce the odor impacts. The City needs to incorporate development standards and policies to reduce odor exposure in the Planning Area, such as requiring any operation that has the potential of producing odor to be within a carbon air filtered enclosure and requiring conditional use permits that examine all of the environmental impacts of the use. As noted above, a brewery has site odor issues, wastewater odor issues, and generates odors from disposing of waste mash. 26. The impact analysis for compliance with applicable air quality plans on page 4.2- 6 utilizes the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan ("2012 AQMP"). However, the conclusion that the General Plan Update is in compliance is based on 2016-2040 SCAG RTP/SCS, April 2016 population data. This inflates the population numbers to appear to be closer in compliance than is actually the case. If the Draft EIR relies on the 2012 AQMP, then it should use the 2012 SCAG RTP/SCS data. The 2012 SCAG establishes a 205,500 population figure compared to General Plan Update 211,051. Therefore the conclusion that the General Plan Update will result in a less than significant impact is incorrect and needs to be revised to show a significant impact. 27. Concerning population and employment data, the City's website provides current population data and 2013 employment data that identifies the population of Huntington Beach HB -515- Item 10. - 193 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor I FIH July 7, 2017 Page 8 as 202,413 in 79,353 households and the employment as 117,700. These numbers are significantly greater than what is being used in the regional planning documents especially for employment that results in significant air quality impacts that have not been analyzed by the Draft EIR or AQMP. The Draft EIR needs to explain why the City's own demographic data was not used to analyze the impacts of the General Plan Update. 28. The impact analysis for compliance with applicable air quality plans on page 4.2- 6 uses does not include employment that is part of compliance with the 2012 AQMP. SCAG RTPISCS 2012 establishes a maximum employment of 80,600 and the General Plan Update is predicting 87,000. The impact analysis needs to be revised to analyze compliance with applicable air quality plan for employment generated air quality impacts. 29. On page 4.2-8, the Draft EIR concludes that the General Plan Update "would be consistent with the 2012 and 2016 AQMP." However, there is no analysis showing how the update complies with the 2016 AQMP, particularly with employment. if the 2016 AQMP is the air quality plan for compliance purposes, then the Draft EIR needs to incorporate the revised standards, threshold, and mitigation associated with the 2016 AQMP into the General Plan Update. 30. On page 4.2-9, the Operation impact analysis understates the air pollutant emissions relating to the General Plan Update with respect to source categories typically associated with residential development. The Draft EIR needs to include source air pollutants associated with industrial development, such as dust and odor, diesel particulate matter, chemicals and solvents, VOCs, etc. Reference should be made to Air Quality Issues Regarding Land Use for additional information along with suggested goals, objectives and policies related to land use (Exhibit 8). 31. On page 4.2-9, the Draft EIR concludes that, with respect to predicting operational emissions generated by the development associated with the General Plan Update, there is no land use information. OVSD disagrees because the General Plan Update identifies growth between existing and 2040 by land use type with detailed square footage. The Draft EIR should include an analysis of projected operation emissions from the residential and the non- residential land uses associated with General Plan Update. The air quality analysis should provide a "worst case" analysis similar to what is provided for the circulation/traffic impacts. 32. On page 4.2-10, the Draft El states that SCAQMD does not recommend calculation of operational emissions for planning documents, such as the General Plan Update. The Draft EIR should reference the documentation that shows that this is SCAQMD's position regarding air quality impacts associated with adopting general plans. 33. The General Plan Update should include air quality mitigation goals to reduce exposure to sensitive uses, including the following: Through land use plans provide heightened consideration of policies and strategies to minimize exposure of sensitive receptors and sites (e.g., schools, hospitals, and residences) to health risks related to air pollution. Item 10. - 194 KB -516- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor CIFIH July 7, 2017 Page 9 34. On page 4.2-14, the Draft EIR states; "Future projects resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update would be required to undergo environmental analysis to determine whether each project results in significant air quality impact and would also have to implement policies from the General Plan Update to the extent feasible': This assumption is not well founded in that industrial land use categories are "permitted" in contrast to"conditionally permitted' uses under the Zoning Code. Also, industrial projects may seek a categorical exemption from CEQA for"infill" development. Therefore, these industrial uses, many of which have the potential to emit air pollutants, are approved without discretion and therefore no additional environmental analysis would be required prior to development. The air quality impact analysis cannot rely on future environmental analysis for ministerial industrial development projects or infill projects exempt from CEQA and needs to include mitigation measures to require subsequent air quality analysis for all commercial and industrial development associated with the General Plan Update. 35. On page 4.2-15 of the Draft EIR, the impact analysis for Localized Significance Thresholds states: "While specific construction and operational activity under the General Plan Update cannot be determined at this time and the General Plan Update does not contain any specific projects, there is no impact from LSTs due to the General Plan Update". Clearly, there are Localized Significance Thresholds("LSTs") associated with the development of 7,288 multi- family residential units and 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential development contemplated by the General Plan Update. The air quality analysis needs to be revised to include an analysis of these LSTs. 36. On page 4.2-18 of the Draft EIR, the air quality analysis concludes that the anticipated growth under the General Plan Update is consistent with the 2012 AQMP. The Draft EIR needs to provide information to support this conclusion since the air quality analysis used 2016 SCAG population and employment data, instead of 2012 SCAG data. 37. On page 4.2-19 of the Draft EIR, the analysis concludes that the General Plan Update will be consistent with the current AQMP, but it is unclear what AQMP this section is referring to and this should be clarified. 38. On page 4.2-19, the Draft EIR concludes that the General Plan Update would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to air quality and would result in less than significant cumulative impact due to inconsistency with the AQMP. However, there is no supporting analysis for this conclusion since employment data was not used, the amount of employment is significantly understated in SCAG and AQMP data, and 2016 population data was used for the 2012 AQMP, Therefore, the General Plan Update will, in fact, result in significant cumulative impacts due to inconsistency with the AQMP. This section needs to be revised to correctly analyze cumulative impacts associated with the General Plan Update. C. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Section 4.7 39. This Section states in the Environmental Setting that proximity of schools to waste facilities is an important factor when making decisions on the location of new development since children are more susceptible to hazardous materials and emissions. On page 4.7-4, the impact analysis needs to be revised to include exposure of hazardous materials HB -517- Item 10. - 195 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July 7, 2017 Page 10 to the Oak View neighborhood, Oak View Elementary and Preschool, CDC Preschool and Head Start preschool from potential toxic emissions and exposure from the Orange County Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center located on Nichols Lane, as well as Republic Services, an identified TAC emitter. The growth associated with the General Plan Update will increase the current use by residents and businesses of the collection center and transfer station resulting in greater risk of exposure to adjacent sensitive uses. OVSD requests that the City of Huntington Beach exercise its land use authority to relocate Orange County Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center to a more appropriate location that does not expose sensitive uses to accidental releases of hazardous materials. D. Land Use and Planning Section 4.9 40, The Draft EIR needs to provide consistent population, household and employment data for analysis throughout the document. The Land Use and Planning section identifies 78,175 residential housing units in 2014 and the General Plan Update is projected to add 7,228 residential units for a total of 85,403 household units at the 2040 build-out of the General Plan, However, SCAG and SCAQMD based regional plans on 81,200 households, this means that these regional plans were based on 4,203 fewer residential units. The Draft EIR must demonstrate its impact analysis is consistent with these regional plans in order to make a finding of less than significant impact. 41. As discussed in the Air Quality section referenced above, the City seems to have significantly understated its employment data that was used to formulate SCAG and SCAQMD regional plans. The City's website states there were 117,700 employed persons in 2013. The addition of 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential with the General Plan Update will significantly increase this number. Table 4.14-1 indicates that there will be an increase of 13,099,000 in non-residential development. Even if only increases in square footage associated with Commercial and Industrial uses were considered, it would still result in an increase of 6,525,000 square feet. Based on the data provided in Table 4.14-1, there are 1.3435 jobs per 1,000 square feet of non-residential development that would result in 17,599 additional jobs in Huntington Beach associated with the increase in non-residential development for a total employment figure of 135,299 in 2040. This is substantially more than the SCAG and SCAQMD AQMP projection of 87,000 in 2040. The Draft EIR needs to provide justification for the data used and must correct the inconsistencies that appear throughout the document. 42. On page 4.9-3, Open Space Land Use, the Draft EIR states the Planning Area includes 3,274 acres of open space, but the document needs to specify what percentage of these open space areas consist of school properties which are used as pocket parks by the City. The Draft EIR should use the most accurate data to discuss the existing condition and project conditions. 43. Section 4.9.2.3, Impact Analysis states that the General Plan Update assumes future development would be scaled to complement adjoining uses, but there are no mitigation measures or implementation policies to ensure that this assumption is borne out in connection with future development. The Draft EIR and General Plan Update need to be revised to incorporate mitigation and implementation measures and policies to ensure future development is scaled to complement adjoining uses. Item 10. - 196 HB -518- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July 7, 2017 Page 11 44. Section 4.9.2.3, Impact Analysis, states; "While non-residential maximum intensity/floor-to-area ratio is proposed to increase for some land use designations, the changes would reflect what is currently allowed under the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance." This statement is not accurate as presented in the Draft EIR since the new industrial classification of Research and Technology is a 1.0 FAR that is greater than the existing .75 FAR for industrial uses. The Draft EIR needs to provide a list of non-residential land use designations that will increase in maximum intensity/floor-area-ratio under the General Plan Update, but still be consistent with the current Zoning Code. 45. Public schools and the state Education Code required outdoor facilities (playgrounds) are an essential government function and need to be protected by the local land use control agency from land uses that diminish the function of the school's educational purpose. The Draft EIR needs to provide an analysis demonstrating that the City of Huntington Beach is supporting public school functions and using land use controls to reduce environmental impacts on school properties from the General Plan Update. 46. On page 4.9-5, the Impact Analysis states the Research and Technology land use designation will provide a buffer between the heavier industrial and non-industrial land uses. The Draft EIR needs to provide an analysis demonstrating how Research and Technology will provide a buffer since there are no development standards, or mitigation or implementation measures, to require "clean" uses. This assumption is not supported by the General Plan Update goals, policies and implementation measures and the Draft EIR needs to be revised to correct this. 47. On page 4.9-8, the assumption that Research and Technology within the Northwest Industrial and Gothard district would serve to attract less-intense industrial uses and reduce the amount of heavy industry within the planning area is not supported by the General Plan Update goals, policies and implementation measures and the Draft El R analysis of consistency with SCAG 2008 RCP needs to be revised to correct this. 48. On page 4.9-9, Table 4.9-1, SCAG 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Goals, the statement that the industrial and commercial land uses associated with the Research and Technology land use designation are more compatible with surrounding sensitive land uses is not supported by the General Plan Update goals, policies and implementation measures and the analysis of consistency with SCAG 2016-2040 RTP/SCS needs to be revised to correct this. 49. On page 4.9-11, the Draft EIR states; "Under the General Plan Update, the allowable floor-to-area ratio is proposed to be updated for several non-residential land use designations; however, these updates would align with the existing floor-to-area ratio requirements of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances." The Draft EIR needs to specify what non-residential land uses are proposed to be updated and should also explain how these updates are consistent with the existing FAR in the Zoning Code. There is no discussion in the General Plan Update about FAR updates. This analysis needs to be clarified and made consistent with the General Plan Update. HB -519- Item 10. - 197 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July7, 2017 '! Page 12 50. On page 4.9-13, Cumulative Impacts, the Draft EIR concludes that cumulative impacts associated with inconsistency of future development with adopted plans and policies would be less than significant based on anticipated review for consistency by the County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach, and other incorporated cities. This is circular reasoning and is not appropriate for analyzing cumulative impacts. The Draft EIR needs to be revised to provide adequate justification or should make findings of significant cumulative impact. 51. On page 4.9-13, Cumulative Impact, the Draft EIR concludes that future development would be substantially compatible with existing land uses. However, the General Plan Update and Draft EIR identify significant land use compatibility issues between existing sensitive uses and industrial uses that are expected to continue under the General Plan Update. Before a finding of less than significant cumulative impact can be made, this Section needs to be revised to identify the land use compatibility issues in the General Plan Update and provide mitigation measures to lessen land use incompatibly in the Planning Area. 52. On page 4.9-13, Cumulative Impact, the statement that subsequent CEQA review would minimize the potential for cumulative projects to physically divide an established community is not supported by the Impact Analysis in the Draft EIR or the General Plan Update and needs to be revised. 53. On page 4.9-13, Cumulative Impact, the Draft EIR states the General Plan Update would not conflict with existing land use plans, policies, or regulations of agencies with jurisdiction over the Planning Area. However, this is not a correct statement because it conflicts with analyses concerning air quality, noise, and regional plan consistency. This section needs to be revised to accurately describe the significant cumulative impacts associated with the General Plan Update. 54. The Draft EIR makes assumptions and conclusions about the environmental impacts and benefits of the proposed new Research and Technology land use classification. However, the General Plan Update and Draft EIR do not define or describe this land use with respect to permitted and conditionally permitted uses and development standards, such as setback, building height, and landscaping. In order to properly understand and analyze the environmental impacts on the Planning Area and surrounding land uses in the Northwest Industrial and Gothard Subareas, the General Plan Update should include information on what uses this land use category will include, what uses will be permitted by right, and what will be conditionally permitted. Since the Draft EIR relies on assumptions of the type of uses and development standards associated with the Research and Technology land use designation the proposed zoning should also be part of the Project Description. By not providing this important information until after the General Plan Update is approved, the City is engaging in improper segmentation of the project, which is prohibited by CEQA because, among other things, it prevents adequate mitigation measures from being considered and adopted. E. Noise Section 4.10 55. The Draft EIR needs to address Land Use-Noise Compatibility Standards when commercial and industrial uses are adjacent to sensitive land uses such as schools. Table 7 in Volume I, Technical Background Report, depicts the Noise Ordinance exterior standards. It Item 10. - 198 HB -520- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor July 7, 2017 Page 13 indicates that, for all industrial properties, the acceptable noise level is 70 dBA any time of day or night and residential properties have an acceptable noise level of 55 dBA daytime and 50 dBA nighttime. However, there is no listing for other sensitive land uses such as schools. The existing General Plan identifies sensitive uses to include schools, similar to what is stated in the General Plan Update and Draft EIR. Because of this inconsistency between the General Plan and the Noise Ordinance, industrial zoned uses were allowed to locate and expand across Nichols Lane from Oak View Elementary School. Even though the exterior noise standard in the General Plan for schools is up to 60 dBA, this standard was allowed to be violated by the permitted industrial use since its parcel had a 70 dBA standard. As explained in Volume I, Noise and Section 4.10 of the Draft EIR, the noise standard is not the loudest level of sound that can be emitted and still is in compliance with the standard. OVSD contends that, on any given school day, there are numerous significant noise events from surrounding Industrial Uses that are over 60 dBA in a four-hour period on the school playground that would result in interference with communication between children and children and teachers. The Draft EIR needs to incorporate mitigation measures and development standards to be adopted as part of the Noise Ordinance to eliminate land use conflicts concerning noise between industrial and commercial properties and sensitive land uses by applying the lower noise level standard. 56. The General Plan Update includes Goal N-1.A; Maintain acceptable stationary noise levels at existing noise-sensitive land uses such as schools, residential areas, and open space. However, unless the Noise Ordinance is revised to accomplish this goal, it will not be accomplished for the existing sensitive land uses currently impacted by noise from non- compatible land uses. The Draft EIR should adopt mitigation measures and the City should fund code enforcement for noise level violations. 57. The area of the City most impacted by noise from existing industrial users is the Oak View neighborhood identified, on page 4-13 of the General Plan Update, as a community of concern for environmental justice by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Disadvantaged communities such as Oak View bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, government and commercial operations or programs and policies. Children in minority and/or low-come population groups are more likely to be exposed to and have increased health risks from environmental pollution than the general population. In the recent past, a Huntington Beach code enforcement officer has indicated to the Oak View community that code enforcement is on a "complaint only" basis. Community members responded that they feared retaliation from landlords if they complained. Also, limiting code enforcement to only complaints requires citizens to be aware of complicated regulations and to understand their rights that are also compounded by the disadvantaged community status. The Draft EIR and General Plan Update need to adopt mitigation and policy measures to provide for active noise monitoring and to work with individual noise generators to bring their operations into compliance with the Noise Ordinance. 58. The General Plan Update includes significant increases in commercial and industrial land uses in the Planning Area. Commercial and industrial uses are associated with increase trucking, such as diesel truck traffic, and air brake and engine noise, that is greater than a passenger vehicle or light truck. The Draft EIR needs to analyze the increase in noise HB -521- Item 10. - 199 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor C11FJH July 7, 2017 Page 14 levels by type of vehicle generated from the proposed industrial uses, instead of only analyzing vehicle miles traveled for mobile noise source. 59. The General Plan Update has indicated that the areas that will have the most increase in industrial use are the Northwest Industrial and Gothard Subareas. Table 3 in Appendix K depicts the average 24-hour noise levels that currently exceed community noise level standards in these areas, LT-1 and LT-3. The Draft EIR needs to analyze these locations with respect to increases in noise levels that can be expected to occur with the implementation of the General Plan Update. 60. On page 4.10-4, the Draft EIR discusses noise sensitive receptors, but limits its discussion to sensitive land uses adjacent to major streets. The Draft EIR needs to be revised to identify other existing areas of the City that are experiencing high noise levels on a regular basis, such as the Oak View neighborhood due to nearby industrial uses. The Draft EIR needs to include mitigation measures to lessen noise impacts from stationary uses on existing sensitive land uses by the implementation of land use controls. 61. Similar to the air quality analysis, the noise analysis assumes that all development projects facilitated by the General Plan Update will prepare an acoustical study in order to mitigate the development projects impact on noise levels (N-2.A). This is not correct because many industrial land uses are permitted as ministerial uses under the Zoning Code. As such, there is no discretion to require an acoustical study. The Draft EIR needs to include a mitigation measure that all industrial and commercial development shall require a conditional use permit to ensure that all future development projects prepare acoustical studies as assumed in the Draft EIR. 62. On page 4.10-20, the Draft EIR concludes that the community ambient noise levels would result from vehicle-related noise, but that there are no available or feasible mitigation measures that would reduce ambient noise levels and exposure below the noise level standards for the community. OVSD disagrees with this conclusion and respectfully submits that the City needs to take proactive steps to reduce community ambient noise levels by establishing noise level limits for industrial uses in the Noise Ordinance, working with noise generators to bring operations into compliance with the Noise Ordinance, limiting hours of operation that generate noise levels that exceed adjacent sensitive land use standards and actively enforcing the Noise Ordinance without the necessity of a code violation complaint. F. Population, Housing, and Employment Section 4.11 63. The population, housing and employment data presented in this Section of the Draft EIR is not consistent with the data present in (a)Appendix L, Economic Development Trends and Conditions, (b) Section 4.14 Transportation/Traffic or (c) the City's demographic information. The Draft EIR appears to understate the population and employment numbers and in turn, understate the environmental impacts of the General Plan Update. The Draft EIR needs to be revised to state consistent data and to accurately analyze the environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update through year 2040. Item 10. - 200 H B -522- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor � F I July 7, 2017 Page 15 64. On page 4.11-5, the Draft EIR states that the growth anticipated by the General Plan Update includes a minor amount of units to be added to the BECSP to account for potential future capacity increase. The Draft EIR need identify the number of residential units to be added to BECSP over the current limit of 2,100 units. This information should be included in the Project Description since it is a known assumption. G. Public Services Section 4.12 65. On page 4.12-11, the Draft EIR states that the General Plan Update will generate 4,770 additional elementary and 867 middle school students that will need to be accommodated by the City's three school districts. Since the additional 7,228 residential units are to be developed on land zoned for Medium Residential, the Draft EIR needs to provide information on the amount of anticipated additional Medium Residential development that will occur in each of the three school districts and it should also indicate the areas in the Planning Area where this residential development is assumed to occur in order for the OVSD to properly understand the impacts of the General Plan Update on its schools. 66. Although the Draft EIR assumes that the increase in residential development would occur downtown and in Holly-Seacliff, there is no goal, policy or implementation measure in the General Plan Update that would limit where residential development could occur in the Planning Area. At the June 13, 2017 Planning Commission study session on the General Plan Update, City staff stated that the residential units associated with the General Plan Update were redevelopment of single family to multi-family in Medium Residential zones. 67. The General Plan Update establishes only a net increase in residential units (7,228), but does not identify where these units will occur in the Planning Area or the type of residential unit to be developed. Table 4.14-1 in the Transportation/Traffic section is the only identification of the type of residential units, multi-family, that is assumed in the General Plan Update. Since there are no goals, policies or implementation measures to control where residential development occurs, it could reasonably be inferred that all additional units would be built within OVSD's boundaries. The Draft EIR needs to provide more detailed information regarding the impact of the General Plan Update on schools in the Planning Area. 68. The conclusion stated in the Draft EIR that the General Plan Update will not impact schools because existing schools are operating under capacity and non-operating schools are leased for other land uses is not supported by facts and needs to be revised. The reality is that some schools may be operating at or over capacity and would be significantly impacted by the General Plan Update. The Draft EIR cannot assume that the school districts can easily relocate students from one school to another, or open leased schools, to readily accommodate the additional students to be generated by the General Plan Update. The Draft EIR and General Plan Update need to include policies requiring the City and developers to coordinate with school districts regarding development associated with the General Plan Update. The current General Plan includes a policy to require development applicants to meet with school districts prior to submittal of development applications and this should be expanded to include the City and should be incorporated into the General Plan Update. HB -523- Item 10. - 201 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor � J July 7, 2017 Page 16 69. At the June 27, 2017 Planning Commission Study Session on the Draft EIR, staff explained that the 7,228 dwelling units associated with the General Plan Update were parcels in Medium Residential zones that had single family units that could be redeveloped for attached or multi-family units, thus increasing the existing number of units. Section 4.12, Public Services, states on page 4.12-11, "the General Plan Update would allow for an increase in residential development in the city, within certain areas, such as Holly-Seacliff and the Downtown area, likely to result in more residential development than others." As noted above, the Draft EIR needs to specify in detail where the additional residential development is anticipated to occur and state the number of expected residential units that are slated for each location. H. Recreation Section 4.13 70. On page 4.13-1, the Draft EIR states there are approximately 1,073 acres of parkland within 79 parks, golf courses, city facilities and beaches. The Draft El R needs to identify what percentage of the 1,073 acres is actually owned by OVSD and used by the City as pocket parks through an at-will arrangement with OVSD. Each of these pocket parks should be identified by name and location. 71. The Draft EIR should include an analysis regarding whether any of the school sites that are currently included in the 1,073 acres of parkland are subject to closure. Using the City parkland standard of 5 acres per 1,000 residents, the City would need 1,055 acres of parkland for the population projected with the implementation of the General Plan Update. Therefore, the Draft EIR should be revised to acknowledge that, even if there were a reduction of up to 18 acres of parkland associated with school closures, the City would still meet its parkland standard. 72. On page 4.13-2, the Draft EIR states that, even with a projected population of 211,051 residents by 2040, the goal of 5 acres per 1,000 residents would be met. The Draft EIR needs to state whether there is any anticipation that parkland will be decreased with the implementation of the General Plan Update. I. Alternatives Analysis of Proiect Alternatives 73. On page 5-8, Section 5.3.3, Alternative 3: Gothard Corridor Land Use Change (Gothard Corridor Alternative), the Draft EIR states that the Research and Technology land use would "result in a marked increase in trip generation" that would result in increased noise and air quality impacts than the existing industrial land use category. OVSD disagrees with this conclusion because, if Research and Technology is cleaner and greener as assumed in the General Plan Update and Draft EIR, it would not generate diesel truck trips associated with heavy industrial uses normally anticipated in the Industrial land use classification. The analysis for Alternative 3 relies solely on an increase in ADT to determine the environmental impacts of that Alternative. The traffic study for Rainbow Environmental Services established a passenger vehicle equivalent for determining impact from the anticipated truck traffic at 3 to 1, Exhibit 9. In order for the community to understand the potential impacts of implementation of the General Plan Update, the analysis in Alternative 3 needs to be revised to include a discussion of diesel truck traffic similar to what the City used for the traffic study associated with Rainbow Environmental Services. Item 10. - 202 HB -524- Ms. Jennifer Villasenor J July 7, 2017 Page 17 74. Even though it would result in a higher FAR and associated ADT, Alternative 3 is the superior environmental alternative because the uses would be cleaner and greener due to significantly reduced diesel trucking generated by heavy industrial operations. 75. Given the impacts identified in the Alternative 3 analysis of using the new Research and Technology land use as a buffer between industrial and sensitive land uses, OVSD submits that a reasonable project alternative to be analyzed in the Draft EIR would be to reduce industrial intensity in the Gothard Subarea. This alternative could be accomplished by reducing the industrial FAR to .35 instead of .75. This would result in reduced vehicle miles traveled, ADT, air quality and noise impacts on the Oak View neighborhood. This alternative would be the environmentally superior alternative compared to the project. The City could still accomplish its project objectives by increasing industrial acreage in the Northwest Industrial Subarea. The Draft EIR should be revised to include an analysis of this alternative. Once again, OVSD respectfully requests that the Draft EIR comment period be extended to July 28, 2017, for the reasons stated on page 1 above. In addition, OVSD looks forward to receiving the City's written responses to each of the comments set forth above. V my yours, d and M. Connor Enclosures HB -525- Item 10. - 203 Exhibit Item 10. - 204 HB -526- South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive,Diamond Bar,CA 91765-4182 (909)396-2000 •www.aglnd.gov a e . 1 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds Mass Daily Thresholds ' Pollutant Construction b Operation' NTOx 100 ibs/day 55 lbs/day VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day PM2.5 55 ibs/day 55 lbs/day sox 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day CO 550 lbs/day 5 50 lbs/day Lead 3 lbs/day 3 lbs/day Toxic Air Contaminants(TACs), Odor, and GHG Thresholds TACs Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk> 10 in 1 million (including carcinogens and non-carcinogens) Cancer Burden>0.5 excess cancer cases(in areas> 1 in 1 million) Chronic&Acute Hazard Index? 1.0(project increment) Odor Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402 GHG 10,000 MT/yr CO2eq for industrial facilities Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants d NO2 SCAQMD is in attaitunent;project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards: 1-hour average 0.18 ppm(state) annual arithmetic mean 0.03 ppm(state)and 0.0534 ppm(federal) PM10 24-hour average 10.4 µg/m3 (construction)e&2.5 µg/m3 (operation) annual average 1.0 rn3 PM2.5 24-hour average 10.4 µg/1113 (construction)e &2.5 µg/m3 (operation) S02 I-hour average 0.25 ppm (state)&0.075 ppm(federal—991h percentile) 24-hour average 0.04 ppm(state) Sulfate 24-hour average 25 µg/m3(state) CO SCAQMD is in attainment;project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards: I-hour average 20 ppm(state)and 35 ppm(federal) 8-hour average 9.0 ppm(state/federal) Lead 30-day Average 1.5 µg/rn3(state) Rolling 3-month average 0.15 µg/m3(federal) Source: SCAQMD CEQA Handbook(SCAQMD, 1993) h Construction thresholds apply to both the South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley(Salton Sea and Mojave Desert Air Basins). For Coachella Valley,the mass daily thresholds for operation are the same as the construction thresholds. d Ambient air quality thresholds for criteria pollutants based on SCAQMD Rule 1303,Table A-2 unless otherwise stated. `Ambient air quality threshold based on SCAQMD Rule 403. KEY: lbs/day=pounds per day ppm=parts per million µg/m'=microgram per cubic meter ? =greater than or equal to MT/yr CO2eq=metric tons per year of CO2 equivalents >=greater than HB -527- Item 10. - 205 Revision: March 2015 — -- Exhibit Item 10. - 206 KB -528- APPENDIX A LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS AND ASSOCIATED FACILITY CATEGORIES THAT COULD EMIT AIR POLLUTANTS (4) Land Use (2) (3) Air Pollution Classifications— Facility or Project Examples Key Pollutants"'"' ;� Permits by Activity' COMMERCIAL/LIGHT INDUSTRIAL; SHOPPING, BUSINESS, AND COMMERCIAL Dry cleaners; drive-through restaurants;gas dispensing facilities; ♦ Primarily retail shops auto body shops; metal plating shops; and stores,office, photographic processing shops; Limited; Rules for commercial textiles; apparel and furniture VOCs,air toxics, including applicable activities, and light upholstery; leather and leather diesel PM, NOx, CO, Sox equipment industrial or small products; appliance repair shops; business mechanical assembly cleaning; printing shops ♦ Goods storage or handling activities, characterized by loading and unloading goods at Warehousing;freight-forwarding VOCs, air toxics, including warehouses, large centers; drop-off and loading areas; diesel PM, NOx, CO, SOx N° storage structures, distribution centers movement of goods, shipping, and trucking. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ♦ Medical waste at Incineration;surgical and medical research hospitals instrument manufacturers, Air toxics, NOx, CO,SOx Yes and labs pharmaceutical manufacturing, biotech research facilities ♦ Electronics, electrical apparatus, Computer manufacturer;integrated components, and circuit board manufacturer; semi- Air toxics,VOCs Yes accessories conductor production ♦ College or university Medical waste incinerators; lab Air toxics, NOx, CO,SOx, lab or research chemicals handling, storage and PM10 Yes center disposal Satellite manufacturer;fiber-optics ♦ Research and manufacturer; defense contractors; development labs space research and technology; new Air toxics,VOCs Yes vehicle and fuel testing labs ♦ Commercial testing Consumer products;chemical labs handling, storage and disposal Air toxics,VOCs Yes A-1 HB -529- Item 10. - 207 APPENDIX A (�) (4) Land Use (2) (3) Air Pollution Classifications— Facility or Project Examples Key Pollutants""` Permits;v by Activit ' INDUSTRIAL: NON- ENERGY-RELATED Adhesives; chemical;textiles;apparel and furniture upholstery; clay, glass, and stone products production;asphalt materials; cement manufacturers, wood products; paperboard containers and boxes; metal plating; metal and canned food product fabrication;auto manufacturing; food processing; printing and publishing; drug, vitamins, A, Assembly plants, and pharmaceuticals;dyes; paints; pesticides; photographic chemicals; VOCs, air toxics, including manufacturing polish and wax; consumer products; diesel PM, NOx, PM, CO, Yes facilities, industrial metal and mineral smelters and Sox machinery foundries;fiberboard;floor tile and cover;wood and metal furniture and fixtures;leather and leather products; general industrial and metalworking machinery; musical instruments; office supplies; rubber products and plastics production; saw mills; solvent recycling;shingle and siding;surface coatings INDUSTRIAL: ENERGY AND UTILITIES ♦ Wafer and sewer Pumping stations;air vents;treatment VOCs,air toxics, NOx, Yes operations Co, Sox, PM10 Power plant boilers and heaters; ♦ Power generation portable diesel engines;gas turbine Nox, diesel PM, NOx, Yes and distribution engines Co, SOX, PM10,VOCs Refinery boilers and heaters; coke VOCs, air toxics, including ♦ Refinery operations cracking units;valves and flanges; diesel PM, NOx,CO, SOX, Yes flares PM10 ♦ Oil and gas Oil recovery systems; uncovered wells Nox, diesel PM,VOCs, Yes extraction Co, Sox, PM10 ♦ Gasoline storage, Above and below ground storage VOCs, air toxics, including transmission, and tanks; floating roof tanks;tank farms; diesel PM, NOx, CO, SOX, Yes marketing pipelines PM10 ♦ Solid and hazardous Landfills; methane digester systems; waste treatment, process recycling facility for concrete VOCs, air toxics, NOx, Yes storage,and and asphalt materials CO, Sox, PM10 disposal activities. CONSTRUCTION (NON- TRANSPORTATION PM(re-entrained road dust),asbestos,diesel Limited; state and federal off- road Building construction;demolition sites PM, NOx, CO, SOX, PM10,VOCs d equipment standards A-2 Item 10. - 208 KB -530- APPENDIX A (4) Land Use (2) (3) Air Pollution Classifications— Facility or Project Examples Key Pollutants`"' ;" Perm its by Activity' DEFENSE Ordnance and explosives demolition; Limited; range and testing activities; chemical VOCs, air toxics, including prescribed production; degreasing;surface diesel PM, NOx, CO, SOx, burning; coatings;vehicle refueling;vehicle and PM10 equipment and engine operations and maintenance solvent rules TRANSPORTATION VOCs, NOx, PM(re- Residential area circulation systems; entrained road dust)air parking and idling at parking toxics e.g.,benzene, ♦ Vehicular movement structures; drive-through diesel PM,formaldehyde, No establishments;car washes; special acetaldehyde, 1,3 events;schools;shopping malls, etc. butadiene, CO, SOx, PM10 ♦ Road construction Street paving and repair; new highway VOCs,air toxics, including and surfacing construction and expansion diesel PM, NOx, CO, SOx, No PM10 ♦ Trains Railroads;switch yards;maintenance yards Recreational sailing; commercial marine operations; hoteiling ♦ Marine and port Limited; activities operations; loading and un-loading; Applicable state servicing; shipping operations; port or VOCs, NOx,CO, Sox, and federal MV marina expansion; truck idling PM10,air toxics, including standards, and diesel PM♦ Aircraft Takeoff, landing, and taxiing;aircraft possible maintenance;ground support activities equipment rules ♦ Mass transit and school buses Bus repair and maintenance NATURAL RESOURCES Limited"; Agricultural Agricultural burning; diesel operated burning engines and heaters;small food Diesel PM, VOCs, NOx, requirements, ♦ Farming operations PM10,CO, Sox, applicable state processors; pesticide application; pesticides and federal agricultural off-road equipment mobile source standards; pesticide rules ♦ Livestock and dairy Dairies and feed lots Ammonia,VOCs, PM10 Yes" operations Limited; Off-road equipment e.g., diesel fueled Diesel PM, NOx, CO, Applicable ♦ Logging state/federal chippers, brush hackers, etc. SOx,PM10,VOCs mobile source standards Quarrying or stone cutting; mining; PM10, CO, Sox,VOCs, Applicable ♦ Mining operations drilling or dredging NOx, and asbestos in equipment rules some geographical areas and dust controls A-3 HB -53 i- Item 10. - 209 APPENDIX A (4) Land Use (2) (3) iii ii Air Pollution Classifications— Facility or Project Examples Key Pollutants ' Permits"' by Act ivit ' RESIDENTIAL Fireplace emissions Housing Housing developments; retirement (PM10, NOx,VOCs, CO, air toxics}; Nov" developments; affordable housing Water heater combustion (NOx,VOCs, CO) ACADEMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL A Schools, including Schools;school yards;vocational school-related training labs/classrooms such as auto Air toxics Yes/Nov" recreational activities repair/painting and aviation mechanics A Medical waste Incineration Air toxics, NOx, CO, Yes PM10 A Clinics, hospitals, convalescent homes Air toxics Yes These classifications were adapted from the American Planning Association's"Land Based Classification Standards." The Standards provide a consistent model for classifying land uses based on their characteristics. The model classifies land uses by refining traditional categories into multiple dimensions, such as activities, functions, building types, site development character, and ownership constraints. Each dimension has its own set of categories and subcategories. These multiple dimensions allow users to have precise control over land- use classifications. For more information, the reader should refer to the Association's website at http://www.planninq,oLg/LBCS/Generalinfo/. "This column includes key criteria pollutants and air toxic contaminants that are most typically associated with the identified source categories. Additional information on specific air toxics that are attributed to facility categories can be found in ARB's Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Report for the Air Toxics Hot Spots Program (May 15, 1997). This information can be viewed at ARB's web site at http:/Iwww.arb.ca.gov/ab2588/final96/guide96.pdf. Criteria air pollutants are those air pollutants for which acceptable levels of exposure can be determined and for which an ambient air quality standard has been set. Criteria pollutants include ozone (formed by the reaction of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight), particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and lead. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)combine with nitrogen oxides to form ozone, as well as particulate matter. VOC emissions result primarily from incomplete fuel combustion and the evaporation of chemical solvents and fuels. On-road mobile sources are the largest contributors to statewide VOC emissions. Stationary sources of VOC emissions include processes that use solvents(such as dry-cleaning, degreasing, and coating operations) and petroleum-related processes(such as petroleum refining, gasoline marketing and dispensing, and oil and gas extraction). Areawide VOC sources include consumer products, pesticides, aerosols and paints,asphalt paving and roofing, and other evaporative emissions. Nitrogen oxides(NOx) are a group of gaseous compounds of nitrogen and oxygen, many of which contribute to the formation of ozone and particulate matter. Most NOx emissions are produced by the combustion of fuels. Mobile sources make up about 80 percent of the total statewide NOx emissions. Mobile sources include on- road vehicles and trucks, aircraft,trains, ships, recreational boats, industrial and construction equipment, farm A-4 Item 10. - 210 HB -532- APPENDIX A equipment, off-road recreational vehicles, and other equipment. Stationary sources of NOx include both internal and external combustion processes in industries such as manufacturing,food processing,electric utilities, and petroleum refining. Areawide source, which include residential fuel combustion,waste burning, and fires,contribute only a small portion of the total statewide NOx emissions, but depending on the community, may contribute to a cumulative air pollution impact. Particulate matter(PM) refers to particles small enough to be breathed into the lungs(under 10 microns in size). It is not a single substance, but a mixture of a number of highly diverse types of particles and liquid droplets. It can be formed directly, primarily as dust from vehicle travel on paved and unpaved roads, agricultural operations, construction and demolition, Carbon monoxide(CO)is a colorless and odorless gas that is directly emitted as a by-product of combustion. The highest concentrations are generally associated with cold stagnant weather conditions that occur during winter. CO problems tend to be localized. An Air Toxic Contaminant(air toxic) is defined as an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serous illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. Similar to criteria pollutants, air toxics are emitted from stationary, areawide, and mobile sources. They contribute to elevated regional and localized risks near industrial and commercial facilities and busy roadways. The ten compounds that pose the greatest statewide risk are: acetaldehyde; benzene; 1,3-butadiene; carbon tetrachloride; diesel particulate matter(diesel PM);formaldehyde; hexavalent chromium; methylene chloride; para-dichlorobenzene; and perch loroethylen e. The risk from diesel PM is by far the largest, representing about 70 percent of the known statewide cancer risk from outdoor air toxics. The exhaust from diesel-fueled engines is a complex mixture of gases,vapors, and particles, many of which are known human carcinogens. Diesel PM is emitted from both mobile and stationary sources. In California,on-road diesel-fueled vehicles contribute about 26 percent of statewide diesel PM emissions,with an additional 72 percent attributed to other mobile sources such as construction and mining equipment, agricultural equipment, and other equipment. Stationary engines in shipyards,warehouses, heavy equipment repair yards, and oil and gas production operations contribute about two percent of statewide emissions. However,when this number is disaggregated to a sub- regional scale such as neighborhoods,the risk factor can be far greater. "'The level of pollution emitted is a major determinant of the significance of the impact. '"Indicates whether facility activities listed in column 4 are generally subject to local air district permits to operate. This does not include regulated products such as solvents and degreasers that may be used by sources that may not require an operating permit per se, e.g., a gas station or dry cleaner. "Generally speaking,warehousing or distribution centers are not subject to local air district permits. However, depending on the district, motor vehicle fleet rules may apply to trucks or off-road vehicles operated and maintained by the facility operator. Additionally, emergency generators or internal combustion engines operated on the site may require an operating permit. "Authorized by recent legislation S6700. "''Local air districts do not require permits for woodburning fireplaces inside private homes. However, some local air districts and land use agencies do have rules or ordinances that require new housing developments or home re-sales to install U.S. EPA certified stoves. Some local air districts also ban residential woodburning during weather inversions that concentrate smoke in residential areas. Likewise, home water heaters are not subject to permits; however, new heaters could be subject to emission limits that are imposed by federal or local agency regulations. "'"Technical training schools that conduct activities normally permitted by a local air district could be subject to an air permit. A-5 HB -533- Item 10. - 211 Exhibit Item 10. - 212 Ks -534- J �` 1 1 t L I%l i-I n, t o ;�Kl 0 ("Cl GF5 ZONING CODE Title 21 ZONING CODE—BASE DISTRICTS Chapter 212 1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS 212.04 IG and IL Districts—Land Use Controls In the following schedules, letter designations are used as follows: "T" designates use classifications pen-nitted in the I districts. "T" designates use classifications subject to certain limitations prescribed by the "Additional Provisions" which follow, "PC" designates use classifications permitted on approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. "ZA*" designates use classifications permitted on approval of a conditional use permit by the Zoning Administrator. "TU" designates use classifications allowed upon approval of a temporary use pen-nit by the Zoning Administrator, "P[U" for an accessory use means that the use is permitted on the site of a permitted use, but requires a conditional use permit on the site of a conditional use. Use classifications that are not listed are prohibited. Letters in parentheses in the "Additional Provisions" column refer to requirements following the schedule or located elsewhere in this zoning code. Where letters in parentheses are opposite a use classification heading, referenced provisions shall apply to all use classifications wider the heading. IG and IL Districts: Land Use Controls P=Permitted L=Limited(see Additional Provisions) PC=Conditional use permit approved by Planning Commission ZA=Conditional use permit approved by Zoning Administrator TU=Temporary use peniiit P/U=Requires conditional use permit on site of conditional use Not Permitted Additional IG IL Provisions Residential Group Residential PC PC (1) Public and Semipublic (A)(L) Community and Human Service Facilities P P (K) Day Care, General ZA ZA Heliports PC PC (N) Maintenance& Service Facilities ZA ZA Public Safety Facilities P P HB -535- Item 10. - 213 Religious Assembly ZA ZA Schools, Public or Private L-6 L-6 Utilities,Major PC PC Utilities, Minor L-7 L-7 (0) Commercial Uses (D)(L) Ambulance Services ZA ZA Animal Sales and Services Animal Boarding ZA ZA Animal Hospitals ZA ZA Artists' Studios P P Banks and Savings and Loans L-1 L-1 Building Materials and Services P P Catering Services - P Commercial Filming ZA ZA Commercial Recreation and Entertainment L-2 L-2 Communication Facilities L-12 L-12 Eating & Drinking Establishments L-3 L-3 w/Live Entertainment ZA ZA (R)(T) Food & Beverage Sales ZA ZA Hospitals and Medical Clinics - PC Laboratories P P Maintenance &Repair Services P P Marine Sales and Services P P Nurseries P P Offices,Business &Professional L-1 L-1 (G) Personal Enrichment L-9 L-9 (T) Personal Services L-1 L-1 Quasi-Residential PC PC (J) Research&Development Services P P Sex-Oriented Businesses (regulated by Ch. 5.70) L-11 L-11 Sex-Oriented Businesses(regulated by Ch. 5.60) PC PC (Q) Swap Meets, Indoor/Flea Markets PC PC (P) Vellicle/Equipment Sales & Services Service Stations L-4 L-4 Vehicle/Equipment Repair P P Vehicle/Equipment Sales/Rentals L-5 L-5 Item 10. - 214 HB -536- Vehicle Storage P ZA (H) Visitor Accommodations ZA ZA Warehouse and Sales Outlets L-8 L-8 Industrial (See Chapter 204) (B)(L)(M) Industry, Custom P P Industry, General P P Industry, Limited P P Industry, R &D P P Wholesaling, Distribution & Storage P P Accessory Uses Accessory Uses and Structures P/U P/U (C) Temporary Uses Commercial Filming, Limited P P (S) Real Estate Sales P P Trade Fairs P P (E) Nonconforming Uses (F) IG and IL Districts: Additional Provisions L-1 Only allowed upon approval of a conditional use pen-nit by the Zoning Administrator for a mixed use project, subject to the following requirements: A. Minimum site area: three acres. B. Maximum commercial space: 35% of the gross floor area and 50% of the ground floor area of buildings fronting on an arterial highway. C. Phased development: 25% of the initial phase must be designed for industrial occupancy. For projects over 500,000 square feet, the initial phase must include five percent of the total amount of industrial space or 50,000 square feet of industrial.space, whichever is greater. L-2 Allowed upon approval of a conditional use permit by the Zoning Administrator when designed and oriented for principal use by employees of the surrounding industrial development or when designed for general public use, after considering vehicular access and parking requirements. L-3 Allowed upon approval of a conditional use pennit by the Zoning Administrator when in a freestanding structure or as a secondary use in a building provided that no more than 20% of the floor area is occupied by such a use. L-4 Only stations offering services primarily oriented to businesses located in an. I District are allowed with a conditional use pennit by the Planning Commission. L-5 No new or used automobile, truck or motorcycle retail sales are permitted. L-6 Only schools offering higher education curriculums are allowed with conditional use permit approval by HB -537- Item 10. - 215 the Planning Commission.No day care, elementary or secondary schools are permitted. L-7 Recycling operations as an accessory use are permitted if more than 150 feet from R districts; recycling operations as an accessory use less than 150 feet fi-om R districts or recycling operations as a primacy use are allowed upon approval of a conditional use permit by the Zoning Administrator. See Section 230.44, Recycling Operations. L-8 Allowed upon conditional use permit approval by the Planning Commission when a single building with a minimum area of 100,000 square feet is proposed on a site fronting an arterial. The primary tenant shall occupy a minimum 95% of the floor area and the remaining 5%may be occupied by secondary tenants. L-9 Permitted if the space is 5,000 square feet or less; allowed by Neighborhood Notification pursuant to Chapter 241 if the space is over 5,000 square feet. L-10 Reserved. L-I l Allowed subject to the following requirements: A. A proposed sex-oriented business shall beat least 500 feet from any residential use, school, park and recreational facility, or any building used for religious assembly(collectively referred to as a "sensitive use") and at least 750 feet fi•om another sex-oriented business. For purposes of these requirements, all distances shall be measured from the lot line of the proposed sex-oriented business to the lot line of the sensitive use or the other sex-oriented business. The term "residential use"means any property zoned RL,RM,RMH, RH, RMP, and any properties with equivalent designations under any specific plan. To determine such distances the applicant shall submit for review a straight line drawing depicting the distances from the lot line of the parcel of land on which the sex-oriented business is proposed which includes all the proposed parking and: 1. The lot line of any other sex-oriented business within 750 feet of the lot line of the proposed sex-oriented business; and 2. The lot line of any building used for religious assembly, school, or park and recreational facility within 500 feet of the lot line of the proposed sex-oriented business; and 3. The lot line of any parcel of land zoned RL, RM,RMH, RM, and RN/JP and any parcels of land with equivalent designations under any specific plans within 500 feet of the lot line of the proposed sex-oriented business. B. The front fagade of the building, including the entrance and signage, shall not be visible from any major, primacy or secondary arterial street as designated by the circulation element of the General Plan adopted May 1996, with the exception of Argosy Drive. C. Prior to or concurrently with applying for a building permit and/or a certificate of occupancy for the building, the applicant shall submit application for Community Development Department staff review of a sex-oriented business zoning permit with the drawing described in subsection A, a technical site plan, floor plans and building elevations, and application fee. Within 10 days of submittal, the director shall determine if the application is complete. If the application is deemed incomplete, the applicant may resubmit a completed application within 10 days. Within 30 days of receipt of a completed application, the director shall determine if the application complies with the applicable development and performance standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Said standards include but are not limited to the following: 1. Chapter 203, Definitions; Chapter 212, Industrial Districts; Chapter 230, Site Standards; Chapter 231, Off-Street Parking and Loading Provisions; Chapter 232, Landscape Improvements; and Chapter 236, Nonconforming Uses and Structures. 2. Section 233.08(B), Signs. Signage shall conforn to the standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance except a. Such signs shall contain no suggestive or graphic language, photographs, silhouettes, Item 10. - 216 HB -538- drawings, statues, monuments, sign shapes or sign projections, or other graphic representations, whether clothed or unclothed, including without limitation representations that depict"specified anatomical areas" or "specified sexual activities"; and b. Only the smallest of the signs permitted under Section 233.08(B) shall be visible from any major, primary or secondary arterial street, such streets shall be those designated in the circulation element of the General Plan adopted May 1996, with the exception of Argosy Drive. 3. Compliance with Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter.' 70. D. The director shall grant or deny the application for a sex-oriented business zoning permit for a sex- oriented business. There shall be no administrative appeal from the granting or denial of a permit: application thereby pei7nitting the applicant to obtain prompt judicial review. E. Ten working days prior to submittal of an application for a sex-oriented business zoning permit for staff review, the applicant shall: (1) cause notice of the application to be printed in a newspaper of general circulation; and(2) give mailed notice of the application to property owners within 1,000 feet of the proposed location of the sex-oriented business; and the City of Huntington Beach,Department of Community Development by first class mail. The notice of application shall include the following: 1. Name of applicant; 2. Location of proposed sex-oriented business, including street address (if known) and/or lot and tract number; 3. Nature of the sex-oriented business, including maximum height and square footage of the proposed development; 4. The City Hall telephone number for the Department of Community Development to call for viewing plans; 5. The date by which any comments must be received in writing by the Department of Community Development. This date shall be 10 working days from staff review submittal; and 6. The address of the Department of Community Development. F. A sex-oriented business may not apply for a variance pursuant to Chapter 241 nor a special sign permit pursuant to Chapter 233. G. A sex-oriented business zoning permit shall become null and void one year after its date of approval unless: l. Construction has commenced or a certificate of occupancy has been issued, whichever comes first; or 2. The use is established. H. The validity of a sex-oriented business zoning permit shall not be affected by changes in ownership or proprietorship provided that the new owner or proprietor promptly notifies the director of the transfer. 1. A sex-oriented business zoning permit shall lapse if the exercise of rights granted by it is discontinued for 12 consecutive months. L-12 For wireless communication facilities see Section 230.96, Wireless Communication Facilities. All other communication facilities permitted. (A) Repealed. (B) A conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator is required for any new use or enlargement of an existing use, or exterior alterations and additions for an existing use located within 150 feet of an R district. The director may waive this requirement if there is no substantial change in the character of the use which would affect adjacent residential property in an R District. HB -539- Item 10. - 217 (C) Accessory office uses incidental to a primary industrial use are limited to 10% of the floor area of the primary industrial use. (D) Adjunct office and commercial space, not to exceed 25% of the floor area of the primary industrial use, is allowed with a conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator, provided that it is intended primarily to serve employees of the industrial use,no exterior signs advertise the adjunct use, the adjunct use is physically separated from the primary industrial use, any retail sales are limited to goods manufactured on-site, and the primary industrial fronts on an arterial. (E) See Section 241,22, Temporary Use Permits. (F) See Chapter 236,Nonconforming Uses and Structures. (G) Medical/dental offices, insurance brokerage offices, and real estate brokerage offices, except for on- site leasing offices, are not permitted in any I District. Administrative, management, regional or headquarters offices for any permitted industrial use, which are not intended to serve the public, require a conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator to occupy more than 10% of the total amount of space on the site of the industrial use. (H) Automobile dismantling, storage and/or impound yards may be permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission and the following criteria: (1) The site shall not be located within 660 feet of an R district. (2) All special metal cutting and compacting equipment shall be completely screened from view. (3) Storage yards shall be enclosed by a solid six-inch concrete block or masonry wall not, less than six feet in height and set back a minimum 10 feet from abutting streets with the entire setback area permanently landscaped and maintained. (4) Items stacked in the storage yard shall not exceed the height of the screening walls or be visible from adjacent public streets, (1) Limited to facilities serving workers employed on-site. (J) Limited to single room occupancy uses. (See Section 230.46.) (K) Limited to emergency shelters. (See Section 230.52, Emergency Shelters.) (L) Development of vacant land and/or additions of 10,000 square feet or more in floor area; or additions equal to or greater than 50% of the existing building's floor area; or additions to buildings on sites located within 300 feet of a residential zone or use for a permitted use requires approval of a conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator. The Community Development Director may refer any proposed addition to the Zoning Administrator if the proposed addition has the potential to impact residents or tenants in the vicinity (e.g., increased noise, traffic). (M) Major outdoor operations require conditional use permit approval by the Planning Commission. Major outside operations include storage yards and uses utilizing more than one-third of the site for outdoor operation. (N) See Section 230.40, Helicopter Takeoff and Landing Areas. (0) See Section 230.44, Recycling Operations. (P) See Section 230.50, Indoor Swap Meets/Flea Markets. (Q) See L-11(A)relating to locational restrictions. (R) Non.-arnplified live entertainment greater than 300 feet from a residential zone or use shall be pernitted without a conditional use permit. (S) Subject to approval by the Police Department, Public Works Department, and Fire Department and the Community Development Director. (T) Neighborhood Notification requirements when no entitlement required pursuant to Chapter 241. Item 1.0. - 218 HB -540- (3254-10/94, 3378-2/98, 3523-2/02, 3568-9/02, 3703-3/05, 3708-6/05, 3724-02/06, 3788-12/07, 3843- 11/09, 3860-2/10, 4039-12/14, 4092-10/16) View the mobile, version. KB -54 1- Item 10. - 219 Exhibit 4 o CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 14-002/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 14-001 (GENERAL PLAN UPDATE) June 13, 2017 SUMMARY ❑ Location: Citywide 0 Proposed Project: The draft General Plan Update is the fundamental policy document of the City of Huntington Beach and establishes an overall development capacity for the City and serves as a policy guide for determining the appropriate physical development and character of Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to 2040). It provides the framework for management and utilization of the City's physical and economic resources. By providing a basis for rational decision-making, the draft General Plan Update will guide civic decisions regarding land use, the design and/or character of buildings and open spaces, the conservation of existing housing and the provision of new dwelling units, the provision of supporting infrastructure and public services, the protection of environmental resources, the allocation of fiscal resources, and the protection of residents from natural and human-caused hazards. The City is updating its General Plan to ensure that the plan remains a useful tool, keeps pace with change, and provides workable solutions to current and future issues. The General Plan Update will provide a comprehensive policy framework that reflects growth, resource protection priorities, and recent state legislation, providing a blueprint for future development and resource conservation in Huntington Beach. The General Plan expresses the City's goals and articulates the City's intentions with respect to the rights and expectations of the general public, property owners, community interest groups, prospective investors, and business interests. State Law Requirements Each city and county in California is required to adopt a general plan and update the plan at regular intervals. Sections 65300-65404 and 6559065590.1 of the California Government Code establish the requirements for the minimum contents of the general plan and rules for adoption and subsequent amendments. Together, these portions of state law and General Plan Guidelines that are prepared and maintained by the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research establish the legal framework for the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update. Under state law, each General Plan must contain at minimum the following seven elements; Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Noise, Open Space, Conservation, and Safety. A General Plan may also contain optional elements to address and emphasize other subjects of local importance. Existing General Plan The City's current General Plan was last comprehensively updated in 1996. The current General Plan contains 16 elements within four chapters. The table below summarizes the various elements of the existing General Plan, where the date of the most comprehensive update is shown and the date of the most recent minor amendment, if any, also is provided in parentheses. HB -543- Item 10. - 221 Existing General Plan Elements Most Recent Update Community Development Chapter Land Use Element 1996, (amended 2013) Urban Design Element 1996 Historic and Cultural Resources Element 2015 Economic Development Element 1996 Growth Management.Element 2002, (amended 2004) Housing Element 2013 Infrastructure and Community Services Chapter Circulation Element 2013 Public Facilities and Public Services Element 1996, (amended 2002) Recreation and Community Services 1996, (amended 2012) Element Utilities Element 1996, (amended 2010) Natural Resources Chapter Environmental Resources/Conservation 1996, (amended 2004) Element Air Quality Element 1996 Coastal Element 2001, (amended 2011) Hazards Chapter Environmental Hazards Element 1996, (amended 2009) Noise Element 1996 Hazardous Materials Element 1996 Draft General Plan Update The draft General Plan Update incorporates components of the 1996 General Plan that are still applicable today, while reducing the number of optional elements and proposing a streamlined approach to the goals and policies. The General Plan Update also establishes a new Research and Technology (RT) land use designation within existing Industrially designated areas, which highlights and prioritizes the city's commitment to job growth and sustained economic growth and vitality. While the General Plan Update does not change any of the city's existing residential designations or propose new areas of residential land, it allows for continued residential growth within the city's current residential areas and established densities of those areas. The General Plan Update does not propose additional Specific Plans or changes to the maximum permitted density and intensity established by each adopted Specific Plan within the City. The General Plan Update also functions as a plan for the management of resources and infrastructure to accommodate projected growth over a 25-year period. General Plan UUdate Elerrrerrts The General Plan Update is comprised of the following six elements: Proposed General Plan Update Elements Land Use Element Circulation Element Environmental Resources and Conservation Natural and Environmental Hazards Noise Infrastructure and Public Services PC Study Session--06/13/1.7 -2 - (17sr19 General Plan Update SS) Item 10. - 222 HB -544- The Historic and Cultural Resources, Housing, and Coastal Elements are not a part of this comprehensive General Plan Update. Below is a brief description of each element. Land Use Element The Land Use Element is a required element pursuant to state planning law and guides future development and designates appropriate locations for different land uses including open spaces, parks, residences, commercial uses, industry, schools, and other public and community-serving uses. The Land Use Element establishes standards for residential density and nonresidential building intensity for lands within the planning area. The element also establishes the City's long-teen community design and economic development goals related to beach city culture and identity, community form, neighborhoods and districts, economic trends, and job development and retention strategies. Development Capacity The Land Use Element establishes a development capacity for the City over a 25-year period (to 2040). The General Plan Update accommodates an additional 7,228 dwelling units and 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential uses over 2014 conditions. Research and Technology Land Use Desi igi ation To support economic development goals to attract new incubator and technology-oriented uses, a Research and Technology(RT) land use designation within the Northwest Industrial area and the Gothard Street corridor is proposed to accommodate these types of future uses. The Research and Technology designation would provide a flexible platform for both industrial and commercial uses that do not fit into the city's historically comi-nercial or industrial areas. Many new business types require this flexibility as they may need both commercial and industrial components to conduct business. When assessing Huntington Beach's location, employment, and land use potential, technology manufacturing and technology services industries present high potential for growth. The RT designation would provide for a wide variety of nonresidential mixed-use development and encourage both employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees. Uses may include clean and green manufacturing and industrial uses (e.g., medical devices, clean air technology), research and development uses, technology, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, limited eating and drinking establishments that have as industrial component (e.g., brewery), and similar neighborhood commercial uses. Additionally, technology firms will demand newer or refurbished multi-tenant buildings that offer modern, high speed and high bandwidth infrastructure. Therefore, the Land Use Element identifies goals and policies that will focus on developing a strong inventory of adequately improved and competitive industrial buildings within these area that provide the resources and technological capacity desired by businesses in this industry. Circulation Element The Circulation Elennent is a required element of the General Plan pursuant to state planning law and defines the transportation network and describes how people move throughout the planning area, including the streets, railways, transit routes, bicycle paths, and sidewalks. The transportation network is a major detenninant of development form and land use. Factors such as, but not limited to, traffic patterns and congestion, access to transit, and ease and safety of walking and biking may determine where people choose to live, work, and visit. The Circulation PC Study Session—06/13/17 -3 - (17sr19 General Plan Update SS) HB -545- Item 10. - 223 Element was comprehensively updated in 2013. As such, changes to the Circulation Element are minimal consisting of mostly updating figures and exhibits and addressing new components of state law. Environmental Resources and Conservation Element The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element satisfies the Open Space and Conservation Element requirements of state planning law and is a required element of the General Plan. The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element describes the conservation, development, and use of natural resources (including open space), as well as parks and recreation opportunities, in Huntington Beach. This element also addresses key issues related to environmental resources and conservation, including biological resource areas, energy and water conservation, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and coastal resources. Natural and Environmental Hazards Element The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element satisfies the Safety Element requirements of state planning law, which is a mandated component of the General Plan. The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element identifies areas prone to natural hazards and potentially hazardous conditions including ground shaking and surface rupture from earthquakes; ground failure; tsunami, seiche, and dam failure; slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides; subsidence, liquefaction, and other geologic hazards; flooding; urban fires; hazardous materials; and evacuation routes. Noise Element The Noise Element is a required General Plan element and describes the existing noise environment in Huntington Beach, identifies noise sources and problems affecting community safety and comfort, and establishes policies and programs that limit community exposure to excessive noise levels, The Noise Element sets standards for acceptable noise levels by various land uses and provides guidance for how to balance the noise created by an active and economically healthy community with the community's desire for peace and quiet. Public Services and Infrastructure Element The Public Services and Infrastructure Element is an optional element that describes the water delivery system, wastewater collection and treatment system, stormwater and urban runoff, solid waste disposal, electricity, communications, and infrastructure finance. This element also identifies plans for preparing for health and safety hazards, including police protection, fire protection, marine safety, emergency response and preparedness, and airport safety. Each element is organized into the following sections: ■ Introduction and Purpose: This section describes the purpose and scope of the element, and specifies the relationship of the element to other elements in the General Plan. ■ Plan: This section provides important background information and key trends that provide a strategic basis for city policy. Many of the elements illustrate various opportunities, constraints, classifications, policies, and standards in either graphic or tabular form. For example, the Land Use Element contains a Land Use Map and a Land Use Plan that identify and describe the locations of future uses by type, density, and intensity. ■ Issues, Goals, and Policies: This section identifies the most important community issues related to the element topic. For each issue, goals are identified to provide direction by PC Study Session—06/13/17 -4- (17sr19 General Plan Update SS) Item 10. - 224 HB -5146- stating a desired future end state. Policies are identified as guides for the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff when reviewing development proposals and making other decisions that affect future development and conservation. Policies represent. a commitment by the City to pursue a particular course of action, or to take action in the future consistent with the direction stated. in the related goal. Policies are presented as written statements, tables, diagrams, and maps. All of these components must be considered together when making planning decisions. ■ Implementation Programs: Implementation Programs describe how the City will implement identified goals and policies. Unless otherwise stated, all policies are to be implemented on an as-appropriate or as-feasible basis, considering surrounding physical and environmental context and financial resources. The implementation programs are located, in Chapter V111, Implementation of the General Plan Update. Elements Not Included in General Plan Update ■ Housing Element: The Housing Element is a required element of the General Plan and serves as a policy guide to address the housing needs of the residents of Huntington Beach. The element outlines housing needs, barriers or constraints to providing housing, and actions proposed to address these concerns over an eight-year period. The most recent Housing Element was adopted in 2013 and anticipates housing needs within Huntington Beach fiom 2013 through 2021. The Housing Element is not a part of the General Plan Update as it is on a separate schedule pursuant to state housing element law. ■ Coastal Element: The Coastal Element addresses the requirements of the California Coastal Act within the portions of Huntington Beach that are located within the Coastal Zone. Goals and policies in this element guide civic decisions regarding growth, development, enhancement, and preservation of coastal resources. This element will be updated after adoption of the General Plan Update and is subject to approval by the California Coastal Commission. ■ Historic and Cultural Resources Element: This element was recently comprehensively updated in 2015 and, as such, is not considered a part of the General Plan Update. However, upon adoption of the General Plan. Update, it will be reformatted to be consistent with the format of the General Plan Update, ❑ Background: As mentioned, the City's existing General Plan consists of 16 elements and was last comprehensively updated in 1996. In October 2013, the City Council approved a contract and budget to retain PMC, Inc., now Michael Baker International, to assist the City with the General Plan Update. in March 2015, the City Council directed staff to streamline the General Plan Update including reducing the amount of optional elements and condensing the overall General Plan to the extent feasible while still complying with state law (Attachment No. 3). In July 2016, the General Plan Update project team presented goals and policies that were reviewed by the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) and land use alternatives for several opportunity areas identified in the economic conditions and market trends report prepared for the General Plan Update to the City Council. The City Council recommended minimal land use map changes (Attachment No. 4). The land use map changes directed by the City Council are limited to properties along the Gothard corridor and within the Northwest Industrial area and reflected in the proposed Research and Technology designation on the draft General Plan Map. PC Study Session—06/13/17 -5 - (17srl9 General Plan Update SS) HB -547- Item 10. - 225 ❑ CE A: The draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which analyzes the pote-mtial environmental impacts associated with the General Plan Update, is currently available for a 45- day public review and comment period through July 7, 2017. A public comment meeting will be held on June 7, 2017, to receive comments fi-oin the public on the EIR. A Planning Commission study session on the draft ElR will be held on June 27, 2017. The draft EIR studied the following topical impact sections as required by CEQA: • Air Quality • Land Use and Plamiing • Aesthetics • Noise • Biological Resources • Population, Housing and Employment • Cultural Resources • Public Services • Geology, Soils and Mineral Resources • Recreation • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Transportation and Traffic • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Utilities and Services Systems • Hydrology and Water Quality The EIR also presents alternatives to the proposed project that could avoid or reduce the severity of impacts described in the issue areas above. Following the comment period, the City will prepare a draft final EIR, which includes responses to all comments received during the comment period that relate to the analysis in the EIR. A copy of the Draft Program EIR is available at the following locations: • City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, City Hall — 3rd floor, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, 92648; • City of Huntington Beach Clerk's Office, City Hal l—2s'd floor,2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648; • Central Library, 7111 Talbert Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647; • The project website: http://«nA,N�,.iibtlietiextwave.orp, • The City's website: hn://wv,-,Nl.huntingtonbeaclica.,gov/govenitnent/departments/planniii /g ivaior/general-plan•_ update.efin ❑ Planning Issues: The purpose of this Planning Commission study session is to present an overview of the draft General Plan Update and obtain feedback on the topics to be discussed for upcoming study sessions on the project. L1 Project Schedule: Below is a schedule of upcoming meetings related to the General Plan Update. Meeting Date Time Planning Commission Study Session (EIR) June 27, 2017 5:15 P.M. _ Planning Commission Study Session(GPU) July 11, 2017 5:15 P.M. Planning Commission Study Session(GPU) July 25, 2017 5:15 P.M. _ Planning Commission Public Hearing August 15, 2017 7:00 P.M. _ City Council Study Session (tentative) August 21, 2017 4:00 P.M. _ Planning Commission Public Hearing #2 (if August 22, 2017 7:00 P.M, needed) _ City Council Public Hearing (tentative) September 18, 2017 6:00 P.M. All meetings to be held in the City Council Chambers PC Study Session—06/13/17 -6- (17sr19 General Plan Update SS) Item 10. - 226 HB -548- ❑ Attachments: 1. Draft General Plan Update—not attached; refer to website: http://www.liuntingtonbeachea.gov/go vemiiietit/departments/plaraiingimaj or/general-p lan- update.cfin 2. Draft Environmental Impact Report—not attached; refer to website: litti)://w«�,.Iiuntingtoiibeachea.gov/government/departments/plannin,g/major/ eneral-l)lan- update.cfm 3. March 2015 City Council General Plan Update streamline action 4. July 2015 City Council policy and land use alternative direction PC Study Session.—06/.13/17 -7- (17srl9 General Plan Update SS) HB -549- Item 10. - 227 Exhibit 5 -Voice of San Diego-http://www.voiceofsandiego.org- San Diego Is Awash in Craft Beer- and Its Sticky, Smelly Byproduct Posted By Kinsee Morlan On April 28,2017 @ 7:00 am In Beer Beer Pollcy,Food.Must Reads I No Comments One of the challenges of opening up a new craft brewery is figuring out what to do with piles of gunk every new batch of beer leaves behind. Spent grain is basically the malted barley residue left behind in the brewing process.It's thick,like mushy oatmeal,and brewers produce so much of it they can't just throw It in dumpsters. "How do you get rid of your spent grains?I'm looking to unload at least a 1,000 pounds a week.Any ideas?I'm new:" Cameron Pryor,cofounder of the new California Wild Ales 0]brewery in Sorrento Valley,posted his question in a craft beer group on Facebook last month.It's a query that comes uu often 12lamong those opening new breweries across San Dlego County: Pryor did eventually hook up with a local farmer.Most San Diego breweries have ranchers Dick up their s ent grain f33 for free.They use it to feed their animals. Rawley Macias said he hadn't yet figured out what to do with his spent grain when he opened the doors to his Rouleur Brewin Cum any 141 in Carlsbad a month ago.He contacted several farmers,but he said he kept hearing that their livestock feed needs were met. We Stand Up for You.Will You Stand Up for Us? I would like to donate$15 Per Month Per Year 'One Time Donate Now What benefits do VOSD members get,?151 "The skids have been greased and breweries had been working on these relationships with farmers for a long time;'Maclas said."But for new brewers,a lot of farmers want you to be making a lot of grain.They also want you to be brewing a few times a week and stay on that scheduie so the pickups can be consistent,but it's hard as a new brewery because you don't have the demand yet:' Without finding a farmer,Macias opened his brewery.Huge barrels of spent grain started piling up.The smell of the rotting beer byproduct started becoming a pungent problem-his landlord and customers complained. "I had like 16 trash cans of spent grain in my brewery just stinking up the place;"he said. Eventually,Macias connected with a pig farmer from Valley Center.His spent grain is now picked up soon after it's produced.He said he's heard from plenty of other breweries in the region with the same spent grain problem on their hands.His next-door neighbor,in fact,Wiseg_uy Brewing Co I61.,had a backlog of spent grain until Macias hooked them up with the pig farmer. Tom Gent,who owns Wiseagy Bre+,ino Co 173.with his son,said he thinks as more breweries open in a re !on that already has about 140 Igi,it'll get harder and harder to find folks who want all the spent grain. "It's going to be a larger problem on a bigger scale as microbreweries become more and more popular,"he said. HB -551- Item 10. - 229 Photo by Kinsee Morlan Tom Gent is co-owner of Wiseguy Brewing Co. Eric Larson, executive director of the San Diego County Farm Bureau, said he's already heard from several farmers who say they turn new breweries away. He said while there are a lot of farms In the county, there aren't many farms filled with animals. "We have a relatively small amount of livestock because land is expensive here and livestock tends to be raised on inexpensive land," he said. "So we're producing a lot of beer here, but not enough animals to eat the spent grain." Item 10. - 230 xB -552- A few,small crafty San Diego companies have come up with creative things to do with spent grain.A homebrewing couple uses their spent grain to make soap[1c] David Crane makes do tq Feats fill with spent grain from local breweries.And a new startup company called Upcycle&Company.[lzi uses spent grain from Ballast Point as one of its main ingredients for fertilizer. "We just launched but we are already scaling up;"said Upcycie's director of operations James Griffin."So we are working with multiple breweries,but we're still In negotiation stages." Councilman Chris Cate,whose district is home to most of the city of San Diego's breweries 1131,has his eye on the spent grain problem.He said his office has been working on coming up with a more comprehensive solution,at least for breweries within city limits. Cate said his office is partnering with the Center for Sustainable Energy and UC San Diego.The coalition is working to secure grant funding and eventually build an anaerobic digester[141 at the UCSD campus that could turn the spent grain from city breweries Into renewable energy.Essentially,waste creates methane gas,and that gas can be used to power Rs]the very same breweries that supplied the spent grain. "We'll be powering beer with beer,"Cate said. He said his office has heard from breweries having a hard time figuring out what to do with spent grain,but there's another issue-too many breweries are relying on far-away farmers,even some outside the county,to pick up the beer waste.Those long-distance trips don't align well with the carbon-cutting-goals in the City's Climate Action Plan(16] Cate's office has given a few presentations to the San Diego Brewers Guild to let local brewers know about the future plans for spent grain,and to talk about other sustainable practices,like onsite composting,that breweries can do with the waste. He said they're also getting ready to survey San Diego brewers to get a better Idea of the amount or spent grain being produced. "We want to come up with a creative solution to address the Climate Action Plan and address the problem our brewers are having when it comes to offloading spent grain,"Cate said. Article printed From Voice of San Diego: http://www.voiceofsandiego,org URL to article:http://www.voiceafsandiego.org/topics/food/san-diegos-craft-beer-obsession-gross-side-effect-thats-getting-harder-contain/ URLs in this post: [13 California Wild Ales:http://www.californiawildales.com/ [2)comes up often :https://www.reddit.com/r/farming/comments/2zgdkr/local_brewery_looking_for—local_san_diego_farm_to/ (3]ranchers pick up their spent grain:http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/topics/food/why-local-brewers-and-farmers-hope-the-fda-wont-go-against- the-grain/ [4]Rouleur Brewing Company: http://rouleurbrewing.com/ [5]What benefits do VOSD members get?:http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/about-us/members/membership-levels/ [6]Wiseguy Brewing Co: https://www.facebook.com/wiseguybrewingco/ [7]Wiseguy Brewing Co: http://wiseguybrewing.com/ [6]a region that already has about 140: https://www.sandiego.org/articies/breweries/san-diego-breweries.aspx [9]Image:http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/spentgrain_tom-el493329799661.jpg [10]spent grain to make soap: http://www.beercansoap.com/journey [11]makes dog treats: http://doggiebeerbones.com/ [12]Upcyde&Company: https://www.upcycleandcompany.com/ [13]home to most of the city of San Diego's breweries:http://www.voiceofsandlego.org/topics/arts/culture-report-chris-cates-expanding-beer-beit/ (14]anaerobic digester:https://www.americanbiogascouncii.org/biogas_what.asp [15]gas can be used to power:http://www.sandlegouniontribune.com/military/sdut-electric-independence-2012ju1O2-story.html [16]carbon-cutting goals in the city's Climate Action Plan:http://www.voiceofsandlego.org/category/climate-action-plan/ Copyright O 2015 Voice of San Diego.All rights reserved. Ha -553- Item 10. - 231 Exhibit 6 A laboratory assessment of the impact of brewery wastewater discharge on sulfide and methane production in a sewer. Sudarianto G', Sharma KR, Gutierrez O,Yuan Z. Author information Abstract The impact of brewery wastewater discharge on sulfide and methane production in a sewer was assessed. Experiments were carried out on laboratory scale sewer reactors consisting of both an experimental and a control reactor. The control reactor was intermittently fed with real fresh sewage while the experimental reactor was fed with a mixture of brewery and domestic wastewater at two different proportions (10 and 25% v/v). 10% v/v discharge of brewery wastewater increased the H2S and CH4 production rates in the sewer reactor by 40% and 30%, respectively. When the brewery wastewater fraction was increased to 25% v/v, the H2S production rate of the experimental reactor decreased to the level of the control reactor. In contrast, the CH4 production rate maintained at a level that was 30% higher than that in the control reactor. These results indicate that the discharge of brewery wastewater into sewers can give negative impacts in relation to odour and corrosion management of the systems and will increase the greenhouse gas emissions from sewers. The study also reveals that the impact of trade waste on the biological reactions in sewers is complex, and requires careful experimental assessment in each case. HB -555- Item 10. - 233 Exhibit 7 (J P P i o I<= 1 C. N F F ZONING CODE Title 20 ZONING CODE—GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 204.USE CLASSIFICATIONS 204.12 Industrial Use Classifications A. Industry, Custom. Establishments primarily engaged in on-site production of goods by hand manufacturing involving the use of hand tools and small-scale equipment. Small-Scale. Includes mechanical equipment not exceeding two horsepower or a single kiln not exceeding eight kilowatts and the incidental direct sale to consumers of only those goods produced on-site. Typical uses include ceramic studios, candle-making shops, and custom jewelry manufacture. B. Industry, General. Manufacturing of products, primarily from extracted or raw materials, or bulk storage and handling of such products and materials. Uses in this classification typically involve a high incidence of truck or rail traffic, and/or outdoor storage of products, materials, equipment, or bulk fuel. This classification includes chemical manufacture or processing, food processing and packaging, laundry and dry cleaning plants, auto dismantling within an enclosed building, stonework and concrete products manufacture (excluding concrete ready-mix plants), small animal production and processing within an enclosed building, and power generation. C. Industry,Limited. Manufacturing of finished parts or products, primarily fi-orri previously prepared materials; and provision of industrial services, both within an enclosed building. This classification in- cludes processing, fabrication, assembly, treatment, and packaging, but excludes basic industrial processing from raw materials and Vehicle/Equipment Services, but does allow food processing for human consumption. D. Industry, Research and Development. Establishments primarily engaged in the research, development, and controlled production of high-technology electronic, industrial or scientific products or commodities for sale, but prohibits uses that may be objectionable in the opinion of the director, by reason of production of offensive odor, dust, noise, vibration, or in the opinion of the Fire Chief by reason of storage of hazardous materials. Uses include aerospace and biotechnology films, and non-toxic computer component manufacturers. 1. This classification also includes assembly, testing and repair of components, devices, equipment, systems,parts and components such as but not limited to the following: coils, tubes, semi-conductors; communication, navigation, guidance and control equipment; data processing equipment; filing and labeling machinery; glass edging and silvering equipment; graphics and art equipment; metering equipment; optical devices and equipment; photographic equipment; radar, infrared and ultraviolet equipment; radio and television equipment. 2. This classification also includes the manufacture of components, devices, equipment, parts and systems which includes assembly, fabricating, plating and processing, testing and repair, such as but not limited to the following: machine and metal fabricating shops, model and spray painting shops, environmental test, including vibration analysis, cryogenics, and related functions, plating and processing shops, nuclear and radioisotope. 3. This classification also includes research and development laboratories including biochemical and chemical development -facilities for national welfare on land, sea, or air; and facilities for film and photography, metallurgy; pharmaceutical, and medical and x-ray research. E. Wholesaling, Distribution and Storage. Storage and distribution facilities without sales to the public on-site or direct public access except for recycling facilities and public storage in a small individual space exclusively and directly accessible to a specific tenant. This classification includes mini-warehouses. (3334- 6/97) HB -557- Item 10. - 235 View the inobile version. Item 10. - 236 HB -558- Exhibit 8 HB -559- Item 10. - 237 Guidance Document CHAPTER 2 AIR QUALITY ISSUES REGARDING LAND USE • LOCAL GOVERNMENT SITING CRITERIA FOR SENSITIVE RECEPTORS • JOB-HOUSING BALANCE • SUGGESTED GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES/STRATEGIES RELATED TO LAND USE Item 1.0. - 238 HB _560_ Guidance Document AIR QUALITY ISSUES REGARDING LAND USE Local government land use authority in planning, zoning, and permitting can be a very effective tool to minimize air pollutant emissions and associated health risks. However, it is important to recognize that traditional assumptions about planning and zoning compatibility to protect the public may not always eliminate adverse health impacts of air pollution. While it is recognized that local governments, to make the best decisions for the benefit of their residents, must weigh and balance multiple issues, demands and concerns, including, but not limited to, the need for housing, existing development and development patterns, environmental responsibilities and more when making land use decisions, some projects being considered by local land use decision-makers may comply with zoning and air pollution control requirements but still result in adverse health impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. These health impacts may result from emissions released at a single site, along a transportation corridor or a combination of co-located air pollution sources in a community. For example, the co-location of residential and commercial zones often minimize transportation-related emissions, but in some situations this mixed land use may also increase health risks if commercial facilities that emit toxic chemicals are over concentrated. While mixed-use zoning offers economic, social, and environmental benefits compared to single-use zoning, this chapter describes certain industrial, commercial and transportation uses that may pose health concerns with residences, schools, and other sensitive sites. This document introduces land use related policies that rely on design and distance parameters to minimize emissions and lower potential health risk. LOCAL GOVERNMENT SITING CONSIDERATIONS FOR SENSITIVE RECEPTORS There is a strong connection between health risk and the proximity of the source of air pollution. Local jurisdictions have the responsibility for determining land use compatibility for sensitive receptors. A sensitive receptor is a person in the population who is particularly susceptible to health effects due to exposure to an air contaminant. The following are land uses (sensitive sites) where sensitive receptors are typically located: • schools, playgrounds and childcare centers • long-term health care facilities • rehabilitation centers • convalescent centers • hospitals • retirement homes • residences Facilities and Operations That Emit Odors and Dust Both the AQMD and local governments receive complaints about dust and offensive odors. Odors and dust are air pollutants that can have negative health impacts. While 2-1 HB -561- Item 10. - 239 Guidance Document almost any source may emit objectionable odors, some land uses will be more likely to produce odors or dust because of their operation. The types of facilities or operations that are prone to generate odors, and dust, and other air pollutants can be identified from complaints received by the AQMD (Table 2-1). While AQMD records indicate these facilities have the potential to emit odor or dust that may impact sensitive receptors, individual equipment and operations within each source category do not necessarily generate dust or odor. Special care needs to be given to the initial siting and design of operations and facilities listed in Table 2-1. Assessing potential impacts depends on a number of variables such as wind speed and direction, design features of the proposed facility such as stack height, and the physical distance from the source and the sensitive receptors. Local governments should identify both new projects that have a probability of pollution-related complaints and new developments that may be affected by existing upwind sources. Ideally, potential odor and dust emissions from new projects should be identified and evaluated while the project is still in its initial design phase. This early effort could provide an opportunity to change the project design to minimize or eliminate emissions before the facility becomes operational. Potential odor and dust sources that can be identified and mitigated before construction of a project begins will minimize health impacts and enforcement problems. Local governments are advised to contact the AQMD's Office of Engineering and Compliance to determine if complaints have been filed by property owners or occupants in the general vicinity of a proposed project site to help evaluate the potential for dust or odor complaints. Table 2-1 Sources of Odor and Dust Complaints Received by the AQMD Sources of Odors ` Sources of Dust Agriculture (farming and livestock) Agricultural (Land Tilling) Chemical Plants Asphalt and Cement Plants Composting Operations Auto Body Facilities Dairies Construction Activities Fiberglass Molding Diesel EnginesNehicles Landfills Composting Operations Refineries Fertilizer Operations Rendering Plants Fiberglass Molding Rail Yards Furniture Manufacturing - Sawdust Wastewater Treatment Plant Landfills and Transfer Stations Refineries Roofing Operations Rubber Manufacturing Sand and Gravel Operations Sandblasting Silk Screening Wood dust 2-2 Item 10. - 240 HB -562- Guidance Document Toxic Air Contaminants Sensitive receptors (and the facilities that house them) in proximity to sources of air pollutants that emit TACs are of particular concern. Exposure to TACs can increase the risk of contracting cancer or result in adverse non-cancer health effects. Non-cancer health risks associated with TAC exposure include birth defects and other reproductive damage, neurological disorders, and damage to the respiratory system. A comprehensive monitoring study of TACs was initiated as part of AQMD's environmental justice program. The Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES-Il) included fixed sites characterizing neighborhood-scale conditions and a complementary microscale study to sample potential localized influences of toxic-emitting sources near residential neighborhoods. Inventories of TACs were utilized in computer simulation models to depict toxic risks for the entire South Coast basin. The MATES-II project represents one of the most comprehensive air toxics monitoring programs ever conducted in a major urban area in the country, and it has been recognized as a model program. Findings from the study revealed the following: • Average cancer risk from ambient measurements in the South Coast basin was found to be 1400 in a million; • Diesel exhaust is responsible for about 70 percent of the total cancer risk from air pollution; • Emissions from mobile sources -- including cars and trucks as well as ships, trains and planes -- account for about 90 percent of the cancer risk. Emissions from businesses and industry are responsible for the remaining 10 percent; and • The highest cancer risk occurs in south Los Angeles county -- including the port area -- and along major freeways. In 2005, the AQMD plans to release the results of another intensive one-year study that examined current levels of cancer-causing TACs and the risk they pose to district residents. This study will help gauge the effectiveness of current regulations and serve as a vital tool in helping shape future air quality and environmental justice policies. MATES-Ill will monitor 21 TACs and four other substances at 10 sites across the Los Angeles basin. The AQMD will use mobile monitoring stations to sample at neighborhood sites near toxic emission sources or in areas where community members are concerned about health risks from air pollution. Such neighborhood sites could be near airports, rail yards, warehouses, landfills, high-volume vehicle traffic, or multiple commercial or industrial facilities. Sampling at each neighborhood site lasts for up to two months. The goal of MATES-ill is to update TAC levels and toxic emission inventories, determine the cancer and non-cancer health risk from air toxics across the district. Also, the study will investigate potential toxic "hot spots" in local communities. The potential impacts of new facilities on sensitive sites will depend on a variety of factors including the amount and toxicity of pollutants emitted, the type of air pollution control equipment at the facility, design features of the facility, the distance from the 2-3 HB -5631- Item 10. - 241 Guidance Document source of emissions to the sensitive receptor, and local meteorology. All these factors should be carefully evaluated when siting a source of air pollution. Typically, the siting process followed by land use agencies to avoid the location of sensitive sites (e.g., residences, health clinics, etc.) near sources of air pollution does not involve the AQMD. The potential for public health impacts remains unchanged when siting sensitive receptors near a pollution source or a pollution source near a sensitive receptor. Therefore, local policies should allow for a thorough evaluation of the air quality impacts for both scenarios. Where possible, CARB recommends a minimum separation between new sensitive land uses and the following eight categories of existing sources (Table 1-1 in CARB's Proposed Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. March 2005, or subsequent versions adopted by CARB): • high-traffic freeways and roads • distribution centers • rail yards • ports • refineries • chrome plating facilities • perchloroethylene dry cleaners • large gasoline stations It is recommended that the AQMD be consulted to obtain facility-specific emissions information and accepted assessment methods for determining relative exposure and health risk for proposed projects. Recent studies have found an increased incidence of adverse effects among those who live near busy roadways; these include increased respiratory disease and increased mortality (Wilhelm, M., et al 2003; Kim, J. et al 2004). These studies found that residential proximity to traffic was associated with increased risk of low birth weight, increased medical visits for asthma and increased respiratory symptoms in children. Studies conducted near freeways in Southern California show that traffic emissions, such as carbon monoxide, ultra-fine particulates, and black carbon (soot) are several times higher next to freeways than the background concentrations. These concentrations fell to lower levels with increasing distance from the roadway, decreasing about 60-80 percent within 100 meters (Zhu, Yifang, et al, 2002). Recent results from the Children's Health Study have shown strong evidence of adverse effects in children exposed to ambient levels of traffic-related pollutants. This study followed children in 12 communities in Southern California from 4th grade through 12th grade (McConnell, K., et al, 2002). Children in communities with high levels of NOx, PM2_5, acid vapors, and elemental carbon showed reduced lung function growth over the study period. Additionally, a higher level of asthma was found in the children that lived nearest to busy roadways. In a report prepared for CARB, researchers concluded that the current levels of ambient air pollution in Southern California are associated with 2-4 Item 10. - 242 HB -564- Guidance Document clinically important chronic health effects that have substantial health and economic impacts (Peters, 2004). The primary authority for siting public schools rests with local school districts which are the designated "lead agencies" for the CEQA environmental analyses. The California Education Code requires public school districts to notify the local planning agency when siting new public schools and the planning agency to determine if the proposed site conforms with the General Plan. If the proposed school is within 500 feet of the edge of a freeway or traffic corridor that has specified minimum average daily traffic counts, the school district is required to determine through specified risk assessment and air dispersion modeling that neither short-term nor long-term exposure poses significant heath risks to pupils. Both the California Education Code section 17213 and the California Public Resources Code section 21151.8 require school districts to consult with the AQMD when preparing the environmental assessment. The AQMD verifies all permitted and non-permitted sources of air pollution that might significantly affect health have been identified and evaluated. Generally, cancer risk will drop off with distance from a ground level pollution source, such as a freeway. Freeways and busy traffic corridors are defined as traffic volume of over 100,000 vehicles per day in urban areas and 50,000 vehicles per day in rural areas (Education Code Section 17312). CARB studies show that air pollution levels can be significantly higher within 500 feet (150 meters) of freeways or busy traffic corridors and then diminish rapidly. Actual concentration of diesel particulate matter will vary at a particular location depending on traffic volume, vehicle mix, prevailing winds and other variables. The decline in the relative concentration of diesel particulate matter as one moves away from the edge of a freeway is illustrated Figure 2-1. These data have been normalized to a receptor located 20 meters from the edge of freeway (i.e., at a distance of 20 m, the receptor is exposed to 100 percent of the diesel particulate matter emissions from the freeway). A downwind distance of 328 feet (100 m) will reduce cancer risk by over 60 percent. If the physical downwind distance is increased to 984 feet (300 m), the relative concentration is reduced over 80 percent. 2-5 xB -565- Item 10. - 243 Guidance Document 1 0.8 0 r L 5 0.s 0 U 0.4 c� 0.2 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Distance from Edge of Freeway(m) Figure 2-1 Relative Concentration of Diesel Particulate Matter in Relation to the Distance from The Edge of a Freeway Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District. Adapted from the California Air Resources Board's Diesel Risk Reduction Plan. A comparison of total cancer risk and cancer risk from diesel particulate matter emissions in rural and urban areas shows that cancer risk associated with elevated levels of diesel particulate both decrease rapidly within the first 100 — 150 meters from the edge of a roadway (Table 2-2). Estimated cancer risk from diesel particulate matter along rural and urban roadways is decreased approximately 68 percent at a distance 150 m (492 ft) from the edge of the roadway. Clearly, these data demonstrate that a minimum distance that separates sources of diesel emissions from nearby receptors is effective in reducing potential cancer risk. The AQMD recognizes that physical separation of the receptors from the pollution sources is not always reasonable or feasible particularly in mature communities. For example, in southern Los Angeles county a sequence of land use decisions in urban areas allowed freeway construction through existing neighborhoods. 2-F Item 10. - 244 HB _566- Guidance Document Table 2-2 Cancer Risks from Diesel Particulate Matter at the Edge of Roadways in Rural and Urban Areas Distance from Edge of Diesel f.ga Jpulate Matter Total Cancer Rfsk Roadway Cancer.Risk in ane:million . in one million (meters) Rural.:; Urban Rural* Urban* 20 m 475 890 589 1104 150 m 151 277 187 343 500 m 86 159 107 197 Source:South Coast Air Quality Management District. Adapted from the California Air Resources Board's Diesel Risk Reduction Plan. 'To account for gasoline vehicle emissions, the diesel PM risk was multiplied by 1.24. This represents the relative risk contribution from benzene, 1, 3 butadiene, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde on a basin-wide basis. It is assumed that the vast majority of benzene, 1,3 butadiene,formaldehyde,and acetaldehyde emissions come from on-road gasoline vehicles. The AQMD provides guidance for analyzing cancer risks from diesel particulate matter from mobile sources at facilities such as truck stops and warehouse distribution centers in the document titled Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis. This document may be downloaded at http://www.agmd.gov/cega/hdbk.htmi. This guidance describes analysis of potential cancer risks associated with diesel particulates from truck idling and movement (such as truck stops, warehouse and distribution centers, or transit centers), ship hoteliing at ports, and train idling. It is suggested that projects with diesel-powered mobile sources use this health risk guidance document to quantify potential cancer risks from the diesel particulate emissions. Projects that incorporate transit nodes may include a range of multiple services ranging from a bus or light rail stop to a combination of services that may include bus, shuttles, light and heavy rail systems. The concept of a "clean" transit node refers to transit services that predominately operate with zero emission vehicles (e.g., electric light rail), clean fuel vehicles (e.g., compressed natural gas or hydrogen), or vehicles powered with low-emission engines (e.g., California certified Super Ultra Low Emissions Vehicles). Projects that emphasize "clean" transit nodes not only minimize VMT, but also reduce the potential health impacts associated with transit-related emissions on individuals living near transit services. Current USEPA regulations establish fuel registration and formulation requirements. All diesel fuels and all additives for on-road motor vehicles are required to be registered with the USEPA, and all new diesel-fueled on-road and off-road engines and vehicles sold in California are required to meet both federal and state emission certification requirements. In addition, the Carl Moyer Program, administered by CARB and local air 2-7 j-[g -567- Item 10. - 245 Guidance Document districts, is a clean engine incentive program that incentivizes projects that substantially reduce emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and fine particulate matter (PM) from heavy-duty diesel engines. Funds are distributed to project proponents through the AQMD to incentivize cost-effective projects. Funds, in the form of grants for private companies, public agencies, or individuals operating heavy-duty diesel engines, cover an incremental portion of the cost of cleaner on-road, off-road, marine, locomotive, and agricultural irrigation pump engines. This framework is also used to award grants for other equipment and for retrofitting or repowering existing engines. The CARB Diesel Risk Reduction Plan proposes a three-pronged approach that would require use of low-sulfur diesel fuel; retrofitting existing engines with PM filters; and nearly a 90 percent reduction of PM emissions from all new diesel engines and vehicles. A number of adopted and proposed state regulations that will reduce diesel emissions target the following source categories: Heavy-Duty Public Fleets and Private Utilities; Cargo Handling Equipment; Non-Urban Transit Buses; Harbor Craft; Truck Idling from Sleeper Cabs; Off Road and Private On-Road Fleets; Agriculture Equipment; and Ships. Further, the AQMD has adopted fleet rules that will gradually shift public agencies to lower emissions and alternative fuel vehicles whenever a fleet operator with 15 or more vehicles replaces or purchases new vehicles. Rule 1186.1 Less — polluting sweepers Rule 1191 Clean On-Road Light and Medium-Duty Public Fleet Vehicle Rule 1192 Clean On-Road Transit Buses Rule 1193 Clean On-Road Residential and Commercial Refuse Collection Vehicles Rule 1194 Commercial Airport Ground Access Vehicles Rule 1195 Clean On-Road School Buses Rule 1196 Clean On-Road Heavy-duty Public Fleet Vehicles Air regulatory agencies have collaborated closely with regulated industries, refineries and diesel vehicle manufacturers to establish cleaner fuel specifications and engine technologies. Although AQMD's fleet rules have been challenged, CARB is moving forward with its rulemaking to facilitate the implementation of fleet rules in the South Coast Air Basin that will result in significant emission reductions. In addition, state and federal requirements are the cornerstone of the clean air strategy to clean up diesel pollution in the South Coast district. Combined, the current and planned regulatory efforts by USEPA, CARB and AQMD are expected to substantially lower the average level of diesel emissions per vehicle. CARB or AQMD staff can be contacted to obtain additional information on the current status of rule development. The goals established by the CARB plan call for a statewide reduction in diesel particulate emissions of 75 percent by 2010 and 85 percent by 2020, AQMD' s 2004 addendum to the 2000 Air Toxics Control Plan indicates that full implementation of the 2003 AQMP, including CARB's measures to reduce diesel particulate matter, would reduce basin-wide toxic-weighted emissions by 50 percent. While there continues to be 2-8 Item 10. - 246 HB -568- Guidance Document an overall reduction in air pollution for the region, the emission reductions expected from cleaner engine standards that employ new control technologies often require a lengthy "fleet turnover" time to be effective. Given projections for future growth and additional vehicles that will utilize the regions transportation corridors, there are no guarantees that localized cancer risk and non-cancer impacts will diminish rapidly in the short term or adequately in the long run. Cities are encouraged to join the AQMD in a proactive approach to address existing health concerns in their communities identified in the AQMD's Multiple Air Toxics Emissions Study (MATES Il). Policies and strategies suggested in this guidance document can offer a near-term remedy to lower cancer risk from exposure to air pollution, and at the same time, provide preventive measures that protect health over the long-term planning horizon of the general plan. TACs from stationary sources are of particular concern with regard to sensitive receptors. For example, state law requires school districts to consider the impact of siting a new school close to existing facilities that emit TACs. This same principle should be applied in siting other sensitive sites such as retirement homes and hospitals. AQMD serves as a clearinghouse for publicly available information on stationary sources that emit TACs and associated public health risks. This information is compiled from documentation required of facilities that emit TACs by AQMD Rules 1401 & 1402, and Assembly Bill (AB) 2588 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program (H&SC §§ 39660 et seq.). Toxic risk assessments are routinely included in CEQA evaluations performed by the local governments in its land use decisions Jurisdictions may conduct a current inventory of all major sources of air pollution within a specified radius of the proposed sensitive site. Examples of facilities with the potential to emit TACs that could pose a health risk are shown in Table 2-3, Also, AQMD staff are available to assist local governments in identifying sources of TACs within their jurisdictions and evaluating potential health risk from TAC exposure. Local governments may contact the AQMD to obtain recommended analytical methods. Existing land use conflicts are best addressed on an individual basis. AQMD is available to assist cities and counties in evaluating local government options and strategies for minimizing existing pollution exposure problems. Options may include relocation, recycling, redevelopment, rezoning, process changes, incentive programs, and other types of measures. 2-9 HB -569- Item 10. - 247 Guidance Document Table 2-3 Examples of Facilities That Emit Toxic Air Contaminants Categories Facility Type Air Pollutants of Concern Commercial Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners' Perchloroethylene Chrome Platers/Chrome Spraying Operations Hexavalent Chromium Gas Stations Benzene Auto Body Shops Metals, Solvents Furniture Repair Solvents2,Methylene Chloride Film Processing Services Solvents, Perchloroethylene Cold Storage Distribution Centers,Warehouses Diesel Particulate Matter Printing Shops Solvents Diesel Engines Diesel Particulate Matter Industrial Manufacturers Solvents, Metals Metal Platers, Welders, Metal Spray(flame Hexavalent Chromium, Nickel, Metals spray)Operations Chemical Producers Solvents, Metals Gasoline Refineries Benzene, Solvents, Metals, PAHs Furniture Manufacturers Solvents Shipbuilding and Repair Hexavalent Chromium and other metals, Solvents Hazardous Waste Incinerators Dioxin, Solvents, Metals Power Plants Benzene, Formaldehyde, Particulate Matter Research and Development Facilities Solvents, Metals, etc. Freight Distribution Centers Diesel Particulate Matter Public Landfills Benzene,Vinyl Chloride, Diesel Particulate Matter Waste Water Treatment Plants Hydrogen Sulfide Medical Waste Incinerators Dioxin, Benzene, PAH, PCBs, 1,3-Butadiene Recycling,Garbage Transfer Stations Diesel Particulate Matter Municipal Incinerators Dioxin, Benzene, PAH, PCBs, 1,3-Butadiene Transportation Port Facilities Diesel Particulate Matter, Methyl Bromide Airports Benzene, Formaldehyde Rail Yards(diesel locomotives) Diesel Particulate Matter Rail Corridors Diesel Particulate Matter Intermodal Facilities Diesel Particulate Matter Truck Stops Diesel Particulate Matter Freeways and Roadways Diesel Particulate Matter, Benzene, 1,3-Butadiene, Formaldehyde Agricultural Operations Farming Operations Diesel Particulate Matter,VOCs, NOx, PM,o, CO, SOx, Pesticides Livestock and Dairy O erations Ammonia,VOCs, PM,o Source:Adapted from the Proposed Air Quality and Land Use Handbook:A Community Health Perspective. CARB,March 2005. 'Non-pert alternatives(e.g.wet cleaning and CO2 cleaning)may eliminate TAC emissions. 2Many,but not all solvents contain TACs. 2-10 Item 10. - 248 HB -570- Guidance Document Mapping Sources of Toxic Air Contaminants. Land use/zoning maps should be utilized to identify the location of facilities and transit corridors that are potential sources of TACs and the locations of sensitive receptors. An internet-based mapping tool is available from CARB that allows local planners to view maps showing the locations of air pollution sources. The Community Health Air Pollution Information System (CHAPIS) was developed by ARB and the State's 35 local air districts. The AQMD provides the data for facilities in its jurisdiction, Facilities that emit 10 or more tons per year of nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, PM10, or reactive organic gases are included in the database. AQMD facilities that emit TACs are being phased in by categories. The CHAPIS database includes chemical manufacturing, metal fabrication, and aerospace/electronics manufacturing facilities if they have conducted health risk assessments under California's Air Toxics "Hot Spots" program. The remaining "Hot Spot" facilities and other industries and smaller businesses, such as gas stations and dry cleaners will eventually be added. An example of a CHAPIS map for the Central Los Angeles - Port region is shown in Figure 2-2. j comp(on f F, i ): y g n A s A i9 i A Ay i ` t ` ig 1 1 Jf 22 J i Long.Beach — 223 } l f 1 r 17 rylit — 0 2.1m1 A> ;4 l y � Lf ,/J Seal Beach Figure 2-2 Example of a CHAPIS Map of Central Los Angeles Port Regions CHAPIS maps may answer questions such as: • What are the major sources of air pollution within several miles from a residence? • What are the relative contributions of mobile and stationary source emissions? • What are major sources of air pollution near schools? • What air pollutants are emitted by a particular facility or from mobile sources? 7-1 1 HB -571- Item 10. - 249 1 L U -,'t,- i+v a i i v. ✓te r Guidance Document While the CHARS information can serve as an indicator of local levels of air pollution, it is the exposure to emissions that influences health effects. Exposure is the amount of pollution that someone actually breathes or otherwise ingests. The degree of exposure varies with the distance from the source and the activities of the individual. Exposure is also dependent on how the emissions are released and dispersed into the atmosphere. Exposure to air pollutants can also occur from indoor sources such as cooking, cleaning, and smoking. Health risk, as it is related to exposure to air contaminants is influenced by the number of air pollutants an individual is exposed to and the relative toxicity of those pollutants. The air pollutant emission information contained in CHARS is provided for general informational purposes. This mapping tool does not address the contribution of indoor sources of air pollution, and it does not show exposure levels or the health risks associated with the pollutants and sources it tracks. Not all stationary source facilities that are required to be permitted by the AQMD can be identified by CHARS at this time. Also, there can be a lag time between when the emissions occurred and the reporting of the information to the AQMD or CARB emission inventory databases. The AQMD should be consulted for the most recent emissions data and for information on facilities that may not appear on CHAPIS maps. Siting issues, with respect to sensitive receptors need to be identified early in the review process, preferably before projects are formally submitted to the public agencies' planning boards. The following three air quality questions related to land use compatibility should be considered for each project in close proximity to sensitive receptors: • Will a sensitive receptor be located downwind from an existing source of dust or odors (Table 2-1)? • Will a sensitive receptor be located in close proximity to a congested roadway or an existing facility that emits TACs (Table 2-3)? • is adequate separation provided, or are there established siting criteria to minimize exposure and health risk between sensitive receptors and sources of air pollution (see Table 1-1 in CARB's Draft Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. February 2005)? Cities and counties could establish policies that provide for the location of sensitive sites and sources of air pollution in a manner that seeks to avoid the over-concentration of these facilities near sensitive sites. A number of strategies that may be employed to address over-concentration of emission sources and the cumulative impacts of the combined emissions include: • physical separation between the source and the sensitive site • design features at the source to minimize air pollution emissions • siting, permitting and zoning policies • capping cumulative impacts of various pollution sources 2-12 Item 10. - 250 HB _572_ Guidance Document • changing the land use designations in areas where there are significant cumulative impacts "Cumulative" air quality analyses describe health and nuisance impacts related to cumulative emissions from sources that individually comply with AQMD, state, and federal rules. For example, in local jurisdictions where there are neighborhoods near a relatively large number of industrial facilities or near heavy cross-town traffic, there is concern that there may be accumulated effects of numerous emission sources operating near residences, schools, or other sensitive sites. Cumulative impacts may be mitigated through siting and zoning policies that consider, where feasible, appropriate setbacks and buffer zones to disperse the air pollutants before they reach sensitive receptors. When physical separation of sensitive receptors from sources of air pollution is not a feasible option, particularly in older well-developed communities, the design features of a specific facility or project (e.g., barriers and walls, landscaping, stack height, and ventilation systems) should be evaluated as an alternative to physical land separation. JOB-HOUSING BALANCE Residents in urban areas in the South Coast basin have become increasingly concerned with increased traffic congestion and the failure of the region to achieve state and federal clean air standards. The concept of a "jobs/housing balance" is based on the premise that the number of vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) can be reduced when sufficient jobs are available locally to balance the employment demands of the community, and when commercial services are convenient to residential areas. Achieving a good balance requires planning the location and nature of jobs and housing in order to encourage a reduction in vehicle trips and VMT while increasing mass transit ridership and alternative modes of transportation, such as bicycles and walking. The AQMD and the SCAG both embrace jobs/housing balance as a viable tool available to local governments to reduce air pollution. SUGGESTED GOAL, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIESISTRATEGIES RELATED TO LAND USE Goal 1 Land use policies that address the relationship between land use and air quality to protect public health and minimize impacts on existing land use patterns and future land use development Objective 1.1 Through land use plans provide heightened consideration of policies and strategies to minimize exposure of sensitive receptors and sites (e.g., schools, hospitals, and residences) to health risks related to air pollution. 2-13 HB -573_ Item 10. - 251 Guidance Document Suggested Policies/Strategies to Protect Sensitive Receptors from Health Risks Related to Air Pollution: AQ 1.1.1 Develop mapping and inventory resources to identify sensitive receptors and sources of air pollution. AQ 1.1.2 Consider environmental justice issues as they are related to potential health impacts associated with air pollution and ensure that all land use decisions, including enforcement actions, are made in an equitable fashion to protect residents, regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location from the health effects of air pollution. AQ 1.1.3 Encourage site plan designs to provide the appropriate set-backs and/or design features that reduce TAC at the source. AQ 1.1.4 Encourage the applicants for sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, daycare centers, playgrounds and medical facilities) to incorporate design features (e.g., pollution prevention, pollution reduction, barriers, landscaping, ventilation systems, or other measures) in the planning process to minimize the potential impacts of air pollution on sensitive receptors. AQ 1.1.5 Promote and support mixed-use land patterns that allow the integration of retail, office, institutional and residential uses. Consult with the AQMD when siting new facilities with dust, odors or TAC emissions to avoid siting those facilities near sensitive receptors and avoid siting sensitive receptors near sources of air pollution. AQ 1.1.6 Consider cumulative air quality impacts from both existing and new projects when making siting decisions. AQ 1.1.7 Facilitate communication among residents, businesses and the AQMD to quickly resolve air pollution nuisance complaints. Distribute information to advise residents on how to register a complaint with AQMD (AQMD's "Cut Smog" program). AQ 1.1.8 The owners of new developments that have the potential to emit air pollutants that would impact sensitive receptors are required, during the early stages of the business license, development or conditional use permit processes, to notify residents and businesses adjacent to the proposed site prior to starting construction. However, potential business and resident occupants newly locating near sites that may impact sensitive receptors should be encouraged to inquire through their local government or the AQMD about the air quality emissions from such sites. AQ 1.1.9 Consider all feasible alternatives to minimize emissions from diesel equipment (e.g., trucks, construction equipment, and generators).* AQ 1.1.10 Actively participate in decisions on the siting or expansion of facilities or land uses (e.g. freeway expansions), to ensure the inclusion of air quality 2-14 Item 10. - 252 HB -574- Guidance Document mitigation measures. AQ 1.1.11 Where decisions on land use may result in emissions of air contaminants that pose significant health risks, consider options, including possible relocation, recycling, redevelopment, rezoning, process changes, incentive programs, and other types of measures. Objective 1.2 Reduce mobile source emissions by reducing vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled associated with land use patterns. Suggested Policies/Strategies to reduce vehicle miles traveled: AQ 1.2.1 For planned high density and mixed use developments, project proponents should consult with the local transit agency and incorporate all appropriate and feasible transit amenities into the plans. AQ 1.2.2 Establish a Mixed-Use Zoning District that offers incentives to mixed use developments. AQ 1.2.3 Encourage through the land use entitlement process or business regulation, design of commercial and residential areas to foster pedestrian circulation. AQ 1.2.4 Adopt and implement zoning codes that encourage community centers, telecommuting programs, and home-based businesses.* AQ 1.2.5 Create opportunities to receive State transportation funds by adopting incentives (e.g., an expedited review process) for planning and implementing infill development projects within urbanized areas that include job centers and clean transportation nodes (e.g., preparation of "transit village" plans). AQ 1.2.6 Collaborate with local, regional, state and federal agencies to create incentives for "job/housing opportunity zones," to promote housing in job- rich areas and jobs in housing-rich areas. AQ 1.2.7 Design safe and efficient vehicle access to commercial land uses from arterial streets to ensure efficient vehicular ingress and egress. AQ 1.2.8 Locate public facilities and services so that they further enhance job creation opportunities. AQ 1.2.9 Ensure that development projects and zoning codes create the maximum opportunity for the use of bicycles as an alternative work transportation mode.* AQ 1.2.10 Encourage "walkable neighborhoods" by siting parks and community centers near residential areas.* 2-15 x -575- Item 10. - 253 Guidance Document Objective 1.3 Reduce mobile source emissions by increasing population densities within one-half mile of clean transit nodes. Suggested Policies/Strategies to Increase Densities: AQ 1.3.1 Increase residential and commercial densities around clean rail and bus transit stations and corridors. Clean rail and bus transit nodes and corridors are those that are served by rail and buses that are powered by electricity, alternative fuels (i.e., CNG and LNG), or that meet or exceed SULEV emission standards. AQ 1.3.2 Sponsor paratransit transportation systems, such as neighborhood electric vehicle "station cars" or jitneys for short trips to and from transit nodes.* *Potential funding for these policies has been identified in Appendix E. 2-16 Item 10. - 254 HB -576- Exhibit 9 PA UL E. COOK AND ASSOCIATES .� December 12, 2007 Jerry Moffatt Rainbow Disposal Co. P.O. Box 1026 Huntington Beach,CA 92647-1026 Subject: Traffic Analysis,Rainbow Disposal Project Dear Mr. Moffatt, The following is a traffic impact analysis for Baseline and proposed Project conditions at Rainbow Disposal'in the City of Huntington Beach. This traffic analysis has been prepared because of a proposed increase in the allowable transfer station tonnage at the facility. I BASELINE CONDITIONS The Baseline conditions include the following. • Current refuse collection and disposal for the Cities of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley. • Current operation of a material recovery facility(MRF) and transfer station permitted at 2,800 tons per day. • A new 20,800 square foot maintenance facility. • A new 10,700 square foot bin repair shop. • A new CNG fuel island. • Implementation of a three-cart residential pickup system. Baseline Traffic Conditions Table I shows the 3,023 average daily trips generated by Rainbow Disposal under Baseline conditions. Table i includes a breakdown of trips by type of vehicle, converted to passenger car equivalents(PCEs). Based on information in the Highway Capacity Manual,passenger car equivalents(PCEs) for flat terrain were assigned as follows: Passenger cars and light trucks PCE= 1.0 Front-loaders, roll-off and rent-a-bin trucks (35 feet long) PCE=2.0 Transfer trucks(70 feet long) PCE=3.0 Table I is based on 24-hour surveys conducted daily of different types of vehicles entering the facility's driveways during the week of February 20, 2006. The surveys included employee vehicles parked on Nichols Street. Total trips(entering and exiting)were calculated based on the type of vehicle, the day of the week,time of day and their schedules. The new daily PCE 7155 Little Harbor Drive • Huntington Beach, California 92648 • (714) 960-8298 Fax (714) 536-1333 Item 10. - 256 1-113 -578- Jerry Moffatt December 12, 2007 Page 2 trips generated by the three-cart system and the CNG facility are also included in Table I. Under Baseline conditions,the AM peak hour is from 8:00 to 9:00 and accounts for approximately 8%(248)of the daily trips. The PM peak hour is from 4:00 to 5:00 pm and accounts for approximately 4%(131) of the daily trips. It should be noted that most employees enter or leave the facility before or after peak hours. Also,Rainbow Disposal schedules their vehicles to avoid traveling on arterial highways during peak traffic hours for time efficiency. Peak hour traffic counts (see Appendix A)were conducted to determine existing conditions at six arterial intersections most heavily used by Rainbow Disposal. The six intersections are: Warner Avenue and Goldenwest Street Warner Avenue and Gothard Street Warner Avenue and Nichols Street Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard Slater Avenue and Gothard Street Slater Avenue and Nichols Street Figure I shows existing geometric conditions at the six intersections. Figure 2 shows AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes for the six intersections under Baseline conditions including the three- cart system and CNG facility, II PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Project includes the following: • .Increase in the maximum allowed transfer station tonnage from the current 2,800 tons to a maximum of 4,000 tons. • Increased use of the CNG fuel island above Baseline conditions. Proiect Traffic Conditions The following describes the trip generation and trip distribution used to determine Project intersection impacts. a. Trip Generation Table If shows the 3,597 average daily trips generated by Rainbow Disposal under Baseline plus Project conditions. Table II includes a breakdown of trips by type of vehicle, converted to passenger car equivalents (PCEs). HB -579- Item 10. - 257 Jerry Moffatt December 12, 2007 Page 3 Trip generation for the Project is shown on Table M. The Project generates 574 new trips on an average day. Approximately 18%(106) are during the 8:00-9.00 AM peak hour and 6%(35) during the 4:00-5:00 PM peak hour. Trip generation was determined by Rainbow management analyzing the type of vehicles and the time they will be entering and leaving the facility to deliver or remove the additional 1,600 tons to be handled by the transfer station on an average day. The Project also includes 86 new trips to the CNG fuel island above Baseline conditions. 30 of these trips are in the AM peak hour. b. Tnip Distribution Figure 3 shows the Project trips distributed through the six intersections during the AM and PM peak hours. The trip distribution was analyzed by Rainbow management and Paul Cook and Associates based on current patterns of movement to and from the facility for transfer station related traffic. III BACKGROUND CONDITIONS The Baseline Conditions are analyzed based on 2006 surveys conducted at Rainbow Disposal and 2006 traffic counts taken at the six intersection that were analyzed. To analyze project impacts, the inclusion of traffic generated by growth is appropriate. Known as background traffic, it is expected that development in the area will add traffic to the intersections during the implementation of the proposed project. Background traffic was determined by utilizing a growth factor of 1% per year. This growth factor includes vacant land proposed to be developed on the southeast corner of Nichols Street and Warner Avenue. Based on the nature of the proposed project, it was determined that five years or 2011 would be an appropriate future year to analyze as the background conditions. Figure 5 shows the 2011 plus Project AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Table IV shows the intersection capacity utilization(ICU)analysis results for 2011 plus Project. Levels of service(LOS) remain the same as the analysis for Baseline plus Project at the six intersections. IV INTERSECTION ANALYSIS This study analyzes traffic conditions at six intersections that are most impacted by Rainbow Disposal vehicles as listed previously. Figure 4 shows Baseline plus Project traffic volumes. Table IV shows the results of the traffic analysis for the Project using the Highway Capacity Manual Intersection Capacity Utilization(ICU)method. The worksheets for these analyses are included in Appendix B. Item 1.0. - 258 HB -580- Jerry Moffatt December 12,2007 Page 4 The maximum increase in ICU is 0.02 in the AM peak hour at the intersection of Warner Avenue and Nichols Street and 0.01 in the PM peak hour at the intersections of Warner Avenue and Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue and Nichols Street, The Project does not change existing Levels of Service(LOS) except at the intersection of Warner and Beach where the ICU in the PM peak increases from 0.80 to 0.81 and changes the LOS from C to D. The change in ICU at each of these six arterial intersections due to Rainbow's proposed Project is insignificant. V FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Rainbow Disposal's proposed increased transfer station tonnage to 4,000 allowable tons will increase average daily trips by 574,AM peak trips by 106 and PM peak trips by 35. These peak hour trips were distributed to six arterial intersections. The analysis results are shown in Table IV. The results of the analysis shows the Project has no significant traffic impact. Please contact me at(714) 960-8298 or Nook2Qsocal.rr.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Paul E, Cook President '��pl LSSIp,�r Cho ��2 Cc: Chip Clements ro Q Dick Harlow u No.B� cL �. Attachments: *T TRAFF�G Appendix A-Intersection Traffic Counts OF C A �Q Appendix B -ICU Worksheets HB -581- Item 10. - 259 r0 O ABLE i C Baseline Passenger Car iEgeivalerds Flour rontloadertutomatei rats roil off transfer metal dirt recycle green public mployeej CNG total 12-1a_m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 2a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-Um. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3-4a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-5a_m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-6a.rn. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 6-7a.m. 68 56 10 18 36 3 3 0 9 56 160 0 419 7-8a m. 0 0 0' : 0 0 0 0r 0 66 24 _24 120 8-'9&M a 46. 20.': 36 30 0 0. 0 18 72: 10 6 248 9-10a.m. 98 36 0 36 51 6 12 18 0 86 36 0 379 10-11 a.m. 26 24 20 8 36 0 0 0 18 90 25 24 271 11 -12 _m. 8 24 0 36 54 0 9 18 0 82 15 0 246 z 12-1 .m. 52 56 20 26 33 6 0 0 1a 90 0 6 307 , 1 -2 .m. 22 24 0 24 54 0 9 18 0 84 8 0 243 ` 0`0 2-3 .gym. 28 16 20 22 18 3 0 0 6 88 0 0 201 �1 3-4 .m, 28 28 16 36 24 0 9 0 6 90 52 6 295 4- m. 6 14 :6:- 16 9 0 0 0 3 ;75 2 tl 131 5-6 .rn. 0- 0 0.. ._ 16- 0 0 `6 0: . : 0 62 47 ; 0 131 6-7 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 18 7-8 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 8-9 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9-10 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10-11 P.M. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 -12a,m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 total.-I 344 1 326 112 1274 1 345 18 54 84 78 943 379 66 3023 m d- 00 43 C3' 00 KBLE If Baselines Plugs Project Passe gger Car Equivalents Hours rontloader utornate rab roll off transfe r metal dirt recycle green public mployeel CNG i total 12- la.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 2a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-3a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3-4a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-5a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5-6a.sn. 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 6-7a.m. 60 48 10 8 90 3 6 0 18 56 111 0 410 7..-8a.m. 0 0 ❑..: 12 0 0 6- ❑ 0' . ;�. 24 30 A38 8-9a.m. 2a 56. 20 36 84 0 0: a 0 : 18 -7.2 10. 30 354 9-10a.m. 82 56 2 28 0 6 1 18 24 0 86 36 8 346 10-11 a-m. 31 52 18 20 90 0 0 0 18 90 25 24 368 11 -12 .m. 27 56 2 30 84 0 18 24 0 82 15 0 338 12-1 .m. 74 56 14 28 0 6 0 0 18 90 0 6 292 01 1 -2 .m. 10 28 6 28 84 0 18 18 0 84 8 24 308 2-3 .rn. 22 44 14 24 84 6 0 0 18 88 0 0 300 cq 3-4 .m. 28 40 12 28 78 3 12 0 0 90 52 30 373 4:-5 .m. 14 4 8. 28 18 0 0 0 12 :; 80 : 2 0 .166 5- m. 0 0 0 8 36 0 6 0 0 6q' 46 0 160 6-7 .m.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 0 18 7-8 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 8-9 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9-10 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 10-11 .m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 -12a.m. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 total:1 376 440 106 278 648 24 90 102 102 950 329 152 3597 CD N C N TABLE Ill N Project Passenger Car Equivalents Hours Baseline Plus Project PCE Baseline PCE JProject PC 12-1a.m. 0 0 0 1 - 2a.m. 0 0 0 2-3a.m. 0 0 0 3_4a.m. 0 0 0 4-5a.m. 0 0 0 5-6a.m. 2 2 1 0 6-7 a.m. 410 419 -9 7-8a.its.-. 1313 ! 120' 18 8-9a.rn: 354 is 248 : 106 9-10a.m. 346 379 -33 10-11 a m. 368 271 97 11 -12 .rrj. 338 246 92 12-1 p.m. 292 307 -15 1 -2 .m. 308 243 65 cc 2-3 .m. 300 201 99 373 295 78 4-5 .m. 1.66 131 35 5-B .m. 160 131' 29 6-7 .m. 18 18 07-8 .m. 12 12 0 8-9 .m. 0 0 0 9-1 O .m. 12 0 12 10-11 ,m. 0 0 0 11 -12a.m. 0 0 0 total: 3 597 3 023 574 �n 06 a� X X enned • • NY July 7, 2017 www.kennedycommission.org 17701 Cowan Ave.,Suite 200 Irvine,CA 92614 949 250 0909 Fax 949 263 0647 Ms. Jennifer Villasenor City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Comments on Huntington Beach's General Plan Update - Land Use Element Dear Ms. Villasenor: The Kennedy Conunission(the Conunission) is a coalition of residents and community organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families earning less than $20,000 annually in Orange County. Formed in 2001, the Conunission has been successful in partnering with Orange County jurisdictions to create effective housing policies that have led to the new construction of homes affordable to lower income working families. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the City of Huntington Beach's General Plan Update. We have reviewed the draft and are submitting this letter to provide public continents. As the City moves forward with the update, the Commission urges the City to continue its support for the development of affordable homes and consider the following: 1. Revise Goal LU-4 Policy A to read as: Encourage a mix of residential types to accorrunodate people with diverse housing needs at all income levels. 2. Revise Goal LU-4 Policy E to read as: Encourage housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community to be located in proximity to employment to reduce vehicle miles traveled. 3. Include a stand-alone policy under Goal LU-4: Encourage the development of affordable homes for lower income households and workers in the City. 4. Ensure the update of the General Plan is consistent with the Housing Element pursuant to Section 65300.5 of the State Government Code. Ranked among the top ten least affordable metropolitan areas in the country, Orange County is suffering from an affordable housing crisis. A resident must earn at least $34.87 per hour to afford a two-bedroom apartment at a fair market rent of$1,813 a month.' As rents and the number of residents needing affordable homes have continually increased, the number of affordable homes being built for lower income households has not kept up with the demand. An additional 109,965 affordable rental homes are needed to address Orange County's housing needs for lower income renters.'- Out of Reach 2017-The I ligh Cost of Housing,National Low[ucome Housing Coalition,p.38,2017. 'Orange County Renters in Crisis:A Call for Action,California Housing Partnership Corporation,p. 1,May 2017. 11g -585- Item 10. - 263 Ms. Jerinifer Villasenor July 7, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Burdened by the high cost of housing, on a single night in January 2017, nearly 4,800 people experienced homelessness in Orange County.3 The need to address this crisis is urgent, especially for homeless children. During the 2015 to 2016 school year, 28,450 students in grades Pre-K through 12" grade were identified as homeless living in unstable environments in the Orange County school districts. In addition, according to the recent release of the Cost Study of Homelessness, close to $300 million was spent to address homelessness in Orange County during 2014 to 2015.5 Studies have shown that affordable housing coupled with supportive services is a cost-efficient intervention that will safely house individuals experiencing chronic homelessness. With high housing costs and sigiuficant lack of affordable homes, many workers and families, especially those who earn lower wages, struggle financially to live in the city they work in. These impacts not only hurt workers and families but may also impact the city's economic competitiveness and attractiveness to major employers to provide jobs. Locating homes, specifically affordable homes, near transit,job centers and neighborhood services will decrease travel costs and allow individuals to save money and spend it elsewhere in the City. In particular, the enviroiunental impacts of a development are especially less drastic when a person can afford to live and spend their money in the same community in which the), work in. In 2017,the average commute time to work for Orange County residents was approximately 30 minutes and approximately 87% of commuters drove alone,6 Improving location accessibility and connectivity reduces the dependency for residents, especially for lower income households and workers, to drive their automobiles. This will lead to decreased environrriental impacts, such as vehicles miles traveled(VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions, which will contribute to the project's overall purpose and intent to create a sustainable transit oriented neighborhood. The General Plan will also align with the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) and help the City implement and comply with SB 375 goals of reducing VMT and greenhouse gas emissions. Please keep us informed of any revisions, updates and meetings regarding the City's General Plan Update. If you have any questions, please contact me at(949) 250-0909 or cesarc@kennedycornniissiotl.org. Sincerely, L,� 6),V� —0 Cesar Covarrubias Executive Director 'Orange Cotnrty Point in Time Count 2017,County of Orange,May 2017. 'OC Community Indicators 2017,Childrett and Families Commission of Orange County.p,X May 2017. Cost Study of Homelessness Excculive Stimmary,Orange County United Way,,iarnboree and University of California.Irvine,p.2,March 2017. Profile of Huntington Beacli,Southern California Association of Governments,p,22,May 2017, Item 10. - 264 HB -586- HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board Environmental Board General Plan EIR Comments As an overall document, we as the Environmental Board saw numerous positive measures outlined in the General Plan to improve the envirotunent of our city while maintaining consideration for the natural elements impacted by our city's growth and development. Some concerns, questions, and general comments on specific sections are detailed below. 4.3 Biological Resources Goal ERC-1: Adequately sized and located parks meet the changing recreational and leisure needs of existing and future residents. ERC-l.F: Continue to balance and maintain a mix of recreational focused and passive and natural environment areas within open spaces. How does this "protect special status species"? The balance is not indicated and it would be easy to interpret the need for recreation over native landscapes. This policy does not support special status species. This policy should be rewritten to state the City's desire to do that. Example: "Work to preserve, expand and rebuild native habitats that support special status species within open spaces while designing passive recreational uses to provide for the leisure needs of existing and future residents"(include studies that show the benefits for these types of more reflective and quiet spaces.) (p. 4.3-8) ERC-3.D, ERC-6.A, ERC-6.13,ERC-6.C, and ERC-6.D are excellent policies to support the goal of supporting special status species and we concur that these(p. 4.3-8, 4.3-9) Goal ERC-6: Various agencies that oversee habitat areas and wildlife corridors, including but not limited to parks, beaches, coastal dunes, marine waters, and wetlands, coordinate decisiorunaking and management to ensure ongoing protection of resources. ERC-6.E: Reclaim the ASCON site and consider restoring it to native coastal salt marsh and to expand the wetland corridor associated with the Huntington Beach Wetlands. This policy needs to be updated/removed to reflect the latest Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Proposed Remediation Action Plan (RAP) for the ASCON site. There will be no opportunity to restore any salt marsh or wetlands here so this is not supporting this goal. (p. 4.3-9) Policy ERC-6.E would provide for city efforts to reclaim and restore the ASCON site in order to restore and expand wetland habitat, expanding the beneficial functions of the Huntington Beach Wetlands. Based on DTSC's most recent RAP and soon to commence construction plans, this statement is totally unrealistic and needs to be removed. (p.4.3-9) Sensitive habitats include those that are of special concern to resource agencies and those that are considered to be and are protected under CEQA, Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code, CCC, and Section 404 of the CWA. Sensitive natural communities within the planning area include: • Southern Coastal Salt Marsh(1,068 acres) HB -587- Item 10. - 265 HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board • Southern Foredunes(6 acres) • Southern Dune Scrub (4 acres) • Eucalyptus (61 acres) • Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Scrub (32 acres) Identify where these areas are both by referencing the map where they are shown and also by giving a general description next to this listing. For example, where are the 32 acres of Southern Cottonwood Willow Riparian Scrub? A written description next to a policy helps to inform that policy a little better. If those 32 acres are spread across the entire City in pockets, that will require different actions than if they are concentrated in one area. (p. 4.3-10) ERC-6.F: Establish aquatic and terrestrial connections between the Bolsa Chica Wetlands and Central Park by restoring area in the oil fields. What control does the City have over the oil fields, land use? If the developer complies with the land use and zoning there won't be a chance for additional conditions to development. Be more specific about the goals of restoration, e.g. "require the cleanup and restoration of oil fiends to support special status species and restore native and sensitive vegetation communities. Provide enough space to ensure the health and longevity of these species and vegetation communities" and spell out more clearly in the General Plan, perhaps by an overlay, of what is required with respect to establishing these connections: a certain percentage of the land, etc. (p. 4.3-11) Waterbodies within the planning area include the Santa Ana River, marine waters, and the Sunset, Westminster, Ocean View, East Grove-Wintersberg, Huntington Beach,Talbert, and Fountain Valley flood charmels. Please indicate that these "water bodies" are owned and maintained by the County of Orange and are regularly denuded of plant material to allow the channels to perform their primary function of flood protection. It's disingenuous at best, and dishonest at worst, to list these "bodies of water" in this section as if they can and are maintained as natural habitats. It is not in the City's best interests to do anything other than maintain these areas as flood control channels. Continue to list them here however make it abundantly clear they should not be counted as contributing to Biological Resources. (p.4.3-11) Goal ERC-7: Wetland areas that serve as important biological resources for threatened and endangered birds, fish, and other species are protected and restored. ERC-7.E: Reduce pollutant runoff from new development and urban runoff to the maximum extent practicable. Please list actions, e.g. "Reduce pollutant runoff from new development and urban runoff by developing an on-going informational campaign to residents and measuring and publishing the success of that effort every 5 years." (p. 4- 3.12) Goal ERC-7: Wetland areas that serve as important biological resources for threatened and endangered birds, fish, and other species are protected and restored. There should be a policy to expand wetlands if the opportunity arises such as placing conditions on new development in Item 10. - 266 HB -588- HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board exchange for parkland or other strategies. The health of the some wetlands depend on expanding them. (p.4.3-12) However, future development could potentially result in indirect loss or degradation of wildlife corridors through increased light and noise pollution, introduction of native species, habitat fragmentation, and increased urban runoff. This is a very good point and we are glad it was made. (4.3-12) MM4.3-1 Mitigation Measures: If no active nests are identified on or within 250 feet of the construction site, no further mitigation is necessary. If an active nest of a Migratory Bird Treaty Act protected species is identified on site (per established thresholds) a 100 foot no-work buffer shall be maintained between the nest and construction activity. Since the buffer zone for construction approval is 250 feet, would a 100 foot no-work construction zone offer the same protection or should this be increased to 250 feet? 4.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions This section discusses emissions of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) in the planning area and evaluates the potential for associated effects of GHG on climate change due to implementation of the General Plan Update. Information in this section is based on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions TBR prepared by Atkinsl (Volume 1), and the GHG Emissions Inventory and Forecast Technical Report prepared by Michael Baker hiternational2 (Appendix C, Volume III). The discussion about baseline conditions, including additional inforirration on the existing enviromllental setting and regulatory framework for GHG, is included in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions TBR. The General Plan Update addresses GHG in the Environmental Resources and Conservation Element. However, policies in the Land Use Element, Circulation Element, and Public Services and Infrastructure Element also help to reduce the citywide greenhouse gas emissions. The accompanying draft Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program (GGRP) prepared by Michael Baker International (Appendix G, Volume III), contains specifics about the city's GHG emissions and specific strategies to reduce emissions below established levels. No comment letters regarding GHG emissions were received in response to the NOP circulated for the General Plan Update. Q. 4.6.1 C3 p. 4.6-3 How much of the GHG from visitors' traffic is accounted for in the inventory? Q. p. 4.6-4 "Establish a mechanism to monitor the plan's progress toward achieving the level and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving specified levels. Section 5.2 of the draft GGRP meets this requirement" Q. p. 4.6-5 What is the City's MTCO2 per service population? "a level of 53 percent below 2020 emissions levels is established as the threshold of significance for GHG emissions in 2040 for purposes of this EIR." Transportation produces majority of GHG impacts • Relate everything to cars-off-the-road ineasure so people can understand (e.g. • Include measures that can facilitate electric charging in homes to promote o Specific permitting for such installations including adopted standard plans HB -589- Item 10. - 267 HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board o Materials describing how solar can charge cars at night and systems Q. Should local industrial contributions to GHG emissions (e.g. AES Power Plant, Republic Services, and other industrial tenants)be incorporated into the GHG reduction program? The AES upgrade may already address this point for that facility. Republic, as a community contractor, certainly affects local GHG production and would be logical to include specifically in an overall GHG reduction strategy. Ch. 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 1. Environmental impacts of industrial and commercial hazards affecting residential areas, including ongoing monitoring and response to local hazards posed by the Rainbow/Republic Waste Processing Facility and other local air emission sources, and the City's role, should be addressed. 2. Specific enforcement and mitigation plans for storm drain and other waste dumping abuse should be addressed. 3. Scenarios for the long-term (post-remediation) plan for ASCON and other waste cleanup sites, consistent with the characteristics of those sites and public safety, should be developed. Ch. 4.9 Land Use and Planning Q. How will the designation of Research and Technology be defined? With the limited parameters discussed in the document, this rezoning seems to be a positive change to encompass a growing field as well as reduce emissions, noise, etc in a positive manner for the city. Ch. 4.10 Noise Goal N-2B It appears that this goal allows for a higher than recommended standard for level of exterior noise. Ch. 414 Transportation/Traffic and Appendix B. Circulation Traffic Study Planning and Circulation Characterization 1. It is noted that the traffic data used to support this element was taken in 2014,before many current high-density developments were completed and impacts on traffic fully realized. While redoing the traffic study for this update may not be feasible, perhaps the EIR should include a more specific estimates of present traffic based on those changes, and indicate any Item 10. - 268 HB -590- HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board impact on the long-term predictions. If this has been done perhaps the post-2414 update methodology could be described in a little more detail. 2. The 2413 Bicycle Master Plan, which is referenced in discussion of bicycle infrastructure,has been recently referred to as outdated. The 2413 bicycle master should be reviewed and updated (or expected updates described) in order to sufficiently inform the revised General Plan, 4. There is a lack of detail relating to urban run-off and transportation. hi addition to being a water quality issue, backed up stonnn drains affect road and intersection access and flow during rainy periods. There are several locations in Huntington Beach where this is so predictable that temporary "roadway flooded signs" are placed before the rain begins. The draft EIR mentions the connection, but does not elaborate, and provides no documentation of impacts, or plan to address impacts. 4. The EIR notes several rights of Nays which are currently considered unlikely to be developed and recommends that they be removed from the Master Plan, effectively eliminating them as potential future projects. The EIR should consider the circumstances under which those potential projects might be beneficial (information which should be available since provision was originally made for those projects), the specific justification for removing these options from the buildout plan, and the potential use and environmental impacts of likely alternative use. Neighborhood Circulation: 5. Maintaining/preserving neighborhood character should address sense of place, and quality of life for residents beyond average daily trips, and solely the movement of people from one place to another. 6. The safety of children in and around streets for play, and getting to and from school should be addressed. 7. Areas around schools and parks throughout the City should be considered, where not already so done, as pedestrian zones (PEZ). Local Intersection Mitigation 8. An example of local traffic impacts associated with development (with implications for other intersections similarly affected.): traffic flow at Gothard and Center has already downgraded noticeably since the recent(2016) completion of high density residential development at and near that intersection. Updated traffic measurements are recommended if not already done. Mitigation should be implemented with a suggestion of initial implementation "low impact" changes such as use of protected turn signals in preference to lane addition. If intersection expansion is necessary, the City is encouraged to base the plan on actual data rather than projections of reduced future demand (in this case,the difference between adding lanes in. one direction versus two directions). Development Impacts 9. Parking Capacity (reference Page 4.14-21): While it is desirable to encourage alternative transportation modes which reduce the demand for parking, new projects should not rely on this as a justification for reduced parking allotments until such incentives have proven to be effective for existing facilities. HB -591- Item 1 U. - 269 HUNTINGT'ON BEACH Environmental Board Mass Transit: 10. The City should work closely with OCTA to develop Transit Centers (including identification of candidate locations) and to otherwise expand infrastructure to accommodate increased use off mass transit including expansion of Park and Ride lots where warranted. 11. The North-South rail line which runs just east of Gothard represents an opportunity to connect Huntington Beach with commuter rail lines. The right of way runs close to the Goldenwest Transportation Center malting this a natural location for a passenger rail station. The City is encouraged to explore this option with OCTA and the other cities through which the right of way would pass. 12. The feasibility and potential benefits of expansion of Huntington Beach shuttle routes and schedules (from a seasonal basis to year round) should be considered. 13. Advanced strategies for on-demand transportation services and other strategies to address specific needs, including senior/disabled access and first mile/last mile options for commuters, should be explored and the impacts on circulation evaluated. Infrastructure for Zero Emission and Autonomous Vehicles Goal CIRC-8: The General Plan gives mention of some of the following technologies. Many are very close or already being implemented, and so we recommend that consideration of the following be given near-term priority. 14. The city should plan to accommodate the upgrade of electrical grid infrastructure for expansion of private battery electric vehicle charging stations, and develop options for an expanded network of public charging stations. The incorporation of charging stations into the base of selected City-owned street light standards is suggested as one option for the latter. 15. The city should support infrastructure (including public signage, and update ofpennitting procedures where needed) for reduced- and zero-emission fuel alternatives including natural gas and hydrogen. 16. The City should update infrastructure as needed to facilitate autonomous vehicles as those standards become available. Appendix C. GHG Inventory Forecast Appendix C, Page 5, Table 1 California Statewide GHG Emissions, 2005 and 2012: Sector"High Global Warming Potential"—what is included in this sector at our state level? Why does the Huntington Beach Inventory Summary(page 6) not account for this sector or these industries, or activities? Appendix C, Page 10-11, Natural Gas: Because AES Huntington Beach Powerplant resides in our community the emissions output should have Scope 1 through 3 accounted for in the HB GHG inventory, not as an unknown indirect assumption from SCEs electricity use. Appendix C, Page 13, A broad assumption on PHEVs, EVs, and hybrids to interpolated for a 6% increase in vehicle miles traveled. As the data suggests, Transportation may be our Item 10. - 270 HB -592- HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board biggest issue to resolve since it continues to increase dramatically. Increase use of the PHEVs, EVs, and hybrids should be monitored, and ways to dramatically improve transportation options, and technology should be pursued. Appendix C,Page 23, Reduction Target: Why has HB not committed to a minimum reduction goal of 15%below baseline levels like our neighbors? Appendix F Coastal Resiliency Program All measures are reasonable and we are glad to see multiple measures being recommended for various flood control, sea level rise, and overall resiliency concerns. However, how will these measures be implemented or enforced? Appendix G. GHG Reduction Program 3.2 Local Accomplishments Local accomplishments are strategies taken by the City, local residents, and local businesses that reduce GHG emissions, or support reductions by providing education and resources. Kudos to the City on its accomplishments particularly in setting the example for energy efficiency projects and solar installations and encouraging the community to do the same. The downtown shuttle should be analyzed to see how many miles driven it is reducing and how it can be utilized to reduce even snore. I've never heard of the downtown shuttle so perhaps more education of the local population would be appropriate and useful in the off-season. EE-2 —Rental unit retrofits: Improve energy efficiency in residential rental units. Like owner-occupied homes, older rental units are often significantly less energy efficient than newer units. Although renters usually do not have much ability to retrofit their homes, effective partnerships between renters and landlords can make these actions easier, more equitable, and beneficial to everyone involved. Improvements to windows and doors, insulation, appliances, and water heaters are examples of options for energy-efficiency retrofits in rental units, and a variety of educational and financing programs make retrofits easier and more affordable. (p.12) An analysis needs to be made of the effect these improvements have on the affordability of the housing. If the rents are raised and/or renters evicted in order to make the improvements,the City's affordable housing goals may be affected. [Are there approaches employed by other cities that have been successful in addressing this .issue? - MS] T-2— Shared parking: Use shared parking strategies to maximize development potential while providing a sufficient supply of parking. P. 14 Parking is an important feature for new developments in Huntington Beach, and it is critical to ensure there are enough spaces. However, some developments play only need most HB -593- Item 10. - 271 HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board of their parking spaces for part of the day. Shared parking allows property owners greater flexibility in the design of their developments and helps avoid creating large parking lots that are empty most of the time, while continuing to provide an adequate supply of off-street parking to meet demand. 2020 GHG Reduction: t,030 MTCO2e 2040 GHG Reduction: 12,740 MTCO2e Explain how this creates GHG reductions. Reducing parking because there is an assumption that residents follow the traditional model of driving to work every day, is not acceptable. This policy should not be cast as a GHG strategy unless there is solid data that residents there do not park during the day. In fact, because many people actually work from home or have nontraditional work schedules, this strategy can increase emissions as people drive around looking for a place to park. Not only is this probably adding to emissions, its underlying assumptions are outdated and should be revisited as a general policy. [Ideally the study would look at a range of scenarios to assess an estimated figure for 2040, since we can't be certain what driving patterns will look like. - MS] T-3 —Increased transit ridership: hcrease transit ridership to minimize congestion, improve air quality, and promote increased mobility. Public transit is a critical service that allo-'vs all people, including those without access to cars, a way to effectively travel within Huntington Beach and to other communities in the region. It also emits fewer GHG emissions per rider than a personal vehicle and reduces congestion on local roadways. Huntington Beach can continue to work with the Orange County Transportation Authority to allow for high-quality public transit that is fast, frequent,predictable, convenient, and safe. Implementation actions would be more effective if they extended to the city working directly with OCTA to develop critical infrastructure and services to make mass transit more viable: Increased Park-and-Ride capacity, development of a rail commuter link using the existing rail line adjacent to the Goldenwest Trasportation Center, and solutions(including rideshare, shuttle or other approaches) to effectively address "first mile/last mile" connection between mass transit centers and homes. T-4 --Carsharing: Attract carshare services to Huntington Beach and promote them as a supplemental transportation service. Carshare services, such as Zipcar, provide vehicles to people who may need a second car only occasionally, allowing them to avoid buying a vehicle that may sit unused most of the time. These on-demand services make it easier for residents to have fewer cars, or even to avoid car ownership entirely. Similarly, ride-sourcing services such as Lyft or Uber make it easier for residents to take occasional trips as needed without relying on their own vehicles, and are also a convenient choice for visitors. (p. 15) Item 1.0. - 272 HB -594- HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board Explain how the mere fact of non-ownership translates into fewer miles driven and thus GHG reductions. Also, for Uber, Lyft and other"ride-sourcing" services, are the miles driven while waiting for customers accounted for? [Assuming the same passenger miles, total miles driven would increase with ridesharing. There would be some benefit from fewer total vehicles, for reduced parking load. - MS] T-5 Telecommuting and alternative work schedules: Establish telecommuting and alternative work schedules to reduce peak commute traffic. Telecommuting and alternative work schedules provide an alternative to the typical commute for flexible employees and businesses. Alternative work schedules let employees travel outside of the nonnal rush hour periods, resulting in a shorter commute time and less congestion, reducing GHG emissions from vehicles. Telecommuting lets workers further reduce their commute by allowing them to work from home for some days in the week, which decreases GHG emissions and can help improve employee satisfaction. (p. 15) How is the City planning to effect this strategy for other than its own forces? [Community Wi-Fi is the one program that directly addresses this. - MS] T-7 —Shuttle service: Provide a year-round shuttle service for visitor destinations. Huntington Beach in the past has provided shuttle service during busy visitor tines, such as the Fourth of July or the US Open of Surfing. As feasible, the City can follow the example of many other communities and provide a year-round shuttle that serves Downtown, the beach, and other visitor destinations. This makes it easier for visitors to get around without a car, and can also provide a viable transportation alternative for local residents who work in these areas.(p. 16) 2020 GHG Reduction: 90 MTCO2e 2040 GHG Reduction: 60 MTCO2e This strategy should be studied to show that it is more than a convenience and reduces miles driven. If the distance and number of riders doesn't impact GHG appreciably,then the service should be categorized as an economic strategy. It would count as a traffic strategy if only there weren't more cars to take the place of the ones taken off the road by this service thus keeping the traffic congestion about the same. [Also, this strategy is viable as a year-round strategy only if economics favor it. This is probably the reason the current service is seasonal. -MS] T-9 - Create a new generation of mass transit users: promote the use of buses and shuttles to middle school students and their parents. To reduce miles driven, reduce traffic congestion around schools and recreation facilities, increase student safety and promote ridership on mass transit, work with OCTA and/or the City shuttle service in the off season to make mass transit an alternative way to get to school. HB -595- Item 10. - 273 HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board Coordinate with the Huntington Beach City School District to adjust schedules, if needed, and to promote mass transit as a safe and viable way for middle school students to attend school and travel to tutoring, recreational facilities for after school sports, and other extracurricular activities students would attend. As the students move to high school, engage the Huntington Beach Union High School District to do the same for its population. [This would be a positive outcome but requires city/school district support, and also buy-in from parents as well as students. -MS] F-2 —Electric vehicles: Increase electric vehicle adoption in Huntington Beach. Modern electric vehicles (EVs) are a new option for car buyers. They are quieter and cheaper to operate than gasoline or diesel vehicles, do not emit pollution or GHGs, and can increasingly meet the daily needs of many drivers. As the cost of EVs continues to decline and these vehicles become more popular, the City and regional partners should provide education about EVs and ensure that the local infrastructure can effectively support them. The City should develop a program to encourage in-hone charging stations by a) identifying neighborhoods where the infrastructure readily supports it, b) creating promotional materials that explain how it can be done, and c) developing standard plans along with a clear, straightforward permitting process designed to facilitate permitting for those facilities. Charging at night reduces the possibility of using more expensive, dirtier energy in the middle of the day. [Extensive deployment of residential charging stations may have some impact on the local electrical grid, however, utilities are already developing plans to incorporate them. Opportunities for expanding the network of distributed public charging stations should be explored; city-owned street light standards represent a possible platform. It should also be noted that hydrogen vehicles also represent an electric-drive, zero emission platform. Infrastructure to support those vehicles (in particular, fueling stations) should be considered an equivalent technology [from a GHG perspective] with battery electrics. - MS] CA-3 -Shop local: Improve the visibility of locally produced goods in Huntington Beach retail markets. Buying locally produced goods helps a community in multiple ways. It reduces the distance that products have to travel to the store, decreasing congestion and reducing emissions of air pollutants and GHGs. It also helps to keep more revenue in the community, which supports the Huntington Beach economy and benefits local residents and businesses. Additionally, this can help businesses participating in Huntington Beach's Recycling Market Development Zone, which provides economic incentives to businesses using waste materials to produce new goods. While not all goods can be locally sourced, supporting locally produced goods when feasible is environmentally responsible and boosts local economic vitality. (p.28) This pleasure needs to include a link.to accessibility by other modes of transportation such as mass transit, bikes, pedestrians and neighborhood vehicles not just a discussion of buying local Ltem 10. - 274 HB -596- HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board and assuming local transportation. There should be a conscious effort to link these alternate modes to local resources. Page 2, Strategy Development: Should an audit or forecast be performed for the socioeconomic benefit of the strategies (e.g. any and all of the transportation improvements increasing safety and worker productivity)? Page 19, CA-4 THROUGH CA-6 Advanced green technologies, Financing, Workforce Training: these sections should be drafted in parallel to the Appendix L. Economic Development Trends Pages 23-33 Strategy Implementation Actions: Exploration and encouragement language should be stronger(i.e. execute and implement) through finance Appendix 1. Citywide Urban Runoff Manalzement ProLyram 1.3 Water Quality Element Table 1-1 Summary of Water Quality Element Programs Quality Planning Area-Based Program Santa Ana River: 1. Evaluate opportunities to reduce dry weather flow and reduce diversions 2. Continue to work with OC River Park Project and incorporate water quality enhancement where feasible Talbert Channel: 1. Evaluate opportunities to reduce/reuse dry weather flow at Bartlett Park Coastal: 1. Develop expanded education and enforcement programs 2. Continue dry weather flows and infiltration practice where feasible; construct flow diversion where not feasible 3. Operate and maintain hydrodynamic separator (CDS) treatment units at beach outfalls 4. Evaluate opportunities to reduce/reuse dry weather flow 5. Enhanced street sweeping and alley cleaning Bolsa Chica Wetlands: HB -597- Item 10. - 275 HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board 1. Continue to operate and maintain hydrodynamic separator(CDS) treatment unit at wetland outfall 2. Evaluate opportunities for water quality features in future development/redevelopment on the AERA property Slater Channel: 1. Operate and maintain hydrodynamic separator unit for dry weather treatment at Central Park 2. Optimize water quality benefits of detention area south of Sully-Miller Lake 3. Evaluate opportunities for water quality features in future dev e 1 opm ent/redevelopment East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel: 4. Evaluate opportunities to reduce/reuse dry weather flow Bolsa Chica Channel: 1. Coordinate with Orange County to clean-up and protect channel in vicinity of Marina HS 2. Evaluate opportunities to reduce/reuse dry weather flow in future development/redevelopment including Boeing property 3. Cooperate with Orange County on projects to improve/restore channels for aesthetics and treatment potential Harbour Area: L Continue to work with Orange County to monitor, maintain and improve trash boom collection system 2. Develop and implement expanded education, incentive and enforcement programs n Support a fair and equitable means to upgrade, monitor and inspect existing pump-out facilities and install new pump-out facilities at appropriate locations in Huntington Harbour 3. Evaluate and implement drain in let retrofit opportunities 4. Continue dry weather flow diversion from Scenario Pump Station to OCSD system 5. Implement Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs) with HOAs, OC Sheriff and Peter's Landing for the maintenance of Marina Trash Skimmers. 6. Evaluate the effectiveness of the Marina Trash Skimmers and install additional through grant opportunities. Additional Citywide Opportunities: 1. Continue the implementation of full scale state-of-the-art irrigation controllers 2. Conduct feasibility study and implement recommendations for constructing trash/gross solids removal device at direct outlets to channels not described above in specific water quality areas 3. Continue working with OCWD on the possibility of using dry weather urban runoff for future seawater barrier injection. 4. Work with local school districts to incorporate retention/detention within Item 10. - 276 1113 -598- HUNTINGTON BEACH Environmental Board applicable areas (e.g., soccer and baseball fields) The same can be said for: Table 3-5 (SotmtBbl� 'y[ �f ,l�llel� rCe Table 3-6 Sum m ary of ew Elements Appendix M Fire Response The professionalism of the Huntington Beach Fire Department is noted and there is no doubt that they continually update their preparedness for all new situations seriously. For the sake of documentation, there is little discussion of preparation for the fire einergency resources particular to high rise and high density residential development which has increased in recent years. An update of Appendix M to address this issue and any anticipated increase in equipment/persommel needs would be help in evaluating the overall General Plan Update and EIR. Appendix P Sea Level Rise 10. Recommendations and Conclusions (bullet 1): hi several places, the main line of defense against SLR seems to be seawalls, levees and bulkheads. The recommendation for is "additional investigation into seawall/bulkhead infrastructure around Huntington Harbour is recommended to improve accuracy of potential hazard zones."However, section 8.1.3 Huntington Harbour Planning Area, it states that"most seawalls in this planning area are privately owned and vary in type, condition, and elevation." We would like to see stronger language that requires these private seawalls to meet certain building and integrity standards to bring them up to the high SLR prediction to protect public and private assets. 10. Recommendations and Conclusions: Add a recommendation to continue to monitor the SLR levels in the Los Angeles basin every 2 years due to the potential exposure of flooding all along our coastal shores. HB -599- Item 10. - 277 From: Lorak(&aol.com To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject: Public Comment on draft of City of H.B.General Plan Update Date: Friday,July 07,2017 4:52:46 PM Ms.Villasenor, I am writing to show my support of the Huntington Beach General Plan item ERC-P.13, which calls for a feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation plan. SCE charges the second highest rates in California and 1 would like our city to study the CCA as an alternative. Fostering free market competition leads to lower rates. Also, CCAs can stimulate the development of high tech energy suppliers in Huntington Beach, leading to creation of local jobs. CCAs would allow Huntington Beach to meet its goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions,transitioning us to renewable energy and reducing local air pollution. I am asking the City Council to carefully this option. Sincerely, Carol Keane 9432 Leilani Dr. Huntington Beach CA 92646 Item 10. - 278 HB -600- From: Andrew&Suz To: Villasenor.Jennifer Subject: Re:Public Comment on draft of City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update(GPU) Date: Friday,lily 07,2017 7:21:35 PM Ms.Villasenor, I write to express my enthusiastic support of the Huntington Beach General Plan item i RC-P.13,which calls for a feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation(CCA)plan. Simply put,1 prefer to choose my own energy providers. Currently,my only choice is to purchase energy from Southern California Edison,which charges the second-highest rates in California.Community Choice Aggregation is a better alternative,because it would foster free market competition leading to lower rates.In addition,CCAs can stimulate the development of high-tech energy suppliers within Huntington Beach,which would create local jobs and benefit our economy.Moreover,by offering multiple tiers of service with different levels of renewable energy,CCA would allow Huntington Beach to cheaply and sustainably meet its goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions without relying on industry or consumer regulations.The transition to rene-wable energy would also improve local air quality.Finally, if Huntington Beach embraces sustainable energy via CCA,it would reinforce our culture and identity as a"Surf City"that protects beaches by slowing sea level rise.Because HB Huddle is committed to individual freedoms,the well-being of Huntington Beach residents,and environmental protection,it follows that we are committed to CCA as well. Community Choice Aggregation will help Huntington Beach meet its vision of a healthy and safe city in which natural resources are protected(May 2017 draft,General Plan).For example,the General Plan envisions that in the near future,"local attractions,such as the beach... draw tourists from near and far".In fact,tourism is listed as one of the top employment sectors in the city.Yet,sea level rise threatens most—if not all—of the city's beaches. CCA would help mitigate this threat by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing climate change,which is the cause of sea level rise. In addition,the city's support of sustainable energy can be used in marketing campaigns to reinforce the"Surf City" image and draw additional tourists. The General Plan also envisions that by 2040,"the community has shifted to renewable energy resources and conservation practices. Support for local businesses to develop new technologies leads to the use of these technologies to support further conservation and sustainability"CCA is an economically responsible means of shifting to renewable energy via free market forces.Furthermore,CCA will establish a local market for energy production,which will lead to the development of new energy technologies within the city.The shift to renewable energy sources will reduce air pollution generated by fossil fuel burning. Importantly,CCA would help the city meet its state-mandated requirement to specify treasures that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As highlighted in the General Plan, "Although often overlooked,modern life in Huntington Beach would be very difficult without abundant local and regional energy resources."I emphasize that CCA is a responsible and sustainable way to meet this important need, and I respectfully requests that the City Council carefully consider this option. Sincerely, Andrew and Suzanne Dehritz Sent from my iPad HB -60 1- Item 10. - 279 From: Mary Ann Celinder To: Villasenor,Jennifer Subject: CCA Date: Friday,July 07,2017 8:40:58 PM July 7, 2017 Jennifer Viliasenor, Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Public Comment on draft of City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update(GPU) Ms.Vilasenor, I want to encourage decision to move forward with the feasibility study of a Community Choice Aggregation(CCA)plan. Having a choice of energy providers will encourage a shift to renewable energy.Let Huntington Beach lead by example and look to the future. This is in line with the General Plan and be beneficial to the city at large, Sincerely, Maiy Ann Celinder 21341 Fleet Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Item 10. - 280 HB -602- Villasenor, Jennifer From: postmaster@hbthenextwave.org on behalf of noreply@hbthenextwave.org Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 9:53 PM To: info Subject: HB GPU Website Comment Submission From: Bruce Allen Message Body: The Noise Teelulical document, Appendix K,the section regarding Aircraft Noise not being an impact is totally incorrect. No airport is located in the planning area, and no major flight corridors overlie Huntington Beach. Long Beach Airport is located approximately 12.5 miles to the northwest of the planning area, and John Wayne Airport is located approximately 3.5 miles to the southeast. These represent the closest commercial airports to the planning area(LACALUC 2003; OCALUC 2008). The planning area is not located within the noise contours for either airport. While there are parts of the city that experience direct flyover by aircraft landing at Long Beach Airport, generally, these aircraft are at sufficient altitude that noise impacts typically would not occur. At our home near Graham and Slater, we hear aircraft arrival traffic into LGB airport constantly from morning until 10pm and sometimes later ! We hear higher altitude, less noisy, arrivals into LAX 24x7. I and many of my neighbors are quite upset and concerned about this. Long Beach residents are also upset about it. This e-mail was sent from a contact form on Huntington Beach General Plan Update (http//wNvw.hbthenextwave.oig) 1-113 -603- Item 10. - 281 Villasenor, Jennifer From: postmaster@hbthenextwave.org on behalf of noreply@hbthenextwave.org Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:26 PM To: info Subject: HB GPU Website Comment Submission From: Connie & Bob Betz Message Body: The section below is no longer accurate. Many neighbors between Edwards and Graham are experiencing a significant increase in aircraft noise. The noise often occurs up to midnight with planes coming in every 10 minutes and is so loud that we cannot hear the television. Other neighbors have complained that they are disturbed when entertaining outside because of the loud and constant aircraft noise. It's unclear if the planes are going into Long Beach Airport, but that seems the mostly airport. We believe there has been a significant increase over the last 2 years and we are now in a flight path. This it is unacceptable. The city needs to measure this and find a way to remediate the noise problem. Aircraft Noise No airport is located in the planning area, and no major flight corridors overlie Huntington Beach. Long Beach Airport is located approximately 12.5 miles to the northwest of the planning area, and John Wayne Airport is located approximately 3.5 miles to the southeast.These represent the closest commercial airports to the planning area(LACALUC 2003; OCALUC 2008). The planning area is not located within the noise contours for either airport. While there are parts of the city that experience direct flyover by aircraft landing at Long Beach Airport, generally, these aircraft are at sufficient altitude that noise impacts typically would not occur. This e-mail was sent from a contact form on Huntington Beach General Plan Update (htt o://www.hbthenextwav",or ) Item 10. - 282 HB -604- Villasenor, Jennifer From: postmaster@hbthenextwave.org on behalf of noreply@hbthenextwave.org Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 1:09 AM To: info Subject: HB GPU Website Comment Submission From: Mario Tabernig Message Body: On your DRAFT NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT in Vokume -111- Apendix K the following paragraph was printed. "Aircraft Noise No airport is located in the planning area, and no major flight corridors overlie Huntington Beach. Long Beach Airport is located approximately 12.5 miles to the northwest of the planning area, and John Wayne Airport is located approximately 3.5 miles to the southeast. These represent the closest commercial airports to the planning area(LACALUC 2003; OCALUC 2008). The planning area is not located within the noise contours for either airport.While there are parts of the city that experience direct flyover by aircraft landing at Long Beach Airport, generally, these aircraft are at sufficient altitude that noise impacts typically would not occur." Not correct The entire paragraph is wrong starting with the distances to airports. Also the aircraft landing at Long Beach in most cases are below 1800 feet above sea level. There is a difference between an aircraft flying at 1600 feet and the same plane flying at 2100. We are trying the city counsel to help with this problem.for a long time and now we see that the problem is kicked aside. You need to amend this section completely. There is a report the city commissioned about 10 years ago about this same problem. This e-mail was sent from a contact form on Huntington Beach General Plan Update (http://\vww.hbthenextwave.oilg) HB -605- Item 10. - 283 Villasenor, Jennifer From: postmaster@hbthenextwave.org on behalf of noreply@hbthenextwave.org Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:55 AM To: info Subject: HB GPU Website Comment Submission From: Mario Tabernig Message Body: Please Verify your assessment of the aircraft noise on Volume-111- Appendix-K-Noise Technical Report-Page 5- under Aircraft Noise. Planes Landing at Long Beach had been a point of sharp problem for many years. Neighbor groups had complain to the city and ask for help. 10 years ago the city commissioned a study of the problem and made some very good recommendations. However this recommendations were never acted upon. Now 10 years later the problem became more frequent as more daily flights were added. Also planes are flying a lower approach constantly at or below 1600 f above sea level by the intersection of Bolsa Chica and Edinger . A sharp decline since the 2100 feet needed to sustain a 3 degrees approach slope. As you see there is a problem with the planing report. This e-mail was sent from a contact form on Huntington Beach General Plan Update (http://www.hbihe-nextwave.or Item 10. - 284 HB -606- Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 12:09 PM To: Pipeline Clerk Agenda Subject: Surf City Pipeline:You have been assigned a new Request#: 30935 Request#30935 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to you. Request type: Problem Request area: City Council -Agenda &Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Albert Ross Description: Comments offered as a critique of your proposed update City of Huntington Beach Proposed General Plan Amendment NO.14-002/Environmental Impact Plan Report NO.14-001 (General Plan Update) Expected Close Date: September 8, 2017 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. KB -607- Item 10. - 285 RECEIYED Ted Ross 2117 SEP -7 PM 12*. 21 9/7/2017 8111 Falmouth Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646-2015 CITY CLERK CITY OF City of Huntington Beach HUNTINGTON l3€:A(-'I) Office of the City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648-2702 Attention: Robin Estanislau, City Clerk Reference; City of Huntington Beach Proposed General Plan Amendment NO.14- 002/Environmental Impact Plan Report NO,14-001 (General Plan Update) Comments offered as a critique of your proposed update: Volume 1 Draft General Plan: 1) Page 1-2"Key Facts" inserted data. Comment on the source; "4)Stanley R. Hoffman Associates"was included without qualifications to provide such data. You would be far better served by using know qualified sources for reference data such as State and Federal entities that specialize in providing such data. 2) General plan uses seriously flawed economic data/analysis. It completely ignores the City's Unfunded Pension Liability and the growing crisis of CaIPERS declining earning thru Investments. 3) Page 1-4 Paragraph on "Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy" & sentence: "The RTP was adopted in 2017 and is updated every four years to address regional transportation needs.The General Plan must be consistent with these regional planning efforts." Comment: Since Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG)is not an elected entity perhaps you need to state how the RTP is actually authorized and how The Huntington Beach General Plan must be consistent with it? I do not believe the electorate has ever been asked to concur with this arrangement? 4) Page 2-24. "Table LU-1 General Plan Distribution of Land Uses". Comment: Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 5) Page 2-25. "Table LU-2 General Plan Development Capacity". Comment: Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 6) Page 3-19. "Figure CIRC-4" Comment: How is the data shown in Figure CIRC-4 subject to change by OCTA updated? Perhaps this should be time dependent in some reference so updates can be easily made to reflect the latest OCTA plans&implementation of Bus routes? 7) Page 4-15. "Figure CIRC-4". Comment: Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 8) Page 4-22. "Table ERC-6 Current and Forecasted Energy Use". Comment: For the data set 2005 &2012 Data source is unreferenced and should be added for clarity. 9) Page 4-38. "Paragraph dealing with"Goal ERC-13. Increase both distributed generation and utility renewable energy sources within municipal and community-wide practices. Sub-item F) "Support Community Choice Aggregation(CCA)feasibility studies." Comment:Seriously object to this statement,neither the City Council nor the residents/electorate has authorized such an effort. The City has no role to play in providing and ensuring public power utilities. This is presumptuous and needs to be stricken from the EIR and considerations in the General Plan Item 10. - 286 HB -608- Update unless the Electorate has.authorizedthis new concept for Public Utilities. As stated in the GP it appears that City staff has assumed that this is a suitable objective and that it should be favored. This just isn't the case and places the City in a potential high risk position for assuming utilities rate control and providing fp,r common consumption in times of economic perill , 10) Page 8-6. "LU-P.10.Affordable Housing Ensure that Huntington Beach has a sufficient supply of housing for individuals and families of all incomes, including extremely low- and very low- income residents.Meet or exceed the target number of affordable units specified in the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation." Comment: I thought this was settled by Mike Gates,City Attorney,that the City of Huntington Beach is not subject to the implied reference to the Kennedy Commission; "target number of affordable units specified in.the city's Regional Housing Needs Allocation. 11) Page 8-32. "ERC-P.13, Community Choice Aggregation". Comment:Seriously object to this statement, neither the City Council northe residents/electorate has authorized such an effort. The City has no role to play in providing and ensuring public utilities. This is presumptuous and needs to be stricken from the EIR and considerations in the General Plan Update unless the Electorate has authorized this new concept foOublic Utilities. As stated in the GP it appears that city staff has assumed that this is a suitabl&6bjective and that it should be favored. This just Isn't the case and places the City In a potential high risk position for assuming utilities rate control and providing for common consumption in times of economic peril! (Repeat!). Comments to Draft EIR Volume 2: 1) Page 2-34. "MM4.10-5 Prior to issuance of construction permits,applicants for new development projects within 500 feet of noise-sensitive receptors will implement the following best management practices to reduce construction noise levels". Comment: This is the item I spoke to during the last public review where 1 pointed the potential damage to infrastructure roads from construction noise generated by hauling trucks inducing long-term cumulative :structural fatigue to roadways by low frequency sound caused by trucks during the hauling process. This can be mitigated by in part the use of specifications requiring trucks be equipped with Air-ride suspension systems, 2) Where items flagged In my General Plan comments have corresponding items within the EIR Volume 2 these comment have direct applicability to those Items also. 3) Several references are made as to source data provided by Michael Baker International,. but no qualifying explanation is provided. Since this must be some sort of private consulting firm what are their qualifications to provide such data. Why haven't appropriate Government agencies specifically chartered to provide source data been used as references? Furthermore,what pedigree does Michael Baker International;have in using their data in the past as compared to actual achieved results? 4) Paragraph 2.6.1: "..............lower level of growth that is reasonably forecast based on the Huntington Beach Traffic Model,which was updated for the 2013 Circulation Element Update, and accounting for existing conditions within the city of Huntington Beach and the goals and policies of the existing General Plan(1996)" . Comment: Since it is quite obvious to those who travel Huntington Beach Streets this statement needs lots of work;starting with a new Huntington Beach Traffic Model that takes in to account the obvious Impact of the new high density housing traffic increases that seem to have caught everyone off guard!. HB -609- Item 10. - 287 5) Transportation/Traffic: "General Plan Update Goal CIRC-1:The circulation system supports existing,approved, and planned land uses while maintaining a desired level of service and capacity on streets and at critical intersections.". Comment: It isn't happening now so what makes you think it will be alright in the future? You can't keep up with the needs for infrastructure maintenance with robbing peter to pay Paul so how will this be accomplished in the future. Fiscal trends for both city and State would seem to argue for the contrary. What new resources will be made available that don't exist now? 6) Transportation/Traffic: "General Plan Update Goal CIRC-1:The circulation system supports existing, approved, and planned land uses while maintaining a desired level of service and capacity on streets and at critical intersections.". Comment: It isn't happening now so what makes you think it will be alright in the future? You can't keep up with the needs for infrastructure maintenance with robbing peter to pay Paul so haw will this be accomplished In the future. Fiscal trends for both city and State would seem to argue for the contrary. What new resources will be made available that don't exist now? 7) "ERC-15.C: Evaluate participation in Orange County Water District's recycled water program, and explore opportunities for the city to produce Its own recycled water for use within the community." Comment: This is very important;very effort should be made to fully participate in Orange County Water District's recycled water program to the maximum extent possible. 8) "ERC-13.F:Support Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) feasibility studies"Comment: Seriously object to this statement, neither the City Council nor the residents/electorate has authorized such an effort. The City has no role to play in providing and ensuring public utilities. This is presumptuous and needs to be stricken from the EIR and considerations in the General Plan Update unless the Electorate has authorized this new concept for Public Utilities. Comments for Volume-IIII-Appendix-P-Sea Level Rise Vulnerablhty Assessment: 1) This analysis is basically flawed from the outset by using old stale data. For example, it fails to recognize that a rather significant event has occurred in Antarctica on July 17 2017;A new "Trillion-Ton Iceberg broke off the Larson Ice Shelf! Certainly this event has biased and accelerated the Coastal Flooding projected by the Consultant analysis yet they have no mention of this event and its' impact. Ted Ross Huntington Beach Resident Item 10. - 288 HB -610- KVVXXL v. ✓ i a FID -IOV- I RECEIVED September 18, 2017 W7 SEP 18 PM 3: 19 CITY CLERK 17701 Cowan Ave..Suite 200 [nine.CA 92614 C 1 T Y OF 949 250 0909 HUNTINGTON BEACH Fax 949 263 0647 Mayor Barbara DelgIeize and City Council Members City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Comments on Huntington Beach's General Plan Update-Land Use Element Dear Mayor Delgleize and City Council Members, The Kennedy Conunission(the Commission) is a coalition of residents and community organizations that advocates for the production of homes affordable for families earning less than $20,000 aiunually in Orange County. Formed in 2001, the Commission has been successful in partnering with Orange County jurisdictions to create effective housing policies that have led to the new construction of homes affordable to lower income working families. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the City of Huntington Beach's General Plan Update. We have reviewed the draft and are submitting this letter to provide public comments. As the City moves forward with the update,the Commission urges the City to continue its support for the development of affordable homes and consider the following: 1. Revise Goal LU-4 Policy A to read as: Encourage a mix of residential types to accommodate people with diverse housing needs at all income levels. 2. Revise Goal LU-4 Policy E to read as: Encourage housing opportunities for a]l economic segments of the community to be located in proximity to employment to reduce vehicle miles traveled. 3. Include astand-alone policy under Goal LU-4: Encourage the development of affordable homes for lower income households and workers in the City. 4. Ensure the update of the General Plan is consistent with the Housing Element pursuant to Section 65300.5 of the State Government Code. Ranked among the top ten least affordable metropolitan areas in the country, Orange County is suffering from an affordable housing crisis. A resident must earn at least$34.87 per hour to afford a two-bedroom apartment at a fair market rent of$1,81.3 a month.' As rents and the number of residents needing affordable homes have continually increased, the number of affordable homes being built for lower income households has not kept up with the demand. An additional 109,965 affordable rental homes are needed to address Orange County's housing needs for lower income renters.'- 'Out of Reach 2017-The High Cost of Housing.National Law Income Housing Coalition,p,38,2017. Orange County Renters in Crisis:A Call for Action.Calilbrnin Housing Partnership Corporation,p. I.May 2017. HB -61 1- Item 10. - 289 Dear Mayor Delgleize and City Council Members September 18, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Burdened by the high cost of housing,on a single night in January 2017, nearly 4,800 people experienced homelessness in Orange County.' The need to address this crisis is urgent, especially for homeless children. During the 2015 to 2016 school year, 28,450 students in grades Pre-K through 12t" grade were identified as homeless living in unstable envirolurlents in the Orange County school districts.' In addition,according to the recent release of the Cost Study of Homelessness, close to $300 million was spent to address homelessness in Orange County during 2014 to 2015.' Studies have shown that affordable housing coupled with supportive services is a cost-efficient intervention that will safely house individuals experiencing cluonic homelessness. With high housing costs and significant lack of affordable homes, many workers and families, especially those who earn lower wages, struggle financially to live in the city they work in. These impacts not only hurt workers and families but may also impact the city's economic competitiveness and attractiveness to major employers to provide jobs. Locating homes, specifically affordable homes,near transit,job centers and neighborhood services will decrease travel costs and allow individuals to save money and spend it elsewhere in the City. In particular, the environmental impacts of a development are especially less drastic when a person can afford to live and spend their money in the same community in which they work in. In 2017, the average commute time to work for Orange County residents was approximately 30 minutes and approximately 87% of commuters drove alone.'Improving location accessibility and connectivity reduces the dependency for residents, especially for lower income households and workers,to drive their automobiles. This will lead to decreased environmental impacts, such as vehicles miles traveled (VMT)and greenhouse gas emissions, which will contribute to the project's overall purpose and intent to create a sustainable transit oriented neighborhood. The General Plan will also align with the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (SB 375) and help the City implement and comply with SB 375 goals of reducing VMT and greenhouse gas emissions. Please keep us informed of any revisions, updates and meetings regarding the City's General Plan Update. If you have any questions, please contact me at(949)250-0909 or cesarc@kennedycommiss ion.org. Sincerely, Cesar Covarrubias Executive Director Orunge County Point in Time Count 2017.County of Orange,May 2017. 'OC Community Indicators 2017,Children and Families Commission of Orange County,p.34,May 2017. 'Cost Study of Homelessness Executive Summary.Orange County United Way,Jamboree and University ofCalifomin.Irvine,p.2.March 2017. b Profile of Huntington Beach,Southern California Association of GOYertttnents,p.22,May 2017. Item 10. - 290 His -612- Ocean View School D11strict 17200 Pinehurst Lane, su erintendent Board Of Trustees Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Carol Hansen,Ed.D. Gina Clayton-Tarvin,President Tet:714 847-2551 Jack C.Souders,Vice President Fax:714 847-1430 John Briscoe,Clerk Web:www.ovsd.org Joseph Gaglione,Member "Equity and Norm Westwell,Member Excellence" September 15, 2017 VIA EMAIL Mayor Barbara Delgleize and Members of City Council CiTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: City Council Public Hearing 9-18-2017, Item 8 Program Environmental Impact Report No. 14-001 General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 Dear Mayor Barbara Delgleize and Members of the City Council: The Ocean View School District requests that the City Council remove Policy ERC-2 F from the General Plan Update concerning after school hours public access to playgrounds and playing fields that was added by the Planning Commission in its recommendation to the City Council. Policy ERC-2 F reads as follows: Work with the school districts to encourage after school access to playgrounds and playing fields on school properties. There are many reasons why the school district may restrict public access to its properties, including security for facilities, school employees, and students participating in after-hour programs; maintenance cost to facilities and grounds; and prevention of vandalism. Currently, the school district has deemed it necessary to restrict after school public access to several school sites. We request that this policy be removed from the General Plan Update because use of school properties is the sole responsibility and authority of the school district. SUPPLEMENTAL Thank you for your consideration of our request. COMMUNICATION Sincerely, " 4ee8ng Date: -1 Carol Hansen, Ed.D. Agenda Item No.;,,�„� .l Superintendent, Ocean View School District cc: Gina Clayton-Tarvin, President, Ocean View School District Board of Trustees Robin Estanislau, City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach Jennifer Villasenor, Planning Manager, City of Huntington Beach HB -6 i;- Item 10. - 291_ ATTAC H M E N T #4 ATTACHMENT #5 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 1 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR. CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/18/2017 SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Certify Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 14-001 by adopting Resolution No. 2017-40 and approve General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 14- 002 for the comprehensive update to the Huntington Beach General Plan by adopting Resolution No. 2017-41 Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 14-002 and Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 14-001, which is a City-initiated comprehensive update to the Huntington Beach General Plan. The General Plan is the fundamental policy document of the City of Huntington Beach and serves as a policy guide for determining the appropriate physical development and character of Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to year 2040). On August 15, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on GPA No. 14- 002 and EIR No. 14-001 and unanimously recommended approval of the General Plan Update and Program EIR to the City Council with modifications. Financial Impact: Not Applicable. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: A) Certify Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 14-001 by adopting Resolution No. 2017-40, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Certifying Program Environmental Impact Report No. 14-001 for General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 (General Plan Update)" (ATTACHMENT NO. 1); and, B) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 by adopting Resolution No. 2017-41, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 for the General Plan Update" (ATTACHMENT NO. 2); and, C) Approve the CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. (ATTACHMENT NO. 5) Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. Deny Program Environmental Impact Report No. 14-001 and General Plan Amendment No. 14- 002. HB -6 i s- Item 10. - 293 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 2 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 2. Continue Program Environmental Impact Report No. 14-001 and General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Location: Citywide General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 represents a City-initiated request to approve a comprehensive update to the City of Huntington Beach General Plan. This community based General Plan Update includes: - A new Community Vision, 10 Guiding Principles and updated goals, policies and implementation programs; - Streamlining and consolidation of the required General Plan elements, which include Land Use, Circulation, Environmental Resources and Conservation, Natural and Environmental Hazards, Noise and Public Services and Infrastructure; - Internal consistency amongst the General Plan elements; - Updated background data to reflect changed conditions; - Introduction of a new Research and Technology land use designation, which is proposed to highlight and prioritize the City's commitment to job growth and sustained economic vitality; and - A description of development capacity accommodating 7,228 residential units and 5,384,920 square feet of nonresidential uses above existing (2014) conditions over a 25- year period (to year 2040). The General Plan is the fundamental policy document of the City of Huntington Beach and serves as a policy guide for determining the appropriate physical development and character of Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to 2040). It provides the framework for management and utilization of the City's physical and economic resources. The City is updating its General Plan to ensure that the plan remains a useful tool, keeps pace with change, and provides workable solutions to current and future issues. The General Plan Update provides a comprehensive policy framework that reflects growth, resource protection priorities, and recent state legislation, providing a blueprint for future development and resource conservation in Huntington Beach. The General Plan expresses the City's goals and articulates the City's intentions with respect to the rights and expectations of the general public, property owners, community interest groups, prospective investors, and business interests. State Law Requirements Each city and county in California is required to adopt a general plan and update the plan at regular intervals. Sections 65300-65404 and 65590-65590.1 of the California Government Code establish the requirements for the minimum contents of the general plan and rules for adoption and subsequent amendments. Together, these portions of state law and General Plan Guidelines that are prepared and maintained by the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research establish the legal framework for the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update. Under state law, each General Plan must contain at minimum the following seven elements: Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Noise, Open Space, Conservation, and Safety. A General Plan may also contain optional elements to address and emphasize other subjects of local importance. Existinq General Plan Item 10. - 294 HB -616- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 3 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 The City's current General Plan was last comprehensively updated in 1996. The current General Plan contains 16 elements within four chapters. The table below summarizes the various elements of the existing General Plan, where the date of the most comprehensive update is shown and the date of the most recent minor amendment, if any, also is provided in parentheses. Existing General Plan Elements Most Recent Update Community Development Chapter Land Use Element 1996, (amended 2013) Urban Design Element 1996 Historic and Cultural Resources Element 2015 Economic Development Element 1996 Growth Management Element 2002, (amended 2004) Housing Element 2013 Infrastructure and Community Services Chapter Circulation Element 2013 Public Facilities and Public Services Element 1996, (amended 2002) Recreation and Community Services Element 1996, (amended 2012) Utilities Element 1996, (amended 2010) Natural Resources Chapter Environmental Resources/Conservation Element 1996, (amended 2004) Air Quality Element 1996 Coastal Element 2001, (amended 2011) Hazards Chapter Environmental Hazards Element 1996, (amended 2009) Noise Element 1996 Hazardous Materials Element 1996 Draft General Plan Update The draft General Plan Update incorporates components of the 1996 General Plan that are still applicable today, while reducing the number of optional elements and proposing a streamlined approach to the goals and policies. The General Plan Update also establishes a new Research and Technology (RT) land use designation within existing Industrially-designated areas, which highlights and prioritizes the city's commitment to job growth and sustained economic growth and vitality. While the General Plan Update does not change any of the city's existing residential designations or convert existing single-family residential designated areas to another land use, it allows for continued residential growth within the city's current residential areas and established densities of those areas. The General Plan Update does not propose additional Specific Plans or changes to the maximum permitted density and intensity established by each adopted Specific Plan within the City. The General Plan Update also functions as a plan for the management of resources and infrastructure to accommodate projected growth over a 25-year period. General Plan Update Elements The General Plan Update is comprised of the following six elements: Proposed General Plan Update Elements Land Use Element Circulation Element Environmental Resources and Conservation Natural and Environmental Hazards Noise Infrastructure and Public Services The Historic and Cultural Resources, Housing, and Coastal Elements are not a part of this comprehensive General Plan Update. Below is a brief description of each element. H_B -6 i 7- Item 10. - 295 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 4 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 Land Use Element The Land Use Element is a required element pursuant to state planning law and guides future development and designates appropriate locations for different land uses including open spaces, parks, residences, commercial uses, industry, schools, and other public and community-serving uses. Consistent with state law, the Land Use Element establishes standards for residential density and nonresidential building intensity for lands within the planning area. The element also establishes the City's long-term community design and economic development goals related to beach city culture and identity, community form, neighborhoods and districts, economic trends, and job development and retention strategies. Land Use Map As directed by the City Council, minimal land use changes are proposed as part of the General Plan Update. None of the City's existing low density residential (i.e. — single-family residential) areas are proposed to change or convert to another land use designation. In addition, the General Plan Update does not propose changes to established densities of the City's existing residential land use designations. The readability of the land use map, when compared to the existing land use map, is proposed to be improved by simplifying the land use designation annotations, deleting obsolete suffixes, embedding permitted intensity/floor area ratio (FAR) into the land use designation, and providing consistency between the HBZSO and General Plan for the commercial and industrial land use designations (except visitor-serving commercial). Research and Technology Land Use Designation To support economic development goals to attract new incubator and technology-oriented uses, a Research and Technology (RT) land use designation within existing Industrially designated areas along the Gothard Street corridor and within the northwest industrial area south of the Boeing campus bounded by Bolsa Avenue to the north, Bolsa Chica Street to the west, Springdale Street to the east, and Edinger Avenue to the south is proposed to accommodate these types of future uses. The Research and Technology designation would provide a flexible platform for both industrial and commercial uses that do not fit into the city's historically commercial or industrial areas. Many new business types require this flexibility as they may need both commercial and industrial components to conduct business. When assessing Huntington Beach's location, employment, and land use potential, technology manufacturing and technology services industries present high potential for growth. The RT designation would provide for a wide variety of nonresidential mixed-use development and encourage both employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees. Uses may include clean and green manufacturing and industrial uses (e.g., medical devices, clean air technology), research and development uses, technology, warehousing, business parks, professional offices, limited eating and drinking establishments that have an industrial component (e.g., brewery), restaurants and cafes to serve the employment uses and surrounding residential neighborhoods and similar neighborhood commercial uses. Additionally, technology firms will demand newer or refurbished multi-tenant buildings that offer modern, high speed and high bandwidth infrastructure. Therefore, the Land Use Element identifies goals and policies that will focus on promoting development of a strong inventory of adequately improved and competitive industrial buildings within these areas that provide the resources and technological capacity desired by businesses in this industry. Development Capacity Item 10. - 296 HB -61 s- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 5 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 The Land Use Element establishes a development capacity for the City over a 25-year period (to 2040). The General Plan Update accommodates an additional 7,228 dwelling units and 5,384,920 square feet of non-residential uses over 2014 conditions. Circulation Element The Circulation Element is a required element of the General Plan, and pursuant to state planning law, defines the transportation network and describes how people move throughout the planning area, including the streets, railways, transit routes, bicycle paths, and sidewalks. The transportation network is a major determinant of development form and land use. Factors such as, but not limited to, traffic patterns and congestion, access to transit, and ease and safety of walking and biking may determine where people choose to live, work, and visit. The Circulation Element was comprehensively updated in 2013. As such, changes to the Circulation Element are minimal consisting of mostly updating figures and exhibits and addressing new components of state law. Environmental Resources and Conservation Element The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element is a required element of the General Plan and meets the Open Space and Conservation Element requirements of state planning law. The Environmental Resources and Conservation Element describes the conservation, development, and use of natural resources (including open space), as well as parks and recreation opportunities, in Huntington Beach. This element also addresses key issues related to environmental resources and conservation, including biological resource areas, energy and water conservation, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and coastal resources. Natural and Environmental Hazards Element The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element meets the mandated Safety Element requirements of state planning law. Consistent with state law, the Natural and Environmental Hazards Element identifies areas prone to natural hazards and potentially hazardous conditions including ground shaking and surface rupture from earthquakes; ground failure; tsunami, seiche, and dam failure; slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides; subsidence, liquefaction, and other geologic hazards; flooding; urban fires; hazardous materials; and evacuation routes. Noise Element The Noise Element is a required General Plan element and, consistent with state law, describes the existing noise environment in Huntington Beach, identifies noise sources and problems affecting community safety and comfort, and establishes policies and programs that limit community exposure to excessive noise levels. The Noise Element sets standards for acceptable noise levels by various land uses and provides guidance for how to balance the noise created by an active and economically healthy community with the community's desire for peace and quiet. Public Services and Infrastructure Element The Public Services and Infrastructure Element is an optional element that describes the water delivery system, wastewater collection and treatment system, stormwater and urban runoff, solid waste disposal, electricity, communications, and infrastructure finance. This element also identifies plans for preparing for health and safety hazards, including police protection, fire protection, marine safety, emergency response and preparedness, and airport safety. Although the Public Services and Infrastructure is an optional element, public services/infrastructure was identified as a top priority of the community and the GPAC during the General Plan Update process. Therefore, consistent with City Council direction, this optional element is included in the General Plan Update. Each element is organized into the following sections: ■ Introduction and Purpose: This section describes the purpose and scope of the element, and specifies the relationship of the element to other elements in the General Plan. HB -6 19- Item 10. - 297 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 6 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 ■ Plan: This section provides important background information and key trends that provide a strategic basis for city policy. Many of the elements illustrate various opportunities, constraints, classifications, policies, and standards in either graphic or tabular form. For example, the Land Use Element contains a Land Use Map and a Land Use Plan that identify and describe the locations of future uses by type, density, and intensity. ■ Issues, Goals, and Policies: This section identifies the most important community issues related to the element topic. For each issue, goals are identified to provide direction by stating a desired future end state. Policies are identified as guides for the City Council, Planning Commission, and City staff when reviewing development proposals and making other decisions that affect future development and conservation. Policies represent a commitment by the City to pursue a particular course of action, or to take action in the future consistent with the direction stated in the related goal. Policies are presented as written statements, tables, diagrams, and maps. All of these components must be considered together when making planning decisions. ■ Implementation Programs: Implementation Programs describe how the City will implement identified goals and policies. Unless otherwise stated, all policies are to be implemented on an as-appropriate or as-feasible basis, considering surrounding physical and environmental context and financial resources. The implementation programs are located in Chapter VIII, Implementation of the General Plan Update. Elements Not Included in General Plan Update Housing Element: The Housing Element is a required element of the General Plan and serves as a policy guide to address the housing needs of the residents of Huntington Beach. The element outlines housing needs, barriers or constraints to providing housing, and actions proposed to address these concerns over an eight-year period. The most recent Housing Element was adopted in 2013 and anticipates housing needs within Huntington Beach from 2013 through 2021. The Housing Element is not a part of the General Plan Update as it is on a separate schedule pursuant to state housing element law. The next Housing Element update will begin in 2020. Coastal Element: The Coastal Element addresses the requirements of the California Coastal Act within the portions of Huntington Beach that are located within the Coastal Zone. Goals and policies in this element guide civic decisions regarding growth, development, enhancement, and preservation of coastal resources. This element will be updated after adoption of the General Plan Update and is subject to approval by the California Coastal Commission. Historic and Cultural Resources Element: This element was recently comprehensively updated in 2015 and, as such, is not considered a part of the General Plan Update. However, upon adoption of the General Plan Update, it will be reformatted to be consistent with the format of the General Plan Update. Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 14-001 analyzes the potential environmental effects of the General Plan Update. The draft Program Environmental Impact Report discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of aesthetics and visual resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology, soils, and mineral resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise and vibration, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, and utilities and services systems. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposed General Plan Update are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. The EIR consists of three volumes. Volume I consists of the Technical Background Report, which includes supporting information for the draft EIR and also discusses the regulatory framework. Volume II is the Draft Program EIR and contains the environmental analysis and the discussion and analysis of project alternatives. Volume III contains the Appendices. Volumes I through III were Item 10. - 298 HB -620- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 7 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 circulated for a minimum 45-day public review period. The Final EIR, which includes the comments received during the public review period, responses to those comments and text changes to the Draft EIR to clarify or correct information in response to comments or as identified as necessary by staff, is provided in Chapters eight through 10 of the Draft Program EIR/ Volume II. Chapters eight through 11 of the Final EIR are provided in Attachment No. 4. B. BACKGROUND As mentioned, the City's existing General Plan consists of 16 elements and was last comprehensively updated in 1996. In October 2013, the City Council approved a contract and budget to retain PMC, Inc., now Michael Baker International, to assist the City with the General Plan Update. The City Council also provided direction on the makeup of the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) and the type and makeup of various task forces to be convened during the General Plan Update process. Below is a timeline of the General Plan Update process and a listing of various public meetings that have occurred over the course of the project. Community Visioning Task Force Meetings Stakeholder Interviews 1/30-31/14 Biological Resources 1/29/14 & 7/17/1 Beach bonfire 3/19/14 Sea Level Rise 2/12/14 & 1/21/15 Community Workshop 3/27/14 GHG/Sustainability 3/13/14 & 7/15/14 Community Workshop 3/29/14 Market Trends 10/15/14 Pop-Up Workshop 4/19/14 Circulation 2/22/17 City Council GPAC Meetings Planning Commission Study Sessions & Meetings Study Sessions & Hearings 9/2/14 3/26/14 7/22/14 1/20/15 6/4/14 6/23/15 3/16/15 8/6/14 7/6/15 (joint SS w/ City Council) 7/6/15 9/10/14 1/24/17 1/17/17 1/21/15 6/13/17 8/21/17 4/1/15 6/27/17 6/3/15 7/11/17 EIR Meetings 7/25/17 10/21/15 8/8/17 6/7/17 8/15/17 (public hearing) In addition to the meetings listed, a number of other meetings, events and public outreach efforts occurred throughout the process. The City made presentations to various groups such as a homeowners' association and city boards and committees at their regular meetings, attended community events to publicize the General Plan Update, and conducted online surveys. In March 2015, the City Council directed staff to streamline the General Plan Update including reducing the amount of optional elements and condensing the overall General Plan to the extent feasible while still complying with state law. In July 2015, the General Plan Update project team presented goals and policies that were reviewed by the GPAC and land use alternatives for several opportunity areas identified in the economic conditions and market trends report prepared for the General Plan Update to the City Council. The City Council recommended minimal land use map changes. The land use map changes directed by the City Council are limited to properties along the Gothard corridor and within the Northwest Industrial area and reflected in the proposed Research and Technology designation on the draft General Plan Map. Changes to the May 2017 Draft General Plan Update On May 22, 2017, the draft General Plan Update was made available for public review in conjunction with the associated draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Since the public HB -621- Item 10. - 299 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 8 of 18 Meeting Date:9/18/2017 review draft was made available, a number of changes have been made to the document. The changes represent edits made by staff to clean up typos or inadvertent errors in the text, changes as a result of the responses to comments from the public on the draft General Plan Update and Program EIR and changes made by the Planning Commission during the public hearing on August 15, 2017. The changes are shown in sty keeut underline format in Attachment No. 3. Only pages that have changed since the May 2017, draft was made available are included. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION: On August 15, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the General Plan Update and Program EIR. During the meeting, staff presented an overview of the draft General Plan and Program EIR. Four members of the public spoke during the public hearing portion of the meeting. One speaker, representing the Ocean View School District, expressed support for the changes made to the General Plan Update as a result of the district's comment letters and thanked the City for addressing their concerns. One speaker spoke in opposition to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program (GGRP), which is part of the Program EIR, being used as mitigation and suggested that the City not adopt the GGRP as mitigation. It should be noted that the GGRP is not considered mitigation for the General Plan Update, and thus, is not necessary to be adopted as mitigation. The next speaker spoke regarding the future of retail zoning, housing needs in the City, autonomous vehicles and the proposed Research and Technology designation. The final speaker, representing the Building Industry Association of Orange County, raised concerns that the number of dwelling units identified in the General Plan and Program EIR is too low and does not reflect the current and future housing demand. After the public hearing was closed, the Planning Commission discussed the Program EIR and made several changes to mitigation measures, which have been incorporated into the draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and are included in Attachment No. 4. The Planning Commission then discussed the draft General Plan Update at length and made many changes to the document through straw votes. The changes made by the Planning Commission are reflected in the recommended action and provided as Attachment No. 3 to this report. It should be noted that the changes made by the Planning Commission to the draft General Plan and mitigation measures of the Program EIR did not affect the impact conclusions or trigger new environmental impacts that had not been previously identified. Planning Commission Action on August 15, 2017: The motion made by Scandura, seconded by Crowe, to recommend certification of Program EIR No. 14-001 with modifications to the City Council as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by approving draft City Council Resolution No. 2017-40 and forward to the City Council for adoption carried by the following vote: AYES: Crowe, Garcia, Grant, Kalmick, Mandic, Ray, Scandura NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED The motion made by Scandura, seconded by Kalmick, to approve General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 by approving draft City Council Resolution No. 2017-41, which includes the CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Consideration and forward to the City Council for adoption carried by the following vote: AYES: Crowe, Garcia, Grant, Kalmick, Mandic, Ray, Scandura NOES: None ABSENT: None Item 10. - 300 RB -622- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 9 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 ABSTAIN: None MOTION PASSED D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The proposed General Plan Update has been prepared to be consistent with state law requirements related to General Plans (Sections 65300-65404 and 65590-65590.1 of the California Government Code). The General Plan Update incorporates legislation that has been enacted since 1996 and resolves an existing inconsistency between the Land Use Element and the Circulation Element, for which consistency is required pursuant to state law. Additionally, the General Plan Update reflects the Community Vision and Guiding Principles, which are located in the Introduction chapter of the General Plan Update and provide a foundation for the goals and policies of the General Plan. The community vision was crafted by the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) and the project team (City staff and consultants) based on input gathered during an early community engagement phase of the project. The guiding principles, which support the community vision, were created through the work of the GPAC and reviewed by the City Council early in the General Plan Update process. The goals and policies within the General Plan Update largely represent the work of the GPAC through an extensive review undertaken during their meetings in 2015. Finally, the General Plan Update reflects the March 2015 City Council direction to streamline the General Plan Update including reducing the amount of optional elements and condensing the overall General Plan to the extent feasible while still complying with state law. The following is a discussion of changes and new topics that are addressed in the proposed General Plan Update that warrant further discussion and analysis. Land Use Map/Research and Technology Designation As directed by the City Council, minimal land use changes are proposed as part of the General Plan Update. None of the City's existing low density residential (i.e. — single-family residential) areas are proposed to change or convert to another land use designation. In addition, the General Plan Update does not propose changes to established densities of the City's existing residential land use designations. The readability of the land use map, when compared to the existing land use map, is proposed to be improved by simplifying the land use designation annotations, deleting obsolete suffixes, embedding permitted intensity/floor area ratio (FAR) into the land use designation, and providing consistency between the HBZSO and General Plan for the commercial and industrial land use designations (except visitor-serving commercial). One new land use designation is proposed within existing Industrial-designated areas. The new Research and Technology (RT) land use designation is proposed to permit a wide variety of nonresidential mixed-use development in industrial areas along the Gothard Street corridor (from south of Edinger Avenue to Ellis Avenue) and within the northwest industrial areas (south of the Boeing campus and specific plan area) that are undergoing or poised for transformation to support changing employment demand. A copy of the proposed General Plan Land Use Map is provided in Attachment No. 7. The RT designation encourages employment uses and commercial uses designed to accommodate employees while continuing to allow traditional industrial uses such as manufacturing and production. Associated goals and policies of the Land Use Element, in recognition of the growth potential in the RT areas, set the framework for the City to support business retention and growth; support and improve technology infrastructure to meet the needs of existing and potential future businesses; encourage and assist existing and potential future property owners to update, modernize and expand their properties; and provide incentives to retain, expand, and capture new businesses, including research and development industries and start-ups. The RT area would provide a flexible platform for both industrial and commercial uses that do not fit into the City's historically commercial or industrial areas. Many new business types require this flexibility as they may need both commercial and industrial components to conduct business and grow a business. HB -623- Item 10. - 301 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 10 of 18 Meeting Date:9/18/2017 The intent of the Research and Technology designation is not to limit existing uses, but to expand what existing and new uses can do within their space. While the exact list of permitted uses would be detailed in a forthcoming amendment to the zoning code, the Research and Technology description, as proposed in the Land Use Element, is broad enough to cover a wide range of uses. Most existing uses could fit within the RT description, as the uses in the proposed RT areas have naturally transitioned to lighter industrial uses over time. In addition, based on an inventory of existing uses in the Gothard RT area collected in July 2017, very few uses, if any, would become nonconforming with a re-designation to RT. However, this issue would be more appropriately discussed and vetted through the establishment of the RT zoning district and associated land use controls and development standards, which would require outreach to the businesses and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. It should also be noted that if a use becomes nonconforming as a result of the new RT land use designation and subsequent zoning, a business will still be able to remain in operation as well as change ownership, make improvements to the site and building, legally obtain building permits and certificates of occupancy, and make additions to the structures on the property as allowed pursuant to Chapter 236 of the HBZSO. Development Capacity The General Plan Update establishes a development capacity of an additional 7,228 dwelling units and 5,384,920 square feet of nonresidential uses in the City over a 25-year period (to year 2040). The development capacity represents the realistic amount of development anticipated in the City based on the distribution of land uses reflected on the General Plan Land Use Map (Figure LU-2 of the Land Use Element). The development capacity is not a target or goal for development of the City. Of the 7,228 units, approximately 2,000 units account for units permitted under the existing zoning and remaining residential development capacities for the Holly Seacliff, Downtown, and Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plans. In addition, since the baseline number of 78,175 units was established at the onset of the General Plan Update process, approximately 3,000 units have been completed or permitted in the City that would be counted toward the 7,228 units. The remaining approximately 2,228 units could be developed throughout the City in accordance with the residential permitted uses and densities established on the General Plan Land Use Map through the 2040 horizon year of the General Plan Update. This equates to an approximate average of 100 units per year over the remaining 22-year period. This is a modest amount of residential development given that the City has averaged approximately 320 units a year over the previous 20- year period. Even when adding in the units permitted pursuant to existing adopted specific plans, this would equate to an approximate average of 200 units per year, which is still well below the previous 20-year average. In addition, it is worth noting that the City has permitted less than 100 units in only five of the last 20 years and less than 200 units in only seven of the last 20 years. Although the residential development capacity of the General Plan Update provides for a conservative amount of residential growth, it represents the increasingly built out nature of the City and the anticipated slowing of residential development in the future, therefore, reflecting a realistic and reasonable residential development capacity. The nonresidential development capacity reflects anticipated development as permitted by the nonresidential land uses and intensities of the General Plan Land Use Map. The anticipated development capacity largely accommodates growth in the City's commercial and industrial areas as supported by the goals and policies of the Land Use Element that provide for enhancing the City's tourism and hospitality sector and focused revitalization within the new Research and Technology designated areas. Traffic and Circulation The proposed development capacity anticipated by the General Plan, in conjunction with regional growth, will result in increases in traffic in the City over time. The Circulation Element of the General Plan Update is required to address how the transportation needs of the community will be Item 10. - 302 HB -624- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 11 of 18 Meeting Date:9/18/2017 met based on assumptions about the amount of development that could occur within the City from implementation of the Land Use Map and the goals and policies of the Land Use Element. The Circulation Element includes an Arterial Highway Plan, which shows the planned layout of the City's roadway network and is designed to accommodate the 2040 build out of the General Plan. The Circulation Element also includes performance standards for citywide level of service for traffic signal controlled intersections during peak hours. The General Plan Update Program EIR analyzed the potential traffic impacts of the development capacity on the proposed Arterial Highway Plan. As indicated in the Circulation Element and Program EIR, the anticipated development capacity could result in the addition of approximately 148,000 average daily trips on the City's roads, which equates to an approximate nine percent increase over existing (2014) conditions. According to the Program EIR, this increase in traffic can be adequately accommodated by the Arterial Highway Plan for most of the City's intersections. In addition to the intersection improvements necessary for buildout of the Arterial Highway Plan, the Program EIR recommends intersection improvements at the Beach Boulevard/Heil Avenue, Brookhurst Street/Adams Avenue, and Gothard Street/Center Avenue intersections. With implementation of improvements at these intersections, acceptable levels of service consistent with the goals and policies of the Circulation Element would be achieved. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program Since the last General Plan was adopted in 1996, various state laws have been enacted to address climate change and greenhouse gases (GHGs) at the state level including SB 97, which was enacted in 2007 and requires analysis of greenhouse gas emissions as part of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review process. AB 97 also allows lead agencies to prepare qualified greenhouse gas reduction plans to address a community's greenhouse gas emissions at the programmatic level enabling future projects to tier from the plan and undergo a streamlined CEQA process. Many cities adopt these plans as Climate Action Plans or Sustainability Action Plans, which are typically stand-alone documents that include various measures the agency will implement or require to be implemented by future project applicants. At the onset of the General Plan Update, the City Council directed staff to prepare a stand-alone citywide Sustainability Action Plan, with measures committing the City to reducing greenhouse gas emissions consistent with state reduction targets. In March 2015, the City Council directed staff to reduce the scope of the Sustainability Action Plan and comply with the minimum requirements of CEQA while still realizing the streamlining benefits of a qualified greenhouse gas reduction plan. As such, consistent with the amended CEQA guidelines, the analysis in the Program EIR includes an inventory and forecast of the City's GHG emissions and a greenhouse gas reduction program (GGRP), which establishes a comprehensive approach to reduce GHG emissions in line with state reduction targets through voluntary strategies that emphasize economic viability and that are consistent with community priorities. It establishes existing, projected and target levels of GHG emissions for Huntington Beach and shows how the community can achieve the targets if the identified strategies are implemented, thereby, meeting the requirements of CEQA Guidelines section 15183.5(b). There are no current state or federal laws requiring the City to implement the greenhouse gas reduction strategies and measures identified in the GGRP. To that end, implementation of the GGRP is considered voluntary and the degree to which the City pursues each strategy remains a policy decision. It should be noted that because the City has taken this approach, the impact analysis in the Program EIR concludes that GHG emission impacts are significant and unavoidable as there is no certainty that the City will achieve reductions consistent with state targets through voluntary implementation. As noted previously in this report, the City may still adopt the General Plan Update even with finding that there will be significant and unavoidable impacts as defined by CEQA as long as it adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations, which describes that the benefits of the General Plan Update project to the City outweigh its potential significant and unavoidable impacts. HB -625- Item 10. - 303 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 12 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 Coastal Hazards The Natural and Environmental Hazards Element includes a section to address Coastal Hazards, describing the City's potential risks from high tides, high surf, flooding and coastal erosion, which currently occur, and how these hazards may be exacerbated if sea level rise occurs as projected. One of the technical studies prepared for the General Plan Update includes a sea level rise vulnerability assessment. This assessment models the City's risks under various scenarios and assesses the City's vulnerability in accordance with adopted Coastal Commission guidance. The sea level rise vulnerability assessment is discussed in the Coastal Hazards section and it is acknowledged that there is an inherent degree of uncertainty in sea level rise projections. In addition to the vulnerability assessment, a draft Coastal Resiliency Program has been prepared, in accordance with adopted Coastal Commission guidance, and outlines strategies the City can implement in the future to minimize potential impacts from sea level rise. The coastal resiliency program is a stand-alone document intended to serve as a bridge document between the General Plan and a future update to the City's Local Coastal Program, which will more fully address the topic of sea level rise as required by the Coastal Commission. In terms of how sea level rise and coastal hazards are addressed in the General Plan Update, Figure HAZ-6 (page 5-12) includes a map identifying potential sea level rise hazard areas in the year 2050, which indicates that there is no certainty that sea level rise will occur in the areas projected on the map. Policies HAZ-2.A through H provide that the City will promote appropriate land uses and development patterns in potential sea level rise risk areas, implement priority measures to reduce and mitigate potential impacts to property and infrastructure, continue to support sand replenishment projects, provide information to property owners about coastal hazard risks, monitor potential ocean surf line hazards, provide sufficient warning and evacuation assistance to community members impacts by coastal flooding events, and increase the City's understanding of potential vulnerabilities to infrastructure and increase funding for improvements accordingly. As described, the policies included in the General Plan related to sea level rise more generally address coastal hazards as a whole and do not place additional restrictions on property owners consistent with City Council direction. Program EIR The EIR provides a detailed analysis of potential impacts associated with the General Plan Update. It is intended to serve as an informational document for decision makers. The General Plan Update EIR identifies significant or potentially significant environmental effects, as well as ways in which those impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels, whether through the goals and policies of the General Plan Update, mitigation measures (MMs), or through the implementation of alternatives to the project. In a practical sense, EIRs function as a technique for fact-finding, allowing future applicants, concerned citizens, and staff an opportunity to collectively review and evaluate baseline conditions and project impacts through a process of full disclosure. The General Plan Update EIR has been prepared as a Program EIR consistent with Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, which examines the environmental impacts of a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project and are related either: geographically; as logical parts in the chain of contemplated actions; in connection with issuance of rules, regulations, plans, or other general criteria to govern the conduct of a continuing program; or as individual activities carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory authority and having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in similar ways. The series of actions analyzed in the EIR is the potential future development within the City during the 25-year horizon of the General Plan Update, to year 2040. While the analysis identifies the potential impacts that would result from implementation of growth anticipated by the General Plan Update, the level of analysis does not contain detail to the level of site specificity, nor is it intended Item 10. - 304 HB -626- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 13 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 to be accurate to this level of specificity. The analysis within the EIR identifies a range of potential impacts resulting from future development that would be allowed under the General Plan Update and mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts. Any proposal for future development within the City must be reviewed for consistency with the General Plan Update. As addressed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), (1) if a later activity would have effects not analyzed in the EIR (to include both the draft EIR and the Final EIR), a new Initial Study would need to be prepared leading to a Negative Declaration/ Mitigated Negative Declaration or EIR, or (2) if the lead agency finds that, pursuant to Section 15162, no new effects could occur or no new mitigation measures are required, the agency can approve the project as being within the scope of the General Plan Update EIR and no new environmental documentation would be required. Thus, the City, as the lead agency, could rely on this EIR in conjunction with its consideration of subsequent project development, as deemed appropriate and consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Scope of EIR Analysis The EIR evaluated impacts in the topical areas of: Air Quality, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology, Soils and Mineral Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Noise, Population, Housing and Employment, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation and Traffic, and Utilities and Service System. No impacts to Agricultural and Forestry Resources were determined and therefore, the EIR does not provide further analysis of this issue. A summary of key issues and mitigation measures resulting from the EIR analysis is provided in the August 15, 2017, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No. 8). A complete listing of the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program provided in Attachment No. 4. A detailed description of the EIR process as well as a description of the significant impacts is provided below in the Environmental Status section of this report. Alternatives to the Proposed Project Section 15126.6(a) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR describe a range of reasonable alternatives to a project or to the location of a project that could feasibly attain the basic project objectives as proposed, while reducing significant impacts identified. An EIR is not required to consider every alternative conceivable; rather, it must consider a range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making and public participation. The EIR analyzed three alternatives, which are described below. Alternative 1: No Project Alternative This alternative assumes the continued implementation of the existing 1996 General Plan. Under this alternative, the existing General Plan land uses would remain in place and development in the City would occur in a reasonable manner as allowed by the land use plan and goals and policies of the existing General Plan. Development under this alternative would result in a different buildout compared to the buildout of the proposed General Plan Update. The No Project Alternative would result in a greater number of residential units when compared to the General Plan Update but a lesser amount of nonresidential square footage compared to the General Plan Update as described in the table below. General Plan Update Alternative 1 2040 buildout 2040 buildout Residential Units 85,403 units 86,499 units Nonresidential buildout 50,410,990 square feet 45,748,000 square feet HB -627- Item 1.0. - 305 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 14 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 Impacts under this alternative would be similar to the impact conclusions of the General Plan Update, although to a lesser extent. The significant and unavoidable impact to utilities/water supply identified for the General Plan Update would be greater under this alternative due to the increase in the number of residential units anticipated when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. Alternative 2: Full Implementation of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program (GGRP Alternative) Under this alternative, the City would implement the entirety of the draft GGRP, which is currently proposed as a voluntary program as part of the General Plan Update. The draft GGRP contains a suite of strategies capable of reducing the City's GHG emissions to levels at or below the following, which are consistent with the state's long-term GHG reduction goals: • 2020 GHG reduction target 1,234,260 MTCO2e • 2040 GHG reduction target 575,990 MTCO2e Under this alternative, the draft GGRP would no longer be voluntary and instead would be a required implementation action and undertaken in its entirety, as part of approval of the General Plan Update. The GGRP Alternative would eliminate one of the significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the General Plan Update and is considered the environmentally superior alternative. Alternative 3: Gothard Corridor Land Use Change (Gothard Corridor Alternative) The Gothard Corridor Alternative assumes that all land uses within the Gothard Corridor would be changed from an Industrial land use designation to the new Research and Technology land use designation proposed under the General Plan Update. Under this Alternative, approximately 146 additional acres of land designated as Industrial would be changed to Research and Technology. As a result of this land use change, it is assumed that an additional approximately 990,000 additional square feet of nonresidential development would be anticipated. The Gothard Corridor Alternative would result in increased noise and greenhouse gas emission impacts when compared to the proposed impacts associated with the General Plan Update as a result of increased vehicle trips and emissions due to anticipated increased development potential. However, the impact conclusion of significant and unavoidable would remain the same as identified for the proposed General Plan Update. Statement of Overriding Considerations Environmental impacts associated with implementation of a project may not always be mitigated to a level considered less than significant. In such cases, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be prepared prior to approval of a project, and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093. Because implementation of the proposed project would create significant unavoidable impacts as described above in the areas of Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise and Utilities (Water Supply), a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) is required to describe the specific reasons for approving a project (in this case the General Plan Update), based on information contained within the Final EIR, as well as any other information in the public record. The SOC is included as an exhibit to the draft City Council Resolution certifying the Program EIR and is provided in Attachment No. 5. Public Comments on the Draft EIR and Errata Changes During the public review period, the City of Huntington Beach received a total of 11 comment letters on the EIR: one from a state agency, six from local agencies and organizations including one from the Environmental Board, and four from individuals. The City also received 13 comment letters on the General Plan Update during the comment period and four draft EIR comment letters after the close of the comment period. In response to the comments received, the final EIR includes text changes for the purpose of clarification or correction. The text changes do not change the Item 10. - 306 HB -628- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 15 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 conclusions of the EIR analysis. All of the comments are adequately addressed in the Response to Comments (Attachment No. 4). Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending certification of Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 14-001 because it adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project, identifies project alternatives, provides mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts, and has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). E. SUMMARY As discussed in this report, the General Plan Update has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of state law related to General Plans and updates the City's 21-year old existing General Plan. Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending approval of the General Plan Update for the following reasons: - Incorporates state legislation enacted since the previous (1996) General Plan was adopted; - Provides for consistency among the required elements; - Resolves an inconsistency between the Circulation Element and the Land Use Element; - Is consistent with the March 2015 City Council direction to streamline the General Plan and reduce the number of optional elements while still complying with state law; - Reflects the Community Vision and Guiding Principles as established by the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) based on community input; - Provides for economic and social benefits to improve the quality of life for the City's residents that outweigh the adverse environmental effects of the Plan; - Establishes a development capacity and policy framework for determining the appropriate physical development and character of Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to 2040); and - Updates the goals and policies to ensure the General Plan remains a useful tool for the future in guiding City decisions regarding land use, the design and/or character of buildings and open spaces, the conservation of existing housing and the provision of new dwelling units, the provision of supporting infrastructure and public services, the protection of environmental resources, the allocation of fiscal resources, and the protection of residents from natural and human-caused hazards. Environmental Status: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Program EIR No. 14-001 was prepared by Atkins to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update as well as identify appropriate mitigation measures. The Draft EIR was distributed to the Planning Commission for review at the start of the 45-day public comment period on May 22, 2017. The Final Draft Program EIR, including the Response to Comments and all text changes as a result of the public comment period was distributed electronically to the Planning Commission and posted on the City's website on August 4, 2017. The required CEQA procedure that was followed is outlined below: October 8, 2015 A Notice of Preparation was filed with the State Clearinghouse to notify public of intent to prepare an EIR. October 8, 2015 to November 6, Notice of Preparation available for 30 day public review and comment 2015 period. October 21, 2015 A Public Scoping Meeting was held to solicit comments and issue areas to be studied in the EIR. HB -629- Item 10. - 307 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 16 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 May 19, 2017 A Notice of Completion was filed with the State Clearinghouse. May 22, 2017 to July 7, 2017 Draft EIR available for public review and comment for forty-five days. June 7, 2017 A Public Comment Meeting was held to solicit comments on the adequacy of the Draft EIR. August 4, 2017 Final EIR is made available to the public and organizations, agencies and individuals that commented on the draft EIR August 15, 2017 Public hearing before Planning Commission to recommend certification of Program EIR No. 14-001 to the City Council. Through the use of mitigation measures identified in the EIR and the goals and policies proposed in the draft General Plan Update, most of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. However, there are five areas for which significant adverse environmental impacts anticipated that cannot be eliminated through mitigation measures. The significant adverse environmental impacts are as follows: Air Quality Project Specific — Due to the speculative nature of estimating emissions of individual projects at the programmatic level of the General Plan Update, emissions cannot be quantified (as there is no project level data) to establish whether the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds would be exceeded. As such, the EIR concludes that the project would result in a significant and unavoidable impact due to the violation of an air quality standard and exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Cumulative — Due to the speculative nature of estimating emissions of individual projects at the programmatic level of the General Plan Update, emissions cannot be quantified (as there is no project level data) to establish whether the SCAQMD thresholds would be exceeded in a region determined to be in nonattainment. Therefore, the EIR concludes that the General Plan Update could result in a cumulative contribution to an air quality impact and the impact is significant and unavoidable. Cultural Resources Cumulative — Because it is currently infeasible to determine whether future development under the General Plan Update would result in the demolition or removal of historical, archaeological, and paleontological resources within the planning area, the incremental contribution of the General Plan Update to the cumulative effects could be cumulatively considerable and therefore, the EIR concludes that this would result in a significant and unavoidable impact to cultural resources. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative — The EIR includes an analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a result of the General Plan Update and includes a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program (GGRP), which identifies strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to below state reduction targets. However, the General Plan Update does not propose to implement the GGRP as the City is not mandated by laws or regulations to do so. To that end, there is no certainty that GHG emissions would be reduced to levels in line state targets and the impact is concluded to be significant and unavoidable. Item 10. - 308 HB -630- Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 17 of 18 Meeting Date: 9/18/2017 Noise Project Specific and Cumulative — The General Plan Update would result in an increase in average daily trips (ADT) associated with future development, increasing ambient roadway noise levels across the City, some of which would exceed established thresholds. As the increase in ambient noise levels is vehicle related, there are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce ambient noise levels and exposure below the identified thresholds. Thus, the General Plan Update would result in a significant and unavoidable noise impact. In addition to increases in ambient noise levels due to roadway noise, future development under the General Plan Update has the potential to generate construction vibration levels exceeding established thresholds at nearby sensitive receptors (i.e. — those within 50 feet of pile driving activities). Although future development would comply with General Plan policies and proposed mitigation measures to reduce impacts, vibration levels would not be reduced to a level of less than significant. Therefore, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Utilities (Water Supply) Project Specific and Cumulative — Given the uncertainty of water supply across the western United States and throughout the state of California, a future supply deficit would result in a significant and unavoidable impact. Notwithstanding the adoption and implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, approval of the General Plan Update requires that a Statement of Overriding Considerations be adopted by the City Council, finding that the economic, technological, social or other benefits of the project outweigh its potentially unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. Prior to certification and adoption of the EIR, the City Council may amend the document. It should be noted, that removal of any of the recommended mitigation measures will require findings and justification. Strategic Plan Goal: The General Plan is a policy document that guides City decisions and use of the City's resources through the year 2040. The goals and policies in the General Plan address a range of issues in the City and are intended to implement the community's vision and guiding principles. As such, the goals and policies of the proposed General Plan Update align with all of the City's identified strategic plan goals as follows: Improve quality of life; Enhance and maintain infrastructure; Strengthen economic and financial sustainability; Enhance and maintain public safety; and Enhance and maintain City service delivery. Attachment(s): 1. City Council Resolution No. 2017-40, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Certifying Program Environmental Impact Report No. 14-001 for General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 (General Plan Update) 2. City Council Resolution No. 2017-41, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 for the General Plan Update 3. Public Hearing Draft General Plan Update, September 2017 — Only pages proposed to change from the May 2017 draft General Plan Update are attached 4. Final EIR — Chapters 8 through 11 of Volume 11 5. CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations KB -631- Item 10. - 309 Dept. ID CD 17-011 Page 18 of 18 Meeting Date:9/18/2017 6. Public Comments Received on the draft General Plan Update 7. General Plan Land Use Map (Figure LU-2 of the Land Use Element) B. Planning Commission Staff Report, August 15, 2017 — Environmental Impact Report No. 14- 001 and General Plan Amendment No. 14-002 Item 10. - 310 HB -632- ATTACHMENT #6 9/18/2017 General Plan Approach * Directed by City Council in March 2015 * Streamline the General Plan structure to meet minimum legal requirements * Condense the existing 16 elements into 9 • Technical analysis to address minimum state law and responsible agency requirements COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: �~��/% H B - 6 3.3- Itern 10. - 311 Agenda Item No., L/ 9/18/2017 Draft 6eneral Plan • Released May 2017 • Complies with recent changes to state law • Provides consistency among elements • Updates background data to reflect changed conditions including 11 technical studies • Has been prepared based on input from community, task forces, GPAC, Planning Commission and City Council R.-- Item 10. - 312 HB -634- 2 9/18/2017 Planning Area R 81 C�r(a 8 n y City Limits (17,482 acres) mr. e Includes Sunset Beach and Brightwater annexations"" Fwnunnva+m-x Y Sphere of Influence (1,489 acres) r Includes Bolsa Ghica Wetlands j and Goodell property A b ,wsM aa� � e f Planning Area (18,971 acres) O O LEQEMD A` �bn1fM cc"O z HB _6;5_ Item 10. - 313 9/18/2017 Land Use Map • Introduces a new Research and Technology land use designation in existing areas designated as Industrial • No change to existing residential designations • No change to existing residential densities • Denotes 15 existing adopted specific plans with a specific plan overlay suffix (—sp) • No changes to existing specific gfans MW IMAM L Table LU_1 l General Plan Distribution l lo''flLand Uses I t ( 1 I RestdMtlel ' Low Densty 5,653.2 29.8Sry Medium Density 1,160 4521% _ Medium High Density _ 1 U471 5.5% High Density 180.7 0.95%� Commercial Nelglbontood 90.9 0.40% General 246.9 14% Visitor 155.7 a9% Me 16.3 0.1% Mixed Use Mixed Use 531.9 3.4% Industrial Research and Technology 4732 2.5% Industrial 854.6 3.5% Open ,t;pace,and Recreational Carperwaton f 551.9 8.8% Park 701.1 3 7% Retxea9M 237.9 1.3% _ WaterRecrea9an 2397 1.3li '_� Store 434J 2.3% _ W�PM—d CaelttWj Spntfea Public 8357 4.4% tsn Publk Bem�ubiC *27 4.1% Total 18,971.8' 100% _ �r&Mrrr.yroewdwdwmr &V A Item 10. - 314 HB -636- 9/18/2017 Distribution of Land uses - Residential uses largest land use — 42% of planning area — Single-family residential makes up approximately 70% of the residential land use category - Rights of way make up approximately 20% I Development capacity Draft General Plan Update Development Capacity Land Use Non -Residential Residential Uses Uses (Dwelling Units) (Square Feet) Existing (2014) 78,175 45,052,000 Proposed (2040)1 85,403 50,437,000 Net Difference 7,228 5,385,000 Note: I Some land uses identified as proposed at the time the land use inventory was completed in 2014 have recently been occupied or are currently under construction. HB -637- Item 10. - 315 315 9/18/2017 Development Capacity � Plan adopted `Plan fiorecasted Update 20413 Residential Units 92,679 units 86,499 units 85,403 units Non-residential 79,790,420 sT 45,748,00050,437,000 Square feet The development capacity represents the realistic amount of development anticipated in the City based on the distribution of land uses reflected on the General Plan Land Use Map, The development capacity is not a target or goal for development of the City, morvi Research and Technology Proposed along Gothard Corridor and in northwest Industrial areas Encourages employment uses and commercial uses design to accommodate employees while continuing to allow traditional industrial uses such as manufacturing and production. Provides a flexible platform for both industrial and commerci uses that do not fit into the City's historically commercial or industrial areas. Many new business types require this flexibility as they may need both commercial and industrial components to conduct business and grow a business. Item 10. - 316 HB -638- 6 9/18/2017 Research and Technology • Goals and policies set the framework for the City to, — Recognize potential for growth in these areas — Support business retention and growth — Support and improve technology infrastructure to meet the needs of existing and potential future businesses — Encourage and assist existing and potential future property owners to update, modernize and expand their properties — Provide incentives to retain, expand, and capture new businesses, including research and development industries and start-ups The intent of the Research and Technology designation is not to limit existing uses, but to expand what existing and new uses can do within their space. Circulation Element chw Updated in 2013 Incorporates Complete Streets legislation Arterial Highway Plan • Identifies existing and proposed roadways • Identifies roadway F_ classifications • Accommodates growth anticipated by the Draft General Plan, with recommended improvements ati 4 r7 HB -639- Item 10. - 317 9/18/2017 Draft General Plan Update Elements Noise Element Public Services and — Describes how the City considers noise Infrastructure control in the planning process — Includes policies that ensure — Identifies existing and future noise adequate infrastructure and conditions, noise sensitive land uses public services are in place to support anticipated growth and sources of noise Natural and Environmental Environmental Resources and Hazards Conservation Addresses natural and man - Includes goals and policies relating to made hazards the preservation and maintenance of Also addresses coastal open space areas hazards, emergency Addresses air quality, water quality, preparedness and greenhouse gas emissions, biological hazardous materials and resources and mineral resources waste MON Draft Program OR Impacts — EIR analyzes 15 topical impact areas — Significance of impacts based on established thresholds — In CEQA terms, impacts categorized as: • No impact • Less than significant • Less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measures • Potentially significant Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures identified to reduce level of significance or minimize less than significant impacts General Plan Update proposed to be self -mitigating via goals and policies Significant and Unavoidable Impacts — potentially significant impacts that cannot be feasibly mitigated to a less than significant level ------- o 11=19t,tell Pee Item 10. - 318 HB -640- 8 9/18/2017 Issues Analyzed in the Draft Program EIR 0 Aesthetics & Visual Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology & Soils/Mineral Resources • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Hydrology & Water Quality • Land Use & Planning • Noise & Vibration • Population, Housing & Employment • Public Services • Recreation • Traffic & Transportation • Utilities & Service Systems (including Energy) &=arm significant and Unavoidable impacts Air Quality — Emissions estimates from individual projects difficult to quantify at this time — Cannot determine at programmatic level whether future rojects would exceed SCAQG emissions thresholds • Cultural Resources — Infeasible to determine whether future development would result in demolition or removal of historical, archeological and paleontological resources NEM�W — Urban Water Master Plan indicates that future water supplies could accommodate General Plan growth — Uncertainty of water supply across California and the west — Future water supply deficit could occur =WA HB -641- Item 10. - 319 9/18/2017 Signilicant and Unavoidable Impacts Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Implementation 0f Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures iS currently optional; therefore, there isO0 certainty that erni8s)On8 would bSreduced to levels consistent with existing state laws and plans Alternatives CEQA requiresanBRhz identify and analyze mreasonable range mf alternatives tothe project that would: - Feasibly obtain most ofthe objectives ofthe project - Avoid orsubstantially lessen any ofthe significant effects ufthe project, as proposed The Draft Program BRevaluated 3A|hernadvea: lO ItemlO 320 9/18/2017 Final Program OR • Includes Draft Program EIR (made available for public review from May 22 through July 7) • Comments on the Draft Program EIR • Responses to comments on the Draft Program EIR • Text changes to the Draft Program EIR • Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 01! 7� Egg WHIPS Statement of Overriding Considerations • If the lead agency determines that it is infeasible to mitigate a significant environmental impact, the agency must adopt a "statement of overriding considerations." - The lead agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment. ffl�r- HB -643- Item 10. - 321 9/18/2017 Planning COMMISSION, WON • Planning Commission held a series of 5 study sessions once draft GPU and EIR were released — June 13 — June 27 — July 11 — July 25 — August 8 • On August 15, 2017 Planning Commission held a public hearing and unanimously recommended approval of the General Plan Update and Program EIR Recommendation,. EIR • Recommend certification of Program EIR No. 14-001 because: — It adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the General Plan Update — Identifies project alternatives pursuant to CEQA — Provides mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts — Has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). I 12 Item 10. - 322 1413 -644- 9/18/2017 Recommendation — General Plan Update Recommend approval of GeneralPlan Update (GPA No. 14-002) because: — Complies with state law related to requirements for General Plans; — Incorporates state legislation enacted since the previous (1996) General Plan was adopted; — Provides for consistency among the required elements; — Resolves an inconsistency between the Circulation Element and the Land Use Element; — Is consistent with the March 2015 City Council direction to streamline the General Plan and reduce the number of optional elements while still complying with state law; Recommendation — General Plan Update Recommend approval of General Plan Update (GPA No. 14-002) because: — Reflects the Community Vision and Guiding Principles as established by the GPAC based on community input; — Provides for economic, social, and quality of life benefits that outweigh the adverse environmental effects of the Plan (SOC); — Establishes a development capacity and policy framework for Huntington Beach over an approximate 25-year planning horizon (to 2040); and — Updates the goals and policies to ensure the General Plan remains a useful tool for the future in guiding City decisions regarding land use, the design and/or character of buildings and open spaces, the conservation of existing housing and the provision of new housing, the provision of supporting infrastructure and public services, the protection of environmental resources, the allocation of fiscal resources, and the protection of residents from natural and human - caused hazards. HB -645- Item 10. - 323 9/18/2017 Item 10. - 324 HB -646- 14