HomeMy WebLinkAboutApprove November 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing Pla Council/Agency Meeting Held: /?� .2D0
Deferred/Continued to:
)..App ve� ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied 9 City rl s gnatu e
Council Meeting Date: 12/3/2007 Department ID Number: CS07-026
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY C*A, ITY
M
SUBMITTED BY: PENELOPE CULBRETH-GRAFT, DA IN TOR
PREPARED BY: JIM B. ENGLE, DIRECTOR, COMMUNI ER VI
SCOTT HESS, DIRECTOR, PLANNIN
SUBJECT: APPROVE NOVEMBER 2007 SURPLUS SCHOOL PROPERTY
PURCHASING PLAN
Statement:,f Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue: The disposal of surplus school property that qualifies as park or
recreational open space is regulated by the Naylor Act. This Act gives the city first priority to
acquire a surplus school site but requires the city to adopt a Surplus School Property
Purchasing Plan prior to such acquisition. This report transmits a Surplus School Property
Purchasing Plan for the City of Huntington Beach for City Council consideration.
Funding Source: Not applicable.
Recommended Actions: Motions to:
1. Approve the November 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan for the city of
Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach City School District; and
2. Direct staff to update the November 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan as
additional school sites are identified for surplus for City Council approval.
Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the November 2007 Surplus School Property
Purchasing Plan and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis: The disposal of surplus school property that qualifies as park or recreational
open space is regulated by the Naylor Act. Disposition (including either sale or lease) must
be in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act, which include giving the city first
priority to acquire any surplus school site, along with the condition that the city may not
Surplus School Property Purchasino Plan
ANALYSIS
Open Space Considerations - Park Perspective
School sites are important to the fabric of the community because of.the open space that
they provide. The Naylor Act exists to allow a city to preserve school property for outdoor
recreational and open space purposes. Accordingly, the City's approach in developing this
Plan was to evaluate the open space condition for each subarea served by the closed
school site.
In 1999, the City, working jointly with the four elementary school districts, hired a
consultant to complete a Community Sport Facilities Inventory and Needs Assessment
(CSFINA) Study that divided the city into 30 subareas, essentially on a quarter section
basis with adjustments due to geographical, city boundary or other physical
considerations, e.g. major streets. Figure 3 (Page 11 of report) is a map of the subareas.
The Needs Assessment tabulated the amount of open space (City and School) available in
each subarea and compared it with the General Plan parkland standard of five acres of
parkland per 1,000 persons. The Needs Assessment concluded that although the City
met this standard overall, there were some subareas that were deficient.
For the purposes of this report, data for the subareas with closed school sites were
updated based on the 2007 CSFINA Study, utilizing 2000 Census figures to determine the
existing need for parkland within each subarea based on the City standard. In addition, a
more refined estimation of the usable open space at school sites was completed which
included adding the amount of black top play area acreage to the total open space
acreage for each school site within HBCSD. The parkland need was then compared to
available City parkland and School open space that would continue to be available if a
school or schools were surplused. Table 2 presents the results of the analysis. As an
example, Subarea 28 has a shortage of 7.2 acres of open space and only has 41 percent
of the open space needed in this subarea. At the other extreme, Subarea 29 has a
surplus of 12.9 acres of open space. However, as noted in the Approach section, each of
these sites will also be analyzed from a youth sports open space perspective. The park
and youth sports assessments will then be combined to create the final recommendation
of this study.
Table 2
Open Space Needs in Subareas with Closed School Sites
Subarea Closed Open Space Subarea .Percent of Park Need
School Surplus or(Deficit) Satisfied
(Acres)
c +=
o 0 28 LeBard (7.2) 41%
27 Burke (17.2) 55%
oU)
a CL 30 Gisler 11.4 128%
C5
Cn
29 Kettler 12.9 148%
Page 4
Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan
Open Space Considerations - Youth Sports Perspective
As noted previously, the Naylor Act applies to school sites which are used for school
playground, playing field or other outdoor recreation purposes, and other open space
particularly suited for recreational purposes. This description applies to the areas of a
school used by community youth sports groups and includes sports fields, parking, black
top play areas and other associated amenities. Black top play areas are included in
Figure 4 (Page 12 of report) because these areas provide recreational opportunities,
including basketball courts which are used by youth organizations for practice as well as
by the general public.
Figure 4 also shows the youth sports group usage of the HBCSD sites by one or more
youth sports groups, including the closed school sites. All of the closed school sites are
allocated for use by one or more sports groups as are all of the active school sites. The
only exception is Huntington Seacliff School which the district hasn't previously approved
for allocation.
Moreover, to facilitate the use of school fields, the City and/or groups have installed
permanent lighting at some locations. Although lights are a consideration for soccer and
football because of the time of year of the primary season, there are other considerations
for sports such as softball and baseball, where the amenities needed to play the sport are
more extensive and difficult to relocate. Examples of permanent amenities include large
backstops, brick dust infields, dugouts, batting cages, snack bars, restrooms, etc. This
high level of usage by groups eliminates the possibility of relocating the group usage from
a closed school site to another open or closed school, because all sites are currently in
use by one or more groups.
The only other option would be to relocate to a park. City staff has evaluated the type of
usage at the four closed schools to determine if there are opportunities to relocate a
sports use to a park site as discussed below.
LeBard and Kettler:
At LeBard and Kettler, the type of permanent baseball and softball facilities, as well as
the amount of land required to relocate the existing fields make such a move impossible
unless other recreation facilities used by the public at a park are eliminated. However,
displacing one type of recreational user group by another group is not equitable.
Burke and Gisler:
Relocating the soccer facilities at Burke or Gisler is not possible at this time due to lack of
available unused or unallocated space. In the future, it may be possible to relocate the
Burke facilities to Edison Community Park which is being reconfigured to add a
competition soccer/football field and three lighted soccer/football practice areas. But the
project is currently only partially funded ($1.2 million of the $5.5 million required) and no
other funds are anticipated in the immediate future. Phase I development plans for
Edison consist primarily of a parking lot, with some practice area. A competition field is
Page 5
Surplus School Property Purchasin Plan
not included and existing plans cannot be altered due to the significant shortage of
parking on site.
Gisler has two lighted competition fields that could not be accommodated at Edison Park
even after reconfiguration to the approved masterplan because there will be only one full
size competition field. Staff had also evaluated the adjacent Gisler Park property that is a
licensed area from the Edison Company based upon five-year term increments. It is too
narrow to relocate the two Gisler School soccer fields without causing significant light,
noise, parking and other negative impacts on the adjacent residential neighbors. Gisler
and Burke also have baseball fields which would, as noted for LeBard and Kettler, be
problematic to relocate.
Acquisition Options:
Table 3 below considers what acreage the City needs to acquire to address the youth
sports needs at each closed school site. The table shows not only the open space, but
also the parking needed to accommodate the current or existing recreation use (youth
sports). That needed open space is designated as Critical Open Space in bold.
Table 3
Youth Sports Open Space Needs at Closed School Sites
HBCSD CLOSED School Total Open Parking Area Acquisition of
SCHOOL` Acres Space: (Acres) Critical
Acres .Open Space
Burke 7.72 4.1 1.28 5.38
Gisler 14.10 9.0 2.18 11.18
Kettler 9.80 6.5 1.23 7.73
LeBard 10.16 7.6 .44 8.04
NAYLOR ACT RECOMMENDATIONS
The City has the option of acquiring 30 percent of the available surplus open space which
totals 12.53 acres. This acreage could be taken at one site or multiple sites. The City
would make this decision based on the specific site or sites declared surplus by the
school district.
The surplus school sites are not prioritized. The Plan provides site by site evaluations of
the open space needs for each individual closed school site. This is based on the
following: 1. It is not known which site or sites will be surplused by the district; 2. All of
the school sites are utilized by youth sports groups and alternative park space is
problematic; 3. There is a shortfall of park open space in two subareas; and 4. If there is a
shortage of open space from either a park or youth sports perspective, then there is a
need to acquire open space at that site.
Page 6
Surplus School Property Purchasin-d Plan
Based on the analysis of need for open space from park and youth sports use
perspectives, the following recommendations are made in bold relative to each specific
HBCSD site:
Park Open Youth Sports Final Plan
Surplus Site Space Perspective Needs Perspective Recommendation
Burke Acquire 4.1 acres. Acquire 5.38 acres Acquire 5.38 acres
Gisler Do Not Acquire* Acquire 11.18 acres Acquire 11.18 acres
Kettler Do Not Acquire* Acquire 7.73 acres Acquire 7.73 acres
LeBard Acquire 6.5 acres Acquire 8.04 acres Acquire 8.04 acres
*Note: Not needed to maintain City's park standard in this subarea.
As additional closed school sites are surplused, the City's Surplus School Purchasing Plan
must be updated to address that school district. Only at that time will the data be certain
to facilitate a City decision regarding other closed school sites. With an update,the City
can develop a specific scenario that reflects current data on usage by neighborhood
residents and youth sports groups, open space needs within a subarea, and available
park and open space area for a specific site or sites.
Page 7
Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan
APPENDIX
Page 8
Zo,
ILI U
Im.
Slim
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 12/3/2007 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CS07-026
acquire more than 30 percent of the site. In order to receive this priority, however, the City
Council must make a finding, approved by a vote of two-thirds of its members, that the public
lands within the vicinity of the school site are inadequate to meet the community's needs for
playground, playing field, or other outdoor recreational and open space purposes. The
purpose of the attached plan is to fulfill this Naylor Act requirement.
There are currently twelve closed school sites within the City of Huntington Beach. Four of
these sites fall within the boundaries of Huntington Beach City School District (HBCSD),
seven fall within the boundaries of Ocean View School District, and one is located within
Westminster School District. Since the HBCSD is actively evaluating alternative uses for its
four closed school sites, it is timely to update the findings of the prior May 2, 2005 Surplus
School Property Purchasing Plan to include a detailed analysis of the park and recreational
open space needs within the HBCSD boundaries.
The November 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan (Attachment #1) evaluates
these needs from a park and youth sports use and field allocation perspective and
recommends the amount of acreage to be acquired for each individual closed school site
should the HBCSD ultimately decide to dispose of any or all of its closed school sites. The
Plan also provides detailed background information regarding the closed school sites,
including available open space park and school acreage, number and type of sports fields,
and youth organizations assigned to each field.
Staff recommends that City Council approve the November 2007 Surplus School Property
Purchasing Plan so that it will be in a position to respond in a timely manner in the event that
the HBCSD Board makes a determination to dispose of any or all of the sites. It should be
noted, however, that approval of the attached plan does not require or obligate the city to
acquire any of the school sites.
Strategic Plan Goal: Approval of the November 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing
Plan makes sure that the city has a plan for the use of surplus school property to ensure
compatible uses within the surrounding neighborhood and meet community needs. In
addition, the plan will help preserve the quality of our neighborhoods, maintain open space,
and provide for the preservation of historic neighborhoods.
Environmental Status:
Attachment(s):
• - • -® • •
1. November 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan
-2- 11/16/2007 10:08 AM
ATTACHMENT # 1
ink,= j,�a
i
Jj
-
y
1 a. y
e" -
r
t
f_
+ u.
•�'""v �-'4F� ShAa�4� - •� !*�� ' x 'rJ L' Y}'-•^ � y 89� Affi.�y'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY 1
APPROACH 2
OVERVIEW OF CLOSED SCHOOLS 3
ANALYSIS 4
Open Space Considerations - Park Perspective 4
Open Space Considerations - Youth Sports Perspective 5
NAYLOR ACT RECOMMENDATIONS 6
APPENDIX 8
i
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE
Table 1 Summary Data for Closed Schools 3
Table 2 Open Space Needs in Subareas with Closed School Sites 4
Table 3 Youth Sports Open Space Needs 6
APPENDIX
Figure 1 Huntington Beach City School District Map 9
Figure 2 City Parks Located within HBCSD Boundaries 10
Figure 3 Subareas Map 11
Figure 4 School Site/Youth Sports Group Usage 12
ii
Surplus School PropertyPurchasino Plan
LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY
The disposition of surplus property owned by any public entity in California is governed
by the surplus property statutes codified in Government Code Sections 54220, et seq.
The Education Code provides supplemental regulations that govern the disposition of
surplus school sites. (Education Code Sections 17230, et seq., 17385, et seq.) In
addition, the disposal of surplus school property that also qualifies as park or
recreational open space is regulated by the Naylor Act, which is codified in Education
Code Sections 17485, et seq.
The net effect of the Naylor Act is to make certain surplus school property available to
a city at less than fair market value. The Naylor Act only applies to parcels of land
owned by school district to which the following conditions exist:
(a) Either the whole or a portion of the school site consists of land, which is used
for school playground, playing field, or other outdoor recreational purposes, and open-
space land particularly suited for recreational purposes;
(b) The land described in (a) has been used for one or more of the purposes
specified therein for at least eight years immediately preceding the date of the
governing board's determination to sell the school site;
(c) No other available public-owned land in the vicinity of the school site is
adequate to meet the existing and foreseeable needs of the community for
playground, playing field, or other outdoor recreational and open-space purposes.
(Education Code Sections 17486, 17487.)
Once a school district decides to sell or lease a school site containing property subject
to the Naylor Act,the disposition must be in accordance with the procedures set forth
in the Act.' The City of Huntington Beach is given first priority to purchase any surplus
school sites located within the city. Within sixty days after receiving notice of sale from
the school district, the City must provide written notification of the City's intent to
purchase the surplus property. If the City chooses to purchase property from the
school district, the City Council shall first make a finding, approved by a vote of two-
thirds of its members, that public lands within the vicinity of the school site are
inadequate to meet the existing and foreseeable needs of the community for
playground, playing field, or other outdoor recreational and open space purposes.
(Education Code Section 17492.)
1 A school district may exempt up to two surplus sites under certain specified circumstances.
(Education Code§17497.) Also,the Act permits the governing board of the school district to choose to
retain any part of a school site containing structures or buildings,together with such land adjacent
thereto as the governing board determines must be included in order to avoid reducing the value of that
part of the school site containing the structures or buildings to less than 50%of the fair market value.
(Education Code§17490.)
Page 1
Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan
Education Code Section 17493 requires that the City must have adopted a plan for the
purchase of surplus school property. Moreover, it specifies that public agencies are
restricted to acquiring no more than 30 percent of surplus sites at the less-than-fair
market price under the Naylor Act. Section 17493 is set forth below:
(a) No public agency may purchase surplus school property from a
school district pursuant to this article unless it has first adopted a plan
for the purchase of surplus school property. The plan shall designate
the surplus site or sites all or a portion of which the public agency
desires to purchase at the price established pursuant to this article
and shall designate at least 70 percent of the total surplus school
acreage as property which the agency does not desire to purchase at
the price established pursuant to this article. Where the plan indicates
that the agency desires to purchase only a portion of a school site at
the price established pursuant to this article, it shall designate the
percent of the property to be so purchased and provide a description of
the general location of the property to be purchased, without
designating the metes and bounds.
The purpose of this Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan is to fulfill the
requirement of Education Code Section 17493.
APPROACH
The City of Huntington Beach is served by four elementary school districts, one high
school district and one community college district. Huntington Beach City School
District (HBCSD) is considering potential sale or lease of school sites. It had declared
Gisler and Burke surplus prior to leasing the sites to private schools. LeBard is closed
and currently used as the district office. Kettler has been closed and is currently not
occupied.
The mandate of the State Education Code is to prepare a plan for acquisition of surplus
school sites. Given that HBCSD is currently evaluating its sites, this Surplus School
Property Purchasing Plan ("Plan") evaluates only HBCSD closed or surplus sites. This
approach enables the City to comprehend the long-term and geographic issues
relevant to the loss of school sites and provides information to facilitate strategic
planning and acquisition decisions relative to this geographic area of the city. In 2005,
the City adopted a citywide plan. The study stated that "recommendations are only
provided for sites that have been surplused at this time (2005) because of the
certainty associated with the current data and conditions pertaining to these sites. To
the extent that additional school sites are closed or surplused in the future, this Plan
should be updated." Therefore,this 2007 plan shall address that specific school
district, HBCSD, which is currently considering possible changes by surplusing
additional sites.
It should also be noted that the 2005 study addressed which schools could be
purchased under Naylor Act regulations based upon a deficit of open space. This 2007
Page 2
Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan
study not only addresses the loss of open space, but also includes the use of the
school sites by youth sports organizations whether or not that particular closed school
site is in a parkland deficit area. This approach is in accordance with Condition C of
Section 17485 as noted above which focuses on a community's critical need for open
space for playing fields and other recreational purposes. Moreover, the 2007 Plan
examines all open space, including open turf play and hardscape recreation areas
including, but not limited to basketball, volleyball, and blacktop games such as four
square.
OVERVIEW OF HBCSD CLOSED SCHOOLS
The four HBCSD closed school sites have not been used by the school district for public
education for many years. The district has entered into long-term leases at Burke and
Gisler for use by private schools. One site (LeBard) is used as school district offices.
The fourth site (Kettler) is not occupied. When on-site open space is available, youth
sports are allocated or assigned use of that open space by the City with the final
approval of the school district. The following table provides basic information
regarding all of the school district's surplus sites that was used in the analysis to
support the Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan, including 2006/2007 youth
sports allocation data. The table also indicates if the City has any park land adjacent
to the school sites. Figure 1 of the Appendix depicts the geographic area served by
HBCSD.
Table 1
Summary Data for HBCSD Closed Schools
HBCSD USE SCHOOL SCHOOL< FIELD A6LOCATIONS
a
CLOSED . ��TOTAL -OPEN ;- /�T SCHOOL SITE
SCHOOL P��NACRES*,J�
SPACE
Burke Huntington 7.72 4.1 Baseball: Feb-Jul
Christian Soccer:Year round
Gisler Brethren 14.1 9.0 Baseball: Feb-July
Christian High Soccer:Year round
Kettler Not in Use 9.8 6.5 Softball:Year round
Football:Aug-Feb
LeBard District.Office 10.16 7.6 Baseball:Year round
* includes turf and black top area of schools used as play areas
TOTAL SURPLUS SCHOOL OPEN SPACE = 41.78 ACRES
NAYLOR ACT 30 PERCENT = 12.53 ACRES
Page 3
Surplus School Property PurchasinO Plan
Figure 2: City Parks Located Within HBCSD Boundaries
City Park Size (Ac.)Type Sports Fields
Baca 10.0 Neighborhood NO
Bailey 0.5 Mini NO
Bartlett* 30.0 Community NO*
Burke 2.5 Neighborhood NO
Discovery Well 8.0 Neighborhood NO
Eader 2.7 Neighborhood NO
Edison 40.0 Community YES
Farquhar 3.0 Neighborhood NO
Finley 0.5 Mini NO
Gisler 11.7 Neighborhood NO
Green 4.0 Neighborhood NO
Hawes 2.7 Neighborhood NO
Helme 2.0 Neighborhood NO
Lake 4.4 Neighborhood NO
Le Bard 5.0 Neighborhood NO
McCallen 5.2 Neighborhood NO
Manning 2.5 Neighborhood NO
Moffet 2.4 Neighborhood NO
Pattinson 3.5 Neighborhood NO
Perry 2.0 Neighborhood NO
Seeley 3.4 Neighborhood NO
Sowers 2.4 Neighborhood NO
Worthy 12.0 Community YES
* Bartlett Park currently has Newland Barn and historical Newland House with grass
between buildings and small parking lot developed; remainder of park is not developed due to
site constraints.
Page 10
Sip—Facilities 1--my aM N-d,A
LEGEND
B-Lane Major(Divide(
a WESTMINSTER,., 6-Lane Major(Divide(
'0. ........ 4-Lane Primary(Divic
————— Census Boundary
I Map Area Reference i
15� SAN,DIE(
0 12
FO,UNTAIN
Q
VA4EY %
•%
7
3
U)
6
288 j-
SEAL BEACH
WEAPONS STATION • e""
21"8
2 1
'14
q
Y
�N
•?b i, 4'.,
BOLSA CHICA WETLANDS .20
90
ACIPiC
20"!yT HIGHw
AY
PACIFIC OCEAN
Note., Areas are defined by physical barriers of major highways and primary streets. in addition,population census
areas were utilized to define other area boundaries not divided by physical barriers,
ef e re n q e Mde::aim
Main.0ouble click 9 till 3199.11:26 AM
surplus School Proverty Purchasing Plan
Figure 4: HBCSO School Sites/Youth Sports Group Usage
O'pdff Parking Assigned
Spa
$,P h 0,0 1, (Acres Acr6s)' (Acres) 'Field T Fie['ds, Or anizn As!0 n urnmer Winter
BURKE 7.73 4.1 1.28 Sooner 1 /Y/SO#56 1 yea yes
Hunt-Christian SVLL 2 yes
Ovvver 9.4 65 0.3 Soccer/Football 1 Umum||yGCB- UndarConstnuotion
Bonebo|| 2
Eodor 10.7 7.0 0.7 8000ar 2 YMCA 1 yes
AYGO#56 2 yes
Softball/Baseball 3 SVLL 4 yes
G|SLER 14.1 9.0 2.18 Soccer 3 AGYO#58 3 yes yes
BrethChriaUon Baseball SVLL 1 yes
Hoxvas 7.8 4.5 2.0 Goftbo|KBmmaba|| 2 SVLL 2 yes
Soccer 2 /0'GO#56 2 yes
None
kETTLEpk 9.8 8.5 1.23 Softball 8 SHB S yes yea
Football 1 POP 1 yes
LEBARD 10.16 7.6 0.44 Baseball G SVLL G yes yes
District Office
Moffett 8.0 5.4 1.28 Softball/Baseball 2 FVPBB 2 yes
Soccer 2 AYGO#50 1 yes
Perry 10.2 5.6 0.89 Baseball/Softball 4 HVLL 1 yes
(backstops
1
Peterson 15.4 10.1 1.5 Soccer 5 SVLL 4 yes
SH8 2 yes
AYSO#5G 3 yes
Smith 9.8 5.0 0.48 Soccer 1 YMCA 1 yes
Baseball naoo 2
Sowers 14.2 88 1.4 Softball/Baseball 4 SVLL 6 yes
Soccer 3 AY8O#56 2 yes
QC 1
*Open Space includes turf and blacktop area uf school used aa play areas
Page 12
Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan
Figure 4
Legend" AYSO American Youth Soccer Organization FVPBB Fountain Valley Pony Baseball
HVLL Huntington Valley Little League POP Pop Warner Football
SHB So. HB Girls Fast Pitch Softball SC South Coast Soccer
SVLL Sea View Little League SCB South Coast Bayern Soccer
HIGH SCHOOL FIELDS USED BY HBCSD YOUTH SPORTS GROUPS
® .
Sph!601
School ® . .
Edison 48.4 27.2 5.3 Baseball 2 SVLL 1 yes
Softball 1 FVPBB 1 yes
Soccer(light-2) 3 SC 2 yes
Football 1 POP 1 yes
EDISON TEAMS yes yes
. Gky'„ zw.3' i,,t�, t`'✓'".°a'kfi. x'"r,. e^ # ,4"',. n ,.' ,s..'
Huntington 43.0 18.9 4.1 Baseball 2 HVLL 2 yes
Football/Soccer 3 JAAF 3 yes
Softball 2 HBHS yes yes
TEAMS
Backstop w/Turf 2
*Open Space includes turf and blacktop area of school used as play areas
Page 13
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Community Services
SUBJECT: Approve 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing Plan
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 3, 2007
RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑
Not Ap licable ❑
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable ❑
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached ❑
Not Applicable ❑
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) Attached ❑
(Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable ❑
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. Attached ❑
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable ❑
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Attached ❑
Not A plicable ❑
Fiscal Impact Statement (Unbudgeted, over$5,000) Attached ❑,
Not Applicable ❑\
Bonds (If applicable) Attached ❑Not Applicable ❑
Staff Report (If applicable) Attached 9
Not Applicable ❑
Commission, Board or Committee Report (if applicable) Attached ❑
Not Ap licable ❑
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached ❑
Not Applicable ❑
EXPLAHATOOH FOR a I�S�ING AT TACHNEWS
REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED
Administrative Staff ( ,
Deputy City Administrator (Initial)
City Administrator (Initial) ) ( )
City Clerk ( )
EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM:
RCA Author: kuhnke
I�Ir