The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 99-82- Authorizing Destruction of Certain City Re CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 9I17 � MEETING DATE: 9/7/99 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: 99-016 Council/Agency Meeting Held: Def rred/Continued to: Apnyrov d ❑ Co itionally Approved ❑ Denied te�6-b—/ p- 6id ity Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: 9/7/99 Department ID Number: 99-016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: H NOPABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ={ SUBMITTED BY: TGOIZ HUTTON, City Attorney N) PREPARED BY: AIL HUTTON, City Attorney Pe-5. Alo 99%' 92- 'C, SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DESTROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE RECORYDS N M Fstatement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Approval to destroy City Attorney's Office records under the authority of Government Code § 34090, a department may destroy certain city records with the consent of the City Attorney and the City Council by resolution. Funding Source: None Recommended Action: Motion to adopt Resolution No. granting authorization to destroy the records listed in Exhibit "A". Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the Resolution. Analysis: The destruction of the records on the attached Exhibit "A" is necessary to conserve storage and reduce staff time, expense and confusion in retrieving documents. Environmental Status: None Attachment Us : City Clerk's . . - Number No. Description Exhibit "A", City Attorney's Files to be Destroyed 2. Resolution No. 99-17 -2- 08/16/99 1:20 PM t f RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO DESTROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE RECORDS COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 7, 1999 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement Unbud et, over $5,000 Not Applicable Bonds If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report If applicable) Not Applicable Commission, Board or Committee Report If applicable) Not Applicable Find in s/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS ,F REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED Administrative Staff Y :Iry Assistant City Administrator Initial City Administrator Initial { Glil! City Clerk EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM: SpaceOnly) RCA Author: JEG � s � �= e g :�- "�` `�. �. �o � - ,, , _ Y RESOLUTION NO. 99-82, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 34090.5, 34090.6 and 81009 provide, among other things, that certain public records may be destroyed with the consent of the City Attorney and concurrence of the City Council; and The City Attorney requests permission to destroy such records; and The City Attorney of the City of Huntington Beach hereby consents to the destruction of such records, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that approval is hereby given for the destruction of records as listed on Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, no record shall be destroyed which is expressly required to be retained under California Government Code Section 34090. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of September ,1999. K��t� , A Mayor ATTEST: I consent to destruction of the listed records: City Clerk City Attorney ef- 7 REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: o City A inistrator lxe4� City Attorney / 7 sf'y INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Attorney /-7 resolut/destroy/08/16/99 Res. No. 99-82 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, COWI E BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of September, 1999 by the following vote: AYES: Julien,Bauer, Green,Dettloff, Harman, Sullivan NOES: None ABSENT: Garofalo ABSTAIN: None City Clerk and ex-officio CI of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California I City Attorney's Office Files in Storage Facility Box# Closed Contents Destruction Date Date 95-074 1993 CLOSED LITIGATION Allen, Leroy v. City—OCSC—#53 98 74 1998 Benner, Alick v. City—Claim #90-53— File#91-1021 Brady, James III v. City WOCMC# 185252 Burns, Michael v. City— File#91114 Central Industrial Engineering v. City—66-38-29 City v. CAN —OCSC -#71-03-96 City v. Majid Harb—OCSC -#70-41-34 City of Roman E.C.D. —OCSC -#69-48-48 95-075 1993 Cooper, Mary v. City—OCSC -#68-75-52 1998 Cornithian Industries v. Redevelopment—64-79-61 DeMartin, Edwin v. Bradley/City WOCMC— 18-75-50 Englekirk, Robert v. Ray Wilson/City—OCSC -#65-30-28 Flanigan, Steven v. City—OCSC -#66-02-74 95-077 1998 Garza v. City OCSC -#68-95-78 Glenn v. City OCSC-#69-13-79 Graham v. City OCSC#66-33-34 Graham v. City OCSC#64-53-08 Grey V. City WOCMC# 18-61-09 GTE Calif v. State Board of Equalization OCSC #52-33-55 People v. Henein WOCMC DVW 929355PO Hanrahan v. City OCSC#68-41-03 People v. Hussein Berri 95-077 Hayes v. City OCSC#66-10-39 95-078 1993 Danny Knight v. Cory Hillman OCSC #64-72-48 litigation George Krumsick v. Osness OCSC -#61 75 07 John, Lolli v. D'Ambra OCSC#70 10 08 MacHi-Reach Inc. v. City OCSC# 16 81 62 Murphy, Anna v. City OCSC#67-09-05 Parson, Robin v. City File#91-1053 Piccaro, Charles v. City OCSC# 70-98-12 U.S. Government v. Montrose Potlatch v. City USDC#CV 990-3122 95-079 1993 Quill, Cristin v. City OCSC#61-88-50 litigation Rios, Monica V. City OCSC#55-90-54 Rivas, Joan v. City OCSC#70-45-73 People v. Suan & Vince Redmond Scott, Joseph v. City OSCS# 56-51-05 95-80 1993 litigation Smith John L. v. City OCSC#57-13-06 Sporing v. City OCSC#62-43-76 Studley v. City OCSC#69-78-83 Subnick v. City OCSC #69-15-02 Toomey v. Artistic City WOCMC# 19-24-39 Wilson v. City WOCMC# 18-30-27 Wilson d. v. City G:\attymisc\closed.doc\exA99.doc EXHIBIT A City Attorney's Office Files in Storage Facility Box# Closed Contents Destruction Date Date Drawer#16 1993 CK Construction v. City OCSC#64-80-70 Litigation Cagle/Ridout v. City WOCMC 16-93-69 Bill v. City OCSC#39-22-82 Brewier(Tateno)v. city OCSC# 58-50-98 Allen v. City OCSC#41-12-12 Dishon v. City OCSC #68-48-08 All California Equipment v. L &J Pipeline/City OCSC# 52-24-80 Branch v. City OCSC#67-60-67 Diaz-Castillo v. City OCSC 68-26-90 Compton v. City OCSC#68-76-94 Cesario v. City OCSC# 58-80-15 Cabo Del Mar Homeowners Assoc. v. City OCSC#66-27-52 Caneer v. City OCSC#61-77-11 Enriquez D. v. City OCSC #66-89-12 Carpenter v. City OCSC#69-52-80 Fambry v. City OSCS#60-48-93 Garfield Night Spot v. City OCSC#45-23-96 Grant v. City OCSC#67-81-51 DW Powell Construction v. City OCSC#60-96-09 Heise v. City OCSC#70-37-63 Drawer#17 1993 Jones/Wallce V. City OCSC #62-57-42 Litigation Heidi Leonard v. City OCSC#69-89-67 Osburn v. City OSCS #68-83-30 Drawer#8 1994 Ahadpour v. State Lands Commission USDC#SA CV 93-184 litigation Anthony Wholesale Electric v. City(Breach of Contract) OCSC# 72-67-14 Barham, Rosemary v. City WOCMC#91 C1005 Bell, Burton v. City OCSC#70-77-61 Bellavance v. City LASC #NC 011234 Benson v. City OCSC #71-36-47 Brackley v. City OCSC#66-29-51 Brown, Darrell v. City USDC#SACV 93-1147 Bui, Tien Zuan v. City WOCMC# 19-73-42 Burch, John v. City OCSC # 55-07-37 Byer&Wolsky v. City OCSC #69-77-27 Carlsberg Management Co. V. City WOCMC# 17 30-02 Cayton, Chris v. City City v. The Hartford OCSC#70 65 49 City v. Robert Tinkham WOCMC# 18 31 22 Carothers, Christopher v. City OCSC#69 21 12 City v. Dahl Investor, Inc. OCSC #69-32-13 Christopher v. Casey OCSC #56 26 91 Economaos v. City OCSC#71-22-86 Familian Corp v. Redevelopment WOCMC#20 34 91 Flood v. City OCSC #53-02-17 Drawer#9 1994 Nelson Equipment Rental v. City WOCMC#19 97 99 Closed Litigation Florence, Jerry v. City OCSC #51 86 46 G:\attymisc\closed.doc\exA99.doc EXHIBIT A City Attorney's Office Files in Storage Facility Box# Closed Contents Destruction Date Date Garcia, Eddie v. City LAMC 93CO0638 Garcia, Nicanor v. City OCSC# 19 45 93 Garcia, Roberto & Miguel v. City OCSC #60 31 80 In Re Goldenwest Refining Co. (Bankruptcy) Gomard, John v. City Grantham, Walter v. City OCSC#62 32 76 Hancock, Kathleen v. City OCSC #70 18 77 Hayes, Dorothy v. City OCSC#66 10 39 Hockmuth, Sean v. City OCSC#69 16 39 Hiles, Karen v. City OCSC#54 94 76 Hobson, Carol Lee v. City OCSC#69 38 52 Drawer#9 1994 Hums, Paul Norval v. Grant Lawther OCSC#60 08 07 Closed Litigation Jensen, Ronald v. City OCSC#68 70 11 (cont.) Jacobi, Stephanie OCSC#73 37 04 Jones, Cheryl v. Yard, City OCSC#59 92 91 Kiya Horne, v. City LASC #YC007256 Leveque, Joseph v. City OCSC#69 04 09 Lonzello, Mary OCSC#71 44 67 Lynch, Anne v. City OCSC#71 35 29 Mathieson, Glen v. City OCSC #66 24 47 Maurer, Robert Stephen v. City Drawer#10 1994 May, Charles v. City OCSC #41 73 53 Closed Litigation McChesney, Charles v. City OCSC #71 03 47 McKinn, Robert v. State;City CV-931256 COM Metro Display/Bustop Shelters (Bankruptcy) Miller, James B. v. City OCSC #71 53 74 Mitsui Mfg. v. L.A. Leasing Moran, Robert/Complaint-in-Intervention Morelli, Betty Moreno, v. Van Cleve OCSC #51 72 93 Morrow,Webb v. City OCSC#35 71 61 Mullison v. City OCSC #59 24 36 Murry v. Bogdanoff Nall, Shon A. v. City OCSC #68 14 49 Navarro, Thelma v. City OCSC#70 11 95 Nichols v. City SCSC#70 52 70 Noel, N. v. City USDC CV 93-0462 Owl Rock v. LWM City Engineering SCLA C65 65 99 Palmer v. General Telephone City OCSC#59 35 59 Pardue v. City MCLA 93CO50906 Drawer#11 1994 Parent v. City#52 83 16 Closed Litigation Parten v. City#72 91 73 Patterson v. Nash City#60 87 53 Payne v. City#44 91 11 Pizza Hut of SD v. City#64 02 17 Pleas v. City#32 98 37 Porter HSDMC 88749 Reinhart City#47 24 95 Republic Ins. v. City#41 65 85 Risbon, Jill v. City#66 27 38 Roper v. City#64 83 00 G:\attymisc\closed.doc\exA99.doc EXHIBIT A City Attorney's Office Files in Storage Facility Box# Closed Contents Destruction Date Date Sanchez v. City#70 88 22 Saar v. City#69 59 78 Sherrer v. City#71 24 42 SBD Properties v. City#59 06 09 Sanders v. City#53 24 63 Scanlon v. City#67 06 35 Drawer#11 1994 Schinasi v. City#71 18 17 Closed Litigation Schoeffler v. City#53 36 84 Serna v. City#70 83 17 Silverstein v. City#58 68 12 Smith v. City#55 82 00 S. California Edison v. State Board LASC BC05459 Sorenson v. City#71 30 82 So. Pac. Tran. V. Board of Equal. SFSC#81 04 33 Stoerrle v. City#53 02 50 Smith, Nancy v. City#70 08 35 Drawer#6 1994 Closed Litigation Turner Dioner v. City#60 74 15 Thorton v. City#54 14 90 Torres v. City#69 26 56 Tachett v. City#68 49 63 Van Quest v. City#64 45 35 Vasile v. City N. SanDiego N60349 Tran v. City#52 10 84 Walter v. City#68 63 42 Watkins v. City#67 46 20 Weaver v. City—Grievance Wilms. v. City OCMC 13 99 00 Wilson, Teri v. City#71 02 62 Walfe Tamney v. City#55 45 90 Ulygnanski v. City USDC 92 1048 Zabaneh v. City#72 22 09 Zeidan Prosecution Zinn v. City#50 50 70 G Aattymisc\closed.doc\exA99.doc EXHIBIT A �_�� _ � � .„d"h *.�'� ice-_-. PF �. '�%�. qx& �..,. b �? � �: �. <. a