HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 98-59 - Adopting 1998-99 Tax Rate ($.04930) per $ Council/Agency Meeting Held:
Deferred/Continued to:
Approved _? Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied ZWWY Clerk's Signature
Council Meeting Date: August 3, 1998 Department ID Number: AS 98-022
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administratorcvrp
PREPARED BY: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF PROPERTY TAX RATE FOR 1998/99
es.Ajo.9�
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachments
Statement of Issue: The City Charter states that "There shall be levied. . ., if no other
provision for payment thereof.is made,. . .a tax sufficient to meet all obligations of the City for
the retirement system in which the City participates, due to unpaid or to become due during
the ensuing fiscal year."
The 1998/99 proposed budget includes estimated revenue $6,892,000 from a continuation of
this tax fund 79.2% of the retirement costs of the City. The balance of the retirement costs
are proposed to be paid from other city revenues.
Funding Source: Not applicable.
Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution # setting the tax rate for voter
approved indebtedness.
Alternative Action(s):
1. Do not levy a tax to fund retirement costs.
2. Levy an amount less than the recommended levy. If this is done, the City will
permanently lose the difference in revenue lost by the reduction.
To be consistent with Charter requirements, alternative 1 or 2 can be selected only if the City
makes ". . .other provisions for payment. . ." of the retirement obligations. The proposed
budget for 1998/99 makes no provision for payments of these obligations other than the use
of the $6,892,000 in estimated revenue from a continuation of this levy. Therefore, if either
of the above alternatives is selected, action needs to be taken to determine how to make
provision to pay the City's estimated retirement costs in 1998/99 and in future years. /-
Attachment 3
California Cities Having a Property Tax Levy for Retirement Indebtedness
Albany Monrovia
Oakland Montebello
Richmond Monterey Park
Coalinga Redondo Beach
Fresno San Fernando
Eureka San Gabriel
Alhambra South Pasadena
Bell Whittier
Beverly Hills Fairfax
Burbank San Anselmo
Compton Huntington Beach
Culver City Riverside
El Monte Sacramento
El Segundo Rialto
Glendora La Mesa
Huntington Park Stockton
Inglewood Santa Barbara
Long Beach Watsonville
Los Angeles Cloverdale
Lynwood Santa Rosa
Manhattan Beach Oxnard
Maywood
Source: State Controller's Office publication: Ad Valorem Property Tax Rates Levied in
Excess of the 1%Tax Rate Limitation-Fiscal years 1985/86- 1987/88
(No longer published)
_ Y4•3
'tai-ret.doc 07/16/97
ATTACHMENT #4
Attachment 4
Property Tax Levies in addition to the 1% Basic Levy (1993/94)
Orange County Cities
Background:Proposition 13 limits property tax levies to 1%of Assessed Value,with some exceptions.The 1%Basic Levy is shared
by all pre-Proposition 13 taxing agencies,primarily cities,counties,and school districts.The City of Huntington Beach receives 14.8%
of the basic levy. In addition,cities can levy taxes above the 1%levy,or levy assessments on property,by following procedures
outlined in State law.Following is a chart listing taxes and assessments levied by Orange County cities in 1993/94.(Does not include
taxes or assessments levied by and paid to the county,school,or special districts.)
Taxes Assessments
Cities listed from high to low in terms of
Lt
amount of levies and assessments above 1%
basic levy per $100 Assessed Valuation.
N � °N dm a m
cO
EE Ci S N r N° s c City c °' 9 1° Annual Revenue Per $100 A.V. Per Capita
Placentia .. 54,543 155.. 0.238 $108.61
.......L.......L.......:.......; :........:......4.......L.......L.......
Laguna Beach .......' ' 7,380 198. 0.233 $300.01
y.......q.......p.......q........1 :........... ..p. .q.......p.. .0.......0........p........p.. ..4.......
Tustin ..................... ..._.
San Clemente 5,296,36.0... 0.142 $125.59
5.......5.......5.......A......0 5......•4......•5.......5.......w......5.......y........y........4........• ...----.....,:.........................'
Yorba Linda € € 4,615 800. 0.134 $88.14
.......p.......q.......q.......y ;.................p.......q.......q.......q.......q.. ...0........p........p.. ...
Stanton `: ': € € € 1,054828 0.121 $33.65
Mission Viejo € i ._.. ._......._.......,.......;........_........_........_........ 6 393568 0.108 $84.68
s...............o.......b........j :........<........4.......4.......b.......b.......1........b........y........L........ _. ..
Irvine € € € >: 4,225349: 0.102 $138.90
........q.......q.......q.......y .......,.. ..q.......q.......q.......q.......q........:.. ..:........�........
Laguna-Niguel i € i i i i i * i 4,785 681:: 0.093 $70.65
,.......;.......:....... :.................L......:......._ .. _ ... _ .. _ ... _ ... _ ...
Brea 1 404606: 0.087 $41.87
San Juan Capistrano € € 1 689 853 0.078 $62.35
:.......
Laguna Hills € _ _ 1 667 353. 0.074 $72.69
_.......:.......:....... :........L.......L. ..
Cypress 1 728351 0.074 $39.09
y.......0.......0.......-0........1 :........p......•4.....•.4.....•.4.....•.4.......4........0........0.................
Garden Grove € € € _ _ _ _€ 3 211 001 0.069 $21.69
:.......:.......;...............: ;....... :.......:.......
La Palma € € € € € 454,580 0.064 $29.55
:.......�.......L.......:.......: ..........................L.......L
Huntington Beach M i I ... 6,371 953 0.056 $33.25
y.......p.......q.......q.......•1 ;........p.......p.......p.......p.......q.......q................................... :--
Orange _ _ _ _ € jk 2,8071"92. 0.045 $24.90
_.......:.......:.......
Lake Forest € € € 1 351:,698 0.039 $23.31
........5.......i.......5........: ........4.......4.......L.......L.......L.......5........5........a........5........ --..:. -.-... ...
Costa Mesa 1.,834 256.: 0.029 $18.61
.......q.......q.......q.......y ;........p.......p.......p.......p.......p.......q........p........p........p........ -:.. -.:. ...
Anaheim € € _ _ _ _ _€ .. .:.:3,392988 0.025 $12.80
:.......:.......;.......:........ :....... ................_....... .......
Westiminster 551;010 0.020 $6.90
5.......5.......5................1 ......................... . -.. .....
Los Alamitos 109,184; 0.015 $8.96
.......q.......q.......y.......y :.................p. .q.......:.......:........�........:........:.......
Seal Beach € € € 139.,937 0.008 $5.58
........_......._......._........ :........... L.......L.......
Dana Point _ .. _ ... _ .. _........ 272 214 0.008 $8.53
y.......0.......0.......-0........1 :........1........0......•0.......6.......0.......0.................6........4........ -..:.......
Santa Ana € �k _€ 395625; 0.005 $1.30
,.......q.......q.......q.......y
Newport Beach € € € 262 936. 0.002 $3.71
>.......L.......L................ .........
........
Villa Park ........ 7: 176 0.001 $1.13
y.......e.......q.......p........1 ;........p.......4......•o.......o.......o.......o........o........o........p.......
. -.-::..
Buena Park �k I 12,457 0.000 $0.18
:.......:.......:.......;.......; .......
Fullerton € € € 9 53T: 0.000 $0.08
:.......L.......L.......L....... :................L.......
La Habra L......._ .. - - 3;482 0.000 $0.07
Fountain Valley € 0 0.000 $0.00
_......._......._........ ...................
Average 0.068 $47.93
Huntington Beach compared to Average -17% -31%
Note : Revenue is for Secured Tax levy only, which represents 90% of the total Property tax levy, on the average.
Taxlevy.xls 7/9/98
ATTACHMENT #5
Attachment 5
....................................................................................... .........................................
Property Taxes and Assessments -
Additions to Basic Levy
Placentia
.. ..........
N",M Laguna Beach
Tustin :X
San Clemente
Yorba Linda
Stanton
Irvine .. ...........
............ .......
.............
Brea
San Juan Capistrano
Cypress 4:**-1.XM
.... .......
Garden Grove N . ........ .-
. ......... .....................
K,La Palma �
...............
Huntington Beach
Huntington Beach
Orange
Costa Mesa
Anaheim
Westminster
.......... Los Alamitos
Seal Beach
Santa Ana
Newport Beach
Villa Park
Fountain Valley
La Habra
Fullerton
Buena Park
0% 6% 10% 16% 20% 25%
1993/94 Additional Levy as a % of Total Property Tax Bills
All Orange County Cities except those incorporated since Proposition 13 (1978)
RCA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
SUBJECT: Adoption of Property Tax Rate for 1998/99
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 3, 1998
RCA ATTACHMENTS_ STATUS
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City Attomey) Not Applicable
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc._
(Approved as to form by City Attomey) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attomey) Not Applicable
Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Attached
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable
EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS
REVIEWED RETURNED FOR DED
:
Administrative Staff ( ) ( )
Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( )
City Administrator (Initial)
City Clerk ( )
O EXPLANATION-FOR RETURN
(BelowOnly)
RCA Author: Robert Sedlak
#QUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: August 3, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: AS 98-022
Analysis: The City receives a pro-rata portion of the one-percent basic levy of all real
property (15.6% of the basic levy). In addition, the California Constitution allows cities to
levy additional taxes for voter-approved indebtedness. The City has, since voter approval in
1966, levied an additional tax which pays for a portion of the Charter-approved employee
retirement costs. Under State law, the levy is limited to the lower of the amount needed to
pay the retirement costs or the amount levied in 1984/85. In our case, the lower amount is
the 1984/85 levy of$.04930 per $100 of assessed valuation.
The levy currently covers an estimated 79.2% of the City's retirement costs for 1998/99.
During the past six years, the City's share of the basic levy for property taxes has been
reduced by the State of California from 19.5% to 15.6%. General Fund property tax revenue
from the basic levy has, therefore, been reduced by $5.5 million per year.
Environmental Status: Not applicable.
Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
. . - Number No. Description
1. Resolution Adopting 1998/99 Tax Rate
2. Huntington Beach Property Tax Levy - Retirement Indebtedness
1977/78 to 1998/99.
3. Listing of California Cities Having Property Tax Levy for Retirement
Indebtedness.
4. Property Tax Levies in Addition to the 1% Basic Levy.
5. Property Taxes and Assessments -Additions to Basic Levy.
RCA Author: Robert Sedlak
TRATE99.DOC -2- 07/22/98 3:11 PM
ATTACHMENT # 1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIXING
THE FISCAL YEAR 1998/1999 TAX RATE
WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach will be receiving a pro-rata portion of
the one-dollar($1.00) Basic Property Tax Rate levied by the County Board of
Supervisors as a means of providing revenue for the operation and support of various
city departments, offices and activities; and
In 1966, the electorate of the City of Huntington Beach approved a City Charter
amendment authorizing the collection of a property tax in excess of 1% of the full cash
value of property in order to meet the obligations of the City to pay for employee
retirement through the State Employees Retirement System. This provision was re-
adopted by the electorate in 1978; and
In Carman v. Alvord(1982) 31 Cal.3d 318, the California Supreme Court held that
a tax to fund a city's obligations to the State Employees Retirement System is exempt
from Proposition 13 (Article XIIIA of the California Constitution) as voter-approved
indebtedness; and
Since 1983-84, the City has fixed the rate of property taxation at Zero and
.04930/100ths Dollars ($.04930) per$100 of assessed value in the City to pay for
employees retirement cost; and
Said tax does not constitute an extension of an existing tax requiring voter
approval under Proposition 218'(Articles XIIIC-D of the California Constitution) because
Section 3(a)(1) of Proposition 218 exempts from the voter-approval requirement any tax
already valid under Proposition XIIIA, as interpreted in Carman v. A/vord; and
The tax rate herein is levied pursuant to Section 93 of the Revenue and Taxation
Code for the purpose of paying voter approved indebtedness of the City of Huntington
Beach;
1
reso/1998/taxrate/July 14,1998
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach that the rate of taxation for said city for fiscal year 1998/1999 be fixed
at zero and .04930/100ths dollars ($.04930) per$100 of assessed property value in said
city. The said rate shall be applied as employee retirement costs.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at
a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of August 1998.
ATTEST:
G � May 7
-
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: Z� va"e'�
it A torne 1 4-. 5 P
City Ad istrator D VED:
Deputy City A ministrator/Admi istra ' e
Services
2
reso/1998/taxrate/July 14,1998
Res. No. 98-59
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of
the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City,
do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of August, 1998 by the following
vote:
AYES: Julien, Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan
NOES: None
ABSENT: Garofalo
City Clerk and ex-officio Jerk of the
City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach, California
G/resol uti/resbkpg/97-80
ATTACHMENT #2
Attachment 2
Background: A separate property tax levy for retirement indebtedness was authorized by the
voters in 1966. The tax levy covered a portion of the City's retirement costs. 70%of the costs were
covered in Fiscal Year 1977/78. 42%to 78.4%of the costs have been covered by the levy in the
years since 1977/78. The proposed budget for 1998/99 indicates that 79.2%of the City's retirement
costs will be recovered.
Huntington Beach Property Tax Levy - Retirement Indebtedness
1977/78- 1998/99
Tax;Levy Property Tax Retirement Revenue as
Fiscal Year :Per$100 A.V. Revenue Costs*** % of Cost
1977/78 0.16610 $1,418,858 $2,026,098 70.0%
1978/79 0.13650 1,135,385 2,509,196 45.2%
1979/80 0.14330 1,338,341 3,193,121 41.9%
1980/81 0.14330 1,607,826 3,584,726 44.9%
1981/82* 0.03729 1,978,715 4,028,308 49.1%
1982/83 0.04930 2,792,077 4,329,797 64.5%
1983/84 0.04930 2,994,942 4,543,000 65.9%
1984/85 0.04930 3,299,596 6,870,908 48.0%
1985/86 0.04930 3,440,683 6,911,625 49.8%
1986/87 0.04930 3,773,584 7,097,000 53.2%
1987/88 0.04930 3,929,922 7,134,000 55.1%
1988/89 0.04930 4,592,276 6,817,910 67.4%
1989/90 0.04930 4,867,552 7,375,289 66.0%
1990/91 0.04930 5,230,891 8,162,283 64.1%
1991/92** 0.04930 6,116,356 8,949,277 68.3%
1992/93 0.04930 6,118,857 9,833,755 62.2%
1993/94 0.04930 6,478,879 9,745,290 66.5%
1994/95 0.04930 6,489,367 8,909,787 72.8%
1995/96 0.04930 6,211,715 8,827,634 70.4%
1996/97 0.04930 6,176,694 8,289,453 74.5%
1997/98 Est. 0.04930 6,601,000 8,900,000 74.2%
1998/99 Recommd. 0.04930 6,892,000 8,700,000 79.2%
* Rates were reduced in 1981/82 due to the County changing Assessed
Value to equal 100% of market value. Prior to 1981/82 Assessed Value
was set at 25%of market value.
** Revenue prior to 1991/92 excludes delinquent payments, interest,
and miscellaneous revenue categories.
*** Includes City PERS pickup costs for years after 1977/78.
Taxlevy.xls 7/1 5/98
ATTACHMENT #3