Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTaxes: Fire Protection Exemption 1964 -1975 /o G CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To D. D. Rowlands From R. C. Picard City Administrator Fire Chief Subject FIRE TAX EXEMPTION Date July 28, 1975 Information received this date indicates that it will no longer be necessary to file for Fire Tax Exemption with the County. In 1973 a change was made that gave automatic exemption to all cities that had filed regarding the Fire Tax Exemption at that time. This exemption is good until they are notified different. r aymon C�Piatd' cc• City Clerk March 6, 1973 Board of Supervisors County of Grange P. 0. Box 687 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Gentlemen: The City Council at its regular meeting held on Monday, March 5, 1973, adopted Resolution No. 3647, requesting the County Board of Supervisors to delete all areas within the City of Huntington Beach from the County'Structural FiEe Tax for the fiscal year 1973-74. Enclosed is a copy of said Resolution for your consideration. Sincerely yours, PAUL C. JONES City Clerk By Assistant City Clerk PCJ:aw Encl. RESOLUTION NO. 3647 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON. BEACH REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. TO DELETE ALL AREAS WITHIN THE .CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FROM THE COUNTY STRUCTURAL FIRE TAX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1973-74 WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach no longer utilizes the services of the county fire stations in Midway City and . Sunset Beach, and has not required this service since July 1, 1964 , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the. City of Huntington Beach that it.. does request the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange to delete all areas within the .City of Huntington Beach from the- structural fire tax imposed by said county for the fiscal year 1973-74 • PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of. the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of March, 1973 • Mayor ATTEST: City Clerle APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cit Attor ey Res. No. 3647 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACII ) I , PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected_, qualified and acting City Clerk of toe City of Huntington Beach, and ex- officio 'Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of. the City of Huntington Beach- is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held_ on the 5th day of March 19 73 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Matney, .Duke, Coen. NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Green City Clerk and -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City. of Huntington Beach, California February 13 , 1973 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: County Structural Fire Tax for the Fiscal Year 1973-74 At the request of the City Administrator we transmit herewith resolution requesting the County Board of Supervisors to delete all areas within the City of Huntington Beach from the County structural fire tax for the fiscal year 1973-74 . The City of Huntington Beach no longer utilizes the services of the county fire stations in Midway City and Sunset Beach and has not required this service since July 1, 1964 . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney DPB:er I'E I VED NT V R K .fK, til HUHTINC R�rl "'.FACH,CALIF. S 140"Fl I RESOLU'.r'ION OF THE BOARD OF Sff-RffASp4z 9 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORIINIIA May 101 72 ail On motion of Supervisor Clark, duly second`-d and carried, the .7 51,11 following Resolution was adopted : 611 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the following C'it_-ies have filed for 7 exemption from taxation for county fEire protection services , pursuant to 8 Government Code Section 25643 : 9i Anaheim Garden Grove Placentia -r Brea Huntington Beach San Clemente 10 Buena Park Laguna Beach Santa Ana' - Costa Mesa La Habra Seal Beach 11 Fountain Valley Newport Beach Stanton Fullerton Orange Tustin 12 Westminster 13 BE'' IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above cities are hereby exempted 14 pursuant to section 25643. z 15 u 1 LL 6 IL ~ Z 0 Z D 0 0 17 it U 19 20 AYES : SUPERVISORS RALPH B. CLARK, RONALD W. CASPERS , R.W. BATTIN, DAVID L. BAKER AND WILLIAM J. PHILLIPS 21 NOES : SUPERVISORS NONE 22, ABSENT: SUPERVISORS NONE 23 F 24 STATE -OF CALIFORNIA ss .- ( 0TT7ZTV OP 0Q017nV 26 1, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify that 27 i the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the �l said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of 7 1 28 Mav 19 72 , and passed by a. unanimous vote of it said Board . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto,.-s"et and seal this 30 II 9th day of May 19 31 Resolution No . 72-476 , W L7"IAM:-.E:. ST-_,JOHN Grant Exemption for Struc- C6un�v Clerk and*-.*,--x-6 ff-icio Clerk 32 tural Fire Protection Tax f e" Board of.. Sup.-eYvisors of ,�i 22 Cities ,9,r- ,County.,.'-,County.,,` California lif omia TL :ls !I (C-ib\, F0192-32 B 3 T_ r' FEB 2 AU DITO RICONTROLLER EEC [L - HEM CS)� N�'� CD)� 2 197z FINANCE O BUILDING® CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 630 NORTH BROADWAY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE SANTA ANA6 CALIFORNIA 92702 A Ci'i F= TELEPHONE: 834-2450 AREA CODE 714 OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER February 17, 1972 City of Huntington Beach P . O. Box 711 Huntington Beach, California Attention: City Manager or Administrator Subject: Attorney General ' s Opinion #71-92 Gentlemen: The above-referenced Attorney General' s opinion (copy attached) deals with the refiling by cities for property tax exemption under the 1970 version of Government Code Sections 25642 and 25643. The opinion concludes that every city must refile sub- sequent to the effective date of the 1970 amendments to ! Sections 25642 and 25643 of the Government Code. If your city qualifies for an exemption from the County Structural Fire Protection Fund Tax Levy, please have your City Counsel pass the appropriate resolution and file with this office by April 17, 1972 . We will file the appropriate copies with the Board of Supervisors . Very truly yours, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER JDJ:dc Attach. FARE EIVE® FEB241972 :`NT i I w Car r y._ City of Huntington Beach �i)-- P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF "rHE CITY CLERK July 22, 1975 Board of Supervisors County of Orange. P. 0. Box 687 Santa Ana, California 92702 Gentlemen: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach .at its regular meeting held July 21, 1975 adopted Resolution No. 4105' requesting the County Board of Supervisors to delete all areas within the City of .Huntington Beach from .the County Structural Fire Tax for fiscal year 1975-76. We are enclosing a certified copy of said Resolution for your considera- tion. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:tlo Encl. RESOLUTION NO. 4105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO DELETE ALL AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FROM THE COUNTY STRUCTURAL FIRE TAX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1975-76 WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach no longer utilizes the services of the county fire stations in Midway City and Sunset Beach, and has not required this service since July 1, 1964, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that it does request the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange to delete all areas within the city of Huntington Beach from the structural fire tax im- posed by said county for the fiscal year 1975-76. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of. Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of July, 1975. ATTEST: O Alicia M—Wentworth APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk By: Deputy City Clerk City At orney. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: City Administrator ./ahb F-09 No. 4105 STAYS OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said' City, do hereby certify that the whole number of 1 members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council At a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of July 1975 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Wieder, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Duke, Gibbs NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California By - Deputy City Clerk r x : J� r 'rt City of Huntington Beach PP P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK March 6, 1974 Board of Supervisors County of Orange P.O. Box 687 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Gentlemen: The City .Council at its regular meeting-. held on. Monday, March 4, 1974, adopted. Resolution "No. 3853,. requesting the. County Board of . Supervisors to delete all .areas within the City of Huntington Beach from the County Structural Fire Tax for the.fiscal year" 1974-1975. . .Enclosed is a copy of said Resolution for your consideration. a Sincerely yours, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk By. 114 Deputy City Clerk AMW:cb enc.. RESOLUTION NO. 3853 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO DELETE ALL AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FROM THE COUNTY STRUCTURAL FIRE TAX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1974-75 WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach no longer utilizes the services of the county fire stations in Midway City and Sunset Beach, and has not required this service since July 1, 1954 , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that it does request the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange to delete all areas within the City of Huntington Beach from the structural fire tax imposed by said county for the fiscal year 1974-75• t PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of March, 1974 . M fy o rr Pro Tempore ATTEST: s -9'7 '. � �1 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City " ttorney /er ----------- ' No- 3853 r' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) CO UMT OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was .passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of. — March 19 74 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shiplev, .Gibbs, Green, Coen, Duke NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Bartlett, Matney City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California r February 14, 1974 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution Requesting County Board of Supervisors to Delete All Areas within City of Huntington Beach from County Structural Fire Tax for Fiscal Year 1974-75 At the request of the City Administrator, we transmit herewith resolution requesting County Board of Super- visors to delete all areas within the City of Huntington Beach from the County structural fire tax for the fiscal year 1974-75. The City of Huntington Beach no longer utilizes the services of- the county fire stations in Midway City and Sunset Beach and has not required this service since July 1, 1964 . Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney /er Attachment � 1 WHITE-CITY ATTORNEY %. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH No. BLUE-CITY CLERK GREEN-CITY ADMINISTRATOR CANARY-DEPARTMENTAL ; REQUEST for ORDINANCE or RESOLUTION Date Request made by Department 2-13-74 City Administrator Administration INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Administrator's Office quickly as possible but not later than noon, one week prior to the Council Meeting at which it is to be introduced. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney's use in preparation of ordinance. In a separate paragraph outline briefly reasons for the request of Council Action.Attach all papers pertinent to the subject.All appropriation requests must be cleared and approved by the Director of Finance before submitting to City Administrator's Office. Preparation of an Ordinance or.Resolution is hereby requested: Please prepare a resolution deleting all areas within the city of Huntington Beach from the County Structural Fire Tax for the fiscal year 1974-75 in accordance with the attached. Desired effective date Signed: Approved as to availability of funds Director of Finance City Attorney—Please prepare and submit printed copies to this office by: ity Administrator 266 ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINIONS [VoLumE 54 and a owner or contractor and a'tenant, regardless of the number of reside_ r dwelling units contained in the building in which the tenant, resides, it t e work is to be performed in, to,:;or upon the residence or dwelling unit such tenant,for the performance of a home improvement and includes A abor, services, and materials to be furnished and per- formed thereunder." § 7151.2 f The effect on a structure by nstallation of.the ducts,registers,blowers,flues,plenum chambers, thermostatic control and other appliances.requisite to a "complete Hi- S.- Efficiency remote type air conditioning system" is substantial. See section 746, . Rules and Regulations of the Contractors' State License Board (16 Cal. Admin. Code). The phrase "modernizing of,,•gr adding to, residential property' as used in section 7151,supra, thus includes, as Mere, the installation of systems which are permanently atixed to the realry. See sec rt art 7045; 51 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 1 (1968); Civil Code, section'660. We further.observe,nbat the offer. in questio specifies that the gift furnace varies in size depending on the air conditioning system purchased and is valued at $149.95 to $209.95. Therefore, the offer in question is not only improperly. conditioned upon obtaining a contract for home improve nt work, but also vioc lates the $5.00 limitation set by section 7026.9,subdivision ,supra. We conclude, therefore, that a contractor may not, consis nt with section 7026.9, offer a free forced air gas furnace to a purchaser of an a conditioning system inst Iced by the contractor: Opinion No. 71-92—December 21, 1971 SUBJECT: REFILING FOR PROPERTY, TAX EXEMPTION—Cities and dis- tricts providing their own fire protection must refile for property tax exemption under the 1970 version of the code section. Requested by: DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Opinion by: EVELLE J. YOUNGER,Attorney General _ Clayton P.Roche,Deputy The Honorable James G. Stearns, Director, Department of Conservation, has requested an opinion on the following question: Must a city-or district which has filed for property tax exemption for fire pro- tection pursuant to section 25643 of the Government Code prior to its repeal and- 'reenactment in 1970 refile under the provisions of such section as it now reads for conrinacd exemption?, 13aE tBER 1971) ATTORNEY k-4ERAL'S OPINIONS 267 The conclusion is: i Cities and districts must file under the newly enacted version of section 25643 of the Government Code to receive the benefit of the exemption provided therein. ANALYSIS Prior to their respective amendment, and repeal and reenactment in 1970, t sections 25642 and 25643 of the Government Code' read as follows: § 25642. "In addition to any sum chargeable to the county for the repayment of money expended by the State for protection against fire in the county, the board of supervisors may appropriate in any one year such stun of money as the board of supervisors deems necessary for the purpose of pro- tecting forest, brush and grass lands therein, against fire or other injury, and for aiding the•state and federal authorities in forestry work. Moneys appropriated pursuant to this section shall not be expended for.the pro- vision of structural fire protection." (Emphasis added.) ~ i§ 25643. "The board of supervisors in any county which provides county funds for strteitural fire protection of areas in the county in incorporated or unincorporated territory shall at the time of levying county taxes for sup-. - port of said function, except from the levy of any tax for said purpose all property within the limits of any incorporated city or any fire protec- tion district in said county, which has petitioned the board.of super- visors in writing for the exclusion of such property from the levy of taxes for such purpose, such petition to be supported by a resolution to be adopted by the governing body of such incorporated city or fire. -protection district finding that such incorporated.city or fire protection district has an organized fire deparment in operation and existence which is at such time providing adequate structural fire protection to all prop- erty within such incorporated city or fire protection district, and that no. additional benefit in fire protection is received or required by such prop- erty from structural fire protection given by the county. "Any petition to the board of supervisors to obtain the exemption provided in this section is sufficient to obtain the exemption in every year. If'the board of supervisors determines that the incorporated city or fire protection district no longer satisfies the elements of the resolution filed with the petition,"the exemption shall terminate and no exemption shall be granted until a new petition is presented." (Emphasis added.) 1 All section references are to the Government Code unless otherwise noted. Section 25642 was amended by Statutes of 1970,chapter.1342, and section 25643 was repealed and reenacted by Statutes of 1970,chapter 610. Section 25643 has been since amended by Statutes of 1971,chapter 471, as an urgency measure,effective August 4, 1971. ` ` 268 ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINIONS LVOLUME 54 Thus, prior to 1970, section. 25642 provided basically for the appropriation of county monies for fire protection of forest, brush, and grass lands, and section 25643 provided an exemption from property tax upon proper petition for cities and fire protection districts as,to property taxation for "structural fire protection" when the city or district provided its own adequate service. These sections 11ow read: - § 25642. r "The board of supervisors may appropriate in any one year such sum of money as the board of supervisors deems necessary for the purpose of providing fire protection:' § 25643. The board of supervisors of a county shall determine each year such sum of money as the board of supervisors deems necessary for fire protec- tion services within the county, excluding therefrom any city or district which is at such time providing fire protection services within such city or district. Except for the costs of forest,range,and watershed fire protec- tion within state responsibility areas as defined in Part 2 (commencing with Section 4101) of Division 4 of the Public Resources Code,for which the county is not reimbursed by the state,the taxes for the costs of county fire protection services shall be levied-only on property within the county. served by and benefiting from any county fire protection services, or such costs shall be paid from other nonproperty tax revenues collected within the unincorporated area of the county. "Every city or district which provides its own fire protection services, and which prior to March 1 of any year files with the board of super- visors of the county a-resolution declaring that such city or district is pro- viding fire protection services within its jurisdiction, shall not be assessed during the following fiscal year and any year thereafter for any portion of the costs of county fire protection services, except for the costs of forest, range, a;d watershed fire protection within state responsibility areas as defined in Part 2 (commencing with Section 4101) of Division 4 of the Public Resources Code, for which the comity is nob reimbursed by the state. "This section shall not apply to a county with a population of more than 1,000,000 but less than 6,000,000 according to the 1960 federal census" (Emphasis added.)2 Thus, section 25642 provides now for appropriation of county monies for "fire protection" generally (not basically just forest, brush and grass lands). and The underscored portion was added in 1971 to insure that the exemption was not construed.to apply to the lands described in such clause. Section 2 of Chapter 471 of the Statutes of 1971 pointed out that this clause was a clari5cation of existing law. The last pars- Graph was amended so as to substitute the present language for a county of the second class. Orherwise, section 25643 reads now as it(lid vviie❑ repealed and reenacted in 1970. 71 rs ,f DKgNIBER 1971) ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINIONS •269 section 25643 provides for an exemption from property taxation upon the proper filing for the costs of county fire protection service, and not merely an exemption for structural fire protection. The.question presented is whether a city or districr,which filed for exemption. under_section 25643 prior to its reenactment in 1970 must refile in order to be exempt under 25643 as it presently reads. - In our view, refiling is necessary.- A comparison of the section in question as.it read prior to 1970,and as repealed and reenacted demonstrates several things. First, the section as reenacted, contains no grandfather clause for pre-1970 filings, and secondly, the scope of sections as to both the facts giving rise to the filing and the exemption are different. The section previously required only a representation that the city or district was providing adequate "structural fire protection" for a concomitant property tax exemption. Now the section contemplates a warranty as to the providing of "fire protection services' in general for basically a concomitant and apparently expanded property tax exemption. We therefore conclude that a .petition filed prior to the 1970 reenactment of section 25643 is not sufficient to continue in effect the exemption presently provided by the section. - Opinion No.CV71-202=December 22, 197>,alary SUBJECT: TEA HERS' PAY—School districts may begi payments to teachers on J 1st, prior to actual commencement of services in September. Requested by: SEN OR, 20TH DISTRICT Opinion by: EVEUE J. OUNGER,Attorn General Edmund E.W 'te,Deputy " "The Honorable William E. ombs.- enator,Twentieth District,has requested an opinion on the following questio Does section *13517 et ,seq. o�rh Education Code authorize payments for July and August totaling V6 (the an lal salary of a ten month certificated employee prior to comment ent of servic in September? The conclusion is: l The governing and of a school district is uthorized to pay certificated employees in twel�y- equal monthly payment's for the. chool year commencing on the first of July, , ether or not such persons are actually a aged in teaching"during the month." E ication Code, sections 13517 and 13518,au orizes salary payments for July an August, prior to the employee's commencement f actual services in '�? Septembe March 7, 1972 Board of Supervisors County of Orange P. 0. Box 687 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Gentlemen: The City Council At its regular meeting held on March 6, 1972, adopted Resolution 3451, requesting the County Board of Supervisors to delete all areas within the City of Huntington Beach from the County Structural Fire Tax for the fiscal year 1972-1973. Enclosed is a copy of said Resolution for your con- sideration. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aW Encl. i4A HEIM FEB 2 2 1972 AUDITOR-CONTROLLER QUNTY OF FINANCE BUILDING iN piYbF:�HUNTIMGTON BEACH 630 NORTH BROADWAY P. O. BOX 567 '' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE SANTA ANA, C-ALIFORNIA 92702 yet s� iAN G E �- TELEPHONE: 834-2430 AREA CODE 714 ry•_ OFFICE OF AUDITOR-CONTROLLER February 17, - 1972 'j City of Huntington Beach 'a P . 0. Box 711 Huntington Beach, California => Attention: City Manager or Administrator Subject: Attorney General' s Opinion #71-92 Gentlemen: The above-referenced Attorney General' s opinion (copy attached) deals with .the refiling by cities for property tax exemption under the 1970 version of Government Code Sections 25642 and 25643. The opinion concludes that every city must refile sub- °; Sequent to the effective date of. the 1970 amendments to € ! Sections 25642 and 25643 of the Government Code. If your city qualifies for an exemption from the County Structural Fire Protection- Fund Tax Levy, please have your ' 4 City Counsel pass the appropriate resolution and file with this office by April 17, 1972 . We will file the appropriate copies with the Board. of Supervisors. Very truly yours, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER JDJ:dc } '. Attach. RECEIVED ;i FEB 241972 ANT FIRE DEI* t �C_�1�'�! ..��.l.l�`['.,.Y7!•.'.L•-.7 - ..--y1•."_c.e ••r Yi•+ _- .. a"'^7'!14►R'T`m el?^ .. •.t+e-t^+r.....a-+!••: -.r...� 'n n+lw �I1:.X� 1'' 4 Ci 266 ATTO 'r,..y GENERAL'S OPINION 1VoLums 54 and a owner or contractor and a-tenant, regardless of the number of residen r dwelling units contained in- the building in which the tenant. resides, i� t e work is to be performed in, to, or upon the residence or dwelling unit such tenant,for the performance of a home improvement and includes alr\abor, services, and materials to be furnished and ,per- formed thereundeXbvy 7151.2 t The effect on a structurnstallation of the ducts,registers,blowers,flues,plenum G chambers, thermostatic controls,,and ocher appliances requisite to a "complete Hi- Efficiency remote; type air conditioning system' is substantial. .See section 746, Rules and Regulations of the Contractors' State License Board (16 Cal. Admin.' Code). The phrase "modernizing of, rr adding to, residential property" as used ; in section 7151,Jirpra, thus includes, as here, the installation of systems which are permanently aflixcd to the realty.'See scc) 7045; 51 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 1 (1968); Civil Code, section'660. We further observe that the offer in quescio specifies that the gift furnace •` varies in size depending on the air conditioning sysre purchased and is valued at $149.95 to $209.95 Therefore, the offer in quescio_ is not only improperly conditioned upon obtaining a contract for home improve nt work, but also vio- ` lcres the $5.00 limitation set by section 7026.9,subdivision (rr ,Jupra, fu 'WC conclude, therefore, that a contractor may not, consis •nt with section �{ 7026.9, offer h free forced air gas furnace to a purchaser of an a conditioning System insr2lfed by the contractor, Opinion No. 71-92—December 21, 1971 SUBJECT: ]ZETILING FOR PROPERTY, TAX EXEMPTION—Cities and dis- ;.;• tricts providing(heir own fire protection must tef(le for property tax exemption under the 1970 version of the code section. Via, Ilequcsfod by: DllkVCTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION ' Opinion by: EVELLE J. YOUNGIiR, Attorney General Clayton R Ruche,Deputy 'I-he 1-fonurable Janus G. Stearns, Director, Deparancot of Cunscrvarion; has requested an opinion on the following question: Must a city.or district which has filed for property tax exemption for fire pro- tection pursuanc to section-25643 of the Government Code prior to its repeal and rven:tccmcnt in 1970 rrhi _under the 1)r6yisi4ns of such ;ertion as it now reads for -1 ���nrinucd izcanpcian? _. . DEI:t•:.\tUL'rt 19711 A-170� ENERAL'S OPINIONS 267 The conclusion is: Cities and districts 111rtSt it IC under.rlic rie..Wly enaCc�i version of sectiun 25643 +� of the Government Code to-ieceive the benefit of the exemption provided therein. ANALYSIS Prior to their respective. amendment, and.repeal and reenactment in 1970, sections 25642 and 25643 of tht:Governmenc Codes read as follows: § 25642. "In addition-to any Burn chargeable to the county for the repayment of money expended by the State for protection against fire.in the county, ' the board of supervisors niq appropriate in any one year sueh sutn of money as the board of supervisors deems necessary for the purpose of pro- tecting forest, brujh and gr ur lands therein, against fire or.other injury, and for aiding the stare and federal authorities in forestry work. Moneys appropriated pursuant to this section shall not be expended for.the pro- vision of,structural fire protection." (Emphasis-added.) r§ 25643 ; "The board of supervisors in any county which,provides county funds for ttrui coral fire protection of areas in the county in incorporated'or �Junincorporated'rerr'itdry.shall at thc-time of levying eountytaxes for sup-. .J port of said function, except from the levy of any tax for said purpose all properly «;ithin die limits of any incorporated city or any fire prorec- tion district in said county, which-.has petitioned the board of super. ! visors in writing for the exclusion of such property from the levy of 'taxes for such purpose, such petition to be supported by a resolution to be adopted by the governing body, of such incorporated city or fire } 'protection district finding.thac such incorporated. city or fire protection district has an organized fire dcpar,nent in operation and existence which is at such rime providing adequate rtruaural fire protection to all prop- 1. erty within such incorporated city or fire-protection district., and that no additional benefit in fire protection is received or required by such prop• b' erty from structural fire protection given by the county. "Any petition to the board.of supervisors'to obtain the exemption provided-in this section is sufficient to obtain the exemption in every year. lf'the hoard of supervisors determines that the incorporated city or fire protection district no longer ski'sties the elements of the resolution filed with thee patriot), the exemption shall terminate and no exemption shall be granted until a new petition is presented." (Emphasis added.) 'All section references are to the Government Code unless otherwise noted. .Section ' 25642 was amended by Statutes of 1970,chapter 1342, and section 25643 was repealed and 'reenacted by Statutes of 1970,chapter 610. Section 25643 has been since amended by Statutes of 1971;chapter 471, ns an urgency measure, effective August A, 1971. ( [VOLUME 54 rti8 A17ORN TERAL'S OPINIONS } Thus, prior to 1970,.section 25642 provided basically for the appropriation of county monies for fire protection of forest, brush, and grass lands, and section 25643 provided an exemption from property tax 'upon proper petition for cities and fire protection districts as to property taxation for "structural fire protection" when the city or district provided its own adequate service. These sections now F read: - § 25642., i "The.board of supervisors may appropriate in any one year such sum of money as the board of supervisors deems necessary for the purpose of providing fire protection." 1 § 25643. "The board of supervisors of a.county shall determine each year such . SLIM of money as the board of supervisors deems necessary for fire protec- tion services within the county, excluding therefrom any city or district which is at.such time providing fire.protection services within such city or district. Except for the costs of forest,range,and watershed fire protec• tion within state responsibility areas as defined in Part 2. (commencing with Section 4101) of Division 4 of the Public Resources Code, for which the county is not reimbursed'by the stare, the taxes for the costs of county fire protection services shall be levied only on property within the county, served by and benefiting from any county fire protection services, or such �\ costs shall.be paid from other nonproperty tax revenues collected within JJ the unincorporated area of the county. "Every city or district which provides its own fire protection services, .T and which prior to March 1 of any year files with the board of super- visors of the county a resolution declaring that such city or district is pro- viding fire protection services within its jurisdiction, shall not be assessed. during the following fiscal year and any year thereafter for any portion of the,eosts of county fire protection services, except for the cortr of forest, range, and watershed fire protection within state rerpontibility areas ar defined in Part 2 (coil,illencing with Section 4101) of Division 4 of the Public Resources Code, for which the comity is not reimhursed by the Nate. ` "This section shall not apply to a county with a population of more titan 1,000,000 but less than 6,000,000 according to the 1960 federal census." (Emphasis added.)' Thus, section 256,12 provides now .for ipproprintion of county monies for "fire protection" generally (not basically just forest„brush and grass lands) and The underscored portion \\•as -dried in 1971 to insure that the esc:nption was not construed to apply to the Ian,is described in such clause. Section 2 of Chapter 471 of the Statures of 1971 pointed our tl''r chic clause teas a clarification of existing; 1.1w. 'The last para- •er.a•h was aurendcd so as o, so:, :itutc dtc I1r0'nt I m ikimce for a connty of the second class. j4 , Chhctwisr, s^CtiC:n 25643 JS ii d4.1 \ciu:u etl•ralcd and rccaacred in 1970, l:-- id: tit. ;M DECEMBER 19711 1 EY GENERAL'S OPINIONS •_ 269 section 25643 provides for an exeinpuon from propercy rixauon upon the proper filing for the costs of county fire protection service, an l not merely an.exemption for structural fire protection. The question presented is whether a city or district, which filed for exemption under.section 25643 prior to its reenactment in 1970 must refile in order to be exempt under 25643 as it presently reads. In our view, refiling is necessary. A comparison of the section in question as it read prior to 1970,and as repealed and reenacted demonstrates several things. First, the section as reenacted, contains no grandfather clause for pre-1970 filings, and secondly, the scope of sections as to both the facts giving rise to the filing and the exemption are different. The section previously required only a representation that the city or district was providing adequate "structural fire protection" for a concomitant property tax exemption. Now the section contemplates a warranty as to the providing of "fire protection services' in general for basically a concomitant and apparently expanded property tax exemption. We therefore conclude that a petition fled prior cq the 1970 reenactment of section 25643 is not sufficient to continue in effect the exemption presently provided by the section. Opinion No. CV71-202—December 22, 1971/ SUBJECT: TEA 'HERS' PAY—School districts may begio'salary payments to teachers on J lst, prior to actual commencement of services in September. Requested by: SEN \qh H DISTRICT/Gencral Opinion by: EVELLEGER,Attorny Edmund Deputy Zenator The Honorable Wombs , Twentieth District, has requested an opinion on the folloio •� Does section *1351arch Education Code authorize payments for July and August totalihe an ial salary of a ten mooch certificated employee prior to comment enr of servic in September? The conclusion/ard s" The governinf a school district is �udiorized to pay certificated employees in twel�/yv . onchly payments for the s\chool year commencing on the first of July, "P/ether or not such persons are actually eft aged in teaching"during the month." E cation Code, sections 13517 and 13513,au orizes salary payments for July an August, prior to the employee's commencement ; actual services in v Septembe RESOLUTION OF-THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - 2I -_-- -- -----OF--ORANGE-COUINTTX, CALIFORNIA ------ - - -- - - -- June 16, 1970 4 On mot-ion of Super-v;tsnr Hirstein, duly seconded and carried, the 5 followi.ng Resolution was- adopted: 6 WHEREAS,--pursuant to Government Code Section 25643, the following 7 named cities presented resolutions and petitions to this Board during 8 1968 requesting the exclusion of all properties within the limits of 9 said cities from the levy of any tax levied for the purpose of providing 10 structural ;fire protection by the County of Orange for 'the fiscal year 11 1968-69; and 12 WHEREAS, this Board . finds that each of the following named cities 13 continues to satisfy the requirements of Government Code Section 25643 i 14 and the elemienes of their respective resolutions and petitions filed 4IT 15 with this Board during 1968; 'a'� - >016 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED_ AND ORDERED that pursuant to OZa ° 17 Government Code Self ion. 25643, all properties within the limits of the 181 following named cities are exempt from the levy of any tax levied for 19II tile fiscal year 197E-71 by the County of Orange for structural fire jpro- 20 tection purposes: 21 Anaheim Newport Beach - Brea Orange 22 Buena Park Placentia Costa Mesa San Clemente - ---- 23 Fountain---Va1le - -- Santa Ana Fullerton Seal Beach 24 Garden Grove Stanton 25 Huntington Beach Tustin Laguna Reach Westminster 26 La Habra 27 28 29 AYES : SUPERVISORS WM. HIRSTEIN, WILLIAM J. PHILLIPS , AND DAVID L. BAKER 30 NOES: SUPERVISORS NONE 31 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS ROBERT W. BATTIN AND ALTON' E. ALLEN 32 Resolution No. 70-665 VTB:kls Authorize Exemption Frozrr - County's Tax Levy For Structural Fire Protection i . 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. 2 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 3 I, W. E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board 4 of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify that the 5 above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the . 6 said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of 7 June , 1970 , and passed by a unanimous vote 8 of said Board members present. 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 10 16th day of June , 1970. 11 - 12 W. E. ST JOHN County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk 13 of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, Calif6r4ia,. 14 Y 15 By '� o ;x UUS 16 7 Deputy u OZ< _ 00 17 I ` 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 - 32 2 . MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ,Tune 4, 1968 IN RE: AUTHORIZE STUDY AIRLINE FUEL FLOWAGE FEES AND LANDING FEES ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT On motion of Supervisor Phillips, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the letter from the Director of Aviation, Orange County Airport,. dated May 17, 1968, proposing the cancellation of Airline Fuel Flowage Fees and Landing Fees, is ordered referred to the County Administrative Officer for complete study and report to the Board of Supervisors for approval . IN RE: SUPERVISOR BAKER APPOINTED AS MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA DELEGATION ON REQUIRED WELFARE RESIDENCY On motion of Supervisor Allen, duly seconded and unanimously _ carried, Supervisor Baker<is- appointed as a member of the California Delegation on required Welfare residency emergency tax force and is authorized to attend meetings . as scheduled, with the County of Orange to pay the necessary expenses. IN RE: REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION OF LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION On motion of Supervisor Hirstein, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Resolutions of the following- City Councils requesting the exclusion of properties within said Cities from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural fire protection are received and ordered filed. Resolution NQ. City 4814 Fullerton 2752 _ _. ,Huntington Beach 68R-277 Anaheim. F 1013-2.2 - - M4y 24, 1968 A County Board of Supervisors County of orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, California Gentlemen: The City Council of the City of Runtington Beach, at `heir regular meeting held on Monday, .May 24, 1968, passed and adopted Resolution No. 2752 requesting the Board of Supervisors to deltte all areas within the City of Iiuntington Beach From the County Structural Fire Tax ® for the Fiscal Year 1968-1969. Enclosed please find a certified copy of Resolution No. 2752 for your consideration and action. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ.cb Enc. i i i FF RESOLUTION NO. 2752 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO DELETE ALL AREAS WITH- IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FROM THE- COUNTY STRUCTURAL FIRE TAX FOR THE' FISCAL YEAR, 1968-1969 WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach no longer utilizes the services Of the county fire stations in Midway City and Sunset Beach, and has not required this service since July 1, 19643 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that it does request- the Board of Super- visors of the County of Orange to delete all areas within the City 'of Huntington Beach from the. structural fire tax imposed by said county .f.or the fiscal year 1968-1969. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of May, 1968. /S/ Alvin M. Coen Mayor ATTEST: /S j Paul C.__ ..TTnnugg City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: "Assistant City Attorney Res. No. :. 2752 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss : CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected , qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than -.a majority of all the members of said City Council at .a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of May , 19 kL_, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, McCracken, Kaufman, Matney, Green, Coen NOES: Councilmen: r None ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley /S/ Paul C. Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Th ?i',g in5_i-Meet is a correct Crop ei Gii; .S%e fn this office. �t Clerh',,and Ex-of to Clerk of the City C6*i3 Of Vie Citi,of Huntingdon Beach Cat. Rd p�€�tv MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 9, 1967 IN .RE: REQUESTS FOR EXEMPTION FROM LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION On motion of Supervisor Featherly, duly seconded and unanimously . carried, Resolutions of the City Councils of the following cities requesting the exemption of property within said cities from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural fire protection are received and ordered filed: CITY RESOLUTION NO. Seal Beach 1545 Fountain Valley 4025 San Clemente 38-67 Huntington Beach 2559 IN RE: PROPOSED SELECTION OF ENGINEERING FIRM ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SYCAMORE FLAT REGIONAL PARK On motion of Supervisor Featherly, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the Director of Parks is directed to accept proposals from engineering firms for engineering and development services for Sycamore Flat Regional Park until May 19, i967, and make recommendation of three. qualified firms to the Board of Supervisors to make their selection on May 23, 1967. IN RE: AGREEMENT ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES CITY OF STANTON On motion of Supervisor Phillips, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the Chairman and the Clerk are authorized to sign the Agreement dated May 9, 1967, between the County of Orange and the City of Stanton, for Complete Animal Control Services. IN RE: AGREEMENT ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES CITY OF PLACENTIA On motion of Supervisor Phillips, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the Chairman and the Clerk are authorized to sign the Agreement dated May 9, 1967, between the County of Orange and the City of Placentia, for Complete Animal Control Services. F 1013-2.1 I - INGRA Tp�, CITY OF - - CALIFORNIA yc Q #909iP' �O �CDUNTY GP\\ May 3, 1967 O County Board of Supervisors County of Orange P.O. Box 8ja Santa Ana, California Gent lemen: The City Council of the City of Huntington Reach, at their regular meeting held on Monday, i6y_ 1, 1967,, passed and adopted Resolution No. 2559 requesting the Board of Super- visors to delete all areas within the City of Huntington Beach from the County Structural Fire Tax for the Fiscal Year 1967-1968. , Enclosed please find a certified copy of Resolution No. 2559 for' your consideration and action. Sincerely yours, f t i Paul C. Jones City Clerk ICJ t aw Enc. f MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA May 10, 1966 IN RE: REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Resolution No. 2358 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, requesting the exemption of property within the City of Huntington Beach from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural fire protection, is received and ordered filed. IN RE: REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF FULLERTON On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Resolution No. 4485 of the City Council of the City of Fullerton, requesting the exemption of property within the City of Fullerton from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural f ire protection, is received and ordered filed. IN RE: REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Resolution No. 1854 of the City Council of the City of San Clemente, requesting the exemption of property within the City of San Clemente from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural fire protection, is received and ordered filed. IN RE: REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Resolution No. 3072 of the. City Council of the City of Fountain Valley, requesting the exemption of property within the City of Fountain Valley from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural fire protection, is received and ordered filed.. F1013-2.1 - i r 2 3 RKSOLUTION $00 2358 4 A BESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO IL OF THS "It CITY OF MUMTMOTOb BEACH !',',,EQMZTIWG THE 5 COMY BOARD OF SUPS IRVISORS TO DELETE A,LL AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OP HUNTINOTON 6 AC R MOM THE COUNTY STRUCTURAL FIRE TAX FOR THE PISCAL TEA 1966-1967, 7 8 WHEREAS9 the City C0un411 of the City Of RMUtlngtOn 9 Seeah no longer needs to utilize the serviess of the County 10 Fire Stations In Ridway (3ty and Sunset Besoh so of July 11 it, 1964. that the City of Hunt- 12 MOW9 THEREFOREs BE ITRLSOLIED 13 ington besoh does 'hereby request the County Board of Super- 14 visors of Orange County to delete all areas within the City 15 of Huntington beach from the County Structural Fire Tax is. 16 posed by said County for the fiscal year 1966.1967* 17 PASSED AND ADOPTID by the City C"otmail of the City of 18 Huntington Beach at a regular meeting of the City Council 19 held on the 2nd day of may,, 1966". 20 21 Jake R. Stewart 22 eyor ATMTs 23 Paul C. Jones 24 a ogee ; SD AS TO FORKs City Clerk 25 K. DALE BjjSH 26 DTL"R. .BUSHs 27 City Attorney 28 29 30 , r - 1 2 Res . No . 2 58 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4 COUNTY OF ORANGE ss : 5 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 6 I , PAUL C . JONES , the duly elected, qualified and 7 acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- 8 officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby 9 certify that the whole number of members of the City Council 10 of the City _of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of 11 more than a majority of all the members of said City Council 12 at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of May , 13 19 66. , by the following vote : 14 YES : Councilmen: 15 16 Coen Bartlett Gisler Green Shipley, Kaufman, Stewart 17NOES : Councilmen: 18 None 19 ABSENT : Councilmen: 20 None 21 22 23 Paul C. Jones City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk 24 of the City Council of the City 25 of Huntington Beach, California 26 27 28 29 30 May 49 1966 County Board of Supervisors County of grange P. ©. Box 828 6anka Dina, California Gentlemen: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at their regular meeting held on May 2, 1966, passed and adopted Resolution No 2358, request- ing the Board of Supervisors to delete all areas within the City of Huntington € each from the County .Structural Fire Tax for the Fiscal year 1966-1967. Enclosed please find copy of Resolution No. 2358 for your consideration and action. Sincerely yours, Paul C o ,tones City Clerk PCJsed Inc : 1 I' r 2 3 1 OLU l eN Nei. 2355 CITI OF TIUNTIXOTOk9,UC9 -REQUESTING A" IT CSURT- INGTOR 6 figACH PROM SHE COUNTY ;STRUCTURAL FIRE 7 8 ' $ the City counell of the City of fluntIngton 9 Semah no 1 .wr needs to utilize the services of the County 10 Pire Stations in V idw y City OVA Sunset 0680h 0-0 of July 11 1 o 1964. 12 NOW10 THEREF RS9 B2 IT ''RES00 th t, the City of Hunt. 13 in ton asoob does hereby request the CouAty Soord of Super. 14 visors of Orange County to delete el.1 arose within the Cilty 15 of Nuati „to . S aah from the County Struatural Fire Tax Is- posed 16 by sold County for the fiscal yeor 1966-1967. E 17 AS W AND Ai x A by the pity Coutail of the City of R 18 Suatingtoo Stach st a regular meeting of the City Counall 19 hold on the god day of May, 19 6. i 20 21 Jake R. Stewart 22 23 24 PmA C Jo e City 'Clark 25 K: DALE BUSH 26 27 City Attorney 28 29 30 1. l r _ 4r 2 Res . No . .2358 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4 COUNTY OF ORANGE ss : 5 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 6 I , PAUL C . JONES , the duly elected, qualified and 7 acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- 8 officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby 9 certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing 10 resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of 11 more than a majority of all the members of said City Council 12 at a regular meeting .thereof held on the 2nd day of May 13 19 66 , by the following vote : 14 AYES : Councilmen: 15 16 Coen Bartlett Gisler Green Shipley, Kaufman, Stewart 17 NOES : Councilmen: 18 None 19 ABSENT : Councilmen: 20 None 21 22 23 Paul C. Jones A City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk 24 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California 25 26 i 27 ' 28 ' 29 30 Job f MAIES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVIRS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March 23, 1965 A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, also sitting as the Governing Board of the Districts governed by the Board of Supervisors was held March 23, 1965 1965, at 9:30 A.M. The following members being present: Wm. Hirstein, Chairman; C. M. Featherly, David L. Baker, William J. Phillips, Alton E. Allen and the Clerk. IN RE: REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF HUNTINOTON BEACH On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unan- imously carried, Resolution No. 2140, of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach requesting the exemption of property within the City of Huntington Beach from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural fire protection, is received and ordered filed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. County of Orange I, W. E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the minute entry on record in this office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 23rd day of March, 1965. W. E. ST JOHN County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California F1O13-1 FZ f .. RESOLUTION No. 2140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING THE COUVff BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO DELETE ALL AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FROM THE COUNTY STRUCTURAL FIRE TAX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR, 1965 4. 1966. WHEBE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beech no longer needs to utilize the services of the County Fire Stations in Midway City and Smset Beach as of July 1, 1964. NOW9 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hunt. ington Beech does hereby request the County Board of Super. visors of Orange County to delete all areas within the City of Huntington Beech from the County Structural Fire Tex in. posed by said County for the fiscal year 1965_1966, PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beech at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 15th day of March , 1965- or ATTES� City le APXRMW AS t J ES A. PL jETT;j t eorgs ShMta Asst.City Attorney 1• s+a Res. No. 2140 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is five; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the, ,day of Marc® , 1965, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Welch, Gisler, Stewart, Lambert, Shipley NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None Cl—ty--Merkan -officio Clerk of the City C uncil of the City of Huntington Beach, California mlitrES OF THE BOARD OF SUM �t 30RS f$ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 9, 1964 A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, also sitting as the Governing Board of the Districts governed by the Board of Supervisors, was held June 9, 1964 , at 9:30 A.M. The following named members being present: C. M. Fe:atherly, ` ice-Ma rman, David L. Baker, V!m. Hirstein, Alton E. Allen and the Clark. Absent: William J. Phillips, Chairman Supervisor Allen called from the meeting. IN RE s REQUEST FOR DELETION FROM LEVY OF TAX FOR STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION CITY OF HUN'TINGTON BEACH On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members present, Resolution, No. 1976 of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, requesting the deletion of property within the City of Huntington Beach from the levy of any Orange County tax to provide structural fire pro- tection is received and ordered filed. N STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ss. County of Orange I, W. E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the minute entry on record in this office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 9th day of June, 1964 10 W. E. ST JOHN County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California F1013-2