The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAdopt Resolution No. 2018-85 amending the existing DevelopmePage 2 Exhibit A Resolution No. 2018-85 Schedule of Rates for Traffic Impact Fees (per Resolution 2012-23 and amended on 12/17/18 to include ADU DIF) Adjusted Average Trip -end to Additional Cost per Cost per 1000 sq. ft, Land Use Trip Ends Distance Trip Trip Miles Trip Mile dwelling unit or other unit RESIDENTIAL LAND USES (per Unit) Detached Dwelling Unit 8.76 7.9 0.5 Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 Condominium/ 5.36 7.9 0.5 Townhouse Accessory Dwelling Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 RESORT/TOURIST (per Unit or Entry Door) Hotel 6.29 7.6 All Suites Hotel 3.77 7.6 Motel 4.34 7.6 INDUSTRIAL ( per 1,000 SF) General Light Industrial 0.1/ Heavy Industrial 5.97 Manufacturing 2.73 Warehousing 4.39 COMMERCIAL (per 1,000 SF) Office Park 7.42 Research Park 5.01 Business Park 9.34 Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store Garden Center Movie Theater Church Medical -Dental Office General Office Building Shopping Center Hospital Discount Center High -Turnover Restaurant Convenience Market 'Office Park OTHER (as noted) 'Cemetery Service Station/Market �(avg) Service Station w/Car 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 34.6 $ 64.34 $ 24.3 $ 64.34 $ 21.2 $ 64.34 $ 18.1 $ 64.34 $ 23.9 $ 64.34 $ 14.3 $ 64.34 $ 16.5 $ 64.34 $ 27.8 $ 64.34 $ 26.9 $ 64.34 $ 12.3 $ 64.34 $ 19.8 $ 64.34 $ 8.8 0.51 32.6 $ 64.34 1 $ 8.8 0.5 22.0 $ 64.34 $ 8.8 0.51 41.1 $ 64.34 $ 4.31 0.5 63.11 $ 64.34 1 $ 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $ 64.34 $ 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $ 64.34 $ 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 $ 64.34 $ 22.21 8.8 0.5 97.7 $ 64.34 $ 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $ 64.34 $ 30.2 4.3 0.5 64.9 $ 64.34 $ 11.42 4.3 0.5 24.6 $ 64.34 $ 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $ 64.34 $ 8.9 4.3 0.5 19.1 $ 64.34 $ 43.571 4.31 0.5 93.7 $ 64.34 $ 13.971 4.31 0.51 30.0 $ 64.34 $ 3.07 4.3 107.69 4.3 99.35 4.3 2,226.16 /Unit 1,563.46 /Unit 1,364.01 /Unit 341.00 /Unit 1,164.55 /Unit 1,537.73 /Room 920.06 /Room 1,061.61 /Room 1,788.65 /1,000 sf 1,730.75 /1,000 sf 791.38 /1,000 sf 1,273.93 /1,000 sf 2,097.48 /1,000 sf 1,415.48 /1,000 sf 2,644.37 /1,000 sf 4.059.85 1 /1.000 sf 3,242.74 /1,000 sf 341.00 /1,000 sf 817.12 /1,000 sf 6,286.02 /1,000 sf 2,026.71 /1,000 sf 4,175.67 /1,000 sf 1,582.76 /1,000 sf 8,705.20 /1,000 sf 1,228.89 /1,000 sf 6,028.66 /1,000 sf 1.930.20 /1.000 sf 0.5 6.6 $ 64.34 $ 424.64 /Acre /Fuel 0.5 231.5 $ 64.34 $ 14,894.71 Position /Fuel 0.5 213.6 $ 64.34 $ 13,743.02 Position City of Huntington Beach Accessory Dwelling Unit DIF Calculation Report December, 2018 impact. Therefore, to be conservative, it is recommended that the City adopt an ADU fee that is only 25% of the attached dwelling unit DIF. This action would recognize that an individual ADU will have some impact on City services but would allow the City to recognize the State Legislature's encouragement that cities and counties consider the spirit/intent of the new ADU laws, that is to create additional smaller housing supply alternatives without overwhelming financial barriers. The fee has to be separated into the five individual impact fees identified in the 2012 report and resolution. Table 1, following, demonstrates this. Table 1-1 Calculation of an Attached Dwelling Unit Per Imposed Infrastructure -based Development Impact Fee Infrastructure Calculated Development Impact Fee Percent of DIF Imposed Adopted Impact Fee/Unit City Staff Recommended Percentage DIF Impact Cost Per ADU Law Enforcement $815 90.1 % $734 25.0% $183.50 Fire Suppression $382 90.1 % $344 25.0% $86.00 Circulation System $1,657 96.4% $1,597 25.0% $399.25 Storm Drainage $397 0.0% $0 25.0% $0.00 Library Facilities $908 93.8% $852 25.0% $213.00 Park Land et. al. $13,835 90.5% $12,520 25.0% $3,130.00 Total $17,994 89.2% $16,047 25.0% $4,011.75 The five required Government Code §66000 findings within each chapter would apply to the imposition/collection of ADUs DIFs also. The fees collected would be used to finance the same projects specifically identified in each corresponding infrastructure chapter in the 2012 DIF Calculation and Nexus Report. The portion of the DIF proceeds for Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Infrastructure (about 4.6% of the total) would be limited to projects identified on Schedule 3.1, page 37 of the 2012 DIF Calculation and Nexus Report or pages 6 through 9 of the accompanying 2012 Master Facilities Plan. The portion of the DIF proceeds for Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment infrastructure (about 2.1% of the total) would be limited to projects identified on Schedule 4.1, page 51 of the 2012 DIF Calculation and Nexus Report or pages 12 through 17 of the accompanying 2012 Master Facilities Plan. Revenue and Cost Service, LLC, Fullerton CA, 92831 7 833 Page 2 10/17/11 (amended 04127112) Letter to the Huntington Beach City Council and Staff Adoption of the recommended impact fees contained herein and imposition upon the numerous development opportunities in the City of Huntington Beach, would generate approximately $172.1 million in a combination of public improvement dedications and DIF revenues limited for use on the many capital expansion projects deemed as development generated. Existing Impact Fee Fund balances ($3.5 million) and other revenues sources ($23.0 million) make up a significant amount of the difference between the capital total and the total revenue sources. This leaves a shortfall of $204.8 million (95 % of which is $194.4 million in unfunded storm drainage projects). The identification of $403.4 million in capital needs mostly generated by new development, is not to be taken lightly, but must be examined in perspective to the cost of existing infrastructure, facilities, vehicles and equipment that a new development will share in the use and enjoyment of upon City review, approval, construction and finally, occupancy. To offer such a perspective, a major element in this Report is a proportional analysis, or comparison of what is being asked of future residents, in the form of dedicated public improvements or an in -lieu (impact fee) payment, with the cost of the City's existing infrastructure (land, facilities, and equipment), contributed by the existing population and business community. The dedications, taxes and assessments contributed to date by the existing community over numerous decades of development have generated just over $2.1 billion (at current replacement costs) in infrastructure or capital improvements to the City of Huntington Beach. The following table identifies those existing asset commitments (or equity if you will), by infrastructure. - ' -: -,-�:- = urgent• E tti _ Service, Proyded ; . - _ Investment _.._- Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment $71,246,699 Fire Suppress ion/Medic Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment $61,234,227 Circulation (Street, Signals and Bridges) System $533,539,375 Storm Drainage Collection System $203,631,313 Public Library Facilities and Collection $76,593,112 Park Land and Park Facilities Development $1,166,934,162 Total Existing Infrastructure Replacement Investment $2,113,178,888 837 Chapter One Background and Introduction AB 1600) takes only two pages of text to describe the findings that development impact fees must adequately make, but does not explain specifically how to do so. Most DIF calculations will identify the desired or needed capital projects, ostensibly required as a result of the new development. Therefore, what is fair and equitable? Is it fair to require future residents and businesses in a city to construct, via payment of impact fees, a new Police Station when the current station is merely rented or leased space? On the other hand, if a community already has all of the water utility system they will need at build -out, are they precluded from imposing an impact fee to recoup some of that expenses incurred in the construction of the maximum needed water utility improvements prior to need for the maximum demand? These are difficult questions that may be made clearer and easier by reviewing the following examples. Comparison of Needed Infrastructure with Existing Infrastructure. The answer to these difficult questions may best be answered by comparing various infrastructure scenarios. This can be accomplished by looking closely at our friends in the planned community of Happy Valley3 for a few scenarios to explain the three possible conditions that can occur regarding the agency's current infrastructure and the demand upon them. We will use the provision of fire protection, a service that most of us as nonprofessional fire fighters can somewhat understand. These three "conditions" include that the fire suppression system infrastructure construction has: 1. been On -target. 2. been Deficient. Or; 3. created Excess Service Capacity. Adoption of a Standard - According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), a standard two -bay fire station (estimated for purposes of this example to cost about $3,000,000) can meet the needs of roughly 5,000 homes or 10,000,000 square feet of business pad. If these standards were adopted as Happy Valley's public safety element of the City's General Plan, they would be known as the demure or stated (or desired) standard (i.e., the standard the community would like to meet). This fee would be referred to as the General Plan Build -out Need -based Development Impact Fee. The inductive development impact fees (or cost per proportional unit served) for this de jure standard would then be: Table 1-1 Calculation of NFPA Impact Cost ... i�addUse . _._. Strop, CQt units Served v act Fee w_ >> Residential Dwellings $3,000,000 5,000 $600.00 per home Business Square Feet $3,000,000 10,000,000 1 $0.30 per S.F. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 5 845 Chapter One Background and Introduction Service Base - Happy Valley's General Plan indicates that at General Plan build -out there will be 10,000 residential units and about 20,000,000 square feet of commercial/office/industrial space creating a need for four stations at build -out. The station calculation is as follows: Table 1-2 Determination of Required Number of Stations Units -served by ;= Stations Qne. Statton Residential Dwellings 10,000 5,000 2 Stations Business Square Feet 20,000,000 10,000,000 2 Stations Required Stations at General Plan Build -out 4 Stations The infrastructure is "On -target" - The need for four stations appears simple and the Happy Valley Council need only impose the impact fees identified in Table 1-1. Currently, Happy Valley has 6,250 residential units and 7,500,000 square feet of commercial/industrial building pad and is half "built -out" (in terms of fire calls for service). In this example, existing development within Happy Valley is generating half of the ultimate (General Plan build -out) fire calls -for -service. This is demonstrated in Table 1-3 following: Table 1-3 Development of Current Infrastructure is "On -Target" Number; Ufuts served by Stations _ Re. Residential Dwellings 6,250 5,000 1.25 Stations Business Square Feet 7,500,000 10,000,000 0.75 Stations Total Number of Stations Required Currently 2.00 Stations Conversely, Happy Valley has the remaining half of its fire demand (in terms of calls -for -service) Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 6 846 Chapter One Background and Introduction yet to come. Left to build are 3,750 detached dwelling units and 12,500,000 square feet of business floor space, and when constructed would generate the following capital needs identified on Table 1-4 following: Table 1-4 Remaining Development and Station Requirement Residential Dwellings 3,750 5,000 0.75 Stations Business Square Feet 12,500,000 10,000,000 1.25 Stations # of New Stations Required from Land to be Develo ed 2.00 Stations If the earlier calculated impact fees ($600 per residence and $0.30 per square foot of business pad) were adopted and imposed, Happy Valley would collect (by General Plan build -out) enough capital revenues to construct the remaining two stations and proportionality between existing and future residents and businesses would be evident. Table 1-5 following demonstrates this: Table 1-5 Remaining DIF Collection Dumber Impact Amount of Utts , Fee Colleted Residential Dwellings 3,750 $600.00 $2,250,000 Business Square Feet 12,500,000 $0.30 $3,750,000 Amount Collected in Development Impact Fees $6,000,000 Cost of a Single New Station $3,000,000 Stations to be Built with Development Impact Fees 2.00 And everyone in the community of Happy Valley is adequately served by the four stations having been financed generally fairly by the total community. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 7 847 Chanter One Background and Introduction The infrastructure is in Deficient Condition - Consider, however, the implications if the current Happy Valley residents and businesses had shown the earlier limited commitment to contribute only enough financing to construct one station when, based upon their own adopted standards and level of development, they should have two stations? Clearly three more stations would be needed on the path to General Plan "build -out." The possibility of requiring the remaining future home and business owners to finance all three remaining stations would be completely inequitable. But would it be fair and equitable to charge new residents the $600 per home and new businesses the $0.30 per business square foot in order to acquire the remaining two stations required to meet the NFPA standards required of the new development? The simple and direct answer is probably not. With only one station constructed at half build -out, the Happy Valley community has not demonstrated to a proportional commitment to meeting the NFPA standards, and as a result would not have a strong case to assert that others who build later need to contribute toward the construction of multiple (two) fire stations at a higher service rate by including the "missing" second station. The problem is in trying to identify a municipal revenue source imposed only on the existing development. Simply, there is none. Soon as a business pays its impact fees, constructs, that business becomes part of the existing community. The service provided by the single existing station is the community's de facto (or"in fact") standard service level. In short, it is difficult (but possible) to claim that a higher level of service is required of new development when the City is somehow getting by with a lower level of service. With one station, the contributed equity to build the single station would be half of the impact fee proposed in Table 1-1, or $300/residential unit and $0.15/square foot of business space respectively (See Table 1-6, following). Table 1-6 Development Impact Fee at Deficient Condition - _ _ Number. -�f��Tmts___ Exisuig Cor�trihutiori Anourit _�aileeted _ �� Residential Units 3,750 $300.00 $1,125,000 Business S.F. 12,500,000 $0.15 $1,875,000 Amount Contributed by Existing Community $3,000,000 Cost of One New Station $3,000,000 Station(s) built with Communit 's Contribution 1.00 11 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 8 848 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings This Chapter provides an inventory of developed and undeveloped (and under -developed) land within the City. The City, surprisingly, still possesses areas of vacant land zoned for residential and business uses. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS This Report contains an inventory of developed land and land with remaining development opportunities within Huntington Beach boundaries. The undeveloped land inventory columns form the base for distribution of the estimated infrastructure costs required to extend the existing levels of service to the new development. The developed land inventory also forms the base for distributing the cost of the existing infrastructure for comparison and for the de facto identification of the existing levels of service (LOS) provided by those existing infrastructures. Table 2-1 below, summarizes the inventory of all private land uses contained within the current City limits. They are based upon General Plan data, Orange County projections, City records and a staff analysis of only privately held parcels.' Some of the vacant parcels have vested rights and would have the existing impact fees imposed. The acreage and unit data are detailed in Appendix A. Pity. ofHuntiVon: Beach otal - Land Lase Database Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Total - City Limits Private Residences Commercial Lodging Rooms Business Square Feet Table 2-1 Detailed Land Use Inventory Reveloped Net increase Total Acres #'of Units Acres # of Units Ades # of Untts 6,436.0 38,616 1,805.4 36,108 204.6 2,865 33.4 1,070 20.2 809 841.9 12,836,000 930.3 20,261,000 295.00 1,749 111.20 5,307 1.00 9 18.60 818 9.30 535 39.80 2,417,000 187.00 31638,000 6,731.00 40,365 1,916.60 41,415 205.60 2,874 52.00 1,888 29.50 1,344 881.70 15,253,000 1,117.30 23,899,000 10,271.8 ; ----- 661.90 ---- 10,933.70 ---- 8,446.0 77,589 407.2 7,065 8,853.2 84,654 53.6 1,879 27.9 1,353 81.5 3,232 1,772.2 33,097,000 226.8 6,055,000 1,999.0 39,152,000 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 16 r-161.1 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findin s Table 2-2 Summary of Undeveloped and Developed Acreage - Detached Dwelling Units Develo ed- p acres - _ 6,436.0 Percent = of 58.9 % Vacant, Redeveloped Intens[ed Acres (1) 295.0 Percept = of 2.7 % Total _ Ac�rs 6,731.0 Attached Dwelling Units 1,805.4 16.5 % 111.2 1.0 % 1,916.6 Mobile Home Dwellings 204.6 1.9 % 1.0 0.0 % 205.6 Comm. Lodging Units 33.4 0.3 % 18.6 0.2 % 52.0 Resort Lodging Units 20.2 0.2 % 9.3 0.1 % 29.5 Commercial/Office Uses 841.9 7.7 % 39.8 0.3 % 881.7 Industrial/Manu. Uses 930.3 1 8. 5 % 187.0 1 1.7 % 1,117.3 TotalL10,271.8 94.0% 661.9 6.0% 10,933.7 (1) Only 34 of the 295 acres are vacant lots. The remaining 261 acres represents the subdivided acres necessary for the addition of 1,566 detached units (on their own lots) in areas already developed such as a lot split of a larger parcel with an existing detached dwelling unit. See Appendix A for greater detail. General Plan Build -out is defined as that point in time when most if not all of the City's privately owned land is developed at maximum levels allowed by the City's General Plan. Commercial/Industrial Development. In order to assess the costs of impact for commercial or industrial building intensification or building expansions, this Report includes a calculation of impact fees both on a per square foot basis for commercial and industrial development. In order to accomplish this, City Planning staff provided the typical maximum square feet of building allowable by the City's General Plan on a net acre of land. This percentage is sometimes referred to as the maximum Floor Area Ratio (or FAR), as shown following: Commercial/Office Development-15,246 G.S.F. per Acre (about 35% F.A.R.) Industrial Development - 21,390 G.S.F. per Acre (about 50% F.A.R.) Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 19 859 Chapter 2 Demo ra hics and Findin s Table 2-3 City of City of Huntington Beach Average Dwelling Occupancy, by Type (2000 United States Census Data) Mumber. Less Number Existing Ftesiden#gal of Units Vacant OccupEed Toiak ]lumber Average'.. Percentage,.` of Occupants Occupancy {3ceupied Detached Total 37,007 630 36,377 105,981 2.913 98.30% 5,281 1.822 95.87% Mobile Home Total 3,024 125 2,899 Other 122 31 91 154 1.692 0.000/o Attached—Residential.: Duplex to Quadplex 9,681 265 9,416 26,190 2.781 97.26% Five or more 16,488 605 15,883 35 31,6 1.974 96.33% Attached 9,471 329 9,142 20,186 2.208 96.530/a Total - MFR 35,640 1,199 34,441 77,732 2.257 96.64% 190,377 Existing - State Department of Finance 01/01/11 Population Poterttral G P 8t�rld=out Papulatiari: Ar�tJcipated UJccupancy Probable Ott frstprrc Occup ancy;: Undeveloped Detached Dwellings 1,749 98.30% 1,719 Undeveloped Attached Dwellings 5,307 96.64%1 5,129 Undeveloped Mobile Home's 9 95.870/o9 Population to be added development Potential "Build -out" Population, at Historic Vacancy Rates. P061261-i P 13urld --'out Povulatror At fla�.b f3cctepancy f�2te > Anticipated llnrts vpancy Prpbable late E9ccupancy. Undeveloped Detached Dwellings 1,749 100.00% 1,749 Undeveloped Attached dwellings 5,307 100.00% 5,307 Undeveloped Mobile Home's 9 100.00% 9 t�vellrng �ensrty 2.913 2.257 1.822 Dwel/rng Density 2.913 2.257 1.822 Population to be added development Potential Maximum "Build -out" Population. Population at General Plan Build -out @ Low per Dwelling Resident Densities Population at General Plan Build -out @ High per Dwelling Resident Densities Average Population at General Plan Build -out (1) Summary File 3 (SF3), available at http://f`actfinder.census.gov (2) Current population based upon State of California Department of Finance data. �tntrcrpatizi F'opulatron 5,007 11,576 16 16,599 16,599 206,97E 1 206,976 Antrcrpat�tl: Population . 5,095 11,978 16 17,089 17,089 F--2-0-7,4-66T 207,466 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 22 862 Chapter 2 Demographics and Findings SUMMARY OF FINDINGS City staff identified just under $403.4 million in needed and desired capital improvement projects required through the City's General Plan build -out, including both projects related to existing deficiencies and those needed solely to support future growth. The adoption of the recommended maximum impact fees supported by the calculations in this Report (Schedule 2.1) would finance about 42.6% of the needed capital facilities by raising some $172.1 million. Existing fund balances of $3.6 will finance roughly 0.9 % of the capital needs. Other sources, primarily existing agreements or intergovernmental support will finance about $23.0 million or 5.7%. Other capital revenue sources will need to be pursued for the remaining unfunded $204.8 million through build - out (50.8 %). Roughly 95 %(or $194.4 million) of the $204.8 million represents unfunded storm drainage projects that may never come to fruition. Based on these costs and the schedules found at the end of each of the remaining chapters of this Report, costs attributable to future development were derived on a per unit basis for residential land uses and on a per square foot of pad basis for commercial and industrial land uses. Schedule 2.1, found at the end of this Chapter, provides a summary detail of the maximum DIFs for each type of infrastructure and land use category. The fees are summarized in Table 2-4, following: Table 2-4 Summary of Recommended Development Impact Fees (Based Upon the Lower of General Plan Build -out Needs or Equity -based Impact Fees) _:. Recomrnended Development =Land„Use Tm act_Fees Detached Dwelling Units $25,890/Dwelling Unit Attached Dwelling Units $17,994/Dwelling Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $17,235/Dwellin Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $2,854/Lodging Unit Resort Lodging Units $3,956/Lodging Unit Commercial/Office Uses $5.002/S ware Foot Industrial/Manufacturin Uses $4.010/S uare Foot Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 23 863 Schedule 2.1 City of Huntington Beach Summary of Development Impact Fees By Type of Fee (Fees per Residential Dwelling Unit, or Business Square Foot) at Fair Share or Equity -based Development Impact Fees Law Fire Circulation System SterwN.,culnage Public Park Land/Open Develo,pment Enforoernent Suppression Local Streets, Collection Library Space Acquisition Impact Fee Tot7F..t Facilities, et al. Facilities, et. al: Signals & Bridges Systern Facilities &Improvements Per Unit or Square Schedule 32 Schedule 4.2 Schedule 5.2 Schedule 6:2 Schedule7.1 Schedule 8.1 & 8A Calcula(et#�+DStpIDIFs _ Detached Dwelling Units (1) $396 $922 $2,482 $3,061 $1,172 $17,857 $25,890 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units $815 $382 $1,657 $397 $908 $13,835 $17,994 per Unit Mobile. Home Dwelling Units(2 $369 $1,583 $1,299 $2,082 $733 $11,169 $17.235 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $455 $356 $1,105 $479 No Fee $459 $2,854 per Unit Resort Lodging Units $532 $794 $1,915 $356 No Fee $359 $3,956 per Unit commercial/Office Uses $1.041 $0.329 $2.331 $0.347 No Fee $0.954 $5.002 per S-F. Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $0.443 $0.030 $1.621 $1.144 No Fee $0_772 $4.010 per S.F. Anticipated DIF Collection - Detached Dwelling Units (1) $692604 $1,612,578 $4,341.018 $5,353,689 $2,049,828 $31,231,893 $45.281,610 Attached Dwelling Units $4,325,205 $2,027.274 $8.793,699 $2,106.879 $4,818,756 $73,422,345 $95,494,158 Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2 $3,321 $14,247 $11,691 $18,738 $6,597 $100,521 $155,115 Hotel/Motel Lodging Units - $372,190 $291,208 - $903,890 $391.822 $0 $375,462 $2,334,572 Resort Lodging Units $284,620 $424,790 $1,024,525 $190,460 $0 $192,065 $2,116,460 Commercial/Office Uses $2,516,097 $795.193 $5,634,027 $838,699 $0 $2,305,818 $12,089,834 Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $1,611,634 $109,140 $5,897,198 $4,161,872 $0 $2,808,536 $14,588,380 _ - Total S9:8i�5871 , $5,274,430 $26,606,048 $13,082,159 $6,875,181 $110,436,640 $172.080.129 City-wide Impact Fee $9,805,671 $5,274,430 $26,606,048 $13,062,159 $6,875,181 $110,436.640 $172,060,129 Existing Fund Balance $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $3.379,000 $3,579,000 Other Sources $0 $700,000 $260,020 $0 $0 $22,000,000 $22,960,020 Capital Total $10,100,895 $11,941,972 $28,537,800 $207,494.050 $7,841,369 $137483000 $403,399,086 dverade/tShortfatD i$295,224) ($5,957,542) ($1,471,732) ($194;431,891) ($966,188) ($i sei 3s0} ($2oa,7sss37) N O� Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities Vehicles and Equipment Table 3-1 Law Enforcement Calls -for -Service Generated by Land Use (2009) - - bandTse - — _Deep ed p elhngs or_;flcres=erviPr- Cabs _ Far �T`otal Cafe Dwhng or M1_- Detached Dwelling Units 38,616 13,185 0.341/Unit Attached Dwelling Units 36,108 25,350 0.702/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 2,865 910 0.318/Unit Hotel/Motel Units 1,070 420 0.393/Unit Resort Lodging Units 809 371 0.459/Unit Commercial Uses (in KSF) 12,836,000 11,514 0.897/KSF Industrial Uses (in KSF) 20,261,000 7,729 0.381/KSF Beach Area 1,806 The table above representing the 59,479 annual police calls -for -service to privately -held developed parcels within the City's limits (for a recent twelve months reporting periods), identifies the differing demand caused by the differing land uses. As an example, there were approximately 13,185 calls -for -service requiring a response to one of the 38,616 existing detached dwellings in the City (during the twelve month sample). The result indicates that each residential detached dwelling unit will statistically generate just slightly more than one third of a call -for -service per year,' on average. The same analysis was undertaken for the other seven land uses. Obviously there are calls to incidents on publicly owned roads and right-of-way, in parks and other publicly held parcels, these calls represent approximately 3 % of the annual calls -for -service. Calls -for - service to resort lodging facilities, typically larger than hotel/motel facilities (defined as three stories or more) have been separated in order to generate a more relevant calls -for -service rate for each of the two differing types of temporary lodging. Resort facilities have been shown to generate more calls -for -service, most likely due to their convention and banquet facilities. However, any such resorts constructed in the future would also have such amenities. The annual calls -for -service was responded to by one of the City's existing 235 sworn officers establishing an average of about 260.79 calls -for -service per sworn officer annually.' Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 29 869 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Average Demand as Determined by Calls -for -Service. The calls -for -service ratios are on -average, that is to say that not every detached dwelling unit will generate 0.341 annual calls -for -service. Since they are statistically representative of averages of how calls -for -service are generated in City of Huntington Beach, they can be used to project the number of additional law enforcement calls - for -service that can be expected at General Plan build -out. This process is accomplished by multiplying the average calls -for -service rate, per Table 3-1, by the number of anticipated additional residential dwellings or business square feet per Table 2-1. The result is approximately 8,697 additional annual calls -for -service at General Plan build -out. The number of additional officers necessary to meet the anticipated (net) additional 8,697 annual calls -for -service from future development (8,448 from development and 249 from public rights -of -way) is then divided by the average number of calls -for -service capacity that an officer currently responds to (or 260.79 per year per officer). This process indicates that an additional thirty-three sworn police officers will be necessary to accommodate the anticipated new development at the current standards of service provided to the existing community. Or in the contrary, without the doubling of the Police staff, the City would experience a roughly 14.2 % reduction in the standards -of -service at General Plan build -out, as defined by the ability to respond to calls -for -service. Information from Table 3-1 and Table 2-1 (Land -use Database) has been used to determine how many additional officers will be required at build -out. By multiplying the demand rate for detached dwelling units (0.341 calls -for -service per unit) times the 1,749 anticipated detached dwelling units to be constructed through General Plan build -out, the City could expect an additional 597.2 annual calls -for -service. The total 8,697 additional calls -for -service, (8,448 from development and 249 from the public beach area from all land -uses (and rights -of -way) divided by roughly 260.79 calls per officer per year indicates the need for thirty-three additional officers to be able to accommodate the additional calls generated by the new development at General Plan build -out without diminishing the existing standards of coverage to the existing community to do so. Table 3-2 identifies the calls -for -service anticipated for each of the seven major land uses. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 30 870 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Table 3-2 Additional Law Enforcement Calls (rounded) Generated by New Development, by Land Use NOTES: (1) Development of these types of units is not anticipated. One acre of units is included for calculation purposes.. Cumulatively, an additional (rounded) calls -for -service would be expected at General Plan build - out. It is important to note that the additional of the thirty-three officers (8,695 annual calls -for - service _ 260.79 calls/sworn officer) by General Plan build -out would merely maintain the existing levels of service, and would not increase the existing levels of service because of the additional 8,697 annual calls -for -service, or the 8,448 calls -for -service to the privately -held land - uses. No judgement is made, regarded or offered about the existing standards -of -service (LOS) or the current ratio of officers to calls -for -service, or that it is the City's desired level -of -service or that it is optimum, it merely is the existing, or defacto, level -of -service (LOS). The Purpose of the Fee. The purpose of the fee is to collect proportional contributions from new development to pay for additionally required law enforcement facilities, vehicles and equipment. Specifically, additional law enforcement calls -for -service can be expected, and the cost of adding sworn officers necessary to respond to these anticipated calls, and thus maintain the existing Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 31 871 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment levels -of -service afforded the existing residential and business community, can also be determined. The additional costs can be proportionally determined and translated to a fee, or an amount, necessary to offset the added costs of the required additional law enforcement staffing. Those impact costs include housing and equipping the additional required officers. Providing that the impact cost is adopted and imposed as a fee, new development will finance the capital costs of expansion of the City's Police Department. The annual operations cost of the annual salary and benefits for those additional officers, will need to come from the increases in the base amounts of property, sales and transient occupancy general tax increases generated by the new residences and businesses and their occupants. The Use of the Fee. The fees collected will be used to fund the law enforcement facilities and equipment (identified in the Master Facilities Plan) that are necessary to accommodate the anticipated (and planned for) development identified in Table 2-1. The revenues raised for a properly calculated and legally -supported Law Enforcement Development Impact Fee would be limited to capital(ized) costs related to that growth. The fees would be used to expand or increase capacity within the law enforcement facilities, increase the number of response and investigator's vehicles, and specialty equipment. Conversely, the General Plan Build -out Needs -based Law Enforcement Development Impact Fee receipts cannot be used repair the existing building, replace existing vehicles, or re -outfit a new officer (due to normal vacancies of the existing 235 officers). The Relationship Between the Use of the Fee and the Type of Development Pang the Fee. The fees collected from new development will be used to pay the proportional facility expansion costs generated by new development. As the development occurs, the impact (in the form of new or additional demands for service) is generated in differing amounts by differing land -uses and the development impact fees would be collected as the various types of development occurs (at a time in the development review and approval process determined by the City) . The collected fee would be put to use to acquire law enforcement space, vehicles and equipment for the new (and additional) officers necessary to respond to those additional calls generated by that same new development, without reducing the capability of responding to calls for the existing community. The Relationship Between the Need for the Public Facility and the Tvge of Development Project. As noted in this report, residents and businesses will generate calls -for -service at different rates. Thus, there is a need to establish a specific schedule of development impact fees to fund the law enforcement facilities needed to support the development anticipated in Table 2-1. To meet that need, Police Department calls -for -service records were used to verify that differing land uses generate differing amounts of calls -for -service. Anecdotally we can all recognize that a retail store would be more likely to suffer shoplifting incidents, whereas a residence is more likely to experience a domestic disturbance or break-in and thus would have differing demands. The data in this Chapter demonstrates those expected differences using data specific to the City of Huntington Beach. The collected impact fees would be used to acquire additional building space, Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 32 872 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities Vehicles and E ui ment response vehicles and specialty and issued equipment for additional officers necessary to respond to the additional calls -for -service generated by private residential dwelling and business space. It would take the construction of roughly 368 attached dwellings to generate the need for a one full police officer. Cumulatively over time, the calls generated by various new developments within the City will create the need for additional officers and ultimately an additional patrol beat. It is interesting to note that on an acreage basis, an acre of detached dwellings, yielding about six detached units, will generate about 2.0 annual calls -for -service, only 15 % of that generated by an acre of attached dwellings, yielding about 47 units. The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the Portion of the Facility Attributed to the Development Project. Each new development would finance a proportional amount of the expansion of the Police Station, vehicle response fleet and specialty law enforcement equipment and thus a proportional share of the costs. The existing Police Station, while quite large and is generally capable of meeting the needs of the existing staff required to serve the existing community, was not necessarily designed to meet the City's law enforcement needs at General Plan build -out. The two buildings combined 85,750 square feet provides about an average of about 364.89 square feet per existing officer, a reasonable target to maintain for future police officers4. Based upon the future addition of thirty-three officers to maintain the existing levels of staffing, a 12,041 square foot expansion of the existing facility, or some other City -owned facility would be needed, (33 X 364.89 = 12,041) to maintain the same ratio of space per officer that is currently afforded by the existing facility. As a result of potential addition of thirty-three sworn officers, the City will also need to add thirty- three response vehicles at a total cost of $1,751,040 (or 33 vehicles X $54,720/vehicle) to maintain as close to the existing ratio of 0.98 vehicles per sworn officer as possible (231 vehicles divided by 235 officers = 0.98 vehicles per officer). The thirty-three new officers would each require a full set of personal equipment and armament at $9,930 each for a total of $327,690. Additional communications, telemetry and specialty operations equipment at an estimated total $425,000 has been included to maintain a similar ratio of specialty equipment to sworn officer. General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development impact Fee Schedule. Table, 3-3, following, summarizes the resulting General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Fees (see Schedule 3.2 for detailed calculation) for development to contribute financially to the expansion of the City's Law Enforcement capacity in order to allow the City to extend the same level -of - service to the City's newest citizens and businesses without diminishing the existing level -of - services offered to the existing residents and businesses. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 33 873 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities Vehicles and Equipment Table 3-3 General Plan Build -out Needs -based Law Enforcement Impact Fees Allocation of Expan ion Cost Land Usk -_ _ x anston Coss _ Pei Unl, Detached Dwelling Units $692,944 $396/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $4,323,304 $815/Unit Mobile Home Dwellin Units $3,319 $369/Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $372,568 $455/Unit Resort Lodging Units $284,694 $532/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $2,515,742 $1.041/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $1,610,348 $0.443/S.F. DIF Proportionality Test by Comparison with Existing Financial Commitment. The current equity in the City's law enforcement assets includes the 85,750 square feet of law enforcement facilities with a replacement cost of $53,423,178, the 231 law enforcement vehicles costing the City some $12,640,310, the inventory of assigned equipment for 235 officers at a total of $2,155,801, the specialty and communications equipment at $3,027,410. There is no existing Law Enforcement Development Impact Fee thus no existing fund balance. When this combined equity figure of $71,246,699 is distributed to the current community (via Table 3-4, following and detailed in Schedule 3.3), the existing community commitment, on a per unit basis, is just slightly less than the calculated Law Enforcement General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Fees (or cost) per unit, as indicated by the existing $71,246,699 invested in capital for the provision of law enforcement. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 34 874 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities Vehicles and Equipment Table 3-4 Existing Financial Commitment or "Equity -based" Law Enforcement Impact Fees A1Lgcation -�`otal Equity- Detached Dwelling Units $15,793,603 $409/Unit Attached Dwellin Units $30,365,403 $841/Unit Mobile Home Units $1,090,040 $380/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $503,096 $470Unit Resort Lodging Units $444,401 $549/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $13,792,002 $1.074/S.F. Industrial Uses $9,258,164 $0.475/S.F. RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES The General Plan Build -out Needs -based impact fees, identified in Table 3-3, are slightly less than the Financial Commitment or Investment -based fees identified in Table 3-4 indicating that the existing commitment has kept relative pace with law enforcement asset expansion. In order to ensure that proportionality, and its underlying fairness, be maintained the development impact fee schedule identified in Table 3-3, (General Plan Build -out Need -based Development Impact Fees) are the most reasonable for both additional new development and the existing community. The adoption of Table 3-3, and detailed in Schedule 3.2 at the end of the Chapter, would also generate sufficient capital, about 97 % of the full amount identified in the Master Facilities Plan, to construct most of the law enforcement facilities and capital equipment needed to absorb the new demands generated by the City's continued new development while maintaining proportionality with the commitment demonstrated by the existing community. The remaining 3 % would need to come from other sources. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 35 875 Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities Vehicles and Equipment RECAP OF RECOMMENDED LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES • Adopt Schedule 3.2, General Plan Build -out Needs -based development Impact Fees for the seven basic new land -uses. CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. The twelve month period spanning 2009. 2. Stated slightly differently, we could expect that any randomly selected thirty homes would generate about ten calls in a given year. 3. Again, this is not intended to imply that each officers annul work effort is limited to only 260.79 calls -for - service. Patrol officers respond to a far greater number of calls -for -service. Investigators may spend an entire year on only a few cases, while officers involved in management of the Department do not necessarily respond to any. The 260.79 calls -for -service is only an average and represent the composite calls -for -service workload distributed between the entire 235 sworn officers. 4. This is almost the same as the average of 365.0 square foot per officer of six cities (with greater than 85 officers) where RCS has conducted similar analyses. Those six municipalities include Huntington Beach, Anaheim, Ontario, Riverside, Chino and Corona. The average for twenty cities (of all sizes) is 353.6 square feet per sworn officer. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 36 876 ro J Schedule 3.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Identification of Projects and Cost Allocation Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS 1 $10,100,895 LESS: Existing Law Enforcement Impact Fee Fund Balance 1 $0 SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $0 Total - Law Enforcement Capital Project Needs 1 $10,100,895 NOTES: 1. Costs distribution based upon a 10% sampling of Police Department "Calls -for -Service" Statistics_ w J : Amount Allocated Arfrount Allocated to Eliminate to Genera! Plan EaristiRg Def0ehCr85 New,DevelDpment percent_:; Appo!tloned : Percent Apporfoned heed Dollar: Cost Need . Do!!ar host 2.95°l $224,116 2.95°Io $51,656 25d/o $9,667 $12,538 r 2 96% $297,976 r0 00% $0 $297,976 97.05% $7,373,049 97.050/ $1,699,384 97.05% $318,023 97.05% $412,463 97.050/ $9,802,919 0.000k $0 97.05%1 $9,802,919 Forward.to;chedu.le Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 3.2 City of Huntington Beach 2010-11 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment DOTAL 661 9 -- 8,448.17 10C1.00� $9,8t�2, i9 in Total Lair Er�fptcement' pri t O.Oids to Complete Syste Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 3.3 City of Huntington Beach 2010-11 Development Impact Fee Calculation and !Nexus Report Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment OD <o proposed Land (/se Developed Call Genetrafren bate Existing Ci/s for Service Percentage of Existing Service Calls Allocation of�strlButlon Infrastructure "qurty".: of »Equity" pprAcre A�rerage Units or Square Feet7Aere Current Financial Comrnrtment pet Unit or Square foot Acres Units Detached Dwelling Units(1) 6,436.0 38,616 0.341 13,185.0 22.17% $15,793,603 $2,454 6.00 $409 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 1,805.4 36,108 0.702 25,350.0 42.62% $30,365,403 $16,819 20.00 $841 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 204.6 2,865 0.318 910.0 1.53% $1,090,040 $5,328 14.00 $380 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 33.4 1 1,070 0.393 420.0 0.710 $503,096 $15,063 32.04 $470 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 20.2 809 0.459 371.0 0.62% $444,401 $22,000 40.05 $549 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 841.9 12,836,000 0.897 11,514.0 19.36% $13,792,002 $16,382 15,246 $1.074 perS F. Industrial/Manufacturing Use 930.3 20,261,000 0.381 7,729.0 12.990 $9,258,154 $9,952 21,779 $0.457 per S.F. Viand Use Units or ; Acres > Calls for 3$ryrce Ar►hra! Calls>: Per Urtrt Detached Dwelling Units 38,616 13,185 0.341 Attached Dwelling Units 36,108 25,350 0.702 Mobile Home Units 2,865 910 0.318 Hotel/Motel Units 1,070 420 0.393 Resort Units 809 371 0.459 Commercial/Office KSF 12,836 11.514 0.897 Industrial KSF 20,261 7,729 0.381 F. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles, and Equipment While the majority of these requests for service were made by residents of Huntington Beach from their homes, a large percentage of requests were generated from existing commercial/office and industrial uses within the City. A survey of each land use and its existing effect on requests for calls -for -service was conducted to determine existing service ratios and thus he able to project the impact of future development on fire services. This survey was undertaken similarly to the process used to determine law enforcement demand as described in Chapter 3, Law Enforcement. Only requests for fire and medic services to privately held property were counted. Calls -for - service to public property such as City parks and public right-of-way or intersections were not included which, in effect, distributes these calls pro-rata through the calls -for -service from privately held property. This is based upon the argument that all public land serves privately held land in some manner. Table 4-1, following, identifies the number of requests for service received by the Fire Department during the period of July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009, by land use (detached dwelling, attached dwelling, mobile home, resort hotel/motel, commercial/office, and industrial). The number of calls -for -service received by the Fire Department for each of the major land -uses during the year was then divided by either the existing number of dwelling units (for residential uses) or the developed acres (for commercial, office and industrial uses) to determine the number of requests generated per dwelling unit or commercial or an industrial acre. Table 4-1 Average Annual Existing Responses Per Unit Or Acre �weli�ngs,_` Annual =Annual Calls Land TTse Rooms car T Calls -for per Unit service ..- .., or,KSF _ Detached Dwellin Units 38,616 4,762 0.123/Unit Attached Dwelling Units 36,108 1,846 0.051/Unit Mobile Home Units 2,865 607 0.212/Unit Hotel/Motel Units 1,070 51 0.048/Unit Resort Lodging Units 809 86 0.106/Unit Commercial & Office KSF 12,836,000 565 0.044/KSF Industrial KSF 20,261,000 82 0.004/KSF Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 45 885 Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities Vehicles, and Equipment The beach/City right-of-way areas generated 195 calls for service. Of residential land uses, the occupants of an attached dwelling unit are less likely, by less than half as much, to require an emergency fire service response at 0.051 annual responses per unit, than the occupants of a detached dwelling unit at 0.123 annual responses per unit. Commercial/Office development is shown to generate 0.044 responses per 1, 000 square feet of building pad, while industrial development generates a minimal response demand of 0.004 calls per 1, 000 square feet of building pad. The lower demand by industrial uses over commercial/office uses should be expected given the greater density of employees and patrons in a commercial or office establishment when compared to an industrial business of similar building size. However, it should be noted that while there are fewer calls for industrial properties, significant specialty training is required to be prepared for industrial responses, (i.e., confined space and hazardous materials training). Table 4-2 indicates that, given the high density of rooms and accompanying facilities, an acre of resort development, creates the highest demand for fire services, thus the development impact fee for that land use is the highest, on an average acreage basis. Table 4-2 Calls -for -service by Land -use an Acre Basis _. Calls Uts or- Azanuals ._. Land [Te - per CTmt' ISF Calls per 'P_U Acxe .... acre Detached Dwelling Units 0.123 6 0.74 Attached Dwelling Units 0.051 20 1.02 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 0.212 14 2.97 Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 0.048 32 1.53 Resort Lodging Units 0.106 40 4.25 Commercial/Office Uses (per KSF) 0.044 15,246 0.67 Industrial/Manufacturin Uses (KSF) 1 0.004 1 21,779 1 0.09 Based on the existing rate of responses by land use, the increased number of fire suppression/medic service responses generated by future residential, commercial/office and office Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 46 886 Chapter 4 Fire SuppressionlMedic Facilities Vehicles, and Equipment development was extrapolated. This was accomplished by multiplying the average responses per unit or 1,000 square feet (KSF), established in Table 4-1, by the number of anticipated dwelling units, commercial rooms or business KSF. Table 4-3, following, indicates the number of additional calls -for -service that could be anticipated from the development of currently vacant land within the City's planning area. Table 4-3 Additional Annual Fire Suppression/Medic Responses Generated by Future Anticipated Development Lan d Use _ ..._ Fire/Merc Responses Per: UnrtlK_. 4 Potential Unrts : _ors ....... Additional _ A ` ual Frye Res oases. Detached Dwelling Units 0.123/unit 1,749 units 215.68 calls Attached Dwelling Units 0.051/unit 5,307 units 271.32 calls Mobile Home (in parks) 0.212/unit 9 units 1.91 calls Hotel/Motel Units 0.048/unit 818 units 38.99 calls Resort Lodging Units 0.106/unit 535 units 56.87 calls Commercial/Office Uses 0.044/KSF 2,417 KSF 106.39 calls Industrial Uses 0.040/KSF 3,638 KSF 14.72 calls Total :: - 705.88 calls Proposed Capital Expenses. The total cost of the required improvements to the City's investment of fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and specialty equipment was previously estimated to be $11,941,972 with an offset of $700,000 from the proceeds of sale of the to -be vacated Heil Station #8. Roughly 46.4 % has been identified as required to serve the net new calls -for -service resulting from development or up -sizing due to redevelopment. Projects FS-001 through FS-006 are capacity -increasing and have been determined by City staff to be necessary to accommodate the anticipated additional calls -for -service from new development or for a more appropriate aerial unit. When this cost is distributed the various land -uses and the demands created by each, a proportional cost is determined, by development unit. Table 4-4, summarized from Schedule 4.2, indicates the proportional cost by land -use unit. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 47 %8M Chapter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities Vehicles and E ui ment Table 4-4 General Plan Build -out Needs Fire Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Development Impact Fees Detached Dwelling Units $1,693,338 $968/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $2,130,176 $401 /Unit Mobile Home Units (in arks) $14,996 $1,666/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $306,117 $374/Unit Resort Lodging Units $446,495 $835/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $835,285 $0.346/S.F. Industrial Uses $115,569 $0.032/S.F. Existing_Cijy Financial Commitment. The replacement value of the existing fire infrastructure (parcel and station, response fleet and related safety/specialty equipment) at a net $61,234,227 (includes the potential sale of the Heil Station) was referenced earlier in this Chapter. This represents the current investment or financial commitment by the existing community toward fire suppression/medic capability/capacity. When this figure is distributed over the existing development in the same manner as were the future costs, by the land use demands, an average investment, or financial commitment (or equity for that matter) per unit is determined. The results are summarized in Table 4-5 (from Schedule 4.3). As an example, each detached dwelling unit has "invested" over the lifetime of the City, about $922 (as identified in Table 4-5 following) into fire suppression/medic capital, an amount that is about 95 % of the General Plan Build -out Needs - based Development Impact Fee schedule identified in the previous Table 4-4 and detailed in Schedule 4.3. The current community's commitment has established the eight response station capacities and was paid for through years of General Fund receipts. To allow future residents to benefit by use of all of the capital needs without contributing additional assets, could endanger the existing residents and businesses. Table 4-5, following, summarizes the distribution of the $ in replacement costs to the existing community, (Schedule 4.3 indicates this in greater detail). Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 48 M. Cho ter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities Vehicles and Equipment Table 4-5 Existing Fire Suppression/Medic Existing Community Financial Commitment Alloc-on Equity _ - °f --1 = :Total Per-Vcut or, Detached Dwelling Units $35,586,696 $922/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $13,795,263 $382/Unit Mobile Home Units (in arks) $4,536,145 $1,583/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $381,126 $356/Unit Resort Lodging Units $642,683 $792/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $4,222,277 $0.329/S.F. Industrial Uses $612,791 $0.030/S. F. Other (beach area) $1,457,246 NA Of importance is the fact that the Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based costs on Table 4-5 are just slightly higher, at roughly 105%, than the proposed General Plan Build -out - based impact fees as demonstrated in Table 4-4. This indicates that the City is just slightly behind in its cumulative and proportional investment in needed fire suppression/medic facilities, vehicles and equipment. RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES Since the equity position of the existing community is slightly less than the General Plan Build -out Needs -based development impact fees necessary for expansion, the current Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test -based Development Impact Fees, as identified in Table 4-5 and Schedule 4.3, would be the most equitable fee schedule to adopt. ResultingDevelopment Impact Cost Distribution. The collection of the proposed development impact fee, through build -out would allow the City to provide a great deal (44.7 %) of the proposed expansions and most of the equipment, but not all of it. It would fall about $6.0 million short of financing all of the required improvements attributed to new development. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 49 889 Chanter 4 Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities Vehicles, and Equipment OTHER NOTES AND ISSUES 1. The City will need to monitor the approval of conditional uses within industrial zoned development where newly constructed industrial developments. These land uses are initially have the lower industrial use development impact fees imposed when constructed as "spec" buildings but end up being used, with a CUP, for commercial/office uses. These commercial/office uses generate far greater demand than the industrial uses. If left unchecked, the Fire Department, as well as other City services, will be faced with the greater demand from the actual commercial/office uses but will be left only with the collection of the far lower industrial use development impact fee rates. To avoid this under collection, the City should impose an impact fee representing the difference between the commercial/office development impact fee and the previously paid industrial land -use impact fee when a CUP is approved and tenant improvement plans are submitted indicating a commercial or office use. RECAP OF RECOMMENDED FIRE SUPPRESSION/MEDIC FACILITIES, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. • Adopt Schedule 4.3 General Plan Build -out Needs -based for the seven basic land -uses. CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. The response data is generated from Department response incident data used to complete the annual National Fire Incident Report (NFIR's). Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 50 rr511 Schedule 4.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Identification of Projects and Cost Allocation Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities and Vehicles co El Construction Neiaals Gons#ruction N�ects 5c ppodbd bye Generated ay New �7ther AesobrCes ' `DeYe1©prriertt Estimated P rttined Cost Need pblfar Cosf :' - Neenl >ollar;tost SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS $11,941,9723 $9.10 $6,399,997 LESS: Existing Fire Suppression Impact Fee Fund Balance $0 1.t)0 00°J: $0 Sale of Property (Heil Station) ($700,000) 1'b0 009?0 ($700,000) SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS ($700,000) :0 QO°/' ($700,000) Total - Fire Suppression/Medic Capital Project Needs $11,241,972 r,4 70?/ $5,699,997 NOTES: 1. The cost distribution is based upon annual Fire Department "Calls -for -Service" statistics (NFIRs). 50.00% $3,584,735 25.00% $429,011 50.00a/ $633,229 50.00% $370,000 50.00% $262,500 50.000k $262,500 46.41%1 $5,541,975 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 49.300 $5,541,975 F' ward taSchedufe 4 2 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 4.2 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities and Vehicles Detached Dwelling Units (1) 295.00 1,749 0.123 215.68 30.55% $1,693,338 $5,740 5.93 $968 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 111.20 5,307 0.051 271.32 38.440 $2,130,176 $19,156 47.72 $401 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.00 9 0.212 1.91 0.270/b $14,996 $14,996 9.00 $1,666 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 18.60 818 0.048 38.99 5.52% $306,117 $16,458 43.98 $374 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 9.30 535 0.106 56.87 8.06% $446,495 $48,010 57.53 $635 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 39.80 2,417,000 0.044 106.39 15.070/a $835,285 $20,987 60,729 $0.346 per S.F. industrial/Manufacturing Use 187.00 3,638,000 0.004 14.72 2.09% $115,569 $618 19,455 $0.032 per SF. i(77AL . :I 66i 5D 705.88 100 U)°5,541 375 in Total Fire Suppression capital Needs to i lfiishSystHrri;: LA N Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 4.3 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities and Vehicles Developed Gall Existing Percentage Allocation of Dlsfrlbution Average<tJitffs' Current Financial Acres Units Generation Calls for of Existing Infrastructure of "Equity" or Square Commitment per Unit Proposed Land Use - --- Rate Service -------- Service Calls "Equity" per Acre ------- FeeUACr'O :: or Square Foot - Detached Dwelling Units(1) 6,436.00 38,616 0,123 4,762.0 58.12% $35,586,696 $5,529 6.00 ( $922 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units _ 1,805.40 36,108 0.051 1,846.0 22.530/a $13,795,263 $7,641 20.00 $382 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 204.60 2,865 0.212 607.0 7.410/a $4,536,145 $22,171 14.00 $1,583 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 33.40 1,070 0.048 51.0 0.62% $381,126 $11,411 32.04 $356 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 20.20 809 0.106 86.0 1,05% $642,683 $31,816 40.05 $794 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 841.90 12,836,000 0.044 _ _ 565.0 6.90% $_4,222,277 $5,015 15,246 $0.329 per S.F. _ Industrial/Manufacturing Use 930.30 20,261,000 0.004 82.0 1.000/0 $612,791 $659 21,779 $0.030 per S.F. Beach Area ._..L_ - 195.0 2.38°/o $1,457,246 TOTt1l ' 0; 71 80 8;194.0 100.00% $61,234,227 in Total.Equity in Current Fire Suppression Assets w $52,999,718 in Existing Fire Suppression Facilities. ($3,250,473) Less Hell Station 48 (to be relocated). $700,000 Proceeds of Sale of Heil Station #8 $9,237,000 in Existing Fire Suppression Vehicles. $537,780 in Existing Computer/Electronic Fire Equipment $1,010,202 in Existing Fire-fighter Assigned Equipment. $0 in Existing Fire Suppre5sio>t Utipact Fee Fund Balance...;. Ni Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Chapter S Circulation (Streets, Signals, and Bridges) System [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Table 5-1 Comparison of Circulation System Attributes Infrastructure .: ;..xistuig ; T Future - Total at Factor .,.__.. Coiu _ommuty Budd -out..:_ Number of Trip -miles 3,135,213 370,924 3,506,137 .._ Perenta e of Total, _ , .. _ . ..-0:6.` 89 4% - ....._ - _..00 O Cost of Total System $533,539,375 $26,608,410 $560,147,785 % ,. vow The Relationship Between the Need for the Facilit and the Type of Development Proiect. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the proposed circulation projects and the types of developments on which the fees would be imposed. New residents and new business owners will utilize the community's existing circulation system which will then require a number of street, signal and bridge improvements to maintain the existing level -of -service (LOS) enjoyed by the existing community. Schedule 5.1 identifies the additional traffic to be generated by new development, by type of development. The technical volume, Trip Generation (Manual) 7th Edition, produced by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, has been used to identify part of the nexus, or the relationship between the type of development and the projected number of trips that development will generate. The nexus will be based upon the combined factors of trip frequency and trip distance. New Trin Adiustment for Pass-bv or Diverted Trivs (trip fequencv factors). Schedule 5.2 contains a sub -schedule that identifies adjustments to new total trip -ends. As an example, an acre of general commercial use would be expected, on average, to generate about 381 daily trip -ends. However, approximately 15 % of those trip -ends, or about 57 trip -ends per day, are pass -by trip - ends, in that, the trip -end is not truly an end but is actually a one in a series of stops, i.e. at various commercial establishments, with a different location such as a residence as the final trip - end or destination of the series of trip -ends. In order to be considered a pass -by trip, the location of the stop must be contiguous to the generator? route, i.e. the route that would have been used even if the temporary stop had not been made 4. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) indicates that: Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 59 899 Chapter 5 Circulation Streets Signals, and Bridges) System Thus when forecasted trips based upon the trip generation rates are distributed to the adjacent streets, some reduction is made to account for those trips already there that will be attracted to the proposed development-5 Pass -by trip -ends are fully adjusted (reduced at 100%) from the average trip -ends (per day) generated by the eleven land uses identified in Schedules 5.2 and 5.3. A diverted trip is similar to a pass -by trip -end in that it is an extra stop between, as an example, a motorist's work site and his or her residence. A diverted trip differs slightly in that it requires a minor deviation from the normal generator route and the temporary stop. In short, a diverted trip -end creates a separate side trip using additional (and different) lane miles from that of the normal route from the motorist's place of employment and his or her home 6. These trip -ends increase the traffic volume from the generator route only for brief distances. The ITE adds that diverted trips: are produced from traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the generator (route) and require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway with access to the site. These roadways could include streets or freeways adjacent to the generator but without access to the generator.' These diverted trip -ends will be adjusted (reduced at an assumed 50 %) from the fall trip -end count for each of the land uses identified in the Chapter 2. Again, the trip -end adjustment schedule at the bottom of Schedule 5.2 indicates the total daily trip - ends reduced by the number of pass -by trips (at 100%) and diverted trips (at 50%). The trip pass - by and diversion percentages were generated by a study conducted by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in conjunction with various U.S. and California agencies'. Average Trip Distances by Land Use (trip distance factors). Additionally, the same SANDAG data schedule referenced above provides information for a trip distance factor component to the nexus. Based upon that data, a trip to an industrial work -site has the greatest distance at 9.0 miles. A trip to an office average 8.8 miles, a residential trip averages 7.9 miles, a trip from a hotel or motel (once in residence) averages 7.6 miles, and an average trip to a commercial site is the shortest at 4.3 miles. This indicates that drivers are generally willing travel further distances to work and for treatment at medical offices than they are to shop. Both frequency (trip -ends) and distances (average miles per trip) have been combined into the nexus by combining frequency and distance, the two major factors of circulation master planing. When the trip frequency and trip distance factors are combined, a 200-unit attached dwelling residential specific plan would generate about 4,620 daily trip -miles (200 unit's X 23.1 daily trip - Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 60 110111 Chapter S Circulation (Streets Signals and Bridges) System miles per unit) and a ten -acre commercial -retail development would generate 4,955 daily trip -miles (10 acres X 32.6 trip-miles/K.S.F. X 15,246/1,000 S.F.). Each would pay their proportionate share of the total 370,924 newly created trip -miles expected at General Plan build -out. In the case of the detached dwelling development, the 4,620 daily trip -miles generated by the new 200 attached dwellings represents about 1.25 % of the 370,924 total new trip -miles anticipated at build - out, thus they would be required to contribute financially to the DIF fund or construct projects on the DIF list to an amount equal to 1.49% of the total development -related project costs. The 4,955 daily trip -miles generated by the ten acres of commercial development represent 1.34% of the total 370,924 new trip -miles anticipated at build -out. As a result they would be required to contribute financially to the DIF fund or construct projects on the DIF list to an amount equal to 1.34% of the total development -related project costs. The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the portion of the Facilit Attributed to the Development Project. Again, the calculation of the Circulation System Development Impact Fee is based upon the recognition that differing types of developments generate differing numbers of trip -ends. The fee is based upon the projected number of trip -miles generated by the proposed private development project. Circulation System Development Impact fee receipts will be accumulated until they reach the amount necessary to construct a meaningful project to alleviate or mitigate the demands of those new developments. Table 5-2 (summarized from Schedule 5.2) following, identifies the General Plan Build -out based Circulation System Impact Fee Schedule based upon the net $26,608,410 in identified capacity -increasing projects. Table 5-2 General Plan Build -out Based Circulation System Impact Fees Allocation Total`Cost r� ;of Cosis.... Land tTse. _ Detached Dwelling Units $4,341,072 $2,482/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $8,794,196 $1,657/Unit Mobile Home Units (in arks) $11,693 $1,299/Unit Hotel/Motel Units $903,562 $1,105/Unit Resort Lodging Units $1,024,741 $1,915/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $5,635,037 $2.3031/So.F. Industrial/Manufacturin Uses $5,898,019 1 $1.621/S.F. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 61 M Chapter 5 Circulation Streets Signals, and Brid es stem Again, adoption of this set of proposed fees would generate the total revenue necessary to construct a significant portion (about 93 %) of the needed street, traffic signal and bridge construction projects. The shortfall is largely due to removing new "passthrough" trips from new development outside of the City limits from the calculation. These figures, however, need to be compared to the existing community financial commitment demonstrated by the existing circulation assets to identify the level of fairness in adopting this schedule of development impact fees. Proportionality Test. Table 5-3, following (and summarized from Schedule 5.3) identifies the assets of the existing system (at current construction and acquisition costs). The $533,539,375 consists of the existing $431.6 million in circulation plan arterial/collector streets, $96.8 million in traffic signals and intersection improvements and $5.0 million in major bridges inventory. There is also a $200,000 balance in the Circulation System Development Impact Fee fund balance. When the combined $533.6 million is distributed over the existing community, using the identical nexus factor used for distribution future costs, the existing community has contributed the following, on average, by land use: Table 5-3 Existing Circulation System Community Commitment Comparison Development Impact Fees fSHER AlIocatioti of Coss Tota2-1 l; Cost Detached Dwelling Units $227,375,119 $5,888/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $141,943,317 $3,931/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $8,824,837 $3,080/Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $2,804,166 $2,621/Unit Resort Lodging Units $3,675,809 $4,544/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $70,992,504 $5.531/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturin Uses $77,923,618 $3.846/S.F. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 62 902 Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets Signals, and Bridges) System Of importance is that the existing community has contributed, on average, far more, (at nearly 237 %) than would be required of future development to meet the General Plan build -out needs for all users. This indicates that there is no proportionality issue as the future community is being asked to contribute at a far lesser amount (at about 42 %) than has been contributed by the existing community. Alternative Cost Methodology. A more precise calculation of costs for specific types of land uses (i.e., banks, hospitals, convalescent homes, etc.) can be determined by multiplying the average cost per trip of $71.74 by the applicable daily trip -mile rate. An example of this calculation can be found in Schedule 5.3 at the end of the Chapter and applied to Table 5-4, on the following page. These tables list trip -mile rates and costs for various residential, resort, industrial and commercial developments. A fee system based on a lengthy schedule of trip -mile rates theoretically provides greater accuracy and therefore greater equity in determining specific uses demand on the City's circulation system, but at the same time may increase the City's administrative costs to administer the fee. A more extensive listing of traffic generators by land use is available in Trip Generation as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, New York, NY and SANDAG. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 63 903 Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets. Signals, and Bridges) System Table 5-4 Detail of Circulation System Financial Commitment -based Impact Fees for Specific Business Uses Adjusted Average Trip -end Additional 11 Cost per Cost per 1,000 Square LAND USE f Trip -ends Distance to Trip Trip -miles ( Trip -mile Feet or Dwelling Unit ZESWEN IAL LAND USES (per Unit): Detached Dwelling 8.76 7.9 0.5 34.60 $71.74 $2,482.20 /Unit Apartment 6.15 7.9 0.5 24.3 $71.74 $1,743.28 /Unit Condominium/Townhome 5.36 7.9 0.5 21.2 $71.74 $1,520.89 /Unit Mobile Home Dwelling 4.57 7.9 0.5 18.1 $71.74 $1,298.49 1Unit RESORT/TOURIST 6*.Vn1t or Entry Door} Hotel 6.291 7.61 0.SL 23.91$71.74 1 $1, 714.59 /Room All Suites Hotel 3.771 7.6 0.5 14.31 $71.74 $1,025.88 /Room Motel 4.34 7.61 0.51 16.5 $7L74 1 $1,183.71 /Room rlvDctsr� .fir �,ay0'sP1: - -_ General Light Industrial 6.17 9.0 0.51 27.8 $71.74 $1,994.37 /KSF Heavy Industrial 5.97 9.0 0.5 26.9 $71.74 $1,929.81 /KSF Manufacturing 2.73 9.0 0.5 12.3 $71.74 $882.40 /KSF Warehousing 4.39 9.0 0.51 19.8 $71.74 $1,420.45 /KSF COMMERCIALI (per 1, 00 SF): Office Park 7.42 8.8 0.5 32.6 $71.74 $2,338.72 /KSF Research Park 5.01 8.8 0.5 22.0 $71.74 $1,578.28 /KSF Business Park 9.34 8.8 0.5 41.1 $71.74 $2,948.51 /KSF Bldg. Materials/Lumber Store 29.35 4.3 0.5 63.1 $71.74 $4,526,79 /KSF Garden Center 23.45 4.3 0.5 50.4 $71.74 $3, 615.70 /KSF Movie Theater 2.47 4.3 0.5 5.3 $71.74 $380.22 /KSF Church 5.92 4.3 0.5 12.7 .$71.74 $911.10 /KSF Medical -Dental Office 22.21 8.8 QS 97.7 $71.74 $7,009.00 /KSF General Office Building 7.16 8.8 0.5 31.5 $71.74 $2,259.81 /KSF Shopping Center 30.20 4.31 0.5 64.9 $71.74 $4, 655.92 /KSF !Hospital 11.42 4.31 0.5 24.6 $71.74 $1, 764.80 /KSF Discount Center 62.93 4.3 0.5 135.3 $71.74 $9, 706.42 /KSF High -Turnover Restaurant 8.90 4.3 0.5 19.1 $71.74 $1,37023 /KSF Convenience Market 43.571 4.3 0.5 93.71 $71.74 1 $6,722.04 /KSF Walk-in Bank 13.97 4.31 �0.5 - 30.0 1 $71.74 1 $2,152.20 /KSF Other. {nett avat?able "per KSF') Cemetary (per acre) 3.07 4.3 0.5 6.6 $71.74 $473.48 /Acre Service Station/Market (avg) 107.69 4.3 0.5 231.5 $71.74 $16, 607.81 /FP/Day (4) Service Station and Car Wash 99.35 4.3 0.5 213.E $71.74 $15,323.66 /FP/Day (4) NOTES: 1. AD = Average Daily Trips 2. KSF = Thousand Square Feet of Gross Floor Area 3. Adjusted for Pass -by and Diverted Trips. 4. FPIDay = per 'Fueling Position' per day. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 64 Chapter 5 Circulation (Streets, Signals, and Bridges) System RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES The contribution of the existing community as evidenced in Table 5-3, Community Financial Commitment -based Proportionality Test Fees is far greater than what is to asked of future development (Table 5-2) the General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Fee schedule is adequate and reasonable for adoption. It would be more than adequate for the usual and normal application to the seven broad land -uses. as the fairest schedule of impact fees. However, it is further recommended that there should also be the option for the engineering staff to apply the per trip -mile fee from Schedule 5.2 multiplied by the specific use Table 5-4 or the more extensive listing of traffic generators by land use (available in Trip Generation as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, New York, N.Y.) multiplied by the SANDAG land - use trip distances. RECAP OF RECOMMENDED (LOCAL) CIRCULATION SYSTEM, VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. • Adopt Schedule 5.2. for the seven basic new land -uses including the per Daily Trip -mile rate with standard ITE trip -end rates for the application to unusual or highly specific development proposals. • Adopt Table 5-4 for application on specific business uses as necessary by engineering staff, as well as the table at the bottom of Schedule 5.2 to allow City staff to calculate specific Circulation System DIFs, based upon ITE data not necessarily highlighted on Table 5-4. [This space left vacant to place the Chapter Endnotes on a single page] . Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 65 905 Chapter 5 Circulation Streets Signals, and Bridges) S stem CHAPTER ENDNOTES 2.For complete definitions and standards, see the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Circulation Element as part of the Infrastructure and Community Services Chapter page III-CE-1. Further description of the components of the Element are on page III-CE-2 and III-CE-3. 3.The normal route between a daily work -site and the residence of the motorist. 4.As an example, a motorist travels the same route from work to home daily. On some number of occasions, the motorist stops at a market along the route to pick up some groceries. These stops at the market would be considered pass -by trips in that they do not generate an additional trip along that route. 5.Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers, 525 School Street, SW., Ste. 410, Washington D.C. 20024- 2729, Chapter III, Definition of Terms, Pass -by Trips, page I-7. 6.An example of a diverted trip would be a single trip where, along the way from work, a motorists evening drive home deviates from the normal route taken home to stop at perhaps a preferred grocery store, drop mail off at a post office and pick up a child from piano lesson before continuing home. Each of these three stops would be considered diverted trips. 7.Trip Generation, Institute of Traffic Engineers, 525 School Street, SW., Ste. 410, Washington D.C. 20024- 2729, Chapter III, Definitions of Terms, Diverted Linked Trips, I-5. 8.Trafjic Generators, San Diego Association of Governments, 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101, Brief Guide to Traffic Generation Rates compiled in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of Transportation, the California Department of Transportation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. July 1995. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 66 906 I Schedule 5.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Identification of Projects and Cost Allocation Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Constructrvn Needs i^,pnstrucbaR IIte6K'IS 5upportedd by That Increase':: 011ie: Resources Infrastructureapac�ty P@fGBRt AJ7fJbFflOnBd ::. PerCeRt ;: Ap�tQItIOReCI ` Need Dollar Cast ; Need bollar?Cost SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS $28,537,800 6 �$�.' $1,929,390 -_ 2. A..1 $26,608,410 LESS: Local Circulation Impact Fee Fund Balance ($200,000) Support from Other Agencies ($260,020) SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS 1 ($460,020) Total - Local Circulation -related Capital Project Needs J $28,077,780 '41. There are no notes. 100.Q0°/b ($200,000) 100 00?,.` ($260,020) 100 AO°!' ($460,020) 5;39% $1,469,370 0 C>a°I $0 a.oio $0 0 00�l0 $0 54 77% $26,608,410 Forward td Schedule 5.2 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 I Schedule 5.2 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Detached Dwelling Units 295 1,749 34.60 60,515 16.31% $4,341,072 $14,715 5.93 $2,482 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 111 5,307 23.10 122,592 33.05% $8,794,196 $79,084 47.72 $1,657 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling U 1 9 18.10 163 0.04% $11,693 $11,693 9.00 $1,299 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Unit 19 818 15.40 12,597 3.40% $903,652 $48,583 43.98 $1,105 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Unit 9 535 26.70 14,285 3.85% $1,024,741 $110,187 57.53 $1,915 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 40 2,417,000 32.50 78,553 21.18% $5,635,037 $141,584 60,729 $2.331 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing 187 3,638,000 22.60 82,219 22.17% $5,898,019 $31,540 19,455 $1.621 per S.F. TOTi4t_ 662;:i 370,924 ' 100 $2fi�08 4i�' +n Capita4 �rojeCt deeds #o �jn�sh Circulat�onSystem; ALTERNA77VEFEEMETHODLOGY 1 370,924 1 $26,608,410 $71.74 per Daily Trip -mile Trip -ends Adjustment Calculation Land Use Daily Total Trips Percent of Diverted Trips Diverted Trip % Adjustment Diverted Trip Percent Percent of Pass -by Trips (1) Combined Diverted and Pass -by Remaining Trip % as Adjustment % Adjusted Trip Rate, Adjustmeni % X Total Trips Average Trip Length Trip -ends X a5 X Length Detached Dwellings 9.57 11.0 0.50 5.5 3.0 8.5 91.50% 8.76 7.9 34.6 Attached Dwellings 6.39 11.0 0.50 5.5 3.0 8.5 91.500 5.85 7.9 23.1 Mobile Home Units 4.99 11.0 0.50 5.5 3.0 8.5 91.50% 4.57 7.9 18.1 Hotel/Motel Lodging 5.27 38.0 0.50 19.0 4.0 23.0 77.00% 4.06 7.6 15.4 Resort Lodging 1 9.13 38.0 0.50 19.0 4.0 23.0 77.00% 7.03 7.6 26.7 Commercial Uses (KSF) Industrial Uses (KSF) 23.25 5.68 40.0 19.0 0.50 0.50 20.0 9.5 15.0 2.0 35.0 11.5 65.000 88.500 15.11 5.03 4.3 9.0 32.5 22.6 (1) Pass -by trips adjusted at 100%. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 5.3 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Plgpt7s d t artd Use L ei elpped<; Daily Trip -end Generation Rate Existing Daily Trip -miles Percentage of Existing Trip -miles Allocation of Infrastructure W'FgWitY" Distribution of "Equity" per Acre A veragdVIV.iFifs or Square Feet/Acre Current'Einancial Commitment per Unit' or Squaro Foot. Acres UrtttS Detached Dwelling Units 6,436 38,616 34.60 1,336,114 834,095 51,857 42.62% $227,375,119 $35,329 6-00 $5,888 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 1,805 36,108 23.10 26.60% $141,943,317 $78,622 20.00 $3,931 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling U 205 2,865 18.10 1.65% $8,824,837 $43,132 14.00 $3,080 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Unit 33 1,070 16,478 0.530/c, $2,804,166 $83,957 32.04 $2,621 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 20 809 _15.40 _ 26.70 21,600 0.690/b $3,675,809 $181,971 40.05 $4,544 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 842 12,836,000 _ 32.50 417,170 13.31% $70,992,504 $84,324 15,246 $5.531 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing 930 20,261,000 _ 22.60 457,899 14.61% 3,135,213 100.0001b $77,923,618 $83,762 L 21,779 $3.846 per S.F. [� TOTAL 10,272 -- - $533,539,375 in Total Equity in Current Circulation System Assets $431,589,375 in General Plan Circulation Major Streets $0 in General Plan Major Streets R.O.W. $S dt7p,900 in General Plan Circulation Bridges. $6250Q.000 in General Plan Circulation Intersections $34,26,%0 m G erat Plan C�rcui""atlon,Signals. $200,t10f!: in Citculation,Impact Fee Fund Balance. ALTERNATIVE FEEMETHODLOGY 3,135,213 �; $533,539,375 $170.18 per Daily Trip -mile Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System The Relationship Between the Need for The Public Facilities and the Type of Development Proms. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of developments on which the fees are imposed. New residents and businesses utilize and impact the community's existing storm drainage system which requires various storm drainage improvements. Upon the identification of the costs of storm drainage facilities, generated by future development, costs must be further distributed for each of the land uses (i.e., commercial and residential uses) based on their estimated storm runoff. Detached and attached residential dwelling development provides the most landscape percentage per parcel and thus the greatest percolation and conversely the least runoff of storm -water. As such, these land uses should not bear the same cost as Commercial/Office or Industrial use developments, both of which generally will have lesser landscape area (or stated another way, have a higher percentage of impervious area) and therefore generate a higher amount of storm water runoff. Schedule 6.1 contains the list of storm water projects identified 4 as necessary to control the storm water runoff resulting from the creation of an impervious surface by future development and also continue to protect the existing developed community. The list consists of hundreds of small projects in six storm drainage zones estimated to cost $207,494,050. For this Report, costs were distributed between land uses on established runoff coefficients. Table 6-1 is the listing of these runoff coefficients employed in this Reports Table 6-1 Storm Drainage Runoff Coefficients (@ a 2"/hour rainfall) :Proposed Land Use Goeicent Af T unoff R.,_.: Detached Dwelling Units 0.775 Attached Dwelling Units 0.810 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 0.800 Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 0.900 Resort Lodging Units 0.875 Commercial/Office Uses 0.900 Industrial/Manufacturing Uses 1 0.950 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 73 913 Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System Since this development impact fee category is an acre -based calculation, (as opposed to the number of units built on an acre), it is determined by applying a drainage factor to the type of land use zone. Differences result between what the City's development rules allows (for the General Plan Build -out Need -based Impact Fee) and what has actually been approved in the past (for the Community Financial Commitment or Proportionality Test) can significantly skew the resulting figures. As, an example, the City anticipates future approval of 5,307 attached dwelling units at roughly 48 units per acre density. However, the 36,108 existing attached dwelling units generate an average density of closer to 20 to 25 units per acre. Assuming a storm drainage impact fee of $5,000 per acre, each existing unit would have an equity share of about $200, ($5,000 per acre =25 units per acre = $200/unit) while the future units would be assessed about $100, ($5,000 per acre _ 48 units per acre = $104/unit) . Schedule 6.1 identifies the six storm drainage zones and the projects necessary to provide flood protection and insure the ability to traverse the City during a heavy storm. The project costs total $207,494,050 without any mitigation by Development Impact Fee fund balance. Table 6-2, following, indicates that the 8,303.18 acres of acre -runoff factor created by the currently developed community represents about 92.7 %of the total acre -runoff factor that can be expected at General Plan build -out. Table 6-2 Comparison of Storm Drainage System Attributes Infrastruure Existng - ;Future _ 'Dotal of _ FactoiCoiriinuzu _- Commuu -3uild out Total Runoff Acre Factor 8,303.18 557.85 8,861.03 ercenta a oaf Total; ._..:- , ....._ System Cost Contribution $203,631,313 $207,494,050 $411,175,363 49SO% At the same time the currently developed community's investment in the existing storm drainage system, at $203,631,313 is a lesser proportion at about 49.5 % of the cost of the total system at projected General Plan build -out. Conversely that means that the current vacant and underdeveloped parcels will generate the remaining 6.3 % of the demand expected at General Plan build -out but would, if allocated all of the remaining storm drainage projects would need to Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 74 914 Chanter 6 Storm Drainage Collection Sys finance the remaining 50.5 % of the total General Plan cost of the system at a guaranteed preventive (and assuredly illegal) development impact fee of about $370,000 per acre. This clearly indicates that the City's storm drainage collection system has not been constructed proportionally and ratably with the amount of storm runoff generated by the development in the City to date. Stated slightly differently, with 92.7 % of the City's acreage developed, the storm drainage system should also be close to 92.7 %developed. However, such is not the case. Such a statement can be said of virtually all of Southern California's cities. The most likely reason is that the storm drainage system, without an exclusive revenue source, must compete with other far more needed (or desired) capital projects within the City's limited General Fund. As an example, a $1.0 million dollar signal modification that eliminates significant traffic delays daily, would more likely be funded as compared to a $1.0 million storm drainage project that benefits the community during a few hours of the few rainiest days of the year. A fair cost allocation would be to recognize that future additional drainage represents approximately 6.3 % of the total at General Plan build -out thus should be allocated roughly 6.3 % of the total cost of the remaining projects. Table 6-3, following, indicates the impact fee amounts that would need to be imposed to pay for the cost of completing the portion of the system's collection pipes and channels identified by staff to be financed with impact fees. It would be reasonable to expect future development to finance its proportional share of the identified storm drainage needs without violating the proportionality rule as has been done with other development impact fees in this report. Table 6-3 General Plan Build -out Needs Storm Drainage Facilities Impact Fees o R --Ailocatton of Project Cosh Distribrion Total Cost Per IInit or SF Detached Dwelling Units $5,354,096 $18,149 $3,061/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $2,109,274 $18,968 $397/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $18,735 $18,735 $2,082/Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $392,020 $18,149 $479/Unit Resort Lodging Units $190,624 $20,497 $356/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $838,839 $21,076 $0.347/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing-Uses $4,160,238 $22,247 $1.144/S.F. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 75 915 Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System The Relationship Between the Use of the Fee and the Type of Development Paving the Fee. There is a reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the types of projects on which the fees are imposed. The Storm Drainage Collection System Development Impact Fees that are imposed and collected will be used to mitigate the storm water runoff generated by the various types of development. If the development is a commercial/office or industrial/manufacturing property generating a significant amount of runoff, the fee collected will be proportionally higher and will be enough to construct the required additions to the storm drainage system downstream from this development. From time to time the City may require an applicant of a private project to construct an improvement (or portion thereof) that is on the list of required improvements at the end of this Chapter. This is often done to expedite the project for the applicant/developer. The developer should receive a credit for any money expended on this required improvement against their calculated storm drainage collection system impact fee. An ordinance clearly addressing the issue of credits should be prepared and added to the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code should one not fully exist at this time. The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the Portion of the Facility Attributed to the Development Project. Each new development, or demand increasing redevelopment, would finance a proportional amount of the expansion of the City's storm drainage collection system. Similar to the previous findings, the relationship is based upon the projected amount of storm water to be collected, contained and safely transported to flood control channels or rivers as a proportion of the entire amount of storm water to be so conveyed. The downstream collection lines (lines further down from the proposed project but prior the outfall into a river or flood control channel) need to be sized to handle all of the storm -water collected upstream. Storm - water that is collected in one location accumulates with feeder lines along the way and thus the downstream system must be built increasingly larger (at increasing higher material and construction costs) the further it gets away from its source. Table 6-4 distributes the total existing community financial commitment (or equity value) of the existing system, at $203,631,313, consisting of the actual storm drainage pipe, channels and detention basins. Please note that the resulting development impact cost, by land use, is in terms of units such as residential dwellings or commercial/office and industrial/manufacturing square feet of building pad (including multiple floors). [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page] . Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 76 916 Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System Table 6-4 Distribution of Current Equity -based Commitment in Storm Drainage System Collection (or Proportionality Verification) _ ,_ _ Allocation System Total Cost = )✓arid Use - _ of Equity _ Equity per Per Urltt axF Acre ._. ; .. - Detached Dwelling Units $122,325,402 $19,006 $3,168/Unit Attached Dwelling Units $35,863,547 $19,865 $993/Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units $4,013,573 $19,617 $1,401/Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units $737,145 $22,070 $689/Unit Resort Lodging Units $433,735 $21,472 $536/Unit Commercial/Office Uses $18,583,394 $22,073 $1.448/S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Uses $21,674,517 $23,298 $1.070/S.F. Of note is the fact that Table 6-4 summarizing Schedule 6.3, the investment "investment" (albeit General Plan proportionally deficient) of the current community is slightly greater, (at about 8 %) of the previously exhibited General Plan Build -out Needs -based fees identified in Table 6-3 summarizing Schedule 6.2. Based upon these proportional facts, the adoption of the General Plan Build -out Needs -based fees identified in Schedule 6.2 and summarized in Table 6-3, would be reasonable and equitable. RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES The adoption of Schedule 6.2 at the end of this chapter, as summarized in Table 6-3 and based upon as the Storm Drainage Collection System Development Impact Fees would generate approximately $13.0 million in capital revenues with which to construct a portion of the remaining $207.4 million in the storm drainage infrastructure required to complete the system. The City should adopt both the per unit fees, i.e., the dwelling unit fees and the square foot business construction square foot fees and the per acre figures under the column heading titled Cost Distribution per Acre on Schedule 6.2. The former is for application to projects that include a building creating new demand for all infrastructure and the latter for projects merely creating additional runoff (e.g. a parking structure). Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 77 917 Chapter 6 Storm Drainage Collection System RECAP OF RECOMMENDED STORM DRAINAGE COLLECTION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. • Adopt Schedule 6.2. for the seven basic new land -uses, and; • Adopt the Schedule 6.2, "Cost per Acre" column for construction of parking lots and other private construction causing additional runoff but few other impacts. CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. Storm drainage pipe below the size of 21" is almost exclusively used for "local" or tract storm water collection and is thus not included in the equity calculation. In Huntington Beach this amounts to an additional 80,100 linear foot of reinforced concrete pipe that is 18" to 21" and considered to be "local" in nature and thus not included in this calculation. 2. Roughly assumes inlet boxes constructed at 425 linear foot intervals, combination boxes at 750 foot intervals and junction boxes at 300 linear foot intervals. 3. Projects of major importance generally involving the control of large quantities of flood water (over 500 C.F.S.) through numerous cities and unincorporated areas. 4. The projects individual scope and cost estimates have been provided by the City's contractual engineering firm Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Engineers and Scientists, Irvine, CA 92612-1311. 5. San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual, Williamson and Schmidt, Civil Engineers, Irvine, California, August, 1986, Runoff Index Number 56. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 78 918 T Schedule 6.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Identification of Projects and Cost Allocation Storm Drainage Collection System SD-001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region #1) $23,728,000 SD-002 Coastal and Bolsa Chica Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) $21,527,000 SD-003 Slater Channel Region (SD Region #3) $34,236,000 SD-004 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region #4) $28,749,000 SD-005 Bolsa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region #5) $98,549,000 SD-006 Public Works Maintenance Building $705,050 SUB -TOTAL ESTIMATED NEW PROJECT COSTS $207,494,050 LESS: Existing Storm Drainage impact Fee Fund Balance $0 Other Revenue Sources $0 SUB -TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $0 — Total - Storm Drainage Collection System Capital Project Needs $207,494,050 NOTES: There are no notes. v m otietrricbon Needs GorrstruetJo Ndei7s Suppprtod�y Thatlricrease ; ahet Restiutces f rlrastrucrure iCapac� Percent ' �PpertlorrQd <:. Need C�olfar 93 70910 $194,430,225 0.000/ $0 0 oao $o 0 OOOZ' $0 6.300/ $1,493,915 6.30% $1,355,340 6.30% $2,155,499 6.30% $1,810,037 6.30% $6,204,645 6.300/ $44,390 6.300/- $13,063,825 0.00% _ $0 0.00% $0 6.30%1 $13,063,825 Fonivard 3o iSGhedufe 6.2 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 6.2 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report General Plan Build -out Needs -based Development Impact Costs (Fees) Storm Drainage Collection System Proposed Land Use Undeveloped Acres Units Coefficient Storm Percentage Allocation of Cost Average Units Development of Drainage Drainage of Additional Expansion Distribution or Square Impact Fee per Unit Factor Run-off Service Calls Costs Per Acre 1 eeUAcre or Square Foot Detached Dwelling Units(1) 295.00 1,749 0.775 228.63 40.98% $5,354,096 $18,149 5.93 _ $3,061 per Unit Attached Dwelling Units 111.20 5,307 - 0.810 90.07 16.150/o $2,109,274 $18,968 47.72 $397 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.00 9 0.800 0.80 0.140/b $18,735 $18,735 9.00 $2,082 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 18.60 818 0.900 16.74 3.00% $392,020 $21,076 43.98 $479 per Unit Resort Lodging Units 9.30 535 0.875 8.14 1.460/a $190,624 $20,497 57.53 $356 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 39.80 2,417,000 0.900 35.82 6.42% $838,839 Y$21,076 60,729 $0.347 per S.F. industrial/Manufacturing Use 187.00 3,638,000 0.950 177.65 31.850/o $4,160,238 $22,247 19,455 $1.144 per S.F TOTAL 557A5 YOO.Oti° 3, ;$25 in Total Storto. prainage Ca0441 N.eedsta`Fulish . ystern Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 6.3 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Community Financial Commitment or Equity -based Proportionality Test Fees Storm Drainage Collection System Proposed Land Use velop8ti': iawt inage Fof tor Storm Drainage Run-off Percentage of Existing Service Catls Allocation of Infrastructure "� , Distribution of ^'Equity" per Acre Average Units or Square Feet/Acre Current Financial Commitment per Unit or Square Foot _ Acres Units 6,436.00 38,616 0.775 4,987.90 60.07% $122,325,402 $19,006 6.00 $3,168 per Unit Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units 1,805.40 36,108 0.810 , 1,462.37 17.61%I $35,863,547 $19,865 _ 20.00 — $993 per Unit Mobile Home Dwelling Units 204.60 2,865 0.800 163.68 1.97% $4,013,573 $19,617 14.00 $1,401 per Unit 1 $689 per Unit Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 33.40 1,070 _ 0.900 30.06 0.36% $737,145 $22,070 32.04 Resort Lodging Units 20.20 809 1 0.875 17.68 0.21% $433,735 $21,472 40.05 $536 per Unit Commercial/Office Uses 841.90 112,836,000 0.900 757.71 9.130/a $18,583,394 $22,073 15,246 $1.448 per S.F. Industrial/Manufacturing Use 930.30 20,261,000 0.950 883.78 10.64% $21,674,517 $23,298 21,779 $1.070 per S.F. 203,631,313 in Total Equity in Current taw EnfotC�MitYASsefs 158,631,313 in Equity:in Storm Drainage Collection System Facilities. $45,OOO,Ooo in Equity in Storm Drainage Basins. $0 in Existing Storm Drainage Impact Fee Fund Balance. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Chapter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection The Existing System. The City's library system consists of five library facilities providing a total of 127,400 square feet. When the 127,400 square feet of the library building space is divided by the City's residential population of 190,377', a space standard of 0.669 square feet/resident is established, (127,400 square feet of library space - 190,377 residents). The City's library operations also house an extensive inventory of 410,594 collection items contained within the five libraries. When the 410,594 collection items are divided by the City's residential service population of 190,3772, a collection item standard of 2.157 library collection items/resident is established, (410,594 collection item's T 190,377 residents). Demand Upon Infrastructure Created by the Development of Underdeveloped or Undeveloped Parcels. Stated simply, the 127,400 square feet of library facilities utilized by the City will accommodate only a finite number of collection items and residents/patrons. Additional residential development will increase the demand on the existing square feet of library pad and the existing collection items. The Purpose of the Fee. The purpose of the fee is to enable the City to collect a fee that would allow the City to construct additional square feet that would ensure that the City's existing and new residents would have adequate and sufficient access to and enjoyment of the library space and collection. The calculation in Table 7-1, following, establishes the City's existing de -facto library standards. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page] Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 82 922 Chapter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection Table 7-1 Calculation of Existing City Library Facilities/Collection Items Standard Library Facility S.F. Collection Items Banning Library 2,400 27,637 Central Library 115,000 314,921 Graham Library 1,200 14,920 Main Street Library 4,500 30,429 Oak View Library 4,300 22,687 Total Library Resources 127,400 410,594 Current Residential Population 190,377 190,377 Existing Standard/Resident 0.669 2.157 Table 7-2, following, indicates that the remaining residential dwelling development and typical number of residents per type of residential dwelling will generate a need for 11,443 additional square feet in order to maintain the existing library facility standard of 0.669 square feet per person. Table 7-2 Square Feet Required to Maintain Existing Facility Standard Residential Land -Use Number of Units Persons per, Dwelling Resident. , Yield Detached Dwellings Units 1,749 3.053 5,095 Attached Dwellings Units 5,307 2.257 11,978 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 9T 1.660 16 Additional Residential Population to be Served 17,089 Square Foot per Person Existing Standard 0.669 Square Feet Required to Maintain Existing Standard 11,433 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 83 923 Chanter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection The library system also has a collection of 410,594 collection items' generating a collection standard of 2.157 collection items per resident within the system (410,594 collection item's 190,377 persons). Table 6-3, following, indicates the additional number of residents to be served and the number of collection items required to maintain the existing standard. The City will need to acquire roughly 36,861 collection items to maintain the existing 2.028 collection items per person in light of the additional 17,089 additional Huntington Beach residents expected at General Plan build -out. Table 7-3 Collection items Required to Maintain Existing Standard Residential - Land -Use Number of Units Persons per Dwelling Resident =, Yield Detached Dwellings 1,749 2.913 5,095 Attached Dwellings 7,207 2.257 11,978 Mobile Home Dwellings 9 1.822 16 Additional City Population to be Served 17,089 Collection Items per Person Existing Standard 2.157 Collection Items Required to Maintain Existing Standard 36,861 The Use of the Fee. The fee, if adopted, would be imposed, collected, and, as needed (and desired), expended on expansion of the amount of library facility space in the two libraries and the number of collection items in the system's collection. The library staff has indicated that the proceeds of any Library development impact fee would be used to expand the Banning Library from its 2,400 square feet to approximately 12,500 square feet and expansion of the existing 4,500 square feet Main Street Branch Libraries into the remaining 4,804 square feet (for a total of 9,304 square feet) in the same building after the current tenant chooses to move elsewhere. Collection items would be expanded in proportion with the population increase, most likely into the additional proposed library space. The Relationship Between the Need for the Fee and the Type of Development Project. The development of any acreage zoned for residential uses, increases the demand on the finite amount of library space and collection items. Thus, those residential land uses that generate higher numbers of residents (i.e., detached dwelling) will be charged a proportionally higher amount. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 84 924 Chapter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection There is no information available demonstrating a substantive link between library use and local businesses. Library use is primarily by residents as opposed to business persons. The Relationship Between the Use of the Fee and the Type of Development Paving the Fee. Additional square feet will be constructed with the DIFs collected from residential development and additional collection items will be added to the existing collection. If not adopted and used to expand the City's existing Library standards' the level of service will decrease by about 8.3 % to 0.620 square feet and 1.98 collection items per resident at General Plan build -out. The Library DIFs, if adopted, imposed and collected, cannot be used for any other purpose than their stated use of maintaining the existing library standards. The Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost of the Portion of the Facility Attributed to the Development Project. The cost of acquiring land for additional library space and construction is about $520.63 per square footl, (per Schedule 6.1). The 127,400 square feet of library space, when divided by the 190,377 existing potential patrons create a standard of 0.669 square feet of library space per City resident. The standard of 0.669 square foot standard multiplied by the $520.63 per square foot of pad cost of library construction results in a charge of $348.30 per additional City resident. Table 7-4 following, demonstrates this. Table 7-4 Establishment of the Library Facilities Standard and Cost per Person to Maintain the Standard Library Facilities Owned Square Feet 127,400 Current City Service Population 190,377 Square Feet per Resident Standard 0.669 Cost of Library Building Construction per Square Foot $520.63 Square Feet per Resident Standard 0.669 Cost per Additional Resident $348.30 The cost of acquiring additional collection items, called the accession process, (per Schedule 6.1) is estimated by the Library staff to cost roughly $25.00 per collection item. The 410,594 collection items, when divided by the City's 190,377 population create a standard of 2.028 collection items per City resident. The standard of 2.157 collection item standard multiplied by the $25.00 per collection item results in a cost of $53.93 per additional City resident, in order to maintain the existing standard. Table 7-5 following, demonstrates this. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 85 925 Chapter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection Table 7-5 Establishment of the Library Collection Standard and Cost per Person to Maintain the Standard Library Collection Items 410,594 Current City Service Population 190,377 Collection Items per Resident Standard 2.157 Cost of Library Collection per Collection item $25.00 Collection Items per Resident Standard 2.157 Cost per Additional Resident $53.93 Resulting,Impact Costs. The combined cost per new resident is $402.23, consisting of $348.30 for 0.669 square feet of library space and $53.93 for 2.157 additional collection items. Table 7-6, following, indicates the amount required for pro -rats expansion of the library space per Schedule 7.1. If adopted and imposed on the remaining development, it would collect enough to acquire land for and construct an additional 11,432 square feet of public library space and an additional 36,861 collection items. Table 7-6 Summary of Library Space and Collection Impact Costs Residents er Dwellwg. Cost per .__ Residert Impact Cost _ - Per Unit Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 $402.23 $1,172/Dwellin Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $402.23 $908/Dwellin Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.8221 $402.23 $733/Dwelling Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 86 Chapter 7 Public Library Facilities and Collection RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES • Adopt Schedule 7.1 which contains the recommended City Library Facilities and Collection (item) Development Impact Fees and is summarized in Table7-6. • Establish a General Plan square foot standard for Library Facilities square feet per resident and a standard for Collection Items per resident. Chapter Endnotes 1. Based upon the 2011 State of California Department of Finance City population estimate of 190,377. 2. The current population of 190,377 establishes the existing standard. 3. A collection item is generally a book but can also be a CD, magazine subscription, video tape or some other like item with a similar cost and accession cost. 4. Based upon the construction cost of a 30,000 square foot library constructed in Highland, CA at a cost of $11,500,000 and increased by the Engineering News Record construction cost index increase of 14.95% over the 01/06 construction date (or $441.63 per square foot) and land acquisition at a cost of $20 per square foot of land with a FAR (floor area ratio) of 0.20 requiring five square feet of land per square foot of building pad. 06/2010 ENR- CCI = 8805 divided by the 01/06 ENR - CCI of 7660 = 14.95 percent increase. 5. The accession process includes: needs research, ordering, receipt, preparation, entering it into the computer and actual placement on the shelves. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report . 87 927 Schedule 7.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Public Library Facilities and Collection Library Library Space Collection Banning Library 2,400 I 27,637 Central Library 115,000 314,921 Graham Library i 1,200 14,920 Main Street Library 4,500 30,429 Oak View Library 4,300 22,687 } Existing Square Feet of Library Space 127,400 .......................... Existing Library Collection Items <i <€>'; 410,594 Calculation of Existing Standards: Current Population (Residents) 190,377 190,377 S.F. of Library Space/Resident 0.669 _ - Collection Items/Resident 2.157 Library Construction/Square Foot 06/2010 $440.63 >' Land Acquisition at $20.00/S.F. and 0.25 FAR. $80.00 Land Acquisition and Construction per Square Foot $520.63 iCost per Collection item ` ` $25.00 Cost per Square Foot or Collection item $520.63 $25.00 Existing City Library Standard(s) 0.669 2.157 Cast of Space per Resident $348.30 `> Cost of Collection Item per Resident $53.93 Type of Density Library Library Total Residential per Dwelling Space Collection Library Dwelling Unit Unit ( Component Component Impact Fee Detached Dwelling Unit 2.913 Attached Dwelling Unit 2.257. Mobile Home Dwelling Unit 1.822 $1,015 $157 $1,172 $786 $122 $908 $635 $98 $733 Revenue & O st Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Chapter S Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development (including Open Space) This Chapter summarizes the City's existing inventory of parks and identifies the ratio of park land (and park facilities improvements) per resident allowable under the Quimby Act (§66477 of the Government Code) for residential developments involving the subdivision of land and AB1600 (§66000) for the construction of residential developments not involving the subdivision of land. The existing per capita standard is then utilized to calculate the park dedication requirement for future residential development. EXISTING PARKS AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS SYSTEM Open space notwithstanding, intensive parks and recreational facilities constitute one of the City of City of Huntington Beach's greatest needs both with respect to facilities for current residents and future citizens. The provision of a well -planned park system, with a variation in the size and nature of facilities offered, is an important amenity to residents of any city, the City of City of Huntington Beach included. A mixture of passive and active uses and facilities and programs which appeal to a broad spectrum of potential park and trail users are considered optimal in most urban cities. The City currently has at its disposal (and within general control) some 999.09 acres of park, beach and specialty uses for use by the City's many residents. However, not all of these acres are owned by the City, many are leased or owned by other agencies made available to the City via a joint use agreements with the various school districts or are S.C.E. right-of-way. The current acres dedicated to park use (and owned or under long-term control by the City) can reasonably well serve the City's current needs. However if the number of owned park acres remains static at 778.41 acres, the City may not be able to continue to meet recreational demands in light the probable 9.0 % increase in the City's population. At an attempt to achieve a high level of fairness, the City's owned park acreage will be used as the standard for calculating the park standard and the development impact fee schedule. The figure is a Government Code statute -based calculation and thus does not include other park opportunities in the area such as Harriet Weider Regional Park, which while clearly serving the City residents, are not City -facilities and thus cannot be programmed by the City. The City has a General Plan standard target of 5.0 acres per 1,000 acres per residents and the calculation of target does include the park acres of other agencies (i.e. the regional park and state-owned beach land) within the calculation of that General Plan Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 89 �29 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development target. That is completely acceptable for General Plan issues, and the City does meet that General Plan standard. Future residential development, by increasing the City's population, will impact the City's park system by requiring additional athletic fields, adequate space for various athletic activities and community center space. Given the magnitude of growth projected in this and other reports, the challenge facing the City will be to provide new facilities and park land to serve the recreational needs of these new residents. Without additional park land acquisition and development of currently owned but underutilized park land during the remaining period of private residential development, the City's parks will become overcrowded and overused, with the ultimate result becoming a negative experience for park users. Existing Park Land and Omen Space Land. Currently, the City owns (or has long -tern control of) approximately 778.41 acres of traditional park land, about 87.9 %(683.9 acres) of it, developed. The entire list of parks and their acreage is identified on Schedule 8.1 at the conclusion of this Chapter with a summary by type in Table 8-1. Central Park is the largest developed park, representing just under a half of the park system acreage and provides the greatest variety of sports and passive uses. Table 8-1 Current Park Total Inventory Total _� C4ty.. Park Owned - -.... Acre..._ .....c es. Neighborhood Parks 183.79 129.74 Community/Sports Parks 546.82 470.81 Other (beaches, etc) 268.48 177.86 Total Acres (Owned) 999.09 778.41 City Park Standard. Table 8-2, following, is a comparison of the acreage of parks to the City of Huntington Beach's current population and indicates that the City presently possesses a total standard of 5.248 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, (999.09 park acres—, [190,377 resident's 1,0001, rounded). However as stated previously, the owned acreage will be used to calculate the standard and resulting impact fee. The City presently owns 778.41 acres and thus possesses an owned standard of 4.089 acres of owned park land per 1,000 residents, (778.41 owned park acre's - [190,377 resident's - 1,000], rounded). This is above the benchmark of 3.0 acres per Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 90 930 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development 1,000 persons contained in Section 66477 of the California Government Code relating to dedication of parks. Table 8-2 Calculation of Actual City -owned and Developed Park Acres Standard _= ark Acre. Owned Perk �4res Current Park Acres 999.09 778.41 Current City Population 190,377 190,377 Population Stated in Thousands 190.377 190.377 Park Acres per 1,000 Population 5.248 4.089 The Quimby Act, to be discussed later, allows a minimum standard of 3.0 acres per thousand resident's even if the City has not attained that standard. However, the park acres owned standard for the City of Huntington Beach, at 4.089 acres per 1,000 resident's, exceeds that minimum standard and thus the Quimby allowable minimum standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 new residents is irrelevant and the 4.089 acres/1,000 resident's standard will be used for Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development. Though not particularly relevane to the City of Huntington Beach, the Quimby Act has a cap on land dedications required as a part of the subdivision of land of 5.0 acres per thousand (Government Code §66447 (a)(2). Planned Improvements. In addition to the ongoing improvement of the remaining 115.85 acres' available for increased residential development, the City will need to acquire 70.5 additional park acres, per Table 8-3, and develop these new parks to serve the additional 17,089 residents anticipated to live in City of Huntington Beach at General Plan build -out. [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page] Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 91 931 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Table 8-3 Calculation of Required Park Acres per Allowable Standard Future Added Population 17,089 Population Stated in Thousands 17.089 Allowable City of Huntington Beach Park Standard 4.128 Parks Acres Required to Maintain Standard 70.5 The 70.5 acres could be constructed in any of the following configurations: Mini or "Pocket" Parks - This type is the smallest of the park type designations, usually an acre or less. Mini parks are generally not planned due to higher maintenance costs. They are usually the result of the acquisition of an unusual parcel oftentimes with historical or community significance. Tarbox, Booster, Trinidad or Baily Parks are good examples of this category. Local or Neighborhood Parks - These parks are generally 3.0 to six acres and serve local (walk- in distance) users. Not surprisingly, the City has a number of these parks, roughly forty-nine at an average of about 3.5 acres in size. Neighborhood Parks, per the category title, are intended to serve walk-in populations nearby the park and typically are not highly programmed with City -run activities. Community - These parks, to be functional, are usually closer to ten acres or larger and are designed to meet the needs of the entire community. These needs include youth and adult sports organizations, clubs or associations and large scale community events such as 40 of July celebrations or festivals. Langenbeck, Baca., Bartlett, Carr and Gisler Parks are good examples of a broad -based use community park. Sport Parks - These park, again as titled, are highly infrastructure -developed to meet the active sports needs of both youth and adults. Edison and Greer Parks are good examples of the City's sports parks. The proposed park improvements that could be contained within the roughly 65 needed acres and the existing standard (Table 8-2) are consistent with the City's Park and Recreation Element of the General Plan. The City's 3.785 acres per 1,000 population standard speaks reasonably well for the City as a three -acre per 1,000 population standard is the common minimum, but frequently Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 92 932 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development unmet, target of municipalities and recreation and park special districts throughout California. City staff has plans and has identified parcels that would assist help reach the 5.0 acres per 1,000 standard at General Plan build -out. CALCULATION OF PARK DEDICATION STANDARD Unlike the other facilities discussed in this Report, the California Government Code contains specific enabling legislation for the acquisition and development of community and neighborhood parks by a City. This legislation, codified as Section 66477 of the Government Code and known commonly as the "Quimby Act," establishes criteria for charging new development for park facilities based on specific park standards. This Report will recommend the adoption of Quimby - style park fees over an AB 1600-style development impact fee for developments requiring the subdivision of land and an AB 1600 fee for non subdivided land. Allowable Park Standard As stated earlier, under Section 66477 of the Government Code, the City may charge new residential development based on a standard of 3.0 acres per 1,000 population if the City does not presently possess a ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 for the existing population. The Government Code also enables a city to charge development based on a standard higher than 3.0 acres (to a maximum of 5.0 acres) if the City currently exceeds the minimum benchmark ratio of 3.0 acres per 1,000 persons. Schedule 8.1 indicates that the City exceeds that minimum standard (with 3.785 acres/1,000 residents) and may then impose a fee in order to maintain that standard. The law states that "if the amount of existing neighborhood and community park area ... exceeds the [3 acres of park area per 1,000 person] limit ... the legislative body may adopt the calculated amount as a higher standard not to exceed 5 acres per 1,000 persons. i4 Park fees may be required by the City provided that the City meets certain conditions including: • The amount and location of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of the park by the future inhabitants of the subdivision. • The legislative body has adopted a general plan containing a recreational element, and the park and recreational facilities are in accordance with definite principles and standards contained therein. • The city ... shall develop a schedule specifying how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities ... Any fees collected under the ordinance shall be committed within five years after the payment of such fees. Once a per capita standard for parks is determined, the cost of residential development's impact on the City's park system can then be computed as follows: Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 93 933 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Park -land Acquisition Costs. Land costs will vary significantly from one park to another. The park land to be acquired must be suitable for park construction and is somewhat conservatively estimated at approximately $871,200 per acre (or $20.00/square foot) which has been used in the park development impact fee calculation, as a default park development impact fee for ordinary residential dwelling development. This is consistent with the cost of recent development for detached dwelling development in the more northerly areas of the City of Huntington Beach area. However, the use of this $20.00 per square foot figure could be criticized if a developer can show that the cost of the residential land they are developing is currently valued at less than the $871,200/acre figure. Conversely the City should retain the ability to increase this impact fee in areas where the cost of land exceeds the $20.00 per square foot figure. The fee recommendation at the end of the Chapter will recognize this need for flexibility. Park Development Costs. Park development costs are based upon the very recent construction of Schedule 8.3, a current schedule of common park costs and typical improvements by type of park. Schedule 8.2 identifies the three types parks' that the City will likely construct over General Plan build -out' and the costs of the types and numbers of improvements generally included in each of the following and are summarized from Schedule 8.2, identifies the factors in the average costs to develop an acre of park land for the three types, based on figures which are consistent with the probable improvements and costs to build similar parks incurred by other communities. For cost estimate purposes, roughly forty-five acres of Central Park has been identified as higher cost sports park acres with the remainder as Community Park. Sixty acres of beach land has been categorized as neighborhood park due to the nature of the more limited improvement costs. The table also indicates the three major types of parks. The existing 834.06 developed park acres' cost the City an estimated $258,698,242 construct as parks for an average construction cost of $310.168 per acre. Table 8-4 Average Park Construction Cost per Acre Type of Park Park Acres „ Cost/ Acre Average Construction Cost Neighborhood/Mini Park 271.01 $223,441 $60,559,816 Community Park 229.15 $289,296 $66,292,242 Sports/Regional Park 333.90 $394,884 $131,851,622 Total Cost - _ $258,698,242 Total Acres 834.06 = - 834.06 Cost/Acre rounded _ _ $310 168 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 94 934 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development The $310,168/acre is then increased by 15 % to $356,693 to account for the park architectural costs and 24% to $442,299/acre to account for project administration, plan check, engineering, inspection and materials testing costs. Lastly, the $422,299 per acre figure is increased by 15 % to $508,644 for a typical park project contingency. Schedule 8.2 shows this in numeric detail. Schedule 8.3 details the average park construction cost by type of park. The Existing Park Community Center Inventory. The City has a number of facilities dedicated for use as public uses facilities (as opposed to staff facilities). The existing 118,020 square feet of Community Use Facilities are identified in Table 8-5, following. Table 8-5 Inventory of Existing Park Community Use Facilities Community Use Facility Square Peet Beach Public Service Center 2,561 City Gymnasium and Pool Facility 23,600 Edison Community Center 11,065 Harbor View Clubhouse 2,203 Huntington Beach Municipal Art Center 11,092 Huntington Beach Youth Shelter 5,600 Junior Lifeguard Headquarters 5,922 Lake Park Clubhouse 3,000 Lake View Clubhouse 2,000 LeBard Clubhouse 1,000 Murdy Community Center 11,000 Newland Barn 6,000 Newland House Museum 2,750 Oak View Community Center 10,000 Rodgers Senior Center 14,000 Seniors Outreach Center 2,700 Shipley Nature Center Interpretive Building 1,863 Terry Park Community Center 1,664 Total Community Use Facilities Square Feet 118,020 Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 95 935 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development The City has 118,020 public use community center square feet as identified in Table 8-5 previous. When divided by the City's 849.58 acres of developed park land the result indicates an average of 138.92 square feet of community center per acre of developed park. At the development cost of $480.00 per square foot of community center, there is a cost of $66,680 for the 138.92 average square feet of public uses facilities per acre of existing developed park (138.92 square feet multiplied by the $480 per square foot of community center construction). The $66,680 represents the future cost of maintaining the existing square feet of community center per acre of park, and as a result, per capita. Average Park Acquisition and Development Cost per Capita. The combined park acquisition and development cost is $1,446,524 per acre ($871,200/acre for acquisition, $508,644 per acre for development and $77,780 for community center space acquisition). If the City were to charge development for the maximum allowable amount of park acreage as allowed in the Quimby Act and as recommended here, then the City would need to acquire 4.128 acres of new park land for every potential 1,000 new residents to the City. The 4,128 acres of land acquisition and park and community center improvements per 1,000 persons would be $6,130,008 or about 6,130.01 per new resident. Table 8-6 and Schedule 8.1 calculates the cost, per type of residential dwelling, to develop 4.089 acres, which represents the required park land cost for 1,000 persons. Table 8-6 Summary of Quimby Park/AB1600 Development Impact Fees for Residential Dwelling Construction Persons per Fee per Impact Fie - _ -Res�dentiat Land X3se _we11 _ Resident Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 $6,130.01 $17, 857 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 $6,130.01 $13,385 Mobile Home Dwellin Umtsj 1.822 $6,130.01 $11,169 The development impact fees for residential detached dwelling development involving the subdivision of land, as identified in Table 8-6, should be adopted under the auspices of the Quimby Act. The development impact fees for residential dwelling units not requiring the subdivision of a parcel, will need to be adopted as an AB 1600-supported development impact fee. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 96 936 Chapter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Open Space Fees for Business Uses. Imagine a community without any (or very little) park or open space. There a small number of such communities in the greater Los Angeles area. All private development benefits from the acquisition of land that is never developed, and exists, at a minimum, as a buffer from all other businesses. Schedule 8.4 identifies the cost for park land (as open space) for the business type land -uses. Again, the City owns 778.4 acres of park space which at a minimum acts as open space for all land uses. There are 10,271.8 acres of privately held developed land within the City's limits. As a result there is 0.0758 acres of park/open space for each developed privately held acre. The 0.0758 acres of open space per privately held acre is the recommended standard to be applied to the development of vacant parcels zoned for the business uses of commercial and resort lodging, commercial/office and industrial/manufacturing uses. The open space land acquisition cost will be limited to 25 % of the $20.00 per square foot (or $871,200 per acre) acquisition cost based upon the premise that business use benefits largely from the open space component and but does not require the benefits of developed parks and that open space land acquisition costs are less than land appropriate for parks. The cost to acquire that 0.0578 acre of park land would be $16,605. Again the cost is limited to only open space land acquisition, but does not include the development component of that land as a park. That will fall to the developers of residentially zoned land that will generate park users (residents). Business acres benefit from the parks as open areas that make the City a desirable location for that business. The $300,000 per acre of development will be divided by the varying units from the three differing types of business uses in Table 8-7. Schedule 8.5 is summarized in Table 8-7 following. Table 8-7 Cost Calculation for Business Uses Res rdentrai Latid Use in or S. per Cost�Acre of Open _ace Cost per I£eyed Roocu or- S.. uare=Foot Commercial Lodging Unit 36 $16,505 $458 Resort Lodging Unit 46 $16,505 $359 Commercial/Office Square Feet 17,300 $16,505 $0.954 Industrial Square Feet 21,390 $16,505 $0.772 Note: A lodging unit is defined as keyed room. Land Acquisition Cost Adjustment Challenge. As mentioned previously, the use of $871,200/acre as the default park land acquisition cost is based upon the assumption that parks acreage would likely be close in proximity and thus similar in cost to residential land value of the private project the park is intended to serve. However, if the developer or contractor of a home can provide Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 97 937 Chanter 8 Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development evidence (acceptable to the City), in the form of a recent purchase agreement or appraisal of the property they will be developing that the current land value is worth less than the $871,200/acre (or a $20.00/square foot), the development impact fee could be adjusted accordingly by placing the actual cost of land acquisition into the Schedule 8.1 calculation. Again, if the City wishes to adopt such an adjustment, the terms under which the challenge may be made and proved should be included in the Development Impact Fee Ordinance. Similarly, if a development is closer to the beach area and land costs are higher, the City should be able to impose a park development impact fee consistent with the local land acquisition costs. Schedule 8.1 shows this calculation. RECAP OF RECOMMENDED PARK LAND ACQUISITION AND PARK FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. • Schedule 8.1 contains the maximum Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Impact Fees to be imposed upon residential development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter for default or standard residential developments. • Schedule 8.4 contains the maximum Park/Open Space Land Acquisition Impact Fees to be imposed upon business development based upon the facts presented in this Chapter. CHAPTER ENDNOTES 1. Adoption of a Quimby Act fee requires a Park "plan". 2. The figure has relevance for municipalities that have large tracts of land available for subdivisions in the thousands or more. 3. The Quimby Act does allow use of revenues raised by the adoption of a Quimby Act Park Impact Fee to be used for rehabilitation of existing parks. 4. California Government Code, Title 7, Division 2, Section 66477 (b). 5. Totaling the roughly 64.7 acres of park land acquisition and development that could be expected to be financed by imposing the proposed development impact fees over General Plan build -out. 6. Mini parks are not included in the mix as they are very costly to construct on a per acre cost and generally are expensive maintenance factors. Mini parks are rarely planned for but generally occur as a result of a land donation or as the recognition of a historical site. 7.Based upon the 1,006.58 acres of parkland available, less the 45.01 acre Weider County Regional Park and the 127.51 un-improved park acres of City Parks. Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Report 98 °38 Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub -divided AB1600 Fee for Dwelling on Non -subdivided and Nexus Report Parcel, and; Parcels Park Size City Owned Parkland i3ea ilopef PSCarljd Lake Park 4.75 0.00 4.75 Lake View Park 2.16 2.16 2.16 Lamb Park 2.60 2.60 0.00 Lambert Park 3.50 3.50 3.50 Langenbeck Park 17.02 9.24 17.02 Lark View Park 3,65 0.00 3.65 LeBard Park 4.99 3.01 4.99 Manning Park 2.46 2.46 i 2.46 _ Marina Park 9.34 9.34 9.34 ' Marine View Park 2.96 0.00 2.96 McCallen Park 5.84 5.84 5.84 Meadowlark Golf Course 98.00 98.00 98.00 Moffett Park 2.38 2.38 2.38 Murdy Park 16.04 16.04 16.04 Newland Park 2.94 2.94 2.94 Oak View Center Park 1.31 0.00 1.31 Weider Regional (County -owned) 45.01 0.00 23.01 Pattinson Park j 3.51 3.51 51 ��, Perry Park 1.88 1.88 .88 Pleasant View Park 2.17 0.00 2.17 Prince Park 0.22 0.22 0.22 Robinwood Park 1.41 0.00 1.41 Rodgers Senior Center Site 2.01 2.01 2.01 'Schroeder Park 2.37 0.00 2.37 Seabridge Park 3.91 3.91 3.91 Seeley Park 3.37 3.37 3.37 Sowers Park 2.65 2.65 2.65 Sun View Park 2.45 0.00 2.45 Talbert Park 5.44 5.44 5.44 Tarbox Park 0.44 0.44 0.44 Terry Park 4.81 4.81 4.81 Triangle Park 1.11 1.11 1.11 Trinidad Park 0.75 0.75 0.75 Wardlow Park 8.36 8.36 8.36 Wieder Park 4.80 4.80 4.80 Worthy Community Park 7.00 7.00 7.00 _ Total Acres (Owned/Developed) 999.09 778.41 849.58 Current Population 190,377 190,377 190,377 Population/1,000 190.38 190.38 190.38 Current Standard 5.248 4.089 , 4.463 99 939 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA Schedule 8.1 City of Huntington Beach 2011-12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Park Quimby Fee for Dwellings on a Sub -divided Parcel, and; AB1600 Fee for Dwelling on Non -subdivided Parcels Acres11,000 Population Standard Quimby Maximum Allowable Acquisition Cost per Acre (1) Construction Cost per Acre (2) Community Center Construction Total Component Cost Cost X Standard Population Served by Standard Cost per Resident Occupants/ Dwelling Detached Dwelling Units 2.913 Attached Dwelling Units 2.257 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 1.822 Park► Owned Developed Size :Parkland Parkland 5,248 5.000 4.089 4.089 $871,200� $871,200 $3,562,337 1,000.0 $3,562.34 Land Acquistion $10,377 $8,040 $6,491 4.463 4.463 $508,644 G $66,680 $575,324 $2,567,671 1,000.0 $2, 567.67 Park Development $7,480 $5,795 $4,678 1. Current estimate of $20.00 per acre acquisition cost for land consistent with park use. 2. See Schedule 9.3 for typical park amenity construction cost details. Total Fee Per Person $6,130.01 $17,857 $13,835 $11,169 100 940 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Calculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost Prince Park French Park Tarbox Park Davenport Beach Humbolt Beach Park City Gym/Pool Site Finley Park Bailey Park Trinidad Park Booster Park Triangle Park Banning/Magnolia Park Oak View Center Park Robinwood Park Franklin Park Perry Park _ Rodgers Senior Center Site Helme Park Bauer Park Lake View Park Pleasant View Park ----- -- ---- Drew Park Circle View Park Schroeder Park Bushard Park Moffett Park _- Sun View Park Manning Park _ Burke Park Arevelos Park Lamb Park Sowers Park Eader Park Hawes Park Bolsa View Park College View Park _ Conrad Park Clegg -Stacey Park Golden View Park Newland Park Haven View Park Marine View Park Glen View Park _ 'Seeley Park I Lambert Park Park Average Cost Total Cost Size per Acre for Park 0.22 0.33 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.56 0.59 0.75 0.85 1.11 0.00 1.31 1.41 1.52 1.88 2.01 2.02 2.04 2.16 2.17 2.28 2.31 2.37 2.38 2.38 2.45 2.46 2.50 2.58 0.00 2.65 2.68 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.71 2.80 2.81 2.94 2.95 2.96 3.02 3.37 3.50 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223.441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $223,441 $49,157 $73,736 $98,314 $102,783 $107, 252 $111,721 $125,127 $131,830 $167 , 581 $189,925 $248,020 $0 $292,708 $315,052 $339,631 $420,070 $449,117 $451 ,351 $455,820 $482, 633 $484,868 $509,446 $516,149 $529,56>6 $531,790 $531,790 $ 547, 431 $549,665 $558,603 S576,478 $0 $592,119 $598,823 $598,823 $603,291 $603,291 $605,526 $625,636 $627,870 $656,917 $659,152 $661,386 $674,793 $752,997 $782,044 101 941 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA Schedule 8.2 City of Huntington Beach Park Site Inventory Improvement Cost Residential Park Development Impact Fee Calculation of Average Park Acre Construction Cost Park Size 3.51 3.52 3.61 3.65 3.91 4.02 4.04 4.75 4.80 4.81 4.99 5.44 5.84 6.60 6.83 8.36 9.34 98.00 10.72 2.91 11.67 14.35 17.02 19.66 2.00 90.62 60.20 7.00 10.44 16.04 47.18 253.24 $784, 279 $786,513 $806, 623 $815,561 $873,655 $898,234 $902,703 $1,061,346 $1,072,518 $1,074,752 $1,114, 972 $1,215,520 $1,304,897 $1,474,712 $1,526,104 $1,867,969 $2,086,941 $21,897,243 $3,101,256 $841,852 $3, 376, 088 $4,151,402 $4,923,823 $5,687,565 $578, 593 $26,216,029 $17,415,636 $2, 764,185 $4,122,584 $6,333,932 $18,630,607 $100,000,314 $258,698,680 834.06 $310,168 115,00% $356,693 124.00 $442,299 115.00% $508,614 IMA 942 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park Pub Imps, Road/curb, gutter, etc. Lg Pk Grading/Irrigation/Turf Sm Pk Grading/Irrigation/Turf Plant Material: _ Trees-5, 24 gallon box/acre Trees-15, 15 gallon/acre Shrubs-10, five gallon Shrubs-30, one gallon Play apparatus Curbing, 450' per large Curbing, 225' per small Play equipment - large Play equipment - medium Play equipment - small Sand/Other Surfacing Buildings: Restroom - Small Restroom - Large Equipment storage facility Combined Restroom/Concession Parking Lot 4" A.C. W/6" Rock base V-gutter Drain Inlet Drain inlet connector Storm drain line i Drive approach ParimatPr nurhinn $41.30 Linear Foot i 225 $9,293 $123,750 Lot 0 $0 $99,000 Lot 1 $99,000 $67,500 Lot 0 _ $0 -- $5,775 Lot 1 $5,775 Unit Cost, Installed 5 Acre Neighborhood 20 Acre Community Park $200 Unit Cost, Installed 5 Acre Neighborhood 20 Acre Community Park $200 Linear Foot 1,440 $208,000 $37,500 Acre 0 ; $0 $42,750 Acre j 5 $213,750 $149 Each 60 $8,940 $290 Each 30 $8,700 $30 Each 40 $1,200 $8 Each 120 $960 $41.30 Linear Foot 0 $0 $132,000 Each 1 $132,000 $181 ,500 Each 0 $0 $99,000 Each 0 $0 $297,000 Each 0 $0 $8.30 Square foot $13.20 Linear Foot $990 Each $330 Each $19.80 Linear Foot_ $2,970 Each $16.50 Linear Foot Striping $0.50 Linear Foot Lighting $2,970 Each Lot signage $330 Lot Entrance $4,950 Lot Curb and Gutter 515.27 Linear Foot Storm Drainage Facilities Inlets $1,320 Each Connections $2,145 Each Lateral (to arterial) $82.50 Linear Foot Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial $4,125 Lot Line in street $107.30 Linear Foot Line in park $24.80 Linear Foot 12,000 1 300 1 1 300 1 490 ; 400 2 1 1 3,780 $99,600 j $3,960 $990 $330 $5,940 $2,970 $8,085 $200 $5, 940 $330 $4,950 $57,721 2 $2,640 2 $4,290 45 $3,713 1 $4,125 ' 29 $3,112 125 $3,100 2,704 $540,800 15 $562,500 0 $0 225 $33,525 75 $21,750 150 $4,500 450 $3,600 450 $18,585 225 $9,293 1 $123,750 0 $0 2 $135,000 3 $17,325 1 $132,000 1 $181,500 0 $0 1 $297,000 40,000 $332,000 800 $10,560 2 $1,980 2 $660 200 $3,960 4 $11,880 800 $13,200 1,300 $650 18 $53,460 3 $990 3 $14,850 3,232 $49,353 4 $5,280 4 $8,580 80 $6,600 1 $4,125 80 $8,584 1,500 $37,200 103 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 103 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park nit Cost, Installed Fire Hydrant $4,950 Each Street Lights Standards $2,475 Each Duct work/wiring $1,568 Each Water Facilities 3" metered service $4,125 Each Backflow device $4,125 Each inA in StrAP.t S19.80 Linear Foot Water fountains S1 ,155 Each Fountain lines in park $19.80 Linear Foot Benches/Tables Tables, cement pads $2,475 Each Individual grills I $825 Each Benches, cement pads $908 Each Bleachers $5,775 Each _ Large Covered Picnic Area (lot) S123,750 Each Individual Covered Picnic Pad $24,750 Each User Electrical Service park $16,500 Each Electrical Service per Area $2,063 Each Game Courts Basketball C_ ourts $66,000 Each Basketball Court Lighting $57,750 Each Fenced Tennis Courts $991000 Each Tennis Court Lighting $57,750 Each Y Baseball Field - Competitive $82,500 Each Ballfield Lighting $412,500 Per two fields Baseball Field - Recreational $24,750 Each Pedestrian Walkway 5' Wide $22.28 Linear Foot 6' Wide $28.88 Linear Foot 9' Wide $37.13 Linear Foot Miscellaneous Flatwork $6.20 Linear Foot Small Park Signage $4,538 Lot Large Park Signage $24,750 Lot Bike Rack/Pad $2,890 Each Natural Element Improvement (Lake, e $825,000 Each Small Concrete Stage $41 ,250 Each Small Ampitheater stage only, graded $82,500 Each Larqe Ampitheater with bowl 1$247,SOO Each -5Acre Neighborhood 20 Adre Community Park 1 $4,950 6 $29,700 3 $7,425 20 $49,500 3 $4,704 12 $18,816 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 1 $4,125 1,320 $26,136 120 $2,376 1 $1,155 8 $9,240 200 $3,960 i 1,000 $19,800 4 $9,900 60 $148,500 2 $1,650 30 $24,750 4 $3,632 30 $27,240 0 $0 0 , $0 0 j s0 ' 2 $247,500 1 $24,750 10 $247,500 0 $0 1 $16,500 1 $2,063 6 $12,378 $0 $0 1.0 $66,000 1 $66,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 $198,000 0 $0 1 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $24,750 1 6 $148,500 500 $11,140 2,000 $44,560 100 $2,888 500 $14,440 100 1. $3,713 500 ; $3,100 500 $18,565 8,500 $52,700 1 $4,538 0 $0 0 $0 1 $24,750 1 $2,890 6 $17,340 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $247,500 4 444 I 1,117,206 339 Tota Cost '$ , Total Acres 5 15 892 4 2 96 v A era e Cost per Acre $223 4 1 $ 104 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park =' Unit Cost Instalfed Pub Imps, Road/curb, gutter, etc. $200 Linear Foot Lg Pk Grading/Irrigation/Turf $37,500 Acre Sm Pk Grad! ng/irrigation/Turf $42,750 Acre Plant Material: Trees-5, 24 gallon box/acre $149 Each Trees-15, 15 gallon/acre $290 Each Shrubs-10, five gallon $30 Each Shrubs-30, one gallon $8 Each Play apparatus Curbing, 450' per large $41.30 Linear Foot Curbing, 225' per small $41.30 Linear Foot Play equipment - large $123,750 Lot Play equipment - medium $99,000 Lot Play equipment - small $67,600 Lot Sand/Other Surfacing $5,775 Lot Buildings: Restroom - Small $132,000 Each Restroom - Large $181,500 Each Equipment storage facility $99,000 Each Combined Restroom/Concession $297,000 Each Parking Lot 4" A.C. W/6" Rock base $8.30 Square foot V-gutter $13.20 Linear Foot Drain Inlet $990 Each Drain Inlet connector $330 Each Storm drain line $19.80 Linear Foot Drive approach $2,970 Each Perimeter curbing $16.50 Linear Foot Striping $0.50 Linear Foot Lighting $2,970 Each Lot signage $330 Lot Entrance $4,950 Lot Curb and Gutter $15.27 Linear Foot Storm Drainage Facilities Inlets $1,320 Each Connections $2,145 Each Lateral (to arterial) $82.50 Linear Foot Sewer Facilities Connection to arterial $4,125 Lot Line in street $107.30 Linear Foot Line in park $24.80 Linear Foot 20 Acre. Sports Park . 2,704 $540,800 20 $750,000 0 $0 150 $22,350 50 $14,500 100 $3,000 300 $2,400 450 $18,585 225 $9,293 0 $0 1 $99,000 2 $135,000 3 $17,325 1 $132,000 1 $181,500 1 $99,000 2 $594,000 40,000 $332,000 800 $10,560 2 $1,980 2 $660 200 $3,960 4 $11,880 800 $13,200 1,300 $650 18 $53,460 3 $990 3 $14,850 1,664 $25,409 4 $5,280 4 $8,580 80 $6,600 1 $4,125 80 $8,584 1,500 $37,200 105 Revenue & Cost 310ecialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 8.3 City of Huntington Beach Development Impact Fee Calculation Report Park Improvement Cost Estimates, by Type of Park Fire Hydrant Street Lights _ Standards Duct work/wiring Water Facilities 3" metered service Backflow device Line in street Water fountains _ Fountain lines in park Benches/Tables Tables, cement pads Individual grills i Benches, cement pads Bleachers Large Covered Picnic Area (lot) Individual Covered Picnic Pad User Electrical Service park Electrical Service per Area Game Courts Basketball Courts Basketball Court Lighting _ Fenced Tennis Courts Tennis Court Lighting Baseball Field - Competitive Ballfield Lighting Baseball Field - Recreational Pedestrian Walkway 5' Wide 6' Wide 9' Wide Miscellaneous Flatwork Small Park Signage Large Park Signage Bike Rack/Pad Natural Element Improvement (Lake, e Small Cnncrete StaaP Unit Cost, Installed 24 Acre Sports Park ! I 0 Each 1 $4,950 $2,475 Each $1,568 Each 20 $49,500 5 $7,640 $4,125 Each 1 $4,125 S4,125_ Each 1 $4,125 $19.80 Linear Foot 120 $2,376 $1 ,155 Each i 8 I $9,240 $19.80 Linear Foot 1,000 $19,800 $2,475 Each 30 $74,250 _ $825 Each 10 $8,250 $908 Each 15 $13,620 S5,775 Each 8 $46,200 $123,750 Each 0 $0 $24,750 Each 4 $99,000 $16,500 Each 1 $16,500 $2,063 Each 4 $8,252 $0 $66;000 Each i 3 $198,000 $57,750 Each 8 $462,000 $99,000 Each 8 $792,000 $57,750 Each 8 $462,000 $82,500 Each 8 $660,000 $412,500 Per two fields 4 $1,650,000 S24,750 Each 0 $0 I $22.28 Linear Foot 1,000 $28.88 Linear Foot 250 $37.13 Linear Foot 250 $6.20 Linear Foot 4,000 $4,538 Lot 0 $24,750 Lot ` 1 $2,890 Each 6 $825,000 Each i 0 $41,250 Each 1 $82,500 Each 0 247 500 Each 0 Small Ampitheater stage only, graded Large heater with bowl $ $22, 280 $7, 220 $9,283 $24,800 $0 $24,750 $17,340 $0 $41 ,250 $0 $0 Total Cost $7,897,671 Total Acres 20.00 Average Cost per Acre $394,884 i. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 Schedule 8.4 City of Huntington Beach 2011--12 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Open Space Land Acquisition for Business Uses Land Acquisition Development Impact Fee Calculation Total City -owned Park/Open Space Acres Current City-wide Privately Developed Acres Current Open Space Standard per Developed Acre Acres/Developed Acre Standard Acquisition Cost per Acre Cost X Open Space Standard Open Space Land Value Adjusted Land Cost Units/SF per Acre Commercial Lodging Keyed Units 36 Resort Lodging Keyed Units 46 Commercial Acres (in Square Feet) 17,300 Industrial Uses (in Square Feet) 21,390 778.4 10,271.8 0.0758 0.0758 $871,200 $66,037 25.00%; $16,509.24 Open Space - Acquisition $459 per Keyed Unit $359 per Keyed Unit $0.954 per Square Foot $0.772 per Square Foot 107 Revenue9l Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, 92831 CA APPENDIX A Expanded Land -use Database UEN City. of Huntington Beach dotal -;Land Ilse Database Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Total - City Limits Private Residences Commercial Lodging Rooms Business Square Feet kis#ing Community' as Cur rrentTDeveloped Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units CommerciaUOffice Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Existing Community Additional. Uriits from Intensification of Existing'Uses Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Redeveloped Sped#a Plan A Beach, antl .Edingor Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Sub -total Specific Plan A Develops Net Increase `f: TUtI #.vf Units Acres of Ur1itS Acres # of lJnrts ` 6,436.0 38,616 295.00 1,749 6,731.00 40,365 1,805.4 36,108 111.20 5,307 1,916.60 41,415 204.6 2,865 1.00 9 205.60 2,874 33.4 1,070 18.60 818 52.00 1,888 20.2 809 9.30 535 29.50 1,344 841.9 12,836,000 39.80 2,417,000 881.70 15,253,000 930.3 20,261.000 187.00 3,638,000 1,117.30 23,899,000 10,271.8 ----- 661.90 ----- 10,933.70 ----- 8,446.0 77,589 407.2 7,065 8,853.2 84,654 53.6 1,879 27.9 1,353 81.5 3,232 1,772.2 33,097,000 226.8 6,055,000 1,999.0 39,152,000 Oeeloped . To a3e Deuloped Total Acres #'of Units Acres # of Urarts Acres # of 10J. . 6,436.0 38,616 1,805.4 36,108 204.6 2,865 33.4 1,070 20.2 809 841.9 12,836,000 930.3 20,261,000 10,271.8 ----- 34.0 183 15.0 159 1.0 9 0.0 0 3.4 300 4.5 69,200 44.0 958,320 101.90 ---- 6,470.00 38,799 1,820.40 36,267 205.60 2,874 33.40 1,070 23.60 1,109 846.40 12,905,200 974.30 21,219,320 10,373.70 Vital n ensifedfRe ieveloped fleveloped Acres Acres # vftinits . 0.0 0 261.0 1,566 261.00 1,566 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 14.6 468 14.60 468 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 106.2 2,313,817 106.20 2,313,817 0.0 0 143.0 2,679,680 143.00 2,679,680 0.0 524.80 ----- 524.80 --- -� IntensifiedfRedevWdp.ed Total: De ielgped Acres < #af 1 in�ts acres # of I:)n�ts Acres , # of Unrts! .`. 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0. 0 80.0 4,500 80.00 4,500 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 4.0 350 4.00 350 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 37.0 850,400 37.00 109850,400 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 - 121.00 ----- 121.00 ---- 949 Speck #fan 8 >; Deefoped Intensifiedlfedeveiaped TOt .Downtown Acrag.,'' # of tJnits Acres:(3} # of Units Acres �►f:Unrt , Detached Dwelling Units (1) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 Attached Dwelling Units 0.0 0 16.2 648 16.20 648 Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 Hotel/Motel Lodging Units 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 Resort Lodging Units 0.0 0 5.9 235 5.90 235 Commercial/Office Uses 0.0 0 13.1 398,583 13.14 1 398,583 Industrial/Manufacturing Uses 0.0 0 1 0.0 0 0.00 1 0 Sub -total Specific Plan B I F-0.0 ----- 35.20 ----- 35.20 -- -� Spec�f�c Plan A Remavat Detached Dwelling Units (1) Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Dwelling Units (2) Hotel/Motel Lodging Units Resort Lodging Units Commercial/Office Uses Industrial/Manufacturing Uses Sub -total Specific Plan A Deuafoped lrttenslfied/Redevelape Tvta[ Acres : # of. Units Acres:. # of Units. Acres # of `Units 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 0 (121.0) (1,215,000) (121.00) (1,215,000) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.00 0 0.0 ----- (121.00) ---� (121.00) ----- NOTES: (1). Only 34 of the 295 acres are vacant lots. The remaining 261 acres represents acres for the addition of 1,566 detached dwelling units In areas already developed such as a lot split of a larger parcel parcel with an existing detached dwelling units. (2). The Inclusion of one acre of Mobile (or modular) Home Dwelling Units (in parks) is to establish such a fee and does not imply that that the City anticipates such a private proposal. (3). The 35.2 acres is not intended to suggest there Is 35.2 acres of vacant acres in the downtown area. The 35.2 acres is the result of anticipating 648 additional units at roughly 40 units per acre. 110 950 12/17/2018 City of Huntington Beach MASTER FEE AND CHARGES SCHEDULE AND OTHER REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS December 17, 2018 Presented by the Finance Department Budget Balancing Review 2018 Strategic Objective is "to conduct a City Council Study Session on budget balancing options, including looking at current revenue sources, potential new revenue options, and sale of surplus property" Budget Balancing Options Study Session on May 7, 2018 Finance Commission meetings May -July 2018 Finance Commission Study Session on August 6, 2018 2 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: % a— / / / �f 1 hem -33 0? -6 Oq-) 12/17/2018 Summary of Proposed Fee Changes The following revenue adjustments are recommended: Adjust Citywide Master Fee and Charges Schedule $ 269,500 Parking Meter Fee Annualized Rate 600,000 Adjust Fines for Parking Citations 243,000 OTAL PROJECTED REVENUE INCREASE - GENERAL FUND $ 1,112,500 3 Proposed Fee Changes Comparison Certain fees were adjusted with the resulting change in the projected General Fund impact shown below: Adjust Citywide Master Fee and Charges Schedule $ 319,000 $ 269,500 $ (49,500) Parking Meter Fee Annualized Rate 200,000 600,000 400,000 Adjust Fines for Parking Citations 243,000 243, 000 - TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE INCREASE -GENERAL FUND $ 762,000 $ 1,112,500 $ 350,500 4 2 12/17/2018 Community Services History of Parking Meter Rates • Establishes • Sets hourly •Sets rate to •Establishes Pier Plaza rate to $1.50/hour in seasonal parking lot rate $1.50/hour in Business Zone parking rates at $1.50/hour Residential and ! for all meter Recreational ! zones at Zones $1.75/hour c Proposed Fee Changes Comparison by !)Pnartment Community Services Parking Meters$1.SO to$1.75 Parking Meters$1.50 to$2.00 $ 200,000 $ 600,000 $ 400,000 per hour year round vs summer per hour year round, and only remove hourly rates for Parking lots from HBMC Chapter 10 to the Master Fee and Charges Schedule Finance Increase Massage& Implement a phased plan to $ 62,000 $ 12,500 $ (49,500) entertainment permit fees to bring Massage& 10096 cost recovery entertainment permitfeesto 100% cost recovery over a five year period Community Development Not included in November 5, Change Environmental Review Revenue neutral 2018 RCA Fe es from a flat fee to deposit -based structure with actual costs based on a time and materials basis 6 12/17/2018 Proposed MFS Changes by Department Community Services $ 87,000 Finance 65,500 Fire 103,000 Library 10,000 Public Works 4,000 General Fund — Estimated Revenue Increase $ 269,500 Information Services 65,000 All Funds — Estimated Revenue Increase $ _33.4,500 Proposed Master Fee Changes Community Services Summary Community Services Fees and Charges Estimated Revenue Aft- - ALI' Increase Annual Beach Parking Pass $ S,000 Room Rentals 13,000 Specific Events Charges 57,000 Special Events Charges 10,000 Specific Events Application Fee 2,000 Total Estimated General Fund Revenue Increase S 87,000 0 12/17/2018 Community Services Special Events Fees Application Fee All Types $ 110 Day Use Charges Nonprofit $ 375 Commercial/Standard 500 (rate also includes individuals) Modified Day Use Charges Min. Participants (less than 20) No charge Min. Hours/Use (less than 3 hours) $ 325 Daily Set-up/Take Down Charges All Types (flat rate) $ 75 Application Fee All Types $ 110 Day Use Charges HB Nonprofit $ 375 Resident 400 Non HB Nonprofit 425 Nonresident 500 Commercial 550 Modified Day Use Charges Min. Participants (less than 20) No charge Min. Hours/Use (less than 3 hours) $ 325 Daily Set-up/Take Down Charges" HB Nonprofit $ 187 Resident 200 Non HB Nonprofit 212 Nonresident 250 Commercial 275 • Proposed Set-up and Take Down rates are 50% of proposed Day Use rates. Community Services Specific Events Fees Current �091116� Proposed Application Fee Application Fee Under 2,000 estimated attendance $ 200 Under 2,000 estimated attendance $ 225 Over 2,000estimated attendance 400 Over 2,000 estimated attendance 450 Daily Use Charges Daily Use Charges Nonprofit $ 600 HB Nonprofit $ 6S0 Non HB Nonprofit 1,000 Commercial/Standard $ 1,200 Commercial $ 1,350 Daily Set-up/Take Down Charges Daily Set-up/Take Down Charges* All Types No charge HB Nonprofit $ 325 Non HB Nonprofit 500 Commercial 675 *Proposed Set-up and Take Down rates are 50% ofproposed Daily Use rates. 5 12/17/2018 Community Services Parking Meter Rates Current rate is $1.75 per hour during peak season (May 1 through Labor Day), and $1.50 per hour during off- peak season Average hourly rate of $2 per hour during the peak season and $1.75 during the off peak season Ordinance 4148 would remove seasonal changes to parking rate and maintain a $2.00 per hour year-round rate The proposed increase is estimated to generate $600,000 in General Fund revenue annually The rate change would take effect upon adoption of Resolution 2018-55 for off-street lots and 30 days after adoption of Ordinance 4148 for on -street meters. IV Proposed MFS Changes Finance Department Summary Parking Citation Processing and Credit Card Convenience Fee $ 40,000 Utility Customer Setup and Late Fee 13,000 Special Regulatory Business Permits (Entertainment, Fortune Teller, and Massage) 12,500 Total Estimated General Fund Revenue Increase $ 65,500 X 12/17/2018 Finance Department Entertainment Permits Required pursuant to HBMC Chapter 5.44, "Entertainment Permits" Fee includes Finance and Police staff time to complete the following certification process: Business Confirms with applicable zoning requirements Background investigations Issuing printed permits and other official documents Special Business Permits Staff Costs by Department Finance Police Swom Police Nonswom Full Cost Current Fee Proposed Fee Percent Increase 1 Hours $ 1 Noun $ Hours Recovery Entertainment Permit - new l'I $ 197 1 1.50 $ 417 2.00 $ 258 2.50 $ 878 $ 285 $ 402 41.1% Entertainment Permit - renewal 01 $ 1971 L50 $ 417 2.00 $ 258 2.50 $ 878 $ 285 $ 402 41.1% Entertainment Permit- change of Iocationmame N $ 131 1.00 $ 104 0.50 $ 52 0.50 $ 289 $ 149 $ 177 188% Entertainment Pemit-conceptual l'l $ 197 1.50 $ 624 3.00 $ 362 3.50 $ 1,192 $ 485 ' Full cost recovery for thew fees will be phased in over a five-year period. Finance Department Massage Fees Required pursuant to HBMC Chapter 5.24, "Massage Establishments" Fee includes Finance and Police staff time to complete the following certification process: Ensure business is not within 1,000 feet of another massage establishment Background investigations Issuing printed permits and other official documents .. Staff Costs by Department Police Police Finance (SWOm) (Nonswom Full Cost Current Proposed Percent $ Hours S Noun S Hours Recovery Special Business Permits Fee Fee Increase Message Establishment Registration Certificate - initial / add partner $ 329 2.50 g 208 1.00 $ 310 3.00 $ 854 $ 495 $ 565 14.1% Massage Establishment Registration Certificate - renewal . $ 329 2.50 $ 208 1.00 $ 310 3.00 $ 854 5 495 $ 565 14.1% Massage Establishment Registration Certificate -change of IocatioNnamelrem real of partner I'I $ 197 L50 $ 104 0.s0 $ 52 0.50 $ 356 $ 149 $ 190 27.5% ,Massage Independent Registration Certificate -renewal $ 263 2.OD $ 208 1.00 $ 310 3.00 $ 787 $ 115 $ 200 73.9% assap9 pe ent egistration Certificate -charge of locatioNname $ 131 1.00 $ 104 0.50 $ 52 0.50 $ 289 $ - $ 60 N/A Full cost recovery for these fees wilt be phased;, over a five-year period. 7 12/17/2018 Finance Department Entertainment & Massage Fee Survey N. Det<ription R— Anabelm Cortt MMR r9NIItMva" lO @.,R N..""@..h Sip AY Nuntington RearN Enlertalnmtnt P—A(New) -1.00 $311.00 $75.00 5303500-$3,—W Ssta.m-$1.3— $—w s-.. $¢ ❑reume bit EnUrtalnment Ptrmlt (Rtmwal) 5101.00 N/A $675.00 N/A $3]3.00$1,110.00 emferaDle $718.5g N/A; Change of aatlress Enlertalnment PermNGange of ar own s luatbn/Name $-. $31300 N/A N/A waP, Pees N/A N/A EnuNlnment P.—d-Concptual %15.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $02 00.InrUal Mawgt EztabliNmtnt Regetratnn $313 $d,4,M Addl I owner b ffi—t(Inaul/Add Partner) 5%500 $300.m; and Danlner $315.m $9e. $50200 S.U2. M—,1 E—bll—dt Regatratun 1 5-00; In�nal 4rlMutw Renewal $%5.00 53ao.m M..00 557aW0 l0wner $9B W N/A N/A Mteuge EeubliNmtnteg Rshatnn Nb 5315 W, ssye GrtlRule- Gange of frtabbzNment s-Z"Z»1 —.7 baton/name/removal of partner 5190.00 $313.Ob5300.00 Demms N/A rWlrase oY 59g0.D3 N/A Message Indeptndent Rtgimatbn GrliRute-rtnewal lr 5N16C0' 0.e unetl Cebipnn NCas e3Nera Cowwl'ieA $it10.00 as or l/UN119 ]Years" Massage Independent Regbbrttbn CxtMust -Gaof '"I" button/namt l$(A.(p' 0.e uatetl C�Illornia NYxsa eTber CourulD fee: .rossofl 2019 • n trur ass is ees. ev•n in Dnn it •nYsnlna •Dw smm. uilsamn Na.s.ae7envvuunai lcAwrq •nd me �N went Back ro eau •r na rn•i�aussry . Y. ew UNnt r�bnea.m...ara. wwnda'mm..p.�.o�.e«�w<.w.a..rN..•.�.r�,a,t..A,�r...N..�.r...r.•... n... �. on.,.eo.•d�.m.e,rw..r . ......�n•, m•r.�rr.,<�. Proposed MFS Changes Fire Department Summary Fire Department Fee Description Estimated Revenue Increase Valuation Based Fire Inspection and Plan Review Fees $ 10,000 Fire Life Safety Inspections 67,000 State Mandated Inspections 4,500 Special/Specific Events Plan Review and Inspections 5,500 Sand Crab (Resident and Nonresident) 6,000 Marine Safety Truck (1 Person — Marine Safety Officer) 10,000 Total Estimated General Fund Revenue Increase S 103.00 l i 12/17/2018 Fire Department Inspection and Plan Review Fees Proposed fee changes provide a greater percentage of cost recovery for: Fire inspections focused on compliance with the California Fire Code and HBMC Chapter 17.56, "Huntington Beach Fire Code," for proper exiting, hazardous materials, fire sprinklers, etc. Life, safety, and valuation based fire code plan checks and inspections for the community including State mandated high rise buildings and large family day care centers. Fire code plan checks and inspections for Special and Specific Events ensuring life safety for residents and visitors by checking compliance with occupant loads, proper exiting, tents and canopies, etc. The proposed fee increases would bring the average cost recovery for these fees from 60 percent to 82 percent. Fire Department Marine Safety Fees User Fees for Marine Safety recovers the costs for personnel assigned to Special and Specific Events such as the Air Show, U.S. Open, and Surf City Marathon, among others. Covers the cost of Marine Safety Officer and Lifeguard III personnel Paid by the event promoter Marine Safety personnel provide area closures, beach safety and oversight of event area Proposed fee would increase cost recovery for this fee from 54 percent to 60 percent. Junior Lifeguard Sand Crab Program Covers cost of Junior Lifeguard Program Instructors, equipment, supplies and overhead Program introduces children between 6-8 years of age to the ocean environment and prepares them for participation in Junior Lifeguard Program A 12/17/2018 Police Department Parking Citations Staff conducted a review of parking citation rates for 13 nearby cities, including Newport Beach and Fountain Valley Proposed increases will bring citations in line with average Description Current Proposed Street Sweeping $ 44 $ 46 Expired Registraton $ 66 $ 82 72 Hour Violation $ 42 $ 90 Estimated General Fund Revenue Increase $ 243,000 Police Department Parking Citations Survey city Parking Citations Street Sweeping Expired Registration 72 Hour Violation Huntington Beach - Current $ 44 $ 66 $ 42 Huntington Beach - Proposed $ 46 $ 82 $ 9D Anaheim $ 40 $ 193 $ 116 Brea $ 38 $ 76 $ 246 Fountain Valley $ 43 $ 73 $ 33 Fullerton $ 42 N/A $ 125 Garden Grove $ 51 $ 68 $ 108 La Habra N/A 5 138 $ 50 Laguna Beach $ 43 $ 43 $ 43 Manhattan Beach $ 53 $ 89 $ 68 Newport Beach $ 57 $ 100 $ 79 Placentia $ 43 $ 75 $ 47 Seal Beach $ 49 $ 49 $ 114 Stanton $ 41 $ 33 N/A Tustin $ 51 $ 51 $ 51 AVERAGE OFL3CITIESSURVEYED $ 46 $ 82 $ 90 19 20 10 12/17/2018 Community Development Environmental Review Community Development Fees Recommend a deposit with actual costs based on a time and material basis instead of a flat fee Actual cost — no net impact to City revenues Community Development Environmental Review No. Description Notes Current Fee Recommended Fee Level %Cost Recovery Community Developrnent Department PL-42 Environmental Assessment De osit $ 15.751.00 See note 100 % PL-43 Historic Structures De osit [Zl $ 650000 See note 100% PL-44 Environmental Review Focused EA De osit) [1 $ 6,440.00 See note 100 % PL-08 I Environmental Impact Report (Deposit) (7) See note 100 % Current footnote 171 Reco r nd $X Deposit plus consultant depost (TW by consultant) Recommended footnote V De porn with actual costs based on a time and material ITSMI basis PH 11 12/17/2018 Recommended Actions • Adopt Resolution No. 2018-55, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Fees and Charges for Entrance to or Use of City Property, Fee and Charges Collected by the Community Services, Finance, Fire, Information Services, and Public Works Departments, and the Fees for Environmental Review, All as Established Pursuant to Resolution Nos. 2016-59, 2017-46, 2018-01, 2018-29 and 2018-48 which Established A Consolidated Comprehensive Citywide Master Fee and Charges Schedule (Supplemental Fee Resolution No. 7) • Adopt Resolution No. 2018-83, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Adopting An Amended Uniform Bail Schedule for Parking Violations • Approve for Introduction Ordinance No. 4148, An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapters 10.04, 10.52, 10.56, 10.60 and 10.68 and Adding Chapter 10.50 to the Code, Both Relating to On -Street Parking Meter Zones and Off -Street City Parking Lots 12