Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUtilities District 78-1 - Rate Increase for SCE, SC Gas Co, Co Donn L.Wllllame President a ! Electronics Operations 3370 Miraloma Avenue Rockwell Nw" �^ Anaheim,California 92803 (714) 632-4301 International ey April 7, 1976 The Mao lUr �C u D T Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach > S City Hall P.O. Box 190 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CITY COUNCIL OFFICE Dear Council Members: The California Primary Election June 8 may well be one of the most important elections in our statess history because we will be voting on Proposition 75, the Nuclear Power Plants initiative. We at Rockwell International, after careful analysis, believe that its effect would be to prohibit the construction of new nuclear energy plants and close down those which exist. Since California already has serious energy problems, the long-term result would be the halting of new industrial expansion and an exodus of many activities to other states with adequate power resources. The measure borders on the fraudulent since a "Yes" vote for the Nuclear Power Plant initiative is actually a vote for the potential elimination of Nuclear Power from California. Many people are being misled into believing that a "Yes"vote will help them obtain nuclear power. The issue is so serious, in our estimate, that we have initiated a major inhouse effort to gain the support of our 70,000 Orange County employees and their families, relatives and friends to defeat this measure. A t the same time, we are strongly supporting and participating in the work of the "No on 75"Committee in Orange County. l urge you, as a respected opinion-maker in the Orange County community, not only to Vote No on 15 but to make full use of your good offices in encouraging your supporters to join in defeating this dangerous measure. Donn L. Williams t� Southeiv California Edison Company HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 June 17, 1974 City of Huntington Beach P.U. Box 190 Huntington Beach , Ca. 92648 Re: N/S Warner E/O PCH, HR Our Files: E-2537 & E-4086 Gentlemen: Enclosed are Agreements for Extension of Underground )electric Line, for the subject traut.. Please sign and .return all copies of these forms, ncr_inL that a wi-tncss is required for your signature on p?ge 3 of t'ie agreement. This contract descriL-es .the conditions covering the refundable amount of $530.00 and how it will be refunded, " One cony of this c6ntracC will he returned to you when colnpleled by our office. I have also enclosed two invoices, in the amounts of $51. 33 for excess cable (Rule 16) an6 $390.00 for the two marbelite electrolters to be installed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 835-3833. Very truly' yours, ` . L. J. Hargreaves Customer Service Planner LJIi:jh Enr„ 7-2..3 - its N.A.WYCKOFF ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION P. O. BOX 3334• ANAHEIM. CALIF. 92803 Division Manager May 1, 1981 Ms. Alicia Wentworth City Clerk _ 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 �` r Dear Ms. Wentworth: r r- r1 1 l Under Resolution Numbers G-2360 and G-2389, the California Public Utilities Commission authorized Southern .California _ Gas Company to refund certain amounts to its customers relating, primarily, to refunds received-.by the Gas Company from its interstate suppliers. The Gas Company made these refunds during January and February, 1981. Should your City wish to consider refunding the Utility Users' Tax corresponding to these refund amounts, the Gas Company' is willing to assist your. City by passing that tax refund on to eligible city residents through our regular utility bill. However, we are prepared to assist in making utility users' tax refunds only' if the amount of the tax refund is calculated and distributed uniformly. and the Gas Company is expressly authorized to offset the tax refunds .through a credit against current utility users' tax collections. The refund calculations would be based upon the amount of the utility refund and your City's February 1981 Utility Users' Tax rate. If your City agrees to the above approach, please indicate agreement by having the appropriate City official sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided., attaching a Resolution of your City Council formally authorizing this agreement and return to me by June 1, 1981. Cordially, N. R. Wyckoff Division Manager 4 ' 2 - Ms. Alicia Wentworth May 1, 1981 Southern California Gas Company is authorized to proceed with the tax refunds as outlined above and shall be allowed credits against current tax collections of all tax amounts so refunded . It is agreed that the City shall defend and indemnify the Gas Company as to any loss or liability arising from any act or omission by Gas Company in implementing tax refunds on behalf of the City. City. of Huntington Beach Position Date CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Charles Thompson, City Administrator From Alicia M. Wen Porth, City Clerk Subject So. Calif. Gas Co. Letter Date May 5, 1981 Re: Utility Users ' Tax Refund Attached is a letter from Southern California Gas Company regarding refunding of Utility Users' Tax. We informed Mr. Feehan that we would transmit this letter to you for a possible agenda item. If Council concurs, a resolution would be required. AMW:CB:bt CC: Ben Arguello, Chief of Administrative services D 1 � E E D MAY 0 7 1981 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE RCA 80-62 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Submitted by Floyd G. Belsito Department Administration Date Prepared July .2 2 , 19 8 Backup Material Attached o Yes No Subject UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT -78-1 City Administrator's Comments APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 19, . .Approve as recommended... _ CITY CLERK Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE �. .At their meeting of July 17 , 1980 , the Meadowlark Airport Board voted . to request that after the Southern California Edison Company undergrounds its wires , the tops of the poles be cut off .down to the level where the telephone wire_s. are . The Board requested that ,this be done. on Warner Avenue under the take-off pattern and extending to Boisa Chica Street . RECOMMENDATION Request that the utilities investigate the possibility of .reducing .the ,height of the poles .until all the wires are completely undergrounded. ANALYSIS The primary concern of the Board was that the safety of the airport be improved. This was the reason for the formation of the Underground Utility District , and now that completion is delayed for another year , the Board would like to -request that this special effort be made . It is believed that "topping" the poles has been performed in other cities . Attached are the minutes of the Meadowlark Airport Board ' s meeting of July 17 , 1980. ALTERNATIVE ACTION Take no action. FUNDING SOURCE No funds are necessary. P10 3/78 1-5 q... lh.•..l K•1P'.' f Art _ City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX ISO CALIFORNIA 926" OFFICE OF "rHE CITY CLERK 1 L% // � 6, t... December 9, 1975 ' v r 's 1 Southern California Edison Company 8120 Garfield Avenue Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: L. J. Hargreaves Customer Service Planner Gentlemen: Re: Your Uie E-2537 & E-4086 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjo cned regular meeting held December 8, 1975 approved an agreement -elati � to underground electrical service and street lighting fo the War r Avenue Fire Station. We are enclosing, the original and two copies of said agreement duly executed by the City. We would appreciate your forwarding a y of said agreement to our office when executed by your mpany. Very truly yours, o Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk • AMW:CB:tlo Encl. r eii jEro4 the desk of: ��► CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 536-5226 J� City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92OU OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK December 9, 1975 ,�\ Southern California Edison Company 8120 Garfield Avenue 1f� Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: L. J. Hargreaves Customer Service Planner .... . j Gentlemen: Re: Your file E-2537 & E-4086 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjourned regular meeting held December 8, 1975 approved an agreement relating to underground .electrical service and street lighting for the Warner Avenue Fire Station. We are enclosing the original and two copies of said agreement, duly executed by the. City. We -would appreciate your forwarding a copy of said agreement to our office when executed by your company. Very truly yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:tlo Encl. se City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT November 20, 1975 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City. Administrator Subject: Warner Avenue Fire Station, CC-356 Dear Council Members: Transmitted herewith is an agreement requested by the Southern California Edison Company to be executed by the City. The agreement relates to the underground electrical service and street lighting for the Warner Avenue Fire Station. Under utility regulations the City is required to provide at its cost the trenching, excavation, backfill, conduit and an underground vault for the Edison Company' s service. The agreement also states that these facilities provided by the City become the property of the Edison Company. Public Utilities Commission regulations do provide that a maximum of $530. 00 is eli- gible to the City in reimbursement if after a comparison of revenues to cost over the next three years would warrant the reimbursement. As this type of reimbursement is structured for larger commercial or industrial developments, I would expect no reimbursement back to us on this project. It is recommended that your Honorable Body approve the agreement,. authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign, and instruct the Clerk to return the agreement to the Edison Company for their signature. Very truly yours, Hare Director of Public Works HEH:JFM:jy Trans. I T ZONING DM 35 1� TIONAL DISTRICT MAP 30-5-11 ADOMD MARCH 90•1941 NOT(' pTY OF i awn�aer •r w r . - GTY COUNCIL OWDIMAMC[ N0. S24 n• Jael ro.row ee otl'r q cur �r�r��yp ���yy� nr1e010 rn llrl r Ml (lrlrle . ossar,Ira NamsYf. QNO.�. Or WCM.K r pr II•[•MH IOr[ resell rYelr ecrnleu ari4tT TNTINGTON . BEACH .NNE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 0Y ZCK CAN: Vk\ o . 93• Ras R� R2 A4o ..w RI OIl Y RI C4 RI e. F�2 , \ 'pi ti f—J COD 100 A New 3.72 •.C.[.CO. AGREEMENT FOR EXTENSION OF UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TO SERVE NEW COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT (Installation by Developer) THIS AGREEMENT, made this...l.!th...day of .....June 19....4., between SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called "Utility," and.................................................. ...---•.......................Cit....of Huntington Beach . .....-••••.....-••--.....-••••••••-••••-•...••----•.......••...•••....................... .. hereinafter called "Developer," WITNESSETH: .WHEREAS, Developer has requested Utility, pursuant to Utility's Rule No. 15.2;Underground Extensions Within New Commercial and Industrial Development, to furnish and install underground electric distribution lines within a new commercial and/or, industrial development, located in the County of.......Grange State of California, substantially described as follows: N/S Warner Ave. 283' E/0 P,.:.c. Cst. Hwy. , Huntington Beach (Warner Ave. Fire Station) Tract No.......................... recorded in Book-No................;......:., Page No.......................... of Maps, records of said County, and consisting of...One..............lots as shown on the tract or survey map attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, Any required extension of electric lines in excess of 200 feet outside the boundaries of the development will be installed pursuant to Utility's Rule No. 15, Line Extensions; and WHEREAS, Underground service. connections to each applicant from the underground distribution sys- tem will be installed and maintained as provided in Utility's rules applicable thereto; and WHEREAS, Street lighting will be installed in accordance with the appropriate tariff schedule; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the mutual promises and covenants of the parties.hereto, hereinafter contained, it is mutually agreed by and between_ the parties hereto as follows, viz: 1. Developer, at Developer's expense and in accordance with Utility's specifications, all as set forth in Ex- hibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, will perform all necessary trenching, excavating, and backililling, including furnishing of any imported backfill material required, and will furnish and install any conduit and substructures necessary to serve the..development, including reimbursement to Utility of the cost of such necessary conduits and substructures which Utility had previously installed at its own expense in antici- pation of the current extension. Any necessary riser conduit, conduit covering, and miscellaneous riser material required for the supply circuit will be furnished or paid for by Developer and will be installed by Utility. Y 2. Additional facilities, as requested by Utility, are to be installed by Developer in accordance with Util- ity's specifications and timing requirements, as set forth also in Exhibit A, and the estimated installed cost of said additional facilities installed by Developer is agreed to be$...-0.'............................... Upon installation by Developer, acceptance by Utility, and transfer of ownership to Utility of said addi- tional underground facilities, said estimated installed cost of the 'additional facilities will be reimbursed to De- veloper by Utility. 3..Utility will complete at Utility's expense the installation of the underground distribution system within the commercial or industrial development and any portion of the supply circuit which may extend beyond the boundaries of the development to Utility's existing supply facilities that is not in excess of 200 feet, including any circuit needed to bring underground lines up.to existing overhead line level; provided, however, Utility has been granted rights of way therefor satisfactory to and without cost to or condemnation by Utility. Utility will install only those facilities that, in Utility's judgment, will be used within a reasonable time to serve permanent bona fide loads within the development. 4. Said extension of electric distribution lines shall be and remain the property of Utility. The parties hereto do hereby declare that it is their mutual intention that title to and ownership of said portion of the:underground system furnished by the Developer, including any.additional facilities installed by Developer.pursuant to Paragraph 2 hereof; which is to be- owned, maintained; and operated by Utility as provided by Utility's Rules, shall vest in Utility. Developer does hereby agree that immediately upon completion of said facilities and acceptance by Utility, title to each and every component part thereof shall immediately pass to Utility without further action upon the part of Developer.. 5. Developer will provide that degree of supervision over and coordination between grading, trenching,. excavating, and other contractors as required-to assure that Utility's underground facilities remain at the depth below final grade set forth in Utility's specifications,:and as required to prevent damage to .Utility's facilities from the activities of said contractors. Developer agrees 'to hold harmless and indemnify Utility,for any and' all damage to Utility arising in any way from the failure to provide said supervision, including but not limited to damage represented by the cost to Utility of correcting an inadequate trench and/or excavation depth or other known conditions exposing Utility to damage. 6. The amount of $....5.30.00 .. Which is Utility's estimate.of the installed cost of the conduit and other substructures installed and transferred to Utility in accordance with B.I. of Rule No. 15.2, exclusive of ex- cavation, backfilling, and transformer vaults or enclosures designed to accommodate transformers that will sup- ply three-phase service; will be subject to refund in accordance with the following provisions: (a) The billed revenue for. the first 12-month billing period following completion date of the installa- tion (from sales to customers within the development and connected_to the extension) will be compared as a percentage to Utility's estimate of the installed cost of the facilities to be owned by Utility, excluding transfor- mers, meters, services, excavating, and backfiling. This percentage applied to the amount subject to refund_will determine the amount of refund to be paid promptly to Developer without interest, except no refund will be made if revenue is less than 25 percent of cost. (b) Revenues for each of the second and third 12-month billing periods will similarly be compared with said estimated installed cost and additional refunds made if and to the extent the total refund then due exceeds the amount already refunded. CBO 190 A y r , (c) No payment will be made by Utility in excess of the amount subject to refund, nor after the final refund based on the third 12-month billing period following the completion date which is the date Utility is first ready to render service from the extension. 7. In event Developer-installed facilities to be transferred to Utility are not as set forth in Exhibit A,but are acceptable to Utility, Utility retains the right to revise Utility's estimate of installed costs set forth herein, or enter into a new agreement for said extension of underground electric line. 8. This contract is subject to the Rules of Utility. 9. This contract shall at all times be subject to such changes or modifications by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California as said Commission may, from time to time, direct in the exercise of its jurisdiction. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written. DEVELOPER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Name............Cit)r of Juntington B_e_ach-------------- By.........................................................--- --- - - District Manager By. --------- . ... .---- . Norma -Brandel Gibbs Huntington Beach ••-•------...... ---•-----------------------------------•--- Title...............•........----•---------Mayor..........-----------------------. District Address........P.O. Box 190 ---•-------- ------------------------------------- Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 ....................................................... Witnesr- ATTEST: .............................................................................................. City Clerk Address qlty.of_-Huntington BeacYL ................. .........:-•-•.............................•---------........--------------------------....... 6433-2537, E-2537 W.O. No....................................•------...._........------------------..-- Date Utility First Ready to Serve............................................................. 19......... APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P.. BONFA City ney COD 190 A REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION RCA 8 0-0.4 - Submitted by Floyd G. Belsito Department Administration Date Prepared January 10 , ,,19 8 0 Backup Material Attached Q Yes No Subject APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR RATE INCREASE City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended DN ` � f < /a j� of Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue At the meeting of. January 7 , 1980 , Council directed that a resolution be prepared opposing a rate increase for the Southern California Gas Company. i Recommendation: Approve the attached resolution. Analysis The resolution states that the City opposes such application for increase of rates on behalf of the City and its residents . It directs that copies be sent to the Public UtilitiesCommission as well as the Southern Calif- "or.nia Gas Company. Funding Source : NoJunds are necessary. Alternative : Take no position. Plo 3/78 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE 171X STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of ) APPLICATION SOUTHERN CALI'FORNIA GAS COMPANY for ) Authority to Increase Rates Charged ) NO. 59316 By It for Gas Service. ) NOTICE OF FILING OF APPLICATION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (Applicant) hereby gives notice that an application was filed with the California Public Utilities Commission on December 10 , 1979 , requesting authorization of the Commission to increase its gas rates to cover significant increases in the cost of doing business. In Application No. 59316 , Applicant requests a general rate increase of $178 . 9 million, or about 8 . 5 percent over current rates , based upon Test Year 1981 . If the full request is approved, a typical residential bill would increase about 12 cents per day, or $3::50 per month beginning in 1981 . The proposed increase is needed to offset the increasing cost of labor and materials , including the impact of inflation; to support substantially expanded conservation activities; and to provide the necessary earnings level to maintain the financial integrity of the Applicant, so it can compete successfully for - 2 - monies it must. raise to provide the facilities to serve its customers. Included in this request are proposals for allocating the increase among the various: customer classes. Any party interested in the .above application and related exhibits will be furnished with a copy thereof upon written request made to: Jonel C. Hill., Vice President Regulatory Affairs Southern California Gas Company P. 0. Box 3249, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90051 This notice is given in accordance with the requirements of Rule 24 of the Commission' s Rules of Practice and Procedure. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY By DAVID B. F LLETT Its Attorney REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION RCA s o-0 3 Submitted by Floyd G. Belsito Department Administration Date Prepared January 10 , , 19 80 Backup Material Attached ® Yes R No Subject APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR '.RATE INCREASE City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended Dies 74 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: Statement of Issue: At the meeting of January 7 , 1980 , Council directed that a resolution be prepared opposing a rate increase for the Southern California Edison Company. Recommendation: Approve the attached resolution. Analysis : The resolution states that the City opposes such application for increase of rates on behalf of the City and its residents . It directs that copies be sent to the Public Utilities Commission as well as the Southern Calif- ornia Edison Company. Funding Source : No funds are necessary. Alternative : Take no position. Plo 3178 .' s - V-S ECE. HE � D E i i979 CITY OF H��UTTN��TppII�NG►ON BEACH BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF��1�A7,'I &WIFAF rr In the Matter of the Application of ) /�o SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ) Application No. 5935I for authority to increase rates ) (NOI No. 9) charged by it for electric service. ) NOTICE OF FILING APPLICATION FOR RATE INCREASE AND OF HEARING THEREON NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to Rule 24 of the Commission' s Rules of Practice and Procedure and Commission direction that Southern California Edison Company on or about December 26, 1979 will file an application with the California Public Utilities Commission for general increases in rates charged by it for electric service. Said increased rates as compared with present rates are estimated to result in a total increase in revenue of approximately $340 million or 9. 0% based on 1981 level of sales under average-year conditions. The Application sets forth the need for increased revenues due to continuing cost increases and the inadequacy of earnings, -under- existing rates, to enable Applicant to finance construction of needed additional utility plant on reasonable terms. As shown in the Application, the spread of the revenue increases among the several classes of service for which increased rates are sought is: 1981 Annual Average Revenue Percentage Customer Group Increase Increase* $M % Domestic $153,303 1.3.3 Lighting and Small Power 89,962 10.4 Large Power 28,749- 9.6 Time-of-Use 43,923 3.5 Agricultural and Pumping 14,582 11.6 Street Lighting 9,664 17.2 $340,183 9.0% *Calculated for each customer group by dividing the estimated increase in revenues by the total estimated revenues under presently authorized rates, including the effect of the application of the energy cost adjustment procedure, and stating the result as a percentage. The increase in rates requested by said application is necessitated by the effects on Applicant' s operating costs of continued inflation, additions to rate base and increased cost-of-capital above that reflected in presently effective rates, together with the need for an attrition allowance to afford Applicant the opportunity to earn the return deemed appropriate by the Commission for the entire interval between general rate adjustments (two years) under the Commission' s regulatory lag plan. A copy of said Application and related exhibits will be furnished by Applicant upon written request to the undersigned directed to the Applicant at 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, California. Inquiries concerning the proposed increases may be directed to and a copy of said Application and related exhibits may be examined at the offices of the' California Public Utilities Commission as follows: California Public Utilities Commission State Building 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102 California Public Utilities Commission State Office Building 107 South Broadway Los Angeles, California 90012 and at the following offices of the Applicant: 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 100 Long Beach Boulevard ,Long Beach, California 93277 601 West Civic Center Drive Santa Ana, California 92701 118 East Carrillo Street Santa Barbara, California 93101 1700 E. Tahquitz-McCallum_ Way Palm Springs, California 92262 275 "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92401 FURTHER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California has set the hearings in the above-entitled matter for public witness testimonv before Administrative Law Judge Haley as follows: Visalia - Thursday, February 14, 1980 at 10 :00 a.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 707 West Acequia Street. Long Beach - Wednesday, February 20, 1980 at 10:00 a.m. in the Long Beach Main Library, 101 .Pacific Avenue. Santa Ana - Thursday, February 21, 1980 at 10:00 a.m. in the City Council Chambers Conference Room, 22 Civic. Center Plaza. Los Angeles - Friday, February 22, 1980 at 10:00 a.m. in tt.e Commission Courtroom, State Office Building, 107 South Broadway. -2- Palm Springs - Tuesday, February 26, 1980 at 10: 30 in the Federal Savings and Loan Building, 300 South Palm Canyon Drive. San Bernardino - Wednesday, February 27, 1980 at 10 :00 a.m. in the State Building Auditorium, 303 West 3rd Street. Santa Barbara - Wednesday,. March 5, 1980 at 10:00 a.m.' in the Administrative Building, Board of . Supervisor's Conference Room, 105 E. Anapamu. and has directed that we notify our customers of the time and place of hearings so that they may .appear and be heard should they so desire. Further hearing dates will be scheduled. Information concerning the time and place of such further hearings can be obtained from the Commission or from the Company at the respective addresses set forth. Dated at Rosemead, California, this 26th day of December, 1979. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY By . EDWARD A. MYERS, JR. Vice President -3- BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application ) of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ) Application No. 58764 for Authority to Modify its Energy ) (Reopened) Cost Adjustment Clause to Increase ) f its Energy Cost Adjustment Billing ). _ S Factors ;Vll ) f pr NOTICE OF alp REOPENED HEARING TO CONSIDER MODIFICATION OF DECISION NO. 90967 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the California Public Utilities Commission has set hearings in the above-entitled matter before Administrative Law Judge- Orville Wright for Thursday, January 17 , 1980, at 10:00 a.m. in the Commission Courtroom, State Office Building, 107 South Broadway, Los Angeles, California, at which time applicant and all interested parties may appear and be heard. Applicant filed its Petition to Reopen and Modify Decision No. 90967 in Application No. 58764 on December 21, 1979. Applicant has requested that such Decision be modified to allow amortization of the accumulated balance in applicant's Energy Cost Adjustment Clause ("ECAC") balancing account over a six-month period ending April, 1980. The effect of such request will be to increase retail revenues by about $81 million during the period of February 1, 1980, to May 1, 1980. ECAC billing factor increases which would result from this proposed modification effective February 1, 1980, are as follows : Lifeline: from 1.6580/kWh to 2.1680/kWh Non-Lifeline Domestic: from 3.4530/kWh to 4.2190/kWh Other than Domestic: from 3.2970/kWh to 3.9150/kWh Applicant has requested such modification in order to allevi- ate serious cash flow and financing problems in 1980 anticipated by applicant under present rate levels pICE0VE D JAN 0 81980 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ' I A copy of this petition and related exhibits will be furnished by Edison upon written request to the undersigned directed to Edison at 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, California 91770. Dated at Rosemead, California, : this 4th day of January, 1.980. SOUTHERN FORNIA EDISON COMPANY By EDWARD A. MYERS, JR. Vice President r , Jan 20 1972 Southern California Edison Co. P.O.Box 2691 dNMO IA3ION ONLY Long Beach., Calif. 90801 ' xLY�!_E ' TO COUNCIL: Dear Sirs: I am writing in regards to the high cost of utilities. I note with much interest that your company is requesting an increase in rates i think t that vie have already had a sufficient increase in rates as you will note from the schedule below. Date of bile 111M Cost Jan 1971 (Serv. from Nov to Jan ?) 1656 33•84 �. Mar. 1607 33.16 May 1352 29.59 J July 1441 30.83 Sept 1325 32.73 Nov 1.60o 37 a 78 Jan 1972 (nov to Jan 7) 1931 44.81 First of all please note the difference in KW Jan 171-1656 - Jan "72 1931. We still have the same appliances and put up less outside Lights this Christmas to conserve electricity. 14hy the big difference? Tote Jan 1971 1656 Y,.14 cost 33.84. Nov 1971 1600 D1 cost 37.78. Mr. Harrell has not received a raise because of the wage freeze# yet the cost of utilities has increased. We are also very disturbed about the mess under the utilities towers on Hamilton Ave and Magnolia.. Certainly with the raise in the utility rates lash., year your company can atleast beautify the right of way and hoer up the weeds and brush and plant some seed and make it more pleasant to the eyes of the people In this area;. The blight is a disgrace to our community. Verytruly yours.. �1 Copy» Public Utilities Comm. Mrs. Josephine L Harrell I Assemblyman Robert Burke 9091 Bobbie Cr,. Huntington Beach Council , . Huntington Beach members. f PS I talked to many of nW neighbors and they fell the same. P.S. 2 f M E M O R A N D U M APPROVED BY CITY COUivCi . ---........................ ---1_���2./... TO : Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Doyle Miller , City Administrator cis t cL�Ris DATE : March 9 , 1971 Present Southern California Edison Company plans include the addition of generating Units 2 and 3 at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. In order to supply the present distribution system they will be building a 220 KV trans- mission line from the San Onofre plant to tie in to several existing substations . Current planning (see attached map) include a line through Santa Ana on Talbert Avenue, thence paralleling the inland side of the Santa Ana River to their substation at the intersection of Garfield and the Santa Ana River , which is the extreme northeast corner of the City of Huntington Beach. This installation will require the construction of two new, streamlined metal poles in the substation. Of the entire project , these two poles will be the only construc- tion scheduled within the City of Huntington Beach. These poles will be the same as those currently used at the Houston Astrodome . The California Public Utilities Commission will require a written statement from the City concerning this proposed two pole construction. Inasmuch as this proposed construction only involves a few hundred feet within the extreme northeast corner of our city and since it will further help alleviate future power shortages in our community, it is the Administrator ' s recommendation that the Council approve and order the Adminis - trator to prepare the written statement . 4 oyl miller City Administrator DM:bwo Southern California Edison Company P. O. BOX 111 : HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 99648 - P. W. RICHARDSON �,{,, (, DISTRICT MANAGER March 4. 19 7 1 Mr. Doyle Miller, Administrative Officer City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Miller: On March 4, 1971, Mr. R. P. Burbank and I met with you and Floyd Belsito to discuss the Southern California Edison Company's plans for construction of a 220 KV transmission line between Edison's Santiago Substation, located north of the San Diego Freeway and west of the Laguna Freeway, and Ellis Substation, located south of Ellis Avenue on the west bank of the Santa Ana River in Huntington Beach. This line will tie into our existing 220 KV transmission system at our Ellis Substation. In order to make the tie it will be necessary to in- stall two towers on substation property. These towers will be the only structures associated with this line to be located in the City of Hunt- ington Beach. Construction of this line is scheduled to start about July 1972, and will be completed by October 1973. Pursuant to the provisions of California Public Utilities Commission General Order 131, Edison plans to file an application on or about March 1, 1971, for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity covering the proposed new construction. The new lines are required in connection with the addition of Units 2 and 3 at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. These lines will provide a portion of the additional 220 KV transmission capacity which will be needed to transmit Edison's share of these new generating units (approximately 1800 1,114) from San Onofre to Edison's main 220 KV transmission system. In accordance with the provisions of General Order 131, Edison hereby re- quests a written statement setting forth your position concerning those portions of the proposed construction situated within the city limits of Huntington Beach. We will be pleased to meet with you or your staff as required to supply any additional information, or to answer any questions you may have concerning these plans. Very truly yours, A-5 W. P. W. Richardson RPB:imr V-1 I �J — -- ---y-- TO,TOrf4111,9 ELr ��/Atiw3�6� tc&c.L �I Cary (in�h�lary ,J� �' ! /Z