The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAssessment District 7301 - Townlot Assessment District - Aba 1 a City of Huntington Beach P.Q. BOX too CALWOMA 9=0 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK April 22, 1975 F. Mackenzie Brown, Attorney at Law 4630 Campus Drive, Suite 101 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Mr. Brown: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, April 21, 1975 approved the Special Counsel Agreement for Assessment Districts 7201 (Sunset Heights) 7301 (Townlot) and 7302 (Old Town Drainage) and adopted Resolution No. 4064 approving Special Counsel Agreement. We are enclosing three copies of the agreement for your signature and " _� return to this office. A duly executed copy of the agreement and res- olution will be forwarded to you for your files. Sincerely yours, ter Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:cb enc. 3 1 F. MACKENZIE BROWN (714) 979-4930 4630 CAMPUS DRIVE,SUITE 101 NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92660 (213) 489-5006 458 SOUTH SPRING STREET. SUITE 809 LOB ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90013 'April 11, 1975 Mr. William Hartge, Director Engineering & Public Works City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California Re: City of Huntington Beach Dear Bill: Enclosed herein find the following: 1. Special Counsel Agreement 2 . Resolution Approving Special Counsel Agreement Upon your review, if the Agreement is acceptable, please have it submitted to the City Council for consideration. Note that it is only applicable to the proceedings previously under contract by Mr. John Ganahl, and further, it should be noted that this contract will now supersede and amend the prior employment resolutions of the City Council and, pursuant to said Agreement, we will take care of all payments due or accruing to the estate of Mr. Ganahl. A further modification and reduction in fee was made if the proceedings as contemplated, will be conducted pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915. " If not, our decision was to merely work under the existing Resolution of Employment, previously approved by the City Council. As for future proceedings, I would be very happy to discuss those with you some time at your convenience. Thank you. Very ly yours , v F. Mackenzie Brown FMB/j Enclosures 3 .r SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1975, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter called "Agency") and JOHN GANAHL III and F. MACKENZIE BROWN, attorneys at law (herein- after called "Counsel") WHEREAS , this City Council did by resolution, previously employ John T. Ganahl, attorney at law, now deceased,_._to act as special counsel_ for the purpose of conducting and carrying through to completion, certain proceedings, to be pursuant to either the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913', " or the "Improvement Act of 1911, " said assessment districts covered by said Resolution of Employ- ment are as follows : Assessment District No. 7201 Assessment District No. 7301 Assessment District No. 7302 WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to have said proceedings carried through to completion and is further desirous to employ counsel as above set forth for said purpose. W I T N E S S E T H: IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED between the parties hereto that: SECTION 1. Counsel shall perform all legal services in con- nection with the following listed assessment districts for proceedings conducted either pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 , " being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code or the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of said Code, pursuant to all the terms and conditions as set forth previously by resolution of the City Council with Mr. John T. Ganahl of Ganahl & Ganahl, relating to proceedings as set forth as follows: Assessment District No. 7201 Assessment District No. 7301 Assessment District No. 7302 SECTION 2 . Should said proceedings be financed through bonds to issue pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 , " being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code, said fee may be reduced to the following particulars : two percent (2%) of the first Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500 , 000. 00) of the actual cost of construction and one percent (1%) of the balance thereof, exclusive of costs of incidental expenses . SECTION 3 . All other terms and conditions as previously re- lated to said proceedings are incorporated herein and it is further mutually agreed that, by the approval of this agreement, all costs or fees due or payable to Mr. John T. Ganahl will be paid by Counsel, as. above set forth. SECTION 4 . This Agreement may be terminated by either party hereto by mailing written notice thereof to the other party. SECTION 5. The above legal fees are all chargeable as inci- dental expenses to completed proceedings and thus are not a direct obligation of the Agency. SECTION 6 . Said services shall include the following: (a) Review of the dedication and acquisition of the streets and easements or other property in which_ proposed work is to be located. r r (b) Examination of the plans and specifications for the proposed work, the boundary map and assessment diagram of the assessment district, the assessment roll and diagram, bonds , and the giving of instruc- tions and advice in connection with the foregoing. (c) Recommendations as to procedure and actions that should be conducted. (d) Preparation of all resolutions, notices, contracts , bond forms , and other papers and documents required in the proceedings. (e) Examination of the proceedings, step by step, as taken. (f) Appear at all hearings under the proceedings and attend any meeting where attendance is requested. (g) Issuance of an unqualified legal opinion attesting to the validity of the proceedings and the issuance of the bonds. AGENCY ATTEST: MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON. BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY CLERK OF THE ,CITY-'-OF-" HUNTINGTON �$EACH, CALIFORNIA COUNSEL JOHN GANAHL III ,APPROVED AS TO FORM: F. MACKENZ IE BROWN DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY=.. BY: eptity Ci y Atto - -2- Affidav'* of Publication - --- - Published.Huntington Beach News.April 24, May 1, 1975. State of California ) NOTICE OF HEARING County of Orange } ss CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, City of Huntington Beach 1 CALIFORNIA 't,t y ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. "" 5;<NOTICE I,S HEREBY GIVEN, that an the I That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach 21st day of April, 1975, the City Council News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal- lished in Huntington Beach California and circulated in the said forma, approved and adopted a Resolu- g � lion providing fora hearing,as set forth County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination in Section 17 of Article xnl of the Con- of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide stitution of the State:of California. subscription list of paying 'subscribers, and said paper has been NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, established, printed and published in the State of California, and that the City Council of the City of Hun- County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication day of Beach, California, t the 21n- of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not day of April; 1975, did adopt a Plat 301 titled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any (TOwNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT)" particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or showing the general nature, location and any number thereof. extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements in- The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper cluding street and landscaping improve- of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court ments as well as necessary acquisitions, of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map showing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That the NOTICE OF HEARING That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntingtop Beach did adopt i a Resolution Covering Preliminary, De- r,C n 10" termination that the public convenience to 5uF 7 'I�p+NT �1 a (T IGT tv0 '��n1 and necessity require the construction of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- of certain street improvements and land- sca,ping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurten-i paper at least two I S S Ue S antes and appurtenant work within they City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to commencing from the 2��ih day of AT)r11 be assessed against lands to be bene-, fited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN,i 1975— and ending on the 18 t day of May that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975, at the hour of 7:00 PM o'clock in the, Council Chambers of the City Council of 19 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and the City of Huntington Beach, located at times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,' regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a I fixed or is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the pub- supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following lic convenience and necessity for the dates, to-wit: above mentioned and referenced im- provement and acquisition without com- pliance with the "Special Assessment. Anr- 24, May 1 � 1975 1Investigation, Limitation and Majority 'Protest Act of 1931." Any persons"interested in, or owning„ property within the district proposed to'' be assessed to pay the cost and expenses, thereof, may file with the City Clerk,' prior to the time fixed for hearing, writ-, 17 Publisher ten protests or objections to the under-! taking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Spe-� Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2nd day of cial Assessment Investigation, Limitation{ and Majority Protest Act of 1931." All protests or objections shall contain a' ��y 19— description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the Notary Public signature of the interested person or I 2iv1't-,,»r owner. Orange County, California The improvements and work shall be conducted under thw provisions of the 7 f State oft Act of 191T' way,s_i6d-e of "Improvement �_ --� "Streets and Highways C,`ode of - THOMAS D. WYLLIE r California and bonds wilt also be.issued pursuant to the provisions Notary Public-California r of said''Act. t eu Orange County Reference is hereby made to Resolution r No. 4067 and to the plat and 'map on tVly Commission Expires 11 al_-The-ticula nu-.�_>_aa o•^� am^ i _______ � file in the office of the CityClerk for September 12, i978 of the works of✓improvement proposed to be constructed under these proceed-I ings: A. The construction of certain street im- provements including necessary remov- al, and .the installation of curbs, gut- ters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, paving, street lights, drainage struc- tures, ornamental vegetation and irri- gation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and ap- purtenant work including all intersec- tion work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest.Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of.•center line,, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Golden- west Street to Seventeenth' Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Or- ange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seventeenth Street. PE- CAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWEN- TIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to I Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. T'NENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. B. The construction of certain alley im- provements including grading, paving, underground communication and tele- phone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418; 419, 420, 421, 422, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522. 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, and 622, all of the Huntington Beach Tract Seven- teenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seven- tee r h Street on the east, Goldenwest Strut on the west. Further, said pro- ject shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improve- ments and for further particulars, ref- erence is hereby made to the map at- tached hereto showing the general na- ture, location and extent of the pro- posed works of improvement. DATED: April 22, 1975. ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach; California City of Hui :igton Beach County of Orange State of California Affidavit o f Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher 'Huntington Beach News Filed Clerk By. Deputy Clerk UCEIVED NOTICE OF HEARING JX/2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA GAS gii 9 : 0 6 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 2 ( rOVINLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS ILERE13Y GIVEN, that on t.he 21st day of Aeril 19 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for . a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of -Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington ,;each did adopt- a Resolution Cove.ring. Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscapingincluding street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington. Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of- the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above menti.oned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act' of 1931 . " Any persons interested in, or owning , property within the district proposed to be ass.es.sed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , - Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests. or objections shall contain a description of -the property, the nature of the Protest or objection, and bear- the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of, the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California and. bonds will a 1.s b c 1 o the provisions of said Act. o , issued pursuant L Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the Plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars. The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these proceedings : A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks , driveway approaches , paving, street lights , drainage structures , ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services , together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities -and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517, 518 , 519 , 520, 521. , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , .620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition , if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: 3� j APPROAD O1$ Ta MM.- d6� V. i 69f?A nn CLERK H CITY OF dray Attorney HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By Deputy City Attorney gdxwAwelt I iil i - I � f7 ___.._�.L__ -_ __ _ --�_ .._ A -- TT`iTT7T 22nd 1111.L'l .f!11!!.!lll !1:hlLill _ r� T 1T 1 j I I I I I � I i t I II i IF I I TITIT;I n F717 'frff -f'TT1T: I s 21rt ® _ A� JJLl_L1111 iL U I rn 0 Z fA O19th 1.11.1W1!'L;_L 111L 11 llllllll �1 III ILIlili1ll_IRI , � I I I ► I I I ! III I it -r I I i II I I I I I til. L--� 181h fT1Tll1 nT1TTTTT f1 iTTIT __ ___ vth HUNTINGTON BEACH eWANY 'NtINGTON BEACH COMPANY HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY 1 M S MAIN STREET 0 MAIN STREET TAX' ,')Illl at cm 2110 225 BUSH STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 SAN FRANCISCO$ CA. 94120 23-112-d 23-112-05 23-112-o6 PETERSEN*. JOHN L. HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY 610 22No STREET 2110 MAIN STREET 2110 MAIN STREET 4Uiff4NGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-112-09 23-112-10 23-113-02 AUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY FIELOSt DOROTHY Z. 2110 MAIN STREET 2110 MAIM STREET 923 12TH STREET APT. 4* AUNTINGToN BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 SANTA MONICA, CA. 90403 NICKSTROMt LLOYD A. 23-113-03 ADAMS, HAROLD R. 23-113-04 LINDBORG, LEONARD 0.23-11�3-05 518 21ST STREET 614 21sT STREET 112 18TH STREET qUNTINGToN BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-113-06 23-113-08 23-113-09 JRBAN RECONSTRUCTION CORP. GREEN, GEORGE A. JR. JONES9 CLYDE E. JR. 3750 SOUTH SEPULVEDA BLVD. 9432 BEVAN AvENUE 10241 JENNRICH AVENUE -os ANGELES9 CA. 90045 WESTMINSTER, CA. 92683 GARDEN GROVE, CA. 92643 23-113-10 23-113-11 23-113-13 JOHNSON9 THOMAS K. MARLAR, KATHRYN J. CONNOR, ROBERT E. SR. 5109 20TH STREET APT. A 621 207m STREET 0—molp9h. 6,1s at, (021 iUNTINGToN BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-113-14 23-113-15 23-114-02 3RYANTt GLADYS H. BRYANT, GLADYS H. DENSLOWt HUSTON ET AL )139 NORTH FAUST AVENUE 6139 NORTH FAUST AVENUE - 324 NORTH AUBURN .AKEWOOOt CA. 90713 LAKEWOOD, CA. 90713 SIERRA MADRE, CA. 91024 23-114-03 23-114-04 23-114-08 �UNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY GOERGENS, EVELYN BAUMAN, MARY J. 110 MAIN STREET 350 LOMA VERDE AVENUE % KROG, MARY J. UNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 PALO ALTO, CA. 94306 1051 EAST TuJUNGA BURBANK, CA. 91501 23-114-09 23-114-10 23-114-11 RNOLD, DOROTHY E. GARSON, GEORGE A. HEYING, DOROTHY 11 ARIANA CIRCLE 1706 RALSTON 601 19TH STREET UNTINGToto BEACH, CA. 92648 BELMONT, CA. 94002 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-114-12 23-114-13 23-115-03 OADES, RAYMOND W. JR. MALILAY, LARRY I. HUNTINGTON BEACH COMPANY 03 11TH STREET APT. B 619 19TH STREET 2110 MAIN STREET UNTINGTo!4 BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-115-04 23-115-05 23-115-11 UNT, DoNALIE J. TUNSTALL, IOLA D. ET AL TUNSTALL, JAMES W. ET AL 055 KEYSTONE % TUNSTALL, MICHAEL 8160 DARTMOOR DROVE URBANK, CA. 91504 151 MARGATE DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACHt CA. 92646 Ao.o.uva" r. 09An< arm ; II,CHOLS; ,H. L. ET.,,eX ' ' TIGER, STEvrN �. ZEHNDER, LOWELL Da ET AL 1292, LOcH LoMANo ROAD <7b308 Avon AVENUE 17172 SANTA 1sABEL STREET .O$_ALAMITOS, CA. 90720 TORRANCE, CA. 90504 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA. 92708 , 23-1 3-03 23-123-04 23-123-05 ORLEY, MICHAEL F. CORLEY, MIrHAEL F. LINOBORG-:HUI,-ONE PARTNERSHIP- :,,.WkITE SAILS WAY 1020 WHITE SAILS WAY 112 18TH STREET 00 OR©NA_DEL MAR, CA. 92625 CORONA DEL MAR, CA. 92625 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 �3-123-06 d 23-123-08 23-12)-09 ERETH, URSULA M. ET AL GIPE, HUGH P. ET Ux HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL COMPANY A i.a r ,LJ02 xis ST' { 461 SOLVCRA AVENUE 3530 LONG BEACH BLVD.-SURE 102 UNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 ALONG BEACH, CA. 90803 LONG BEACH, CA. 90807 23-123-10 I 23-123-11 23-123-12 INDBORG-HUf'-ONE PARTNERSHIP . ALLEN, LOwELL T. ET Ux WEIR, DONALD A. WEIR ET Uk 12 18TH STREET 115926 MAIOSTONE 401 20TH STREET JNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 lFoUNTAIN VALLEY, CA. 92708 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA*' 23-124-01 23-124-02 23-124�-03 DINAK, RUSSELL M. ' BAGSTAD, ELDON W.. WELLMEN, PHILLIP M. ET AL° "0. Box 8625 901 CATALINA AVENUE .212 PRESTWICK CIRCLE 3UN``PAIN VALLEY, CA. 92708 ! SEAL BEACH, CA. 90740 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, Ca. 92648 23-124-04 j z3-1z4-o5 23-124-o6 �GSTAO, ELDON W. rl,HOVVE, C.D. " HOWE, C. D. )1 CATALINA AVENUE 2863 WALNUT AVENUE ; 2863 WALNUT AVENUE :AL BEACH, CA. 90740 LONG BEACH, CA. 90806 LONG BEACH, CA. 90806 ` i 23-124-09 23-124-10 3-124-11. 'ARD, THOMAS P. LINDBORG, LEONARD 0. HOWE, C. D. 6741 SUMMER CLOUD LANE 1112 18TH STREET 2863 WALNUT AVENUE UNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92647 iHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. LONG BEACH, CA. 90806 23-124-13 ; 23-124-14 23-141-02 RIGER, STEVEN J. FINER, RoeERT D. HARDESTY, FRANCIS L. 19 19TH STREET 423 19TH STREET P. 0. Box 678 UNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92646 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON" BEACH, CA. 92648 r 23-141-03 23-141-o4 ! 23-141-05 ERICH, THOMAS J. MC COY, FREDERICK M. FENTON, JAMES M. i21 ORANGE GROVE AVENUE ; 21031 LOCHLEA LANE 612 19TH STREET .LHAMBRA, *CA. 91803 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 I i 23-141-06 ! FREED, FRANCES ET AL 23-141-07 23-141-08 :LARK, MoOHAEL W. i.% SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK : LOCKYER, L.YNN H. 1303 HARBOR BLVD. - SUITE H5 , TAX DIVISION # 02-1-01396-0/28 221 11TH STREET :OSTA MESA' CA. 92626 ' P.O. Box 2253-TERMINAL ANNEX HUNTINGTON BEACHy CA. 92648 Los ANGELES, CA. 90051 23-141-11 23-141-12 23-141-13 iTRONG, VERNE E. jFULTON, CHARLOTTE E. HUSKINS, .JOE E.- 167-B AVENIDA SEVILLA 839 14TH STREET 855 EL DORADO DRIVE .AGUNA HILLS$ CA. 92653 : HUNTINGTON REACH, CA. 92646 FULLERTON, CA. 92632 F I,'T T ux �DWAROS, CARLENE E. 9 ma R POqNT ell,I �W, ml t. I m 1_. 2 2 18TH STREET Ur,,lTlNGT-,)N BEACH,, CA. 926 74 48 HI- A"", ( A. 1-jLjt-4Tfl %lGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 2 3-114 2-05 2 3-14 0 4 23-142-06 4. J. FAAS & SONS A. J. f.AAS & yrj, PAX SON, WILLIAm R., bo Oi Box 892 , P, (). Pox 8W ll:) 9TH STREET C61 I k�" _0. 8 ' )? VA'JL, Cni-n. HUNT tNGTON BEACH, l A. 92648 ?1-142-07 23-1142-08 23-142-09: Ac, DANIEL,-Ross- P. it-T ux MC DANIEL, Ross P. ET UX CLEMENT, MILDRED M.10 18TH 61 C; 18TH STREET 606 18TH STREET Y • 'U'fitj`N'Giohl BEACHi ,CA. 92648; HUNTINCTON BEACH, CA. 92648 jHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648- 23--'"142----1 b 23-142-11 23 ' JEDINAK, RUSSELL M* MONTGOMERYI, DAMES D. GOETSCH, ELMER E. ET AL 504 AQ*w-ExaLez, #*4-% ST I P. 0. Box 22145 12-06 PARK STREET AUNTINGTON* BEACH,* CA. 926148 HUNTONGTON BEACH, CA. 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-142-14 23-142-15 1 23-142-1- 30ETSCH, ELMER E,, ET AL ROBINSON, HARRY GALKfN, JOHN A. 1206 PARK STREET P, 0. Box 66 101 HuNTfNGTON STREET CA. HUNTINGTON BEACH,, CA. 920�8 T I NGToN BEACH.,- 9,2 64 8. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 • 2�-142-17 1 23-145-01 93-145-03 TEXACO INC. MAUK, THOMAS KIRK STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3350 WILSHIRE B6ULEVARO 11528 SOUTH SHOEMAKER AVENUE % MANN, MELVIN Ho Los ANGELES. CA. 90010 WHITTIER, CA. . 90605 2346 EAST LIVE OAK DRIVE Los ANGELES, CA. 90028 - ----------- 23�145-04 23-145-05 23-145-o6 SIPPLE9 RICHMOND Ce I GIPPLE, RICHMOND C. URBAN RECONSTRUCTION CORO. 1,3919 STRURCKMAN ROAD I % WILSON9 MICHAEL J,, I 8750 SOUTH SEPULVEDA BLVP',, CERRITOS, PA. 90701 13919 STRU4CKMAN ROAD I Los ANGELES, CA. 90045. CERRITOS,) CA. 90701 23-145-07 j 23-145-08 23-145-09 KOHNE, MICHAEL KNICKREHM, ROBERT W. HARREL'L, *ETHEL L. 8163 CAROI --F DRIVE . j 8209 LINDEN CIRCLE 350 CEDAR AVENUE ST ANTONt CA. 90680 BUENA PARK, CA. 90620 , LONG BEACH, CA. 90812 23-145-10 23-145-11 23-145-12 HARRELL, ETHEL L. ' ' NELSON, EMERSON W. JR. HOEFFLIGERI, MELVIN J. 350 CEDAR AVENUE , 513 18TH STREET i 13919 STRUOKMAN ROAD LONG BEACH, CA.-. 90812 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 CERRITOS, CA. 90701 23-145-13 23-145-14 23-146-01 LUTZ, GE6RGE L, JONES, GERALD ET AL WANK, RiCHARo E. 618 16TH STREET P. 0. Box 101 125 16TH STREET APT. 4 HUNTINGTQN BEACH, 92648 SUNSET BEACH$ CA. 90742 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 23-146-02 23-146-o4 23-146-05 RUNSVOLD, HAROLD S. DAVIS, I-Ewos F, LINDBORG9 LEONARD 0. 1131 BAUGHMAN DRIVE 5931 TREE T-r�p CIRCLE 112 48TH STREET CLAREMONT, CA. 91711 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 z " 3-141 14 23-142-02. 23 'OY, GEORGE D. ET �xl '` �. � ,NAR, RoBERT ET Ux DWARDS, CARLENE 19332 W NOR 001N4 '61tCLE 41 MELINDA CIRCLE 622 18TH STREET IUNTINGT'ON BEACH, „ C,�As,:.926138 HUNTINGTON REACH, CA. HUNTI +dGTON BEACH, CA.. 92648 2---- 142-04 _ = - 23-142-05 I _ - 0 -. 3- 23-1�i2- .6 A. J. FAAS' & SONS A. J. F"AAS & nNS PAXSON, WILLIAM R.. P. 0.• Box 892. P. 0. Box 89? 115 9TH STREET VAVL', COLQo '81657 VAI _, COLO. 81657 I HUNTINGTOy BEACH, CA. 92648 -07 23-142-08 MC DANIEL,., Ross P. ET Ux MC DANIEL, Ross P. ET Ux CLEMENT, MILDRED M. , Ji 610 18TH STREET 610 18Tt4 STREET 6o6 18TH STREET HUNTINGTON- BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNT14CSTO N BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CAo 92648 23-142-10 23-142-1'1 _.23-1 #z-413,,__. JEDINAK, RUSSELL M. c MONTGOMERY, DAMES Do GOETSCH, ELMER E. ET AL } 664 P. 0. Box 2245 i 1?06 PARK STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 I HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-142-14 23-142-15 23-142-16 GOETSCH, 'ELMER E. ET AL ROBINSON, HARRY GALKON, JOHN A. 12o6 PARK STREET I P, o, eox 66 101 HUNTfNGTON STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92 M 8 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 j HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 t 23-142-17 23-145-01 _.23-1.45-03 TEXAC09 INC. MAUK, THOMAS KIRK STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3350 WI}-SHIRE BOULEVARD 11j28 SOUTH SHOEMAKER AVENUE % MANN, MELVIN H. Los ANGELES, CA. 90010 ; WHITTIER, CA. 90605 2346 EAST LIVE OAK DRIVE Los ANGELES, CA. 90028 23-145-04 23-145-05 23-145-o. . GIPPLE, RICHMOND C. GIPPLE, RICHMOND C. URBAN RECONSTRUCTION CORD. 13919 STRUICKMAN ROAD j % WILSON, MICHAEL Jo 8750 SOUTH SEPULVEDA BLVpo CERRI.TOS, CA. 90701 13919 STRUIGKMAN ROAD i Los ANGELES, CA. 90045 CERRITOS) CA. 90701 �.- -�.� --- - -- _- - --23-14.5-07 I . . . ., z3-145-a8 � 23-145-04...., KOHNE, MICHAEL KNICKREHM, ROBERT W. HARRELL, ETHEL L. 8163 CARDITF DRIVE 8209 LINOEN CIRCLE 350 CEDAR AVENUE STANTON, CA. 90680 . j BUENA PARK, CA. 90620 I LONG BEACH, CA. 90812 23--145-10 I 23-145-11 23-145-12 HARRELL, ETHEL L. I NELSON, EMERSON W. JR. HOEFFLIGER, MELVIN J. 350 CEDAR AVENUE 513 18TH STREET 13919 STRUOKMAN ROAD LONG BEAM, CA., 90812 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 i CERRITOS$ CA. 90701 ----->- 23-145-13 23-145-14 23-146-01 LUTZ, GEORGE L. JONES, GERALD ET AL WANK, RICHARD E. 618 16TH STREET P. 0. BOX 101 125 16TH STREET APT. 4 HUNTINGTQN BEACH', 92648 SUNSET BEACH, CA. 90742 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 23-146-02 23-146-o4 23-146-05 RUNSVOLD, HAROLO` S. ! DAVIS$ LEWIs F� LINDBORG, LEONARD 0. 1131 BAUGHMAN DRIVE 5931 TREE Top CIRCLE 112 48TH STREET CLAREMONT, CA,, 91711 HUNTINGTONBVAC�4, CA. 92649 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23 06- HURMON0,.'1 MA'Ly YN CUR l TY F I RrT NATIONAL{C1NAL BANK fHURMOND MARYLYN ET ALJp ,296-L,A'MA, AVENUE F . 0. BCaX 2_'l.'j'�-t f mme NAL ANNEX *3296 LAMA AVENUE 0Po+9*BEACH, CA. 90808 i I_Os ANGELE S, CA. 90054 I,.ONG BEACH, CA. 90$08 23-146-o9 23-146-10 23-146-11 INDBORG, .LEONARD Qa BRAY, WILLOAM C. BRAY, WILLIAM C. ,.18TH STREET ` 1701 PARR '-rRE a:T 1701 PARK STREET T.UN 'INGTON'BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGT N F3EAC'••+y CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-1's6-13 23-146-14 23-146-15 HURMOND, MARYLYN , THURMOND, MARYLYN FRANKEL, 'ARTHUR ET UX 4 �296 LAMA AVENUE 3296 LAMA AvENUL- 622 16TH STREET APT A ONG BEACH, O.A. 90808 LONG BEACH, CA. 90808 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 i 23-146-16 23-151-01 23-151-04 O,VY, CHRIS REAHM, RICHARD P. HARRIS, GLADYS C.. 2EHNDER, LOWE'LL 205 13TH STREET 425 EAST OCEAN BIND. APT. 200 7172 SANTA IIISA6EL HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 LONG BEACH, CAo 90802 OUNTAIN VALLEY 92708 4 - 23-15.1-05. 23_151-06 23-151-07 I{TY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BITTER, NORMAN ET AL BITTER, NORMAN .ET AL IUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 % HUNTINGTON BEACH ASSOCIATES % HUNTINGTON BEACH ASSOCIATES 3727 NORTH 1ST ST. SUITE 101 3727 NORTH 1ST ST. SUITE1,101 FRE6N0, CA. 93726' FRESNO, CA. 93726 23-151-08 23-151-09 23-151-10 IACHRIS, MAYBELLE DURDA, RAYMOND G.. MC CLYMONDS, Roy C. i234 WEST 2ND STREET i 815 EAST BEVERLY PLACE .os ANGELES, CA. 90004 SANTA ANA, CA. 92701 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 23-152-01 :ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH d-UNTINGTON BEACH, CA., 92648 I i i i I I i i I 1 I I i I r 7�ou)a1 LOT) F. MACKENZIE BROWN (714) 979-4930 4630 CAMPUS DRIVE,SUITE 101 = NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92550 (213) 489-5006 458 SOUTH SPRING STREET, SUITE 809 LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90013 April 14 , 1975 Mr. William Hartge, Director Engineering & Public Works City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California Re: Assessment District No. 7301 (Townlot Assessment District) Dear Mr. Hartge: Enclosed herein find the following: q-Sl X 1. Order of Procedure 2 . Resolution Establishing Hearing Procedure gv 3 . Resolution Adopting Plat AS/,SA 4 . Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination PosT CC 'Door s/,g_ 5. Notice of Hearing B 6. Certificate of Posting - Streets-BY 51% WSD S/ 7. Certificate of Mailing �ScB t1L lv.�.�..� e,., s- ��r 8. Certificate of Posting - Council Chambers - _ _ s,/, /-q INSTRUCTIONS The resolutions are to be adopted in the order as set forth above, and as set forth in the Order of Procedure enclosed herein. PUBLICATION ✓��q L S/, xl/ -,- S-/,? Upon adoption of the Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination, it shall be published by two (2) consecutive insertions in the designated paper, the "Huntington Beach News, " the first publication to be at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date fixed for the hearing. POST STREETS /p ZAjs BE-Core, he,ah„vj -4V .s/d A copy of the Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination, headed by the words : "NOTICE OF HEARING, " such words to be in letters at least one inch in height, should be printed on cards or cardboard, and the City Clerk, pursuant to your procedural resolutions, should cause said "NOTICE OF HEARING" to be posted in accordance with the Affidavit of Mr. William Hartge -2- April 11, 1975 Huntington Beach, CA A.D. #7302 Posting. The posting must be completed at least ten (10) full days prior to the date fixed for the hearing. MAIL 11v M.41 L. r4 r L60s 7' f The Notice of Hearing should be mimeographed or printed on postcards or otherwise prepared for mailing, and must be mailed in accordance with the Certificate of Mailing; the mailing to be completed at least ten (10) full days before the date set for hearing. 1� POST , 7 Z!S .A copy of the Resolution Covering- Preliminary Determination shall be posted on or near the door of the Council Chambers at least five (5) days prior to the date of hearing. -51 All certificates of compliance to be filed in the office of the City Clerk are to have the respective notices attached thereto. Please send me conformed copies of each of the foregoing, together with copies of the certificates at your earliest convenience, and a copy of the Affidavit of Publication when you receive it. Ver my yours , L� F. Mackenzie Brown FMB/j Enclosures cc: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 4066 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A PLAT SHOWING THE GENERAL NATURE, LOCATION AND EXTENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT WORK AND SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, the City Council has received a plat showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed street improve- ment work and also designating and describing the boundaries of the area - proposed to be assessed in what is known and designated as; ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 F. (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recital is true and correct. SECTION 2 . That a plat of the assessment district showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed public improve- ment work and also showing and describing the boundaries of the proposed assessment district and lands and property to be specially assessed to pay all the costs and expenses of the proposed improvements designated as; ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) hereby submitted, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of April • MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: • 7 APPROVED TO FORM: DUN P. BONFNFA CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF City Attorney HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By: Deputy City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss• CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH , City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 4066 , was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of April 19 75 , and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES : COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None DATED this 22nd day of April 19 75 . CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SEAL) RESOLUTION NO. 4065 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL PRESCRIBING STEPS NECESSARY FOR CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE THEREOF ON THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY WHERE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS ARE PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION , LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931. " ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 . PROCEDURE AUTHORIZED. Before the Council adopts any resolution ordering the construction of any public improvement or the acquisition of any property for public use, or both, herein referred to as "improvement, " where the cost thereof is to be paid in whole or in part by special assessments or through special assessment taxes upon lands , a public hearing may be held and a finding and determination made by the Council as provided herein that the public convenience and necessity require the same. If such procedure is not so followed and if such finding and determination is not made pursuant thereto, the requirements otherwise prescribed by the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" (Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code) and Article XIII , Section 17 of the Constitution shall be complied with before any such resolution may be adopted. SECTION 2. ORDER TO HOLD HEARING: DETERMINATION OF NATURE OF WORK. The Council may order and hold a public hearing to find and determine whether the public convenience and necessity require any such improvement. Before ordering such hearing the Council shall determine in general the nature, location and extent of such proposed improvement or acquisition. Reference may be made to one or more plans, profiles, specifications, maps or plats for the description of the improvement and for all particulars relative thereto, which plans , profiles , speci- fications, maps or plats shall be on file with the City Clerk or the City Engineer and open to inspection. SECTION 3 . DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT . The Council shall also generally define the boundaries or extent of the district or lands to be specially assessed to pay all or any part of the cost of the proposed improvement. The district may be described by : (a) Stating the exterior boundaries thereof; or (b) Giving a description thereof according to any official or recorded map or mans. (c) Referring to a plat or map on file in the office of the City Clerk or City Engineer which shall indicate by a boundary line the territory to be included in the assessment district, and which shall govern for all details as to the extent of the district. SECTION 4 . TIME, PLACE IaID NOTICE OF HEARING. The Council shall fix a time and place of public hearing on the question whether the public convenience and necessity require such improvement and shall order such hearing to be held by the Council. The Council shall also prescribe reasonable notice of hearing to be given by publication and posting, which notice shall satisfy the minimum requirements provided by this Resolution. In prescribing such notice reference may be made to this Resolution for particulars. Also, said Council may prescribe other notice as deemed necessary or within the public interest as it relates to the particular proceedings . SECTION 5. PUBLICATION OF NOTICE. The City Clerk shall cause notice of such hearing to be published twice in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in this City. The first publication shall be not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of such hearing. SECTION 6. POSTING OF NOTICE. The Council shall direct the Superintendent of Streets to, and such Superintendent shall cause notice of such hearing to be conspicuously posted along the line of the con- templated work, at not more than 300 feet in distance apart, but not less than three in all , or, when the work to be done is only upon an entire crossing or intersection or any part thereof, in front of each quarter block or irregular block liable to be assessed. If the work is chargeable upon a district, copies of the notice shall also be posted on all the open streets within the district at not more than 300 feet in distance apart on each street so posted, but no pro- ceeding shall ever be held invalid for failure to post any street if this Section has been substantially complied with. In every case all posting must be completed at least ten (10) days before the day set for hearing protests or objections. SECTION 7 . FORM AND CONTENTS OF NOTICE. Such notice shall, in legible characters, state briefly the work proposed, designating by its short title or otherwise the act or procedure resolution under which the project or improvement is proposed to be undertaken; that the costs thereof or a part of such costs shall be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby; the day, hour and place of th*e hearing; that the Council proposed to find and determine whether the public convenience and necessity require the improvement; and that after such finding the proposed improvement may be ordered without further debt limitation or majority protest proceedings. Other pertinent matters may be included in the notice. SECTION 8 . PROTESTS . At the time set for the hearing, pro- tests may be made by any person interested who objects to the determi- nation by the Council that public convenience and necessity require the improvement, or to the ordering of such improvement, without further proceedings for majority protest or debt limitations. SECTION 9. HEARING: DECISION : EFFECT. The hearing may be continued from time to time. After the conclusion thereof and prior to adoption of a Resolution ordering the improvement, the Council shall consider and pass upon all protests filed and all matters presented and its decision thereon shall be final and conclusive. If by such decision the Council finds and determines by no less than a four-fifths (4/5) vote of all members thereof that the public convenience and necessity require such improvement the Council may thereafter, in accordance with the improvement act or procedure resolution specified or designated for the project, adopt a resolution ordering the improve- ment substantially as proposed, or as modified, altered or changed by order of the Council as authorized by the improvement act or procedure resolution for the project . After such finding and determination by the Council, the provision of law for debt limitation and majority protest as mentioned in Article XIII , -2- Section 17, of the Constitution shall not apply, and it shall not be necessary for the Council to prepare or to cause to be prepared, notice for hearing, hear, or report the hearing of any report thereon as to such improvement, except as may be required by the law or procedure resolution for the conduct of the improvement proceedings . SECTION 10. COMBINED HEARING AUTHORIZED. The hearing required by this Resolution may be a separate hearing or may be combined and held concurrently with the hearing required by the improvement act or Reso- ' lution of Intention, pursuant to which the improvement proceedings is proposed. SECTION 11. COMBINED NOTICE AUTHORIZED. Notice of hearinq required by this Resolution to be given by posting may be by posting a separate notice or may be by stating the necessary matters in a notice of hearing of protests posted pursuant to such improvement act or Reso- lution of intention. The publication of notice of hearing as required herein may be by pub- lishing a separate notice, or by setting forth necessary recitals therefor in the Resolution of Intention, if published, or in such other notice of hearing of protests as may be published pursuant to such improvement act or Resolution of Intention. In any event there must be both posting and publication of notice of hearing in the manner and for not less than the time required herein, and the time, place and purpose of this hearing must be stated in such notice, all as required by the Act under which the work is to be per- formed. SECTION 12. CONSTRUCTION. This Resolution shall be liberally construed in order to effectuate its purpose. SECTION 13. CONSTITUTIONALITY. If any section, subsection or portion of this Resolution is declared to be invalid or unconstitu- tional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Resolution, and the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , California hereby declares that it would have adopted all of the remaining sections, subsections , and portions of this Resolution notwithstanding. SECTION 14 . SHORT TITLE. This procedure Resolution may be cited, kpown, and referred to as the "Public Convenience and Necessity Determination Resolution. " APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of April 0.01 MAYOR—OF THE CI Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P. BONFA City Attorney F BY: HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deputy City Attorney -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss• CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH , City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 4065 , , was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the 2 s day of April 19 75 , and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES : COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None DATED this 22nd day of April , 19 75 , Ole- CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SEAL) R ' c ' �' /� H� •vows RESOLUTION NO. 4067 5-1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL COVERING PRELIMINARY DE`i'ERMINATION THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRES CERTAIN ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State' of California provides that the debt limitation and majority protest provisions of said section shall not apply if, after giving of such reasonable notice by publication and posting and the holding of such public hearing as the City Council shall have prescribed, said Council, by not less than four-fifths (4/5) vote of all members thereof, finds and determines that the public convenience and necessity require the improvement proposed to be made; and, WHEREAS, Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California provides that the "Special Assessment Investiga- tion, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" shall not apply to any proceedings otherwise subject thereto when said improvement proceed- ings are by a charter city and said city has complied with the provisions of Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of Cali- fornia; and, WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach is a charter city of the State of California, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE_ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: • SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That it is the preliminary determination of said City Council that the public convenience and necessity require that certain public street and utility improvements and acquisition in the City of Huntington Beach , California, hereinafter described, be made and that the cost and expense thereof be paid for by special assessments levied upon the property within the District benefited thereby; and that all necessary proceedings therefore be had and taken without compliance with the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. " SECTION 3. That certain costs and expenses of said acquisition and improvement shall be assessed against the lands benefited thereby., and the boundaries of the district of lands proposed to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of said proposed acquisition and improvement are as shown upon a map of the District entitled: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) hereto approved and adopted by the City Council and a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City and referenced for further particulars. SECTION 4 . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON MONDAY , THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 1975 , AT 7 :00 O'CLOCK PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, LOCATED AT 2000 MAIN STREET, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 , THERE SHALL BE A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall publish this Resolution in the "Huntington Beach News" a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Huntington Beach on two successive dates, the first publication to be made not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the above public hearing. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall cause Notice of said hearing to be posted along the line of the contemplated work and on all open streets within the Assessment District at not more than three hun- dred (300) feet in distance apart on each street so posted. SECTION 7 . The City Clerk is directed to mail Notices of said hearing to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed, whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized assessment roll for the City taxes, said mailing to be completed at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. SECTION 8. The following is a general description of the proposed works of improvement to be constructed within said Assessment District: A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal, and the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks , driveway approaches, paving, street lights , drainage structures , ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 41.8 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518, 519 , 520 , 521, 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars, reference is hereby made to the map attached hereto showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of April. 1975 MAYUR OF- TIM CITTOV ' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P. BONFA City Attorney CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF -2- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By: Deputy City Attorney .4 I i .i gowermwit W! � P Mnd • --- --�--T- --- - -1- - T-T- - 1I Mill ._III ItImr 7777, 117 r � �!r"�'7'!'I:illll l��:llillli 111 i 1- Zlrt • I�Ii • 1 I m ! �! • I --�-_!� '�_-- - - _1 L -L- I r • ! • OiT� III 717 LI Nth 'I _11i1:1,l l l f i l l l l.iii:�_�. _ ;? _ ;- `1 l i 111!if l'�J�11�!f�l�; ��1 � • T I I I 4 LLLL1 � LLl_-- ----- I �---I--�--�— � -1- --1 -L- -.17th - - - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH , City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 4067 , was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the 2lst day of April 19 75 , and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit : AYES: COUNCILMEN : Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES : COUNCILMEN : None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN : None DATED this 22nd day of April 19 75 . CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SEAL) RESOLUTION NO. 4064 RESOLUTION OF THE CI:'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION THEREOF WHEREAS, there has been submitted to this City Council an agreement relating to special counsel services for certain special assessment districts presently initiated or in process by .the City of Huntington Beach, California; and, WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to -pro- ceed with said assessment districts as set forth in said agreement and is desirous to employ special counsel for the purposes of completing said proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the special counsel agreement for special assessment districts in the City of Huntington Beach, California, as mentioned in said agreement is hereby approved and execution is auth- orized by the Mayor and City Clerk. SECTION 3. A copy of said agreement, as approved, is attached hereto and so referenced. SECTION 4. A copy of said executed agreement shall be immedi- ately transmitted upon execution to the parties as set forth in said agreement. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of April , 1975. MP,YOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: X/"0 CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY • uty City A for Y STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 4064 , was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the 21stday of April , 1975, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, NOES: COUNCILMEN Gibbs None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None DATED this 22nd day of April 1975. CITY CLERK OF T E CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SEAL) 73`5' 1 • City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT April 15, 1975 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Assessment Districts 7201 , 7301 & 7302 Gentlemen: The following Assessment District documents are hereby transmitted for your review and appropriate action: For Assessment District 7201, 7301 and 7302 Legal Counsel 1. Special Counsel Agreement 2 . Resolution Approving Special Counsel Agreement }� Since the passing of Mr. John T. Ganahl in February, 1975 , the City has been without an assessment district attorney. The attached doucments setforth the fees and duties for F . MacKenzie Brown as the City' s new special counsel. For Assessment District 7301 Townlot Assessment District 1. Order of Procedure 2. Resolution Establishing Hearing Procedure. 3. Resolution Adopting Plat 4 . Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination 5. Notice of Hearing 6 . Certificate of Posting - Streets 7 . Certificate of Mailing 8 . Certificate of Posting - Council Chambers Adoption of the above resolutions and agreement are necessary in order to proceed with the Townlot Assessment District and will permit the City to hold a public hearing at which time the involved land owners can state their opinion. t , Honorable Mayor and City Council April 15, 1975 Page 2 For Assessment District 7302 Old Town Drainage Assessment District 1. Resolution Readopting Boundary Map 2. Resolution Requesting Opinion of County Health Officer 3. Resolution of Intention The above resolutions and contract with Stone & Youngberg are necessary in order to proceed with the establishment of the Old Town Drainage Assessment District. It is recommended that your Honorable Body approve the trans- mitted documents and direct the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all agreements and resolutions. Very truly yours, H yHa r-t Director of Public Works HEH:WEH:ae Trans. r FOS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINCMN/EACH To City Attorney From H. E. Hartge Subject Agreements for Assessment Date April 15, 1975 Districts 7201, 7301 & 7302 Transmitted herewith are agreements which will be acted upon by the City Council at the meeting of April 21. Stone & Youngberg 1. Contract employingifinancial' consultants Stone and Youngberg (Townlot Assessment District 7301) . 2. Contract employing financial consultants Stone and Youngberg (Old Town Drainage Assessment District 7302) . F. MacKenzie Brown 1. Special consultant's agreement for Assessment Districts 7201, 7301 and 7302. It would be appreciated if you could review these agreements and, if satisfactory, forward on to Mr. Belsito. ` .- artge- ., _... Director of Public Works HEH:ae Trans. cc: 'ty Clerk Xud Belsito Jay ' = City of Huntington Beach CALIFORNIA 926" P.O. BOX 190 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 9, 1975 F. Mackenzie Brown Attorney at Law 4630 Campus Drive, Suite 101 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Mr. Brown: Subject: Assessment District No. 7301 (Townlot Assessment District) Assessment District No. 7302 (Old Town Drainage District) We are enclosing the following documents on Assessment District 7301 for your records. 1. Resolution No. 4065 - Establishing'hearing procedure. 2. Resolution No. 4066 - Adopting Plat. 3. Resolution No. 4067 - Covering preliminary determination, and affidavit. 4. Notice of hearing and affidavit. 5. Certificate of posting streets. 6. Certificate of mailing. 7. Certificate of posting Council Chamber. Also enclosed is Resolution No. 4068 - Readopting boundary map, Resolution No. 4069 - Requesting opinion of County Health Officer, and Resolution of Intention No. 4070, . all pertaining to Assessment District No. 7302. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:CB:lo r � v NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the 21st day of April , 19 75, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. . NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75, did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location- and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby -in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975, at the hour of 7 :0-0 PM o'clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour -and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. " Any persons interested in, or owning, property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. " All protests or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California and bonds will also be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the officd of the City Clerk for all particulars. The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these proceedings: A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal, and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, paving, street lights, drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances .and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth ' Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth. Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418, 419, 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520, 521, 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621, and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is hereby made to the map attached hereto showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: ,3D j s APPRo A5 T4 3M-_ 4OffV. IRMA CLERK � H C TY OF di" Ilt6asney HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By I Np4tty City Attorney -2- I ` �t1Ll I Ijjl ! I I II I I I I I I II ! I II' ifTT l IIII�I(' - ili"1"i;T";• T 1 �i 1.._.._.... _.. _.L --I-- Cc16 cc - -, ... . W61 ' Wu W!11 ' �1.,.. .,J ._;!.:. :..... k9.'..'-_ :�...�+ �li T1,.1Llli.i - C I, r1 ' l .-.L_._._._1_!.,il-lr.ri r- I Tr i � I !TT,-mITiT?iiiliiTiTl fl? - - �-:: - �` +�" `i :li'lil (4 ! ll1.111llL4 (� -- --:&a-:�6►-.�::- �:: !IUD I:!i.! ,;i.ii .i.;.Llll l.l.i.�1. 1 � PAL•. i T-_ 4VI MW Ifs N RESOLUTION NO. 3831 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01 TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, State of California, in regular session assembled, that in the event the contractor awarded the contract for doing the work and making the improvements in this assessment district does not complete said work and improvements within the time limit specified in said contract, or within such further time as this City Council , through its Director of Public Works, shall have authorized, then and in that event the said contractor shall pay to said City of Huntington Beach, California liquidated damages in the amount of $100. 00 per day for each and every day 's delay beyond said time of completion of said work and improvements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the specifications for doing said work and making said improvements shall contain provisions in accordance herewith. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any monies received by said City of Huntington Beach, California on account of such liquidated damages shall be applied as follows : 1. If received prior to confirmation of the assessment herein , such monies shall be applied as a contribution against the assessment. 2 . If received after the confirmation of the assessment, such monies shall be applied in the manner provided in Section 5132. 1 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California .for the disposition of excess acquisition funds. -1- 3. If a contribution has theretofore been made or ordered by any agency, other than this City Council, then a refund a shall be made to• said contributing agency in the proportion which said contribution bears to the total cost and expenses of the work. ADOPTED the 21st day of January, 1974. 90 A A ayo ATTEST : City Clerk - r ;,,, _,•_> No. 3831 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day Of January 19�_, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: �Shipley. Bartlett. Gibbs, Green. Matney. Duke, Coen NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None • J,451 City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California RESOLUTION NO. 3830 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01 TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, in regular session assembled that the Engineer of Work of this assessment district be, and he hereby is , directed to prepare a plat or map showing the boundaries of the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost of the proposed acquisition of easements and rights of way, and work and improvements in this assessment district. ADOPTED the 21st day of January, 1974 . Pa or ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said city, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the 21st day of January, 1974, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs. Green. Matney, Duke, Coen NOES: COUNCILMEN None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None City Clerk By -2- • 4 RESOLUTION NO. 3829 RESOLUTION APPOINTING ATTORNEY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT f4o 73-01 ';OWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, in regular session assembled, that JOHN T. GANAHL of GANAHL & GANAHL, Attorneys at Law, of Corona, California, be and he hereby is appointed as attorney to prepare all resolutions , notices and other papers and proceedings for any work and improvements that may be hereafter authorized by said City Council in this assessment district; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said attorney shall receive as compensation for his services herein an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the confirmed construction costs of this assessment district; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said compensation shall be paid at the time of the recording of the assessment in the office of the Superintendent of Streets . BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED that if said proceedings shall fail to be carried to conclusion, said attorney shall be paid a reasonable compensation for his services performed, as determined by said City Council; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said services shall not include any services for litigation, for preparation or examination of legal descriptions , or services in procurement of land, easements , and rights of way, but shall be solely for the preparation of all resolutions , notices and other papers and proceedings required -1- ' by the provisions of either the Improvement Act of 1911, or the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 , and the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 in conducting the proceedings for the work herein contemplated, and the rendition of an unconditional opinion of the validity of the proceedings. ADOPTED the 21st day of January, 1974 . a r ATTEST: C ty er -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said city, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the 21st day of January, 1974, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley. Bartlett, Gibbs, Green- M tnpy, Dnkp- rnpn NOES: COUNCILMEN None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None 00 City Clerk By -3- w RESOLUTION NO. 3828 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NEWSPAPER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01 TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California , in regular session assembled , that the Huntington Beach News , a newspaper published and cir- culated in the City of Huntington Beach, California , be and the same is hereby designated as the newspaper in which shall be published all notices , resolutions , orders and other matters required to be published in connection With the proceedings to be had and taken in this assessment district . ADOPTED the 21st day of January, 1974 a yor ATTEST: 00 ' City Clerk �w STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said city, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the 21st day of January, 1974, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Matney, Duke, Coen NOES: COUNCILMEN None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None Z a City Clerk By -2- �w RESOLUTION NO. 3827 RESOLUTION APPOINTING SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS AND ENGINEER OF WORK AND ASSESSMENT ENGINEER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01 TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, in regular session assembled, as follows: 1. H. E. HARTGE, Director of Public Works and City Engineer of said City of Huntington Beach, be and he hereby is appointed as Superintendent of Streets and Engineer of Work of this assessment district to render all required engineering services in this assessment district. All work to be done in this- assessment district shall be done under the direction and to the satisfaction of said engineer of work and all materials used in said work shall comply with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of said engineer of work. 2. DONALD E. STEVENS, INC. , Civil Engineers, , having its principal office for the doing of business in the City of Costa Mesa, State of California, be and he hereby is appointed as Assessment Engineer of this assessment district and shall perform all required assessment services in this assessment district. ADOPTED the 21st day of January, 1974. Mayor ATTEST: 004 City Clerk _1_ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said city, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the 21st day of January, 1974, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs Green. Matney, Duke. Coen NOES: COUNCILMEN None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None City Clerk By -2- OKI1070PG 1044 �- 332 Gi RESOLUTION NO. 3838 RECORDrD IN OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RECORDING REQUESTED RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MAP c;5 c-i!:`! Y. OAL. BY AND MAIL TO � 4 �� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01 FEB 7q Office of the City Clerk TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT J. WYLIE LYLE P. O. BOX 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA COUNTY RECORDER Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, State of California, in regular session assembled, that the proposed boundaries of the assessment district proposed to be assessed in this assessment proceeding to pay any part of the cost of the proposed improvement in this assessment district are as shown upon a map of the assessment district now on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City of Huntington Beach, and entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 73-01, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA", and which map indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in this assessment district. Said plat or map is hereby adopted as the plat or map describing the extent of the territory to be included in this proposed assessment district. The City Clerk of said City of Huntington Beach is hereby ordered and directed to endorse upon the original and at least one copy of said map her certificate evidencing the date and adoption of this resolution. Thereafter, said Clerk shall file the original of said map as so endorsed in said Clerk' s office, and shall forthwith thereafter file a copy of said map executed as hereinbefore directed with the County Recorder of Orange County, California. .". - ADOPTED the 4th day of . Februar , 1974. Mayd'r TEST: City Clerk 9-6-I1a _ SEC'i- ZONAL DISTR J MA-P 10-6-I , ------- NOTE• CITY OF ADOPTED MARCH 7. 1960 •++ t.x+r. �+.,, +.• +• " - - +„ alx xr�elPr.•1+-'x+• �+, i..r rx�r 1\ CITV COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 754 .j EGEND~ 4 40-o AME--TN-DeE2 D Os9R9D]9!NO. .U-END Q RD.No 7-1-72 1710 2-7-72 1711 _ ;,L1e ..0l�i71 J �TI G1 ®N BEACH .21-6e 1186 27-72 1711 T7; 9-8-67 1348 2- 171] 2-1 2- - cec•n N72 7 1714 rR 1 G ECOUNTY CALIFORNIA IO-19.TO 1606 2--7-71 71] 5-3-71 643 27 1c`.uEoDn:°+.U+...•:,mr1.EN.w.�a•I�e0r Pr:C•rr�r.3aO�rr1 ..•-+.N..e�•D -AMENDED BY ZONE CASE 1•3-72 1707 72 1749 6-l- 19 -7z 744.2B).,a2541 67-4.6e-31.70 7 77-]11A,71-b1B1,72-+617L 7-17 63 ••n•n ,.x.t..or.•••..,• .r a�r.•a;[•.c;or O.[ra,+x•a:.ccr x�rcrw r'm'��.a. +:,•:+2:r- ..•[.•:rx. - ••:. - ,� �. p, eT or +..DC[a+•v[ DN s.:e a[.r,•. / 4 ^� er Dr eE b- " /.`: .�0 4: ti ;-a j corPNE:+.++x u<.•n•crn. 10'M2-01 �. � '� P j"<a; cn•aPNo rnx nr rrooucro. v4 M2-01 :. -- --- ...._-- --- __ ....__...._-- _ _ ---�.. . _�\._ Qti �••- - - ---- - - - �--�- C1 M2-0 \ R4-0 = ti M 2-02 o. _ Q e�_ ,0, . � 4° Qom' Q� __— /4S„ Q�� y '➢/- a •� a�, - �r�, y~ Q� _— P p7 pry p pryer,. ;- 0�-�qG h - 4��r`j'• _.' Q� _ p� - Q Qry yam. r P �r ..__ QA3 r c p �. P /.0 C 3 � Q• _ I Q ,�r \ C3 pa Q aE�r r C3 2F �, QP C£ \ \ } 1 Qti \` I It ,�` s • ' eK 11070PG 1046 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I ALICIA. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex—officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the - City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all. the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the 4th day of February, 1974, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Duk6 NOES: COUNCILMEN None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN Coen, Matney . City Clerk The foregoing instrument i5 a"correct copy of By the original on file in this office. Attest -- - -�--- ---=_=------- 19 City Clerk and Ex-Officio .Clerk of the Cit;! Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal. CONFORMED COPY f-v� l/a70V69 1044— .E Not Compared with Original. l0 C1 RECORCIED IN RESOLUTION NO. 3838 OFFICIAAL RECORDS OF RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MAP Re 5 4 33 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01RLYL_ TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT J. WYLiL CA it HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA COUNTY RECOPiDER BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, State of California, in regular session assembled, that the proposed boundaries of the assessment district proposed to be assessed in this assessment proceeding to pay any part of the cost of the proposed improvement in this assessment district are as shown upon a map of the assessment district now on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City of Huntington Beach, and entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 73-01, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, .COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" , and which map indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory included in this assessment district. Said t plat or map is hereby adopted as the plat or map describing the extent of the territory to be included in this proposed assessment district. ' The City Clerk of said City of Huntington Beach is hereby ordered and directed to endorse upon the original and at least one copy of said map her certificate evidencing the date and adoption of this resolution. Thereafter, said Clerk shall file the original of said map as so endorsed in said Clerk' s office, and shall forthwith thereafter file a copy of said map executed as hereinbefore directed with the County Recorder of Orange County, California. d "ADOPTED the 4th day of Februa , 1974. Mayer p � T�A9 TEST: . City Clerk t k< /) �J i ��y�� U - -- - - -- - 9-6-11 a - SECTIONAL DIS.TRI ,,. L MA-P 10-6-11 - - . NOTES CITY OF ADOPTED MARCH 7. 1960 �"tuu•r�1' y.. .x•r`.}... �1Nrr CITT COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 754 'LEGEND . !IM[NE ORD.NO• AtlEN0E0 RO.NO :•1;'.•••.• ••• •. •.•. . 7-.s7--6e22 2-7-72 17110e9 e 2-7-72 171, `:.c'.n 7_)'.�:'•1.1 4':"g!O rNN',e'[•N.aA cJP'.r.0 t•N •-•r• .•'V'n•~ •eer-.Ct a•'l•o-♦c• ', 2HUNTINGTON BEACH -21-66 1196 2.7-72 2.77 1712 9.19-67 34e 2 7 J 47-e9 1 2-7-72 171, 0.19- 606 27-72 75tR ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 5-5-71 1643 2-7-72 1716 Ct SJrrll LEGEND 1-]-72 1707 5-5-72 1T49 1_3.ouerrtc u+•0. •".c.:='c+ AMENDED By ZONE CASE 5-s 72 749 Cn co0N7[ .Z 6•. •NO7..C7.ON 234.26,.:e2.S45.67-4.6e-51.70 10,71-I,71.55.7,-lI CI,7o-51mi71-SIO.71-01(Fl,n•lIR0.71-510Q71-JI{J1. • b- ro + 7_17-72 1763 eouNOED ..wLr M 7,-SI141,71 31(e 1.72-161:1. NO P s7 ON u..MfA AVE O.30.s a[•[.'• 37 Or S( Pry Ita I ctrnN.Nn snN mt.PnoOuc.a M2-01 M2-0 pti e ��7. vu pti R1-0 R 4-0 �< pv p�` 49. ♦ Q� -— Qry 9 b j%o. aj' ."'4• ti pti y4� c i,C .•• ? - M 2-02 o .��: p� p_ '+ eti pti �� -. -�/•r 1.0 q _ p b �2� p p p1 yti. OC�gti =A, �_r p ,g?,4yyr1 + b� p� M +c�'f ?, •1. 0j. \\ C Opp ? .•r p b y'h ,i /. O ♦'P f c E V \^ pA O �\ Cad pb C f4� a\ o s STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I ALICIA WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted. by. the. affirmative vote of more than a majority of all.. the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the 4th day of February, 1974, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Duke NOES: COUNCILMEN None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN Coen, Matney City Clerk By The foregoing instrument is a correct copy of the-original on fife in this office. Attest _ _ S19.211 ----•--;-------.. ....--- City Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal. I 1 1 A City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT January 28, 1974 C�✓ Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Town Lot Assessment District No. 73-01 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the map of the proposed boundaries of the Town Lot Assessment District No. 73-01 and the resolution approving said boundry map as ordered by Resolution No. 3830 adopted January 21, 1974 The Assessment District area is from Orange Avenue to Palm Avenue and from Seventeenth Street to Goldenwest Street. It is recommended that your Honorable Body adopt the .res- olution and direct the City Clerk to record the map as directed in the resolution. Very truly yours, U 4.1-��ZHaZtr-e----- Director of Public Works HEH:JFM:ml Encl. City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I January 11, 1974 � 3 .Honorable Mayor and City Council ' City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City AdmrTowntot Subject: Distr=District ssessm Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith are the following resolutions.'.-in connection with the Town Lot Assessment District 73-01. 1. Resolution appointing Superintendent of Street, an Engineer of Work and Assessment Engineer. 2. Resolution designating newspaper. 3. Resolution ordering preparation of Assessment District bound ,_map. 4 . Resolution appointing attorney. 5. Resolution fixing liquidated damages. The above resolutions are first of the required legal steps to process this district. Upon establishment of the layout of street alignments and closures by the Planning Department and processed through the Planning Commission the EIR preparation and processing will commence. The project will also require obtaining a permit from the Coastal Commission. Preparation of the street improvement plans and specifi- cations will be accomplished by the City Engineering Department. It is recommended that your Honorable Body adopt the resolutions. ° Very truly yours, E �are c `Q "z Director of Public Works S� HEH:JFM:el and City Engineer cc: Attorney' s OfficeiJ) 'LpN�;iVG.�1 ZONING QM 10 9-6-11 a SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 10-6-II NOTE: CITY OF yL {Wfrp.a r•[ Ir r{[r AOOPTt0 MARCH T. 199O •rr'lore •OV-4, •"i•ylr of wo q are«1K► r0 /•r,[«p io rr[ CIr/P, GTY COUNCIL ONO1NANCt 00 s3o or fool"' I w Wr LEGEND: AMENDED QNQ,No, A11,11,1010 2" NO (�jU iaµ{ roue gameru oyrur.r HLTNTINGTON BEACH 1Ari r•p .LII •L[Iptrcl Gfr«Itr p-7-3t !/3 i4•Tt 1710 •rnrto rm nnf rfru.r •[awru Gaud /t-l-3t 3t3 :-7-7L 1T11 IE41 rOLnrlt rarer ■t upertf aa•ur b21-p! ppp t•7-72 1712 L'Ct)•[Netai .o�reU owltv., 3•N-O7 1]03 t-7.7t 17q IQt•m u+oraaa. oww, 1IOT! t-7-7t 171• ((c.a arruerr. ctTilarvrr[fK c•t m—,nnrAter ORANGE, COUNTY CALIFORNIA 0 443 2-7.72 171p r 7 p-]-71 NA Y4-72 ITIt SUFFIX LEGEND• AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: R 1-]-72 1707 COI OOrtlrtO rirr OIL r•owictio" E cams"o W,I.OIL r•OOUL I.Q. Ir Mt• 234.261,262,pop,6T-16,40-31,7010,71-i,71.33,71-]It'J,TI-]1�1,7b31E111•]IW1,71.31QTI•]Ip/,71a14. t�%`�,• gaOlp n nµr An onr[,OaOErsta •/Y u• n oil •r,Ofi•«art OA$W.a]t"t«r" 1J J' 1 a/ 0« at. ( 1 CO11•!a WIT"R r'A(Owm COMO=MIN°a pouprcrm. w I CI Qt \� R 4-0 RI-0 M 2-02 A ? �aF,' P,�L Qy •, erPr P, •_ o - `�QaPa + ? CF-R ti b�' WYf'r rD +oaf" P�•• a' a; a c,� � ci.0 C � P=� a •a `� `� �, Q' Qua --` •0 a \, o49 a: pa \`\`� 4a Q•Pa �� ;�-•- a ,�,a�'a 03 Q• a� � co (8 4 0 03 to cF �y f Huntington City o Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT January 29 , 1973 N "0 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Town Lot Assessment District No. 1 A.D. 73-01 Gentlemen: A presentation. was recently made to the Planning Commi.ssion .by the Planning Director regarding a new concept for the development of the area bounded by 17th Street, Orange Avenue , Goldenwest Street and Palm Avenue. Interest was evidenced of the possibility of the creation of an assessment district to provide streets, alleys , landscaping, sidewalks , street lights and under- ground utilities. To facilitate immediate progress of the assessment district, it is requested that authorization be granted to employ John Ganahl as the attorney for the. District, and-'Don Stephens as the engineer.. The Planning Director will be prepared to again discuss the proposed improve- ments . Very truly yours, -2 James R. Wheeler Director of Public Works JRW:EIL:ae PROPOSED -- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 j CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA (TOWN LOT ASSE SM E NT DISTRICT NO. 1 ) JAN. 29,1973 SCALE 1'=200' DISTRICT BOUNDRY - PALM Ay � I E 11 V' I �t 1 I ACACIA AVE. I PECAN ! AVE I I Li N QI O N N N OD ORAN G IhY -� __ _ � �tleCrnrre fa H=i.[NT11 CrT NI r E ACH= ■ ■ A SIGNATURES OPPOSED TO A.D. 7301 1. f Louise J. Woolsey- 6. Mary J. Bauman 113 Via Venezia c/o Mary J. Krog Newport Beach, CA 1051 E. Tujunga Ave AP #23-122-06 Burbank,-.CA 91501 1c.Lots 9o&' 11&?1Block 421 AP#23,-114,08 Lots 13 & 15 Block 619 2. Roy B. Woolsey, Atty at Law 2099 San Joaquin Hills Road 7. Thomas K. Johnson Newport Center - Newport Beach AP 023-122-05 609 20th Street Lotskl3=& 15Lo�sBlock5421 Huntington Beach Lots 9 & 11 - Block 620 3. Harry and4Helen Robinson 613 17th Street 8. Tom & Rosemary Ward Huntington Beach 16741 Summer Cloud Lane Huntington Beach AP #23-142-15 613-615 17th Street 415 19th Street AP #23-124-09 4. Dorothy E. Arnold Also shown as Eileen S. Arnold 324 Main Street Huntington Beach AP 23-114-09 609 19th Street 5. Harold R.i;�Adams 614-C 21st Street Huntington Beach AP4232113?04 614 21st Street Huntington Beach 6, Va-ne E. Strong POSTCARDS RECEIVED PHONE Verne E. Strong 830-0713 Thelma Reahm 960-1079 100 foot lot 50 foot lot AP #23-141-11 AP 23-151-01 Max S. Schreiber 846-1371 Steven J. Griger 536-4262 406 22nd Street 125 foot lot 50 foot lot AP #23-124-13 AP #23-122-092 Louis J. Woolsey Thomas Terich 675-9875 AP 23-122-06 673-8565 (letter also) 112 A 36th St 50 foot lot Newport Beach 50 foot lot Gerald Jones 592-1636 AP 23-141-0j AP #23-145-14 Thomas K. Mauk 213-944-5079 50x120 cor lot Block 518 Lots 26-28 50 foot lot Ethel L. Harrell 536-6715 AP 23-145-01. 150 ft lot F. L. Hardesty 960-1677 AP 23-145-09 25 foot lot AP 23-145-10 AP #23-141-02 v POSTCARDS (Continued) Kathryn Marlar 536-7468 Norman Bitter 431-2684 50 foot lot 150 ft lot AP #23-113-11 AP #23-151-06 AP #23-151-07 Mr. Mahlig? 962-3835 50 foot lot C. D. Howe 213-427-8991 150 ft lot Baumgardner 714-753-1670 or 1620? AP #23-124-05 50 foot lot AP #23-124-06 AP #23-124-11 Goetsch 536-3582 George Garson 415-592-1174 150 ft lot 50 foot lot AP #23-142-13 AP #23-114-10 AP #23-142-14 DonaleJ. Hunt 213-842-6717 Mildred M. Clement 536-2839 50 foot lot 50 foot lot AP #23-115-04 AP #23-142-09 Sheny Baun? 213-430-3398 50 foot lot John Saunders 542-1701 AP #23-121-03 25 duplex Lloyd A. Wickstrom 536-0809 ? 50 foot lot 50 foot lot 632-1516 AP #23-113:1703 414 22nd Street AP #23-122-09.1 Michael Corley 644-0558� 100 ft lot A. J. Faas & Sons 303-476-2739 AP #23-123-03 50 foot Lot AP #23-123-04 AP #23-142-04 AP #23-142-05 Robert E. Clairmont 536-7750 50 foot lot George R. Michelle 536-8992 200 foot lot Harry Robinson 536-6908 50 foot lot John A. Galkin 536-3120 AP #23-142-15 (see letter 50 foot Lot AP #23-142-16 Clyde E. Jones Jr. 531-3625 50 foot lot ? AP #23-113-09 100 foot Lot 846-1371 George A. Green Jr. ? 531-3868 Evelyn Goergens 415-493-7086 50 foot lot 100 ft lot Lots 6,8,10,12, Blk 619 Gladys Bryant 633-6632 - Bus 613 & 617 20th St 867-6284 Chris Bovy 213-598-1232? 100 ft lot 50 foot lot AP #23-113-14 Lots 18&20 Blk 517 AP #23-113-15 AP #23-146-16 A. M. Redan? 536-2507 150 foot Lot 50 foot Lot Harold R. Adams 960-1128 50 foot lot AP #23-113-04 POSTCARDS (Continued) Lynn H. Lockyer 536-9898 500 foot lot AP #23-141-08 - 25' Steven L. Butcher, AVP 213-670-0150 200 foot Lot AP #23-145-06 AP #23-113-06 Richard Wann 536-4897 125 ft lot AP #23-146-01 Mary J. Bauman 849-2568 50 ft lot Lots 13 & 15 Blk 619 (Letter also) AP #23-114-08 Eileen Arnold 536-3835 or 536-1414 or %orothy Arnold 50 foot lot (Letter also) AP #23-114-09?_ John L. Peterson 536-8956 2�rIF foot lot AP #23-112-04 Rosemary Ward 846-5975? Thomas Ward 50u`t lot (Letter also) AP #23-124-09 ' ?? 536-8614 25 foot lot James Tunstall 979-1857 AP #23-115-12 AP #23-115-11 f SUMMARY REPORT TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TWO ORDINANCE and TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 73-01 May 5, 1975 1.0 INTRODUCTION: Although planning efforts in the Townlot area go back more than five years, the date most significant in this latest effort is September 24, 1975. On that date -a joint meeting was held between the City Council and the Planning Commission in response to diffi- culties experienced in processing City-approved projects in the Townlot area, and focused on resolving conflicts between the City and the South Coast Regional Commission. At that meeting, the status of the current General Plan Amendment for the Townlot area was presented and a five point implementation strategy proposed. Based on staff recommendations for the General Plan, the implementation strategy divided the Townlot area into five Specific -Plan areas. The plan proposed in this report is Area Number Two as presented that evening. The General -Plan Amendment was. subsequently approved on March 10 , 1975, and cleared the way for the implementation program. A draft report on the Townlot Specific Plan for Area Two and the Assessment District was prepared by the Planning Department Staff in October, 1974. It was distributed to property owners, builders, and other interested parties for review and comment. Also, Planning Commission study sessions were held on the document. A Specific Plan Ordinance was then proposed and the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 13, and April 15, 1975. It is anticipated-'=that the Planning Commission will adopt the ordinance at its May 6 , 1975 meeting. In conjunction with the Specific Plan effort, the Planning Depart- ment and Public Works Department have been. developing the assess- ment district plans. The City Council, at the request of City Staff, set the Public hearing for the assessment district for May 19, 1975. . The intent of this report is to objectively set forth the essential information on the Specific Plan ,Ordinance and Assessment District necessary for the public hearings on the Assessment District and Specific Plan Ordinance on May 19 , 1975; indicate development options for thi-s-area- if the assessment district-or .spec.ific plan is not successful; and present final staff recommendations on ~` the assessment -district and the specific plan. t Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 2 2. 0 PLAN DESCRIPTION Y The implementation plan for Area Two is unique in that a Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District are proposed as a hand-in- hand method of providing for development in accordance with the General Plan. 2. 1 SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE: The Specific Plan Ordinance is a set of development regulations that obviate the base zoning district regulations. The specific plan itself becomes the zoning on property within its boundaries. In addition to regulation of private land development, the specific plan provides for public improvements that are in conformance to the design standards set forth in the assessment district. The Specific Plan regulations provide for: a. Uniform density provisions which are in conformance to the General Plan. b. Improved development standards , including: (1) Increased on-site open space (now called livability space) . (2) Increased flexibility in setbacks and other "building envelope" requirements to encourage better design. (3) Relief on the number of on-site parking spaces required. C. Density incentives to consolidate lots; primarily to the 100' lot level and complete block. 2.2 TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 73-01 The assessment district is a method of financing the public im- provements necessary to raise the existing conditions of public right-of-way to an acceptable level of service. In addition, it provides the necessary public improvements to implement the parking court concept. Briefly, the assessment District provides for the following: a. Adjusting street grades for the parking courts. b. Curbs, gutters , sidewalks, and street paving. C. Improvement of alleys. d. Street lighting and signs. e. Necessary utility improvements: storm drains, sewer laterals, and water service. f. Underground utilities : Edison lines and telephone. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 3 g. Aesthetic improvements , including: backbone landscaping of all streets not used for parking courts; landscaping, irri- gation and stamped concrete in parking court cul-de-sacs; and landscaping at parking entrances and islands along courts. 3. 0 PLAN NEEDS STATEMENT: 3.1 Specific Plan Ordinance: ,The Specific Plan Ordinance is necessary to replace the outdated zoning district regulations for this area. It provides for deve- lopment which is in conformance to the recently adopted General Plan (15 dwelling units per gross acre) . It also provides incen- tives to consolidate lots into larger parcels , thereby increasing the development suitability of the parcel. The plan also satisfies the need to improve the quality of deve- lopment taking place in the area. By providing increased on-site open space and more flexible development standards , the plan will foster development that will provide a marked contrast to the presently developed units that cover much of the lot area with concrete and perpetuate so-called "cookie-cutter" designs. 3.2 Assessment District: With the sudden transition of this area from oil production to residential development, there is a need to install public improve- ments that provide a level of service commensurate with City-wide standards. Furthermore, in order to implement the development regulations set forth in the specific plan, it is necessary to pro- vide for the "parking court concept" and associated improvements. As the Assessment District area continues to develop, the present practice of providing for off-site improvements as each lot develops will be- come unacceptable. Development will take place as market forces dis- tate, creating blocks in varying stages of development. With the area presently approximately 20 percent developed, it will not be long before it will be necessary to upgrade all public improvements to adequately service residents of the area. Thus , it is most desirable to provide for the improvements as a unit and upgrade the entire area at once. This will not only raise the level of service, but will also provide an immediate aesthetic improvement to the area and to the image of Huntington Beach. While it is evident that the public improvements are needed, the responsibility for financing must be determined. Presently, deve- lopers ale contributing on a pay-as-you-go basis . The assessment district is a method whereby the major responsibility for financing the improvements would remain with the property owners and allow immediate upgrading of the area. This is felt to be the most feasible method of financing. r Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 4 4. 0 FINANCING ALTERNATIVES: TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 4. 1 Alternative I - Continue Existing Situation Standard Street Improvements - Major Items 50' Frontage Lot Interior Corner Street Removals 320. 00 1, 160. 00 Street Paving 950. 00 3,100. 00 Curb and Gutter 200 . 00 500. 00 Sidewalk 150. 00 420. 00 Street Trees 150. 00 150. 00 Street Lights (Average) 230. 00 230. 00 Alley 350. 00 400. 00 Sewer Lateral 150. 00 150. 00 Water Service 300. 00 300. 00 Storm Drains (of fee) 500. 00 500. 00 3 , 300. 00 6, 910. O0 4. 2 Alternative II - Existing Improvement Standards Through Assessment District Same street improvements as Alternative I, except by assessment district and adjustment (10%) for corner lot. Add 15 percent for incidental expenses. Interior Corner 4, 850. 00 5,334. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 4,850. 00 = 873, 000 t 72 Corner Lots @ 5, 334. 00 = 384 ,000 1, 257, 000 i a F t 4 i Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 5 4. 3 Alternative III - Assessment District per Specific Plan Add to major items above the following: Interior Corner Parking Court Concept 700. 00 700. 00 Stamped Concrete 100. 00 100. 00 Landscaping 100. 00 100. 00 Underground Edison 1,500. 00 1,500. 00 Underground Telephone 100. 00 100. 00 2,500. 00 2, 500. 00 Incidentals (15%) 400. 00 400. 00 2, 900. 00 2,900. 00 Basic Cost for Assessment District (Alternative II) 4, 850. 00 5,334. 00 7,750. 00 8,234. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 7,750 = 1, 395, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 8,234 = 595, 000 2,000, 000 4. 4 Alternative III (A) - Assessment District per Specific Plan Eliminate underground utilities @ 1, 600. 00/lot. Interior Corner 6, 150. 00 6,634. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 6,150. 00 = 1,107. 000 72 Corner Lots @ 6, 634. 00 = 478,000 1,585 , 000 . 1 a'°.@3r'«y?t•yr'�.v- -a-,,�e!'r.�..�'°,, , ;. .,,,.:. _�;.�.N" f� ..pt ..�.,�`hs �',,;�;,;,�: o-,, ,t_ .. "{gj'k �s*�„ Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 6 4. 5 Alternative III (B) - Same as Alternative III (A) and Eliminate Arterial Street Improvement Costs from Assessment District 17th Street and Goldenwest @ 300. 00 per lot Palm and Orange Avenues @ 500. 00 per lot Interior Corner 5, 350. 00 5, 834. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 5, 350. 00 = 963 , 000 72 Corner Lots @ 5, 834 . 00 = 420, 000 1, 383, 000 4. 6 Alternative III (C) - Same as III , Except Arterial Street Improvement Costs are Eliminated from Assessment District Interior Corner 6, 950. 00 7, 434. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 6 , 950. 00 = 1, 251, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 7, 434. 00 = 535, 000 1 , 786, 000 4. 7 Comparative Annual Payments Through Assessment District (20-Year Payment Period @ 7 Percent Interest ALTERNATIVE II Interior Lot @ $4 , 850. 00 = $451. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 5, 334. 00 = 496. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III Interior Lot @ $7, 750. 00 = $720 . 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 8, 234. 00 = 760. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III (A) Interior Lot @ $6 ,150. 00 = $572. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 6, 634 . 00 = 617. 00 per annum Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 7 ALTERNATIVE III (B) Interior Lot @ $5, 350. 00 = $498. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 5 , 834. 00 = 543. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III (C) Interior Lot @ $6 , 950. 00 = $646. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 7 ,434. 00 = 691. 00 per annum 4. 8 Annual Payments at Selected Interest and Bond Payment Period per $1, 000 of Assessment Annual Payment Percent Years Amount Per 1, 000 8% 15 1, 000 115 8% 20 1,000 100 8% 25 1, 000 93 7% 15 11000 108 7% 20 1, 000 93 7% 25 1, 000 85 4. 9 Cost to City to Participate in Assessment District Four 50' Corner Lots ) Includes Senior Citizens ' Facility at 17th and Orange Eleven 50 ' Interior Lots ) Alternative I - 53, 940 Alternative II - 75, 000 Alternative III - 118, 500 Alternative III (A) - 94 , 186 Alternative III (B) - 82 ,186 Alternative III (C) - 106 ,186 City must pay total within 30 days of district formation. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 8 5. 0 REACTION TO SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROPOSALS. 5. 1 Property Owner' s Reaction: To date, property owners representing approximately 20 percent of the land area have formally expressed opposition to the proposals. This opposition was expressed as follows: a. Testified at Planning Commission public hearings : March 13, 1975: 5 property owners, . 46 net acres , or 1. 4% of net land area. March 15, 1973: 2 property owners , . 60 net acres, or 1. 8% of net land area. b. Signed petition circulated by Mr. Richard Wann: 22 property owners, 5. 67 net acres, or 16 . 7% of net land area. In addition, the major property owner in the plan area, the Hunt- ington Beach Company (12 acres , or 35% of net land area) has ex- pressed support for the project if costs are kept within $1 ,00 per square foot of net land area ($6 , 000. 00 per 50 foot lot) . 5. 2 Builder' s Reaction: Although no formal position has been taken by the Huntington Beach Landowners Association or by other builder organizations, staff' s interpretation of their individual reactions can be summarized as follows : a. They concur with the assessment district if the costs are in line with benefits received. b. Their primary concern is for the City and Coastal Commission to come to terms so they are not caught in the middle. 5. 3 Coastal Commission: The State and South Coast Regional Commissions have taken different positions on the City' s five-point plan for the Townlot area and the proposals for Area Two. The Regional Commission has expressed support for the proposed Spec- ific Plan and Assissment District for Area Two. They also support the five-point implementation strategy. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 9 The State Commission staff, however, does not support either the five- point strategy or the proposals for Area Two. Normally the State Commission would not get involved; however, the Orange County Envir- onmental Coalition is opposed to both the five-point implementation plan and the proposals for Area Two, and they will automatically appeal to the State Commission any South Coast Regional Commission approval of a project in conformance to City regulations. The State Commission staff has indicated they will support Points 1 and 3 of our five-point implementation program and will recommend approval of appealed projects in conformance to these Specific Plans . The State staff has indicated that they wish to see a discontinuation of the present development trend (that is, duplexes, triplexes, and . fourplexes on a lot-by-lot basis) , and also wish to see regulatory provisions to provide for a new development trend that is charact- erized by extensive lot consolidation or reversion to acreage and higher densities. 6. 0 DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS IF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IS NOT SUCCESSFUL: 6 . 1 Option 1: Lower Density to Duplexes on 50 Foot Lots If the density is reduced to a maximum of two dwelling units per 50-foot lot, there would be no need for the parking court concept as all parking could be provided on site and still retain adequate open space. However, basic public improvements would still be necessary and would have to be implemented, either through financing Alternative I or II . A major disadvantage of this option is the lack of any incentive to consolidate lots . 6. 2 Option 2 : Provide for Extensive Lot Consolidation and Increased Density There are only two ways in which this option could be implemented: a. Provide substantial direct economic incentives (development write downs) or substantial density increases to encourage private market forces to advance beyond the present development cycle and institute a new development trend. b. The City could institute a Redevelopment Agency and embark upon a lot consolidation and public works improvement effort. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 10 Both alternatives in Option 2 have been rejEcted by Staff as being unfeasible. It is Staff ' s feeling that Huntington Beach citizens do not want increased density in this area, and the City is not in the. f.iScal position to offer the economic incentives necessary for the private sector to implement Option 2 . A3 for the other method of implementing this option, the City is focising its redevelopment efforts in the downtown area and institution of a redevelopment project here would only dilute those efforts . 7. 0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District is the Planning Department' s best effort to balance all factors that must be con- sidered in developing a comprehensive plan: environmental, physical, development capacity, economic, Coastal Commission, property owners, developers, and overall City concern. The Staff recommends adoption of the Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District when they come before the City Council. Staff further recommends Alternative III (B) as the method of financing. These recommendations are based on the following reasons : 1. Approval of both the Specific Plan and Assessment District are necessary for implementation of plan proposals. 2. An immediate upgrading of Area 2 will result. 3. The method of financing the plan balances financial responsi- bility between the City and property owners. FINANCING ALTERNATIVES: TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ALTERNATIVE I CONTINUE EXISTING SITUATION Standard Street Improvements - Major Items 50' Frontage Lot Interior Corner Street Removals 320. 00 1,160. 00 Street Paving 950. 00 3,100. 00 Curb and Gutter 200. 00 . 500. 00 Sidewalk 150. 00 420.00 Street Trees 150. 00 150. 00 Street Lighs (Average) 230. 00 230.00 Alley 350. 00 400. 00 Sewer Lateral 150. 00 150. 00 water Service 300. 00 300. 00 Storm Drains (or Fee) 500. 00 500. 00 3,300. 00 6, 910. 00 ALTERNATIVE II EXISTING IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS THROUGH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Same street improvements as Alternative I except by assessment district and adjustment (10%) for corner lot. Add 15% for incidental expenses. Interior Corner 4,850. 00 5,334. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 4 ,850.00 = 873,000 72 Corner Lots @ 5,334. 00 = 384, 000 1, 257 ,000 ALTERNATIVE III ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PER SPECIFIC PLAN Add to major items above the following: Page 2 Interior Corner Parking Court Concept 700. 00 700. 00 Stamped Concrete 100. 00 100. 00 Landscaping 100. 00 100. 00 Underground Edison 1,500. 00 1,500. 00 Underground Telephone 100. 00 100. 00 2,500. 00 2, 500. 00 Incidentals 15% 400. 00 400. 00 2, 900.00 2, 900. 00 Basic cost for assessment district 4 ,850. 00 5,334 .00 7 ,750. 00 8 ,234 . 00 180 Interior Lots @ 7 ,750 = 1, 395,000 72 Corner Lots @ 8 ,234 = 595, 000 2, 000, 000 ALTERNATIVE III A ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PER SPECIFIC PLAN Eliminate Underground Utilities @ 1, 600. 00/lot Interior Corner 6,150. 00 6,634. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 6, 150. 00 = 1,107,000 72 Corner Lots @ 6,634 .00 = 478, 000 1,585, 000 1 ALTERNATIVE III B SAME AS ALTERNATIVE IIIA AND ELIMINATE ARTERIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT C ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. 17th St. and Goldenwest @ 300. 00 per lot Palm and Orange @ 500. 00 per lot Interior Corner 5,350. 00 5,834. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 5,350. 00 = 963 , 000 72 Corner Lots @ 5, 834. 00 = 420, 000 1,383 , 000 COMPARATIVE ANNUAL PAYMENTS THROUGH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (20-YEAR PAYMENT PERIOD @ 7% INTEREST) ALTERNATIVE II Interior Lot @ $4,850 = $451 per annum Corner Lot @ $5, 334 = $496 per annum ALTERNATIVE III Interior Lot @ $7,750 = $720 per annum Corner Lot @ $8,234 = $760 per annum ALTERNATIVE III A Interior Lot @ $6 ,150 = $572 per annum Corner Lot @ $6 ,634 = $617 per annum ALTERNATIVE III B Interior Lot @ $5,350 - ;498 per annum Corner Lot @ $5, 834 - $543 per annum � TABLE SHOWING ANNUAL PAYMENTS AT SELECTED INTEREST AND BOND PAYMENT PERIODS PER $1,000 OF ASSESSMENT % Years Amount Annual Payment per 1,000 8% 15 1,000 115 8% 20 11000 100 8% 25 11000 93 7% 15 11000 108 7% 20 11000 93 7% 25 11000 85 COST TO CITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (4) 50' Corner Lots ) ) Includes senior citizens facility at (11) 50 ' Interior Lots ) 17th and Orange Alternative I 53, 940 Alternative II 75,000 Alternative III 118, 500 Alternative III A 94,186 Alternative III B 82, 186 City must pay total within 30 days of district formation. � - -� -2S • (ITY F HU�Tin � BEA P.O. BOX 190, CALIFORNIA 92648 * PLANNING DEPT. (714) 536-5271 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Department DATE: May 19, 1975 ATTN: David D. Rowlands, City Administrator C'6ZA �ixA RE: Townlot Assessment District 7301 The following documents and transmittals are submitted for your consideration in Townlot Assessment District 7301. 1. Summary Report: Townlot Specific Plan Area Two Ordinance and Townlot Assessment District 7301 2. Planning Commission Transmittal 3. Environmental Review Board Transmittal 4. Public Works Department Transmittal (Order of Procedure and Resolutions) 5. Letters of protest from property owners The Townlot Assessment District 7301 plans have been developed by the Public Works and Planning Department in conjunction with the Planning Commission. It is the recommendation of the Department of Public Works and Planning that the City Council approve formation of Townlot Assessment District 7301. Respectfully submitted, Richard A. Harlow Director of Planning and Environmental Resources 1-01 By: Edward D. Selich H. E. Hartge Planning Program Acbiinistrator Director of Public Works EDS:ja Attachments J� Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission DATE: May 19, 1975 ATTN: David D. Rowlands, City Administrator RE: TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 7301 Alhtough not specifically required in Assessment District proceedings, the Planning Commission feels a .responsibility to submit a recom- mendation to the City Council on Townlot Assessment District 7301. Over the past few years the Planning Commission has been intimately involved in developing plans for the parking court concept in the Townlot Area. The plansfor improvements are a direct result of many Planning Commission Study Sessions on this subject. At its May 6, 1975 meeting the Commission considered .the financing alternatives that had previously (May 5, 1975) been presented to the City Council. ON MOTION BY FINLEY AND SECOND BY PORTER THE COMMISSION ENDORSED MODIFIED ALTERNATIVE III (C) (MODIFIED -TO FINANCE ALL OR PART OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BY SOME OTHER METHOD THAN THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND VOTE: The Commission endorses the idea of undergrounding utilities as in the rest of the City. Possibly arterial street improvements can be accomplished in some other manner such as gas tax funds or HCD funding. AYES: Geiger, Bazil, Higgins, Kerins, Finley, Porter NOES: Slates ABSENT: None COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve formation of Townlot Assessment District 7301 with financing Alternative III (C) modified to finance all or part of the underground utilities by a means other than the Assessment District. Respectfully submitted, Richard A. Harlow Secretary By: IL , Edward D. Selich Acting Secretary EDS: ja • EnVIROnMEnTAL REVIEW BOARD J/ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH•CALIFORNIA �'- P.O. BOX 190 92648 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David Rowlands, Administrator FROM: Environmental Review Board DATE: May 15, 1975 SUBJECT: EIR 74-7 (Townlot Assessment District 73-01) Attached is the subject draft Environmental Impact Report and the addendum thereto.. These documents constitute the Final EIR for Assessment District No. 73-01. The public hearing for the draft EIR was held before the Environ- mental Review Board on February 18 , 1975. All comments received as the result of this public hearing and the review process have been addressed in the addendum to the draft report. EIR 74-7 was adopted by the Environmental Review Board on March 4 , 1975. Me v n A. 'TooZerl Acting etary Envi onmental Review Board :df SUMMARY REPORT TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TWO ORDINANCE and TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 73-01 May 5 , 1975 1. 0 INTRODUCTION : Although planning efforts in the Townlot area go back more than five years, the date most significant in this latest effort is September 24 , 1975. On that date a joint meeting was held between the City Council and the Planning Commission in response to diffi- culties experienced in processing City-approved projects in the Townlot area, and focused on resolving conflicts between the City and the South Coast Regional Commission. At that meeting, the status of the current General Plan Amendment for the Townlot area was presented and a five point implementation strategy proposed. Based on staff recommendations for the General Plan, the implementation strategy divided the Townlot area into five Specific Plan areas. The plan proposed in this report is Area Number Two as presented that evening. The General Plan Amendment was subsequently approved- on March 10 , 1975, and cleared the way for the implementation program. A draft report on the Townlot Specific Plan for Area Two and the Assessment District was prepared by the Planning Department Staff in October, 1974. It was distributed to property owners, builders , and other interested parties for review and comment. Also, Planning Commission study sessions were held on the document. A Specific Plan Ordinance was then proposed and the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 13, and April 15 , 1975. It is anticipated that the Planning Commission will adopt the ordinance at its May 6 , 1975 meeting. In conjunction with the Specific Plan effort, the Planning Depart- ment and Public Works Department have been developing the assess- ment district plans. The City Council, at the request of City Staff, set the Public hearing for the assessment district for May 19 , 1975. The intent of this report is to objectively set forth the essential information on the Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District necessary for the public hearings on the Assessment District and Specific Plan Ordinance on May 19 , 1975; indicate development options for this area if the assessment district -or specific plan is not successful; and present final staff recommendations on the assessment district and the specific plan. f- � Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 2 2. 0 PLAN DESCRIPTION The implementation plan for Area. Two is unique in that a Specific Plan Ordinance and .Assessment District are proposed as a hand-in- hand method of providing for development . in accordance with the General Plan. 2. 1 SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE: The Specific Plan Ordinance is a set of development regulations that obviate the base zoning district regulations. The specific plan itself becomes the zoning on property within its boundaries. In addition to regulation of private land development, the specific plan provides for public improvements that are in conformance to the design standards set forth in the assessment district. The Specific Plan regulations provide for: a. Uniform density provisions which are in conformance to the General Plan. b. Improved development standards,. including: (1) Increased on-site open space . (now called livability space) . (2) Increased flexibility in setbacks and other "building envelope" requirements to encourage better design. (3) Relief on the number of on-site parking spaces. requir:ed. C. Dens.ity incentives to consolidate lots; primarily. to the 100'. lot level and complete block. 2. 2 TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 73-01 The assessment district is a method of financing the public im- provements necessary to raise the existing conditions of public right-of-way to an acceptable level of service. In .addition, . it provides the necessary public .improvements to implement the parking court concept. Briefly, the assessment District provides for the following: a. Adjusting street grades for the parking courts. b. 'Curbs, gutters , sidewalks , and street paving. c.. Improvement of alleys. d. Street lighting and signs. e. Necessary- utility improvements:-- storm drains, .sewer laterals, and water service. f. Underground utilities: Edison lines and telephone. i Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 3. g. Aesthetic improvements, including: backbone landscaping of all streets not used, for parking courts; landscaping, irri- gation and stamped concrete in parking court cul-de-sacs ; and landscaping at parking entrances and islands along courts. 3. 0 PLAN NEEDS -STATEMENT. 3 . 1 Specific Plan Ordinance: The Specific Plan Ordinance is necessary to replace the outdated . . . . zoning district regulations for' this area. It provides for deve- lopment which is in conformance to the recently adopted General Plan (15 dwelling units per gross acre) . It also provides incen- tives to consolidate lots into- larger parcels , thereby increasing the development suitability of the parcel. The plan also satisfies the need to improve the quality of deve- lopment taking place in the area. By providing increased on-site open space and more flexible development standards, the plan will foster development that will provide a marked contrast to the presently developed units that cover much of the lot area with concrete and perpetuate .so-called "cookie-cutter" designs. 3. 2 Assessment District: With the sudden transition..of this area from oil production to residential development, there is a need to install public improve- ments that provide_. a level of service commensurate with City-wide standards. Furthermore, in order to implement the development regulations set forth in the specific plan, it is necessary to pro- vide for the "parking. court concept" - and associated improvements. As the Assessment District area continues to develop,_ the present practic of providing for off-site improvements as each lot develops will be;-- come unacceptable. Development will take place as market forces dis- tate, creating blocks in varying stages of development. With the area presently approximately. 20 percent developed, it will not be long before it will .be necessary to upgrade all public improvements to adequately service residents of the area. Thus, it is most desirable to provide for the improvements as a "unit and upgrade the entire- area at once. -This will not only raise the level of service, but will also provide an immediate aesthetic improvement to the area and to the_ image .of Huntington Beach. While it. is evident .that the public improvements are needed, the responsibility for financing must be determined. Presently, deve- lopers are contributing on a pay-as-you-go basis. The assessment district is a method whereby the major responsibility for financing the improvements would remain with the property owners and allow immediate upgrading. of the area. This is felt to be the most feasible method of financing.. e Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 4 4. 0 FINANCING ALTERNATIVES: ' TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 4. 1 Alternative I - Continue Existing Situation Standard Street Improvements - Major Items 50' Frontage Lot Interior . Corner Street Removals .320. 00 1,160. 00 Street Paving 950. 00 3,100. 00 Curb and Gutter '200.00 500. 00 Sidewalk 150. 00 420. 00 Street Trees 150. 00 150. 00 Street Lights (Average) `230. 00. _ 230. 00 Alley 350. 00 400. 00 Sewer Lateral .150. 00 15.0. 00 Water Service '300. 00 300. 00 Storm Drains (of fee) 500. 00 500. 00 3, 300. 00 6, 910. 00 4. 2 Alternative II - Existing Improvement Standards Through Assessment District Same street improvements as Alternative I , except by assessment district and adjustment (10%) for corner lot. Add 15 percent for incidental expenses. Interior Corner 4, 850. 00 5,334. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 4, 850. 00 = 873, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 5, 334. 00 = 384,000 1, 257, 000 Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 5 4. 3 Alternative III - Assessment District per Specific Plan Add to major items above the following: Interior Corner Parking Court Concept 700. 00 700. 00 Stamped Concrete 100. 00 100. 00 Landscaping 100. 00 100. 00 Underground Edison 1, 500. 00 1,500. 00 Underground Telephone 100. 00 100. 00 2, 500. 00 2, 500. 00 Incidentals (15%) 400. 00 400. 00 2, 900. 00 2, 900. 00 Basic Cost for Assessment District (Alternative II) 4, 850. 00 5, 334. 00 7, 750. 00 8, 234. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 7, 750 = 1, 395, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 8,234 = 595, 000 2,000, 000 4 . 4 Alternative III (A) - Assessment District per Specific Plan Eliminate underground utilities @ 1, 600. 00/lot. Interior Corner 6, 150. 00 6, 634. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 6,150. 00 = 1,107, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 6, 634. 00 = 478,000 1 , 585, 000 Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 6 4. 5 Alternative III (B) - Same as Alternative III (A) and Eliminate Arterial Street Improvement Costs from Assessment District 17th Street and Goldenwest @ 300. 00 per lot Palm and Orange Avenues @ 500. 00 per lot Interior Corner 5, 350. 00 5, 834. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 5, 350. 00 = 963,000 72 Corner Lots @ 5, 834. 00 = 420, 000 1, 383,000 4. 6 Alternative III (C) - Same as III, Except Arterial Street Improvement Costs are Eliminated from Assessment District Interior Corner 6, 950. 00 7, 434. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 6,950. 00 = 1, 251, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 7, 434. 00 = 535, 000 1, 786, 000 4. 7 Comparative Annual Payments Through Assessment District (20-Year Payment Period @ 7 Percent Interest ALTERNATIVE II Interior Lot .@ $4 , 850. 00 = $451. 00 per annum Corner Lot: @ 5, 334. 00 = 496. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III Interior Lot @ $7, 750. 00 = $720. 00 per annum Corner Lot. @ 8, 234. 00 = 760. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III (A) Interior Lot @ $6,150. 00 = $572. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 6, 634. 00 = 617. 00 per annum Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 7 ALTERNATIVE III (B) Interior Lot @ $5, 350. 00 = $498. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 5,834. 00 = 543. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III (C) Interior Lot @ $6, 950. 00 = $646. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 7,434. 00 = 691. 00 per annum 4. 8 Annual Payments at Selected Interest and Bond Payment Period per $1, 000 of Assessment Annual Payment Percent Years Amount Per 1, 000 8% 15 1, 000 115 8% 20 1, 000 100 8% 25 1, 000 93 7% 15 1, 000 108 7% 20 1, 000 93 7% 25 1, 000 85 4. 9 Cost to City to Participate in Assessment District Four 50 ' Corner Lots ) Includes Senior Citizens ' Facility at 17th and Orange Eleven 50 ' Interior Lots ) Alternative I - 53, 940 Alternative II - 75, 000 Alternative III - 118, 500 Alternative III (A) - 94 , 186 Alternative III (B) - 82 , 186 Alternative III (C) - 106 ,186 City must pay total within 30 days of district formation. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 8 5. 0 REACTION TO SPECIFIC PLAN: AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROPOSALS. 5. 1 Property Owner' s Reaction: To date, property owners representing approximately 20 percent of the land area have formally expressed opposition to the proposals. This opposition was expressed as follows: a. Testified at Planning Commission public hearings : March 13,. 1975: 5 property owners, . 46 net acres;. or 1. 4% of net land area. March 15, 1973: 2 property owners, . 60 net acres, or 1..8% of net land area. b. Signed petition circulated by Mr. Richard Wann: 22 property owners, 5. 67 net acres, or 16 . 7% of net land area. In addition, the major property owner in the plan area, the Hunt- ington Beach Company (12 acres, or 35% of net land area) has ex- pressed support for the project if costs are kept within $1 ,00 per square foot of net land area ($6 ,000. 00 *per 50 foot lot) . 5. 2 Builder' s Reaction: Although no formal position has been taken by the Huntington Beach Landowners Association or by other, builder organizations,. staff' s interpretation of their individual reactions can be summarized as follows : a. They concur with the assessment district if the costs are in line with benefits received. b. Their primary concern is for the City and Coastal Commission to come to terms so they are not caught in the middle. 5. 3 Coastal Commission: The State and South Coast Regional Commissions have taken different positions on the City' s five-point plan for the Townlot area. and the proposals for Area Two. The Regional Commission has expressed support for the proposed Spec- ific Plan and Assissment District for Area Two. They also support the five-point implementation strategy. P r av Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 9 The State Commission staff, however, does not support either the five- point strategy or the proposals for Area Two. Normally the State Commission would not get involved; however, the Orange County Envir- onmental Coalition is opposed to both the five-point implementation plan and the proposals for Area Two, and they will automatically appeal to the State Commission any South Coast Regional Commission approval of a project in conformance to City regulations. The State Commission staff has indicated they will support Points 1 and 3 of our five-point implementation program and will recommend approval of appealed projects in conformance to these Specific Plans . The State staff has indicated that they wish to see a discontinuation of the present development trend (that is, duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes on a lot-by-lot basis) , and also wish to see regulatory provisions to provide for a new development trend that is charact- erized by extensive lot consolidation or reversion to acreage and higher densities. 6. 0 DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS IF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IS NOT SUCCESSFUL: 6 . 1 Option 1: Lower Density to Duplexes on 50 Foot Lots If the density is reduced to a maximum of two dwelling units per 50-foot lot, there would be no need for the parking court concept as all parking could be provided on site and still retain adequate open space. However, basic public improvements would still be necessary and would have to be implemented, either through financing Alternative I or II . A major disadvantage of this option is the lack of any incentive to consolidate lots. 6. 2 Option 2 : Provide for Extensive Lot Consolidation and Increased Density There are only two ways in which this option could be implemented: a. Provide substantial direct economic incentives (development write downs) or substantial density increases to encourage private market forces to advance beyond the present development cycle and institute a new development trend. b. The City could institute a Redevelopment Agency and embark upon a lot consolidation and public works improvement effort. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 10 Both alternatives in Option 2 have - been rejected by Staff as being unfeasible. It is Staff's feeling that Huntington Beach citizens do not want increased density in this area, and the City is not in the fiscal position to offer the economic incentives necessary for the private sector to implement Option 2. As for the other method of implementing this option, the City is focusing its redevelopment efforts in the downtown area and institution of a redevelopment project here would only dilute those efforts . 7. 0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District is the Planning Department' s best -effort to balance all factors that must be con- sidered in developing a comprehensive plan: environmental, physical, development capacity, economic, Coastal Commission, property owners, developers, and overall City concern. The Staff recommends adoption of the Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District when they come before the City Council. Staff further recommends Alternative III (B) as the method of financing. These recommendations are based on the following reasons: 1. Approval of both the Specific Plan and Assessment District are necessary for implementation of plan proposals. 2. An immediate upgrading of Area 2 will result. 3. The method of financing the plan balances financial responsi- bility between the City and property owners. 9 • 1 O _ 111HIP11of l r 100, - - - - ) - ® i g ® PROPOIED Af/E//MEnT DI/TRICT Town LOT AREA Primary Circulation e Secondary Circulation CIRCULATION Emergency Vehicles hvrr�a 1974 r. — —_ 1 -oft - - - Street Lights m PROPO/ED AffEffMEnT DIITRICT TO n LOT AREA Q Street Signs UTILITIES -Storm Drain Trunklin t� r rTelephone&Electric 7EPT8MR 1974 Undergrounding y I: i is ------------ TTTPI ® m OF OF ® PROPOIED AllE/fMEnT DIITRICT low 1 LOT AREA R, landscaping• street section lEPTEIII6ER 1974 SUMMARY REPORT TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TWO ORDINANCE and TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 73-01 May 5 , 1975 1. 0 INTRODUCTION: Although planning efforts in the Townlot area go back more than five years , the date most significant in this latest effort is September 24 , 1975. On that date a joint meeting was held between the City Council and the Planning Commission in response to diffi- culties experienced in processing City-approved projects in the Townlot area, and focused on resolving conflicts between the City and the South Coast Regional Commission. At that meeting, the status of the current General Plan Amendment for the Townlot area was presented and a five point implementation strategy proposed. Based on staff recommendations for the General Plan, the implementation strategy divided the Townlot area into five Specific Plan areas. The plan proposed in this report is Area Number Two as presented that evening. The General Plan Amendment was subsequently approved on March 10 , 1975, and cleared the way for the implementation program. A draft report on the Townlot Specific Plan for Area Two and the Assessment District was prepared by the Planning Department Staff in October, 1974. It was distributed to property owners, builders, and other interested parties for review and comment. Also, Planning Commission study sessions were held on the document. A Specific Plan Ordinance was then proposed and the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 13, and April 15 , 1975. It is anticipated that the Planning Commission will adopt the ordinance at its May 6 , 1975 meeting. In conjunction with the Specific Plan effort, the Planning Depart- ment and Public Works Department have been developing the assess- ment district plans. The City Council, at the request of City Staff , set the Public hearing for the assessment district for May 19 , 1975. The intent of this report is to objectively set forth the essential information on the Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District necessary for the public hearings on the Assessment District and Specific Plan Ordinance on May 19 , 1975; indicate development options for this area if the assessment district -or specific plan is not successful; and present final staff recommendations on the assessment district and the specific plan. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 2 2. 0 PLAN DESCRIPTION The implementation plan for Area. Two 'is unio_ue in that a Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District are proposed as a hand-in- hand method of providing for development in accordance with the General Plan. 2. 1 SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE: The Specific Plan 'Ordinance is a set of development regulations that obviate the base zoning district regulations. The specific plan itself becomes the zoning on property within its boundaries. In addition to regulation of private land development, the specific plan provides for public improvements that are in conformance to the design standards set forth in the assessment district. The Specific Plan regulations provide for: a. Uniform density provisions which are in conformance to the General Plan. b. Improved development standards, including: (1) Increased on-site open space (now called livability space) . (2) Increased flexibility in setbacks and other "building envelope" requirements to encourage better design. (3) Relief on the number of on-site parking spaces required. C. Density incentives to consolidate lots; primarily. to the 100'. lot level and complete block. 2. 2 TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 73-01 . The assessment district is a method of financing the public im- provements necessary to raise the existing conditions of. public right-of-way to an- acceptable level of service. In addition, it provides the necessary public .improvements to implement the parking court concept. Briefly, the assessment District provides for _the following: a. Adjusting street grades for the parking courts. b. 'Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and street paving. c.. Improvement of alleys. d. Street lighting and signs. - e. Necessary- utility improvements: storm dr.ains; .sewer laterals, and water service. f. Underground utilities: Edison - lines and telephone. f Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 3 g. Aesthetic improvements, including: backbone landscaping of all streets not used for parking courts; landscaping, irri- gation and stamped concrete in parking court cul-de-sacs; and landscaping at parking entrances and islands along courts. 3. 0 PLAN NEEDS .STATEMENT: 3 . 1 Specific Plan Ordinance: The Specific Plan Ordinance is necessary to replace the outdated zoning district regulations for this area. It provides for deve- lopment which is in conformance to the recently adopted General Plan (15 dwelling units per gross acre) . It also provides incen- tives to consolidate lots into larger parcels , thereby increasing the development suitability of the parcel. The plan also satisfies the need to improve the quality of deve- lopment taking place in the area. By providing increased on-site open space and more flexible development standards, the plan will foster development that will provide a marked contrast to the presently developed units that cover much of the lot area with concrete and perpetuate so-called "cookie-cutter" designs. 3. 2 Assessment District: With the sudden transition of this area from oil production to residential development, there is a need to install public improve- ments that provide a level of service commensurate with City-wide standards . Furthermore, in order to implement the development regulations set forth in the specific plan, it is necessary to pro- vide for the "parking court concept" and associated improvements. As the Assessment District area continues to develop, the present practi of providing for off-site improvements as each lot develops will be- come unacceptable. Development will take place as market forces dis- tate, creating blocks in varying stages of development. With the area presently approximately 20 percent developed, it will not be long before it will be necessary to upgrade all public improvements to adequately service residents of the area. Thus, it is most desirable to provide for the improvements as a unit and upgrade the entire area at once. This will not only raise the level of service, but will also provide an immediate aesthetic improvement to the area and to the image of Huntington Beach. While it is evident that the public improvements are needed, the responsibility for financing must be determined. Presently, deve- lopers are contributing on a pay-as-you-go basis . The assessment district is a method whereby the major responsibility for financing the improvements would remain with the property owners and allow immediate upgrading of the area. This is felt to be the most feasible method of financing. - A Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 4 4. 0 FINANCING ALTERNATIVES: TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 4. 1 Alternative I - Continue Existing Situation Standard Street Improvements - Major Items 50' Frontage Lot Interior Corner Street Removals 320. 00 1,160. 00 Street Paving 950. 00 3,100. 00 Curb and Gutter 200. 00 500. 00 Sidewalk 150. 00 420. 00 Street Trees 150. 00 150. 00 Street Lights (Average) 230. 00 230. 00 Alley 350. 00 400. 00 Sewer Lateral 150. 00 150. 00 Water Service 300. 00 300. 00 Storm Drains (of fee) 500. 00 500. 00 3, 300. 00 6, 910. 00 4. 2 Alternative II - Existing Improvement Standards Through Assessment District Same street improvements as Alternative I, except by assessment district and adjustment (10%) for corner lot. Add 15 percent for incidental expenses. Interior Corner 4, 850. 00 5, 334. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 4, 850. 00 = 873, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 5, 334. 00 = 384 ,000 1,257, 000 Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 5 4. 3 Alternative III - Assessment District per Specific Plan Add to major items above the following: Interior Corner Parking Court Concept 700. 00 700. 00 Stamped Concrete 100. 00 100. 00 Landscaping 100. 00 100. 00 Underground Edison 1,500. 00 1,500. 00 Underground Telephone 100. 00 100. 00 2, 500. 00 2, 500. 00 Incidentals (15%) 400. 00 400. 00 2,900. 00 2,900. 00 Basic Cost for Assessment District (Alternative II) 4,850. 00 5, 334. 00 7,750. 00 8,234. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 7, 750 = 1, 395, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 8,234 = 595, 000 2,000,000 4. 4 Alternative III (A) - Assessment District per Specific Plan Eliminate underground utilities @ 1, 600. 00/lot. Interior Corner 6, 150. 00 6, 634. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 6,150. 00 = 1,107, 000 72 Corner Lots @ 6, 634. 00 = 478,000 1 , 585, 000 Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 6 4. 5 Alternative III (B) - Same as Alternative III (A) and Eliminate Arterial Street Improvement Costs from Assessment District 17th Street and Goldenwest @ 300. 00 per lot Palm and Orange Avenues @ 500. 00 per lot Interior Corner 5,350. 00 5,834. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 5,350. 00 = 963,000 72 Corner Lots @ 5,834. 00 = 420, 000 1, 383,000 4. 6 Alternative III (C) - Same as III, Except Arterial Street Improvement Costs- are Eliminated from Assessment District Interior Corner 6,950. 00 7, 434. 00 180 Interior Lots @ 6, 950. 00 = 1,251, 000 72 Corner Lots @ . 7, 434. 00 = 535, 000 1,786, 000 4. 7 Comparative Annual Payments Through Assessment District (20-Year Payment Period @ 7 Percent Interest ALTERNATIVE II Interior 'Lot .@ $4, 850. 00' _ $451. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 5, 334. 00 = 496. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III Interior Lot @ $7, 750. 00 = $720. 00 per 'annum Corner Lot @ 8,234. 00 = 760. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III (A) Interior Lot @ $6,150. 00. _ $572. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 6, 634. 00 = 617. 00 per annum Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 7 ALTERNATIVE III (B) Interior Lot @ $5, 350. 00 = $498. 00 per annum Corner Lot @ 5,834. 00 = 543. 00 per annum ALTERNATIVE III (C) Interior Lot @ $6, 950. 00 = $646.00 per annum Corner Lot @ 7,434. 00 = 691. 00 per annum 4. 8 Annual Payments at Selected Interest and Bond Payment Period per $1, 000 of Assessment Annual Payment Percent Years Amount Per 1, 000 8% 15 1, 000 115 8% 20 1,000 100 8% 25 1, 000 93 7% 15 1, 000 108 7% 20 1,000 93 7% 25 1, 000 85 4. 9 Cost to City to Participate in Assessment District Four 50 ' Corner Lots ) Includes Senior Citizens ' Facility at 17th and Orange Eleven 50 ' Interior Lots ) Alternative I - 53, 940 Alternative II - 75, 000 Alternative III - 118, 500 Alternative III (A) - 94 , 186 Alternative III (B) - 82 , 186 Alternative III (C) - 106 ,186 City must pay total within 30 days of district formation. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 8 5. 0 REACTION TO SPECIFIC PLAN AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROPOSALS. 5. 1 Property Owner' s Reaction: To. date, property owners representing approximately 20 percent of the land area have formally expressed opposition to the proposals. This opposition was expressed as follows: a. Testified at Planning Commission public hearings : March 13, 1975: 5 property owners, . 46 net acres , or 1. 4% of net land area. March 15, 1973: 2 property owners, . 60 net acres, or 1. 8% of net land area. b. Signed petition circulated by Mr. Richard Wann: 22 property owners, 5. 67 net acres, or 16. 7% of net land area. In addition, the major property owner in the plan area, the Hunt- ington Beach Company (12 acres , or '35% of net land area) has ex- pressed support for the project if 'costs are kept within $1 ,00 per square foot of net land area ($6 ,000. 00 , per 50 foot lot) . 5. 2 Builder's Reaction: Although no formal position has been taken by the Huntington Beach Landowners Association or by other builder organizations, staff' s interpretation of their individual reactions can be summarized as follows : a. They concur with the assessment district if the costs are in line with benefits received. b. Their primary concern is for the City and Coastal Commission to come to terms so they are not eaught 'in the middle. 5. 3 Coastal Commission The State and South Coast Regional Commissions have taken different positions on the City' s five-point plan for the Townlot area_ and the proposals for Area Two. The Regional Commission has expressed support for the proposed Spec- ific Plan and Assissment District for Area Two. They also support the five-point implementation strategy. c: Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 9 . The State Commission staff, however, does not support either the five- point strategy or the proposals for Area Two. Normally the State Commission would not get involved; however, the Orange County Envir- onmental Coalition is opposed to both the five-point implementation plan and the proposals for Area Two, and. they will automatically appeal to the State Commission any South Coast Regional Commission approval of a project in conformance to City regulations. The State Commission staff has indicated they will support Points 1 and 3 of our. five-point implementation.. program and. will recommend approval of appealed projects in conformance to these Specific Plans . The State staff has indicated that they wish to see a. discontinuation .. of the present development trend (that is, duplexes, triplexes,. and fourplexes on a lot-by-lot basis) , and also. wish to see regulatory provisions to provide fora new development trend that is..charact- erized by extensive lot consolidation. or reversion to acreage and. higher densities. 6. 0 DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS IF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IS NOT SUCCESSFUL: 6 . 1 Option - li Lower Density to Duplexes on 50 Foot Lots If the density is reduced to a maximum of two dwelling units per 50-foot lot, there would 'be no need for the parking court concept as .all parking could be provided on site and still retain adequate open space. However, basic public improvements -would still be necessary and would have to be implemented, either through financing Alternative I or II . A major disadvantage of this option is the lack of any incentive to consolidate lots. 6. 2 Option 2 : Provide -for Extensive Lot Consolidation and Increased Density . . There are only two ways in which this option could be implemented: a. Provide substant.ial .direct economic incentives (development write downs) or substantial density increases to encourage private market forces to advance beyond the present development cycle and institute a new development .trend. b. The _City could institute a Redevelopment Agency and embark upon a lot consolidation and public -works improvement effort. Townlot Specific Plan Ordinance Page 10 Both alternatives in Option 2 have been rejected by Staff as being unfeasible. It is Staff's feeling that Huntington Beach citizens do not want increased density in this area, and the City- is not in the fiscal position to offer the economic incentives necessary for the private sector to implement Option 2. As for the other method of implementing this option, the City is focusing its redevelopment efforts in the downtown area and institution of a redevelopment project here .would only dilute those efforts. i 7. 0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District is the Planning Department' s best effort to balance all factors that must be con- sidered in developing a comprehensive plan: environmental, physical, development capacity, economic, Coastal Commission, property owners, developers, and overall City concern. The Staff recommends adoption of the Specific Plan Ordinance and Assessment District when they come before the City Council. Staff further recommends Alternative III (B) as the method of financing. These recommendations are based on: the following reasons: 1. Approval of both the Specific Plan and Assessment District are necessary for implementation of plan proposals. 2. An immediate upgrading of Area 2 will result. 3. The method of financing the plan balances financial responsi- bility between the City and property owners. ri • • • 9WM r-7- L--6 I acarc10 *-M iiiii.M Elie'M'MM n M Toll.� - : - _ I- F I�I i i l I i ii FF _ I - of 100 ® PROPOfED AffEffMEnT DIITRICT Town LOT AREA - Primary Circulation Secondary Circulation CIRCULATION Emergency Vehicles rtvrdrmER tV7I - I i LIN i _ • 1 - it -- - �- - ii At AIA: ` 11MM1.11 1 _ 77 - of ioo .. .......... 7. _. ® Street Lights PROPO/ED AIIEffMEnT DIITRICT • mwn LOT AREA Q Street Signs UTILITIES ®Storm Drain Trunkline M =Telephone&Electric APTERBiER 1974 Undergrounding 77"1111 .oxuu meeio is em euuw� 71 F1 /e wua..eam m o.�.a see4 .a�LLw mwus�a nee eaaaen� s owuw seas m a.sia.nwaawar nsv emmraw mraena'Li. } I, • c ew r ® m oos•++e4e w•eur,ea PROPOIED Ad/E//IEnT DIdTRICT TOM LOT AREA 1 o®�,d capes a section /EPTHIIBE&.1474 !x ..7.' '�`ti�a"" "f F, W"4 s � ,w '� vz.•'".y i ,,� W,.,'a59 y '+,.. ,�•�`$ �n #'u;j1i •m;.. .��c � - -. .�r.,.. .,,•{ � �r .� �x, .:" .,.Y � NPF.. ; '4J a ?�'�Y +� Y 5., ..:•' t3i�x '.:`� � •`.r§3+X s.,, �.9 r+r +1F',lb f. ',' x ,.", jyR;,,:^, ''. 'r.' `�'; 't-�, :'eaSV�fc„ 3C.";t r ��.. ;r M1,"y* e,a, ' ... ��'*s,.', ��, 'A:'►$, ��. M.,. ..r': .^• rz r� .. �,re;.. C..,d � %'„"k:. y.'.Z. !r5':+',.. '�'. �•,' :'R .K2 as .ue+, rR,'i +�+, +4�.� � ,ri..�p��cie `� i'.�.{,:i► / F:.°: M ?� ^�.' �r?. �` '��•<A.r. �i�.. �.§ " ,'t � ..,.. .,. �. � � ,� '?.C.'�(. 7.rd. 1 '�a :: L'"iFY�.�a,t a'R�'�y •'.�.� �� :,.+" „':. 'a,^, r ... ..rd� x . City ®f Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT May 12, 1975 DO � .Honorable Mayor MAY 1 1975 and City Council CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Huntington Beach ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Attention: David D. Rowlands City Administrator Subject: Assessment District No. 7301 (Town Lot Assessment District) Gentlemen: The following assessment district documents are hereby transmitted for your review and appropriate action: 1. Order of Procedure for public hearing 2. Resolution Ordering Changes and Modifications 3. Resolution Making Findings and Determinations t The public hearing for this district should be conducted v in the sequency as set forth in the document titled Order of Procedure. Upon completion of the public hearing on May 19 ,. 1975, the adoption of the above resolutions are necessary in order to proceed with the Town Lot district. It is recommended that your Honorable Body approve the resolutions and direct the Mayor and City Clerk to execute them. Very truly yours, /eE.___HarJ0 e Director of Public Works HEH•WEH:ae Trans. ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: May 19 , 1975 - 7 :00 o'clock PM MAYOR: Announce that this is the time and place for the public hearing to determine whether or not the council should proceed with the formation of the special assessment district in what is designated ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESS- MENT DISTRICT) . CLERK: Announce that notice of this public hearing has been given as designated and that the following affidavits are on file in his office: a. Affidavit of Publication b. Certificate of Mailing C. Certificate of Posting Streets STAFF AND CONSULTANTS : Explain general nature and extent of proposed works of improvement and boundaries of the district. Explain procedures to be followed under special assessment district financing. CLERK: Announce number of written protests received and read protests in full OR Announce that copies have been delivered to each member of the Council. MAYOR: Ask first to hear from those who have filed protests. MAYOR: Ask to hear from. anyone else who wishes to speak for or against the works of improvement as proposed. CITY COUNCIL: Discussion and consideration of possible changes and modifications to works of improvement and proceedings. CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS. CITY COUNCIL: By motion, declare the public hear- ing closed. CITY COUNCIL: By motion, overrule and deny all protests . CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY. r' 1 RESOLUTION NO. Q RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AS PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, this City Council has adopted a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination relating to certain public works of improve- ment in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) ; and, WHEREAS, at this time, said City Council has held and conducted a public hearing on the proposed works of improvement and is desirous at this time to order certain changes and modifications to be made in the works of improvement as proposed to be constructed under said proceed- ings; and, WHEREAS , it appears to this Council that said changes and modifications are in the best public benefit and should be so ordered to be made at this time, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That the public interest, convenience and necessity require and this City Council hereby orders , certain changes and modifi- cations to be made in the works of improvement as proposed to be con- structed under these proceedings, all as said amendments and modifications are shown on an attached Exhibit "A" hereby referenced, attached, and incorporated. SECTION 3 . That the Director of Public Works is hereby ordered to make the above changes and modifications on the. map as previously presented and said changes and modifications are for the best interests of the property owners within the assessment district. ` APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1975. . MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA �ov, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said city, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the day of 1975 , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES : COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: DATED this day of 1975. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA r I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said city, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the day of 1975 , by the following vote: AYES : COUNCILMEN: NOES : COUNCILMEN: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: DATED this day of , 1975. f CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. VO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CHANGES AND .MODIFICATIONS TO THE WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AS PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS , this City Council has adopted a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination relating to certain public works of improve- ment in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) ; and, WHEREAS , at this time, said City Council has held and conducted a public hearing on the proposed works of improvement and is desirous at this time to order certain changes and modifications to be made in the works of improvement as proposed to be constructed under said proceed- ings; and, WHEREAS , it appears to this Council that said changes and modifications are in the best public benefit and should be so ordered to be made at this time, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That the public interest, convenience and necessity require and this City Council hereby orders , certain changes and modifi- cations to be made in the works of improvement as proposed to be con- structed under these proceedings , all as said amendments and modifications are shown on an attached Exhibit "A" hereby referenced, attached, and incorporated. SECTION 3 . That the Director of Public Works is hereby ordered to make the above changes and modifications on the map as previously presented and said changes and modifications are for the best interests of the property owners within the assessment district. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1975 . . MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said city , do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the day of 1975 , by the following vote: AYES : COUNCILMEN: NOES : COUNCILMEN: ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: DATED this day of 1975. I i CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA l! I ij 1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND FURTHER DECLARING THAT THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMI- TATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931" SHALL NOT APPLY TO SAID PROCEEDINGS. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, this City Council has established a procedure for the conduct of a public hearing, pursuant to Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California, and as authorized by Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the purpose of determining whether special assessment district proceed- ings should be held without further compliance with the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931; " and, WHEREAS , said proceedings are applicable to a Charter City and said City is a Charter City and has complied with the provisions of said Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing, for which reasonable notice has been given in the manner and form as prescribed by law, and this City Council has heard and considered all the evidence, both oral and written, relative to the public convenience and necessity for the construction of the pub- lic works of improvement in the special assessment district, to be known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) ; and, WHEREAS , this City Council is satisfied as to the works of improvement as proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That this City Council hereby finds and determines that the public convenience `and necessity require the works of improve- ment as now proposed to be constructed in a special assessment district hereinafter known and designated as -ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWN- LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) . SECTION 3 . That this City Council hereby further determines that the provisions and limitations of the "Special Assessment Investi- gation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, " shall not be applicable to the proceedings for this improvement. c-� SECTION 4. That the Director of Public Works and the staff shall proceed with the formation of a special assessment district for the above-referenced works of improvement, and as soon as convenient, a Resolution of Intention shall be presented to this City Council for consideration. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1975. MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City :-Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the day of 1975, by the following vote: AYES : COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: DATED this day of 1975. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND FURTHER DECLARING THAT THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMI- TATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931" SHALL NOT APPLY TO SAID PROCEEDINGS . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. '7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS , this City Council has established a procedure for the conduct of a public hearing, pursuant to Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California, and as authorized by Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the purpose of determining whether special assessment district proceed- ings should be held without further compliance with the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931; " and, WHEREAS, said proceedings are applicable to a Charter City and said City is a Charter City and has complied with the provisions of said Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California; and, WHEREAS , a public hearing, for which reasonable notice has been given in the manner and form as prescrib9d by law, and this City Council has heard and considered all the evidence, both oral and written, relative to the public convenience and necessity for the construction of the pub- lic works of improvement in the special assessment district, to be known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) ; and, WHEREAS , this City Council is satisfied as to the works of improvement as proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That this City Council hereby finds and determines that the public convenience- and necessity require the works of improve- ment as now proposed to be constructed in a special assessment district hereinafter known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWN- LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) . SECTION 3 . That this City Council hereby further determines that the provisions and limitations of the "Special Assessment Investi- gation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, " shall not be applicable to the proceedings for this improvement. r SECTION 4 . That the Director of Public Works and the staff shall proceed with the formation of a special assessment district for y the above-referenced works of improvement, and as soon as convenient, 1 a Resolution of Intention shall be presented to this City Council for consideration. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1975. MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA i f I r i -2- STATE OF- CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss . } CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the day of 1975 , by the following vote: AYES : COUNCILMEN: NOES : COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: DATED this day of 1975. i CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA I i ,J RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND FURTHER DECLARING THAT THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMI- TATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931" SHALL NOT APPLY TO SAID PROCEEDINGS. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS , this City Council has established a procedure for the conduct of a public hearing, pursuant to Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California, .and as authorized by Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the purpose of determining whether special assessment district proceed- ings should be held without further compliance with the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931; " and, WHEREAS, said proceedings are applicable to a Charter City and said City is a Charter City and has complied with the provisions of said Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California; and, WHEREAS , a public hearing, for which reasonable notice has been given in the manner and form as prescribed by law, and this City Council has heard and considered all the evidence, both oral and written, relative to the public convenience and necessity for the construction of the pub- lic works of improvement in the special assessment district, to be known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) ; and, WHEREAS , this City Council is satisfied as to the works of improvement as proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That this City Council hereby finds and determines that the public convenience and necessity require the works of improve- ment as now proposed to be constructed in a special assessment district hereinafter known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWN- LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) . SECTION 3 . That this City Council hereby further determines that the provisions and limitations of the "Special Assessment Investi- gation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, " shall not be applicable to the proceedings for this improvement. J' SECTION 4 . That the Director of Public Works and the staff shall proceed with the formation of a special assessment district for I the above-referenced works of improvement, and as soon as convenient, I a Resolution of Intention shall be presented to this City Council for L._ consideration. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1975 . MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: i CITY CLERK OF THE' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 1 i I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington . Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the day of 1975, by the following vote: AYES : COUNCILMEN: NOES : COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: DATED this day of 1975. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 0 . e a 113 Via Venezia ;M�.f:A A CH+CI.I.IF. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 NUt�'• :; .� May 6th, .1975 City Clerk Huntington Beach 2000 Plain Street Huntington Beach, Calif. Dear City Clerk and Honorable members of the City Counoll: I am the Owner of 2 lots--Lot 9 and 11 In Block 421. I have read the information on ' ASSESSNIENT DISTRICT #7301 , Resolution 4067 and cannot see the need of any of the improve- ments except resurfacing the streets. In fact, . some of the plans do not seem logical. I attended two of the Planning Commission meetings and heard no one in the audience speak for this Townlot Plan, and I am wondering; who these expensive constructions are going to benefit. Is it not possible for the members of the City Coupcil to study this plan, and .for each member to drive through the area slowly; keeping In mind how it would be if these wide streets were simply resurfaced. Very truly yours, Louise J. Woolsey �rP 2- 3 I Louise J . 19001sey _ . 113 Via Venezia ' ` xTewport Beahi,, Calif. 9R6�60 -;A Lexington&Concord 1775 by Sandham US Bicentennial IOcents City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 luain Street Huntington Beach, "alif. 92648 I WOOLSEY, NEWELL & THATCHER = RE'C!VED .7rg C.'T_ E_RF. j=. LAWYERS r';ry rC" ROY B. WOOLSEY H U N T I H C TiJ??.r.;(, 1,�4f'I ODE 714 2099 SAN JOAOUIN HILLS ROAD RICHARD A.NEWELL 640-0800 ROBERT L.THATCHER NEWPORT CENTER NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 Pil : 5 0 May 5, 1975 D Huntington Beach City Council MAY G 1975 City of Huntington Beach DITY OF. HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Proposed Assessment District No. 7301 ; My Lots 13 and 15 in Block 421 on May 19 , 1975 Calendar; Assessor' s Parcel No . 023-122-05, Volume 127 , Page 412, Ck. 4 V Gentlemen: I and my wife own subject lots in subject proposed district no. 7301. We hereby object to the subject assessment district and call your attention to the following: 1) Many long years ago the City accepted the subdivision of subject lots and the dedication of streets and various eastments in subject area including 21st Street between Orange and Pecan. In 1969 in reliance upon the City' s having accepted the dedication of the streets , we bought Lots 13 and 15 above named. The streets were dilapidated because the City failed to maintain them. While the City was collecting taxes from subject lots and from the oil produced on subject lots , it was using City funds for the maintenance of other streets in Huntington Beach which were developed for commercial or residential use and let subject property go. After years of taking our taxes and letting the streets go so that they are in very poor condition, the City should repave the streets . Also, you accepted the dedication of the streets and we relied on your acceptance of them in buying the property. 2) On-street parking will depreciate the potential value of the property and prevent the growth in values . On-street parking attracts people who are less likely to keep up their cars and Huntington Beach City Council May 5 , 1975 Page 2 their premises . Junkers will be left on the street to the detriment of the property owners . The trend in recent years has been to require more off-street (on site) parking and covered or garaged parking. Your plan to permit on-street parking is a step backwards . 3) The closing of roads and making of cul de sacs is an added expense. This is already developed property already laid out. The cul de sacs are a developer-type expense which should not be forced upon property owners . If the City wanted cul de sacs there the City should have required the original development of cul de sacs at which time they could have been done much less expensively than after the streets have been improved and dedicated. I attended several of the hearings before the Planning Commission on subject proposal. One of the questions raised by the staff;a so-called traffic problem. I have been in the area several times and there is no traffic problem. In the more sophisticated analysis of this problem on April 15, 1975, the staff completely contradicted the traffic-problem argument and stated "the street system and utility capacities adequately handling the additional dwelling units and people" , referring to the units and people contemplated under the proposed plan. 4) The April 15, 1975, Planning Department memo says that the district financing is proper because otherwise the financing will impact other financial responsibilities the City has and if the City does not use the assessment district, the alternative financing may be a precedent which would obligate the City in other areas . The fact is that this area has already borne the cost of initial development. The subdivider was required to put in streets , curbs , gutters and sidewalks which the City accepted. The City has taken taxes derived from this area and spent it on other areas in the City. It is now only fair that the City re-grade at the City' s expense the streets involved. The sidewalks may be the responsibility of the adjoining property owner but certainly the streets are not. Funds derived from these properties have been used to grade and keep up other streets while the streets in the subject area have been left to deteriorate. 5) On-street parking will result in inadequate street sweeping. If the street parking is necessary, cars will not be moved for the street sweeper. Very truly yours , ROY B. W)0 EY RBW:pb If WOOLSEY, NEWELL & THATCHER < ,14 , 'ti LAWYERS2099 SAN JOAOUIN HILLS ROAD --Salem P cpn�soree,s NEWPORT CENTER "'+ti_,�✓ - NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 Huntington Beach City Council City of Huntington Beach Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 I HRRRG HOB RRI PRIHTIHG 613 Seventeenth Street - Huntington Beach - 536-6908 May 8, 1975 City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach RE: Assessment District No. 7301 (Townlot Assessment District) Relative to your Notice of Hearing to be held on Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975, we wish to enter this written protest to any such proposal concerning our property located at 613-615 17th Street. We are operating a print shop at 613 17th Street and at no time during the anticltiatbd life of the building will such landscaping improvements benefit us. G1e strongly object to any additional cost to this property. Very truly yours, 0�- ��-If Helen and Harry Robinson �* z M. M z tc n ti-'�C7rn n�rrr< �O +• r HARRY ROBINSON, Printing I • Post Office Box 66 Huntington Beach, California 92648 �(�N E'F � r? Al"Y pM I I Office of the City Clerk ' City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 e g �j THE Farmers Insurance Group OF COMPANIES EILEEN ARNOLD 324 Main Street Post Office Box 228 Huntington Beach, California 92648 May 5, 1975 Bus: 536-1414 Res: 536-3835 City of Huntington Beach r CCity L r Huntington 1Beach, Calif. kUrrrrct�:N `�cr,.CA !.10, Re: Assessment District No. 7301 Property Location: 3 unit apartment 7 � � 609 - 19th St . , H.B. � ` 8 . Gentlemen: Please be advised that I am opposed to the special assessment on this district . I agree some work needs to be done but the plan as proposed is far to elaborate and expensive . Paving of streets and alleys, with the installation of curbs and- gutters for those lots that have not been improved, is all that is necessary. At least part of that expense should be paid from the general fund. Property owners in this area have paid taxes for many years with that money paid being used for improvements throughout the city. Underground utilities are unnecessary, all of the cul-de-sacs are unnecessary, (Palm Ave . acts as deterrent to beach traffice on these streets ) , new landscaping is unnecessary, and for the property owners in this assessment district to pay for work on any arterial streets is unfair. I respectfully request that the City Council consider an alter- nate plan for this district. Yours truly, Dorothy E. Arnold Owner; also shown as Eileen S. Arnold, a widow de a/bw FAST, FAIR, FRIENDLY SERVICE i' '.FARMERS INSURANCE GROUPa�//r/ � : EILEEN ARNOLD 324 Main Street Post Office Box 228 Huntington Beach, California 92648 I City Clerk City of Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 i 0 1 � CLERX '88 EACH,CALIF. twy i ` oe- 000 611-ooclt 00, i i / ' f - iR - �f • ' • • • • . • s _ o •� • • • Aa d:3-, ia _aq zzc > '97S NO 44,A �, No . l Ltd a F fa /y/ �� cow„G ems eep-G � "ter A� o/ o on kr &r �, � ✓mot . Y� w��`�"� ,sus. l� � � I J Wp,4l, P F"'. 317� ►g of ,,,��: Guy C � Ob O � CiitJ cJ Dear Mr. Miller, 9�5 As a property owner in the townlot assessment district I would like to go on record as being against any parking court concept and against any other additional improvements because they are unnecessary and according to the proposal they would be outrageously expensive. I would like to continue the existing conditions and have developers pay as they go, as they have in the past. Thomas K. Johnson owner 609 = 20th Street Property description: Lots 9 and 11 in Block 620 of " Huntington Beach, Seventeenth Street Section" as shown on map recorded in book 4, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. 1 Mr. Miller i ` Engineering dept � I I i � r Regarding: Townlot Assessment District i i *UNTlk 1051 E. Tujunga Ave. 1975 MAY .�_9 fir, 8 ; Burb=k, Calif. 91501 May 114., 1975 City Council City of Huntington Beach California 92648 Re Assessment District #7301 Specific Plan Townlot Area #2 Gentlemen: This is a definite protest against the above plan by a property owner in the area (lots 13 and 15, blk. 619) . All logic and good judgement point against it historically, economically, environmentally and for just plain decent fairness to those who desire to live and make a home in the avea -- those people who have planned and waited and who will be hurt. (1) Historically. My father bought this property October 1907 before I was born so I do have something to contribute. At that time like others he planned to build someday. He was assessed enormously for paving, sidewalks, curbs, parkways, utilities, street lights (first gas then expensive electric lamp posts) . This was from the beginning planned by the City of Huntington Beach to be a very fine residential section. These assessments were so expensive he had to let his other properties go as did others. Then in the early twenties oil came. - My father objected furiously along with many to drilling in this section. He fought all the way never leasing or dealing. You well know what happened --everything was ruined, vandalized. The City did not protect the property owners or the improvements at all.- In the meantime taxes increased. You could not even sell. When. I took over in the early 601s, it was zoned M2 and valueless. Shortly, without notifying me, it was zoned R2. Still I was unable to build altho my block was fairly clean. The banks would not loan because of the terrible conditkon' of the area. By then most of the land was owned by StandARd Oil --and other oil companies. Gradually builders did come in and gambled_ to build however they could. And other people began to buy as they could. From a complete chaotic and static condition there has been improvement, clean-up, building and buying in spite of the City' s doing very little but collect for taxes and weed cleaning. I do not wish to press personal hardships but, since it has happened to others, I do want to call attention to the fact that the City permitted a variance for R3 on either side of my R2 lots without my knowledge. I an now restricted to R2 between triplexes which is not certainly a desirable situation. The City'n_tASbt better have used ita time -and effort for preserving low density and general improvement. It seems very unwise now, when at last there is progress, to ex- peet property owners to pay again for what had been paid for, which had been destroyed by others, not protected by the City all along, and is not needed. Is it not wiser to accept the reality of what;f has happened and help, not stop, this progress? There is such a great danger of repeating past mistakes. Why pay twice for no- thing? Go back to the drawing board. 1 (2) Econthmically. We are in a recession if not a depression. Every effort should be made to curtail money expenditdres and make sure they are essential and wise . The streets are wide and now clear, the utilities are in the alleyq, development is progressing along the lines the City has prescribed with the present R2 zoning and low density goals. It is obvious that the proposed changes would not only be far too costly to initiate now at this time but would guar- antee. future costs and hardships. It is equally obvious that this proposal has not been considered from every angle. Surely the City has some responsibility to property owners like myself for main- taining and protecting the streets? Surfacing is all that is needed for the present development to continue. Why any needless expense? (3) Environmentally. The proposed plan would not be an environ- mental Improvement; it would be a set-back as it would increase density and change character of area. The present R2 owner-oaculUed development is most desirable as you well know. The streets are wide and clear since the utilities are in the alleys. The present ley-out of wide stteets, parkways, and off-street parking is not only attractive but practical. The problems of on-street parking especially near the ocean are great ranging from salt-air erosion to theft and damage, to say nothing of just the movement of large numbers of non-resident strangers close to homes. It is a well known fact that there is more crime with on-street parking. increas- ing police and insurance costs. At present each lot faces a street and one can not only walk but see straight down to the ocean. With the proposed plan my lots on 19th St, would face a parking lot and a person to see or walk to the ocean would have to walk thru park- lots to the corner, turn and then walk two blocks to llth St. or one block to 20th St. And this would cost much moneyl Can you call this an aesthetic or useful improvement? The streets are in, they are wide, they spread and carry the traffic directly and there are alleys. Would not it be better to use and improve what you have (4) For decency and fairness. Who wants this change and why, who possibly can benefit, and why ignore the property owners? Such a plan is not needed. There are other things that can be done. It is an #n:just expense having been paid for before and the present owners (those who held on and those who bought recently) having to pay for something they do not want. It is untrue that money was made on the oil and that this somehow compensated for the destruc- tion. Property owners fought- the oil then, losing out completely, as they are fighting this proposal now. The present owners like the area, want to protect it as it is and to build to live in it. They will add, not detract. Many bought and planned because of the City' s present zoning and density goals. Others like myself waited and suffered a long time just tobbe able to do something. Do you realize how indecent it is for the Planning Commission or whoever to set about deliberately making changes against the concerned prop- erty ownwrCt wishes? It would be indecent to mar again such a pot- entially nice area with this absolutely ugly and environmentally harmful proposal. I trust you gentlemen will recognize there is positive development at last in -this sad section; will be on your toes to see history does not repeat causing hardship or making something ugly again. Sincerely concerned, Ma y J. Bauman c/o Mary J. Krog RtCEIVED i aUh T 0,GT 4 4;x ,c;t IF, To : Planning Dept, City Council From: Leonard Wright 5-12-75 City of Huntington Beach 606 - 15th Street Sub ect: Townlot Assessment District (Area 2) "+ ' �` Reference: Summary Report, Townlot Specific Plan Area Two Ordinance and Townlot Assessment District ?3-01, May 5, 1975. My main interests in the Assessment District are: that property-owners not be burdened with excessive costs. that the density is not increased in any part. that formalized concepts are acceptable to the owners (especially residents and potential residents) . OVERVIEW 1. Keep assessment costs reasonable. The $7,000 to $11,000 originally proposed assessment costs seemed excessive for a 50-foot lot (revised estimates are somewhat lower). In seeking ways to keep costs from being exorbitant (or confiscatory), we might keep in mind: . improvements that have already once been funded or installed. • what is actually needed. • how improvements should be financed. 2. Stick to the approved Land Use Element. If assessment costs are kept reasonable: • this removes the reason to propose higher density, • this in turn may eliminate or reduce the need for certain assessment Item(s) --- thus further reducing assessment costs. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Justice as a criterion for who finances improvements Generally, as much as is possible, those who benefit should finance the benefits. Some feel that present owners have profitted from oil mining and therefore should equitably finance all of these improvements. I believe (without proof or backup) that most of the current owners aren't those who got the lion's share of the oil profits. The property-owners who leased their property to oil companies got a relatively small percentage of the profits. Additionally, they've paid property taxes for many years without their tax dollars benefitting their property. Many of the present owners didn't own this property when it was producing oil. 2. Many previous owners preferred no oil drilling. When oil was discovered., a good number of homeowners probably wanted in on the chance for profit. But many fought against it just as many of us might be against oil wells going, up throughout where we live. 7 1 idly T. B£3l2TTl:dT4' - 6a' 0 Bui-ban'A�, gal i �� Gl � i4-'j— :Haym Salomon Q nan'a�H H m:Salomon 1 nanerat Her a Salomon. 0 Fnanaa!Hero I I SPECIAL DELIVERY SPECIAL DELI11EPY Haym Salomon Financial Hero Haym Salomon Fnanciai Hero I City Council ' URGENT 2000 Main Street i . City of Huntington Beach Haym Salomon Q /7nancial Hero Attention California 92648 City- Clerk M- �Haym Salomon Financial it.. { LLW to PD. CC -2- 5-12-75 KEEP ASSESSMENT COSTS REASONABLE 1. Don't include improvements reviousl funded and or installed. . Certain improvements were funded during subdivision_. It's reasonable that present property owners should not be hit with these costs again. • Some improvements deteriorated during oil mining. It's unfair to stick present owners with costs that should have been covered by those who caused. the deterioration. 2. Tax- income from oil mining. Oil has contributed significant taxes to H.B. Either: . part of these taxes should have been reserved for improving the oil fields or . oil companies should have been held responsible for replacing Improvements they've helped destroy (possibly an annual maintenq n`e fee. Unfortunately it's a little late for the bulk of the oil wells. ) . 3. Normal city maintainence was not performed. The city felt that this wasn't necessary under the circumstances. This might be a consideration for part of the funding. 4. We should. allow the average person to own and live in the assessment district. • The proposed costs might force the average person to give up his property. . A developer must pass his costs on to the buyer. Such exorbitant costs might guarantee that only the affluent could afford: to own or live in the assessment district. 5. Limit improvements to what is needed. 6. Finance improvements in a way that minimizes assessment costs. a. Total minimum costs might be segregated: . normal lot development costs previously provided or funded: not the responsibility of the present owner. . normal lot development costs not previously funded or provided: responsibility of the present owner. . items already present to some degree or normally handled by the city- . desireable features that property owners may or may not feel are worth the cost. b. An alternative: 5 O funding by city and owner on some items. It's easy to want to go cadillac (instead of Ford) when someone else 's money is being spent. If the city were to finance half of certain improvements, and were under strong financial restraints, r1 LLW to Pn, CC -3 5-12-75 more ways might be found to eliminate what isn't needed. Examples: • although certain streets should be completely redone (we don't want to do less than required, only to have to redo them lat0r) , Inspection might show that certain streets only need to be resurfaced. • it may be discovered that some sidewalks, curbs etc. are adequate. If eul-de-sating were done (therets overwhelming sentiment against it) , this would. require street widening; hence would cover up the more equitable and reasonable approach to financing the street upgrading. Improvements to be handled 50-50 might include: • street removals and paving (definitely) • curb and gutter (probably) • sidewalk (probably) Corner lots are hit extra hard, but without having that much of a benefit. Perhaps the costs there ought to be owner 33 1/3, . city 66 2/3. Whir 50-50 In a way 50-50 seems a very fair division in favor of the city for the above improvements because: • once streets are dedicated to the city (and the city accepts them) , the city is responsible for maintaining them. . • property owners funded these improvements once, and they were Installed (except sidewalks in some places) . • property owners have paid taxes for years without these tax dollars benefitting their property. • substantial oil taxes have been collected, but none have gone back to benefit the property. • the city has not charged oil companies a fee for improvements oil trucks have helped to deteriorate. It's unfair to burden present owners with these costs. c. Total-acceptable costs A number of people will think these costs are too high. I don't believe assessment (and other developer improvement costs) costs should exceed: $3,000 for an interior lot 3 4,000 for a corner lot. d . A reasonable and responsible developer Of the developers, Mel Hoeffliger and Sally Gi ple appear to promote a sound , quality development of the area. Some of their experience and ideas may be useful. LLW to PD, CC -4- 5-12-75 8. Certain items should not be assessed. These include: a., improvements to arterials. b. storm drain costs that are associated with servicine other areas. If storm drains are in anAadequately service what originates in the assessment district, this area should not be assessed for water that comes from elsewhere. Perhaps refurbishing entries is enough. Or, if the assessment district actually needs larger drains, a wider district should be assessed. c. possibly some utilities. 9. Comments of the estimated costs (see the reference from the PD) a. Street removals, street paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk (Ref., p. 4) • Streets either completely by the city or 50-50 • These costs are a little on the high side (except maybe street removal) . b. Parking Court Concept, Stamped Concrete, Landscaping (Ref., P. 5) Delete these. c. Underground Edison (Ref. , P. 5) Undergrounding seems to be desireable. But the $1,500 per 50-foot lot is too high. It's ok if you can get the property-owner cost down to $300, Otherwise, delete this. d. Eliminate arterial street improvement costs. PARKING COURTS 1. Innovative idea. The parking court idea is an innovative concept for providing parking and reducing bulk. An idea may or may not be accepted by those affected depending on the circumstances. ,whether or not an idea is accepted under a given set of circumstances does not detract from the desireabliity of devising alternative solut ions to problems. This attitude should be encouraged. When you get enthused about something and work on it for a long time, you'd like to see it implemented. When so much thinking, contacting' planning and effort go into promoting a given concept, it's difficult not to realize the anticipated results. But some things that look good on paper don't seem so great to those who have to pay for them or live with them. 2 . Those affected. should decide. My feeling is that those in the affected area should determine if they want a given concept. The overwhelming testimony has been against parking courts . Comments from the R2 area have been "leave us with -5- 2 units per 50-foot lot and forget the parking court concept." Parking courts seem more suited for higher density areas. It's unfortunate that below Orange and west of 17th was too far developed. to propose parking courts initially (not that owners would necessarily accept courts there either --- for many of the same reasons given in the assessment district) . The main rationale for parking courts in the Assessment District ` is that they will support parking required by higher density. A density incentive is proposed as an inducement to accept high assessment costs. If assessment costs are reduced to a minimum practical level (including no parking courts) , there 's little justification for a density incentive. If the density is held at 2 units per 50 foot lot above Pecan, therets no need for parking courts. If a density incentive were then given, you might think: "Parking courts are intended to solve parking problems. There's no parking problem where we want to put the courts, , So wetll raise the density to create the need for more parking. Now we can use the parking courts to solve a problem we wouldn't have had if we hadn't deliberately created it." 3. Feedback to the Regional Coastal Commission Coastal Staff likes the parking court concept. I believe the Coastal Commissioners would accept it if thatts what the property owners want (the only commissioner comment at the Oct. S meeting was that he didn't like it) . ` We can tell the Coastal Commission thEt although there was support for the parking court concept, there was enough opposition that we decided to use the Coastal Commission's original plan: 2 enclosed parking spaces per living unit. One developer testified at the Coastal hearings that although he originally disliked the 2 garages per living unit requirement, he found that after building a few, it made for a much better development. This is one approach that may result in reducing on-street parking (although some complain that garages are too small to get their cars into) , controlling density, upgrading the quality of development and trending towards less transiency and related problems. 4. Feedback to the Orange County Environmental Coalition We might tell the Environmental Coalition that: • zoning densities are being reduced in area 2 and generally thruout the townlot. • resident-owners who've strongly opposed the higher density developmmnt generally agree with what seems to be the way the townlot zoning will end up. • the only permits that reach the Regional Commission are those that conform to the intended zoning. • that appeals to 3 tatr+ of these permits may result in higher, not lower, d.e,nsity because the city would be forced to adopt a plan s LLW to PD, CC -6- 5-12-75 that lets developers build (a higher, not lower, density plan) . The State would then approve these permits. 5. Concerning the State Coastal Commission If past efforts prove unsuccessful: • generate resident-owner support for the zoning that conforms to the Land Use Element, • work to affect the State plan towards reasonable results, If this is unsuccessful: • work to dilute the powers of the State Coastal Commission. POLICE DEPT COMMENTS ABOUT INCREASED DENSITY AND PARKING COURTS - AREA 2 The Police Dept finds that both the increased density and .the decrease`` in off-street parking would result in more crime, and possibly the need for more police. The following is from a Police Dept Interdepartment Communication$ Memo from Capt Burkenfield to Bryan Austin, Advanced Planning,, 4-29-75, '` Subject: Town Lot Specific Plan Assessment District. RD-349. "If parking we can (anticipate?) under the new code requirements (cul-de-sacing) that we will experience an annual crime index at saturation at 28,13 vehicle related crimes on-street and 6.9 off-street for a total of 35.09 crimes per year. "The new code would result in a 27.5% decrease in off-street parking "In summary the new code (illegible word) will result in a 16.3 Increase in crime caused solehr by the increased density. The projected crimes including the density adjustment will again be increased by 10% brought about by displacing the off-street parking. The total crime increase anticipated from that which we would experience with the old code that protected with the new code will be 24.6%." STICK TO THE APPROVED LAND USE ELEMENT A basic city objective is to lower density, not raise it. The density Incentive (for the area bounded by 17th to Goldenwest. Pecan to Palm) : • could allow significantly higher density than the area is now developing, • is contrary to the reasonable best interests of the current and future resident owners. • Is in the opposite direction that the city and Townlot area were said to be going. . .,contradicts a "Citizens Goals and Objectives Policy Plan" objective of cycling to the same or lower density. A better zoning would be : for the present R2 area: maximum of 2 units per 50-foot lot or (17 - 23rd, Pecan-Palm) 1 unit per 25-foot lot. for the present R3 area: would prefer same as above. 0ould accept: (Orange-Pecan, etc, maximum of 3 units per 50-foot lot or / ' 1 unit per 25-foot lot. ll l To: '1'1li+ CI'U'Y We t4UlJ'.L,1iiuTui4 ULAGH ' s ' . %. I A!•1 ul't'v;s D '.eu 'nix; 1'':tt%POU;D " '1OW111"m AS:�i':;i:u•tib,l':' 1JI:...`I'�i:ll:'1"' I L; - Da to b�.�ned 1 ,orm t U 0 Ft. in the Tc-,ti'NLOT pp,� `.C. \V 01 To: Tl:�; C1'1'Y uF' ilUliTl►�u`1�Vi'i bi ;Cll 11,14 11'0 ' 14k; '2':�t Y0S1:0 Y' TU.:iiLO'T A�SF;SS,•,::.�:'1' J1�;1`:tiC'' � `� `� N Date si�ued � � I, mi...: r: tl rvn j iC a v��a•.uv a ,AwSiJy`N�1`laili'1' Jl.i'1'1tlL'1i M'. ' PHOIdLrr'_ __`01 Yam- To; VW CITY OF i:U11T1RGTuV rsF� i:ii I. AM urt'OaLJ Tu ` ij.L; PtZOPC si.) " 'ruio"OT ASSa:.`.�::ir''tl.iS1' lll:.>`1't11C'1'11 - Date -si;;ned 3- I ovna Ft. in the TOW4LOT M ' ' . A SS�:.iSt•:r.tr T vi N'1'.<I L`l'. N ' ' E To: TiiL CITY OF :iUi�TIItGTO.t iiI„E;Cii ! 6 P.;OrOk;L11 l Date sii;ncd _ .3 SG I own1 Ft. in the 1'U�il4i,Una,'. �y ' To: THE CITY OF tiUir` lNUTUN iJ&,CH • I Ali Uvi�OSLD TU `1'lli; PL?0P0,6i;D MMLOT 0 r Signed Date signed I ovin Ft. in the TOWRLOT, i ' ASSF;SSi•►r:c�'1' t)IS`1'11I�:'1'. M Pon r i ` To.: `1'Hr: CITY OFF rlUil'elHU eUfi 64GH' I AN Uri-X)6j:D `i'U Ttit' -PRUPOSkW " `lUdhWrA ASS�S:�•arr'1' J1::`1'•t1C'i'ii \`. . Date signed I ovm .S_D Ft. in the TOWILOT (M� To:. THE c.,LTY. OF HUNTIili;Toll i LICH I All OPPOSED 'TO lcliE' V jUpOSc;D 201 !4LO'T i ASSF:.yai.:�l'1' 1)I,6TdICT" SignacL� •f' ...��, Date I ovin . ASS1tiS.5tli.liY'' 111.�1a�lvli T�+�%ai.uUl' 7,0 To:. THE CITY UF. HUNTIiVCTOI�t ISFa,CH . I A24 OPPU:; ,D •'i'0. `mE""PROPOSLD M.RLOT . .Signed - Date signed I ovum / 2 S Ft in the TUk1twx ASSF:5:�l,r l+`l' y1.5`1'aI-C'1: h1. To; THE CI:'Y OF :,UW.VlNU`l'Ull sLi,Cti I Al., U1'i-U:.;:.J '1�• '. I,.. j-,j(U1'Jij1iJ) �� •,MaILUT Signed . V D at o si-n o.:i I otiin _) (.' ' JI Ft. ia the TO'14VLO'i N ) z A S.`ir.S Sr,�l/1' J-''7`!.�1«:':'♦ /f /.0/ -/ 2- ' T�% CI`a'Y OF �tJt�t'1'I1tU`t'ul�t L ',Oli A85i;:;,%*L:li i' j Ll i Date. sigwuedj - - ' • I , I ot�n C' 12o E�:4 Ft. .i.n ;,he TUriNLVV C L--A TO:. -THZ C;`l'Y UF. HUNTI UTOil bLi'.CIi I All oPPu ; `1'O `lil; Pa&C:'ziD I" TU�i;�LO'1' �• ASS�;Sa•,�a1' LI:�Y'aICT�� nod. er v , 7 i �• Date SijLned17��c�i. . S<_ 1 . LA tilr rt ASS�,Ssiiri.�Y uia'1'it1Cl: p�oii ;F s" 3.G w � To: Tb: -vITY ,GF HUli`1.Ii�uTOi1 bE:iCH I ::All. 0PP04LD.:T'O `i•lik r-ZL;POSI;D i► TO,.iiLOT ASS�;,;,�►::.:�,7' lil:>1',{ICT'l w Sivlledk. M. Date Si;;inod • I 1 I o�:n. �Alc TU�,iiL(}r M 1 To: VIE CITY Ulu iiUlr`1'1NUTUII u1:"C11 I Al;i ol'i,064"D TU '1'tl;� )?".Ok•U�.+Lll " 'LOiirILOT . Si fined ; -.Date si anod I own �� Ft. in the TGti�NLO"� A S:iLSS;•,rc+'1' ui.J`li�I':'1'.. PHONS /r,_,_. To: THE:: CITY lily' .-iUNTlilti` UU i3E/.i:H f I :►I''i Ul'1�):JLJ '20 ' ni, 1'RUO. rLD " 'lU UlLC ' • ASS1:SSi•:a:,:�"i' �Ji::il'itiC'1"� Date si�nod I ovm. F t. in the Two:NiOT. ASSr,:iSl•:i,rr'1' A).L tivT. A rii0li J/-'—7 5 "7 --A ZQ ..3 To: THE CITY OF nUirTINGTON. uFACH T f ' I A11 OPk'OS.,D1'alOPOSLD 'I 10414LOT ASS�;SSI SIT DL4TR1CT" Signed 1 /f Date signed i NN I own - Ft in .the TONiiLOT. • . ASSRSS::r:c�1: DIa'1'►tIGT. r'1 PHONE V51 THE w �, `1'1I At�► � Too Signed] Date ci3nod Mat 12r19?5 I own _ 50 Ft, in the TOWILOT �► E N poxl ,f,,_,_• 536-2839 s 'j'Ot ''eliz; l:ll'Y wr AWITINUTOII :::u:Cli I All OPPu".-W '1'0 THE 1'A41 S%l) �� TW iJLO'1' Signed �• '- � _� Datd ei�ned 17 Cj • I o;:n � .. in the :��111.Ci rkv% oS Eu IF15E -'3r'�3�w Si3+rnFrS - p�'o Ra�`'yc:�w krr� To;" Tar; CITY Uk HUIr''1'1HJ'TON bLi ch Y All CPPJ:.i:J 1'0 'i-TJE 'ei2C1=0SED TO,,1J1,0',i' `l' 1)1;:T,4%T': _ N` Datc, oi4�ued I o•::n �i ` ) �1� .Tt. in tho TU-11" Ix . A_ SSi:.�.5:•uac'1' 1JA Nitta 'Y'i ^` . ell To.'. THE CITY OF HU1J'1'Il:GToN BLACH I A11 0Pwu1:D '1`0 `t'HE 1':itil si;D i' TOi�1JLO' �- 1 LI .- ASSr:.;S:•.z.::T yl::'1':tTCT" V �. : Sign d %�� •r (��'"Zc lv Date si nod`..?_:f,.SL_"L �. �^t. in +.the Ca M PHO44w Y' '`�.h Z 7 3 9 To. Tffi� C1TY OF uUNTILWTUA Lrf_Cli AM Ut'r'oaa TO 2'xii, PROPOSLL Tv:e'ULOT ASSLSa2i::.�'1` vI:,�TalIC'1'" 1 si ed - �• ,, 1/r t-G� Date siGaod I orm rFt. in tho Tv.dii3OT rr To: TIL, CITY OF rlUi:'i11JUTUU �ok�,::ii „ , L , • I AIRUa•rO:�LD 1U 111., 11ZO1'0�+� 1'UuIV.L(71 Date I o.,u ,0 Ft. in the TO ##LOT N1 ASS.:.:i.+J•.ca.l' J .al'�tIC`1'. �1 To: 1'jL; C1'1'Y U ' aL'IJT1s�T0i+ I All oM? ;;D 10 'elll; t':ZUl;US�y� " TWIvLC'i' r, tICT��IT r IISSr;aa,•....+�. j 7 Signed Date Ei;;ned To-: Ta CITY ule tiUl•J'lildITuli ujLi,LH 1 _A!•' Orrv:;k;D `1'U- 1't 1: p iUFOSED ASSLSSa•u,;J`l' yI:►Tic1CY"' . Simed , i �• i'72/J � . Date si-ned I ovm Ft. in the TOWiLOT ASSc,.�St.t,,;`.l' TO: T" .CITY- VF..aUbreI;jgTUY _ - I AN OPPOS..D TO `1'iiy i''i:01"Q�Lt� �' TOtYIil.O`j _ ASa1::SS1•u;i:1' Jl�,i'RICi'" - .� Date &:il:ned 3 - iii the TOWILOT I o�rn �o Ft. M 4 7 N PIIONL rt ZI '_ _, 5-`7 e 1 2 3 / TO: THE GITY uUA%'1'UUTUH 4a Cli TO " Y i:i•. UriU:,. l.) '1.v '1'ili:� !' 1r1�LUj .c A/ l 1 � �•� ma's�. !'1 �� " D/erjil rigid r.:.� y- Y c:rn Ft. in the TO'.• AkV AS.�LSS•. .i+'1' !)T_:iTl{ly!. 1 is ic): TH: CITY OF t:Uii'tIFlUTU9 6FJLCH i I. AR 12U Tui;. PROPOSLD. .1t '1Q41iLOT Q ASSr:55t•,1:,YY �Ia11tjG'j'll ' ' Date 6i AEd =1 C+"�. . NN 1. 0. C? Ft. in the TUiiNLOT ASS Sl.tr..1' �1a ' CT. rii0ji . TO: 'THE CITY OF :iW 1'I1WT0N s!:;r''',;H � Z 111: ()PkO.`i"D TU 'Lnii; P!i0if061,J " '!'O;+iiLOT b Jl:.,i ►1C 'it� - - - Signed D at ,i m d a I Orin •I0 Ft. in the MMLOT ASSr:SS PA011k: ;� 1�_ � �1 N�► Lv p R .. ♦ ,,� l To: -T" CITY OF I-WINTU Mli bLhCK ! + I-.A14 OPPv :0 10 THE I OS! D 11 TOs.NLO7.' OD61si;;ned '� - j14 40"Ci r.V.ILVi ASS;b.bl. a1C'11. i t iM f P11oll 01 t ' Tot THE i:i'1'Y vF IIUliThWTOil bkjLCIi 1 I All ONPJ:;l;a TO THL i=aOIJO&LD " TOW4LOT ASSLbiiva.44T yl&'jTiL TCT" 4 SJLZnod K Date s:ianed 3 -% 7: Lv� Z ovm d ri t. in the Tv'ir':%rj-J ASS1:S►5�•►Li+l Ll:i1'a�IG'1: 1 N Plioilw� Y w . T" CITY UP HUtl`i'I1 .CIi 11,I1 mf'AJ ::ll TOHL t:�C%k() !,D AwSi:s.�a•i..::`1' i�l::`1'ailC`1'" �; Si�ncd� 4 Date sii;ned Z o�:n `-t in the :: :1:y0T . �►SSESsiir . J !- a ,+Y' ylS`t'ifICY': N1. N j. 4�30 33y To: THE CITY OF AUliTIRGTWl d!r!,CS I AM uPFO�;,z 'j'V `1'LLi. �'a'Ul'V.`iLD " '-icml'1 w -ASSES.SN:.�;i:r L)l.:i'RICl'" SiGnod4;z m Dato rignod'l1 I .o+ n —Ft. in ' the TOVi[1LWA, A r " �- ,.mow-..r.r...---- '.•--•._�-�. _ - - ±' To: THE CITY OF nU[rTYL 'TOH tsF.E.CH I "Ak uPYos 'to PaloilOSI D " `rOWVLOT ASSk:aS�u.1�T D1:a li "'Tze 0. Signed Date aignod ip 177J N N I own A Ft. in the -TOWRLOT ` 1 � • NN � ' `.mom+ �..�•. j I ILK or lkl ;w "eu 1'rlt; 1'itUPOSLL �� '1ur�rVLUT .: ; ASSi:;i i•u.i�i' i1I:•;i'ti1C'1''� Signed A . Date si-nod-�7� I otim � 1 Ft. in the TubmLo`r f,dCT. rHolt�; � S3G- 7750 To: THI; C.TY uI` 111INTIAuTUi't br liCii ' .rlul OSr:D TO,►irLOi' Signed 4-1 Date signed in tro .TU. 1�i3OT i To: THE CITY or, .::Uir' I lir4 upros: 1) 1v CH . ASSr;SSlin.i:T y' t'u Date. 0ned I Own M A.Sar:SSi►r'�i�a .�Tyi'I Ft. the Prtorrr; �;� To: THL CITY .OF nUir1'ILfGq'�ri � :;CFi I 'Ark GyP05;;17- ASS SSPtc41T ;�l:,i'Rl TnY .GrUS,t;D 10 Yir' Signed. ! Dato6ned I own i ALSSiZ1' ul:.i1'iIIr;1r^t. the iUii �1.OT P1I0IIL -._,.t:s-:i '-•- '• - - r-t . - - - f- i.'--d..u..vs.•:-]_-t,+=s_ az_ .,:.:.:t•.sxn-i.B::cis.br.•3,;::iYa`wn,nf■irw.-.s:.faa,-�hA16J "r✓a1kx..3u:'wH.eK...,=.Cl.ia%.vim. �ale�ubrofi� • ) i TO; `1'Hl; UWY 01' 44Ui4'1'It1G`1'ULl .1sl�.Cl1 - a i At1 Ul'!'OS;Z 'ru 'ell:: k,%fJP06LD " 'WiMLOT Date ciCnod A .fA,•.: .a I e:9t1 ASSESS+•"vd' �_Ft. in the TOWnLOT. ; \ Ul:�'�'kIC'1'. \ M IV -- To: M CITY OF AUNTINUTVI: blid,CH - , I AR OPPuz LD TO THE. Y:VrOS M " "O►,i4LOT ASSr:JS,•.::,+1' yl'.;'1'itilCTll �. . Sis;ned i li 1 1101 Date signed •-� _ J 7 • in the TUi:ASaJ A. L-A To: T" :.ITY OF HUNTI 4TUA hr r:CH I All OPPO:�D; TO THE TO` ALO`1 855r:5S,•"iT Date sidnod ,,he. rnowlIL(yn �' M - - AS.SE,y.SC•tt.ia'1' L.15`1'dl:i'L': . .. , PHOBiw 4 N - To: THE; CITY OF nUlJTINGTuli[ csli►Cli I IiM Ut't'O:ik;� U ci' -. .Pr?UPOSED " '1`UjjtYLOT ASSES&'u:r �ISTI?1C'1'�� v - V • Sign°... ,' y� � � �. Date r _ ASS `S�i Ft. in the TokmwT. . M ' To: TIT, CITY up uUt{'��Nu'1'u!d :IEi�Cli t. I AM oely iia Tu '1'lYL' 1'1cuPOZLD ASSi:SS.•Lutix Urban Becoty ctio ' Steven L. Butcher, A.V.P. Date Gidnelt_��rch 12 1975� 0 I ovti 200 Ft. in the TUwNLOT � rHUd� #_(213) 670-0150 ' f To: THE C 1.12Y OF HU!{1 I;{vTvi'i r-.I;CH I I• AM CPPU�;;U '�0 THE e;jcPO5!0 ". T6-,,LOT ASS�SS.•,::►+`l' DIa`l'::ICT'�. .- Date signed yiTlr%-I oym N. , i ASSr�aa�lr.,+'I ,�is'i':tIC'1: To THE :CIT.Y OF .iUi�Tli{ta.tO�I if- 40 I..AIi OP:OS `lv: `1'ti.r. i�.tOrOSla) n `P.Oi1atLOT.. Q A&,!:;;Si,xAiT in;4 RIC`1'�' Signed r I Own i"� _ Ft. in the -TOWNLUlj N1 ASSr:SSr,ri+'1' •ulalrtl 1'« '.x`,✓ � � ' \ .. i To THE GI�'Y OF iiWiTINGTox ozi,u i I All OF'!OS� 'tU �♦ :. . l�Sar.S.`.a.riiT ll1:..,21 .�'n Signed Date aiSnod. 1 I .oven j!J Ft. 1j, the .TOWNLOT �1� ASSESS:•.G �`l' �15't'�tIC'1'. O 14 To: Tfik: CITY Of uU iTING`i`ONto 1Sl:yCH a r. �- I All QPVOk;.,.D Y'J `l'►►i Y.�Cik Ur`+r:D �� `iGr'il�l1,G`l' tr G 'e O Signed'`' Dato oipne c I own Ft. in the TOWiLOT C, N. W n 1- A.S�' r:SSrat;c�1' 1JI:a`1'itl�:'1'. w - pHor ;Or CZ tr -� Qlit i Ur t'v�i"' TO '1':z I'KGPOsLJ Tv*' :frLU e (Tfj� 7 1.SSk:SSi•.Lii (1C'TI, Q � N , 1 Date fjigued N 1 ohn S d Ft. in the TO To:. `I'HS g1TY 'F riUN`INUTON BLX i. I A14 OPPI)4iLD '10 HF-. 1'ROPOS10 :'! ToWi '2 . . � A5SLtiS;•:"a2` JISrl': fij . . y D'ate✓agi ed ctirn . ;'t. is the T ...c...�� Aa�.S..rSia11:.1�'j' ►�iJ`l'LtiLii r . To: tU-GITY uF HUNTINUTOir'. bk:F,CB I AN oPpJ:,r:D, ASSsr+T DI I"T" Sizadd Dat ai„nod- A 73 Z o:'ni in the ^(Alcuc T tA JLSNr,3;jr "' --I.,I —� Z. ----------- qq + TO: T",' CITY Ul ilUkiTRIGTON tiE :Cli'. I. Jai ux,v6,Si ;J TO ` tiE PiWPOZED " `1'U►i1+LOT f, ASai:Saf•lia;+!. yl:.Zi.ilCl ' Si Ga ed. Vlzti`�L Date sig fsned cG'' n-� ,,_.._,�/+7,- I ownB 00 _F�. in the TC--�NL0T - s Piioi;� ;��C1 --Q•� �"� j j 4 To:. TKE CITY uF HUNTlivUTGN BLACH a cHu::LD 11:0 `FE PR,: ;pO sja D " TO'.;NLOT . Signed - Date si;ned I Z mn.. T.r rvn G:;2'. �-J � y�i.• in �.tiE a v, a.uvl. i PiiOld ,tr'• VOW --- T_o.: THE CI`1'Y OF ,lUllTIl'lMC)-U riFj:GH I. All OPPOSED TO ,iL Pi;OPGS%D " `l'U'iil47.OT r•E J r i A.,.�iia?5.11:iY 1 ll l,;iceT t.1 Cl . 's • Sued r .. 'ter . i Date si,-ned I orm rt. in the TCAMLOT r ' ASS�.aSi•:r�;T �ia'i':<ICT. - •� ol `,Co: T.0 i:ITY OF :iUATIIIGTO;I ,1 P:o ro Si:L " IOtiri�LOi' . Signed T Date si ne,_ s F , r t. in -the 1'Uiili;CYi✓'�f � d` c. 4 To: THE CITY OF :iUETINGT0.1 iiEE,CIi j I A14 OP.POSi:D TU TjjE Pa{OP06L1) " 'MMLOT '� hSSr;SSt•u.iV`i' llla`rRIC`i"' /� � .• Signed ! Date s:i fined I oven 5� Ft. in the TOti' NLOT. s ,,.- AS:ir;SSi•►�:r�T DI5`l'i{I�:`i'.. • f . 1 K ; To-: THL CITY OF riUNTING`iON BE!-.CH . 4 I Aki Us"i-106 D TO 'ThE PROPOSED " `(MILLCYi } ASSx:SSi•,�v'1' i).1::`i'a{1.C1'tt - i Signed.,) Date signed I ovm SD Ft. in the TUtiAILOT 1 { rRoivE To:. THE CITY OF HUR'''INGrIoN B&►CH I. All CPPJaED TO THE PROPOSED "" TO�iigLOT ASSr;.SSi•.:�iiT DTS1'i1TCT" Sionecl. •� .-�� - Dat a si,3ned�� jI OLRI t :•:. v.r. nrn In tal e i•mv ,tLv� - 1 + s 4 j .--- ------ _ - -------- 't Tot THE CITY OF HUNTINUTON BEACH E h. "till OPPUiJLD TO THE PROPOSE " TOviliLOT ¢ ASSF,SSi-,z:tiT 1DI&'J-TiUCT" Signed � �-ti•� - �L�il�t I Date signed I ovm_ 1 ZS� Ft._ in the TU;;I[LOT 3 t ASSr;SS%,LWI: DIS`i'iiIC2: 1: i R 4"- • - 4 • i ` i. i To; `l'HE CI:'Y OF :iUir`t'IPtli`1'UIt isEf,CH . TOVIALOT Ir Aft U1'r01�D 'i0 `:'1:� qq ,ff iJ.�l�+/7.`.it•l'L1tT Ul ul'i21 C`1'I1 J; // � r • � ril ' /ice Signed Z Date simcd �' s l the TOriItLOT S I orrn � A S:at.a$L•I,r.,l'��• J.=�7 /GZC�GfiJ PIIONE 1 To `i•Ylr: CITY-OF. 1-U;'• TINGTON .6hL-XR I. AM OrA0;:ED TO THE PROPOSE) ASS1i:SSi•l�:,ii i' DT aTil1 C'i'r+ SiGaed; < C U Date si-Gued3/1-312 _ I ovin .50 (z--,VF't. in the TO�,;RLOT - ASSi:SSi•:�:i11' ;.i�:�rl`it1.V T. �.� � �` To:. THE CTY OF HUNTI-1-iU'O l BE.C;i i I. AN CPPO;::0 TO THE PRC&OL"ED " TO�iNLOT � 1)14;1':?ICTn Signed f Date siGned2Lz i 4 n 4, C mf'-.!- i.r I r rn ASS�.S�r'1�,+'1 iJ1b`1'i{1C`l': c PHOmw p i. To:. THE, CITY OF HUNILUEUTON B&;CH I All OPPJ,6LD TO ThE PRUPOSED " TOilliLOT f ASSr�SS;._ii7' 'LUCT" k Signe - . .• Da„e signed I or.,= i t._ in4.iic: me—, I ASS!;SSjiIu `l' 1:151'11IC7 : PHOId1"'tz To: THE CITY OF riWiTINGTOId 13LkCH Y I Ak OP110S;10 11:0 `1'll.:; P.'.OPO SfD " `I'0►h4LOT ASSESS.Ki ii k D16-TRICT" Signed • •.Date signed � /� 7`r T ovin Ft. in the T0W4LOT i A SS1rSai•�rai'1' �J.I:o`i'RIr:`1'. i p� PHONE I i ' s To: M,, CITY OF .-iUliTl-1UTU.0 6&,,:H I alp, UtiY?:iEJ '00 Tni; P:0POSr.D " 'i"UrlllLvl' ASS1;SSi'•tili:i' :�i:�T:l1CY'" _. • Si°wed --.��i Date signed I ovm - 2 F t. in the Tor-CLOT ASSr,6S=-,1' ritociE 1IZ=.. ��6 �0 To: THE CITY OF riWiTII'dGTON. isEACH i I AI•i U j PI'0,SLD 2'U `1,11E P:�JPOSED !'016WI.OT 1 ASSI%SSlyiiilT i)I;ii`RICT" Signed i Date signed I ov,n ASSI:SSi�r:cil Ft- in the TOL'IiJ1.0i. f �IalKICTo, i PiIONE � D - THE � 'Sf�11v�1i�`t'IId;�TCit vlrf:CH - � tLUu $16116CZ�1LildslL.. � � � Date signed Ma.r 12-19?5 ( b I oven 50 Ft. in the TOW-ILOT. Aa.1.c.S:Si•�. •�-+.l Jl o'1RIr..I. � .. k PHONE, ll� 536-2839* s O1' hUlITINUTGN L'H i To:- c1'rY I. OPPUwLll 'i'0 `i NL i'11ti1' SLD s� TGOALOT All 975 Dat wi,3ned p'• - M +' y1S'_'ii1CT f ASS.SSIir.� i lC "'y C"V%YA Tt - S TO: TH1: CITY OF HUN'1INUTON 13E1;CH i I J114 CI'PO:�1 D T10 rl'.iE P!?"POSED " TG;1dL0T s - ASSEaN . i +`r i ' d Date• si�ue fa mr' • r rvn X—t. in ASSLAbI'1�Ai'1 1J1 ii'1�.L V 1 i - To:. THE G. TY OF HUNTINGTON BLL GH I- All OPPU ;D '10 `i'HE 1; Oi'OS� s' TO i1L0'r . ASSi�„S;•,..::T lls;�T:?TCr1" Dat e sad +-f.. mn. r.r rvn 1.. 1 t�.-. is Yl1G /,VIYlU.iVi f i S f PHONE-ii` X' ( 7L -2y]3rl To.: T1iE CITY OF iiU11TIHGTuU LEi.CH x t E i At'i Ur't'OaLL TO Trir: PROFOSF,D " `l'v:1ti.LOT ASS1SS�•t::.ir`1' lll:'I'i{IC1" r . Sii;nnecl �� • .. .. Date signed � ��ry t,{l.`u��` � •. i t I owu �. Ft. in the TCaiflLOT ASSc.aSl•.LrfT Dl:�'1':;IC`i'. - ., r. .; e Nz i rHO�iI; it ' -' �.. F P To: TIL, CITY «. AW1` Il:Icl.NA ,3EACH `f • t '� I aS i � 1' i l.- T 1 � C- 1 � 1 t I AIR Ci�i-Jui;J lu 11-1;; P!RQ OZ!;D " 1'Ou LUT ASSI:SSici, �'i 1C2'' a . Siaed �o �' - � ` • Date --ned 3 - I ov;n Ft. in 'lie TC IllLOT ASS;:.:.i::il•,r.1,J.' :� .al'1zIC`1'. � (• To:. illi; CITY OF :f ITIN-UTOii I• AIN CPPJ:..;L7 TO THE i::uP;OSl li " TO-,aiLCT , Si med Date siSned3" �L��IJ C 1 f l V.. .l.aJ N11 1 V11�y r%r 1 ASSESSki.iiX 1J (,;'1': • PHOI'Ed LIJ i � = __ ._�__czs ram• ? j t To-: T116 CI`1'Y uF iiUlJ` illG'1'ULI LE�,CH f i i Al U-erG 6LD IN 1't r, PciOPOSED " `l(C.I PLOT ASSLSSj-"—ii' • SiSxied (" �.�Li1'J.,•� _--- �-G'-7`-'c'�� . Date sinned /1✓✓, s�'�• J�� I ovrn ! LI t "}- Ft. in the TOWILOT ASS:�:iSi:1,�11' D11'.�ICT. ss E X �,��;/-2✓ ��l`/ PHoi!E ��' car 3--7e-I i To: THE CITY uF UliTI!IGT0ll bLACH i I l,i;i OPpOS1.D '1•U 'j,AL P.:OPOSLD ( f ASS ;SSIu,i�T JIa`I'RTCl''" Signed Date signed -1 5 f I own zO Ft. in the T0ViNLOT- ASSESSI�r:r+'1' 1? ' PRONE 5-7r? � Z32 i I- ._.._ ..-__—'-_.._ -_._._._ .+ - _. ... -. ..---��..- -> ..r-----"=-max•--.r.-..-_. �..-- - -- ._. _ - TU: THE CITY OF :iU!'T11'G`1'tUf� SLnCIi' I. I:U 'i'i!L J.'.:OYOSLD "" T0'�LLUl' �v: :,i ASS�;„S.rvi;rfl �11.:TR-1i Dc a si-ned ,�� ' V I c:rn Ft. in the T0;71iLOT g i PRONE ,r } `l'fiL CITY OF hUNTI_dGTU6[ LEACH 110-1 ui't'Oa :D TU T" PROPOSED TU►;vLOT �: ASSESSi•u�i'i lil:�Tit1C'1"� _ � . . Sided �`�`-�:•y_•.�; r- ��t�_:_. -/*.-> - Date sifrned reg_��- • I or7^s 0 Ft. in the TQwNLOT A.SS 651it,.:T J-1.)T:<ICT. rloigL i TO: THE GIU Y OF :-iU_%'TIl-IGTON. ii>fr,CH { j - I All; UPi-OaiZ TU iiL 'O;"I:L TO iv iY lln:l` i l ASSI;a;�l;�,ir' Signed - Date sijned � -� : I ovin f 0 Ft. in the TOWWY2 ' . ASSi;SSi,r.:xi'1' �i �i'i<I•:'3'.. - a s 8 i { To: THE CITY OF HUTIN I RiTON HLLCU I AIN OPPU:,j'LD 110 TEE TO@o,f'1LOT t n, _Date sine LYo Yu�. LVatL Vy PHONE 6-1 yS 's f �r ^' .,wry:` ,,rl'• ...... .r ''.r Y''ra THE i;I`i'Y GF HUNTliWTON BEACH = lkl ' L A14 OPPO;''Ll) TO THE PROPOSED " TOU'iNLOT ASSLSai-":aiT UI: Ti?ICT'l Signed Date si6ned I M mI• rt.r fVn V.L t f of ,^t.. in tr e ..vrV.,A,...� ASSESDi•il.i+1' iil..il'itlC`1: - 1 f i To:_ TH1: {;ITY C F' i�Uid'1'I'i:i 'Uct IT CH P:?uLD '1'0 ' ,H;. rl0;,,yL0T 1 Signed J Date sined mr,.;rr- rvn T 0::1'.r � j•'t.- iii tLiC n.v ;. ivi ASSr;S-t�i T Dl.`;`C'at ul-: } Prioii „ r 3 �30 3 l 3 To: THE CITY OF :1U TINGTON. is :riCH E' I.I I All L�tON-:�D lli 1!ii; Y;.OpU-ED " 101'4'iiLOT �iSSF,SS::i;i:T DI-::RICT!! r Signed Date sined I own � 0 ` r t. in the TOu R LOT A,SSr;SS, c, I' ---aTRIG`l'. F To: THE CITY OF ",UNTIMTOX aa-' CH .. I Aii UPPOSLD TO ` UL Pi;oFOSED " TWhiLOT s ASSr'SSru;itiT JJ.aTR -.^.T" r . Signed Date signed 72 { I own A0 e Ft. in the TOWNLOT ASSESS;,r'r+'T Dl bTRICT. PHONE 1 J � `j.I 1•+ C ITY OF 11VI'W`1lHG'i'UA t.%Cd1 J(1 ,4 t � I AI•; `i'U Trii:; pttOPOSEL " '1'U414LUT {E! ASSl�.`.iui•li:L'f`i J)l::i`l'1i1.C'1''t i �j I • 5 i Si(r ed t Date si-ned F Y Ft. in the TUtiiI1LOT ' I oc�n S ASS Z;1'.C,ii i To:. TPAL C211Y C;F iiUIITIAUTON BEiiCA r I. -AN CPPU;-i: D TO THE e2OPOSLD " TO,riiLOi' • ASS�Slhl`i-..ill' t)lul'::1C`?'" ( i Date signed -7 —" I o a -�� Ft. in the TO:Tdi.Cl' . � 1 To: THE GIi'Y OF I ii11 Ui-rOS:;D 4, t'�i ,'ti J.1:; ::i:C', ' 1 � Date fined. I 01:'n ^t. In the ` S ( _ t To: THE CITY OF aU vTINGTOIi ij&XH 1 I A14 GYr'OS::D `i'G 1'ti Y ,GrOSi�D " `i'Otti T , ASSESSku:i 7: :3I:;1'RICTrr F Signed t. Date -sizned i I 01721 Ft. Zile TO iiiLOT. i ASSi;SSi•�'�Y ula7.`itlr:'1'.. PllOI'IL it `S�o tod To: THE GB'Y OF -,iWiTINGTON dE1 Cll i R 1 A1•j OPPOZ;LD '1'Ci '1'1jL 1'l1VrVNLD " IOVVLOT u;i•1T lll U•i'RICT" 1 Date cigned A)n,�. ;� X otivn _ 00 Ft. in the TOWNLOT. A S.Sr:SSi' v'J' J)I a;'hIC'L'. PRONE ZK To:- THE CITY OF HUNTINIUTOI. IiI::�CH ' I /`,t•1 OPPUc;*LD TO THE iRW, ) " `r0,oNLOT ASS:: `1 1)1;i .L'ICT / onea Date signed 7 � k r y y• A. vaiFr J. •'1J.NVl -�a ' u a3 (�- ;iOl�i:�rt . _ k To: THE CITY OF HUNTiiiuTU l ti 1CH r T r N T 1 I: J11l GPPJ:; �L' I'0 lliE i'Riii'OS:�1� TG�r-j�iLOL � Signe Date signed ;oig • T Own 6 1•- lii VA& iV1lUJV1 s ASS�.5,5L•u:�i'1' tLls`i'iZI`.:'1': �. l , PHGi`I ;;r" 16 QSA To.: THE CITY OF hU14TINGTUV LEACR + I AR UPI'04iLD '20 Tti Pr?OPOSED It `10?�riLOT Date signed- j Orin Ft. in the TOWELOT !` �►..i.51•:aSI•iL'ii`I' 11I:.il'IiIC`l'. ' TO: THi; CITY 01' tiU11TIEUTUN dE/,CH � yy j I. AM UP2"'0,6ED r1?0 `1'1'li. I'1{GP0 ►F.i " '1'V 71{LCY1' � t ASSI;SS•1Li�i' i]TaTI{rC•i'" � Urban &eco _ ctio pn } j Sued a { .Steven L. Butcher, A.V.P. Date signed Mar�m;1g75 i I Orin 200 Ft. in the TO►;1VLOT � ASS�,:.SSl•.t,1r 1' �i:::l'itI C`l'. . PROVE tt (213) 670-0150 r ' To:. THE CITY OF HU11ITIiiUTUN BEACH I. AN CPPO;:!ID `�O THE t t�POSr;D " TO, ��iILOT ASSl;S;ar,::,i`1' SIa`l'::IvT" ; Signed Date signed ? '7 ryn t jr j PRO11Lif 7 F . i. f To: THE CITY OF riWiTIi1GTON. -6P CH i I. Ai�i GP-OSLD `l ) lhE P� iOrOSLD " TOrriyLOT f AS61;65Iu iT l)i6`1'RICT" Signed 7r� Date signed _ Vt. in the TO'IiitLU"'� I own T' � ASar:SS;:r�+'i' D1:aTRI':T,. • r . . ( i To: THE CITY OF aU r`i'Ii1G1'uPi 1sD, ',C1j I A!a 0F'1 CS: D 11'U `i'i" : i'::U;✓U VE,1) " I'GiiIyLOT } Signed i Date limed 3--/ ? -7_s ' I own ..S U Ft. in the TOi'111LOT. f 1 e � G�� G/�/7..� P130!•!L it .5 36-3��'S d-7 try.7 Q r To: THE CITY OF :,U iTINGTON tr to u' o r tr I AM OPPOBLD TU `1'liL P.;OP0 LD " `1OViVLOT �. Er to G F� j AS,SLSSI•i ;irT D1:..,TR1CT'� Signed F L- G r` t tv t" t• i Date signed 2?/%��> C` p µ N r fD m G I I o►:'n � •.� Ft. in the T06`iivLOT" t� R� y ASSr;SS lr;e�:l` J16TRIr:'1'. x � P130i..j C. bo y m � - I. To: I w CITY or y u I. AM W?iy,)4:ED TO T, 1.11 -PO,ai:J " Tk".)1:i`1LO`i' Date signed -:3-/al i i 1 0Vn 5a _Ft. in the Tur•4'11LOT . � ti.SSisa$I•i�'+`1' i)la'1':ZICT. - • JrHGl�r', tt_ 8q4 t 1 ' To: THE ;;.i'TY C& KUJ1TR4-aTO i BEj.C'1 I. All OPP��;s:LD '1.0 iii. 1'RGPOSED TO°��ivLG'�' Date signed • I Ci 1 1 V. .V it Va..L l./„�•l,di ASS.4 55,W li`ai:'1' PRONE i r I + To: THE. CITY OF HUNTINGTOi: Br;liCH I. All CPPO-,I D -1.0 T ASS_:,SS :,i�T DI:;T:{ICTit s Signed rip I Dat ai ;ned ,� 7 I^orm. in the TU►";i+LOT Pii0I1L' �=�_� •_ TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 7 3--01 EIR 4 24-7 Tr+n��+ M. Tooker. DATE 2-19-75 PAGE PARA COMMT:rIT^ PAGE 1 nF i 14 . 1. All recurring costs to maintain this area should be paid for by the landowners. Txannle - landscape and parking stall painting Maintenance should be entirely borne by those people inhabiting the special district. mhe rest of the residents of Huntington Beach should not have to financially support this area. . 15 Fig. 6 Other considerations should be given to .the design aspects of that area between 22nd Street and Goldenwest. Access to the .westerly lots should neither be off the alley nor off Goldenwest. Noise along Goldenwest .will .be a problem, and two-story dwellings should be prohibited. The amendment .to the Land Use. Flement proposes. one-way traffic on Orange and. Palm' — the noise problem there will be as. great if not greater than on Goldenwest. 136 The Specific Plan ordinance should be removed from the EIR. It is not to .be approved by the Environmental Review Board. The ordinance needs much more work and I would not like to transmit Appendix A to the City Council , implying that it has the ERB bles- sing and. that the ordinance implements those environmental issues set forth in the EIR. General : High-rise alternatives have not been. adequately explored. •A-`high-rise specific plan May be better -suited in this area. n -16- - AIR QUALITY 1973 (California Standards) CALIFORNIA DAYS CALIFORNIA STANDARD EQUALED OR. EXCEEDED OLLUTANT AIR QUALITY COSTA EL COUNTY MAXIMUM STANDARD ANAHEIM MESA LA HABRA TORO WIDE REASONS FOR AIR QUALITY STANDARD READING OXIDANT Prevention of eye irritation and possible INCLUDING 0.10 PPM FOR 1 74 67 120 39 137 impairment of lung function in persons •38 ppm OZONE HR• with chronic pulmonary disease. NITROGEN 0.25 PPM FOR 1 Possible health effects could occur at . DIOXIDE HR. 12 6 14 2 20 slightly higher dosage. .51 ppm (NO2) Produces atmospheric discoloration. 10 PPM AVG. FOR CARBON 12 HRS. 7 16 22 0 29 Prevention of interference with oxygen 17 ppm HONOXIDE (.CO) 40 PPM FOR 1 HR. 0 0 0 0 0 transport by blood. 30 ppm SULFUR U.U4 PPM 24 HRS. . 2 1 4 1 8 .043 ppm DIOXIDE Prevent of increase in chronic (S02) 0.50 PHMR FOR 1 0 0 0 0 0 respiratory desease on long term exposure ,17 ppm LEAD 1 .5 ,ug/m3 30 12 5 12 0 12 Higher levels have shown progressive (Pb) DAY AVG. months months months months increase in storage of lead in body. 4.4 )ag/m3 60 ,ug/m3 ANNUAL 98.0 69 122 71 •Avg' AO Long continued exposure iay be associated SUSPENDED GEOMETRIC MEAN ug/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 /m3 88 with chronic respiratory disease. 122 pg/m3 PARTICLES (AGM} �g Pg/m3 Exposure to a combination of suspended particles and sulfur dioxide may produce 3 47% of 21% 68% 22%- . 39% acute illness. 3 100 ,ug/m 345 pg/m 24 HR. AVG. Days Z 100 ,ug/ * Highest reading averaged over period prescribed by air quality standard. i Table 4 N • r AIR QUALITY FOR 1973 AIR MONITORING STATIONS FEDERAL COUNTY POLLUTANT AIR QUALITY ANAHEIM COSTA MESA LA HABRA, EL TORO WIDE STANDARD * Ds Max. * Days ** Max. * Days ** Max. . * Days ** Max. Oxidant 0.08 ppm - (Ozone) for 1 hr. .87 .32 ppm 86 .26 ppm 132 .38 ppm 45 .24 ppm 153 Nitrogen" 0.25 ppm Dioxide for 1 hr. 12 ` .49 ppm 6 .29 ppm 14 .51 ppm 2.• .30 ppm 20 (NO2) (Calif. Std.-) Carbon 9 ppm 22 15 ppm 24 16 ppm 79 20 ppm 0.. :7 ppm '.86 -Monoxide 8 hr. avg. (CO) 35 ppm . .0 22-ppm 0 26 ppm 0 . 30 ppm 0 12 ppm 0 for 1- hr. Sulfur 0:14 _ppm Dioxide 24 hr. avg. 0- _ .04 ppm 0. .04 ppm 0 .04 ppm 0 .63 ppm 0 (S02) Particulate 260 ug/m3 :1_ 345 0 185 0 252 . 0 217: 1 Matter 24 hr. avg.. Jug/m3 Jug/m3 Jug/m3 UgIm3 - Hydrocarbons 0.24 ppm (Corrected 3 hr. avg. - - - - - -for Methane) Lead 1.5 ug/m3 - _ 4.4 - 3.8 - 4.4 - 1.3 - . (Pb) 30 day avg.. Jug/m3 dug/m3 lug/m3 lug/m3 (Calif. Std.) IR POLLUTION HEALTH -WARNINGS * Days - Number of days standard exceeded.. ** .Max. Maximum reading in terms of Air Quality Standar Pollutant WarninR Level Warnings Issued Oxidant 0.20 ppm .20 - Table, 4 . rn 0 RESPONSE TO ORANGE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COMMENTS 1. Page= 35 : Table 4 , which summarizes Orange County air quality, is based on 1972 data. A new Table 4 , calculated on the basis of 1973 data, is substituted in its place. A table of Federal and California air quality standards for 1973 is added to Table 4. Both tables appear on pages 14 and 15 of this addendum. Page 36 , paragraph 1: The report states that Orange County air quality is relatively high. This statement should be qualified by the 1973 data in Table 4 . The California oxi- dant standard was exceeded in Costa Mesa in 1972 on only 29 days, and increased to 67 days in 1973. Moreover, the more stringent Federal standard was exceeded on 86 days in Costa Mesa in 1973. A recent compilation of 1974 data by the Orange County Air Pollution Control District shows it in- creased to 93 days in 1974 . Thus , while Orange County may have relatively high air quality, the air has become increas- ingly degraded over the past several years. 2 . Page 36 , paragraph 1 , and Page 38 , paragraph 1: .The 1975 automobile emission standards have been delayed to at least 1978 in California, and may be further delayed to encourage an increase in fuel economy. Emissions will still decline, but not as fast as previously expected. The vehicle popula- tion will continue to increase, and as a result the proposed project will contribute to the cumulative degradation of air quality in Orange County. This trend will probably con- tinue until emission regulations become effective and alternate modes of transportation are explored. 3. Page 38, paragraph 2 : The report concludes that the project will be exempt from indirect source review because less than 1,000-car parking capacity is accommodated by proposed parking courts and street markings. In addition, parking capacity will not increase by 500 cars. Compared to the parking capacity of the district without the project, the proposed improvements yield a net decrease of 139 spaces. These conclusions reflect the position of the Huntington Beach Environmental Resources Department. An opinion from the Environmental Protection Agency may be required to resolve potential interpretation conflicts of the issue. n 0 -13- . O , H. G. OSBORNE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER 0 UNTY OF TELEPHONE: 774-02/4 AREA CODE 714 © AN G E 1010 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, 92606 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT February 13, 1975 IIUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT Environmental Review Board P.O. Box 190 r !_.R I 1 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P. O. Box 190 Attn: Mr. James Palin 14unUng4an Beach, Calif. 92648 Subject: Draft EIR 74-07 on Townlot Assessment District No. 73-01 .Dear Mr. Palin: Although the EIR is adequate with respect to air quality, I am submitting comments and information to improve the accuracy of the report. The EIR includes a summary of 1972 air quality data, published by the Orange County Air Pollution Control District, which gives the number of days the California air quality standards were exceeded. I have attached for your use a 1973 air quality summary because it is more recent and because the air quality is compared to both the Federal and California air quality standards. Please note that while the California oxidant standard was exceeded in Costa Mesa in 1972 on only 29 days, the more stringent Federal standard was exceeded on 86 days in Costa Mesa in 1973. A recent compilation of 1974 data shows it increased to 93 days in 1974. On pages 36 and 38 the report talks about the expected reductions in auto- mobile emissions because of the stringent 1975 emission standards. However, 1975 automobile emission standards were delayed to at least 1978 in Calif- ornia, and may be further delayed to encourage an increase in fuel economy. Emissions from automobiles will still decline, but not as fast as originally planned. Finally, the report concludes that the project is exempt from indirect source review. While this may be, it is not clear cut, and an opinion from EPA might be necessary to resolve the issue. Because of a delay in the effective date of indirect source review to June 3.0, 1975, the project will be exempt if. construction begins in May or June 1975 as planned. Sincerely yours, H. G. OSBORNE Air Pollution Control Officer Martin Kay Air Pollution Control Engineer M1C/ad -12- RESPONSE TO ORANGE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Page 59 , paragraph 3: A previous experiment in the Townlot to employ cul-de-saced streets was an impressive failure. The experiment consisted of constructing an artificial cul- de-sac and parking court at one residential street in the developed portion of the Townlot. The Department of Public Works erected temporary barriers at the street ends, thus preventing through traffic. A row of parking spaces was marked along the center of the street. Spaces were angled at 45 degrees. Two lanes of traffic flanked the row of parking spaces with a turnaround provided at the cul-de-saced street end. As a result, access to parking spaces occurred from two possible directions. The parking design imposed immediate problems: If a vehicle was parked in a space angled toward the cul-de-sac and all other spaces were filled, exit was difficult. To leave the parking court, a vehicle either backed out of the space and made a turnaround at the cul-de-sac or moved directly for- ward out of the space onto the egress traffic lane. The former situation was inconvenient because of the time delay of turning around at the cul-de-sac; the latter situation was inconvenient because of the angled parking spaces which required almost a full turnaround onto a narrow traffic lane (each lane was about 15 feet in width) . Another problem involved the attitudes of the participating residents. People accustomed to grid traffic circulation opposed the constraints of cul-de-sac circulation and the inconveniences of the parking courts. The proposed cul-de-sac plan of the assessment district minimizes the problems of the previous experiment. Parking spaces are arranged in two rows, each adjacent to the street curbs (see Figures 3 and 5 in draft EIR) . Spaces are marked at 90 degree angles to the curbs. This design permits im- proved maneuverability of vehicles and easy departure from the parking court. Turnarounds at the cul-de-sac and the radii of back-outs from the 90 degree spaces are minimized. The implementation of the proposed cul-de-sac plan in a predominantly undeveloped area minimizes potential opposition from local residents. Future residents will probably have a more favorable perception of cul-de-sac circulation, since they will have the choice of living or not living in an area which they know to have such a street and parking arrange- ment. Moreover, the planning staff expects the cul-de-sac plan to serve as a model for the rest of the Townlot. -11- Page Two Mr. James W. Palin February 5, 1975 prompt and courteous service from myself or Harold M. Keple of my staff by calling (714) 834-2439 Very truly yours, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY Richard . Munsell , Assistant Director Planning JohWAlld'y, Planner Environmental Services Section JLA/HMK/jma cc: Reading File City EIR 75-3 File --10- IILINTINGTON BEACH p PLANNING DEPARTMENT o IJNTY OF P. O. Box 190 AN G E Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TELEPHONE: 834-2300 AREA CODE 714 AGENCY 400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST MAILING ADDRESS: February 5, 1975 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 4048 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 H. G. OSBORNE niPFC YOR PILE 3 a Mr. James W. Palin, Secretary Environmental Review Board P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Palin: SUBJECT: EIR 75-3: "Townlot Assessment District No. 73-01" (City EIR 74-7) We appreciate your invitation to review and comment on the subject EIR as submitted by your office, January 14, 1975. Although the location and general scope of this project has minor direct significance to County concerns, the following comments are offered herein to possibly aid in the finalization of the EIR. The main concern of the Planning Department centers about a key statement made on page 59 of your EIR: "A previous experiment in Huntington Beach to employ cul-de-sated streets was an impressive failure." Though the proposed assessment district is planned to eliminate piecemeal and costly installations of facilities as the area develops, the cul-de-sac circu- lation plan suggested for this townlot plan follows the identical character of the project which ended as an "impressive failure." Assurance that the faults of the earlier project have been corrected for in this plan could add immeasurably in the acceptance of this proposed townlot plan. A list of shortcomings and proposed mitigating measures to directly overcome these known deficiencies of this cul-de-saced circulation design, along with additional alternatives that directly cope with these deficiencies could be of beneficial use when finalizing the EIR. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, you may anticipate -9- ' 1 ' RESPONSE TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT COMMENTS 1. Page 74 , paragraphs 1 and 2 : City-wide effluent rate, including commercial and industrial uses (rate=total flow/population) , is about 118 gallons per day per person. This figure is based on an effluent rate of 59 gallons per person per day with a peak- ing factor of 2. It is used by the California Department of Water Resources and the Huntington Beach Department of Public Works. Moreover, it represents a worst possible impact on sewage facilities. At this rate, the assessment district will increase the loading on sanitary treatment facilities by . 262 million gallons per day (MGD) , or about . 17 percent of present load, . 14 percent of average capacity, .08 percent of peak capacity, and . 81 percent of present reserves. All are insig- nificant. The Orange County Sanitation District identifies the ultimate land use for the project area as low density residential with a daily flow coefficient of 1,550 gallons per day per acre, or about . 090 MGD for the entire district. We believe this rate is too low because of the medium-density residential developments occurring in the area and the density incentives allowed by the Specific Plan. A more probable effect on sewage facilities is derived from Figures 20 and 21. Total sewage effluent is estimated at .273 cubic feet per second (cfs) , or about . 176 MGD. As a result, sanitation plant loading will increase by .11 percent of present load, . 09 percent of average capacity, .05 percent of peak capacity, and .55 percent of present reserves. -8- ei�a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AREA CODE 7 4 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 962-2411 P. O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 10844 ELLIS AVENUE (EUCLID OFF-RAMP, SAN DIEGO FREEWAY) January 29, 1975 1:U?1':;..:TON DEAC;-. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD PLANNING oEPARTMIEN i City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 P. 0. Box 190 Hcnti�l;,�c:1 Bench, Ca"f. 9^_r1�' Attention: James Palin, Secretary Subject : Assessment District No. 73-01 The above project is in Orange County Sanitation District No. 11. The ultimate land use for the project area is shown as low density residential. This designation has a daily flow coefficient .of 1550 gallons per day per acre . If there may be any questions, please feel free to call. ames Wybenga Industrial & Permit Division JW:mw -7- Figure 21 ' .14 cfs from .......................................................... Beachwalk 8" tine ................... .. a m venue •' ..; y .014 .014 . 014 \- . 014 .014 c a c i enle ;:•:•:- o J • 40028 0.028 .028 y ®.028 • .17 .#028 •. ?•.;. :• Aft L y .048 .048 .048 .048 .22 �.001 • " arange Aven 'r•. 5 .... ...... ....... . .............. % ............... : ...... . ...... •. ...... ..... . ................ :............... . :.............. . .........:...•.. . ..... .vw. .............. % ............. . ..... .......... . ...... S. •� .:••::•�:• • •::::::•:•:::::•� • :•::1:::::::•::•: :• •i•:::::f::::::• : •:::::�::�•�•:�• •.' ::::•�.1 .{.•.�� • Sea 1 '�f 12" 1 ne . .. • • _ • • . 57 •. 068 JtLy •.068 1 0.068 . 1 • .24 011 0 $ Olive Avenue 4J • • • • ® w • o . 60 .092 �. . .092 . 092 .27 .033 Alfinut Avenu • 6lx . � 62 10 . 73 . 10� . 84 .10� . 95 .29� . 25 035 1.2 U r• i 01 r 01� .0 . 0 .0],, O 1� -Pacific Coast Highway. • • City Sewer Line County Trunkline. SEWAGE FLOW IN AND AROUND ................... . Assessment District THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AT • ••••••••.'•••cfs Cubic Feet Per Second ITS ULTIMATE POPULATION U O _6_ JLAL --� �iltl�llllli !IIII M .. � �11 NNA�IgA gIINMIHII �dgtINIINp uNNNlgd �INtWl9 IIIN 111i11�Nl1 NUUUIIIIII� !fItIN�N �NaU11H IIIIMI® I ,I � 1� NdIIUNIAI NNIf�IIHft dNUI flUfN11NUUltAdU i1l#�i ;SIN,HIINHIfiIU�HIIUIigNh� 911NUINWr•HI111�HlI �dNltlll � t�'UUIIIIAAN IHIgMNbk dlgl�gq �NNltllll � � �M INNIgNHq IUtNUNtNI MNgHI�q NNUyttNll IIINtgIgIH ;� �� NiigNN unuNlllk aq� q�gAq gAtlUlU1N gHNNIgIH - Ida (FOUND Himullup CHI IIH NpIIFHlllll NIIIN�N Iln ��IINN Hglll�hq 'alln�IIU�NNIIIINHq EUINNHNN" � Im INN liflifto HHHNUNH nNaUNaN NNIIHNIIH . INI IINAIAIHN HNIIIIHIIp � I�IIIgNq ggIIHAqN INN '2411„4 ;1Htimimn MR RNHANgN HIq�gItN �dH11AAAA IIIIIAIIIIH HHIIAIiAN MN aNltllll HUNNNIUI qqH HIIgyNI1N IgIit1UIINl ;m � �tlgitN iigNUN� -dAH�tHi gIIMIIHIIN NUNANAIi M Vol InS 10111 IIIN AlA�I1N)gHll�ll#1 �dHtIbANN IIN11111111�!�gHHANAN i 1N 1NUNINNWIIINII NIIUUIIIIII�lII�'�IHgilIIlllll 1�N1', , i � INI gNgANIIN glH�lllll IINII�'NgbNNIIN`•AItIARRI IIAi • � NIA N�NNUlN Hillllllll� •Ill�gll lIIllllp�dlllllll IHMd �1 nNHANAN HIIIIIIUHF�r /111111 Nall IRWi INN MNNiNgI!' gIINiNIhN mm 1111111 NDMI 111 .I � �U ��Iilt�` N,i�Nlll � tt11�11 IfltlU11fB �illll6 a till-NNHNN!lA 1 _ � oltI1NN1 IllMltlll :>l�� . . m 11�1�Np'a�NIIN ilfslNll� 1N1�91A :�', .. , Neu Nlow ;mm Illlllll �Illllltl Iitllllil! SIN !1 pAmIt U - - _ I J 1 flog F AIIf BTIlIll1N� �' , �� IiIA �11 IIN �Atttd� INS III�IH , 'l a NU11 (HI UNNIINII �nl I1NNItUs� INS At3N I , a )qm allow .III �►' 10. Page 110, paragraph 2 : Change the last sentence to read: "It' is recommended that the final design of -residential buildings and foundations consider specific ground motion characteristics, and that a structural engineer approve final• project plans. " 11. Page 112 , paragraph 1: Add: "If the water is of acceptable quality, it will be discharged into the storm drain system per City requirements. " 12. Page 124 : _ Add to Alternative IV: "It is the opinion of the City Public Works Department. that the Townlot Plan can- it not occur in piecemeal fashion without expensive• temporary v off-site work if 'development occurs in less than block parcels. The proposed street configurations will require .extensive regrading of the streets to provide proper drain- age. As a result of these circumstances, the assessment district improvements must be adopted if the .-Specific Plan is to succeed. " 13. Page 148 : Sewage information _in the first and second para- graphs of the 1973 inter-department communication is no longer correct. Sewage flow rates are revised. in Figures 20 and 21. -4- a REVISIONS AND COMMENTS SUBMITTED BY HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Page 3 , paragraph 1: Change the third sentence to read: "Storm drains to be installed as part of the project will alleviate future runoff problems , but will result in over- loading problems on the 22nd Street drainage line which also serves the area north of the assessment district. " 2. Page 16 , paragraph 3: Delete or approximately two inches of rainfall per hour. " 3. Page 24 , paragraph 2 : Delete at 22nd Street. " 4. Page 69 , paragraph 2 : Change the second and third senten- ces to read: "Each of these 8-inch lines can sustain a flow of . 5 to . 65 cubic feet per second (cfs) , which is equivalent to the requirements of about 2 ,700 to 3,500 people per acre. Each area of development contributing to an 8-inch main from Palm to Pacific Coast Highway can be expected to contribute about . 13 cfs to the County system. " Change the fifth sentence to read: "Using the assumption that only the assessment district contributes to liquid waste load, the loading on the 8-inch sewer lines will range from about 10 to 40 percent of capacity at ultimate develop- ment, using Figure 21. " 5. Page 71, Figure 20 : Sewage flow rates are invalid. A re- vised Figure 20 is substituted in its place, and appears on page 5 of this addendum. 6. Page 72, Figure 21: Sewage flow rates are invalid. A revised Figure 21 is substituted in its place, and appears on page 6 of this addendum. 7 . Page 73 , paragraph 1: Change the last two sentences to read: "The portion of Huntington Seacliff that can be expected to contribute to the assessment district facilities is not fully developed. It currently contributes approximately .5 cfs, part of which is from Beachwalk (portions of Beachwalk sewer into the. Seacliff_ sewer system) . Effluent from Beachwalk sewering south into the assessment district is . 14 cfs. " 8 . Page 73 , paragrpah 2 : Change the fifth sentence to read: "However, its contribution along with effluents from surround- ing developments will overload parts of the system if updating of the system does not occur. " 9. Page 105 , paragraph 3 : Change the last sentence to read: "If the water is of acceptable quality, it will be discharged into the storm drain system per City requirements. " -3- FOE CITY OF HUNTIN�i7�ON B1ACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MUNTIWMN BEACH To Jim Palin From H. E. Hartge Subject EIR 74-7 Townlot Assessment Date March 3, 1975 District Transmitted herewith is a copy of the subject EIR in which comments/corrections to the report are indicated on the various pages. Please note the information supplied by this Department on sewer systems in 1973, is no longer valid. We have studied the area and have indicated the correct information on the appropriate pages. It is the opinion of this Department that if the Townlot assessment district fails, the concepts set forth in the EIR cannot be implemented on a piecemeal bases. This position is based on the proposed street configurations which require extensive regrading of the streets to provide proper drainage. If small parcels develop under the concept without the assessment district, expensive temporary off site work will be required. . E. Hart Director o�Public Works HEH:WEH:ae Trans. The addendum which follows has been prepared to answer comments on the proposed Townlot Assessment District No. 73-01. The following responses are cross-referenced to the page numbers in the draft report and are in- tended to supplement the text and constitute the revised final report. The format of this addendum includes the pre- sentation of the comments and the answers in a sequential order. -1- DuPRTNIENT r,hAR 2 U 1�7 P. 0. nv, Jw. ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 74-7 TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01 Prepared for City of Huntington Beach, California ' Prepared by City of Huntington Beach . Department of Environmental Resources MARCH 1975 A/s7 HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAN 16 1975 ` P. 0. Box 190 mun}in&on Beach, Calif. 92"S ORAF"T snwn'Tongnantal nn%pact TCe a� o @ ON " TOWNLOT " ASSESSMENT OISTRICT NO. 73-01 CITY OF HUNTINC3T0IV BEACH, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT O©- e,el5T. C/TYOFHf/NT/NO7ZW E'��f/e�luvcrtRY 0 ,sty"yE io 'O`j`— geop--SED C/z7 of gzrvi/MGTovvBEACH�Y1,vQ9RY f�,Cf!�JNG4�Y �X/S7.C/iY oFHuNl/NG'ir�il-� 8ASOV BO"a4RY 0 ANNEXATION AT WARNER AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Beginning at a point in the northeasterly line of that certain strip of land one hundred feet in width conveyed by the Bolsa Land Company to Pacific Electric Rail- way Company by a deed recorded in Book 92, page 306 of Deeds, Records of Orange County, California, said point lies on the north line of the south one-half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 30, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, said point also being an angle point in the existing City of Huntington Beach boundary line as established by City Ordinance Number 1126, effective May 11, 1965; thence north 89° 12' 26" east along said north line of the south one-half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 30 a distance of 386.98 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the northwesterly prolongation of the northeasterly right of way line of Pacific Coast Highway as described in a deed granted to the State of California on November 25, 1929, recorded in Book 331, page 160 of Official Records of said Orange County, said right of way being on a curve concave to the northwest and having a radius of 3050 feet, a radial line through said intersection bears north 49. 16' 31" east# na*d,Aaint of intersection also being an angle point in the existing City of Huntington Beach boundary line a8 established by City Ordinance number 919 and 920, effective August 21, 1962; thence southeasterly along said curve a distance of 336.68 feet, more or less, to a point on a tangent line; thence continuing along said right of way line south 34. 241 00" east 759.15 feet, more or less, to a tangent curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 2950 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 9° 04' 00", a distance of 466.82 feet more or less, to a point, said point being an angle point in the before described existing City of Huntington Beach boundary, ordinance number 1126; thence leaving before described right of way line south 46° 32' 00" west a distance of 90.00 feet, more or less, along before mentioned existing City of Huntington Beach Boundary, ordinance number 1126, to a point, said point being an angle point in said existing boundary line, said point also being in the northeasterly line of the Pacific Electric Railway Company right of way, recorded in Book 92, page 306 of Deeds, Records of said (range County, said point also being AL*tant south 430 28' 00" east 315.34 feet from the most southerly corner of the parcel of land deeded to Los Angeles Inter-Urban Railway Company, recorded in Deed Book 108, page 200, Records of said Orange County; thence north 430 28. 00" east 1815.34 feet, more or less, along the before mentioned northeasterly line of the Pacific Electric Railway Company right of may,, said line also being the before described existing City of Huntington Beach Boundary, Ordinance number 1126, to the point of beginning. ILA & City of Huntington Beach DOVI_E .,Off er A dnu n i,t rat Tv.• Otfn•rr BRAN^ER D. CASTLF P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 .11isunistr t r D'-)N P. BON F A 01V ASU1rnt•v C OIN CILM EN WAr ,EN G. HALL AL V 'A COEN• btA•C F. Ir.•a-ur-r N. .1`.. •`a V.V. GHEF•1 .�4�,. C. JON ES TECi •iARL ETT r� L'11V CIerk DR : NRY S F,At.F•A:,.a October 22, J__/ J[•r•4. A. MArNE . GF'7"• GE C. "i. CRAr'r t1 CQ ; TN AL S.- I_EI State Lands Commission 217 West First Street room 305 Los Angeles , California. 90012 gentlemen: We are considering annexation of a small piece of property wh1c:n lies within the general perimeter of the City of Huntington Beach and is located to the west or on the ocean side of Pacific Coast Highway, south of Warner Avenue. Between this piece .of prop- erty and the mean high tide line on the ocean front is other property which has previously been annexed by Huntington Beach . Enclosed is a map of the propcsed area and we are interested in learning whether your department con- siders this particular piece of property as tide lands . If it is so interrupted by your commission, the City of Huntington Beach requests permission to annex same in the near future . The property in question is presently owned by the Southern Pacific Railroad and is part of a, piece whiLch is under con- demnation proceedings by the State of Ca.lifornia.. It would be appreciated if you would look into this matter and let us know the status as soon as possible . Sincerely- yours Paul C . Jon s City Clerk PCJ:pa Enclosure JAMES R. WHEELER JOHN SELTZER OLLIN C. CLEVELAND KENNETH A. REYNOLDS Director of Public Works Police Chief Building Director Planning Director VINCENT G. MOORHOUSE FRANK B. ARQUELLO RAYMOND PICARD Director Harbors, WALTER W. JOHNSON NORM WORTHY Finance Director Fire Chief Beaches& Development Library Director Recreation& Parks Director RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BOARD COMMENTS 1. Page 14 , paragraph 1: The Huntington Beach Department of Public Works is proposing a maintenance district. The maintenance district boundaries would be the same as the assessment district limits. All recurring costs to main- tain the area, such as landscaping and parking stall painting, will be assessed against the property owners in the maintenance district. 2. Page 114 , paragraph 3: As part of a planned unit develop- ment, the advanced planning staff believes that the alley ; between Goldenwest and 22nd Street offers the only suitable access to lots along Goldenwest Street. The property owner will dedicate 15 feet along Goldenwest. The City could abandon the alley to allow for its inclusion in the planned development. 3. Page 118 , paragraph 1: Noise along Goldenwest will be a .problem. As an additional mitigation measure, two-story dwellings should be prohibited along Goldenwest only. The amendment to the Land Use Element proposes one-way traffic on Orange and Palm. If ' noise levels exceed 60 dB(A) at L50 with already proposed mitigation measures-, a wall should be considered along Palm and Orange to attenuate traffic .noise, and two-story dwellings adjacent to these arterials .should be .prohibited. • a -17- z Too Environmental Resources Department From& EIR Review Committee of the Environmental Council Dates February ,25, 1975 Topics General Comments on EIR 74-7 , Townlot Assessment District The EIR Review Committee has very briefly reviewed the EIR for the Townlot Assessment District 73-01, as prepared by the En- vironmental Resources Department, and has the following general comments to make. 1. It would be in the better interest of good planning and community improvement to consider the ENTIRE Townlot area, not just the least-developed corner. 2. This project would be 'growth-inducing--encouraging develop- ment at a faster rate than would probably otherwise occur because the utilities and many amenities would be in place. 3. With the major portion of this project area under onw ownership, it would appear that the proposed design with eul-de- sacs ect. and utility installation could .be carried out and a quality PD developed without special arrangements as described here. Before storm drains, sewer lines and underground utilities are modified for this small area, the needs for the entire area must be more carefully planned. 4. Density increases should CJCT be allowed as an incentive to develop an already densely-planned area. While the econo- mics of such development may be beneficial to the school district, the social and educational impact` to the students crowding into an over-crowded situation would be adverse. 5. As a mitigating measure it is stated that a siltation structure for the storm drain could be installed--we recommend that it MUST be installed. There have been complaints for many years by beachgoers about the "extraneous" material that gets onto the beaches from the storm drain outlets. Even the mud and dirt from "inland" is a part ofthis extraneous material that does not belong on the public beaches. Consideration should be given to continuing the stormdrain into the water area after litter and silt are removed, for reducing the adverse impact on the beach. 6. The EIR Committee recommends that there be more attention given to the recreational open space in the dense Townlot area, with the 17th and Orange Center now being in essentially private use the needs of the community in that area are not being met. 7 . Mitigation measures should also include minimizing dirt and mud that accumulates -on the streets due to earth moving, causing safety hazards, and degrading the area. -I8- 8. Since. the primary benefit to the public through this project is to upgrade the appearance in this area, the EIR p Committee would definitely recommend that the undergroudding o of utilities be includedt with more than one landowner, it might not be necessary for individual subprojects to do this, ' and, too, the problems and mess of doing it later would be far greater than initial installation. It is felt that the public benefit would be greater with utilities undergrounded (adjacent to the two proposed Scenic Highway areas--Goldenwest Street and near Pacific Coast Highway) than with uniformly installed landscaping, though a total landscaping plan would be very beneficial to reduce the "hodge-podge" character. of other portions of the Townlot. 9. As a further mitigation measure to reduce the adverse impact on wildlife, trees and shrubs should be selected that are beneficial to wildlife, and would encourage some of those displaced during construction to return, as well as others to find a place to live. o -19- RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL COMMENTS 1. Page 128 , paragraph 1: If the current Specific Plan/Assessment District is successful, a similar approach will be proposed for the area south of Orange Avenue between Seventeenth Street and Goldenwest. A specific plan will later be applied in the developed portion of Townlot east of Seventeenth Street. This piecemeal approach should not be continued with piecemeal envir- onmental impact reports. If an environmental impact report is required for the specific plan/assessment district south of Orange between Seventeenth and Goldenwest , the provisions of Section 15069 (Multiple and Phased Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines should apply to the report' s preparation. In essence, Section 15069 states that the lead agency must prepare a single EIR for the ultimate project (i.e. , the entire Townlot) where an individual project is a precedent for commitment to a larger project with significant environ- mental effect. Specific Plan/Assessment District 73-01 does not clearly estab- lish a precedent for commitment of the project to the rest of Townlot at this time. However, future attempts to expand such improvements and development standards on a piecemeal basis beyond the present assessment district boundaries should be con- strued as intent to ultimately include the entire Townlot. The boundaries of the total project should be clearly defined. and, if required, the environmental impact report should deal with the ultimate project. 2. Page 127 , paragraph 1: The draft environmental impact report adequately addresses the growth-inducing impacts of the project. The project will encourage development at a faster rate than would probably otherwise occur, because off-site improvements would be in place and increased development densities would stimulate the rate of residential growth on-site. 3. Page 9 , paragraph 2 : The proposed assessment district is planned to eliminate piecemeal and costly installation of facilities as the area develops. Installation of the planned improvements will result in a cost-efficient, one-time project which accommo- dates ultimate residential growth of the district and mitigates many of the local adverse effects of such growth. The largest property owner controls 43 percent of the district' s property. The rest of the land area is held by a number of small owners. Present trends in the district show that development decisions have been highly independent, resulting in scattered, piecemeal residential projects. One large landowner and the lack of "special arrangements" (i.e. , the assessment district) will not guarantee a quality planned community. To avoid the problems associated with piecemeal development, it is necessary that the -20- • c • O . cul-de-sac design and utility installation be carried out at one time with other proposed off-site improvements under an assessment district arrangement. 4. Page 49, paragraph 3 : The implications of the density incen- tive have been adequately dealt with in the draft environmental impact report. 5. Page. 112 , paragraph 2 : A siltation structure must be• installed ( at the 22nd Street drainage outfall or at any subsequent I lines emptying into the ocean from the assessment district. Consideration should be given to continuing the storm drain from the assessment district into the ocean after litter and . silt are removed, in order to reduce the adverse effect on the beach. 6. Page 97, paragraphs land 2 : Although the two-acre Recreation Center lies within the assessment district, it is now essen- tially in private use. As . a result, the supply of neighborhood recreational open space is deficient throughout the dense Town- lot area. This deficiency will continue to adversely affect the local recreational needs of assessment district residents until the planned 2 . 5 acre park site at Goldenwest and Palm is accom- plished. Within the greater Townlot, more attention should. be given to providing some continuous areas of recreational open space to compensate the present preoccupation with maximum. residential densities in the area. 7. Page 111: . Mitigation measures will include minimizing dirt and mud that accumulates on the streets due to earth moving, causing safety hazards and degradation of the area. 8. Page 123., paragraph 2 : The planning staff proposes utility un- dergrounding. The environmental effects of this position have been adequately addressed in the draft environmental impact report. The alternative of not undergrounding utilities and the implica- tions of such a decision were also addressed. 19. Page 113 , paragraph 2 : As a mitigation measure to reduce the adverse effect on wildlife, trees and shrubs should be selected �{ that are beneficial to wildlife, encouraging some of those dis- placed by construction to return as well as permitting others to find a place to 'live. . -21- DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 74-7 ON TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 74-01 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Prepared by HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES January, 1975 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Listof Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Synopsis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Authorization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Author . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 • ProjectDescription . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Geology and Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Hydrology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 WaterQuality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 AirQuality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 • Floraand Fauna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Archaeology, Paleontology, Historic Landmarks . . . . . . . . . . . 41 LandUse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Economics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 . Public Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 CommunityServices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 Traffic Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 AcousticalQuality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Recreation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Aesthetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 • Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Mitigation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Alternatives to the Proposed Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Relationship Between Short-term Uses and Long-Term Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 • Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources . . 126 Growth Inducing Impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 ImpactArea Boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 • A. Recommended Specific Plan Ordinance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 B. Correspondence Relating to Formation of A.D. 73-01 . . . 144 C. Consultation Correspondence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 D. Environmental Review Board Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 • • LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE PAGE 1 Vicinity Map of Huntington Beach 7 2 Project Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3 . Proposed Assessment District Improvement Map 11 4 Proposed Assessment District Circulation Map . . . . . . . . . 12 5 Proposed Assessment District Landscaping/Street Section Map 13 6 Proposed Assessment District Utilities Map . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7 ' Huntington Beach Topography Map .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 8 Huntington Beach Fault Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 9 Huntington Beach Geotechnical Land Use Capability Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 10 Tentative Assessment District Drainage -Plan Map . . . . . . 25 11 Townlot Zoning Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 12 Assessment District Existing Land Uses Ma 44 13 Assessment District Oil Pipelines and Wells Map . . . . . . 46 14 Long-Term Land Use Expectations Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 15 Huntington Beach Open Space Values Map 56 16 Assessment District Residential Development Graph . . . . 58 17 City Revenue/Expenditure Per Acre Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 18 Comparison of School Revenue/Expenditure per Acre ofResidential Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 19 Map of Existing Water Lines in the Townlot . . . . . . . . . . . 70 . 20 Map of Existing Sewage Lines in the Townlot . . . . . . . . . . 71 2.1 Assessment District Sewage. Flow Map at Ultimate Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 22 School Capacity. Map of Huntington Beach . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 79 23 Huntington Beach 1973 Traffic Flow Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 24 Huntington Beach Traffic at Ultimate Development . . . . . 87 25 Traffic Flow Prediction Graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 26 Attenuation of Sound by Distance and by Use of Barriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 27 Graph of HUD' s Noise Acceptability Categories for Proposed Housing Sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 28 A-Level Variation During Day and Nighttime . . . . . . . . . . . 94 29 Graph of L50 Plots for Automobiles as a Function of Volume Flow and Average Speed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 30 Park Inventory Map . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 z • • LIST OF TABLES • TABLE TITLE PAGE 1 Water Quality Chart for Various Sources . . . . . . 28 2 Calculated Quantities of Pollutants Which Would Enter Receiving Waters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3 Orange County 1972 Emissions Inventory . . . . . . . 33 4 Orange County 1972 Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 5 California Light Duty Vehicle Exhaust Emission Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 • 6 Predictable Revenue per Acre in Assessment District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 7 Net Gain for Assessment District Expected Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 8 Immediate Abatement Potential of • Construction Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 • • • • • • SYNOPSIS Assessment District 73-01 is located in the northwest corner of the Huntington Beach Townlot area. The district is bounded by Palm. and Orange Avenues , and by 17th and Goldenwest Streets. Improvements proposed as part of this project include com- plete replacement. of dilapidated streets and curbings , installa- tion of parking court/cul-de-sac street ends, sidewalks , street lights, signs , landscaping, and a storm drain system. Also included are the undergrounding of electrical utility lines within the assessment district and of the high voltage power line along Palm Avenue. The project will include development standard revisions which, together with the assessment district improvements , will constitute a specific plan of development for the Townlot assessment district. It is the intention of the project that by providing these improvements and standards revisions at this time, piecemeal expensive projects can be avoided in the future, a planned community appearance can be developed, and existing parking, circulation., and open space problems can be alleviated. The assessment district consists of about 58 acres of land with zoning dominated by residential uses (R-2 and R-3) . The dis- trict is almost one-third residentially developed, with a growing trend toward triplexes and fourplexes. At its present growth rate , complete development may be expected to occur by 1991. However, .the incentives offered by the proposed improve- . -1- • ments and standards revisions (especially allowances for in- creased residential densities on consolidated lots) may result • in a substantially faster rate of growth. Much of the land is still involved with oil production, with most wells prod- ucing only a few barrels per day. As pressure to develop • increases, interest in this marginal production may decrease. Most adverse impacts associated with the construction phase of • the project will be slight and/or temporary in nature. How- ever, potential significant adverse impacts on subsurface oil pipelines and paleontological/archaeological resources will • exist as the drainage trunkline and utility trenches extend from 2 and 1/2 feet to 12 feet below the surface. The proposed improvements and the application of the development • standard revisions will be significant factors in encouraging development in the assessment district and other vacant por- tions of the Townlot area. As a worst case, it is expected that • the city's open space inventory will decrease by 24.5 acres, and that 857 residential units and 2 ,220 persons will be accom- modated in the assessment district at ultimate development. • This represents 140 units and 363 persons above the projected ultimate development without the project. • As the assessment district develops , there will be slight to moderate increases in utility and community service demand, traffic congestion on arterials , and acoustical, water, and- • air quality deterioration. • - 2- • The capabilities of the liquid waste system presently in- stalled may be exceeded by the cumulative effects of Hunting- ton Seacliff, Beachwalk, and the assessment district, all of which pass waste through the same lines. Also, any addi- tional growth in the area will contribute to the overloading of Orange County Sanitation Treatment Plant Number 2 , which is expected to reach capacity by 1977 . Storm drains to be • installed as part of the project will alleviate future run- off problems , but may result in overloading problems on the 22nd Street drainage line which also serves the area north • of the assessment district. Runoff in the 22nd Street drain- age line will also impact the beach at the point of outfall, and may have an adverse effect on the ocean' s water quality. • In light of potential power and fuel shortages, the small gen- erated increase in residential power consumption must be considered a significant adverse impact of the project. • There will be an adverse impact on the educational facilities of the Huntington Beach Elementary School District and the • Huntington Beach Union High School District as attendance ex- ceeds existing capacities. The Huntington Beach Fire Depart- ment has indicated that the proposed cul-de-sac pattern will • have a negative influence on their capability to respond to calls due to the necessity for following circuitous routes. Noise levels in the assessment district may fall into the HUD • category of Clearly Unacceptable during the construction phase • -3- • and, due to induced traffic, Normally Unacceptable along Goldenwest Street. Noise levels along Goldenwest Street will • necessitate the construction of at least a six-foot block wall. This action would decrease accessibility to .lots fronting Goldenwest and may require consideration of a "Planned • Development" designation of the general area bounded by Palm Avenue, Orange Avenue, 22nd Street, and Goldenwest Street. • The proposed improvements will be located within the Newport- Inglewood structural zone, and will be subject to a potentially significant adverse impact from earthquake ground shaking. The undergrounding of power utilities will improve the aesthetics of the area, but may be subject to more damage and costly re- pairs in a severe earthquake event. • Current building trends in the assessment district, due to high valuation, should stimulate significant revenues through both property and school taxes. The cost of improvements may be viewed • as a negative impact. Costs are expected to average about $8 ,660 per 50-foot lot. • • • • -4- • INTRODUCTION AUTHORIZATION The Townlot area of Huntington Beach has been the subject of a var- • iety of plans and studies . The assessment district project site is a small part of the Townlot area, and is defined by the boundaries of Palm and Orange Avenues, and� Seventeenth and Goldenwest Streets. • After several discussion sessions, the Huntington Beach City Council voted on August 20 , 1973, in favor of authorization for the Depart- ment of Public Works to begin the preliminary formation of the ass- essment district described herein, and to develop plans and specif- ications for that project. It was indicated at that time that an environmental impact report would be required. On February 4 , 1974, • the assessment district boundaries were officially established by City Council Resolution No. 3838. Formation of the assessment district has , as of the present, not been completed or finalized • by the City Council. AUTHOR • The Environmental Impact Report was prepared by John P. Miller and Charles L. Clark. Mr. Miller holds a Bachelor of Science degree in the field of Biology granted by the University of New Mexico, and • a Certificate in Environmental Studies granted by California State University at Long Beach. Mr. Clark holds a Bachelor of Arts degree and a Master of Arts degree in the field of Geography granted by • California State University at Long Beach. The authors wish to extend special appreciation to Jeremiah D. Jackson, former Environmental Engineer for the Huntington Beach • • -5- Harbors and Beaches Department, for his assistance in the areas of air, water, and noise quality evaluation. • PROJECT DESCRIPTION Location Assessment District 73-01 is a 58 acre area, located in the Townlot • area of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, California (Figures 1 and 2) . The project area is only a small portion of the larger Townlot area of Huntington Beach. The Townlot itself consists of • about 310 gross acres bounded by Pacific Coast Highway, Palm Ave- nue , Goldenwest and Sixth Streets. The assessment district is bounded by Goldenwest Street on the northwest, Palm Avenue on the northeast, Orange Avenue on the southwest, and Seventeenth Street on the southeast (Figure 3) . The entire district also lies within the coastal zone permit area as defined by the Coastal Zone Con- • servation Act(Figure 2) . The assessment district is a transition area between the beach/ • downtown areas and the newly developed recreation-oriented commun- ities of Huntington Seacliff and Beachwalk to the north. To the immediate west, and lying partially within the assessment district, ' • is the Huntington Beach oil production area. To the south, the assessment district is separated from the beach by an area of similar development, including commercial and industrial buildings • related to oil production. The increasingly developed older Town- lot area lies to the east. The common denominator of parcel ownership in the assessment dis- trict was originally the 25 foot by 117.5 foot lot; however, in • -6- 40 Fit • TE"Arpo ' PO - • S WE..LSD V _`.• - [ 0 r Q fly _ -. c,s' ••1L.P - �.? - .. H,Q O .M.� rtl.f � L �• O a,,,l •, 41 W _ .bl ED ----— .[rrv.• 101 r.O .000lrL'WOOD � 30 Y1 [i - it 2 _ _ h .... i'-. ti . "LA.,SAS 134 t 1 ..CAO. —To as,itr11N... 0 f.�4L 1 --- EArorw tr u c'L..[wtrr .-u T Oro ,A,�rrl OT[Yrl[Cn. ,::... L. rOLL•.DDDQ i 0 ■. cc r. _ O O - .. �IF --- ---� .f.♦ ,i.w•aC.•-. O 10•a•. .ICL4 •.'nICL.4..O R,T .o.ow. Los ra L[f � �crl,w• 10 4.rT•rO4.CA� • 4 ca • VSC 'Jcctltltrct L•_� 20 MI. ��.ac•4o 0— `.\� �•' .r�cu.000 CO.rt•- i-js s. lQ5 ANGE:EES. --CCUN?r \\�BF �1 p r OR4NGE .C .94 \\ [�• �— — 1 :CAL STATE COLLEGE I AT TUUEYic. 57EJ IL . `) ... 'J 17 .,..,1T..,[.4. •�. Y C Pr fuY t..T ••a•w. u lU TO.; V lo•v..Q S I Q nvo. 9� _ .: a0 �•,•ct.�u P..Tr�•or 91 9 t .[..DAL\Cr0 . '.�� L•.t.DDo I V 9S 1 Z rra.w[ u CAL STATE' Utru ,�. •• •... ..,,.AT �t•.yy�` IOMG _A=Nt ^ '....C•b.y as (,JJ unEi ng toA ~ - cr 22 \, 1110 IT SEAL ,ucw 0 ,_•' r \ WEST'•••• 55 C . Gj:; 'COLLEGE •,40 47 FIGURE / C.IRVINE 73 1 p VICINITY MAP rA SCALE MI MILES O(� _ \ . - j o HUNTINGTON BEACH L.ctl.A 41 . .......... ............................. • RDLSI .......... NEl ......... ................................. ................ ......... ................ .M.. ...... -------------- ........... .......................... ............ SLATER • ...................... ...............J ............................ ....... ............ TALBERT :.................I............. C.6.ci's i Zo" e P rmit Ar a Boundary GARFIELD H j tingt(M- 1. • S Cliff ................. ................ ................. VORKTOWN Bea hwalk Oil Prod i ADAMS Project Sit e ...... ......................... .... ........ INDIANAPOLM Townlot Area 4* ...................... ATLANTA HAMLION IKANNING PROJECT LOCATION MAP Figure 2 • huntington beach planning department • —8— numerous instances two or more of these parcels- have been combined under a single ownership. The most common parcel developed has 50 feet of frontage. In 1962 , a zone change was enacted which convert- ed the assessment district from a "light industrial" zoning designat- ion to R-2 and R-3. Since that time, 213 residential units have been constructed and are interspersed among oil production and re- lated facilities . Project Character The proposed assessment district is planned to eliminate piecemeal and costly installations of facilities as the area develops . In- stallation of the planned improvements will result in a cost- efficient one-time project. which accommodates ultimate residential growth of the area and mitigates many of the local .adverse impacts associated with such growth. The existing circulation pattern will be altered so as to alleviate existing traffic and parking problems . A final objective of the proposed improvements will be to develop the assessment district into a high quality environment which is uniaue in character _yet compatible with surrounding development. 41 Specifically, the im improvements p proposed for the district are: 1. All existing street improvements including curbs , pavement, sidewalks and oil pipelines located in the public right-of-way will be removed. Actual street replacement has become critical- ly necessary _due to years of deterioration through use and wea- ther. Both streets and curbs are severely dilapidated and approaching . unsafe conditions on some streets . Sidewalks are non-existent except where several early new developments have -9- • been constructed. Streets and alleys will be repaved, and side walks, gutters and curbs installed in accordance with tho City ': adopted standards and proposed plans for the area. • 2. A cul-de-sac circulation plan will be implemented (Figures 3 and 4) . It is anticipated that this plan will limit cross- district beach traffic. At present only stop signs are used to discourage this type of thru traffic. Pecan Avenue, Acacia Avenue, 18th Street, 19th Street, 21st Street and 22nd Street • will be closed to thru traffic. Primary circulation is to be provided via Acacia Avenue to 18th Street to Pecan Avenue to 22nd Street to Acacia Avenue, and via 20th Street. Existing • alleys will be expanded to 20 feet of right-of-way to provide one-way secondary circulation. Cul-de-sacs are generally pro- vided on 18th Street, 19th Street, 21st Street, and 22nd Street. • 3 . Parking courts will be provided in the above cul-de-sacs , at Acacia Avenue and 20th Street, at Pecan Avenue and Goldenwest • Street, and at Pecan Avenue and 17th Street (Figure 3) . Exist- ing development standards for the townlot R-2 and R-3 zone designations and lot configurations make it difficult to pro- vide the required on site parking and meet open space and vard requirements . The parking court concept will provide much of the parking area required by current standards. A typical • street section with associated curbs, gutters , and sidewalks is shown in Figure 5. Each of the ten cul-de-sac parking courts will provide 60 parking spaces . The remaining parking • courts will each provide 10-11 parking spaces with the exception of the court at 17th Street and Pecan Avenue which will provide 47 parking spaces. The cul-de-sac parking courts will be 65 • -10- 41LI j l i I I I I l i l l l ► __ = 'g ►--L--►- I--L-- �1-1-!-1---- T ! I I I T cc 1 1 I I I I II j I j I l j ¢ 0 r, . :i i 1 �. J 1; 1: I i I 0 iii I Ll LliLLI I I I .Li , C p � w J C - - -- - - _ - `CW - - - WX Q / A�he, sn a, p --�- i-._. L I � ® 11 P 111111117�---- 1111111111111ill III HIMMIR, IIII1illilli1iIIII-LLW1 WLIIIIiIIIIIIIIILLLI!.LLll. ul!11LI - ® �- � ITTT T T_ = Iii QJ AM vemuepo - I _ --- - - - - _ _ - -- AL Ah 1` Mr i _ �l o' goo' _ saw. PROPO/ED AffUfWT DVTRKT Town LOT AREA Primary Circulation Secondary Circulation Af IMPROVFMFNTS Figure 4 r Emergency Vehicles row CIRCULATION i i i I C I W II l i ! — � I !i I il- i i I _.._JI ' PROPOIED AIIEffMEnT DIITRICT TOUR LOT AREA landfcoping• street Section Figure 5 IEPTEffes fm • feet wide accommodating two 19 foot deep parking spaces and 27 feet of turning radius . All parking courts will be constructed within the existing public right-of-way. Marked parallel park • ing lanes will be provided along 18th, 20th, and 22nd Streets. Each of these areas will provide 17 spaces . • 4. Special paved areas, red stamped concrete with cobblestone pat- tern, at the end of each cul-de-sac and each parking court will be installed (Figures 3 and 5) . As part of the construction of • these areas , rolled curbs will be provided for those located at Acacia Avenue and 20th Street, and at Pecan Avenue and 18th Street in order to permit access to emergency vehicles. • 5. Landscaping will be provided in planters created at the inter- sections of parking courts and streets , in the adjacency of two parking courts and in the cul-de-sac excess land area. • Approximately 35 ,000 square feet of landscaping will be prov- ided by the assessment district improvements. In addition, 104 twentyinch box trees will be •provided at 50 foot intervals along the perimeter of the project; 180 fifteen inch box trees will be provided at 50 foot intervals on the interior streets of the • district; and a total of 10 twenty four inch box trees will be provided in the cul-de-sac centers . The landscaping also in- cludes all necessary irrigation and a variety of one, three, • and five gallon shrubs. General landscaping plans appear in Figure 3 and specific parking court landscaping in Figure 5. 6. Street lights at each intersection of two streets, of one street • and one alley, and at intervals of 150 feet along each street will be installed (Figure 6) . Street lights will not be placed • -14- ! III ;;;,; ii,. if I I` Ln WHH1 11HIMMI L $ r r -- -- • Street Lights PROPO/ED WEI MBIT DI/MKT mn LOT AREA 0 Street Signs -.Storm Drain Trunldine •��^'+/��/C11A C111TC Figure 6 Telephone&�T WA UTILITIES �Unde grou dii gectric along the alleys. Where a cul-de-sac exists, a single street light will be placed along the parking court center line on the sidewalk. Approximately 90 street lights will be installed. Street lights are currently non-existent except where early new development has occurred. The City's Advanced Planning Section has recommended that street lights be either on marble- lite poles to match the few existing street lights or, if avail- able, 1920 's style street lights be used to add distinctiveness • to the area. 7 . Street directional signs at each street intersection, and each cul-de-sac and street intersection will be installed(Figure 6) . • A total of 38 signs will be provided. The street signs will be architecturally compatible with street lights and other improvements. A special sign design, as yet undetermined, will delineate the assessment district streets to add character to the area. 8. A storm drain system, including a trunk line located in Orange Avenue running from 17th Street connecting to the existing trunk line in 22nd Street, will be installed (Figure 6) . Pipe diameter will range from 33 inches to 48 inches. The system is designed to accommodate a 25-year recurrence storm or approximately two inches of rainfall per hour. 9 . All overhead utility lines within the assessment district will be placed underground (Figure 6) . Included are the utility lines located along Palm Avenue, Pecan Avenue, Acacia Avenue, Orange • Avenue, 17th Street, Goldenwest Street and those located in all of the alleys. 41 • -16- Existing water main and sewer lines are considered adequate for ultimate population growth in the district and surrounding areas , and will. be discussed in detail under the public utilities section. According to the Huntington Beach Department of Public Works, the total cost .of improvements for the assessment district, including 15 percent assessment district incidental expenses, will be $2 , 040, 192. The city' s share of these costs will be $392 , 146 while the remainder is distributed among the district' s property owners. Since the approximate per parcel costs are dependent upon location for the improvements necessary, the costs to property owners will vary from $5 ,600 to $11, 000 per 50-foot parcel. The 41. average cost to each 50-foot parcel will be approximately $8 , 660. Avery tentative estimate from the city' s Department of Public Works indicated that all improvements would be .accomplished in one phase, beginning in May or June of 1975 and requiring a time span of approximately four months. 12 Specific Plan In addition to. off-site improvements , the Huntington Beach City Council and Planning Commission have .expressed concern about the lack of ground floor open space amenities and the massive appear- ance of structures in the presently developed portion of the assessment district. Consequently, the city' s Advanced Planning section has proposed several revised development standards which -17- will attempt to accomplish the following objectives : 1. Increased on-site ground level open space amenities . 2 . Reduction of the on-site area devoted to parking and approaches . 3. Improvement of building bulk and parcel size relationships. 4 . Increased incentive for assessment district participation of property owners . 5. Increased site plan flexibility for the developer and property owner. 6. Implementation of the goals and objectives of the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach41 • Together, the assessment district improvements and the development standard revisions constitute a specific plan of development for the Townlot assessment district. Proposed off-site improvements • have been described in the previous section as per the Townlot Specific Plan/Assessment District. The actual development stand- and revisions appear in Appendix A (Recommended Specific Plan Ordinance) of this report, and will be dealt with where appropri- ate in the Environmental Impact Evaluation. • • -18- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY Assessment District 73-01 is located within the south central por- tion of the Huntington Beach Mesa, which is elevated .25 feet to 50 feet above the surround.ing - floodplains of the Bols_a Gap to the northwest and the Santa Ana Gap to the east. The Huntington Beach Mesa consists of late Pleistocene alluvial deposits which are older .than the more recently formed sediments of the adjacent river gaps. .The mesa is generally characterized by unconsolidated. to partially consolidated interlayered fine- and coarse-grained sediments. Surface soils in the vicinity of the project area are fine sandy loams. Topographic relief within the assessment district is subtle, ranging from 40 feet above sea level in the north to 30 feet in the south (Figure 7) . The slope of the district is typically less than five percent.24 • The project area lies within the geological area- known as the Newport-Inglewood structural zone . The South Branch Fault, one of the three faults having the highest seismic risk potential within the City, .traverses the northeast portion of the assessment district along Palm Avenue (Figure 8) . A minor trace, the Walnut Street Fault, extends northwest-southeast approximately one-fourth mile southwest of the assessment district. Presently available empirical relationships indicate that maximum base rock accelerations could range from about .10g to . 65g; the maximum ground accelerations could range from about .18g to l..Og. An earthquake equal in magnitude to the 1933 earthquake (6. 3) could be expected to produce a peak ground acceleration within -19- OVER 100 FEET-- I W75-100FT. ® 50—75 FT. !� I: �•a' �. .-\ '� �:::.;`< ':,{?" 3P ,i4 C.] 25—50 FT. I 25 FT .P :•r«:.:; 1 dP e 5 O �:•:r>?4 a 0-5 F T ;:`..rye^s:•; ;:ii :....... \%:r::�i:i�::::. a 1 ........ .... .......... ............. ........ ..-. .......... ......... ......:...:. i<=, BELOW OFT. f r::x 0 5 }4 .T T R 4 P` 0 ,¢ •�'F':i:•::i�ir�rii`:ii�:L•:': l}' F3i= �I ME - t J ::•b • / r Y' .�i \.•`• c$t t a' r ,S•. 4' I, to GC:' 1 !F P ••7 '4t F I'' { 11 .v. tititi� i i i !1 I r.2 >,� I. °Eea;•: 4y \ {: ti:v.; y�•ti?:•::•::•.�: U�ul{` I: {t{4�i({�IIs lil 1�, lljl � �r`�•. :V :L:Y::':::r:j•:.;i z.,• �1 �! I! {III��II r•: ��ti;:''��k ;� ` :`iS�:•::��:J•:`•i:>i:::5`.�,Si 1 � 1 I'�y{1111 � �(�''� f� • {:}•: •a:iwr:,:�.-..:a1:iiiV lil 11 .... 4. It � `;z«;>� � lift lil{1 �fi I'1 I`( 11'• 1, 1, � t: � `` {I '; I, I hill lI l "X}•:r , �`'��>{ 1 ':t.:;.�`f. Il'�{I�ii�I{i' 11{yt'!{I��iif � i ,,f",L! P�i�� \r. .�' },}, 'l l• {I1� ( 1 ,�I� i �:f�s�} .'\ t 1�,� i ♦Y 's` - 1 Ilt 41`i a�, 1� � �I :_ II11 1�11 1 I'I'1{II ' -{ ::�i t 'I��i!Zs� ' 11�i_=:1:-� :+�.f.� ling: i��: •,o-r\_ r L" �� 1 I 1 �1 1 i I _1 III -1 ;' 'r :/� I �� li 1.�� vt ,. •_) 'rt- �•}II li I��t I ,Ili I�i�lil I 1 I{� III .I Y illl I' � r� I1.. �`h�('{1 I� rz• '� `e:.:•rt �� r' t'']i,�• '•�+ ttk� � •f�"�1<t / � - ' 1��Iji{I,IIll�ill 11��i!f I1 I,III �:y�ili If��1 r/,f�� ii: Sl E,I .r 3 `;It�l „r I€�,. _ � �11�{lil a(I��I! I I 1 I`! 111-i, I{)!Illi�I•'1` 4 1 1 �,ih (t� .t` .. ♦f7 � I Illl I •! 1"II{ �!�i �{I(1{: •� ��:{ill{ 1;I II I I '�•`'�.� �{ !1'I L,� ' , ,rF=°`. _ iyr I'I!�II: !�{!111 `1 1.1 it i �{ I .. .. nil111�1�1{� {li{Ii 1 _. {l�ll C 1�1� •.Illf, � Ill .�.��.� :•ti' �� 1 I ' •�� '1 _ �� '�..�!� I'I!:�i.ltllillll(I�I{{:{{��I f��tl{{l��e ,. ,- r 'r:' .� `• •� - iriCe'r �:.;�t.:w% i::'i,::v:: � - - `- - -- —- _ fi111S1•.:11 'l�'i(��1�{14��t�ll({�� `.� ` _ �^._,,, _.,.. . SCMNCS KS.KAKTWC+9-1"17 -- Assessment District Figure 7 AIMN 3 HUNTINGTON BFi4C.H C41FORMA TOPOGRAPHY:RELIEF 6Y ELEVATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT p HIGHEST SEISIVIC RISK (GREATEST SURFACE RUPTURE: POTENTIAL WITHIN CRY ®AREA OF tNTENSIVE SHEAR BURIED-TRACE OF FAULT ' - (WITHIN 400'ZONE) ©UNCERTAINTY AS TO EXISTENCI OR EXTENSION OF FAULT i N ��~"• _ z i+'dam-- - �� -- --+- _ SOUTH FAULT I - ------ ------- -CO.s! OLIVES FAUN=!.1------- �Z -- fOI�E.IDGMfOM•TBI i♦fSOC.0-1-17 HUTNTINGTON %EACH CALIFORNIA Assessment District Figure $ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ®® FAULT MAP the range of . 15g to . 35g, which represents a lower acceleration than for adjacent floodplains (typical range : 27g to .70g) ?4 Thus , potential seismic activity will represent an unavoidable adverse impact on the proposed improvements in the district and a hazard to residents as the area develops . Depending on the activity of these .faults, the assessment district could be subject to a moder- ate earth shaking hazard; however, only nominal risk of earth rupture is predicted by the 1974 Geotechnical Study prepared for Huntington Beach by Leighton-Yen Associates (Figure 9) . Land subsidence , the slow vertical sinking of the earth 's surface , represents a potential significant hazard to the assessment district. It is due partly to removal of oil resources. Values of up to 5 .1 feet of subsidence between 1928 and 1965 have been reported in the region of the assessment district. However, future problems aris- ing from land subsidence due to oil field operations will be mini- mized if the current level of water injection into the oil wells of 300 ,000 to 400 ,000 barrels per day is maintained. The oxidation of peat soil layers and liquefaction can be related to subsidence . However, there exists no peat soil deposits in the assessment dis- trict, and danger from liquefaction has been considered not sig- nificant.24 -22- To-: 'THE CITY OF hUNTIHG`1'UN rE�4H 1 API UPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED TOVINLOT ASSE,551*1 NT DISTiUC'1" Signed Date signed I own / d O Ft. in the TOWNLOT DI RICT. PHOidE fit. Sant[rolA�am _ _ Patriot. , � m Us1'ostag680 � t G " --'To THE CITY OF HUNTINUTON BEACH L A14 OPPU,;ED TO THE PRUPOSED " TOVVdQOT ASSESS•LiIT DISTRICT" W. Signed Date signed I ov.-G `� 1Tt in the TVIYlt11Vt ASSESSi� +'T Dlal'RIC2:. E t uS.Pwtage80 I 11ia. &cAaia'Q, Wann 125 - 16,!A Si. flunun�fon Beac , La Li�onrtta ?2ut�8 I To: THE CITY OF n'UNTINGTON bEkCH I AM UPPOS.LD TO IIIAL PzOPOSLD it TO�vjLLOT ASSESSI;NT D16TRICT" SignecL42-1 Date signed I own 'Z� Ft. in the TOWNLOT. A56z-,,SSi�Lz;LqT D16TRICT. P1101u; SammlAdams s, Patriot i i pl U.S.Postage�¢ i m, ,rr r. /l,�.c.`aana'B3 Warn 125 - T 6.fk S-1.�a Lp j # lat,i aton Bea onn to 7260 � i i To.:. THE CITY OF hUNTINGTON BENCH I AM OPPOSED TO TAL PROPOSE.; " `1'(;*ll'iLOT ASSESS;"ih;V`1' DISTRICT" 00, Urban Reco gtio on Sided Steven L. Butcher, A'.V.P. Date signed xa d " -120 -1975 I ovm 200 **. Ft. in the TOwNLOT ASS :;Sl; itil' Di:;TRICT. rIi0,,gE fc (213) 670-0150 1 SamuelAdams Patriot i us.PastageSO I Lt. luchaAa 8. Wann Run,. ton Beach, �a Li�o area ?2648 'f To; THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON !LLCH I All OPPO;; D 'i:U THE PiiOPO,`ILD " TOV'.NLOT Si�iied ✓�-.t., ;date signed I own ✓0 Ft. in the TOWNLOT. ASSESS i_6iiT J.RSTRICT. PILOHL 5 6- of 0 9 i SamuelAdams ,.,- Patriot 2JS.Postage Vo 1 PkicAaldB.=Wa.. r 72 - 16 /C ��una..tit�c+%t'Beact�, i i T . CITY OF riUNi'INGTON BEACIi I AR OPPOSED TO T" PROPOSED " TUY NLOT ASSESSPi1�lY'1' DISTitICT" Signed- Date signed = (Z 1ST I owa 0 -Ft. in the TOWNLOT ASSL6&.I.i T D16T lICT. PHONE tF a-t-e . ` /•Z 68 {SE6 - o pm- Is M k y uSPostageC� i� I I.' i, t I I 1 li :r> 125 R 16th S�,p ann - Puninaton �� fI I To:. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L AM .OPPU6ED TO THE PROPOSED " TO°;ri•1LOT ASSEaS iT DlI'jTIUCT'l jr Sined D� ' b Date i n _. ;f_Y— 2= i �iisa�'a V 1 V m/-NI.I r ivn ZIl Laic .vtrtwvy �►SSES.�i�;t�'1' i) 5'I'{IC'I: PHo�a ;; 76 7,73 1 gamuetAdaTw Patriot . . � usrostage�� I� Mtn. /�"CA JtQ�. Wann {{un,ian�ar��eac�, CaLige v is ?260 i 4 Toe. THE C1TY OF IiiTi'v'TIi�Ti�TOiy BEACH I: tii9 OfpUSLD 'TO THE* 'HE ONO,SEO 11 TOV NLOT A.�.'Sr;SSi•i�dT' I'�'' . r A�si.dned _.__ � - _ Date s.i;ne T o— LJ "� 4.1,0 m rl..::i.'l nm V4Ci AVi1tiL Vl PHOPIL;f �� IS S qj- I 1 7 q MR D J GARSON 1706` RALSTON I AVE BELMONT CA 94002 0' -) c Samual s -_- * I , A,.,. &cAa4a B. wm.m !2 5 - 16oh st.#q l Rein qe on Beach, Ca Li�- &ia 926g8 I � I f i 4 To:. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I -act CPPU;3ED TO THE PRUPOSED " TOY+IgLOT Signed Date. signed /2 I. o•,:�. �O 1 t.. in the T0IV LW.L El,`i.5 ;S,Si°lla.l iJ.l 1 R I `I -;2 aAI,�) s�. FHOIdE{f �/3 �i¢J SamaBlAdam3 - Patriot 1 14 YT.SPostage� i flip. 2 cftand B. Wann 125 - 16, (ali ovua 92648 i ii To:_ THL CITY OF HUNTINUTUir BLACH L AD ,C•M,611D i'O THE PIWPOSED " TU'ld4LOT ASSLSSi;;,;iiT I:IaT :ICT" J _5/Z l /� 7S-jute signed y 0i,= j.•1ilal 6"C y Vial LVl iiIS`1'RICT: PHUIIL f �� '7 SamuelMlm Patriot iJS.Pbstage�¢ i i y 1lin. 2icl:and B. W«n e i lzc _ IRA S'.A fi'uru..in�,nfar. Beach, j aLzlo_a ?2548 I �J To:_ THE CiTY OF HUNTINUTON 3ZACli I• Ail JPPUa;LD TO THE PROP SED " TOViliLOT ASSr;SS �`1' DIS'l`itICT" va Signed G�- Dat wiUned�� a 177 J. O::n- 's 10 i L.- in Ii.liE `i U r'irLCT ASSE&il rlii DISTRIGT1, T PHO.�Ltf J r A OS -- '95 C* � �� NA — P�oFbS1�0cC7y CI+ V e s uelA&i= = Patriot i a. ~ TIS.Posta js a IF5»A. Ri chard B.�ann12� - 16th �.t. .Af;t.�inyf_rrrz Bea `l aGidAmn a 926y8 i f �t To.:. THi CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1 AM Ur.E 0 6L D TO THE PROPOSED " ` O:'I'SLOT ASSLSS:il",NT DIST.LdCTrr Date signed ' C� I orris _ _Ft. in the TO:iRLOT A;a:;r,aSl:tivT DiST ?ICT. p PHONE s l it v To.:. THE CITY Gr HUNTINGTUN BFJWH I AM UPA),`:lD TO THE PROPOSED " `l'UWkILOT low Sued Date sinned :S I. oven �� -Ft. in the TOwNLOT ASSL661,iLiti l' �i;alttlCT. / PUWE ff �� ~7✓` l 6 �Q SamuelAdams __ Patriot uS rosta$e 80 Aa. RicAand B. Wann 125 - 76,i i—qq {dun Zn�tort beach, Catjgovua 926g8 I b:` `1Nr.'=Y OF 11 TINGTUA Br.AC"Ii I Ail! TO THE; PROposL ) '1'Ov iYi,OT ASSi:SSi1`i` i)ISTi:ICT" ` . Sued_ �•. _ , Date signed rlvwc_;L-�� i own � Ft. , in the TOviNLOT AwSSLrJ:aI•i�. 2' Di °�iTCT. i iioia # S3 6 7JS D �cow, P�&%m'2arcs _ io US.Pastage8¢ aid B. Gflann PA. �cti Beach.�r. a26�8 To: THE CITY OF iMiTINGTOIL .61�r'Cli I A14 C-P.POSLD T(� ThE P ,OP WSjE;l) 11 TOVVii T CT t ;� Signed /o Date signed I own Ft. 4 the T ow ii L u-2. PRONE SamuelAdams == Patriot ' m3 j U.&Pcstage s¢ i Jl,�, =cSzana'8. !Vann r'S.fh 8eS;f.5 r �txl jvn z 9264 t 14 I, I 'I I 1 To;. THE CITY OF HUNTINUTOiv LEi�CH I, All OPPOSED TO THE rROrOSlD " `I'O;ii4LOT D10TRICT" Signed L_ i Dat e signedo .- 1L LVIIJ'1y1 V1. j' f W 2. litchatda. Wann j� 125 16iA {{ }dunt a� on den/ch, G LC�O:ULLG Q2Gy8 _ To:- THE C.-TY CF .HUNTI ii;TON BEJ$.C'I I: All ©APO-6ED TO THE PROPOSED " TO°riNLOl , Date signed _ 1 v..- 1u vL- J.�II-Jr VJ. ASS�.S��ttT::'L' DTS1'r:iC2: Plio Ia,#Sc� P M c -SamnelLA-dams _ = atriflt U.Sjwtl e8o c � I C � 12 - Y 6 le j#.�ttrr t1 5 on Beach. a,Z.r.�o�va i.a ?26 3 To: THE CITY OF :Ui'STINIGTON bLACH-- I. la-1 bNt'OSy!) To `''llE t' :OPOSLD f" `r04111LOT 9 D- e sig ned J I c:in � Ft. in the WUNLOT PHONE n i 1 us.Fostage��- (II ' ( 1 ' 4 A,%. /Ucha tW B. Wann 125 - "doh D-9t/ Run..,ingian Beat r Cati j6u is 926y8 To: THE CITY OF HUATINGTOIL tsEtiCH I AU OPPOSLD TO ThE PEOPOSED " TOW"OT AS,SLSSIr !VT lll:.TRICT" Signed :,,Date signed I own � Ft. in the TOWNLOT. ASSESSiiri�`1' iJIoTRI"T. PHONE ;# � —�0✓`r sal[ielAdalus = Patriot 8 f I AA. /Zzc4a4a B. Uiann 125 - 16fA S1..a Httu yton BeacA, CatiyAri o 41648 To;_ -HE CITY OF HURTINuTON LD;C.i I All OPPj;!!D TO THE PRO Smell. It TOvoiiLOT D1NTRICT�� Date signed L Yell 1 VYY�L'V1 ASS�S�I•'i:.'1' li1S`l'�ICl: 1Y�/ J. h ` st�m�il-t1Slams _ Pc1tTlOt / 7`� g + r us.Posta"ge�� + ;2. A:cAqtdB. wan .. 125 - 16fA S"t.AtJ ` Iurzun csrz-Ban Lal"4lt a ?2648 i t I .. j To_: THE CITY OF HURTINGTOA BEACH I. AR OPi-`OSED TO THE PROPOSED i'OWNLOT ASSESSiHE N`_' DISTIUCT" I Signed _ Date signed I own .a O ' _Ft. in the TOWNLOT AS5.;.6SMrriT DlaTRICT. PHONE riY 5 � � 3 3 -7,.9 i - 4 To,: THL CITY. Or; hUidTIhGTC)A-!3r4lCii t l [�) _ T. AM ().P 04S TO T.`E L'riGPOSL"sa 'TOW.RLUT j Date siGned 5/ ; J y I. o u Ft. in the TUViRLOT ' ASS�,;.�5!•i�i`1' D1A�1i�ICT. � _ rHOtdl: t� l SamuelAdams Patriot Warm 1; i S ` Cat)dA zn_ 92648 I i a 1 To:. THE CITY OF HU14TIEUTON BEACH I. All OPPOSED TO `i'HE .PROPOS- ' TOU�aY ASSySS•iz;�+T DISTRICT" - Signed I Dat aigned I oval ._ in the TUyv1dLOT r"iSSr,SScii.ir DlaiilCi. Pii0IdE7 T . / THE CITY OF i UB'TINGTON BEkCH r� I All OPPOSED TU `1'hE P.iOPOSED " U.`W4.�ilOT AS6ES NiLNT ll10, 111RICT" Signec�� ,� � Date 8igned_/ - 3"� I own TO_Ft. in`_ihe T0VjNLOT ,,.,%(r L16TRIr7T. PHONE j SamuRlAdams Patriot uSPostage89 j - I A,%. &cka td B. Gann 125 - MA S,4.#4 Run ung,.on Beao;; Catigonn a 926g8 1 THE CITY Or HUIdTtNGTUid I AM Ur1'06ED To THL PRUPOSED " `1'U'rJIYlUT , ASSEb:kiLIVT DISTtdC`t"t ,,.. Signed. ► r; Date sitSned � i I Own _ U _Pt. an the TU�JiyLOT A66iJaSI,,rui7.' i)la'2itICT. / � � _b•�� . (� _ - - - [ ~ � ^ k ' . . . - - ( � , ' ,pvw t *a To.,.. THE CITY OY hUNTINGTOA BEi,,CH. I. AM OPP66 TO T" PROPOSED " TUVJIULOT ASSESSMEii`T' Dlf(-Tit!CT" - Date siGned own I U 0 Ft. in the TCv;NT,OT PROLIE F-- Mr: & Mrs. Verne E. Strapg;� 1 267B Avenida Sevilla �"` �4 fi U/C„ Laguna Hills, CA 92653 * ` - ' MAR c _ 6 _ u125 S.Postage(�� /�l/L. %1�LCl3aij.�U. SljaJttt � V ��•u:nan Beach, Cccti�A z;,a 426g8 i To_: THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I AM OPP06ED TO THE PROPOSED. " TOi hLOT ASSESS,U-A'4T 1)I,3Ti�ICT" Signecl�'�r"""' Date signed r �S I ovm S'O- Ft. in the TOWELOT ASSk:aSt•:Lk.T D16TRICT. PHONE # S3 6 - i SamraelAdams Patriot r_= � U.S.Pwtage 8� l J I Ail. Pic4and B. Wann � Nuna.a.n�ion Q,.", {a Ligo e u a n2G{8 I � r ■ To:. THE CITY OF. HliNTINUTOR BEACH 6. L All OAPULED .TO THE PROPOSED TOwRLOT 4SSESSi-LINT D16TRICT" Signed 5�&OL C!'Y z, Date signed)//7aA/, l Y-/ 1 r:.. i:a C. y :rri�Lvs. ASSES,Si•lt:�v'1` :�15`I'iZIC'l: -3 PHo iE;f S - 71S - r I IZS.Past�,;eC�� I I It ) Ala. RiCA a,�. Wann i 125 - i6fh. S..#q lfun. i.nqton Beach, I f C«Ligo.ti .- 926q8 I ° To:_ THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I, A14 .OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED TO°'Vii4LOT ASSESS z;iT DISTRICT" y�Q Sign Date signed<.� . otrn- T,'t.._ in the TOVIULOT ASSL,5.5ru:i�'L DISTRIC2: PHOiJyf samuelAdams patriot I' uSFastage8o i j U12 125 - 16A � .,,t{ E1 punAingion BeQch 1� iQ gOlLn.Ll2 9260 I � 4l I > L To:. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L -All .OAPOuED TO THE PROPOSED TOVINLOT ASSESS Izi 4T DISTRICT" Signed Date signed — ✓� I om m Z S Ft..- in the TO►INLOT ASSESShEliT DISTRIC2: PHONE# -7 �� Mr. & Mrs Steven 1 Griger �� %'v , 419A - 19trh S,rcet Ftv� ' Huntington Beach, Ccil,f. 92648 SamuelAdatns Patriot 4 A 7 r7 /9 7 'Us. tage AA /3.t cha jd B 1b'ann 1 125 - lbzn St #� .Hun-tnc#on Beach Catcgan un '72KO r � Y To: THE CITY OF HURTINGTON. iiEACH I All OPPOSED TO TiiE PROPOSED " TOi7"OT ASSESSNir;NT DTS1`RICT�,,/' ~ Signed. Date signed ? I own SO Ft. in the TOWNLOT. A SSESSiiz;k4 T DIST- T. PRONE Via N 9n `�37 oti �s.�ostage� nr 4 39 yWyann 125 - 76A S�.#1 Run,-tngd.ton i3eac% Cati�Atia Wqd To; THE CI�.`Y OF HUNTINGTON. 3EkCH I All 011PO:;hDl TO ThE 1ItUPOSLD " TOWNLOT ASSESSILh;NT D161RICT" Signed L Date si.-nc - 4t/ld _�5 I own 56) ,Tt.._ .in. the TOWNLOT .�-�� PI�oNE r 6, 73 —<Fc5�S MRS. ROY B. WOOLSEY 113 Via Vc-nozia SamuelAdams --= _ Patriot Newport Beach, .California pp - .. u3:PostaaeO� , s' , �fU�s.urs�xa'on Beac , . b # S T►s" ' THE v JNTINGTONi. bEk Cli *;: Signed p.,lh t Date a.gned Mar 12-1975 I own 50 Ft. in the TOWNLOT. AS.Ss:S5,e4 1 STRIC`1'. PRONE At- 536-2839 FII Mildred M Clement 606 l 8t h S t ,,O N gf, � SamuelAdams. f Huntington Bch CC , 92648 U..S.Pwtage : 4 1 t M r9i:c, Rx:cicandB. Wawa �dinn..a're�,fon:Beci�, t �a Zi.�onnza-925r�8 1 r, _d 9a. THE CITY,-OF AUNT-INGTOR BEACH I AM OP-OW ED TO THE PROPOSED. ASSESSii,NT DI;aTRICT" Date rAgneallat-:2 I cv-•rn 5'Oyi20'C*RbTFt. in the TOWNLOT s :`e !•.`said�1d' i1 ' ° _ `_Patriot . i AA. Rich d A. Wann 725 - l6tn St..P? Hun-ihqton Beach, I To:. THE CITY OF HUNTINUTON BEh.-d LAM GPPUL;ED TO THE PROPOSED " MviNLOT ASSES,Si-1 ;iiT I)Iu7.` :ICT't Slglied�ZW Date signed — / --1—7� — It, in the TU;ICLOT ASSL;,S.Silt;ii' AJ1S'I' ZIC`l: PHONEW 0��l ff �S.Postag��¢ t 2s - �. �lun.�.en�.fon Bea (atillArL a 926g8 To.:. THE, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L AM UP110 SED TO THE PROPOSED " `L'UWKLOT .. ASSESSr"-UT DISTidCT" Date signed,`��j� - — �`1 own s—C-) Ft. in the TUWhILOT ASSi:SS!•ir;NT D16TRICT. PHcii-E .�ON L=F. .�81ffi7 7 2LYH19 N y � y�c�tBASS�:�. 125 - r 6th St. Hum-ingtcr.Beal., . Cati�.mi. Q2648 To:. THE CITY OF HUNTINUTUN BEACH L -629 OPPOSID TO THE PROPOSED `'t `TOvd4LOT n SSESSI.L:iT. DlwTiRICT tlI Si.bne Date. signed / T own '60 A94 �.. 1.i �al'i c^ J.Oi l'iL VT ASS;�;SSt�s:�v'1 li 1 STt2l C'l PHOI�TLrtZia- � ®rid ,-I,�c =a uS.Poatage8o � � To: THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON. bEE.CH I All OPPOSLD U TriL P iWOSEN " TOWRLOT ASSES&L NT Dl;DTRICTl' j^) Signed Date signed 1�l,7S I oven /00 Ft. in the TOWNLOT. ASar;SS;�iv'I' J:i.�wkICT.. v�—Orfi� �T PHONE r� SamuelAdams .,� =__ Patriot a $f N4 r<S - 16,/A SCM i Rvn unaxorz BeacA, ,otilonnia 9261q To: THE CITY OF .-iUTli1GTOi - .6EACH I. Ai-i OP:P05LD TU Tti j' P iOPOSED " TOWALOT AS6LS-S1iiEiiT DIbTRICTI' Signed Date signed01, 3 / � I oern - Ft. in the TOWNLCa ASaESS;:r:i'+T DI��TiZI :T, -�� PR-011M it SaMEk.AdaMS - uSPostage8o IA. Rio4andB. 06nn 12S - 16tI, S, #0 r'Ju it on Be ch, Ca�i�r`o�ua 926¢$ 1 I To: THE CI1'Y OF HUNTINGTON. i3EACH I All UPFCSLD TO TiiE P.L UPU:;ED " T0V514LOT ASar:,S:rr;iiT lllN 'RICT" �� Signed Date signed ,3--1 I. oven U Ft. in the TOVUNLOT. -36 PHONE r dl r SamuelAdams :___ _ - Patriot f usrostage80 I s 125 - 16V j�.ip4i v fi. ..n,.ngton BeocA. I t Ca La n a 92648 To:. a THE -G ITY OF iiulll Il`i Olel SilcH' : K.• I: AM CePOz;;;D TO `i'HE PRO" ZED " TOv:iiLOT ASSSESSii2�JT D11 TIUCT" Date signed i • 1' • 1u �,VIlL1IV1 <ASSESSiit�l'1 DSTitIC2: Samuel Ac� a A, Y: ika uSPostage80 AA. Rccna za B. Wann 7qanc,AOon BeacA. C.&Jo,u, 92648 * 1 i To; THE CITY OF-HUNTIA-TON !3E CH I All OPPOSED T0-'.TliE PROPOSED " TOgWLOT ASSESSIvi ;NT DIa`i'R :CT" Signed Date signed Z I. own �� Ft. in—the T0WNLOT. _ ASSI;SSi T DISTRICT. PHONE # + +n. 2G APR ��--- 4 uS.Postageso , i I AidhaadB. Wann 125 - 161A R.11 Bun ratan Beal CaZzga,LrAa 926g8 ' I To:. TEL CITY OF HUii`I'I iGTuJ BEACH 1. A"A CPPCuED TO THE PROPOSED " '1'olkiLOT ASSE6&- ,N' DISTidCT' a Lffl Si�ne3o Date ..' gneci Ft. in the TCi AiLOT PHoijL 3 l3 / O r. John'A. Ga lkin 1untiHuntino10untington Ave. MnBch., -- -- - I CA 92646 i -n:31/ S1. i - uSPost 80 e 1 I W1A. R lagd B. Wann 25 16,tA R.rlq." 1 un,un�,tort Beach, &Ci jonn,Za ?2648 i To: THE CITY OF HU11i;TING'.OR I All OPPO6.L;D TO Tf PqOP(-)SLJ) TOiVkiql--0.T Ak;6EESMI liT Di.,L)IRICTII Signed jr Date zitgne I ovill L,S0- Ft. in the TOWILOT PROINE 7-f C--�, 5amuelAdas Patriot � . w � yusrostage�� f11n, h:�cra`�, Wann 12, 1i la Sill !un xr; h Be,, a; Ca.L.iv�3.a �"2Fi�cY . To:. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON bEilCH I< .l`D oPPU;. ED TO THE PRUPOSED " TU;;NLOT 9.SSESS��::��I' JISI'i�IG" Signed Date_ signed 1� Z 01, in the Mf,107:A. :y� ASa`..;.ubriuitl � S:1'tzIC2:. ___,_•__._._. � ___•._..._,--..-._ damn�".�""'+-.a-._�;`""''�a. �y Samu£}A[Ic`4W5 us.Nostage8f Erin. i�.tcltanrf c5°. �a+� f{�n<.cr.�"�an beach, i II � To: THE CITY OF HUBTINGTODL JbEACli I AN OPPOSLD Ti ) `' i ; Pi:OPOSED " IO UILOT AS;aES&ikM DlA'DTRICT" Signed Date signed 3 - 1y-1 -5 I. oven j;O Ft. in the T0WiLOT. ASSI;SSi•.-L&4T DISTRICT.- �$ �?� c3�V( �17 PRONE Z(Z- 593 tZa2 a P PJt a i i p1 z. '4- Si, rr aas 5 - RunA ny-on Beach. v _ tali on�zia 926y8 • i To: THE CITY OF iiuiTlNGTON- iil!;A.ctl I AM OPFOSLD TO " 11 - PO "O':l•'RL0 S� Date fined I own �� Ft. a1: tre ToViNf-OT. ASSLSSi�x:ct�` �)Ia'I'PI(:T4 P11011L. IV SamuelAdams patriot _= U.S.? I i r . RA fiaid A. Wann q 5 y � rlr�na,isi&tdn Bpacfe, � �a Li�ahrxa 9zbr�8 I To:- THE CITY OF HUNTINUTON BEACH I- AM OPP06 LD O hE P-RU!OSED " TOVI:NLOT ASSESS; T DISTRICT" Sl8ne Date signed /7,f Iv ru +t. rnf �- Cl'. s i l,- . in vaae TwovA .O A.SSESSi•ik i`t' DISTIRIC`I ;. a SamuelAdams _ Patriot vMM �f i US *age8.Pos � I i+l.a. Ri1 RAn$�i. rz$ t" ;�;una.in�.£nec12 �a I b !I To: THE CITY OF :7URTINGTON- B ACH I AM OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED " TOWNLOT ASSESSM :ilT D16-TRICT" Signed �.r,(o Date signed I own c;2,S 'Ft. in the TOWNLOT. ASSBSSiir;!iT DISTRICT« PRONE #��a/�/ SamuelAdains patriot .. B;Sl�stage8V AA. RicAea4d B, Wann 125 - i6tA Sd.#1 Hunati on Beach (a Ugot a 926g8 r G NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS IiE•'REBY GIVEN , that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that the City Council of .. the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75, did adopt 'a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT. DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary' Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that Monday, the 19th day of May, - 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour -and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest_ Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in , or owning , property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the. undertaking of said proceedings . without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests. or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911 , " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of_ the State of California and. bonds will also be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars . The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these. proceedings : A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights , drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN. AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities " and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 517 , 518, 519 , 520, 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto showing the general nature , location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: .3O APPROVED o1$ T4 FQMz Db�r Ff. CNFa CLERK 'OF THE CITY OF dt+sy A;tort,©y HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By! Ueptity City Attorney \7 A ` Tf7 TTTTT22n — O` d ® 11_ll.lwl-.l!l.11._1111_'!1.1.L11L'1' r;> I I I I l i l l j I II I I . �► I I I ;�' �I I i � � I t i t _ 1_... t 11T f f ITiT1Tl?�I�l ITITi"f �i 11�T� I �i� � � � I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 ® 1!!IIIIIIII I lilli�llllill lillllllllll - 11li1�11.1J�.1L111 'I l i I I I I I I l l t rn - - - m 20th z fF Tr r- - --- -T-�- 191h � I I I I I I I I ! III j it F_T__F j I I ji I i l.1 — l I I I I I I I �— m 1TITRT17711 rrrFTmm -, - -- - l. 18th Sri t9 _T__ l --- - • Office of the City Clerk LimCity of Huntington Beach MAY 2'75 P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 0 I 23-152-01 CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH HUNTI NGTON BEACH, CA. �2648 I I� - I f I l� NOTICE OF HEARING \` CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN , that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of .. the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour -and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in , or owning , property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All pretests or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of. the State of California and. bonds will _11so be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference i5 htz.reby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars . The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be. constructed under these. proceedings : Office of tf1@ City Clark (MAY J' City of Huntington Beach g P.O. Box 190 CAUFORNIA 92648 23-151--0.5 CITY .OF HUNTINGTON BEACH` j HUNT 1 NGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 I r , A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks , driveway approaches , paving , street lights , drainage structures , ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. - ACACIA AVENUE - from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to' Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518, _519 , . 520 , 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto .showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: ,3O APPROVED Al$ T4 g0M: ' Jah V. i(69PA CLERK � HCITY OF dIAV At,torri©y HUNT.INGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deputy City Attorney 1 goldenweit ( 1 Nodr------�--�- . I III i - - L- - - L -i -..1- l_ A .. 1TT1111 0' ® W1.l.a;.l!11!'.L111.11 J11L'.11 ai- - __ _� I I l i i l �--►-. l i i I I II I I ��rn 21A ® a 0 Ai LiL'.LLaLI.111ll_� I I I I I I I I 1 I I I IJLL I 1111 1 1 111 1 (I I i I 111;I I I I i I I I I I I ED i jT--7 m 20th L I i l _.I. . L.. .L.-_fir ,11 EllI I 19th 4 0 0 11.1LIL111L'11a " Lll11L.1_ "'tl_�" II I' (� IIII 1.111�11J "11 '♦ �71 I � I I I ► I i I ! � LI l i i ! I II IT - rnml n1l m-n-n-rrrRrmrr 18th 4) 0 LL- —0---I = I I i 1 1 1 I I i ilil I I I I fT Ct III ► ' ILI J, uth r NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 ('1OVNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE .IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of . the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right . of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street., Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in , or owning, property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests. or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of. the State of California and. bonds will '11so be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on fil-e in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars. The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these proceedings : ® Office of the City Clerk c.orr J' City of Huntington Beach MAY 2 '75 P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 RE,U �� l O ,v�Rq S��©FR ' B ' N�9e gpbR 23-115-11 TUIVSTNILL, .JAMES W. ET AL 8160 DART •OOR DR8VE ' HUNTONGTON BEACH, CA. 92646 i r Y A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters , sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights , drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST , easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE .from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520, 521. , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621, and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on .the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is hereby made to the map attached hereto showing. the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: ,3D APPR0VKTi D15 TO MMz DbP V. rWrf,'Q CLERK � H OF di%V HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA DApUty City Attorney MLI fill,�711 11 o I itII - -I II�IaTi1 .1_Yi.rii — —AM -- _ 1L111_WJ111ll.1111L11 l j i l i _ cc � i. I I I ► jl I I I I I �- . M-771TTTTTi1 III d;i , F 777 7,17 77 - ,`r;T7T it?(', m !► 4161 j I I II I I I Ia z J-1 -I ILI iT liT(TI TmT!iTYii 1 TT 1� 1�IL 111 III I i I I P — 1— L J ITT iTi 1'i 1T1T1 �O iTT n ® Alb j1 i I I LI 11LLLLJI _ Ili j j I � i l l l l l - I i � i ► � � , � J NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN , that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 7.5 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. . NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of . the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt 'a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions , and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, ,and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in, or owning , property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests. or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of. the State of California and. bonds will also be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars . The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these. proceedings: A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, paving , streetlights, drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE. from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and -telephone facilities, drainage facilities - and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition , if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is hereby made to the map attached hereto ,showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: ,3D APPROltD AIS TO FMz Z2Iff DMA V. �6NI'A H CLERK Y OF ditV Att°rz'ey HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA DApnty City Attorney gddemeit Nod r-�rT I i I I I III .� ® T(TTfflTTitllTrffT1TT' T .�- -- 1.1111!l;l!.l l;!.!11.1:111111.1_'1! /wZ=r �--77-�� I � I I I I I I I I I II I I I �--i- �O �''�.. ?1� f 1Ti?1TI?�I it friTiT`111'"- • ,i"T!�T; � I I! 8 ,I I � � ' , 26t ® 1111+111.11 1 lili1LL11J.'i L11ll11,!ZO Al 2W !_ la: i�llllli ,,. •.•..I:. i III I �I'�I � !! �.,,;! .,li � � I ! • r 19th 0 111'.11ILI � I I I I I I I I jjll i t II I I I li i l l f I I i I I l - m1 rli ffTl rrrrrn�rrrr!TrTrr �_ — -- • 18th 49) c I I I I I r1l , II ITS- � 17th • Office of the City Clerk N�-otj _ - City of Huntington Beach UZ P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 'qda�@s Q O _r, I i 7_ -it 3 5-t2 TUNSTALL, NAMES W. ET AL 423 1 TH TREET I HUNT 1 NGTON BEACH CA., 92Ej�}8 I I NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that the City Council of . . the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, .and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday, the 19th day of May, _ 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in , or owning , property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof , may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests. or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested- person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California and. bonds will also be issued pursuant un the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4o67 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars. The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these proceedings : ��NGToa 6 9„�ffice-of the City Clerk J'F.— ` City of Huntington Beac MAY 575 - P.0 T`! CALIFORNIA 92648 Rn� _ - P.O. Box 190 ro v I \c�L. ; -- SeN�Fa AddreSS�� unknown Russell M Jedinak 604 18th treet Huntingto Beach, CA 92648 1 I A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights, drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM. AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline , from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities - and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421 , 422 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621, .and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars, reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: APPROftD 015 TG FQ=z Dbh V. A'09 A CLERK � H OF di%V Attorney HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deputy City Attorney - — o _ UILI 1 _....mow—�s-io� I I I I I I I IC,, l, �.1----- _ O I I Ill i III,I III I ._ t 1�,:•i I cc l j i lij � I I I I I I I cc lif 11TTTT ii 1 III ;I I `7 -�Tr r�` r7 rrrT r!n J • UnbI 1 i f' ri 1 1j!!_ uj I � Z — _ _. _ � _�=_ _ ..=.__ o' I 1)L I I 1 a w rTM-1 T77 ® vla • @ , I 1 _;LW_L!1l L L'.j1J 1iL11 i:;_ ' LL Jjui .---_ _ I I I I TtT1T17,:fr �p � A PUU. --L.- i- Il.__ .� . I � ililll _ i VA -74 g_. IIamuaP1ob �. NOTICE OF HEARING ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE .IS HEREBY GIVEN , that on the 21st day of A ril , 3-9 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article . XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT. DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions , and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday_, the 19th day 'of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,. California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in, or owning ,. property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. " All pretests or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Di.vision. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of_ the State of California and. bonds will also be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars . The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these. proceedings : A. The construction of certain street improvements- including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters , sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights , drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST , easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN. AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520, 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620, 621, and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and _ for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto -showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: APPROVkD A)$ TO g9M= Dbh V. A'09PA nn CLERK tO THEOF ditsV ALtort,c�y HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By Deputy City Attorney i - _ Wl -T 1 —�1 � _F -- ILi i T I F7,71'r ill r - 1 _.._► Ll c= cc II � . TT i f11TTT1111 I I IiTf� i if` i?TT .-C1i T i 11111' J @ d • LP61 w . MOL > _� pcL r - - - I 71 - 111111111111 t l`t !iiTTi i117T11TTi �?7 �u 11�L _i111;1.1Lii it I:.LL11i1L1 i.:L - --. - I LEALD a 1Ll TTilFTM�mmlmmllllll - !+ 1i1f T T{ ir�i iiiif�rrr� ® .p A 11111!llllli111 ► i i I � I I I I I I I - I ICI I �- -- . uemu 6 d r j 1 Y i i Office of the City Clerk 1 City of Huntington Beach MAY 2'75 P.O. Box 190 CAUFORNIA 92648 RETUR2. ~'� .•_ ' ' .. _ ro �o - -t 1 3-1 3 CONNOR, ROBERT E. SR. - ,,'1 623 20TH STREET HUNTONGTON78EACH' CA. 92648 L UH NumsEa� IPW NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 7.5 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of . the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions , and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour -and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in, or owning , property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. " All pretests or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911 , " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California and. bonds will ilso be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars. 'The following is a general description of the works of improve- meet proposed to be constructed under these proceedings : i I Office of the City Cledc' City of HuntI -ton Beach (MAY BFP.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92"S 2 '7� `I ro <Q 23-114-13 MAL AYE LA RY 1. 61 19TH S �REET HUNTINGTON EACH, CA. 92648 PW A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights, drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street . EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419, 420 , 421, 422 , 517, 518, 519 , 520, 521. , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars, reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto .showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: APPR0IED O15 Ta g0=_ Db1V V. riGN d4 CLERK 107 THEOF dlxy Att°m"ey HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deputy City Attorney 41LI T I- 1- I Ijl ! i I I li I I i i � III �� III, IIII�� !� �-� -�-_��— •��•':`•;• ," i1�flilr!iTiTfr;i"�i�l": . I I III I I WiLLU ILLLLLLL cc cc . � 11111 I I I I I -L- —II Ii I - --1- p 17i"i� TTTr i11 i I � I I I •� :�+ i �� i I-rr��.-T�'-8� --Tram--rrr�i� , I I n; J e1► m • 4161 (!I��f1 i' IF �- ---._ -- ,--F � o > III I I T I I� C__ I II W ITTT177 I I M7 i 7 i'T!7 �u e III' I T I:' 111 iul! L,_L',;111 r11,1 L'Li ® AIL _1 jj rl'i TfriTTiT71MIFTITFI .p �! ® PUU. v 1J I I I i l l i 11 l l l l l l �_ _ 111LL111 �'• -- AMA - $' r:•Y Office of the City Clerk ®�I ' City of Huntington Beach --- MAY 2 i; , r7m P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNtA 92648 ANp£j��£ _ 23_151 10 MC CLYMONOS, ROY C. 5 „p� 406 19TH STREET 3 "OV HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. �2�$ /�/"7s . i NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN , that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against 'lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without_ compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in , or owning, property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests. or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California and. bonds will also be issued pursuant-_ t:o the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars. The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these proceedings : Office of the City Clerk rY ?- C4City of Huntington :BeacP.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA92648 RETUR r i 0 FENTON, DAMES M. 612 19TH ST EEIT 4 HUNTINGT`03N EACH, CA. 92648 r i A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights, drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN- AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418, 4191 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518, 519 , 520 , 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, .Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto ,showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: ,3D APPROIF-D PIS TO MM: Dbh V. ii09 A CLERK H AE OF dlxy A�Ltorn+�y HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deptty City Attorney LAD __ , I:If— IT 17"1 U-LLLlllL11LW Li. cc cc 4� �-1,:7li ' � 1,�1- t___7 •� O U161 LU I Ii - -i - s c . I I I II I j l N a it AIL I I' 'lli HMIWH Jl' .i1ll l.W i U L'.L11LUlU cs. . -- - -1- --�-- -- J IT"i17, 1i ml—iri1 f1iTft1 A ILLUiLwiLA 11�!� ® PALL. �► — ; l l l 1 1 - vemueplob • � wr.r. NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301. (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE .IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the 21st day of April _ , 19 7.5 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN , that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without. compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in , or owning, property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof , may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests. or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911 , " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of. the State of California and- bonds will ..also be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hc,re.by made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars. The following is a general description of the works of improve- ,ment proposed to be constructed under these. proceedings : i • Office of the City Clerk City 1 Huntington Beach �°N BF NG " MAYS t• Pik ` Y P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 9 �:. 1575 F,y s °o'FR c Add��sS�e 4nkn�k'4 . Connor, Robert E. Sr. AP 23-113-13 627 20thStreet Huntingtozn Beach, CA 92648 A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights , drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities - and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520, 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED; ,30 j APPR04ED 04 T4 PQM-- Dk7�1 F'. 6Nfa CLERK HCITY OF 6iltsy Attornay HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By! Deptty City Attorney gowenwelt -a op A two UiLL, IFFI .._ y' - TI=i i FITITFIM n 1TI itTr 8 � ' 21Aall o - i1LLL.1_!_L Lu ilLL>LL i m � '20th Z ri H 'f i l l 19th 0 • :i.l l.!L1L11.:.1_i:'!i!1!ll�_ - _y'i:1i;.�J.:il1 i " i''!' � (�11.11!_L111111111111.111'!I � • FTMTPTTFM*n-!TiTT TJT. - 18th (9 � � I (L ( _T_I - - I ! ► I i � I i I l i l l 17th — - NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS 1IEREBY GIVEN , that on the 21st day of A 19 75 , the City Council_ of the City of Huntington Beach, Cali ornia, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions , and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that Monday, the 19th day of May, 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour -and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 . " Any persons interested in , or owning , property within the district proposed to be assessed to pay the cost and expenses thereof , may file with the City Clerk , prior to the time fixed for hearing, written protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911 , " being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of. the State of California and bonds will also be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference i.s het.eby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars . The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these_ proceedings: i o Office of the City Clerk �- J/ �0 N BF j hGTON .� City of Huntington Beach MAY 5 0) �_ d� .•s�t T°- 2 t Q M MAY P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 9264E 1975 S 2 5 •�.Ca iF =—� ° _M_Te 5' _ S fi ft°OFR � I �dd�eSSee I - Connor, Robert E. Sr. AP 23-113-13 625 2 th Street Hunt ngton Beach, CA 92648 1W A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks , driveway approaches , paving , street lights , drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN. AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street . EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue .to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving , underground communicatibn and telephone facilities, drainage facilities " and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422, 517, 518, 519 , 520 , 521. , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on .the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto .showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: APPROIED AIS TG FQ=z Dbh V. r(69PA CLERK 'OF THE CITY OF d3xv Attorney HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deputy -City Attorney (ALI ---��--A1—. :_-Q._:::� �__ �_-�� iII ► i I I li I I I I I I 60 i �� iii i ��—_�—_��__ .�•.�:,� ,-- �r'ri;li?ii?fTi'?'iir�;. - cc A !� 4181 ii l i Ijll I j l I I I I I cc i TT i 111TTTiT)1i I i iTTT T^ -T?i fT 17 TM 111'1' J • 4161 - i -I IT 1—.— JL —— —-- WIM > cc I Ili i i 771 777 11`7 !I I I I I I�I�L T`l P7T TT7T C�1J i LW�l.l.u, .I..illlilllJ::Lli. --r-- —�— -- --- 77 17r)1rTTir`)fllTilTlTlTiTf 11111111111111111111L1 — 111LL111 ® PuLL i I III 2) Pik Ac� —.— .<. I,srru sp oa `b ` r►° HIGH RISK-EXTENSIVE PRC DIWICULT OR PAPRATICAL OVERCOME 40,�1 '� - 3 ��••° M HGH RISK-MAJOR PROBLI BUT CONTROLLABLE THRC Y Fr :� DESIGN AND/OR SETBACi o EM PROVISIONAL RISK-MP101 r '•y �r a,} J{i MODERATE PROBLEMS • j O NORMAL RISK-MRX PROBLEMS �. - - + — ,G ,t d s ~ ► TT[OODTeD#W I RCIQEM AATSt.SGIE 6 lfiAi1VE 7 ' AW If NIEEDEO TO E A GENRAE GUM FOR T4AN, TTONS:EALLT NNlE 2WL RAT OEPOS . Q. POT M M.EACH E1109p)AND TRMWA,NSAM R!. ALLT EIDIA®FROM CONSORA1gN WERE OW 9WM t*A#WW So6S.AIM SAID PAW GGOLPCVA R►OONEMS AND ROOD NAZAW NIX Di ki SOURCE AE*KTON-TEN&ASSOC 5 ® Assessment District Fiqure 9 HUNTINGTON BEACH cauFORNIa PIANNING DEPARTMENT GEOTECHNICAL LAND USE CAPABILITY Mi PLANNI HYDROLOGY The area covered by Assessment District 73-01 is part of the lower . Santa Ana River watershed. The district is situated on the Hunt- ington Beach Mesa at elevations ranging from approximately 30 to 40 feet above sea level and 20 to 30 feet above the floodplains of the adjacent river gaps. As such, the assessment district will not be subject to a flood hazard from the U.S. Army Corps of Eng- ineers regional Standard Project Flood.22 • At the present time, runoff caused by local precipitation either percolates into the 22 acres of remaining vacant land in the dis- trict or collects in the streets and flows down the gentle slope to storm catch basins along Pacific Coast Highway at 22nd Street 42 As the district develops, area available for percolation will rapidly decrease and surface runoff will increase thereby increas- ing the potential for local flood hazard. Decreased percolation will result in a lowering of the groundwater. table with a subsequent I loss of surface soils moisture in the area. The proposed drainage system will mitigate the flood potential as • the area develops . A trunk line will be constructed along Orange Avenue between 17th Street and 22nd Street with catch basins at 18th, 19th, 21st and 22nd Streets (Figure 10) . Preliminary plans from the Huntington Beach Public Works Department indicate that the proposed trunk line will have diameters of 33 inches between 17th and 19th Streets, 42 inches between 19th and 21st Streets , and 48 inches between 21st and 22nd Streets12 It is estimated that the catch basins and trunk line will collect the assessment dist- -24- I • Palm Avenue 1-3 Acacia Avenue o (D (D � (D K rt w (D (D rt m cn ror � z m cn m w rt rt, �I rt o . In �' rt, rt I CL N U1 I C rn rt rt m Pecan cn Avenue to m cn (D (Dm ( (D (D m rt, _fit (D fD (D (D fD rt rt rt, rt rt* 29 . 0 17 .2 20 . 8 24 .5 (62 .5) ■ (45 . 3 24 .5 ............................ .;....;... ..... ......................... .. ..:• •:::.:: •: ::: .............................. :�: .................. ..... ............................................ . ... •Orange Avenue ....•••••• •:: ••• Drainage Line �=F� Figure 10 ..........'.'M: Pick- into s f C Tentative Drainage Plan . . . u, ■ up point • • • (xx) Cumulative C. f. s. in pipe • rict' s maximum runoff at ultimate development (86 . 6 cubic feet per second) and approximately 4 . 9 cubic feet per second from Beachwalk to the north of the district. Interim plans call for storm water in the Orange Avenue trunk line • to be conducted to the 60 inch pipeline at 22nd Street which will then convey the water to the ocean. Based upon current development, Beachwalk would generate approximately 160 cubic feet per second of • runoff into the 22nd Street line during a 25-year storm. This would cause the pipeline to operate near or at capacity. The add- ition of 91. 5 cubic feet per second from the proposed line on • Orange Avenue would seriously overtax the 22nd Street line as conditions approached a 25-year storm. This will represent a sig- nificant adverse impact. However, since maximum flows from the • Beachwalk community and assessment district cannot be adequately accommodated, the 22nd Street connection will be temporary. The Public Works Department has indicated that a separate north-south • line (possibly in 18th or 19th Street) will be constructed at a future date pending the availability of funds .12This line would be designed to serve only the assessment district and the area to the • south. • • -26- WATER QUALITY Water quality as related to the proposed project is significant to the extent that increased land development and population growth in the assessment district will generate increased storm drain out- fall and liquid waste flows which will adversely impact .the coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean. Table. 1 shows a variety of species found in various types 'of effluents and normal seawater contents. Effluents contributed by storm drain systems generally contain suspended solids, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, micro-organisms , greases and oils, and chlorinated hydrocarbons . Runoff from the assessment . district will closely resemble this pattern, containing such. pollutants as fertilizers and pesticides from landscaped areas; vehicle hydrocarbons , greases, oil, rubber, plastics ,. asbestos , paint and metal fragments from the streets; bacteria organisms from domestic animals inhabiting the area; roofing materials asbestos , wood, refractory plastics, metal flakes, paper, and solvents from domestic materials; and oil from areas remaining in petroleum pro- duction.30 Much of the suspended..solids will settle out before reaching the ocean, but typically much soil, carrying toxic materials , organic matter, and micro-organisms, reaches the ocean. Organic matter in storm water has 20 or more times the BOD found in ocean water, pre- senting a hazard to aquatic life if receiving volumes are small enough. ! Possibly more striking is the fact that runoff from street surfaces is generally very high in contaminants relative to other sources. Calculations based on a hypothetical but typical U.S . city indicate that the runoff from the first hour of a moderate to . -27 Industrial Storm Drain Power Plant Municipal Typical Species & Oil Prod- Effluent Thermal Waste Sewage Ocean uction .Waste Effluent Conditions Suspended 20 Solids 40-1000 30-300 20-30 150 Biochemical 20-100 10-200 Oxygen typically 20 less than 1 220 1 Demand Greases & 50-100 10-50 10-50 o, y Oils 1 36 w PH (Acidity) 0 � F- ,p 6. 8-7.0 7.4-7. 8 7. 5-8.0 7. 1 8.2 _ 88 � Cadmium 12 less than 10 source:paint - w tr Chromium ro a y (very toxic) less than 10 - 10-30 341co H - '� o Copper less than 10 - sourc0e: _ r, � 20-50 brass pipes Fl- ro rr m C - '� Lead 70 - less than 10 1.4 - :� H F+- Q F- C o Mercury less than 2 - less than 2 less than 10 O C n ro Ammonia 90 - 34 _ less than 1 Nc En Na. v Temperature 110-145 50-60 80-90 75-80 50-58 (oF) fD High iCroorganisms 0 sour�Ce:Soil 0 1000 per ml. - Aerobacter Chlorinated_ High Hydrocarbons less than 10 source:DDT,et 0 - - heavy storm(brief peaks to at least inch per hour) would contri- bute considerably more pollutional load than would the same city' s sanitary sewage during the same period of time (Table 2) 47 The control of urban runoff and its impact on regional water quality is . so poorly developed that, at present, the only effective mitigat- ing measure is to .process such runoff in a sewage treatment facility. This assumes at .least some collection by siltation basins . Presently, no siltation structure is proposed for the Orange Avenue or 22nd . Street drainage lines. Assuming a suspended particle diameter of one millimeter (i .e. , the approximate size of sand) and an equal distribution of particles between zero and one millimeter, effluents . entering a moderate size siltation structure could have at least 40 percent of their suspended solids and all floating oils and mat- erials settle out.16Therefore, it is recommended that a siltation structure be included near the ocean outfall at 22nd Street (or in the future, at the outfall of any new drainage line extending from Orange Avenue to the ocean) to minimize degradation of coastal water quality. Municipal sewage is generally high in Biochemical Oxygen Demand and suspended solids. Several other agents are present in mun- icipal wastes including cadmium, chromium, copper, lead and ammonia. These exhibit a variety of toxicities in the ocean environment. The assessment district itself will, when fully developed, generate about 2. 2 pounds per day of BOD per person, or a total of 4 ,211 pounds per day. The ocean contains about 66 . 6 pounds of oxygen per -29- • • Table 2 CALCULATED QUANTITIES OF POLLUTANTS WHICH WOULD ENTER itECEIVING WATERS - HYPOTHE:TICAL CITY STHF. KI' SURFACE RUNOFF RAW SECONDARY (following SANITARY PLANT 1 hr storm) SEWAGE EFFLULTIT (1b/hr) (lb/itr) (ib/hr) Settleable plus Suspended Solids 560,000 -1"16o 130 BOD5 5,600 1 , 100 110 . COD 13,000 1,260 120 Kjeldahl nitrogen 880 210 20 Phosphates 440 50 2.5 Total coliform bacteria (org/hr) 4000 x 101�� 460, 000 x 101U 4,6 x 101I� Source: Tables 37 and 38. The hypothetical city has the following characteristics : ® Population - 100,000 persur►s • Total land area - 14,000 acres a Land-use distribution: residential - 75% commercial - So industrial - 20% ® Streets (tributary to receiving waters) - 400 curb miles s Sanitary sewage - 12 x 106 galirlay. It should be noted that these calculations are for a Situation in whi(A; streets are cleaned (intentionally or by rainfall) on the average of about once every five days, Thus, the above discharge of contaminated runoff could conceivably occur many times in a vear. On the basis of this information, there is little question that street surface contami- nants warrant serious consideration as a source of receiving water pollution, particularly in cases when such discharges of contaminants coincide with . times of low stream flow or poor dispersion. -30- • million gallons. This means that in order to degrade the waste produced by the assessment district it must be diluted by at least 63 million gallons of .water per day in the ocean. However, since the assessment district contributes only .14 percent to the present' waste treatment plant load, this increase is considered insignif- icant. • -31- AIR QUALITY Due to the secondary impact of possible growth inducement, air quality will be adversely impacted. The sources of this hazard are automobile emissions, space heating exhaust, and vapors from motor fuels, solvents, . and paints, generated by that induced growth. The amounts and types of emissions produced by various -sources are well known. Table =3 shows the- ;1972= Orange County Emissions Invent- ory and measured quantities of air- pollutant emission species for different sources (The emission measurements- for -1973 have not yet been made available at the time of this writing) . Automobile and fuel emissions cont-ribute- over 98 percent of the total emissions in Orange County.14 These emissions 'include 1-arge quantities of carbon monoxide (CO)' oxides of 'nitrogen (NOx) , and hydrocarbons (HC) . Rel- atively small amounts of oxides of sulphur (SOx) , lead and other metals, and asbestos; are lower in- comparison with the three major emissions.-- Stationary sources, which include power plants , space • heating, and industrial emissions , produce particulates , hydrocar- bons, oxides of nitrogen, and oxides of sulphur. Space heating sources which will occur in the assessment district can be expected • to emit very small amounts of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon in the form of natural gash Other sources noted are aircraft , rail- road, and marine sources which are not applicable to the assessment • district. I Fable 4 depicts current California Air Quality Standards , along • with number of days that standard was exceeded in 19.72 . The list- ings in Table 4 which most typify present air quality in the Hunt- • -32- Table 3 ORANGE COUNTY 1972 EMISSIONS INVENTORY AVERAGE EMISSIONS OF Alit CONTAMINANTS INTO ATMOSPHERE (TONS PER DAY) • Hydrocarbons � EIiISSI0i1 SOURCE P--arti- Total All Reactivity culate NOx sox CO Emissions High I Low Total :latter Combined STATIONARY SOURCES PETROLEUM 1. Production 4 2. Refining 3. Marketing 10 10 20 4. SUBTOTAL 10 10 20 4 24 ORGANIC SOLVENT USERS S. Surface Coating 9.0 9.0 6. Dry Cleaning 3.0 3.0 7. Degreasing 1.2 2.1 3.3 B. Other 1.0 11.0 12.0 9. SUBTOTAL . 2.2 25.1 27.3 27.3 CHEI•1I CAL 10. Petrochemiril 11. Sulfur Plants 12. Sulfuric Acid Plants 13. Pulp and Paper 14. Other 0.1 0.3 15. SUBTOTAL 0..1 0. 3 0.4 METALLURGICAL 16. Ferrous 0.1 17. Non Ferrous 18. SUBTOTAL 0.1 0. 1 MINERAL 19. Glass and Frit 0.15 0.50 20. Asphal* Batching 0.45 0. 15 21. Asphal• Roofing 22. Cement iroduction 23. Concrete Batching. .0.10 24. Other ^.10 0.05 1.4 25. SUBTOTAL 1 0.80 0.701 1.4 2.9 INC IHE RAT ION 26. Open Burning (dumps) 27. Open Burning (backyard) 28. Incinerators 0.06 0.14 0.06 0.2 29. Other • ^. SUBTOTAL 0.06 . 0.14 0.06 0.21 0.5 NOX = Oxides of Nitrogen SOx - Oxides of Sulfur CO - Carbon Monoxide -33- ORANGE . COUNTY 1972 EilISSIONS INVENTORY AVERAGE E.'1ISSIONS Of AIR CONTAI-IINA14TS INTO ATMOSPHERE (TONS PER DAY) Table 3 (cont. ) Hydrocarbons EMISSION SOURCE Reactivity Par ate Total All culate NOx sox CO Emissions High Low Total Matter Combined STATIONARY SOURCES CO!43USTION OF FUELS 31. Steam and Power Plants 32; Yearly Average 1.8 11.0 12.8 33. 34. Other Industrial 0.7 6.6 0.1 35. Domestic and Commercial 36. Yearly Average 0.9 1.8 5.5 1.7 37. 3 SUBTOTAL (Daily Av.Yr.) 1 0.9 4.3 1 23.1 12.8 1.8 42.9 AGRICULTURL 39: Debris Burning 0.08 0.07 0.01 0.28 40. orchard Heaters 41: Agr.Product Processing Plts. 421. SUBTOTAL 0.08 0.07' 0.01 0.28 0.4 43. TOTAL STATIONARY SOURCES :2 35 48 6 24 18 2 98 HOGILE SOURCES MOTOR VEHICLES 44. Gasoline Exhaust 267 99 366 8.4 244 7.5 3880 45. Gasoline Blowby 6 2 8 0.2 1 46. Gasoline Evaporation 22 26 48 47. Diesel Powered 4 4 1.9 26 1.0 16 48. SUBTOTAL 295 131 426 10.5 270 8.5 3897 4612 ** 187 91 278 1 10.2 194 8.5 11727 (2218)** AIRCRAFT 40. Jet Driven 1.4 1.2 0.9 0.1 1.7 50. Piston Driven 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 13.1 51. SUBTOTAL 1.5 1.5 3.0 1.4 1.0 0 52. SHIPS AND RAILROADS • 53. TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 296.5 132.5 429 12 271 8.8 3912 4633 ** 188.5 92.5 281 12 195 9.0 1742 2239 ** S-. GRAND TOTAL 09 �68 477 38 2)5 27 3914 4731 ** 01 28 1 329 1R 219 27 11744 (2337) ** aox = Oxides of Nitrogen **Calculated under former 7-Mode Cycle Sox = Oxides of Sulfur CC = Carbon Monoxide -34- . Table 4 AIR QUALITY 1972 CALIFORNIA DAYS CALIFORNIA STANDARD EXCEEDED 1972 MAXIMUM** POLLUTANT AIR. QUALITY ANA_HF'IM COSTA LA HABRA LOS ## COUNTY * REASONS FOR AIR QUALITY STANDARD READING STANDARD MESA LAMITOS WIDE. Oxidant Prevention of eye irritation and possible including 0.10ppm for lhr 61 29 115 25 126 impairment of lung function in persons 0.40 ppm Ozone with chronic pulmonary disease. j Nitrogen Possible health effects could occur at Dioxide 0.25ppm for lhr 6 4 7 5 14 slightly higher dosage. . 0.43 ppm (NO2) Produces atmospheric discoloration. 10 ppm avg for Carbon 12 hrs. 17 12 49 14 62 Prevention of interference with oxygen 23 ppm. Monoxide transport by blood. (CO) 40 ppm for lhr 0 0 0 0 0 34 ppm 0.04 ppm avg - 1 Sulfur 24 hrs." 0 0 2 6 8 Prevention of increase in chronic 5 m Ln Dioxide (S02) respiratory disease on long term exposure 0.50ppm for lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0.25. ppm Lead 1.5 ug/m3 30 12 5 12 9 12 Higher levels have shown progressive 6.0 u9/m3 (Pb) day avg. months months months months months increase in storage of lead in body. 60 ug/m3 annual Avg. Long continued exposure may be associated geometric mean 105 67 120 85 AGM with chronic respiratory disease. 120 ug/m3 (AGM) uy/m3 ug/m3 ug/m3 µg/m3 94ug/m3 Exposure to a combination of suspended Suspended - particles and sulfur dioxide may produce Particles acute illness. ;9�� 3 51$ of 3 100 ug/m days > 19% 67% 39% 45% 38`ug%m 24 hr avg 100ug/m3 ## This station replaced by E1 Toro station for post-1972 measurements . * This is number of days standard exceeded at one or more stations in Orange County. ** Highest reading averaged over period prescribed by air quality standard. • ington Beach area are those of the Costa Mesa and Los Alamitos stations. The low number of days on which the air quality stand- and was exceeded indicate that this area has relatively high air • quality within Orange County. Any additional pollution sources , particularly in the form of automobiles , at current emission stan- dards , will tend to lower present air quality due to cumulative • effects. Compliance with 1975 automobile emission standards will reduce this tendency significantly, and, even in the presence of increased numbers of automobiles, air quality may improve. • Comparing the motor vehicle emissions in Table 3 to the 961,454 trucks and automobiles in 1972 in Orange County, the average pounds per day per automobile for each of the emission species listed can be determined. 32 Species Average Daily Emission per Auto (Pounds/Day/Vehicle) Hydrocarbons (426 tons/day-961 ,454 vehicles) x 2000 lbs .=0. 8861 Particulates 10. 5 " if =0 .0218 NO 270 of =0 .5616 x SO 8. 5 =0 .0176 x CO 3 ,897 =8 .1064 Total 4 ,612 =9 . 5935 The assessment district is expected to generate 1 ,109 vehicles (See Traffic Circulation Section) . The following table depicts total assessment district emissions in pounds per day for this quantity of vehicles , and percent each specie will contribute to 1973 poll- ution predictions. -36- • Table 5 LIGHT DUTY VEHICT•E (CALIFORNIA) EXHAUST EMISSION FACTORS $ Low mileage vehicles, recently tuned-up. Model Year Exhaust Emission Factors at low Milea9e_ (grams/mile) (Exhaust) Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons NAMM Oxides pre 1966 87 8.8 3.6 1966 ' 51 6.0 3.4 1967 50 4.6 3.4 1968 46 4.5 4.3 1969 39 4.4 5.S 1970 .36 3.6 5.1 1971 34 2.9 ' 3.5 19724 19 2.7 3.5 • 1973-74& 19 2.7 2.3 1975b 1 .8 0.23 2.3 1976 1. later• 1.8 0.23 0.31 &Estimates Based on the Relationship of low Mileage Emissions to Standards for 1971 and Earlier Controlled Vehicles. b8ased on Estimates. These are not Test Results. -37- • Total Pounds % of Predicted 1973 Species Per Day Orange County Emissions Hydrocarbons 982. 7 / 463 .0 Tons = 0 . 1% per Day Particulates 24 . 2 / 11. 4 01 = 0 . 1% • NOx 622 . 8 / 293.0 to = 0. 1% Sox 19. 5 / 9. 2 go = 0. 1% CO 8, 990. 0 / 4 ,232 . 0 0. 1% Total 10, 639 . 2 / 5 , 008 . 0 0. 1% These figures assume emission standards which are in effect as of • 1973. Table 5 shows measured exhaust emissions in grams per mile through 1971, and then depicts expectable emissions due to pollu- tion control equipment installed in cars after 1971. The years • 1975-76 and later depict predicted amounts after implementation of 1975 control laws. Note that in 1975 allowable emissions are re- duced by about a factor of 10. This means that as time proceeds from 1975 more vehicles will have the control equipment and impact on air quality will be reduced. The Environmental Protection Ag- ency indicates that six years after enactment of the 1975 control standards (or 1981) 65 percent of the cars in operation will be equipped with the control devices . This means that in 1981, there should be a reduction of 41 percent of emissions due to the re- • placement of current automobiles by newer models generating fewer emissions. • Because the offsite parking improvements of the assessment district will generate 885 marked spaces and because there will be a slight reduction of spaces (139) at ultimate development, the Environ- mental Protection Agency regulation for review of new or modified indirect sources of air pollution will not apply to this project. • -38- . FLORA AND FAUNA Throughout the assessment district, the vacant land is the potential site of a variety of common weeds and grasses . The developed parcels are either completely surfaced by concrete or have small garden plots of ornamental bedding plants , shrubs , and trees. A few lawns have been planted in front of residences , and in one or two of the larger yards vegetables have been planted. Plants observed are common to the vacant lots throughout the area. Those plants .include wild oats (Avena fatua) , slender wild oat (Avena barbata) , foxtail (Hordium leporinum) , Ripgut grass (Bromus diandrus) , Bermuda grass (Cnodon dactylon) , cockle burr(Xanthium strumarium) ,and milk thistle (Silybum marianum) . Trees have been planted which in- clude the genuses Eucalyptus, Acacia, and Myoporium. The only wildlife observed was a jack rabbit(Le us californicus) living in a vacant lot amongst the weeds.. Although. no other animal life was observed, there may be assorted species of lizards, birds , and rodents present in the district. The impact of the proposed improvements and subsequent residential . development on existing vegetation and wildlife will be . minimal. The improvements of the assessment district will interfere with only that land along street pavement required for installation of sidewalks and curbs. All other activities except possible construct- ion-related vehicular movement will be contained on land which is now paved. In addition, the vacant land of the assessment district has been shown in the Land Use and Traffic Circulation sections as being rapidly. consumed by residential development not related to the -39 • project improvements, and previously seriously impacted by vehicular movement due to residential construction and oil production. A third consideration is the Huntington Beach City Council Resolution • No. 3858 which requires that all "noxious or dangerous" weeds , refuse, and dirt be removed from the district. Notices of this action were posted in all of the vacant areas wherein the above • vegetation and wildlife were observed. Communication with the City Public Works Department has indicated that all land containing weeds would be disced by tractors and that remaining vegetation would be removed by hand by a weed crew. Where development is expected only minimum chemical spraying is being used; however, along shoulders • some soil sterilizers may be used. Under the heading of a positive impact is the fact that no mature • trees will be removed by the improvements of the assessment district , but at least 294 trees and a variety of shrubs will be planted as part of those improvements. This will substantially mitigate the • minimal loss of natural vegetation and may attract additional wild- life to the area. • • • • -40- PALEONTOLOGY, ARCHAEOLOGY, AND HISTORIC LANDMARKS A survey of paleontological, archaeological , and historical re- sources within the City of Huntington Beach was conducted by Archaeological Research, Inc. , in 1972 and submitted to the city early in 197338 This report indicates that there are no known paleontological sites, archaeological sites, or historical land- marks within or near the assessment district. However, it was . stated that it was quite possible to encounter paleontological resources (marine vertebrates and invertebrates, as well as terrestrial vertebrates) on the Huntington Beach Mesa where older Pleistocene alluvial deposits exist. Fossils would most likely be encountered within the assessment district where the surface soil has been. disturbed more than five feet or by soil erosion. Although archaeological sites are known to exist along the bluffs of the Huntington Beach Mesa, there is a remote possibility that archaeological resources could be uncovered in the vicinity of the project. Therefore , unless precautions are taken during im- provement and subsequent residential construction in the district, there may be a significant adverse impact on .paleontological and archaeological resources if destroyed. • • • -41- • LAND USE • In 1904 , the Huntington Beach Company acquired what is now known as the Townlot area, and subdivided it into 117 . 5 foot by 25 foot beach. lots. Streets were paved, and water, electrical , and tele- phone systems were installed. Townlot developed as a residential area and remained so until oil was discovered in the 1920 ' s. Im- mediately the area was cleared and covered with oil production • equipment and pipelines . The area now encompassed by the assess- ment district remained in oil_ production and was zoned "light industrial" until the early 1960 ' s. In 1962 , the whole district • was rezoned to R-2 and R-3 (Figure 11 ) . However, the district has continued to be dominated by oil production (R-2 and R-3 designations are combined with oil production zoning designations • in scattered lots throughout the district) and it was not until after 1970 that the first residential complexes were constructed. Figure 12 depicts present land uses. The assessment dis- • trict is typified by road pavement and vacant lands . Thirty-nine percent of the area is in street rights-of-way. Most streets and curbs are in ill repair and sidewalks are non-existent except • where new developments have been constructed. Of the 36 net acres , two acres (5 . 6 percent) are devoted to a community center at Orange Avenue and 17th Street, 9 . 5 acres (26. 4 percent) have • been developed for residential uses , and 24 . 5 acres (68 percent) are vacant or in oil production. Puddles of oil stand around op- erational oil wells, and piping, wiring, and equipment remain at • • -42- P1 NNING DM 10 9- 6- H a SECTIONAL_ DISTRICT MAP 10--h- 1I CIT 1 OF .uir:l t. :rSFrn -!. b60 st�'<'.- t. .• - _ __.•[• �I iJnNl�•. JR D:FANCE !1G l.E•3END: HUNTINGTON I3E,NCH too 7 12-7 5[ 378 e-"•-7i. - •!I r.tY •[sle r.:r os•••:: J_ z 2i 55 p"i7.69- !o72 7 1-1t. rrli vs ^er..,:.0 :•.r,NrrC:., af•�K' ORANGE C() Li NTH' , CALIF0RNIA 11 AMENDED BY ZONE CASE x m; r s rz ',a; :..b.•r c:. eococa w• �.+ 6.7-77 ".5 t.:r,nE:• . +D•: vneoue,:o. :. .Fe.• 234,291.M2,916,67-16,!!-DI,M-10,;1-1.7i-77.7i-SIlC1,71-711�-71-71�,71-JIIs'1,71-7tlW,tl-SIfN{71311J1, i u - :53 brurrcG B•.n .vE on•F.:a at nvFl: 71-i11G1,11.711BI,TY-16R1.T2•a7, 'n° .:;? :.-2G"!5 ee >• -n sE'a'r.rn.vE orl s..e sEvcu,. (f°•� °`M2-01 qp - '. -y' l-" .'� "•s� caFstnr:,rry cic.wboucrw - CI \ ------------ - - -- - '--. . . \fiE M2 `'> \\� coy' Al, It r :: �e o�/per V, /rc . > Cwa'�?\¢ 4�p OCR �AV04 x / �`Q'p�/\ �cl� •`lc/f �r P�� r r�./%pP do Q . t� �M/ j \ Figure 11 1 -43- . ♦11111111111 111111111111 11111111111 1111111111111 11111/111111 11111111111♦ •1111111111 }? 1111111111111 �111111/1111 � 1 '1�1'11'1'1'1'1'1'1'I 11♦/1111111♦ 1111111111 �111111111♦/111111111111 111111111111 �♦111111111�111111 111/1/ •11/1111111 S 1111111111111111111/111 11111111111i ♦111111111,11111111111♦ 11111111111 11111111111►111111/1/11i 111111111111 r1111111111�111111111111 111111111/1• 11111111111/11111111111� •1/1111111/1 •1111111/1�111111111111 ♦1111111111 ►j1j111j1j1j1j1j1j/jljlj �j1j1j1j1j11111jIj1/1j� 111111111111� 111111111111 111111111111 111/1111111 ,�� 111111111111 11/111111111 11/111111111 11111111111• I�� 111111111111� 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 111111111111 ♦11111111111 �� 111111/11111� 11111111111111111111111� 1111111111♦• :::::::1 1111111111 N -__ ►1111111111111111/1/11111 • • -_ , , ►11111111111111111111111 , ___ __ ' 1N 1111N N♦ ♦11111111111 11111111111♦ ♦1111111111� � , __ H111111111♦ �1111111111♦ , ♦1111111/11� 11111111N N 1111111 N N 1 /11111111111 11111111111r • i11111111111 •1111111111r 11111111111MORE- • i1i1�1i1i1i1i1i/i1�1i1i 11�1i1i1i/i® ®• •® r1111111111♦ N 11111111 h ��1 S4N1111111♦ 11.11�1.1 N11� Center OR Noun - • - 1111111111♦ • - • - ♦11111 intervals throughout the undeveloped portion of the .district. Much of the open space has been marked by trucks, drilling vehicles, earth-movinq and weed-mowing equipment, and equipment and vehicles involved in residential construction. Traditionallv, the assessment district has been devoted to oil production and several pumps are still producing. About six .dozen oil storage and separation tanks are operating,- and there is a large oil-related compressor facility located in the center of the district. About 10 percent of the land is devoted to oil production. The most significant area of oil production - lies between 22nd and Coldenwest Streets , running the entire width of the district (Figure 13) . Some of those lots along 22nd Street are held by owners in small parcels, and where oil production has become unprofitable some of that land has been sold for resi- dential development... Several lots throughout the .assessment district are devoted to oil-related utility buildings , storage yards, obsolete equipment and oil piping storage , and abandoned well sites. Even though the district lies on the border of one of California' s most productive oil fields , the wells in the district are only producing a few barrels of oil per day, along with large quanti- ties of .salt water. As oil prices increase , the feasibility of oil production from some of the now non-producing wells may in- crease, so that more of the land now devoted to oil. production -45- r r r � venue • 1 + + + + + + t -� + 1. r + • # -f- + + + • ' • • -�- + Q + l + +• ♦ + + + + + L+ 4- p + + + �._�••�••�.r. _ Orange A e r Well capable of Figure 13 • p producing Abandoned well THIS CHART DEPICTS MAJOR OIL LINES AND KNOWN WELLS . IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ALL p Well producing at time of report INCLUSIVE , AND AS SUCH MUST BE CONSIDERED ONrY REPRESENTIVE OF THE GREAT NUMBER OF __Pipeline UNDERGROITND LINES THROUGHOUT THE DISTRICT. OIL PIPELINES AND WELLS IN !?'HE ASSESS�,IENT DISTRICT. will be maintained for that purpose instead of for development. To date , four permits have been issued by the city to recom- mence pumping at wells. not currently in production in the assessment district. Estimates by the City of Huntington Beach . Oil Field Department indicate that oil production may continue for another 15 years , most of that activity to remain located between. 22nd and 23rd Streets.11 As property value in that area increases, however, some of the owners of oil parcels may be encouraged to abandon oil operations and develop their land. A potential zoning conflict which may arise as the assessment district approaches ultimate residential development is the main- tenance of the present "O" designation on 18 scattered parcels after oil production has ceased and residences have been con- structed. If oil production again became economical and was re- sumed, it would be incompatible with surrounding residential areas. The rate of residential development is rapidly increasing. Ris- ing land valuations emanating from the district' s location in an urban environment have increased the demand for higher inten- sity use: . Oil removal within the district has been drastically reduced recently —and probably only a small fraction of the. present oil reserve will remain after another fifteen years, leaving most wells in the .area unproductive. This has increased the incentive for landowners to develop their land. A third -47- • factor that has rendered the district more developable is the increased demand for a residential environment of ocean-oriented living. A final factor which has and will greatly influence the shift of • vacant land to developed uses within the assessment district focuses on the city' s zoning and planning policies . Under current Townlot zoning regulations , the R-2 portion of the district may be built at one dwelling unit per 2 , 000 square feet or 21. 78 units per acre and the R-3 areas may be built at a maxi- mum rate of one unit per 950 square feet or 45 . 85 units per acre. As indicated in Figure 11 , twelve blocks in the assessment dis- trict are zoned R-2 . The existing development in this portion of the district is a combination of triplexes, duplexes , and • single-family residences. The maximum number of units that can be constructed per block is 41, which means a worst case total unit count of 492 at ultimate development. However, current de- • velopment and ownership patterns indicate that most of the blocks will not be constructed to maximum density. If there is no future consolidation of parcels, the most probable number of units per block will be 35, and total count at ultimate development will be 421. Five blocks in the assessment district are zoned R-3. Fourplexes are the most common type of development in this area. • Although the maximum allowable density is one residential unit per 950 square feet (or three units per 25-foot lot) , present devel- opment standards have limited development to a maximum of four • • -48- units per 50-foot lot. Since most of the R-3 blocks have been broken up by fourplex development, the maximum number of units per block will be . 59 , which means a maximum total of 296 units within_ the R-3 area.41 When combined with the R-2 units, there will be a probable total of 717 units and a worst case total of 788 units at ultimate de- velopment. However, the Townlot Specific Plan/Assessment District will. revise the area' s density standards to permit a probable total unit count of 857. Although the proposed offsite improve-. ments will increase local property values and savings on street . improvement expenditures , the costs of these improvements will be quite high for property owners. As an additional incentive for owners to participate in the assessment district , the Specific Plan will permit an increase in density in areas where various levels of lot consolidation are possible. As indicated in Appendix A, maximum development intensity and incentive are provided by combinations of 4 , 51 14, and 28 lots41 Thus, the proposed project (improvements and density revisions) will have a. beneficial impact on property owners, which in turn will stimulate .a higher rate of residential growth and the con- struction of more units (857 units as opposed to 717 units under existing zoning) to meet the general housing demand within the city and county. However, the positive impacts emanating from increased residential densities over present standards will have to be weighed . against concomitant indirect adverse impacts (i .e. , .-49- • decreased air, water, and acoustical quality, and increased demand for public utilities and community services) . The • extent of these impacts will be analyzed in the appropriate sections of this report. • Existing residential developments have difficulty meeting pre- sent parking , open space , and yard requirements . The current bedroom combination in the fourplexes now being constructed in • the R-3 areas is one three-bedroom and three two-bedroom units per fourplex. Thus parking standards require that four covered, 2. 5 open, and two guest parking spaces be provided on-site for • each fourplex. In order to provide adequate parking and meet open space and yard requirements, guest parking is now allowed offsite in the street right-of-way. To comply with the parking requirements , developers are creating garages and parking spaces that are usually inaccessible or difficult to use . Conse- quently, most parking now occurs offsite in the street or alley right-of-way or in vacant lots. Meeting the parking, open space, and yard requirements is less difficult in the R-2 zone, but guest parking is provided offsite in the street right-of-way, and • it is still difficult to provide a high level of on-site amenity and comply with existing parking regulations .41 Future residential developments will conform with the parking im- provements and on-site standard revisions proposed in the Townlot Specific Plan/Assessment District. Implementation of the Specific Plan will have a substantial positive impact on future residential • • -50- development in that the local parking, open space, and setback problems will be largely alleviated. The Specific Plan recommends that existing parking standards not be substantially changed. However, several important changes in the district' s parking pattern will occur. Each dwelling unit will have one covered on-site space; .all other required parking will be provided -offsite in the parking courts or parking areas . provided .by . the assessment district improvements and which are accessible to the affected residential units. The cul-de-sac im- provements will result in a change of land use on the street rights-of-way. by closing the area to through traffic and convert- ing ten street sections to parking courts. The institution of offsite parking will minimize the on-site parking problem and allow open space and setback requirements to be met. Another parking change will be that all parking be provided on-site if the 41 subject parcel is a minimum of 28 lots or 1.8 acres. As a result of the above alterations , and assuming that parking will be prohibited at some future date. on the four bordering arter- ials of the district, a total of 2 ,2.26 parking spaces (1 , 181 on- site spaces and 1 , 045 offsite spaces - 885 marked and 160 unmarked) will be _provided in the assessment district41 This will adequately meet the city ' s. (1 , 973 spaces) and the Coastal Commission' s (1,814 spaces) requirements for the area. By allowing a large portion of the parking requirement to be provided offsite , the Specific Plan/Asssessment District will result in a reduction of available -51- • spaces when compared to the existing street pattern and trends of development in the area. If there is no Specific Plan or parking court improvements, 1, 615 spaces would be required on- site (which would be difficult to satisfy under existing lot configurations) while 750 spaces would be available in the streets. This would result in a total of 2 ,365 required and available parking spaces , whereas the proposed project results in a total of. 2 ,226 spaces , or an anticipated reduction at ultimate develop- ment of 139 spaces. The simultaneous provision of parking to meet anticipated requirements and the reduction of spaces at ultimate development will be beneficial impacts. Present developments indicate that required open space areas are inadequate in that they are too narrow, too small, or too distri- buted to provide a usable amenity for the projects . The Specific Plan will mitigate this problem by requiring a minimum dimension of 20 feet of recreational open space measured horizontally from any window on the ground floor 41 The present setback requirements are inadequate for the type of medium high density developments in the district. Five-foot and • four-foot side yards produce bulky appearing buildings with narrow shafts between them which tends to reduce light, air, and ventila- tion. According to the Specific Plan, the five-foot setback will be adequate for the 25-foot and 50-foot lots as long as the build- ing height does not exceed 30 feet, or two stories. However, on a 100 foot wide lot a 15 foot combined side yard is the minimum • • -52- that is adequate. As the building height increases over two S stories, then the setback requirements will be increased pro- portionally. Present standards require a five-foot setback for garages facing the alley, but allow second stories to overhang to the property line. These requirements are produc- ing buildings which are awkward looking, as well as creating a congested atmosphere in the alleys. _ The minimum rear yard setback will be five feet for two-story buildings except that 50 percent of the second story can extend to the rear property line without creating a confined wall effect. The front yard setbacks are presently" ten feet and four feet. The Specific Plan will standardize all front yard setbacks at a minimum of ten feet.41 The assessment district is surrounded by a variety of activities which will affect the general open space situation (Figure 14 ) . To the southwest, the Townlot area has undergone extensive devel- opment, leaving little vacant land. To the northeast, the Beachwalk community is rapidly developing and will consume the majority of the remaining old golf course within the next two years. The Huntington Seacliff community to the northwest has completed its development adjacent to the assessment .district, and contains the 141-acre Huntington Seacliff golf course. West of the district lies land not yet developed by the Huntington Seacliff project, and the Huntington Beach oil production area. The area between Orange Avenue and the ocean remains predomin- -53- Beachwalk Development 1Prop Huntington 2 . 5ac Old g; C '10 Seacliff park cou rs, / I- RI-0 Development CIA IFIIJE pr6'P_w j parks , 0N N N ON N N N N CC a: Op IMalin IAI Open Space (Huntington 11 Future 11opment) Development) cc Seacliff Futu gm [ V x cc QC U Oil Production FC3 CI-0 9 C1_0 • CI-0 C1 State Beach P A C i F i C 0 C E A N Figure 14 LONG-TERM LAND USE EXPECTATIONS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AMENDED BY ZONE CASE- antly undeveloped , although during the past year there has beci-i a g.rowi.nq trend toward residential development much as has occurred in the assessment district. The assessment district will contribute to this general trend toward residential land uses. Approximately 644 residential units (in addition to the 213 existing units) will be construc- ted and open space in the city will decrease. by 24 . 5 acres as a result of the project. However, neither the land occupied by the district nor the immediate surrounding areas (with the exception of two proposed parks and the Huntington Seacliff Golf Course) are considered valuable open space areas (Figure 15) . In this context, development stimulated by the proposed pro- ject will not be in conflict with the city ' s open space plans and designated priority open areas. -55- i LEAST w F=fir OPEN SFA.Ci VAi UES A.-U &fLA7"!g FROM+.e:.ST IO LIGHT.TO DARK INJiCAT'NG THE MOST VA',`IAk.L`.AREAS FOR CFEN MOST x l �P2 oil HU NTINGTON BEACH C iFORNIA LANNING DEPARTMENT F1C�UY2 15 OPEN SPACE VALUES DEMOGRAPHICS Findings in the November, 1973 , Special. Finance Census indicate that the average density per dwelling unit in 2-4 unit developments throughout Huntington Beach is 2. 59 . Findings in the assessment district itself show that den- sity varies between 2.. 36 and 2 . 58 persons per dwelling unit. Since 1970, residential development has occurred in the assessment district and growth has been moderate. Between 1971 and January 1974 , 96 units were built in the assessment district., establishing the growth curve in Figure 1633 If the trend is reliable, ultimate development of 857 dwelling units will occur by 1991, generating a maximum population of . 2 ,220 persons at an assumed density of 2. 59 persons per dwel- ling unit. The 199.1 growth figures for .the district will be used for comparison throughout the report as representing the most probable situation for the assessment district. In 1991 city population is projected at 243 ,.420 , according to the Huntington Beach Growth Study25 Of this, the 2 ,220 persons maximum expected population in the assessment dis- trict would account for . 91 percent. The Growth Policy Study shows city-wide population density at 3 . 14 persons per dwel- ling unit, decreasing steadily over the years to 2 . 84 , im- plying a trend toward multi-unit development. In the assess- ment district, density over the years remains at about 2 . 0 persons per dwelling unit, implying the development of 5-9 -57- 857 •�•�� • Figure 16 •�' 0 800, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ASSESSMENTk*DISTRICT 73-01 By Generation of Dwelling Units �.•� 7 0 0 �•'� O 0 600 �•'� S 5 0 0 �.•` m •• -p • 4 0 0- f••�. 44 �• O ••• 300- �.•` 100- 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 Year • -58- unit apartment buildings. However, parcel configuration in the district is more conducive to building triplex and four-plex units , and therefore the density of 2 . 59 pet- sons per dwelling unit will be used for estimates. There are some factors in addition to the improvements made by the assessment district which may modify growth rate. The area is of high interest to developers desiring to ex- tend the appearance trend of Huntington Seacliff and Beach- walk. Its proximity to the beach, school facilities, golf course and park areas, the presence of oil operations on individual lots, etc. , are other factors and these will be looked into in later sections. The critical. question is the degree to which growth rate will be stimulated by the improvements and standard revisions of the assessment district. Upon completion of the project, the presence of new streets , cul-de-sac parking areas, storm drains, street lighting and signs will present the appearance of a planned community. A previous experiment in Huntington Beach to employ cul-de-saced streets was an impressive fail- ure; however, there is considerable developer interest in establishing cul-de-sacs in this undeveloped area42 Property value increases after improvements may be a gauge of growth stimulation prior to actual growth. The development standard revisions of the Specific Plan will stimulate growth primar- iiy through the provision of increased density incentives to developers. The density revisions would permit the construc -59- tion of 857 units, or an additional 140 units over the 717 probable units expected from present development trends in a the district. This increase in allowable building activity would generate 363 persons above the expected 1 , 857 persons generated by 717 residential units. It must be added that, of those residents of the assessment district in 1973 , about 36% moved there from other parts of Huntington Beach and about 20% from other parts of Orange County, so that the impacts generated by "new" city resi- dents are much less than those calculated o In any case , the most stimulus which could occur is ultimate development im- mediately, such that the 2 ,220 person population of the assessment district would still be only 1. 55 percent of the f current Huntington Beach population. This type of "worst case" example will be applied to other considerations. M • -60- ECONOMICS Revenues to the city with respect to residential considera- tions are from both City and State sources . City sources include retail .sales tax, business licenses, utility taxes , and mobile home tax. The State of California provides "in lieu" revenues on a per capita basis from State-collected taxes. These revenues include monies from alcohol and cig- arette taxes , gasoline tax, and motor vehicle fees.37 Additional fees are collected for a variety of purposes. One of major interest is the "in lieu" park use assessment fee. Instead of dedicating land at a rate of 5 acres per 1, 000 people for parks, the developer may pay a fee' of $33, 065 per acre of development to pay for city park land. Figure 17 shows the various revenues and expenditures for the city, divided up by housing type and density. City expenditures. are made through several funds. These are Police Department, Fire Department, Public Works Mainten- ance, Refuse Collection, the General Fund, and the Non- General Fund. Assuming a current building trend toward four-plexes in the assessment district, it can be expected that a minimal net revenue gain of $34 per acre may be derived from resi- dential development (Figure 17) . Considerably higher revenues could be derived from condominium or apartment construction; -61- LA TY kcVtNUt/EXFbN111 i ut%c PER ACRE SUMMARY Figure 17 Singl. Mobile Condo. Condo. Condo. 4-plex Apts . :pts. Apts . I'aT11y !tomes (7 un./ (12 un./ (15 un./ (14 un./ (lS un./ (20 un./ (30 un./ un ., (3 . ; un ., ac. ) ac. ) ac. ) ac. ) ac . ) ac . l 1c. ; REVENUE Property Tax 5 580 $ 155 S 629 $ 809 $ 916 $ 775 $ 56S S Retail Sales 'J'a 270 272 -194 504 630 588 630 S3;1 1 �r•0 Per Capita Rev. 400 300 420 721 901 841 761 Uhl 1201 Bus. Lic. Fees - 20 - - - 84 90 121 181) Utility Tax 120 132 144 252 312 252 276 c .' S4 Trailer Lic. Fee - 289 - - - - 1370 T_I168 14 77 2286 T2759 2540 $2325 2930 4172 EXPENDITURES Police $ 28S $ 187, $ 217 $ 372 $ 465 $ 616 $ 660 $ 880 $1320 Fire 269 _269 269 269 269 269 269 269 269 Fub. Wks. taint. 320 144 144 144 144 320 144 144 144 }4isc. Gen. Fund 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 201 Non-Gen. Fund S88 491 607 896 1070 1012 93S 1070 13S9 Refuse Collect. 110 - - - - - - - r— TTFFT— — TTS-5-r— 2 2 0 9 y 3 -3 Net Gain or Loss/Acre/Year -S 403 -$ 124 +$ 49 +$ 404 += 610 +$ 34 +$ 116 +$ 366 +$ 8797 CONIiARISO,N OF CITY REVENiJE/EXPENDI URE PER ACRE OF RESIDLIM AL JSE j REVENUE EXPENDITURE 0 IoOG 2000 3GOo 400C 4500 ;rT;e of Use Density Singe Family 2 un./ac. i y M un./ac. t . 5 un./ac. Mobile domes 8.5 un./ae. t i t Condominiums 7 un./ac. �' f + J 1 12 un. /ac. i d 15 un./ac. i Four-plexes 14 un./ac. ! `' Apartments 15 un. /ac. tl 20 un./ac. 30 un./ac. however, due to small-parcel property ownership, four- plex construction yields .the highest possible revenue return. The. construction in the assessment district tends , due to high property values, to deviate favorably from the estimates in Figure 17. Using the estimation method found in the Huntington Beach Revenue/Expenditure Analysis of Land Use, . the following table .for the assessment dis-. trict was derived: TABLE 6 Predictable Revenue Per Acre in. Assessment District at Current Market Value and Tax Rate _ Assessed Total Taxable Rev/Acre = Value/DU Land Val. = (Assess Tax Value = Mkt Val Value DU/ Val) x DU/Ac+ x Type Mkt. Val. (.25)/4 Acre 1 Acre Land Val. .0162 Triplex $40,000 $2,500.00 $11,000 12.6 $42,500.00 $ 688.50 4-flex $57,000. $3,562.50 $11,000 16.8 $70,850.00 $1,148.00 Assessed Value = 25% of Market Value (construction + land) Revenue = $1.62 per $100 of Assessed Value 1. From Revenue/Expenditures Analysis of Land Uses, Huntington Beach Planning 10/73, p. 30 2. Property tax rate is $1.62 per $100 assessed valuation. The table on the following page shows all revenues and expendi- tures for the assessment district applied by acre and by district: -63- TABLE 7 Net Gain for Assessment District Expected Revenue Assessment Assessment Revenue Study 4 Assessment Assessment Standard Revenue District 3-Plex District 4-Plex 4-Plex Property Tax $ 688.50 $1,148.00 $ 775.00 Other Revenue1,4 $1,765.00 $1,765.00 $1,765.00 Total Revenue $2,453.50 $2,913.00 $2,450.00 Total Expenditure 4 $2,506.00 $2,506.00 $2,506.00 Net Gain/Loss Ac. -53 +407 +34 Assessment District 2 3 Total Gross Ac. 38 19 57 District Total Gain/Loss -2014 +7733 +1938 Net Gain for District: -2014 + 7733 = $5,719/year Net District Gain , Over Fig. 18: -2014 + 7733 - 1938 = $3,781/year 1. Other revenue: Retail Sales, per Capita, Business Licenses, Utility Taxes. 2. R-2 Zone. 3. R-3 Zone. 4. From Figure 17. 5. Gross Acres x Gain per Acre = Net Gain. Note that there is a considerable positive excess revenue in this district. Revenues for school purposes reflect a similar net gain. Fig- ure 18 shows revenues predicted from the Revenue/Expenditure Analysis. Calculating school revenues from total taxable value from Table 7 and using a taxing rate of 6. 89 percent,lit is seen that triplexes yield $2 , 928 .25 per acre, and four-plexes yield $4 , 881. 67 per acre. Expenditure , made up of $3 ,185 per i -64- PER ACRE OF. RESiDWTIAI USE _ Figure 18 EXPENDITURE G 100d 70u0 Val L c.. J S C U c r.s w- JE un./.C .4 un./ac. i 5 un./ac. u ri Hobi:e i,omes 8. 5 un./ac. 4 ii Condominiums 7 un./ac. E H 12 un./ac. E H 15 un. /ac. H :our-plexes 14 un./ac. E H E A),,rtments 15 un./ac. H 20 un./ac. E H E Elei,entary _ 30 un./ac. E _ H H High School SCHOOL REVENUES/EXPENDITURES PF:R ACRE: OF RESIDENTIAL USv Elementary- School HiZh School Type of Net. Net Total Development Revenue Expendit. 2ain1Lo. Revenue Expendit. Gain_l.oss Gain/Loss Single. Family Estate $1,137 $ 917 +$ 220 $ 777 $ 371 +$ 406 +$ 626 (2 un./ac. ) Single Family Estate 1,625 1,834 . 209 1,110 742 + 368 + 1.59 (4 un./ac. ) Single Family (5 un./ac.) 10116 2,293 1 ,127 796 9Z8 - 132 - 1,7.59 Mobile Homes 311 149 + 162 212 109 + 103 + 265 Condominiums 1,262 1,593 - 331 862 539 + 324 - 7 (7 units/ac. ) Condominiums 1,622 2,730 - 1,10R 1 ,108 92.2 * 1.86 922 (12 .units/ac. ) Condominiums 1,838 3,413 - 1,S75 1 ,256 1 ,152 + 1.04 - 1,471 (15 units/ac, ) Four-Plexes 1,SS5 3,185 - 1,6 3(J 1 ,062 1 ,075 - 13 - 1 ,643 Apartments 1 ,139 2,100 - 961 770 576 + 202 - 759 (IS units/ac. ) Apartnicnt s 1,423 2 ,100 - 677 974 log + 204 - 473 (20 uni is/etc. ) Apartments 1 ,989 2 ,100 J t l 1 .3g� J . 157 ♦ 207 r30 units/ac 1 —69— i acre for high schools and $1, 075 per acre for elementary schools , equals $4 , 160 per acre.37 Net gain in this case is $721. 67 per acre , or $2 ,364 . 67 per acre over the $1, 643 loss estimate published in Figure 18. • With respect to park land requirements, by submitting "in lieu" use fees the development of the 34 net acres of land in the assessment district would yield a total of $1,124 ,210 at • a rate of $33 , 065 per acre. In summary, due to the rising property values in the assess- ment district, a net yield in revenue of $5,719 per year might be expected from saturation by dwelling units in the assess- ment district at current tax rates. School taxes may yield • as much as $24, 536 per year over expenditures district-wide. As the improvements of the assessment district cause property value to increase, it can be expected that revenues will in- crease. All the aspects so far discussed are economic factors which are expected to occur regardless of the improvements of the ! assessment district. Two questions remain which are unanswer- able at this point. The first is what significance the effect growth of population in the assessment district will have on local commerce and industry. Sudden growth may cause a local deficit in shopping facilities or product availability. Sec- ond, it cannot be determined how fast the residential devel- opment in the district will occur due to the project improve- • -66- merits and, therefore , at what time .these increased revenues- may be developed. According to the 1973 Special Finance Census , about 16 per- cent of all residents in Huntington Beach. are employed in the city. Since the assessment .district generates no sources of employment, the city would have to have available about 227 jobs at an average income of $10, 000 per year each. It is beyond the capability of this report to evaluate the abil- ity of the city to provide these jobs , although it is possible that various planned and currently developing sources of em- ployment, 'including the Lusk Industrial Park, will be able to provide the jobs necessary. As discussed in the Introduction section of this report, the estimated cost of improvements for the assessment district will be $2 , 040 ,192 . This includes 15 percent assessment dist- rict incidental expenses. The city' s share of these costs will be $392 ,146 or 19 . 0 percent, while the remainder is distrib- buted among the district' s. property owners. The average cost to each 50-foot parcel will be approximately $8 , 660. Since the per parcel costs are dependent upon location for the im- provements necessary, the costs to property owners will vary from $5 , 600 to $11, 000 per 50-foot parcel. Some owners may feel that these costs are prohibitive, but costs must be weighed against the tremendous economic , aesthetic, and amen- ity benefits of the project. -67- • PUBLIC UTILITIES • Water The City of Huntington Beach draws water from eight waterwells and three Metropolitan Water District connections. Storage is . in four reservoirs. Total daily pumping capacity from all sources is 95. 5 million gallons per day (MGD) or about 133 cubic feet per second (cfs) . Additional reservoir space is reserved • in the San Joaquin Reservoir, and there is an emergency con- nection between Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley, and a proposed link to Seal Beach. • Average daily consumption city-wide during 1973 was 22 MGD for the estimated 143 , 000 persons and supporting community, commer- cial, and industrial users, at an overall rate of 147 gallons per day per capita. Maximum day was recorded at 35 MGD or about 233 gallons per day per capita.2 • At its ultimate development , assuming 2 ,220 persons consuming 147 gallons per day each, the assessment district population will require a total of about 326, 340 gallons per day from the water source, or about 1. 48 percent of current city usage, and . 34 percent of current city supply capability. This would represent a worst case situation, because the daily consump- tion rate used for the projections is based on consumption for all land use types. According to the Huntington Beach De- partment of Public Works, residences normally consume approxi- mately 60 gallons of water per day per capita. • -68- The .assessment district -is currently connected to the city • water system at _two local points : at Goldenwest and at 17th Street (Figure 19 ) . Public Works engineers have det- ermined that the lines would be more than adequate for the expected population.35 The only potential limitation for the system is possible inadequacy of quantity and pressure for fire fighting demands, and this aspect. requires further liaison between Fire Department and Public Works personnel. Sanitary Sewer The assessment district has an existing grid system of 8" - sewer lines situated in the alleys (Figure20) . Each of these 8" lines can sustain a flow of . 5 cubic feet per sec- ond (cfs) , which is equivalent to the requirements of about 2, 700 people. Each area of development typical of the assessment district can be expected to contribute . about 0. 013.2 cfs to the sy.stem.39 Figure 21 shows expected quanti- ties at various points of the system. Assumptions of per capita generation of 59 gallons per day and a peaking factor • .. of 2 were used. Using the assumption that only the assess- ment district contributes to. liquid waste load, the loading on sewer lines will be about 29 percent of capacity at ultim • ate development, using Figure 21. However, there are two . additional major sources - the Huntington Seacliff and the Beachwalk developments , which sewer through the assessment district. The portion of Huntington Seacliff which can be expected to contribute to the, assessment district facilities -69- I N •, • INNuINIll WIN II I•. in NAINNHI INlfllhlnl I ►NNInNNII ?INNNII all Ii1N bl�lt�lnu �uuNlli i � _.� Y11wHN IN gnflnNl IgllNillgp; II "On q�11ggI1N�INIM1lN • ; _ �iN Nlfilin�YpgIINgC� �N�YNIIN"�laiNtllNr�N11 INS IINNIIiIAN WHOP' NNNNNIIp�N1iNi�11N1 i�ll� M �N{mmoo no RuNgolkl` Noun" ounow NNNN{Iul is 0 - a= 1NN ��I��a �IlNNNI�I � �NNNIINNIfIM16NIN{I41 INN ORONO WORK. . NIIAAHN ati{�flNq INNI�IINq NNNNIN AHill Nn ININlUIN � gNIIANNA NIgINNH �NNAAAN al{1Aiai �NItAIIbN AIN NNNNIINN ININNNI�+ �g ANnNggH INIn1Y1�1 IAH N{{INIlRI�i iiNNN �Ual AII�AtyN a111ggN; HIN NIA aI�NNIIq IIi1NNNNN I:N:,NdMN gN.dYtillil � itl� L�f1NiN NIN{alAlt +�INN�ANM tiNANiM'AANANHH INq NNNNIIII ANNllttq a� 1�IW�AN�"�111 ' Ila NpHN1AI NIMNN 'MNtNIN�'iNNN�I A�RN = IIN NNINNAIM I�igNIN N1:1N Zw= nNggA/A q1M{{{Apq LIMN Yq� III�gINI mor • = IN�ttf{WlHp. NI{AlN;iJ"� !1� N��III�IIA MINI >' IAM INS' R�NAAIIA �� 1A1� NNNNA I�tlf IYNN_.Atlilnil!�{ III� NNNN Nlrp NI;I fli►11NNNi Mrlalw NIA w'r �� "e � MiINNNNN CNIIlINMI � NNlANINN NNNNNNIi ,N�INN NIINMIN IIN�N�I � Ilia NNpI!• tIMM�NtI MIIi�IMM� IIIMllpgt � � NNNINI� NNI�I .NNNMI� NNN�I NNNgNIW. NNfi � � aiA 'wi Ir aNalaN � tlMlll ININIIIII IIINIUIINII IUliil111111 � NMIIINN aNarNN IM�1 N�I{1 Itl{ NINIw �, NpNN MNgNNINI pNrINNINi . N N ' MMMIIIuw tw2 IY111NMYA i A 111111MIll M � • `, INN YiNN� /, • � aaNl�l tIIG N - IIAM � - e Emir NtIIMYIam utAAIIY SIMflaw . .. gyp : �■p�pp�p�� q�pO noa�ln � � ' ° ' RANNNNR tIHINNNII 1111101 Mill 1 pNsiflulla a No FM : t11M� tour A�Nhllnia MOM tl: uANAYA�NMlIti aN�tit anlia�lt HIRRIA YIN MMMMIF t �N11pN ��NNIHu �tNNNMIN kalaaNNa MU f uk-iIINuUIIIIAAIm iO1111tM NNAi i til ■ HHHNHHA�iINNNIINII HHHaI1H,';, fowl OURTNINHgo lop ' NIINgPdq NIIIYgAp AANgUN� UIIUA�� NINAY NUS ;� UI�NUHUN NIIUNNna HII Nab HUNalI IaNaI�IM N6 Im1nmlUi NNNNNHN aa � I�NNAHN NUIINYai N� aNIINIINU NIIII�NIIa NNNHNNr, ata�glq aNgNaNN _- ..":m'INI.Y�°N�.".p�:"AII �III�INAAN Aflll ice' tlUl ..i.. NaaaHHq at�NHNY „talulaN HaaaN�l N�► mmHHHn NtNtNtu All WIN fingulloutuil _aI�Ng1� 4001111HMl UNIMIN NOW= ul NIHHHIIIN NIii1NAN N HS HININ UNq q `.M HaNaNNN HaI�NNHa Hopes _ .. gNNNgItN U�IHN aatfsa Ii1UNN aaaNliUU t V • mom HN1�HHa Gq�IgNC_ afggNqlHl aNNIINNryI .. VITT � �IBItA® iUi �NIiiUG UAUNAgN AiIUNiIIN ��F CNN NNNNIMN MMUHHP MOM no m1NN11pU oqu1 � wall "NOW aNII G IIUIItUNq Ilt�p�N NIII •• �I�NMINI pyNNMNe NNIINIfN{! �IINIWN NpuNNN N� IL • __.____. �tillli��fllll!}Ijlilll �_ t� Figure 21 1 0 .24cfs from • ::.;...................:..t:.�.•:.................. •.............. • ��• . 1e2 achwa lk• . •... ................... . n. XV., ::::: ::: . Palm Aven . 12R-2one ; •.:.:.:. , • • • Gene ation • • • • • • j0_2(c f s a ; ` 026 .026y . 026\ .038\�. . 0A0 02\• Aca is Avenue • • • • • 053\ .053` 1.053 .065\ 06 Pecan Avenue • • • • • • R-1 Zone • • • • • Generation • (D =.02cfs/ac • • • • 1�41 • • • . co 0� .08\ .08\0 .2� .253\• .001 Ora ce Avenue : 3 cfs :...... . j PaEQmff • • i • • 12" aline • • • • • • i \ • a) .47 • •11� .11'• . 24\ • .29\• . 02\6 14 o N 1 Avenue ,c x +J 4 U 14 • 11 f,, • {"', • I 1 • U N • • N • N • N N0 � �• .13 • . 13 • .�8• .�• .�3• Walnut Avenge T b • • • 2:2cf s i 0' • • • f rom 0 • • • • • • other • • • ownlo . 53 . 145 .145 • .3 .35 • . 0660 areas Pace is Coast Hiqhvjay "67� •.82 •1 47 1 536 3 74 �� —1T'r tr n ° c �� c f s� Maximun Capacity or • O'City SewerLine SEWAGE FLOW IN AND AROUND am ■County .Trunkline THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AT :r;*;�:Assessment District ''�•••• ITS ULTIMATE POPULATION All Measurements in Cubic Feet PerjSecond (cfs) -72- is fully developed and may be estimated at 0 . 35 cfs (assuming 500 units on 87 . 5 acres of R-1 zoning and the above standards) . Estimated full development at Beachwalk is about 1, 300 per- sons, which gives an effluent production of about 0. 24 cfs. At ultimate development the system may become overloaded at two points! cumulative flows in the sewer line between 22nd and 23rd Streets (due to the flow from Huntington Seacliff) and on the trunkline after the combined contribution of the entire Townlot area exceeds line capacity. Communication with Bruce Witcher of Orange County Sanitation District' s Out-Service Planning confirms a proposed plan to replace the present Pacific Coast Highway 16" trunkline with a new line of larger diameter within five to seven years48 Huntington Beach Department of Public. Works has indicated that, as capacity is approached along the 22nd and 23rd Street line, a new line would be built along 23rd Street to accommodate the effluent from Huntington Seacliff; however,. no proposed plan exists at this time. At its ultimate development, the assessment dis- trict will have lines fully adequate to carry its own sewage production. However, its contribution along with the contribu- tion of surrounding developments may overload parts of the system if updating of the system does not occur. If the assessment district grows at a rate appreciably greater than its present trend, capacity may be reached in the system sooner than expected, but more likely surrounding areas will prove to have the greater impact on the system. -73- • Sanitary treatment facilities in Orange County serve about • 1. 35 million persons at about 152 million gallons per day. Total peak capacity is 305 MGD with an average capacity of 184 MGD. Present flow leaves 32 MGD reserve over the aver- age capacity. City-wide rate of effluent, including com- mercial and industrial uses, (rate = total flow : population) is about 112 gallons per day per person. • At this rate, the assessment district will increase present plant loading by less than 0. 249 MGD, or about . 16 percent of present load, . 13 percent of average capacity, . 08 per- cent of peak capacity, . 77 percent of present reserves, all of which, in themselves, are insignificant. • All effluent from the assessment district is treated by Sani- tation District Plant No. 2 , which consists of primary treat- ment only. Plant outfall is dumped into the ocean through a • 120" diameter diffuser pipe along a 6,000 foot length begin- ning 21, 400 feet from shore. • Sanitation District estimates show cumulative growth in the county to exceed plant capacity prior to the year 2000.19At any rate of growth, the assessment district represents only • . a minute fraction of present load. • • -74- Solid Waste Disposal Orange County Refuse Disposal Engineers estimate that house- hold daily per capita solid waste production is 5 pounds , varying between 5. 5 and 4 . 5 pounds per day per capita_ as popu lation density decreases and increases respectively?' Assum- ing this rate, the 2 ,220 persons inhabiting the assessment district at its ultimate development would produce an average of 5. 55 tons of solid waste per day, or 38 . 9 tons per week. Rainbow Disposal Company has indicated its capability to ac- commodate this increased load now, as well as in the future. Rainbow stated that they transport in the vicinity of 100 tons per day to the Coyote Canyon Disposal site, the majority of which passes through the County Transfer Statiori43 Of this , the assessment district at ultimate development would contri- bute only about 5. 55 percent to Rainbow' s current operation, this decreasing as other areas increase requirements in the future. Orange County has indicated in the past that the Coyote Canyon Disposal site had remaining about 10. 5 million tons capacity in 1973 , and that capacity will be reached by 1977. Exten- sion of this dump into another canyon is being considered, ex- tending dumping life through 1979 . Present rate of filling of the dump is about 3 , 900 tons per day.21 The assessment district at its ultimate development will only contribute . 14 percent of that , which is insignificant. -75- • Electric Utility Street lights are planned at each intersection of two streets , • and of one street and one alley, and at intervals of 150 feet along each street (Figure 6) . There will not be street lights along alleys. Where a cul-de-sac exists , a single street • light will be placed along the street centerline on the side- walk. Approximately 90 street lights at 185 watts each are expected to be installed. These light units are of the mercury • vapor variety, producing almost 40 lumens of light per watt of electricity. 23 Assuming that these lights will be in operation 12 hours per day, the total energy consumed would be 5 , 994 kilo- watt hours (KWH) per 30-day month, and is slightly higher than the electrical consumption of an average residence .for one year. • According to Southern California Edison representative William Compton,. household. electrical consumption in this region is about 474 KWH per month as of April, 1974 .8 At this rate, the • 857 dwelling units may be expected to use 406 , 218 KWH per month, or 4 . 88 million KWH per year. This represents an in- crease of less than . 01 percent of Southern California Edison' s supply capability. It is anticipated that the proposed under- ground power lines will supply -the electrical demand of the assessment district at ultimate development. However, in light of potential fuel shortages , curtailment and interruption of electric service could become a reality and yield a signi- ficant adverse impact on the electrical supply capability of • the Edison Company. • -76- Gas Utility According to the City of Huntington Beach Building Depart- ment, the residences of the assessment district at full residential development may be assumed to be 25 percent electrically heated and 75 percent natural gas heated. This would indicate about 643 homes using natural gas . An aver- age figure for multi-residential gas consumption is 95 , 000 • cubic feet per year per unit.17 This means that the gas-using residences of the assessment district would require 61. 1 mil- lion cubic feet of natural gas each year, or . 08 percent of the Southern California Gas Company' s supply. In summary, all of these utility demands will occur in the assessment district whether or not the project occurs . If growth occurs at an increased rate, the need for this energy will occur sooner. The impact of this need is reduced greatly by the fact that, city-wide, 54 percent of those persons mov- ing into dwellings are coming from within Orange County. • • -77- • COMMUNITY SERVICES • Education The Huntington Beach Elementary School District has indi- cated that Federal and State-wide estimates of . 65 children • per dwelling unit for elementary school child generation may be high for Huntington Beach. The figure of . 5 children per dwelling unit was considered a good conservative estimate • for the area and the types of development expected28 At this rate, the assessment district could be expected to generate a total of about 429 elementary and intermediate grade school • children (kindergarten through 8th grade) . Existing adjacent to the assessment district site are Dwyer Intermediate (grades 6-8) School , and Smith Elementary School • (grades K-5) , with capabilities of 840 and 650 students each. These schools are located on the corner of Palm and 17th (Figure 22) . • It was noted that with the extensive development of Huntington Seacliff, Beachwalk, and the assessment district, a careful • look at school needs has been given. Child generation in the area could be enough to support several schools; however, generation trends are showing a decrease such that existing • schools could potentially support the entire load. Bus trans- portation has been suggested to balance the children between schools in the case of disproportionate generation.28 • • -78- OCEANVIEW SCHOOLS NOT SHOWN: FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOLS NOT gHCA6; Nueva View 92 Cox 854 McDowell '28 Pountai^ ':a'. i1• h WESTMUNSTER HIGH SCHOOL 2,7L5 Star View 690 Fountain Valley 717 Moiola 849 a Vista View•- 720 ti Fulton 719 Niebla_ 722 t ~ ° C.is!er 876 Oka 'kc% ° •°l ♦♦ ,�� _ / Harper 725- Plavan - 442 ` \�. ��♦ � 624 .` Tamura /px ri` ` ,cr �+ �' °'-35;i Juarez resch-3aI cf r4 51 C / 910 \ 369 ♦♦♦♦yam• '♦• ��ttix hh� •r 452 ♦♦+0335 ♦ gco 32 �+ g �i ez. �� ♦ ;� 870 �( 6ib ♦♦i ♦♦ / fit 298 •1• + �' • ♦♦ ••♦ 570 yuP• wP 6 30♦♦♦♦ • 521 Y '3' ♦• 29ty •690 00 • t�i ♦♦♦ ••�' ♦ •• • ,� ♦♦ ♦.,• • /930 • � i 510 ��++ ......♦{ B40 4 r♦660 ,f • . * r♦♦♦ 2'b87a`4ll 990 3,062 �o • ` ♦♦ RM14GTON BEACH ELD&NfARY ■ f k c + ♦♦ mod16 .( ++• c • �: twarh 1�0�OQQ1� �'`� .50 C f> v y • 770K ♦y�" ffC CfMFf .40 '�^ t `.\ _ '•; SEk MACH 2 !LEl MTI l.SF ya �' ELEMENTARY ��•"�"•"� ••••• �• • ".....".. ... .: dJ� r T ..r \ .f.WA% 3D0• t District R[SfYT;T CFMrff Td' y'IT ofc.srnf c,,. NIMWGTUN PKlC:Off ff.:^ . Off 11.r4E!TO ST.TU - Fiqure 22 HUNTINGTON BEACH 04LIFORNIA RED CROSS SHELTERS (SCHOOLS) =schools CAPACITY -district lines • Only one additional school is planned, but there has been some discussion between landowners and the school district • concerning development of a school and park on the old golf course site at the corner of Palm and Goldenwest. At this point the subject remains at the discussion level only. The Huntington Beach Unified High School District was able to make precise predictions of school children generation for • the proposed assessment district for each grade in their jur- isdiction, through the use of their computer data-link with the University of California at Irvine. 13Given that the total • number of dwelling units would likely be 857 with a density of 2 . 59 persons per dwelling unit as previously calculated (and also a density of 2.. 8 persons per dwelling unit which • the school district commonly uses as a standard) , the district determined the following: Children Housing A.D. Total A.D. Total Grade Generated Type Mult. at 2 . 59 at 2 . 8 Level Per DU Factor Pers/DU Pers/DU 9 0. 294 . 0. 03 19 . 58 21. 16 10 0. 306 0 . 03 20. 38 22 . 03 • 11 0. 294 0 . 03 19 . 58 21 . 16 12 0. 247 0. 03 16. 45 17 . 78 TOTAL: 75 . 99 82 . 13 • The high school students generated by growth in the assess- ment district would all attend Huntington Beach High School. Enrollemnt in that school as of May, 1974 , is 2 , 641 students . • Total capacity is 2 , 687 leaving a reserve of 46 seats. It would be difficult to determine the rate at which high school • -80- students would be' generated compared to induced growth rate. But comparing the total students to seats available, it is obvious that the school capacity would be exceeded. However, since several other high schools in the area have enroll- ments in excess of published capacity, the small aggravation contributed by the assessment district is only a small part of the overall school situation. Police Service Present Police Department manning level is 170 uniformed officers, or about 1.186 officers per thousand .persons as of the November, 1973 , census. Police estimates show that their manning rate is closer to 1. 1 per thousand persons. The Department has indicated that,. toserve the 2_,220 persons that are likely to be generated within the assessment dis- trict at full capacity, the addition of two uniformed officers and two additional patrol cars would be sufficient. 5 If growth of the assessment district occurs faster than the force can increase its numbers to meet the demand, the 1. 1 of- ficers per thousand will be reduced to about 1. 08 officers per thousand persons. This reflects no significant impact un- less the manning rate of 1. 1 is a critical limit below which security cannot be maintained. Fire Protection A critical factor from the point of view of the Fire Depart- ment is the time required to respond to a call, referred to -81- • as response time. It is the goal of the Fire Department to maintain a response time of 5 minutes. In order to do this , the Fire Department prefers to avoid congested traffic areas, narrow streets, and restrictive street patterns. Upon re- viewing the street pattern proposed for the assessment district, Deputy Fire Marshal Captain Andy Vanderlaan indi- cated that the cul-de-sac patterns would seriously hamper the ability of the Fire Department to respond to a call46 He strongly recommended the elimination of the cul-de-sacs along Acacia Avenue, and one blocking Pecan Avenue at 18th Street, for two reasons: the presence of those blockages would elimin- ate straight-through access to interior parts of the assessment district, requiring long, circuitous routes and, in the case of the Acacia Avenue cul-de-sacs, the requirement to travel • along a divided boulevard, Goldenwest Street, to gain access to one-half of the district. Additionally, due to limited street width and lack of turnaround area in the intersections, cited fire equipment would be required to back out of these areas if entered by mistake, severely increasing response time and pos- ing a safety problem while equipment was backing into a busy intersection, as in the case of 17th Street and Pecan Avenue. Problems cited by the Fire Department requiring future study in the assessment district are the adequacy of water pressure for fire fighting and the frequency of placement of hydrants along streets. • -82- TRAFFIC CIRCULATION The assessment district is bounded by Goldenwest Street (cap- acity 45 , 000 vehicles/day) , 17th Street and Orange Avenue . (capacity 20, 000-30, 000 vehicles/day each) , and Palm Avenue (capacity 20 , 000 vehicles/day) . The most recent traffic flows in Figure 23 .indicate that daily traffic volumes on these arterials are well below design capacity. The street .plan design for the assessment district will result in a significant change in the area' s existing circulation pattern. The ten proposed cul-de-sacs will reduce entrances to the assessment district from 14 to 4 (Figure 4) . Primary circulation will be provided via Acacia Avenue to 18th Street to Pecan Avenue to 22nd Street to Acacia Avenue, and via 20th Street. Existing alleys will be widened. to 20 feet to pro- vide .one-way secondary circulation. The cul-de-sac street pattern will discourage straight-through beach traffic and congestion within the district. At present, only stop signs are used to discourage this type of traffic. The parking court concept will function in conjunction with the proposed. circulation plan to restrict beach traffic in the area. By. allowing a portion of the on-site parking requirement to be met off-site in private spaces of the parking courts, fewer off-site spaces will be available to beach traffic. This will reduce congestion in the district. In addition to restrict- ing through traffic, the cul-de-sac circulation plan will be -8 3- 2 _.- P�-W - l of _ C;1 :F� •, S @S I V C• J ' BOL SA AVE IB00 Bloc 6Boo \ � �N G 24ao 9.0 10600 60 a 28M mw zawo 21600 28M TOt9 EL:I:iEp A.-I S100 49M A 90_ sm 7= T600 7600 ,600 260o 16900 fA00 164uo IBB00 22300 a700 19900 IA00 19800 2'-00 AAR&EiZ At E. s � Woo OT900 ,Too smo t SLA R AVE. l900 4000 a00 a - �y T4L 9EST AVE. • li' tn 0: I • 400 Iq0 1000 ELLIS AVE. 2 a: o SCALE- F 00 AVERAGE TRAFIC VO1I111E PER 24 50DOR VERIOO IfQ m g 3 Iid/ N R � R -- - B300 8700 T900 6600 D000 - - ' 1900 2700 4000 �� 1900 6AREIELD AVE. 20000 30000 3600 4200 4300 QAO 3m am YORKTOWN AVE. 40000 A O 9 . 60000 4 cam(; 64M � 0500� 0100� �� 6900� 19800 d DAMS 4VE. 70000 Ca M@ i4{ �Gjf 9Sl 7600 4700� 4700 4200 2400 INDIANAPOLIS AVE. 1973 ,, y1 — b sow 600D 6000 6600 am ATLANTA AVE. N 4 3300 6100 9400 Imw HAMILTON AVE CITY OF �A 'ADO a00 BANNING AVE. - 111MlvGNw 4AOI S-I„OL HUNTINCTON BEACH TRAFFIC FLOW Figure 23 MAP BO 2!M !60 6660 FEET - S.Y J6N Ig74 a safety factor, placing pedestrian and child presence on streets in less contact with moving traffic. Information from the November, 1973 , census shows that ve- hicle generation is between 1. 3 and 1. 65 cars per dwelling unit, or, typically, 1. 5 throughout Huntington Beach. 0 Using a maximum of 857 dwelling units , the number of cars gener- ated is between .1,114 and 1, 414, or an average of 1,286 (not including recreational vehicles)_ . It must be realized, also, that many of these vehicles are not .new to the Huntington Beach area, and probably only a small percentage of them are .new to the South Coast Air Basin. However, the great majority of vehicles will be new to the specific district and the . adjacent supporting thoroughfares. Studies show that trip-ends generated by medium-high density housing are between 5 and 7 vehicle trip-ends per day per dwelling unit, or 3. 33 per vehicle, so that the assessment district generates between 3 ,710 and 4 ,709 , or an average of 4 , 282 vehicle trip-ends per day. Additional load on arterials is generated by traffic proceeding to the Community Center at Orange and 17th and possibly the Huntington Seacliff Golf Course. Statistically, trip-end generation for parks is 1 to 10 per acre per day, typically 4 , and for golf courses , 2-10 per acre/day, or typically, _ 8 .44 . The Huntington Seacliff Golf Course is about 141 acres, generating about 1,100 vehicle trip-ends per day. The Community Center is 2 acres and would -85 generate about 20-50 vehicle trip-ends per day. Additional parks nearby totaling 10 acres are planned, adding about 90 vehicle trip-ends per day average. However, the trip-ends generated by the Community Center and golf course are not considered as part of growth, since they are already in op- eration. The planned parks are outside the district, and so that small addition will not be. considered here. Figure 24 shows traffic volumes at the city' s ultimate devel- opment. Figure 25 shows what proportion the assessment district-generated. trip-end traffic is of current and future flows on- the various street segments. The shaded area of the graph depicts an envelope between high and low projections of trip-end generation. Where the shaded area crosses the "ultimate". flow line , percent of that flow generated by- the assessment district is shown for that segment. If the trip end generation were to go to ultimate immediately, the "worst case , " that percentage is found on a "1973" line for that segment. If trip-ends are generated at the present rate of development without the assessment district, the generation at Goldenwest will be greatest, with 23 percent of trip-ends generated by district sources. Average generation is from 8-10 percent of any given nearby thoroughfare, and decreas- ing with distance and size of thoroughfare. At maximum rate (immediate) development , increases in traffic range from greater than 100 percent down to 11 percent of 1973 flow -86- .� es r N s I ) P . 13 ltntn f Y `-� 20 30 32 1AZg 23 � E SAVE 43 l q 34 24 Sy 21 70 HEIL AVE 17 29 2s 47 19 G) 'f 0 y 9 1 'y 9 At 44 Ss 5 WARNER AVE 37 13 2 6 28 y�► 6s 14 s S . ,20 2 y zo SLAM AVE 5 37 11 20 y1 20 SO 43 ` 7 G e TATAIT AVE 4 µ2 16 21 y y 37 ELLIS AVE �0 1� 33 XZ 3 40 J y 31 .33 2 17 s 3o WFIELD AVE -t Y ;/ CLAY ST. 2Z3 to 19 YORKTOWN AVE 10 J� 1e 37 i3 AgWSAVE 3� 41S91s �9 o S t I S 33 �I 19 19 MWAAMIS +' J 14 , A'FIANTA AVE 40. 3 11 7 Z 3 l Figure 24 +'� XX=Number of Vehicles in Thousands 0� HUNTINGTON BEACH TRAFFIC AT ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT -87- 40 Figure 25 TRAFFIC FLOW PREDICTION GRAPH h Shaded Area Depicts Envelope of Possible Trip-ends Generated by the Assessment District, Showing what s� % They Represent of Street Flow Rates. Arrows De- scribe Flow Rates f6r" 1973 and Ultimate, for Various 35- Street Segments. Maximum Capacity for those- seg- ments is noted. Pacific 'Coast Highway @, Ultimate FlowjPCH Cap. 45 ,000+) Goldenwest (between Yorktown,Palm) @ Ultimate flow r� 3 0 A l4 Q, > Goldenwest (between Palm, Orange) @ Ultimate �4 ro U `S a25 Maximum Capacity of 17th, -Orange 0 :y Pacific Coast Highway flow 1973 En ; t5 x Orange (between 17th, 14th) @ Ultimate F, � 20 r.r. of 17th, Goldenwest) @ Ultimate--Palm:Max.Cap. Goldenwest (between Orange, Palm) @ -Ultimate o s: (EXAMPLE: Patm at uttimate capacity 441 can buppoht about 1.5000 can.6/day. The o � ` 1848-2587 additionat trip-endz Jnom the • _, � a�sse.6sment d.izt&iet ne newt about 1 50 w lw�,:: o j that capacity) p co15 ----- Palm @ Ultimate E+ Q) �4 t oldenwest (between Palm, Yorktown) , 1973 flow 2587 Trip-Ends per Day 10 1848 Trip Y Ends peg` :?�h ', Goldenwest (between Palm,Orange) &17th (between Dayi; ;c- .,, ,� Palm,Main) ,1973 flow Goldenwest (Orange to PCH) ,1973 flow •� , ?, ` , 17th (PCH to Palm) , 1973 5 Y+' '`.' A}A range (17th to 14t1j, 1973 �; alm & Orange (Goldenwest to 7th) , 1973 20 40 66 80 100 % of Street Traffic Flow for Various Trip-End Generations -88- figures. In all cases , rated capacity is not exceeded. Palm would go to about. 16 percent of capacity, Orange to 13 percent, 17th to 20 percent, and Goldenwest to 14 per- cent of maximum capacity. It is for that reason concluded that an .adverse force is not imparted on traffic circulation. c -89- i ACOUSTICAL QUALITY Noise generated in the assessment district can be expected from three sources : temporary (construction) , mobile (auto- mobile traffic) , and stationary (urban) . Construction noises .can be expected to be of high intensity and short duration. However, the sooner the construction is performed, in terms of stage of development, the fewer persons there will be to perceive the noise, and in many areas distances are great en- ough from habitation so that this noise will not be a problem. Specific attention to construction noise is given in the Construction Section. Noise may be referred to as any unwanted sound. Sound and noise are both measured by the physical unit, decibel (dB) , which expresses logarithmically sound power and pressure in terms of a reference sound power or pressure level . The unit of dB (A) contains a built-in adjustment which equates actual sound pressure to that sound which would be apparent to the human ear. Observed sound or noise has a different capacity for disturbance depending upon intensity, frequency, duration of the noise, and time of day. Sound, since it is a single emission from a source, is attenuated over distance, so that a sound level observed at one distance is proportionately reduced as distance increases. Sound is also attenuated by various atmospheric conditions;. however, none are significant compared to attenuation caused by physical bar- riers. Figure 26. shows various barriers and their effectiveness as applied to freeways . Sound quality is referred to by the -90- HI GHWAY NOISE (MCA, Ljp) AT VARIOUS I HIGWW'AY NOISE !oBA, Lip' AT Vi=�''0US DISTANCES FP.0rl EDGE OF 6-LANE E'GE 0 E 1 TRAFFIC:.S,C�0 VEHIC'-ES PER HCUR, 5S TnL:C:<S.. 1"1,:1H .. ^F: l'�_ V=..,__:3 _i H:-'• _ roVr 0 t3 1:5 0 3�0 erg — -- — L _ - 78 77 74 71 69 "Z0 79 75 72 70 t;C i 7't L �5 74 70 67 LA.'. 73 72 69 66 64 '� - y 65r' ..� _ . 66 64 61 58 1 - //11 s G NOiSF 6 Haye<'_ft 1 /'J 69 6o fJ.?i 61 n MEASUP.ES n� - 63 62. 60 56 5465 65 64 61 55 m ,t "L_:.,.Lit - - i ; :. 10 LEri.C::;D - /,�1 •.1 --73 72 .,• 7a 74 68 65 62 . Figure 26 ATTENUATION OF SOUND BY DISTANCE AND BY USE OF BARRIERS • amount of time a certain level is exceeded. L501 for example , implies that 50 percent of the time the sound pressure level (L) is exceeded.30 Figure 27 shows HUD Acceptability Standards for Proposed Hous- • ing Sites. According to the standard, an average noise level, L501 is normally acceptable up to 60 dB (A) . A level of 56 dB (A) must not be exceeded more than 90 percent of the time. In order ! for the outdoor environment to remain pleasant according to the standard, a level of 45 dB (A) may be exceeded only 50 percent of the time, and only 10 percent of the time may the level of 67 dB (A) be exceeded. No distinction is shown between day and night noise levels. Measurements made in a test community established the graph in Figure 28. The L50 for daytime was 48 dB (A) which were normally acceptable. The night time L50 level is much lower, at about • 38 dB (A) . It is felt that this graph would be indicative of am- bient noise levels within the assessment district, including the sounds of automobiles circulating within the community, only • insofar as both of these communities may be assumed to be aver- age residential communities. Sound generated by automobiles on the streets bordering the assessment district will provide additional noise to the community. Figure 29 shows median sound pressure levels observed at 100 feet distance from automobile traffic at various volumes and speeds. • Hourly volume may be assumed to be vehicle volume per day div- ided by 10. • -92- In.li)'s Acceptability Categories for • Proposed Housing Sites Clearly P.--cept.acle: the noise exposure is such that both the indoor a..: outdoor en- vironments are plus, ant. e the noise expos �r,• • to be of .some (r r cr-rn .,:t. .- morn: hulldinp, cons trIlCLi<m:; will mak•c the indoor environment accept.abl,?, even for sleeplr,i, quarters, and the outdoor environment will be reason.- ably pleasant for recr,�atlon and play. . -al:y Una•:e•-)table: the noise exposure is :;S;;nlficantly more severe so that unununl and costly building constructions are necessary to.ensure soa:^. Indoors, and barriers must ere,ted - • between the site and promir:ent noise sources to make the outdoor environ- ment tolerable. _...,c_c•.table: the noise exposure at the site is so severe that the construction costs to make the indoor environ- ment acceptable would be prohibitive and the outdoor environment would - still be intolernble. 99.9 99.6 99.5 CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE 99 96 . 95 90 0 W 80 W' U w 70 NORMALLY . UNACCEPTABLE W s0 r- SO O 40 NORMALLY ACCEPTABLE 30 20 W (L 10 5 2 . 1.0 0.5 '1E.ARLY ACCFPTABLE 0.2 01 40 60 60 70 80 90 A-LEVEL 08) rd,,t't,tE:, ALTE11a11IVE,FORMAT FOR nuns U1 rF.ltloii r+iR :,, .-„IRCR11'T :IOISE Figure 27 -93- luu 90 80 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM 70 0 w V w 60 w w w� 50 w 1. � • E- 40 I o w 30 !71 w 10:06 1',m w 20 to 7:00 AM a I ' lU 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 A-LEVEL, dB(A) L90 1'50 L10 Figure 28 A-LEVEI. VARIATION DURING DAY AND NIGHTTIME -94- so 70 60 50 A0,00000. 40 AUTOMOBI LES 30 7o - 20 0po I AVERAGE SPEED 0 C 60 000 (MPH) I � a J W > 50 W_ 1 J � W 0 cn Z. 1 � 0 I z 40 Q W 30 20 3 4 5. 6 7 6 100 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1000 2 3 4 5 6 7810,000 2. 3 HOURLY AUTO VOLUME, VA - vph PLOT OF L50 FOR AUTOMOBILES AS FUNCTION OF VOLUME FLOW AND AVERAGE SPEED Fiqure 29 1 • The four streets surrounding the assessment district may be ex- pected to produce noise levels as follows : MPH Present Present Present Present U1t. Ult . avg. Traffic Noise +A.D. +A.D. Traffic Noise Street Speed vol (v/n) dB (A) Traffics dB (A) vol (v/n) dB (A) Goldenwest 46 390 56 680 61 2800 67 • 17th Street 35 320 53 610 57 900 61 Palm Avenue 44 110 46 400 57 1500 64 Orange Ave. 37 120 46 410 56 2000 64 (From Figure 29) 1 . Assessment District flow assumed at 290 vehicles/hour taken from Figure 25. 2. Kimmel study estimates based on current zoning. See Fig. 23. • Applying these figures to Figure 27, it can be seen that all sound levels at ultimate development and that of Goldenwest at its present level plus the full number of vehicles potentially generated by the assessment district are judged as Normally Unacceptable by HUD standards. The presence of a row of dwellings along these streets will have the same effect as a 12 foot wall (i.e. , approximately a 15 dB (A) reduction) , and would reduce noise levels even more as distance increases from the noise source. However, residences loc- ated adjacent to the four major arterials will experience an ad- verse impact (especially along Goldenwest Street) unless proper mitigating measures are undertaken. • • • -96- RECREATION • Neighborhood parks are meant to serve the 2 ,500 to 3 , 500 persons living within one-quarter mile from the facility36 The project populations of the assessment district, Beachwalk, • and Huntington Seacliff constitute about 4 ,700 persons, requiring two 2-to-3 1/2 .acre neighborhood parks in these areas. Although no land has been acquired for this purpose, several sites are planned, as indicated in Figure 30. A ?. 1/2 acre site is planned at location 870 between the assessment district- and .Beachwalk on that map, and a group of parks is planned at location 967 in the Huntington Seacliff development. The critical factor in the placement of parks is the placement of elementary schools. 34 Generally, neigh- borhood parks are planned so that they abut elementary school playgrounds. The reduction in planning and placement of new elementary schools will have a definite effect on the rate at which parks will be placed. Several aspects of open park land are favorable to residential • growth in the assessment district. Within the district lies the two-acre Recreation Center, which provides both in- and out-door facilities. . The 141 acre Huntington Seacliff golf course is well within the quarter-mile distance recommendation. Additionally, the beach (which is all State and city owned in this vicinity) is within one-quarter mile .from the assess- ment district proper. -97- 1..'EST RF.ViS40N DAT£ JAN 1970 • --:I ,— )(r�� sit " �:'; .., � _;, II• '- _ s:' J� ILI"!If c f-•n p o ii :I .all s .. • .`Y1 i� 1- "I 'I ,�••• — C__ — Ir = A�I r 11'�I"II"ili I1S�y��. 'Ip R ro J� �( ! • roe 'I --- , 930 I, 1 ,9s all sas II l! 1 TIs �• � �- r jl i •ir es f sso To II1n II pis „e 1 „ .I :a4 Jl ate I:,. `�IffI i�� y--� IL ? sa li r� I 1l li- plip it Fi gure 30I '''' /`�.�- N• �Il f-11 9/! _li a (".0 PARK LOCATIONS LEGEND135 � I IJ9HIiliw lion- �..�.. 9 J i...+�`\`�f i 9r♦,SI�.�i�!I,r�►.y lip 1 rf +Ci O \�".r'��1 v„ �5A1,�� ez°�,jt!^`�I �1��i•o ICI��, e '^�-� --' ssessmenr� q 6 01 1,�W. Distribt ' ` �I �4,�;"= i4�,J�- II i Y-II A . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH /I ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA / I oq—o— asoo 300o soon / HUIrt1N9,0N BEACH PLANNING DE°AB,NENT -98- I PARK INVENTORY Figure 30 (cont.)' Acres Leased or Acres under joint Acres Park Name I .D. No. Acquired powers Developed Schroeder 700 2.3 2.3 Greer 705 10.3 10.3 Irby 710 11.0 3.0 Murdy Community 715 14.6 14.6 Mardlow, 720 2.3 2.3 Rec. Center 72S 2.0 2.0 Lake 736 4.0 1.8 S.8 Farquhar 73S 3.0 3.0 Hope View 740 3.1 3.1 LeEard 74S . 3.0 2.0 5.0 Perry ISO 2.2 2.2 Gisler 755 1.0 11.0 12.0 Lader 760 2.7 2.7 Hunt. Central 76S .2S0.0 167.0 Oak View. 770 2.S 2.S Hunt. Harbour 77S 2.S Gym 4 Pool 780 .S .5 Sun View 785 2.S 2.5 Chris Carr 790 10.0 10.0 Marina Community 795 9.7 Circle View 800 2.0 2.0 Clegg-Stacy 805 . 3.0 3.0 Harbour View 810 3.S 3.5 Lake View 615 3.0 3.0 College View 820 1.5 ..S 3.0 Bushard 82S 2.S 2.5 Seabridge $30. 3. S 3. 5 Edison Community 835 27.0 13.0 40.0 • Lark View $40 2.9 .5 3.0 Hunt. Community 845 Arevalos 8SO 3.0. 3.0 Springdale 85S 2.0 2.0 Golden View 860 2. 5 Z. S -99- Figure 30 (cont. ) 2/74 Acres Leased or Acres under joint Acres Park Name I .D. No. Acquired powers Developed Pleasant View 865 H.B. Co. 870 Burke 87S 2. 5 2.S Sowers 880 2.5 2.5 SE Adams $ Bush. 88S 2. S Terry 895 2.5 Wellington Mini 900 . S .5 Davenport Mini 905 1.0 1.0 Marine View 910 3.0 3.0 Haven View 915 3.0 3.0 Peterson 920 Robinwood 925 Glen View 930 3.0 3.0 Lambert 935 3. 5 Newland 940 Talbert 945 5.4 5.4 H.B. Co. 950 ti.B. Co. 955 Signal Oil 960 Westmont 965 N.B. Co. 966 H.B. Co. 967 Signal Oil 968 Signal Oil 969 Bartlett 970 ?�•4 Signal Oil 971 j NW Graham 6 Slater 972 York. 8 Del. 973 Del. 6 Ind. 974 SE Graham & Slater 975 SE Adams 6 Beach 976 2.6 Sth $ Main 977 3. S Yorktown Comm. 978 6. 1 Bolsa Chica Co,mn. 979 TOTALS 415. 8 50. 8 . 347. 7 -100- AESTHETICS Several factors have a potential effect on the aesthetic properties of the assessment district - oil production, vacant land , street pattern, building density and type, and landscaping. . The oil production operations in the assessment district present several factors potentially affecting aesthetics. The mere visible presence of wells , pumps , related storage areas and vehicles is , in some subjective measure , aesthet- ically unpleasant. The presence of these factors in proxim- ity to dwelling units not only affects aesthetics in the form of appearance, but in the forms of noise from vehicles and pumps , odors from pumping and storage , and secondary factors of oil leakage and tire tracks. These problems are very difficult to assess, since in many cases in neighbor- ing districts oil .pumps and/or related equipment are situ- ated within a few feet from the actual dwelling unit, with seemingly no negative influence. Excluding the oil-producing portions of the district, vac- ant areas tend to be devoid of natural vegetation and significant topographic variations which might otherwise en- hance natural appearance. However,. the landscaping of existing residential units has provided a slightly favorable relief from these natural deficiencies. In addition, all oil operations along Goldenwest Street are currently screened -101- • from view from the street by trees and shrubbery. The proposed improvements in the form of placement of cul- • de-sacs , sidewalks and curbs, lighting, and landscaping are expected to significantly improve the appearance of the assessment district. The cul-de-sac street pattern will • produce the appearance of an enclosed community, and in con- junction with other improvements will simultaneously permit the developing community to maintain a unique aesthetic character while being compatible with surrounding planned developments. • Approximately 35 , 000 square feet of landscaping will be provided by the assessment district improvements. In addi- tion, 294 trees will be planted along streets and in the • cul-de-sacs. This increase of vegetation will represent a considerable improvement over the present existence of sparsely scattered weeds in the vacant portions of the dis- trict. Although subjective, proposed landscaping improve- ments will probably have a positive impact on aesthetics. There has been a tendency during the past year to construct • residential units of similar but not identical appearance within the assessment district. As indicated in the Land Use section, proposed revision of building setback, recrea- tional space dimension, and parking requirements will increase ground level open space amenity and improve build- ing to site appearance relationships. These trends , along • • -102- with centralization of open space- in larger units in future construction-, could substantially improve the aesthetic appearance of this medium-high density community. • • -103- • CONSTRUCTION • Only the direct impacts of improvement construction will be dealt with in this section. During the construction phase, there will be a wide variety of vehicles proceeding to and from the site carrying both materials and work personnel. These vehicles will cause an increase in traffic, and a potential hazard to pedestrians and children. In addition, the presence of a large number of vehicles will cause significant obstruction to vehicular movement , due to space re- quired for parking and general operation. Any vacant land may be expected to be used for this purpose , as it tends to be now dur- ing dwelling construction. • During the actual construction processes, all of the existing street pavement and curbing must be removed, along with a large quantity of earth being displaced by storm drains and underground utilities. Moreover, preliminary plans indicate that grades in the alleys. will be subtly modified to permit the alleys to collect waters draining from on-site properties. At this time plans do not indi- cate the quantity of asphalt and earthen material to be excavated , or whether there will be a net import or export of such materials. However, it is anticipated that grading in the streets and alleys will be balanced, with no need for importing or exporting fillP All existing street material and base material will be broken up and exported to the County landfill site. Earthen material dis • • -104- placed by drainage and utility installations will be disposed of at the discretion of the contractor, who may deposit it in the " landfill site or sell it to developers. During construction, there will be a short-term potential for erosion of graded street and alley surfaces and excavated trench materials, with a resultant transport of silt to local drainage channels. However, given the anticipated slight modification of such grades and the occurrence of construction in spring and summer, these problems should be minimal. It is anticipated that the depth of trenching for the storm drain trunkline along Orange Avenue will range from 6 feet to. 12 feet. The depth of utility trenches in the streets and alleys will be 30 inches below gutter elevation. Although no test borings ex- ist for the assessment district area, the Huntington Beach Public Works Department has indicated the possible existence of perched groundwater within 15 feet of surface.12 This is based on the . similarity of the Townlot area and the "Old Town" drainage area where test borings indicated the presence of perched groundwater at depths ranging from 2 - 6 feet. Any groundwater dewatering discharges resulting from the proposed project will be disposed through sanitary sewer as per Orange County Sanitation District requirements. A report will also be filed with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Construction activity will contribute effluents to local storm drain systems and will adversely impact the coastal waters of the -105- • Pacific Ocean. Runoff from the assessment district project will . likely contain such pollutants as fertilizers from landscaped areas; construction vehicle hydrocarbons , greases , oil, rubber, . plastics , asbestos , paint, metal fragments and asphalt materials from street pavement; and suspended solids from grading and trenching activities. As indicated in the Paleontology, Archaeology, and Historic Land- marks section, the remote possibility exists that paleontological and archaeological resources could be adversely impacted during improvement construction. Paleontological resources could be en- countered where the surface soil has been disturbed more than five feet or by soil erosion. The greatest probability of this impact is along Orange Avenue where drainage trunkline trenching extends 6 - 12 feet below surface. Archaeological resources, if present, could be encountered in vicinity of the repaved streets, alleys , and drainage trunkline and utility trenching areas. As shown in Figure 13, the assessment district is characterized by numerous abandoned and active oil pipelines located in the streets and alleys. These pipelines range in depth from several. inches of surface to 36 inches. However, the Huntington Beach Oil Field Department indicated that virtually all active pipelines (only active lines are shown on Figure 13) range in depth from 30 - 36 inches.10 Numerous abandoned lines are located within 30 inches of surface. It is anticipated that street pavement and grade modification in the streets and alleys would disturb the soil less than 30 inches of current surface. Consequently, any • -106- oil pipelines encountered would probably be. of the abandoned type and would be removed in the construction process. In the case of drainage trunkline trenching along Orange Avenue and utility under- grounding in the streets and alleys , active oil pipelines will be encountered. Unless proper mitigation and planning measures are undertaken, a potential significant adverse . impact will exist in the. form of oil spillages and costly re-routing of proposed installations and/or oil pipelines. Noise generation may be expected from .both construction equipment and related vehicular traffic. Table 8 shows construction noise sources , dB (A) noise levels , and percent of time the noise is pro- duced. It can be expected that a noise level of about 75 to 80 dB (A) at 100 feet will persist throughout the normal working hours on work days only. According to HUD standards (Figure 27) , this noise level falls within the Clearly Unacceptable range. Only at a distance in excess of 300 feet, or about one block away from the source, does the sound pressure level improve enough to fall within the Normally Acceptable level. During most of the construction phase, movement of earth and ve- hicles will cause the generation of quantities of dust throughout . the construction area. Much of this dust may be settled by the use of water sprays from tank trucks and hoses from fire hydrants, but some will disperse in the air. This may tend to be more of a nuisance, due to particulate fallout, than any potential health hazard. Some reduction in the local air quality due to vehicle exhaust may be expected, although the number of vehicles involved -107- Table 8 • IMMEDIATE ABATEMENT POTENTIAL OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT • Noise Level in dB (A) at 50 ft Important dB (A) Equipment With Feasible Noise Usage ' at Present Noise Control ' Sourcesz 100 ft • Earthmoving front loader 79 75 E C F I H . 4 backhoes 85 75 E C F I H . 16 7 799 dozers 80 75 E C F I H . 4 74 �ra(;Lux-s 80 75 E C F I W , 4 74 • scrapers 88 80 E C F I W .4 82 graders 85 75 E C F I W .o8 79 truck 91 75 E C F I T . 4 85 paver 89 80 E D F I . 1 83 Materials Handl 4lg concrete mixer 85 75 E C F W T .4 79 • concrete pump 82 75 E C H . 4 76 crane 83 75 E C F I T . 16 77 derrick 88 75 E C F I T . 16 82 Stationary pump8 76 75 E C 1 . 0 70 • generators 78 75 E C 1 . 0 72 compressors 81 75 E C H I 1. 0 75 Impact pile drivers 101 . 95 W P E .o4 95 Jack ha mers 88 75 P W E C . 1 82 • rock drills 98 80 W E P M 92 pneumatic tools 86 80 P W E C . 16 80 Other r saws 78 75 `W M 72 vibrator 76 75 W E C .4 70 • Notes: 1. 'Ertimated levels obtainable by selecting quieter procedures or machines and implenentir.c noise control features requiring no major redesign or extreme cost. • 2. In order of importance: T Power Transmission system, F Cooling Fan Gearing C Engine Casing W Tool-Wcrk Interaction E Engine Exhaust H Hydraulics P Pneumatic Exhaust I Engine Intake • 3. Percentage of time equipment is operating at noisiest mode in most used phase on site. • -108-, • in the construction is not expected to be great enough to have • any noticeable effect. The presence of construction operations will cause some reduc- tion in the aesthetic quality of the vista. This becomes less • significant when .the view of construction operations is superim- posed on various oil operations and maintenance and storage areas , and vehicular movements throughout the assessment district. • • • • • • • -109- DISCUSSION MITIGATION MEASURES Geology and Topography 1 . Seismic Impacts: Since the proposed project site is loc- ated within the Newport-Inglewood structural zone , a potential unavoidable adverse impact on proposed improve- . ments will exist. All utilities and the drainage trunkline will be undergrounded. Although not intersecting a fault trace, an earthquake with severe ground shaking would probably produce more damage , and require more costly re- pairs , to underground facilities than to the same facili- . ties located above surface. This will have to be taken . into consideration at least. with respect to the underground . power lines; greater potential seismic damage wi'll: have to be weighed against the aesthetic benefits of utility under- grounding. For new residential developments , appropriate foundation engineering and structural design features should be in- eluded in the preliminary design work based on ground and base rock motion factors roughly estimated in .the Geology and Topography section of this report. It is recommended that the final design of structures consider specific ground motion characteristics , and that a structural engineer ap- prove final project plans . 2 . Land Subsidence: Subsidence problems arising from oil field operations will be - minimized if the current level of water injection into the oil wells of 300 ,000 to 400 ,000 barrels per day is maintained. -110- • 3. Grading: In all grading, water should be used to ensure required compaction, and surfaces should be sloped slightly • so as to direct rainfall runoff toward planned drainages. In the latter category, special attention should be given to sloping graded surfaces in the alleys so that the alleys • collect runoff from adjacent properties . At present, ele- vations in some of the alleys are as high or higher than elevations of adjacent properties, permitting runoff to • collect on the subject properties. 4 . Subsurface Oil Lines: Before grading, a detailed review of all records related to the location of subsurface oil lines • should be made. Where such information is incomplete, a metal detector may be required to locate subsurface facili- ties. Since most active lines range in depth from 30-36 • inches , interference with street repa.vement activities will be minimal. In terms of grading in the streets and alleys , grading should be sufficient to collect runoff where de- • sired, but it should be subtle so as not to disturb active oil pipelines. Knowledge of active pipeline locations and careful routing plans of proposed underground improvements • should mitigate conflicts in this category. Hydrology 1. Erosion/Siltation: Erosion and resultant siltation can be • mitigated by the protection of exposed surfaces. This will be minimized by landscaping, slight grade modifications , siltation basins , and the limitation of grading in sensitive • areas to months when rainfall is light. • -111- 2 . Groundwater Dewatering : Any groundwater dewatering dis- changes will be disposed through sanitary sewer as per Orange County Sanitation District requirements. 3 . Demand on 22nd Street Drainage Line : This will be a* short- term, unavoidable adverse impact unless funds are provided immediately to increase capacity in the 22nd Street line or for the future proposed line on 18th Street or 19th Street to serve the assessment district only. 4 . Decreased Percolation: Decreased percolation as a result. of urbanization will be an unavoidable adverse impact. Water Quality Runoff of contaminants associated with the construction process and subsequent urbanization can be processed in a sewage treat- . ment facility. or contained in retention basins for later use or processing. A siltation structure should be considered for the 22nd Street drainage line or any subsequent lines emptying into the ocean from the assessment district. If the service area of such a drainage line extends beyond the boundaries of the pro- posed assessment district, the cost of the siltation structure should be allocated to all property owners or projects served. J Air Quality 1: Local Air Quality: Air contaminants will be introduced dur- ing the construction process , but this will be a temporary condition (four months) . Dust can be reduced *by applying sufficient water to graded and excavated earthen material. 2 . . Regional Air Quality: This will be an unavoidable adverse -112- • impact from the developer' s standpoint, but is capable of reduction by State emission control legislation on new , • vehicles , improved transportation facilities , and/or car pools. Some small reduction of air emissions might be gained by reduced residential densities in the project area • Flora and Fauna The minimal loss of natural vegetation and displacement of wildlife expected will be an unavoidable impact. In the case of weed removal , the impact will not necessarily be adverse. In- clusion of almost 300 trees and a variety of shrubs in the pro- posed improvements will substantially mitigate the minimal loss • of natural vegetation and may attract additional wildlife to the area. • Archaeology, Paleontology, Historic Landmarks During construction of underground facilities , repavement of streets, and grading processes , a qualified paleontologist and/or • archaeologist, if present on a periodical basis, could readily evaluate any resources should they be exposed. Excavation plans should include a statement permitting such personnel to remove • such resource finds . Land Use 1. Oil-Zoned Parcels : To prevent recommencement of oil produc- • tion on properties with an "O" zoning designation as the district approaches ultimate residential development, the "O" designation should be deleted after initial oil activi- • ties have ceased. • -113- 2 . Increased Residential Densities: There will be beneficial and adverse impacts emanating from this proposal. Incen- tive to property owners to participate in the assessment district, increased city revenues, and increased housing supply will have to be weighed against decreased air, water, and acoustical quality and the increased demands for public utilities and community services. The adverse effects will be unavoidable unless the specific plan is. .altered to re- duce residential densities. 3. Loss of Open Space: Open space in the city will be reduced by 24 . 5 acres as the remainder of the assessment district develops. This loss is largely unavoidable , but is miti- gated by the fact that residential development is in conform- ance with the city' s zoning and general plan. According to the city' s Open Space Element, the assessment district area has minimal value as .conservation open space. Open space provided in future residential developments will slightly mitigate the reduction of total open space. and will be in conformance with the city' s residential open space require- ments. 4 . Inaccessible Lots Along Goldenwest Street: Given the pro- jected unacceptable noise levels for future residences front- ing Goldenwest Street, a six-foot barrier is recommended for installation along that arterial. To prevent an awkward looking and inaccessible residential development along Golden- west Street, it is recommended that the entire area bounded by 2.2nd Street, Palm Avenue, Orange Avenue, and Goldenwest -114-- Street be consolidated and re-designated to allow for only a Planned Residential Development (PRD) . Economics Some property owners may feel that the high assessed improve- ment costs are prohibitive, but costs must be balanced against the economic and amenity benefits they will derive from the pro- ject. The Specific Plan/Assessment District indicated that if desired by the city and property owners , the most feasible ap- proach to reducing the project ' s cost would include elimination of the utility undergrounding and/or the funding of the arterial highways through gas tax and other revenue sources. The average savings per 50-foot parcel would be about $3 , 200 , requiring each. property owner to pay an average of $5 , 560. Public Utilities 1. Energy Demand : As the assessment district develops , there will be an unavoidable increase in demand for water , sani- tary sewer , solid waste , electrical and gas services. At the present , the most critical impact of the proposed pro- ject will be on the consumption of energy. In light of poten- tial power and fuel shortages , specific design and architect- ural considerations for future residential development in the district should be directed at reducing the quantity of energy needed to heat or light the units . 2 . Sanitary Sewer: Liquid waste flows will need to be monitored to determine approaching capacity flow. Huntington Beach Department of Public Works has indicated that before sewer capacity is reached they will install an additional trunk line -115- along Goldenwest Street to pick up the flow contributed by the Huntington. Seacliff development. This intention needs to be formulated into an actual plan. The installation of the new liquid waste trunk line planned for Pacific Coast Highway by the Orange County Sanitation District will re- lieve the impact of .combined waste flows from the several adjacent districts. The impact caused by this assessment district to .the sanitation treatment plant facilities is only a small fraction of the total effect on the plant of growth in .the city. This problem must be dealt with from the county level._ 3. Solid Waste Disposal: In the process of constructing pro- posed assessment district. improvements , unusable materials will be sent to the county solid waste disposal site, while usable materials will be sold to developers. Community Services 1. Education: The increased student demand on local .school districts will be partially mitigated by increased school taxes and revenues from the expected residential developments. 2 . Police .Service: On-site security protection would minimize the increased demand on the Police Department. It is further recommended that all future .residential developments in the area conform with the California Attorney General' s security provisions. Police response time could be decreased by pre- fixing all interior cul-de-sac streets of the assessment district (18th, 19th, 2lst,_ and 22nd Streets) as north or -116- south, but not changing any address numbers. House numbers on individual units should be clearly visible to aid in police identification. 3 . Fire Protection: The Fire Department' s response time and safety element could be improved by eliminating several or all cul-de-sacs. However, this would result in a substan- tial alteration of the proposed project. The benefits of removing any cul-de-sacs would have to be weighed against their intended maintenance. The Fire Department' s response time could also be improved by prefixing all interior cul- de-sac streets of the assessment district as north or south but not changing any address numbers. Traffic Circulation Traffic congestion associated with the construction process will be minimized by its localization within the assessment district and its short duration. The cul-de-sac circulation pattern will be beneficial in discouraging straight-through beach traffic and congestion within the district. The expected increase in residential vehicle population and traffic on the four perimeter arterials can be mitigated to a small measure by increased public ; use of and access to available bus service on existing Orange Countv Transit District routes serving the area. Acoustical Quality To reduce the impact of construction noise , operation of equip- ment should be restricted to normal working hours. Scheduling of equipment usage and implementation of sound deadening devices i -117- on equipment may alleviate much of the unacceptable noise. Since 4 much of the land. still remains vacant, construction of improve- . ments at the earliest possible time will ensure that a large portion of unacceptable noise is attenuated by distance from the source. At ultimate traffic volumes on perimeter arterials, the marginal unacceptability of noise levels received by resi- dences bordering 17th .Street, Palm Avenue, and Orange Avenue could be sufficiently reduced by building insulation and a one- room buffer between bedrooms and traffic noise sources. In order to reduce . unacceptable noise as produced by .ultimate traffic along .Goldenwest Street, a suitable noise barrier, such as a six-foot wall, would be required to lower sound levels to the HUD Normally Acceptable category. A six.-foot barrier along Gold enwest Street would reduce noise levels from the projected 67 dB (A) to- 57 dB (A) . -118- ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION s I. The first alternative is that of taking no action. The implication of such a decision would be as follows : 1. The area occupied by the assessment district will continue to develop at approximately its present rate. At ultimate development, there will be 717 residential units, or 140 units below the proposed density stand- S and revision. The city' s open space will still decrease by 24. 5 acres. Ultimate population will be 1 , 857 , or 363 persons below the population projected by the +� Specific Plan. 2 . Property owners would save between $5,600 and $11 , 000 per 50-foot lot if proposed improvements were not in- stalled as part of an assessment district. However, improvements required to support the expected residen- tial growth will continue to be constructed in a piecemeal and costly . fashion, and real savings would be nonexistent or considerably less than indicated above. 3. Lack of coordination of residential construction and • total street improvements (repair of dilapidated streets and installation of new sidewalks) will pose a safety hazard to persons in the area. r 4 . Traffic circulation will remain unmodified and cross- district beach traffic will continue to produce local congestion, parking, and safety problems. Cross-district -119- traffic would cause possible noise increases and possible safety hazards to pedestrians and children. Without the cul-de-sac plan, the community would not gain an enclosed, planned community appearance. There will be no adverse impact on Police and Fire Depart- ment response times or safety due to extended routes and street blockagq. caused. by the cul-de-sacs. t . 5 . Without the parking. courts and on-site standards re- visions , new residential developments will continue . to find it difficult to. simultaneously provide the required on-site parking and meet open space and yard . requirements. 6 ... Piecemeal development would preclude the underground- ing of utility power. lines. Location of electrical utilities above surface- would- render them less sub- ject to. damage and costly repairs from severe earth- quake ground shaking. At the same time, location of power lines above surface would subtract. from. the area' s aesthetic- appearance. . 7 . Piecemeal installation. of improvements, .such as re pavement of streets and regrading of alleys , would in- crease the p.ossibility.of rupturing subsurface oil lines. 8 . Installation of the Orange Avenue drainage trunkline will be_ postponed indefinitely, thereby increasing local drainage problems and. posing safety and health- hazards to local residents. =120- 9 . Traffic volumes on the district' s streets and re- lated noise and air pollution generation will increase S1 in spite of the project. Due to the expected lower residential densities of the no project alternative, the absolute increase of these parameters will be slightly lower than that generated by the proposed pro- ject. 10. The demand upon public utilities and community ser- vices will increase in spite of the project. Due to the expected lower residential densities of the no project alternative, the absolute increase of these demands will be slightly lower than that generated by the proposed project. 11. Although the assessment district will develop in spite i of the project, generated tax revenues without the project would be lower than generated tax revenues with the project. The lower revenues would reflect the lower expected residential unit densities and the high costs of piecemeal installation of street improvements. II. A second alternative is that of delaying construction of the proposed project until further development occurs. The impacts of such a decision would be as follows : 1. A delay in the project will have all the adverse and positive impacts of the no project alternative. This situation will prevail until the Townlot Specific Plan/ Assessment District is implemented. i -121- 2. The proposed residential standards revisions for parking, open space, and yard requirements will be- come increasingly ineffective as the area develops without the project. The assessment district is now C almost one-third developed. To delay further will mean the construction of more residential units ex- periencing difficulty in meeting parking, open space, and yard requirements ; with fewer potential units re- maining for future inclusion under the development revisions of the Specific Plan. As more residences are constructed with. provision of on-site parking spaces , the utility of the future parking courts would be negated. Since the parking courts are planned to accommodate a large portion of the on-site parking requirement, many residences constructed prior to im- plementation of the proposed project would already . have on-site parking spaces. The result would be an increasingly high excess number of parking spaces for the total assessment district. 3. The total cost of constructing all proposed improve- ments in the assessment district could increase by 12 to 15 percent per year as a result of inflated costs for labor and raw materials. 4 . Inflated construction costs for improvements and the decreasing effectiveness of the density incentive plan as the area develops would serve as disincentives -122- i to property owners to participate in the delayed assessment district formation. III. A third alternative would be to eliminate underground- ing of high voltage power lines. The impacts of such a ' decision would be as follows: 1. The subjectively observed negative aesthetic quality of the existing overhead power lines would be main- , tained. 2 . Location of electrical utilities above surface would render them less subject to damage and costly repairs from severe earthquake ground shaking. 3. Maintenance of power lines above ground would decrease the possibility of rupturing subsurface oil lines. 4 . The cost of the project would be reduced by about 20 percent. Individual property owners would save approxi- mately $1, 600 per 50-foot lot. IV. If the assessment district cannot be established, its planned improvements can still be constructed. The recom- mended specific plan ordinance provisions must be adopted, however, if this is to occur. The end product will be the same if the assessment district is or is not established. Existing traffic problems will be solved, existing parking problems will be remedied, a highly desirable residential environment will be established, and a positive identity for the Townlot Area will still be created. This approach i -123- would, however, require a long period of time for comple- tion and require additional city and private developer funds. The piecemeal development that would occur would no longer provide for a cost efficient project. There is also the possibility that the entire project may not be completed if development does not occur 'on every parcel in the specific plan area. Finally, such an approach would necessitate an inequitable distribution of costs to the various property owners. Those persons developing parcels fronting on a cul-de-sac turnaround or arterial + would be required to spend considerably more money than other property owners while everyone shares equally in the benefits. Equity would probably necessitate a more i modest cul-de-sac treatment and other design revisions. `i • -124- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHORT-TERM USES & LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY The installation of the proposed improvements in the assess- ment district would result in temporary short-term environ- mental effects resulting from the four-month construction pro- cess. However, improvements and subsequent residential construction would supply a short-term increase in the local employment market. Approximately 9 . 5 acres in the assessment district are presently developed and 24 . 5 acres are vacant or in oil production. It is probable that the remaining vacant area will develop, but the proposed improvements and development standards will hasten the process. The change from open space and oil extraction to residential use will represent a long-term land use commit- ment. At the same time , use of the site for residential pur- poses will meet an existing demand for housing in Huntington Beach and the county. With the decline of oil production, residential development will generate tax benefits to the city as discussed in the s Economics section of this report. Residential development stimulated by the proposed project will be in conformance to long-term open space and general land use planning goals for the area. • -125- IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Implementation of the proposed improvements and standards revisions will increase the attractiveness of development of the 24 . 5 acres of open land remaining in the assess- .�. ment `district. This will imply an irreversible shift of land resources from open space and oil production to resi- dential uses. However, according to the city' s open space element, most of the vacant land represents marginal conser- vation open space, and oil production will likely continue until the oil is depleted and/or production becomes econ- omically _unfeasible. Moreover, development of this land is consistent with zoning and land use goals of the Huntington Beach General ..Plan and the district' s specific plan. Another irreversible commitment will be the elevated demand upon energy supplies through the direct and indirect growth- inducing impacts of the project. As with anv construction activity, there will be a commit- ment of construction materials, some of which will represent non-renewable resources. • -126- • GROWTH INDUCING IMPACT Implementation of the proposed project will rate as a signifi- cant contributing factor in the development of the remaining 24. 5 acres of vacant land within the assessment district. Pro- jections based on past trends indicate that ultimate develop- ment of the assessment district can be expected by 1991. However, given the extensive benefits of the proposed improve- ments and the development incentives of the standards revisions • of the Specific Plan, ultimate development of the area will probably occur substantially sooner than 1991. To be sure, other growth inducing factors are operating in the district, ! but none will be as significant as the proposed assessment district and Specific Plan. In addition to stimulating a more rapid rate of growth in the district, the proposed project (density incentive) will per- mit a higher density of development than would occur without the project. At ultimate development, there will be 857 residential units and a population of 2 ,220 . These represent an additional 140 units and 363 persons over the probable expected without the project. Since the density standards of the Specific plan will take precedence over a pending Code Amendment and a General Plan amendment affecting development densities in the Townlot, there will probably be minimal devia- tion from the expected development patterns outlined above. In addition to generating growth within the assessment dist- rict, the approval of the proposed project will likely create • -127- pressure for the development of some of the unimproved lands bordering the district. The primary influence on sur- rounding properties will occur in the undeveloped portion of the Townlot bordered by Orange Avenue, Goldenwest Street, Pacific .Coast Highway, and . Seventeenth Street. Tentatively, if the current Assessment District/Specific Plan is .success- ful , a similar strategy will be applied to the area south of Orange Avenue and west of Seventeenth Street. Moreover, a similar parking court concept will be applied in the rest of the Townlot east of Seventeenth Street. The consequence of these proposals will be to increase the attractiveness of the Townlot as a residential area, and development of most of the remaining open land will be hastened. Another growth-inducing impact which the proposed project will indirectly create relates to the revenues which will be gen- erated by. the subsequent residential development. Through these funds, the city will have additional money to allocate to projects which in themselves will tend to stimulate new growth and expansion. -128- • IMPACT AREA BOUNDARIES Most impacts , direct and indirect, will be confined to the 58 acre area within the assessment district boundaries. During construction, the areas most directly affected by the a project will include the various arterial streets and alleys utilized for proposed improvements, and nearby residential areas within and adjacent to the assessment district. Some adverse impacts could extend beyond the assessment district boundaries in the construction phase. The transport of solid waste materials to the Orange County landfill site will impact the demand in the Orange County service area. Deterioration of air quality will primarily be local , but some minimal impact can be expected in context of the general • South Coast Air Basin. There could be a deterioration of water quality in drainage systems immediately south of the district and coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean as construc- tion related effluents drain from the assessment district. Drainage of water contaminants and any potential rupture of an active oil pipeline (though not considered probable) could impact flora, fauna and human activities in the area .south of the district, and the beach and coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean. After construction, most impacts will occur within the bound- aries of the assessment district. The various environmental features will have their own regional impact boundaries as follows : • -129- 1.. Geological impact area will be the assessment district. 2. Hydrological impact boundaries will include the assess.- - ment district and the general watershed exterior to the district which impacts the 22nd Street drainage line. 3 . Water quality impact boundaries will include the assess- ment district and. the coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean. 4.. Air duality impact boundaries will include the limits of the South Coast Air Basin.. 5. Flora and fauna impact boundaries will include the assess- ment district and the coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean. 6.. Archaeological. and paleontological impacts will be con- fined to the assessment district. 7 . Land•. use impact- area will primarily include the 24 . 5 acres i of vacant and' oil production land- within the assessment district. 8, Demographic impact area will primarily include the 24-. 5 acres of vacant land in the district now zoned for residen- tial developiment. 9. Economic regional impact boundaries .will include the city and. county limits , and the tributary areas of the Hunting- ton Beach Union High School and the Huntington. Beach Ele- mentary School Districts. 10.- Public utility boundaries. are the Huntington Beach Water Supply and Pumping District and the Orange County service areas of the Orange County Sanitation District, Rainbow Dis- posal Company, Southern California Edison Company, and Southern California Gas Company.. . -130- 11. Community service regional boundaries will be the city limits and the Huntington Beach Elementary and High School Districts. 12. Traffic impact will be confined primarily to all streets • within and bordering the assessment district. 13. Noise impact areas will include residential and recrea- tional developments within and adjacent to the assessment • district. 14. Recreation impact boundaries will include the city limits. 15. Aesthetic impact boundaries will be the assessment dis- • trict limits. i • • • • -131- REFERENCES 1. An Area- Inventory, - Huntington Beach, California, Hunting- ton Beach Economic• Development Department, 1973 . 2. Annual Report for 1973 , Huntington Beach Water Department, 1974. 3. Beranek, Leo, ed. , Noise and Vibration Control, New York: McGraw-,Hill*, . 1971. 4. Bolt, Beranek, and ' Newman, Report No. 2000R. 5. Borwich; ..Gene, Huntington Beach Police . Department, telephone conversation, . May 3.0 , 1974". 6. Circulation and.- Transportation Study Parameters , Huntington Beach Planning Depar_tmen:t-, : September 1973 . . 7 . Compilation of Air:- Pollutant Emission..Factor.s , AP-4 2 , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency., Office of Air and Water Programs, . Apri.l 1.97 3. 8 . Compton, . William, District Manager., Southern California Edison Company; telephone- conversation. 9. Conservation: Technical Report-, Huntington Beach Planning Department-, March 1974 : 10. Davis, Robert, Oil Field- Inspector, Huntington Beach Building Department:, personal communication, December 10, 1974 . 11 Day, - Herb, Oil Field Superintendent , Huntington Beach Build— ing Department, persona-l. communication, June 26, 1974 . 12 . . Doolittle, Richard, Engineering Aide , Huntington Beach De- partment -of Public ,Works, personal communications , April 24 ,. 1974 , and October 15., 1974 .. 13. . Dysinger., G1en, . Huntington Beach Union High School District , telephone conversation, May 24 , 1974. 14 . Environmental. Impact Report No. 73-15 (TT 5483) Houghton Bay, prepared . for the .City of Huntington Beach by Environmental Impact Profiles , August_ 13 1973. 1.5. Environmental Impact Report- No. 73-19 , Sunset Heights Assess- ment District No.: 72-01 prepared for- the City of Huntington Be ach` by: Environmental Impact Reports , Inc. , August 161 1973. -132- • 16. Environmental Impact Report No. 73-23 , "Old Town" Drainage Assessment District No. 73-02 , Huntington Beach Department ! of Environmental Resources , September 20 , 1974 . 17 . Environmental Impact Report No. 74-1 (ZC 74-1) Brock Prop- erty, ZC C4 to PRD-R2 , prepared for the City of Huntington Beach by Westec Services, Inc. , April 26 , 1974. 18 . Environmental Impact Report No. 74-2 , Gothard Street: A Proposed Widening and Realignment Project, prepared for the City of Huntington Beach by Environmental Impact Pro- files, June 12 , 1974. 19. Environmental Impact Report, Improved Treatment at Sanita- • tion Plant No. 2 , prepared for the Orange County Sanitation District by Richard Terry, March 1974. 20. Environmental Impact Statement, Orange County Flood Control District, Huntington Beach Storm Drain, Facility No. D01P05 , Reynolds and Associates , September 1972 . 21. Fernandez , Rudy, Engineer, Orange County Refuse Engineering Department, telephone conversation, May 13, 1974 . 22 . Flood Hazard Study, Huntington Beach Planning Department, April 1974. 23. Ford, Jay, Huntington Beach Department of Public Works , telephone conversation, May 8 , 1974. 24 . Geotechnical Inputs, prepared for the City of Huntington Beach by Leighton-Yen and Associates, February 1974. 25. Growth Policy Study, Huntington Beach Planning Department, October 1973, revised March 1974 . 26. Haskin, Leslie S. , Wild Flowers of the Pacific Coast, Port- land: Binfords and Mort , 1967 . 27 . Hermann, Matthias, Wild Flowers, New York: Gallahad Books, 1973. 28. Huntington Beach Elementary School District, telephone con- versation, May 13, 1974 . 29. Huntington Beach Industrial Park Traffic Study, Herman Kimmel and Associates , Inc. , April 1974. 30. Jackson, Jeremiah, Environmental Engineer, Huntington Beach Harbors and Beaches Department, personal communications , April 10, 1974 , May 8-10, 1974. -133- 31. Land Use Element., Phase. I , Huntington Beach Planning De- partment , November 197-3. 32. Ludwig,_ . Walter, Manager, California Department of Motor Vehicles , telephone conversation,- April 25., 1974.. 33. Monthly Records from 1965 through 1973, Huntington Beach Building Department, 19.65-1973.. 34 . Moseley; Tom, Administrative: Aide, Huntington Beach Rec- rea.tion. and Parks Department, telephone conversation.,. June 17 , 19-7 4.. ! 35: Mullen, Ted:, Huntington-. Beach Department of Public Works , letter. of October. 4 , 197.3 to file. via Ralph Leyva, Hunting- ton Beach Traffic_ Division-..: 36. Open Space and. Conservation Element,. Phase- I , Huntington Beach Planning. Department, November 1973 . 37•. Revenue/Expenditures. Analysis of: Land Uses, Huntington Beach Planning Department-,. October 1973. . 38 . Scientific Resources Survey. and Inventory, prepared for the City of Huntington Beach: byArchaeological Research, Inc. , January 197.3.. 3.9 . Sewer Design Criteria,. Huntington Beach Public Works Depart- ment, April 19'7-4•., 40.- Special Census of: Hunting.ton: Beach,. California, State Depart- ment of Finance, November 1973. 41... Town-lot-. Specific Plan/.Assessment District, Huntington Beach Planning Department, August 1973. . 42. Townlot Specific Plan. Study, Huntington Beach Planning De- partment.,. August 19.73 . . 43. Traczyk,. Stanley,. General Manager, Rainbow Disposal ,_Company, telephone conversation. 44 . Traffic Generation Characteristic Report , Huntington Beach Planning. Department, May; 1.97-3.. 45 . Traffic Information. Summary, Huntington Beach Department of Public Works , January 1974 . 46. ' Vanderlaan;. Andy,. Deputy- Fire Marshal , Huntington Beach Fire Department , personal communication, June 11, 1974 . -134- • 47 . Water Pollution Aspects of Street Surface Contaminants , EPA-R2-72-081, U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Monitoring, November 1972 . 48. Witcher, Bruce, Engineer, Orange County Sanitation District, ' telephone conversation, May 13, 1974 . • • • • S • -135 APPENDIX A • RECOMMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE 1. 0 The recommendations in the preceeding sections of this report have been consolidated in this Appendix into a. Specific Plan Ordinance. The intention of this section is to- indicate the components of the • Specific Plan necessary to achieve the goals elsewhere identified. The ordinance format will clearly delineate those sections of the City' s Land .Use Ordinance that must be revised for the Townlot • Specific-Plan/Assessment District. The following then becomes the special regulations applicable to this area. • 1.1 INTENT AND PURPOSE The intent -and purpose of this Specific Plan is to establish a specific plan to guide the -orderly development and improvement • of .that area of the City that .is .identified as the Townlot Assess- ment District. This Specific Plan is directly related to the accomplishment of lthe objectives of the Assessment District and • delineates policy changes that are necessary to transform the Assessment District into. an optimum residential environment for both the resident and developer. . • 1. 2 SPECIFIC PLAN. BOUNDARIES The following property shall be included in the Townlot Specific • Plan/Assessment District and shall be subject to the following development standards and policies : generally , the area bounded by Goldenwest Street, _Palm Avenue., Orange Avenue, and 1.7th Street . • --136- APPENDIX A Precisely, the Specific Plan area includes the real property described as : Block. 417 , lots 1-28; Block 420,' lots 1-28 ; Block 421 , lots 1-28 ; Block 422 , lots 1.-28 ; }dock 517, lots 1- 28 ; Block 518 , lots 1-28 ; Block 519 , lots 1-28 ; Block 520 , lots 1.-28 ; Block 521 , lots 1-28 ; • Block 522 , lots 1-28 ; Block 617 , lots 1-28 ; Block 618 , lots 1-28 ; Block 619, lots 1-28; Block 620 , lots 1-28 ; Block 621 , lots 1-28; Block 622 , lots 1-28; Seventeenth Street Section as recorded in • miscellaneous maps of Orange County, Book 4 , Page 10 . In addition, all public right of way within the Townlot Assessment District is included. • 1 . 3 PRIVATE LAND DEVELOPMENT The following general land use designations are established : • 1 . Medium High Density Residential 2 . Recreation Center The designation, locations, and boundaries', of these uses are de- lineated upon the plan entitled "Townlot Specific Plan/Assessment . District" . The above general land use classifications generally correspond to the land use designations included in the Land Use Element of the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. Whever a building or structure is erected, reconstructed, or structurally altered in the Specific Plan Area, all applicable Sections of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code shall prevail , except where there is conflict with the provisions of this plan, in which case, the provisions of this specific plan shall take • precedence. Further, no building permit or other city granted entitlement shall be issued unless the property owner agrees to and complies with the provisions of this specific plan and other applicable City standards. -137- APPENDIX A 1. 4 PUBLIC RIGHTS--OF-WAY . All improvements to be conducted in the public right of way shall be constructed to conform to the final plans proposed for the Townlot Assessment District. Said improvements are described in the accompanying plans and. text, entitled "Townlot Assessment District" . (Note: plans and text generally conform to Section 6 . 0 of this study. The text and plans are not included to avoid undue repitition, however, any ordinance should include this . description.. 1. 5 TOWNLOT SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS It is the intent of the following to provide development standards that reasonably relate the parcel size to the intensity of resi- dential development; solve existing parking problems; establish proper building bulk: and parcel size relationships, and generally implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach. 1. 5.1 USES PERMITTED - MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Single family dwellings, duplexes, triplexes, other multiple dwelling structures, multiple dwelling groupings , and the cus- tomary accessory uses .and structures. No tent, mobile home , trailer vehicle, or temporary structure shall be used for dwelling or sleeping purposes. USES PERMITTED - RECREATION CENTER Multi-purpose recreational facilities designed to serve general or specific needs of the community .. -138- • APPENDIX A 1. 53 DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS Because most possible lot combinations for the Townlot Specific Plan area can be anticipated, it is possible to determine optimum density, maximum floor area, maximum lot coverage, minimum liva- bility space, and minimum recreation space for those parcel com- binations . These development intensity standards are therefore presented in the following table, entitled Development Intensity Standards. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS Number Maximum Number Maximum Maximum Mi.nimn Minimum of Lots of Units Floor Area Lot Coverage Livability Recreation (square feet) (sq. ft.) Space Space (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) • 1 1 1,650 1,146 627 214 2 3 3,259 3,036 591 391 3 6 6,456 3,228 1,469 784 4 9 8,702 4,351 1,882 1,028 5 11 10,896 5,448 2,352 1,284 6 12 12,177. 6,125 3,104 1,461 7 13 13,253 7,672 3,778 1,590 8 14 14,157 8,934 4,657 1,894 9 15 15,926 10,051 5,293 2,070 10 16 16,500 11,550 6,275 2,145 11 18 18,150 12,705 6,903 2,360 12 19 19,800 13,860 7,503 2,574 13 21 21,449 15,01.7 8,212 2,788 14 30 30,124 15,062 6,854 3,660 28 60 60,226 30,113 13,708 7,318 • -139- APPENDIX A 1 ..5.4 FLOUR AREA • For the purposes of .t.his ordinance, floor area shall be the area of the several floors of a structure or structures as measured from the exterior faces of the exterior walls , or from the center- line of walls separating two buildings . . All stairways, balconies, and corridors are included as part of floor area. Attic areas with head room less than seven (7) feet, and parking garages • or structures are not included as part of floor area. 1. 55 LOT COVERAGE For- the purposes of. this ordinance, lot coverage shall be the area of the lot covered by roofed structures, as measured from the exterior faces of the exterior walls or from the centerline of walls - separating two buildings . All stairways, balconies, covered patios, and interior corridors shall be included. Areas of the lot covered by parking garages or structures are not included. 1.5.6 LIVABILITY -SPACE For the purposes of this ordinance, livability space shall be the parcel or lot area less the building coverage and minus the area of the lot devoted to parking garages or. structures and uncovered car areas 1. 5.7. RECREATION SPACt For the purposes of '- this ordinance, recreation space shall include • that portion of the livability space devoted exclusively to passive and active recreation areas or facilities . With exception of the single family residence, all recreation areas shall have a minimum -140- • APPENDIX A dimension of 20 feet horizontally from any residential window on the ground Lloo�r . • 1. 5.8 PARKING (1) Each bachelor, single, or one-bedroom unit shall be provided one parking space . (2) Each two-bedroom dwelling unit shall be provided with 1�, parking spaces. (3) Each three or more bedroom dwelling unit shall be provided with two parking spaces. (4) Each dwelling unit shall be provided with � guest parking • space. (5) Each dwelling unit shall have a minimum of one covered parking space located on-site. All other required parking may be provided off-site in the parking courts or parking areas provided by the Townlot Assessment District improvements of the subject parking is adjacent to and accessible to the • affected dwelling units . (6) If the subject parcel is a minimum of 28 lots or 1 . 8 acres in area, all parking shall be provided on site. • (7) No boat, recreational vehicle, or inoperative automobile may be parked or stored in any parking court or area provided by the Assessment District improvements. • (8) If the above situation does occur, the vehicle shall be removed at the owner ' s expense . (9) Specified and regular periods shall be established whereby • parking in the parking courts or areas shall be prohibited to allow sweeping of these areas and other maintenance operations as necessary. -141- APPENDIX A 1. 5,9 SETBACKS . (1) Front Yard: The front yard setback shall be a minimum of ten feet as measured from the property line for one and two story structures. Where the above requirement has extended for more than fifty feet of lot frontage, the next fifty feet of frontage shall have a minimum setback of 12? feet. (2) Rear Yard: Rear yards. shall have a minimum setback of 20 . feet as measured from the center line of the alley, except where the front yard setback is 12� feet, then the .minimum rear yard . setback shall. be 171� feet from the alley center line. (3) Side Yard: The setbacks of both side yards shall be 15 percent of the lot width. Said setbacks may be allocated as desired subject to the following: (a) A minimum side yard of five feet must be provided on either side yard except that the setback may be re- duced to zero for 50 percent of the building length facing either side yard. If zero side yard is used, it must be contained within the rear 75 percent of the lot depth. (b) The amount of side yard area lost by this procedure must be made up elsewhere in either side yard . (c) Side yards fronting on an arterial street shall maintain a minimum setback of five feet . • 1. 6 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW . All uses in the Townlot Specific Plan/Assessment District Area shall . be subject to approval of an administrative review application -142- • APPENDIX A before the Board of Zoning Adjustments unless a use permit application is required. The following criteria shall serve as guidelines for the board in approving, conditionally approving, or denying such application: (a) Relationship of the structure to the site. (b) Relationship of the structure to the surroundings . (c) Relationship of the livability space and recreation space to the dwelling units . (d) Relationship of parking and vehicular circulation areas. • (e) Compliance with provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code. (f) Compliance with provisions of the Townlot Specific Plan. • • • • • -143- APPENDIX B BICYCLE SAFETY REPORT COUNCIL ON RECORD I!1 5VPVW OF SINS sr'gMam Or "Fay LAWS - (CA 73-91) d:t^l.etrernr presented a report aid statistics regarding 00 palics Depart- c b:rycie safety enforcement program. Councilman Green spoke regarding the importaaaa of strict enfoeaa>sssit of bicycle safety laws and discussion was held by Council an the matter. A motion was made by Councilman Grassi, that Cousicll go 00 record ce fully supporting strong enforcement of the City's bicycle safety law. Police Chief Robitaille reported oaths police Department's efforts to promote bicycle safety. Councilman Duke suggested an-amendment to Councilman Green's Wtiaa that consideration be given to having the schools and City male a joint leffort to require that children riding bicycles to school be required to attend bicycle safety elaasas. The motion made by Councilman Green including the ■medMmt as wtWted by Couseilmas Duke. vas passed by the following vote: AtIS: Councilmen:. Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Duke, Ustmay NDO: Councilmen: None Alam Councilmen: .Shipley, Coen AUIBOQIZATION TO Pa0C85D WITH POMWION Of '''^'tun U)T ASSAIMME DIl'itILZ J73-01 - APPRaM The City Administrator reported.on a proposal to create an assessment district to the area lying between 17th Street and Goldenwest Street and between orange and Palm Avenues. Be informed Council that it we his recommendation that. the Acting Director of public Works be directed to procee&with-the formation of the district; to proceed with .the preparation oC p.lans'and specifications., and authorise the ssgloywent of special counsel therefor. Page I10 - Council Minutes - 8/20/73 The Acting: Director of Public Works "reported o;, n pvcty of the proposed ,u,r+.•Namenl district and stated that an Environmental 1mpa, t Report would be required, as.well as permission from the Coastal Commission. Discussion was hold by Council regarding the matter. On motion by Green, Council authorised the-Acting Director of Public Works to proceed with the formation of the district; to proceed with" the preparation of plans and specifications, and authorize the employment of special counsel. The motion was.passed by the following vote: " AYES: Councilmen: Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Duke, Matney NOES:" Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: Shipley, Coen • POLICY PLAN - CITIZEN'S GOALS 6 OBJBCTIYBS C0 MTTEE The City Administrator-reported that pursuant to Council direction, a meeting had been held between the staff, Planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce, Environmental Council and the Citimen's Goals and Objectives Comittee for the purpose of reviewing the various sections of the Policy Plan. He stated that he believed it was the consensus of all parties that the recommendations of the Committee should not be an integral part of the City's general plan, but should be considered as concepts and ideals which the. City should strive toward but which, in many instances would not necessarily be obtainable. He informed Council that a resolution had been prepared —144— APPENDIX B RESOLUTION NO. 3838 • RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MAP ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 73-01 TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, State of California, in regular session assembled, that the proposed boundaries of the assessment district proposed to be assessed in this assessment proceeding to pay any part of the cost of the proposed improvement in this assessment district are as shown upon a map of the assessment district now on file in the office of • the City Clerk of the said City of Huntington Beach, and entitled "PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF TOWN LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, ASSESSMENT %STRICT NUMBER 73-01, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA" , and which map indicates by a boundary line th,f extent of the territory included in this assessment district . Said plat or map is hereby adopted as the plat or map describing the • extent of the territory to be included in this proposed assessment district . The City Clerk of said City of Huntington Beach is hereby ordered and directed to endorse upon the original and at least one copy of said map her certificate evidencing the date and adoption of this resolution. Thereafter, said Clerk shall file the original. .-�f Said map as so endorsed in said Clerk' s office , and shall. forth- with Lhereafter file a copy of said map executed as hereinbef'orrr .directed with the County Recorder of Grange County , California . • ADOPTED the 4th day of February 1974 . ayor ATTEST: City Clerk —7dS— PLANNING Z LNG tsri i;ivuin u . 9-6-11 a SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 10-6-11 NOTE CITYOF ADOPTED MARCH T. 1N0 ::.1,qr u.•,..w :; .• CITY COUNCIL OFIDIMANCI MO te1 1.E�E NII.V H LrITINGTON BEACH Aru!ucu n110 Mo E CH ,.7-,t N. 7.T t1 1T10 1t-.-.t .t. 7-7t 1711 �.,,aar...r :r. .. I'll-N „t 1- 7t 17,2 LT URA.r 9•D-e7 1tN 2t-7i 17I! .$fl...-.a'• - t-17-0 Nl, !-t.tt ITN a• -r•:re• +r :w.,.. -- . ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA q-1• A µ« 1-7 - e-e-11 iN! :-7-7t inE s:u.1. T[pt rp AMENDED"87 ZONE CASE 1-3-72 1707 ,-e-Tt rr4, 1.0j_11-w7 -c. ... 23A.2„I97.lEe.a.I,.9au.70..0,71-01•39.7,31CL t1•,IQ7,-,TZ1,71-t1b471-,�71-]gt71-!ILIA . - 6-e-ft 17q l� corl.Mt 1,:!IN1,7i (, ti'µl•1 .,.•o f ..a.n. . \'0 t-17-77 M! 9o,.,Uo .-,•a• WT o•., !1 1. 1 fa OM ...pQN•v( n.A•.a,.,+ � ,,y. sr o• sT �'�'01 ,/ �' -' to: COMI•,TU w.,d�w1a0U[rv. �. M2-01 a F;I-0 R 4-0 ph _ Q, y M 2-02 oil \ # y ? Q^ P Pry . .o . ♦ fi Pam' C,. fp Q' 1 �C P C/ ' �yt f. ? k f o -� C, C, F <ti . i 1 -146- APPENDIX B STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) • I ALICIA WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified and City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify. that the whole number • of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of • . said City Council at a regular meeting hereof held on the 4th day of February, 1974, by the following vote: AYES; COUNCILMEN • Shipley,Bartlett Gibbs, Green Duke Matney NOES: COUNCILMEN • None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN • Coen City �Clerk • By • • -147- APPENDIX C CITY OF Mm" GO ON ENUMM INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION To File- via Ralph Leyva From Ted Mullen Subject Town Lot Area Date October 4, 1973 A. Adequacy of Existing Sewage System for Proposed Development All streets between and parallel with 23rd Street (Goldenwest) and Main Street, have sewers in the alleys between' them. These- are 8" dia. and are adequate for the ultimate development of the Huntington Seaclitf Area and_ also of 15,000 + population town lot .area. The trunkline that picks _up all of these 8" mains that run toward the ocean is 16" @ .16% and is OK to 3.0 efs. (15,000 people 2.73 cfs. using peaking factor (safety factor) of 2. Im-creasing the size (and capacity) of the Ocean Avenue Trunk which belongs to County Sanitation District 11 has been planned due to the prospect of bringing the .,BolsaLaguna/?T?88rVac.) into the District. They plan to pump up the Bluff and sewer through this new trunk ,(See Keith and Assoc. Report to County Sanitation District 11, 2-17-72). This increase would probably be done prior to the ultimate development of the townlot area or the Huntington Seacliff. B. Adequacy of Water_System The water division feels that the existing system would be adequate for the zoning as it had been a couple-of years ago but if any type of high rise and/or higher density use is proposed; that intersecting 8" mains will be required; down Acacia, Magnolia, Olive and Walnut .from Goldeuwest to Lake Street. Also the 16" in Goldenwest. must be completed and a 12" in Pacif1c Coast Highway. Ted. Mullett TMsel -148- APPENDIX C • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECFJVF_0 INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION N.Ov 1 A973 HUNTINGTON BEACH p1 ANNING DEPT• • To From Carol Schwartz H. E. Hartge Subject Date • Townlot Assessment November 6, 1973 District No. 7301 In reference to your memo of October 24 , 1973 , • the following work will be included in the subject Assessment District: 1. Removal of existing street improvements 2 . Street paving 3. Landscaping • 4 . Curb, gutter and sidewalk 5. Street lighting 6 . Undergrounding of utilities including high voltage lines along Palm. 7. Storm drain. 8 . Sewer house laterals 9 . Water services • H. E. Hartge Acting Director of Public Work and City Engineer • HEH:WEH:el • • -149- APPENDIX C • EnVIROf IMEf 1TAL REVIEW BOARD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH•CALIFORNIA .�" • P.O. BOX 190 926" IIUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 10, 1974 Orange County Air .Pollution Control District P. O. Box 190 1010 South Harbor Huntington Beach; Calif. 92648 Anaheim, California Dear. Sir, The Environmental Resources Depaitment of the City of Huntington Beach is currently involved in the preparation of a draft environ- mental impact report on the proposed Townlot Assessment District No. . 73-01. Pursuant to Section 15085 (b) of the December 17, 1973 Amended Guidelines for the . California Environmental Quality Act, the lead agency is directed to consult with during the time of the re ara- tion of the draft EIR, any person or organization it believes will be concerned with the environmental effects of the project. Briefly, the project involves installation of street and utility improvements in the partially developed Assessment District 73-01. The following will be included: 1. Street paving and installation of curbs, gutters, and side- walks, with removal of existing street improvements. 2. Undergrounding of utilities, including high voltage lines along Palm. 3. Storm drains. 4. Landscaping and street lighting. The project is intended to correct the problem of piecemeal installation of facilities due to random development and promote desirable development of the remaining area by efficient, planned installation of streets and utilities. Present installation includes narrow dilapidated paving, and fully installed fresh water and sewer system. About 10% of the district is already developed. It is expected that growth in the district may be induced by this project with potential effects on traffic circu- lation, air, land, and water quality, schools, commerce, and public facilities. Two maps indicating the project boundaries and location within the City proper are attached.. -150- • APPENDIX C If you have concerns or problems to which we should be alerted in regard to the EIR on this project, please write to me at the above address or call Mr. John Miller at (714) 536-5279 or myself • (714) 536-5473 by April 24 , 1974 . Your cooperation in helping to make the draft EIR as complete as possible is appreciated. Cordially, NUNTINGTON BEACH Carol Schwartz PLANNING DEPARTMENT Associate Planner CS:mc APR 1�;; 191 • P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 7 7 • l� • • • • • =151- APPENDIX C CITY OF, HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION u tinaaut�etnt t To Jack Miller From Carol Schwartz Subject EIR on Townlot Assessment Date April 18, 1974 • District Bob Josephs of the South Coast Regional Coastal Commission called today regarding your letter requesting comments. • The Coastal Commission' s main concerns are: 1. Will there be sufficient public services and facilities to fulfill the increased rate of growth which may result from the A.D.? . 2. In the above context, he mentioned specifically open space for residents of the area and voltage lines. 3. The EIR should indicate the status of a specific or (precise) plan for the area. The city has been talking • about cul-de-sacing some of the streets, but you should check into the status of this with Ed Selich. In one sense, the Commission is not very concerned if the A.D. will increase the rate of development; they are concerned, however, with the effects of the growth inducing effects of the project. (In terms o t e EIR, the inducing of growth is a direct effect, and the effects of that growth encouragement are indirect or secondary effects. Under the CEQA guidelines, the EIR should cover both direct and indirect effects. ) The Commission, in its planning work, is beginning to think in terms of areas along the coastline which should have lower density and areas which should have higher densities. The townlot area is being thought of as a higher density area; they are interested in understanding both the impact on city services, and how the higher growth rate (particularly the traffic) will impact on county use of the Huntington Beach beaches and Pacific Coast Highway. • -152- APPENDIX C Toy Carol Schwartz Fromm EIR Review Committee of the Environmental Council Date, April 29, 1974 Topics Suggested comments on Townlot Assessment District EIR The EIR Review Committee has discussed some aspects of the Townlot area, and is desirous that the following topics be discussed: 1. Storm water is a problem in the area, and the plan for sotrm drains should be discussed, as well as the plan for the final "disposal" of the runoff. (In other parts of the coastline, • such as downtown, runoff passes through a grate onto the sand on the local beach. ) 2. The issue of sewage lines anf treatment facilities--mainly lines and trunk line capacity--needs careful discussion. At ERB meetings there have been conflicting reports regarding this Issue. �. The entire Townlot area seems to be deficient of public neighborhood parks . The issue of park feasibility, and suggestions for park fee use (if there even is such with Individual owners of small properties ) should also be discussed. 4. While the code amendment for apartment standards, and that for residential lot size increase have not yet been passed, the development in this Townlot section sho!;ld discuss these possible changes in density, and the impact on the proposed assessment district. The issue of growth inducement from. such a project is certainly important also. 5. Regarding the landscaping to be installed--it is hopeful that the landscaping will provide a character for the area that is fast becoming a patchwork quilt of architectural and landscaping motifs. b. Carefully consider the lighting plan, considering the municipal energy consumption. Former spacing of. lights may not be a valid justification fox, the present improved quality lighting, though the need of lights for safety in this area especially Is deemed very important. • -153- APPENDIX D Minutes, Environmental .Review Board July 23, 1974 = Page 10 be a water course to be maintained; and 3.6 .- there will be a new water line of 800' of 8" line on Delaware .and 400' of 4" line on Florida, to replace a presently existing line on the property. Applicant has met with staff and worked out methods of locating the structure and relocating the water line to the Board's satisfaction. The Board also discussed landscaping and energy sources for the pro- ject. Dave Eadie made a motion that the Board grant tentative approval to this request, , post it for the 10-day public input period, and issue a Negative Declaration for. the project, having found that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment. No environmental impact report has been pre- pared for this project; findings are based upon information contained within the amended environmental document. The motion . carries the following recommendation and stipulation: 1. This tentative approval is predicated upon the agreement of the developer to relocate the water main as discussed with staff. 2. If the developer proposes to provide air conditioning, the insulation in the exterior ceilings should be a minimum of R-19 and that in the exterior walls should be a minimum of R-11; if no air conditioning is to be provided, the insula- `7Y tion in the exterior ceilings should be a minimum of R-13 . and that .in the exterior walls should be a minimum of R-7. . Motion seconded by Jim Palin; motion car- ried by vote of all four members present. EIRs: s, a. EIR 74-7 (Townlot Assessment District 73-01) At Jim a i uacy for posting of this EIR was continued. b. EIR 74-4 4C 74-5 - Signal-Bolsa Project) Responses were received from Envista, Ultrasystems, and Envir- onmental Impact Profiles for the preparation of the impact report on this project. It was the consensus of the Board that Ultrasystems had submitted the most comprehensive proposal. Jerry Jackson noted that he felt the proposal from Ultrasys= tems was superior particularly in its attention to the water -154- ORDER OF PROCEDURE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) DATE OF MEETING: April 21, 1975 - 7: 30 PM CITY COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING HEAR- ING PROCEDURE. ENGINEER: Present map showing proposed works of improvement and boundaries of assessment district. MAYOR AND COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION ADOPTING PLAT. MAYOR AND COUNCIL: Adopt RESOLUTION COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION. (Public Hearing Date: May 19 , 1975) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE OF HEARING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows: That the undersigned is now, and at all times herein men- tioned was, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California. That on the aLdday of , 1975, said clerk caused to be mailed NOTICES OF HEARING,' a 4fopy of which Notice is annexed hereto and made a part hereof to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the proposed improvement, accord- ing to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appear upon the last equalized assessment roll for city taxes, prior to the date of such mailing, or as known to the undersigned. Said mailing was caused at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for hearing as set forth in said Notice. EXECUTED on the �.h day of , . 1975. APPROVED AS TO FORM. DON P. BONFA City Attorney CITY CLERIC 0 HE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deputy City Attorney -- 1. NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN , that on the 21st day of A ril , 19 75 , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, approved and adopted a Resolution providing for a hearing as set forth in Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that the City Council of . the City of Huntington Beach, California, on the 21st day of April , 19 75 , did adopt 'a Plat entitled, "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) " showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed construction of certain public street improvements including street and landscaping improvements as well as necessary acquisitions, and also on said date by resolution, adopted a map show- ing the boundaries of the district benefited thereby. That on said date the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach did adopt a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination that the public convenience and necessity require the construction of certain street improvements and landscaping including street and right of way acquisition together with appurtenances and appurtenant work- within the City of Huntington Beach, California, and that the cost and expense thereof is to be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby in the City of Huntington Beach. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that Monday, the 19th day of May, _ 1975 , at the hour of 7 :00 PM o ' clock in the Council Chambers of the City Council 'of the ,City of Huntington Beach, .located at 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, is the day, hour and place fixed for a public hearing upon the public convenience and necessity for the above mentioned and referenced improvement and acquisition without compliance with the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act' of 1931 . " Any persons interested in,Ior owning , property within the district proposed to be assessed .to pay the cost and expenses thereof, may file with the City Clerk, prior to the time fixed for hearing, wr.i-tten protests or objections to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying to the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation , Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931. ". All protests or objections shall contain a description of the property, the nature of the protest or objection, and bear the signature of the interested person or owner. The improvements and work shall be conducted under the pro- visions of the "Improvement Act of 1911 being Division. 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of- the State of California and. bonds will .also be issued pursuant to the provisions of said Act. Reference is hereby made to Resolution No. 4067 and to the plat' and map on file in the office of the City Clerk for all particulars . The following is a general description of the works of improve- ment proposed to be constructed under these_ proceedings: y 1 A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal , and the installation of curbs , gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches , paving , street lights , drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST, easterly of center line, Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from Goldenwest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue . B. The construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418 , 419 , 420 , 421, 422 , 517 , 518 , 519 , 520, 521 , 522 , 617 , 618 , 619 , 620 , 621 , and 622 , all of the Huntington Beach. Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars , reference is. hereby made to the map attached hereto .showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. DATED: ,3O APPR0A0, Ol$ TG FQM-- Dbh V. �(691'Q n TY CLERK H OF dt%V Attort ay HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA Deputy City Attorney 41LI 01 i l i l j l i I III I 'l l l l III, III I 1 � _ - °•r"•' T:' it TI j I1 IrTT1'I IYI iT'•: -- illllll1111.U.I- LwjLj.LL1Ch I I I I I ► I I l i ► iI I I cc cc r- - I � II � II'Till t +� m M61 I I I I i' I i i I I I' . I I i I I ► � z , I i fTTTTTIT11TiTTTTT �u UJ e I '1 L I 111ill' ,U- ® YIL I w �I I I '1!1�:1 � .W._,J_L1.,1 � L.� ,.1_'� _ II i I j I i I I C I j I - , 11T11TT;I!,ITl7, Till 7m A ® Purz. _ IW U]JILL l II I � I j l l l l _ lil I ........................ -- Iles CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) CERTIFICATE OF POSTING NOTICE OF IMPROVEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows: That the undersigned is now, and at all times herein men- tioned was, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of .Huntington Beach, California. That on the day of 0 04P P 46 , 1975 , the under- signed caused to be posted Notices of Heap ng, a copy of which Notice is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, along the line of said contemplated work and improvement, and on all the open streets within the district described in Resolution No. 7 Passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the 21st day of _ April 1975. That said Notices were posted not more than three hundred (300) feet apart along the line of said contemplated work and improve- ment, and on all the open streets within the district proposed to be assessed for the doing of said work, and that not less than three (3) Notices in all were posted; that said posting was completed on the 4�7-V,4 day of _� , 1975. EXECUTED on the day of f , 1975 , at Hunting- ton Beach, California. APPROVED AS TO BOHM; , DON P. BONFCITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF City Attorney HUNTINGTON BEACH, . CALIFORNIA By: Deputy City Attorney Ar CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) CERTIFICATE OF POSTING NOTICE OF IMPROVEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows: That the undersigned is now, and at all times herein men- tioned was, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California. That on the S day of 1975 , the under- signed caused to be posted Notices of Hea4lng, a copy of which Notice is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, along the line of said contemplated work and improvement, and on all the open streets within the district described in Resolution No. yOG 7, passed and adopted by the City Council of said City on the 2 st day of _April 1975. That said Notices were posted not more than three hundred (300) feet apart along the line of said contemplated work and improve- ment, and on all the open streets within the district proposed to be assessed for the doing of said work, and that not less than three •(3) Notices in all were posted; that said posting was completed on the J"M day of , 1975. EXECUTED on the SA day of , 1975, at Hunting- ton Beach, California. APPROVED AS TO FOPMt.- DON P. BONFA CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF City Attorney HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By: Deputy City Attorney NOTI- CE OF HEARING Published Huntington Beach News, May ment are as shown upon a map of the west Street to Seventeenth Street 1, May 8, 1975. District entitled: EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Ave- RESOLUTION NO. 4097 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.7301 nue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from CALIFORNIA hereto approved and adopted by the City Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Council and a copy of which is on file TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMINA• in the office of the City Clerk of said Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY- TION THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE City and referenced for further particu- SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue AND NECESSITY REQUIRES CERTAIN fare. to Orange Avenue. ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS IN AN SECTION 4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN B. The construction of certain alley im- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND SETTING THAT ON MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF provements including grading, paving, A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING MAY, 1975, at 7:00 O'CLOCK PM IN underground communication and tole- THEREON. THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY phone facilities, drainage 'facilities ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 7301 and appurtenances and appurtenant (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, work in ALLEYS within blocks 418, WHEREAS, Section 17 of Article X111 of LOCATED AT 2000 MAIN STREET, HUNT- 419, 420, 421. 42Z 517. 518, 519, 520 INGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648, 521, 522, 617, 618, 619. 620, 621, and the Constitution of the State of Cali- THERE SHALL BE A PUBLIC HEARING 622,fom Tract ia provides that the debt limitation BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE all of the Huntington Beach and majority protest provisions of said Tract Seventeenth Street Section,gen- PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER.se erally as bounded by Palm Avenue of such shall not apply if, after giving OR NOT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND on the north, Orange Avenue on the of such reasonable notice by publication NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ABOVE DES• Street on the east. Seventeenth eS St,outh Sv and posting and the holding of such CRIBED IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISI- south, the Street St the west Fur- public hearing as the City Council shall TION. Fur- have prescribed, said Council, by not ther, said project shall include the less than four-fifths (4/6) vote of all SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall acquisition, if necessary, of all street members thereof, finds and determines publish this Resolution in the "Hunting- right of way necessary to accomplish that the public convenience and neces. ton Beach News", a newspaper of gen- said improvements and for further sity require the improvement Proposed eral circulation In the City of Huntington particulars, reference is hereby made to be madet and, Beach on two successive dates, the to the map attached hereto showing WHEREAS, Section 2804 of the Streets first publication to be made not less the general nature, location and ex- and Highways Code of the State of Cali- than ten (10) days prior to the date of tent of the proposed works of im- the above public hearing. provement fomia provides that the "Special and Ma-Special Assess- SECTION 6. That the City Clark shall APPROVED and ADOPTED this 215t day ment Investigation, Limit cause Notice of said hearing to be of April, 1975. tority Protest Act o�9ot shall not apply posted along the line of the contemplated, NORMAto any when so otherwise subject work and on all open streets within the MAYOR F THE Y OF BBS thereto when said improvement Pro- Assessment District at not more than MAYOR OF THE CITY OF citycee has are pi a charter city and said three hundred (300) feet In distance HUNTINGTON BEACH, city has compiled with the provisions apart on each street so posted. CALIFORNIA of Section 17 of Article XIII of the Con-stitution of the State of California;and, SECTION 7. The City Clerk is directed ATTEST: WHEREAS, the City of Huntington to mail Notices of said hearing to all ALICIA M. WENTWORTH Beach Is a charter city of the State of persons owning real Property Proposed CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF California, to be assessed, whose names and ad- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RE- dresses.appear on the last equalized STATE OF CALIFORNIA SOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE assessment roll for the City taxes, said COUNTY OF ORANGE as. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALI- mailing to be completed at least fifteen CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: (15) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. 1, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, City Clerk SECTION 1. That the above recitals SECTION 8. The following is a general of the City of Huntington Beach, Cali- are all true and correct fomia, DO HEREBY :CERTIFY that the SECTION 2. That it is the preliminary description of the proposed works of Im- foregoing Resolution, being Resolution determination of said is Council that provement to be constructed within said No. 4067, was duly passed, approved and City Assessment District: adopted by said City Council, approved the public convenience and necessity A. The construction of certain street and signed by the Mayor, and attested require that certain public street and improvements Includin necessary re- utility improvements and acquisition in g by the City Clerk, all o a meeting of the City of Huntington Beach, California, motel, and the installation of curbs, said City Council held on the me day hereinafter described, be made and that gutters, sidewalks, driveway drainage of April, 1975, and that the same was the cost and expense thereof be paid ches,structures, paving, street lights, drainage passed and adopted by the following for by special assessments levied upon structures, ornamental vegetation and vote, to wits the property within the District benefited irrigation system, water house service AyE5: COUNCILMEN: thereby; and that all necessary pro- together with appurtenances and a Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, ceedings therefore be had and taken appurtenant work including all inter- Wieder, Duke, Gibbs without compliance with the provisions erl-section work in PALM AVENUE,south- NOES. COUNCILMEN: of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Street t centerline, from ee. GOLD-nwest None Limitation and Majority Protest Act of Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLD- 1931:' ENWEST, easerly of centerline, Palm ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: SECTION 3. That certain costs and Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE None expenses of said acquisition and improve- AVENUE, northerly of centerline,from DATED this 22nd day of April, 1975. 4 Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth ALICIA M. WENTWORTH ment shall be assessed against the lands Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, west- benefited thereby, and the boundaries of erly of centerline, from Palm Avenue CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF the district of lands proposed to be as- to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALI- sessed to pay the costs and expenses of from Goldenwest to Seventeenth FORNIA said proposed acquisition and Improve- Street. PECAN AVENUE from Golden- (SEAL) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) CERTIFICATE OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) ALICIA M. WENTWORTH , under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows : That she is the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, that she did, on the -7!! day of post on or near the Council Chamber door, NOTICE OF HEARING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) a copy of which Notice is attached hereto and made a part of this certificate; that said Notice remained continually posted for at least five (5) days after the date above-mentioned. EXECUTED on 1975 , at Huntington Beach , California. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P. BONFA City Attorney CITY CL RK OF THE CITY' OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, -CALIFORNIA By. Deputy City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 4067 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL COVERING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRES CERTAIN ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS IN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of California provides that the debt limitation and majority protest provisions of said section shall not apply if, after giving of such reasonable notice by publication and posting and the holding of such public hearing as the City Council shall have prescribed, said Council, by not less than four- fifths (4/5) vote of all members thereof, finds and determines that the public convenience and necessity require the improvement proposed to be made; and, WHEREAS, Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California provides that the "Special Assessment Investiga- tion, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" shall not apply to any proceedings otherwise subject thereto when said improvement proceed- ings are by a charter city and said city has complied with the provisions of Section 17 of Article XIII of the Constitution of the State of Cali- fOrnia; and, WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach is a charter city of the State of California, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA# AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That it is the preliminary determination of said City Council that the public convenience and necessity require that . certain public street and utility improvements and acquisition in the City of Huntington Beach California, hereinafter described, be made and. that the cost. and expense thereof be paid for by- special assessments levied upon the property within the District benefited thereby; and that all necessary proceedings therefore be had and taken without compliance with the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931." SECTION 3. That certain costs and expenses of said acquisition and improvement shall be assessed against the lands benefited thereby., and the boundaries of the district of lands proposed to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of said proposed acquisition and improvement are as shown upon a map of the District entitled: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) hereto approved and adopted by the City Council and .a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City and referenced for further particulars. SECTION 4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON MONDAY THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 1975• , AT 7:00 O'CLOCK PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, LOCATED AT 2000 MAIN STREET, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648, -j" THERE SHALL BE A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISITION. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall publish this Resolution in the "Huntington Beach News" a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Huntington Beach on two successive dates, the first publication to be made not less than ten (10) days prior. to the . •..-dabs- of the above public hearing. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall cause Notice of said hearing to be posted along the line of the contemplated work and on all open streets within the Assessment District at not more than three hun- dred (300) feet in distance apart on each street so posted. SECTION 7. The City Clerk is directed to mail Notices of said hearing to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed, whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized assessment roll for the City taxes, said mailing to be completed at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. SECTION 8. The following is a general description of the . proposed works 'of improvement to be constructed within said Assessment District: A. The construction of certain street improvements including neces- sary removal, and the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, paving, street lights , drainage structures, ornamental vegetation and irrigation system, water house services, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work including all intersection work in PALM AVENUE, southerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLDENWEST,. easterly of.center line, Palm Avenue to Orange. Avenue. ORANGE AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, westerly of centerline, from Palm Avenue to Orange ,Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE from GoldenWest to Seven- teenth Street. PECAN AVENUE from Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange .Avenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET rom elm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. B. The.construction of certain alley improvements including grading, paving, underground communication and telephone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtenances and appurtenant work in ALLEYS within blocks 418, 419, 420, . 421, 422, 517, 518, 519, 520, 2_1�522, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, and 622, all of the. Huntington Beach Tract Seventeenth Street Section, generally as bounded by Palm Avenue on the north, Orange Avenue on the south, Seventeenth Street on. the east, Goldenwest Street on the west. 'Further, said project shall include the acquisition, if necessary, of all street right of way necessary to accomplish said improvements and for further particulars, reference is hereby made to the map attached hereto showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed works of improvement. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of ARrti, 147s MAY/R OF'THE TY 0?�i_ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORS: 6� � DON P. BONFA City Attorney -CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF -2- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By: Deputy City Attorney J � TT-.,;?j1--;,;I';' ,-r�:,l;;;. i 7iu, 1, Ili!111!4 !I:IINISI: - - - �-#-• li.l 11;.!i'll1l 'n; I M O - • Ilrjj -'. -�i!.:ij!T�'!?I il. • i%"iTi%�i7T;!':_...i,= U✓ -i�". -i1;11 ww � . --F .T----T ( . I I � _� �::a__•_.: W - T -lei qfvFT - 1 C-2 7711, T rmr I . rT • a • m ---- -=1-' I ==i-;l I r 14 I-i iurru i i III I I t I i Jr qp _ltl .I LUo • Li 1 L VOM+wae .. i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) h, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH , City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No, 4007 was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held .on the 21st day of April 19 75, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None DATED this 22nd day of April 19 75 CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH; CALIFORNIA (SEAL) . r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) CERTIFICATE OF POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) ALICIA M. WENTWORTH , under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows : That she is the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, that she did, on the day of post on or near the Council Chamber door, NOTICE OF HEARING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) a copy of which Notice is attached hereto and made a part of this certificate; that said Notice remained continually posted for at least five (5) days after the. date above-mentioned. EXECUTED on 1975 , at Huntington BQ,ach, Cal}fornia. lee.4� APPROVED AS TO FORM; C 4CL OF TTf E CITY OF DON P. BONFA HUNTINGTON BEACH,. CALIFORNIA City Attorney By: Deputy City Attorney City o.. AVENUE, nutherly of center m.., ,. lays. Goldenwest Street to Seventeenth SECTION 4. NOTICr Street SEVENTEENTH STREET, west THAT ON MONDAY, THE 19 i n _ erly of centerline, from Palm Avenue li MAY, 1975, at 7:00 O'CLOCK PM I. to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE' THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF from Goldenwest to Seventeenth THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Street. PECAN AVENUE from Golden- OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, west Street, to Seventeenth Street.! LOCATED AT 2000 MAIN STREET, HUNT- EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Ave- INGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648, nue to Orange Avenue. NINETEENTH THERE SHALL BE A PUBLIC HEARING STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from PURPOSE OF DETERMINING WHETHER Palm Avenue to Orange _Avenue. OR NOT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND i TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm NECESSITY REQUIRE THE ABOVE DES- Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY- CRIBED IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISI- SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue TION. to Orange Avenue. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall B. The construction of certain alley im- publish this Resolution in the "Hunting- provements including grading, paving, ton Beach News", a newspaper of gen- underground communication and tele- eral circulation in the City of Huntington phone facilities, drainage facilities Beach on two successive dates, the and appurtenances and appurtenant first publication to be made not less work in ALLEYS within blocks 413, 'than ten (10) days prior to the date of 419, 420, 421, 422, 517, 518, 519, 52C Ithe.above'public hearing.'; -': 521, 522, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, ana erk shall 62Z all of the Huntington Bead, SECT,ION-`6-` Tht. he;Ce(tY'!C, Tract Seventeenth Street Section, cause Notice of sa-id `tlea'rtn � to be gen- posted along the line of the contemplated erally as bounded by Palm Avenue work and on all open streets within the on the north, Orange Avenue on the Assessment District at not more than south, Seventeenth Street on the east, three hundred (300) feet in distance Goldenwest Street on the west. Fur. f they, said project shall include the apart on each street so posted, acquisition, if necessary, of all street SECTION 7. The City Clerk is directed! right of way necessary to accomplish to mail Notices of said hearing to allI said improvements and for further persons owning real property proposed; particulars, reference is hereby made to be assessed, whose names and ad-! to the map attached hereto showing dresses appear on the last equalized i the general nature, location and ex. assessment roll for the City taxes, said i tent of the proposed works of im. mailing to be completed at least fifteen provement. 1(15) days prior to the date set for the APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day public hearing, of April, 1975. SECTION S. The following is a general NORMA BRANDELL GIBBS of �h.� �rr�t��tis}G '1vC�"i:� C: - , -• MAYOR OF THE CITY OF provement to be constructed within said HUNTINGTON BEACH, Assessment District: i CALIFORNIA A. The construction of certain street ATTEST: improvements including necessary re- ALICIA M. WENTWORTH moval, and the installation of curbs, ;ITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF gutters, sidewalks, driveway approa- ` HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA str uctures, STATE OF CALIFORNIA paving, street lights, drainage struc tures, ornamental vegetation and -OUNTY OF ORANGE , irrigation system, water house servi ss. .,ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH J es, together with appurtenances andd appurtenant work including all inter- 1, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, City Clerk section work in PALM AVENUE,south- of the City of Huntington Beach, Cali- erly of centerline, from Goldenwest lorniay DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLD- foregoing Resolution, being Resolution FNWEST, edserty of centerline, Palm No. 4067, was duly passed, approved and Orange Avenue. ORANGE adopted by said City Council, approved frnm and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of April, 1975, and that the same was ,passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN; None DATED this 22nd day of April, 1975. 1 ALICIA M. WENTWORTH CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALI- FORNIA (SEAL) Affidavit of Pv)WicatIon published Hunti/\r Beach News, May 1 May'$, 1975. State Of California 1, RESOLUTION NO. 4067 County of Orange SS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, City of Huntington Beach CAEIFORNIA George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years. COVERING PRELIMINARY OFT'ERMINA That he is the printer and TION THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE P publisher of the Huntington Beach AND 'NECESSITY RSOUIRES CERTAIN, News, 'a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS IN AN lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND SETTING County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide THEREON. subscription list Of paper has been 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.'7301 P � paying subscribers and said established, printed and published in the State of California, and (TOWN LOT;'A'SSESSMENT DISTRICT). WHEREAS, Section 17 of,Article XIII of; County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication the Constitilton of the State of ,Cali- of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not fornia .provides that the debt Limitation' devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any and majority protest provisions' of said; particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or section shall�not apply if, after giving any number thereof. of such reasonable notice by publication and posting and the holding of such The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper public hearing as the City Council shall of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court have prescribed, said Council, by not of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. less. than fo' ,offtns (a/s) vote of all members thereof, finds and determines that the public convenience •and neces- That the RFPQT 1jTTnN Pj�- 4067 to bermade; and,improvement proposed I WHEREAS, Section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Cali- fornia provides that the "Special Assess- of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- merit Investigation, Limitation' and Ma- jority Protest Act of 1,931"shall not apply Ito any proceedings otherwise subject paper at least two lacy ue a thereto whom,Said improvement pro- ceedings;_&,e,3by a charter city and said city has'cernotied with the provisions commencing from the day of May -of Section 17`of Article XIII of the Con- stitution of:Ahe Siate of California; and, r�r� WHEREAS, -.thd City of Huntington 1911—, and ending on the 8th_ day of Flay Beach is,a charier city of the State of California, NOW, THRRgFORE, IT IS HEREBY RE- 192-5--, both days inclusive, and as often during Said period and SOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF >I"IlIN4FNGTON BEACH, CALI- times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the FORNIA, AS`POLLOWS: regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a SECTION' 1. That the above recitals supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following are a.0 true and correct dates, to-wit: SECTION 2. That it is the preliminary determination,,<of said City Council that' .� May I May $ 1 925 the public convenience and necessity require that,:certain public street*and; utility improvements and acquisition in the City of Huntington Beach, California, hereinafter described, be made and that, the cost and expense thereof be paid, for by special assessments levied upon the property within the District benefited thereby; and that all necessary pro- Plfblisher ceedings therefore be had and taken Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th da of without compliance with the provisions y of the "Special Assessment Investigation, r�r Limitation and Majority Protest Act of May 1915 1931:' SECTION 3. Th`at certain costs and expenses of said acquisition and improve- f merit shall be assessed against the lands Notary Public benefited thereby, and the boundaries of Orange County, California the district of lands proposed to be as- sessed to pay"-the costs and expenses of said?proposed acquisition and improve- - ---- merit are as shown upon a map of the Dis rict entitled: THOMAS D. E ASSESSMENT'DISTRICT N0.7301 Not ar i (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) t y pub W1'LLI lic"California ; hereto approved arldiadoPtcd by."the City Orange County + Council and a copy of which is on file My Commission i in the office' of the City Clerk of said Expires --nd referenced for further particu- �.,15eptember )2, ' ------_! -rS HEREBY GIVEN "' -DAY OF r'Fy of Huntington Beach County of Orange State of California Affidavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher Huntington Beach News Filed Clerk By Deputy Clerk THE CITY COUNCIL OF THL CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, LOCATED AT 2000 MAIN STREET, HUNT-1 419, 420, 421, 422, 517, 518, , 5 0 INGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648, 521 522, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621, and THERE SHALL BE A PUBLIC HEARING 62Z all of the Huntington Beacrt BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE Tract Seventeenth Street Section,gen- PURPOSE OF DETERMINING, WHETHER eraily as bounded by Palm Avenue OR NOT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND on the north, Orange Avenue on the NECESSITY REQUIRE THE-ABOVE"DES- south, Seventeenth Street on the east, CRIBED IMPROVEMENT AND ACQUISI- Goloenwest Street on the west. Fur. TION. ther, said project shall include the SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall acquisition, if necessary, of all street Publish this Resolution in the "Hunting- right of way necessary to accomplish ton Beach News", a newspaper of gen- + said improvements and for further eral circulation in the City of Huntington particulars, reference is hereby made Beach on two successive dates, the I to the map attached hereto showing first publication to be ,made not less the general nature, location and ex- than ten (10) days prior to the date of tent of the proposed works of im- the above pubtic'hearing.; ; provement. SECTION 6 "Thht the #sty Clerk shall APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day cause Notice" of said hearing to be of April, 1975. posted along the line of the contemplated NORMA BRANDELL GIBBS work and on all open streets within the MAYOR OF THE CITY OF Assessment District at not more than HUNTINGTON BEACH, three hundred (300) feet in distance l CALIFORNIA apart on each street so posted. j ATTEST: ,. SECTION 7. The City Clerk is directed ALICIA M. WENTWORTH to mail Notices of said hearing to all Persons owning real property proposed' ATY CLERK OF THE CITY OF to be assessed, whose names and ad- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA dresses appear on the last equalized STATE OF CALIFORNIA I assessment roll for the City taxes, said ;OUNTY OF ORANGE } ss. mailing to be completed at least fifteen ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (15) days prior: to the date set for the public hearing. I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, City Clerk SLSECTION_8.• The following is a genera: of the City of Huntington Beach; Cali- Imo„_ -thn f- d .M a _e t fornia, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the desi ` p• y3QbC�- " foregoing Resolution, being Resolution Pro'vement to be constructed within said' No. 4067, was duly passed, approved and Assessment District: adopted by said City Council, approved A. The construction of certain street and signed by the Mayor, and attested I improvements including necessary re- by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of moval, and the installation of curbs, said City Council held on the 21st day gutters, sidewalks, driveway approa- of April, 1975, and that the same was ches, paving, street lights, drainage passed and adopted by the following " structures, ornamental vegetation and vote, to wit; irrigation system, water house servic- AYES: COUNCILMEN Coen., Matney, es, together with appurtenances and Shipley, Bartlett, appurtenant work including all inter- Wieder, Duke, Gibbs section work in PALM AVENUE,south- NOES: COUNCILMEN: erly of centerline, from Goldenwest None Street to Seventeenth Street. GOLD- ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: ENWE$T, easerly of centerline, Palm None Avenue to Orange Avenue. ORANGE DATED this 22nd day of April, 1975. AVENUE, northerly of centerline, from Goldenwest Street to '-Seventeenth ALICIA M. WENTWORTH Street. SEVENTEENTH STREET, west- CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF erly of centerline, from Palm Avenue HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALI- to Orange Avenue. ACACIA AVENUE FORNIA from Goldenwest to Seventeenth (SEAL) Street. PECAN AVENUE from Golden- -- — west Street to Seventeenth Street. EIGHTEENTH STREET from Palm Ave- nue to Orange rAvenue. NINETEENTH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTIETH STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. TWENTY-FIRST STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange,Avenue. TWENTY- SECOND STREET from Palm Avenue to Orange Avenue. B. The construction of certain alley im- provements including grading, paving, underground communication and tele- phone facilities, drainage facilities and appurtp -races and appurtenant W-1, -. Affidavit of Pv1-i ication ~Published ington Beach News, May 1, May.8, k97755. � RES QN NO. 4087 State of California + CITY OF. ON BEACH, County of Orange SS 'CALIFORNIA City of Huntington Beach I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILI George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a COVERING PRELIMINARY DETE MINAI TIOIENC citizen of the United States over the age of twenty-one AND THAT THE PUBLIC REQCONUIRES CERTA14Q � g Y' years. AND NECESSITY REQUIRES CERTAIN, That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach ACQUISITION IMPROVEMENTS IN AN News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND SETTI I N fi A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEAR N G shed in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said FTVE,REQNv � County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NQ. 7301 of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT);' subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been WHEREAS, Section 17 of Article XIII o established, printed and published in the State of California, and the constitution of the state of Cali- County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication fornia provides that the debt limitation of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not and majority protest provisions of said published for the entertainment of an section snail not' apply if, after giving' devoted to the interest of, or P Y of such reasonable notice by publication particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, Or and- posting and the holding of such any number thereof. public hearing as the City'Council shall The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper have prescribed, said Council, not less-than four-fifths (4/5) vote o of all l of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court members thereof, finds and determines of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. that the public convenience and neces- sity'require the improvement proposed to be made; and, , That the _ RESOLUTION .NO, 4o67 WHEREAS, section 2804 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Cali- fornia provides that the "Special Assess- ment Investigation, Limitation and Ma- of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- tority Protest Act of 1931" shall not apply to any proceedings otherwise subject thereto when said improvement pro- ceedings are by a charter city and said paper at least city Fias complied with the provisions of Section 17 of Article XIII of the Con- stitution of the State of California; and, commencing from the 18t day of MBLY WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach is a charter city of the State of California, and ending on the 8th day of May NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RE SOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL QF THE( CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALI-I ove recita 1975 . both days inclusive, and as often during said period and FORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the SECTION 1. That the at3ls; regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a are all true and correct supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following SECTION 2. That the preliminary dates, to-wit: determination of saidd City Council that .he public convenience and necessity require that certain public street and May 1, May 8 19 75 utility improvements and acquisition in the City of Huntington Beach, California, hereinafter described, be made and that the cost and expense thereof be paid for by special assessments levied upon the property within the District benefited thereby; and that all necessary pro- mr^ L� JZ2 ceedings therefore be had and taken; ublisher without compliance with the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investigation,l Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 9th day of Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931;' SECTION 3. That certain costs and May 19 — expenses of said acquisition and improve- ment shall be assessed against the lands (� � ,/ benefited thereby, and the boundaries of Notary Public the district of lands proposed to be as- sessed to pay the costs and expenses of Orange County, California said proposed acquisition and improve- ment are as shown.upon a map of the District entitled: 7------------------ __ " ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 j THOMAS D. WYLLIE � (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) r w.. , hereto approved and adopted by the City, r Notary Public-California Council and a copy of which is on file r in the office of the City Clerk of said r, T Orange County r i , City and referenced for further particu- r My Commission Expires r lars. Septembar 12, 197E r SECTION 4. NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN ------ ---------------! THAT ON MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 1975, at 7:00 O'CLOCK PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF ' `y of Huntington Beach County of Orange State of California Jffidavitof Publication of GEORGE FARQUHAR Publisher 'Huntington Beach News i Filed Clerk By Deputy Clerk I r r ` RESOLUTION NO. 4066 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING A PLAT SHOWING THE GENERAL NATURE, LOCATION AND EXTENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT WORK AND SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, the City Council has received a plat showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed street improve- ment work and also designating and describing the boundaries of the area proposed to be assessed in what is known and designated as : ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : • SECTION 1. That the above recital is true and correct. SECTION 2 . That a plat of the assessment district showing the general nature, location and extent of the proposed public improve- ment work and also showing and describing the boundaries of the proposed assessment district and lands and property to be specially assessed to pay all the costs and expenses of the proposed improvements designated as; ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) hereby submitted, be and the same is hereby approved and adopted. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of April MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: • APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P. BONFA CITY CLERK OF THE CITY-' OF City Attorney HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By: Deputy City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 4066 , was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of April 19 75 , and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES : COUNCILMEN: Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES : COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN : None DATED this 22nd day of April 19 75 . CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SEAL) ♦ i RESOLUTION NO. 4065 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL PRESCRIBING STEPS NECESSARY FOR CONDUCT OF A PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE THEREOF ON THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY WHERE SPECIAL : ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS ARE PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE "SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931. " ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1 . PROCEDURE AUTHORIZED. Before the Council adopts any resolution ordering the construction of any public improvement or the acquisition of any property for public use, or both, herein referred to as "improvement, " where the cost thereof is to be paid in whole or in part by special assessments or through special assessment taxes upon lands , a public hearing may be held and a finding and determination made by the Council as provided herein that the public convenience and necessity require the same. If such procedure is not so followed and if such finding and determination is not made pursuant thereto, the requirements otherwise prescribed by the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" (Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code) and Article XIII , Section 17 of the Constitution shall- be complied with before any such resolution may be adopted. SECTION 2 . ORDER TO HOLD HEARING: DETERMINATION OF NATURE OF WORK. The Council may order and hold a public hearing to find and determine whether the public convenience and necessity require any such improvement. Before ordering such hearing the Council shall determine in general the nature , location and extent of such proposed improvement or acquisition. Reference may be made to one or more plans , profiles, specifications, maps or plats for the description of the improvement and for all particulars relative thereto, which plans, profiles, speci- fications, maps or plats shall be on file with the City Clerk or the City Engineer and open to inspection . SECTION 3 . DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICT . The Council shall also generally define the boundaries or extent of the district or lands to be specially assessed to pay all or any part of the cost of the proposed improvement. The district may be described by: (a) Stating the exterior boundaries thereof; or (b) Giving a description thereof according to any official or recorded map or maps . (c) Referring to a plat or map on file in the office of the City Clerk or City Engineer which shall indicate by a boundary line the territory to be included in the assessment district, and which shall govern_ for all details as to the extent of the district, SECTION 4 . TIME, PLACE AND NOTICE OF HEARING. The Council shall fix a time and place of public hearing on the question whether the public convenience and necessity require such improvement and shall order such hearing to be held by the Council. t J The Council shall also prescribe reasonable notice of hearing to be given by publication and posting, which notice shall satisfy the minimum requirements provided by this Resolution. In prescribing such notice reference may be made to this Resolution for particulars. Also, said Council may prescribe other notice as deemed necessary or within the public interest as it relates to the particular proceedings. SECTION 5. PUBLICATION OF NOTICE. The City Clerk shall cause notice of such hearing to be published twice in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in this City. The first publication shall be not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of such hearing. SECTION 6 . POSTING OF NOTICE. The Council shall direct the Superintendent of Streets to, and such Superintendent shall cause notice of such hearing to be conspicuously posted along the line of the con- templated work, at not more than 300 feet in distance apart, but not less than three in all , or, when the work to be done is only upon an entire crossing or intersection or any part thereof, in front of each quarter block or irregular block liable to be assessed. If the work is chargeable upon a district, copies of the notice shall also be posted on all the open streets within the district at not more than 300 feet in distance apart on each street so posted, but no pro- ceeding shall ever be held invalid for failure to post any street if this Section has been substantially complied -with. In every case all posting must be completed at least ten (10) days before the day set for hearing protests or objections. SECTION 7 . FORM AND CONTENTS OF NOTICE. Such notice shall, in legible characters , state briefly the work proposed, designating by its short title or otherwise the act or procedure resolution under which the project or improvement is proposed to be undertaken; that the costs thereof or a part of such costs shall be assessed against lands to be benefited thereby; the day, hour and place of the hearing; that the Council proposed to find and determine whether the public convenience and necessity require the improvement; and that after such finding the proposed improvement may be ordered without further debt limitation or majority protest proceedings. Other pertinent matters may be included in the notice. SECTION 8 . PROTESTS. At the time set for the hearing, pro- tests may be made by any person interested who objects to the determi- nation by the Council that public convenience and necessity require the improvement, or to the ordering of such improvement, without further proceedings for majority protest or debt limitations . SECTION 9 . HEARING: DECISION : EFFECT. The hearing may be continued from time to time. After the conclusion thereof and prior to adoption of a Resolution ordering the improvement, the Council shall consider and pass upon all protests filed and all matters presented and its decision thereon shall be final and conclusive. If by such decision the Council finds and determines by no less than a four-fifths (4/5) vote of all members thereof that the public convenience and necessity require such improvement the Council may thereafter, in accordance with the improvement act or procedure resolution specified or designated for the project, adopt a resolution ordering the improve- ment substantially as proposed, or as modified, altered or changed by order of the Council as authorized by the improvement act or procedure resolution for the project. After such finding and determination by the Council, the provision of law for debt limitation and majority protest as mentioned in Article XIII , -2- Section 17, of the Constitution shall not apply, and it shall not be necessary for the Council to prepare or to cause to be prepared, notice for hearing, hear, or report the hearing of any report thereon as to such improvement, except as may be required by the law or procedure resolution for the conduct of the improvement proceedings . SECTION 10. COMBINED HEARING AUTHORIZED. The hearing required by this Resolution may be a separate hearing or may be combined and held concurrently with the hearing required by the improvement act or Reso- lution of Intention, pursuant to which the improvement proceedings is proposed. SECTION 11. COMBINED NOTICE AUTHORIZED. Notice of hearing * required by this Resolution to be given by posting may be by posting a separate notice or may be by stating the necessary matters in a notice of hearing of protests posted pursuant to such improvement act or Reso- lution of Intention. The publication of notice of hearing as required herein may be by pub- lishing a separate notice, or by setting forth necessary recitals therefor in the Resolution of Intention, if published, or in such other notice of hearing of protests as may be published pursuant to such improvement act or Resolution of Intention. In any event there must be both posting and publication of notice of hearing in the manner and for not less than the time required herein, and the time, place and purpose of this hearing must be stated in such notice, all as required by the Act under which the work is to be per- formed. SECTION 12 . CONSTRUCTION. This Resolution shall be liberally_ construed in order to effectuate its purpose. SECTION 13 . CONSTITUTIONALITY. If any section, subsection or portion of this Resolution is declared to be invalid or unconstitu- tional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Resolution , and the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , California hereby declares that it would have adopted all of the remaining sections , subsections , and portions of this Resolution notwithstanding. SECTION 14 . SHORT TITLE. This procedure Resolution may be cited, kpown, and referred to as 'the "Public Convenience and Necessity Determination Resolution. " APPROVED. and ADOPTED this 21st day of April MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: DON P. BONFA City Attorney F HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA By: Deputy City Attorney -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH City Clerk of the City of _Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. -4065 was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the . 21st day of April 19 75 , and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES : COUNCILMEN: Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES : COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None DATED this 22nd day of April 19 75 . CITY CLERIC.-OF-THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH;, CALIFORNIA (SEAL) ' PICA, FILE NO. 27 Assessment bistricts: LEGIOLATIVE HISTORY RECORo Assessment District `#730] TAIL" DATE ACTION OF COUNCIL OR BOARD MINUTE`BOOK YO UME -PAGE 2/5/73 . Town Lot Assess Dist #1 - AD 7301 - Deleted from Agenda - 17th.S Orange G W - Palm - '8/20/73 Town Lot. Assess Dist #13-01 -,Approved -" auth Actin DPW to proceed w/formation of district; proceed w/ re aration of plans & specs & auth employment of special counsel 15 74-75 "_.1 21 74 Res 3827 Ad td - Assess Dist #73-01 - Appts Su t of Sts as Eng of A &. Assess Engineer: 15 250 2 Res 3828 - d td - Assess Dist 73-01 - Desig NewsDaver . 15 250 1 1 s 3829 - Adqtd ss so -Dist -01 - Dasig Atty15 251 1 21/74 Res _"3830 - Ad ted Assess Dist #73-01 - -Desig Map 15 251" ''.1/21174 Res" 3831 - a td Assess Dist 3-01. - ProVid for. Liquidated Damages 15 _ 251 Asseau . `2-4-74 Res 3838 - Ad�td." A tv'd Assess Dist. Ma -.. FILE No- TOPIC 27 Assessment Districts": Assessment District #7301 - Town Lot- 1 1,-*1 1 i'1 .1 1.e01 1 I I'rf I r IIlDrr:r:r:la.l ;i isrol i`°r1°I I- r I.i4wrl .11-1, r.i.`r"two l'IA1 1'1'1 1 '1610TI"I i.I"fI 1 I710I 1- 1 .1 1 1 '1 11w-, "• TYPIST..PLEASE.NOTE—THIS SCALE.CORRESPONDS:TO.TYPEWRITER (PIG)SCALE—SET PAPER GUIDES SO.TNAT CARD SCALE WILL.REGISTER WITH MACHINE SCALE WHEN CARD 18 TURNED INTO WRITING-POSITION. START INDEX THREE(3).POINTS FROM LEFT EDGE OF CARD. USE OTHER POINTS OF"SCALE FOR OTHER DIVISIONS OF VISIBLE TITLE.SET TAER,ATORS TO INSURE PERFECT ALIGNMENT OF EACH DIVISION Of INFORMATION. FOLD BACK OR REMOVE STUB AFTER TYPING. USE NEW TYPEWRITER R15M. ' REMINGTON RAND—20 DIVISION OF $PERRY RAND CORPORATION �uo•uFm 1 i SPECIAL. COUNSEL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 21st day of _ nril , 1975, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter called "Agency') and JOHN GANAHL III and F. MACKENZIE BROWN , attorneys at law (herein- after called "Counsel" ) WHEREAS , this City Council did by resolution, previously employ John T. Ganahl, attorney at law, now deceased, to act as special counsel for the purpose of conducting and carrying through to completion , certain proceedings , to be pursuant to either the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1.913 , " or. the "Improvement Act of 1911 , " said assessment districts covered by said Resolution of Employ- ment are as follows : Assessment District No. 7201 Assessment District No. 7301 Assessment District No. 7302 WHEREAS , at this time, this City Council is• desirous to have said proceedings carried through to completion and is further desirous to employ counsel as above set forth for said purpose. W I T N E S S E T H: IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED between the parties hereto that: SECTION 1 . Counsel shall perform all legal, services in con- nection with the following listed assessment districts for proceedings conducted either pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 , " being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code or the "Improvement Act of 1911, ". being Division 7 of said Code, pursuant to all the terms and conditions as set forth previously by resolution of the City Council with Mr. John T. Ganahl of Ganahl & Ganahl , relating to proceedings as . set forth as follows: ! Assessment District No. 7201 Assessment District No: 7301 Assessment District No. 7302 SECTION 2 . Should said proceedings be financed through bonds to issue pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 , " being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code, _said fee may be reduced to the following particulars : two percent (2%) of the first Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500, 000 . 00) of the• actual cost of construction and one percent (1%) of the balance thereof , exclusive of costs of incidental expenses . SECTION 3 . All other terms and conditions as previously re- lated to said proceedings are incorporated herein and it is further mutually agreed that, by the approval of this agreement, all costs or fees due or payable to Mr. John T. Ganahl will be paid by Counsel , - as. above set forth. SECTION 4. This Agreement may be terminated by either party hereto by mailing written notice thereof to the other party. SECTION 5. The above .legal fees are all chargeable as inci- dental expenses -to, .comp eted proceedings and thus are not a direct obligation of the Agency. SECTION 6 . Said services shall include the following : (a) Review of the dedication and acquisition of the tstreets and easements or other nroperty in which proposed work is to be located . i (b) Examination of the plans and specifications for the proposed work, the boundary map and assessment diagram of the assessment district, the assessment roll and diagram, bonds , and the giving of instruc- tions and advice in connection with the foregoing. (c) Recommendations as to procedure and actions that should be conducted. (d) Preparation of all resolutions; notices, contracts , bond forms , and other papers and documents required in the proceedings. (e) Examination of the proceedings, step by step, as taken. (f) . Appear at all hearings under the proceedings and attend any meeting where attendance is requested. (g) Issuance .of an unqualified- legal opinion attesting to the validity of the proceedings and the issuance of the bonds. AGENCY ATTEST: • MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA CITY CLERK .OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA .. COUNSEL JOHN GANAHL III . APPROVED AS TO.FORMt F. MACKEN ROWN DON P. BONFA City Attorney BY: Byt - eP10 Ci y Atto , • V -2- I' RESOLUTION NO. 4064 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, . CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION THEREOF WHEREAS, there has been submitted to this City Council an agreement relating to special counsel services for certain special assessment districts presently initiated or in process by the City of Huntington Beach, California; and, WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to pro- ceed with said assessment districts as set forth in said agreement and is desirous to employ .special counsel for the purposes ofcompleting said proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That- the special counsel agreement for special assessment districts in the City of Huntington Beach, California,. as mentioned in said -agreement is hereby approved and execution is auth- orized by the Mayor and City Clerk. SECTION 3. A copy of said agreement, as approved, is attached hereto and so referenced. SECTION 4. A copy of said executed agreement shall be immedi- ately transmitted upon execution to the parties as set forth in said agreement. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 21st day of April , 1975 . 01 f r MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF 'ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, .ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 4064 was duly passed, approved and adopted by said City. Council, approved and signed by the Mayor, and attested by the City Clerk, all at a meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of April 1975, and that the same. was passed and adopted by the following vote,. to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEN Shipley, Bartlett, Coen, Matney, Wieder, Duke, Gibbs NOES: COUNCILMEN None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN None DATED this 22nd day of Az,.;j ,. 1975. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA (SEAL) The foregoing instrument is a cart�Ct COp� th# original file in this office. 9tte r Clty Clerk and"Ex. Cleric .of .the City C®uncll of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca►, I i HUNTINGTON BEACH CHAMBER of COMMERCE • 18582 BEACH BOULEVARD.SUITE 224 HUNTINGTON BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92NO TELEPHONE (714) 982-8881 HUNTINGTON BEACH RESOLUTION # 1973-7 RE: TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 73-01 WHEREAS, the townlot area lying between 17th Street and Goldenwest is blighted by substandard streets, sidewalks, lighting, utilities .and landscaping; and WHEREAS, the correction of these conditions through the usual procedure of piecemeal improvement as adjoining ,properties develop will take many years and will result in many duplication of costs; and WHEREAS, the City Staff have proposed an Assessment District (73-01) that will provide a unified improvement plan for an 18 block area, including renovation of all street improvements, undergrounding of utilities, extensive landscaping, and other appurtenant benefits; and WHEREAS, the construction of these improvements will benefit not only the Assessment District, but the surrounding area and the city as a whole; and WHEREAS, the proposed Assessment District will be voted upon by the affected property owners, and if approved, will be paid for by the property owners at no cost to the city, and WHEREAS, the proposed Assessment District can only be implemented through the sponsorship of the City of Huntington Beach; NOW, THEREFORE: The Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce does resolve as follows: 1. That it supports the concept of Assessment District 73-01, and favors the calling of an election of the affected property owners; and 2. That it recommends to the City Council of Huntington Beach that all appropriate assistance be given to the implementation of Assessment District 73-01, including the appropriation of such funds as may be required for preliminary legal and engineering work, providing that such funds be returned to the city by the Assessment District if formed. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Jerome Bame, President August 6_ 1973 Date ysf �A MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS iiilliV;IHCTH 6 OF MINUTES OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1974 MAR 25 All 1012 4 March 19, 1974 rIN RE: REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF DRAINAGE PROJECT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members present, the letter, dated February 28, 1974, from the City of Huntington Beach requesting assistance in the construc- tion of drainage facilities in the cities ' Assessment District 73-01 is ordered referred to the Chief Engineer of the Orange County Flood Control District for report back to the Board of Supervisors regarding possible inclusion in the 1974-75 budget. F 1013-2 2 t r pf RESOLUTION NO. G/DQ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CHANGES AND .MODIFICATIONS TO THE WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AS PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, this City Council has adopted a Resolution Covering Preliminary Determination relating to certain public works of improve- ment in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 7301 (TOWNLOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) ; and, WHEREAS , at this time, said City Council has held and conducted a public hearing on the proposed works of improvement and is desirous at this time to order certain changes and modifications to be made in the works of improvement as proposed to be constructed under said proceed- ings; and, WHEREAS , it appears to this Council that said changes and modifications are in the best public benefit and should be so ordered to be made at this time, I ! NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS : SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 . That the public interest, convenience and necessity require and this City Council hereby orders , certain changes and modi.fi cations to be made in the works of improvement as proposed to be con- structed under these proceedings , all as said amendments and modifications are shown on an attached Exhibit "A" hereby referenced, attached, and incorporated. SECTION 3 . That the Director of Public Works is hereby ordered to make the above changes and modifications on the map as previously presented and said changes and modifications are for the best interests of the property owners within the assessment district. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1975. • MAYOR OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON ~ BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTEST: I i CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA