Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2016-55 approving and adopting the 2016RESOLUTION NO. 2016-54 EXHIBIT "A" (Con't( 2016 Water Master Plan Update Estimated Costs for New Water Master Plan Proiects 21 ` k,` OC-44 Sliplining 30" at Creek Crossing d NA • Bsta,sated $ - Estanated CaetaU++ct MALE 2017 Est Ccnxfrus#datt toe $ 1,035,000 $J 1,035,000 Replacement 22 Peck Reservoir Dual Drive & Well 7 Security NA $ 2017 $ 11500,000 $ 11500,000 Production 23 Bolsa Chica 8" Water Main Extension. NA $ 2018 $ 200,000 $ 200,0W Distribution 24 Well 9H2SOdor Treatment' NA $ - 2017-18 $ 2,300,000 $ 2,300,000 Production 25 WOCWB OC-35 Relocate 33" for 1-405 Widening 2017 $ 210,000 2(118-19 $ 1,575,000 $ 1,785,000 Replacement 26 New Well 14 by McFadden/Gothard 2017 $ 750,000 2018-19 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,000,ODO Production 27 1.3 Miles of 24" to 30" Well Collection Line 2020 $ 500,000 2021-22 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,000,000 Distribution 28 New Well 15 in Ex -Navy Easement by Edwards 2020 $ 750,000 2021-22 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,000,000 Production 29 New Well 161n Ex -Navy Easement by Edwards 2022 $ 750,000 2023-24 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,000,000 Production 30 Security at Peck Reservoir& Well 13 2019 $ 100,000 202D $ 500,000 $ 600,0W Security 31 Aging Pipe Replacement {Intl. 5%of AC Pipe) Annual ` $ 7,500,000 Annual' $ 25,000,0W $ 32,500,DW Replacement $2 Sunset Beach Water Main Replacement Ph V NA $ 2019 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Replacement 33 8" Pipe Replacement Admiralty Bridge Rehab 2017 $ 25,000 2018 $ 75,000 $ 100,000 Replacement 34 8" Pipe Replacement Humboldt Bridge Rehab 2017 $ 25,ODO 2018 $ 75,000 $ 100,000 Replacement 35 OC-9 Replace 22" for 1-405 Widen (OCTA Pays) 2017 $ - 2018 $ - $ - Replacement 36 12" Pipe Replace for WS Widen (OCTA Pays) 2017 $ - 2018 $ - $ Replacement 37 8" Pipe Replace for 1-405 Widen by Sugar 2017 $ 75,000 2019 $ 400,000 $ 475,000 Replacement 38 Water Well 6 H2S Odor & Color Treatment 2019 $ 500,000 2020-21 $ 3,500.000 $ 4,000,WO Production 39 Water Well 8 1-12S Odor & Color Treatment 2023 $ 500,000 2024-25 $ 3,500,DW $ 4,000,000 Production 40 Talbert Lake Irrigation Project 2019 $ 150,000 2020 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 Production 41 Groundwater Master Plan 2025 $ 150,000 NA $ - $ 150,000 Study 42 Security at Well3A 2025 $ 50,000 2026 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 Security 43 Security at Well 2027 $ 5D,000 2028. $ 100,000 $ 150,000 Security 44 Seeurlty at Well 8 2029 $ 50,000 2030: $ 10MOU $ 150,000 Security 45. Security at Well 2031 $ 50,000 2032 $ 10010W $ 150,000 Security 46 Security at Well 10 2033 $ 50,000 2034 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 Security 47 Water Distribution Improvements Annual ` $ 200,000 Annual' $ 2,OW,000 $ 2,200,OW Distribution 48 Water System Corrosion Control Annual ` $ 100,000 Annual $ 1,000,000 $ 1,100,000 Corrosion 49 Water Production System improvements Annual' $ 200,000 Annual' $ 2,0W,000 $ 2,200,000 Production 50 WMP and Financial Plan Updates Every 5 Yrs $ 20D,000 NA $ - $ 200,000 Study 51 Urban Water Management Plans Every 5 Yrs $ 200,000 NA $ - $ 200,0W study 52 8.6 Miles OC-44 Corrosion Contro NA $ 2028-29 $ 4,140.000 $ 4,140,000 Corrosion 53 WOCWB OC-35 & OC-9 Corrosion Control 2032 $ 105,000 2033-34 $ 3,307,500 $ 3,412,.500 Corrosion 54 OC-44 Scour Protection 30" at Creek Crossing 2024 $ 41,400 2025 $ 621,000 $ 662,.400 Replacement 55 0vermyerBoosterStationDualDrive 2030 $ 300,000 2031-32 $ 1,7W,0W $ 2,000,OW Production 56 Peck Reservoir Roof Relplacement. 2032 $ 300,000 2033.34 $ 1,700,OW $ 2,000,000Production 57 Water Facilities Security Improvements Annual ` $ 100,000 Annual' $ 400,000 $ 500,000 1 Security Totall 1 $ 13,981,400 1 $ 75,878,500 $ 89,859,900 Fj 0 L P S 0 M A S -riq / //\ HB-568- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update 7 Figure 1-1 Existing Land Use RSOMAS 1-2 HB -587- Item 17. - 32 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 1-1 Existing Land Use % of Respective Total Net Area Category % of Total General Plan Land Use Category (Ac) Acreage Acreage Residential Low Density (3 to 7 DU/Ac) 5,260 68% 31% Medium Density (15 DU/Ac) 647 8% 4% Medium High Density (25 DU/Ac) 1,618 21% 9% High Density (30+ DU/Ac) 210 3% 1% Subtotal 7,735 100% 45% Commercial General Commercial 691 69% 4% Office 124 12% 1% Commercial Regional 100 10% 1% Neighborhood Commercial 80 8% <1% Subtotal 995 100% 6% Industrial Manufacturing 783 68% 5% Business Park 184 16% 1% Oil Production 135 12% 1% Warehousing 55 5% <1% Subtotal 1,157 100% 7% Open Space & Other Parks 630 33% 4% Beaches 423 22% 2% Water Recreational 249 13% 1% Commercial Recreational 244 13% 1% Habitat Conservation 212 11% 1% Open Space/Cemetery 86 4% 1% Agriculture (Nurseries) 81 4% <1% Subtotal 1,925 100% 1 11% Public Streets/Alleys/Roadways 3,839 72% 22% Public Schools 692 13% 4% Utilities 495 9% 3% Private School 111 2% 1% Religious 88 2% 1% Government Office 43 1% <1% Fire Service Related 10 <1% <1% Hospital 24 <1% <1% Rail and Transportation 22 <1% <1% Library/Senior Center 23 <1% <1% Municipal Parking 1 <1% <1% Subtotal 5,348 100% 31% TOTAL` 17,160 ,�,. 100% *Mixed use land use is not included in above the table P S 0 M A S 1-3 October 2016 Item 17. - 33 HB -588- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Uodate RL 7 pt—. RL 7 R11 Y77- anis M 49 n 7, r N RL-7 RL10. M RL,7 General Plan Designations I General Plan City of Huntington Beach ZM RL.7 now., RL7 7. K �7 W" UL All ir lI L to RL 7 1e. Figure 1-2 General Plan Build -out Land Use PSOMAS 1-4 HB -589- Item 17. - 34 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 1 Open space comprises 1,925 acres orlI% of the City. The open space uses consist of parks, beaches, commercial recreation uses, habitat conservation areas, cemeteries, agriculture, and water recreation uses located throughout the City. Public uses comprise 5,348 acres or 31% of the City. Public uses include government facilities, public and private schools, utility -related uses, hospitals, and religious institutions, as well as public right-of-way such as streets and alleys. There are 1,157 acres of industrial land in the City. The largest industrial area is in the northwest corner of the City where Boeing and the McDonnell Center Business Park are located. The second largest industrial area is the Gothard Industrial Corridor that borders Gothard Street between Ellis Avenue and Edinger Avenue. Another industrial area in the City is the Southeast Industrial Area, which is actually a composite of industrial, public, and open space conservation zoned land uses. The AES Huntington Beach Generating Station (power plant) is located in this area. A 38-acre land fill is also located in the Southeast Industrial Area. The Orange County Sanitation District No. 2 Wastewater Treatment Plant is located in the far southeast corner of the City. Both the power plant and the treatment plant are large City water users. The City completed the 2014 Existing Land Use Technical Report, but it has not yet been adopted by the City Council. It is available at http://www.hbthenextwave.org/wp- content/uploads/Revi sed-Land-Use-121814.pdf. 1.2 Population and Housing The population of the City's water service area is estimated at 198,429 for 2015, and is growing slowly, as there is very little remaining vacant land. Projected population is shown in Table 1-2, projected to increase by 4.4% from 2015 to 2040. The City provides water to over 53,091 service connections. The Huntington Beach water service area is predominantly residential with over 92 percent of water service connections serving single-family and multi -family residences. Table 1-2 Projected Population Projected 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Population 198,429 203,840 204,330 206,207 207,387 207,182 NOTES: Center for Demographic Research, California State University, Fullerton 2015 p S 0 M A S Item 17. - 35 1-5 October 2016 HB -590- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 2 2 WATER DEMAND Water demand has decreased over the past decade even though development has occurred and the City's population has increased during this time. Unaccounted-for water, which is the difference between water supply and water consumption and represents "lost" water, has decreased since 1995/96 and this decrease is attributed in large part to a leak detection survey conducted for the City in 1996/97. 2.1 Historical Potable Water Production Historical potable water production for 10 years 2005/06 through 2014/15 is shown in Table 2-1. The City's water year for the purposes of this report is July through June, whereas the City's fiscal year is October through September. The water year format is consistent with the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and Orange County Water District (OCWD) projections. All historical data presented in this water master plan is in accordance with the City's water year. Per the 2015 UWMP, 2014/15 demand was determined to represent average water demand at 27,996 AFY (25.0 million gallons per day (MGD) or 17,350 gallons per minute (gpm)). PSOMAS 2-1 October 2016 HB -591- Item 17. - 36 CD J W ■ .. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 2-1 Historical Potable Water Production (Acre -Feet) Chapter 2 Historical City Water Supply (2006-2015) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Average Total Water Production (AFY) 31,869 33,315 31,857 31,630 29,463 28,200 29,853 29,876 31,138 27,996 30,520 October 2016 is- i J w cc CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update 34,000 33,000 32,000 31,000 r- O 30,000 O 29,000 PS€iMAS 28,000 K81A Figure 2-1 Historical Potable Water Production 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year 2-3 Chapter 2 October 2016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 2 2.2 Historical Water Consumption/Unaccounted-For Water Historical City water consumption and unaccounted-for water for the six years 2009/10 through 2014/15 is shown in Table 2-2. Water consumption was developed from City billing records. Unaccounted-for water, also referred to as non -revenue water is the difference between metered water production and metered water consumption and represents "lost' water. Unaccounted-for water occurs for a number of reasons: • Water lost from system leaking, i.e. from pipes, valves, pumps, etc. • The City Fire Department performs hydrant testing to monitor the level of fire protection available throughout the City and the City Public Works Department, Utilities Division performs hydrant flushing to eliminate settled sediment and ensure better water quality. Neither is metered. However, the quantity of water used is estimated and taken into consideration when calculating unaccounted-for water. • Water used by the Fire Department to fight fires. This water is also not metered. • Customer meter inaccuracies. Meters have an inherent accuracy for a specified flow range. However, flow above or below this range is usually registered at a lower rate. Meters become less accurate with time due to wear. Based on the City's 2005 Water Master Plan, unaccounted-for water averaged 6.4% during the nine year period from 1996/97 to 2004/05. During the six year period from 2009/10 through 2014/15, unaccounted-for water has averaged 5.6%. Unaccounted-for water was 9.9% in 1995/96 but has decreased since then largely due to a leak detection survey conducted for the City in 1996/97. A total of 498 miles of pipeline was surveyed, with a water loss of approximately 67,000 gpd quantified from 17 identified leaks. The annual water loss from these leaks was quantified as approximately 24.4 million gallons. The City repaired all of the leaks identified in the survey and has since implemented an on -going leak investigation and repair program as a measure to keep water losses to a minimum while facilitating cost savings The City will continue to use the calibrated hydraulic model of the water system, to help estimate fire hydrant pressures. Only those fire hydrant pressures that are found to be deficient or close to deficient in the model will be verified in the field. Utilization of the model has essentially eliminated the need for fire hydrant flow tests. 2 City of Huntington Beach, 2005 Water Master Plan, March 2006 p S 0 M A S 2-4 October 2016 Item 17. - 39 HB -594- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 2 Table 2-2 Historical Water Consumption Historical City Water Consumption/Production/Unaccounted- For Water (Acre -Feet) 2010 1 2011 1 2012 2013 2014 2015 Average Consumption 27,896 126,445 1 27,890 27,983 29,383 26,894 27,748 Production 1 29,463 1 28,129 1 29,853 1 29,876 1 31,138 1 27,996 1 29,409 1 Unaccounted -For Water 1,567 1,684 1,963 1,893 1,755 1,102 1,661 Unaccounted -For Water % 5.3% 6.0% 6.6% 6.3% 5.6% 3.9% 5.6% The California Urban Water Conservation Council recommends a complete distribution system audit if unaccounted-for water exceeds 10%. With the City currently averaging less than 6%, an audit is not needed. Average daily per capita municipal and industrial (Per Capita M&I) water demand has been used by the water industry to measure and compare mean urban water demand. Per Capita M&I water demand includes the municipal, industrial, commercial, residential water demand, and unaccounted-for water associated with each person in the population. Historical Per Capita M&I water demand for the City is shown in Table 2-3. Table 2-3 Historical Per Capita M&I Demand Historical Per Capita Municipal and Industrial Water Demands Water Demand 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2015 Average Total Demand (AFY) 31,869 33,315 31,857 31,630 29,463 27,996 31,022 Population* 201,664 201,897 202,319 203,568 204,831 198,429 202,118 Total Per Capita (gpcd) 141.1 147.3 140.6 138.7 128.4 126.0 137.0 * Historical Census Data appears to be high prior to and including 2010, 2010 Census adjusted population. Although Per Capita M&I water demand is still a useful measure for evaluating urban water demand, the various demand components evaluated separately can offer a more complete perspective. Historical City water demands by billing classifications are shown in Table 2-4. pw S O M A 2-5 October 2016 HB3 95_ Item 17. - 40 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 2 Table 2-4 Historical Water Demand by Billing Class Historical City Water Demands Per Billing Classifications (Acre -Feet) Demands Per City Billing Class 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2015 Average Single Family Residential 14,769 15,715 15,144 14,830 13,937 12,959 14,559 Multi -Family Residential 6,721 6,869 6,704 6,579 6,298 5,918 6,515 Population (1,000) 201.7 201.9 202.3 203.6 204.8 198.4 200.2 Residential Per Capita (gpcd) 95.1 99.9 96.4 93.9 88.2 84.9 94.0 Commercial 4,013 4,415 4,206 4,086 3,700 3,538 3,993 Industrial 684 666 606 564 514 397 572 Insitutional/Municipal 88 258 300 229 169 137 197 Irrigation 2,650 3,211 3,209 3,119 2,759 2,894 2,974 Other 518 510 1 546 530 519 380 500 Total Demand (af) * 29,442 31,645 30,715 29,936 27,896 26,223 29,310 * Revenue generating water quantity only, and data range is July 1 to June 30. The demand data is from City billing data and does not include unaccounted-for water. Residential per capita demand for the most recent six years 2005/06 through 2009/10 and 2014/15 averaged 94.0 gpcd, which is 10.5% less than in 2003/04 (105 gpcd) and 16.1% less than in 1999/00 (112 gpcd). The downward trend in residential water use can be attributed in part to water conservation programs undertaken by the City including public information programs, school education programs, water survey programs, and plumbing fixture retrofits. It should be noted that the per capita residential use and total per capita use discussed above is not the same as the per capita calculation that must be reported as a part of the 20 x 2020 water conservation targets required by the State Department of Water Resources in Urban Water Management Plans starting with the 2010 Plan. The formula for developing the baseline per capita, 2020 target, and interim 2015 target to measure an agency's success in meeting the 20% mandated conservation by 2020 is somewhat different. Commercial and industrial water demand decreased from 4,697 AF in 2005/06 to 3,935 AF in 2014/15 (16.2% decrease). Decreased water use for the Commercial and Industrial billing categories can be attributed in part to the City's participation in MWDOC's and MWD's regional commercial, industrial, and institutional water -use efficiency programs, as well as the Metropolitan and MWDOC water allocation program put in effect in 2009/10 and lifted just prior to the end of 2010/11. Another reason for this decrease is the gradual implementation by the City of dual meters in place of single meters for metering commercial and industrial accounts as well as multi -family residential accounts. The PSOMAS 2-6 October 2016 Item 17. - 41 HB -596- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 2 purpose of this program is to separate irrigation use from potable water use as many of these meters currently measure both potable and irrigation water use. As new businesses come into the City or renovation of existing businesses occur, a separate irrigation meter is being installed by the owner when the landscape area exceeds 2,500 square feet. However, there is still a substantial amount of irrigation water use that is reported under the Commercial, Industrial and Multi -family billing categories. Implementation of this dual meter program has been occurring gradually over the past decade, plus. Under this program, one meter is dedicated to measuring internal water use under the Commercial or Industrial billing category, while a separate meter would be installed to measure irrigation water use under the Irrigation billing category. Over the nine-year period from 2005/06 to 2014/15, total irrigation meters have increased from 873 to 993 with the majority of those new meters being conversions from single to dual meters on an existing site. Even with this 13.7% increase in irrigation meters, irrigation use only increased from 2,650 AF in 2005/06 to 2,894 AF in 2014/15 (9.2% increase), primarily due to water conservation. Also, Irrigation water use is greatly affected by rainfall amounts. However, it is difficult to correlate Irrigation billing amounts to rainfall patterns. If the number of irrigation meters and acres being irrigated remained constant, a pattern could be more easily developed. The City participates in MWDOC's regional landscape irrigation efficiency programs and institutes irrigation efficiency parameters in the City Municipal Code. 2.3 Projected Water Demands Demand projections were developed by MWDOC for each agency within their service area based on available data as well as land use, population and economic growth. The projections in 5-year increments to Year 2040 are shown in Table 2-5 and were obtained from the City's 2015 UWMP. As shown in Table 2-5, the 2040 water demand is projected to be 30,396 AFY, 8.6% higher than the actual 2014/15 demand of 27,996 AFY. This increased water demand equates to an annual water demand growth of approximately 0.33% per year, compounded. Table 2-5 Projected Water Demands Projected Water Demands Water Demand 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 Total Demand (AFY)l 28,090 30,153 30,360 30,352 30,396 Total Demand (mgd)1 25.1 26.9 27.1 27.1 27.1 Population 203,840 204,330 206,207 207,387 207,182 Total Per Capita (gpcd) 1 123.0 131.8 1 131.5 1 130.7 1 131.0 (1) The above demand values were provided by MWDOC and reviewed by the City as part of the UWMP effort. As the regional wholesale supplier for much of Orange County, MWDOC works in collaboration with each of its retail agencies as well as Metropolitan, its wholesaler, to develop demand projections for imported water. PSOMAS 2-7 October 2016 HB -597- Item 17. - 42 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 2 The projected water demands discussed above are average annual demands typically displayed in AFY or average day demand (ADD) typically displayed in million gallons per day (MGD) or gallons per minute (gpm). Another important projection is maximum day demand (MDD) or the highest 24-hour demand over the course of a year as a water system must be capable of supplying MDD. The peak daily or diurnal fluctuation or the peak hour demand (PHD) is typically handled from operational storage in reservoirs so is not important in determining supply requirements. Based on extensive analysis, the 2005 Water Master Plan settled on a 1.8 MDD factor (MDD = 1.8 times the ADD) for the entire water system, which included a 15% factor of safety over measured data. A 2.7 MDD factor was selected for Zone 2, which is typical as a smaller area with less land use diversity experiences higher peaking factors. Monthly water use for the five year period ending in FY 2010 resulted in an average maximum monthly demand factor of 1.45, occurring in the month of August. Diurnal curves for a typical week in June of 2007 provided by City staff resulted in the maximum day of that week being 1.06 times the average day of the week. In order to achieve a 1.80 MDD factor, the maximum week would have to be 1.17 times higher than the maximum month (1.45 x 1.17 x 1.06 = 1.80), which is perfectly logical. Therefore, the factors utilized in the previous hydraulic model analyses are deemed to be appropriate for use in the modeling analyses conducted in this master plan. cs S 0 M A S 2-8 October 2016 Item 17. - 43 HB -598- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 3 WATER SUPPLY AND RELIABILITY The City's existing sources of potable water supply consist of eight currently active groundwater wells, three imported water connections, and four emergency connections with neighboring cities. Orange County Water District (OCWD) manages the Orange County Groundwater Basin (Basin), which the City overlies. OCWD sets a Basin Production Percentage annually, which allows the City and other Basin producers to pump groundwater up to the BPP percentage of their total water supplies to meet demands. The BPP was set at 75% for FY 2015/16 and was recently set at the same 75% for FY 2016/17 by the OCWD Board of Directors. The City also purchases treated, imported water from the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC), which is a member agency of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). The City has historically used more groundwater than imported water to meet demands as groundwater production is less expensive, at least in quantities up to the BPP. The City's water supply consistently meets or exceeds all State and federal potable water quality standards. The City maintains a water quality monitoring program consistent with State requirements. 3.1 City Water Supplies As a member agency of OCWD, the City is entitled to produce groundwater from the Basin. The Basin, which is managed by OCWD, is unadjudicated. The City and other Basin producers pay a Replenishment Assessment (RA) to OCWD for all groundwater produced up to a percentage of the producer's total water supplies used to meet demands. This percentage is called the Basin Production Percentage (BPP), which is set uniformly for all producers annually by OCWD based on Basin conditions and long-term projections. For FY 2015/16, OCWD set the BPP at 75%, with the RA at $342/acre-foot. However, for FY 2016/17 OCWD is increasing the RA by 27% to $402/acre-foot. In addition to the RA, OCWD charges a Basin Equity Assessment (BEA) for pumping in excess of the BPP, which is basically a penalty to help maintain the Basin at projected levels. The BEA, which is set at $548/acre-foot for FY 2016/17, essentially equates the cost of groundwater pumped over and above the BPP to the rate charged for imported water from MWDOC. The BEA rate will vary slightly between different member agencies of OCWD, as the rate is adjusted based on each member agency's groundwater pumping costs. The City supplements groundwater with treated, imported water from MWDOC at the (FY 2015/16) rate of $942/acre-foot exclusive of connection charges, readiness to serve charges, and other fixed fees, while groundwater rate is only $342/acre-foot. Both P S M A S 3-1 October 2016 1­113 -599- Item 17. - 44 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 imported water and groundwater rates shown above are costs to purchase water, and does not including any operating expense such as energy, chemical, well maintenance and other costs to maintain production facilities (i.e. OCWD's FY 2016/17 estimate of energy cost to extract water from the ground is $76/acre-foot). The City's water supply has averaged 67% groundwater pumped and 33% imported water purchases over the recent six -year period (2009/10 — 2014/15) as shown in Table 3- 1 and shown graphically on Figure 3-1. It should be noted, however, that the City participates in the In -Lieu or Cyclic Storage Program offered by OCWD and MWD, when available. This is a groundwater program that refills the Basin by avoiding pumping from the Basin, and is usually offered in the wetter years and in the lower demand period of October through April. In the program, OCWD requests the City to leave a number of its wells turned off and the City then takes replacement, or in -lieu, water through its imported water connections, which water is purchased by OCWD from MWD through MWDOC. OCWD purchases the in -lieu water at a reduced rate, and then bills the City the amount it would have had to pay for pumping energy and the RA as if it had produced the water from its wells. In addition, OCWD also periodically offer the City the Coastal Pumping Transfer Program (CPTP), similar to the In -Lieu program. The CPTP's primary objective is to further decrease the potential of salt water intrusion by reducing physical pumping of groundwater from coastal cities such as the City, and increase pumping of groundwater from inland cities by the same quantity. The City would thereby use more imported water but will not be burdened with the higher imported water rate for the amount of under pumping. Table 3-1 Groundwater Production vs. Imported Water Purchases (FY10 — FY15) Groundwater Production VS impor#ed Water' Purc ra.. , ...... w ._.�x.._ —_.r.. Groundwater 18,271.0 16,790.4 14,926.8 20,343.7 18,584.5 16,603.9 17,586.7 Imported Water b 11,192.0 11,409.6 14,926.2 9,532.3 12,553.5 11,392.1 11,834.3 Total (AFY) 29,463.0 28,200.0 29,853.0 29,876.0 31,138.0 27,996.0 29,421.0 % Imported 38% 40% 50% 32% 40% 41% 40% In-Lieu/CPTP Imported 0.0 729.6 4,443.8 0.0 3,232.9 3,432.0 1,973.1 Adjusted % Imported 38% 38% 35% 32% 30% 28% 34% (a) Data are from July to June each year (b) Imported water calculated from difference between total produced versus groundwater produced PSOMAS 3-2 October 2016 Item 17. - 45 HB -600- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 Figure 3-1 Groundwater Production vs. Imported Water Purchases (FY10 — FY15) 35,000.0 30,000.0 25,000.0 a 20,000.0 0 D u 15,000.0 0 L a 10,000.0 5,000.0 0.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Fiscal Year 3.2 Water Quality ■ Imported Water ❑ In-Lieu/CPTP Imported ■ Groundwater The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), which was enacted in 1974, is the main federal law that regulates potable drinking water standards. Under SDWA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets standards for drinking water quality and oversees the states, localities, and water suppliers who implement those standards. State potable water quality standards are set by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). The potable water quality standards listed in the title 22 California Code of Regulations include primary and secondary maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). Primary MCLs are established for a number of organic and inorganic chemicals, trihalomethanes, and radioactivity as they relate to public health. Secondary MCLs are established for chemicals or characteristics as they relate to taste, odor, or appearance of drinking water. These State MCLs are the same or in some cases more stringent than the federal MCLs. The City's water supply consisting of groundwater and imported surface water consistently meets or exceeds all State and federal potable water quality standards. The City maintains a water quality monitoring program consistent with CDPH requirements. As a result of the high quality of the City's source water supplies, the only water treatment conducted by the City is disinfection and fluoridation. The City disinfects at each of its well sites through the injection of gaseous chlorine (CL2) typically at a rate of about 1.0 milligrams per liter (mg/1) residual. The City receives imported surface water PSOMAS 3-3 October 2016 HB -60 1 - Item 17. - 46 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 that has been disinfected by MWD by means of chloramination typically at a rate of about 2.2 mg/l residual. The City has fluoridated its water supply to aid in the development of healthy teeth since 1972. The natural fluoride concentration in the local groundwater ranges from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/l. The City increases the fluoride concentration to between 0.7 and 1.3 mg/l via injection stations located at all wells. The City previously injected fluoride at the imported water connections until late 2007, when MWD began fluoridation of their water. The average fluoride level of the imported surface water at City turnouts is 0.8 mg/l. MWD conducts extensive monitoring of its treated water at the various treatment plants within its system. OCWD also conducts more extensive testing than required by all regulatory agencies on groundwater samples taken at all of the production and numerous monitoring wells throughout the Basin on behalf of its member agencies in order to stay on top of any potential contaminant that might be detected as well as to track migration of TDS and other water quality trends. Following is a summary of recent regulations relating to potential constituents of concern and their levels in the City's water supplies. Arsenic In January 2006, a new federal water quality regulation reduced the MCL for arsenic, an inorganic chemical, from 50 parts per billion (ppb) to 10 ppb. California's revised arsenic MCL of 10 ppb became effective in November 2008. The average arsenic level in the City's water supply has historically ranged between "Not Detected" to 3 ppb and has averaged "Not Detected". Accordingly, treatment of City supply sources to meet the stricter arsenic MCL is not required or anticipated. Groundwater Rule EPA initiated the Ground Water Rule (GWR) in November 2006, which specifies the appropriate use of disinfection in groundwater and addresses other components of groundwater systems to protect against bacteria and viruses in portable groundwater supplies. The requirements of the GWR include State -conducted system sanitary surveys and compliance monitoring for systems that disinfect to ensure that they reliably achieve 99.99% (4-log) inactivation or removal of viruses. The City currently disinfects at all of their well sites through the injection of gaseous chlorine. Radon Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that may be found in indoor air and in drinking water. Exposure to radon can increase the risk of contracting cancer. Radon in soil under homes presents a greater risk than radon in drinking water. There is currently no MCL for radon in drinking water. EPA has developed a proposed regulation to reduce radon in drinking water that includes a "Multimedia Mitigation" program option to reduce radon in air. PSOMAS Item 17. - 47 3-4 October 2016 HB -602- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update The proposed regulation offers two options: r3 • Option 1: States can choose to develop enhanced state-wide programs to address the health risks from radon in indoor air known as Multimedia Mitigation (MMM) programs while reducing radon levels in drinking water for individual water systems to 4,000 pCi/L (picoCuries per liter, a standard unit of radiation) or lower. EPA is encouraging states to adopt this option because it is the most cost- effective method and achieves the greatest radon risk reduction. • Option 2: If a state opts not to develop an MMM program, individual water systems in that state would be required to either reduce radon in their system's drinking water to 300 pCi/L or develop individual local MMM programs and reduce levels in drinking water to 4,000 pCi/L. Water systems already at or below the 300 pCi/L standard would not be required to treat their water for radon. Radon was monitored in the City's water supply between 2001 and 2006 and levels averaged 443 pCi/L (366 pCi/L in 2001, 443 pCi/L in 2002, 356 pCi/L in 2003, 314 pCi/L in 2004, 596 pCi/L in 2005, and 582 pCi/L in 2006). Radon treatment alternatives include aeration and treatment with granular activated carbon filters. Stage 2 Disinfection Byproduct Rule Chlorine and other chemical disinfectants used by public water systems to control microbial pathogens in drinking water interact with organic and inorganic materials in source water to form disinfection byproducts (DBP). Epidemiology and toxicology studies have shown a link between disinfection byproducts, specifically total trihalomethanes (THM) and haloacetic acids (HAA), and some forms of cancer. Effective in 2002, EPA's Stage 1 Disinfectant Byproduct Rule (DBR) requires water systems to meet THM and HAA MCLs of 80 ppb and 60 ppb, respectively. Compliance is determined by calculating the running annual averages of samples from all monitoring locations across the system. TTHM and HAA5 averages for the Huntington Beach water system have always been well below the MCLs. In 2006 EPA finalized Stage 2 of the regulation, which further controls allowable levels of DBPs in drinking water without compromising disinfection itself. Under the Stage 2 DBR, systems were required to conduct an evaluation of their distribution system to identify the locations with high THM and HAA concentrations. The City completed the evaluation in 2008, and submitted a Stage 2 monitoring plan for DDW review. Full Stage 2 compliance monitoring started in April 2012. The Stage 2 plan changed several of the locations previously monitored in the Stage 1 plan, and includes a few new sites. Under the Stage 2 DBR, compliance with the MCLs for THM and HAA are calculated for each monitoring location in the distribution system (locational running annual average), as opposed to the previous less stringent method of calculating running annual averages of samples from all monitoring locations across the system. The Stage 2 DBR was implemented in two phases. During Phase 1 of the implementation, the MCLs for THM and HAA were 80 ppb and 60 ppb, respectively, PSOMAS 3-5 October 2016 HB -603- Item 17. - 48 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 based on running system -wide annual averages at the current Phase 1 monitoring sites. The last Phase 1 monitoring was the First Quarter of 2012. During Phase 2, the compliance sites were changed based on the system -wide evaluation for high DBP sites and the locational annual MCL averages were 80 ppb for THM and 60 ppb for HAA. The Phase 2 monitoring began the Second Quarter of 2012, and locational annual averages for the Huntington Beach water system are continually below the MCLs. Hexavalent Chromium In July 2011, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) established a revised Public Health Goal (PHG) for hexavalent chromium at 0.02 ppb. The California Stat Division of Drinking Water (DDW) is required by California law to set a primary drinking water standard, MCL level, for hexavalent chromium and to set the MCL as close to the PHG as possible, taking into account technical feasibility (e.g., detectability and treatment) and costs. DDW set the new MCL for hexavalent chromium at 10 ppb, which became effective on July 1, 2014. In the early 2000s, the California Unregulated Chemical Monitoring Rule required water utilities to monitor hexavalent chromium, which has a detection limit of 1 ppb. The City's wells have been monitored since 2001 for hexavalent chromium and all readings have been below the 1-ppb detection limit ("Not Detected"). Under the third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation (UCMR3), the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) required large public water systems to conduct monitoring of 30 contaminants, including hexavalent chromium, for a one-year period between 2013 and 2015. The Minimum Reporting Limit (MRL) for hexavalent chromium under UCMR3 is 0.03 ppb. In 2014, each of the City's wells were sampled twice to comply with this requirement. All of these samples detected hexavalent chromium above the MRL, with results ranging between 0.05 and 0.51 ppb. These findings are still below the State detection limit of 1 ppb. EPA is still in the process of determining if a new federal standard for hexavalent chromium is warranted. 3.3 Groundwater Supply The City and other OCWD member agencies are charged the RA for groundwater produced from the Basin up to the BPP, and are charged an additional BEA for groundwater produced over this percentage. The BPP is uniform for all members and is set at 75% for 2016/17. In 2013, OCWD's Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 13-1-6 setting a goal of achieving and maintaining a 75 percent BPP and for the FY 2015 and 2016 has maintained this BPP even with a declining basin groundwater level. This has been possible in part by the increased recharge operations from the GWRS and other programs and projects being implemented by OCWD. 3.3.1 OCWD Projects OCWD has on -going and proposed projects to protect, clean, and refill/maintain the groundwater basin. PSOMAS 3-6 October 2016 Item 17. - 49 HB -604- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Talbert Seawater Intrusion Barrier Chapter 3 Since 1975, OCWD has operated a seawater barrier to keep seawater from migrating inland and mixing with and contaminating potable groundwater. OCWD's Fountain Valley Seawater Intrusion Barrier is a series of 28 injection wells running along Ellis Avenue from Euclid Street to Newland Street. A mixture of wastewater purified at Water Factory 21 in Fountain Valley and deep well water is pumped to the wells and injected into the ground to create an underground dam that blocks seawater from entering the groundwater basin. In 2007, OCWD completed a project to further protect the groundwater supply with an expansion of the seawater intrusion barrier by constructing a pipeline southerly from Ellis Street in the Southern California Edison property near Newland Street (Harper Park) and two additional injection wells. Groundwater Replenishment System The Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS), a joint project of OCWD and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), takes highly treated wastewater that would have previously been discharged into the Pacific Ocean and purifies it using a three -step process consisting of microfiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet light with hydrogen peroxide. Some of this highly treated water is used to fortify the seawater intrusion barrier and some is pumped to upstream areas of the Basin where it is recharged at strategic sites into the deep aquifers of the Basin, where it eventually becomes part of the potable groundwater supply. The treated water exceeds all federal and state drinking water standards and is near -distilled water that improves the overall quality of the groundwater basin by lowering the mineral content. This state-of-the-art water purification project, the largest of its kind in the world, originally had a capacity of 70 million gallons per day (mgd) resulting in about 72,000 AFY for recharge to the Basin. A treatment plant expansion of 30 million gallons per day was recently put on line by OCWD increasing the recharge capacity of the GWRS to 100 million gallons per day, and the treatment system is being laid out so that it could eventually be expanded to 130 million gallons per day. GWRS currently treats and recharges up to 100 million gallons per day of wastewater back into the Basin for future potable use. This equates to the recycling of over 110,000 AFY of wastewater back into the Basin for future extraction and potable use. 3.3.2 City Groundwater Production The capacity of the City's active potable wells is shown in Table 3-2 and the locations of these potable wells are shown on Figure 3-2. As shown on Table 3-2, the City has a total potable water well design capacity estimated at 25,300 gpm. However, many of the City's wells are not normally operated at 100% capacity in consideration of several factors including groundwater level, water quality, availability of in -lieu water, etc. The City prolongs the life of the wells and associated supply equipment when operating at less than capacity and the normal operating capacities. However, current normal PSOMAS 3-7 October 2016 HB -605- Item 17. - 50 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 operating capacity is near the maximum desirable operating threshold, and without any redundancy for well failures (See Section 3.3.9 for additional information). Table 3-2 Groundwater Well Production Capacities Year Drilled Well Depth (feet) Design Capacity (gpm) Well No. 3A 1994 660 2,500 Well No. 4 1967 804 500 Well No. 5 1969 820 4,000 Well No. 6 1973 810 3,300 Well No. 7 1975 891 4,000 Well No. 9 1981 996 3,000 Well No. 10 1981 960 4,000 Well No. 13 2002 830 4,000 Total Groundwater 25,300 Additionally, the City does not operate each well continuously over the course of a year (i.e. 24/7, 365 days a year). Each well is operated only about 6 to 7 months or about 50 to 60 % of total time to preserve the well and because during winter months demands are not high enough to pump all wells 100% of the time. PSOMAS 3-8 October 2016 Item 17. - 51 I1 B -606- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update .................................. .a.a a.»wa.azo»lays ai• 1� ows Impon ce.».u» - spiny0.l. - w.11 t111n.Nn. roe...enlwwr.q.»el e -.._ � W.II Mb f wNI11t0 Legend 0 City Boundary Zone 2 Boundary Reservoir I Booster Pump Station Groundwater Well Pressure Relief Valve ® Check Valve • Import Water Service Connection • Emergency Inter -Connection •••.•• OCWD Chloride (250 mg/L) Water Pipes By Diameter 4" - 6" 8" - 15" - 16" - 18" 20" - 24' - 26" - 42" 3 Figure 3-2 Locations of City Potable Groundwater Wells & Imported Water Turnouts with OCWD Chloride Limit P50MA5 3'A xB -607- Item 17. - 52 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 The City's 2015 UWMP assumed a 75% BPP as that was what was in effect in FY 2015/16 and was what OCWD staff was indicating was a conservative assumption for future long-range planning purposes. Based on 2015 water consumption adjusted for the drought conditions to a normal year consistent with the 2015 UWMP, and projected demand requirements for 2020 and 2040, the amount of water using a BPP percentage of 70% for water that could be withdrawn from the Basin without paying the BEA are as shown on Table 3-3. Table 3-3 Groundwater Production to BPP Supply (AFY) 2020 2040 Total Supply Requirement 28,090 30,396 GW Production to 75% BPP 19,663 21,277 3.3.3 Regional Imported Water Supply The City purchases supplemental treated imported water from MWDOC, which is a member agency of MWD. MWD imports raw water from northern California and the Colorado River, and then treats the majority of this water to potable standards at filtration plants located throughout southern California. MWD water from northern California as part of the State Water Project (SWP) is stored at Castaic Lake on the western side of the MWD service area and at Silverwood Lake near San Bernardino. MWD water imported from the Colorado River is stored at Lake Mathews in Riverside County. The Diamond Valley Reservoir in Riverside County near Hemet provides regional seasonal and emergency storage of SWP and Colorado River water. 3.3.4 Conjunctive Use Storage Program In 2003, MWD, MWDOC, and OCWD signed a 25-year agreement to store nearly twenty billion gallons of water in the Orange County Groundwater Basin for use during dry years and emergencies. The agreement also provides for additional protection from seawater intrusion and improved groundwater quality. Under the program, MWD, in cooperation with MWDOC and OCWD, will store more than 60,000 AF of imported water in the Basin during wet periods. During dry periods, droughts, or emergencies, up to 20,000 AFY will be withdrawn for use. The cost of the water supply will be equal to the full -service MWD imported water rate. Eight groundwater extraction wells were provided to city and local water district participants to ensure that the stored water can be pumped in addition to the normal pumped groundwater. The operating agencies are able to use MWD's new wells as backups for their existing systems and ownership of these wells will transfer to the participating agencies when the agreement expires. Participating agencies include the cities of Buena Park, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Orange, Santa Ana, and Westminster, plus Golden State Water Company, and Yorba Linda Water District. PSOMAS 3-10 October 2016 Item 17. - 53 HB -608- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 3.3.5 City Imported Water Supply The City receives treated imported potable water from two primary MWD sources. MWD's Jensen Filtration Plant, located in San Fernando Valley, receives only SWP water with no water received from the Colorado River. Jensen -treated water is delivered to the City via service connections OC-9 and OC-35. The City also receives treated imported potable water from the Diemer Filtration Plant, located just north of Yorba Linda. Typically, the Diemer Plant receives a blend of Colorado River water from Lake Mathews through the MWD lower feeder and SWP water through the Yorba Linda Feeder. At this time the blend is approximately a 50150 blend of the two sources. Diemer-treated water is delivered to the City via service connection OC-44. As mentioned above, imported water is delivered to the City via three service connections: OC-9, OC-35, and OC-44. The locations of these service connections or turnouts are shown on Figure 3-2. All three turnouts currently supply water directly to Zone 1. The City's allocated maximum capacities from these connections are shown in Table 3-4. OC-9 and OC-35 are both under the jurisdiction of the West Orange County Board (WOCWB), which normally require 24-hour advance notice to change delivery flows. Both service connections are located at the intersection of Dale and Katella Streets in the City of Stanton. Water from OC-9 enters the City system at the intersection of Newland Street and Edinger Avenue and water from OC-35 enters the City system at the intersection of Springdale and Glenwood Streets. Since the City is the majority owner of the WOCWB, the Public Works Department, Utilities Division is responsible for performing all operation and maintenance on the transmissions mains, and the City Utilities Manager acts as the General Manager for WOCWB. Huntington Beach owns 52.5% of WOCWB, with the City of Westminster at 25.4%, the City of Seal Beach at 14.3% and the City of Garden Grove at 7.8%. OC-44 is located on MWD's East County Feeder No. 2. MWD, who owns the primary meter, allows the City to take water from OC-44 on a demand basis, and does not require advance notice in order to change flow settings. Water is supplied to the City from OC-44 via a 24- to 42-inch transmission line owned jointly by the City (41.4%) and Mesa Water District (58.6%). A secondary joint metering station to measure flows to the City is located on Adams Avenue at the Santa Ana River, where the water enters the City system. PSOMAS 3-11 October 2016 HB -609- Item 17. - 54 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 Table 3-4 Imported Water Connections Allocated Capacity Zone Turnout Location Connection (gpm) Supplied (Location Entering City System) Dale & Katella Streets - Stanton OC-9 6,300 Zone 1 (Newland St. & Edinger Ave.) Dale & Katella Streets - Stanton OC-35 9,000 Zone 1 (Springdale & Glenwood Streets) East Orange County Feeder No. 2 OC-44 6,700 Zone 1 (Adams Ave. & Santa Ana River) Total 22,000 3.3.6 Seawater Desalination A third party private desalination company has been in the process of developing the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Project to be located adjacent to the AES Power Plant in the City along Pacific Coast Highway and Newland Street. The proposed project would produce up to 50 million gallons per day (56,000 AFY) of drinking water and will distribute water to coastal and south Orange County to provide approximately 8% of Orange County's water supply needs. The project supplies would be distributed to participating agencies through a combination of (1) direct deliveries through facilities including the East Orange County Feeder No. 2, the City of Huntington Beach's distribution system, and the WOCWB Feeder No. 2, and (2) water supply exchanges with agencies with no direct connection to facilities associated with the Project. In 2015, OCWD announced it would spearhead efforts to move this project forward and is currently working on options to purchase all the capacity and distribute it directly to agencies within its boundary as well as use a portion of the capacity for injection along its seawater barrier. However, until this project becomes a reality, the City is not counting on these supplies in its water planning. In following sections, contingent plans for capital improvements with or without this project will be discussed. 3.3.7 Emergency Connections The City has four emergency mutual -aid interconnections with adjacent water agencies including the City of Fountain Valley, City of Westminster, and Golden State Water Company (City of Seal Beach). The locations of these emergency interconnections are shown on Figure 4-1. Each of these agencies could provide Huntington Beach with limited water supply in the event of an emergency, if these supplies are available. Conversely, the City could provide emergency water to these cities, if available from either groundwater or imported water sources. Imported water is also supplied to Huntington Beach from OC-44 via a 24- to 42-inch transmission main jointly owned by the City and Mesa Water District. In an emergency the City could receive water from this source from Mesa Water District and vice versa. PSOMAS Item 17. - 55 3-12 October 2016 HB -610- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 3.3.8 Supply Reliability Available water supplies compared to demands determine one component of an agency's overall supply reliability. The City's ability to pull from different sources such as imported water from Metropolitan and groundwater provide a certain degree of reliability. Other local sources such as recycled water can also provide additional supply reliability. However, just because an agency has more supply than demand does not necessarily make the system reliable. For example, all of its supply could come from one source that might be susceptible to interruptions in service from droughts, earthquakes or other elements. The more different sources or sources with a high degree of reliability an agency has, the more reliable their supply will be. The City is fortunate to overly the Orange County Groundwater Basin (Basin), which has been able to sustain BPPs from the mid-60s to 70% throughout past years. During preparation of the City's 2015 UWMP, Orange County Water District who manages the Basin conservatively projected that a BPP of 75% could be maintained throughout the next twenty -plus years. This means that the City can reasonably count on at least 75% of its projected demands being met by local groundwater produced from City wells overlying the Basin. However, to be conservative, a BPP of 70% was assumed in the City's 2015 UWMP for calculation of available water supply under various hydrological scenarios. Imported water is less reliable in that Metropolitan's main sources are the State Water Project which is subject to climate patterns including drought and other environmental constraints and Colorado River which also has limitations. However, Metropolitan has projected in its long range water planning documents, including its 2015 UWMP and 2015 Integrated Water Resources Plan (IRP), that supplies will be sufficient to meet projected demands during normal, single dry and multiple dry years through the year 2040. Given the above, the ability of the City to reliably produce sufficient quantities of groundwater from the Basin and imported water from its available wells and turnout facilities, respectively, will be analyzed. Existing City wells with their year of construction, depths, pumping capacities and normal operating capacities are listed in Table 3-5. The reason the normal operating capacities are lower than those listed under the "Design Capacity" column is due to the fact that some of the City's wells are not operated at 100 percent capacity in consideration of several factors including groundwater level, water quality, availability of in -lieu water, etc. Additionally, the life of the wells and associated supply equipment can be prolonged when operating at less than capacity resulting in the normal operating supply values shown in Table 3-5. PSOMAS 3-13 October 2016 HB -611- Item 17. - 56 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 3-5 Well Capacities (Design & Normal Operating) Year Drilled Well Depth (feet) Design Capacity (gpm) Normal Operating Capacity (gpm) Well No. 3A 1994 660 2,500 2,000 Well No. 4 1967 804 500 300 Well No. 5 1969 820 4,000 2,500 Well No. 6 a 1973 810 3,300 1,500 Well No. 7 1975 891 4,000 3,000 Well No. 9 a 1981 996 3,000 1,500 Well No. 10 1981 960 4,000 3,300 Well No. 13 1 2002 830 4,000 2,500 Total Groundwater 25,300 16,600 (a) Well 6 & 9 operating capacity reduced to allow for sufficient blending with other sources in order to address higher level of dissolved Hydrogen Sulfide. 3 Imported water can be supplied directly into the City's Zone 1 via three turnouts, OC-9 at 6,300 gpm, OC-35 at 9,000 gpm, and OC-44 at 6,700 gpm, for a total imported supply availability of 22,000 gpm, as shown on Table 3-4. Determining the amount pumped from each of the City's supply facilities from month to month is fairly complex due to many variables. First, the City's demand fluctuates with higher demands in summer than winter. Additionally, the BPP typically varies to some degree from year to year based on weather and Basin conditions. And finally, in -lieu water is available from Metropolitan in certain years in certain months when surplus imported water is available (Metropolitan provides imported water in wet years at rates similar to groundwater costs to encourage use of surplus imported supplies and, in essence, increase levels in the Basin for use in dry years). Table 3-6 shows an actual operational scenario using FY 2014/15 data. Over that period the highest monthly average was October with a factor of 1.18 times average monthly demand and the lowest month was December with a factor of 0.81 times average. PSOMAS Item 17. - 57 3-14 October 2016 l-113-612- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 3-6 2014/15 Monthly Demand/Supply Projections (acre-feet) 3 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTAL AVERAGE Peaking Ratio 1.18 1.00 0.81 0.88 0.86 1.03 1.06 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.09 0.98 2014/15 Demand 2,540.5 2,154.6 1,740.8 1,895.9 1,848.5 2,211.9 2,282.8 2,183.1 2,207.3 2,225.4 2,340.9 2,112.4 25,744.1 2,145.3 Supply Source (Actual before Adjustments) Groundwater 1,377.3 1,169.6 907.0 974.4 957.8 1,370.3 1,788.8 1,293.2 1,351.2 1,333.9 1,528.4 1,537.4 15589.3 1,299.1 Imported 1,163.2 985.0 833.8 921.5 890.7 841.6 494.0 889.9 856.1 891.5 812.5 575.0 10:154.8 846.2 Actual Groundwater Pumped vs Operating Capacity Meadowlark #2 22.9 9.6 0.0 7.3 8.4 17.8 23.3 23.1 25.7 27.4 33.5 22.8 221.8 18.5 Well #3 224.9 254.1 241.1 74.7 0.0 103.0 249.2 27.3 9.4 54.9 4.0 248.0 1,490.6 124.2 Well #4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 12.5 33.2 45.5 41.3 41.0 193.5 16.1 Well #5 159.0 227.6 359.4 358.1 306.3 369.8 334.0 295.9 337.1 168.6 285.1 196.5 3,397.4 283.1 Well #6 31.0 226.1 42.3 170.8 236.4 303.8 130.7 1.5 6.1 8.0 15.8 32.0 1,204.5 100.4 Well #7 174.4 2.3 0.4 14.2 15.8 56.8 172.7 346.9 338.2 250.3 335.3 177.7 1,885.0 157.1 Well #9 159.7 42.6 1.3 1.0 3.1 1.2 68.0 49.9 113.1 62.0 170.2 220.6 892.7 74.4 Well #10 389.7 388.1 247.3 331.8 387.8 427.4 402.6 414.5 411.0 382.7 275.3 342.7 4,400.9 366.7 Well #13 215.7 19.2 15.2 16.5 0.0 90.5 388.3 121.6 77.4 334.5 367.9 256.1 1,902.9 158.6 Total GW Capacity 2273.8 2200.4 2273.8 2273.8 2053.7 2273.8 2200.4 2273.8 2200.4 2273.8 2273.8 2200.4 26,771.6 2,231.0 GW Surplus 896.5 1030.8 1366.8 1299.4 1095.9 903.5 411.6 980.6 849.2 939.9 745.4 663.0 11,182.3 931.9 Supply Source Adiusted (Via In -Lieu or CPTP) Groundwater 2,090.7 1,801.0 1,540.0 1,349.4 1,322.8 1,370.3 1,788.8 1,293.2 1,351.2 1,333.9 1,528.4 1,537.4 18,307.1 1,525.6 Imported 449.8 353.6 200.8 546.5 525.7 841.6 494.0 889.9 856.1 891.5 812.5 575.0 7,437.0 619.8 Groundwater (%) 82.29% 83.59% 88.47% 71.17% 71.56% 61.95% 78.36% 59.24% 61.22% 59.94% 65.29% 72.78% 71.11% Imported (%) 17.71% 16.41% 11.53% 28.83% 28.44% 38.05% 21.64% 40.76% 38.78% 40.06% 34.71% 27.22% 28.89% GW Surplus 183.1 399.4 733.8 924.4 730.9 903.5 411.6 980.6 849.2 939.9 1 745.4 663.0 8,464.5 705.4 Import Water Adjusted vs Operating Capacity Total I W Capacity 3,013.4 2,916.2 3,013.4 3,013.4 2,721.8 3,013.4 2,916.2 3,013.4 2,916.2 3,013.4 3,013.4 2,916.2 35,480.4 2,956.7 IW Surplus 2,563.6 2,562.6 2,812.6 2,466.9 2,196.1 2,171.8 2,422.2 2,123.5 2,060.1 2,121.9 2,200.9 2,341.2 28,043.4 2,337.0 Total Capacity and Surplus Capacity (After Adjustments) Total Capacity 1 5,287.2 1 5,116.6 5,287.2 1 5,287.2 1 4,775.5 5,287.2 5,116.6 5,287.2 5,116.6 5,287.2 5,287.2 5,116.E 1 62,252.0 1 5,187.7 Total Surplus 1 2,746.7 1 2,962.0 3,546.4 1 3,391.3 1 2,927.0 3,075.3 2,833.8 3,104.1 2,909.3 3,061.8 2,946.3 3,004.2 1 36,507.9 1 3,042.3 P'SOMAS 3-15 October 2016 Of CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 The second row in Table 3-6 shows the actual FY 2014/15 demand proportioned across each month based on the average factors for each month as discussed above. The next two rows show the monthly demand split between groundwater and imported water, before adjustments were made (such as in -lieu and/or Coastal Pumping Transfer Program). Meadowlark #2 in Table 3-6 is a private well maintained for the golf course, but production is included in City's annual BPP. It is understood that an exact BPP is not typically maintained each and every month but at the end of the year it is important to hit the BPP as close as possible since over pumping from the Basin results in Replenishment Assessments over and above normal groundwater pumping rates and taking more imported water is more expensive than groundwater pumped at or below the BPP. Table 3-6 does illustrate an important point. All the groundwater rows and columns show the normal operating pumping rates from Table 3-5 times the number of days in each month converted to acre-feet for each well and then a total for all of the eight wells. The "GW Surplus" row under "Supply Source Adjusted" is the difference between the total of all Well Operating Capacities minus the adjusted Groundwater Demand near the middle of the table. Table 3-6 shows that the total Surplus Groundwater Pumping Capacity for FY 2014/15 was 705.4 acre-feet, which appears to be substantial. However, in October and November the Surplus Groundwater Pumping Capacity is below 400 acre-feet for each month and for October is below 200 acre-feet. During that period, if a large capacity producing well, such as Well 7 or Well 10, were to be down for the month, the BPP could not be maintained in any of those months. If this were to occur, other wells could perhaps be pumped at higher rates to compensate during such an outage. Alternatively, more groundwater could be pumped in winter months when there is significantly more surplus to catch up with the BPP. However, this analysis does show that there is marginal surplus groundwater production capacity in certain times of the year. This becomes even more significant when you consider that Wells 4, 7, and 13 are all located in close proximity to one another at the Peck/Springdale Reservoir complex and in the area where higher chloride content exists in the Basin. This fact is illustrated on Figure 3-2 by comparing City well locations with the 250 mg/1 Chloride concentration lines as developed by OCWD from monitoring in recent years. If the City were to lose these three wells for a year with the FY 2014/15 demands and assuming the Normal Operating Pumping Capacities shown in Table 3-6, there would be an average deficit of 74.1 AF per month, or a deficit of around 889.4 AFY. A similar table was prepared using projected 2040 demands and that scenario is illustrated in Table 3-7. Granted these are demand projections some 25 years in the future but they show that there is a deficit of 266.2 AF in the month of October, with an average monthly surplus of only 331.2 AF per month. The demands, BPP, and monthly peaking can be easily modified in the Excel files created to generate Tables 3-6 and 3-7 to analyze differing scenarios and assess their impacts. Needless to say, as demands increase and with increases in the BPP, the City's groundwater pumping capacity becomes less and less reliable, especially in peak months. Additionally, in drier years the monthly demand distribution would be more extreme (i.e. higher summer peak use) than the average monthly distributions used in this analysis, further exacerbating this condition. If the City were to lose Wells 4, 7, and 13 for a year with the FY 2039/40 demands and assuming the Normal Operating Pumping Capacities shown in Table 3-7, there would be an average deficit of 448.3 AF per month, or a deficit of around 5,379.3 AFY. PSOMAS 3-16 October 2016 Item 17. - 59 HB -614- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 3-7 2040 Monthly Demand/Supply Projection (acre-feet) 3 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTAL AVERAGE Peaking Ratio 1.18 1.00 0.81 0.88 0.86 1.03 1.06 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.09 0.98 2039/40 Demand 2,999.6 2,543.9 2,055.4 2,238.5 2,182.5 2,611.6 2,695.3 2,577.6 2,606.2 2,627.5 2,763.9 2,494.1 30,396.0 2.533.0 Supply Source (Assume No Adjustments) Groundwater 2,540.0 2,182.6 1,850.2 1,680.1 1,645.4 1,751.7 2,190.5 1,668.3 1,731.4 1,716.6 1,933.7 1,906.6 22,797.0 1,899.8 Imported 459.6 361.3 205.2 558.4 537.2 859.9 504.8 909.3 874.7 910.9 830.2 587.5 7,599.0 633.3 Projected Groundwater Pumped vs Operating Capacity Meadowlark #2 22.9 9.6 0.0 7.3 8.4 17.8 23.3 23.1 25.7 27.4 33.5 22.8 221.8 18.5 Well #3 330.4 373.3 354.2 109.7 0.0 151.3 366.1 40.1 13.8 80.6 5.9 364.3 2,189.7 182.5 Well #4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 18.4 48.8 66.8 60.7 60.2 284.3 23.7 Well #5 233.6 334.3 528.0 526.1 450.0 543.2 490.7 434.7 495.2 247.7 418.8 288.7 4,990.9 415.9 Well #6 45.5 332.1 62.1 250.9 347.3 446.3 192.0 2.2 9.0 11.8 23.2 47.0 1,769.4 147.5 Well #7 256.2 3.4 0.6 20.9 23.2 83.4 253.7 509.6 496.8 367.7 492.6 261.0 2,769.1 230.8 Well #9 234.6 62.6 1.9 1.5 4.6 1.8 99.9 73.3 166.1 91.1 250.0 324.1 1,311.4 109.3 Well #10 572.5 570.1 363.3 487.4 569.7 627.9 591.4 608.9 603.8 562.2 404.4 503.4 6,465.0 538.8 Well #13 316.9 28.2 22.3 24.2 0.0 132.9 570.4 178.6 113.7 491.4 540.5 376.2 2,795.4 233.0 Total GW Capacity 2273.8 2200.4 2273.8 2273.8 2053.7 2273.8 2200.4 2273.8 2200.4 2273.8 2273.8 2200.4 26,771.6 2,231.0 GW Surplus -266.2 17.8 423.6 593.7 408.3 522.1 9.9 605.5 469.0 557.1 340.1 293.8 3,974.6 331.2 Projected Import Water vs Operating Capacity Total IW Capacity 3,013.4 2,916.2 3,013.4 3,013.4 2,721.8 3,013.4 2,916.2 3,013.4 2,916.2 3,013.4 3,013.4 2,916.2 35,480.4 2,956.7 IW Surplus 2,553.8 2,554.9 2,808.2 2,455.0 2,184.6 2,153.5 2,411.4 2,104.1 2,041.5 2,102.5 2,183.2 2,328.7 27,881.4 2,323.5 Total Capacity and Surplus Capacity (After Adiustments) Total Capacity 5,287.2 5,116.6 5,287.2 5,287.2 4,775.5 5,287.2 5,116.6 5,287.2 5,116.6 5,287.2 5,287.2 5,116.6 62,252.0 5,187.7 Total Surplus 2,287.6 2,572.7 3,231.8 3,048.7 2,593.0 2,675.6 2,421.3 2,709.6 2,510.5 2,659.6 2,523.3 2,622.5 31,856.0 2,654.7 O 3-17 October 2016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 3 These analyses do illustrate that the City has plenty of surplus imported water capacity even in the higher demand months based on the high volume of turnout capacity. The fact that the three turnouts are located at different points on the City distribution system is an added plus for imported water reliability. 3.3.9 Groundwater Well Study In conclusion, the City has lost two wells since the 2012 Water Master Plan, a clear indicator that the City should be prepared for a potential loss of one or more wells due to any number of factors. Table 3-8 below shows a history of wells going back to 1956 that have experienced limited capacities and have been abandoned and/or replaced. Illustrated on Table 3-9 and Figure 3-3 below, a total of 15 wells have been drilled since 1956, of which eight currently are still active, with seven being either inactive or destroyed. The average age of active wells compared to inactive wells is 36 years versus 30 years. Therefore, active wells have been operating, on average, 6 years beyond those that have failed. This is an important indicator that the City's operating water wells are nearing their useful lives and planning for future replacement is necessary and inevitable. The above findings indicate a high risk of a multi -year financial impact resulting from being unable to meet the BPP, especially in a scenario of sudden loss of a water well. This is compounded by the fact that it would take between 3 to 4 years to design and construct a new replacement well (or longer if a new well site must first be acquired). The financial impact would be the result of having to purchase a much costly imported water supply, as that can add an unanticipated operating cost of around $2.4 million if prolonged for one year, or nearly $10 million over the 4 years it could take to design and construct a new well. In other words, failure to meet BPP for 4 years is approximately equivalent to the design and construction cost of two new wells. A sample calculation of this financial impact is illustrated below, assuming no well down time for simplicity: Assumptions: Typical Water Well Production = 2,500 gpm or I IAF/Day or 4,032 AF/Yr Current Cost difference Between Imported & Groundwater = —$600/AF Minimum Cost of New Water Well = $5 million Financial Impact from Added Cost to the City: Daily Impact - $600/AF x 11 AF/Day = $6,600/Day Annual Impact - $600/AF x 4,032 AF/Yr = $2.4 million/Yr 4 Year Impact - 4 x $600/AF x 4,032 AF/Yr = $9.6 million/Yr Comparing Added Import Cost vs. New Water Wells: (4 Year Impact) / (Cost of New Well) = $9.6 million / $5 million = —2, or equivalent to 2 New Water Wells A separate well study should be completed to assess the condition of each of the City's existing wells, determine their remaining useful life, and develop a systematic approach to replacement of wells in their same general location and/or the addition of new wells at. PSOMAS 3-18 October 2016 Item 17. - 61 HB -616- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update 3 future locations. From the 2012 Water Master Plan, Well No. 1 was already identified to be separately evaluated regarding the feasibility of re -drilling it with its capacity increased to approximately 750 gpm or greater. The current year Capital Improvement Program included a project to address the presence of higher levels of dissolved Hydrogen Sulfide at Well No. 9, which is currently operating at a reduced capacity of 50 percent to accommodate required blending. The recommended well study would address the future need for and phasing of any additional wells and recommended locations for these wells. However, based on Table 3-6 and Table 3-7 above, new wells are already necessary to begin to restore losses in groundwater pumping capacity, and these wells are discussed in Chapter 7. Figure 3-3 Comparison of Active & Inactive Water Wells 70 Age of Active Wells Age of Non Active Wells 60 -- Average Age of Active Wells 50 -- Average Age of Non Active Wells L 40 a� } 30 DYKE I Well I Well I Well I Well I Well I Well I Well I Well I Well Well I Well I Well Well I Well No.I No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 No.8 No.9 No.1D No.11 No.3A No. 13 No. 12 PSOMAS 3-19 October 2016 HB -617- Item 17. - 62 '--r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update J 0 Table 3-8 Groundwater Wells History DESIGN Normal •" Above Operating Normal Normal Well Electric Motor Pumping Pump Speed Operating Operating Year Depth (EM) or Natural Capacity Pumping Speed Set by City Capacity Capacity Drilled Well Status (feet) Gas Engine (NG) (gpm) Head (feet) (RPM) (RPM) (GPM) (GPM) Comments No longer No longer belongs to City DYKE 1956 belongs to City i Out of service as of 2012 Well No. l 1962 Out of Service �; US _>Gn 1, i';'� - - Destroyed in 2001 Well No.2 1962 Abandoned %'7n - * 2,0! 'a5 J,7f,0 1,750 - - Destroyed in 1980 Well No. 3 1950 Abandoned - 4,000 11, t, 775 Well No. 4 1967 Active 804 NG 500 252 1,775 1,350 300 300 Well rehabilitation consisting of new pump and casing repair in Well No. 5 1969 Active 820 EM 4,000 1 263 1,775 1,666 2,500 2,500 2016 Production reduced by 55% of well capacity due to presence of Well No. 6 1973 Active 810 NG 3,300 330 1,190 900 1,500 22 500 hydrogen sulfide and color in the water Well No. 7 1975 Active 891 NG 4,000 300 1,200 1,100 3,000 3,000 Out of service as of 1980 due to presence of hydrogen sulfide Well No. 8 1978 Out of Service � n0n Information Not Avnilablc - - and color in the water Production reduced by 50% of well capacity due to presence of Well No. 9 1981 Active 996 NG 3,000 408 1,775 1,600 1,500 22 500 hydrogen sulfide Well No. 10 1981 Active 960 NG 4,000 308 1,775 1,670 3,300 3,300 Destroyed in 2003. Drilled but never put into service. Well No. it 1985 Abandoned bR Original design capacity reduced due to bottom 25 feet of well Well No. 3A 1994 Active 660 EM 2,500 406 1,785 1,680 2,000 2,000 1 cemented in 2015 Well No. 13 2002 Active 830 NG 4,000 308 11775 1,620 2,500 2,500 Destroyed in 2015 Well No. 12 2006 Abandoned 'Mn TOTAL GROUNDWATER 25,300 16,600 18,600 * These wells no longer in service. Figures shown are original design capacity. .. Well No. 6 & Well No. 9 can operate above normal capacity with acceptable level of lower aesthetic water quality due to presence of color and low level of odor from Hydrogen Sulfide PSOMAS 3-20 October 2016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 3-9 Comparison of Active & Inactive Water Wells Chapter 3 Well Name Age of Active Wells Age of Non Active Wells DYKE 60 VvIell No. 1 50 '~Nell No. 2 39 Well No. 3 30 Well No. 4 49 Well No..5 47 %Nell No. 6 43 Well No. 7 41 Well No. 8 2 Weil No. 9 35 Well No. 10 35 1.1ell No. 11 18 Well No. 3A 22 Weil No. 13 14 'Well No. 12 9 Average Years 36 30 No. of Wells 8 7 PSOMAS 3-21 October 2016 HB -619- Item 17. - 64 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 4 FACILITIES AND OPERATION 4.1 Existing Facilities Summary The City's existing potable water system facilities and pipelines are shown on Figure 4-1. The City's existing storage system consists of four reservoirs (Overmyer, Peck, Springdale and Edwards Hill), all located in the lower pressure zone (Zone 1), with a combined storage capacity of 55.0 million gallons (MG). The Peck and Springdale reservoirs are located at the same site. Booster stations are located at the three reservoir sites to pump water from the reservoirs into the distribution system. The City's service area is composed of two pressure zones: Zone 1 and Zone 2. Ground elevations in Zone 1 vary between 5 feet below and 80 feet above sea level. The Overmyer, Peck and Edwards Hill booster pump stations boost water from their respective reservoirs into the Zone 1 distribution system. Zone 2 is the 800 acre Reservoir Hill area that rises to an elevation of 109 feet. The Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station, which is located at the Overmyer site, boosts water from Zone 1 into Zone 2. The Edwards Hill Booster Pump Station also has Zone 2 pumps. Neither of the Zone 2 booster pump stations have a direct connection to pump from a storage reservoir. In addition to the four booster pump stations, the City's existing potable water distribution system includes eight currently active well facilities that pump directly into the distribution system (with the exception that Well 4 pumps directly into Peck Reservoir); three imported water service connections; four emergency water connections with neighboring public water systems; and 631 miles of transmission and distribution piping ranging in size from 4 inches to 42 inches in diameter. One City well, Meadowlark No. 2, is used solely for irrigation of the Meadowlark Golf Course and is not part of the potable water system. A separate, nonpotable water distribution system does not currently exist nor is one planned to be implemented in the near future. However, the potential for reducing demands on the potable water system through implementation of local projects such as capture and beneficial use of storm runoff for City landscape irrigation does exist and is discussed in Chapter 7. 4.2 System Operation Eight existing potable water wells (Well Nos. 3A, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13) can pump directly into the distribution system. Both Well No. 6 and 9 are currently operating at around 50 percent capacity due to the presence of higher levels of dissolved Hydrogen Sulfide. The wells are typically used to satisfy system demands during the day and to fill the four system reservoirs at night when system demands are lower. Item 17. - 65 4-1 October 2016 H B -620- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Legend [� City Boundary Zone 2 Boundary Reservoir f Booster Pump Station Groundwater Well Pressure Relief Valve ® Check Valve • Import Water Service Connection • Emergency Inter -Connection Water Pipes By Diameter 4 6" 8"-15' -- 16" - 18" 20" - 24" -26'-42' 4 w�a k R...rvolr 6 Zon• 1 BPS � WeS OC-]S M:y.POR Con-nlon w.nn tnacu».ww�� i a w.i ..._.- Figure 4-1 Existing Potable Water System Facilities PSOMAS 4-2 _ Item 17. - 66 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 The total combined well supply design capacity for the City, assuming all eight wells are operating at full design capacity would be approximately 25,300 gpm. However, due to the presence of Hydrogen Sulfide in some wells, as well as reduced production of aging wells, the current normal operating capacity of the eight wells total approximately 16,600 gpm, as described in Chapter 3. The pump at Well No. 5 has a constant speed motor. The pumps at the other well sites can be operated at variable speeds via natural gas engines or electrical motors and are generally operated to maintain constant flow. The Overmyer, Reservoir Hill, Peck, and Edwards Hill booster pump stations are controlled by system pressure at the respective complex. The lead pump at a station is activated to start when the system pressure drops to a specified level. Pumps are added or removed as necessary based on increased or decreased demand as sensed by an increase or decrease in system pressure. All of the pumps at the four booster pump stations can be operated at variable speeds. Edwards Hill booster station is a hybrid system, which can operate either by variable - frequency electric motors or variable speed natural-gas engines. Overmyer and Peck booster stations both only operate by variable speed natural-gas engines, but design is underway to rehabilitate Peck booster station to become a hybrid system. Reservoir Hill booster station only services Zone 2 and is primarily operated by variable speed natural- gas engines, with the exception of one small pump operated by variable -frequency electric motors. The Overmyer, Peck and Edwards Hill booster pump stations are operated to maintain constant discharge pressures, which correspond to a discharge hydraulic grade line (HGL) of approximately 180 feet for the Overmyer and Edwards Hill booster pump stations and 189 feet for the Peck Booster Pump Station. The Zone 2 Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station and the Zone 2 pumps at the Edwards Hill Booster Pump Station are operated to maintain a constant discharge pressure, which corresponds to a discharge HGL of approximately 230 feet. At each booster pump station, the lead pump is shut off when operating at its minimum speed and decreasing demand causes the pump discharge pressure to rise to the specified stop pressure and system pressure remains above this set point for a specified time. When the respective booster pump station is off-line, various pressure control valves automatically throttle to maintain system pressure by allowing system water to flow into the reservoirs. Imported water is supplied to the City via three service connections: OC-9, OC-35 and OC-44. The City's allocated capacities from these connections are 6,300 gpm, 9,000 gpm, and 6,700 gpm, respectively. OC-9 and OC-35 are operated on a fixed -flow basis with prior notification to MWD required in order to change flow settings. Flows from OC-44 can be changed without notifying MWD. All three connections supply water directly to Zone 1. System pressures throughout the City are generally maintained between 50 and 72 psi during normal operation. The tight range is attributable to the flat terrain of the City and PSOMAS 4-3 October 2016 Item 17. - 67 HB -622- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 to the utilization of variable -speed pump drives at the booster pump stations to maintain system pressures. 4.3 Storage Reservoirs and Booster Pump Stations The characteristics of the existing storage reservoirs are shown in Table 4-1. The storage capacities of the four existing reservoirs total 55.0 million gallons (MG). Table 4-1 Existing Storage Reservoir Characteristics Reservoir Location Dimensions (ft) Maximum Water Depth (ft) High Water Elevation (ft) Capacity (MG) Overmyer Zone 1 441 x 198 48.5 71.8 20.0 Edwards Hill Zone 1 213 dia. 34.0 84.0 9.0 Springdale Zone 1 448 x 143 24.0 35.5 9.0 Peck Zone 1 541 x 210 23.5 33.7 17.0 Total 55.0 The characteristics of the existing booster pump stations are shown in Table 4-2. A 10- MG storage reservoir and 11,000-gpm booster pump station was included in the 2000 Master Plan at the AES property in the southeast quadrant of the City to provide storage and supply to the area south of the Newport -Inglewood fault and east of Bolsa Chica. In 2005, the City purchased the future tank property from AES Huntington Beach Development, LLC. This reservoir and booster pump station, which are still included as a water master plan project in this water master plan, are discussed in Chapters 5 and 7. 4.3.1 Overmyer Reservoir and Booster Pump Station The Overmyer Reservoir and the associated booster pump station are located at the City's Utilities Division Yard. The reservoir, which was constructed in 1971, was formed by excavating into natural soils and constructing an embankment of the excavated material. The vertical walls are 25 feet high and the 1.5:1 sloping sides are 22 feet high. The reservoir was rehabilitated in 2003/04, in accordance with the 1995 Water Master Plan. The work included strengthening the wall footing, installation of a new concrete wall liner, construction of a new roof structure with new roof support columns and column base plates, and construction of gunite floors and slopes. In conjunction with the reservoir rehabilitation, a new booster pump station was also constructed. The pumping capacity of the Overmyer Booster Pump Station is 20,000 gpm with all four pumps in operation and 13,500 gpm with one of the largest pumps (6,500 gpm) out of service (acting in stand-by as a backup). The pump station is operated to maintain a PSOMAS 4-4 October 2016 HB -623- Item 17. - 68 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 constant discharge pressure, which corresponds to a discharge hydraulic grade line (HGL) of 180 feet. All four pumps have variable -speed operation via natural-gas engines. Two 3,900-gallon liquefied propane gas (LPG) tanks and associated equipment are located at the site to provide backup propane gas supply for operation of the Overmyer and Reservoir Hill booster pumps. Table 4-2 Existing Booster Station Characteristics Electric Motor (EM) or N Natural Gas Engine Drive r .,�n�:.: (NG) Pump;Design Point ;Zone. Horse Flow HGL Stat�ortt,.Pump=; Speed Power Type (gpm) (ft) RPM 1 Zone 1 Variable 409 NG 6,500 160 1,160 2 Zone 1 Variable 409 NG 6,500 160 1,160 Overmyer' 3 Zone 1 Variable 150 NG 3,500 115 1,190 4 Zone 1 Variable 150 NG 3,500 130 1,160 20,000d Reservoir Hill 1 Zone 2 Variable 10 EM 400 52 1,770 2 Zone 2 Variable 25 NG 1,500 114 1,180 3 Zone 2 Variable 25 NG 1,500 114 1,180 4 Zone 2 Variable 75 NG 3,500 51 1,160 5 Zone 2 Variable 75 NG 3,500 51 1,160 10,400d Peck 1-4 Zone 1 Variable 330 NGf 4,635 189 1,200 18,5401 Edwards Hill 1-4 Zone 1 Variable 150 Dual` 2,500 160 1,780 ---------------------- ---------------------------------- ---------- --------- 7,500e ----------- ---------- ------------- Edwards Hill 5-7 Zone 2 Variable 25/45b Dual` 1,250 52 1,760 3,750d (a) The Overmyer Zone 1 Pumps can also be used to pump to Zone 2 in an emergency. (b) The motors are 25 hp and the engines are 45 hp. (c) The pumps can be driven either by natural gas combustion engines with variable speed, right angle gear drives or by variable frequency electric motors. (d) The total capacity includes all zone pumps in the station; however, see text description for each station to determine rated capacity, which is capacity with the largest pumping unit out of service. (e) Edwards Hill Zone 1 station actually includes four 2,500 gpm pumps but only three can be used at a time due to current piping restrictions; thus 7,500 gpm is total capacity, which is same as rated capacity. (f) Design is underway to rehabilitate the Peck booster station to become a hybrid system, by providing the capability to operate the station with variable -frequency electric motors. PSOMAS 4-5 October 2016 Item 17. - 69 HB -624- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 4.3.2 Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station The Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station is located on the same site as the Overmyer Reservoir and Booster Pump Station. The pump station boosts water from Zone 1 to the 800-acre Reservoir Hill area that constitutes Zone 2 of the water system. Zone 2 has a high ground elevation of 109 feet. The booster pump station has a pumping capacity of 10,400 gpm with all five pumps in operation and 6,900 gpm with the largest pump (3,500 gpm) out of service. Pump No. 1 is driven with a variable frequency electric motor. The other four pumps (Pump Nos. 2 through 5) have variable -speed operation via a natural- gas engine. The pump station is operated to maintain a constant discharge pressure, which corresponds to a discharge HGL of approximately 230 feet. 4.3.3 Peck and Springdale Reservoirs and Peck Booster Pump Station The 17.0 MG Peck Reservoir, the 9.0 MG Springdale Reservoir and the Peck Booster Pump Station are located at the same site, west of Springdale Street at the northern end of the City. Well Nos. 4, 7, and 13 are also located at this site. The Peck Reservoir was constructed in 1966. In 1995, the reservoir was rehabilitated with seismic upgrades and a new booster pump station was constructed. The Springdale Reservoir was constructed in 2003, in accordance with the 2000 Water Master Plan. Both reservoirs are above -ground, concrete, rectangular reservoirs with the dimensions shown in Table 4-1. The Peck Booster Pump Station boosts water from both the Peck Reservoir and the Springdale Reservoir into the Zone 1 distribution system. The pump station is operated to maintain a constant discharge pressure, which corresponds to a discharge HGL of approximately 189 feet. The pumping capacity of the Peck Booster Pump Station is 18,540 gpm with all four pumps in operation and 13,905 gpm with one pump out of service. Pump Nos. 1 through 4, each rated at 4,635 gpm, have variable -speed operation via natural-gas engines. A 10,000-gallon LPG tank and associated equipment are located at the site to provide backup propane gas supply for operation of the engine -driven booster pumps and the engine -driven pumps at Well Nos. 4, 7 and 13. Design is underway to rehabilitate the Peck booster station to become a hybrid system, by providing the capability to operate the station with variable -frequency electric motors. 4.3.4 Edwards Hill Reservoir and Booster Pump Station The 9.0 MG Edwards Hill Reservoir and Booster Pump Station are located at the corner of Edwards Street and Overlook Drive. The reservoir and pump station were constructed in 2001. The pre -stressed -concrete, circular reservoir is above -ground, with the dimensions shown in Table 4-1. The Edwards Hill Reservoir Pump Station houses both Zone 1 and Zone 2 pumps. In 2001, the Zone 1 pumping system was upgraded with larger capacity pumping assemblies, variable frequency motors and natural gas engines. While the size of each new pump nearly doubled, from 1,500 gpm to 2,500 gpm, no improvements to the suction or discharge piping were made. Therefore, only three of the four pumps can PSOMAS 4-6 October 2016 HB -625- Item 17. - 70 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 operate at a time due to piping restrictions and total capacity is limited to 7,500 gpm (3 x 2,500), up from the 6,000 gpm previous total capacity (4 x 1,500). However, the reliability was greatly improved as the rated capacity (one pump out of service) is now 7,500 gpm vs. the previous rated capacity of only 4,500 gpm (3 x 1,500). The Zone 1 pumps are operated to maintain a constant discharge pressure, which corresponds to a discharge HGL of approximately 180 feet. The pumping capacity of the Zone 2 pumps is 3,750 gpm with all three pumps in operation and 2,500 gpm with one of the three 1,250- gpm pumps out of service. The Zone 2 pumps are operated to maintain a constant discharge pressure, which corresponds to a discharge HGL of approximately 230 feet. All of the pumps (Zone 1 and Zone 2) have variable speed operation via dual drives, i.e. either a variable -frequency motor or a natural-gas engine. A 2,000-gallon LPG tank and associated equipment are located at the site to provide backup propane gas supply for operation of the engine driven pumps. 4.4 Potable Water Well Pumps The characteristics of the existing potable water well pumps and corresponding drives are shown in Table 4-3. The pumps at Well Nos. 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13 can be operated at variable speeds via natural gas engines and are generally operated to maintain constant flow. The pump at Well No. 5 is driven by a constant -speed electric motor. Table 4-3 Existing Potable Water Well Pump Characteristics Electric Motor (EM) or Natural Gas Engine (NG) Pump Design Point Flow HGL Well Speed Horsepower Type (gpm) (ft) RPM Well No. 3A Variable 350 EM 2,500 406 1,785 Well No. 4 Variable 49 NG 500 252 1,775 Well No. 5 Constant 400 EM 4,000 263 1,775 Well No. 6 Variable 395 NG 3,300 330 1,190 Well No. 7 Variable 409 NG 4,000 300 1,200 Well No. 9 Variable 338 NG 3,000 408 1,775 Well No. 10a Variable 395 NG 4,000 308 1,775 Well No. 13 Variable 330 NG 4,000 308 1,775 (a) In 2011, Well 10 was retrofitted with improvements designed such that the addition of an EM and VFD will be facilitated easily in the future. PSOMAS 4-7 October 2016 Item 17. - 71 HB -626- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 A 10,000-gallon LPG tank and associated equipment provide backup propane gas supply for operation of the engine -driven pumps at Well Nos. 4, 7, and 13, and the engine -driven pumps at the Peck Booster Pump Station. In accordance with the 1995 Water Master Plan recommendations to provide energy back-up at well sites, the City purchased a portable trailer -mounted 500 gallon propane storage vessel in 2010 and constructed vaporizers at Well Site Nos. 6, 9, and 10. 4.5 Transmission and Distribution Piping As shown in Table 4-4, to Table 4-7, there is a sum total of approximately 631 miles of transmission and distribution piping in the water system with sizes ranging from 4- to 42- inches in diameter. The majority of the piping in the system is 6 to 8 inches in diameter (72.2%) and the most common material is asbestos cement (AC) pipe (74.0%). Figure 4-1 shows these different pipe diameters and Figure 4-2 shows these different pipe materials with the City's system graphically. PSOMAS 4-8 October 2016 HB -627- Item 17. - 72 CD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 J w Table 4-4 Distribution Mains Owned By the City Length (feet) - Total Owned By the City Excluding Transmission Mains and Shared Ownership with WOCWB and Mesa Water District Pipe Diameter (inches) a Asbestos Cement Copper Ductile Iron PE & HDPE HDPE PE PVC STL & STL CYL STL STL CYL STL CYL CM/L Unknown Total 4 34,332 8 173 165 129 36 6,937 468 468 0 60 14,319 57,230 6 928,013 0 883 0 0 0 35,946 213 0 213 15 121,795 1,087,501 8 1,064,346 0 1,642 0 0 0 243,560 1,751 203 1,548 73 7,356 1,318,728 10 39,935 0 0 0 0 0 12,410 92 0 92 122 3,068 55,627 12 363,235 0 2,212 0 0 1 0 126,013 1,535 217 1,318 2,158 639 495,792 14 9,590 0 0 216 216 0 198 2,052 0 2,052 214 2 12,272 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,390 0 3,390 16 26,631 0 0 0 0 0 16,226 0 0 0 14,014 123 56,994 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,299 871 0 871 237 0 9,407 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,531 16,702 0 16,702 4,027 46 30,307 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 352 0 352 0 0 352 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24 1,343 0 0 0 0 0 7,074 584 0 584 426 0 9,427 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 0 564 0 577 Total (Feet) 2,467,426 8 4,910 381 345 36 466,195 24,633 902 23,731 25,301 147,346 3,137,604 Total (Miles) 467.3 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 88.3 4.7 0.2 4.5 4.8 27.9 1 594.2 Pct. 78.6% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.9% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 4.7% 1 100.0% a) Total count of pipes 4-inch and greater as of February 11, 2016. WWK �M 4-9 October 2016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 4-5 OC-9 Transmission Main 4 Length (feet) - OC-9 City Soley Owned Transmission Main Pipe Diameter (inches) a Asbestos Cement Copper Ductile Iron PE & HDPE HDPE PE PVC STL & STL CYL STL STL CYL STL CYL CM/L Unknown Total 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 28 20 0 0 0 5,087 5,087 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 5,187 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,445 0 16,445 24 1 0 1 0 1 7,641 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 2,957 0 0 0 0 2,361 12,958 Total (Feet) 0 0 7,641 5,087 5,087 0 3,057 0 0 0 16,473 2,361 34,618 Total (Miles) 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.4 6.6 Length (feet) - OC-9 City Share Through WOCWB Feeder 1 Transmission Main Pipe Diameter (inches) a Asbestos Cement Copper Ductile Iron PE & HDPE HDPE PE PVC STL & STL CYL STL STL CYL STL CYL CM/L Unknown Total 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,689 534 11,223 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,731 0 8,731 28 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 8,169 1 0 8,169 Total (Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,590 534 28,124 Total (Miles) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.1 5.3 a) Total count of pipes for OC-9 as of February 11, 2016. h--r CD J PSOMAS 4-10 J October 2016 CD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 J WN 7. w 0 Table 4-6 OC-35 Transmission Main Length (feet) - OC-35 City Soley Owned Transmission Main Pipe Diameter (inches) a Asbestos Cement Copper Ductile Iron PE & HDPE HDPE PE PVC STL & STL CYL STL STL CYL STL CYL CM/L Unknown Total 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 68 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 264 264 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,822 0 12,822 180 1 13,003 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,774 0 3,774 16,670 0 20,443 Total (Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,596 0 16,596 16,850 334 33,780 Total (Miles) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 3.1 3.2 0.1 6.4 Length (feet) - OC-35 City Share Through WOCWB Feeder 2 Transmission Main Pipe Diameter (inches) a Asbestos Cement Copper Ductile Iron PE & HDPE HDPE PE PVC STL & STL CYL STL STL CYL STL CYL CM/L Unknown Total 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 5,706 0 5,731 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,199 0 12,199 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,491 0 13,491 Total (Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 25 31,396 0 31,421 Total (Miles) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 6.0 a) Total count of pipes for OC-35 as of February 11, 2016. P'SOMAS 4-11 October 2016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 4-7 OC-44 Transmission Main Chapter 4 Length (feet) - OC-44 City Soley Owned Transmission Main Pipe Diameter (inches) a Asbestos Cement Copper Ductile Iron PE & HDPE HDPE PE PVC STL & STL CYL STL STL CYL STL CYL CM/L Unknown Total 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 72 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,014 1,014 30 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2,413 0 2,413 15,809 0 18,222 Total (Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,413 0 2,413 15,809 1,108 19,330 Total (Miles) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.2 3.7 Length (feet) - OC-44 Shared Through Mesa Water District Transmission Main Pipe Diameter (inches) a Asbestos Cement Copper Ductile Iron PE & HDPE HDPE PE PVC STL & STL CYL STL STL CYL STL CYL CM/L Unknown Total 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,064 0 0 0 13,064 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,556 0 0 0 3,556 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,675 0 0 0 3,675 42 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 26,197 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 26,197 Total (Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46,492 0 0 0 46,492 Total (Miles) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 a) Total count of pipes for OC-44 as of February 11, 2016. PSOMAS 4-12 J CT October 2016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Legend 0 City Boundary Zone 2 Boundary Reservoir / Booster Pump Station Groundwater Well Pressure Relief Valve ® Check Valve • Import Water Service Connection • Emergency Inter -Connection Water Pipes By Material - Asbestos Cement - Cast Iron - Copper - Ductile Ima - High Density Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyvinyl Chloride - Steel Steel Cylinder Steel Cylinder Cement Lined - Unknown 4 Figure 4-2 Transmission and Distribution Piping by Material 4-13 October 2016 Item 17. - 77 Hs -632- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 The transmission mains constitute the majority of the steel pipe in the system. Water transmission pipelines associated with the three imported water service connections are vital to transmit water throughout the City and to all water storage facilities. Corrosion protection of the 30-inch, 36-inch, and 42-inch pipelines was originally included in the 1995 Water Master Plan, all of which have been completely retrofitted with corrosion protection systems. However, the vital transmission mains upstream of the City's three imported water service connections that are either jointly owned with the West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) or Mesa Water District have not been installed with any corrosion protection systems. Therefore, separate feasibility and implementation studies are necessary to begin the process of installing similar corrosion protection systems on these vital transmission mains. The 36-inch to 42-inch OC-35 transmission main begins at a connection with the WOCWB Feeder No. 2 connection at Glenwood Drive/Springdale Street and runs south on Springdale Street and Edwards Street, then east on Clay Street to a connection with the OC-44 transmission main at Huntington Street, which is near to the Overmyer facilities. A non -rectified corrosion protection system was recently installed in 2009 for this 42-inch transmission pipeline that included insulating fittings/test stations and all necessary appurtenances, including replacement of valves for the 42-inch coal -tar enamel coated steel water main. The 36-inch mortar coated steel water main underwent similar cathodic protection improvements in around 2013, including an impressed current rectifier corrosion protection system with necessary appurtenances. The 30-inch transmission main begins at the jointly owned OC-44 service connection with Mesa Consolidated Water District at Adams Avenue and the Santa Ana River and runs west on Adams Street, north on Brookhurst Street, west on Yorktown Avenue, then north on Huntington Street to a connection with the 42-inch transmission main in Clay Street. An impressed current rectifier corrosion protection system was installed in 2012 for this transmission pipeline that included insulating fittings/test stations, an all necessary appurtenances, including replacement of valves for the 30-inch coal -tar enamel coated steel water main. In accordance with the 1995 Water Master Plan, beginning at the WOCWB Feeder No. 1 connection at Edinger Avenue and Newland Street, a new 20-inch to 24-inch transmission main was constructed in 2007, running south on Newland Street to a connection with the OC-44 transmission main in Yorktown Avenue. The new transmission main is primarily ductile iron pipe, with some segments being Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), and was installed with a non -rectified corrosion protection system. In 2011, the remaining 2.5 miles of the original 21-inch OC-9 coal -tar enamel coated steel transmission main was extensively re-evaluated by a corrosion specialist. Their finding was extremely favorable in that the transmission main was found to be in very good condition. Another transmission main in the system is the Downtown Loop that transmits water around and through the Downtown area. The 20-inch steel transmission main has an impressed current rectifier system for corrosion protection that was retro-fitted in 2007. PSOMAS 4-14 October 2016 HB -633- Item 17. - 78 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 The 20-inch steel transmission main connects with the 30-inch OC-44 transmission main at Yorktown Avenue/Huntington Street and runs west on Yorktown Avenue, then south on Lake Street, then west on Olive Street through Downtown, then north on Goldenwest Street to a connection with the 42-inch OC-35 transmission main on Clay Street. Table 4- 8 is a summary of pipes with Cathodic Protection. Table 4-8 Pipes with Cathodic Protection Pipe Diameter (inches) a Feet 4 468 6 653 8 938 12 1,780 14 2,048 20 24,796 24 8,042 30 18,204 42 11,077 Total (Feet) 68,006 Total (Miles) 12.9 a) Total count of pipes 4-inch and greater as of February 11, 2016. The remaining distribution system is a well-gridded system with the majority of the arterial grids composed of 12-inch or larger diameter Asbestos Cement (AC) pipe. Originally, only 1% of the piping in the system consisted of cast iron (35,000 linear feet). However, even this small amount is significant because unlined and uncoated cast iron pipe is prone to severe interior and exterior corrosion, respectively. Unlined cast iron pipe loses much of its original carrying capacity with age due to interior pipeline tuberculation. This is especially true for small diameter pipe. Up until 2005, there was a substantial amount of cast iron pipe in the City's distribution system, the majority of which was 8 inches in diameter or smaller. Some of this pipe dated back 75 to 100 years based on City records. In accordance with the 2000 Water Master Plan, the City undertook an aggressive cast iron main replacement program and essentially all cast iron pipes have been replaced in the Downtown area. 4.6 Other Distribution Appurtenances & Essentials 4.6.1 Metered Service Connections The distribution system has 53,091 metered service connections. The majority of the metered services, 92.8% of total metered connections are 3/4" to 1" in diameter (largely PS O M A S Item 17. - 79 4-15 October 2016 HB -634- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 for single family residences). The City is in the process of upgrading water meters from touch read to advance metering infrastructure (AMI). Touch read meters require a meter reader to only touch the top of the meter box with a sensor in order to read the meter. AMI meters send out a radio signal that provides not only the amount of water used by a customer, but also when the customer is using water. This infrastructure allows the City to analyze data on customer's water consumption patterns, to better understand water demand, and can also be used locate leaky water services. Table 4-9 Meter Connections Meter Size (Inch) Number of Meter Connections Pct. 3/4 40820 76.89% 1 8447 15.91% 1-1/2 1492 2.81% 2 2053 3.87% 3 136 0.26% 4 compound 83 0.16% 4 FM 1 0.00% 6 compound 24 0.05% 6 FM 14 0.03% 8 FM 17 0.03% 10 FM 4 0.01% Total 53,091 100.00% a) Total count of meters as of February 10, 2016. 4.6.2 Large Valves The distribution system has 17,749 valves, the majority of which are 4-inch in diameter and larger. Distribution system valves allow maintenance personnel to isolate discrete portions of the water system to perform repairs or to clean segments of the system. Water pipeline systems are cleaned by unidirectional flushing of water mains. Additionally, distribution system valves require periodic maintenance by exercising the valves. Exercising valves is simply closing and opening the valves, so that valves don't become in -operable in one position. PSOMAS 4-16 October 2016 Hs -635- Item 17. - 80 0 J OR o, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 4-10 Distribution Valves (Not Including Small Diameter Service Valves) Chapter 4 Valve Type (All Valves Owned by the City or Share Ownership with Other Agencies) a Valve Diameter (inches) Line Valve Fire Service Valve Meter Valve Air Vac Valve Pump Out Valve Inter- connect Valve Blow Off Valve Backflow Valve Hydrant Valve Line Stop Unkown Total Unknown 98 2 6 2 6 1 8 0 24 7 1 155 1 1 0 1 16 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 19 2 7 2 8 262 0.00 0.00 822.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1,102 3 1 6 0 10 3 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 19 4 189 186 198 73 86.00 0.00 234.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 971 6 2,891 602 60 0 63 19 8 2 5,720 0 1 9,366 8 4,041 151 1 17 1 84 22 1 12 3 45 0 0 4,376 10 161 22 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 188 12 1,198 4 2 0 1 41 0 0 1 6 0 1,253 14 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 18 31 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32 20 35 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 36 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 25 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 36 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 42 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Total 8,888 969 305 357 240 88 1,085 6 5,795 14 2 17,749 Pct. 50.1% 5.5% 1.7% 2.0% 1.4% 0.5% 6.1% 0.0% 32.6% 0.1% 0.0% 100.0% a) Total count of valves as of February 10, 2016. PSOMAS 4-17 October 2016 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 4.6.3 Public and Private Fire Hydrants The City distribution system has 5,801 public fire hydrants and 731 private fire hydrants. Similar to valves, fire hydrants need to be exercised periodically. Distribution system flushing exercises valves, hydrants, and also cleans distribution mains. Unfortunately flushing is a maintenance tool that is not good practice during times of drought, as is currently the case. Fire hydrants also need to be painted on a regular basis to prevent corrosion. Table 4-11 Public and Private Fire Hydrants Type Number of Fire Hydrants Pct. Public Fire Hydrants 5,801 88.8% Private Fire Hydrants (Estimated) 731 11.2% Total 6,532 a) Total count of hydrants as of February 11, 2016. 4.6.4 Dedicated Fire Services The City has approximately 646 fire services with either a Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) or a Reduced Pressure Detector Assembly (RPDA). The DCDAs and RPDAs allow only unidirectional flow from the distribution system to the fire services, and thus they protect the distribution system from back siphon events or from contamination from fire protection systems. In accordance with California State law, all of the DCDAs and RPDAs require annual testing, paid for by property owners. The property owner is also responsible for the cost of installing and maintaining the backflow devices. The City's Cross Connection Control Specialists insure compliance with State law and protect the integrity of the distribution system. PSOMAS 4-18 October 2016 HB -637- Item 17. - 82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 4-12 Dedicated Fire Services with Backflow Devices Fire Services with Backflow Devices Valve Diameter (inches) w/ Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) w/ Reduced Pressure Detector Assembly (RPDA) Total Fire Services 2.5 10 1 11 3 21 0 21 4 138 6 144 6 289 4 293 8 143 3 146 10 28 2 30 12 1 1 1 0 1 Total 630 16 646 Pct. 97.5% 2.5% 100.0% a) Total count of fire services as of April 27, 2016. 4.6.5 Water System Personnel, Utilities Yard, Trucks, Equipment, etc. ter 4 The City employs approximately 75 full-time equivalent personnel, to operate, maintain, repair, design, and renew the water system facilities. The City has a 7.2 acre utilities yard, complete with administration buildings, warehouse, materials and equipment storage, and workshops for maintenance of water facilities. The Water Utility has approximately fifty light duty service trucks, seven dump trucks, five backhoes, one boom truck, one water truck, one fluoride tanker, one ditch witch, and one skid steer. Operations and maintenance personnel are on call and available on an emergency basis to respond to emergency situations and provide high quality uninterrupted water service to the residents of the City's water service area. 4.7 Distribution System Treatment Gaseous chlorine (CL2) is injected at all of the well sites to disinfect the water. The City receives imported water that has been disinfected by MWD by means of chloramination. The City disinfects at each of its well sites through the injection of gaseous chlorine (CL2) typically at a rate of about 1.0 milligram per liter (mg/1) residual, while the imported water disinfected by chloramination, is typically at a rate of about 2.2 mg/l residual. In accordance with the 1995 Water Master Plan, chlorination facilities at Well Site Nos. 6, 7, 9 and 10 were all upgraded by 2002. The upgrades included room modifications, some building construction, and the installation of secondary containment vessels with CL2 leak monitors and earthquake sensors. In accordance with the 2000 Water Master Plan, similar chlorination upgrades were constructed at Well No. 13 and completed by 2010. PSOMAS Item 17. - 83 4-19 October 2016 HB -638- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 4 The City has fluoridated its water supply since 1972. The natural fluoride concentration of the groundwater ranges from 0.3 to 0.4 mg/l, and the City increases the fluoride concentration to between 0.70 and 1.30 mg/l. The natural fluoride concentration of the imported water supply has a fluoride content of 0.2 mg/l, and MWD increase the fluoride concentration to 1. 0 mg/l. 4.8 Water Infrastructure Replacement Costs As described above, many costly components of the water system infrastructure are necessary to deliver water to City's customers. Table 4-13 shows an estimated total capital cost of over $1.4 billion. This is the estimated cost if the entire water system was built today. This infrastructure will age and various components have different useful lives, typically ranging from 5 to 100 years. Therefore, in order to maintain a reliable water system infrastructure, the City's rate structure needs to be financially sustainable into the future by having the ability to plan for rehabilitation and/or replacement of aging infrastructure, consistent with standard asset management practices. Table 4-13 Water System Infrastructure Replacement Cost (Uninflated) Water Infrastructure Replacement Cost in Description Millions (Uninflated) Pct. 4 Reservoirs / Tank 3 Zone 1 Booster Stations 2 Zone II Booster Stations $110 7.67% 10 Water Wells (8 Currently Active) $50 3.49% 611 Miles of Distribution Mains $900 62.76% 20 Miles of Shared Transmission Mains $80 5.58% 3 Import Water Connections $5 0.35% 5,800 Public Fire Hydrants $29 2.02% 17,749 Large Valves $20 1.39% 53,091 Metered Connections $220 15.34% Utilities Yard, Trucks, Equipment, etc. $20 1.39% Total $1,434 100.00% PSOMAS 4-20 October 2016 H B -6; 9- Item 17. - 84 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update 5 STORAGE AND EMERGENCY SUPPLY 5.1 Overview 5 Storage is required in a water system to balance variations in demand above and below normal supply settings (operational storage), to provide water for fighting fires (fire storage), and to provide water when normal supplies are reduced or unavailable due to unusual circumstances (emergency storage). The City currently has 55.0 million gallons (MG) of storage capacity located at the Overmyer, Peck, Springdale, and Edwards Hill storage reservoirs as shown in Table 5-1. Booster stations are located at the Overmyer, Peck/Springdale, and Edwards Hill sites to pump water from the reservoirs into the Zone I distribution system at appropriate pressures. The Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station, which is located at the Overmyer site, boosts water from Zone I into Zone 2, which does not have the capability to directly pump from a storage reservoir. In addition to Zone 1 pumps, the Edwards Hill Booster Pump Station also houses pumps to boost water from Zone I into Zone 2. Table 5-1 Existing and Proposed Reservoir Capacities �Capacity�� Reservoir Location (MG) Existing Overmyer Zone 1 20.0 Edwards Hill Zone 1 9.0 Springdale Zone 1 9.0 Peck Zone 1 17.0 Subtotal Existing 55.0 Proposed Southeast (with 11,000 gpm booster pump station) Zone 1 10.0 TOTAL 65.0 As shown in Figure 5-1, the Newport -Inglewood Fault runs through the City. Currently there are no sources of supply and no storage reservoirs south of the fault. Water is supplied to the south from supply sources north of the fault. An earthquake on this fault could potentially sever water transmission and distribution pipelines crossing the fault and leave the southern portion of the City without potable water. PSOMAS 5-1 October 2016 Item 17. - 85 HB -640- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Legend City Boundary Zone 2 Boundary Southeast Service Area Reservoir I Booster Pump Station rr.r.r Newport -Inglewood Fault Southeast Transmission Main Pipe Connection to Overmyer Reservoir Groundwater Well • Pressure Relief Valve • Check Valve • Import Water Service Connection • Emergency Inter -Connection Water Pipes By Diameter 4"-6' 8' - 15" 16' - 18" 20' - 24" - 26' - 42- 5 ..r: v..arza Act RevervW, M1Zmr t Bps Yr owimanw. w.n su YOC-35 NnjVeH Conmctbn w.nu s��kR IMF 1 n Iwcuw neAuearwuc.al �3 c.R�..�v f; fit -4, Figure 5-1 Newport -Inglewood Fault and Southeast Service Area PSOMAS s-2 H B -641 _ Item 17. - 86 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 As adopted in the 2000 Water Master Plan, a 10 MG storage reservoir and an 11,000 gpm booster pump station is to be constructed in the southeast quadrant of the City, south of the fault. The reservoir and booster station were sized to supply demands to the area south of the fault and south of Bolsa Chica. Additionally, a 10,400 linear -foot 16-inch to 24-inch Southeast Transmission Main was also specified in the 2000 Water Master Plan to distribute water to the southeast service area and to the Downtown Loop. The proposed routing of this transmission main was north on Newland Street, then west on Atlanta Avenue to a tie-in with the 20-inch Downtown Loop at 3rd Street/Lake Street. The proposed transmission main was to be interconnected with a parallel 12-inch distribution main for the entire routing to distribute water to the southeast service area. As part of the hydraulic modeling work accomplished for this master plan update, it was determined that the original proposed diameter of the Southeast Transmission Main needs to be increased to 36-inches, and that additional piping is necessary to extend from Huntington Street/Atlanta Avenue to Overmyer Reservoir. With the construction of this "Southeast Reservoir and Booster Pump Station", the City would have 65.0 MG of storage capacity as shown in Table 5-1. However, the potential desalination project is also proposing to construct a 10 MG reservoir to store treated water prior to pumping it out to customers. If the new reservoir and pump station is constructed and connected to the City's proposed transmission main as is currently planned, then the need for a separate, City reservoir and pump station in this area would be negated. If the southeast portion of the City were to be cut off from the rest of the City system and existing storage northwest of the Fault, the new reservoir could provide water to this area during such an emergency situation. Under this scenario, the City would still need to construct the proposed Southeast Transmission Main. The four existing reservoirs are located in Zone 1. The proposed Southeast Reservoir or the new reservoir from the potential desalination project would also be located in Zone 1. Operational, fire, and emergency storage for Zone 2 is available from the Zone 1 reservoirs. Each of the City's reservoirs is a pumped storage reservoir that requires a booster pump station to boost water from the reservoir into the distribution system at appropriate pressure. Accordingly, the booster pump stations must be reliable. Natural-gas power is considered by some to be more reliable than electrical power. Emergency power is necessary at the booster pump stations to ensure supply from the storage reservoirs during a power outage. Emergency supply can take the place of emergency storage if the supply is available during the emergency scenario being considered. It then becomes important, whenever possible, to have emergency power or a dual source of energy at supply sites, such as the City's wells, to ensure a reliable source supply. All of the City's supply sources, wells and imported water connections, are located in Zone 1. The Zone 1 supply sources must provide peak -hour supply to the Zone 2 Edwards Hill and Reservoir Hill booster pumps because Zone 2 does not have a direct connection to a storage reservoir to supply operational storage. The Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station and Edwards Hill Booster Station, together, must have sufficient rs 'S 0 M A S 5-3 October 2016 Item 17. - 87 HB -642- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 pumping capacity to convey the Zone 2 peak -hour demand and the Zone 2 maximum -day demand plus fire -flow demand, and must be reliable. 5.2 Reservoir Operating Levels Table 5-1 shows the capacities of the City's reservoirs corresponding to the reservoirs being filled to their maximum levels. However, during a normal operating day, the reservoir levels typically vary between the maximum and minimum levels in order to supply water into the system when needed. The City typically fills reservoirs at night when system demands are low, but even then not all reservoirs are full at the same time. Reservoirs supply water into the system during the day when demands exceed the total supply from wells and imported water connections. The wells and imported water connections are set such that the reservoirs are exercised during high demand hours of a day. The volume that is drained and then refilled on a daily basis is operational storage. With this in mind, a total volume of 55 MG is rarely available at any one time. In assessing system storage, the full storage capacity of 55 MG is taken as a starting point. The operational storage needed for the maximum day demand (MDD) is then calculated. This volume is then subtracted from the 55 MG capacity to assess available storage when all reservoirs are at their lowest levels simultaneously during a normal operating day. Fire storage necessary for fire protection is then assessed assuming that complete system operational storage has been depleted during a normal MDD (worst case). Emergency storage, which is reservoir volume necessary to satisfy system demands when normal supplies are reduced or unavailable due to unusual circumstances, is then assessed after operational and fire storage volumes have been subtracted from system reservoirs (again, worst case). This is the industry standard methodology for assessing water system storage sufficiency. 5.3 Operational Storage As a general rule, supply sources other than reservoirs are designed to supply average day demand (ADD) up to MDD, and storage reservoirs are sized to supply the hourly demands in excess of MDD. This storage volume is termed operational storage. The reservoirs fill when demand falls below the total output from the wells and the imported water connections. Water agencies often reserve approximately 25% of MDD for operational storage. The City is located along the Pacific Ocean, which results in a moderate to mild climate. Accordingly, high demand variations in the summer are less severe than more inland areas. As a result, the City's actual operational storage may be slightly less than 25% of MDD. However, to be conservative, 25% of MDD will be used as the operational storage requirement for the City's water system for this water master plan. Year 2035 MDD for the City is estimated at 31,239 gpm (ADD of 17,355 gpm multiplied by a 1.80 MDD peaking factor as discussed in Section 2.3). At 25% of MDD, the operational storage requirement is 11.25 MG. PSOMAS 5-4 October 2016 HB -643- Item 17. - 88 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update 5.4 Fire Storage Chapter 5 Fire flow is the flow rate of a water supply that is available for firefighting from fire hydrants at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch (psi). City fire flow requirements are set by the City Fire Department and are based on the current Uniform Fire Code (UFC). The fire flow requirements are based on land use, construction materials, and building floor area (fire area). The UFC requirements are minimum requirements and additional fire flow and storage might be required as determined by the City's fire department. General fire flow requirements based on general land use classifications as shown in Table 5-2 will be used to analyze fire flow pressures and storage in this water master plan. Actual fire flow requirements would be determined by the City Fire Department in accordance with the UFC. The fire flows shown in Table 5-2 could be reduced if the building in question is provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system. It should be noted that, as of January 2011, all new residential construction is required to have fire sprinklers. Table 5-2 General Fire Flow Requirements for Water Master Plan Analysisa Fire Flow Flow Duration Land Use Designations (gpm) (hours) One and Two -Family (Low Density) 1,000 to 2,000 2 Residential Multi -Family (High Density) Residential, 3,500 3 Mobile Home Park, and School All Commercial (other than Regional), 5,000 5 Hospital Regional Commercial, Industrial 6,000 6 (a) The data in this table provides general City fire flow criteria to be used in this water master plan. Actual fire flow requirements would be determined by the City Fire Department in accordance with the Uniform Fire Code. As of Jan. 2011, all residential, including Low Density is required to have fire sprinklers, which should reduce flows above by up to 50% with a minimum of 500 gpm. Because a fire can occur on any day and at any time, the adequacy of fire storage and supply was analyzed under a MDD, after operational storage had been depleted. A Zone 1 fire flow storage requirement of two simultaneous 5,000-gpm fire flows for 5 hours (3.0 MG) was used in the 2005 and previous years' City Water Master Plans and will be used as the Zone 1 requirement in this water master plan. It assumed that the two simultaneous Commercial or Mixed -Use fires would occur in the Downtown Area. PSOMAS Item 17. - 89 5-5 October 2016 11 B -644- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 Zone 2 has some industrial land use. Accordingly, per the general fire flow requirements in Table 5-2, the maximum Zone 2 fire flow requirement is 6,000 gpm for 6 hours (2.16 MG gallons as indicated in Section 5.5.1). Because Zone 2 does not have a reservoir, this storage must be provided in Zone 1 reservoirs. The total Zone 1 fire storage requirement is then 5.16 MG. Booster pump stations utilized to satisfy fire flow requirements must be reliable with a redundant pump available for back up. For this reason, the largest pump at the Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station was assumed out of service in analyzing the adequacy of Zone 2 fire -flow supply. 5.5 Emergency Storage/Supply Emergency storage is the volume in reservoirs that is available to satisfy demands when normal supplies are reduced or unavailable due to unusual circumstances. For the City, normal water supply is from wells and imported water connections. An emergency reduction in normal water supplies can occur at any time and it must be assumed that emergency storage is available only after operational and fire storage have been depleted (or reserved) from the reservoirs on the MDD. One way to gauge the magnitude of available emergency storage is to determine the equivalent number of days of average demand that can be provided. Year 2040 operational plus fire storage requirement for the City is estimated at 16.41 MG (11.25 MG operational plus 5.16 MG fire). Currently, the City has 55.0 MG of storage capacity. After the operational and fire storage have been depleted, 38.59 MG of storage is available as emergency storage. At actual 2015 demands of 24.99 MG this equates to 1.54 average days of storage. At a year 2040 average demand of 27.13 MGD, 1.39 days of emergency storage would be available. With the construction of the proposed 10.0 MG Southeast Reservoir, 1.94 days of storage would be available using actual 2015 average demands and 1.76 days of storage would be available at 2040 demands. However, this is a rather abstract barometer of emergency storage that is primarily useful for comparison with other water purveyors. In a 2001 survey conducted by the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works, various water agencies in California, Washington, and Arizona were asked how much emergency storage the water agency had "if they lost their major source of supply". Emergency storage as the number of days of average demand (unless otherwise footnoted) for the various agencies contacted are shown in Table 5-3. Twenty five agencies are listed in Table 5-3. The days of emergency storage calculated above puts Huntington Beach in the middle of the agencies surveyed. This table was updated in 2016 based on data from published water master plans and Urban Water Management Plans for the various agencies, including City of Pomona, City of Torrance, City of Santa Monica, City of Seal Beach, City of Carlsbad, Mesa Water District, and Otay Water District. Note that some agencies responded with days of "peak -day" demand or days of "emergency storage", which are footnoted in Table 5-3. It is not known if days of "emergency storage" are days of average demand or peak demand. PSOMAS 5-6 October 2016 HB -645- Item 17. - 90 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 5-3 Emergency Storage for Other Water Purveyors Chapter 5 Emergency Storage (# Days Average Water Agency Demand)(') City of Huntington Beachlbl Without Southeast Reservoir (2015 demand) 1.5 With Southeast Reservoir (2015 demand) 1.9 Respondents to 2001 City of Huntington Beach Survey 1.9 City of Phoenix City of Tucson 2.6 City of Anaheim 0.5 City of Azusa 0.6 Palmdale Water District 2.1 Seattle Public Utilities(`) 1.5 City of Sacramento(d) 0.5 City of Garden Grove(d) 1.1 City of Inglewood(d) 1.4 City of Santa Ana(d) 0.4 City of Hawthorneldl 0.7 City of Torrance-2010 (e) 1.1 City of San Diego(d) 0.4 From Published Water Master Plans Irvine Ranch Water District 1.8 City of Santa Monica-2014 0.5 City of Seal Beach-2012 1.1 City of Carlsbad-2011 12.1 Capistrano Beach Water District — 1997 0.5 City of Pomona-2005 2.4 City of Tustin — 2000 0.4 City of Westminster —1999 0.3 Yucaipa Valley Water District 2.0 Mesa Water-2014 1.1 Otay Water District-2008 5.3 City of Ontario 1.0 (a) Unless otherwise footnoted (b) Based on estimated average -day demand for 2015 (c) Days of "peak -day" demand (d) Days of "emergency storage" (e) Data from Torrance Urban Water Management Plan p S 0 M k S 5-7 October 2016 Item 17. - 91 H B -646- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 Emergency storage for other local water agencies (as days of average demand) from information published in recent water master plan reports are also included in Table 5-3. The City of Huntington Beach is approximately in the middle for emergency storage as days of average demand relative to the other agencies listed in Table 5-3. However, the amount of emergency storage needed by a given agency is dependent on the availability of other supply sources during a specific emergency scenario. Emergency storage as days of average demand pertains to an emergency scenario where no other source of supply is expected to be available. For Huntington Beach, this translates to complete loss of both groundwater supply and imported water supply. This is a possible scenario, but highly unlikely relative to a scenario where either groundwater supply or imported water supply is lost or reduced. In an emergency situation where water supply is lost or reduced, the City would go to public notification to reduce water demand. A reduction in demand to 80% of average - day demand is assumed in this water master plan for the emergency scenarios evaluated. Note that the days of average demand emergency storage shown in Table 5-3 is for normal average -day demand, i.e. not reduced. In this water master plan, five different emergency storage/supply scenarios were evaluated: • Emergency Scenario No. 1: A complete loss of the City's imported water supply. • Emergency Scenario No 2: A complete loss of the City's imported water supply coupled with a 7-day electric power outage. • Emergency Scenario No 3: A complete loss of the City's groundwater supply. • Emergency Scenario No 4: A complete loss of the City's imported water and groundwater supplies. • Emergency Scenario No 5: A complete loss of water supply to the portions of the City south of the Newport -Inglewood fault as a consequence of an earthquake on this fault. Emereency Scenario No. 1: A complete loss of the City's imported water supply As discussed previously, the City purchases supplemental, treated, imported water from MWDOC, which is a member agency of MWD. MWD imports raw water from northern California and the Colorado River, then treats the majority of this water to potable standards at filtration plants located in throughout Southern California. As shown on Figure 5-2, imported water is conveyed to the City via the following routes: PSOMAS 5-8 October 2016 HB -647- Item 17. - 92 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 orange canny Feeder I West 0—g. County Feed- I [Diener Filtration Plant I ............. Pipeline West Orarvge County wars eaam Feeder N.. 2 11,0n. Lake Pipali. OC-35 — County Voc-9 I. i East Orange County 10—ti. County Fee LEGEND City Boundary Diener Filtration Plant Location Where Imported Water Service Connection Enters City 0 20,000 Feet Figure 5-2 Imported Water Pipeline System I .3-9 October 2016 Item 17. - 93 HB -648- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 From the Diemer Filtration Plant to the East Orange County Feeder No. 2 (EOCF2) to the OC-44 Transmission Line to the OC-44 Service Connection at Adams Street and the Santa Ana River. 1. From the Diemer Filtration Plant and/or the Jensen Filtration Plant (to either the Lower Feeder or the Second Lower Feeder) to the West Orange County Feeder to: a. the West Orange County Water Feeder No. 1 to the OC-9 Service Connection at Newland Street and Edinger Street, and b. the West Orange County Water Feeder No. 2 to the OC-35 Service Connection at Springdale Street and Glenwood Street. The City's allocated capacities in OC-9, OC-35, and OC-44 are shown in Table 5-4. Table 5-4 City Imported Water Service Connections Allocated Capacity Connection (gpm) Zone Supply Location Dale and Katella Streets OC-9 6,300 Zone 1 (City of Stanton) Dale and Katella Streets OC-35 9,000 Zone 1 (City of Stanton) Adams Ave. & Santa Ana River OC-44 6,700 Zone 1 (East Orange County Feeder No. 2) TOTAL 22,000 The most likely causes for an imported water outage or reduction in supply would be a break in an imported water transmission main or mains or an outage at a filtration plant. Imported water transmission pipelines are well designed, with most of the pipelines constructed of welded steel pipe. However, the imported water transmission pipelines traverse hundreds of miles in areas with high seismic potential and this makes the imported water supply system susceptible to damage in a seismic event. Additionally, aging pipelines are subject to failure, especially metal pipes without corrosion protection systems in place. The MWD recommendation has been for water agencies to have seven days of storage/supply independent of imported water in order to have supply when MWD must take facilities down for repair or maintenance and as a safeguard against an emergency imported water outage. The imported water pipelines (outside of the City) also operate at high pressures and a pressure surge could rupture a pipeline. In December 1999, a pressure surge on the Allen McColloch Pipeline (AMP) ruptured a section of pipe. Because the rupture occurred on a section of pipe that was easily accessible and occurred in the winter, repairs took four weeks. Otherwise, the repair could have taken much longer. PSOMAS 5-10 October 2016 HB -649- Item 17. - 94 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 MWD's "Infrastructure Reliability and Protection Plan (IRPP)" is a program where MWD evaluates the reliability of its aqueduct facilities, treatment plants and distribution system. MWD conducted a regional evaluation of the risks to its facilities from earthquakes and categorized recovery times for four types of defined events, as summarized in Table 5-5. In addition to the recovery times shown in Table 5-5, MWD also provided a more detailed assessment of the time required for specific facilities in Orange County. An outage of the Diemer Filtration Plant is estimated to have a recovery time of 31 days and repairs on the East Orange County Feeder No. 2 is estimated to take 10 days. For Orange County, the most significant risk to imported water supply is believed to be movement of the Whittier -Elsinore fault system. Table 5-5 MWD IRRP-Defined Events and Recovery Times Defined Event Type of Failure Recovery Time Single location pipe failure due to Nominal Single Event earthquake, operational occurrences, or 3 to 10 days 3rd party incidents Recovery Plan Event Multiple location pipe failures due to a 14 to 21 days moderate earthquake Complex Single Event Single location pipe failure in a difficult 21 to 31+days location with interfering utilities Failures of treatment plants and Extreme Event distribution system due to seismic events 1 to 6 months that significantly exceed design criteria The City has some protection against losing its entire imported water supply because imported water can be conveyed from the Diemer Plant to the City via several routes to OC-9 and OC-35 and a separate route to OC-44. Although concurrent breaks on several routes are possible, concurrent breaks on all of the routes is not considered likely. The City can also receive treated imported water from the Diemer Filtration Plant and the Jensen Treatment Plant via the West Orange County Feeder conveyance route, leaving the City less vulnerable to an outage at either of the two plants. For the 2012 WMP, MWDOC was contacted to discuss imported water supply reliability for Huntington Beach and their position is that the City might receive all, some, or none of its normal imported water supply after a major facility outage depending on circumstances. MWDOC would act to send imported supply to where it is most needed. Most likely, the City would see at least some reduction in its normal imported water supply because of the City's strong groundwater supply relative to other areas entirely dependent on imported water. MWDOC would prioritize who most needed imported water, and conceivably the City could be asked to get by on groundwater alone if that is where the City fell on the priority list. PSOMAS 5-11 October 2016 Item 17. - 95 HB -650- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 Under an extreme emergency in which no imported water were available, the City would have to rely on 100% groundwater supply to meet demands of 13,884 gpm and 15,074 gpm, which is the City's year 2015 and 2040 average -day demand, respectively, reduced by 20% through public notification. In evaluating this emergency condition, it is assumed that "normal" booster pumping capacity, i.e. capacity from duty pumps not including the largest backup pump at each site, is available at all of the booster pump stations. If a duty pump were to be out of service for repair, it is assumed that the backup pump would take its place. To be conservative, it is assumed that one well pump is out of service for repair at the time of the emergency. For this evaluation, Well No. 5 is assumed to be out of service. The City has a total potable water well normal operating capacity estimated at 18,600 gpm as shown in Table 5-6, with the assumptions footnoted. However, under the assumption that Well No. 5 is out of service, the normal operating capacity is reduced to 16,100 gpm. Using a normal operating capacity of 16,100 gpm to satisfy the 2015 reduced demand of 13,884 gpm results in a supply surplus of 2,216 gpm for a 30-day outage. The estimated year 2040 average -day demand reduced by 20% through public notification is 15,074 gpm. Using a normal operating capacity of 16,100 gpm results in a supply surplus of 1,026 gpm for a 7-day outage. Table 5-6 Well Supply under Emergency and Electrical Power Outage Well Estimated Operating Capacity (gpm) Electric Motor (EM) or Natural Gas Engine (NG) * Above Normal Operating Capacity (gpm) Available Capacity w/Electrical Power Outage (gpm) Well No. 3A 2,000 EM 2,000 0 Well No. 4 300 NG 300 300 Well No. 5 2,500 EM 2,500 0 Well No. 6 1,500 NG 2,500 2,500 Well No. 7 3,000 NG 3,000 3,000 Well No. 9 1,500 NG 2,500 2,500 Well No. 10 3,300 NG 3,300 3,300 Well No. 13 2,500 NG 2,500 2,500 TOTAL (gpm) 16,600 18,600 14,100 TOTAL (mgd) 23.90 20.30 * Well No. 6 & Well No. 9 can operate above normal capacity with acceptable level of lower aesthetic water quality due to presence of color and low level of odor from H2S PSOMAS 5-12 October 2016 1113-651- Item 17. - 96 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 Emergency Scenario No 2: A complete loss of the City's imported water supply coupled with a 7-day electrical power outage Under this emergency scenario, it is assumed that an earthquake would disable the imported water supply for up to 31 days and would create a 7-day electrical power outage. In this scenario it is assumed that natural gas supply is not lost at any of the booster pump stations or well sites. The City has backup propane storage/equipment at each of the booster pump sites to power natural-gas engines in the event of an outage of the normal natural-gas supply, i.e. natural gas pipelines. Well Nos. 4, 7, and 13 also can receive emergency propane supply from the 10,000-gallon LPG tank at the Peck facilities site. In accordance with the 1995 Water Master Plan, to provide energy back-up at well sites, the City purchased a portable, trailer -mounted propane storage vessel in 2010 and constructed vaporizers at Well Site Nos. 6, 9, and 10. As in Emergency Scenario No. 1, it is assumed that normal booster pumping capacity is available, but that Well No. 5 is out of service for repairs. As shown in Table 5-6, Well Nos. 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 13 operate off of natural-gas engines and these wells would be available during an electrical power outage, whereas Well No.'s 3A, and 5 have electric motors and would be out of service as backup generators are not available. Well No. 5 is assumed out of service due to repairs consistent with the assumption made in Emergency Scenario 1. Therefore, the well supply would be reduced from 18,600 gpm to 14,100 gpm as shown in Table 5-6. As discussed in Chapter 4, all pumps at the booster pump stations with one exception are powered by a natural gas engine or can be powered by either an electric motor or a natural gas engine. All of these pumps would be available during an electrical power outage. The exception is the 400-gpm pump at the Zone 2 Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station that is powered by an electric motor only and is assumed to be out of service during the electrical power outage. The City's projected 2015 average -day demand reduced by 20% through public notification is estimated at 13,884 gpm. During an electrical power outage, available well supply is estimated to be 14,100 gpm, which results in a supply surplus of 216 gpm for a 7-day outage. The small amount of surplus water would fill reservoirs by approximately 2.2 MG over the 7-day outage. The estimated year 2040 average -day demand reduced by 20% through public notification is 15,074 gpm. During an electrical power outage, a supply deficit of 9.8 MG (974 gpm) for the 7-day period would occur. However, the City will have 40.0 MG of emergency storage available even without considering the 10.0 MG Southeast or the new reservoir from the potential desalination project to satisfy demand during the 7-day outage. PSOMA Item 17. - 97 5-13 October 2016 HB -652- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 Emergency Scenario No 3: A complete loss of the City's groundwater supply Another emergency scenario is a complete loss in the City's groundwater supply from the Orange County Groundwater Basin, conceivably as a result of basin groundwater contamination. This emergency scenario is not deemed as likely as an imported water outage. In such an emergency, other basin producers would also be affected and a larger strain would be placed on imported water supply. Again, MWD and MWDOC would prioritize imported water delivery to agencies on a most needed basis. The City may or may not receive all of its imported water supply, which is 22,000 gpm as shown in Table 5-4. The maximum allocation of 22,000 gpm is more than sufficient to meet demands of 13,884 gpm and 15,074 gpm, which is the City's 2015 and year 2040 average -day demand, respectively, reduced by 20% through public notification. Under 2015 reduced demand scenario, the City would also have approximately 41.1 MG to 51.1 MG of emergency storage available depending on whether the 10 MG Southeast or the new reservoir from the potential desalination project is on line. The existing emergency storage alone of 41.1 MG is equivalent to an 951-gpm supply for 30 days for the existing system and a 1,183-gpm supply for 30 days for the year 2040 system, assuming the additional 10 MG reservoir is on line by then. Emergency Scenario No 4: A complete loss of both the City's imported water and groundwater supplies A scenario where the City completely lost both its groundwater supply and its imported water supply is considered extremely unlikely. This would be the scenario where the total emergency supply for the City would need to come from emergency reservoir storage because it is assumed that neighboring cities would also be affected by such an extreme water supply emergency and that supply from emergency connections with other cities would not be available. Available emergency storage is equivalent to 1.54 days of operation for the projected 2015 water system demands and 1.39 days of operation for the 2040 system demands, assuming no additional storage is constructed; and 1.76 days assuming the 10 MG Southeast or the new reservoir from the potential desalination project is on line by then. However, under such an extreme outage scenario, the City would go to immediate public notification and demand would be reduced well below average demand. Because of the severe condition, it could be assumed that water demand would be reduced to 40% of average. A 40% reduction results in emergency storage equivalent to 2.87 days of operation for the projected 2015 water system demand and 2.61 days of operation for the 2040 system demands, assuming no additional storage is constructed; and 3.23 days assuming the additional 10 MG reservoir is on line by then. Emergency Scenario No 5: A complete loss of water supply to the portions of the City south of the Newport -Inglewood fault as a consequence of an earthquake on this fault Pumped storage in the southern part of the City, south of the Newport -Inglewood fault, was recommended in both the 2000 and 2005 Water Master Plans and is recommended in this water master plan update based on the findings in the 1999 City of Huntington Beach Infrastructure Restoration Study (Special Study Report on the Water and Drainage System Infrastructure) prepared by the U.S. Army Corp (1999 Army Corps Study). PSOMAS 5-14 HB -653- October 2016 Item 17. - 98 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 Currently, there are no sources of supply and no storage reservoirs in the City south of the fault. The 1999 Army Corps Study concluded that water transmission supply pipelines crossing the fault would be ruptured by a design -basis earthquake on this fault, leaving the area south of the fault without a water supply. The study anticipated that a portion of the major water mains crossing the fault could be repaired after the earthquake to provide partial service to the southern areas isolated by the fault. The City has purchased property at the AES generating plant site as the location for the Southeast Reservoir and Booster Pump Station. When this reservoir or the new reservoir and adjacent booster station from the potential desalination project is constructed, along with the Southeast Transmission Main, they would provide fire plus emergency storage for the area south of the fault and east of Bolsa Chica. These projects are recommended to remain for inclusion in the City's Water CIP as discussed in Chapter 7. 5.5.1 Pressure Zone 2 The 2040 maximum day demand projected for Zone 2 is 2,096 gpm (3.02 MGD) using a 2.7 MDD factor as discussed in Section 2.3 (average day demand for Zone 2 estimated at 776 gpm, or 4.12% of total average day demand). At 25% of the maximum day demand, the operational storage requirement for Zone 2 is 0.75 MG. A 6,000-gpm fire flow for five hours is the Zone 2 fire flow requirement because of industrial land use in Zone 2. This equates to a fire storage requirement of 2.16 MG. The combined Zone 2 fire and operational storage requirement of 2.91 MG is well within the overall system requirement of 37.63 MG of emergency storage as described previously in Section 5.5. The Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station has a Zone 2 pumping capacity of 6,060 gpm with the largest pump (3,500 gpm) out of service. The Edwards Hill Booster Pump Station has a pumping capacity of 3,750 gpm with all three Zone 2 pumps in operation. The combined Zone 2 pumping capacity of 9,810 gpm is sufficient to supply the MDD plus fire flow requirement of 8,096 gpm (2,096 + 6,000). The Reservoir Hill booster pumps with the exception of Pump No. 1 are powered by natural gas engines and the Edwards Hill booster pumps can be powered by either an electric motor or a natural gas engine. All of these pumps would be available during an electrical power outage. The exception is the 400-gpm Pump No. 1 at the Reservoir Hill Booster Pump Station that is powered by an electric motor only and is the only pump that would be out of service during an electrical power outage. A 1,500-gallon LPG tank and associated equipment are located at the Edwards Hill site to provide backup propane gas supply for operation of the engine -driven pumps. Two 3,900-gallon LPG tanks and associated equipment are located at the Overmyer/Reservoir Hill site to provide backup propane gas supply for operation of the Reservoir Hill booster pumps as well as the Overmyer booster pumps. pk S 0 M AS 5-15 October 2016 Item 17. - 99 HB -654- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 5 5.6 Storage/Supply Adequacy for Emergency Operating Conditions The City has sufficient reservoir storage to satisfy City operational plus fire storage requirements through the planning period ending in the year 2040. As scheduled in the City's current Water CIP, a 10-MG storage reservoir and an 11,000-gpm booster pump station will be constructed in the southeast quadrant of the City to ensure supply reliability and storage for the area south of the Newport Inglewood Fault and south of Bolsa Chica. The City has sufficient emergency storage, groundwater supply, imported water supply, and emergency power to withstand a number of emergency supply outage scenarios evaluated in this Chapter. In accordance with the 1995 Water Master Plan to provide energy back-up at well sites, the City purchased a portable, trailer -mounted 500 gallon propane storage vessel in 2010 and constructed vaporizers at Well Site Nos. 6, 9, and 10. f S O M A S 5-16 October 2016 HB -655- Item 17. - 100 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 6 6 HYDRAULIC MODEL CONSTRUCTION, MODEL VALIDATION & SCENARIO MODELING (NO CHANGES WERE MADE FROM THE 2012 WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE) In the 2012 Water Master Plan Update, the hydraulic model provided by the City staff was validated, and updated with analysis of projected future 2035 demand conditions. However, as stated below in Section 6.2, annual demands have actually decreased even with increasing population, primarily due to a steady trend of water reduction through aggressive water conservative efforts. Therefore, no updates were made for this Chapter 6 from the 2012 Water Master Plan. The projected future 2035 demand from the 2012 Water Master Plan was 34,657 AFY, while this master plan is projecting future 2040 demand at 30,396 AFY. In addition, no major physical pipeline or supply improvements have been made since 2012, and any proposed improvements from "New Projects" listed in Table 7-3 would certainly further enhance the water system hydraulically. In the future when major improvements are constructed, the City's water engineering team will update the model accordingly. 6.1 Hydraulic Model Description The hydraulic model used for this master plan was provided by City staff at the outset of the project. The model is in WaterCAD format and is compatible with Water GEMS modeling software by Bentley Systems. The model is used routinely by City staff and contains numerous scenarios. It contains all pipes, wells, reservoirs, imported water connections, and booster stations in the existing water distribution system, and several demand allocations including those representing existing and estimated future demand conditions for average day, maximum day and peak hour demands. 6.2 Model Validation Existing demands were first revised to correspond to the reduced demands experienced over the past few years as described in Chapter 2, which are also consistent with the 2010 UWMP, as discussed in Chapter 2. Then a series of validation analyses were conducted to verify that the model adequately simulated observed operating conditions within the distribution system. An existing demand condition was selected for the validation analyses after review of the model and discussion with City staff. The validation analyses were run under various existing demand conditions. The results were reviewed with City staff, and it was determined that the existing model provided accurate results for use on this project. The review determined that the existing piping system was sufficiently accurate and the existing demand allocation was suitable for analyses for this Water Master Plan. The WaterCAD model simulates pump station flows and pressures into the system using reservoirs set to an overflow elevation equal to the hydraulic gradient in the system. Refill rates to the water storage facilities are simulated with control valves and a separate reservoir to receive the refill water. Imported supplies from the three turnouts and from City wells are simulated as input flow to the system (negative demand) equal to the P'Q 0 M A S 6-1 October 2016 Item 17. - 101 HB -656- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 6 reported typical yield of each well and turnout. In cases where a well or turnout is not operating, input flows are set to zero. Hydraulic analyses conducted for this project used the existing system model to create a series of extended period simulation (EPS) analyses that represent demands experienced over a typical week in June 2007. These demand curves were then uniformly increased to reflect conditions that could be expected during a week of maximum demand. Hydraulic analyses were conducted under existing and future year 2035 demand conditions. In recent years, due to aggressive water conservation and water allocation, demands have been down as shown in Table 2-2. Therefore, existing demands were derived from the average demand from 2005/06 to 2007/08, prior to any water allocations to reflect existing normal year water demand, consistent with the City's 2010 UWMP. Details on the hydraulic analyses methodology and results are provided as technical memorandums in the appendices of the 2012 Water Master Plan report with summaries provided below. 6.3 Distribution System Modeling Various scenarios were set up by varying demand conditions and modeled to analyze the transmission and distribution system to determine system responses and develop recommended capital improvements. These scenarios are summarized in the following sections and described in the technical memorandums in the appendices. 6.3.1 Maximum Week Condition 6.3.1.1 Existing Demands Demand data for a typical week in June of 2007 was provided by City staff, including diurnal curves for the entire week. These typical daily demands were factored up to represent a typical week during the maximum week. Current data for a typical week in June 2015 was also provided by City staff, for comparison purposes to determine if maximum demands require adjusting and additional model updates accomplished. Due to the fact that water use may rebound in the future, and to remain somewhat conservative in hydraulic modeling, peaking factors will remain the same as that determined from the 2012 Water Master Plan. The June 2007 data had an average daily demand of just over 23,000 gpm and a maximum peak hourly demand of 34,700 gpm. While the June 2015 data had a significantly lower average daily demand of approximately 16,600 gpm, the maximum hourly demand was just over 33,600 gpm for both Zone 1 Zone 2, which is only slightly lower than what was modeled in the previous master plan. Since the peak demands used in the previous modeling were somewhat conservative but similar, no additional modeling is required for this master plan update. Capital projects included in the previous master plans that remain to be completed are discussed in detail in Chapter 7, and were analyzed in 2012 Water Master Plan to determine/confirm proper sizing and location. PSOMAS 6-2 October 2016 HB -657- Item 17. - 102 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 6 6.3.1.2 Future (2035) Demands The future, 2035 demand projections (sometimes referred to as Build -out in this master plan) were described previously in Chapter 2. The additional demands over and above existing demands come primarily from two major specific plan areas, the Beach -Edinger Corridors Area and the Downtown Area, as discussed in Chapter 2. Therefore, projected additional demands are placed on nodes within the water distribution system in accordance with the location where they are anticipated to occur as described in the Build -out Demands & Distribution of Demands dated February 14, 2012 (Appendix A from the 2012 Water Master Plan). As indicated in the beginning of Chapter 6, no chan-aes were made to the hydraulic model for demand loadings on nodes. Similar to the existing system hydraulic modeling discussed above, the future demands projected for 2035, were placed on the hydraulic model and week-long EPS runs were analyzed for average and maximum day conditions. Under these Build -out system hydraulic analyses, the water transmission and distribution system, including all of the remaining master plan improvement projects discussed in Section 7.2, performed very well. There are capital improvement concepts analyzed that can help meet build -out maximum day demands totaling almost 38,700 gpm. As indicated in the beginningof Chapter 6, no changes were made to the hydraulic model to include analyses with the proposed "New Protects" listed in Table 7-3 because those improvements would only further improve hydraulic performance of the entire water system. V'r- 0 M AS 6-3 October 2016 Item 17. - 103 HB -658- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 7.1 Overview On September 18, 1995, the City Council adopted the Capital Surcharge, a pay-as-you-go (cash) basis to fund master plan projects listed in the City's Water Master Plan. The Capital Surcharge is a flat monthly charge to each water customer, regardless of water usage. The surcharge first became effective December 1, 1995 and was initially set at $3.00 per month per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). It increased $0.50 each December 1 through December 1, 2000, when it became $5.50 per month per EDU. On December 1, 2007, the surcharge was decreased to $2.00 per EDU and was to remain at that level in perpetuity to pay for the maintenance of facilities built from water master plan recommendations. On November 19, 2007, City Resolution 2007-78 rolled the $2.00 surcharge into the monthly water meter rate of Water Fund for on -going maintenance of facilities. The water meter rate is adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index. A summary of monthly Capital Surcharges appears in Table 7-1. As of October 1, 2015, the Water Master Plan Fund balance was approximately $28.1 million. Table 7-1 History of Monthly Capital Surcharges � Effective Datea Monthly Surcharge($/EDU) December 1, 1995 $3.00 December 1, 1996 $3.50 December 1, 1997 $4.00 December 1, 1998 $4.50 December 1, 1999 $5.00 December 1, 2000 $5.50 December 1, 2001 $5.50 December 1, 2002 $5.50 December 1, 2003 $5.50 December 1, 2004 $5.50 December 1, 2005 $5.50 December 1, 2006 $5.50 December 1, 2007b $2.00 a) City Resolution 99-34 Adopted the Capital Surcharge Schedule b) City Resolution 2007-78 rolled the $2.00 Capital Surcharge into the monthly water meter rate of Water Fund for on -going maintenance of facilities. The water meter rate is adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index. The water master plan capital improvement program is periodically updated, typically every five years, with the last update completed in 2012. The list of capital projects are PSOMAS 7-1 October 2016 HB -659- Item 17. - 104 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 determined based on current and projected system demands, the estimated remaining useful life of existing water system infrastructure, and the necessity to enhance and improve water quality and reliability. While many original projects have been completed since the inception of the Water Master Plan, capital projects with a project cost of approximately $38.3 million remain to be constructed. Furthermore, this current Water Master Plan update has identified a significant number of new capital projects, with total costs of an additional approximately $89.9 million that are essential to replace aging critical water system infrastructure throughout the City. Therefore, a sum total of approximately $128.2 million (based on present value, not including future esclation) in water infrastructure improvements are necessary over the next 20 years. 7.2 Remaining Water Master Plan Capital Improvement Projects Water master plan projects that remain to be constructed from the 2012 Water Master Plan to be funded from the water master plan project funds are described below and are identified with project numbering consistent with the previous 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2012 water master plans. Project costs for which money has been encumbered prior to March 31, 2016 are not included. For example, projects with design completed only need funds for construction. Proiect No. 1: Beach Boulevard Pipe Improvements For Project No. 1, dead end pipe segments are to be connected in locations along Beach Boulevard to improve water supply and fire flow reliability to adjacent areas fronting this thoroughfare. Dead end segments will be connected on the east side of Beach Boulevard from the flood control channel (OCFCD C-6) to Blaylock Drive, a total length of approximately 1,400 linear feet of 12-inch pipeline. Two connections of existing parallel lines running along the east and west sides of Beach Boulevard will also be made near Blaylock Drive and near Holt Avenue. Both of these relatively short connecting pipes will likely involve costly construction method to cross Beach Boulevard. Design is complete and currently in the process to obtain Caltrans Encroachment Permit. Proiect No. 12: Permanent Wellhead Facilities for Well #13 Well #13, a fairly new well, has been operating with temporary facilities. Building a permanent well head enclosure will utilize the existing casing but will include a larger building, new mechanical equipment, improved controls, along with electrical equipment to allow this pump to operate as a hybrid, using electricity as well as natural gas. Proiect No. 13: Southeast Reservoir and Booster Pump Station As discussed previously, a 10 million gallon storage reservoir and an 11,000 gpm booster pump station was recommended since the 2000 Water Master Plan Update in order to increase reliability to this area in the event of a major earthquake along the Newport - Inglewood Fault. As a part of the proposed desalination plant plan, the project includes construction of a storage reservoir and a booster pump station that would eliminate the P fi 0 M A S 7-2 October 2016 Item 17. - 105 HB -660- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 need for the City to construct these facilities. These new facilities would be available to this area in the event of such an emergency situation. Proiect No. 14: Southeast Reservoir Transmission Main A 10,400 linear foot, 36-inch distribution/transmission main will be constructed from the potential desalination booster station or City Southeast Reservoir Booster Pump Station to transmit water to the Downtown Loop. This new line will be interconnected with existing distribution lines along its route to distribute water to the southeast service area. The proposed routing from the Booster Station is north on Newland Street, then west on Atlanta Avenue to a tie-in with the 20-inch Downtown Loop at 3rd Street/Lake Street. This segment was undersized in the 2005 Water Master Plan at 16-inches to 24-inches and needs to be 36-inches in diameter. Proiect No. 14A: Southeast Reservoir Transmission Main Extension to Overmyer Modeling conducted with the 2012 Water Master Plan Update determined that an additional water transmission pipeline is needed to connect the Southeast Transmission Main to Overmyer Reservoir to handle day-to-day operations and to maintain water quality throughout the system. This additional transmission pipeline should have been included with the previous master plan updates and continues to be included as part of this current list of remaining master plan projects. The project involves a 1.5 mile, 36-inch and 0.25 mile 42-inch pipeline extension from the Southeast Reservoir Transmission Main at Atlanta Avenue up Huntington Street to Overmyer Reservoir. Additionally, two pressure regulating stations are needed for the two interconnects to the smaller diameter distribution system pipelines near the proposed Southeast Reservoir site and at the tie-in to the 20-inch Downtown Loop. This project would, of course, only be constructed in conjunction with or following the construction of the Southeast Reservoir Transmission Main, Project No. 14, above. This new, 1.75 mile transmission main could be operated under system pressure to move water from Overmyer Reservoir to maintain levels in the Southeast Reservoir. Along with the Southeast Booster Station, it could also be operated to back-up Overmyer Reservoir if the reservoir needs to be taken down for maintenance. In the event desalinated water becomes available, this line could operate either (1) under system pressure; or (2) under low pressure as a dedicated fill line to Overmyer Reservoir. Proiect No. 16: Fire Protection Improvements To improve fire flow pressures and supply reliability at Peters Landing in Huntington Harbor, a 12-inch main will be constructed on 24th Street, from South Pacific Avenue to tie into the 12-inch pipeline in Pacific Coast Highway (approximately 400 linear feet). To improve fire flow pressures and supply reliability at the high density residential area located east of Beach boulevard and south of Atlanta Avenue, an 8-inch water main will be constructed to connect the 6-inch main in Attleboro Circle to the new development known as Pacific Shores to the south. Design has been completed on this approximate PSOMAS 7-3 October 2016 H B -6 1 _ Item 17. - 106 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 300-foot length of pipeline, but construction has been deferred to bundle with other water replacement projects in the Sunset Beach area. Proiect No. NA: Well #1 Replacement This project was included since the 1995 Water Master Plan to increase its capacity to around 750 gpm. On and around, Well # 1 cease to produce water and has since been taken out of service. The existing well site is located in a residential neighborhood around Bolsa Avenue and Springdale Street. Replacement Well #lA is being designed on the same site to "blend in" with adjacent homes, while maintaining all necessary functional features to properly operate and maintain the well. The projected design well capacity will be around 1,000 gpm to 1,500 gpm, offsetting the capacity that was lost from the original Well #1 (refer to Table 3-9 for history of active and abandoned water wells). The estimated costs for the remaining capital projects described above, in 2015 dollars, are summarized along with their year of anticipated design and construction on Table 7-2. Projects already complete or with funds encumbered prior to March 31, 2016 are not listed. p C 0 M A S 7-4 October 2016 Item 17. - 107 HB -662- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 7-2 Estimated Costs for Remaining Water Master Plan Projects Chapter 7 Project # from 2012 WMP Project Name Estimated Design FY Estimated Design Costa,b Estimated Construct. FY Estimated Construction Costa,` Total Estimated Cost Program Category 1 Beach Blvd. Pipeline Improvementsd NA $ - 2016 $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Distribution 12 Well 13 Permanent Wellhead 2022 $ 200,000 2023 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,000,000 Production 13 Southeast Res. & Booster PS 2033 $ 1,597,000 2034-35 $ 17,648,000 $19,245,000 Production 14 Southeast Res. Trans. Main 2033 $ 503,000 2034-35 $ 5,355,000 $ 5,858,000 Distribution 14A New Connection - Overmyer to SE TM 2033 $ 540,900 2034-35 $ 5,409,000 $ 5,949,900 Distribution 1.75 mi. 36" to 42" in Huntngtn. St. $ 500,300 $ 5,003,000 Interconnects @ Overmyer Res. $ 25,600 $ 256,000 PRVs @ SE Res. & Atlanta/Dwntn Lp $ 15,000 $ 150,000 16 Fire Protection Improvementsd NA $ - 2018 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Distribution NA Well 1 Replacement NA $ - 2016-17 $ 4,250,000 $ 4,250,000 Replacement Total $ 2,840,900 $ 35,462,000 $ 38,302,900 a) 2016 Costs estimates. Escalation of design and construction costs will be accounted for in Financial Plan. b) Design Costs range from 5 to 15% of construction costs, depending on project size and complexity and include preliminary design, final design, potholing, geotechnical, survey, and bidding services. c) Construction Costs include construction management and City project management. Construction management costs range from 2.5 to 5% of construction costs for shop drawings, RFIs, field visits, etc., but do not include inspection services. City project management costs range from 5 to 9% of construction costs and may include inspection services depending on the project type. d) Design already complete or costs encumbered. CD J S 0 M A S 7_5 October 2016 O 00 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 7.3 New Water Master Plan Capital Improvement Projects Thirty Seven (37) new Water Master Plan projects and annual programs have been identified below, numbered from No. 21 to No. 57. These new projects and remaining projects above will all be funded by available Water Master Plan funds, and will be implemented in order of their respective priority, as determined by Public Works staff. The estimated costs for the new capital projects described below, in November 2015 dollars, are summarized along with their year of anticipated design and construction on Table 7-3. New Proiect No. 21: OC-44 San Diego Creek Crossing Rehabilitation via 30-Inch Pipeline Slip -lining Inside Existing 42-Inch Pipeline - Phase I OC-44 Pipeline was constructed in the 1960's, and is one of three vital imported water transmission mains serving the City. This pipeline is jointly owned by the Mesa Water District (58.6%) and the City (41.4%). The segment of the 42-inch pipeline that crosses beneath the San Diego Creek, near Highway 73 and Jamboree Road, has a history of failures requiring multiple costly repairs in an environmentally sensitive area. Consequently, design is near completion to rehabilitate the pipeline by slip -lining a smaller 30-inch diameter Ductile Iron earthquake resistant pipe, approximately 1,700 feet, inside the existing 42-inch steel transmission main. This is an aggressive Phase I pipeline rehabilitation project to prevent another costly leak repair in the San Diego Creek, while a separate future Phase II improvement will consist of installing "Rip -Rap" in the creek for added scour protection (described as New Project No. 55 below). This pipeline rehabilitation project will increase overall reliability of OC-44, extend its service life, and minimize, if not eliminate, the liability that will result from future pipe failures in the San Diego Creek area. New Proiect No. 22: Peck Booster Station Dual Energy Drive and Well #7 Security Improvements Peck Booster Station is the 2nd largest of three Zone 1 booster stations that primarily maintains pressure and meets daily water demand in the northern end of the City. The back -bone of this booster station consists of four large natural gas engines, each over 300 horsepower and capable of delivering a total flow of over 4,600 gallons per minute. Converting these pump engines to a dual drive hybrid system capable of running on either natural gas or electricity will provide two major benefits: • Allow the City to operate this station within the South Coast Air Quality Management District's stringent air quality requirements. • Provide added reliability for the vital booster station due to the flexible energy options. In conjunction with the dual drive project, Well #7 Security Improvement Project will be included as part of this project. Well #7 is located just east of Peck Booster Station. Improvements will consist of adding new structures to secure the well site from unwanted activities, with state-of-the-art monitoring equipment and lighting for added security. P'Q0MAS Item 17. - 109 7-6 October 2016 H B -664- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 New Project No. 23: Bolsa Chica 8-Inch Water Main Extension This pipeline extension project will provide redundant water pipelines for fire protection and water quality purposes to The Landing housing tract area located at the end of Slater Avenue and west of Graham Street. This project will connect four dead end water lines located at the end of Graham Street, Falkirk Lane, Bankton Drive and Allstone Drive that would remove the dependency on only one connection from the City's water system currently serving this residential community of approximately 175 residences. Two new 8-inch diameter pipelines, totaling approximately 1,225 linear feet, will be constructed starting at the end of these streets into California State Lands' property located within the Bolsa Chica Wetlands Area. The California State Lands Commission has approved and granted the City a lease to construct the waterlines within their property. This project fulfills the need for redundancy and reliability to this community for fire protection purposes and will also improve the water quality in the area including the State Lands Ecological Reserve Facility located at the end of Graham Street. New Proiect No. 24: Water Well #9 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor Removal Treatment System Water Well #9, located near Newland Street and Warner Avenue, was drilled around 1981 and has a design pumping capacity over 3,000 gpm. Well #9 is one of eight remaining active wells in the City. While the design of new replacement wells are underway, it will be several years before any of those new wells are able to provide the existing distribution network with supplemental water supply. The existing well infrastructure at Well #9 is in good condition, but the production rate has been reduced by more than 50 percent because of customer complaints of odor from the presence of Hydrogen Sulfide. Extensive testing and monitoring of various potential treatment options resulted in the final selection of a cost effective natural treatment process using Granular Activated Carbon filter media. Upon completion of the treatment system, Well #9 will be able to produce high quality water at full design capacity. New Project No. 25. WOCWB OC-35 Steel 33-Inch Transmission Main Relocation by Springdale Street and Westminster Blvd for I-405 Widening The upcoming Orange County Transit Authority's I-405 Widening Project will require relocation of OC-35 by Springdale Street and Westminster Blvd, a West Orange County Water Board (WOCWB) owned 33-inch steel transmission main that was installed around 1963. WOCWB is jointly owned by the City (52.5%), City of Westminster (25.4%), City of Seal Beach (14.3%), and City of Garden Grove (7.8%). A preliminary feasibility assessment recommended relocating the existing transmission main away from the Westminster Blvd Bridge, which will be reconstructed as part of the widening effort, to nearby residential streets (Willow Land and Mahogany Avenue) with a new transmission pipe and casing underneath the freeway. Based on City staff s research of historical documents, WOCWB does not appear to have "prior rights" for the existing transmission main, therefore the Orange County Transit Authority will likely require WOCWB to be financially responsible for all design and relocation costs, and that relocation of the existing pipeline must be completed before the freeway widening project construction commences. PSOMAS 7-7 October 2016 HB -665- Item 17. - 110 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 New Proiect No. 26: New Water Well #14 by McFadden Avenue and Gothard Street On April 6, 2015, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City quitclaimed a vacant property by McFadden Avenue and Gothard Street to the City for the purpose of constructing a new water well. The vacant property is within the City of Westminster, and preliminary discussions with Westminster staff have already begun for preliminary engineering and environmental documentation. The City is fortunate to be able to acquire this vacant property for it is located within a region deemed suitable for a water well. Another major benefit is that the site is large enough for future replacement wells on the same lot. The design capacity is estimated at around 2,000 to 2,500 gpm, offsetting the supply capacity that was recently lost from the well casing failure at Well #12. Well #12 was permanently capped and abandoned in 2015 (refer to Table 3-9 for history of active and abandoned water wells). New Project No. 27: New 1.3 Miles of 24-Inch to 30lnch Water Well Collection Transmission Main in Ex -NA VY Easement Right-of-Wav In early 2016, City staff completed a long process with the Federal Agency, General Service Administration (GSA), to have the City Council accept the transfer of the Ex - NAVY railroad easement and utility corridor, located near the northern end of the City limits. The entire easement is approximately 2.8 miles in length, with an average width of 75 feet, which is within the limits of both the City of Westminster (-1.5 miles) and the City (-1.3 miles). Also, similar to Project #26 above, the easterly region of this vacant right-of-way is located within an area deemed suitable for water wells. The westerly end of the easement is immediately adjacent to the City's existing reservoir site, making this an ideal site for high quality production wells, with a relatively short distance to transmit collected water to the City's reservoirs to meet daily water demands. Hence, the two proposed well projects (Nos. 28 and 29) are also recommended to be located within this right-of-way. New Proiect No. 28: New Water Well #15 by Edwards Street in Ex -NAVY Easement Right-of-Wav As described above under Project No. 27, the newly acquired Ex -NAVY railroad easement and utility corridor is an ideal right-of-way to build new water wells to meet the City's water demands, and to increase reliability with newer wells. This new Well #15 will be located within the easement limit, adjacent to Edwards Street, with plenty of area for future replacement wells. The projected design well capacity will be around 1,500 to 2,000 gpm, offsetting the accumulative gradual well capacity reductions from all remaining existing eight active water wells. New Proiect No. 29: New Water Well #16 by Goldenwest Street in Ex -NAVY Easement Right -of -Way This new well project is similar to Project No. 28, and will also be within the newly acquired Ex -NAVY railroad easement and utility corridor. The main difference is that Well # 16 will be constructed east of Well # 15 in the easement area owned by the City of Westminster, adjacent to Goldenwest Street. The projected design well capacity will be around 1,500 to 2,000 gpm, offsetting the accumulative gradual well capacity reductions from all remaining existing eight water wells. PCOMAS 7-8 October 2016 Item 17. - 111 H s -666- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 New Proiect No. 30: Peck Reservoir Site and Well #13 Security Improvements Peck Reservoir site contains many critical water facilities. Both Peck Reservoir and Springdale Reservoir, on this site, have a combined storage capacity of 26 million gallons, which is approximately 50 percent of City's entire above ground storage. Peck Booster Station provides pumping capacity of over 18,000 gpm to meet peak demands. Well #4, Well #7 and Well #13 located on this site have a combined pumping capacity of over 6,000 gpm. Finally, OC-35, the City's largest imported water connection with a capacity of 9,000 gpm terminates at the Peck Reservoir site. Security improvements will consist of adding new structures to secure the Well #13 infrastructure. In addition, new facilities will be added to secure the booster station, and the OC-35 import connection. There will be new state-of-the-art monitoring equipment to enhance security at this critical facility. New Proiect No. 31: Aging Water Main Replacement Program — Primarily Asbestos Cement Pipe and Other Aging Water Mains throughout the City Asbestos Cement Pipe (ACP) was commonly used around 50 years ago due to its competitive unit cost and because it was believed to be superior in resisting pipe corrosion. Unfortunately, studies have shown that ACP tends to become brittle with age, is prone to gradual loss in structural integrity from both high ground water on the outside, as well as permeation from the inside. Typical life expectancy of ACP is around 80 years. As of today, there are nearly 500 miles of ACP in the City's water system, primarily between 45 and 55 years old. This Aging Water Main Replacement Program will initially target older ACP in areas of highest groundwater level. The cost for this program assumes replacing five percent, or 25 miles, of this aging pipe over the next 20 years. New Proiect No. 32: Sunset Beach Water Main Replacement and Extension Proiect (Phase III) Phase III of Sunset Beach Water Main Replacement and Extension Project will replace undersized pipes, and construct several segments of new pipe extensions along Pacific Coast Highway, North Pacific Avenue, South Pacific Avenue and various other locations to improve operational flexibility and redundancy for fire protection purposes. Similar to Project No. 32, most of the undersized aging pipes in Sunset Beach are ACP, which are in areas prone to high groundwater. This project will install pipeline suitable for high groundwater conditions, improve water system hydraulics by constructing critical inter- connection pipelines at key locations, and construct additional valves required to isolate the existing water system for ease of maintenance and repair. New Proiect No. 33: 8-Inch Water Main Replacement in Coniunction with Federally Funded Admiralty Bridge Rehabilitation Proiect The Admiralty Drive Bridge is a multi -span steel I -girder bridge constructed in 1963. The bridge is approximately 52 feet wide (40 feet curb to curb), and approximately 155 feet long. The bridge provides one 12-foot wide lane in each direction for vehicular traffic. The bridge rehabilitation is being funded through the federal Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. Since the existing waterline has nearly reached its useful life and cannot be protected in place, replacing it during the bridge PSOMAS 7-9 HB -667- October 2016 Item 17. - 112 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 rehabilitation will be more cost effective than replacing the waterline as a separate stand- alone project. New Project No. 34: 8-Inch Water Main Replacement in Coniunction with Federally Funded Humboldt Bridge Rehabilitation & Widening Project The Humboldt Drive Bridge is a multi -span steel I -girder bridge constructed in 1963. The bridge is approximately 35 feet wide and approximately 156 feet long; it measures 26 feet curb to curb, which is below the minimum roadway width required for this bridge. The bridge provides one 13-foot lane in each direction for vehicular traffic. The rehabilitation and widening of the bridge are being funded through the federal Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. Since the existing waterline has nearly reached its useful life and cannot be protected in place, replacing it during the bridge rehabilitation will be more cost effective than replacing the waterline as a separate stand- alone project. New Proiect No. 35: OC-9 Steel 22-Inch Transmission Main Replacement by Newland Street for I-405 Widening The upcoming Orange County Transit Authority's I-405 Widening Project will require relocation of OC-9, a City owned 22-inch steel transmission main by Newland Street that was installed around 1955. A preliminary feasibility assessment recommended relocating the existing transmission main from underneath the freeway to the Newland Street Bridge that crosses over the freeway. To stay within Caltrans' design standard for utilities on bridges, a tentative plan is to install two parallel 16-inch pipes within casings in the reconstructed Newland Street Bridge as part of the freeway widening construction. Based on City staff s research of historical documents, the City has "prior rights" for the existing transmission main, therefore the Orange County Transit Authority has tentatively agreed to reimburse the City for all design and inspection costs, and will construct replacement casings/pipelines in conjunction with the freeway widening project. New Proiect No. 36: I2-Inch Distribution Main Replacement by Beach Blvd and Edinger Avenue for I-405 Widening The upcoming Orange County Transit Authority's I-405 Widening Project will require relocation of a City owned 12-inch distribution main by Beach Blvd and Edinger Avenue that was installed around 1958, and was relocated once around 1964. A preliminary feasibility assessment recommended relocating the existing distribution main from underneath the freeway to the Edinger Avenue Bridge that crosses over the freeway. To stay within Caltrans' design standard for utilities on bridges, a tentative plan is to install a 12-inch pipe within a casing in the reconstructed Edinger Avenue Bridge as part of the freeway widening efforts. Based on City staff s research of historical documents, City has "prior rights" for the existing distribution main, therefore the Orange County Transit Authority has tentatively agreed to reimburse the City for all design and inspection costs, and will construct a replacement casing/pipeline in conjunction with the freeway widening project. p£ O M A S 7-10 October 2016 Item 17. - 113 HB -668- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 New Proiect No. 37: 8-Inch Distribution Main Replacement by McFadden Avenue and Sugar Avenue for I-405 Widenin The upcoming Orange County Transit Authority's I-405 Widening Project will require relocation of a City owned 8-inch distribution main by McFadden Avenue and Sugar Avenue that was installed around 1963. A preliminary feasibility assessment recommended extending the existing pipe casing underneath the freeway by the McFadden Avenue Bridge and replacing the existing 8-inch distribution without a change in pipe alignment. Based on City staff s research of historical documents, City does not appear to have "prior rights" for the existing distribution main, therefore the Orange County Transit Authority will likely require the City to be financially responsible for all design and relocation costs, with the actual reconstruction of the existing casing/pipeline to be constructed in conjunction with the widening project. New Proiect No. 38: Water Well #6 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor and Color Removal Treatment System Water Well #6 is located near Gothard Street and Heil Avenue, was drilled around 1973, and has a design pumping capacity around 3,000 gpm. Well #6 is one of eight remaining active wells in the City. While design of new replacement wells are underway, it will be several years before any of those new wells are able to provide the existing distribution network with supplemental water supply. The existing well infrastructure at Well #6 is in good condition, but the production rate has been reduced by more than 50 percent because of customer complaints of odor from presence of Hydrogen Sulfide and color in the water. Similar to Project No. 24 for Well #9, testing and monitoring of various potential treatment options will be necessary prior to selection of a cost effective treatment process such as Granular Activated Carbon filter media to treat odor, and an additional treatment method to remove color. Upon completion of the recommended treatment system, Well #6 is expected to produce high quality water at full design capacity. New Project No. 39: Water Well #8 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor and Color Removal Treatment System Water Well #8 is located around Goldenwest Street and Warner Avenue, was drilled around 1978, and has a design pumping capacity over 3,000 gpm. While design of new replacement wells are underway, it will be several years before any of those new wells are able to provide the existing distribution network with supplemental water supply. The existing well infrastructure at Well #8 is in good condition, but the well has been taken out of service for many years because of customer complaints of odor from presence of Hydrogen Sulfide and color in the water. Similar to Project No. 39 for Well #6, testing and monitoring of various potential treatment options will be necessary prior to selection of a cost effective treatment process such as Granular Activated Carbon filter media to treat odor, and an additional treatment method to remove color. Upon completion of the recommended treatment system, Well #8 will be placed back in operation to produce high quality water at full design capacity. PSOMAS 7-11 October 2016 H B -669- Item 17. - 114 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 New Proiect No. 40: Talbert Lake Irrimation Proiect During the recent drought and due to the City's efforts to meet water conservation objectives, the City's Central Park has become significantly impacted. Approximately 120 acres of Central Park are piped with a separate irrigation system but are currently irrigated with potable water. Lower Talbert Lake, located west of the Central Library, captures all runoff within that tributary area. Average lake surface area is approximately 2 acres, and remains at a steady water level for the majority of the year. The objective of the Talbert Lake Irrigation Project is to supplement park irrigation with lake water, particularly in warmer months to help protect the health of trees and plants within the park. Preliminary water quality sampling concluded that Talbert Lake water is suitable for park irrigation. Upon completion of a pilot test to verify the lake's ability to sustain minimum water level during park irrigation, a gravity pipe and debris filtering system will be constructed from the northerly end of the lake to the existing irrigation booster station located adjacent to the Park Bench C66. The new infrastructure will have the flexibility to allow City maintenance staff to irrigate using either potable water or lake water. Lake water would only be utilized when sufficient quantities of water are available for irrigation while maintaining a minimum level in the lake. New Proiect No. 41: Groundwater Master Plan This 2016 Water Master Plan Update contains several new wells to replace losses experienced in groundwater pumping capacity due to aging well infrastructure or degradation in water quality. The useful life of water wells can vary greatly but is typically between 40 and 60 years. The Orange County Water District regulates the basin and dictates the Basin Pumping Percentage (BPP), which is subject to annual changes. Typically the City is allowed to produce a minimum of 60-70% of our potable water needs from the groundwater basin with OCWD's long-term goal to maintain a BPP of 75%. The balance of the City's potable water needs are purchased from our imported water wholesaler, MWDOC. Imported water is nearly three times the cost of well water, so it is in the City's best interest to have adequate well pumping capacity to provide groundwater to the annual BPP limit. The City also needs reliable water wells with surplus capacity to handle scenarios when existing wells are temporary removed from service for routine maintenance or if imported supplies are curtailed. The purpose of the Groundwater Master Plan is to capture all relevant data pertaining to existing active water wells, to estimate remaining useful life, and to identify an on -going water well replacement schedule, taking into account the fact that it takes many years to plan, acquire right-of-way, design, permit, equip and put a well into operation. New Proiect No. 42: Water Security Improvements at Well #3A Water Well #3A is located near Warner Avenue and Gothard Street, was drilled around 1994, and has a design pumping capacity around 2,500 gpm, but is currently operating at approximately 80 percent of that capacity. In 2015, a deeper section of the well was filled with concrete to deter lower quality water from entering into the pump column. This method was successful in improving water quality at a very reasonable cost; however, capping the lower section did decrease the well's ability to produce water at its original design capacity. The existing well infrastructure at Well #3A is in good condition. There P1C0MAS Item 17. - 115 7-12 October 2016 IOI:�:yll� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 will be new state-of-the-art monitoring equipment to enhance security at this critical facility. New Proiect No.43: Water Security Improvements at Well #6 Water Well #6 is located near Gothard Street and Heil Avenue, was drilled around 1973, and has a design pumping capacity around 3,000 gpm. The existing well infrastructure at Well #6 is in good condition. There will be new state-of-the-art monitoring equipment to enhance security at this critical facility. New Proiect No. 44: Water Security Improvements at Well #8 Water Well #8 is located near Goldenwest Street and Warner Avenue, was drilled around 1978, and has a design pumping capacity over 3,000 gpm. The existing well infrastructure at Well #8 is in good condition. There will be new state-of-the-art monitoring equipment to enhance security at this critical facility. New Proiect No. 45: Water Security Improvements at Well #9 Water Well #9 is located near Newland Street and Warner Avenue, was drilled around 1981, and has a design pumping capacity over 3,000 gpm. The existing well infrastructure at Well #9 is in good condition. There will be new state-of-the-art monitoring equipment to enhance security at this critical facility. New Proiect No. 46. Water Security Improvements at Well #10 Water Well #10 is located near Edinger Avenue and Beach Blvd, was drilled around 1981, and has a design pumping capacity around 3,400 gpm. The existing well infrastructure at Well #10 is in good condition. There will be new state-of-the-art monitoring equipment to enhance security at this critical facility. New Proiect No. 47. Annual Water Distribution System Improvements Program Typically on an annual basis, engineering and operation staff will evaluate and identify new projects in the category of distribution system improvements. The objectives of these improvements include increasing redundancy and reliability, increasing fire protection, improving circulation for water quality enhancement, and enhancing safety for operation staff. A few projects identified in this 2016 Water Master Plan Update could be categorized under this annual program, such as No. 16: Fire Protection Improvements; No. 23: Bolsa Chica 8-Inch Water Main Extension. However, additional projects that are currently unknown are anticipated to arise in the future and this annual funding is envisioned to cover those. New Proiect No. 48: Annual Water System Corrosion Control Program Typically on an annual basis, engineering and operation staff will evaluate and identify new projects in the category of corrosion control improvements. This is consistent with past Water Master Plan projects to apply corrosion control to City owned transmission mains within City limits, specifically OC-9, OC-44, and OC-35. To date, including corrosion control applied on the 20-inch Downtown Transmission Main Loop, approximately 16.5 miles of transmission mains have had cathodic protection installed to PSOMAS 7-13 October 2016 HB -671- Item 17. - 116 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 deter corrosion. The objective of these improvements is to prolong the life expectancy of metallic infrastructure, including but not limited to pipelines, fittings, and valves. Two projects identified in this Water Master Plan are also categorized under this annual program, they are No. 53: 8.6 Miles of OC-44 Transmission Main; No. 54: 5.3 Miles of OC-9 and 5.9 Miles of OC-35 Transmission Main. As with Project 48, this funding is for future, currently undefined projects of this nature. New Protect No. 49: Annual Water Production System Improvements Program Typically on an annual basis, engineering and operation staff will evaluate and identify new projects in the category of production system improvements. Task orders can be engineering feasibilities studies, design and construction projects. The objectives of these improvements include increasing system redundancy and reliability, increasing pumping efficiency, maintaining pumping capacity, and enhancing safety for operation staff. Some projects identified in this 2016 Water Master Plan Update are also categorized under this annual program, such as Well #1 Replacement; No. 24: Water Well #9 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor Removal Treatment System; No. 27: New Water Well #14. However, additional projects that are currently unknown are anticipated to arise in the future and this annual funding is envisioned to cover those. New Proiect No. 50: Water Master Plan and Financial Plan Update (Typically Every 5 Years Typically on a five (5) year cycle, the Water Master Plan and Financial Plan are updated to evaluate current projected infrastructure needs and available funds for capital improvement projects. Per City's Municipal Code, Section 14.12.040(B), "A Capital Surcharge to be charged monthly as may be determined by the City shall be set by resolution of the City Council. All monies collected as the Capital Surcharge shall be used for water projects that are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Water Master Plan adopted by the City Council." The 1995 Water Master Plan and Financial Plan Update outlined a substantial amount of costly water infrastructure needs, which eventually led to the City Council's adoption of a Capital Surcharge for approximately 12 years (City Resolution No. 6713). This 2016 Water Master Plan and Financial Plan Update similarly identifies a large number of costly critical water infrastructure requirements for the next 20 years. The Financial Plan addresses financial needs and recommends various approaches to funding projects such as use of a Capital Surcharge, similar to the one adopted in 1995. New Protect No. 51: Urban Water Manamement Plan (Typically Every 5 Years) Water agencies, such as the City, must update their Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years (for years ending with "0" and "5"), consistent with the requirements of the 1983 Urban Water Management Planning Act (Act). These updates detail each agency's efforts to ensure water supply reliability under a range of hydrologic conditions as well as comply with any new regulatory requirements under the Act. The UWMP plays a key role from the City's perspective to determine if adequate surplus water is available for future private developments. The UWMP will typically accomplish the following major objectives: P c 0 M A S Item 17. - 117 7-14 October 2016 HQ -672- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 • Evaluate the supplies necessary to meet demands over a 25-year period in normal year, single -year and multi -year droughts. • Document the stages of actions the agency would undertake to address up to 50% reduction in its water supplies. • Describe the actions to be undertaken in the event of a catastrophic interruption in water supplies. • Evaluate the water use efficiency measures to satisfy the requirements of California SBx7-7. New Proiect No. 52: 8.6 Miles of OC-44 Transmission Main, Between 16-Inch to 42- Inch, Corrosion Control Improvements through Mesa Water District As described under Project No. 21, OC-44 Pipeline was constructed in the 1960's, and is jointly owned by the Mesa Water District (58.6%) and the City (41.4%). Though nearly all of the existing 8.6 miles of transmission main does not have a history requiring leak repairs, it lacks cathodic protection, a proven cost effective corrosion control method to indefinitely protect metallic pipelines from corrosion. While the expensive "one-time" cost of this method requires welding of wires between metal pipe joints to create electrical continuity, the overall cost of rehabilitation has shown to be a small fraction of the cost of transmission main replacement. New Proiect No. 53: 5.3 Miles of OC-9 & 6.0 Miles of OC-35 Transmission Main, Between 24-Inch to 36-Inch, Corrosion Control Improvements through West Orange County Water Board As described under Project No. 25 and No. 26, 6.0 miles of OC-35 and 5.3 miles of OC-9 were constructed in 1963 and 1956, respectively. Both transmission mains, located outside of City limits, are jointly owned by the WOCWB. WOCWB is jointly owned by the City (52.5%), City of Westminster (25.4%), City of Seal Beach (14.3%), and City of Garden Grove (7.8%). While nearly all of the existing 11.3 miles of transmission main does not have a history needing leak repairs, it lacks cathodic protection, a proven cost effective corrosion control method to indefinitely protect metallic pipelines from corrosion. While the expensive "one-time" cost of this method requires welding of wires between metal pipe joints to create electrical continuity, the overall cost of rehabilitation has shown to be a small fraction of cost of transmission main replacement. New Protect No. 54: OC-44 San Diego Creek Crossing Pipeline Protection with Rip - Rap Scour Protection - Phase II After completion of Project No. 21, slip -lining the existing 42-inch OC-44 Pipeline with a new 30-inch diameter Ductile Iron earthquake resistant pipe, that section of new pipe across San Diego Creek is expected to once again be a reliable pipeline. However, this pipeline is lacking erosion or scour protection through the creek crossing section. This pipeline is vulnerable to damage from large flood events. Although large flood events are infrequent, there is still the probability that this pipeline will need to endure large scale flooding sometime during its remaining design life. Metropolitan Water District also maintains a transmission main crossing this creek, and their section of pipeline is encased in concrete Rip -Rap and shows no signs of erosion. Therefore, Phase II of this project, following Project No. 21, is to obtain necessary permits and funding to install concrete PSOMAS 7-15 October 2016 HB -673- Item 17. - 118 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 Rip -Rap to permanently protect the section of the pipeline crossing the creek from future erosion and scour. New Protect No. 55: Overmyer Booster Station Dual Energy Drive The Overmyer Booster Station is the largest of three Zone 1 booster stations that primarily maintains pressure and meets daily water demand in the heart of the City. The backbone of this booster station consists of two large natural gas engines, each over 400 horsepower and capable of delivering over 6,500gpm. Additionally, there are two more natural gas engines, each over 150 horsepower and capable of delivering around 3,500 gpm. Similar to Project No. 22, due to greater air quality concerns with natural gas driven engines, it has become increasingly difficult to satisfy South Coast Air Quality Management District's regulatory requirements. To address this challenge, the Overmyer Booster Station Dual Drive Project will convert the existing natural gas driven system into a dual drive hybrid system, having options to run by electricity or natural gas. This project will further increase reliability of this vital booster station, and also allow City's operation and maintenance team the flexibility to meet water demands while operating within regulatory requirements. New Protect No. 56: Peck Reservoir Roof Replacement The Peck Reservoir roof is showing signs of wear and will soon need to be replaced. Although replacing the existing roof with similar material is likely the most cost effective solution, a feasibility study will be performed with an objective to identify other potentially feasible alternatives to a new roof with a greater design life. New Project No. 57. Annual Water Facilities Security Improvements Program Typically on an annual basis, engineering and operation staff will evaluate and identify new projects in the category of facilities security improvements. Post-911, a Water System Vulnerability Assessment was performed in 2003 and various security features have been implemented. A number of projects identified in this Water Master Plan are also categorized under this annual program, such as No. 31: Peck Reservoir Site and Well #13 Security Improvements; No. 43: Water Security Improvements at Well #3A. However, additional projects that are currently unknown are anticipated to arise in the future and this annual funding is envisioned to cover those. p 1Z 0 M A S 7-16 October 2016 Item 17. - 119 HB -674- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Table 7-3 Estimated Costs for New Water Master Plan Projects New Project # Project Name Estimated Design FY Estimated Design Cost'" Estimated Construct. FY Estimated Construction Costa•` Total Estimated Cost Program Category 21 OC-44 Sliplining 30" at Creek Crossingd NA - 2017 $ 1,035,000 $ 1,035,000 Replacement 22 Peck Reservoir Dual Drive & Well 7 Security' NA 2017 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Production 23 Bolsa Chica 8" Water Main Extensiond NA - 2018 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Distribution 24 Well 9 1-12S Odor Treatmentd NA 2017-18 $ 2,300,000 $ 2,300,000 1 Production 25 WOCWB OC-35 Relocate 33" for 1-405 Widening 2017 $ 210,000 2018-19 $ 1,575,0D0 $ 1,785,000 Replacement 26 New Well 14 by McFadden/Gothard 2017 $ 750,000 2018-19 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,000,000 Production 27 1.3 Miles of 24" to 30" Well Collection Line 2020 $ 5D0,000 2021-22 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,000,000 Distribution 28 New Well 15 in Ex -Nary Easement by Edwards 2020 1 $ 750,D00 2021-22 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,000,000 Production 29 New Well 16 in Ex -Navy Easement by Edwards 2022 $ 750,000 2023-24 $ 4,250,000 $ 5,000,000 Production 30 Security at Peck Reservoir & Well 13 2019 $ 100,000 2020 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 Security 31 Aging Pipe Replacement (Incl. 5% of AC Pipe) Annual $ 7,500,000 Annual e $ 25,000,000 $ 32,500,000 1 Replacement 32 Sunset Beach Water Main Replacement Ph Illd NA 2019 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Replacement 33 8" Pipe Replacement Admiralty Bridge Rehab 2017 $ 25,000 2018 $ 75,000 $ 100,000 Replacement 34 8" Pipe Replacement Humboldt Bridge Rehab 2017 1 $ 25,000 2018 $ 75,000 $ 100,000 Replacement 35 OC-9 Replace 22" for 1-405 Widen (OCTA Pays) 2017 2018 - Replacement 36 12" Pipe Replace for 1-405 Widen (OCTA Pays) 2017 2018 - Replacement 37 8" Pipe Replace for 1-405 Widen by Sugar 2017 $ 75,000 1 2019 $ 400,000 $ 475,000 1 Replacement 38 Water Well 6 H25 Odor & Color Treatment 2019 $ 500,000 2020-21 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,000,000 Production 39 Water Well 8 1-12S Odor & Color Treatment 2023 $ 500,000 2024-25 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,000,000 Production 40 Talbert Lake Irrigation Project 2018 $ 150,000 2020 $ 600,000 $ 750,000 Production 41 Groundwater Master Plan 2025 $ 150,000 NA - $ 150,000 Study 42 Security at Well 3A 2025 $ 50,000 2026 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 1 Security 43 Security at Well 6 2027 $ 50,000 2028 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 Security 44 Security at Well 8 2029 $ 50,000 2030 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 Security 45 Security atWell 9 2031 $ 50,000 2032 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 Security 46 Security at Well 30 2033 $ 50,000 2034 $ 100,000 $ 150,000 Security 47 Water Distribution Improvements Annual e $ 200,000 Annual e $ 2,000,000 $ 2,200,000 Distribution 48 Water System Corrosion Control Annual e $ 100,000 Annual e $ 1,000,000 $ 1,100,000 Corrosion 49 Water Production System Improvements Annual e $ 200,000 1 Annual e $ 2,000,000 $ 2,200,000 Production 50 WMP and Financial Plan Updates Every 5 Yrs $ 200,000 NA $ 200,000 Study 51 Urban Water Management Plans Every 5 Yrs $ 200,000 NA $ 200,000 Study 52 8.6 Miles OC-44 Corrosion Controld NA 2028-29 1 $ 4,140,000 $ 4,140,000 Corrosion 53 WOCWB OC-35 & OC-9 Corrosion Control 2032 $ 105,000 2033-34 $ 3,307,500 $ 3,412,500 Corrosion 54 OC-44 Scour Protection 30" at Creek Crossing 2024 $ 41,400 2025 $ 621,000 $ 662,400 Replacement 55 Overmyer Booster Station Dual Drive 2030 $ 300,000 2031-32 $ 1,700,000 $ 2,000,000 Production 56 Peck Reservoir Roof Replacement 2032 $ 300,000 2033-34 $ 1,700,000 $ 2,000,000 Production Water Facilities Security Improvements Annual e $ 300,0D0 Annual e $ 400,000 $ 500,0D0 Security y n57 Total $ 13,981,400 $ 75,978,500 $ 89,859,900 a) Cost estimates as of Nov 2015 (LA ENR = 10092). Escalation of design and construction costs will be accounted for in Financial Plan. b) Design Costs range from 5 to 15% of construction costs, depending on project size and complexity and include preliminary design, final design, potholing, geotechnical, survey, and bidding services. c) Construction Costs include construction management and City project management. Construction management costs range from 2.5 to 5%of construction costs for shop drawings, RFIs, field visits, etc., but do not include inspection services. City project management costs range from 5 to 9% of construction costs and may include inspection services depending on the project type. d) Design already complete or costs encumbered. e) Amount shown is the sum of 20 years. PSOMAS HB -675- Item 17. - 120 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 7.4 Improvement Projects Categorized Into 6 Programs All 44 improvement projects and programs identified and described above are divided into 6 Capital Improvement Water Programs with recommended phasing over the next 20 years and an estimated uninflated total cost of $128.2 Million. They are as follows: • Water System Corrosion Control - 3 Projects/Programs - $8.7 Million • Water Distribution System Improvements - 7 Projects/Programs - $19.2 Million • Water Main Replacements - 10 Projects/Programs - $38.7 Million • Water Production System Improvements -14 Projects/Programs - $59.2 Million • Water Facilities Security Improvements - 7 Projects/Programs - $1.9 Million • Water Engineering Studies - 3 Studies/Programs - $550, 000 7.4.1 Water System Corrosion Control The Water System Corrosion Control Program consists of extending the life of existing buried metallic infrastructure such as pipelines, valves, fittings, and appurtenances. The annual capital improvement projects for water would combine all similar projects into this program for budgeting purposes. The City also performs annual evaluations and testing of all metallic pipelines and will make any necessary adjustments, enhancements and improvements, based on the results of these activities. 7.4.2 Water Distribution System Improvements The Water Distribution System Improvements Program consists of expanding and improving the existing distribution system, with the exception of complete replacements of small to large diameter pipelines. This program also includes water main extension projects to improve hydraulic circulation and system redundancy. The annual capital improvement projects would combine all similar projects into this program for budgeting purposes. 7.4.3 Water Main Replacements All improvement projects that are directly related to replacing aging water mains, both large and small diameters, are grouped into this Water Main Replacements Program. The long-term plan for this program is to gradually replace aging water infrastructure consisting primarily of old asbestos cement (AC) pipelines. The annual capital improvement projects would combine all similar projects into this program for budgeting purposes. 7.4.4 Water Production System Improvements All improvement projects that are directly related to production facilities, such as water wells, reservoirs, booster stations, treatment facilities, and import connections are grouped into this Water Production System Improvements Program. Many high priority PCOMAS 7-18 October 2016 Item 17. - 121 HB -676- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 7 projects identified in Chapter 7 are part of this program, such as new water wells and odor treatment facilities. The annual capital improvement projects for water would combine all similar projects into this program for budgeting purposes. 7.4.5 Water Facilities Security Improvements All improvement projects that are directly related to improving and enhancing security at all production facilities, such as water wells, reservoirs, booster stations, treatment facilities, and imported water connections are grouped into this Water Facilities Security Improvements Program. In 2003, the City performed a vulnerability assessment study at various production facilities and identified the need for security improvements varying from new security switches, to high-tech cameras and new structures. The annual capital improvement projects for water would combine all similar projects into this program for budgeting purposes. 7.4.6 Water Engineering Studies The Water Engineering Studies Program consists of preparing studies such as Water Master Plan Updates, Urban Water Management Plans, a Groundwater Master Plan, or other unique studies serving planning purposes. Both Water Master Plan Updates and Urban Water Management Plans are typically accomplished on a 5-year cycle. 7.5 Recommendations for Additional Studies Section 3.3.9 of this Water Master Plan recommends a future extensive well study, Groundwater Master Plan, to assess the condition of each of the City's existing wells, determine their remaining useful life, and develop a systematic approach to replacement of wells in their same general location and/or the addition of new wells at future locations. Because the potential desalination project would include construction of a storage reservoir and booster pump station, new projects identified from this Water Master Plan Update, including those that may arise from future studies, could be funded from the savings generated from deleting these two major projects from the City's Water Master Plan projects, or through savings from any of the other remaining Water Master Plan projects above. PSOMAS 7-19 October 2016 HB -677- Item 17. - 122 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 8 8 ASSET MANAGEMENT — TWENTY YEAR AND IMMEDIATE NEEDS An essential component of a Water Master Plan is an Asset Management Plan with a goal of securing a long-term, reliable water infrastructure system to service the customers of the City's water service area. Water is a valuable resource and requires a complex water infrastructure system to supply, store, and distribute it at adequate pressure to meet daily water demands and fire protection requirements. As shown in Table 4-13, it would cost over $1.4 billion to construct the City's water system in today's dollars. Since various components of the water infrastructure system will have a limited useful life, it is vital for the City to invest in on -going annual maintenance and capital improvement programs for long-term sustainability of a reliable water infrastructure system. 8.1 Twenty Year Capital Improvement Needs A priority list that combines Tables 7-2 and 7-3 identifies 44 necessary capital improvement projects and programs for the next 20 years. Total cost in today's dollars is estimated $128.2 million. This equates to approximately 9% of the cost of the water system over 20 years, or only around 0.5% annually. From the perspective of typical asset management, expending only 0.5% annually to maintain a water system is considered to be extremely efficient. City staff is separately preparing the 2016 Financial Plan Update, to evaluate various funding options to meet the long term needs from this water master plan update. 8.2 Immediate Capital Improvement Needs Table 8-1 below is a list of 14 high priority capital improvement projects and programs that have been identified for FY 2016/17. Upon adoption of the 2016 Water Master Plan by City Council, City staff would be able to utilize existing Water Master Plan Fund balance of approximately $28.1 million (as of October 1, 2016) toward these projects that totaled $6.6 million. There still will remain a healthy fund balance of $21.5 million after allocating a portion of the Water Master Plan Fund to construct the 14 high priority projects. Although the current fund balance does not meet the financial needs over next 20 years, having this fund balance of $28.1 million will immediately sustain the construction of priority water infrastructure and provide staff with valuable time to complete the Financial Study. It also will also provide City Council with the time to evaluate the financial options from the draft Financial Plan, once completed. cs +c 0 M A S 8-1 October 2016 Item 17. - 123 Hg -678- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Master Plan Update Chapter 8 Table 8-1 Estimated Costs for 14 Water Master Plan Projects (FY 2016/17) WMP Project # Project Name Total Estimated Cost Program Category 1 Beach Blvd. Pipeline Imps. $ 700,000 Distribution NA Well 1 Replacement $ 1,250,000 Production 21 OC-44 SI i pl i ni ng 30" at Creek Crossing $ 1,035,000 Replacement 22 Peck Reservoir Dual Drive& Well 7 Security $ 1,500,000 Production 24 Well 9 H2S Odor Treatment $ 1,000,000 Production 25 WOCWBOC-35 Relocate 33" for 1-405 Widening $ 210,000 Replacement 26 New Well 14 by McFadden/Gothard $ 500,000 Production 33 8" Pipe Replacement Admiralty Bridge Rehab $ 25,000 Replacement 34 8" Pipe Replacement Humboldt Bridge Rehab $ 25,000 Replacement 37 8" Pipe Replacefor 1-405 Widen by Sugar $ 75,000 Replacement 47 Water Distribution Improvements $ 110,000 Distribution 48 Water System Corrosion Control $ 5S,000 Corrosion 49 Water Production System Improvements $ 110,000 Production 57 Water Facilities Security Improvements $ 25,000 Security Total $ 6,620,000 PSOMAS 8-2 October 2016 HB -679- Item 17. - 124 ATTACHMENT #5 City of Huntington Beach 2016 WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE Importance of Water System Wells eservoir ump , * Pipes = Hydrants Meters Stations Ft . Foods Health Economy ,, ecreation Aest etic Fire Protection ► 3 EMERGENCY Future Vital Services Drinking Cost To Replace Our Water Infrastructure? 4 Reservoirs/Tank 3 Zone 1 Boosters 2 Zone 2 Boosters $110 M 611 Miles of Large & Distribution Mains $900 M ►, 10 Wells (8 Active) $50 M ,A� Import Connections 5M IF 2 Miles of Shared Large Mains $80 M Cost To Replace Our Water Infrastructure? (Con't) 53,091 Meter Connectior $220 M j 5,801 Public Hydrants $29 M Over $1.4 Billion, Yard, Trucks, Equipment, etc $20 M r � r. 179749 Large Valves $20 M Water Master Plan Need and Purpose it . New Reservoirs & Booster Stations Treatment and Improvements Maintain a Reliable Water Infrastructure e New Wells Corrosion • • I "L, . J / Main Replacements and Extensions Transmission Main Replacement and New Financially Sustainable into the Future Examples of Aging Infrastructure €F OC-44 Lost 2 of 10 Wei Ss,) U: Leak Repair I 4 Sunset Beach Main Extensions & Replacements "U'k.'"i I/ 405 Fwy Widening Old AC & Cast Ironx { � ., -Water Odor Pipe Replacement ���►li;i 4fit3„,,, .�<<. Treatment WMP ddressesstrij�ctu What Topics are Covered in the Water Master Plan? 1. City Characteristics 2. Water Demand and Projected Growth 4. Facilities & Operation 5. Storage & Emergency Supply 3. Supply & Reliability 6. Hydraulic Modeling What Topics are Covered in the Water Master Plan? (Con't) i t i 7. Capital Improvement Program V A�IIrllUllr�z� 8. Asset Management Highlight of Completed WMP Projects Since 1995 Corrosion Control 10 Miles of Transmission Main M$6.7M New 3.5 Miles of OC-9 Transmission Main -$7.8M Overmyer Booster/ Reservoir Renovation 20 MG -$7.SM Chlorine Tank Containment . At Well 6, 7, 9, 10 & 13 -$1M or Downtown Cast Iron Main U Replacement 7 Miles-$12.1M Water Well 12 -$2.5M New Springdale + Southeast Reservoir ��— Reservoir 9 MG -$7M U Site Acquired 4.5 Acres-$o.4nn Total Value of $63M WMP Project Categories & Costs (7 Existing from 2012 WMP + 37 New from 2016 WMP = 44 Projects/Programs) Production 14 Corrosion Control 3 y�- Main Replacement 10 .r Security ,, { Distribution a, 7 Studies 44Projects/Prog rams at a value of $128.2MOver 20 Years Strategic Planning Goal: Enhance and maintain infrastructure Immediate Needs The 2016 Water Master Plan Update Identifies the Following Projects & Programs as Highest Priority Production Main ,film Distribution LIMReplacement IML } Corrosion A Control 14 Immediate Needs $6.6 Mi For FY 2016/17 CIP Water Master Plan Fund Balance $21.5 M Remaining $6.6 M --- ; ---- -, New $28.1 M Projects (Current) Total Cost Fund Balance (as of`10/1/2015) Recommendation City Council to Adopt The 2016 Water Master Plan Millions Future Water Master Plan Fund Needs $154.4 M Projected Deficit Over 20 Years $28.1 M (Current) .z If Water Master Plan is Adopted Staff will return in the future with a Financial Plan to evaluate several funding scenarios for future projects identified in the Water Master Plan Questions? "' _ .wr �• ` r a w. Y• I c 1 ra w, a, �Y.. Infrastructure Percentages - Water � _---- -- /J o Buildings 19 /0 25% Sewer 11% >rm Drairf�-- ' 7 0 r� i WATER WELL MAINTENANCE Are 950'DEEP FOR SOME HB WELLS WELL SCREENS WELL DETAILS i PERFORATED CASING/SCREENS GRAVEL PACK CCTV INSPECTION Huh � • DOWNHOLE VIEW s K a A SIDE VIEW _w POORLY MAINTAINED WELL Clogged Louvers from Precipitationr,. of Minerals 22 CAUSES OF WELL PROBLEMS • Incrustation From Mineral Deposits • Physical Plugging of Aquifer By Sediment • Sand Pumping • Bio-fouling By the Growth of Microorganisms • Well Screen or Casing Corrosion Before and after REHABILITATION activities { 3efore _ ,._ ,�