Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hearing - Zoning Text Amendment 97-3 - Negative Decla J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL REGARDING ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVED ITEM DATE:1Q,rzj 201, /9 98 TO: N=Aa E. 14o�/C�6 ATTENTION: Mr. Name 6—( war /1/Pu�oor� /0�d /LZ DEPARTMENT: Street Alea/ -P 9z6/0 REGARDING: Pi.�J/iG HP�I^ir�a - City,State,Zip Gen 1Daz a*#-e See Attached Action Agenda Item -/g a -In Date of Approval 3-16-98 Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Item For Your Records. Connie Brockway City Clerk Attachments: Action Agenda Page /3 Agreement Bonds Insurance RCA Deed Other Remarks: CC: N� "lY Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Risk Management Department Insurance Copy G:Fol l owup/agrmts/transltr 1 Telephone:714.536-5227) (13) 03/16/98.-.Council/Agency Agenda - Page 13 G-1 B. (City Council)Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 -Adoption Of Ordinance No. 3388 - '-General Day Care— (450.20) Adopt Ordinance No. 3388 - `An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Section 210.04 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Pertaining to General Day Care Uses." Submitted by the Community Development Director (Public hearing and introduction held on March 2, 1998). Recommended Action: After City Clerk reads by title, adopt Ordinance No. 3388, by roll call vote. [Adopted 7-01 G-1C. (City Council) City Initiated Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 -Zone Change - Adoption Of Ordinance No. 3389 - n/w Corner Bushard Street & Indianapolis Avenue-20471 Bushard Street—(450.20) Adopt Ordinance No. 3389 - `An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Amending District Map 7(Sectional District Map 7-6-10) to Rezone the Real Property Generally Located on the Northwest Comer of Indianapolis Avenue and Bushard Street from CG- FP2(General Commercial-Flood Plain Overlay District 2) to RL (Low Density Residential-Flood Plain Overlay District 2) (Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3)." Submitted by the Community Development Director (Public hearing held on March 2, 1998). Recommended Action: After City Clerk reads by title, adopt Ordinance No. 3389, by roll call vote. [Adopted 7-01 -2. Ordinances For Introduction G-2A. Council Introduction Of Ordinance No. 3392 -Code Amendment No. 98-1 Arne Munici al Code Section 2.32.030 a Pertaining To The Enforcement Of The State 0k!ng Law by Code Enforcement Officers—(640.10)Approve Introduction of inance No. 3392- "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Pertaining to Powers and Duties of Departure f Community Development." Recommended Action: A City Clerk reads by Title, approve introduction of Ordin a No. 3392, by roll call vote. [Introduction Approved- 6-1 (fulien: G-213. (City Council Introduction Of Ordinance No. 3390 - educin-q The Utility Tax Late Payment Penalty—(640.10) "An Ordinance of the City o t/ngton Beach Amending Chapter 3.36 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Pertainin the Collection Procedures for the Utility Users Tax." Submitted by the eputy Ci ministrator- Administrative Services Director Recommended Action: After City Clerk reads by title, approve introductio Ordinance No. 3390, by roll call vote. [Introduction Approved- 7-0] (13) T T K P, PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. ` County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a I . PUBLIC NOTICE ION FILE: A copy-otih`e proposed request is on file resident of the County aforesaid; I am REVISED in the Community Develop- NOTICE OF ment Department, 2000 PUBLIC HEARING Main Street, Huntington, over the age of eighteen years, and not a I BEFORE THE CITY Beach, California,' 92648,' COUNCIL OF THE 'for inspection by the pub-- party to or interested in the below lic. A copy of the staff re- CITY OF port will be available to in-' entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of HUNTINGTON BEACH terested parties at City Hall. NOTICE IS HEREBY or the Main City Library i GIVEN that on Monday, 7111 Talbert Avenue) after the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a r March 2, 1998, at 7:00 PM February 26,1998. newspaper of general circulation, printed in the City Council Chaim. ALL INTERESTED PER- bers, 2000 Main Street, SONS are invited to attend and published in the City of Huntington Huntington Beach, the City said hearing and express Council will hold a.public opinions -or submit ,evi- Beach County of Orange State of hearing on the following apple for or against the r r itZO application as outlinedNING MAP AMEND- above. If you challenge the, California, and that attached Notice is a MENT NO. 97-3:Applicant: City Council's action In Marko E. Botich Request: court, you may be limited, true and complete copy as was printed To permit "General Day to raising only those issues Care" uses within the RL you or someone else (Low Density Residential) raised at the public hearing and published in the Huntington Beach District.Location:City Wide described in this notice, or, J a,.• Project• Planner: Amy in written correspondence, anU Fountain Valley IS$Ue$ Of said Wolfe;and delivered to the City at, or newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: ZONING MAP AMEND- Prior the public hearing.: MENT NO. 97-3:Applicant: If there are any further City-of Huntington Beach questions please call the Request: A zone change Planning Division at 536 for the property located at 5271 and refer to the. 20471 Bushard Street from above item. Direct, your, CG (General Commercial) written communications to, to RL (Low Density Resi- the City Clerk. February 26, 1998 dential). Location: 20471 Connie Brockway,, Bushard ,Street (northwest City Clerk, City of Hun-1 !corner of Bushard Street tington Beach, 2000' and Indianapolis Avenue). Main Street,2nd Floor, Project Planner:Amy Wolfe Huntington Beach, Cal.. NOTICE IS HEREBY lfornia 92648 (714) GIVEN that an initial envi- 5ornia 7 ronmental assessment - I declare, under penalty of perjury, that (Negative Declaration No. Published Huntington' 97-18) for the above items Beach-Fountain. Valley In- the foregoing is true and correct. was processed and corn- dependent February 26,1 pleted in accordance with 1998 024-046 the California Quality Act.It was determined that the above items, with mitiga- tion, would not have any Executed on February 26 1998 significant environmental effects and that a mitigated at Costa Mesa California. negative declaration Is war- t ranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community -Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public Inspection and com- ment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by fete- Phontng_(714)536-5271__ I Signature Council/Agency Meeting Held: �f50 b Deferred ontinu t ®App�roive Conditio Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: March 2, 1998 Department ID Number: CD98-9 3�ic�/R g A"srED 7-0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, Acting City Administrator 470J `n PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 97-3, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-3 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-18 (GENERAL DAY CENTERS/ADSOC ADULT DAY CARE CENTER). Ott. A10, Y J38 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status, !dr Statement of Issue: Transmitted for City Council's consideration is: 1) Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 and Negative Declaration No. 97-18 which represent a request by Marko E. Botich to amend Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO) to allow General Day Care uses within the RL (Low Density Residential) zoning district; and 2) Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 which represents a city initiated request to rezone an 1.03 acre site at 20471 Bushard Street from CG-FP2 (General Commercial-Flood Plain Overlay District 2) to RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential-Flood Plain Overlay District 2). On January 27, 1998 the Planning Commission approved the aforementioned requests with a 6-0 vote. The Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval of the requests because the proposed change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan which encourage the development of institutional uses and service uses that support the City's residents within residential areas. (Recommended Action) Funding Source: Not applicable. • REQUEST FOR ACTION • MEETING DATE: March 2, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-9 Recommended Action: A. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: 1. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-18 with findings and mitigation measures (ATTACHMENT NO. 9)", and 2. "Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 with findings (ATTACHMENT NO. 1) and adopt Ordinance No. _(ATTACHMENT NO. 2)." 3. "Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 with findings (ATTACHMENT NO. 4) and adopt Ordinance No. (ATTACHMENT NO. 5)." Planninq Commission Action on January 27, 1995: THE MOTION MADE BY BIDDLE, SECONDED BY KERINS, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-18 AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 97-3 WITH FINDINGS (ATTACHMENT NO. 1) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENGOOD, BIDDLE, CHAPMAN, KERINS, TILLOTSON, INGLEE NOES: NONE ABSENT: SPEAKER ABSTAIN: NONE THE MOTION MADE BY BIDDLE, SECONDED BY CHAPMAN, TO APPROVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-18 AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-3 WITH FINDINGS (ATTACHMENT NO. 4) CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: LIVENGOOD, BIDDLE, CHAPMAN, KERINS, TILLOTSON, INGLEE NOES: NONE ABSENT: SPEAKER ABSTAIN: NONE MOTIONS PASSED Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. ""Continue Negative Declaration No. 97-18, Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 and direct staff accordingly." 2. "Deny Negative Declaration No. 97-18, Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 with findings for denial." CD98-9.DOC -2- 02/24/98 3:41 PM • REQUEST FOR ACTION • MEETING DATE: March 2, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-9 Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: 1. Marko E. Botich (ZTA) 2. City of Huntington Beach (ZMA) Location: 1. City-wide 2. 20471 Bushard Street (NW corner of Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue) 1. Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 represents a request to permit General Day Care uses within RL (Low Density Residential) zoning districts. The General Day Care use classification is defined in section 204.08 of the ZSO as follows: "Provision of non-medical care for 13 or more persons on a less than 24 hour basis. This classification includes nursery schools, preschools and day-care centers for children and adults." A legislative draft of the proposed amendment (ATTACHMENT NO. 3) has been prepared. 2. Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 represents a request to rezone an 1.03 acre parcel from CG-FP2 (Commercial General-Flood Plain Overlay District 2) to RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential-Flood Plain Overlay District 2). The Zoning Map Amendment will bring into conformance the zoning and RL (Residential Low Density) General Plan Land Use designation for the site. B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION: A conditional use permit (CUP No. 97-55) for the development of a 20,000 sq. ft. adult day care center at 20471 Bushard Street as well as the subject zoning text amendment (ZMA No. 97-3) and zoning map amendment (ZMA No. 97-3) were considered at the January 27, 1998 Planning Commission meeting. The applicant and representatives for the Adult Day Services of Orange County (ADSOC) adult day care center (ZMA No. 97-3) spoke in favor of the subject proposals. There were two people who testified against the proposed adult day care project (CUP No. 97-55). The Commission's discussion on the zoning text amendment addressed the issue of net versus gross lot size area pertaining to the recommended 1.0 acre (min.) development standard. The Commission's discussion on the zoning map amendment addressed the consistency between the proposed zoning and existing General Plan Land Use designation of Residential Low Density (RL) on the project site. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Zoning Text Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment because the proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of RL (Residential Low Density) with surrounding zoning and the existing and proposed development in the area. In addition, the proposed zoning text amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan which encourage the development of institutional uses and service uses that support resident's needs within residential neighborhoods. CD98-9.DOC -3- 02/24/98 3:41 PM • REQUEST FOR ACTION • MEETING DATE: March 2, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-9 It should be noted that Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 was not appealed and is not part of th request before City Council. The conditional use permit will not become effective until the Zoning Map Amendment and Zoning Text Amendment are approved in effect. C. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Text Amendment General Day Care uses are considered Public-Semipublic uses and are currently permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit in multiple-family residential zones, commercial, industrial and Public-Semipublic zoning districts without any special locational site criteria. They are not currently permitted within the RL (Low Density Residential) zoning district. Prior to the adoption of the 1994 ZSO, General Day Care uses were considered Unclassified Uses and were permitted within all residential and commercial zones including single family residential zones, subject to approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission (Attachment No.7) pursuant to the Ordinance Code. The subject land use was not included in the permitted or conditionally permitted land use matrix for single family residential districts in the 1994 zoning code update due to concerns relating to potential impacts of general day care uses on residential uses. The subject zoning text amendment proposes to reinstate General Day Care uses within single family residential zones subject to review and approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. Staff believes that the request should be supported, but on a limited basis, subject to site location and development criteria. It is recommended that only parcels of 1.0 acre (gross acreage) or greater in size with frontage on an arterial highway be considered for development with General Day Care uses in the RL zoning district. The aforementioned limitations are intended to control the scale of future development within single family residential areas and advocate development that would convey the physical and visual scale and character of the residential structures. Restricting development of General Day Care uses on parcels fronting neighborhood "edges" (arterials) minimize impacts to core residential areas and will serve to address the concerns raised in the 1994 zoning code update. The proposal, as modified to include the site and location criteria will be consistent with General Plan goals, objectives and policies which encourage land use diversity and advocate development of institutional uses within all residential areas when such uses are designed and developed so as to convey the character of residential structures. General Day Care uses provide a community benefit and are neighborhood serving uses. They offer unique services to residents and can be compatible with low density residential neighborhoods. CD98-9.DOC -4- 02/24198 3:41 PM • REQUEST FOR ACTION i MEETING DATE: March 2, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-9 The proposal to include General Day Care uses within single family residential areas is also consistent with land use policies and zoning of other municipalities in Orange County. Staff conducted a survey and found that the cities of Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Santa Ana and Westminster permit General Day Care uses within single family residential areas subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Zoning Map Amendment The proposed zone change for the property located at 20471 Bushard Street would bring the existing non-conforming zoning on the site into conformance with the existing General Plan land use designation. The proposed zoning map amendment from CG-FP2 (General Commercial-Flood Plain Overlay District 2) to RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential-Flood Plain Overlay District 2) is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of RL (Residential Low Density) for the property and with existing uses in the area. The properties adjacent to the project site (east, west, north and south) are zoned for low density residential development (ATTACHMENT NO. 6). The proposed zone change in conjunction with the aforementioned zoning text amendment (ZTA No. 97-3) request would allow for the development of general day care uses on the subject property, in accordance with RL (Residential Low Density) development standards and implement land use goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. Environmental Status: Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design and engineering. Subsequently, Negative Declaration No. 97-18 (Attachment No. 9) was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the ZSO and the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The negative declaration analyzes the zoning text amendment, zoning map amendment, conditional use permit and variance associated with the proposed project. The Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 97-18 for twenty (20) days commencing on November 27, 1997 and ending on December 17, 1997. Comments were received from the City of Huntington Beach Environmental Review Board (Attachment No. 10) concerning transportation/circulation, biological resources and cultural resources issues addressed in Environmental Assessment No. 97-18 and a response has been included (Attachment No. 10). Prior to any action on Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 97- 18. Staff is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings and mitigation measures. I CD98-9.DOC -5- 02/24/98 3:41 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: March 2, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD98-9 D. SUMMARY: Staff has evaluated Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97- 3 and determined that the subject requests will implement General Plan land use goals and will result in the development of the site in accord with development standards applicable to properties within the immediate vicinity, thus yielding improvements compatible with the nature and residential character of the area. Staff recommends approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 for the following reasons: ♦ The proposed text amendment will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. ♦ Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan which encourage the development of institutional uses and services that support the City's residents within residential neighborhoods. ♦ The subject text amendment would not permit development which would be detrimental to the property or uses within the City in general. Uses will be compatible with residential development based on site criteria. ♦ The proposed map amendment is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of RL (Residential Low Density), with surrounding zoning and the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area. Attachment(s): NumberCity Clerk's Page . Description 1 Findings for Approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 2 Ordinance No. :Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 3 Legislative Draft Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 4 Findings for Approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 5 Ordinance No :Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 6 Zoning Map and General Plan land use designations 7 Pre 1994 Ordinance Code Provision for General Day Care uses 8 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated January 27, 1997 9 Negative Declaration No. 97-18 10 Environmental Review Board comments and Staff response on Negative Declaration No. 97-18 RCAAuthor: MF.HZ.SH:AW CD98-9.DOC -6- 02/24/98 3:41 PM ATTACHMENT 1 - 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 97-3/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO, 97-18 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-18: 1. Negative Declaration No. 97-18 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of twenty (20) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Negative Declaration and Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3. 2. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission, that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO, 97-3: 1. Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 to allow General Day Care uses within the RL (Low Density Residential) zoning district, on lots 1.0 acre (gross acreage)or greater fronting an arterial, subject to approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission is consistent with Land Use Element goal (LU7) and associated objective (LU7.1) and policy(LU7.1.1) as well as objective (LU9.4) and policy (LU9.4.1)because it would augment development of institutional uses and services that support the needs of Huntington Beach residents within residential neighborhoods while maintaining the City's scale and character. The conditional use permit requirement will enable specific site plan review to incorporate conditions to ensure the physical design(building layout, parking, landscaping etc.) and operations are compatible with surrounding land uses. 2 A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The new zoning text will permit new facilities to be developed and provide services which have been previously offered to residents in the vicinity. It will also ensure development that is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 3 Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. The proposed zoning text amendment would encourage development of the site in accord with recently adopted RL (Low Density Residential) zoning development standards. Attachment- 1/27/98 (98SR07-7) ATTACHMENT 2 PUBLIC NPa�-"✓G �fzl�i' ZY7;F pvLP non/ 312-1-7k ORDINANCE NO. 3 3 8 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 210.04 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO GENERAL DAY CARE USES The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That Section 210.04 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended to permit General Day Care uses within RL districts, on lots 1.0 acre(gross acreage)or greater fronting an arterial,subject to approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting held thereof on the 16th day of March 21998 — zctm� ATTEST: Mayor 4�< `G APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk '4. 4�z� REVIEWED AND APPROVEDCity Attorney IATIATED AND APPROVED: City—AdmSi strator Director of Comm 'ty Development 7/k/ordinance/dayc=010/98 Ord. No. 3388 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd of March, 1998, and was again read to said City Council at a regglar meeting thereof held on the 16th of March, 1998, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Julien, Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Independent on ,19 In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officio Jerk Connie Brockway City Clerk of the City Council of the City Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California G/ordinanc/ordbkpg 3/19/98 ATTACHMENT 3 Ordinance No. LEGISLATIVE DRAFT THE ONLY CHANGE TO THIS SECTION IS ON PAGE 210-4 Chapttlr 210 Residential Districts Sections: 21002 Residential Districts Established 210.04 RL, RM, RMH, RH, and RMP Districts Land Use Controls 21006 RL,RM, RMH, RH, and RMP Districts Property Development Standards 210.08 Development Standards for Senior Projects 210.10 Modifications for Affordable Housing 21012 Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions 21014 RMP District Supplemental Development Standards 21016 Review of Plans 210.02 Residential Districts Established Five (5)residential zoning districts are established by this chapter as follows A The RL Low Density Residential District provides opportunities for single-family residential land use in neighborhoods, subject to appropriate standards Cluster development is allowed Maximum density is seven (7)units per acre B. The RM Medium-Density Residential District provides opportunities for housing of a more intense nature than single-family detached dwelling units, including duplexes, triplexes, town houses, apartments, multidwelling structures, or cluster housing with landscaped open space for residents'use Single-family homes, such as patio homes, may also be suitable Maximum density is fifteen(15)units per acre C The RMH Medium-High Density Residential District provides opportunities for a more intensive form of development than is permitted under the medium density designation while setting an upper limit on density that is lower than the most intense and concentrated development permitted in the City One subdistrict has been identified with unique characteristics where separate development standards shall apply RMH-A Small Lot Maximum density is twenty-five (25) units per acre D The RH High-Density Residential District provides opportunities for the most intensive form of residential development allowed in the City, including apartments in garden type complexes and high rise where scenic and view potential exists, subject to appropriate standards and locational requirements Maximum density is thirty-five (35)units per acre E The RMP Residential Manufactured Home Park District provides sites for mobile home or manufactured home parks, including parks with rental spaces and parks where spaces are individually owned Maximum density is nine(9) spaces per acre 210.04 RL,RM, RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Land Use Controls Chapter 210 210-1 10/3/94 1egisdrR/chp210/2/18/98 • • In the following schedules, letter designations are used as follows: "P" designates use classifications permitted in residential districts. "L" designates use classifications subject to certain limitations prescribed by the "Additional Provisions" that follow. "PC" designates use classifications permitted on approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. "ZA" designates use classifications permitted on approval of a conditional use permit by the Zoning Administrator. "TU" designates uses classifications allowed upon approval of a temporary use permit. "P/U" for an accessory use means that the use is permitted on the site of a permitted use, but requires a conditional use permit on the site of a conditional use. Use classifications that are not listed are prohibited. Letters in parentheses in the "Additional Provisions" column refer to provisions following the schedule or located elsewhere in the zoning ordinance. Where letters in parentheses are opposite a use classification heading, referenced provisions shall apply to all use classifications under the heading. (rest of page not used) I Chapter 210 210-2 10/3/94 1egisdrNchp210/2/18/98 RL,RM,RMH,RH, P- Permitted and RMP DISTRICTS: L- Limited(see Additional Use) LAND USE CONTROLS PC - Conditional use permit approved by Planning Commission ZA -Conditional use permit approved by Zoning Administrator TU -Temporary Use Permit P/U-Requires conditional use permit on site of conditional use Not Permitted RL RM RMH RMP Additional RH Provisions Residential Uses (A) (N) Day Care,Ltd. P P P P Group Residential - - PC - Multifamily Residential 2 -4 units - P P P (B)(C) 5-9 units ZA ZA ZA - 10 or more units PC PC PC - (B)((DD) Manufactured Home Parks ZA ZA - ZA (E)(F) Residential, Alcohol Recovery, Ltd. P P P P Residential Care,Limited P P P P Single-Family Residential P P P P (B)(D)(F)(M)(Q) Public and Semipublic (A)(P) Clubs&Lodges - - L-1 ZA Day Care,Large-family - ZA ZA ZA Day Care, General L-4- ZA ZA ZA Park&Recreation Facilities L-1 L-1 L-1 L-1 Public Safety Facilities PC PC PC PC Religious Assembly L-2 PC PC PC Residential Care, General - - PC PC Schools,Public or Private PC PC PC PC Utilities,Major PC PC PC PC Utilities, Minor P P P P Commercial Visitor Accommodations Bed and Breakfast Inns - - L3 - Accessory Uses P/U P/U P/U P/U (A)(G)R(I)(L) Temporary Uses (n Commercial Filming, Limited P P P P Real Estate Sales TU TU TU P (0) Personal Property Sales P P P P Street Fairs TU TU TU TU Nonconforming Uses (K)(L) Chapter 210 210-3 10/3/94 • i RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Provisions L-1 Public facilities permitted, but a conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator is required for private noncommercial facilities, including swim clubs and tennis clubs. L-2 A conditional use permit from the Planning Commission is required, and only schools operating in conjunction with religious services are permitted as an accessory use. A General Day-Care facility may be allowed as a secondary use, subject to a conditional use permit, if the Planning Commission finds that it would be compatible with adjacent areas and not cause significant traffic impacts. See Section 230.06: Religious Assembly Yard Requirements. L-3 A conditional use permit from the Planning Commission is required and only allowed on lots 10,000 sq. ft. or greater in RMH-A district. See also Section 230.42: Bed and Breakfast Inns. L-4 A conditional use permit from the Plannin Commission is required and only allowed on los 1.0 acre (gross acreage or greater fronting an arterial in RL District. (A) Any addition or modification subsequent to the original construction that would result in an increase in the amount of building area, or a significant exterior structural or architectural alteration, shall require an amendment to the conditional use permit previously obtained. (B) A conditional use permit from the Planning Commission is required for residential uses requesting reduction in standards for senior citizens (See Section 210.08), for affordable housing (See Sections 2 10.10 and 230.14), or for density bonus (See Section 230.14). (C) A conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator is required for any multiple family residential development that abuts an arterial highway, includes a dwelling unit more than 150 feet from a public street, or includes buildings exceeding 25 feet in height. (D) See Section 210.12: Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards. In addition, a conditional use permit is required for condominium conversion pursuant to Chapter 235. (E) See Section 210.14: RMP District Supplemental Standards. (F) See Section 230.16: Manufactured Homes. (G) See Section 230.12: Home Occupation in R Districts. (H) See Section 230.08: Accessory Structures. (1) See Section 230.10: Accessory Dwelling Units (n See Section 241.20: Temporary Use Permits. (K) See Chapter 236: Nonconforming Uses and Structures. (L) See Chapter 233: Signs (NI) All habitable rooms in a single-family dwelling must be accessible from within the dwelling. Chapter 210 2104 10/3/94 1egisdrR1chp210/2/18/98 • RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Provisions (continued) (I) Tents, trailers, vehicles, or temporary stuctures shall not be used for dwelling purposes. (0) See Section 230.18: Subdivision Sales Offices and Model Homes (P) Limited to facilities on sites of fewer than 2 acres. (Q) See Section 230.22: Residential Infill Lot Developments 210,06 RL,RM, RMH, RH, and RMP Districts: Property Development Standards The following schedule prescribes development standards for residential zoning districts and subdistricts designated on the zoning map. The columns establish basic requirements for permitted and conditional uses; letters in parentheses in the "Additional Provisions" column refer to "Additional Development Standards" following the schedule. In calculating the number of units permitted on the site, density is calculated on the basis of net site area. Fractional numbers shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number except that one dwelling unit may be allowed on a legally created lot complying with minimum lot area. All required setbacks shall be measured from ultimate right-of-way and in accordance with the definitions set forth in Chapter 203, Definitions. Any new parcel created pursuant to Title 25, Subdivisions, shall comply with the minimum building site requirements of the district in which the parcel is located unless approved as a part of a Planned Unit Development. (rest of page not used) Chapter 210 210-5 10/3/94 le&*Wchp2I0/2/18/98 • 0 Property Development Standards for Residential Districts RL RM RMH-A RMH RH RMP Additional Provisions Minimum Building Site Requirements Area(sq. ft.) 6,000 6,000 2,500 6,000 6,000 10 ac. (A)(B)(C) Width(ft.) 60 60 25 60 60 - Cul de sac frontage 45 45 - 45 45 - Minimum Setbacks (D)(E)(Q) Front(ft.) 15 15 12 10 10 (F)(K) Side(ft.) 3;5 3;5 3 3;5 3;5 - (G)(H)(V) Street Side (ft.) 6;10 6;10 5 6;10 6;10 - (H)(I)(n Rear(ft.) 10 10 7.5 10 10 - (H)(I)(T)(V) Garage (I)(U) Maximum Height(ft.) Dwellings 35 35 35 35 35 20 (L) Accessory Structures 15 15 15 15 15 15 (L)(T) Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) - 1.0 - - - Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling Unit (sq. ft.) 6,222 2,904 * 1,742 1,244 - (K) Maximum Lot Coverage(%) 50 50 50 50 50 75 Minimum Floor Area (1VI) Courts (1) Minimum Usable Open Space (0) Balconies and Bay Windows (P) Upper-Story Setbacks (Q) Landscaping See Chapter 232 Lighting (S) Fences and Walls See Section 230.88 Waterfront Lots (T) Off-Street Parking and Loading See Chapter 231 Underground Utilities See Chapter 17.64 Refuse Storage Areas See Section 230.78 Antenna See Section 230.80 Screening of Mechanical Equipment See Section 230.76 Signs See Chapter 233 Performance Standards See Section 230.82 Nonconforming Structures See Chapter 236 * Lots 50 feet or less in width= 1 unit per 25 feet of frontage Lots greater than 50 feet in width= lunit per 1,900 square feet Chapter 210 210-6 10/3/94 legisdrXchp210/2/18/98 • 0 RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (A) See Section 230.62: Building Site Required and Section 230.64: Development on Substandard Lots. (B) See Section 230.66: Development on Lots Divided by District Boundaries. (C) The minimum lot area shall be 12,000 square feet for General Day Care, General Residential Care, and Public or Private Schools. (D) See Section 230.68: Building Projections into Yards. (E) Building Separation. The minimum spacing between buildings including manufactured home units shall be 10 feet. (F) Variable Front Setback-Multifamily Projects. Projects with more than 4 units in the RM District, 8 units in the RMH Districts, and 14 units in the RH District shall have a minimum setback of 15 feet. Variable front setbacks are encouraged, and 50 percent of the garages shall be setback 20 feet from the front property line. (G) Interior Side Setback: In the RL, RM, RMH, and RH districts, ten percent of lot width but not less than 3 feet and need not exceed 5 feet. (1) Adjoining an RL District. The side yard shall be at least 10 feet for units in single-story or two-story buildings and 14 feet for units above two stories. The Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission, as the case may be, may approve upper- story setbacks in lieu of an increased yard if the second and third stories are setback the required distance. (H) Building Height and Required Yards. The width of a required interior side or rear yard adjoining a building wall exceeding 25 feet in height, excluding any portion of a roof, shall be increased three feet over the basic requirement. (1) Exceptions. If the lot width is less than 45 feet, no increase in the side yard is required. (I) Alley Setback. The width of a required interior side or rear yard adjoining an alley may be reduced to 3 feet for garages provided garages with alley access maintain the required turning radius. (n Street Side Yard. In the RL, RM, RMH, and RH districts, the street side yard shall be 20 percent of lot width, minimum 6 feet and need not exceed 10 feet. For 10 or more units, the street side setback shall be the same as the front setback. On lots 27 feet wide or less, the street setback may be reduced to 3 feet for a garage with alley vehicular access. Chapter 210 210-7 10/3/94 1egMWchp210/2/18/98 0 0 RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (continued) (K) See Section 210.14: RMP Supplemental Development Standards. (L) See Section 230.70: Measurement of Height, and Section 230.72: Exceptions to Height Limits. (1) Single Family Dwellings: (a) Second story plate height shall not exceed twenty-five(25) feet above top of subfloor/slab measured directly below. (b) Roofs shall have a minimum 5/12 pitch if building height exceeds thirty(30)feet. (c) Maximum building height for Main Dwellings shall be thirty-five(35)feet; however, Main Dwellings exceeding thirty(30) feet in height shall require approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator. (d) Habitable area, including rooftop decks and balconies, above the second story top plate line shall require approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Zoning Administrator with the following limitations: (1) The building height shall not exceed the maximum height limits. (2) Habitable area above the second story plate line shall be within the confines of the roof volume, with the following exceptions: (i) Dormers, decks and other architectural features may be permitted as vertical projections above the roof volume provided the projections are setback five(5)feet from the building exterior and do not exceed the height limits as stated above. (ii) Windows and deck areas above the second story plate line shall open onto public rights-of-way only. (3) Exterior stairways between the ground floor and a habitable area above the second story plate line shall be prohibited. (4) Access to habitable area above the second story top plate line shall be from within the Main Dwelling and shall be consistent with internal circulation. (e) To determine compliance with this subsection two vertical cross-sections through the property(front-to back and side-to-side)that show the relationship of each level in a new structure and new levels added to an existing structure to both existing and finished grade on the property and adjacent land within 5 feet of the property line shall be submitted. Chapter 210 210-8 10/3/94 legisd Wchp210/2/18/98 RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (eondawd) (2) Accessory, Structures: See Section 230.08: Accessory structures on projecting decks abutting a waterway shall comply with the height established in subsection (T). (3) Recreation Buildings: The maximum height of a recreation building for multifamily, planned residential, and mobilehome park projects shall be established by the conditional use permit. (M) Minimum Floor Area. Each dwelling unit in a multi-family building and attached single family dwellings shall have the following minimum floor area. Unit Type Minimum Area(Square Feet) Studio 500 one bedroom 650 two bedrooms 900 three bedrooms 1100 four bedrooms 1300 All detached single family dwellings shall have a minimum 1,000 square feet of floor area not including the garage and shall be a minimum of 17 feet in width. (1) Courts Opposite Windows in the RM. RMH, and RH Districts. Courts shall be provided in all multifamily projects in the RM, RMH, and RH Districts (excluding the RMH-A subdistrict). (1) Courts Opposite Walls on the Same Site: The minimum depth shall be one-half the height of the opposite wall but not less than 20 feet opposite a living room and 14 feet opposite a required window for any other habitable room. (2) Courts Opposite Interior Property Line: The minimum depth of a court for a required window of a habitable room shall be 10 feet measured from the property line. (3) Court Dimensions: Court shall be 20 feet wide -- 10 feet on either side of the centerline of the required window and shall be open to the sky, provided that eaves may project 2 feet into a court. Chapter 210 210-9 10/3/94 legis&Wchp210/2/18/98 RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (eonanned) Section A I Section B I Section C jLiving room ' window ' j AL t I I 1/2 Height of 20 ft. 14 ft. opposit wall Not►ess than 10 ft.I I t -LMI.-JL.- Living room window I Living room I window h Living room Living room Living room window window window h/2 --► 20 ft. Section A Section B Other room f=Otheroom window 14 ft. Section C 2l0-CU.CDR COURTS OPPOSITE WINDOWS Chapter 210 210-10 10/3/94 legisdrWchp210/2/18/98 0 RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (eontlnued) (0) Open Space Requirement. The minimum usable open space(private and common) for multi- family residential projects in RM, RMH, and RH Districts shall be 25 percent of the residential floor area per unit. The minimum usable open space in the RNIP district shall be 200 square feet per space, and shall be common. A portion or all of the usable open space shall be private; otherwise it shall be common. (1) Private Open Space. Private open space shall be in courts or balconies within which a horizontal rectangle has no dimension less than 10 feet for courts and 6 feet for balconies. A minimum patio area of 70 square feet shall be provided within the court. The following minimum area shall be provided: Minimum Area (Sq.Ft.) Units Above Unit Type Ground Floor Units Ground Floor Studio/1 bedroom 200 60 2 bedrooms 250 120 3 bedrooms 300 120 4 or more bedrooms 400 120 Private open space shall be contiguous to the unit and for the exclusive use of the occupants. Private open space shall not be accessible to any dwelling unit except the unit it serves and shall be physically separated from common areas by a wall or hedge at least 42 inches in height. (2) Common Open Space. Common open space, provided by interior side yards, patios and terraces, shall be designed so that a horizontal rectangle has no dimension less than 10 feet, shall be open to the sky, and shall not include driveways or parking areas, or area required for front or street side yards. Projects with more than 20 units shall include at least one amenity, such as a clubhouse, swimming pool, tennis court, volleyball court, outdoor cooking facility, or other recreation facility. (3) A portion of the private open space requirement, not to exceed 50 percent, may be on open decks above the second story upon approval of a conditional use permit by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, provided that no portion of such a deck shall exceed the height limit. (4) The Director or Zoning Administrator also may allow the open space requirement to be reduced to 10 percent of the livable area per unit for projects with less than 10 units that are within walking distance of 1,000 feet of a public park or the beach. Chapter 210 210-11 10/3/94 le&drIVchp210/2/18/98 RI.,,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (caapoea) (P) Balconies and Bay Windows. Balconies and bay windows may project into required yards and usable open space, subject to Section 230.68 and the following limitations: (1) Balconies shall have open railings, glass or architectural details with openings to reduce visible bulk. Balconies composed solely of solid enclosures are not allowed to project into required yards. (Q) Upper-story Setbacks. In the RM,RMH, and RH districts, the covered portion of all stories above the second shall be setback an average of an additional 10 feet from the second floor facade. til average 10'setback D QQ 000 D DO 3 00 0 D 0 210-UPSS.PCX UPPER STORY SETBACK (R) Required Landscaping Ad-joiningStreets.treets. At least 40 percent of all visible portions of a required front or street side yard adjoining a street shall be a planting area. All subdivisions shall provide a minimum five foot (5)wide landscaped area along arterial street/highway property lines. The actual required width shall be determined during the planning process. Maintenance of said landscaped area shall be by a homeowners association, property owner or other method approved by the City of Huntington Beach. (S) Lighting. A lighting system shall be provided in all multifamily projects along all vehicular access ways and major walkways. Lighting shall be directed onto the driveways and walkways within the development and away from adjacent properties. A lighting plan shall be submitted for approval by the Director. Chapter 210 210-12 10/3/94 1e&ddVchp210/2/18/98 s • RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (eonanuei) (T) Waterfront Lots. Projecting decks, windscreens, fencing, patio covers and solariums on waterfront lots may be permitted subject to the development standards set forth in this Chapter, Chapter 245, and Chapter 17.24 and the following requirements: (1) Decks. Decks on waterfront lots may project 5 feet beyond the bulkhead or bulkhead line extended, provided that side yard setback required for the main dwelling are maintained. (2) Windscreens. Windscreens may be permitted if constructed of light-weight materials such as plastic, canvas, fiberglass, tempered glass or metal, except for necessary bracing and framing. The maximum height for windscreens shall be 7 feet above the finished surface of the deck at the bulkhead line. (3) Fencing:. All portions of fencing within the required rear yard setback area shall comply with Chapter 230.88 and the visibility provisions below. (4) Solariums. Solariums (patio enclosures) may project a maximum of 30 inches over the bulkhead. In all cases, the solarium shall maintain a 45 degree visibility angle as measured from the main dwelling building line extended to the side property line. The maximum height shall not exceed the top of the first floor ceiling joist. (5) Patio Covers. Patio covers may be permitted to project 5 feet into the rear yard setback, however, construction materials shall allow compliance with visibility provisions below. (6) Visibility. The portion of any windscreen, fence or patio cover in the rear yard setback or solarium above 36 inches in height shall be composed of materials and design which allow a minimum of 85 percent transmission of light and visibility through the structure in each direction when viewed from any angle. (continued on next page) Chapter 210 210-13 10/3/94 1e&drl3/chp210/2/18/98 0 0 RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (confined) (7) Removal. Decks, solariums and windscreens projecting over waterways which do not comply with the above provisions may be removed by the city upon 30-days' written notice. Such projections are declared to be a privilege which can be revoked for noncompliance and not a vested right. Bulkhead Solarium Projecting deck 2 1/2' Max. �`•��� ~_ '^\_i n\_i'\ _ice\_i�\_/ _� ~-�_/�\_�%- �_/^\_���_/ -T5' 450 45 0 5' 5' • min. house min. . Property line 1 210-14b.CDR WATERFRONT LOT PROJECTIONS (U) Garage. 20 feet front entry; 10 feet side entry; 5 feet rear entry; 25 foot turning radius required from garage to the opposite side of accessway. (V) Zero Side or Rear Yard. (1) A zero interior side yard setback may be permitted provided that the opposite side yard setback shall be twenty(20%)percent of lot width, minimum of five(5)feet, need not exceed ten(10) feet, or a zero rear yard setback may be permitted provided that the opposite rear yard setback for the adjacent lot shall be either zero or a minimum of ten(10)feet, and subject to the following requirements: (a) The lot adjacent to the zero setback side yard or rear yard shall either be held under the same ownership at the time of application or a deed restriction or agreement approved as to form by the City Attorney shall be recorded giving written consent of the adjacent property owner. Chapter 210 210-14 10/3/94 1eg6dr i/dip210/2/18/98 a 0 (b) A maintenance easement, approved as to form by the City Attorney, shall be recorded between the property owner and the owner of the adjacent lot to which access is reqired in order to maintain and repair a zero lot line structure. Such easement shall be an irrevocable covenant running with the land. No building permits shall be issued until such recorded maintenance easement has been submitted. (c) Side yard separation between the structure and any structure on an adjacent lot shall either be zero or a minimum of five (5) feet. (d) No portion of the dwelling or any architectural features shall project over the property line. (e) The zero setback shall not be adjacent to a public or private right-of-way. (f) Exposure protection between structures shall be provided as specified by the Fire Department and Building Division. (2) Double zero side yards may be permitted for planned unit development projects subject to approval of a conditional use permit and compliance with Section 210.12B. 210.08 Development Standards for Senior Projects This section establishes development standards for the Senior Projects that may be permitted by the Planning Commission for the construction of a senior residential project. A. Minimum Floor Area per Dwelling Unit. 450 square feet. B. Minimum Setbacks. The project shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the district applicable to the site. C. Minimum Distance between Buildings. 10 feet. D. BuildingDesign. No structure shall exceed 180 feet in length. To provide variation in building facades, two of the following architectural elements are required as part of each building: sloped roofs; bay windows; awnings; roof eaves; cornices;balconies; or patios. E. Open Space 1. Private Open Space: A minimum of 60 square feet for studios or one bedroom units and 120 square feet for two or more bedrooms, with a 6-foot minimum dimension. 2. Common Open Space: 2,500 square feet plus 50 square feet for each unit over 50. 3. Community Club House: An enclosed community or clubhouse facility containing 7 square feet per unit, with a minimum of 400 square feet, may provide up to 50 percent of the common open space requirement. The clubhouse shall include handicapped bathrooms and kitchen facilities to be used by project residents and their guests only. Chapter 210 210-15 10/3/94 legiadrlt*210/2/18/98 RL,RM,RMH,RH, and RMP Districts: Additional Development Standards (contlaued) F. Elevators. Buildings with more than 2 levels, including living areas or parking, shall have elevators. G. Parkin¢. Parking shall comply with Chapter 231. Any parking space over and above the one space per unit shall be marked for guest use. 210.10 Modifications for Affordable Housing The Planning Commission or the Zoning Administrator may approve a conditional use permit modifying the minimum property development standards in this chapter for affordable housing, as provided in Section 230.14. The proposed modifications shall be requested in writing by the applicant, accompanied by a detailed pro-forma, rental guidelines, deed restrictions, financial subsidies, and other types of documentation which will serve to demonstrate the need for a reduction of development standards. Modifications to the standards may include, but are not limited to, the parking requirements and open space. The specific standard(s) from which the applicant is requesting relief shall be identified and alternative development standard(s) proposed. 210.12 Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions This section establishes supplement development standards and provisions that shall apply to all planned unit developments. A. Mans. A tentative and final or parcel map shall be approved pursuant to Title 25, Subdivisions. B. Project Design. 1. Driveway parking for a minimum of fifty percent of the units shall be provided when units are attached side by side. 2. A maximum of six units may be attached side by side and an offset on the front of the building a minimum of four(4) feet for every two units shall be provided. 3. A minimum of one-third of the roof area within a multi-story, multi-unit building shall be one story less in height than the remaining portion of the structure's roof area. C. Common Areas. Every owner of a lot or dwelling unit shall own as an appurtenance to such unit or lot either an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities or a share in the corporation, community association, or limited partnership owning the common areas and facilities. D. Covenants. The developer shall submit a covenant setting forth a plan or manner of permanent care and maintenance of all common areas and communal facilities. Such covenant shall be included in the Covenant, Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&R's) applying to the property and shall be approved by the City Attorney and Director. The CC&R's shall be approved prior to final or parcel map approval and when approved, shall be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Chapter 210 210-16 10/3/94 leg6drWchp210/2/18/98 E. Maintenance. The corporation, community association, or limited partnership shall have the responsibility of maintaining the common areas and facilities as shown on the final development plans, the buldings and use of property for planned unit development. F. Sale of Lots. No dwelling unit or lot shall be sold or encumbered separately from an interest in the common areas and facilities in the development which shall be appurtenant to such dwelling unit or lot. No lot shall be sold or transferred in ownership from the other lots in the total development or approved phase of the development unless all approved community buildings, structures and recreational facilities for the total development, or approved phase thereof, have been completed, or completion is assured, by bonding or other method satisfactory to the City. G. Management Agreement. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, community association, or limited partnership has been formed with the right to assess all those properties which are jointly owned with interests in the common areas and facilities in the development to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features o the developemnt. Said entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units, and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs and srvices. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to and receive approval of the City prior to making any such sale..This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 210.14 RMP District Supplemental Development Standards This section establishes supplemental standards for the development manufactured home parks. A. Individual space setbacks for manufactured homes and accessory structures shall be landscaped and are as follows: Front 5 feet Sides 10 feet aggregate, minimum 3 feet on any side Rear 5 feet B. Each space shall be provided 150 cubic feet of enclosed, usable storage space. C. The undercarriage of all manufactured homes shall be screened from view on all sides. D. A six foot high concrete or masonry wall shall be provided along all interior property lines of the manufactured home park. In addition, a twenty(20) foot wide landscaped berm or a ten foot wide landscaped area and a six foot high wall shall be located at the minimum front setback line. E. A boat of trailer storage area shall be provided and screened from view by a six foot high fence or wall. F. Each individual mobilehome space shall be permitted a maximum of 75% site coverage. 210.16 Review of Plans All applications for new construction and exterior alterations and additions shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review. Discretionary review shall be required as follows: Chapter 210 210-17 10/3/94 1eesdrWchp210/2/18/98 A. Zoning Administrator Review. Projects on substandard lots; projects with 1-4 units adjacent to arterial highway; projects with 5 - 9 units; projects requiring a conditional use permit from the Zoning Administrator; see Chapter 241. B. Design Review Board. Projects within redevelopment project areas, areas subject to specific plans and projects within 500 feet of a PS District; see Chapter 244. C. Planning Commission. Projects requiring a conditional use permit from the Planning Commission; projects with 10 or more units; see Chapter 241. D. Projects in the Coastal Zone. A Coastal Development Permit is required unless the project is exempt; see Chapter 245. I Chapter 210 210-18 10/3/94 le&&Wchp210/2/18/98 ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-3 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO, 97-3 1. Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 to change the zoning on a 1.03 acre parcel from CG-FP2 (General Commercial-Flood Plain Overlay District 2)to RL-FP2 (Low Density Residential-Flood Plain Overlay District 2) is consistent with Land Use Element goal (LU7) and associated objective (LUT 1) and policy (LU7.1.1)as well as objective (LU9.4)because it would augment development of an institutional use and services that support the needs of Huntington Beach residents while maintaining the City's scale and character, within residential neighborhoods. It also is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of RL (Residential Low Density) on the subject site. 2. The zoning map amendment is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the standards prescribed for, the zoning district for which it is proposed. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed. The new zoning will permit new facilities to be developed and provide services which have been offered to residents in the vicinity. It will also ensure development that is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. The site is presently designated as RL (Residential Low Density) on the General Plan and the proposed rezoning action will be consistent with the current General Plan designation and would encourage development of the site in accord with recently adopted ZSO development standards. Attachment- 1/27/98 (98srO8-22) ATTACHMENT 5 !l�'iiCf.•�'�t�J:� �,,,�/.Zj a"`ire ZiVl-,r ol)U T7i90)✓ ORDINANCE NO.3 3 8 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY AMENDING DISTRICT MAP 7 (SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 7-6-10) TO REZONE THE REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF INDIANAPOLIS AVENUE AND BUSHARD STREET FROM CG-FP2(GENERAL COM MRCIAL-FLOOD PLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT 2)TO RL(LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-FLOOD PLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT 2) (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-3) WHEREAS, pursuant to the California State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Map Amendment No 97-3, which rezones the property generally located on the northwest corner of Indianapolis Avenue and Bushard Street from CG- FP2 (General Commercial-Flood Plain Overlay District 2)to RL(Low Density Residential-Flood Plain Overlay District 2); and After due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. That the real property that is the subject of this Ordinance(hereinafter referred to as the"Subject Property")is generally located on the northwest corner of Indianapolis Avenue and Bushard Street in the City of Huntington Beach, and is more particularly described as lot 79, Tract No. 6322, MM 253-41, 42, 43 and identified in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. That the zoning designation of the Subject Property is hereby changed from CG(General Commercial)to RL(Low Density Residential). SECTION 3. That Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Section 201.04B District Map 7 (Sectional District Map 7-6-10) is hereby amended to reflect Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 as described herein. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended map. A copy of said District Map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. g:niao 1--.aa 1 SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of March 51998 ATTEST: .J ayor City Clerk 4*7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: REVIEWED AND APPROVED: G a!L tic 7CD� Ci y Attorney �� Y City Adininistrator INITIATED AND APPROVED: Community Developmen g.n/p/ordi=ncVezme.doc 2 ANNING ZONING DM 7 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 7-6-10 �.� -•� NOTE: cT ALL SIMMONS Aat N r[ CITY OF .DD.T[D .,a,aT ,� aa �»M � aNMT ff NT N NT•Noao To aiTallo To of a THE ClMT[a of ueN a"MT N.AT t1TT COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. T„ LEGEND: A.POca aoNl CAic ORO NO aalp.co sow OMo.ao. al NMlLc MML7 ap1owc own'" Ff-Q a!! 916 !-a•fi fi-• NMf HUNTINGTON BEACH ' ~ �' '�" fi" QN spir" .fRNKTYaAL NaraM T f Ay. Mf IOaa I-Q-7• 71-" aa.t NONMNNNNmO CNIIIaaCYL owmaltT -!•7-M- •ais. s IIOf 4.17.90 Oo1R11AfTf N-e0 OQTNCT a•1-•f !oa .fa. 1•I7•y/loon 701N f•0• IM•N.A7 commeNCIAL N•TNCT Q-f•af a" IIN ONI•MNO ~"M oa.MODUCTI0M c-.•M ff-Q. Qo7 ®.-COMMUNITY fAGUTNauo.CATgMAUo1aTNCT CALIFORNIA ,N: M_: .^fACLITN!DQCa[ATIDNaLI•NTa1cT ORANGE COUNTY a-.•f7 •7-11 Qaa „ IN71 0 Zow-FPa FLOODPLAMFINCT f•.-f7 f7-aa Q.f O. fa-u 1717 afaw7n Mn.Tt siara7a MNhM .-0! 1.93 KT•1G1 LNN 1-a>ff M-.! N•• EM O.ICK PrArcu.NIL o1aT111Li .-f-70 H-.11 1847 .-••70 1`0-3 Is" Q-7-70 70-17 I617 f a 1 • t•1-71 70-aa .a. e 7 UM-to 7 • ADAMS AVE. Rl RI �Y— J lM•I it RI a RI RI RI RI RI Ftl C4 H �+ RI y 1.•:a7r .r.+L N u ea $RI RI d RI f RA « Fi RI ' 1 b R, I F:I . RI RI ma RI Rl RI MEDITERRANEANDIL LQoft RI RI R1 RIC3 .RI CA RI J .- CANDLEWOGD � F ; RI ' YAY.OTN on. 1 Rl o R I 3 Rl ' RI all,RI RI RI RI RI RI oM fi 7L 1 ,eT*oR Rl R I R, RI CF-E a J R t R I R I R 1 ` =�� =00. �NAW3 RI oa IRI RI RI . ac .t71 R. s CF-R —. •. i fRf.N- a N ,a00N 3 nit. R'—silts �It�I RI Po RI --•- •-------.... I RI RI 5 !r RI NL fw an M. RI Q Q r7 Y.AooM oL RI RI Is..!N4x5 sa+DCLt RI 3 v a a tMely.-y R I RI RI o RI RI RI R I Il a RI RI RI RI RI RI RI RI A -- AVE a`0 5 RI RI R! RI X RI .RI Mu ! Y Li - RI RI RI RI C RI RI N RR, RI 3 NIM.INI .Na RI RI 1€ RI CF-E RI RI RI RI RI RTM a. CaNL9A ('SA=aff17R_Ra SCH"OIJ Is a RI RI i RI Rt RI RI Ni i AL CA Y RI RI RI RI Rlo y RI RI RI RI a Rl >t R a uN M. CF-R RI RI - RI L RI a Y000aclr a aYmoNa. ." RI o J J Z R I RI RI RI i RI : RI is. Ca. R, CF—E L M RI a m !R Rl IR08_iT It IRIRKE R I RI 3CL-mmI RI i RI cosisTocit RI Rl 7 ■ RI RI RI d RI � ► RI a r a.a7s _ RI 7$ f oM. it Po RI RI RI RI RI 8 " C4 S RI RI s RI o NO RI f"cscc N XITc a& OF - RI p RI Rl RI i d ATLANTA AVE. Q 7 n • 7 • Q M-Q20 . e J! Ord. No. 3389 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, CONNIE BROCKWAY,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd of March, 1998, and was again read to said City Council at a re ular meeting thereof held on the 16th of March, 1998, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Julien, Harman, Green, Dettloff, Bauer, Sullivan, Garofalo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I,Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Independent on ,19 In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officio Jerk Connie Brockway City Clerk of the City Council of the City Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California 1 G/ordinanc/ordbkpg 3/19/98 ATTACHMENT 6 ] - i • s • r • a r � ADAMS � Ate' RI RI I e y 3 �� H RI 8 RI RI RI RI RI RI RI ar M i $RI I RA RI RI « Pi RI ib RI 1 F.1 RI RINEOFTWURAMEM RI t - Rl RI CAW RI B 3 RI RI R! I RI RI C�NOt lWGL� - o/ 11 RI w ,Wm o•. p RI RI !RI RI RI o R1 r —on RI RI RI RI j G V RI 'R^0• RI RI RI R.;a J RI RI RI RI sw r RonC��E RI oR. Ll :RI RI RI a < W q, R. CF_R < m n...0 �r� N 3 not RI RI RI RI PROJECT t •a RI a a •..iw.00. RI RI as-R Tj,locu RI Ad OR R 1. RI RI a RI RI RI RI I' Ri lI RI RI rRl RI RI RI RI i Rt 1 AVE RI 3 RI RI i eurx•W 'a RI St RI RI RI RI RI RI _ RI RI RI RI RI RI RI RI rll CF—E a, RI RI " RI RI J RI 0SA•a So wmo SCWAI l RI ■ ■ RI RI RI a u � � Rl RI I RI RI RI RIo r Po RI RI an RI a CF-RSP I RI RI RI • RI OL + RI o Z I RI RI ■ RI r RI RI Y CF-E r vw CA Rl RI IRC6•JTKat Q ' un:«r" J RI RI RI i / RI RI RI RI RI03 RI RI - Of Rl RI & RI RI 8 • " L Po RI RI RI CA RI . 5 RI ' RI `T RI .IT. oP RI RI RI RI RI ATLANTA AVE u r � IS Is �J ZONING MAP HuNnNam BLUN HUbrMGMN BEACH n ANMNG DIVISION .. i• i ii • -i ..- .. /I rir r • it to Min• . ... .. ... .� �- r► c..rrr. `.: Val- r• r. a� CC -- C- Mn, m�iC elr'/111 r1/ *jw ♦I*rr rr r „fir /i1�, I/ ww ww rw ww w �rr i= - �C' CC-CC i�,�Ir1/Ir ���fwJwM.1: • �� ws ww ww ww . w w a .... ww ww ww.�IMI!����,••- —_ = w ... m.w ...■rC��� ►iir .�w.l al. w•m rs ww. wIn s .� ''``■��w -w wr �- wn vw �. wI•►� Iw. w. II i III armor ww ww w- f11\r%111� i ■�����•��w �11111■1/ �i Cw I ■ ��/IHII##111 ##111r1 /1/I� ►`II�rIq�1r ownjj /�IIf1#f11 #111111 �11rIr111/llffifl M • •• 11111/1111r- 111611 �•Iriirirr �.- �-C �,;; 111111111111mif1 • /111 ;I/IIIIIr11 C ' C 'I11111111goC r1/� - - ��Illlrtn 3� ��-w - I I I - " w 111111 Ir : • ♦�- , . �. =iw =w -r -C a� on ow w flllll w% � -w w��a\,/\*/w w It ww IIII11/r►_w w• ww w /Illf . . �- wr ww wr ww - �111f1 Cl/Ir1111/ - - -- 1111fI111�C CC -�' -_ --�ww '•- ww w - ww w- ww ww ww • I11111 IIIIIIr . i `ice IIr1l�rrifiq.w�,mx�C3 � NI ff11r ww ww rw ww C�t-� aw w rmw.r, ZO -- ww ww • a-- - - w w.ww ww ww,.ww w /1111 w/III/1f11 wwwww .w C@1 wN>t1�1.111 w ww ww ww wr /11111 C��r1111rr�w , w- rrre1111111�.�.. -. �, - Ii ; ■111111111/1111 1/111/ -//r111111,: - �!� ""' f1r111111r11f/r -' w � fill w- Mm`�#IIr111Ir/ ww Y_: '. '/ ,,,- 11111/�1+11111111� LLJ f1111111111 "1111111111 Milllfll■M1a�rr�11�i111 • /111111#11 �III�IIrnl�, ��, If::1111f11rt 111 11= ��IIr1111 _ • IIIIIIIIM " 1�111 - 1111� w,. , r1111r11 w • I111A11r 1111. 11lIrH w111111 w���� 1 11111 111111ot �il If111 1 w _ :1111■ on IIIAi111 w IIIr1111 fill w w11111� - ww '�w CC �•- ■■■I/Ir1111r1111n1/ w i1111111 w "C" F� m• I A ws ww ww Cw �� C w �--+.J • C Cwt ���= C//ir/wrr. CIIIII�'r1 ,�M _ r �ww ww-111111�, -_ww �-1w,r,,��=w,`1/Cw,�lj w-'w�'■w�-■�wC _ �M��f1If,I111'111Igill ,111.111 1M+.►�'f!w:� 11/1f�1f1w C-w- - w C- ww�1w �w1111 CC' � Cwlilr L IF .lw ,/ 1Mjmmw •ww ww1 C wi11111■�i -�rCa• CwCwnl ww w-- mwmC . ww 1111 i wr - pm■1111/ r •- IIIIIIIiIrr -C/�r1 •. �--* �I/11f11111111\,i M/I//1111_I11�/111111►1 f�IIIII11111/1111 %111 ■ IIIIIIIIINI#f � lfrlrf� w■rn■■r -r11p !nr1f. �IIII�jC 24,Wv 1IIf1111111 11111111/%� t'i111r6 11o1 ' i i:11■■ LU IIfI111r •• w tee . _ �*:rr a lid w►�sr 111W40M C // ■■■■ C1/P.'.' �1G�r I/II/NCB w• '�I�,-m MI■I1/■If C -M �' • ��� I;IIr1 LU •/w - r�\■i■ �iw/ �r� 1111/�.-w./ff.C11/ - fllrlrryw ww - ■� 'm'■ ♦ 11/1r .�tr .._v -w *mw w+�i r . al ww C rai w- A - - I/■■ , � � .001■� /1rlf.t N 2/11111/ Con Ir1111I �- -- w w- ww a��/Ir1 IIIIIIw a w �ww ww / a �Nw ' .��■ w1 w��r/� - wr. ar,�r�i ww ww ar iww CWC lilt\�- CC r ♦1♦= w Ci �► !w ww ww a Mc iww MM - rip w ww' w• ■ -��`/, . w ww w4i..��- ww w w/ ww low wr • w- 1111I�w ww�-• ■■■/' -��111.�- - ww',wr ww ;: ■w.: .... .... irwi a/ L ww - . • w ;ww, ww ww ww�w�. • rw - Iww•!MWM ,wad 'M—�wmr ww w. 1111\�C,'rw; . w war u w wf/■■■■ ■�Cl/III- M • - wur ww ww ww arw w w, arw wmr w- ■j� Ilr■Irlr' \/_ ■■■�I/■ w\�111w,w (� ' njrrYwrrYw-Yww�w.�; •r ■ w 1 /� 1■■■111 Irrli�r•///� ��ii1■1:� �i"ii i�11■11■■■■■11■1■■111�� � rrI111r11/11f 1 11►� 1 s■1sr�1�f►����I■Ir11lM11 mf1r1�w•�a►rwr�=► V d 111�#f11 =w .�Cpa.CA.�.i -1■ '�. ■�'.i M Mink S MC am Win MM fH1 M ZZ'' Jlpf:�i : MOM : 11/,::"XIe/i1uii _ =��11i iil1: ��■ Iri#I1lr/1■ w IMM! ATTACHMENT 7 Huntington Beach Ord o Code � 4.2(b)--9634.3(f) (b) The total enrollment for the family day care home shall conform to state law. (c) The applicant shall submit clearance from the fire department and a copy of the Orange County social services license, prior to the operation of the family day care home. . (d) Such facility shall not be located closer than six hundred (600) feet to another large family day care home. (e) Garages shall not be used as a designated play area or used in calculating minimum square footage in a family day care home. (f) loading and unloading of children from vehicles shall only.be permitted on the driveway, approved parking area or directly in front of the facility. (g) The family day care home shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 8.40, noise control of the municipal code. (h) The Planning Commission reserves the right to. revoke the approval of a family day care home if a violation of the conditions of approval occurs. All revocation proceedings shall be preceded by a public hearing. (i) Approvals for family day care homes are nontransferable and the dwelling unit shall be owner occupied. (j) A minimum of .two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided in addition to the two (2) required fully enclosed, parking spaces. (1077-8/64, 1670-10/71 , 1836-6/73, 1915-6/74, 1940-10/74, 2113-10/76, 2313-9/78, 2556-7/82, 2889-12/86, 2957-9/88) 9634.3 Day Care Centers Day care centers including infant centers, preschools, and extended day care facilities shall be subject to the following provisions: (a) Seventy-five (75) square feet of outdoor play area per child. Thirty-five (35) square feet of indoor play area per child. Outdoor play areas shall be grassed and enclosed by a minimum six foot high fence. Fencing may be required to be masonry as determined by the Planning Commission. Any gate entry shall be securely fastened. (2957-9/88) (b) Minimum ten (10%) percent of the parking area shall be landscaped. (c) The total enrollment for the day care center shall be established by the Planning Commission. (d) Fire department clearance shall be obtained prior to the operation of the day care center. (e) Hours of operation shall be established by the Planning Commission. (f) The applicant shall submit a copy of the Orange County social services license prior to the operation of the day care center. 2/94 9634.3(g)--9' ington Beach Ordinance 'Code 10 (g) The applicant shall obtain a business license prior to the operation of the day care center. (h) Off-street parking for day care centers .shall be one parking space per staff member plus one per classroom. (2957-9/88) (i) Loading and unloading of children shall only be permitted from approved parking areas. (j) Children attending the day care centers shall be restricted to designated play areas only, unless supervised by an adult. (k) The day care center shall comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 8.40,. noise control of the municipal code. (1) The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke the approval of a da_ care center if a violation of the conditions of approval occurs. All revocation proceedings shall be preceded by a public hearing. (1077-8/64, 1670-10/71 , 1836-6/73, 1915-6/74, 1940-10/74, 2113-11/76, 2313-9/78, 2556-7/82, 2632-8/83, 2889-12/86,) 9635 Bed and Breakfast Inns. Bed and breakfast inns are subject to the following provisions: (2957-9/88) (a) The use shall be located in a building of residential design having a minimum of 2,000 square feet of. residential floor area which has no less than 3 and no more than 6 lodging rooms and one common room available for social interaction .and serving of breakfast meal. (2957-9/88) (b) An owner, manager, proprietor or caretaker shall reside on the subject site at all times. (2957-9/88) (c) No cooking facilities shall be permitted in any guest rooms. (2957-9/88) (d) No meals shall be served to guests other than breakfast. Said breakfast, if served, shall be served only to registered overnight guests. (2957-9/88) (e) No guest shall be permitted to rent accommodations or remain in occupancy for a period in excess of fourteen (14) days during any consecutive ninety (90) day period. (2957-9/88) (f) The use may be permitted in any single-family residence in any zone deemet by the City to be of architectural or historical significance and in compliance with the Uniform Building Codes as adopted by the City. (2957-9/88) (g) Parking shall be one enclosed space for owner/manager; one space for each guest room used for, sleeping purposes; and one space for visitor parking. (2957-9/88) (h) Signage shall be limited to either one wall sign not more than two (2) square feet in area, or one freestanding sign not more than two (2) square 2/94 I ATTACHMENT 8 Huntington Beach Department of Community Development STA" REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Howard Zelefsky,Planning Director BY: Amy Wolfe,Assistant Planner DATE: January 27, 1998 SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 97-3/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-18 (GENERAL DAY CARE CENTERS) LOCATION: City-wide STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 represents a request by Marko E.Botich to allow General Day Care uses within the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district. Staff has evaluated the amendment with regard to general planning/land use compatibility issues and determined that the subject request will implement General Plan land use goals and will be compatible with adjacent developments if implemented in conjunction with building site development standards which would limit development of such uses on lots 1.0 acre or greater fronting an arterial and subject to review and approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. Staff recommends approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 for the following reasons: • The proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. • The proposed zoning text amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan which encourage the development of institutional uses and service uses that support the City's resident needs within residential neighborhoods. • The proposed zoning text amendment would not permit development which would be detrimental to property or uses within the City in general. The scale of development shall be compatible with residential development adjacent to project sites. The projects shall convey a high quality visual image and character. Site specific development proposals shall be subject to location and site size criteria and shall require review and approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission to ensure the use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: A. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-18 for the zoning text amendment only(Attachment No. 5);" and B. "Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 (Attachment No. 2)with findings (Attachment No. 1) and forward to the City Council for adoption." ALTERNATIVE ACTIONW: The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Deny Negative Declaration No. 97-18 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3, with findings for denial. B. "Continue Negative Declaration No. 97-18 and Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 and direct staff accordingly." GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Marko E. Botich, 6 Upper Newport Plaza,Newport Beach, CA 92660 PROPERTY OWNER: Not applicable REQUEST: A zoning text amendment to permit"General Day Care"uses within the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district. DATE ACCEPTED: September 9, 1997 PROJECT PROPOSAL: Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 represents a request by the applicant to permit General Day Care uses within the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district,pursuant to Section 210.04 RL,RM, RMH, RH, and RMP Districts: Land Use Controls, of the ZSO. The General Day Care use classification is defined in Section 204.08 of the ZSO as follows: "Provision of non-medical care for 13 or more persons on a less than 24 hour basis. This classification includes nursery schools,preschools, and day-care centers for children and adults." ISSUES: General Plan Conformance: The proposed zoning text amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's General Plan and the Land Use Element designation of RL (Residential Low Density)for the project site. Staff Report- 1/27/98 2 (98SR07) The following General Plan policies support the subject request: LU 7 Achieve a diversity of land uses that sustain the City s economic viability, while maintaining the City's economic resources scale and character. The proposed zoning text amendment will provide for the inclusion of institutional service uses that support resident needs within residential neighborhoods subject to location and site size criteria and review/approval by the Planning Commission. L U 7.1 Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that a)provides for housing, commercial employment, educational, cultural, entertainment, and recreational needs of existing and future residents, b)provides employment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding subregion, c) captures visitor and tourist activity, and d)provides open space and aesthetic "relief'from urban development. The proposed zoning text amendment will reinstate development of General Day Care uses within low density residential areas, a land use planning provision which would allow the City to compete with other cities in the region which permit general day care uses within similar zoning districts, and provide services and employment opportunities to benefit Huntington Beach residents. LU7.1.1 Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Land Use and Density Schedules (Table LU-2a and 2b) The proposed text amendment will permit General Day Care uses within the RL(Low Density Residential)zoning district, in compliance with residential General Plan Land Use provisions for the inclusion of institutional uses within residential areas. LU9.4 Provide for the inclusion of recreational, institutional, religious, educational and service uses that support the resident needs within residential neighborhoods. The proposed text amendment will permit consideration of General Day Care, a Public- Semipublic/institutional use,within residential neighborhoods. LU9.4.1 Accommodate the development ofparks, sports facilities, schools, libraries community meeting facilities, religious facilities, and similar community serving uses in all residential areas,provided that they are compatible with adjacent residential uses and subject to review and approval by the City and other appropriate agencies. The proposed text amendment will permit a community serving use within the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district on lots 1.0 acre or greater fronting an arterial, subject to review and approval of the use by the Planning Commission. Staff Report- 1/27/98 3 (98SR07) Environmental Status: Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed zoning text amendment. Subsequently,Negative Declaration No. 97-18 (Attachment No. 5 )was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the . HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act(CEQA). Negative Declaration No. 97-18 analyzed the subject zoning text amendment request in conjunction with Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Variance No. 97-24. The latter three requests are associated with a site specific proposal for the development of an adult day care facility on an RL zoned parcel located at 20471 Bushard Street, which will also be subject to Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3. The Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 97-18 for twenty (20) days commencing on November 27, 1997 and ending on December 17, 1997. Comments were received from the City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board concerning transportation/circulation, biological resources and cultural resources issues addressed in Environmental Assessment No. 97-18 and a response has been included(Attachment No. 6). Prior to any action on Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 97-18. Staff, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings. Coastal Status: The Huntington Beach ZSO is part of the City's Local Coastal Program(LCP). Therefore, zoning text amendments are subject to California Coastal Commission review and approval. This will be considered a minor amendment to the LCP. Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Public NotWcation: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on January 15, 1998 for the zoning text amendment . Notices were also sent to property owners of record within a 300 ft. radius of the property located at 20471 Bushard Street in conjunction with Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Variance 97-24(ADSOC Adult Day Care Center). Staff Report- 1/27/98 4 (98SR07) ANALYSIS: General Day Care uses are considered Public-Semi-Public uses and are currently permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit in multiple family residential zones, commercial, industrial and Public-Semi-Public zoning districts without any location and site criteria. They are not currently permitted within the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district. Prior to the adoption of the 1994 ZSO, General Day Care uses were considered Unclassified uses and were permitted within all residential and commercial zones including single family residential zones, subject to approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission(Attachment No. 4)pursuant to the Ordinance Code. The subject land use was not included in the permitted or conditionally permitted land use matrix for single family residential districts in the 1994 zoning code update due to concerns relating to potential impacts of general day care uses on residential uses. --- The subject zoning text amendment proposes to reinstate General Day Care uses within single family residential zones subject to review and approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. Staff believes that the request should be supported,but on a limited basis, subject to property location and development criteria. It is recommended that only parcels of 1.0 acre or greater in size and fronting an arterial be considered for development with General Day Care uses. The aforementioned limitations are intended to control the scale of future development within residential areas and advocate development that would convey the visual and physical scale and character of residential structures, and restrict development of General Day Care uses on parcels fronting neighborhood."edges"(arterials)thus minimizing impacts to core residential areas. With this criteria,the concerns raised in the 1994 zoning code update are addressed. The proposal, as modified to include the site and location criteria will be consistent with General Plan goals objectives and policies which encourage land use diversity and advocate development of institutional uses within all residential areas when such uses are designed and developed so as to convey the character of residential structures. Adult care uses provide a community benefit and are neighborhood serving uses. They offer unique services to residents and can be compatible with low density residential neighborhoods. The proposal to include General Day Care uses within single family residential areas is also consistent with land use policies and zoning of other municipalities in Orange County. Staff conducted a survey and found that the cities of Costa Mesa,Newport Beach, Fountain Valley, Santa Ana, and Westminster permit General Day Care uses within single family residential areas subject to approval of a conditional use permit. SUMMARY: Staff has evaluated the project with regard to general planning/land use compatibility issues and determined that the subject request will implement General Plan land use goals and will be compatible with adjacent developments. Staff Report- 1/27/98 5 (98SR07) Staff recommends approval of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 for the following reasons: . The proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. . The proposed zoning text amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan which encourage the development of institutional uses and service uses that support the City's resident needs within residential neighborhoods. . The proposed zoning text amendment would not permit development which would be detrimental to property or uses within the City in general. The scale of development shall be compatible with residential development adjacent to project sites. The projects shall convey a high quality visual image and character. Site specific development proposals shall be subject to location and site size criteria and shall require review and approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission to ensure the use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings of Approval for Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 2. Ordinance Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 3. Legislative Draft Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 4. Pre -1994 Ordinance Code provisions for General Day Care uses. 5. Negative Declaration No. 97-18 6. Environmental Review Board comments and Staff Response on Negative Declaration No. 97-18 AW:kjl Staff Report- 1/27/98 6 (98SR07) Huntington Beaeh Department of Community Development STAFF REFRY 01 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director BY: Amy Wolfe,Assistant Planner DATE: January 27, 1998 SUBJECT: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.97-3/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-55NARIANCE NO. 97-24/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-18 (ADSOC Adult Day Care Center) LOCATION: 20471 Bushard Street(NW corner of Bushard St. and Indianapolis Ave.) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for Planning Commission review is Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, a request initiated by the City of Huntington Beach to change the zone of the property located at 20471 Bushard Street from CG (General Commercial)to RL (Low Density Residential)in order to bring the subject parcel in consistency with the RL (Residential Low Density) General Plan designation,in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55,a request by Marko E. Botich to develop a 20,000 sq. ft. adult day care facility and fence and Variance No. No. 97-24 to allow a reduction of the setbacks along Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue from 15 ft. to 8 ft. Staff recommends approval of the proposed project for the following reasons: • The proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. With standard conditions of approval, mitigation measures and design modifications, all concerns are mitigated to a level of insignificance. • The proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of RL (Residential Low Density),with surrounding zoning and the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area. • The proposed project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan which encourage the development of institutional uses and service uses that support the City's resident needs within residential neighborhoods. • The proposed use of the property as an adult day care facility, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to property or uses in the area or the City in general. The project's scale shall be compatible with existing development adjacent to the project site. Architectural details and fenestration on the new structures shall articulate and segment the building massing. The project shall convey a high quality visual image and character. • The subject development proposal, as conditioned, shall be in compliance with the RL (Low Density Residential) zoning district regulations inclusive of landscape and off-street parking standards and City policies relating to site planning and architectural design considerations. Substantial building off- sets and building articulation shall be provided on building elevations. On-site landscaping and parking improvements will comply with Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO)requirements. • 16 S MCFAD I I . era song t ♦ I l ♦ w� ` I ♦ s'°a ` ♦ kuama . . _ PROJECT r � rvuxrs J � J ' 14 a r� e a + ••• • -Rocca 6 / I a+au�a.an ■ IIA4H+H:Ld. C" CF-E xmm r . a ScWW • VICINITY MAP ZMA NO. 97-3 / CUP 97-55 /VAR NO. 97-24 HUNnNGTQN BEACH HUVMGTOM BEACH M AWMG DD IMON RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: A. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-18 (Attachment No. 5 of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 Report);" B. "Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 (Attachment No. 2)with findings(Attachment No. 1) and forward to the City Council for adoption;" C. "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Variance No. 97-24 with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 4)." ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-18,Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 and Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Deny Variance No. 97-24 with findings for denial." B. "Approve Negative Declaration No. 97-18,Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 and Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Variance No. 97-24 with findings for denial." C. "Deny Negative Declaration No. 97-18,Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Variance No. 97-24 with findings for denial." D. "Continue Negative Declaration No. 97-18, Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Variance No. 97-24 and direct staff accordingly." GENERAL INFORMATION: APPLICANT: 1. City of Huntington Beach,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (ZMA) 2. Marko E. Botich, 6 Upper Newport Plaza,Newport Beach, CA 92660 (CUP &VAR) PROPERTY OWNER: Dennis Holtz, 20471 Bushard Street,Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REQUEST: Zoning Man Amendment: A zone change for the subject property from CG(General Commercial)to RL (Low Density Residential). Conditional Use Permit: To develop a 20,000 sq. ft.,two-story(35 ft. high) adult day care facility on a 1.03 acre parcel and to allow a 6 ft. high wrought iron fence in the setback areas along Indianapolis Avenue and Bushard Street. Variance: A variance to setback requirements to allow a reduction of the 15 ft. building setback along Bushard Street. DATE ACCEPTED: June 30, 1997 Staff Report- 1/27/98 2 (98sr08) SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING LAND USE Subject Property: RL-7 (Residential Low CG(General Commercial) Single Family Density-Maximum of 7.0 Residential dwelling units per net acre) North of Subject RL (Low Density Property Residential) East of Subject Property (across Bushard Street) South of Subject Property (across Indianapolis Avenue) West of Subject Property: PROJECT PROPOSAL: Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 represents a request to permit a zone change for a 1.03 acre parcel from CG(Commercial General)to RL (Low Density Residential)pursuant to Section 210.02, Residential Districts Established, of the ZSO (Attachment No. 3). Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 represents a request for the following: 1. To develop a 20,000 sq. ft.,two story adult day care center facility pursuant to Section 210.04 RL,RM, RMH, RH, and RMP Districts: Land Use Controls, of the ZSO. 2. Construct a 6 ft. high wrought iron and pilaster fence at a 5 ft setback in lieu of 15 ft. along Bushard Street and at a 4.66 ft. setback in lieu of 10 ft. along Indianapolis pursuant to Section 230.88 of the ZSO. 3. Construct a 35 ft. high building within the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district pursuant to Section 210.06 of the ZSO. Variance No. 97-24 represents a request to allow a minimum setback of 8 ft. for a portion of the building along Bushard Street in lieu of a minimum setback of 15 ft. pursuant to Section 210.06 RL, RM, RMH, RH, and RMP Districts: Property Development Standards. Staff Report- 1/27/98 3 (98srO8) All improvements will be constructed in one phase . The proposed facility will provide adult day care services to the elderly,the majority of whom have Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder. Eligibility is limited to frail elderly and adults age 18 and over,who have certain physical and cognitive impairments. The facility will be operated by Adult Day Services of Orange County(ADSOC). ADSOC currently operates.an adult day care facility, serving 50 clients, in Costa Mesa which would be relocated to this site. All participants in the Costa Mesa program are age 60 and over; however,regulations allow ADSOC to admit impaired adults age 18 and over into the facility. Any younger impaired adult who applies for admission to the facility is carefully screened for appropriateness and compatibility with the overall client population. Participants remain on site throughout the day and are not taken into the adjoining community(i.e. on walks). Services offered consist of supervision, activities and health related services inclusive of limited medical services,nursing services,physical, occupational and speech therapy,psychological services, social services, feeding, and secured perimeters for those who tend to wander. Hours of operation will be approximately 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday-Friday. The facility will not be open for day care services in the evenings,weekends or holidays. Board and Directors meetings (bi-monthly) and periodic workshops/seminars for caregivers (four to six workshops per year) are anticipated to take place outside the normal operating hours. The facility is designed for a maximum case load of 100 clients. The current staffing at the Costa Mesa facility is nine full time employees and nine part-time employees with the assistance of an average five volunteers per day. It is projected that at full capacity of 100 clients,the staffing will increase to an estimated 23 employees and six volunteers. The facility will serve the adult day care needs of Huntington Beach,Newport Beach, Costa Mesa and Fountain Valley. ISSUES: General Plan Conformance: The proposed zoning map amendment and adult day care center development request is consistent with the goals objectives and policies of the City's General Plan and the Land Use Element designation of RL (Residential Low Density) for the project site. The following General Plan policies support the subject request: LU 7 Achieve a diversity of land uses that sustain the City's economic viability, while maintaining the City's economic resources scale and character. L U 7.1 Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that a)provides for housing, commercial employment, educational, cultural, entertainment, and recreational needs of existing and future residents, b)provides employment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding subregion, c) captures visitor and tourist activity, and d)provides open space and aesthetic "relief'from urban development. LU7.1.1 Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Land Use and Density Schedules (Table LU-2a and 2b) LU9.4 Provide for the inclusion of recreational, institutional, religious, educational and service uses that support the resident needs within residential neighborhoods. Staff Report- 1/27/98 4 (98sro8) HRCI To promote the preservation and restoration of the sites, structures and districts which have architectural, historical, and/or archeological significance to the City of Huntington Beach (see discussion under ANALYSIS Section). Zoning Compliance: The zoning designation for the project site is proposed to be changed to RL(Low Density Residential). The development proposal will comply with the requirements of the RL zoning district with the exception of setback development standards. The applicant has filed a request for a variance to allow a reduction of the 15 ft. building setback along Bushard Street(front yard setback)to 8 ft. The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the proposed project with the development standards of RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district: SECTION ISSUE CODE PROVISION PROPOSED 210.06 Minimum B1dg.Site 6,000 sq. ft. 1.03 ac (44,867 sq. ft.) Area Minimum Bldg. Site 60 ft. 183.57 ft. Width Minimum Setbacks Front(Bushard St.) 15 ft. 8 ft. (bldg. setback)* 5 ft. (fence setback)** Ext. Side 10 ft. (bldg setback) 10 ft. (bldg setback) (Indianapolis Ave.) 4.66 ft. (fence setback)** Side (north) 5 ft. 51 ft. Rear(west) 10 ft. 51.5 ft. Maximum Height of 35 ft. (CUP if greater than 30 35 ft.** Structures ft.) Maximum Lot 50% 46% Coverage 232.08 Minimum Site 8% 25% Landscaping 231 Off-street Parking 34 p.s.(1 per staff member [TT p.s. and one per classroom)** * Variance request **Conditional Use Permit request Environmental Status: Staff has reviewed the environmental assessment and determined that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance with proper design and engineering. Subsequently,Negative Declaration No. 97-18 (Attachment No. 5 of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 Report)was prepared with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of the California Environment Quality Act(CEQA). The negative declaration analyzes the zoning text amendment, zoning map amendment, conditional use permit and variance associated with the proposed project. Staff Report- 1/27/98 5 (98sr08) The Department of Community Development advertised draft Negative Declaration No. 97-18 for twenty (20)days commencing on November 27, 1997 and ending on December 17, 1997. Comments were received from the City of Huntington Beach Environmental Review Board(Attachment No. 5 of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 Report) concerning transportation/circulation,biological resources and cultural resources issues addressed in.Environmental Assessment No. 97-18 and a response has been included with the negative declaration(Attachment No. 6 of Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3). Prior to any action on Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Variance No. 97-24, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Negative Declaration No. 97-18. Staff, is recommending that the negative declaration be approved with findings and mitigation measures. Coastal Status: Not applicable. edevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns: The Departments of Public Works and Fire, and Building Division have recommended conditions which are incorporated into the conditions of approval. The Police Department has no concerns. Public Nojj&ation: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on January 15, 1998, and notices were sent to property owners of record within a 300 ft. radius of the subject property, applicant, and interested parties including the Historic Resources Board. ANALYSIS: Zone Change The proposed zone change would bring the existing non-conforming zoning on the property into conformance with the existing General Plan land use designation. The proposed zoning map amendment from CG(General Commercial)to RL (Low Density Residential)is consistent with the existing General Plan Designation of RL (Residential Low Density) for the property and with existing uses in the area. The properties adjacent to the project site (east,west,north and south) are zoned for loci density residential development. The subject zone change in conjunction with a zone text amendment(ZTA No. 97-3)request which is under concurrent consideration for approval to allow general adult day care uses in low density residential zones on parcels over one acre fronting arterials,would allow for the development of the adult day care center in accordance with RL (Low Density Residential) development standards and implement land use goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. Staff Report- 1/27/98 6 (98sro8) s _ • _ Development Proposal The proposed site is located at the intersection of two primary arterial streets. Areas adjacent to the project site are predominately developed with one and two-story residential structures. The proposed project will result in a change in land use and the appearance of the site. Existing structures will be removed and replaced with a 20,000 sq. ft., 35 ft. high adult day care facility. Land Use Compatibili Access to the project site will be provided via two primary arterials: Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue. The project site's location minimizes impacts to local streets and residential "core"areas by virtue of its location at the intersection of two roadways which act as"edges"to residential enclaves. The proposed adult day care center will maintain significant building setbacks from adjacent residential areas. The facility will be sited 51 ft. from the northerly(side)property line and 51.5 ft. from the westerly (rear)property line. In addition, a 7 ft. landscape buffer in conjunction with a 6 ft. high wall will be provided along the aforementioned site perimeter areas. Staff believes that the subject development proposal has sufficiently addressed privacy and screening issues between the proposed facility and adjacent residential areas by means of landscaping setbacks and architectural design. The proposed hours of operation are 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday-Friday. The facility will not be open for day care services in the evenings, weekends or holidays. A limited number of meetings will take place outside the normal operating hours (bi-monthly Board of Directors meetings and four to six workshop/seminars for caregivers). Staff finds the proposed hours of operation to be compatible with adjacent residential uses. The proposed land use and hours of operation are more conservative than those associated with commercial development(24-hour operations/extended delivery hour schedules) anticipated under current CG(General Commercial)zoning. Staff recommends approval of extended hours of operation beyond those proposed by the applicant spanning between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday-Friday to allow flexibility in scheduling times. Traffic The project will generate additional vehicular movement on the surrounding street system. A traffic impact analysis for the proposed project was prepared by Steven-Garland Associates and estimated that the facility will generate 296 daily trips. The study analyzed the impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding street system and determined that the addition of traffic associated with the project will not have a significant impact on the roadway system and will allow all roadway segments affected by the additional traffic to operate within acceptable levels of service. Parking A parking utilization survey was conducted based on the existing adult day care center operated by ADSOC in Costa Mesa. The survey concluded that the parking demand for the existing 50 client facility was for 16 vehicles and projected that parking for 32 vehicles would be necessary to be provided at the new 100 client facility based on the number of participants. The proposed facility will include five classrooms and will be operated by 23 employees and 6 volunteers. The proposed development plan provides 34 off-street parking spaces and meets ZSO parking requirements for General Day Care uses based on a parking ratio of one parking space per staff member plus one per classroom. Staff Report- 1/27/98 7 (98sr08) Architecture The design of the building attempts to be compatible in nature with the general character of the surrounding area by maintaining a lower profile along street frontages and by providing significant building off-sets and architectural articulation. The proposed architectural concept incorporates a flat concrete tile roof with metal roof accents, smooth stucco exterior,metal awnings and extensive trellis design elements. Staff finds that generally,the proposed architectural concept conveys the physical and visual scale of the residential neighborhood and recommends approval of the proposed architectural concept. Building Height Structures between 30 ft.-35 ft. in height within the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district require approval of a conditional use permit by the Zoning Administrator. The applicant has requested approval of a 35 ft.high structure as part of the development request associated with the conditional use permit. The portions of the structure between 30 ft to 35 ft. in height will be setback approximately 31 ft. from the southerly property line (along Indianapolis Avenue), 33 ft. from the easterly property line (along Bushard Street), 98 ft from the northerly property line and 84 ft. from the westerly property line. Staff believes that the proposed building setbacks would mitigate any potential shade/shadow impacts to the adjacent residential areas and supports the applicant's building height request. Historical Structures/Cultural Resources The project site is the last remaining portion of the Holtz family farm and includes some of the original farm structures. The current on-site structures include a single family residence with garage, a storage building, and a barn. The site was previously evaluated for its cultural and historic significance and was designated as a local landmark in the General Plan due to its social significance,however, due to lack of historic significance the site was not considered"eligible"for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The subject proposal was presented and was endorsed by the Historic Resources Board on November 6, 1997. The Historic Resources Board recommended comprehensive photographic documentation of the project site,to be prepared prior to issuance of demolition permits and in accordance with Historical American Buildings Survey/Historical American Engineering Records(HABS/HAER) standards in conjunction with a biography of the Holtz family history. The documentation, once completed will be filed with the City Clerk's Office for purposes of preserving information of local social significance for future generations. Code Enforcement Staff inquired on issues related to code enforcement activities/complaints associated with the existing ADSOC adult day care facility in Costa Mesa. The day care center in Costa Mesa is operated in conjunction with and on the site of an elementary school(Rey Elementary) at 661 W. Hamilton. The center has been in operation at that location since 1982. No complaints or code enforcement issues were reported to staff by Costa Mesa city officials. Staff Report- 1/27/98 8 (98sro8) Building& Fence Setbacks The applicant has requested a building setback variance to allow a reduction of the 15 ft. front yard setback along Bushard Street to 8 ft. Currently,the Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue street scenes are dominated by masonry walls enclosing rear and exterior side yards of residential zoned parcels. Staff believes that sufficient grounds for granting the requested variance exist as the project is located on a corner lot and development on it is limited by front and exterior side yard building setbacks. Although as an alternative to requesting and approving a variance it would be possible to set the building back towards the rear property line,this action would result in moving the project closer to the westerly adjoining residential uses. Staff finds that in this case maintaining the maximum possible setbacks from residences would be preferable because it would minimize potential impacts between the two land uses. Moreover staff believes that the project's scale and design will convey quality visual characteristics and will be compatible with adjacent uses,the building massing and architectural treatment in conjunction with landscaping and on-site circulation and parking improvements will improve the appearance of the development and its surroundings and will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. Therefore staff recommends approval of the requested building variance. The submitted development plan depicts a series of 6 ft high wrought iron fences with stucco finish pilasters within 5 ft. from the front property line and 4.66 ft from the exterior side property line in lieu of 15 ft. and 10 ft. respectively. Currently, concrete block walls line the exterior perimeter property lines of the lots to the north and west of the project site along Indianapolis Avenue and Bushard Street. Fence setback requirements are intended to encourage pedestrian friendly development and prevent a"walled- off'effect along street frontages. Staff believes that the proposed design meets the intend of the provision for visual setbacks along street frontages and recommends approval of the proposed fence locations. SUMMARY: Staff has evaluated the project with regard to general planning/land use compatibility issues and determined that the subject request will implement General Plan land use goals and will be compatible with adjacent developments. Staff recommends approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55, and Variance 97-24 for the following reasons: • The proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. With standard conditions of approval,mitigation measures and site design modifications, all concerns are mitigated to a level of insignificance. The proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of RL (Residential Low Density), with surrounding zoning and the existing and proposed development in the surrounding area. • The proposed project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan which encourages the development of institutional uses and service uses that support the City's resident needs within residential neighborhoods. Staff Report- 1/27/98 9 (98srO8) • The proposed use of the property as an adult day care facility, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to property or uses in the area or the City in general. The project's scale shall be compatible with existing development adjacent to the project site. Architectural details and fenestration on the new structures shall articulate and segment the building massing. The project shall convey a high quality visual image and character. The subject development proposal, as conditioned, shall be in compliance with the RL (Low Density Residential)zoning district regulations inclusive of landscape and off-street parking standards and City policies relating to site planning and architectural design considerations. Substantial building off- sets and building articulation shall be provided on building elevations. On-site landscaping and parking improvements will comply with ZSO requirements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings of Approval for Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 2. Draft Ordinance Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 3. Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Designations 4. Findings and Suggested Conditions of Approval for Negative Declaration No. 97-18, Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 and Findings of Denial for Variance No. 97-24 5. Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations dated January 12, 1998 6. Narrative AW:kjl Staff Report- 1/27/98 10 (98sr08) ATTACHMENT 9 OW OF HUNMNGTON BEACH PIANNINGDIWSION tic ENVIRO At t!+ '` L ASSESSAUM NO. 9 7-IS 1. PROJECT TITLE: Adult Day Care Facility Concurrent Entitlements: Conditional Use Permit No. 97-55 Variance No. 97-24 Zoning Text Amendment No. 97-3 Zoning Map Amendment No. 97-3 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Contact:Amy Wolfe,Assistant Planner Phone: (714) 536-5596 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 20471 Bushard Street. The northwest corner of the intersection of Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue.Refer to Attachment 1 Project Vicinity Map. 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: Adult Day Services of Orange County 6 Upper Newport Plaza Newport Beach,CA 92660 Contact:Marco Botich 5. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Existing:RL-7 (Low Density Residential) Proposed:RL-7 (Low Density Residential) ZONING Existing:CG (General Commercial) Proposed:RL(Low Density Residential) 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: &* t Background The project site encompasses approximately 1 acre located on the northwest corner of Bushard Street and Indianapolh Avenue. The site is the last remaining portion of the Holtz Family Farm and includes some of the original farrr structures.The current on-site structures include:a single family residence with garage,a storage building,and a barn Surrounding uses include residential uses to the north, south, east, and west. Three schools are also located in thf vicinity of the site. The closest school to the project site is Isaac Sowers Elementary which is located south o' Indianapolis Avenue between Bushard Street and Magnolia Street.A park is also located at this site. St. Francis privatt middle school is located at the corner of Magnolia Street and Indianapolis Avenue.An elementary school (Dr. Ralph E Howes) and park site is located off Bushard Street north of the project site. &2 ect Descrintron The proposed project consists of a Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Zoning Map Amendment and a Zoning Tex Amendment to develop the site as an adult day care facility.Adult Day Services of Orange County (ADSOC) operates al Environmental Assessment No.97-18 1 11/19/9 O\W UMSENKRA DOC 5. \ existing adult day care facility,serving 50 clients,in Costa Mesa which would be relocated to this site. The facility will be an approximately 20,000 sq. ft., two story (35 ft. tall) building with 34 parking spaces. The structure will be constructed in one phase.The building will provide adult day care uses consisting of supervision,activities,and health- related services to the frail elderly, the majority of whom have Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder. Eligibility is limited to frail elderly and adults, age 18 and over, who have certain physical and cognitive impairments. All participants currently in the program within Costa Mesa are age 60 and over; however, regulations allow ADSOC to admit impaired adults age 18 and over into the facility. Any younger impaired adult who applies for admission is screened carefully for appropriateness and compatibility with the overall client population. Participants remain on site 'throughout the day and are not taken into the adjoining community (i.e., on walks). Services offered will include: medical services, nursing services, physical, occupational and speech therapy, psychological services, social services, recreational and social activities, hot meals and nutritional services, assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, and feeding, and secured perimeters for those who tend to wander. Hours of operation will be approximately 7:30 a.m. to 5:30'p.m. Monday— Friday. The facility will not be open for day care services in the evenings, weekends or holidays. Some meetings take place outside the normal operating hours for Board of Directors meetings (which are bimonthly) and periodic workshops/seminars for caregivers (four (4) to six (6) workshops per year). The facility is designed for a maximum case load of 100 clients. The current staffing is 9 full-time employees and 9 part-time employees with the assistance of an average 5 volunteers per day. When the facility reaches full capacity of 100 clients, the staffing will increase to an estimated 23 employees and 6 volunteers. It is the intent of the facility to service Newport Beach, Costa Mesa,Fountain Valley and the Huntington Beach areas. A comparison of the development standards for the RL Zone and the project proposal is detailed on the table below. The applicant is requesting an amendment to section 210.04 (table on page 210-3) of the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, to allow General Day Care Facilities within RL Districts. The City of Huntington Beach is also concurrently processing a Zone Map Amendment which is necessary to bring the General Plan designation (RL-7 Low Density Residential) for the project site into consistency with the zoning. Moreover the applicant is requesting a Variance to building setback requirements to allow a reduction of the 15 ft. and 10 ft.building setback along Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue to 8 ft.and 4.66 ft.respectively. DevelopmentProperty Required by Standard Proposed by Project Minimum Building Site --Lot Area 6,000 sq ft 44,866.8 sq ft --Frontage 60 ft 235 ft on Indianapolis 180 ft on Bushard Minimum Setbacks --Front Bushard St 15 ft 8 ft --Side 5 ft 51.5 ft --Street Side Indianapolis Ave 10 ft 4.66 ft --Rear loft 51 ft Maximum Height --Dwellings 35 ft 35 ft --Accessory Structures 15 ft N/A Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 30% Usable Open Space NA 5,000 sq ft Upper-Story Setbacks NA 15 ft average Landscaping General Tree Landsc.Req. 25% Lighting NA Parking Lot Fences and Walls 6 ft 6 ft Off-Street Parking and Loading NA 34 spaces 7.OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): None;Except NPDES permit needed from Regional Water Quality Control Board. Environmental Assessment No. 97-18 2 11/19/97 GAWOLMSEMOR-IMOC 5. ai ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impac that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"or is"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated,"as indicated by the checklist of the following pages. ❑Land Use&Planning ❑Transportation/Circulation ❑Public Services ❑Population&Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities&Service Systems ❑Geological Problems ❑Energy&Mineral Resources ❑Aesthetics ❑Water ❑Hazards © Cultural Resources ❑Air Quality ❑Noise ❑ Recreation ❑Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but that at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or is "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ❑ REPORT is required,but it must a lyze o the effects that remain to be addressed. 11 1! /!1 :7 S ature Date Wolfe Assistant Planner Printed Name Title Environmental Assessment No.97-18 3 11%19/9 QIWOLFE15eiI0R-I.DOC S. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A "No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. . 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level,indirect as well as direct,and construction as well as operational impacts. S. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate, if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or if the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is warranted. 4. "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact."The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII,"Earlier Analyses,"may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. References to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances) have been incorporated into the checklist.A source list has been provided in Section XVII. Other sources used or individuals contacted have been cited in the respective discussions. 7. The following checklist has been formatted after Appendix I of Chapter 3,Title 14,California Code of Regulations, but has been augmented to reflect the City of Huntington Beach's requirements. (Note: Standard Conditions of Approval - The City imposes standard conditions of approval on projects which are considered to be components of or modifications to the project, some of these standard conditions also result in reducing or minimizing environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. However,because they are considered part of the project, they have not been identified as mitigation measures. For the readers' information, a list of applicable standard conditions identified in the discussions has been provided as Attachment No. 3. SAMPLE QUESTION.- Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Leas Than ISSUES(and Supporting Information Sources): S{gnrfrcant Mitigation S,jgnificant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving.• Landslides orMud&ws?(Sources:1, 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion.The attached source list explains that I is the Huntington Beach General Plan and 6 is a topographical map of the area which show that the area is located rn a flat area. Note.•This response probably would not require further explanation). I Environmental Assessment No.97-18 4 11/19/9 7 awoc�oa-�.coc 5.4 rotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING.Would the Proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ ❑ 19 ❑ (Sources: 3,4) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Source: 3) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ❑ ❑ 9 ❑ vicinity? (Sources: 1) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., ❑ ❑ IN ❑ impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible uses)? (Source: 3) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 established community (including a low-income or minority community)? (Sources: 1,2,3) Environmental Assessment No.97-18 5 11/19/9' a VIOLFELUMORADW 5.� • rotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The site is designated on the City of Huntington Beach Land Use Plan of the General Plan as RL-7 (Low Density Residential) and zoned CG (General Commercial)..The project is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The project includes a City-initiated Zoning Map Amendment request to change the CG zoning to RL and bring it into conformance with the General Plan designation (RL-7 Low Density Residential) for the project site. The applicant requests the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for development of adult day care facilities under the proposed zoning. The proposed use was deleted as a conditionally permitted use within residential districts when the zoning code was updated and adopted in 1994; therefore the applicant is also requesting a Zoning Text Amendment to re-establish the use as a conditionally permitted use in the RL zone. With the exception of building front yard and exterior side yard setbacks, the project is consistent with the development standards of the RL zone and planned use of the site. The applicant has requested approval of a variance to allow a reduction of the 15 ft. front yard building setback along the Bushard Street and the 10 ft. exterior side yard setback along Indianapolis Avenue to 8 ft.and 4.66 ft.respectively. The site is surrounded by land designated as residential. Based on the proposed use operational characteristics, and applicable project development standards and conditions(i.e., wall,landscaping, setbacks) the proposed use (with the incorporation of conditions of approval) is not anticipated to be incompatible with the existing adjacent residential land uses (Potential traffic, noise,aesthetic related compatibility issues are discussed in greater detail under sections VI,X and XIII respectively). According to CEQA Guidelines and the State Department of Conservation, a project will have a significant effect on the environment if it will convert at least 80-acres of prime agricultural land to non-agricultural uses or impair the agricultural productivity of prime agricultural land. Although the proposed project will remove structures once associated with farming, it will not result in the elimination of land currently farmed. The proposed project will not affect the productivity of other agricultural land in the vicinity. The project does not propose any elements that would significantly disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of the surrounding community.The project will not conflict with any environmental plans or policies of the City of Huntington Beach. H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local ❑ ❑ ❑ 99 population projections? (Sources: 3,5) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either ❑ ❑ ® ❑ directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Sources:3,5) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable ❑ ❑ B ❑ housing? (Source: 5) Environmental Assessment No.97-18 6 11/19/9' 01W0LM,1M R LDOC Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The. new facility may contribute to employment opportunities in the area, the proposed tenants will employ up to 23 staff members. Many employees are anticipated to be transferred from an existing facility in Costa Mesa and are likely established in existing residential communities. The proposed project is expected to have a negligible impact on projected population of the City, and will displace one housing unit. This project is not expected to significantly influence population growth or housing availability. III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS.Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (Source: 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 b) Seismic ground shaking? (Source: 6) ❑ ❑ ® ❑ c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (Sources: 6,7,8) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (Sources: 3, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 6,8) e) Landslides or Mudflows? (Source: 3,6) ❑ ❑ ❑ f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil ❑ ❑ W ❑ conditions from excavation,grading,or fill? (Sources: 6,8) g) Subsidence of the land? (Sources: 3,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ O h) Expansive soils? (Sources: 3,6,8) ❑ ❑ ® ❑ i) Unique geologic or physical features? (Sources: 6, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 8) Discussion: The project site is not located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Hazards Zone. Therefore, no significant impacts due to ground rupture are anticipated. Structures built in California are required to comply with standards set forth in the Uniform Building Code to minimize the structural risks from ground shaking. The project site is located within the State of California Seismic Hazards Zone and will be required to comply with Seismic Hazard Mapping Act provisions and requirements. According to the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Technical Background Report the project site is situated in an area which is susceptible to liquefaction during earthquakes.Earth shaking could cause unequal settlement and movement in this area which could lead to structural damage or collapse. In the event of an earthquake in the Huntington Beach area,the site may be subject to ground shaking. Development will be subject to conditions requiring a detailed soils analysis to be prepared by a Registered Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application (see condition No.20.f on Attachment#3). The project site is not located in an area subject to Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazards nor landslides or mudflows according to the General Plan. Project approval will allow for construction of new structures; however, this will not include any significant change in grade. Grading and site preparation during development may result in short term wind and water Environmental Assessment No.97-18 7 11/19/97 awo�,a►on_�mc 5-7 • •Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact erosion impacts. Development will be subject to standard conditions of approval requiring implementation of a grading plan and dust control measures as well as a detailed soils analysis (see conditions No. 1.a-e and 20.f on Attachment#3).No significant impacts from grading are anticipated.According to the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Figure EH-9, the project site is not situated is an area with subsidence potential. According to the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Figure EH-12,the project site is located within an area of low (7%or less) expansive soils. The project does not include any activities that will impact earth stability of geologic substructures. The site is primarily flat,and does not contain any unique physical or geologic features. IV. WATER.Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,or ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ the rate and amount of surface runoff? (Sources:2) b) Exposure of people or property to water related ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ hazards such as flooding? (Sources: 9) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Sources: 1,6) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any. ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 water body? (Sources: 1,6) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 water movement? (Sources: 1,6) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (Sources: 3,6) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 (Sources: 6,8) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (Sources: 6,8) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 i) Substantial reduction in the amount of .❑ ❑ 0 ❑ groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (Sources: 5,8) Environmental Assessment No.97-18 8 11/19/97 aAWOLFE MOR-11= 5�� • •Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion:New impervious surfaces as well as construction related activities may increase the amount of storm water runoff and may result in changes in drainage patterns and currents, or the course or direction of water movement.Drainage from the project site will be directed to the street and conveyed into the existing storm system. Currently the existing storm drainage systems are adequate to handle flows. This project is subject to National Pollution Elimination Discharge Standards regarding discharge into storm drains. The project site is located in Flood Zone A-99. This A-99 Flood Zone is the result of a revision to the previous zone AO. This change was made by the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) on April 30, 1996. The Zone A-99 designation is used to identify areas that are protected by a Federal flood protection system under construction from flood having a 1 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood) with no base flood elevation (BFEs) determined. Due to the location of the project site within the A-99 zone, significant flooding impacts to the project are not anticipated. The project in and of itself does not propose any excavation or other activities that could impact groundwater quality.The site does not drain directly into any natural body of water. V. AIR QUALITY.Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ existing or projected air quality violation? (Sources: 10, 15) b) Expose sensitive receptors to.pollutants? (Source: ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 1) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 (Source: 2) d) Create objectionable odors?(Source:2) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: Short-term:Construction of the facility may result in an increase in dust and construction equipment emissions. However, with implementation of conditions of approval requiring dust control during project construction (see condition No. I on Attachment#3),no significant adverse impacts are anticipated. Long-term At buildout, the project will generate approximately 296 vehicle trips per day based on the traffic analysis prepared by Stevens-Garland Associates. Using the data from the 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook produced by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), the project operations and associated vehicle trips are not expected to produce emissions that will significantly impact air quality. The emissions generated by the 296 vehicle trip are below the thresholds established by AQMD. The facility currently has a contract with Western Transit for one 15 passenger van to assist in providing transportation to and from the site. All activities will occur within proposed buildings. None of the operations within the proposed facility will produce any noticeable objectionable odors. No impacts to air quality are anticipated. The project will not alter ambient temperatures,moisture or airflow. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (Sources: ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 2, 11, 15) Environmental Assessment No.97-18 9 11/19/97 (MWOLFVS q=_Lnoc • •Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp ❑ ❑ 9 ❑ curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Sources:2, 15) c) Inadequate emergency access or inadequate access to ❑ ❑ ❑ 9 nearby uses? (Sources: 1,2, 15) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ❑ ❑ © ❑ (Sources:2, 15) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ❑ ❑ © ❑ (Sources: 2, 15) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? (Sources: 2, ❑ ❑ ❑ 9 15) g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? (Source: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ IN Discussion: The project will generate additional vehicular movement on the surrounding street system. A traffic analysis has been prepared for the proposed project by Stevens-Garland Associates. The study analyzed the impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding street system to determine potential impacts. Based on the Stevens-Garland Associates traffic and parking study (Traffic Impact Analysis, September 1997),at project buildout,it is estimated that the facility will generate on the surrounding street system approximately 296 daily trips. Five intersections in proximity to the project where analyzed by the traffic report: Bushard/ Adams, Bushard/Indianapolis, Bushard/Atlanta, Indianapolis/Magnolia, and Indianapolis/Brookhurst. The analysis states that the majority of roadway segments are currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) A under existing conditions,with the exception of the intersection of Bushard and Adams at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak hour; all of which are within acceptable Levels of Service (LOS D or better) as established by the City's General Plan. Based on the traffic analysis, the addition of traffic associated with the proposed project will allow all roadway segments to continue to operate at the same Level of Service.The study also analyzed traffic impacts at the above five intersection's using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. ICU values are computed and based upon an intersections traffic volume and its traffic-carrying capacity(i.e.,a V/C ratio).Based upon this analysis it has been determined that the project will also contribute to an increase in the ICU values.The project's impact on the ICU values ranges from 0.003 to 0.017 for the a.m. peak hour and from 0.002 to 0.010 for the p.m. peak hour.These increases are considered to be insignificant. Based on the parking utilization survey conducted at the existing adult day care center that is operated by ADSOC in Costa Mesa,the existing facility has a peak parking demand of 16 vehicles,which includes employees'vehicles and the drop-off/pick-up vehicles that are parked for a short duration at the site. The parking survey was conducted for the existing facility, which has 50 participants, and since the proposed facility has up to 100 participants,the study assumed that the parking demand would double for the proposed facility.Based on this methodology,the study projected that the proposed adult day care center would have a peak parking demand of 32 vehicles.The site plan indicates that 34 on-site parking spaces are proposed,therefore,no parking impacts are anticipated. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 10 11/19/97 01WOLFEI MORAMM 5,1( •Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Access to the facility will be provided by two driveways,one on Bushard Street and one on Indianapolis Avenue. These driveways would accommodate both inbound and outbound traffic and either driveway could be used to access the on-site.parking lot. The proposed project (with the incorporation of conditions of approval) will not result in hazards to safety from design.features or incompatible uses,insufficient.parking capacity on-site or off- site, hazards or barriers for pedestrian or bicyclists, conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation or rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts. Project conditions of approval will ensure that design features associated with project ingress/egress is adequate. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their ❑ ❑ ❑ habitats (including but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals,and birds)? (Source: 5) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? ❑ ❑ © ❑ (Source: 5) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak ❑ ❑ ❑ forest,coastal habitat,etc.)?(Source: 5) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal ❑ ❑ ❑ pool)? (Source: 5) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (Source: 5) ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion:There are no known endangered,threatened or rare plant or animal species on the site.No significant effects are anticipated. Mature trees may be impacted by project construction. A condition of approval of this project will require preparation of an Arborist report to identify,quantify and analyze the health of existing trees on site. The report will also recommend how existing trees that are to remain (if any) will be protected and how far construction and grading will be kept from the tree trunk. Moreover,any existing mature trees removed from the site will be required to be replaced at a 2:1 ratio with 36"box trees (see condition No.4 on Attachment#3). The proposed project site does not support a unique or endangered animal species. No significant adverse environmental impacts are associated. VIE. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a). Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ❑ ❑ ❑ (Source: 3) b) Use non-renewable resource in a wasteful and ❑ ❑ ❑ go inefficient manner? (Sources: 3,6) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ 99 resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (Sources: 3,6) Environmental Assessment No.97-18 11 11/19/97 WWOL ,sENww-WOO • •rotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: Implementation of the proposed project will result in increased fuel and energy consumption within the City However, the .anticipated energy demands created by the project are within parameters of:overall projected demand which is planned to be met for the area.In addition,the project will be subject to conditions of approval which require implementation of Title 24 Conservation measures for construction (see condition # 241) on Attachment#3).No significant adverse impacts to natural resources are anticipated.The development of the site will not result in the loss of a known mineral resource. IX. HAZARDS.Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (Sources:2,6) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 or emergency evacuation plan? (Sources:2,6) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 hazards? (Source:2) d) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 grass,or trees? (Sources:2,6) Discussion: The uses proposed by the project would not be anticipated to stock items that are classified as hazardous materials. However, a standard condition of the future development will require that these types of materials will be stored in compliance with the Uniform Fire Code regulations for these materials (see condition No.241) on Attachment#3).No significant health impacts are anticipated. The proposed development will not result in any impediments to emergency response or evacuation plans,and is not located in an area of flammable brush,grass or trees. X. NOISE.Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Sources:2,6, 12) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Sources: ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 1,2,12) Discussion:The principal source of noise in the project vicinity is related to vehicular traffic.Traffic related noise occurs from the two arterial streets (Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue) that are located adjacent to the project site. Construction Noise:Residential uses near the project may experience audible noise levels from construction of the facility. The types of construction activities (minor grading, paving, building construction, and landscaping installation) associated with the proposed project do not generate high levels of noise and are temporary. Existing traffic noise from adjacent arterials is expected to assist in masking some of the construction noise. Construction activities also will be subject to compliance with the Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance which limits the hours of construction to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.,Monday through Saturday,and will help to further minimize the potential construction noise impacts. With existing ambient traffic noise levels, compliance with Chapter 8.40 Noise of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code regarding decibel levels,hours of Environmental Assessment No.97-18 12 11/19/97 01WOLMIMMOR-11M 5.1� Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact construction to minimize noise impacts to adjacent properties and implementation of mitigation measure 1, no significant construction noise impacts are anticipated. Oyerational Noise:The project site is located within an area where the ambient noise levels are below 60 dB(A). Based on the type of use proposed at the site,the hours of operation and number of vehicle trips per day during peak activities,it is estimated that the project will result in an increase of noise levels of less than 3 decibels from activities associated with parking (e.g. car doors etc.). Although detectable levels of noise increases are very subjective, it is generally accepted that noise levels of less than 3 decibels are not noticeable to the human ear. Therefore,no significant noise impacts are anticipated. Xl. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (Source:Huntington Beach Fire Dept.) ❑ ❑ © ❑ b) Police Protection? (Source: Huntington Beach Police ❑ ❑ © ❑ Dept.) c) Schools? (Source:School Districts) ❑ ❑ ❑ 19 d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (Source:City of Huntington Beach) ❑ ❑ © ❑ I e) Other governmental services? (Source: City of ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Huntington Beach) Discussion: The proposed project has been reviewed by the various City Departments, including Public Works, Fire and Police,for compliance with all applicable City codes. With the implementation of conditions of approval, and compliance with City specifications,no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (Sources: 5,6) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ b) Communication systems? (Sources: 5,6) ❑ ❑ ® ❑ c) Local or regional water treatment or distri'bution ❑ ❑ ® ❑ facilities? (Sources: 5,6) . d) Sewer or septic tanks? (Sources: 5,6) ❑ ❑ © ❑ e) Storm water drainage? (Sources: 5,6) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ f) Solid waste disposal? (Sources: 5,6) ❑ ❑ IN ❑ g) Local or regional water supplies? (Sources: 5,6) ❑ ❑ © ❑ Environmental Assessment No.97-18 13 11/19/97 4\WOLFEIS�-IMOC 5. 1rotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The proposed project has been reviewed by the various City Departments, including Public Works, and the_Water Division, for compliance with all applicable City codes..This project will be required to meet National Pollution Discharge Elimination Standards for discharge into storm drains. With the implementation of conditions of project approval,and compliance with City specifications,no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. XIII. AESTHETICS.Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?(Sources: 1,3) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ❑ ❑ 17 (Sources: 1,2) c) Create light or glare? (Sources:2) ❑ ❑ © ❑ Discussion: The project will result in a change in the appearance of the site. Existing structures will be removed and replaced with a two story, 35 ft. tall, 20,000 sq. ft. adult day care facility. Areas adjacent to the site are predominately developed with one and two-story residential structures.The design of the building attempts to be compatible with the general character of the surrounding area by maintaining, to a certain extent, a lower building profile along street frontages. The applicant has requested approval of a building setback variance to allow a reduction of the 15 ft. front yard setback along Bushard Street and the 10 ft exterior sideyard setback along Indianapolis Avenue to 8 ft. and 4.66 ft. respectively. The site is not located in the vicinity,of any scenic vista. Project conditions of approval will ensure implementation of applicable development standards, therefore resolving potential aesthetic impacts of the proposed project. The project will introduce some increased light sources on the project site. The project proposes parking lot and other exterior security lighting. Although the project will result in an increase in light in the area, due to the existing light sources in the area, the project's contribution to ambient lighting in the area is considered negligible. The project includes a 6 ft. wall at the property line which will assist in minimizing light spillage to neighboring areas. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval which require that lighting be directed to prevent spillage onto adjacent properties. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES.Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Source: 14) ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Source: 14) ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Affect historical resources? (Source: 7) ❑ ® ❑ ❑ d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which ❑ ❑ ❑ would affect unique ethnic cultural values?(Source: 5) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the ❑ ❑ ❑ potential impact area? (Source: 5), Discussion:The project site has a single family residence and support structures previously used for farming.The property represents the last remaining portion of the Holtz Family Farm and includes some of the original farm structures.The current on-site structures include:a single family residence with garage,a storage building,and a barn.The Historic Resources Board(HRB) for the City of Huntington Beach has generated a list of local landmarks Environmental Assessment No.97-18 14 11/19/97 a WOUSSEMORA OC AL • 1011otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact considered to be of significant importance to the local community. The significance of a structure or a place is based upon its overall contribution to the community by either its historical, age, cultural, social, or visual functions. The house and barn.currently located on the project site have been placed on this list of local landmarks. The structures on-site are not listed with the National Register of Historic Places.Although the site is not listed on the National Register, the removal of the structures from the project site will effect the historical context,physical and architectural resources of the City of Huntington Beach as defined by the list of Significant Structures by the HRB. The HRB considered the subject proposal and determined that removal of the structures will not result in a significant impact if the site is adequately documented by mitigation measures 2 and 3. The site is not located in the vicinity of any identified archaeological sites, paleontological sites, or cultural resources. XV. RECREATION.Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ❑ ❑ ❑ parks or other recreational facilities? (Sources: 1,2) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The proposed project will not increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities,nor will it affect existing recreational opportunities. Demand for recreational facilities are typically generated by introduction of additional users associated with residential development, or due to loss of recreational facilities or recreation designated property.No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ ❑ 17 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Sources:2,6) Discussion:There are no significant wildlife or biological resources on the site,and the project will therefore not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal.No significant adverse impacts are anticipated. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- ❑ ❑ ❑ IN term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (Sources: 3) Discussion: The project does not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 15 11/19/97 Q-iw0LFE%SEN=-1MW L� � . N *Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively ❑ ❑ © ❑ considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (Sources: 3) Discussion: See discussion of items no. I-XV above. After implementation of city policies,project conditions and proposed mitigation,the project will not have impacts that could be cumulatively considerable. d) Does the project have environmental effects which will ❑ ❑ ❑ 17 cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Sources:2) Discussion: See discussion of items No. I-XV above.The project does not have environmental impacts which will cause adverse impacts to human beings. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 16 11/19/97 aAwarESEMn-IMM 5.1,° XVII.EARLIER ANALYSIS Earlier analyses may be used where,pursuant to tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process,one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis Reference# Document Title Available for Review at: 1 Project Vicinity Map See Attachment#1 2 Project Plans See Attachment#2 3 City of Huntington Beach General Plan City of Huntington Beach Community Development Dept., Planning/Zoning Information Counter,3rd Floor 2000 Main St.,Huntington Beach 4 City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision " Ordinance 5 City of Huntington Beach Environmental Impact Report for " General Plan Update 6 City of Huntington Beach General Plan Technical " Background Report for General Plan Update 7 City of Huntington Beach Historic District Location Map, " Historic and Cultural Resources Element 8 Geotechnical Inputs " for City of Huntington Beach 9 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (April, 1996) " 10 Air Quality Handbook, South Coast Air Quality " Management District 11 Trip Generation,4th Edition " Institute of Transportation Engineers 12 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office,2nd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 13 City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach Community CEQA Procedures Handbook Development Dept., Planning/Zoning Information Counter,3rd Floor 2000 Main St.,Huntington Beach 14 City of Huntington Beach Archaeological Site Vicinity Map " 15 Traffic Impact Analysis,Stevens-Garland Associates " I Environmental Assessment No.97-18 17 11/19/97 QIWOLPM MOR-11= Attachment No. 1 Project Vicinity Map Environmental Assessment No.97-18 18 11/19/97 a%wa FVSEN a-11= aD aD ■ _ ��E3�'�a�IMINIM IIII IFf: 1� e : Ni111111111 :i 'h♦ :•IIII ■■11/::p • III IIII� 1 •• Iuu1111u1 ■■/ ■IIII ■►- �. �■ --- �`■IIIIIIII .■ C ��- .-:III.■- - ,.�.., /111����11'Ili ■�■ � �,:.■■■ 0 � ■ ►�i --;-■ .- -- i�IIIIIIII ' ��III'�-- ■. .■_IIIi.�1111111i ■ =I/ �,��■_■/� r-'.--=-■ ■�. � ■�a�����/������I ■ 1lll�� ■ 111111I\r���1►'IIIII1�111 111111■ � . ��IIIIIIIIIt111111111II � � �111/���\�IIIIIIIi/�,■Iueelleleel .■ �. �. .. i • ■11 \�i ■■!■!IIII■ milli NINO �■ ■k�� �� ii iii Mi u,■11�1■��■■!■■IIII mow :�'�IIIIIIII �C MM -- ■■ ■ in'iI/IIIIIIII - ► -- -- �� M: ■ 11'�I■t ■■■IIIII■ ■ �� - ►�\■ .■ . ■ Z��iii 1■ ■C ■�\IIIIIIII ■ ����i -■ ■; IIII■■\�- �1 �� i� 11111II M� IIIIIIII .. IIIII ■■■�:.■ ■■■II■II. Q� �I/IIIIIIII � --.�hI11111i ��..III " CC � �"-�,:, �■ �/■ -- -�\IIIIIIII ii �:Illlllllu ii II � �■.(IIII ■.■11,■ ■■■!■■■■■■ -C ■I/I/IIICII I//11111111.1111111111\��►D` :1�111,1r 1■■�� ■■■■■■■■■■��• z Lill H11111111111I�� �'IIIIIIIIIII/I� �'plti Q�����I� lHIIIIIII/It111iN� �I111111 IIIII■ �� �i� -� II■.III `IIIII■ mm-��i �� lll,i111111111 ■11. ,., ni1111 IIIIL,.■■ ��, 3 �, - - IIIII■ �-'.. -.F■■�■\ M■ w.w_r ice. . ��:�■� III .�°•�,�I� C� f 111 11 1 ■ .ram -- �r 1 111 �� �II1111I IIIIIICIIi EE M"ii -i �I�Illi m1�1111111� :i����11111 Cry ■. a■ _- - ■ ►t.�. . II11111Iliu■IIII!■ -� CS -�■ -- - `IIIII- -��\III/IIII C CIeI1II, III i� i Illllli = � - IIIIIIIIIIII • �IIIW� � : � 11111I- � 11IIIIIIIIIIi■�� � i IIIIIIII ■■'- rI1111i 111111111111IItt■ • IIIIi11�1 �iiilnl II► I�i�llelee:' IIII11 •• •• -- • i11tt11�1�1 �•I 1MINIM �� MINIM III� IIIIIIIIIII =•�'••''MM • - - -- - 11111111111�/� 1 ■Q Q. �111IIIIIIIHI �:: jb\I1\% 1111111111111111 - CCd . 6g�- IIIIIIII�i -M "- -- -M 1I111111111 MC: C , . --. -- --.-- - IIIIIIII ■ -.MIC�-■ ■■ ■■ .�ME CM MMM MCM�-� �- II ■ ■■.■n i�'111111111 -- ■ ■;-■.■■ --.■■i -� ■.,.■ III - ■■` no ■�\IIIIIIII =ii � - -5��������■ -- -- -■� IIIIIIII\� - ■ •III.-�/IIIIIIII -- - I � IIII111111111111 �� :: Cp IIIIIIIIII �i IIIIIII i1I111t11111 ii � I �1111111:11111 III%A��i IIIIIIII\� fI/111611111111'IHIM Il1I I Attachment No. 2 Project Plans Environmental Assessment No.97-18 19 11/19/97 a,�►.coc 5.at N a ------------- RESIDENTIAL RESIDMAl ,a I ==-rrmmmnrmere APT 0 e1s J m eveulmiw�'o mr s wrcw w rrrem ♦ Immr m me No" mmmm eun r >1 ------------------------------'^----'_••------' ---'----'-----------'-'-'--^ '--- ----•--._._�.......----'--------- I nrrrrrmrsmeMmnmma OO >• rm. ar ..rreeemrr .^. I Ig mverinwremauewlife C ♦ 4 1 MOM"�wmm ara■ ® veoer * w N.0 m rmsm� 1 m v.emmwrnoR���r�1 Jr I m do alm m wm�n a n y m, ma aernovama�+nmmua •u. i !emlewemrwmmrm �_ 1 ®1r1+ppK��iRwow�rrr'ge0'r�"ismir Ym eem6 M rrM Rr rrlrl/r1f Q - e 1l1 f-f emmM mmr Omrlr 9 M rrmmrmlermmMlm I rar er mom i R ®oiaimi°"aravm i emla rrw t I wrr.r«errwr"Mom f 0 � k � B VA an +rmnswr.uam. r w,rr r 1` r ON rat I rrr = :r; •` j I ® reemmerrleemom q/sAr u. 1 I �srom i L= ,r,,,• �[; I O rrerarrrmrormemrwe .-omroM rawswommrrr I !�► memo : I - I eOwnealrm/pem wets 1 FA I fa. Neu " ® WYMrIWmrra 1 --------� —�� • i I NI ® Lows OEM - nrr I ® iwrmsiMenmiirwfell�mmlurem .-- € - rrmmrrmc � ' r I 1 ,E`• _ _ l e I � wh�'mcrfr~mAOiirmv�ei�� r L_-_--- _ -J 1m�.umwrM .imwm'tnrr r I mNflu mr+rmlrrmt I I ®nrwomrmrrremuc � II 1 ® orrlweaa U }.—ucsrwmum •`� rerrma I - Mo d aamrommuNwl H �I I � I I ® ./�f.tmarmgrm arorc umcm I I I 6 almrrrtpleel w"m1�I mmr U I ADULT DAY SERMS BULOWG i ! ® NOImOIL ' + I 1 ewrmw 1 ® r mmrmwm�r -� wom r ------ ! ® warmwrw m r I jrii w M� I emwrs Iall- i w►rsrw I - "ma in LL L J rar.rr4e� - O nremrr �� y -� H7 rrrr"`irCr r�r°mmwn°e' �iu�mw'°r own an sw em>•e� r uremre -•�_ r of ow w rr[mrrrmrmrc rmmv tout J KN U6M KACK CMiQMA /42-4. r a usla+m .._.. .._.._. Mom_.. .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._. _.._.._.. .awm+ar�—.. lE6aL�$. er w: sw FM _ Sre11 MN 0�tl�fcum warm JF am Irerr vnereerra INDIANAPOLIS AWMJE � SITE PLAN e4WmIA110 �Sl — — — — — — — — emrr. A-1.0 Attachment No. 3 Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to issuance of building permits for the project,the applicant shall submit a construction plan demonstrating that all construction staging areas are located as far as possible from residential areas in order to minimize noise impacts. 2. Comprehensive documentation of the project site, as it currently exists, shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of any building,grading, and/or demolition permits. The documentation shall be in accordance with the standards established by the Historical American Buildings Survey/Historical American Engineering Records (NABS/HAER). The report shall be archivally maintained with provisions for public access.The costs associated with preparation and maintenance of the documentation shall be the responsibility of the applicant. Additionally, a biography of the Holtz family history shall be archived in conjunction with the aforementioned documentation. 3. Prior to the approval or issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building permits, all facets of the project related to historic preservation shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. Conditions of Approval 1. During construction,the applicant shall: a. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in all areas where vehicles travel to keep damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; b.Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; c.Use low sulfur fuel (.05%)by weight for construction equipment; d.Attempt to phase and schedule construction activities to.avoid high ozone days (first stage smog alerts); e.Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 2. The Developer shall install a new 6"sewer lateral (min.). 3. The Developer shall install a new 7 ft. wide catch basin on Indianapolis Ave.The size of lateral and exact location of the catch basin shall be determined by the developer's engineer. 4. Prior to issuance of demolition or grading permits existing mature trees that are to be removed must be replaced at a 2 for 1 ratio with a 36"box tree or palm equivalent.Applicant shall provide an Arborist,report on all the existing trees. Said report shall quantify, identify, size and analyze the health of the existing trees. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain (if any) shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk 5. The installation of required landscape and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection and occupancy. All landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of record in written form to the City Landscape Architect prior to final inspection and occupancy. 6. A separate water meter and backflow prevention device shall be provided for the irrigation system. 7. The Water Ordinance #14.52,the "Water Efficient Landscape Requirements" apply for projects with 2500 square feet of landscaping and larger. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 20 11/19/97 c,ware-��oc 8. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and specifications. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits,modify project plans to open the stairwell (North elevation) to enhance safety for guests and employees. 10. Prior to issuance of building permits, modify project plans to show automatic sprinkler systems will be installed throughout to.comply with Huntington Beach Fire.Department and Uniform Building Code Standards. Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. 11.Prior to issuance of building permits,modify project plans to show a fire alarm system will be installed to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Department and Uniform Fire Code Standards.Shop drawings will be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation.The system will provide the following: Manual Pulls,Water flow,valve tamper and trouble detection,Audible Alarms,24 hour supervision,Smoke Detectors. 12. Prior to issuance of building permits,modify project plans to show fire extinguishers will be installed and located in areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code Standards. 13. Prior to issuance of building permits, modify project plans to show 1 fire hydrant will be installed prior to combustible construction. Shop drawings will be submitted to the Public Works Department and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. 14. Prior to issuance of building permits, modify project plans to show elevators will be sized to accommodate an ambulance gurney.Minimum 6'8"wide by 4'3"deep with minimum of 42"opening. 15. Prior to issuance of building permits, modify project plans to show address numbers will be installed to comply with City Specification#428.The number for the building will be sized a minimum of six (6) inches with a brush stroke of one and one-half 0-1/2) inches. 16. Prior to issuance of building permits, modify project plans to show exit signs and exit path markings will be provided in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. 17. Prior to issuance of building permits,modify project plans to show the project will comply with all provisions of the Huntington Beach Fire Code and City Specification #422 and #431 for the abandonment of oil wells and site restoration. 18. Prior to issuance of building permits,modify project plans to show the project will comply with all provisions of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Title 17.04.085 and City Specification #429 for new construction within the methane gas overlay districts. 19. Prior to issuance of grading permits,in accordance with NPDES requirements,a"Water Quality Management Plan" shall be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer. 20.Prior to issuance of building permits: a) A Street Improvement Plan,prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. b) A Landscape and Irrigation Plan, prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval by the Community Development Department and the Park,Tree and Landscape Division. c) A Striping Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. d) A traffic signal modification plan shall be submitted per Public Works guidelines for traffic signal construction. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 21 11/19/97 GAWOLYMMOR-UMC 5.a e) A street light installation plan shall be submitted per Public Works guidelines for installation of street lights, Standard Plan No.411. f) A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted with the building permit application. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials .to provide detailed recommendations regarding: grading, foundations, retaining walls, streets, utilities, and chemical and fill properties.of underground.items including buried pipe and concrete and.the protection thereof. 21. Prior to final inspection or certificate of occupancy: a) Remove the existing AC berm and AC sidewalk on Indianapolis Ave.and Bushard St. b) Construct new curb,gutter and sidewalk on Indianapolis Ave.and Bushard St. c) Relocate the existing traffic signal at the comer of Indianapolis Ave. and Bushard St. to Public Works requirements. d) Construct a 35 ft.radius curb return at the comer of Indianapolis Ave.and Bushard St. e) Construct a wheel chair ramp at the comer of Indianapolis Ave.and Bushard St. f) The sidewalk width on both Indianapolis Ave.and Bushard St.shall be 5.00 ft. g) Install street lights per Public Works Standards. h) All existing overhead utilities on the Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue frontage shall be undergrounded. i) Remove the existing driveway on Bushard St.and construct curb,gutter and sidewalk. j) The two proposed driveways on Indianapolis Ave. and Bushard St. shall be 27 ft. min. width and constructed per Public Works Standards. (radius type) k) Street dedication on Bushard St.shall establish a 40 ft.half street with a 27 ft.properly line radius at the comer of Indianapolis Ave.and Bushard St. 1) The developer shall submit a composite utility plan, showing water system improvements and all other underground utilities (existing and proposed) to each structure.The plan shall include driveway locations and identify irrigation areas,including stationed service connections for water and sewer to each building,public and private fire hydrants,valves, and other appurtenances in accordance with applicable Uniform Plumbing Code, City Ordinances, Public Works Standards and Water Division Design Criteria. This plan shall be approved by the Public Works Water Division prior to any construction. m) Backflow protection is required and shall be installed per the Huntington Beach Water Division Standard Plans for irrigation and fire suppression water services.All backflow devices shall be painted to match surrounding aesthetics, and be screened from view to the satisfaction of the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department, Landscape Architect and Water Division. The markings indicating the size,model number and serial number shall be affixed to the body of the backflow device and must remain visible after painting. n) Size the new domestic water meter and service per the Uniform Plumbing Code. The developer shall submit water system calculations to ensure proper water meter and water main sizes no later than the first plan check submittal. o) Abandon any existing water services to the main. Tap all new water services (domestic,landscaping, and fire protection from the 12'main in Bushard St. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 22 11/19/97 O1W0(tESEMOR-I.DOC � a' p) Irrigation will require a separate service, meter, and backflow device. The developer shall submit irrigation demands to ensure proper irrigation service sizing. q) Any fire protection equipment required by the Fire Department shall not utilize domestic or landscaping services or meters. Water use by all fire protection equipment shall be metered. Any fire service lines will require an above grade double detector check screened from the public view. 22..Provide building analysis on plans to show compliance to UBC chapter: . • 3—Occupancy Requirement • 5—Allowable Area 23. Prior to submittal for building permits,the following shall be completed; a) Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on the cover page of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing). b) The site plan shall indicate the following: 1) Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to back flow devices and Edison transforms. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method as approved by the Community Development Director. 2) Parking lot striping shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 24,California Administrative Code. 3) If outdoor lighting is included, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps or similar energy savings lamps shall be used.All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent"spillage"onto adjacent properties. c) Elevations shall indicate color and building materials proposed. d) The structures on the subject property,whether attached or detached,shall be constructed in compliance with file State acoustical standards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the property.Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an acoustical analysis report,prepared under the supervision of a person experienced in the field of acoustical engineering,with the application for building permit(s). e) All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from any view. Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors.If screening is not designed specifically into the building,a rooftop mechanical equipment plan showing screening must be submitted for review and approval with the application for building permit(s). 24.Prior to issuance of grading permits,the following shall be completed: a) A grading plan,prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer,shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. b) Wall plans shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Double walls shall be prohibited. Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls next to the new walls,and shall include necessary homeowner's approval. c) A plan for site control for all water runoff from the property during construction and initial operation of the project may be required if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. d) All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 23 11/19/97 Q%WOLPELSM0R-1J= �.o e) Traffic impact Fees shall be paid at the time of final inspection or Certificate of Occupancy. f) A Public Works construction permit shall be required for all work within the right-of-way. g) A Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued by the Department of Community Development. h) The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code,Building Division,and Fire Department as well as applicable local,State and Federal Codes;Ordinances,and standards. i) The development shall comply with all applicable provisions and requirements of the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act. j) Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. k) The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $38.00 for the posting of the Notice of Exemption/ Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Department of Community Development within two (2) days of the Planning Commission's action. Environmental Assessment No.97-18 24 11/19/97 CKWOL EWRAnx 5.P-1 ATTACHMENT 10 DATE: December 20, 1997 TO: Peter Vanek Environmental BoardLiaison FROM: City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment No. 97-18;Adult Day Services of Orange County The City of Huntington Beach.Environmental Board (Board) discussed the subject Environmental Assessment at its December I i, 1997 regular meeting. The project consists of the construction of a 20,000 sq. ft. structure on a 1 acre site in a RL-7 Low Density Residential zone, and establishment of adult day care services for up to 100 persons. Upon discussing Environmental Assessment 97-18, the Environmental Board had some concerns with the information presented in the document. The Board concurs that a Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of CEQA review for the project, however, it-was difficult for the Board to make this finding by reviewing the information presented. The Board believes that a response to the following would make the analysis more consistent with CEQA requirements. 1. On page 6, the EA indicates that the proposed use was previously deleted as a conditionally- permitted use within residential districts, and now the applicant proposes to restore this use to the code by requesting a text amendment. The EA concludes that the proposed project is not anticipated to be incompatible with surrounding residential uses. The Board found this analysis to be incomplete. The Board recommends that the reviewer would benefit from a discussion of specific reasons why this use is compatible with surrounding uses, particularly in light of the fact r that the use was specifically deleted as a conditional use. What zone is this use allowed within? The Board believes that the requested zoning text amendment warrants a more thorough analysis of compatibility with adjacent uses. 2. Under Transportation/Circulation, page 10,. it is concluded that 34 parking spaces are proposed. This does not seem: compatible for an RL-7 zone. Also, the 296 daily trips associated with the facility are substantially more than 7 residential units would generate. This raises again the issue of whether this use is consistent within and RL-7 zone. The Board did note, however, that the site's corner. location minimizes traffic impact on the surrounding residential neighborhoods. {o. o 3. Under Biological Resources, page 11,the Board believes the EA should at a minimum identity the number and kind of mature trees that may be impacted by the project. This would allow the reviewer better evaluate the overall effects-of the project. 4. With respect to Cultural Resources.on page 14, the Board found that there are two aspects of this .analysis that. are incomplete and warrant.further analysis or inFormation. First, the EA indicates that the house and barn currently located on' the property are on the list of local landmarks of importance to the community, but not the National Register of Mstoric Places. An' important bit of information that should have been included is whether the site is "eligible" for listing on the National Register. The eligibility process is an important consideration in the determination of whether removal is a significant impact and is usually accompanied by an analysis of alternatives to removal. If eligibility (or ineligibility) had already been determined, then it should have been included in the discussion. Second, the Board believes the EA should have identified the reasons that the HRB determined that the removal of structures will not result in a significant impact. We arc not necessarily refuting the HRB's finding, rather, the suggestion is meant to improve CEQA compliance. Also, because the EA does not substantiate the HRB's conclusion concerning the significance of the structures, there is no basis to determine the whether documentation, as provided in mitigation measure#2, is adequate. Please call if there arc any questions concerning these comments. Sincerely, Thomas C.Ryan, Chairperson Environmental Assessment No. 97-18 Evaluation Committee I b• NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO.97-18 Res2gnse to Environmental Board Letter dated 12/20/1997 1. PWjgct Compatibility-General Day Care uses are considered public-semipublic uses and are currently permitted, subject to approval of a conditional use permit,in multiple family residential zones,commercial,industrial and public-semipublic zoning districts. They are not allowed within the RL(Low Density Residential)zoning district. Prior to the adoption of the current ZSO,general day care uses were consider Unclassified uses and were permitted within single family residential zones subject to approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission). The subject land use was not included in the permitted or conditionally permitted land use matrix for single family residential districts when the previous Ordinance Code was updated in 1994 due to concerns relating to potential impacts of general day care uses on residential uses. The subject zoning text amendment proposes to introduce general day care uses within single family residential zones. Staff believes that the request should be supported,but on a limited basis,subject to property development criteria and review and approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission. The proposal,as modified will be consistent with General Plan goals objectives and policies which encourage land use diversity and advocate development of institutional uses within all residential areas when such uses are designed and developed so as to convey the character of residential structures. Potential General Day Care project sites are required to front on arterial streets. The project location restriction minimizes impacts to local streets and residential"core"areas by placing General Day Care development proposals adjacent to arterials which typically constitute and act as"edges"to residential enclaves. The scale of the proposed development will be limited and will be compatible with residential development by virtue of parcel area restrictions(1.0 acre)and application of RL(Residential Low Density)development standards. 2. Transnortation/Circulation-A traffic impact analysis for the proposed project was prepared by Steven-Garland Associates and estimated that the facility will generate 296 daily trips. The study analyzed the impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding street system and determined that the addition of traffic associated with the project will not have a significant impact on the roadway system and will allow all roadway segments affected by the additional traffic to operate within acceptable levels of service. A parking utilization survey was conducted on the existing adult day care center operated by ADSOC in Costa Mesa. The survey concluded that the parking demand for the existing 50 client facility was for 16 vehicles and projected that parking for 32 vehicles would be necessary to be provided at the new 100 client facility based on the number of participants. The proposed development plan provides 34 parking spaces and meets ZSO parking requirements for General Day Care uses based on a parking ratio of one parking space per staff member plus one per classroom. The proposed facility is not anticipated to impact existing parking conditions in the surrounding areas. The parking areas are concentrated along the rear and interior side property line perimeter and will be screened from northerly and westerly adjacent residential areas be a 6 ft.high wall and 7 ft.wide landscaping buffer. 3. Biological Resources-Development of the site is subject to a condition that requires submittal of an arborist report. Said report shall quantify,identify,size and analyze the health of the existing trees on the project site. The report shall also recommend how the existing trees that are to remain(if any)shall be protected and how far construction/grading shall be kept from the trunk. Existing mature trees that are to be removed shall be replaced at a 2:1 ratio with a 36"box tree or palm equivalent. There are currently approximately 30 trees on the project site. 4. Cultural Resources-The subject proposal was presented and was endorsed by the Historic Resources Board. The site was previously evaluated for its cultural and historic significance and was designated as a local landmark in the General Plan due to its social significance,however,due to lack of historic significance the site was not considered"eligible"for listing in the National Register. RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Community Development SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO.97-3, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 97-3 & NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 97-18 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 2, 1998 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Attached Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED FOTT4 BDED Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) ( ) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM: Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use II� PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a I PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE party to or interested in the below PUBLIC HEA OF BEFORE THE entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY the HUNTINCTON BEACH INDEPENDENT, a HUNT NGTON the newspaper of general circulation printed NOTICE IS HEREBY b GIVEN that on.Monday, March 2, 1998,-at 7:00 PM and published in the City of Huntington in the City Council Cham- inspection grid comment Beach, County of Orange, State of bars;i ton Main Street, by contacting ment De- Huntington Beach, the City munity Development De- Council will hold a public partment, or by telephon- and that attached Notice is a hearing on the following, ing(7FI 53A cop California, item: ON FILE: A copy of the true and complete copy as was printed 1.ZONING TEXT AMEND- proposed request is on file MENT NO:97.3;Applicant; in the Community Develop- and published in the Huntington Beach Marko B Request: menu Department, 20 To permit ""Ge General Day Main Street, Huntington Care" uses within the RL Beach, California 92648, and Fountain Valle issues of said (Low Density Residential) for inspection by the pub- District.Location:City Wide lic. A copy of the staff re- newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: Project Planner:Amy Wolfe port will be available to in- 2. ZONING MAP AMEND- terested parties at City Hall MENT NO. 97-3; Applicant: or the Main City Library City of Huntington Beach (7111 Talbert Avenue) after Request: A zone.change February 26,1998. Februar 19, 1998 for-the property located at ALL INTERESTED PER- y 20471 Bushard Street from SONS are invited to attend CG..(General Commercial) said hearing and express to RL Low Density Residen- opinions or submit evi- tial).Location:20471 Bush- dence• for or against the and Street (northwest cor- application as outlined ner of Bushard Street and above. If you challenge the Indianapolis Avenue). City Council's action In Pro1'ect Planner:Amy Wolfe court, you may be limited NOTICE IS HEREBY to raising only those issues declare under penalty of perjury, that GIVEN tssessitial forte you *a someone else , , mental assessments for the raised'at the public hearing the foregoing is true and correct. above items' were pro- described in this notice, or cessed and completed in in written correspondence accordance with the Cali- delivered to the City at, or fornia Quality Act. It was prior to,the public hearing. determined that Item #1 & If there are any further #2; with mitigation, would questions please. call the not have any significant en- Planning Division at 536- Executed on February 19 , 1998 vironmental effects and 5271 and refer to the that a mitigated negative above item. Oirect your at Costa Mesa, California. declaration is warranted. written communications to Prior to acting on the ap- the City Clerk. peal,the City Council must Connie Brockway, review and act on the neg. City Clerk ative•declaration.These en- City of Huntington vironmental assessments are on file at the City of Beach, 2000 Main Huntington Beach Com• Street, 2nd Floor, Hun- ownity... Development De- tington Beach, Call partment,2000 Main Street, fornia 92648, (714) , and are av_ailabig.for public- •,5.36.5227. __._. i Signature PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. County of Orange ) I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the below entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of I PUSUC NOTICE the HUNTINGTON BEACH INDEPENDENT a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FORE THE newspaper of general circulation, printed CITY BE and published in the City of Huntington THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Beach County of Orange State of NOTICE IS HEREBY � , GIVEN that on Monday, California, in the CityCoand that attached Notice is a March CCo atuncill C 00 PM City inspection and comment bers, 2000 Main Street; by contacting the Com- true and complete copy as was printed Huntington Beach,the City munity Development and published in the Huntington Beach hearing De- Council will hold a public ing(714) 3 2 telephon- hearing on the following ing(7t4)536.5271. item: ON FILE: A copy of the and Fountain Valley issues of said 1. ZONING TEXT AMEND- proposed request is on file MENT NO. 97.3; Applicant; in the Community Develop- newspaper to wit the issue(s) of: Marko E. Botich Request: ment Department, 2000 To permit "General Day Main Street,. Huntington Care" uses within the RL Beach, California 92648, (Low Density Residential) for inspection by the pub- District.Location:City Wide lic. A copy of the staff re- Project Planner:Amy Wolfe port will be available to In- February 2. ZONING MAP AMEND- terested parties at City Hall MENT NO. 97-3; Applicant: or the Main City Library City of Huntington Beach (7111 Talbert Avenue) after Request: A zone change February 26,1998. for the property located at ALL INTERESTED PER. 20471 Bushard Street from SONS are Invited to attend CG (General Commercial) said hearing and express to RL Low Density Redden- opinions or submit evl.. tlal).Location:20471 Bush- dence for or against the and Street (northwest cor- application as outlined I declare, under penalty of perjury, that ner of Bushard Street and above.If you challenge the Indianapolis Avenue). I City Council's action in the foregoing is true and correct. Project Planner:Amy Wolfe court, you may be limited NOTICE IS HEREBY to raising only those issues GIVEN that Initial envlron-- you or someone else mental assessments for the raised at the public hearing above items were pro- described In this notice, or ceased and completed In in written correspondence Executed on February 19 , 1998 accordance with the Cali- delivered to the City at, or fornia Quality Act. It was prior to,the public hearing. at Costa Mesa, California. determined that Item.#1 & If there are any further #2, with mitigation, would- questions please call the not have any significant en- Planning Division at 536- vironmental effects and 5271 and refer to the that a mitigated negative above item. Direct your declaration is warranted. written communications to Prior to acting on the ap- the City Clerk. peal,the City Council must Connie ;Brockway, review and act on the neg- City Clerk alive declaration.These on- City- of Huntington are onentafilel at the sCitynof Beach, 2000 Main 0-,Z Huntington each Co m- Street, 2nd Floor, Hun- muni Developpment ItIngton Beach, Cali- Signature partment,.2000MainStreet;''fornla 92848, (714) and are available for public 536.5227. ZoningText Amendment No. ZoningMapAmendment No. Negative Declaration 97- 18 -1- , '!1'1 'H �O Alta 9NIlNQH Introduction ♦ Applicant for ZTA 93-3 (Marco E. • Botich) has requested approvals for establishment of adult day care facility at 20471 Bushard Street. ♦ Site currently occupied by single family residence. • -2- Introduction (cont.) ♦ A conditional use permit has been • conditionally approved by the Planning Commission pending approval of ZTA and ZMA by the City Council. If these two requests (ZTA 93-3/ZMA 93-3) are approved they will allow • development of the site with general day care uses -3- Project Description/ZTA No. 97-3 ♦ To change zoning code to allow "General � Day Care" uses within RL Zoning Districts (Low Density Residential). • General Day Care/ZSO Definition ♦ "Provision of non-medical care for 13 or • more persons on less than 24 hour basis." Uses include: ❖Nursery schools ❖ Pre-schools ❖ Day Care Centers (children) � ❖ Day Care Centers (adults) General Day Care Code History ♦ Prior to 1994 Ordinance Code update: � ❖ Unclassified Use *:• Permitted in all residential and commercial zoning districts subject to CUP approval by Planning Commission • -6- General Day Care Code History (cont.) : • After 1994 Zoning/Subdivision Ordinance adoption: :• Public - semi-public use ❖ Permitted in: -=Multi-family Residential Zoning � Districts (ZA - CUP) =:-Commercial Zoning Districts (CUP) General Day are Code History (cont.) : • ♦ Permitted in: ❖ Industrial Zoning Districts (CUP) Public - Semi-public (CUP) • -8- Project Description/ZMA No. 97-3 ♦ Rezone 1 .03 acre site on northwest corner • of Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue from-, CG-FP2 (Gen. Comm. - Fl. Plain 2) to RL-FP2 (Low Density Res. - Fl. Plain 2 • -9- ZMA No. 97-3 ♦ Rezone would bring non-conforming � zoning on property into conformance with existing General Plan land use designation of RL (Residential Low Density) _10- Recommendation/ZTA No. 97-3 ♦ Permit general day care uses within RL � Zoning Districts subject to the following: ❖ CUP approval by Planning Commission �:• Site must be at least one gross acre in size �:• Site must be located on an arterial � highway Recommendation/ZMA No. 97-3 ♦ Staff recommends the City Council approve Zoning Map Amendment No. � 97-3 and Negative Declaration No. 97- 18 based on: ❖ Consistency with residential low density (RL) General Plan Land Use Designation 0 ❖ Consistency with uses and zoning and land use designation in immediate area -12- • i (G:admin/030397aw) -13- Connie Brockway,City Ci Clerk City of Huntington Beach 104, U.S.Pe:�1M;c w Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 HMETER 555:i:3 *a 24. 151 2131 JACK TERRY&MARCIE LEMBERG p ® 9422 COASTLAND DR (/ HUNTINGTON BEACH CA92646-47 URN RETURN —•g— F NTH tt► SENDER r W Q LEA -(vI?0 HEARING .. it I I i II III I III � ! ! i''� �"} • e:--tea+--• _..:--N•.:.--.•:�:*�r�r.�:.; '�'��+ .,�4`?.� , ,,,, , , t„ „ ,,, „ , e Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach r ¢ �\ O T°N E� U.S.POSIAGE k Office of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 �" � FE82�'93 �, % `� o tl„L 9 � .R Huntington Beach,CA 92648 4, s H METER 5 5 S 2;3� 25. 15 MA R S RICqMDI PO BOX 6131 Z. N ��INiTp NGTO -BE/ACH CA 92615-61 J +, HU � v �� '� '�•:�;:::� `�o ?ETURN T - - - - --- - - -- RETURN- �_� -�- • � �� yj,a(9s NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, March 2, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO.97-3: Applicant: Marko E. Botich west: To permit "General Day Care"uses within the RL(Low Density Residential)District. Location: City Wide Project Planner: Amy Wolfe 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.97-3: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: A zone change for the property located at 20471 Bushard Street from CG(General Commercial)to RL(Low Density Residential). Location: 20471 Bushard street(northwest comer of Bushard . Street and Indianapolis Avenue). Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item#`f',-Vith mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal,the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 (g:1cga1s:counci1:98CC3022) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,March 2, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO,97-2(CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHI: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach RRe uest: A zone change for the subject property from CG (General Commercial)and RA(Residential Agriculture)to PS(Public-Semi Public). Location: 20112 Magnolia Street(east side of Magnolia Street between Adams Avenue and Mediterranean Drive Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment(Negative Declaration No. 97-2) for the above item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the above item would not have any significant environmental effects and that a negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the project,the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. N FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 J (714) 536-5227 I I I (g:lega1s:cound1:98CC0302) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTMGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,March 2, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: V1. ZO MG TEXT AMENDMENT NO,97-3: Applicant: Marko E. Botich Request: To permit "General Day Care"uses within the RL(Low Density Residential)District. Location: City Wide Project Planner: Amy Wolfe 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.97-3: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: A zone change for the property located at 20471 Bushard Street from CG(General Commercial)to RL(Low Density Residential). Location: 20471 Bushard street(northwest corner of Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue). Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item#/�,+ith mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal,the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714) 536-5227 (g:1cga1s:counci1:98CC3022) r,� � �V S- 4�70 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,March 2, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO,97-3: Applicant: Marko E.Botich Request: To permit "General Day Care"uses within the RL(Low Density Residential)District. Location: City Wide Project Planner: Amy Wolfe; and ZONING MAP AMENDMENT No.97-3: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach ReQuest: A zone change for the property located at 20471 Bushard Street from CG(General Commercial)to RL(Low Density Residential). Location: 20471 Bushard street(northwest corner of Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue). Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment(Negative Declaration No. 97- 18)for the above items was processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the above items,with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. This environmental assessment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUM)NG50%MACH TO: Office of the City Clerk FROM: Amy Wolfe,Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Mailing List for ZMA 97-3 and ZTA 97-3 DATE: February 18, 1998 This memo is intended to clarify that the Planning Division has verified property ownership information against the most recent tax rolls for properties within 300 ft of the project site. If you have any questions please me at X5075 cc: Mary Beth Broeren, Senior Planner MF:aw 300' OWNER LIST Prepared By Cathy McDermott ADDlicant/Remesentative: Site: 20471 Bushard St. Ownership Listing Service APN 151 21317 500.4 '6 Upper Newport Plaza List Current to 4197 Newport Beach CA 92660 Metro Scan 1. 151 211 37 2. 151 211 38 3. 151 211 39 SISTERS OF THE HOLY NAMES LOUIS VANSMAALEN&RENEE HE:;.=< OTTO BURKHARDT PO BOX 907 20422 ANCHOR CIR 20442 ANCHOR CIR LOS GATOS CA 95031.0907 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47ml HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 4. 15121140 5. 151 211 41 8. 151 211 42 LOIS KINDER FRANCIS GENE RAPP - MICHAEL&MARGARET HIGGINS 20441 TIDELAND LN 20421 TIDELAND LN 20411 BLUFFWATER CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264"7 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264647 7. 161 211 43 8. 151 211 44 :•9. 151-212 03 HUGH QUIST JR. ERNEST CALKIN :}TEH &CHIA UANG 9392 CLIFFWOOD DR 9382 CLIFFWOOD DR - 20372 TIDELAND LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92640 47A, x `HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 { 10. 151 212 04 11. 151 212 05 ` 12. 151212 06 VERNON &DEBBIE PIPES JON&CAROL HOWERTON 's SMICHAEL HIGGINS 20392 TIDELAND LN 10461 COOK CIR t s 20411 BLUFFWATER CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92546-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 82648=30�$, 'HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 13. 151 212 07 14. 151 212 08 `15. 151 21211 RICHARD&GAYLE SWANSON DALE ANDERSON MARK&LAURA TRAVIS PETERSO 20391 BLUFFWATER CIR 20361 BLUFFWATER CIR - 20382 BLUFFWATER CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.47 -� HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92846-47 1& 151 21212 17. 15121213 18. 151 213 06 ANDY HILDEBRANT PHILLIP&SHERYL-STRANAHAN .LAREK&LOUISE FEDERMANN 20392 BLUFFWATER CIR 210412 BLUFFWATER: 7. 9372 CLOUDHAVEN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646A THUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 19. 151 213 07 20. 151 213 08 ` }21. 151 213 09 CHUN-MING &LIERH SY SCOTT BEARDSHEAR&ALANE PI $} ;'`SANDRA HESS BARNES 3 STILLWATER 9392 CLOUDHAVEN DR . 9402 CLOUDHAVEN OR IRVINE CA 92612-3426 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 "': HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47.47 1310 23. 151 21311 24. 151 21312 BRUCE BIN4.�--�w""'"" DONALD WAGONER JACK TERRY&MARCIE LEMBERG 9412 CLOW N DR 20452 TIDELAND LN ,, f. 9422 COASTLAND DR HU ON B CA 92645-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646=4V-.,�:- HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 25. 15121313 28. 15121314 4 27. 15121315 MARIO&ROSA RICCARDI EDWARD MOOERS JR. DAVOOD MINOOFAR PO BOX 6131 9442 COASTLAND DR Y `9452 COASTLAND DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92615-61 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 47?" HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-47 i Z•!h(-�97-3 �05 �� �o�,�Q aF t.s�. 28. 151 21316 29. 15121317 ry30. 151 251 12 OSCAR BLACHE JR. &LUSTEREN ANDREW HOLTZ -. FAYE METZ 9472 COASTIAND DR °',34302 STARBOARD LANTERN `, x9531 CAITHNESS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 DANA POINT CA 92629.2868 R, 'HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-60 31. 151 251 13 32. 151251 1433. 151 25115 SAKCHAI&PIMPAR THANAWIWAT PERRY BRIDGES w 'PALMINA HAYES 9521 CAITHNESS DR 9511 CAITHNESS DR 20521>PAI8LEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-60 : HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264W 4 j_, _HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-80 34. 161 251 16 35. 151251 17 '-36. 151 413 24 HENRY&KATHRYN GOLDMAN JEN-TEH&MEI-CHIU LIU #,- -JOHNNY MOSHAM 20531 PAISLEY LN 20471 ALISA LN. �s x,;0532 BAY MEADOW DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-60 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 37. 151 413 25 38. 151 413 26 939 151 413 27 RUBEN BAGHDASSARIAN L LAM&BICH NGOC TRAN ICI RSEY 4024 MISTRAL DR 20442 CASTLE ROCK CIR 20452 CASTL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-21 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-53 ` HUNTINGT C A 2 6-53 40. 151 413 28 .41. 151 413 29 -42, 151 413 30 MARVIN NELSEN MICHAEL BURKE JEFFREY&CATHERINE BECK 20462 CASTLE ROCK CIR 20472 CASTLE ROCK CIR =:g =`20492 CASTLE ROCK CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.53 HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA 92646,, HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 43. 151 413 31 44. 151413 32 413 33 GEORGE&DELPHINE NAFF ETTORE'&GLADYS CAPONERA n TIMOTHY SHARP JAY&KARI CA 20491 CASTLE ROCK CIR 20471-CASTLE ROCK CIR - � 1 20461 CASTLE ROCK CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINGTON BEACKCA 92646 53 CtHUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 i _ 4rx 46. 151 413 34 47, 151 413 35 _ ,4 48. 151 413 36 JESSE GOMEZ JR. JAMES CONLEY r y t MEIJIN NAKAYAMA 20451 CASTLE ROCK CIR 20441 CASTLE ROCK CIR = = 12068 MORROW DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53',, TUSTIN CA 92782-1260 . : 49. 151 413 37 50. 151 421 03 -x =T51. 151 421 06 BETTY ODHNER SCHOOL HUNTINGTON BEACH CI _ ARTHUR&LINDA BOVE 20411 CASTLE ROCK CIR PO BOX 71 20501 COHASSET LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648-00 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 52. 151 421 07 53. 151 421 06 54. 151 422 01 JOHN &CHERYL LANGDON DOE&HSIANG CHEN 5'LUKOSE&SALEENA THACHET 20521 COHASSET LN 20531 COHASSET LN = 20502 COHASSET LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.59 55. 151 422 02 58.151422 03 57. 151422 04 TELU WU DAVID&FUMEI LIANG. ' KIOUMARB&GUITY EZZATI 20522 COHASSET LN `;-20532 COHASSET LN 414 POINT LOMA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264"9":- =CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625-1028 z T A 4 7-3 .dG�.�6Cs,� .zmA q1-3 7r a- 58. 151 422 07 59. 151 422 08 W. 151.422 09 DAVID&STACY KAPLAN JON &LINDA RAE TURNER FRANK&JOANNE ARCHULETA 20541 MONTAUK CIR 20531 MONTAUK CIR 20521 MONTAUK CIR - HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 61. 151 42210 62. 151 42310 63. 151 42311 NAN WARREN ROBERTA EICHENLAUB HOWARD&RUBY NORTON 20501 MONTAUK CIR 20542 MONTAUK CIR 27142 CONNEMARA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675 64. 151 42312 65. 151 42313 Records Processed - 65 DAVID ELLIOTT STANLEY&SUSAN ZWIERZYNSKI'` Dupe screened - 0 20522 MONTAUK CIR 20502 MONTAUK CIR CRs Screened - 0 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 Bad addressess - 0 Labels produced - 65 r, T Pr 4 7-3 ewe. z mA 4-?-a .col if `�3 151 213 10 BRUCE STUEBING 3 SORA COURT ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 151 213 12 TROTSKY, JACK TERRY P.O.BOX 6322 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615 151 413 26 LAM,L.ANDRE 10221 SLATER AVE., STE. 211 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 151413 27 DONALD&MARICIA MARSEY 20452 CASTLE ROCK CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 crnwxxi 41?-3 C'.11L-u- Z (�nA 91-3 IPPUB HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS - February 9, 1998 7- President 1 Hu tington Harbor POA 10 FANS 16 H.B.Chamber of Commerce P.O. 91 Jim Xanthaki 2210 Main Street,Suite 200 Sunset Beac 90742 18586 n Street,S 200 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ngton Beach,CA 926 Judy Legan 2 William D. Holman 11 Edna Littlebury 17 Orange County Assoc.of Realtors PLC Golden St.Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. 25552 La Paz Road 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Garden Grove,CA 92642 PXBa idet 3 Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 Bolsa Chica New Urban West iety,Inc. 748 520 Broadway Ste. 100 O.Box 10926 Hunt Beach, A 92605 Santa Monica,CA 90401 to Mesa,CA 92627 A :Jane Gothold mmunity Assoc. 4 Pres.,H.B.Hist.Society 13 Cou of Orange/EMA 19 reside t C/O Newland House Museum Mich 1 M.Ruane,Dir. 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O.B 4048 h,CA 907 -0215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa A a,CA 92702-404 President 5 Chairperson 14 County of range/EMA 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Historical Resources Bd. Thomas Ma hews PO Box 865 Comm. Services Dept. P.O.Box 40 8 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 2000 Maui St. Santa Ana,C 92702 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 15 Planning Depa e t 19 BIA-OC 1 706 Orange Ave. Orange County 9 Executive Circle#100 H tington Beach,CA 92648 P.O.Box 4048 Irvine Ca 92714-6734 Santa Ana,CA 92 02-4048 X81812th 7 Jeff Metzel 16 County of Ora ge/ MA 19 Seacliff HOA Tim Miller Floor 19391 Shady bor ircle P.O.Box 40 90017 Huntington Beac A 92648 Santa Ana, A 9270 4048 E.T.I.Corral 100 8 John Roe 16 Plannins ir. 20 Mary Bell Seacliff HOA City of osta Mesa 20292 Eastwood Cir. 19382 Su le Lane P.O.B x 1200 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntingt Beach,CA 92 8 Costa. esa,CA 92628-1 00 Allen Macenski, 9 Lou M nnone 6 PI ing Dir. 21 Environmental Board Chairman Seacl' HOA C' of Fountain Valley 20021 Lawson Lane 19 1 Ocean Bluff Circle 200 Slater Ave. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 ntington Beach CA 92648 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 g:1abe1s\phn1b1s ZrN4-7.3 - /hA 47-3 -20g7/ 49i a s PU#HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST• MAILING LABELS - February 9, 1998 n ng irec or Jerry Buchanan 29 C untry w es H A i f s— tster' HB City Elementary School Dist. rald a 2 ter vd 20451 Craimer Lane S it s er A Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ti Be C 9 ec to 23 James Jones 30 ry r 38 ity e e4,Lc Ocean View Elementary a k 1 glit . School district 77 o n al eac , CA 07 17200 Pinehurst Lane i n 01 C 6 9 Huntington Beach CA 92647 California Coastal Commission 24 Ron Frazier 31 Sa 9.111 38 Theresa Henry Westminster School District M d k ea South Coast Area Office 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 516 e i le 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor Westminster CA 92683 H on 6 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 California Coastal Commission 24 Patricia Koch 32 K om ny 39 South Coast Area Office HB Union High School Disrict 4 o 1 n 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor 10251 Yorktown Avenue Ne each A 92, 6 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Jo CSA 33 i t 730 El Camino Way#200 5 Tustin,CA 92680 Director 26 Goldenwest lege 34 Local Solid Waste Enf.Agy. Attn:F ed e is O.C. Health Care Agency 57 Go en 7est t. P.O.Box 355 gt Bei ch A 26 7 Santa Ana,CA 92702 New Growth Coordinator 7 o Ha rs, e c 5 tin n B ch Post Offi d ks ept 6 P.O.Bo 4 n a ,C 67 S to j a CA 27 -40 8 Ec 23 inti gt c all 36 tair al : at ge e 1 ent L S D s 'ct 77 ger e. # 0 1 00 ee n ngt e h A 4 tair a y 08 t e D.shn 29 C i Es at CIA 37 ity lem nta S hool t. T1omas ox 1 66 Trc itter Dri e u gton ac C 926 6 H n Beach A 92648 g:1abe1s\phn1b1s ZrA q7.3 Z(KA 97-9 .26g71 B � P C HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIS70 MAILING LABELS - February 9, 1998 r - President 1 H on Harbor POA 10 FA 16 H.B.Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box I Jim Xant 2210 Main Street,Suite 200 Sunset Beach, 18586 tr uite 200 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Hu gton Beach,CA 8 Judy Legan 2 William D. Holman 11 Edna Littlebury 17 Orange County Assoc.of Realtors PLC Golden St.Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. 25552 La Paz Road 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Garden Grove,CA 92642 President Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Pa "fic Coast Archaeological 18 "gos De Bolsa Chica New Urban West Soc ty,Inc. P. . ox 3748 520 Broadway Ste. 100 P.O. ox 10926 Hunt' on Beach,C 2605 Santa Monica,CA 90401 Cost Mesa,CA 92627 Attn: ne Gothold Sunset Bea c unity Assoc. 4 Pres.,H.B.Hist.Society 13 Coun of Orange/EMA Pat Thie esiden C/O Newland House Museum Michae M. Ruane,Dir. PO B 215 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O.Box 048 S set Beach,CA 90742 215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa An CA 92702-4048 President 5 Chairperson 14 County of ange/EMA 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Historical Resources Bd. Thomas Mat ews PO Box 865 Comm.Services Dept. P.O.Box 40 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 2000 Main St. Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 1 Planning Dep ent 19 BIA-OC >jeff�Metz ve. Orange County E 9 Executive Circle#100 onch,CA 92 P.O. Box 4048 i Irvine Ca 92714-6734 Santa Ana,CA 92 2-4 48 and Spicer 7 16 County of Orange/E 19 SCA Tim Miller 818 We Floor arbor Circle P.O.Box 4048 Lo geles,CA 9001 ch,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 927 2-4 48 E.T.I.Corral 100 8 John 16 Planning Dir. 20 Mary Bell Seacliff A City of Costa M sa 20292 Eastwood Cir. 19382 Su le Lan<9264 P. O.Box 1200 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington ch,C Costa Mesa,C 92628-120 Allen Macens1d, 9 Lou Mannone16 Planning r. 1 Environmental Board Chairman SeaCliff HOA City of Fo ntain Valley 20021 Lawson Lane 19821 Oc n Bluff 10200 S ter Ave. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntin on Beach C Fountai Valley,CA 92708 i g:labels\phnlbls z f r,P- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS - February 9, 1998 P ng ecto 2 Jerry Buchanan 29 Cou View Estates HOA 7 f e tmi ter HB City Elementary School Dist. G d ChapniAn 8 es er B 20451 Craimer Lane 67 S 're C r le ins er A 9 6 3 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 H ti a nin ire to 3 James Jones 30 ryl r of S 1 B ac Ocean View Elementary e do 1 ig t. School district 71 R Bea 0 4 17200 Pinehurst Lane u tin h, 9 49 Huntington Beach CA 92647 C o a C 1 C ss 24 Ron Frazier 31 lly in 38 r Hen Westminster School District ea la kAr a ut as ea ce 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 1 Gelding ircle 00 a a , I Floo Westminster CA 92683 ntington Beach, 9 649 A 2- C a tal o on 24 Patricia Koch 32 Koll Company 39 h st ea f' a HB Union High School Disrict 4343 Von Karman 0 C eang te, 101, Floo 10251 Yorktown Avenue Newport Beach,CA 92666 ng Beach,CA 92 02-4 0 Huntington Beach,CA 92 64 6 Robert Joseph 25 CSA 33 Lester C & Jane Carlile Caltrans District 12 730 El Camino Way#200 9182 Mediterranean 2501 Pullman St. Tustin,CA 92680 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Santa Ana,CA 92705 N Goldenwest College 34 t nf. :F Owe s 3. ar y 74 olde st St. u on ea h C 9 647 2 New Growth Coordinator 27 Co n r o s,Be c 5 Huntington Beach Post Office a Pa t. 6771 Warner Ave. P. B 40 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Sa to a, A 02- 4 Marc Ecker 28 n * on each Fountain Valley . t Ro ers-La e Elementary School District 77 ing r 30 17210 Oak Street n ' on a CA 26 7 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Dr.Duane Dishno 29 u V' t s HOA HB City Elementary School Dist. a 'e mas PO Box 71 6 2 o er Dri Huntington Beach,CA 92626 un ' n Beac CA 92 8 g:1abe1s\phn1b1s �(4-7/ °'�f • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,March 2, 1998, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO,97-3: Applicant: Marko E. Botich Reaues : To permit "General Day Care"uses within the RL(Low Density Residential)District. Location: City Wide Project Planner: Amy Wolfe 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO,97-3: Applicante City of Huntington Beach Reque t: A zone change for the property located at 20471 Bushard Street from CG(General Commercial)to RL(Low Density Residential). Location: 20471 Bushard street(northwest corner of Bushard _ Street and Indianapolis Avenue). Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal,the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227. ZY ✓"l�I�� — � �''`�', � Q � � �� � cv mac+ �a�a.� Vm (g:1cga1s:cound1:98CC3022) f r,h� llitnti nnrnn esoa.-.. -- • r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,March 2, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO 97-2 (CMUST PRE CHURCH Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: A zone change for the subject property from CG (General Commercial)and RA(Residential Agriculture)to PS (Public-Semi Public). Location: 20112 Magnolia Street(east side of Magnolia Street between Adams Avenue and Mediterranean Drive Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREB�GIVEN that an initial environmental assessment for the above item was processed and completed in,accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the above item would not have any sign ficant environmental effects and that a negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the•appeal 4he City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. This environmental asses ment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,1200 ain Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community elopment Department,or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 ,a-1eoa1s-cnunci 1:98CC0302) �''� • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • �L-�ty�,Z�� /y� BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, March 2, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO,97-3: Applicant: Marko E. Botich Request: To permit "General Day Care"uses within the RL(Low Density Residential)District. Location: City Wide PrQ.ject Planner: Amy Wolfe 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO,97-3: Applicant; City of Huntington Beach Request: A zone change for the property located at 20471 Bushard Street from CG(General Commercial)to RL(Low Density Residential). Location: 20471 Bushard street(northwest corner of Bushard _ Street and Indianapolis Avenue). PrQ-ject Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item##/f,-oith mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative - declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the appeal,the City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. These environmental assessments are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227. /�J Yee -.>ot cv GraaaRr� +. � f (g:1ega1s:counci1:98CC3022) 0L7,-L . 0 k sue,® �• vlo i-6� �' /�D cS /�GCS��. r K� C— o e t�5 � � �- • tier 4 fA. hxo%hv. c• • !.APPROVED AS TO FORM:: GAIL HUTTON,: City Attorney By:. Deputy City Attorney - -t (c • i FAX FROM: 0 CONNIE BROCKWAY, CITY CLERK J J CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH • P O Box 19012000 Mai eet E9�3 Huntington Beach, A 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH (714) 536= 227 (714) 374- 557 FAX Date: Number of Pages (in ding cover page): .........><' ».- De ut Cit Clerk <' :::>::<:>::::<::::::>::::::>::: Deputy Y ... ................ Fax ................................ ................................. Remarks: Urgent For your review Reply A Please comment Per your request i/ 1 i I �I 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CLU OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,March 2, 1998, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: F1 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO,97-2 (CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHI: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: A zone change for the subject property from CG (General Commercial)and RA(Residential Agriculture)to PS(Public-Semi Public). Location: 20112 Magnolia Street(east side of Magnolia Street between Adams Avenue and Mediterranean Drive Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREB VEN that an initial environmental assessment for the above item was processed and completed in,dccoidarice with the California Quality Act. It was determined that the above item would not have/a0 sign' scant environmental effects and that a negative declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on the-�appeal he City Council must review and act on the negative declaration. This environmental�asses ment is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,200 ain Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community elopment Department, or by telephoning(714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 (g:legals:counci1:98000302) i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING• BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE s��` -03/A7 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday,March 2, 1998,at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following item: 1. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NQ,97-3: Applicant: Marko E. Botich Request: To permit "General Day Care"uses within the RL(Low Density Residential)District. Location: City Wide Project Planner: Amy Wolfe 2. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO.97-3: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Request: A zone change for the property located at 20471 Bushard Street from CG(General Commercial)to RL(Low Density Residential). Location: 20471 Bushard street(northwest corner of Bushard Street and Indianapolis Avenue). Project Planner: Amy Wolfe NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that initial environmental assessments for the above items were processed and completed in accordance with the California Quality Act. It was determined that Item#/�,+ith mitigation,would not have an significant enviro iv _ declaration is warranted. Prior to acting on ppeal,the ity Council must review and act on the y ~� negative declaration. These environmen sess{ ar6 on-fire at e City of Huntington eac Community Development Department,2 00 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at City Hall or the Main City Library(7111 Talbert Avenue)after February 26, 1998. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Division at 536-5271 and refer to the above item. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Connie Brockway, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 - —tko "v E (g:legals:council:98CC3022) CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST zoo+N� 'rc-xt P.r►�al,+u6►.9'� moo. 9"t-3 SUBJECT:zotOW w Md►t A WW WA A?'I LJO. 91-3 DEPARTMENT: C.oO VAQ O+TEA mil?- MEETING DATE: 3 'L l_ais CONTACT: W O l*E,; PHONE: 3-I S. 501 S N/A YES NO ( ) ( ) Is the notice attached? ( ) ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? ( ) ( ) ( ) Are the date,day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? ( ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? ( ) ( ) ) Is a map attached for publication? Is a larger ad required? Size Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ( ) 6A ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( )a ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,are the resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Develop t Dept.items only) Please complete the following: 1 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date f 2. Number of times to be published j 3. Number of days between publications 21 300'OWNER LIST WBt&Cat hy McDermott Applicant/Representative: Site: 20471 Bushard St. sting ServiceAPN 15121317 '6 Upper Newport Plaza List Current to 4/97 Newport Beach CA 926W Metro Scan - - 1. 151 211 37 2. 151 211 38 S. 161 211 39 SISTERS OF THE HOLY NAMES LOUIS VANSMAALEN&RENEE HE. •OTTO BURKHARDT PO BOX 907 20422 ANCHOR CIR 20442 ANCHOR CIR LOS GATOS CA 95031.0907 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 - HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264647 4. 151 211 40 5. 151 211 41 6. 161 211 42 LOIS KINDER FRANCIS GENE RAPP MICHAEL&MARGARET HIGGINS 20441 TIDELAND LN 20421 TIDELAND LN .20411 BLUFFWATER CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47` HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 7. 151211 43 8. 161 211 44 -.9. 151212 03 HUGH QUIST JR. ERNEST CALKIN L =TEH&CHIA LIANA 9392 CLIFFWOOD DR 9382 CLIFFWOOD DR •20372 TIDELAND LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH'CA 92646=47' = 'HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 10. 15121204 11. 15121205 02. 15121206 VERNON &DEBBIE PIPES JON &CAROL HOWERTON _ "MICHAEL HIGGINS 20392 TIDELAND LN 10461 COOK CIR 3 '20411 BLUFFWATER CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264W% -,; HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 13. 15121207 14. 15121208 15. 15121211 RICHARD&GAYLE SWANSON DALE ANDERSON MARK&LAURA TRAVIS PETERSO 20391 BLUFFWATER CIR 20381 BLUFFWATER CIR 20382 BLUFFWATER CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264"7 t HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 16. 15121212 17. 15121213 18. 151213 06 ANDY HILDEBRANT PHILLIP&SHERYL So 1ANAHAN �,LAREK&LOUISE FEDERMANN 20392 BLUFFWATER CIR 210412 BLUFFWATER` 9372 CLOUDHAVEN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 w =HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 19- 151213 07 20. 151213 08 _ 21. 151213 09 CHUN-MING&LIERH SY SCOTT BEARDSHEAR&ALANE PI 5 ?e `wSANDRA HESS BARNES 3 STILLWATER 9392 CLOUDHAVEN DR . .9402 CLOUDHAVEN DR IRVINE CA 92612-3426 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264647 "HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 4' 13 23. 151 21311 24. 15121312 BRUCE 10 BIN -�'"" """' DONALD WAGONER JACK TERRY&MARCIE LEMBERG 9412 CLO N DR 20452 TIDELAND LN = . ; 1 9422 COASTLAND DR HU ON B CA 92646-47 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 ; HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 25. 15121313 28. 151 21314 27. 15121315 MARIO&ROSA RICCARDI EDWARD MOOERS JR. _ OAVOOD MINOOFAR PO BOX 6131 9442 COASTLAND DR <9452 COASTLAND DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92615-61 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47:1- j HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.47 r t t 28. 151 21316 29. 151 21317 _ d 30. 151 251 12 OSCAR BLACHE JR. &LUSTEREN ANDREW HOLTZ # :;-FAME METZ 9472 COASTLAND DR 34302 STARBOARD LANTERN p 59531 CAITHNESS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-47 DANA POINT CA 92629-2868 ,. 'HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.60 p � - 31. 15125113 32. 151 251 14 133. 15125115 SAKCHAI &PIMPAR THANAWIWAT PERRY BRIDGES =` �k �-�PALMINA HAVES w; 9521 CAITHNESS DR 9511 CAITHNESS DR Y ; ='20521 PAISLEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264W HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 80 k _ HUNTINQTON BEACH CA 92646.60 } 34. 151 251 16 35. 151 251 17 38. 151413 24 HENRY&KATHRYN GOLDMAN JEN•TEH&MEI-CHID LIU -JOHNNY MOSHAM 20531 PAISLEY LN 20471 ALISA LN . x ,4 4,9532 BAY MEADOW DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.60 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92 64t451�_t UNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.53 37. 151413 25 38. 151 413 26 1,39 151 413 27 RUBEN BAGHDASSARIAN L LAM &BICH NQOC TRAN D IC RSEY 4024 MISTRAL DR 20442 CASTLE ROCK CIR:: ` = 20452 CAST C CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649-21 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINQTO C A,�L646.53 40. 151 413 28 . .41. 151413 29 42, 151413 30 MARVIN NELSEN MICHAEL BURKE JEFFREY&CATHERINE BECK 20462 CASTLE ROCK CIR 20472 CASTLE ROCK CIR ;20492 CASTLE ROCK CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646=53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92848-53 43. 15141331 44. 151 413 32 k` 45. 151 413 33 GEORGE&DELPHINE NAFF ETTORE&GLADYS CAPONERM TIMOTHY SHARP&JAY&KARI CA 20491 CASTLE ROCK CIR 20471-CASTLE ROCK CIR - z 20461 CASTLE ROCK CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 53 1- ' HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.53 46. 151413 34 47. 151413 35 = 48. 151 413 36 JESSE GOMEZ JR. JAMES CONLEY x MEIJIN NAKAYAMA 20451 CASTLE ROCK CIR "20441 CASTLE ROCK CIR - 12068 MORROW DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53t , Y; .TUSTIN CA 92782-1260 08 BE49. 151413 TY ODHNER SCHOOL HUNTINGTON BEACH CI ,ARTHUR&LINDA BOVE 20411 CASTLE ROCK CIR PO BOX 71 `20501 COHASSET LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-53 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648.00 a:, HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 52. 151 421 07 53. 151 421 08 54. 151 422 01 JOHN&CHERYL LANGDON DOE&HSIANG CHEN LUKOSE&SALEENA THACHET 20521 COHASSET LN 20531;COHASSET LN A•�20502 COHASSET LN HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 `.HUNTINGTON BEACH CAf92646 59 "` ; . HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264"9 55. 151422 02 56.151 422 03 . 57. 151422 04 TELU WU DAVID&FUMEI LIANG i KIOUWAS&QUITY EZZATI 20522 COHASSET LN °. 20532 COHASSET LN _ -14 POINT LOMA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUN71NOTON BEACH CA 92646.59 CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625-1026 ; �A w) 3 -bY 7t 58. 151 422 07 59. 151 422 08 60. 151 422 09 DAVID&STACY KAPLAN JON&LINDA RAE TURNER FRANK&JOANNE ARCHULETA 20541 MONTAUK CIR 20531 MONTAUK CIR 20521 MONTAUK CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-59 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.59 61. 15142210 62. 151 42310 . 63. 151 42311 NAN WARREN ROBERTA EICHENLAUB HOWARD&RUBY NORTON 20501 MONTAUK CIR 20542 MONTAUK CIR 27142 CONNEMARA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264"9 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.59 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675 64. 151 42312 65. 151 42313 Records Processed - 65 DAVID ELLIOTT STANLEY&SUSAN ZWIERZYNSIQ Dupps screened - 0 20522 MONTAUK CIR 20502 MONTAUK CIR CRs Screened - 0 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646-69 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646.59 Bad addressess - 0 Labels produced . 65 Z T Pr 9'1-3 Z h A 91--3 7! .3 151 213 10 BRUCE STUEBING 3 SORA COURT ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 151213 12 TROTSKY, JACK TERRY P.O.BOX 6322 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615 151 413 26 LAM,L. ANDRE 10221 SLATER AVE., STE. 211 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 151413 27 DONALD&MARICIA MARSEY 20452 CASTLE ROCK CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 G.AWKKI Z (+nA 17-3 -::L6q7/ �4� PU*HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST' MAILING LABELS - February 9, 1998 President 1 Hu tington Harbor POA 10 FANS 16 H.B.Chamber of Commerce P. O. 1 Jim Xanthaki 2210 Main Street,Suite 200 Sunset Beac 90742 18586 n Street,S 200 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ngton Beach,CA 926 Judy Legan 2 William D. Holman 11 Edna Littlebury 17 Orange County Assoc. of Realtors PLC Golden St.Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. 25552 La Paz Road 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Garden Grove,CA 92642 President 3 Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Pacific Coast Archaeological 18 gos De Bo1sa Chica New Urban West iety,Inc. P. Box 3748 520 Broadway Ste. 100 O.Box 10926 Huni on Beach, A 92605 Santa Monica,CA 90401 to Mesa,CA 92627 A :Jane Gothold Sunset Bea mmunity Assoc. 4 Pres.,H.B. Hist.Society 13 Cou of Orange/EMA 19 Pat Tlue esid t C/O Newland House Museum Mich 1 M.Ruane,Dir. PO B 215 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O.B 4048 Su et Beach,CA 907 -0215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa A a,CA 92702-404 President 5 Chairperson 14 County of range/EMA 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Historical Resources Bd. Thomas Ma hews PO Box 865 Comm. Services Dept. P.O.Box 40 8 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 2000 Main St. Santa Ana,C 92702 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 15 Planning Depa e t 19 BIA-OC 706 Orange Ave. Orange County 9 Executive Circle#100 H tington Beach,CA 92648 P.O.Box 4048 Irvine Ca 92714-6734 Santa Ana,CA 92 02-4048 >SCA picer 7 Jeff Metzel 16 County of Ora ge/ MA 19 Seacliff HOA Tim Miller , 12th Floor 19391 Shady bor ircle P.O.Box 40 ne CA 90017 Huntington Beac A 92648 Santa Ana, A 9270 4048 E.T.I.Corral 100 8 John Roe 16 Planning ir. 20 Mary Bell Seacliff HOA City of osta Mesa 20292 Eastwood Cir. 19382 Su le Lane P.O.B x 1200 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntingt Beach,CA 92 8 Costa esa,CA 92628-1 00 Allen Macenski, 9 Lou M. nnone 6 PI ing Dir. 21 Environmental Board Chairman Seac ' f HOA C' of Fountain Valley 20021 Lawson Lane 19 1 Ocean Bluff Circle 200 Slater Ave. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 ntington Beach CA 92648 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 g:labels\phnlbls 'e,rN 9 7-3 em- MA 47-3 -20g7/ S PL C HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLISTO' MAILING LABELS - February 9, 1998 n 'ng irec or Jerry Buchanan 29 C untry W es H A i f s ster HB City Elementary School Dist. Id a 2 ter vd 20451 Craimer Lane S i er A Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ti Be C 9 an ' g ec to 23 James Jones 30 ry r 38 ity a e c Ocean View Elementary a k 1 'ght School district 77 oc 9 n al eac ,CA 07 17200 Pinehurst Lane n 01 C 6 9 Huntington Beach CA 92647 California Coastal Commission 24 Ron Frazier 31 Sa i I m 38 Theresa Henry Westminster School District M d k ea South Coast Area Office 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 516 e i le 200 Oceangate, loth Floor Westminster CA 92683 H on , 6 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 California Coastal Commission 24 Patricia Koch 32 K om ny 1 39 South Coast Area Office HB Union High School Disrict 4 o Karr i n 200 Oceangate, loth Floor 10251 Yorktown Avenue Ne each A 9 66 Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Jo CSA 33 i ' t 730 El Camino Way#200 5 Tustin,CA 92680 Director 26 Goldenwest lege 34 Local Solid Waste Enf.Agy. Attn:F ed e is O.C.Health Care Agency 57 Go en 7est t. P.O.Box 355 gt Bei ch A 26 7 Santa Ana,CA 92702 New Growth Coordinator 7 o H rs, e c 5 tin n B9ftch Post Offi d ks ept 6 rn v . P.O.Bo 4 n a ,C 6 7 S to a CA 27 -40 8 Ec 23 F nti gt c 4a11 36 ta' al A at ge e 1 ent S D s 'ct 7 77 d' ger e. # 0 1 0 F. n gt h A 4 ta' y 08 ua e D shn 29 C i at s OA 37 ity lem nta S 1 lool t. C omas ox 1 66 Tr tter Dri e u 'ngton ac C 926 6 H n Beach A 92648 g:labels\phnlbls Z,t- A 9-13 - Zl�A 9?-s -26g7r 8 P*C HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLISO' MAILING LABELS - February 9, 1998 y - - President 1 H on Harbor POA 10 FA 16 H.B.Chamber of Commerce P.O.Box 1 Jim Xant 2210 Main Street,Suite 200 Sunset Beach, 18586 tr uite 200 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Hu on Beach,CA 8 Judy Legan 2 William D.Holman I 1 Edna Littlebury 17 Orange County Assoc.of Realtors PLC Golden St.Mob. Hm. Owners Leag. 25552 La Paz Road 23 Corporate Plaza,Suite 250 11021 Magnolia Blvd. Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Newport Beach CA 92660-7912 Garden Grove,CA 92642 President Mr.Tom Zanic 12 Pa 'fic Coast Archaeological 18 'gos De Bolsa Chica New Urban West Soc ty,Inc. P. . ox 3748 520 Broadway Ste. 100 P.O. ox 10926 Han tin on Beach,C 2605 Santa Monica,CA 90401 Cost Mesa,CA 92627 Attn: ne Gothold Sunset Beac unity Assoc. 4 Pres.,H.B.Hist.Society 13 Coun of Orange/EMA 1 Pat Thie esiden C/O Newland House Museum Michae M.Ruane,Dir. PO B 215 19820 Beach Blvd. P.O.Box 048 S set Beach,CA 90742 215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa An CA 92702-4048 President 5 Chairperson 14 County of ange/EMA 19 Huntington Beach Tomorrow Historical Resources Bd. Thomas Mat ews PO Box 865 Comm.Services Dept. P.O.Box 40CA 92702-4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 2000 Main St. Santa Ana, Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Julie Vandermost 6 Council on Aging 1 Planning Depa ent 19 BIA-OC >gtt ve. Orange County E 9 Executive Circle#100 ch,CA 92 P. Q.Box 4048 Irvine Ca 92714-6734 Santa Ana,CA 92 2-4 48 and Spicer 7 16County of Orange/E 19 SCA Tim Miller 818 We , Floor arbor Circle P.O.Box 4048 Lo geles,CA 9001 ch,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 927 2-4 48 E.T.I. Corral 100 8 Joh>onBeach 16 Planning Dir. 20 Mary Bell Sea City of Costa M sa 20292 Eastwood Cir. I9e Lane P.O.Box 1200 Huntington Beach,CA 92 64 6 Huch,CA 926 Costa Mesa,C 92628-I20 Allen Macenski, 9 Lou 16 Planning r. 1 Environmental Board Chairman Sea City of Fo ntain Valley 20021 Lawson Lane 19luff Circle 10200 S ter Ave. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huch CA 92 44 Fountai Valley,CA 92708 g:1abe1s\phn1b1s PU#HEARING NOTIFICATION CHECKLIST MAILING LABELS -February 9, 1998 7' P ng ecto 2 Jerry Buchanan 29 Cou View Estates HOA 7 f e tmi ter HB City Elementary School Dist. G d Chap 8 es er B 20451 Craimer Lane 67 S 're C r le in er A 9 6 3 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 H ti on e c a nin ire to 3 James Jones 30 ryI r of S 1 B ac Ocean View Elementary a do 1 ig t. School district 71 R Re Bea 0 4 17200 Pinehurst Lane u tin h, 9 49 Huntington Beach CA 92647 o a C 1 C ss 24 Ron Frazier 31 lly 38 r aHen Westminster School District ea la k A a ut as ea ce 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 1 Gelding ircle 0 O a a , I Floo Westminster CA 92683 ntington Beach, 9 649 A 2- i C a tal o on 24 Patricia Koch 32 Koll Company 39 h t ea a HB Union High School Disrict 4343 Von Karman 0 eang te, 10 Floo 10251 Yorktown Avenue Newport Beach,CA 92666 ng Beach,CA 92 02-4 0 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Robert Joseph 25 CSA 33 Lester C & Jane Carlile Caltrans District 12 730 El Camino Way#200 9182 Mediterranean 2501 Pullman St. Tustin,CA 92680 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Santa Ana,CA 92705 Wi Goldenwest College 34 t nf. :F Owe s 3. ar y 74 olde st St. u on ea h C 9 647 2 New Growth Coordinator 27 Co n r s,Be c 5 Huntington Beach Post Office a Pa 6771 Warner Ave. P. .B 40 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Sa to a, A 02- 4 Marc Ecker 28 n * on each 1 Fountain Valley . t Ro ers-La e Elementary School District 77 ding r 30 17210 Oak Street un ' on CA 26 7 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Dr.Duane Dishno 29 u V' s HOA HB City Elementary School Dist. a 'e mas PO Box 71 6 2 er Dri Huntington Beach,CA 92626 un ' n Beac CA 92 8 ZT R R-7-3 g:labels\phnlbls Z(n g 7_ -PLO 4'7( Pfi+-�� 9 From 9'he . esfe Of. � 7 -Maybrice L. Henry Az, Deputy City Clerk City of I funtington Beach I'm &tw Phone: (714) 536-52og ,fax: (714) 374-1557 Date: �117�9,e �. 7 P. O. Box igo - 2000 Main Street - Huntington Beach, CaCifornia 92648