Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCode Amendment 68-9 - Ordinance 1469 - Amends Division 9 of ;affidavit,. ®f Pub&ati®n State of California County of Orange } ss U City of Huntington Beach J. S. Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a �, t citizen of the United States, over.the age of twenty-one years. ux� jai, That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- _ ....-, '' lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide =" - subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and (Published Huntington Beach News i. County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication Oct. 10, 1968) of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any coDE(AMENDMENT 68.9 particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or NOTICE is HEREBY GIVEN .that a public hearing,will, be held by'the City any number thereof. council of the City of Huntington Beach, The Huntington Beach News was adjudicated a legal newspaper :n the Council Chamber of. the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at the hour of of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court 7:30 P:M., or as soon thereafter as of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931. ,-ossible, on Monday the 21st day of October, 1968, for the purpose of consid- ering a Resolution,of Intent of the City NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING That the �Planning Commission for. a code amend- ment to regulations ,of'the Districting Ordinance. Said proposal will (1) Amend, CODE AMENDT'TENT 68-9 the Subdivision Ordinance; (2) Amend Section 9102.1 of.the RI zone to increase of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in said news- ,the minimum lot size to 6500 sq. ft.; (3) Amend Section 1903.3.1 of the R1 'zone -to increase the minimum open a at least One Issue I space requirements in the rear yard to paper require 1200 sq. ft. with a minimum di- mension of 25 ft. with exceptions 'made l o t h October '.for previously established building sites; commencing from the day of (4) Amend Article 910 (RI Zone) by add- ing Sections 9106.2.1 and.9104.5 to permit a reduction of the required front yard 68 loth October setback to 71/2 ft.,for garages and.fences, 19 and ending on the day of I subject to sight plan approval;'(5) Amend Articles 910, 916, 920 and 923 to permit 68 unenclosed stairways,or balconies to en- 19 both days inclusive, and as often during said period and croach four(4) ft, into the required front times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the and/or exterior side yard setbacks; (6) re ular and entire issue of said newspaper Amend Article p and 923 to permit gproper, and not in a construction of a portion of the dwelling supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following within the required rear yard when con- dates, to-wit: structed over a garage and/or carport; and, (7) Amend Articles 9f0, 916, 920 and October 10" 1968 923 by,permitting "01' side yard setbacks �!+ , on one side of the lot, subject to certain ` (conditions and site plan approval. i All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or.against said Code Amend- ment. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. Publisher DATED: 10/2/68, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of By: PAUL C. JONE'S City Clerk 19�. 11 '11, v 17 _ Notary Public C,L` Gou Orange County, California �19 VVOo 14. THOMAS D. WYLLIE _ -'"'f'�`; NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA G� PRINCIPAL. OFFICE IN ORANGE COUNTY / �•.•..•' My Commission Expires Sept, 12, 1970 /' CODE AMENDIVIENT No. Octobsr 3, 1963 That the folloving 5actions of the Huntington Beach Code are hereby addt,�d and amended to read as fal,10-7,0,s- 8 !O'Amily Reg idea peg District Amc!nded :L 2 02.1, Minimum Lot kres, 2 'rho minimum lot. area ohall be 5000 sq. St. with aya average of 600;.) sqo n. or esscl-x six (6) contiguous lots. Waterfront Lotus The minimum area for waterfront lots shall be 5000 sq. ft. Am-e�idt�d 2A,,_9.101��. tiyalmuw Lot Vidth and Froatagts The -mtni--,zmm loi. -tyidth shall be fifty (50) rt. Whin an average Of (60) ft. for each six (6) lots. The mJnignuzm frontage for caul -de-dac and knuckle lots shall bo.) forty rcive (45) rt. Waterfront Cotes Theta, minimum lot wid!:h �or wate%rfront loto nlhAll be fifty (50) ft. 'The miniwum -frontage for �,ul-tfta-sac and knuckle lots shall be thirty five (35) ft. Amanded S.., 93.02.2.1.4 C,&11.culat ions Submittals In all casesv a licenzed. land :Ez,urvsyor or civil e«ainaar shall oubmit ca-;Lculatiorus showing lot widthsv depths and araa-&. xception-0 11011 Side- Yard. The Addedn. E side yard setb&ck may be 11011 on ons side of the lot, -.kubject to th(-:) fo.'&,lowing provisions 1 The lot adjacent to that 31-de yard of the lot hia,ving a 00 11 �atback Phall be held under the Same o,;�,,ners;hip at time of Initial construction and the mi-nimum side yard setback for such lot enhall be 1?011 or 10 ft. 2. The opposite side yard soli back sllall be 3.0 ft o Said ton ( BCD) foot, oetback ohall be perpetually maintained free and clews` from any obstructions, aXcept'0 so A three (3) foot *arfe encro chxr e nt 9 b� Sijlwi tninng pools, C; , wwo-W'al laindscapingo d1 Removable Jpet i o coverr e whick, way. extend to withiT. five (5) fa,)stt; of the side property I:Lnn e 9 amd s, G arQda n s alI aand/or fences (,,,rooming said Ost b cLs"9 provided Such �t�u�tyn�s��� are to the first floor double plate but not to excesd ninon; (9) fost o The -E aiaL L located &t the e101" sidzd yard setback ohall be of wai.i n t anga nc e free, sc lid decorative, waoong,y coanotrr°uction for the rf irgt story only. The aocand story portion shall be of maintenance fr eeg d@coirative maeosnry or amaaeary veneer conGtxc. action'no Such decorative construction need not be used an that portion of the structura obscured from vision by 110" con:.�jtru.tion along the same property line of abutting properties. a Wo portion of the duelling amend/or architectural fealtu> oo shall ps ojsct over any property line. o An Administrative Review accompanied by a precise plan ehm l l be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjuotmenta for approval prior to isouance of any building permits. Sa$d plan 9hal l delineate all structures propoAed for initial is l construction. -2- The Board, after reviewing said matter, may approve, conditionally approve or deny the precise plane. In its review the Board shall considers ao Placement of all structures, bo Building material and finishing of the wall constructed along the sidle lot line, and c o Exposure protection betX-reen structures shall be provided to Building and Fire Department specifications. Added) S a 9103 0 3 0 l h;xc ept ion o 11011 Rear Ya rds The rear yard setback may be reduced to 11011 setback, subject to the following provisions: la The lot adjacent to that rear yard shall be held under the same o­zmerrship at time of initial construction. The minimum rear yard setback on such adjacent lot shall be either "0" or ten (10) ft o 2. The ura.11 located at that "0" rear yard setback shall be of maintenance free, solid decorative, masonry construction for the first story only. The second stony portion shall be of maintenance frr°eet decorative masonry, or masonry veneer construction. Such decorative construction need not be used on that portion of the structure obscured from vision by 110" construction along the same property line of abutting properties 30 No portion of the dwelling and/or architectural features zhall project over any property lines, 4. An administrative Review application a,.ccompaanied by as precise plan shall be suabmitted to the hoard! of Zoning Adjustments for approval prior to issuance of building ng permits. Said plan shall delineate linneate all structures proyosed for initial coanstruction o . The Boar°da after revivulnng said mattes may app Eves conditionally approve or deny the precise plan. ode In its review the Board shall considers 0 Placement of a 2.1 strue tiaras, ho Building material and finishing of the wall convtructed along the lot li,n eg and C. Exposure Protection between structurem Ghall be provided to Building and Fire Department nt. Opecific_ationa o Amended SG' 9�®�`�c3.1 Minim a8u Ojp�� Spaces A minimt open �Pacs og 1200 sq. ft. with a minimum dimension of twonntty-1 l''..rq (25) ft. 53h 1 he Provided �,ith.inn an area bGh.ind the frcnr ; setback. Thio open spgce shall .not include any e ncl Good etructuz�e9 d_rly ,u ay, drivawmy ©agam'e ntt or open parkixn�E-,, f. .� ,o Aloc v €z i d open spaca amy be E lloca.ted as follows.. 1. A minimum cpsn epace oT goo sq. ft a with a gh&U be aUccatted In one (IL) area. The ramp-Laing 300 sego Tt o eg' open opace way be divided Into vtat having a minimum dimen%ol.cn a? fifteen (15) n 3 2. Said 1200 sq. ft. of aspen apace way be divided into two (2) areasq each having a minor area c: 625 eq. f t. 'uith a minimum dimension of twe my-L iv s (25) ft. For the purpa2s of this section,, a front yard shall the that Erect between t-ha front property dine and that Bane deli nsated on an approved plot plan by a structure over 42" in height such as dwallin v garagev fence and/or gall which prvyides a physical o9paration between such area and the remainndezz of the let Added S o 101 .2 Any lagel building site, ae provided by So 9102.1.1 ehall hPL' O-. . open. -space behind the front setback. Said open space may be o4m 1 ; divided into two (2) areas, each having a minimum dimension of fifteen (15) feet plus two (2) feet for each five (5) fleet of last frontage over twenty five (25) feet. In no case shall the minimum dimension be required to exceed 25 ft. Said open space shall not include any enclosed structures, airivaways a drive-,way easemG nt s a or open parking areas, Said open space shall be provided at the ratio of 120 sqm fft o of open space for each five .15) feet of lot frontage; provided howeverg that said open space need not exceed 1200 sqa fft o a. Waterfront Lots Waterfront lots shall not be subject to the open space requuireamennt$ however, this provisions shall not exclude said lots from the r*equnifrimments of section 9103030 Amended S. 9102.4.2j. OJ enn Unnenclosed Stai.rwgys or Balconnie@ s Open uunaenclosed stairways or balconies, not covered by a roof or canopy, may extend flour (4) Feet into the required frost and/or exterior side yard and to within th,rty (30) inches of the interior aide property line, However9 said stairways or balconies shall not project more than 50% into the required setback and shall maintain a minimum distance of Elva (5) facet from any portion of any other building on the same lot Added S o 910 .5 Exgp pti.onns s S o 910L._�,l In order to allow variation in the street scene, fence and/or Ball setbacks may be reduced subject to the folloving requni.remnenntss ao An Administrative Review application accompanied by a precise plan delineating all structures shall be submitted to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for approval b. The minimum m setback shall be 6 ft. provideds 10 Within a triangular area formed by measuring tan (10) feet along front property line from —5— a pointp that point being the intersection of front property line and edge of drlvewayg and coven and one-half QD feet along the edge of maid driveway, gnats shall be no otructu e, fence, walIq hedge or landscaping above the height of 42 inches or below seven (7) ract that would obstruct vision. WithIm a triangular area formed by measuring twenty-five (25) alto along front and exterior property lines from a point Q that point being the intarsection of the prolongation of the front and szt erioT property lines, there shall be no etructureq fence, wai.l n hedge or landocaping Move the height of 42 inches or below oe ve n (7) ft. that would obstruct vigiona Co Said reduction shall only occur during initial construction, and Mall only apply where fives (5) or more contiguous legal building sites are kaki under the same ownership. d o MIximum height for said fences and/or walls ska1111 not exceed six (6) ft o when erected within the front yard asttback required for the dwelling, provided however,, there may be a transition be tWeG n Grid Oiu (6) ft o fences and/or valIG and those fences and/or walls which are permitted on the o ide property Miens .Added n �91106 o 2 o 1 EQ!ce ione s S o 2106 o 2 o 7.,1l In order to allow variation in the street scene, garage setback a way be reduced subject to the following requaireme ntos ao An Administrative Review epplication accompanied by a preci me plt.= delineating all structures res shall be oubmitted to the Board of Zoning Adju atmeanits fog° approval. -6- City of Huntington leach County of ®range State of California -4f fidavitof Publication of J. S. FARQUHAR Publisher Huntington Beach News Filed Clerk By Deputy Clerk Page #11 - Council Minutes - 2/17/69 ORDINANCE NO 1477 - NOTICE OF SPECIAL ELECTION - DELETED The Clerk-presented Ordinance No. 1477 for a second. reading by title. - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDERING, CALLING, PRO- VIDING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON JUNE 33, 1969, FOR THE PURPOSE10F SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF SAID CITY A PROPOSITION .TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS FOR A CERTAIN MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT: " The Clerk stated that due to- .a technicality, Ordinance No. 1477 would be deleted from the agenda. RECESS The. Mayor called a recess of. the Council at 6.�13 B.M. Council was reconvened at 7:45 P:M... by the Mayoa;. PRESENTATION - AMERICAN LEGION AWARDS Mr. Hal Wirtz; Commander of the local American Legion Post and District Commander Kenneth Hardman presented the Medal of Valor to Police Officers Gilbert E. Veine and Edward H. Pratt and-the Award of Courage to Police Officer Jack L. Welsh. ORDINANCE NO 1469 -, :AMENDS DIVISION 9 -ADOPTED --�- The Clerk.gave Ordinance No. 1469 a second reading by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY; OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS -9103.3, 9103.3.1, . _ . , 9163.3.1, 9203.3.1 AND 9233.3.1; BY AMENDING SECTIONS 9102.1. 9102.2, 9102..2.1.43 9162.2.1.4; 9202.2..1.4, 9203.3, 9232.2.1.4, 9233 .3; AND ADDING THERETO SECTIONS 9103..2..1.1_, 9103.3, 9103.3.1; 9103.3.1.1, 9103 .3.1.22 9103.3.1..2.1, 9104.5, 9104.5.1, 9106,2..1, 9106.2.1.1, 9106.2.1.2, 9163.2..1.1, .9163_.3.1, 916303.1.1,. 9164.5, 9166.5'1, 916.6.5.2, 9203.2.1.1, 9203..3.1, 9203.3.1.1, 9204.5, 9206.5.1, 9206.5.21 9233..2.1.1,- 9233.3p.1, .923.3.3..1...1, 9234.5, 9-236.5.1, 9236..5.2 AND 9700 (w) TO DIVISION 9 OF SAID CODE PERTAINING TO LOT SIZE, LOT WIDTH AND SETBACK IN THE CITY'S RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS.!' On motion by Matney, Council waived further reading of Ordinance No. 1469, and passed and adopted same by the following roll call vote: AYES : .. Councilmen: Shipley, Barltett, McCracken, Kaufman, Putney, Green, Coen NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: :None ORDINANCE NO 1478 - REGULATES GAMES & ACTIVITIES, - FIRST READING W The Clerk gave Ordinance No. 1478 a first reading by title - "AN <ORDINANCE OF THE CITY .OF :HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING SECTION 7721.10 OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE RE -GAMES AND ACTIVITIES.,' On motion by Green, Council waived further reading of Ordinance No. 1478. When put to a vote .the motion passed unanimously,! 743 Page #8 - Council Minutes - 2/3/69 On motion by Green, Council waived further reading of Ordinance No. 1468, and passed and adopted same by the following roll call vote : AYES : Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, McCracken, Kaufman, Matney, Green, Coen NOES : Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None �a ORDINANCE NO 1469 - AMENDS DIVISION 9 - FIRST READING The Assistant City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 14.69, which had been deferred from the meeting of January 20, 1969� for a first reading - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS 9103.3, 9103.3 . 1, 9163 .3.1, 9203.3. 1 AND 9233.3.1; BY AMENDING SECTIONS 9102.1, 9102,2, 9102.2. 1.4, 9162. 2. 1.4, 9202.2.1.4, 9203.3, 9232. 2.1.4, 9233.3 ; AND BY ADDING SECTIONS 9103.2.1. 1. 9103.3 , 9103 .3.13 9103. 1. 1, 9103 .3 .1.2, 9103.3. 1. 2. 1, 9104.51 9104 .5. 1, 9106. 2. 1, 9106 .2. 1.1, 9106. 2. 1. 2, 9163.2. 1.1, 9163.3. 1, 9163.3. 1.1, 9204.5, 9206.5. 1, 9206 .5. 1, 9206.5. 2, 9233 .2.1.1, 9233 .3. 1, 9233.3.1.1, 9234. 5, 9236.5.1, 9236. 5. 2 AND 9700 (w) TO DIVISION 9 OF SAID CODE PERTAINING TO LOT SIZE, LOT WIDTH AND SETBACK IN THE CITY'S RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS." The Planning Director informed Council that clarification had been given to the _"Zero" Side Yard Sections , as suggested by Council at the meeting of January 20, 1969. On motion by Green, Council waived further reading of Ordinance No. 1469, as amended. When put to a vote the motion passed unanimously. ORDINAN�60 1470 - ZONE CASE NO 68-18 - FIRST READING The Assistant City Clerk gave Ordinance No. 1470 a first reading by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH OF YORKTOWN AVENUE, BETWEEN FLORIDA AND ENGLAND STREETS (ZONE CHANGE .CASE NO. 68-18) . " On motion by Kaufman, Council waived further reading of Ordinance No. 1470,,//. /rWhen put to a vote the motion passed unanimously. ORDINANCE�NO 1471 - ZONE CASE NO 68-28 - FIRST READING The -Assistant City Clerk gave Ordinance No. 1471 a first reading by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF EDINGER AVENUE AND MONTEREY DRIVE (ZONE CHANGE CASE NO, 68-28) ." On motion by Kaufman, Council waived further reading of Ordinance No. 1471. When put to a vote the motion passed unanimously. 719 Page #10 - Council Minutes - 11/4/68 CODE AMENDMENT NO 68-9 - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - APPROVED* The Clerk presented Code Amendment No, 68-9 which proposes to amend the Subdivision Ordinance and requirements for the R1 Zone relating to lot size, open space, front yard setback, encroachment into front and side yards , construction over garages or carports etc. The hearing had been opened at the meeting of October 21, 1968 and continued to this meeting. The Clerk read a letter from the Orange County Chapter of the Building Industry Association of California, Inc. regarding Code Amendment No. 68-9. Mr, Jim Bentson, 16642 Melville Circle, City, attorney representing the Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, addressed Council and stated his opposition to lot size reduction. Mr. A. W. Knox, 3322 Easter Circle, City, addressed Council and requested that no deviation be made to the 6000 square foot requirement. Mr. Bob Jones , 3302 Bounty Circle, addressed Council regarding this matter, Mr. Jerry Shea, Chairman of the Legislative Action Committee of the Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce addressed Council regarding Code Amendment No, 68-9, Mr. Ron Montgomery, Architect of the Huntington Harbour Corporati-on, addressed Council regarding Code Amendment No. 68-9. There being no one further to speak on the matter, and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by McCracken, Council ordered that waterfront properties will not be differentiated in minimum lot size area from other Rl lots On motion by McCracken, Council approved Sections 9103 .2.1.1 and 9103.3.1 as per the Planning Director's memorandum. Motion carried, On motion by Kaufman, Council directed the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance covering Code Amendment No, 68-9 as proposed by the Planning Commission with the changes proposed by Council included, Motion carried, CODE AMEND 68-10 - PUBLIC HEARING - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - DEFERRED Mayor Coen announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing on Code Amendment No. 68-10. The Clerk informed the Council that they had been provided with copies of the Planning Secretary's transmittal, and stated that he had received no communications or written protests to Code Amendment No, 68-10 which proposes to amend the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code per- taining to Development Standards in the R5, C2, C4, Ml-A, MI and M2 Districts - site area, minimum frontage, building height and exceptions for existing legal buildings Page #15 - Council Minutes - 10/21/68 The Clerk informed the Council that they had been provided with copies — of the Planning Secretary's transmittal, and stated that he had received no communications or written protests to Code Amendment 68-9 which would amend regulations of the Districting Ordinance by (1) Amending the Subidivision Ordinance; (2) Amending Section 9102.1 of the R1 Zone to increase minimum lot size to 6500 square feet; (3) Amending Section 1903 .3.1 of the R1 Zone to increase the minimum open space requirements in the rear yard to require 1200 square feet with a minimum dimension of 25 feet with exceptions made for previously established building sites ; (4) Amending Article 910 (R1 Zone) by adding Sections 9106.2. 1 and 9104.5 to permit unenclosed stairways or balconies to encroach four (4) feet into the required front and/or exterior side yard setbacks ; (6) Amending Article 920 and 923 to permit construction of a portion of the dwelling within the required rear yard when constructed over a garage and/or carport; and, (7) Amending Articles 910, 916 , 920 and 923 by permitting "0" side yard setbacks on one side of the lot, subject to certain conditions and site plan approval. Mayor Coen declared the hearing open. Mr. Royce Coln, 800 N. Main Street, Santa Ana, representing. the Building Industry Association, addressed Council stating he was in favor of Code Amendment No. 68-9 with the exception to the section on open spaces. Mr. ,Terry Shea, 2110 Main Street, representing the Legislative Action Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, addressed Council and spoke in favor of Code Amendment No. 68-9. Mr. Hugh Halderman, Engineer, 1833 E. 17th Street, Santa Ana, addressed Council and spoke in favor of Code Amendment No. 68-9. Mr. Ron Montgomery, Architect, 4241 .Warner Avenue, City, addressed Council and spoke in favor of Code Amendment No. 68-9. Mr. Bob Hubbard, 16572 Somerset Lane, City, representing the Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, addressed Council and stated that their organization objects to certain provisions of Code Amendment No. 68-9 and suggested that different provisions be made for waterfront property. Mr. Robert Helfer, 3472 Gilbert Drive, City, addressed Council and read a letter from the Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, Inc. , which stated opposition to Code Amendment No. 68-9. Mr. Mark Porter, 19842 Providence Lane, City, addressed Council and gave reasons for his opposition to Code Amendment No. 68-9. On motion by Shipley, Council continued the Public Hearing on Code Amendment No. 68-9 to the next regular meeting of November 4, 1968. (AG MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Kenneth Reynolds, Planning Director SUBJECT: Code Amendment 68-9 ATTENTION: Doyle Miller, City Administrator Paul Jones, City Clerk Mayor Coen asked me to summarize the areas of general agreement that resulted from last night's joint meeting between the City Council and the Planning Commission on Code Amendment 68-9. Thus, the following are submitted for your consideration: S. 9102. 1 Minimum Lot Area: Modify the language and clarify that 6, 000 sq. ft. is a minimum: Lot averaging for each six contiguous lots will be permitted and in this case, 5,000 sq. ft. may be a minimum. Waterfront Lots: Modify the language to require 1,000 sq. ft. of water actjacent to any permitted 5,000 sq. ft. lot. Only allow waterfront lots to have less than 6,000 sq:. ft: when the property owner has exclusive use of the 1,000 sq. ft. of water area. S. 9102. 2 Minimum Lot Width and Frontage: Modify the language to require site plan approval by tFie Boarct`of Zoning Adjustments. Reduction of the garage setback to 7-1/2 feet will only be permitted when on-street parking is available adjacent to such lot. S. 9103. 2. 1. 1 Exception: "0" Side Yard. and S. 9103. 3. 1 Exception: "0" Rear Yard: Modify the language to: 1. Allow either a "0" rear yard or a "0" side yard, but not both. 2. Limit the number of abutting houses to two. 3. Clearly prohibit "0" rear yards and "0" side yards for lots adjacent to any public right-of-way. 4. Require a continuation of the decorative wall until it inter- sects a rear or side property line. 5. The decorative masonry veneer required for the second story portion having a "0" setback shall have a minimum thickness of two inches. KR:bwo �"" o l���o� o each HaWn° C�o�)[�SSW P.O. SOX 990 CALIFORNIA 92648 -JDt October 21, 1968 L E T T E R O F T R A N S M I T T A L TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Code Amendment No 68-9 ATTENTION: Doyle Miller, City Administrator Paul Jones , City Clerk Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is a portion of proposed Code Amendment No 68-9. Said amendment pertains to Division of 9 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and will (1) amend Sections in the R-1 zone to allow; (a) an average lot size of 6000 sq. ft. for each six contiguous lots ; (b) an average lot width of 60 ft. for each six contiguous lots; ( c) waterfront lots to have a minimum area of 5000 sq. ft. with 50 ft. of frontage; (d) increase the minimum open space requirement to 1200 sq. ft. with a minimum dimension of 25 ft. Variations are permitted as to how this open space should be allotted. (2) Amend Sections in the R-1, R-29 R-3 and R-4 zone that will (a) require the subdivider to submit cal- culations on lot sizes ; (b) permit open unenclosed stair- ways or balconies within the required setback. (3) Add sections in the R-1, R-29 R-3 and R-4 zone that will (a) permit 110" side and rear setbacks at the time of initial construction subject to certain requirements; (b) permit garages entered directly from the street to setback 72 ft. or 22 ft. ; (c) permit a 6 ft. front yard setback for fences; (d) permit side entry garages to setback .10 ft. All of the above setback reductions are intended to provide a variation in the street scene and are subject to review by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. The Planning Commission approved said Code Amendment at their October 1, 1968 meeting and recommends adoption by the City Council. The following items were not unanimously agreed to by the Planning Commission. The points of dis- agreement are as noted: 1. Lot Sizes'. One Commissioner requested a minimum lot size of 6000 sq. ft. Another Commissioner stated that a 5000 sq. ft. lot was too small and preferred a larger minimum lot size. 2 . Setback Side Yard. Two Commissioners ob- jected to the provision permitting the second story portion of a dwelling having a 11011 setback to abut a public street. They suggested that the second story portion be setback 10 ft. from the public street. 3. Setback Rear Yard. A provision permitting a 11011 rear yard setback along an arterial highway was included by the Commission by a three to three vote. Those opposing this provision were concerned with the excessively high walls which could be created along art- erial highway. Those in favor of this provision did not feel that all dwellings on the arterial highway would be of two story construction; also, that there was no reason to treat lots abutting an arterial highway any different from interior lots. Due to technical aspects of portions of the Code Amend- ment governing subdivision regulations , further con- sideration by the Commission is required. This portion of the Code Amendment is undergoing changes in the City Attorney ' s office and will be transmitted to the City Council after a final review by the Planning Commission. Respectfull submitted, /.Z. K.A. ReynolX Secretary, Planning Commission Encl: Amendment bo The e equuirad setback for garag_, setback less than 22 ft. sh.l� be seven and one-half (71) feet for garages entered directly from a street and ten (10) ft. for a side entry garage c e Said reduction shall only be permitted at the time Of initial construction and shall only apply where five (5) or more contiguous s legal building sites are held under the same ownership, do Garages entered directly from a street having a 71 ft. setback sflas,ll be equuipted with as automatic garage door opener. Rm ruo Family ReG:Ldence District Amended SS 91,62,2.1.4 Calculations Submittals Same a Section gi02 o 2 a 1 .4 o Added Sao_���3.2 a3 , ��c� �laaa�� Q 0" Side YarsAdt 8 Same &a Section 9103.2.1.1. Added So 916 0301 Exceptions 10" Rear Yards Same as Section 9103.3. 1, Amended SE. 9.1� ,,L._ O en Unenc used. Stai.�°;� . s or Balconies, Same as Section 9.103.4.2.3. Added S Exceptions (Z9 nce &_.Wall. Setback s Sane as Section 9104.5. Added SQ_9166.5. . Exc ticaux Setbackj s Same as Section 9106o2a1v 14_3 Limited Mul t igl,e Famill Residence District Amended Soo 9202.2.1.4 Calcus.latio ng. Submittals Same as Section 9132.2.1.4. Added S C�3c_ o. A�sgc�t ticlra.� ae®ea S�,c�t� ���`da Same UG section 9103-2.1-1. Amended S a 9203©3 R�2?&r `bards The mini.mtm rear yard shall be tea (.10) feet, except that portion of a two (2) ota r dwelling which is co netruacted. over a garage and/or carport abutting an alley need not setback further than ten (10) ft. From the center line of such alley,, Alsce aa.d rear yard shall be subject to all provisi.cno of SectIo n 9203a3m1® -7- Added - 2203.3.1 Exception-, no" Rear Yards Same as Section 9103Q3o10 Aneaded, S. 920,2 3 Okcena dtnncenflolosed Stain=Vs or Balconies-, Same as Section 9103.4.2.3. Aided SQ 920405 Exceptions Pence & Wall Setb�ok� s Same apt Section 9104a5o Idided So 9206 hr ce ion? (Garage Setlbaok) a Same as Sec. 9106.2.1. R-4 Multiple Family Residence District Amended a, 92 1.2.1.4 Calculations Submittals Same as Section 9.102.2.1.4. Added S. 9 o2. .z Exc® t� s "04° Side Yards Same as See. 9103.2.1.1. Amended S o 25��� Rear Yards The minimum rear, yard shall be ten (10) feet, except that portion of a two (2) story dwelling which 1s constructed over a garage and/or oarh:,ort abutting &in alley need not setback further than ton (10) feet from the center lime of such alley. Also, §&il gear yard shall be subject to all provisions of Sec Uonn 9233 a 3.10 Add S. 3 0 3 01 Exceptions "0" Rear Yards Same as See. 9.10383.1. Amenac,l ed S 0 t 2` ©4 o,3-.3 Ohs§L n Uunennclospd StairgMy or lconniess Same a& Section 9103.4.2,,3. Added S a 92" 4.5 A&ce t1ons (Fence & Wall SetTaack so Same as section 91104050 Added S 923�e 5 a 1 � o��tlonn g d�a���, � Setback)_ Same so Soo© 9106,,2.1. Article 970 Amended S o 9700 DGfflnnitionna s (W) 'Waterfront Dots Any lot abutting a anovigabl® waterway such as a bay9 cove and/or channel with riparian right of owner (ass access to or use of the shore, bed and water) PUBLIC HEARING SET Publish 10/10/68 FOR: /®... ......... Postcards ------- ---------- -------------------------- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CODE AMENDMENT 68-9 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center,, Huntington Beach, at the hour of 213_0_ P,M, , or as soon thereafter as possible, on Monday the 21st day of October 190_, for the purpose of a Resolution of Intent of the City Planning Commission for considering4a code amendment to regulations of the Districting Ordinance. Said proposal will (1) Amend the Subdivision Ordinance; (2) Amend Section 9102. 1 of the Rl zone to increase the minimum lot size to 6500 sq. ft. ; (3) Amend Section 1903.3. 1 of the R1 zone to increase the minimum open space requirements in the rear yard to require 1200 sq. ft. with a minimum dimension of 25 ft. with exceptions made for previously established building sites; (4) Amend Article 910 (R1 Zone) by adding Sections 9106.2. 1 and 9104. 5 to permit a reduction of the required front yard setback to 7'-, ft. for garages and fences, subject to sight plan approval; (5) Amend Articles 910, 916, 920 and 923 to permit unenclosed stairways or balconies to encroach four (4). ,ft. into the required front and/or exterior side yard setbacks; (6) Amend Article 920 and 923 to permit construction of a portion of the dwelling withing the required rear yard when constructed over a garage and/or carport; and, (7) Amend Articles 910, 916, 920 and 923 by permitting "0" side yard setbacks on one side of the lot, subject to certain conditions and site plan approval. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said Code. AmendsexLL—. Further information may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, DATED- 10/2/68 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Paul C . Jones City Clerk City Clerk City of Huntington Beach The Huntington Beat Planning Commission, at their regular/adjourned meeting held !_ r � 0 recommended of If approval has been recommended, the City Council will be required to hold a public hearing in this matter, and it will be transmitted to you prior to the next regular meeting of the Council. A copy of the Planning Department legal notice, and a list of owners of prop- erty within 300 feet of the subject area is attached hereto The applicant in this matter is (oJ (Address (Telephone) Kenneth R_ Reynolds, Planning Director { Number of. Excerpts 0 ` Publish Once I LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 68-9 NOTICE IS: HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by t u he City Pnning Commission of the .City of Huntington. Beaeh , . in the Council Chamber of the Civic' Center. Huntington Beach am v , g. , California, at the hour of 7:pp P.M. , on Tu sd&y. August 2_Q,,, 1968 for the purpose of considering a code amendment to regulations of the Districting Ordinance. Said proposal -will (1) Amend the Subdivision Ordinance; (2) Amend Section 9102. 1 of the R1 zone to increase the minimum lot size to 6500 sq. ft. ; (3) Amend Section 1903.3.1 of the R1 zone to increase the minimum open space requirements in the rear yard ' to require 1200 sq. ft. with a minimum dimension of 25 ft. with exceptions made for previously established building sites; (4) Amend. Article 910 {s, (R1 Zone) by adding Sections 9106.2.1 and 9104.5 to ,permit a reduction of the required front yard setback to 7� ft. for garages and fences subject to site plan approval; (5) Amend Articles 910, 916, 920 ` and 923 to permit unenclosed stairwa s or balconies to encroach four J4� ft. into the required front and%or exterior side yard setbacks; 6 Amend Article 920 'and 923 to permit construction of a portion xF, of t e dWellin within the required rear yard when constructed over All intere#tech persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed ' requested by said petition. Further information may be obtained from .the office of the Secretary-- -the Planning Commission. DATED this 8th day of- . August CITY PLANNING COMMISSION z �,. K. A. Reynolds Secretary a garage and/or carport; and, (7) Amend Articles 910, 916, 920 and 923 by permitting 110" side yard setbacks on one side of the lot, subject to certain conditions and site plan approval. j j i o 1 ` I c_a C � Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, Inc. P. O. BOX 791 SUNSET BEACH, CALIFORNIA To the Huntington Beach City Council and Planning Commission The undersigned, as offi"cers and directors of the Huntington Harbour Property Owner's Association, hereby declare that on October 20, 1968, ,the Board of Directors of said Association adopted a resolution whereby it directed us to inform the Huntington Beach City Council that said Association is unalterably opposed to the reduction of. the minimum area now required for H-1 lots from 6,000 square feet by amendment to either the Zoning Ordinance or the Sub- division Ordinance of the city of Huntington Beach, for the reasons that any such amendment would destroy the stability of the City°s residential zoning and development standards, and materially and adversely effect the investment already made by developers and property owners who have complied with the existing 6, 000 square feet R-1 lot area requirements. Sincerely, Q A-, o�� GE COUNTY CHAPTER BUILDING IN DUST AS OCI AT OF CALIFORNIA, INC. P.O. BOX 88 • 800 NORTH MAIN STREET a SANTA ANA, CALIF.92702 �O C I R� (714) 547-3333 November 4, 1968 Mayor A. L. Coen City of Huntington Beach Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: The Orange County Chapter, Building Industry Association wishes to comment on Code Amendment 68-9. Proposed Amend- dated October 3, 1968: A. "0" side yard, page 1. We would recommend more flexibility in the wording of this paragraph as to permit an aggregate of 10 foot side yard rather than a "0" or 10 foot. Example: 10-0, 8-2, 6-4, 5-5, etc. B. We strongly concur in both the "0" side yard con- cept and the "0" rear yard concept. C. We do not concur in the requirement for solid decorative masonry construction building requirements for; "0" side yard and "O" rear yard building walls. We would recommend that the City adhere to the require- ments of the Uniform Building Code which has been adopted and approved by the City. D. Pages 4 and 5. We strongly oppose the minimum open space requirements. The average 6000 square foot lot will rarely have a structure covering more than 2000 square feet, leaving 4000 square feet of open space. Elsewhere the Subdivision Standards limit building , coverage to 50% of the lot. We feel that this is adequate and that further restrictions on the place- ment and dimensions of the open space is not necessary. E. Page 7, sub-section d, which requires garage doors to be equipped with automatic door openers . We would oppose this requirement as not necessary and it places an additional expense and maintenance burden upon the home owner. c AFFILIATED WITH THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS 6 F. Pages 7 and 8. We would question the necessity of prohibiting R-3 and R-4 multi family structures from having a "0" rear yard. SJAi4erely yours, rt Royce W. Coln Area Manager RWC/gr cc: Each Councilman and Planning Director ' � r Huntington Harbour Property Owners A.ssociat%on, Inc. P. O. BOX 791 SUNSET BEACH, CALIFORNIA Huntington Harbour' Property'Owners.Association Recommendation' and Request Concerning "Amendment No: 68=9" We commend the Huntington Beach City Council and Planning Commission for their tireless efforts and farsighted actions in developing and imple- menting a superior master plan for land use within the City. We make the following requests and recommendations in connection with proposed Code Amendment 68-9 in thebelief that the rejection of two of the proposed changes would better serve the future orderly development of waterfront residential property within the City. First: We urge that the size of waterfront residential lots not be reduced to 5, 000 square feet (Section 9102.2). We do not oppose the.waiver of "open space requirements" (Section 9103. 3. 1. la) as to waterfront lots because waterways do provide light and air not available to other lots. Otherwise, we believe that there is no justification for permitting lots in prime residential areas to fall below the city-wide standard of 6, 000 square feet. Second: We oppose the reduction of garage set backs to as little as 7-1/2 or even 10 feet because-this would completely eliminate driveway park- ing and create greater congestion and parking problems on residential streets, especially on cul-de-sac streets serving waterfront lots. Finally, we recognize that maintenance of present standards might possib- ly impose hardships on particular owners or developers in the cases of irregular or ,problem parcels of land. However, we believe that the present zoning variance procedures provide a proper method .for dealing, case by case, with these hardship,situations; and that general, city-wide standards should not have to'be "compromised in order to meet individual or unique problems. WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST,AND RECOMMEND that Section 9102. 2 reducing waterfront lot sizes and Section 9106. 2'.A ;reducing garage set backs-not bd adopted as part of the, Zoning Ordinance by the City Council of the City:-,of Huntington Beach. Respectfully;: Huntn t`g on Harbpur"P operty Owners Assn. i By �- Wally Ahearn, President Huntington Barbour Property Owners Association, Inc. P. O. BOX 791 SUNSET BEACH, CALIFORNIA MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON BEACH: WE AGREE that the following Sections of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are hereby added and amended in accord with Code Amendment Number 68-9, dated October 3, 1968. WE APPEAL that (1) the following Definitions be instituted in, this Ordinance Code and (2) that two Sections be deleted from the Code Amendment dated October 3, 1968. 1 DEFINITIONS A Lots: That a lot be defined as a" simple piece of land: one area - one perimeter. B Waterfront Lots: Any lot having at least 25 feet abutting a navigable waterway, such as a bay, cove, and/or channel with riparian right of owner (as access to, or use of the shore, bed and water). C Cul De Sac "Lots: Lots fronting on .the "turning radius of the dead ending street. D Knuckle Lots: Lots that are wedge shaped. 2 SECTIONS A Section 9102.1 (Lot Size) in the present Ordinance Code be maintained and not diminished B And lastly; "that Section 9106."2.1.1 (Garage Set-Back) in the Ordinance Code"be maintained and not diminished. Respectfully mi ted ROBERT A JAMS Huntington Horbq; g V!i yort� Owners Association, Inc. P. O. BOX 791 pp SUNSET BEACH, CALIFORNIA 4 U To the Huntington Beach City Council and Planning Commission A The undersigned,-as officers- and directors of, the Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, here , declare that on October 20, 1968, the Board of Directors of said Association adopted a resolution whereby It directe us to Inform the Huntington Beach City Council that said Association is unalterably opposed to the reduction of the minimum area now required for R-1 lots from 6,000 square feet by amendment to either the "Zoning Ordinance or the Sub- division Ordinance of the city of Huntington Beach, for the reasons that any such amendm6nt would destroy the stability of the City's residential zoning and development standards, and materially and adversely ef'feot 'the investment already made by developers and property, owners ,&Yho have complied with the existing 6,000 sq,!iare ,,foet R-1 lot area requirements. Sincerely, __ November 6,_ 196 8 Huntington: Harbour Property. Owners Assn:, P.O. ,Box 791 Sunset. Be-ach., California 90742 Attention: Jim.Bentson . .:Gent lemen The. City Council of Huntington Beacli atY'tts regular ; . meeting- held -Monday; e. November .4, .-1968, : rceiued and. :filed your. letter -in- opposition- to -the reduction. of. minimum area now. required for R1 -lots...: D ; Sincerely yoursdi ...:Paul C::.Jones PCJ•AW•pa :