Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRecommendation to open Public Hearing and continue to Septem /YPPROva) -o City of Huntington Beach , File #: 19-910 MEETING DATE: 9/3/2019 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Dave Kiff, Interim City Manager PREPARED BY: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development Subject: Public Hearing continued Open from August 19, 2019 to consider the Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Ellis Avenue Condos) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042, a request to permit a one-lot subdivision and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial space and three levels of subterranean parking located at 8041 Ellis Avenue. Staff recommended approval of the project with suggested findings and conditions of approval to the Planning Commission. On June 11, 2019, the Planning Commission voted to deny the project. The property owner, Tahir Salim, filed a timely appeal, per Section 248.20 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO), of the Planning Commission's decision on June 20, 2019. Per Section 248.20(D) "De Novo Hearing", "The reviewing body shall hear the appeal as a new matter. The original applicant has the burden of proof. The reviewing body may act upon the application, either granting it, conditionally granting it or denying it, irrespective of the precise grounds or scope of the appeal. In addition to considering the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing on the appeal, the reviewing body shall consider all pertinent information from the file as a result of the previous hearings from which the appeal is taken." At the August 19, 2019, City Council meeting, the Council opened the public hearing and continued the appeal to the September 3, 2019, meeting at the property owner's request. Financial Impact: No fiscal impact. Action: The City Council may take one of the following action(s): A) Uphold the Planning Commission's Action and Deny Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Attachment No. 1); OR City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 5 Printed on 8/28/2019 p vrer 34 Leg star-' File #: 19-910 MEETING DATE: 9/3/2019 B) Find the proposed project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457 and approve Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 2). Alternative Action: A) Continue Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture, 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine, CA 92618 Appellant/Property Owner: Tahir Salim, THDT Investment, Inc., 4740 Green River Road, Suite 304, Corona, CA 92880 Location: 8041 Ellis Avenue (North side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) A comprehensive description of the proposed project as well as a General Plan and Zoning conformance analysis can be found in the May 28, 2019, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No. 3). The staff report and attachments include the proposed site plan, floor plans, elevations, subdivision map, technical studies related to air quality, traffic, hydrology/water quality, and geological/soils, and written communications regarding the project. B. BACKGROUND On May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed project. Staff had recommended approval with reasons noted in Attachment No. 2. The property owner spoke in support of the project describing the benefits of redeveloping the underutilized and dilapidated site. Two members of the public spoke in opposition due to site access issues, small lot size for the proposed density, parking, traffic, and the existing supply of apartments within the City. The Planning Commission then deliberated and expressed concerns; issues were raised regarding the proposed project's impact on Ellis Avenue traffic, shadows on adjacent properties, unsafe ingress/egress to the project site, increased U-turns at Patterson Lane, the area of the project devoted to commercial use being too small, and marginal public open space. Ultimately, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing and directed staff to return with suggested findings for denial at the next regularly scheduled meeting of June 11, 2019. A full analysis of the required findings for both the proposed subdivision map and the proposed CUP is contained in the June 11, 2019, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No. 5). At the June 11 meeting, only one speaker, representing the applicant/property owner, spoke in favor of the project. After deliberations, the Planning Commission denied the project, finding that the City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 8/28/2019 poweA_ 3g,Legiatar— File #: 19-910 MEETING DATE: 9/3/2019 subdivision design is not consistent with the General Plan or the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) in that the project design fails to further a number of goals and policies contained within the General Plan and BECSP (Attachment No. 6). The Planning Commission also found that development of the proposed project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the type of development in that the site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of the BECSP by merging three existing lots into a single long and narrow 0.95 acre parcel. The long and narrow parcel is not physically suitable for the proposed mass, bulk, and intensity of the proposed four story mixed use project and does not complement the scale and proportion of surrounding one and two-story developments. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Avenue and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Boulevard. Additionally, the Planning Commission found that approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the proposed project results in a density of approximately 50 dwelling units per acre while the adjacent residential property is built at an aggregate density of 13 dwelling units per acre. The Planning Commission was unable to make all of the required findings for a CUP, contained in Section 241.10(A) of the HBZSO, and denied the project. The Planning Commission found the project did not comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20 through 25 in that the project does not further the vision of the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the BECSP, which envisions a vibrant commercial corridor within the Five Points District of the BECSP. The proposed project site is located within the Five Points District and the Planning Commission found that the project does not further a vibrant commercial corridor because: (1) Only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use, (2) There is insufficient vehicular ingress and egress to the site, and (3) The project proposes marginal public open space that does not contribute to the BECSP's vision of walkability and pedestrian connections between public and private property. Planning Commission Action on June 11, 2019 A motion was made by Grant, seconded by Kalmick, to deny Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 with findings carried by the following vote: AYES: Grant, Kalmick, Mandic, Perkins, Ray, Scandura NOES: Garcia ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION PASSED City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 8/28/2019 powerA44 LegistarT'l" File #: 19-910 MEETING DATE: 9/3/2019 C. APPEAL: On June 20, 2019, the property owner, Tahir Salim, appealed the Planning Commission's denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Attachment No. 7). The appeal letter included the following reasons: 1. The Planning Commission's concerns about the project may instead become conditions of approval. 2. The Planning Commission denied the project for subjective reasons even though the project complied with the applicable development standards of SP14. 3. The project complies with the land use goals and policies including density, consolidation of parcels, and provides a range of housing to meet the needs of the City. The applicant's appeal also includes additional information for City Council consideration to address the Planning Commission's concerns related to project design and access. The applicant provided traffic control measures for right turn exit only, additional shadow analysis, and letters of support. The applicant requests the City Council consider the project and the supplemental information in order to achieve a project design that complies with the applicable General Plan policies and required findings. However, the revised traffic control measures do not meet Fire Department access standards and would result in the project failing to comply with all applicable code requirements. More importantly, the raised median design would impede Fire Department access to the site resulting in an additional adverse health and safety impact caused by the project. D. CONTINUANCE: At the August 19, 2019, City Council meeting, the public hearing was opened. Nine members of the public spoke during public comments. Seven people spoke in opposition of the project, citing concerns related to traffic safety and congestion, parking, conflicts with the Elan project, the intensity of development on the site, insignificant commercial area, the existing supply of apartments in the City, and trucks and noise on Ellis Ave. Two members of the public, one being the property owner, spoke in favor of the project. The property owner discussed the proposed improvements to the project site and the need for additional housing within the City. The other public speaker referenced the Housing Accountability Act and the need for the City Council to make objective and specific findings for denial related to health and safety. City Council Action on August 19, 2019 A motion, made by Posey, seconded by Hardy, to continue Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 to the September 3, 2019, meeting with the public hearing open, carried by the following vote: AYES: Brenden, Carr, Semeta, Peterson, Posey, Hardy NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Delgleize Environmental Status: Pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, the proposed City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 8/28/2019 powere4kl,Legistar-,m File #: 19-910 MEETING DATE: 9/3/2019 project is covered under the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan adopted Program EIR No. 08 -008. Implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EIR for the BECSP. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain high quality City services Attachment(s): 1. Findings for Denial of TTM No. 18157/ CUP No. 17-042 2. Findings and Conditions of Approval for Approval of TTM No. 18157/ CUP No. 17-042 (as presented to PC on 5/28/19) 3. Project Plans (see Attachment No. 5 of Attachment No. 4 - May 28, 2019 PC Staff Report) 4. May 28, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report with Suggested Findings for Approval and Attachments 5. June 11, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report with Suggested Findings for Denial and Attachments 6. Notice of Action for TTM No. 18157/CUP No. 17-042 with Findings for Denial dated June 12, 2019 7. Appeal of Planning Commission Project Denial received June 20, 2019 8. Public Comments Regarding Appeal of Planning Commission Denial 9. Appellant's Request for Continuance received and dated August 6, 2019 City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 8/28/2019 Power Leaistar`"' Work Order: #182061 Opened: Closed: 08//19 201 9 ResolutionThis isstie is ivsotved Est. Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Email SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Re the Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No.18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042,8-20-19 Council meeting.(Ellis Ave.Condos)Please deny the appeal.I agree with the Planning Commission's reasoning in its June 12,2019 Notice of Action in denying the project.While I generally support higher density development where appropriate,such development must include enhanced traffic,bike and pedestrian flows.As the NOC states,the proposed project fails in this regard.Indeed,HB needs to improve bikeways and walkability citywide;there are too many bike and pedestrian fatalities currently, and I personally no longer ride a bike on City streets as it is too dangerous.Sincerely,Dan Jamieson Huntington Beach Status Changed:08/19/2019 7:40 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#182061 status has changed from new to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION MqdngDate:_ Ssll q ll 9 Agenda hem No.: 0�0 (19_ �SS� Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:45 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: The Ellis Condo Development Importance: High AGENDA COMMENT From: Gary Tarkington <garytarkington@msn.com> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 5:19 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:The Ellis Condo Development Importance: High To the HB city council, In am sending this in the hopes that you will listen to the citizens of HB. The Ellis Condo Development is a horrible idea for many reasons! It is way to large for the lot, THE CONGESTION THERE IS ALREADY AWFUL, and has had many serious accidents, the ingress outgress there IS ONLY ONE (what are the people going to do in case of a major disaster fire/earthquake)!! Having to make a uturn on Beach Blvd. is insane, AND IT WAS ALREADY DENIED!! WE DON'T WANT or NEED this catastrophe!! Please deny this again. We need some sanity while driving in this area. Ann Tarkington Huntington Beach SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: Agenda Item No.:, i Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:45 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW:Agenda item of city council meeting of 8/19/2019 AGENDA COMMENT SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION From: Mike Mengel <mjmengel@mindspring.com> 4 q Sent:Sunday,August 18, 2019 3:31 PM Meeting Date: To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda item of city council meeting of 8/19/2019 Agenda Rem No.• c40 Esteemed members of council, This letter is written to urge you to vote against agenda item 19-758, which is on the agenda of the August 19, 2019 city council meeting. I also recommend that you do not continue this item to the September 3, 2019 council meeting. This item is the proposed Ellis Avenue condos project, which has already been denied for specific reasons. The specific reasons are: 1. The consolidation of three parcels into one 0.95 acre parcel is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 2. The project does not comply with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan due to land use and circulation impacts. 3. The site is not physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed by the project. 4. The site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of SP14 by merging three existing lots into a single 0.95 acre parcel. 5. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site. 6. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Ave. and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Blvd. 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public vehicular traffic. Vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. The project will not allow motorists exiting the project site to turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. will be required to make a U-turn at Patterson Ln. to access the site. Residents and visitors cannot access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. without continuing past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a U-turn into the project site. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave. only, motorists who do not abide by this restriction due to i frequent queuing on Ellis Ave. can create conflicts with eastbound Ellis Ave. traffic. 8. the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. 9. The project is a four-story building that is incompatible with surrounding developments, including two-story older multi-family residences to the east and a car wash and restaurant to the west. 10. The proposed project is not consistent with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan which supports the use of the Five Points Center as a community retail center. The proposed project does not encourage the restructuring and revitalization of surrounding properties to enhance the market appeal of the Five Points District of the BECSP. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. 11. The granting of the CUP for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will adversely affect the General Plan. The project is not consistent with various specifically enumerated objectives and policies of the General Plan. 12. The BECSP encourages buildings to orient towards streets and provide enhancements to the pedestrian and public experience. Approximately five percent of the building length is oriented towards Ellis Ave. while the remainder is oriented to the adjacent residences to the east and commercial uses to the west. 13. The project architectural design and scale is not compatible with the vision of the BECSP. The adjacent properties will be impacted by the height and massing of the proposed project. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site. 14. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. Thank you for your time. Michael Mengel 16581 Grunion Lane #304 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 mimengel1(aD-verizon.net (714) 846-7196 2 Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:49 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Please vote no AGENDA COMMENT From: plara2@verizon.net<plara2@verizon.net> Sent:Saturday, August 17, 2019 3:52 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Please vote no Please vote no on agenda item 19-758. We live in that neighborhood. Turns on and off Taylor Drive as well as Ellis Ave will be a nightmare. It is already bad enough. People were killed in a car crash on Taylor Drive a few weeks ago. The dealerships are there. Vehicles and car carriers need easy uncongested access to the car dealerships. The car carriers are painful as they stop in the middle of the street. There is no room for more traffic there. This is the absolute worst spot for condos or apartments. We need more restaurants and businesses. No more apartments or condos in this area please. All around us on Beach Blvd apartments have been built. It needs to stop please. Thank you! Pat and Carol Lara SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meefng Date: WWI Iq Agenda Item No.- ��/�- Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:49 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Agenda item 19-758 AGENDA COMMENT From: krica256@aol.com <krica256@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 11:56 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Agenda item 19-758 Dear City Council, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the this item regarding the proposed HDD on Ellis avenue. That corner is already very busy as is. We don't need more HDD right there. Thank you, Christina Silva-Salgado (714)307-7101 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meedng Data: AWida item No.- �O �" Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:49 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Ellis Ave. Condos (#20 on Agenda of Aug. 19, 2019$UPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION AGENDA COMMENT McW&V Date: wftel )le From: Gino J. Bruno <gbruno@socal.rr.com> Agenda ftem No.;dO Sent:Saturday, August 17, 2019 5:38 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Kiff, Dave <dave.kiff@surfcity-hb.org>; Luna-Reynosa, Ursula <ursula.luna-reynosa@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Ellis Ave. Condos (#20 on Agenda of Aug. 19, 2019) Council Members: The proposed Ellis Ave. Condos (Item #20 on Monday's Agenda) should be DENIED when it comes before you for vote on September 3rd. Listen carefully to the majority of your Planning Commissioners who voted AGAINST it. The proposed development violates the letter . . . and the spirit . . . of the Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. Simply put: IT DOESN'T FIT!! At its meeting on June 11th, the Planning Commission DENIED the project, with Findings For Denial that included (if you're interested): 1. The consolidation of three parcels into one 0.95 acre parcel is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 2. The project does not comply with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan due to land use and circulation impacts. 3. The site is not physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed by the project. 4. The site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of SP14 by merging three existing lots into a single 0.95 acre parcel. 5. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site. 6. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Ave. and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Blvd. 7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public vehicular traffic. Vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. The project will not allow motorists exiting the project site to turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound 1 Ellis Ave. will be required to make a U-turn at Patterson Ln. to access the site. Residents and visitors cannot access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. without continuing past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a U-turn into the project site. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave. only (and U-turns at Beach are not permitted), motorists who do not abide by this restriction due to frequent queuing on Ellis Ave. can create conflicts with eastbound Ellis Ave. traffic. 8. The development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. 9. The project is a four-story building that is incompatible with surrounding developments, including two-story older multi-family residences to the east and a car wash and fast-food restaurant to the west. 10. The proposed project is not consistent with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan which supports the use of the Five Points Center as a community retail center. The proposed project does not encourage the restructuring and revitalization of surrounding properties to enhance the market appeal of the Five Points District of the BECSP. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. 11. The granting of the CUP for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will adversely affect the General Plan. The project is not consistent with various specifically enumerated objectives and policies of the General Plan. 12. The BECSP encourages buildings to orient towards streets and provide enhancements to the pedestrian and public experience. Approximately five percent of the building length is oriented towards Ellis Ave. while the remainder is oriented to the adjacent residences to the east and commercial uses to the west. 13. The project architectural design and scale is not compatible with the vision of the BECSP. The adjacent properties will be impacted by the height and massing of the proposed project. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site. 14. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. Please vote to support the majority of your Planning Commissions. They got it right! Gino J. Bruno Huntington Beach 2 Switzer, Donna From: agendacomment@surfcity-hb.org Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 9:50 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Public Comments on Council Agenda Items AGENDA COMMENT Subject Agenda Item #20 - Support for Appeal - HB Planning Commission was WRONG! Name Steven C Shepherd Email steve@shepherdarchitects.com Comments The Planning Commission should have pproved this project the first time and now I'm asking you to overturn their inappropriate and incorrect ruling. The reasons for my support of the applicant's appeal for very simple: 1.The Project complies with Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Codes. 23he Project is similar in use to surrounding properties. 3.The Project updates and modernizes an outdated, underutilized, and visually decrepit property. 4.The Project provides new and much needed housing units for our Huntington Beach community. These are the simple facts related to this project as researched and listed by Huntington Beach Planning Dept. staff in their original Findings and Conditions of Approval document. These findings and original recommendation to the Planning Commission were clear: approve the project. Where the Planning Commission failed our community the first time, you are now being asked as our elected officials to put right their short-sighted failure. APPROVE THIS PROJECT! SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ION Meeft Date: V1 GI 2 Agenda Item No. 15 '0 1�' i Aube, Nicolle From: Pamela Mccay<pmccay85@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday,August 17, 2019 3:19 PM To: Aube, Nicolle Subject: Stop the Ellis Ave Condos Hi Nicolle, I will actually be able to make it to the meeting on Monday but I wanted to send my email again from the previous vote as all of my concerns remain the same. I am born and raised in Huntington Beach and I currently live at 18311 Patterson Ave, #2.This is my third time living on this street in the last ten years and I have currently been in my apartment for 4 years. My neighborhood,which is directly behind this proposed site, already has horrendous parking due to the entire neighborhood being fourplexes. We have been having a problem with Elan parking on our street because they do not want to pay for the monthly parking fee to park there on top of their astronomical rent. I have actually spoken to residents while they park in front of my house. They also told me that they tell their guest to park on our street as well. We see people every day walking to and from their cars and Elan. (And no, they are not using the crosswalk on beach) I have been petitioning to get our neighborhood permit parking and all of the residents are in favor of this. On top of the terrible parking, getting in and out of the neighborhood is horrendous. I can't even come out on my own street because the traffic is often backed up all the way to the next exit. Sometimes I can't even get out on that street(Goodwin). This intersection is already a dangerous area and I was almost t- boned coming into my tract on Monday morning on my way home from work. Adding even more traffic and congestion to this intersection will be a disservice to the city and increase the amount of accidents that already occur here. I personally know someone who was side swiped due to someone making a left turn out of the DK/jack in the box parking lot,which is where the developer confirmed the exit would be when he came knocking on all of our doors trying to get his petition signed to start the project again. I know these complexes are all about making money for the developers, who have already greased the palms of numerous council members to push this through. Our residents do not want this! Most of these complexes have rent so high that most people can't even afford it. I really hope this email helps keep this eye sore off this corner and keep traffic and accidents to a minimum and safety as the highest priority. Thank you for your time, Pamela McCay, BSN, RN SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee*V Date: ?Ilq// Agenda No No.,_11 ` ��^ ?S9 I Aube, Nicolle From: Carol Ballard <carol.ballard.hb.ca@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday,August 17, 2019 8:32 PM To: Aube, Nicolle Subject: BeachlEllis development I'm not sure if you guys are absolutely crazy or what, but there is no way more congestion would be a good idea on the corner of Beach Blvd. and Ellis Ave. I live near there, and it's horrible. People pull out of the Elan apts at about 5 mph as it is and slows down the traffic to a near stop. Adding another building on the other side is ridiculous. I say no to this, a HUGE RESOUNDING NO!!! Carol Ballard SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meebng Date:_ ��//q Agenda Item No.� � i Aube, Nicolle From: Kathy McHale <kathymchale@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,August 19, 2019 7:26 AM To: Aube, Nicolle Subject: Ellis Avenue Condo Complex I am writing this email in opposition to the proposed Ellis Avenue Condo Complex. As it is,the intersection of Beach and Ellis/Main is one of the worse in the city. Adding more traffic to an already congested intersection is totally irresponsible and presents a significant safety hazard. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: Agenda Item No.:d-00 is i Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Monday,August 19, 2019 1:12 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: AGENDA COMMENT From: EVENT EXPOS<eventexpos@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,August 19, 2019 12:41 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Dear Mayor Peterson and Council Members, I am writing to Oppose Agenda Item 20.... the denial of Planning Commission Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Ellis Ave. Condos). was the correct decision. My opposition to this project is strongly motivated by the ridiculously dangerous traffic situation that already exist in this area. I would rather travel the 405 at rush hour than cross Beach Blvd at Ellis anytime of the day, adding more density in this area is a slap in the face to the residents of Huntington Beach... Everyone of you campaigned against high density development.....Show the people of Huntington Beach you can keep those promises... Thank you Yvonne Mauro SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Date: Sll q 11a' Agenda item No.• i Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 12:46 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: broadband AGENDA COMMENT From: Doug Silver Summit Financial <doug@silversummitfinancial.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 11:58 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: broadband SUPPLEMENTAL ERIK PETERSON, Mayor COMMUNICATION LYN SEMETA, Mayor Pro Tem PATRICK BRENDEN, Councilmember Meeting Dat4: KIM CARR, Councilmember BARBARA DELGLEIZE, Councilmember JILL HARDY, Councilmember Agenda Item No. MIKE POSEY, Councilmember RE: Broadband, Wireless, and Transportation Infrastructure Technology Ad-Hoc Committee—SUPPORT Dear Mayor and Honorable Councilmembers, I am in support of this idea and agree with the language below. I live in a part of the city that did not get FIOS and never will because there are not plans by Frontier to improve their infrastructure, they are too debt laden. So the only option is Spectrum which has an essential monopoly and give poor service, slow speeds and high cost to both business and residential customers. Huntington Beach needs to be a 21st century city and can only do this by investing in our community. Technology Infrastructure is the backbone of any 21'Y Century City. When we started our modern cities, we installed clean water pipes and sewer pipes due to advances in public health. In the 1900s we oiled the dirt roads for the coming technology of the automobile; we installed copper lines to support electric lighting and then telephones. Fiber optic infrastructure is the next leap for City Infrastructure. Studying how the City can augment technological infrastructure for businesses, wireless providers and transportation infrastructure will help create economic prosperity just as previous infrastructure improvements have. With that, I support the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council for your body to form an Ad Hoc Committee to study the proposals outlined within the recommendations transmitted by the Planning Commission. I support an "all of the above" approach to review what Government, local businesses and residents need. The Ad Hoc Committee should be tasked with pulling together the disparate studies the City has undertaken in the past few years and identifying the open needs of the community and then to create recommendations to the Council for further study and action. Taking this action in conjunction with the creation of the Research and Technology Zone will signal that Huntington Beach is once again, "open for business." Please vote to support the formation of the Ad Hoc Committee on Broadband, Wireless and Transportation Infrastructure Technology. Douglas Gahn i Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 12:41 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: OPPOSE AGENDA Item 20 AGENDA COMMENT From: Cari Swan <cswanie@aol.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 12:17 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: OPPOSE AGENDA Item 20 Dear Mayor Peterson and Council Members, I am writing to Oppose Agenda Item 20 that seeks the Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Ellis Ave. Condos). I oppose the project on the grounds that it is simply UNSAFE and presents DANGEROUS traffic hazards to an already burdened inter-section in our city. As someone who used to shop and frequent the Five Points Shopping Center, I no longer frequent this center and generally avoid it due to the traffic challenges that emmerged after the opening of The Elan high density apartment complex along with additional high density projects on Beach Blvd. It used to be very simple access from SE HB by traveling either Newland to Ellis or even up Beach Blvd. but both are now over-burdened. It's much easier to find other places to shop (Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley). I can only imagine the challenges faces the residents in the immediate area of the proposed project who do not have other choices for accessing Ellis and Beach and it troubles me that this happens time and time again to residents who have invested their entire lives in H.B. and are continually thrown under the bus by the latest and greatest development whim. I think it's also worth mentioning that I am not a person that considers myself"anti-development"; quite the contrary. I do believe our development must to SAFE and COMPATIBLE with the surround community. I urge you to reject this proposal and not subject the community to further traffic and safety hazards. Respectfully, Cari Swan SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Medng Date: Agenda Item No.: 020 i Silver Summit F N A N C I A l Douglas Gahn Financial and Retirement Advisor Insurance 714.454.7719 714.963.3468 fax www.silversummitfinancial.com Helping families and individuals to Retire Happy and Worry Free 2 Work Order: #182214 Opened: Closed: 08/s201 9 This isstie is resolved Est. Resolution 1. Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Lynn Unger Email Lynnungerhb@gmail.co m SUB TYPE Phone 714-960-0082 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted xl None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Ong DaW: Agenda Nem No.; COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES NO ON 19!NO TO DEVELOPERS...NO TO MORE TRAFFIC...NO TO MORE APT/CONDOS AT THAT INTERSECTION....IT IS ALREADY A HAZARD Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:33 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#182214 status has changed from referred to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Support Worker:08/19/2019 9:21 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182214 has been assigned to Patty Esparta Share with Citizen:NO Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:20 AM Antonia Graham Work Order*182214 status has changed from new to referred. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Worker:08/19/2019 9:20 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182214 has been assigned to Robin Estanislau. Share with Citizen:NO Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/19/2019 9:20 AM Antonia Graham Workorder*182214 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #182237 Opened: Closed: 08/19201 9 This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Not Yet Set Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Roger g Smith Email reslrgsdds@gmail.com SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None xl SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION '�-/i";7// Agenda Item No. a o< COMMENTS&ADDITIONAL NOTES Beach and Ellis property up for review Please stand with our Planning Commission decision! Thanks,RogerG.Smith,DD S BaezaCircle,HB 92648 Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:35 AM Donna Switzer Work Order*182237 status has changed from referred to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:20 AM Antonia Graham Work Order*182237 status has changed from new to referred. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Worker:08/19/2019 9:20 AM Antonia Graham Workorder*182237 has been assigned to Robin Estanislau. Share with Citizen:NO Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/19/2019 9:20 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182237 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #182087 08/17/2019 08/19/201 9 This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Janene Acosta Email acofam@verizon.net SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee ft Dame: COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Aged ham rJp,�e��/ Tahir Salim's project at 8041 Ellis Ave. Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:31 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#182087 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Support Worker:08/19/2019 9:24 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182087 has been assigned to Patty Esparza Share with Citizen:NO Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:23 AM Antonia Graham Work Order#182087 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Worker:08/19/2019 9:23 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182087 has been assigned to Robin Estanislau. Share with Citizen:NO Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/19/2019 9:23 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182087 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #182143 Opened:/ 19 Closed:/ 01 9 resolvedThis issue is Resolution D. Not Yet Set Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Sharon Tower Email sgtower66@gmail.com SUB TYPE Phone 714-962-1909 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None n SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Date: Agenda KOM No.' COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Ellis Ave.proposed Condo/Apartments Please deny the proposed Condo/Apartment complex on Ellis and Beach.HB is already strained by the traffic on our over crowed streets. Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:32 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#182143 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Support Worker:08/19/2019 9:23 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182143 has been assigned to Patty Esparza Share with Citizen:NO Status Changed:08/19/2019 9:23 AM Antonia Graham Work Order#182143 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Worker:08/19/2019 9:23 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182143 has been assigned to Robin Estanislau. Share with Citizen:NO Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/19/2019 9:23 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182143 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #182474 08/19/2019 Closed: 8/19 201 9 This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Kathy Moro Email kathy_moro@yahoo.co In SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meebng Date: Agenda Item No., COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Re The reconsideration of the proposal to develop the corner of Ellis and BeachBlvd.,I again write you in opposition to this development.I sincerely hope that you will turn down the developers request as his proposal is not an appropriate use of the space at that intersection.It will greatly increase traffic and contribute to the problem of high density development in our city. Status Changed:08/19/2019 1:05 PM Donna Switzer Work Order#182474 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/19/2019 12:49 PM Johanna Dombo Work Order#182474 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/19/2019 12:49 PM Johanna Dombo Workorder*182474 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 4:01 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Aug. 19th Agenda AGENDA COMMENT From: larry mcneely<Imwater@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, August 15, 2019 3:59 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Aug. 19th Agenda I ask the city council to Deny Item 19. 19-758, continue the public comments and make the vote without Barbara Delgleize present its done all the time. This developer has requested this delay to game the system. Barbara is a HDD supporter and the developer is counting on her support. STOP THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH DENSITY AT ALL COSTS, The BECSP was a bad plan and still is, the community was fooled into believing this was about a Remodel of the Huntington Center/ Bella Terra that was needed . I have a Question. When the Agenda is published how and why does the city staff get the option to place "Word Qualifiers" after the item number like "Adopt, Approve, Recommended Actions"this wording sways the vote and unduly adds support. Why are they not stated as "Action Item"who is deciding that we use these Biased Statements and Words of Support? Each Agenda Item is the council decision, are we relying on this same staff who recommended the Shelter Purchase ? and the recommended Contractor who Stole the Sports Center Money ?Take back your Local Control and stop this appalling language in the Agenda Items. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION mewong Date: —/2 Agenda Nam NO.;,,,_� 751 1 Esparza, Patty From: MyHB <reply@mycivicapps.com> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 11:37 AM To: Estanislau, Robin; Switzer, Donna; Esparza, Patty Subject: ®MyHB-#181710 City Council [07457] MyHB Issue Type/Subtype Changed -#181710 Workorder#181710 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Status Change issue type Work Order SUPPLEMENTAL #181710 COMMUNICATION Issue Type Meetlng Me: City Council Subtype Agenda Ilea No.• D � All Council Members Staff Member(s) Robin Estanislau,Donna Switzer,Patty Esparza Notes Please I urge you to deny the appeal to the Ellis Avenue condo/apartments. I reside in the neighborhood behind the proposed units.As the left hand turn Lanes from Beach boulevard on to Ellis Avenue are limited,there is already a significant amount of traffic that speeds through our neighborhood as a shortcut to Ellis. I believe this poorly-planned apartment building will increase this traffic because of the limited entrance. Residents will be forced to cut through my neighborhood from Beach boulevard to exit onto Ellis so they can make a right into the development. I already fear for my children's safety to play in the neighborhood and I only worry that this will make it more dangerous.This is also very crowded intersection,with Ellis being a small street,and this poorly planned development will make traffic worse.Thank you for your time. Image 0 0 View the Report Reporter Name Carlee Okerman Email carleerae@hotmail.com Esparza, Patty From: MyHB <reply@mycivicapps.com> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 11:37 AM To: Estanislau, Robin; Switzer, Donna; Esparza, Patty Subject: 0 MyHB-#181829 City Council [07470] MyHB Issue Type/Subtype Changed -#181829 Workorder#181829 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda& Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Status Change issue type Work Order SUPPLEMENTAL #181829 COMMUNICATION Issue Type Date. City Council Subtype Agenda Item No.;_ L9 All Council Members Staff Member(s) Robin Estanislau,Donna Switzer,Patty Esparza Notes Opposition of Ellis Avenue Condos/Apartments File#19-666 We have been residents of Huntington Beach since 1989 and owners of our property in Huntington Viewpoint since mid 1990's. I have also served on Our Home Owner's Association for coming up to ten year's cumulative. I am in opposition to adding more residents to this already congested area.Accidents have increased at that intersection and Newland/Ellis and even extending into the side streets. My daughter when coming to visit with her two small children was a victim of one of those accidents when she veered to avoid a head on collision and was broadsided.Street parking has increased from overflow from Demion and Elan onto Patterson and Chapel,etc.Across from this proprosed is an SRO and not that much difference in square footage to those units.This is not inline with revitalization of the Beach/Edinger City's Master Plan to renovate, revitalize Beach Blvd. Instead, if approved,we will go backwards to contribute to future blight....Run down hotel and strip center,Jack in the Box and Car wash with an SRO and over populated Demion. Five Points, Pacific Center and Bella Terra offer good choices for shopping; but,we need more high end choices and upgraded Town Centers to serve the increased population. Please deny this project in line with the Staff and Planning Commissions recommendations/vote and support the residents instead of this developer.You were elected to support the residents including tax payers of Huntington Beach.This project, if approved,will affect your residents quality of life and there is no community support for this project.We are counting on you to represent us.Thank you. View the Report Reporter Name Kris Carroll Email kcrissie7@gmail.com Phone 714-356-1580 Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday,August 19, 2019 3:18 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy;CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW:VOTE NO ON PROPOSED HDD on Ellis Ave AGENDA COMMENT From:Taylor Haug<taylorhaug@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,August 19, 2019 3:12 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:VOTE NO ON PROPOSED HDD on Ellis Ave I urge you all to vote NO on the HDD Ellis project. The street is too crowded, and the property doesn't fit the existing surroundings. PLEASE,NO! Thanks, 714-421-2748 Taylor Haug SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeft Date: g'• ��• ��J Agenda nem No.• Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 3:18 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Ellis/Beach HDD AGENDA COMMENT -----Original Message----- From: Susan Matthewson <sgmatthewson@socal.rr.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 3:16 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Ellis/Beach HDD Please vote "no" on this project which would further add to traffic problems at this intersection which have already been made worse by the construction of the Elan apartments. This city does not need another boondoggled apartment building squeezed into a too-small space on a very busy corner and traffic corridor. Please exercise some good sense and deny this foolish project. Susan Matthewson Sent from my Whone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date.° /9. Agenda item No, i Esparza, Patty From: Estanislau, Robin Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 3:14 PM To: Kristen Romo Cc: Esparza, Patty; Aube, Nicolle Subject: RE: Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Hello, Kristen. I will include your comments to the record --the Huntington Beach City Council will consider this item on September 3. Robin Estanislau, CIVIC, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5405 Please consider the HB City Clerk's office for your passport needs! -----Original Message----- From: Kristen Romo <kcromo7@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 2:38 PM To: Estanislau, Robin <Robin.Estanislau@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Hello, I am a Fountain Valley resident living near the corner of Newland and Ellis and have become aware of the proposed project to add the 48 unit condo on Beach and Ellis. I realize that as a non HB resident my voice may have zero impact on a decision in Huntington Beach, but still wanted to be counted among those who are opposed to this project. Having lived at this corner for the past 23 years (my home backs to Ellis), I can attest to the traffic, noise, dirt, and countless accidents that have only increased since the addition of the two high density building that are already on the corner at Beach and Ellis. Has there been an environmental impact study? Is there a study on on file? When there is a collision in the intersection of Newland and Ellis, which cities emergency services are called? The decision to add an additional 48 units, and the additional occupants at one of the busiest Huntington Beach intersections as well as the overflow streets seems to be very short sighted. I am asking for this project proposal to be rejected. I thank you for your time. Kristen Romo 1 Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 9:11 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Beach and Ellis condo project AGENDA COMMENT -----Original Message----- From: Kellie Newman <knewman48@gmail.com> Sent: Friday,August 23, 2019 12:37 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Beach and Ellis condo project I understand there is a vote coming up in regards to a proposed condo project on the busy intersection of Beach and Ellis. I would very much like to let the council know I greatly oppose such a large scale project in a small already congested space. Thank you for listening, Concerned neighbor and Life long resident of HB 1 Esparza, Patty From: MyHB <reply@mycivicapps.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:48 PM To: Switzer, Donna; Esparza, Patty; Estanislau, Robin Subject: ©MyHB-#182946 Agenda & Public Hearing Comments [07631] MyHB New Report Submitted -#182946 Status new Work Order #182946 Issue Type Agenda&Public Hearing Comments Subtype City Council Meeting Notes Apartments at Beach and Ellis. I urge you to vote NO for this project. I live on Hartlund and Magic.All overflow traffic cuts thru our tract and speeds there now.The lot the building is designated for is not level so when done the project will exceed the allotted 4 stories casting an even greater shadow on the current residents.Without a second entry and exit the project just doesn't work from a traffic and safety point of view. I understand that Sacramento says to build however,when we strip away all the politics and just look at this project in it's most simple form, it is being forced into a small space. Please continue to stand up for what is right for Huntington Beach as our spokespersons and reject this project. View the Report Reporter Name jay howard Email jhoward250@aol.com Phone 714-261-9922 Report Submitted AUG 205 2019-7:47 PM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not change subject line when responding. 1 Esparza, Patty From: MyHB <reply@mycivicapps.corn> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 8:44 AM To: Estanislau, Robin-, Switzer, Donna, Esparza, Patty Subject: 0 MyHB-#184634 City Council [07879] MyHB Issue Type/Subtype Changed -#184634 Workorder#184634 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda& Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Status Change issue type Work Order #184634 Issue Type City Council Subtype All Council Members Staff Member(s) Robin Estanislau,Donna Switzer,Patty Esparza Notes I am opposed to the building of more apartment/condos at Beach and Ellis(old Car Wash ).Since allowing the project across the street my vehicle has been sideswipe by people cutting through the neighborhood to avoid traffic and my Grand Daughter and Great Grand Daughter were hit by a resident running a red light at Beach and Elis. Their car was totaled.You are putting far too much traffic at Beach and Elis and accidents have increased substantially. The double traffic lights across from Denny's and the second light at Beach are too close together in my opinion as well causing confusion. People are rushing to make the lights in heavy traffic with many running the lights. View the Report Reporter Name Michael Nelson Email mikenelson@socal.rr.com Phone 714-791-4713 Report Submitted AUG 27, 2019 -8:00 PM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ --------- - Please do not change subject line when responding. 1 a 2D1 '_ 50 '" Robin Estanislau, City Clerk 8/21/2019. Huntington Beach City Hall 200 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Conditional Use Permit No 17-042 Council Members We agree with the Planning Commission denial of this permit. They have done a complete study of the environmental concerns of this project and have concluded that there will be an adverse impact to the community. Already there are multiple parking issues with the apartment building on the southside of this project with many of the overflow parking drifting into the residential adjacent residential community. Approval of this project would only add to the current problem. We are residents of Fountain Valley just a half mile east of this proposed project. We have lived here over 30 years and have witnessed a dramatic rise in the flow of traffic eastward on Ellis. This increased flow has caused many accidents at the intersection of Ellis and Newland. Please review the accident reports at this intersection. Both Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach have refused to address the dangerous condition of this intersection which is caused by topography of the intersection where there two blind downhill streets come together. This project will just make this intersection more dangerous. Affordable housing is a concern to most coastal Cities in California but this project is not the correct the solution due to adverse impact on the community. If the developer were to increase the affordable units to 50% and increase the parking allocations to ensure that there would be minimum impact to the surrounding community then maybe the Planning Commission could re-review the project and weigh environmental impacts versus the benefits to adding 24 affordable units to the community. We urge the City Council to reject this current proposal. Wve 8521 Ostrich Circle Fountain Valley, Ca 92708 714-873-5588 Y ;FIVE Robin Estanislau, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Hall 2019 2 ; s 200 Main Street 3 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 v� Re: Conditional Use Permit No 17-042 Sirs: We are residents of West Fountain Valley, in particular just northeast of Newland and Ellis at the address stated below. This permit referenced above outlines the development of a new 48 unit condo and commercial building essentially at the corner of Beach and Ellis (in place of a liquor store, part of a car wash and some level of current residential housing, basically leaving the existing Jack In The Box restaurant in place). A copy of the notice of Public Hearing is attached. This is to express our strong opinion that the development outlined in this permit would result in an extreme negative traffic effect along Ellis far east of the development and other areas. There is already such a negative traffic effect in this area as a direct result of the construction of such an already completed development directly south across Ellis from this proposed one. There are two entrances to our housing tract, one being Santa Isadora from Ellis just east of Newland which provides entrance to ours north of Ellis and another housing tract south of Ellis. The traffic now is such that it is often backed up so far east of the Ellis/Newland traffic light that it's difficult and increasingly dangerous to exit our tract (even when it's not backed up). Also, traffic approaching Beach from the east along Ellis is a nightmare often requiring multiple light changes to get through the intersection. This is due mainly to that already completed development and would be made further worse by this new development. Another traffic issue that is becoming more congested and dangerous is the intersection of Ellis and Newland itself. As there is a downhill approach to this intersection from both Ellis heading east from these developments and south on Newland. Drivers seem to speed down these streets and meet at that intersection with the resultant numerous serious accidents, including fatal ones, other injury crashes and significant property damage. This is further amplified by the lack of left turn signals at the intersection, which has seemingly shown a significant increase since the construct of the already completed multi unit complex at Beach and Ellis. This will only get worse with the construction of this new development outlined in this proposal. We urge the Huntington Beach City Council to reject this proposal for the sake of public safety and overall permanent negative effect on quality of life in this area as, we understand, the City Planning Commission has already done. Thank you 4)1:700 an- o-oo-k-�,— o4 c,— c)u-� Y\" c,&-�x" v\.d s&A d - &�_j L c,,-- Cam.-dam-s ), - .,w �•�.- ems► � U-. `b ©cam -�. �-w..�, ��-�- �- cam, l�-�►1�,�...��� -�.�.a���o�,,�,z., S Ellis Avenue Condos Appeal September 3, 2019 8041 Ellis Avenue Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Project Overview _ 9/3/2019 • Tentative Tract Map No. 18157: to consolidate thre existing parcels into one approximately 0.95 acre parcel for condominium purposes • Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042: to permit the SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION development of a mixed-use building including 48 condominium residences, 891 square feet of ground floor commercial space, and three subterranean levels of parking Me. , Date: r WilE111s Aye �— w,y Ape i �- - N � Q {{ to ►t 11 Background • General Plan: M-sp (Mixed Use - Specific Plan Overlay) • Zoning: SP14 (Beach and Edinger Corrdior SP) • "Town-Center Neighborhood" segment within SP14 Background • 2010: City Council adopts SP 14 • 2015: City Council amends SP14 to decrease residential MAND from 4,500 units to 2,100 units 9/3/2019 • Approx. 1 ,900 units constructed to date • Increased setbacks, parking, upper story setbacks, decrease height, require commercial, etc. Project Description • 4-story mixed use building • 48 condominium residences • (6) one bedroom units & (42) two bedroom units • Affordable Housing: 10�o affordable units required • 4.8 affordable units required • 5 on-site affordable units proposed • 891 s.f. of ground floor retail space • Three level subterranean parking garage • 5 spaces for retail • 24 spaces for guests • 99 spaces for residents r . SITE PLAN - - -- t DESIGN & ELEVATIONS • Brick veneer base � li .., � RETAIL • Metal trellises and � South Elevation (Facing Ellis Ave.) DESIGN & ELEVATIONS ',, i���t�l���■ii�* �� �,.,.., .� ago Hi-inui. nr i i. �.r l:lr� �-- iiii• ,...� ��: --- m •� iii— iniyi- iiun••� ■ � � 1♦ . iiii • •• iiii• nui - . ski nll ... u. �i i..�unn■ nnr�, . ■ ■ Giuu 1i un�i nu. . East Elevation (Facing Patterson Ln.) • Brick veneer carried throughout • Metal trellises and open railings on balconies • Open air pedestrian bridge DESIGN & ELEVATIONS - iiii:- -i:i'i ' r��i..r. -. . - _ .... _.iiii_ _iiii _ _ ....= ■ ■ =....._ — _ - iii_ _':iiii_ iiii ■ � � ::::- -.....- i:iiii. iiii iiii. :iiii. iiii _ _ fill_ ....._ West Elevation (Facing new car wash/Beach Blvd.) • June 11, 2019 — Planning Commission denied the project based upon: — Only 1.5% of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use — Insufficient vehicular ingress and egress to the site resulting in health and safety issues — Marginal public open space that does not contribute to '. the BECSP's vision of walkability and pedestrian connections between public and private property Appeal • June 20, 2019 — Appeal of PC denial filed by property owner citing: — PC concerns may be addressed through conditions of approval. — PC denied for subjective reasons although project complied with the applicable development standards of SP14. — Complies with land use goals and policies including density, consolidation of parcels, and provides a range of housing to meet needs of City. • Includes additional information for City Council consideration — Additional shadow analysis — Letters of project support 9/3/2019 — Project access revision • "Porkchop" raised median design for right turn ingress/egress only • Impedes Fire access to the site resulting in adverse health and safety impact caused by the project • Result in the project failing to comply with all applicable code requirements • De Novo Hearing — City Council hears the appeal as a new matter. — The original applicant has the burden of proof. — May either approve, conditionally approve or deny, irrespective of the precise grounds or scope of the appeal. — Consider testimony and evidence presented at the hearing on the appeal. — Consider all pertinent information from the file as a result of the previous hearings from which the appeal is taken. The City Council may take one of the following action(s): A) Uphold the Planning Commission's Action and Deny ;s Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042; OR B) Find the proposed project exempt from CEQA and approve Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 with findings and conditions of approval; OR C) Continue Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 and direct staff accordingly. Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 8:57 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Ellis Ave. Condos/Apartments (Item #21) - WIPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION AGENDA COMMENT Meeting Date: g131/2 From: Gino J. Bruno <gbruno@socal.rr.com> Agenda Item No.' Jl -q zo Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2019 10:37 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Kiff, Dave <dave.kiff@surfcity-hb.org>; Luna-Reynosa, Ursula <ursula.luna-reynosa@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Ellis Ave. Condos/Apartments (Item #21) - DENY Council Members: The proposed Ellis Ave. Condos/Apartments project (Item #21 on Tuesday's Agenda) should be DENIED. The proposed development violates the letter . . . and the spirit . . . of the Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. Simply put: IT DOESN'T FIT.!! At its meeting on June 11th, the Planning Commission DENIED the project, with Findings For Denial that included (if you're interested): 1. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public vehicular traffic. Vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. The project will not allow motorists exiting the project site to turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. will be required to make a U-turn at Patterson Ln. to access the site. Residents and visitors cannot access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. without continuing past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a U-turn into the project site. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave. only (and U-turns at Beach are not permitted), motorists who do not abide by this restriction due to frequent queuing on Ellis Ave. can create conflicts with eastbound Ellis Ave. traffic. 2. The BECSP encourages buildings to orient towards streets and provide enhancements to the pedestrian and public experience. Approximately five percent of the building length is oriented towards Ellis Ave. while the remainder is oriented to the adjacent residences to the east and commercial uses to the west. 3. The consolidation of three parcels into one 0.95 acre parcel is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 4. The project does not comply with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan due to land use and circulation impacts. 5. The site is not physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed by the project. 1 6. The site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of SP14 by merging three existing lots into a single 0.95 acre parcel. 7. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site. 8. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Ave. and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Blvd. 9. The development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. 10. The project is a four-story building that is incompatible with surrounding developments, including two-story older multi-family residences to the east and a car wash and fast-food restaurant to the west. 11. The proposed project is not consistent with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach Edinger Corridors Specific Plan which supports the use of the Five Points Center as a community retail center. The proposed project does not encourage the restructuring and revitalization of surrounding properties to enhance the market appeal of the Five Points District of the BECSP. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. 12. The granting of the CUP for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will adversely affect the General Plan. The project is not consistent with various specifically enumerated objectives and policies of the General Plan. 13. The project architectural design and scale is not compatible with the vision of the BECSP. The adjacent properties will be impacted by the height and massing of the proposed project. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site. 14. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. Please vote to support the majority of your Planning Commissioners. They got it right! Gino J. Bruno Huntington Beach 2 Work Order: #185711 Opened:19 Closed:/ 01 9 Date:This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Jackie Burckin Email Jburckin@socal.rr.com SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Date:_ 113/1q age►ide Item No.• �/ / —%9 COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES -- Proposed building at 8041 Ellis Avenue.I live at Newland and Ellis and this area is the Indy 500.At least 10-15 illegal trucks per day are driving on Ellis and Newland(excluding Rainbow Disposal),This building would result in an extreme negative traffic effect on Ellis Avenue and surrounding streets.PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS CONSTRUCTION.WHAT A MESS ALREADY.I'd have to move.Yes,the illegal truck issue has been sent to HB Police Department. Status Changed:09/03/2019 8:17 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#185711 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:09/03/2019 7:54 AM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185711 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:09/03/2019 7:54 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185711 Issue type changed from Contact an Executive to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Opened: Closed: Work Order: #185721 09/01/2019 09/03 201 9 resolvedThis issue is Resolution D. Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Kathy Moro Email kathy_moro@yahoo.co in SUB TYPE Phone 714-963-0788 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Apnd8 kim No., Please don't approve Tahir Salim's proposal to Develop beach and Ellis.I believe it would be grossly overbuilding the space,causing traffic grief and not to mention being unsightly.Just look across the street at the elan apts—everyone I know talks about how incredibly wrong that bldg is for the space!Please don't compound the problem! Status Changed:09/03/2019 8:18 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#185721 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:09/03/2019 7:53 AM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185721 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:09/03/2019 7:53 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185721 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO k`. v' x. gyp; F: i? Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 7:38 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Against high density development at Beach and Ellis From: Mike Nelson <mikenelson@socal.rr.com> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2019 8:21 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Against high density development at Beach and Ellis I am opposed to and agree with the planning commission denial of another high density development at Beach and Ellis (the old metro car wash).Traffic is out of control and accidents have increased substantially since the city allowed the high density development across the street at Beach and Ellis. I live at 8051 Sterling Dr. and have had my vehicle side swiped by people cutting through the neighborhood to avoid traffic.This was a hit and run. My Grand Daughter and Great Grand Daughter vehicle was totaled by a H.B resident going east bound on Main attempting to cross beach on a red light. He slammed into them while they were turning left onto Beach south bound from Ellis on a green light. The driver stated he was trying to get through the traffic and did not relies he was running a red light because he had just gone through a green light a short distance at the prior light. It's my opinion having two light so close to one another is confusing drivers who are in a rush because of delays caused by the heavy traffic. This development will increase the danger further and it should remain denied. Michael Nelson 8051 Sterling Dr H.B Ca 92646 7147914713 $UPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeft Date: q13/11 Agenda hmn No: Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 7:39 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: proposed construction of apartment bldging on ellis AGENDA COMMENT From: Florence Pagliassotti <pagfm34@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2019 6:25 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: proposed construction of apartment bldging on ellis We are very upset about the construction of another apartment building on Ellis....This makes no sense at all. It takes most of us 15 minutes or more just to get out on Ellis right now....We live at the corner of Ellis and Newland and I cant' tell how many bad accidents that have occured on our corner, We live in the community of La Cuesta. It now takes us an extra 20 minutes to get our children and grandchildren to school. The traffic and all the noise these Please consider saying no to this project. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Dater !L,31 l Gl Agenda item No.: c24 09r /!�) 1 I have lived on Ellis and Newland for 14 years. The traffic and the noise have increased so much over the years. We have many more accidents happening on this corner. Please vote no to this new building on Ellis it will be very bad for the whole neighborhood. It is taking us 20 minutes moreto get our children to school because we can not get out on Ellis with all the traffic. Thank you praying for a no. Pagliassorri family 8488 Oakstone Circle 2 Please consider saying no to this project.. Our city is being ruined with all these buildings. 3 Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 7:38 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Agenda item 19-910 AGENDA COMMENT From: rob.pool.oc@gmail.com <rob.pool.oc@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2019 11:12 PM SUPPLEMENTAL To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Agenda item 19-910 � � ��C���®� jeptinq!Date: Mayor Peterson and City Council Members: Y Y +..�gnda Item No.: I am writing this email to urge you to uphold the Planning Commission denial of the project as outlined in Item 19-910. In my opinion, our city has a history of poor planning. Developers see a plot of land and immediately develop plans to build as many units on that land as possible. While I understand the desire to maximize their investment, it must be done with some level of reasonableness. A project wedged in a parcel between an established neighborhood and a car wash (which prevents any access to the primary thoroughfare- Beach Blvd.) seems to severely fail the test of reasonableness. I have examined that parcel several times in the last few weeks. I am amazed that it passed the requirements of our Fire Department. I am also trying to recall another property that is long and thin with three levels of subterranean parking. Does another such property exist in our city? These issues are part of an overall theme that seems troubling with this project- ingress and egress. As you are aware, all vehicles must enter and exit this property using right turns only. While I understand that the same issues pertain to the existing liquor store, let's be honest, the number of trips for that one business will be small in comparison to the number if you approve this project. The chance for increased traffic incidences is high. Last, residents in the nearby neighborhood are reporting the impact that the Elan Apartments are having upon their parking. As this neighborhood would be more easily accessible to the residents and guests of the proposed project it's not hard to imagine increased parking difficulties. I suspect these residents were told that Elan would not impact their neighborhood with regards to parking issues. Let's not make the same mistake twice! i It's unfortunate that the parcel containing the car wash and the parcel in question aren't owned by the same entity. If they were, it would be easier to plan for better land use. But that's no reason to look past the obvious shortcomings of this project by approving the Conditional Use Permit. Best regards, Rob Pool 2 Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 1:39 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Agenda Item #21 - I Support the Appeal of HB Planning Commission AGENDA COMMENT From: Steven C. Shepherd, Architect<steve@shepherdarchitects.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 1:25 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Agenda Item #21 - I Support the Appeal of HB Planning Commission Dear Council Members, I support the project proposed for 8041 Ellis Ave and feel the Huntington Beach City Council should vote to overturn the Planning Commission's decision to reject this project. I have previously expressed my support for this project to the Planning Commission and before this Council. Last time I spoke before the Council on this matter I focused on the personal impact of our current housing shortage upon our residents and our community. While my earlier comments to the Planning Commission were centered on the project's compliance with Huntington Beach Zoning Ordinances. Today I ask each Council Member to consider the future. If you uphold the rejection of this project based on a discretionary approval, you are not only robbing our community of much-needed housing, but you are also opening our city up to new litigation as well as supporting the claims made by the plaintiffs in the ongoing litigation. The elected officials for a city of 200,000 residents can't simply stick their heads in the sand and ignore one of the most pressing issues currently facing California and avoid consequences. It was ill-advised when the Council unilaterally reduced the allowable number of housing units in 2015, and it is ill-advised to reject this project now. However, if you wish to uphold the Planning Commission's rejection, I sure as heck hope you have a really good back-up plan. For if you don't, this decision will be "Exhibit #1" in HB's next legal battle centered on housing. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION lMeebng Date:_ q/3/�9 Agenda Itsm No.: i Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 8:50 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Please DENY the appeal to build the 48 unit residential/mixed use building near north east corner of Beach and Ellis AGENDA COMMENT From: Lisa Williams <Iwilliamshb@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2019 2:17 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Please DENY the appeal to build the 48 unit residential/mixed use building near north east corner of Beach and Ellis Honorable Mayor and Council Members, You realized in June that the 4-story, 48-unit residential/mixed-use building at Beach and Ellis was not a good idea, so please do the right thing for the city and all its residents by again denying the appeal by the builder at the September 3rd City Council meeting. Unfortunately, I cannot attend the meeting but wanted to make sure that you understood that another family in HB is against this proposed building project. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Andy & Lisa Williams SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee#ng Data: 2/3 -1/ Agenda Itam No.; i Robin Estanislau, City Clerk Huntington Beach City Hall 34 200 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ` Re: Conditional Use Permit No 17-042 Sirs: We are residents of West Fountain Valley, in particular just northeast of Newland and Ellis at the address stated below. This permit referenced above outlines the development of a new 48 unit condo and commercial building essentially at the corner of Beach and Ellis(in place of a liquor store, part of a car wash and some level of current residential housing, basically leaving the existing Jack In The Box restaurant in place). A copy of the notice of Public Hearing is attached. This is to express our strong opinion that the development outlined in this permit would result in an extreme negative traffic effect along Ellis far east of the development and other areas. There is already such a negative traffic effect in this area as a direct result of the construction of such an already completed development directly south across Ellis from this proposed one. There are two entrances to our housing tract, one being Santa Isadora from Ellis just east of Newland which provides entrance to ours north of Ellis and another housing tract south of Ellis. The traffic now is such that it is often backed up so far east of the Ellis/Newland traffic light that it's difficult and increasingly dangerous to exit our tract (even when it's not backed up). Also, traffic approaching Beach from the east along Ellis is a nightmare often requiring multiple light changes to get through the intersection. This is due mainly to that already completed development and would be made further worse by this new development. Another traffic issue that is becoming more congested and dangerous is the intersection of Ellis and Newland itself. As there is a downhill approach to this intersection from both Ellis heading east from these developments and south on Newland. Drivers seem to speed down these streets and meet at that intersection with the resultant numerous serious accidents, including fatal ones, other injury crashes and significant property damage. This is further amplified by the lack of left turn signals at the intersection, which has seemingly shown a significant increase since the construct of the already completed multi unit complex at Beach and Ellis. This will only get worse with the construction of this new development outlined in this proposal. We urge the Huntington Beach City Council to reject this proposal for the sake of public safety and overall permanent negative effect on quality of life in this area as, we understand, the City Planning Commission has already done. Thankyou n SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION �,l� G's%r��•� �1� Meeting ore• 113111 Agenda nem No.• i/z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 19, 2019, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: 1. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 181571CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 Applicant: Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture, 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine CA 92618 Appellant:_ Tahir Salim, THDT Investment, 4740 Green River Road, Suite 304, Corona, CA 92880 Request: To demolish an existing liquor store, residence; and portion of a former car wash to permit a one- lot subdivision and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial space and three levels of subterranean parking. Location: 8041 Ellis Avenue Beach Boulevard (North side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) City Contact: Nicolle Aube, Associate Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, because the project is within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan for which Program EIR No. 08-008 was adopted and implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EIR for the BECSP. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington ' Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office or on line at httc://.,�nNv..h--,ntin tonbeachca.c ov on Thursday, August 15, 2019. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Robin Estanislau, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Switzer, Donna From: Esparza, Patty Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2019 1:37 PM To: Switzer, Donna Subject: FW: Correspondence from Californians for Homeownership Attachments: 2019-9-3 - Californians Letter to City Council.pdf Patty Esparza, CAIC Assistant City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5260 From:Aube, Nicolle <nicolle.aube@surfcity-hb.org> Sent:Tuesday, September 03, 2019 1:36 PM To: Esparza, Patty<PEsparza@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: FW: Correspondence from Californians for Homeownership Late Communication received From: Matthew Gelfand <ad min @caforhomes.org>On Behalf Of Matthew Gelfand Sent:Tuesday,September 03, 2019 1:30 PM To: Brenden, Patrick<Patrick.Brenden@surfcity-hb.org>; Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Hardy,Jill<Jill.Hardy@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik<Erik.Peterson@surfcity- hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>;Semeta, Lyn<Lyn.Semeta@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy <CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:Gates, Michael <Michael.Gates@surfcity-hb.org>; Luna-Reynosa, Ursula <ursula.luna-reynosa@surfcity-hb.org>; Aube, Nicolle<nicolle.aube@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Correspondence from Californians for Homeownership To the City Council: Please see the attached correspondence regarding the Ellis Avenue Condos appeal being discussed at your upcoming meeting. Sincerely, SUPPLEMENTAL Matthew Gelfand COMMUNICATION matt@caforhomes.org Meetlng Date: iz3Z/ Agenda Item No.: q/ 1 i Opened: Closed: Work Order: #186176 09/03/2019 09/04 201 9 resolvedThis issue is Resolution D. Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Matthew Gelfand Email matt@caforhomes.org SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:--- Agenda Item No.• �/L /�1�-�/d COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Please see the attached correspondence regarding the Ellis Avenue Condos appeal being discussed at your upcoming meeting. Status Changed:09/04/2019 8:58 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#186176 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Hi Matthew,Please be advised if your intended attachment was,"Californians Letter to City Council," dated September 3,2019,it has been received and will be included as Supplemental Communication to the related agenda item.If this letter was not your intended attachment to your comment submitted through MyHB,please send the attachment to Donna.Switzer@surfcity-hb.org.Thank you,Donna Switzer Deputy City Clerk Share with Citizen:YES Notes Added By staff:09/03/2019 2:16 PM Robin Estanislau Hello,I don't see the attachment your message refers to...please advise.Robin Estanislau City Clerk Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:09/03/2019 2:06 PM Johanna Dombo Work Order#186176 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:09/03/2019 2:06 PM Johanna Dombo Workorder#186176 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO MATTHEW GELFAND,COUNSEL CALIFORNIANS FOR MATT@CAFORHOMES.ORG 0 HOMEOWNERSHIP TEL:(213)739-8206 September 3, 2019 VIA EMAIL AND ONLINE SUBMISSION City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Email: patrick.brenden@surfcity-hb.org; kim.carr@surfcity-hb.org; barbara.delgleize@surfcity-hb.org;jill.hardy@surfcity-hb.org; erik.peterson@surfcity-hb.org; mike.posey@surfcity-hb.org; lyn.semeta@surfcity-hb.org; cfikes@surfcity-hb.org RE: September 3, 2019 City Council Meeting, Case Number 19-910 Appeal of Planning Commission denial re: Ellis Avenue Condos To the City Council: We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the appeal related to the Ellis Avenue Condos project, which will be considered at the Council's meeting on September 3, 2019. Californians for Homeownership is a 501(c)(3) organization devoted to using litigation to address California's housing crisis. We are writing to remind you of Huntington Beach's legal duty to play its part in addressing the housing crisis by facilitating the development of housing within its borders. For several decades, California has experienced a significant housing access and affordability crisis. In recent years, this crisis has reached historic proportions. As a result of the housing affordability crisis, younger Californians are being denied the opportunities for homeownership and housing security that were afforded to previous generations. Many middle and lower income families devote more than half of their take-home pay to rent, leaving little money to pay for transportation,food,healthcare,and other necessities. Unable to set aside money for savings,these families are denied the opportunity to become homeowners,and are at grave risk of losing their housing in the event of a medical issue, car trouble, or other personal emergency. Indeed, housing insecurity in California has led to a mounting homelessness crisis. And the crisis has had a disproportionately harmful effect on historically disadvantaged communities, including individuals with physical and developmental disabilities and communities of color. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ► Dwq: g/3/1�_____._. 525 S.Virgil Avenue Mm �/ /q— �/0 Los Angeles,CA 90020 14f September 3, 2019 Page 2 What's more,the housing crisis is having a severe impact on the environment,in California and beyond. When workers are denied housing opportunities near job centers, they are forced to commute long distances to find housing they can afford. This contributes to air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and traffic. At the core of California's housing crisis is its failure to build enough new housing to meet the needs of its growing population. The Legislative Analyst's Office estimates that, from 1980 to 2010, the state should have been building approximately 210,000 units a year in major metropolitan areas to meet housing demand. Instead, it built approximately 120,000 units per year during that period. And the situation is getting worse: in the five-year period from 2013 to 2017 California issued building permits for less than half as many units as it did in 1985-1989. Today, California ranks 49th out of the 50 states in existing housing units per capita. Huntington Beach is surely aware of the gravity of the housing crisis, having faced litigation for the better part of a decade over its failure to do its part in planning to build enough housing to meet the region's housing needs. The legislature has recognized that the housing crisis is an emergency that requires proactive solutions: "The consequences of failing to effectively and aggressively confront this crisis are hurting millions of Californians, robbing future generations of the chance to call California home, stifling economic opportunities for workers and businesses, worsening poverty and homelessness,and undermining the state's environmental and climate objectives." Gov.Code § 65589.5(a)(2)(A). As part of its efforts to address the crisis in the 1980s, the legislature passed the Housing Accountability Act(often called the "anti-NIMBY law"), which limits the ability of localities—like Huntington Beach to reject proposed housing development projects. Id. In recent years, it has strengthened the law by adding additional penalties for non-compliance and providing a statutory right of action for housing organizations (like Californians for Homeownership)to sue to enforce the law. The Housing Accountability Act generally requires you to approve a housing development project or related subdivision application, without a reduction in density, unless the project does not comply with "applicable, objective general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards and criteria, including design review standards, in effect at the time that the housing development project's application is determined to be complete." Gov.Code§ 65589.50)(1)(emphasis added). More specifically, among other obligations,the Act requires: • That you make a written determination whether the development is consistent with such standards. Gov. Code § 65589.50)(2)(A). In making this determination, you must err on the side of approving a project if the evidence "would allow a reasonable person to conclude" that the project met the relevant standard. Gov. Code § 65589.5(f)(4). That means that if(as happened here) city staff previously determined that a proiect met those standards you must find that staff acted unreasonably in doing so if you wish to uphold the Planning Commission's determination that the project does not meet those standards September 3, 2019 Page 3 • If you determine that the project is not consistent with such standards, you must provide(at the same time)written documentation identifying the standards that the project does not meet and explaining the specific basis for your decision. Id. • If you determine that the project is consistent with such standards,but nevertheless propose to reject the project or require it to be developed at a lower density, you must make written findings, supported by evidence, that the project would have a "specific,adverse impact upon the public health or safety,"meaning that the project would have "a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete." These provisions apply to all housing developments and housing-rich mixed use developments, including market rate projects. Gov. Code § 65589.5(h)(2); see Honchariw v. Cty. ofStanislaus,200 Cal. App. 4th 1066, 1074-76 (2011). When a locality rejects or downsizes a housing development project without complying with the rules described above, the action may be challenged in court in a special mandamus proceeding. The legislature has significantly reformed this process over the last few years in an effort to increase compliance. Today, the law provides a private right of action to both potential residents of the rejected development and to non-profit organizations like Californians for Homeownership. See Gov. Code § 65589.5(k). A potential resident or non-profit organization can sue without the involvement or approval of the project applicant,to protect the public's interest in the development of new housing. A locality that is sued to enforce Section 65589.5 must prepare the administrative record itself, at its own expense, within 30 days after service of the petition. Gov. Code § 65589.5(m). And if an enforcement lawsuit brought by a non-profit organization is successful, the locality must pay the organization's attorneys' fees. Gov. Code § 65589.5(k)(2). In certain cases, a court can impose fines that start at $10,000 per proposed housing unit. Gov. Code § 65589.5(k)(1)(B)(i). In recent years,there have been a number of successful lawsuits to enforce these rules: • In Honchariw, 200 Cal. App. 4th 1066,the Court of Appeal vacated the County of Stanislaus's denial of an application to subdivide a parcel into eight lots for the development of market-rate housing. The court held that the county did not identify any objective standards that the proposed subdivision would not meet,and therefore violated the Housing Accountability Act in denying the application. • In Eden Housing, Inc. v. Town of Los Gatos, Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 16CV300733,the court determined that Los Gatos had improperly denied a subdivision application based on subjective factors. The court found that the factors cited by the town, such as the quality of the site design, the unit mix, and the anticipated cost of the units, were not objective because they did not refer to specific,mandatory criteria to which the applicant could conform. September 3, 2019 Page 4 • San Francisco Bay Area Renters Federation v. Berkeley City Council, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG16834448, was the final in a series of cases relating to Berkeley's denial of an application to build three single family homes and its pretextual denial of a demolition permit to enable the same project. The Court ultimately ordered the city to approve the project and to pay $44,000 in attorneys' fees. In other cases—for example,in the case of a proposed development in Sausalito—localities have settled lawsuits by agreeing to approve the subject projects and pay tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses. The findings adopted by the Planning Commission do not identify s e� cific, objective criteria not met by the proposed project. In some cases, the findings identify mere advisory suggestions or recommendations rather than actual standards. In other cases,they refer to vague, subjective concepts—for example, determining that the project is "too bulky" and "too intense" without identify specific, objective massing rules that the project violates. The purpose of the Housing Accountability Act is to provide developers of housing with specific,obiective criteria to which they can conform their development proposals. If a city was permitted to reject a project based on the sort of vague, subjective criteria identified by the Planning Commission, that would render the law meaningless. Even if the Planning Commission had applied appropriate standards under the Housing Accountability Act, its findings are insufficient to meet the city's burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the record evidence would not"allow a reasonable person to conclude"that the project met the standards. Gov. Code §§ 65589.5(f)(4), (i). Because City staff recommended approval of the project based on staff s assessment that the project was consistent with objective zoning criteria, and prepared findings to that effect in advance of the Planning Commission's May 28,2019 meeting,the City cannot now claim that no reasonable person would make those same findings. Apparently recognizing that the City would risk violating the Housing Accountability Act by denying this appeal, City staff have drafted proposed findings regarding the "negative impact to health and safety"that would be caused by the project. The findings suggest that, if the project is approved and the existing traffic patterns are maintained, the project will produce additional u- turns, which could increase traffic accidents. The proposed findings fall woefully short of the City's burden to demonstrate,by a preponderance of the evidence,that the project would cause "a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards,policies,or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete." The proposed findings do not attempt to quantify the actual additional traffic safety risk, they do not identify a written public health or safety standard that the project violates, and they do not assess the full range of potential mitigations that would avoid the purported impacts. At a more fundamental level,the same basic assessment could be used to deny any zoning-compliant project on this site, which would make a mockery of the Housing Accountability Act. September 3,2019 Page 5 The information presented to the Planning Commission indicates that this project will create around 20 trips per hour. To deny a proposal to build zoning-compliant housing based on the "health and safety" impact of an extra car every three minutes is so obviously pretextual that it borders on self-parody. It will only result in yet another set of lawsuits that will make the City the focus of local and national derision for its exclusionary housing policies. For the sake of the City's finances and its reputation, do not force a lawsuit here. Sincerely, j' atthew Gelfand cc: Michael Gates,Esq.,City Attorney By email to: michael.gates@surfcity-hb.org Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Community Development Director By email to: ursula.luna-reynosa@surfcity-hb.org Nicolle Aube,Associate Planner By email to: nicolle.aube@surfcity-hb.org Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:59 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: reject agenda 19-910 Importance: High AGENDA COMMENT From: Shawna Behrens<SBehrens@loandepot.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:58 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: reject agenda 19-910 Importance: High Good morning, I am a single family home owner in Huntington Beach and I reject agenda item 19-910. 1 do not want more people clogging up our already crowded streets and beaches and schools. Thank you, Shawna Shawna Behrens Sr. Account Manager Ill (949) 707-9459 (888) 337-6888 ext. 3359 SUPPLEMENTAL l 1-1833 865 5557 COMMUNICATION p SBehrens(c-)loandepot.com Ld https://www.IoanDepot.com Meeting Date: g�3 f iq Agenda ftem No.• 26642 Towne Centre Drive,Foothill Ranch,CA 92610 ' kWU>qW. NMLS#174457 Customer service is our top priority:If you are not receiving exceptional customer service,or if you have any questions,please contact us at www.loandepot.com/about/contactus. Confidentiality Note:This email and any attachment(s)are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may be confidential and/or privileged. Any unauthorized use,disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please immediately notify the sender by return email,and delete the message. Please consider the environment before printing this email. 1 Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 9:00 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: proposed building corner of Ellis and Beach, Huntington Beach AGENDA COMMENT From: Sandy<sandyw692@aol.com> Sent:Thursday, August 29, 2019 5:36 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: proposed building corner of Ellis and Beach, Huntington Beach Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: I reside at 8412 Bluff Circle, H.B. (Newland and Ellis) and am requesting that you vote "no"to the proposed building on the corner. Traffic has increased dramatically since the apartment buildings went across the street from the proposed sight. We can hardly get out of our condo to get onto Ellis or to get to our condo. Please hold your vote of"no" from June -and not add to the congestion on Ellis. Thank you, Sandy Chute 8412 Bluff Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee"Date: Agenda Item Ido.• Cx 0) Work Order: #184886 Opened: Closed: 08/29 201 9 resolvedThis issue is Resolution D. Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Concerned Citizen Email not@aol.com SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meedng Date: Agenda item No.: COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES STOP the development on ELLIS the traffic is bad enough and that is one of the most dangerous intersections already!!!! Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:16 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#184886 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:13 AM Johanna Domho Work Order#184886 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 8:13 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder#184886 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #185188 08/29/2019 Closed: 8/29 201 9 resolvedThis issue is Resolution D. Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Dawn Crowley Email older.than.dirt@hotmai 1.com SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION AOMWO Item No.. COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Northeast Beach and Ellis condo project Do NOT approve the plans to build this monstrosity at this intersection.It lacks the character of HB,in addition to having inadequate parking and sturdy access. Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:48 PM Donna Switzer Work Order#185188 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:15 PM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185188 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 1:15 PM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185188 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #185187 Opened:/ 19 Closed:/ 01 9 resolvedThis issue is Est. Resolution Date: Not Yet Set Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Dawn Crowley Email older.than.dirt@hotmai 1.com SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL. COMMUNICATION MeefMg Date:— cl3L2 Agenda item No.: COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Northeast Beach and Ellis condo plan Do NOT approve building this monstrosity!It includes too many units in too small a space with inadequate parking and road access. Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:48 PM Donna Switzer Work Order#185187 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:16 PM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185187 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 1:16 PM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185187 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #184926 Opened: 8 28/2019 Closed: 8/29 201 9 resolvedThis issue is Resolution D. Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By David Day Email davidday28@yahoo.co m SUB TYPE City Council Meeting Phone 714-330-1224 Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Modng Date: 2LP95) Agenda Nem No.: COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Please stop building in our city.I have lived here for 48 years since I was 5 years old.It's sad how our city has turned into just another concrete jungle and looks just like every other city around us.You all promised you would stop the expansions.I know it's all about the money. Sad. Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:20 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#184926 status has changed from new to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 8:12 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder#184926 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Opened: Closed: Work Order: #185230 08/29/2019 08/29201 9 resolvedThis issue is • • D. Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By robert dominguez Email bobbydominguez@veriz on.net SUB TYPE Phone 714-615-0158 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee"Date: Agenda Item No.• U--)�. COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Ellis Ave condos/apartments.The Planning commission denied this project.I support the denial.We don't need additional high density building in our city.Please uphold the planning commission's recommendation. Status Changed:08/29/2019 2:27 PM Donna Switzer Work Order#185230 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 2:01 PM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185230 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 2:01 PM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185230 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:06 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW:I urge you to reject 19-910 AGENDA COMMENT From:Taylor Haug<hb.city.tax@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,August 29, 2019 7:55 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: I urge you to reject 19-910 Please reject 19-910 on the September 3rd City County meeting. As a long time resident and homeowner, we do not need more HDD development, let alone a project of this size in such a small space. The surrounding homes would be towered over, and the shops on the corner would be looked down upon. After all, who would want to live hearing car washes all day and the smell of Jack in the Box? Thanks, Renato Ernest. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION McOng Date: GI• 3• /9 Agenda 1kn No.- Cal l�— q10) Work Order: #185164 Opened:/219 Closed:// /01 9 ResolutionThis issue is resolved Fst. Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Victoria Farnsworth Email my2dawgz@gmail.com SUB TYPE Phone 714-975-3459 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 2 /2 Agenda Item No.:_ `4 COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Ellis Avenue Apartments:I am a 35 yr.resident at 18401 Goodwin Lane.Goodwin intersects directly on to Ellis at the top of what I call the Ellis hill and is a main entrance/exit thorough fare for this area.Our neighborhood has undergone a radical commercial/housing development transformation in the past 35 years significantly increasing traffic in the area.I write this to ask you to deny the appeal for the Ellis Avenue Apartment project for the following reasons: Traffic safety-Like it or not,we live in an age of distracted drivers travelling at increased rates of speed to get from points A to B as quickly as possible.Currently residential traffic from 4 neighborhood streets and 6 entrance/exit driveways associated with high density living areas empty out on to Ellis Ave between Newland Ave and Beach Blvd.The past 3-5 years have shown higher levels of vehicle and pedestrian accidents in the Beach/Ellis corridors than ever before.The steep ascent(heading west on Ellis)has resulted in cars traveling at high rates of speed as they accelerate up the hill.The vehicle acceleration continues as drivers rush to Beach Blvd to either turn right on to Beach or move in to the right-hand lane to cross Beach and transition back on to Ellis where is splits off of Main(at Denny's).The Ellis Ave Apartment project proposes a single entrance/exit driveway off of Ellis just feet before 1)The Ellis entrance to Jack in the Box,2)The right hand turn lane on to Beach Blvd,and 3)The right hand lane that allows drivers to continue on to Ellis(west of Beach).The influx of additional traffic at this already congested intersection can only aggravate what is already a high anxiety area for our city's drivers(Not to mention the new residents of the proposed development).I also fear for these future residents should an accident or some unforeseen safety crisis occur that blocks the subject driveway and prevents emergency services from entering/exiting the complex.This situation is unsafe and not reasonable for any resident to accept.Skyline-The proposed 4-story apartment building will sit approximately 100 yards directly north of the Elon 4-6 story apartment building.It will essentially eliminate the skyline for all residents residing in the area east of it.This raises additional concerns for those with solar energy systems (allegedly a high priority area for city council),in that hours upon hours of sunshine will be no longer be available to existing solar-powered residents.The shadow study performed by the developer insufficiently addressed shaded areas during a 365 day,24 hour/day period.The +.,a......�,- SUM- +n.nA-— DI--+we;,,+ 4-4i� 4­4,1..n.10_r.nA-- ,,. the late fall and early winter months).Neighborhood Fit-The Ellis apartment project tries to fit a 7-level(4-stories up and 3 down for parking),i.e.a 48-unit complex in to a one-acre piece of land that is sandwiched between a car wash on one side and homes/condominiums on the other(on Patterson Ave).There is no access to Beach Blvd within the proposed property.There is no immediate green space that is easily accessible to residents(Helme Park is driving distance away but not walkable with current traffic levels).Again,I ask you to please deny the appeal for the Ellis Avenue Apartment project for the reasons stated above! Sincerely,Victoria Farnsworth Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:47 PM Donna Switzer Work Order#185164 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:NO Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:47 PM Donna Switzer Work Order#185164 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:15 PM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185164 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 1:15 PM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185164 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Thursday,August 29, 2019 8:06 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: REJECT 19-910 AGENDA COMMENT From:Taylor Haug<taylorhaug@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, August 29, 2019 7:51 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: REJECT 19-910 I urge you all to reject 19-910. The building is not suitable with the surrounding properties. The entrance/exit will be a nightmare for surrounding homeowners. Ellis and Beach is already one of the worst intersections in Huntington Beach. HB Residents have continually voiced their opposition to additional HDD. Finally, the out the builders have to turn it into apartments if they cannot sell is not what HB residents want or need. These wouldn't be "affordable" housing apartments, so that is not an excuse. Thanks, Taylor Haug SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Date: 22 3 -lq Agenda Mem No., C)l /01—q14- Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:00 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: 19-910 Reject Please AGENDA COMMENT From: Kori Haug<korilhaug@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, August 29, 2019 8:21 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: 19-910 Reject Please The traffic in the area is already bad. People are cutting through the neighborhoods between already on Ellis to avoid the intersection, and most are speeding. It is not safe for our family and kids. Additionally, the HDD and traffic is already horrible in Huntington Beach, and by jamming these units into this small area doesn't fit. Please reject 19-910. Thanks, Kori SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION MeeMg Data: 113//GI Agenda Item No.: Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 9:00 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: agenda item 19-910 AGENDA COMMENT From: Logan Haug<loganjhaug@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,August 29, 2019 8:24 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: agenda item 19-910 Hi City Council, I am a single family owner in HB and I reject agenda item 19-910. I do not want more people clogging up our already crowded streets, beaches and schools. Enough is enough. Thanks, Logan Haug SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meekg Date: qlt Lo Agenda Clem Wo.• a l l -ql D Work Order: #184882 Opened:/ 19 Closed:// 01 9 resolvedThis issue is Resolution Date: N• By Darrin&Billie Agenda & Public Hearing Comments Horowitz SUB TYPE Email DLwitz@aol.com City Council Meeting Phone 714-401-9876 Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLIEMEN 1 M` COMMUNICATION MWft Date: GI. 3 . /2 Agenda Item No:a/ lGI• �l D COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES My objection to the Ellis Condo/Apt.complex.It is OK to reject this development as the person wanting it did not research the project and is not in anyway appropriate for this location. Please be advised he or they admitted,in so many words,the project would likely be apartments. Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:18 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#184882 status has changed from new to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 8:14 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder#184882 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #185293 08/29/2019 Closed: 8/30 201 9 This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Billie Horowitz Email Posimage@aol.com SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None ❑x SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Meetlng Date: --- Please no more high density especially on small plots of land.The Beach and Ellis project will be a disaster.Traffic is already terrible at that corridor and we surely dont need more accidents. Agenda ReM No.: Status Changed:08/30/2019 9:56 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#185293 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Support Worker:08/30/2019 7:59 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#185293 has been assigned to Patty Esparza Share with Citizen:NO Status Changed:08/30/2019 7:59 AM Antonia Graham Work Order#185293 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Worker:08/30/2019 7:59 AM Antonia Graham Workorder*185293 has been assigned to Robin Estanislau. Share with Citizen:NO Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/30/2019 7:59 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#185293 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Thursday,August 29, 2019 4:16 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: New construction on Ellis at Beach AGENDA COMMENT -----Original Message----- From: Barbara Ilizaliturri <destiny34rb@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday,August 29, 2019 4:11 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: New construction on Ellis at Beach You must vote no on this proposal. I live at Newland and Ellis and the traffic is already impossible. Why do we need apartments so close together and why do we need all of this congestion? Think! This is not the right use of this property. Maybe something green, like grass would be better. It can't be solid buildings and cars. Barbara Ilizaliturri 714596-2108 Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee#ng Date: �/3! Agenda Item No., Cal f li-q/O 1 Work Order: #185038 08/29/2019 08/29201 9 This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Not Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Marily Kerr Email rowyourboat92648@ya hoo.com SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Moo"Date: I. Agenda Item No.: l/GI• Gll D COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES DENY Building permit for new HDD on Beach/Ellis.I live nearby,traffic is ridiculous getting thru that intersection takes several cycles as it is.The"Elan"monstrosity has made traffic worse and those exiting/entering the parking structure are cause for near accidents.More residents in that area is a recipe for disaster and potential law suits. Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:21 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#185038 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:11 AM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185038 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 8:11 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185038 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #185001 Opened: a 29/2019 Closed: 8/29 201 9 This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Not Yet Set Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By : Janice Kubica Email hbjan98@yahoo.com SUB TYPE Phone 714-465-9555 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Maedng oft: GI. 3. /157 Agenda IWn No., ;2 COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Building of New Ellis Avenue Apartments--It is bad enough the building across the street was built-RIDICULOUS!It would be a catastrophe if you even CONSIDER building this building! The traffic is already horrendous,there is NO PARKING(since these builders do not provide enough parking!)and there is not even enough room for this building!Haven't there been enough traffic accidents/deaths in that area already?Have some consideration for the people in Huntington Beach&not just for the money that goes into certain people's pockets! OUTLANDISH! Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:14 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#185001 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:11 AM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185001 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 8:11 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder*185001 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #184893 Opened:/ 19 Closed:/ 01 9 This issue is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Not Yet Set Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Larry McNeely Email lmwater@yahoo.com SUBTYPE Phone 714-421-8411 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None n SUPPLEMENTAL. COMMUNICATION Meeft Date: 0/,3//2 Agenda Rom No: - ':�IiA0 COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Metro Car Wash conversion the HDD,Vote NO.this 48 unit complex does not fit the character of our city.Our own planning commission denied it.It has only one inlet/outlet what if there was a huge fire and a accident blocking the only entrance?The community is sick and tired of the over development and the stack and pack tiny units stacked sky high.Do not let this developer shoe horn this into this area that is too small.VOTE NO Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:19 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#184893 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 8:13 AM Johanna Dombo Work Order#184893 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 8:13 AM Johanna Dombo Workorder#184893 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 11:04 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Sept 3 Vote on Proposed 4-Story Building at Ellis and Beach AGENDA COMMENT From: dnevin@verizon.net<dnevin@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 11:01 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Sept 3 Vote on Proposed 4-Story Building at Ellis and Beach August 30, 2019 Honorable Mayor and Council Members I am writing to you regarding the upcoming vote September 3 on the proposed construction of a 4-story, 48-unit residential building on the North East corner of Beach and Ellis. It is my understanding that the HB Planning Commission denied this proposal by a vote of 6-1. So now it is an appeal? Really? Then, maybe we don't need a Planning Commission. What purpose do they sere if their ruling can be overturned by the City Council? What do you know that they don't?And I mean this as a sincere question. The idea that one more monstrosity is proposed near Beach and Ellis should be a "no brainer." Developers come and go, and they have no interest in the City other than for their own gain. Why would this developer even think that this massive project could be a possibility near such a busy intersection and in such a tight space? Does the City have a lenient outlook for developers as opposed to looking out for residents? I sincerely hope not. I have lived in Huntington Beach more than 40 years. I am all for progress, but the number of massive residential buildings that have been approved and constructed in these last several years is off the charts. These new complexes greatly impact our resources as well as contribute to the challenging traffic on our streets. Now let's address Safety! We have an inordinate number of traffic accidents on Ellis. We are so impacted with traffic on Ellis that it is very difficult to exit our neighborhood and enter Ellis. For some, the absolutely ONLY WAY to enter/exit their neighborhoods is from Ellis. They have no choice! For neighbors, running a simple errand has become frustrating, time consuming, and dangerous. People using Ellis passing through are in a hurry, rude, take chances, and cause accidents. On Ellis, it is becoming a regular occurrence that one lane is shut down due to the work being done by some entity. This can affect a sizable backup and wait to cross Beach of several traffic light changes. Also, too many people use Ellis to travel to the freeway. The City has encouraged people to use Ellis by providing two left- turn lanes traveling south on Beach and turning East on Ellis. The only other intersection that does this is Beach and Edinger. We rely on our City officials to be diligent in their decisions to enhance our City while being concerned that those decisions are in the best interests of the residents. I am urging a NO vote on this proposed construction. If you want this project, please put it somewhere else. Thank you. SUPPLEMENTAL. Denise Nevin COMMUNICATION dnevin(c)verizon.net Meeting Date: i Agenda item No., I would also request a traffic study be completed on how Ellis could be improved to benefit all. This is how I see it currently being used: ✓ Enter/exit neighborhoods for residents ✓ Access to freeway for everyone ✓ Local access to shopping, doctors, etc ✓ Prohibited medium and large trucks—never cited by Police ✓ Motorcycles (noise abatement) ✓ First responders ✓ Repairs by a large variety of entities (electric, water, cable, etc.) ✓ Tree trimmers ✓ Street cleaners Work Order: #18 5110 08/29/2019 Closed: 8/29 201 9 I'llis issue is re.solved Est. ResolUtion Diit.e: Not Yet Set Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Althea Santucci Email SDM1830@gmail.com SUBTYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meting Date: !2/31i� Agenda Item No.• " COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Please do not allow the Ellis Ave Condo's/Apts to be approved.HDD at this site in particular is a bad location for additional HDD.The corner is already over traveled,has a lot of accidents and near misses with public transportation.Its over used.A smaller project(agreed would not be the best possible single location use)however its overarching impact at its current proposed size and scale would be a determent to the intersection.Thank you-please vote no. Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:46 PM Donna Switzer Work Order#185110 status has changed from assigned to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your comments will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Status Changed:08/29/2019 1:15 PM Johanna Dombo Work Order#185110 status has changed from new to assigned. Share with Citizen:YES Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/29/2019 1:15 PM Johanna Dombo Workorder#185110 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 11:53 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW:Agenda Item 21 19-910 oon Ellis and Beach Importance: High AGENDA COMMENT From: Gary Tarkington<garytarkington@msn.com> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 11:49 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Item 21 19-910 oon Ellis and Beach Importance: High City Council Members of Huntington Beach, The Metro Car Wash property conversion at Beach and Ellis is coming before you our city council. Our planning commission has Denied this project and the developer has appealed their well researched decision to not allow this. The developer is trying to shoehorn the 48 unit development on this small parcel with only one entrance/exit we the community has spoken NO MORE HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT. The plan does not fit and should be Denied. I am asking you to please keep your decision,that was already made once, DENIED!! Ann Tarkington Huntington Beach SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Agenda roam No.; Co�uTr�l u Ta SOT, 3, ZO/q 0-o- l City of Huntington Beach c IaE1.6c.02E •�s�vT) I File #: 19-758 MEETING DATE: 8/19/2019 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Dave Kiff, Interim City Manager PREPARED BY: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development Subject: Recommendation to open Public Hearing and continue to September 3, 2019 to consider the Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Ellis Ave. Condos) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042, a request to permit a one-lot subdivision and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial space and three levels of subterranean parking located at 8041 Ellis Avenue. Staff recommended approval of the project with suggested findings and conditions of approval to the Planning Commission. On June 11, 2019, the Planning Commission voted to deny the project. An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision was subsequently filed by the property owner, Tahir Salim, who has requested a continuance to the September 3, 2019, City Council meeting. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Open the public hearing and continue the appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Ellis Ave. Condos) to a date certain of September 3, 2019, at the applicant's request (Attachment No. 9). Alternative Action: Do not continue the item and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture, 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine, CA 92618 City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 4 Printed on 8/14/2019 File #: 19-758 MEETING DATE: 8/19/2019 Appel lant/P rope rty Owner: Tahir Salim, THDT Investment, Inc., 4740 Green River Road, Suite 304, Corona, CA 92880 Location: 8041 Ellis Avenue (North side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) A comprehensive description of the proposed project as well as a General Plan and Zoning conformance analysis can be found in the May 28, 2019, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No. 3). The staff report and attachments include the proposed site plan, floor plans, elevations, subdivision map, technical studies related to air quality, traffic, hydrology/water quality, and geological/soils, and written communications regarding the project. B. BACKGROUND On May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed project. Staff had recommended approval with reasons noted in Attachment #2. The property owner spoke in support of the project describing the benefits of redeveloping the underutilized and dilapidated site. Two members of the public spoke in opposition due to site access issues, small lot size for the proposed density, parking, traffic, and the existing supply of apartments within the City. The Planning Commission then deliberated and expressed concerns related to the required findings. Issues were raised regarding the proposed project's impact on Ellis Avenue traffic, shadows on adjacent properties, unsafe ingress/egress to the project site, increased U-turns at Patterson Lane, a small portion of the project devoted to commercial use, and marginal public open space. Ultimately, the Planning Commission directed staff to return with suggested findings for denial at the next regularly scheduled meeting of June 11, 2019. A full analysis of the required findings for both the proposed subdivision map and the proposed CUP is contained in the June 11, 2019, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No. 3). On June 11, 2019, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing and one speaker representing the applicant/property owner spoke in favor of the project. After deliberations, the Planning Commission denied the project, finding that the subdivision design is not consistent with the General Plan or the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) in that the project design fails to further a number of goals and policies contained within the General Plan and BECSP (Attachment No. 6). The Planning Commission also found that development of the proposed project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the type of development in that the site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of the BECSP by merging three existing lots into a single long and narrow 0.95 acre parcel. The long and narrow parcel is not physically suitable for the proposed mass, bulk, and intensity of the proposed four story mixed use project and does not complement the scale and proportion of surrounding one and two-story developments. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Avenue and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Boulevard. City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 4 Printed on 8/14/2019 powerel*3p Legistar,^^ File #: 19-758 MEETING DATE: 8/19/2019 Additionally, the Planning Commission found that approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the proposed project results in a density of approximately 50 dwelling units per acre while the adjacent residential property is built at an aggregate density of 13 dwelling units per acre. The Planning Commission was unable to make all of the required findings for a CUP, contained in Section 241.10(A) of the HBZSO, and denied the project. The Planning Commission found the project did not comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20 through 25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located in that the project does not further the vision of the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the BECSP, which envisions a vibrant commercial corridor within the Five Points District of the BECSP. The proposed project site is located within the Five Points District and does not further a vibrant commercial corridor because only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use, there is insufficient vehicular ingress and egress to the site, and the project proposes marginal public open space that does not contribute to the BECSP's vision of walkability and pedestrian connections between public and private property. Planning Commission Action on June 11, 2019 A motion was made by Grant, seconded by Kalmick, to deny Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 with findings carried by the following vote: AYES: Grant, Kalmick, Mandic, Perkins, Ray, Scandura NOES: Garcia ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None MOTION PASSED C. APPEAL: On June 20, 2019, the property owner, Tahir Salim, appealed the Planning Commission's denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157. and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Attachment No. 7). The appeal letter included the following reasons: 1. The Planning Commission's concerns about the project may instead become conditions of approval. 2. The Planning Commission denied the project for subjective reasons even though the project complied with the applicable development standards of SP14. 3. The project complies with the land use goals and policies including density, consolidation of parcels, and provides a range of housing to meet the needs of the City. The applicant's appeal also includes additional information for City Council consideration to address the Planning Commission's concerns related to project design and access. The applicant provided traffic control measures for right turn exit only, additional shadow analysis, and letters of support. The applicant requests the City Council consider the project and the supplemental information in City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 4 Printed on 8/14/2019 poweretZA,Legistari11 File #: 19-758 MEETING DATE: 8/19/2019 order to achieve a project design that complies with the applicable General Plan policies and required findings. Environmental Status: Pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, the proposed project is covered under the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan adopted Program EIR No. 08 -008. Implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EIR for the BECSP. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain high quality City services Attachment(s): 1. Findings for Denial of TTM No. 18157/ CUP No. 17-042 (PC action on 6/11/19) 2. Findings and Conditions of Approval for Approval of TTM No. 18157/ CUP No. 17-042 (as presented to PC on 5/28/19) 3. Project Plans (see Attachment No. 5 of Attachment No. 4 - May 28, 2019 PC Staff Report) 4. May 28, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report with Suggested Findings for Approval and Attachments 5. June 11, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report with Suggested Findings for Denial and Attachments 6. Notice of Action for TTM No. 18157/CUP No. 17-042 with Findings for Denial dated June 12, 2019 7. Appeal of Planning Commission Project Denial received June 20, 2019 8. Public Comments Regarding Appeal of Planning Commission Denial 9. Appellant's Request for Continuance received and dated August 6, 2019 City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 4 Printed on 8/14/2019 powered,LegistarTM City Council/ ACTION AGENDA August 19, 2019 Public Financing Authority the City of Huntington Beach and David Segura." Approved 6-0-1 (Delgleize-Absent) PUBLIC HEARING 20. 19-768 CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 WITH PUBLIC HEARING OPEN request to consider the Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Ellis Ave. Condos) Recommended Action: Open the public hearing and continue the appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (Ellis Ave. Condos) to a date certain of September 3, 2019, at the applicant's request (Attachment No. 9). Speakers(9) Approved 6-0-1 (Delgleize-Absent), to continue to September 3, 2019 with public hearing OPEN the request to consider the Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042(Ellis Ave. Condos). 21. 19-806 Approved General Plan Amendment No. 2019-001 by adopting Resolution No. 2019-50, Zoning Map Amendment No. 2018-001 by approving for introduction Ordinance 4184, and Zoning Text Amendment No. 2018-002 by approving for introduction Ordinance 4183 (Gothard Property & Research and Technology Zoning) Recommended Action: A) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 19-001 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 19-50, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 19-001." (Attachment 1); and, B) Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 18-001 with findings for approval and approving for introduction Ordinance No. 4184, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by changing the zoning designation from IG (Industrial General), IL (Industrial Limited), or CG (Commercial General) to RT (Research and Technology) on real property located in two existing industrial areas herein referred to as the Gothard Street Corridor and Northwest Industrial Area (Zoning Map Amendment No. 18-001)." (Attachments 2 and 3); and, C) Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 18-002 with findings for approval and approving for introduction Ordinance No. 4183, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending Chapters 204 Use Classifications, 212 Industrial Districts, and 231 Off-Street Parking and Loading of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (Zoning Text Amendment No. 18-002)." (Staff Recommended Action for public agency owned property) (Attachments 4 and 5); and, Items A-C Approved 5-0-2(Carr-Recuse(Out of Room);Delgleize-Absent) ATTACHMENT # 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, because the project is a mixed-use development that conforms with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan for which Program EIR No. 08-008 was adopted and implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EIR for the BECSP. Compliance with all applicable mitigation measures adopted for the Specific Plan will be required of the project. In light of the whole record, none of the circumstances described under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines are present and, therefore, no EIR or MND is required. The Project, located on the north side of Ellis Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Patterson Lane, consists of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 condominium residences with on- site public and private open space, a three level subterranean parking structure and 891 square feet of commercial space. The development site is located within the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) area. The City certified Program EIR No. 08-008 on December 8, 2009 and adopted the BECSP on March 1, 2010. In 2015, the City Council amended the BECSP to reduce the Maximum Amount of New Development to 2,100 total new dwelling units including 725 units on Beach Boulevard. There are 200 undeveloped units remaining within the MAND on Beach Boulevard. The 48 units contemplated by the project is within the total new dwelling units permitted on Beach Boulevard under the approved BECSP. The project conforms to all standards and regulations of the BECSP development code. Accordingly, no changes requiring revision of the previously certified Program EIR are proposed as part of the project, nor have any circumstances changed requiring revision of the previously certified Program EIR. In addition, no new information identifies that implementation of the BECSP, including the project, will have significant effects that were not discussed in the previously certified Program EIR or that the significant effects identified in the certified Program EIR will be substantially more severe than determined in the Program EIR. Nor is there new information showing that mitigation measures or alternatives not previously adopted would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL -TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 for the consolidation of three parcels into one 0.95 acre parcel is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The project does not comply with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan due to land use and circulation impacts. 2. The site is not physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed by the project. The site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of SP14 by merging three existing lots into a single 0.95 acre parcel. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre 126 site. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Ave. and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Blvd. 3. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public vehicular traffic. Vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. The project will not allow motorists exiting the project site to turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. will be required to make a u-turn at Patterson Ln. to access the site. Residents and visitors can not access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. without continuing past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a u-turn into the project site. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave. only, motorists who do not abide by this restriction due to frequent queuing on Ellis Ave. can create conflicts with eastbound Ellis Ave. traffic. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. The project is a four-story building that is incompatible with surrounding developments, including two-story older multi-family residences to the east and a car wash and restaurant to the west. 2. The proposed project is not consistent with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan which supports the use of the Five Points Center as a community retail center. The proposed project does not encourage the restructuring and revitalization of surrounding properties to enhance the market appeal of the Five Points District of the BECSP. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. 3. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will adversely affect the General Plan. The project is not consistent with the following objectives and policies of the General Plan: Land Use Element Goal LU-1: New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-1A: Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Policy LU-IC: Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-ID: Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. 127 Goal LU-2: New development preserves and enhances a distinct Surf City identity, culture, and character in neighborhoods, corridors, and centers. Policy LU-2B: Ensure that new and renovated structures and building architecture and site design are context-sensitive, creative, complementary of the city's beach culture, and compatible with surrounding development and public spaces. Policy LU-2C: Distinguish neighborhoods and subareas by character and appearance and strengthen physical and visual distinction, architecture, edge and entry treatment, landscape, streetscape, and other elements. Evaluate the potential for enhancement of neighborhood entrances and perimeter walls. Policy LU-2D: Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. Goal LU-3: Neighborhoods and attractions are connected and accessible to all residents, employees, and visitors. Policy LU-3A: Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. Policy LU-3C: Ensure connections are well maintained and safe for users. Goal LU-12: Commercial and industrial corridors throughout the planning area are renovated and revitalized. Policy LU-12B: Encourage renovation and revitalization of deteriorating and struggling nonresidential areas and corridors, particularly commercial locations. Circulation Element Goal CIRC-3a: Convenient and efficient connections between regional transit and areas of employment, shopping, recreation, and housing will increase ridership and active mobility, with a focus on first/last mile solutions. Goal CIRC-6: Connected, well-maintained, and well-designed sidewalks, bike lanes, equestrian paths, and waterways allow for both leisurely use and day-to-day required activities in a safe and efficient manner for all ages and abilities. The proposed development is not consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The BECSP encourages buildings to orient towards streets and provide enhancements to the pedestrian and public experience. Approximately five percent of the building length is oriented towards Ellis Ave.while the remainder is oriented to the adjacent residences to the east and commercial uses to the west. Further, the project architectural design and scale is not compatible with the vision of the BECSP. The adjacent properties will be impacted by the height and massing of the proposed project. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the Five Points District because only one percent of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. 128 The proposed project does not create continuity with new and existing development along the Beach Boulevard corridor. Beach Blvd. does not include a bikeway and existing bike facilities on Ellis Ave. terminate at the intersection with Beach Blvd. because the project does not propose to augment or expand the existing bikeways. Ingress and egress to the project site generate conflicts with the flow of traffic on Ellis Ave. There is no access or connectivity to the project site from Beach Blvd. Vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. The project will not allow motorists exiting the project site to turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. will be required to make a u-turn at Patterson Ln. to access the site. Residents and visitors can not access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. without continuing past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a u-turn on Ellis Ave. to access the project site. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave., motorists who do not abide by this restriction due to frequent queuing on Ellis Ave. can create conflicts with eastbound Ellis Ave. traffic. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION: The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 129 ATTAC H M E N T #2 SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, because the project is a mixed-use development that conforms with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan for which Program EIR No. 08-008 was adopted and implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EIR for the BECSP. Compliance with all applicable mitigation measures adopted for the Specific Plan will be required of the project. In light of the whole record, none of the circumstances described under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines are present and, therefore, no EIR or MND is required. The Project, located on the north side of Ellis Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Patterson Lane, consists of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 condominium residences with on- site public and private open space, a three level subterranean parking structure and 891 square feet of commercial space. The development site is located within the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) area. The City certified Program EIR No. 08-008 on December 8, 2009 and adopted the BECSP on March 1, 2010. In 2015, the City Council amended the BECSP to reduce the Maximum Amount of New Development to 2,100 total new dwelling units including 725 units on Beach Boulevard. There are 200 undeveloped units remaining within the MAND on Beach Boulevard. The 48 units contemplated by the project is within the total new dwelling units permitted on Beach Boulevard under the approved BECSP. The project conforms to all standards and regulations of the BECSP development code. Accordingly, no changes requiring revision of the previously certified Program EIR are proposed as part of the project, nor have any circumstances changed requiring revision of the previously certified Program EIR. In addition, no new information identifies that implementation of the BECSP, including the project, will have significant effects that were not discussed in the previously certified Program EIR or that the significant effects identified in the certified Program EIR will be substantially more severe than determined in the Program EIR. Nor is there new information showing that mitigation measures or alternatives not previously adopted would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 for the consolidation of three parcels into one 0.95 acre parcel is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of Mixed Use on the subject property. The project complies with all applicable code provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, and Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The project will result in the demolition of an existing commercial building, one dwelling unit, and a portion of a former car wash and facilitate the development of a mixed-use building permitted by code. The proposed subdivision is consistent with goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan Land Use Element that govern new subdivisions and residential development. 130 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development in that the project site is able to accommodate the type of development proposed from a public service, circulation, and drainage perspective. The site is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, which permits mixed-use buildings and residential uses within close proximity of commercial uses. The specific plan is a form-based code that does not rely on density to limit development, but rather the building form to create an attractive public experience appealing to pedestrians. By merging the three existing lots into one, the site will function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of the growing urban Beach Boulevard corridor. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the site has been previously used as a car wash, one dwelling unit, and a convenience store. The site does not contain any significant habitat for wildlife or fish. Design features of the project as well as compliance with the provisions of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan will ensure that the subdivision will not significantly impact the function and value of any resources adjacent to the project site. The project will comply with applicable mitigation measures pursuant to Program EIR No. 08- 008. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. Vehicular access is provided via a driveway along Ellis Avenue. The subdivision will provide all necessary street, sidewalk, and utility easements to serve the new subdivision. The project will dedicate four feet of land to widen the existing sidewalk (public right-of-way) along Ellis Avenue. The project will provide all necessary easements and will not affect any existing easements. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17- 042: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences, 891 sf. of retail space and associated infrastructure and site improvements will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood because as conditioned, the project will result in less than significant impacts related to traffic, noise, lighting, aesthetics, and privacy of adjacent residences. Existing multi-family residences adjacent to the east will be buffered from the project by an approximately 33 ft. 7 in. setback on the east side of the project site consisting of landscaping and a driveway. Residents of the project and the general public, including nearby residents, will benefit from the new commercial portion of the building and the public plaza. Based upon the conditions of approval and BECSP mitigation measures, the proposed project will not result in significant impacts onto adjacent properties in that the project complies with setbacks, onsite parking requirements, and allowable building height. The project is a four-story building that is compatible with surrounding developments in terms of architectural design and scale pursuant to the massing and scale requirements of the BECSP. The proposed mixed-use development will be compatible with the surrounding multi-family residential uses and commercial uses in terms of density, layout and overall design. With the conditions of 131 approval imposed, the project's grading and drainage pattern will result in compatible finished grades between adjacent properties. 2. The proposed project will comply with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) because the project complies with all other setback standards, building height, top and base architectural element requirements, and parking. 3. The General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject property is currently M-sp (Mixed Use — Specific Plan Overlay). Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences, 891 sf. of retail space and associated infrastructure and site improvements is consistent with this designation and the goals and policies of the City's General Plan as follows: Land Use Element Goal LU-1: New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-IA: Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Policy LU-18: Ensure new development supports the protection and maintenance of environmental and open spaces resources. Policy LU-1 C: Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-ID: Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. PolicV LU-2D: Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policy LU-3A: Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. Goal LU-4: A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Policy LU-4A: Encourage a mix of residential types to accommodate people with diverse housing needs. Policy LU-48: Improve options for people to live near work and public transit. 132 Goal LU-13: The city provides opportunities for new businesses and employees to ensure a high quality of life and thriving industry. Policy LU-13A: Encourage expansion of the range of goods and services provided to accommodate the needs of all residents and the market area. The proposed development is consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan which encourages buildings to orient towards streets, wider walkways, and large open space areas to enhance the pedestrian and public experience. Approximately 2,703 sq. ft. of public open space will be provided in a plaza accessible from Ellis Avenue. This area will be designed with enhanced landscaping, seating areas, and visually appealing amenities. The architecture of the building is contemporary, incorporating notches, major facade offsets, and facade composition changes to break up the massing of the building at street frontages. Brick veneer is applied along the base of the building with canopies at entrances to cater to the pedestrian scale. The facade skyline is then capped with parapets and articulating rooflines. Additionally, this mixed-use development will provide an on-site commercial component and is proposed within close proximity of new and existing commercial uses thus reducing the need for automobile use. By permitting a mix of land uses closer together, greater interaction will occur between developments and further the vision and viability of the BECSP. Housinq Element Policy 2.1 Variety of Housing Choices: Provide site opportunities for development of housing that responds to diverse community needs in terms of housing types, cost and location, emphasizing locations near services and transit that promote walkability. Policy 2.2 Residential Mixed Use: Facilitate the efficient use of land by allowing and encouraging commercial and residential uses on the same property in both horizontal and vertical mixed-use configurations. Policy 2.3 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan: Encourage and facilitate the provision of housing affordable to lower income households within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. Policy 6.4 Transportation Alternatives and Walkability: Incorporate transit and other transportation alternatives including walking and bicycling into the design of new development, particularly in areas within a half mile of designated transit stops. The suggested conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 would ensure that the project is developed in accordance with the proposed project narrative and guarantee that the project provides 5 onsite affordable housing 133 units. The project represents new housing in the City that will help to fulfill the City's share of the regional housing need. The proposed project would accommodate and is designed to appeal to different age groups and household types. A minimum of ten percent of the units are required to be designated for affordable housing. The project applicant proposes to provide five on-site affordable housing units in order to comply with the affordable housing requirement. Residents will benefit from the proximity of the project to different activities and uses. The project provides opportunities and convenience for many households to use alternate travel modes such as walking, bicycling, and public transit to complete their daily routines and run errands, thereby serving the need for affordable housing for this segment of the population. Circulation Element Goal CIRC-3a: Convenient and efficient connections between regional transit and areas of employment, shopping, recreation, and housing will increase ridership and active mobility, with a focus on first/last mile solutions. Goal CIRC-6: Connected, well-maintained, and well-designed sidewalks, bike lanes, equestrian paths, and waterways allow for both leisurely use and day-to- day required activities in a safe and efficient manner for all ages and abilities. Policy CIRC-6(C): Require new commercial and residential projects to integrate with pedestrian and bicycle networks, and that necessary land area is provided for the infrastructure. The proposed streetscape will create continuity with new and existing development along the Beach Boulevard corridor by providing a sidewalk with new landscaping to buffer pedestrians from the vehicular thoroughfare. Pedestrian connectivity is improved with landscaping and architectural elements through the proposed public open space and wider sidewalks. The project is serviced by an existing bus stop at the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Ellis Ave. and also provides bicycle parking in the subterranean parking structure to accommodate alternative methods of transportation. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 for consolidation of three existing parcels into a one-lot subdivision for a mixed-use 48 unit residential and 891 square feet commercial development received and dated April 23, 2019, shall be the approved layout, including the following: a. The existing 6-foot easement (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Public Utility Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed water quality basin or the proposed basin shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. b. The existing 20-foot easement, over existing Parcels 1 and 2 (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Ingress and Egress Purposes shall be 134 quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed building or the proposed building shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. 2. The Final Map for Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 shall not be approved by the City Council until Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 is approved and in effect. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and at least 14 days prior to any grading activity, the applicant/developer shall provide notice in writing to property owners of record and tenants of properties within a 500-foot radius of the project site as noticed for the public hearing. The notice shall include a general description of planned grading activities and an estimated timeline for commencement and completion of work and a contact person name with phone number. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, a copy of the notice and list of recipients shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 4. The following shall be shown as a dedication to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Tract Map (HBZSO 230.84 (A) & 253.10 (K)) (PW): a. A 4-foot right-of-way dedication for street purposes along the Ellis Avenue project frontage for a curb to property line width of 12 feet. (BECSP) 5. Prior to submittal of the Final Map and at least 90 days before City Council action on the Final Map, an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) shall be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Economic Development identifying three on-site units for- sale as affordable for persons and families of moderate income and two on-site units for- sale as affordable for persons and families of low income pursuant to Section 230.14 of the HBZSO. The AHA shall identify five on-site units for rent as affordable for persons and families of low income in the event the project is operated as rental apartment units. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council and shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The Agreement shall comply with HBZSO Sections 230.14 and 230.26 and include: i. A detailed description of the type, size and location of the five affordable housing for- sale units on-site. The mix of designated affordable one bedroom and two bedroom units shall be determined in the Agreement. ii. There shall be three on-site units for sale as affordable to persons and families of moderate income (up to 120% of the Orange County median income). There shall be two on-site units for sale as affordable to persons and families of low income (up to 80% of the Orange County median income). The Orange County median income is adjusted for appropriate household size. iii. In the event the project is operated as rental apartment units, the Agreement shall identify five on-site units for rent as affordable to persons and families of low income (up to 80% of the Orange County median income). The Orange County median income is adjusted for appropriate household size. iv. Continuous affordability provisions for a period of 45 years (for-sale units) and 55 years (rental units). Any required for-sale affordable units shall be owner-occupied (not rented or leased). 135 v. Provisions for the affordable units to be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project. Phasing and availability of the affordable units shall be concurrent with final approval (occupancy) of the first market rate residential unit(s), or contingent upon evidence of the applicant's reasonable progress towards attainment of completion of the affordable units. 6. Prior to submittal of the Final Map and at least 90 days before City Council action on the Final Map, CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and approved by the City Attorney. The CC&Rs shall identify: a. The common driveway access easements b. Maintenance of all walls, common landscape areas, and refuse management by the Homeowners' Association c. Management of the BMPs per the approved WQMP by the Homeowners' Association d. Management of the revised Parking Management Plan pursuant to CUP No. 17- 042 Condition No. 2 to ensure the ongoing control and availability of on-site parking. The CC&Rs must be in recordable form prior to recordation of the map. (HBZSO Section 253.12.11-11) 7. Comply with all applicable Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 conditions of approval. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17- 042: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 23, 2019 shall be the conceptually approved design with the following modifications: a. Depict the controlled access entry gate to the subterranean parking garage discussed in the Parking Management Plan. b. The proposed 10 ft. high perimeter block wall shall be revised to a maximum of 8 ft. high, including up to 2 ft. of retaining wall in accordance with Condition of Approval No. 6.a. 2. The Parking Management Plan dated April 22, 2019 shall be revised to include the following: a. Required parking shall be assigned to and reserved for each unit. Each unit shall be assigned two reserved parking spaces. b. The assigned residential parking spaces shall be provided with the rental of a dwelling unit without any additional cost. (HBZSO 231.18 (D)(2)) 3. Comply with all mitigation measures adopted for the project in conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 08-008 as specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Ellis Ave. Condos. 4. Block wall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences) consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. 136 Double walls shall be avoided to the greatest extent feasible. Applicant shall coordinate with adjacent property owners and make reasonable attempts to construct one common property line wall. If coordination between property owners cannot be accomplished, the applicant shall construct up to an eight (8') foot tall wall (including up to 2 ft. of retaining wall) located entirely within the subject property and with a two (2) inch maximum separation from the property line. The plans shall include some mechanism to close and secure any gaps. Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls located on the subject property. Plans shall depict any removal of walls on private residential property and construction of new common walls and sidewalls, and shall include approval by property owners of adjacent properties. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. 5. At least 14 days prior to any grading activity, the property owner/developer shall provide notice in writing to property owners of record and tenants of properties within a 500-foot radius of the project site as noticed for the public hearing. The notice shall include a general description of planned grading activities and an estimated timeline for commencement and completion of work and a contact person name with phone number. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, a copy of the notice and list of recipients shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the following shall be completed: a. The proposed drainage pattern and system shall be reevaluated to reduce potential grading impacts on the adjacent properties to the north, east, and west by incorporating localized collection points and result in a maximum two ft. grade differential and maximum two ft. high retaining wall. The retaining wall may be topped with a maximum six ft. high block wall. b. The existing 6-foot easement (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Public Utility Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed water quality basin or the proposed basin shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. (PW) c. The existing 20-foot easement over existing Parcels 1 and 2 (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Ingress and Egress Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed building. (PW) d. An interim parking and building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and Public Works Department. The property owner/developer shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. e. All design and construction shall be per the City Standard codes and street configuration and specifications of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The frontage along Ellis Avenue shall comply with the "Neighborhood Streets" configuration. 137 f. A lighting plan depicting the boulevard-scale street lighting and pedestrian-scale street lighting along Ellis Ave. shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval by the Planning Division and Public Works Department. 7. Prior to submittal for building,permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan and the processing fee to the Community Development Department for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. c. Contact the United States Postal Service for approval of mailbox location(s). d. One set of project plans revised pursuant to Condition No. 1 and one 8 '/2 inch by 11 inch set of all colored renderings, elevations, and materials sample and color palette, revised pursuant to Condition of Approvals and Code Requirements, shall be submitted for review, approval, and inclusion in the entitlement file, to the Planning Division. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall submit plans revised pursuant to Condition No. 1 to Republic Services for review. Proof of Republic Services approval shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. b. Submit a copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review, approval, and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Community Development Department. c. A Fire Master Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department. The Fire Master Plan shall include but is not limited to the following: i. Building locations, height and stories, addresses, and construction type; ii. Property dimensions or accurate scale; iii. Fire hydrant locations, public and private; iv. FDC locations; v. Fire sprinkler riser locations and location of system serving; vi. FACP locations; vii. Knox box and knox switch locations; viii. Gate locations, and opticoms if required; 138 ix. Fire lane locations, dimensions, lengths, turning radii at corners and circles/cu I-dee-sacs; x. Fire lane signage and striping. xi. The conceptual Alternative Materials and Methods Strategy shall be finalized to demonstrate compliance with exterior hose pull distance requirements. (FD) 9. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit, the following shall be completed: a. The proposed driveway approach on Ellis Avenue shall be constructed per Public Works Standard Plan No. 211. The driveway design shall include treatments for right-turn in/right-turn out only as specified by Public Works. This may include raised curb channelization, striping, and signage. (ZSO 230.84) b. The Developer shall provide a Landscape Maintenance License Agreement for the continuing maintenance and liability of all landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, furniture and hardscape that is located along the project frontage within the public right-of-way. The agreement shall describe all aspects of maintenance such as enhanced sidewalk cleaning, trash cans, disposal of trash, signs, tree or palm replacement and any other aspect of maintenance that is warranted by the development plan improvements proposed. The agreement shall state that the property ownership shall be responsible for all costs associated with the maintenance, repair, replacement, liability and fees imposed by the City. (PW) c. All existing overhead utilities that occur along the project's Ellis Avenue frontage shall be under-grounded. This includes the Southern California Edison (SCE) aerial distribution lines (12kV) and poles along the entire length of the westerly frontage of the subject project. This condition also applies to all utilities, including but not limited to all telephone, electric, and Cable TV lines. If require, easements shall be quitclaimed and/or new easements granted to the corresponding utility companies. (PW) 10. The use shall comply with the following: a. All ground floor entry points to residences shall be monitored by secured FOB type entries. (PD) 11. The developer or developer's representative shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 12. CUP No. 17-042 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of the final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Community Development Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 13. Incorporating sustainable or "green" building practices into the design of the proposed structures and associated site improvements is highly encouraged. Sustainable building practices may include (but are not limited to) those recommended by the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Program 139 certification (http://www.us bq corg/DisplayPage.aspx?CategorvlD=19) or Build It Green's Green Building Guidelines and Rating Systems (http://www.builditgreen.org/green-building- guidelines-rating). INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION: The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 140 ATTACHMENT #3 Attachment 3 - Project Plans See Attachment No. 5 of Attachment No. 4 on the May 28, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report ATTACHMENT #4 rP City of Huntington Beach I File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Community Development Director BY: Nicolle Aube, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 (ELLIS AVE. CONDOS) REQUEST: To permit a one-lot subdivision and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial space and three levels of subterranean parking and find the project exempt from CEQA. LOCATION: 8041 Ellis Avenue (North side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) APPLICANT: Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture, 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine, CA 92618 PROPERTY OWNER: Tahir Salim, THDT Investment, Inc., 1307 W. 6th Street, Suite 202, Corona, CA 92882 BUSINESS OWNER: N/A STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 1. Is the project proposal consistent with the City of Huntington Beach's adopted land use regulations (i.e. General Plan, Zoning Map and Zoning Code including the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan)? City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powered Legistarr"' File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 2. Does the project satisfy all the findings required for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit? 3. Has the appropriate level of environmental analysis appropriately identified all environmental impacts with appropriate mitigation? RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission take the following actions: A) Find the proposed project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457. B) Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 with suggested findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1). ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): A) Continue Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 and direct staff to return with findings for denial. B) Continue Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-04 and direct staff accordingly. PROJECT PROPOSAL: The project site is approximately 0.95 acres and consists of three parcels with two existing buildings - a liquor store and a residence. The existing buildings will be demolished in order to construct the proposed four-story building with three levels of subterranean parking. The north side of the project site was formerly utilized as part of the Metro Car Wash located at 18400 Beach Boulevard. Metro Car Wash has ceased operations and the owner of 18400 Beach Boulevard is currently constructing a new car wash on the property. The proposed condominium project and new car wash do not have any overlapping elements and are entirely separate projects. According to the Applicant's narrative (Attachment No. 3), the project owner intends for the units to be sold to individual buyers as condominiums so there will be no permanent on-site staff. Building maintenance, regular up-keep, and cleaning will be handled by the HOA management team via contracts with local services. The project owner proposes to provide five affordable units on-site in order to comply with the Affordable Housing requirement. In the event the project is operated as rental apartment units, five on-site units will be designated as rentals affordable to low income households. Background: 1. In 2010, the City adopted the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (SP14). The goal of City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 poweret4q,Legistar," File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 SP14 was to transform the current development of commercial strip centers lined with surface parking lots and generally low-rise commercial buildings to a pattern of centers and segments characterized with clusters of shops and activity of varying intensity. These new active areas would include a mix of residential, offices, and commercial uses oriented to alternative modes of transportation including walking and bicycling. Along the Beach Boulevard corridor near Ellis Avenue, the development of a "Town-Center Neighborhood" segment would feature the City's widest range of contemporary housing types and possibly a wide mixture of uses. 2. In 2015, the City Council amended SP14 to decrease the total number of residential units allowed from 4,500 to 2,100, increase setbacks, increase minimum parking standards, require upper story setbacks, require a commercial component in all residential buildings, and permit residential subject to approval of a CUP. Other amendments related to auto dealers and civic and cultural uses were also approved. Out of the 2,100 Maximum Amount of New Development (MAND) units currently permitted, approximately 1,900 have been constructed leaving a balance of 200 units. Study Session: The Planning Commission held a Study Session on May 14, 2019 and discussed the following issues: General Solar panels on adjacent properties The Planning Commission discussed the potential impact of the project on adjacent properties to the east that have rooftop solar panels. The applicant has provided a shadow analysis exhibit (Attachment No. 6). Per the exhibit, the adjacent buildings to the east may experience shade/shadow beginning at approximately 6:00 PM during the summer months, approximately 4:00 PM during the fall months, and approximately 3:30 PM during the winter months. Distance of the project site from the intersection The proposed project site is approximately 96 ft. from the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Ellis Ave. Pets At this time, the applicant has not provided information regarding pets at the property. Comparable projects The Planning Commission requested a list of comparable projects. Staff has prepared an exhibit of comparable completed projects within SP14 (Attachment No. 7). Revised site plan for clarity The Planning Commission requested a revised site plan exhibit which removes the utilities and other layers in order to depict the property lines, setbacks, etc. more clearly. The applicant has prepared a revised site plan to fulfill this request (Attachment No. 8). Environmental Artifacts on the project site Since the project site has been previously disturbed and developed, it is not likely that construction of City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powered,LegistarTM File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 the proposed project will result in discovery of cultural resources. Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 08-008 for BECSP included a Cultural and Paleontological Resources survey of the entire SP14 area. Two archeological sites were identified within the SP14 area and are labeled as CA-ORA-296 and CA-ORA-358. CA-ORA-296 is located on the west side of Newland Ave. between Slater Ave. and Talbert Ave. CA-ORA-358 is located on the corner of Indianapolis Ave. and Beach Blvd. Neither of these sites are within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project. Although there are no archeological sites near the project, the project will comply with BECSP MM 4.4 regarding Cultural and Paleontological Resources. For example, in the event that native soil is disturbed, an archeology professional will be retained to determine if a substantial adverse change would occur to an archeological resource. Acoustic study The Planning Commission asked why the Acoustic Study is not required to be submitted prior to project approval. The BECSP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program includes Mitigation Measure 4.9-5 which requires an acoustic study to be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. The acoustic study will present an analysis of the potential noise impacts of the surrounding environment on exterior (ex: patios and balconies) and interior components of the proposed project. MM 4.9-5 includes a provision that requires final project design to incorporate special design measures in the construction of the proposed residential units, if necessary. Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (SP14) Zoning Pre-2010 Prior to the 2010 adoption of SP14, the property had a General Plan Land Use designation of CG - F2 - d (Commercial General - Flood Overlay - design overlay) and a Zoning designation of CG (General Commercial). Did SP14 envision narrow lot development or unconsolidated development? SP14 divides the Beach Blvd. and Edinger Ave. corridors into five general areas or segments. The overall vision for SP14 is to develop primarily residential and neighborhood retail uses in the southern portion of Beach Boulevard, transitioning to mixed uses in the middle segment of Beach Boulevard, then to a more dense "town center" adjacent to and at the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue, and extending along Edinger Avenue. Geographically, the intention is to intensify land uses as one travels north along Beach Boulevard from the southern boundary of the SP area. The project site is within the Five Points district of SP14, which is envisioned to enable investment in a visible, mixed-use cluster at this central location. SP14 discusses infill development on underutilized properties responding to the broad framework of the Specific Plan which will contribute to an emerging pattern of coherent arrangements of buildings, streets, and blocks. Although it might be ideal for clusters of small properties to consolidate and propose a unified project, it is not always possible due to market conditions and the interests of individual property owners. This is contemplated in the SP14 Development Concept which states that the common purpose of development within the Specific Plan is the realization of a vision of the future that is sufficiently specific to meet the revitalization goals, yet loose enough to respond to opportunities and changes in the marketplace that will inevitably arise. City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 poweretA+ ,LealstarTI File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 Traffic Impacts, Traffic Improvements, and Grading Required Dedications The Public Works Department has indicated that the only dedication the project requires is a four foot dedication along Ellis Ave. Traffic Mitigation The Public Works Department has indicated that payment of fair share traffic fees and implementation of a right in, right out only driveway along with on-street striping and driveway improvements to supplement the right in/out only movements are the required traffic mitigations. The project does not result in other traffic related impacts requiring mitigation. Also, the Planning Commission requested information regarding Level of Service (LOS) in the project vicinity. LOS is a method of describing the delays experienced by drivers at a particular intersection or roadway. If a project is determined to create a significant traffic delay, it may impact and downgrade the LOS rating. The Traffic Impact Analysis finds that the proposed project driveway is forecast to operate at acceptable LOS B during the AM and PM peak hours for Year 2020 traffic conditions. LOS B is defined as 0.61 - 0.70 seconds of delay and is described as a very good traffic condition with short delays. It must be noted that although the level of service calculation indicates LOS B operations at the project driveway, residents of the project may experience delays entering/exiting the project site due to vehicle queueing on Ellis Ave. The Public Works Department has prepared a summary of volume to capacity ratio at AM/PM Peak Hours in the project vicinity (Attachment No. 11). Will payment of fees at "full buildout"of SP14 cover all needs for traffic? The Public Works Department has indicated that collection of the fair share payment is sufficient to mitigate all the identified intersection improvements of the Specific Plan. Description of all traffic requirements for the project The Public Works Department has indicated that the following items are required related to traffic and street improvements: BECSP EIR Transportation/Traffic Mitigation Measures (by payment of fair share traffic impact fees), BECSP Streetscape Improvement Development Standards (four ft. dedication), CP Circulation Element and PW standards (with implementation of right in/out driveway, on-street striping, and driveway improvements). North side grading The preliminary grading plan (Attachment No. 12) depicts the subject site with a grade of approximately 6.6 ft. for drainage purposes with a 6.6 ft. high retaining wall. The six ft. grade is proposed as the highest point with a gradual reduction in grade to approximately three to four ft. near the subterranean garage entrance. Staff recommends a condition of approval (Attachment No. 1) to require the proposed drainage pattern and system to be revised prior to issuance of a grading permit to reduce retaining wall and grade differential impacts to adjacent properties to the north, east, and west. Staff recommends a maximum two ft. retaining wall may be constructed and topped with a maximum six ft. high block wall. What (if any) grading or construction activities can occur outside of 10 AM - 4 PM? What time can City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powerelA4 LeaistarT1i1 File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 they start grading? Public Works Code Requirements for the project limit the hours of hauling trucks at the site from 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M., Monday - Friday only. The BECSP Mitigation Measures limit high noise-producing activities to the hours of 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. Fire Access Ladder pads Per the Huntington Beach Fire Department, all bedroom windows are required to be accessible from ground ladders. The applicant has provided HBFD with plans that show the ladder pads for ground ladder access to egress windows. Elan Statistics on increased accidents due to Elan The Public Works Department has provided information regarding accident rates at three intersections in the project vicinity three years prior to occupancy of the Elan building and three years after the occupancy of the Elan building (Attachment No. 9). The analysis concludes that accidents after the occupancy of Elan have decreased compared to the rate of accidents prior to the occupancy of Elan. Comparison of the proposed project to Elan On May 15, 2012 the Planning Commission approved Site Plan Review No. 12-001 (Elan) to develop a mixed use project consisting of 274 residential units including six live-work units, 8,500 square feet of commercial space, an internal 430 space parking garage and 54,546 sf of private and public open space on a 2.74 acre site. The Planning Commission requested a comparison chart of the proposed project to Elan. It must be noted that Elan was approved prior to the 2015 BECSP Amendments which included the following revisions to topics relevant to Elan and the proposed project: • Reduce the residential Maximum Amount of Net New Development (MAND) from 4,500 units to 2,100 units • Require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for all residential and mixed use (residential/commercial) projects • Increase the residential parking requirements • Increase front yard setbacks on all public streets • Limit maximum building height to four stories • Create an upper-story setback above the third floor • Require all residential projects to include retail/commercial uses at the street level Provision Elan Proposed Project Number of Units 274 48 Density 100 units per acre 50 units per acre Height Ellis Ave.: ranges from 4-6 stories 4 stories 46 ft. to the highest point 4th story: 43 ft. high 6th story: 63 ft. 6 in. high City of Huntington Beach Page 6 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powereWy LegistarW File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 Setbacks Ellis Ave.: 0 ft. 2 in. Ellis Ave.: 30 ft. Upper story setback: 11 ft. 1 in. setback along front and sides of building for a depth of 101 ft. 10 in. on the 4th floor Parking 1-2 spaces per unit 2.5 spaces per unit The Planning Commission also asked for information regarding trip generation rates for the proposed project compared to Elan. The Public Works Department has prepared a trip generation analysis comparison for both projects (Attachment No. 10). ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Sub"ect Prox)ertv And Surroundinq General Plan Desi nations Zoning And Land Uses: LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING LAND USE Subject Property: M-sp (Mixed-Use - SP14 (Beach Edinger Convenience store Specific Plan Overlay) Corridor Specific Plan) and one residence North of Subject M-sp (Mixed-Use - SP14 (Beach Edinger Hotel and commercial Property: Specific Plan Overlay) Corridor Specific Plan) shopping center East of Subject RM (Residential RM (Residential Medium Multi-family housing Property: Medium Density) Density) South of Subject M-sp (Mixed-Use - SP14 (Beach Edinger Mixed-use retail and Property: Specific Plan Overlay) Corridor Specific Plan) multi-family housing (Elan) West of Subject M-sp (Mixed-Use - SP14 (Beach Edinger Drive-through Property: Specific Plan Overlay) Corridor Specific Plan) restaurant and car wash (under construction) General Plan Conformance: The General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject property is Mixed Use - Specific Plan Overlay. The proposed project is consistent with this designation and the goals and policies of the City's General Plan as follows: A. Land Use Element Goal LU-1: New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-IA: Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Policy LU-18: Ensure new development supports the protection and maintenance of environmental and open spaces resources. City of Huntington Beach Page 7 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 poweret4� Leoistar l File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 Policy LU-1 C: Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-ID: Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Policy LU-2D_ Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policy LU-3A: Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. Goal LU-4: A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Policy LU-4A: Encourage a mix of residential types to accommodate people with diverse housing needs. Policy LU-48: Improve options for people to live near work and public transit. Goal LU-13: The city provides opportunities for new businesses and employees to ensure a high quality of life and thriving industry. Policy LU-13A: Encourage expansion of the range of goods and services provided to accommodate the needs of all residents and the market area. The proposed mixed-use development is consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan which encourages buildings to orient towards streets, wider walkways, and large open space areas to enhance the pedestrian and public experience. Approximately 2,703 sq. ft. of public open space will be provided in a plaza accessible from Ellis Avenue. This area will be designed with enhanced landscaping, seating areas, and visually appealing amenities. The architecture of the building is contemporary, incorporating notches, major fagade offsets, and fagade composition changes to break up the massing of the building at street frontages. Brick veneer is applied along the base of the building with canopies at entrances to cater to the pedestrian scale. The fagade skyline is then capped with parapets and articulating rooflines. Additionally, this mixed-use development will provide an on-site commercial component and is proposed within close proximity of new and existing commercial uses thus reducing the need for automobile use. By permitting a mix of land uses closer together, greater interaction will occur between developments and further the vision and viability of the BECSP. B. Housinq Element Policy 2.1 Variety of Housing Choices: Provide site opportunities for development of housing that responds to diverse community needs in terms of housing types, cost and location, emphasizing locations near services and transit that promote walkability. Policy 2.2 Residential Mixed Use: Facilitate the efficient use of land by allowing and City of Huntington Beach Page 8 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powered,Legistar-` File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 encouraging commercial and residential uses on the same property in both horizontal and vertical mixed-use configurations. Policy 2.3 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan: Encourage and facilitate the provision of housing affordable to lower income households within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. Policy 6.4 Transportation Alternatives and Walkability: Incorporate transit and other transportation alternatives including walking and bicycling into the design of new development, particularly in areas within a half mile of designated transit stops. The project includes six one-bedroom units and forty-two two-bedroom units that would accommodate and is designed to appeal to different age groups and household types. The units range from 645 - 880 sf. The proposed project will help to fulfill the City's share of the regional housing need by providing smaller dwelling units which will be more financially attainable by virtue of size. A minimum of ten percent of the units are required to be designated for affordable housing. The project applicant proposes to provide five on-site affordable housing units in order to comply with the affordable housing requirement. Residents will benefit from the proximity of the project to different activities and uses. The project provides opportunities and convenience for many households to use alternate travel modes such as walking, bicycling, and public transit to complete their daily routines and run errands, thereby serving the need for affordable housing for this segment of the population. C. Circulation Element Goal CIRC-3a: Convenient and efficient connections between regional transit and areas of employment, shopping, recreation, and housing will increase ridership and active mobility, with a focus on first/last mile solutions. Goal CIRC-6: Connected, well-maintained, and well-designed sidewalks, bike lanes, equestrian paths, and waterways allow for both leisurely use and day-to-day required activities in a safe and efficient manner for all ages and abilities. Policy CIRC-6(C)_ Require new commercial and residential projects to integrate with pedestrian and bicycle networks, and that necessary land area is provided for the infrastructure. Although the site is relatively narrow, the proposed streetscape will create continuity with new and existing development along the Beach Boulevard corridor by providing a sidewalk with new landscaping to buffer pedestrians from the vehicular thoroughfare. Pedestrian connectivity is improved with landscaping and architectural elements through the proposed public open space and wider sidewalks. The project is serviced by an existing bus stop at the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Ellis Ave. and also provides bicycle parking in the underground parking structure to accommodate alternative methods of transportation. Zoning Compliance: The proposed project is located within Specific Plan No. 14 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan and complies with the requirements of the Town Center Neighborhood Segment. The purpose City of Huntington Beach Page 9 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 poweret'5Q Legistar`1 File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 of the BECSP is to enhance the overall economic performance, physical beauty and functionality of the Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue Corridors. Future development would transform existing commercial strips, which are predominantly lined with large expanses of pavement or underperforming uses, to a pattern of centers and segments generating increased activity and greater interaction between developments. As previously mentioned, the project site is located in the Town Center Neighborhood segment of the Five Points District within the BECSP. The Five Points District is designated as a potential City center characterized by convenience and urban vitality. Development within the Town Center Neighborhood segment is encouraged to be revitalized through infill development on underutilized properties. This segment is envisioned to have greater development intensity than surrounding segments, including new apartments or condominiums with shopfronts and parking areas screened from view. Development is to be more compact in this segment in order to provide the activity expected in a vibrant urban district. The table below shows an overview of the project's conformance to the significant development standards of the BECSP. In addition, a list of City Code Requirements of the applicable provisions of the BECSP and the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) and Municipal Code has been provided to the applicant and attached to this report (Attachment No. 19) for informational purposes only. Provision Town Center Proposed Project Neighborhood 2.2 Use Regulations Multi-family residential 42 - 2 bedroom units 6 - 1 Commercial one bedroom units 891 sf commercial retail 2.2.2 Special Retail n/a n/a Configuration 2.2.3 Affordable Housing Required - 10% of the 5 affordable units to be proposed 48 units 4.8 units constructed on-site required 2.3.1 & 2.3.2 Height Min. 2 story/ Max. 4 stories 4 stories 14 ft. retail ceiling Ground floor retail - 14 ft. 450 slope complies min. floor to ceiling Adjacent to housing 2.3.3 Building Length Max. 300 ft. 54 ft. max 2.3.4 Special Building Limited mid-block building - 54 ft. Length max. 80 ft. 2.3.5 Building Massing All other streets - 1 L:3H to Complies with massing 3L:1 H range 2.4.1 Building Orientation Orientation to street required Building oriented to Ellis Ave. City of Huntington Beach Page 10 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powerel5lj LegistarTM File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 2.4.2 Private Frontage Various types including Ellis Ave. elevation: shopfront, corner entry, Shopfront - 24 ft. long common lobby, etc. Internal elevation: Common Lobby Entry 2.4.3 Front Setback All other streets - min. 30 ft. 30 ft. 4th floor: 11 ft. 1 in. Upper story setback - 10 ft. setback for a depth of 101 ft. along front and sides of a 10 in. building for a depth of minimum 100 ft. for structures above the 3rd floor 2.4.4 Side Setback Min. w/living space windows West side: 10 ft. East side: - loft. 33 ft. 7 in. 2.4.5 Rear Yard Setback Min. 10 ft. 15 ft. 7 in. 2.4.6 Alley Setback n/a n/a 2.4.7 Frontage Coverage n/a n/a 2.4.8 Space Between n/a n/a Buildings 2.4.9 Build-to-Corner n/a n/a 2.5.1 Improvements to Neighborhood Streets 12 ft. total 6 ft. wide planter Existing Streets required - 12 ft. total 6 ft. wide sidewalk including 6 ft. wide planter and 6 ft. wide sidewalk 2.5.2 Provision of New n/a n/a Streets 2.5.3 Block Size n/a n/a 2.5.4 Street Connectivity n/a n/a 2.5.5 Required East-West n/a n/a Street Connection 2.5.6 Residential n/a n/a Transition-Boundary Street 2.5.7 Street Types n/a n/a 2.6.1 Provision of Public Residential - min.50 sf. per 2,703 sf. Open Space unit = 2,400 sf. Retail - min. 50 sf. per 1,000 sf. = 44.5 sf. 2,444.5 sf. required 2.6.2 Special Public Open n/a n/a Space City of Huntington Beach Page 11 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 poweret54 Leg(star File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 2.6.3 Provision of Private Residential - 60 sf. per unit 4 (1 br) = 244 sf. 32 (2 br) _ Open Space x 48 total units = 2,880 sf. 2,976 sf. Roof deck = 3,281 sf. Total: 6,501 sf. (First floor units excluded from private open space calculation due to noncompliant porch type) 2.6.4 Public Open Space Provide either: Park, Linear Plaza Types Green, Square, Plaza, Mid- Block Green, Courtyard Plaza, Passage/Paseo, or Pocket Park/Playground 2.6.5 Private Open Space Provide either: Courtyard, 1st floor units - noncompliant Types Private Yard, Rooftop Deck porch (excluded from private or Garden, or Balcony open space calculations) 2 nd - 4th floor units - balconies 4th floor - rooftop deck 2.6.6 Stormwater Best Management Practices Provided - WQMP required Management required to ensure compliance 2.6.7 Stormwater BMP Source Control BMPs, Site Provided - WQMP required Types Design BMPs, Treatment to ensure compliance Control BMPs 2.6.8 Open Space Required Public plaza furniture Landscaping Decorative stamped concrete paving treatment 2.6.9 Setback Area Perimeter Block Setback Sidewalk extension Landscaping Types Area -Sidewalk extension provided : decorative required with Shopfront: stamped concrete paving to paving material consistent provide continuity with the public right-of-way w/sidewalk Side and rear Interior Block Setback Area -yards landscaped with Groundcover required: cove shrubs, trees, and side and rear yard areas groundcover with landscaping or other pervious surfaces 2.7.1 Provision of Parking Residential: 1 bedroom @ 2 Residential: 1 bedroom = 12 min/unit (6 units x 2 = 12 spaces provided 2 bedroom required) 2 bedroom @ 2 = 84 spaces provided Guest min/unit (42 units x 2 = 84 = 24 spaces provided Retail required) Guest = 0.5 min/1 = 5 spaces provided Total: units (48 units x 0.5 = 24 125 spaces required 128 required) Retail: 5/1000 sf. spaces provided (891 sf. proposed) x (5/1000) = 4 spaces required City of Huntington Beach Page 12 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powere'15�,LegistarT11 File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 2.7.2 Parking Types Permitted as: Surface Lot: Three level Underground rear Structure: wrapped Structure proposed ground level, wrapped all levels, partially submerged podium, underground structure 2.8.1 Fagade Regulations Top and Base - required Top: metal trim cornices and varied roofline Base: brick veneer at retail and residential frontages BECSP Conformance The proposed project is consistent with the intent of the Town Center Neighborhood segment of the BECSP as stated above and overall objective of the BECSP to improve the vitality of the Beach Boulevard corridor by providing 48 residential units to support the commercial opportunities existing and anticipated in the vicinity. The project also includes 891 sf. of commercial space to serve residents of the project and nearby neighborhoods. The project site is also within close proximity to other key developments including Five Points Plaza and Elan, which provide the commercial and public services that the proposed development will support. The urban environment will further form when there is sufficient supporting residential uses to accommodate the growing commercial uses. Alternate modes of travel such as walking and bicycling become more appealing when enhanced larger walkways are provided and integrated between developments. Proposed site improvements will provide wider pedestrian sidewalks throughout the project and an open public plaza. As discussed under the Zoning Conformance section of this report, the project complies with the BECSP development code and does not include any requests to deviate from the development standards. Adequate emergency access is provided in and around the site with the driveway from Ellis Ave., also functioning as the fire lane. Sufficient parking (exceeds code requirements) for the residential and commercial portion of the project is incorporated in a subterranean parking structure which supports the BECSP vision for quality urban spaces. The project is within the allowable MAND in the BECSP. As of the 2015 BECSP amendment, the Beach Boulevard corridor has 525 dwelling units approved of which 325 dwelling units have been constructed. There is a remaining capacity of 200 units in the Beach Boulevard corridor. The Beach Boulevard corridor also has a MAND of 532,000 sf. for retail development. The proposed project includes 891 sf. of retail space and 48 dwelling units, which do not exceed the Beach Boulevard corridor MAND. Building Massing and Scale The BECSP relies on massing and scale to dictate the desired building form and interaction with the public experience. As the building expands horizontally, the height of the building is vertically proportioned for orientation to the pedestrian environment. The flat plane of the fagade is then City of Huntington Beach Page 13 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powereli$4,Legistar 11 File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 separated into volumes accented with insets, offsets, notches, material and colors changes. For the proposed design, the building facades incorporate a variety of attractive elements. The dominant treatment along the exterior base involves brick veneer as well as the placement of metal trellises and canopies on the ground floor building entrances. The top element of the facades applies cornices and varied rooflines. Inset balconies and intermittent setbacks combine with rich landscaping to beautify the street frontages creating an inviting pedestrian and public space. The maximum allowable height for the subject site is four stories. The proposed building is four stories high and 46 ft. tall at the highest point of the building cornice. As seen along the Ellis Ave. frontage, the height is articulated from the pedestrian scale featuring a 20 ft. high retail portion of the building and a notch at the residential entrance. The facades facing Beach Blvd. (west) and Patterson Ln. (east) are further articulated with the addition of metal trellises and open railings on third and fourth floor balconies. The pedestrian bridge provides architectural relief and reduces visual massing via transmission of light and air through the building frontage. Land Use Compatibility The proposed four-story mixed-use development is compatible with existing and anticipated land uses in the immediate vicinity. This includes the mixed-use Elan building which ranges in height from 4-6 stories on Ellis Ave. and is also composed of a mixture of commercial and residential land uses. The project will be served by the existing commercial uses to the north, west, and south (Elan) of the project site. Existing multi-family residential uses are located east of the site and existing single family residential uses are located further east, beyond Patterson Ln. The project will not significantly impact existing residential uses because the proposed building is located approximately 260 feet away from the nearest single family residential building. Existing multi-family residences are buffered from the proposed commercial use through perimeter setback areas of landscaping, sidewalks, and a driveway. Interior noise would be minimized through noise attenuation features. Development of the site would enhance the visual image of the Beach Boulevard corridor and expand the vision of the specific plan. Site Layout & Circulation Access Vehicular access to the project site is proposed via one primary entry point on Ellis Avenue. There are no improvements necessary to the existing street or medians to accommodate vehicular access to the project site. The driveway on Ellis Ave. is designed with two-way travel lanes which provide entrance into the subterranean parking structure. The project will enhance the pedestrian experience on Ellis Ave. by dedicating four ft. of property to provide a 12 ft. wide public right-of-way. Pedestrian access to the project site will feature a six ft. wide planter along the street frontage which buffers the adjacent six ft. wide sidewalk. The sidewalk along Ellis Ave. is also adjacent to the proposed public plaza. The building is oriented towards the street which connects the sidewalk to the shopfront retail entrance and the common lobby residential entrance along Ellis Ave. Interior corridors connect the residential units to the parking garage and roof deck via stairs/elevators. The sidewalk connects to a pathway which provides access to the ground floor residential entrance and pedestrian security gates. The security gates will enclose the residential area from the public open space through controlled access scan cards. City of Huntington Beach Page 14 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powere `7t�,LegistarTI File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 The project's access points have been designed to comply with the requirements of the BECSP and respond to the Fire Department's request for emergency access. The site includes a fire truck turnabout and marked fire lanes. The project has proposed an Alternate Means & Methods (AM&M) strategy to satisfy exterior hose pull distance requirements. The AM&M has been reviewed and conceptually approved by the HBFD. Open Space The 2,703 sf. public open space plaza is accessible via the public sidewalk on Ellis Ave. and visible along the street frontage. The plaza includes seating areas for public use and decorative stamped concrete pathways which encourages public use from the sidewalk. The inclusion of these improvements creates an inviting pedestrian experience for both visitors and residents. The project proposes porches as private open space for the ground floor residential units. Although each of the ground floor residents will benefit from the enjoyment of open space accessible directly from their unit, the porch type private open space is noncompliant with the Town Center Neighborhood segment of BECSP. For this reason, the ground floor porches are excluded from private open space calculations for the project. All residents will have access to the fourth floor roof deck common area. Units on the fourth floor also have private balconies which are separate from the common area. Parking The 2015 amendments to the BECSP increased the parking ratio requirements from the original 2010 adoption of the BECSP. The proposed project meets and exceeds the minimum amount of required vehicle parking based on the current BECSP. A total of 125 parking spaces are required for the project and a total of 128 parking spaces are provided. The project provides 120 parking spaces for residences, including 24 spaces reserved for guests, and 5 spaces reserved for the retail tenant. The subterranean parking structure will provide access to all 128 parking spaces. According to the Parking Management Plan (Attachment No. 13), the parking garage will remain open between the hours of 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM and require a scan card for gate access outside these hours. Affordable Housing As required per the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) and Huntington Beach -Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Section 230.26 - Affordable Housing, 10% of the proposed units are required to be designated for sale at affordable income levels. Thus, 4.8 of the proposed 48 units are required to be designated for sale at affordable income levels. The applicant proposes to provide five affordable units on-site in order to comply with the Affordable Housing requirement. Three of the affordable units will be made available to moderate income households and two affordable units will be available to low income households, as defined by HBZSO Section 230.26(B)(3). In the event the project is operated as rental apartment units, five on-site units will be designated as rentals affordable to low income households, as defined by HBZSO Section 230.26(B) (2). In addition, there are requirements for a 45-year affordability period (for-sale units) and 55-year affordability period (rental units) and the timing for which the affordable units shall be constructed. The suggested conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 stipulates these requirements to be recorded in an Affordable Housing Agreement approved by the City Council. Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: City of Huntington Beach Page 15 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powered LegistarT1 File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 The project is required to comply with the architectural regulations and guidelines of the BECSP. A detailed discussion of the project's design is provided in the Analysis section of this staff report. Environmental Status: On December 8, 2009, the Planning Commission certified Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 08-008 for the proposed Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. EIR No. 08-008 concluded that potential impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the exception of impacts to air quality, cultural resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities and service systems, which would remain significant and unavoidable. The Planning Commission certified EIR No. 08-008 as adequate and complete with modified mitigation measures, findings of fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City Council also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to action on the GPA, ZMA, and ZTA on March 1, 2010. The project applicant has completed Air Quality/GHG Analysis, Traffic Impact Analysis, Preliminary Hydrology Report/WQMP, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), and a Geotechnical Investigation (Attachments No. 17) to ensure the project will comply with the BECSP Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program. All potentially significant effects of the project have been analyzed pursuant to the BECSP Program EIR and can be mitigated pursuant to applicable mitigation measures adopted for the BECSP Program EIR (Attachment No. 15). Therefore, pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project is covered under the program EIR and no further environmental analysis is required. Coastal Status: Not Applicable. Design Review Board: Not Applicable. Subdivision Committee: Not Applicable. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: The Departments of Public Works, Fire, Building, Economic Development, and Police have reviewed the proposed development project. Recommended conditions from the Departments of Public Works, Fire, Building and Police are incorporated into the suggested conditions of approval and code requirements have also been identified. Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach Wave on May 16, 2019, and notices were sent to property owners of record and occupants within a 500 ft. radius of the subject property, individuals/organizations requesting notification (Community Development Department's Notification Matrix), and applicant. Written communications received prior to the May 28, 2019 Planning Commission meeting will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration (Attachment No. 16). Application Processing Dates: City of Huntington Beach Page 16 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 powerelWy Legistar-M File #: 19-545 MEETING DATE: 5/28/2019 DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): April 1, 2019 June 1, 2019 SUMMARY: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed project based on the following: - Consistent with the M-sp (Mixed Use - Specific Plan Overlay) Land Use Designation of the General Plan and the SP 14 - Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan zoning designation. - Implements the objectives of the BECSP to improve the vitality of the Beach Boulevard corridor. - Provides a mixed-use development that is consistent with the BECSP development code and compatible with the surrounding existing and anticipated land uses. - Creates an environment that supports pedestrian and bicycle activity and increases housing. - The project meets the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. - The project contributes to the City's housing stock, including affordable housing as required by existing City requirements, thereby assisting to achieve the City's overall housing goals. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 2. Vicinity Map 3. Project Narrative received and dated May 1, 2019 4. Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 received March 7, 2019 5. Site plan, floor plans, and elevations received April 23, 2019 6. Shadow Analysis 7. BECSP Completed Comparable Projects 8. Site Plan Revised for Clarity 9. Accident Rates in the Project Vicinity 10. Proposed Project and Elan Trip Generation Comparison 11. Summary of Volume/Capacity Ratio in Project Vicinity 12. Preliminary Grading Plan 13. Parking Management Plan received and dated April 22, 2019 14. Sustainability Narrative received and dated September 21, 2018 15. BECSP Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 16. Email Public Comment Received May 17, 2019 17. Air Quality/GHG Analysis, Traffic Impact Analysis, Preliminary Hydrology Report, Draft Water Quality Management Plan, Phase 1 ESA, Geotech Investigation (not attached - see May 14, 2019 PC Study Session Staff Report) 18. Republic Will-Service Letter 19. Code Requirements Letter City of Huntington Beach Page 17 of 17 Printed on 5/29/2019 poweret-54 Legistar— SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR PROJECTS EXEMPT FROM CEQA: The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have any significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, because the project is a mixed-use development that conforms with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan for which Program EIR No. 08-008 was adopted and implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EIR for the BECSP. Compliance with all applicable mitigation measures adopted for the Specific Plan will be required of the project. In light of the whole record, none of the circumstances described under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines are present and, therefore, no EIR or MND is required. The Project, located on the north side of Ellis Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Patterson Lane, consists of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 condominium residences with on- site public and private open space, a three level subterranean parking structure and 891 square feet of commercial space. The development site is located within the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) area. The City certified Program EIR No. 08-008 on December 8, 2009 and adopted the BECSP on March 1, 2010. In 2015, the City Council amended the BECSP to reduce the Maximum Amount of New Development to 2,100 total new dwelling units including 725 units on Beach Boulevard. There are 200 undeveloped units remaining within the MAND on Beach Boulevard. The 48 units contemplated by the project is within the total new dwelling units permitted on Beach Boulevard under the approved BECSP. The project conforms to all standards and regulations of the BECSP development code. Accordingly, no changes requiring revision of the previously certified Program EIR are proposed as part of the project, nor have any circumstances changed requiring revision of the previously certified Program EIR. In addition, no" new information identifies that implementation of the BECSP, including the project, will have significant effects that were not discussed in the previously certified Program EIR or that the significant effects identified in the certified Program EIR will be substantially more severe than determined in the Program EIR. Nor is there new information showing that mitigation measures or alternatives not previously adopted would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 for the consolidation of three parcels into one 0.95 acre parcel is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of Mixed Use on the subject property. The project complies with all applicable code provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, and Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The project will result in the demolition of an existing commercial building, one dwelling unit, and a portion of a former car wash and facilitate the development of a mixed-use building permitted by code. The proposed subdivision is consistent with goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan Land Use Element that govern new subdivisions and residential development. 159 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development in that the project site is able to accommodate the type of development proposed from a public service, circulation, and drainage perspective. The site is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, which permits mixed-use buildings and residential uses within close proximity of commercial uses. The specific plan is a form-based code that does not rely on density to limit development, but rather the building form to create an attractive public experience appealing to pedestrians. By merging the three existing lots into one, the site will function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of the growing urban Beach Boulevard corridor. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the site has been previously used as a car wash, one dwelling unit, and a convenience store. The site does not contain any significant habitat for wildlife or fish. Design features of the project as well as compliance with the provisions of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan will ensure that the subdivision will not significantly impact the function and value of any resources adjacent to the project site. The project will comply with applicable mitigation measures pursuant to Program EIR No. 08- 008. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. Vehicular access is provided via a driveway along Ellis Avenue. The subdivision will provide all necessary street, sidewalk, and utility easements to serve the new subdivision. The project will dedicate four feet of land to widen the existing sidewalk (public right-of-way) along Ellis Avenue. The project will provide all necessary easements and will not affect any existing easements. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17- 042: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences, 891 sf. of retail space and associated infrastructure and site improvements will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood because as conditioned, the project will result in less than significant impacts related to traffic, noise, lighting, aesthetics, and privacy of adjacent residences. Existing multi-family residences adjacent to the east will be buffered from the project by an approximately 33 ft. 7 in. setback on the east side of the project site consisting of landscaping and a driveway. Residents of the project and the general public, including nearby residents, will benefit from the new commercial portion of the building and the public plaza. Based upon the conditions of approval and BECSP mitigation measures, the proposed project will not result in significant impacts onto adjacent properties in that the project complies with setbacks, onsite parking requirements, and allowable building height. The project is a four-story building that is compatible with surrounding developments in terms of architectural design and scale pursuant to the massing and scale requirements of the BECSP. The proposed mixed-use development will be compatible with the surrounding multi-family residential uses and commercial uses in terms of density, layout and overall design. With the conditions of 160 approval imposed, the project's grading and drainage pattern will result in compatible finished grades between adjacent properties. 2. The proposed project will comply with the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) because the project complies with all other setback standards, building height, top and base architectural element requirements, and parking. 3. The General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject property is currently M-sp (Mixed Use — Specific Plan Overlay). Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences, 891 sf. of retail space and associated infrastructure and site improvements is consistent with this designation and the goals and policies of the City's General Plan as follows: Land Use Element Goal LU-1: New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-IA: Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Policy LU-18: Ensure new development supports the protection and maintenance of environmental and open spaces resources. Policy LU-IC: Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-ID: Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Policy LU-2D: Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policy LU-3A: Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. Goal LU-4: A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Policy LU-4A: Encourage a mix of residential types to accommodate people with diverse housing needs. Policy LU-48: Improve options for people to live near work and public transit. 161 Goal LU-13: The city provides opportunities for new businesses and employees to ensure a high quality of life and thriving industry. Policy LU-13A: Encourage expansion of the range of goods and services provided to accommodate the needs of all residents and the market area. The proposed development is consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan which encourages buildings to orient towards streets, wider walkways, and large open space areas to enhance the pedestrian and public experience. Approximately 2,703 sq. ft. of public open space will be provided in a plaza accessible from Ellis Avenue. This area will be designed with enhanced landscaping, seating areas, and visually appealing amenities. The architecture of the building is contemporary, incorporating notches, major fagade offsets, and fagade composition changes to break up the massing of the building at street frontages. Brick veneer is applied along the base of the building with canopies at entrances to cater to the pedestrian scale. The fagade skyline is then capped with parapets and articulating rooflines. Additionally, this mixed-use development will provide an on-site commercial component and is proposed within close proximity of new and existing commercial uses thus reducing the need for automobile use. By permitting a mix of land uses closer together, greater interaction will occur between developments and further the vision and viability of the BECSP. Housinq Element Policy 2.1 Variety of Housing Choices: Provide site opportunities for development of housing that responds to diverse community needs in terms of housing types, cost and location, emphasizing locations near services and transit that promote walkability. Policy 2.2 Residential Mixed Use: Facilitate the efficient use of land by allowing and encouraging commercial and residential uses on the same property in both horizontal and vertical mixed-use configurations. Policy 2.3 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan: Encourage and facilitate the provision of housing affordable to lower income households within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. Policy 6.4 Transportation Alternatives and Walkability: Incorporate transit and other transportation alternatives including walking and bicycling into the design of new development, particularly in areas within a half mile of designated transit stops. The suggested conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 would ensure that the project is developed in accordance with the proposed project narrative and guarantee that the project provides 5 onsite affordable housing 162 units. The project represents new housing in the City that will help to fulfill the City's share of the regional housing need. The proposed project would accommodate and is designed to appeal to different age groups and household types. A minimum of ten percent of the units are required to be designated for affordable housing. The project applicant proposes to provide five on-site affordable housing units in order to comply with the affordable housing requirement. Residents will benefit from the proximity of the project to different activities and uses. The project provides opportunities and convenience for many households to use alternate travel modes such as walking, bicycling, and public transit to complete their daily routines and run errands, thereby serving the need for affordable housing for this segment of the population. Circulation Element Goal CIRC-3a: Convenient and efficient connections between regional transit and areas of employment, shopping, recreation, and housing will increase ridership and active mobility, with a focus on first/last mile solutions. Goal CIRC-6: Connected, well-maintained, and well-designed sidewalks, bike lanes, equestrian paths, and waterways allow for both leisurely use and day-to- day required activities in a safe and efficient manner for all ages and abilities. Policy CIRC-6(C): Require new commercial and residential projects to integrate with pedestrian and bicycle networks, and that necessary land area is provided for the infrastructure. The proposed streetscape will create continuity with new and existing development along the Beach Boulevard corridor by providing a sidewalk with new landscaping to buffer pedestrians from the vehicular thoroughfare. Pedestrian connectivity is improved with landscaping and architectural elements through the proposed public open space and wider sidewalks. The project is serviced by an existing bus stop at the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Ellis Ave. and also provides bicycle parking in the subterranean parking structure to accommodate alternative methods of transportation. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: 1. Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 for consolidation of three existing parcels into a one-lot subdivision for a mixed-use 48 unit residential and 891 square feet commercial development received and dated April 23, 2019, shall be the approved layout, including the following: a. The existing 6-foot easement (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Public Utility Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed water quality basin or the proposed basin shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. b. The existing 20-foot easement, over existing Parcels 1 and 2 (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Ingress and Egress Purposes shall be 163 quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed building or the proposed building shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. 2. The Final Map for Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 shall not be approved by the City Council until Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 is approved and in effect. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and at least 14 days prior to any grading activity, the applicant/developer shall provide notice in writing to property owners of record and tenants of properties within a 500-foot radius of the project site as noticed for the public hearing. The notice shall include a general description of planned grading activities and an estimated timeline for commencement and completion of work and a contact person name with phone number. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, a copy of the notice and list of recipients shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 4. The following shall be shown as a dedication to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Tract Map (HBZSO 230.84 (A) & 253.10 (K)) (PW): a. A 4-foot right-of-way dedication for street purposes along the Ellis Avenue project frontage for a curb to property line width of 12 feet. (BECSP) 5. Prior to submittal of the Final Map and at least 90 days before City Council action on the Final Map, an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) shall be submitted to the Departments of Community Development and Economic Development identifying three on-site units for- sale as affordable for persons and families of moderate income and two on-site units for- sale as affordable for persons and families of low income pursuant to Section 230.14 of the HBZSO. The AHA shall identify five on-site units for rent as affordable for persons and families of low income in the event the project is operated as rental apartment units. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council and shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to issuance of the first building permit for the tract. The Agreement shall comply with HBZSO Sections 230.14 and 230.26 and include: i. A detailed description of the type, size and location of the five affordable housing for- sale units on-site. The mix of designated affordable one bedroom and two bedroom units shall be determined in the Agreement. ii. There shall be three on-site units for sale as affordable to persons and families of moderate income (up to 120% of the Orange County median income). There shall be two on-site units for sale as affordable to persons and families of low income (up to 80% of the Orange County median income). The Orange County median income is adjusted for appropriate household size. iii. In the event the project is operated as rental apartment units, the Agreement shall identify five on-site units for rent as affordable to persons and families of low income (up to 80% of the Orange County median income). The Orange County median income is adjusted for appropriate household size. iv. Continuous affordability provisions for a period of 45 years (for-sale units) and 55 years (rental units). Any required for-sale affordable units shall be owner-occupied (not rented or leased). 164 v. Provisions for the affordable units to be constructed prior to or concurrent with the primary project. Phasing and availability of the affordable units shall be concurrent with final approval (occupancy) of the first market rate residential unit(s), or contingent upon evidence of the applicant's reasonable progress towards attainment of completion of the affordable units. 6. Prior to submittal of the Final Map and at least 90 days before City Council action on the Final Map, CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and approved by the City Attorney. The CC&Rs shall identify: a. The common driveway access easements b. Maintenance of all walls, common landscape areas, and refuse management by the Homeowners' Association c. Management of the BMPs per the approved WQMP by the Homeowners' Association d. Management of the revised Parking Management Plan pursuant to CUP No. 17- 042 Condition No. 2 to ensure the ongoing control and availability of on-site parking. The CC&Rs must be in recordable form prior to recordation of the map. (HBZSO Section 253.12.11-11) 7. Comply with all applicable Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 conditions of approval. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17- 042: 1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated April 23, 2019 shall be the conceptually approved design with the following modifications: a. Depict the controlled access entry gate to the subterranean parking garage discussed in the Parking Management Plan. b. The proposed 10 ft. high perimeter block wall shall be revised to a maximum of 8 ft. high, including up to 2 ft. of retaining wall in accordance with Condition of Approval No. 6.a. 2. The Parking Management Plan dated April 22, 2019 shall be revised to include the following: a. Required parking shall be assigned to and reserved for each unit. Each unit shall be assigned two reserved parking spaces. b. The assigned residential parking spaces shall be provided with the rental of a dwelling unit without any additional cost. (HBZSO 231.18 (D)(2)) 3. Comply with all mitigation measures adopted for the project in conjunction with Environmental Impact Report No. 08-008 as specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Ellis Ave. Condos. 4. Block wall/fencing plans (including a site plan, section drawings, and elevations depicting the height and material of all retaining walls, walls, and fences) consistent with the grading plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. 165 Double walls shall be avoided to the greatest extent feasible. Applicant shall coordinate with adjacent property owners and make reasonable attempts to construct one common property line wall. If coordination between property owners cannot be accomplished, the applicant shall construct up to an eight (8') foot tall wall (including up to 2 ft. of retaining wall) located entirely within the subject property and with a two (2) inch maximum separation from the property line. The plans shall include some mechanism to close and secure any gaps. Prior to the construction of any new walls, a plan must be submitted identifying the removal of any existing walls located on the subject property. Plans shall depict any removal of walls on private residential property and construction of new common walls and sidewalls, and shall include approval by property owners of adjacent properties. The plans shall identify materials, seep holes and drainage. 5. At least 14 days prior to any grading activity, the property owner/developer shall provide notice in writing to property owners of record and tenants of properties within a 500-foot radius of the project site as noticed for the public hearing. The notice shall include a general description of planned grading activities and an estimated timeline for commencement and completion of work and a contact person name with phone number. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, a copy of the notice and list of recipients shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the following shall be completed: a. The proposed drainage pattern and system shall be reevaluated to reduce potential grading impacts on the adjacent properties to the north, east, and west by incorporating localized collection points and result in a maximum two ft. grade differential and maximum two ft. high retaining wall. The retaining wall may be topped with a maximum six ft. high block wall. b. The existing 6-foot easement (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Public Utility Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed water quality basin or the proposed basin shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. (PW) c. The existing 20-foot easement over existing Parcels 1 and 2 (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Ingress and Egress Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed building. (PW) d. An interim parking and building materials storage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division to assure adequate parking and restroom facilities are available for employees, customers and contractors during the project's construction phase and that adjacent properties will not be impacted by their location. The plan shall also be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and Public Works Department. The property owner/developer shall obtain any necessary encroachment permits from the Department of Public Works. e. All design and construction shall be per the City Standard codes and street configuration and specifications of the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The frontage along Ellis Avenue shall comply with the "Neighborhood Streets" configuration. 166 f. A lighting plan depicting the boulevard-scale street lighting and pedestrian-scale street lighting along Ellis Ave. shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval by the Planning Division and Public Works Department. 7. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index. The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point. b. Submit three (3) copies of the site plan and the processing fee to the Community Development Department for addressing purposes after street name approval by the Fire Department. c. Contact the United States Postal Service for approval of mailbox location(s). d. One set of project plans revised pursuant to Condition No. 1 and one 8 '/2 inch by 11 inch set of all colored renderings, elevations, and materials sample and color palette, revised pursuant to Condition of Approvals and Code Requirements, shall be submitted for review, approval, and inclusion in the entitlement file, to the Planning Division. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. The applicant shall submit plans revised pursuant to Condition No. 1 to Republic Services for review. Proof of Republic Services approval shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. b. Submit a copy of the revised site plan, floor plans and elevations pursuant to Condition No. 1 for review, approval, and inclusion in the entitlement file to the Community Development Department. c. A Fire Master Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Department. The Fire Master Plan shall include but is not limited to the following: i. Building locations, height and stories, addresses, and construction type; ii. Property dimensions or accurate scale; iii. Fire hydrant locations, public and private; iv. FDC locations; v. Fire sprinkler riser locations and location of system serving; vi. FACP locations; vii. Knox box and knox switch locations; viii. Gate locations, and opticoms if required; 167 ix. Fire lane locations, dimensions, lengths, turning radii at corners and circles/cu I-dee-sacs; x. Fire lane signage and striping. xi. The conceptual Alternative Materials and Methods Strategy shall be finalized to demonstrate compliance with exterior hose pull distance requirements. (FD) 9. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit, the following shall be completed: a. The proposed driveway approach on Ellis Avenue shall be constructed per Public Works Standard Plan No. 211. The driveway design shall include treatments for right-turn in/right-turn out only as specified by Public Works. This may include raised curb channelization, striping, and signage. (ZSO 230.84) b. The Developer shall provide a Landscape Maintenance License Agreement for the continuing maintenance and liability of all landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, furniture and hardscape that is located along the project frontage within the public right-of-way. The agreement shall describe all aspects of maintenance such as enhanced sidewalk cleaning, trash cans, disposal of trash, signs, tree or palm replacement and any other aspect of maintenance that is warranted by the development plan improvements proposed. The agreement shall state that the property ownership shall be responsible for all costs associated with the maintenance, repair, replacement, liability and fees imposed by the City. (PW) c. All existing overhead utilities that occur along the project's Ellis Avenue frontage shall be under-grounded. This includes the Southern California Edison (SCE) aerial distribution lines (12kV) and poles along the entire length of the westerly frontage of the subject project. This condition also applies to all utilities, including but not limited to all telephone, electric, and Cable TV lines. If require, easements shall be quitclaimed and/or new easements granted to the corresponding utility companies. (PW) 10. The use shall comply with the following: a. All ground floor entry points to residences shall be monitored by secured FOB type entries. (PD) 11. The developer or developer's representative shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval. 12. CUP No. 17-042 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of the final approval or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Community Development Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. 13. Incorporating sustainable or "green" building practices into the design of the proposed structures and associated site improvements is highly encouraged. Sustainable building practices may include (but are not limited to) those recommended by the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Program 168 certification (http://www.usgbc.org/DisplaVPage.aspx?CategorvlD=19) or Build It Green's Green Building Guidelines and Rating Systems (http://www.builditgreen.orq/green-building- guidelines-rating). INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION: The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. 169 i i OEM .} mommomm' :1 1 mmmmmmm '� momomm RY 444 SEMEN■ i a t INMEM4 7 � _�� rv^ ( `•'tom:�. 4 k � mr • CIS A * � La Palma Or I La Palma�r ndo s Project Site • . aftck j` �� i� D-K L'q r r r,•?� I i EllisAve EIIisAve _ EIIisAve Ili e VICINITY MAP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-004/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 181571ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT • 11 AVENUE CONDOS) • mc � architecture May 1, 2019 City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street, 3rd Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92648 REGARDING Huntington Beach Condos, Ellis & Beach MCG Project No. 17.359.05 To whom it may concern: Our client, THDT Investment, Inc. is proposing to redevelop 3-existing lots (totaling approximately 41,200 s.£)near the north-east corner of Ellis Avenue and Beach Boulevard within the Huntington Beach - Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan. The new development will demolish the existing liquor store at 8041 Ellis Avenue, the single family residence behind the liquor store and part of the lot adjacent to the Metro car wash at 18400 Beach Boulevard to build a new four story mixed use building with an approximately 891 s.f. retail use on the ground floor along Ellis Avenue and a combination of single and two bedroom condominium units throughout the remainder of the approximately 79,000 s.f. building. The proposed unit mix would be 42- 2 bedroom units- approximately 880 s.f. ea. and 6 single bedroom units -approximately 645 s.f. ea. for a total of 48 units overall. The City of Huntington Beach Business Development staff provided the total number of required affordable housing units to be 4.8. The developer is seeking to provide 5-affordable units overall. Parking to serve the development will consist of three sub-grade levels for a total of 128 parking stalls.The intention is for the units to be sold to individual buyers so there will be no permanent on-site staff. Building maintenance and regular up-keep and cleaning will be handled by the owners management team via contracts with local services. This new development will be an enhancement to the community by adding a modern environmentally friendly& small scale mixed use complex with unit pricing sized to suit the average consumer. The location allows owners to visit amenities such as Helme Park, medical, dental and eye care centers as well as local markets all within a short walking distance. Public transportation is close by as well via the existing bus stop on Beach Boulevard in front of the Metro Car Wash. Owners on the upper floors of the south and west side units will be afforded serene ocean views and breezes to help enhance their lifestyles. Retail.Entertainment.Nospoamy.Ottice CLEVELAND • OENVER • GLENDORA • IRVINE • SAN FRANCISCC 171 City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach Condos, Ellis & Beach in c g a r c h i t e c t u r e May 1, 2019 is Page 2 Yours truly, MCG ARCHITECTURE Jeff Herbst, Project Director XXX:xx Enclosures CC Retail.Entertainment.Hospitality.Office CLEVELAND • DENVER • GLENDORA • IRVINE - SAN FRANCISCO 172 TENTATlVf— TRACT MAP NO. 19157 t ,1AILRA✓L FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, rA GENERAL NOTES: STATE OF CAZIFORN14 PROJECT MARCH 2O19 SITE 1.PREPARED'OCTOBER 2018 � In ELL/5 <E 2.PROPOSED PROPERTY USE:MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDOS;2 LEVELS OF PARKING BELOW GROUND BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR CONSISTENT �4� THROUGHOUT,ICOMMON ROOF3.GENERAL PLAN:M SP D MIXED USE G4RRLZOAVEZONING.SPECIFIC PLAN 14 ' V 8 N89°19'34"W 98.56' f✓-.. m 4.PROPOSED ZONING:MIXED USE YORKTOWN Al£ 5.PROPERTY ACREAGE:0.95AC �EX.BOIIDINO TO I BE IiENOVED AFIV IJj�J1! !.S 6.EXISTING BUILDINGS ONSITE TO BE REMOVED { � VICINITY MAP 7.FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 06059CO253J,FLOOD ZONE X NOT TO SCALE 8.TOPOGRAPHY BY FIELD SURVEY SEPTEMBER 14,2017. + Ex eunuiND to EASEMENT NOTES: I eE REMOVED k 1 1 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES,IN FAVOR OF A W.FULLER AND NELLIE FULLER,RECO RED SEPTEMBER 27,1922,IN BOOK 437 OF DEEDS,PAGE 269.(OFFSITE DOES NOT AFFECT PROPERTY) Q j Q AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, RECORDED NOVEMBER 13.1957 IN BOOK 4101,PAGE 501 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.(PLOTTED ` HEREONITO BE QUITCLAIMED) MN/J�-Jul-o5 Q AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, RECORDED JUNE 23 1971 IN BOOK%89 PAGE 78 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.(PLOTTED HEREON) - QAN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF PARCEL 2 OF A PARCEL 4 MAP RECORDED SEPTEMBER 3 1971,IN BOOK 38 PAGE 16,RECORDED NOVEMBER 29.1971 IN $ Ex.euiLDiNc ro w BOOK 9905,PAGE 184 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.(PLOTTED HEREON/TO BE QUITCLAIMED) e _ .l.Fi)-3I11j17 E IL—TD �, m Q AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES.IN FAVOR OF PARCEL 1 OF A PARCEL 6 MAP RECORDED OCTOBER 8,1971,IN BOOK 39,PAGE 2.(PLOTTED HEREONftO BE NUMBERED LOTS: m 8 QUITCLAIMED) a m z LOT AREA WIDTH oEPrH z' o ( ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER(S): o 1 0.95 AC 715' 122' m z LEGALOTMETO L 4 157-341-W7,157-341-0M8 BE w i , — DESCRIPTION: p / J 11 PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 2,IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,COUNTY OF ORANGE, 88' ` I - STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 39,PAGE(S)2,OF PARCEL I MAPS,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, / CALIF'RN- r II PARCEL 1,IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,COUNTY OF ORANGE.STATE OF 20'/�TggE CALIFORNIA,AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 30,PAGE(S)16,OF PARCEL AMPS, 7�IXeT(FWED -- RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA. BULDN E,o J) ✓-r ENGINEER: OWNER/DEVELOPER: 1 BE EMOVEO ' KWC ENGINEERS OC DEVELOPMENT,LLC e 1880 COMPTON AVENUE,SURE 100 1307 W 6TH STREET,STE 202 E REMOVE.OT I'� to� CORONA.CA 92881-3370 CORONA,CA 92-2 (951)734-2130 (951)893-1goo I meE CONTACT:BRANDON BARNETT,P.E. TAHIR SALIM .1!'N 15J-S1�-J6 11 QUITGEAIMEO� � I 6!� TO BE/�S I OOITG EDrZY 1' 9n i 1 r 5m QgoFESS/ M. @T,w�1^ \ _E�l _ /M/1 —— — � E>tp.9/SO/19 � N89°19'34'W 98.SB' ._ ���OF civi ELLIS AVENUE 40' 0 40' 80' 120' 50AZE IN FFFT ENO/NEERS �:«w G'o _ BEACH BLVD. I � Eusnno unosc�mw I I I ® v6mo cw w.sn.wE1 µa,1 I ms,iwww.en auuwu �n. I — 5 I � I o 1 a w I to I a,wl.oal...ea JI roN:oEvousnEo ns,n�mn �� F-1 n ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS EXISTING/DEMO DATE: 06/24@019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-1 MCD JDa N: 17.960.01 SITE PLAN DIVE REVISIONS 12M17 REVISED PER 12hllCOMMENTS Scale: I'-2D-O' 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica,Suite 260 08�1210MV18 REVISREVSED PER 12-12-1e COMMENTS Irvine,Cal9om 74.70 6 D3.gU19 REVISED PER 12-2619 COMMENTS = HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 r 949.553.1117 v 949.474.7056 0 1tl 20' CO megamhftecture.cam m,.,w,...1a•�w waaww a,..,wrw,.w.,.a wr,ww w Y+�w wer,w�w 1.aau � ire A.1 B.1 C.1 D.1 E.1 F.1 F.2 F.3 F.4 G.1 H.1 L1 f d) SITE SUMMARY ZONING:BEACH-EDINGER SPECIFICPLAN-SP-14 1ns yr -341 APN 157 -04 07&08 of wa Ora vrf I va �f �f __ vra rra xf T LAND. 0.955 AC 41,210S.F. 0 OCCUPANCY: R-Z1M BUILDING:CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III­ BUILDINGS.F. 0 1 ! FLOOR AREA >e 15,578 SF SECOND LEVE STREET LEVELL 17.470 SF I-A THIRD LEVEL 17.470 SF ROOF DECK LEVEL 6,910 SF 2 -q �• - I TOTAL FLOOR AREA 57,3293F { I- 218- Irzl -I PARKING AREA:- L J � I k �I E7 "{.1x R00M 'T T' r - a+axiweon" "'r T �T I PAR KING LEVEL 29.7515E m�nvLme I PARKING LEVEL 2 10,751 SF 4 _ PARKING LEVEL 10.7945E TOTAL PARKING AREA 64,296 SF I I I I I I NUMBER OF UNITS - ; I STREET LEVEL 12 UNITS --— 2N0 TO 3RD LEVEL 29 UNITS _--_ Fi00F DECK LEVEL 7UNRS ITOTAL UNITS 40 UNITS OA B C D E ITS F ' H I J REQUIRED.DEVELOPER WILL BE PROVIDING 5 UNITS. 2 ND FLOOR PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 7157.IN BOOK 157,PAGE 3+OF ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE. OVdI_ER ITI % THDT INVESTMENTS S a a n'a 7 am-r 1307 W.6TH ST.f 02 CORONA.CA92M b b na errs of na nr w _ rarer Ne �a 951, 3.W5 f,�{,,.�,���w rcn�__ = "r _a SAUMTHEONE®VAHOO.COM `- xe�e•_wx-urn __ -_'r- —�__ __Lr-F�—r r- z ma rr:7e• - 1rta uE '\ -I'�-�-r� APPLICANT MCG AR CHITECTUREIJEFF HERBST - _, ___ __ kIll CD499FEN_7 l� --t ~ _ \ i IRVINE,CA 92618 -- Q-- Q DI9.W3.1117 JHERBSTGMCGARCHITECTURECOM la:a, LU 17 L I- w " Ir, M,L9R�eI�xFA�11 � �\� I �\r 1� xr 7�01IFI, I u« o Cn WAT - - - - +- - F G H I A J - \ J STREET LEVEL ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS SITE PLAN& DMCG"#'. 1°N�A' FIRST&SECOND FLOOR PLANS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-2 DATE REVISIONS 111 Pa c ifica,Su • MAW19 REVISED PER 12-2 16COMMENTS Scale:1'=201-0' 8041 ELLIS AVENUE Suite 280 N116119 CITY COMMENTS REVISION Irvine,Califomia 92618 0E91M9 REVISED a OFAHUS z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA92648 05/01119 REVISED AMUST05TOTAL 0 1a 2D T 949.J63.1117 F 949Aure.co6 mcgarchitecture.cem 9M _ ,ro a 11 r I � �• ,a.,< W,,.o a«�E a� �,.,.E ,��,.. „M.a 31 a — — _ -- - ------I 6 C D E F H I J ROOF DECK g ;F , Ir y aim � alel I , I .� � I ;;;;jj I L a � — mml- 2. 3RD FLOOR PLAN ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS THIRD FLOOR PLAN DATE: THIRD R: ' o; AND ROOF PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-3 DATE REV510NS • 111Pac'fiica,Suite 290 oalyle REVISED MR2.1a18c MEWS scale:I-2aa 8041 ELLIS AVENUE OR'11rya REV.PERRM171OMMENTWLC Irvine,F 9am74.706 OWIII 92618 18 REVISED PER1aT MWIMEMEMs z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 OMWIa RENISEDPER122 18C 11AENTS D 10 �' a' T 949.553.1117 r 949.4i4.T056 mcgarchitecture.com aM ,,. A.1 B.1 t. IL P llfl 1 1 � p � �I oMv"*E Hoof wcx 4 °row°wi.NrE° x°°E DECK P Deno I �Erelx¢+« I I I I I I I I I 1 A B C D E F G H ROOF ROOF PLAN ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS DATE ,°aTrzmT ROOF PLAN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-4 Mca doa r: n.3s9.°t DATE REVISIONS 08H2JI8 REMEDPER2-1218COMMENTS Scale:r=20'-0• 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111Pac Pacifica, OWII118 REV.MR WENT COMMENTSA-C � Irvine,Cal'If9mia92618 11/1611a %MSEDPER-11-18COMMENTS z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 03AN19 REVISED PER 122618COMMENTS 0 to 2tl a° T 949.553.1117 F 949.474.7(156 x M 9.R�.Ec szo E mc8arch tecture.com 9M ,n A.1 F.1 F.2 F.3II��F.4 11 Y I I �j� "^�/•a wev�TE Biwa � 4 ^E al I I - lE�PFP 0.1�t -D06FW GE o yva_ PETAIL P—ING(!TA �lal � ! � oa�wA. P Prao wnsN,N 1A�ELEv Loenv,�I-- YI wr.tw.r a li �r- � II ` aEIEST PApfING,12 STALLS) II I 11 I 1 e„ P1 PARKING LEVEL-53 STALLS c A 1 F.1 F.2 F.3 F.4 1.1 .POPan .M1j�------ _7' �'�' <u1E8TPMNWG OzsTALL6) \ III/ _ R s I II I 1 6 _. C P2 PARKING LEVEL-53 STALLS ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS Parking Levels HUNTINGTON BEACH CA A-5 DATE: 11 n2 ) MCG JOB N: .�e 360,o, Scheme E 1 DATE REVISIONS • IZW17 REVISEDPER12817COMMENTS Scale:I—2a-0. 8041 ELLIS AVENUE Ill Pacifica,Suite 280 015/12p8 REVISED PER 91 M 8 COMMENTS rvine,0a18amia92618 11/18/18 REVISEDPER1017-1000MMENTS z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 T 949.553.1117 F 949.474.7058 QWN119 REVISED PER 12-2 10 COMMENTS a 1e M mcgarchitectum.com .,rw P dMP�•enu.A'N.�.n""� F.3 F.4 A 1.1 tr s _—________________________ blll-III / A P3 PARKING LEVEL-22 STALLS I I 1 I dl xsunnu nwnuo.e�k�.l dl dl _ ---.[slax:w wows NqR dl r, b OFTL a SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SECTION C-C ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS Parking Levels DATE q20?° MCp.1oR r/: Scheme E HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-6 crass ai DATE REVISIONS • 111Paeifiea,Suite280 12MIl REVISEDPERI2�&17MMMENTS Scale: 1 20'-0• 8041 ELLIS AVENUE oe/12118 REMED PER 2-12-18COMMENTS _ Wne,CalrfOmio92618 1V1a+a REVISEDPERTDI7-18COMMENTS t 1 z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 Y 949.553.1117 i 949.474.765fi OSAMIY PEV6EDPERI2-28+8COMMEWS o to' 2a ao' mepemhdoctum.com �y wpw�whpxeapMNausv � n MATERIALS: M BE BD HH " " " FF F JJ " JJ " "" PAINTS: i� OAF.....,.�,,...�_\_.._..__. •D --i46-L°..••• SWIM-WHITE FLOUR* BRICK VENEER,COLOR:SEPIA.WIRE CUT. `.,ROOF ROOF Or SHE RWIN WK-LIAMS BY MCNEAR BRICI( `T bd FFL \ WO FFL SW101]'WORLOLY GMr BOR Y"K VENEER,EAR BRIM OR:TANGIERS,WIRE CUT, Q DOOFDE KUEVEL BOd FF...LEVEL BY'.SHERWINWILLWJS FL CC CLEAN ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SRp FLOOR LF/El b S-O'FLEXIBLE GRAY' WI CLEAR GLAZING ($i 2Dd FR PIId L'FFL`LEVEL e. BY:SHERWINWILLIAMS D.O.RETAIL CEILINCjiIII, SW00S0'COLONIAL YELLOW' IMI MINTEDSTEELDOOR h_ROOR_(EVEI 1..- to:!cFL I § Q 1ND BOOR LEVEL_. IILLJJJJ TT m I I� BY'.SHERWIN WILLIAMS EE METAL RAILING,CCLCR:MANSANDBROWN tOd fiL dl J�, 0! �10d FFL ' O a-. ANYON CLAr BV:McELROY METALS 6 _E. DR^iFNA'� STAEET LEVEL_ BV'.SHERrVIN WIlL1AM5 F BN FT E%TERIOR PIA,RTER-SMOOTH FINISH OL'FFL BY SHE'WINWOLIAMS ERRED' -DULL gIOi BOY FOR BY SHERWIN WILLIAMS B�MrUGATE METAL, COLOR:ASH GMY �t0d1iR LEVELI _- - FlRE ANO PCMLE _ __ -_l _ AQPARKWFFING LEVEL1 ..y I -IDd FFL BY!80HERWMWILLIAMSCH GRAr XN CORRUGATED METAL.COLOR'.DOWN BLUE I' PARgNOUEVELf I �I __ BY'.MFELROY METALS �1-2D'd FR �F _I PANMNO IEVEL2_ ,f r -PB-0'FFL T� O VDA'GRIFFIN' Y SHERW WIL B IN LIAMS OMETALTR-VAIETALTRIM /,.PAiQIOLEVELS I ti PARKWOLEVELi FFL SHAPED CORNK;EI TRIM V d BV9I-AN RO HLIAMS SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION JJ FF FF FF JJ N1 EE T fF BB JJ JJ CC XX FF 1 a I J "TI RDO 7 F rd. ._.0 KCd FR RDDF (f qd F�7 DEC 1.1.;1 9tld F� SRO ROOK LEVEL PDd FR _ l BID ROOK LEVEL to al ISI'EERr IFVEL- I UDDER LOCATION AT PARKING LEVELI if .tOd FR � J_ PARKNG LEVEL 2 L_�_ Jtld FR WEST ELEVATION Fi Ip FF BO FF M CC JJ PF R FFI ["I XN FF JJ FF M JJ EE JJ 121a a T 1 E a IgOF..om IEd FFL N RJOF Itld FR ROOF DEG(LEVEL_ L SO'-0'FFL JL �ORD FLOOR IEVEL -FFL _. �ILI�'B iNlc IUNG , �2N0 FLOOR IEVEL 1'� IAd FL _ - I �iQd FFL Y ELuS AVENUE �Od FFL '. FRONTYADD SETBACK 1BAfaUNG IEVELI _ - PMKINOLEVEL2 PANNING LEVEL _ EAST ELE VATION CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS M G"# 1 01 Scheme E HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA A-7 DATE REVISION_ 12/20/17 REVISED PERI2-S17COMMENTS s�L,IR 1/16"=V-0• 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica,Suite 280 PER 2 Irvine,California 92618 DB/12fIS REVISEDNHCLIENT 0MMENENTS pm HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 1 949,553.1117 F 949.474.7066 OB/ttltS REV.PER CLIENT COMh1ENT5/LC � � d!1&'IB CITYCOMMENTSREVISI( 0 IT 1B 3Y mcga ch tecture.cam .w...r,:Im W RBRa BFDR— n...,e..P..•=,,:+nay .` . ROOF RooE oloo ROOF KLEVEL-I, lit. •a1DRIVEVAY �- -. ���11-�����1111 IIII IIII 1111�� IIIII�jj-� �n� �■■�� �iili���illl /11111111 _ - DUAL w� Ell SOUTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION RAILING DETAIL GLAZING AREA DIAGRAM N.T.S. ■■■■■ ....I .... ■■1■■ ■.■■ r��llllli■ ��1111 IIII IIII jjlji■ - 111111111�■ I��111'1I111111�11111i1 11111 ■■s■■ ■■.. ■■.■ r- — ■■..■ ■■■■ ■■ �� ■■.■■_ ���11111�■ ��1111 11�I IIII 1111�■ 111111111��"��1111 IIII 11�1 1111�■ Illllllll�� �_ LADDER LOCATION AT PARKING WEST ELEVA-nON wlllll■-i ■■IIII IIII IIII IIII■-■ 111111111■ill■illll IIII IIII ■��■■-■�Illu.r■■■i ■�iiiii 1■i■�..■ ■--�■■i■-----Ti - ii ■ � II�I min I_I�h�r,1�=1=1r.1C--1�I morn — n = n1 ■■■ ■T■ 111 11111 11111 ��� �������II'�II �■Illl��i■��■i��llll�■ ■■11111��1 1�■ ■i■ 111����11111�� ■■Illll���r 1�! i■■IIII noi■ IIII■■ ■■11111 �� ... ... iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillilllI 1 11FFL EAST ELEVATION ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS DATE DATE REVISIONS Ill Pacifica,Suite 280 8041 taa \ II _ II II II m m —. - RETAIE ac ts•- EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION it I O x T7�� — (NOTCH) 18a'-4' � (I0 HORISONTAE FACESEGMENT) PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS BUILDING OFFSET/NOTCHES STUDY p DATE: MCO JOB. °°n-o Scheme E HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-8 DATE REVISIONS =-,2j1a HEVISEDPER212-16cOMMENTs scale: 111s•=r-p 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica,Suite 2BD OWL1/16 REV.PER CLIENTCOMMENTS/Lc fi HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 Irvine,California 92618 1111&13 REVISED PER la17 -18 COMMENTS 03p11e REVISED PER 122 l8COMMENTS a 61 16' 32' '1 cgarch3ecturexturn 6 mcgamhitecture.cam wE .gin e yM �'n a w imq,ea W ma arn,x. SM IEN�TB1=,..�I LLI (m p 6 BUII UIN.kNVFIOFk PRIMARYVOLUMES INTRODUCE OTHER SUP Vq UMES RESULTING BUILDING ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING ENVELOPE PRIM—VOLUMES % JT Twd INTRODUCE OTHER SUB VOLUMES RESULTING BUILDING ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS BUILDING MASSING PROPORTIONS mcojos Apo; Scheme E HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-10 12W1T REVISED PER 12- 1TCOMMENTS N.T.S. 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica,Suite 260 • OBf12110 REVISED PER 2-121SCOMMENTS Irvine,California 92616 11/16/18 REVISED PER W-1T-I9CMMENTS HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 949.553.1111 r 949.474.7056 D3/D4/1Y REVISED PER 1228-18CMMENT3 mcgamhitecture.com wr ra w aNw�w wwwe h Ew welwn SM PRIVATE SPACE CALCULATION: ` - 60 SF PER UNIT X 48 UNITS =2,880 SF REQUIRED "'¢-°"• ❑ - ••�-.• ti 61 SF PER 1 BEDROOM X 4 UNITS = 244 SF PROVIDED 93 SF PER 2 BEDROOM X 42 UNITS =3,306 SF PROVIDED .� ROOF DECK PRIVATE OPEN SPACE =3,281 SF PROVIDED A a TOTAL OF 6,831 SF PROVIDED FF $ a a A 11 FIRST FLOOR UNITS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE CALCULATION. J a ROOF DECK SPACE TO BE USED IN LIEU OF FIRST FLOOR SPACE +" BEING NON-COMPLIANT. TYPICAL PRIVATE SPACE—SINGLE BEDROOM UNIT TYPICAL PRIVATE SPACE—TWO BEDROOM UNIT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATION: 50 SF X 48 UNITS =2,400 SF REQUIRED 891 SF RETAIL/1,000 SF=0.891 X 50 SF =44.55 SF REQUIRED =2,445.55 SF REQUIRED TOTAL OF 2,703 SF PROVIDED 30'-0• � b- PLAZA:Pu °e.7EGS 2,]03 S.F. I. (SEE LANDSCAPE � z UNIT IF PLANS FOR DESIGN) IL C.-L°bhy Type Pr'Nate Frontage G J^la LI_I �/ r / �, ReteilspeCe L . U) / q1 CF UNIT to V V V ) Je i W nl I :,d. PRIVATE PATIO TPRIVATE PATIO j R¢6F f3 EN B F PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ROOF DECK PRIVATE OPEN SPACE ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS PUBLIC& DATE; A: 10/31/ 1 PRIVATE SPACE PLANS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-1 1 MW JOBDATE REVISIONS • 111 Pacifica,Suite 280 12/20/17 REVISED PER 12-9-17COMMENTS Scale: 1/e°=r-0° 8041 ELLIS AVENUE W112/18 REVISED PER 2-12-18 COMMENTS Irvine,Colifomia 92618 11/1E/19 REVISED PER 10-f/-1PE.MMENTS —ram z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA92648 �51949.553.1117 IY�949.474.705fi WIN119 REVISED PER 12 26 18 COMMENTS 0 d' 9' 18' mcgarchitecture.com ve am a " v m W°m nmnen. SM ZONING CONFORMANCE MATRIX SUBJECT CODESECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED BUILDING USE TYPES 23.1 RETAILUCOMMERCIAL AT GROUND LEVEL RETAIL PROVIDED AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2.23 MINIMUM 10%OF UNITS TO BE AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS 5UNITS PROVIDED BUILDING MASSING 2.3.5 MASSING TO BE 1L.3H OR 3L:IN SEE PLANS FOR NOTCH,OFFSET AND ELEVATIONS FOR MASSING MODEL PARKING 2.7.1.13 125 In LANDSCAPING 232.0800 8%MIN. 22% BUILDING HEIGHT 2:03.01 AM MIN,2 STORYUMAI,4 STORY 4-STORIES PRIVATE FRONTAGE 2.42 PROVIDE TYPE OF FRONTAGE COMMON LOBBY TYPES 2A.3 FRONT w 0' 2.4.3 UPPER Ie'MIN 1a-P SETBACKS STORY 2.4.4 SIDE Ia-a'WNVINDOVYS 101-0" 2.4.5 REAR la'-o' 19-V FRONTAGE 2A.7 90%MAK. 54.79% IMPROVEMENTS TO 2 5.1 PROVIDE NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS DESIGN SEE SITEIG ROUND LEVEL PLAN E%ISTIN>STREETS OPEN SPACE 26.1 505.EWRIT-2,400 S.F. PLAZA-2703 S.F. PRNATE OPEN SPACE 2A.3 00S FANIT-2.9B0 S F. 9.931 S.F. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 2.6.4 PROVIDE TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PLAZA-SEE STREETIGRWND LEVEL PLAN TYPE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 2AS PROVIDE TYPE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PRIVATE YARD-SEE PANS TYPES OPEN SPACE 2.9.8 PROVIDE DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING UNDSCARNG SEE LANDSCAPE PANS LANDSCAPING SETBACK AREA 26.9 PROVIDE DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING LANDSCAPING SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS LANDSCAPING PARKING SPACE H6ZS0231.14 STALL STRIPING TO BE AS DEPICTED IN DIAGRAM W SEE PARKING LEVEL PLANS DIMENSIONS PARKING DESIGN SEE PARKING LEVEL PLANS-T WOE UL 25-LONG SPACE STANDARDS HB230231.18 PROVIDE VEHICLE TURNAROUND SPACE AT DEAD END ASIE$ PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING HRZSO 231.20 ONE BIKE RACK PER 4 UNITS AND ONE FOR EVERY 25 PARKING 20 PROVIyIDED-SEE PARKING PANS. STALLS 3 MINIMUM GENERAL PARKING 2.7.3 DRIVEWAYS TO BE SETBACK 5-MIN.FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY. SEE STREETlGRWNO LEVEL PAN. PARKING DESIGN STANDARD HBZSOI31 18 PROVIDE MIN.2F TURN RADIUS FOR DRIVEWAYS INTO GARAGE TURN RADIUS ADDED TO PARKING LEVEL PLANS FACADE HEIGHT TMNDONISTOREFRONTS 5 RASTER REVEALS AT BASE ARTICULATION 2.8.1 INCORPORATE ARTICULATION INTO BASE AND TOP ELEMENTS PROVIDE PEDESTRUN SCALE.CORNICE PROVIDES TOP ARTICULATION. FACADE REVISED TO ADD GLAZING FOR MIN.20%COMPLIANCE. ARCHITECTURAL REVISED SOUTH ELEVATION Tp REFLECT RETAIL MAIN ENTRY, ELEMENTS 2.8.2 PROVIDE INFO REGARDING FACADE COMPOSITION. MECHARICA EQUIPMENT TO BE YATHIN ATTIC SPACES NOT REGULATIONS ENTRANCES.ROOF EQUIPMENT AND SCREENING. ROOF MINTED-ONLY VENT FANSrPLUMSINGVENTS ON ROOF VMICH WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. ARCHITECTURAL TRA,SHIRECYCLE ROOM ADDED ON MAIN FLOOR WITH ELEMENTS 2.82 TRASHMECYCLE ENCLOSURES OVERHEAD DOOR FOR BIN DUMPING AND CHUTE PROVIDED REGULATIONS FOR RESIDENTS REFUSE STORAGE TRASHMECYCIE ROOM ADDED ON MAIN FLOOR WTH AREAS HB29D 23D.78 REFUSE STORAGE AREAS OVERHEAD DOOR FOR BIN DUMPING SCREENING OF UTILITY METERS 8 BACKFLOVV DEVICES 7 OR SMALLER SHALL N MECHANICAL HRZSO 230.76 BE SETBACK FM IN.FROM PROP FRERTY LINE.OR 10' ADDED OTE/LOCATpN ON GROUND FLOOR PAN AND FOR DEVICES LANDSCAPE SCREENING ON GROUND LANDSCAPE PLANS. EQUIPMENT LARGER THAN 2'AND SHALL BE SCREENED OM VIEW. ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS ZONING DATE: 107.W.17 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA A-12 MCO JOB 0: t].358.01 CONFORMANCE MATRIX 1 DATE REVISIONS 111 Pacifica,Suite 260 • 121MI7 ADDED THIS SHEET scale:NONE 8041 ELLIS AVENUE OM12118 REVISED PER 242-18IMMENTS Irvine,Calif9mia 92fi16 r HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 T 949,553,1117 F 949,474.7056 0 1a m 4a mcgarch tecture.cam aho�Io siu'/anl'wrnl�No W nd � 0 aAnoNeMMe.udn�n 851 PUBLIC PLAZA FURNITURE DECORATIVE ENTRY CONCRETE PAVING PUBLIC PLAZA UTILITIES SCREENING SHRUBS PROPERTY LINE x tYYV C--_______� II + _ l Z / w ^.. RAJSED ROUND I CONCRETE Q PLANTERS MATH .. • 1 PALM PLANTINGS J + J W POTTED PA _ � PLANTS ® 1 .._ __ _ jr- _ _ T STREET_ LEVEL FRGPERT "NE=.zz� - -- --— CONCEPT PLANT 50HEDULE REFERENCE NOTES SGHEWLE ,oerA VERTICAL FOUNDATION TREES TRISTANIA GONFERTA/BR15BANE BOX O •-a awca�Pcw,wme urine aaa•cr ACCENT PALMS 4 PHOENIX ROEBELENII/P16MY DATE PALM WLTI-TRUNK RHAPIS EXCELSA/LADY PALM `Y y� PARKriAY PALM TREE5 4 (�yN;;�' WASHIN6TONIA ROBU5TA/MEXIGAN FAN PALM MA&N WRING ACCENT TREES 3 � MAGNOLIA 6RANDIFLORA'LITTLE GEM'/DWARF 50UTHERN MAGNOLIA MELALEUG UE A gUINONERVIA/CA.PPUT TREE ---A TREES T WATER CONSERVATION STATEMENT PROSOPIS GHILENSIS/CHILEAN ME50UITE STREET 1RFF 2 TRISTANIA GONFERTA/BRISBANE BOX ��.re�nor�w,v.�uru�rti�mem�...eo�a 30 .0 v+ox.'e Nw saa«a�w.x nw.,n.wHTu�m. PARTHENOGISSUS TRIGU5PIDATA/JAPANE5E GREEPER n wn»e on.wiemw a+em�wa rai a.Pm Poor sma gran roR,rm. SHR118 AND GROUNDGOVER PLANTING 5,605 SF w.u•.•oaoe wucwr�.ra.x u.uenn.se.ew o.ne,a.wveww ANIGOZANTHOS X'BVSH GOLD'/KANGAROO PAW 113 BOUGAINVILLEA SPEGTABILIS/GREAT BOUGAINVILLEA 24 BOUGAINVILLEA%'RASPBERRY ICE'/BOUGAINVILLEA 50 +<rumw"maru.,++�iwusa.,..m.Ra�•ro.scr r.erz...w.a.rz G11-1STEMON VIMINALIS'LITTLE JOHN'/DWARF WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 72 DIANELLA TA5MANICA YARIEGATA'/FLAX LILY TB J-ISLANDSCAPE60 rPT PLAN HA5 BEEN PREPARED FEIJOA 5ELLOWIANA/PINEAPPLE GUAVA TREE 40T INCORPORATING THE DE516N ELEMENT5 REFERENCED IN ED THE BEACH ANDIN6ER CORRIDORS SPECIFIC PLAN LIRIOPE"U5r ARI SILVERY SUNPROOF'/SILVERY SJNPROOF BLUE LILYTUiF 21T ROSA X'FLOWER CARPET PINK'/ROSE 122 ❑ BUFFER SHRUB MASSING 436 5F GREVILLEAX'N°ELL°'/GREVILLEA ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS PRELIMINARY PLAN DATE �3.177,1 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA MCO JOB X�. 13.1)T Ot f waJoes: ,a3T DATE REVISIONS scale: 1/16°=r-O' _ 111 Pacifica, Suite 280 s,e H PMMr, z Irvine, California 92618 e 1s 92 0949.553.11170949.474.7056 mcgorchitecture.com BTU a a a, �r a DATE: 05/20/2019 SHADOW STUDY MCG JOB#: 17359.00 MAY 1-31,2019(2:30pm.) HUNTINGTON BEACH CONDOS DATE REVISIONS 8041 ELLIS(�AVENUE 111 Pacifica, Suite 280 0 MW ARCHITECTS 2g17 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED HUNTINGTON BEACH,92648 Irvine,Califomia 92618 rma NOTE.This intolion is caicepWal in nature and is whlect to eal—enm peWIN wnher,.arinoar n and Diem.T.—I,and 1)949.5M.1117 if?949.474.7056 Govemmenlsl Agencysppm,eils.No warranties or guaranties deny kind em gi—nr implied by the Amnbeee mcgarc111tec tule.cam 187 a x� F 1 DATE: 05/20/2019 SHADOW STUDY MCG JOB#: 17359.00 MAY 1-31,2019(6:00pm.) HUNTINGTON BEACH CONDOS DATE REVISIONS • 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacfi,,��x{' sufmf�Qm 1;.1;i ARCM IF(:IS 1.11 All—1115 RPS(RVEO Irvine,Caffernia 9W 18 NOTE,,,.,nter,nat 11­—1 nnatnra HUNTINGTON BEACH,92648 'T.ilaffil1117 f 949.474.70% adpItl,,Mt,pwdmg tonee�—lcal—"01M,renam.and � t Governmental Agenry approvaN No warranties a pwrant�es An,A.� M any kind arrt given or mpl�eA by gw AmtMeti mcgafC111[dura.com 168 o l 4 DATE. 05/20/2019 SHADOW STUDY MCG S—:f 17359.00 SEPTEMBER 1-30,2019(6:00am.) HUNTINGTON BEACH CONDOS DATE REVISIONS 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica, Suite 280 NOTEAH rr,� 1 All i It ' t 1 s 8t m HUNTINGTON BEACH,92648 Irvine,California 92618 Iy NOTE.Th inlonnal narceptual 1 a aM n auhjM lu atl;ustnrent,p,,Ja N v ilka o —]OWN Tema a,A 949-U.1117 F,949.474.70M Go lal A—e app als.No warranh9a«puararnres a any kna are pivm«ir.mlrae rn rv,�a�nna�t mcgan:IlltwWre.com 189 y� ik G� s� 4 J `i t a pi m � a ir , i DATE: 05/20/2019 SHADOW STUDY MCG JOB#: 17359.00 SEPTEMBER 1-30,2019(11:00am.) HUNTINGTON BEACH CONDOS DATE REVISIONS 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica, Suite 280 N MCGANCMTrowliECTS bIJ ALrptualiTSRESEPV I. HUNTINGTON BEACH,92648 Irvine,Califomia 9261B NOTE:TMs iMormatign is cannapival in natur®and I.wblect ro adjustments pending NNter—it..o and OlianA Tana.,and T 949.50.1117 TD 949.474.7056 Gars S—rai Agency approvals.No wetra.ies or puaranli. {, of any kind are glven or implied by the Metal— mcgarchltecture.cam 190 n . � r r ,yh �IY,ar i w } � I I DATE: 05/20/2019 SHADOW STUDY MCG JOB#: 17359.00 SEPTEMBER 1-30,2019(04:30pm.) HUNTINGTON BEACH CONDOS DATE REVISIONS 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica, Suite 280 Q MCG ARCHITECTS 2017 ALL RIGHTS RESERVER HUNTINGTON BEACH,92648 Irvine,California 92618 NOTE:This Intermation Is conceptual in nature and g eetlem 1. a�>�nente pending a,aher miapation and Client,Tenant,and T 949.W.1117 1)949A74.7056 Governmental Agency antIl ls.No warn as or geeraMies d any kind ara given nr imprma cy the Aran eo. r11GA8rCf11teClUte.CIN11 191 �I II • ,a P, Nohow AW 1-11% Pri116 DATE: 05/20/2019 SHADOW STUDY MCG JOB#: 17359.00 SEPTEMBER 1-30, 2019(04:00pm.) HUNTINGTON BEACH CONDOS DATE REVISIONS . 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica, Suite 2m 0 MCC ARCHITECTS M7 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IllI I HUNTINGTON BEACH,92648 Irvine,Caiifomia 92618 NOTE Is'.This inlormelion n pn natwa 1r ix subject to ad1„stmaIts penda,g mRnar„ari WIon ar OmM Tarrant,and 'Y.I 949.553.1117 '.��949.4J�.7056 Governm Agency epprova4a-No wYrantiaY a p,mramiaa cl anY k d mind ara pivan nr ir,gtlieM W H,e Arcngecl. megarcletecture,m 192 T pp�, 0 e sawe Is ni �p r II � I� y, i #r ,a. DATE: 05/20/2019 SHADOW STUDY MCG JOB#: 17359.00 NOVEMBER 1-30,2019{3:30pm) HUNTINGTON BEACH CONDOS DATE REVISIONS 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacifica, WIN 2M M�;A NIICG,sgo, AllRIGHTSNFs`" Woe,Califomia9261B N01 E_ThI,i,,,nrmalinn is mn�a�,aal�n nal�re a�R�bl�,In HUNTINGTON BEACH,92648 a a la pe dn,g ludher a a<albn a v Gl—,Tananl.and T 1949.553.1117 '949.474.7056 Covernmenlal Agoncy a ImAs.No wananams w gwranl" nt anY kind ara givan or Mliad b,t, AI,,- mcgarchbetum.com 193 BECSP Residential Projects — Completed 5/2019 ve. Fd' lger Ay ©- cc 1. Name: Avalon (3.8 acres/mixed use) Address: 7302-7400 Center Avenue # Units: 378 units 2. Name: Boardwalk (12.5 acres/mixed use) Address: 7441 Edinger Ave. # Units: 487 units q 3. Name: Luce (8.5 acres/MFR) Address: 7262, 7266, 7280 Edinger Ave. 16001, 17091 Gothard Street # Units: 510 units } 4. Name: Oceana (2 acres/MFR) -- � -- Address: 18151 Beach Blvd. # Units: 78 units _ I 5. Name: Elan (2.7 acres/mixed use) Address: 18502, 18508-18552 Beach Blvd. Talbed Ay # Units: 274 units EL _.. 6. Name: Beach & Ocean (3.2 acres/MFR) Address: 19891 Beach Blvd. Cr E # Units: 173 units Ave — z'`y Ell Av .c Total Residential Units — 1,900 a C7 v} arfield Ave. c town v_e__ _. t[[, O N Z Q E L Adams NTS 194 SITE SUMMARY ZONING:BEACH-EDINGER SPECIFIC PLAN-SP-14 APN: 157-341-04,07 8 08 LAND: 0.955 AC 41,210S.F OCCUPANCY: R-2(M CONSTRUCTKNJ TYPE: IIIA BUILDING: 88.511 S.F. 3 FLOOR AREA: - - s II STREETLEVEL 15.57E SF 81 SECOND LEVEL 17,470 SF 818g11 THIRD LEVEL 17,470 SF 1 s ROOF DECK LEVEL 6.810 SF TOTAL FLOOR AREA 57,328 SF gg�I rL 1 I I I PARKING AREA: HI�1 i nnn L L J J I� J I 1 ,.rtfu waau , r , , I PMgNG LEVEL 1 28,751 SF FI I I- lox rvw rcnamn an alone w-m I PARKING LEVEL 28.751 SF PARKING LEVEL 3 10,784 SF TOTAL PARKING AREA e4,298 SF 1 I I I 1 I NUMBER OF UNITS _ I STREET LEVEL 12 UNITS AID-III I 2ND T03RD LEVEL 29 UNITS _ ___-__-___________ ROOF DECK LEVEL 7UNITS wweenry we-ara TOTAL UNITS 48 UNITS -AHU=AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT.4.6-UNITS REQUIRED.DEVELOPER WILL BE PROVIDING 5 UNITS. 2 ND FLOOR PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 7157,IN BOOK 157,PAGE 340E ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE. A MER THDT INVESTMENTS LWIF W.BTH ST.I202 CORONA.CA WW2 951 51]8 __L_______________ SALIMTHEONE®YAHOO.COM r__ muFmr une mo e-enTaws__ �-� _ APPLICANT MCG ARCHITECTURE/JEFF HERBST O L_015�_.I III PACIFICA.4280 afl IRVINE.CA92618 r.F r r - C - c 4 n � I w� JHERB.111] JHEW11117 CGARCHITECTURE.COM �z zam 1 v uz T w,ol' I w ,.n o, --_wu u,n,.I � rMl I T•z ea,mm,mp rep R-,r warq- wuw.. �rO xyE� W - e�� I wc,me rw. r EN1pUL*.1 „ Nun wmrcee noon Mx nay, r, U) UNIT J -occaurne 9 I I.II ST LWr. uNoe xa onnEw• wwLcws.rrr Free 'u""�`w'r� n, w,.omw. o-,..aa,w YI .aocrosCf I �� oFw.0 a non rtow89am rw,q I mL wus � A STREET LEVEL ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS SITE PLAN& ACG JOB I: 117.M.U, FIRST&SECOND FLOOR PLANS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-2 DATE REVISIONS 111 Pacifica,Sub 280 to OWn9 REVISED PER12-MISGOENTS Scale: 1•=20'-0• 8041 ELLISAVENUE MM04/ty19 CRY COMMENTS REVISION Irvine,CelBomis 92618 yd o919 REVISEDIOFAHUS f z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92848 T�961M.1117 F,948.474.70W 05p1n9 REVISED AHUS TO 5 TOTAL 0 10' 20' 40mcgffd*Kwm.com : hut= M Accident Rates Before and After Elan Development Accident Rate Accident Rate Location Before After Elan Development Elan Development Beach Blvd/Ellis Ave* 0.68 0.62 Ellis Ave/Patterson Ln* 0.11 0.15 Beach Blvd (Ellis Ave - Graziadio Dr)** 7.5 6.4 Ellis Ave (Beach Blvd - Goodwin Ln)** 12.7 12.4 *intersection accident rate per million entering vehicles **street segment accident rate per million vehicle miles traveled Before rates calculated based on 3 years of data prior to development After rates calculated based on 3 years of data after development 196 Project Trip Generation Compared to Elan Development Ellis Condo Project Trip Generation: Elan Development Trip Generation: Daily Trips - 351 Daily Trips - 1 ,822 AM Peak Hour Trips - 22 AM Peak Hour Trips - 140 PM Peak Hour Trip - 27 PM Peak Hour Trip - 169 197 Intersection Level-of- Service (LOS) Analysis* Volume/Capacity Ratio Existing Existing PM Acceptable Remaining at Acceptable AM Peak Peak Hour LOS per City LOS (D) with Project (AM Intersection Hour LOS* LOS* Policy Peak Hour/ PM Peak Hour) Beach Boulevard / Talbert Avenue B D D 0.31 / 0.10 Beach Boulevard / Garfield Avenue B C D 0.25 / 0.18 Beach Boulevard / Ellis Avenue A B D 0.37 / 0.29 * Intersection Capacity Utilization Methodology (ICU) 198 LEGEND.• HUNT/NG T®N BEACH CONDOS _L 9 ° r APN 157-341-07, 04 08 PZ'PAv£MfNI CONCEPTUAL GRADING PL AN PR"'E" //V THE C/TY OF HUNT/NCION &j-ACH COUIVTY OF ORANGE a MARCH 2O7.9 *l' I I �kEf c E I srsrcM I NLYNLTY NAP _ 6V0rr JB RrM ° I +qr ro KKF 3600 rN B"/W)J RAr r'NLGJ�1 owMRn I tUAC AU r l� r 1 NT�N1 Rk�nr <ttsr FafFLENr-� 10.L $ F/ .NB -♦_6J91.rbi r9�wf6r [) I '�q JO !�]I I SFr rG ,55 r°rm �w =rrB 91Y 03im� �e�r� �BC I CW wA[ p r 1>1 I PEF MCM 2 PUNS E N.�. EU rG E�y E 36'Ornev / 66]uAx.BCIx rvwG wKL- 66W IA,,L �, 1 ��\ � it;�u,, ExrsrrNc i R � r _ I O rfNCf C Bf �3' 13' 6`rt FLKr 212T+ � 5>.Hr MW rB.IXY� - .• .. . .'.' _ T ..._ '. lG 1 K NC M5 4[ -', FCraNm•6 '� • ; . . .' .�..:.. ' :�:�� ¢ � � AM1YY-lPf PROPO3f0 6'. - f G4 1 .. g p (caucaa II a cuae B rul>!:R A }nflro P421 b o SECTION A A I -------------------- Q I L»d !ra 601 OS.r C' [=699"O OSZ E F5 bbl'MAx-A—wKL J 6°OJaV RA HR 5rATLSTLCAL LNFORMAT/ON r _ - ____a___________________ ___-. rwon ire E;�nvERfv asc.-.ouen-smRr R<s.¢r ue eew°os z<ErEr s or Ex. [•wasuac� PAFxIM1G PE[OW CRU[rNO.BuaOrNC ri 3/NO r(COR CONSiSfENI rrfRWLNOU/. r Ex T AA'II1G SWAGE +'OANRJN RChr 5C!AFCGaIECrURA!PINS fOR A°°r>K>Na°EI a3 6[IFMC 'n Cx. I ro FC M1LNTED �E�J� P-O M/A"EO USf Ex I r o - 4 1A14/K PFOPoSE MIXCO USE E+ I 1 !O h SECT/ON B—B P�7f[RI RE 0.93 Al -- e LX aew I - -r.! • .. N 75. b souwf rrEr.r rc" I ceNE.v r f � R ox M<e n rAMa r CwrGUNcs z '.. 520g xr BORM r fNc \ V 4 1 BORM 1 SPACCS( fNC C M J+R°RM 13 sPACEs Em;o E .. ELL/5 A✓ENUE +i +.ea F REuoLE aNe 6ULSf PARkMG OS 3 CES Pf ' RFLAC£fx FA'.B�CCrtS AMJ CVIhA Ex 5°E a.t' Mrhl:PROIHOQO IN UNOE NO IA— rRC,PGExSE SCE RE tE xRCFNFCZF[ LWs FOR PAR.riNG COUN)B°EraGS c rOtC Ex - fE 4 11822r PgOP°SEO CWNECnON f0 Exi3nNG vU6[K SEWER Mai✓ry w[ i U[vfR� EGGl ALFNUf 10' ° +' 2 w.r r Prorosfo coNN c ww Io xrsf w. E NE rN E�r3 A7Rr�r SECTION C—C SECTION O—D -rur-6'nrr. a rsrr-.-masrrc __fir;Raxxnw CNNRtx'c ra sfww-es ENG/NEER' N 7 S N T 5. QRyyB�[.sWnKRGr r0 A Pw°PoSCC vlRxwbr CU[I'CR,/ENcf xxr ENcrNCCRS SCPLE I"-1o' sHEEr rNwesrrerr Iawae°s BEAcrr ew rN o AN ExrmNL oRVNACE srRGrinrRf �Beo caMProN ALrN c surrf r°o APPL/CANT/OIYNER' __ _ ORON.G 91BBr-JJ>O p'0.M[OPMEM,GGC rmM•rrn c°r'ra (93/J IrJO DntE.}/OS/2019 1 lJB)W 6nV SIRfA Sff 1°2 r _r¢Bm rrG /93r1 zn-JJoe F x io.�1�zeel ENO//VEERS - .UJ-9, CY CONIACn BRAMBON BARNf]/PE ;9AS/J B9J-r90[+ DESIGNED BWP .�nm.K.�am�. ^M awi�rro.n�+ry:i NEI=9.69.5 11 SPoaB EMAr['BA DON.B49NEI1AAA'IfCENG fERSCOM rR u[lM - - - -P OF I SHEETS N Dote ey ry E V I I O N S CHECKED BB • mcg architecture April lb, 2019 `FCE'VED APR 22 2019 Dept,0` City of Huntington Beach COr�r�unlpQ�.glQm°nt Planning Department 2000 Main Street, 3rd Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REGARDING Parking Management Plan Huntington Beach Condos, Ellis &Beach CUP#17-042 To whom it may concern: The proposed development will provide for 128 total off street parking spaces. As currently designed all parking will be underground with 53 total parking spaces on the first sub-grade level, 53 parking spaces on the second sub-grade level and 22 parking spaces on the third sub- grade level. Vehicular Access to the parking area will be from a new 24'-0"wide drive aisle adjacent to the building extending north from Ellis Avenue approximately 295', then ramping down to the first sub-grade level. Each of the ramps that connect the levels to one another will not exceed 10% in slope.Also, ramps will not project into the required maneuvering spaces for vehicles as they enter/leave parking spaces. Residents &patrons may access the parking levels from within the building via the elevator or one of the 3-stairways provided. Parking stalls shall be designed and striped in accordance with City of Huntington Beach Zoning Ordinance Chapter 231.The surface of the parking facility will be paved with non-slip concrete. Parking level one consists of 31 standard stalls for residences, 3 accessible parking stalls, 2 stalls designated for clean air vehicles, 5 stalls to serve the retail component and 12 stalls reserved for tenant guest parking-totaling 53. Parking level two consists of 36 standard stalls for residences, 3 accessible parking stalls, 2 stalls designated for clean air vehicles and 12 stalls reserved for tenant guest parking-totaling 53. Parking level three consists of 17 standard stalls for residences, 3 accessible parking stalls and 2 stalls designated for clean air vehicles -totaling 22. Parking levels one and two also provide for short term bicycle parking, storage for long term bicycle parking and a separate storage room with reserved lockers for tenants. Retail.Entertainment.Hospitality.Office CLEVELAND • DENVER • GLENDORA - IRVINE • SAN FRANCISCO 200 O 949.553,1117 O 949.474.7056 111 Pacifica,Suite 280 Irvine,CA 92618 Error! Reference source not found. Error! Reference source not found. Error! Reference source not found. Page 2 As provided the parking accommodates the 2 required stalls per residential unit, .5 stalls per unit for guest parking and 5 stalls for the proposed retail tenant- totaling 125 required and 128 provided stalls. While there are no assigned/reserved parking stalls, other than those designated for Retail, Guest Parking and as required by law, the parking garage will only remain open between the hours of 9am to 9pm. Beyond those hours the only access will be provided to tenants via a scan card used at the gate for entry/exit. In each level there will be sufficient lighting and security cameras to provide for a safe environment as tenants and guests transition to/from the parking levels. Yours truly, MCG ARCHITECTURE Jeff Herbst, Project Director cc File FILE: Ocmnett2(204-1.5) 201 ,eCVNED . mcg architecture � 2I" pe��pt Commun�Y ae`e�pmes� September 13, 2018 City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street, 3rd Floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 REGARDING Huntington Beach Condos, Ellis &Beach Sustainabiliry Narrative MCG Project No. 17.359.05 To whom it may concern: The project as depicted in the submitted exhibits is to be designed in compliance with the 2016 California Green Building Residential Mandatory Measures. Components will include at a minimum the following; 1. Minimal site disturbance wherever possible (with the intention to maintain existing slopes). 2. Storm water/erosion control measures during construction. 3. Provisions for future EV charging stations/parking stalls. 4. Drought tolerant landscaping and irrigation in compliance with MWELO Ordinance. 5. Water conserving plumbing fixtures (water closets, faucets, shower heads). 6. Construction waste management plan in harmony with waste stream reduction goal to achieve less than 21bs./per square foot of building area in alignment for 65% reduction. 7. Prepare building maintenance/operation manuals for both tenants and building owner. 8. Trash recycle area for tenants. 9. Providing building materials to comply with VOC limits within code. 10. Manually operable windows with screens for natural ventilation as an aid to indoor air quality and environmental comfort beyond that provided by mechanical means. Beyond the Mandatory Measures, this project has/will be designed to align with specific Voluntary Measures as follows; 1. Site selection consistent with City of Huntington Beach General Plan and regional public transportation to further comply with environmental sustainability. Retail,Entertainment.Hospitality.Office CLEVELAND • DENVER • GLENDORA • IRVINE • SAN FRANCISCO 202 O 949.553.1117 OO 949.474.7056 111 Pacifica,Suite 280 Irvine,CA 9261E Page 2 2. Strive to comply as a Transit Priority Project in conjunction with SCAG requirements. Site is located to maintain community connectivity with residents and local basic services (to include banks, churches, parks, grocery stores, retail, dental, vision, healthcare)all within 1/4 mile of project. 3. Reduction of heat island affect at parking areas by locating tenant and retail parking below grade. 4. We propose to use high albedo materials at the patio surfaces to align with cool roof requirements. 5. Outdoor lighting is proposed to be in compliance with light pollution reduction. The above measures listed are merely an overview of those proposed. The projects construction documents will define the complete compliance measures. Yours truly, MCG ARCHITECTURE Jeff Herbst, Project Director CC File FLLE: Dw mad(2047.5) 203 Mitigation Monitoring Checklist for Ellis Condos '7;1 r:4crq 'iSA"Y�""' "•e{rynriJia..Fr, a •J., r 5 J ,r r •: n�. n •r: 1'T .S• >l{ l ..r°.r, e J •Yr.'ry rr..r..r+•Y1: i. .+r "i' r•u' :„i—._....:r:;;:Y:•r y:,..Y.. iv.....,r .;-:,;;,... fr.... n,: .�. ` ••Ek'... �,:. .:� •.... " ,� m' . .I.,.,'afr:, .S' :a.'u ,i1 e ,.��'' •{ ":a�- � .t{ ,�.. ...._: _ ....,.,.:.,.:.,L.,.rr :, .�- fr,,. i�n�. ( 4.'rl'•t , Y'3� t 4.y r ••°i c!r' ,<r. „r T r •I, r_. ..r •�, ,.r t:. r .I ..c>, .,t;• , :7 i., al.. 1, .4. i J' r..'t V M6'.• .fa .r.::•Y'e+r., "r�:-',t r , t. ., t ; '1.'1F. •7. e).. :.3�,l"�, l•.k.t .� l n..l z. Y• 4.t t•n .I rt..•I f^•: •.a �.v v.-a. <is . • .rl•! {., f:. i:i. r;,! .'�.:':'1'1' /X:.i 1_ i• r;� J -d i-.• i r P..ci pr I i r. ,j'.a`•' � t'{" :.,f�lf""•••`�,. .1.:.IV ;a."Y•rSi,:. .�..t: �4... S : .dal. � r i'Yt .� I, •`n'ni, k 'rr � .5 T:•t .erns. '$`' iZ4. '/ 'Fi' ! t. .t•,..�:.......:... .ra•••' 1 •r . : . r. ll t, 1... ,..i• -s.: :.r •r.. ..:-10 :•Y t1a,l.. "Sp :i. t .�. .�: ,.:, , •IJ :...w�u r t � ,u 4 .::•+r_: :..,.:... •' .::,:: i i t..c s. ,n. f a, �• +�f�11{.}. : .....:.,... ..1. .... , ,.r,.�9i st,�. .+,.t.. tt�`{. ��t( .c..1:..r.., yyjy,,,�.���, .,J, ,...,...... ' !`l�tiyt: •'{yI .,.Y,. ..,1,..4.q,M,..! r.. f. 'PX?.J,SFl:?.�1:. .. Yfll(:-. .f� ':'{`,{'• ,.,V. '{.I::•' 'b. . .. lYv, •.,f' n: ./„x. +:Y,. ..,.. s ,,::.::.,..r.. .,...... .. �.J:...1.:.::•..s::i!IITI/(/ _a.,.:.. '.:.:..e::i5 _ :(.. I.. _.!. rul�r.li � :,1,::�. .... .. , ... .... ... .J, r r ... .. :. ...... —.. ... _. ...... .......:....:::... ..r. ,.... ... r.. .r,..,_..-.sr r..... ... !,• • r r , ..t .. .. ... ........ r. ... �...s !:rt:::i:.e...:.<..•, }. rtt MM4.1-1 For projects that may result in a potential shade/shadow impact Shade/Shadow Plan check Analysis to be prepared&submitted'during plan on nearby fight-sensitive uses, the following mitigation measure shall be analysis to be priorto check process. implemented at the Co's discretion: prepared prior to issuance of Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall be required to issuance of building building Since the buildings longest axis runs north-south, perform a shade and shadow analysis that demonstrates that the project permit, permit the main effect would.be the adjacent residential will not result in significant impacts according to the following criteria. on the east side-one with solar panels,which Shadowing impacts in the Specific Plan boundary are considered would be affected in the later afternoon hours. significant when shadows would be cast upon potentially sensitive uses Other than this no impacts to light sensitive during a substantial portion (greater than 50 percent)of the main daylight areas would result. hours (9:00 A.M_ to 3:00 P.M. during the fall, winter, and spring seasons, and 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. [daylight savings time] during the summer season). Light-sensitive uses are those that depend upon light for their operation(e.g.,solar panels)or for which solar access is essential for their function (e.g., swimming pools). Light-sensitive uses also include public parks and routinely useable outdoor spaces associated with residences and schools(e.g.,yards and playgrounds). MM4.1.2 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize the use Building plans Plan check We will address in construction documents of non-reflective fagade treatments, such as matte paint or glass coatings, prior to during plan check process and apply Prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project,the Applicant issuance of treatments/protectives. Most of the buildings shall indicate provision of these materials on the building plans. building exterior is covered by,matte finish elements. permit Glazing will be coateflo min_glare .... .. ., , .. :. a. ..•... .... .. .. .: 1. •+:l.tii:';%+:::i::,:'i r:::::::::: .. , 1... .. _..,.. ..... .I.. ........... ...:...:......:..�:........,. `rN.tt:i:ii;•'s'.'n::::i :i:t i•,i':::j:'i::::;�;:e';: :e.r.., i : , ,.. .. ,t•.. .+ .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. ..... ..1.::,....,'... .3t:..,:.:...I i!:;i'7? +i;^:i!i;'iY. MM4.2-1 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to Grading Plans during plan diesel-powered equipment used will be retrofitted with after-treatment and notes on grading priorto check. products (e,g,, engine catalysts). Contract specifications shall be included plans issuance of in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of agrading Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. permit rn MM4.2-2 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that all Contract language Plan check T77 Notes will be added toGrading Plans during plan heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment operating and refueling at the and notes on grading prior to s as < check. project site use low-NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily available plans issuance of , and cast effective(up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air Resources a grading m Board diesel)in the South Coast Air Basin (this does not apply to diesel- permit powered trucks traveling to and from the project site). Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM4.2.3 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to,`Grading Plans during plan construction equipment engines be maintained in good condition and in and notes on grading priorto check. proper tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of issuance of Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 204 1 I M1 NO211 X'§ docum permit MM41-8 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to Grading Plans during plan temporary traffic controls are provided, such as a flag person, during all and notes on grading priorto check. phases of construction to facilitate smooth traffic flow. Contract plans and construction issuance of specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction plans a grading documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. permit MM4.2-9 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to,Grading Plans during plan construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system be and notes on grading priorto check. scheduled to off-peak hours (10:00A.M. to 4:00P.m.). Contract plans and construction issuance of specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction plans a grading documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. permit MM4.2-10 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added ta:Grading Plans during plan dedicated on-site and off-she left-turn lanes on truck hauling routes be and notes on grading priorto check. utilized for movement of construction trucks and equipment on site and off plans and construction issuance of site to the e)ftW feasible during construction activities. Contract plans a grading specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction permit documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. MM4-2-11 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, whichever Is Mail to owners& Plan check Notification to take pla6e after permit is issued. issued earlier, notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants of all occupants within 300 prior to developed land uses within 300 feet of a project site within the Specific feet of project site a issuance of Plan providing a schedule for major construction activities that will occur notice regarding major a grading or through the duration of the construction period. In addition,the notification construction activities building will include the Identification and contact number for a community liaison permits, and designated construction manager that would be available on site to which occur monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be earlier responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PMjD generation. The construction manager Will be located at the on-site construction office during construction hours for the duration of all construction activities, Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager will be located at the construction office, City Hall, the police department,and a sign on site. MM4.2-12 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to Architectural Plans during the architectural coating (paint and primer) products used would have a and notes on grading priorto plan check. VOC rating of 125 grams per liter or less. Contract specifications shall be plans and construction issuance of included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be plans a grading reviewed and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. permit MM4.2-13 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to Architectural Plans during materials that do not require painting be used during construction to the and notes on grading prior to plan check. extent feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed plans and construction issuance of project construction documents,which shall be reviewed and approved by plans a grading the City of Huntington Beach. permit Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 206 3 �W- Hu s g", MM4.2-14 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Architect will insure that pre-painted/finished pre-painted construction materials be used to the extent feasible.Contract and notes on grading prior to materials to be specified where feasible. specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction plans and construction issuance of documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of plans a grading Huntington Beach. permit M1914.3-1 Nesting avian species protected by the MBTA: Developer shalt Plan check Survey will be performed prior to any site work. a. Prior to any construction or vegetation removal between February 15 submit construction prior to and August 31,a nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified schedule(including Issuance of biologist of all habitats within 250 feet of the construction area. grading activities)as a grading Surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days and no more than evidence of permit 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities and surveys construction overlap will be conducted in accordance with CDFG protocol as applicable.If with breeding season. no active nests are identified on or within 250 feet of the construction If construction occurs site,no further mitigation is necessary.A copy of the pre-construction during relevant survey shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach.If an active breeding,developer nest of a MBTA protected species is identified onsite(per established shall present a survey thresholds)a 100-foot no-work buffer shall be maintained between the report(prepared by a nest and construction activity.This buffer can be reduced in consultant approved consultation with CDFG and/or USFWS, by the City)to the City b. Completion of the nesting cycle shall be determined by qualified prior to issuance of a During ornithologist or biologist, grading permit If construction nests are found, developer shall submit plans identifying nest locations and limits of construction activities, MM4.3-2 Welland Habitat If it is determined that Plan check Not applicable. Existing land is currently a. For projects located on vacant(nondeveloped)land, preparation of a a project is taking prior to developed. No wetlands are present. wetland delineation shall be required as deemed necessary by the City place on an issuance of of Huntington Beach.The delineation shall be conducted in undeveloped parcel of grading accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation land,and a wetland permit Manual,and the September 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps delineation is deemed of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:Arid West Region necessary by the City, (Version 2.0),The delineation report shall be prepared and submitted preparation of a to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USACE)for their verification.A wetland delineation copy of the USACE's verification letter and the delineation report shall must occur be provided to the City of Huntington Beach. If no wetlands are present on the project site,no additional measures shall be required, b. Prior to the issuance of grading permits by the City,if wetlands are present on the project site(based on the verified wetland delineation), the project applicant shall acquire all applicable wetland permits, These permits include,but would not be limited to,a Section 404 4 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring C3qckJist +�{., its::+ ({,,:. :.•\t:......f.>. ..:.:. .... .. ..: •. .c,r .. J ,S r ._.. ,S. ... n.,,.r I { rt ,v; .„ ,i'.� r. ,l. I• r y .t....<,.r.•...:.:.. ,..s .. >..,4. .,., ,•.. .. ,{..>. ,,.. ,, :'l., ..# : . .1 .a. ,, )i ..5, r"= 2... .•J<cc' J f�Jk':�n: .W r. r s ,. • l t hFf'A•....... Y ,[• J<. a ,A,. .r,e2 }k -v7Jx 37 :,1': a3 �'�4' ter. 1<,L,.:t:' �r`•,.' I J u ,,1• .'ttr. ,:.I t .;`Y�l,• J t(..,.t. ! . •_, f;,,, 'r` ,.. ., .:r,f ,.,,.,...1 r �_. „ .,,•,:.,: .. ,.1. of ... ..;,... t ,( •V.:n,yr .. f tt ++. yy . r .• :' +i..,. •..)f <'.1"�,. , ,.. t ,# �•!'• ^1 � s, .t a y +r1,:•r 2- 1• �;Y eau. ` h. �+/ :.J, t 1., F.ii U ':,I'' ./r .Y, '�r�:4:r.r .1':: .5,i•:. I•t .,., .I S r ., n w. Mr. ••- ..i .M,f:, i..ir.i i.;J !?i',11:'. , tj„ =E ff ,,.�I x >a is �' t? 1 f µ.. u .. u� ' Jf tX� ,{.7;,y'•° J �r�. r.•r ,.(� lk,t ,J I r � ,/ 1 y t ,.>. t., -rr: :.� ;•.,,. err ,<.,;,..h „�:�. 7::':1 .5 .t• .t ,1 �,.•l.. .1 l .f,rS , .l �t r= ..�UIYI� .�{� `�.c. ,.�r. ,S..i..i ,tA:'�1�.?,t.:;a et:".,:,,!:. p..•:..r`r.lf...`� ..r:,f .. ,gg. ., :., ,� :,`: f.. a is 6 .1 ,t. �.�• � .l :�/Y;• 't!.. ,y�,�,,, .#`-Y�,:.}: a 'N....#. 4,.. ... ._r .•.:..,r. ,,. ....r,,,, t, .... 1.••. t.l 1 .t. r. t ,1 ,I .r . ..:,. •�, .. . , .: Mc>c, t{' .t< ,4 „� J !Vk r >` ,,. I .r r t 4L 1. 1 f.r{ f.�: �J{+ �. � � 1,i. 1•x. ..-,. ,1F ,} :I r„ �ii v�� :@�` 'I v!;,r. .1•... :+.. - G• .Fa. .,1 :,r-- �, ,.5 1 ,J.t a' �,. I �v „t' In l,r""' .�.._... t r..3 nr•F, r^t r 1 ,.p. d S i. .� :y+f t r :r, (, .� t,f: r..>. n Z. :f,t a 1[.t.fl (,, il,.. } r.{V:,A .rl JJ !A 1! b C, rt�r .. r. .r•�!.•:�"O J: Y,I t., i�ar r,,.., tii 'a7. .l.. ?(`l`+( ;•:r r E iS t, ��77 .1'.,'. .,r .S,�1.,5,1.f.,,lF.R:lt%2..tA:S�al,u l., ll •.571 Ttir ..11,Ua i7 yit 1J� >s l..l U.,I .r•t. ,-F�.P+4,, ..ir �,I �f.': ,-SfSt i'F`.. t ir1 F >.U.. 1.t.t r ;r: :'v'S�'v•:':}.••{SR/C7Ca���R4f:.;�1[ �Y{�'ffsi;l/•.,ri,LR^.��:711 � r `` ,.t#. ,r;t .:. •. I" - .,.f,-h.,. � � :, 11 :::�. ....: ..:.:.'.:.t,.n �..V:: ,.-4s;\e.:'.ti ��l1'1 ')�1 : 'A�i•• ��.:<i):1Y1"ti'S�11f., Wetlands Fill Permit from the USAGE,or a Report of Waste Discharge Not applicable. Existing land is currently from the Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB),and a developed. No wetlands are present. Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the RWCQB.Additionally, a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game(CDFG)would be required for development that would cross or affect any stream course(including the Barge Canal), c. The project applicant shall,where feasible,preserve the maximum amount of existing wetlands and establish minimum 25-to 5D-foot buffers around all sides of these features.In addition,the final project design shall not cause significant changes to the pre-project hydrology, water quality,or water quantity in any wetland that is to be retained on site.This shall be accomplished by avoiding or repairing any I disturbance to the hydrologic conditions supporting these wetlands,as verified through wetland protection plans. d. Where avoidance of existing wetlands and drainages is not feasible, then mitigation measures shall be implemented for the project-related lass of any existing wetlands on site,such that there is no net loss of wetland acreage or habitat value. Wetland mitigation shall be developed as a part of the Section 404 CWA permitting process,or for nonjurisdictional wetlands,during permitting through the RWQCB and/or CDFG. Mitigation is to be provided prior to construction related impacts on the existing wetlands.The exact mitigation ratio Is variable,based on the type and value of the wetlands affected by the project,but agency standards typically require a minimum of 1:1 for preservation and 1:1 for construction of new wetlands.In addition,a wetland mitigation and monitoring plan shall be developed that includes the following: ■ Descriptions of the wetland types, and their expected functions and values ■ Performance standards and monitoring protocol to ensure the success of the mitigation wetlands Over a period of five to ten years ■ Engineering plans showing the location,size and configuration of wetlands to be created or restored e An implementation schedule showing that construction of mitigation areas shall commence prior to or concurrently with the initiation of construction A description of legal protection measures for the preserved wetlands(i.e., dedication of fee title, conservation easement, and/or an endowment held by an approved conservation organization, government agency or mitigation bank) Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 208 5 rior Proof of retention of Plan check A survey will be conducted by cultural resource ---. . ._ _ --.--,_-__.----_- ---- _~'_-.~ ....~~. physically affect buildings or structures 45 years old or older or affect their an historical resource priorto professional prior to any constructiorVdemolition. historic setting, the project applicant shall retain a cultural resource professional to issuance of professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional determine potential demolition In an initial review no existing structures are Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine if the project significance of or grading listed with the city as historical. would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical structure 45 years old permit, resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The or older whichever investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the cultural occurs resource professional and the City of Huntington Beach, the appropriate eadier ar&val research,including,if necessary,an updated records search of the South Central Coastad Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System and a pedestrian survey of the proposed development area to determine if any significant historic-period resources would be adversely affected by the proposed development,The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources. The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources identified In the technical report or memorandum. I 6 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring C-409 hecklist MI. RV,pT say=i'f' :Er1,g•%uUa0,it:kp)tr: ;},::M.a.r „1.•, :'�» i. .r rr..,..o.. pr,... Vi. .,S ., .i +2.t r. n,.. )., ,ul l:r.,,.,... �kl t .1 �..\ t ✓1 f} aE t�✓I t�1: f'r[, / r'�'-V':I .f 1, a� [.Jr. ,.�. ,a r. {{ •;t, ,t !� �1ti ia.;''•::fa•r�• f t ,t!'r r, t. 1. '44,:"'� ,s � t. r..Y r 1. .<•>:,' 4�. ':gym„ ,�. { 1...,. ,:1+ r. `fh: J..(';I t•i: ,r> .,� .J. :o. t.. f .s: , 4' �.YI .i� J.t .I c.>{• 1, { 1. 1:1•,r}(i .L %t..< (( r�. / ` Lt f ar �:. I .. .ri,l.. :.�„, ^...r,, '.i`. ..,y;.,,s:+ur,,- ,r.,... •rf. 59, `5{: i � } [� ��. .,.�:. ,:i..,... ....fr11'I I .1ftt ) .7 .I j 1 I1,,,(fff' 1 L T., ..1. ,.l •41. .'�F S ��.)..'� .� t},. .;i...e• Lu.• ,: +•h!ar. at.. .SC •{ ..f. BI ,c a.1 1 k 111 ' >}.. .J• ,r• 1 ,'a v L t dgJir•. , .1 r ,5}-',•.".n.. :.�rw'I 7 {c;., 3•„ ,f .11!'u.) I�'�'r S.y '1'• .s? rh 1 � I{ 7 ./ Y, Po rJ•.C..m.: +,. „AA �� U�.1,•• yt,yip rrrL (s}}>1. //l srt } .r,f 'I{,iFF1...,f•,ar. ,•rr.....�,,7„q l:'.f1d.51f: l1rN.it ,+L',' 'g4;.{,. rl,k:. '!. i !11 rl r C t i, ai.. a.lt.;,J•/ta4?� !r�}2 Fr,. r.e. rrYt7h .Jt�lll.f..:1:, n�1' m,i`J7•r.':a1Ji`it.lt'{„{'r'-.a:r;;�.r:Ci4�r.�f�llma���..•� �I��;r{..,. ! it ;•t" f � I ' MM4.4-2(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, 'Proof of retention of Plan check A survey will be conducted by an archaeologist trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project archaeological prior to prior to any construction/demolition. applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the professional to issuance of Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to determine if a demolition The project area is currently developed so the determine if the project could result in a substantial adverse change in the substantial adverse or grading anticipation that any undisturbed soil is significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5 of change would occur to permit, encountered would be highly unlikely. the CEQA Guidelines or disturb human remains. The investigation shall an archaeological whichever include, as determined appropriate by the archaeologist and the City of resource occurs Huntington Beach,an updated records search of the South Central Coastal earlier Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System, updated Native American consultation, and a pedestrian survey of the area proposed for development.The results of the investigation shall be documented in a technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any archaeological resources within the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources or human remains.The measures shall include,as appropriate,subsurface testing of archaeological resources and/or construction monitoring by a qualified professional and, if necessary, appropriate Native American monitors identified by the applicable tribe (e.g,, the Gabrielft Tongva Nation) and/or the Native American Heritage Commission_The methods shall also include procedures for the unanticipated discovery of human remains, j which shall be in accordance with Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California's Health and Safety Code, The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on archaeological resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to retain an archaeologist shall demonstrate non-disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth- disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils)shall comply with MM4.4 2(b). Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 21 o 7 .......... . ............ 321 MM4.4-2(b) If evidence of an archaeological site or other suspected Proof of retention of Plan check An archaeologist will be retained and the city will historical resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064,5, archaeological prior to be notified with work halted should this be including darkened soil representing past human activity ("midden"), that professional to issuance of encountered and the necessary could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, fired clay vessels, determine if a demollflon requirements/steps met. faunal bone, hearths, storage pits, or burials) are discovered during any substantial adverse or grading project-related earth-disturbing activities (including projects that would not change would occur to permit, Again,since the project will redevelop an existing encounter undisturbed soils), all earth-disturbing activity within 100 feet of an archaeological whichever developed property, it is unlikely that any the find shall be halted and the City of Huntington Beach shall be notified. resource occurs archaeological remains will be found. The project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the earlier Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by the archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-L)form and filed with the appropriate Information Center. MM4.4-3(a) Prior to any earth-disturbing activities (e.g., excavation, Proof of retention of Plan check An paleontologist will be retained and a survey trenching, grading) that could encounter undisturbed soils, the project paleontological prior to will be performed and the report will be issued to applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist to determine if the professional to issuance of the city. project could directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological determine if a demolition resource or site or unique geologic feature.The investigation shall include, substantial adverse or grading Again,since the project will redevelop an existing as determined appropriate by the paleontologist and the City of Huntington change would occur to permit, developed property, it is unlikely that any Beach, a paleontology records check and a pedestrian survey of the area an paleontological whichever pre-historic remains will be found. proposed for development. The results of the Investigation shall be resource occurs documented In a technical report or memorandum that identifies the earlier paleontological sensitivity of the development area and includes recommendations and methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic features.The technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach for approval. As determined necessary by the City, environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for eliminating or avoiding impacts on paleontological resources or unique geologic features identified in the technical report or memorandum. Projects that would not encounter undisturbed soils and would therefore not be required to retain a paleontologist shall demonstrate non- disturbance to the City through the appropriate construction plans or geotechnical studies prior to any earth-disturbing activities. Projects that would include any earth disturbance (disturbed or undisturbed soils)shall comply with MM4.4-3(b), 8 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring 6elcklist 1:.^.i,:i '.'!.! t:):!rvtS::`5` vrerStr 1:." '�fel .It•' i�f°^t., •li:'I '`I - tar r•R. t •'h. I � t %lilt. '"/ r! >•k::.,._:,.,,.p',,:•.:+s, .,,::... ?. .Y....'-': rr,s!.a(`l:++.�%t!n.b �t Ni, 7... '� rd Y: "v' f 't>r':';a: .t\,: r� 1. �' 'F< .3"' '9, sr ::N. r.. ,.•,. '.!- „r... 1 ..t.t a ,r., .!,. t... •{%t r'° `°'6' s °f' ,�.3: i^ f ! ':>:,;. ,:y.• .s. a ,.t.. I F.i a. ,Y ..('1 1 �' r !:� .� .1 •,� ..kt .>:• :'1"> p'r::a,: ,\^^:.w.:. .f 1. t .� ,i 'I t ). �• .'1„ +�, .i,'>:"I. ,c t>. 1, :,� tl• ) �-•{''" , A ,Y' f t .l. x :! t :I� I .t.. a. ,[` 'L f-., ,rr. ! ✓` .rr ,1� F { J /. f.Al r� I ,f t t" f .1�.` '•t I. TY` i! �..JJ l'+ ,a. :t•L / fINA I, ,i�:' ,51: ",a t r. h eIV••. y�,i .f. :f...�.. \. 'tf:'is •''t,+ 1..; C r•:�t �R� r r•. 1, ..u,. t r�, ...A u�Y r.,� ��� rt I •�,(�.fit+- ry -,1�.: ..il`+Yiq }:,.i l• I s..,, I T r ti � , 7 :.I k.. •1 ''•r F 1, `�'��_ � !-S' � f "nT r+r r si,l','. 4�t fJc. 'F!r. N, i�r't', 1. f•` 1'l I.. l.r:.., t" 't9', ..\5t ,1:1•: `�lx l,a. ••1:,..�.y.I.,x"r, .f.t..:1,,:.:,,..,.r.,Y..•.,.,:.A,•1`IKs,,.,.-.n;r.!I,1:":,::'v :MB(7StAt2. :-u. ..,,...t.><...• _il�r :b- ,, .f /a I- .P`.t..�! .1 , /, �Y r+ '4" a. 13�1"!'r .,Gfd,.. .1_.,r l r , : .."....- __..._. „!,.,,„•.,L...,`r.r,?ir'I�-ltas:nttt C� ,� erirFarrg7�°�c rf•a ar '> `` F 9 r MM4.4- r,. ..,,�ltYt��.f ./ k arflzfi}�. .r,:t�lj.,, ,::: s t r ct r�fT r�: I,,Ytt it, + , �+t l, ,�, •,��'.-r'L'�:;:;;�I: 'I .. , .Lr.r .(1,t 7'1^lh ,`.. �'t .., iL.i� .1� k)i?I'rY.( (;Yt,,>':rl�`,!JY,.....u• ,,,:'f; 3(b) Should paleontological resources (i.e., fossil remains) be Proof of retention of Plan check An paleontologist will be retained and the city will identified at a particular site during project construction, the construction paleontological prior to be notified with work halted should this be foreman shall cease construction within 100 feet of the find until a qualified professional to issuance of encountered and the necessary professional can provide an evaluation. Mitigation of resource impacts shall determine if a demolition requirements/steps met. be implemented and funded by the project applicant and shall be substantial adverse or grading conducted as follows: change would occur to permit, i. Identify and evaluate paleontological resources by intense field survey an paleontological whichever where impacts are considered high resource occurs 2. Assess effects on identified sites earlier 3. Consult with the institutionallacademic paleontologists conducting research investigations within the geological formations that are slated to be impacted 4. Obtain comments from the researchers 5. Comply with researchers'recommendations to address any significant adverse effects where determined by the City to be feasible In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting paleontologist,the City of Huntington Beach staff shall determine whether avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, project design, costs, applicable policies and land use assumptions, and other considerations. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g„ data recovery) shall be instituted, Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources is carried out, .. .. • MM4.5-1 Future development in the Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue Notes on grading plan Plan check Grading plans will incorporate recommendations Corridors Specific Plan area shall prepare a grading plan to contain the and building plans prior to from geotechnical report. recommendations of the final soils and geotechnical report. These issuance of recommendations shall be implemented in the design of the project, a grading including but not limited to measures associated with site preparation, fill permit placement, temporary shoring and permanent dewatering, groundwater seismic design features, excavation stability,foundations, soil stabilization, I establishment of deep foundations,concrete slabs and pavements,surface drainage, cement type and corrosion measures, erosion control, shoring and internal bracing,and plan review. 7 s nc� •.ti:�:Y :...:... F:, MM4,6-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits on any project site, the Preparation of Plan check A preliminary ESA will be performed. site developer(s)shall: technical prior to ■ Investigate the project site to determine whether it or immediately documentation to issuance of adjacent areas have a record of hazardous material contamination via address site-specific demolition the preparation of a preliminary environmental site assessment(ESA), hazards;Risk or grading which shall be submitted to the City for review.If contamination is Management Plan permits, found the report shall characterize the site according to the nature and and whichever Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mifigation Monitoring Checklist 212 9 10 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring 6HAcNbt ( h p +.,;;.1..,.;.,.:.•._,:i.,:.J.s:v:,.:}',J.s:,,s<,..;!;,2;:.r S:•'>S.Y�r,:,.r:1 a:..:i,�,.;•..,il..r.:...1i,.$,'>;.1.,�../-1:/.,:1.•,.,,l.r.,na1:....u.(:..„:-.'',`1)7.„L..,a�-r,..,.,,.:a.s..s.t....,,1e,',n,,;��'t•4;irt:%','.+?-.}I i.,;`.»t,:ri2',�y1t:R1:,r'.;•,"!rt..5,•S.i,-,,i,VV1ss.�:'2'7 5•.,_.;.m:v.,:r,,D a,l��...3.�i7�,,�u.a.I!(.:1..;,i�.,.t.'i:{f1rtPrl�,,.J.�.:.. ...a•),<'c.,,,:�S,,,s',,t.'`,�„.4ta<v':l�..i 1,:.�l.2:7-i it:a'J Z�'�� :t;1,•�1.4�t •(! �. � Y �1r`r`�'•fj%:}1':'iI>�:I,...3 fi 1{{'-r��.�,.tr�1'J7_:.<i;J4S4�3�)::':'J.tf S 1t.•,£.�!r!.,(i,f:.t,7�f't.!"1f.U'!!rv"'(�i�.,s,.t r,k,b,";ry'r..h,.(S�.(�,.<1.yr.t..•k>t„,.k rf1.!,"rr�;.3 i''r.1II�:,,{N.y,><d r:.tits'•f5..a:.1i:.sl,i..:i,.t,..,,.�,a...:L.rhv.:.A•t.}(r�..r.,1:„,t,, :,,lf1>:!:i-:l%rri`,rg,sc,..•.r',•,.r:..I::kr' !1,t',..,-;;•_,,,s�r.S,.••.r-..: Jr,'..,,.:,r;.r•.•.,c L, , .1 .:J.7� r,:n•,. 't 1 ,i..... r, :..fn�•.sp..a •1, .,, s 5 ,. ,..1 _ ,,. .. L. I t .u ,<, d ,. .. 7 l t � � .�..•, ..... ,...:� ... '(. ,.[., ,r. -r.1'k2. ,r1-'a.: •,,.".,..,',::>,� 31. ,.... .< r. f. .. 1 ... r, /..�...,., ,.r n... 7t .S. ,4 I t. ,- I L. Il,: r• J.. 3 i :� i.2•:j!: :';6. r t,� •,.,. �.tt. ,t a, fet7721i�r011 � 1 s. �..P. f�• (: T. �' ,�, ll:'' \., .,:�!..:1.:,•,.• I_,!.1......, •.1 r.,. .. 1 .t',.)� h .. ...:�., 1 f sl.(U .. .1 I.•; i ..,, �� :,r• 1, �.r. ,:.ti•, .a �'7.4.. �, .i. .f, :13 �... � •.# .,. ..,, ,.l n. r,•, L. .a. � ..5 \ .f f :r ! .(.•.1. u. �r� :1'" a. ..1 •i,tcl "� -'d%i: 11 r ,�t �r, .. 31 rta :•:�t, t 1..+.....,,,...s. .,.,15• fl,,l,: ., cr: ( Y,it1• ,w:.,.✓', ,.. vJ't �v':!,. .. ,. ..t -1� r .,s' •i ,tl•v' ,Vua.:(-itia .-L:.'�''iF' �� i :;t}q': ,�S al...,r..z a...,,(1 ,. 2..,. :: .....,a,1�. IN,) ?.r. n���yY„o;,1..�>},c.•j:•�,,, til„f`9, .s:..�1, �11, z:.n y.. t. ;,,,, .)i:. „v, (.0 IC .,h n,1'`>ra ,�a�..5..!� =r,. i,,:lr,t ., I :..,i... Il t...r.•- v.rt..,t.�. • . s,r, rS /. ,j.:!lc25 ..y...,;t,.a„':tr.�. ���Ef>�)OT1, atrrz11f1w s,r1 'ctr,lc,/1 �rlrr,�; t'i� �l,t�;;it+�►e,� �;��{ £,;_'.•,lpJ�f�1'Jt)fd ,S I �.,,i:i,.�,15y<sn., r It: Applicant's grading,building and methane plans shall reference that a sub- permit and Should any measures needed to take place, slab methane barrier and vent system will be installed at the project site during required notes will be added to plans during plan per City Specification No. 429, prior to plan approval: If required by the construction check process. HBFD, additional methane mitigation measures to reduce the level of methane gas to acceptable levels shall be implemented. MM4.6-4 To ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles when Prepare construction Prior to Developer will consult with agencies and prepare construction activities would result in temporary lane or roadway closures, roadway plans approval of necessary plans. the developer shall consult with the City of Huntington Beach Police and grading or Fire Departments to disclose temporary lane or roadway closures and building alternative travel routes, The developer shall be required to keep a permits, minimum of one lane in each direction free from encumbrances at all times whichever on perimeter streets accessing the project site. At any time only a single occurs lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic signal, earlier signal carriers (i.e., fiagpersons), or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment,the developer shall coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach Police and Fire Departments to designate proper detour routes and signage indicating alternative routes. .. i. ,.. ... a .. .... .... . .. .... ... ..: ... _ .. ... ... .� Ur01� .alit ■Y .. .. .. .... ,I, ....,. r. , .r .. ... .. .. .. .. .::.... .r. . d alter call ._ .. ..,.v.:::.. . r.::::•-'-:...:. t .. ...... .... ., .. ,,,. .. .............. .: .r. ..... ..... i ..�;�?"-i ,.:i:ty.;:.:',r,: "^'K i'is:•::s71�:t.. ^f ... .. .. .. _ .. .,. .... .. .... ...,..._:. ity MM4,7-1 City of Huntington Beach shall require Applicants for new Water Quality Prior to WQMP will be prepared and will include DAMP development and significant redevelopment projects within the Specific Management Plan receiving a requirements. WQMP will be submitted to city for Plan area to prepare a project Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)in precise approval during plan check process. accordance with the DAMP requirements and measures described below grading BMP's shall be designed as indicated. and with all current adopted permits. The WQMP shall be prepared by a permit Any dewatering processes requested will be Licensed Civil Engineer and submitted for review and acceptance prior to submitted to the city for approval prior to issuance of a Precise Grading or Building permit, permitting. BMPs in the WQMP shall be designed in accordance with the Municipal NPDES Permit, Model WQMP, DAMP, and City of Huntington Beach LIP, As noted in the Specific Plan, all development projects shall include site design and source control BMPs in the project WQMP. Additionally, new development or significant redevelopment projects and priority projects shall include LID principles to reduce runoff to a level consistent with the maximum extent practicable and treatment control BMPs in the WQMP. If permanent dewatering is required and allowed by the City, CCWD, and other regulatory agencies, the Applicant shall include a description of the dewatering technique, discharge location, discharge quantities, chemical characteristics of discharged water,operations and maintenance plan,and WDID number for proof of coverage under the De Minimus Threat General Permit or copy of the individual WDR in the WQMP. Additionally, the WQMP shall incorporate any additional BMPs as required by the City Public Works Department. The WQMP shall include the following additional requirements: Project and Site Characterization Requirements Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 214 1 l • Entitlement Application numbers and site address shall be included on Numbers/address to be included in WQMP. the title sheet of the WQMP • In the project description section,explain whether proposed use WQMP to include thorough description of project. Includes onsite food preparation,eating areas(if not please state), outdoor activities to be expected,vehicle maintenance,service, washing cleaning(if prohibited onsite,please state) Pollutants to be identified on WQMP. • All potential pollutants of concern for the proposed project land use type as per Table 7.11-1 of the Orange County Model Water Quality Management Plan shall be identified Narrative to be included to address pollutant • A narrative describing how all potential pollutants of concern will be treating through BMP's. addressed through the implementation of BMPs and describing how site design BMP concepts will be considered and incorporated into the project design shall be included • Existing soil types and estimated percentages of perviousness for Soil types to be identitfied. existing and proposed conditions shall be identified • In Section I of the WQMP,state verbatim the Development Development requirements to be included. Requirements from the Planning Department's letter to the Applicant • A site plan showing the location of the selected treatment control Plan to be added to WQMP. BMPs and drainage areas shall be included in the WQMP • A Geotechnical Report shall be submitted to address site conditions for Geotechnical report will be submitted. determination of infiltration limitations and other pertinent characteristics. Project-Based Treatment Control BMPs 0 Infiltration-type BMPs shall not be used unless the Geotechnical Treatment control will be based on project type Report states otherwise.Depth to seasonal high groundwater is and guidelines in Geotechnical report. determined to provide at least a 10-foot clearance between the bottom of the IBMP and top of the water table. It is expected that infiltration BMPs may be feasible between Holland Drive and Utica Drive, however,a Geotechnical Investigation must be conducted to ensure sufficient properties • Wet swales and grassed channels shall not be used because of the Wet swales/grassed channels shall not be used. slow infiltration rates of project site soils,the potentially shallow depth to groundwater,and water conservation needs • If proprietary Structural Treatment Control devices are used,they shall Treatment control will abide by manufacturer's be sited and designed in compliance with the manufacturers design criteria. criteria • Surface exposed treatment control BMPs shall be selected such that Understood. BMP's to be designed accordingly. standing water drains or evaporates within 24 hours or as required by the County's vector control • Excess stormwater runoff shall bypass the treatment control BMPs Understood. BMP's will be designed accordingly. unless they are designed to handle the flow rate or volume from a 100- year storm event without reducing effectiveness. Effectiveness of any treatment control 13MP for removing the pollutants of concern shall be 12 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring($18cklist !.: { .-r.. ,.1.r';. lh.. e• F. •rv: �s+' „n::r. .,,x:vl t ..x.,. ,a, rJ a i;: ,h•tr r rs',r.. •,4 yy f 1�+ a t. p, ,•, _d r, +-• t i:�, t r,.. � ,f.P, s. ,,; 1...,,, ;;�::.,; ,; .r;.i rsF.:::,;.. I,I. ,J � I � .,,• ,.i •t' r., f S e ,.J. :t prr.y,..L,s •c �, f ,::1' ,y' i ) 4 c ,� cY .,1 �1T.:'<,.: Ira<;J J :,f.,:f, .1. 1. a t• •,) 1. ,� ,r / P :t-- t�, l r. ..! ,.),• `.IS J" I I.I s r rI'--.1.., v: L_,•!..'� b, ..�. ,)< Yl.' n 11 it• .1. .1 r ,t r I .c. r. r :.>,r i. !Ja t, •J•'. 4 f i � :� , <r.,_LrY f r '-�, .n.. },. :s.) .l).1 .:,s i .t r r � % {. sL.,' 1;r 1. •..r,. .1 . vs4r:a•,,.,r,•:...<,.:;,.,;!:;;;; 1. t.�,(,-.., j t :..... ....,• ..r,:_._t ,: ,.. . . ,, { ,,.(:.f t 1111 ( b t r, ,,;. :? .. , ." � a (''., ts.r,: =.11 :;I+;'+u;'J .G b.. ./,., !r r.'('11,4 :Fl u:i'i v.1 L •:5,.. ,�'2 ,ij. ,:l „1:<,r,(:, ..3•`h.,,, ! �, ��y'p r 1• .i.. , t. „n.,F,,.1..+.•^-:'. { •.)r y, tt Y J t /v t a•f il t Y�`7 � :, I: fFT @ � U• 1 k 111 , ..l �y '>rl• l,S,'• .S, „a �n} ,� I , i r'- d . k ., r r- •':.r. 'dih :{,; ,,.. C ;l ,3:'. o <! ( �.r r �:.. ,rk � .ta. � _) �, .,4 F f >•,, '1 �-� .+,5. i {{ ,.: k }� i. ,l; � � 1,�, � i 3 .:'i{ .:r. r u1 � ,.:, ) r 4�,r: ,t., p ( s• 3 ,1'� V.c:t. 3 1 .ri,.. .:rh': rr'r l' '.1 t <t'- f� l: a! !, f..ii:��l":: S l -1* s,l �cif.+, 7, .l s`1�.. .7�,>1• :$:`o- L• �<J r .:r, nl: } .t. 1 •,r� ( .1 �'7 'I ) �', �+1.,J fJi f t 1..r -., r 1'f:,.r ,i.; j� .f `� ,I v .�.1.. .13' ru { ,)'i, �' •s, .,,t, ,.t-..„LJ� ��.r r o.: .I ., e� ,J. p:,,}'i,,. .§`r? -s .f Sf ,.e .u. .t1..,�C�1C .:f,�� .+f Y.�„h:�:�,,',tvp..::•., :r f� ,.h I f��,. J> r!, 1, ? , L7c<,yy, , I3o�fJYf1'��}. :1.,`` .�.., ` 1 t`�' ,.� „s} 1' ��;„ ,.t � .) � 1i7 'f� >t+�.- f c,;.� _} t t •t,,.,,:1 4,' n '('d•c,f <. ) ' +,.. •,,+- ... ..:k..-,�r.' ,. Sd.l., ; U?;y, ' .. , I ., \<f ..;;.4SiFL i. ,sf. 4FpS}fiiti'S„„�'7Jdl{ .i:.3 ,sfi}.i;il.r..1r'r) documented via analytical models or existing studies on effectiveness. ■ The project WQMP shall incorporate water efficient landscaping using WOMP to comply with measure. drought tolerant,native plants in accordance with Landscape and Irrigafion Plans as set forth by the Association(see below) ■ Pet waste stations(stations that provide waste pick-up bags and a convenient disposal container protected from precipitation)shall be Pet waste stations will be added to plans. provided and maintained ■ Building materials shall minimize exposure of bare metals to stormwater.Copper or Zinc roofing materials, including downspouts, shall be prohibited.Bare metal surfaces shall be painted with non-lead- Plans will reflect this measure. containing paint The following BMPs shall not be used because they have not been shown Undersood- BMP's will not use any such devices. to be effective in many situations. Therefore, unless sufficient objective studies and review are available and supplied with the WQMP to correctly size devices and to document expected pollutant removal rates the WQMP shall not include: ■ Hydrodynamic separator type devices as a BMP for removing any pollutant except trash and gross particulates ■ Oil and Grit separators • Any Applicant proposing development in the Specific Plan Area is encouraged to consider the following BMPs: ■ Sand filters or other filters(including media filters)for rooftop runoff ■ Dry swales.A dry swale treatment system could be used if sufficient area,slope gradient,and length of swale could be incorporated into the project design, Dry$wales could remove substantial amounts of nutrients,suspended solids,metals,and petroleum hydrocarbons ■ Other proprietary treatment devices(if supporting documentation is provided) Non-Structural BMPs � J The WQMP shall include the following operations and maintenance BMPs I WQMP to include operations and maintenance under the management of a Homeowners/Business Association BMP's as indicated in measure. (Association),where applicable.The Association shall fund and implement an operational and maintenance program that includes the following: ■ The Association shall dictate minimum landscape maintenance standards and tree trimming requirements for the total project site. Landscape maintenance shall be performed by a qualified landscape maintenance company or individual in accordance with a Chemical Management Plan detailing chemical application methods,chemical handling procedures,and worker training.Pesticide application shall be performed by a certified applicator.No chemicals shall be stored on-site unless in a covered and contained area and in accordance with an approved Materials Management Plan.Application rates shall not exceed labeled rates for pesticides,and shall not exceed soil test rates j Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 216 13 for nutrients.Slow release fertilizers shall be used to prevent excessive nutrients in stormwater or irrigation runoff. • The Association shall have the power and duty to establish, oversee, guide,and require proper maintenance and tree trimming procedures Understood. Landlord to work with Association to per the ANSI A-300 Standards as established by the International abide by their requirements. Society of Arborist.The Association shall require that all trees be trimmed by or under the direct observation/direction of a licensed/certified Arborlst for the entire area. The Association shall establish minimum standards for maintenance for the total community, and establish enforcement thereof for the total community,The Association shall rectify problems arising from incorrect tree trimming, chemical applications,and other maintenance within the total community. • Landscape irrigation shall be performed in accordance with an Irrigation Management Plan to minimize excess irrigation contributing to dry-and wet-weather runoff,Automated sprinklers shall be used and Agreed. be inspected at least quarterly and adjusted yearly to minimize potential excess irrigation flows.Landscape irrigation maintenance shall be performed in accordance with the approved irrigation plans, the City Water Ordinance and per the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications, • Proprietary stormwater treatment systems maintenance shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. If a nonproprietary treatment system is used,maintenance shall be in Stormwater system to abide by this measure. accordance with standard practices as identified in the current CASQA (2003)handbooks,operations and maintenance procedures outlined in the approved WOMP,City BMP guidelines,or other City-accepted guidance. • Signage,enforcement of pet waste controls, and public education Understood. Landlord to work with Association to would improve use and compliance,and therefore,effectiveness of the insure conformance. program, and reduce the potential for hazardous materials and other pollution in stormwater runoff.The Association shall prepare and install appropriate signage,disseminate information to residents and retail businesses,and include pet waste controls(e.g.,requirements for pet waste clean up,pet activity area restrictions,pet waste disposal i restrictions)in the Association agreement/Conditions,Covenants,and Restrictions. • Street sweeping shall be performed at an adequate frequency to Landlord to schedule regular street sweeping prevent build up of pollutants(see maintenance. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ultraurb/for street sweeping effectiveness), • The Association shall develop a maintenance plan for BMPs and facilities identifying responsible parties and maintenance schedules Understood, and appropriate BMPs to minimize discharges of contaminants to storm drain systems during maintenance operations. 14 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring (.?�, cklist .�.!. .,. .I.•I �.,. e...;._.. .1 f.. ...,..., v.a,:,.. n;,;,ras.rr,i. :, .•.,, N., .:.,..s,. h i .., i .. .L 1.. I .. ,A... •, )7, l >1 .,r •,�,.,..r:,,,.,..:..nil;:eaf.,.,, r„•,..,,,„ .1 -vC• :,,, s.r, I r �J .5,t ,.. .�•. :•:t I -Lt, :,•'. ,n: ,? t -'f'.'. ?F n'� J <. .Tf .as •.S '! .ry' 'ti''•`ir. ':S:ici�aiir.„ .t.,xlt. .I,..Ir', .r{l,., '.t .'h„ .t°� '£ .IF..^! , ff ll .>7. C .y' q :if: tt 311: 'tl I �, .a:•I.✓'', a'af..:.,, r•1� .5.. ..f• ..:C{'i-� 1 £ f /.i rl Ji}+1 :.�. �� }�. I. l .-\ ft...<.r ri,;.,,• a. t`.• ,L,. •:31,s 1.: r, s ,�;n�- r. I{ ,c+ •!_ ,5. ':n t I� 's. '�`•�S •a-. f t1 'Yi•,s:. �`'''r''- 1� r ld a 1 f, to ,e l.. t. :�a�S;;,,, .-1.,.:„ :3 t „n, � f2 � i,rt � � n ,1,1. u, .., t. •tl 1r J,�2 t `•r< :P`:• .�b .,r�..A'• �, ,.f.';:4., ,iY l�� 3 ,i s ,vF i a•l: ��z= { .{. f„ .1 , n h. 1,5�, ,JJ ,1 1`?M. T F r R. r.t .:l,. ,i. ?;;i"'rr 1 ,.c,, ::Fr� 1 •:,.1 tlb. r .,F. JJ ,, ,.. ..1 �r f hi 7 �'_� 9°� ! e. r. ,• d h.. ,i. t, 1 F�- L. ,... �¢ t 1 �• ] V'. { s r.F,. t l,�rJ.Tk.I-,<.r,:. ,•., ,C l'• :1. ,i^)!' t P'. f ,� ,d ,l" F'3 2 t• m t. .`i. , ,� x r�•, .,,, !, ,1 �.r: , t ,• .L tr. ..1, I� 1. .Y .r• > �1}l.. . ,.`L..- 1�:r •.1 3•. I , �. eonqq� a„, F .,�, t yr,»,. ,{a r f';`�>,r :> �i': .t .,Yi .£ Jt 1 � 1-..' � ., r/ i i1 �•r, „n• u 1' ,.,tx< x "i 4.y �. ,,. ! � �,r• ,S i!W' S J �1?- r .r. �{ )y '!. 7- / ^). tit. t � :]> .J ., r.= trd,..i .�•.c ,i.r I.� � � �• f. ,} .� ,�' � S � ro: it i t>•'r.., ,1 .. .. t t .,3.< 1. ,.,, ,. J• c.. _. �. i.r 7 r Irl, r.l,r, „r ,�r. «If v 1:�..'4n 1. �t 't%.: ' .v.,,� .i. ,, ,. i JMI� ;�, :,,, ,.I:h ;•sc x 1. ., rt s_. r .r� '{.ti he c,rrr, l .,3, .k,....,.:,f , IP,157..l,1.., ., !15.Iw�.,- <i �. 1.{{�J�J�..1 5 tsi ,. .r .. ,. ..L. r dilt�13�6 '•ar:1�:. I.{.' ,r, f..( -1- � )...<. '!1 .3,, .j:. ,�t...Fia+:1 >l F/,r t,y).^;.lsl ,r J:r:>:. 1!, 1:t7,.A,r./J7��(t�'4J:,)f�.i. r.,,,l. Umnit:;.•IS Y:;fl�Y1 1 } �(,;?,-,f;ituj tJfA4r i� }'�;��;. '(4 '�a'f2;' ,. !-t1:3 f, '1•. :,J-i 1•il f,V�'s.r ttCt,l.:�:t. .i ,.•::f: ..t�t$r,Vi r'..aT,•r.`'tlf::'i:;:.rt�,.'.C•�1'I:,.>.rl:ili;i:F1(ir<�':3"..r.l;fi,. ■ Reporting requirements:the Association shall prepare an annual report Landlord will abide with this measure. and submit the annual report to the City of Huntington Beach documenting the BMPs operations and maintenance conducted that year.The annual report shall also address the potential system deficiencies and corrective actions taken or planned. Site Design BMPs Any Applicant proposing development in the Specific Plan Area is required to incorporate LID principles as defined in the Municipal NPDES Permit LID principles will be implemented. and is encouraged to consider the following BMPs, if allowed in accordance with the Geotechnical Report and limitations on infiltration BMPs: ■ Use of porous concrete or asphalt(if acceptable to the Geotechnical Engineer and where infiltration will not adversely affect groundwater) or other pervious pavement for driveways,paths,sidewalks,and courtyards/open space areas,to the maximum extent practicable, would reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff as well as provide some detention within the material void}space,If porous paver blocks are used,they shall be adequately maintained to provide continued porosity(effectiveness) ■ Incorporation of rain gardens or cisterns to reuse runoff for landscape irrigation ■ Green roofs to reduce runoff and treat roof pollutants Site design and landscape planning to group water use requirements for efficient irrigation MM4.7-2 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that any Applicant Groundwater Prior to Study will be prepared, incorporated and prepare a Groundwater hydrology Study to determine the lateral Hydrology Study issuance of approved by the city, transmissivity of area soils and a safe pumping yield such that dewatering a precise activities do not interfere with nearby water supplies. The Groundwater grading Hydrology Study shall make recommendations on whether permanent permit groundwater dewatering is feasible within the constraints of a safe pumping level. The Applicant's engineer of record shall incorporate the Hydrology Study designs and recommendations into project plans. If safe groundwater dewatering is determined to not be feasible, permanent groundwater dewatering shall not be implemented. The City Director of Public Works, OCWD, and other regulatory agencies shall approve or disapprove any permanent groundwater dewatering based on the Groundwater Hydrology Study and qualified Engineers'recommendations. f Void space is the empty space between individual particles. Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 218 15 -. ':... .. .. .. : , Y r .1 .• .. , ..,♦„r , `Jt..:....,:,:. >.........if:rf.:::. .' I. ., ..N" �'\'tit-(= 41)! -.,.. .. ::: ,. Ps: ....., .. .. ..r ., .J. u .:. !. ,. ,. ,. ,-a .. ... .,J. .. .(... •:x: :h. '.= ..,.?,_, .:.,::,... : , c. :. 1 .: ,._. ,r •. ., <<.. •r,, r ...:,1.,. T. .,.1 ...:.,...`.i.f 7 : _ ry.,.{> <.,1..7. '_ ...,. .,,, _....L.t.., I ::e; ,..,. ,::.....I . ., ,..,.a ,r,r,.,,.. v Y., r. ,.\n t H •:F. ... , ... :..,.. .... ,.. ....... .. 'i::,. .: .. ...:).J(�/ � 1.„) - r,l..., ...y'�!. .�.. '.{.. .�, .!•,,:1, �}�]}� '+�"i:;'. (;,. __.:., _.,... s � .,.,. .,.e o,. .. �S..y 1 „, .:., .. t... .... .... ..r. ..F h yy .t. ".tt•.,.. sl:i ,a.7 ).i ;::':ck%. ;:- _. ,. .. ,.. ,..<.,. ;... ,, ,_ .,...... , ,�,... .,,.....e„ ,�r ...,., A. ... `s ,rti.. „12 :'lur• ::�' ti.?�c.,. i- ,.. .,.,, ,yy .. r .♦....,,.......�' "':L:. ;. �,"iSi:r;, :S�: ;i'r•1,f''.',�.,. v MM4.7.3 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that the Applicant's Hydrology and Prior to Study will be prepared, incorporated and Licensed Civil Engineer for each site-specific development prepare a Hydraulics Study issuance of approved by the city. Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to identify the effects of potential a precise stormwater runoff from the specific development on the existing storm grading drain flows for the 1D-, 25-, and 100-year design storm events. The and Precise street final grading permit Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall identify existing runoff and proposed and improvement plans Following runoff, in addition to existing storm drain system capacity at the and studies grading, development site discharge location to the nearest down-gradient main excavation, junction. The Applicant shall design site drainage and document that the and proposed development would not increase peak storm event Flows over installation existing conditions for the design storm events.The final site plan shall not of utilities exceed an impervious fraction of 0.9, unless sufficient retention is incorporated into the site design to accommodate excess runoff. The Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall also incorporate all current adopted Municipal NPDES Permit requirements for stormwater flow calculations and retention/detention features in effect at the time of review. MM4.7-4 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that adequate Hydrology and Prior to Capacity will be determined and design/steps capacity in the storm drain system is demonstrated from the specific Hydraulics Study issuance of taken to insure compliance with measure. development site discharge location to the nearest main channel to a precise accommodate discharges from the specific development, If capacity is grading demonstrated as adequate,no upgrades will be required. If capacity is not permit adequate, the City of Huntington Beach shall identify corrective action(s) required by the specific development Applicant to ensure adequate capacity.Corrective action could include,but is not limited to: ■ Construction of new storm drains,as identified in the MPD or based on the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study, if the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study identifies greater impacts than the MPD ■ Improvement of existing storm drains,as identified in the MPD or based on the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study,if the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study identifies greater impacts than the MPD ■ In-lieu fees to implement system-wide storm drain infrastructure improvements ■ Other mechanisms as determined by the City Department of Public Works. ■ For nonresidential areas,if redevelopment would result in an impervious fraction of less than 0.9 and does not increase the directly connected impervious area compared to existing conditions,runoff is expected to remain the same or less than as assessed in the MPD and ' only MPD improvements would be required. Because some storm drain system constraints may be located far downgradient from the actual development site, several properties may serve to contribute to system capacity constraints. Therefore, the City Department of Public Works shall assess each site development and system characteristics to identify the best method for achieving adequate 16 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring&e,cklist .k r t . ., r .Ir ,. r 1 ., I , f ,. '! ..,..Y. ,..,.. ...,.r._t r, .,:1:. .'u•r .p:e.: : ', .,. .a ... . 1 c .I, ..I ., .7 I} :. ( ... >".rd a ..t a,:;,. •: ..,-r.,r+ ..a. ,. , .:,r. ::, t e a s �7 t .,5., if- .f !, .a<. i 1 1 -1 ! �'I•••,. , v . � 1 ) . If It r,. I . I„ .rr r.. -..... �, ... > ,, ) ,f i:....... .,. Y^ 1' ::,f:;: „t,l.r) Y h 5. ,I ). ,f. 1 6d• zrt,S 3 , r.!. ,1 r 1, ( { >•r ..i. I r., ,tlt,. ! ,, tf" !. >' ,�"�r• !r , ,t, 41.. tZ ,. I s: rr t'< { E.J. �' , .a� +.I.. .:r .�.!- a ,,,. •,„ry: 4::.,1,,- rt. •d, }, ,l „1s •.{ t F •� ci) ,.}r- , .,.. L.`. 'r r.• ). b ,, 1 '4, r 'rD,.-•s.. a I.f.. t 'MIN I, ( ,,. „f' J ,!? I. 1, a t � r • 1 ,.'. J•n:� ). • .I.,( 'J t t,r� ,d,• j d r 'i' , ,,1" ``r�(v•. y ':ale .)�' 7 # i, � �' S,.f, S ,fiS .,v •�+: , ,, ,� 7. I f n � .I.G• P' I 8i u •;t• ,+•tl.? .1 ;L' �r• Y f' 1 .J I: •AI t. .I•-. r.*r `r'',f -S .f r�tit. :•r:..r, i< tt r .1 ) I SJI'A r.t .;P `. �, :r�,• 7 ffr:7` ! r, it Jf:r., r�•��� :�: .Js:'••,;�x, fr Vs , f t. , ,� .i• v .IU= ttd S. ., '![.�x• �.: l•' � ?1 � ! r.r r .,, 3 l t ..r „. try:. .1. �! la, c• i .�.;. l. }r/ � r. �� s�, .�. .�: h� It� .,9... � , .,,r.. •,; r;4f��•,;n>Is .s �: � i,l".,{., s rl t•.t _�,. �t,tr, �• , 4 LI tt 1 � } : ?i;.f ,�:: r >. 1{1., 1 r 1?.. ,. .,' �: ..,1,C I .f�c r M .t xcst;t ,,'r•,:i• 1 11=r3:r••:rt'dk' J' ,\ '.i .11 f•. I' ,1 {!l t, rt ,'1'•i'I 1 1 'f YS'. .f.t 7.• „ter :� >•! l.F'r'�2 ti �•^.q,), ,! tb. .{,>rx , :1, a,. .,l:,l..,,ar'la:.I „v,..,... r.,,.7V1 ���'_5a ���. ..., .Ir.�.. ,:,a:, . .!.,...4'S ,. ._. ;ff , .3s.f.. ., ,trrd.::j,�1.:).Si)rs„ri !•,�„7.11{4X',•in,,,I� !td I,At� '.lair.:,:?;;.r,.r{rSu san4..,r..,.,, _t t,:. capacity in the storm drain system, Drainage assessment fees/districts to improve/implement storm drains at downstream locations or where Study will be prepared, incorporated and contributing areas are large are enforced through Municipal Code approved by the city. (Section 14.20), The City Department of Public Works shall review the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study and determine required corrective action(s) or if a waiver of corrective action is applicable. The site-specific development Applicant shall incorporate required corrective actions into their project design and/or plan. Prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection, the City Department of Public Works shall ensure that required corrective action has been implemented. MM4.9-1 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that the Contract language Plan check BMP's will be listed on:plans to comply with following construction best management practices(BMPs)be implemented and notes on grading prior to measure. by contractors to reduce construction noise levels: and building plans issuance of ■ Two weeks prior to the commencement of construction,notification a grading must be provided to surrounding land uses within 300 feet of a project permit site disclosing the construction schedule,including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the construction period ■ Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to industry standards and be in good working condition ■ Place noise-generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses,where feasible ■ Schedule high noise-producing activities between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 5:00 P.M.to minimize disruption on sensitive uses, Monday through Saturday.Schedule pile-driving activities between the hours of 8:00 A.M.and 4:00 P.M.on Mondays through Fridays only. ■ Implement noise attenuation measures,which may include,but are not limited to,temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources • Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment,where feasible ■ Construction-related equipment,including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles,and portable equipment,shall be turned off when not in use for more than 10 minutes ■ Construction hours,allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent.If the City or the job superintendent receives a complaint,the superintendent shall investigate,take appropriate corrective action,and report the action taken to the reporting party. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed pr ' t Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 220 17 . _. :>(.P-:��"'>::\'^.'S �f ::n:r, s.l'? ,i;?1�:r'. ,1- v-� } 2 t � 5. ,fiN,,..f•,.,�...3;r.q. w'r• f .il !�,' ! s,.;<4>;.tf.,j,•.is",; •{i:,. ,.;Y.'" r5:.. -._ :r...-:,..., ll _ _-�l:•i�iv 'ifvCi.^� -k. ..,:..•J.. ,:.i'... :hY,Y •;P;r y».Jf,..,. %it'i!;,t"'i`i::..<.1:.., � ...,.i •, +.'... f:; .:<f:i.,::.�!;; 1,r,tt' �::::.:..... .I..-YG:.. ,, 'a.. :: , ::: . ;5„., .: .{. •;;;`ri 't ,yl:.'tF:lii: u... N";:;i'3 ,':i...ta `r,,:,..n.,.: : .,.1:h.,.,t ".t.: ::;6t..:..-. .,,., :,,'. 1:. -,,., t ! t �n'1 � �rr�n .>...,� :.;,,.,Fn•...� ! %r: �\e. .CAS .,i:i .i., nth �.._..,: ..;;,: ':a' ... .. � a.::[` .h. rf'., r. !�!t�/'.:, nf.•'•ae. :,'�::. :;L.; 1.1.,.�! . t. <'..;. �,.✓Y5«,.a .:..,: n,s.. ..c 11.. ... ....t.,.. , _t An.,.pi;' ,i ,!d. ..i. '-:o-n;.•`� .. .i... ...:.. ... .,.. ,' I. ( ...r ,Y. .... 1r... .! ., '.a ,. �5 ! ,..., ,. ...� 15 1•.�.I. 1. :•T11�!' .i., t,.t; 1 �!:':. v a:7nY•• :,7!{, •5.., d. .,. �m%, ,,.q,i„n,.,4�{u.. ,•;I. .r ta't`11 .,�� >,:i:, r. , .I i•., 1 ... ;.. ... •\ 5 f,is :: , •.1, S`l 55 <,.}.: �, :,,..,..{f.,l.•.'� G.a. ,:r, ) Y.',,.1.f::i... :1. :\....ll..\,, q ..;,.,: i,. .,.,.1qq,. -i:. .:....... ..'....•...• ..t•., ..a .t. :..,, ,. ... .: ., .'-, .,..Y. <. 51r a'.}.d�F. rj .t.. .t.' •ve'!2'1'Y!!. 2iIt7Z. .l. •.:AP. ........ ......,z }t •r... ,...-.,,ii .,. ., r. ,t, ,t... ;>`., ,. 11LL, {..may .: :� ,....),lf'� :..,, a4. i.,. .�... G•el ?i; .r:. v..�.r:,:r,•i:.:.::•• ,u:Gikt ,::_ ....:... I 1l1 ... i.,U,,..k z !. :i';u; •}..,:�., _,.y._ :;or:t:'. ... ....... .. �'1r1 r,�.�l.el,,,.e:.:._C•,e,: construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM4.9-2 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Prior to Plans will indicate staging areas in compliance construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving and notes on grading issuance of with this measure. equipment within the project area would be located as far away from plans a grading vibration and noise sensitive sites as possible,Contract specifications shall permit be included in the proposed project construction documents,which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM4.9-3 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Prior to Notes will be added to plans to reflect heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away from and notes on building issuance of compliance with this measure. residential streets. Contract specifications shall be included in the plans a building proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the permit City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM4.9.4 Project applicants shall provide proper shielding for all new Contract language Prior to Project to be designed to comply with this HVAC systems used by the proposed residential and mixed use buildings and notes on grading issuance of measure. to achieve a noise attenuation of 15 dBA at 50 feet from the equipment. plans a grading permit MM4.9-5 Prior to issuance of building permits, project applicants shall Acoustical Study Prior to An acoustical study has been prepared and submit an acoustical study for each development, prepared by a certified issuance of submitted to the city. acoustical engineer.Should the results of the acoustical study indicate that building that exterior (e.g., patios and balconies) and interior noise levels would I permits exceed the standards set forth in the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Sections 8.40.M through 8.40.070, the project applicant shall include design measures that may include acoustical paneling or walls to ensure that noise levels do not exceed City standards.Final project design shall incorporate special design measures in the construction of the residential units,if necessary. ,.... :, , .x 1. ..f.........,................ .................-. .......... ....... ..... .... .. .. .. ...,,.. ... .,.......... .,i.. ..,t: •.i*::,. :•:fir,: 1ii.:� •,a:.i ..4:;::"r•:`. MM4.11.1 Subject to the City's annual budgetary process,which considers Budget sufficiently to Prior to Understood. available funding and the staffing levels needed to provide acceptable maintain standard issuance of response time for fire and police services, the City shall provide sufficient level of fire and police building funding to maintain the City's standard, average level of service through protection permits the use of General Fund monies. r� rt rtM MM4.13-1 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area, the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of separate westbound right turn lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard certificate of at Warner Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans approval. 18 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring CRecklist .`�.a <a S.. ,! . .. b, r r 1 I tS' ,, Jr .r ..c , k .f ( ,.r , , t ,., t f .1 !. ,E1� -... Y- �: ry f 5. T ,:..:. 1 1 t , ,fin c 'E,- ,, ff i, t i. ,� s, ':Jw �1 .,1, t, .1 r7.. ,! , - ' r., 1 rVl q I 3 1. if t. 'i. ,r- J=a :r 1 , C k. b �' , S ,k r, j �1 r� S p 4.,r Ntl'2 t r/ tt ` {•� r f � j} �; :f' , i ..6 tt d i 1• 4 i..<' t, �Ir 1.,,�4• 1tU�3 { �.is 1, { f {. r .i E' .fir f1 ,i(i..� f � ,.•1)L, }.,r,•,t ,� .� ,, s Rt:, .� III. ,) k• r ,J. .'1,..4 Era ';S• ,i}f..li,)f. '!.. o n,1 'r .,s 1:, *,i -I, I '^I., ...r•- ,j .: J 5 1 '.1• C' ,� r-.,t ..,ti- I.. f a`n'i s11'=. / 1 'i,. ...n•:'.• '.:rrj .,Ij i 3,.;1. i' .,,1„ ('•t1 f� r. I F. .,1.. - tY�. •'rt ..,rr,' ^, �#''. ,i t r:T.� .,�. � r, `. •I t '�. �-I, ,; .t i,; I r; , ,. I��'i l 1, I� r: �5f�0 , .S rJ r :�� "E•; .,1, .i.,,ra >.�:f> {{l�r. 1;.1 .f/, ). ( � � e ._ 4 >t t rE! cr.1 .+�, R I r � �. ,�� rr �.J J 'rt.S9�'' t, ,r , 'f�..;�'., .`r. !`. '11 ,F. v,. .R u.f :rgp+ •� !I ).• i 7.` l- ,.. ,. ;jr ! ,�.I.'si�•,,. r7 S usJ:.,.'u'i',,,i Y}..•/..k; .; ;l.l 4dfi:ft. {S i.l •t .l ,s ���•„ ,o, f .I, ,. Pa :,t .no 17}.:r., ,,.' ..; 13nay. .., .r}Y Il :_,, ,_,,,I ,,: "rl,,�I.e;;f, .! '.+.,. �lt Si, : I l {.;iS't r .,i• MM4.13-2 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Priorto Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of payment issuance of dual northbound and southbound left tum lanes to the intersection of certificate of Beach Boulevard at Garfield Avenue. Implementation of this improvement occupancy I would require Caltrans approval. MM4.13-3 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of fourth northbound through lane to the intersection of Brookhurst Street at certificate of Adams Avenue. occupancy MM4.13-4 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to T Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of separate northbound right turn lane to the intersection of Brookhurst Street certificate of at Adams Avenue: occupancy MM4.13-5 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area, the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of fourth southbound through lane to the intersection of Brookhurst Street at certificate of Adams Avenue, _ occupancy MM4.13.6 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure.M project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of fourth eastbound through lane to the intersection of Brookhurst Street at certificate of Adams Avenue. occupancy MM4.13-7 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area, the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of fourth westbound through lane to the intersection of Brookhurst Street at certificate of Adams Avenue. occupancy MM4.13-8 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area, the Proof of fair share Priorto Landlord will abide by this.measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution to allow a right turn payment issuance of overlap for a westbound right turn at the intersection of Brookhurst Street certificate of at Adams Avenue. occupancy MM4.13-9 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure, project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution to allow a right turn payment issuance of overlap for a northbound right turn at the intersection of Brookhurst Street certificate of at Adams Avenue. _ occupancy MM4.13-10 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of fourth northbound through lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard at certificate of Edinger Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans approval. Beach and Edinger Comdors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 222 19 Smo*N'. I ....... ...... MM4.13-11 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of third westbound through lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard at certificate of Edinger Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans approval. MM4.13-12 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of separate southbound right turn lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard certificate of at Bolsa Avenue, Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans and City of Westminster approvals, MM4.13-13 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of second westbound left turn lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard at certificate of Talbert Avenue, Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans approval. MM4.13-14 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment Issuance of de facto westbound right turn lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard certificate of at Talbert Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans approval. MM4.13-15 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the conversion payment Issuance of of a separate westbound right turn lane to a de facto right turn lane at the certificate of Intersection of Newland Street at Warner Avenue. occupancy MM4.13-16 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure. project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of third westbound through lane to the intersection of Newland Street at certificate of Warner Avenue. occupancy MM4.13-17 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure, project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of separate southbound right turn lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard certificate of at McFadden Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans and City of Westminster approvals. MM4.13-18 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan area,the Proof of fair share Prior to Landlord will abide by this measure, project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution for the addition of a payment issuance of separate northbound right turn lane to the intersection of Beach Boulevard certificate of at McFadden Avenue, Implementation of this improvement would require occupancy Caltrans and City of Westminster approvals. 20 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring&ecklist illy,:;ui�:(ya`biGY:)f :r/L),%!i•;l!r6a,"1�N�•y"'°'S tq... ..'.n! �.P� i5 :::c.i' y1>`.'Y"f•T>,:.nr ` I ♦ ! t i 1. � , 1 � .) 1 3 , 1• er.•••,'t•rr•':='^Ir.•_• ..� d �{ a' .!✓ '.51,- a 'l' ti .r=7 +�>, 1 .l'• 3, � ''I i. R.r j•., Il t. S �11 r .� i 'u<• )fir�I g y tt� "Y; ai.. � ':e,; , F�. J�•T �G ( •,,7' t.a 1 � d ."',b. ,.',!5 -.3r ,y` Y'. 1 , r'l :t ,1+ yy ,<r.,. lil I l , :f,S^': ,/.r s:•.,,�ei�r• .Yr !U+'l:t�•��I'! fi.. `.,Sri (� it+ r. '�.�(fn"i''@ ,3 �k i. t 1.. l ♦1� �/ '�, t �' L`rk ,#: r4 ?�>},. r sr,1. .a t ^� .i .� '�'i. .s". L$`.l` .t• Y r?�; A+ ..�". p ( a,r��•,`';is"' I ?� :? �. '� ! � I 6'f ,.,-���,, 7 :r.r•?;✓r.f,.r,.,,.r� .r). ,.� it 1 �' f;{"rY, �j::n.E'� I ,;rsh�il l s. 1 c.. �:� AY�4 �rn � rtsr ',r;' , t t� 1' rt{„4.,'t.,t �i.:�wr. 4 :;;C�.: ; �7 �! 3 ,t }.? }� ��: 'y;t� ',r:•:i.6,t _ /�I( ,1,1 1� )...,'7ir�t. ,r f Y.r .'kF'i ,.,11,., „'� R/ ii ,SI, f s'/Y,��'YIf P, /.♦t. /, i:� �t ��4 2� .1 � t, r �r1 J. lai7, 7 r .� �-,� f '� _ r,�..: �. y,l)3'�. �r�•'r: 4d.rf f1'a 1•� v,., la z, { ;C�L1 31?,r i'• 1 tt (. ,a,:f J; ,IL 11 1 7%,1: .n.....t •:� , J 1�,.t � "'l, �.� .1., .\l,r� ,�!. $.- 1a �7�?l :,d � �, �,�' d t' '�r, :.> _ >;� y .� d j' � 2 '�•, i' c(1: ''..a ? �.. -:,,?- �.(1 ,�� � `t �, Ywt7 Y,,�;��73,, ••ul'{t�} d}7i�','I i,� 'i1� :'t,r rL1 ,�.,,:�.�1 ^,rl,!,'Jir;c'l nrr r {{ tI y U:;xrr,N.: �::..:... .......::....:. ..... :. .:.... tt t �{ � >1 [1 a p, k4;q � ry. ^i•��1 t.1„. ):I:�;:..t ..... .. ....{... ., ..... .. ,i .,. ....:,..... ,....r::, ,u. nw ..., ,.. r:>. .,r-,,,1•,.:.,.;.,:,,,,. �i,LliO..1,) '�">�,��, ..I4!??.>1 av,p:. .. ...0 f..r. .. ..,.i:.11..1 ... ..... .. ,?. „ ... ?!1.,• ..... ., :rW iu7:::�:Y.'v.tf4. f r 1 r 4 r 1,. rl• !I .... ..... a Y::'•.•..r.. ..� I .:...:.:.:.::::::;.:;':,,.:.:::t"r':�':•..:•,,..:�............ f r r I. d .. .. .. .. ,. � I ,i ... .. ,• , r r .I r ..,. i n:?, an:-:r-,'a^>a•-: .... ... .. .. ... .. .. a.. .. .. .. !t .li .. r r �}..v.. .... .. , ...tr _ :j;•%�=�. MM4.14-1 The components of future projects in the Specific Plan area Notes on construction Prior to Notes will be added to plans as well as CC&R's. shall incorporate the following measures to ensure that conservation and plans and conditions, issuance of efficient water use practices are implemented per project. Project covenants and building proponents,as applicable,shall: restrictions(CC&Rs), permits; ■ Require employees to report leaks and water losses immediately and as applicable Prior to final shall provide information and training as required to allow for efficient inspection reporting and follow up, ■ Educate employees about the importance and benefits of water conservation. ■ Create water conservation suggestion boxes,and place them in prominent areas. ■ Install signs in restrooms and cafeterias that encourage water conservation. ■ Assign an employee to evaluate water conservation opportunities and effectiveness. ■ Develop and implement a water management plan for its facilities that includes methods for reducing overall water use. ■ Conduct a water use survey to update current water use needs, (Processes and equipment are constantly upgrading,thus changing the need for water in some areas.) ■ Repair leaks.Check the water supply system for leaks and turn off unnecessary flows. ■ Utilize water-efficient irrigation systems and drought tolerant plant palette and insure that sprinklers are directing water to landscape areas,and not to parking lots,sidewalks or other paved areas. ■ Adjust the irrigation schedule for seasonal changes. e Install low-flow or waterless frxtures in public and employee restrooms. a Instruct cleaning crews to use water efficiently for mopping. ■ Use brooms,squeegees,and wet/dry vacuums to clean surfaces before washing with water;do not use hoses as brooms.Sweep or blow paved areas to clean,rather than hosing off(applies outside,not inside). ■ Avoid washing building exteriors or other outside structures. ■ Sweep and vacuum parking lots/sidewalkslwindow surfaces rather than washing with water. ■ Switch from°wer carpet cleaning methods,such as steam,to"dry," powder methods.Change window-cleaning schedule from"periodic"to "as required." ■ Set automatic optic sensors on icemakers to minimum fill levels to provide lowest possible daily requirement,Ensure units are air-cooled and not water-cooled. Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 224 21 ........,..• 1 .,..,.:4,....t S. 5 ,. „`L a. .S. ...x ,•..\.., .i .. 7.. ,_< ......:., .. ..•...,, .1•' -'a7• :tr .i a a.r• ..-. r::riz. } tt i tt 'y �•.q�, r- 1:-�, o r• .rl i• rY .. ._l. :,..:r,,,;.\...,.�'•:;. ..1 .. ,,.�..rin.:.. .•,<....r.._<".:,t�_,r .4-T4:e.:. �! :Y �;r::7 ..... . ..,. r..,,,r .,, a.. ....... ............7 .,,..... ...... ....,. ,c\-- L., r, ..-,:.: )) Sys `.s,,, tr:. 1 .,. .6,. .,'},,,a\ sr t,u +l- ••7. mod', ./ 'SYv r. ,S L (��. f -..I: R i 'i r \5 ^.�.: "f" ,,•4tI V,;• .1,: t::..p�`Yi+.'IY, J •�^'tn•; t (I1.1!'. !r `::`ur,.r.:!rr;,. �rsr� ,L.t,: ,i".:!`'9sr •f I. t....ti <I .:S. .>I• r';;;; !, ,,:' '•._..'.... .:. .�. .-.•.. _..-..,,:,. _.<._...__•., .r.r,,..Lu,.•=f..lc,i +'UI��.,1:�+t�I�+,.S:�a 'r'f%f{t�.n�,F.Ly;J,li.1.,t,{+::I T�' � 7 1�l I;I ■ Control the flow of water to the garbage disposal ■ Install and maintain spray rinsers for pot washing and reduce flow of spray rinsers for prewash ■ Turn off dishwashers when not in use—wash only full loads ■ Scrape rather than rinse dishes before washing ■ Operate steam tables to minimize excess water use ■ Discontinue use of water softening systems where possible ■ Ensure water pressure and flows to dishwashers are set a minimum required setting i ■ Install electric eye sensors for conveyer dishwashers ■ Retrofit existing flushometer(tankless)toilets with water-saving diaphragms and coordinate automatic systems with work hours so that they don't run continuously ■ Use a shut-off nozzle on all hoses that can be adjusted down to a fine spray so that water flows only when needed, ■ Install automatic rain shutoff device on sprinkler systems ■ Launder hotel linens per room by request or after vacancy MM4.14-2 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that adequate Sewer capacity Prior to Analysis will be performed and steps taken to capacity in the wastewater collection system is demonstrated from the analysis issuance of insure compliance with this measure. specific development site discharge location to the nearest OCSD main or building trunk line to accommodate discharges from the specific development permits project. If capacity is demonstrated as adequate, no upgrades will be required. If capacity is not adequate, the City of Huntington Beach shall Infrastructure and identify corrective action(s)required by the specific development Applicant Improvement Plans to ensure adequate capacity. Corrective action could include, but is not limited to: ■ Upsize new sewer pipes,as identified in sewer analysis(CR4.14-3) ■ Discharge assessment fees/districts to upsize sewer lines at downstream locations or where contributing areas are large ■ In-lieu fees to implement system-wide wastewater collection infrastructure improvements ■ Other mechanisms as determined by the City Department of Public Works. Because some wastewater collection system constraints may be located far down gradient from the actual development site,several properties may serve to contribute to system capacity constraints. Therefore, the City Department of Public Works shall assess each development and system ' characteristics to identify the best method for achieving adequate capacity in the wastewater collection system. The City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works shall review the sewer analysis and determine required corrective action(s)or if a waiver of corrective action is applicable. The site-specific development Applicant 22 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Ci24ckli5t -r;:�..% „%/,".`Irf:!j\;�I�FIv,:;j,.,.)'•Er`:i'l:r:ti•1:7:ii�1':i1:1:! ,.,,'.�:1f': t'J' :tt'f•Y..,t r! r)'w k ,.t ../ 'i, t' ..t-I rlti:. s, •s',ra,;, ,,,�.:r:,..r 71 •rv• •.t:t: _!. 1 1 .,,, v., .,Y, n., .(... ,. .,�.. ... r t°'<< Ay, } • •r:n np. 1 .i. r V d:+�., z 1 f t.,,. r.:•: r Y.Y�f 1 ,If. t.1. v l r 4 + P.f< +, a i r � ,. -,, f: yr"�r..h.•.`3� ,1:: I. � l .I °f , �r }' b 7 i..k. ? •'Y",'; =r'. ., 3' , �rt �u 1' �.„.,•,t'. .�.1 .i� t t � Frj 5'1,), ); 11 tl o o M, A^ I?"' U f• .f.. ,%.l .,5... Z. zJ r+ h�. 1 •r.1S YS .3 �t ,J: ;I' y r t P£ ,t.Si j ��jF��,� 't.! -,f r :Li'� ff J2 V 1<r r.. t •tr:, i .1S ,,. ,(fir 4r Alt„ :•n.a. t � •� 3f .f:� � /ti')'• !t'i5: '-/ ,, j �� J [t x,- 1. fi• \::4 �: .'� k):, a't!< .iJi,l ('. ys; t,o :.d, 2 1 .t .�6..,%1.. t,: ,•i r. „r. ,�t Y {� •�'' :rt£ •<Ia Y("�' Cd). .},':. r, {. f, l.a. 't'ki. t",. .�, 4.r '.E,,::l.Fr, � r•�" >r: 1 ..rl } `f' s..5� S• r(t {� { c 7!rc" ,>J' .1 .f c'rr,• 'r .,,,;,'ti.:�!i,. 'a .J: � :•V. 'f ..J...,} Z `4t,,.7. J 1Q ,�rf� � .�', }., # :l:•e,, ,i_., '!>}„ •;v'.�, ).' „�t:.17C , !ll `� •Y J i"' �_ ,r .'sE• � t 5 EI N t,. 1.J f... ,'' Sr, { 1. �.t `� ur 1. .�J� .j t i I' P 'r•t 1-t � �.t,'• r,� ;�. r �t ,t ,f # r•�; o t • E.: c �. t. r a ~l;{' .,'t: ,t�"-'J .1 ,A ..l / �` :.(^.'s i•c�. ,�...?i a � J'.�l Ifz .,,,r• ,, .:v. } ,S...t+,. ...t .N• ,.+Y;,z)_I .�. :at t '� c, .5 ..};.� .n a' r,. � :K•�fa; .�t„ •,1:>~� S `�'," } , ,� Ed, .t-, }.: ,.1 �.. Lli�;/,,}.<,:,,. ,.{• a>�/,p.t� b sr,s .r;, rr, ( �:a i f i ,u ,1 (�, ,f. n:1.7r.,.r'r'.�.�,4.{':!�_dt=�A�,,.��.�#.Y";fG t,:t7i� .t�:lY,• "">Jlr)7!f) +(-l:'ri ,.t, r,(J,l'ffl, � 13�; -:i: iti;�11>:�'.`�{,.,;� ..r,i (�3r.n� �� �v+11,,.sSf�7R':.J>I flit�.N3,y1:{,..:T�E:,.il�_1 >it .4. If•irJt '�s,.d,.�ili,�'r .i ,.i?tt,:'{ ;•�,.,$����S�,s�tl;l ,r,.;�/.rr,. � oirr ?�I� ! J J ,t r !,1 t . .lar!r y fi� ''�i� �,i,f„S 1,;,;A:n.,. I {Li}.,,t iJ:c I")4 j«:•,;f_;;:. r: .... +n ` r..,... --.a.? f.tY'R:• r ,j'�';31 �id.{It a.:x,J:1: .f I tl•'irt,-,.,f.1 i .-. shall incorporate required corrective actions info their project design and/or plan. Prior to Final Inspection, the City Department of Public Worfcs shall ensure that required corrective action has been implemented, ,• 5. t ,j•::;r.,,':::-.:�Ni4r.r•i.-:>.,!b• _.. a "c-,1,:-:: •.::.,f�..,e.r"t;:r .+:I , .. ... . .. F.t.. ,i'. ..... .. r, ,.. ..,it..,.,,....I:.. ., :.. .."_�:. ,yt I%•dir"• g� .,r,._.. p j1tT1•�8 . .. � . .. r... .. ..... ..n t r r .. ... .,.r.. : . ,.., rr.. , .I r. .•�• nc..•,' r.. t• I .. .r .. ........ .. ... ..... : .... 7 v. .. .. .:.......�,. :..: ..f, :.,£r.<.. .]I /+ 'I• , U1. .\y. , .. ..: ... . . ,.ti't. >..t., t <.r „J.,: I:• r4, 'f ;..{' ! "'i;;;;,:.a:,, I. ..n . .... .,.,,... ... ........:. .. ..... .... .i.. .,..... ...., ..,r. .1 .. .� r.. pp ..E. i..,�ii�r:�•,:.r:.,•;�:;>ct p},,,:.,. �r !! !.�, :,.....� f't<.e.c .. ... ... .. .. ..... .. .... .. . .... {1 .,, ,... ..., .. t ., ,: .f= r r. .�,.rs 9�:. .>,.la,.f.,y.r •.:L..,.lmt.,::,..'>.1,;•.:{:.. t:a)Y,ttir:. 1�i,i•t.: .l...a. .iT'}.. .ql.:r:i,.,.:;.';!.::•r ... .,... t,.:..§}•Sp ;irl +,•t.tt;•`;.k.:::1:.:.,•o-a.e.r!rn:r,,;i;:}(.,,k:';.., {,,::. Y{tah..;.: 'Sn.•, i.lht.i .n t. ...ts,.,,..':..y::::•%_,.»,.r.t.:;tl ..,�i, q.,,.. ::•y.1:)::::t,'4''1•: '?C:: •',,:::!:,;:Et fit!:; :r.;r rni�'�.::1 ria;fi'x'��s�:�ra;llt!r.r„1!v✓t.,':::::., it:...i...,.:. :.by,..r„c,.•Ir..:.,•, ,.,.a,�:.dd,r-,•x:..a;:,,:!n. MM4.15-1 The City shall require by contract specifications that all diesel- Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check powered equipment used would be retrofitted with after-treatment products and notes on grading prior to process and the contractor will be required to (e.g,, engine catalysts and other technologies available at the time plans and construction issuance of abide by these specifications. construction commences) to the extent that they are readily available and plans a grading cost effective when construction activities commence. Contract permit specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. MM4.15.2 The City shall require by contract specifications that alternative Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check fuel construction equipment(i.e.,compressed natural gas,liquid petroleum and notes on grading prior to process and the contractor will be required to gas, and unleaded gasoline)would be utilized to the extent feasible at the plans and construction issuance of abide by these specifications. time construction activibes commence. Contract specifications shall be plans a grading included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be permit approved by the City of Huntington Beach. MM4,15-3 The City shall require by contract specifications that developers Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check within the project site use locally available building materials,to the extent and notes on prior to process and the contractor will be required to feasible,such as concrete, stucco, and interior finishes, for construction of construction plans issuance of abide by these specifications. the project and associated infrastructure. a building permit MM4,15-4 The City shall require developers within the project site to Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check establish a construction management plan with Rainbow Disposal to divert and notes on grading prior to process and the contractor will be required to a target of 50 percent of construction,demolition,and site clearing waste, plans and construction issuance of abide by these specifications, plans a grading or building permit, which occurs earlier MM4,15.5 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check construction equipment engines will be maintained in good condition and in and notes on grading prior to process and the contractor will be required to proper tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of plans and construction issuance of abide by these specifications. construction. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed plans a grading project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of permit Huntington Beach. i Beach and Edinger Condors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist 226 23 -p 1 .23. wv�A R, .......... MM4.15-6 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor and notes on grading priorto process and the contractor will be required to vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for plans and construction issuance of abide by these specifications. more than five minutes. Diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles with plans a grading gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be permit turned off when not in use for more than five minutes. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach, MM4.15-7 The City shall require that any new development within the Contract language Plan check Project does not provide for a loading dock. Specific Plan area provide signs within loading dock areas clearly visible to and notes on priorto truck drivers. These signs shall state that trucks cannot idle in excess of construction plans issuance of five minutes per trip. a building permit MOM The City shall require by contract specifications that electrical Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check outlets are included in the building design of future loading docks to allow and notes on prior to process. use by refrigerated delivery trucks. Future project-specific Applicants shall construction plans issuance of require that all delivery trucks do not idle for more than five minutes. If a building loading and/or unloading of perishable goods would occur for more than permit five minutes,and continual refrigeration is required,all refrigerated delivery trucks shall use the electrical outlets to continue powering the truck refrigeration units when the delivery truck engine is turned off. MM4.15-9 The City shall require that any new development within the Contract language Plan check Notes will be added to plans during plan check project site provide a bulletin board or kiosk in the lobby of each proposed and notes on prior to process. structure that identifies the locations and schedules of nearby transit construction plans issuance of opportunities, certificate of occupancy 24 Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring C4 klist Aube, Nicolle From: Pamela Mccay <pmccay85@g mail.com> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 2:19 PM To: Aube, Nicolle Subject: Ellis Ave Condos Hi Nicolle, I will unfortunately not be able to make it to the city council meeting as I am a nightshift RN and work that night. I'm hoping that my email is as sufficient at voicing my concerns for this complex. I am born and raised in Huntington Beach and I currently live at 18311 Patterson Ave, #2.This is my third time living on this street in the last ten years and I have currently been in my apartment for 4 years. My neighborhood, which is directly behind this proposed site, already has horrendous parking due to the entire neighborhood being fourplexes. We have been having a problem with Elan parking on our street because they do not want to pay for the monthly parking fee to park there on top of their astronomical rent. I have actually spoken to residents while they park in front of my house. They also told me that they tell their guest to park on our street as well. We see people every day walking to and from their cars and Elan. (And no, they are not using the crosswalk on beach) I have been petitioning to get our neighborhood permit parking and all of the residents are in favor of this. On top of the terrible parking, getting in and out of the neighborhood is horrendous. I can't even come out on my own street because the traffic is often backed up all the way to the next exit. Sometimes I can't even get out on that street (Goodwin). This intersection is already a dangerous area and I was almost t- boned coming into my tract on Monday morning on my way home from work. Adding even more traffic and congestion to this intersection will be a disservice to the city and increase the amount of accidents that already occur here. I personally know someone who was side swiped due to someone making a left turn out of the DK/jack in the box parking lot, which is I'm sure the proposed driveway for this complex. I know these complexes are all about making money for the developers, who have already greased the palms of numerous council members to push this through. Our residents do not want this! Most of these complexes have rent so high that most people can't even afford it. I really hope this email helps keep this eye sore off this corner and keep traffic and accidents to a minimum and safety as the highest priority. Thank you for your time, Pamela McCay, BSN, RN i 228 OVJ REPUBLIC SERVICES April 4, 2018 Ref: MCG Architecture Re: Will serve letter for Ellis Ave Condos Please be advised that we have reviewed the proposed plans of the trash enclosures for Ellis Ave Condos. I have found the planning proposed to be accessibly to meet our requirements for providing refuse/recycling collection services to the proposed project. Thank you, Gus Sanchez Hauling Operations Manager 17121 Nichols Lane e sanchezg@republicservices.com o 657-845-6137 c 805-432-5957 w www.RepublicServices.com qjo W4. REPUBLIC SERVICES ,%'ee"1 handle 'ti trorn here." 229 City of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division Code Enforcement:Division Building Division 714/536-5271 714/375-5155 714/536-5241 May 22, 2019 Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture 111 Pacifica, Suite 280 Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17- 042 (ELLIS AVE. CONDOS) 8041 ELLIS AVE., 92646 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS Dear Mr. Herbst: In order to assist you with your development proposal, staff reviewed the project and identified applicable city policies, standard plans, and development and use requirements excerpted from the City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Codes. This list is intended to help you through the permitting process and various stages of project implementation. It should be noted this requirement list is in addition to any "conditions of approval' adopted by the Planning Commission. Please note that if the design of your project or if site conditions change, the list may also change based upon modifications to your project and the applicable city policies, standard plans, and development and use requirements. If you would like a clarification of any of these requirements, an explanation of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Codes, or believe some of the items listed do not apply to your project, and/or you would like to discuss them in further detail, please contact me at Nicolle,Aube&surfcity b.or� or (714) 374-1529 and/or contact the respective source department (contact person listed below). Sincerely, 4�6&/U�, Nicolle Aube Associate Planner Enclosures c: Khoa Duong, Building Division—(714)989-0213 Steve Eros, Fire Department—(714)536-5531 Jan Thomas, Police Department—(949)290-1604 Steve Bogart, Public Works Department—(714)374-1692 Jane James, Planning Manager Project File 230 a �1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: APRIL 24, 2019 PROJECT NAME: ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS PLANNING APPLICATION NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION N.O. 17-205 ENTITLEMENTS: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18-004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 1-8-001 DATE OF PLANS: APRIL 22, 2019 PROJECT LOCATION: 8041 ELLIS AVENUE (NORTH SIDE OF ELLIS AVENUE, EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD) PROJECT PLANNER: NICOLLE AUBE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PLAN REVIEWER: KHOA DUONG, P.E TELEPHONEIE-MAIL: (714) 989-0213 /khoa@csgengr.com PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 'INCLUDES UPDATED PLANS AND PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN' REQUEST TO DEMOLISH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LIQUOR STORE, AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING CARWASH TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR-STORY, 48-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT WITH 891 SF OF GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL AND THREE LEVELS OF SUBTERRANEAN PARKING ON A 0.955 ACRE SITE The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans stated above. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any, will also be provided upon final project approval. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer. 1. REQUIREMENT: 1. Development Impact Fees will be required for new construction and commercial/industrial additions. 2. Submit separate plans for all disciplines; Building 3 sets, MEP 2 sets each. 3. Landscape plan is a separate submittal for irrigation and plants only. No accessory structures or flat work will be reviewed on the landscape plans. 4. All site work for accessibility will be reviewed and inspected based on the approved architectural plans. 5. All accessory and minor accessory structures including site MEP will be on separate permits. 231 Page 2of4 II. CODE REQUIREMENTS BASED ON PLANS & DRAWINGS SUBMITTED: 1. Project shall comply with the current state building codes adopted by the city at the time of permit application submittal. Currently they are 2016 California Building Code (CBC), 2016 California Mechanical Code, 2016 California Plumbing Code, 2016 California Electrical Code, 2016 California Energy Code, 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, and the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC). Compliance to all applicable state and local codes is required prior to issuance of building permit. 2. Provide all project implementation code requirements and conditions of approval on the approved building plans. 3. Provide building code analysis including type of construction, allowable area and height, occupancy group requirements, exterior wall ratings (per chapter 5 and 7), and means of egress per the 2016 CBC. 4. For mixed use and occupancy, please see-Sections 508 and 509 of CBC.for specific code parameters in addition to those applicable sections found elsewhere in the code. 5. For parking garages please see Section 406 of CBC for specific code parameters in addition to those applicable sections found elsewhere in the code. 6. Provide complete Site plan to show: • The setback between building and property line. • The length of projections from the exterior walls. • Each Floor level, please show the setback between exterior walls (both above ground and underground structures) and property line. 7. Provide "Project Data"to show: • Type of building constructions • Occupancy groups • Building area for each type of occupancy within the building • Floor areas/building areas • Number of stories • Building with fire sprinkler system 8. Provide compliance to disabled accessibility requirements of Chapter 11A and/or 11 B of the 2016 CBC. Including an accessible path of travel to the public way. • Please indicate on Site plan the accessible paths of travel from public sidewalk to building entrances. • Show location of all curb ramps/truncated domes within the accessible paths of-travel. • All areas/units must be accessible to disable persons. • Parking garage must be accessible to disable persons. • For van accessible parking stall(s), the unloading zone must be located on the passenger side. Please identify the location of Van accessible parking stall(s) on Floor plans. 9. Residential Unit— • Please review kitchen layout plans to comply with Section 1133A. • Please review bathroom layout plans to comply with Section 1134A. 232 Page 3 of 4 • Please check required light and ventilation for all residential units to comply with Section 1203 and 1205 of 2016 CBC. • Emergency escape and rescue must comply with Section 1029 of 2016 CBC. 10. Provide egress analysis. Please review the exit system serving all levels. • Show the occupant load-in each area/room/floor along with occupant load factors. • Identify on floor plans location of all fire rated corridors, stairway shafts, and extension of fire rated shafts. • All interior stairways shall be enclosed per Section 1022 of CBC. 11. For elevators please see Section 708.14 and Chapter 30 of CBC. • Elevator enclosures shall comply with Section 708. • Provide elevator lobby per Section 708.14. 12. Review and provide compliance with Title 17 of the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Building and Construction. This document can be found online on the city's website. 13. For projects that will include multiple licensed professions in multiple disciplines, i.e. Architect and professional engineers for specific disciplines, a Design Professional in Responsible Charge will be requested per the 2016 CBC, Section 107.3.4. 14. In addition to all of the code requirements of the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, specifically address Construction Waste Management per Sections 4.408.2, 4.408.3, 4,408.4, 5.408.1.1, 5.408.1.2, 5.408.1.3 and Building Maintenance and Operation, Section 5.410. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the permitee will be required to describe how they will comply with the sections described above. Prior to Building Final Approval, the city will require a Waste Diversion Report per Sections 4.408.5 and 5.408.1.4. 15. The City of Huntington Beach has adopted the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, including Sections 4.106.4.1 for Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging for New Construction, and 5.106.5.3-Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging. 16.Trash enclosure will require a drain, vent and trap primer connected to the building sewer system. Rain water is not permitted in the building sewer so a cover will be required. Ill. COMMENTS: 1. Planning and Building Department encourage the use-of pre-submittal building plan check meetings. 2. Separate Building, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Permits will be required for all exterior accessory elements of the project, including but not limited to: fireplaces, fountains, sculptures, light poles, walls and fences over 42" high, retaining walls over 2' high, detached trellises/patio covers, gas piping, water service, backflow anti-siphon, electrical, meter pedestals/electrical panels, swimming pools, storage racks for industrial/commercial projects. It will be the design professional in charge, responsibility to coordinate and submit the documents for the work described above. 3. Provide on all plan submittals for building, mechanical, electrical and plumbing permits, the Conditions of Approval and Code Requirements that are associated with the project through the entitlement process. If there is a WQMP, it is required to be attached to the plumbing plans for plan check. 4. Mandatory requirements for solar ready buildings; single-family residential, low-rise residential, hotel/ motel occupancies and high-rise multifamily buildings, all other nonresidential buildings, CALGREEN Section 110.10 233 Page 4 of 4 5. Provide on all plan submittals for building, mechanical, electrical and plumbing permits, the Conditions of Approval and Code Requirements that are associated with the project through the entitlement process. If there is a WQMP, it is required to be attached to the plumbing plans for plan check. 6. Mandatory requirements for solar ready buildings; single-family residential, low-rise residential, hotel/ motel occupancies and high-rise multifamily buildings, all other nonresidential buildings, CALGREEN Section 110.10 234 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH H FIRE DEPARTMENT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS HUNTINGTON BEACH- DATE: APRIL 23, 2019 PROJECT NAME: ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS PLANNING APPLICATION NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 17-205 ENTITLEMENTS: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 18-001 DATE OF PLANS: MARCH 7, 2019 PROJECT LOCATION: 8041 ELLIS AVENUE (NORTH SIDE OF ELLIS AVENUE, EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD) PROJECT PLANNER: NICOLLE AUBE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PLAN REVIEWER: STEVE EROS, FIRE PROTECTION ANALYST TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: (714) 536-5531 Steve.Eros(q)_surfcity-hb.org PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ***UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, LANDSCAPING, HYDROLOGY, WQMP, TRAFFIC STUDY, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, AND GRADING*** REQUEST TO DEMOLISH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, -LIQUOR STORE, AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING CARWASH TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR-STORY, 48-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT WITH 891 SF OF GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL AND THREE LEVELS OF SUBTERRANEAN PARKING ON A 0.955 ACRE SITE The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans stated above.. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any, will also be provided upon final project approval. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, GRADING, SITE DEVELOPMENT, ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS, BUILDING PERMITS, AND/OR CONSTRUCTION, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE REQUIRED: Overall note: The project has proposed a conceptual Alternate Means & Methods (AM&M) strategy to satisfy the exterior hose pull distance requirements. The AM&M has been reviewed and approved by the HBFD. The AM&M will not be formally approved and accepted until the project has received their entitlements. 235 Page 2 o€12 i. Fire Master Plan The Fire Master Plan shall be completed and approved prior to precise grading plan or building plan approval. A separate Fire Master Plan is required for submittal to the HBFD. It shall be a site plan reflecting all the following fire department related items: ➢ Fire hydrant locations, public and private. ➢ FDC locations. ➢ Dimensions from FDC's to hydrants. ➢ DCDA locations. ➢ Fire sprinkler riser locations and location of system serving. ➢ FACP locations. ➢ Knox box and Knox switch locations. ➢ Gate locations, and Opticoms if required. ➢ Fire lane locations, dimensions, lengths, turning radii at corners and circles/cul- de-sacs. ➢ Fire lane signage and striping. (Option 1, 2, or 3 per City Spec. #415) ➢ Property dimensions or accurate scale. ➢ Building locations and heights. ➢ Building addresses and suite addresses. (FD) -2. Environmental The following items shall be completed prior to rough or precise grading plan approval. Environmental Methane Mitigation Requirements Due to the proposed location of construction, soil gas testing for methane gas is required. A methane sample plan shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval, prior to the commencement of sampling. 236 Page 3 of 12 (Methane Mitigation Requirements cont.) If methane gas is discovered in the soil, the following City Specification would be applicable and the grading, building, and methane plans must reference that a sub-slab methane barrier and vent system will be installed per City Specification#429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements prior to plan approval. Additional methane mitigation measures may be required by the fire department. Methane safety measures per City Specification #429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements shall be detailed on a separate sheet titled "METHANE PLAN" and two copies submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. (FD) City Specification # 431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards testing is required. Based on site characteristics, suspected soil contamination, proximity to a producing/abandoned oil well, or Phase 1, 11, or III Site Audit, soil testing conforming to City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards is required. All soils shall conform to City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards prior to the issuance of a building permit. Building plans shall reference that "All soils shall conform to City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards" in the plan notes. Prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits, the following is required to demonstrate compliance with City Specifications#429 and # 431-92. 1) Soil Sampling Work Plan: Render the services of a qualified environmental consultant to prepare and submit a soil sampling work plan to the HBFD for review and approval. Once the HBFD reviews and approves the submitted work plan, the sampling may commence. Note:Soil shall not be exported to other City of Huntington Beach locations without first being demonstrated to comply with City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean Up Standards. Also, any soil proposed for.import to the site shall first be demonstrated to comply with City Specification #431- 92. 2) Soil Sampling Lab Results: Conduct the soil sampling in accordance with the HBFD approved work plan. After the sampling is conducted, the lab results (along with the Environmental Consultants summary report) for methane and #431-92 testing shall be submitted to the HBFD for review. 3) Remediation Action Plan: If contamination is identified, provide a Fire Department approved Remediation Action Plan (RAP) based on requirements found in Huntington Beach City Specification #431-92, Soil Cleanup Standard. All soils shall conform to City Specification #431- 92 Soil Clean-Up Standards prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. (FD) Discovery of soil contamination/pipelines, etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and an approved remedial work plan submitted. (FD) 237 Page 4 of 12 Remediation Action Plan. if soil contamination is identified, the applicant must provide a Fire Department approved Remediation Action Plan (RAP) based on requirements found in Huntington Beach City Specification #431-92, Soil Cleanup Standard. Upon remediation action plan approval, a rough grading permit may be issued. (FD) Imported Soil Plan. All imported soil shall meet City Specification #431-92, Soil Cleanup Standards. An "Imported Soil Work Plan" must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to importing any soil from off site. Once approved, the soil source can be sampled per the approved work plan, then results sent to the HBFD for review. No rough grade will be approved prior to the actual soil source approval. Multiple soil sources requited separate sampling as.per the approved work plan, with no soil being imported until each source has been verified to meet the CS #431-92 requirements. (FD) 3. Fire Apparatus Access The following items shall be completed prior to rough or precise grading plan approval. Fire Access Roads shall be provided and maintained in compliance with City Specification #401, Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access. Driving area shall be capable of supporting a fire apparatus (75,000 lbs and 12,000 lb point load). Minimum fire access road width is twenty-four feet (24') wide, with thirteen feet six inches (13' 6") vertical clearance. Fire access roads fronting commercial buildings shall be a minimum width of twenty-six feet (26') wide, with thirteen feet six inches (13' 6") vertical clearance. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with City Specification #401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access on the.plans. (FD) This review adequately addresses the following HBFD comments: • Information on the `bulb' in the center of the proposed department access road turnaround. • Initially proposed arch at the vehicle entry to the site is not present. ,Maximum Grade For-Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall not exceed 10%. (FD) This review adequately addresses the following HBFD comments: • Ramp to the subterranean parking area is not intended to be part of the fire department access lane. Continued next page 238 Page 5of12 Hose Pull Lengths —The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of Section 503.1.1 of the Huntington Beach Fire Code_ All access roads shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or-facility- NOTE: The north side of the building exceeds the 150-foot hose pull requirement required in Section 503.1.1. The applicant has submitted a conceptual Alternate Materials & Methods proposal that has been accepted by the HBFD. The following alternates will be added for this project. • An addition standpipe hose connection on the north side of the building. • Graphic Annunciator • All in-unit smoke alarms will be upgraded to smoke detectors that are tied into the fire alarm system. • An upgraded sprinkler system to provide an increased sprinkler density. No Parking shall be allowed in the designated 24 foot wide fire apparatus access road or supplemental fire access per City Specification #415. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with City Specification # 415 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access on the plans. (FD) Fire Lanes, as determined by the Fire Department, shall be posted, marked, and maintained per City Specification #415, Fire Lanes Signage and Markings on Private, Residential, Commercial and Industrial Properties. The site plan shall clearly identify all red fire lane curbs, both in location and length of run. The location of fire lane signs shall be depicted. No parking shall be allowed in the designated 24 foot wide fire apparatus access road or supplemental fire access per City Specification #415. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with City Specification # 401 Minimum Standards for Fire Apparatus Access on the plans. (FD) Continued next page Emergency Escape and Rescue openings shall be required per CBC and CFC Section 1029. Demonstrate compliance with these code sections on the plans. 239 Page 6 of 12 This review adequately addresses the following HBFD comments: • Ground ladder access to Emergency Escape and Rescue openings on the west side of the building Remaining-Note not Addressed: • Ground ladder access compliant with the dimensions and angles found at the following link needs to demonstrated for the following units. This area of the building is adjacent to the sloped vehicle ramp serving the subterranean parking area and may present challenges to meet the specified dimensions and angles. • Units 2E, 2F, 2G, 3F, 3G & 3H. • Link: Details on these requirements can be found on in Attachment 5, on page 65 of the following link: https://www,ocfa.org/Uploads/CommunityRiskReduction/OCFA Guide- E04-Architectural Review.pdf 4. Fire Suppression Systems The following items shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Fire Extinguishers shall be installed and-located in all areas to comply with Huntington Beach Fire Code standards found in City Specification #424. The minimum required dry chemical fire extinguisher size is 2A 10BC and shall be installed within 75 feet travel distance to all portions of the building. Extinguishers are required to be serviced or replaced annually. (FD) Fire Alarm System is required. A building fire alarm system is required. For Fire Department approval, shop drawings shall be submitted to the Fire Department as separate plans for permits and approval. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance with CFC Chapter 9 and NFPA 72 on the plans. A C-10 electrical contractor, certified in fire alarm-systems,.must certify the system is operational annually. (FD) Continued next page Automatic Fire Sprinklers are required. NFPA13 Automatic fire sprinkler systems are required per Huntington Beach Fire Code for new buildings with "fire areas" 5000 240 Page 7of12 square feet or more or for buildings 10,000 square feet or more. An addition of square footage to an existing building also triggers this requirement. Separate plans (two sets) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for permits and approval. Automatic fire sprinkler systems must be maintained operational at all times, with maintenance inspections performed quarterly and the system serviced every five years by a state licensed C-16 Fire Protection Contractor. For Fire Department approval, reference that a fire sprinkler system will be installed in compliance with the California Fire Code, NFPA 13, and City Specification #420 -Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in the plan notes. NOTE: When buildings under construction are more than one (1) story in height and required to have automatic fire sprinklers, the fire sprinkler system shall be installed and operational to protect all floors lower than the floor currently under construction. Fire sprinkler systems for the current floor under construction shall be installed, in-service, inspected and approved prior to beginning construction on the next floor above. Exception: Buildings entirely of Type 1 or Type 2 construction. (FD) .Fire Department Connections (FDC) to the automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be located to the front of the building, at least 10 feet from and no farther than 100 feet of a properly rated fire hydrant. (FD) Class 1 Standpipes (2 Y2" NFH connections) are required at each stairway. The standpipe system in stairwells cannot protrude into, impede, or compromise the CBC "Exit Width" requirements. For FireDepartment approval, reference and portray Class 1 standpipes at each stairway in the plan notes. (FD) Smoke alarms and Carbon Monoxide alarms are required per CBC and CFC Sections 907.2.11 and 915, respectively. 5. Fire Hydrants and Water Systems The following items shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Fire Hydrants are required. Hydrants must be portrayed on the site plan. Hydrants shall be installed and in service before combustible construction begins. Installation of hydrant and service mains shall meet NFPA 13 and 24, 2016 Edition, California Fire Code Appendix B and C, and City Specification #407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards requirements. Maximum allowed velocity of fire flow in supply piping is 12 fps. Plans shall be submitted to Public Works and approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments for connection to street main and DCDA. For Fire Department (Fire Hydrants cant.) 241 Page 8 of 12 approval of all piping downstream of the DCDA and the private hydrant, submit a separate plan to the HBFD reflecting the fire hydrant location and meeting all requirements of the 2016 CFC, NFPA 13 and 24, and City Specification #407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards. Reference this in the plan notes. (FD) Private Fire Hydrants are required. City Specification #407 requires an onsite Fire Hydrants when portions of the building are further than 150 feet from an approved fire apparatus access road. Fire Hydrants must be portrayed on the site plan. Hydrants shall be installed and in service before combustible construction begins. Installation of hydrants and service mains shall meet NFPA 13 and 24, 2016 Edition, Huntington Beach Fire Code Appendix B and C, and-City Specification #407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards requirements. Private fire hydrants shall not be pressurized by Fire Department Connections to the sprinkler system. The system design shall ensure that recirculation of pressurized water from the hydrant, thru the FDC and back through the sprinkler system supply to the hydrant does not occur. Installation of the private fire service main, including fire department connections, shall meet NFPA 13 and 24, 2016 Edition requirements. Maximum allowed velocity of fire flow in supply piping is 12 fps. The maintenance of private fire hydrants is the responsibility of the owner or facility association. Shop drawings shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department. For Fire Department approval, portray the fire hydrants and reference compliance with City Specification #407 Fire Hydrant Installation Standards in the plan notes. (FD) Private Fire Service Connection to the Public Water Supply- Separate plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department detailing the connection, piping, valves and back-flow prevention assembly (DDCA) for approval and permits. Approval by Public Works and the Fire Department must be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit. The dedicated private fire water service off-site improvements shall be shown on a precise grading plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer. (FA) 6. Fire Personnel Access Main Secured Building Entries shall utilize a KNOX® Fire Department Access Key Box, installed and in compliance with City Specification #403, Fire Access for Pedestrian or Vehicular Security Gates &-Buildings. Please contact the Huntington Beach Fire Department Administrative Office at (714) 536-5411 for information. Reference compliance with City Specification #403 - KNOX@ Fire Department Access-in the building plan notes. (FD) Roof Access is required. At least one stair shall extend to the roof from grade level and have an exterior door available for fire fighter access. (FD) Exterior doors and openings required by the CBC or CFC (see CFC Section 504.1 and 504.2) shall be maintained readily accessible for emergency access by the fire department. An approved access walkway leading from fire apparatus access roads to exterior openings shall be provided. (FD) 242 Page 9of12 Fire Sprinkler System Controls access shall be provided, utilizing a KNOX9) Fire Department Access Key Box, installed and in compliance with City Specification #403, Fire Access for Pedestrian or Vehicular Security Gates & Buildings. The approximate location of the system controls shall be noted on the plans. Reference compliance in the plan notes. (FD) Elevators shall be sized to accommodate an ambulance gurney. Minimum interior dimensions are 7 feet (84") wide by 4 feet 3 inches (51°) deep. Minimum door opening dimensions are 3 feet 6 inches (42") wide right or left side opening. Center opening doors require a 4 feet 6 inches (54") width. For Fire Department approval, reference and demonstrate compliance on the building plans. (FD) 7. Addressing and Street Names The following items shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Structure or Building Address Assignments. The Planning Department shall review and make address assignments. The individual dwelling units shall be identified with numbers per City Specification #409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process. For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with City Specification #409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process in the plan notes. (FD)- Residential(SFD) Address Numbers shall be installed to comply with City Specification #428, Premise Identification. Number sets are required on front of the structure in a contrasting color with the background and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") high with one and one half inch ('h") brush stroke.. For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with City Specification #428, Premise Identification in the plan notes and portraythe address location on the building. (FD) Individual Units Addresses. Individual units shall be identified and numbered per City Specification#409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process through the Planning Department. Unit address numbers shall be a minimum of four inches (4") affixed to the units front door in a contrasting color. For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with City Specification #409 Street Naming and Address Assignment Process, in the plan notes and portray the address and unit number of the individual occupancy area. (FD) 8. GIS Mapping Information The following items shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. a. GIS Mapping Information shall be provided to the Fire Department in compliance with GIS Department CAD Submittal Guideline requirements. Minimum submittals shall include the following: 243 Page IO of I2 ➢ Site plot plan showing the building footprint. ➢ Specify the type of use for the building ➢ Location of electrical, gas, water, sprinkler system shut-offs. ➢ Fire Sprinkler Connections (FDC) if any. ➢ Knox Access locations for doors, gates, and vehicle access. ➢ Street name and address. Final site plot plan shall be submitted in the following digital format and shall include the following: ➢ Submittal media shall be via CD rom to the Fire Department. ➢ Shall be in accordance with County of Orange Ordinance 3809. ➢ File format shall be in .shp, AutoCAD, AUTOCAD MAP (latest possible release ) drawing file - .DWG (preferred) or Drawing Interchange File - .DXF. ➢ Data should be in NAD83 State Plane, Zone 6, Feet Lambert Conformal Conic Projection. ➢ Separate drawing file for each individual sheet. In compliance with Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen colors, and layering convention, and conform to City of Huntington Beach Specification # 409— Street Naming and Addressing. For specific GIS technical requirements, contact the Huntington Beach GIS Department at (714) 536-5574. For Fire Department approval, reference compliance with GIS Mapping Information in the building plan notes. (FD) 9. Building Construction, Fire Safety and Egress Components The following items shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Setback and Exterior Fire-Resistance Rating requirements are reflected in CA Building Code Tables 601 and 602. (FD) Emergency Responder Radio Coverage is required throughout all-portions of the structure(s) as per Chapter 5 of the CFC. A separate plan must be submitted to the HBFD for method of addressing this requirement. System must be tested, certified and then inspected once building construction is primarily complete but before the certificate of occupancy will be issued. (FD) Stairwell Required Minimum Widths. Standpipe systems in stairwell areas shall not impede code required minimum widths. (FD) 244 Page 11 of 12 Exit Signs And Exit Path Markings will be provided in compliance with the Huntington Beach Fire Code and Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Reference compliance in the plan notes. (FD) Gates and Barriers shall be able to open without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. Gates and barriers in a means of egress shall not be locked, chained, bolted, barred, latched or otherwise rendered unable to open at times when the building or area served by the means of egress is occupied, and shall swing in the direction of travel when required by the Building Code for exit doors. (FD) Posting Of Room Occupancy is required. Any room having an occupant load of 50 or more where fixed seats are not installed, and which is used for assembly purposes, shall have the capacity of the room posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit per CFC Chapter 10. (FD) Egress Illumination/Emergency Exit Lighting with emergency back-up power is required. Provide means of egress illumination as required by the CBC and CFC.(FD) Recreational or Decorative Fire Pits shall be fueled by domestic gas only and shall comply with the Huntington Beach Plumbing and Mechanical Codes and Huntington Beach Fire Department Guidelines for Recreational Fire Pits. (FD) THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION: a. HBFD approval must be obtained before lumber or other combustible building materials are brought onsite. The project will be required to demonstrate onsite roadways comply with fire access road requirements including all weather paving and load bearing performance, as well as hose pull distance. Water supply for fire suppression operations, namely fire hydrants, shall also be operable and demonstrate compliance. (FD) b. Fire/Emergency Access and Site Safety shall be maintained during project construction phases in compliance with CFC Chapter 33, Fire Safety during Construction and Demolition. (FD) OTHER: a. Discovery of additional soil contamination or underground pipelines., etc., must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly in compliance with City Specification #431-92 Soil Clean-Up Standards. (FD) b. Outside City Consultants: The Fire Department review of this project and subsequent plans may require the use of City consultants. The Huntington Beach City Council 245 Page 12of12 approved fee schedule allows the Fire Department to recover consultant fees from the applicant, developer or other responsible party. (FD) C. HBFD review and approval associated with any healthcare licensing processes must be completed before building occupancy. (FD) Fire Department City Specifications may be obtained at: Huntington Beach Fire Department Administrative Office City Hall 2000 Main Street, 51 floor Huntington Beach, CA 92648 or through the City's website at http://www huntingtonbeachca.gov/governmentidepartments/Fire/fire prevention code enforce ment/fire dept city si2ecifications.cfm If you have any questions, please contact the Fire Prevention Division at (714) 536-5411. 246 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW HUNTINGTON REACH DATE: MARCH 28,2019 PROJECT NAME: ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS PLANNING APP#: 17-205 ENTITLEMENTS: CUP 417-042 DATE OF PLANS: MARCH 7, 2019 PROJECT LOCATION: 8041 ELLIS AVE. (NORTH SIDE OF ELLIS AVE., EAST OF BEACH BLVD.) ASSIGNED PLANNER: JESSICA BUI,ASSOCIATE PLANNER PLAN REVIEWER: JAN THOMAS, CPTED CONSULTANT-HBPD TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: (949) 290-1604/ickthomas(u.cox.nct PROJECT DESCRIPTION: *Updated architectural plans, landscaping, hydrology, WQMP, tentative tract map, and grading. To demolish a single family residence, liquor store, and a portion of an existing carwash to construct a four-story 48-unit condominium development with 891 SF of ground floor commercial and three levels of subterranean parking on a 0.955 acre site. The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans stated above. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements,which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any,will also be provided upon final project approval. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer. No further concerns. December 23, 2019 comments: No concerns regarding revised plans. 247 Access control doors were added to the first floor residential hallway, as requested at our meeting with the developer. A cony of past comments is included below for reference: ENTRANCE Use enhanced paving at the driveway entrance to the project. WINDOW TO FRONT OF RESIDENCE Ideally, give each resident an opportunity to personalize,to a limited extent,the exterior of their unit. Each unit shows a kitchen facing the exterior walkway. Consider a design to incorporate a shelfing or display area in each kitchen window to allow each resident to personalize(take ownership) over the outward appearance of their individual unit. RADIO TRANSMISSION Ensure radio transmission works in this three-level subterranean parking. Public Safety radios might not transmit well in the lower levels.It is imperative that an effective antenna be installed so that emergency personnel can receive and transmit in the parking structure. Install a system conducive to public safety radio transmission. Contact Orange County Communications at(714) 704-7919 for specifics, if there are questions. POLICE ACCESS Concern: Is there a Knox-Box?Police must have access. Recommend: If there is a Knox-Box on the property, install a"duel"Knox-Box to ensure police officers, as well as firefighters, have access to the property. SURVEILLANCE Install surveillance cameras throughout the property and parking areas. Include elevators, stairwells, storage, courtyard, entrances and exits. 248 Concern: Is this access-controlled parking? How will guest parking be regulated?Guest parking is shown in the parking structure. Is there controlled access into the structure? If so,how do the guests park in the structure? It is recommended that 24n security personnel, as well as surveillance cameras(recorded)be positioned in the parking area, as well as in and around the property. Concern:,. Private storage area in the parking area should be equipped with a motion sensor light inside. Ideally,the door leading to the storage should contain a security window so residents can see into the storage area before entering. Panic hardware is recommended to be used inside the door. Storage door is shown to swing inward. Advise that the door swing outward,and equipped with emergency hardware, in case someone in the storage room needs to exit quickly to avoid a potential assault, etc. Concern: Lighting in parking area should be concentrated between the vehicles. Since most parking garage crime occurs between the vehicles, this area is especially important to light well. PRIVATE PATIO AND ROOF DECK: The roof deck will be used by residents from other units, as well as the residents who actually own a patio deck on that roof. There is a potential conflict between public(residents)use of the roof deck, and the semi-private patios owned by the residents that share that roof deck. This topic should be explored. For example,post roof deck hours. Even posting hours may not avoid a conflict of use in this area. 249 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS DATE: MAY 22, 2019 PROJECT NAME: ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS PLANNING APPLICATION NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO, 17-205 ENTITLEMENTS: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18-004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 18-001 DATE OF PLANS: APRIL 22, 2019 PROJECT LOCATION: 8041 ELLIS AVENUE(NORTH SIDE OF ELLIS AVENUE, EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD) PROJECT PLANNER: NICOLLE AUBE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PLAN REVIEWER: STEVE BOGART, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: 714-374-1692 /SBOGART(a)SURFCITY-HB.ORG PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ***UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, LANDSCAPING, HYDROLOGY, WQMP, TRAFFIC STUDY, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, AND GRADING*** REQUEST TO DEMOLISH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LIQUOR STORE,AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING CARWASH TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR-STORY,48-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT WITH 891 SF OF GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL AND THREE -LEVELS OF SUBTERRANEAN PARKING ON A 0.955 ACRE SITE The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans as stated above. The items below are to meet the City of Huntington Beach's Municipal Code(HBMC),Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO), Department of Public Works Standard Plans (Civil, Water and Landscaping) and the American Public Works Association (APWA) Standards Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book), the Orange County Drainage Area management Plan DAMP), and the City Arboricultural and Landscape-Standards and Specifications. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which shall be satisfied during the various stages of- project permitting, implementation and construction. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer or Project Planner. 250 8041 Ellis Avenue(PW Code Rqmts 4-25-19) Page 2 of 9 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL TRACT MAP UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. BONDING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT: 1. The following shall be shown as a dedication to the City of Huntington Beach on the Final Tract Map. (ZSO 230.84A& 253.10K) a. A 4-foot right-of-way dedication for street purposes along the Ellis Avenue project frontage for a curb to property line width of 12 feet. (BECSP) 2. A Hydrology and Hydraulic analysis shall be submitted for Public Works review and approval (10, 25, and 100-year storms shall be analyzed as applicable). The drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the Department of Public Works to mitigate impact of increased runoff due to development, or deficient, downstream systems. Design of all necessary drainage improvements shall provide mitigation for all rainfall event frequencies up to a 100-year frequency. Runoff shall be limited to existing 25-year flows, which must be established in the hydrology study. If the analyses shows that the City's current drainage system cannot meet the volume needs of the project runoff, the developer shall be required to attenuate site runoff to an amount not to exceed the existing 25-year storm as determined by the hydrology study. As an option, the developer may choose to explore low-flow design alternatives, onsite attenuation or detention, or upgrade the City's storm drain system to accommodate the impacts of the new development, at no cost to the City. (ZSO 230.84) The study shall also justify final pad elevations on the site in conformance with the latest FEMA requirements and City Standard Plan No. 300. (ZSO 255.04) 3. Confirmation from the Orange County Sanitation District(OCSD), to accept the.discharge from the new development into the existing OCSD sewer, shall be obtained. A copy shall be provided to the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department. 4. A qualified, Licensed Engineer shall prepare a detailed soils and geotechnical analysis. This analysis shall provide detailed recommendations for grading, chemical and fill properties, liquefaction, foundations, landscaping, dewatering, ground water, retaining walls, pavement sections and utilities. (ZSO 251.06 &253.12) 5. A Traffic Impact Analysis shall be prepared and submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The study shall include, but not limited to, analysis of site access from Ellis Avenue. Site access shall be limited to right-turn in/right-turn out only. 6. The grading and improvement plans shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The engineer shall submit cost estimates for determining bond amounts. (ZSO 255.16C & MC 17,05) 7. A Homeowners'Associations) (HOA)shall be formed and described in the CC&R's to manage the following for the total project area: a. Best Management Practices (BMP's as per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). 8. A reproducible Mylar copy and a print of the recorded final tract map shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works at the time of recordation. 251 5041 Ellis Avenue(PW Code Rqmts 4-25-19) Page 3 of 9 9. The engineer or surveyor preparing the final map shall comply with Sections 7-9-330 and 7-9-337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18 for the following item: a. Tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor. b. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the County of Orange. 10. Provide a digital-graphics file of said map to the City per the following design criteria: a. Design Specification: i. Digital data shall be full size (1:1) and in compliance with the California coordinate system—STATEPLANE Zone 6 (Lambert Conformal Conic projection), NAD 83 datum in accordance with the County of Orange Ordinance 3809. ii. Digital data shall have double precision accuracy (up to fifteen significant digits). iii. Digital data shall have units in US FEET. iv. A separate drawing file shall be submitted for each individual sheet. V. Digital data shall be in compliance with the Huntington Beach Standard Sheets, drawing names, pen color and layering conventions. vi. Feature compilation shall include, but shall not be limited to: Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN), street addresses and street names with suffix. b. File Format and Media Specification: vii. Shall be in compliance with one of the following file formats (AutoCAD DWG format preferred): • AutoCAD (version 2000, release 4) drawing file: .DWG • Drawing Interchange file: DXF viii. Shall be in compliance with the following media type: CD Recordable (CD-R) 650 Megabytes 11.All improvement securities (Faithful Performance, Labor and Material and Monument Bonds) and Subdivision Agreement shall be posted with the Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney, if it is desired to record"the final map or obtain building permits before completion of the required improvements. 12.A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with the Public Works Department and approved as to form by the City Attorney. 13. If the Final Tract.map is recorded before the required improvements are completed, a Subdivision Agreement and accompanying bonds may be submitted for construction in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. (SMA) 14.All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid. Fees shall be calculated based on the currently approved rate at the time of payment unless otherwise stated. (ZSO 250.16) 15.A drainage fee for the subject development shall be paid at the rate applicable at the time of Building Permit issuance. The current rate of $14,497 per gross acre is subject to periodic adjustments. This project consists of 1.045 gross acres (including its tributary area portions along the half street frontages) for a total required drainage fee of$15,149, City records indicate the previous use on 252 8041 Ellis Avenue(PW Code Rqmts 4-25-19) Page 4 of 9 this property never paid this required fee. Per provisions of the City Municipal Code, this one-time fee shall be paid for ail subdivisions or development of land. (MC 14A8) THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT: 1. A Legal Description and Plat of the dedications to City to be prepared by a licensed surveyor or registered Civil Engineer authorized to practice land surveying and submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The dedication shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2. The following dedications to the City of Huntington Beach shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. (ZSO 230.084A) a. A 4-foot right-of-way dedication for street purposes along the Ellis Avenue project frontage for a curb to property line width of 12 feet. (BECSP) 3. A Precise Grading Plan, prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. (MC 17.05/ZSO 230.84) The plans shall comply with Public Works plan preparation guidelines and include the following improvements on the plan: a. Damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk along the Ellis Avenue frontage shall be removed and replaced per Public Works Standard Plan Nos. 202 and 207. (ZSO 230.84) b. The proposed driveway approach on Ellis Avenue shall be constructed per Public Works Standard Plan No. 211. The driveway design shall include treatments for right-turn in/right-turn out only as specified by Public Works. This may include raised curb channelization, striping, and signage. (ZSO 230.84) c. The existing driveway approach on Ellis Avenue shall be removed and replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalk per Public Works Standard Plan Nos. 202 and 207. (ZSO 230.84) d. Frontage improvements along Ellis Avenue shall be constructed pursuant to City standard cedes, specifications, and the required street configuration and specifications of the Beach Edinger Corridor Specific Plan, Town Center Neighborhood segment. The required frontage improvements shall include new curb, gutter, sidewalk, parkway landscaping and irrigation, street pavement, street trees, street lighting, benches and trash receptacles. (BECSP, ZSO 230-84.D). e. New street lights shall be constructed pursuant to City Standard codes and specifications, and the required street configuration and-specifications of the Beach Edinger Corridor Specific Plan. (BECSP, ZSO 230-84.D). f. A new sewer lateral shall be installed connecting to the main in Ellis Avenue. If the new sewer lateral is not constructed at the same location as the existing lateral, then the existing lateral -shall-be severed and capped at the main or chimney. (ZSO 230.84) g. Any existing on-site public water pipeline (including removal of water appurtenances) impacted by the proposed structures, curbs, planters, parking facilities-, trees, walls, etc. shall be abandoned per Water Division Standards. (State of California Administrative Code; Title 17) h. Two (2) new domestic water master meters, one for the residential component and a second for the commercial portion, shall be installed per Water Division Standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the California Plumbing Code (CPC) i. Where a separate use (i.e. retail) is placed on the same parcel of property as the residential portion and the retail is conducting a separately established business, separate water services 253 8041 Ellis Avenue(PW Code Rqmts 4-25-19) Page 5 of 9 and meters shall be installed per Water Division Standards and sized to meet the minimum requirements-set by the California Plumbing Code (CPC). j. The existing domestic water service currently serving the existing development may potentially be utilized if it is of adequate size, conforms to current standards, and is in working condition as determined by the Water Inspector. If the property owner elects to utilize the existing water service, any non-conforming water service, meter, and backflow protection device shall be upgraded to conform to the current Water Division Standards. k. A separate irrigation water service and meter shall be installed per Water Division Standards. (ZSO 232) (MC 14.52) 1. Separate backflow protection devices shall be installed per Water Division Standards for domestic, irrigation and fire water services, and shall be screened from view. (Resolution 5921 and State of California Administrative Code, Title 17) m. The existing domestic water service and meter, if not being used, shall be abandoned per Water Division Standards. (ZSO 230.84) n. The fire sprinkler system that is required by the Fire Department for the proposed development shall have a separate dedicated fire service line installed per Water Division Standards. (ZSO 230.84) o. Any on-site fire hydrants that are required by the Fire Department to serve the proposed development shall become private fire hydrants that are served by private fire water services. These private fire water services shall be separated from the public water mains in Ellis Avenue by construction of a double check detector assembly. The double check detector assembly shall be constructed per the City of Huntington Beach Standard Plan No. 618, and shall be sized to provide adequate fire flow protection for the private on-site fire hydrant(s). The double check detector assembly shall be located within landscape planter area or other area and screened from view by landscaping or other method as approved by the Department of Public Works. The on-going maintenance of this private fire water service and private fire hydrants shall be the responsibility of the development owner(s). (Resolution 5921, State of California Administrative Code, Title 17) 4. The developer shall submit for approval by the Fire Department and Water Division, a hydraulic water analysis to ensure that fire service connection from the point of connection to City water main to the backflow protection device satisfies Water Division standard requirements. 5. Pursuant to the requirements of the Beach Edinger Corridor Specific Plan (BECSP), the developer shall be required to mitigate the impacts to the public sanitary sewer system resulting from the increase in flow anticipated by this project, as a result of the allowed increase in development density. Payment of an in lieu fee allows the City to implement system-wide public sanitary sewer infrastructure improvements. The amount of this in-lieu fee is $296,000, which represents a proportional fair share-payment to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on the City's public sanitary sewer system. (BECSP Mitigation Measure 4.14-2) 6. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits for projects that will result in soil disturbance of one or more acres of land,the applicant shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under the Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ) [General Construction Permit] by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State of California Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number. Projects subject to this requirement shall prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) conforming to the current National 254 8041 Ellis Avenue(PAW Code Rqints 4-25-19) Page 6 of 9 Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and acceptance. A copy of the current SWFPP shall be kept at the project site and another copy to be submitted to the City. (DAMP) 7. A Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) conforming to the current Waste Discharge Requirements Permit for the County of Orange (Order No. R8-2009-0030) [MS4 Permit] prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and acceptance. The WQMP shall address Section XII of the MS4 Permit and all current surface water quality issues. 8. The project WQMP shall include the following: a. Low Impact Development. b. Discusses regional or watershed programs (if applicable). c. Addresses Site Design BMPs(as applicable) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or "zero discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas. d. Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan. (DAMP) e. Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in the DAMP. f. Generally describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs. g. Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. h. Describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. i. Includes an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for all structural BMPs. j. After incorporating plan check comments of Public Works, three final WQMPs (signed by the owner and the Registered Civil Engineer of record) shall be submitted to Public Works for acceptance. After acceptance, two copies of the final report shall be returned to applicant for the production of a single complete electronic copy of the accepted version of the WQMP on CD media that includes: i. The 11" by 17" Site Plan in .TIFF format (400 by 400 dpi minimum). ii. The remainder of the complete WQMP in .PDF format including the signed and stamped title sheet, owner's certification sheet, Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility -sheet, appendices, attachments and all educational material. k. The applicant shall return one CD media to Public Works for the project record file. 9. Indicate the type and location of Water Quality Treatment Control Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan consistent with the Project WQMP. The WQMP shall follow the City of Huntington Beach; Project Water Quality Management Plan Preparation Guidance Manual dated June 2008. The WQMP shall be submitted with the first submittal of the Grading Plan. 10. A suitable location, as approved by the City, shall be depicted on the grading plan for the necessary trash enclosure(s). The area shall be paved with an impervious surface, designed not to allow run- on from adjoining areas, designed to divert drainage from adjoining roofs and pavements diverted around the area, and screened or walled to prevent off-site transport of trash. The trash enclosure 255 8041 Ellis Avenue(PW Code Rqmts 4-25-19) Page 7 of 9 area shall be covered or roofed with a solid, impervious material. Connection of trash area drains into the storm drain system is prohibited. if feasible, the trash enclosure area shall be connected into the sanitary sewer. (DAMP) 11. A detailed soils and geological/seismic analysis shall be prepared by a registered engineer. This analysis shall include on-site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials to provide .detailed recommendations for grading, over excavation, engineered fill, dewatering, settlement, protection of adjacent structures, chemical and fill properties, liquefaction, retaining wails, streets, and utilities. (MC 17,05,150) 12. The applicant's grading/erosion control plan shall abide by the provisions of AQMD's Rule 403 as related to fugitive dust control. (AQMD Rule 403) 13. The name and phone number of an on-site field supervisor hired by the developer shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Departments. In addition, clearly visible signs shall be posted on the perimeter of the site every 250 feet indicating who shall be contacted for information regarding this development and any construction/grading-related concerns. This contact person shall be available immediately to address any concerns or issues raised by adjacent property owners during the construction activity. He/She will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the conditions herein, specifically, grading activities,truck routes, construction hours, noise, etc. Signs shall include the applicant's contact number, regarding grading and construction activities,and"1-800-CUTSMOG" in the event there are concerns regarding fugitive dust and compliance with AQMD Rule No. 403. 14. The applicant shall notify all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the perimeter of the property of a tentative grading schedule at least 30 days prior to such grading. THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH DURING GRADING OPERATIONS: 15, An Encroachment Permit from the City Depart of Public Works is required for all work within City's rig ht-of-way. 16. The developer shall oordinate the development of a truck haul route with the Department of Public Works if the import or export of material in excess of 5000 cubic yards is required. This plan shall include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed truck haul routes. It shall specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent residents. These plans must be submitted for approval to the Department of Public Works. (MC 17.05.210) 17. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and shall be available to be used throughout the day during site grading to keep-the soil damp enough to prevent dust being raised by the operations. (California Stormwater BMP Handbook, Construction Wind Erosion WE-1) 18, All haul trucks shall arrive at the-site no earlier than 8:00 a-m. or leave the site no later than 5:00 p.m., and shall-be limited to Monday through Friday only. (MC 17,05) 19. Wet down the areas that are to be graded or that is being graded, in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. (WE-1 WC 17.05) 20. The construction disturbance area shall be kept as small as possible. (California Stormwater BMP Handbook, Construction Erosion Control EC-1) (DAMP) 21. All haul trucks shall be covered or have water applied to the exposed surface prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. (DAMP) 256 8041 Ellis Avenue(PW Code Rqmts 4-25-19) Page 8 of 9 22. Prior to leaving the site, all haul trucks shall be washed off on-site on a gravel surface to prevent dirt and dust from leaving the site and impacting public streets. (DAMP) 23. Comply with appropriate sections of AQMD Rule 403, particularly to minimize fugitive dust and noise to surrounding areas. (AQMD Rule 403) 24. Wind barriers shall be installed along the perimeter of the site. (DAMP) 25. All construction materials, wastes, grading or demolition debris and stockpiles of soils, aggregates, soil amendments, etc. shall be properly covered, stored and secured to prevent transport into surface or ground waters by wind, rain, tracking, tidal erosion or dispersion. (DAMP) THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 26. A Precise Grading Permit shall be issued. (MC 17.05) 27. The applicable Orange County Sanitation District Capital Facility Capacity Charge shall be paid to the City Department of Public Works. (Ordinance OCSD-40) THE FOLLOWING-DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: 28. Traffic Control Plans, prepared by a- Licensed Civil or Traffic Engineer, shall be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the City of Huntington Beach Construction Traffic Control Plan Preparation Guidelines and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. (Construction Traffic Control Plan Preparation Guidelines) THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION OR OCCUPANCY: 29. Complete all improvements as shown on the approved grading and improvement plans. (MC 17.05) 30. All new utilities shall be undergrounded. (MC 17.64) 31. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid at the current rate unless otherwise stated, per the Public Works Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council and available on the-city web site at http://www surfcity-hb org/f€les/users/public works/fee schedule.pdf. (ZSO 240.06/Z:SO 250,16) 32. Traffic Impact Fees (TIF) for the proposed project shall be paid prior to-building permit issuance for retail use and prior to final occupancy for the residential use. The current rate for residential condominium use is $1,364.01/unit, and for retail use is $4,175.67. The rates are subject to annual fee adjustments. (MC 17,65) 33. Prior to grading or building permit-close-out and/or the issuance of a certificate of use or a certificate of occupancy, the applicant-shall: -a. Demonstrate that all structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) described in the Project WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. b. Demonstrate all drainage courses, pipes, gutters, basins, etc. are clean and properly constructed. 257 8041 Ellis Avenue(PW Code Kgmts 4-25-19) Page 9 of 9 c. Demonstrate that applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs described in the Project WQMP. d. Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved Project WQMP are available for the future occupiers. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN: 34. The finished floor elevations indicated on the Conceptual Grading Plan are lower than the surrounding landscape planter areas and landscape swale at the northerly portion of the site. As a prudent design the swale flowline elevations should be lower than finished floor elevations to allow positive drainage away from the building foundations. 35. Section C-C shall include a cross section of the proposed underground detention basin,. including width and depth dimensions and distance from the new public right-of-way line. The proposed underground detention basin shall be located a minimum distance of 10 feet from the new public right-of-way line. 36. Section D-D indicates a swale flowline lower than the new finished floor elevation. However, the plan view above shows spot elevations of a swale (and area drain) higher than the new finished floor. 37. Section D-D indicates building setback dimension of 11 feet from the northerly property line, whereas the plan view above shows a setback dimension of 15 feet. 258 H001 e CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DATE: MAY 22, 2019 PROJECT NAME: ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS PLANNING APPLICATION NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 17-205 ENTITLEMENTS: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18-004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 18-001 DATE OF PLANS: APRIL 22, 2019 PROJECT LOCATION: 8041 ELLIS AVENUE (NORTH SIDE OF ELLIS AVENUE, EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD) PROJECT PLANNER: NICOLLE AUBE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER PLAN REVIEWER: STEVE BOGART, SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER TELEPHONEIE-MAIL: 714-374-1692/ SBOGART(a-)SURFCITY-HB.ORG PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ***UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, LANDSCAPING, HYDROLOGY, WQMP, TRAFFIC STUDY, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, AND GRADING*** REQUEST TO DEMOLISH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LIQUOR STORE,AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING CARWASH TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR-STORY, 48-UNIT -CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT WITH 891 SF OF GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL AND THREE LEVELS OF SUBTERRANEAN PARKING ON A 0.955 ACRE SITE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT: 1. The tentative tract map received and dated March 7, 2019 shall be the conditionally approved layout, including the following: a. The existing 6-foot easement(along the subject site's westerly property line)for Public Utility Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed water quality basin or the proposed basin shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. b. The existing 20-foot easement, over existing Parcels 1 and 2 (along the subject site's westerly property line) for Ingress and Egress Purposes shall be quitclaimed to eliminate any encroachment by the proposed building or the proposed building shall be relocated to eliminate any encroachments into said easement. 259 8041 Ellis Avenue—PW Suggested Conditions of Approval(4/25/19) Page 2 of 2 THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION OR OCCUPANCY: 1. The Developer shall provide a Landscape Maintenance License Agreement for the continuing maintenance and liability of all landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, furniture, and hardscape that is located along the project frontage within the public right of way. The agreement shall describe all aspects of maintenance such as enhanced sidewalk cleaning, trash cans, disposal of trash, signs, tree or palm replacement and any other aspect of maintenance that is warranted by the development plan improvements proposed. The agreement shall state that the property ownership shall be responsible for all costs associated with maintenance, repair, replacement, liability and fees imposed by the City. 2. All existing overhead utilities that occur along the project's Ellis Avenue frontage shall be under-grounded. This includes the Southern California Edison (SCE) aerial distribution lines (12kV) and poles along the entire length of the westerly frontage of the subject project. This condition also applies to all utilities, including but not limited to all telephone, electric, and Cable TV lines. If required, easements shall be quitclaimed and/or new easements granted to the corresponding utility companies. 260 FEHUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION HUNTINGTON BEACH PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CODE REQUIREMENTS DATE: May 21, 2019 PROJECT NAME: Ellis Avenue Condos PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2017-205 ENTITLEMENTS: Conditional Use Permit No.17-042 Environmental Assessment No. 18-001 Tentative Tract Map No. 18-004 DATE OF PLANS: April 22, 2019 PROJECT LOCATION: 8041 Ellis Avenue (north side of Ellis Avenue, east of Beach Boulevard) PLAN REVIEWER: Nicolle Aube, Associate Planner TELEPHONE/E-MAIL: 714-374-1529/Nicolle.Aube@surfcity-hb.org PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REQUEST TO DEMOLISH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LIQUOR STORE, AND A PORTION OF AN EXISTING CARWASH TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR-STORY, 48-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT WITH 891 SF OF GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL AND THREE LEVELS OF SUBTERRANEAN PARKING ON A 0.955 ACRE SITE The following is a list of code requirements deemed applicable to the proposed project based on plans stated above. The list is intended to assist the applicant by identifying requirements which must be satisfied during the various stages of project permitting and implementation. A list of conditions of approval adopted by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the requested entitlement(s), if any, will also be provided should final project approval be received. If you have any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Plan Reviewer. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: 1. Prior to submittal of the Final Map for processing and approval, the following shall be required: a. An Affordable Housing Agreement in accord with Section 230.14 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance.,(HBZSO Section 230.14) a. At least 90 days before City Council action on the final map, CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Community Development Department and approved by the City Attorney. The CC&Rs shall identify the common driveway access easements, and maintenance of all walls and common landscape areas by the Homeowners'Association.The CC&Rs must be in recordable form prior to recordation of the map. (HBZSO Section 253.12.1-1) 261 Page 2 of 5 b. Final tract map review fees shall be paid, pursuant to the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council. (HBZSO Section 254.16) 3. A minimum of 14 days prior to submittal for building permits, an application for address assignment, along with the corresponding application processing fee and applicable plans (as specified in the address assignment application form), shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. (City Specification No. 409) 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the final map shall be recorded with the County of Orange. (HBZSO Section 253.22) 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, a Mitigation Monitoring Fee shall be paid to the Community Development Department pursuant to the fee schedule adopted by resolution of the City Council. (City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Fee Schedule) 6. During demolition, grading, site development, and/or construction, all requirements of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code including the Noise Ordinance shall be adhered to. All activities including truck deliveries associated with construction, grading, remodeling, or repair shall be limited to Monday — Saturday, 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Such activities are prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (HBMC 8.40.090) 7. The Departments of Comm unity.Development, Public Works and Fire shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all conditions of approval herein as noted after each condition. The Community Development Director and Public Works Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the tract map are proposed during the plan check process. Permits shall not be issued until the Community Development Director and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Planning Commission's action and the conditions herein. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Planning Commission may be required pursuant to the HBZSO. (HBZSO Section 241.10) 8. Tentative Tract No. 18147 shall not become effective until the ten (10) calendar day appeal period has elapsed from Planning Commission action. (HBZSO Section 251.12) 9. Tentative Tract Map No. 18147 and Conditional Use Permit No. 16-031 shall become null and void unless exercised within two(2)years of the date of final approval.An-extension of time may be granted by the Director of Community Development pursuant to a written request submitted to the Community Development Department a minimum 60 days prior to the expiration date. (HBZSO Section 251.14 and 251.16) 10.The subdivision shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code, Building Division, and Fire Department, as well as all applicable local, State and Federal Codes, Ordinances and standards, except as noted herein. (City Charter, Article V) 11. Construction shall be limited to Monday — Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (HBMC 8.40.090) 12.The applicant shall submit a check in the amount of $2,280.75 for the posting of a Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The check shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Community Development Department within two (2)days of the Planning Commission's action. (California Code Section 15094) 262 Page 3 of 5 13. All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner, and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas,check with Community Development Department and Public Works for code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission/Zoning Administrator. (HBZSO Section 232.04) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042: The site plan, floor plans, and elevations approved by the Planning Commission shall be the conceptually approved design: a. Parking lot striping shall comply with Chapter 231 of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Title 23, California Administrative Code. (HBZSO Chapter 231) b. The site plan shall include all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to, backflow devices and Edison transformers. Utility meters shall be screened from view from public right-of-ways. Electric transformers in a required front or street side yard shall be enclosed in subsurface vaults. Backflow prevention devices shall be not be located in the front yard setback and shall be screened from view. (HBZSO Section 230.76) c. The site plan and elevations shall include the location of all gas meters, water meters, electrical panels, air conditioning units, mailboxes (as approved by the United States Postal Service), and similar items. If located on a building, they shall be architecturally integrated with the design of the building, non-obtrusive, not interfere with sidewalk areas and comply with required setbacks. (HBZSO Section 230.76) d. All parking area lighting shall be energy efficient and designed- so as not to produce glare on adjacent residential properties. Security lighting shall be provided in areas accessible to the public during nighttime hours, and such lighting shall be on a-time-dock or photo-sensor system. (HBZSO 231.18.C) e. Bicycle parking facilities shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of HBZSO Section 231.20—Bicycle Parking. (HBZSO Section 231.20)- 2. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed: a. A-Landscape and Irrigation Plan, prepared by a Licensed Landscape Architect shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. (HBZSO Section 232.04) b. "Smart irrigation controllers"and/or other innovative means to reduce the quantity of runoff shall be installed. (HBZSO Section 232.04.D) c. Standard landscape code requirements apply. (HBZSO Chapter 232) d. All landscape planting, irrigation and maintenance shall comply with the City Landscape Standards and Specifications. (HBZSO Section 232.04.BECSP 2.6.9) e. Landscaping plans should utilize native, drought-tolerant landscape materials where appropriate and feasible. (HBZSO Section 232.06.A) 263 Page 4 of 5 f. A Consulting Arborist(approved by the City Landscape Architect) shall review the final landscape tree-planting plan and approve in writing the selection and locations proposed for new trees. Said Arborist signature shall be incorporated onto the Landscape Architect's plans and shall include the Arborist's name, certificate number and the Arborist's wet signature on the final plan. (Resolution No. 4545) 3. Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed: a. A minimum of 14 days prior to submittal for building permits,an application for address assignment, along with the corresponding application processing fee and applicable plans (as specified in the address assignment application form), shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. (City Specification No. 409) 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. The Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan fee shall be paid. (Resolution No. 2010-80) b. All new commercial and industrial development and all new residential development not covered by Chapter 254 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, except for mobile home parks, shall pay a park fee, pursuant to the provisions of HBZSO Section 230.20—Payment of Park Fee. The fees shall be paid and calculated according to a schedule adopted by City Council resolution. (City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department Fee Schedule) 5. During demolition, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to: a. All Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Municipal Code requirements including the Noise Ordinance. All activities including truck deliveries associated with construction, grading, remodeling, or repair shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Such activities are prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (HBMC 8.40.090) 6. The structure(s) cannot be occupied, the final building permit(s) cannot be approved, and utifities cannot be released for the first residential unit until the following has been completed: a. A Certificate of Occupancy must be approved by the Community.Development Department. (HBMC 17.04.036) b. Signage shall be reviewed and approved under separate permits. (HBZSO Chapter 233) c. Complete all improvements as shown on the approved grading, landscape and improvement plans. (HBMC 17.05) d. All trees shall be maintained or planted in accordance to the requirements of Zoning Ordinance and Specific Plan No. 14. (HBZSO Chapter 232) e. All landscape irrigation and planting installation shall be certified to be in conformance to the City approved landscape plans by the Landscape Architect of record in written form to the City Landscape Architect. (HBZSO Section 232.04.D) f. The provisions of the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements shall be implemented. (HBMC 14.52) 264 Page 5of5 7. The use shall comply with the following: a. Outdoor storage and display of merchandise, materials, or equipment, including display of merchandise, materials, and equipment for customer pick-up, shall be subject to approval of Conditional Use Permit. (HBZSO Section 230.74) 8. The Development Services Departments (Community Development, Fire, Police, and Public Works) shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable code requirements and conditions of approval. The Director of Community Development may approve minor amendments to plans and/or conditions of approval as appropriate based on changed circumstances, new information or other relevant factors. Any proposed plan/project revisions shall be called out on the plan sets submitted for building permits. Permits shall not be issued until the Development Services Departments have reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the Community Development Director's action. If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the Director of Community Development may be required pursuant to the provisions of HBZSO Section 241.18. (HBZSO Section 241.18) 9. Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final approval, or as modified by condition of approval. An extension of time may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Community Development Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date. (HBZSO Section 241.16.A) 10. Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 shall not become effective until the appeal period following the approval of the entitlement has elapsed. ((HBZSO Section 241.14) 11. The Planning Commission reserves the right to revoke Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 pursuant to a public hearing for revocation, if any violation of the conditions of approval, Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance or Municipal Code occurs. (HBZSO Section 241.16.D) 12.The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code, Community Development Department and Fire Department, as well as applicable local, State and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards, except as noted herein. (City Charter,Article'V) 13. Construction shall be limited to Monday — Saturday 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal holidays. (HBMC 8.40.090) 14. The applicant shall submit checks in the amount of$50 for the posting of the Notice of Determination at the County of Orange Clerk's Office. The checks shall be made out to the County of Orange and submitted to the Community Development Department within two (2) days of the Community Development Director's approval of entitlements. (California Code Section 15094) 15.All landscaping shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner,and in conformance with the HBZSO. Prior to removing or replacing any landscaped areas, check with the Departments of Community Development and Public Works for Code requirements. Substantial changes may require approval by the Planning Commission. (HBZSO Section 232.04) 16.All permanent, temporary, or promotional signs shall conform to Chapter 233 of the HBZSO. Prior to installing any new signs, changing sign faces, or installing promotional signs, applicable permit(s) shall be obtained from the Community Development Department. Violations of this ordinance requirement may result in permit revocation, recovery of code enforcement costs, and removal of installed signs. (HBZSO Chapter 233 265 ATTAC H M E N T #5 City of Huntington Beach File #: 19-666 MEETING DATE: 6/11/2019 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Community Development Director BY: Nicolle Aube, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 (ELLIS AVE. CONDOS) REQUEST: To permit a one-lot subdivision and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial space and three levels of subterranean parking and find the project exempt from CEQA. LOCATION: 8041 Ellis Avenue (North side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) APPLICANT: Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture, 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine, CA 92618 PROPERTY OWNER: Tahir Salim, THDT Investment, Inc., 1307 W. 611 Street, Suite 202, Corona, CA 92882 BUSINESS OWNER: N/A STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 1. Is the project proposal consistent with the City of Huntington Beach's adopted land use regulations (i.e. General Plan, Zoning Map and Zoning Code including the Beach and Edinger City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 5 Printed on 6/6/2019 powere2 . ,Legistari1di File #: 19-666 MEETING DATE: 6/11/2019 Corridors Specific Plan)? 2. Does the project satisfy all the findings required for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit? RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission take the following action: A) Consider the suggested findings for denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 as directed by the Planning Commission on May 28, 2019. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Background: On May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the project proposal to consolidate three parcels for a one-lot condominium map and development of a 48 unit mixed-use project as described in the May 28, 2019 staff report (Attachment No. 2). The requested permits to allow such development included 1) Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and 2) Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042. The Planning Commission held a public hearing, considered public testimony, deliberated on the project and expressed concerns related to the required findings, and directed staff to return with suggested findings for denial at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled for June 11 , 2019 (Attachment No. 1). Tentative Tract Map: Per Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) Section 251.08(F), the Planning Commission shall deny approval of a tentative subdivision map if it determines that approval will result in any of the conditions as described in Government Code Section 66474. The conditions described in Government Code Section 66474 are as follows: (a) That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (b) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. (d) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement are likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (g) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. After considering public testimony the Planning Commission discussed the project and expressed concerns relating to conditions (b), (c), and (d) listed above. In particular, the Planning Commission expressed concerns that approval of the project would result in the following conditions for the reasons specified: City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 6/6/2019 powere237y Legistar l File #: 19-666 MEETING DATE: 6/11/2019 • Approval of the project would result in a design of the proposed subdivision that is not consistent with the General Plan and Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) in that the project design fails to further a number of goals and policies contained within the General Plan and BECSP. More particular detail and analysis is contained below. • Approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the type of development in that the site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of the BECSP by merging three existing lots into a single long and narrow 0.95 acre parcel. The long and narrow parcel is not physically suitable for the proposed mass, bulk, and intensity of the proposed four story mixed use project and does not complement the scale and proportion of surrounding one and two-story developments. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Ave. and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Blvd. • Approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the proposed project results in a density of approximately 50 dwelling units per acre while the adjacent residential property is built at an aggregate density of 13 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project does not further the following General Plan and BECSP goals and policies: Land Use Element Goal LU-1: New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-ID: Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Goal LU-3: Neighborhoods and attractions are connected and accessible to all residents, employees, and visitors. Policy LU-3A: Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. Policy LU-3C: Ensure connections are well maintained and safe for users. Circulation Element Goal CIRC-1c: Through ongoing evaluation of jurisdiction, efficient transportation management provides the highest level of safety, service and resources. Policy CIRC-IF: Require development projects to provide circulation improvements to achieve stated City goals and to mitigate to the maximum extent feasible traffic impacts to adjacent land uses and neighborhoods as well as vehicular conflicts related to the project. Policy CIRC - 1G: Limit driveway access points, require driveways to be wide enough to accommodate traffic flow from and to arterial roadways, and establish mechanisms to consolidate driveways where feasible and necessary to minimize impacts to the smooth, City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 6/6/2019 powereZW Legistar� File #: 19-666 MEETING DATE: 6/11/2019 efficient, and controlled flow of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The proposed lot consolidation, subdivision, design and improvement is not consistent with the above goals and policies of the General Plan or the BECSP because the infill project is not compatible in density, intensity, proportion, scale, and character with the surrounding land uses and does not complement the adjoining uses in that the proposed four story mixed use development is significantly more intense than the adjacent one-story commercial and two- story multi-family residential developments. The BECSP encourages buildings to orient towards streets and provide enhancements to the pedestrian and public experience. However, in the proposed project, approximately five percent of the building length is oriented towards Ellis Ave. while the remainder is oriented to the established residences to the east and commercial uses to the west. Further, the project architectural design and scale is not compatible with the vision of the BECSP. The adjacent properties will be impacted by the height and massing of the proposed project. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site because it is too bulky and too intense for the available land area. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the BECSP Five Points District because only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. The proposed project does not create continuity with new and existing development along the Beach Boulevard corridor because the project does not propose to augment or expand the existing bikeways. Furthermore, ingress and egress to the project site generates conflicts with the flow of traffic on Ellis Ave. There is no access or connectivity to the project site from Beach Blvd and insufficient vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. Motorists exiting the project site will be unable to safely turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. will be unable to turn left into the project site due to congestion and narrow roadway widths. Residents and visitors cannot directly access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. and must continue past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a U-Turn on Ellis Ave., resulting in inefficient vehicular movements. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave., motorists who do not abide by this restriction may create vehicular hazards and conflicts due to frequent congestion and queuing on Ellis Ave. Per Section 251.08(F) of the HBZSO if the Planning Commission determines that any of the conditions listed in Government Code Section 66474 (and listed in this staff report for reference) would result as a consequence of approval of the project, the Planning Commission shall deny approval of the tentative subdivision map. These findings are reflected in Attachment No. 1. Conditional Use Permit: Per HBZSO Section 241.10, related to required findings for conditional use permits and variances, subsection C requires the Planning Commission to deny a conditional use permit if it cannot make all of the required findings under subsection A, which are as follows: 1. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity nor detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 6/6/2019 power-26,LegiStaril File #: 19-666 MEETING DATE: 6/11/2019 2. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. 3. The proposed use will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20 through 25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. After considering public testimony the Planning Commission discussed the project and expressed concerns relating to finding 3 listed above. In particular, the Planning Commission expressed concerns that the project does not further the vision of the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the BECSP, which envisions a vibrant commercial corridor within the Five Points District of the BECSP. The proposed project is located within the Five Points District and does not further a vibrant commercial corridor because only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use, there is insufficient vehicular ingress and egress to the site, and the project proposes marginal public open space that does not contribute to the BECSP's vision of walkability and pedestrian connections between public and private property. Per Section 241.10, subsection C of the HBZSO, if the Planning Commission cannot make all of the required findings under subsection A (listed in this staff report for reference) the Planning Commission is required to deny the conditional use permit. These findings are reflected in Attachment No. 1. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Suggested Findings for Denial of TTM No. 18157 and CUP No. 17-042 2. May 28, 2019 Planning Commission Staff Report City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 6/6/2019 powereViQ aegis ar," SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: The Planning Commission finds and determines that certain conditions (b), (c) and (d) listed in Government Code Section 66474 would result as a consequence of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157, for reasons more particularly described herein: 1. Approval of the project would result in a design of the proposed subdivision that is not consistent with the General Plan and Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) in that the project design fails to further a number of goals and policies contained within the General Plan and BECSP. More particular detail and analysis is contained below. 2. Approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the type of development in that the site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of the BECSP by merging three existing lots into a single long and narrow 0.95 acre parcel. The long and narrow parcel is not physically suitable for the proposed mass, bulk, and intensity of the proposed four story mixed use project and does not complement the scale and proportion of surrounding one and two-story developments. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Ave. and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Blvd. 3. Approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the proposed project results in a density of approximately 50 dwelling units per acre while the adjacent residential property is built at an aggregate density of 13 dwelling units per acre. The design and improvement of proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 does not further the goals and policies of the General Plan or the BECSP as follows: Land Use Element Goal LU-1: New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-ID: Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Goal LU-3: Neighborhoods and attractions are connected and accessible to all residents, employees, and visitors. Policy LU-3A: Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. Policy LU-3C: Ensure connections are well maintained and safe for users. 271 Circulation Element Goal CIRC-1c. Through ongoing evaluation of jurisdiction, efficient transportation management provides the highest level of safety, service and resources. Policy CIRC-1F: Require development projects to provide circulation improvements to achieve stated City goals and to mitigate to the maximum extent feasible traffic impacts to adjacent land uses and neighborhoods as well as vehicular conflicts related to the project. Policy CIRC— 1 G: Limit driveway access points, require driveways to be wide enough to accommodate traffic flow from and to arterial roadways, and establish mechanisms to consolidate driveways where feasible and necessary to minimize impacts to the smooth, efficient, and controlled flow of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The proposed lot consolidation, subdivision, design and improvement is not consistent with the above goals and policies of the General Plan or the BECSP because the infill project is not compatible in density, intensity, proportion, scale, and character with the surrounding land uses and does not complement the adjoining uses in that the proposed four story mixed use development is significantly more intense than the adjacent one-story commercial and two-story multi-family residential developments. The BECSP encourages buildings to orient towards streets and provide enhancements to the pedestrian and public experience. However, in the proposed project, approximately five percent of the building length is oriented towards Ellis Ave. while the remainder is oriented to the established residences to the east and commercial uses to the west. Further, the project architectural design and scale is not compatible with the vision of the BECSP. The adjacent properties will be impacted by the height and massing of the proposed project. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site because it is too bulky and too intense for the available land area. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the BECSP Five Points District because only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. The proposed project does not create continuity with new and existing development along the Beach Boulevard corridor because the project does not propose to augment or expand the existing bikeways. Furthermore, ingress and egress to the project site generates conflicts with the flow of traffic on Ellis Ave. There is no access or connectivity to the project site from Beach Blvd and insufficient vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. Motorists exiting the project site will be unable to safely turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. will be unable to turn left into the project site due to congestion and narrow roadway widths. Residents and visitors cannot directly access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. and must continue past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a U- Turn on Ellis Ave., resulting in inefficient vehicular movements. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave., motorists who do not abide by this restriction may create vehicular hazards and conflicts due to frequent congestion and queuing on Ellis Ave. 272 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042: The Planning Commission finds and determines that it is unable to make all of the required findings, contained in Section 241.10(A) of the HBZSO, for reasons more particularly described below: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will not comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20 through 25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located in that the project does not further the vision of the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the BECSP, which envisions a vibrant commercial corridor within the Five Points District of the BECSP. The proposed project is located within the Five Points District and does not further a vibrant commercial corridor because only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use, there is insufficient vehicular ingress and egress to the site, and the project proposes marginal public open space that does not contribute to the BECSP's vision of walkability and pedestrian connections between public and private property 273 ATTAC H M E N T #6 Huntington Beach Planning Commission 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 NOTICE OF ACTION June 12, 2019 Jeff Herbst MCG Architecture 111 Pacifica, Suite 280 Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 181571CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17- 042 (ELLIS AVE. CONDOS) APPLICANT: Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture, 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine, CA 92618 PROPERTY OWNER: Tahir Salim, THDT Investment, Inc., 1307 W. 6th Street, Suite 202, Corona, CA 92882 REQUEST: To permit a one-lot subdivision and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial space and three levels of subterranean parking and find the project exempt from CEQA. LOCATION: 8041 Ellis Avenue (North side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) DATE OF ACTION: June 11, 2019 On Tuesday, June 11, 2019, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission took action on your application, and your application was denied with findings. Attached to this letter are the findings for denial. Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the action taken by the Planning Commission becomes final at the expiration of the appeal period. A person desiring to appeal the decision shall file a written notice of appeal to the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Planning Commission's action. The notice of appeal shall include the name and address of the appellant, the decision being appealed, and the grounds for the appeal. Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of Two Thousand, Three Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars ($2,353.00) if the appeal is filed by a single family dwelling property owner appealing the decision on his own property and Three Thousand, Seven Hundred Seventy-Eight Dollars ($3,778.00) if the appeal is filed by any other party. In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing fee is Friday, June 21, 2019, at 5:00 PM. Phone 714-536-5271 Fax 714-374-1540 www.surfcity-hb.org Notice of Action:1TM 18157 and CLIP 17-042 June 11,2019 Page 2 Excepting those actions commenced pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, you are hereby notified that you have 90 days to protest the imposition of the fees described in this Notice of Action. If you fail to file a written protest regarding any of the fees contained in this Notice, you will be legally barred from later challenging such action pursuant to Govemment Code §66020. If you have any questions regarding this Notice of Action letter or the processing of your application, please contact Nicolle Aube, the project planner, at (714) 374-1529 or via email at nicolle.aube@surfcity-hb.org, or the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271. Sincerely, Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Secretary Planning Commission By: At Jane James' Planning Manager ULR:JJ:NA:kdc Attachment: Findings For Denial —TTM 18157 and CUP 17-042 c: Honorable Mayor and City Council Chair and Planning Commission Dave Kiff, City Manager Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development Dave McBride, Division Chief/Fire Marshal Mike Vigliotta, Chief Assistant City Attorney Debbie DeBow, Principal Civil Engineer Eric Haghani, Building Manager Nicolle Aube, Associate Planner Property Owner Project File 275 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL -TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157: The Planning Commission finds and determines that certain conditions (b), (c) and (d) listed in Government Code Section 66474 would result as a consequence of approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157, for reasons more particularly described herein: 1. Approval of the project would result in a design of the proposed subdivision that is not consistent with the General Plan and Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) in that the project design fails to further a number of goals and policies contained within the General Plan and BECSP. More particular detail and analysis is contained below. 2. Approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the type of development in that the site will not function as an integrated development compatible with the vision of the BECSP by merging three existing lots into a single long and narrow 0.95 acre parcel. The long and narrow parcel is not physically suitable for the proposed mass, bulk, and intensity of the proposed four story mixed use project and does not complement the scale and proportion of surrounding one and two-story developments. The project will generate conflicts with vehicular circulation on Ellis Ave. and there will be no connectivity for bicyclists to continue onto Beach Blvd. 3. Approval of the project would result in a site that is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development in that the proposed project results in a density of approximately 50 dwelling units per acre while the adjacent residential property is built at an aggregate density of 13 dwelling units per acre. The design and improvement of proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 does not further the goals and policies of the General Plan or the BECSP as follows: Land Use Element Goa! LU-1: New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-1 C: Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-ID: Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. G:\PC\NOA\19\061119TTM18157—CUP17-042 (Eiiis Condos) Attachment 1.1 276 Policy LU-2B: Ensure that new and renovated structures and building architecture and site design are context-sensitive, creative, complementary of the city's beach culture, and compatible with surrounding development and public spaces. Goal LU-3: Neighborhoods and attractions are connected and accessible to all residents, employees, and visitors. Policy LU-3A: Ensure that future development and reuse projects are consistent with the Land Use Map to provide connections between existing neighborhoods and city attractions. Policy LU-3C: Ensure connections are well maintained and safe for users. Policy LU-12B: Encourage renovation and revitalization of deteriorating and struggling nonresidential areas and corridors, particularly commercial locations. Circulation Element Goal CIRC-1 c. Through ongoing evaluation of jurisdiction, efficient transportation management provides the highest level of safety, service and resources. Policy CIRC-1 F. Require development projects to provide circulation improvements to achieve stated City goals and to mitigate to the maximum extent feasible traffic impacts to adjacent land uses and neighborhoods as well as vehicular conflicts related to the project. Policy CIRC — 1G: Limit driveway access points, require driveways to be wide enough to accommodate traffic flow from and to arterial roadways, and establish mechanisms to consolidate driveways where feasible and necessary to minimize impacts to the smooth, efficient, and controlled flow of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The proposed lot consolidation, subdivision, design and improvement is not consistent with the above goals and policies of the General Plan or the BECSP because the infill project is not compatible in density, intensity, proportion, scale, and character with the surrounding land uses and does not complement the adjoining uses in that the proposed four story mixed use development is significantly more intense than the adjacent one- story commercial and two-story multi-family residential developments. The BECSP encourages buildings to orient towards streets and provide enhancements to the pedestrian and public experience. However, in the proposed project, approximately five percent of the building length is oriented towards Ellis Ave. while the remainder is oriented to the established residences to the east and commercial uses to the west. Further, the project architectural design and scale is not compatible with the vision of the BECSP. The adjacent properties will be impacted by the height and massing of the proposed project. The length and height of the proposed building is not compatible with the long, narrow characteristics of the 0.95 acre site because it is too bulky and too intense for the available land area. The project does not support the vibrant commercial corridor envisioned in the BECSP Five Points District because only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use. GAMNOXIM61119 TfM 18157_CUP 17-042 (Ellis Condos) Attachment 1.2 277 The proposed project does not create continuity with new and existing development along the Beach Boulevard corridor because the project does not propose to augment or expand the existing bikeways. Furthermore, ingress and egress to the project site generates conflicts with the flow of traffic on Ellis Ave. There is no access or connectivity to the project site from Beach Blvd and insufficient vehicular access is provided via a single driveway along Ellis Avenue. Motorists exiting the project site will be unable to safely turn left onto Ellis Ave. from the driveway and motorists entering the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. will be unable to turn left into the project site due to congestion and narrow roadway widths. Residents and visitors cannot directly access the project site from eastbound Ellis Ave. and must continue past the project to Patterson Ln. to make a U-Turn on Ellis Ave., resulting in inefficient vehicular movements. Additionally, even though motorists will be required to exit the project via a right hand turn onto Ellis Ave., motorists who do not abide by this restriction may create vehicular hazards and conflicts due to frequent congestion and queuing on Ellis Ave. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042: The Planning Commission finds and determines that it is unable to make all of the required findings, contained in Section 241.10(A) of the HBZSO, for reasons more particularly described below: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 for the development of a mixed-use building consisting of 48 condominium residences and 891 sf. of retail space will not comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20 through 25 and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located in that the project does not further the vision of the Town Center Neighborhood Segment of the BECSP, which envisions a vibrant commercial corridor within the Five Points District of the BECSP. The proposed project is located within the Five Points District and does not further a vibrant commercial corridor because only one and a half percent (1.5%) of the total square footage of the project is allocated to commercial use, there is insufficient vehicular ingress and egress to the site, and the project proposes marginal public open space that does not contribute to the BECSP's vision of walkability and pedestrian connections between public and private property G:\PCINOA11 91061 1 1 9 TTM 18157_CUP 17-042 (Ellis Condos) Attachment 1.3 278 ATTAC H M E N T #7 ity of Huntington Beach ° 2000 Main Street * Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 41 wvvivhuntingtonbeachca.gov fF817 teas;a ® Office of the City Clerk ® Robin Estanislau, City Clerk NOTICE OF APPEAL OF PLANNING COMNUSSION ACTION ON JUNE 11,2019 TO: Project Planner Community Development Director DATE: June 20, 2019 City Attorney City Manager City Council Public Works Director FILED BY: THDT Investment, Inc. Tahir Salim 1307 West 6"' Street, Ste. 202 Corona CA 92882 (951) 893-1900 REGARDING: Appeal of Action taken by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2019 to Deny Tentative Tract Map No. 18157; Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042. Copy of Appeal Letter attached. Robin Estanislau, City Clerk X5227 Fee Collected: $3,778.00 Sister Cities: Anje, Japan Waitakere, New Zealand 279 Before the City of Huntington Beach City Council In re: ) Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 ) Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 ) Notice of Appeal $3,778 Filing Fee Project: EIlis Avenue Condominiums ) } Project Location: 8041 Ellis Avenue ) Appeal from Action of the Planning Commision Denying Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Submitted to: City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Phone: (714) 53 6-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Appellant: THDT Investment, Inc. ..� Attn: Tahir Salim - 1307 West 6th Street Suite 202 Corona, CA 92882 y i 951-893-1900 � After June 30, 2019: 4740 Green River Road Suite 304 Corona, CA 92880 Appeal fivin Denial Action of the 00,of Huntington Beach Planning Cormnission-2019-06-12 Page I of 5 280 Introduction THDT Investment, Inc. (the "Applicant"), appeals from the action of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission (the "PIanning Commission"), denying Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (the "Denial Action"). The Denial Action occurred at the Planning Commission's Regular Meeting, held on June 11, 2019. Applicable Rules This appeal is governed, in significant part, by the Zoning and Subdivision Code of the City of Huntington Beach (the "Zoning Code"). The Zoning Code, in pertinent part provides as follows: A. Timing. "The time for appeal from a decision by ... the Planning Commission shall be filed within 10 calendar days after the date of the decision." Section 248.16. B. City Council to Hear Appeal. "The City Council shall hear an appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission. The decision of the City Council is final ...." Section 248.18. C. Notice of Appeal. "A person desiring to appeal a decision shall file a written notice of appeal ...; an appeal to the Planning Commission's decision shall be filed with the City Clerk." Section 248.20A. D. Form of Notice. "The notice of appeal shall contain the name and address of the person appealing the action, the decision appealed fi-om and the grounds for the appeal." Section 248.20B. E. Action by City Clerk on Appeal. "The ... City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the reviewing body and shall give notice of the hearing on the appeal in the time and manner set forth in Sections 248.02 and 248.04." Section 248.20C. F. City Council Review. "The reviewing body shall hear the appeal as a new matter. The original applicant has the burden of proof. The reviewing body may act upon the application, either granting it, conditionally granting it or denying it, irrespective of the precise grounds or scope of the appeal. In addition to considering the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing on the appeal, the reviewing body shall consider all pertinent information from the file as a result of the previous hearings from which the appeal is taken." Section 248.20D. "The reviewing body may reverse or affirm in whole or in part, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination that is being appealed." Section 248.20E. Statement of the Matter 1. On or about March 7, 2019, the Applicant submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 and Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 associated with a request tlppeal fiom Denial Action of 1he City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission-2019-0642 Page 2 of 5 281 to demolish a liquor store and constrict a 4-story mixed use development (48 condominium units and 891 sf of retail space) with three levels of subterranean parking on a 0.955 acre site (the "Project"). 2. Prior to submitting its application, the Applicant devoted substantial time, effort, thought and expense in acquiring the subject property and developing the Project as proposed. After receiving the initial comments based on the entitlement submittal on November 1, 2017, the applicant and their consultants began extensive correspondence back and forth with planning staff to obtain compliance with the Beach Edinger Specific Plan. The applicant met in person with city staff on at least four separate occasions, again to further align the project with the specific plan. The entitlement exhibits were submitted and subsequently reviewed by city staff a minimum of five separate occasions. All of the documents were scrutinized by planning staff and thus providing the applicant with a draft list of conditions on May 22, 2019 stating that planning staff felt the project was in compliance with the Beach Edinger Specific Plan (BECSP). Further stating that the proposed mixed use development "will be compatible with surrounding developments in terns of architectural design and scale pursuant to the massing and scale requirements of the BECSP". The conditions also stated "the project will result in less than significant impacts related to traffic, noise, lighting, aesthetics, and privacy of adjacent residences". 3. On or about March 7, 2019, various divisions of the City of Huntington Beach issued Project Implementation Code Requirements and conditions for approval in connection with the Project, including the Fire Department Fire Prevention staff, the Public Works Department, the Planning and Building Department, and the Police Department. 4. On or about April 1, 2019, City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development issued a Notice of Filing Status, indicating that the Applicant's application was complete, accepted for processing, and scheduled for review with the Planning Commission. The Notice listed a number of items to resolve in advance of the public hearing. 5. On May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission considered the Project at its regularly scheduled hearing, pursuant to notice. At the hearing, the commissioners discussed the Project, and a few of the commissioners began to express a general sentiment that, although the Project fully complied with the code requirements, the Project seemed unacceptable. The commissioners struggled to articulate the bases for their views and asked the Planning Department staff to provide bases for denial of the Project. The Planning Department staff reminded the commissioners that it was their responsibility to articulate the bases for denial of the Project, whereupon the commissioners began to endeavor to articulate bases for denial. The commissioners thereupon asked the Planning Department staff to compile the bases as articulated by the commissioners as suggested findings for denial of the Project at the hearing on June 11, 2019. G. At the regularly scheduled hearing of the Planning Commission on June 11, 2019, the Planning Commission considered the suggested findings for denial. A representative of the Applicant was permitted to speak and expressed the Applicant's view that substantial money, Appeal fi• in Denial Action of the CRY ofHmaington Beach Planning Commission-2019-06-12. Page 3 of 5 282 } effort, time and thought went into developing a Project that fully complied with all requirements of the Zoning Code only to have the Project rejected at the final hearing stage on the basis of considerations expressed by the commissioners that seemed subjective and difficult to articulate. The representative indicated that the rejection seemed akin to the famous historical moment when Emperor Joseph 11 said to Mozart, following the premier of"The Marriage of Figaro," that the work. had "too many notes."' The representative stated that developers will be reluctant to develop real estate in the City of Huntington Beach if they can't know whether compliance with the Zoning Code would be enough, given the need to satisfy the additional, subjective concerns of the commissioners. After further discussion regarding the Project, the Planning Commission voted to deny the Project. Only the Chairman of the Plarming Commission voted in favor of the Project, expressing his view that the bases propounded by the other commissioners in opposition to the Project were too subjective. 7. The Applicant accordingly filed this appeal. 8. The City Council should reverse the Denial Action of the Planning Commission and approve the Project. The City Council can conform any reasonable stated bases for denial of the Project as expressed by the Planning Commission into conditions of approval that must be cleared before the Project progresses. There simply is no reasonable basis to deny the Project outright as the Planning Commission did. 9. The Project is an important development for the City of Huntington Beach. The Project replaces a liquor store, vacant land and a portion of a car wash. The Project provides 48 new condominium residences and 891 sf of commercial space on the North side of Ellis Avenue, between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Lane. The Project will also provide for 5 affordable housing units as part of the overall 48 which the city will benefit from as part of state mandated compliance. The Project provides for enhanced parking beyond what the city code requires which will allow the development to sustain its own demands and not create spill over parking onto adjacent properties as has been experienced on some other projects. The smaller footprint and enhanced contemporary architecture of the Project will provide a substantial benefit to the community by improving an otherwise blighted plot of land which has been subject to many instances of vagrants and homeless people loitering on the property. While the buildings overall mass is four floors the upper most floor is substantially reduced in its setback fi•om the street and width in relation to the overall building to reduce its impact on adjacent properties. 10. There is substantial evidence to support the City Council's action to approve the Project. The Project fully complies with the objective standards expressed in the Zoning Code. Moreover, the Project goes beyond the minimum standards to provide for both public and private open spaces well exceeding those base levels. The Project complies with the land use goals and policies including density, consolidation of parcels and provides a range of housing to meet the needs of the city. Further the fact that all of the parking is sub-grade will substantially reduce the potential solar heat gain as is typical for grade level parking lots. We believe that, because the 1 In the movie, Amadeus, the Emperor further states: "Cut a few [of the notes] and it will be perfect"--to which Mozart aptly replies: "Which few did you have in mind, Majesty?" The inquiry highlights the frustration of talented persons in trying to respond to and satisfy capricious standards. Appeal front Denial Action of the City of Hantingion Beach Planning Commission-2019-06-12 Page 4 of 5 283 City Council's approval of the Project is supported by substantial evidence, its decision would not be contested by any party and would otherwise be upheld on any appeal. See Kutzke a City ofSan Diego(4th Dist. 2017), 11 Cal,App.5th 1034. For these reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests that the City Council reverse the action taken by the Planning Commission and approve the Project. Respectfully submitted, Tapir Salim President Appeat fivin Denial Action of the City ofHunfington Beach Planning Commission-2019--06-12 Page 5 of 5 284 Appeal front Denial Action of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission-2019-06-12 Page S of 5 285 i lk Of Al rdop y lot k v 4 � ,, a --� •� � ��. � -- rr a wt Iwo mom le, V J' f a s ., o r e t �E e +m 1 � � j r o oo U O s a ILa gym. u 5 r p' w. r � v i v I M Ttt, 6 may. 289 a 1� _ r /f At Ar dIp = - r 4 r , _ F IGI „�.� '_'-�� � ��: Ifs+fit • LL arr x or do i Of lilt AL M n ..m F c �r a.. a a s C, x ... August 1 -3� cc �p'm. sy^'4Ile x '4 d , a- o- r= September � -3�J � ��m�• _ s u s a. e / y.1 .w� r 'S 1 4� IL rs ._ I ow a I 1� ,k Y f .' i94. tier a r t i.A + w . - .. G , _w 3 a� m 4 ": Huntington Beach, California 92648 June L 7 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the "Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, I Tc,�Wry I nv� 298 fq� t� CEO wlf� �N C44 _q Huntington Beach, California 92648 June Le, 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the "Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, • 1 rn.(u' P�t�� 299 r 1'4uk)7� To Huntington Beach, California 92648 June_L, 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the"Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Pen-nit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. 1 believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, 300 Huntington Beach, California 92648 June 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the"Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, ZVI 2-5 C� Q_ yCA Z,( 301 ---' C OV, Huntington Beach, California 92648 Junel3 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the"Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, r' 302 L s w u r aa- vao SwyJJ'` 9 1 ,eFirfl rAil (yam ••f f. PI('! • �5 r M :"R r. . _ lte.. VIA t Ilk rl d M1 a ' ,z4 s y �- !' +; - yr► C �*. ��q���,�- ' s. • . 1. �ir ,*' iI. �' •a� 1'a. �� /( r 1 W"fir x f .. t� i t y�� , N r � .'i t l is � d _,,�. �."'•� `.r� � /�!� �'��--'!4•c r�{/' i, � •-, ' Jam" �„ ?.i tS' ,. �` �' +`„ r mr frr a• a ne r 210 S F ND. 0 4955 AC 1, .. ' OCCUPANCY: P-27M CONSTRUCTION TYPE 111-A e BUILDING- 60.511 S.F. i i FLOOR AREA: y uwry ..r>w BTREETLEVEL SECOND LEVEL 15,5705E 3 �1y1 I wrt.„ wrx wpA eln. wren leers+ wrn I t7,478 SF THIRD LEVEL 17,4TO SF ROOF DECK LEVEL a,010 SF `I TOTAL FLOOR AREA 57.3208E PARKING AREA: Id rT r41n eoow r „r r \rw vrn aoo. as semenm n I PARKING LEVEL 1 20,751 SF PARKING LEVEL 2 20,751 SF PARKING LEVEL O 10,794 SF 4 ___ ___—_ __ ___ TOTAL PARKING AREA 64.298 SF NUMBER OF UNITS STREET IEVEZ 12 UNITS 2ND T I I I I I I I 03RD LEVEL 29 UNITS ROOF DECK LEVEL 7 UNITS TOTAL UNITS 40 UNITS 1 UA B C 0 E F G H I AMU-AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT,4.8-UNITS REQUIRED.DEVELOPER WILL BE PROVIDING 5 UNITS. 2 ND FLOOR PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 7157,IN SOOK 157,PAGE•OF ORANGE COUNTYASSESSORSOFNCE. \\ A OWNER THDT INVESTMENTS F� y 1197 W.6TN ST.M2 e \ CORONA CA 92662 w \ 951 543 a665 • N v MRx SALIMTHEONEQYANOO.COM np _ __ T �w�_ reorleTl WC.w¢a F rnaLrnN eNCueMwMm \ II .. NT F! 6 . �� �.'� �� 4-- �� UxIry 11•. T� ice~ \ M GLARCHITECTUREIJEFF H—T w _#�____ _y__.m 111 PALIFICA,Rag IRVINE.CA a25+a 9 I Nk}h^ n r Q+tl \..�ia rt, 1 949.SS � ua rF wr'ra w to VKn r. 7 \ 1 JHERSST*St�MCOARCHITECN0.E LOM 1117 loss 1 -__ ___ w 3 /� 1 -7r I. L'_Gw '7'�\ L l Rye as Q s � M4•- , M.n r,w.an Row i \ �� uxnrol I' w N w u:aam s rw rw„ry e.r woe nAw wT w x Gewewn cacc"rI.-.w..19 J e.w r orvla meKxos -_—__-- STREET LEVEL ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS SITE PLAN& AGG J09.: ��o; FIRST&SECOND FLOOR PLANS HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA A-2 DATE REVI01oN3 • Ill Pacifica,Sutte290 OMWI9 RLVIMPERI2. !IIOOMMENT9 Scale. 1-2(70' 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 9v1a19 avoDMMENrsrNSlaN " W vne,Cellteme9261B 047K+9 D'AKM.DFAINS_ tram z HUNTINGTON BEACH.CA 92648 55At1+9 fENOEDAFA73TasrouL_ o la 2a Ka R)949.553.1117 1'949'474.7059 •woxoMrwessM/.G I49KI.a59PeFp .. r90pardilecture,com M�n►�b,b,w m,Ywwnr.W'...ueM w .FI-rw F�wV N-w'xwsw W 4nr.rm.n.� ATTAC H M E N T #8 Aube, Nicolle From: James, Jane Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 1:11 PM To: Luna-Reynosa, Ursula; Villasenor, Jennifer; Aube, Nicolle Subject: FW: 0 MyHB-#175843 City Council [06637] FYI Jane James I Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 714.536.5596 1 Names@surfcity-hb.org From: Esparza, Patty<PEsparza@surfcity-hb.org> Sent: Wednesday,July 24, 2019 12:58 PM To:James,Jane<jjames@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: FW:R MyHB-#175843 City Council [06637] Communication received on the Ellis Ave. condo project being appealed. Patty Esparza, C?ViC Assistant City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5260 From: MyHB<reply@mycivicapps.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 24, 2019 11:10 AM To: Estanislau, Robin <Robin.Estanislau@surfcity-hb.org>; Switzer, Donna <Donna.Switzer@surfcity-hb.org>; Esparza, Patty<PEsparza@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:R MyHB-#175843 City Council [06637] MyHB Issue Type/Subtype Changed -#175843 Workorder#175843 issue type changed from City Council to Agenda & Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Status Change issue type Work Order #175843 Issue Type City Council 1 307 Subtype All Council Members Staff Member(s) Robin Estanislau,Donna Switzer,Patty Esparza Notes Mayor and City Council Members, I am urging you to deny the appeal of the Developers of Ellis Ave. Condos.Your Planning Commission denied their request to build these condos after a lengthy discussion of the many reasons this building is not a good fit nor intended to fit with the BECP. I am sure you are aware of the many issues why the Planning Commission denied their request. Issues such as entry and exit of the apartments, the shade study which the developers presented was found to be completely flawed, the "coffee shop"which does not fit with the intent of the BECP,just too big of a building for such a small narrow space. I could go on, but I think you are all aware of how this project is NOT a good fit for this area. In the event you have not driven down Ellis in the morning or afternoon, give it a try during "rush hour". Quite often westbound traffic is backed up to Goodwin Ln and sometimes as far back as Chapel Ln.To throw in an apartment entrance and exit on Ellis would do nothing but increase this traffic and subject the area to more accidents by people trying to make a U turn on Ellis to come back and make the "right turn only" entrance into this proposed building. As a long time resident of Huntington Beach, this is not a good idea. As I mentioned earlier, your Planning Commission denied the project by a 6-1 vote. I am asking you to deny the Developers appeal of this project.Thank you, Steve Farnsworth 18401 Goodwin Ln. Huntington Beach CA 92646 View the Report Reporter Name Steve Farnsworth Email hazmn54(c-)pmail.com Phone 714-975-1038 Report Submitted JUL 23, 2019 -5:01 PM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Please do not change subject line when responding. 2 308 California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund 126o Mission St San Francisco, CA 94103 CaRLA. hi@carlaef.org 7/19/2019 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Robin Estanislau, City Clerk, Robin.Estanislau@surfcity-hb.org; Erik Peterson, Mayor, erik.peterson@surfcity hb.org; Lyn Semeta, Mayor Pro Tempore, Lyn.Semeta@surfcity-hb.org; Patrick Brenden, Council Member, Patrick.Brenden@surfcity-hb.org; Kim Carr, Council Member, Kim.Carr@ surfcity hb.org; Barbara Delgleize, Council Member, Barbara.delgleize@surfcity-hb.org; fill Hardy, Council Member, jill.hardy@surfcity-hb.org; Mike Posey, Council Member, mike.posey@ surfcity-hb.org; Via Email Re: 8041 Ellis Avenue Case No. 19-545 Dear Huntington Beach City Council Members, The California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund (CaRLA) submits this letter to inform you that the Huntington Beach City Council has an obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the above captioned proposal, including the Housing Accountability Act. California Government Code § 65589.5, the Housing Accountability Act, prohibits localities from denying housing development projects that are compliant with the locality's Zoning Ordinance and General Plan at the time the application was deemed complete, unless the locality can make findings that the proposed housing development would be a threat to public health and safety. The most relevant section is copied below: (j) When a proposed housing development project complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria, including design review standards, in effect at the time that the housing development project's application is determined to be complete, but the local agency proposes to disapprove the project or to approve it upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density, the local agency shall base its decision regarding 309 the proposed housing development project upon written findings supported by substantial evidence on the record that both of the following conditions exist: (1) The housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless the project is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density. As used in this paragraph, a "specific, adverse impact" means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. (2) There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1), other than the disapproval of the housing development project or the approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a lower density. The Applicant proposes to construct a 48-unit, 4-story mixed use building on a 0.95 acre site within the Beach and Edinger Corridor Specific Plan (SP 14). The above captioned proposal is zoning compliant and general plan compliant, therefore, your local agency must approve the application, or else make findings to the effect that the proposed project would have an adverse impact on public health and safety, as described above. In their denial of the project, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission failed to provide objective criteria that the project violates. Instead the Planning Commission made subjective assertions about the project's conformity with the Specific Plan (SP 14) that do not constitute valid conditions for denial and contradict the actual content of the Specific Plan. CaRLA is a 501(03 non-profit corporation whose mission is to restore a legal environment in which California builds housing equal to its needs, which we pursue through public impact litigation and providing educational programs to California city officials and their staff. Sincerely, Sonja Trauss Co-Executive Director California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund - hi@carlaef.org 126o Mission St, San Francisco, CA 94103 310 California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund - hi@carlaef.org 126o Mission St, San Francisco, CA 94103 311 Aube, Nicolle From: Lisa Kemp<lisakemp@verizon.net> Sent: Saturday,August 10, 2019 9:05 PM To: Aube, Nicolle Subject: Beach Ellis condonproject I would like to voice my opposition to another high density complex up for reconsideration at Beach and Ellis,The planning commission has already recommended against this development.The people have also already spoken against it.The city counsel is there for the people of the city, not special interest groups. Lisa Kemp 221 22nd St Sent from my iPhone 1 312 Aube, Nicolle From: Kathleen Brown <heykathybrown@g mail.com> Sent: Sunday,August 11, 2019 12:54 AM To: Aube, Nicolle Subject: HDD Please continue to prevent High Density Development in our fair city,specifically the Ellis one that should be DEAD already! Thank you, Kathleen Brown Sent from my Whone 1 313 Aube, Nicolle From: Jeannie Bird <seabird214@!cloud.com> Sent: Sunday,August 11, 2019 7:32 AM To: Aube, Nicolle Subject: STOP the Ellis Ave Project ! ! ! ! Please DO NOT build this project! Huntington Beach is already adversely impacted by the obnoxious high density apartment complexes(think Bella Terra area-Gothard/Edinger/Center). Traffic all over town is already bad enough. Adding 48 condos in a tight area is beyond ridiculous! The City Council must be in bed with these greedy developers. Disgraceful! Jeanne&Michael Bird 4371 Waimea Drive HB 92649 1 314 ATTAC H M E N T #9 Aube, Nicolle From: Tahir Salim <salimtheone@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 2:53 PM To: Aube, Nicolle Cc: Scott Yorkison Subject: Continuance of the meeting Nicole, Based on our conversation regarding 2 members being absent on the 19th, please move my hearing date to the September 3rd. Please confirm my email. Thanks Tahir i 315 i CASH RECEIPT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O. BOX 711 ' FB,11,190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648-0711 www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/payments DATE fAiP Issuing Dept. �%TING, OFF ree.o*reoyd � f "/ v Dept. Phone# 7, 9 FUNDS RECEIVED FROM Q cF�oUN7Y GP�� ADDRESS .3, ..1,. - Phone#: City of Huntington Beach FOR )ate: 6/20/2019 Cashi er:caseye r T .g d. ,r� , - 44 Tice: CITVH Tran #:48 i ,� �� ff `" y y y 3tch: 1868 AMOUNT RECEIVED O Cash (,Check# Credit Card Z. ------------------ Prep ared - Received Finance 'ter Cash Receipts g x <,.� , , ?';'� By Approval )ipt #: 00412456 IF OBJECT= 50006THRU 90000, FINANCE APPROVAL REQUIRED Approval Date t #: Business Unit Ob ect I Subs I Sub-Ledger I T pe Payment Total : $3,778.00 / . P _ �eJ..�2�?/- — — — — — — —— — — ----------------------- • ----- ' -- • - - - - - -- - '- Transaction Total : $3,778.00 Check Tendered $3,778.00 ———— ———— - ————— - -- - - - — — — ——— -- — ————— - ————— - -- —— — ——— .— Please Visit us on the web www:surfcity-hb,org — — ——— — -- — — — -- ———— ——— — J /�' X -7 6; CQ Stamped Validation Only TOTAL p Please do not write in the box below l a7a:j 145-o-ox I,Q I No. 1320305 ISSUING DEPARTMENT COPY City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ♦ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ♦ www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Office of the City Clerk Robin Estanislau, City Clerk NOTICE OF APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON DUNE 11,2019 TO: Project Planner Community Development Director DATE: June 20, 2019 City Attorney City Manager City Council Public Works Director FILED BY: THDT Investment, Inc. Tahir Salim 1307 West 6" Street, Ste. 202 Corona CA 92882 (951) 893-1900 REGARDING: Appeal of Action taken by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2019 to Deny Tentative Tract Map No. 18157; Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042. Copy of Appeal Letter attached. & Robin Estanislau, City Clerk X5227 Fee Collected: $3,778.00 Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan ♦ Waitakere, New Zealand Before the City of Huntington Beach City Council In re: ) Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 ) Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 ) } Notice of Appeal } $3,778 Filing Fee Project: Ellis Avenue Condominiums ) Project Location: 8041 Ellis Avenue ) s Appeal from Action of the Planning Commision Denying Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Submitted to: City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Appellant: THDT Investment, Inc. Attn: Tahir Salim _ 1307 West 6th Street 4 C. `--- Suite 202 i Corona, CA 92882 CD 951-893-1900 ' _ r, r After June 30, 2019: 4740 Green River Road Suite 304 Corona, CA 92880 Appeal fibin Denial Action:of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Conanission-2019-06-12 Page I of 5 Introduction THDT Investment, Inc. (the "Applicant"), appeals from the action of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission (the "Planning Commission"), denying Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 (the "Denial Action"). The Denial Action occurred at the Planning Commission's Regular Meeting, held on June 11, 2019. Applicable Rules This appeal is governed, in significant part, by the Zoning and Subdivision Code of the City of Huntington Beach (the "Zoning Code"). The Zoning Code, in pertinent part provides as follows: A. Timing. "The time for appeal from a decision by ... the Planning Commission shall be filed within 10 calendar days after the date of the decision." Section 248.16. B. City Council to Hear Appeal. "The City Council shall hear an appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission. The decision of the City Council is final ...." Section 248.18. C. Notice of Appeal. "A person desiring to appeal a decision shall file a written notice of appeal ...; an appeal to the Planning Commission's decision shall be filed with the City Clerk." Section 248.20A. D. Form of Notice. "The notice of appeal shall contain the name and address of the person appealing the action, the decision appealed from and the grounds for the appeal." Section 248.20B. E. Action by City Clerk on Appeal. "The ... City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the reviewing body and shall give notice of the hearing on the appeal in the time and manner set forth in Sections 248.02 and 248.04." Section 248.20C. F. City Council Review. "The reviewing body shall hear the appeal as a new matter. The original applicant has the burden of proof. The reviewing body may act upon the application, either granting it, conditionally granting it or denying it, irrespective of the precise grounds or scope of the appeal. In addition to considering the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing on the appeal, the reviewing body shall consider all pertinent information from the file as a result of the previous hearings from which the appeal is taken." Section 248.20D. "The reviewing body may reverse or affirm in whole or in part, or may modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination that is being appealed." Section 248.20E. Statement of the Matter 1. On or about March 7, 2019, the Applicant submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 and Tentative Tract Map No. 18157 associated with a request Appeal firnn Decrial fiction of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission-2019-06-12 Page 2 of 5 , to demolish a liquor store and construct a 4-story mixed use development (48 condominium units and 891 sf of retail space) with three levels of subterranean parking on a 0.955 acre site (the "Project"). 2. Prior to submitting its application, the Applicant devoted substantial time, effort, thought and expense in acquiring the subject property and developing the Project as proposed. After receiving the initial comments based on the entitlement submittal on November 1, 2017, the applicant and their consultants began extensive correspondence back and forth with planning staff to obtain compliance with the Beach Edinger Specific Plan. The applicant met in person with city staff on at least four separate occasions, again to further align the project with the specific plan. The entitlement exhibits were submitted and subsequently reviewed by city staff a minimum of five separate occasions. All of the documents were scrutinized by planning staff and thus providing the applicant with a draft list of conditions on May 22, 2019 stating that planning staff felt the project was in compliance with the Beach Edinger Specific Plan (BECSP). Further stating that the proposed mixed use development "will be compatible with surrounding developments in terms of architectural design and scale pursuant to the massing and scale requirements of the BECSP". The conditions also stated "the project will result in less than significant impacts related to traffic, noise, lighting, aesthetics, and privacy of adjacent residences". 3. On or about March 7, 2019, various divisions of the City of Huntington Beach issued Project Implementation Code Requirements and conditions for approval in connection with the Project, including the Fire Department Fire Prevention staff, the Public Works Department, the Planning and Building Department, and the Police Department. 4. On or about April 1, 2019, City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development issued a Notice of Filing Status, indicating that the Applicant's application was complete, accepted for processing, and scheduled for review with the Planning Commission. The Notice listed a number of items to resolve in advance of the public hearing. 5. On May 28, 2019, the Planning Commission considered the Project at its regularly scheduled hearing, pursuant to notice. At the hearing, the commissioners discussed the Project, and a few of the commissioners began to express a general sentiment that, although the Project fully complied with the code requirements, the Project seemed unacceptable. The commissioners struggled to articulate the bases for their views and asked the Planning Department staff to provide bases for denial of the Project. The Planning Department staff reminded the commissioners that it was their responsibility to articulate the bases for denial of the Project, whereupon the commissioners began to endeavor to articulate bases for denial. The commissioners thereupon asked the Planning Department staff to compile the bases as articulated by the commissioners as suggested findings for denial of the Project at the hearing on June 11, 2019. 6. At the regularly scheduled hearing of the Planning Commission on June 11, 2019, the Planning Commission considered the suggested findings for denial. A representative of the Applicant was permitted to speak and expressed the Applicant's view that substantial money, Appeal front Denial Action of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission-2019-06-12 Page 3 of 5 effort, time and thought went into developing a Project that fully complied with all requirements of the Zoning Code only to have the Project rejected at the final hearing stage on the basis of considerations expressed by the commissioners that seemed subjective and difficult to articulate. The representative indicated that the rejection seemed akin to the famous historical moment when Emperor Joseph 11 said to Mozart, following the premier of"The Marriage of Figaro," that the work had "too many notes."' The representative stated that developers will be reluctant to develop real estate in the City of Huntington Beach if they can't know whether compliance with the Zoning Code would be enough, given the need to satisfy the additional, subjective concerns of the commissioners. After further discussion regarding the Project, the Planning Commission voted to deny the Project. Only the Chairman of the Planning Commission voted in favor of the Project, expressing his view that the bases propounded by the other commissioners in opposition to the Project were too subjective. 7. The Applicant accordingly filed this appeal. 8. The City Council should reverse the Denial Action of the Planning Commission and approve the Project. The City Council can conform any reasonable stated bases for denial of the Project as expressed by the Planning Commission into conditions of approval that must be cleared before the Project progresses. There simply is no reasonable basis to deny the Project outright as the Planning Commission did. 9. The Project is an important development for the City of Huntington Beach. The Project replaces a liquor store, vacant land and a portion of a car wash. The Project provides 48 new condominium residences and 891 sf of commercial space on the North side of Ellis Avenue, between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Lane. The Project will also provide for 5 affordable housing units as part of the overall 48 which the city will benefit from as part of state mandated compliance. The Project provides for enhanced parking beyond what the city code requires which will allow the development to sustain its own demands and not create spill over parking onto adjacent properties as has been experienced on some other projects. The smaller footprint and enhanced contemporary architecture of the Project will provide a substantial benefit to the community by improving an otherwise blighted plot of land which has been subject to many instances of vagrants and homeless people loitering on the property. While the buildings overall mass is four floors the upper most floor is substantially reduced in its setback from the street and width in relation to the overall building to reduce its impact on adjacent properties. 10. There is substantial evidence to support the City Council's action to approve the Project. The Project fully complies with the objective standards expressed in the Zoning Code. Moreover, the Project goes beyond the minimum standards to provide for both public and private open spaces well exceeding those base levels. The Project complies with the land use goals and policies including density, consolidation of parcels and provides a range of housing to meet the needs of the city. Further the fact that all of the parking is sub-grade will substantially reduce the potential solar heat gain as is typical for grade level parking lots. We believe that, because the 1 In the movie, Amadetes, the Emperor further states: "Cut a few [of the notes] and it will be perfect"--to which Mozart aptly replies: "Which few did you have in mind, Majesty?" The inquiry highlights the frustration of talented persons in trying to respond to and satisfy capricious standards. Appeal j»nt Denial Action of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Conauission-2019-06-12 Page 4 of S City Council's approval of the Project is supported by substantial evidence, its decision would not be contested by any party and would otherwise be upheld on any appeal. See Kutzke a City of Sate Diego (4th Dist. 2017), 11 Cal.App.5th 1034. For these reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests that the City Council reverse the action taken by the Planning Commission and approve the Project. Respectfully submitted, da,4L,S�- Tahir Salim President Appeal finne Denial Action of the City ofHunlington Beach Planning Commission-2019-06-12 Page 5 of 5 p. COOP- I" Appeal from Denial Action of the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission-2019-06-12 Page 5 of 5 AVk `L�pm. i' � y _ ( l M � lb 4L a ,.� dop I e ./ 4rf Aa, .n "00W � ► f x tSL z 1 r t - . eft ` � �`' �• #' '�"..'�'. .'�� �-' 1}' ' ,t w , t f 7 r .r April 1 —30 4prr�. AW AV I n a w. n took. moo s4 �� ' May 1 -31 <<%� � • rrm. n Adik AMP- s T. t FAt _ June 1 -30 �•:� 4prii. rp 4 • 41 NEWSAj � a ,� ,E low { -� Ar r - AW 4 At s July 1 -31 '�% �p'�• - AV -40b :. ,AM rrw _ x .,.. s �I '� F August 1 -�� � �p�• x W n_ a a- r r z r fF f a INL— a> / 4 _ JIM "' sr i n t q m m November l -�� ra�a� p .3 �4 m -I-Pwpw-Apr- Y y e.-ve,[ CA_VI �, Huntington Beach, California 92648 June �72019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 4 �t- 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 CAW rove Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the "Project") Prp 1 eC +— 8041 Ellis Avenue J Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, i 1 c� �� a Huntington Beach, California 92648 June L 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the"Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, qw<-L �_ r-?,lA4n, 1 uuk) n�Tv ��� C66� 4Z, �2_ Huntington Beach, California 92648 June L, 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the"Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, ��(e-54_l II DD__ Huntington Beach, California 92648 June JS 2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the"Project") 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, ZaVlAe, "­T�a 9 -`1 t 5 Z SZD a� c � A CC Huntington Beach, California 92648 June L�2019 City of Huntington Beach City Clerk Office Attn: City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA Phone: (714) 536-5227 Fax: (714) 374-1557 Re: Ellis Avenue Condominium Project(the"Project') 8041 Ellis Avenue Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042 Dear City Council Members: I am a resident of Huntington Beach, situated at the address noted above, and as you can see from my address, I live near the proposed Project. I have been shown the site plan for the Project, blueprints for this Project, a rendering of the Project and some of the considerations of the developer in developing this Project. I also have been informed that the Planning Commission denied the Project, citing various considerations, and I know that the developer is planning to appeal that denial to the City Council for further review. Considering this information, and knowing that you will be considering the Project on appeal, I want to let you know that I favor the Project. I believe that it will improve the neighborhood and hopefully the property values as well. I believe that the City Council can impose reasonable conditions as necessary to resolve any of the concerns of the Planning Commission. I hope that you take such action as will be necessary to approve the Project so that the developer can proceed. Thank-you so much for giving me the opportunity to provide this information to you. Sincerely, Ir- •.��/ - bcr. ter' ..r �. �w {_.. 4.q.`µ.�ti.?J � ,� '$y'..l'"� ro'. y,,' ,a: I� ��' - i y,p� 'N^•�/' s. {j .sue "�� • y -� 1 L, r IA fa�M l VVI a .. � � 1 r' y 1 t. 3 m . ,' I. ... �,'"•Ti-. -�. +� Y - .^z�;.'-, �.+.'" ..•ice. I \ y��y Y•t' 3 r` MOM 5S e t";i Jy .Alm ,4-S1761, Ap � k ^• t \ - t R e �z fir' .s .h wd 1 x, r Y 1 � C , CU�� r ti ,�Y�` f }�,i tea, .. .� ii. �. " ,./',, c'`L a r�•�h� � c, .�, �i±��jr+,,,,�. � Y tom,�, xr-e er.r era rrr ara tla•L err e74P LAND: 0.955 AC 41,210S.F. — — ' OCCUPANCY: R-2/M _ I — Pnon_UNE:.az'n' CONSTRUCTION TYPE: III-A ----r--- ----I�-- ��------�+-- §mot---- ---�— q BUILDING: 88.511 S.F. rr a FLOOR AREA: a u-xH UNIT ZI —TxK MT. ELEv UNIT UNITZN NIT zP enlasE STREET LEVEL 15,578 SF §, NI NI LoseY ¢I SECOND LEVEL 17,470 SF 81 SI - sTARs I THIRD LEVEL 17,470 SF & ROOF DECK LEVEL 6,810 SF 2 § HALL— IuuwpY nl TOTAL FLOOR AREA 57,328 SF 9 PARKINGAREA: 4 "NESS WAR. ROOM uNrtu ul+rt ze INJR zc UNrt xo TnASH CHurE RPors �-, unrt zP uMT SG I PARKING LEVEL 26,751 SF EU FOR TENANTS eR'DOE PATH PARKING LEVEL 26,751 SF I}{I- M.PER FLOOR PARKING LEVEL 3 10,794 SF TOTAL PARKING AREA 64.298 SF I I I I I I I I I NUMBER OF UNITS I I I I I I I I STREET LEVEL 12 UNITS 2ND TO 3RD LEVEL 29 UNITS ROOF DECK LEVEL 7 UNITS ---I--- ----�--- PRGPERTV LIRE�.T----I-----�-------- xa zr.r zrr er-r z IN enr err era TOTAL UNITS 48 UNITS 171.1- G H I •AHU=AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT.4.8-UNITS \) REQUIRED.DEVELOPER WILL BE PROVIDING 5 UNITS. 2 ND FLOOR PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 7157,IN BOOK 157,PAGE 34 OF ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE. \\ A OWNER THDT INVESTMENTS a 1 1307 W.6TH ST.8202 CORONA,CA 92882 951.54]8665 IN)FIRE PROPOSED WATER, SCREENED AREA FOR LADDER PAD \ HYDRANT NEW RAILINGS ix'MAX. LOCATION AT \i _ __ _---_ SEWER d GAS LINES ABOVE FINISHED GRADE GGNDENSORS, PROPERTY LINE x ATTG' METERB d WS RESCUE OPENw0.4 /�\ \� ��- —— APPLICANT UTILITY AREA \ § J \ MCG ARCHITECTURE/JEFF HERBST ff8S_7:0411= �_________ so- - ------ --' 111 PACIFICA/280 IRVINE,CA 92618 3 3 949.553.1117 SP.L� I° • § xM34F UNIT IF UIJIT IO UNIT Its uNrt 1J 9 BEN �E�V uNrr lK UNIT IL PwIIF / UNR Its 1 I JHERBSTCMCGARCHITECTURE.COM zea STAIRS 4 _ _w ILoeev I 1 N , I FIREST PWE § q Toff IA DWLIEu ,� § • / C Pn LUUDy Ty,.PP,. —1.xe Y P \ _______ S�wpr ________ '� — SIRE L/ HAuwav ___H _ _ NT I OLTERNA LU SSE I qQ F CN BUOy� EM SA[MOO PER <<<<y OSCE «x y - 9.. MOLT PURPOSE ADD f ^\ L 1 _ _ RE CODE SEC PER Q O PIANS;Al.O R Etl'SP�° UNR IA UI1T,B MULTI PURPOSE ROOM f .� \\ / UNIT IC UNR11) tE ' b DESK3N € I' 7 REFUSE/ �.L \L / / J RECYCLE r \\5 A I 8 LL/ PROPOSED nAM={STAW _/FlRE TRUCK DCONCRETE ATBIGD ____ 1Mrxne H� L J Arm ¢ J J I =1 ,T tO HIGH DECORATIVE I ACCESS W/.Z HIGH MIJ(. NOP INQALLOWED TUFNASOT w.rAon a 1 I o' Si uGHi.M TO MATCH IEI A q A-ESSS 2.'a WIDE DRIVEWAY ALONG FIRE—111. —GOVM A FIXTURES ACROSS E SAVE IRE TRUCXACCESSDOWNRAMPI {/✓ a PROPOSED ELFC LADDER PA TION AT RESCUE 1 R O RASED-PORK-CHOP'STTLE �SERNCE MED-BARRIER OPENINGS HEWDRIVEAPPROACH- y11,(I� C��r SEE CINLPLANS -- ----------------- -- __ PROPERTY LINE.n3--- — ----- — / ✓ 1 _ 1 EXISTING POWER 1tl M1OM CMU WALL , H/gp. RO-S GAMGE DOOR 6 GPOLE SHALL BE RECESSEDA HIGH NED ED MIN.OF tr FROM FACE SrtE UGIRING.e' OF WALL HIGH � A STREET LEVEL ELLIS AVENUE CONDOS SITE PLAN & DATE: 35 17 0 FIRST&SECOND FLOOR PLANS HUNTINGTON BEACH CA A-2 MCG JOB N: n.35s01 . 1 DATE REVISIONS 03/04/19 REVISED PER I2-26-16 COMMENTS Scale 1 =20-0 8041 ELLIS AVENUE 111 Pacrfica,Suite 280 04/16/19 CITY COMMENTS REVISION Irvine,California 92618 0472919 REVISED#OF AHUS z HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648 T 949.553.1117 F 949,474.7056 05/01/19 REVISED AHUS TO 5 TOTAL 0 10' 2' 40 ®MCG ARCHITECTS xtllx ALL RIGHTS RESERVED mcgarc dectun:.com NOTE TNIP iMonn. I.PP pP l In Plum aM N.NbI.M W .A—. P.PeIRe AInNF,wmraool,.m a:Rl.Tm L v,o Go..IRR,.Rw Aa.R�'wP�Pr.m NDw.I..Im««cuva,maa CASH RECEIPT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH P.O. BOX 711 FFB „ ,9ag,aa HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648-0711 www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/payments DATE Q Issuing Dept. l C r Dept. Phone# ]/� _=06—5-2 Z- / FUNDS RECEIVED FROM TG/-7jf— S4//m7—j-/ j(ljVe " /rh7'„ N��151NGT0 ADDRESS 13 P ` .26 O 1`Y. Phone#: cF�ouNncs�``o FOR >l Yi 1� rn Q1I � "-ZUjC? : enTaw r,MA # (W 'CLP 17 v LIZ AMOUNT RECEIVED O Cash Check# o?.� O Credit Card $3 ' $,vU City of Huntington Beach Prepar Received Finance Date: 6/20/2019 Cashier:caseye By By Approval Office: CITYH Tran #:48 IF OBJECT= 50000 THRU 90000, FINANCE APPROVAL REQUIRED Approval Date Batch: 1868 Business Unit Object Subs I Sub-Ledger IType Cash Receipts / 0 2 Sj.5_ . ____———_ '— Receipt #: 00412456 Acct #: _ —— _ ____ — Payment Total: $3,778.00 — ——————— • ———— — • —— • —— •- -------------------- Transaction Total : $3,778.00 • Check Tendered $3,778.00 -------- ----- - -------- - t Please visit us on the web --- _ _--- . ---__ . -- . ---_____ .— www,surfcity-hb.org - -———— — — -- ———— — / -- -- — --- -- -- — TOTAL , Stamped Validation Only Please do not write in the box below No. 132 0305 ISSUING DEPARTMENT COPY 8/19/2019 County Gothard Property and Research & Technology Zoning City of Huntington Beach City Council Public Hearing August Zg, 2019 County Gothard Property & Research and Technology (RT) Zoning 1. General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. Zg-oo1 and 2. Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 18-oo1; Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 18-002 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION WAV Date. Agenda hem No., 1 8/19/2019 GPA 19-001 — County Gothard Property To amend the General Plan land use designation of a 2.26- acre vacant parcel from current Open Space—Park (OS-P)to Research and Technology(RT) OS-P RT (PS)RT 111-071-37 oS-P RT RT RT ZMA 18-001 Research and Technology (RT) Zoning 2017 General Plan Update • Created RT Land Use Designation ZMA to be consistent with General Plan Amend the Zoning Map designation in two existing industrial areas From Industrial General (IG), Industrial Limited (IL), and Commercial General(CG) To Research and Technology(RT) 2 8/19/2019 40 ZMA 18-001 � L i 1 Hhu,Nkl� YljjIyy�� I �i _ nrvhs- F I RT.HT YYMIM,K � - ■ j� ;`= ® , • ZTA 18-002 Research and Technology (RT) Zoning Amend three chapters of HBZSO to establish land use controls and development standards for the RT land use designation: 1. Chapter zoo(Use Classifications) 2. Chapter 21.2 (Industrial Districts) 3. Chapter 231(Off-Street Parking and Loading) 3 8/19/2019 Research & Technology (RT) Zoning Objectives • Establish flexible development standards • Create opportunity for property & business owners • Minimize impacts to existing businesses, property owners & surrounding neighborhoods • Attract, retain, modernize & expand local businesses • Expand how both commercial uses and pure industrial uses can utilize interior space Research & Technology (RT) Zoning Stakeholder Outreach Broker's Briefing • Stakeholder Interviews Property Owner Notification City Website - Major Projects & FAQ Y 4 8/19/2019 Research & Technology (RT) Zoning Analysis Market Study Technical Background Analysis Physical Setting Regulatory Setting Case Studies Parking -Infrastructure • ZTA 18-002 i. Chapter 204 (Use Classifications) Section 204.12 Industrial Use Classifications 4 Establish two new Use Classifications RT Flex Space • Cultivate local businesses from start-up through full operation • Retain industrial,manufacturing,and warehouse base • Permit variety of non-industrial uses that support industrial operations Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing Formalize a growing land use 5 8/19/2019 ZTA 18-002 2. Chapter 212 (Industrial Districts) • Increase allowable by-right office space from io%to 3o% • Establish Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing requirements • Permit RT Flex uses by-right Performance Standards to minimize impacts to adjacent and surrounding uses • Additional minor code revisions and corrections to facilitate recommended RT standards Update automobile storage provisions ZTA 18-002 2. Chapter 212 (Industrial Districts) Auto Storage in RT Zoning Districts (Proposed) • CUP to ZA, however • within 300 feet of Residential CUP to PC • Staff recommends No CUP for publically owned properties • Planning Commission disagrees; recommends CUP process 6 8/19/2019 ZTA 18-002 2. Chapter zit (Industrial Districts) Section 2s2.o6 Development Standards ' Establish min. lot area and lot width ' Incorporate same min. setback, max. height, & min. site landscaping as IG zone Identify max. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as s.o Identify Performance Standards for Industrial Districts ZTA 18-002 3 Chapter z31 (Off-Street Parking and Loading) Identify max. 3o% office area in RT District; and Identify office space parking requirement as i space per 250 sq. ft. of office when >30% office • 7 8/19/2019 Companion Topics Planning Commission Recommendations: • Direct Staff to Update to City's Urban Design Guidelines Establish a Broadband &Wireless Ad-Hoc Committee to Further study of Wi-Fi, Broadband, and Fiber Optic Infrastructure Direct Staff to Return with a Policy to Implement Pedestrian Sidewalks • Recommendation Approval of: • General Plan Amendment No. 19-ooi • Zoning MapAmendment No. 18-001; and • Zoning Text Amendment No. 18-002 As recommended by staff to exempt auto storage uses on publicly owned property from CUP process Provide direction on Companion Topics • 8 8/19/2019 • Questions? • Bolsa Ave. McFadden Ave. Edin erAve i 9 no uuuiuui/T.R-i ' t��_..I.... � f Nmauouni�i�� ,.ram in- u nnuu- — .,.I�I.NI.IINf111m111 Y� �!^j///� — iim I% ..... - nuns.•. r7 .� IruN. f /ii� aNiiiiii� — �II. f Inl. %f I,��.. MN.rw NIII .wnnr.uv.IIp 11 I f N"nw L.. 11■I��I� 9!!�•%% %��� -i n.n.111.■■ ��✓ 1� S�lauinr r°�=41u OnNN111 IIN it �~'— :�:���r♦ a.N11nq.��.,. 1.Ow.MO... aa, r .iiis:••'� 7!! iG n� � r� _� wnlf��L�,��p �!C• I so- ■ i iiii L '•�� C!• .1"rr r is it .■1 ' m11 +m !Im■n. r y •�mnn� nay .rwruuN _ V m •1�i'Oi--N1n ll L AdO /UIllt111r�9rnnmul �,�N�. � _ aAtc,,,,: aid ri MOK _ ///�%'' � ■nn nun, �.� .. _� rir riri/r ■ununu11 p �/.�riri/ �■��+""■111lIIIIf111�S ////U•C - I 71ten nmu I I, Cson nu ■ n 19R!111111 CR �— plus �a VIOOrSPf�n' G I)c.- \►Ifl fO. ` �I ��71111 !n� ummJ f �r 'S!p �•\! 1111111 rn■■ ii r 'rid♦�i]' �/r�r �•�"�' � � nnln NNE■ ���3ra/ y:lt �:�fh=I `4 L 1/11%� ■s.! - �yi +G/: �tO�Mf1 �Lininu�i ^BI• �,d c:�:. -� ��,'� !-_fir--_'-�=1�� 1 HARLEY ROUDA COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND 48TH DISTRICT,CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE SUBCOMMITTEE ON H16RWAY5 AND TRANSIT WASHINGTON OFFICE SUBcoMMITTEE ON WATER REsmRCEs 2300 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE Bu1Law AND ENVIRONMENT WASHINGTON.DC 20515 (202)225-2415 COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM SUBCOWMTTEE ON ENVIRONMENT,CNAMMAN DISMICT OFFICE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY 4000 E4)N ( LACE�PHONE: 71 )86D-b8 Comm of the Mnteb Otateg bouge of -Repregentatibeg Ift9bington, IDC 20515 August 15.2019 Erik Peterson, Mayor Lyn Semeta,Mayor Pro Tern SUPPLEMENTAL Patrick Brenden,Councilmember COMMUNICATION Kim Carr, Councilmember Barbara Delgleize, Councilmember _ Jill Hardy, Councilmember MeAng DeW:�� L�� Mike Posey, Councilmember p Huntington Beach City Hall Agenda hem No.; a �� 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 RE: Broadband, Wireless, and Transportation Infrastructure Technology Ad-Hoc Committee Dear Mayor Peterson and Members of the Huntington Beach City Council: As we work to bring cities into the 2 1" Century, the need to support a variety of applications,ensure increased coverage and bandwidth,and address capacity concerns place demands on existing infrastructure and signal the need to shift to forward-thinking solutions. Increasing our understanding of how cities can augment, advance, and implement smart broadband, wireless, and transportation infrastructure will encourage economic growth and help local businesses expand. In considering the future of work,enhanced communications infrastructure, including fiber-optic infrastructure, present technologically advanced solutions to modern day challenges. As a member of Congress, I am focused on common-sense, bipartisan solutions that serve the interests of California's 48"congressional district. Advancing high-speed broadband network technologies to ensure the connectivity of homes, businesses, and essential services in our coxmnunities is among my priorities. Once deployed, fiber optic infrastructure is a cost-efficient way to keep pace with the exponential demands and consumption of the various connection points and services present in the everyday lives of Americans. With centuries of innovation and advancement behind us, America is no stranger to a challenge;transitioning our infrastructure to ensure greater connectivity and access is an important step in the right direction. ROUDA.HOUSE.GOV 09>.. I appreciate the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council's continued work to advance forward-thinking approaches to infrastructure, including the recommendation for the formation of an ad hoc committee to review policy and outline goals for broadband,technology, and transportation improvements in the City. Efforts to study relevant proposals and think holistically about the future of business,communication, and work reflect a much-needed emphasis on technological advancements that will ensure that Huntington Beach and Orange County remain places for economic opportunity and prosperity. These views help inform my work as a member of Congress, and I welcome opportunities to engage on issues and work toward meaningful solutions to infrastructure challenges alongside the City of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Harley Rouda Member of C ngress 2 Work Order: #182130 0Opened: 8 17/2019 Closed: 8/19 201 9 This isstle is resolved Est. Resolution Date: Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Email SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Comment,8-19-19 Council meeting,re Gothard Property&Research and Technology Zoning I support the concept of R&T zoning to allow for more flexibility in the types of businesses operating in HB.I also commend the Planning Commission for its attention to auto-storage zoning,and therefore support the provisions in Attachment#6-Planning Commission Recommendation for Auto Storage.Further,I support creation of a Broadband and Wireless Ad-Hoc Committee.Sincerely,Dan Jamieson Huntington Beach Status Changed:08/19/2019 7:41 AM Donna Switzer Work Order*182130 status has changed from new to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Medng Date: V/ 'V I I Agenda llem No.,• Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 7:44 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Support Broadband, Wireless and Transportation Infrastructure Technology Ad Hoc Committee Attachments: (SIGNED) Letter - HB City Council for Broadband, Wireless, and Transportation Infrastructure Technology Ad-Hoc Committee.pdf AGENDA COMMENT From: Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 10:39 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Support Broadband, Wireless and Transportation Infrastructure Technology Ad Hoc Committee Mayor and City Council, I will be speaking Monday night supporting our unanimous Planning Commission vote to form a City Council Ad Hoc Committee to have the City study an "all of the above" approach to technology in Huntington Beach. I believe that our recommendation is not duplicative of the internal process for the City's Government Broadband Master Plan and/or Wireless Master Plan as those deal with City facilities and don't look at the myriad of other topics that the Planning Commission recommended this Ad Hoc Committee pursue. The concurrent City process would only be a piece of what the Committee could be looking into. This Committee could be used to help identify and create policies, and thus unify disjointed endeavors through multiple departments. We need the City Council's leadership to have the City Manager's Office take charge and create new policies for Broadband, Wireless and Transportation Infrastructure to keep Huntington Beach competitive with our neighbors. I also received a letter of support from Congressman Harley Rouda that is attached. Thank you for your consideration - I believe this Ad Hoc Committee is a great start to understanding the policies that Huntington Beach needs to become a 21st Century City. P.S. I would request that Council vote on the R&T Zone and the minute action recommendations of the Planning Commission separately so that those with recusals might be able to have input on the creation of this Committee. Dan Kalmick, Past Chair Huntington Beach Planning Commission Dan.Kalmick(&surfcity-hb.org SUPPLEMENTAL 397-3635 COMMUNICATION Ong Date: ill p 1 Agenda Kam No..; l q— 0 / i HARLEY ROUDA COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND 4$TH DISTRICT,CALIFORNIA Y.Ecn' INFRASTRUCTURE SUBCOMMITTEE oN HIGHWAYS AND TRANSIT WASHMTON OFFICE SUBCOMMITTEE ON WATER RESOURCES 2300 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT WASHMIGTON.DC 20515 (202)225.2415 COMMITTEE ON OVERSKIRT AND REFORM SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT,CHAPMAN Dw'iu Omm SUBCOMMITTEE oN NATIONAL SECURITY 4000 WesIE PLACE Congrroo of the Eniteb Otate# NEWPORT BEACH,ACH, 9266 CA 82680 PROW(714)9W-6483 gouge of Repregentatibeg Wagbington, IDC 20515 August 15, 2019 Erik Peterson, Mayor Lyn Semeta, Mayor Pro Tern Patrick Brenden,Councilmember Kim Carr,Councilmember Barbara Delgleize, Councilmember Jill Hardy, Councilmember Mike Posey, Councilmember Huntington Beach City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 RE: Broadband, Wireless, and Transportation Infrastructure Technology Ad-Hoc Committee Dear Mayor Peterson and Members of the Huntington Beach City Council: As we work to bring cities into the 21''Century, the need to support a variety of applications,ensure increased coverage and bandwidth,and address capacity concerns place demands on existing infrastructure and signal the need to shift to forward-thinking solutions. Increasing our understanding of how cities can augment, advance, and implement smart broadband, wireless,and transportation infrastructure will encourage economic growth and help local businesses expand. In considering the future of work, enhanced communications infrastructure, including fiber-optic infrastructure, present technologically advanced solutions to modern day challenges. As a member of Congress, I am focused on common-sense, bipartisan solutions that serve the interests of California's 48')'congressional district.Advancing high-speed broadband network technologies to ensure the connectivity of homes, businesses,and essential services in our communities is among my priorities. Once deployed, fiber optic infrastructure is a cost-efficient way to keep pace with the exponential demands and consumption of the various connection points and services present in the everyday lives of Americans. With centuries of innovation and advancement behind us,America is no stranger to a challenge;transitioning our infrastructure to ensure greater connectivity and access is an important step in the right direction. ROUDA.HOUSE.GOV Qew.. I appreciate the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council's continued work to advance forward-thinking approaches to infrastructure, including the recommendation for the formation of an ad hoc committee to review policy and outline goals for broadband,technology, and transportation improvements in the City. Efforts to study relevant proposals and think holistically about the future of business, communication, and work reflect a much-needed emphasis on technological advancements that will ensure that Huntington Beach and Orange County remain places for economic opportunity and prosperity. These views help inform my work as a member of Congress, and I welcome opportunities to engage on issues and work toward meaningful solutions to infrastructure challenges alongside the City of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Harley Rouda Member of C ngress 2 Work Order: #182391 Opened: Closed:08/19 201 9 This isstle is resolved Est. Resolution D. Not Yet Set Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By Patricia Smith Email patricia.smith@juno.co in SUB TYPE Phone City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Agenda hem No.:— / ( /�— kUS) - COMMENTS&ADDITIONAL NOTES Hello.I am writing to ask you to support the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee on Broadband, Wireless and Transportation Technology recommended by the Planning Commission.The Ad Hoc Committee will bring order to the mish mash approach the city seems to be taking.What is needed is serious investigation into city needs,prioritization of those needs and financing and pursuing of the highest prioritized issues.Thank you. Status Changed:08/19/2019 11:46 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#182391 status has changed from referred to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Support Worker:08/19/2019 11:32 AM Antonia Graham Workorder*182391 has been assigned to Patty Esparza Share with Citizen:NO Status Changed:08/19/2019 11:32 AM Antonia Graham Work Order*182391 status has changed from new to referred. Share with Citizen:YES Assigned Worker:08/19/2019 11:32 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182391 has been assigned to Robin Estanislau. Share with Citizen:NO Issue Type/Subtype Changed:08/19/2019 11:32 AM Antonia Graham Workorder#182391 Issue type changed from City Council to Agenda&Public Hearing Comments and subtype City Council Meeting. Share with Citizen:NO Work Order: #182946 Opened: Closed:08//21201 9 Date:This ISSLIe is i-esolved Est. Resolution Agenda & Public Hearing Comments By jay howard Email jhoward250@aol.com SUB TYPE Phone 714-261-9922 City Council Meeting Device STREET ADDRESS Media Submitted None ❑x COMMENTS &ADDITIONAL NOTES Apartments at Beach and Ellis.I urge you to vote NO for this project.I live on Hartlund and Magic.All overflow traffic cuts thru our tract and speeds there now.The lot the building is designated for is not level so when done the project will exceed the allotted 4 stories casting an even greater shadow on the current residents.Without a second entry and exit the project just doesn't work from a traffic and safety point of view.I understand that Sacramento says to build however,when we strip away all the politics and just look at this project in it's most simple form,it is being forced into a small space.Please continue to stand up for what is right for Huntington Beach as our spokespersons and reject this project. Status Changed:08/21/2019 7:45 AM Donna Switzer Work Order#182946 status has changed from new to resolved. Thank you for sharing your concerns.Your email will be included as a Supplemental Communication to this City Council agenda item. Share with Citizen:YES Em a i I ; jV3C)h NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ;NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 19, 2019, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items- 1. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 181571CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-042 Applicant: Jeff Herbst, MCG Architecture, 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine CA 92618 Appellant: Tahir Salim, THDT Investment, 4740 Green River Road, Suite 304, Corona, CA 92880 Request: To demolish an existing liquor store, residence, and portion of a former car wash to permit a one- lot subdivision and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial space and three levels of subterranean parking. Location: 8041 E"lis Avenue Beach Boulevard (North side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) City Contact: Nicolle Aube, Associate Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, because the project is within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan for which Program EIR No. 08-008 was adopted and implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EIR for the BECSP. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to nterested parties at the City Clerk's Office or on line at http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov on Thursday, August 15, 2019. Ai__ INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Robin Estanislau, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ Moore, Tania From: David Ward <daward@scng.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 31, 2019 12:30 PM To: Switzer, Donna Cc: Moore, Tania Subject: Re: Notice of Public Hearing Good afternoon Donna. Your notice is all set and ready to go. Also per your request, I'm going to ignore the other notice. Have a great day. Ad#11298908 Run Date 8/1 Cost $213 PROOF 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 19, 2019, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: F TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 1815ZtCQNDJT10NAL USE PERMIT NO. 17-U2 Applicants Jeff Herbst, MCG Archi- tecture 111 Pacifica, Suite 280, Irvine CA 92618 Am 119nt: Tahir Salim, YHDT Investment, 4740 Green River Road, Suite 304, Coro- na, CA 92880 Request: To demolish an existing liquor store, resi- dence, and portion of a former car wash to permit a one-lot subdivi- sion and development of a four-story mixed-use building including 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial s ace and three levels of subterranean parkin . Location: 8041 Ellis Avenue Beach Boulevard (_ oath side of Ellis Ave., between Beach Blvd. and Patterson Ln.) ClItY ContOcts Nicol le Aube, Asso- ciate Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is exempt from the provi- sions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, because the project is within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan for which Program E I R No. 08-008 was adopted and implementation of the project would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final EI R for the BECSP. ON F I LE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, Cali- fornia 92648 for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office or on line at http:/Iwww.huntingtonbeachca.gov on Thursday, August 15, 2019. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and ex Tess opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written cor- respondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further qquestions please call the Community Devel- opment Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Robin Estanislau, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http:/Jhuntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ Published: The Huntington Beach Wave August 8, 201911298908 2 David Ward Legal Advertising Rep 2190 S. Towne Centre PI. Anaheim, CA 92806 714-796-6764 daward@scng.com PLEASE NOTE THE E-MAIL ADDRESS HAS CHANGED SHUTHEnn CALIFOnnin NEWS GROUP On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:27 AM Switzer, Donna<Donna.Switzer(&surfcity-hb.org> wrote: Hi David, Please publish the attached Notice of Public Hearing one time, on August 8, 2019. Dawn, t/Sw&ber Deputy City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714)374-1649 Donna.Switzerksurfcity-hb.org 3 PROOF OF SERVICE OF PAPERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.6, on August 8, 2019, 1 served the foregoing documents described as: Notice of Public Hearing Before the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach — "Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of Tentative Tract Map No. 18157/Conditional Use Permit No. 17-042"on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: 819 Addresses —see label list a. [X] BY MAIL -- I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Huntington Beach, California. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business, with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of a party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in the affidavit. b. [ ] BY MAIL -- By depositing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at Huntington Beach, California, addressed to the address shown above. c. [ ] BY DELIVERY BY HAND to the office of the addressee. d. [ ] BY PERSONAL DELIVERY to the person(s) named above. e. [ ] BY FAX TRANSMISSION to No. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 8, 2019, at Huntington Beach, California. Deputy City Clerk g:/followup/letters/proof of mailing.doc • fr f •. • • I. .ice P.• it I .� 157-341-01 157-341-03 157-341-04 Vanags Eduard Ivars E I Living Raju Patel Hb Ellis Llc 207 San Clemente Ln 5292 Duke Dr Po Box 3293 Placentia, Ca 92870-6217 La Palma,Ca 90623-1774 Visalia, Ca 93278-3293 157-341-05 157-341-11 157-341-12 P A Poon &Son Inc Scarfone Family Trust Santana-Rodriguez Investment P 18862 Beach Blvd 103 18441 Patterson Ln 4546 Oceanridge Dr Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2020 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1677 Huntington Beach, Ca 92649-6-424 157-341-13 157-341-14. 157-341-15 Anthony & Kelly Dien Tamio Kaneko Alexander Karimi 10263 Oriole Ave 6561 Vesper Cir 18391 Patterson Ln Fountain Valley, Ca 92708-7423 Huntington Beach,Ca 92647-2950 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1600 157-341-16 157-341-17 157-341-19 Jerry Houchen Marie Smekal Chunghorng Richard Liu &Wang Hsing 7451 Warner Ave E-321 8902 Crescent Dr Po Box 3882 Huntington Beach,Ca 92647-5494 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-2206 West Lafayette, In 47996-3882 157-341-20 157-341-21 157-342-01 Christopher Jeffries Orange County Water District Melanie Hays 8411 Furman Ave Po Box 8300 17220 Newhope St 224 Westminster, Ca 92683-7644 Fountain Valley, Ca 92728-8300 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708-4288 157-342-02 157-342-03 157-342-04 Stephen Knight Fawzi & Rebheih Abdelfattah Gerald Kan &Marsha Tashiro 18342 Patterson Ln H1 18826 Academy Cir 9751 La Esperanza Ave Huntington-Beach,Ca 92646-1679 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1514 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708-3556 157-342-05 157-343-01 157-343-02 Lorin Jones Leo Schulz Ag & Kg Llc 5723 Elaine Ct- 2305 England St B Po Box 547-92 Plymouth, Ca 95669-9721 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2970 Irvine, Ca 92619-4792 157-343-03 157-343-04 157-343-05 T Elaine-Johnson Houchen Ma-rilyn 0 M 0 Revoc Tr John Miller 43980 Mahlon Vail-Rd 2803 10366 Powd.erhorn River Ct 22452 Melida Temecula, Ca 92592-9602 Fountain Valley,Ca 92708-5943 Mission Viejo, Ca 92691-1708 157-343-06 157-343-17 157-343-22 Burris Stephen Durr S D Family Huntington Beach Baptist Churc Blanca &Gustavo Gallardo 18141 Beach Blvd Unit 380 8121 Ellis Ave 8092 La Palma Dr Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-5698 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1721 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1655 157-343-23 157-343-25 157-343-26 Celestino& Patricia Perez Vald.res Llc Walter Schroeder 8102 La Palma Dr 16835 Alonquin St 603 8101 La Palma Dr Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1655 Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1655 U •i I�- 157-343-27 157-343-28 157-34 3-29 Frances Andrade Cocciolo Isabellangela I Revoc Kevin Figlewicz 8081 La Palma Dr 372 Terraine Ave 8091 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1655 Long Beach, Ca 90814-1914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1767 157-343-31 157-343-32 157-343-32 John Craney Fulwider Cole Marie C M Living Fulwider Cole Marie C M Living 8101 Ellis Ave 8071 Ellis Ave 8071 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1721 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1767 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1767 I 157-352-01 157-352-02 157-352-03 Rohinton Mondegarian Jack&Jing Hsu Johnson Nathan D& K A E H Tru 25172 Champlain Rd 17 Ravendale 33701 Calle Conejo Laguna Hills, Ca 92653-5004 Irvine,Ca 92602-2450 San Juan Capistrano, Ca 92675-5016 157-352-04 157-352-05 157-352-16 Cri Properties Llc Scott Center Robert& Rebecca Leifkes 2850 Orbiter St 3835 Birch St 18311 Thomas Cir Brea,Ca 92821-6224 Newport Beach-, Ca 92660-2616 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1552 157-352-17 157-471-06 157-471-32 Michael Whitaker Jqtw Huntington Beach Housing Assoc 18321 Thomas Cir Po Box 5697 8102 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1552 Sherman Oaks, Ca 91413-5697 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8868 157-471-33 157-502-01 157-502-02 Elan Multifamily Llc Fierro J Anthony Anthony Livin Judy& Marc Dorian Richonne 18502 Beach Blvd 10411 Sunday Dr 1744 Paloma Dr Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-2019 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-3027 Newport Beach, Ca 92660-3741 157-502-03 157-502-04 159-031-01 Kevin Boethling Dady Properties Llc Kinka Llc 1931 S Robert Ln 520 S Sepulveda Blvd 304 18255 Beach Blvd Anaheim, Ca 92802-3318 Los Angeles, Ca 90049-3536 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1351 159-031-08 159-031-10 159-031-17 Turner Terry M Living Trust . Sunny-Investments Llc Ronald Beard 18421 Beach Blvd 15 Corporate Plaza Dr 240 15 Corporate Plaza Dr 240 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1329 Newport Beach, Ca 92660-1300 Newport Beach, Ca 92660-1300 159-031-18 159-031-22 159-031-24 Five Point Plaza LIc Nicholson Leslie &Audrey Trident Properties 10537 Santa Monica Blvd 300 419 El Modena Ave 461 S Glassell St Los Angeles, Ca 90025-4999 Newport Beach, Ca 92663-5112 Orange, Ca 92866-1905 - 159-102 01 159-102 43 930-034-35 G &M Realco Llc Steven Sheldon Huntington Pacifica-Monterey L 16868 A Ln 18301 Von Karman Ave 800 25871 Paseo Real Huntington Beach, Ca 92647-4831 Irvine, Ca 92612-0130 Monterey, qa 93940-6644 P ._.. 5160 '� �® III� • - - �T71'✓I 157-341-01 157-341-01 157-341-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18344 Beach Blvd 18346 Beach Blvd 18348 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1311 157-341-01 i 157-341-01 157-341-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18350 Beach Blvd 18352 Beach Blvd 18354 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 157-341-01 157-341-02 157-341-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18356 Beach Blvd 18358 Beach Blvd ! 18360 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 157-341-02 157-341-02 ! 157-341-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18362 Beach Blvd 18364 Beach Blvd 18382 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 I i 157-341-05 157-341-06 157-341-07 Occupant j Occupant Occupant 18400 Beach Blvd 18462 Beach Blvd 8031 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1312 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1312 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1719 157-341-08 157-341-11 157-341-11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8041 Ellis Ave 18441 Patterson Ln Unit A 18441 Patterson Ln Unit B Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1719 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1678 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1678 157-341-11 157-341-12 157-341-12 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18441 Patterson Ln Unit C 18421 Patterson Ln 18425 Patterson Ln Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1678 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1660 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1660 157-341-12 157-341-13 157-341-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18431 Patterson Ln 18409 Patterson Ln Unit A 18409 Patterson Ln Unit B Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1660 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1676 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1676 it 157-341-13 157-341-14 157-341-14 Occupant j Occupant Occupant 18411 Patterson Ln 18401 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18401 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1660 j, Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1662 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1662 157-341-15 157-341-15 1 157-341-16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18391 Patterson Ln Unit 101 18391 Patterson Ln Unit 102 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1600 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1600 i Huntingtop Beach, Ca 92646-1674 Etiquettf 0+� - - .... 7 , TIM 157-342-03 157-342-03 57-342-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8091 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8091 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8091 Forelle Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7714 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-7714 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7714 157-342-04 157-342-04 157-342-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7712 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-7712 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7712 157-342-04 157-342-05 157-342-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7712 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7710 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-7710 157-342-05 157-342-05 157-343-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 4 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7710 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-771U Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1668 157-343-01 157-343-01 157-343-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1668 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1668 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1668 157-343-02 157-343-02 157-343-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1670 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1670 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1670 157-343-02 157-343-03 157-343-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 4 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1670 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-7715 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7715 I 157-343-03 157-343-03 157-343-04 Occupant ! Occupant j Occupant 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7715 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7715 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7717 157-343-04 157-343-04 157-343-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7717 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7717 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7717 i 157-343-05 157-343-05 j 157-343-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7719 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-7719 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7719 � �1 ��,II I III �-- 1•• .•. IllI • • . • - • ri'✓I cu.p ,T 157-341-16 157-341-16 157-341-16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1674 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1674 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1674 i 157-341-17 157-341-17 157-341-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1672 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1672 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1672 157-341-17 157-341-18 157-341-18 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1672 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1696 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1696 157-341-18 157-341-18 157-341-19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1696 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1696 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1694 157-341-19 157-341-19 157-341-19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1694 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1694 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1694 157-341-20 157-341-20 157-341-20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1692 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1692 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1692 I 157-341-20 j 157-341-23 157-341-23 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18451 Patterson Ln Unit 101 18451 Patterson Ln Unit 102 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1692 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1720 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1720 157-342-01 157-342-01 157-342-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1682 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1682 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1682 i 157-342-01 157-342-02 157-342-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1682 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1680 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1680 I 157-342-02 157-342-02 157-342-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 4 8091 Forelle Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1680 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1680 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7714 Pat:averyxom/patents Utilisez le Gabarit Avery 5160 I !I; - . !gym#. f7 157-343-06 157-343-05 157-343-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 4 i 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-7719 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1698 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1698 157-343-06 157-343-06 157-343-21 Occupant Occupant. Occupant 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 4 18432 Patterson Ln Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1698 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1698 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1664 157-343-21 157-343-21 157-343-22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18442 Patterson Ln 8072 La Palma Dr 8092 La Palma Dr Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1664 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1664 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1655 157-343-24 157-343-24 157-343-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8131 La Palma Dr Unit A 8131 La Palma Dr Unit B 8131 La Palma Dr Unit C Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1630 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1630 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1630 157-343-25 157-343-25 157-343-25 Occupant ! Occupant Occupant 8121 La Palma Dr Unit A 8121 La Palma Dr Unit B 8121 La Palma Dr Unit C Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1632 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1632 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1632 - 157-343-28 , 157-343 28 157-343-28 Occupant Occupant ! Occupant 18412 Patterson Ln Unit A 18412 Patterson Ln Unit B 18422 Patterson Ln Unit A Huntington Beach, 92646-1666 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1666 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1657 157-343-28 157-343-31 157-343-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18422 Patterson Ln Unit B 8101 Ellis Ave 8071 1/2 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1657 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1721 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1767 157-352-01 j 157-352-01 157-352-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18312 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18312 Patterson.Ln Unit 2 18312 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1684 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1684 Huntington Beach, Ca-92646-1684 � I 157-352-01 157-352-02 157-352-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18312 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1684 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1686 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1686 157-352-02 157-352-02 157-352-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1686 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1686 Huntin ton Beach, Ca 92646-1688 157-352-03 157-352-03 Y57-352-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1688 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1688 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1688 157-352-04 157-352-04 157-352-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1690 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1690 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1690 157-352-04 157-352-05 157-352-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18302 Beach Blvd 18310 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1690 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 - 157-352-05 157-352 05 157-352-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18312 Beach Blvd 18314 Beach Blvd 18316 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 157-352-05 157-352-05 157-352-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18318 Beach Blvd 18320 Beach Blvd ! 18322 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 157-352-05 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18330 Beach Blvd 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 1 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 10 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 11 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 12 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 121 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2071 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2083 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 157-471-06 157-471-06 l 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 13 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 14 i 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 15 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-2012 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 16 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 17 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 18 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 I 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 19 i 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 1A 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 1B Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington peach, Ca 92648-2029 R . - ery.ca/gabarits . , .. . TTYV� i S I 57 157-471-06 157-471-06 -471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 1C 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 2 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 20 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 201 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 202 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 203 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 i Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-2012 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2081 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 204 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 205 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 206 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2081 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2081 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2081 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 207 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 208 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 209 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2081 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-2081 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2081 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 21 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 210 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 211 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-201.2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2043 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2043 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 212 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 213 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 214 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2043 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2043 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 - 157-471-06 1-57-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 215 18582 Beach Blvd.Unit 216 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 218 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2043 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2082 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2082 i 157 47_106- 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 22 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 223 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 224 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2012 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2082 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2082 157-471-06 157-471-06 ! 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 225 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 226 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 229 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2093 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2093 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant j Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 230 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 231 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 232 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 301 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 233 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 235 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 236 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 239 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 23B 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 240 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 Huntington Beach, Ca 92649-2012 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2063 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 3 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 8A 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 8B Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 157-471-06 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 9 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 101 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 102 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2029 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 103 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 104 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 105 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 106 81-02 Ellis Ave Unit 107 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 108 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 109 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 110 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 111 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8869 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8883 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8883 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 112 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 113 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 114 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8883 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8883 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8883 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 115 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 116 1 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 117 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8867 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8870 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 157-471-32 157-471-32 I 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 118 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 119 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 120 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 •_ .• Trm s� Ctt 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 121 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 122 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 128 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 129 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 130 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 131 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8871 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8872 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8872 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 132 i 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 133 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 134 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8872 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8872 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8872 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 135 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 136 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 137 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8872 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8872 Huntington Beach, Ca-92646-8872 I I 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 138 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 201 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 202 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-8873 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8873 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8873 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 203 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 204 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 205 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8873 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8873 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8873 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 206 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 207 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 208 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8873 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8873 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8874 i 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 209 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 210 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 211 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8874 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8874 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8884 I 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 212 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 213 1 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 214 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8884 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8884 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8884 i 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 215 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 216 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 217 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8884 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8875 Huntin ton Beach, Ca 92646-8875 sl 157-471-32 157-471-32 1 7-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 218 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 219 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 220 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8875 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8875 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8875 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 221 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 222 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 223 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8875 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8875 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8875 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 224 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 225 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 226 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8876 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8876 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8885 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 227 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 228 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 229 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8885 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8885 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8885 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 236 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 237 i 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 238 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8885 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8885 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8877 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 239 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 240 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 241. Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-8877 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8877 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8877 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 242 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 243 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 301 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8877 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8877 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8877 157-471-32 1 157-471-3-2 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 302 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 303 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 304 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8877 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 ! Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 305 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 306 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 307 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 II 157-471-32 157-471-32 j 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 308 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 309 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 310 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8878 d% .• all wwo 5 157-471-32 1 7-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 311 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 312 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 313 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8879 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-8879 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8879 i 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 314 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 315 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 316 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8879 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8879 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8879 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 317 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 318 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 319 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8879 Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-8879 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8880 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 320 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 321 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 322 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8880 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8880 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8880 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 323 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 324 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 325 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8880 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8880 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8880 i 157-471-32 ! 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 326 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 327 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 328 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8886 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8881 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8881 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 329 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 336 ! 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 337 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8881 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8881 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8881 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 33-8 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 339 % 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 340 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8881 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8882 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8882 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 341 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 342 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 343 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8882 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8882 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8882 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 100 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 104 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 108 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0924 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0924 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0924 Etiquettes d'adresse Easy q ,_ o _ .... 5160 il YI I ss ..- ; I - • . •i kk C t o P-#o' -r-rtvt � S 157-471-33 157-471-33 1�57-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 112 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 116 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 120 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0924 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0924 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0924 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 200 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 202 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 204 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 206 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 208 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 210 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 300 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 302 18502-Beach Blvd Unit 304 Huntington Beach Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 306 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 308 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 310 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 - 157-471-33 157 471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 400 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 402 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 404 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2027 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0900 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0900 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 406 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 408 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 410 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0900 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0900 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0900 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 100 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 102 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 104 Huntington-Beach, Ca 92648-0902 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0902 -Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0902 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 118 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 200 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 202 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 204 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 205 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 207 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Allez Pat:ay.'yl I lid. - _�_ .. . . .- .. .1�sy :�'� . - .... .. - INV • .� 157-471-33 157-471-33 1 7-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 209 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 211 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 213 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0903 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 215 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 217 I 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 218 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0903 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 220 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 222 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 223 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 225 j 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 226 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 227 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 228 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 229 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 230 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 231 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 232 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 234 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 235 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 236- 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 237 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0904 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 157-471-33 157-471-33 I 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 239 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 239 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 240 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648=0905 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 � I 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 241 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 242 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 243 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-09,05 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 245 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 247 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 249 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 Eti Pat .tom �I�� �- 157-471-33 i 157-471-33 r 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 251 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 255 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 256 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0923 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0905 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 257 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 258 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 259 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 261 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 262 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 300 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0906 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 302 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 304 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 305 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0906 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant ! Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 306 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 307 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 308 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0906 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0906 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 309 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 310 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 311 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 312 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 313 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 314 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 315 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 316 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 317 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 318 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 320 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 322 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 323 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 325 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 326 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0907 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 .• 41$16 7 OuP# 17 0t � 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 327 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 328 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 329 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 330 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 331 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 332 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 334 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 335 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 336 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 157-471-33 157 471 33 15 7-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 337 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 338 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 339 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0908 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 i 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 340 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 341 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 342 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 343 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 344 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 345 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 346 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 347 j 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 351 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 353 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 355 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0909 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 356 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 357 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 358 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 157-471-33 157-471-33 j 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 359 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 361 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 362 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach, Ca 9264870910 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 I o.- e•• .c- • • ® • TnyY VD57 VC�CdP-471-33 1�-C 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 400 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 402 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 404 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0910 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 405 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 406 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 407 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 408 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 409 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 410 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0910 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 411 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 412 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 413 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 414 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 415 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 416 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 417 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 418 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 420 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0911 157-471-33 157-471-33 �!i 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 422 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 4-23 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 425 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0911 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 426 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 427 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 428 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 429 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 430 1 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 431 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 157-471-33 j 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 432 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 434 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 435 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 - eela .... I TYVI � - 7 - 157-471-33 157 4 1 33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 436 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 437 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 438 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0912 I 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 439 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 440 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 441 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0913 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 - - 157 471-33 157-471-33 157 471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 442 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 443 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 444 Huntington Beach, Ca.92648-0913 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 i 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 445 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 446 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 447 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0913 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 449 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 450 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 451 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 ! Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 453 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 454 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 4S5 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0913 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 456 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 457 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 458 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 459 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 461 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 462 Beach Ca 92648-0914 Huntin ton Beach Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 0914 Huntingtong 157-471-33 j 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 500 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 502 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 504 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 i 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 505 I 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 506 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 507 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0914 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 J�1 oU?Ci Pat:avery.com/patents Utilisez le Gabarit Avery 5160 i® ; 157-471-33 157-471-33 57-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 508 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 509 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 510 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0915 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant ! Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 511 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 512 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 513 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 j 157-471-33 1 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 514 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 515 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 516 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0915 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0915 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant j Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 517 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 518 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 523 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0915 i 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant ! Occupant Occupant 18504.Beach Blvd Unit 525 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 526 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 527 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 I 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 528 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 529 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 530 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 531 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 532 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 534 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 535 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 536 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 537 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 538 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 539 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 540 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0916 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0917 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 I 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant ( Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 541 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 542 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 543 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0917 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 Etiquettes - •-- t .... .. .. i• e i" C ® e i Y ' Y•. i Y i Y i i' 'irVVl � -4 157-471-33 157 1-33 157-471-3 3 7 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 544 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 545 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 546 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0917 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 I 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant ! Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 547 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 549 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 550 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 ! Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0917 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 551 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 553 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 554 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0917 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0917 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 555 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 556 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 557 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 ! Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0918 157-471-33 j 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 558 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 559 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 561 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0918 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 562 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 600 ! 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 602 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 I Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 157-471-33 I 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant j Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 604 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 605 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 606 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0918 i 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 607 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 609 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 611 Huntington Beach, Ca 9.2648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 613 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 615 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 617 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 157-471-33 157-471-33 I 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 623 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 625 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 626 Huntingto-n Beach, Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 .• TTwl40-12-1 P #F 1 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 627 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 628 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 629 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0919 i 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 630 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 631 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 632 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0919 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0920 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 i, 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupa-nt Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 634 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 635 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 636 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 " Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 637 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 638 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 639 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0920 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0920 ! Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 1 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 640 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 641 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 642 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 i Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 643 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 644 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 645 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0920 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 646 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 647 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 649 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 650 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 651 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 653 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 654 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 655 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 656 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-471-33 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 657 i 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 658 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 659 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0921 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-0921 .. . . 5160 .-. :of ..- . • . . . 7 fYVI !�1�� CLC P 157-471-33 157-471-33 157-502-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 661 18504 Beach Blvd Unit 662 8142 Ellis Ave Unit A Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0922 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-0922 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1711 157-502-01 157-502-01 157-502-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8142 Ellis Ave Unit B 8142 Ellis Ave Unit C 8142 Ellis Ave Unit D Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1711 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1711 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1711 157-502-02 157-502-02 157-502-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8132 Ellis Ave Unit A 8132 Ellis Ave Unit B 8132 Ellis Ave Unit C Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-1710 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1710 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1710 157-502-02 157-502-03 157-502-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8132 Ellis Ave Unit D 18531 Demion Ln Unit A i 18531 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-1710 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8824 Huntington Beach,Ca.92646-8824 157-502-03 157-502-03 157-502-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18531 Demion Ln Unit C 18531 Demion Ln Unit D 18541 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-8824 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8824 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8826 157-502-04 157-502-04 157-502-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18541 Demion Ln Unit B 18541 Demion Ln Unit C 18541 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach,Ca 92646-8826 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8826 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-8826 159-031-08 159-031-08 159-031-08 Occupant Occupant Occupant 1.8421 Beach Blvd 18423 1/2 Beach Blvd 18423 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1329 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1329 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1329 159-031-08 159-031-08 159-031-08 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18425 Beach Blvd 18427 Beach Blvd 18429 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1329 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1329 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1329 159-031-10 159-031-17 159-031-22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18477 Beach Blvd 18455 Beach Blvd 18361 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1329 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1329 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1310 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit A 18351 Beach Blvd Unit B 18351 Beach Blvd Unit C Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1346 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1346 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1346 kiqug 1 it - - - . .- 60 b •� it _ T i 159-031-24 14-159-031-24 5 031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit D 18351 Beach Blvd Unit E 18351 Beach Blvd Unit F Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1346 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1347 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1347 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit G 18351 Beach Blvd Unit H 18351 Beach Blvd Unit I Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1347 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1347 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1348 159-031-24 159-031724 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit J 18351 Beach Blvd Unit K 18351 Beach Blvd Unit L Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1348 I Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1348 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1348 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 1 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 2 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 3 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1492 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1492 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1469 I 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 4 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 5 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 6 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1469 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1469 Huntington-Beach, Ca 92648-1469 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 7 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 8 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 1 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1469 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1491 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1470 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 10 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 11 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 12 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1472 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1472 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1473 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 14 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 15 j 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 16 Huntington Beach, Ca-9264-8-1473 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1473 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1474 I 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 17 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 18 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 19 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1474 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1474 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1474 159-031-24 ! 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 2 17881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 20 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 21 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1470 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1474 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1474 q s — .. p •i i i- i i i i ®i • `•• • ••-- .Use Aver�Ter�pla't@'5160 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 3 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 4 , 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 5 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1470 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1471 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1471 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 6 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 7 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 8 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1471 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1471 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1472 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 9 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 1 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 10 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1472 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1345 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1481 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 11 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 12 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 14 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1482 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1482 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1482 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 15 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 16 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 17 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1482 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1467 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1467 �I 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 18 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 19 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 2 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1467 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1467 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1480 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 20 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 21 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 3 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1468 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1468 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1480 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 4 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 5 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 6 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1480 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1480 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1480 i i 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 7 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 8 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 9 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1481 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1481 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1481 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant I Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 1 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 10 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 11 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1475 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1477 i Huntin ton Beach, Ca 92648-1477 .� Aes .,Use Avery Template 51W� 159-031-24 159-031-24 Trn 15 159 3-4��/� Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 12 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 14 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 15 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1477 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1477 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1478 i 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 16 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 17 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 18 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1478 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1478 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1478 159-031-24 ! 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 19 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 2 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 20 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1479 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1475 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1479 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 21 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 3 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 4 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1475 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1475 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 5 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 6 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 7 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1476 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1476 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1476 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-26 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 8 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 9 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 334 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1476 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1477 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-5694 i 159-031-26 159-102-01 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 335 18501 Beach Blvd 18541 Beach Blvd Unit 101 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-5694 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2053 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-8002 159-102-43 159-102-43 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant ! Occupant 18541 Beach Blvd.Unit 102 18561 Beach Blvd Unit 101 18561 Beach Blvd Unit 102 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-8002 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2057 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2057 159-102-43 159-102-43 .159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18575 Beach Blvd 18581 Beach Blvd 18583 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 I 159-102-43 159-102-43 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18585 Beach Blvd 18595 Beach Blvd 18607 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-2054 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 IPV .. il o® 159-102-43 159-102-43 T �9-102-43f� Occupant Occupant Occupant 18631 Beach Blvd 18635 Beach Blvd 18637 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-2054 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-2054 159-102-43 159-102-43 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18639 Beach Blvd 18641 Beach Blvd 18645 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2054 i 930-034-33 930-034-35 930-034-36 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 333 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 100 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 102 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-5694 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 930-034-38 930-034-39 930-034-41 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 104 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 105 1 377 Be ach each Blvd Unit 108 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 930-034-42 930-034-43 930-034-44 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 208 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 209 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 210 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 930-034-45 930-034-46 930-034-48 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 211 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 212 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 215 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 930-034-49 930-034-52 930-034-54 Occupant Occupant i Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 216 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 222 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 323 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 930-034-57 930-034-59 ! 930-034-60 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 326 18377 Beach Blvd-Unit 328 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 329 Huntington Beach,Ca 92648-1350 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 i P14 Fs r9 9--org . - - - .... .Pat: very.com patents .. . .. 1 2 5 HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc.of Realtors Huntington Beach Tomorrow President Dave Stefanides President 2134 Main St.Ste. 100 25552 La Paz Road PO Box 865 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 8 INTEROFFICE- 9 13 ETI: Corral 100 Newland House Museum Environmental, oar Jean Kimbrell,Treasurer Pres., H.B. Historical Society P.O. Box 2298 Antonia Grahalll 19820 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92647 4th FIbOC Huntington Beach,CA 92648 14 19 19 Historic Resources Board Chair O.C.Ping.&Dev.Services Dept. O.C.Planning&Develop.Dept. Kathie Schey Director Michael Balsamo 3612 Rebel Circle . P.O.Box 4048 P.O. Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 26 29 29 Department of Transportation, Dist. 12 Fountain Valley Elem.School Dist. Fountain Valley Elem.School Dist. Maureen El Harake,Branch Chief Marc Ecker Rina Lucchese,Executive Assistant 1750E 4 1h Street#100 10055 Slater Avenue 10055 Slater Avenue Santa Ana,CA 92705 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 30 130 31 HB City Elementary School Dist. HB City Elementary School Dist. Ocean View School Dist. Gregg Haulk, Superintendent John Archiald Attn:Cindy Puller,Admin.Services 17011 Beach Blvd,Ste 560 17011 Beach Blvd,Ste 560 17200 Pinehurst Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 31 1 32 j 32 Ocean View School Dist. Westminster School District Westminster School District Gustavo Balderas,Superintendent Tony Wold Marian Kim Phelps,Superintendent 17200 Pinehurst Lane 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 14121 Cedarwood Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Westminster,CA 92683 j Westminster,CA 92683 33 33 36 HB Union High School District HB Union High School District OC County Harbors, Beach&Parks Dept. Stephen Ritter Greg Plutko,Superintendent P.O. Box 4048 5832 Bolsa Avenue 5832 Bolsa Avenue Santa Ana,CA 92702 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 54 57 Third Party Environmental Review Kathleen Belohovek 58 Southern California Edison Company 9101 Five Harbors Dr. Debra Keefer 2244 Walnut Grove Ave,GO-1,Quad 2C Huntington Beach,CA.92646 7871 Seabreeze Dr Rosemead,CA 91770 Huntington Beach,CA.92648 I ' 62 62 Randy Coe,CCIM Randy Coe,CCIM Senior Vice President Senior Vice President Jim Martin Land Advisors Organization Land Advisors Organization 7542 Taylor Drive 100 Spectrum Drive,Suite 1400 p i 100 Spectrum Drive,Suite 1400 Huntington Beach,CA 9264-8 li Irvine, CA 92618 Irvine, CA 92618 F/ �/9 26>9 •• •• •• ij e •' • • ee' eeV• !• , r #/Rls7 ecru-# 930-034-36 930-034-37 ! 930-034-38 Hassan Alkhouli Christine Heewoon Kim Juguilon Anthony A 79SS Westminster Blvd 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 103 19241 Redford Ln Westminster, Ca 92683-4001 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-2135 i ! ! 930-034-40 930-034-41 930-034-45 Farah Abbassi Dmd Msd Inc j Ibrahim Ghanem Hb Office Lic 18377 Beach Blvd 106 8681 Acapulco Cir 13924 Seal Beach Blvd C Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Huntington Beach, Ca 92646-2601 Seal Beach,Ca 90740-5376 930-034-47 930-034-49 930-034-50 Ac Real Estate Holdings Llc Rassa Hb Llc Carol Young Adams rtledove Ave 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 219 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 214 9656 Tu ! Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 Fountain Valley, Ca 92708-5877 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1349 930-034-51 930-034-53 930-034-55 Yan Wang Endurance Property Holdings LI Endurance Property Holdings LI 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 220 18377 Beach Blvd 322 18377 Beach Blvd 324 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 930-034-56 ! 930-034-57 930-034-58 Endurance Property Holdings LI Van Dyke Adam A Living Tr Endurance Property Holdings LI 18377 Beach Blvd 325 2025 Lynnwood Dr j 18377 Beach Blvd 327 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 i Franklin,Tn 37069-6112 j Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 930-034-60 930-034-61 930-034-62 Indian Ridge Farzin Benjamin Pedouim Md Inc Viefhaus& Schneider 3514 Indian Ridge Cir 18377 Beach Blvd 330 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 331 Thousand Oaks, Ca 91362-4948 Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-1350 i Huntington Beach, Ca 92648-5694 I i i I j I i i I 'I j j .. Huntington Beach Wave PROOF OF PUBLICATION 2190 S.Towne Centre Place Suite 100 Anaheim, CA 92806 Legal No. 0011298908 714-796-2209 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH------ _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, August 19,2019, at 6:00 p.m.in the City Council Chambers,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following Planning and zoning items: 5190751 APPEAL OF THE_PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL 6 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18157/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO_.-17.042 Applicant:_Jeff Herbst,MC Archi- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY OF tecture,111 Pacifica,Suite 280, Irvme�A 92618 Appellant:Tahir Salim,THDT Investment,4740 Green River Road,Suite 304,Coro- CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT na,CA 92880 Request;To demolish an existing liquor store, resi- dence,and portion of a former car wash to permit a one-lot subdivi- 2000 MAIN ST sion and development of a four-story mixed-use building including9 48 new condominium residences with 891 square feet of commercial HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-2763 space and three levels of subterranean parking. Location: 8041 Ellis Avenue Beach Boulevard (NN�rth side of Ellis Ave.,between Beach Blvd.and Patterson Ln.) Ci Y ontact: Nicol le Aube,Asso- ciate Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#1 is exempt from the provi- sions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section FILE NO. 8-19-19 CC LEGAL 15182 of the CEQA Guidelines and Government Code 65457, because the proiect is within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan for which Program E I R No.08-008 was adopted and implementation AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION of the proiect would not result in any new or more severe potentially adverse environmental impacts that were not considered in the Final El R for the BECSP. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,Cali- SS. fornia 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be availapble to interesteedd rpprtigs at the City Clerk's Office or on County of Orange line at htip://www.huntmgtonbeacnca.gov on Thursday, August 15, 2019. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, You may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the respond rice Public hearing ri the described tri i in or thisPri notice,or in Publicwritten car- County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and If there are any further questions lease call the Community Devel- opmentnot a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I r our written communicationssto 71 theCityClerkthe above items. am the principal clerk of the Huntington Beach Wave, a Robin Estanislou,City clerk newspaper that has been adjudged to be a newspaper of City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Huntington Beach,California 92648 http://h untingtonbeacrica3gov/H B Pub I icComments/ Orange, State of California, on July 1, 1998, Case NO. published:TheHuntingtohBeachWaveAugust8,201911298908 A-185906 in and for the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California; that the notice, of which the annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 08/08/2019 I certify(or declare) under the penalty of perjuy under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct: Executed at Anaheim, Orange County, California, on Date:August 08, 2019. /.% Signature UP1-1 2/15/16 1