Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2019-70 Amending Residential Permit Par (Cft�F�-AS SENT) City of Huntington Beach File #: 19-974 MEETING DATE: 10/7/2019 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Oliver Chi, City Manager PREPARED BY: Tom Herbel, PE, Acting Director of Public Works Subject: Adopt Resolution No. 2019-70 amending Residential Permit Parking District "Q" affecting residents on Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane in Huntington Beach Statement of Issue: Residents along a portion of Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane have petitioned the City to be included in Permit Parking District "Q". Financial Impact: The provisions of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 10.42 requires that the residents participating in a residential permit parking district pay a proportionate share of the cost to amend the district. Typical costs include, but are not limited to, installation of signs, curb markings, which are funded in the General Fund Signs and Marking business unit 10085302, and staff time to issue permits, which are funded in the General Fund Transportation Management business unit 10085301. The total cost estimated for amending the parking district is $812 or $58 per address. Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2019-70, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Permit Parking District "Q" Within the City of Huntington Beach." Alternative Action(s): Deny the recommended action. Analysis: Permit Parking District Q was established by City Council Resolution No. 2014-59 on August 18, 2014 consisting of a portion of Wrenfield Drive, Kristopher Lane between Wrenfield Drive and Kilda Circle, and Dohrn Circle. The neighborhood is located south of Warner Avenue east of Edwards Street and is shown in Attachment 1. Parking District "Q" was amended on June 20, 2016 by City Council Resolution 2016-37 to include Kristopher Lane between Kilda Circle and Kirklund Circle. This amendment request includes adding the addresses along Wrenfield Drive not included in the current parking district, and Cobra Lane to Parking District "Q" due to commuter vehicle parking concerns. City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 2 Printed on 10/2/2019 powered7A,Legistar�6° File #: 19-974 MEETING DATE: 10/7/2019 The current parking district and proposed amendment areas are shown in Attachment 2. As required by Municipal Code Chapter 10.42 (MC 10.42), Permit Parking Districts, staff reviewed the request, determined the concerns of the residents were valid, and considered the proposed amendment are to be reasonable. Following procedures in MC 10.42 ballots were sent to the affected properties with 86% voting in support of the permit parking district amendment. A minimum of 75% of the property units in favor of the proposal is required to continue the evaluation. Following the ballot process staff investigated the parking conditions on Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane as required by (MC 10.42). Field reviews of the area showed that the south side of Wrenfield Drive requested for permit parking is regularly impacted by commuter vehicle parking with occupancies greater than 90%. Cobra Lane was not observed to have similar parking impacts, however, the residents chose to include their street reasoning the impacted parking could move to Cobra Lane if all of Wrenfield Drive were to be designated permit parking. Based on the observed parking conditions and discussion with the residents, staff recommends amending Permit Parking District "Q" to include the properties on Wrenfield Drive not a part of the existing parking district, and Cobra Lane. Staff believes findings can be made demonstrating that commuter vehicle parking unreasonably and regularly interferes with the use of available street parking for residents or their guests which is consistent with code requirements as a basis for establishing permit parking. Although the current parking restrictions of midnight to 6 a.m. would be extended along the Golden View Park frontage with the amendment, during these times the park and school are typically closed and would not conflict with code provisions restricting public parking for those uses. Public Works Commission Action: None required. Environmental Status: The project is categorically exempt from CEQA. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain infrastructure. Attachment(s): 1. Vicinity Map 2. District Q Amendment Map 3. Staff Evaluation 4. Resolution 2019-70, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Permit Parking District "Q" Within the City of Huntington Beach" City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 2 Printed on 10/2/2019 powered7e5,Legistar7", �P �Fc PERMIT PARKING B0LSA AVE. o DISTRICT Q Mc�FADDEN AVE. U � U) EDINGER z LiJ AV Y z Q N � > 'ALL p �HEIL Q Z � �' AVE. m Q o m o 0-1 a- p >- 0 (n J � � CD u) Q m WARNER AVE. 0 SLATER = AVE. C) o LLJ m 405 CD ,O TALBERT AVE. PACIFIC ELLIS AVE. GARFIELD J _ AVE. \ A cn c/) C YORKTOWN AVE. 'T ADAMS AVE. F- p O Of D q�'cF INDIANAPOLIS AVE. Y OCEAN q�F Q Of ATL=NTA Q 3: OF< AVE. m U W m wz m HAMILTON AVE. N y�r BANNING A VE. NTS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH •,J VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT Q 1 76 T WARNER AVE P P P P P P P P P P O P M � In CD 00 0) O P c� Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo Lo c0 cD cD cD cD cD cD CD �el- cD cD CD cD cD cD CD cD cD (D WRENFIELD DR IT N Lo Lo N N N N N 718 17161 Lo co � a, O 17171T `w `w `(D w Lo w w z 1719 L o P GOLDEN VIEW < 1720 17191 n coo � �co�� PARK m o O 17201 DOHRN CIR 61 1721 1 N N N N N NORINO DR pn Lo00 66 17221 (D (o (D (D cLo `nD71?0 Lo 17231 PERMIT PARKING y 17241 DISTRICT Q II KILDA CIR NO SCALE 17251 N ~ M �' 17261 of 17271 M a �n 17281 C° � RENNRICK CIR EXISTING PERMIT 17301 N F7� PARKING AREAS M 17311 � PERMIT PARKING 17321 AMENDMENT AREAS Lruw, 17331 Z KIRKLUND CIR J 0' w CL O N w Y SHENLYN DR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ATTACHMENT PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT Q AMENDMENT 2 77 Proposed Permit Parking District Q Amendment Permit Parking District Q was established by City Council Resolution No. 2014 59 on August 18, 2014 and consists ofa portion of Wreng@d Drive, Kristopher La ne between Wren\@d Drive and Kilda Circle, and Dohm Circle. On June 20, 2016, Parking D|aHa Q wasamended by City Council Resolution 2O16 37to include KHaopher Lane between Kilda Circle and 6r dnd Circle. This proposedamend mein is to include the remaining add maes along W re n§el d Drive no a part of the current parking district, and Cobra Lane to Parking D!»HR Q The location of the neighborhood is east of Edwards St reetsouthof Warner Avenue and is shown on the vicinity map below. » � j y, Syy PERMIT PARKING � y DISTRICT o t a AVE / ƒ »\ems AVE, w:c XVE. OHEIL\ 7 \ \ \ \ -= \ . \ / ~ / WARNERz \ «»w » SLA r »w y « e ! PACIFICELLI\ y : :m ` — + � «mELD \ AVE. KTONN A > « « � wwr »my i,av m: - . ^ \± . ec } 'EAx AT na f » / am \ ,AVILTON AVE, wy y .may\ a: « < :® z v v g: � . VICINITY MAP - PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT Q I Page 78 Residents along Wrenfield Drive not currently a part of Permit Parking District Q, and Cobra Lane have requested to be included in the parking district. They submitted a petition to add their addresses to District Q due to on-street parking impacts from the nearby apartments and condominiums with the same parking restrictions as the current district (midnight to 6 a.m., every day). The requested parking restriction area would include both the residential and Golden View Park side of a portion of Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane shown in Figure 1. The residents included the Golden View Park side along Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane due to the greater number of on-street parking available compared to the residential street side and the reported heavy use of that area by commuter parking. Figure 1 shows the current and requested permit parking areas for Parking District Q. T WARNER AVE r � cD UD co co co UD UD co to UD UD ca u> UD UD <o ,�� WRENFIELD R N N N N N N N 71$ 17161 M M tD 1`1 M O — ` 17171 Uo W Uo UD co co co 1719 a GOLDEN VIEW 1724 17191 LO W W � (0 LID ��O PARK r a 17201 HRN IR 612 co 172111 rNm C14� «� � NORINO'CALE DR66`17221 m Lo � toon �17231 PERMIT PARKING 17241 tK1LDA C1RDISTRICT QNU 17251 ` N AMENDMENT 117261_ Ln 0 117271' a ors © 117281 w ARENNRICK EXISTING PERMIT PARKING 17301 N DISTRICT 4 M 17311 Ln -Lo PROPOSED AREAS TO ADD 17321'r TO DISTRICT O M U, di 17331E Z KIRKLUND CIR J o_ w O E F 1 [� Y SHENLYN DR 1 1 I Figure 1. Existing and Proposed Permit Parking Areas for Permit Parking District Q 2 Page 79 As required by Municipal Code Chapter 10.42, staff reviewed the request, determined the petition and concerns of the residents were valid, and considered the proposed amendment area to be reasonable. Staff prepared and mailed letters to the affected properties explaining the permit parking district requirements, boundaries, and included ballots for voting on the permit parking district amendment. Staff followed up with a letter a few weeks later to remind residents to return their ballot. Per Municipal Code 10.42 a minimum of 75% of the property units (1 vote per unit) shall be in favor of the permit parking district amendment to move the request for further consideration. Of the 14 affected properties, 13 ballots were returned with 12 votes or 86% voting in favor of the permit parking district amendment. The voting results are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 -Voting Results for Permit Parking District Q Amendment Street #Addresses # "YES" # "NO" # Ballots not Votes Votes Returned Wrenfield Drive 9 8 1 - Cobra Lane 5 4 - 1 As required by code, staff investigated the parking conditions on Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane. The code requires that facts exist that reasonably establish that the following exists in order to continue the process for further consideration: • Unrestricted parking creates a situation in which the subject streets cannot be used for regular parking by residents or their guests, or creates a situation that commuter vehicles or their occupants produce significant sources of health, safety, or welfare concerns. Below summarizes the on-street parking information gathered from field surveys of the area. Although late night hours such as midnight were not observed staff believed if surveys were conducted early morning and past 6:00 p.m. an indicative sampling of the parking conditions during the restriction times could be obtained. 3 1 P a g e 80 Field Survey 1: Thursday, 6:10 am Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Wrenfield Drive, north side 3 8 38% Wrenfield Drive, south side 14 14 100% Cobra Lane, east side 0 8 0% Cobra Lane, west side 0 8 0% Field Survey 2: Saturday, 6:15 pm Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Wrenfield Drive, north side 5 8 63% Wrenfield Drive, south side 13 14 93% Cobra Lane, east side 0 8 0% Cobra Lane,west side 1 8 13% Field Survey 3: Tuesday, 6:30 pm Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Wrenfield Drive, north side 5 8 63% Wrenfield Drive,south side 13 14 93% Cobra Lane, east side 0 8 0% Cobra Lane,west side 1 8 13% Field Survey 4: Sunday, 7:30 am Street No. Parked Parking Percent Vehicles Capacity Occupancy Wrenfield Drive, north side 3 8 38% Wrenfield Drive, south side 13 14 93% Cobra Lane,east side 0 8 0% Cobra Lane,west side 0 8 0% 4 Page 81 Analysis: Field reviews of the area showed that the south side of Wrenfield Drive requested for permit parking is regularly impacted by commuter vehicle parking. The north side of Wrenfield Drive was not observed to have similar parking impacts as the south side. This could be due to being more convenient for commuter vehicles to park on the south side of Wrenfield Drive entering from Edwards Street and in an area with an open parking segment without driveways. Cobra Lane was not observed to be impacted by commuter vehicle parking. However, the residents included that street for permit parking reasoning that the impacted parking could move to Cobra Lane if all of Wrenfield Drive were to be designated permit parking. Staff agrees with the assumption that it is likely Cobra would be impacted if the district is extended on Wrenfield. Including Cobra Lane may be enough distance to discourage the commuter vehicles from the nearby condominiums and apartments from parking in the neighborhood. It should be noted that the ordinance states that permit parking districts are not to affect other reasonable uses of on-street parking by the public including parks and schools. The current parking restrictions, midnight to 6 a.m., would be extended to the Golden View Park frontage with the proposed amendment. During these parking restriction times, the park and school are typically closed and, therefore, would not affect the available on-street public parking for those uses. Municipal Code 10.42 requires that specific conditions shall exist for a parking district request to move forward for consideration to the City Manager's office. These include: unrestricted parking creates a situation where on-street parking cannot be regularly used by residents and guests; or, unrestricted parking by commuter vehicles produces significant sources of health, safety, or welfare concerns. Based on the field evaluations and discussions with the residents staff finds that the unrestricted parking on Wrenfield Drive creates a situation where the commuter parking regularly interferes with residents and their guests parking. Staff supports amending Permit Parking District Q, adding properties along Wrenfield Drive not currently included, and Cobra Lane to District Q. 5 1 P a g e 82 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT "Q" WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 4051 allowing the establishment of parking districts in residential areas under certain conditions; and The citizens owning certain properties fronting the residential streets known as Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane have petitioned to be included in Permit Parking District"Q", as more particularly shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein; and The Director of Public Works reviewed the petition, sent a ballot for further consideration to residents of the petitioned streets, and caused an investigation which reasonably established that unrestricted parking: interferes with available parking for residents and guests; Therefore, the Director of Public Works has found the requirements of Ordinance 4051 to be reasonably fulfilled, and determined that the Permit Parking District will not affect other uses of on- street parking. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The above recitals are all true and correct 2. Permit Parking District "Q" is hereby amended to include properties fronting the above- mentioned roadways, effective every day from 12 a.m. to 6 a.m. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of October , 2019. r' Mayor 6VItA OVED: APPROVED AS RM: City Manager ity Attorney 7TIATED AND APPROVED: Z:2 Director of Pu he Wor s 19-7985/212170 -70 EXHIBIT "A" T WARNER AVE rO r— I'•) \td' -0 c W o 0�\ /T3), r V O l!) tf) Ln In to In (o Co (o Co W (o to CD Co CO Co Co cp LD (p Co Co �p (o �p (D WRENFIELD DR 718 17161 M uo co r rn O 17171 to ``no m ``no coo co co 719 *.,0 GOLDEN VIEW Q 1720 17191 Lo Lo ,Co L i Lo PARK w co co co w17201CIR 17211 N N N N N NORINO DR o 17221 to co w Lo Lo co I 17231 PERMIT PARKING �I LO 17241 t° DISTRICT Q KILDA CIR No CALF 17251 N ~ M N 17261 uO to c0 w 17271 M 3 Lo 17281 cD EXISTING PERMIT RENNRICK CIR ® PARKING AREAS 17301 N M 17311 PERMIT PARKING 17321 AMENDMENT AREAS M 17331 Lo Z KIRKLUND CIR J LLA 2 0_ O H N_ m Y SHENLYN DR FIGURE 1 - EXISTING AND AMENDMENT PERMIT PARKING AREAS FOR PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT Q Res. No. 2019-70 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 7, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: Brenden, Semeta, Peterson, Posey, Delgleize , Hardy NOES: None ABSENT: Carr RECUSE: None City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California Sam, Darren From: Stachelski, Bob Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 10:55 AM To: Sam, Darren Subject: FW: Parking restrictions Q SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION -----Original Message----- M9Afing Data: From: Bridget Clancy<bbviking70@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday,October 07, 2019 10:43 AM Agenda I�Bm To:Stachelski, Bob<bstacheiski@surfc!ty-hb.org> Subject: Parking restrictions Q Don't know if you received a letter from the City today advising of the intention to expand the area covered by the parking restrictions on Wrenfield &other streets in the tract behind the complex. If you want to object, please feel free to copy& paste the email I sent to the contact bstacheiski@surfcity-hb.org below.Won't do any good, I'm sure, but it really is annoying We received your letter dated October 1st notifying of the proposed amendments to Parking District Q,today, Please let me first start by saying that I have lived in Villa Earner for 20 years&others for up to 40. When people move into the neighborhood behind the complex they can see that there are many big condo complexes around & parking might overflow. Also we all pay taxes for the streets to keep in good condition,street sweeping, police patrols through the neighborhoods but we are having further parking restrictions placed upon us. I also have family over a few times a year& need to park my vehicle around the corner so they can park in my complex. I work late hours so I walk home after parking on the street at 1:00 a.m & now I might have to walk even farther!This is wrong on so many levels! Back to the letter,the letter advised we should refer to Figure 1 on the reverse side of the letter to see the current& proposed boundaries. However,the reverse of the letter was blank,with no Figure 1 to refer to. In addition,we received the letter on Friday afternoon. It states that the deadline for submitting comments is noon on Monday October 7th &the meeting is to be held at 6:00pm that evening. This does not give sufficient notice to either comment or make arrangements to attend the meeting& appears to be another effort by residents&the City Council to steamroller these unnecessary&discriminatory parking restrictions through. Please regard this e-mail as a formal objection to the proposed amendments. Thank you, Bridget Clancy i Sam, Darren From: Stachelski, Bob Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 6:44 AM To: Sam, Darren Subject: FW: Permit Parking District Q From: Kayla Marley<kmmarley90@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 05, 2019 4:56 PM To:Stachelski, Bob<bstachelslci@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Kevin Gatewood X 313<KGatewood@optimumpm.com> Subject: Permit Parking District Q To whom it may concern: Unforlunately, I am in a Masters program and can not attend the council meeting on October 7th,but I would like my voice to be heard. Today we received a letter indicating that Wrenfield and Cobra lane are being discussed for permitted parking.We currently live in the Villa Warner condos and was only given one parking spot;there are two vehicles currently used by occupants of this residence.We have been on the list for an additional parking spot for seventeen months and have not been approved of the addition; therefore,we park off of Wrenfield. These streets are public streets,and as local residents,we should have access to park vehicles near our residence. Should this amendment pass, residences of Villa Warner should be given an option to purchase city parking permits for District Q. We hope you consider the residents in the Villa Warner condos as much as you do the residents on Wrenfield and Cobra,as we too are paying taxes to the city of Huntington Beach and should have access to parking on a public street. Thank you for your consideration, Kayla Marley and Michael Cyrus SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mewing Date:_ Agenda Item No.• / y Sam, Darren From: Stachelski, Bob Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 6:42 AM To: Sam, Darren Subject: FW: Proposed Amendment re: Wrenfield and Cobra From:Vickie Hamilton<Vickie.Hamilton@csulb.edu> Sent: Friday,October 04, 2019 10:55 AM To:Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed Amendment re:Wrenfield and Cobra Hi...just received your letter regarding changed in permit parking district "Q." No information or map was included on the reverse side of the letter. Will more information be provided? thanks Vickie Hamilton 6752 Rook Drive Huntington Beach 92647 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:, I /t)- -,7-- _JD/,q Agenda Item No.: Y (P-1 C1 -7 L/ Sam, Darren From: Stachelski, Bob Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 10:54 AM To: Sam, Darren Subject: FW: District Q Parking Permit From:Jkoukol556<jkoukol556@aol.com> Sent:Monday,October 07, 2019 10:28 AM To: Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: District Q Parking Permit In reference to proposed amendment: as long as permits are available to all tax paying residents of the city, regardless of where they reside. To favor just those who live in the restricted area is discrimination. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: Agenda item NO.`/ Sam, Darren From: Stachelski, Bob Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 10:52 AM TO: Sam, Darren Subject: FW: Proposed amendment of residential parking SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION From: Ross Potter<speedo007@gmail.com> Mwdng per: Sent: Monday,October 07, 2019 9:12 AM To:Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Barbara@barbara4hb.com; bdelgleize@surfcity-hb.org Agenda Rem Subject: Proposed amendment of residential parking RE: 15.19-974 Adopt Resolution No. 2019-70 amending Residential Permit Parking District"Q" affecting residents on Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane in Huntington Beach Dear Mr. Stachelski, It should be noted that the letter submitted to nearby residents regarding the proposed amendment listed below was incomplete as none of the figures outlined in the letter were printed on the reverse side of the letter. This pertinent information is critical for the recipients of this letter. My recommendation to you is to postpone the decision regarding this amendment as this omission should be corrected and maps/figures should be sent to those affected. Additionally, the information on the letter is erroneous. It states the existing hours as midnight to 6 pm. The hours are currently midnight to 6 am. In addition to the above I'd like to state my objection to the proposed change: A relative of mine owns and lives in the Villa Warner complex located directly behind Wrenfield Dr. This is not an apartment complex but rather over 200 condominiums. These condominiums are FHA approved for lending purposes, which among other factors requires at least 50%primary residency. These "residents" pay substantial taxes every year like all of us. As a Huntington Beach resident and property owner for over 35 years I am also affected by this decision and therefore have a legitimate say in this matter. Residents do not own the street in front of their house. They do not dictate who can travel or park on the street. The streets you recommend extending are not near attractions like the convention center or downtown. Residents on the street have garages and driveways. There is plenty of parking available and the permitted street during the midnight to 6 am period is usually vacant. This is substantially different than those who live downtown where parking is truly an issue as it is a tourist attraction and homes are constructed differently. Residents there truly need parking. i The reason I am affected, as anyone who visits or lives at the Villa Warner complex, is that a person shouldn't have to walk a quarter of a mile to get there. Particularly after midnight or in bad weather. There are dual income families that live in the complex that require 2 cars. Most of the units only allow parking for 1 car. Someone visiting these residents should not have to park a substantial distance away. These gated condominiums are not apartments (they used to be) and it is not a party environment. A visiting parent, grandparent or just a friend shouldn't have to canvas the area just to find parking. Not allowing nearby parking is actually counterproductive as it will increase traffic for those looking for parking. I can elaborate further as to why your proposal should not occur but in a nutshell I believe this is situation where the 14 or so homeowners just don't like someone parking in front of their houses. It is not a parking issue where there is not adequate space for them to park their cars. If it were the simplest solution would be to issue them parking permits to use the current permitted portion of the street. You are issuing permits to people who don't need it and denying those who actually need parking. The exclusive nature of having permitted parking on these streets with houses with double garages and driveways and no nearby attractions or late night venues is discriminatory. My main issue here is the process with which this is occurring. You've mailed out incomplete and inaccurate letters to "residents" and only allowed them 3 days to respond. It could be argued that you are trying to fast track the process. You did not ask their opinion nor did you survey them. I'm aware it could be argued that the information is available on-line, but not everyone has access to it and the letter specifically states it was included and was not. Sorry, but this is to also help you as this amendment could be repealed if implemented if procedurally the city did not follow what it stated it provided to those affected. I appreciate your time in this matter and per your letterl am submitting this to you in time for it to be presented to the city council. Regards, Ross Potter RE: 16.19-974 Adopt Resolution No. 2019-70 amending Residential Permit Parking District"Q"affecting residents on Wrenfield Drive and Cobra Lane in Huntington Beach Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No. 2019-70, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Permit Parking District"Q"Within the City of Huntington Beach." 2 Sam, Darren From: Stachelski, Bob Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 9:03 AM To: Sam, Darren Subject: FW: Proposed Amendments to Parking District Q Not sure if I had sent this one. Bob From:Jules Titow<jandehb@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday,October 04, 2019 5:58 PM To:Stachelski, Bob<bstacheiski@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed Amendments to Parking District Q We received your letter dated October 1st notifying of the proposed amendments to Parking District Q,today. The letter advised we should refer to Figure 1 on the reverse side of the letter to see the current& proposed boundaries. However, the reverse of the letter was blank, with no Figure 1 to refer to. In addition, we received the letter on Friday afternoon. It states that the deadline for submitting comments is noon on Monday October 7th & the meeting is to be held at 6:00pm that evening. This does not give sufficient notice to either comment or make arrangements to attend the meeting & appears to be another effort by residents & the City Council to steamroller these unnecessary & discriminatory parking restrictions through. Please regard this e-mail as a formal objection to the proposed amendments. Thank you, Elaine Wardle & Jules Titow SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION mwft Date: /D- 7-2:L�/'/ Agenda Item No.:_ / Sam, Darren From: Stachelski, Bob Sent: Monday, October 07, 2019 12:06 PM To: Sam, Darren Subject: FW: Proposed Amendment of Residential Permit Parking District"Q"- Resolution 2019-70, From: Chris Maimone<cmaimone141@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,October 07, 2019 12:00 PM To:Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed Amendment of Residential Permit Parking District"Q"- Resolution 2019-70, Dear Mr Stachelski and City Council, I am writing to propose a continuance and moving item for consideration to the next City Council meeting. The letter was sent to me and ONLY received on October 4. This gave me less than 24 business hours to respond as well as my neighbors to this change to public parking, on Huntington Beach city streets. All the homeowners at 6600 Warner avenue pay taxes for all these city streets and now you want to limit our use again by cutting off more of these public streets for public parking. This is not sufficient time to review the considered changes and comment and also attend the meeting to express concerns and issues prior to this meeting. Everyone living at 6600 Warner Avenue are home owners. We have heard at other sessions the complaints from those neighbors about people being drunk and also parking issues. Where are the complaints? and Police reports on these issues? Are they certain these are individuals from adjoining neighborhoods? I personally drive through that tract on a weekly basis and never see any lack of street parking at anytime. At this time the residents of Condominium Complex at 6600 Warner Avenue wish to have this revisited and not voted on this subject at the October 7th meeting for the following reasons: 1. Have more time to review this impact to any of our occasional guest parking. We all pay taxes for all city streets. We deserve a right to have some use of these spaces on an occasional basis. (Regardless of whether we live in the tract. The city has red zoned all Edwards parking so they have impacted our ability to use open parking on Warner and Edwards.) 2. Request a complete sampling of multiple weekends to survey parking %s available. During the week is not an adequate measure. Thank you for your consideration. Resolution 2019-70, Agenda Item 10.42.040 Resident Requested Permit Parking District A. Residents may request that the City create a Permit Parking District by submitting a petition signed by no less than either 2011/o of the Residents or 25 Residents, whichever is less, to the Director I setting forth the proposed Permit Parking District boundaries, the purpose of the Permit Parking District, and any other relevant information. The Director will review the information presented in the petition and within a reasonable time make a preliminary determination if the petition is valid. The Director at his or her sole discretion may investigate the permit and/or proposed Permit Parking District, including contacting Residents to verify their signatures. B. The Director at his or her sole discretion may modify the proposed boundaries of the proposed Permit Parking District to include roadways, alleyways, or other conspicuous passageways, or portions thereof, that may be substantially affected by the Permit Parking District. The additional Residents will receive notices and be provided opportunities as applicable as if included in the initial request. C. If the Director determines that the concerns expressed by the Residents require further investigation and/or consideration, the Director will send a letter to each Property Unit within the proposed Permit Parking District notifying the Residents of the Proposed Permit Parking District with a description of the boundaries, the purpose, the cost, and any other relevant information. D. The letter will contain a ballot with instructions and requirements regarding voting on the creation of the Permit Parking District. Each Property Unit will be allotted one vote. The Property Unit owner, regardless of residency, will have the initial opportunity to cast a vote for the Property Unit. In the absence of the Property Unit owner vote, the vote of a tenant of the Property Unit will be counted. The City will send a reminder letter one week prior to ballot's due date. E. The Director shall determine whether a minimum of 75% of the Property Units are in favor of the proposed Permit Parking District. If a minimum of 75% of the Property Units are in favor, the Director will cause an investigation by the City to be conducted to determine whether facts exist that reasonably establish any of the following unrestricted parking issues: 1. Unrestricted parking creates a situation in which the subject streets cannot be used for parking by Residents or their guests because Commuter Vehicle parking unreasonably and regularly interferes with the use of the available street parking; or 2. Unrestricted parking creates a situation where Commuter Vehicles or their occupants produce significant sources of health, safety, or welfare concerns. 3. If the Director reasonably determines that one or more of the above exist, and the Director reasonably determines that the Permit Parking District will not unduly affect other reasonable uses of on-street parking, including parks and schools, by the public, the Director will present such findings to the City Manager who may at his or her sole discretion place the matter on the City Council agenda for further consideration by the City Council. The Director will send notice to each Property Unit and any property within 500 feet of the proposed Permit Parking District boundaries with the date and time of the City Council meeting. (4051-5/15) Thank you for your consideration, Christine Maimone 6600 Warner Avenue Unit 222 and Unit 97 310-428-4661 SUPPLEMENTAL cc : City Council COMMUNICATION Mw tg Date: /0 f- l Agenda Item No.�__ z 10/7/2019 MY CIVIC CMS Agenda & Public Hearing Comments - #194973 sub type City Council Meeting COMMENTS&ADDITIONAL NOTES Dear City Council: At this time the residents of Condominium Complex at 6600 Warner Avenue wish to have this revisited and not voted on this subject at the October 7th meeting for the following reasons: 1. Have more time to review this impact to any of our occasional guest parking.We all pay taxes for all city streets.We deserve a right to have some use of these spaces on an occasional basis. (Regardless of whether we live in the tract.The city has red zoned all Edwards parking so they have impacted our ability to use open parking on Warner and Edwards.) 2. Request a complete sampling of multiple weekends to survey parking%s available. During the week is not an adequate measure. Resolution 2019-70, Agenda Item 10.42.040 Resident Requested Permit Parking District A. Residents may request that the City create a Permit Parking District by submitting a petition signed by no less than either 20%of the Residents or 25 Residents,whichever is less,to the Director setting forth the proposed Permit Parking District boundaries,the purpose of the Permit Parking District,and any other relevant information.The Director will review the information presented in the petition and within a reasonable time make a preliminary determination if the petition is valid.The Director at his or her sole discretion may investigate the permit and/or proposed Permit Parking District, including contacting Residents to verify their signatures. B.The Director at his or her sole discretion may modify the proposed boundaries of the proposed Permit Parking District to include roadways,alleyways, or other conspicuous passageways,or portions thereof,that may be substantially affected by the Permit Parking District.The additional Residents will receive notices and be provided opportunities as applicable as if included in the initial request. C. If the Director determines that the concerns expressed by the Residents require further investigation and/or consideration,the Director will send a letter to each Property Unit within the proposed Permit Parking District notifying the Residents of the Proposed Permit Parking District with a description of the boundaries,the purpose,the cost,and any other relevant information. D.The letter will contain a ballot with instructions and requirements regarding voting on the creation of the Permit Parking District. Each Property Unit will be allotted one vote.The Property Unit owner, regardless of residency,will have the initial opportunity to cast a vote for the Property Unit. In the absence of the Property Unit owner vote,the vote of a tenant of the Property Unit will be counted.The City will send a reminder letter one week prior to ballot's due date. E.The Director shall determine whether a minimum of 75%of the Property Units are in favor of the proposed Permit Parking District. If a minimum of 75%of the Property Units are in favor,the Director will cause an investigation by the City to be conducted to determine whether facts exist that reasonably establish any of the following unrestricted parking issues: 1. Unrestricted parking creates a situation in which the subject streets cannot be used for parking by Residents or their guests because Commuter Vehicle parking unreasonably and regularly interferes with the use of the available street parking;or 2. Unrestricted parking creates a situation where Commuter Vehicles or their occupants produce significant sources of health,safety,or welfare concerns. 3. If the Director reasonably determines that one or more of the above exist, and the Director reasonably determines that the Permit Parking District will not unduly affect other reasonable uses of on-street parking, including parks and schools, by the public,the Director will present such findings to the City Manager who may at his or her sole discretion place the matter on the City Council agenda for further consideration by the City Council.The Director will send notice to each Property Unit and any property within 500 feet of the proposed Permit Parking District boundaries with the date and time of the City Council meeting. (4051-5/15) Thank you for your consideration. SUPPLEMENTAL Opened: By: Phone: COMMUNICATION 10/07/2019 Christine 310-428- 12:01 PM Maimone 4661 MA@bng Date. ' 70 _ -7 _ 2�0 1 Closed: Email: Device: --/--/---- cmaimone141@gnWI1Zom AAQ Agenda Item NO.-,.ZF 7 https://mycity.mycivicapps.com/rai_v2/index/4300 1/1