Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStudy Session #2 - 19-852 - Magnolia Tank Farm Project Suppl Magnolia Tank Farm Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 17-001 General Plan Amendment (GPA) No.17-001 Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 17-001 Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) No. 17-005 Local Coastal Program Amendment (LCPA) No. 17-001 Development Agreement (DA) No. 19-001 Nov. 18, 2019 +pi.• t SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee"Data: Agenda 1tm No.' .-.. .-- - JECT SITE ■ Vacant 29 acre property ■ West side of Magnolia at Banning �-- ■ Former above ground oil ti y PROJECT SITE storage tanks serving - adjacent power plant ■ Recently construction worker parking and construction laydown yard for new power plant f REQUEST - GPA 17-001 - To amend the land use designation: ■ from current Public (P) ■ to four new General Plan designations: R M—S - 1.0pen Space-Conservation (OS-C); p 2.Open Space-Park (OS-P); 3.Residential Medium Density (RM); and 4.Commercial Visitor(CV); with a Specific Plan Overlay ,RM-sP p RM-sp RL \ Y P ` R_ cv-Sp r / os� 0S-S A&S-P Existing Proposed REQUEST ZMA 17-001 -To amend the zoning designation: ■ from current Public-Semipublic with Oil Production Overlay and Coastal Zone Overlay v r (PS-O-CZ) I � � j�■ to Specific Plan with Coastal Zone Overlay (SP- ; ; ; l_ 18-CZ) SP-10 rtr*tttt 4� ; . ... S f— V (� f Existing Proposed REQUEST--- 0 ZTA 17.005 — To establish the Magnolia Tank Farm Specific Plan (MTFSP) including development standards for visitor serving commercial, residential, and open space uses • LCPA 17-001 — To amend the City's LCP pursuant to the GPA, ZMA, and ZTA subject to approval by the CA Coastal Commission • DA 19-001 —To enter into a development agreement for the subject site to 1) vest the permitted uses, density, and intensity of use for 15 year term, 2) ensure financial benefits, and 3) ensure off-site improvements • EIR 17-001 — To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the project REQUEST Specific Plan establishes zoning standards for AL - development of a mixed-use, master planned site '( � ' consisting of: ! v 7 a PA 78 Planning Area 1: Coastal Conservation: a° ° 2.8 acres of upland habitat with public trail mw SPaM1 PA 7 � Planning Area 2: Open Space-Parks and Recreation: f— -FwsResweMw PA t—�� 2.8 acres of park —PA 2C PA 7A ' Ma Parl--ice PAS Planning Area 3: Residential: •� Loa,e Grmr Hasa Rem -•j--� 250 medium density for-sale residential units(more �,• .,� . � �: compact and taller than traditional SFD) •�-' ----PA A, Magndu MYih .•.* Planning Area 4: Commercial Visitor: 230,000 sq.ft. lodge with a maximum of: NT5 175 market rate guest rooms, Legend 40 rooms of guesthouse-style, budget-oriented, •••••- Spn<rfic Plan Area family/group overnight accommodations;and PA1-Coastal Caiservation CC) -PA3-For-Sale ResWenttal(RM) ancillaryretail and dining facilities P I-. en Space-Parks and 9 ,�,ta,la5-�„ PA 4-Conwnerad Ysrcar(M RZQUEST ■ Development Agreement vests the proposed land use changes in return for: ✓ Payment of$2.5 million to the City which can be used for any purpose but will prioritize funds for capital improvement projects within a one mile radius of subject property ✓ Magnolia St. and Hamilton Ave. improvements along Ascon property Curb, gutter, sidewalk, and undergrounding utility lines ✓ Requirement for hotel quality standards ✓ Phased development ■ Overall request for legislative land use changes only and establishing development standards for future; No development proposed at this time REQUEST EIR concluded project would have less than significant impacts for: ✓ Aesthetics ✓ Air Quality (with mitigation) ✓ Biological Resources (with mitigation) ✓ Cultural Resources ✓ Geology and Soils (with mitigation) ✓ Hazards and Hazardous Materials (with mitigation) ✓ Hydrology and Water Quality ✓ Land Use and Planning ✓ Population and Housing ✓ Public Services ✓ Recreation ✓ Tribal Cultural Resources ✓ Utilities and Service Systems 1. R - fi- _ ■ EIR concluded project would have significant and unavoidable impacts for: ✓ Greenhouse Gas Emissions (exceedance of SCAQMD's draft interim threshold for residential uses) ✓ Noise (pile driving annoyance during construction of hotel) ✓ Transportation and Traffic (City of Newport Beach and Caltrans intersections mitigable but City of Huntington Beach does not have authority to implement) ■ 121 EIR comment letters received ■ EIR Response to Comments and Errata completed and made available for public review eLANNTNG COMMISS[ON ■ Planning Commission conducted four study sessions and one public hearing on project ■ Planning Commission recommends 1. Certification of the EIR—with modification to MM N01-3 (Pile Driving Vibration) to require peer review of feasible alternative methods to reduce annoyance; and 2. Approval of GPA, ZMA, ZTA, LCPA, and DA—with modifications to the MTFSP (recreation area, building height, parking, roof decks, phasing, etc.) and to keep DA funds for improvements near project site NEXT STEPS ■ City Council public hearing tentatively Dec. 16, 2019 ■ Submit LCPA to Coastal Commission for certification if approved by City Council ■ Applicant to submit entitlements for actual development (conditional use permit, coastal development permit, tract map, etc.) for Planning Commission review at a public hearing --J END Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 4:43 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm Study Session on the Agenda for Mon., 11/18/19 AGENDA COMMENT From: Cari Swan<cswanie@aol.com> Sent:Thursday, November 14, 2019 4:40 PM To: Chi, Oliver<oliver.chi@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm Study Session on the Agenda for Mon., 11/18/19 Dear Mr. Chi, I am writing to protest the Study Session Item entitled Magnolia Tank Farm Overview scheduled prior to the City Council Meeting on November 18, 2018 1 do not recall in any prior City Council meeting a request by any city council members to schedule this Study Session so must assume it was either you and Ursula Luna-Reynosa that scheduled this session. If you requested this topic since you are new to HB and have not followed this project, may I suggest you take the time to go back and watch Planning Commission videos. If it was requested by Ursula may I suggest that you have a private meeting with her to understand her goals and objectives because I can assure you from having attended every planning commission meeting, every community meeting and the EIR scoping meetings on this project that the community has studied this ad nauseam! Add to this all of the angst and disruption to life in SE HB from the ASCON project and AES start-up....this community is beyond their final straw!!! My reaction to this study session is that it was scheduled to serve as a lobbying effort to assist Shopoff Development, pure and simple. I'm fairly certain that Shopoff has already invested tens of thousands of dollars to lobby and inform our council members what they are hoping to accomplish. The only people in this city who DO NOT have anyone listening or lobbying for them are the CITIZENS, short of a few council members. I don't think they need to waste any more city resources or time for their marketing and lobby efforts....nor do I think you and/or Ursula need to assist them in this effort. respectfully ask that you remove this Study Session and wait for the presentation to council on December 16th and let the project stand on it's own merits. Respectfully, Cari Swan SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Medng Dace: //-/ Agenda Item i }4 I ROUX MAGNOLIA TANK FARM 112TORICAL SUMMARY & ENVI RON MENTAL STATUS 21845 MAGNOLIA STREET,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA For: Huntington Beach City Council By: Roux Associates, Inc. on behalf of SLF HB-Magnolia LLC November 18, 2019 Roux\ Presentation Overview Historical Use of MTF Pre-development Post-development Questions Related to MTF History Chemicals of Potential Concern for MTF Crude oil (well drilling/oil production) Fuel oil (ASTs) Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process (DTSC, HBFD, City) Environmental Sampling Completed Ascon Considerations Questions Related to MTF Environmental Status Roux' Presentation Guide Historical Use of MTF • Pre-development • Post-development 2. Questions Related to MTF History 3. Chemicals of Potential Concern for MTF • Crude oil (well drilling/oil production) • Fuel oil (ASTs) 4. Environmental Status of MTF • Regulatory Process (DTSC, HBFD, City) • Environmental Sampling Completed • Ascon Considerations 5 Questions Related to MTF Environmental Status Page 3 Roux; 1. Historical Use of MTF c Agricultural from at least 1930s until —mid/late 1960's Three (3) oil wells drilled in 1955 & abandoned 1972 Three (3) 25 million-gallon above ground fuel-oil storage tanks constructed in —1970 for HBGS ASTs removed in 2017 (-45 years) Site most recently used as temporary construction staging area 4',, 4 R� OUX Historical Uses ( 1927) PK l Y ,�✓rfi Roux' Historical Uses ( 1938) r r = 11/18/2019 1951 USGS Topo Map - i� 13 "HUNTINGTON!BEACH •� s — AIRPORT I ~ . 24 3„ r M Ali(f - a emu^ i I 4 11/18/2019 i' i r e +U t f -V a d a r ti ,Jp, � •'�� ' s IV Tv bi ry t "a '' . 7. 5 I Roux Historical Use of MTF - Recap Agricultural - 1930s until -mid/late 1960's Three (3) oil wells - drilled 1955/abandoned 1972 Three fuel-oil ASTs constructed in -1970 for HBGS ASTs on-Site -45 years (demolished 2017) Site vacant (most recently construction staging area) Presentation Guide Roux i Historical Use of MTF • Pre-development • Post-development 2. Questions Related to MTF History 3. Chemicals of Potential Concern for MTF • Crude oil (well drilling/oil production) • Fuel oil (ASTs) 4. Environmental Status of MTF • Regulatory Process (DTSC, HBFD, City) • Environmental Sampling Completed • Ascon Considerations 5. Questions Related to MTF Environmental Status 1 • 2. Questions Related to MTF History Roux' Was MTF historically used for a landfill like Ascon? Ascon and MTF were always separate and distinct with no landfill operations ever existing on MTF. Did an airport once operate within boundaries of MTF? The airport (referred to as Huntington Beach Airport) was to the northwest of MTF, adjacent to the west of Ascon, immediately south of a former Sewage Treatment Plant. Was MTF historically occupied by over 20 oil wells? Multiple historical sources confirm three oil wells were drilled at MTF in 1955 and abandoned in 1972. ROUX Presentation Guide 1. Historical Use of MTF • Pre-development • Post-development 2 Questions Related to MTF History Chemicals of Potential Concern for MTF • Crude oil (well drilling/oil production) • Fuel oil (ASTs) 4. Environmental Status of MTF • Regulatory Process (DTSC, HBFD, City) • Environmental Sampling Completed • Ascon Considerations 5 Questions Related to MTF Environm P.qe 14 3. Chemicals of Potential Concern at MTF Roux' Based on the history of MTF, chemicals of potential concern (COPCs) include crude oil (petroleum) and fuel oil. Petroleum (crude oil): Heavy; viscous: naturally occurring; common to Southern California and Huntington Beach. Can be associated with methane. Fuel Oil (aka, heavy oil/marine fuel): Heaviest commercial fuel that can be obtained from crude oil; dense; viscous; low volatility. �==� �III�I� ��;I� �I;+► tom; � _ ■ • a r Roux' Presentation Guide 1. Historical Use of MTF • Pre-development • Post-development Questions Related to MTF History Chemicals of Potential Concern for MTF Crude oil (well drilling/oil production) Fuel oil (ASTs) Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process (DTSC, HBFD, City) Environmental Sampling Completed • Ascon Considerations 5 Questions Related to MTF Environmental Status Page 16 Roux 4. Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process Department of Toxic Substances Control SCE responsible for assessment/cleanup MTF moving through a rigid regulatory process with DTSC Understand Site Develop Conceptual Identify Data Prepare RFI History Site Model Gaps Workplan Approval Paq,17 ROUX Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process Department of Toxic Substances Control Implement the Update Conceptual Identify if Data Prepare RFI RFI Workplan Site Model Gaps Closed Report Process continues until data gaps closed and DTSC satisfied P,J, 18 R� OUX. Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process Department of Toxic Substances Control DTSC required SCE to investigate environmental conditions at numerous generating stations, including HBGS SCE submits RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Workplan SCE implements the RFI Workplan SCE issues DRAFT RFI Report to DTSC DTSC & SCE trade comments on DRAFT RFI Report: Groundwater wells installed April/May 2018, samples collected 2018/2019 Workplan for additional soil sampling submitted March 2018/amended Dec 2018 Additional samples collected at MTF Late 201 Revised/Updated RFI Report (ROUX Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process Huntington Beach Fire Department AST demolition and removal. Workplans to HBFD for removal of hydrocarbon impacted soils beneath ASTs; HBDF approved. Removal of soils to 6-inches beneath three ASTs. Removal of oily soils from beneath piping and crude oil line at/near northern MTF boundary. HBFD issued NFA for AST removal and soils remediation. ROUX' Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process Huntington Beach Fire Department HBFD stated that: DTSC is lead agency to issue environmental closure for MTF: DTSC closure will independently ensure that impacts at MTF are less than significant for development; HBFD approvals will be required after DTSC closure for compliance with City Specification 431-92 (soil) and 429 (methane) Shopoff meetings with HBFD and its technical consultant to discuss specific requirements post-DTSC closure Shopoff Workplan to HBFD for additional sampling (as necessary and required) — after DTSC closure Oil well re-abandonments/design of methane barriers ROUX Environmental Status of MTF Regulatory Process City of Huntington Beach Requires completion of DTSC process; Requires State and local requirements be implemented for methane testing/mitigation and petroleum in soils; Requires DOGGR be consulted regarding historical oil wells and DOGGR requirements; and, Requires a Soil Management Plan for development. Pagc 22 1 • (Roux; Environmental Status of MTF Environmental Sampling Completed Comprehensive analytical results indicate conditions acceptable for residential development. Soil samples collected from more than 150 locations. Soil vapor samples collected from more than 20 locations. Groundwater samples collected from 10 locations. Additional sampling was conducted by SCE in June 2019 to close remaining data gaps. Page 23 [ROUX Environmental Status of MTF r{:•r:��\.v?\Pj�'' i;f .;5:�.:�X'.`}i:•}}:ti:Stiti•:':;:y1:4:"�' ' }:�% ''':•tom::: ROUX Environmental Status of MTF }.�:•:�:;:}tit{:•••::': ::�:$. Environmental Status of MTF Roux; Ascon Considerations Groundwater flows to north (from MTF to Ascon) Soil, soil gas, groundwater sampling along boundary shows no contamination from Ascon to MTF Ascon Final Remedy to include: Waste consolidation Engineered cap Landfill gas collection system Monitoring of soil gas and groundwater in perpetuity No complete exposure pathways PNii 2f 11/18/2019 Groundwater Flow (Aug & Septi I11I1 fI Y,.. --------- i bNOPOFF bRE\ _ W.utr n,r em. ., camv�q a,9•rnsxYw aanaxwra 0�0 •� ...<.v,v._. !gx•Mr]S.i01t FEET GRGUOMFUTR1N1 Rb ��__ -.-- - �.' =•A :�7�'''' -pm. ClOyl101t� Fpu, III TAIT �°'�` nu SISEvtE-2- _..__- ..."�'�'C�.'-6.�..� .4,�,.. ter.` T' ._.._.mmo".�sS... xwnircTa•°eu,°o°,°o..ron�n.. V �L Ca'+.a:0._. « Atlec�manll Mr mlq II - - III r I - NOT INN OONSTRUCTION 14 ROUX' Conceptual Site Model FENCE/PROPERTY LINE Groundwater Monitoring Well Groundwater Vj,JL) oil Monitoring Well FILL WASTE MATERIAL . Groundwater Surface CLAY Waste Material Clay GROUNDWATER GROUNDWATER <<< FLOW D RECTION <<< <<< FL W DI ECTION <<< ROUX Presentation Guide 1 Historical Use of MTF • Pre-development • Post-development 2. Questions Related to MTF History Chemicals of Potential Concern for MTF • Crude oil (well drilling/oil production) • Fuel oil (ASTs) 4 Environmental Status of MTF • Regulatory Process (DTSC, HBFD, City) • Work completed to date • Ascon Considerations Questions Related to MTF Environmental Status Pagc 30 Roux' 5. Questions on MTF Environmental Status Are chemicals historically used at MTF known and understood? Former oil field operations may have introduced petroleum to the shallow subsurface, consistent with regional historical activities. Fuel oil. a heavy, viscous petroleum hydrocarbon, was stored in three (3) 25 million-gallon AS Ts for use as a fuel source for power generation at HBGS. Engineered fill below the ASTs contained petroleum hydrocarbons. These materials were excavated and removed in 2017. Shallow petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soils were encountered below former piping; these impacted soils also were removed. P,q,r 71 Questions on MTF Environmental Status ROUX Has there been sufficient sampling at MTF to understand potential impacts and to determine if MTF can be safely developed into residential and commercial uses? There have been numerous soil, soil gas, and groundwater investigations conducted at MTF. SCE is completing the RFI, which will determine whether MTF can be issued closure or whether additional actions are needed. Closure frorn DTSC is expected in early 2020 after which HBFD requirements (conformance with City Specifications) will need to be met. Questions on MTF Environmental Status Roux' Will MTF development place health risks on current and future residents? DISC will not issue closure until all COPCs have been characterized and considered in the context of future residential and commercial development. Prior to allowing development, the City will require a formal closure letter from DTSC and conformance with City Specifications through HB FD. Finally, DTSC will require restriction in perpetuity on use of groundwater beneath MTF as a drinking water source. Pay,,33 ' Questions on MTF Environmental Status Roux Is there reason to believe that the future development at MTF will be impacted by Ascon? Numerous investigations have confirmed groundwater flows to north (from MTF to Ascon); and soil, soil gas, groundwater sampling along the boundary show no contamination from Ascon to MTF. Ascon's Final Remedy includes: waste consolidation; engineered cap; landfill gas collection; and monitoring of soil gas and groundwater— O&M will be in perpetuity. There are no complete exposure pathways. Page 34 Questions on MTF Environmental Status Roux' Is MTF known to share any of Ascon's toxic chemicals? Data from multiple rounds of soil, soil gas, and groundwater sampling along the northern boundary of MTF show no evidence of contamination from Ascon to MTF Groundwater flow direction is to the north and northeast, which is from MTF onto Ascon. Wastes at Ascon are known to have been placed into pits and lagoons, which would not readily allow for lateral migration in soils. Page 35 Questions on MTF Environmental Status Roux; Are there contingencies in the event soils impacted with COPCs are unexpectedly encountered at MTF during development? A Soil Management Plan is prescribed in the EIR for MTF. The SMP will include guidance concerning the proper monitoring, handling, segregation, stockpiling, dust control, testing, transport and disposal of potentially impacted soils, which may be encountered during future development activities. F,p ROUX Questions on MTF Environmental Status Is a former oil field pipeline that is present off-Site at the northern boundary with Ascon a possible source of contamination that could impact MTF? The pipeline was removed from MTF and cut at the northern boundary with Ascon in 2017. A limited volume of soil impacted by crude oil was removed with confirmation samples showing clean conditions. The pipeline is present beneath Ascon, Shopoff is working with DTSC and the HBFD to request that it be properly abandoned. � (R_ oux' Questions on MTF Environmental Status Is DTSC closure of MTF dependent on Ascon completion of their final remedy? MTF and Ascon are both under the oversight of the DTSC but are entirely independent from one another, including separate DTSC branches. Contamination from Ascon to MTF has been considered, studied, analyzed, and ruled out. Once the RFI and any needed remedy is completed to the satisfaction of DTSC. MTF will be issued a letter of closure. P,,,�8 Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 10:15 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Monday's City Council Agenda AGENDA COMMENT From:Steve Farnsworth<hazmn54@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2019 3:55 PM To:Chi, Oliver<oliver.chi@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Monday's City Council Agenda CIty Manager, Mayor and City Council Members, I respectfully ask that you remove this Magnolia Tank Farm Study Session from Monday's agenda and wait for the presentation to council on December 16th by the developers and let the project stand on it's own merits in the effort of transparency to the tax payers of Huntington Beach. Thank you, Steve Farnsworth SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:._ Agenda Item No.; #.� Ci�i- 55-2) Switzer, Donna From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 10:37 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm Study Session AGENDA COMMENT From: robin@blueprintsvmg.com <robin@blueprintsvmg.com> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 5:40 PM To: Chi, Oliver<oliver.chi@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm Study Session Hello, Please remove Magnolia Tank Farm Study Session from Monday's agenda. Not only is this a disastrous idea but the short notice is once again giving the appearance of deception and intentionally manipulating the timing to help the developers—NOT the citizens of Huntington Beach. Respectfully, Robin Brogdon, MA Blue Prints Veterinary Marketing Group, Inc. 0: 949.756.8071 C: 714.313.0621 robin blue printsvmg.com I blueprintsvmg.com *blueprints SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION k4eetng Date: ////,R/#-), Agenda Item No.' v2LJ #- , �A? 5>5z i Switzer, Donna From: Dombo,Johanna Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 10:37 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Study Session/Opposing AGENDA COMMENT From:vanessa martinez<rockonbaileybailey@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, November 14, 2019 5:17 PM To:Chi, Oliver<oliver.chi@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Study Session/Opposing Good Evening, Opposing the study session that was not set. Who is making this request?Why are things , suddenly just popping up without notice? Is this another opportunity for the developers to show boat? Thank you, Vanessa SWPPLIEMENT'AL COMMUNICATION I► g Date: li1-/8Zi9 Agenda rtem N.; -- �i sz) 1 Q��C OM�D November 161h, 2019 Huntington Beach Mayor Erik Peterson CITY COUNCIL OFFICE Mayor, City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Magnolia Tank Farm Development Mr. Mayor- Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Magnolia Tank Farm mixed use development. i I am writing this letter in support of the proposed Magnolia Tank Farm Development. I live in Huntington Beach and find this project to be a perfect fit for the surrounding community. Our city will benefit from the occupancy tax generated by this project and won't be harmed by a few additional folks using our streets. Thank you in advance for approving the Magnolia Tank Farm Development. Sincerel , i Peritem Signh I 16811 Pembrook- Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION iMee*V Date: Agenda Item No.: liYt� 7�2 I RECC YED November 1511, 2019 fiio v 8 10"D Huntington Beach Mayor Erik Peterson cirY cot�NCY� arr,c City of Huntington Beach # 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 Mayor Peterson- am writing regarding the Magnolia Tank Farm development. As a small business owner in Pacific City, foot traffic drives sales at my business. Bringing entertainment options to Southeast Huntington Beach will drive foot traffic that will help me bottom line. This project is a welcome addition to Huntington Beach and deserves our support. Please su the agnolia Tan ;ErmD2evelopment. Bes , Robert Leopardo Owner, Gelateria Zomolo 21022 Pacific Coast Hwy; Suite B110 HL!nting+..on Beach, CA 92648 I I 4 E k i i S'iUPPLF.MENTAL i 1 COMMUNICATION Meetlng Date: Agenda It m No. November 811, 2019 Erik Peterson Mayor iuiJ U tt%,(( City of Huntington Beach Huntington Bead) 2000 Main St. CIW COUNCIL OFFICE f Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Support- Magnolia Tank Farm Development i Mayor Peterson- Thank you in advance for your consideration of this project. am writing to express my support for the proposed Magnolia Tank Farm Development. I am a small business owner in Huntington Beach and know that this project will bring jobs and additional economic development to Southeast Huntington Beach. Bringing additional visitors and residents to Huntington Beach will help small business owners such as me as a result of the increased visitors. I humbly ask that you support the Magnolia Tank Farm Development when this issue comes before you. Truly, a Tien Vu 1969 Adams Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92626 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION M mft Date: Awwa ftm�. � Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:36 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm AGENDA COMMENT -----Original Message----- From: Phyllis Bailey<pbaileyhb@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 11:52 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm Please carefully planned what goes in to the Magnolia tank farm area on Magnolia. Our city is already so overcrowded and traffic is very annoying. Please consider Plans that will have the least environmental impact. I heard senior housing suggested and that is already zoned for that. Being a senior myself, I think we're going to need more of those pretty soon. Phyllis Bailey Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: ////8`/GI Agenda item No.; Aw t►',� Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 1:19 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Conflict of Interests Attachments: Conflicts-Guide-August-2015-Jan-2016-Edits 2019.pdf; Conflicts of Interest Rules 2019.html AGENDA COMMENT From: larry mcneely<Imwater@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 1:17 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Conflict of Interests As the Shopoff Tank Farm Project is closer to come before a city council vote I would like to interject the fact that at least one person on the city council has a clear Conflict of Interests with this vote. Barbara Delgleize owns and operates a local Real Estate Office in our city, by voting on this project this will bring into our local market 250 New Housing Units to our local market. This would be a win for profits for the real estate business and their staff and associates. The threshold for the conflict would surly be passed by the sale of one unit. I am calling for Barbara Delgleize to recuse her vote on this project to avoid any conflict or any other impropriety that may be considered. I have included my contact response from the FPPC on this issue. Thank You Larry Mc Neely SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeft Date: //La//eg Agenda item No.:61,E `�` Ste) 1 Fy � 3 52 ^+ i III I I r a 4 a� O p4 cn � V v U ° � CU PIZ uLM O � .P.4N U � a U a� o o bb 4.4 ;J 4� O O 4- cd O Ocn O s,+ d 4 o U o .o O ct a� � �, ° � v a' a .+� � 'rl 1-4 o r U VI bA r++ U 411 U O 44 zj C� bn o 4-1Cd 0 cn ^ OU U O w toCd bO U cn p bq d U �- d 00 Q Q, bbA U O Cd cd cd N N Cl. U O O N + O Q,'v U '. bA N Cam• .� —C8 Pi 7� � �'. as �° ,� .� � � 3 � � V � • � o � O � � Cd un +. .� F3 to cn u — 4a .r Cd Cd ^� cn U) O r 0 �� U Up m v c�6 QUA � U p O vi to c+-- ¢i ~ y •.�-� i � '++ 4- 'C? Cd 'd N U O O �' N � •� �� � � 'd cYn a� 41 411 0 0 � � O U �.d .L." can ,�p■■I 'a 'd �O Q" O cd s: iU ED U O � cd c v] O O V M-Cl p U +� •N. �.■� O �." d 4", d O Q bA p ■IV S"� cad p+ U p ■P.4 O m N cd 4S-r U ". N O U 0 +' cd 'r cd � � N p � O +, O N p 4 En .V) c� c+i ct3 En S r c�C O LU/] N �" t7 bA.O0 > p c •Z U C7 O O � Sao cn C ,s - w al y U J N 4.4 cd U U N O UO En O -- .-j O PE-1 CJ ct U cd N cd .,..4 o cn 4-4 O .�i bA bA10 a) rn cn En U r■ .� O y cC bA O cd OU �" rr�■.�■ O c m �+ G� � Cd U N ai ;CJ ?y Q� '�� O 4.0 �O+ s� •.. v� rU cn O 0 — o� N 0 O d U �Q" s-a U +�+ N C) 40, u o . � o O >, CD QU m Q, U °0 U U sU, rn 6F3 �3 ; CZ3 0 'd U ��+ O d N O U °bn ° N ran +4-' O p p cd v°i 14,� v4i = +U 42 'L3 cd 'c 'C3 +" 3 � U ° ° o 0 4° En a-+ cd U �U o bA cy U Q xl cn U 4- O 'p c;,, ci a U �� 4 . O O co OU _ p U cd .— 4�i 0 i••i O +, bA f-+ "" .., S�'i �y S-'•i �' .� ryi� ,�",�" cj +- s•. .� N N + dO O •� p 0� cad 41 2 UU" �Czl �' U ° U t-. U O OU U OU U 4r 'O O ^p 4) U U �" U U U N UGoa U "d cn p O O 0 4� cd cd tU-, +En � � 0i V '� 4� +� � � � VZ" � °U sU, cd mO C� OU O bpA �" N U 4-1 421 y N sU- O Ic +cn rn p U Lr U En o 71 cn Ed 4-4 'C3 O Cd Ci O U m 4z) N U +� �•, d � of o �Q 6" N � o r.. En CEnU 44- O 4-i cd �4� a� + cn cn U O O ti k Q1 cd Cd s En 4 E+ N O OCA s. N O O ~ U O O O N b p Z5 + OO O y~g (D ct O �+ O C41 O cd 's'" � cn + cd U , E C'J �. 1 m U ° to U j N c� p w . Cd toin 4-4 Ln cd tO Cd O O cd .'— Ep C p U y S y�g U cd r N y-{ 44 � cn 'C3 •cn N O U U O cd Gczs �� Q} .O � 4-4 N O U N cd U � N cd ° T3 } r 64 ul CA U2 yy O ° C3 ." U -O cd cd U V} U U ' cd i ;-4 (1) VAU CadIn ° ca cd s a G; .;-4 dj OU C.) L;� ,—, O cn cd ccd C.) a n s�-a ,-4 .� p cJ' �� O � U N U L�4 O �U i O ° Cad U ° w U U ��"r GO 4; r+ N R + 1 O + C7 bq cd �, s� -1 ct3 cd U ° cd .. O �, 'C €v 4 4 cn a CA 4-4 N O 0 .ri p En M bJ) Cd v ° oJ 0 ° in, O O C�3 x " cn U cn cnbQ ° o 3 o 0 Ct cncn U +U .-� "O U O U .��- N U U�+ 6> cd Ucn U cn En U d f ,U O 10H O U �, cn cn W ai a3 U Ui U U U '� UU O •Cd W Q a o Ln Q C,3 �� 0 U 'C,3 vUi U �" CC3 -4 3 N U ct3 4 ci 0 •" bU '" ° U ° p -rs o r o 0 0 0 -+� 15 v> —as cn C73 N c� G) U i U to +� N O N > O U S N W O ul ..cn bD 7a O 7C , ° C� Cd ,.,_ ..,..a. ,N . .,....:_• „, bU °q c Cd to as ° clCA cn i U UCA O 40 O O dcn al Z3 O ' Ln L4--, ail (D +r cd 3 o cn Cn c a o b°'n ° o o +- u ° 4-4 0 cd M r-+ V1 r cd Q Q. 0 N tD + Qr O U O R cd tn 4- 'Ell 4.1 Gd O W O cd y .O t" O cd O O U ¢' � O 4�1 7:1 O cid II cd cd M .r aj O O cd cn cn p dto j ++ N 4-4 i N— U �' En En cad •, 1 U 4� O cd O N In N pEn3 O Qr EA vv'i U O �r 7Ui Cd O ^n ° N a3c �" -� N ° cd V V rn '� 3 ai .N{ cd .fir •p �"+ . s. U O 44-4 � U •vi' s� �.i O +' U O O � 44 p u (D � i. cd O O + rn P1 t O -- Q" 4� d w°O -0 w d bnOW �, �� d � � p con O E- cd 0 _... _w._ VOl N O cl U +' O F' O O U cd U N Q F U cd o ^d U to U +' U Encn U 'd cn O f + O U � UcliNr cd O N rr s 'LS cd O bA cd ti, cd c'3 Cd O Cd �. r -c! .., cz 0 to cn O y C3 N F L p •- O cH •� O bo �r Q.. y N O O t� cd •� O i. .., 4-1 ~ O En Q. rn �+ N bA V N .� � � � �•�L .� � ice. � 'r~..� U .� ,�' N � .�' N � � � •.�i En CD a-.+ N s, w w i 'E3 U O cz CU U z . ... _w...� _....., u:, •W• � IA ' W ^+ Tf U W .�71 ct _ r vCd cd + N 41 cd � co cd (D Q) clj �, CdU U O p cd 0 bq a > •� O O cl� • �. . , , cd bA . +, c d bAcd v 5z+p cn > O cd l., � pp y va N +, 4-1 cn 10 •-p +� � .� dA,_, 4� � O cam, cn •" U 'v� -" �, � O N cad > U N Cd bA cd U sa-) Q" >, t 0 +� cn -ri 1-4 cd cli N �" > U ,U U N '� vUi O 1 bA dEn Lt � bA v N 1 Z" s , � .r N c Ur U d U U cd i r U Ici Cd O cd -M O U .fir U 'r 4� Vb V2 .- __.... W. _...,.. - � o 03 ram+ Y�I N cd w Q, cn 1-0 t4 N cd 7� N -- p NO N cn O O € o .ON00 4'' cd 73 a cd O O cl14 00 y ( cd -- r14, , 'L00 O 1 O i U Un 4-4 cad 0 O �bb � Lt tb Ln 4-1 cd 4-4 Cd Off"., p �-+ •"' � N �. UCd NO 00 w �"r �Cc cd Q cd ;Cl Q. S" �. y O C3 ++ a1 00 O U cd bA bD cd O U U .O '� Cd } 3 N 'Gy". Q, U Cd 24 bA ^3 0 as O~ n O + N C�jCd (D cd 7� O U p Ct � s � 4* cu w •� 8 y Cj al p as z a� U U Cd 0 Cd f Cd '4 cdLn cn cl N N En cdcd Cd O a U bn U . W U O O cCCd N c� d)cn VI N �" bn cu � � U ? is o 0 cd Z - i U +� cz W t, O O UU+ 4r cQ O U Cd O � ( il •U ��.vl � O i-1 '.1 � � /O/) �^ p •i�--11 1�_WII .rry n �y > ^-1 to u Lt sU. •d jU, y Ss,.� "'" L=. •r' O 'CS ~ O p bbD •"� p � `V `ti � 'f"� V�-I a /VI/1 O � 1-1 Q, Q� � i'V1-yl 00 4ti i rl cd (D `v r�-1 p T a. ;' cn 4.1 ,L� "' O ate, 'ri 4� O —, Cd -� U U �^ b0 Cd O '�ID cd ^fl ` Ncn N Q N U V s CIA ( .cl� 4 i .14 O cd r, Cd44 Q) Cd CdIn cd �, °? •.. + o x � U N a H v1 p y M"1 N ICA 'C? +� cd O � � + En OU bo Cd O ¢ 0 0 •.. U N t3, U O �, "U" �� cd V N Cd u U U o ° O cn -d o ate , 7y 4i 0 U OU m Q, cd to to Cd to O ,a ram— " cd U N 00 0003 � O � cd C3' ¢� bA "mod .° N O W cd V) f bA O — CSC d O VV i•N Vi O O P.4 bUA - ° by 4-a 'U b +F+ 4 O v� U ° :3 is 44-4 � O U) N 0 U p U) — E_ Z p Q om' Cj W o ° U W C, " bq as Ln to cd 7 cn V d] �, O cn „� ^� U� by vi ° to U .�-i •U ..ui ,� � am•C 6'� C ,'� rr. am., O cd cn +�- ,,,yy V .•. N U O O Q b°n O Cd O ul U 4-1 co Cd cd U O Cd O cd � > ID ¢, bA n v Cd 0 cd 03 t. bbb y U O .Ut", rn .0 N U p U cd ( '� U cn r� "O N U Obp U ° + U. 0 0 C N > ��. N N O rn p O 'i 'p j cd .f; 44 N U) U _O E••� O O O O N+ y 4i (D O O ID � � � U) N N cd U C,3 O .O �' O U � U O ID bU U p U +s: 4�' U (D U N " +" s, bb ID ��•r. Cd N cd ° �+ U , cd to Cd U rl 4-1 ul Cd Cd >,c i -d Q, O ° 'C �' 0 U V� cd Q, s� to bUA ° O Cd O a' 3 fs" cd Cd o °' o o U °Cd cd r4 bA � p . y Op �bD Cd 4- d U U bA U 1-4N cd U 4� 4 "�c� 70.E 41 U U cd r'' 7O U �~ H N U Cd o cd - O } O ! O CO cd O N p s U p p¢ •- ,O o cd is , cd >, N . sm, O cd , U o ++1 vi 4 Q ^ O i� �• .fl ul _Cd O N R3 O ti U 9" can+ cd cd cd Ln —, N V M v s U �+ cd to p bio tn 4-4 cn 4. aj U � 0 t7 r. ct a> =1 N O y ct N � � cn cn N C OQ' av� U d o o � !� .ems-, � � '�' � � ■.Ly s '� ',r'"+ � " v' cn Cd cn to '. O s0-i O � O em-I w n� 'd U _O bb O N N ZH cd v; �+ O 41, 4-4 � bo 4�5 N m N -ate' = `� N O fl O N U ° ° 3 � U O ct -v 3 � V) CD cn cn O 0000 ,o � o a.•�, o � ° � U � �, w cn o ° � ° Q, ° o O O 03 cdU. s U 'C O ,� U ,O � 4r •� �" y y O 'Cq �cn OrA —c,2 ° o C U NPr 00 ? C cn Cd N O� C Cj U Qsue, 'C ul Q. +' cad Q "C OU cd n Cam- rU cd p U cd 00 U cad -0 O O 'Cd N CAM M� cn cd N N 9 N N N N N M d O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 U O bA F4 y 4 o rA o0 00 00 o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 44 o •° U ° 00 o O o 0 o O o O o O p O O 00 � N M �' M O c y ad c Ly d 4 �p cad p U cd +�. O N M t C U w w by ' bA w to by to to bA cd o0 °° °° oo 00 " ° 00 00 00 00 S �." N N U cd U N U N N U U o0 Ov Con co-,col) �- cm coy c ^� o m n n ao a o N m a �n o '�'. .0 0 r- Cd U Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 2:15 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Shopoff EIR AGENDA COMMENT From: larry mcneely<Imwater@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 1:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Shopoff EIR I along with many others in our community are disappointed in the planning commission approval for this project. It looked to me this approval was a foregone conclusion before the meeting ever started. This project looks to be green lighted by the city staff and the direction of the meeting was swayed by this support. While there were many reasons to deny this project one stands out, our own requirement that building and development restrictions apply being next to a Toxic site as Mr Ray pointed out. It was no surprise that the benefactors of the Shopoff money and influence were going to vote in favor. Shopoff has rewarded Barbara Delgleize , Michael Posey and Patrick Brenden with campaign donations and the HB Chamber of Commerce PAC money. The developers have made promises "quid pro quo" of the area improvements to further sway the vote. This project should be denied there is no public benefit beyond the developers bribes. My count of the public comments are 10 people who support this project 22 who opposed this project and 8 shills brought in from outside our city to support this project(not counting the emails and letters). It was clear that Posey Delgleize and Brenden made every effort to stack the deck in their favor with these people (shills) who do not live here and a few that are not effected. Our own HB Chamber of Commerce Developers and Special Interests Lobbying group came to support this project my question did this Chamber take a vote of its members ?when a businesses joins the chamber to network are they giving a go ahead to them to support projects that they may not agree with ? It is clear to me this decision was bought and paid for by the developer and the public will was ignored. Yes the Shopoff money bought you votes but the public and the community are the ones who voted listen to them. No monster development on the banks of our protected wetlands we need open areas and open skylines and this Toxic site next door will continue to cause harm and potential Law Suites in the future history has proved this. I am counting on the few who have not been bought by the developers and to Deny this project when it comes before you for a vote. Thank You Larry Mc Neely SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Agenda Iter,No., ss-#a2 t/g— 352) Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 8:07 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty AGENDA COMMENT From: Kate Bonnevie <skbonnevie@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 9:26 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty Dear HB Council members Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. I am a 35 year SEHB Resident, having grown up here as a kid and now raising my own family here in SE Huntington. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project. It is simply unconscionable! Putting homes and families next to one of the most toxic dumps in Ca is repugnant. Don't be a bunch of sellouts! Stop the trend. These developers don't care about our community - health, environmental impacts, quality of life - it's all bottom-line. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Vote "no" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. We're paying attention to this next vote. Regards, Kate Bonnevie 19661 Waterbury Lane Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 SUPPLEMENTAL 714-323-3849 COMMUNICATION Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone Meeding Date. Agenda Item No.: #Z 1 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 8:12 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Proposed zone change AGENDA COMMENT From: mark grundman<fyregy@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 9:33 PM SUPPLEMENTAL To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> COMMUNICATION Subject: Proposed zone change Meetlng DOW: Agenda Kem No.. o• Dear Councilperson, Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. My name is Mark Grundman and I'm a resident of Huntington Beach. I am a retired Fire Chief with 36 years of fire service. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I oppose this project 100 percent and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project for the following reasons: Proper preparation has not been accomplished. Smoke and mirrors have been presented as truths. Proper sampling has NOT been completed. See Huntington Beach Fire Department recommendation. You pay them for a reason, please act on their recommendations. There is NO WAY the land adjacent to ASCON is safe for people to occupy. A 3-story"lodge", requiring 3000 piles driven into the ground to build, next to fragile, toxic waste pits - is unsafe, unsightly, and unacceptable in its location across the street from Edison High School. Over 250 medium density homes do not belong just feet from a noisy, pollution-generating power plant; nor should innocent families be sold a home adjacent to one of the most toxic landfills in California. There is off- gassing of chemicals and chemical migration underneath the soil that will never be resolved. Soil gases will put these families in extreme danger of toxic exposures and resulting diseases. In addition, Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM10 pollution, at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens - our children. The traffic and parking issues of this project are beyond mitigation and have NOT been properly assessed. 1 The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Please, vote"NO" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! Your Neighbor, Mark Grundman 20401 Meander Lane Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 714-272-6966 Fyregy(&yahoo.com Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone 2 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 8:13 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: No on tank farm AGENDA COMMENT From:jell gr<grimmlon@yahoo.com> SUPPLEMENTAL Sent:Thursday,October 24, 2019 6:55 PM COMMUNICATION To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: No on tank farm Modng Date: Agenda Item No.._�-#z l /,:�7 S� Dear Councilperson, Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. I am a California Land Surveyor. And have lived in SE HB for over. 7 years. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project for the following reasons: (Delete, add, expand, rephrase as needed) A 3-story"lodge", requiring 3000 piles driven into the ground to build, next to fragile, toxic waste pits - is unsafe, unsightly, and unacceptable in its location across the street from Edison High School. Over 250 medium density homes do not belong just feet from a noisy, pollution-generating power plant; nor should innocent families be sold a home adjacent to one of the most toxic landfills in California. There is off- gassing of chemicals and chemical migration underneath the soil that will never be resolved. Soil gases will put these families in extreme danger of toxic exposures and resulting diseases. In addition, Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM 10 pollution, at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens - our children. The traffic and parking issues of this project are beyond mitigation. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Please, vote "no"on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! Your Neighbor, Jeffrey Grimm i 8722 Hatteras Dr HB 92646 Grimm l on(a,yahoo.com Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 2 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 8:14 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm and Shopoff Realty Project AGENDA COMMENT From: bbarriol<bbarriol@verizon.net> Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 6:26 PM SUPPLEMENTAL To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> COMMUNICATION Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm and Shopoff Realty Project Meet%Date:_ Dear Councilperson, Agenda Item No.: Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. My name is Bonnie Barrio. I have been a resident of Huntington Beach for 26 years. I live a mile and a half from this site. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project for the following reasons: A 3-story "lodge", requiring 3000 piles driven into the ground to build, next to fragile, toxic waste pits - is unsafe, unsightly, and unacceptable in its location across the street from Edison High School. Over 250 medium density homes do not belong just feet from a noisy, pollution-generating power plant; nor should innocent families be sold a home adjacent to one of the most toxic landfills in California. There is off- gassing of chemicals and chemical migration underneath the soil that will never be resolved. Soil gases will put these families in extreme danger of toxic exposures and resulting diseases. In addition, Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM10 pollution, at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens - our children. The traffic and parking issues of this project are beyond mitigation. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Please, vote "no" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! i Bonnie and Robert Barrio 8532 Masters Drive Huntington Beach Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S9,an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone 2 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 7:51 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm Importance: High AGENDA COMMENT From:Gary Tarkington <garytarkington@msn.com> Sent:Sunday, October 27, 2019 7:19 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm Importance: High Dear Councilperson, Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. My name is Ann Tarkington. I am a long time resident. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project for the following reasons: A 3-story"lodge", requiring 3000 piles driven into the ground to build, next to fragile, toxic waste pits - is unsafe, unsightly, and unacceptable in its location across the street from Edison High School. Over 250 medium density homes do not belong just feet from a noisy, pollution-generating power plant; nor should innocent families be sold a home adjacent to one of the most toxic landfills in California. There is off-gassing of chemicals and chemical migration underneath the soil that will never be resolved. Soil gases will put these families in extreme danger of toxic exposures and resulting diseases. In addition, Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM10 pollution, at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens- our children. The traffic and parking issues of this project are beyond mitigation. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Please, vote "no" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! Your Neighbor, Ann Tarkington 9032 Annik Drive Huntington Beach, 92646 _ga arkington(Wmsn.com SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Me*V gate: /I 9 Agenda Item No.;_L .2 1 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:19 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Farm/Shopoff Development AGENDA COMMENT -----Original Message----- From: Helen Vals<yellowluke@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2019 4:15 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Farm/Shopoff Development Council Members, My family home is one street over from Magnolia just below Banning. All of the planned development on the top of a toxic waste site seems like great potential for future law suits for the City of Huntington Beach. The best use of that site would be a park. We have no park for our community. We have enough housing and traffic. Our neighborhood has become a beach parking lot. Enough is enough. We are in opposition to this development! Helen Valsamakis Marina Valsamakis x Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mea&V Date: Agenda Item No,, Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:19 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm SUPPLEMENTAL. AGENDA COMMENT COMMUNICATION l oeb:�...�(�/SlI�l From: Richard Schnur<rhschnur@aol.com> Sent: Saturday,October 26, 2019 11:11 AM AgfWs hwn 14o.- c'�S#2 /,— To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Fwd: Magnolia Tank Farm As a resident adjacent to all the construction and planned construction in the tank farm area please STOP any new building in this area. Clean up the mess first. Our environment is compromised. Richard Schnur Begin forwarded message: From: Mark Dixon<ncsmt20l42gmail.com> Date: October 26, 2019 at 10:57:13 AM PDT To: City.counciI61surfcity-hb.org Cc: editor&latines.com Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm Dear members of the Huntington Beach City Council: Enough! South of Hamilton between Newland and Brookhurst contains an extremely high concentration of high-volume industrial activity. This area also contains the largest concentration of toxic waste in Surf City. This affects the environment upon which citizens live, from the very young to the very old. Seepage under the Ascon fence is already measureable and unless it is properly managed it will affect the residents of the tank farm project if it is approved. I'm not against development of our beautiful city, but I will strongly oppose development adjacent to and on top of harmful toxic waste. Please consider the health and well-being of current and future residents by blocking development of the Magnolia Tank Farm until public safety is ensured. Please, also consider the extreme noise pollution from AES and the proposed Poseidon plant. In addition, I have equal concern for increased traffic in a school zone and surrounding area, and the noise from an additional 300 or so residents and vehicles in an already densely populated area. Respectfully, i Mark W. Dixon 21612 Bahama Lane Huntington Beach CA 92646 714-394-0075 MWD 2 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:20 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm AGENDA COMMENT SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION From: Mark Dixon<ncsmt2014@gmail.com> Mee"Date. Sent:Saturday, October 26, 2019 10:57 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: editor@latines.com Agenft tt8h1 Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm ' Dear members of the Huntington Beach City Council: Enough! South of Hamilton between Newland and Brookhurst contains an extremely high concentration of high-volume industrial activity. This area also contains the largest concentration of toxic waste in Surf City. This affects the environment upon which citizens live, from the very young to the very old. Seepage under the Ascon fence is already measureable and unless it is properly managed it will affect the residents of the tank farm project if it is approved. I'm not against development of our beautiful city, but I will strongly oppose development adjacent to and on top of harmful toxic waste. Please consider the health and well-being of current and future residents by blocking development of the Magnolia Tank Farm until public safety is ensured. Please, also consider the extreme noise pollution from AES and the proposed Poseidon plant. In addition, I have equal concern for increased traffic in a school zone and surrounding area, and the noise from an additional 300 or so residents and vehicles in an already densely populated area. Respectfully, Mark W. Dixon 21612 Bahama Lane Huntington Beach CA 92646 714-394-0075 MWD i Es arza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:36 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FK Shopoff AGENDA COMMENT From: Sandra F<sandyfazio@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 4:26 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Shopoff Dear City Council: As a resident of SEHB I feel like our area has been labeled as a throwaway area. We already have so much commercial activity here whats one more and one more and one more thing. City Council members have given away our neighborhood to Poseidon and Shopoff as we are asked to put up with Ascon and AES. And by the way....your complaints mean nothing. I thought Huntington Beach was better than that. Sandra Fazio 21612 Bahama Ln, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714 272 5065 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeftg Deb: Agenda Item► O.:— ( m Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 7:58 AM To: Agenda Comment; De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Please stop the Magnolia tank farm project AGENDA COMMENT From:tpolkow<tpolkow@mindspring.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 23, 2019 6:59 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Please stop the Magnolia tank farm project My name's Tom Polkow, I live at 21772 Oceanview Lane Huntington Beach. Been a resident of Huntington Beach since 1970. I fully support Poseidon and the new AES plant, but building housing and retail on the tank farm at Magnolia is insane!. That property is industrial and should stay Industrial! It also takes a quiet corner of Huntington Beach and will impose all kinds of added traffic and noise, which will make the quality of living in this area drop precipitously. You folks should know when to stop... you can't build high-density on every single piece of property that pops up! Especially long time industrial property that has been subject to toxic activity for many many decades. And who in their right mind would want to buy a home right next to a giant power plant and desalination plant? So please reconsider this foolish, greedy move, and stop the Magnolia Tank Farm Project! Thank you, Tom Polkow 949-230-6710 Sent from my Verizon,Samsung Galaxy smartphone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mae"Date: Agenda Item No., Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 7:59 AM To: Agenda Comment; De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Concerned citizen 2 AGENDA COMMENT From: christine zeutzius<cz3boys@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 23, 2019 8:26 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:Christine Zeutzius<cz3boys@gmail.com> Subject:Concerned citizen 2 Dear City Council Members, My name is Christine Zeutzius and I'm a 20 year, South Huntington Beach homeowner and resident. I'm also a 2nd grade teacher at Hawes Elementary School and our three boys attend Sowers Middle School and Edison High School. Since every part of my family's day is spent in South Huntington, I've been listening intently to all the information(and lack of information) coming from the Tank Farm/Shopoff Project. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. You know what is at stake. Please take a moment to ask yourself these honest questions. Would you desire to live next to this projector have your children attend a school across the street? Would you chose to move into the neighborhoods that border this project? If your answer is emphatically NO, then I urge you to vote "no" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. It's time to protect South Huntington's present and future. We are all hopeful...and intently watching. Christine Zeutzius 20381 Ravenwood Ln HB CA 92646 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION meftV — � Agenda Item No.- /G1 ) 1 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 8:06 AM To: Agenda Comment; De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. VOTE NO AGENDA COMMENT From: Mary<mary.ransbury@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 23, 2019 7:52 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification.VOTE NO Dear Councilperson, Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. My name is Mary Ransbury and I have lived in HB for over 18 years. I have worked as an RNfor Huntington Beach Hospital, have worked as a CCOO for the only community trauma center along with many other hospitals in the surrounding area. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well,when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project for the following reasons: (Delete, add, expand, rephrase as needed) A 3-story"lodge",requiring 3000 piles driven into the ground to build,next to fragile,toxic waste pits-is unsafe,unsightly, and unacceptable in its location across the street from Edison High School. Over 250 medium density homes do not belong just feet from a noisy, pollution-generating power plant;nor should innocent families be sold a home adjacent to one of the most toxic landfills in California. There is off-gassing of chemicals and chemical migration underneath the soil that will never be resolved. Soil gases will put these families in extreme danger of toxic exposures and resulting diseases. In addition,Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM10 pollution,at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens-our children. The traffic and parking issues of this project are beyond mitigation. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Please,vote"no"on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! Your Neighbor, 908 Pecan Ave HB 92648 Regards Mary Ransbury 714.580.8458 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: N// 2 Agenda lUn NO.' �- /9— Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 8:43 AM To: Agenda Comment; De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm AGENDA COMMENT SUPPLEMENTAL From: Pat Riley<patrileys.com@gmail.com> COMMUNICATION Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 8:35 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Meeft Date:_ ��/� jig Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm Agenda hem No.• 4 Dear Councilperson, Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. My name is Pat Riley. Our family has lived Hula Circle next to the corner of Banning and Magnolia since 1978. I am now here caring for my elderly Mother. I'm a singer-songwriter, global health advocate and a former health education specialist. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project for the following reasons: 1. Increased traffic congestion 2. Industrial noise pollution effects on all neighboring residents 3. Toxic environment Ascon health hazards 4. This area doesn't need another bar, restaurant, shopping, nor does Orange County need any more homes. Sorry. Aren't there enough people in Orange County already? Really. Do we want Huntington Beach to look like San Francisco? Hello!!!!! 5. Threats of HB class action lawsuits due to unexpected health consequences 6. It would be better off as a affordable overflow beach parking lot for welcome visitors to the coast. This way they wouldn't have to park in our local neighborhoods. Another option would be to plant tall trees as a sound barrier and air cleaner. Green space. *Everything should not be about making more money. In addition, Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM 10 pollution, at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens - our children. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill plus the potential of a Poseidon plant. Please, vote "no" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! Your Neighbor, Pat Riley 22042 Hula Circle Huntington Beach California 92646 615-397-0297 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 11:24 AM To: De Coite, Kim; Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm AGENDA COMMENT SUPPLEMENTAL -----Original Message----- COMMUNICATION From: stephanie stichka<stephanie.stichka@gmail.com> Meeting Data:_ 1lliglIq Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 11:15 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm Agenda Rom No.• 52 Dear Councilperson, Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. I am a lifelong HB resident, wife, and mother of two young kids so this issue hits close to home for me. I want my kids to thrive and prosper in a healthy environment. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well,when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. A 3-story"lodge", requiring 3000 piles driven into the ground to build, next to fragile,toxic waste pits- is unsafe, unsightly, and unacceptable in its location across the street from Edison High School. Over 250 medium density homes do not belong just feet from a noisy, pollution-generating power plant; nor should innocent families be sold a home adjacent to one of the most toxic landfills in California. There is off-gassing of chemicals and chemical migration underneath the soil that will never be resolved. Soil gases will put these families in extreme danger of toxic exposures and resulting diseases. In addition, Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM10 pollution, at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens-our children. The traffic and parking issues of this project are beyond mitigation. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Please,vote "no" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! Your Neighbor, Stephanie Stichka 8371 Castilian Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Esparza, Patty From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 11:56 AM To: De Coite, Kim; Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Planning Commission SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA COMMENT COMMUNICATION From:Carole Riggs<cocoriggs50@gmail.com> Meeft Date._ 11 11,51J Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 11:51 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Agende t1lem No.• -Z 1q- ? 2 Dear Councilperson, Thank you for your service to Huntington Beach. My name is Carole Riggs, I'm a 45 year resident of Huntington Beach. I raised my three children here, my youngest graduated from Edison High School. I was diagnosed with Apical Pleural Thickening on August 4th of this year. I believe due to inhaling contaminets from the remediation that began in January at the Ascon dump site. I am extremely concerned that the appointed Planning Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending Magnolia Tank Farm/Shopoff Realty project's EIR certification. I vehemently oppose this project and ask that you do so as well, when this project comes before you on December 16 for adoption. I stand against this project for the following reasons: A 3-story "lodge", requiring 3000 piles driven into the ground to build, next to fragile, toxic waste pits - is unsafe, unsightly, and unacceptable in its location across the street from Edison High School. Over 250 medium density homes do not belong just feet from a noisy, pollution-generating power plant; nor should innocent families be sold a home adjacent to one of the most toxic landfills in California. There is off- gassing of chemicals and chemical migration underneath the soil that will never be resolved. Soil gases will put these families in extreme danger of toxic exposures and resulting diseases. In addition, Eader Elementary School already experiences high levels of PM10 pollution, at times to unhealthy levels. This project will further raise pollution for our most fragile citizens - our children. The traffic and parking issues of this project are beyond mitigation. The residents of South Huntington Beach bear more than their share of air, soil and noise pollution, due to the AES power plant and the Ascon Landfill. Please, vote "no" on the Magnolia Tank Farm Project. Protect our precious community! Your Neighbor, Carole Riggs 21851 Newman's #290 Huntington Beach 92646 714 2749742 i Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:21 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farn vote AGENDA COMMENT From: MARY JULIENNE<mjsfishstick@msn.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:15 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.com mission @surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm vote City planners and council, You represent the entire city of Huntington Beach and need to vote against the Magnolia Tank Farm project. This project is separated from the toxic Ascon landfill by a chain link fence. This land has been continually flooded with toxic Ascon runoff and chemical vapors which will continue past cleanoff for decades just like Love Canal. This project is located in flood, earthquake liquefaction and methane-releasing zones and backs up to the protected wetlands which were only recently recovered from years of neglect and artificial drying out. Your NO vote will ensure that Love Canal does not occur again making the city of Huntington Beach liable for billion dollar litigation in damages and loss of life adding homes and hotel to the toxic swamp. DO NOT REZONE! Voters are watching you and your response to this ill fated attempt by Shopoff. VOTE NOH! Mary & Don Julienne 21172 Poston Lane SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION MWft Date:,,,,,, Agenda Item NO.' 05WZ Nq- z Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:03 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Tank farm AGENDA COMMENT -----Original Message----- From: Kathleen Brown <heykathybrown@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:01 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Tank farm Please vote to DENY until completely remediate.Too much risk until then. No harm in waiting. Thank you! Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date• Agenda Item No.;_ l L-� � Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 2:17 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Magnolia Tank Farm / Hopeful cooler heads and a well thought out actionable plan are in our future Attachments: Letter to HB City Leaders from David Wetzel.pages a PL TAL C,01MM JNIGATI®N AGENDA COMMENT Ming Dater:_'//LI F//7 From: David Wetzel <davidwwetzel@gmail.com> �' Agenda Ite,t�> 550-Z L�- 2 Sent:Thursday, October 17, 2019 2:14 PM � y...�,.�.�r To: Peterson, Erik<Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Semeta, Lyn <Lyn.Semeta@surfcity-hb.org>; Brenden, Patrick <Patrick.Brenden@surfcity-hb.org>; Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Hardy,Jill <Jill.Hardy@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity- hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; Ramos, Ricky<rramos@surfcity-hb.org>; Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Magnolia Tank Farm/ Hopeful cooler heads and a well thought out actionable plan are in our future October 16th, 2019 RE: Magnolia Tank Farm Dear Huntington Beach Planning Commission Members, City Council, and staff, My name is David Wetzel and I have lived in Huntington Beach for 53 years, attending Eader, Gisler(Sowers)and Edison as a child, proudly putting our kids through those same schools. We have seen Huntington Beach evolve first hand over the years, sometimes struggling, often times rising to the occasion. I feel strongly the proposed new development,the Magnolia Tank Farm, is one of those moments we will look back on as a crossroads, proud we spoke up in favor of the project. I would like the Tank Farm project to be successful as a part of the Southeast Huntington Beach community. I would like to see the benefits of this project come to fruition to the betterment of our community. The benefits far outweigh the short term inconveniences. For the record, a few very outspoken individuals in our neighborhood do not speak for the more than 400-plus households in our our corner of HB, let alone the more than 200,000 residents of the city. The majority of the residents in our Southeast corner of HB are very aware of the continued social media rhetoric being shared, but simply wish not to be singled out for disagreement. It is sad reality of social media. Please be aware of this trend. I understand that the Coastal Commission and the city's LCP requires the Magnolia Tank Farm development to provide visitor-serving uses. Given a choice, I feel an all residential final plan would be a best fit for our area. If that is not an viable final plan, I would support the small low profile boutique hotel that I have seen in conceptual drawings. The boutique hotel and local visitor guest access would be a compliment to our area and serve as a local meeting and gather location(coffee shop, restaurant/bar, etc). I am aware the proposed Magnolia Tank Farm project would require zoning changes to this area. I would support those changes. My understanding,the property is currently zoned for Public use,which could entail the plausible construction of a senior living campus or similar. This would not compliment to our area. Knowing the land is privately owned, I am certain something will be build there. Hopeful to encourage good choices by our HB leadership, I am writing this note, to ensure the majorities voice is being heard. We know there are issues in our area that are being addressed,ASCON,AES, Poisidon and Magnolia Tank Farm. They are independent issues that have been lumped together to create an unrealistic environment for any meaningful progress to be made. I would encourage our HB Planning Commission and City Council to weed through the emotional grandstanding and simply look at the facts and science. The wasted time and funds to bring these projects to completion is unto itself a lesson in deferring the responsibility to move forward. I feel strongly the Tank Farm project would be benefit to our are and hopeful you will agree to approve the plans as presented. Thank you for the gift of your time, David Wetzel 1 Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 7:54 AM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: No Tank Farm AGENDA COMMENT From: robin@blueprintsvmg.com <robin@blueprintsvmg.com> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 5:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: No Tank Farm Hello, Please, I implore you, do not approve the Tank Farm/Shopoff project. 1. It is simply not safe. 2. Mr.Shopoff is a criminal and ethically challenged. 3. Do you really want to stake your name on this proposed project? I live on Adelia Circle (across the street from the big tent) and have endured too many'projects' in SE HB.This is not good for our community and detrimental to everyone's health. Thank you. Robin Brogdon, MA BluePrints Veterinary Marketing Group, Inc. 0: 949.756.8071 C: 714.313.0621 robin@blueprintsvmg.com I blueprintsvmg.com *blue SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 11!1.�[ �l� Agenda Item NO.;_ 02 ( /�- F52) Estanislau, Robin From: Dombo, Johanna Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2019 1:42 PM To: Agenda Comment Cc: Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL Subject: FW: Votes on the Shopoff Tank Farm Developments. AGENDA COMMENT From: larry mcneely<Imwater@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 09, 2019 1:34 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Votes on the Shopoff Tank Farm Developments. As the votes come forward to our city council on the Shopoff Tank Farm Development. I think its time to raise the question of Conflict of Interests. Our City Council Member Barbara Delgleize has a clear Conflict of Interests in this project she is a local Realtor and has her office located in our city. Barbara Delgleize must Recuse from voting on this project as her conflict is clear by voting on this project would allow the addition of 250 Housing Units to the inventory of homes for sale in our city, this will benefit Barbara Delgleize personally and unduly benefit her Business , Staff and her Pocket Book. I ask that this be brought to our City Attorney for a opinion. If this vote is allowed to be made without Recuse this will be challenged as a violation of Conflict of Interests Laws. As many of you are aware the Shopoff Development has tried in many ways to stack the deck in his favor by making campaign donations and joining PACs to influence our elections. Shopoff has further made efforts to buy influence by making statements to agree to Pay for the Edison HS Pool Remodel. I think its time that we realize that we must end the Pay for Play and the Quid Pro Que effects it has had on our decision makers.TIME FOR CHANGE. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meetitsg Date:_ !/I J,F//q Agenda I>hetn No.: