Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApprove Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 - Resoluti �tPPRo✓� -7-c City of Huntington Beach File #: 21-804 MEETING DATE: 11/2/2021 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Oliver Chi, City Manager PREPARED BY: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development Subject: Adopt Ordinance No. 4236 approving Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 (Gisler Residential - 21141 Strathmoor Lane) - Approved for introduction 10119/2021. Vote: 6-0-1 (Peterson-Absent) Statement of Issue: Ordinance No. 4236 approved for introduction on October 19, 2021 , requires adoption. Financial Impact: As a result of the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 19136 and Conditional Use Permit No. 20-024, the applicant will submit a $250,000 community benefit contribution to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The funds will be retained for two years until the Huntington Beach City School District (HBCSD) is ready to use the funds for a sports field lighting project on HBCSD property. The City will have the right to use the funds for another community benefit project if the HBCSD does not complete the lighting project within two years of City Council approval of the project. Recommended Action: Adopt Ordinance No. 4236, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to Rezone the Real Property Located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) (Zoning Map Amendment No. 20- 002 )" (Attachment No. 3) Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1 . Deny Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002. General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002. 2. Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002. General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 and direct staff accordingly. City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 5 Pnrted on '0 272021 1642 File #: 21-804 MEETING DATE: 11/2/2021 Analysis: A. PROPOJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Derek Spalding, Brookfield Residential, 3200 Park Center Drive, Suite 1000, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Property Owner: Huntington Beach City School District, 8750 Dorsett Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 The project includes the folloxvim, requests: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 20-002 - To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic (R(underlyi Densi ng Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low q� L). 7_0611g Map Amendment (ZMA)CIO. 20-002 - To amend the zoning desiunation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No_ 20-002 - To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposed GPA, ZMA, and MND are prerequisites to allow the applicant to subdivide and redevelop the approximately 13.9 gross acre former Gisler School site into 85 two story single-family residences (Attachment No. 6). The project also includes Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 19136 to subdivide the site into a Planned Unit Development (PUD) project with 8.5 single family residential numbered lots with reduced size and width and 16 lettered lots for private streets, open space, and landscaping and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 20- 024 to allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6-foot tall wall/fence. The Planning Commission approved the TTM and CUI' on September 28, 2021- No appeal ol'the Planning Commission's approval of the "171A1 and CUP was filed within the 10-day appeal period that ended on October 8, 2021. The September 28, 2021 Planning Commission staff report provides it more detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project (Attachment No. 4). B. BACKGROUND: Gisler Middle School operated from 1973 to 1986. Subsequently, Brethren Christian School entered into a lease in 2001 and operated at the site until ,tune 2019. On October 15, 2019, the Board of Trustees of the Huntington Beach City School District adopted a resolution declaring the school as surplus property with the intent to sell. Brookfield Residential submitted the winning bid and entered into a purchase and sale agreement to develop the proposed project. Planned Unit Developnrew The project is proposed as a PUD because it includes residential lots with reduced size and width in lieu of mininuun 6,000 square feet and 60 feet wide required in the RI- zone. PUDs allow for flexibility in development standards to encourage innovative land use development. The proposed residential lots (average 4,952 square feet and 50 feet wide) are larger than most recent examples of other closed school sites that redeveloped to residential communities with a similar PUD request. The lot sizes range from 4,661 to 9,241 square feet with the most common lot size at 4.750 square feet (50 by 95 feet). The largest lots are proposed City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 1 0/2 712 0 2 1 oowerIB43 Leps;ar" File #: 21-804 MEETING DATE: 11/2/2021 along the western boundary where they abut existing homes. Project density is 6.23 dwelling units per net acre, consistent with the. proposed RL designation, which permits up to 7 units per acre. Although the request includes reduced lot size/width, the project is designed to meet all development standards such as building height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and parking. Closed School Sites with PUD Request Project Average Lot Size Range of Lot Size Lamb School (S 1 homes) 3.600 sq. fi. 3,659 - 6,695 sq. ft. Wardlow School (49 homes) 4,250 sq. ft. 4,152 - 5,864 sq. ft. Lel3ard School (15 homes) 7,216 sq. ft. 6,000 - 10,070 sq. fi. Franklin School (51 homes) 4,787 sq. ft. 3,370 - 5,535 sq. ft. Gisler School (85 homes) .952 sq. ft. 4.661 - 9.241 sq. fi. Conr7nrrrtill BelrCfits In accordance with I-IBLSO Section 210.12 (Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions). the project is required to provide mutual community benefits for the new residents as well as the ,general public that exceed the minimum infrastructure improvements required for the project itself. The mutual benefits proposed by the applicant include improvements to Gisler Park located immediately south of the project site. The Gisler Park property is owned by Southern California Edison (SCE) but the City has a license agreement to use it for park purposes. The applicant is proposing to: • Replace the existing tot lot area and construct a new combined play area with new play equipment, benches. and planter areas: • Replace over 3,500 linear feet of walking path with a 10 foot wide grey concrete path: • Provide a new walking path in certain sections: • Replace existing trash cans: and • Contribute S250.000 towards the installation of' sports field lights on a Huntington Beach City School District Property and allow access by a non-profit(s) for recreational use. The money shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of'building permits and will be held in an escrow account for two years until the School District is ready to use the funds for the lighting project. The City will have the right to use the funds for another community benefit project if the School District does not complete the lighting project within two years of'City Council approval of'the project. These benefits provided a basis for supporting the proposed reduction in lot size and width by providing the City with park and recreation improvements. Community Services staff has had preliminary discussions with SCE about the Gisler Park improvements and does not anticipate SCE taking_ issue with the improvements. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION: On September 28, 2021 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed project. There were 12 speakers (7 in favor and 5 opposed). Those in favor cited the need for additional housing, compatibility of the project with the surrounding neighborhood, ongoing concerns with a City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 1027/2021 aoweA644 Lexstar` File #: 21-804 MEETING DATE: 11/2/2021 vacant school site, and the financial benefit to the school district. Those in opposition expressed concerns about the loss of soccer fields/open space and having one access only to the new development. After discussing the loss of soccer fields, property rights, and community benefits, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND and approve the TTM and CUP. The Planning Commission modified the TTM conditions of approval to specify that the applicant's $250,000 contribution be used for another park and recreation community benefit in southeast Huntington Beach if not used by the Huntington Beach City School District for a sports field lighting project within two years of City Council approval of the project. Planning Commission Action on September 28, 2021 : A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Perkins, to recommend to the City Council approval of GPA No. 20-002, ZMA No. 20-002, and MND No. 20-002 and to approve TTM No. 19136 and CUP No. 20-024 with findings and conditions carried by the following vote: AYES: Acosta-Galvan, Mandic, Perkins, Scandura, Rodriguez NOES: Ray ABSTAIN: ABSENT: MOTION PASSED D. STAFF ANALYSIS: The staff report for the September 28, 2021 Planning Commission hearing (Attachment No. 4) provides a more detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project including the GPA, ZMA, and MND requests before the City Council as well as the TTM and CUP that were approved by the Planning Commission. In summary, staff recommends approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND based on the following: - The NIND is adequate, complete, and has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures. - The GPA and ZiMA are consistent with the General Plan and its goals and policies. - The GPA and ZMA are compatible with the surrounding area. - The ZMA will implement the proposed General Plan land use designation. - The project adds to the City's housing stock. Environmental Status: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project (Attachment No. 11) and concludes that no significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources. The MND was available for a 20-day public review period from July 22 to August 10, 2021. A response to the six comment letters received (Attachment No. 9) is attached for City Council review prior to action on the project. City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 10272021 oowert645 Legmta,' File #: 21-804 MEETING DATE: 11/2/2021 Strategic Plan Goal: Economic Development & Housing Attachment(§): 1. Su__rested I-indings liar Approval of MND No. 20-002 and ZMA No. 20-002 2. Resolution No. 2021-51 for GPA No. 20-002 3. Ordinance No. 4236 for ZMA No. 20-002 4. September 28, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report 5. Vicinity Map 6. Project Narrative received and dated Aug. 27, 2021 7. Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps 8. Letters in Opposition/Support 9. Response To Comments Draft NIND No. 20-002 10. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11. Draft MND No. 20-002 - available at <hops://www.ht��tim�tonbeachrt.eov/rsovcrnmenUdeoarunents/planning/ntaior/major-projects-view.cfm ' 12.Tentative Tract Map No. 19136, Site Plan, and Gisler Park Improvements dated July 14, 2021 (For Reference Only) 13. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 1012712021 P0w0646 Lepstar'° ORDINANCE NO. 4236 AN ORDINANCE OF TI-iE CITY OF HUNTNNTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNI'INGTON BEACH ZONN'G AND SUBDIVISION ORDNANCE TO REZONE THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 21 141 STRATHMOOR LANE FROM PUBLIC- SEMIPUBLIC (PS) 1-0 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL) (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 20-002) WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Planning and "Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Plannina Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002, which rezones the property located at 21 141 Stratlunoor Lane from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density (RI_); and After due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the real property that is the subject of this ordinance is located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane and is more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2: That the zoning designation of the Subject Property is hereby changed from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) (Exhibit B). SECTION 3: That the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended to reflect Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 as described herein. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended zoning map. A copy of said amended map shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SUCTION 4: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 4236 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 1011eiy be,!�: 2021. \flavor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORAM: City Clerk "ity Attorney RE XIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: D� ��= L City Manager Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Legal Description and \Map Exhibit B: .Amended Zoning Map Ordinar Nd. q2,5& EXhibi� '/I ' EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19136 PARCEL 2: THE SOUTH 600 FEET OF THE EAST 580.80 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING ALL MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS OF ANY KIND AND DESCRIPTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OIL, OIL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN WITHIN OR BENEATH THE LANDS ABOVE DESCRIBED, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, EXPLORE PRODUCE AND REMOVE SAID MINERALS FROM OR TO INJECT AND STORE SAID MINERALS IN SAID LAND OR OTHER LANDS, TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL, BORE AND MINE FROM OTHER LAND INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, ADITS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES AND TO INJECT, STORE AND REMOVE MINERALS AND WATER NOT PRODUCED FROM SAID LAND INTO OR FROM THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND AND OTHER LANDS, WITHOUT ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND OR INTO THE SUBSURFACE THEREOF TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET IN THE EXERCISE OF ANY OF ITS RESERVED RIGHTS, AS CONTAINED IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS REOCRDED MARCH 9, 1966 IN BOOK 7863, PAGE 809, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN 149-302-17 THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS' ACT. KURT R. TROXELL, P.L.S. 7854 v i DATE PREPARED: * - # r Ny. \o. 7854 c OF G\l.\yo4 EXHIBIT A- Page 2 of 2 M:\Mapping\308\087\Legals\Property Legal\308-087Lgl-Exist Prop.docx Exhibit A x 0 Q—fig zi Jug yM~N1CW15 �'+ a Y r c N g - V O > y0 p Se/ N Q e Subject Site m c p o W p y m V V o � N N S z W i 0' Z x aD r C O 3 W Oa < a '=^ ` N b � " ti W x m b N R = M � t\V' 17 N O N h � s 4 .:.«rvs..o/ 10 b 3GP13Jv/ W • o� .w .A�° C lZI z O 0 a O 3NV7.N OJS vsnHi Q °j 2 Q �133N1S ONVHSle Y c ' Ob A/0. L123,4- y • , . 79 1 • ¢ RL . , 149-302- 17 1 � OS - PR { OS - PR .A i.tiFj.,�ty1�, Y� F:+! titl;L �.s y • j 1 f s AV 1 :•,. _ f-f- Iw'oa[1 Mr— .r, �� ' � �( ,', l ,�.r ry4. •ate �-►i�- dimmeno • -l` -� e�i .r • P �VK,r - ..fin. ........ . Ord. No. 4236 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) 1, ROBIN ESTANISLAU, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of 1-luntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of'said City; do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven, that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 19, 2021, and was again read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on November 2, 2021, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Peterson. Bolton. Delgleize, Carr, Posey, iMoser, Kalmick NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I,Robin Esianislau,CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and cs-offrcio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in �1 the Huntington©each l4'ave on November 11 ,2021. In accordance with the City Charter of said City. ��/L,/Y\,[P/r,Y,I_V -l�^ ��UA/`/'•�'L�`•"•�/ Robin Estanislau. City Clerk City Clerk'and ex-officio Clerk Deoun,Ciro Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. California 441,� / RAM" ) fIPPpeD VED 10 -o-/ /9S ^,z4ENDED City of Huntington Beach File #: 21-718 MEETING DATE: 10/19/2021 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Oliver Chi, City Manager PREPARED BY: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development Subject: Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, Resolution No. 2021-51 approving General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, and Ordinance No. 4236 approving Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 (Gisler Residential - 21141 Strathmoor Lane) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a request by Brookfield Residential to amend the land use and zoning designations to Residential Low Density at the former Gisler School site. The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the request. Financial Impact: As a result of the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 19136 and Conditional Use Permit No. 20-024, the applicant will submit a $250,000 community benefit contribution to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The funds will be retained for two years until the Huntington Beach City School District (HBCSD) is ready to use the funds for a sports field lighting project on HBCSD property. The City will have the right to use the funds for another community benefit project if the HBCSD does not complete the lighting project within two years of City Council approval of the project. Recommended Action: PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: A) Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and mitigation measures; B) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 20-002 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 2021-51, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 20-002" (Attachment No. 2); and, C) Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4236, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to Rezone the Real Property Located at 21141 City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 5 Pnnted on 10/132021 oowe,"by Legistar'" File #: 21-718 MEETING DATE: 10/19/2021 Strathmoor Lane from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) (Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002.)" (Attachment No. 3) Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. Deny Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002. 2. Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: A. PROPOJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Derek Spalding, Brookfield Residential, 3200 Park Center Drive, Suite 1000, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Property Owner: Huntington Beach City School District, 8750 Dorsett Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 The project includes the following requests: General Plan Amendment (GPA)_No. 20-002 - To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RIJ Zoning tap r\mendment (Z_tA1A) NO. 20-002 - To amend the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density. Mitigated Negative Declaration (NIND) No. 20-002 - To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposed GPA. Z_NIA, and MND are prerequisites to allow the applicant to subdivide and redevelop the approximately 13.9 gross acre former Gisler School site into 85 two story single-family residences (Attachment No. 6). The project also includes Tentative Tract iMap (TTM) No. 19136 to subdivide the site into a Planned Unit Development (PUD) project with 85 single family residential numbered lots with reduced size and width and 15 lettered lots for private streets. open space, and landscaping and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 20- 024 to allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6-foot tall wall/fence. The Planning Commission approved the TTNl and CUP on September 28. 2021. No appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the TTM and CUP was filed within the 10-day appeal period that ended on October S. 2021. The September 28, 2021 Planning Commission staff report provides a more detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project (Attachment No. 4). B. BACKGROUND: Gisler Middle School operated front 1973 to 1986. Subsequently, Brethren Christian School entered into a City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 10/13/2021 powered by Legistar'm File #: 21-718 MEETING DATE: 10/19/2021 lease in 2001 and operated at the site until June 2019. On October 15, 2019, the Board of Trustees of the Huntington Beach City School District adopted a resolution declaring the school as surplus property with the intent to sell. Brookfield Residential submitted the winning bid and entered into a purchase and sale agreement to develop the proposed project. Planned Ulrit Development The project is proposed as a PUD because it includes residential lots with reduced size and width in lieu Of- minimum 6,000 square feet and 60 feet wide required in the RL zone. PUDs allow for flexibility in development standards to encourage innovative land use development. The proposed residential lots (average 4,952 square feet and 50 feet wide) are larger than most recent examples of other closed school sites that redeveloped to residential communities with a similar PUD request. The lot sizes range from 4,661 to 9.241 square feet with the most common lot size at 4,750 square feet (50 by 95 feet). The largest lots arc proposed along the western boundary where they abut existing homes. Project density is 6.23 dwelling units per net acre. consistent with the proposed RL designation, which permits up to 7 units per acre. Although the request includes reduced lot size/width, the project is designed to meet all development standards such as buildin- height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and parking. Closed School Sites with PUD Request Project Average Lot Size Rance of Lot Size Lamb School (S I homes) 3.600 sq. 11. 3.659 - 6,695 sq. ft. Wardlow School (49 homes) 4,250 sq. ft. 4.152 - 5,464 sq. ft. LeBard School (15 homes) 7,216 sq. 1l. 6,000 - 10,070 sq. ft. Franklin School (51 homes) 4,787 sq. ft. 3.570 - 5,535 sq. ft. Gisler School (85 homes) .952 sq. It. .661 - 9.241 sq. ft. Comnutltltr BelteJits In accordance with HB7_SO Section 210.12 (Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions), the project is required to provide mutual community benefits for the new residents as well as the general public that exceed the minimum infrastructure improvements required for the project itself. The mutual benefits proposed by the applicant include improvements to Gisler Park located immediately south of the project site. The Gisler Park property is owned by Southern California Edison (SCE) but the City has a license agreenleot to use it for park purposes. The applicant is proposing to: • Replace the existing tot lot area and construct a new combined play area with new play equipment, benches, and planter areas, • Replace over 3.500 linear feet of walking path with a 10 foot wide grey concrete path; • Provide a new walking path in certain sections: • Replace existing trash cans: and • Contribute S250,000 towards the installation of sports field lights on it Huntington Beach City School District Properly and allow access by a non-profit(s) for recreational use- The money shall be paid to the City prior to issuance ol'building permits and will be held in an escrow account for two years until the School District is ready to use the funds for the lighting project. The City will have the right w use City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 10/13/2021 �wereb by Leg,s;ar"' File #: 21-718 MEETING DATE: 10/19/2021 the funds for another community benefit project if the School District does not complete the lighting project within two years of City Council approval of the project. These benefits provided a basis for supporting the proposed reduction in lot size and width by providing the City with park and recreation improvements. Community Services staff has had preliminary discussions with SCE about the Gisler Park improvements and does not anticipate SCE taking issue with the improvements. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION: On September 28, 2021 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed project. There were 12 speakers (7 in favor and 5 opposed). Those in favor cited the need for additional housing, compatibility of the project with the surrounding neighborhood, ongoing concerns with a vacant school site, and the financial benefit to the school district. Those in opposition expressed concerns about the loss of soccer fields/open space and having one access only to the new development. After discussing the loss of soccer fields, property rights, and community benefits, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND and approve the TTM and CUP. The Planning Commission modified the TTM conditions of approval to specify that the applicant's $250,000 contribution be used for another park and recreation community benefit in southeast Huntington Beach if not used by the Huntington Beach City School District for a sports field lighting project within two years of City Council approval of the project. Planning Commission Action on September 28 2021: A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Perkins, to recommend to the City Council approval of GPA No. 20-002, ZMA No. 20-002, and MND No. 20-002 and to approve TTM No. 19136 and CUP No. 20-024 with findings and conditions carried by the following vote: AYES: Acosta-Galvan, Mandic, Perkins, Scandura, Rodriguez NOES: Ray ABSTAIN: ABSENT: MOTION PASSED D. STAFF ANALYSIS: The staff report for the September 28, 2021 Planning Commission hearing (Attachment No. 4) provides a more detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project including the GPA, ZMA, and MND requests before the City Council as well as the TTM and CUP that were approved by the Planning Commission. In summary, staff recommends approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND based on the following: - The MND is adequate, complete, and has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures. - "rhe GPA and ZMA are consistent with the General Plan and its goals and policies. City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 10/13/2021 oonereo by Leg,star7- File #: 21-718 MEETING DATE: 10/19/2021 - The GPA and ZN1A are compatible with the surrounding area. - The ZMA will implement the proposed General Plan land use designation. - The project adds to the City's housing stock. Environmental Status: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project (Attachment No. 11) and concludes that no significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources. The MND was available for a 20-day public review period from July 22 to August 10, 2021. A response to the six comment letters received (Attachment No. 9) is attached for City Council review prior to action on the project. Strategic Plan Goal: Economic Development & Housing Attachment(s1: 1. Suggested Findings for Approval of MND No. 20-002 and ZMA No. 20-002 2. Resolution No. 2021-5 1 for GPA No. 20-002 3. Ordinance No. 4236 for Z_MA No. 20-002 4. September 28, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report 5. Vicinity Map 6. Project Narrative received and dated Aug. 27. 2021 7. 1=.xisting and Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps 8. Letters in Opposition/Support 9. Response To Comments Draft A9ND No. 20-002 10. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11 . Draft MND No. 20-002 - available at <hubs://www.huntinatonbeachr.+.eav/government/deparuncnts/plannine/major/major-nroiects-view.cfm? 12.Tentative Tract Map No. 19136, Site Plan, and Gisler Park Improvements dated July 14, 2021 (For Reference Only) 13. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 10113/2021 oo'wereo by Legistar° City Council/ Public Financing Authority ACTION AGENDA October 19 2021 PUBLIC HEARING *27. 21-718 Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, Resolution No. 2021-51 approving General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, and Ordinance No. 4236 approving Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 (Gisler Residential - 21141 Strathmoor Lane) Recommended Action: PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION A) Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 with findings (Attachment No 1) and mitigation measures, B) Approve General Plan Amendment No 20-002 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 2021- 51, 'A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No 20-002 (Attachment No 2). and. C) Approve Zoning Map Amendment No 20-002 with findings (Attachment No 1) and approve for introduction Ordinance No 4236. An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to Rezone the Real Property Located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) (Zoning Map Amendment No 20-002 )" (Attachment No. 3) Supplemental Communications (89) Speakers (In-Person, 22; Via Zoom, 4) Approved 6-0-1 (Peterson-Absent) as amended to condition that prior to issuance of the project's final tract map. the City must receive from the project developer a contribution of $500,000 to be used for soccer field lighting 28. 21-723 Public Hearing Held — Approved Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 21-001 (Killarney's Rooftop Dining) Recommended Action: Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions A) Find the proposed project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEOA Guidelines. and. B) Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No 21-001 with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No 1) Supplemental Communications (2) Speakers (In-Person, 3; Via Zoom, 1) Approved 5-1-1 (Kalmick-No; Peterson-Absent) as amended to cap rooftop dining area capacity at 65 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS OF APPROVAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 20-002/ ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 20-002 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL — MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 20-002: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of twenty (20) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 20- 002. 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. No significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment. Potential impacts from the project are reduced to less than significant through the project design, regulatory requirements, and mitigation measures. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 20-002: 1. Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 20-002 to change the zoning on an approximately 13.9 gross acre parcel from PS (Public-Semipublic) to RL (Residential Low Density) is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan as identified below. A. Land Use Element Goal LU-1 - New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-1 A- Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Policy LU-113 - Ensure new development supports the protection and maintenance of environmental and open spaces resources. Attachment No. 1.1 Policy LU-1C - Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-1 D - Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Policy LU-21D - Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policy LU-2E - Intensify the use and strengthen the role of public art, architecture, landscaping, site design, and development patterns to enhance the visual image of Huntington Beach. Goal LU-4 - A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Policy LU-41D - Ensure that single-family residences are of compatible proportion, scale and character to surrounding neighborhoods. Goal LU-6 - Neighborhood school sites adapt over time to meet the changing needs of the community. The ZMA will implement the land use designation proposed with General Plan Amendment No. 20-002. It will enable redevelopment of the closed school site into a single-family residential development that is compatible with the character of the neighborhood and meets the changing needs of the community. The proposed residential plans include three architectural styles that are in keeping with the proportion, scale, and character of the neighborhood and consistent with the development standards in the HBZSO. The project provides enhanced landscaping areas along street side yards, street corners, and mid-block. The project will maintain open space resources by improving Gisler Park as a community benefit in association with the request for reduced lot size and width. B. Housing Element Policy 1.1 — Preserve the character, scale and quality of established residential neighborhoods. Policy 2.4 - Utilize surplus publicly owned land for residential use where appropriate and consistent with the City's General Plan. Policy 3.4- Explore collaborative partnerships with non-profit organizations, developers, the business community and governmental agencies in the provision of affordable housing. Goal 4: Reduce potential governmental constraints to housing production and affordability. Attachment No. 1.2 The project is located on a surplus publicly owned land that is appropriate for residential use. The project is required to meet the City's affordable housing requirement equivalent to 10 percent of the proposed dwelling units. The project is proposed as a PUD, which allows for reduced lot size and width with the provision that the developer provides mutual community benefits for the enjoyment of the residents and the public. As such, flexibility with the development standards such as reduced lot size and width provides a mechanism to accommodate additional housing. 2. The ZMA would only change the land use designation of the subject property rather than a general land use provision and would not affect the uses authorized in and the standards prescribed for the proposed zoning district. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed because it will allow a surplus school site to be redeveloped into a residential development that is consistent with the character of the area and will add to the housing stock. 4. Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because the proposed zoning will implement the land use designation proposed with General Plan Amendment No. 20-002 and is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Attachment No. 1.3 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-5 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTNGTON BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN Ai\IENDIMENT NO. 20-002 WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 20-002 proposes to amend Figure LU-2 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan to change the land use designation of the real property consisting of an approximately 13.9-acre site located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane; as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B attached hereto, from Public-Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RL). Pursuant to California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 20-002 and recommended approval of said entitlement to the City Council; and Pursuant to California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 20- 002; and fhe City Council finds that said General Plan Amendment No. 20-002 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community, is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach as follows: SECTIONr 1: That the real property that is the subject of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the"Subject Property") is located at 21 141 Strathmoor Lane and is more particularly described in the legal description and maps attached hereto as Exhibits A and B and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: That General Plan Amendment No. 20-002 is hereby approved. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended Land Use \lap. A copy of said map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Community Development Department. 21-10213n_65837 RESOLUTION N0. 2021-51 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of J : 2021. 0 Nlayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �, ,�, City Clerk amity 1.6fttornev REVIEWED AND .APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: At,- r - U, 'D ( a— City Manager Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Legal Description and Map Exhibit B: Amended General Plan Map (Extract of Figure LU-2) Resolution No. 2021-51 Exhibit "A" EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19136 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCELI: THE SOUTHERLY 640.00 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 450.27 FEET. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LAND LYING EASTERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 125.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 195.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 600 FEET OF THE EAST 580.80 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING ALL MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS OF ANY KIND AND DESCRIPTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OIL, OIL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN WITHIN OR BENEATH THE LANDS ABOVE DESCRIBED, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, EXPLORE PRODUCE AND REMOVE SAID MINERALS FROM OR TO INJECT AND STORE SAID MINERALS IN SAID LAND OR OTHER LANDS, TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL, BORE AND MINE FROM OTHER LAND INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, ADITS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES AND TO INJECT, STORE AND REMOVE MINERALS AND WATER NOT PRODUCED FROM SAID LAND INTO OR FROM THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND AND OTHER LANDS, WITHOUT ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND OR INTO THE SUBSURFACE THEREOF TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET IN THE EXERCISE OF ANY OF ITS RESERVED RIGHTS, AS CONTAINED IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS REOCRDED MARCH 9, 1966 IN BOOK 7863, PAGE 809, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EXHIBIT A- Page 1 of 2 M:\Mapping\308\087\Legals\Property Legal\308-087Lgl-Exist Prop.docx EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19136 PARCEL 2: THE SOUTH 600 FEET OF THE EAST 580.80 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING ALL MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS OF ANY KIND AND DESCRIPTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OIL, OIL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN WITHIN OR BENEATH THE LANDS ABOVE DESCRIBED, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, EXPLORE PRODUCE AND REMOVE SAID MINERALS FROM OR TO INJECT AND STORE SAID MINERALS IN SAID LAND OR OTHER LANDS, TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL, BORE AND MINE FROM OTHER LAND INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, ADITS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES AND TO INJECT, STORE AND REMOVE MINERALS AND WATER NOT PRODUCED FROM SAID LAND INTO OR FROM THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND AND OTHER LANDS, WITHOUT ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND OR INTO THE SUBSURFACE THEREOF TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET IN THE EXERCISE OF ANY OF ITS RESERVED RIGHTS, AS CONTAINED IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS RECCRDED MARCH 9, 1966 IN BOOK 7863, PAGE 809, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN 149-302-17 THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS' ACT. C� Ro9 KURT R. TROXELL, P.L.S. 7854 x - x DATE PREPARED: N� y No.7854 T�, oQc Op CAI.\� EXHIBIT A- Page 2 of 2 M:\Mapping\308\087\Legals\Property Legal\308-087Lgl-Exist Prop.docx Exhibit A O y(Wrxl(b!5 "� P JNIt d N c a R a V o O c ry .j v V N o V 0 NIII • �'°' Subject Site m O v j U N � . 2 2 " O h i 2 b z m V h b � N O N h � 4 O a n u f 07 O/ q >' > b 0 0 xw, 3NV71 • 095VanH9 v O ^ °� oz 433N15 ObVHSna '� Y Qb 14d — _._— _ __ _ ! . j E ibit ° -W �. �Proposed Ge.: "v- ral ' PlAn Mors ap RL e! - 149-302- 17 I I • • �TIM • w , I' 4 * � •' If�Jl t rCr41 `JL(�i�� 4 n-= •+w� �� -ram. .. r,ouCr-- f Aii e • ' _I S .� � . 1 t � • -: M '.lam r.n_.. � 1. Res. No. 2021-51 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 19, 2021 by the following vote: AYES: Bolton, Delgleize, Carr, Posey, Moser, Kalmick NOES: None ABSENT: Peterson RECUSE: None 6�4� q4�anaJ46d City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ORDNANCE NO. 4236 AN ORDNANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTNGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDNANCE TO REZONE THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 21141 STRATHMOOR LANE FROM PUBLIC- SEMIPUBLIC (PS) TO RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RI-) (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 20-002) WHEREAS, pursuant to California State Planning and Zoning Law, the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002, which rezones the property located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density (Rl.); and After due consideration of the Findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan: NOW,THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the real property that is the subject of this ordinance is located at 21 141 Strathmoor Lane and is more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2: That the zoning designation of the Subject Property is hereby changed from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density (RL) (Exhibit B). SECTION 3: That the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended to reflect Zoning Nlap Amendment No. 20-002 as described herein. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended zoning map. A copy of said amended map shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 4236 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the _day of , 2021. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk y.! ity Attorney RE IE�VED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Manager Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Legal Description and Map Exhibit B: Amended Zoning Map EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19136 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE-, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHERLY 640.00 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 450.27 FEET. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LAND LYING EASTERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 125.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHERLY 195.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 600 FEET OF THE EAST 580.80 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING ALL MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS OF ANY KIND AND DESCRIPTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OIL, OIL RIGHTS, NATURAL. GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES-BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN WITHIN OR BENEATH THE LANDS ABOVE DESCRIBED, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, EXPLORE PRODUCE AND REMOVE SAID MINERALS FROM OR TO INJECT AND STORE SAID MINERALS IN SAID LAND OR OTHER LANDS, TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL, BORE AND MINE FROM OTHER LAND INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, ADITS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES AND TO INJECT, STORE AND REMOVE MINERALS AND WATER NOT PRODUCED FROM SAID LAND INTO OR FROM THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND AND OTHER LANDS, WITHOUT ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND OR INTO THE SUBSURFACE THEREOF TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET IN THE EXERCISE OF ANY OF ITS RESERVED RIGHTS, AS CONTAINED IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS REOCRDED MARCH 9, 1966 IN BOOK 7863, PAGE 809, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EXHIBIT A- Page 1 of 2 M:\Mapping\308\087\Legals\Property Legal\308-087Lgl-Exist Prop.docx EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19136 PARCEL 2: THE SOUTH 600 FEET OF THE EAST 580.80 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING ALL MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS OF ANY KIND AND DESCRIPTION- INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, OIL, OIL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN WITHIN OR BENEATH THE LANDS ABOVE DESCRIBED, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, EXPLORE PRODUCE AND REMOVE SAID MINERALS FROM OR TO INJECT AND STORE SAID MINERALS IN SAID LAND OR OTHER LANDS, TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL, BORE AND MINE FROM OTHER LAND INTO, THROUGH OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM THE SURFACE AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, ADITS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES AND TO INJECT, STORE AND REMOVE MINERALS AND WATER NOT PRODUCED FROM SAID LAND INTO OR FROM THE SUBSURFACE OF SAID LAND AND OTHER LANDS, WITHOUT ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND OR INTO THE SUBSURFACE THEREOF TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET IN THE EXERCISE OF ANY OF ITS RESERVED RIGHTS, AS CONTAINED IN FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, A CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH WAS REOCRDED MARCH 9, 1966 IN BOOK 7863, PAGE 809, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN 149-302-17 THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED- BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS' ACT. TROI G KURT R. TROXELL, P.L.S. 7854 G J x DATE PREPARED: T �.y No.7854 }� Op CTL<< EXHIBIT A -Page 2 of 2 M:\Mapping\308\087\Legals\Property Legal\308-087Lgl-Exist Prop.docx Exhibit A o bAM'rr10.Yf5 �" C 3x'vl C y — s N k U r x O Z N � aWa F V D 0 ° ° ° Subject Site m y k rc x Z Q V y W h t Z 1 V U m � O V N � ? O b h � 4 .glow o.� 0 f_ ' •f e.wi e 41 i. .e• eq .iv : .A.�u rvq • � ...• 'a Q ol Zt 3A(V7 a 075C9nH.7 2 PQ oo c o w acR!4 •� 433e1s obrHsne o ' Ob l s �. I I t i Exhi �} B I rya . � �; . _Proposed-- _, onin:g _ •-.r_ ; , _01 J� R L 9-3 OS - PR OS - PR 1' - ,... r.,. ..,t . 1 rr r ►,+r��r7i t .• j- ; �' � �,`_ �s . ram / , - "iCY 1-fi .�•s L-G, { _ City of Huntington Beach i File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Community Development Director BY: Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 20-002, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (ZMA) NO. 20-002, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 19136, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 20-024, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) NO. 20-002 (GISLER RESIDENTIAL) REQUEST: To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RL); to amend the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density; to subdivide a 13.9 gross acre site into a Planned Unit Development project with 85 single family residential numbered lots with reduced size and width and 15 lettered lots for private streets, open space, and landscaping; to allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6 foot tall wall/fence; to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. LOCATION: 21141 Strathmoor Lane (west side, south of Bluefield Drive) APPLICANT: Derek Spalding, Brookfield Residential, 3200 Park Center Drive, Suite 1000, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 PROPERTY OWNER: Huntington Beach City School District, 8750 Dorsett Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 BUSINESS OWNER: Not applicable STATEMENT OF ISSUE: City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 10 Printed on 922/2021 Powered by Leg,star- File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 1. Is the GPA necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community and consistent with other elements of the General Plan? 2. Are the proposed GPA and ZMA designations compatible with the surrounding area? 3. Does the project satisfy all the findings required for approval of a ZMA, TTM, CUP, and MIND? 4. Is the MIND adequate and complete in that it has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures? RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission take the following actions: A) Recommend approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and mitigation measures; and B) Recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 20-002 by approving draft City Council Resolution (Attachment No. 2) and Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002 with findings (Attachment No. 1) by approving draft City Council Ordinance (Attachment No. 3); and C) Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19136 and Conditional Use Permit No. 20-024 with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No.1 ) ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A) Deny Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002, Tentative Tract Map No. 19136, and Conditional Use Permit No. 20-024 with findings for denial. B) Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002, Tentative Tract Map No. 19136, and Conditional Use Permit No. 20-024 and direct staff accordingly. PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to subdivide and redevelop the approximately 13.9 gross acre former Gisler School site into 85 two story single-family residences (Attachment No. 5). The project includes the following requests: General Plan Amendment_(GPA)_No. 20-002 - To amend the land use designation from Public- Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RL). Zoning-Map_Amendm.e.nt_(ZMA)_NO.__20=Q02 - To amend the zoning designation from Public- Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density. Tentative Tract-Map (TTM)_No. 19136 - To subdivide a 13.9 gross acre site into a Planned Unit City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 10 Printed on 9/2 212 0 2 1 Powered by Legisiar I. File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 Development (PUD) project with 85 single family residential numbered lots with reduced size and width and 15 lettered lots for private streets, open space, and landscaping. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 20-024 - To allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6- foot tall wall/fence. Mitigated_Negativ_e Declaration_(MND)_No._20_002 - To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. Background: Gisler Middle School operated from 1973 to 1986, Subsequently, Brethren Christian School entered into a lease in 2001 and operated at the site until June 2019. On October 15. 2019, the Board of Trustees of the Huntington Beach City School District adopted a resolution declaring the school as surplus property with the intent to sell. Brookfield Residential submitted the winning bid and entered into a purchase and sale agreement to develop the proposed project. Study Session: The proposed project was introduced to the Planning Commission at a study session on September 14, 2021 . Some discussion took place regarding the need for a traffic light, a second entrance, retaining walls, recognizing the Gisler family name on site, the Design Review Board recommendation, and AYSO field use. The applicant has prepared their own response to the Planning Commission questions (Attachment No. 12). ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Sub sect Propertv And Surroundinq General Plan Designations, Zoninq And Land Uses: LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING LAND USE Subject Property: PS(RL) (Public- PS (Public-Semipublic) Closed Gisler School Semipublic with an underlying designation of Residential Low Density) North and West of RL (Residential Low RL (Residential Low Single Family Subject Property: Density) Density) Residences East of Subject RL, OS-P (Open Space RL, OS-PR (Open Space Single Family Property: Park) -Park and Recreation) Residences, City parking lot South of Subject P (Public) RL Gisler Park/Edison Property: Right of Way General Plan Conformance: The applicant proposes to amend the subject site's General Plan land use designation of PS (RL) (Public-Semipublic with an underlying designation of Residential Low Density) to RL (Residential Low Density). The underlying RL designation indicates the preferred land use designation in the event the site permanently transitions to another use. It allows single-family residential units at a maximum density of 7 dwelling units per acre and is an extension of the designation found on the surrounding single-family residences. The request is also consistent with other closed school sites that have City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 10 Printed on 9/22/2021 Powered by Leg,star" File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 redeveloped to residential use in the recent past such as Wardlow, Lamb, Lebard, and Franklin schools. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan as follows: A. Land Use Element Goal_LU_1 - New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU_1 A - Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Policy_LU_1 B - Ensure new development supports the protection and maintenance of environmental and open spaces resources. Policy_LU_1C - Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU_1_D - Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Policy_LU_2D - Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. I olicy_LU_2E - Intensify the use and strengthen the role of public art, architecture, landscaping, site design, and development patterns to enhance the visual image of Huntington Beach. Goal LU-4 - A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Policy LU-4D - Ensure that single-family residences are of compatible proportion, scale and character to surrounding neighborhoods. Goal LU-6 - Neighborhood school sites adapt over time to meet the changing needs of the community. The proposed project is consistent with the RL designation in terms of land use and density. It will redevelop the closed school site into a single-family residential development that is compatible with the character of the neighborhood and meets the changing needs of the community. The proposed residential plans include three architectural styles that are in keeping with the proportion, scale, and character of the neighborhood and consistent with the development standards of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The project provides enhanced landscaping areas along street corners, street side yards, and mid-block. The project will maintain open space resources by improving Gisler Park as a community benefit in association with the request for reduced lot size and width. B. Housing Element City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 10 Printed on 9/22/2021 Dowered oy Leg¢ta,• File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 Policy 1 .1 - Preserve the character, scale and quality of established residential neighborhoods. Policy 2.4 - Utilize surplus publicly owned land for residential use where appropriate and consistent with the City's General Plan. Policy_ 3.4 - Explore collaborative partnerships with non-profit organizations, developers, the business community and governmental agencies in the provision of affordable housing. Goal 4: Reduce potential governmental constraints to housing production and affordability. The project is located on surplus publicly owned land that is appropriate for residential use. The project is required to meet the City's affordable housing requirement of 10 percent of the proposed dwelling units. The project is proposed as a PUD, which allows for reduced lot size and width with the provision that the developer provides mutual community benefits for the enjoyment of the residents and the public. As such, flexibility with the development standards such as reduced lot size and width provides a mechanism to accommodate additional housing. Zoning Compliance: Zoning Map Amendment The proposed zoning designation for the subject site of RL is in conformance with the proposed General Plan designation and is an extension of the zoning found in the surrounding single-family residences. Development standards require a minimum parcel size of 6,000 square feet, lot width of 60 feet, maximum building height of 35 feet, and lot coverage of 50 percent, unless alternative lot sizes/widths are approved as a PUD with community benefits above and beyond minimum code requirements. Additional development standards are identified in Chapter 210 (Residential Districts). The adoption of the ZMA will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because the proposed zoning will implement the proposed General Plan land use designation and is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed because it will allow a surplus school site to be redeveloped into a residential development that is consistent with the character of the area and will add to the housing stock. Tract Map/Site Layout/Compatibility The subdivision is designed so that seven homes will be accessed directly off Strathmoor Lane to continue the existing street scene and foster a connection with the existing residential neighborhood. The remaining homes will have access through private streets that loop through the project and connect to one access point at Strathmoor Lane (located just north of one of the school parking lot driveways) while emergency access is proposed on Bluefield Drive. The private streets comply with the City's standard residential street width of 40 feet curb to curb, which allows parking and sidewalk on both sides. Although no landscape parkway along the curb edge is provided, the project's pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation are adequate. The existing pedestrian access at end of Panacea Drive shown as Lot B that was dedicated in fee to City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 10 Printed on 9/2 212 0 2 1 powerec by Legmtwr File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 the City on Tract Map 6893 will no longer be needed for access to the school but will be retained by the City in the interim until vacated in the future. Besides the private streets, other common areas will include an open space lot (Lot A) that will serve as a water quality and detention facility for the project and landscaped areas throughout. To enhance the aesthetics of the development, the project will include landscaped areas along all street side yards, at street corners, mid-block, and along most of the north side of the development next to existing homes. The applicant has submitted three residential floor plans that are two stories, under 30 feet tall, and range from about 2,800 to 3,200 square feet with up to 4 and 5 bedrooms and 2- and 3-car garages (Attachment No. 7). The proposed homes will be compatible with the homes located in the vicinity by complying with all development standards including building height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and parking. Furthermore, the new homes minimize overall building mass and scale by incorporating facade breaks, upper floor setbacks, and roof variations into the design of each plan. The project proposes three residential plan types with three architectural styles (Adobe Ranch, Coastal Cottage, and Transitional Farmhouse) that include a variety of traditional architectural elements such as tile roof, stucco, board and batten, siding, brick, awnings, shutters, pot shelfs, corbels, and a color palette compatible with the surrounding area. The only place where new homes will abut existing homes is along the west side of the development. However, the project provides a good buffer with setbacks of at least 25 feet up to 37 feet, which exceed the minimum required rear setback of 10 feet. Either a street, landscaping, or Gisler Park separates the rest of the new homes from other existing homes. Planned Unit Development The project is proposed as a PUD because it includes residential lots with reduced size and width in lieu of minimum 6,000 square feet and 60 feet wide required in the RL zone. PUDs allow for flexibility in development standards to encourage innovative land use development. The proposed residential lots (average 4,952 square feet and 50 feet wide) are larger than most recent examples of other closed school sites that redeveloped to residential communities with a similar PUD request. The lot sizes range from 4,661 to 9,241 square feet with the most common lot size at 4,750 square feet (50 by 95 feet). The largest lots are proposed along the western boundary where they abut existing homes. Project density is 6.23 dwelling units per net acre, consistent with the proposed RL designation, which permits up to 7 units per acre. Although the request includes reduced lot size/width, the project is designed to meet all development standards such as building height, lot coverage, setbacks, landscaping, and parking. Closed School Sites with PUD Request Project Average Lot Size Range of Lot Size Lamb School (81 homes) 3,600 sq. ft. 3,659 - 6,695 sq. ft. ardlow School (49 homes) 4,250 sq. ft. 4,152 - 5,864 sq. ft. LeBard School (15 homes) 7,216 sq. ft. 6,000 - 10,070 sq. ft. Franklin School (51 homes) 4,787 sq. ft. 3,870 - 5,835 sq. ft. Gisler School (85 homes) ,952 sq. ft. ,661 - 9,241 sq. ft. Community Benefits City of Huntington Beach Page 6 of 10 Printed on 9/2 212 0 2 1 powered by Leo,star" File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 In accordance with HBZSO Section 210.12 (Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions), the project is required to provide mutual community benefits for the new residents as well as the general public that exceed the minimum infrastructure improvements required for the project itself. The mutual benefits proposed by the applicant include improvements to Gisler Park located immediately south of the project site (Attachment No. 7). The Gisler Park property is owned by Edison but the City has a license agreement to use it for park purposes. The applicant is proposing to: • Replace the existing tot lot area and construct a new combined play area with new play equipment, benches, and planter areas; • Replace over 3,500 linear feet of walking path with a 10 foot wide grey concrete path; • Provide a new walking path in certain sections; • Replace existing trash cans; and • Contribute $250,000 towards the installation of sports field lights on a Huntington Beach City School District Property and allow access by a non-profit(s) for recreational use. The money shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits and will be held in an escrow account for two years until the School District is ready to use the funds for the lighting project. The City will have the right to use the funds for another community benefit project if the School District does not complete the lighting project within two years of City Council approval of the project. These benefits provide a basis for supporting the proposed reduction in lot size and width by providing the City with park and recreation improvements. Community Services staff has had preliminary discussions with Edison about the Gisler Park improvements and does not anticipate Edison taking issue with the improvements. Conditional Use Permit The site currently slopes down slightly from east to west. Project grading will require some cut and fill with a net import estimated at approximately 35,000 cubic yards. A more conservative estimate of 50,000 cubic yards was analyzed in the MND in case actual grading were to exceed the current estimate in the conceptual grading plan. Grading which involves soil import/export of over 25,000 cubic yards requires Planning Commission review and approval. The amount of grading proposed and the retaining walls described below are typical of large developments. Staff has reviewed the grading and utility plan to make sure that elevations and retaining walls have been minimized to the greatest extent feasible while allowing the site to function and drain properly. The project will have retaining walls not exceeding 2 feet tall along most of the project site perimeter and between some proposed residential lots and will be topped with a 6 foot tall wall/fence. The few retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6 foot tall wall/fence and subject to CUP approval are located primarily along the western corners of the project site on four lots (Lots 14, 15, 25, and L) adjacent to Gisler Park and a couple of existing residences and one location on the northeast corner of the development along the side of Lot 78. The tallest retaining wall is 4.4 feet topped with a 6-foot wall and located on the northwest corner of the project site behind 5 feet of common area landscaping that the applicant intends to convey to the abutting property owners. The rest are buffered by Gisler Park or common area landscaping to soften their appearance and not be a City of Huntington Beach Page 7 of 10 Printed on 9/2 212 0 2 1 powerec by Legistar" File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 detriment to the neighborhood. Quimby Act and Affordable Housing The Community Services and Library Department has determined that additional public park area within the project area is not needed. Therefore, the project will pay park and recreation in lieu fees to satisfy Quimby Act requirements pursuant to Chapter 254 of the HBZSO. Pursuant to HBZSO Section 230.26, the project is required to comply with affordable housing requirements and provide 10 percent of the 85 dwelling units proposed (8.5 units) to income qualifying households. The restricted income units may be provided on-site with the new development or off-site at another location controlled by the applicant. The applicant typically proposes how they intend to meet the affordable housing obligations upon submittal of their entitlement applications. However, the Planning Commission recently recommended approval of a revised affordable housing ordinance that would allow all for sale projects, like Gisler Residential, to pay in lieu fees, which is what the applicant is proposing to do. The City Council is set to consider the updated ordinance on September 21, 2021. If the updated ordinance is not adopted to allow the applicant to pay in lieu fees, then the applicant would be required to comply with the affordable housing requirements in another way (e.g. on-site or off-site affordable units). Residential Privacy Standards The project complies with the City's Residential Privacy Standards, which requires bedroom and bathroom windows above the first floor to be offset from bedroom and bathroom windows above the first floor on existing adjacent single-family residences. The project proposes new homes that will abut six existing homes generally on the west side of the project. However, only one of the existing homes has an upper story window and it will face the rear yard on Lot 15. Upper story balconies must be oriented toward the subject home's front and rear yards, a public street, or permanent open space. None of the residential plans proposed for this project include a balcony. Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: The project, as modified by suggested conditions, is in substantial conformance with the Urban Design Guidelines, Chapter 2 (Single-Family Detached Residential) by providing: • Ornamental landscaping and enhanced paving at the project entrance; • Landscaping throughout the development that frames, softens, and enhances the quality of the development; • Architecture that is compatible with the surrounding buildings and meets or exceeds the standards of quality, which have been set by surrounding development; • Architectural elements such as windows, doors, cornice elements, etc. that create a rhythmic composition; • Varied building design with significant difference in the massing and composition of each adjacent house; • Elevations that are architecturally enhanced; • Roof designs that complement qualities of the neighboring residential structures such as type, slope, size, materials, and colors; • Through streets that provide access to all lots with parking and sidewalk on both sides; • Open space in close proximity to every dwelling; and • Walls and fences with enhanced materials such as masonry with pilasters and raised planters City of Huntington Beach Page 8 of 10 Printed on 9/22/2021 Dowered by Legistar'- File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 along the most visible segments. Environmental Status: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project (Attachment No. 11 ) and concludes that no significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources. The MND was available for a 20-day public review period from July 22 to August 10, 2021. A response to the six comment letters received (Attachment No. 10) is attached for Planning Commission review prior to action on the project. Coastal Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: The Design Review Board reviewed the design, colors, and materials of the project at their August and September 2021 regular meetings and recommended approval with modifications to incorporate additional enhancements to the architecture of the homes and the design of the tract wall. These modifications have been incorporated in the TTM and CUP suggested conditions of approval. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: Public Works, Building, Fire, Police, and Community Services staff reviewed the proposed project and identified code requirements applicable to the project (Attachment No. 8). The Public Works Department has identified some conditions that have been incorporated into the suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1) Community Meetinqs: The applicant conducted community meetings in August 2020, January 2021, and August 2021 to explain the project, provide updates, and respond to questions and concerns. Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach Wave on Thursday, September 16, 2021 and notices were sent to property owners of record within a 1 ,000 ft. radius of the subject property, individuals/organizations requesting notification (Community Development Department's Notification Matrix), and applicant. Written communications received as of September 21 , 2021 are attached to this staff report (Attachment No. 9). Application Processing Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): August 16, 2021 MND - Within 180 days of complete application GPA/ZMA/TTM/CUP - None SUMMARY: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of GPA No. 20-002 and ZMA No. 20-002 with findings (Attachment No. 1) to the City Council and approve MND No. 20-002, TTM No. 19136, and CUP No. 20-024 with findings and conditions (Attachment No. 1). This recommendation is based on the following: City of Huntington Beach Page 9 of 10 Printed on 922/2021 powered by Legistar'" File #: 21-644 MEETING DATE: 9/28/2021 - The MND is adequate, complete, and has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures. - The GPA, ZMA, TTM, and CUP are consistent with the General Plan and its goals and policies. - The GPA, ZMA, TTM, and CUP are compatible with the surrounding area. - The proposed homes will be compatible with surrounding residential development with respect to height, setbacks, and architecture. - The proposed project complies with the provisions of the HBZSO with the exception of the reduced residential lot size and width. - The project adds to the City's housing stock. - The project will be developed as a PUD and provide mutual community benefits including improvements to Gisler Park and a $250,000 contribution towards the installation of sports field lights on a Huntington Beach City School District Property and allow access by a non- profit(s) for recreational use. ATTACHMENTS: I. Suggested Findings of Approval for MND No. 20-002, ZMA No. 20-002, TTM No. 19136, and CUP No. 20-024 2. Draft City Council Resolution for GPA No. 20-002 3. Draft City Council Ordinance for ZMA No. 20-002 4. Vicinity Map 5. Project Narrative received and dated Aug. 27, 2021 6. Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps 7. Project Entitlement Plans dated July 14, and August 27, 2021 8. Code Requirements Letter (for informational purposes only) dated September 16, 2021 9. Letters in Opposition/Support 10. Response To Comments Draft MND No. 20-002 11. Draft MND No. 20-002 - available at <https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/government/departments/planning/maior/major-projects-view.cfm? 12.Applicant's Response to Planning Commission Study Session Questions 13. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program City of Huntington Beach Page 10 of 10 Printed on 9/2 212 0 2 1 noweree by Legtsiar- d • ResidentialGisler Brookfield Residential Gisler — Strathmoor Lane Residential Project Description 21 141 Strathmoor Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (Revised 8/27/21) Project Overview Brookfield Residential's proposed redevelopment of the 13.64-acre Gisler School site will create a new residential community of 85 single-family detached homes that will be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood, with a site density of approximately 6.23 homes per acre. As a Planned Unit Development, the homes are situated on lots ranging from 4,661 to 9,240 SF, with a minimum lot width of 50'. The new community will feature 3 plan types, with 3 elevation styles for each plan. The plans range between approximately 2,800 and 3,300 SF in size, with up to 5 bedrooms and an optional 4 bathroom and 2 or 3 car garage spaces. Every home offers generous rear yards from depths of 22' to a maximum of 47' along the community's western edge, with Lot 15 enjoying a 50' deep rear yard. California outdoor living is provided with sizeable covered rear yard patio spaces that open off interior living areas. Homes will feature latest connected home technology offerings and they will all be solar-equipped and energy efficient. Gated access is not proposed for this new community, which will be accessed only from Strathmoor Lane to preserve existing neighborhood's current circulation system to the extent possible. A 24' wide vehicle emergency access point is provided from Bluefield Drive in the north. The selection for a mid-block entry from Strathmoor Lane was made in consultation with City Staff after comments received during the Preliminary Plan Review process. Additionally, by nature of a "T" intersection at "A" Street and Strathmoor Lane,there will be a natural calming effect on vehicles to and from the community. Traffic from the proposed development is projected to be less than vehicle trips generated by the previous middle and high school uses on the site, according to preliminary traffic analysis. The layout of the internal streets is similar to the adjacent single-family homes and the streets meet City Standard, with widths of 40' curb to curb, for a total 52' wide public right-of-way. At this width, double- loaded on-street parking is provided throughout the entire neighborhood, with the exception of the short section at the entry. With the provision of generous on-street parking options, the proposed site plan provides for a total of 472 parking spaces, well in excess of the required parking standards. Other infrastructure improvements will include private streets, sidewalks, storm drains, a water quality detention system and sewer system with a lift station, which will all be maintained by the future community's HOA. The water system is proposed to be a loop through the Strathmoor and emergency access point, which meets the criteria for a public system along with the 52' wide ROWS. HOA passive landscaping areas are found throughout the proposed neighborhood, including on open space area on Lot A on top of the underground water quality detention basin. Active open space area is provided immediately to the south at the Gisler Park and the applicant intends to contribute the city's park in-lieu fee, which is in line with the City's stated preference. Landscaping is intended to be layered with trees, shrubs and turf to complement adjacent buildings and soften edge conditions that feature thematic masonry yard walls. Additional landscape screening is proposed for the City's Gisler Park parking lot northern entry re-alignment and along the entire southern edge shared with Gisler Park, which is consistent with the adjacent homes to the west. Requested entitlements include a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Tentative Tract Map, Conditional Use Permit for retaining walls over 2' tall, Design Review Board and Environmental Assessment, with a proposal to reconstruct Gisler Park's existing improvements as a Public Benefit for the local community in return for the approval of the Planned Unit Development. Project Location and Existing Improvements The project site is located in the southeastern portion of the city of Huntington Beach, within Orange County, California. As shown on Figure I-1, Regional Map, the Project is located approximately 3.6 miles south from Gisler - Strathmoor Lane Residential Project Narrative and Description (Revised 7/27/21) Page 1 2 Interstate 405 highway (1-405), 1.4 miles north of the State Route 1 (CA-1), and 2.5 miles west of State Route 55 (CA-55). The project site address is 21141 Strathmoor Lane, Huntington Beach 92646 and is generally bound by single-family residential cul-de-sac streets to the north and west, the City's Gisler Park to the south, and Effingham Drive to the east followed by single-family residences, as shown in Figure 2, Local Vicinity. The project site is comprised of one parcel approximately 13.64-acre in size and is identified by the following Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 149-302-17 and 988-014-78. Existing Site, Surrounding Area Land Uses, General Plan and Zoning Designations The project site is developed with an approximately 73,000 SF building, which formerly served as both a public and private school. This building is located on the easterly portion of the property as shown on Figure 3, Aerial. Access to the project site is currently provided by one entry point off Bluefield Drive and two other entries off Strathmoor Lane. Existing traditional single-family detached homes share the property line to the north and west, across Effingham Drive to the east, and south across Gisler Park. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of PS (RL) (Public/Semipublic with underlying Low Density Residential) and a zoning designation of PS (Public-Semipublic). Existing Land Use General Plan Zoning Designation Designation North Single- Family Residential Low Density Residential Residential Low Density West Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential Residential Low Density South Gisler Park, Single-Family Residential Low Density Residential Residential Low Density East I Single-Family residential Low Density Residential Residential Low Density Background The Huntington Beach City School District (HBCSD) acquired the land for the Ernest H. Gisler Middle School in 1968, with the school opening in 1973. Gisler Middle School closed in 1986 when the Board of Trustees determined that the property was no longer needed as district enrollment had steadily declined since its opening. A long-term lease with Greater Long Beach Schools Inc. (operating as Brethren Christian Junior and Senior High School) started on July 1, 2001 and continued until they relocated from the Gisler site in June 2019. On October 15, 2019, HBCSD determined that the property was no longer needed as a school and declared it as surplus property with the intent to sell, with Brookfield Residential submitting the winning bid. Since then, Brookfield Residential has entered into a purchase and sale agreement with the current owner, HBCSD, to ultimately purchase and develop the proposed residential community. After Brethren Christian School vacated the site,the school building was boarded up and secured to prevent outside access. The vacant building and surrounding open space are in a state of disrepair and a source of public nuisance and blight to the surrounding community. At the request of the School District, Brookfield Residential is in the process of installing a security fence to discourage illegal trespassing until demolition activities can commence onsite. Gisler - Strathmoor Lane Residential Project Narrative and Description (Revised 7/27/21) P a g e 1 3 Community Benefit To comply with Public Benefit provision required by approval of a Planned Unit Development, Brookfield Residential proposes to reconstruct existing improvements at Gisler Park, which is located immediately to the south of the project site. Please refer to the Gisler Park Improvement Exhibit included in the submittal package for graphical reference. While Brookfield understands that this City park is on Southern California Edison (SCE) property, the improvements proposed are largely the improvement of existing improvements in need of maintenance, such as: - Complete replacement of the existing tot lot area and the construction of a new combined play area that will feature new play equipment structures for multiple age ranges on a new rubberized play surface. The reconstructed tot lot play area will also include new park benches and landscaping planter areas. - Removal and replacement of over 3,500 LF of the existing walking path with a 10' wide natural grey concrete path along the entire length of the linear park. Replacement of concrete path will ensure walking paths are brought into compliance with the latest ADA/accessibility requirements at multiple park entry points. New walking path sections will be added in several areas to enhance pedestrian circulation across the park. City specified trash cans will replace existing metal trash cans throughout the park. Existing walkway is in a state disrepair and increased width will provide for better bi-directional traffic flow for pedestrians. These improvements are proposed with the aim of keeping the City's park maintenance costs low by being largely limited to hardscape and will hopefully reduce increased costs required to maintain the existing conditions. Additionally, these improvements are expected to not expand beyond the City's license agreement with SCE or trigger any clearance issues with the above ground high-voltage transmission lines running through the length of the park. As an additional community benefit, Brookfield Residential will contribute $250,000 towards a sports field lighting improvement project on a replacement field located within the Huntington Beach City School District. This contribution will benefit the residents of Southern Huntington Beach by offsetting the loss of the sports fields used by AYSO Region 56 at the former Gisler School Site. Draft Affordable Housing Plan Brookfield Residential intends to comply with the updated Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance that is expected to be approved by the City Council. It is understood that the revised ordinance will permit residential developments up to 1 00-units to pay the affordable in-lieu fee on a per square-foot basis. Should the City's affordable housing ordinance not be approved prior to the consideration of this project by the Planning Commission, Brookfield requests that a condition be implemented on the project's approval that requires compliance with the Affordable Housing regulations in effect at the time of first production home building permit issuance. Project Features Architecture The project has been crafted to complement the surrounding community character through a variety of elevation massing, roof forms, elevation styles and color schemes. There are three different plans being proposed as delineated below, each of which are two stories with a maximum height of about 28'-5" feet: • Plan 1 (2 story, 2,816 sf 4 bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms): 26 units • Plan 2 (2 story, 2,923 sf 4 bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms): 30 units • Plan 3 (2 story, 3,227 sf 5 bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms): 29 units Gisler - Strathmoor Lane Residential Project Narrative and Description (Revised 7/27/21) Page j4 3 elevation styles and 3 color schemes will be available for all three plans and interspersed throughout the community to avoid repetition. Each set of 3 schemes have been developed specifically to be distinctive to that individual style adding to the community character and sense of place. All the elements mentioned below are designed into the product offering a timeless and unique street scene. Landscaping The project site will be improved with layered landscaping along the northern portion of the property to provide a buffer from the neighboring residential homes and the public ROW. HOA common landscaping areas are provided along all street frontages, including enlarged landscape areas at the project's entry to provide sufficient space for substantial landscaping and monumentation. Additionally, a landscape buffer has been created at the northwest corner of the site where the proposed perimeter wall will be setback 10' from the back of the public sidewalk to provide sufficient room for trees and landscape screening. Landscaping has also been proposed for the perimeter wall sections along the City's Gisler Park parking lot and exposed wall sections at Bluefield Drive and internal streets. A variety of trees are being proposed throughout including: Star Pine, NCN, Palo Verde, Mediterranean Fan Palm, Carrotwood Tree and Dragon Tree providing an array of coloring and sizes. Brookfield will install 36" box trees in every front yard and leave the balance of the front and rear yards for each home owner's personalized landscaping. Circulation and Parking Access to the project site will be via Strathmoor Lane. Seven homes will front on Strathmoor Lane, with the balance of 78 homes accessed via private streets connecting to Strathmoor Lane at a single access point. Private streets will have sidewalks. Two of the proposed streets will be oriented north-south, connecting to three streets oriented east-west providing access to the lots within the middle portion of the site. A total of 472 parking spaces will be provided for both residents and their guests, including 199 garage spaces, 170 driveway spaces and 103 on-street spaces. A breakdown of the parking requirements per home layout has been provided below for reference: • 4 Bedroom Homes: (2 enclosed/2 open x 56 homes) = 1 12 enclosed spaces and 1 12 open spaces • 5 Bedroom Homes: (3 enclosed/3 open x 29 homes) = 87 enclosed spaces and 87 open spaces Development Standards The project will meet all applicable development standards as highlighted below: Development Standard Required Proposed Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sf 4,661 sf (subject to PUD approval) Minimum Lot with 60 ft 50 ft (subject to PUD approval) Front Setback 15 ft 15 ft Side 5 ft 5 ft typ. Street Side 10 ft 10 ft typ. Rear 10 ft 17 ft min. Building Height 35 ft 28 ft — 5 in max Gisler - Sirathmoor Lane Residential Project Narrative and Description (Revised 7/27/21) Page 1 S Development Standard Required Proposed Minimum Lot Size 6,000 sf 4,661 sf (subject to PUD approval) Minimum Lot with 60 ft 50 ft (subject to PUD approval) Max Lot Coverage 50% 49.4% Infrastructure Improvements The proposed utility improvements consist of private storm drain, private sewer system including a lift station, public domestic water system, and a private water quality facility. The majority of the proposed site drainage will be conveyed via surface flow and a series of catch basins and storm drain pipes to drain in the southeasterly direction to a detention vault. The detention vault will detain peak storm flows and store the water quality treatment volume. The low flows will be pumped up from the detention vault to a Modular Wetland System for treatment. The treated and detained storm flows will exit the site to a proposed public storm drain connection to in Effingham Drive through the City's parking lot and by street flow onto Sirathmoor Lane. Solid waste bins will be provided to each residence, which will be stored on their respective properties. Construction Summary The project will be constructed in this order: demolition, which includes onsite crushing of concrete and pavement; grading; infrastructure; and horizontal improvements. Grading of the site will require the import of over 25,000 cubic yards. The IS/MND for the Gisler Residential Project analyzed an estimated 12,000 cubic yards of cut and 62,000 cubic yards of fill,that required of 50,000 cubic yards of import to be hauled in from an authorized off-site location. Rough grading and import are estimated to take 90 days. Home construction will consist is estimated to take 18 to 24 months. Entitlement Request The Applicant is requesting the following discretionary actions from the City of Huntington Beach in connection with the proposed development of the project site: • General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the land use designation from Public/Semi-Public with an underlying Low Density Residential (PS RL) to Low Density Residential (RL) • Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) to change the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Low Density Residential (RL) • Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit lot sizes under 6,000 SF and lot width under 60 foot minimum • Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the property into 85 lots • Conditional Use Permit to allow retaining walls over 2' tall • Design Review Board (DRB) to review the design, colors and materials of the project • Environmental Assessment (EA) to analyze the potential impacts of the proposed project. Gisler - Strathmoor Lane Residential Project Narrative and Description (Revised 7/27/21) Page j6 Slv nto" Gareen Grove ��_�— 2] „ .. . $onla Gne ]9 r. Fov main Valley i HvnL ngron � '_ \ Beach \ ..- x _ Cv.fa Me•v f ►rejod site � ss Newport / Beach Cy MltW—9mt 9 a cm my ar:os Mawr ku a um Maugenrrc BryIEItt Cw MCKWt4-o u S IAE, %ASIk EPA VSY. N 0 0.5 1 2Mfts i t r l t r r l ., Figure 1, Regional Map Gisler - Strothmoor Lane Residential Project Narrative and Description (Revised 7/27/21) Page 7 LA- � 1 Drw r�.•.�....aM '' _ S �. --- f..y�..c.... lid Is1 s ! Cn.a.tnu 1 . < tj I....M f...... •Ml\[n�,1 w ili D. . . 11: :r1111Lu1: v.rAwtM1M (lrrrn llrw nrr��IrM � �.' � � Y { �Cwry.Nrva fv.w` •� 1 1 St S ) T 4 s Mwr.I M'•f V�.. I)� �.� rlfYv..•..:MM Y..!�VY IuM � I� __ 1 � IF 1• -73 u.M ! _i__1�_31 J !• IMYnMi[1.1r. _ 1 c C C Op.nse.w A p une obi :CC iA 1 n..aam[>..r � ay„w..0(MMY. � Qr...!•e.,n.M N O hojM She Figure Z, L"al Vicinity - Y Ask +t- ' r1 r .A. r. at- I. t Yd. IMP r e F w r 1 41 ' IP soya rr= oogfefFarOT-- rr --b -r ` s i t =� � �Exis�t�in:g GeneraN 'Cris l. Plan PS ( RL ) ,f 1 � _p` J 149-302- 17 P I RLRM J Proposed General -Plan i 1 , R L i 1 J _ „ - rl 149-302- 17 J � RLRM 1 s � L l � Exi,s,ti n4 • Zo+n i n. - � -•y ' � - g 2- 17 1 I A *y "- OS - PR OS - PR at r r n.{ I • :r �f. r.- r.• � 'Lys I ,„ rr Pro � osed Zo�nin. � - p g .r " • fills E Ev ` 149-302- 17 • I zm .r OS - P R OS - PR-----" or Tsm RL .� Ramos, Ricky From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 1:23 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Ellen DeWitt<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Thursday,August 19, 2021 7:46 AM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Ortiz,Tito<Tito.Ortiz@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Nata lie.Moser@ surf city-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 08/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. 1 Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Ellen DeWitt ellen.dem ittCaa vahoo.com (714) 9684845 21011 Amberwick Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Thursday,August 19, 2021 1:24 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Paul Bertsch<no-reply@Rislerneiahborhood.com> Sent:Thursday,August 19, 2021 11:22 AM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.orR>; Ortiz, Tito<Tito.Ortiz@surfcity-hb.orR>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.orR>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.orR>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.DelRleize@surfcity-hb.orR>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.orR>; Moser, Natalie <NataIie.Moser@surfcity-hb.orR>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.orR>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.orR>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.orR>;gislerneiRhborhood92646@Rmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 08/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed,the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington r Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Paul Bertsch bertschoaulh(a email.com (714)968-1033 21121 Cocobana Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6432 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Moore, Tania Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 11:01 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Cc: lames, Jane Subject: FW: Development of Gisler Hi Ricky, I think this is for you. Thanks, Tania Moore Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office 714-536-5209 tan ia.moorena surfcity-hb.org From: Frakes, Sandie<Sandie.Frakes@surfcity-hb.org> Sent:Tuesday, September 7, 2021 7:42 AM To:Agenda Alerts<AgendaAlerts@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: FW: Development of Gisler From:Ann McCarthy<mccarthvhb@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, September 4, 2021 7:31 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.ora> Cc: Chi, Oliver<oliver.chi@surfcity-hb.ora>;Slama, Chris<CSlama@surfcity-hb.ora> Subject: Development of Gisler Good evening, my name is Ann McCarthy, I am the current Regional Commissioner for AYSO Region 56. 1 am writing in regards to the sale of Gisler Middle school and the development being planned by Brookfield. I am not able to speak in person at your upcoming meeting, and am sending this correspondence instead. I have spoken previously regarding AYSO Region 56, we serve from 1,400 to 2,000 Huntington Beach kids a year with over 400 volunteers as an all volunteer, non-profit organization. Over the last few years we have seen Gisler go up for sale and the closure of Perry. While we understand there are no current plans to sell Perry, we are concerned about this trend. Many neighborhoods in South East Huntington Beach rely on the school properties to provide park and field space. It seems as though these spaces were designed as duel use, as there are no other youth sports fields in any South East neighborhoods. 1 The City of Huntington Beach Park and Recreation Master Plan done in February of 2016 speaks directly to this problem. It references a 2007 Surplus School Property Purchasing plan that notes that all school sites are utilized by youth sports groups and that alternative park space is problematic. The Park and Recreation Master Plan notes that programs in need include those for 13-14 year olds and that lit fields are in high demand due to a shortage. It further shows that the City's parks can only provide approximately 16% of the needed youth soccer fields, 84% of the needed fields are provided on school sites. The loss of Gisler will mean the loss of the only field in South East Huntington Beach able to fit a full size U 14/16/19 soccer field serving kids 12 to 18, our only lit field, and our largest youth sports field space. All programmatic items the Park and Recreation Master Plan note as being in demand and short supply in the City. We dispute the statement in Brookfield's Negative Declaration that states "The Project site is currently developed with a school campus, which is not in use". The fields at this school are used year round by upwards of 400 kids a week. We previously requested that the City consider purchasing the field portion of Gisler. We were told that due to the purchase of LeBard this was not feasible. We believe the City should take notice and action in regards to the loss of open / park / field space. Once developed there is no option to reclaim any of this space. Community based programs, including AYSO, Little League, Friday Night Lights and others that are run on these fields make up the fabric of a cohesive and desirable community. Without these fields these programs will not exist in our neighborhoods. AYSO Region 56 would like to ask, at a minimum, that Brookfield be required, as part of their Community Benefits, to replace the facilities that are being lost, specifically by contributing to the addition of lights at another field. We further suggest that the City should take serious note of the permanent loss of park space and address in conformance with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan and reconsider the development of these fields. Thank you, Ann McCarthy Regional Commissioner AYSO Region 56 www.ayso56.org 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Moore, Tania Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 11:02 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Cc: James, Jane Subject: FW: Public Comment - Development of Gisler Middle School Property by Brookfield Homes Hi Ricky, Here is another one. Thank you, Tania Moore Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office 714-536-5209 tania.moore(@surfcitV-hb.org From: Frakes, Sandie<Sandie.Frakes@surfcity-hb.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 7:39 AM To:Agenda Alerts<AgendaAlerts@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Fikes, Cathy <CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: FW: Public Comment - Development of Gisler Middle School Property by Brookfield Homes From: Shawn <shawn.41177@email.com> Sent: Saturday, September 4, 2021 12:00 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Public Comment - Development of Gisler Middle School Property by Brookfield Homes Mayor and City Council Members. My name is Shawn Thompson and I am a 23-year resident of Huntington Beach. Both my daughters grew up here and attended the public schools. They also were very involved in the many sports organizations that serve this community. One of the most important was the American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO). Region 56. AYSO is an all volunteer organization that teaches not only the game of soccer but the principles of fairness and sportsmanship where one of the basic tenets is "everyone plays." What makes this possible are the many fields AYSO is able to rent from the Huntington Beach City School District (HBCSD) And the most important fields over the years have been the lighted ones at Gisler Middle School. Soccer is a Fall sport so lighted fields offer the ability to practice and play in the early evenings. With the sale of the property by HBCSD to Brookfield Homes, AYSO is losing those lighted fields. Brookfield Homes has expressed its intention to assist in replacing those fields but I want to urge the Council to require them, as part of their package of community benefits, to contribute meaningfully toward the goal of replacing the lighted fields that will be lost as a result of the development of Gisler Middle School property. AYSO gave my daughters the ability to play an active team sport for a reasonable cost well into their teens because lighted fields existed which gave them the time and space to do so. I would like to see AYSO, HBCSD and the City work 1 together with Brookfield Homes to make replacement lighted fields a reality so that future youth of this community will have the same opportunity. Thank you. 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 8:30 AM To: jeinerjwr@gmail.com Cc: De Coite, Kim; Carr, Kim; Delgleize, Barbara, Fikes, Cathy; Jun, Catherine; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike Subject: RE: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Thanks, John. Your message is being forwarded to the Planning Commission for their upcoming meeting. ` Save A Tree -please consider the environment before printing this message This email transmission,and any documents,files or previous email messages attached to it,is CONFIDENTIAL,intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed. It also may contain information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product privilege. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution,or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or his or her designated agent is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If your receipt of this transmission is in error,please notify Sandie Frakes immediately by calling collect at 714-536-S249 and destroying the original transmission and its attachments without reading them,printing them or saving them to an electronic medium. Thank you. From:John Reiner <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:08 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@ Surf city-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/13/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of I IUntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: t I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, John Reiner ieinerj %r(u gmail.com (714) 756-0311 21112 COCOBANA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 8:30 AM To: jcolley486@aol.com Cc: De Cote, Kim; Carr, Kim; Delgleize, Barbara; Fikes, Cathy; Jun, Catherine; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike Subject: RE: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Thanks, Joanne. Your message is being forwarded to the Planning Commission for their upcoming meeting. ` Save A Tree - pease ppnsider the environment before printing this message This email transmission,and any documents,files or previous email messages attached to it,is CONFIDENTIAL,intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed. It also may contain information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product privilege. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution,or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or his or her designated agent is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If your receipt of this transmission is in error, please notify Sandie Frakes immediately by calling collect at 714-536-5249 and destroying the original transmission and its attachments without reading them,printing them or saving them to an electronic medium. Thank you. From:Joanne Colley<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:04 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/l 3/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Joanne Colley a colley486(u aol.com (714) 785-0319 21112 COCOBANA LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 8:29 AM To: jcolley486@aol.com Cc: De Coite, Kim; Carr, Kim; Delgleize, Barbara; Fikes, Cathy; Jun, Catherine; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike Subject: RE: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Thanks, Judith. Your message is being forwarded to the Planning Commission for their upcoming meeting. ` Save A Tree -please consider the envvonment before pnntmg this message This email transmission,and any documents,files or previous email messages attached to it,is CONFIDENTIAL,intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed. It also may contain information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product privilege. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution,or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or his or her designated agent is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If your receipt of this transmission is in error,please notify Sandie Frakes immediately by calling collect at 714-536-5249 and destroying the original transmission and its attachments without reading them,printing them or saving them to an electronic medium. Thank you From:Judith Reiner<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:04 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike,Posey@ su rfcity-h b.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL <city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/13/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Judith Reiner icolley486(u aol.com (714) 785-0311 21112 COCOBANA LANE HUNTINGTN BCH, California 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: James, Jane Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 7:20 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW:Gisler school/loss of Fields FYI Jane James I Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach Department of Community Development 714.536.5596 1 iiames@surfcity-hb.ore From: Rockin' Mama<mrsrowlson@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday,September 14, 2021 4:32 PM To: Planning Commission<planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Gisler school/loss of Fields Hello, my name is Linda and I wanted to express my concerns about the loss of open space and selling of this land. Both of my young children play AYSO and enjoy it thoroughly. Outdoor sports are vital to a child's growth, it encourages healthy competition and active lifestyles. From what I understand there isn't much open space left in Huntington Beach to properly play this sport. I believe it is up to our elected officials and those in the planning commission to protect children's play. It's imperative to have accessible open space available for after school sports. It was top priority in the Community Services Master Plan for parks and we should continue to honor this position. Sports like this are extremely important for children. It's up to us adults to make sure our kids,their kids and so on will always have safe open land to play, flourish and compete on. Once land is built on, we will never get it back. The dollar always wins once the shovel hits the dirt. Please allow your heart to speak louder. If this land is sold please provide an option in addition to what already exists. As of right now we are driving out of town for a few games and you should see some of the practices,these kids are squeezed into what fields we do have. The kids need a big field nearby with lights in replacement of the Gisler land. I can't think of any options or suggestions and that's what makes the situation very weary some. Please collaborate, think of the children's wellbeing, come up with a solution please. Feel free to forward this to the developer. Wishing this issue luck at the planning commission this evening. Please, please think of the importance of outdoor play in today's children's lives. Thank you for your time, you're work and your energy. Have a wonderful night. - Sincerely, Linda Rowlson t Ramos, Ricky From: Ann McCarthy <mccarthyhb@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:53 PM To: Planning Commission Cc: Luna-Reynosa, Ursula; Ramos, Ricky Subject: Gisler Residential Planning Commission, I spoke to you today during the public comment regarding Gisler Residential. I would like to provide you with a bit more information on our program. We currently use 6 Huntington Beach City School District schools for our fall program. including Eader, Sowers, Hawes, Peterson, Moffett and Gisler at a cost of$36,000 in permit fees to the school district With up to 1600 players and 160 teams we utilize all these fields to capacity. Gisler is our largest field with two full size playing fields and 275,500 square feet of space, the majority of which is lit. Later in the season Gisler is even more heavily impacted as teams move to our only field with lights. We have been in discussions with the school district to begin using Dwyer, Smith and the space behind Ketler, the new District Office location, once we lose Gisler This has not been agreed to yet, historically we have not had permits for Dwyer or Smith and the field behind Ketler would need to be rehabilitated. These three sites combined would provide approx 265,500 square feet, slightly less than what we are losing at Gisler Unfortunately none of these, or our current fields, would provide a full size playing field We are also currently working with the school district in regards to lights. Brookfield has hired a company to do an initial study of the schools in regards to which might be the most feasible to add lights. We have suggested Peterson as it has the largest field space and the location of the lights would be in proximity to the fewest homes. We understand the hesitancy in regards to lights We would however suggest that the engineering of light systems now compared to when the Gisler lights were put in is much more advanced and can be much more directed. We would obviously do community outreach. This spring we met with Musco, the contractor that recently put lights up at Murdy Park. These lights are a very good example of the new technology. Musco provided us with initial estimates on several locations. The installation of lights covering two fields at Peterson Elementary came in at $573,800, one field behind the District Office would be 5248,900 and using existing light poles at Dwyer (the lights are inoperable)would be $140,000. What is being offered by Brookfield monetarily will not replace the current facilities. An additional concern is the length of time the process can take If we lose Gisler in early 2022 we will likely not have a lit field for our Fall 2022 season. As you can see, we are trying to resolve several issues in regards to maintaining the level of fields and facilities. specifically lights, that we currently have. We are open to working on different solutions, with Brookfield and the City. We believe AYSO provides an invaluable benefit to the families and kids of Huntington Beach. Beyond these immediate needs, as we addressed today during the meeting. the loss of the school field space is problematic for all of Huntington Beach. Each one of these fields lost can not be replaced, and, as indicated in the City's own Park and Recreation Master Plan, these fields are in high demand and alternate space is problematic. We believe saving the Gisler fields would be a win for the community. I apologize for the lengthy e-mail and very much appreciate your time and consideration. Thank you, Ann McCarthy Regional Commissioner AYSO Region 56 www.ayso56.org i September 10,2021 The Honorable Kim Carr City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Carr: I am writing in support of the proposal by Brookfield Residential for new homes at Gisler school. I have been following the housing market in Orange County, specifically in the coastal cities. My family is dreaming of moving to one of these areas to enjoy the fresh ocean air and the lifestyle of a coastal community. New single-family homes are hard to come by in coastal communities. The trend lately has been to provide higher density developments like townhomes and apartments. We would prefer a single-family home in an established neighborhood like Gisler. We also hope to enjoy the benefit of the park that Brookfield will be improving. We have a local realtor we have been working with who alerted us to this development, and we were excited about it as soon as we reviewed the plans. We hope that you will approve these new homes, and we look forward to calling Huntington Beach home. Sincerely, Selvanayagam Sendurpandian (Selva) 2356 Pasatiempo St Livermore,CA 94551. (510) 709-6399 selva.sendur@gmaii.com Ramos, Ricky From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 8:36 AM To: Planning Commission Subject: FW: Gisler Residential AYSO Good morning. Please see additional information below from AYSO in response to a study session question. Ricky Ramos Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach (714)536-5624 From: Ann McCarthy<mccarthyhb@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 9:58 AM To: Ramos, Ricky<rramos@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Re: Gisler Residential Ricky, Thank you for your interest and follow up In regards to field space, Saturday use is just as critical as evening use. Our fields are as impacted during the week for practice time as they are on Saturdays for fames And more critical is having a field with lights. The short answer to your question is no, we do use 5 other HBCSD schools that will still be available, but would need a minimum of two additional schools sites (or other site) to make up for the square footage loss of Gisler. We are hoping to be able to use Dwyer and Smith but the school district has not yet confirmed that they will approve this. Unfortunately there are no current areas or sections of Edison Park that are flat enough or large enough for a field. We did have people participate in the last open community planning session that did advocate for fields in the new layout of the park. And as I mentioned regarding lights. at this time there are no other available fields in the vicinity that have lights. Please feel free to reach out should you have any other questions. Thank you. Ann McCarthy Regional Commissioner AYSO Region 56 www.ayso56 org ---Original Message---- From: Ramos, Ricky <rramos(d)surfcity-hb.orq> To: Ann McCarthy <mccarthyhb(aDaol.com> Sent: Wed, Sep 22, 2021 9:13 am Subject: RE: Gisler Residential i Hi Ann - Thank you for your very informative email below. I'm following up on a question that came up at the study session last week. Have you been able to identify a location to play soccer on Saturdays during the day if the Gisler site is developed? Thank you. Ricky Ramos Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach 714 536-5624 From: Ann McCarthy <mccarthyhb(o)aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 9:53 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission(a-)surfcity-hb.orq> Cc: Luna-Reynosa, Ursula <ursula tuna-reynosa aAsurfcity-hb.orq>: Ramos, Ricky <rramos(@surfcity-hb-orq> Subject: Gisler Residential Planning Commission, I spoke to you today during the public comment regarding Gisler Residential. I would like to provide you with a bit more information on our program We currently use 6 Huntington Beach City School District schools for our fall program, Including Eader, Sowers, Hawes. Peterson. Moffett and Gisler at a cost of$36,000 in permit fees to the school district. With up to 1600 players and 160 teams we utilize all these fields to capacity. Gisler is our largest field with two full size playing fields and 275,500 square feet of space, the majority of which is lit. Later in the season Gisler is even more heavily impacted as teams move to our only field with lights. We have been in discussions with the school district to begin using Dwyer, Smith and the space behind Keller, the new District Office location. once we lose Gisler. This has not been agreed to yet, historically we have not had permits for Dwyer or Smith and the field behind Ketler would need to be rehabilitated. These three sites combined would provide approx. 265.500 square feet, slightly less than what we are losing at Gisler. Unfortunately none of these, or our current fields, would provide a full size playing field. We are also currently working with the school district in regards to lights. Brookfield has hired a company to do an initial study of the schools in regards to which might be the most feasible to add lights. We have suggested Peterson as it has the largest field space and the location of the lights would be in proximity to the fewest homes. We understand the hesitancy in regards to lights. We would however suggest that the engineering of light systems now compared to when the Gisler lights were put in is much more advanced and can be much more directed. We would obviously do community outreach This spring we met with Musco, the contractor that recently put lights up at Murdy Park. These lights are a very good example of the new technology Musco provided us with initial estimates on several locations. The installation of lights covering two fields at Peterson Elementary came in at 5573,800, one field behind the District Office would be 5248,900 and using existing light poles at Dwyer(the lights are inoperable)would be 5140,000. What is being offered by Brookfield monetarily will not replace the current facilities. An additional concern is the length of time the process can take. If we lose Gisler in early 2022 we will likely not have a lit field for our Fall 2022 season. As you can see. we are trying to resolve several issues in regards to maintaining the level of fields and facilities, specifically lights, that we currently have. We are open to working on different solutions. with Brookfield and the City. We believe AYSO provides an invaluable benefit to the families and kids of Huntington Beach. Beyond these immediate needs, as we addressed today during the meeting, the loss of the school field space is problematic for all of Huntington Beach. Each one of these fields lost can not be replaced, and. as indicated in the City's own Park and Recreation Master Plan, these fields are in high demand and alternate space is problematic We believe saving the Gisler fields would be a win for the community. apologize for the lengthy e-mail and very much appreciate your time and consideration Thank you. Ann McCarthy 2 Regional Commissioner AYSO Region 56 www.ayso56.ora 3 BOARD OF TRUSTEES (` HUNTINGTON BEACH Bridget Kaub • Shari Kowalke `,_ CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Diana Marks • Paul Morrow. Ed.D. • Ann Sullivan Superintendent: Leisa Winston, Ed.D. September 22, 2021 Mr. Alan Ray Chairperson, Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Members of the Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: SUPPORT FOR THE APPROVAL OF GISLER SCHOOL — CONVERSION TO RESIDENTIAL LAND USE As the City is aware, the Huntington Beach City School District (District) is in escrow to sell the Gisler Middle School site property to Brookfield. As the dynamics of student generation and demographics shift, surplus property revenue has become critical to our ongoing improvements to our facilities. Brookfield has developed a plan that is consistent with surrounding development and the single-family residential land use framework that has already been established in the neighborhood. Like other former school sites in Orange County, these locations become homes for families that generate students and property taxes, which are necessary revenue sources for the District. The proceeds from this sale will be used primarily to fund the modernization or reconstruction of Sowers Middle School and pay off some of the District's long-term debt. Some of the important benefits of these improvements include developing collaborative spaces, improving natural light, improving technology infrastructure, and most importantly, creating innovative 21 st-century learning environments for our students. Without the sale of this property, the District would not have the critical funds available to implement these improvements and equitable learning environments between the district's two middle schools. Sowers and Dwyer, which has already been modernized. We recognize AYSO's interest in lighted soccer fields and appreciate our long-standing relationship, as they use the majority of our fields and we acknowledge the value that soccer provides to Huntington Beach youth. We are working with Brookfield to explore additional field options within the District. District staff are committed to working with Brookfield, which has provided funding to further study opportunities and constraints at several District locations. Brookfield has also indicated they are willing to contribute $250,000 toward a possible alternative. We are working diligently to conclude this study as soon as possible and will continue to work with all parties. The HBCSD Board of Trustees has not committed any additional funds toward an alternative lighted field. It is important to recognize that the District's core mission is to provide an educational program that supports the academic and personal development of every student, and the funds from this sale would be fully expended to improve the Sowers Middle School learning environment in support of this goal. We respectfully request the Planning Commission to approve the project on September 28 so the District can maintain its schedule, complete the transaction and close escrow in the next few months. Sincerely, Leisa Winston, Ed.D. Superintendent 8750 Dorsett Drive - Huntington Beach California 92646 (714) 964-8888 Ramos, Ricky From: Mark stone <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:45 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy;CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09 -12 2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed,the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Mark stone Michelle.stone@gynoncology.com (949) 981-9129 t 9341 Comstock Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Michelle Stone <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 7:43 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/22/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed,the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Michelle Stone stonemichellek@gmail.com (949)287-9763 t 9341 Comstock Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: De Coie, Kim Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 9:04 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, &Conditional Use Permit for Proposed 85 Homes in Gisler Tract Kimberly De Corte Administrative Assistant Department of Community Development 714-536-5276 kdeco ite@s urfcity-h b.org The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at perm itcenter(&surfcity-hb.org. HB ACA Help Center— Instructions to read before you apply online: htti)s:/IhuntingtonbeachGa.gov/heli)-center/ HB ACA — Apply Online Here: https:/ihuntingtont>eachGa.gov/aca From: Frakes, Sandie <Sandie.Frakes@surfcity-hb.org> Sent:Thursday, September 23, 2021 7:35 AM To: De Coite, Kim<KDeCoite@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: FW: General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, &Conditional Use Permit for Proposed 85 Homes in Gisler Tract From:Jena Walton<waltonfamily@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 20218:30 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Michael Walton<mike@pbuilders.com> Subject: General Plan Amendment,Zoning Map Amendment, & Conditional Use Permit for Proposed 85 Homes in Gisler Tract Huntington Beach City Council, t I received Notice of Public Hearing today for the General Plan Amendment No. 20-002, Zoning Map Amendment No. 20-002, Tentative Tract Map No. 10-136, Conditional Use Permit No. 20-024, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 (Gisler Residential). 1 am writing to express my opposition to the proposed development due to the excessive density of the development and traffic issues that the planned 85 single family homes would bring to this community. It is always concerning to me when Council must consider proposals that seek multiple modifications to current ordinances. Were not these 'rules'established to maintain the integrity of the neighborhoods they serve? This proposed development is no exception, and consideration of all these modifications is excessive. Although have several issues with this Planned Unit Development, I will keep this letter short knowing that compromise is better than refusal. My wife and 1 have lived in this community for nearly 20 years. Several years back, stop signs were added along Effingham Drive, which serves as the primary access road to this community. The signs were added to help reduce the dangers posed by vehicular traffic along this route. The propose development seeks to use Effingham Drive as its ONLY means of vehicular access to the development, thereby presenting serious traffic and safety concerns along the already impacted Effingham Drive. The developer has at least five (5) means of access points to the property - four of which are dead-end streets that abut the property and provide excellent access points. But, because the primary consideration is maximizing the number of units, a singular access point has been proposed. The City of Huntington Beach has the opportunity and responsibility to require additional access points. In doing such, the future traffic impact along Effingham Drive could be reduced by as much as fifty percent. Panacea Drive is a perfect candidate for an additional access point. It feeds directly off of Bushard Street and is short in length, thereby affecting only a few homes. On the other hand, Effingham Drive is a much longer street with multiple side streets affecting many homes and presenting future traffic and safety issues. Requiring an additional means of vehicular egress is a simple way to dramatically reduce the negative impacts on our community. Please consider the existing community when your are presented with this proposal. The developer would only lose a few homes, but the community would be far better served. I believe this singular access to the proposed community also presents a violation of the required access routes for fire apparatus. I am sure that the fire department would appreciate(if not require) the requisite additional means of egress to the new community. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 949-230-5573. Thank you for your consideration. Michael & Jena Walton 21171 Lockahaven Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Mark Burdette <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 7:39 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy, CITY COUNCIL, Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/23/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Mark Burdette theburdettes@mac.com (714)653-2906 t 10181 Patch Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 11:38 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW:Zoning Ordinance -----Original Message----- From: Sue Ann Pohl <sue@travelcenterhb.com> Sent:Wednesday, September 22, 2021 11:37 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Sue Ann Pohl <sue@travelcenterhb.com> Subject: Zoning Ordinance Please keep existing zoning as-is so our children can continue to play on sports fields. Thank you. SueAnn Pohl 1 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 3:39 PM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Michael Vernick<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 21, 2021 3:36 PM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL«ity.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/21/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity,the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Michael Vernick mvernick(a_v oitco.com (714)319-5757 21121 Indigo Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:20 PM To: De Coite, Kim Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Mike Bublitz<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 21, 2021 2:17 PM To: Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Pete rson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/21/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington t Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Mike Bublitz Mikewbublitzldgmail.com (714) 313-1947 21122 Indigo Circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:39 AM To: De Coite, Kim Subject: FW:Gisler School Site From:Terry Crowther<terry@ticrowther.com> Sent:Tuesday,September 21, 2021 10:38 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Gisler School Site Dear City Council, My wife and I live at 21191 Richmond Circle,just a block from the school site, and we are in favor of Brookfield's development of 85 single family homes providing the new development is restricted from ever splitting the lots or adding a second unit. Sincerely, Terry and Sharon Crowther From Whone Terry L Crowther Career Coach, "Helping you see clearly what you want. " Life Sculptor, "Creating sculptures with a story. " 949-422-0476 wutiv.ticrowther.com Instagtam: w«-%c.instagram.com/ticrowihersculptor/ Facebook: H%cH.facebook.com/terrv.crowther.12 t Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 9:28 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy, Jun, Catherine; Hopkins, Travis Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Here's the website that Brookfield Residential set up to send these: https://gislerneighborhood.com/support/ From:Laura Mills<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 21, 20219:24 AM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/21/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding r families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Laura Mills Imills083I Ca yahoo.com (714) 887-9588 21211 Binghampton Circ Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 9:13 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: loi Ngo<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday,September 21, 20218:59 AM To: Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.KalmIck@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/21/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Loi Ngo Ivngo95(g)vahoo.com (626) 780-7152 9952, Effingham Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Wendi Larsen <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 5:45 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy, CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Wendi Larsen Larsen.wendi@gmail.com (951) 533-1844 t 21102 Indigo Circle Huntington Beach,California 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Colette Bywater <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 5:51 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy, CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Can:and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Colette Bywater COLETTERN90267@YAHOO.COM (949) 533-1173 t 21081 indigo circle Huntington beach, Ca 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Jon Whitcomb <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 6:21 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92645 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Jon Whitcomb Jonwhitcomb@verizon.net (714) 504-4571 t 21042 Indigo Circle Huntington Beach, California 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Ronald Bywater <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 7:19 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntinuton Beach, CA 92643 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COnnellnenlbers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other conmmunity-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, finds from the sale ofthe property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become ma,nets for illicit activity, the ever-,rowing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property Values. A residential use at Gisler would brine ne\\, homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Ronald Bywater cyberron cr yerizon.net (714) 962-2953 t 21081 INDIGO CIR HUNTINGTON BI-ACH, CaliRxnia 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Christy Bublitz <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 7:55 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council Cite of I luntington Beach 2000 Main Street Fluntineton Beach, CA 92645 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the fonner Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other c0mnnmity-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current h0usi11e shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Christy 13ublitz Chrisglabublit-r_@-,mai Lcom (714) 313-2085 t 21122 Indigo Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Maria Spurgeon <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 8:27 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City Of'l-luntington Beach 2000 Main Street I-Itmtington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use ofthe Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionalty, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both voung adults who want to move back to their hometown and Fluntineton Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is oftcring the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Maria Spurgeon mariaspurg n gmail.com (480) 570-0303 t 21 192 Strathmoor Lane HB, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Darrin Spurgeon <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 8:28 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Niayor him Carr and Members of'the City Council City off-luntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nutch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become maenets for illicit activity, the ever-trrowim> homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and I luntin_ton Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs ofarea residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely- Darrin Spurgeon dmspurg@gmail.com (714) 642-655 1 t 21 192 Strathmoor Lane HB, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Sofia Spurgeon <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 8:38 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the Citv Council City of HUntin_t0❑ Beach 2000 Main Street funtington Beach, CA 92648 RE: l3rookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use ofthe Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential conununity on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nutch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults .who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offerin.- the opportunity for community input. As Huntington l3each residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before y(]U. Sincerely, Sofia Spurgeon arizonasofia48 o gmail.com (714) 322-3740 t 21 192 Strathmoor Lane FIB, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: JoAnn Miller <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.corn> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 5:33 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of 1-luntington Beach 2000 Main Street Flunting1011 Beach, CA 92648 R ': Brookf icld Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmcmbers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential cumnwnity on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district t0 address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-crowing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the Potential Ibr unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting_ to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housin_ shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents. we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. JoAnn Miller sjn1iller5@verizon.net verizon.net (714) 357-5917 t 21091 Indigo Cir, Indigo cir Huntineton Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Diane Whitcomb ono-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 6:14 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92r>46@grnail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members ofthe City Council City of I luntington Beach 2000 Main Street I-luntington l3cach, CA 92648 RL: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use ofthe Former Gisler Middle School Property Dcar Mayor and Citv Councilmcmbers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site ofthe former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes. potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property Values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current hOn_¢Ing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Diane Whitcomb Dbwhitcornb@verizon.net Verizon.net (714) 594-4570 t 21042 indigo circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Scott Miller <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 5:34 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor him Carr and Members of the Citv Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92643 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal liar a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. .Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become ma<_mets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntin_ton Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for c0nmnunity input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Scott Miller sirnillct-5@verizon.net verizon.net (714) 357-5917 t 21091 Indigo Cir, Indigo cir Flimtineton Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Kendall Miller <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 S:35 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92645 RE Brookfield Residential's Proposal fir the Re-Use of the Former Gisler i%,liddlc School Property Dcar Nlayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other Coln III Lill ity-%vide benefits .will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nurch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity. the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntinuton Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this ramie helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering die opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents. we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Kendall Miller sjmiller5@ycrizon.nct (714) 357-3917 t 21091. Indiuo cir Fluntinuton Beach. California 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Adam Larsen cno-reply@gislerneighborhood-com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 SA4 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal [or the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmenbers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of'yuality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neishborhood. Additionally, finds Rom the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become nag=nets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both voung adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding Iamilies. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input- As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Adam Larsen adamlarsen I I a gmail.cotn (714) 624-6826 t 21 102 Indigo Circle Huntington Beach, Calilbmia 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 7AS AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: mark Weiss <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 5:30 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COnnClltnembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Fluntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. t We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Fluntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, mark Weiss 1 tinarkw(r-i).vahoo.com (7 14) 964-6991 21061 indigo cir. huntington beach ca.... CALIFORNIA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:38 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Jason Melendez <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:26 AM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@ surf city-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Fluntini=ton Beach- CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity; the ever-_rowinu homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both youna adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current 110us611 shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering, the opportunity for comnumity input_ As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Jason Melendez primoOS(�wahoo.com (949) SS7-0175 21 142 Strathmoor Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 8:34 AM To: De Corte, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: AYSO Soccer and Gisler Field From:Jill Smi <jbanksmi@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 8:32 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: AYSO Soccer and Gisler Field Dear City Council members. I'm writing to you today to ask that you and the Planning Commission not allow development at Gisler Park located at 21215 Strathmoor Ln, Huntington Beach, CA 92646. - My child is part of AYSO Region 56 soccer and this organization is not only essential for the community, but playing on local fields with other families from my neighborhood and schools is instrumental for building the community! - Gisler elementary is our largest field, but most importantly, it is our only field with lights. - The fields at Gisler will be lost if this site is developed. - There is no other space in south east Huntington Beach for youth sports fields. - AYSO Region 56 is non-profit and serves from 1,400 to 2,000 Huntington Beach kids a year with over 400 volunteers a year. - Please save our fields or, minimally, require the developer to replace the field space and lights. - This is where over-development is hurting our city. Our parks, sports fields, and open spaces are NEEDED. Thank you, Jill Smith t Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 7:48 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Janet Smith <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 4:01 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntingtat Beach 2060 Main Street Huntineton Beach- CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COUnCllmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of'the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nutch- needed facilities improvements. Over time. Shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults Nvho want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing* new homes in this range helps address the current housi1l1 shortage. t We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Janet Smith Janet kin ith(uthotIm il.com 21032 Cocobana Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 7:48 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Kenneth Krueger<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 3:44 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barba ra.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Mcmbers Of-tile City Council City of 1-luntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential Conmumity on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time. shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults \t'ho want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for comnumity input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs ofarea residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before You. Sincerely, Kenneth Krueger ken.kruegerriverinm.net (714) 330-2548 2 11 11 Cocobana Lane Huntington Beach. CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Ryo IIJIMA <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 5:48 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie, Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad, gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City Of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property [)car Mayor and City COLIn Cllmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Ovcr time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Ryo IIJIMA 1064ri a gmail.com (949) 922-6084 t 2 12 12 strathmoor In huntington beach. CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Jenna Bloom <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 1:28 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City Of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gislcr Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not Only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both _young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is oflering the opportunity for connnunity input. As Funtington Beach residents. we have the best insight to providing Solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Jenna 13100111 thejennab72 a gmail.com t 21061 Strathmoor lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Gene Saunders <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 4:13 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislertieighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of'hluntington Beach 2000 Main Street I luntineton Beach. CA 92648 RC-: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COUOCiInlenibers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Oyer time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity. but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger [ionic to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is ofTering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Gene Saunders onerobanns a gmail.com (714) 968-4207 t 21092 Cocohana Lane Huntin ton Beach. Calif. 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Dan Bloom <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 1:27 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of luntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 926=48 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support 13rookf icld Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Althouah Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other commwnity-wide benefits will greatly improve the neii-,hborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time. shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Dan 13100111 dpbd 15 tr yahoo.com t 21061 Su<tthmoor lane Huntijw�ton Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Jacob Bloom <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 1:30 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislefneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Nlembers of the City Council City of Funtington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity,_ the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both ,young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housinU shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As I-luntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Jacob Bloom casunmmerl5 rr yahoo.com t 21061 Strathmoor lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Robbie Saunders <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 4:13 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of I-luntineton Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neiLliborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the cver-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is ofterin.- the opportunity for community input. As I-funtilu-non Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought belore you. Sincerely, Robbie Saunders onerobanns a email.com (714) 968-4207 t 21092 Cocobana Lane Huntineton Beach, Calif. 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Ian Thompson <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 3:54 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92r>46@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of'yuality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become ma_nets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents. we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Ian Thompson N.AMPADDIEGRUN-r a GIv1AIL.COM (714) 473-4380 t 9852 Gffinaham Dr HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Michael Daly <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 4:20 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Althouvh Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the ncighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As I-luntineton Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Michael Daly Mike a Prolinehospitality.com (714) 325-1292 t 21 1 1 1 Strathmoor Lane Hrmtin_ton Beach, Ca 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Blake Smart <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 4:46 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 926=4S RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Usc of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become maunets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values- A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both voung adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a lareer home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Blake Smart bsmart916 cr yahoo.com (951) 870-5319 t 21082 Cocobana Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Brandi Daly <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 4:21 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City 01'Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Cotuuilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middlc School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the nei ,hborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-groxving homeless Population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and 1-11-111tington Beach families wanting to move into a larger hone to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to elect the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood .when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Brandi Daly Bmartindale cr msn.com (909) 240-0412 t 21 1 1 1 Strathmoor Lane }-luntington Beach, Ca 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Michael Sveinson <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 4:48 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the Cite Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Funtington Beach. CA 92648 RE 13rookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mavor and City Coimcilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed. the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other c0nununity-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Fluntington Beach families xvanting to move into a larser home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Michael Sveinson Msvcinson2I @att.net (95 1) 403-2292 t 21082 cocobanaIn Fluntinaton Beach, Ca 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Kevin Gladden <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 4:48 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie, Fikes, Cathy, CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of I-luntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington 13each, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dcar Mayor and City COW7Cilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nutch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and bli,>ht. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both _young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Kevin Gladden Kgladden a outlook.com (909) 289-3734 t 21152 Strathmoor Lanc Fiuntineton Beach, Ca 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Staci Jeanblanc <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 5:48 PM To: Carr, Kim; Balton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Sweet FlUntin&tOn Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use ol'the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Althotuah Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofyuality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits xvill greatly improve the neig.hborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nutch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing. homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brin2 new homes fir both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wantino to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this ranee helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As 1-luntineton Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. StaciJeanblanc bobnsiaci@yahoo.com yahoo.com (775) 220-4032 t 21 112 Strathmoor Lane Huntington Beach. CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Cindy Hill <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 5:27 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/18/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Fluntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookf icld Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COUncilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity. the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both VOUng adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity For community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before VOL]. Sincerely. Cinciv hill Flakitatracy a yahoo.com (909) 809-6403 t 21 152 Strathmoor lane Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Robert Jeanblanc <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 5:50 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalrnick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of'Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site ofthe former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nutch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding_ Families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the oppornuuity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Robert Jeanblanc bobnstaci a yahoo.com (775) 315-7027 t 211 12 Strathmoor Lane Huntington Beach, California 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: bill derksen <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 6:39 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92C>46@grnail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Mavor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mavor and Cite Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a now residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the ncighborhood and will be missed. the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-_rowing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both voune adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for conununity input. As Hunting*ton Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before VOL). Sincerely, bill derksen derksen646 a gmail.com (714) 661-7647 t 9972 eflfingham drive huntin,ton beach, ca 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Eric Kilian <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 6:01 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/202 I Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of I-luntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Usc of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits gill greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, finds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, Lhc ever-1_'r0wi111' homeless population and blivhL Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes lot both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larder home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offerin.- the opportunity for communit}' input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs ofarea residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Eric Kilian Ericdkilian cr gmail.com (714) 915-3616 t 21 162 Strathmoor l luntin2ton Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Melonie Bloom <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2021 1:26 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; g islerneig hborhood92646@gmai(.corn Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/19/2021 Nlayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City 0f Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Fluntin_ton Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property pear Mayor and City Councilmembcrs: I Support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds Rom the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for umvanted activity. but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brie_ new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a lamer home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before VOL]. Sincerely. Mclonic Bloom mjs 1035 �+ yahoo.com t 2 106 1 Strathmoor lane Huntim_ton Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 2:14 PM To: Zap Cc: De Coite, Kim; Carr, Kim; Delgleize, Barbara; Fikes, Cathy; Jun, Catherine; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike Subject: RE: "Geisler Residential," Denial and Covid Funds Hi Ben, I'll send this to our Planning Commission tool Sandie Frakes 0nv IVanacers OiiiCe City Of HL:f'rilnOlOn BCaCh exec[ Dnone. 714 536.52 9 ASave A Tree -please consider the environment before printing this message This email transmission,and any documents,files or previous email messages attached to it,is CONFIDENTIAL,intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed. It also may contain information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product privilege. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution,or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or his or her designated agent is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If your receipt of this transmission is in error,please notify Sandie Frakes immediately by calling collect at 714-536-5249 and destroying the original transmission and its attachments without reading them, printing them or saving them to an electronic medium. Thank you. From: Zap <channelfrequency@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, September 16, 2021 2:13 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: "Geisler Residential," Denial and Covid Funds The "Geisler Residential" is a great squandering of the neighborhood land value. This nature, exercise, view and parking destroying, two storv, tiny property plan should not fly with residents and goes against any core philosophy of Huntington Beach Due to many types of past nature destroying development project failures, a major lack of Coln Ill Lill ication with residents and covid I am again requesting a denial of all development projects. I disagree with covid funds being used for a new police department building. The police department building is excellent and will be excellent at least far another 50 years I think. I would like the covid funds to be used for repurchasing properties for social distancing and other emergency sites and keeping food here. -thank You. Anonymous FIB t Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 12:38 PM To: Zap Cc: De Coite, Kim; Carr, Kim; Delgleize, Barbara; Fikes, Cathy; Jun, Catherine; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike Subject: RE: "Geissler homes" and in City farms Hello Ben, Your message will be forwarded to the Planning Commission to be included with their meeting documents on the Geisler Field project. Sandy Flakes Cily IMai nagei S On Icl? City of Huntington Beam dreg phone: 71-,i 536.5219 ASave A Tree -please consider the environment before printing this message. This email transmission,and any documents,files or previous email messages attached to it,is CONFIDENTIAL, intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed. It also may contain information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product privilege. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution,or duplication of this transmission by someone other than the intended addressee or his or her designated agent is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If your receipt of this transmission is in error,please notify Sandie Frakes immediately by calling collect at 714-536-5249 and destroying the original transmission and its attachments without reading them, printing them or saving them to an electronic medium. Thank you. From: Zap <channelfrequency@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 12:28 PM To: CITY COUNCIL <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: "Geissler homes" and in City farms To City Council. I disarurcc with building on the soccer field, baseball diamond and the parking access. The baseball diamond can even be converted into a simple %valkine area. A donation station or parking meter can be installed at the parking lot entrance. I disagree with building two-story tiny properties inside of a previously planned one story larger property neighborhood. Future residents will see this and not like this and the two-story homes will cast a shadow on neighboring foliage. Two-story homes are also a hassle for emergency services. The removed open areas also decreases landing space for the police helicopter. These homes will lower the land value and versatility of the neighborhood and increase crime and will continue to plague the politics. The school could also be redone for an emergency School site for Edison high School. I would only consider building two of these homes as one story homes, one for soldier families and one maybe for homeless or even a 5 acre Five bedroom fully carpeted mansion to replace the school building. I also see a sign in the neighborhood "save our fields." Residents also use this parking lot for viewing the sunset, fireworks, remote controlled race 1 cars or simply walking. This will totally destroy the previous freedom of view. This parking lot can also be used for emergency School storage or emergency School bus storage etc. Whoever is pushing this should step down. This is another major city planning error despite what the school board and friends may tell you in emails. The homeless crisis is solved here and the parks are excellent. We simply don't need Brookfield homes. I f Council Member Delgleize and Council Member Moser can continue challenging these types of things would like them to stay on the city council. I would like a statewide resident fanning initiative group, the city council, farming bureaus and representatives to immediately begin communication with Governor Newsom for property combination programs for in City farms in lieu of what we have recently experienced. And I would like an immediate development capacity lock placed on school sites to stop the school board, and on Beach Boulevard and the Bella Terra area. Thank you so much, Anonymous 1-113 2 Ramos, Ricky From: De Coite, Kim Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 11:06 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Kimberly De Corte Administrative Assistant Department of Community Development 714-536-5276 kdecoite@surfcity-hb.org The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at Perm itcenter(cDsurfcity-hb.org. HB ACA Help Center — Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ HB ACA — Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Frakes, Sandie<Sandie.Frakes@surfcity-hb.org> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 10:55 AM To: De Coite, Kim <KDeCoite@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Fikes, Cathy <CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Ian Thompson <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 10:05 AM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@)surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@ surf city-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Deleleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@Rmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 1 09/23/2021 Mayor him Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councihnembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ol'quality homes, potential park improvements and other Coln III Lill ity-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nurch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity. the ever-growing homeless population and bliL,ht. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both _young adults who want to move back to their homctown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Ian Thompson e9852 nasocal.rr.com (714) 473-4330 9852 Effinaham Dr HUNTINGTN 13CH, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Jim Smith <jps@jpsdesignsbuild.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 5:45 AM To: Planning Commission Subject: Gisler (aka Brethren Christian) We understand On Tuesday, September 28th @6pm there is a Planning Commission Public Hearing about this project. We wanted to let the Planning Commission know that we are for the kids of Huntington Beach having sports fields and that if you are considering approving this project we hope you have a plan in place, in advance, to provide alternate field space with lights. Also, please know that accepting money in lieu of providing the facilities is unacceptable. (this was discussed at the last meeting ). My family/kids and many others have been involved in HB sport for decades now. Bottom line is the sports fields in HB are becoming less and less available due to over developing parks & schools. Our kids need fields to continue to play their sports. Thanks for your consideration Resident of HB since 1970. 'The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten."—Benjamin Franklin James P Smith President/Founder JPS Designs/Division 1 Construction DBA JPS Designs+Build JPS[7a/psdesignsbuild.cam General Contractors License #986010 www.ipsdesignsbuild.com ® 9 M 120 Industrial Way Costa Mesa, CA 92627 C. 949.254.6106 P. 949.650.9992 F. 949.650,9995 D20 JIPS DIVISION 2 CONSTRUCTION DESIGNS + BUILD t Ramos, Ricky From: TRICIA IVISON <tmjivison@msn.com> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 10:04 PM To: Planning Commission Subject: Gisler fields Dear Planning committee, I am writing in regards to the proposal to sell off the Gisler fields to a developer. I realize that the school needs to be torn down and property sold. But does FIB really need more houses/high density housing? What HB needs is more people who will stand up and preserve the already limited fields for kids sports. All of my children used and loved their time on the fields at Gisler. Why anyone would threaten the existence of these fields is doing damage to the reputation of this great city. Please consider plans that would preserve and enhance these fields with lights, rather than destroy them simply for more tax revenue. Thank you, Tricia Ivison 801-589-3703 Sent from my iPhone t Ramos, Ricky From: lauriewayne07@gmail.com Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2021 12:03 PM To: Planning Commission Subject: Lighted field , Families First The Brethren school property "Gisler" is the only lighted field in on our side of Huntington Beach!!! (Newport West two) If you care at all about the families that pay the taxes that pay your salaries, please don't build more homes just for profit!! We don't need any more obnoxious mansions in our community!! We need sports, and places to play sports for our children . Remember "Greed kills " I pray you think more about our community than your own SELF INTEREST ►i4 Sincerely, The Wayne Family 9191 Aloha Drive HB, 92646 Sent from my iPhone t Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 8:17 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Gisler School site Hi Kim, More comments about Gisler. Sandie From: Maria Jones<rmiones4@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 2:40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler School site To The City Council, We have lived in our home in the Gisler Track since 1978. We have raised two children, who are now grown and have families of their own. They were able to play soccer and baseball on these fields. We were able to walk down Cocobana to the fields and watch them play. When I told them about the City's plan to build homes on "their" fields they were deeply saddened that in the future other families would not have the same experiences they had. We feel that these are "our' fields and should remain that way. Please reconsider your plans and KEEP OUR FIELDS11111 Thank you, The Jones Family 1 Ramos, Ricky From: Don and Maria Howarth <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 3:48 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; g islerneig hborhood92646@g mail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/25/2021 blayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Nliddle School Property Dear Mayor and Cite Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential c0nmmunity on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benetit to the neighborhood and Will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed tacilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-Urowing, homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property Values. A residential use at Gisler Would bring new homes for both Voung adults who Want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families Wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding lamilies. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity [or community input. As t-luntineton Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood When it is brought before you. Sincerely. Don and Maria Howarth mariahowarth @ yahoo.com (7 14) 356-8342 t 21041 Inferno Lane Huntineton Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Maria Howarth <mariahowarth@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 3:46 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Brookfield Residential Plan for Gisler Park Both my husband and I are residents of the LaCuesta Homes adjacent to the potential development side by Brookfield Homes for Gisler Park. We have been residents of our home for 35 years. We would like to inform you that as residents, we support Brookfield's plans for adding 85 homes to this tract. Keeping the area open as a school or open fields will be ongoing fights and unrealistic in this day. We believe that these new home will benefit the neighborhood and the area and will stabilize the property. Kindly approve these plans in your upcoming Council meeting. Thank you. Maria and Don Howarth 21041 Inferno Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-356-8342 t Ramos, Ricky From: David Green ono-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 3:40 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/25/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members 01-111c City Council City 0f Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Fluntingt0n Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dcar Mayor and City Councilmembers: support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential comnumity on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other conununity-wide benefits Nvill greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nmch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-,rowing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both voting adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. David Green corsinigreen a icloud.com (714) 376-3247 t 21042 Inferno Lane Huntington Beach, CALIFORNIA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Louise Green <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2021 3:39 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/25/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the firmer Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed. the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brie= new homes for both young adults who Nyant to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents. we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Louise Green corsinigreen rr yahoo.com (7 14) 376-3247 t 21042 Inferno Lane I-luntinaton Beach, CALIFORNIA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Bill Burhans <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 10:02 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; g islerneig hborhood92646@g mail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/24/2021 Mavor Kim Can-and 1%4cmbers of the City Council Citv of Huntington Beach 2000 Nlain Street Fluntingt0n Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Vlayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential c0nmtunity on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits xvill greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nruch- needed facilities improvements. Over time. shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless- population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their homctown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for conununity input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerelv, Bill Burhans bdburhans a yahoo.com (714) 594-8179 t 955 1 Panacea Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Victoria Cernok ono-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 7:18 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda, Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/23/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. fiords from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nutch- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A\ residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wantin« to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Victoria Cernok viccernok ct gntail.cont (7 14) 7 17-6876 t 9552 Blackfin circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: John Cernok <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 7:10 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/23/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Fluntineton Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COnnCllmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Althouiah Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofyuality homes, potential park improvements and other conununity-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Fluntin_t0n Beach families wanting to move into a lar-er home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering- the opportunity for community input. As Fluntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. John Cernok cemok cr gmail.com (7 14) 7 1 7-6S75 t 9552 131ackfin circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 z c ORANGE COUNTY RUSINESS COU\CIL 2 Park Plaza. Suite 1001 Irvine, CA926141 P 949.476.22421 F 949.476.04431 www.ocbc.org September 27, 2021 Mr. Alan Ray Chair, Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92646 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposed New Homes at Gisler Site — SUPPORT Dear Chair Ray and Planning Commissioners, Orange County Business Council (OCBC), the leading voice of business in Orange County, is pleased to support Brookfield Residential's proposal to build much-needed housing at the former Gisler school property. One of OCBC's core initiatives is to advocate for the development of new housing to meet the current and future needs of Orange County's diverse workforce. OCBC's research on Orange County's housing needs includes the 2019-20 Workforce Housing Scorecard, which identifies an existing 58,000-unit shortfall countywide—which is expected to balloon to 114,000 units by 2045 without significant action. Employees of local Huntington Beach businesses especially benefit from new housing opportunities, as they must otherwise commute to work from other cities within or outside of Orange County, increasing congestion and preventing them from living where they work. Brookfield's proposal to add to the City's housing supply by reusing the former Gisler school site helps address the need for housing for numerous demographics. This low- density project provides opportunities for residents with growing families and empty nesters alike to find a new home, freeing their current residences for others looking for a "move-up" opportunity. In addition to new tax revenue and economic development impacts, this proposal will also bring in new jobs during construction and new customers for local businesses. OCBC respectfully asks the Planning Commission to consider the numerous, invaluable benefits this development will offer to residents, the surrounding business community and the City of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Jennifer Ward Senior Vice President of Advocacy and Government Affairs cc: Members, Huntington Beach Planning Commission THE LEADING VOICE OF BUSINESS IN ORANGE COUNTY Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 10:21 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Field FYI Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center— Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca -----Original Message----- From: Allan Greenberg <allangreenberg10@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 10:19 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Field To Whom it may concern, I would like to voice our concern over the possibility of losing more field space. As our families fight the Covid pandemic, as-well as the screen pandemic we need every field possible to keep our families safe and outside. Please keep our fields. Regards, Allan Greenberg 714-797-2249 1 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 11:46 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Gisler Field Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center— Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca -----Original Message----- From: erin pheasant <kikiphez@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 11:44 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler Field To whom it may concern, I am writing regarding the proposed plans to take Gisler fields away from all of the local families in HB. As a 44 year old resident and former Region 56 soccer player, this is devastating news for us all. Currently my 13 year old plays for the same region, practicing 2 evenings a week here and playing all home games at this same location. There are not enough fields in our city as it is and to take the only one away that has lights is unacceptable! Are we only concerned about money rather than the mental and physical well-being of all of the people that use this space each day? Our children rely on this field to get away from the everyday stresses of life, yet do you not care or appreciate any of that? I ask you to reconsider what decisions are being made that benefit no one other than someone wanting a monetary gain...this will be extremely detrimental to those kids and families that have and currently use this as a place to make incredible memories and healthy choices. If you would like more information from me, please let me know. Kiki Pheasant Sent from my iPhone 1 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, lsela Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 1:02 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Save Gisler School fields Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca -----Original Message----- From: Florinda Bailey <florindabailey@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 12:43 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Save Gisler School fields Hello I'm a 45 year resident of South Huntington Beach and both my children played sports on our city fields and graduated from Edison. Sports were and continue to be a very important balance in our lives. Now I am a grandmother and have grandchildren playing sports. My granddaughter is now playing soccer at Gisler. My understanding is that you want to sell this property? Where will our children go? We have been using Gisler field for practices and games and the field is always full of teams practicing during the week (late afternoon and evenings in the winter). All the fields are utilized on game day. If you take away the fields where do our children go that have five fields and lights? You can't say go to another field because they are already at capacity and many of them don't have lights. This is our community and as such we should be working together to agree on a viable plan before any decision is made on the selling of this property. t Thank you Florinda and Jack Bailey 22322 Harwich Lane Huntington Beach 92646 Sent from my Whone 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 1:17 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Gisler Residential Project, Isela Siordia rldminisLrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenterpsurfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Mr. C <lock.haven@live.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 1:12 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler Residential Project, Dear Huntington Beach Planning Commission, I'm writing regarding the proposed Gisler Residential project. I'm against the project. The reality is that Huntington Beach is short of sports field space; South Huntington Beach even more so. Sports fields with lights are practically an endangered species. A lot of parents and players need fields with lights to fit their schedules. When the neighborhoods of Huntington Beach were being designed a conscious decision was made by the Planners of the time to use school sites for recreation. Agreements were reached amongst the City and School Districts with recreational spaces for the kids of Huntington Beach as part of the plan. Every sports field that disappears due to a school site being redeveloped is lost forever to future generations. You have an important job. Will Rogers famously gave the following investment advice: "Buy land—they ain't making any more of it." My investment advice is "Preserve the sports field—they ain't making any more of them." t Thank you for your consideration. Brian FIB Resident Sent from Mail for Windows 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Pam Bertsch <pam.bertsch@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 3:33 PM To: Fikes, Cathy; Ramos, Ricky; Bolton, Rhonda; Carr, Kim; Posey, Mike; Moser, Natalie; Kalmick, Dan; Peterson, Erik; Delgleize, Barbara; Planning Commission Subject: Brookfield Project/Gisler School Dear Mayor Carr and City Council, I am a resident in the immediate neighborhood of the proposed development at the Gisler school property. As a matter of fact, my home will share a wall with the new neighbors. I support the plans for 85 homes. I believe this is the best use for the property, since it will no longer be used as a school. The property is public property, yes, but it is not open space. The school district decided to close the public school, the private school vacated, and now the property sits, vacant. It is a magnet for illicit activity. The fact remains, the school district decided to sell. With that sale, a new use for the property must be decided on. What is the best use? Not industrial, not commercial. The property rests right in the middle of single-family detached homes and a park. The logical conclusion is that this property must be zoned for housing. For it to remain as open space, someone or some organization would have to purchase it at fair market value, an amount that would guarantee the most funds possible to return to the district to be used elsewhere at schools within the district. The city cannot afford to purchase the property for parkland, and no other person or entity has come forward with millions of dollars to purchase this land and leave it as open space. Again, the logical conclusion is for this property to be utilized for homes. Thankfully, the developer has proposed to build a low-density neighborhood of homes more like the current neighborhood. With mandates currently coming out of the stale to increase density even in low-density neighborhoods, i.e. SB9, I want to ensure that our neighborhood is planned well. Brookfield Residential's plan gives us this option. Single-family homes. Opportunity for input. Improvements to our park. And, to help address the loss of soccer fields, Brookfield has offered funds to help replace the lighted field elsewhere for AYSO. Furthermore, property taxes are a major factor in new funding for the HBCSD. These units would generate more funds for our local schools. Please approve this project and let's get it built before the state dictates the use for us. Thank you in advance for your consideration. 1 Pam Bertsch 21121 Cocobana Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 "If a fellow isn't thankful for what he's got, he isn't likely to be thankful for what he's going to get." 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, lsela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 7:45 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Gisler development lsela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Rob Peterson <racegrader@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 9:44 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler development Planning commission I'm writing to you in regards to the development proposed at Gisler. I am a 30—. year resident of H13. father of 2 daughters that use that facility on a weekly basis and field manager for AYSO Region 56. It is nTv understanding one of the reasons for entertaining the development of the space is because it's not being used. This can't be further from the truth. I invite VOL] to visit the field any weekday between Spm and Spm. Or a Saturday from Sam to Spm. You will find hundreds of HB residents plaving or watching soccer. -these are kids that arc outside exercising and learning valuable life lessons plaving a sport. Something that is vital to our children's wellbeing especially now with the pandemic and lack of social engagement. And the park is notjust used for soccer. As a nearbv resident I have newer seen a time when there isn't someone on the field playing with kids, walking their dogs (although not allowed) or simply taking a walk. If you're looking to do something with the area, why not consider a multi-use sports complex'? Something desperately needed in SW Huntington Beach. There is NO DOUBT about what is right for the residents of Huntington Beach. And that is to keep Gisler as open space. Please do the right thing and not allow that area to be developed. t Rob Peterson President, RaceGrader.com & RaceShed.com The "Go To" resources for the Southern California race community. FollOW us on FACI-1300K , INSTAGRANI, TWITTER 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 7:46 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Gisler Field!! Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department Of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Lizz Swanson <lizzmps@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 10:28 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler Field!! To Whom it May Concern, Our two children have played AYSO soccer for Region 56 for over seven years. They are on the Extra teams for their division and when Covid hit, soccer was their only outlet to see their friends. Our city was one of the few cities that allowed games and practices, so we hosted (and continue to host) many home games, our fields are absolutely invaluable!!! Soccer is one of the few things that has kept us sane. Without enough fields, our kids will not be able to play, there simply isn't enough space!! Please make field accommodations for our children!! Sports fields are very tight in Huntington Beach. Our city supports extremely active sports programs with very little appropriate field space. Most other cities have several, well kept, sports parks. Our Gisler site is particularly valuable because it is large with five fields (over 20% of Region 56 fields), and it is the ONLY field with LIGHTS. Field space with lights is critical. Our AYSO 1 coaches are volunteers, most with full time jobs, it is impossible to conduct weeknight practices in the fall and winter without lighted fields. We are requesting that you zone fields in place of Gisler, or allow us to keep the current fields. Please give our kids a place to play, learn valuable skills and stay out of trouble. Sincerely, Lizz Swanson Lizzmps@yahoo.com Scnt from my Whone 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 7:46 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Brethren/Gisler sports field importance Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Comnumity Development City of Huntington Beach 71,1-536-S271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center— Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Kimberly Ahmann <kimberly.ahmann@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 7:44 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Brethren/Gisler sports field importance Dear 1-113 City Council Members- I am writing to you tonight to ask that you DO NOT vote in favor ofapproving the development of the Brethren/Gisler sports fields. This is one of the few sports fields in Huntington Beach available to AYSO soccer and other sports programs. It is also the only field I am aware of that has lights for sports practices. This field has been very important to our family over the past 7+ years and it's overcrowding of teams proves that it is important to many other HB families as well. '] hank you. Kimberly Ahmann 1 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 7:47 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Another misleading and fraudulent project from the Planning Staff. Deny the 9/28/2021 Planning Commission public hearing item 21-644 Attachments: 230.24 Small Lot Development Standards.pdf; PC-public hearing item 21-644 September 28, 2021.pdf; Att 10 - Responses to Comments Draft MND No_pdf Isela Siordia Administrative SeCretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 7 M-536-S271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center- Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA-Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Tony<tsboardhh@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 5:11 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Another misleading and fraudulent project from the Planning Staff. Deny the 9/28/2021 Planning Commission public hearing item 21-644 Please add this email and attached documents to the September 28, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing item 21-644 Dear Planning Commission, I am asking the Planning Commission to deny this project. The Staff is misleading the public and the Planning Commissioners. This is fraud. 1 . This is not a Planned Unit Development(PUD). Per HBZSO 210.12 PUD's are attached buildings. This project is made up of 85 single family homes. 1 210.12 Planned Unit Development Supplemental Standards and Provisions This section establishes supplemental development standards and provisions that shall apply to all planned unlit developments. A planned unit development shall provide a mutual benefit for the residents of the project as Well as the genen public. Examples of public benefits that may be provided in a planned unit development include.but are not lit the creation of permanent open space.usable and appropriately located recreation facilities. the conservation of elements. land features and energy. and other public iniprovemems. (iSS5-S/10) A. Maps. A tentative and final or parcel map shall be approved pursuant to Title 25. Subdivisions. B. Project Design. 1. Driveway parking for a nnnuinnunn of 5NO of the units shall be provided when units are anachec by side. 2. A maximum of sit unuts may be attached side by side and an offset on the front of the buddane nninnnlunn of four feet for every tn-o units shall be provided. 3. A nunuunn of one-third of the roof area within a nruhi-stone. nndti-tout buildule shall be one s less in heieht than the remaining portion of the suuct re's roof area. • In the project's Attachment # 10, pg 41, the City strikethrough in red the language of PUD and small lot sizes. Question-why does the agenda list this project as a PUD with a ' "lots with reduced sizes"? This is fraud and misleading. What is this a play on words? Please show me the HBZSO's zoning code for" "lots with reduced 2 sizes"? 21-644 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 20-002, ZONIN( AMENDMENT (ZMA) NO. 20-002, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19136, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 20-024, MIl NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) NO. 20-002 (GISLER RE REQUEST: To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipubl (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Reslden, Density (RL); to amend the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density; to sut 13.9 gross acre site into a Planned Unit Development prm single family residential numbered lots with reduced size and 15 lettered lots for private streets, open space, and la to allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6 foo wall/fence; to analyze the potential environmental impact! proposed project. • Small Lot Development-This project is a small lot development because the minimum lot size is below the Residential Low Density (RL) size of 6,000 sq, ft. The minimum lot size for this project is 4,661 sq. ft, which means it needs to be zoned per the Small Lot Development standard found under HBZSO. 230.34. 3 21-644 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 20-002, ZONING M AMENDMENT (ZMA) NO. 20-002, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (T' 19136, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 20-024, MITIG, NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) NO. 20-002 (GISLER RESIC REQUEST: To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Density (RL); to amend the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density; to subdi) 13.9 gross acre site into a Planned Unit Development project single family residential numbered lots with redu d size am and 15 lettered lots for private streets, open space, an to allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6 foot to wall/fence; to analyze the potential environmental impacts of proposed project. Here is the real fraud. The Staff is aware that per HBZSO 230.34, Small Lot Developments are NOT permitted in a Residential Low Density district.(RL). This is why the Staff is calling the project a "lots with reduced sizes". This is Fraud. The project is not a PUD because the residents are not attached and the lot sizes are below 6000sq, which means they are small lot developments. Deny this project. 4 21-644 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 20-002, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (ZMA) NO. 20-002, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) N 19136, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 20-024, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) NO. 20-002 (GISLER RESIDENTI REQUEST: To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RL); to amend the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density; to subdivid a 13.9 gross acre site into a Planned Unit Development project single family residential numbered lots with reduced size a wide and 15 lettered lots for private streets, open space, and landscaph to allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6 foot tall wall/fence; to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. s Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 8:3S AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Residential Plans for Gilser Park Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Christina Fenner<cafenner525@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 28, 2021 8:33 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Residential Plans for Gilser Park Good \9ornin-= - I am writing on behalf of my entire family and the Huntington Beach sports community. We all know that a developer wants the Gisler Park land for home development. But we also know that their plans need to be approved and the land needs to be rezoned. I am begging VOL] not to approved the plans and the rezoning. I know there is a rumor that "Gisler Park is not used" and this could not be further from the truth. My two daughters have been on numerous sports teams that have used Gislcr Park extensively. Their teams are not the only ones!! Every evening, every weekend there is a sporting event or practice oCCurring. Often, our coaches needed to change practice times or days to find MORE field space because Gisler is so utilized. If Gisler is taken away, it will impact EVERY youth sports team in Huntington Beach. Gisler is a prized park in the fact that it has field lighting available. It is the only park/field that has the lighting and the size. There would be no other place for teams to practice after dark, and once the time changes there will be NO fields for the teams to play with lighting. As a mother of young daughters, this poses a hues safety issue. Appropriate lighting is needed for evening practices and games for EVERYONE's safety. Gisler offers that safety. The other fields in the City do not. t I do not understand why Huntington Beach is slowly taking away every green space to build more homes. Our fields and parks are such a precious commodity to the families that live in Huntington Beach, and I feel like the City isjust taking them away for more and more homes. We do not need more homes in Huntington Beach. We need to update and maintain our parks to KEEP families in Huntington Beach. Taking away field space and parks will only hurt families like mine of Huntington Beach. Gisler IS used - and used a lot- 1 cannot even fathom why someone would imply that it is not used or needed. That is a bold face lie. Whoever believes this obviously has never stepped foot on Gisler. Gisler IS needed. The community at large does NOT want Gisler to be developed or rezoned- We want the Gisler to remain as is for the families. Gisler contains over 20% of our local soccer fields. That equates to five large fields for games. Losing the field space would cause an enormous negative impact on youth soccer. There simply arc not enough fields left. Losing Gisler would be a complete disaster, and one that the city and vouth sports could never recover from. I beg of you, from our family and all ofthe families in Huntington Beach, please do NOT approve the development plans or rezone Gisler. Keep Gisler for the youth of Huntington Beach, for my daughters and all the sons and daughters of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Christina Fenner 2 Roland and Michelle Weedon 21831 Summerwind Lone Huntington Beach, CA 92646 September 28, 2021 Dear Mayor Carr and City Council Members, I understand that city funds for parks and city services are critically needed here in Huntington Beach, especially during the last year and a half with the pandemic. And for that matter, I understand that refurbishing or adding new equipment and facilities to our parks and plans have been put on hold this year. I also know that housing development is relatively unpopular in our city. However, occasionally you have before you proposals that are more acceptable than the high- density development we have seen proposed lately. I believe we have to consider development, since the developer's fees are the only way for us to acquire funds for parks, public safety, capital improvement and infrastructure projects. I have reviewed the plans for the new homes at the school site on Strathmoor and I am familiar with Brookfield as a homebuilder. It is my opinion that these new homes would be more beneficial financially than leaving the property "as is". Eighty-Five single-family detached homes are a much better fit than townhomes or apartments in this neighborhood, and Brookfield is a solid, reputable homebuilder that I believe will create even higher value. From what I've read, the developer's fees for this project will contribute greatly toward our parks, infrastructure, and public safety. It's hard to say no to those dollars in these times. And, when a low-density project comes along, it's hard to say no to that as well. Let's replenish our city revenues and say yes to new housing in this location. Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Weedon Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 9:51 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Pending approval Gisler site Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca -----Original Message----- From: JOANNE COLLEY<jcolley486@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 9:42 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.com mission @surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Pending approval Gisler site As a long time resident of Huntington Beach and member of the immediate community impacted by the proposed 85 single home project on the former Gisler Middle School site I would like to inform the members of the Planning Commission that I support the approval of this project. I have witnessed the steady decline and deterioration of the site with utilization by the homeless and as a nexus of criminal activity, specifically illegal drug trafficking that endangers our youth and the community. It's time to put a stop to this and approval of an appropriate , high quality housing project such as the one proposed is imperative. Please vote to approve and start the process of neighborhood enhancement in Huntington Beach. Sent from my Whone r Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 10:05 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: redevelopment of Gisler Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Kirsten Doutt Batley<traveldoutt@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 9:56 AM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: redevelopment of Gisler Good morning, Please, please consider the needs of our existing community regarding the already limited field space when looking at the plan for the Gisler site. The school district has already sold off unused school land to developers who have built homes that families have moved into. This development brings more children who now need to attend schools (that become more crowded) and then also wish to play youth sports. We have so few fields available for sports! Furthermore, we have no fields in the area with LIGHTS. Please save this space for our children in HB!! We use this field all the time! My boys (11 and 13) have had soccer practice there for years in the spring and fall. There is so much usage that sometimes practices go late into the evening, and well past sundown. Losing this field with nowhere else to go will not only hurt the sports programs but hurt our quality of life. What is the plan for providing more space with lights if Gisler is taken away? We need space, not money. We have this space, please allow us to continue using it. t Please do your civic duty for the residents of the city and save this space for us! Thank you for your time and consideration. Kirsten Batley Augusta Circle, HB 92646 2 Gisler Residential Project City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission Meeting September 28, 2021 Ink __ _ - y • -- � 1 A�IIIIl �II{illlll{ ��I ��� ��! !!lill� Brookfield "ULxlU4.;1 iClc31 Gisler Residential Project 85 Single Family Homes BLUEFIELD DRIV �¢{ " 0' 5TREET I � �r • J, AI�I In :t Ir i ,: O :n 'A" STREETlm — r M64 AA nr o t tl J u ! --. I e L L ILA r I t I b.ye aI L—. l e qll L_ •{II Lr"I r �_1A1L--.tr_! r " E " STREET r ,, 1 J ILL" I, 5 J 1 ] I L O T Brookfield HB Planning Commission Meeting - September 28, 2021 2 Former Gisler School • Gisler Park Brookfield Ay t e Brookfield Thank-you .... ;�-- Brookfield Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 1:26 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Brookfield Residential, Gisler property Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Cunununity Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center- Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca..gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA-Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Terry Crowther <terry@ticrowther.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 12:33 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Brookfield Residential, Gisler property Dear Planning Commission. My wife and I live at 21 191 Richmond Circle and are in support of the 85 single family home development beinu proposed by Brookfield providing the lots can not be split and the buyers can not add a rental unit to their property. Sinccrclv. Terry N-, Sharon Crowther 11 Crowther - Life Sculptor 949-422-0476 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ticrowthersculptor/ I Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 1:27 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Gisler Residential Support Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA(Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca -----Original Message----- From: Maria Spurgeon <maria.spurgeon3@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 28, 2021 1:25 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler Residential Support Dear Planning Commission, We are residents of the neighborhood where Brookfield is planning to build homes. In fact we live on Strathmoor Lane right across from the school. All of our neighbors will be impacted by your decisions but there are about 12 of us who are on the "front line" so to speak. Our neighborhood exemplifies all that is wonderful about Huntington Beach. While it was lovely to have Brethern Christian school as our neighbor, it is obvious that necessary repairs to the building make it it too expensive for a school to move in. Financially speaking, HBCSD must sell this valuable property and upgrade Sowers 1H. Brookfield has offered the best and most logical solution.The homes will add value to our neighborhood and maintain the continuity of single family homes. Moreover, Brookfield has been completely transparent and inclusive throughout the past 18 months. We ask you to approve all measures today so this project can move forward. It is nerve-wracking to wait and wonder what will become of our neighborhood and having a stable plan to focus on is in the best interest of all parties. Thank you for your time and consideration. Cordially, Darrin and Maria Spurgeon 1 Sent from my Whone 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Siordia, Isela Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 2:08 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Gisler site Isela Siordia Administrative Secretary Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach 714-536-5271 The City of Huntington Beach's new electronic permit processing system HB ACA (Accela Citizen Access) is now open for submittals! Please read all instructions for setting up an account and submitting applications online through HB ACA before submitting a new application. If you have any questions on the submittal process after reading the instructions link below, please contact us at permitcenter@surfcity-hb.org. ***HB ACA Help Center—Instructions to read before you apply online: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/help-center/ ***HB ACA—Apply Online Here: https://huntingtonbeachca.gov/aca From: Greg Ahmann <greg.ahmann@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 2:02 PM To: Planning Commission <planning.commission@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler site Planning Commission, I am a H13 resident of 22 vears, live at 20582 Egret Ln, Huntington Beach, we have watched field after field disappear for developers who come in and build more houses. I have no problem with houses. I am in the construction industry also. I do have a problem Nvith losing our athletic fields for money and no new fields. Please address this with the developer and stake sure we still have some fields with lights carved out at the Gisler site. All my kids played AYSO soccer on those fields and it would be tragic to lose another athletic field for all the families of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Greg Altmann t Brookfield G°3ess do nUd Gisler Neighborhood Planning Commission Hearing September 28, 2021 Table of Contents I. Community Outreach Summary II. Community Outreach Timeline III. Example Support Letters Community Outreach Program The primary purpose of our Community Outreach program was to engage our surrounding neighbors, Huntington Beach residents, and community organizations to solicit their feedback and work together to find solutions that meet the needs of the Gisler community. Process Our community outreach program commenced in July 2020 with our team knocking on doors in the neighborhood to introduce the project and begin gathering input. In order to disseminate information about Brookfield Residential's proposal for the re-use of the Huntington Beach City School District's Gisler school property, we: • Walked door-to-door to meet our immediately adjacent neighbors; • Held 3 large group meetings; • Met individually with neighbors and offered additional meetings as often as necessary; • Continue to meet one-on-one with neighbors and other interested parties; • Created a website with up-to-date information; • Provided a project-specific e-mail address for neighbors to engage with us; and • Sent e-mail updates periodically. Examples of Neighbor Participation Feedback from neighbors is critical to the success of any project, since they know the neighborhood best, including traffic patterns, demographics, existing conditions, etc. We had valuable input provided over the duration of the program, which helped to shape the project in the following ways: • Reduction in the number of homes to help address traffic concerns; • Realignment of the entrance on Effingham to Strathmoor to help reduce speeds on Effingham and Strathmoor; • Park improvements including additional and wider pathways and new and safer play equipment; • Architectural designs to complement existing residences; • Adjustment of lot sizes and setbacks adjacent to existing homes to address privacy concerns; and • Strategic placement of windows to minimize views into neighboring properties. The Gisler Re-Use team diligently pursued ways for the new neighborhood to fit into the existing surrounding neighborhoods by: • incorporating the local style into our architectural concepts; • providing a variety of home elevations in sizes compatible with surrounding homes; • addressing traffic and public safety concerns; • examining and increasing setbacks of the new development; and • improving the neighborhood park for all to enjoy. Every aspect of the Gisler re-use plan was created with the current residents in mind, as well as the welfare of the city. Timeline of Community Outreach from July 2020 to Present July 13, 2020 Neighborhood walk July 2020-Present Continued communication with neighbors and stakeholders, in-person and electronic August 11, 2020 Virtual Community Meeting#1 August 22, 2020 One-on-one meetings with neighbors September 2, 2020 One-on-one meetings with neighbors November 9, 2020 Fall E-blast announcing security fence November 13, 2020 Tour of Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley December 15, 2020 Presentation to HB Kiwanis Club members December 20, 2020 Holiday E-blast January 28, 2021 Virtual Community Meeting N2 February 5, 2021 One-on-one meetings with neighbors March 11, 2021 E-blast regarding sampling on property March 12-19, 2021 Meetings w/directly adjacent neighbors to discuss wall options March 26, 2021 E-blast regarding tree removal on city property March-Sept. 2021 Meetings w/directly adjacent neighbors to discuss wall options August 25, 2021 Virtual Community Meeting 93 September, 2021 One-on-one follow-up meetings with neighbors September 21, 2021 Eblast regarding website update October 16, 2021 Sponsorship of Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley Gala Brookfield Community <esiaentiai Meetings August 2020 Webinar,complete with Polling questions and Follow-Up Survey Elmluhwh]boles Ion and to meebl0 with you and hearing hom hue conwrx AV in we store our prnbrnnary pans W the proled Wawa sand Your questions,mrmrerss said NedbwA to How To Join The Webinar Mon Aug 10.2020 s 70 PM-5 00 PM PDT Add lu Calendar,A oos*tNerdar I coDgN(elendM"I rear 1.Cask sr anti to IeU er waMnn at Via specid Was and Apr. s NON "n nw snasd not bs - .ngusb)OU A - Iparq,be aur,to It,SYOIO MY t ,Ir n i,wes i Cawoas MN of Vas Mlowing audio options'. TO USE YOUR COMPUTER-S AUOIO When Ins wabner beans you will tie cnnnMted to audio ussla vas runs utels Virtual large group meeting in August 2021 W4 Fri 'i_ BrnokM1Nd rim 25. 2021 1 BOARD OF TRUSTEES �� HUNTINGTON BEACH Bridget Kaub • Shari Kowalke �,® C I I Y 5 C H 00 L DISTRICT Diana Marks • Paul Morrow, Ed.D. •Ann Sullivan Superintendent: Leisa Winston, Ed.D. September 22, 2021 Mr. Alan Ray Chairperson, Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Members of the Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: SUPPORT FOR THE APPROVAL OF GISLER SCHOOL— CONVERSION TO RESIDENTIAL LAND USE As the City is aware, the Huntington Beach City School District (District) is in escrow to sell the Gisler Middle School site property to Brookfield. As the dynamics of student generation and demographics shift, surplus property revenue has become critical to our ongoing improvements to our facilities. Brookfield has developed a plan that is consistent with surrounding development and the single-family residential land use framework that has already been established in the neighborhood. Like other former school sites in Orange County, these locations become homes for families that generate students and property taxes, which are necessary revenue sources for the District. The proceeds from this sale will be used primarily to fund the modernization or reconstruction of Sowers Middle School and pay off some of the District's long-term debt. Some of the important benefits of these improvements include developing collaborative spaces, improving natural light, improving technology infrastructure, and most importantly, creating innovative 21st-century learning environments for our students. Without the sale of this property, the District would not have the critical funds available to implement these improvements and equitable learning environments between the district's two middle schools, Sowers and Dwyer, which has already been modernized. We recognize AYSO's interest in lighted soccer fields and appreciate our long-standing relationship, as they use the majority of our fields and we acknowledge the value that soccer provides to Huntington Beach youth. We are working with Brookfield to explore additional field options within the District. District staff are committed to working with Brookfield, which has provided funding to further study opportunities and constraints at several District locations. Brookfield has also indicated they are willing to contribute $250,000 toward a possible alternative. We are working diligently to conclude this study as soon as possible and will continue to work with all parties. The HBCSD Board of Trustees has not committed any additional funds toward an alternative lighted field. It is important to recognize that the District's core mission is to provide an educational program that supports the academic and personal development of every student, and the funds from this sale would be fully expended to improve the Sowers Middle School learning environment in support of this goal. We respectfully request the Planning Commission to approve the project on September 28 so the District can maintain its schedule, complete the transaction and close escrow in the next few months. Sincerely, Leisa Winston, Ed.D. Superintendent 8750 Dorsett Drive Huntington Beach California 92646 (714) 964-8888 ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL 2 Park Plaza, Suite 1001 Irvine, CA 92614 1 P 949.476.22421 F 949.476.04431 www.ocbc.org September 27, 2021 Mr. Alan Ray Chair, Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92646 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposed New Homes at Gisler Site - SUPPORT Dear Chair Ray and Planning Commissioners, Orange County Business Council (OCBC), the leading voice of business in Orange County, is pleased to support Brookfield Residential's proposal to build much-needed housing at the former Gisler school property. One of OCBC's core initiatives is to advocate for the development of new housing to meet the current and future needs of Orange County's diverse workforce. OCBC's research on Orange County's housing needs includes the 2019-20 Workforce Housing Scorecard, which identifies an existing 58,000-unit shortfall countywide—which is expected to balloon to 114,000 units by 2045 without significant action. Employees of local Huntington Beach businesses especially benefit from new housing opportunities, as they must otherwise commute to work from other cities within or outside of Orange County, increasing congestion and preventing them from living where they work. Brookfield's proposal to add to the City's housing supply by reusing the former Gisler school site helps address the need for housing for numerous demographics. This low- density project provides opportunities for residents with growing families and empty nesters alike to find a new home, freeing their current residences for others looking for a "move-Up" opportunity. In addition to new tax revenue and economic development impacts, this proposal will also bring in new jobs during construction and new customers for local businesses. OCBC respectfully asks the Planning Commission to consider the numerous, invaluable benefits this development will offer to residents, the surrounding business community and the City of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, /Mw�- t/l— Jennifer Ward Senior Vice President of Advocacy and Government Affairs cc: Members, Huntington Beach Planning Commission THE LEADING VOICE OF BUSINESS IN ORANGE COUNTY 9/28/21. 2:10 PM Gmail-Brookfield Project/Gisler School MGmail Gisler Neighborhood <gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com> Brookfield Project/Gisler School Pam Bertsch <pam.bertsch@yahoo.com> Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:32 PM To: 'cfikes@surfcity-hb.org" <cfikes@surfcity-hb.org>, "rramos@surfcity-hb.org" <rramos@surfcity-hb.org>, .'rhonda.bolton@surfcity-hb.org" <rhonda.bolton@surfcity-hb.org>, "Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org" <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>, "mike.posey@surfcity-hb.org" <mike.posey@surfcity-hb.org>, "natalie.moser@surfcity-hb.org" <natalie.moser@surfcity- hb.org>, "dan.kalmick@surfcity-hb.org" <dan.kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>, "erik.peterson@surfcity-hb.org" <erik.peterson@surfcity-hb.org>, "barbara.delgleize@surfcity-hb.org" <barbara.delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>, "PLANNING.COMMISSION@SURFCITY-HB.ORG" <PLANNING.COMM ISSION@surfcity-hb.org> Dear Mayor Carr and City Council, I am a resident in the immediate neighborhood of the proposed development at the Gisler school property. As a matter of fact, my home will share a wall with the new neighbors. I support the plans for 85 homes. I believe this is the best use for the property, since it will no longer be used as a school. The property is public property, yes, but it is not open space. The school district decided to close the public school, the private school vacated, and now the property sits, vacant. It is a magnet for illicit activity. The fact remains, the school district decided to sell. With that sale, a new use for the property must be decided on. What is the best use? Not industrial, not commercial. The property rests right in the middle of single-family detached homes and a park. The logical conclusion is that this property must be zoned for housing. For it to remain as open space, someone or some organization would have to purchase it at fair market value, an amount that would guarantee the most funds possible to return to the district to be used elsewhere at schools within the district. The city cannot afford to purchase the property for parkland, and no other person or entity has come forward with millions of dollars to purchase this land and leave it as open space. Again, the logical conclusion is for this property to be utilized for homes. Thankfully, the developer has proposed to build a low-density neighborhood of homes more like the current neighborhood. With mandates currently coming out of the state to increase density even in low-density neighborhoods, i.e. SB9, I want to ensure that our neighborhood is planned well. Brookfield Residential's plan gives us this option. Single-family homes. Opportunity for input. Improvements to our park. And, to help address the loss of soccer fields, Brookfield has offered funds to help replace the lighted field elsewhere for AYSO. Furthermore, property taxes are a major factor in new funding for the HBCSD. These units would generate more funds for our local schools. Please approve this project and let's get it built before the state dictates the use for us. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Pam Bertsch 21121 Cocobana Lane https://ma il.goog le.com/mail/u/0?ik=bd432c590d&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f-/.3A 1 7120961 06 7 7 9584 005&simpl=msg-f°/n3A 17120961067... 1/2 9/28/21,2:10 PM Gmail-Brookfield ProjecYGisler School Huntington Beach, CA 92646 "If a fellow isn't thankful for what he's got, he isn't likely to be thankful for what he's going to get." htlps://mail.google.con/mail/u/07ik=bd432c590d&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A1712096106779584005&simpl=msg-f%3A 17120961067... 2/2 9/28/21.2:10 PM Gmail-I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property MGmail Gisler Neighborhood <gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com> I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property BLAIR CAMPBELL <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:40 PM Reply-To: 6LAIRCAMPBELL777@gmail.com To: Kim.carr@surfcity-hb.org, Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org, erik.peterson@surfcity-hb.org, mike.posey@surfcity-hb.org, barbara.delgleize@surfcity-hb.org, Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org, nata lie.moser@surfcity-hb.org, cfikes@surfcity-hb.org, city.council@surfcity-hb.org, farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org, gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com 09/27/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much-needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, BLAIR CAMPBELL BLAI RCAMPBELL777@GMAIL.COM (714) 222-3586 8532 LARTHORN DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 https://mail.goog le.com/mail/u/0?ik=bd432c590d&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f-/.3Al 7120941633316078918simpl=msg-f%3A17120941633... 1/1 9/28/21. 1:56 PM Gmail-I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property MGmail Gisler Neighborhood <gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com> I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Maria Spurgeon <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 1:29 PM Reply-To: maria.spurgeon3@gmail.com To: Kim.carr@surfcity-hb.org, Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org, erik.peterson@surfcity-hb.org, mike.posey@surfcity-hb.org, barbara.delgleize@surfcity-hb.org, Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org, natalie.moser@surfcity-hb.org, cfikes@surfcity-hb.org, city.council@surfcity-hb.org, farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org, gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com 09/28/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much-needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Maria Spurgeon maria.spurgeon3@gnail.com (480) 570-0303 21192 Strathmoor Ln HB, CA 92646 https://mail.google.corn/mail/u/0?ik=bd432c590d&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f%3A l 712179894326020655&simpl=msg-f%3A 17121798943.,. 111 Ramos, Ricky From: Carolyn Thompson <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:10 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/28/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City 0f Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Fonner Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COUI1Cilmernbers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Althounh Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benelits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeICSS population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As huntin"toll Beach residents. we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Pleasc approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Carolyn Thompson nlozinhb cr aol.com (714) 263-6649 t 9562 Blacklin Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Larry Waterhouse <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 3:02 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92C>46@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/27/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City off-Iuntineton Beach 2000 Main Street Huntineton Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of-the Former Gisler Middlc School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of'quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits Will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds Irom the sale of the property will help the school district to address nuich- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both vouna adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntineton Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for c0mnutnity input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Larry Waterhouse mackwater@aol.com aol.com (714) 402-5312 t 21 101 Indiso Circle huntineton beach. CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: alicia waterhouse <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 3:01 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad,- gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/27/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Fluntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middlc School Property Dear Mayor and City COt1nCIh1lembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition ofquality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the nei_hborhood. Additionally, fiords Rom the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would brine new homes for both voung adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before VOL]. Sincerely, alicia waterhouse mackwater n aol.com (7 14) 402-83 12 t 21 101 Indigo Circle hunting-ton beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Coleen Kaae <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 8:55 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/28/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COUnellmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal fora new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additional[\,, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Bcach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore. providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As I-luntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Coleen Kaae ckaaehb a email.com (7 14) 277-6243) t 21 101 Red Jacket Cir Fluminelon Beach, CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Adam Kaae <no-reply@gislerneighborhood com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 8:50 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/28/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council Citv of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street luntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use ofthe Former Gisler Middle School Property Dcar Mavor and City COL11161members: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, hinds from the sale of'the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time. shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-,rowing homeless population and bliuht. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential fir unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both youne adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Bench families wanting- to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Adapt Kaae aclanikaac@gmail.com gmail.com (714) 964-1414 t 21 101 Red Jacket Cir HLlnhnuton Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: David Thompson <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:12 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/28/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City ofl-luntiniton Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale ofthe property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and 1-11,111tington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As 1-1 Lint iLimon Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, David Thompson dthbsurfuaol.com (714) 673-8812 t 9562 Blacktin Circic Huntington Beach, CA 92646 z Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 4:00 PM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: (Resend) Public Comment - Development of Gisler Middle School Property by Brookfield Homes From: Dan McDonald <djmcdonald@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 28, 2021 3:37 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: (Resend) Public Comment - Development of Gisler Middle School Property by Brookfield Homes Hi there, As per the subject, I want to add my voice, as a resident with taco young children, to the voices expressing concern over the loss of Gisler field. AYSO Region 56 is a volunteer, non-profit that provides our kids with something so needed these days: opportunities for kids to be outside and enjoy sport. The city really needs to work on a lon term fix for the South East youth sport organizations having to double up on school fields. Surely we can do better than this, ifnothing else for the kids. But the immediate issue is the loss of AYSO Region 56's only full-size field and the only one with lights. The field is not "in use" as school grounds, but anyone who's in the area knows it is "in use" by the kids--never something I would characterize as an "unwanted activity". I think it not unreasonable at least for the city to work with the developer to ensure alternative Field use With lights if the city does indeed believe community-based programs like AYSO Region 56 are important. It would be easy to show that by making approval of this project dependent on securing alternate facilities. Many thanks. Dan McDonald South Last Resident t Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 1:49 PM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Maria Spurgeon <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 1:29 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@ surf city-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 09/28/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Mcmbers of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middlc School Property Dear Mayor and City COnnCllmeinbers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address nnuh- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become maLnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both voting adults who want to move back to their hometown and I-iuntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this ranee helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely. Maria Spurgeon nuu'ia.snurgeon3 ��gnwil.com (480) 570-0303 21 192 Strathmoor Ln HB. CA 92646 2 Ramos, Ricky From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 8:17 AM To: De Coite, Kim Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Gisler School site Hi Kim, More comments about Gisler. Sandie From: Maria Jones<rmjones4@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, September 24, 2021 2:40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler School site To The City Council, We have lived in our home in the Gisler Track since 1978. We have raised two children, who are now grown and have families of their own. They were able to play soccer and baseball on these fields. We were able to walk down Cocobana to the fields and watch them play. When I told them about the City's plan to build homes on "their fields they were deeply saddened that in the future other families would not have the same experiences they had. We feel that these are "our" fields and should remain that way. Please reconsider your plans and KEEP OUR FIELDS!!!!! Thank you, The Jones Family 1 Ramos, Ricky From: john bowerbank <jebowerbank@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 12:34 AM To: Planning Commission Subject: Setting aside fields for open space at Gisler while still developing a part of it like what occurred at Seaview Little League HB Planning Commission, I have been a resident and voter in HB since 2003. My kids play AYSO soccer and baseball with Seaview Little League. I sincerely hope that you will limit the development to where the former school (Brethren) is located and that you keep the fields as open space for the benefit of the community, like you and the council (including Jill Hardy) at the time masterfully did with Seaview Little League. There can be a win-win here. I am not going to simply say don't sell a portion where the school was located. However, you really owe it to the City to maintain the open space and fields so residents can have sports and activities for decades to come. South Huntington is and should continue to be a place where families raise their kids. Respectfully, John Bowerbank Attorney, Resident and Property Owner of Properties in HB Sent from my iPhone 1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Gisler Residential Project a9 Atl•nb Am' - G�$*,Prk I a � � a y y • old _ � -_ —_� ` September 2021 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction and Summary.............................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 List of Commenters.............................................................................................................................2-1 3.0 Responses to Comments...................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Local Agencies .......................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Organizations......................................................................................................................3-13 3.3 Individuals............................................................................................................................3-19 4.0 Revisions As Part of The Final IS/MND........................................................................................4-1 4.1 Revisions to the Text of the IS/MND.............................................................................4-1 4.1.1 Section 1.3.4 Existing Setting.............................................................................4-1 4.1.2 Section 3.0, Project Description........................................................................4-2 4.1.3 Section 8.18, Tribal Cultural Resources ........................................................4-2 4.2 Revisions to the Exhibits...................................................................................................4-S GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank ii GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFP IS/MND 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this clocument is to present public comments and responses to those comments received on the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) for the Gisler Residential Project. The City of Huntington Beach, as the Lead Agency, has evaluated all substantive comments and has prepared written responses. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines ("Title 14 California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15074[b]), the decision-making body of the Lead Agency must consider the IS/MND and comments received before approving the Project. This document, which will he provided to the Planning Commission and City Council, as the decision-making bodies, has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and represents the independent judgment of the Lead Agency. The approximate 13.64-acre Project site is in the southeastern portion of the City of Huntington Beach, in Orange County,California.The site is located at 21141 Strathmoor Lane and is generally surrounded by single-family residential to the north,east and west,with Gisler Park to the south. A City parking lot is also located to the east.The site is approximately 3.6 miles south of Interstate 405 (1-405); 1.4 miles north of State Route 1 (SR-1); and 2.5 miles west of SR-SS. The proposed Gisler Residential Project would involve construction of an 8S-unit single-family detached residential development on an approximately 13.64-acre site with a density of 6.23 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). The existing vacant building and associated site improvements would be demolished to accommodate the proposed Project. As a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the homes are proposed on approximately minimum 4,661 sf lots, with a minimum lot width of 50 feet (ft).The proposed development would include three plan types, with three elevation styles for each plan. The plans range from approximately 2,800 sf to 3,300 sf in size, with up to five bedrooms and three bathrooms,and two- or three-car garages. Rear yards range from minimum depths of 22±ft internally to more than 40 ft along the western and southern property lines. The proposed residences would all be solar-equipped and energy efficient and in compliance with the strict Building Efficiency Standards - Title 24 mandated in the 2019 code update. Additional information regarding the proposed Project's energy efficiency is provided in Section 3.0 of this IS/MND. The proposed development would be accessed only from Strathmoor Lane, and a 24-foot wide emergency access is also proposed from Bluefield Drive to the north of the site. The layout of the internal streets is similar to the adjacent residential developments. Landscaping is proposed throughout the community, and improvements are proposed to the existing active open space immediately to the south at the Gisler Park. In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15073, the Draft IS/MND was circulated for a 20-day public review and comment period beginning on July 22, 2021 and ending on August 10, 2021. Additionally, the Draft IS/MND was available at the City of Huntington Beach website. During the public review period, the City received a total of six comment letters from a local agency, an organization, and individuals on the Draft IS/MND. Written responses have been GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 1-1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Introduction and Summmy prepared to all comments received during the comment period and are included in Section 3.0 of this document. The Final IS/MND consists of three documents: (1) the Draft IS/MND; (2) the Technical Appendices; and (3) the Responses to Comments document. The Responses to Comments document includes three sections: Section 1.0, provides the introduction; Section 2.0 provides a list of commenters on the Draft IS/MND; Section 3.0 provides responses to environmental comments received on the environmental document; and Section 4.0 includes the revisions to the text of the Draft IS/MND. 1-2 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND 2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS The following is a list of commenters that submitted written comments on the Draft IS/MND.The comments included written and e-mail correspondence. The comments are listed chronologically and numbered. The responses have been prepared to match the bracketing on the comment letters. Each comment letter is followed by responses to address the comments. The comment letters and responses are included in Section 3.0 of this document. No. Commenter Date of Page Correspondence Number Local Agencies 1 I City of Huntington Beach, Environmental Board August 10,2021 Organizations 2 1 Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN) August 3,2021 Individuals 3 Nancy Goodfellow (NG) July 27, 2021 4 Terry McClary (TN1C) August 3,2021 5 Jeannie Bailey(IB) August 5,2021 6 Kathy Hamilton (KFI) August 8,2021 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 2-1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/HIND List of Commenters This page intentionally left blank 2-2 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRA[q IS/MND 3.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS The City's responses to comments received on the Draft IS/MND are provided below. The responses are numbered to match the bracketing on the comment letter. Comment letters received are categorized by local agencies, organizations, and individuals. Within each category, the responses are provided chronologically. 3.1 LOCAL AGENCIES One comment letter was received from the organizations. The comment letter is listed below: • City of Huntington Beach, Environmental Board (HBEB)—August 10, 2021 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments This page intentionally left blank 3-2 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments «� fetter 6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH N5 2000 MAIN STREET,HUWINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648-2702 ' ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD City of Huntington Beach August 10,2021 Planning Division To:Alan Ray,Chair, Planning Commission Cc:Ricky Ramos,Senior Planner Regarding:Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No.20-002 for Gisler Residential Environmental Board Comments on the construction of 85 single-family residences on a 13.9- acre site located at 21141 Stratmoor Lane, Huntington Beach,CA 92646. The Environmental Board analysis is to better understand the likelihood of development occurring in the Gisler Residential project and what subsidies of other interventions might be required for the private developer to make the desired types of investments. The potential ITBEH-1 value of future development can then be measured against the necessary infrastructure investments to determine whether private development can pay for all of the infrastructure of whether public subside will he needed to complete the infrastructure improvements recommended in the earlier phase of the project. Observations At first glance it seems as if the developer has put in place all measures to ensure a robust and safe project for this community.After the project site is rezoned,it can be used to build the 80- single-family homes on the old Gisler school site.The report lists all safety and legal measures for that would apply for:drainage,dust,vibration,and traffic congestion that will occur because of this project. The developer also has mitigation steps in place to ensure they are at or below the prescribed legal limits that have been established for protecting the homes and HBFB-2 residents that lie withing the development area. With that said,here are a few things that we have questions or concerns about.Where noted, the section or page number have been listed. Section 2.2-States historic ground water has approached 3 feet below grade level,currently 10- 14 feet below surface. 1. With the current emphasis placed on Sea Level Rise,and this area located in a zone ITBEB-3 where infrastructure will be prone to Flooding based upon a moderate rise in sea level, what steps will be taken to mitigate the damage done to this rise is water? Page 1 of 4 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-3 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET, HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92 6 48-2 702 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD 2. What steps will be taken to put in place underground infrastructure that will not be HHEH-3 affected by rising water? Cont. Exhibit 3.1 Old fencing on map shows a current residence wall on the far west side of the project. 1. Will it be a common shared wall? 2. Who is responsible for the maintenance of the wall if the project falls under CCBR HHEB-4 regulations?Current'old'homeowner,or the new project homeowner? 3. Will the neighbors be paid compensation for damages done by putting in this new wall? i.e.,Removal of trees,shrubs,landscaping damage,etc. Section 3-2 There will be seven new homes that front Strathmoor Street. Driveways will be accessed at that point. These 7 will not be behind the planned gated community. 1. Does this need to be a gated community? 2. Will those seven homes be exempt from homeowner association fees since they will not HBFB-5 be behind the closed community gate? 3. This community is in one of the lowest crime rate areas in Huntington Beach. Does it really need to have a private access? 3.4 Landscape themes 1. Since we are in the midst of a drought,can steps be made to ensure that all homes are designed with drought resistant landscaping? 11BEB-6 2. Current designs call for no more that 50%of the land be taken up by the home's footprint,can there also be a 50%limit on the land left for hardscape? This will insure less Urban Heat buildup in that area,correct? 3.5 Construction 1. Is there away to fast-track construction? 2. Why will it take three years plus to build 80+homes? 3, Can the developer hold back a portion,put them on leased land,and create a portion HHEB-7 that are for economically disadvantaged,Low-income? Page 2 of 4 3-4 GISLER RFSIDFNTIAI. PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments / CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN Sl RM.HUNT INGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648-2702 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD Exhibit 3-8 1. 3.5.1 Item number 8,the pin-drop location is missing from the map.Can it be re-done to show the location? HHEH-H 2. 3.5.3 Can the developer put in place mitigation steps to address future Sea Level Rise for all structures and infrastructures? 5.0 Environmental Factors 1. Can the developer do some testing to ensure that the land is not on some old hazardous HHEB-9 landfill of some type? 2. Developer states that records going back to 1938 show it was a field.Couldn't that field have been lop covering for waste from the oil industry decades earlier? 8.22 Table Vibration Damage 1. Report states that the City of IIB has"no standards in place for structural damage due to HIRER.10 vibration or for annoyance."Is this true? 2. Report has a vibration damage chart with thresholds they say they will be under...who monitors those levels?Can residents check daily?Can levels be posted? 8.25 Table states the current northern and western homes will be the ones most impacted from the vibration and the annoyance of noise and dust. How can these residents find out if the builder is staying within their stated limits on all construction fronts? HBEB-I 1 The builder needs to stay within their prescribed hours of construction(7:30-5:00),noise, vibration,and dust issues for the health,welfare,and safety of the current residents. Since many are working from home these days,how will this affect their businesses? Finally,this refers to Urban Heat and the elimination of such heat. 1. Can the builder use roofing materials that meet or exceed the prescribed level to call a roof a"Cool roof'? 2. Can they build the streets with new asphalt material that is cooler than current asphalt HBEB-12 (This type of asphalt is available now)? 3. The CC&R's should call for residents to plan for using drought resistant plants and putting in less hardscape in order to help mitigate the rise in urban and to conserve on water. Page 3 of 4 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-5 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments l CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREFI,HUNTINGTON BEACH,CAUFORNIA 92648-2702 ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD In the end,there will be less traffic then in the past for the residents and the overall project will be a nice replacement for the school.Local kids will lose fields and a place to play in open areas, but there will be the improvements to the park which should remedy some of this. The main concerns are:the toll the 3 years of building will take on residents,environmental concerns (what really lies underground),sea level rise,urban heat,a gated community,and the fact that 7 homes will face Strathmoor St.and not be behind a gate.So,maybe these 7 homes can be on leased land as low-income qualifiers?That way the developer does not have to pay the city for HBF-B.13 not meeting the low-income/high density qualification model. The findings and review of the Gisler Residential project by your citizen appointed Environmental Board are intended to help and assist the planning commission with our review and evaluation of the Gisler Residential project providing our insights and review of the Draft Mitigated documents and its Appendix's. Environmental Board Members Tony Soriano—Chairman Bud Benneman—Vice-Chair K C Fockler—Board Member Kathleen McGowan—Board Member Joan Siegal—Board Member Page 4 of 4 3-6 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Letter 1: City of Huntington Beach, Environmental Board Comment Letter Dated August 10, 2021 HBF.B-1 The comment regarding the subsidies or other interventions required for the developer to make the desired investments is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. This is not a CEQA issue, and therefore, no further response is necessary. The comment also briefly reiterates the Project Description. The comment is noted. HBEB-2 The comment identifies that the environmental document includes measures that would address issues pertaining to drainage, dust, vibration, and traffic congestion and protect homes and residents in the area. 'file comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. No further response is required. Section 2.2 HBEB-3 file comment refers to the information pertaining to ground water in Section 2.2 of the environmental document and asks what steps will be taken to address sea level rise damage to the infrastructure. Your comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. In terms of potential for flooding overall, Section 8.10, Hydrology and Water Quality of the IS/MND provided an analysis and indicated that the proposed Project world include storage volume infrastructure that would provide the required storage and ensure that 25-year frequency storm event is not exceeded. Further, the storm drain system would be designed to accommodate 100-year flood flows, in accordance with Chapter 255 of the City's Municipal Code, the Orange Comity Hydrology Manual, and other City specifications. The proposed changes resulting from the Project site would not substantially increase the rate or amount of Surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or ofsite. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. More specifically, in terms of sea level rise, while the City's Final Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment was issued in May 2021, the City is at the initial stages of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) update, and no sea level rise development standards and requirements have been created thus far. Additionally, it should be noted that CEQA and CEQA Guidelines require new projects to mitigate their significant impacts on the environment. However, the issue of sea level rise is the impact of the environment on the Project (Reverse CEQA. In fact, in 2015 the California Supreme Court rejected "Reverse CEQA" analysis in CBIA v. BAAQMD. As demonstrated in the CBIA v. BAAQMD ruling, the impact of existing environmental conditions on a project is no longer under the purview of CEQA evaluation. As Such, the Project is not required to provide mitigation to address the issue of sea level rise. The comment also asks what steps will be taken to put in place underground infrastructure that will not be affected by rising water.As indicated above, Section 8.10, Hydrology and Water Quality of the IS/MND provided detailed analysis. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-7 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Please see the discussion above. Furthermore, a suggested condition of approval has been identified, which requires that the proposed storm drain system for the Project shall be constructed with water-tight joints to address inflow/infiltration into the pipe. Exhibit 3-1 HBEB-4 The comment questions the residence wall on the far west side of the Project and if it would be a common shared wall; the responsible party for the maintenance; and compensation for damages by constructing the new wall. Please note, there are five adjacent lots along the western boundary of the Project site. The vast majority of the existing wall is located entirely on the adjacent homeowners' properties; that has been confirmed via field survey. Through meetings with the adjacent homeowners, the Applicant has confirmed the adjacent property owners' preferences for the existing wall to be maintained or replaced with a new wall at the Applicant's expense. The perimeter wall condition post-development would be considered a "common shared wall," where a wall is located on a common lot line with the maintenance responsibility to be borne by both parties, the existing and future homeowners, for the wall section facing either property and along their shared property line. For perimeter wall sections outside of the proposed fee simple lots, the community's homeowners association (1-10A) would be responsible for maintenance of the wall. The new development does not alter the maintenance responsibilities between adjacent property owners. The Applicant has met with the adjacent property owners regarding the shared property line condition, and where appropriate, the Applicant will compensate existing homeowners for modifications and damage to their property due to the construction of the new wall. Exhibit 3-2 1113EB-5 The comment questions the seven new homes off St•athmoor Street and if they need to be a gated community and if the homes will be exempt from the 110A fees. The comment also questions the need to have a private access given the low crime rate. Please note, the proposed 85-unit single family development is not a gated community, nor has the Applicant ever proposed a gated residential community on the site of the former school. Regarding the seven hornes fronting St'athmoor Street, they are part of the proposed Project,and the Project is not a gated community.As part of the Project, the referenced homes would not be exempt from 110A fees. Additionally, as the proposed development is not a gated community, access to the Project is not restricted. 3-8 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments 3.4 Landscape Themes 1113EB-6 The comments regarding drought resistant landscaping and a 50 percent limit on land left for hardscape to ensure less Urban Heat buildup are noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. It should be noted that the Project's landscape design would be in accordance with all applicable codes and standards, including the latest water conservation measures required at the time of development. Regarding 50 percent limit on land used for hardscape, outside of the home's footprint, a nhininnum of 40 percent of the front yard is allocated to landscaping per the City's code requirements. No other landscaping requirement applies to the remainder of the residential lots. Additionally, the Project proposes deep real- yards with some extending up to 47 ft beyond the home's rear elevation along the western edge. This condition would provide an Opportunity for the future homeowner to landscape their back yards based on their preference. Regarding urban heat buildup, it is acknowledged that hard, dry surfaces such as roofs, sidewalks, roads, buildings, and parking lots provide Jess shade and moisture than natural landscapes and therefore contribute to higher temperatures. However, it should also be noted that heat island effect occurs as a result of several factors (e.g., urban materials properties, urban geometry, human activity, weather and geology,and more) and not just lack of higher percentage of landscaping (EPA 2021). Additionally, the Project is too small in the context of an urhan metropolitan area that is the main generator of heat island effect. Also, other residential developments in the area are of similar characteristics.Thus, the Project in and of itself would not significantly contribute to urban heat buildup effect in the area. 3.5 Construction HBEB-7 The comments regarding duration of construction; holding back a portion of the development; and creating a portion for low-income are noted and will he forwarded to the decision makers. The continents identified are not CEQA issues; however, it should be noted that projected construction timelines are the best available and are comparable in duration to other projects of similar size and scope. Additionally, from a cost standpoint, it is in the Applicant's best interest to develop and build this Project as efficiently as possible. Homebuilding is completed in phases, starting with the preparation of the site through utility installation and grading to support vertical housing construction. The site preparation is followed by sub-phases of housing production, where a select number of homes are built concurrently. This is common practice in the homebuilding industry as housing construction is associated with home sales absorption rates. In terms of low-income housing, the Applicant intends to comply with the City of Huntington Beach's Affordable Housing Ordinance. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-9 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT I$/MND Responses to Comments Exhibit 3-8 HBE13-8 The comments regarding the revision to the exhibit and mitigations to address Sea Level Rise are noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. Exhibit 3- 8 is hereby revised to include item number (8),and the revised exhibit is included in Section 4.0, Revisions as Part of the Final IS/MND. Regarding mitigation steps to address future Sea Level Rise for all structures and infrastructures, please refer to Response HBEB-3, above. 5.0 Environmental Factors HBEB-9 The comment questions potential hazards waste and old hazardous landfill beneath the Project site. The comment is noted. Section 8.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the IS/MND provided a detailed analysis of potential impacts pertaining to hazards and hazardous materials and made a determination that the impacts would be less than significant without mitigation. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared by Hillman Associates in addition to a Preliminary Subsurface Methane Gas and Soil Investigation prepared by GeoKinetics, both of which were used in preparation of Section 8.9, of the IS/MND. The analysis listed the notable environmental conditions that were identified (pages 8-54 and 8-55 of the IS/MND), but according to Phase I ESA, none of the conditions was considered a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) associated with the Project site. No evidence of RECs (either historical or controlled) was found on the site, and no additional assessment was recommended. The Project site is not listed as a facility that handled hazardous materials or generated hazardous wastes. Additionally, the results of the Preliminary Methane Gas Investigation and Pesticide Soil Sampling at the Project site indicated that the site is located within the Newport West Oil Field, as mapped by the California Geological Energy Management Divisions (CalGEM). No historical oil wells were shown to exist at the Project site; however, a plugged historical oil well (Gisler, "Tad "Travers" ft2) is located approximately 115 feet west of the site. Low detections of the pesticide Dichlor-o-Diplienyl-Dichloroethylene DDE were found in 7 of 30 soil samples that were analyzed. No methane gas was detected in any of the five shallow subsurface gas probes that were installed and monitored. The Investigation concluded that no mitigation is required. Thus, based on the studies conducted, the site is not underlain by hazardous waste or conditions that would result in a significant impact. Nevertheless, the Project has been required by the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department to follow City Specification No.431-29 for Soil Quality Standards.The Applicant must complete soil testing, and if necessary, conduct a clean-up to the satisfaction of the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to obtaining approval of building and grading plans. 3-10 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments 8.22 Table Vibration Damage IIBEB-10 The comments regarding vibration related issues are noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. This response confirms that there are no applicable City standards for structural damage from vibration. In the absence of City standards, the vibration clamage potential guideline thresholds of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) are used in the analysis instead. In terms of monitoring the vibration levels, the comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. While vibration impacts is a CEQA issue, the post development monitoring of vibration is not a CEQA issue, and as such no further response is warranted. However, it should he noted that the Applicant will follow regulations set forth by all regulating agencies regarding construction activity. During construction, the Applicant will self-monitor compliance with the aforementioned regulations, but appropriate agencies, including the City of Huntington Beach will provide periodic inspections as well. The Applicant has met with surrounding property owners and will document the existing condition of their property to ensue damage from the site's construction activity can he accurately identified and is appropriately addressed by the Applicant, at no cost to the adjacent property owner. Table 8.25 FIBEB-11 The concern about the homes to the north and west of the site being impacted by noise and dust and how the existing residents will find out if the limits of construction are honored, is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. Please note, the Applicant will follow regulations set forth by all regulating agencies regarding construction activity for the Project site. Additionally, the Applicant is required to post signage on the construction site with contact Information of entities regulating the site's construction activity. The comment also states that builder needs to comply with hours of construction, noise, vibration, and dust issue for the health and welfare and safety of the existing residents. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. The Applicant will follow regulations set forth by all regulating agencies regarding construction activity for this site. The Applicant has perfornned significant community outreach efforts in the surrounding neighborhood over the past year and has provided the contact information of the Project teann should the residents have concerns. The Applicant intends to continue this outreach and respond to concerns from neighbors throughout the development of this site. Additionally, as indicated above, the Applicant is required to post signage on the construction site with contact information of the Project team and government agencies regulating the site's construction activity. Thus, residents have been provided appropriate information to report construction activity outside permitted hours. HBEB-12 The comment identifies the issue of urban heat and lists a number ofnnechanisms to address the said issue. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-11 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT 1S/MND Responses to Comments decision makers. The issue of urban heat has been addressed above. Please refer to Response HBEB-6. Furthermore, it should be noted that proposed Project will comply with the latest building code requirements and City sheet standards, applicable at the time of construction. Regarding the issue of urban heat and landscaping, please refer to Response HBEB-6, above. Additionally, the proposed Project will comply with the appropriate building code requirements and City landscape standards applicable at the time of construction. IIBEB-13 The comment reiterates and summarizes the concerns in the continent letter. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. The above responses address the comments, and no further response is required. 3-12 GISLER RESIDENTIAL.PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments 3.2 ORGANIZATIONS One comment letter was received from the organizations. The comment letter is listed below: • Gabrieleno hand of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation (G13M1-KN)—August 3, 2021 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-13 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT I$/MND Responses to Comments 6a6rielcno 6anci of n^ission Inoians- hi7k Nation g better 2 ' ,ecoq+me by bc�w�aT(_.It,.m...n4.b.,nq-.:coke of J.c Lon A^y<.bd.:� 'W.-lPa August 3,2021 RE:Gisler Residential Project Located 21 141 Strathmoor Lane Huntington Beach Dear Ricky Ramos, The mitigation measures should be specific to TCR for purposes of complying with CEQA therefore please utilize the attached mitigation measures for your project These mitigation GBPII-KN-t measures are the property of the kizh nation and shall not be duplicated,reproduced,or used for the benefit of any third party without the kizh nation's prior written consent.Thank you hPf 70?-1 Pnor to the commencement of any grand disturbing acridly or the prgect site the pgeet applicant shah retain a Native American Morino,approved by the Gabrie/eno Hand of Mk ion lndiate-Kah Aanon-the tribe that conudted on this project pursuant to Assembly W/A52(the^Tribe^or the ^Cmvdting Tribe)A copy of the uecuted contract shall be submitted to the City a/Huntington Beach Bening and Building Dgowvrnmt prior to the rssnence of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing actnity The Trrbal monitor will ony be present on-site during the construcfim phases that inmim ground-disturbing,activities Crwnd disturbing nonaties we defined by the Tribe as activities that may Ldude but me not limited to,pavement removal,pothrohng or augwing,grubbing,tree removals boring,grading,earavahm,drilling,and trenching,within the prgcct area The Tribal Momfor cad/corrrp/ete, daily mon;tu-ding logs that w 0 provide descriptions of the days activities,mcludmg construction whinhq locations. so),and any cultural materials idenOfied. The on-site monitoring sha0 end when al/ground-disturbing activiries on the GBMI-KN-2 Rq'ect Site are completed or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that al/tpeorming grwnd-dstunbrng eccMd s at the iYoject Site have b'ttle to nopotentia/licit impartig Tribal Gdtoa/Resmrces.Upon discovery ofany Tribal Cultural Resource=tansbuction activities shah tease in the immediate vhon ny of the find(no less than the surrounding 100 het)until the find can be assessed All Tribal C ftu a/Raoveccs imcwthed by preyert activities shall be evaluated by the gnehified mcheedogist and Tribal monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe If the resources are Native American in origin,the Consulting Tribe will retain rtllhem it the form and/a manner the Tnbe deems appropnata for eduaatio nd cultural and/o historic pu poses H human remains end/o grave goods me drsmwred or recognized at the Project Nte,al/ground disturbance shall immediately cerise and the county coromer shah/be notd ied per Pub/ic Resources Code Section 5097.98.and Health 6 Sadery Code Section 70505 Horan Cj 6b .rja,+d of i\ioswn lndaro-K-k rO 5., C—a,C\ !>i E)3_l yea? email .\nm��afsek�arvGan..og .+ebsrn s,.r,,bnek�ph,ean.prR 3-14 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments remains and g ave/tsvm1goods shaft be treated ahFe per Cah/omia Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d,Y1J and (2,1 Wl k may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and.it necessary,mitigation takes place ((FQA Guidelines Sect on 15064.5/tf).If.non-Native American resource a determined by the quibried arrheeo/og/st to constitute a -historical resource-or-unique archaeohgial resource,'time allotment and funding sufficient to allow lor implementation of avoidance measures.or apompdste mitigabon,must be available. the treatment plan esMbhihed for the resources shall be in accordance with CCQA Cwidclwes Secvcn t 506a.5(>)for historical resources dnd PRCSeaians 21083.2/6J for unique archaeo/ogia/ resources GUMI-KN-2 cant. Preservation in place re.avoidance)l the preferred manner of treatment 11 preserwlion in place l not feasible. treatment may include implementation cf archaeological data recovery e.avations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis Any historic amhaeologia/material that l net Native Amencdn in origin shelf be curated at a pubhg nnn-profit institution with i research interest in the material,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum,ifsuch an insmut/on agrees to accept the ma:enal 9 no institution accepts dre an:haeofb9,aI matena1.it shell be ofened to a face/schoet or hltonat sooe y in the area for education rt purposes These mitigation measures are the property of the klzh nation and shall not be duplicated,reproduced,or GBMI-KN-3 used for the benefit of any third party without the kizh nation's prior written consent. With /respect. arMrnv Sobs,b>nirmon C,..b„ele...[3.,n6 nn,., .-Ki_K N..;i,.,, PO I'Y>, 59 5 Co. CA ,e>e.tiyp]; em.�l: .Ad-,ie:ar-.+F�rle.oindien.oa ...b.ce: ..v�.e.bdrirnr.�ndi..�.,o•e GISLER RESIDENTIAL.PROJECT 3-15 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT 1S/MND Responses to Comments Letter 2: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation Comment Letter Dated August 3, 2021 GBMI-KN-1 This comment letter pertains to MM TCR-1 recommended by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation. The continent regarding the recommended mitigation measure being the property of the Kizh Nation and as such cannot be duplicated is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. No further response is warranted. As indicated in the Tribal Cultural Resources section of the IS/MND, the City of Huntington Beach initiated consultation on March 29, 2021 by notifying the City's consultation list for the Gisler Residential Project, as required by AB S2 and SB 18. After a good faith effort on the part of the City, consultation between California Native American tribes and the City was concluded for the Project, as the City did not receive any response from the Native American Tribes. Had the City received the mitigation measure identified in the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation's comment letter, it would have been included in the Tribal CUILL11-21 Resources section of the IS/MND. GBMI-KN-2 MM TCR-1 included in Section 8.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, of the IS/MND is hereby replaced with MM TCR-1 identified in the comment letter. It Should be noted that the replacement of MM TCR-1 requested by the commenter does not reflect a substantial change to the Project, nor would the revision result in a new impact or intensification of an impact already identified in the Draft IS/MND. It should be noted that the reference to Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation approving the Native American Monitor because they consulted on this Project (paragraph 1 of MM TCR-1), has been deleted. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation did not respond to the City's AB 52 and SB 18 consultation letters, dated March 29, 2021, as discussed in the Tribal Cultural Resources section, of the IS/MND. 114_44 Tro_'1 Ili the , „t N,-a t.- hRl .1'-r..,..,,.-,,,I .,t g «sus Ili-it ..II aytil-aet - with the exception of h nian „.,' -,.,,1 related bgoods - b the pi,epei-tyowtiei-. All i-eseui-ues Eiiseeye -ed shall he .,.,,I atla! ';,ed 1... tile Pl-GfEa SSiG ,.,I FChae(3I0gi -t - „4th„ And l...;rh'., ., 90 feet --.,1; -1 .d,..11 t.,.. „I rh„ D.-,,;,,.-t .1 .-h- ,l, ;st ,;hall notik, tileh propeFtyewiie­ d-9 T6c1 nlif: I b l n1nHC I. afAii I with the n uu �c6 rj=c .e v o c. ii5 ,ci u'o' ircccr'.:-rm--rrrc-<rrc�'-"i'r.�-r Elesig .,ated Native n.., .-', ., f. ...., „h,1e;-. - -,,,., Rile .,4 th„ t,-ibes 0 ideiitiG;,.,l by the N n HC= as being al4Aliated . 'N ., , the , .l,-,II 0 he -„t..'.,, d to help .,I e the Native wlei o 3-16 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments itenis, Jt .I fAli .t'oe I T„1-,.-eH#•• ,r err, rlcrrcrccrr,c^ill.,d -p4ssib!c-�-anifi iilF�•',�e of Native ,....,.." 'r`e-.seuii-maces—Sr'icr" e—e,.-.6 -,r,,,l ill ith rh,, of the Quality A,-t M Rl,AI l „1 . hnll , ', n,- the i-eligie 13elief�, -c-stcms, v,,c n.-.,grit.. ,h-Ln a AAli ,ted ti-ibes 411 A-en; - P„ n.1 :., r'.,.. ..,111 I•}`THEI�1 0: .pineari,p , ,eIa< ial aareet}neaF aiFn Fhe�issisFtg—Nati,e Thi- c ,lam measules ,I „- to , -ntea rhn .nh , ial ;. r,-„#H--BN -f2 tm— , t.. ❑el ,t'. , /Fel, Fial shall iio� acew ,t'l „II -.tal. ;ig ,1 basic ,L,t'r hii,le rplep:wn,l .,t the U,-aject rite shall he •,pare,i 'n R n,.,nnei-ffw ()Faiige County rh;t n „ets P.,,In,-mil of;41id,,.,{,. ,, ,. 36 (•I:D RaFt "10 and makes PIP eeseii;'ees a to i I.,hT,�.n;c FH w h 'b -e H.S ,,,.,h1e -,,.,..,ant ok ,,,,, a„long with die FeesneEessai-y4w AIM TCR-1 Prior to the commencement of anyground disturbing activity at tile project site, the Project Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor prior to the issuance of any permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The Tribal Monitor will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring,grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the dav's activities, including construction activities, locations, s011, and cmv cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the project site are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at the project site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Upon discovery of cmv Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-17 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS jMND Responses to Comments less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find con be assessed All Tribal Cultural Resources unearthed by Project activities shall be evaluated try the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor approved by the Consulting Tribe. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If bunion remains and/orgravegoods are discovered or- recognized at the project site, all ground disturbance shall immediately cease, and the county coronershall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health K Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grove/burial goods shall he treated alike per California Public Resources Lode section 5097.98(d)(1) crud (2), Work may continue on other parrs of the project site while evoluation and if necessurv, mitigation takes place (CF.QA Guidelines Section 15064.5111). If a non-Native American resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource"or "unique archaeological resource," time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implernentotion of'ovoidance nneasures, or appropriate mitigation, must he available. The treatment plan established for the resources Shull be in accordance with CFQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(0 for historical resources and Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred nnanner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment ma-v include implementation of archaeological dato recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American hr origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution nvith a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural ilistory Museum of-Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. GBMI-KN-3 This language is a repetition of the first paragraph under GBMI-KN-1. Same response applies. 3-18 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT ISfMND Responses to Comments 3.3 INDIVIDUALS A total of four comment letters/emails were received from the individuals and members of the community. The comment letters/emails are listed below: • Nancy Goodfellow (NG)—July 27, 2021 • Terry McClaly (TMC)—August 3, 2021 • Jeannie Bailey (JB)—August 5, 2021 • Kathy Hamilton (Kii)—August 8, 2021 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-19 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Ramos, Ricky Letter 3 From: Mark Goodfellow Sent i uesday,July 27,2021 11:19 AM To: Ramos,Ricky Subject: Negative Declaration No.20 002 for Gisler Residential As:t current resident living on Cocohana Lane less than one hl.ck from the prolwsed site.and with all additional rental pnyttrty boated on Slrnhmt,ore lane directly across the street lions the nonhczstnm-nio a houmLIM of the site 1 would like 11)list some of tun'concern about this project. I xt me preface these concerns bs'staling[hut I do not object to any and all development of the site- 1 object to the,'av it is planned laid[he NG-1 .ire of the project. Please don't label me a"not in nq neighborhood'person. I rcali[c that sve need housing in I luntingtorl Beach.Ihn,e need,ell planted and affordable housing. pint,the builder is seeking a variance in order to reduce the lot sizes dossn from,hat the area is zoned for. This means lots that are 22.i^B smaller[Iran ahal they should he. And the, sill he narro,cr by ten feel from ss'hal the should he.So the developer will[ry[o squeeze as many houses inn the space as ponsihle.llte houses are to he a minimum of 2NOO square fen and up to?,'00,square feet.So there it he grant houses wring on tint NG-2 lots, and once again prqu urns our over hwhilin'. 1,ould like to know sshcther amone involved in the decision to go ahead with this project actually lives in the neighborhood. Second.the onh'access to the S5 homes is a single entrance from Stra[hnttwr Lute. It,told seem to me that access should he from[,n locations to ntiligae traffic problems and for safely reasons.All traffic into and out of the project will be funneled onto Stradunoor. It seems better to provide access from the north or west via one NG-3 of the cul-de-sacs as %ell.01 course that might news one or 1wo fes.er homes. And finally,my most Personal complaint.A heauliful soccer field was built in the large area to the,esl of (iisler hack when my granddaughter was playing AYSO stscer.That was the nicest,biggest field anvwherc its southeastern Huntington Bench.and wan one of the fesv that had lighting for night g:nic. At a vxt of somewhere around S200.0IXI.it has provided a place for hops and girls to play the boaulifid game fix two NG-4 decades.One of nn'granddaughter's coaches.a landscape architect.built it for the wung athleleS of Ilwvington Reach.'The)'still plrv% soccer Thera Where will they play what houses replace their held?Will a nest field Ix built Ilr them:is compensation'' Sincerclv. Nlmcv 0oodfellasv 3-20 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFP IS/MND Responses to Comments Letter 3: Nancy Goodfellow Comment Letter Dated July 27, 2021 NG-1 The commenter identifies the locations of her home and her rental property in the vicinity of the proposed Project. She also indicates that while she does not object to development on the site of the proposed Project, she has concerns about the size and the way it is planned. The City needs well planned and affordable housing, she points out.The comments are noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. No specific comment is identified, and no additional response is required. NG-2 The comment expresses concern over the small lot sizes that will be permitted with a variance and the large sizes of the houses to he built on them.The comment asserts that profit matters more than livability. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. The comment does not identify a CEQA issue, and as such no further response is warranted. However, it is noted that the "Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance includes a provision that allows the Applicant to propose a planned unit development (PUD) and a tentative tract map (TTM) with reduced lot size and/or width without the need for a variance application. In return, the Applicant is required to present public benefits for review by the City. NG-3 The commenter is concerned over the single access into the Project and asserts that the site should also be accessed from the north or west. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. It is noted in the IS/MND that the Project would be accessed from Strathmoor Lane,and a 24-foot wide emergency access is also proposed from Bluefield Drive to the north of the site. Private properties abutting the project site to the north and west and the park to the south prohibit the possibility of another access point along those locations. Additionally, it is indicated that the entry from Strathmoor Lane complies with and is in accordance with City regulations and requirements. Further, it should be noted, as indicated in Section 8.17, Traffic, of the IS/MND, a site access evaluation was conducted and determined that site access as well as internal circulation for the proposed Project is adequate. Table 8-39, on page B-130 in that section summarizes the intersection operations at the proposed Project driveway located along Strathmoor Lane for the Year 2025 and buildout traffic conditions at completion and full occupancy of the proposed Project. The table shows that the proposed Project driveway is forecast to operate at acceptable L.OS A during the AM and PM peak hours for future traffic conditions. As such, Project access would be adequate. Motorists entering and exiting the Project site would be able to do so without undue congestion. Additional detail is provided in Appendix E of the Traffic Analysis Report, which presents the level of service calculation worksheets for the proposed Project driveway along Strathmoor Lane. Thus, based on the analysis conducted, a single driveway in compliance with City standards would be sufficient for the proposed Project and would not result Jn any impacts. GISLER RESm ENTIAL PROJECT 3-21 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments NG-h The comment expresses concern over the loss of the soccer field upon development of the Project. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. This is not a CE.QA issue and therefore, no additional response is required. 3-22 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Ramos, Ricky Letter 4 From Terry McCrary Sent Tuesday,August 3,2021 12:01 PM To: Rams,Ricky Subject: New housing at 21141 Suvthmoor in Huntington Beach. I was appalled to see how many houses will be packed in to the formally school grounds.Why is the city trying to pack these homes in an already high density part of the city.This new proposed subdivision will impact the use of Gisler park since the new subdivision will have little green space for their activities.I hope this project TMC-1 can be downsized so the area does not turn into a Betio, 1 GISLER RESIDENTIAL. PROJFC'I' 3-23 RI:SPONSES'1'0 COMMENTS ON DRAF'r IS/MND Responses to Comments Letter 4: Terry McClary Comment Letter Dated August 3, 2021 TMC-1 The continent expresses concern over the density of the proposed Project within an already dense part of the City. The comment asserts that the Project would impact Gisler Park due to small amount of green space within the development. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. The Project's density is 6.23 dwelling units per net acre (85 dwelling units over 1.3.64 net acres), which conforms to the proposed Residential Low Density General Plan and zoning designations permitting up to 7 dwelling units per net acre. The IS/MND notes the location of Gisler Park in relation to the Project. However, it should be recognized that the Project proposes improvements to Gisler Park, which is located on Southern California Edison (SCE) property to the south of the Project site. The City has a license agreement with SCE to operate and maintain the park. The proposed improvements include the replacement of the existing concrete pathway that runs throughout the linear park and the replacement of existing tot lot play area. These proposed improvements are considered to be a public benefit to the existing community. The list of the proposed improvements is included in Section 3.4.1, Gisler Park Improvements, of the IS/MND. The proposed improvements would help reduce the maintenance cost of the existing condition of the Gisler Park. The proposed improvements are anticipated to not expand beyond the City's current license agreement with SCE or result in issues pertaining to clearance with the above-ground high-volage transmission lines that run through the length of the park. Thus, in light of the proposed improvements and in compliance with City standards, the park would be an enhanced amenity for the existing and future residents of the area. Furthermore,the Project will pay park in lieu fees to comply with Quimby Act requirements, as noted in Chapter 254 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 3-24 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Letter S Ramos, Ricky From: Jeanie Bailey Sent Thursday,August 5,2021 11:32 AM To: Rams,Ricky Subject: Gisler Residential Project I have been living on Strathmoor Lane for 50 years and along with my neighbors have concerns regarding said project- Traffic from construction trucks. Dirt from trucks driving dawn Strathmoor. III 1 Dirt from project itself.We will have to keep our homes closed up to avoid excessive dirt build up. Then once project is complete traffic from additional residents in our neighborhood.Let's say conservatively speaking there are 2 cars per home that is 170 more can driving thru our neighborhood.It may force us to adjust our schedules 113_2 so we can get out of our driveways. We worry there will be low incorne housing included in this project and threat of sober living homes allowed. Hopefully the city will contact us to let us know when the public hearing is scheduled. JB-3 Ieannie Bailey Strathmoor Lane Resident Sent from my iPhone t GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-25 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Letter S:Jeannie Bailey Comment Letter Dated August 5, 2021 JB-1 The comment expresses concerns over traffic and dirt from construction activities. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. An analysis of construction traffic was conducted and included in Section 8.17, Transportation, of the IS/MND. Per the analysis, construction traffic is not expected to create any significant impact due to the size of the Project and duration of construction. Construction related trips associated with trucks and employees traveling to and from the site in the morning and afternoon may result in some minor, temporary/short-term impact to vehicles using Brookhurst Streets, Atlanta Avenue, and Hamilton Avenue in the morning and afternoon hours; however, traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network would be minimal and not long-term. Nevertheless, to minimize the potential disruptions on the local circulation system and to facilitate the movement of construction traffic, the City of Huntington Beach routinely requires the implementation of a construction management plan, which is provided as regulatory requirement RR TRAN-1. With compliance with City requirements, the Project would not conflict with applicable plans, ordinance, or policy, and Project's construction impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regarding dirt from trucks and the Project itself, as analyzed in Section 8.3, Air Quality, of the IS/MND, all construction activities would be conducted in compliance With South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD's) Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, for controlling fugitive dust control measures and avoiding nuisance. This regulation is included in Section 4.3 as regulatory requirement RR AQ-1. In light of compliance with Rule 403 measures,110 impacts pertaining to dirt or dust from trucks and construction would occur. JB-2 The continent asserts that additional trips from the proposed Project would impact traffic in the neighborhood and that they would need to adjust their schedule in order to be able to leave their driveways. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. Section 8.17,Transportation, of this IS/MND provides a detailed analysis of Project construction and operation activities. The analysis conducted was for the full trip generation potential of the Project, as the school is currently vacant. This is a conservative approach. "file analysis determined that the Project would result in less than significant impact for all scenarios with the exception of'Buildout Plus Project Traffic Conditions". However, with the proposed improvements, the impacts would be reduced to less than significant level. The implementation of recommended improvements (mitigation measure [MMJ TRAN-1) at the intersection of Brookhurst Street/Hamilton Avenue completely offsets the resulting Project impact, and the intersection is forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours. 3-26 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSESTo COMMENTS ON DRAF•-r IS/MND Responses to Comments 113-3 The commenter opines that the Project would include low income housing, and it would allow "sober living" homes on the site. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. However, the comment is not a CEQA issue and is speculative, therefore, no further response is required. A detailed discussion of the proposed Project is provided in Section 3.0, Project Description, of the IS/MND. The comment regarding notification for public hearing will be forwarded to the City. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-27 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Letter 6 8 August 2021 To: Ricky Ramos,Senior Planner,City of Huntington Beach,Community Development Department PO Box 190, Huntington Beach,CA. 92648 2000 Main Street ITB,CA. 926-18 RRamos@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 for Gisler Residential Reference: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No.20-002,Public Notice dated July 2021 and development property at 21141 Strathmoor Lane, HB,CA.92646 As a resident of Huntington Beach,in the neighborhood adjacent to the above noted Gisler residential development,I have concerns regarding the proposed mitigation plan and potential KII-I development impact. Comments were requested via the above reference"Public Notice." My comments/concerns /questions are noted herein. 1. Potential impact to the value of existing housing. What definitive data does the city or developer have that conclusively supports the information provided by the developer KII-2 du,ing Zoom calls(hosted by the developer with existing residents)the value of existing housing will not be negatively impacted by the NEW residential housing? 2. Regarding the City's updated'"Affordable Housing Ordinance: When will the city and developer know conclusively if the developer can meet the requirement with a pay in- KII-3 lieu fee or developer would have to establish a Specific Plan or comply? 3. Has the city or developer considered Panacea as an additional entrance and exit into the new development? Funneling all traffic in one direction(Strathmoor and/or Effingham) KII-4 does not appear to be safe nor efficient. 4. How will the city and developer monitor construction traffic,equipment vibration and overall activity to ensure the,a is no damage to existing streets,fences, home foundations,etc.? KII-5 a. If there is an impact,how will the city and developer address the damage so the existing home owners are not left with the costs to repair/replace? S. Why 85 units? Can the city and developer meet their"economic/profit"goals with a reduced number of units? a. Significantly reducing the number of housing units and creating more"green" KII 6 space would he beneficial to the community. 6. The report indicates in several key areas(Environmental Analysis—such as;air quality, toxic/hazardous materials,water,waste,flooding)that impact is considered"Less than KII-7 Significant"and no mitigation plan is necessary. 3-28 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments a. How will the city and developer track construction activity to ensure the potential impacts stay on plan and within regulatory standards? KH-7 cant b. What if issues arise after construction has concluded? I appreciate your time and look forward to public responses to the above noted concerns, comments,questions. Kathy Hamilton 21081 Cocobana lane HB,CA. 92616 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-29 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments Letter 6: Kathy Hamilton Comment Letter Dated August 8, 2021 KH-1 The commenter identifies that she resides in the neighborhood -adjacent to the proposed Project and expresses concern over the proposed mitigation plan and potential impacts of the Project. The comment is noted, and no further response is required. Kli-2 The comment regarding the Project impacting the existing property values is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. The issue of property values is not a CEQA issue, and as such no further response is required. KH-3 The comment questions the tuning of when the developer or the City would know whether the developer is required to establish a specific plan or pay in-lieu fee in compliance with the City's updated "Affordable Housing Ordinance". The continent is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. It should be recognized that the draft Affordable Housing Ordinance that could potentially allow the Applicant to pay affordable housing in-lieu fees for Gisler Residential is currently in progress, and the City Council could make a decision in the near future. KH-4 The comment and concern regarding an additional entrance and exist into the Project is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. It is noted in the IS/MND that the Project would be accessed from Strathmoor Lane, and a 24-foot wide emergency access is also proposed from Bluefield Drive to the north of the site. Private properties abutting the project site to the north and west and the park to the south prohibit the possibility of another access point along those locations. It is also indicated that die entry from Strathmoor Lane complies with and is in accordance with City regulations and requirements. Additionally,as indicated in Section 8.17,Traffic,of the IS/MND,a site access evaluation was conducted, which determined that site access as well as internal circulation for the proposed Project is adequate. Table 8-39 on page 8-130 in that section smnmarizes the intersection operations at the proposed Project driveway located along Strathmoor Lane for Year 2025 and buildout traffic conditions at completion and full occupancy of the proposed Project. The table shows that the proposed Project driveway is forecast to operate at acceptable LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours for future traffic conditions. As such, Project access would be adequate. Motorists entering and exiting the Project site would be able to do so without undue congestion. Additional detail is provided in Appendix E of the Traffic Analysis Report, which presents the level of service calculation worksheets for the proposed Project driveway located along Strathmoor Lane. Thus, based on the analysis conducted, a single driveway in compliance with City standards would be sufficient for the proposed Project and Would not result in any impacts. KH-5 The comment expresses concern over construction traffic; equipment vibration; and the potential damage to existing streets, fences, and foundations. The comment further 3-30 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT' IS/MND Responses to Continents questions how the homeowners would be compensated in case of damage to their properties. The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. Sections 8.10, Noise and 8.17, Transportation, of the IS/MND provide detailed discussion and analyses regarding Project construction and the potential impacts resulting from construction activities. As discussed in Section 8.10, Noise, of the IS/MND, conventional construction equipment would be used for demolition and grading activities, with no pile driving or blasting equipment. Per the analysis conducted, vibration levels would be under the vibration annoyance criteria. However, vibration levels would exceed the criteria thresholds for cosmetic building damage for existing residential uses located to the north and west of the Project site when construction activities occur under maximum (i.e., closest to the receptor) exposure conditions with certain heavy equipment. Construction-related vibration would be substantially less under average conditions when construction activities are located further away. As vibration levels could be above the significance thresholds, a mitigation measures (MM N01-1) was proposed to reduce the impacts to less than significant. MM N01-1 would avoid potential vibration induced cosmetic building damage to offsite buildings by requiring that construction activities using vibratory rollers, and large bulldozers restrict the operation of equipment by at least 25 feet from off-site buildings.This would require that vibratory rollers and large bulldozer or their equivalents operate at least 15 feet from the Project site boundaries. Thus, with implementation of MM NC]-1, no damage to existing structures would occur. In the absence of any damage, the issue of cost to repair the damage to existing homes is not relevant and does not require a response. In terms of construction traffic, Section 8.17, Transportation, of the IS/MND includes an analysis with the finding of less than significant impact. The discussion indicated that due to the size of the Project and duration of construction, construction traffic is not expected to create any significant impact. Construction related trips associated with trucks and employees traveling to and from the site in the morning and afternoon may result in some minor traffic delays; however, traffic impacts to the adjacent roadway network would be minimal and not long-term. Nevertheless, to minimize the potential disruptions on the local circulation system and to facilitate the movement of construction traffic,the City of Huntington Beach routinely requires the implementation of a Construction management plan, which is provided as regulatory requirement RR TRAN-1. With compliance with City requirements, the Project's construction impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. KFI-6 The comment questions the number of traits and suggests reducing the number of units and creating more green space. The comment also questions if the City and developer can meet their economic and profit goals with a reduced number of units. Comments are noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. The comments are not related to CF..QA; therefore, no further response is required. GISLFR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3-31 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Responses to Comments KI1-7 The comment reiterates the findings of some of the environmental topics and asks how construction activities will be tracked to ensure the impacts "stay on plan and within regulatory standards". The comment is noted and will be forwarded to the decision makers. It should be noted, the proposed development is no different from other- development projects.The City of Huntington Beach will issue permits (e.g., demolition, grading,building,occupancy,etc.) with binding requirements that the development will comply with. The comment regarding issues post Construction is not clear. No response can be provided. 3-32 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND 4.0 REVISIONS AS PART OF THE FINAL IS/MND Revisions have been made to the Draft IS/MND based on input received during the public review period and while preparing the responses to comments on the Draft IS/MND. Additionally, the City of Huntington Beach initiated some revisions, as identified below. The revisions requested by the commenters and proposed by the City do not reflect a substantial change to the Project description, nor would any of the changes result in a new impact or intensification of an impact already identified in the Draft IS/MND. The changes are not in response to comments that raise significant environmental issues. Additions to the Draft IS/MND are shown in red italicized text and deletions are shown in Feci-st+iket4++eugh text. 4.1 REVISIONS TO THE TEXT OF THE IS/MND 4.1.1 SECTION 1.3.4 EXISTING SETTING A revision to the existing condition of the Project site is proposed by the City to identify that the existing lighted field on the western half of the site is currently being use by the American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) for soccer practices/games. The revision does not reflect a substantial change to the Project, nor would the revision result in a new impact or intensification of an impact already identified in the Draft IS/MND. The revisions to Section 1.3.4, Existing Setting, on page 1-2, of the Gisler Residential Project IS/MND are hereby made to read as follows (red italics shows the additional text and •-• d sti-ikethi-augh show the deletions): Project Site The Project site is currently developed with a school campus, includir>,g sports fields—' se.. ,r slated for demolition. The existing use is comprised of an approximately 73,000 sf building and associated surfacing parking lot on the eastern half of the site and sports fields on the western half of the site. The building is not in use, but the sports fields are currently being used by the American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO)for soccer practices and James. The school campus formerly served as both a public school (i.e., Ernest H. Gisler Middle School) and a private school (i.e., Greater Long Beach Schools, Inc. [operating as Brethren Christian Junior and Senior High School). Additionally, the above revisions are also made to Section 2.2.2, Existing Development Conditions, on page 2-1, of the Gisler Residential Project IS/MND to read as follows (red italics shows the additional text and ;-ed simi-ikethrough show the deletions): 2.2.2 Existing Development Conditions The Project site is currently developed with a school campus, including sports fields v -hie • is 1;f3i, wi iise-a+W slated for demolition.The existing use is comprised of an approximately 73,000 sf building and associated surfacing parking lot on the eastern half of the site and sports fields on the western half of the site. The building is not in use, but the spurts fields ore currently being used by the American Youth GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 4-1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Revisions as Part of the Final IS/MND Soccer Organization (:AYSO) ]or- soccer practices and games. The school campus formerly served as both a Public school (i.e., Ernest H. Gisler Middle School) and a private school (i.e., Greater Long Beach Schools, Inc. (operating as Brethren Christian Junior and Senior High School). 4.1.2 SECTION 3.0, PROJECT DESCRIPTION A revision pertaining to the Conditional Use Permit as one of the entitlements for the proposed Project has been initiated by the City of Huntington Beach to reflect the update to the requirement. The revision does not reflect a Substantial change to the Project, nor would the revision result in a new impact or intensification of an impact already identified in the Draft IS/MND. The revisions to Section 3.6.4, Conditional Use Permit No. 20-024, on page 3-7, of the Gisler Residential Project IS/MND are hereby made to read as follows (red italic's shows the additional text and -ebl show the deletions): A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) would be required to permit(leg=eiap the-site-as-a size4 H-Wei- 6,000 so and lot }c4t {A+kde HA fF+ei+}i+}�f } a4t4 4)+-- retaining walls over two feet tall, topped with o six-foot tall walllpnc'e. Additionally, the above revisions are also made to Section 4.0, Project Information, Concurrent Entitlements, on page 4-1, of the Gisler Residential Project IS/MND to read as follows (red italics shows the additional text and red show the deletions): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 20-024 -To permit clevelep t4e-4te-a° a W an!1ed Wiij� Develorpment (PUD) with reduced lot size (under- 6,000 sH and lot vidth (,,,., ei- 69 4 Eiininium) ai:rd c.,- retaining walls over two feet tall, topped with a six-foot tall wall/fence. 4.1.3 SECTION 8.18, TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES MM TCR-1 included in Section B.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, of the lS/MND is hereby replaced with MM TCR-1 identified in the comment letter. It should be noted that the replacement of MM TCR-1 requested by the commenter does not reflect a substantial change to the Project, not, would the revision result in a new impact or intensification of an impact already identified in the Draft IS/MND. IWA7 TGR-1 In tl.,, ,.t that rpihal -ultiii4esau;cesdjq Pd at the 14-, feet .rite. the. h-.,,,{I' ,,. of the .{' .,.,. .o..,,,{ i-e-,.,.,.ces shall as . � b c , .{,... ihef{ I.elw. . I.L....,.yer, 4 L- .ides..-tool th-.t-.II a -t'faEto with tile b goods ,ae,ed/ee,-e,,,onial objects, belong to the pieye;-ty ovine,-. All ..hall h,. :....,...r,. - ,.,{ „{ analyzed L. ,he Ai-chaeelegist of NRVivp di ,{ all cia tile immediate vicinity of the And (within a �g 1�)R� i-adius) shall stop, and the lira',(, t A,.,.hae ,.lo,,' -t shall ,l Euti the. pi-opei-ty swi:i, . ..,,,{ • t,-ibes idetit-iAed by the NAWC as h„',.,.n afAliated with tke a;-ea. A 4-2 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Revisions as Part of the Final IS/MNU k4entiAed by the NAHC, as h n 'a a4iliared 'rh tl, ea—shali— e I-etamed—{fl--lE'Ip analyze the—Native American eves-yda.. life ., ,,1 /n.. .elig'}ous 9F sacred Items, P RSS+hle. The Si`aullifi(-allPenF Nar' AllleFiCillle, he ,h ,re,l in accoidanee with the Ejw; 4 the ral'P, Quality c .l Art arnA) a , ;haa ,l ie.- the Feligin a hehePs, eusioms7an.l , .arr'rno of ,FF'I'arn,l rr'hnr All 'n. 4) „l assodatioi :th Nar'. a a 'a llc"+++ElllH� NativeAmei-icaFithat '@Feele ated /rel, ,1 4 tile Drnieet site would uld he r. Ears to a F. Il. exeEn rn,i .n L,.•aNn , /..n h. ..'nl a ith a sl+all .- dmeasm-esOle eb al iiela F.n.,, n,,.. F l : ,,.,arts PnlaEarian trap .•'nl shall ,nt err r nt'l all atal,g; ,' ,1 1, -,la have heen completed. Native AmeFiEaiichar ,t h RVRidPd OFnln ,l at O we Dru 'e�t site shall 13,, pi-e ,a -e,l F„ - r ...,t ..., ar -,., aEcFedited ,t' fn 'I4 than rr e F.,.1p ,I sr. .,,la.-.l - peF 36 rCP Part -0 .,„,l „apes r6.. rnr.,. ,-,.nr a..n'In I,In to .,their .,.-,-I,nnnine'rrr/,rase-,r,.h err /tr:l„r Fnr F. i-hnr st .,h. The a Af-cha Lglogis- shall deli..nr the N-,r n.,,nr'rn., .n-n riser '.., I ..1;.,.. O a r'rin to rl, ,l' ,l -Ri 011Fa ;I'r 411 able aillouR ,F t'llie, al, 'th Hl F„P-S RPCP- Fn at' AM TCR-1 Prior to the commencement of env ground disturbing activity at the project site, the Project Applicant shall retain a Native American A1onitor prior to the issuance of cnry permit necessary to commence a ground-disturbing activity. The Tribal Monitor will only he present on- site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities ore defined by the Tribe as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, haring, grading, excavation, chilling, and trenching, within the project area. 7'he Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring lags that will provide descriptions of the do activities, including construction activities, locations,soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on- site monitoring shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the i,rroject site are completed, at- when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at the project site have little to no potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Upon discovery of arty Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find (not less than the surrounding 100 feet) until the find can be assessecl. All Tribal Cultural Resources unearthed by Project activities shall be evaluated w the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor approved try the Consulting Tribe. lithe resources are Native GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 4-3 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS jMND Revisions as Part of the Final IS MND American in origin, the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the foam and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate,for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes. If human remains und/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the project site, all ground disturbunce shall immediately cease, and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and Health K Sojety Code .Section 70.50.5. Hunan remains and grave/burial goods shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(cd)(1) and (2). Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.51]1). If o non-Native American resource is determined by the qualijied archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" or "unique archaeological resource," time allotment and fundinl sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance meosu-es, orappropriate mitigation, must be available. 77ne treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5O for historical resources and Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if:such an institution agrees to accept the material. If oo institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4-4 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT-IS jMND Revisions as Part of the Final IS/MND 4.2 REVISIONS TO THE EXHIBITS The only revision that resulted from the comments on the Draft IS/MND is to Exhibit 3-8, Gisler Park Improvements in Section 3.0, Project Description, of the IS/MND. This exhibit is revised to include item number (8) call out and is included on the following page. The revision requested does not reflect a substantial change to the Project, nor would the revision result in a new impact or intensification of an impact already identified in the Draft IS/MND. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 4-5 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND Revisions as Part of the Final!S/MND 9 P _ LEGEND k q .w,wf.nnl w.w all ,`j$y"�r' • Yp M Iry10n„1 DMY � • ��t�•.>•ID* �• _.1 i .nO,.D,u.w.ln lq'wW n.lury q�ry � � � maim wYY 1.�,_ iq _LR ��.. � - �" Y. _. .. � «_. _ _ .. - . . _�� � •..pwepry equpmnlWuu biwbn '+ n Wry'l••••Sr S"l d . '/ 0aei.aallw,n tmnetibnf l,a,pwY lD N ,M+J14wAnA ' O 1, � — �r •Mq.O.lwif IO p.tY 1W cl yQ.wYl n Tf . , - i WWI O O 4 v • •NIIIryntYn n..,,.a �4wbw w.�wk wiles carol Wn 011M wro 41 l n+t �- O Gisler Park Improvements Exhibit 3-8 cwr a.,Yoilvlwar.. •�• wr w+..wr GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 4-1 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT IS/MND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION _ Gisler Residential Project ' - Jan Y a w is Lwf.y 1 - ik,ra P " September 2021 . . .. 201 Mitigation Monitorin y and Reporting Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Pape Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................1. 1.2 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures.............................................................................1 1.3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program....................................................1 1.4 Project Location and Site Access.................................................................................2 1.5 Project Description..............._..........................................................................................2 1.5.1 Residential land Use.............................................................................................. 2 1.5.2 Enery Efficiency........................................................................................................ 2 1.5.3 Project Access/Parking.........................................................................................3 1.5.4 Conceptual Landscape Plan................................................................................3 1.5.5 Gisler Park Improvements................................................................................... 4 1.5.6 Construction Activities.......................................................................................... 5 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT i INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 1.1 INTRODUCTION In accordance with the requirements of Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, and as part of its certification of the adequacy of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Gisler Residential Project, the City Council (Council) of the City of Huntington Beach (City) adopts the following Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP or Program). The Council adopts this MMRP in its capacity as the lead agency for IS/MND in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.). The principal purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the Council-approved mitigation measures and regulatory requirements for the adopted Project are reported and monitored to ensure compliance with the measures' requirements. In general, City of Huntington Beach, Community Development Department is responsible for overseeing implementation and completion of the adopted measures. This includes the review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition, unless otherwise noted in the attached MMRP 'fable However, the Council retains overall responsibility for verifying implementation of all adopted mitigation measures. 1.2 MITIGATION MONITORING PROCEDURES The City is the designated lead agency for the MMRP.The Community Development Department is responsible for reviewing all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition, Unless otherwise noted in the MMRP Table. 1.3 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The MMRP is provided in tabular format to facilitate effective tracking and documentation of the status of regulatory requirements and mitigation measures.The attached MMRP Table provides the following monitoring information: • Regulatory Requirements. 'Pile text of all adopted Regulatory Requirements for the Project from the IS/MND. • Mitigation Measures. The text of all adopted mitigation measures for the Project from IS/MND. • Responsible for Implementation. The Project Applicant or designated representative is the responsible party for implementing the measure, and the City of Huntington Beach or a designated representative is responsible for monitoring implementation of the measure, unless noted differently. • Timing of Mitigation. A time frame is provided for performance of the regulatory requirements and mitigation measure, and the points selected are designed to ensure that impact-related components do not proceed without establishing that the mitigation is implemented. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 1 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Responsibility for Monitoring. The City Department(s) or other public agency(ies) responsible for overseeing the implementation and completion of each measure. • Completion Date. The date the measure is completed. This column of the Mh1RP Table is to be filled in by the approving/verifying authority at a later date. Upon completion, the MMRP and associated documentation will be kept on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, Planning Division. 1.4 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE ACCESS The approximate 1.3.64-acre Project site is in the southeastern portion of the City of Huntington Beach, in Orange County,California.The site is located at 21 141 Strathmoor Lane and is generally surrounded by single-family residential to the north, east and west, and Gisler Park to the south. A City parking lot is also located to the east.The site is approximately 3.6 miles south of Interstate 405 (1-405); 1.4 miles north of State Route 1 (SR-1); and 2.S miles west of SR-SS. 1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.5.1 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE The proposed Gisler Residential Project involves construction of an 85-unit single-family detached residential development on an approximately 13.64-acre site with a density of 6.23 dwelling units per gross acre (du/ac). The existing vacant building and associated site improvements would he demolished to accommodate the proposed Project. As a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the homes are proposed on approximately minimum 4,661 sf lots,with a minimum lot width of 50 feet (ft). The proposed development would include three plan types, with three elevation styles for each plan. The plans range from approximately 2,800 sf to 3,300 sf in size, with up to five bedrooms and three bathrooms,and two- or three-car garages. Rear yards range from mininnum depths of 22± ft internally to more than 40 ft along the western and southern property lines. The proposed residences would all be solar-equipped and energy efficient and in compliance with the strict Building Efficiency Standards - Title 24 mandated in the 2019 code update. The proposed development would be accessed only from Strathmoor Lane, and a 24-foot wide emergency access is also proposed from Bluefield Drive to the north of the site.The layout of the internal streets is similar to the adjacent residential developments. A hierarchy of landscaping, including trees, shrubs,and turf would be provided to soften edge conditions that would include thematic masonry yard walls. Improvements are proposed to the existing active open space immediately to the south at the Gisler Park. 1.5.2 ENERY EFFICIENCY As indicated above, the proposed residential units would be in compliance with the strict Building Efficiency Standards - Title 24 mandated in the 2019 code update. According to the California Energy Commission (CEC), single-family units built in compliance with the 2019 standards use about 7 percent less energy due to energy efficiency measures versus those built under the 2016 standards. Additionally, with solar electricity generation factored in, residential 2 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Progrom units built under the 2019 standards would use about S3 percent less energy than those under the 2016 standards. The proposed residential development would include the following components: • Solar Photovoltaic Systems. The systems would be sized based on estimated demand to power the units' electrical loads, including plug-in appliances. • Building Envelope. Strengthened insulation would be used in attics, walls, and window to improve conhfortand energy savings and avoid dependence on mechanical systems for temperature regulation. • Healthy Indoor Air Quality. Highly efficient filters that trap hazardous particulates from outdoor air as well as high efficiency ventilation systems would be utilized. • Ultra-Low NOx Furnaces. Furnaces installed would be South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)-certified and meet the required emissions level of 14ng/1 NOx for single-family units. Per the SCAQMD, Ultra-Low NOx furnaces reduce smog-forming NOx emissions from residential space heating. 1.5.3 PROJECT ACCESS/PARKING The Gisler Residential Project would be accessed only from Strathmoor Lane,and a 24-foot wide emergency access is also provided from Bluefield Drive to the north of the site. The mid-block entry from Strathmoor Lane is in accordance with City requirements.A total of seven units would front on Strathmoor Lane,and the remaining 78 units would be accessed through private streets, which would connect to Strathmoor Lane at the main access point. The layout of the proposed internal streets is similar to the adjacent single-family residential units and the sheets meet City Standard, with widths of 40 ft curb to curb, for a total 52 ft wide public right-of-way. The private streets within the development would include sidewalks. The proposed street widths, as discussed above, accommodate double-loaded on-street parking throughout the entire neighborhood, with the exception of the short section at the entry. The proposed Project would comply with the City's parking requirements. 1.5.4 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN The proposed conceptual landscape plan would include a hierarchy of plant materials including trees, vines, shrubs, and turf throughout the Project site, and in open space areas. A layered landscape concept along the northern portion of the Project site would provide a buffer between the Project site and the existing adjacent residential development and the public right-of-way (ROW). The landscape in this area would be maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). Landscape screening is also proposed for the City's Gisler Park parking lot and along the entire southern edge shared with Gisler Park. Common area HOA lots are located along the Project's Bluefield Drive frontage; the northern edge of"B" Street; the ends and corners of each internal residential blocks; both sides of Street "A" at the entry; at the mid-block traffic chokers; and the open space Lot "A". Additionally, the Project entry would be highlighted with substantial landscaping and entry monumentation. A variety of trees of different sizes and colors are proposed throughout the development, GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 3 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program including: Star Pine (Aroucoria spp.), Palo Verde (Cercidium x 'Desert Museurn�, Mediterranean Fan Palm (Chumaerops humilis), Carrotwood Tree (Cupaniopsis anacordioides), Dragon 'free (Dracaena drago), and more. The Applicant would install 36-inch box trees in each front yard and leave the balance of the front and rear yards for future homeowners' personalized landscaping. Project landscaping would comply with all landscape irrigation efficiency code requirements in effect at the time of development. There is also a 0.23-acre passive open space area provided in the southeast corner of the site above the underground water quality detention basin. This area would be planted with turf and vertical trees at its perimeters. A concrete walk would surround the open turf on four sides and connect to the sidewalk. Additionally, benches and canopy trees would be provided along the eastern edge of the open turf. 1.5.5 GISLER PARK IMPROVEMENTS Gisler Park, a public park, is located immediately adjacent and to the south of the Project site. The Project proposes improvements to the existing park,which is located on Southern California Edison (SCE) property. The City has a license agreement with SCE to operate and maintain the park.The proposed improvements include the replacement of the existing concrete pathway that runs throughout the linear park and the replacement of existing tot lot play area.These proposed improvements are considered to be a public benefit to the existing community in return and as a requirement for the approval of a Planned Units Development (PUD) to allow the proposed reduced lot size and width. The proposed improvements would: • Replace the existing walkway system with a 10-foot wide natural gray concrete walk.The wider walkway would better accommodate bi-directional pedestrian traffic Flow. As part of the walkway replacement, the walkway's alignment will be adjusted to improve pedestrian circulation and service vehicle access to the park. • At the walkway entrances at Bushard Street and Panacea Drive, replace and relocate damaged bollards to behind the sidewalk. Other hardscape improvements include the removal and replacement of the existing pedestrian ramps at both entrances to bring them in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • Improve connectivity to the tot lots and main walkway from existing homes to the south by installing additional walkways. • Replace three existing tot lot sand areas with a single, large tot lot play area and rubberized play surface. Tot Lot improvements would feature new play equipment for various age ranges and include new site furniture at the playground area. • Replace the tree at Gisler Park public parking lot that was recently removed by the City clue to wind damage at the park entrance. • Remove and replace the existing walkway to the Project site with turf. • Add new trash cans throughout the park to replace existing cans. The proposed improvements would help reduce the maintenance cost of the existing condition of the Gisler Park. The above improvements are anticipated to not expand beyond the City's 4 GISLER RESIDENTIAL. PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program current license agreement with SCE or result in issues pertaining to clearance with the above ground high-volage transmission lines that run through the length of the park. 1.5.6 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Construction activities are anticipated to begin in early 2022 and occur in a single phase,through April 2025, for a total of 40 months. Construction activities would start with demolition and land development, including grading and infrastructure. The housing construction stage is a continuous process,comprised of smaller sub-phases that include construction ofsmall numbers Of units, which would start every two to four months, based on sales absorption. Construction activity would generally occur between 7:30am to 5:00pm, Monday to Friday, and if required on Saturdays, in accordance with the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. DEMOLITION Implementation of the Project would include demolition of the existing building and onsite crushing of concrete and pavement, which would result in export of materials from the Project site. Demolition activities would commence in start after issuance of required permits and have a duration of less than four months. The street widths shall comply with the Fire lane requirements stated in the HBFD's City Specification #401. Street widths with parallel parking on either side of the street shall be a minimum 40 ft,and parallel parking on one side of the street shall be at least 32 ft. A portion of the construction and demolition (C&D) debris (65 percent) would be recycled, reused, and/or salvaged in compliance with the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code), as adopted by the Huntington Beach Code. Materials that cannot be recycled, reused, or salvaged would be transported to one of the Orange County Waste & Recycling local landfill (i.e., Frank R. Bowerman, Prima Deshecha, or Olinda Alpha). Any hazardous materials (e.g.,asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint) encountered during demolition would be handled and disposed of in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) rules and other pertinent regulations. GRADING/CONSTRUCTION The proposed grading of the site would retain the relatively flat topography. Grading activities are anticipated to occur over a period of 4 months starting in starting in early 2022 . Grading activities would include an estimated 12,000 cubic yards of cut and 62,000 cubic yards of fill and require approximately 50,000 cubic yards of import continuous process, as indicated above. It consists of smaller sub-phases, which would start every two to four months depending on sales absorption. Construction activities would utilize standard construction equipment, including earth-moving equipment, trucks, and forklifts. Construction activities and construction staging would mainly occur within the Project site boundaries. Implementation of traffic control measures during demolition and construction activities would minimize obstruction of vehicular traffic on public roadways in the vicinity of the Project site. During the grading and construction, fire/emergency access to the site would be maintained in compliance with California Fire Code Chapter 33, Fire Safety during Construction and Demolition, as well as Huntington Beach Fire Code Section 17.56.480. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 5 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigotion Monitoring and Reporting Program INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS The proposed utility improvements would consist of private storm drain, private sewer system including a lift station, public domestic water system, and a private water quality facility. The majority of the proposed site drainage would be conveyed via surface flow and a series of catch basins and storm drain pipes to drain in the southeasterly direction to a detention vault. The detention vault would detain peak storm flows and store the water quality treatment volume. The low flows would be pumped up from the detention vault to a Modular Wetland System for treatment. The treated and detained storm flows would exit the site to a proposed public storm drain connection in Effingham Drive through the City's Gisler Park parking lot and by street flow onto Strathmoor Lane. 6 GISLER RESIDENTIAL. PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Progrom GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) Aesthetics RR AIiS-1 Design Review Board.As part of the entitlement Project Applicant/ During Design City of Huntington and review by the Design Review Board, the Developer Review Beach Community Project Applicant shall submit proposed site Development development and building plans for the review and Department approval by the City.The City shall review these plans for compliance with pertinent requirmnents in the General Plan, Huntington Bench Zoning and Sl17)(11l'IS10o Ordinance and Design Guidelines. Air Quality RR AQ-1 All construction activities shall be cnnducled in Project Applicant/ During City of Huntington compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management Developer consnvction Reach Public Works DiStrict'S Rule 403, Fugitive Dust,for controlling Department fugitive dnstand avoiding nuismse.Contractor compliance with Rule 403 requirements shall be mandated in the contractor's specifications. RR AQ-Z All construction activitieS shall be conducto(l in Project Applicant/ During City of Huntington compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management Developer/ consh action (at Beach Public Works District Rule 402, Nuisance,which slates that a project Construction the time of Depart matt shall not "discharge from any source whatsoever Such Contractor mobilization of quantities of air contaminants or other material which each applicable cause injury,detriment,nuisance,m'annoyance to any unit of considerable number of persons or to the public,or equipment) which endanger the comfort, repose,health or Safety, of any such persons or the public,or which cause,or 1MVe M natural tendency to cause,injury ur damage to bnSllleSS or property". GISI.Iiii RESIDENTIA1. PROJECT 7 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timingof Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) Biological Resources RR 1310-1 Per the City of Huntington Reach-Memorandum CI- Project Applicant/ Prior to City of Huntington 74-'I'rec Replacement for CIiQA Compliance,dated Developer landscaping plan 13each Collin]till ity October 1,200S, projects built since 1973 have been approval Development required to comply with CEQA, 1113%SO landscaping Department requirements,anti approved landscaping plan,if applicable.On these projects,removal of mature trees as part of remodel or relieve 10pnlent requires replacement on a 1:1 basis (one 36-inch box trees for every tree removed).In general,lame suture trees are defined has having a mininwm 10-inch diameter trunk at approximately 4 feet height from the adjoining ground. MM 1310-1 Prior to the issuance of-any grading permits, the Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington Comnurnity Development Directorordesigneeshall Developer of grading Huach Community verify that the fallowing requirements for nesting permit Development hirds and precm)struction survey are completed by Department the Project Applicant: • The start of site-preparation activities shall be schCdUICd outside of the hind nesting and breeding season (typically March 1 through August IS)- If site-preparation activities start during the nestingsoason,a qualified Rialugist shall conduct a nesting bird survey in potential Hid nesting areas within 200 feet of any proposed disturbance.The survey shall he conducted no more than three clays prior to the start of any ground disturbance activities. E3 Gisi.1:12 RESIDENTIAL PROIECT INITIAL STUDY / h11TIGA'I'EU NEGATIVE DHCLARATION Mitigation Monitor'ii cl and Reporting Prggr can GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for 'riming of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) • If.dive nests of bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (META) and/or the California fish and Game Code (which, together, apply to all native nesting bird species)are present in the impact area or within 200 Ieet of the impact area,a temporary buffer fence shall he erected a minintt ni ol'200 feet around the nest site.This temporary buffer may be greater or lesser depending nn thu bird species and type of disturbance,as determined by the Biologist. • Clearing and/orconstruclion within temporarily fenced areas shall he postponed or halted Until juveniles have fledged from the nest and there is no evidence of a second nesting attempt.The Biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when disturbance activities occur near active nest areas to ensure that nn inadvertent impacts on these nests would occur. Cultural Resources RRCUL-1 IfhunhanremaillS are encounteredduringany ProjeclApplicant/ Duringground City of Huntington Project-related ground-disturbing activities,Section Developer/ disturbing Beach Conununity 70S0.5 of the California Ilealth and Safety Code states Monitor activities Development that no IUrther disturbance shall Occur Until the Department County Coroner has matte a determination of Origin and disposition of the materials pursuant to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code.The provisions of Section 15004.5 of the California Environmental QUality Act Guidelines shall also be followed.The County Coroner must be notified of the GISI.IiR RESIDENTIAL 1)R011:C'f 9 INITIAL S'I'UDY / MITIGATED NEGATIvii DECLARATION Mitigation Aonitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric,the Coroner shall notify die Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC).The NAHC Will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent (MLD).With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative,the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery.The descendent must complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NA11C.The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials."These requirements shall be included as notes on the contractor specification and verified by the Community Development Departunent, prior to issuance of grading permits.This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City in consultation with the County Coroner. MM CIIL-I A qualilied archaeologist(the "Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington Archaeologist") thetnneets tile Secretary ofinterior archaeologist of,the first Beach Community Standards (S01)shall be retained prior to the start of grading permit Development grading for Project-related construction.The Project Departnient Archaeologist shall monitor all ground-disturbing activities within the areas of native soil (i.e.,below existing areas of artificial fill fivnn previous construction). If archaeological or historical reSOnree'S are encountered during iInplenrentaLion of any phase of the Project,the Project Archaeologist will be allowed to temporarily divert or redirect grading or excavation activities in the vicinity of the find in order to make an evaluation of the find. 10 GISLER RESMENTIAL PRoli;cr INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATE[) NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) Geology and Soils RR GIiO-'1. The Project Shall be designed and consu'ucted in Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington ccnnpliance with the 2019 California Building Code Developer of grading and (teach Public Works (CBC) Design Parameters or the most current CBC building permits Department and adopted in the City's Municipal Code. Building Division RR GEO-2 Soil Quality.The site's soil quality shall comply with Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington the requirements stated in 1161'1)'s City Specification's Developer of grading and Beach Fire No.,129 and No.,131-92 for residential use. building permitS Department MM GBO-1 Prior to issuance of grading permit,site preparation Project Applicant/ Prior t0 issuance City of Huntington shall follow the recommendations in the Preliminary Developer ol'a grading BCaCh Public Works Geotec'hnicul Evuluation and Desryn Recommenrlotions permit, Dupartment and for Proposed Residential Development,Strathmoor Building Division Lane, North of Gisler Park and (Nest o/'.Stratluruxn Lane, City of Hunting(too (Teach, California (dated july 28,2020) and additional future Site-specific,design- level geotechnical investigations of the Project. Based on the Geotechnical livaluation, recommendations to be included in the ProjectSpecificntionS pertain to Site I?arthwork, Preliminary Foundation Recommendations,Soil Bearing and Lateral Resistance, Lateral Barth Pressures for Retaining Walls,Soil Corrosivity,Control of Surface Water and Drainage Control,Subsurface Water Infiltration, Preliminary Asphalt Concrete Pavement Sections, Nunslruchmal Concrete Flatwork,Geotechnical Plan Review,and Geotechnical Observation and Testing During Construction. GISLER RISID1.NTIAL PROJECT 1 ] INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATM) NECATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reportit y Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) MM GLO-Z In the event paleontological resources are Project Applicant/ During City of Huntington encountered during construction,ground-diSturbing Developer construction Heath Community activity Shall cease. It is recommended that a activities Development Qualified Paleontologist that meets the Society for Department Vertebrate Paleontology(SVP) he retained by the Applicant to examine the materials encountered, assess the nature and extent of the find,and reconnniend a course of action to fm-rher investigate Mid protect or recover and salvage those resources that have been encountered. Criteria for discard of specific fossil specimens shall he made explicit. If a Qualified Palemtulogist determines that impacts to a sample containing significant paleontological ttsout'ces rmnot be avoided by Project planning, then recovery may be applied.Actions may include recovering a sample of the fossiliferous material prior to construction; monitoring work and halting construction if an important fossil needs to be recovered;and/or cleaning, identifying,and cataloging specimens for curation and research purposes.The cost associated with recovery,salvage, and treatment shall be borne by the Applicant.All recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation by the Qualified Paleontologist. Resources Shall be identilied and curated into an established accredited professional repository.The Qualified Paleontologist shall have a repository agreement in hand prior to initiating recovery of the resource. 12 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PRDIIi C'r INITIAL STUDY / MI'I'IGA'1'ISD NEGATIVE DP.CLAIiATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) Greenhouse Gas Emissions RR GIIG-1 The Project shall be designed in accordance with the Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington applicable Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Developer of each building Beach Building Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Californi❑ permit Division Code of Regulations jCCR),Title 24, Part G).These standards are updated, nominally every three years, to incorporate improved energy efficiency technologies and methods.The Building Manager,(it- designee shall ensure compliance prior to the issuance of each building permit.The 2019 Title 24 Energy Efficiency standards for residential uses require that solar photovoltaic electricity be installed equal to the amount used annually. RR GIIG-2 Projects Shall be designed in accordance with the Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington applicable California Green Building Standards Developer of each building Beach Building (CALGreen) Code (24 CCR I1).The Building Manager, permit Division or designee shall ensure compliance prior to the issuance of each building permit. Hazards and Hazardous Materials RR HA7.-1 The demolition contractor shall comply with the Project Applicant; Prior to issuance City of Huntington requirements of Tide B of the California Code of Developer of demolition Beach Community Regulations (Section 1932.1-1,cad) regarding the permits Development removal of lead-hased paint or other materials Department containing lead.The regulations set exposure limits, exposure monitoring, respiratory protection,and good working practices by workers exposed to lead. Lead-contaminated debris and other wastes shall be removed and monitored by contractors with (iISI.IiR RESIVIENTIAI. PROJECT 13 INITIAL, STUDY / MLTIGATU NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) appropriate certifications from the California Department of Health Services and disposed ol'in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Health and Safety Code. RR IIA'L-2 The demolition contractor shall comply with the Project Applicant Prior to issuance City of Huntington South Coast Air Quality Management District's of demolition Beach Community (S(:AQMD's) Rule 1,103,which provides guidelines for permits Development the proper removal and disposal of asbestos- Department containing materials.In accordance with Rule 1,103, prior to the demolition, renovation, rehabilitation or alteration of structures that may contain asbestos,an asbuSte5 survey shall be performed by a Certified Asbestos Consultant (certified by the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration [CalOSHAI) to identify building materials that contain ashestos. Removal of the ashestos shall then include prior notification of the SCAQMD and compliance with removal procedures and time schedules; asbestos handling and clean-up procedures and storage,disposal,and landlilling requirements under Rule 1,103. RR HA7.-3 The demolition contractor shall comply with the Project Applicant Prior to issuance City of Huntington California Ilealth and Safety Cocle(Section 39650 et of demolition Beach Connnunity seq.)and the California Code of Regulations (Title B, permits Development Section 1529),which prohibit emissions of asbestos Department front asbestos related demolition or construction activities; require medical examinations and monitoring of employees engaged in activities that could disturb asbestos; specify precautions and safe h GISLEIt RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGA'I'lvli DECLARATION Mit{potion Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) work practices that most be followed to ntinintire the potential for the release of asbestos fibers; and require notice to federal and local government agencies prior to beginning renovation or demolidorl that could disturb asbestos. Hydrology and Water Quality RR HWQ-1 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington the issuance of any grading or building permits,the Developer of grading or Reach Public Works Project Applicant shall demonstrate compliance with huildutg permits Department California's General Permit for Stornuwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity by Providing a copy of the Notice of Intent(N01) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent 110tificaCion of the issuance ofa Waste Discharge Identilicalion (WDID) Number or other proof of filing in a manner meeting the satisfaction of the City's Department of Public Works. Projects subject to this requirement shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during all phases of construction.A copy of the current SWI'I'I'shall be kept at the construction site and be available for State and City review on requeSt. RR HWQ-Z General Waste Discharge Requirements. Prior to Project Applicant Prior to issuance City of Huntington the issuance of any grading or building Permits,if of grading 0r Reach Public Works construction dewatering mr discharges from other building permits Department specific activities (e.g.,dewatering from subterranean seepage,Potable water system maintenance discharges, Rre hydrant Rushing,etc.) are required, GISLIi It RIisi1)FNTIA1. PROJECT 15 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATI?D NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reportic>,(d Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for riming of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) the Project Applicant shall notify the Santa Ana RWQCIi and any discharges into surGtce waters shall be conducted in compliance With the Santa Ana RWQCR's Order No. RB-2015-0004 (NI'DES No. CAG998001),which includes General Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for(lischm•gus to surface Water that pose an insignificant(de minimis) threat to water quality.The General WDRs include provisions mandating notification, Lusting,and reporting of(lewatering and testing-related discharges,and contain numeric and performance- based effluent limits depending upon the type of discharge. RR 14WQ-3 Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to the Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington issuance of any grading or building permits, the Developer of grading or Reach PUhllc Works Project Applicant shall submit for review and building permits Department approval by the CIIV'S Public Works Department,the final Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying BuSL Management Practices (RMPs) that address Pollutants of Concern. The WVP shall comply with the requirements of the Orange County MS4 Permit, the Orange County Drainage Area Management Hall (DAMP), Model WQMP,and Technical Guidance Manual,and the City,% Locol Implementation Platt (LI1'),Citywide Urban Runoff Management Plan (CIIRMP), Project WQMP Preparation Guidance Manual,and pertinent regulations in the Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, Ute Project Applicant shall demonstrate to 16 GISLI?R RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) the satisfaction of the City's Public Works Department the following: • All sU-uctural RMPS described in the Project:~ approved WQMP have been implemented, ConStructed,and insLdled in conformance With approved plans and specifications; • Demonstrate that the Project Applicant has Complied With all non-structtu-al 13MPs described in the Project's WQMP; • Provide certifications from the Engincer of Record or landscape Architect that the LID 13MPs and treatment control EMPS Were constructed and installed per the approved plans and specifications; • Copies of the Project's approved WQMP (With attached 0&M Plan and Educational Materials) ore available for each of the initial occupants and tenants of the Project; and • The Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions (CC&Rs) includes pertinent 13MPs in the approved WQMP and O&M Plan. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 17 INITIAL STUDY / NUTIGATm) NI?GA'f IVI,- DECLARATION Mitigation MonitorhW and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Tinting of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) RR HWQ-h Grading and Erosion Control Plans. Prior to the Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntingum issuance of any grading permit, the Project Developer ofa grading Reach Public Works Applicant/Developer shall submit for reVICW Mad permit Department approval by the City's Public Works Department, the grading and erosion control plans for the Project The plans shall demonstrate that proposed grading and excavation activities on the site shall include the installation ofpernMnculand semi-permanent, erosion control measures in compliance with pertinent requirements of the City's Grading and Excavation Code,as contained in Chapter 17.05 of the Municipal Code. RR II WQ-5 Full Capture Systems. In compliance with the During Prior in issuance City of Huntington Statewide'frash Provisions in Section 13383 of the construction of certificates of Beach Public Works Water Code,all BMPs shall he state certified full occupancy Department capture systenis to ensure that trash does is not discharged ofl=site. RR HWQ-G Storm Drainage Plan. Prior to the issuance of any Project Applicant/ 1'rimr to issuance City of Huntington grading or building permits,the Project Applicant Developer ofgrading or Public Works Shall submit Ibr review and approval by the City's building permits Department Public Works Department,the storm drainage plan for the Project'rhe plan shall include the installation of an on-site Sturm drain system that would accommodate 100-year flood Bows,in accordance With Chapter 255 of the City's Municipal Code,the OrMige County Hydrology Manual,and other City specifications. In addition, the 1'roject Applicant shall pay the applicable fees for the City's local drainage 18 GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE I)ECLARATION Mitigation MonitorinW and Reporting Pracgram GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) fund in accordance with Chapter 14.48 of the Municipal Code. Prior to the approval of final inspection,the on-site storm chain system shall be constructed,or provide evidence of financial Security(Such as bonding),in a manner meeting the approval of the City's Public Works Department:. Noise RR N01-1 The Project shall ctnnply with the City of fiuntington Project Applicant/ During City of fiuntington Reach Municipal Code Chapter 8.40, Noise Control. Developer constvction Reach Community activities Development Department MM N01-1 'file Applicant shall require that all const I000n Project Applicant/ During City of Huntington contactors restrict the operation of the following Developer construction Reach Community construction equipment to beyond 25 feet from off- activities Development and site buildings: vibratory rollers and other vehicles Public Works with a weight of greater than 24 tans. Smaller Departments eenStr'll Cl10n equipment could be used within these distances. Public Set-vices RR PS-1 PriOrto the issuanceofcertilicateofnccupancy0r Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington final huilding permitapproval,the Project Developel of certificate of Heach Community Applicant/Developer shall pay the required occupmtcy or final Development development impact fees for lire Suppression huilding permit Department facilities,as required by fiuntington Beach Municipal approval Code Chapter 17.74. GISI.mz RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 19 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Prgtjrtrm GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) RR PS-2 During Project construction, fire/Emergency Access Project Applicant/ During Project City of Huntington and Site Safety shall be maintained in compliance Developer construction Beach fire with California fire Code(CPC) Chapter 33, fire phases Department Safety during Construction and Demolition. RR PS-3 Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy or Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of I-luntington final building permit approval,the Project Developer of certificate of Beads Community Applicant/Developershall pay required development occupancy or final Development impact fees for police facilities as required by building permit Department I-Iuotfngton Beach Municipal Code Chapter 17.75. approval RR PS-h The Project Applicant/Developer shall pay all Project Applicant/ At building permit City of Iluntington applicable development impact fees in effect at. Use Developer issuance Beach Community time of building permit issuance to the Huntington Development Beach City School and Union High School Districts to Deparullunt cover additional school services required by the new development.The applicable development impact fees would be consistent with SI3 50. 1111 PS-S The Applicant shall comply with the Iluntington Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington Beach General Plan requirement of 5 acres of Developer of certificate of Beach Community parkland per 1,000 ITSidents through paynhent of in- occupancy m final Development lieu fees for improvements to existing City parks,to building permit Department the satisfaction of the Community Services approval Department, Prior to the issuance ol'certificate of occupancy ur final huilding permit approval. RR PS-6 Prior to file issuance of certificate of occupancy or Project Applicant/ Prior to issuance City of Huntington final building permit approval, the Project Developer of certificate of Beach Community Applicant/Developer shall pay required library occupancy or final Development development impact fees as required by Huntington building permit Department Beach Municipal Cnde Chapter 17,67. approval ZO GISLER REsii)ENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL. STUDY / MITIGA• I-M NEGATIVE DECLAILATION Mitigut:ion Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) Recreation RR PS-S,ahove,is applicable. Transportation/T ra ffi c RR TRAN-1 To ensure impacts to the Surrounding Street system Project Applicant, Prior to City of I luntington are kept atit mininunn,a Construction Management Construction conunencement Beach Public Works flan shall be developed in coordination with the City Contractor of Consh'UCtlO❑ Department Of Huntington Beach, prior to commencement of construction.The Construction Management flan shall naect standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD) as Well as City of Iuntington 13each requireurents. The Plan shall: • Address traffic control for any street closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation. • Identify the routes that construction vehicles Would utilize for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping,WindowS, etc.),to access the project site,traffic controls and detours,and proposed construction phasing plan for the proposed project. • Specify the treat"S (luring Which transport activities can occur and methods to Mitigate construction-related impacts to adjacent streets. GISLIM RESIDENTIAL Prtojl:c'r 21 INITIAI. STUDY / N11TICATED NFGATIVI'. DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Heportir;q Prggrmn GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) • Keep all haul routes clean and free of debris including but not lilliked to gavel and elirt as a result of its operations.The Applicant shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the City Fngineer(or representative of the City Engineer), of any material,which may have been spilled,tracked,or blown onto adjacent streets or,areas. • All hauling or transport of over-size loads behveen the hours of 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM Only, Monday through Friday, unless approved otherwise by the City I:ngtncer. No hauling or transport shall he alloweel during nighttime hours,weekends or. Federal holidays. • Require that haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall at all times yield to public traffic. • Include that if hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement,street,curb, and/or gutter along the haul route,the Applicant shall be fully responsible for repairs.The repairs shall he completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • Require that all construction-related parking and staging of vehicles will be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and will occur on- site. 22 GISLER RESIDEN'rIAL I ROJECT INH IAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) MM TRAN-1 Intersection No.6- Rrookhursl Street at Project Applicant Prior to issuance City of Huntington llamilton Avenue. Prior io issuance of building ora building Reach I'ublic Works permits, the Project Applicantshall provide it fair permit Department share contrihulion toward lire modification of the existing traffic signal to provide westbound right- Will overlap phase during the I'M peak period (i.e., 4:00 PM -6:00 PM). Tribal Cultural Resources RRTCR-1 Ifhumanremainsare encountered during any Project Applicant [)]-for*to City ofIluntington Project-related ground-distw-biog activities,Section commencemait Beach Community 7050.5 of the California Ilealth and Safety Corte of any ground Development states that no further disturbance shall occur until disturbance Department the County Coroner has made a determination of activities of origin and disposition of the materials put:eu Ult to previously Section 5097.913 of the California Public Resources undisturbed soil, Code The provisions of Section 15064.5 of the or.soil that has California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines not been shall also be followed.The Cmmty Coroner must be previously notified of the find immediately. If the remains are monitored determined to he prehistoric, the Coroner shall notily the Native American heritage Commission (NAIIC).The NAHC will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent(MI M).With the permission of' the landowner or,his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery.The descendent must complete the inspection within 24 hours of notification by the NAI IC.The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials.These requironlenls GISI.Ii It RESIDENTIAL. PROJECT 23 INITIAL. STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigation Monitorirry and Reporting Program GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) shall he included as notes on the contractor Specification and verifier) by the Coununity Development Department, prior to issuance of grading permits. 'I'his measure shall be innplononted to the satisfaction ol'the City in consultation with the County Coroner. MM TCR-1 Prior to the commencement of any ground Project Applicant Prior to City of Huntington disturbing activity at the project site,the Project commencement Beach Community Applicant shall retain a Native American Monitor ofany ground Duvalopmcnl prior to the issuance of any pmrmit necessary to disturbing Department commence a ground-disturbing activity.'I'he'I'ribal activities of Monitor will only be present on-site during the previously construction phases that involve ground-disturbing undisturbed soil activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined or soil that has by the Tribe as activities that may include,but are not been not limited to, pavement removal, potholing of previously auguring,grubbing, tree removals, baring,grading, monitored excavation, drilling,and trenching,within the project area.The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations,soil,and any cultural materials ident.ilicd.The on-site monitoring Shall end when all ground-disturbing activities on the project site are completed, or.when the-Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that all upcoming ground-disturbing activities at the project site have little to no potential for intpacting-I'ribal CUltUral Resources. Upon discovery ofany Tribal Cultural Resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the lind (nut less than tine 24 GIsi.I:R RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATEr) NEGATM; DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Frograrn GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) surrounding 100 feet) wail the find can be assessed. All Tribal CLIRta'al liesourCCS unearthed by Project activiGCS Shall he evaluated by the quolificd Archaeologist and Tribal Munitorapproved by the Gmsulling Tribe. If the resnurceS are Native American in origin, the Consulting Tribe will retain it/them in the farm and/or m:mner LlIc Tribe deems appropriate, for educational,cultural and/nr historic purpoSCS. I f human remains and/or grave goods are discovered or recognized at the project Site,all ground disturbance Shall immediately cease,and the county coroner shall be notified per Public Resources Code Section 5097.98,and Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5. Human remains and grave/burial goads Shall be treated alike per California Public Resources Code section 5097.98(d)(1) and (2).Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.511]). lfa non-Native American resource is determined by the qualifiCd archaeologist to Constitute a "historical resource"or "unique archaeological resource,"time nlluonene and funding sulficient to allow lur implementation nfavoidance nt¢tsures,Orapprupriate Ill itigMion, most he available.The treatment plan estahlished for the resources shall be in accordance with C!.QA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code (PRC)Sections 210812(h) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e.,avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in Gist.tili RESIDENTIAL PI20jGG1 25 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DI?CLARATioN Mit:igutian Monitoring um/Reportir>,g PI-ogrmn GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) place is not feasible,treannent may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any, historic archaeological material that is not Native American in Origin shall be coshed at a public, non- profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History MUSCUiI of Los Angeles County or the fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material,it shall be offered to a local School 01-historical society in the area for educational purposes. Utilities and Service Systems RR UI'L-1 Water service to the Project, including application for Project Applicant During final City of I luutington water service,service connections, water rates, lire design/plan check Beach Public Works service,and water mains, shall be constructed and Department provided in accordance with Title 14,Water and Sewer,of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. RR U'1'I:2 In accordance with the Public Works' requirements Project Applicant Prior to iSAMOCe City of Huntington (I-Iuntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance of grading Beach Public Works 230.84 and Municipal Code 14.36.010),during the permit Department final design/plan check,the Applicant shall prepare a Sewer study,Which Would include a 14-day or longer- flow test data and subnhit to the Public Works Department for review and approval.'file location and number of Monitoring test sites shall be determined by the Public Works Department.The sanitary sewer system shall be designed and 26 GISLGR RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGAITt) NI:GATIvii DECLARATION Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting prrogranl GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Completion Date Responsible for Timing of Responsibility for (Signature Mitigation Measures Implementation Mitigation Monitoring Required) constructed to Serve the development,including any offsite improvements necessary to accommodate any increased flow associated With the project. RR UTL-3 The Project Applicant Shall pay the applicable Project Applicant Al building permit City of Iluntiogtan Connection Pee Program capital facilities fees to the issuance Beach PUbliC Worley Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD),as Deparhnent authorized by the Calilirnia Health and Safety Cade SectionS 5400 to 5474. RR UTI.-4 The Project shall be designed and constructed With Project Applicant Prior to issuance City of lluntington Water-efficient flxLUITS and Systems,aS required by ofa building Beach Building the CALGreen Code. permit Division RR UTL-5 The Project contractor shall recycle, reuse,and/or Project Applicant Prior to issuance City of Huntington Salvage at least 65 percent of demolition and of cemolition Beach Building construction debris, in accordance With Section 4.408 permit Division of the CALGreen Code. GISLER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 27 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 21 �/ 47 46 5 44 43 4 41� i�0 39 38 37 75 82 II I �I J --- — — — - - --- o . 20 I I W 1 ow �N TREET ow w� Q-moo ow w ow o — c LOT F 1 19 P RCEL _ - — a 74 83 48 49 t 50 51 52 53 54 56 57 58 — — 18rcN 73 I 84 0 get LOT K I I I I I I I ISZ I 17 ` / SO LOT I I 72 -I 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 - 16 �I — rc t— — — 71 "; x ne \ SS— I z — OT uw — — w o - — — - w - 70 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 LOT (CIjY OF-HUI — na °x nx ni GISUER P, RK� a v.v ne nx x nx n^ a % �v rL- .H `-�„ - iE-�- - \�`-�1i) -SITE MAP;° «-'� -i- - fE C )- ) E-G 1" = 100' TRACT EXIST. BOUNDARY RAW 51 .0' PROP. 26.0' 25.0' LOTLINE 52.0' 1 DEDICATION I 40.0 40.0' (5.0') DW . I I 5.5' 0.5' 20.0' 1 20.0' 20.0' � 20.0' I 7 1I2 I 39 t 38 �I 37 °I -H 15't o R3, a F C 137' q- 2rt 26't �:50'f 50't 50'f 50'f 50'f 50't 487 �2 � - - - LOT D C 50'f 50't s0't 50't 50't 50't 37't 26't 9 22't - 41 •� o �n v -HI �HI �I II � �I I I I 52 �I 53 �I 54 ,� 55 �:I 56 �, 57 ,rn 58 0 LOT I � ' 2 5o't so't I so'f I so't i so't so't 50't - 5 -H I Zo 63 65 �I 64 �I �I 62 �� 61 �I 60 ml 59 �I (EPO'± 50'f s0't 50't 50't 50't 37't 1 � 11.3PAD I 11.OPAD I 10.7PAD I 10.5PAD I 10.2PAD 9.9PAD 9.9PAD I r8.85TCFr 25 2 2 8.45TC 8.40TC 7.95FL-GB "A" STREET 9 47TC 7.90FL-LP _ _8.97FL 9.47TC µ� ,95FL-GB -HP 0.5% 8.97FL LOT D 0.5% 8.90FL-LP o f 8.80T / h .30E LHP p• 8.8 8.30 -H 11.3PAD I 11.OPAD I 10.7PAD 10.5PAD 10.2PAD I 9.9PAD C 9.9PAD III 52 I 53 54 I 55 I 56 57 2 58 of I I 8.40T LOT 1 7.900E I P _ H=t.2' 1I - - I _ _ I _ _ I _ _ I _ 7790. it of I 'ROP. REIAININ(: I I 8 75T NALL 8.25FLLHP 8.7 11 I �r', . F -a P 65 64 63 I 62 61 60 I 59 �8.5 Ti aj 10.1 PAD I 10.3PAD IF 10.2PAD I 10.2PAD I 10.3PAD 10.2PAD I 10.1 PAD 8.O F -LP °�`'8 50 A 2 ^ 8.00E LP 2 �s. &t ri 8.60TC 8.60TC 9.00TC 8.94T 8.10FL-LP 9.00TC 8.10FL-LP 8.50FL-HP 8.60 8.44 - P - A Inpl �L-P 8.60 � 9TOOTC- 6 10/r-8 T AT 8.60TC M 8.50FL-HHP B. OFL-LP ��` VARIES EXIST. GRADE �r TOP OF 0.0 T 60 0 z = � E RET. WALL I � ��` S VARIES 6.0' w = 20.0 14.0 TO 20.0 SDWK. GAP FILLED b WITH FOAM i EXIST. GRADE CURB & GUTTER PER CITY STD. 202 EET TYPICAL SECTION -ROM 40' TO 28' F AT WESTERLY PL G 2 N.T.S 2 EXCLUDING NORTHWESTERLY LOT (SHEET C-1 FOR NORTHWESTERLY LOT WALL HEIGHT) PROP. LOTLINE PROP. 6.0' 1L LOTLINE 3 SDWK. ' 1 14.0' 6 REMOVE PROP. 6.0' P.A. I EXIST. WALL I I GRADE EXIST rl1 1 TOP OF GRADE x w -H it I RET. WALL CURB & _ w Z GUTTER PER '� Y,X �c _ _ DIVERSION ^ 0l STRUCTURE CITY STD. 202 t �� r rVicT npAnp PLAN 38 �1.115 I 5 47z 46 45 Q 44 43 Q 42 „ 41 Q 40 7 ---I ------5 I I PL,�/N1181 P N 2C P N 2A P ICI, r� l N I BA - _ p /A/�� P p(/gt1,-`,yy I r ��[ 1�1 1 �Q I• !J �� QU QL1 LJLJ - ---- - \ 'K I I ' I I' I I_: t I 4 I I 1I1'•' , I. � •.. P N I C \ _ _ --- j L 25.0 a Q cn 25' corner visibility cutoff, typ. " A " S t r e e t 20 i 25.o' PLAN 3A IS' LI - 1 9 i— —I — _- - I VY V • ,rJ`ll V V • VV Vi �D VP - N 3A• P M1.c,— - N 2B [:PLAN- zFAIN A P B P N- _ -- N2C 15' 48 Q 49 50 51 52 �] 53 * i 54 Q 55 15rn I I I J , P I N N N I 17 �,-i-- � 1 �° 69 68 67� 66 65 Q 64 63 Q 62 15' P 1f I C N 2A P N- C L2B PLI�QQ �11I,� N 1B i • P QQ � P• QQ 15 • /l/l ; 0� • QQ 0� l it LAN 3B N \\``N�-. 'I_!_-1—_I' J ' 1 r { I� a I I I I I Street I •I LOT B �� i I — I n I — AN 2A ,\�/I/ VV VV y V I 1,! 11 VV V VV I• _ _. VV V I P N 3C I PLAN 2B PLAN IA •PLAN 38 �I PLAN C PLAN 2A PLAN I B P� N 3A P PLAN 2C P N 38 11- -/ 1 t7 9 i3 I �7 Fi 5 f14 / . r� * r � l �•'f-1• per.. WIN I •� C `rY R h e Y - i s ' TRANSFER STATION MOD POURED IN PLA POD - RUBBER SURFP 2642 SO FT GEO Q CLIMBER Q +} CATWALK t ACCESS 54. GATE �t. TRANSITION , . CLIMBER ,S- s r MOUNT � � - --tea '� PLAYCUBES 10-0 BELLS tTREASURE TUMBL ADA PANEL(deck) STAIRS h TWIST SLIDE SHOUT STOREFRON l (ground) 'El - TOWER ARCH + CLIMBER BRIDGE CLIFF -- POST MOUNT HANGER 3 Bb @ SCAVENGER PIPE WALL of HUNT PANEL Wit LOWER 1 r R TELESCOPE , ��0�XIII ADA STEP TUBE SLIDE SLITHER 'Partial Tube or Open Slide Per City SLIDE TWISTED CLIMBER i =i 13 0 REQUIIEU 0 = 4 REOLMIEL 4 ../ :S: 3 REOIIIR. 3 V . S' l � L - � \1�A �•T a, �v'{'�vv 1L},�\�� 'R� `lM rY �t Y�_ f i^' .fA vf. Y 4 r P lath aii�°`l�' ` "14it�3 ,r•P� .'fT`T �F:Y?f'MvlStFi• � ��� ' : - � ti '��!Lt t•.y �w}� �f V(� f v �� �w+ l.�..1 l �L 'R �� t'� �{11 t��t 7w�iA�'��thi �4�p• V � ��ll .g-� w��,.• � �i M��c .f tL ^S ����l �l � ��C;�' ,\ L ., ` i.'{��;• ��•$''���y��+.' �1 a• ,�•� �`!��'T. Slr 1 �.w`f" �` S�'�`"1�'�i��� ''1 �tiS. a ti!y^����yg�l`t... `v� :��.e� Sv���t .�.��•y�,'�rs '��� ' .. LS�� y'�*Sp�` ♦ --••� �. -•� •`��J v��n'� 'yam �Ir-+.�i.b. � t,. �� +•«f IL.^ : .M Ni. �`.�T .^`s,♦ yyc `�' +K`IV1Q.. R� •^t � ' �p .`C ,.C�ri '�t� �� `�"yy. « ,M��� +�..•. �"2J.. 1�;sk�,l, ."� � 1Q,y �j�.�, tik1• ,•, ,�`aT�xv f!*F.i+��`��.��� �-yyy;Lti ����ti, „�`���a+S`��`�� YM� '�y��t 4:•e ����,�ty � n .a V hk `, �,.i( 0,4l;'y�r r* `h,i \ir '4t1 ,; • LL \ 'wi' .'/i 'Tv.•'`.'�. �A'� � `!* . ,'`K. _ V,4, .tt.�`Y.' 't.7�• ' `: • r; �?�r'• jy`�k^ * wt� pt w .� i�t� at 7�♦ ti,. �+ - :d _ 1: k�r t�1� , 't t��;^i��'4� r"!1 ���� i ypst`ts;�r+t\�e�`f �Lt3�'• 1ple:s�* *. ��aY�'' 7"•�_�� < �.+ .a 4ti.�i�:: -ly �,1j�-�'Y�ltj .-* 7 ci,�'Lf,��A �..``S-�`(. i,I.t''1` ,'ate' . 'a1f�C.+U ,`"l''•'2 •� -.r�.',• ""'' w "' -.y�� U • }�4` K,•*i WSjY�.it '' �n ' `'7 ;; Y .M ! ��"�1 .'�.' � `�t .�y •t �"� �. v` a +1� ',N r1 � r1i t�{ " � j�.•7 � h "4`i't•',141 .c�� �i�y`L�' �: Z �� '�{ � � �8�• '♦ er f`���ij*t+�•,.� '`• 1 ,i�f ���`••��'�'+.�, v 'Y �yl ��l�o 'i .� •�`� �_. ` !ttyy��t v�-,F �� �.`.�;�•�;�� V Y .�CV!� �r 4T'•�:i~ � ��,�, �. �*l�` ' �. v . � � ;� `�fw•�♦ �- �� .a iJF ?i. i!'�.7�` .t.�r..;i'ryJ�.'�j�.:.i::`a:4:•:�:��:�Y�2:�c��:'v �Y"Z►: . � �5��'.`�':_' "24i�a: ``i�=cei �:`�.�e:\' ��:A.��.`c1� { : 1 14 ff f r'w ,, }y af! ♦ a. . F,y _ti ,7 \,. • r r• \ �Lt)'�/,�fi•Sv. Silt Y'Sa a ./ � I1Mw• f' •f- C ,� } k {C,i !'1*ti� t /4;' I4� w�\��, •I , , 't� •�\ � �x;.� - a'�r'?E.'J ry l�}. 'f`f .Tl �'���."7 � �Ya `t �•. f?.�4�. ;��ry 44� ��,a., . a i +f [� ..�� r >• . Y' 4' 1 1 Zv. 'ih1" w: as �1 f � ., r���' 'S•;.lVt �g•.Tr•�'~•'ti• �� i'�j'��r:���' • I'Fi'� f���'(..1'J�.;•ci•,:ti'•t�µ��'••aY+�M�+i.'y, +(- r!e•F-Y���� ���4••�_ 4ii1 v�.l .j� fia�k•. `�'' \ %.if a.J• r •!b /��1�''•�' tt�•I•It)rr;� �^ � .71!' r.. V�..:YI«,jc� � �ty S� �,�yw�,Q,•••L•.?..tY� 4.a���� lk F .•. ,r^�'�. �: �i�',�s •�?-1,hKyr�.r:/,:•` �ja.'f��ty-L,.. ���h. �i:f+bj•..tiyV� • rl•.:�s'r' �:(tf! .:�`: "' �Pt �y.{�/�5r ram. ��y{.i ♦ "e � {�f dt.{ !1 a { i Jl �AI'(fy.'LI�iD'. �.'..V�.. �•�+��..!Y3�if a •]' ,,,,.ti�'�i1.;7 x'A. 7j� i. .a.:�; v rt�.�'i -!ti\ .f ,�•� ,r v�4.� / �, ��✓w�•7Y i�D. � G`(. �6�a� -I.�Rt. �.'1•'Ti�• �• .. ''iRa.�t¢Y.-�tf .v Y�vr \ Y •�i_t/rKdyut►. �t.��,/Y{��,y,.4''!1�'j{`�, •,/,�U •I•�" •r;!y�• �Y�• a' ,s•ta'P4.•; i/} ; "Ni. .!' a`. .��py7�w . 1¢ji"� .�. ,yFi'' •►ir,�y ,,,���N �. �f� 'fs �v.�tF•^,V./;�"'S"f �7��:�h,ir+fai�� Y.�r�i�• Y/? i'4 :"��y'� �r�`P1:' �' f Y�ii„�� 7 `jLfT�� ��! fa A���`1t:1R� 3 K '•�-',/•�jc �1•,�YS:Y� 'r,'�"'.' r �i��4 r.• Jha. ,lti, `" 1'a „`a• \;:•':". -•,�, �:./.b s,•'����J�Jr.. d: N:• Lu••`Y�.'�"T� 3r. •�f ♦ ,`.xCrlhk�..'�" r;t�s. ' / •�( •i;♦ } �•h ).�r'• � . ,�,• l� y.��Ca��if�.. l�Qyx�[�•j ti�� f !•• � r,�d/�r+ lti• • f"r `Yt�;1'�j•'' �, d•t`r .. f !G J �. ��•lw'Zr.•:% L�. _�. _i _"2!'ill�Rl'•z=D M, • Y l-.1 .fI � ,•�•L�...L ��?}. �_� • f.�• •� • � ♦ ...-.. Y�•aL'f•�',lSn M'�.�.4•�'. ►/� 2ti4!d--:.��_ �`�.,�:.v !T.'�_r�_ -�A. •f.. ."i�. nl�� 21.v.. 3L -• ll..e_ A_y� 1 I • r z 01"t �r�.. ��r�al _ I.•� ) AL'.�}�♦ ,j y�.�!'`r�„i,- � _ � � t = .� ;, i - r" y' F`` �!� !�� �� y CSC ��. *l.4 T e. ..� ti�i..� �� w` �` Z.. ♦ w s, . . __ ].�• r.�'s.,�,� -�sry. a•� Vic b a.� � -4 "� n.r '. �rY .�.� .;S�«.�,. E�,Z. 7y 4 .+ `57�.,�a `y+s aG. r�,y:r��?iS'�•C,` �c-c "�:r�T�." _ ��k',�T�� � f.t a.. t �7i1�'ycK .=r •--... -y:� �t���;�++��4�4}"_C� ��a� �y����CCC��? r � a "rrt`r w� ` �,. �J s t'�:�•,'��+T';--ii r?2�'-•-+a����..Tr �t`7det �- Y{y'�-}�.;l �`� � �•ti�� may, "-` �w`t. �Z % I.�",s+� . `i,` �}-�'�"'-:is t. ..�sk'k��{�t+.•-C? .�'-. �1p�• �'^- ` '1 �=��:}r'a� {.�_ .�. au_��,- - *✓.�•^f.- .'c-r.- f! ,xE-.r-..����W:r� �-4t ��.+[v,�v"'+�-i--S-f��y Ta1j�w�J � �{�♦.P�y +Sj��. a� �" iarr tt �����:a� ,c# k,S��;1� y`.�a.i'y� �'� +•y`a� �".r�` _ 3!�' �:"F•/R1��1 � ti��j .L' �y �►tom � c,� {��'�'.r •tom'-��.'�..�t f�c9t ems.-s.�.�t•'• V-5-71r�- t � 13 �� ���t+i.�+��1'.r71. !.+ ber ti .ram �!r•'r� y� r"y' .1t.1 ��£ 1ti q' �iT�- I _�"'i - .!i ` art y• _tip �,,�� r .j-' _ Z1 .ALI � ..o �... a t/ �•,� VP/Yi �vl'�•, ���.�vyS' �f '1�.. . l, ` �V�T ��laflt4�'..Y, Yf/1 trl.7 �� 2 \� r yr�1 ,Zr� t*ti.hr fFJi �r t Y�'S?. -0•' �Y l.• J���1S:y�4�� � Y-•: Ytr K'ay� �w� {I 1.'4/•t«•tii. .INAw rt p �a t 1' a General Plan Amendment (GPA) No.20-002 Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 20-002 Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND ) No. 20-002 (Gisler Residential ) 21141 Strathmoor Lane October 19, 2021 Ask n- PUMa• VPROJECT SITE ■ Located at 21141 _ Strathmoor LaneNOR.. ■ 13 .9 gross acre former Gisler School 1 , ■ Gisler School operated from 1973 to Project 1986 r,- ■ Brethren Christian School operated from 2001 to 2019 REQUEST GPA 20-002 - To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RL) f{ 4 f � PS ( RL ) - ' RL 5_p 149-302-17 p - S_p ' 149-302-17 p _ . a P1 , Existing Proposed REQUEST - ZMA 20-002 - To amend the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density JIL- 41 RL ' 2-1 149-302-17 OS-PR R OS PR OS PR R r ir Existing Proposed REQU EST toll MND 20-002 — To analyze the potential environmental 'im acts of the proposed " project .• En. a a t' L 't_1_ Lt_t rr rr , r rr , ri Lt 'Lt__LI -L ( L.Lt ----------- --------------- � _...-.t -A0 co.c.rl..L`L...clrE ,.Lana rt E.•+ LEGEND Q a...x.. - - Q w'r..��r,.�r�E MIE ELrE�., • r,.er Lr..r.. Q t -4�rw lYwq Q E.rrM RE VEST - -- -- Sept. 28, 2021 Planning Commission .J i� granted final approval of: '" " �` _ rip .� tY F '_. • T T V Y Y 1 _ Tentative Tract Map 19136 — To = I _ = i ,.y :io fit, subdivide a 13.9 gross acre site into a Planned Unit Development (PUD) project with 85 SFR numbered lots with reduced . M size and width and 15 lettered lots for ,�I _l-'b=. = .+ private streets, open space, and landscaping 1 - T T , Tyr I...-'I;'.I Conditional Use Permit 20-024 — To allow retaining walls over 2 feet tall topped with a 6 foot tall wall/fence (at western and northeastern corners) RE - T - -- ■ PUD includes residential lots with reduced size and width; code requires applicant to provide community benefits • Lots average 4,952 s.f. and 50 ft. wide (in lieu of minimum 6,000 s.f. and 60 ft. wide in RL zone) ■ Lots from 4,661 to 9,241 s.f. • Most common size 4,750 s.f. (50 by 95 ft.) • Project density 6.23 dwelling units per net acre (RL permits 7 du/ac) F"rEST • Project required to provide community benefits that exceed minimum improvements required of project itself • Community benefits proposed by applicant include: 1 . Gisler Park improvements 2. $250,000 towards installation of sports field lights on HB City School District property for use by non-profit(s) like AYSO Planning Commission approved a tract map condition which gives the City the right to use the money for another park and recreation community benefit, with priority given to southeast HB, if the money is not applied towards a field lighting project within two years of City Council approval of the project. Gisler Park ' improvements include: �• - • 1 . Replace tot lot and o . o LEGEND construct combined � — ---r play area (play , equipment, benches, planters) ' 2. Replace 3,500 I.f. of . �----- walking path with 10 ft. wide concrete path -- --'"� '� `-; '; C 3. New walking path =r ` sections .` �1 4. Replace trash cans ANALYSIS ■ MND adequate and in compliance with CEQA guidelines • Consistent with General Plan and its goals and policies • Compatible with surrounding area ■ Adds to City's housing stock ■ Complies with HBZSO with exception of reduced residential lot size/width ■ Community benefits provided RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND based on the reasons cited . END E mom( : 4/3a12091 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, October 19, 2021, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 20-001 (KILLARNEY'S ROOFTOP DINING) Applicant: Jeff Bergsma, TEAM Design Property Owner: Gregory Newman Appellant: Councilmember Mike Posey Request: To amend Conditional Use Permit No. 99-021 to permit the conversion of an existing restaurant rooftop to a 1,936 sq. ft. dining area with alcohol sales and service. This request includes participation in the Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for sixteen (16) parking spaces required for the new dining area, and deviation from the Exhibit B Standard Conditions of City Council Resolution No. 2017-42 regarding hours of operation. The Planning Commission held a public hearing of EPA No. 20-001 on August 10, 2021, and conditionally approved the request. Location: 209 Main Street, 92648 (West side of Main Street, north of Walnut Avenue) City Contact: Hayden Beckman, Senior Planner ® 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 20-002, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 20-002, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 20-002 (GISLER RESIDENTIAL) Applicant: Derek Spalding, Brookfield Residential Request: GPA — To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RL). ZMA — To amend the zoning designation from Public-Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density. MND — To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these applications on September 28, 2021 , and recommended approval to the City Council. Location: 21141 Strathmoor Lane, 92646 (west side, south of Bluefield Drive) City Contact: Ricky Ramos 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No. 2 is covered by Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, approved by the Planing Commission on September 28, 2021. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office or on line at hftp://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov on Thursday, October 14, 2021. C:\Users\mooretaWppData\LocanMicrosoR\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\86MUPSXB\101921 combined.doc ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Robin Estanislau, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ C:\Users\mo reta\AppDatalLocalVvlicrosoft\Windows INetCache\Content.Outlook\86MUPSXBN01921 combined.doc Moore, Tania From: Christine Gonzalez <cgonzales@scng.com> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2021 3:22 PM To: Moore, Tania Subject: Re: PH Notice - Killarney's Rooftop Dining & Gisler Residential Attachments: 11492429.pdf Cost $408.00, pub HB Wave 1 OfT The Smudge marks in the pdf will be bullet points in print. 1 . ANNEAL OF THE NLANNINGCOMMISSION'SAI OF EN 1 11 LEMEN 1 PLAN AMENDMEN 1 N (KILLARNEY'S ROOF 1 OP DINING) APP11� Bergsma, TEAM Design PEOPertv Owner: Gregor Appellant: Councilmember Mike Posey Request: Conditional Use Permit No. 99-021 to permit the conve existing restaurant rooftop to a 1,936 sq. ft. dining area \ sales and service. This request includes particjpat Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for sixteen ( spaces required for the new dining area, and deviatic Exhibit B Standard Conditions of City Council Resolutior regarding hours of operation. The Planning Commis! public hearing of EPA No. 20-001 on August 10, conditjonally approved the request. Location: 209 Main "I (West side of Main Street, north of Walnut Averue) Ci Hayden Beckman, Senior Planner 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMEN I NO. 20-002. LON AMENDMEN I NO. 20-002, MI 1 IGAI ED N VLCLARAIION NO, 20-002 (GISLER RESIT Applicant : Derek Spalding, Brookfield Residential Rea - To amend the land use designation from Public (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Resi Density (RL). LNA - To amend the zoning de�1�ggn��a��tion f m Seipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density. MNQ - To potential environmental impacts of the proposed pn Planning Commission held a public hearing on these apr- OC Register Legal Advertising Chrissy Gonzalez 1771 S. Lewis St. Anaheim, CA 92805 714-796-6736 M-F 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Lunch 12 Noon to 1:00 p.m. Closed Sat. and Sun. i On Thu. Sep 30. 2021 at 11:56 AM Moore. Tania <Tania.Moore�isurtcitc-hb.orx> wrote: Hi Chrissy, Please publish the attached PH Notice in The Wave, on October 7, 2021. Thank you. Tania Moore Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office 714-536-5209 tama.moore(d)surfcity-hb org 2 BE HE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, October 19, MI, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a Public hearing on the following planning and zoning items'. '.1. : Jeff Bergsma. TEAM Design Uhsirldri Gregory Newman Asfaeliant: Councilmentr Mike Posey XBRUAW-L To amend Conditional Use Permit No. 99021 to Permit the conversion of an exisfing restaurant roof oo too 1,936 m. ft. dining area with alcohol sales and service. This request includes Participation in the Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for sixteen (16) Parking spaces required for the new dining area, and deviation from the Exhibit B Standard Conditions of City Council Resolution No.2017-42 regarding tours of operation. The Planning Commission held a Public hearing of EPA No. 20-001 on August 10. 2021, and conditionally approved the request. Location: 209 Main Street 92648 (West side of Main Street, north of Walnut Avenue) City Carl Hayden Beckman,Senior Planner 2. ZONW1.9 MAP Derek Spalding,Brookfield Residential MAQUill"FA - To amend the land use designation from Public Semipublic (underlying Rest ntiol Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RLI.SAGA-To amend the zoning de l�yrtgtlon from Public- Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density.AAAIp-To analyze the Potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Prefect. The Planning Commission held a Public hearing on these applications on P}ember 28.2021, and recommended approval to the City Council. 2114]� Sirpnihmpopor Lane, 92646 (west side, south of Blue eld DrivelSlIYSpptpLt: Ricky Ramps 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item e1 is categorically exem. pt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, 2. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No.2 is covered by Miti paled Negative Declaration No. 20-M, approved by the Planing Commission on September 28,2021. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for Public inspection and comment by conacting the Community Development Deportment or by telephoning (714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the Proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested Parties at the City Clerk's Office or on tine at httm)/www_huntinatnttbeachca.gov on Thursday,October 14,2021, ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues You or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or Prior to, the Public hearing. If there are any further questions Plecl call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above Items. Direct Your written communications to the City Clerk Robin Estanislou,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach.California 92640 .. 714-536-5nalonbeachen 277,__ . .. _ ommentst Published Huntington Beach Wove OCt.7,2021 11492429 PROOF OF SERVICE OF PAPERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I am employed In the County of Orange. State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action: my business address Is 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach. CA 92648 Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1094 6. on October 5, 2021. 1 served the foregoing documents described as General Plan Amendment No 20-002. Zoning Map Amendment No 20-002. Mitigated Negative Declaration No 20-002 (Gisler Residential) on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows 983 Addresses — see label list a [X] BY MAIL -- I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Huntington Beach, California I am readily familiar" with the firm practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing It is deposited with U S Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of a party served. service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing In the affidavit b [ j BY MAIL -- By depositing a true copy thereof In a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at Huntington Beach. California. addressed to the address shown above c [ J BY DELIVERY BY HAND to the office of the addressee d [ j BY PERSONAL DELIVERY to the person(s) named above e [ j BY FAX TRANSMISSION to No I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 5, 2021, at Huntington Beach. California. Deputy ' Clerk g RollowupAetters/proof of mailing doc Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avery.com/terriplates :1 Map#1,3,334,485 APN#149-081-13,149- Map#2,54, Map 1114 APNs I 149-291-28 149-091 10,149-082.51. 149 083-43,145-084-51, 143 149-082-01 095-19,149-095-20,149-086-66,149-096-69.149-097.67 NO DATA ILE G1SL..Hf�, VILLA PACIFIC COMMUNITY ASSN CARY BARBARAN �cLp 9933 VILLA PACIFIC OR 9686 BLUEREEF DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7567 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7504 Map IF 5 APN# Map#6 APN# Map#6 APN# �+ 149-082-02 149-082-03 149-082-03 V` TODD KENNETH REYNOLDS PAMELA D RESIDENT 8 9692 BLUEREEF DR 21441 CORALITA 9696 BLUEREEF DR p HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7504 LAKE FOREST, CA 92630-8201 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 ...-� N Map 1117 APN# Map#8 APN# Map 1119 APN# 149-082-04 149-082-05 149-082-06 CERECEDES MARGRET KIANI MAHI D BRADBU BY NICOLE 9702 BLUEREEF DR 9706 BLUEREEF DR 9712 BLUEREEF DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7SO6 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7506 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7506 V Map IT 10 APN# Map#10 APN# Map It 11 APN# 149-082-07 149-082-07 149-082-08 w,J PARTNOFF WILLIAM V RESIDENT MANZO MANUEL 3321 ALABAMA CIR 9732 BLUEREEF DR 34960 STAGE RD COSTA MESA, CA 92626-2041 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 TEMECULA, CA 92592-8029 Map#11 APN# Map#12 APN# Map#12 APN# + 149-082-08 149-082-09 149-082-09 RESIDENT RESIDENT SWARD JEFFREY 9736 BLUEREEF DR 9742 BLUEREEF DR PO BOX 7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON REACH, CA 92615-7019 Map Al 13 APN# Map# 14 APN# Map If 15 APN# 149-082-10 149-082-11 149-082-12 REYES FRANK FAIN ROGER RESIDENT 9746 BLUEREEF DR 9752 BLUEREEF DR 9752 MONTE CARLO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7563 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7563 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map If 15, 76,460 APN# Map# 16 APN# Map#16 APN# 149-08 - 149-083-22, 149-291-03 149-082-13 149-082-13 BRU CKMANN R FLEMING JOAN ELIZABETH RESIDENT ^ 617 AVENIDA ACAP 19931 POTOMAC UN 9746 MONTE CARLO CIR SAN CLEMENTE, CA 9267 404 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-3521 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 (/I Map If 17 APN# Map#18 APN# Map#18 APN# 149-082-14 149-082-15 149-082-15 J� GOMEZ SALVADOR CRANE R MARCINE ELVIN RESIDENT 9742 MONTE CARLO CIR 36784 ORAKEN WAY 9736 MONTE CARLO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7519 LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92532-30" HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#19 APN# Map IF 20 APN# Map If 20 APN# 149-082.16 149-082-17 149-082-17 LEONE MARK P DEATS DOUGLAS M RESIDENT 9732 MONTE CARLO CIR 21902 VACATION UN 9726 MONTE CARLO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7519 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 8242 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#21 APN# Map#21 APN# Map#22 APN# 149-082-18 149-082-18 149-082-19 LOVE L LEE RESIDENT HAAS TODD A 419 MAIN ST#73 9712 MONTE CARLO CIR 9706 MONTE CARLO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-5199 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7519 Easy Peet Acidrc%s Labels . . avery.cor,' ,plates Map#23 APN# Padp a ;: a,r.p Map#2S APN# 149-082-20 149-082-21 149082-22 ROSS GREGORY A BARNES BRANTON B MAX NELL COLLEEN D 9702 MONTE CARLO CIR 9696 MONTE CARLO CIR 9692 MONTE CARLO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7519 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7519 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7519 Map If 26 APN# Map#27 APN# Map It 27 APN# 149-082-23 149-082-24 149-082.24 ATHERTON STEVEN R1 SSELL CICH BRIAN PETER RESIDENT 9686 MONTE CARLO CIR 21871 VACATION LN 9691 PORT ROYAL CIR ((�� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7519 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-8239 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7520 N Map#28 APN# Map#29 APN# Map#30 APN# 149-082-25 149-082-26 149-082-27 DAYYAT LINDA M GRAHAM FRIEDA EKSLOM JONAS 9695 PORT ROYAL CIR 9701 PORT ROYAL CIR 20191 CAPE CORAL LN APT 309 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-8516 Map#30 APN# Map#31 APN# Map#31 APN# 149-082-27 149-082-28 149-082-28 RESIDENT TORRE DE SPENCER NORMA RESIDENT 9705 PORT ROYAL CIR 20802 WOODLEA LN 9711 PORT ROYAL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6422 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#32 APN# Map#33 APN# Map#33, 192 APN# 149-082-29 149-082-30 149-082.30,149-086-65 CHESTNUT JAMES SCOTT RESIDENT TIERNEY PATRICK 9715 PORT ROYAL CIR 9725 PORT ROYAL CIR 21331 YARMOUTH LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7057 Map#34 APN# Map#35 APN# Map#36 APN# 149-082-31 149-082-32 149 082-33 7 SHODA TOSHIRO R GUINEY CATHLEEN M SNYDER SALLY BETH [O� 9731 PORT ROYAL CIR 9735 PORT ROYAL CIR 9741 PORT ROYAL CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 Map#37 APN# Map#38 APN# Map If 39 APN# 149-082-34 149-082-35 149- 36 CATANZARO MICHAEL JOHN BREWER MARK SALINAS GE 9745 PORT ROYAL CIR 9751 PORT ROYAL CIR 9751 VILLA PA IC DR ^ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7520 HUNTINGTON BEA , CA 92646-7570 (�, Map#40 APN# Map#41 APN# Map 11141 APN# 149- 37 149-082-38 149-082-38 ARMO - U DR L TSANG MELINDA WAI TING RESIDENT Jp 9745 VILLA PAC R 2790 KELVIN AVE APT 1313 9741 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92646-7570 IRVINE, CA 92614-5862 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 (� Map#42 APN# Map#42 APN# Map#43 APN# �.. 149-082-39 149-082-39 149-082-40 RESIDENT CORR IGAN CHRISTOPHER 1 NEIGHBORS DOUGLAS 9735 VILLA PACIFIC DR PO BOX 493281 9731 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 REDDING, CA 96049-3281 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7570 Map#44 APN# Map 11145 APN# Map#46 APN# 149-082 41 149-082-42 149-082-43 NUNEZ NICHOLAS ANTONIO LUNDQUIST DANIEL MOSCARITOLO JOSEPH P 9711 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9705 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9701 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7531 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7531 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 1)1616 7531 . . .. .... r--1 I Easy Peel Address Labels Go to aveMcom/templates Map#47 APN# Map a 47, 108,355 APN4 Map#48 APN# 149-082-44 149-082-44, 149-084-12, 149-271 12 149-082-45 RESIDENT NEWMAN JERRY W GOLEMBESK I DONNA 9695 VILLA PACIFIC DR 21001 HAGE16TOWN CIR 9691 VILLA PACIFIC OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7531 Tv V Map#49 APN# Map#50 APN# Map# 51 APN# 149-082-46 149-082-47 149-082-48 LORENZO DAVID WAYNE PEARSON DARIN M JOSENHANS ROBERT 1 JR TR 21352 VIA STRAITS LN 21346 VIA STRAITS LN 2085 ROBIN RD 8 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7529 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7529 SAN MARINO, CA 91108-2831 Map#S1 APN# Map#52 APN# Map#53 APN# 14 82-48 149-082-49 149-082-50 RESIDE BACU FIN JEFFREY ADAM JONES JAMES JOSEPH 21342 VIA S TS LN 21336 VIA STRAITS LN 2004 CALVERT AVE HUNTINGTON BE CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7529 COSTA MESA, CA 92626-3520 J Map#53 APN# Map It 54 APN# Map#55 APN# 149-082-50 149-083-01 149-083-02 RESIDENT SAVAGE STEVEN D MELANSON ALISON 21332 VIA STRAITS LN 9802 BLUEREEF DR 9806 BLUEREEF DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7508 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7508 Map#56 APN# Map IT 57 APN# Map#SS APN# 149-083-03 149-083-04 149-083-05 } YOUNG ROBERT T HYAMS LISA M OATES R J 9812 BLUEREEF DR 9816 BLUEREEF DR 21861 OCEANBREEZE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7508 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7508 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-8256 Map#58 APN# Map#59 APN# Map#60 APN# 149-083-05 149-083-06 149083-07 RESIDENT YANG U RSULA BIRGITTA BOYES JOSEPH H 9822 BLUEREEF DR 9826 CORAL COVE CIR 9822 CORAL COVE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7503 Q� Map#61 APN# Map 0161 APN# Map IN 62 APN# 7 149-083-08 149-083-08 149-083-09 HARW ICK CLINT GREGORY TR RESIDENT LITTLE BRENT A 5223 LIDO SANDS DR 9816 CORAL COVE CIR 9812 CORAL COVE CIR (1 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-2202 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7503 `I Map#63 APN# Map#63 APN# Map#64 APN# 149-083-10 149-083-10 149-083- JONON DIANE RESIDENT BAUMAN lE R ALLISON p 19260 S HEDGE LN 9806 CORAL COVE CIR 2030R KANAWHA W ,\ %l SPRING HILL, KS 66083-8857 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 CHARLESTON, W �53 Map#65 APN# Map#66 APN# Map#67 APN# 149-083-11 149-083-12 149-083- /� RESIDENT HANSON PAUL REGAN ROKA EETHEL FRADEJAS 9802 CORAL COVE CIR 9801 JAMAICA CIR 9805 JAMAICA CI HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7518 HUNTINGTON BEACH, 92646-7518 Map#68 APN# Map#69 APN# Map 0 70 APN# 149-083-14 149-0 -15 149-083-16 KUO OLIVER THORPE L F � RICE LOUIS C 9811 JAMAICA CIR 9815 JAMAIFt, 319 9TH ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7518 HUNTINGTON R CA 4'646 7519 HUNTINGTON BEAC I'. CA 92648-4634 AVERY .• Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avery.com/templates Map If 70 APN# 71, 133 APN# Map#72 APN# 149-083-16 149-083-17, 149-084-39 149-083-18 RESIDENT SULLIVAN JOANNE WANCHEK KATHLEEN YYY 9821 JAMAICA CIR 9825 JAMAICA CIR 9821 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7518 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7535 Map#73 APN# Map If 73 APN# Map#74 APN# 149-083-19 149-083-19 149-083-20 BOWEN MICHELE L RESIDENT BARTLETT DOUGLAS MICHAEL R 21501NNES CIR 9815 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9811 VILLA PACIFIC DR S+XJ ANCHORAGE, AK 99515-4113 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7535 Map If 75 APN# Map#76 APN# Map#77 APN# p 149-083-21 149-083-22 149-083-23 ANDERSON BRITTNEY RESIDENT SILCOCK LAMES J 9805 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9801 VILLA PACIFIC DR 21336 BAY CREST CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7535 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7502 Q Map If 78 APN# Map#79 APN# Map 4 80 APN# v 149-083-24 149-083-25 149-083-26 _93 WATT THOMAS W ELITZAK JACK M BOWMAN DENNIS J 21342 BAY CREST CIR 21346 BAY CREST CIR 1430 WAGNER DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7502 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7502 LAKE HAVASU CITY, AZ 86404-2462 Map#80 APN# Map#81 APN# Map a 81 APN# 149-083-26 149-083-27 149-083-27 RESIDENT COW GIAN BEVERLY RESIDENT CkS{ 21352 BAY CREST CIR 10196 SU NN AVE 21351 BAY CREST CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92 708-10 18 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 cy, Map#82 APN# Map#83 APN# Map#84 APN# LvLv! 149-083-28 149-083-29 149-083-30 KAPLAN WAYNE J BAEHR DOROTHY J MCCOU RF MICHAEL PATRICK 21345 BAY CREST CIR 21341 BAY CREST CIR 21335 BAY CREST CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7502 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7502 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7502 I Map#85 APN# Map It 85 APN# Map 9 86 APN# ~_ 149-083-31 149-083-31 149-083-32 RESIDENT CHATMAN GERALD W III HUNTER INA M 21315 SEASPRITE CIR PO BOX 8456 21311 SEASPRITE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615-8456 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7521 Map#87 APN# Map It 88 APN# Map#89 APN# 149-083-33 149-083-34 149-083-35 ALLEN THOMAS PEARSON SU SAN THE ADRIENNE BECKER TRU ST :j- 21305 SEASPRITE CIR 21301 SEASPRITE CIR 21295 SEASPRITE CIR#6 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7521 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7521 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7521 Map#90 APN# Map#91,93 APNM Map#92 APN# 149-083-36 149-083-37,39 149-083-38 RATLEDGE EDWIN ALFRED BRILHART DARREN SELBY WESLEY R 21291 SEASPRITE CIR 21292 SEASPRITE CIR 21296 SEASPRITE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7521 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7521 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7521 Map#94 APN# Map#95 APN# Map#95 APN# 149-083-40 149-083-41 149-083-41 CLAW ROBIN ANNE RESIDENT SHUM DONALD K 21306 SEASPRITE CIR 21312 SEASPRITE CIR 8902 F ENTON DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7521 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9;r,1r HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 9,64E 5134 I asy Peel Address Labels Map N 96 APN# Map p 96 APNK Map M 97 APNJI 149-083-42 149-083-42 149-094-01 DRECHSLER FRANK J RESIDENT RESIDENT 17620 OAK ST 21316 SEASPRITE CIR 21282 WAVECREST CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-4552 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map I197 APN# Map N 98 APN# Map p 99 APN# Q 149-094-01 149-084-02 149-094-03 KRU MBACH GUENTER F EVANS LEON S ROGERS MELODYE A 3307 75TH AVE NW 21286 WAVECREST CIR 21292 WAVECREST CIR 51.1 GIG HARBOR, WA 98335-6416 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7538 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7538 Map IJ 100 APN# Map 11100 APN# Map 4 101 APNO 149-084-04 149-084-04 149-084-05 RESIDENT SMUTS,LOU If NS JOHANNES LEVSEN EDWARD 21296 WAVECREST CIR PO BOX 606 DUNCRAIG WESTERN 21302 WAVECREST CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 AU STRALIA, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7538 Map p 102 APNII Map 4 102 APN# Map p 103 APN# 149-094-06 149-084-06 149-084-07 BROWN STEPHEN W RESIDENT WINTER NICOLAAS D M 20331 BANCR0FT CIR 21306 WAVECREST CIR 21316 WAVECREST CIR 5 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-4735 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7516 -�— Map p 104 APN# Map 0 104 APNN Map a 105 APN# 149-08408 149-084-08 149-084.09 ALAI C RESIDENT PARR ISH JOHN J 1915 AYON CIR 21322 WAVECREST CIR 21326 WAVECREST CIR COSTA MESA, CA 92626.3511 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7516 Til Map#106 APN# Map JI 107 APN# Map a 108 APN4 149-084-10 149 094-11 149-084-12 VAT DAW ON MARGARET OBENAUER KAILYN RESIDENT 21332 WAVECREST CIR 1133 BERKSHIRE LN 21342 WAVECREST CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7516 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-5602 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 1 Map p 109 APN# Map 4 109 APN# Map JJ 110 APNtt f'1 149-084-15 149-084-15 149-084-16 Y_ DEVINNEY DONALD G RESIDENT VILLA PACIFIC 9885 LLC U 19102 COLCHESTER LN 9891 VILLA PACIFIC DR 436 POLI ST APT 401 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-2007 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 VENTU RA, CA 93001-5684 Map p 110 APN# Map a 111 APN4 Map 4 112 APN# 149-084-16 149-084-17 149-084-18 RESIDENT MATU FIND STEVEN YAN HUI 9885 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9881 VILLA PACIFIC DR 21342 GREENSPRAY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7567 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7560 Map JI 113 APN# Map 4 114 APN# Map 4 114 APN# 149-094-19 149-084-20 149-084-20 OLAVARR IA NICOLAS M WANG HAIOU RESIDENT 21336 GREENSPRAY LN 10666 EL ESTE AVE 21332 GREENSPRAY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7560 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-6010 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map 11 115 APN# Map p 116 APN# Map#117 APN# 149-094-21 149-084-22 149-094-23 VANAGS MICHAEL FULLER MALAH NETTO ANASTASIA DAWN 21326 GREENSPRAY LN 21322 GREENSPRAY LN 21316 GREENSPRAY LN HUNTINGTON RFACH, CA 92646-7560 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7960 HUNTINGTON RFACH, CA 92646 7560 Map N 118 APNN Ma N 118 APNN Map N 119 APN# Z; 149-084-24 149 -24 p 149-084-25 RESIDENT CRESS BO L \ RESIDENT 21302 GREENSPRAY LN 2520 GARLAN 21296 GREENSPRAY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 LAKEWOOD, CO 215-1647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 M N 119, 152 160 APNN Map N 120 APNN Map N 121 A PNN 5 490860 I,149-0 3, 149-086-11 149-084-26 149-084-27 SNIDER KE CORADO Al LID WHITE JOSEPHIN E M BO81Al PDX 24 21292 GREENSPRAY LN 21286 GREENSPRAY LN NEWPORT BEACH, 92658-8124 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7514 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7514 Map N 122 APNN Map N 123 APNN Map N 124 APNN 149-084-28 149-084-29 149-084-30 TAYLOR KIMBERLY R LUNDBERG ST CLAIRE LAU RE GRAY DINA LYNN ]� 21282 GREENSPRAY LN 9862 BLUEREEF DR 9806 VERDE MAR DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7514 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7562 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7528 Map N 124 APNN Map N 125 APNN Map N 126 APNN 149-084-30 149-084-31 149-084-32 ^ RESIDENT LOSHAK CON SU ELO M SANCHEZ VINCENT C 1v1 9856 BLUEREEF DR 9852 BLUEREEF DR 9846 BLUEREEF DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7562 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7562 Map N 127 APNN Map N 127 APNN Map N 128 APNN 149-094-33 149-084-33 149-084-34 KVINGE MARGARET RESIDENT DETTWILER GREGORY 1315 SANTANELLA TER 9842 BLUEREEF DR 9836 CORAL COVE CIR CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625-1742 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7503 Map N 129 APNN Map N 130 APNN Map N 131 APNN 149-084-35 149-084-36 149-084-37 SAIGER RICHARD B TUANO MELISSA ARDON BOLEN MICHAEL K 9842 CORAL COVE CIR 9846 CORAL COVE CIR 9852 CORAL COVE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7503 Map N 132 APNN Map N 132,699 APNN Map N 133 APNN YJ 149-084-38 149-084-38, 149-403-28 149-084-39 I RESIDENT RABBATH RICHARD Y RESIDENT 4^^ 9856 CORAL COVE CIR 21211 FERN CIR 9862 CORAL COVE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 �A l� Map#134 APN#149-094-40 Map#135 APN# Map# 136 APN# PHILLIPS NABIL 149-094-41 149-094-42 -r) 9861 JAMAICA CIR SARGEANT HEIDI L BOWES MITCHELL G HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7518 9855 JAMAICA CIR 9851 JAMAICA CIR y- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7518 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7518 (OTC/♦ Map#137 APN# Map#138 APN# Map#139 APN# (� 149-094-43 149 084-44 149-084-45 RAMBO MI HYUN NAGLE LLOYD W DIFRANCESCO ROBERT A 9845 JAMAICA CIR 9841 JAMAICA CIR 9835 JAMAICA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7518 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7518 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7518 N Map#140 APN# Map#141 APN# Map# 142 APN# 149-094-46 149-084 47 149-084-48 RU DOLPH SU SAN E ELLSON MORGAN P LEE DALLAS B 9941 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9845 VILLA PACIFIC DR 1501 ROBIN WAY HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7568 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7568 FULLERTON, CA 92835-3712 Map# 142 APN# Map# 143 APN# Map#144 APN# 149-084-48 149-084-49 149.084-50 RESIDENT KUNZE STEPHANIE L LAVA STUART JEFFREY _ 9851 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9855 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9861 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7568 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7568 Map#14S APN# Map# 146 APN# Map# 147 APN# 149-085-13 149-085-14 149-085-15 PECK DAVID S FAULK WILBU RCLAYTON GALLUCCIO FRED JAMES 9922 BARR ANCA CIR 9921 BARR ANCA CIR 2227 HEATHER LN _1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7501 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7525 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-3405 Cy(lS/ Map#147 APN# Map#148 APN# Map# 150 APN# y 149-085-15 149-085-16 149-086-01 (U� RESIDENT ALVES JASON UTTLE PETER D 9925 BARRANCA CIR 9931 BARR ANCA CIR 21371 GREEN COVE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7525 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7512R� Map#151 APN# Map#151 APN# Map#152 APN# 149-086-02 149.086-02 149-086-03 1 RESIDENT DEVORE DANA RESIDENT 21375 GREEN COVE CIR 9460 GULL CIR 21381 GREEN COVE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92 708-574 7 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map It 153 APN# Map Of 153 APN# Map# 154 APN# 149-086-04 149-086-04 149-086-05 RESIDENT STEINER MARK S TR TROPICAL TR RESIDENT 21385 GREEN COVE CIR 8681 FRANCISCAN CIR 21391 GREEN COVE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-2214 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#154 APN# Map#155 APN# Map#155 APN# 149 086 05 149-086-06 149-086-06 CARRICK JAMES PETITPREN PAULA RESIDENT 9372 PIER OR 5527 MEW EL RD 9746 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7208 DEXTER, MI 48130-9652 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#156 APN# Map# 157 APN# Map# 158 APN# 149-086-07 149-086-08 149-086-09 THE DOWELL FAMILY TRUST ROCK 5U SAN MIGUEL THERESA RENEE 9742 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9736 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9732 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON HFACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7572 11 Easy Peel Address Labels AVERY .0 Map#159 APN$I •1„p#160 APN# Map#161 APN# 149-086-10 149-086-11 149-086-12 GIACONI GARY RAYMOND RESIDENT TU FNER RADLEY 9712 VILLA PACIFIC OR 9706 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9702 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7532 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7532 Map#162 APN# Map#163 APN# Map# 164 APN# 149-086-13 149-086-14 149-086-15 BOHRER RISA BASHORE BRYON RICHARD AXELSON BRADLEY ADAM 9696 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9692 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9692 BROOKHAVEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7532 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7532 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 Map#165 APN# Map# 166 APN# Map# 167 APN# N 149-086-16 149-086-17 149-086-18 3 VLASEK KAY DIFRANCESCO SCOTT VINCENT BAS PETER �y 9696 BROOKHAVEN CIR 9702 BROOKHAVEN CIR 3370 TARECO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 LOS ANGELES, CA 90068.1528 Map#167 APN# Map#168 APN# Map# 168 APN# 149-086-18 149-086-19 149-086-19 RESIDENT GANGL ALFRED H TR RESIDENT ^ 9706 BROOKHAVEN CIR 30720 229TH PL SE 9712 BROOKHAVEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 BLACK DIAMOND, WA 98010-1295 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map# 169 APN# Map#170 APN# Map# 171 APN# 149-086-20 149-086-21 149-086-22 VAN SIBO GRIFFITH CHARLES W HORROCKS NANCY C 9726 BROOKHAVEN CIR 9732 BROOKHAVEN CIR 9736 BROOKHAVEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 Map# 172 APN# Map If 173 APN# Map# 174 APN# 149-086-23 149-086-24 149-086-25 TETLEY DONALD S CUNNINGHAM KATHLEEN SU LLIVAN PATRICIA A 9742 BROOKHAVEN CIR 9746 BROOKHAVEN CIR 9751 BROOKBAY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7510 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7509 Map# 175 APN# Map#176 APN# Map#177 APN# 149-086-26 149-086-27 149-086-28 MALETIC LORI D LOFTU SCAROLINE STROTHER WANG SHEN 9745 BROOKBAY CIR 9741 BROOKBAY CIR 9735 BROOKBAY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7509 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7509 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7509 Map# 178 APN# Map# 179 APN# Map I7 180 APN# t7 149-086-29 149-086-30 149-086-31 CARR ASCO CARMELA HEIDEMAN LILLIAN A DUGGAN DANIEL PAUL 9731 BROOKBAY CIR 9715 BROOKBAY CIR 23991 DORY DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7509 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7509 LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677-4238 Map# 180 APN# Map# 181 APN# Map# 181 APN# U 149-086-31 149-086 32 149-086-32 RESIDENT BECHMAX LLC RESIDENT 9711 BROOKBAY CIR 13441 BEACH ST 9705 BROOKBAY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 CERRITOS, CA 90703-1422 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 f Map# 182 APN# Map# 183 APN# Map# 184 APN# 149-086-33 149-086-34 149-086-35 JOHNSON IRW IN DREVICK BEVERLY I FLORIAN LUIS O TR 9701 BROOKBAY CIR 9695 BROOKBAY CIR 67 CALLE DE ORO HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7500 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7509 RANCHO MIRAGE. CA 92270-5615 Map N 184 APNN Map N 185 APNN Map N 186 APNN 149-086-35 149-086-58 149-086-59 RESIDENT GREGORIU SWILLIAM FRITSCH LEAH A 9691 BROOKBAY CIR 21432 VIA STRAITS LN 21426 VIA STRAITS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7530 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7530 Map N 187 APNN Map N 188 APNN Map It 189 APNN 149-086-60 149-086-61 149-086-62 HOOKER BENJAMIN 1 NOTEBOOM KAREN PAPPAS TERRY A 21422 VIA STRAITS LN 21392 VIA STRAITS LN 21386 VIA STRAITS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7530 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7575 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7575 w1 7 Map N 190 APNN Map N 191 APNN Map N 191 APNN 149-086-63 149-086-64 149-086-64 LEENEN RONA M RESIDENT MEGORDEN MARIANNE E 21382 VIA STRAITS LN 21376 VIA STRAITS LN 5725 PARK CREST DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7575 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 LA VERNE, CA 91750-1711 Map N 192 APNN Map N 194 APNN Map N 195 APNN 149-086-65 149-087-01 149-087-02 RESIDENT LOTILLA BRIDGETTE LU IOWICZ MARK ALAN 21372 VIA STRAITS LN 9862 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9856 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7571 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7571 Map N 196 APNN Map N 197 APNN Map N 198 APNN 149-087-03 149-087 04 149-087-05 LITZ MERLE LOCKMAN IANET D TR WILSON RICHARD ALLEN 9852 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9846 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9842 VILLA PACIFIC DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7571 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7571 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7571 Map N 199 APNN Map N 199 APNN Map N 200 APNN 149-087-06 149-087-06 149-087-07 SMITH LE SHIA RESIDENT RESIDENT 2525 56TH AVE SW 9822 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9816 VILLA PACIFIC DR Q0 SEATTLE, WA 98116-2219 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 0 Map N 200,201 APNN Map N 202 APNN Map N 203 APNN 149-087-07,08 149-087-09 149-087-10 NATHENSON DAVID ROY DUNBAR MARK RIOS RICHARD A ^ 9812 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9806 VILLA PACIFIC DR 9802 VILLA PACIFIC DR (�> HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7536 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7536 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7536 (/1 Map N 204 APNN Map N 205 APNN Map N 206 APNN 149-087-11 149-087d2 149-087-13 SHEPPARD JAMESE DANGELO ERNANI JOHN GANN MATTHEW E 9802 HARBOR POINT CIR 9806 HARBOR POINT CIR 9812 HARBOR POINT CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7517 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7517 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7517 Map N 207 APNN Ma N 207 APNN Map N 208 ARNN 149-087-14 149-0 4 p 149-067-15 GIBSON TEDD CRAIG RESIDENT GALLOWAY LISA L 11404 CORIENDER AVE 9816 HARBOR P T CIR 9822 HARBOR POINT CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-2417 HUNTINGTON BEAC CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7517 Map 4 209 APNN Map N 210 APNN Map N 211 ARNN 149-087-62 149-087-63 149-087-64 RICHARDS SANDRA R BABBITT KEVIN GROMAK CAROLE J 21392 GREEN COVE CIR 21386 GREEN COVE CIR 21382 GREEN COVE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7512 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7512 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7517 a Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avery.com/templates Map#212 APN# Map#213 APN# 149-087.65 149-087-66 149-121 Ul BROCCOLO RICHARD J POWELL CHARLES SCHUMANN BRADLEY W 21376 GREEN COVE CIR 21372 GREEN COVE CIR 21211 RICHMOND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7512 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7512 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7319 Ti Map #216 APN# Map#217 APN# Map It 218 APN# 149-121-02 149-121-03 149-121-04 PANG EDMUND KAMEKONA CROWTHER TERRY L HARW IC KYLE G 21201 RICHMOND CIR 21191 RICHMOND CIR 21171 RICHMOND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7319 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 _ Map#219 APN# Map#220 APN# Map#221 APN# 149-121-05 149-121-06 149-121-07 DWORAK VICTOR CORSET CLIFFORD P WILSON LAMES G JR TR J G&M L 21161 RICHMOND CIR 21151 RICHMOND CIR 21141 RICHMOND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 Map#222 APN# Map#223 APN# Map#224 APN# 149-121-08 149-121-09 149-121-10 ^ OEVIEW THOMAS HAMLIN ABELL-DENT BONNIE K TR MC CLOSK EY JAMES (vp 21131 RICHMOND CIR 21121 RICHMOND CIR 21111 RICHMOND CIR " HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7318 f' Map#225 APN# Map#226 APN# Map#226 APN# 149-121-11 149- -12 149-121-12 4- ZOMBEK MARK S TUCKFIEL LPH L 'R\ RESIDENT 21122 RICHMOND CIR 1344 E FOX ; N 21132 RICHMOND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7331 HOLLADAY, UT .1 -5577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Jd Map#227 APN# Map#228 APN# Map#228 APN# (� 149-121-13 149-121-14 149-121-14 FRIAS EDGAR FAIRFAX RONALD E RESIDENT , 21142 RICHMOND CIR 102 COCHISE DR 21152 RICHMOND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7331 HAILEY, ID 83333-8491 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#229 APN# Map If 229 APN# Map If 230 APN# 149-121-15 149-121-15 149-121-16 SIZLO THOMAS J RESIDENT DECKER MARK Q 19251 SU RFVIEW DR 21162 RICHMOND CIR 21172 RICHMOND CIR SY,JT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-5587 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7331 Map#231 APN# Map#232 APN# Map#233 APN# Y i. 149-121-17 149-121-18 149.121-19 (r KANEKO BRIAN BUHLER CODY W DAVIS CHARLES L 21192 RICHMOND CIR 21202 RICHMOND CIR 21212 RICHMOND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7331 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7331 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7331 Map#234 APN# Map#234,349 APN# Map#235 APN# 149 121-20 149-121-20, 149-271-06 149-121-21 n RESIDENT NEALON PETER MICHAEL BARKER GEORGE T Qp` 21211 LOCKHAVEN CIR 735 BALBOA AVE 21201 LOCKHAVEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651AI05 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7320 Map#236 APN# Map#236 APN# Map#237 APN# 149-121-22 149-121-22 149-121.23 WELLER WARREN RESIDENT WALTON MICHAEL 11465 E BELLA VISTA DR 21191 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21171 LOCKHAVEN CIR SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85259-5824 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BFACH rA 97[-1G 7i71 e .• . i.Lip 4 ;ik Al Ng I.,,P a :i'a;o!q;: Map N 240 APNN 149-121 24 149.121-2S 149-121-26 Yy GOLDENBERG CHARLES ISAAC MAOEY RANDALL CLAW RESIDENT 1Y1 21161 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21151 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21141 LOCKHAVEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7321 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7321 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map N 240 APNN Map N 241 APNN Map N 242 APNN q� 149-121-26 149-121-27 149-121-28 b GONZALES JACQ LELINE 1 TR BECKER MATTHEW D SCHOFIELD DAVID C 8871 TRACY AVE 21131 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21121 LOCKHAVEN CIR GARDEN GROVE, CA 92841-1627 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7321 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7321 N Map N 243 APNK Map N 244 APNN Map N 245 APNN 149-121-29 149-121-30 149-121-31 KAPU SVICTORIA M TR SLAVIK PAUL J DOWELL TIMOTHY 21111 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21122 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21132 LOCKHAVEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7321 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7340 HUNTINGTON REACH, CA 92646-7340 Map N 246 APNN Map N 247 APNK Map N 248 APNN 149-121 32 149.121-33 149-121-34 HOTSEY DEBRA ANN STEIN BERNICE H LARSON RICHARD E 21142 LOCKHAVEN CIR 211S2 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21082 WHITE HORSE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7340 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7340 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7051 _ Map N 248 APNN Map N 249 APNN Map N 250 APNN 149-121-34 149-121-35 149-121-36 RESIDENT KROESE JOSHUA JAY WORTHINGTON GARY C 21162 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21172 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21192 LOCKHAVEN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7340 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7340 cl Map N 251 APNN Map N 252 APNN Map N 253 APNN 149.121-37 149-121-38 149-121-39 NICOLAOU MARIA CLEUGH BRIAN LOUIS ROBERT MICHAEL 21202 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21212 LOCKHAVEN CIR 21211 BINGHAMPTON CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7340 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7340 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7317 Map If 254 APNK Mi >4255 APNN Map it 256 APNN (� 149 121 40 149-121- 7y 149-121-42 DITTMAR ALBERT W TR SPENCER CH S E TR /\ YIN LACK CHING SHAN 21201 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21191 BINGHAMP N CIR 21171 BINGHAMPTON CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7317 HUNTINGTON.BEACH, CA 92646-7300 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7300 (A Map N 257 APNN Map N 258 APNN Map N 259 APNN 149-121-43 149-121-44 149-121-45 VONRHEIN GLENN KLUEWER BRETT W LUONG DINH Q LAC 21161 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21151 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21141 BINGHAMPTON CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7300 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7300 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7300 Map N 260 APNN Map N 261 APNK Map N 262 APNN 149-121-46 149-121-47 149-121-48 f� KLEIN ROBIN MC KOWEN-MILLER ROSEMARIE TR DEBACKER THOMAS 21131 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21121 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21111 BINGHAMPTON CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7300 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7300 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7300 Map N 263 APNN Map N 264 APNN Map N 265 APNN 149-121-49 149-121-50 149-121-51 FEARNLEY JOHN PROVOST CHRISTOPHER JOE CORNETT SYW E FANG 21122 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21132 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21142 BINGHAMPTON CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7323 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA a?r,4F, 7v21 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7323 �• - . -. . .• • 9• - .• Map$1 266 APN# Map$1 267 APN# Map p 268 APN# 149-121-52 149-121-53 149-121-54 POHL PHILIP C SMITH JOSEPH WM TR DRAZKOW 9(DAVID V 21152 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21162 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21172 BINGHAMPTON CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7323 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7323 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7323 Map a 269 APN# Map a 270 APN# Map 9 271 APN# 149-121-55 149-121-56 149.121-57 TRU DY D REED REVOCABLE TRU ST RU IZ DENISE N NGU`hN THI THU THU Y (� 21192 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21202 BINGHAMPTON CIR 21212 BINGHAMPTON CIR lXl HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7323 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7323 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7323 Map p 272 APN$1 Map 11 273 APN# Map p 274 APN# ' 149.121-58 149-121-59 149-121-60 GIERHART MICHAEL C HODGMAN STEVEN KARR ER BERT WILLIAM JR TR FAMI y 21211 AMBERW ICK LN 21201 AMBERW ICK LN 21191 AMBERWICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7312 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7312 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 Map p 275 APN# Map 4 276 APN# Map p 277 APN# 149-121-61 149-121-62 149-121-63 VISCO FRANK JOSEPH GESCH GEORGE W Rf AN MICHAEL 21171 AMBERW ICK LN 21161 AMBERW ICK LN 21151 AMBERW ICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 Map p 278 APNp Map li 279 APNp Map tt 280 APNtt 149-121-64 149-121-65 149-121-66 FEHER MICHAELI OCONNELL JOHN HERNANDEZ LADISLADO 7 21141 AMBERW ICK LN 21131 AMBERW ICK LN 21121 AMBERW ICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 Map 11 281 APN# Map a 282 APN# Map p 283 APN# 149-121-67 149-121-68 149-121-69 CHANG BRYAN AKIRA 1EANBLANC ROBERT MC GRAW PATRICE ANN TR 'J- 21111 AMBERW ICK LN 21112 STRATHMOOR LN 21122 STRATHMOOR LN C(/( HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7309 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7336 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7336 fir` V Map p 284,624 APN# Map If 285 APN# Map p 286 APN# 149-121-70, 149-313-44 149-121-71 149-121-72 GOODFELLOW WILLIAM A MELENDEZ JASON T RESIDENT (� 21132 STRATHMOOR LN 21142 STRATHMOOR LN 21152 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7336 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7336 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 (� �I U_ N .3 �� �. acaF Map$$287 APNO Map p 288 APNO (T7 TRACY ES1 149-121-73 149-121-74 5812 LOS C TES OR - ESFEHANI AMER HOSS EIN WHISENAND JOHN CATON PALM SPRINGS, 92264-6004 22 TESORO 21172 STRATHMOOR UN MISSION VIEJO, CA 92692-5140 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7336 Map N 289 APNit Map M 290 APN$I Map 0 291 APN# 149.121 75 149-121-76 149-121-77 SPU IGEON DARR IN S KELLY ALICE F IIJIMA RYO 21192 STRATHMOOR UN 21202 STRATHMOOR LN 21212 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7336 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7337 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7337 Map p 292 APN# Map 4 293 APN# Map p 293 APN# N 149-123-01 149-123-02 149-123-02 3 KIN JOHN DENNIS ARELLANO XAVIER RESIDENT 9792 EFFINGHAM DR 9041 HYDE PAR( DR 9802 EFFINGHAM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7327 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-2301 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 f_ Map p 294 APN# M p 295 APN# Map N 295 APN# 149-123-03 149-1 -04 149-123-04 PEREZ GREGORY 1 SIROCKMA BY RESIDENT 9812 EFFINGHAM DR 7486 RAVEN C 9822 EFFINGHAM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7328 CASTLE PINES, CO 108-9280 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map p 296 APN# Map p 297 APNII Map N 298 APN# 149-123-05 149-123-06 149-123-07 Z' BERGEVIN BRUCE BEUERLEIN MICHAEL A THOMPSON[AN M 9832 EFFINGHAM DR 9842 EFFINGHAM DR 9852 EFFINGHAM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7328 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7328 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7328 U Map K 299 APN# Map tt 299 APN# Map N 300 APN# Lo 149 123-08 149-123 08 149-123 09 NASMAN STEPHEN KENT RESIDENT SOUTH MARGARET K 19671 CRESTKNOLL DR 9862 EFFINGHAM DR 9331 CAPE COD DR YORBA LINDA, CA 92886-6403 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-3503 Map N 300 APN# Map N 301 APN# Map a 302 APN# 149-123-09 149-123-10 149-123-11 RESIDENT MU PRAY PETER GEORGE VENTU R4 LIBERTY 9872 EFFINGHAM DR 9882 EFFINGHAM DR 9892 EFFINGHAM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7328 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7328 Map k 303 APN# Map a 304 APNl1 Map a 305 APNa U 149-123-12 149-123-13 149-123-14 VOORHEES JANET M PU FO JAMESP SAPON MIZRAHIM 9902 EFFINGHAM DR 9912 EFFINGHAM DR 9932 EFFINGHAM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7329 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7329 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7329 A Map 4 306 APN# Map R 3 549, 0 APIN Map 4 308 APN# 1231 , 149-15L26-149-123-15 149- 149-302-23 R UNOLIN PAUL M CITY OF HUNTING EACH NOBLE STEPHEN R 9942 EFFINGHAM DR PO BOX 190 21421 DOCKSIDE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7329 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92 190 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7218 Map p 309 APN# Map 8 310 APN# Map N 311 APN# 149-161-01 149-161-02 149-161-03 SOLORZANO DAVID M BARNES MARGARET JEAN HIGGINBOTHAM STEVE G 21342 BULKHEAD CIR 21332 BULKHEAD CIR 21322 BULKHEAD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-770a HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 01 . sl!jeqe6/e:)-AjaAP Map#312 APN# Map#313 APN# Map#314 APN# 149-161-04 149-161-05 149-161-06 7 FERRINI FRANK NICHOLS KAREN LINDEN CORNELLA FRANK 21312 BULKHEAD CIR 21302 BULKHEAD CIR 21292 BULKHEAD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 Map#315 APN# Map#316 APN# Map It 317 APN# 149.161-07 149-161-08 149-161-09 DUONG PETER HUNTER TIMOTHY B THOMPSON RONALD E R 21272 BULKHEAD CIR 21261 BULKHEAD CIR 21271 BULKHEAD CIR Y�J1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 N Map#318 APN# Map#319 APN# Map#319 APN# 149 161-10 149-161-11 149-1 1 D MARINO CHRISTOPHER 1 HOU KLISA ANN RESIDENT 21291 BULKHEAD CIR 147 N HELM AVE 21301 BULKHE CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 CLOVIS, CA 93612-0165 HUN ANGTON BEA H, CA 92646 Map#320 APN# Map#321 APN# Map#322 APN# 149-161-12 149-161-13 149-161-14 [+5 EVANS JONATHAN MARK NEHRIG JONATHAN R RABBATH PETER RICHARD 21311 BULKHEAD CIR 21321 BULKHEAD CIR 21331 BULKHEAD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 Map# 323 APN# Map#324 APN# Map#325 APN# fi 149-161-15 149-161-16 149-161-17 INGRAHAM JAMES A KOMAR RAYMOND WILLIAM AN ANSON LISA 21341 BULKHEAD CIR 21342 COMPASS LN 21332 COMPASS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7204 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7217 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7217 Map#326 APN# Map#327 APN# Map#328 APN# 149-161-18 149-161-19 149-161-20 BREWER CHARLES REX KIRK ORN JASON F RESIDENT 21322 COMPASS LN 21312 COMPASS LN 21302 COMPASS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7217 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7217 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map It 328 APN# Map#329 APN# Map#330 APN# 149-16120 149-16121 149-161.22 WHEALON PHYLLIS ZAIDEN MELISSA VANDER MEER KASHIWAGI JAY T 5416 RU STIC PINE CT 21292 COMPASS LN 21272 COMPASS LN ORLANDO, FL 32819-7129 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7217 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7217 Map IT 331 APN# Map#332 APN# Map#333 APN# 149-161-23 149-161-24 149-161-25 NAVIDAD APOLINARIO R TR ALTAMIRANO MICHAEL MARNOCHA THOMAS 1 9401 SOUTHSHORE DR 9391 SOUTHSHORE DR 9381 SOUTHSHORE DR V1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7226 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7224 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7224 Map#334 APN# Map#335 APN# Map#336 APN# f 149-161-26 149-162-01 149-162-02 BU SNESS OWNER NOSEL JOHN ROBIN HOGGARD LORIE S 21251 BU SHARD ST 21301 COMPASS LN 21311 COMPASS LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7216 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7216 Map#337 APN# Map#339 APN# Map#339 APN# 149-162-03 149-163-01 149-163-02 RICHERT TRENTON RAY SHEPHERD STEVEN C PORTER DANNY LEE 21321 COMPASS LN 9462 WATERFRONT DR 2020 FREDA LN HUNTINGT^N RF-ICH. CA n.646 ?;'1, HI NTINGTnN RFACH, CA o?Ea5 ??'R CARDIFF BY THE SEA, CA 92007 1419 �• � . .• Map N 339 APNN Map p 340 APNN Map N 341 APNN 149-163-02 149-163-03 149-163-04 RESIDENT WALTERS U LIE A BADGWELL LAU RE J 9452 WATERFRONT DR 9442 WATERFRONT DR 9432 WATERFRONT DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7228 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7228 Map N 342 APNN Map N 343 APNN Map N 344 APNN q� 149-163-13 149-163-14 149-271-01 b BENZ JOHN S HAIR ELL PAUL W ESLEY CHOU WENLING 9451 BREAKWATER CIR 9461 BREAKWATER CIR 10041 THESEU SDR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7203 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7203 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-5452 Map 4 344 APNN Map N 345 APNN Map N 346 APNN 149-271-01 149-271-02 149.271-03 1y RESIDENT PERCIVAL JENNIFER KENT JOHN R 21002 STRATHMOOR LN 21022 STRATHMOOR LN 21032 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7334 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7334 Map N 347 APNN Map ft 348 APNN Map N 349 APNN 149.271 04 149-271-05 149-271-06 BAILEY MARTHA JEAN MU RRELL JAMES W RESIDENT 21042 STRATHMOOR LN 21052 STRATHMOOR LN 21062 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7334 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7334 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 _ Map N 3S0 APNN Map N 351 APNN Map N 351 APNN 149-271-07 149-271-08 149-271-08 PETERSON RICK L RESIDENT MENDOZA YOLO LLC 7 21061 HAGERSTOWN CIR 21051 HAGERSTOWN CIR 2271 ORCHARD OR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-0727 Map N 352 APN# Map N 353 APNN Map N 354 APNN 149-271-09 149.271-10 149-271-11 WIEGMANN ROSEMARY S DEBENON ROSS L TEDDER MATTHEW 7 21041 HAGERSTOWN CIR 21031 HAGERSTOWN CIR 21021 HAGERSTOWN CIR `(J� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 pF, V Map N 356 APNN Map p 356 APNN Map N 357 APNN 149-271-13 149-271 13 149-271-14 RESIDENT WINKLER GARR ETT AHAD PAUL G 21002 HAGERS TOWN CIR 2120 PAIMILLA COU RF 21022 HAGERSTOWN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 COSTA MESA, CA 92627 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 ^ Map N 358 APNN Map p 359 APNN Map N 360 APNN 149-271-15 149-271-16 149-271-17 LEWERENZ WILLIAM STEPHENS TIMOTHY W WHITT JOHN J 21032 HAGERSTOWN CIR 21042 HAGERS TOWN CIR 21052 HAGERSTOWN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 Map N 361 APNN Map N 362 APNN Map N 363 APNN 149-271-18 149-271-19 149-271-20 JONES KEITH G NEVINS CERISSA N BARR ETT MICHAEL J ^ 21062 HAGERSTOWN CIR 21061 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21051 SHACKLEFORD CIR -kN` HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7330 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 Map N 364 APNN Map N 365 APNN Map It 366 APNN 149 271-21 149-271-22 149-271-23 PENNINO MICHAEL D SCOTT JEFFREY CRAIG RENO CHARLES SHERMAN 21041 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21031 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21021 SHACKLEFORD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 � . . %1'1, a ,.!•., .,; Map#368 APN# Map#369 APN# (� 149-271-24 149-271.25 149.271-26 y KATHLEEN ANN WILLS TRU ST MONTGOMERY ERIC 5 HOCKING JAY DEE �7 21001 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21002 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21022 SHACKLEFORD CIR �f HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 (Q� Map#370 APN# Map#371 APN# Map#372 APN# 149-271-27 149-271-28 149-271-29 SORENSEN CHAD STOKES EDWARD ALFRED ELMER CHARBONNEAU NEALA 21032 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21042 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21052 SHACKLE FORD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 Map#373 APN# Map#374 APN# Map It 374 APN# 149-271-30 149-271-31 149-271-31 KASKA BENJAMIN RESIDENT BROCCOLO FRANK R 21062 SHACKLEFORD CIR 21061 BECKWOU RFH CIR 9831 LAPWORTH CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7332 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6541 Map p 375 APN# Map 111376 APN# Map#377 APN# A 149-271-32 149-271-33 149-271-34 2\Y•--•-(�1 CARDULLO JOHN R ROSEN SU ZANNE LOUIS TAFARELLA ERMINIO 21051 BECKWOU RFH CIR 21041 BECKWOU RFH CIR 1206 PARK 5T HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-2731 Map#377 APN# Map#378 APN# Map#379 APN# 149-271-34 149-271-35 149-271-36 RESIDENT SARR IA SAM D JR TR BECK MORRIS A 21031 BECKWOU RFH CIR 21021 BECKWOU RFH CIR 21001 BECKWOU RFH CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 Map#380 APN# Map#380 APN# Map#381 APN# 149-271-37 149-271-37 149.271-38 RESIDENT BARNETT TOMMIE BECKER ROBERT B Q l 21002 BECKWOU RFH CIR 317 PIEDMONT RD 21022 BECKWOU RFH CIR }� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 SANTA BARBARA. CA 93105-1942 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 Map#382 APN# Map If 383 APN# Map#383 APN# 149-271-39 149-271-40 149-271-40 FENNESSY CRAIG JAMES RESIDENT GNEGY BRAD C 21032 BECKWOU RTH CIR 21042 BECKWOU RFH CIR PO BOX 9455 CA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615-8455 T Map#384 APN# Map#385 APN# Map#386 APN# (�� 149-271-41 149-271-42 149-271-43 GALBRAITH JOHN W HAIDLE RICHARD J RASMU ZEN ALAN GEORGE (A 21052 BECKWOU RFH CIR 21062 BECKWOU RFH CIR 21061 AMBERW ICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7314 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7308 Map#387 APN# Map#388 APN# Map#389 APN# 149-271-44 149-271-45 149-271-46 DATER SCOTT NGU WIN LYDIA HAX LAN RESIDENT 21051 AMBERW ICK LN 21041 AMBERW ICK LN 21021 AMBERW ICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7308 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7308 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#389 APN# Map#390 APN# Map#391 APN# 149-271-46 149-272-01 149-272-02 ENGH KIMBERLY PARKER HOLLENBECK MICHAEL NOWLING LAMES R 9062 MAHALO DR 21001 STRATHMOOR LN 21021 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BF ACH, CA 92646 7839 HIINTINGTnN RF.VH FA 92646-7 3 3 7 HLINTIN6'ON REACH, CA 92646-7333 .• �• Map N 392 APNN Map N 393 APNN Map N 394 APNN 149-272-03 149-272-04 149 272-05 CASELLA DAVID A RODRIQ LES ANTHONY JAMES CILLAY DONALD D 21031 STRATHMOOR LN 21041 STRATHMOOR LN 21051 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7333 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7333 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7333 Map N 395 APNN Map N 396 APNN Map I7 396 APNN 149-272-06 149-272-07 149-272-07 BLOOM 0 PHILLIP HEDVATYAHYA RESIDENT 21061 STRATHMOOR LN 20133 DELITA DR 21081 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7333 WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364-3520 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map N 397 APNN Map N 398 APNN Map N 399 APNN 149-272-08 149-272-09 149-272-10 JENNINGS DONALD 0 HANKS LINDA ELAINE DALY MICHAEL T 21091 STRATHMOOR LN 21101 STRATHMOOR LN 21111 STRATHMOOR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7333 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7335 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7335 Map N 400 APNN Map N 401 APNN Map N 401 APNN (+, 149-27301 149-273-02 149-273-02 }j�!•,(( REUTER STEVEN J SAN VICENTE RAMON TR RESIDENT 9772 CORNERBROOK DR 243 MORETON BAY LN UNIT 1 9782 CORNERBROOK DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7355 GOLETA, CA 93117-6216 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 -1— Map N 402 APNN Map N 402 APNN Map N 403 APNN 149-273-03 149-273-03 149-273-04 GLAVINIC MARK V RESIDENT MOSQ UEIRA ANN R 519 CREST AVE 9792 CORNERBROOK DR 24001 MUIRLANDS BLVD SPC 286 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-3440 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 LAKE FOREST, CA 92630-1712 Map$1403 APNN Map N 404 APNN Map N 405 APNN 149-273-04 149-273-05 149-273-06 RESIDENT SMITH ANTHONY ERIC ANDEF60N GAIL DONNA 9802 CORNERBROOK DR 9822 CORNERBROOK DR 8742 ADAMS AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7325 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-3902 9J Map N 406 APNN Map N 407 APNN Map N 408 APNN 149-273-07 149-273-08 149-273-09 CHAPMAN DENNISI QLESTA GARY S CROTHERS KENNETH 9942 CORNERBROOK DR 9852 CORNERBROOK DR 9862 CORNERBROOK DR U HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7325 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7325 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7325 Map N 409 APNN Map N 410 APNN Map N 411 APNN 149-273-10 149-273-11 149-273-12 MU 55ELMAN JAMES J TR DEMARS MARC KLIEM KEVIN 9872 CORNERBROOK DR 9882 CORNERBROOK DR 9892 CORNERBROOK DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7325 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7325 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7325 Map N 412 APNN Map N 413 APNN Map N 414 APNN 149-273-13 149-273-14 149-273-15 SKINNER PAUL PRICE BRIAN T LOPES GARY 9902 CORNERBROOK DR 9912 CORNERBROOK DR 11 CRESTWIND DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7326 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7326 RANCHO PALOS VERGES, CA 90275-5048 Map N 414 APNN Map N 415 APNN Map N 416 APNN 149-273-15 149-273-16 149-281-01 RESIDENT GILLINGER GREGORY M RESIDENT 9922 CORNERBROOK DR 9932 CORNERBROOK DR 21371 PINETREE LN HUNTNGTnN RFACH CA 9?646 HUNTINGTON PI A(H, CA 92646-7326 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 .• .. F Map N 417 Apr.:! Map N 418 APNN Map N 418 APNN U 149-281 02 149-281-03 149-281-03 COOK RUTH G RESIDENT OBRIEN CHARLES 21381 PINETREE LN 21391 PINETREE LN 6871 PRESIDIO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7558 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-3065 Map 01419 APNN Map N 420 APNN Map N 421 APNN 149-281-04 149-282-01 149-282-02 HALL ROBERT THOMAS BRAC CHARLES GOULD RONALD 1 O 21401 PINETREE LN 21362 PINETREE LN 21372 PINETREE LN Q HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7555 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 Map N 422 APNN Map N 423 APNN Map N 424 APNN 149-282-03 149-282 04 149-282-05 PHAN LY CONG ECHMALIAN CHARLES S RESIDENT 21382 PINETREE LN 21392 PINETREE LN 21402 PINETREE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map N 424 APNN Map N 425 APNN Map N 426 APNN 149-282-05 149-282-D9 149-282-10 O SMITH WANDORA THOMAS REARDON WILLIAM H WELLS CHESTER BU RRU S 329 RIO DEL MAR BLVD 21421 AUGU AA CIR 21401 AUGU AA CIR APTOS, CA 95003 5035 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 i— Map N 427 APNN Map N 427 APNN Map N 428 APNN 149-282 11 149-282-11 149-282-12 RESIDENT KORBON90 SY LVIA O TR COKER TROY �p 21391 AUGU AA CIR 23581 VIA CALZADA 21381 AUGU AA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691-3625 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 Map N 429 APNN Map N 430 APNN Map N 431 APNN 149-282-13 149-282-14 149-282-15 J BATLEY AARON C KELLER VENICE G LUNDE TY fV/ 21371 AUGU AA CIR 21361 AUGU AA CIR 21372 AUGU AA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 Map N 432 APNN Map N 433 APNN Map N 434 APNN 8 149-282-16 149-282 17 149-282-18 ZAFERIS DEMETRIOU SGEORGE BONILLA EDWARD A MARION WELEY J 21382 AUGU AA CIR 21392 AUGU SFA CIR 21402 AUGU SFA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 V__ Q� 3r-- •• �• Map 11 435 APN# 149-282.19 Map M 436 APNP Map N 437 APNN TRAN TRI D 149-282-22 149-282-23 21422 AUGU AA CIR GODFREY SEAN STAPLETON JASON HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7539 21421 PENSACOLA CIR 21401 PENSACOLA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 Map P 438 APN# Map M 439 APN# Map 4 440 APN# 149-282-24 149-282-25 149-282-26 BENSON THOMAS M MARTINEZ GEORGE P CLOW WILLIAM CU RTIS ^ 21391 PENSACOLA CIR 21381 PENSACOLA CIR 21371 PENSACOLA CIR (�^' HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 \ Map N 441 APN# Map p 442 APN$$ Map p 443 APN# 149-282.27 149-282-28 149-282-29 NEAL JAMES PATRICK DORREL MARTHA P HANN STUART D }7 21361 PENSACOLA CIR 21372 PENSACOLA CIR 21382 PENSACOLA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7549 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 Map 11444 APN# Map R 445 APN# Map N 446 APN# 149-282-30 149-282-31 149282-32 HSU HAO WEN GREEN RICHARD GENIS BEVERLY J 21392 PENSACOLA CIR 21402 PENSACOLA CIR 21422 PENSACOLA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7549 Map 4 447 APN# Map p 448 APNR Map p 449 APN7 ';- 149-282-35 149-282-36 149-282-37 SHIM CASEY N E DUNCAN PENNY P ALCALA RAUL 21421 LEMONTREE LN 21401 LEMONTREE LN 21391 LEMONTREE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7545 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7545 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7545 Map p 450 APN# Map p 451 APN# Map 8 452 APN# 149-282-38 149-282-39 149 282 40 HEMMERSBACH JUDITH A SCHRANTZ JOHN M POULOS JAMES W 7, 21381 LEMONTREE LN 21371 LEMONTREE LN 21361 LEMONTREE LN a HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7545 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7545 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7545 Map p 453 APN# Map a 454 APNR Map k 455 APN# (� 149-283-10 149-283-11 149-283-12 Jv[ OWEN BONNIE BETHANY MEDINA OMAR RESIDENT 21422 LEMONTREE LN 21402 LEMONTREE LN 21392 LEMONTREE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.7548 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7548 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map p 45S APN# Map II 456 APNR Map p 457 APN# N 149-283-12 149-283-13 149-283-14 PATTON LISA LUMBATTIS JANE MC GOVERN PATRICK TR 8081 ORANGETHORPE AVE 21382 LEMONTREE LN 21372 LEMONTREE LN BUENA PARK, CA 90621-3801 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7546 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7546 QQ Map a 458 APN# Map p 459 APNR Map p 459 APN# f� 149-291-01 149-291-02 149-291-02 j POLLGREEN MICHAEL EDWARD RESIDENT RIZKALLA BAHER 21341 PINETREE LN 21331 PINETREE LN 32701 SEVEN SEAS DR fJ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7553 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 DANA POINT, CA 92629-3527 1e Map p 460 APN# Map 4 461 APN# Map p 462 APN# 149-291-03 149-291-04 149-291-05 RESIDENT ZAMBANINI JASON SOLIS STEVEN 21321 PINETREE LN 21311 PINETREE LN 21301 PINETREE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HI INTINGTON BEACH, (A 7553 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7553 Map#463 APN# Map#464 APN# Map#465 APN# 149-291-06 149-291-07 149-291-08 DE NICOLA THOMAS ANTHONY BASSALINE BRIAN J MARTIN DAVID K 21291 PINETREE LN 9501 CHEVY CHASE DR 9521 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7552 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 Map#466 APN# Map#467 APN# Map#468 APN# 149-291-09 149-291-10 149-291-11 ANNIGONI JOSEPH SADLER ROBERT L COCHRANE WILLIAM HENRY III TR 9541 CHEVY CHASE DR 9551 CHEVY CHASE OR 9561 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 Map#469 APN# Map#470 APN# Map#471 APN# 5 149-291-12 149-291-13 149-291-14 p JU AR EZ MARCE LI N E D RICHARDSON TED E KRESS JEFFREY 9571 CHEVY CHASE DR 9581 CHEVY CHASE DR 9591 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7540 Map#472 APN# Map#473 APN# Map#474 APN# 149-291-15 149-291-16 149-291-17 PAYETTE BRU CE A KRU PKA NICHOLAS TR MYERS ROBERT O 9601 CHEVY CHASE DR 9611 CHEVY CHASE DR 9621 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7511 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7511 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7511 Map#475 APN# Map#476 APN# Map#476 APN# 149-291-18 149-291-19 149-291-19 'f•- OBRIEN GEORGE M BELL EDWARD RESIDENT 9631 CHEVY CHASE DR 68 VASSAR AISLE 9641 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7511 IRVINE, CA 92612-4142 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#477 APN# Map#478 APN# Map#479 APN# 149-291-20 149-291-21 149-291-22 BONIFACIO ARTU RD L FU MAKE TODD KAZUO SHAFFER ANTHONY M 21262 LEMONTREE LN 21282 LEMONTREE LN 21292 LEMONTREE LN '7 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7544 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7544 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7544 O Map#480 APN# Map#481 APN# Map#482 APN# 149-291-23 149-291-23 149-291-24 RESIDENT DECARO ROBERT DESAI SHASHIN 21302 LEMONTREE LN 30987 STEEPLECHASE DR 18985 FAIRMONT LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 SAN LAN CAPISTRANO, CA 92675-1930 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-6124 I Map#482 APN# Map#483 APN# Map#484 APN# 149-291-24 149-291-25 149-291-26 RESIDENT LATHAM TODD C NGU)EN HOANG C) 21322 LEMONTREE LN 21332 LEMONTREE LN 21342 LEMONTREE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7546 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7546 A Map#485 APN# Map#486 APN# Map#487 APN# 1� 149-291-27 149-292-01 149-292-02 Q� HAMLIN ALEKANDER C NORMAN GREGORY THOMAS CRICHTON JAMES 21352 LEMONTREE LN 21342 PINETREE LN 21332 PINETREE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7546 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 f Map#488 APN# Map#489 APN# Map#490 APN# 149-292-03 149-292-04 149-292-05 NICHOLLS IAN G CLARY HENRY LOUIS MORIZIO ANTONIO 21322 PINETREE LN 21312 PINETREE LN 9542 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7554 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7500 o• � . rA,p :j ,I rd:: MapN492 APNH Map#493 APNN N ' 149-292-06 149-292-07 149-292-08 BLANCIAK WILLIAM A BROWN JALEAH J CONLY DIANE C 9552 CHEVY CHASE OR 9562 CHEVY CHASE DR 5702 MAGNOLIA AVE STE A HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7500 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7500 WHITTIER, CA 90601-2931 Map 111493 APNN Map H 494 APNH Map H 494 APNN 149-292 08 149-292-09 149-292-09 RESIDENT HARMAN MARS HA S RESIDENT 9572 CHEVY CHASE DR 19801 SHORECLIFF LN 9582 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-3039 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 ` Map N 495 APNN Map H 496 APNH Map H 496 APNN N 149-292-10 149-292-11 149-292-11 j TERR IGNO JASON C NAYERS INA HOOSHMAND TR RESIDENT 9592 CHEVY CHASE DR 66 BALBOA CVS 9602 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7500 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663-3226 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map H 497 APNH Map I1498 APNH Map H 499 APNN 149-292-12 149.292-13 149-292-14 LOGAN THOMAS P MASU ZUMI FAMILY TRU ST MILLER RU SSELL D 9612 CHEVY CHASE DR 9622 CHEVY CHASE DR 9632 CHEVY CHASE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7S41 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7541 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7541 Map H 500 APNH Map N 501 APNH Map N 502 APNH 149-292-15 149-292-16 149-292-17 4— MITCHELLIAN WANG U-SHUN WATSON LAMES E 9642 CHEVY CHASE DR 9641 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9631 INDIAN WELLS CIR 7 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7541 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 Map N 503 APNH Map N 504 APNH Map H 505,506 APNN 149-292-18 149-292-19 149-292-20,21 SADAO FRANK Y JOHNSON ANDREW W ROSS MARY V 9621 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9611 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9591 INDIAN WELLS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 oz' V Map N 507 APNH Map N 508 APNN Map N 508 APNa 149-292-22 149-292-23 149-292-23 Q DA CUNHA DORIS E TR OLIPHANT WILLIAM VERNON RESIDENT Y�JJ 9581 INDIAN WELLS CIR 24299 PASEO DE VALENCIA APT 1314 9571 INDIAN WELLS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 LAGUNA WOODS, CA 92637-3120 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map N 509 APN4 Map N 510 APNN Map N Sll APNN NL� 149-292-24 149-292-25 149-292-26 LAVERY CHRISTOPHER JOHN ORTIZ MICHAEL HUEBEL EVA M 9561 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9552 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9562 INDIAN WELLS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 (�QQ Map H 512 APNN Map 4 513 APNH Map N S14 APN$I 149-292 27 149-292-28 149-292-29 STEWARD-LINE BEVERLY LYNN TR SORENSON BERTRUM N MILLER ROBERT K 9572 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9582 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9592 INDIAN WELLS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 Map N S15 APNN Map N 516 APNN Map N 517 APNN 149-292-30 149-292-31 149-292-32 GLODERY GREGORY A WESCHLER JOSEPH ROBERT ARR IOLA EDMUND W 9602 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9612 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9622 INDIAN WELLS CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH. CA 92646 7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, (A g2645 7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 01 . Map 9 518 APN# Map#519 APNn Map I7 520 APN# 149-292-33 149-292-34 149-301-01 LEONARD BRADLEY ROSS ENNIS TIMOTHY P RESIDENT 9632 INDIAN WELLS CIR 9642 INDIAN WELLS CIR 21131 CHUBASCO UN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7577 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#520 APN# Map 0 521 APN# Map#522 APN# 149-301-01 149-301-02 149-301-03 SHEEKS CAROLYN S BREWER DAVID WILSON PAUL 7233 TOLL DR 21141 CHUBASCO UN 15.2730 LAI ST ROSEMEAD, CA 91770-3830 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6427 PAHOA, HI 96778-9214 Map#522 APN# Map#523 APN# Map#524 APN# N RESIDENT 149-� 149-301-OS RESIDENT TIMMON T / IACKSON MICHAEI R 21151 CHUBASCO UN 21171 CHUBAS N 21181 CHUBASCO UN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEAC CA 92646-6427 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6427 Map#525 APN# Map#526 APN# Map#527 APN# 14 1-06 pp 149-301-07 149-301-08 90 DEAN J S ^ GARRISON JOSEPH R RESIDENT 21191 CHUB UN 21201 CHUBASCO LN 21211 CHUBASCO UN A HUNTINGTON SEA , CA 92646-6427 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6429 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 }v{ Map#527 APN# Map#528 APN# Map#529 APN# 149-301-08 149-302-01 149-302-02 HAMILTON R THOMAS W IIIiHT ADAM E MARMONT HOWELL R 811 AVENIDA SALVADOR 9562 VOLANTE DR 7553 FLOWER MEADOW DR -H SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92672-2322 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6450 SAN DIEGO, CA 92126-1047 Map#529 APN# Map#530 APN# Map 0 531 APN# 149.302-02 149-302-03 149-302-04 '\ RESIDENT CZAIA CHRISTOPHER M MCGINTY DONALD 9552 VOLANTE DR 9532 VOLANTE DR 9522 VOLANTE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6450 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6450 Map#532 APN# Map#533 APN# Map#534 APN# 149-302-05 149-302-06 149 302-07 41 BYERLEY WAYNE MICHAEL MORRISON DWAYNE LEON MCCORMICK BARRY D 9521 BLACKFIN CIR 9531 BLACKFIN CIR 6551 MORNING TIDE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6404 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6404 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-2604 1 Map#534 APN# Map#535 APN# Map#536 APN# 149.302-07 149-302-08 149.302-09 RESIDENT CLEARY DONALD THOMPSON DAVID CLEGHORN CA 9551 BLACKFIN CIR 9561 BLACKFIN CIR 9562 BLACKFIN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6404 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6404 Map#537 APN# Map#538 APN# Map#539 APN# 149-302-10 149.302-11 149-302-12 CERNOK JOHN T BELL RONALD D HOLTZ DAVID A 9552 BLACKFIN CIR 9532 BLACKFIN CIR 9522 BLACKFIN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6404 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6404 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6404 Map#540 APN# Map#541 APN# Map 4 542 APN# 149 302 13 149-302-14 149-302-15 MCC,LAID WILLIAM T RU DOLPH RICHARD C BU R'IANS WILLIAM A 9521 PANACEA DR 9531 PANACEA DR 95SI PANACEA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6442 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6442 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6442 09 Easy Peel'Address Labels Go to avery.com/templates .. Map N 543 APNu L'. APNN Map N 544 APNN 149-302-16 149- 7 D 149.302-17 DILTS RICHARD l BU 9N;SSZ.60W ER R SCHOOL HUNTINGTON BEACH DISTRI 9561 PANACEA DR 21141 THM LN 770 17TH ST y" HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6442 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92648-3426 Map N 545 APNN Map N 546 APNN Map N S47 APNN �q 149-302-18 149-302-19 149-302 20 BULLETTE G BRYAN GRACE RICHARD EDGERTON MARK 9562 PANACEA DR 9552 PANACEA DR 9532 PANACEA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6443 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6443 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6443 _ N Map N 548 APNN Map$1 SSl APNN Map N 552 APNN 149-302-21 149-311-01 149-311-02 AVALOS EDWARD CONTE LOUIS A LEGERE MICHAEL RAYMOND 9522 PANACEA OR 9571 ORIENT DR 9561 ORIENT DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6443 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6439 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6439 Map N 553 APNN Map N 554 APNN Map N 555 APNN 149-311-03 149-311-04 149-311-OS DORMAN JEFFREY H SANCHEZ DANIEL ROBERT GARVEY TIM P 9551 ORIENT DR 9531 ORIENT DR 9521 ORIENT DR _ HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6439 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6439 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6439 ` a— Map N 556 APNN Map N 557 APNN Map N 558 APNN 149-311-06 149-311-07 149-311-08 GILMORE CHARLES EDWARD II TR HALABI MOU SA PRENDERGAST DANIEL F 9511 ORIENT DR 21031 CHUBASCO LN 21041 CHUBASCO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6439 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6425 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6425 Map N 559 APNN Map N 560 APNN Map N 561 APNN 149-311-09 149-311-10 149-311-11 FLOOD JACK EDWARD JR TR HULME TIMOTHY H CHANG ANTHONY 21051 CHUBASCO LN 21061 CHUBASCO LN 21081 CHUBASCO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6425 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6425 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6425 RR Map N 562 APNN Map N 563 APNN Map N 564 APNN A..( 149-311-12 149-311-13 149-311-14 WOLTANSKI THEODORE M BROU SSARD JAMES E GILBERT DAVID 21091 CHUBASCO LN 21101 CHUBASCO LN 21111 CHUBASCO LN U HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6425 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6427 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6427 Map N 565 APNN Map N 566 APNN Map N 567 APNN 149-311-15 149-312-01 149-312-02 LA FAY MICHAEL JAMES DALY MAT-THEW JOHN PHILLIPS GERALD W 21121 CHUBASCO LN 21042 CHUBASCO LN 21052 CHUBASCO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6427 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6426 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646.6426 Map N 568 APNN Map N 569 APNN Map N 569 APNN 149-312-03 149-312-04 149.312-04 LEWIS CHRISTOPHER D LUTHER MICHAEL RESIDENT 21062 CHUBASCO LN 210802 CHUBASCO 21082 CHUBASCO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6426 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map N 570 APNN Map N 571 APNN Map N 571 APNN 149-312-05 149-312-06 149-312-06 CAVANNA PETER J RESIDENT THE CHUBASCO TRU ST 21092 CHUBASCO LN 21102 CHUBASCO LN 21120 CHUBASCO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6426 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Easy Peel'Address Labels Gotoavery.com/template Map It 572 APN# M :: l3 APNn Map a 574 APN# 1 2-07 149-312-08 149-312-09 SK OLNI IOT A LAMORE VIET ARMINIO MICHAEL OLIN 9521 VOLANTE 9531 VOLANTE DR 9551 VOLANTE DR FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 08 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6449 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6449 Map I1575 APN# Map 17576 APNP Map I1577 APN# 149-312-10 149-312-11 149-312-12 MC HENRY R E TR HU CHI YU PORTERFIELD THOMAS W 21101 INFERNO LN 21091 INFERNO LN 21081 INFERNO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6437 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6435 - N Map#578 APN# Map p 579 APN# Map If 580 APN# 149-312-13 149-312-14 149-312-15 Y RIJ FFINO JOSEPH M PALEO PAUL M HOWARTH DONALD 1 21061 INFERNO LN 21051 INFERNO LN 21041 INFERNO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6435 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6435 Map#581 APN# Map 71 582 APN# Map p 583 APN# 149-313-01 149-313-02 149-313-03 NOVITS CHRISTOPHER S FISHER NICHOLAS RESIDENT 21122 INFERN0 LN 21112 INFERNO LN 21102 INFERNO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6438 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6438 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map R 583,780 APN# Map p 584 APN# Map 11 585 APNIi 149-313-03, 151-383-22 149-313-04 149-313-05 YOMTOUBIAN MANIZHEH MILLER RICHARD C BOLLMAN PHILIP PO BOX 3595 21092 INFERNO LN 21082 INFERNO LN NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659-8595 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6436 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6436 Map p 586 APN# Map p 587 APN# Map 9 588 APN# 149-313-06 149-313-07 149-313-08 LV/a5/ JOHNSTON MATTHEW J GREEN DAVID R 21062 INFERNO LN 21052 INFERNO LN 23042 INFERNO LN Q� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6436 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6436 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6436 b Map p 589 APN# Map p 589 APN# Map N 590 APN# f 149-313-09 149-313-09 149-313-10 RESIDENT SU TTON ELLIOTT K PANCINO BRIAN ANTHONY ^ 21041 RED JACKET CIR 3378 ESKATON DR 21051 RED JACKET CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 PLACERVILLE, CA 95667-6465 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 CA SF�-OLJ.LI Lf�- L1-10?' �i N °LS P Tr HLANJ IN&TVN ZepCj} ' cp q 71.4Lv pf Jr. Easy Peel AddFess Labels Go to avery.com/templates Map N 591 APNN 149-313-11 41,:; r. ;91 APNN Map N 592 APNN RESIDENT 149-313-11 149-313 12 21061 RED JACKET CIR JOHNSON SU SAN L DANG BINH Q �7 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 7325 STEINBECK AVE 21081 RED JACKET CIR SAN DIEGO, CA 92122-2822 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 Map N 593 APNN Map N 594 APNN Map N 595 APNN 149-313-13 149-313-14 149-313-15 BRAKE LA KAAE ADAM J FAIRCHILD JASON (� 21091 RED JACKET CIR 21101 RED JACKET CIR 21111 RED JACKET CIR �..1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 N3 Map N 596 APNN Map N 597 APNN Map N 597 APNN ? 149-313-16 149-313-17 149-313-17 LIND BRIAN RESIDENT SHORE PAMELA ANNE 21121 RED JACKET CIR 21122 RED JACKET CIR 508 HILL RIDGE RD HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 LOUISVILLE, KY 40214-3545 Map N 598 APNN Map N 598 APNN Map N 599 APNN 149-313-18 149-313-18 149-313-19 Q RESIDENT CAPE JODY A KNUTSEN STEPHEN M 1LU 21112 RED JACKET CIR 719 13TH ST 21102 RED JACKET CIR , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-3432 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 Map N 600 APNN Map N 601 APNN Map N 602 APNN 149-313-20 149-313-21 149-313-22 SCHUBERTH DAVID ALAN FANOU SMOHSEN ROBERTSON GREG 21092 RED JACKET CIR 21082 RED JACKET CIR 21062 RED JACKET CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 Map N 603 APNN Map N 604 APNN Map N 605 APNN 149-313-23 149-313-24 149-313-25 6 REYNOLDS JOAN L TR KRAU SE HOWARD E BU RKART PAUL THOMAS p 21052 RED JACKET CIR 21042 RED JACKET CIR 21041 INDIGO CIR YK HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6444 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 Map N 606 APNN Map N 607 APNN Map N 608 APNN , 149-313-26 149.313-27 149-313-28 !1 KANDA EDITH Y WEISS MARK CU RTIS BYWATER COLETTE MARIE `I_ 21051 INDIGO CIR 21061 INDIGO CIR 21081 INDIGO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 Map 4 609 APNN Map N 610 APNN Map N 611 APNN (0 149-313-29 149-313-30 149-313-31 l0�� MILLER SCOTT J WATERHOU g LAW ENCE E WIGGINS SEAN 21091 INDIGO CIR 21101 INDIGO CIR 21111 INDIGO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 fi Map N 612 APNN Map N 613 APNN Map N 614 APNN 149-313-32 149-313-33 149-313-34 VERNICK MICHAEL C BUBLITZ MICHAEL W EBERW EIN MARY EVELYN 21121 INDIGO CIR 21122 INDIGO CIR 21112 INDIGO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 Map N 615 APNN Map N 616 APNN Map N 617 APNN 149-313-35 149-313 36 149-313-37 LARSEN ADAM M 0 CONNOR BARBARA CHRISTINE CASSIDY KOBAYASHI KOHEI 21102 INDIGO CIR 21082 INDIGO CIR 21062 INDIGO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 9'646.6134 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 biquettes . .. r___'1 I Easy Peet Address Labels Go to avery.com/templates AVERY .• Map#018 APN# '.L,p#619 APN# Map#620 APN# G. 149-313-38 149-313-39 149-313-40 UND 10 ANN WHITCOMB JON B DBROT JEAN-PIERRE&KAREN 21052 INDIGO CIR 21042 INDIGO CIR 21032 INDIGO CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6434 J_ Map#621 APN# Map#622 APN# Map#623 APN# 149.313-41 149-313-42 149-313-43 WHITCOMB KELLI LYNN SPITALERI MICHELLE R FINLEY STEWART (a 21031 COCOBANA LN 21041 COCOBANA LN 17682 GAINSFORD LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6430 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6430 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649-4723 Map#623 APN# Map#624 APN# Map#625 APN# 149-313-43 149-313-44 149-313-45 D RESIDENT RESIDENT HAMILTON JOHN E III TR 1&K H 21051 COCOBANA LN 21061 COCOBANA LN 21081 COCOBANA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6430 Map#626 APN# Map#627 APN# Map It 628 APN# 149.313-46 149-313-47 149-313-48 FERR ETTI JOSEPH M KRU EGER KENNETH BERTSCH PAUL 21101 COCOBANA LN 21111 COCOBANA LN 21121 COCOBANA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6432 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6432 =k-- Map#629 APN# Map#629 APN# Map#630 APN# 149-314-01 149-314-01 149-314-02 MONPERE CHRISTOPHER RESIDENT KELSO MATTHEW 1670 Q LAIL DR 9601 ORIENT DR 9611 ORIENT OR MILPITAS, CA 95035-4720 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6440 Map#631 APN# Map#632 APN# Map#633 APN# 149-314-03 149-314-04 149 314-05 SOMES RICHARD G GALLIMORE ANDREW CRANDALL SAMUEL A 9621 ORIENT DR 9641 ORIENT DR 9651 ORIENT DR 4J HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6440 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6440 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6440 IyVV�, Map#634 APN# Map#635 APN# Map#635 APN# 149-314-06 149-314-07 149-314-07 SMITH JAMES L BLYTH STEVEN E RESIDENT (� 9661 ORIENT DR 21061 SHAW LN 9671 ORIENT DR U HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6440 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7141 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#636 APN# Map#637 APN# Map#638 APN# 149-314-08 149-314-09 149-314-10 BAILEY JANET R JONES RICHARD L STEINHOFF WALTER EDWARD 9691 ORIENT DR 9701 ORIENT DR 1000 N COAST HW ETE 10 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6440 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6441 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651-1356 f Map#638 APN# Map it 639 APN# Map#640 APN# 149-314.10 149-314-11 149.314-12 RESIDENT PATCH BRENDAN SMITH GORDON 9711 ORIENT DR 21022 COCOBANA LN 21032 COCOBANA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6431 Map#641 APN# Map#642 APN# Map#643 APN# 149-314-13 149-314-14 149-314-15 GLINSCAS ANTHONY KILLAM WILLIAM M 21042 COCOBANA LN 21052 COCOBANA LN 21062 COCOBANA LN HUNTIN6TW4 PATCH, CA 92646-6431 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA °N»6 [,.:l1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6431 AVERY .0 r Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avery.com/templates Map R 644 APN# .:4 APN# Map a 645 APNN 149-314-16 149-314-16 149-314-17 RESIDENT LE TUAN SAUNDERS GENE RU SELL 21082 COCOBANA LN 9199 CROCU SAVE 21092 COCOBANA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-1434 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6431 Map If 646 APN# Map N 647 APNN Map N 648 APN# 149-314-18 149-314-19 149-392-06 REZAI FARHAD REINER U DITH B NGU YEN VAN C 21102 COCOBANA LN 21112 COCOBANA LN 9421 SHADWELL DR 9 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6433 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6433 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7213 Map p 649 APN# Map M 649 APN# Map It 650 APN# v 149-392-07 149-392-07 149-392-08 3 LE KEVIN RESIDENT PHAM DANNY S 306 SARA JANE LN 9431 Sh adwell 10855 TU FNLEAF LN PLACENTIA, CA 92870-5135 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7213 TUSTIN, CA 92782-4342 Map It 650 APN# Map M 651 APN# Map p 651 APN# 149-392-08 149-392-09 149-392-09 RESIDENT NGU YEN ANTHONY A RESIDENT (� 9441 SHADWELL OR 17816 PORTO MARINA WAY 945191 adw el o HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272-4154 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7213 Map It 652 APN# Map 0 653 APN# Map a 654 APNN 149-392-10 149-392-11 149-392-12 ..�— LE HOANG H TROUT TAD A BARLOW KEVIN P 9461 SHADWELL DR 21032 SPU RJEY LN 21D42 SPU FNEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7213 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7214 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7214 Map 0 655 APN# Map 4 656 APN4 Map It 657 APNN O 149-392-13 149-392 14 149 392 15 ((off WOO WILLIAM DO MU UNHU CHIEF HENG KIM 21052 SPU FNEY LN 21072 SPU INEY LN 21082 SPU RNEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7214 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7214 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7214 Map k 658 APN# Map It 659 APN# Map N 660,678,724 APNI$ 149-392-16 149-392-17 149-392-18. 149-395-01, 149-404-01 }( WONG LARRY M FLEMING JASON HUNTINGTON Pl. YLA� 21092 SPU FNEY LN 21102 SPU FNEY LN 3501 JAMBOREE RD STE 200 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7214 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7214 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-2995 n Map tt 661 APN# Map It 662 APN# Map k 663 APN# 149-393-10 149-393-11 149-393-12 DUNCAN JAMIN A CHO WILBERT Y GOUD RAMESH M 9412 SHADWELL DR 9422 SHADWELL DR 9442 SHADWELL DR N HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7212 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7212 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7212 Map tt 664 APNO Map R 665,677,685,692,707,723 APNII Map 9 666 APN# 149-393-13 149-3 4 149-394-16, 149-401-16, 149-402- 149-393-15 SHAO STEVEN 16, 149-403- 49-403-53f. KIM YONG AN 9452 SHADWELL DR PLACE HUNTINGT 9451 DARK OW DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7212 3919 WESTERLY Pl.ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7231 NEW,PORT BEACH, CA 926 -2324 Map p 667 APN# Map It 668 APN# Map p 669 APN# 149-393-16 149-393-17 149-393-18 BASTA BOB KING BERNARD YEH ROGER Y T 9441 DARR OW DR 9421 DARROW DR 9411 DARROW DR HUNTINGTON RFACH, CA 92646-7231 HtUNTINCTON M ArH CA 92646-7231 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7231 Easy Peel Address Labeis Go to avery.com/templates Map N 670 APNN Map N 671 APNN N;: 149-393-19 149-394-10 149-394-11 TSENG JAMES MCNEELY DAVID W THE KUMAR FAMILY TRU ST 9401 DARROW DR 9392 DARROW OR 9402 DAM OW DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7231 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7232 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7233 Map N 673 APNN Map N 673 APNN Map N 674 APNN 149-394-12 149-394.12 149-394-13 LEY CHEAK RESIDENT BIONEU FO LLC 1505 MCPHERSON LN 9412 DARROW DR 9422 DARR OW DR BAKERSFIELD, CA 93311-3571 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7233 N Map N 675 APNN Map N 676 APNN Map N 679 APNN 149-394-14 149-394-15 149-401-10 MUNOZ DANIEL E HOANG LIEN THIMINH BIEBER STEVEN R 9442 DARROW DR 9452 DARROW DR 9391 POWER DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7233 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7233 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7236 Map N 680 APNN Map N 681 APNN Map N 682 APNN ^ 149-401-11 149401-12 149-401-13 11/1 BOLTON RHONDA M W KiHT DAVID E DOAN BONG l}.) 9401 POWER DR 9411 POWER DR 9421 POWER DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7237 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7237 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7237 Map N 683 APNN Map N 684 APNN Map a 686 APNN 149-401-14 149-401-15 149-402-10 CHENG U NG KUAN NGU 1EN CAT DANG BARR THEODORE 1 9441 POWER DR 9451 POWER DR 9392 POWER DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7237 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7237 HUNTINGTN BCH, CA 92646-7234 Q Map 111687 APNN Map N 688 APNN Map a 688 APNN (N'y- 149-402-11 149-402-12 149-402-12 (V� LE HAI HOANG LU VINCE RESIDENT 9402 POWER DR 13432 ERIN RD 9412 POWER DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7235 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92944-2312 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 ^ Map N 689 APNN Map N 690 APNN Map N 691 APN4 149-402-13 149-402 14 149-402-15 MADENLIAN ARAM PRAM VANTHI THI LU UTHU YDUC 9422 POWER DR 9442 POWER DR 9452 POWER DR CA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7235 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7235 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7235 Map N 693 APNN Map N 693 APNN Map N 694 APNN 7(� 149-402-17 149-402-17 149-402-18 j�pp GENOVA JOE A TR THE J&S GEN RESIDENT BUI BRIAN P 18672 PATRICIAN DR 9451 LAWTON OR 9441 LAWTON DR VILLA PARK, CA 92861-4211 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7245 Map N 695 APNN Map N 696 APNN Map N 697 APNN 149-402-19 149-402-20 149-402-21 NGU 1EN HOI PHU LE TRIEU HU YNU KAZARIAN GARY 1 9421 LAWTON DR 9411 LAWTON DR 9401 LAWTON DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7245 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7245 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7245 Map N 698 APNN Map N 700 APNN Map N 701 APNN 149-402-22 149-403-29 149-403.31 KEWALRAMANI CHANDRABHAN HARIRAM HAYDEN JEFFREY M BENDER LESLIE CHARLES 9391 LAWTON DR 21221 FERN CIR 21241 FERN CIR HUNTINGTON BFACH, CA 92646-7244 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 , . Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avef-y.com/templattes AVERY .• Map M 702 APNM Map M 703 APNM Map M 704 APNM 149-403-32 149-403-33 149-403-34 MCCLARY TERM G Q U YFAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TR HENTGES TODD A 21252 FERN CIR 21242 FERN CIR 21232 FERN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 �J Map M 705 APNM Map M 706 APNM Map M 708 APNM V 149-403-35 149-403-36 149-403-38 KOELLER CHARLES D HATA U 5TIN TERUO NESBITT EDWARD H 21222 FERN CIR 21212 FERN CIR 21211 SPU RJEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7247 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7243 Map M 709 APNM Map M 710 APNM Map M 711 APNM p 149-40339 149-403-40 149-403-41 JORDAN MAW T KELLEY DAVID B KIEU U DIE 21221 SPU RJEY LN 21231 SPU RJEY LN 21241 SPU FNEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7243 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7243 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7243 �RR Map a 712 APNM Map M 713 APNM Map M 714 APNM 149-403-42 149-403-43 149-403-44 TRAN JOHN Q BELIAIEV NICHOLAS ONG TAN VINH 21252 SPU FNEY LN 21242 SPU FNEY LN 21232 SPU RJEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7242 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7242 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7242 :} Map M 715 APNM Map M 716 APNM Map M 717 APNM 149-40345 149-403-46 149-403-47 NGU YEN TRU NG T BOTROS SAMIR S RU BIN BEVERLY P 21222 SPU FNEY LN 21212 SPU FNEY LN 21202 SPU FNEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7242 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7242 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7242 y7 V Map M 718 APNM Map M 719 APNIt Map M 720 APNM 149-403-48 149-403-49 149-403-50 SAI YUI ARANA FORTUNATO GUTIERREZ LU PAUL 21192 SPU FNEY LN 21172 SPU RJEY LN 21162 SPU FNEY LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7215 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7215 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7215 Map M 721 APNM Map M 722 APNM Map M 725 APNM 149-403-51 149-403-52 151-231-13 AMBORN RON L WOEN LI CHYUAN AVERSA JOSEPH G SR TR 21152 SPU FNEY LN 21142 SPU WEY LN 20931 NATIONAL LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-721S HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7215 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6545 Map M 726 APNM Map M 726 APNM Map M 727 APNM 151-231-14 151-231.14 151-231-15 BOGHOSSIAN EDOUARD RESIDENT GRIFFIN NANCY L 15503 LOS ALTOS DR 20941 NATIONAL LN 20942 SPARKMAN LN HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745-5216 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6530 Map M 728 APNM Map M 729 APNM Map M 729 APNM 151-231-16 151.232-39 151-232-39 BRADSHAW ROBERT P RANDALL MICHAEL G RESIDENT 20932 SPARK MAN LN 6771 FINDLEY CIR 9821 KITE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6530 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-3075 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map M 730 APNM Map M 731 APNM Map M 732 APNN lS1-232-40 1S1-232-41 151-232-42 BENAVIDEZ IAN M JONES JAMES LUTHER A TR GREENHUT DAVID G 9941 KITE DR 9851 KITE DR 9861 KITE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6535 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6535 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 4'6-F AVERY .0 Easy Peel Address Labels Map#733 APN# M, ,r: ;J4 APN# Map#735 APN# (� 151-233-02 151-233-03 151-233-04 ANDERSON JAY ELWOOD VALDEZ ROBERT MANUEL GU STAFSON KATHERINE M 20911 SPAR(MAN LN 20931 SPARK MAN LN 20941 SPARK MAN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6529 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6529 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6529 Map#736 APN# Map#737 APN# Map#738 APN# 151-233-05 151-233-06 151-233-07 RU OMAN INGEBORG M HERNANDEZ JV LIA U AVILES RICARDO 1 20951 SPARKMAN LN 9762 KITE DR 9772 KITE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6529 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6536 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6536 N Map#739 APN# Map#740 APN# Map#741 APN# 151-233-08 151-233-09 151-233-10 HAMMAN ROBERT W HEYER ROBERT F KELLY STEVE 9782 KITE DR 9792 KITE DR 9802 KITE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6536 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6536 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6536 Map#742 APN# Map#742 APN# Map#743 APN# 151-233-11 151-233-11 151-233-12 HUANTE LANCE RESIDENT HU HENRY 1 1187 GLENEAGLES TER 9812 KITE DR 18376 MOUNT STEWART OR — COSTA MESA, CA 92627-4049 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-6445 -Y Map#743 APN# Map#744 APN# Map#745 APN# 151-233-12 151-233-13 151-233-14 RESIDENT LE THU MINH THI PINTERPE SAM J 9822 KITE DR 9842 KITE DR 9852 KITE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6536 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6536 Map#746 APN# Map#747 APN# Map#748 APN# 7 151-234-01 151-234-02 151-234-03 (O/ NEWTON HENRY RJ SKY CHARLES JACKSON DEREK 9872 KITE DR 9882 KITE DR 9892 KITE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6540 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6540 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6540 Map#749 APN# Map#750 APN# Map#751 APN# 151-371-07 151-371-08 151-371-09 HAYES DAVID DANA JAMES J HOLLAND MARY JO 20912 Q LEENS PARK LN 20932 Q 1EENS PARK LN 20942 Q LEENS PARK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6524 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6524 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6524 Af �O .. AV I ERY 5160 Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avery.com/templati p-),!,)io,,line to expm Pop-up Edge Use Aveq Template 5160 1 Map N 752 APNN 151-371 10 %1,ip N 753 APN4 Map N 7S4 APNN UDELL ELIZABETH 151-371-11 151-372 08 20952 QLEENS PARK LN DRAKE MICHAEL L PASSARELLI FRANK HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6524 20962 Q LEENS PARK LN 20931 Q LEENS PARK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6524 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6523 Map 111755 APNN Map N 756 APNN Map N 756 APNN 41 151-372-09 151-372-10 151-372-10 (� MOELLER WOLFGANG E TR RESIDENT WONG YA LI TSAI 7j 20941 Q LE ENS PARK LN 20942 BALGAIR CIR 630 HARDCASTLE CT Vt HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6523 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 SAN RAMON, CA 94583-6015 Map N 757 APNN Map N 758 APNN Map N 759 APNN 151-372-11 151.372-12 151-372-23 BOGART MARK S FOX NATHAN OW W KENNETH AIR TR y 20932 BALGAIR CIR 20912 BALGAIR CIR 20911 BALGAIR CIR (O� HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6424 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6424 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6424 Map N 760 APNN Map N 761 APNH Map 9 762 APNN A 151-372-24 151-372-25 151-372-26 STREIT TERRY L TR THE 2019 T L DECKER JEFFREY M GUNAL MEMDUH 20931 BALGAIR CIR 20941 BALGAIR CIR 20942 HUNTER LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6424 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6424 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6416 A.- Map 111763 APNN Map N 764 APNN Map 4 764 APNN 151-372-27 151-372-28 151-372-28 OLSON BLAKE 5 RESIDENT BU FGH JASON S VANDER 20932 HUNTER LN 20912 HUNTER LN 9841 JAMES RIVER CIR n HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6416 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-7309 (��S Map N 765 APNN Map N 766 APNN Map N 766 APNN 151-373-01 151-373-02 151-373-02 MARGOLIS SCOTT J GUZMAN NELSON A RESIDENT 9702 SCOTSTOUN DR 24952 VIA DEL RIO 9692 SCOTSTOUN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6400 LAKE FOREST, CA 92630-2632 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 (� Map N 767 APNN Map N 768 APNN Map N 769 APNN 151-373-03 151-373-04 151-37305 ^ SCHELIN ETHAN SOBOT SANYA MOUNIER JERALD D y, 9682 SCOTSTOUN DR 9672 SCOTSTOUN OR 9662 SCOTSTOUN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6400 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6400 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6447 Map N 770 APNN Map N 771 APNN Map N 772 APNN (p- 151 37306 151-373-07 151-383-13 00_°00 TSAI AIN DYKEMA SU E M SW EETSER BRADLEY KU W 9642 SCOTSTOUN DR 9632 SCOTSTOUN DR 20901 WOODLEA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6447 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6447 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6423 AA+ Map N 773 APNN Map N 774 APNN Map N 775 APNN ^ 151-383-14 151-383-15 151-383-16 LONG SCOT E KINMAN CHRISTOPHER JAMES UNDERW OOD HENRIETTE 9572 JU RA OR 9582 JU RA DR 9592 JU RA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6413 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6413 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6413 Map N 776 APNN Map N 777 APNN Map N 778 APNN 151-383-18 151-383-19 151-383-20 SCHOENINGH JOE BONEV BOZANA LE THANG 20931 HUNTER LN 20941 HUNTER LN 9591 SCOTSTOUN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6415 t-I %TIN,,'ON RF-''I (A �`r 6 (11'. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6449 ... - e _ AVERY .0 Easy Peel Address Labels Go to ave I Edge Map#779 APN# Llap#780 APN# Map It 781 APN# 151-383-21 151-383-22 151-383-23 STORTZ STEVEN P RESIDENT SNYDER ROSE A 9581 SCOTSTOUN DR 9571 SCOTSTOUN DR 9561 SCOTSTOUN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6445 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6445 n l Map#782 APN# Map#783 APN# Map If 784 APN# 7K 151-383-24 151-383-25 151-383-26 ll/ RAINER MICHAEL A FUKUDA MIKE TOYOKI PROVOST CAMERON 9541 SCOTSTOUN DR 9531 SCOTSTOUN DR 20912 GLENCAIRN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6445 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6445 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6410 SID Map#785 APN# Map#786 APN# Map#787 APN# 151-384-25 151-384-26 151 384-27 HACKETT ADAM C PHAM TIEN ANH HAUGE COREY 20931 GLENCAIRN LN 20941 GLENCAIRN LN 20951 GLENCAIRN LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6409 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6409 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6409 Map If 788 APN# Map#789 APN# Map#790 APN# v 151-384-28 151384-29 151-384-30 HUNT BRIAN C DIALLO IBRAHIMA P WRIGHT RITCH S 9512 SCOTSTOUN OR 9532 SCOTSTOUN DR 9542 SCOTSTOUN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6446 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6446 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6446 Map#791 APN# Map#792 APN# Map#793 APN# 151-384-31 151-384-32 151-384-33 NOH DAEKYOUNG DINH VINH HUU VB INVESTMENTS LLC 9562 SCOTSTOUN DR 9572 SCOTSTOUN DR 9151 ATLANTA AVE UNIT 8234 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6446 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6446 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615-2627 Map#793 APN# Map#794 APN# Map#795 APN# 151 384-33 151-384-34 151-384-35 RESIDENT VU SYLVIE SHIMABUKURO KENNETH M 9582 SCOTSTOUN DR 9592 SCOTSTOUN DR 9602 SCOTSTOUN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6446 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6447 Map#796 APN# Map If 797 APN# Map#797 APN# 151-38436 151-384-37 151-384-37 LEE STEVEN ALF MOKE ESPIRITI RESIDENT 1 9612 SCOTSTOUN DR 9441 GATESHEAD DR 9622 SCOTSTOUN DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6447 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-8445 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 Map#789 APN# Map If 799 APN# Map If 799 APN# 151-446-10 151-446-11 151-446-11 (p ARAGON VINCENT E RESIDENT WILLIAMS KELLY L D° 20972 CRESTVIEW LN 20982 CRESTVIEW LN PO BOX 7666 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-5954 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615-7666 fi Map It 800 APN# Map#801 APN# Map#801 APN# 9 151-446-12 151-446-13 151-446-13 5•— JORDAN WILLARD STANLEY KOMANAPALLI SAM B RESIDENT 9442 FIRESIDE OR 9332 SHADWELL DR 9432 FIRESIDE DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-5906 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7200 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 . . .. Utilisez le Gatwil AverV 5160 AVERY .• 1: r Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avery.com/temp pi�ates 149-122-01 149-122-02 149-122-03 CAPPS BIRL LEON FOSTE IAN /t., MAHDAVI MASSOUD 21112 AMBERWICK LN 211 12 AMB ICK LN 9514 MARIPOSA AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7310 HUNTINGTON BE CA 92646-7310 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-2805 Z 149-122-04 149-122-OS 149-122-06 NGUYEN CHINA VAN VANHOANG LE LONG WONG GILBERT YAO YEE 21142 AMBERWICK LN 21152 AMBERWICK LN 12534 WEDGWOOD CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7310 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7310 TUSTIN, CA 92780-2878 149-122-07 149-122-08 149-122-09 SELENO BRIAN THOMAS PETROSINO THOMAS WALKER JR MICHAEL A 9 21172 AMBERWICK LN 21192 AMBERWICK LN 21202 AMBERWICK LN ti HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7310 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-7310 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-7313 O 149-122-10 149-123-16 149-123-17 HALL SUZANNE NGO CATHERINE TIEU TR DERKSEN ELISABETH 20732 FARNSWORTH LN 1810 CHILTON CT 9972 EFFINGHAM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-5550 FULLERTON,CA 92833-5057 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7329 149-271-55 149-271-56 149-122-03 FAHEYJAMES MICHAEL VAN WIG EDWARD L RESIDENT 21082 AMBERWICK LN 8451 COMPTON OR 21132 AMBERWICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7338 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-3103 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-731 149-122-06 149-122-10 149-123-16 RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT ], 21162 AMBERWICK LN 21212 AMBERWICK LN 9952 EFFINGHAM DR �f HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7310 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7313 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-7329 yQ2 149-271-56 149-271-53 149-271-52 Sla RESIDENT OHHASHI, TADASHI CHANG, MARGARET i 21102 AMBERWICK LN 21062 AMBERWICK LN 21052 AMBERWICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-7310 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646 (A 149-271-51 149-271-50 149-271-47 VADALA, DOMINIC MAYEDA, RICHARD YONE DEWITT, RONALD J 21042 AMBERWICK LN 21022 AMBERWICK LN 21011 AMBERWICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 149-271-48 149-271-49 149-271-54 p HEATON, SEAN ARCHULETA, FRANK MOELLER,CHRISTOPHER ?� 21002 AMBERWICK LN 21012 AMBERWICK LN 106 TRAFALGAR LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92672 149-271-5 RESIDENT 21072 AMBERWICK LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 . . r 1 2 2 V HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc.of Realtors Del Mar Estates j�7f President Dave Stefamdes Ron Grundy, President 16787 Beach Blvd.4202 25552 La Paz Road 19521 Brookhursl Street Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-2960 54 57 5 Third Party Environmental Review Kathleen Belohovek Huntington Beach Tomorrow Southern California Edison Company 9101 Five Harbors of President 2244 Walnut Grove Ave, GO-1,Quad 2C Huntington Beach,CA. 92646 PO Box 865 Rosemead, CA 91770 Huntington Beach,CA 92548 N 62 7 60 Randy Cce,CCIM CA Paula Leonard Senior Vice President Ri'ha Spicer '1 4951 Hilo Circle Land Advisors Organization 818 West 7th, th Floor V Huntington Beach,CA 92647 100 Spectrum Drive,Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 17 (5 Irvine,CA 92618 i 8 INTEROFFICE- 9 ? 65 ETI�Corral 1DO ' Homeless United Huntington Beach Jean Kimbrell,Treasurer EDVIfODfTlCfltBl Board Shirtey DetloN �J PO. Box 2298 Tess Nguyen 6812 Laurelhurst Drive Huntington Beach,CA 92647 3r' Floor Huntington Beach,CA 92647 — 13 ' Newland House Museum Pies., H 8. Historical Society 19820 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 14 Historic Resources Board Chair Kathie Schey 3612 Rebel Circle Q) Huntington Beach,CA 92649 17 Kirsien Berg 1 18870 Kithira Circle Huntington Beach.CA 92648 N 9 19 O.C. Ping. 8 Dev. Services Dept O.0 Planning 8 Develop. Dept. Director Michael Balsamo P.O. Box 4048 P.O. Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4D48 t 20 21 22 City of Costa Mesa City of Fountain Valley City of Newport Beach Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director P O. Box 1200 102DO Stater Ave. P O. Box 1768 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Newport Beach, CA 92663-8915 23 24 City of Westminster CM of Seal Beach Planning Director Planning Director 8200 Westminster Blvd 211 Eighth St. Westminster,CA 92683 Seal Beach,CA 90740 �, . � A�ry ' • -6 17 Department of Transportation, Drst. 12 Maureen El Harake, Branch Chief 1750 E 4m Street#100 Santa Ana,CA 92705 28 29 29 Huntington Beach Post Office Fountain Valley School District Fountain Valley School Distrid 1 Rina LU New Growth Coordinator Dr. Mark Johnson,Superintendent I D055 Slater Avenue 5 Executive Assistant 6771 Wamer Ave. 10055 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Fountain Valley, CA 92706 30 30 31 D HB City Elementary School DistrictHB Crty Eiiii School District OmanView School District Leisa Winston, Ed. D,Superintendent Cyrthia rrero, Ed D 2 Arm Cindy Puffer,Admin. Services 7i 8750 Dorsett Or. 17011 Beach ,Ste 560 1 17200 Pinehurst Lane (.J Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach, 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 OR 31 32 32 Dr.Michael Conroy,Ed.D Westminster School District Westminster School Distnd Deputy Superintnedent,Administrative Services Keith Grafton,Assistant Superintendent Cyndi Paik,Superintendent Ocean View School Distrid 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 14121 Cedatwood Avenue 3 17200 Pinehurst Lane Westminster.CA 92683 Westminster, CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 'h 33 33 34 HBUnion High School District HS Union High School District Cannery Hammon Properties, LLC Jeff Starr,Assistant Superintendent Dr.Clint Hand. Superintendent Ascon Landfill Srte Tamara Zewr 5832 Bolsa Avenue 5832 Bolsa Avenue One Pointe Drwe.Nide 320 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Brea,CA 92821 36 OC County Harbors,Beach 8 Parks Dept. P O. Box 4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 37 38 38 y Bella Terra Mall County View Estates HOA- Country View Estates HOA N Attn: Pat Rogers-Laude Carrie Thomas Gerald Chapman 7777 Edinger Ave.#300 6642 Trotter Drive 6742 Shire Circle Huntington Beach.CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 40 Hearthsde Homes 27285 Las Ramblas,Suite 210 �— Mission Veto, CA 92691 42 CC Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 42 42 42 AES Huntington Beach, LLC Richard Loy John Ely Eric Pendegraft. Plant Manager 9062 Kahului Drive 22102 Rockport Lane 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach.CA 92646 Bea_^. CA ,1`4� i 43 HB Coastal Communities Assoc. -F) David Guido p 143 E.Meats Avenue Orange,CA 92865 46 46 46 San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 8 Anthony Morales,Chief Aciachemen Nation Joseph Ontiveros,Cult.Res.Director V PO Box 693 31411 La Matanza Street PO Bos-487 San Gabriel,CA 91778 San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-2625 San Jacinto,CA 92581 N 46 47 47 Andrew Salas,Chairman AYSO Region 55 AYSO Region 56 Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Commissioner Mark Dilaura Commissioner Ann McCarthy PO Box.393 PO Box 1852 PO Box.8205 Covina,CA 91723 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 47 - AYSO Region 117 47 AYSO Region 143 Huntington Beach Jr.All American 47 �.J Commisioner David Fiduccia Doug Wood Football 9114 Adams Avenue#150 16458 Balsa Chica-PMB#568 Barry Kudlack Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 18432 Goodwin Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92547 .y Huntington Beach Pop Warner47 47 Football Gold Coast Extreme North Huntington Beach Futbol Club 471 Hector Martinez Rick Bauer,President President Shereen Walter PO Box-04W 20501 Suburbia Lane 1511 Lakeside Lane (� Huntington Beach,CA 92615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 fP 47 47 47 South Coast Bayem Futbol Club HuntingtbR.Beach Youth LaCrosse Oakview Renewal Partnership Manssa Pena Mr el.Mutrie Jose Rodriguez 22922 Eucalyptus Lane PO Bo 56 PO Box 3476 Lake Forest,CA 92630 Huntington Beach, 92615 Huntington Beach,CA 92605 47 47 47 Fountain Valley Pony Baseball Huntington Beach Gift Softball Huntington Valley Little League Al Letua Gerry Steele,President Michael Kircher 14591 Yucca Circle 6172 Shelly Dr. 9767 Cornwall Drive Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington-Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 47 47 47 �0 Ocean View Little League Robinwood Little League Seaview Little League vw' Stephanie Green, President Kathryn Beutel-Lui Michhel Mailman 18041 Starnont Lane 6551 Rennrick Circle P.O.Box 5305 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92615 47 South Huntington Beach Girls Fast Pitch 47 Softball West County Family YMCA Barry Colbum Rom Erickeson P.O. Box 7332 2300 Univeristy Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92615 Newport Beach,CA 92660 49 Coastkeepers Gary Brown 3151 Airway Ave.Suite F-110 Costa Mesa,CA 92663 .r Moore, Tania From: Christine Gonzalez <cgonzales@scng-com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 3:52 PM To: Moore, Tania Subject: Re: PH Notice - Killarney's Rooftop Dining & Gisler Residential Attachments: 11492429.pdf affidavit OC Register Legal Advertising Chrissv Gonzalez 1771 S. Let+'1s St. Anaheim, CA 92805 713-796-6736 N14 8:00 a.m. - 3:30 P.M. Lunch 12 Noon to 1:00 p.m. Closed Sat. and Sun. On Thu. Sep 30. 2021 at 1:21 PM Christine Gonzalez <cgonzales dscnc.coni Hurl Cost $408.00, pub HB Wave 1 W. The Smudge marks in the pdf will be bullet points in print. 1 1. APPEAL OF I HE PLANNING COMMISSION'SAI OF- EN I I I LEMEN I PLAN AMENUMENI h (KILLARNEY'S ROOF IOP DINING) Appli, Bergsma, TEAM Design Property Owner: Gregor Appellant : Councllmember Mike Posey Conditional Use Permit No. 99-021 to permit the conve existing restaurant rooftop to a 1,936 sq. ft. dining area sales and service. This request includes participal Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for sixteen ( spaces required for the new dining area, and deviatic Exhibit B Standard Conditions of City Council Resolutior regarding hours of operation. The Planning Commis: public hearing of EPA No. 20-001 on August 10, conditionally approved the request. Location: 209 Main f (West side of Main Street, north of Walnut Avenue) C1 Hayden Beckman, Senior Planner 2, GENERAL PLAN AMENUMEN I NO, 70-OOZ LON AMENUMENI NO. 20-007, MI I IGA I EU N UECLARAIION NO. 20-002 (GISLER RESIT Applicant : Derek Spalding, Brookfield Residential Rec - To amend the land use designation from Public (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Resi Density (RL). LMA - To amend the zoning designation f Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density. MNU - To Wential environmental impacts of the proposed pn Planning Commission held a public hearing on these app OC Register Legal Advertising Chrissy Gonzalez 1771 S. Lewis St. Anaheim, CA 92805 714-796-6736 M-F 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Lunch 12 Noon to 1:00 p.m. Closed Sat. and Sun. On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:56 AM Moore, Tania <Tania.Moore@surfcity-hb.org> wrote: Hi Chrissy, Please publish the attached PH Notice in The Wave, on October 7. 2021. 2 ( hank Nou. Tania Moore Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office 714-536-5209 tania moore(cbsurf city-hb.org 3 NunHngton Beach Wave 1771 S. Lewis Street Anaheim, CA 92805 714-796-2209 5196687 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY OF- PLANNING & PROOF OF PUBLICATION BUILDING 2000 MAIN ST Legal No. 0011492429 ISELA SIORDIA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 B_E_FORETHE"CITY-COUNCILOF THE CITY-OF HUNTINGTON BEACH— NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, October 19, 2021, at FILE NO. 101921 combined 6:00 P.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a Public hearing on the following Planning and Zoning items: AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ❑l. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL. OF ENTITLEMENT_._ PLAN AMENDMENT`-NO. 20001 (KILLARNEY'S—ROOFTOP )App DINING= li cant-Jeff STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Bergsma TEAM Design Property_ Owner: Gregory Newman Appellant: Councilmember Mike Posey Request: To amend $$, Conditional Use Permit No. 99-021 to permit the conversion of an existing restaurant rooftop to a 1,936 sq. ft. dining area with alcohol County of Orange sales and service. This request includes Participation in the Downtown Parking In-Lieu Fee Program for sixteen (16) parking spaces required for the new dining area, and deviation from the Exhibit B Standard Conditions of City Council Resolution No.2017-42 regarding hours of operation. The Planning Commission held a Public hearing of EPA No. 20-001 on August 10, 2021, and I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the conditionally approved the request. Location: 209 Main Street, 92648 (West side of Main Street, north of Walnut Avenue) City Contact: County aforesaid, I am over the age of eighteen years, and Hayden Beckman,Senior Planner not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. 1 02. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO.20-002 ZONING MAP am the principal clerk of the Huntington Beach Wave, a AMENDMENT—NO._20-002,_MITlrXTED- NEGATIVE_ P P 9 DECLARATION—NO. 200.002 (GISLER -RESIDENTIAL--- newspaper newspaper that has been adjudged to be a newspaper of Applicpnt: DDerek Smlding, Brookfield—Residential-Request:.GPA - To amend the land use designation from Public-Semipublic general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of (underlying Residential Low Density) (PS(RL)) to Residential Low Density (RL). ZMA-To amend the zoning designation from Public. Orange, State of California, on July 1, 1998, Case No. Semipublic (PS) to Residential Low Density. MND -To analyze the A-185906 in and for the Cityof Huntington Beach, Count Potential environmental impacts of the proposed proiect. The 9 Y Planning Commission held a Public hearing on these applications on of Orange, State of California: that the notice, of which the SLeptember 28, 2021, and recommended approval to the City Council. oc ation: 21141 Strathmoor Lane, 92646 (west side, south of annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in Bluefield Drive) City Contact : Ricky Ramos each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item al iscategorically exem- any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: Pt from the Provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No.2 is covered by Miti- 10/07/2021 gated Negative Declaration No. 20-002, approved by the Planing Commission on September 28,2021. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 20-002 is an file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for Public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE : A copy of the Proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury under the California 92648, for inspection by the Public. A copy of the staff report will be available tq inter00sled parties at the City Clerk's Office or on line laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true at hitp://www.hunimgtonbeachco.gov on Thursday,October 14,2021. and Correct: ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If You challenge the City Council's action in court, you Executed at Anaheim, Orange County, California, on may be limited to raising only those issues you.or someone else raised at Date: October O7, 2021. the Public hearing9 described in this notice, or m written correspondence delivered to the Cii at,or Prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions Please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above Items. Direct Your written communications lathe City Clerk �� Robin Main Street,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach �/ 2Cit Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huniingf9nhepchca goo/HBPublkCommenis(_ Signature Published Huntington Beach Wave OCt.7,2021 11492429 ,.tP,.,L,v,e i Estanislau, Robin From: Feather Hocking <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 8:58 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara, Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie, Fikes, Cathy, CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/05/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENTAL Sincerely, COMMUNICATION Feather Hocking Meeting Date: /O - / 9- oelO�I �7 a/ 71 4uenda Ism No: Icatherhockin<,a gmail.com (714) 717-7408 21022 Shacklef'ord Circle, Suite / A. SUITE. / APT Huntim_ton Beach. CA 92646 z Estanislau, Robin From: Michele Barrett <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:49 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan, Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL, Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/06/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed. the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENTAL Sincerely, COMMUNICATION Michele Barrett kereling Date: A* t - ,OP-04 tWn No. 7� 7 a 7/e Michelebhb a aol.com 21051 Shackleford Cir Huntimston Beach. Ca 9264E z Estanislau, Robin From: Keith G Jones <no-reply@gislemeighborhood.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 10:33 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/06/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. SUPPLEMENTAL Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. COMMUNICATION Sincerely, Mee" Daft; Keith G Jones r /� t Agenda I*rn No kjoncs44 @soca1.rr.com 21062 Hagerstown Cir. Fluntington Beach CA.92646 Hun. 2 Estanislau, Robin From: Amy Stokes <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 12:31 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda: Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan, Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL, Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/07/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SL PPI.EME N1 AL COMMUNICATION Sincerely, _ M'°Amy Stokes 1 AnnrMq IMm iJn / ��// aersto kes&niaiLcom (626) 644-4094 21042 Shacklelbrd Cir Fluntimoton Bcach, CA 92646 z Estanislau, Robin From: Benjamin Kaska ono-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 10:26 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/08/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed. the addition of quality homes. potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time. shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Sincerely, Benjamin Kaska Mee�ng Date:_ u 4aenda IMm Fn :,----- benkaska a .-maiI.com (805) 455-5646 21062 Shackletord Circle Huntineton Beach. CA 92646 z Estanislau, Robin From: Cynthia Kaska <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 10:26 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/08/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes. potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs oNTAL Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. COMMUNICATION Sincerely. Meeting Date' /0—/9 72?0 a'/ Cynthia Kaska �a7 1 Agenda Item No.: ben kaska a gmail.com (805) 455-5646 21062 Shackleford Circle Huntington Beach. CA 92646 z Estanislau, Robin From: Zoey Kaska <no-reply@gislemeighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 10:27 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/08/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENT AL COMMUNICATION Sincerely, Zoey Kaska Meeting Date: �i- Agenda Item No.�a7a: I benk ask a a gmaiI.con) (soy) 45.-5646 21062 Shackleford Circle Huntington Beach. CA 92646 2 Estanislau, Robin From: Owen Kaska <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 10:27 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda, Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie, Fikes, Cathy, CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/08/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed. the addition of quality homes. potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time. shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore. providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Sincerely. Meetkp Date: /O` // 'iv?I�✓ Owen Kaska --77 t Agenda darn No. �OS: 7�— 71 benk ask a a ,mai1.com (805) 455-5646 21062 Shaekleford Circle FluntinaFon Beach. CA 92646 z Estanislau, Robin From: alicia waterhouse <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 12:39 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/08/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Sincerely, Meetirrg Date. /O _ f ajo a/ alicia waterhouse t Agenda rem � � 7 mackwater(a aol.com (714) 402-83)12 21 101 Indigo Circle huntin._ton beach. CA 92646 2 Estanislau, Robin From: Maria Spurgeon <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, October 8,2021 1:12 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy,CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/08/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. $UPPLEMENI AL Sincerely, COMMUNICATION Maria Spurgeon AAeerirq p—o?Do�� 1 `f Aro+rwln IMn Aln�� I - mariaspurr;c@ gmaiLcm (480) 570-0303 21 192 Strathmoor lane 1113. CA 92646 2 Estanislau, Robin From: Mark Burdette <no-reply@9islerneighborhood.com> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 2:08 PM To: Carr, Kim, Bolton, Rhonda: Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike, Delgleize, Barbara, Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie, Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/08/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookrield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. St)PP+, PMENTAL Sincerely, COMMUNICATION Mark Burdette Meemp Date Ap —/P 07047/- t �7�/ TiS) 4aenda Ilatn No.: theburdettes a mac.com (714) 653-2906 10 19 1 Patch Drive Huntington Beach. CA 92646 z Estanislau, Robin From: Chad Sorensen <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2021 6:26 PM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda, Peterson, Erik, Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara: Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy, CITY COUNCIL, Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential'. Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/09/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity. the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENTAL Sincerely, COMMUNICATION Chad Sorensen Meeting Dab: t Agenda"&M No.!nn??Z6F -7�sr chadsorcnscn742002 a yahoo.com (714) 330-6604 21032 Shackleford Circle Huntington Beach. CA 92646 2 Estanislau, Robin From: Alan Rasmussen <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:18 AM To: Can, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda: Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/10/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. SUPPLEMENTAL Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. COMMUNICATION Sincerely, Meetkq Date: /O -/9-a OaV Alan Rasmussen t Agenda IMfm No.'rl�7 el,�/ —7i) ras Ill issena a aoIo.com 21061 .Amberwick L.n I luntin_ton Beach. CA 92646 z Estanislau, Robin From: Michelle Weedon <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2021 11:55 AM To: Carr, Kim; Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Solourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmaii.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/10/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will he missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENI AL COMMUNICATION Sincerely, Michelle Weedon Meftv Daft: t koenda Ikvn No.f a 7 mweedonhb a 2mail.com (714) 619-7880 218;1 Summenvind Lane Huntim ton Beach. California 92626 z Estanislau, Robin From: Joanne Archuleta <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2021 4:13 PM To: Carr, Kim, Bolton, Rhonda; Peterson, Erik, Posey, Mike, Delgleize, Barbara, Kalmick, Dan; Moser, Natalie; Fikes, Cathy; CITY COUNCIL; Bolourchi, Farhad; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged 10/10/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values, A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. SUPPLEMENTAL Sincerely, COMMUNICATION Joanne Archuleta Meeting Date:- r -7 ry Agenda Item No.: i 7 mejomom4 a�.,mail.com z Estanislau, Robin From: nocleugh@hotmail.com Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 11:22 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: I OPPOSE the proposed Gisler Residential Project Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I oppose the proposed Gisler Residential project. When South Huntington Beach was developed, the City and the School District agreed that school sites would be the resource used to provide sports fields for the community. Other Orange County cities chose to provide recreational facilities in different ways which explains why the City of Huntington Beach has fewer sports facilities than all its neighbors and pretty much all the comparable cities in Orange County. But the choice made by Huntington Beach has been fine. It has served the community well for 60 years in South Huntington Beach. However, now that the School District is in sell sites mode to generate money, the recreational facilities need to be either preserved or replaced. The need for sports fields is greater than ever and it will continue to grow. Cities change. It is your responsibility to ensure that the City of Huntington Beach changes for the better. Future generations need sports fields. Building houses on the largest and the ONLY field with lights in South Huntington Beach is not a change for the better. It is a change for the worse. Thank you for voting to protect the fields for future generations. Best regards, Brian Cleugh Gisler Neighborhood Resident SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: AP Agenda Memo / t Estanislau, Robin From: Aaron Batley <Aaron@nbvacationproperties.com> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 11:44 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Field Zoning Map Amendment Dear City Council, I am a resident of the "Showcase Track" which abuts the Gisler Park and the former Gisler Middle School. My wife and children have lived in the area since 2010 and our 2 boys have been playing on this field for 10 years and are still using it for both practice and games right now today. (My son is in AYSO U-14) The boys also use the basketball hoops and playground to skateboard, drive their remote control cars, play roller hockey and other similar activities when the school (Brethren Christian) is/was not session. Please do not allow the Gisler Field to be re-zoned permanently without finding a suitable alternative for our area youths to utilize. The Gisler site is particularly valuable because it is large, with five fields(over 20%of AYSO Region 56 fields), but the biggest factor is it has LIGHTS. It is the only lighted soccer field (not used for baseball/softball) in all of South Huntington Beach (92626). Rezoning it without a permanent alternative, would be a terrible thing for our local families and their children. While I think it is pure short-sightedness and folly that the School District(s) are selling off their "surplus land" for short term gains, it is even worse that the City, which has first right of refusal to buy the land, didnt spend the money to keep these parcels as open space. I'm sure many residents believe the City has occasionally wasted taxpayer money throughout the years(ex. 15311 Pipeline Lane), while open space for our City has not been made a priority. Much of the remaining open space in South HB is not only limited, but almost entirely confined to land that was donated to, and now owned by, the School Districts. With the Wardlow, Lamb and Lebard sites, where pursuant to the Naylor Act as codified in Education Code Section 17485, et seq., the City of Huntington Beach purchased parts of those sites, due to the fact that it included land which was currently being used for school playground, playing field, or other outdoor recreational purposes and open-space land particularly suited for recreational purposes. However, the City declined to purchase ANY part of the Gisler site. At $42 million, I can understand why the City didn't buy all 14 acres, but none? Has the City assumed that the Gisler School sites are unnecessary for recreational open space purposes for use by local residents?Why? All we get is for our kids to play under the high voltage power lines along the SCE easements? The City doesn't have any of these School District School sites listed as open space. (HB are you paying attention?) While there are some City parks located adjacent to the School sites (green), all of the school sites and their fields are zoned Public-SemiPublic (gray) that can at any time just be given up to redevelopment/re-zoning. This is terrible. Look at the current open space in green at the Gisler site. Its laughable. Look at the City Zoning Map. I don't see a lot of Open Space in South HB (green color)do you? SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Agenda ftinfa.� 0 � . ktwm An l ' .41 sl A.e Ha dwn A" Please consider either: • purchasing a portion of the Gisler land from the developer (if that is even still possible) or setting aside funds for portable or permanent lights at a couple of the remaining fields left that are close to Gisler. • You also could and should consider mandating that the new development going in at the Magnolia Tank Farm add additional acres for sports field use on top of the measly 2.9 acres. (should be double that or triple) • The City could also consider purchasing as much land as possible from the District on the former Kettler School Site and put lights on it, as it adjoins the Edison Sports Park and Community Center and thus is a natural fit. • Accepting money from the developer in lieu of providing the ACTUAL facilities we need is unacceptable, unless the funds are used IMMEDIATELY to purchase, develop, upgrade or acquire a similar LIGHTED site. There are many other public school sites closed both within the HBCSD and our City, including Arevalos(closed 1988) and Burke Elementaries (closed 1985) (now Pegasus and Huntington Christian), as well as many other sites in the Ocean View and Fountain Valley Districts. Moiola Elementary right off Brookhurst and Garfield and a stones throw from the HB City border, has also been sold by the FVSD to a developer. Lets do the right thing for our future citizens and acquire as much of this open space as possible that the School Districts are so foolishly selling off. As a reminder to the City Council and to the public, here is a list of other closed school and field sites closed and/or sold by the Huntington Beach City School District andHuntinpton Beach City School District and(FVSD): City purchased part of the Site: 1. Wardlow Elementary at 9191 Pioneer Dr. (closed in 1989 and home to the Huntington Valley Little League) 2. Le Bard Elementary at 20451 Craimer Ln. (closed in 1989 and home to the Seaview Little League) 2 3. Lamb Elementary at 10521 Yorktown (closed in 1989 and now has an almost unusable field for organized sport due its small size) City purchased none of the site 1. Gisler Middle School at 21141 Strathmoor (closed in 1986 and now soon to be gone?) City should consider acquiring: 2. Kettler Elementary at 8750 Dorsett Dr. (closed in 2005 and now the HBCS District HQ) 3. Perry Elementary at 19231 Harding Ln. (closed in 2020—status TBD) 4. Sowers Middle School at 9300 Indianapolis Ave. (Rumor that School District wants to close this and consolidate the entire area into Dwyer) As a reminder, I include the following CA law giving municipalities first right of refusal to acquire school district land: CA Educ Code § 17485 (2017) The Legislature is concerned that school playgrounds, playing fields, and recreational real property will be lost for those uses by the surrounding communities even if those communities in their planning process have assumed that the properties would be permanently available for recreational purposes. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this article to allow school districts to recover their investment in surplus property while making it possible for other agencies of government to acquire the property and keep it available for playground, playing field or other outdoor recreational and open-space purposes. Thank you for your consideration Aaron Batley, MBA, CPI11 The Balboa Rcalty Group 813 East Balboa Blvd. Nc%%I)ort Bcach, CA 92661 CA BRE Broker License #01255609 The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee.The information may also be legally privileged.This transmission is sent in trust,for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient.If you have received this transmission in error,any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited.If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail or phone and delete this message and its attachments, if any. 3 Estanislau, Robin From: brooke rasmussen <flemingbrooke@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:11 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential SAVE THE FIELDS11111 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION AAeetltp Derr: AWWe Item No. t Estanislau, Robin From: Walter Mitchell <walterlmitchell3@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:40 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential Picase protect our youth sports fields! fhe financial motivation to rezone the Gisler site to residential is very enticing. However, providing resources that support our community and our kids also has the financial benefit associated with the desirability of our community. Please don't lose sight of this when considering the rezoning of the Gisler school site. The school field sites are our only fields in SEHB, they are imperative to youth sports and our neighborhoods. Gisler is our only site with full-size fields (1-114 and over) and LIGHTS! If this site is removed please support and assure finding for lights at another site and find a location for additional full-sized fields. Youth sports are very important to me and to the community. Please help preserve and support the needs of our great community. Thanks for the consideration, Water Mitchell SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION k%ftV Date. /a - 1 0;-( Agenda - n?7 71 t Estanislau, Robin From: Violet Ibrahim <violet.nashed@gmaiLcom> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:41 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: clubnews@bluesombrero.com Subject: Please save our SEHB playing fields Dear City Council Men and Women, Thank you for your service! 1 am writing to implore for your help in literally saving HB youth sports. As you know we may very likely lose the only playing fields we have left to rezoning. 1 appeal to you as a mother of 3 with two of those being young boys, we need this space desperately. This is the first time my boys have been able to participate in team sports and it has done wonders for them! That being said, all of the neighborhood youth sports fields in SEHB are located on school sites. We need the City to understand the importance of and support us in keeping these fields in tact or providing an adequate replacement because these fields are heavily used and vital for the survival of youth sports in our neighborhoods and for our families-my family in particular. My boys participate in AYSO and SKYHAWKS. Having just moved from NYC where having a field to play an sport on is non-existent. The benefit of these fields is so important for the healthy development of our youth and for the healthy socialization of our families the community. This is what sets us apart. Please don't allow us to become like a big city where prioritizing our youth & family falls far short! We would be very grateful and specificalh ask that vou: • Keep Gisler which is our only site with full size fields (1.114 and over) and LIGHTS or • Support and assure funding for lights at another field site • Replace the only full size fields in SEHB at another site This kind of support would leave such a positive impression on your constituents. Please show HB youth& families that they matter to you. SUPPLEMENTAL Sincerely, COMMUNICATION Violet Ibrahim Meeting Daa. /o_ /9 - .2o — - —y— Agenda %rn No.— t Sent from my il'ad z Estanislau, Robin From: Main <paprika3l@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:53 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Giesler Please provide funding to support Youth sports!!! The AYSO is part of why families love it here in HB, and we need fields to play on! Jessica Lutz Huntington Beach, CA Si.°PPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting fete: - /9 :�/4'::' _p Agenda Item No.: 1'/ �O 1 Estanislau, Robin From: Shelly ray <shellylynn143@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 9:56 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Soccer! We need our little ones to have a outlet in Soccer. Please think about the children! Shelly Ray 949-929-6658 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date. �7��� C� 7/ 4genda Hern Nr,.._/ i Estanislau, Robin From: Nicki DeProsperis <nickideprosperis@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 12:33 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler residential Hello-1 am writing to ask that you insist the builder provide a youth sports soccer field-one that houses 2 large full size soccer fields with lights. Financing will be needed for the complete work necessary to expand the grass, irrigation, flattening, lights, etc. at the proposed new sites (Edison CS/Peterson). AYSO is a completely voluntary organization, supporting up to 2k children yearly with 400 volunteers. I played soccer all my childhood, my daughter plays for Extra U12 & I want to watch her kids play AYSO soccer. Youth sports are imperative to the livelihood of the community, kids, parents & grandparents alike. Please let me know what more I can do to support this much needed cause. Thank you Nicki DeProsperis 714-330-9739 Nicki DeProsperis 714-330-9739 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meelkq Dar.: Al - Agenda Ilan,No1a�7 Estanislau, Robin From: Robert Gregg <rgregg@lanap.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2021 4:22 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential Hello, We reside in Huntington Beach. Our 3 children grew up playing AYSO soccer in HB over the past 12 years. Youth soccer was the only sport our kids played up to and in one case into high school. Our 3rd child is playing and thriving as a result of AYSO and the Gisler fields and facilities. This past year without team sports due to COVID had a very adverse impact on our kids who would otherwise play soccer. The critical importance of the mental, psychological and emotional health of youth who play sports is well documented. It has been an activity that gets them out of the house and off their electronics and video games. We've enjoyed living in Surf City for over a decade, where there are opportunities for youth sports such as soccer. It would be a sad development to see another school and field close to developers without a replacement. Thank you, Robert H.Gregg, DDS -S-l"PLEMENTAL L OMMUNICATION )ate. . G 4oenda Item No.• 710 1 Estanislau, Robin From: Hewitt,JJ <1Hewitt@cta.org> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:16 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Kalmick, Dan Subject: Gisler Residential Hello there, Save open spaces for youth sports! •The School field sites are our only fields in SEHB. They are imperative to youth spons and our neighborhoods. •Gisler is our only AYSO site with full-size fields (U 14 and over)and LIGHTS •Please support and assure funding for lights at another field site. •Please replace the only full-size fields in SEHB at another site •AYSO is important and youth sports are important to my family •Thank you Jeremiah "JJ" HewM He/Him/His Field Services Specialist, California Teachers Association (EST 1863) (714) 978-8861 (office) 1 (714) 978.2423 (fax) I ihewitt@cta.org 281 N Rampart St A, Orange, CA 92868 'Where toolct' Are the Peotuot? Where Are the NarraeavZett, the MohiAAn., the Pokavz 'et, an.Gl ruavt�j other ovtGe powerful tribes of our people? TheLA have van-.shed before the Avarice Anal the oppvessiovt of the White Man., as svtow before A s"nkmev Sun..'- Chief Tecumseh, shavvrw SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeliry Dare. /D - / — GOC/ Agenda Item Noa7 t Estanislau, Robin From: RK Nimmons <rnimmons@socal.rr.com> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 9:39 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: GISLER FIELDS I have been with AYSO soccer since 1983. 1 have officiated games at all levels and am now back with AYSO because of my grandchildren. They need fields to play on. They need fields to practice on. Something has to be done with Gisler School property to allow soccer. You'll say there is lots of space, but not so for AYSO. Club Soccer control the fields at all neighboring high schools and are not about to let us play on them. They pay high rent, take care of the field cost and have said NO!!!!!!!!!! to AYSO. You'll say try the 1R. High Schools and elementary schools. All have been alloted to AYSO by regions. Region 56 is being asked to and is being impacted by this transaction. CAN'T YOU ALL DO SOMETHING TO SAVE SOCCER AT THE AYSO LEVEL111P ""III I I I I At least guarantee the existing field space for us. There are no schools open to us. The high schools are locked into Club Soccer and are not about to give AYSO field space at reduced rates. There are no "park spaces" near Region 56. The only option is to cancel soccer for ages 14 to 19 within our Region. We also will have to cancel soccer for ages 5 thru 8. They use a portion of the field space at Gisler for their games. The other schools in South Huntington are all being used either by REGION 56 or REGION 117. Take away these field and REGION 56 is done. Surely, you can talk with the developers about letting us use the existing fields. Its been done before and could be done again if you support us. IT'S UP TO YOU.............EITHER WE HAVE SOCCER OR WE DON'T. IT'S A SHAME YOU HAVE FORCED US TO CONSIDER ACTUALLY CLOSING UPSHOP!!11!I! !! SINCERELY YOURS. R. K. NIMMONS 18061 SHOREVIEW CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 PHONE: 714-847-7838 SUPPLEME:vi;AL COMMUNICAT10N Meeting Date: IO - / Agenda Item No. !!!P• 7 Otg/— 7/5 t Estanislau, Robin From: Kellie Ciccoianni <kelliecicco@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 4:17 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential To HB City Council. Our son plays on the AYSO Extra Team Breakers We have been extremely happy with his Coach, facility and performance As we are in mid-October and head towards the end of Daylight Saving Time, it is imperative that Huntington Beach have a place where kids can practice and play with their teams under the lights At 5pm darkness, we need a field that can accommodate ALL teams and ages in Southeast Huntington Beach Our son's team practices at Gisler Monday and Wednesday from 5-7pm Without a field with lights, they will not be able to practice If Gisler is going to be rezoned from public to residential we are asking this of the City Council: - Support and assure funding for lights at another field site - Replace the only full size fields in Southeast Huntington Beach at another site We have no doubt you all are aware of the benefits and positive impact team sports have on our children We needs to have fields they can practice on with their teams We also want to make sure it is a safe environment which lights help provide. We would appreciate you supporting our youth team sports. Kindest regards Kelhe & Gerard Gamboa SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mr*ON Date: / ' /y - oj�OZ >perAe Item Nn.: t Estanislau, Robin From: Aaron Haley <superhaley@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 12:37 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Gisler Residential Project Dear Mayor Cart and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the ONLY fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over) and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. My 7 year old son discovered AYSO last Spring and had an incredible experience! His athleticism surged while making many new friends and looking forward to every practice and game at Gisler. This fall he is back in AYSO and thriving. He looks forward to soccer practice and enjoys suiting up for games every Saturday. I encourage Mayor Carr and the council members to visit Gisler and see the soccer balls rolling around and hear the playful cheers of the kids on the fields. It's imperative to keep this green space at Gisler for our children and future generations of AYSO. Please keep Gisler Green! Sincerely. Aaron Haley Business owner Thank you! AYSO Region 56 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mm" Date. Agenoa itom r.l 1 , 71 1 Estanislau, Robin From: Michelle Marckwordt <mmarckwordt@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 12:40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Protect Field Space for our Youth Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our ONLY site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our ONLY site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard. if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Our community and our children benefit from having proper fields on which to participate in active and healthy sports. Please don't take that away from our youth. Having sports in their lives keeps youth connected and out of trouble. It builds self esteem and teaches teamwork. Can we count on you to support our children's best interest? We hope so. Sincerely. Michelle Marckwordt SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meetlrlg Date:_ /G - 1 9 - E?c� Agenda nem hlo.-?11I�2T - 7 r Estanislau, Robin From: nabils@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 12:41 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Park Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible,to practice and play their games. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. As a father of 2 that went through the AYSO program and a volunteer referee until today, I cannot begin to tell you the impact the program has had on the youth of the city. The impact of losing this field is tremendous. Sincerely, Nabil Shihadeh Home owner in HB since 1990 Sent from my Whone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION mefty tee: Agenda Mam %J� �R'( t Estanislau, Robin From: Lindsay Stoker <stoker.lindsay@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15,2021 12:53 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org;CITY COUNCIL Cc: Stoker, Brandon J. Subject: Gisler residential project Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. My name is Lindsay Stoker. 1 live in the Seacliffarea of Huntington Beach and 1 am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. We just moved here from Fullerton, have four boys, and youth sports are very important to our family as they teach teamwork, good sportsmanship, and other critical skills for children to transition from youth to adulthood. Sincerely, Lindsay Stoker Lindsay Stoker. RPR. CRC SUPPLEMENTAL. COMMUNICATION Vee8no Date. /® —/Y — o?Oa� 6oenda ltam No.• �4RL�71X r Estanislau, Robin From: Lily Nguyen <lily.nb.nguyen@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 1 S, 2021 1:12 PM To: supplementalcomm@surf city-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Please help our AYSO programs 1 am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Please look into an alternative to provide lights for our fields. AYSO is very important for many of our families. Our kids love soccer and would like to be able to continue playing soccer. With practices three times a week it helps to take my kids away from spending their time on their ipad but instead being active and playing a healthy sport. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION MOON Date: /A -// -07®';'t/ 4ttende Krim►Jo. 7 Qq / " 718) t Estanislau, Robin From: Amy Rogan-Mehta <amy.rogan@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 1 S, 2021 1:2S PM To: supplementalcomm@ surf city-hb.org, CITY COUNCIL Subject: Concern about Gisler Residential Project Dear Mallor(arr and ( UnnCil Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U W and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams%i II find it hard, if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Our son has played in AYSO for three years,and it's been one of the most positive experiences he has had since we moved to Huntington Beach. It would be a huge loss for our family and our community if AYSO games and practices couldn't continue there. Sincerely. Amy Rogan-Mehta 20211 Everglades Ln, Huntington Beach,CA 92646 SUPPLEMENTAL COPAMUNICATION klee&Voft: 149-I?-a, t Estanislau, Robin From: arnaud bougard <abougard@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 1:37 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler soccer field Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. AYSO soccer has been essential to my daughter's development as a soccer player and a person. My daughter has been playing soccer for region 56 for 8 years now. Started off as a rec player and is now playing for their top flight U13 extra team. It would be very sad to see them loose a field without it being replaced. Sincerely, Arnaud Bougard SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION 4fee5ng Date.�O - 1 .— jar-- Agenda Item No.: / t Estanislau, Robin From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 1:45 PM To: Agenda Alerts: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Youth soccer fields From: Maureen<maureenkeating76@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 1:41 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Youth soccer fields Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Paris. We have been doing AYSO for 7 years. All 3 of my children play currently and they absolutely love it. It is very important to give a healthy and safe space to children to stay physically active, build self esteem,and learn the importance of being pan of a team. AYSO is such an important pan of the community and we have to support the youth with more positive experiences. Sincerely. Maureen Keating Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION k4eetkq Date: /o - /9 -o{ Oa/ agenda Urn No.& 7 c / - 7i&) t Estanislau, Robin From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:07 PM To: Agenda Alerts, supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: From: Ben Haas<bahaas@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:00 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible to practice We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park The most appealing aspects of Huntington Beach are its family friendly nature and spirit of a close community Youth sports and communal use spaces are vital to maintaining those aspects My wife and I chose to leave LA to start a family in Huntington Beach for these reasons We've seen how overdevelopment and a lack of communal spaces and youth sports facilities can quickly degrade the community and reduce the standard of Irving Please consider these requests and keep Huntington Beach the strong family supporting community that it is Sincerely. Ben Haas SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee&V Date: /c Agenda %m N0.1!11�?7 t Estanislau, Robin From: Jessica R. Geremia <jessgeremia@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:19 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org, CITY COUNCIL Subject: Gisler Residential project -- Please consider adding lighting/fields to other sites Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. While the plans for homebuilding are wonderful and I do not oppose that effort. I do believe there is a flipside of this coin. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are critical to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard. if not impossible, to practice. When programs do not have a location,they shut down. When an area has nothing to offer as far as sports/activities for young children,families move to more desirable locations. I urge you to keep the future in mind by considering how existing families with small children spend their time in our city --outside, participating in sports, in parks and fields that can be used year-round. When you take those away, the people leave shortly after. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Our family has enjoyed AYSO--as parent volunteers,and as children participating. We are amazed at the volume of people who come out and show up for it. It truly builds a strong community that thrives on young families feeling like they belong together. I hope you will continue to support such efforts and organizations. Sincerely, Jessica Geremia Lifetime Resident of Huntington Beach Jessica R. Geremia 1714.785.5318 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION M"&V Date._ D I f—a/asj Apends ham No 9�/ �r — ��� Estanislau, Robin From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:22 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org, Agenda Alerts Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: SAVE YOUTH SPORTS FIELD SPACE! From: Brent Garza <garzabrent77@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:16 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: SAVE YOUTH SPORTS FIELD SPACE! Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members I am writing about the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports. they are imperative to our AYSO program and our neighborhoods In addition. Gisler is currently our only site with full-size fields (U 14 and over) and our only site with lights Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard if not impossible to practice We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site We are also asking the City to commit to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park I grew up in Huntington Beach. playing on the same fields my two boys are currently playing Sport has many benefits for kids. It improves physical fitness. teaches essential life skills, and increases their chances of becoming active adults. Please make the right decisions Future generations are depending on you. Sincerely. Brent Garza Si1PPLEMEN' Ait COM MUNICAT?CPi Meeting Date. Agenda Item No.: ? 7 r,;;��71A t Estanislau, Robin From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:23 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; Agenda Alerts Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Youth sport fields needed; please help this cause From: Haley, Michelle<mhaley@cccd.edu> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:21 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Youth sport fields needed; please help this cause Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing regarding the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. My family just recently started utilizing Gisler field for soccer, and it is incredibly disappointing to think that Huntington Beach would not prioritize having a sports center for our youth. The school field sites are the only fields in southeast Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will be unable to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Sincerely, Professor Haley Department of Geography SUPPLEM' COj1 MUNIG n Mss"Daly: O - / — o� Agenda ftem No.Y 7. t Estanislau, Robin From: Chris Miller <cmillertime32@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 3:15 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Field space south Hb Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Please stop building more homes with these spaces. Huntington doesn't need more homes. We need spaces for the coolest people (kiddos)in our communities to play team sports and enjoy their childhoods in this city. It's bad enough that housing complex was built right next to Seaview instead of developing a radical extension of the park there. Sincerely. Chris miller HB resident and coach for AYSO and SEAVIEW little league (562)533-3323 Sent from my Whone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION MoOng Data: / / ?— CPf oa/ 1 AgMMa ram No •?7LOP? t Estanislau, Robin From: Lori Schimmenti <bchdoll7@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 1S, 2021 3:26 PM To: supplementaIcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Save our fields!! Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. 1 am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. My daughter R son have been a part of AYSO for several years now and have always practiced at Gisler field. They've had soccer test there. I ask you, if this field is no longer there. where will they practice??They've had a hard enough year with covid, please don't take awav their soccer field. Sincerely. Lori, sky larX oven Schimmenti Sent from my Whone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mm6V Date. Agenda IR3m No.. .. .. . 1 Moore, Tania From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 1:45 PM To: Agenda Alerts; supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Gisler soccer field From: arnaud bougard <abougard@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 1:38 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler soccer field Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. AYSO soccer has been essential to my daughter's development as a soccer player and a person. My daughter has been playing soccer for region 56 for 8 years now. Started off as a rec player and is now playing for their top flight U13 extra team. It would be very sad to see them loose a field without it being replaced. Sincerely, Arnaud Bougard SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION MM*V Dale:. )T)1 it i 1 �1 \ 4gerMa Item No.z t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 4:58 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Gisler (Brethren Christian) Fields From:Jim Smith<jps@jpsdesignsbuild.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 4:35 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy <CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL <city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; nocleugh@hotmail.com Subject: Gisler(Brethren Christian) Fields City Council- Please consider saving the soccer fields at Gisler. The local family's/kids have used the fields for years and continue to do so. Our fields are precious to us and we are running out of options locally for soccer fields. Not to mention, these fields are the only fields around with lights....developing them is unacceptable. Concerned resident of 57 years of South HB.... 'The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten."—Benjamin Franklin James P Smith President/Founder JPS Designs/Division 1 Construction DBA JP5 Designs +Build JPS@jpsdesignsbuild.com General Contractors License #986010 www.IP sdesgsbuild.com 120Industrial Way Costa Mesa, CA 92627 C. 949.254.6106 P. 949.650.9992 F. 949.6 50.999 5 2 0 D ips SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION bfe"N Date: 101 I q 2921 DIVISION 2 CONSTRUCTION DESIGNS t B U I L Agenda Urn No.__,2r / gL I Moore, Tania From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:05 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Fields ---Original Message----- From: Erika Cleugh <erikacleugh@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:12 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Fields Hello, This Tuesday, when deciding to approve the development at the HB City School District site, please consider requiring the Developer to mitigate for the loss of the lighted fields. Losing this many lighted fields will be a massive loss to the quality of life in Huntington Beach. Keep kids off the streets and promote a healthy safe community by requiring AT LEAST in-kind mitigation. The school district has already offered to look into the possibility of lighting fields at Dwyer and behind the new HBCSD office, so consider requiring both site be paid for by the developer. Thank you, Erika SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meetkq Date: I r-) 1 ao"-1 agenda ram No.: ';I-? Moore, Tania From: Frakes, Sandie Sent Monday, October 18, 2021 8:10 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc Fikes, Cathy Subject FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Josh Kroese<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Sunday, October 17,2021 5:08 PM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@su rfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>;CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/17/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach Meeting Do* joIW ton 1 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Agend.Vern No.: RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. I We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Josh Kroese ioshkroese(aUtmail.com (714) 306-4683 21172 Lockhaven Circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:10 AM To: Agenda Alerts cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Jillian Kroese<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Sunday,October 17,20215:00 PM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com gp Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler id�IgLEMENTAL 10/17/2021 COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council Alaetlrp - 9 j-�Oar City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 N° `� "? RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Lillian Kroese Jillvbean 14(a,email.com (714) 785-5641 21172 Lockhaven circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 i Moore, Tania From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:10 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Victor Dworak<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Sunday,October 17, 2021 1:18 PM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/17/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council : Inl f�l���al City of Huntington Beach MeWV 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Agenda Iwrn hb.: '2 3r2 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. t We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Victor Dworak vdworak(a4socal.rr.com (714)962-4395 21161 Richmond Circle HUNTINGTON BEACH, California 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:10 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Luci Schofield <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Sunday, October 17,2021 1:03 PM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surf city-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property SUPPLEMENTAL loii�no2t COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council DoW f OJ e9/4na/ City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Agenda ftm Nm. RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. r We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Luci Schofield luci schofieldwahoo.com (714) 943-2272 21121 Lockhaven Circle, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:10 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: AYSO - --Original Message----- From: Tumbellina L<volcomgirlhb@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 6:44 AM To: CITY COUNCIL <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: AYSO Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. [Add a sentence about your family and what AYSO has meant, how many years your child played, if you participated, etc.) Sincerely, Tumbellina Thank you! AYSO Region 56 Looking forward to baking for you. Sent from Tumbellina's iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee*V Date: I n I I Gl 1 a09 I 1 Agendo IMrn him: 97 t Moore, Tania From: Christian Sullivan <euforic1@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 4:12 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential project Dear Mayor Cart and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Sincerely, Christian Sullivan Thank you! AYSO Region 56 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ► e tV Dole:_ 4l g l2 AW4e hem no.; 1 $ t Moore, Tania From: Craig Stout <cbstout70@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 4:26 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org;CITY COUNCIL Subject: Region 56 Soccer Fields Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, 1 am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over) and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. I have a 19 year old son who played on these fields and went on to play soccer at Boise State University. I am currently coaching my 9 year old's team on these same fields. In addition my wife and myself both grew up playing here as well. As a family we have cultivated many amazing friendships through youth sports. These kids have had too much taken from them in the last two years and this would be another huge blow to their development. Sincerely, Craig Stout SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ►Aee*ig Dab: OI lq l.�a Ap nds IMn ft a - t Moore, Tania From: Marcus Ginnaty <mginnaty@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 5:11 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL Cc: Natasha Ginnaty; Dad; Cole Ginnaty Subject: SAVE Youth sports fields in South HB - stop stripping park space Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my grave concern over the loss of youth sports field space. I grew up playing youth sports in South HB. and as an adult have coached and watched my sons play youth sports. primarily soccer, on those very same fields. I'm a South HB resident and regular voter For decades. South HB has lost youth sports fields to school closures and subsequent land sales to developers Losing the Gisler fields will be devastating to families in this area The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to AYSO and to our neighborhoods Gisler is currently the only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and the only site with lights Without this field and the lights. many teams will find it hard, if not impossible. to practice. Protect what makes HB great - providing an amazing place for families to raise their children. At a minimum, the city should support and assure funding for lights at another field site. I also ask the City to make a commitment to youth sports and add soccer fields at Edison Park and identify other places for the youth sports fields that have been lost over the last 20 years Sincerely, Marcus Ginnaty South HB resident Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Met tlft Dab: 16l q I Aoende rwn No. - 71$ Moore, Tania From: brandinbryan@socal,rr.com Sent: Friday, October 15. 2021 8:20 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Gisler Residential project Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, 1 am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports,they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U 14 and over)and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible,to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. Having the larger fields with lights for weekday games or practices helps our community. These fields keep teenagers and preteens busy and out of trouble. Please don't take this away from Huntington Beach! Sincerely, Brandi Kramer SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: a I Agenda ftm No.;.2 t Moore, Tania From: Alyssa Chapman <alyssaj87@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 9:31 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: CITY COUNCIL Subject: AYSO soccer fields Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields(U14 and over) and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. I grew up in HB and played AYSO as a child. Over my 34 years here they have gotten rid of many soccer fields with empty promises of more to replace them. Playing soccer created so many wonderful memories and friendships. My children and others deserve that same opportunity. City council, do the right thing for once and don't get rid of anymore fields. Sincerely, Alyssa Chapman Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION McS&V Date:_ I Iq��3! 1 Agenda bm No.: t Moore, Tania From: Martinez Mario <mmcolonial@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 9:48 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Gisler Residential project Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U 14 and over) and our only site with lights Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park As a long time HB resident and having raised one child into adulthood and working on our 2nd. I can truly attest to how important parks and the youth sports that leverage them are My recent high school graduate participated in multiple youth sports before focusing on baseball. and eventually earning a scholarship in that sport We spent many enjoyable hours on local fields practicing skills and developing life long friendships Youth sports is the difference between being a city or a community In a community barriers are removed and you have both children and parents interacting that otherwise would not have met I have called youth sports the true melting pot of the community where minorities majorities and everything in between get thrown together and learn to all cheer together for a common team The failure to retain Gisler, or provide a suitable replacement will have a detrimental effect on this wonderful city we all call home If youth sports disappear from our landscape we will be destined to turn into the sterile environment where children only play with the same kids they go to school with parent interaction will be minimal, and our sense of community will disappear Thank you in advance for your consideration on this matter Sincerely, Mario Martinez 25 year resident SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mae&V Dote: 16 Za a'! ��Agenda Nam No.: I' t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 10,33 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Sharon Crowther<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday,October 18, 20219:50 AM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize @surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/18/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council Mee*V Date: InlIQ City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 AgerWe tam No.�o7Y' (�21 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed,the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. t We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Sharon Crowther slccrowther4�mail.com (714) 270-6149 21191 Richmond Circle Huntington Beach, California 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 10:33 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Terry Crowther<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday,October 18, 20219:59 AM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property SUPPLEMENTAL 10n9n021 COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council Meelkq Deb: laJ Iq J;30;2 I City of Huntington Beach Main Street Hunt ��bm No.. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes. potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Terry Crowther Tem a ticrowther.com (949)422-0476 21191 Richmond Ciy Huntingon Beach, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 2:54 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: Gisler Residential Project Letter Attachments: Genovese letter re Gisler.docx From: Brian Genovese<briangrealty@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,October 18, 20212:53 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Gisler Residential Project Letter Good afternoon, Please find attached my letter to the city council in support of the Gisler School project listed as Item #27 on the agenda.Thanks for your attention. Sincerely, Brian Genovese Click here to Calculate your Home Value ! Brian Genovese Realtor DreamForce Real Estate Ducm (714)69(-9`2123 Lic# 01930733 Brkr# 02088410 2021 Chair-F7ect- Fountain Valley Chamber of Commerce 2021 Director- Fountain Valley Schools Foundation SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION 2020-21 President- Fountain Valley Kiwanis tdeelkq DaM: 2021 Member LGRN Committee , Orange County Association of Realtors r 7s ,f y4e-e oo oo ref( l co rr�l oa 6rnied a� �uiri� wew6er �ar t�ei��tia+�ar ~104 (e 'e'ar October 18, 2021 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach CA Sent via e-mail: City.Council(a surfcity-hb.org Hearing RE:Gisler School Property Dear Council Members: I would like to offer my support for Brookfield Residential's plans for the Gisler school project. This new neighborhood of homes will undoubtedly improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood, remove potential blight and homeless issues, and ultimately help to increase neighboring property values. The real estate industry has gone through many changes over the last several years. Buyer demand, seller objectives, and overall market analysis are constantly changing and affecting the way home builders plan their new communities. Brookfield's plan for homes is a good fit for this part of Huntington Beach. As a Huntington Beach resident I will appreciate new housing and this improvement to the neighborhood will also increase the resale value of adjacent properties. I hope you agree and approve this plan when it comes before you. Sincerely, Brian Genovese Moore, Tania From: Kim Mitchell <kim.pavloff@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 4:03 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org, CITY COUNCIL Subject: Edison Park Soccer Fields Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods Gisler is currently our only site with full-size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights Without this field and the lights. many teams will find it hard if not impossible. to practice We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park My son has a learning disability and goes to a special school in Tustin Soccer has been a great outlet for him physically, emotionally, and socially The soccer program is one of the few opportunities he has to make friends locally He has played now for 4 years and loves the friendships he has made As a parent. I love how he learning what it means to be a team player, how to play with good sportsmanship, and gets him outside moving. Please help make sure we can continue this great program locally Sincerely, Kim Mitchell SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Me *V Da%:�C) lx)o Agenda Ibm No.; c�,4 7 18 Moore, Tania From: Danuta Cloes <danutacloes@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 9:20 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: SAVE AYSO - Gisler Residential Project Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park I grew up playing AYSO and my son is now playing I have two more kids that will soon be old enough to play AYSO as well The technical and social skills character building, and friends made through AYSO have been so impactful on our son. and without a doubt will be for our other children as well. Community facilities help make a community great. With the number of families in Huntington Beach it is unimaginable that a city with our wealth would be unable to provide proper facilities for youth programs I understand developments happen, but I implore the city council to therefore act on providing other lighting options to our other sports fields This is the next logical step Thank you for your consideration Sincerely. Danuta C Ices SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meetkrq Dam: iolrq �ao 2l Agenda Hem No.• t Moore, Tania From: Matt Hammer <matt.m.hammer@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 9:48 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL Subject: Gisler Residential Project Dear Mayor Carr and the Huntington Beach City Council, I am writing regarding the Gisler Residential project and my concern around the loss of youth sports field space and the impact to our community. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for AYSO soccer and South Huntington Beach Girls Softball. These fields are essential and imperative to youth sports programs and the overall community of Huntington Beach. The Gisler field is the only school in our area for full sized soccer games and lights. Without these lights it will make it challenging if not impossible to hold practices. We are writing to ask the City of Huntington Beach to support and assure funding for a lighted youth sports field. Along with asking the city to make a commitment to youth sports by adding soccer fields to Edison Park and pursuing an overall development of the park to support AYSO and South Huntington Beach Softball (only all girls sports league in South East Huntington Beach). I have personally coached and our children have played in AYSO Region 56 since 2016. The Gisler fields will always hold a special spot in our hearts- it is where the great community event Soccer Fest was held annually and it was on these fields my daughter scored her first goal. Please think about the current situation and the future generation of kids who will play on these fields. Establish a legacy and make the right choice and ensure lights, fields, and green space are available for youth sports in South East Huntington Beach. Thank you for your Consideration, Matt and Heather Hammer Huntington Beach Residences since 2012 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ,1eetlryf Date: In I C1 l oroa-( Benda Item No.: off? 621 t Moore, Tania From: Pierre N <hbtwinsl 5@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 10:25 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; Carr, Kim; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike; Delgleize, Barbara; Moser, Natalie, Fikes, Cathy, Bolourchi, Farhad; Kalmick, Dan Subject: Gisler Park Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports. they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard, if not impossible to practice We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park Our sons are both in first grade and this is their first year playing AYSO soccer Our family enjoys the camaraderie with the other families and being able to play a sport where everyone participates and plays Please do what you can to preserve access to these fields for youth sports Sincerely, Pierre N. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: IDl)CI Agenda ram No., 2 t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:07 PM To: Agenda Alerts CC: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Madeline Luther<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday,October 18,2021 7:06 PM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL ccity.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/18/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council I1�G A lao� r City of Huntington Beach Meewp per: 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Aoltrla.ftm W-Z-42r- a1� RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. t We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Madeline Luther Madzmama22^&ctmai Lco m (714) 580-4685 21082 Chubasco In Huntington beach, Ca 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:43 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Michael Jackson <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:32 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property SUPPLEMENTAL 10/18/2021 COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council MaeNrtp Deb: [),-�l City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 AQW48 hem?60 . n RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Michael Jackson relaxinj acksonhb(a.vahoo.com (949) 212-4526 21181 Chubasco Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:43 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: stephanie Gilbert <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday,October 18, 2021 7:36 PM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/19/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach Dab: 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Agenda ram No. g RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed,the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, stephanie Gilbert stephanie ei 12000(&yahoo.com (949)631-6131 21111 Chubasco Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:43 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: David Gilbert <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 7:37 PM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler!tdIkcE-M" A'L 10/18/2021 COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council McW&V Date: 10 J Iq I�o31 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street AprW@ hem No- P9�I -�f g� Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. t We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, David Gilbert shampoosalowd,sunai I.com (949)285-0211 21111 Chubasco Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:15 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Gerald Phillips<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday,October 18,2021 8:01 PM To: Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/18/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council � �p City of Huntington Beach Mee�np Date: /�//-5 2 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Gerald Phillips gp.do/a verizon.net (310) 508-6516 21052 CHUBASCO LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-6426 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:16 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Charles Gilmore<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:01 PM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/18/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council y„� �� �D�j9�aDa / City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street / Huntington Beach, CA 92648 AgwAs ram No:- �/ - 7/&) RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Charles Gilmore cegilmorel�&,amail.com (714)421-1011 9511 Orient Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 8:16 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Janet Gilmore<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday,October 18, 2021 8:04 PM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>;CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/18/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach Mesll Deb: �011q/Cbo 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Apmde IYm No.: a? (�/ 8) RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Fortner Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally. funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Janet Gilmore gilmoreianet54^¢smai Lcom 9511 Orient Dr Hunktington Beach, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Jeremy Snider <jeremy.sniderca@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:19 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential fo Whom It May Concern, 1 am writing to strongly urge the City Council not to approve the development of residential housing at Gisler Elementary when and until funding is set-aside for the installation of lights at another field site, such at Edison Park. The School field sites, including Gisler, are our youth's only fields in South East Huntington Beach, and they are imperative to youth sports and our neighborhoods. In addition, Gisler is our only site with full size fields (1.114 and over) and LIGHTS. I ask the Council to hold off on voting until more investigation can be performed. Thank you, Jeremy Snider, Esq. 20332 Tidepool Circle,#102 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION t oWV Date: Z a/ a23 Agw>d•Ihm No., t Moore, Tania From: Jason Fairchild <jrfairch@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:47 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: lisa Fairchild Subject: Former Brethren Site HB City Council, My name is Jason Fairchild. I am a neighbor to the future development at the former Brethren Christian site as well as a father of three children who benefit from the lighted fields at the current site. While I am glad to avoid multi- family home development at the property, I am absolutely devastated by the City's decision to sell and develop this site especially the loss of the fields. I purchased my home backing the school nine years ago and a major part of the decision was being next to an open field. I enjoy weekends, waking up year round to the sounds of youth sports and the cheers of children and parents. I enjoy the breeze that comes across the field and brings in the smell of freshly cut grass. I enjoy watching Osprey and hawks sitting on top of the field lights, looking for prey in the fields below. Most importantly, I enjoy having a place near my home, where my children can benefit from outdoor recreation. This development will decrease my home value to me whether or not it changes the financial value of the home.The field and the use by AYSO has been instrumental my children's health and wellbeing. My children have grown up playing soccer and baseball here, taking walks, playing with our new puppy, exploring, and watching wildlife. It has become even more important to have this outdoor space, as we attempt to navigate a pandemic and the costs and fears of isolation and social distance. It saddens me greatly that the city of Huntington Beach, continues to develop without the addition of large open spaces and recreation areas for our children. We love the beach, and are ever thankful for that large open space. But as far as parks and fields, the City of Huntington Beach pales in comparison to the parks and recreation areas of other OC cities like Irvine, Mission Viejo, San Clemente, Newport Beach. With the exception of Central Park, the parks in Huntington Beach lack imagination and creativity. The fact that you are proposing to build homes over the only full size, lighted Soccer Fields that are available to AYSO, in South East Huntington Beach (SEHB) indicates that the council values the dollar over the development of youth and public health. This city is already overpopulated. The crowds, traffic, and schools have all been maxed out. You should be opening more schools and providing smaller class size. Not closing and selling schools to build more housing. The City should develop more open spaces for families to gather and neighbors to build relationships. The city has lost the sense of community that used to be here. My wife is a life long resident of Huntington Beach and she has been a witness to the demise of the city. Even LeBard park, in the neighborhood she grew up in, has become a casualty to developers. The city is not better off having shrunk that site down, pushing people into the neighborhoods for parking. When will it stop? Please take the opportunity now to say no to overdevelopment. Or at a minimum, please develop some other SEHB place for our children to play, for families to gather, for people to walk their dogs, and for the health and wellbeing of your current constituents. Thank you for your consideration. SUPPLEMENTAL Jason Fairchild COMMUNICATION 21111 Red Jacket Circle Mea*V Dalai: q �L� ��,`/ Huntington Beach, CA 92646 !+� PPS ""`-_------- Agenda bm No.' a� /F 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9A5 AM To: Agenda Alerts; Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Denise Phillips<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 20218:33 PM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <E ri k.Peterson @su rfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 1 on 8/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council /�/ �/ City of Huntington Beach AMerAttO ,0 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 Apntde IYm No.;- RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington t Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Denise Phillips drphillipsl0 a verizon.net (562) 708-6364 21052 Chubasco Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6426 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:46 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: Gisler Park From: Pierre N <hbtwins15@gmai1.com> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 10:25 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity- hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie<Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy <CFikes@surfcity- hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler Park Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members. I am writing in regards to the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports, they are imperative to our AYSO program and to our neighborhoods. Gisler is currently our only site with full size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights Without this field and the lights many teams will find it hard if not impossible, to practice We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site We are also asking the City to make a commitment to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park Our sons are both in first grade and this is their first year playing AYSO soccer Our family enjoys the camaraderie with the other families and being able to play a sport where everyone participates and plays Please do what you can to preserve access to these fields for youth sports Sincerely Pierre N SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee11r1g Ag.nde urn No.; 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:46 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Susanna Prentice<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:26 AM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/19/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council stln ,��'a � City of Huntington Beach Mep :I�T'ao'- 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 A9snd4 Iwm�.• a (off 1 g RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Susanna Prentice srprenticena earthlink.net (714)%3-9115 21191 Chubasco Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:47 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes. Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: penny hardisty<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday,October 19, 2021 6:33 AM To: Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <E ri k.Peterson@ surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property SUPPLEMENTAL 10/19/2021 COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council Me*V Deb: Inl I q � a City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 A9ende IMm No., �$ RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. r We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, penny hardisty plhardistyna gmail.com (714) 519-5013 21171 Chubasco Lane Huntington Beach, California 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:47 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: DAVID BREWER 1R <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:52 AM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/19/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach Meetlnp Deb:_ 1O�IJeb g/ 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity,the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington t Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, DAVID BREWER JR tunaanglerrd',hotmail.com 21141 CHUBASCO LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:47 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From:Teri Jackson<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday,October 19, 20217:59 AM To: Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <E ri k.Peterson@ surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad<farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/19/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach MWWV Dab: /1) bg k;lv) 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ApMKi,IMm No.: 22 62L ZZI0) RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community, on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Teri Jackson terirapozo(a yahoo.com 21181 Chubasco Lane Huntington Beach, Ca 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 9:48 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Mark Himmelstein<no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:25 AM To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda<Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Pete rson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kai mick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property SUPPLEMENTAL lon9i2o21 COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach irlee*V Dab: lni IQ IraI 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Aprde bm No.. RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: 1 support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. t We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Mark Himmelstein markhimmelstein57nq,gmai l.com (714)969-3184 6166 Femwood Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2 Moore, Tania From: Ketrin Adam <oketrin@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 10:51 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential I o Whom It May Concern, I am a parent and resident of Huntington Beach, California. I spent my summers in Huntington Beach as a child and am now proud as an adult to be raising my kids here. I have a 7byear old son and twin 3 year old daughters who play youth sports in Huntington Beach. Currently Gisler is the only site in Huntington Beach with full- size fields (U14 and over) and has LIGHTS to play in the evening, which is important considering the days are getting shorter and the lights are getting longer. I know schools open/close depending on the numbers of kids, but they are vitally important to ensure our kids have open land to play sports on. PLEASE support and assure funding for full-size soccer fields and lights at another field site(possibly Edison Park?). 1 have very energetic kids and the ability for them to run around outside year-round is one of the reasons why I picked Southern California, and Huntington Beach specifically, to raise my family. Youth sports are critical to development - please ensure our kids have access to them now and for years to come. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Ketrin Adam 20241 Everglades Lane cell: 213-400-8061 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION trW*V Deft: 1119 f�o�l A96nds ftm No.: 22 7r,?) t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 11:13 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: Proposed Residential Community at Gisler From: Jeff Naber<jeffnabe@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 10:54 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed Residential Community at Gisler Dear Mayor Carr: I am a resident and homeowner in Huntington Beach. I want to share that I support Brookfield Residential's proposed plans for homes at Gisler. I believe that revitalizing this property with new homes will not only enhance the neighborhood aesthetically, but will also increase retail sales of surrounding businesses,creating economic vitality and new job opportunities for the area. The new residents from this community will shop and dine locally,contributing to the retail sales tar base and helping to support local businesses. After the last year and a half,our local businesses could use the additional customers. Please approve the plans for Gisler. It will be good for the city and our local economy. Thank you. Sincerely. JetTNaber SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meelkv Date:-d I C1 I`tea 1gende Um No.---,-? t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 11:13 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: Gisler property Meeting 10/19/21 -----Original Message----- From: Maria Spurgeon <maria.spurgeon3@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 10:56 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Gisler property Meeting 10/19/21 Dear City Council, I am unable to attend the meeting tonight but would like to share my endorsement of the Brookfield proposal for the Gisler site. I live on Strathmoor Lane right across from the old school so I'm on the "front line" so to speak. It was nice to have Brethren Christian school there but it was understandable they chose not to renew their lease. The facility is too old and expensive to update and HBCSD obviously needed to sell the valuable land. The obvious choice for the reuse of this site is to build homes that will blend into our neighborhood and maintain the "vibe" that we have here so close to Edison High School and the beach. Brookfield has been open and transparent with their designs and I appreciate how they have included all of us in their plans. Having beautiful homes fill that space is a good solution. No school or church is going to take over that building and the school district can't be expected to maintain a vacant building. While I'm not looking forward to the disruptions of construction, I realize this abandoned school will be torn down no matter who takes over this land. Therefore I fully support Brookfield and their proposals to build 85 homes because it will add value to the neighborhood and I feel they have established a good relationship with us these past 2 years which makes me confident going forward. Please vote in favor of this proposal. Thank you for all you do as our elected representatives for this great city. Regards, Darrin and Maria Spurgeon Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION %15eting Date: Ib jig Jvba noenda Item No.: a3 62 r- I/g) t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 11:14 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Ron Pascual <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 11:13 AM To:Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>;gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/19/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council Alleetlrq /�/fA/� � City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Agenille Yam No.. RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of qualit% homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. I We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Ron Pascual ron Pascual�d,emai I.com (714)423-9500 19122 Callaway Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:46 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Joyce Endo <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:15 PM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/19/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach Milli p Dol 1r)hg1, ba-1 2000 Main Street \\ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 AgwdB Nam RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City Councilmembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. r We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Joyce Endo oyce(a'�joviceendo.com Huntington Beach,CA 92648 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sett Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:47 PM To: Agenda Alerts cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject FW: General Plan Amendment for 21141 Strathmoor Lane SUPPLEMENTAL From: MH <halligan.michelle@gmail.com> COMMUNICATION Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:41 PM �/ To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> ► ee*V DoW Subject: General Plan Amendment for 21141 Strathmoor Lane Dear City Councilmembers: Agenda "No' As a Huntington Beach resident and professional community planner, I am concerned that the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) process is incomplete and the City's findings for approval could be too weak to support the General Plan Amendment for 21141 Strathmoor Lane ("subject property"). The Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) public comment period only lasted 20 days instead of 30, which is atypical for a General Plan Amendment. I also could not find this project in the OPR State Clearinghouse. During the public hearing, please have the project CEQA consultant thoroughly explain how a General Plan Amendment/regionally significant project was allowed to benefit from a shortened public comment period and why the MND was not filed with the Office of Planning and Research Clearinghouse. Hopefully 1 am mistaken and all of the required procedures were property executed. Unfortunately the suggested findings for approval are lacking. The subject property is a major opportunity for the City of Huntington Beach to provide a mix of housing types, densities, and range of affordability. The proposed designation, Residential Low Density(up to 6.23 units per net acre)does not readily accommodate the following: • Residential development that is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Huntington Beach has a substantial single-family detached housing stock. The community needs more small lot, attached, and multi-family products to provide a variety of housing options, rental opportunities, and affordability levels. The subject property may be critical to addressing the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and the ability of the youth of today to reside in Huntington Beach as adults. • New development that supports the protection and maintenance of open space resources. The proposed Residential Low Density designation would spread out homes over the site, rather than concentrating homes in a portion of the site and preserve a large open space. Current Huntington Beach residents cherish the existing athletic fields. Residential development should be focused in one portion of the site to preserve athletic fields for the kids of today and future generations. Once developed with sprawling homes(proposed lots up to 9,241 square feet), we cannot "regrow" athletic fields. The staff report states that the applicant would provide lights for an existing athletic field at a school property to-be- determined. Perry and other school sites are also expected to be sold for development in the near future. The location of the future athletic fields should be stated in the staff report, resolutions, and Development Agreement. A condition of approval should be added that identifies the location of the 1 athletic field(s) and prohibits them to be redeveloped (a Restrictive Covenant would be filed with the County of Orange Clerk-Recorder). • A range of housing types to meet the diverse economic. physical. and social needs of future and existing residents. The proposed Residential Low Density designation is not a dynamic use allowing a wide range of housing product types nor facilitating various affordability levels. The zoning amendment findings refer to three architectural styles. not three densities. three product types, or three affordability levels. The proposed density is up to 6.23 units per net acre with lot sizes ranging from 4,661 to 9.241 square feet. Why not allow smaller lots as well as condominiums and townhomes to meet a broad range of needs and preserve desperately needed open space? • Reduce potential governmental constraints to housing production and affordability. Re-designating the property from Public-Semipublic underlying Residential Low Density to Residential Low Density does not remove an actual governmental constraint. Some examples of governmental constraints with regards to housing development include discretionary, design review, restrictive low density zoning, requiring a vote of the public to upzone, etc. In summation, please ensure the proposed project complies with all CEQA requirements and that the findings for approval are accurate. Should the proposed project be denied. it would be prudent for the developer to rethink the Residential Low Density designation in favor of concentrating development in one area of the subject property through a medium density use or a more dynamic designation. This would allow more open space to be preserved for public use; benefiting everyone in Huntington Beach. A smaller lot and attached development approach could also avoid potential complications related to Senate Bill 9. 1 encourage the City Council and any opponents to attached and multifamily housing types to research Senate Bill 9 and other recent housing laws. California's cities have been tasked with complying with numerous new housing laws. \loving forward. it appears that cities will have more local control over attached and multifamily designations than over low density ones. Keep doing your best for Huntington Beach! Regards, Michelle Halligan 2 Moore, Tania From: Teri Haddon <Teri@crowncustom.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 1:36 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Loss of Lighted fields at Gisler Dear City Council, After reading an article in the Daily Pilot detailing the loss of the only lit fields for AYSO in south Huntington Beach, I couldn't help but wonder"How did this happen?" I was saddened by the lack of forethought on the impact the sale of the Gisler property would have on kids in the community. My children are now adults however both had the benefit of meeting under these lights for practices for several years. Why is this just getting the attention it deserves?Why wouldn't there have been a plan to look at how the community was currently using the property and make sure that concessions were made so that those same recreational activities could be accommodated elsewhere? I have never been one to complain about development, I do however feel that the impact of this should have been a priority as keeping kids in programs such as AYSO contributes greatly to the strength and wellness of the community. Current statistics pointing toward declining physical fitness levels and widespread adolescent depression should be a clear indicator of just how important it is that we do all that we can to keep youth sports programs strong. I ask the Huntington Beach city council to please take a closer look and come up with a plan to secure well needed lit recreational space. If it's too late to reconsider changes with regard to Gisler, please consider other accessible options for south Huntington Beach families. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Teri Haddon SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeft Debt: I O11 q Do 2l Ape . mNo.-nd IY t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 1:59 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: Support for Gisler Homes From: Kenny Hesse <khssy@sbcglobal.net> Sent:Tuesday, October 19, 2021 1:52 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Support for Gisler Homes Dear Mayor Carr: We live nearby the Gisler school neighborhood. We enjoy living in Huntington Beach and cherish the Surf City lifestvle. Recreation is a part of our daily life and we are dedicated to supporting all recreational activities. Although we are sad to see the fields at Gisler go with the development of new homes, we understand that the property is not open space. We hope the developer,the city and the school district can work with AYSO to find alternatives to this loss. In the meantime, we support new homes taking the place of an abandoned school that brings nothing but trouble to the neighborhood in its current state. 'There is no other clear choice to this plan. The city did not offer to purchase the land for park space, probably because they don't have funds for park space right now. If there isn't going to he another school and there isn't money to create a park, the logical solution is homes. I'm just happy they are proposing a low-density project. Please approve this plan now while we still have the chance to keep it low-density. Thank you. Ken Hesse SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION +Fwffng Date: I Q 1 �oenda Item No.; (02 I J t Gisler Residential Project City of Huntington Beach City Council Meeting October 19. 2021 - - I IIUIN� U IEI 111,TI Illl l 6�.�:_: W ;Zug. - i. t Brookfield SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION M..wlo o.�.: col►q �2�� Gisler Residential Project / 85 Single Family Homes Aprft bm KIPP `i » sss�ce�e r STIIffT 4111�140 • • ♦ • �� A,b . • �1 Brookfield Gisler Residential Project Architectural Elevations �Y ImoR ARE 7 All n. 1r Brookfield Gisler Park — Existing Improvements 1 y � Brookfield L Gisler Park — Future Improvements _ t Brookfield .9.aY'a.,,a +Mar7 -"Doer r Thank you. TTTTTT T -- _ IIIIIIIlolilllliil {I{1j�1 $flTZ, Brookfield Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19. 2021 9:58 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: Letter of Support - HBCSD Gisler Sale Attachments: Letter to City Council.pdf From:Jimmy Lambos<jlambos@hbcsd.us> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:17 AM To: CITY COUNCIL <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Letter of Support - HBCSD Gisler Sale Good afternoon, Attached is a letter on behalf of the district in regards to the Gisler residential land sale. Thank you Jimmy Lambos Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Huntington Beach City School District 8750 Dorsett Dr. I Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ilambos&hbcsd us 1 714-378-2011 Website I Twitter I Facebook `_ Statement of Confidentiality This message and any attachments may contain confidential information It is solely for the use of the intended recipient If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you received this email in error The information may also be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any use. review, disclosure. reproduction distribution copying of. or reliance on this email and any attachment is strictly prohibited If you are not the intended recipient. please immediately notify the sender by reply email and delete this message and any attachments Thank you for your cooperation Email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521 and is legally privileged SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION M90V Deb: 1 UIl g d g/ AWWs Writ No. 1 /8 t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:47 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: Support for Approval of Agenda Item 27 Attachments: Letter to City Council.pdf From: Leisa Winston<Iwinston@hbcsd.us> Sent:Tuesday,October 19,2021 12:38 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Chi, Oliver<oliver.chi@surfcity-hb.org>; Hopkins,Travis<thopkins@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Support for Approval of Agenda Item 27 Dear Mayor Carr and City Council Members, Last week, we sent the attached letter in support of approval of Agenda Item 27 on your agenda for this evening. 1 want to reiterate that we continue to work closely with Brookfield, AYSO, and City staff to address the concern regarding field space. Huntington Beach City School District is a committed partner in this process. The District already provides low facility use fees, which have not increased since 2011. We currently charge AYSO about S2.50 per hour to use our fields, which does not cover our operational costs(utilities, mowing the fields, etc.). We continue to discuss improvements to alternative fields with AYSO and Brookfield, most recently at Dwyer Middle School and Smith Elementary. I wish that I could attend the meeting and speak to you all in person, however, we have a Board meeting this evening, during which the Board will consider approval of either modernization or reconstruction of Sowers Middle School. The funds from the sale of Gisler will be critical to the District in either scenario to create the same 21st-century learning environments at Sowers Middle School that are present or in process in the rest of HBCSD schools. A staff member and long-time Huntington Beach resident. Jolene Miller, will represent HBCSD and speak to you this evening during public comment about this important project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Leisa Winston, Ed.D. Superintendent SUPPLEMENTAL Huntington Beach City School District 8750 Dorsett Dr. I Huntington Beach. CA 92646 COMMUNICATION we/ lwnstonLd:hbcsdWeiteITitte us ceboo 4-8888 Websde I Twdter I Facelwok Mee*V DWA: anPnde hwn No.: t BOARD OF TRUSTEES HUNTINGTON BEACH Bridget Kaub•Shari Kowalke CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Diana Marks • Paul Morrow, Ed.D. •Ann Sullivan Superintendent: Leisa Winston, Ed.D. October 8, 2021 Mayor Kim Carr, Mayor Pro Tempore Barbara Delgleize Members of the Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: SUPPORT FOR THE APPROVAL OF GISLER SCHOOL—CONVERSION TO RESIDENTIAL LAND USE As the City is aware, the Huntington Beach City School District (District) is in escrow to sell the Gisler Middle School site property to Brookfield. As the dynamics of student generation and demographics shift, surplus property revenue has become critical to our ongoing improvements to our facilities. Brookfield has developed a plan that is consistent with surrounding development and the single-family residential land use framework that has already been established in the neighborhood. Like other former school sites in Orange County, these locations become homes for families that generate students and property taxes, which are necessary revenue sources for the District. The proceeds from this sale will be used primarily to fund the modernization or reconstruction of Sowers Middle School and pay off some of the District's long-term debt. Some of the important benefits of these improvements include developing collaborative spaces, improving natural light, improving technology infrastructure, and most importantly, creating innovative 21st-century learning environments for our students. Without the sale of this property, the District would not have the critical funds available to implement these improvements and equitable learning environments between the District's two middle schools; Sowers and Dwyer, which has already been modernized. We recognize AYSO's interest in lighted soccer fields and appreciate our long-standing relationship, as they use the majority of our fields and we acknowledge the value that soccer provides to Huntington Beach youth. We are working with Brookfield to explore additional field options within the District. District staff are committed to working with Brookfield, which has provided funding to further study opportunities and constraints at several District locations. Brookfield has also indicated they are willing to contribute $250,000 toward a possible alternative. We are working diligently to conclude this study as soon as possible and will continue to work with all parties. The HBCSD Board of Trustees has not committed any additional funds toward an attemative lighted field. It is important to recognize that the District's core mission is to provide an educational program that supports the academic and personal development of every student, and the funds from this sale would be fully expended to improve the Sowers Middle School learning environment in support of this goal. We respectfully request the City Council to approve the project on October 19 so the District can maintain its schedule, complete the transaction and close escrow in the next few months. Sincerely, Leisa Winston, Ed.D. Superintendent 8750 Dorsett Drive Huntington Beach California 92646 (714) 964-8688 Estanislau, Robin From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 2:52 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: OCBC Support for Gisler Development Project Attachments: Gisler Site Development-Support-Huntington Beach City Council.pdf From: Jennifer Ward <jward@ocbc.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 2:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: cfikes@sufcity-hb.org; Ramos, Ricky<rramos@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: OCBC Support for Gisler Development Project Good Afternoon Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers, On behalf of OCBC, I'm pleased to express our support for the proposed Brookfield Residential housing development at the former Gisler school site property. Please see our letter attached for more information. Thank you! Jennifer Ward Sr. vice President of Advocacy and Government Affairs Orange County Business Council 2 Park Plaza. Suite 100 1 Irvine, CA 92614 C: 530.219.1845 1 0:949.794.7215 1 iwardsocbc.ora RESILIENT fC BUSINESS COUNCIL THE LE4OINC VOICE OF BUSINESS www.ocbc.ora and www.LocafionOC.com SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION moo" Date: /9-e?o�,/fi 4gerxln tiorn t CCC ORANGE COUNTY BUSINESS COUNCIL 2 Park Plaza Suite 100 I Irvine CA 92614 I P 949 476 2242 1 F 949 476 0443 1 www ocbc org October 12, 2021 The Honorable Kim Carr Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92646 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposed New Homes at Gisler Site - SUPPORT Dear Mayor Carr Orange County Business Council (OCBC). the leading voice of business in Orange County, is pleased to support Brookfield Residential's proposal to build much-needed housing at the former Gisler school property. One of OCBC s core initiatives is to advocate for the development of new housing to meet the current and future needs of Orange County s diverse workforce. OCBC's research on Orange County's housing needs includes the 2019-20 Workforce Housing Scorecard. which identifies an existing 58.000-unit shortfall countywide—which is expected to balloon to 114,000 units by 2045 without significant action. Employees of local Huntington Beach businesses especially benefit from new housing opportunities, as they must otherwise commute to work from other cities within or outside of Orange County increasing congestion and preventing them from living where they work Brookfield s proposal to add to the City s housing supply by reusing the former Gisler school site helps address the need for housing for numerous demographics This low- density project provides opportunities for residents with growing families and empty nesters alike to find a new home, freeing their current residences for others looking for a "move-up' opportunity. In addition to new tax revenue and economic development impacts, this proposal will also bring in new jobs during construction and new customers for local businesses. OCBC respectfully asks the City Council to approve this development based on the numerous. invaluable benefits it will offer to residents the surrounding business community and the City of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Jennifer Ward Senior Vice President of Advocacy and Government Affairs cc Councilmembers. City of Huntington Beach THE LEADING VOICE OF BUSINESS IN ORANGE COUNTY Moore, Tania From: Rachel Hepper <rachelhepper@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:03 PM To: sup plementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential • The School field sites are our only fields in SEH137 they are imperative to youth sports and our neighborhoods. Gisler is our only site with full sire fields (U 14 and over) and lights. • Please support and assure funding for lights at another field site. Please replace the only full sire fields in SEHB at another site Youth sports are important to our famih. t Moore, Tania From: Tram Bresnan <maitrammi@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:11 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler Residential To whom it may concern: Over the years and currently, my three children have been lucky enough to participate in AYSO Region 56 Soccer. This great program has provided us with opportunities to make friends with many families in the south Huntington Beach community and fostered our love for the city that we call home. I grew up in Huntington Beach and made the decision to move back here after living in the Tustin Ranch/Irvine Ranch area, where there were and are, many public spaces dedicated to youth sports facilities. Unfortunately, I have not seen that to be the case in Huntington Beach. The loss of the Gisler soccer fields will make a huge impact on AYSO Region 56 Soccer families, as it provides 2 full-sized fields and is the only one that has field lights. It is sad to me that we continue to lose opportunities to foster community connections due to the loss of public space that enables programs like AYSO Soccer to exist. As a Huntington Beach resident, I would implore the city to consider dedicating more areas of public land for the development of youth sports facilities. In a world where our children continue to have more and more time on screens, programs like AYSO Soccer provide our children with a chance to be outdoors and active. The most important aspect though, is the sense of community that these programs foster for our children in south Huntington Beach. I fear that by losing these public field spaces, we are also losing the chance to show our children the importance of being together as a community. If Gisler field can no longer be used in the future, please consider providing AYSO Reion 56 Soccer with another field space and funding for field lights. Please help youth sports to continue! Regards, Tram Bresnan (proud Huntington Beach resident) i Moore, From: bbenton955@aol.com .. October . . . COUNCIL Subject: Re Gisler Supplenuntalconun asurlit�-hb.ora: rite.cixuuilnsurlcit�-hh.ore: Dour \gavor Carr and Council i\Irmbcrs. I am ��riting in rc��ards to the Gisler Residential hroject and my concern o�er the loss of youth sports licld space. The school field sites are the only liclds in South Fast liuntin2ton Beach I��r �outh sports. they= are imprrati�c to our f\l'SO progr.nn and to our nei�_hborhoods. Gisler is ctn-rentl� our onh site ��ith full sire liclds (U 1=1 and Deer) ,uul our onl� site ��ith lights. \1'itluxrt this field and the li��hts mam_ trams ��ill find it hard. ifnot impossible. to practice. \\�r urr asking the Cin to support and assure fundin�� lix lights at another field site. \Vr arc also asking the City to make a cununiunent tv youth sports and consider adding soccer liclds at Edison Park. For the benefit of ALL of the Huntington Beach community PLEASE do not approve this project. Bonnie Benton 19961 Rothert Ln. Hleis tin ton Beach, CA 92646 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 8:00 PM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: SAVE YOUTH SPORTS FIELD SPACE! From: Brent Garza <garzabrent77@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 2:16 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:SAVE YOUTH SPORTS FIELD SPACE! Dear Mayor Carr and Council Members, I am writing about the Gisler Residential project and my concern over the loss of youth sports field space. The school field sites are the only fields in South East Huntington Beach for youth sports: they are imperative to our AYSO program and our neighborhoods. In addition, Gisler is currently our only site with full-size fields (U14 and over) and our only site with lights. Without this field and the lights, many teams will find it hard, if not impossible, to practice. We are asking the City to support and assure funding for lights at another field site. We are also asking the City to commit to youth sports and consider adding soccer fields at Edison Park. 1 grew up in Huntington Beach, playing on the same fields my two boys are currently playing. Sport has many benefits for kids. It improves physical fitness, teaches essential life skills, and increases their chances of becoming active adults. Please make the right decisions. Future generations are depending on you. Sincerely, Brent Garza t Moore, Tania From: Dyana Stone <dyanastone@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 6:04 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Gisler residential Hello HB City Council, am taking some time to write on how our children have benefited from all the wonderful parks, playgrounds and athletic fields.Also when I say children, I also mean fur kids our dogs. I am saddened to hear the Gisler field will no longer exist as kids AYSO use this field and also neighbors uses this field to meet with other neighbors and play with their dogs. We'd like to request that the City try and accommodate another field with lights if you must take away the Gisler field. We don't believe in being negative so I am positive that the HB City Council can achieve this. Let's keep HB beautiful and full of community by keeping our green parks n field for all our kids fur kids and all! Thank You, Dyana t Moore, Tania From: Kevy Daly <kevydaly@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 7:36 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Save our fields! We live in the Gisler Park track. Our daughter has been playing soccer here since she was 4. Please support us in keeping our fields! It is the only site with full size fields and lights. Sports are so very important for our kids. especially now with all the crazy on the world. These fields are used as an outlet for our lids to run around with other kids And just be themselves. If this field gets taken from us. it is imperative that we get funding for lights at another nearby field. I don't think 1 even need to explain the importance of youth sports. Thank you for listening and I hope we can figure out a way to either keep gisler or get another field set up with lights and the correct sizing. Thank you. Kevy Daly Sent from my Whone t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 9:12 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Frakes, Sandie Subject: FW: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property From: Les Card <no-reply@gislerneighborhood.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 8:58 AM To: Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolourchi, Farhad <farhad.bolourchi@surfcity-hb.org>; gislerneighborhood92646@gmail.com Subject: I Support Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property 10/20/2021 Mayor Kim Carr and Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 RE: Brookfield Residential's Proposal for the Re-Use of the Former Gisler Middle School Property Dear Mayor and City COUncillnembers: I support Brookfield Residential's proposal for a new residential community on the site of the former Gisler school property. Although Gisler Middle School was a benefit to the neighborhood and will be missed, the addition of quality homes, potential park improvements and other community-wide benefits will greatly improve the neighborhood. Additionally, funds from the sale of the property will help the school district to address much- needed facilities improvements. Over time, shuttered school sites become magnets for illicit activity, the ever-growing homeless population and blight. Revitalizing these properties as quickly as possible not only helps the neighborhood to alleviate the potential for unwanted activity, but also helps to increase nearby property values. A residential use at Gisler would bring new homes for both young adults who want to move back to their hometown and Huntington Beach families wanting to move into a larger home to accommodate their expanding families. Furthermore, providing new homes in this range helps address the current housing shortage. 1 We appreciate that Brookfield Residential is offering the opportunity for community input. As Huntington Beach residents, we have the best insight to providing solutions to meet the needs of area residents. Please approve this new neighborhood when it is brought before you. Sincerely, Les Card les.card�djsa.net (714) 329-3479 1733 La Colina Drive North Tustin, CA 92705 2