HomeMy WebLinkAboutConsider Withdrawal of Previous City Council Approval of Edi 66,vJett,,- 2-
2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach,CA
City of Huntington Beach 92rr18
AlrROVED 7_0
File #: 22-123 MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Sean Joyce, Interim City Manager
PREPARED BY: Chris Slama, Director of Community & Library Services
Subject:
Consider Withdrawal of Previous City Council Approval of the Edison Park Reconfiguration
Conceptual Plan
Statement of Issue:
On November 16, 2021, City Council approved a Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan for Edison Park
and authorized staff to start development of the design. With the benefit of additional community
feedback received since November, staff recommends further community outreach and additional
review and analysis of the conceptual plan. It is staffs hope that additional outreach and
conceptual design modifications can lead to greater community consensus, followed by appropriate
environmental impact analysis that will, ultimately, lead to specific park improvements that will be
the source of greater resident and park user enthusiasm.
Financial Impact:
There is no financial impact associated with the recommended actions. Funding in the amount of
$300,000 has been included in the City's FY 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Edison
Community Park design services, which is sufficient to continue the design development process.
Recommended Action:
A) Withdraw the November 16, 2021 City Council approval of the final Edison Park Reconfiguration
Conceptual Plan; and,
B) Direct staff to conduct further community outreach and additional review and analysis of the
Conceptual Plan, and return to City Council.
Alternative Action(s):
Do not approve the recommended actions and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis:
Edison Park, located at 21377 Magnolia Avenue, was constructed in the early 1970s and opened to
the public in 1974. The park is 39.69 acres, with 27.5 of those acres (or 69%) existing on a former
City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 224/2022
File #: 22-123 MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
County landfill. Since opening, Edison Park has met a wide variety of active and passive recreation
needs of Huntington Beach residents, despite there being no major park updates since its original
development. Additionally, the former landfill has resulted in ongoing settlement, which limits the
location and type of park renovations that can be made due to soil stability and structural
requirements. In 2009, the City approved a Master Plan for Edison Park involving a complete
reconfiguration of the park, including a variety of improvements such as a new parking lot, expansion
of the existing parking lot, new sports practice fields, a multi-purpose field, relocation of existing
walkways, trees, landscape and hardscape improvements, bocce ball courts, new tennis courts and a
skate park.
As part of the City Council approved Fiscal Year 2021/22 Capital Improvement Program (CIP),
funding was allocated to solicit public input to aid in development of an updated conceptual plan to
reconfigure Edison Park. Staff engaged RJM Design Group to facilitate community input to address
changing recreation trends and guide current and future park and recreation development needs at
Edison Park. This outreach began in May of 2021 and culminated with a recommended conceptual
plan that was approved by City Council on November 16, 2021 . The approved minutes from that
meeting, including the staff presentation outlining the public input process, are attached. (Attachment
1 & 2).
A dedicated project website, bit.ly/hbedisonpark, was developed by RJM at the onset of the outreach
to provide residents project updates, allow them to participate in surveys and live-workshops, and
submit their thoughts and ideas through a "Feedback" button. This website is still active, providing
the community an opportunity to continue submitting their feedback. As of November 2021 , there
were 4,034 views of the website, and 623 participants in the three online surveys, live community
workshop and the design charrette. A high volume of participants reported to be from the southeast
Huntington Beach area, where Edison Park is located.
Taking community input and the existing Park Master Plan into consideration, much of the conceptual
design involves maintaining or replacing existing park amenities near their current locations. The
plan also includes amenities previously prioritized by City Council and the Huntington Beach
community, such as expanded opportunities for lighted youth sports fields and additional pickleball
courts.
Following approval of the Conceptual Plan in November 2021, staff has undertaken some preliminary
analysis and further public outreach. Staff now believes the previously approved Conceptual Plan
warrants reconsideration to address some of the feedback received to date. While an extensive
public input process was conducted as referenced above, we believe additional input from
neighboring residents of the park would result in an even better park plan.
If the City Council approves the recommended action, additional public input would be conducted to
ensure a more comprehensive view of the community's evolving needs is collected in consideration
of the future redevelopment of Edison Park. Once more feedback is collected and is the subject of
appropriate site analysis, staff will return to City Council for consideration.
Environmental Status:
City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 2/2 412 0 2 2
po Nere794 Leg,s;ar"
File #: 22-123 MEETING DATE: 3/1/2022
The recommended actions are to withdraw a previously approved Conceptual Plan for Edison Park
and to conduct additional site analysis and public outreach. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15378(b)(5), the recommended actions are considered administrative activities of the City that will not
result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment and, as such, do not constitute a
project as defined in the CEQA Guidelines. In addition, since the actions would not result in any
physical changes to the environment, the actions would be considered exempt pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3), which exempts activities where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Furthermore, the action
to withdraw a previous approval would be exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(4), which exempts
projects that are rejected or disapproved by a public agency.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Infrastructure & Parks
Attachment(s1:
1) City Council Minutes dated November 16, 2021
2) Staff PowerPoint Presentation dated November 16, 2021
3) Edison Park Conceptual Plan Diagram
City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 2/24/2022
powerel,95 Legistar""
Council/PFA Regular Minutes
November 16, 2021
Page 4 of 23
Sean Crumby, Public Works Director, stated Mark has been with the City for over 30 years, and after six
promotions is now Wastewater Supervisor. As an example of Mark's commitment, Director Crumby
described how about 15 years ago Mark actually retrieved a prosthetic eye in the sewer system for a
resident.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATIONS (Received After Agenda Distribution)
Pursuant to the Brown "Open Meetings" Act, City Clerk Robin Estanislau announced supplemental
communications received by her office following distribution of the Council Agenda packet.
Consent Calendar
#23 (21-868) Communication received regarding revising and redesigning the City's website.
Administrative Items
#21 (21-852) PowerPoint presentation entitled "Purchase 2 Tesla Model Y for Police Department"
submitted by Sean Crumby, Director of Public Works.
#25 (21-863) Communication submitted by Travis Hopkins, Assistant City Manager submitting an
amendment to Ordinance Nos. 4240, 4244 and 4241.
Email communication received regarding introduction of Ordinance No. 4240 amending
HBMC 2.102 Environmental & Sustainability Board.
#26 (21-875) PowerPoint presentation entitled "Downtown Urban Design Study Huntington Beach, CA"
submitted by Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development.
Two (2) email communications received regarding solicitation of proposals to redesign
Main Street and the extension of the temporary closure of the second block of Main
Street.
#27 (21-877) Communication submitted by Chris Slama, Community and Library Services Director,
submitting a revised staff report, including Recommended Action Option C (Revised
Conceptual Design) for Edison Park.
PowerPoint presentation entitled "Edison Park Conceptual Plan" submitted by Chris
Slama, Director of Community and Library Services.
Communication submitted by Chris Slama, Community and Library Services Director,
submitting a revised staff report, including Recommended Action Option B and
attachments (Conceptual Designs for Options A and B).
Thirty-six (36) email communications regarding the Edison Park Reconfiguration
Conceptual Plan.
#28 (21-880) PowerPoint presentation entitled " Introduction of Proposed Memoranda of Understanding
with Huntington Beach Firefighters' Association and Fire Management Association"
submitted by Brittany Mello, Interim Administrative Services Director.
Communication submitted by Brittany Mello, Interim Administrative Services Director,
submitting a legislative draft of the MOU between the City and the Huntington Beach
Firefighters' Association (HBFA).
196
Council/PFA Regular Minutes
November 16, 2021
Page 17 of 23
Mayor Carr stated that Downtown is the "Welcome Mat"for Huntington Beach, and her support for a plan
which will incorporate all of downtown and make it consistent and cohesive, including Pier Plaza. Mayor
Carr asked why those businesses that signed the petition presented by Mr. Bolen object to the City
spending millions of dollars to improve the area.
Mayor Carr confirmed with Director Luna-Reynosa that the project is expected to require a Coastal
Development Permit, but should not have to go before the Coastal Commission unless there is an
appeal.
Mayor Carr stated there may be parking space considerations if the City can continue to offer
transportation options like Circuit. She shared her interest in the flexible plaza option for Second Block,
as well as ensuring input from every property and business owner. Mayor Carr agrees there may be
safety issues regarding incorporating one-way vehicle traffic, but that will be studied as the project moves
forward.
Councilmember Posey recommended Councilmembers read a report written by Southern California
Association of Government (SCAG) and Orange County Business Council (OCBC) entitled Infill Refill
Opportunities which analyzes under-performing and low-performing retail space in four cities, including
Huntington Beach.
A motion was made by Carr, second Delgleize to direct staff to solicit proposals to prepare construction
documents for a Main Street Plaza Scheme reconfiguration; and direct staff to extend the temporary
closure of the second block of Main Street to vehicular traffic during the reconfiguration evaluation.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Bolton, Delgleize, Carr, Posey, Moser, and Kalmick
NOES: Peterson
27. 21-877 Approved Revised Edison Park Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan "Option C"
submitted via Supplemental Communication
City Manager Chi introduced Director of Community and Library Services Chris Slama and Tamara
McClory, RJM Design Group, who presented a PowerPoint communication titled Edison Park Conceptual
Plan with slides entitled: Project Purpose, Project Timeline, Community Outreach - Outreach Advertising,
Community Outreach, Virtual Online Survey#1, Virtual Online Survey#1 Results, Virtual Online Survey
#2, Virtual Online Survey#2 Results, In Person Community Workshop, In Person Community Design
Charette (3), Community Outreach, Group Composite Plan, Group Consensus Plan, Virtual Online
Feedback Survey, Utilize Group Plan Template, Conceptual Plan Option A, Tennis/Pickleball Court
Layout, What's A Pump Track?, Refinements to Conceptual Plan A, Conceptual Plan Option B,
Additional Neighbor Concerns Raised, Areas of Residents Concern, Concerns Assessed, Response
Option Developed, Conceptual Plan Option C, Next Steps, City Council Options, and Thank You.
City Attorney Michael Gates noted for the record that this project may require a Measure C analysis,
which means residents must be given the right to vote on proposed construction on beach or park land
which exceeds a specific dollar amount.
Mayor Pro Tem Delgleize and Director Slama discussed the adjacent land owned by the Huntington
Beach School District, or former Kettler Elementary School, which includes three softball fields; parking
options; replacement tree policy; and community outreach efforts.
197
Council/PFA Regular Minutes
November 16, 2021
Page 18 of 23
Councilmember Peterson stated his support for Option C and suggested staff ensure more people are in
the communication loop.
Councilmember Posey expressed appreciation for the detailed report, efforts for community
communication and knowing that new trees will replace any that must be removed. Councilmember
Posey and Director Slama discussed funding options, and that at this time with so many variables, there
is no way to estimate the cost.
Councilmember Posey suggested that the wood from trees that must be removed possibly be recycled
into park amenities such as benches. He further stated that the majority of park development funds
come from developer fees.
Councilmember Bolton suggested a link be established between the City's website directly to the Edison
Park project website to make the project website easier to access. Councilmember Bolton and Director
Slama discussed exploring whether any of the existing impacted trees could be relocated.
Councilmember Kalmick confirmed with Director Slama it is anticipated that there will be a net of more
than 100 trees for this project. There was discussion that if the Huntington Beach School District were to
put a road through a portion of Edison Park it would require City approval, and presently there has not
been any discussions on that possibility.
Councilmember Kalmick and Director Slama continued their discussion on dual use of playing fields
which will be accessible open green space when there is no practice or games; Southern California
Edison (SCE) easements; repurposing and relocating courts on landfill; entrance change; and possible
impact of Measure C requirements.
Councilmember Moser stated her appreciation for staff and RJM Design Group response to
neighborhood concerns. She stated her support for Option C; and appreciation for knowing that there
will be a net of more trees than will be removed; effort for reciprocal parking arrangements; the need for
better outreach; and continued public input as the project moves forward.
Mayor Carr, Director Slama and Ms. McClory discussed the current number of parking spaces vs. Option
C parking spaces; options to prevent overnight use; timing for lights; placement and use of picnic tables;
the design process will include ADA compliance, the pump track priority during feedback; and recognition
of how various activity options could impact the number of trees or amount of green space.
Mayor Carr suggested future outreach include door-to-door efforts, and expressed her concerns about
ensuring there are soccer playing fields for next Fall. Director Slama stated there was never any
expectation that the City would provide soccer playing fields for next fall, and added that AYSO,
Huntington Beach School District and City staff are in continued discussions to determine appropriate
solutions.
Mayor Pro Tern Delgleize and Ms. McClory discussed additional geotechnical studies and testing may be
required to confirm cause of the settling issues and possible refinement of the plan.
Mayor Pro Tern Delgleize confirmed with City Attorney Gates that until a more specific plan is in place
Measure C impacts are unknown, but it is important to be aware of Measure C requirements moving
forward.
198
Council/PFA Regular Minutes
November 16, 2021
Page 19 of 23
Councilmember Moser confirmed with Director Slama that plans do include peace and calm spaces,
especially during the day, and discussion on the plan for newer, more modern lights which are more
directional and focused, as well as additional trees to increase the perimeter buffer.
A motion was made by Delgleize, second Carr to approve the final Edison Park reconfiguration
conceptual plan (Option C), and authorize staff to move forward with initiating development of the design
and bid package for construction of the updated facility.
The motion, as amended by Supplemental Communication (Option C) carried by the following vote:
AYES: Peterson, Bolton, Delgleize, Carr, Posey, Moser, and Kalmick
NOES: None
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2015-46, at approximately 10:50 PM a consensus of Council was
reached to continue the meeting past the hour of 11:00 PM.
28. 21-880 Approved Introduction of the Proposed Memorandum of Understanding Between
the Huntington Beach Firefighters' Association (HBFA) and the City of Huntington
Beach for July 1, 2021, through December 31, 2023
City Manager Chi introduced Interim Director of Administrative Services Brittany Mello and Fire Chief
Haberle who presented a PowerPoint communication titled Introduction of Proposed Memoranda of
Understanding with Huntington Beach Firefighters'Association and Fire Management Association with
slides entitled: Overview, Proposed Memoranda of Understanding, FY 2021122 Fiscal Impact, FY
2022123 Fiscal Impact, FY 2023124 Fiscal Impact, and City Council Options.
Councilmember Peterson stated that this was the only bargaining unit which offered to give up any
increase during the City's financial troubles a few years ago, adding that he is happy to support proposed
Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs) for both the HBFA and FMA.
Councilmember Posey stated his agreement with Councilmember Peterson's comments, and added that
as pay and benefits decline there is the risk of losing good talent to other agencies, and he supports this
effort to ensure Huntington Beach is able to retain the best and brightest staff.
Councilmember Kalmick commended these frontline workers for their extra efforts during the COVID-19
pandemic and stated his support for keeping Huntington Beach competitive.
A motion was made by Peterson, second Delgleize to approve the introduction of the proposed
Memorandum of Understanding between the Huntington Beach Firefighters' Association and the City of
Huntington Beach for the period of July 1, 2021, through December 31, 2023.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Peterson, Bolton, Delgleize, Carr, Posey, Moser, and Kalmick
NOES: None
29. 21-889 Approved Introduction of the Proposed Memorandum of Understanding Between
the Huntington Beach Fire Management Association (FMA) and the City of
Huntington Beach for July 1, 2021, through December 31, 2023
199
Edison Park ��� F��
Conceptual Plan get�r�
f �.... . Efnmmm»:?n^'�:•'lYbnNfffOrrtf rcn::n+uymn++u!•.....
CITY COUNCIL
PRESENTATION
t � � ' , ConceptuolMoster
BY: •O •
J �� � 1 Plonning bored on
200
_ a. �� � NOVEMBER2a21
PROJECT PURPOSE
4�mil
TO DEVELOP AN EDISON PARK
CONCEPTUAL PLAN THAT WILL GUIDE BASED ON COMMUNITY-WIDE
CURRENT AND FUTURE PARK AND INPUT + PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS
RECREATION DEVELOPMENT;
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CouncBo'
PROJECT TIMELINE
OMMUNITY
• BACKGROUND DATA OUTREACH • CONSENSUS BUBBLE DIAGRAM
COLLECTION
• PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL PLAN
• SITE INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS • PROJECTWEBSITE
• REFINED CONCEPTUAL PLAN
• OPPORTUNITIES AND • VIRTUAL ONLINE SURVEYS
CONSTRAINTS • COMMUNITY & LIBRARY SERVICES
• IN PERSON COMMUNITY COMMISSION
WORKSHOP + DESIGN • FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS TO
CHARRETTE CITY COUNCIL
• VIRTUAL ONLINE FEEDBACK
SURVEY
• • CONCEPTUAL
ANALYSIS PLAN
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CouncBo,
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
OUTREACH
ADVERTISING
Edison
• PROJECT WEBSITE bit.ly/hbedisonpork `
• CITY WEBSITE, CITY FACEBOOK / SOCIAL MEDIA
• COUNCIL MEETINGS & CM NEWSLETTER Edison Park
Conceptual Plan
• VARIOUS COMMUNITY GROUPS CONTACTED
• COMMUNITY & LIBRARY SERVICES COMMISSION _--
(MEETING NOTICES MAILED / LOCAL NEWSPAPERS)
• FLYERS AT COMMUNITY CENTER
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Council
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
• SURVEY I - 160 PARTICIPANTS
: ONLINE SURVEY SURVEY 2 - 295 PARTICIPANTS
r_t• .
❑■ ;�.�• • COMMUNITY WORKSHOP - 10 PARTICIPANTS
• COMMUNITY DESIGN CHARRETTE - 45 PARTICIPANTS
PERSONIN
• • • FEEDBACK SURVEY - 90 PARTICIPANTS
WORKSHOP
• FEEDBACK COMMENTS - 23 PARTICIPANTS
PERSONIN • WEBSITE VIEWS - 4, 034
COMMUNITY •
DESIGN D • 711(
•CHARRIETTE 623 TOTAL PARTICIPANTS
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Counci"
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
VIRTUAL I . How do you recreate at Edison Park?
ONLINE SURVEY
2. What do you like most about Edison Park and why?
3. What do you dislike most about Edison Park and why?
4. What are the most important improvements the Community
and Library Services Department can make at Edison Park?
5. What are your most preferred amenities you would like to see
at Edison Park?
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CouncRO5
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
VIRTUAL
ONLINE SURVEY
# 1 RESULTS
What are your
most preferred
amenities you
would like to see m 0
at Edison Park? le OJc�e�a�\oJ °oF�.`ocQa air\e�a'oJl Ji� Qa Qo°\e�a'a�°e c�e� `er fee`' Qaa �.K$6
eaa�O Q\� �`y` e`'�� Q ec�\c�Q`ec ab 5e ao� � sew A°e a\�si \ayr yea
Q sec c °Q aQE y°c ems yQo a.� J el yQ
OAF .oa
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CouncHm
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
I . What are the most important ACTIVE recreation amenitiesVIRTUAL /
facilities (new or existing) you would like to see at Edison
ONLINE
Park?
2. What are the most important PASSIVE recreation amenities /
facilities (new or existing) you would like to see at Edison
Park?
3. What are the most important MAINTENANCE / SITE
improvements (new or existing) you would like to see at
Edison Park?
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Counci'llo'
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
VIRTUAL . . Active Top Passive Top Maintenance F
Recreation Recreation Site Improvements
ONLINE SURVEY
Improvements Improvements
#2 RESULTS
Aquatics / Pool / Restrooms Cleanliness
Splashpad
Tennis Courts Playground (Equipment Security
/ Surfacing)
Skate Park / Skate Spot Community Center / Maintenance
Recreation Classes
Pickleball Courts Trees / Landscape Update / Renovate
Basketball Courts Dog Area / Dog Park Trash / Receptacles
Purpose Timeline Background Conceptual Plan City CouncHol
COMMUNITY OUTREACH _ aw A •
PERSONIN
COMMUNITY14MA. ff�
WORKSHOP
. . Active Recreation Top Passive Recreation Top Maintenance / Site
Improvements
Skate Spot / Skate Park Community Center / Recreation Cleanliness
Basketball Courts Classes
Climbing Wall Community Garden Security
Pickleball Courts Playground (Equipment / Surfacing) Maintenance
Aquatics/Pool/Splash Pad, Batting Restrooms
Cages, Pump Track, Softball Fields,
Bike Paths, Exercise Areas, Picnic Parking
Areas,Trash Receptacles,
Sports Fields, Running Track Trees/Landscape,Walking Paths Trash / Receptacles
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CouncAO9
COMMUNITYOUTREACH
IN PERSON
COMMUNITY Site
DESIGN Awareness Group
CHARRETTE Discussions
Tou r
Site
Analysis
Consensus
Master
Planning
• . : . • e , .
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
_••.� -_--
I O 1
T I ,
I 1
1
1
o
I! ,�.•�; •, - _ - - 1.'-- I
� p r
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan (--it"y cul Ci!
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
• Participants divided into 6 groups
• As a group, draw and/or model x�
your ideas for the park master
plan on the group template
r
Purpose Timeline Background •�- �� Conceptual Plan City CouncH11
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
• •
• • A •
6 GROUP BUBBLE I GROUP
6 GROUP PLANS PLANS COMPOSITE
PLAN
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Council"
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
LEGEND ? RESIDENTIAL
WHITE TOT LOT _
e • e • Buildings LAVENDER r
Tot lot
TAN
COMPOSITEParking SKATE PARK
LIGHT BLUE
PL
♦ COURTS • Skate Park I
TIGHT YELLOW • Ropes Course
• Volleyball • Pump Tsock
• Tennis • Splash Pad
• Basketball I
PARK/GARDEN
DARK YELLOW MINT GREEN ❑
• Handball/ • Trees
Racquetball/ • Informal Garden
Badminton • Formal Garden F
• Pickleball • Dog Park
• Horseshoes • Community Q
• Bocce Ball Garden
• Batting Cages O
Z
0
FIELDS-SALMON Q
• Softball Z
• lbtle League
• HS Baseball
• Soccer
t
I
—OWN by SCF
HAMILITON AVE
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Counci4'"
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
LEGEND RESIDENTIAL
WHITE TOT LOT r _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —e
• • Buildings LAVENDER
• Tot Lot I
TAN
CONSENSUSParking SKATE PARK
LIGHT BLUE FIELDS K 1,KQ,K•3 PL
AN
COURTS • Skate Park I OWNED AND OPERATED SGGGER
LIGHT YELLOW • Ropes Course I BY SCHOOL DISTRICT �•�
Volleyball • Pump Track
• Tennis • Splash Pad I •f
• Basketball I TE\\i
PARK/GARDEN
DARK YELLOW MINT GREEN
• Handball/ • Trees I l0 Q
Racquetball/ • Informal Garden 1, 4 rn
Badminton • Formal Garden m L PAR,�3 r
• Plckleboll • Dog Fork ra
• Horseshoes • Community SC ''
• Bocce Ball Garden 3 aG� qG' •_�1. O
• Batting Cages JScl-cR Z
FIELDS-SALMON
Q
• Softball L
Little League SCCCE2 SG�'B•>`__ �C�I_ __
IllJ • HS Baseball
• Soccer
RESIDENTIAL
SCECORRIDOR WaOE� ra•>,R.7th SGGGER �.�CCER
OWNED AND OPERATED BY SCE
Ik HAMILITON AVE
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Council"
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
VIRTUAL ,,-;' 90 PARTICIPANTS
ONLINE
FEEDBACK 51 DID NOT PARTICIPATE IN PREVIOUS OUTREACH
SURVEY
OPPORTUNITIES
• 39 DID PARTICIPATE
• TOP COMMENTS RELATED TO:
• TENNIS COURTS • PUMPTRACK
• SKATEPARK • OPEN SPACE
• PICKLEBALL • TOT LOT
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Council"
1V0L'MPM1I I D I
UTILIZE GROUP „ � ' }` � �•.+. _ j �, � I
PLAN TEMPLATE • '
RE�DF,iu � � • � EDISON PARK ail � � I�
G ' � ' 1 � �• f� la
• J EIE � �,i I p
a SCE CORRIDOR
I APN 1.8�011�OA
NED ANU OPERATED SCE ��`
• .. .. _ NA v.:.Yrr u.�._.
Purpose Background •
CONCEPTUAL PLAN E i RS PARK CONCEPTUAL EGENO
econl�raf Uut•J W w•n vnv enhr a1 h,lwn„5 9
nwmcMan. 0 '
2 Evonoed P"V of Mw owoo on aro naw envy a 2 SMI NIL DR
Pa law.
• 6 S.New t caul blon++•Vn wal.p arW Vu 1
6.l,aw bf U c beetbal cwt 1+I. = 1
S.Wes hoN coon bortelbaGc 161 _
w ♦ A Mewte'.*cove 121.
2.Now WmWe N"wV eal 121.
a New 1>k�tabMt.
9 M.w.ncb w dog o,.w ales..'I"'g ona V ads 9 R
OPTION A
10.EwtM lems ca..ds 143 ono e.lcon•enw to 13 e
pic6bbcl cwtt 1e1. 11 y
11.Reconll xP01 waawon s 1
12.E*Wg trees. 1 $ 12 '
19.1/ew hero.
57 new parking stalls,reconfigured parking 6 Newtwegww. 17 11 2 6
IS.EA Wv lonbal M1dt.
lot 16.New Y 10150 yds.70 yosl toccw rbw o.•e6o we w /,r______--'--t—
tlteopeonl7oym.I10whi
• 8 dedicated pickleball courts ,,,ww.�w,a;e,ta,;,,eande„„„t>o..aoa,,,e I I I I • �
• 8 dual-use ickleball courts overlaid on 2 1e'E"U10130Ych I L 10 j s ° ,e 2
P 9.New VIO n0 Yt.)0 Wg occw ee d o e by• SCE
tennis courts Calla Ipwv2w SCEvMew6apxoval. �� J
20.Newf+Vawboc.. —T—t--
• 4 half-court & 4 full-court basketball courts 21.ENwgw rtaespol —
22 New la lot w h nmbe.fulocmg.eaupnlent and �i r-- — �0
• New dog area two. I — 1 I "'
23.Et�alOw e.*orlwresho at com ffy centw. I le I I �'- -r 20 '
• Ex anded cot lac
P ?•.Eab1Yq SCF lowest arq orarwoo V1eh wwt. 1 1 I ',' 21
• Expanded skate spot 2S.New lwk,ftw eam[o etw edam e
26.Reconfyuwbont cogel o
• New pump track 27 Dual uwcoaal2famt 8pkdoboq. - —_ _--- 1; 12 -
• Maintain parallel parking on Hamilton Ave ®� 1- 'd}'d —
• Maintain existing Edison HS crosswalk „ ""' _ J �-j - 13
• Install a new crosswalk at Stillwell Dr
NAMIITON AVE -
I
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Counc1A18
TENNIS / PICKLEBALL COURT LAYOUT
4 pickleball courts 2 pickleball courts
on I tennis courts on I tennis courts
soon ■
� n
■■ ■■
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CouncH19
WHAT'S A PUMP TRACK?
-,
40 • �►
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Counci420
REFINEMENTS TO CONCEPTUAL PLAN A
• The Community & Library Services Commission unanimously
approved "Conceptual Plan A" as the recommend upgrade for Edison
Park
• However, based on additional feedback received from youth sports
groups, staff worked with RJM to develop an alternative concept that
incorporates additional dedicated soccer space into the concept plan
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CounCA21
WHOM PARK CONCIPNAI PLAN IIGIMO i y 1J
1.Rac,wowea Wf ry W I win new cony al Fao.n n) - -it
JA
2.hpanee.ppM1ky W lf,drop."ara new enlry.1 - a� I SIIIWIII OR -ram
Popov larse.
1 Hew"pat C'.Nt pwo wM 6samp and R ce
z
,.NOW U covl Dl=k can 141 u (/ a IfiI J I I
Mew b M
A ow C oolterDaR Co 14)q \�
CONCEPTUAL
1
A Mew femb cuvb AI , . ° .e��1
7.Flew pacece rvltYp wal lTl �� � ,
• • - s new pnrC lod.s
e.Mew endmad aap aea vnlN wolw scamp ano sraoe
10.LwNp lelnl covf6 I q ma Ygwrnm�ao t. I J • nR11,11
OPTION B pk6.bala0uff,°' �as ?l
I I.Reconfpue.waewoy6 - J
i 1
12.FiglM1q Heel 1 J 12 S 1 1
U.New noes. �
I,.Ww made sb W 17 11 2
15 ba too w"IDal helot
16.New U 10(50 yes R 70 vdll so wRea odma whin kA .I 'r r , i 26 1 7 Cn�
• 3rd dedicated U 10 soccer Wo opron j70 yM a 110 yal'
17.New emcee'101 6 a,aecannosea Aaafe. I 1 16 I I • -
field added to the SCE o: "CIO" owl «a.led o ad, cl, E i `�� i 5 ° 1,
C.ffaaf Ipenwy SCf My •opa.rdl 1 e U
corridor along Hamilton p�ka.� e, 2 1 >
22� ,lol b1 wm,nwae� ocYw.gaup f ara - Ij r ---�.. l s 1 .A
Avenue
M Er dwC eK'sb rn'some al CamwrrfY Center 17 I I 16 I ( 0
24.f.6,WQ SCf luwed and o.erMaa ulih foes. I i p 21 l,u,
25.New pat reshaam asd cancxaore stood. L____� i e
26.RecoNipAeE botnnp capes
27.Oud um calb(2 tank WRll R pcaebaf). _ _ 13 ^—
__�—�V
_
I . I
IL I L
_ —- —i--- —
^ nAMIIiON Avl
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Councii-
ADDITIONAL NEIGHBOR CONCERNS RAISED
• In the days after the concept plans for Edison Park were published,
staff received feedback from several neighboring residents to Edison
Park citing additional concerns:
I . Addition of the 57-space parking stall along Stillwell Drive may result in
neighborhood impacts, and the loss of mature trees
2. Sports courts (pickleball, tennis, and basketball) along Magnolia Street would
result in the removal of several large eucalyptus trees
3. Full-sized soccer field overlay on softball fields would create a more intense
use, and result in the removal of mature trees
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CounCR23
LZ
CONCEPTUAL PLAN oo` S"`"E"°"
jLsL
AREAS
u. 11_ pfi
D
0 0 0.0
• — qq RESIDENTS
CONCERN � � ) a
57-space parking lot addition would � � -'� i i ® I� I` , • , �'
`r 3 o o w•
intensify use of the park, and eliminate i
mature trees
_--�_ '_`
2. Sports courts would result in removal of i i `lam
eucalyptus trees L�_ , ',j o
3. Soccer field overlay on softball fields
would result in an intensified use, and h
eliminate mature trees --- 1—L-
y, HAMMON AVE -
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Councifi°
CONCERNS ASSESSED, RESPONSE OPTION DEVELOPED
• Proposed parking lot on Stillwell Drive was added based on community feedback,
however, the parking facility could be removed
• Staff would assess offsite parking alternatives to address peak park usage times
• Given site constraints at Edison Park, and the demand for active recreation
components like pickleball, tennis, basketball, and soccer, the removal of trees in
select locations will be necessary to meet the community's needs
• Of note, the proposed plan to upgrade Edison Park includes the addition of more
than 200 new trees
• Also, if there are particular trees of interest at Edison park, the Public Works team has assessed
that tree relocation efforts can be engaged
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CouncH25
I1.R ►ARe d por VQ AI RAN IEGENO
I,R•Confpuaa wb'p w'with,vw n•my at k�N.S. -
Wd*Nec•en, R 1 r
2.New pMLW br• ky of PMfan lone.
7.I9ay.•RX0 cp f pbw wiM.•af�p and V� h' 12
6.N•w N coon 00*eftWa cean I.1
s.NewrgR Co ba.ter c.wd I•I 7'
• • • 6.N•w 1w.cwh 121 •o it �.
7.N•w WWc e'Wi WOE 121.
. - - •. e.N•w print IabIM.
9.M1 prod. 1
10.Em1RV lame CO (•,arw I.Ico,i eW d to
OPTIONC 11.11•dan t•o wdkwoyl.
IA.New Iree. 1 — 5 4. S
16.N•w orod•YnIM. �I
15.Emlklp wfta 11 b
1 a New p 10 lw yds.70 ydN soccer feq.v n.hMM ..
• To address the concerns raised, a 17.N•ww a cbeslvr Ovcompowp groWe.
10.E*"wdtnvp. I I I I • '
third Conceptual Plan Option C •N. U 10(50YM.70 , cwfew, W%e,..,SCE
Canitla(pMdIp SCE Tsewa Wprow]I. `___� I 1s 14 27
was developed
21.r�pw aw 1pa1. _ _
_ ,
22.N•w ld bl wRN Mover w10Ckq.•oWnlenr and
gde I =f--
fl
• In this plan, the S7-stall parking area 21bporq• o 4• kwy,.tt olCor 1,Cam t' r , ,
20
24.EAtkp SCE]ow•n and rnerh•od ur•ly kris. 17 I 16 ',
and dedicated dog area located 25' Pa ms
Mw000rw=«<eepN+•rand ( i 0 21
2a Recmlgved bolrk,p cape I____.
along Stillwell Drive are removed 27 Ocalar cwh 12 brr*wan 0 01c0•oa0. L—___ _ _.- 1 I •
13 2
HAMMON AV
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City CounCA26
NEXT STEPS
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND GEOTECHNICAL / ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
•40PERFORM AND PREPARE COMPUTER / CAD AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC SITE SURVEY
iCONCEPTUAL
COMPUTER / CAD DRAFT CONCEPTUAL PLAN ON CAD SITE SURVEY WITH
EXISTING SITE ELEMENTS, UTILITIES, FACILITI ES,AMEN ITIES, BUILDINGS AND TREES
IDENTIFIED
PERFORM SITE GEOTECHNICALAND ENGINEERING STUDIES BASED ON
PLAN TO CONFIRM FEASIBILITY OF DESIGN
• REFINE CONCEPTUAL PLAN BASED ON ENGINEERING INFORMATION, CITY PLAN
CHECK DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, PROGRAMMING NEEDS, COMMUNITY OUTREACH
IL PREPARE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND DETAILS BASED ON REFINED
CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND COMMUNITY INPUT
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Council
CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS
• Option A: Select the Edison Park reconfiguration conceptual plan as approved by
the Community & Library Services Commission, and authorize staff to move
forward with initiating development of the design and bid package for construction
of the updated facility.
• Option B: Select the revised Edison Park reconfiguration conceptual plan,
exhibited as Option B, and authorize staff to move forward with initiating
development of the design and bid package for construction of the updated facility.
• Option Q Select the revised Edison Park reconfiguration conceptual plan,
exhibited as Option C, and authorize staff to move forward with initiating
development of the design and bid package for construction of the updated facility.
Purpose Timeline Background Outreach Conceptual Plan City Counc421
a-`
Edison Park Parks �°`
Conceptual Plan set�er� ` �` �
1 a�NTIN�T�
2 I
ConceptualMoster yCFCpUNTVrt,
�l Planning based on
� Communitylnput
�: � � MAY through
�;;y ' NOVEMBER2021
Edison Community Park
Conceptual Design by RJM�D}e—sign Group up
EDISON PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN LEGEND 1 ..�% �f I ~� 3 �-y�� 5'.:�r pnl
I.ReconLgueo Vatu,y iol wln new entry OI Edna,ti.5 T y7 I � ]l { I I Q
2.Expontlsd pakYp 101 with crop oN and new entry at ',J S TI L W E L L DA
Poste lase. f .J,� Nd
3.New Ipal coon Plato win seaerg and shade. �., � '`J .. J
+.New hA court basketball court(x).
6.New hadfen tout bs 121. al court(I).
6.New term couch 121. 4 ?:. e
7.New practice hillinp wall(21. i�Xl
&New Wm IobMs.
9.New enclosed dog aeo with water seating and shone y "r
G
ID.Exwtinp teen touts I+3 and+ n ticonvees to J � 13 6 ,J
picklebal courts(8). c 11 6 l' —k :.
I I.Reconfqured walkways. 3 `� EDISON H S
12.Existing heel. 13 s 1 �. 5 ".4
13.New trees- ✓'J _ 2 "•"'-ter.
14.New shade sheller. 4 15.Exist n,g softball tielos. ..!
41
r_—______I sJl
16.New U 10(50 vas x 70 yas)soccer field c�rrv„ ..,•. . `./ C 26 1 7
site ophor,170 yds x l lD sasl.
17.New exercise stations on decomposes granite. I °
18.Existing wakways. a I I 16 I "-'✓ Z
19.New UIO ISO ydsr 70 yids)soccer field overloy sr,SCE j— —j, I 1s ° 14 E7 J n `■ _ W,•� f
Contact(pending SCE review S. 123 approval)- 1 e0 =O ` 1
20.New pump hack. ------ - ` 0
21.Enlarged skate spot. --ink
_ �. 1
22.New tot lot with wbiler sorfockig,equipment and ,i r——--, 1 s 'lT!tI I! t in k .
mode. ) I I 1
23.Expanded exterior reshooms at Cormwnity Center, 17 16 020 }}} 1
w r
2+.Finling SCE Towers and overhead utery Ikses. 1( � � i i' ` E r 21 S
25.New pork restroann and concessions stand.
26.Recetpued batting copes.
27.Dual use coots(2larks°with 8 pickle"). 13 ' 12 = .-, E
J -
I pp
1 19 � _•_ � V _._.— 1_ _ 19 �� _ 1B 1
HAMILITON AVE
'wet
11/5/2021 P
RJMW � EMI N PARK N EPTUAL PLANI,
° CI"rY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH.CALIFORNIAI
230
31112022
EdisonHuntington Beach
Conceptual Plan City Council Meeting March 1, 2022
Item 22-123
Ot hBF
7 '?
roux" *`
PROJECT
• Edison Park, located at 21377 Magnolia Avenue, was constructed in
the early 1970s, and is in need of refurbishment.
• In 2009, a Master Plan for Edison Park was approved, involving a
complete reconfiguration of the park.
• The approved Fiscal Year 2021/22 CIP program includes funding to
develop an updated conceptual plan to reconfigure Edison Park, in
order to address changing recreation trends.
Ot N�Mllx6)��B
• In May 2021, staff engaged RJM Design Group to facilitate
community input that would be used to develop a conceptual plan ? -
to guide current and future park and recreation development. '=sFrnvxnc�`t�
- ., :'POEM
NIMUNICATION
.V
ce;,oa Item No.:
3/1/2022
COMMUNITYOUTREACH
• Launched Project Website ...
bit.t y/hbedisonpark .-----
Website views: 4,034
• City Website, City Facebook /Social Media Edison Park Conceptual Plan
• City Council Meetings
• City Manager Newsletter
- r
• Various Community Groups Informed
• Community& Library Services Commission
ldi�n Park
(Meeting Notices Mailed to residents and
businesses within 1,000 ft. radius/ local
newspapers)
• Postings at Community Center / Park
• Registration Software E-mail Blasts
• „ OUTREACH
• Survey 1 - 160 Participants
• Survey 2 — 295 Participants
Community Workshop — 10 Participants
• Community Design Charrette - 45 Participants
• Feedback Survey — 90 Participants
`��NiIMG/pN
• Feedback Comments — 23 Participants ° sf
623 Total Participants '
sF�OUNri V`�to
2
3/1/2022
CURRENT CONFIGURATION
City Property
r i i School District Property
I w
•i SCE Property
i Landfill Limits
� ��xt INGlp
ssFCOu�c*�
. r 2021
.o..�,.,..�
-�-�-�-••1e-�---•-�•---• I In November 2021,
-�M,e„���•_ ;�.;�. the Community &
�....:�. Library Services
_ Commission
" unanimously
approved to
•^ '� recommend the
Conceptual Plan to
♦y>M.Rp o..rw�rnp
«--u.-•�.. • City Council.
M.aw.4w r�'-
P�rrr.w•rr.e�r�awr
..... I - TINE,
0
s�w. r,•wrr. ___1 __
3
3/1/2022
ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK
Following the concept approval by
Commission,AYSO expressed the need for
additional lighted practice space.
However, neighboring residents also
articulated the following feedback:
1. 57-space parking lot addition would
intensify use of the park, and eliminate
mature trees.
2. Sports courts would result in removal of
mature trees.
3. Soccer field overlay on softball fields would
eliminate mature trees.
CONCEPTUALOPTION
• To address these a
concerns, staff and RJM
developed two
additional Conceptual — —'
Plans for City Council
consideration. —
• On November 16, 2021, ='•�_
City Council
unanimously approved :^o — •�
Option C as the Edison
Park Reconfiguration
Conceptual Plan. J
4
3/1/2022
CURRENT •
• Since the approval of Option C, staff has undertaken preliminary
analysis and further public outreach.
• Based on the feedback received, staff believes the previously
approved Conceptual Plan warrants further reconsideration, which
could lead to design modifications and greater community
consensus.
�OMTING�G
Ot NSF
C
7 !i
fsF�ouxn V``to
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
• Withdraw the November 16, 2021 City Council approval of the final
Edison Park Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan; and,
• Direct staff to conduct further community outreach and additional
review and analysis of the Conceptual Plan, and return to City
Council with updated recommendations.
�pNTING)G
ssF�ouxn U``�
5
3/1/2022
NEXT STEPS
• Site Analysis: Detailed topographical aerial survey and
certified arborist report.
• Additional Outreach: Community meetings to review site
analysis findings and gather additional resident feedback
for consideration.
• Return to City Council within 90 — 120 days to provide opoM IN6fayef
updated information and potential design modifications.
oQ
ssF�oulrT.cn``
Edison
Conceptual •
QUESTIONS?
��MiIM6)0
n
=sfOUNTr
6
Switzer, Donna
From: Autumn Abrams <autumnabrams@ymail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:13 AM
To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Vote YES on Agenda #22-123
Thank you for listening to the community's concern. Please vote yes on Agenda N22-123,Withdrawal of Previous City
Council Approval of the Edison Park Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan.
We appreciate your attention and understanding.
Sincerely,
Autumn Abrams, 25 -year resident on Catamaran Lane
SUPPLEMENI AL
COMMUNICATION
Agenda Item No.: �^�f '7 - /°2 3)
t
Switzer, Donna
From: Erica Shane <eshane@maxwellcompany.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 11:28 AM
To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org
Subject: Please vote YES on Agenda #22-123
Thank you for listening to the community's concern.
PLEASE vote YES tonight on Agenda #22-123, Withdrawal of Previous City Council Approval of the Edison Park
Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan.
We sincerely appreciate your attention and understanding. Thank you for your time!
Warm regards,
Erica Shane
(28-year homeowner on Poston Lane)
Erica Shane
Tax Admin Services
Maxwell & Company CPAs, Inc.
(949)453-1521
(949)453-1523 (fax)
16440 Bake Parkway
Suite 150
Irvine, Ca. 92618
www.maxwellcompany.com
Need to send me a file? Click here to send a file securely
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMM UN
Meeting Cate. a///Z-2/
1
Switzer, Donna
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:05 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW:Agenda Item 22 on 3/1/22 - Edison Park
From: Dana DeVore<ddevore405@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 8:26 PM
To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: RE:Agenda Item 22 on 3/1/22 - Edison Park
I am writing to request that you please vote yes on item 22, to withdraw previous approval of the Edison Park
Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan.
Voting yes will allow a review and re-evaluation of the plan and include more representative community and
user input. Despite RJM's claim of extensive community input, there was no invitation to residents surrounding
the park to participate in the surveys/planning. which calls into question how exactly they selected participants.
I've been a resident of South Huntington Beach for over 25 years, and my property is immediately adjacent to
the West side of the park. While all would agree that the park is in need of renovation, Plan C developed by
RJM is overly ambitious and would turn our beautiful park into a sports complex.
Some items needing further consideration:
• Replacement of mature, established trees with new ones requiring 5 times the water during a severe
drought.
• Impact of traffic & parking in the surrounding neighborhoods
• Light & noise for the proposed lighted soccer fields
• Feasibility of combining softball & soccer fields
• Elimination of the wide open areas
The appearance of this item on the meeting agenda shows that you are open to listening to the community's
concerns, and for that 1 thank you. Please vote yes to withdraw the previous approval and allow for more
representative community input.
Thank you,
Dana DeVore
00LEMENTAL
'*"MUNICATION
31
,fiends nem No.: .2-2 ( .2 2 - / z 3
t
Switzer, Donna
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:37 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW:Vote YES on Agenda #22-123
From: Pam Shane<pamshane55@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, March 1, 2022 12:34 PM
To: Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Frakes, Sandie<Sandie.Frakes@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara
<Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik<Erik.Peterson @surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike
<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Hopkins, Travis<thopkins@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>;
Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie <Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda
<Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>;Joyce, Sean<Sean.Joyce@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject:Vote YES on Agenda#22-123
Thank you for listening to the community's concern.
Please vote YES on Agenda #22-123- withdrawal of previous City Council approval of the
Edison Park Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan.
We all appreciate your attention and understanding.
Sincerely,
Pam Shane
28 year homeowner on Poston Lane
(and have been a homeowner in Huntington Beach since 1986)
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date. •3 �/�'2� \
Agenda Item No.:
t
Switzer, Donna
From: Fikes, Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 1:46 PM
To: Agenda Alerts
Subject: FW: Please vote YES on Agenda #22-123 tonight
From: Matt Shane<mattshane54@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, March 1, 2022 1:45 PM
To:Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Frakes, Sandie<Sandie.Frakes@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara
<Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik<Erik.Pete rson@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike
<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Hopkins,Travis<thopkins@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes,Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>;
Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@ surf city-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie<Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda
<Rhonda.Bolton @surfcity-hb.org>;Joyce, Sean<Sean.Joyce@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: Please vote YES on Agenda #22-123 tonight
Good afternoon.
Thank you for listening to the community's concerns. Please vote YES tonight on Agenda #22-123,
Withdrawal of Previous City Council Approval of the Edison Park Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan.
Thanks for your attention and understanding.
Best regards.
Man Shane
(28-year resident on Poston Lane and Huntington Beach resident since 1986)
9,.PPLEMENTAL
f;C'",MLINICATION
Awnao itam No.
1
Switzer, Donna
From: Sam Shane <sam.shane85@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 106 PM
To: supplementalcomm@surf city-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL; Carr, Kim; Frakes, Sandie,
Delgleize, Barbara; Peterson, Erik; Posey, Mike, Hopkins, Travis, Fikes, Cathy, Kalmick,
Dan, Moser, Natalie, Bolton, Rhonda; Joyce, Sean
Subject: Vote YES on Agenda r<22-123
Thank you for listening to my community's concerns. Please vote yes on Agenda #22-123, Withdrawal of
Previous City Council Approval of the Edison Park Reconfiguration Conceptual Plan.
We appreciate your attention and understanding.
Sincerely,
Sam Shane
- Resident of Huntington Beach
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
MwNV Daly: &/I /Z Z
4Qen0a;tram No.; a2 Q( ;2 a - J .2 3)
t
Switzer, Donna
From: Shelley Keltner <skeltner2@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 1:40 PM
Cc: Shelley Keltner; Dan Henrich
Subject: YES on Agenda Item #22-123 Consider Withdrawal of Council Approval for Edison Park
Conceptual Plan
Please vote YES on Agenda Item 22-123 to withdrawal the City Council's approval for the Edison Park
Conceptual Plan. I am a 30-year resident on Poston Lane (our street dead-ends into Edison Park). Our son
went K-6" grade at Kettler, we love this neighborhood. I remember with a great deal of fondness, taking my
son down to the playground area to play on the "ship". What great memories! Our son is 33 years old
TODAY!!
While I agree there needs to be updates and improvements to Edison Park, the Council Approved Conceptual
Plan was not fully shared with the neighborhood surrounding the park.
Please hear the residents and give the neighborhood the opportunity to weigh-in on the changes. Our park
really does need to be updated, but our voices also need to be considered.
Thank you,
Shelley Keltner
21171 Poston Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
Mobile: 714-717-6747
SUpP1..F MENTAL
COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date:_..3 f/ Z Z -
Agenda "m
t
Switzer, Donna
From: Dan Henrich <dhenrich2641@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 1:47 PM
Subject: YES on Agenda Item u22-123 Consider Withdrawal of Council Approval for Edison Park
Conceptual Plan
Please give the local neighbors time to consider and be a part of the park updates. We need the park updated,
but we also need to be a part of the process.
I have lived here on Poston for over 30 years and love our neighborhood. I know all will not be satisfied, but a
little time and compromise will go a long way.
Dan Henrich
21171 Poston Ln HB 92646
Mobile: 562-307-SS55
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMI WICATION
hA O&v, Date:--- t?l r �
409nde Iham No.: ag,Ia.D
1