HomeMy WebLinkAboutNo Action Taken - Adopt Resolution No. 2022-10 Establishing 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach,CA
92648
City of Huntington Beach TiD
Wd AZ o7
File #: 22-302 MEETING DATE: 4/19/2022
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Sean Joyce, Interim City Manager
VIA: Sean Crumby, Director of Public Works
PREPARED BY: Sean Crumby, PE, Director of Public Works
Subject:
Adopt Resolution No. 2022-10 establishing Permit Parking District "AA" affecting residents on
Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane
Statement of Issue:
Residents on Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane have petitioned the City to establish a residential
Permit Parking District "AA".
Financial Impact:
The provisions of Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) Chapter 10.42 state that residents
whom choose to participate in a residential permit parking district must pay a proportionate share of
the cost to establish or amend the district to make the district cost neutral to the City. Typical costs
include, but are not limited to, installation of signs and curb markings, initially funded in the General
Fund Signs and Marking business unit 10085302, and staff time to issue permits, funded in the
General Fund Transportation Management business unit 10085301.
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolution No. 2022-10, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Establishing Permit Parking District "AA" Within the City of Huntington Beach."
Alternative Actionts): NO ACTION
Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis: TAKEN
Residents on Lakeview Drive petitioned the City requesting establishment of a permit parking district
due to commuter vehicle parking impacts and other issues related to Huntington Beach Central Park
visitors. Attachment 1 shows the permit parking district request area located east of Edwards Street,
south of Central Park Drive. The requesting residents expressed that the parking concerns occur
daily and prevent the use of on-street parking for themselves and their guests. In addition to the
City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 4113P2022
oowerecfiQ Leg,Star`
File #: 22-302 MEETING DATE: 4/19/2022
parking impacts, other specific issues include placement of trash bins on collection day and noise
disturbances from early morning park visitors. The requested permit parking restrictions are all day,
every day, including holidays.
Following procedures in HBMC Chapter 10.42, Permit Parking Districts, the request was validated,
and determined that the concerns justify further consideration. The boundaries were examined to
ensure that this request will not move impacts to other neighboring areas. From the initially proposed
permit parking street, the area was expanded to consider including Cliffview Lane, Upperlake Circle,
and Shoreview Circle. This approach ensures that residents who could potentially be impacted by
the proposed permit parking district have an opportunity to also be included and participate in the
district. Ballots were mailed to the property owners and residents to vote on the parking district
proposal. HBMC Chapter 10.42 requires a minimum of 75% of the property units to vote in favor of
the parking district to present the request for further consideration.
Residents on Lakeview Drive combined with Cliffview Lane voted 75% in favor of establishing permit
parking. However, residents on Upperlake Circle and Shoreview Circle voted 13%, and 27% in favor,
respectively. Due to the low interest on Upperlake Circle and Shoreview Circle, these streets were
removed from consideration. The recommended permit parking district will only include Lakeview
Drive and Cliffview Lane along the west/south property side of the street as shown on Attachment 2.
The east/south side of Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane is red curbed.
As required by code, staff investigated the conditions on Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane to
examine the parking conditions and related concerns. Field observations and discussions with the
residents demonstrated that the street experiences recurring parking impacts from park users, with
the most significant impacts occurring on the weekends throughout the day. Although the noise and
trash bin issues were not observed by staff during the field reviews, several residents mentioned
these conditions to staff.
HBMC Section 10.42.040 E(3) requires that the parking district will not affect other reasonable public
uses of on-street parking, including parks and schools. In this case, the parking is adjacent to a
portion of Central Park, but also along the frontage of single-family residential homes. Central Park
in this area has two available parking lots and a moderately large parking area within Central Park
Drive in proximity to the proposed parking district. Due to the existing available park parking, after
consultation with Community and Library Services department personnel, staff believes that the
proposed parking district would not affect park use in any significant way. Therefore, staff determined
that this parking district request does meet the code section requirement regarding not affecting other
reasonable uses such as parks and schools, by the public.
Due to these conditions, staff believes findings can be demonstrated showing that commuter vehicle
parking unreasonably and regularly interferes with the use of available street parking for residents
and their guests and causes other related disturbances. Additionally it was determined that this
request would not interfere with other reasonable uses of on-street parking. These findings are
consistent with requirements of the HBMC as a basis for establishing permit parking. The number of
addresses that would comprise Permit Parking District "AA" is twelve. Notices were sent to the
affected properties and properties within 500 feet of the proposed district boundaries indicating the
date and time of the City Council meeting.
Public Works Commission Action: None required.
City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 411312022
oowereoN Leoistar'.
File #: 22-302 MEETING DATE: 4/19/2022
Environmental Status: The project is categorically exempt from CEQA.
Strategic Plan Goal: Infrastructure & Parks
Attachment(§):
1. Vicinity Map
2. Parking District Map
3. Staff Evaluation
4. Resolution 2022-10
City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 4/13/2022
oowerecOq Legis;ar-
City Council/ ACTION AGENDA April 19, 2022
Public Financing Authority
Recommended Action:
A) Approve the appointments of Scott Miller and Tim Geddes as At-Large Members of the
MHAB through August 4. 2024, the end of term for the current vacancy: and/or
B) Approve the appointment of Caroline Chase as Resident Member of the MHAB through
August 4, 2024, the end of term for the current vacancy. and/or
C) Approve the appointment of Valerie Avila as Owner Member of the MHAB through
August 4. 2024 the end of term for the current vacancy
Approved 7-0 as amended to appoint Tim Geddes as at-large member
15. 22-003 Reaffirmed adoption of Resolution No. 2021-62 finding a proclaimed
state of emergency continues to impact the ability to meet safely in
person, and allows meetings of the City Council and all City boards.
commissions and committees to be conducted remotely as needed
in compliance with new Brown Act provisions identified in Assembly
Bill 361
Recommended Action:
Reaffirm Resolution No 2021-62. -A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach. California. finding that the proclaimed state of emergency continues to impact the
ability to meet safely in person "
Approved 7-0
16. 22.302 TABLED Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-10 establishing Permit Parking
District ' AA" affecting residents on Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolution No 2022-10, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach Establishing Permit Parking District "AA" Within the City of Huntington Beach "
Item Tabled— No Action Taken
17. 22-278 Adopted Resolution No. 2022-13 authorizing the application for grant funds from
the State Department of Parks and Recreation through the Recreational Trails
Program
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolution No 2022-13. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach Approving the Application for Grant Funds from the Recreational Trails Program"
from the State Department of Parks and Recreation
Approved 7-0
18. 22-317 Approved the escheatment of Unclaimed Funds per Government Code
Sections 50050-50057
e-O� S
9
���C) �o, REQUESTED
�P BOLSA AVE. `moo PERMIT PARKING
� I V) (n V) DISTRICT
Mc FADDEN AVE.
a
U
EDINGER z -i (n AVE.
J Z 0 <
0 OHEIL � a z o AV m
o a cn
m 0 m 0 � w
a WARNER AVE.
of _
SLATER a AVE. o
Ld a 405
w 0 m
TALBERT z o AVE.
PACIFIC 9T10 o ELLIS AVE.
5� o
GARFIELD -' _ AVE.
H F H H 0
A N cn cn � H
CO YORKTOWN AVE. 3
q`sT
ADAMS AVE. F-
cn
Of
1cF INDIANAPOLIS AVE. Y
` a o
ILf
0
ATL=NTA o oz < AVE. m
c�
U W m m
w z HAMILTON AVE.
m
OCEAN y�} BANNING
AVE.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
+� VICINITY MAP ATTACHMEN"
REQUESTED PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT LOCATION 9 1
1
CENTRAL PARK DR
18011 z
18021 w
v 18031
� N
P 18051 u
c> �, 2
m m m m I0Oy`L
_ Ln n 0 1
(n D D
N m m s6
ss � aS�FE
ss S, On PSS S\O4�
J0
p, aG
V PE
INLET DR
RED CURB SOUTH SIDE EN➢PE BIOCK
PROPOSED PERMIT PARKING AREAS
NO SCALE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
•J � ATTACHMENT
PROPOSED PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT 2
Proposed Permit Parking District -
Lakeview Drive & Cliffview Lane
The requested residential permit parking street is Lakeview Drive located between Edwards Street and
Central Park Drive. Lakeview Drive is adjacent to the west side of Huntington Beach Central Park with
on-street parking permitting on the north side only. Figure 1 shows the location of the permit parking
district request in the city.
e° , s
coo ho
r
�p0 aOLSA AVE. �°o PERMIT PARKING
<1 I W REQUEST
IE Mc FADDEN VE.
U
u.
EDINGERz
a ¢-
3
_ }
M OHEIL �I _a AVE.
N a WARNER NI I .fi+ VE.
U
SLATER AVE. U
I* ¢ 405
,o TA ERT A
PACIFIC 9C�
ELLIS AVE.
GARFIELD 1 1 , J AVE.
o .
✓ V1 N N Q
O ,� Y IRNTOWN A41:, ;
Is,, �2
ADAMS AVE.
N
2
J
I Qrvcf INDIAN APOLIS AVE. x
a
OCEAN s o z it
iLAN TA `a z i AVE.
11 w 2 HAMILTON AVE.
y�Yy BANNING
AVE.
VICINITY MAP
Figure 1. Permit Parking District Request, Lakeview Drive
1 Page
93
Residents on Lakeview Drive are requesting permit parking all day, every day, including holidays due to
commuter vehicle parking impacts and related concerns from Huntington Beach Central Park visitors.
The parking impacts and concerns include park users occupying parking all day, creating a situation in
which the street cannot be used for parking by residents or their guests, place trash bins on the street
on collection days, and noise disturbances from early morning park visitors. Figure 2 shows the
requested permit parking areas on Lakeview Drive.
CENTRAL PARK DR
cp 18012 .� 18012 18011
Z
/9.
Obi 1O0 18021 W
1803 e1 18031
IT1 m 18042 /504/ i \$0
O 18041 18051
18052 Igp5\
D m m f 18051
n /n N 18062 ob
0 x _6 \ c s
18061
N n y A 18072 �, s
n A a
S
SS '
S sj Q`,\ Q
INLET DR
PROPOSED PERMIT PARKING AREAS
NO SCALE
Figure 2. Proposed Permit Parking Areas
As required by regulations of Municipal Code Chapter 10.42, Permit Parking Districts, staff reviewed
the request including the boundaries of the permit parking in the neighborhood. Staff made the
determination to include Upperlake Circle and Shoreview Circle to vote on the proposal. These streets
may be impacted should parking restrictions be implemented on Lakeview Drive and gives an
opportunity for these residents to be included in the parking district should interest exist. The code
allows staff to modify the boundaries of the proposed parking district and to send notices to the
2 1 P a g e
94
additional residents as if included with the initial request. The considered permit parking area as
modified is in Figure 3.
J
CENTRAL PARK DR
-Cy 18012 �� 18012 Z
,80 o ry iS 0 i tiry 3
18021 w
1803 �� p2 18031
rn m 180421SOO iP \a0
O 18041 M \ p 5ry 18051 J
U
n 18052 \g05 2 \$0
D I m m f 18051
A n cn N 18062 �p6 ^ \0
O I I 18061 �_ \ 9
F : 18072 6, ss
m 180"I1 s (51 601
C) J`
s3,
sS �
e
INLET DR
M STREETS CONSIDERED FOR PERMIT PARKING
NO SCALE
Figure 3. Streets Considered for Permit Parking
Ballots were mailed to the property owners and residents to vote on the permit parking proposal. Per
code, the property owner has the initial opportunity to vote. In absence of the property owner vote,
the vote of the tenant of the property is used. A summary of the results of the returned ballots is in
Table 1 and in Figure 4.
3 1 P a g e
95
Street Percent Voting "YES" for
Permit Parking
Lakeview Drive 88%
Cliffview Lane 50 %
Upperlake Circle 13 %
Shoreview Circle 27 %
Table 1 - Voting Results for Permit Parking District Proposal
CO
18012 'd 18012 18011 ■
'c9p O i ry
2' �0
�3 ' 18021 W
= 50% 5
18031 AI tti 18031
18042 �g0g1 f
18041 n L 18051
m 18052 1a0`51 27% `$°g
18051 In \a 0ti
18062 $°6x
13061 13%
18072 ss `
s �
1gol1 s so
P
10
ss
s
Figure 4. Permit Parking Voting Results.
4 Page
96
Properties fronting Lakeview Drive voted 88% in favor of the request and on Cliffview Lane, 50% voted
for permit parking. Shoreview Circle and Upperlake Circle voted 27% and 13%, respectively. Municipal
Code requires a minimum of 75% of support for the permit parking district request to move forward
for further consideration. The properties along Lakeview Drive individually, and combining Lakeview
Drive and Cliffview Lane meet the 75% support criteria with the other streets demonstrating minimal
interest in permit parking. Based on the voting results Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Drive was selected
to be the permit parking district streets for consideration.
Field observations of parking conditions:
As part of the process for evaluating a residential permit parking district request, staff conducted field
investigations of the area to examine the on-street conditions on Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane.
Weekday and weekend conditions were observed on the subject streets. The on-street parking on the
weekend was parking impacted on the northern/eastern portion or Lakeview Drive and the connecting
southern portion of Cliffview Lane where nearly all the on-street parking was occupied. Along the
central and southern/western portion of Lakeview Drive parked vehicles were observed with a few
remaining on-street spaces available. During the weekday less on-street parking occurred compared
the weekend with approximately half of the available parking area utilized. Staff observed frequent
pedestrian activity with park users crossing the street to access their parked vehicles and included
visitors fishing in the lake.
Analysis:
Municipal Code Chapter 10.42 requires staff to determine whether commuter vehicle parking regularly
interferes with the use of available on-street parking, or the unrestricted parking produces health,
safety, or welfare concerns. Staff observed parking impacts from commuter vehicles along Lakeview
Drive and Cliffview Lane, in particular on the weekend. This observation is consistent with discussions
with the requesting residents. Other resident concerns include the early morning and late evening
noise disturbances related to the on-street parking and park use. Although staff did not notice noise
disturbances during field evaluations, the issue was mentioned by a few of the requesting residents.
From these observations and discussions with the residents staff can make the finding that the
commuter vehicle parking interferes with parking for the residents and guests, and produces sources
of health, safety and welfare concerns. The requested parking restriction times are all day, every day,
including holidays.
5 1 P a g e
97
Section 10.42.040— E (3) requires that the Director of Public Works must also make the determination
that the requested Permit Parking District would not unduly affect other reasonable uses of on-street
parking, including parks, by the public. In this case, the parking is adjacent to a portion of Central Park,
but also along the frontage of single family residential homes. Central Park in this area has 2 available
parking lots and a moderately large parking area within Central Park Drive within close proximity to the
proposed parking district. Public Works consulted with the Director of Community and Library Services
to determine whether the proposed permit parking district would unduly affect park use. The Director
of Community and Library Services did not believe that the parking district would affect park use in any
significant way. Therefore, it was the determination of this analysis that this request does meet the
requirements for consideration of a permit parking district.
Staff Recommendation:
Based on staff observations and discussions with the requesting residents, staff recommends
establishing a Residential Permit Parking District along Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane all day, every
day, including holidays. Staff's opinion is that criteria specified in Municipal Code 10.42, Permit Parking
Districts, has been met for creating a new residential permit parking district for City Council
consideration. The number of affected properties is twelve (12).
6 1 P a g e
98
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I IUNTINGTON BEACH
ESTABLISHING PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT"AA" WITHIN THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH
WHEREAS,the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 4051 allowing the
establishment of parking districts in residential areas under certain conditions; and
The citizens with property frontage along the residential street known as Lakeview Drive
and Cliffview Lane have petitioned for establishment of a permit parking district; and
The Director of Public Works reviewed the petition, sent a ballot for further consideration
to residents of the petitioned street, and caused an investigation which reasonably established
that unrestricted parking; interferes with available parking or residents and guests, and produces
sources of health and safety concems;
Therefore, the Director of Public Works has found the requirements of Ordinance 4051 to
be reasonably fulfilled,and determined that the Permit Parking District will not affect other uses
on-street parking.
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
Permit Parking District"AA" is hereby established to include the above mentioned
roadway, all day, every day, including holidays.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the day of 2022.
Mayor
REVIEWED AND APPROVED APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Manager City Attorney �kW
INITIATED AND APPR
ec r of Pub or s
NO ACTION
22_11142,278129 TAKEN
Moore, Tania
From: Esparza, Patty
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 1:48 PM
To: Sam, Darren
Cc: Moore, Tania, Switzer, Donna
Subject: FW: Parking District AA CC Item Resolution
Attachments: Parking District AA Resident Communications.pdf
Thanks, Darren — these will be included in Supplemental Communications tomorrow.
Patty Esparza, C-'NfC
Assistant City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
(714) 536-5260
From: Sam, Darren <Darren.Sam@surfcity-hb.org>
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 1:45 PM
To: Esparza, Patty <PEsparza@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: RE: Parking District AA CC Item Resolution
Hello Patty,
Staff received a few comments last week via email regarding Parking District AA (City MC requires properties within 500
foot radius be notified prior to the hearing for a proposed parking district). Attached are the emails to share as late
communications.
Darren
From: Esparza, Patty<PEsparza@surfcity-hb.orR>
Sent:Tuesday, April 12, 2022 2:02 PM
To: Sam, Darren <Darren.Sam@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: RE: Parking District AA CC Item Resolution
Thanks for the quick response!
Tatty Esparza, C914C
Assistant City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
(714) 536-5260
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
From: Sam, Darren <Darren.5am@surfcity-hb.orp>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 1:53 PM VIW*V Date: Lfr)Lj I�Daa
To: Esparza, Patty<PEsparza@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: Parking District AA CC Item Resolution
1 Ag.nd.ftm No.:
Hello Patty,
Here is a scan of the Resolution with Sean's signature. I'll bring the original to the Clerk's Office this afternoon.
Darren
2
-----Original Message-----
From: Patricia Del Monaco<patricia.delmonaco@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday,April 9, 2022 5:51 PM
To: Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: proposed residential permit parking on Lakeview Drive and Cliffview Lane
I am writing to object to the permit parking on Cliffview Lane. I understand the 8 residents on Lakeview do not want cars
parked in front of their homes because they block their view of the lake, but this does not pertain to Cliffview. I do to
want to have these restrictions in front of my home on Cliffview. My gardener and housekeeper should be able to park
in front of my home and so should my friends and family. It is a public street and the public should be able to park on
the street. I do not want trucks or oil leaking cars on my driveway. I should not have to pay for a permit for family to
park in front of my house. I am disabled and I need to have cars pick me up in front of my house.
The 8 neighbors along the lake on Lakeview who do not want cars in front of their homes will affect the whole
neighborhood when cars seek parking on the adjacent streets, in front of their neighbors homes. Cars come and go and
are not parked more than a couple of hours while enjoying the public park.
Please do not pass the permit parking request on Cliffview Lane
1
From:Joyce Colliflower<joycecolliflower@yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday,April 11, 2022 10:48 AM
To:Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: Proposed residential parking permit District on Lakeview Dr.
As you know,there are 3 houses on the first block of Iakevicw Dr. I own the home at 6561 Lakeview%. As there are only 3 ofus on the
street,and both neighbors have painted their curbs red. 1 am the one affected by this and 1 strongly object.All this proposal will do is
move the public parking onto our neighbors on the culdesack streets in the tract. What are the costs to me going to be? I lave other
residents in the track had an opportunity to object? I want to know what my costs will be to implement this plan. I strongly object to
this scheme and how it is being hoisted onto my neighborhood.Joyce Colliflower
1
From: Susan Dakey<susandakey@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday,April 12, 2022 4:47 PM
To: Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: Re: Residential parking Lakeview& Cliffview letter April 6, 2022
Thank you for your quick response. We understand the situation and thank you for your explanations. We
would appreciate if the city council could possibly consider a variant in our specific case because we have no
parking in front of our house due to the 2 red curbs. We would only ask for 2 parking spaces next to our house
on Upperlake. If this is not feasible, we understand. Thank you for your time and assistance.
Tim and Sue Dakey
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022,4:22 PM Stachelski, Bob <bstachelski a surfcity-hb.ore> wrote:
Mr. and Ms. Dakey—1 will be forwarding your e-mail on to our City Council as they consider approval of the requested
permit parking district at their meeting on April 19. However, I wanted to take a moment to address some of your
points and questions.
Just to clarify, the original request was just to have permit parking along Lakeview. The City did not necessarily have a
plan to include a larger area, but we wanted to provide the opportunity for other area streets to potentially be included
in the permit parking district if it moved forward. The way we determine that is through the ballot results for each
individual street,checking to see if it meets our 75% support requirement. If not,the street is not considered for
inclusion. The level of support is a basic requirement for every permit parking district. In your case, no addresses on
Upperlake actually supported being included in the permit parking district,with the exception of the 2 corner houses at
Lakeview—you and your neighbor across the street with Lakeview addresses.
The way permit parking works is not to assign or reserve parking for anyone participating in the district. Specifically
responding to your request, even if we were to designate permit parking along your frontage on Upperlake, it wouldn't
reserve those spots for you. Through our normal policy in setting up permit parking districts, we would not designate a
small area on a street like Upperlake that is adjacent to a permit parking district as permit parking, even though the
same house has frontage on both streets. If approved, you and everyone else on Lakeview and Cliffview would be
eligible to purchase permits and park in any of the restricted zones on either street. All of the parking on Upperlake
and Shoreview would remain public parking as it is today.
1
I understand that you would advocate for having all of Upperlake be part of the permit parking district to address the
issues you identified. However, our permit parking policy is not to impose permit parking districts on neighborhoods
that don't demonstrate a desire to impose those restrictions on themselves. In this case, only 2 of the 16 properties
that front Upperlake voted in support of permit parking. The same was essentially true with Shoreview, though the
numbers were slightly different as a shorter street.
There may be other avenues for you to pursue regarding any"camping" on the street by homeless people or others
through our Homeless Service group or possibly our Police Department. They have several potential resources to try to
assist people and help address neighborhood issues. I would encourage you to contact them. You can find the contact
information for Homeless Services on the City's website under"Services" and Police Department contacts under the
Police Department tab.
I realize that this response will be disappointing since we are not able to accommodate your request. If you'd like, I'd
be happy to speak with you by phone to answer any additional questions you may have or clarify any elements of my
response.
Sincerely,
Bob Stachelski
Transportation Manager
714.536.5523
From: Susan Dakey<susandakev@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 9:25 AM
To:Sam, Darren<Darren.Sam@surfcity-hb.org>
Cc: Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: Residential parking Lakeview& Cliffview letter April 6, 2022
Darren and Robert,
We received your April 6, 2022 letter Proposed Establishment of residential permit parking on Lakeview Drive
and Cliffvicw Lane.
We supported the original plan in %our letter Nov. 22. 2021. that included Upperlake Circle and Shoreview
Circle. However, you removed Upperlake Circle and Shoreview Circle from the plan.
We live at 6581 Lakeview Drive, on the comer at Upperlake Circle. We have a red curb in front of our house
on Lakeview, and a red curb between our house and the house next door at 6591 Lakeview. The red curbs will
remain as they are both small spots, not large enough for parking.
2
Se, we were hoping to get 2 parking spots on the side of our house on Upperlake Circle. We don't have any
parking spots on Lakeview. and need 2 spots on Upperlake Circle. Would it be possible to include just our-)
parking spots next to our house on Upperlake Circle at the comer of Lakeview Drive at this time'?
Problems on Upperlake Circle and other streets-
Since you stopped overnight parking on Central Park Drive, homeless and fishermen park nest to our homes
constantly overnight. There is so much overnight homeless parking and fishermen parking on Upperlake
Circle. Including Upperlake Circle in the plan would help alleviate all that unwanted overnight illegal parking.
No one should be fishing at the lake past I Opm, and no one should be parking overnight nest to our homes.
Thank you ter your help. If you want to ask us questions. please feel free to email or call us at 714-596-7646.
Tim and Sue Dakey
3
From: Rick Fee <e46rick@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 8:12 PM
To: Sam, Darren
Cc: Stachelski, Bob
Subject: Re: Proposed Residential Permit Parking Lakeview Dr. and Cliffview Ln.
Hello Mr. Sam.
Thank you for the detailed response. Upon further consideration, we're still in favor of this proposal even though it's
changed considerably from what we voted on. We're especially glad to hear the time has changed to 24 hours. Night
parking has actually been the bigger problem from our perspective. This modified proposal however will have a negative
impact on the two adjacent cul-de-sacs. It will inevitably push park goers onto the cul-de-sacs searching for legal parking.
The changes to this proposal will likely have some cul-de-sac residents regretting their NO votes.
Regarding the actual parking permits. Will we be able to purchase permits even though we're not addressed on one of the
two streets identified in the proposal? Our Shoreview address for example is a corner house which is bordered on one
side by Lakeview Dr. We have no curb parking in front of our home due to a fire hydrant. So we regularly park a vehicle
on the side of our property which is Lakeview Dr. Our address is unique. Even though we're not addressed on Lakeview.
our property shares a border with it. and we'll be directly impacted by this plan. With this in mind. I'd hope and expect the
city would make parking passes available to us so we can continue to park alongside our property as we've done for over
30 years.
Thank you,
Rick
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022, 05 17 29 PM PDT, Sam, Darren <darren sam@surfcity-hb.org> wrote.
Mr. Fee.
Thank you for submitting your concerns. Municipal Code Chapter 10.42, Permit Parking Districts, requires that
75% of the residents be in support of permit parking to move the request for further consideration. Of the
streets that received ballots to vote on the proposal, only the properties fronting Lakeview Drive combined with
Cliftview Lane voted a minimum of 75% in favor of permit parking. The cul-de-sac streets. Upperlake Circle
and Shoreview Circle did not receive the 75% minimum support. therefore, were not included in the final
proposed streets to establish permit parking.
The initial permit parking request was on Lakeview Drive. Since the parking issues may potentially move to
nearby streets should a parking district be established, staff as allowed by code, determined to include the
other nearby streets in the neighborhood to provide the opportunity to join the permit parking request should
enough of the residents be interested. However, Upperlake Circle and Shoreview Circle residents did not
provide a sufficient number of"Yes" votes to be included with the initial request.
t
Attached is the first letter sent to the residents to vote on permit parking. This letter did state the permit
parking times from 7 am to 6 pm, every day Subsequent to that letter, residents organizing the permit parking
proposal requested the times changed to all-day (24hrs) and had indicated that all the neighbors agreed.
Please contact me if you have questions. Your communication will be shared at the City Council meeting next
week.
Darren Sam
City of Huntington Beach, Public Works
(714) 374-1619
darren sam(d)surfcity-hb.oro
From: Rick Fee <e46nck(&yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 5:59 PM
To: Stachelski. Bob <bstachelskiAsurfcity-hb.orq>
Subject: Proposed Residential Permit Parking Lakeview Dr. and Cliffview Ln.
Hello Mr. Stachelski,
My Name is Rick Fee. My wife. Jenny and I Irve at 18062 Shoreview Circle in the neighborhood where this proposed
permit parking is being considered. We are confused because this proposal appears to be different than what the city
asked to vote on months back. We understood the permit parking would also include the two cul de sacs immediately
adjacent to Lakeview and Cliffview (Upperlake Circle and Shoreview Circle). Also the hours identified in the current
proposal are different than what we recall voting on. Have things changed from what the city originally asked us to vote
on?
We voted in support the plan as it was originally proposed to us. The plan as proposed now is different than what we
recall voting on. With permit parking only on the two streets fronting the lake. (Lakeview and Cliffview)-this will just push
the park visitors on to the two adjacent cut de sacs to find parking instead where we already have very limited parking.
Had we understood this was the plan from the beginning. I doubt we would've have voted in favor of the proposal.
Unfortunately we didn't save any of the original paperwork explaining the exact details of what we were voting on. So we
only have our memory to compare the current proposal to what was presented to us months ago Has the current
proposal changed from what the city asked the residents to vote on? If so. why?
Thank you.
2
Rick Fee
3
From: cneedham <cneedham@socal.rr.com>
Sent:Thursday,April 14, 2022 11:44 AM
To: Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject:Objection to Proposed parking permits on Lakeview Dr and Cliffview Lane
Dear Mr. Stachelski,
I am Carol Needham and I live on Clearwater Cir in the neighborhood off the above listed streets. I am opposed to
permit parking.This is not private property.The city has created a spectacular park environment and encourages people
to come. Parking restrictions are unnecessary.There is no inherent danger or traffic issues. Let our visitors come and
not have to worry about a parking ticket.
Regards,
Daniel And Carol Needham
18042 Clearwater Circle
HB, Ca
t