HomeMy WebLinkAboutProposed FY 2022/23 Budget Review 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach,CA
92648
_ r
City of Huntington Beach
File #: 22-399 MEETIN DATE: 5/17/2022
Proposed FY 2022/23 Budget Review
City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 5/11/2022
10 powered by LegistarTM
wATINGTp
(� T
► �N0OPORAFo
City of Huntington Beach
= Proposed FY 2022/23 Budget Review
City Council Study Session
F F - = o O� May 17, 2022
B. 17 1 q 09 P `�
C_ 00UNT`I cP�
Presentation Overview
• FY 2021/22 General Fund Budget Update
• Proposed FY 2022/23 General Fund Budget Review
• Proposed FY 2022/23 Capital Improvement Budget Review
• Key City Council Policy Considerations for FY 2022/23
• Next Steps — FY 2022/23 Budget Approval
tt--��NT I Nor
O` MCOIIYOM.IT°0
_ F9fT
� _ x
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
DUN" 2
Meng Ike: ��/Z132,22-
Ages ram No.: ss #1 , as -3�i9�
\\NT I N G To
�pRPORAT
_- `1 = FY 2021/22 General Fund
-;�;- Q Budget Update
�� _
?^ B. 17, 19 Z P `�
c�IJNT`I CPS
Economic Overview & Local Budgetary Impacts
• Economic trends indicate a continued economic recovery from the financial impacts
of COVID-19,but a recent decline in GDP signal caution
➢ U.S.real GDP increased 2.3%in Q3 2021,6.9%in Q4 2021,-1.4%in Q1 2022
Slight decline in the last quarter due to Omicron restrictions in some parts of the country and
a scale back of government assistance payments
➢ According to UCLA Anderson Forecast(April 2022)—Orange County
Labor markets and tourism is nearly restored to pre-pandemic levels and is expected to
continue with a strong outlook
Development surge is expected to continue
Housing will face some headwinds due to recent steep price escalation
• As we emerge from the economic impacts of the pandemic,the City is monitoring
recent developments in the economy:
Russia/Ukraine Crisis r�NTINGLO
➢ Inflation&Prices pF \NCOFFUB4IF� �Y�
➢ Supply Chain Challenges F9�
➢ Rising Interest Rates
➢ Labor Shortages
��DUNTY rt. ,
City Budget & Fiscal Position
We are projecting a FY 21-22 surplus with modest surpluses over the next four years as a result of key
financial decisions made by City Council and the ongoing recovery from the COVID-19 economic downturn.
➢ FY2020-21 concluded with a$5.2M surplus, after year-end transfers($10.9M surplus prior to transfers)
• City Council approved additional investments of$4.4M into capital infrastructure and$1.3M of
essential capital equipment needs from the year-end surplus.
FY2021-22 is projected to conclude with a$3.4M surplus(subject to change)
➢ Historic Infrastructure Investments in FY2021-22
➢ General Fund transfer to the Infrastructure Fund increased by 130%to$11.5M.
ANT I NGTA,
➢ CIP budget increased 57%to$39.3M NGCRYUgq)E O'v�
U 2
➢ Additional One-Time Funding --
➢ City received$29.6M through the American Rescue Plan Act. City Council
approved an expenditure plan to invest funds in projects. cF�DUNTV
s
vNT I N G T�
(� �pRPORgT
Proposed FY 2022-23
General Fund Budget Review
�j� B• 11, 1909 P `�
��IJNT`I cP�
FY 2022/23 General Fund Proposed Budget Review
• Proposed FY 2022/23 General Fund Budget is structurally balanced,with a projected
$1 M surplus
General Fund(Fund rr Proposed
(in thousands)
Revenue(Recurring) $253,552
Personnel Costs 169,892
Operating Costs 48,217
Non-Operating Costs* 34,403
Total Expenditures 252,512
Surplus $1,040
Includes Debt Service,Capital Expenditure,and Transfers
• Continued Infrastructure Investments in FY2022/23
> General Fund transfer to the Infrastructure Fund increased by 17%to$13.5M
➢ CIP budget increased 52%to$59.7M
FY 2022/23 General Fund Proposed Revenues - $253.6M
Revenue from Other Charges for Current Other Revenue Non-Operating Revenue
Services 0.6% 0.2%
Agencies 10.3%
1.1%
Use of Money&Property
6.7%
Fines&Forfeitures Property Tax
1.8% 38.8%
License&Permits
3.2%
Utility Users Tax
7.3% NT GT
A I N
Transient Occupancy Tax � 0jjj
5.7% Oct \Ncosroeq reo
F9
Franchises
3.4%
Sales Tax CD
21.0% FB
r,00 V CPS 8
FY 2022/23 General Fund Budget Revenues - $253.6M
• General Fund revenues anticipated to increase by$8.3 million
General Fund Revenue(in millions)
$260
$253.6
QcoveN +3 A%
$250 EconOm�c R $2as.3
Oec/it' +3 5%
$240 $236.0 CO��tO +5.2% 5237.0
$230 0$225.2
$220
$210 � WING
Tpy
O rc°xv°xnrea
$200 _ Cy
FY18/19 Actual Pre- FY19/20 Actual FY20/21 Actual FY21/22 Projected FY22/23 Proposed -
COVID
�U1UNT1 CPS 9
FY 2022/23 General Fund Budget Revenues - $253.6M
• Major revenue variances include:
➢ Property Tax: $98.3 million (5.7%or$5.3 million increase)
Higher assessed valuations as of January 1, 2022 versus prior fiscal year
➢ Sales Tax: $53.3 million(2.1%or$1.1 million increase)
- Increase due to strong consumer demand across all industry groups and increased prices
➢ Transient Occupancy Tax: $14.5 million(8.2%or$1.1 million increase)
- Reduced travel restrictions expected to fuel increased local tourism to Huntington Beach,
exceeding pre-COVID-19 revenues of$14 million in FY2018/19
➢ Revenue from Other Agencies: $2.7 million(-26.7%or$1 million decrease)
- Strike team reimbursements are not included in the FY2022/23 budget, but are included in the
FY2021/22 projected revenues
➢ Charges for Current Services: $26 million (4.9%or$1.2 million increase)
- Primarily attributed to increases in Emergency Medical Services Transports and Billing Rates
Fee Adjustment Update
• The FY 2022/23 Proposed Budget does not include revenues from potential fee adjustments
• March 1, 2022-City Council directed staff to review the Master Fees and Charges Schedule and
review the results with the Finance Commission for recommendation prior to City Council
Consideration.
• March to May-Finance staff is working with the City's fee consultant and other departments to
develop recommended fee adjustments based on CPI adjustments and market rate analysis
• May 25, 2022—Finance Commission meeting to review potential changes to the Master Fees and
Charges
• June 7, 2022—Review fee adjustment recommendations with City Council for consideration
%11NGro
�4 Mc°avongrEa ��
C OOUNTY
FY 2022/23 General Fund Proposed Revenues
�(,in thousands)
Property Tax 92,938 98,259 5,321 5.7%
Sales Tax 52,265 53,343 1,079 2.1%
Franchises 8,536 8,604 68 0.8%
Transient Occupancy Tax 13,371 14,471 1,100 8.2%
Utility Users Tax 18,457 18,457 - 0.0%
License&Permits 8,016 8,201 185 2.3%
Fines&Forfeitures 4,516 4,534 18 0.4%
Use of Money&Property 16,807 16,887 80 0.5%
Revenue from Other Agencies 3,712 2,721 (990) -26.7 �OIIYORAr
% t�uN11NGjOynn O\ NfO v
Charges for Current Services 24,820 26,026 1,207 4.9% 9
c.� x
Other Revenue 1,368 1,604 235 17.2% -
Non-Operating Revenue 446 444 (2) -0.4%
Total 245,261 253,552 8,302 3.4°k FOOUNTY CP��
iz
FY 2022/23 General Fund Proposed Expenditures - $252.5M
USES OF FUNDS BY DEPARTMENT
Transfers* Public Works Other— Administrative Community
11.6% 8.3% 3.0% Services Development
4.0% 4.1%
Debt Service Community&
Library Services 7 4%
5.7%
Finance
2.6%
Polim
31.9%
Operating
Expenses Personnel Fire
19.1% Services 20.8%
61.9%
Non-Departmental
19.6%
Transfers include Infrastructure,Equipment,General Liability& "Other includes City Council,City Manager,
Section 115 Trust Transfers City Attorney,City Clerk,and City Treasurer
Recommended FY 2022/23 Authorized Positions
• Staff is proposing 4 new General Fund positions in the FY 2022/23 Budget:
City Clerk Department
— (1) Records Specialist to manage public records requests
City Manager Department
— (1) Executive Assistant to provide administrative support to the City Manager and Assistant
City Manager—restore eliminated position
— (1)Social Worker to assist with the growing Homeless caseload within the Homeless and
Behavioral Health Division
— Transfer non-sworn Homeless and Behavioral staff from the Police Department to the City
Manager's Office
Finance Department <��NTINGT�
Ol \MtOM04)FO
— (1)Accounting Technician II to process accounts payable invoices and serve as v
a concierge at City Hall—partially restore accounts payable position eliminated
as part of SIP ram„ Q
q�Cr fFell.1909.i� \�QQ
COUN P� 14
Recommended FY 2022/23 Authorized Positions
• Staff is proposing a net addition of 5 Other Fund positions in the FY 2022/23 Budget:
Public Works Department
Position Reductions(3)
— Eliminate(2)Water Meter Readers and(1)Water Meter Repair Technician due to implementation of the
Automated Water Meter Infrastructure.
Position Additions(7)
— Add(1)Field Service Representative, (1)Water Distribution Maintenance Leadworker, (1)Water
Equipment Operator, (1)Water Systems Technician III,and(1)Water Utility Locator to enhance water
system maintenance,focus on air quality mandates and Water Production and Flood Control reporting,
and address the high volume of service requests.
— (1)Traffic Maintenance Service Worker to improve traffic signal maintenance response
— (1)Contract Administrator to administer construction contracts within the approved Capital
Improvement Program(CIP)
Finance Department
— (1)Senior Accounting Technician in the Finance Department to provide customer service, billing, and
system maintenance and implementation support for the City's municipal services team(water,sewer, and
trash)
FY 2022/23 Full Time Equivalent — All Funds
1.000.00
Proposed
995.00 Budget
Pre-COVID 089.75
990.00 987.25
986.25 986.25 986.25
985.00 983.75 �/"•�--
980.75
980.00 978.25
975.00 972.75
970.00
965.00
960.00
958.25
955.00
Restructure
950.00 Plan
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23
16
Pension Update
• March 2021, City Council approved refinancing 85% of our pre-existing pension
debt at a historically low interest rate of 2.925% allowing the City to save 166_7
million during the next 24-year period
• HB's annual pension payments are anticipated to be up to $17.4M less than if we
did not refinance
• FY22/23 Pension Payment $28M vs. $37.7M yielding $9.7M Savings!
• CaIPERS return in FY20/21 was 21.3%:
✓ CaIPERS Funding level 102.8%vs. 76.7%funded
✓ No UAL payment required in FY23/24
• Refinancing will be the better option as long as in the long term CaIPERS is able
to maintain a market rate of return greater than 2.925% (CaIPERS target 6.8%)
• As part of our pension debt refinancing plan, the City also adopted an Unfunded
Accrued Liability Pension Funding Policy, which mandates that we set-aside
additional funds to payoff any new future pension debt
• A$1.4 million transfer is included in the proposed FY 2022/23 budget to
prefund pension liabilities via our Section 115 Trust
Pension Payment Comparison with and without Refinancing
Pension Payment Amounts
FY 2021122-FY 2030131
50
45
- 40
- 35
No UAL Future UAL payments dependent on CaIPERS return 30
21.3%CaIPERS
c
Return FY20/21 2.5
20
is
10
5
0
FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31
UAL 5,471,553 5,471,553 0 5,471,553 5,471,553 5,471,553 5,471,553 5,471,553 5,471,553 5,471,553
POB 22,571,894 22,571,365 22,569,834 22,576,076 22,569,314 22,573,775 22,568,519 22,571,680 22,570,145 22,570,992
--- UAL $34,914,927 $37,718,694 $39,496,628 $41,460,002 $40,678,545 $41,846,298 $43,012,009 $43,045,744 $44,244,443 45,476,104
w/0 POB
18
Financial Outlook
General Fund(Fund 100) Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected
Revenue(Recurring) $245,251 $253,552 $257,487 $261 997 $266 605
Personnel Costs 164,431 169,892 171,090 173,566 176,032
i
Operating Costs 43,658 48,217 49,618 51,085 52,577
Non-Operating Costs* 33,767 34,403 35,735 36,339 36,991
Total Expenditures 241,856 252,512 256,443 260,990 265,600
Surplus $3,395 $1,040 $1,044 $1,007 $1,005'
'Includes Debt Service,Capital Expenditures,and Transfers
vNT I N G TO
�ORPORgT
�N Fo FY 2022/2023
_ Capital Improvement
r = Program (CIP) Review
— —`-- Ilk-
�j� B• 11, 1909 P `�
CpUNTy �p�-
STRATEGIC PLAN
GOAL � Pl R[ CKnRRV -
1
INFRASTRUCTURE AND
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
NT I NGTO
�` \HCOP/ON4TE ��
9
UNTY CPS\
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
• Drainage and Stormwater 5 projects $2M
• Facilities 20 projects $6M
• Neighborhood 7 projects $11 M
• Parks and Beaches 20 projects $11 M
• Sewer 4 projects $9M
• Streets and Transportation 26 projects $15M
• Water 9 projects $8M
STARTED OR COMPLETED 91 OF 105 PROJECTS
VALUED AT $62M!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FACILITIES
• Rodgers' Senior Center Site Development ($2.4M) in progress
• HCP Sports Complex Lighting ($477k)
• Replace R22 AC Equipment ($150k)
r
f
� � r
fhot. Rooftop chiller
_.. 23
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
PARKS & BEACHES
• Bluff Top Park Improvements ($3.5M) 1 c
• Phase 1 Railing — complete `
• Phase 2 Path - underway
w
t.
a
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
PARKS & BEACHES
• Central Park Restroom ($600k)
• Central Park Playground Equipment ($1.3M)
• Lake Park Improvements ($650k)
• Beach Parking Lot ($1.5M) r
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
STREETS (AVG PCI = 79) y
• Rehabilitating 2 miles of arterials ($5.4M)
• Springdale/Edinger/Saybrook/Newland/Warner
• Zone 5 Maintenance (Completed 11 of 12 Zones) -
• Overlay 8 miles of residential streets ($3.1M) :�
Construction in April
• Slurry 7 miles of residential streets ($500k)
Construction in April.
• Added over 200 new ADA ramps ($1 M)
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
SEWER
• Slater Lift Station
Rehab completed
• Saybrook Lift Station
nearly complete
($9.5M)
• Sewer Lining ($1.OM)
llfi �
27
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
WATER
• EdwardsNarsity Watermain Project ($2.5M)
t
4
iM� III
Y
K y
40e sae
7 r i
28
FY 22/23 CIP BUDGET
➢Budget
➢New Appropriations: $ 60 M ($25M 2 yrs ago)
➢Continuing Appropriations: 6 M
Total $ 66 M
➢Funding sources proposed:
➢General lnfrastructure Fund
➢Enterprise Funds (Water and Sewer)
➢Special Revenue Funds (Measure M, Gas Tax, Prop 42, RMRA,
AQMD, PEG, Park & PD DIF, Quimby)
➢Grants (CDBG, Prop 68)
i
CIP FUNDING SOURCES
Capital Improvement Program FV 2022/23
New Appropriations by Funding Source
$59,680,511
Water Funds RMRA Park Funds Gas Tax/Prop 42
6% g% 2i S%
C,rants/O'.
Zt'-
Infrastructure Measure M
Fund 4%
35% Sewer Funds
14%
30
STORM DRAIN INFRASTRUCTURE
114 Miles of Pipelines
5.3 Mi. of Open Channels
15 Flood Control Stations
1,847 Catch Basins 1,128 Manholes
DRAINAGE $12.8M
• Heil Avenue Storm Water Pump Station $11 M
• Repairs to Channel C6 SC1 $120k
• Storm Drain PS Building Improvements$300k
• Storm Drain PS Forebay Improvements$300k o�
• Half Round Grates$300k
• McCallen Storm Drain Trash Removal$810k �. �,
FACILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE
.. „ . 8 Fuel Islands
300+ Facilities/Structures ,T
(Community Centers, Fire
Stations, Restrooms, Pier,
Libraries, Senior Center etc.)
16 Underground Fuel Tanks
FACILITIES $13.2M
• Joint Youth Training Center$2M
• Central Library Children-Teen Concept Plan $350k
• Oak View Community Center Rehab $2M
• Warner Parking Lot Rehab$340k
• Civic Center UST Replacement$1.2M
• Civic Center Generator and Main Switchgear$1.4M
• Roof Replacement City Yard Bldg "A"$155k
dM —IX
1
FACILITIES (Cont.)
• PD Heliport Hangar(Design) $200k
• PD Comm. Center Remodel $1.21VI
• PD Traffic Office Remodel $415k
• PD Women's Locker Room (Design) $145k
• Replace R22 AC Equipment$165k
• World Skatepark Development Planning $750k
• Oil Production Abandonment$750k
�v
IN
NEIGHBORHOOD INFRASTRUCTURE
AM
"Wz
316 Miles of Residential Streets 33 Miles of Alleys
(HB to Yosemite)
1 ,
632 Miles of Sidewalk/Parkway 4,430,000 SF of
(HB to Provo Utah) Parking Lots
NEIGHBORHOOD $4.2M
• Residential Curb Ramps $665k
• Residential Overlay $3.5M
Lj
i M
Zone 2 r�
37
PARKS AND BEACHES
lie-
3.6 Miles of Beach 1.5 Miles of Beach/Sunset Beach
(Beach Boulevard to (Warner to Anderson Street)
Seapoint)
70+ Parks
PARKS AND BEACHES $2.4M
• Huntington Bluffs Stabilization Project $400k
• Carr Park Improvements (Design) $355k
• Edison Park Reconfiguration (Design) $475k
• Playground Equipment $750k
Huntington Central Park at Slater
• Marina Park Reconfiguration (Design) $440k
I �
SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE
MipTZM'AI 9(M
n15CAC iN
52,000 JCP. .,F q9
Service Laterals
L _
.;; CCTV Sewer Mains
360 Miles of Pipelines
5.
27 Lift Stations
7,700 Manholes
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $8.2M
• Sewer Lift Station Improvements $4.9M
• Sewer Lining —Various Locations $1.4M
• Edinger Sewer, Murdy Channel $1.9M
i
.,m.t. 41
STREETS AND TRANSPORTATION
100 Miles of 316 Miles of Residential Streets 33 Miles of Alleys
Arterial Streets (HB to Yosemite)
4,430,000 SF of
3,765 Park, Parking
Parkin
` g Lots Lot, & Street Lights
78 Miles of Bike Lanes
19 Miles of Bike/Pedestrian Paths 143 Signalized Intersections G;
STREETS & TRANSPORTATION (CONT.)
(86-100)
Good I 2008 2006 i 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
(75-85)
KVAH ! 54.1 642 j 64.7 76.4 76.4 76.5 74.7 I 76.1 80.2 Fair (60-74)
....._..__........_._.......:-............__................._:......._.............__........--.........._...................._........................._...................................._'.....................................a._...._............_....._...;...._.........._.._......._....:.._...___
Local ; 68.1 64.0 62.6 71.6 72.1 78.7 77.6 1 76.5 77
Citywide 77.976.9 Poor (41-59)
STREETS & TRANSPORTATION $16.9M
• Arterial Rehabilitation $5.6M
• Arterial Beautification $1 M
• Downtown Revitalization Improvements $1.8M
• Downtown Street Lighting $650k
• Fiber Optic Projects $1.1 M
(Garfield, Gothard, Central Library, Bella Terra PD Substation)
Arterial Rehab—Before Arterial Rehab—After
44
STREETS & TRANSPORTATION (CONT.)
• Heil Fire Station Signal Improvements $290k
• TS Synchronization — Bolsa $20k
• Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program $500k
• Bridge Rehabilitation $3.8M
• Goldenwest Median Turf Replacement $175k
• Citywide Mobility and Corridor Improvements $2M
p� y
A"
as
WATER INFRASTRUCTURE
5
611 Miles of Large &
1 5
Distribution Mains 20 Miles of Shared 10 Wells (8 Active)
Mains
17,749 Valves 53,091 Meters
4 Reservoirs - 55 MG Storage 5,801 Hydrants
WATER IMPROVEMENTS $3.3M
• Water Well No. 9 Roof Redesign Project $468k
• Water Well No. 4 Facility Upgrades $1.5M
• Water Main Replacement Projects $1.25M
• Water Production Building Rehabilitation $83k
'; 7 '
a
�N1 i N G T�
,p9PORAT
. = Key City Council Policy
Considerations for
FY 2022/23
?� 6, 17, 1909 P �`
C_ "oUNTy �P�,
City Council Policy Direction Needed
• There are several possible budgetary adjustments that require additional City Council
deliberation
1)American Rescue Plan Act
2) Review of Projects Requiring Additional Funding
3)Circuit Ride Share Program
NI I NGT0
OF N'ORP �TfO�61
n
c.� x
92c���UNTY CP�\�OQ a9
American Rescue Plan Act
• The$1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act(ARPA)delivered$350 billion to state,local,territorial,
and tribal governments in response to COVID-19.
• Huntington Beach will be receiving$29.6 million,split into two equal payments:
— $14.8 million was received in May 2021
— $14.8 million allocation payment is expected in May 2022
• On September 7,2021,City Council approved an ARPA spending plan.
• Under ARPA guidelines,the City has identified$52.7 million in lost revenue allowing the City
broad latitude to deploy the funds for governmental services.
• Recent efforts on the Federal level have been made to claw back unspent ARPA payments.
Those efforts were unsuccessful.
• To minimize the risk of future claw back efforts,staff recommends the ARPA funds be fully
expended for eligible police and fire personnel costs in FY 2022/23.
• General Fund budget savings will be available to fund a newly established Huntington Beach
Recovery Reserve to accomplish City Council's priorities approved on September 7, 2021.
FY 2022/23 General Fund Proposed Budget with ARPA Change
• Proposed FY 2022/23 General Fund Budget with ARPA administrative change
and establishment of Huntington Beach Recovery Reserves
General Fund(Fund 100)
(in thousands)
Revenues(Recurring) $253,552
ARPA Funds 29,607
Total Revenues 283,159
Personnel Costs 169,892
Operating Costs 48,217
Non-Operating Costs 34,403
HB Recovery Projects 16,136 N11NGT02
1:n
0` `N�.PPOA4,E0
Total Expenditures 268,647 F9n
U S
HB Recovery Reserves 13,472
Surplus $1,040 _
9yc�00UNTY CP�\�oe si
Huntington Beach Recovery Projects
Description - .-
Downtown Revitalization Improvements Planning $1,750
Joint Youth Training Center for Fire and Police Capital 2,000
Planning+
Oak View Library/Community Center Rehabilitation Capital 2,000
World Skatepark Development Planning 750
Carr Park Improvements Planning 355
Arterial Beautification Capital 1,000
Planning+
Citywide Mobility&Corridor Improvements Capital 2,000
Garfield and Gothard Avenues Fiber Optics Capital 1,000
Police Technology Infrastructure Improvement Capital 3,000
Public Safety Equipment(USAR Truck, Rescue Boat) Capital 2,000
Seniors-on-the-Go Transportation Improvement Capital 280
HB Recovery Projects-FY2022/23 Proposed Budget 16,135
52
Huntington Beach Recovery Projects
Description
Planning+
Comprehensive Homeless Response Plan Implementation Capital 2,500
Major City Facility Upgrade Project Planning 3,200
Permanent Supportive Housing Capital 2,500
Grow HB Fund Capital 2,000
HB Community Impact Loan Fund Capital 1,000
Economic Development Fund Capital 2,000
Unallocated(Talbert Channel Multi-Use Recreation Trail Project) Unallocated 272
HB Recovery Reserves—City Council approval to appropriate funds
will be requested at a later date 13,472
Total HB Recovery Projects $29,607
53
Review of Projects Requiring Additional Funding
. .Descri • ERWITTIM. • • -
Downtown Revitalization Improvements* $1.75M $8.2M-$17.3M General
Grants/Public
Private
Oak View Library/Community Center Rehabilitation* $2M $15M-$20M Partnership
Comprehensive Homeless Response Plan Implementation/
Healing Center $2.5M $50M-$80M Grants/Housing
m Combine with
Permanent Supportive Housing/Healing Center = $2.5M Healing Center Grants/Housing
Q Future Park
Carr Park Improvements* $355K $3.6M DIF/Grants
Public Private
World Skatepark Development* ¢ $750K TBD Partnership
Public Private
Major City Facility Upgrade Project $3.2M TBD Partnership
Future Park
Edison Park Improvements* li $475K TBD DIF/Grants
Huntington Beach Blufftop Stabilization^ v $400K $1 M-$1.5M Grants
Oil Well Abandonment*^ $500K TBD General
• The projects listed above in most cases cover only the planning phase and will require additional
funding for the construction phase of the project
*Included in FY2022/23 Proposed Budget
^Funded in Prior Fiscal Year
54
Possible Funding Sources for Projects
• Possible Funding Sources for these projects include:
—Strategic Initiatives Reserves$16.5M
—Unallocated funds originally allocated to the Talbert Channel Trail Project$272K
—General Fund estimated surplus of$3.4M in the current year and$1M annually in future years
—Proceeds from Prior City Manager Housing Agreement of$1.66M
—CA Superior Court decision in favor of the City related to the dissolution of former RDA$5.2M($1.5M GF,$3.7M Housing Fund)
—State and Federal Grants for Oak View,Healing Center/Permanent Supportive Housing,Blufftop,and Park Projects
—Future Park Development Impact Fee Funding
—Public and Private Partnerships
•$23.1M General Fund,$3.7M Housing Funds,Annual$1M GF Surplus,and$272K HB Recovery Funds
•$78M-$122M of estimated cost of projects with 4 capital projects with undetermined costs
•Council feedback is requested to determine project priorities requiring additional funding
• Feedback request for the following:
—Funding priorities for the$23.1M General Fund,Annual$1M GF Surplus,and$272K HB Recovery Funds
—Set-aside$3.7M in Housing Funds for the Healing Center
—Set-aside current year surplus,proceeds from City Manager Housing Agreement,and RDA legal proceeds in the Strategic
Initiative Reserve to fund City Council priorities
Circuit Ride Share Program
• On July 13, 2021,the City launched a Circuit Pilot Program which I
provides free rides to visitors and residents within Downtown + .
Huntington Beach using the Ride Circuit app ,;-
• The pilot program ends on June 30, 2022
• 4-5 HB Circuit all-electric, low-speed, six-seat golf carts
Based on 9 Months of Service:
Monthly ridership range—6,910 to 10,614
Average monthly ridership-8,619
Average wait time-7:44 minutes
Survey Summary from December 2021—March 2022
Responses from 742 riders:
• 678(91%) are HB residents
Bcach
• 728(98%)want to keep this service
• 605 (82%) used the service to visit local restaurants
and businesses
• Most common response was"it's free and electric'
sE,
Circuit Ride Share Program
• = - • 2022-2023 Schedule
July 1-June 30
14,
Hours of Operation
Monday:Closed
ETuesday-Thursday: m-10ppm
..- Friday-Saturday:loam-lOpm
Sunday:loam-9pm..•""' April-October:5 vehicles,310 weekly hours
Total Contract Cost: $474,000 November-March:4 vehicles,248 weekly hours
Total Cost to the City: $350,000
• City will seek to offset costs by pursuing grant funding, private sponsorship,and
advertising revenue
• Council feedback is requested to determine if$350K of$1 M surplus is used to fund the
Circuit Ride Share Program
WATINGTD
�pRP0Rgr
1 �� FD
C FY 2022-23 Budget —
__ Next Steps
coUNTy �P�
City Council Feedback
• City Council feedback of the proposed FY 2022/23 Budget is requested,especially
as it relates to:
1)American Rescue Plan Act
— To minimize the risk of future claw back efforts, staff recommends the ARPA funds be fully
expended for eligible police and fire personnel costs in FY 2022/23.
— General Fund budget savings will be available to fund a newly established Huntington Beach
Recovery Reserve to accomplish City Council's priorities approved on September 7,2021.
2)Review of Projects Requiring Additional Funding—feedback requested for the following:
—Funding priorities for the$23.1M General Fund,Annual$1M GF Surplus,and$272K HB
Recovery Funds
—Set-aside$3.7M in Housing Funds for the Healing Center
—Set-aside current year surplus,proceeds from City Manager Housing Agreement,and RDA ��\NTINUr�2
legal proceeds in the Strategic Initiative Reserve to fund City Council priorities of rtoerua„F,
3)Circuit Ride Share Program �9n
U S
—Council feedback is requested to determine if$350K of$1 M surplus is used to fund Circuit
Ride Share Program y
�UUN � 59
FY 2022/23 Budget Next Steps
• Based on City Council feedback tonight, staff will make requisite
adjustments to the proposed FY 2022/23 Budget
• Revised budget will be brought back for formal City Council
consideration / adoption on June 7th
%IINcro2
F
V S
��DUNTY CP�� 60