Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApprove Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 - Resoluti 113 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,CA 92648 City of Huntington Beach fhb✓� �-0-1 File #: 22-510 MEETING DATE: 6/21/2022 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Sean Joyce, Interim City Manager VIA: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Ricky Ramos, Principal Planner Subject: Adopt Ordinance No. 4257 approving Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 (Olson Townhomes located at Talbert Avenue and Newland Street) Approved for introduction June 7, 2022 - Vote: 7-0 Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a request by Olson Company to amend the land use and zoning designations at the subject site from Residential Low Density to Residential Medium Density. The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the request. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Recommended Action: Adopt Ordinance No. 4257, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to Rezone the Real Property Located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM)(Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001)." Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motions: A. Deny Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001. B. Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 4 Printed on 6/16/2022 powereliq LegistarTM 114 File #: 22-510 MEETING DATE: 6/21/2022 A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Ben R. Johnson, The Olson Company, 3010 Old Ranch Pkwy, #100, Seal Beach, CA 90740 Property Owner: Mary Langston, 18627 Brookhurst Street, Unit#456, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 The project includes the following requests: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21-002 - To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 21-001 - To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 21-003 - To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The subject site is currently developed with 3 single-family residences and some accessory structures proposed to be demolished. The proposed GPA, ZMA, and MND are prerequisites to allow the applicant to subdivide and redevelop the approximately 2.07 acre site into a townhome project. The project also includes Tentative Tract map (TTM) No. 19157 to subdivide the site for condominium purposes and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 21-004 to develop 34 attached, 2- and 3- story townhomes up to 35 feet tall and allow up to an 8 foot tall retaining wall topped with a 6 foot tall wall along the west property line. The Planning Commission approved the TTM and CUP on May 10, 2022. No appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the TTM and CUP was filed within the 10-day appeal period that ended on May 20, 2022. The May 10, 2022 Planning Commission staff report provides a detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project (Attachment No. 4). B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION: On May 10, 2022 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed project. There were 11 speakers (5 in favor and 6 opposed). Those in favor cited the need for housing and that the project was attractive and would be an improvement. Those in opposition expressed concerns of additional traffic, site access, parking, density, and building height. After discussing the same topics the speakers brought up, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND and approve the TTM and CUP. Planning Commission Action on May 10, 2022: A motion was made by Scandura, seconded by Acosta-Galvan, to recommend to the City Council approval of GPA No. 21-002, ZMA No. 21-001, and MND No. 21-003 and to approve TTM No. 19157 and CUP No. 21-004 with findings and modified conditions carried by the following vote: AYES: Adam, Mandic, Acosta-Galvan, Perkins, Scandura, Rodriguez, Ray City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 4 Printed on 6/16/2022 powerel'6�Leglstarl" 115 File #: 22-510 MEETING DATE: 6/21/2022 NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: MOTION PASSED C. STAFF ANALYSIS: The staff report for the May 10, 2022 Planning Commission hearing (Attachment No. 4) provides a detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project including the GPA, ZMA, and MND requests before the City Council as well as the TTM and CUP that were approved by the Planning Commission. In summary, staff recommends approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND based on the following: - The MND is adequate, complete, and has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures. - The MND was prepared in compliance with the CEQA Guidelines. - The GPA and ZMA are consistent with the General Plan and its goals and policies. - The GPA and ZMA are compatible with the surrounding area. - The project adds to the City's housing stock, including affordable housing, and RHNA targets. Environmental Status: A MND was prepared for the project (Attachment No. 11) and concludes that no significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, and tribal cultural resources. The MND was available for a 20-day public review period from March 31 to April 20, 2022. A response to the 12 comment letters received (Attachment No. 9) is attached for City Council review prior to action on the project Strategic Plan Goal: Economic Development & Housing Attachment(s): 1. Suggested Findings for Approval of MND No. 21-003 and ZMA No. 21-001 2. Resolution No. 2022-23 for GPA No. 21-002 3. Ordinance No. 4257 for ZMA No. 21-001 4. May 10, 2022 Planning Commission Staff Report 5. Vicinity Map 6. Project Narrative received and dated April 27, 2022 7. Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps 8. Letters in Opposition/Support 9. Response To Comments Draft MND No. 21-003 10. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11. Draft MND No. 21-003 available at: <https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/government/departments/planning/major/major-projects-view.cfm?ID=1111> 12. Tentative Tract Map No. 19157 and Site Plan (For Reference Only) 13. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 4 Printed on 6/16/2022 powered'Leglstar-, 116 File #: 22-510 MEETING DATE: 6/21/2022 City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 4 Printed on 6/16/2022 powere7fWy Legistar" ORDINANCE NO. 4257 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO REZONE THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8371 TO 8461 TALBERT AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 21-001) WHEREAS,pursuant to California State Planning and Zoning Law,the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001, which rezones the property located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue from Residential Low Density(RL)to Residential Medium Density (RM); and After due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan; NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION l: That the real property that is the subject of this ordinance is located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue and is more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2: That the zoning designation of the Subject Property is hereby changed from Residential Low Density (RL)to Residential Medium Density (RM) (Exhibit B). SECTION 3: That the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended to reflect Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 as described herein. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended zoning map. A copy of said amended map shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. 22-11203/280921 ORDINANCE NO. 4257 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the c?/Stday of ,(���J , 2022. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED A O FORM: City Clerk Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: klo U"L � - City Manager Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Legal Description and Map Exhibit B: Amended Zoning Map 2 dRD Ard. 5/.Z5.7- Exhibit A PROJECT BOUNDARY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8371 -8375 TALBERT AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 iw —� JALM DRIVE I co I 0 I J I � Ilz 20' N89'26'00"W 640' 20 L ILo co LD w PROJECT AREA: i W GROSS: 2.43 ACRES I 00 o NET: 2.07 ACRES I M N � 0 0 ) o 0 N � / O Z -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N89 19r 54 W 640' 0 TALBERT AVENUE BOUNDARY SCALE: 1" = 100' LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: (APN 167-531-24) PARCELS 2 AND 3, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 34 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 130.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL B: (APN 167-531-23) PARCEL 4, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 34 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 130.00 FEET THEREOF. v � V [PMO o 0 © 0 Stymie Dr. U) (0 R RM 7 -Aid r ?` 23 .. 1� 167-531 -23 yy ' I y lue rt -- _. - - -_- - - - ti A r Ord. No. 4257 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on June 7,2022, and was again read to said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on June 21,2022, and was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council. AYES: Bolton, Posey, Delgleize, Carr, Moser, Kalmick NOES: None ABSENT: Peterson ABSTAIN: None I,Robin Estanislau,CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in the Huntington Beach Wave on June 30,2022. L In accordance with the City Charter of said City. r Robin Estanislau,City Clerk City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California W 2000 Main Street, r� Huntington Beach,CA 92648 City of Huntington Beach ,�� ,,� y� _« /iUnzv pug 0 A[ 4-0 File #: 22-451 MEETING DATE: 6/7/2022 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Sean Joyce, Interim City Manager VIA: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Ricky Ramos, Principal Planner Subject: Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, Resolution No. 2022-23 approving General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, and Ordinance No. 4257 approving Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 (Olson Townhomes located at Talbert Avenue and Newland Street) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a request by Olson Company to amend the land use and zoning designations at the subject site from Residential Low Density to Residential Medium Density. The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the request. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Recommended Action: A) Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 with findings (Attachment No.1) and mitigation measures; and, B) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 2022- 23, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 21-002" (Attachment No. 2); and, C) Approve Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and approve for introduction Ordinance No. 4257, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance to Rezone the Real Property Located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) (Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001)." (Attachment No. 3) Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motions: City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 4 Printed on 6/1/2022 power/Legistar- File #: 22-451 MEETING DATE: 6/7/2022 A. Deny Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001. B. Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Ben R. Johnson, The Olson Company, 3010 Old Ranch Pkwy, #100, Seal Beach, CA 90740 Property Owner: Mary Langston, 18627 Brookhurst Street, Unit#456, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 The project includes the following requests: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21-002 - To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 21-001 - To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 21-003 - To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The subject site is currently developed with 3 single-family residences and some accessory structures proposed to be demolished. The proposed GPA, ZMA, and MND are prerequisites to allow the applicant to subdivide and redevelop the approximately 2.07 acre site into a townhome project. The project also includes Tentative Tract map (TTM) No. 19157 to subdivide the site for condominium purposes and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 21-004 to develop 34 attached, 2- and 3- story townhomes up to 35 feet tall and allow up to an 8 foot tall retaining wall topped with a 6 foot tall wall along the west property line. The Planning Commission approved the TTM and CUP on May 10, 2022. No appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the TTM and CUP was filed within the 10-day appeal period that ended on May 20, 2022. The May 10, 2022 Planning Commission staff report provides a detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project (Attachment No. 4). B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AND RECOMMENDATION: On May 10, 2022 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed project. There were 11 speakers (5 in favor and 6 opposed). Those in favor cited the need for housing and that the project was attractive and would be an improvement. Those in opposition expressed concerns of additional traffic, site access, parking, density, and building height. After discussing the same topics the speakers brought up, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND and approve the TTM and CUP. City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 4 Printed on 6/1/2022 power LegistarTI File #: 22-451 MEETING DATE: 6/7/2022 Planninq Commission Action on May 10, 2022: A motion was made by Scandura, seconded by Acosta-Galvan, to recommend to the City Council approval of GPA No. 21-002, ZMA No. 21-001, and MND No. 21-003 and to approve TTM No. 19157 and CUP No. 21-004 with findings and modified conditions carried by the following vote: AYES: Adam, Mandic, Acosta-Galvan, Perkins, Scandura, Rodriguez, Ray NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: MOTION PASSED C. STAFF ANALYSIS: The staff report for the May 10, 2022 Planning Commission hearing (Attachment No. 4) provides a detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project including the GPA, ZMA, and MND requests before the City Council as well as the TTM and CUP that were approved by the Planning Commission. In summary, staff recommends approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND based on the following: - The MND is adequate, complete, and has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures. - The MND was prepared in compliance with the CEQA Guidelines. - The GPA and ZMA are consistent with the General Plan and its goals and policies. - The GPA and ZMA are compatible with the surrounding area. - The project adds to the City's housing stock, including affordable housing, and RHNA targets. Environmental Status: A MND was prepared for the project (Attachment No. 11) and concludes that no significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, and tribal cultural resources. The MND was available for a 20-day public review period from March 31 to April 20, 2022. A response to the 12 comment letters received (Attachment No. 9) is attached for City Council review prior to action on the project Strategic Plan Goal: Economic Development & Housing Attachment(s): 1. Suggested Findings for Approval of MND No. 21-003 and ZMA No. 21-001 2. Resolution No. 2022-23 for GPA No. 21-002 3. Ordinance No. 4257 for ZMA No. 21-001 4. May 10, 2022 Planning Commission Staff Report 5. Vicinity Map 6. Project Narrative received and dated April 27, 2022 7. Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 4 Printed on 6/1/2022 powerEA5IQ61 LegistarT" File #: 22-451 MEETING DATE: 6/7/2022 8. Letters in Opposition/Support 9. Response To Comments Draft MND No. 21-003 10. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11. Draft MND No. 21-003 available at: <https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/aovernment/departments/planning/major/major-projects-view.cfm?ID=1111> 12. Tentative Tract Map No. 19157 and Site Plan (For Reference Only) 13. PowerPoint Presentation City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 4 Printed on 6/1/2022 powerd$07y LegistarT" ATTACHMENT # 1 .1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 21-003 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 21-001 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL — MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 21-003: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of twenty (20) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the City Council prior to action on Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, and Zoning Map Amendment No. 21- 001. 2. Mitigation measures, incorporated into the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. No significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, and tribal cultural resources. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City Council that the project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment. Potential impacts from the project are reduced to less than significant through the project design and mitigation measures. SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 21-001: 1. Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 21-001 to change the zoning on an approximately 2.07 acre site from RL (Residential Low Density) to RM (Residential Medium Density) is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan as identified below: A. Land Use Element Goal LU-1 - New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-1A — Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Attachment. 1.1 Policy LU-1 C - Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-1 D - Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Policy LU-21D - Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policy LU-2E - Intensify the use and strengthen the role of public art, architecture, landscaping, site design, and development patterns to enhance the visual image of Huntington Beach. Goal LU-4 - A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Goal LU-7 - Neighborhoods, corridors, and community subareas are well designed, and buildings, enhanced streets, and public spaces contribute to a strong sense of place. The ZMA will implement the land use designation proposed with General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 and will be an extension of zoning found in the area. It will enable redevelopment of an infill site into a residential community consisting of 34 townhomes to address the diverse housing needs of the community. The proposed project will be compatible with the character of the neighborhood and will meet the changing needs of the community. The project will exhibit an architectural style that is in keeping with the proportion, scale, and character of the neighborhood and consistent with the development standards in the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The project also provides landscaped areas along the street frontages and throughout the site to enhance its appearance. B. Housing Element Policy 1.1 - Preserve the character, scale and quality of established residential neighborhoods. Goal 2 - Provide adequate housing sites through appropriate land use, zoning and specific plan designations to accommodate Huntington Beach's share of regional housing needs. Policy 2.1. - Provide site opportunities for development of housing that responds to diverse community needs in terms of housing types, cost and location, emphasizing locations near services and transit that promote walkability. Goal 3 - Enhance housing affordability so that modest income households can remain an integral part of the Huntington Beach community. Attachment. 1.2 Policy 3.1 - Encourage the production of housing that meets all economic segments of the community, including lower, moderate, and upper income households, to maintain a balanced community. Policy 3.2 - Utilize the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as a tool to integrate affordable units within market rate developments. Continue to prioritize the construction of affordable units on-site, with provision of units off-site or payment of an in-lieu housing fee as a less preferred alternative. Policy 3.3 - Facilitate the development of affordable housing through regulatory incentives and concessions, and/or financial assistance, with funding priority to projects that include extremely low income units. Proactively seek out new models and approaches in the provision of affordable housing. Policy 3.4 - Explore collaborative partnerships with non-profit organizations, developers, the business community and governmental agencies in the provision of affordable housing. Policy 4.1 - Regulatory Incentives for Affordable Housing Support the use of density bonuses and other incentives, such as fee deferrals/waivers and parking reductions, to offset or reduce the costs of developing affordable housing while ensuring that potential impacts are addressed. The proposed project will develop an underutilized site with 34 two- and three-story townhomes that will be consistent with the scale and nature of residential land uses surrounding the site while also addressing the diverse housing needs of the community. The project will comply with the City's affordable housing requirement to provide 10 percent of the proposed base dwelling units as affordable units. Due to the provision of affordable housing, the applicant is entitled to a 5 percent density bonus, one incentive/concession, and an unlimited number of waivers of development standards as permitted by the California Density Bonus Law. The project includes a 5 percent density bonus to allow 2 density bonus dwelling units in addition to the 32 base density units. 2. The ZMA would only change the land use designation of the subject property rather than a general land use provision and would not affect the uses authorized in and the standards prescribed for the proposed zoning district. 3. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed because it will allow an underdeveloped site to be developed with a residential use that is consistent with the character of the area and will add to the City's housing stock. 4. Adoption of the ZMA will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because the proposed zoning will implement the land use designation proposed with General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 and is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Attachment. 1.3 ATTACHMENT #2 J RESOLUTION NO. 2022-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 21-002 WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 proposes to amend Figure LU-2 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan to change the land use designation of the real property consisting of an approximately 2.07 net acre site located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue, as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B attached hereto, from Residential Low Density (RL)to Residential Medium Density (RM). Pursuant to California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 and recommended approval of said entitlement to the City Council; and Pursuant to California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,after notice duly given,held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 21- 002; and The City Council finds that said General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community,is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the real property that is the subject of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") is located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue and is more particularly described in the legal description and maps attached hereto as Exhibits A and B and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 2: That General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 is hereby approved. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended Land Use Map. A copy of said map, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Community Development Department. 22-11203/280920 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-23 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of filj Lp j , 2022. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED 44404, City Clerk City ttorneyt1 REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ITIATED AND APPROVED: II ^^ V1� City Manager Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Legal Description and Map Exhibit B: Amended General Plan Map (Extract of Figure LU-2) 2 �2�oa/a..2a2Z-.Z3 Exhibit A PROJECT BOUNDARY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8371 -8375 TA!BERT AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 w JALM DRIVE I cf) I 0 I J I � Ilz 20' N89'26'00"W 640' 2 al L ILD co w PROJECT AREA: I w GROSS: 2.43 ACRES I c I NET: 2.07 ACRES N � ) o O N � / O Z - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -iL 7:1 N89 19 54 W 640' 0 TALBERT AVENUE BOUNDARY SCALE: 1" = 100' LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: (APN 167-531-24) PARCELS 2 AND 3, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 34 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 130.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL B: (APN 167-531-23) PARCEL 4, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 34 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 130.00 FEET THEREOF. D o 0 o D MOO 0 v v Ak Stymie Dr. - J f cuw r. •■�ti ■ � ■ LLD s w 1 _ r � I Res. No. 2022-23 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on June 7, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: Peterson, Bolton, Posey, Delgleize, Carr, Moser, Kalmick NOES: None ABSENT: None RECUSE: None City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #3 124 ORDINANCE NO. 4257 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO REZONE THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8371 TO 8461 TALBERT AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY (RL) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 21-001) WHEREAS,pursuant to California State Planning and Zoning Law,the Huntington Beach Planning Commission and Huntington Beach City Council have held separate, duly noticed public hearings to consider Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001, which rezones the property located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM); and After due consideration of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission and all other evidence presented, the City Council finds that the aforesaid amendment is proper and consistent with the General Plan; NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the real property that is the subject of this ordinance is located at 8371 to 8461 Talbert Avenue and is more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2: That the zoning designation of the Subject Property is hereby changed from Residential Low Density (RL)to Residential Medium Density(RM) (Exhibit B). SECTION 3: That the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended to reflect Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 as described herein. The Director of Community Development is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended zoning map. A copy of said amended map shall be available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its adoption. 22-11203/280921 124 125 ORDINANCE NO. 4257 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 52022. Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney by REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: City Manager Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Legal Description and Map Exhibit B: Amended Zoning Map 2 125 126 Exhibit A PROJECT BOUNDARY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8371 -8375 TALBERT AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 w -� JALM DRIVE Q I J I � z 20' N89°26'00"W 640' 2 '_ CD I Q0 PROJECT AREA: W W r GROSS: 2.43 ACRES I ro o "' N NET: 2.07 ACRES CD � o / O O N Z - - - - - J ZD N89 19 54 W 640' 0 I TALBERT AVENUE BOUNDARY SCALE: 1" = 100' LEGAL DESCRIPTION REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: (APN 167-531-24) PARCELS 2 AND 3, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 34 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 130.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL B: (APN 167-531-23) PARCEL 4, IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 42, PAGE 34 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 130.00 FEET THEREOF. 126 al$ ro ose o n � n - i " a Q a 167-531 -23 167 —531 -23 y " � 3 4 u- AM _. _. L R L f F t I n 1 ATTAC H M E N T #4 ri 2000 Main Street, � Huntington Beach, CA 92648 City of Huntington Beach / L F File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ursula Luna-Reynosa, Community Development Director BY: Ricky Ramos, Principal Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 21-002/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (ZMA) NO. 21-001/TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) NO. 19157/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 21-004/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) NO. 21- 003 (OLSON TOWNHOMES) REQUEST: GPA: To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). ZMA: To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). TTM: To subdivide approximately 2.07 acres for condominium purposes. CUP: To: 1) develop 34 attached, two- and three-story townhomes up to 35 feet tall and 2) allow up to an 8 foot tall retaining wall topped with a 6 foot tall wall along the west property line. MND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. LOCATION: 8371-8461 Talbert Avenue, 92647 (northwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street) APPLICANT: Ben R. Johnson, The Olson Company, 3010 Old Ranch Pkwy, #100, Seal Beach, CA 90740 PROPERTY OWNER: Mary Langston, 18627 Brookhurst Street, Unit# 456, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 BUSINESS OWNER: Not applicable STATEMENT OF ISSUE: City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power(EQ*Legistar- File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 1. Are the GPA and ZMA necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community and consistent with other elements of the General Plan? 2. Are the proposed GPA and ZMA designations compatible with the surrounding area? 3. Does the project satisfy all the findings required for approval of a ZMA, TTM, CUP, and MND? 4. Is the MND adequate and complete in that it has identified all significant environmental effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures? 5. Was the MND prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines? RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission take the following actions: A) Recommend approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and mitigation measures; B) Recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 and forward the draft City Council Resolution (Attachment No. 2) to the City Council for consideration; C) Recommend approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 with findings (Attachment No. 1) and forward the draft City Council Ordinance (Attachment No. 3) to the City Council for consideration; and D) Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19157 and Conditional Use Permit No. 21-004 with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No.1). ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A) Deny Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001, Tentative Tract Map No. 19157, and Conditional Use Permit No. 21-004 with findings for denial. B) Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003, General Plan Amendment No. 21-002, Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001, Tentative Tract Map No. 19157, and Conditional Use Permit No. 21-004 and direct staff accordingly. PROJECT PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to subdivide and redevelop the approximately 2.07 net acre site with 34 attached townhomes (Attachment No. 5). The project includes the following requests: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21-002 - To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 21-001 - To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power Legistar- File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 19157 - To subdivide approximately 2.07 acres for condominium purposes. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 21-004 - To: 1) develop 34 attached, 2- and 3-story townhomes up to 35 feet tall and 2) allow up to an 8 foot tall retaining wall topped with a 6 foot tall wall along the west property line. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 21-003 - To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The site is currently developed with 3 single family residences and some accessory structures which are proposed to be demolished. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Subject Propertv And Surrounding General Plan Desi nations Zoning And Land Uses: LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING LAND USE Subject Property: Residential Low Density Residential Low Density Single Family (RL) (RL) Residential North of Subject RL RL Single Family Property: Residential East of Subject Low Medium Density Garden Homes (City of Single Family Property (across Residential (City of Fountain Valley) Residential Newland St.): Fountain Valley) South of Subject RL RL Single Family Property (across Residential Talbert Ave.): West of Subject Public-Semipublic Qualified (Residential Church Property: (underlying OpenAgriculture) (Q(RA)) Space-Park) (PS (OS- P)) General Plan Conformance: The applicant proposes to amend the subject site's General Plan land use designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM). The RM designation allows detached and attached residential like detached single-family residential, townhomes, and apartments at a maximum of 15 dwelling units per acre. The RM designation is found north of Jalm Drive and is compatible with and often located next to areas designated RL. The project is consistent with the residential character of the area and with the following goals and policies in the General Plan: A. Land Use Element Goal LU-1 - New commercial, industrial, and residential development is coordinated to ensure City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 powerd'V Legistar- File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 that the land use pattern is consistent with the overall goals and needs of the community. Policy LU-1A - Ensure that development is consistent with the land use designations presented in the Land Use Map, including density, intensity, and use standards applicable to each land use designation. Policy LU-1 C - Support infill development, consolidation of parcels, and adaptive reuse of existing buildings. Policy LU-1 D - Ensure that new development projects are of compatible proportion, scale and character to complement adjoining uses. Policy LU-2D - Maintain and protect residential neighborhoods by avoiding encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policy LU-2E - Intensify the use and strengthen the role of public art, architecture, landscaping, site design, and development patterns to enhance the visual image of Huntington Beach. Goal LU-4 - A range of housing types is available to meet the diverse economic, physical, and social needs of future and existing residents, while neighborhood character and residences are well maintained and protected. Goal LU-7 - Neighborhoods, corridors, and community subareas are well designed, and buildings, enhanced streets, and public spaces contribute to a strong sense of place. The ZMA will implement the land use designation proposed with General Plan Amendment No. 21 -002 and will be an extension of zoning found in the area. It will enable redevelopment of an infill site into a residential community consisting of 34 townhomes to address the diverse housing needs of the community. The proposed project will be compatible with the character of the neighborhood and will meet the changing needs of the community. The project will exhibit an architectural style that is in keeping with the proportion, scale, and character of the neighborhood. It is consistent with the development standards in the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) except for any concession and waivers permitted under the State Density Bonus Law. The project also provides landscaped areas along the street frontages and throughout the site to enhance its appearance. B. Housinq Element Policy 1.1 - Preserve the character, scale and quality of established residential neighborhoods. Goal 2 - Provide adequate housing sites through appropriate land use, zoning and specific plan designations to accommodate Huntington Beach's share of regional housing needs. Policy 2.1. - Provide site opportunities for development of housing that responds to diverse community needs in terms of housing types, cost and location, emphasizing locations near services and transit that promote walkability. Goal 3 - Enhance housing affordability so that modest income households can remain an City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power Legistar- File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 integral part of the Huntington Beach community. Policy 3.1 - Encourage the production of housing that meets all economic segments of the community, including lower, moderate, and upper income households, to maintain a balanced community. Pol icy_3.2 - Utilize the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as a tool to integrate affordable units within market rate developments. Continue to prioritize the construction of affordable units on-site, with provision of units off-site or payment of an in-lieu housing fee as a less preferred alternative. Policy 3.3 - Facilitate the development of affordable housing through regulatory incentives and concessions, and/or financial assistance, with funding priority to projects that include extremely low income units. Proactively seek out new models and approaches in the provision of affordable housing. Policy 3.4 - Explore collaborative partnerships with non-profit organizations, developers, the business community and governmental agencies in the provision of affordable housing. Policy 4.1 - Regulatory Incentives for Affordable Housing Support the use of density bonuses and other incentives, such as fee deferrals/waivers and parking reductions, to offset or reduce the costs of developing affordable housing while ensuring that potential impacts are addressed. The proposed project will develop an underutilized site with 34 two- and three-story townhomes that will be consistent with the scale and nature of residential land uses surrounding the site while also addressing the diverse housing needs of the community. The project will comply with the City's affordable housing requirement to provide 10 percent of the proposed base dwelling units as affordable units. Due to the provision of affordable housing, the applicant is entitled to a 5 percent density bonus, one incentive/concession, and an unlimited number of waivers of development standards as permitted by the State Density Bonus Law. The project includes a 5 percent density bonus to allow 2 density bonus dwelling units in addition to the 32 base density units. The density bonus, concession, and waivers would facilitate development of the project, which adds to the City's overall housing stock. Zonin_g Compliance: Zoning Map Amendment The proposed zoning designation for the subject site of RM is in conformance with the proposed General Plan designation and is an extension of the zoning found in the area north of Jalm Drive. Development standards require a minimum parcel size of 6,000 square feet, lot width of 60 feet, maximum building height of 35 feet, and lot coverage of 50 percent among others. Additional development standards are identified in Chapter 210 (Residential Districts) of the HBZSO. The adoption of the ZMA will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice because the proposed zoning will implement the proposed General Plan land use designation and is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. A community need is demonstrated for the change proposed because it will allow the site to be redeveloped into a City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power Legistar" File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 townhome project that is consistent with the character of the area and will add to the housing stock, including deed restricted affordable units. All of the proposed dwelling units would be counted toward the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Tract Map/Site Layout/Compatibility Gated access to the site will be provided off Newland Street and Talbert Avenue to a 20-foot wide 2- way private drive aisle running along the north and west sides of the site. The main drive aisle connects to other drive aisles that provide direct access to each unit and its attached garage. The main drive aisle, 5 feet of perimeter landscaping, and a 6-foot tall wall provide buffering to the adjacent residential development to the north. Talbert Avenue and Newland Street separate the site from the other surrounding residential development. Open parking spaces are located on the south side of the main drive aisle. The project includes vehicular stacking at the gated access of over 40 feet at the Newland driveway and 20 feet at the Talbert driveway in compliance with code. Pedestrian access to the site will be through existing sidewalks along Newland and Talbert and interior sidewalks throughout the project. The project includes 9 buildings in a north-south orientation with each building containing 3 to 4 units. The northernmost units of all buildings are designed as 2 story for greater compatibility with the adjoining homes while the remainder of the units are proposed at 3 story and 35 feet tall in compliance with the zoning code. Must of the units are oriented towards courtyards while a larger central open space provides amenities like a shade structure, seating, tables, and a grilling island. Building 1 contains 4 units that orient towards Newland Street. Both the Talbert and Newland frontages include 15 feet of landscaping except where waivers are requested. The TTM is consistent with the proposed General Plan and zoning designation. It complies with required minimum lot size and width. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed because it is located in a residential neighborhood with similar development including some also under the RM designation. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems or substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because the site has been previously been disturbed and is void of any wildlife habitat. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision unless alternative easements, for access or for use, will be provided. The subdivision will provide all necessary streets, sidewalk, and utility easements to serve the new development. Conditional Use Permit The proposed 34 townhomes will improve an existing underutilized site with a residential development consistent with other uses in the vicinity. The applicant has submitted 4 floor plans with most units at 3 stories and 35 feet tall in compliance with the HBZSO. The northernmost unit in each building has 2 stories at 27 feet tall. The units range from 1,258 to 1,846 square feet with to 3 to 4 bedrooms and a 2-car attached garage. The project will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. It will be consistent with the overall bulk and scale of existing residential uses in the project vicinity. The City of Huntington Beach Page 6 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 powers LeaistarT" File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 project includes facade breaks, roof variations, and architectural treatment to minimize overall building mass and scale. The dwellings will be separated from the nearest residential development to the north by a 6 foot tall wall, 5 feet of landscaping, and a 20 foot wide drive aisle. Two-story units are proposed along the north side to enhance compatibility with existing development before transitioning to 3-story towards Talbert Avenue. The proposed 8-foot tall retaining wall with 6-foot tall above ground wall along the western property line is needed to enable the entire site to be developed. Its location along the western interior property line will reduce its visibility and existing and proposed landscaping will help soften its appearance. The proposed grading plan minimizes pad elevations and the retaining wall as much as possible while still allowing the site to function and drain properly. The granting of the conditional use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan because the project will be consistent with the RM Land Use Element designation established in the area. The proposed project will comply with the provisions of the RM zoning district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the HBZSO with the exception of any concession/incentive and waivers of development standards permitted under the State Density Bonus Law. California Density Bonus Law The applicant is seeking to invoke development tools and privileges outlined in the California Density Bonus Law (CDBL) (found in California Government Code Sections 65915-65918). As stipulated in the CDBL, projects providing 10 percent of the total base units as available to moderate income households are entitled to a 5 percent density bonus. In addition to a density bonus, local jurisdictions are required to grant other incentives or concessions to housing projects containing a percentage of affordable units. A concession or incentive is defined as any of the following: a reduction in site development standards or a modification of zoning code or architectural design requirements (e.g., a reduction in setback or minimum square footage requirements) approval of mixed use zoning, other regulatory incentives or concessions which result in identifiable and actual cost reductions. The number of required incentives or concessions that are granted to an applicant is based on the percentage of affordable units included as part the project. Projects that include 10 percent of the proposed units as affordable to moderate income households (e.g., the proposed project) are entitled to one incentive/concession. Concessions/incentives are permitted unless the proposed incentives/concessions do not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions, would cause a public health or safety problem, would cause an environmental problem, would harm historical property, or would be contrary to the law. In addition to granting incentives/concessions, developments qualifying for a density bonus also can receive an unlimited number of waivers from development standards. As such, the City is not permitted to apply development standards that would physically prevent the project from being developed at the permitted density with the granted incentives/concessions. However, the City is not required to waive or reduce development standards that would cause a public health or safety problem, cause an environmental problem, harm historical property, or would be contrary to law. A waiver or reduction of a development standard does not count as an incentive or concession, and there is no limit on the number of development standard waivers that may be requested or granted. In addition, the CDBL stipulates that the City may not require parking at ratios beyond what is City of Huntington Beach Page 7 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power Legistar TM File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 established in the CDBL upon the developer's request. Consistent with the CDBL, the project includes the following density bonus, incentive/concession, waivers of City standards, and reduction of parking requirements: Density Bonus: The project qualifies for a 5 percent density bonus per the CDBL due to the provision of 10 percent of the total base units as affordable to moderate income households. As such, the applicant is entitled to and is requesting a 5 percent density bonus to allow 2 additional units in addition to the 32 base units permitted. It should be noted that the maximum number of base units permitted in the General Plan and HBZSO is based on the net lot area after any dedication for public right of way. Based on the project site's net lot area of 89,949 square feet and the RM density factor of 1 unit per 2,904 square feet of lot area, the project would yield 30.97 units which under the CDBL rounds up to 31 units. However, the CDBL Section 65915(f) refers to ". . . allowable gross residential density." Furthermore, Section 65915(r) states that the CDBL ". . . shall be interpreted in favor of producing the maximum number of total housing units." To this end, approximately 2,979 square feet of the gross lot size is being added to the net lot of 89,949 square feet in order to yield 32 base units. Incentives: The applicant is not requesting any incentives. Waivers: The following waivers of development standards are proposed so as not to physically preclude the applicant from developing the proposed number of units on the site: 1.) Common and private open space dimensions: The applicant is proposing a waiver of the common and private open space minimum dimensions to allow the open space dimensions proposed. The project requires total private and common open space equal to 25 percent of the residential floor area per unit, which results in a total open space requirement of 14,505 square feet for the project. Common open space must have a minimum dimension of 10 feet. Private open space must have a minimum dimension of 10 feet for courts and 6 feet for balconies. The proposed open space plan Sheet L-6 shows that the project proposes 7,261 square feet of common and private open space that meet the minimum dimension requirements. An additional 10,518 square feet of open space that does not meet the minimum dimensions is also proposed. While the project meets the overall amount of open space required by the HBZSO (based on square footage only), more than half of it cannot be counted toward meeting the code requirement because it does not meet the minimum dimensions. 2.) Aboveground transformer and vault within 15 foot Talbert Avenue setback: The applicant is proposing a large vault and a transformer within the 15 foot Talbert Avenue setback as a result of the City's utilities undergrounding requirement. The HBZSO does not allow aboveground utility improvements like transformers in the required front or street side yard. 3.) Reduced Talbert/Newland corner unit building setback: The applicant is proposing a City of Huntington Beach Page 8 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power LegistarTrO File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 reduced setback of 7 feet-11 inches lieu of 15 feet for the dwelling unit located at the corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street. The portion of the dwelling unit within the 15 foot setback includes the covered patio and covered deck above it. Reduced Parking Ratio: Per the CDBL, the City may not require more than the parking ratios for a density bonus project (inclusive of parking for persons with disabilities) outlined in the table below. As illustrated by this table, the proposed project would provide 20 more spaces than what is required by State law. Unit Type Type Required Required Maximum Required Provided Count Ratio per City Parking Parking Parking Parking by Code Spaces Requirements Spaces per the Project per City per State Law State Law Code 3 Bedroom 20 Units 2.5 Spaces (1 50 1.5 per Unit 30 40 enclosed) per Unit Bedroom 14 Units 2.5 Spaces (1 35 2.5 per Unit 35 28 enclosed) per Unit 0.5 Guest Space 17 0 spaces 0 17 per Unit Total 102 - 65 85 Quimby Act and Affordable Housing The Community Services and Library Department has determined that additional public park area within the project area is not needed. Therefore, the project will pay park and recreation in lieu fees to satisfy Quimby Act requirements pursuant to Chapter 254 of the HBZSO. Pursuant to the HBZSO, the project is required to comply with affordable housing requirements and provide 10 percent of the proposed 32 base dwelling units (3.2 units) as affordable units. The restricted income units must be provided on-site with the new development in order to qualify for density bonus. In accordance with these requirements, the applicant is proposing one low income unit and two moderate income units on-site and will pay an in lieu fee for the remaining 0.2 unit. Undergrounding of Utilities The applicant is required to underground utilities as part of the approval of the proposed TTM pursuant to Chapter 255 of the HBZSO. The applicant intends to underground all existing and proposed utilities on site and along the project's Talbert Avenue frontage. However, the applicant is requesting to pay an in lieu fee for the undergrounding of utilities from the project's Newland Street frontage to the City limit line (20 feet east of the existing street centerline). The Planning Commission may allow the payment of an in lieu fee to be determined by the City Engineer based on reasonable estimated costs upon finding: 1.) The subdivision is within an area where existing utilities have not been placed underground; and 2.) Physical constraints make undergrounding of existing and proposed utilities impractical; and 3.) Overhead utilities will have no significant visual impact. City of Huntington Beach Page 9 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 powere52,7y Legistar'"s File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 The area around the project site has existing utilities that have not be placed underground. According to the applicant, in order to underground the 4 high voltage wires crossing Newland Street along Talbert Avenue, new utility support poles would need to be installed at the northeast corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street to provide structural support for the remaining City of Fountain Valley utility lines along Talbert Avenue. Further, 2 stabilizing span wires, crossing Newland Street, would need to remain for structural support. There would also be 1 new guy wire along Talbert Avenue to support the existing utility pole that would need to remain at the northwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street. Considering that any undergrounding of the Newland Street utilities would in fact result in a net decrease of only 3 wires (due to the addition of a new support guy wire and no change to the 2 necessary support wires), the undergrounding could be seen as providing minimal aesthetic improvement. Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: The project is in substantial conformance with the Urban Design Guidelines, Chapter 3 (Multi-Family Detached Residential) by providing: • New residential buildings in an arrangement that is sensitive to the characteristics of the existing site and surrounding area; • Ornamental landscaping and enhanced paving at the project entrance; • Orienting the buildings to promote privacy to the greatest extent possible; • Courtyards and open space areas throughout the project site; • Minimize number of access points and locate as far as possible from intersections; • Sidewalks along the perimeter and within the interior of the site; • Landscaping throughout the development that frames, softens, and enhances the quality of the development; • Architecture that is compatible with the surrounding buildings and meets or exceeds the standards of quality, which have been set by surrounding development; • Architectural elements such as windows, doors, etc. that create a rhythmic composition; • Varied building design, massing, and composition; • Elevations that are architecturally enhanced; • Roof designs that complement qualities of the neighboring residential structures such as type, slope, size, materials, and colors; and • Open space in close proximity to every dwelling. Environmental Status: A MND was prepared for the project (Attachment No. 13) and concludes that no significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, and tribal cultural resources. The MND was available for a 20-day public review period from March 31 to April 20, 2022. A response to the 12 comment letters received is attached for Planning Commission review prior to action on the project. Coastal Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. City of Huntington Beach Page 10 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power LegistarTl File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: Public Works, Building, Fire, Police, and Community Services staff reviewed the proposed project and identified code requirements applicable to the project. The Public Works Department identified some conditions that have been incorporated into the suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1) Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach Wave on Thursday, April 28, 2022 and notices were sent to property owners of record within a 500 ft. radius of the subject property, individuals/organizations requesting notification (Community Development Department's Notification Matrix), and applicant. Written communications received as of May 3, 2022 are attached to this staff report (Attachment No. 9). Application Processin_g Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): April 22, 2022 MND -Within 180 days of complete application GPA/ZMA/TTM/CUP - None SUMMARY: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of MND No. 21-003, GPA No. 21- 002, and ZMA No. 21-001 with findings (Attachment No. 1) to the City Council and approve TTM No. 19157 and CUP 21-004 with findings and conditions (Attachment No. 1). This recommendation is based on the following: - The MND is adequate, complete, and has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures. - The MND was prepared in compliance with the CEQA Guidelines. - The GPA, ZMA, TTM, and CUP are consistent with the General Plan and its goals and policies. - The GPA, ZMA, TTM, and CUP are compatible with the surrounding area. - The project meets the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. - The proposed project complies with the provisions of the HBZSO with the exception of any waivers of development standards proposed. - The proposed project adds to the City's housing stock, including affordable housing, and RHNA targets. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval of MND No. 21-003, ZMA No. 21-001, TTM No. 19157, CUP No. 21-004 2. Draft City Council Resolution for GPA No. 21-002 3. Draft City Council Ordinance for ZMA No. 21-001 4. Vicinity Map 5. Project Narrative received and dated April 27, 2022 6. Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps 7. Project Entitlement Plans dated March 2 - April 18, 2022 8. Code Requirements Letter (for informational purposes only) dated May 4, 2022 9. Letters in Opposition/Support City of Huntington Beach Page 11 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power LegistarTV File #: 22-395 MEETING DATE: 5/10/2022 10. Police Department memo dated June 29, 2021 11. Response To Comments Draft MND No. 21-003 12. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 13. Draft MND No. 21-003 available at <https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/government/departments/planning/major/major-projects- City of Huntington Beach Page 12 of 12 Printed on 5/5/2022 power Legistar- ATTACHMENT #5 N ONEfo., ■■■■■■■N ■IMMENSE■M ,,. ■■ ■■■ ■■N ,i 1■■■■■ s �y..m;7_•. 61 Jahn Dr `.Irilm t�, Jaim Dtap2 Flattery Jahn Dr. c M� At,., A-Tull is ' ATTAC H M E N T #6 Project Narrative Proposed Residential Development at 8375 Talbert Avenue Existing Land Use and Condition This roughly two acre, rectangular site is currently improved with three single-family detached residences in a large-lot fashion with supporting structures, such as detached garages and a metal work shed associated with the 8371 Talbert Avenue residence. These improvements consist of a substantially less intense land use than the abutting parcels and the general neighborhood. The site's western edge slopes to a non-functioning drainage culvert with a row of trees running with this north/south culvert. Past land use at the project site has primarily been agricultural, along with low density residential. The site was discovered to have no major environmental concerns. Abutting and Adjacent Land Uses and Context The site abutting to the west is a cemetery(part of(Saint Vincent De Paul Catholic Church) the size of several major city blocks. The abutting site to the west is improved on its far eastern third with a church (Saint Vincent De Paul Catholic Church) and support offices with asphalt surface parking lots surrounding those structures. To the site's immediate north are about ten single-story detached residences. To the opposite of those residences, along Jahn Drive, is a multi-family development of one and two story homes. To the site's immediate east is a 4-lane divided arterial, Newland Street. On Newland's opposite bound is a two-story single family development (constructed by The Olson Company in about 2005). (Newland is the City limit divider and this past Olson development is within the Fountain Valley city limits.) To its south is another 4-lane divided arterial, Talbert Avenue. Along the south side of Talbert are single-family detached residences. At the southeast corner of Talbert and Newland is a two-story multi-family development. Aside from the cemetery, the neighborhood is almost exclusively residential, shifting to commercial and retail uses only as one approaches its nearest north/south commercial corridor to its west, Beach Boulevard. The neighborhood is also effectively built-out. Most housing appears to be constructed roughly in the 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s. There is no noticeable architectural style or unified character for the area though almost all development appears to be of good quality. Project Description The Project proposes to redevelop this infill site with 34 attached townhome units, ranging from two to three stories. All units will feature attached, two car, side-by-side garages. All units will be for-sale, three of which are designated as moderate-income affordable. Units range from 1,258 square feet to 1,846 square feet. Bedrooms range from three to four, and bathrooms from 632 two and a half to three. All units will be sold and owned legally as condominiums. The community will be governed by Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), administered and overseen by a Homeowners Association (HOA). As a matter of practice, the applicant remains highly-involved with the HOA for typically ten years to ensure the HOA is operating effectively before largely shifting responsibility to residents. Application Intent The intent of the City application is to provide all information to allow for a thorough and responsible public review process that ultimately allows the applicant to secure all necessary entitlements to develop the project as proposed. Olson understands those entitlements to be a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment(to change both from Residential Low Density to Residential Medium Density) , Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Tentative Tract Map, (3) waivers and (1) concession afforded by the Density Bonus Law(referenced in the General Application), and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance via a MND. The Applicant requests that the CUP also consider the necessity of a retaining wall up to 8' tall along the western property line. The grade of the existing church parking lot abutting the site on its western edge is significantly lower than the site's. Furthermore, the site will need to receive some fill for a more even surface for construction of the far western building and site improvements in that area. This condition will necessitate a greater than two feet retention wall. More specifically, the height of the retaining (finished stucco) wall will vary from about 4' (measured from the footing of the existing retaining wall along the abandoned drainage culvert) to about 8' tall at its highest point near the northwest corner of the site, away from Talbert Avenue. Running on top of the retaining wall will be a not-to-exceed 6' (also finished stucco) perimeter wall (as measured from the subject site's side). A wall section graphic on the civil's grading plan visually explains this. Project Concept The conceptual site plan proposes two points of ingress/egress. The first is off of Newland Street with a single spine road along the length of the northern property line providing access to the entire community while doubling as a buffer to the abutting residences to the north. That buffer will be strengthened by a row of trees, landscaping and potentially a higher wall along this sensitive northern boundary. The community is proposed to be gated at both ingress/egress points. On-site vehicle circulation is two way. A secondary entrance (ingress/egress) is proposed at the farthest west drive aisle at Talbert Avenue. Drive aisles extending from the spine road, perpendicular to Talbert Avenue, provide access to the individual units. Buildings correspondingly run perpendicular to Talbert. Two-story units are featured for the northern-most unit of all buildings across the site. This provides a two story buffer for the existing single family residences backing to the shared north property line. From there, all plan types increase to three stories, thereby placing the higher intensity uses nearer to Talbert Avenue where it is best suited. Three courtyards (or paseos) are interspersed throughout the community with a larger central green open space serving as the community's focal point for social life and recreation. A shade 633 structure with tables and seating and a fire place with ample sectional-style seating is planned for this more major, centralized paseo. Virtually all front elevations front onto these paseos, some with enclosed patio spaces, to create a sense both a sense of community and provide an attractive open space view from all units. Along the entire stretch of the Talbert frontage, a "dry creek" bio-swale is planned to collect and treat storm water. It will also double as an attractive semi- natural feature and a buffer to the heavily truck-trafficked Talbert corridor. Buildings face the bio-swale section with side elevations exposed to the street (i.e., no wall) to maintain openness to the neighborhood and avoid a walled-off appearance. Architectural Style The Project is designed in a Santa Barbara style with strong eave cornice details (at enhanced locations), gable-end faces and simple shed roofs with low profile Spanish roof tiles. The style exhibits faux gable-end vent recesses, sculpted stucco sill trim, decorative trim with ceramic tile inserts, and smooth stucco surrounds at featured front doors or windows. Other details that the style brings are stucco battered wing-walls, arched openings at porches, deck openings with corbel details and corbel adorned details at cantilevers. Metal railing with accented scrolls, bay windows, Stucco Spanish hood entry awnings and exposed truss tails at low porches further expresses the style. Landscape Architecture & Concept The landscape concept provides a comprehensive, layered landscape palette with thematic street trees that blends with the proposed architecture. Water efficient irrigation system, plants, vines and groundcovers will be installed within the HOA areas, incorporating water conservation measures and a low-water, drought tolerant landscape. SB1818 (State Density Bonus Law)-Related Concession and Waivers Sought As afforded by SB 1818 and in compliance with Section 230.26 of the Huntington Beach Zoning Code, the project would provide 10 percent of the total unit count as moderate-income affordable units. In exchange, a 5% density increase is sought. Due to the provision of 10 percent moderate income, SB 1818 allows one concession or incentive to reduce the cost of the housing project. Additionally, SB 1818 allows an unlimited number of waivers of any development standard that will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of the housing project at the density proposed. Olson requests the below waivers and a concession with a brief explanation for each: 1. Common and Private Open Space Dimensions: The applicant requests a_waiver of the common and private open space minimum dimension development standards to allow the open space dimensions proposed. As referenced in the table on Sheet L-6, roughly half of the proposed common and private open space meets minimum dimensions. However, total open space proposed is significantly greater(17,779 sf versus 14,423 sf) than the amount of open space that the Huntington Beach Zoning Code requires. Because of the significant play and articulation of the elevations, particularly those fronting onto the 634 paseos, meeting the Huntington Beach Zoning Code open space minimum dimensions would not allow the project as physically proposed. If the project provided open space at the required common and private open space dimensions, there would be a reduction in the density of the project which would not be permitted under State Density Bonus Law. Nevertheless, with the waiver of the common and private open space development standards, the end-result provides a thoughtful configuration of private patios fronting onto the paseo, contributing to the "outdoor room" effect whose orientation encourages socializing in a visually-stimulating and intimate environment. Adhering to strict minimum dimensional standards would preclude the total unit count envisioned and in turn, the affordable component proposed. When the waiver of the minimum open space dimensions is taken into account, the project would substantially exceed the City- required amount of open space for the units proposed. Further, the design of the open space provides ample usage and attractive open space for the residents, thereby meeting the City's goals. 2. Potential SCE-Required Transformers and Related in the Setback: The City does not allow dry utility improvements like transformers to be placed above-ground in the setback. Because of City undergrounding requirements, it is likely that SCE will require a large vault and a smaller transformer pad within the Talbert setback to accommodate the Rule 20 requirement. (The timing for specifics is reliant upon SCE processes and is likely to be unknown for some time.) Should the City maintain both the undergrounding requirement and the relevant setback requirement, these utility improvements could only occur on-site outside the setback area. Placing those utility appurtenances on-site would result in the reduction of dwelling units since a location within the project site outside the setback area would need to be found and there is no adequate space with the residential density and amenities proposed. As such, the project requests a waiver of the development standard so as to allow the above-ground transformer within the setback area. At the same time, Olson would work with the City and SCE to reduce the size and amount of appurtenances to a degree that could then allow on-site installation. Should this circumstance prove out later in the SCE process, such that the size and amount of appurtenances are reduced, this waiver could no longer be necessary. 3. Front Yard Setback Relief for Talbert &Newland Corner Unit: The corner unit at Building 1 features a second floor balcony and covered patio that extend into the 15' front yard setback, reducing the setback to roughly 7'11". This encroachment is more than the amount of encroachment that zoning code allows. If this balcony and covered patio were to be pared back, the building then simply becomes out of compliance with the upper-floor setback instead of the front yard setback. Aside from the aesthetic and open space benefit of a balcony, if the building were to shift inward to achieve both front yard and upper-floor setback, the corner unit would be effectively lost, precluding the project with the density proposed. As such, with respect to Building 1's Talbert and Newland corner unit, the project requests a waiver to allow a second floor balcony and covered patio extending into the front yard setback and again, thereby reducing that setback to roughly 7'11". 635 4. Relief from the City's Utilities Undergrounding ordinance at Newland & Talbert: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(d), the Applicant requests an incentive or concession for relief from Huntington Beach Municipal Code requirements that would require the undergrounding of above-ground utilities along Newland Street frontage or across the street in the City of Fountain Valley. While the Applicant would underground all existing and proposed utilities in conformance with Huntington Beach Municipal Code requirements on-site, and along the Talbert Avenue, relief from any Newland Street utility undergrounding would result in identifiable and actual cost reductions, consistent with Government Code Section 65915(k) that would provide for affordable housing costs. Undergrounding utilities along Newland Avenue and in Fountain Valley are very costly(i.e., the costs of undergrounding in this location are estimated to be at least $350,000). Undergrounding utility approvals would also result in schedule delays (18-24 months beyond the typical construction schedule) and this would jeopardize lower interest construction loans through the delays in receiving regulatory approvals from various agencies. Further, the intended aesthetic benefit is greatly compromised (all above-ground poles and appurtenances would remain above-ground for technical reasons and only a few wires could be undergrounded with the rest remaining). As a result of granting the requested incentive or concession, there would be no specific adverse impact on public health and safety or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact. 636 AT TACHMENT #7 xis in ene.ra an �x s CL i R L 167-531 -23 167-531 -23 Jim RL 4 * 637 _ r Mt ro • W. r = Alk Nimbi i , y RL RM w a 167-531 -23 167-531 -w2,3 1 �i rRL1 RL 1 638 �t - x � s � • � oni • - ar � =v M JJ / (,Q ) RA { !i 167-531 -23 r z. 167-531 -23 _ 4 G 639 r • • • � � � �on � n • 0 ose r � Vn (Q ) RA RM b � x E 2 �ry 1� 167-531 -23 167-531 -23 -1Ma �- w P"q RL ATTACHMENT #8 From: Debra Topham To: Ramos, Ricky Cc: "Anabel Estrada"; 2dianeri Igye ggmail.com Subject: RE: REQUEST FOR MEETING POSTPONEMENT:Comments to draft-mitigation-negative-declaration of Proposed Olson Residential Townhomes Project Date: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 12:05:12 PM Importance: High Thank you,Mr.Ramos. May I clarify that the Tamarack Village HOA is once every other month commencing with the ODD months. Therefore,May 10,2022 is the next meeting of homeowners and board of director. Please communicate to the City Planning Commission our desire to participate in due public processes. Debra Topham 17893 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92647 E: debra@topham.com C: 714.642.5100 -----Original Message----- From: Ramos,Ricky<rramos@surfcity-hb.org> Sent:Tuesday,May 3,2022 8:48 AM To:Debra Topham<debra@topham.com> Cc: 'Anabel Estrada'<anabel@tritzpm.com>;2dianeripley@gmail.com Subject:RE:REQUEST FOR MEETING POSTPONEMENT:Comments to draft-mitigation-negative-declaration of Proposed Olson Residential Townhomes Project Hi Debra-I will attach your email below to the Planning Commission staff report for their consideration. It will be up to them. -----Original Message----- From:Debra Topham<debra@topham.com> Sent:Monday,May 2,2022 4:09 PM To:Ramos,Ricky<rramos@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:'Anabel Estrada'<anabel@tritzpm.com>;2dianeripley@gmail.com Subject:REQUEST FOR MEETING POSTPONEMENT: Comments to draft-mitigation-negative-declaration of Proposed Olson Residential Townhomes Project Importance:High Dear Mr.Ramos, Cc:Tamarack Village HOA Board of Directors contact(via Anabel Estrada Tritz Project Management)Adding Diane Ripley to this email request,too. This email is a formal request for a 30-day postponement of the Public Hearing before the Planning Commission regarding the Olson Residential Townhomes Project at the corner of Talbert and Newland. I received my notice in the mail on Saturday,April 30,2022 for the upcoming meeting originally scheduled for 6pm May 10,2022 in City Council Chambers.The post-mark on the envelope was April 27,2022. Our community of 101 residential units has not been provided sufficient time to consider 641 all aspects of the planning documents posted nor have we heard back from the public relations contact,Diane Ripley,who just visited us April 29-30, 2022 with news about project changes. Furthermore,the 6pm May 10,2022 public hearing directly conflicts with the next official meeting of Tamarack Village Board of Directors.The HOA meeting for May 1 Oth will be the first meeting since Tamarack Village residents were provided access to the drafted mitigation report for the townhomes project.The HOA Board of Directors meetings are over other month. I do not want to miss out on the events presented before the HOA Board of Directors nor do I want to miss the public hearing where much will be covered. Please provide me and my fellow residents this accommodation. Debra Topham 17893 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92647 E:debra@topham.com C: 714.642.5100 -----Original Message----- From:Ramos,Ricky<rramos@surfcity-hb.org> Sent:Wednesday,April 20,2022 8:25 AM To:Debra Topham<debra@topham.com> Cc:'Anabel Estrada'<anabel@tritzpm.com> Subject:RE: Comments to draft-mitigation-negative-declaration of Proposed Olson Residential Townhomes Project Hi Debra. I received your comments below. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From:Debra Topham<debra@topham.com> Sent:Wednesday,April 20,2022 2:40 AM To:Ramos,Ricky<rramos@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: 'Anabel Estrada'<anabel@tritzpm.com> Subject:Comments to draft-mitigation-negative-declaration of Proposed Olson Residential Townhomes Project Importance:High Dear Mr.Ramos and Huntington Beach City Planning Commission, Cc:Tritz Property Management Services to communicate to the Board of Directors for Tamarack Village HOA. I am a homeowner of 17893 Maggie Lane,Huntington Beach,CA 92647 and my condominium in Tamarack Village will be facing the proposed townhome proj ect. My comments relate to the Proposed Olson Townhomes Location: 8371-8461 Talbert Ave.(northwest corner at Newland St.)scheduled for opening 2024. ttl2s://www huntingtonbeachca.gov/government/departments/ lap nning/mAjor/maio r-projects-view.cfm?ID=1 I I I The Drafted Mitigated Negative Declaration No.21-003 must not be accepted as drafted and the project must not move forward as proposed.Further designs and studies must be submitted to the city planning commission to provide safe conditions for existing residents and those the project 642 purports to house. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(March 2022)for Olson Townhomes-Planning Application No.2021-0084 falls short in the following areas: a)Page 5 incorrectly characterizes the land use north of the project as "single family residential,residential low density"when my condominium is part of the 101-unit Tamarack Village.The other two corners of the major traffic intersection of Talbert and Newland are ALSO multi-family townhouses as you clearly have pictured on page 19 of 196. This falsely presents the project's impact on noise,air-flow,infrastructure,traffic and city resources. Further on page 34 of 196 the report falsely suggests this project will be"less than significant"on urbanization as mentioned is for the replacement of three existing farm-houses with the open-air landscaping. This project will create HIGH intensity dwellings both visually and by human occupancy. I request that the planning commission reject the 3-story design for only 2-story height limitations to not over-power the existing community. Page 39 of 196 shows the street sign of Jalm and fails to represent the beginning of our 101-unit multi-family complex. Without this representation,the city planning commission cannot make a fair decision on population and community density. b)The engineering company did not address the traffic impediments in Appendix I that is clearly a selling point on page 14 of the drafted report regarding"Site Access and Circulation.Vehicular access to the Project Site would be gained by two gated driveways." Elsewhere in the document,Newland is designated as the"main access"when it will be much safer to designate Talbert(even if it is a one-directional entrance). c)Page 16 of the drafted report does not state who will be responsible for significant interruptions and inconveniences to our existing homes as well as costly changes to Off-Site Improvements.The off-site civil work would consist of a water main connection in Newland Street,a sewer main connection and new utility access hole in Newland Street,conversion of existing driveways to curb and gutter at Talbert Avenue,a new driveway at Newland Street,a new driveway at Talbert Avenue,and the relocation of a storm drain catch basin at Talbert Avenue. What guarantees do we homeowners have that our access through Jalm and Stymie streets will not be impeded by this project? d)Page 49 of 196 does not address the emissions that will be created due to construction and re-paving of Newland and Talbert when sewer and drainage is upgraded to support the extra 34 units. SCAQMD's regional emissions thresholds have not been added to this report(as far as I could observe). e)Page 54 of 196 does not address how we as local residents within 200 feet of the site will be notified and protected during the asbestos abatement period. The developers have reports indicating the dangerous substance is present and it is an air-borne hazard! At what monetary rate will we be compensated for and re-located temporarily to avoid exposure to this carcinogen and others(like arsenic and lead in Table 8)for the 10 days of the abatement while the existing structures are leveled and cleared? Will the developers pay for our temporary hotel accommodations,food,and services during the 10 days? On page 94&95 of 196 the detection of lead is not expressed clearly-is this in line with California Prop 65 as an amount per kilogram of body weight or per kilogram of soil? The levels may be lower than US EPA but not California's office of environmental health. 643 f)Beginning on Page 11 I of 196 displays in Table 10 incompletely state the conditions of this project: Goal LU-1 D.Proposal falsely characterizes the surrounding community and fails to ensure the scale of the new project is in line with the existing residential structures that include multi-family units of two-stories and one-story. Goal LU-3 Project design will impede access to neighboring Jalm street and single-family homes and multi-family condominiums as well as limit ease of commutes through intersection of Talbert and Newland Goal LU-4 A and D: No other structures are three-stories tall so this project fails to conform to the City's planning goals.The construction of an 8foot fence topped by another 6 foot fence is a greater height than any other barrier in the vicinity. Goal CIRC-Ic B-G: Project traffic study in Appendix I(or H)?is a Complete failure to conform to city's goals by allowing property access off Newland, hindering traffic flow from Newland to Talbert because of"gate access", suggesting there is parking on Newland when that is not possible on the block where this land is located.Both ingress/egress must be from Talbert to avoid traffic calamities. There is NO LOGICAL WAY FOR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH A GATE TO BE OFF NEWLAND WITHOUT SEVERE CONSEQUENCES TO TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS. Just review the past two years of serious traffic accident reports that closed the Talbert and Newland intersection for a day-as it currently exists! Goal CIRC-Ic H.The commission traffic report conveniently did NOT explore any interruptions to our condominium complex nor the other two complexes at the same intersection. Goal ERC-13 has nothing to do with Moderate-income homeowners and their ability to access or not access rooftop solar systems.What is the message the developers are offering in this section? Goal N-4 What penalties will be applied to the developer if they do not complete the project by 2024 and we are exposed to undue construction noise and stress for longer periods of time? Where are penalties if the developer begins work prior to lam and continues past 1 Opm? There are no consequences listed in Appendix H. Goal PSI-9 This is missing the designation that new connections to water and sewer are required including interruptions to the roadways on Newland and Talbert. No mention of the party that will bear the costs?Will this be the City of HB? Will the developers pay for extra vermin control once the 2.1 acres are disrupting their homes(and likely move to our community)? 2013-2021 Housing Element Goal l and Goal 6 Brags that there will be rooftop solar PV systems to comply with the Green Building initiatives but this fails to address the ADDITIONAL HEIGHT that will be added to the three-story buildings! This is not incongruence with the surrounding residential structures and multi-family units. Is the quoted 35 foot high buildings including these rooftop installations? g)Pages 148 to 153 of 196 Transportation(part of 4.17)failed to take more than one day's measurements in September 2021 while COVID pandemic was restraining travels of most citizens. Table 16 has numerous values that are missing and marked as"not available"or"deficient operation".This element of the report reinforces that an incomplete traffic study was conducted by the developers'consultants. The traffic study poorly calculates the number 644 of persons living in 3-bedroom and 4-bedroom townhomes as 2.3 when it is more likely double or triple that number of inhabitants and their trips. The emergency access is not clearly marked(or consistently marked)on the proposed project Appendices and there is no physical possibility a full-sized fire truck or ladder truck can enter off of Newland-the designated"main entrance"especially when there will be two lanes of traffic in the southbound lanes! The fire department must be presented more reasonable circumstances and an accurate traffic report with dimensions of the surrounding area. Additional Appendices submitted by the Olson Urban Housing,LLC in defense of the draft-mitigated-negative-declaration require much closer scrutiny before finalizing and accepting the project proposals! This project is not congruent with the surrounding structures and offers less safety to our community. 1. I do not agree with the conclusions submitted with Appendices I Traffic Impact Study particularly regarding the proposed entrance and exits on Newland and the number of trips generated by the project. .Page 4-1 of the report only plans for"low rise"units when this project clearly includes two story and three story townhomes as presented in Appendix J. Therefore,the projected trip generation data is inappropriate, under-reported,and must be resubmitted with more realistic data. .Page 3-1 of the report failed to consider the traffic patterns in and out of Jalm,a cul-de-sac road that intersections Newland.Jahn provides a singular entrance to the Tamarack Village Homeowners who live off Pollard and Hawes as well as single family homes on Jalm.This short-coming in the report contributes significant bias in the Traffic Study and warrants a reconfiguration of the traffic pattern so the new project will only enter and exit from Talbert Avenue(never from Newland that borders the eastern side of the project). .Page 3-1 reported one weekday in September 2021 which is barely into the traffic recovery patterns following the COVID pandemic. This further under-reports the traffic impact of the project scheduled to open 2024. .The traffic study failed to demonstrate major retail area near the proposed project. The drawings failed to note the stop-light at the entrance to the Walmart and retail shopping center nor did the study consider the increase in retail-related traffic congestion. .The study failed to note the emergency vehicle usage by fire and ambulance on Talbert which leads to the City of Huntington Beach hospital. Without proper turning lanes for the northbound Newland traffic flow,cars will back up into the intersection of Talbert and Newland potentially interfere with critical emergency services or create unnecessary gridlock. Keep in mind, the report did not explore that vehicles turning left into the proposed project will be allowed to hold up northbound traffic on Newland during on and off peak times! The consultants did not look at the existing markings on the road to see that Newland does not permit a left turn at the proposed entrance! That Newland location is currently a turning lane into the westbound Talbert.The northbound vehicles would be waiting for the southbound three-lanes of traffic to clear creating a nightmare of congestion as well as create traffic violations. .The study failed to note that Talbert is a major thoroughfare to the southbound 405-freeway used extensively by the petroleum hauling semi-trucks that leave the processing facility at Gothard and Talbert. 2. I was not able to view impact reports that addressed Spectrum-Time Warner 645 Cable services to the project. Page 161 of 196 mentions Spectrum but there is no assessment by that company I could view. Where is the consideration for additional demands on internet and cable services to the project? What infrastructure is in place to maintain this essential service,particularly for those of us who work from home? What part of Appendix H and the Noise-Impact-Analysis addresses concerns that construction might interfere with internet and cable connections? 3. I disagree with the Appendix J assessment for sufficient parking spaces with this project. I have never parked my vehicle in a 0.5 space and would like to know how this is physically possible.This unrealistic report must be corrected to reflect only whole numbers for parking spaces per unit and per total project.I do not want to compete with the guests of these townhome units for spaces on the tiny cul-de-sac of Jahn that is already impacted. The townhomes must have only assigned,whole spaces to be a realistic report of the environmental impact.The study does not address if the townhomes will have driveways to accommodate more parked vehicles than the 2 garages that are currently designed with each unit.How can 16 guest parking spots accommodate 34 units? 4. I disagree with the design of 3-story units for the community aesthetics. This aspect of the plan must be rejected and limited to two-story units. No other multi-unit complexes that face Newland and Talbert are three-stories and this will affect the view and property value of my one-story condominium. Combined with an 8-foot wall and topped with a 6-foot fence, there is nothing appealing about my future views to the south!!! I'm sure the future homeowners will be happier because the developers offer on page 13 "The side of the residential units face the bio-swale feature and Talbert Avenue with no wall in order to maintain openness to the neighborhood and avoid a walled-off appearance." 5. I insist on a more stringent review of the Appendix A,Appendix I and Appendix J for consistency of the entrances and fire lanes. Appendix A shows a vehicular gate which will DRASTICALLY impede traffic now in and out of Newland and NONE of this is mentioned in Appendix I regarding traffic impact.Appendix A indicates a 20 foot wide fire lane;Appendix J indicates on page 3 of 20 there is no fire access road. What is true? Thank you for acknowledging my email and I look forward to your committee's work to redesign the project and to address my significant concerns! Debra Topham 17893 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92647 E: mai Ito:debra(&_tonhamcom C: 714.642.5100 646 Ramos, Ricky From: Gloria Rodriguez <glr92647@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 3:43 PM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: DMND 21-003 Hi, Rudy I'm Gloria Rodriguez. I live and own a condo at Tamarack Village. I've read the documentation for the new Olson Townhouses proposed at the corner of Talbert and Newland. I can also see that my neighbors concerns for safety, traffic, noise, parking, density,potential intrusion on our private property, etc does not meet the regulation standard for new significant information. However and like some of my neighbors, I too am concerned with more Newland traffic, street parking, density (more people, foot traffic) and potential intrusion on our property. Would Olson or the City be interested or willing to provide any solutions or alternatives which could allay our concerns? i 647 Ramos, Ricky From: Sam Hamdan <samhamdan@aol.com> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 10:26 PM To: Planning Commission Subject: Olson Residential Project Dear Planning Commission members, Our names are Samir Hamdan and Nawal Nasser, We own the single family home on 8482 Jalm Drive which we bought in 1991, made 2 separate improvement projects and are still living in it now after we retired. We are hereby expressing our opposition to zoning designation change on the 2 lots behind ours and our neighbors properties facing Talbert Avenue,that is being presented to you by the Olson Company. This change from residential low density to medium density, if approved, will allow the Olson Company to build 34 condominium units on the 2.07 acre of the combined 2 lots.The Company's plan is to build those units with 2 and 3 floors. This project will have devastating effects to our privacy,to the traffic and parking situation in the neighborhood and to the value of our properties. We urge you to consider our plea to deny the approval of this change. Sincerely Samir Hamdan, Nawal Nasser, 714-454-5404 1 648 ATTACHMENT #9 Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Planning Application No. 2021-0084 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Prepared for: J/ fe IB HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Contact: Ricky Ramos, Principal Planner Applicant: Olson Urban Housing, LLC 3010 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite 100 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Prepared By: 000 0 ❑❑❑ ❑❑0 moo 000 000 SAGECREST PLANNING+ENVIRONMENTAL 27128 Paseo Espada, Suite 1524 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 (714) 783-1863 Contact: Christine Saunders, Director Environmental Services April 2022 649 i JA Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ` Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 2 Response To Comments ......................................................................................................1 2.1 COMMENT LETTER 1—HANH VO.............................................................................................3 Response To Comment Letter A- Hanh Vo..........................................................................4 2.2 COMMENT LETTER B—JUDYJOHNSTON.....................................................................................5 Response To Comment Letter B—Judy Johnston.................................................................6 2.3 COMMENT LETTER C—CAROLINE KOUYOUMIIIAN........................................................................7 Response To Comment Letter C—Caroline Kouyoumijian....................................................8 2.4 COMMENT LETTER D—VINCENT BUI ........................................................................................9 Response To Comment Letter D—Vincent Bui...................................................................10 2.5 COMMENT LETTER E—STEPHANIE REID MCGINLEY(APRIL 8,2022)..............................................11 Response To Comment Letter E—Stephanie Reid Mcginley (April 8, 2022)........................12 2.6 COMMENT LETTER F—CINDY DO...........................................................................................13 Response To Comment Letter F—Cindy Do.......................................................................14 2.7 COMMENT LETTER G—MARTIN THIBAULT...............................................................................15 Response To Comment Letter G— Martin Thibault............................................................16 2.8 COMMENT LETTER H—CESAR MORALES..................................................................................17 Response To Comment Letter H —Cesar Morales ..............................................................18 2.9 COMMENT LETTER I—DEBRA TOPHAM....................................................................................19 Response To Comment Letter I —Debra Topham...............................................................24 2.10 COMMENT LETTER J—STEPHANIE REID MCGINLEY(APRIL 20, 2022).........................................30 Response To Comment Letter J —Stephanie Reid Mcginley...............................................33 2.11 COMMENT LETTER K—PAT ERDELYI....................................................................................34 Response To Comment Letter K— Pat Erdelyi ....................................................................35 2.12 COMMENT LETTER L—Amy RAY........................................................................................36 Response To Comment Letter L—Amy Ray........................................................................37 3 Revisions to the IS/MND....................................................................................................38 650 �� Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 `� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION A draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the proposed Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave (Proposed Project) and made available for public comment for a 20-day public review period from March 31, 2022, to April 20, 2022. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15074(b) (14 CCR 15074(b)), before approving the Proposed Project, the City of Huntington Beach, as the lead agency under CEQA, will consider the MND with any comments received during this public review period. Specifically, Section 15074(b) of the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15074(b)) states the following: "Prior to approving a project, the decision-making body of the lead agency shall consider the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process. The decision-making body shall adopt the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration only if it finds on the basis of the whole record before it (including the initial study and any comments received), that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration reflects the lead agency's independent judgment and analysis." 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The organizations, persons, and public agencies that provided substantive written comments on the environmental issues addressed within the IS/MND are listed in Table 1. Although CEQA (California Public Resources Code,Section 21000 et seq.)and the CEQA Guidelines(14 CCR 15000 et seq.) do not explicitly require a lead agency to provide written responses to comments received on a proposed IS/MND, the lead agency may do so voluntarily. A copy of each letter with bracketed comment numbers on the right margin is followed by the response for each comment as indexed in the letter. Comment letters and specific comments are given letters and numbers for reference purposes. The following responses to comments include a summary statement to identify if the response will introduce "new significant information" under any of the four categories identified in Section 15088 et seq. of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines or if it does not introduce "new significant information."The four general categories are: • New significant impacts • Significant increases in the severity of impacts • Feasible alternatives or mitigation that would reduce significant impacts • Identification of inadequacies in the analysis The comments submitted do not invalidate the findings in the IS/MND or require additional analysis or mitigation to be incorporated. No new information, new impacts, or deficiencies are identified that have not been addressed by the IS/MND. Therefore, the IS/MND remains the appropriate and reasonable determination as determined by the Lead Agency. Responses to comments are provided herein. 651 i "Je �� Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave 0 Planning Application No. 2021-0084 HUNT1NG70N BEACH INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Table 1-Organizations, Persons, and Public Agencies that Commented on the IS/MND Comment Letter Commenting Organization,Person,or Public Agency Date 1 Hanh Vo April 4, 2022 2 Judy Johnston April 6, 2022 3 Caroline Kouyoumijian April 7, 2022 4 Vincent Bui April 7, 2022 5 Stephanie Reid McGinley April 8, 2022 6 Cindy Do April 8, 2022 7 Martin Thibault April 11, 2022 8 Cesar Morales April 18, 2022 9 Debra Topham April 20, 2022 10 Stephanie Reid McGinley April 20, 2022 11 Pat Erdelyi April 20, 2022 12 Amy Ray April 20, 2022 652 2.1 Comment Letter A— Hanh Vo From: hanh vo To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: PROJECT AT 8371-8461 TARBERT AVE, HB Date: Monday,April 4, 2022 10:28:57 PM DEAR MR RAMOS, WE ARE 100% SAYING NO TO THIS PROJECT! A_1 THANK YOU 17943 POINT REYES ST, FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708 714 488 2425 653 i Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter A- Hanh Vo Comment A-1: Comment A-1 pertains to general opposition to the Proposed Project. Comment A-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 654 2.2 Comment Letter B —Judy Johnston From: Judy White Johnston To: Ramos. Ricky Subject: Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 Date: Wednesday,April 6, 2022 5:08:53 PM Good Afternoon, I am writing concerning the planned development at the corner of Newland and Talbert. I understand the need for growth in the population in our city(I work for a school district in this community with declining enrollment). I also understand the need for safety in a community and hope that in this situation a balance can be found between the two. I love in Tamarack Village, which is on the same corner as this proposed complex. Some notes of caution in regards to a new complex with 34 new condominiums. 1. Traffic Safety-Talbert and Newland is already a busy intersection. I have been awakened and startled in the middle of dinner with the sounds of crashes at the intersection. With the addition of 34 homes and a potential of 68+ more drivers coming and going each day, this will make this area even busier. For B-1 residents exiting onto Newland from Jalm and Stymie, it is very difficult getting a chance to pull out safely at many times of the day. Due to this, I have seen many people pull out rapidly and just miss potential collisions. Adding so many more residents in such a small area without extra lights will make this situation worse. 2. Parking - I hope that whatever is approved has enough parking to fill the needs of the residents and their guests. If not, I would hope the number of units would b reduced to include more parking. Without the necessary parking a the new location, I am afraid that the spillover will affect our community that is already struggling to find parking in the current economic environment where residents are forced to live together from different"households"to afford to pay rent. In our 104 unit community, there are usually more than an average of 2 cars per unit and most cannot access their garages because of the space needed to store essentials. I have lived here for over 10 years and each year as the prices go up, the parking has become more of a premium (I actually do park in my garage and in our parking spot- but at one time my 2 adult children lived with us forcing the need for 4 parking spots), it has become more difficult to find a parking spot at our visitor spots and on Jalm. The residents of single resident homes on B-2 Jalm hardly get a spot on the street. Add to that the neighborhood on the northeast corner of Talbert and Newland. They are a "private"community and don't allow parking in their neighborhood. Because of that, I have seen people running across Newland from that neighborhood to Jalm where they parked. How fair is that? The single story units farther north from us have to be asked not to park in our visitor spots because it is our private property. We sometimes have to park across Newland near the greenbelt when we have guests coming over so they have a place to park(our spot). When my children lived with us, it was not uncommon for my son to park over there every day. With these added residents so close, without a doubt they and their guests will be fighting for an already limited amount of parking. Don't make us become another area like the condos on Adams in HB where I had to drive around for 20 minutes just to find a spot when I was looking to purchase a condo there 10 years ago. 3. Appearance-With the height of the buildings next to this proposed complex being much shorter, 3 story units seem a little high and it does distract from the aesthetics of a community. Are they going to cram the apartments in like they did on Beach and Ellis where the sidewalk goes right to the front? These B-3 tall buildings crammed into small spaces does not look good for the community. They look out of place and I have had several comments from other residents and out of town family about the placement of these buildings. You can't just throw things in anywhere. I appreciate the time spent to get feedback from the community. I hope that a balance can be reached in the decisions made. Thank you Judy Johnston 655 1 14"#& Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave egi � Planning Application No. 2021-0084 `�'' INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter B—Judy Johnston Comment B-1: This comment expresses concerns regarding the traffic on Talbert and Newland intersection and increasing the traffic on Newland with the Project Site entry on Newland.The traffic study shows that this intersection is currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service, and that the Proposed Project would not substantially worsen traffic operations at this intersection. Comment B-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 13-2: This comment expresses concerns about the provision of adequate parking within the Project Site to prevent spillover parking along Newland and in the neighborhoods. Comment B-2 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment B-3: The comment expresses concern about the height of the townhomes and aesthetics of the community. Comment B-3 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of these comments. 656 2.3 Comment Letter C — Caroline Kouyoumijian From: Caroline Kouyoumjian To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: NO TO PROJECT Date: Thursday,April 7, 2022 10:41:02 AM Hello, My name is Caroline and my house backs Talbert Avenue and we CANNOT have more traffic. C-1 The sound of the cars on the street is already unbearable. Thank you, Caroline 657 i J� Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Planning Application No. 2021-0084 HUNTiNGTON BEACH INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter C—Caroline Kouyoumijian Comment C-1: This comment letter expresses concerns about the traffic noise generated by the Proposed Project. Table 14 (IS/MND, Page 125) shows that the Proposed Project's permanent roadway noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the FTA's allowable increase thresholds. Comment C-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 658 2.4 Comment Letter D —Vincent Bui From: vincent bui To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: No to Major Project ID 1111 Date: Thursday,April 7,2022 6:01:44 PM Ricky, https://www.huntinatonbeachca.aov/aovernment/departments/planniny/­major/major-projects-view.cfm? ID=1111 got public notice from city of Huntington Beach about major proposed development 1111 near corner of Talbert and Newland. D-1 I live nearby the corder and on cape cod ave fountain valley ca 92708 and would like to raise my concern since the road are so crowded in the morning and afternoon and the city of Huntington Beach should not allow any density residential development other than single home since there are no new road built-- my major concern. Thank you very much for your time. Vincent Bui 659 J "J& � Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTiNGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter D—Vincent Bui Comment D-1: This comment expresses concerns regarding the traffic near the Talbert and Newland intersection.The traffic study shows that this intersection is currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service, and that the Proposed Project would not substantially worsen traffic operations at this intersection. Comment D-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 660 2.5 Comment Letter E — Stephanie Reid McGinley (April 8, 2022) From: Stephanie Reid McGinley To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: DMND 21-003 Date: Friday,April 8, 2022 10:58:24 AM Hello, I am a resident and owner in the Tamarack Village community adjacent to the proposed 34 unit development currently underway at the northwest corner of Talbert and Newland. I have concerns regarding parking in this area. We are already struggling with a shortage of parking in our community, as well as the neighboring single family homes on Jahn and E-1 Newland. The street parking is completely full every night and we are having issues with illegal parking in our complex from the neighboring apartment homes. We have also had issues with petty theft from vehicles, as well and mail theft. Having the E-2 increase of traffic (vehicle and foot) will no doubt bring more of this to our community. I would like to know how many parking spaces will be included in this new development? E-3 Medium density housing tends to have a much higher need for this (2+ spots per unit). Also how much outdoor green space will be available on the proposed property? Having non- residents walking their pets in our community causes problems with pet waste being left E-4 behind, as well as concerns about the safety of our children playing outdoors, and just general community safety and security with increased traffic. Thank for your time. Stephanie 661 i ''ile') Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTiNGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter E—Stephanie Reid McGinley(April 8, 2022) Comment E-1: This comment expresses concern about parking. Comment E-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment E-2: This comment expresses concerns regarding increased theft. Comment E-2 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment E-3: This comment requests information on the number of parking spaces in the Proposed Project. The Project Site contains a total of 68 garage parking spaces, 16 guest spaces, and one American with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant guest stall. Comment E-3 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment E-4: This comment requests information on green space available on the proposed property. As described in the Project Description (IS/MND, Page 7) and Landscape Plan (Figure 9, Page 19) three courtyards (or paseos) are interspersed throughout the community with a larger central green open space serving as the focal point for community and recreation. The central paseo would include a shade structure with tables, seating, and a fireplace with sectional-style. Most units gain access from the paseos and may include enclosed patio spaces.Along the entire stretch of the Talbert frontage, a "dry creek" bio-swale would collect and treat storm water,which would double as a semi-natural feature and provide a buffer to Talbert Avenue. The side of the residential units face the bio-swale feature and Talbert Avenue with no wall in order to maintain openness to the neighborhood and avoid a walled-off appearance. Comment E-4 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of these comments. 662 2.6 Comment Letter F — Cindy Do From: Cindy Do To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Date: Friday,April 8,2022 9:51:18 PM Dear Mr. Ramos: I live at the northeast corner of Talbert and Newland. I'm writing to you to oppose the proposed construction of 34-unit townhomes on the 2.1 acre land at the northwest corner of Talbert and Newland- which is directly across from my home. My concern is that this project will increase traffic congestion and noise in the area. F-1 Sincerely, Cindy Do 663 i 1A"teOlson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ` Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter F—Cindy Do Comment F-1: This comment expresses concerns that the project will increase traffic and noise in the area. The traffic study shows that the street network is currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service, and that the Proposed Project would not substantially worsen traffic operations in the area. Table 14 (IS/MND, Page 125) shows that the Proposed Project's permanent roadway noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the FTA's allowable increase thresholds. Comment F-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 664 2.7 Comment Letter G — Martin Thibault From: Martin Thibault Construction To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: NO TO PROJECT Date: Monday,April 11, 2022 2:12:23 PM NO TO THE PROJECT SITE 8371-8461 TALBERT AVE. G-1 MARTIN THIBAULT 665 i Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter G— Martin Thibault Comment G-1: Comment G-1 pertains to general opposition to the Proposed Project. Comment G-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 666 2.8 Comment Letter H — Cesar Morales From: Gunter Morales To: Ramos. Ricky Cc: Patricia Valenzuela Subject: Re: Requesting Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No 21-003 Date: Tuesday,April 19,2022 8:01:52 AM Happy Tuesday, Mr. Ramos. I am concerned about the zoning change from low density to medium density proposed in the declaration. I understand such change, if granted, would be permanent, which would open the door for H-1 similar developments in the area and create the unwanted byproducts of traffic dangers, parking, petty theft, etc. Also, I am concerned about the proposed main entrance on Newland because the space is H-2 very reduced at that point(between Jelm and Talbert)and a minor delay in the entrance to the building would create a traffic hazard on Newland, which is typically a streamlined route. Has a date been set for the public hearing? Thank you for your assistance. H-3 Cesar Morales On Monday, April 18, 2022, 09:47:17 AM PDT, Ramos, Ricky <rramos@surfcity-hb.org>wrote: Good morning Cesar— Here is the link: https://www.huntingtonbeachca.goy/government/departments/ lap nning/major/major- projects-view.cfm?1 D=1111 The MND is listed as Attachment 2. Let me know if I can provide further assistance. Thanks. From: Gunter Morales <guntermorales@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 7:28 AM To: Ramos, Ricky <rramos@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Requesting Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration No 21-003 Dear Mr. Ramos, I'm interested in reviewing the document but am unable to access it online using the link provided in the public notice sent to my house. Can you pls send it to me as a PDF attachment or provide a direct link? Thank you for your assistance. Cesar Morales 17892 Pollard Ln. HB, CA 92647 667 J "Off � Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ` Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter H—Cesar Morales Comment H-1: This comment expresses concern regarding the rezoning from low density to medium density. Comment H-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment H-2: This comment expresses concerns about the Newland Street entrance being the main entrance and causing additional traffic delays on Newland Street.At the Newland Street driveway,the off- street portion of the driveway prior to encountering the gate would allow two vehicles to queue while the gate is opening. The number of trips generated from the proposed units would not be expected to result in three or more vehicles arriving at the same time. In addition to the Newland Street entrance, the Talbert Avenue entrance would provide a secondary vehicular access to the Project Site. The Traffic Impact Study included a vehicle gap study to determine the number of gaps in the existing stream of traffic to accommodate vehicles entering and exiting the project driveway on Newland Street. Based on the gap analysis, adequate gap in the traffic flow on Newland Street north of Talbert is expected to be available to sufficiently accommodate the right and left turns in and out of the Project Site driveways. Comment H-2 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment H-3: The comment requests information on the date for the public hearing. Subsequent to the public comment period, a public hearing will be scheduled before the Planning Commission and City Council beginning tentatively in May/June 2022. The public hearing will be separately noticed. For further information, please contact Ricky Ramos at (714) 536-5624. Comment H-3 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of these comments. 668 2.9 Comment Letter I — Debra Topham From: Debra Topham To: Ramos, Ricky Cc: "Anabel Estrada" Subject: Comments to draft-mitigation-negative-declaration of Proposed Olson Residential Townhomes Project Date: Wednesday,April 20, 2022 2:39:59 AM Importance: High Dear Mr.Ramos and Huntington Beach City Planning Commission, Cc:Tritz Property Management Services to communicate to the Board of Directors for Tamarack Village HOA. I am a homeowner of 17893 Maggie Lane,Huntington Beach,CA 92647 and my I-1 condominium in Tamarack Village will be facing the proposed townhome proj ect. My comments relate to the Proposed Olson Townhomes Location: 8371-8461 Talbert Ave.(northwest corner at Newland St.)scheduled for opening 2024. https://www,liuntingtonbeachca.gov/government/departments/ laD iiniiig/majorhnaio r-projects-view.cfm?I13=1 I I l The Drafted Mitigated Negative Declaration No.21-003 must not be accepted as drafted and the project must not move forward as proposed.Further designs and studies must be submitted to the city planning commission to provide safe conditions for existing residents and those the project purports to house. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration(March 2022)for Olson Townhomes-Planning Application No.2021-0084 falls short in the following areas: a)Page 5 incorrectly characterizes the land use north of the project as "single family residential,residential low density"when my condominium is part of the 101-unit Tamarack Village.The other two corners of the major traffic intersection of Talbert and Newland are ALSO multi-family townhouses as you clearly have pictured on page 19 of 196. This falsely presents the project's impact on noise,air-flow,infrastructure,traffic and city resources. Further on page 34 of 196 the report falsely suggests this 1-2 project will be"less than significant" on urbanization as mentioned is for the replacement of three existing farm-houses with the open-air landscaping. This project will create HIGH intensity dwellings both visually and by human occupancy. I request that the planning commission reject the 3-story design for only 2-story height limitations to not over-power the existing community. Page 39 of 196 shows the street sign of Jalm and fails to represent the beginning of our 101-unit multi-family complex. Without this representation,the city planning commission cannot make a fair decision on population and community density. b)The engineering company did not address the traffic impediments in Appendix I that is clearly a selling point on page 14 of the drafted report 1-3 regarding"Site Access and Circulation.Vehicular access to the Project Site would be gained by two gated driveways." Elsewhere in the document,Newland is designated as the"main access"when it will be much safer to designate Talbert(even if it is a one-directional entrance). c)Page 16 of the drafted report does not state who will be responsible for significant interruptions and inconveniences to our existing homes as well 1-4 as costly changes to Off-Site Improvements. The off-site civil work would 669 consist of a water main connection in Newland Street,a sewer main connection and new utility access hole in Newland Street,conversion of existing driveways to curb and gutter at Talbert Avenue,a new driveway at 1-4 Newland Street,a new driveway at Talbert Avenue,and the relocation of a (continued) storm drain catch basin at Talbert Avenue. What guarantees do we homeowners have that our access through Jalm and Stymie streets will not be impeded by this project? d)Page 49 of 196 does not address the emissions that will be created due to construction and re-paving of Newland and Talbert when sewer and drainage is 1-5 upgraded to support the extra 34 units. SCAQMD's regional emissions thresholds have not been added to this report(as far as I could observe). e)Page 54 of 196 does not address how we as local residents within 200 feet of the site will be notified and protected during the asbestos abatement period. The developers have reports indicating the dangerous substance is present and it is an air-borne hazard! At what monetary rate will we be compensated for and re-located temporarily to avoid exposure to this 1-6 carcinogen and others(like arsenic and lead in Table 8)for the 10 days of the abatement while the existing structures are leveled and cleared? Will the developers pay for our temporary hotel accommodations,food,and services during the 10 days? On page 94&95 of 196 the detection of lead is not expressed clearly-is this in line with California Prop 65 as an amount per kilogram of body weight or per kilogram of soil? The levels may be lower than US EPA but not California's office of environmental health. f)Beginning on Page 1 I 1 of 196 displays in Table 10 incompletely state the conditions of this project: Goal LU-1 D. Proposal falsely characterizes the surrounding community and fails to ensure the scale of the new project is in line with the existing residential structures that include multi-family units of two-stories and 1-7 one-story. Goal LU-3 Project design will impede access to neighboring Jalm street and single-family homes and multi-family condominiums as well as limit ease of commutes through intersection of Talbert and Newland Goal LU-4 A and D: No other structures are three-stories tall so this project fails to conform to the City's planning goals.The construction of an 8foot fence topped by another 6 foot fence is a greater height than any other barrier in the vicinity. Goal CIRC-1c B-G: Project traffic study in Appendix I (or H)?is a Complete failure to conform to city's goals by allowing property access off Newland, hindering traffic flow from Newland to Talbert because of"gate access", 1-8 suggesting there is parking on Newland when that is not possible on the block where this land is located.Both ingress/egress must be from Talbert to avoid traffic calamities. There is NO LOGICAL WAY FOR THE MAIN ENTRANCE WITH A GATE TO BE OFF NEWLAND WITHOUT SEVERE CONSEQUENCES TO TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS. Just review the past two years of serious traffic accident reports that closed the Talbert and Newland intersection for a day-as it currently exists! Goal CIRC-1c H. The commission traffic report conveniently did NOT explore 1-9 any interruptions to our condominium complex nor the other two complexes at the same intersection. Goal ERC-13 has nothing to do with Moderate-income homeowners and their ability to access or not access rooftop solar systems.What is the message I-10 the developers are offering in this section? 670 Goal N-4 What penalties will be applied to the developer if they do not complete the project by 2024 and we are exposed to undue construction noise I-11 and stress for longer periods of time? Where are penalties if the developer begins work prior to lam and continues past 1 Opm? There are no consequences listed in Appendix H. Goal PSI-9 This is missing the designation that new connections to water and sewer are required including interruptions to the roadways on Newland and Talbert. No mention of the party that will bear the costs?Will this be the I-12 City of HB? Will the developers pay for extra vermin control once the 2.1 acres are disrupting their homes(and likely move to our community)? 2013-2021 Housing Element Goal 1 and Goal 6 Brags that there will be rooftop solar PV systems to comply with the Green Building initiatives but this fails to address the ADDITIONAL HEIGHT that will be added to the three-story I-13 buildings! This is not incongruence with the surrounding residential structures and multi-family units. Is the quoted 35 foot high buildings including these rooftop installations? g)Pages 148 to 153 of 196 Transportation(part of 4.17)failed to take more than one day's measurements in September 2021 while COVID pandemic was restraining travels of most citizens. Table 16 has numerous values that are missing and marked as "not available"or"deficient operation".This element of the report reinforces that an incomplete traffic study was conducted by the developers'consultants. The traffic study poorly calculates the number of persons living in 3-bedroom and 4-bedroom townhomes as 2.3 when it is 1-14 more likely double or triple that number of inhabitants and their trips. The emergency access is not clearly marked(or consistently marked)on the proposed project Appendices and there is no physical possibility a full-sized fire truck or ladder truck can enter off of Newland-the designated"main entrance" especially when there will be two lanes of traffic in the southbound lanes! The fire department must be presented more reasonable circumstances and an accurate traffic report with dimensions of the surrounding area. Additional Appendices submitted by the Olson Urban Housing,LLC in defense of the draft-mitigated-negative-declaration require much closer scrutiny 1-15 before finalizing and accepting the project proposals! This project is not congruent with the surrounding structures and offers less safety to our community. 1. I do not agree with the conclusions submitted with Appendices I Traffic Impact Study particularly regarding the proposed entrance and exits on Newland and the number of trips generated by the project. .Page 4-1 of the report only plans for"low rise"units when this project clearly includes two story and three story townhomes as presented in Appendix J. Therefore,the projected trip generation data is inappropriate, under-reported,and must be resubmitted with more realistic data. 1-16 .Page 3-1 of the report failed to consider the traffic patterns in and out of Jahn,a cul-de-sac road that intersections Newland.Jalm provides a singular entrance to the Tamarack Village Homeowners who live off Pollard and Hawes as well as single family homes on Jalm.This short-coming in the report contributes significant bias in the Traffic Study and warrants a reconfiguration of the traffic pattern so the new project will only enter and exit from Talbert Avenue(never from Newland that borders the eastern 671 side of the project). .Page 3-1 reported one weekday in September 2021 which is barely into the traffic recovery patterns following the COVID pandemic. This further under-reports the traffic impact of the project scheduled to open 2024. .The traffic study failed to demonstrate major retail area near the proposed project. The drawings failed to note the stop-light at the entrance to the Walmart and retail shopping center nor did the study consider the increase in retail-related traffic congestion. .The study failed to note the emergency vehicle usage by fire and ambulance on Talbert which leads to the City of Huntington Beach hospital. Without proper turning lanes for the northbound Newland traffic flow,cars will back up into the intersection of Talbert and Newland potentially interfere with critical emergency services or create unnecessary gridlock. Keep in mind, the report did not explore that vehicles turning left into the proposed 1-16 project will be allowed to hold up northbound traffic on Newland during on and off peak times! The consultants did not look at the existing markings on the road to see that Newland does not permit a left turn at the proposed entrance! That Newland location is currently a turning lane into the westbound Talbert.The northbound vehicles would be waiting for the southbound three-lanes of traffic to clear creating a nightmare of congestion as well as create traffic violations. .The study failed to note that Talbert is a major thoroughfare to the southbound 405-freeway used extensively by the petroleum hauling semi-trucks that leave the processing facility at Gothard and Talbert. 2. 1 was not able to view impact reports that addressed Spectrum-Time Warner Cable services to the project.Page 161 of 196 mentions Spectrum but there is no assessment by that company I could view.Where is the consideration for additional demands on internet and cable services to the project? What 1-17 infrastructure is in place to maintain this essential service,particularly for those of us who work from home? What part of Appendix H and the Noise-Impact-Analysis addresses concerns that construction might interfere with internet and cable connections? 3. 1 disagree with the Appendix J assessment for sufficient parking spaces with this project. I have never parked my vehicle in a 0.5 space and would like to know how this is physically possible.This unrealistic report must be corrected to reflect only whole numbers for parking spaces per unit and per total project.I do not want to compete with the guests of these townhome units for spaces on the tiny cul-de-sac of Jalm that is already 1-18 impacted. The townhomes must have only assigned,whole spaces to be a realistic report of the environmental impact.The study does not address if the townhomes will have driveways to accommodate more parked vehicles than the 2 garages that are currently designed with each unit.How can 16 guest parking spots accommodate 34 units? 4.I disagree with the design of 3-story units for the community aesthetics. This aspect of the plan must be rejected and limited to two-story units. No other multi-unit complexes that face Newland and Talbert are three-stories and this will affect the view and property value of my one-story condominium. Combined with an 8-foot wall and topped with a 6-foot fence, 1-19 there is nothing appealing about my future views to the south!!! I'm sure the future homeowners will be happier because the developers offer on page 13 "The side of the residential units face the bio-swale feature and Talbert Avenue with no wall in order to maintain openness to the neighborhood and avoid a walled-off appearance." 672 5.I insist on a more stringent review of the Appendix A,Appendix I and Appendix J for consistency of the entrances and fire lanes. Appendix A shows a vehicular gate which will DRASTICALLY impede traffic flow in and out 1-20 of Newland and NONE of this is mentioned in Appendix I regarding traffic impact.Appendix A indicates a 20 foot wide fire lane;Appendix J indicates on page 3 of 20 there is no fire access road. What is true? Thank you for acknowledging my email and I look forward to your committee's work to redesign the project and to address my significant concerns! Debra Topham 17893 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92647 E: mai Ito:debra&tonham.coin C: 714.642.5100 673 a �A"Aff & Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter I—Debra Topham Comment 1-1: This comment identifies that the Tamarack Village will be facing the Project Site. According to aerial imagery,the Tamarack Village townhomes are separated from the Project Site to the north by a block of single-family residences and Jalm Drive. Comment 1-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-2: This comment expresses concerns regarding incorrect characterization of the surrounding land uses. a) The land use north of the project is characterized as "single family residential, residential low density". Response:The land use bordering the northern property line of the Project Site is single- family residential, residential low density.Tamarack Village is located further north of the Project Site, across Jalm Drive, and is zoned Residential Medium Density. Comment 1-2(a) does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. b) There are multi-family homes on the southeast and northeast corner of Talbert and Newland. Response: The City of Fountain Valley's General Plan Designation for the southeast and northeast corners of the Talbert/Newland intersection is Low Medium Density Residential (up to 10.8 DU/AC) and the zoning classification is "Garden Homes", which is defined in the City of Fountain Valley's Municipal Code Section 21.08.020 (2) as "applies to parcels appropriate for detached, single-family dwellings on smaller parcels". The land use immediately east of the Project Site is detached, single-family dwellings on smaller parcels, consistent with the General Plan and zoning.The existing conditions of the entire project area were analyzed in the noise and traffic studies performed for the Proposed Project, which identified that potential impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Comment 1-2(b) does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. c) Disagrees with the IS/MND finding on PDF page 34 of "less than significant" for urbanization. Response:The analysis on the IS/MND (Page 27, Aesthetics) addressed the threshold I: If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?The Proposed Project is consistent with the residential character of the surrounding area. The Proposed Project would remove the existing single-family residences and replace them with a 34-unit townhome complex, with the additional density reserved for moderate-income affordable housing which is allowed under State Density Bonus law. Based on the City's residential population factor 674 Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS of 2.257 people per unit, it is estimated the development would support 76 residents. Two-story units would be the northern-most units of all buildings across the Project Site, which provides a two-story buffer for the existing single-family residences backing to the shared north property line. As the buildings approach the Talbert Avenue frontage, all plan types increase to three stories in height. The Applicant is requesting a zone change from residential low density to medium density which will allow the Proposed Project to be built at the density requested. The zone change is consistent with the vicinity as the north side of Jalm Drive is medium density, and the southeast and northeast intersection of Newland Drive and Talbert Ave is zoned by the City of Fountain Valley as "Garden Homes" which are single-family residential with density up to 10.8 DU/AC.The GH zoning district is consistent with the low-medium density residential land use designation of the City of Fountain Valley's General Plan. Comment I(c) does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. d) The photos do not identify the Tamarack Village townhome complex on the north side of Jalm Drive that exist as medium density residential; therefore, the Planning Commission cannot adequately make a fair decision as to population and community density. Response: Comment 1-2(d) does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-3: The comment expresses concern regarding site access and circulation for the driveways on Newland and Talbert. At the Newland Street driveway, the off-street portion of the driveway prior to encountering the gate would allow two vehicles to queue while the gate is opening. The number of trips generated from the proposed units would not be expected to result in three or more vehicles arriving at the same time. In addition to the Newland Street entrance, the Talbert Avenue entrance would provide a secondary vehicular access to the Project Site. The Traffic Impact Study included a vehicle gap study to determine the number of gaps in the existing stream of traffic to accommodate vehicles entering and exiting the primary project driveway on Newland Street. Based on the gap analysis, adequate gap in the traffic flow on Newland Street north of Talbert is expected to be available to sufficiently accommodate the right and left turns in and out of the project site driveways. Comment 1-3 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-4: The comment expresses concern over construction management of off-site improvements. Project construction will be required to follow all City regulations with respect to construction in roadways including but not limited to following an approved traffic management plan to ensure residents and emergency services have full access during construction. Comment 1-4 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. 675 .AA te Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Comment 1-5: This comment asserts that the IS/MND did not address the emissions associated with off-site improvements and that SCAQMD regional emissions thresholds were not addressed in this report. This is not correct. The AQ/GHG study analyzed the gross 2.43-acres of the Project Site, which includes the curb, gutter, sidewalk, and a portion of the asphalt street for both Newland and Talbert. SCAQMD regional construction thresholds and related impacts are presented in Table 2(Page 42), and regional operational thresholds and related impacts are presented in Table 3 (Page 43). Regional emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds, therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Comment 1-5 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-6 The comment expresses concern over the asbestos removal and potential hazards to neighbors during the removal process.As discussed in the IS/MND,the Applicant is required to comply with all state regulations regarding asbestos procedures, including SCAQMD Rule 1403. Asbestos abatement procedures are also identified in multiple state regulations that identify proper handling designed to protect workers during abatement and methods of disposal that protect the general public. Comment 1-6 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-7 This comment asserts that the land use conditions of the project are incompletely stated. The Project Consistency Analysis presented in Table 10 discusses how the Proposed Project is consistent with General Plan Goals and Policies. Comment 1-7 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-8 The comment asserts that the traffic study did not conform with the City's goals. This is not correct. The traffic study was prepared according to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines and approved by the City's traffic engineer. Comment 1-8 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-9 The comment asserts that the traffic study did not explore interruptions to traffic at Jalm Drive and Newland Street. Based on the Proposed Project's traffic generation and assignment, the Proposed Project did not warrant the analysis of Jalm Drive at Newland Avenue, as it would not contribute traffic to the critical movements of this intersection (i.e., left turns in or out of the minor street). The through volume of project traffic along Newland Street (2 peak hour vehicles) would not be sufficient to significantly degrade level of service operations, hence it did not 676 i Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 HUNTINGTON BEACH INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RESPONSE TO COMMENTS warrant analysis. Comment 1-9 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND.Comment 1-10 The comment related to moderate income homeowners and their ability to access rooftop solar systems. Comment 1-10 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-11: The comment asks what penalties the City would impose if the Project is not constructed by 2024, or does construction work prior to lam or after 10pm. Comment 1-11 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-12: The comment involves questions about water and sewer connections and pest control during construction. Comment 1-12 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-13 This comment raises concerns that the additional height of the structures in the application does not include the height with the solar systems. Comment 1-13 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-14: The comment contains a number of assertions related to the traffic study. Traffic counts were conducted in accordance with City guidelines, which allow for one day of counts during peak hours of the day.At the time,COVID restrictions had been lifted (such as, no stay-at-home orders, offices and retail open, public gatherings permitted, etc.)and it was deemed that the new normal conditions were present, hence no adjustment factors were made to traffic counts. Regarding Table 16, the missing values marked "- -" in Table 16 indicate that analysis methodology (V/C ratio or Delay) is not applicable to that particular intersection. Signalized intersections are analyzed using V/C methodology and unsignalized intersection are analyzed based on Delay.The "N/A" means that the intersection does not currently exist under existing conditions. The commentor is incorrect in stating that values are marked as deficient operation. No deficient operations are shown in Table 16 (a deficient operation would be indicated by bold text). The final emergency access plan for the Proposed Project will be reviewed and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to approval of building permits. Comment 1-14 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-15: The comment asserts that appendices provided by the Applicant should be further reviewed. Comment 1-15 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. 677 Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 HUNTINGTON BEACH INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Comment 1-16: The comment asserts that the commenter disagrees with conclusions in the Traffic Impact Study. According to Institute of Traffic Engineers, multi-family low-rise dwelling units generate higher number of trips than mid-rise dwelling units. Therefore, the analysis is conservative and overestimates the project trip generation by using the low-rise trip rate. The intersection of Talbert Avenue and Walmart shopping center was not included in the study area for the Proposed Project because it does not contribute a significant number of trips to this location.The Proposed Project is expected to add only one peak hourtrip to this intersection. Based on Huntington Beach standards, only intersections where a project would contribute 50 or more peak hour trips are included in the study area.The contribution of 1 peak hour trip would not significantly affect level of service operations this intersection. Regarding northbound lefts into the site from Newland, the northbound left into the Project Site is a legal/permitted movement.The Traffic Impact Study performed a level of service operations analysis and a vehicle gap study to determine the adequacy of vehicles making a left turn in and out of the site on Newland. The results showed that adequate level of service and gaps would be present to allow the left turns. All vehicles, including trucks,were counted as part of the existing conditions.Additional comments have been addressed in response to previous comments in this response to comments. Comment 1-16 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-17: The comment expresses concern related to cable and internet in the area, especially during construction. The Project Site is located in an urbanized area that is adequately served by all existing utilities. Comment 1-17 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-18: The comment expresses concern related to adequacy of parking. Comment 1-17 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-19: The comment expresses disagreement with the design of the Proposed Project. Comment 1-19 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment 1-20: This comment relates to consistency in Appendices related to fire lanes. Comment 1-20 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. 678 [line! Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave rgPlanning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUN'nNGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of these comments. 679 2.10 Comment Letter J — Stephanie Reid McGinley (April 20, 2022) From: Stephanie Reid McGinley To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Re: DMND 21-003 Date: Wednesday,April 20, 2022 11:15:08 AM Thank Ricky, I'd also like to voice my concerns about the vehicle entrance to the proposed development. That section of Newland is already very busy and having the entrance so close to both the intersection and Jalm St. poses a traffic hazard. It will also be a noise disturbance for the J-1 single family home on the corner of Jalm having the high traffic entrance so close to their property. Perhaps it should be moved to the opposite corner on Talbert by the Church. Stephanie On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 10:27 AM Ramos, Ricky<rramosnsurfcity-hb.org>wrote: Portions of this project's Talbert frontage will be red curb for fire lane. However, the segments not red curbed will be available for parking. I don't know if the HOA will have restrictions on pet ownership. J-2 From: Stephanie Reid McGinley<stephanie.a.r(@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 10:01 AM To: Ramos, Ricky<rramos(@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Re: DMND 21-003 Thanks Ricky, Will they be allowing street parking on that side of Talbert as well? That would really help prevent any issues with parking as a 3 bedroom unit with non family renters would likely have more than 2 cars per unit. The green spaces are great but not for tiring out large breeds. Will there be restrictions on pet ownership in the complex? Stephanie On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:04 AM Ramos, Ricky<rramos(asurfcity-hb.org>wrote: Hi Stephanie—Attached is a site plan and an architectural elevation of the corner building for 680 your info. These are included in the MND document out for public review. The applicant is proposing a two car garage for each unit and 17 open parking spaces for a total of 85 parking spaces for the project. They have 20 more parking spaces than the minimum parking required under state density bonus law. They are proposing common open space in the courtyards between the units. Please let me know if you want to discuss further on the phone. From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Friday, April 8, 2022 2:50 PM To:Stephanie Reid McGinley<stephanie.a.rl@gmail.com> Subject: RE: DMND 21-003 Hi Stephanie—Would you like to talk on the phone about your concerns? If so, when would be a good time to call you to walk you through the plans? J_2 (continue( From: Stephanie Reid McGinley<stephanie.a.r@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 8, 2022 10:58 AM To: Ramos, Ricky<rramos(@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: DMND 21-003 Hello, I am a resident and owner in the Tamarack Village community adjacent to the proposed 34 unit development currently underway at the northwest corner of Talbert and Newland. I have concerns regarding parking in this area. We are already struggling with a shortage of parking in our community, as well as the neighboring single family homes on Jalm and Newland. The street parking is completely full every night and we are having issues with illegal parking in our complex from the neighboring apartment homes. We have also had issues with petty theft from vehicles, as well and mail theft. Having the increase of traffic (vehicle and foot)will no doubt bring more of this to our community. I would like to know how many parking spaces will be included in this new development? 681 Medium density housing tends to have a much higher need for this (2+ spots per unit). Also how much outdoor green space will be available on the proposed property? Having J-2 non-residents walking their pets in our community causes problems with pet waste being (continued left behind, as well as concerns about the safety of our children playing outdoors, and just general community safety and security with increased traffic. Thank for your time. Stephanie 682 Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Planning Application No. 2021-0084 HUNTINGTON BEACH INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter J —Stephanie Reid McGinley Comment J-1 This comment expresses concerns about the Newland Street entrance causing additional traffic and noise on Newland Street.The Traffic Impact Study included a vehicle gap study to determine the number of gaps in the existing stream of traffic to accommodate vehicles entering and exiting the project driveway on Newland Street. Based on the gap analysis, adequate gap in the traffic flow on Newland Street north of Talbert is expected to be available to sufficiently accommodate the right and left turns in and out of the Project Site driveways. Table 14 (IS/MND, Page 125) shows that the Proposed Project's permanent roadway noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the FTA's allowable increase thresholds. Comment J-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Comment J-2 Comment J-2 consists of email exchanges between City staff and the commenter where City staff responded to specific questions related to parking and green spaces. Comment J-2 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 683 2.11 Comment Letter K— Pat Erdelyi From: Pat Erdelyi To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: New zoning at the corner of Newland/Talbert Date: Wednesday,April 20, 2022 11:59:35 AM I live at Tamarack Village and will be impacted by this development. I assumed something would be built there but NO where in this area are there 3 story anything. Changing the K-1 zoning should not happen. More density is NOT a good plan for this area. Turning into the property off of Newland would be a disaster with the left turn lane there!! I am opposed to the zoning changes on every level. Too dense for this area!! Thank you, Patricia M. Erdelyi 17882 Hawes Lane Huntington Beach CA 92647 714-334-5303 Sent from the all new AOL ann for Android 684 Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter K—Pat Erdelyi Comment K-1 Comment K-1 pertains to general opposition to the Proposed Project. Comment K-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 685 2.12 Comment Letter L —Amy Ray From: Amy Ray To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Proposed project on Talbert and Newland Date: Wednesday,April 20,2022 8:37:39 PM To whom it may concern, I ABSOLUTELY THINK THIS IS A TERRIBLE IDEA!! I SAY NO to this project(draft L-1 mitigated negative declaration No. 21-003) WE already have so much noise and traffic and accidents at this corner. PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN!! Thank you. Amy Ray 686 i Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave ' Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Response to Comment Letter L—Amy Ray Comment L-1 Comment L-1 pertains to general opposition to the Proposed Project. Comment L-1 does not identify any deficiencies in the environmental document or identify any significant new information requiring revisions to the IS/MND. Conclusion No new significant information identifying a potentially significant impact or inadequacy in the analysis has been identified. No changes to the IS/MND are required as a result of this comment. 687 Olson Townhomes on Talbert Ave Planning Application No. 2021-0084 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HUNTINGTON BEACH RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 3 Revisions to the IS/MND Subsequent to publication, minor clarifying revisions were made to the Draft IS/MND pertaining to the tree replacement requirement. Biological Resources The text within Section 4.4 (IS/MND, Page 54) has been revised to read: e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less Than Significant: The City's CEQA Compliance memorandum for tree replacement requires the replacement of mature trees on lots that were developed prior to 1973 at a 2:1 ratio (City of Huntington Beach, 2005). For the Proposed Project, adherence to the City's standard would require the Project to plant 64 46, 36-inch box replacement trees+o and additional trees to meet code required landscaping.The Property Owner/Developer would replace the 23 existing mature trees onsite on a 2:1 basis with 46, 36-inch box trees. The Property Owner/Developer would provide 33 additional 36-inch box trees to meet the total code requirement of 79, 36-inch box trees. , } -.11 the nhysieal - GGemmer atinn r.f the n mine} as onviei9 Red i uld 24 r I-Q-3 15 gal„eRtFee,,peF the p1aRtiRg piaR iR-FigwFe 12. The Proposed Project would align with the City's ordinance relative to tree preservation. Therefore, potential impacts associated with biological resources resulting from conflicts with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or the City's tree preservation policy would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. 688 "I J OLSON TOWNHOMES ON TALBERT AVENUE PROJECT ' MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM HUNTINGTON BEACH Project Name: Olson Townhomes on Talbert Avenue (Planning App No. 2021-0084) Project Location: The Proposed Project is located at 8371-8461 Talbert Avenue (APNs 167- 531-23 and -24), at the northwest Corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street (Project Site). The Proposed Project encompasses approximately 2.1 net acres located south of Slater Avenue, west of Newland Street, north of Talbert Avenue, and east of Beach Boulevard in the City of Huntington Beach. Address: 8371-8461 Talbert Avenue CEQA Action: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative was prepared to identify any potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project and incorporate mitigation measures into the Proposed Project as necessary to eliminate the potentially significant effects of the Proposed Project or to reduce the effects to a level of less than significant.) Entitlement Requests: • General Plan Amendment No. 21-002 to amend the General Plan designation from RL (Residential Low Density) to RM (Residential Medium Density); • Zoning Map Amendment No. 21-001 to amend the zoning designation from Low Density Residential to Medium High Density Residential; • Tentative Tract Map No. 19157 to subdivide approximately 2.1 acres for condominium purposes; and • Conditional Use Permit No. 21-004 to develop 34 attached two- and three-story townhomes up to 35 ft. tall in the RM Zone. The CUP is required for a proposed use of 10+ units in the RL or RM zone in accordance with the City's Code 210.04. Project Description: Olson Urban Housing, LLC (Applicant) proposes to redevelop two parcels at the northwest corner of Talbert Ave and Newland Street with a 34-unit, attached townhome complex, ranging from two to three stories, up to 35 feet tall. All units would range from 1,258 square feet to 1,846 square feet and feature attached, two car garages. The existing four structures on two parcels would be demolished. The Applicant is including a 5 percent density bonus by dedicating three of the 34 units for moderate-income sale, and Applicant payment of a 2/10th in-lieu fee. 11 Page 689 ATTACHMENT # 10 W Q a. O L O c U C `" L1 0 vo ao — 0 0 > O 3 > c O >-0 ro L L ° a) c L •v .c 7 cco v- O c a m L +� �' on ` O > o ° a ° LU cu C7 c a) .t v " ° c `�' E ° `� o O is v .0 E rn w _Z f° v t 3 ro V) m o - t `° Ln c c c '3 E o .4 a .� O cc � a>i v +, a) Q) 0- 4- � �' L ° a) ¢ c } aX) +� c Q cc L O o E E ,n t L +' E •0 v c cc E o a a ° �••� C (O a-•' L }, L c0 �+ L a) G L c C W W +� Q) O -O ° N .= Q 3 Q) r0 4- Q) (C m waO v ai ❑. O O F, > -, 0 Z M L = N C OA 4- -O — E m M c �' Ln •— QJ ON Z E N c 3 0 0 0 aL) a ° o ° `° 0 'N c ° L W j a) a) *' °c° E c o C: -0 -0 v o `-^ O on ccv pa) E > c 0 3 ° O +� y Q) c c O H L L ` d O O L 'L O 7 }L, U O c to w L Ln _ ° O ai L Z CL O O -O Q C LnO — Q3) O a) O a o u v 0 L cn L °3 � > fu a) a) u o n ai o CL u Ln S L L c W L bD G ao — Qa •c O o •L " C ac, `L° -0 V U >` o >- o c C7 4� u c a) - LL 4 J M c N 0 > -0 ~ E v o v 0 3 �_ oN c �I v v wo -0 o w L a) + o 1 L C O C — co o +' � L aEi v 3 N co v ° c c 0- co v 0 O fl- c c �, N tin N ar to O o v O ,A n c a) v, o en o a) a) c co .c en a) :a —_ +j N r o L v ns C ,) 4J — > L1 Q) c E on :a c) cv N c L N U -O m co N L +' 0 0 L L � a,, aJ L O QJ mo a) c " a� c c0 4] tB L ° O L 7 ° ° cu oC 4• E co a O ca m a) E L +� E _ 4. 3 m co u a co Cl) Sri L.o ao a N C -O a) L c V fa '6_ 'O '� >• aJ a) c a) a) fD L a) :•� cu N o ,0 C O L O C C C U 4L C aL o O �_ Q C E E L ° O co O V) M Q O 0 ° a Q }' v N 3 Ln a) L c Q) ° o a c E a) E v --a = 4- E 3 a O L M OD L E Q " L f0 .c N 0 L N Q O o m 3 O X c � .0 O E L Q) Q N N >, to Q) N O Q) CO C cp N L •� N b4 0 0 3 o E ° a Li E v E aci �° '� C: u N v -:tf0 > > -0 a) u -0 E a) L v +� tin __ O 0 c a>) w u w w o o ° Q m o Q) Q c 3 3 .c v u N co L +- c ai = _0 0 c� E > ccn .v .° `° a) co of°_o S - c v a co O a) "° a c a c N E - 3 Ln v°'i fl a) fl co •Q m Q- on v L E C a c L Q c a) o E ° N 'n o c u E c c o N — v 3 a 0 3 `° c° c E (u L > aaj a� o - o o c L O a � ~ mo o v E m v E aci ° c c O c c vbn L v a) v > a) c Q v v c c •«- a) 3 0 cc: ° L c al ¢ ate+ ++ 7 E Q. O •E a) L +•' U .� f0 4! o L aci 0 ai C 0 v t9 v u a) •0 0 + — L L., u L O 0 W O- a) 6 d L ° a+ Q) a) on O ° C C Q) L a) .� }' (�6 Q) E -O a) .++ +.' tin o (0 C H -0 'v v f0 o N 'n o L 0 co 4_ 3 '�3 ++ 4, VI C W N j aL-+ C �O c Q) 41 U; .N V U CO Q) _ Ln 'n -0 Vl C O H Q! a1 0 — Q L L L i a•.' E !n C a) 0 L L 3 .c E c 0 0 in o +, L) � u a) f0 L O O L ° c E uaV, != E a) c 0 aaj 4 L v > •c-L° 0 v — °' C: v -o 0 o E L N O z a•, c C o E Q) w Q) L N co C C Z i+ �..' V a) Q) -0 41 L (� i..' Y •L +, O E 7 Q) C ° d L L C cv E .0 O L n3 04 p ra C O O } O > co w C L C v1 V .7 = > L L a) E C cn 'U C Q) O O G 0 3 > Ln w ai c m 'c °) _ > c £ 0 E ° a) 0 a; a) -0 a z c a` w � v ° can Q) -0 3 ac) o cco H E +' ,L, E m .E 4Z Ln 0 a x H E L w ci N M I-- u • Wco 0 a O oc • W p, M W Z Q � F- a • � bn c ago c W W -0 6 Q O • CO CO CO CO H Z O y 6 Z Q • C C C C O C7 hD W E {n Z C C W _ •C i 0 0•� i O H a o 0 a C) 0 = Z Zp — N C C =_ -0 N ai "d "O a) �C N OA = v1 N N N 5 C f6 "a - O O +a) N , to aw -0 LO u C f6 L ,N - a) O -0 p w u E 3 m c co U = 3 m 0 n •� 0 j L L Y � H Z L X _ E N i1 O o O a t 0 - > L a, cV 0 y, 4O o U OL Z O Q) a) U 17 0 I > C a) X n C cu a) C L U In N to O H O Q C -U- O u 00 v N Y p - O �C oD ami `1 -C C p a>i v -0 L 'm ° O 3 m o 0 0 v CU +1 o H 0 c C Q c a c y, v Y to L L C C c. > +� o Ntjo O oA m 0 c L m m U E v O O m N a, m C 41 C C •C N +� Q L }N, 3 N O cu C T E "6 a1 L O 0 ° c ° aNi > v s 3 3 ro c n ° Q v ` ai CL U m _ > cUo a1 � c6 i L cNo y> i -C L E fO a) ai N 7 N +� C Y s a1 N m H 0 m L m ++ _ '- — p '} c Z m f6 a c 3 Ln a `° ay' ' ai a a v y v n `° > m o o a r o m O bD ° a� E — — +� cu v — L "O 0 m -a 0 W m ai m I- m w O au In vi aoi U tiG 1� L C2 - N > L N +.+ U -fl �n C V- 1.., U •� a) M O m '� L N a� ao p a L a) L E a 1- tYo O m N N v v �CU O ++ v ,1N_+ cu >. Q O O m N O E �, "C L 3 0 m O `r C10 d v Y m o oho a T .� '� E E o o v a cn a N v m N 'm $ -0 L t Y a a s v o 'ao E o — v oCD E C = O •1>-_� ' Y v -a 'o —00 0 c Q L C o 3 N m z 0 U a) o N m oD 4+ O O a) +-) m .3 O cu O 3 E 1 m C 0 L co > L C cu to t a1 Y C C N = -0 "O a1 Q L C >• �f C m m m + ,o m oo u o Q N o o E o mo oD °CD 'L 0 m m •Q `L° °' ai o m N m �1 tp 0 v E a1 O tm vYi 'O U -0 w O 'V "=O T U C >� N -a C •M 0- U m m ` m -C Q v — � cu U C m •� O N i C 1-+ Q C to +� v7 i Q 0- CU E m O -0 ++ C m t O t o 1�, G 1m tiD M a� @ E v � v'i m a� a m 7 Y O 0 ZI aj 3 L u .N VI OL u 7 0 CO C 7 L N a) C a1 C Y a) m N ❑_ m m N O 0 L m Q U C N C ..0 aJ ++ C "a (U C ♦- 1 m u C 3 a c v O 'n > m O a) t10 1� m O L 7 — 7 -O 7 O C N a) '> N L ._ W ,N N 0 O U E L U "0 C cu O O Q "O w ,, "a O Y 0 OrD C .a N a1 C i C O fl_ U C O L Q T a1 7 U L N L a1 0 4- _0 a1 O a w Q 0 m U O m Q 3 }� -0 m -0 a L a K U m U) 2 1 4--I m E m E v w aj •- v ° a 4A ° a S O U OD V,.. O U to Q +' C C - +' C C m Lo � m O to LU \ / Z •JJfJ t� � Z • ri _O J m V Ln I* 2 W 0) O C7 crO CL 0 uw p, Z O Lu Z a � CC 0 to °c°0. W W -0 a co cc Q 0 ' CO CO H Z O Z Q C C O E Vf Z c � � i O C 72 G � c0 O (O aj > 0 a in 5 = Z 3~p 0 QCH7 OD O Lm c uO, v wv cL >. -0Lj, Lw cn (n w ~V) LO O L O C a c +, !Eo j ajO UO O =Z L Q L � T . � � -0 � Z O D 4 -YYO Y _ O O yO E O aZ (U aj a) OO 0' v= aj O v v = t 0a) ai 0 -0 a, n m ca� 9 > ti aj OO_ 'O � Ln O � "O Vi t "O u L ; O p pOY 3 p bo on O > _0 U a v c C aj ~ co •� CLmY O O — 4� O_ p aj 'c� aj W U ns `_n n3 +W-� >� co aj U co u cB O O U '3 "O L 'L > L (6 C U 4L.3 L m w aj v -0 v 3 +' o m E v c E — L pc � v o L C Y N c ,N Y U .E ns o oo co .L 0 .N co a) Eb O v > — L _ w V) v an aj o O U L OU Y C a1 +' 7 C L — L aj ti.. -o E O }' u PO .Lnaj m U Y C fO a O bD v u co c c v Q L " U c L � > Y CL tB O Lj Y 0 2 p Y N c aoi Q o_ �_ `—' o v Q u c O Z c aJ Y L u U Y 6 — p O m a, Z v L m v CU Y Y U L v co aj L 0 7 O y v E - +_, L E `L° o o m -d U ^ CJ w a`, E '3 c 3 +' L Yo VI CL U c a) CuY U U ro ,�,� U' CL U s v (V 0 +' _O c c O U v Cp C p N O Y L L O 4- C 7 aj Y L E a� N �' ut 0 C fD Y p Y U O f6 d E a1 � Q Y u .0 ns ) +� aj to 'C U c p � N C m C L L Z +L 0 Q UO O C E O O O 2 -j H C aj V, a, c aj �n °A •� L VI .E c '^ E a u O ra O O v .p O > 7 O 4J ro CL L y v L Y bD ro c c rco io w L p L � E E aj c > O E o o U L E Cu aj > -0 O c v o E g v p +� -0 aj U O aj ,O } O O U OD L C p C (O C +J > W o t O Y M N - •E OO U ], 'C OUO c aj O m c w � C1 U > E rn E � o 7 L Q' aj 7 > L a) ^ -c c a1 Y u = E tND U Y p_ E Y Y U L V) E "6 .Ei C > p L U j v O O N aj aj a1 O J aj L O L m ra -O Y m w in O U -O 2 0 i E L In U E Y t C L L 7 to - Q C + o . > O0 on m 0. P a Z N = J U Cl) W CD Q� Lu a7 O (g = O a � W a Z W Z Qcr0~C nn w a c c W W LU z "a Q • om CO F— Z a Y Z Q • � m Z 0. �n O - ouj ix . 0 ro v ;> OI- aoo = Z Z O — Y N -0 N Ql L W 0 i T N C "O N "O L N — Q) _0 O p aL +� to U H - H 0 a N 0 co 7 a Y Y C L > U Z > �O m a O 6 vi O h O +' U a C .O V C i — C L U 0 (o U C C '— O Z O Q U L U C O U T 0 m O f6 Q T -0 U +-' CU — C- O F— O L u O X O +, U +' Y O N a1 C E N N Q a1 7 C t CU OA p O -0 .a >, O O Y co O N J > O -a U C — - Y Y L Y U _a U O _ N — L Y N L a) c Q) C a) a) w (o W m f0 C Y O > co cu ,v O_ L ~C m O fYo 7 L fo C Q O — Q1 cu C .0 L U N O F— C a1 N N aJ N = N a a1 '+"� a) a c" = Y y N C "O v (a i N Y U Q C a O C C O O L v 3 'oU—n a u u o cu v -C t '� N �_ v o > L v O o p a > co N U I- L 7 O 1- E > ° o U w — o c N °' a -0 v U U m > 7 0 U 3 > ro +, L > a� aJ C Q 7 N O_ p W ` L N O aJ lC6 0 Y -a E N �..' O aJ M L Q N Y a. Y LO O -0 UD im i t]A C co v a) a p `0 N MO - O 0 aJ L _0 - aj v C ,� > LU v O Q O a� O vOi > ; = m E o > O ra a (B Y > O Y Y N � Z N C p N U p 0 p -a L - N O a O � a M N a) Y Q d U -6 T a1 N L N N >. oi cu p - ca O Y Q C (0 t _N �^ p N C i N CU Ll1 L Y C aJ a y CL L a Y 4• � - _ � f0 a Ln p O N> a E � 05L O Q aaJ L L 7 jco v Y U p 41 O ap ❑ d > N C OL L N v ro O C L O fl" a) w = i U O_ L O f0 a1 C 'a Q_ OD C U tiD Q p w _ +� Q cc a O ai v T r y_ Q d Y N Y IM N a1 > L •N C- co > C w �—' p a1 C O ro it N -- N N .� c = ai O N E L v O v - Q aD - C a) a) C_ Ca aN1 M C Yaj -C N 0 O N C U CL c N u YO io O N p a ON c + Ga " ,�, i t — V; fo a1 C L cp Fu Y O .� N Y ,� aJ Q '� p- o "O O_ O O U _N N N fo •N .N o p E 0 C Ql 4- C 4! co 00 bo GA '^ w N a "O "O Y c o a) O }' N p dD i 0 p C Q- �` N a) 1° "a '`^ O 05 ,O co a) 0 -0 Y -O CU L v, 0 ,o o X o Y `o c a, E L a' fO a' > ai Q c v c c a to c a) Y « Q p cu u Y L E Ga •� N Y N N v j v ` a) O a) aa•+1 C - v Q — _ — 2 j 00 n3 co O co o gyp./ M M O C 0 ` cu ._.... Q O_ Y Q U d Q V N fl- Y L L u > a N Y N Q -0 fC aO c L to L 0 Y o cu N c Q L O '3 L Z d .� Q O Z 0 Q ~ ' O_ 'i _ ,0 O W i9 r' t' u o °C a: 0 a O w a Z w Z _0 > — c Q 0~C ro o~c a _c W uj O a) Q 0 • C m F- Z OO \ c +' C Z Q • • w a) O Z ao ,w E c C _ _O G 2 ro - > O �_ a m o 0 = Z 30 c c N v Y a) c w -a -a oo v a) ro a) c pN VQr Q oCU u a, E E— o°D v Z c ° z a on E°° ° f LoZ O L o E p E � o a 0 -0 CD- o -a O Uo C U E ()�a) O QO _ Cl vO C c C O ro C1 U In Y � > C "a � L Q) H c c 'L C C v -O -0 m 0 0 0 .5 O ` °- L C: O d a) m ro c a) N O �' l7 E } o do *' c av < 'Cu) v t) v u C)CL rco `) 3 0 0 Y U C O L L L 0 L X U > .o W C� L O— a Y Y Y •L C a) m C z •" Y ° \ac 3 a) ao ran � E ~ E bo O O O O 0 U C 4.1 E u >• v v •� C 0o r -a _0 •L _ c o > ^ a) c c a E w oz Y i N ra rO `^ bCD f0 •� O GO E O E a ro c ^ E O Co m L .— L c v p L O V1 O YO C ra) L vYi C \ N U C M C L i 0 C U E _ E ._ L ro E O O � t `n O .a — — a) O O Cl O L OO- N O 0 -C YQ > Q) O a) a Y C Y CO C a1 O E L O a) C U a) Y V L > �- a) C a) 7 � + a) a) U M L Y 'O +Y+ aJ C 3 OC Q4J Ya�3l Y4 LO L za Uo C NO UQ, a •- L L •OO VC: U Q E O E C- ) U aL) O Xoo c O y a O a C YO O N o UQU O a C C v to ) a ) 0oo oa c ofl u LNm C2 te O co E Z ooY ai u ' abDa ctE ° a > � a o o YEU v E o a,L - U m E o o Q o o m r» 'a oa m t,O N d rn Q o] U N' O O LLI \ C oll E ro c t ai U CC O LU Y C i5 u N fY_ o a) a L E nnY 0 E z � i d OU mUO u o H �- 2 W 0) 0 a O LU a Z w Z Q � 1= a • W W m G' H Z Z Q • • O (7 cn Z W R 2 O O H = Z Z O ~J Q a `o Vf �V) a° -O a Ls 'Oc L,a>' '+c O O O o C a O o f ` C:O L C a > a a) v OZ _ LO E Ea u O L CL > Y Z > 0 a- >- p O N O Z O °0 Q o � o O cO n E , — M � >. � � U ° C: C) M U c O _0c p ° � Ln p a >. ui a C_ = (O+ L O 3LnL _ U Y i +"� pD m O a O �- 7 Q- Y cn -° ra � co n O E .N N O Q Q `- a c c a c i L Y ,� hD O 7 C M Y u E tti 4 3 a 0 > "a vi co > ,n _ T ° Q N L a s ro m O_ a OD u O L a *' a 7 c L C U a L Y U cD c Y U 3 U Y U U L O O a Y U v a c0 O O H L Q N L i C > } O T O .� c p +, C OD >' Vj c OU "6 OL ° T 7 f6 a E ° C C L a c " cv 3 = d C U - ° L am U m ° L ca Y 3 � O ca c �, Y a T ,� O co n L c a C a m Y U C: b4 U C t Y OA o N a C Q tca C v o C C 0 ~ p a +L a E ° O E ° a N ` E a Y O L 6 Y co i Y U or Vi O a CL o c ^ w 3 co c O E -6 L U aa+ L T "6 U vi C U U i O L O a �„ d O M ° C in Q E = C o co ° ~ m c a` Q iv E cn ru ° ;- a aCL L cu •C •a) c M - U ° C "6 OL a �- a i L c > L O _O U Q V) O Y CL a O Y C L - E 0 Y E U O a s Y } a ° a ao a co to a OLF- O •o U Q C � 7 °U EO � ObD _� *' E E >O U N L O c bD to +a+ m a ` O_ C a "a d ° Y @ Y L U d C +' a � �O -O O 'n •L L � � " h,0 � co E a i L E a W a N -0 a ° E E > a _0 0 m `�° > a C c Q a O L 0 U U C @ U U L 'i c L ++ U Q a Y_ +Y+ Y h OU W C Y L of a to O - F- _ '; a @ "c 7 c a L C L of "� > }, c o v e ° a ° 3 > o -0 m " co -0 cu 3 -a p v ° O ° �? ncu > a o L Y L O m u a U 3 3 ° a ° o c ° v — m C c u O u c g vi ° " E p 0 3 0 > o O o N Q �, c ° C c O Q cn ns > Q i Q O +' O — T U a J Y -6 +-' U rp E Q T y u a O T cu u u i i 7 U O Gp V7 °' U !Yn Y a 41 a > C C > O a O_ h a Vt a C � U �_ C oC E a V, c = cc a p a a C > o o c L a �C- E '� H o P -0 E ¢ Z E rdAo z y o E n a $ a ci W L.L x V z • m 2 0 � � v • z x W_ Q O a7 0 O a 0 • W a D W Z -p Q 0~C (a o~c a c W W a a Q • c Cn Z Q • w v OZ o�nUOE c C _ L O C C � N(9 O _� a m 0 = Z 3 0 a) = t = a T c v L T L = C T 00 (1) C On L Y (0 N c C c O C O O (0 (0 C CJl (0 v 0 C d C) C Y O C V) Y 3 `° `° v `° `° - c E f° � — E o � E '0 0 Z A U u ccv 0 v i s — o t t a a O E v ru o `° v o o E o c rca `°'Ln c +6 Y c YLJ cco J �_ a) i O fti Y N O vUi p U 'p -6 � `�- E L O +, Y O °L C p O p O (U y, a) y H Y On > u +�+ o (n C O t C O U a) O U O (n ,� L �_ C C c p " co 0 = U Y o c v o E +� on C) i C c > G -0 7 L N -p `� C +� y (9 Q f 0 W W ca co ° M v c > Cl. •+' c � u v a"i v 0) M c E v a 0 Y O W L 'y in t L O U OA U L U c (0 •� L °� (C O ) U V) Y U O L •� L Y � C 'p v 4+ ++ M a) w H c W Cl Z p d a) C O Cl) a) C C N �O m i (0 C c O -6 a) a) C 2 (0 = v C a) C .0 "O L > E a) U m (n (n O 'n U '0 � a) O +�.+ (Yp v Y E ° U > > .E °° a`ai f° E E L V) C)) y C -p L O O L O M +� U L L L y_ t0 017 C L Y o C T t a) N N E •C yam., (II C1 � C c L C O N C ate+ C [a ns Y T O •`n LL vi >, N „ -o > o (a Q p y to E (a N \ C) a) ]C U O .p (0 .L O CL (6 -6 (o o +L+ >, 'C U y M L O v a) of c O Q .L L a) L U 00 E (0 E (p (0 OO (a ns o O L •O "O co L Cl p (0 O E N m a) 3 Cn a) 3 a) N y c � \ p L U > v CL �° E aJ E a) L c r- '+� f0 u ~ Cl) E ro U (°°o Z �- c o C �, E L c ,� tss c V) a) `^ U (n L Y '� L o c O a) oz a) O M U t L c am m a) �+ C E > a) O t0 n +� E L N a) E w in O O Ln c 4J C y a) o a1 Ln C E _ o v C 3 O y C U m � O N L (CO T O io o y y a1 4- CU 0 '^ @ �- v � E U U 0 a! N OU E a) E o U E o o U C a) C O a) � i v v Ln M L a) t0 C� o 41 E 3 0 'D a) i °O L 110 'D L H y 'i y U fl- N a -a 0 C2 Cr c ay' �, F- u a) c ra E m cc � nz CD v v v 3 w °1 E o c v o v t " •E c x U w a) a) L 7 Q +� n -C +� (0 Q p O (6 a) C Y CL L O p a) a) O L m >, Y c O E -o a) Y c a) +� 'a U- ,� y •E Opo }' L o y T ~ L Q y L ai 0 'Y C L O �� -0 C (� 4+ L to cu 0 'CL > (co a (moo E � t � P E a v z �' o �' N � � �' � v) tw o f U G T C on L C p O C •o On V U C to 5 0 -0 Ln • C1 (0 C u Z O on oU (0 0. zz_ • z � ' N S � U H F- W 0 a O oc • w a Z C7 uw Z p Qo~C f0 c~c Oa c W W a) Q • C m �.. Z on \ Z Q w C • a1 O 0 _Z oCn on E C L O W C c O Q N fD > O _� a m o 0 Z= _ _ 0 E C O O = s C a1 O W v �J a y r O r C a1 cu -0 `� Y Y a1 C .0 L C O ai 0 -0 L — E C 7 •� F- Z "O �, aJ '� -p vi +, to .0 cu ' cC C c m E L v c > N ca Z O y O ro Y — i O O C o a1 O L Q o o W 0 a; cEo a Q 3 rca L o E v a v O I^ a a� m L c V, E L c V O L 0 v) L cn a) Y m Y v cu r •E > C a1 O ca L O a) L a) �, .3 a tw C- Y O L L u — Y O 4! i O N E Cl) oD aJ C w _ -O C � 3 .Q U L to Ln aJ f0 (6 C w w aJ 0 w E in `o o �° cu > ° L C 0 v E w o �c LO N O in 'o v +, C (O pa (a L U W Y •7 +T+ a1 O C cv Q O o d C cr cu L cro �0 > .� O ` u w O a ' v 0 Lo o 3a vOW co +' O V) `; O > C CN Q dD 40 ` V) Ln C ` Q U - Q LC a1 0 � tin m w Eai E cLE p u 0 �^ ns E c N co a m y 0_ cu C a� - i C O E O c O -0 c Y m > co �—� rco m ai L = cc N ' O O cYo io N f6 E L 0 ai > Ln ,6 E C Y T Y C (a ` 'L > E Y E Y co c o i v E co o c aj v a o L o vi 0 c E u c c v v '6 'Fa m - � E v -a m i s o to m •c cu Y L i u cu -O a VI L Y Y +� f 6 a+i E ro _0 ai �a c v 0 � CU E u Q " 0 L v E L _0 E w 0 L > _0 .� aJ Q Y 0 L 7 u C 0 v 'to �' io OU M �, v N U u m tL +L > o O L r- -0 � y O S E > L O 0 a1 L O �D L O f9 E vi ai O m ai to C 0 C Y — Y L 0 O i cu +-' C o > Ln U Q 0 T Z 'O .L 'C >, 0 'p c m u C u a1 L C Y '� L a1 aJ C L U 7 7 L +� v of cu (O X — > O a1 a1 E -o o -0 u v M u E c E ai '3 O L Cl. 0_ N o �' m a •E ai - 0 0 - v M 0 L -0 v v v v c m E Ln aj O i C > O > 0 Y C `� — Q L C co O N to C Y O a1 m �n " H u 0 0 L c 0 °J E m - 3 N v n as co � •+- �_ E v cu o a o E Q v > v m F- -0 u -0 a F— m on u .E !� u o o co v m F- u w 0 Q co CJ 0 a x z z 0 ` � U i Z ' M S � u F- W • 00 rn oLU 0C a = • W a 0 Z Z Q o~c CL • W W m d' . 0 " • H Z Z Q • • 0 IL N ZLU W F 2 0 0 F = Z Z C0C y w d O `*- -0 0 G c L E •^ �L-- O u p N =3 L � T � a L O L > H Z -0 co H > r L N p 'L Y v) v) (O U > Z 0 a1 } n3 f0 OL O (D v7 O Y U o- U = C U 'vi L -p O O a) O Dom` w co cu T 3 c W v = '+ - o r T L (Q te > a+ ALmca MO w'� O Qto O - 0 V) E ` O• I0v cc= OQ v O aJ W O Ln O Nc > O L76 In L L (a b U O > L Y an Y i H Oa) p C a) � > > 3 v °61.n 'O > cu p c "O O p '� aU ^1O O Ln O cl) to o E v > v) � Q: ao Y Q 3 v a c cu O_ o � -a ° c y_ c _ v a� Ln c c O o o ° cu c n a, L 6 E U a Nc O O c m c �° Ln 41 U f6 Q1 vI f0 7 > L ca "p M a) to L L Y a1 a) 4J C a CU s o M � v 3 Y Y �' a, _ m p_ Y o E L �_ .N O_ "O c aJ v c ai v �' O Z o v E > w@ >' Y a) > 'c a1 L c Q N in H 0 c p C O L n a> > c a1 cn QC UC *' o " Ln O `: oU Lns O O o o E �a O N oU O O_L O a O L3vQ o -a v xs vd Y C +1 >7 O v o n>�s h L > U E on CU N Q p 3 v co y m L 3 a� L o - u p ai o o v o cu c ai a p O c +' aUi W > o L N E L O Oo ai ca cu F- ` O O N O E o. u u � a� ° 14 a E n o VI Y Y L L V1 .� W V7 pU L r• Q) -p c6 -0 m OL pU r- M W LL C7 S U m 0,1 CU .� . . ATTACHMENT # 11 MOTION PASSED C. STAFF ANALYSIS: The staff report for the May 10, 2022 Planning Commission hearing (Attachment No. 4) provides a detailed description and comprehensive analysis of the proposed project including the GPA, ZMA, and MND requests before the City Council as well as the TTM and CUP that were approved by the Planning Commission. In summary, staff recommends approval of the GPA, ZMA, and MND based on the following: - The MND is adequate, complete, and has identified all significant effects of the project and any applicable mitigation measures. - The MND was prepared in compliance with the CEQA Guidelines. - The GPA and ZMA are consistent with the General Plan and its goals and policies. - The GPA and ZMA are compatible with the surrounding area. - The project adds to the City's housing stock, including affordable housing, and RHNA targets. Environmental Status: A MND was prepared for the project (Attachment No. 11) and concludes that no significant impacts are anticipated with implementation of mitigation measures in the areas of biological resources, cultural resources, geology, and tribal cultural resources. The MND was available for a 20-day public review period from March 31 to April 20, 2022. A response to the 12 comment letters received (Attachment No. 9) is attached for City Council review prior to action on the project Strategic Plan Goal: Economic Development & Housing Attachment(s): 1. Suggested Findings for Approval of MND No. 21-003 and ZMA No. 21-001 2. Resolution No. 2022-23 for GPA No. 21-002 3. Ordinance No. 4257 for ZMA No. 21-001 4. May 10, 2022 Planning Commission Staff Report 5. Vicinity Map 6. Project Narrative received and dated April 27, 2022 7. Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning Maps 8. Letters in Opposition/Support 9. Response To Comments Draft MND No. 21-003 10. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11. Draft MND No. 21-003 available at: https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/government/departments/planning/major/major-projects-view.cfm?ID=1111 12. Tentative Tract Map No. 19157 and Site Plan (For Reference Only) 13. PowerPoint Presentation ATTACHMENT # 12 a '^ Pmpeny Addnse Le al Desc,linlon 8371 A375 Talbert Ave- Pin No. HiBeach CA 92647 Asxeeor-167sa12a.RI TTM No 19157 Building Code Summary Occupancy R-3 « .--- Construction Type Type V41 F_ Fire Sprinkler WPA 13D BuimlngType obcrede Number of Stories 2 end 3 J A L M D R I V E - zonnn cunrenlzonm Pro Deed zonnn r :i- - 0 Cuneni Zoning RL-Low penally Reeldentlal RM-Medium Density 1esitlan5al Front Yak Setback 15, 15'(provided) Z Side Yak Setback no less Men 3.no more than 5' 17(pmvdetl) (a6oee2stmkm-3 mer mming25'heiglrt) rya Q Bbaat Bme Yard Seback nn less Man V.no more man 10 15(pmvked) Rear Yak Be%- 10, 73:(provid - �' 10's 3'foresceedr 25 ha'M SMa Summary She Arse W Grass Silo Ares 105,BB9 SF 2.43 AC Z Net Sits Area 89,949 BF 2.07 AC *-25'min.Back Up Space For 90 pwell rg Uws• 34 DO 'Dem ty Bonus 10% - Property cross penny 14.0 MAC Degree Parking(Section 23L18D) \ -Property �. Nelpere 164 DwAc �otco.0y_e s r Mantuan Lot Coverage 50% Parking Space Dimension __ _ Standards(Section 231.14) = - is stack'in a na ta«o Rt , 2t dDamdy e4 dW IDerni Bores 10% .G F b - .w _______ - -�.. :� i AlbweO 35'-0' i i ,/ fory nt a : Proposed k °� � 4�1H 1 �.,_Sight-line Town afthomesPlanSumma 54r IGE& angle,Per P1/P7 4 1,258 3� 11.8% 5.032 GFA {8,984 Standard P2 7 1,58e 3 20.6% 11,102 A 14,581 H�. , M 1,805 4 412% 25.270 29p88 1,848 3 9 PS iK� a .r, w cw � 7 2s4 pp Total 34 100.0% 158,018 168867 T R % o, T. T-100 r -100 - � e T•200 -200 : T-200 _ 3 6edraom Orsb 20 58.8% [ H i M A P1• PUV y .,iA�r vs n A^1^ 4 bedroom Uws 14 41.2% nj, a�i s 1 r--Street corn Total 34 100% 4_ Y 1 4 n » visibility P1 trio Beareom Cosni Is w s xx % - per City atKeroom mW 80 51.1% W Po �� B.•n+P. -t 'x rt::; SR. S E MBE N T '` XY7'` _ A'C _ AIC «: lrp�, 01 Standard 4 bedroom mW 56 48.3%Test lie 100% P tkinukatl Summa ry Front R S aces/unit R . Sight-line Setback R semi 2.0 66 triangle,per City a ,,,, ,�,M^_ -« Guest 0.50 17 "' Total Required Perking 2A Mfi Standard ( T A L e E R T A V E. $treat Side Patios Projections cont Setback (Section 230,68) Pan ng Promaed - apeallkil Sp-Provded Dead End Parkin Maneuvering Garage Spaces - 2.0 eM g 9 Bay Window Projections(B.W.P.)Into Street --Ultimate Right Guest Spaces o47 I6 3'min.(Section 231.18B) Side Yard Setback 2.5'max.(Section 230,68) of Way Acceaable Spam 0.03 1 Tobl Provided Parking 2.60 m O an Space Summary R Sp I'-Patl05 Projections into Street Side Yard +t - Openn Space(25%o1mW not and SF) 14,505 SF 428.E SFAIMT Setback 4'max.(Section 230,68) r f # Open Sp...Mss6nMMinknum Code Dimensions il M S C. LEGEND - Common Open Space(min.10) 0,579 Be 78%P-te Open Specs(ran.6) 2456 SF 22% irin Mast ng Mum Dimensions 11,038 SF 324.6 SFAIMT G- G3S Meters Building# HTOC Near Newland5t.TOS FF Mai ht Dif(erenra E- Electrical Cab. 1 46.46 46.57 0.11 Open Space NOT Meeting Mlnknum Code Dimensions C- Cable/Dale Cab. 2 46.46 46.7 0.24 Pmmie Open Spam(le-Man min 6'Apms Only) I, SF 8.09% AIC- Air Cnnda(1sef Urti[5' ^ = 3 46.46 46.34 _g 4 46.46 45.72 -0.74 12 Otler La,d.rp.Sp-(hm.Manmm.10' ma. 17,V75F 91.91% Tobl0pan 5 ace NOT M- M alnimu Di armlor 1MpM2 SF 5615 SFAJW 5 46.46 4621 -0.19 Tobl of All n Spam Categories 30.127 SF 6 46.46 46.54 0.08 BriHirg Gonna 31,317 SF 34B2% % - - 8 46.46 45.96 -0.6 LerdecepeMaAacape Coverage 30.127 SF 3349% 46.46 1 45.11 -L35 Architecture+Planning 7911Yon Korman Ave 0 SITE PLAN A 1 .0 Suie211 M10OldnComparry HUNTINGTON BEACH-NEWLAND AND TALBERT PI°'Data: a.11.21nz 1 I I I Irm s.CA 92614 : 3010 Old Ranch Parkway,Suite 100 HUNTINGTON BEECH,CA #2020-0732 4M Planning Submitbl: 02.02.2022 a 5 ss es S �85�1.2133 Seal Beach.CA 90704 �� TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19157 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SITE Bflxc, ovu.oE,s,A,E of cusw,AA As 51aMN W,YA➢BEtcFCEo Ix Boa'A2 vAc4 s.a vuim NAPS.REca+os Df SAro ccVxtt � �—r 11I � I i I 1 Fi i � w G r _ _ w zz I i 'S PROPOSED PARCEL lu I r . TALBERT AVENUE EXUTM FAQ (86iAL NOTES LEGAL OEBCRPIgN SRATE.BRi OF OW18♦BIiR oE. E s�exBBMs�� Mro�x_ �.n r x a� o B M a��� wa. � ae., wnn,rzrz�.�..wKw .w�o DEOEAPEIA .uam. a ,. w.� —.w�a .aw�K m"maa�e� CA— RX �n x, O .uxoEBex «B U-1 vAUi, 0 w®:.. .cm:mm rcmmi :n..min m:rze..wmaa.wwB o.x.vx. PARED BY: Y „ OA ew:.r..u.mw mrm.m: PROPERTY ADDREM V••—" ,a� © B ADVANCED EX Rmopr` _— ABBE>�OR PARCH MA.BEd B E c.x.cx ux. rce: _�. Ex wArE B UxE `C �aoa w.aa EX M—AD aE DENB'fY'CALCU.A7101S c AwB rnw nmosm owx,. :e:wi.c m.r w,s n ro..,,o * EBIMA�O ENRMYOTK OUANIRF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19157 Oi w w N we FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES scut.,'-30' Cif 4 GF 1 ATTACHMENT # 13 U TIN G T RPORArFo Olson Town homes .1 751,E 1 --- - --- - - - - _ City Council 41T June 7, 2022 t. OUNT� 701 V�l Project Request General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21 -002 - To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM ) F RM RM 0 io AW ri RL RL No G 7-0� �� # RM O` \N�ORPORATFO YL - L L Y RL _ 17, ISO Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan cUUNTY Project Request Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 21 -001 - To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM ) Ps RM-12 RM t 3 I r RL n M RM \N�QPPORATF� �V 167-53123 �`--- V �i� iCn wRL Y� Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning (•UUNTY Project Request Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21 -003 — To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project u,v n tt<,t.. ��0 l N G T ENHANCED RIGHT AIM Qij� \�rpRPORArFo .. �.. T T �a � . MIAMI NTY ' Project Request May 10, 2022 Planning q Commission approved (no x appeal): V gag -Property �eyytaaAMt7ng(Sixtinn231 6D) Lino Patlarg space bimeirmim 21Y min-d'Stanc t $ttYra7aMsCSeclip'i 23f 44) ' _�_--_ _z_____ for vallote sa AL Tentative Tract Map 19157 — To k � � INN I..Sighhfine subdivide 2.07 acres for ' � ' `"a�'erC � �,�, ,,.w �> �F _ i standard condominium purposes i s � vismerry tnangM per City IdE H F .•. ••- i ! $tandSftt Conditional Use Permit 21 -004 '� � 4.-- - - - ------ WineFront Mangle.Par Cray Setback m7 rr - - To develop 34 tow n h o m e s and Standard i a t 6 E R T AVE. street Side x°Patios Projec8ona co Dead Eml Pal" Ang, �I..9a WkWaw � setback (section 230.68) allow up to an 8 ft. tall retaining 3 (Section231168) si�YardSe 26me.W +n°�6 _ofWay , wall topped with a 6 ft. tall wall Patios PrpJd. ns into street sidey Setback 4`max(6ectkftt 2M 68) at west property line MISC LEGEND 17. c�I/'Awl TY Analysis ■ MND adequate and complete ■ Consistent with General Plan and its goals and policies ■ Compatible with the area ■ Adds to the City's housing stock, including affordable housing, and RH NA targets NTIN6 O` \N�ORPORATF ��UNTY Z Recommendation Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the request based on the reasons cited % I NGTO v� FF6 17,190, CpIUJNT`( ' %flNG T �,oRPORgrF� CQ End - - _ 'z � FB, �� �9 , P• Qi � 19 OUN vT 1 709 �m� � 3�rg12a2� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following Planning and Zoning items: ❑ 1. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 22-003 (7-11 GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE) Applicant: Julie Morris, 2521 Fairmount Street, Dallas, TX 75201 Appellant: AF-GHBM. LLC, 2521 Fairmount Street, Dallas, TX 75201 Request: To remove Condition of Approval No. 6(b) of Conditional Use Permit No. 19-014 requiring all existing overhead utilities along the property's westerly property line to be undergrounded. The Planning Commission held a public hearing of EPA No. 22-003 on April 26, 2022 and denied the request. Location: 16171 Beach Boulevard, 92647 (southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Stark Drive) City Contact: Tess Nguyen, Associate Planner 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 21-002/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (ZMA) NO. 21-001/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) NO. 21-003 (OLSON TOWNHOMES) Applicant: Ben R. Johnson, The Olson Company Property Owner: Mary Langston Request: GPA: To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) ZMA: To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) MND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these applications on May 10, 2022 and recommended approval to the City Council. Location: 8371-8461 Talbert Avenue, 92647 (northwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street) CitV Contact: Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines because there is no potential that the removal of the subject condition of approval will have a significant effect on the environment. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the initial environmental assessment for Item #2 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item #2, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following Planning and Zoning items: ❑ 1. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 22-003 (7-11 GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE) Applicant: Julie Morris, 2521 Fairmount Street, Dallas, TX 75201 Appellant: AF-GHBM. LLC, 2521 Fairmount Street, Dallas, TX 75201 Request: To remove Condition of Approval No. 6(b) of Conditional Use Permit No. 19-014 requiring all existing overhead utilities along the property's westerly property line to be undergrounded. The Planning Commission held a public hearing of EPA No. 22-003 on April 26, 2022 and denied the request. Location: 16171 Beach Boulevard, 92647 (southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Stark Drive) City Contact: Tess Nguyen, Associate Planner ® 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 21-002/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT (ZMA) NO. 21-001/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND) NO. 21-003 (OLSON TOWNHOMES) Applicant: Ben R. Johnson, The Olson Company Property Owner: Mary Langston Request: GPA: To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) ZMA: To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) MND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these applications on May 10, 2022 and recommended approval to the City Council. Location: 8371-8461 Talbert Avenue, 92647 (northwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street) City Contact: Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines because there is no potential that the removal of the subject condition of approval will have a significant effect on the environment. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the initial environmental assessment for Item #2 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item #2, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office or online at http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov on Thursday, June 2, 2022. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Robin Estanislau, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office or online at http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov on Thursday, June 2, 2022. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Robin Estanislau, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ Moore, Tania From: Christine Gonzalez <cgonzales@scng.com> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 10:49 AM To: Moore,Tania Cc: Switzer, Donna; Esparza, Patty; Estanislau, Robin; De Coite, Kim Subject: Re: PH Notice - EPA 22-003 (7-11) GPA 21-002 MND 21-003 (Olson) Attachments: 11537548.pdf Cost $540.64, pub HB Wave 5/26 PLEASE NOTE Community Paper Memorial Day Deadlines Publication Thursday June 2,2022 Submission Deadline 3pm, Wednesday May 25. Approvals and changes loam, Thursday May 26. OC Register Legal Advertising Sales Coordinator Chrissy Gonzalez 1771 S. Lewis St. Anaheim, CA 92805 714-796-6736 M-F 8:00 a.m. -4:30 p.m. Lunch 12 Noon to 1:00 p.m. Closed Sat. and Sun On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:36 AM Moore, Tania<Tania.Mooregsurfcity-hb.org>wrote: Good morning Chrissy, Please publish the attached notice in The Wave on 5/26. Thank you, i Tania Moore, CIVIC Senior Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office 714-536-5209 tania.moore(a)-surfcity-hb.org 2 HEA BEF RE THE ITY UN IL F THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday,June 7,2022,at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following Planning and Zoning items: %1. ' ulie Morris, 2521 Fairmount Street, Dallas, TX 75201 Appellant: AF-GHBM. LLC, 2521 Fairmount Street, Dallas, TX 75201 Request: To remove Condition of Approval No. 6(b) of Conditional Use Permit No. 19-014 requiring all existing overhead utilities along the property's westerly property line to be undergrounded. The Planning Commission held a public hearing of EPA No. 22-003 on April 26, 2022 and denied the request. LocaiLQn 16171 Beach Boulevard, 92647 (southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Stark Drive) City Contact:Tess Nguyen,Associate Planner %2. - 70NI- Ben R. Johnson, The Olson Company El Request: GPA: To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) ZMA: To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) MND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these applications on May 10,2022 and recommended approval to the City Council. Location: 8371-8461 Talbert Avenue, 92647 (northwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street) City Contact: Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines because there is no potential that the removal of the subject condition of approval will have a significant effect on the environment. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the initial environmental assessment for Item#2 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item #2,with mitigation,would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Mitigated Negative Declaration No.21-003 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department,2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office or online at http:/,www.huntingtonbeachca.aov on Thursday,June 2,2022. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If You challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues You or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,or in written correspondence delivered to the City at,or prior to,the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Robin Estanislau,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 714-536-5227 htto://hunti ngtonbeachca.goy/H BPubl icComments/ Published Huntington Beach Wave May 26,2022 11537548 PROOF OF SERVICE OF PAPERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.6, on May 26, 2022, I served the foregoing documents described as: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21-002/Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 21-001/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) No. 21-003 (Olson Townhomes) on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: 398 Addresses — see label list a. [X] BY MAIL -- I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Huntington Beach, California. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business, with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am aware that, on motion of a party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than 1 day after date of deposit for mailing in the affidavit. b. [ ] BY MAIL -- By depositing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail at Huntington Beach, California, addressed to the address shown above. c. [ ] BY DELIVERY BY HAND to the office of the addressee. d. [ ] BY PERSONAL DELIVERY to the person(s) named above. e. [ ] BY FAX TRANSMISSION to No. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 26 2022, at Huntington Beach, California. et Senior Deputy City Clerk g1followup/letters/proof of mailing.doc AVE • • Easy Peel • • to 1 I 1 2 Olson Townhomes Project HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc.of Realtors Standard Planning Mailing List President Dave Stefanides 16787 Beach Blvd.Ste 202 255521_a Paz Road Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Laguna Hills,CA 92653 5 Huntington Beach Tomorrow President PO Box 865 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 7 SCAG Richard Spicer 818 West 7th, 12th Floor Los-Angeles, CA 90017 aN�F�4OFFIC€: g , ETI:Corral 100 t , l'B Jean Kimbrell,Treasurer Envtro naaardx P.O.Box 2298 Catheiritne e Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Fjpa� yc ,S;'�c'E� �t:.r, .ti�.b.'�r•eXi` Y �°;rvY,. •.<v'� 4�....::,s�_ 13 Newland House Museum Pres., H.B. Historical Society 19820 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92648 14 Historic Resources Board Chair Kathie Schey 3612 Rebel Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92649 17 Krsten Berg 18870 Kithira Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92648 19 19 O.C.Ping.&Dev.Services Dept. O.C.Planning&Develop.Dept. Director- Michael Balsamo P.O.Box 4048 P.O.Box 4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 20 21 22 City of Costa Mesa City of Fountain Valley City of Newport Beach Planning Director Planning Director Planning Director P.O. Box 1200 10200 Slater Ave. P.O.Box 1768 Costa Mesa, CA 92628-1200 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Newport Beach,CA 92663-8915 23 24 City of Westminster City of Seal Beach Planning Director Planning Director 8200 Westminster Blvd. 211 Eighth St. R Westminster,CA CA 92683 Seal Beach,CA 90740 . . 26 Department of Transportation,Dist.12 Maureen El Harake,Branch Chief 1750 E 4t'Street#100 Santa Ana,CA 92705 28 29 29 Huntington Beach Post Office Fountain Valley Elem.School Dist. Fountain Valley Elem.School Dist. N Rina Lucchese,Executive Assistant New Growth Coordinator Marc Ecker 10055 Slater Avenue 6771 Warner Ave. 10055 Slater Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 30 30 31 HB City Elementary School Dist. HB City Elementary School Dist. Ocean View School District Gregg Haulk, Superintendent John Archiald Attn:Cindy Pulfer,Admin.Services 17011 Beach Blvd,Ste 560 17011 Beach Blvd,Ste 560 17200 Pinehurst Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647. Huntington Beach,CA 92647 31 32 32 Dr.Michael Conroy,Ed.D Westminster School District Westminster School District Deputy Superintnedent,Administrative Services Tony Wold Marian Kim Phelps,Superintendent Ocean View School District 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 14121 Cedarwood Avenue- 17200 Pinehurst.Lane Westminster,CA 92683 Westminster,CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 33 33 HB Union High School District HB Union High School District Stephen Ritter Greg Plutko,Superintendent 5832-Bolsa Avenue 5832 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 46 46 315 San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians OC County Harbors,-Beach&Parks Dept. Anthony Morales,Chief Anthony Morales,Chief P.O.Box 4048 PO Box 693 PO Box 693 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 San Gabriel,CA 91778 San Gabriel,CA 91778 46 46 49 Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Andrew Salas,Chairman Coastkeepers Joseph Ontiveros,Cult.Res.Director Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation Gary Brown PO Bos 487 PO Box 393 3151 Airway Ave.Suite F-110 San Jacinto,CA 92581 Covina, CA 91723 Costa Mesa,CA 92663 54 57 40 Third Party Environmental Review Kathleen Belohovek Hearthside Homes Southern California Edison Company 9101 Five Harbors Dr. 27285 Las Rambias,Suite 210 2244 Walnut Grove Ave,GO-1,Quad 2C Huntington Beach,CA.92646 Mission Viejo,CA 92691 Rosemead,CA 91770 62 60 Randy Coe,CCIM Paula Leonard Senior Vice President 4951 Hilo Circle Land Advisors Organization Huntington Beach,CA 92647 100 Spectrum Drive,Suite 1400 Irvine, CA 92618 GPA 1 -ooZ 7 VV0 09 L8/09 L5® AJGAV oane aigifedwoo ww G9 x ww 9Z panof op a-4anoij3 0���� �l�� 09L8/09LS®tiaAVgjinn aigijedwoo„8/9 Z x„i.azis lagei 112-781-73 112-783-01 112-783-02 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT BREESE ALLAN 8572 TALBERT AVE 18067 COURREGES CT 18071 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5544 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 112-783-03 112-783-06 112-783-07 HALL REVOCABLE TRUST RABAT RAJA CHRISTOFFELS FRANK E TR 18075 COURREGES CT 18076 COURREGES CT 18072 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 112-783-08 112-783-09 112-783-10 OCCUPANT YOUNG KATHLEEN TR 2012 TR OCCUPANT 18068 COURREGES CT 18067 METCALF LN 18071 METCALF LN FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5539 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5539 112-783-28 112-783-29 112-783-30 DEBELLA CHRISTOPHER OCCUPANT FREDERISY KRIS KISHI 8571 SHADOW LN 8567 SHADOW LN 8563 SHADOW LN FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5541 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5541 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5541 112-783-31 112-783-32 112-783-33 OCCUPANT YAMASAKI CAROLYN T BUCHHOLZ JESSICA 8559 SHADOW LN 18048 COURREGES CT 18044 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5541 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5523 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5523 112-783-34 112-783-35 112-783-40 LIM RITA AYWAZIAN YERAN FULLERTON JAMES RICHARD 18040 COURREGES CT 18036 COURREGES CT 8533 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5523 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5523 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 112-783-41 112-783-42 112-783-43 ZOLTAN ADRIANA A HAYBER KENNETH D COTOCIU MIHAI 8529 COURREGES CT 8525 COURREGES CT 18035 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 112-783-44 112-783-45 112-783-46 HO KENNY SHIROMA SCOTT LY BINH 18039 COURREGES CT 18043 COURREGES CT 18047 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 112-783-50 112-783-51 112-783-52 TRACY NGUYEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST OCCUPANT WALTER DANIEL C 18079 COURREGES CT 18080 COURREGES CT 8549 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5519 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5523 112-783-53 112-783-54 112-783-55 TOURGEMAN EDWARD SALERNO DEBRA ANN TR D A SALERNO OCCUPANT 854S COURREGES CT REVOC TR 8537 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 8541 COURREGES CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5542 / STAPEESO Etiquette do format 25 mmx'67 mpm compatible e a 05160/8160 C, � 04A V170 09 LS/09 L9® tiaAV oane aignedwoo ww L9 x ww SZ 1ewjof op a}}anba3 �5�����V 09 L8/09 L9®/UaAV gtlnn algltedwoo„8/9 Z x,,L azis iagei 157-381-03 157-381-04 157-381-05 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT GARZO VITALINO 8262 TALBERT AVE 8272 TALBERT AVE 8282 TALBERT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1545 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1545 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-1545 157-381-06 157-381-07 157-381-08 OCCUPANT CALDERON MAURICIO SILVER NICHOLAS BARRY 8302 TALBERT AVE 8312 TALBERT AVE 8322 TALBERT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1545 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1545 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1545 157-381-09 157-381-10 157-381-11 CISNEROS MARTIN TURNER LIVING TRUST RATHBUN RONALD A 8321 GLADYS DR 8311 GLADYS DR 8301 GLADYS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1502 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1502 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1502. 157-381-12 157-381-13 157-382-07 NGUYEN CHRISTOPHER T OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8281 GLADYS DR 8271 GLADYS DR 8302 GLADYS DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1502 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1502 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1503 157-382-08 157-382-09 157-383-04 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT LE LINH V 8312 GLADYS DR 8322 GLADYS DR 18092 HARTLUND LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1503 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1510 157-383-05 157-383-06 157-383-07 CURTIN JUSTIN MATHEW TRAN DOUGLAS ESPARZA MARIO 18072 HARTLUND LN 18062 HARTLUND LN 18052 HARTLUND LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1510 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1510 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1510 157-383-08 157-383-09 157-383-10 OCCUPANT TRAN AN MANH TR A M TRAN &A T VINCENT CHRISTINE 18032 HARTLUND LN NGUYEN REVOC TR 18002 HARTLUND LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1510 18022 HARTLUND LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1510 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-1510 157-383-11 157-383-12 157-383-13 OCCUPANT COURREGES RONALD LAWRENCE TR NIENDORF WILLIAM L 18001 GULF LN 18011 GULF LN 18021 GULF LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 157-383-14 157-383-15 157-383-16 BORKENHAGEN ANN TR THE OCCUPANT BARTMAN CYNTHIA JEAN BORKENHAGEN FAMILY TR 18041 GULF LN 18061 GULF LN 18031 GULF LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 157-383-17 157-383-18 157-384-05 BEVINGTON CASEY HILL TR SHELDEN RYAN TILLMANNS AARON 18071 GULF LN 18081 GULF LN 8452 SANTANA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1610 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-1634 STAKE ® label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 S Etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 04A ` V0 09 L9/09Lg® /aaAV pane alggedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ 1ewjof op a}tano113 G������� 09 L8/09 Lg®tiaAV gflnn alglfedwoa„g/g Z x,,L azls lagel 157-384-06 157-384-07 157-384-08 KIRCH TERRY TR SIANEZ STEVEN ANTHONY KNOTT JOSEPH L 8441 SANTANA CIR 8421 SANTANA CIR 8411 SANTANA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1634 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1634 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-1634 157-384-09 157-384-10 157-384-11 PACHECO MARTHA CALDERON PRONIER LESLIE JANE BISNAR EUNICE 1 8401 SANTANA CIR 8402 TRADEWIND CIR 8412 TRADEWIND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1634 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 157-384-12 157-384-13 157-384-14 COSBY DUANE E TR MANANDIK RASHELL A KHALIL HANY 8422 TRADEWIND CIR 8442 TRADEWIND CIR 8452 TRADEWIND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-1642 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 157-384-15 157-384-16 157-384-17 OCONNOR JEFFREY M CHAPMAN GW CALDERON LOUIS TR 8441 TRADEWIND CIR 8421 TRADEWIND CIR 8411 TRADEWIND CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 157-384-18 157-384-19 157-384-20 KUNZE MANFRED K TR HESSER AMANDA BAHRAMI GHAZALEH 8401 TRADEWIND CIR 8402 TALBERT AVE 8412 TALBERT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1642 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1641 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1641 157-384-21 157-384-22 157-384-23 OCCUPANT COURTEMARCHE LISA LAI BILLY D 8422 TALBERT AVE 8442 TALBERT AVE 8452 TALBERT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1641 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1641 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1641 157-384-24 157-384-25 157-384-26 NGUYEN TRANG VU XUAN CAUSER EDWARD 0 TR CONNOR LILLIAN E 18001 NEWLAND ST 18011 NEWLAND ST 18321 NEWLAND ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1623 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1623 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 157-384-27 157-384-28 157-384-29 GUZMAN MICHAEL R MCKNEE VALERIE T CORDY ROBERT 18031 NEWLAND ST 18041 NEWLAND ST 18061 NEWLAND ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1623 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1623 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1623 157-384-30 157-384-31 167-531-02 TORRES JOSE ANTONIO ATHEY BRETT A OCCUPANT 18071 NEWLAND ST 18081 NEWLAND ST 17801 NEWLAND ST A HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1623 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1623 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7053 167-531-13 167-531-14 167-531-15 BOLSTER LANNY B HAM DAN SAMIR A TR OCCUPANT 8492 JALM DR 8482 JALM DR 8462 JALM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 o label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery®5160/8160 ���✓� A / —Lj 03\STAPLES 1 Etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 1,— 7— �Gi�✓ � 04A vb0 09[2/0915® tiany oane alqudwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z juuol op aganbll3 ��-JdV JLS 0918/091S®/uanV qj!m 9Iq!judwoo„g/g Z x,,G azls lagel O 167-531-16 167-531-17 167-531-18 HOANG MINH CONG TOMISTAJEREMY MURATALLAJUAN 8452 JALM DR 8442 JALM DR 8432 JALM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 167-531-19 167-531-20 167-531-21 OCCUPANT ZEMAN VOJTECH TR COOPER MARK SCOTT TR 8422 JALM DR 8412 JALM DR 8402 JALM DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7047 167-531-22 167-531-23 167-531-24 DECK BARRET OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8392 JALM DR 8375 TALBERT AVE 8371 TALBERT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7015 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1546 167-593-06 167-593-07 167-593-08 DOMINGO RAYMUNDO I WANG SHI YEE TR CHAUV MAN 8550 ROCK FISH CIR 8540 ROCK FISH CIR 8532 ROCK FISH CIR FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5006 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5006 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5006 167-593-09 167-593-10 167-594-05 VU JOSEPH THONG OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8524 ROCK FISH CIR 8514 ROCK FISH CIR 8567 CAPE COD AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5006 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5006 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 167-594-06 167-594-07 167-594-08 LORENZ JUAN R BUI VINCENT PEREZ OSVALDO V TR PEREZ LIVING TR 8557 CAPE COD AVE 8547 CAPE COD AVE 2018 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 8537 CAPE COD AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 167-594-09 167-594-10 167-594-11 DO KIEN TRONG NGUYEN BIEN V DO THIEN TR FAMILY REVOCABLE TR 8527 CAPE COD AVE 8517 CAPE COD AVE 8507 CAPE COD AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 167-594-12 167-594-13 167-594-14 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT C2D2TRUST 8501 CAPE COD AVE 17883 POINT REYES ST 17903 POINT REYES ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5018 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5004 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5005 167-594-15 167-594-16 167-594-17 HUYNH LAM TRUC OCCUPANT VO HANH NHU 17913 POINT REYES ST 17923 POINT REYES ST 17943 POINT REYES ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5005 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5005 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5005 167-594-18 167-594-19 167-594-20 PHAM JACKLYN MINH TR CHA JUNG Y RAY AMY 17953 POINT REYES ST 17963 POINT REYES ST 8502 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5005 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5005 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 o label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 6/ 1� / STAPLES etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 4 7 04A V170 09 t8/0919® (JaAV Dane aigl}edwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z tewaof op a:Panb1t3 ������ 0918/0919®tiaAV qj!M algljedwoo„g/9 Z x„I.azis Iagel o 167-594-21 167-594-22 167-594-23 DINH JEFFREY OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8508 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE 8518 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE 8528 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 167-594-24 167-594-25 167-594-26 KOUYOUMJIAN CAROLINE TR TANG NHU NGOC QUYNH HOANG KIM DUYEN T 8538 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE 8548 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE 8558 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 167-594-39 167-594-40 167-594-41 NGUYEN TUONG HUU PHAM DUC QUANG NGUYEN RICHARD TR THE R NGUYEN &H 17913 POINT SUR ST 17923 POINT SUR ST VY FAMILY LIVING TR FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5025 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5025 17931 POINT SUR ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5025 167-594-42 167-594-43 167-594-44 BLACK TREVOR W SALAMA NIVA BEARDSLEY HOLLY M 17930 POINT LOMA ST 17922 POINT LOMA ST 17912 POINT LOMA ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5043 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5043 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5043 167-594-45 167-594-46 167-594-47 NGUYEN VAN-DZUNG V TR OCCUPANT PHAM DUC D TR 17904 POINT LOMA ST 17901 POINT LOMA ST 17911 POINT LOMA ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5043 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5044 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5044 167-594-48 167-594-49 167-594-50 CORTEZ WILLIAM N TR ABRAHAM REGINALD GM TR R GM WEBB FRED G 17921 POINT LOMA ST ABRAHAM REVOC LIVING TR 17943 POINT LOMA ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5044 17929 POINT LOMA ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5044 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5044 167-594-51 167-594-52 167-594-53 NGUYEN JOSEPH TIEN TRAN DEBBIE MY OCCUPANT 17953 POINT LOMA ST 17963 POINT LOMA ST 17962 POINT REYES ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5044 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5044 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5047 167-594-54 167-594-55 167-594-56 TRAN JIMMY BINH PHI PROWSE KRISTOPHER OCCUPANT 17952 POINT REYES ST 17942 POINT REYES ST 17928 POINT REYES ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5047 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5047 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5047 167-594-57 167-594-58 167-594-59 NGUYEN TU KIM TGIA INVESTMENT LP OCCUPANT 17920 POINT REYES ST 17910 POINT REYES ST 17902 POINT REYES ST FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5047 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5047 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5047 167-601-18 167-601-21 167-601-22 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8345 TALBERT AVE 17952 BEACH BLVD 17952 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1546 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 / Avery STAKES Etiquette do format 25 mmx'67 compatible with lmpat b e a 05160/8160 � �j��/��C�_3� 04A `d170 0919/0919® AJaAV oane apledwoo ww L9 x ww SZ}ewaot op a}}anblt3 ������� 09l.8/0919®tiaAV qj!M algltedwoo„8/9 Z x,,I.azls lagel 933-130-01 933-130-02 933-130-03 OCCUPANT JOHNSTON JUDITH OCCUPANT 17902 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#1 17892 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#2 17888 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#3 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 933-130-04 933-130-05 933-130-06 OCCUPANT SHELLEY KEITH WILLIAM BUCHANAN BRANDON 17886 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#4 17884 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#5 17882 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#6 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 933-130-07 933-130-08 933-130-09 LAPOINTE STEPHANIE M OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17876 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#7 17872 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#8 17862 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#9 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 933-130-10 933-130-11 933-130-12 BURKHARDT MICHAEL OCCUPANT ALVO JACLYN 17861 MAGGIE LN, UNIT# 10 17871 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#11 17875 MAGGIE LN, UNIT# 12 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7019 933-130-13 933-130-14 933-130-15 OCCUPANT BERKE BRIGITTE OCCUPANT 17881 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#13 17901 MAGGIE LN, UNIT# 14 17899 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#15 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 933-130-16 933-130-17 933-130-18 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT TOPHAM DEBRA K W 17897 MAGGIE LN, UNIT# 16 17895 MAGGIE LN, UNIT# 17 17893 MAGGIE LN, UNIT# 18 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 933-130-19 933-130-20 933-130-21 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17891 MAGGIE LN, UNIT# 19 17889 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#20 17887 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#21 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 933-130-22 933-130-23 933-130-24 STALLINGS LAUREN Y BONILLAS HAILEY OCCUPANT 17885 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#22 17883 MAGGIE LN, UNIT#23 17912 HAWES LN, UNIT#24 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 933-130-25 933-130-26 933-130-27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17902 HAWES LN, UNIT#25 17892 HAWES LN, UNIT#26 17888 HAWES LN, UNIT#27 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 933-130-28 933-130-29 933-130-30 OCCUPANT ERDELYI PATRICIA M OCCUPANT 17886 HAWES LN, UNIT# 28 17882 HAWES LN, UNIT#29 17880 HAWES LN, UNIT#30 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 ® label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery @5160/8160 STAPLES Etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 K6 — 7 — 04A V170 0919/0919® AJaAV Dane alggi3dwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z jewaoj op a}}anbit3 �3-J VIS 0918/0919®faaAV qj!M algl}edwoo„8/9 Z x„G azis lagal G 933-130-31 933-130-32 933-130-33 OCCUPANT MIALI CARLA TERESE MCGINLEY KEITH P 17876 HAWES LN, UNIT#31 17874 HAWES LN, UNIT#32 17872 HAWES LN, UNIT#33 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 933-130-34 933-130-35 933-130-36 AIZAWA SHINTA OCCUPANT PROTSENKO IRINA 17885 HAWES LN, UNIT#34 17887 HAWES LN, UNIT# 35 17891 HAWES LN, UNIT#36 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 933-130-37 933-130-38 933-130-39 CHERCHIAN ROGER E OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17901 HAWES LN, UNIT#37 17911 HAWES LN, UNIT#38 17888 POLLARD LN, UNIT#39 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-40 933-130-41 933-130-42 BRANNON MATHEW THOMAS OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17886 POLLARD LN, UNIT#40 17884 POLLARD LN, UNIT#41 17882 POLLARD LN, UNIT#42 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-43 933-130-44 933-130-45 BENEDICTJENNIFER LEE TR KWON GRACE LOWRY CHARLES 17880 POLLARD LN, UNIT#43 17876 POLLARD LN, UNIT#44 17874 POLLARD LN, UNIT#45 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-46 933-130-47 933-130-48 APPELL CHARLES JOHANN OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17872 POLLARD LN, UNIT#46 17870 POLLARD LN, UNIT#47 17890 POLLARD LN, UNIT#48 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-49 933-130-50 933-130-51 MORALES-ARNAO CESAR G FENTON FAMILY TRUST OCCUPANT 17892 POLLARD LN, UNIT#49 17902 POLLARD LN, UNIT#50 17912 POLLARD LN, UNIT#51 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-52 933-130-53 933-130-54 OCCUPANT RALSTON TRAVIS OCCUPANT 17915 POLLARD LN, UNIT#52 17911 POLLARD LN, UNIT#53 17901 POLLARD LN, UNIT#54 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-55 933-130-56 933-130-57 OCCUPANT JENNINGS [AN READ OCCUPANT 17891 POLLARD LN, UNIT#55 17887 POLLARD LN, UNIT#56 17885 POLLARD LN, UNIT#57 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-58 933-130-59 933-130-60 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT MESSINA CHRISTOPHER N 17883 POLLARD LN, UNIT#58 17881 POLLARD LN, UNIT#59 17875 POLLARD LN, UNIT#60 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 STAPLES etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 04A VV0 09 L8/09 L9® Aaany Dane alggedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewaol op allanbill oS�����5 09 L8/09 L9®tiany g}Inn alglledwoo„8/g Z x,,L azls lagel 933-130-61 933-130-62 933-130-63 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT DANNA DEBRA 17873 POLLARD LN, UNIT#61 17837 BEARD LN UNIT,#62 17835 BEARD LN UNIT,#63 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-64 933-130-65 933-130-66 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT DOMNGERN ANDREW PHILLIP 17831 BEARD LN UNIT,#64 17825 BEARD LN UNIT,#65 17821 BEARD LN UNIT,#66 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-67 933-130-68 933-130-69 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT BURDETTE MICHELE 17817 BEARD LN UNIT,#67 17815 BEARD LN UNIT,#68 17811 BEARD LN UNIT,#69 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7001 933-130-70 933-130-71 933-130-72 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17801 BEARD LN UNIT, #70 17802 BEARD LN UNIT,#71 17812 BEARD LN UNIT,#72 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-73 933-130-74 933-130-75 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17814 BEARD LN UNIT,#73 17818 BEARD LN UNIT,#74 17832 BEARD LN UNIT, #75 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7001 933-130-76 933-130-77 933-130-78 OCCUPANT DREW ROBERT THOMAS TR OCCUPANT 17826 BEARD LN UNIT, #76 17824 BEARD LN UNIT, #77 17822 BEARD LN UNIT, #78 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-79 933-130-80 933-130-81 BEATY NANCYJ MUNOZ DENISE M OCCUPANT 17841 BEARD LN UNIT,#79 17843 BEARD LN UNIT, #80 17845 BEARD LN UNIT,#81 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-82 933-130-83 933-130-84 LOUGH TIMOTHY CHASE OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17847 BEARD LN UNIT,#82 17851 BEARD LN UNIT,#83 17852 BEARD LN UNIT,#84 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-85 933-130-86 933-130-87 ANDERSON BESS A OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17848 BEARD LN UNIT,#85 17846 BEARD LN UNIT,#86 17844 BEARD LN UNIT, #87 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7001 933-130-88 933-130-89 933-130-90 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17842 BEARD LN UNIT, #88 17831 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#89 17827 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#90 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 o label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 STAPLES Etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ®5160/8160 04A vtlo 09 L8/09 L9® AJGAV oaAe algltedwoo ww L9 x ww sZ}ewjof op 9ganblt3 ®������� 09[9/09L9®fuaAVgj!m 91411edwoo„g/s Z x„L azls lagel 933-130-91 933-130-92 933-130-93 OCCUPANT BOWES KIMBERLY BROOKE OCCUPANT 17825 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#91 17823 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#92 17821 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#93 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 933-130-94 933-130-95 933-130-96 OCCUPANT PETERSON MARK OCCUPANT 17817 LA COSTA LN UNIT, #94 17815 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#95 17811 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#96 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7016 933-130-97 933-130-98 933-130-99 EDBORG CHERIE LYNN KOBAYASHI NATHAN GRANT OCCUPANT 17801 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#97 17822 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#98 17824 LA COSTA LN UNIT,#99 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7016 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7017 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7017 933-131-00 933-131-01 112-781-73 OCCUPANT ONEILL RYAN COURREGES RONALD LAWRENCE 17826 LA COSTA LN UNIT,# 100 17828 LA COSTA LN UNIT,# 101 17901 ELM ST HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7017 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7017 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-4540 112-783-01 112-783-08 112-783-10 HANKINS NICOLE KRONE EBERHARD HIMES SUZANNE CAROL TR 49 TRAILWOOD 13932 HILO LN 971 N CHEYENNE ST IRVINE, CA 92620-1216 SANTA ANA, CA 92705-2859 ORANGE, CA 92869-1916 112-783-29 112-783-31 112-783-51 LE HUONG M TR MONIQUE BROWN LEE W TR KIND HEARTS LLC 1308 SOTO CT 40 BLUE HORIZON 8558 VOLGA RIVER CIR SAN JOSE, CA 95121-2266 LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677-4246 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5536 112-783-55 112-783-66 157-381-03 FOROUDI HAMID SHADOW LANE FOUNTAIN HOMEOWNERS HOOVER DALE E 9210 KERRWOOD LN ASSN 41608 N SHADOW CREEK WAY HOUSTON,TX 77080-5535 431 N BROOKHURST ST, UNIT#100 ANTHEM, AZ 85086-1159 ANAHEIM,CA 92801-5620 157-381-04 157-381-06 157-381-13 TRY-PALMS FINANCIAL INC RUIZ REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST NGUYEN TRINI TRINH 5632 VAN NUYS BLVD, UNIT# 168 32088 VIA SERON 49 MOMENTO VAN NUYS, CA 91401-4602 TEMECULA, CA 92592-1018 IRVINE, CA 92603-4239 157-382-07 157-382-08 157-382-09 GASTON STUARTJ TR THE GASTON LIVING MARSH JAMES PETER TR THE CJ MARSH SMITH SCOTT TR FAMILY TR PO BOX 1416 8282 DRYBANK DR PO BOX 6118 SUNSET BEACH, CA 90742-1416 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-3812 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615-6118 157-383-08 157-383-11 157-383-15 GOMEZ DAVID M KO CYNTHIA TR JEFFREY LAW IRREVOC VAN KEITH KY THAN TR 6572 COLON CIR TR 18961 CLEARVIEW LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-6667 9200 LA BARCA CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-6721 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-4441 ® label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 STAPLES Etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 �j — 7 � �� 04A VV0 0918/0915® fUGAV oane algl}edwoo ww L9 x ww gZ tewaof op at}anbl33 os������ 0918/0919®/uany gjIM algltedwoo„8/g Z x,,G azls lagel 157-384-21 167-531-02 167-531-15 JONES LINDA A TR JONES LIVING TR JU LIN JOHN BUI GREGORY HIEU TR THE MG 12615 NE 13TH WAY 9801 OCEANCREST DR HOANGBUI TR VANCOUVER, WA 98684-4306 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-8201 8331 ALVARADO DR HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-6106 167-531-19 167-531-23 167-531-24 NGUYEN QUYEN CAO LANGSTON GORDON A LANGSTON GORDON A 1050 HUDSON DR 8371 TALBERT AVE 1254 IRVINE BLVD, UNIT#200 TUSTIN, CA 92782-1712 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-1546 TUSTIN, CA 92780-3571 167-593-10 167-594-05 167-594-12 BAILEY JACK BTR BAILEY FAMILY TR MIGUN INVESTMENTS TRAN CALVIN CUONG 22322 HARWICH LN 280 S BEVERLY DR, UNIT#514 181 TARAVAL ST HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-8448 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-3908 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94116-1934 167-594-13 167-594-16 167-594-22 NGUYEN TRUNG VINCENT TR PHAM STEVEN NGUYEN DE DAC 17391 TIDALVIEW LN 14902 JACKSON ST A 8518 CAPE CANAVERAL AVE, UNIT#51 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649-6438 MIDWAY CITY, CA 92655-2221 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5045 167-594-23 167-594-46 167-594-53 DO HUNG N NGUYEN HOA THI TR HMJ TR F V HOME LLC 14902 LAYTHAM LN 322 SUMMER LN 5181 PEARCE DR SUGAR LAND,TX 77498-1055 SANTA ANA, CA 92703-6224 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649-3659 167-594-56 167-594-59 167-594-60 SHARMA ANIL KUMAR TR A K&V SHARMA BACA TRANSITO FOUNTAIN WALK CORP LIVING TR 8432 CAPE NEWBURY DR 3020 OLD RANCH PKWY 20151 AZURE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-4412 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740-2765 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92648-2657 167-594-64 167-594-65 167-594-66 FOUNTAIN WALK CORP FOUNTAIN WALK CORP FOUNTAIN WALK CORP 3020 OLD RANCH PKWY 3020 OLD RANCH PKWY 3020 OLD RANCH PKWY SEAL BEACH, CA 90740-2765 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740-2765 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740-2765 167-601-18 167-601-21 167-601-22 SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH 13280 CHAPMAN AVE PO BOX 14195 PO BOX 14195 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92840-4414 ORANGE, CA 92863-1595 ORANGE, CA 92863-1595 933-130-01 933-130-03 933-130-04 HAUGAARD KRISTINE E JENNIFER PARSONS LIVING TRUST WRIGHT CONSTANDEANNA ELENIE TR 1830 SHELLBROOK DR NW 5462 MEADOW CIR 163 CHANDON HUNTSVILLE,AL 35806-3400 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649-4027 LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677-5734 933-130-08 933-130-09 933-130-11 NOCETI JOSEPH A TR LICCARDO ROBERT OZAWA MASUMI TR MASUMI OZAWA 18406 TAMARIND ST 2108 E RANCHO DR 2012 TR FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5832 PHOENIX, AZ 85016-2719 17871 MAGGIE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 ® label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 4` � � STAPLES Etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery ©5160/8160 �, - -7 — -�U---�-;L, 04A ` V0 09 L8/09 L9® AAAV pane alggedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z}ewiof op au9no113 �� ���� 09L8/09L9®tiaAV ql!m alglfedwoo„8/9 Z x„L azls lagel O 933-130-13 933-130-15 933-130-16 CLEVELAND DEIRDRE WASHINGTON WILLIE KWOLEK JOSEPH 17881 MAGGIE LN 17899 MAGGIE LN 17897 MAGGIE LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 933-130-17 933-130-19 933-130-20 JOHNSON JEFFERY LEE COMER JOHN CHRITOPHER HARA KATIE 16641 EVERGREEN CIR 17891 MAGGIE LN 10749 LA TERRAZA AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-2311 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-3918 933-130-21 933-130-24 933-130-25 RODRIGUEZ GLORIA L TR PAYNE FAMILY TRUST CHATWIN JAMES A 17887 MAGGIE LN 6201 MORNINGSIDE DR 2013 HOLLY AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7019 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-6103 ONTARIO, CA 91762-6323 933-130-26 933-130-27 933-130-28 WHITENER RITA RUDER NATASHA MILLER TODD JONATHAN 17892 HAWES LN 17888 HAWES LN 3535 W EUREKA DR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 ANAHEIM, CA 92804-4687 933-130-30 933-130-31 933-130-35 HELM BRADY HILLIER MERI TR THE HILLIER SURVIVORS SKOUG WILLIAM C 17880 HAWES LN TR 17887 HAWES LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 4955 HAYVENHURST AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 ENCINO, CA 91436-1112 933-130-38 933-130-39 933-130-41 DIAZ TERESITA DE JESUS TR KOLLER-NIELSEN MICHAEL R DESTATTE DENNIS NEIL TR 17911 HAWES LN 18453 SANTA EUGENIA ST 18322 RAIN CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7014 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5601 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-1076 933-130-42 933-130-47 933-130-48 HUERTA FAMILY TRUST DAGES VICKY L TR MESSINA MARK TR 3827 HUMBOLDT DR 7822 BAYPORT DR 17890 POLLARD LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649-2169 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-5701 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 933-130-51 933-130-52 933-130-54 CARTER DEBORAH A ROSA ROBERT SNYDER ROBERT F TR 17912 POLLARD LN 5941 KENBROOK DR 18144 BIRD CT HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-1019 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5860 933-130-55 933-130-57 933-130-58 BENAC DON S DEPILLO VICKI LYNN TR V L DEPILLO FAMILY ELLNA LOUISE MACK LIVING TRUST 17891 POLLARD LN TR 17883 POLLARD LN HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7009 8401 IVY CIR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646-3824 933-130-59 933-130-61 933-130-62 JUNE COAST PROPERTIES JOYCE THERESA L TR ROTH JAMES D TR ROTH FAMILY REVOC 18652 FLORIDA ST, UNIT# 360 17873 POLLARD LN LIVING TR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-6096 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7009 204 E TERRACE DR HANFORD, CA 93230-2126 e STAPLE,So etiquette oformat 25 mm/x'67 mpm col /mpat b e a ec�Avery05160/8160��� 7 04A VV0 09 L8/09 LS® AJaAV pane algitedwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z tewaof op a:lqanDq 0��� ��� 09 L8/09 L9®fu9AV ql!m algltedwoo„2/9 Z x„L azls lagel 933-130-64 933-130-65 933-130-67 TAKAHASHI RANDALL T TR PAPARELLA BENJAMIN D JR TR B D JR&V PAHLAVAN ALI TR A& E HANSEN- 30525 VIA LINDOSA PAPARELLA LIVING T PAHLAVAN LIVING TR LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677-2377 8739 FRAZER RIVER CIR 10475 FALCON AVE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-5502 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-7411 933-130-68 933-130-70 933-130-71 KAATMANN JON MANTHORNE TODD C JAMES E ANDERSON 2021 TRUST 17815 BEARD LN 8926 CARDINAL AVE 17802 BEARD LN HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7001 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-6326 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-72 933-130-73 933-130-74 ZIA TRUST INC TR BENJAMIN MCDONALD ROBERTA A TR GOODING WAYNE W 6301 INDIAN SCHOOL RD NE, UNIT#800 17814 BEARD LN 17818 BEARD LN ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87110-8156 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-75 933-130-76 933-130-78 DAVIA LOUIS ANDERSON BRIAN BESHAY MINA MICHEIL THAB 17832 BEARD LN 6891 EVENING HILL DR 17822 BEARD LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-2105 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-81 933-130-83 933-130-84 JOHNSON EARL E WARREN SHELDON LTR BELLI MINDYTR 17845 BEARD LN 16649 SPRUCE CIR 321 S VISTA DEL CANON HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7001 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-2348 ANAHEIM, CA 92807-3836 933-130-86 933-130-87 933-130-88 DROKER SHAW LEELAND TR GOAD-MEINES SUSAN GOETZ MARY ANN TR M A GOETZ REVOC 4572 SCENARIO DR 17844 BEARD LN TR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649-2221 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 17842 BEARD LN HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7001 933-130-89 933-130-90 933-130-91 WISE KENNETH A TR ANDERSON PETER TR SORRENTINO AUGUSTINO TR PO BOX 92992 6891 EVENING HILL DR 924 SANDWOOD PL LONG BEACH, CA 90809-2992 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-2105 SAN PEDRO, CA 90731-1204 933-130-93 933-130-94 933-130-96 WILLIAMS JUSTIN TROY PHILIP J TR KOTANJIAN NICHOLAS 17821 LA COSTA LN 1716 BAYOU WAY 17811 LA COSTA LN HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7016 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740-5753 HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647-7016 933-130-99 933-131-00 APPLICANT GREEN FAMILY TRUST CHIRGWIN ANDREW THE OLSON COMPANY, ATTN: BEN R. 2132 SEA VILLAGE CIR 17826 LA COSTA LN JOHNSON CARDIFF BY THE SEA, CA 92007-1200 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647-7017 3010 OLD RANCH PKWY,SUITE# 100 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 OWNER LANGSTON GORDON A 4 8371 TALBERT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92646-1546 _7 o label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 STAPLES Etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 04A Moore, Tania From: Christine Gonzalez <cgonzales@scng.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 3:28 PM To: Moore, Tania Cc: Switzer, Donna; Esparza, Patty; Estanislau, Robin; De Coite, Kim Subject: Re: PH Notice - EPA 22-003 (7-11) GPA 21-002 MND 21-003 (Olson) Attachments: 11537548.pdf affidavit OC Register Legal Advertising Sales Coordinator Chrissy Gonzalez 1771 S. Lewis St. Anaheim, CA 92805 714-796-6736 M-F 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Lunch 12 Noon to 1:00 p.m. Closed Sat. and Sun. On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:49 AM Christine Gonzalez<c&onzales scng com>wrote: Cost $540.64, pub FIB Wave 5/26 PLEASE NOTE Community Paper Memorial Day Deadlines Publication Thursday June 2, 2022 Submission Deadline 3pm, Wednesday May 25. Approvals and changes loam, Thursday May 26. OC Register Legal Advertising Sales Coordinator Chrissy Gonzalez 1771 S. Lewis St. Anaheim, CA 92805 714-796-6736 i M-F 8:00 a.m. -4:30 p.m. Lunch 12 Noon to 1:00 p.m. Closed Sat. and Sun On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 9:36 AM Moore, Tania<Tania.Moorena,surfcijy. hb.org>wrote: Good morning Chrissy, Please publish the attached notice in The Wave on 5/26. Thank you, Tania Moore, CIVIC Senior Deputy City Clerk City Clerk's Office 714-536-5209 tan ia.moore(a)-surfcity-hb.org z Huntington Beach Wave 1771 S. Lewis Street Anaheim, CA 92805 714-796-2209 5190751 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY OF PROOF OF PUBLICATION CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT 2000 MAIN ST Legal No. 0011537548 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648-2763 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF-HUNTINGTON BEACH U NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, June 7,2022,at 6:00 p.m. EPA 22-003 7-11 GPA 21-002 ZMA 21-001 MP in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following Planning and Zoning items: AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ❑ 1. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMMIWDMMWT__ND_�_22_00"- 11 GAS SIATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, pp_! ant :• Julie Morris, 2521 Fairmount Street, Dallas, TX 75201 Appellant: AF-GHBM. LLC, 2521 Fairmount Street, $$, Dallas, TX 75201 Request: To remove Condition of Approval No. 6(b) of Conditional Use Permit No. 19-014 requiring all County of Orange existing overhead utilities along the property's westerly property line to be undergrounded. The Planning Commission held a public hearinq of EPA No. 22-003 on April 26, 2022 and denied the request. Location' 16171 Beach Boulevard, 92647 (southwest corner of Beach Boulevard and Stark Drive) City Contact :Tess Nguyen,Associate Planner I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the ❑ 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT(GPA) NO.21-00 ONI- County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years,and —NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MNO) NO. 21-UUJ (i5 bUN ED not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I TOIM1iR H Esj a r nc Ben R. Johnson, The Olson clerk of the Huntington Beach Wave, a Company Proper Ty Owner : Mary Langston Request: GPA am the principal 9 To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low newspaper that has been adjudged to be a newspaper of Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) ZMA: To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) MND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed proiect. Orange, State of California, on July 1, 1998, Case No. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on these A-185906 in and for the Cityof Huntington Beach, Count applications on May 10,2022 and recommended approval to the g y City Council. Location: 8371-8461 Talbert Avenue, 92647 of Orange, State of California;that the notice, of which the northwest corner of Talbert Avenue and Newland Street) Clay annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in Contact : Ricky Ramos e regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #1 is categorically exempt each re 9from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act any supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule) of the CEQA Guidelines because there is no potential that the removal of the subiect condition of approval will have a significant effect on the environment. 05/26/2022 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the initial environmental assessment for Item#2 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item #2,with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Mitigated Negative Declaration No.21-003 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Community I certify(or declare) under the penalty of perjury under the Development Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271. laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct: ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office or online Executed at Anaheim, Orange County, California, on at http_(/www.huntingtonbeachca.go_v_on Thursday,June 2,2022. Date: May 26, 2022. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, You may be limited to raising only those issues You or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence Cl1 delivered the City at,or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Community Development Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Robin Estanislau,City Clerk ch Signature 2000 Man Streof et,2nd on Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachco.gov[H B PublicComments/ Published Huntington Beach Wave May 26,2022 11537548 r.LP1-12/15/16 6/3/2022 ANTI N G To \N,�RPORA = Olson Townhomes City Council June 7, 2022 �F B• 17, 1909, P• `� CpUNTy Project Location 8371-8461 Talbert Ave r pT I NGTpy 1 Q� `PtCFI041tF0 U 2 9ycFppUNTY Fw nMMUNICATION Meet% Date: 1 Agenda Item fNo.• 6/3/2022 Project Request General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 21-002 - To amend the General Plan designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) R ECM .. R� RL (��NTINGro O` "'ORP GF4�o 4A Rai ax+z� t61�5ri.x3 i F9 R RL L 9 W v2 a ° FQ Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan �OUNTV CPS Project Request Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA) No. 21-001 - To amend the zoning designation from Residential Low Density (RL) to Residential Medium Density (RM) 3 `, RL NTINGTO t�tL' RL v Q= Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning �OOUNTV CPS\ 2 6/3/2022 Project Request Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 21-003 — To analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project A A %IINUTO Off( XpAP ORF=FQ �� � �Q F�UUNTY CP�� Project Request May 10, 2022 Planning Commission approved (no i appeal): Tentative Tract Map 19157—To - + subdivide 2.07 acres for condominium purposes Conditional Use Permit 21-004 —To develop 34 townhomes and i �..F .,... ,�.. .> •w allow up to an 8 ft. tall retaining �..»•».._$.-,��.». �.� wall topped with a 6 ft. tall wall at west property line 2 92cF�UUNTY CP�\�oe 3 6/3/2022 Analysis ■ MND adequate and complete ■ Consistent with General Plan and its goals and policies ■ Compatible with the area ■ Adds to the City's housing stock, including affordable housing, and RHNA targets %T I NGTO/� Off( `MpAPOR<!Fp � F9 9vC Ff6,I.i905.'° C�Q �ODUNTV CPS\ Recommendation Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the request based on the reasons cited %I I NGT0A'Y' O` \'AOT?CRSIa � � F9 FOOUNTY CPS\ 4 6/3/2022 vN1 I N GTo \NppRPORgTFO -37 E n d �F ��. p• C.O� B 17, COUNTY cP� 5 6/7/2022 a o Talbert • Newland 0 0 City of Huntington Beach City Council I1E • • Olson's R ` Townhornes • 30 Years designing and building in-fill communities • Number One in the Nation for Customer Service • Number One in the Nation for Overall Homebuyer Purchase and Ownership Experience •Assembled Award Winning Design Team • Champion Program —Stay involved for the long term ,SEAPPLEMENTAL CEO MUNICATION uieatng Dui: !�Z�2_z 1 Ages Item No.; caq p,:;l ys/) 5/7/2022 Talbert , ,Townhomes Site C Ir �!af i r Talbert 'Townh� Communr ti rnes • Began in 2020 during COVID • Changed Outreach Approach • Community Feedback from Noticing 2 6/7/2022 1 h 1 Talbert&NewlandTownhomes Commun •Visited the Neighborhood 12 Times • Knocked on 172 Doors •Spoke with 68 Community Members Talbert D Y,J r • 'Townhomes Communit • Concerns • Vehicular • Privacy&Scale •Support • Beautifies a Challenged Property • Remove Blight and Vagrancy • Increases Revenues for City Services and Schools • Increases Property Values • Provides Economic Stimulus 3 6/7/2022 Talbert&NewlandTownhomes Existing Cond�tNo Talbert&Newland Existing, TownhornesStruc lit, s 6/7/2022 Talbert&NewlandTownhomes Existing Co Talbert& w . f I • 'Townhomes Existing C R 5 6/7/2022 ( s � Talbert&NewlandTownhomes Existing Co E M� Talbert&NewlandTownhomes Existing r 6/7/2022 -25 � � Talbert&NewlandStreet . .�ofi: Townhomes Site Co rT Talbert&Newland e�%� i� Townhomes �'rG�r*I �i t�+�� I�L -�►� I�i3 6/7/2022 Talbert Townhomes Vela Automatic Opening Gate i I ... i� ■mamAa�u1�mlt{ T+J I Automatic Opening Gate Room for 2 car stacking Talbert&Newland Townhornes Vehicular Maneuver Concerns �s I e e t e e k e x x 1 d � Nor. I r l I _ .. .. _..:J AYE Vehicular Maneuver Concerns 8 1 Talbert&Newland Townhomes TIM IN A.Ml �_i.t.3�o,�'i�}•fit► �:J `:�� �1l�ir#' ► Talbert&Newland . T, '- Townhomes 6/7/2022 TalbertTownhomes Privacy an b ,i J J 4 J 9 6 7 6 6 ;• �12] f t i ------------ -- y , , No Third Story Windows Looking North a t { TalbertTownhornes Communi • Increases Revenues to the City •$2,100,000 Paid to the City in Fees (highlights below) • Park: $432,000 • Utilities: $47S,000 • Library: $64,000 • Development Impact: $37,000 •Traffic: $55,000 • School: $240,000 • Permit: $280,000 10 6/7/2022 xt a � Talbert&NewlandTownhomes Community • Local Economic Benefit Forecast of the Subject Community (source NAHB) •One Time Economic Benefit from Construction • $9,700,000 Increase in Local Income • $1,100,000 Increase in Local Taxes/Fees • 135 Local Jobs Created • Ongoing Annual Economic Benefit from 34 Home to the Community • $1,400,000 Increase in Local Income • $345,000 Increase in Local Taxes/Fees • 25 Permanent Local Jobs Created Talbert&NewlandCommui` , wnhornes • Project is Supported by Goals of the General Plan • Support infill development,consolidation of parcels • Encourage a mix of residential types • Encourage housing options located in proximity to employment • Provide housing types with a mix of densities • Neighborhoods and corridors are well designed and contribute to a strong sense of place • CEQA—No Adverse Impacts on the Surrounding Community • Project Provides New Homes to Help Meet State Mandated Housing Requirements—over 13,000 homes • Removes Blighted Structures and Vagrancy Issues • Increase Revenues to the City and Local Businesses 11 6/7/2022 Talbert&NewlandStreet 12 Townhomes r ,d� ° �� rn � Talbert & Newland City of Huntington Beach City Council June 7,2022 i Switzer, Donna From: Frakes, Sandie Sent: Monday,June 6, 2022 8:08 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Proposed Olson Town homes at Talbert and Newland From:Sharon Causer<outdancing4fun@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday,June 3, 2022 12:20 PM SUPPLEMENTAL To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> COMMUNICATION Subject: Proposed Olson Town homes at Talbert and Newland Meeting Date: June 3, 2022 ,agenda Item No., Re: Proposed Olson Town homes My name is Sharon Causer and I live near Newland and Talbert. I do not want a three story condo (Hotel) built. It is going to look awful. What you need to know about this area: There are generally gasoline tankers on the road that start at Gothard and Talbert and are headed to and from the 405 freeway, night and day, 24/7, 365 days a year. If there are flaws in the pavement near the new proposed project, resulting vibrations caused by the tankers over a period of time can damage structures and make life miserable for the residents of the proposed project. Having lived in this neighborhood for over forty years, I have experienced many physical problems (signs of damage) due to heavy vehicles traveling on Talbert. Common examples are nails backing out of two by four inch wall studs that push thru the wall boarding and result in my having to pound the nails back in and re-spackle, many times over the years. I have had to call the city to fix the broken payment to stop the rattling of my house. I am only in a one story house and you are about to subject two and three story buildings to this kind of repeated damage. The corner house next door to me has a cracked brick chimney that is unusable and looks like a road map. This neighbor also told me he had to fix his broken slab inside the house. And we have had to re-plumb our water lines throughout the house at great expense. The proposed project buildings are going to be subject to the traffic out front. Since there are no walls between the buildings and the street traffic, the buildings are ready for a car or truck to come into them. No wall or structure is there to take the initial shock and the speed limit is a full 45 miles per hour. There have been many bad accidents in and around this intersection, including deaths. i June 1, 2022, Orange County Water District mpoliwalkocwd.com. Subject: Water Awareness Month, Drought and Water Supplies. California is in the midst of the most severe drought on record and historic water restrictions have been implemented across the state. Not enough water for the people here now and you want to make the situation worse. Capital Alert, May 16, 2022 : Gavin Newson seeks $5 Billion to Keep California's lights on as summer Blackouts Loom. Fox News, June 17, 2021 CA Power Grid Operator issues Flex Alert ask residents to cut back on power usage. The houses behind the new three story building(s) will not get winter sunlight, not to mention making the parking problem much worse than what they already have. More people will be jaywalking across Talbert to park and get their cars. The Saint Vincent De Paul Catholic Church people already flood the area with their cars on Sundays and church events. The proposed project will be making it even worse. Changing from low density residence to medium density residence and building a three story unit in this area is insane. You would not put this three story project in your neighborhood, why are you doing this to mine? z Switzer, Donna From: LISA R COURTEMARCHE <lisa68hb@verizon.net> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 3:48 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Talbert/ Newland project Hello, I am a resident of HB for 47 years. I grew up before Seacliff ever had a shopping center. I have seen many changes. I understand the laws are allowing more housing units to be built in areas that previously were low density. I knownyou will approve the project that is proposed fir the site on Talbert and Newland. I feel that the current proposal does not allocate enough parking. I am concerned that the "2 car garages" will be similar the the garages at Pacific Ranch that do not fit most cars if you want to exit your vehicle. Also,the planning committee was excited because it will be a nice complex for people to see as they enter HB. The builder said it would be as well. It makes no sense. If they are putting a gate up for safety I would assume it also means they are putting a fence around the complex. This is a very dangerous intersection. A man died in an accident that went through that corner. Also only having 12 additional park8ng spaces will not be enough for each home to even have a guest. If it is like the complex across the street in FV ,the HOA sees not let residents park in the extra spots overnight. Parking will be impossible!! Also the gas trucks from the oil refinery speed down Talbert and rattle the homes. They are an accident waiting to happen. I understand the laws are changing. I am not sure how the process works but I hope that the city council works with the county to improve public transportation to HB. Currently there are no busses down Talbert on the weekends which would be nice if people want to get to various events in centerline Park or visit the cemetery. We need to look at improvements. Also if we are trying to make.more housing for HB residents than make more of these units low to mid income. I hope you feel comfortable when there are multiple accidents in this area because it does not yield to including this many homes and vehicles. L. Courtemarche Sent from the all new AOL app for Android SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meatng (Date: (�/�;,-Ae Z Agenda Item No.: