HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdopt Resolution No. 2022-54 Amending Residential Permit Par *-` 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, CA
City of Huntington Beach 92648
File #: 22-705 MEETING DATE: 9/6/2022
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Al Zelinka, City Manager
VIA: Sean Crumby, Director of Public Works
PREPARED BY: Darren Sam, Senior Traffic Engineer
Subject:
Adopt Resolution No. 2022-54 amending Residential Permit Parking District "L" affecting
residents on Freeborn Drive in Huntington Beach
Statement of Issue:
Residents on Freeborn Drive have petitioned the City to be included in Permit Parking District "L".
Financial Impact:
The provisions of Chapter 10.42 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code (HBMC) requires residents
seeking inclusion in a residential permit parking district to pay a proportionate share of the cost to
amend the district accordingly. Typical costs include but are not limited to: (1) installation of signs and
curb markings, which are initially funded in the General Fund Signs and Marking business unit
10085302, and (2) staff time to issue permits, which are funded in the General Fund Transportation
Management business unit 10085301. The total cost for this parking district amendment, which will
be incorporated into the permit fees, is estimated at $900.
Recommended Action:
Adopt Resolution No. 2022-54, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
Amending Permit Parking District "L" Within the City of Huntington Beach."
Alternative Action(s):
Do not approve the recommended action, and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis:
Permit Parking District L is located south of Warner Avenue and west of Edwards Street (Attachment
1). The parking district was established by City Council Resolution No. 2008-60 on September 15,
2008 and includes Edwards Street between Meadow Crest Drive and Freeborn Drive, and Meadow
Crest Drive between Edwards Street and Northfield Lane. The amendment consists of adding
Freeborn Drive between Edwards Street and Erwin Lane to Permit Parking District L due to on-street
City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 2 Printed on 8/31/2022
pawere2S4 Leg15tar-11
File #: 22-705 MEETING DATE: 9/6/2022
parking impacts from commuter vehicle parking. The current parking district and proposed
amendment areas are shown on Attachment 2.
As required by HBMC Chapter 10.42 Permit Parking Districts, staff reviewed the request, determined
the concerns of the residents were valid, and considered the proposed amendment area to be
reasonable. Per HBMC Chapter 10.42, ballots were sent the affected properties with 78% voting in
support of the permit parking district amendment. A minimum of 75% of the property units in favor of
the proposal is required to continue the evaluation.
As required by code, staff investigated the parking conditions on Freeborn Drive. Field reviews of the
area showed that Freeborn Drive between Northfield Lane and Edwards Street experiences parking
use from commuter vehicles with the highest parking occupancy occurring on the north side of
Freeborn Drive. The highest parking occupancy times on Freeborn Drive were observed to occur on
the weekends and evenings.
Based on the observed parking conditions and discussions with residents, staff recommends
amending Permit Parking District "L" to include Freeborn Drive between Edwards Street and Erwin
Lane. Staff believes findings can be made demonstrating that commuter vehicle parking
unreasonably and regularly interferes with the use of available street parking for residents or their
guests consistent with HBMC 10.42 requirements as a basis for establishing permit parking.
CIAB/Public Works Commission Action:
None Required.
Environmental Status:
The project is categorically exempt from CEQA.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Infrastructure & Parks
Attachment(s):
1. Vicinity Map
2. District L Map
3. District L Evaluation
4. Resolution 2022-54
City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 2 Printed on 8/31/2022
powered Legistar-
s
i
CPU) BOLSA AVE. NCO PERMIT PARKING
N N DISTRICT L
= cn
Mc FADDEN AVE.
L)EDINGER z ui
N (n AVE.
z ~
'v
0 prHEIL Q z Of 3 VE. m
Q
a z F-
Q0c~n o �' w w 0
N Q m WARNER Jo AVE.
0
SLATER AVE.
w 405
m
,0 TALBERT AVE.
9�
PACIFIC �� ELLIS AVE.
GARFIELD v -j AVE.
F-: F-: F-:
V) V) V) (n
YORKTOWN AVE. 3
ADAMS AVE.
cn
INDIANAPOLIS AVE. Y
OCEAN �qLc<` z o It w
ATLANTA J z = AVE. m
m 3 < V)
U W m
w z HAMILTON AVE.
m
N tier BANNING
A VE.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
VICINITY MAP ATTACHMEN
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT L
or
N M to 1l-
M M M d It I
c0 c0 c0 c0 cD to c0 w
NO SCALE 17101
EADOW CREST DR?
17111 17112 N M 17111
to w to to
17121 17122 17121
17131 17132 17131 17132 17131 w
W
C�
z 17141 17142
17141 17142 17141z
p O W
17151 17152 17151 17152 17151 o
17161 oo 17162 17161 0 17162 17161 N o
z O p W
O ix
17171 17172 17171 17172 17171 w 17172 17171 3
J W
C7
17191 i 17192 17191 17192 17191 w 17192 17191
cx
17201 `j 17202 17201 17202 17201 17202 17201
YY ei.• • ���.yr:s• •w,�,i'S'a�a ..`i.�e.•. �4>L.?r•c' �s: �tititi��.V�h}'N.�i_a3:.c.i+..•S: y� 4s:.N�a��;�,�,f
yJ.t:•��Ji+..t~'�+'T1,�: Ii:'- ryJj?w"{:i�i!.7�::��a:.�'.I�'.• ''f4�. S$d/', I}i�he..'.•},.ia..4 iF,�i�,!:..4''';�''�'�.�..::.:i�_i:..r:°.y.F.'?C..,�._;ars,.V.«i-�!�:-�4 C'•C:.,�'MF...a..?•;Ys.�i,.t'.'4,;v,,nl.:�fi�.w"_.:P�•K{'''iS.�ti•,:.;:+k.i:a��r t,R•�;,:-'Y.'��"":-�]��,.?.r,�:.v1':F�.fR.�E�E;fBO-.5R'.N .iD.e:R �;.`1l�.!�„•✓fi.`iC..i!W• i3.�5:���^
.". A....tA-32
'
M � 1l') wI� CNp pNj
p N M sF ul
M M M M M M
c0 w w to c0 cD co c0 to co cD c0 cD
EXISTING PERMIT PARKING (12 AM - 6 AM, EVERYDAY INCLUDING HOLIDAYS)
PROPOSED PERMIT PARKING AREA
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
� ATTACHMEN'
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT L AMENDMENT 2
Proposed Permit Parking District L
Amendment
Permit Parking District L was established by City Council Resolution No. 2008-60 on September 15,
2008 and consists Edwards Street (frontage road) between Freeborn Drive and Meadow Crest Drive,
and Meadow Crest Drive between Edwards Street and Northfield Lane. The initial proposed
amendment is to include Freeborn Drive between Edwards Street (frontage road) and Northfield Lane.
The location of the neighborhood is west of Edwards Street south of Warner Avenue and is shown on
the vicinity map below.
�c'Z6 q�0
i
P1-m BALSA AVE. co PEwrT PAww.
DiS'MT L
Mc FADDEN VE.
v
EDINGER z N' AVE.pp
Ak
0ZHEIL 4 Q sZZ` VE.8
C�.~ IL
� # W
v! � C1
n a m WARNER Ll ` AVE.
cs
SLATER AVE. 6
Uj m 405
d TALBERT AVE.
PACIFIC ELLIS AVE.
GAR FIELD AVE.
r r V: OO
O YORKIOwN AVE. 3
ADAMS AVE. w
INDIANAPOLIS AVE.
OCEAN & Ix
O
TLANTA Z = AVE.
N
Ui < m
w HAMILTON AVE.
ANNING
A _
VICINITY MAP - PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT L
1 Page
362
Residents along Freeborn Drive have requested to be included in the Permit Parking District L. They
submitted a petition to add their addresses to District L due to on-street parking impacts from the
nearby apartments and condominiums with the same parking restrictions as the current district
(midnight to 6 a.m., every day, holidays included). Figure 1 shows the current and initial requested
permit parking areas for Parking District L.
t0 'D m W 1D -O W %0
NO scKE 1710I
EADOW CREST DFXtll
17111 �17112 N N n 17111
u eu o
17121 17122 17121
17131 17132 17131 17132 17131 ¢
W
C�
17141 3 17142 17141 17142 17141
10 z 0
17151 S 17152 17151 17152 17151 o
s oc � tr
17161 p 17162 17161 a_ 17162 17161 m
F C G W
K
17171 17172 17171 17172 17171 W 17172 17171
J W
17191 Z 17192 17191 17192 17191 W 17192 17191
'3
17201 W 17202 17201 17202 17201 17202 t7201
r'
FREEBORN DR
kn b h N cV
i0 0 0m fn M M O K f f
p i0 W t0 W W m
EXISTING PERMIT PARKING
REQUESTED PERMIT PARKING
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT L
Figure 1. Existing and Proposed Permit Parking Areas for Permit Parking District L
As required by Municipal Code Chapter 10.42, staff reviewed the request, determined the petition and
concerns of the residents were valid, and considered the proposed amendment area to be reasonable.
Due to the potential parking impacts moving to nearby streets should the requested permit parking
area be implemented, staff included Englewood Circle, Northfield Lane, and the first block of Erwin
Lane to vote on the proposal. The Municipal Code allows staff to modify the originally proposed
2 LPage
363
boundaries of the proposal that may be affected by permit parking to provide the opportunity to be
included as if part of the original request. The streets selected to vote on potentially being added to
Parking District L are shown in Figure 2.
ra
NO XALE 17101
EADAW CREST DR
1711.1 171t2 N N r 17111
tY0 b m Ip
1`7121 17122 17121
17131 17132
17131 , 17132 17131
W
. .
on
171421714t 17141 17142 17111
17151 17151 112
Cr
17151 '� a
s o s
17161 ,z 17162 1T16/ 0 17162 17161 N a
� W
17171 17172 17571 17172 1Tt71 ,g 17172 17171
J ur W
17191 17192 t7191 17192 17191 17192 17191
ar'
17201 'W 17202 17201 t7202 t7201 17202 17201
FREEBORN DR
M ♦ Iff INS. m OI N Tr_
Nka
I 0 W W
I I
EXISTING PERMIT PARKING
0 STREETS SELECTED TO VOTE ON PROPOSAL TO ADD PERMIT PARKING
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT L
Figure 2. Streets Selected to Vote on Permit Parking Proposal
Staff prepared and mailed letters to the identified properties explaining the permit parking district
requirements, boundaries, and included ballots for voting on the parking district amendment.
Per Municipal Code 10.42 a minimum of 75% of the property units (1 vote per unit) shall be in favor of
the permit parking district amendment to move the request for further consideration. Of the 52
identified properties, 34 ballots were returned with 20 votes in favor of the permit parking district
amendment. The voting results are graphically summarized in Figure 3.
3 1 Page
364
� b b b b O tYO
17101
EA00W CREST OR
i r R
17111 17112 `� N M Nr 17111
Y Y •/
O +D O m
17121 5 17122 17121
9 17131 17132 z
17131 17132 17131
W
z 17141 17142
17141 17142 17141 i
Z O U4
17151 n 17152 17151 '17152 17151 w c
17161 17162 17161 17162 17161 c
a � W
17171 17172 17171 17172 17171 °J 17172 17171 3
W
17191 M` 17192 1 17191 17192 17191 17192 17191
17201 1, 17202 17201 17202 17201 17202 17201
FREEBORN 0R V<— 50% 92X —�
78'X
N+f f t0 n O N M tt 'n N
M M1 M Fn M �t Y
10 10 -D b tD 0 � W s*o w a m p
EXISTING PERMIT PARKING
XX% PERCENT PROPERTY UNITS VOTING "YES" TO ADD PERMIT PARKING
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT L
Figure 3. Percent of Property Units in Support of Permit Parking
Englewood Circle, Northfield Lane, and the first block of Irwin Lane voting results showed limited
interest with establishing permit parking and were removed from consideration. On Freeborn Drive
between Irwin Lane and Northfield Lane 50 percent voted in favor of the proposal. The voting results
on Freeborn Drive between Northfield Lane and Edwards St showed the most interest with 92% of the
properties voting in support of permit parking. Combining the two street sections on Freeborn Drive
between Erwin Lane and Edwards St resulted in 78% in favor of permit parking.
4 1 Page
365
As required by code staff investigated the parking conditions on Freeborn Drive. The code requires
that facts exist that reasonably establish that unrestricted parking creates a situation in which the
subject streets cannot be used for regular parking by residents or their guests, or creates a situation
that commuter vehicles or their occupants produce significant sources of health, safety, or welfare
concerns to continue the process for further consideration. Below summarizes the on-street parking
information gathered from field surveys of the area.
Street No. Parked Parking Percent
Vehicles Capacity Occupancy
Freeborn Drive, north side(Northfield to Edwards) 6 11 55%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Northfield to Edwards) 4 14 29%
Freeborn Drive, north side(Erwin to Northfield) 3 6 50%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Erwin to Northfield) 2 6 33%
Table 1. Weekday AM Parking Survey
Street No. Parked Parking Percent
Vehicles Capacity Occupancy
Freeborn Drive,north side(Northfield to Edwards) 8 11 73%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Northfield to Edwards) 7 14 50%
Freeborn Drive,north side(Erwin to Northfield) 1 6 17%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Erwin to Northfield) 2 6 33%
Table 2. Weekday PM Parking Survey
Street No. Parked Parking Percent
Vehicles Capacity Occupancy
Freeborn Drive,north side(Northfield to Edwards) 9 11 82%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Northfield to Edwards) 8 14 57%
Freeborn Drive, north side(Erwin to Northfield) 2 6 33%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Erwin to Northfield) 1 6 17%
Table 3. Weekend AM Parking Survey
Street No. Parked Parking Percent
Vehicles Capacity Occupancy
Freeborn Drive, north side(Northfield to Edwards) 9 11 82%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Northfield to Edwards) 7 14 50%
Freeborn Drive, north side(Erwin to Northfield) 2 6 33%
Freeborn Drive,south side(Erwin to Northfield) 1 6 17%
Table 4. Weekday PM Parking Survey
SlPage
366
Analysis:
Field reviews of the area showed that the north side of Freeborn Drive between Northfield Lane and
Edwards Street experiences high parking use from commuter vehicles with the greatest demand
occurring on the weekend. This could be due to being more convenient as vehicles are most likely
arriving from the east from Edwards St and the north side is an area with an open parking segment
without driveways. On-street parking along the south portion is not as impacted as the north side but
appears some commuter vehicle parking occurs on the south side. For this parking district
amendment request the residents only expressed concerns with the commuter vehicle parking and the
availability of on-street parking for themselves and guests.
Municipal Code 10.42 requires that specific conditions shall exist for a parking district request to move
forward for consideration to the City Manager's office. These include: unrestricted parking creates a
situation where on-street parking cannot be regularly used by residents and guests; or, unrestricted
parking by commuter vehicles produces significant sources of health, safety, or welfare concerns.
Based on the field evaluations and discussions with the residents staff finds that the unrestricted
parking on Freeborn Drive creates a situation where the commuter parking regularly interferes with
residents and their guests parking. Staff supports amending Permit Parking District L and recommends
adding the properties along Freeborn Drive between Erwin Lane and Edwards Street to the current
parking district (Figure 4). Of those 18 properties, 78% (14 of 18) voted in favor of permit parking due
to commuter vehicle parking impacts.
6 Page_
367
M m m U m
scxe 171 11
EADOW CREST�DR
1711t 17112 r ,� 17111
b b as
17121 17122 17121
17131 17132 1713i 17132 17131
v
17141 1 17142 17141 17142 171A1
2
G O f~tt
17151 L� 17152 1715.1 17152 17151 c
17161 O 17162 17161 c 17162 17161' rn o
2 � W
17171 17172 17171 17 772 17171 17172 17171 c
t� W
17191 z 17192 17191 17192 17191 17192 17191
3
x
17201 �' 17202 17201 17202 17203 17202 17201
-F.;
rNn F N N t W a O N n f n n
rn M M M M M M
EXISTING PERMIT PARKING
RECOMMENDED PERMIT PARKING ADDITION
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT L
Figure 4. Recommended Permit Parking Addition to Parking District L.
7 Page
368
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-54
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING PERMIT PARKING
DISTRICT "L" WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 4051, allowing the amendment
of permit parking districts in residential areas under certain conditions; and
The citizens owning certain properties fronting the residential street know as Freeborn
Drive between Edwards Street and Erwin Lane have petitioned to be included in Permit Parking
District "L"; and
The Director of Public Works reviewed the petition, sent a ballot for further consideration
to residents of the petitioned streets, and caused an investigation which reasonably established
that unrestricted parking; interferes with available parking for residents and guests;
Therefore, the Director of Public Works has found the requirements of Ordinance 4051 to
be reasonably fulfilled, and determined that the Permit Parking District will not affect other uses
of on-street parking.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
resolve as follows:
1. The above recitals are true and correct.
2. Permit Parking District"L" is hereby amended to include properties fronting the
above-mentioned roadway, effective every day from 12:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the lb"o- day of , 2022
Mayor
REVIEZd,'
VED: APPROVED AS FORM:
City Attorney
ITI TED AND ROVE
Director,off ubli orks
22-11696/288993
Res. No. 2022-54
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY.OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a Regular meeting thereof held on September 6, 2022 by the following vote:
AYES: Peterson, Bolton, Delgleize, Carr, Posey, Moser, Kalmick
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RECUSE: None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California
Moore, Tania
From: Esparza, Patty
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 12:46 PM
To: Moore, Tania
Subject: FW: Permit Parking District L Amendment CC Item 22-705 Communication
Attachments: Fugard.pdf
Supplemental communication
Patty Esparza, C1I C
Assistant City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
(714) 536-5260
From: Sam, Darren <Darren.Sam@surfcity-hb.org>
Sent:Tuesday, September 6, 2022 12:45 PM
To: Esparza, Patty<PEsparza@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: Permit Parking District L Amendment CC Item 22-705 Communication
Hello Patty,
The attached communication was received from an HB resident regarding the parking district amendment to be
considered this evening.
Darren Sam
City of Huntington Beach, Public Works—Transportation
(714)374-1619
SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
Mw&v tee: q tOlao��.
Agerwis rom No.,•
From: Bill Fugard<bill.fugard@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday,August 30, 2022 6:26 PM
To:Stachelski, Bob<bstachelski@surfcity-hb.org>
Cc: HP ePrint<billf305O@hpeprint.com>
Subject: Residential Permit Parking Disttrict'T'Amendment
Hi Bob:
Thanks for your August 24th letter update.
We reside at 17201 Edwards Street, HB and support the proposed
amendment.
Thanks & regards,
William & Jean Fugard
17201 Edwards Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
714-842-8719 (H)
714-642-6219 (M)
+++++++++++++++++++++
i
Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 3:04 PM
To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org
Subject: FW: Freeborn Drive permit parking
From: steve mattus<stevenmmatus@yahoo.com>
Sent:Tuesday, September 6, 2022 3:02 PM
To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject: Freeborn Drive permit parking
Please yote YES on residential permit parking district L. Tonight. Thank you
Steve Matus
6442 Freeborn Drive
Huntington Beach
92647
i
Moore, Tania
From: Levin, Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 4:58 PM
To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org
Subject: FW:
From:Jack& Roberta Ames<jrames60@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday,September 6, 2022 4:55 PM
To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>
Subject:
Proposed Residential Permit District "L" Amendment
Please vote YES on the permit to include Freeborn Drive between Edwards Street and Irwin Lane.
Thank you,
John and Roberta Ames
6392 Freeborn Dr, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
i
CITY OF HT TNTINGTON BEACH
Public Works Department
Director of Public Works j
August 24, 2022 ?u ,,/6
SUBJECT: Proposed Residential Permit Parking District"L"Amendment
Dear Hun Kjton Beach Reskku :
The City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department received a request to amend Residential
Permit Parking District "L" in your neighborhood. The proposed permit parking district amendment
is to include Freeborn Drive between Edwards Street and Irwin Lane to the current parking district.
Please refer to Figure 1 on the back.
Residents in the proposed area have met all of the criteria required by City policy. City staff has
investigated the request and has recommended the proposal for consideration at the regularly
scheduled City Council meeting on September 6, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. Residents are encouraged to
attend and provide input concerning the request. Written comments can also be sent by mail or
e-rnaR and wiil be provided to the City Council if received by noon on September 6. 2022.
Mail comments to:
Bob Stac helski
City of Huntington Beach
Public Woft Department
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Email comments to:
bsta isla@surk*-hb.org
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Public Works
at(714)536-5431.
Sincerely,
Robert Stacheiski
Transportation Manager
Enclosure
RS/DS:rsv
2000 lain Street, California 92648+ Phone 714-535-5431 ; www.huntin.gtonheachca.gov
r
[ \ co co to m too m F to too
.�� � 1 1 1 I I I l I
£ £ ! tY
17111 17112clq I N M04
17111
"It It
to
\ 1 1 1 17121 1 1 17127 t 1 .----- ,. .�► ► �, 1/ 1
z: . . ..
t t s r r e. i 1 t 7 a J I �M A t
1 ! y i i f t o ivc IS
W
17141 17142 1714 17142 171 �al1Q—��
1 # k t ...rye's ! r;� } •war-re ? 4746;3 S f 174r-7 }
t
�- 00,i--
17161 p 17162 17161 0 17162 17161 o
Z w
+ t i. '�'l I 17 M1.� 4 171
1 j t`J F
1 t 1
t 17191 s17192 17191 t 17192 t 17191 17192 17191 st
3
rr
��nns L2t.l ♦-snnn ♦-snn� ww 4-snn�w r.
� 1 1 , r>Gvs � � l �t:r:c � . �Esjr � � r�ttrt � €��cut � i stLvc � it€ems
- ... �—y�y""ry�±. � �2.kM1s'�Ja�.i '%`w�{*41��'br T���j�JL.L•��a7"��-3� !
. 4�''."4;�4a�ze�.u.'lu�+l:�lS,s�..+C;ti-r.,gf.vv-.+tsM+"�
M dN tN (D n c 0�3 p N M dN 1n n
M M M M M M
ens t I t ED j w
t l tAfbttt4V #'tWV!l rAXAf?4V 1L AM b AM, t rtKTVAY 1fltt VVffgb MULIUATJj
PROPOSED PERMIT PARKING AREA [
� F
veTY 4F HUNTINGTON °�;�'� �
� r
PERMIT PARKING DISTRICT E AMENDMENT
1