The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMobility Implementation Plan Update 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,CA City of Huntington Beach 92648 File #: 22-742 MEETING DATE: 9/6/2022 Mobility Implementation Plan Update City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 8/31/2022 powered'k7j Legistarl" 9/6/2022 too A ends Item • i y Improve citywide bicycle and pedestrian network options and Balance: Balancing the best mobility interest of residents,visitors, and emergency services is critical for every vibrant city. safety for all users Improve the comfort and design Implementation lens: Identify strategies and implementable system of the Beach Path for all users improvements that help facilitate a balanced and equitable transportation system our residents,businesses and visitors with ■ Plan for an innovative spectrum of practical mobility options. transportation system (micromobilityand shared future proofing: Where bike lanes were once occupied exclusively by mobility) people on bikes,they are now home to people riding electric scooters, motorized skateboards, and micromobility devices(with new devices Build upon the City's longterm being introduced regularly). mobility pedestrian,bicycle, and transitpianningefforts t 1 • 1 Average Commute Time & Distance Results 89% Avg.Auto: 27-30 minutes 12-14 miles 1% Avg.Transit: 41-86 minutes 9-15 miles '% Avg.Bike: 16-26 minutes 2-3 miles "' Avg.Walk: 8-14 minutes .2-.4 miles Why it matters • Almost everyone drivingfor their commute • Transit mode share is very low;mostly transit dependent populations;not attractive to people that have options • Most walking and bike trips are short distances:may be issues of perceived safetyfor longerjourneys 1V GAS Travel Analysis Results • Majority of trips originating in OriginsFigure 12.Trips with ngtonHB end in HB • Very few trips go outside of OC • Exception are work trips,which have higher percentages outside of HB and in Sn LA/Ventura 40% tr Why it Matters • Potential for majority of trips, Hunl*vgton North OC South' especially recreational trips, Beach served by other modes • Only 1 of 3 work trips within HB stay within HB • Seasonal demand grows in summer months 9/6/2022 Overall le the bm"down of level o1 service for the 111 intersections evaluated with e 2040 conditions are sham vh Table 5. w Table s.Lave of•.. Brad—of HunOnptan Beach lrktraae— •^+^•' Av■rya Delay par Average Delay per +µ a Leval of Venda kl Vehicle fa Duahtalhra Percents"al -- - E•Mee ftwillW Unstgndis" Definition IntanaCBona _ 4 IngnMlarq InWreNgr m... A 00 seconds <10 seconds Rod Dar 38.74% � a " 14 c ■ 10 to 20 seconds 10 to 15 seconds Rea flow nably 29.73% s'al i 3 C 201015 seconds 15 to 25 seconds Stale.at �o 20.72 k. • /_ near S flowae y 0 D 35 to 55 seconds 25 to 35 seconds ADProadung 9.01% • "` unstable flow 4` r• a unstable flow. ,�• E 55 to 80 secohtls 35 to 50 seconds operating at 1.80% c �• cmu r 40 . � w•a • • • • • • Core data _ l Bolhh ArA ■ Traffic Volumes ° • � . g ■ ~ � w`�• N Posted Speed Limit deem^v4:o• _; as Control Type . ��s, a8 m °r _�o �`' is Number of Lanes ist ! ■ Pedestrian Crossing Islands 6 • '•.c,��ei A .e= S}. ..�. yy e� •• O.• s e •4 .<}'. �._�.,. - - •�4aY a Y:•lee Neal 4 ` ° Alan PedeatHsn LwN �'•• is of Traffic Stmas • PUS Pacific • PLTS2 Ocean • _ • • PLTS3 ' ••� • PLTS4 7w-- •-Y °Aw e High-stress crossing ,,,�• over 1/8•rnile from nearest low-stress crossing • or traffic signal 3 • 1 Sustainable Mode Analysis : Bicycle Rating System: Low Stress (1 ) to High Stress (4) Why it Matters � Quantify street IQ� typologies based on � I EMIR comfort and Comfort ryPc ogy ofBo 1 ,< exposure Y��5_ p Highlight opportunity areas in ysAW QJi1 I°"o bh ' the pursuit of ER Results network 1IAN 11M, BUS 1:(86/°° ) development • € Intersection ° •,,ate „� BLTS 2:(2�) •`improvements at �° high-speed arterials � BLTS 3:(1%) can open up low- • BLTS 4:(11%) stress network • Excluding LTS 1 the proportions of LTS 2.LTS 31 and LTS 4 are 12%,8%,and 80%respectively. Sustainable Mode Analysis : Transit Why it Matters Results Most routes are coverage • Warner/Pacific routes:will not attract choice and PCH/1st riders • Route 29 is only Disadvantages: 15-minute • ample and mostly free frequency route parking • Hotel staff • combined with high- access income population and important lack of proximity to ' OCTA used to Metrolink stations have more Advantages: service,but has Arterial Grid,intra-OCtrips, r reduced due to bus speed and reliability, low demand and large events/seasonality 9/6/2022 Sustainable Mode Analysis : Circuit On -Demand Microtransit Huntington Beach Service M� �,r�,le .. Hours e o.a. Results _c Your krorn'e eco-trwntty sFuttk servKe�s naw:n NurRinglon Boo:N lbu V 100 ridersper • nth can rowcarcharbe W✓ng ift FOCawrtig Fqurc. ':O\ Average • • 4bntlay:C1aua min iueuxvwea�ewW Spm-apm Ynurwar:tpm,(km ��., sa :, .. qWhy it Matters s aa:,mm-gym y . Circuit shows some promise + to grow d • �. • •• Central hub for project 1B Information and activations hbmobilitv.com ■ Goals ■ Project themes ■ Engagement opportunities • Contact form Response Counts Completion Rate: 81.1% Complete 673 Partial _' ' 157 Totals:830 5 • . 1 Survey Findings (General ) General Results appNI • 673+survey complete responses(to- date) • 93%of respondents live in HB • Other than driving. respondents prefer to access destinations via active transportation 3.Under what age range do you fait? • 81%prefer to bike • 74%prefer to walk • Banning or heavily regulating e-bikes. as one respondent stated. may reduce older adults'mobility options Why it Matters • Strong understanding of broad community consensus for multiple categories Survey Findings (Beach Path) Vatue Percent Responses Beach Path Findings • 60%of respondents use the Beach Path at to 10mph) least once a week Ctearer Marked Access Points&High-Trafficked Areas(I.e. 25.1% 177 73%of respondents believe that separated Stow Zones in HighTrafficked Areas 34.7% 244 paths for bicyclists will improve the path. as well as moving e-mobility devices to PCH Safety Messaging Campaigns 13-8% 83 (38%).and slow zones&walking-only Safety Encouragement Events 87% 61 zones(both had 34%). Safety Education Programs In Schoots 16.9% 119 Mom Signage of Speed Limits jin addition to flashing 10 mph 24.996 175 27%wanted more enforcement/safety Why it Matters • The importance of the Beach Path from a use and network backbone standpoint Moving Rectric and Motorized Vehicles to Pacific Coast 37.8% 266 Highway • Consensus of comfort for all users • Understand community-generated ideas • . 1 Survey Findings Cont. (Beach Path) traveLing greater than 10nnph be attowed to traveL? Beach Path Findings • 81%support speed limits on bike path under 10mph Close split between pedestrian and biking on the Beach Path:37%separated lane on bluff top& beach path,30%separated lane on PCH.21% banned from beach path Vatue Percent Responses • 62%support e-bike registration si.p—ad Lane on the Pacific Coast Highway(PCH) 29.7% 207 -tat,696 SURVEY COMMENTS (Other Improvements to Beach Path ? Need to ticket people not following rules-people are moving way too fast ■ ) Add bike parking and bike lockers Please enforce speed restrictions for ALL types of vehicles on the path Require all a-bike rental shops do safety clinics Eliminate a-bikes on path Put dogs on short leash Remove homeless Cleaner restrooms Don't feed the squirrels Add signalized crosswalks along PCH Replace staircases Children under 16 should not be able to ride an a-bike. They do not know the rules of the road. More signage Educate public on bike safety 9/6/2022 Survey Findings (Bicycle) cycle Network FindingsTop areas for improvements 15.In what ways would you like to see the bicycle network improved? (Please check all that apply] ]s .. • .off-street Improve intersections and crossing50 c More secure bike u parking,Bike concerns of bike thefts zs •like alternate paths besides Beach Path as a commute option Enforcement of speeding motorists along roadways Why it Matters Bicycle use, • areas for . F¢ Aoo improvements ¢o PedestrianSurvey Findings (Pedestrian ) Network Findings 19.In what ways would you like to see the pedestrian network "'areas for ' ' improved?(please check all that apply) Improving existing sidewalk conditions(widt. 50 Improve •n crossingsProvide more trees/s U Concerns of long gaps between stop or signalilzed I Ell I m 25 controlled .Drivers making a red light right when pedestrians �i �`e �a ,� pce �y Qc ,•mac � pc f �J° ��,0 c have right ° y�r ��` a°° °• s�°aca m �s y �• ° c� o. of ��3 a�9 05� -�'� c•ti .8�c d'°o�rFc iy �,dq �Foo\o9m �• `o o` 0yA P� cal o a QetFy � �� °G� Why it Matters Pedestrian use,and areas for improvement to corridors and intersections(typical) A off•P G 8 9/6/2022 Detailed Schedule 2022 May June July August September October November December Advisory . . Meetings Public Meetings Existing Conditions MobilityBeach Path Survey Website Launch Final Report Beach Path Discussion • Bluff Top Project � ; • Separated Paths �! • Radar Feedback signs 'll�� -��4' ,2 P ��HTINCIO 9/6/2022 Questions? 1= 10