The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacific Coast Highway Relinquishment Study 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA City of Huntington Beach 92648 File #: 22-782 MEETING DATE: 10/4/2022 Pacific Coast Highway Relinquishment Study City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 9/28/2022 powerec27y Legistar— TIN N G T 0 �pRPORg Y Huntington City of Huntin ton Beach � TF Relinquishment Exploration Study of Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1 ) Ir C - r r - - - Overview --�" City Council Study Session October 4, 2022 7 B 17 190 1 F � 0 � 0 C P UNTH Background • September 7, 2021 City Council directed the City Manager to conduct a Feasibility Analysis regarding the possible relinquishment of Pacific Coast Highway from Seapoint Street to the City's southern limit. • October 2021 The Public Works Department hired Kreuzer Consulting to prepare an Exploratory Report for the Relinquishment of Pacific Coast Highway. Purpose of Study • Assess potential pros and cons, develop preliminary costs and identify potential liabilities. Definition of Relinquishment The statutory conveyance of all rights, title, interests, liability, and ��NIINGTo maintenance responsibilities of a State highway, or portion thereof, to O� \N�pRPORA,, another government entity. F9 z per" o � NTY �P� Relinquishment Process • Process is lengthy (can take up to 5 years) Chapter 25—R.lirquish—w% Figure 25-2 Figure 25-2 Relinquishment by Legislative Enactment j Relinquishment by Legislative Enactment Opw Pr�,- I—I g—yr<quevs ad><a Ymib m de brat livluishmem ITstr:nemsponaaon plarrang, HQ Tnmpwruoa Ielaeat of Me 3u 7 eYlrtim wit HQ Teafde Pbmm�£a(aaYvee e Oprraaos.prtparts relingoahmer rtlrrlYbhmem bsesraevtrryod sseasvrme report CTC-CwlCara Tungerram Co®riaarn YES pA g _ Dbt 1JO aC Hrbla �DW HQ I7:wiou�ofDea� soon 1<giYaties kwe ag> rtermso ;HQ-Fisaagrutus aB--Y ali hm�^ 1 PShE-Nans-9peclgcaeov..and Ea®see Dstrict Beds letter and proect Dtatirl rigMof-waY OLS-o�xe ofl.md s.n<»rn HQ apptwat documrar d¢ladng DutrierpF�s evprveerl[g prepares C7[ Dhisim otltglred Wryand Rlir{n4hmem 1p be w beat sad e�.p� and xr4tvils R�� L+nd Susvrys Iracfest t>e dre St ate local relrgvishmes telingnKtancm — agercy.DtID,ad OLS agrsearmt pachge'ta OLS ' Akfe1 b rndtT Amedm ax of d><tatlowiag opdmo: �t Daaxial Casuburi®Onh Financial Contribution Only twrntY.erYmera afeae - NO Disaict sends terser ad project Dxtrxt prepares District submits Disticr right-of-wry ap¢m•a/dacavamt d¢tr6v8 ma a<nrts Nada request ro enF—mg prtpams CTC appmw,9navci9 HQ Pwgnm relivquishmem to be is I. ivraex 'ers°`Pr"m"n' PrOQam ®vg and rtbmits comntnaiau only offhe Stme to mr 8aarclal mlivquial-- and relmgrdsbnreut ad OL.S eomribmiun mly paa ge'ro OLS (tD CTC tea I a—Bled In co—Ymly fbab recorde/a a[�a local.e ;Capital Project O 4' NO Dieter to read.-e � �--N C2C rsuee and .e+16mr Data.prtpare Dsricramds letter and F9en rtlin9vidmess Dstrict prepares t.rNon docrmr<m decbrire ape®ent protect approaal Execvse Dnaxt Disaxr rrghr-. Program C.0 ap q— a —fi— earogi=%ml pepares and CTC appmaeu rrelivquisivnmr ro be iv beat datwenr.I5@.E and retivqushmes YE r t of the Srat b local �t`m avbvutr fiords request agreemepr �� brrLts relinquishment linquishmem �ageul•�_1®rOD.and OLS to HQ Prograrrmrmg o oetract pacbg<to OLS CLytr 6"Rir4r otWry the FH W A te.ea and approsN Ealbwag Anirle a"Esxrtrl Pmudvr'is recedes fm ttr sitvatmvs idmti6ed as Awiehe J'Toliis- �\ YESa{fTC resolmioa died in \�tY rccardeYx oPSrc� Project Develop—,Procedawes M-1 02'13!2018A 25-37 A 0 1 � . • • no • won Ul . • • • .I - • "` V,.'''`{ a'�.> *k,.sjtil ti,\: ,,�` ,` 3. l• ,t., t ° •*,} ¢ ,, -� a Y`. # i w � �. �, z ;. � ��•�disone ign,r�ch�ol s� ,,�.,��.• l ��e�^'.,-fs'" „7e,��§� � S, i� 1 �-�'r '�'�� ,�';^ '�'�`�. t� t 1 v j �♦` °,.�?S .*` � •.•'�. c �.•�- za' �s_ •.�,.� ,1 li a - � ,;_ t t} x .'"{ r�lt. . �, �`'' ��. �, ti rr'� ��`ti� ".�.. ,/ �,�,T � b�` '��i _ �+�.��.:.. ..,,i.,,,,:7 ;� �•, " ti.J `�x��` 4i A a '` �Y��i � �OAf J��t` f � •• ,f�f � HunUngt'on,,Beach 1 `4`yi e r Ei rt Atjj. ' rep f,,,*^,�� Th. •atE-'t cn Lieach .esort'�'A"Hdlon �- •..rs' ` ", �«�� i i Relinquishment Considerations Common motivations for relinquishment ❑ Changing street function - ❑ Street design flexibility ❑ Streetscape design features ❑ Control over traffic management 4 - ❑ Length of permit process � .y , Cautions of relinquishment ❑ Operations and maintenance costs ❑ Staffing resources and costs �PNGr°�� ❑ Potential liability costs CF FFB l7. 1904.P��\t�OQ ��UNTY CP Pacific Coast Highway - Current Situation Divided into 3 segments • Segment 1 : Seapoint St. to Goldenwest St. • 2 lanes in each direction, 55 mph speed limit, no on-street parking • Segment 2: Goldenwest St. to Beach Blvd. • Generally 2 lanes in each direction, 40-45 mph speed limit, on-street parking • Segment 3: Beach Blvd to Southern City Limit • 3 lanes in each direction, 55 mph, no on-street parking • Inventory taken into account for determining Cost Considerations: ADA Compliance, Curb Access Ramps, Curbs and Gutters, Drainage INGTo Facilities, Driveways, Landscaping, Medians, Pavement Striping, o� ,NGORPORgjFo ��F Sidewalks, Street Lighting 9 ��W CPS. Cost Considerations Segment Segment Segment Cost to bring PCH to a "State of good $0 $710,000 $2.8M $3.4M repair" Bring PCH up to City standards $6.5M $5.1M $14.8M $24M Operations and Maintenance $340,000 $720,000 $1.34M $2.4M Potential Future Enhancements $60M <<.. NT 1 NGT0 Q` \N,�RPORAj •�� U X cF��NTY CP\�Q Liability Considerations . . . . Claims/Settlements* $9.5M Legal Expenses* $1.5M Total $11M *These figures were derived from a recent study by the City of Laguna Beach for Relinquishment of Laguna Canyon Road Accidents (estimated damaged property value - $24M) %T I NG,,O \NIORPORAIFD V U = < ��NTY CP Questions ? tv '.:. a� O� \�ppPPORATE� U CD Q "vn� 49, v �GUNTY �P� TIN N G T 0 . Cityof Huntington Beach C3RPORAT g ---- --- - - - - -_ .� Relinquishment Exploration Study of C Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1 ) Overview City Council Study Session o . October 4, 2022 fie. 11 1909 P� F � o P c UNTH SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION 1 Meeft Date: IDIYZ2I_z Agenda Item No.: J (22-- ��'z Background • September 7, 2021 Council directed conducting a Feasibility Analysis regarding relinquishment of Pacific Coast Highway (Seapoint Ave to south city limit) • October 2021 City hired Kreuzer Consulting to prepare a Exploratory Report for the Relinquishment of Pacific Coast Highway. Purpose of Study HISTORIC PCH/MAIN • To provide information regarding the pros, cons, and process for relinquishment. Study to developpreliminary costs and liability ��NTPORA 41t� -1 l p J J Off( \N�pRPORATFO V Definition of Relinquishment • The statutory conveyance of all rights, title, interests, liability, and maintenance responsibilities of a State highway, or portion thereof, to v2cF FFB „ 190, another government entity. NTY CPS. Relinquishment Process • Process is lengthy (can take up to 5 years) C'ltnp—25-Relirlcluislunews Fig—25-2 Figure 25-2 Relinquishment by Legislative Enactment 'Relinquishment by Legislative Enacnnent O oppna< P««ern legislation CevDict ResoW Process Calram ini,ia,es or / Is the relmquisha,en[�� N�� local aBeacy req,uxa ` sad us liuuts is tlr tsest relinqubhmtmt Dam'ttas,�m Huh HQPIaoaY. R%T�g�tw¢ \ test d the Stale? c Operaaom,Pr•Pasea rtlinlxcdnem I rtlugnulaaevt assnamen,repan .+esamevt rtPat YES ;I:TC-GIJQi•Tm+Poradim Co+mmiav I FHWA-Fedesd}I:ahwey Ad®ava•am NO Cost muar:<,w o"-..t abvxr D,an pne• i DOD-HQ u�,,:o.a ofDe,;H, r�°`� 1e1b�K� hpslatize wdhlocal alpee ro terms o �11Q_ltwd.Par,uz rtalmb deletim aeeocv liaqubhmem^ PSA6-A•vc 4sae<:firanow.avd Ertmaae Dbrict amds lettr aad ptaject Q alsPwaldmumnrt daclartog DbrirtpnPrea mgrnecbgP Paces Da-nsm fRgh,d WryaM telrtrqubhmN to 1s is beat ad eacattn aad xvbrntb Load 9rw•y+ macrest dale State b local rtliatvuhmem religgutslmeM - ------- gercy.DOD.and OLS agr.asen, Paclrage�to OLS - � 17:+�b.rsdve Anoed•ro ex dtla taaowintt apum•� Wmir 19aeb1 Caedlsaum Ov1y Financial Contribution Only ere re.a.aaa°led" c.pte lsy« ematy teenwwa wee NO Dbrtct surds lettr and projM DYria PrePa,•a Dstrict a,drmits Dbvict right-of-vay approval docgmmt deelaeag esmua Prada reguex ro enpno ft Prepares CTC approaea flaacial reli.quishmem to be is bex iataex 'm'^'P'iz�`nr RORam HQ PmBtammigt and tobmits eosnbrmn mly ofthe S_ td bcal ag_7.DOD atlw•nsmt Pr^Mt br dnaxial relitqubhmm aad Mmgrmshmmt and OLS embibmim mly patbge to OLS (tD CTC readutioa Catl tra�tlo 6aaaeial Sled mcoumyCapital Project e<nmera dm« low IMattb bsardw I �- N CIC ia�u�d wasiasit Defier Prtpeees Dseict smdc letter ao4 projM ntimn"•b'^� Dario prepares ti,tim doe,®eM declaring 'g'e`^"a� Protect approaal ESectae Dbtlet Dsvict rtight-oP-way telioqualmrem to be m best Program dac,ment.PS@E and relmquislavenl CTC appeaea Y8 admidaten eamgiuesing prepares and CTC approve 1 dthe Stat b local Proj<ct suDmia flrndc regrrezt aBseemmt tegmb rnutlttRim bmib relinquiahmm rolimuahn BenNPI90D,and OLS to HQ ProgammmB eoalrac Pacbge'to OI.S (1y,nd-lLlAt ofls.'a�- the FH WA seaiew and appwvd Salbxmg An+:le 1"Essev,W Pmcedsrea"is seeded frt the+imatmvs:dmnfled o Anne J'Tolicisa.' '\ CTC resolution t1letl in Y73 «tdy recordeYs office� � 3 Project Des-eloy—a Procedrtres Mansur] 02.13.2018A 25-37 A .i a r1� ��, i `- ., �• `;� �•,�c ,� a,� ,:� rl°.' �sl Y.' ��"' ;� �' & t��'' $, w��disona igh Sc ool � �F.+ � -.. �� tt, ssl`+-�c: �i�{r•�9i ;e, � ,..,x �, _ ��r'yt �.y .Y j � ��: '� 'i -'b. a� ,/�":.; � ��.j .f• �� t s°3 Sit w', � 2,.• ~° � ,` r,#a ro .. µ - �. � Kit"•.. ., ., �, Hu ntf rigion Beac ��'a''� ` : F�J �`�'�...Y�� ""� e' � "s-`�' £'"'d.�t �`,'�� g'a 1 Yaate�fron;,8eac Res-,, lit ae • � ' i r� ' t Relinquishment Considerations Common motivations for relinquishment ❑ Changing street function ` ' F ❑ Street design flexibility 4 ❑ Streetscape design features ❑ Control over traffic management - 4 - .. ❑ Length of permit process _ _v Cautions of relinquishment ❑ Operations and maintenance costs t"��NTINGTo ❑ Staffing resources and costs O` \NOORPCRA?", 41 ❑ Potential liability costs Pacific Coast Highway - Current Situation Divided into 3 segments • Segment 1 : Seapoint to Goldenwest • 2 lanes in each direction, 55 mph speed limit, no onstreet parking • Segment 2: Goldenwest to Beach Blvd • Generally 2 lanes in each direction, 40-45 mph speed limit, onstreet parking • Segment 3: Beach Blvd to South City Limit • 3 lanes in each direction, 55 mph, no onstreet parking • Inventory taken into account for determining Cost Considerations: Street Pavement, Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk, Driveways, Curb Access Ramps, ADA Compliance, Landscaping, Medians, Traffic Signals, Traffic Signage o t Striping, Street Lighting, and Drainage facilities O\ \NOORPORA,1 U _ ��CjL FB 17, js0 ��UNTY �P� Cost Considerations Segment---- Segment Segment pa 1 1, -A&� Cost to bring PCH to a "State of good $OM $.71M $2.8M $3.4M repair" Bring PCH up to City standards $6.5M $5.1M $14.8M $24M Operations and Maintenance $340k $720k $1.34M $2.4M (Annual Cost) <<,,AUNT I N PTOA' Q` ,,,,r ORgTFo 4Y� Potential Future Enhancements $60M U � FFB 17, t909,P� �Q� cF��UNTY CPS\ Liability Considerations Liability Considerations Accidents $24M Claims/Settlements* $9.5M Legal Expenses* $1.5M Total $35M * - These figures were derived from a recent study by the City of Laguna Beach for the ��NTINGTp Relinquishment of Laguna Canyon Road ttRPORAT 0 'k. v. 9/30/2022 vNT I N GTO \�ppRPORgTFO �/ City of Huntington Beach -''— Relinquishment Exploration Study of Pacific Coast Highway (SR-1) = Overview City Council Study Session October 4, 2022 B. 17. 190g, P `� C�UNTY Background • September 7, 2021 City Council directed the City Manager to conduct a Feasibility Analysis regarding the possible relinquishment of Pacific Coast Highway from Seapoint Street to the City's southern limit. • October 2021 The Public Works Department hired Kreuzer Consulting to prepare an Exploratory Report for the Relinquishment of Pacific Coast Highway. Purpose of Study • Assess potential pros and cons, develop preliminary costs and identify potential liabilities. Definition of Relinquishment The statutory conveyance of all rights, title, interests, liability, and �NTINGj maintenance responsibilities of a State highway, or portion thereof, to o��•OpppRq)f�ti� another government entity. ca�• 92cF00UNTV CP�\�oQ SUPPLE z COMMUNICATION 1 Agenda rim No.•�� _� �ad 20a 9/30/2022 Relinquishment Process • Process is lengthy (can take up to 5 years) E�ea.e n-z Aetluq^Is4m<n�pp Leebla�lve Enac�.neut jµ� q isbma IY� s1a�iW*Ycauw� wa.•. ^ ZZ vu.,r I Capual PcoJecr C �"'�'�,> �K�� -_`��• ao �, 3 STUDY AREA • Seapoint Street to Southern City Limit (approximately 5.6 miles) r. r x TING O� �cavoe,lrio�'� c:a F9i o OQ C�UNTV Pt a 2 9/30/2022 Relinquishment Considerations Common motivations for relinquishment ❑ Changing street function ❑ Street design flexibility ❑ Streetscape design features ❑ Control over traffic management - ❑ Length of permit process _ ----� Cautions of relinquishment ❑ Operations and maintenance costs ��1TINGT ❑ Staffing resources and costs xp_o<,F ore ❑ Potential liability costs F9= V( �UUNTY Pacific Coast Highway — Current Situation Divided into 3 segments • Segment 1: Seapoint St. to Goldenwest St. • 2 lanes in each direction, 55 mph speed limit, no on-street parking • Segment 2: Goldenwest St. to Beach Blvd. • Generally 2 lanes in each direction, 40-45 mph speed limit, on-street parking • Segment 3: Beach Blvd to Southern City Limit • 3 lanes in each direction, 55 mph, no on-street parking • Inventory taken into account for determining Cost Considerations: ADA Compliance, Curb Access Ramps, Curbs and Gutters, Drainage TINGT Facilities, Driveways, Landscaping, Medians, Pavement Striping, o� NOM94,f oti� Sidewalks, Street Lighting F9= F�UUNTY GPI\ 6 3 9/30/2022 Cost Considerations Cost to bring PCH to a"State of good $.6M $1.5M $3.5M $5.61v1 repair" Bring PCH up to City standards $5.9M $4.OM $14.1M $24M Operations and Maintenance $12.8M $23.6M $23.6M $60M Potential Future Enhancements $60M ( \\NT I NGTO Ol \N(911i0NglFq�4:p U 2 "Yj fe 11 1909. UNTv CPS\ 7 Liability Considerations Potential Costs(Annual) Accidents $24M Claims/Settlements* $9.51VI Legal Expenses* $1.5M Total $35M *These figures were derived from a recent study by the City of Laguna Beach for Relinquishment of Laguna Canyon Road TINGT Q` `N�O.IORgTf o•� i F UNTV CP\�oe 4 9/30/2022 Questions? su"� O` \y�ORP0a1tF� �n h F�UUNTY CP�� 5