Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHousing Element ��TiNGTo 2000 Main Street, ,K ` Huntington Beach,CA • City of Huntington Beach 92648 a. 8_7 4‘ii& File #: 22-906 MEETING DATE: 11/1/2022 Subject: Housing Element 1. Staff Report 2. Councilmember Questions 3. Public Comments regarding Study Session Item 4. Councilmember Wrap-up Comments City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/28/2022 powered14 Leg istarT" CD I- Cl) CU c 0 .....-z 0) "0 7)° Cl) N N ill MNDo „ „) c Cn 45 :1?--N O 2 T— .... C =U 0 u) N 0 .- = > U - o MIC) ° ° U . 0 U z , U 0_ . O) o � NM w /�//I.r►i�► H bCii P/ •. 0° ••••• -: ' 1 i 'i s\!ei*.• *11\ $ ° oN .. 1 i -' ' 1( 11 *"! 1) .4).• ,If‘,. 3 f „ of0 I 1 iiiT' 440 ill : N'I )..Q2. c, i C7Lam' ig, r0 er_ • o , { 1 r • 'N1-" . • oI , I . • Z • 1 ri (5 i� • S w •0 ki r.; "! aS ^n c _ 't�F. { - a) 4-• CU V O. M c cco p c o c > o a) . +� .--, E . -0 ,6p O co Cl) .O cy) c U Q 0 O > c a) 0 c L Q w (13 N c o O WE 0_ a) ca } -0 0) • (/) 0 . .E . O I • 4 , /,�iii..�- v CU 2 2 ‘a ii/ 0 .... tiff V 46/ ,, ....:*,‘ O0 Q) L N I c�:Q e —i •mW tL0 aJ �-'vi 1 Z S 2 ,Y. —'f Om O O +� -0 � \ y 1� Ci III til 0 O ° o E c v �...,/ i au E v au cC - wLrl c rts Q c a110 w O N = 0 I mia Om U a Cl) cts x— c It 0 7-13. 0) V .,- c c *k CI O W N L. 'N c c � W � � a. co +� N c O a) (n N O 0 N 0 _. >, Q) 2 C Q > •= _ N �+ Oc2 c0 — .p O , .V p a) 0 cu N O u- No W "' ca N 73 0 � U . N N >, E0 Qo 0 . . - o 0 O O • (• • 0)0) U) N O S N O c •c m i N (Ni 1 N O N _C O L N N _c N N > N Q O O CK5 Lo -u N v E . — •O N m = = LL N 0) N N • • • • • • • • i c o a, N AO g�p,CN b/Nd C c cu w d N. e) .N i N 04 C;,;Q LJ \ O CI) O o p .co E c 2 Alto i/� ■ cn aJ aJ a) w +� _ 111 C � Q � CLO � Q w •N a-+ O. 2 0 N 0 2 ♦♦ V++ -0 - C C a > aa)i v, as 0 OS o °� ° > a) L- = a) O O L c i m a) Cn U La) o a E �.) L- C) O -o : U il L C o ° N aD � � .O O z W oUL 0_ n , 0- -0 .LLo _ o a o C L 0 a) ' a) CD Oa) - "- Cr -o a) C al N 1 a) -0 a) a) ' LL U) a.. — s_ U) II = a) a)0 (n a) LLI E co .,°` 1 d�. /� . . L CO a) 't so. LLI W C.) 2 � C 'O a) 1 N oer — U� a o - a)V °) U)a) � o mlima E ... o 7:3 ,._, .. E .—> 0 a) C N _c C W z° � v) � o "! > a) OE N +•� ap = N NO Q Q N (15 5 > € C Nam. O N I N a) O > L —_ •� L � N C _0 0) � v O O a) C - N O N E a) U Q) �- N E N CD .4., eli O — a) cl +-• (n Q U Q 3 C O 5 a) a) .5 a) a) = OW Q U —) (n 2 � > . . i i a. 1 ham:a •"" \ \ •Q 1 a ,; "0- 1 \ -of 1 i z 1 _ +,f11i ovi,#il N 0 "%ii/ 0 o 0 CO 0_ _ _ E O - O o i !/) y. C O a) u) O +•+ CD d) — W Co v C CD 0) C O _ 0cn ■— D - •Q co a' i"il =O c z CU O E N O) -�-' V o E w U co U T N + c C N ■— a) E c Q co E t (a U N =O .—a) 73 E .71 G o = IVCoQzU) o 73 3 _ � CD oa a) vG�pMz4'T v4 •_ 0, , , . . * o. a CD 1- N a) c O Q N ■� O _c E E O > C O N a) CD E a w co Ce0) cn CI CD (...) -— .— i o U a) o U a) m w 1 I I I- U 1 co �1y, 1 �.Q I ' t �,v \ rho :fir :zk C� ar tm 4J C E "0 E +• O c co (6 U - a) 0 cu �' _ CO - v) c as p a Elam roro -0 ° a) I. a) a) ■� a) O1 •W •C •RI W (/) C• L I N ■Vt C � CD 0 D a)O _0 N n O = -0 co a) O '— a--' — S.... i _ co = O .I-'V a) E (a c Q U -.-, M Q 0 a) -o co V u C 2 O O = m Q 4.1111. N ,D N N . -. �- L.L. o (O _co N = fin O a) I— u L L ■II= 0 0 D CI C O 4- ti ?:. a) E - -' C = Q) = _ c (6 vi CO � u E a)a) ,_ — 4_ 0 0 N W W .e u _1 a C O cn C 0 U _O tiA Q _C Q 'cn z M I o CC N U � (n a)imr +-1 v > a) a) _c U N •— I v a) N 0 cu co cu _ o C 0 u +, O N •— O cn aA O u a) V — U C (B C .2 N = co ♦+ IC Li- cn 4) 0 I (7:5 %._ +� ago Ncu E Ci= 0_ no co W elD — .� CCU Nim •- N N •- C IJJ O 0 Lu 4— 0 E a) -o O0:5 O aA ro 0 ra ca 0 .471 U L ■� 0 0_ +, - +-' Li)" coin N 0 w W •U 0_ O - - 0 TD d\-- �c�H b/ " 1, c.DrQ ' 2.'v z "• b •••�c, , • 1' /3 'p'0, ti i Q1 0° o° o o (-1 CO LO Q) T-1 O1 O N M N. r.^ a) , ■..., in o LD o o Lo o. ,, O O M N Lt 1 I (n r-I N.a) _c>. xl, >. _. > 13° 0¢ O AtA�e; v WF 2 0 (iv! O o cr.'" O o NIx;. •--I 1� O N a C 1 N 00 O lO ell Lf'1 a); O I (11) ra 13 o II sl MEC CU 0. us Gi) IS x10 O O 0 CD Y u _T ci1/1 S� ul a O v E z � c j O-I) Li- x N Ln 0 Z 13 = 2 (1) "0 0 x i L £ O C 0 = o m s 0 v v x L ai EN L',- vvi a s a v o o O a z x ° Z 0/1g. ....,, by y .N 1 ��i o i ` e os, �\ 1 Q pug I o;T ik z2 \ 0 Al CIL Z...'-. . 'i 4' 1. .: 1 o -0 o 0 0 c rc t \ \ o 0 0 O N Ql 1p 00 111 I I I p ~ 0 cr CV O n M a MO c 0 v O c c O CU 0 00;is. 0 > ra V O 5 i I L I I I v N W Z L 0 rn o o •o m O C c d D_ U v E ti - O F N MEM C.` N N �... N N C 3.. V1 0 0 0 0 C N H p ti- bA �� 2' C - L 0 _c t 0 c c - C O O V) N N cn N Q) O O z 1 t �, L (1, 0 o a 0 0 0 is) a, a, : CU _ = o I I I n_ a. CO all) 3 O' O 0 M O N N l0 O i.r CCO > co 00 I� -I l0 M r:s s 47- LA' M 00 Lr M N -c) ru i �` 6 v .. O' L v, CO cu . , ,.. O E 0 o v (Q = v) v rq s 3 CUCL of MI O > .� N N to 4J CU w j CIS 00 Q �` Q 73 "c m` c 'c • CO 1:5 O O O 3 V IA TY v N O lfl O 'a `^ °' o ry • n Mt) JO LA 0 O CU + L = L +>+ C + O O -0L.. Vj v '' 3 r i C - S O CU Y 0 — a; a) N L_n QJ r0 t >— +- 8 "' O Z N C O U O mc a v rcS O N 'O 0 4J C d E a u_ ++ Q O Li;) C E c Q. 3 c O C c 3 = i • o' c INC u V1 a j to .c aJ GJ GJ * i O J 3 0 N f0 fTs O J 0 N v o Y t �, v+ _ a a s o a� E i o y' dA _c !]A ttA O L Q' uis; w E 41 L L I- tip (� O L 0 7 L 2 I 0 N 0. -.) 0. N cn I >. a u cu �.. I v°� * .-i 0 I 01 � p , AO C.D •4 \ b• . ` •4 m:Y +r v�l 4�13 0%'',11 C M 0 V N O a) ; � : an � 0 c > a o cNi as ai Sm _o o .0 o CD CD = o O o 0 o = " E N �O 01 C CD as= �O p ` , u1 Q nj ` 0)c ,--1 c co_ d' /} mm iN = M (6 O O (O UI) ooIQ ao cua) rIcs Q- = ' coc _ � co cp_ L v IA- -6 (n O co O O 0 6) s E __ � ' O aC C _c _ O JLf1 g io vc a) >. 0 I a • E .., . re, > _ ..._ LID in in c o CO N u -§ O (B L a) O _ __ °' W � a> ca o o N Y U� G1 o a + N o mom L Q W O VI -I N U c J oo N as N M V °' a - _ N N cA C as -p Cu O i E r-I N 0 w 2 ° ' N z . cu _ O a N LP) O LP) m 1--1 %-1 I, N 0 lD N 00 N N c-I c-I 0 0 VD 0 Cr m N m N 0 LP) r-1 0 N .--1 c-1 CO 01 0 Ch 00 .--I CO N 01 N r1 N 0 ci d' 0 lD c-1 N LD lD LD N L-) 4 ci .-i O 00 CO N. N. LC 01 N c i Ol lD V O (. LP) N 00 N LD -1 N N 00 LP) V 4 N m - o Cl CI CO CO N LC VD In I f) LP) If) Cl- CO CO CO CO CO CO .-I .--1 1-1 IA. if} V} V} V} V} if). in. in- if} if} i/} V} if} i/} in. V} V} V} CD > V} O `° To CM N. 6 - O o U 0 N 12 _ N p v M - C 3 C = o ,_ 0 Oco U 1v = a aJ C O.'N o 0 = — a= a�c 0 -0 O ra a1a cu eL co a EQ = O . 0a a co 0= _ c ia r CON .co_ 0A1/ > >Q .Q c O LaV J OJ •Y no y Q1 = N • = 0) 0) a. 00 D VI a-, 1-00 O1 O C YO co (L LT: i cu cc aLLW • = a ° wN c Ea c0 ao - 3 ._ coa - a = c CD N U ? of no .O 4! i +'' , ++ 0 110 00 CO co %- To d v '~ 3 a i O O 2 w i = (a N v 0 o J I J CO W - ♦ • a m w I a LL O) (In CU CO /1 I 0 0 CM Cr) CU O =,re C O (a N � � N � o aja) Cl)E .._, - Cn a) i 73 0 CD Sr.. ^ Cn a) (t, N C (a S. N U U C N C E C ci9 L . ., .c, o (� to (/� U +r N (a O C_ •- \ •— c (n c O C o 't -0 c- C N 0— " ) cN UO CO CI) C — II 0 = a)0 `� c '— cam cip •— Ap o Q W CL — -0 U 0- E (a Ce 2 < (a ( LL N .00 .. E E a) U11111 ~ / /' 411...... I F,..,•............. . ` 0 g $ • •; O • 6- z.� ":►- _4.//3 phi;ii N N CO c) .L N CO o E . - _Caa) = N -O = Cl) e- CO E 4o O c c C 3 N U � Q U) +r - E - O i O p N C 4- 0 > O = a) M O c a) L a) -2 o 0 -o lime ci) (n II; U 0 U Ili }, O c G 0 2 = c a5 TD 15 in H COco ~ c � _� o � � C 01) C (I) N co o O = U o � o LL To a C ..c o > E as > = ■.... coo p c �' co o) c O o >, -Fsco .- 0 0 N O c= c al 4° E c o = O " mot o O '- c O �--' > N x O C F �o # Pc \ biN1 c, ' ,-\-1W. I 1.--- .0', ' „ 't.— \ :q r:r .6 FF a) 0y., %� /� — �4.03 0�/,��� LA 107k#6-'7. - OitLr, , , .. < Iv- - I 1. c -.. , 4441.11 ..„4„...410:147,,, rY a) iFiir, kir— .... 15:::„ _ a) ,1, , Z , N o (..) ( a) (13 u V N m CO (13 o W (-_:0O O1 ) 03 C ca I I O Q o .c o c � O C via CD U L �O 73 to c 0 a� - E - cn � — o a) a ^' T /` to U O a) -la' 0) i ♦ _ N w N a) C o L E (V N s O a) L 1 0 CD C O M - oNQ _C •� -� 0 , ,., - . -. ,•!,;d.,.'!•4.1,4 ,:r.4,,, .;-.4,, ,I . - ' / , f, ,-.-.'-.•, -!„.4-4.',1q! ;t,•,. •••''.',?`:1,A•• • .s..,, :,•',••.;A ..-:;••-,,.•,:, ,7, l_--7_,--, '1 2:,.. Zf'-'.,,, ,' . ( i. ' .!;'-•':..1` ;' ---1 .,,..,, - ,.. - ,„;,... ,;.-..1 .,,,,,'„,,,,,i,:,-,.--:,;,-.-,-;;Afr• e -4-.,;.4'. "..r. 4-'''".!--.."4`till ; CC) . ,•,,•;., , , ,• .- , _,.... .-.„ .-,,r... , :,,,'• ,, !,t;-.,,,,,..,,,, , , q....s.-•- :.' 2- - i I ...,'!..lif••••,, '• , I '4..•••"•'4: • "; .. ' •..*,, -. . .... . • • ,t,,- ---r• . -4.,4... ,t_.. C: '•',;.' I - - ' . :;•;.;- . If. 'L: .1''.:..'"Ii':7:_.,..•- : • 1 *._" - ,,, , , „. ,...,i. . ;,,7.!.....,' ',:,•,." - i I , ..: . ,.. - ,-e'LiS:,9.% • 4 .I • • ; f . . -::••,4;5:- I-,. i ' •1., ! -- .' ' J DI) i.-,4,:,_.• . e •:-. • .. ,:i.,,.L...,:4.....„..,.7 -,., ." ...•• .4,1e4;,...:74,,.........7.../._ ,,,,.,,,,;.,,,,,:C i.,, II - ;- , -1';-•,"- (1) - . 1 ,I . .. : 1 0 ii,t . N _ ., , _ . ' - I-, ...,„,, 74,. , Ir.- i , 4 ,t • j,,,, 4, ,•,,, I 4) MINIM .C1 03 . ., \ ..... , .. I ' — . •- ;"_-,I;•:a1p t il.r,e ",.. i-i•i.•i, 1 - ' - -.-d.-14 *I .„ , , i m ,\ 1 7: ///l// - II/1 -i ,„_ / . VI — I . I IJI • i f , ,'-,.•,.-2•' ':5,-,'.;,•t-A.-.f,,-:.„.4'',)..,.i',,7'.-.:,''"--:-[.,i.-../iK..' ..l.:,.,.._1,‘;,,-,,,•'v,,•.,-,i7..,,,.-,.t,,.-7,-.i---i.,-...l 4.T-. -:4 ,.: .i... .;. .'. ,,,, - .: .. • -;.--.;...--_, -.,-.---.,\,,, .....,:, - -• -, ..iii,a,... , ;•-_ ,,?,,-1.',...-;,,,N,, .. .. ,. . _, . . Am. ./ _ ' ‘ :? -,-t. ;'''":".., ,' V-':-•*4.-74t.;', --'4.-...''''''----.-' ':'''-'-',.›.,,,, .., -, \ %.:: ''''--4;(•,-44‘1),.. ..''''-ft.:- ' , ..„,.•,,,,....i '...,`'llit,'. '''itt.‘i.'.. .! MC ,, 2.. on mi. Irk! —1. 4.' t y , It W. ' ' ' e— ' .1 — .11i i: />- ..0• .y :a) c —0 w �' I v0p ‘t I it\ I:7i i ilL A , 1 :11 I*'''''° .4,4, flo, ' -1--J a) , „. —.----=, it._ i . . . t\ ,im, 1 s ., O 3 CO {`� C v p ; ■— O t 1tii anal 1111 .MCC I __ O I r h C 11110 1111 111411C � „ E * f •b. 1 1 L isa � i Cl) ■_ t \ ,011 -i n ...... ..Er,-,../ C13 nu* ti, . I a y II4 • ��PtH b/Nb lik o• C:]k- 1 of T; 2 ' , . • r • vl ‘ y ,t . ' < ''.-j•Ii3 Qi* il L ._ 45 _ C Id Cn -0 o cts a) I E o oU co co al cv L. C O V C `v co a_ cn N .O L HI cn O �_O LL O U cA < U O 0 o L —,}, U L N N 00. C N = 4) O = co CO ii2 •0 NO U a) EC > = •a_.. L. _ .0 •� 4— Q) m 0 u_ O U 0_.(1) ��P�H 6• b�N/ '• a- o. 1 z'2 a ; ~ GIsi ;fz< %I. MO 00\/#1 eximo, cn 0 .� : o ocn = = E U 0 O 0 O c -aU • p u' N _ _ a- > vi O (6 .0 J a) c a)L. a E mj ai >, a) _c o _ •— c cm a.., � . u� _ �O _ O N 0 0 C C 0) U 0_ 0 a) o) cn 0 0 :4= cic5 w CC -— a) 2 I (4) 7 O m (Ti C > -0 -0 O o cn o >, (3 a) a) ( _o ) n = — F o Co}p= cn co cn cn '( _c CI3 L/3 ' >, • f) C � � C o o m 0 CD cn v= ca0 ° ` Oc ° o ID LL U co a "- ( _ Q Q U (2 (T2 0) V ° (D E co 0 E : 7U " °Q o -E-_- -t a) ,...(4 .c (> a) e E +r Q 0 ._ -- E aa) 2ooc' U U O 7) . . . . � — Q • 0 0 i1 P N it gF,••,,•..........'by O • yam. O • oa6 \ 1 .2 �'• 1- '•.• may ' j .i ' V i C N _ O Toc - N a) 2 S To O a) c0. a) _c E 7 U (a O cO - ( a)E -t 8 C a) al a) O a) O N (u c O E CO O � = "C _N C ' O E L O .R cn a) C � c - L - co O C O = ti) 73 (1)N `� V V O - Q U O o co O a) C ) O >, E 0 -0 70 a) N L U) 0 73 O a) c },cm ami — O CO O w E O C 0) u Oa 2 % N � � C C a) O C Q �O C to a) c N U N Q (u E Z O O O a) = 'i - - E 5 a C -� CU— Q O c O .3 � ( - - in' oN_ U' a_ = � a) To N _= N O >+ O C -0 Cl eh = .N O -0 0 U — n "0 U 0 L 0 C co E - N O O CO .L C C) U C O a) CO C +� 13 C a) - (ts Ec c E C)) i ai E 2 a) a) (6 a) u) O Q (6 O O -t •_ h 2 OO cA O cn 4—L > 0_ a) L O N >' _ c a)13 E c cm N C N Ncl- >_ E4 (6 -0 -0 O >> O O O >CD E E O (13 o p N QWsO OQOC w al (n N— N co 4 6 CO N 00 6 /N - 0' CD Al � . . p E .- 1 ,'i j' �.. 1 O Z c O ; Sa H ) .a S Z tk CL to O — E \ '] % t'i 4�`111 G = E ci co w Q ..P.a......- ar, C7 CT a) -C3 — Z 2 co co si c 2 c QU k.o .,, Q ZcoCt N +, (B C _ ,� a1 4 CeCIA • ci) L = u 2 IV p U cm CD a) ct I a) 0 N At Z Q g ._ c cr) ai D c a) L S 0 z - �--+ +• ' O Z ) Q 11i00 (7 .U) U U 0 LU a) a) Li)O a) 0 = i , CO a) CD _C -0 0 C CC II a) o E a) 0 v ■� }' _ 0) I EK . 0 0 N QO• + N N N In ZO ZD = = '• E c-I CO Ln 00 i Q = up 00 Om N M z O M N (-Ni 'A M Ce 2 2 cc v t--i .. O d' Q) • h DO N 4 ~ O a) c co tiA M = c W c `� 1• ce r_i T_I QT_I C N I� O I � O � O N th c-I c-I i!} tn- ■- uy 2 2 LL Am. o E o o 0 00 N O O L() `I NJ n 44- O Ln 00 I o 0 CD N O N o to cu U I a+ _C U O O v E o coN O U L %I'm o c � coo NO U 2 CDJ : ai (A)N > ° Co Lo• c LU N- r 1- D co - O � E wa, o LI III >11 cu Cu COca E N m. o W00 C L a) CO0 0 J c) _ N L N O Q Co O Z p = co I Va) c = M Ce , a) c Q 'a z c I 4.0 0 Ce C tY Q 0. Q 1 0 1- Ce W II c,H b/ � v \ Nay%.. ! ' i ,k, =v1 4.t/3 p%�-i/ .„- E I- L cm a)a) O Q E . ._ 0 73 (10 O O �1N IM c L O O N an 0) U O O ti `- O Q U L >+ NII 1Et Om CD NCD a) -c L C c) (0) Z N C a) LL C T, co +, E C Arne a) = o o N ■ E N Q) U R3 (f) c cr L N _>+ C -0 L. CDN II -0N = c) G) L. N > CO N _ /�U O OU N X = a)♦ i—' +—+ C -0 a) U) = ..?:: 0 z CD CD CD Q Cr O ° � Qg 8 73 :"6 o .- 0 >, ,:, a) "CiW o o Z . 0 2, al cn 13 2 = .5 114( CT 4) 0 2 � tH b/N� /1 I ilk :•mil ;e4' O1 z y• `•. I' ''k , ' . , 1 I C Ce 4E4 E c6 CDO ui 2 O Oa) cA > 4C7) 4- O Mr C TD =''''./ -0 c O >+ o a) U O .Q 0a) cu 2 - O c6 N 'co— o L CO N ct a) Cti E = 0 as E O U U co V U O C C • U 2) o p OZQ 06 U (/) Q O ON O= o U N — N �' CD ) O .�E E co • i3 N co co co (lS to C 0 — += O X O N C N L cA U O N 'C U - • N (N) 2 le) a) co O _ 7 'X .0 1'2 cmuj O > > N N C N J C (0) C O U O N C = N U {-' C O •o O C LL c a -CZ O N zp c� +rQ coLL + O p Z ti N C V- c p QQ p " 0 0 O cn C N N % co ..>, C 0 co Z N o I - p N. N co (n — (5 o — E U E C) E cM p 0 O O `F CO Cu) c N • • . Cfl 0_ U .- Q O O < (I) c m CO (Z > Q a) . vjma a--' a-- ■_ (i) 4 • (75 • • �� ir ��p,CH VI Nd 1 , a 1C.D:Q 1 � �.;...............' w .• 11 �1 13 O%"iii C N CO 0 a) >, cu 0_ N cli ■— a) (!) O 4 a)O c -D n W >, of 0) .E •Fii ‘—'4- c Wicu U (1) (1) U O a) O CO (V 0 ..CQ-- cy) a) > a U) () u) rm L.. N W .N CO 0 a) 'i= = E a3 a) 4— Lr) (r) `- `' 0 O N O) 1 veacmo)it EEall O N aaoL0_)l O 2 L. cU a .' 0 car` 6co O L . . O U L- 'a^ u) ~ 73 O c , - O - Q rn .. 2 c6 M •— -oo 2cu -0o N N N,, .2 Cl) N co N � = 0 7 N 0 = c ar 4_, cfl c 0 > 0 U C , L� v) 0- E < o H = ULL o 2 al) a) om rl . . • eL0 cY . . 1-0 C N- c\i C?) 4 '' ,-, 'u'7 seN vbPl "•+e u .g° m 1V ��.yam• �uiaa.;� g$ or'VI l.a...r.p cS Yg.e o t -Li 41eou:Aam C c _ ' s' Que e Import It:80 r o 'C ril s�aV1W1. n g}= v p' m .7 lsnyya:a1 _. 3 d M P, - R L a.fit e+a,lo ppoa egou:s we', Li. �'>��44 a, s 0 6� d L _ dui�xll IJ � °� , , 2, E v a W _ y3 O8 c 0.8 Lip ea al El a [-€_,..L..0" U m � LLaSlieDa a7S A c`a c pia -.,,_ 7ri „ 8 = t `i r J 0 - '4 {}� IOC Ul 8 R ci U U [" 1.1 epEti t.;� '.l u,atuQ't 3s6eiy a l : rr i � _I E I J fjJ4. t._41g4. , IWi ��� n r.! .O I lt�� !meA In uocra M "..:L 4n _ iR ❑ Y ht t F 2 l7. 11"pJ G11R , a .i I 11111! I,I 4 .. fi��sO t7 ri i 1 iii a) ._Nom __ lEi g o IH ' U O t , 0 �, � = N _MI 12 _ O c meni Z �' - co cv O D L • W Cr) — Q a) o a5 ca o m a. c 0 E — vi Q N 7:3 N ._ L— rnO c W ca a. ,,,,,,„>% E '-.7. al N .al- (-I a) 0 0 u) CD cr)< ........ ....., ocoo iiiim W � cn �' C c � N L +r t6 c N c a) o (n O cA c N O 0 CD O) Q +, O O a) (Lf Q o W 'N O � � x' O Q 0 o O W W o a) .c. _, a. Q _ w2Q o zco CO 0 2 -0 • . • • • • N. , 0, 1 ' 1 .s.i. '-It .., r 4 I .. -7-,........1 , --,/1.-- - • I . 1 1 It 0 1, I iiii , i I illl iv . ..t 0 it' I J ' ... t. • . ''-'4* iiii . 1 L ' lif + f r 1 f - ( , A i i I , i ' - ( 4 4,411 i/ : h '*I.:, '..1 , .,,,,,. .7'. i, e ' ' - 0, 1' 4 I Pt. ',fr rli • 1•,. /nal . 1 Vit, 0' ., I i/ r n FI` , o A i,i Hlair V Q �4 n /r ..an ._ _ n« r r t It ... ' Z i II Ili/II III lif I A ` ^}h a) .__. . .., 1.1„iiiiik 0 . 0 f I ' lilt lid 2 i, a) C CD (in --. C .� = cCD 0 CU (6 O E N ca _O O O CD 0 > L C 0 >, = ) - o 0 C - � C > a) = O O 0 °' CD o � o CUB U u _O a) ON -0 co (� c6 — •— a) CI) c (a cn Cll .5 O ao � � . O �� v oQ u) y— N j % Ca . co Cl" % = a) c a 05 W i5 2 (n ca 'in (� Q • • • • • • • 17 ai & 'Ji0 opuoY- [ - 0 m 15. N 'u7 uosdwes JK)suoi a'uI Xgeweo d Cl) U) —_ L r MI , ..___I w ---MI-' 45 ,j - J e,o 3 paey;oo .uiiegiu. r- Gp•-%\ No` •ui auog2l l uopu 3 .ul ti U U�C. z v Q o JC u,UOpCJEe y EL > In Y c4 0 - Lu J JJQ.Q.eS '71 13 ■ 'JIQ 6O 9)I 'ul Ilelsunl L. °O ' L � CD V c co o 0 V .0 C C . -I—. L 73 0)■_ }W > a = a) O 1- 0 ' = 0 H fX Ci) (/) C w 0 (/) _ .- 1 o_ a) = 0 'o 0 _ a ' Q0 > 4D N N E' o O N 10 N 2 � N C' o ° � � �' a � � O • wflQ .� = o c o o cu 044 • • = Q Q • • • Z `I 1 t,:'•'F,..,21 , a) N _ pue14-7 i .,- O O ) I N Q N c -a 0 co �i Q `.. _ _ , , f, 2 N .. e ` Ct 4semumR b!1 ,r CU L C co C CO cu) O co (N O O o. O W _ .-N U cn _c .CC: (1) - - •L O -c ri2 ON '0 U 4) Cl) la _ 0 (na. o 7o o a) _U C > —aCD = = a) cn -0 oN = Q) O cd' N o CO C N -ON W ►+- L � N _o O) � V a) N O •n o o n CO a •� C� 2 Q eL 1O Wa < = o_ o_ . . . Q0 - , I i • __________ ---- __ _ ,--•7-, , --.,a' ,.• I' 1 c, 4„. • '''' . ' 4 , .. i,..„ --,L, 4,.. _,,014. q ,: ..% ... .... , , ._ .4 . ..._ ,..1 --.... - , 4 $t 1*-7- -- •i ii .ji i \ -fr'.: 2. "'Ea:.i.*:lib .:1E:- .•--- ' yit .. • -:. -.... .^-.1,1111PAI, '•-•"_ 3 i._, , - _ . , . , *741) ..„ 1 . ,. .m1, A 14 .... _ i ^j 1 mr. ,-.. .:+ - '',WI. 11—') 1- -- - - . '-. 1- -. •-i. . ------: -- 2 .., , ,..‘,., -='--; " - : : .,-. 7 —- , 1 , t f •.f \, , ii. ' ‘ :', • :::, r. . , 1 0,7 .. - 4.,,.- it I 74 — ii ' 4 :4' , 'Vs P., , "... „ " V • ft : , ,„,,,,, ..,.;:, % 1 t (ill:4 • 1 / 4 if,y ..- 1. •,,,— .:1/44..-- , „1,''‘'‘ '','':' ' '1 t 1 4'A , ;?•'--f,:'-',":',..'"4-4.' f-'1,0,11.'11 ''' , ',i -'•,,,,Ye,:,,,,,,r>,,...'4F-:;".ni;.;', . ''4'4, ,' .1 1 1 r 0 , 1 ,i • ' .k.v. ill i .,..,,,•,,,,7, • . -.. t. , i.• -. 1''' sA- .:: ' 1 ,, ,r : '• ro 1 i a‘r''' VS i i , — S. a) � ooO JcL •u o rr (? L r r r o 0 rti.40 IsamuapIGo %I NIIII CD _ N — N 0 = 0 L ct .0 E2 CU < = L a NN =a, o o o cm > `... 70 O 7 O O c O = ca ..., c N U) o = 0_ � O Cr) ni _ C C 0 C a .c a) '- c a) ii N L .- Cl) v > to (13 cj (I cn 7 ■ a) --C-1 22 O Q) O O rn c = a) c Q CL a) 0- a) cm co N O O N ca I a) � C �, 0Q + N � W O. 6 .= aa) = o a o a) U 0 c c 7 `� N O U E O O O _ co 4� ON W — c cn - - a) gi N cu U— 0) ow >, p) Q O N N N ' 3." Q mom C (6 c O -t c) 73 — a) L0 }, O L '( O C.) C O -t O 0 a) = 0> CLQDO- Q � w0_ 0 ID < (/) 4sennueploo "a W a) CO Silverbit Ln. 6- CO 0 N 0 • N °cross ■ Ln. 7 "Z 1 m Q =_m- ' York 'U.c`. H N -==== .u.i ,>peq°ipp C CCS CL >, 0 C) 4-ENtim. > c o a) .— p O cu o i V CD N i = u) CT a) c N c ca a) o C o cLa L 1- c — M co -a -0 cn _ • co M -_I c= C O O O CD C J W :=, (I) cn a) .-' 0 .N E C I C 0 a) o cn � � N .� I N- 7C2 3 c.) o ca C) C) U) � = ti � � � O o '� � 45� � aF 0 � a) ) ra) oU c5o � a "0 C .c a) 7_ c15 - - 0 0 0 (I Q o — o_ al O 0 • ON m -6 tea) aU) a) 2 c0- V N � c -- 0 -a .1) c) i o o a) u) M II W Ce W µ1:i,ir: ,{! 4� ( 841 /1� ., ...f, �. ` �.... _T _.. t f• ''', ,( :. ),Ir , lit' i. \ 4 .'. ', ,. , \11yYyit& `1. sv t ti i}.s, `pi.". "�3"`' ' ':.' 1. 4 E.i' 5 . 7 • C �s; t x j . ..1— \ 4 L Y _ .; j 1 �V t \ blNb 4- lI d h O •UI4 ! ',_. li = , II IIIIIIN 0_ , V + N NO < u) = 4.1_ o ,c 1 _ E •— O a. c 4) (13 > ime O w w_ O 0_ = = -0 a) = O C) c_� ENO S. 1- c-7) 0• Q L N a) c CI 0 c o .i 0 E cz -..., ,Li) >, 4"0 s ��_._. =-E ,, vim. ^ CDlc�Z C .cn_ 2 a) -I-, O > _ Q) - c v O >, E - E a) L Lc 5 CO 0 'cn O a W w a) o E �' co co c2 CM c . _ o � L _ = 0 sD 0- cz E .. p > co OD w = CD O O >, o Q � o I- Z < c3 _ . . . N 1` U N. a0 ti NI EON N a) co O +.� �. ti M 0,1 >1 a) a � a E ) 0 OM V = 000 "' co }� O = _ N N CU L. a) N o o E CO _1 0 - o CD 0 ZJ h I � � Ce C C CD a5 a O r� �. rD z= Q .t 0 O O d r > 0 2 Ce < O. < 1 0 Ce < 0 - ce a) -o tJ) > o_ 0) a o .0 O 1 >- C J D. Co A L a a) U) CD ai CD _aa) o2 Z E -8 :=.(7) a) O .c a) aE 7 ° Z ov) > o CO) 0 013 L_ (7) (13 CD (I) c a) >� E � � cam 0 a) co ° a) o ET) L C EEa) } .o� > a) O o0 >' -o0 � � � m .� - � ^cn E c _a}+ • N- o) o 45a) c 0 <E(tMn1) .-L' %.Li. 0.7 .. ._ 0-0 50 p O O cUN - • C'7 F2 c q-, — 004z, O.l.N O >, O g 0_ 0 L- -I o cn •— O N u) O5 rQ L O ,_ Nco O 000 ,._ co E N ) o EL EO V) c � oQ a =.— n c p �+= v,�-- -I-, s CO I ccn � -a O a)Q13 . en -8 ca O E O nO -o-hid >, c 6 ,41 a3 F >.t= u) co E p �o N J p O. CO >,-0 'O p N co 2 O L � +, pOMN �Op � � �� � 2b— c EcV - U) ZOO o <Q Q < C2.- ZCOO I . 10 0 2 aJ > O Q oZ CD 0 O Ncoo o Q N c ° O Ci as L) C tin - INC c a) ��tf . z N c, O J a o 0 * 0 0 0 0 o * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m_ O Gl 00 h l0 V1 d- M N 1--1 C ,CD 75 73 E a) 2,3 cu L cu � -0 o Q 2 - CO o -0 o g° = a) C:)CO a) 0 .O Cr) > ga. o U +- a) u) C E Coo :. .-- 0 C ,03 J O C o. CO C " a) tiOff. UC �IC0_ o Ear � Z Q c3 o 0 � 0 INC Z z x o 0 W M I� .� N Ct w °' c c �� 1 $h At �� .0 1 z;� f;` .-• F" , yI; I0 >. - `��iii#// 0_ c....) c c (i — E O J CI O •3 VI u -0 n c co au c p ° •- ••° c E +, C Q ,ro Q a w (6 L O > c c a. " V (B O c E < •...,,— C N OZ t..10 Ln o ° o Lim �' C13 • c o CD 0 E• U ULLI a- ° + -0 ro o i C C13 "cO = o ao E (o ru "c U _ 4--" .-r C O Q O OCO O C v TO CI) CZ co m U O bit = f- N L }, W 7.m o c u c6 0 O W . u o `— c Ce 0 C (6 O O co v +_ 0 N o +3 c - /�� W L V1 N cC CUD. 0_ N `v O C E CDC " 0 c cAO . a) } > CO f�6 O E . >. Q p v .0 Q Nin C c o • a) O (B o 2 Z E a a o O)E ..._, a) i"' � _ao C� Leo }, — _ -p O a) vJ �_ in ro O 0 O (a a) O N • w Cep +- co v u U O y- vi 4 O o Qimil X U co U) N ® ,� fl a� o 0 0 Q 'C ci 1 C..7 0 > +r c Cl) W a, U o 2 .� _C L L J o Ul mc.9: QJ Coo vj 0 CD'III v, ° N .7, ..0 --, O ' 0 • i-mil U -0 Cl..) +� r�-I ii PtH V/4 1/ �F, by 1, .,• '� ff: • ed..‘ a) o �,i's• ;Q Q.s v W a zia , - ►— % "9.� ,'Ti L �. :,• , 1vo11 u,j }' .v U C L J a L ( O = U -, t Q N a c — C., a C O CO Z CO c E Q �V) U v +, Z C � 2 a)ini �. L.L. = a _> Q L o CL ♦,4 C o '. co an E E +, CD ■� 0 o b.O = W c .c a N co0 _ c c W a) CD_ ft g CC IS F.1.7, •U— -C.,_, tta E— v = t]A U C 2 = E a O o sm CZQ Cl) E a) ICC IT, V U = M Qi L a O E co C>. 4_, aj — C -0 a L N a co U O M0Ca 0 C � �, C� �'0 � ci_ co � o CD W a •_ o � '� - O ' a) �7 a) mr) CO Con v cB _C Cr) > CU v a }' N 77,s U Om � L ropil 8 2 .-) v 1• ��PCH. ...�Nb O , %.7 /"jam •� ' � ' �• f- 1 r1 y ' k' • cB y0 �•........•.6-.Na 11 O 'C O .,_; C.)C c�v v) - (1) = Q j a) O a c = co 0 a) �, 0) o = u Q — a) O _c u Q E `� O O (15 C ,� o N• .E 4z O p Q 0 ra E E O) o ° N a) +�. O c do •- U 13 D 4- W C Q N O tU0 a) O O N Q. m •I — C Q. Q) U U a ...z Q V Q c QJ a) 4_C corO n O C NCU vI CD N .�, U CO a) N co E •_ Cct, Q aQ+ IX N C o .L (t .Qassmil >• fo L (2.) s -' Q Q in in c . _ a) v, ocr) L ILLJ L • cu 0 .., -0 ..) (:,..) 0.. c V) E ,.--, ,,,, . _. .-,„ = CO, W co._ }, G a� TO , •_ ,„ v, L E `-'. a v co ......... , O 0 . ..-E o O '>, o 'o U O Wci. o ° U 0 E a) - V N L cu ,�; N LLB /�� C U o U ■� cu CD L1 O Q � C . ° 2 2 IMO C L E 0 C/) Q > 73 c1 CO N U 4J N z • N v .,7 0.. og 0v, •L C 0 v co �# `44 Qb O �� O Q v > o� " 8 < �'n w 43 Q� 1 o `c i g " N i i 0F i o. c , ''' ... �` �ZI ti N bra -n�w �,. ..: 0 ....:71 liii O Z�/ W O � 0 , Z O s 0 < Cr m F ry 0 O U • O 0 Z i. . Z O R. T ej i06i. '474 a O U. 7 ._. W oz G : a0N v o rl 9 ... m gca yyW v L N WEn uNE a E _ Ck pp •V` i. r 0 y I .� a if vde Z 07 so 0 o - U O � o E '' o L n F N t 0 f 4 5 ♦ .. ars ,,.:., o E 0 Z • . CO Q -,$ ,r., - a., w 0 1? x ' , w 4 A. $ ,y `r,..„ • 01. ! ` s • ,r CO) 13 Ta Air i s � J O 0 P Z O WC., 3 c ; HO Ob1 row. e ,i A ,,- mg. , . ' / /, , y f' U. O y c sh y R p6 o , U G t , ._ I = " J E a ,C J p "' . w 7 3..' f a: Z a ,a fo x O o W _� y az ., 1— 0 u m n y E g # c .2 E E a = v 8 .r ,,.. E U 5 E .o E u u o ' U N C x r ^ j a t fVp G L • § m g ai 4 J N m U N 9. 0 ~ 3 T, Q. 0L0 gr �pH bl N� Obyi�; ‘io a- v� cn 1 •72 1 ' ' tz1 �. _ �co .,.,s,;- r� ''m;o 1 (I) a--+ .Y••�'•.•. '' •••��� A �. ••......... N �!4.1 I c39 #Il /J /M� -0 0 V/ 1L C v) •', a) U IS . s O Q N 7' ,., a 4_,4-1D C i i -16 ``' I. N O W Ova , ', � Q ` O - U C m 0- CU U •r tat) `~O CO W "Ix ,. .401i _ a 'In ia� r II O N =w >. v. 4- •E zcD i_ cn V cn �-. � •� 0 = -\ QJ co 0 Ce -C3 U d.) - 4A Qf < 37. CJ o •-' 3 -� , , ;,,,,,,,,‘„,, 1- 0 *". I •r i, .V) O +•+ .— O `� / �aag E 0 r,>- 7D h-- v) 1 J.,-c- /- ,, — •— t. d CC.y ,, O N ' E1..._ > rem , C k '---,- / t I 1 op '::: 4=1 a--+ \--\\ N _ '> V }t �, , p U �a l'U a ts) 0 � -0 N -. tan V L • a. •.. , ,. ., f 4-i ; I •• ma ` s ¢, 1/ll C H'y� ; .4 alQ:. ...•............. , �: .y/� if ,_so •- � �; •.. J 0. 6 sr -a }-i s = 1 = CLO Z'o CU CD a--+ C % ) 1I 47) co a_' - P 00 C a) U _11� O��1i G a� o O -0 O +- N — CIA -0 L_ b Ca E CU C � - c� .-NON C C -I-' .O C O < c o o r- _ 4A U E (� co — N V U N — U p •X co O szu D W — G c% N N ■ ate--+ > 'n _C Q N N 0 aJ 0 a) co ,C-- D _C p CUD OC O = CID E 4- CC C N O O �C N a) 2 L- m m i� p -a C a) w .- c ru 4-1 I . •NCU 0 N E . cu p �O 0s -+--' W V) Cc La Ecr) e--- O E 1-5W N N fi C�0 c c V c L 0 _,__, ‘..) = 0 ._ u L- a) v) a c6 co � — OID - ,- > v Q p 4—) N 0 c6 p NI NM Cp 4' m 71 }, N U (II� C O _c � IL co U p.� < U • • . C t C U < RI CU Z U 4-1 ki- = 0 4E73o v CC 2 ' f— m = cn a) . OU E +.0 C co .0 Qco , a) Ecu . w U a) , 0 . o E ,_ a,p < U () O U -, 0 cn I— m = Z7) Q O to 0 C cu o - co ■� U L mlmi V U N ,a) tow < U 0 cv - e J I— CO 1 (73 l0 J 4-1 L �'' op ooa) w $ . E o o - > o cn O >. -0 O- V) +-+ +, 0 O ' C co c �� co co • N c Co Uca O� }' .v +-' ' v 0co Crn � 75 > - � � � � � �N CD —I N OU O p 0 `n U 0 O N � � U� > (� x �� Q � v� ca p 0 C Oca — v, � U a. Uc6 Lim � • • Q. L iCD ,, .*. ••• �". U �oil ..040. � cei ' , CLI S bS ' .O V>J � • 4 i` » c s .�' J" - �� ". ....::,...'0 # W rr > Q . eit,,, •a' .„ .. '?s. _ fy) ■� ,._ , , , �. A ;_ OU H ch _ _ N � :It( aJ_.. 7N � C cn .• ._ V O N 0 $ , co co ^ C • N 11) cu N _ a) 7:,311 N 'a V C r i CO Q) Q _ N N E .12 1 Ui, O 0 0 Q J = _ w M . pTr C N. O N Ur) o v J E 4 IVv� a) c O- 'O • a)• L CDcm W c U c Z3 cmN CD eL +O+ Ore% fU ++ ,� NI aJ F� 0 i ,� 0 >+ 2 . CO a O g _ 0 c zz a p Z a, O = 4- c 0 'ILO S Z "U >• I Q. i. 0 O O CO > 0 2 = Q Ll. Q = U Q: Q Cc I— H '0 - ( CU I- R -0 0_ C ._. -- —_ U 0 v y `CD X c co U §' L ' w4.1‘ U a T � O r•:.r 4 W v !a L "• cn V L '� .. o Q 3 co IS .� '�R - . En r OAS O J �, in r.,, .;: - a c0 0 Z ' C 0 U ',r 3 �r tab.:;' L *' O V ID v",�_v im Q a N , — W " . ,..",!.2,:,,,k.iiim;',:151111r114t ' '''14:: ,....-'',044;:.:4CP":74,:f. i M Z w , O ,�_, V L — t •+ n c Cl 0 v) .� cn d cn 1 o ,�o ., c,_ a) ru CU 4--' U �- cD -0 4- a-1 a) p N = a) a) O LI— > LID (-NJ a) -0 -Ow a = — OO +-+ - c C O E O *co— cc .c O 0 O O uO 0 N O >' 0 Q N U V) v +, O N +� N la) a) p a a) 2 -0 c L. (13 N 6- a) = .O =O O 4- D 0 4A .E � O N O O O X N •N +-+ c L 4- L O N ca Q1 4— CO >. U O X. E NNJ i (� al ,. 0 Q c6 U 0 Q COao D O co — U +-' >, a) O" N \ 0- 0 N _0 cn > co co a) a) .� o O C a) CO L - U > ( X " � a) }' UO • a) 3 ca O +_' > al .� a) (/) - N 0 U 2 0- 5 I— O cn I . of --- 1 . irigis4 ,, 111 i 1 Cl) 111 ram L 111110 ® o rA 0 C a--+ ®ts' f 6-k ~ g, M "0 O O ( Q . . i9 `" LL a)- > a O , '1 M•• 0_ 2 JON 0 Q e ` '. Ni YA310 ..��..s� •.w�iwts��gii ntHPIMPIIIIIIIII IAA XV'. 411 as 4-11 ifs Ili - C9 01 O t\ . Mc-(5) NG I— ft A o � _ U c_ E N O „ = O c oO cu V 4. N cp U O Iii i E 4 CVLO Q = — 0 o 'E U — co O c > U-fD (Ts N 4 - C O O E °' E > O O CI)U CC O CO LO UCD Lu v to 3 A m c �, .C -a N O U v > , >. O v C co U C ' 0 a) Q Q +, u U m _ r• C E 2 O a) O OU H > +N+ 2 i >+ LL C 0 Q Q v - 4) '0 Cti Q N u Z N O CDCD = asOL 0 O O w O = Q laoCe < Q < 10 < I— C C -_ 1 ` • 1 U [1E3+ �^`}� - � j: < -0 C (13 C ' �LYE F O DEtiio U E m, Iliiiii ���i z w • ® =� r"' — �� O 7 en 0 MINE -v O e z �a co 2 ; w c' _o `� 4 '. CD N ca 'U SW y ru 12 v, 41 U aJ •N N 4J o line ' V) i A C = Ali , ' a) w O a) N GPO _ = J , u. co -a U ammo E -0 _ N cn i = N _ ��e !' a Q N Cl) N +, I� 01 n U0 o > .E Ea) tL) O4 I 0 CON' aq N O cn M d oc U N a) }+ L!) (in rNi °X (13 � t- = 0.0 O .- vl U O ,v) i c — 0 cox O v +, p CD Q •X N� N O IIIIN J U .-" U +-1 c Q a c -C IML l0 N a.) (a v) p t � N �m 0 0O �71 Ln co m CD -0 -' (BO Li— +. co a) N i a) O_C L. CAA n v N i aJ N Q.-0 I� a••+ co E bp a;o 03 E N aio E c 0 Om 0 0X co 42 OOID `~ Ua) Nw z N CU= C% vC 0 0 •o N CY)> U DC V DU . >. N E E CO cn U V) cn CC U ■ 0 _a7.-0.:i...,.,,,. , -,,,-.....,' ,..,, .1 , In 1 1 ,.;.x,.,: ihb44 w w G.) ,_ 4( i.u.„,..ii ......,.-,.;:, , ! pi„.;:r.Jc.,, 111., ,,,, ,,,.. :. . ,....„ ,..,„ ..,, -,..-•.., 0 . a, -' x "' is 2 . '�:li ,. 's MVO t--4`� ,,4 A. a O II ^.- , .. 17,2 pas ® �►�'' M p t' �Yid �'� 0 ' Atc ::.,,E-Ekm..: ••,.,.,,7--:01:al 1111111 11111 no I& , CD- p7;-) `r�F Z.� Q b.i t •Emu licic a. 2 0 .2 cn Q 3- 4 co (O co c i� O O r" L N •c a) a▪ ' t -0 -0 U 4 a) d O CZ -0 > i E 49 — 0 - c O N 0 _0• -0 co o � am a,) U v Q O c _ 66 > 'C " ,1111 - cn t (a a) +-0 O N III o 6) (0 N -0 ! LCO ,.1j jej • c D [ NPig ' 3 E a) to p > O .Q >% O O c , co � L J c �� Q ••- F � CO z C > o -1:5�` 2 (D Tu A L C. CC U o 6 �' = c N v, O N Q c% �O L cc CD c a O v) i3 N U c c . _ c U •— O = 2 c° -0 cD I a = 0 aD 0 -0 a) a. • a a� a� a, Co , _ > .CI) 2 - .- C >, 2 `t (0 (a O 4 V _ m c 'C C Q (v = c i LL Z 0 �+ O > O L '43, 511Z c4 Z (9 U (B -CJ L Q' co Q a c ° U O) awl > �,; • cs- •I. O . c u3 cL pia 1 ,I .41,,,e,.„_,Ih ,114. ,,,----- , -kfi ' u c -,-7,- ,gulp, L.,...2i .,,,,- a .,.. ,,,::;,_ _,:„3.-„ < .E c cu 0 C to ' ' ►-, D (o -0 = b m r eK ��rt O QJ L a--+ C ,, Ili MI 4- i V w "O OL ft‘c.1 "...g 111—I N la:IC u-° c°4= 0 Ili x R ; 1�1g an r. - , of aJ s V c 0 7) (2 •E = E--- MM. P. ► a, Q N c +-+v c -64 } _., N O CI m 0 E ao -c CL au L 0 can canm CD a U° f° v) co m = v CID N O co G C U _ 0 m L 47 V cB a) p C CI) i c aJ vi N >, N 0 i ULL 4_, Co� X co C v a_ •�-0 U + C U as L- C) cn • U o Cr) co Ln N v, aL- o Q p CN -a m -a v cn U +� E }' 0 C +, v O oLn N ��7:5 V) 1_ CIO v � N N c� va c/) }' co aJ N a v� v-- > _o v; C� o� >- cn co- -0 ^ •- O Nco pca bb vaaJ� ) N C N E a = v v °- v�'- a1 � p N as +- co Don —0 •� CD III OM' -0 Q�co.4-j -0� . -0 1- a.) > —c co ICI ♦� Cl.) xo CU = -0 v +- vo ) Cw V cc w co cC 0 Q 0'cn O r r 2 CC co U • • • • • • • • a) IDwireit.....„___ --,,-,---...—....7.t .7,..7,7-,. .,,,,,,,,,r,,,, ,,,,,i,, midi I--. iii, R 1 IaL R —a ,.t `I 3 _ iri Cor) y�ifiIIIiji �C � m E � � "' r _ IItt � ! 1 I r 1m fro' E � �, � 4 . • -� .�. IWuuhIi f�i '1,,,,, , ..r. lii ..:, mauve ' m a - .1, ;lit � zoo - '', '46,441r As .. .,,,,7,,, ,,,...,.,„,_,;,. „J.:J.:J _ . kiii umeirni, *V aim i Alma ' litto\\.,1.-.-_.- _ ..".-vf:11W WV I/ El ggithalleS,../ 0 ,a--.....; ., ----- --m tejlir 4 ......_ ;,, :..%'7-it"7.7.2Na.4.'i,.....-. ..:. ' ifil XX amormi i �.+. 0 filia•s� rcrvI1;:�.=....— - . rws®a�va-cln� '1 %/Li LII N 2 v CO C CC =o, L U = I = CO •7 IV t13 - co -CD CC L a + U O N 4— C OA M aa-- 'X vs O C 4J i C aJ vi N \-a u a-+ C U CI) 4J N Z C co 2 C O> SD 0O -0 (D ocu "' 0O +� -0 L- ro pain U o u. Lncu Ncn aJ can 1- 0 Q 47. O C N -o rn -o cv �, 0 ca vl _c c N O 0 L.n v a cn aA v v�, N. CD h L c13 N in cn c D c E o.N Cl- v� Cl)X > � � Cl) C - 04J >� cn CO—co -0C U O v, CD E co b "' tco a v =0 0 vE a m CDC 0_N a-0= U U co - f6 Opp _0 i -0 Q"O -0\ U -0 C Lis v) N >-E X 0�Q Cl) X"O ND 73 N +-' CI) co � uj CY W � cC-0 a o"( ON CC CO U • . • • • • . . 7177'. L"."°114r11-- ' ' 'C'''''''' J I L c 11 {U ', 3 X ,9,, ISO : . . , c� cfl �a 4 in tit :`� c7 O = , -0:-.. pp N M � N Q c Z c- o = O 4-',cc Ut c O CO c2 V 0 co O N O N Q 0 c O ~ ++ C i O C O v o ti -a 0 o '_ co , ao 0 0u N �O N N (13 O s- VI ao a cn c ,_ L_ 3 E 4 I in a ca U J OU 0 CO N U > N (0 N -0 N E ti - O d N d O O V) co a) to tD Ii JE t >, V C N d N c > CO M o N O rn c c a •7 O N c •,r N O 0 X +_+ O F� 'a O O 0) "Q �A Ca) O cn ♦da C i .— co A G U u c ate., < V - 0 _ 12 CO _ Q CO U - N Z Q n .4. c 0 O Q) ca Z to Q as 0 = c _0 U Q 4-, 0 -0v o D MO m to St • 0 +, v a" M u V O }' 0O 4-1CO Q > O Q ,\ i .Curtin. N 0 v) -0 Vi 1. "'�ieoi .� 4 0 01 ), cc 0 00/1111 $�r� I ej. (B E (0 0 0 C N 1 n ' s- co ,0 } i }tllue E # V ++ -I-' NI Falb: , m1 e� , g N � ' , V 10 0IIIIIP• - f is 21 of .. r�: G1 v1.r %I lti' I a a c6 = ` N L N U >. 0_ N t () N E co 0 0 Om •X +-+ cn ca aJ (0 CO 0 :" ",ro E CD0 vE � N a.) _ N Ca U c�i1 a--+ -0 C i Ca CT) a) O CO u1 CD . C a. co co 'Q m ca v CD • -- 04— a> >. a) = +aN - 0 v� N 0 + N�N - mvC `oC0uo cn cc u E . cn j ro 0 -0 co o �aJ,� '� w L o_ � .� • > C CD o �U .N N X .C cC v 0 ON cc OZ$ I- O • . • • • 11 {I �` _ ,.�ar �;' �� 1 ,-i raillw it m fiiiiiiil rrk ,� M , _ v _ t . ,r« __ , frig ,pitFd , Mik6 .2 , 70 f � . ra fir a rt.. f as w ir9 iiiii- lin co cc'\:1 a) O_ a) tl° E > , E 4 V NL f) o E 4'7 c„ u aJ Q 0 = D rn! :z ! ; Ii c) pMp O ~ N" co a _ O a--+ E o 16 aJ L 4--, L O .N N = d N A. 0 C I— o ��+ o i e. .Q - a1 0 -0 Z 0 . N > !0 — s.' �— Z C C = O. i 0 O CH CD > O = •L ED c Q Q 0. Q 2 0 0 0 — > O 0 c C.) c 0 = ca N Q) . o C:1 4-, N CT aJ C a v.,� , Q .mod N E CO Z.Z.e-1 +-, u 0 a. s,4 i a . f f '.xa O Q ro d ►AiY .- l[ 3 ! 0�t di E cu Q, c = v1i 4 (6 I->-�I 7 ��l i�11iii 4 a'' s„ aW — - 6 - �,Rr''� 11 L 4. L _ — 4.-1 s. , a *. et a.• N >. ++ .5 fD S✓ V '. b led QJ N N O _ -� -. ,• ® ,_ : co _ fC cif of QJ E a--+ E — 'E o> CA 0 I 0 u- to,) Q E NJw C a1 U W Q. R •rn• v) o LE 0 N v v o `' 1.- c 5 - I A J -1.-- 1 4, i _ Eas , _ ..,,,, ir, -: ,---,-, ,;;-7,-,-) - In ,71-..1. r n J , ... .. ., _ Y *,� - . ... cii) , . : -, __.. 9 L 711M DI. tA _ 11.1 • oU ELouCOU CD • UO tAcOi U a) E o E •- ° CU > a) CI) � � Va, •> +� p ° ° V o' co c E Ew N -0 C a) < z O U NMI = a) CD O Li— ' - a co n � N■ >� " h o o• � W U O C >'U : 0- a- — /A N ° Qom, - i L Ca C w C ' O dJ O L Q W U N La — Cl.) co ° aJ +� +., 0 cn c6 0 f r }' 0— C b.O U U L � O +-+ — o a- aJ MN coCa) •— C Q D— ° i 0 a �� Em '- c c • - > w Cr < L_ U = 5 UCZU 0_-0 •v, CC — . . u_ . . . VI ■E L = .N N a) (� O t= , O O lD N 00 Ql v) C 0 I O r 0 0 0 0 0 O N N N N N N a--+ U N N N N CO CD O O O O O O C ■� Z Z Z Z Z Z .Q • 0ma CD eL2000QCO Q • W N N N N N CO ++ > A 0 Om O co > a) 0 2 N — (/) -o N CO •— a o cn -0 'CD c Z a) 0 Q > a) o cc N V (NJ OO a) o oi i N N D N I 0 C N °1 x o z ■— O cc UJ N z Q RS o • '� Q CI o 0- w ii li CIS b� Il o• .•.•• 1 oy/ a- \ •CU Q m• \ •O i k m i ��C444hhh... +- m m ,..„0.-. ref; `rvol N N N. '••., ' '' •'% lD N N N 4.//3 Q%Q'\v/' O m v 0 (N cn< O 0 if)- , L n Cu C co L m tt —, _0 Ni ff± I aU O L LL N N t _ i F c0 U Nic NIL CU O c O O 0 NI —, N I_L t/} 0 ,,•, ) _. en-. 0.1 ,_ N ri a) ry N > N N O Z NIa1 L` }, NI NI • 0 2 o Z 13 O = w 2 E _o O � L O Q. }, N N Q Nr., _ _ N Q C U O O r-I N O ( ) I U r-I r-I I-I Z C •U_ U 0 a + Q CO I •O v sm. � c .NOD = � C c � Om Or„' c E co >, cv CS L m O Q) ..' aJ L- -0 d.) - a U 2 U 2 0 < 0- U a) a) LC/ a) 0 L no +' +' co fo _ N I . -0 -0 O M a-+ enO rn cB cB ++ dA N a Ni +' N N a) N a) O < 0N ,_ ) 0 N O N N ii)- } } II (B Q) L I M I M L rn U N C N Q N N v) a) iik p NN —, ON �i NN cu if)- >- >- al c co a) L L C —, LL CO CO .p corn I_ M d U N C N -0 N N N 'a 0 O O O O CU N O O N — N Li- N V} > } MQ hiUp QO Z N • > N N NI 1111 O 0 z .Q N CU (113 Q -0 N \ \ co cB O :_, NI zo 2 2 E • co ci., E Q O (NI NI N\ i N +�d U co+ N 0 OQ _ N 0 >- •_I -0 ZCO .L ,,,. N N Q) a' N N N >O QJ \ \ N UD U Q W 0 0 c-I N O 0 0 O2 Q 2 U Z Z Z ■_ c a1 O U a) rti• D_ co c U � co U ++ a ' U +' O U o = = a d U d U 0_ L _ -0 c a •— aO Q < CO CC w cn a) a)CC -0 cn c O V, OW u) = -1-0 . C3 2 c (1) 0) E .° McEw ..... cn . >1 C.) co 0 ..cn 0 0 = C2i cp U = U 0 oo_ o cki//' ,,,,,,,,,............ ,0 p0,...0... m. iik..._.I., ., iI1/ • , i., ,,x/e0 1 ••• - , , i ' i v • 1 , /i ( ► i ) . • (Z * = 11t • . \ • \ C.. 17 i&I I, Is,, t.. *---, 1111:11 i N ' ' J a; .• % . • C30- 1 ? 7- i I \2 . - : 1 t ° i t, ' '''. • s 1 f': '1 - 41 Z1°0 C?O' E--- I ' '..Q0. : I / .- I{) i, , • 1/4/ 0 41 t /c.4). / I \\ 11 l' i ' ' ° kJ" c) 0 %e I 1\ ' 'II' I .. �_-. , i1 1 o• f►� 0 w +.11 . C Cc .0 cm '0 -(7) ..71 ° N N fl c) N a >, N 0 E. a c NI -7 � '‘'- m 1-° 0 (7 4) 4A.c pE i C = CNI O4 �U � ca cn � - v •- U o C 0 NI U z Ua U 4D . . . U N of) w //,04.40►40.410%., /11 Hb'G /� P 0° •. ., * 46/0 h'v AO ... i '' .4.0 * 1k �. O .-�;)1 11 0 �• � co if II "-_•• c, l , �-_ 1 1 V , cg . ' .-a- l • ct i r.: ‘ G •• ( ; „ : 0 11 -.•,;„). : f 4,..• \ ' Vie` f 1 ' .:�� : , „ . . - • e 0 V F ; 1,1,4 It. , ,-..,.. - . .. . 4 /u",,, 4 1,.: .. I .1 ay f I �. �' i t I ''' �+ 4 :-It M# t. it i. Y t o f R ( �I' `t '� � 1114� 44444/111 = O 1 ) ;t il. ,;;t:. a) , . , .. , . . 4—+ co Et: M CD03 � C E o) to C /� o 7+•C W O +J += a) -0 �O O O N co C � „,„ _ c 0 c cm ,_oci a) .....,0 c — m . c O > Wo _ 0 -DO � 0ca, � — E cn c .0 E z °- 2C5QQ ° � 0 • . I • , /1!• No�P,ON V/Nd,.. i ■ W a--, 4J 1 _Z: ` ! �" 0.0 v n3 -0 N i 1-- := \,• :,z , v c > }cu, ' •.•• ORP /I • N v - CO Q n � a ON 0 M a cn oa a) Cl) -- C OCN W o 0) CO N N LLJ a) o 0) , c C O to C W CD i 0. to '_ N C O O cza) c a) O N = 0) !n N — co o Q O -C } = ' O = E O cB cn U) cn _ U E o c U o C •a) U CO al c O •3_ E ° � °- CZ W C Q •N —IU O 0E -.-,, E c\I 0 -4 „co o 2) •E it-3. E ' N- .4_, 0_ (f) r_ o 0 0 U O —CDO c0 0 O N 0) NO N (Z U) a CD 0) (D N O O (NJO N N 0 pO C C COp ,.0 N M (I) N o0 N N u) Cc 2 2 L $ LO N N V) C N N >_ • i i i O C C •_ C o) >O —) —, Z --) Q Z vi O. — 6 a, 0 1 �. :a O �\ ■_ hA N c0 -0 vi L 1 1—;o �i :: CO 4- ., = v — 4.//3 ORP /I ._ p w • n Om O v • a O) a) U = a) V a) U L coA� a) T.) L 5 _1 .—.Fa— .-i 1,_., 22 W >+ U C.) 0 -0 = 0 E 0 L tea) o_ D a• - L- OU _ CL L C L . a. a) '8 _a L T CD 0 0 o ' 0- -0 a) ,ccaa) > +10 U l_ U a) U N a) — LL (n L C L_ E ca co -D (a . (z I ca p C LLJ . Li a) CD 2 U '� �' N = w = 0 f6 O `,, �+ rn a) 4 = N - a) o _0 - > C5 O •L=—L •• 9 a) u) w a) 0 N C- U c 0 _ N C u C C CD a) _0 O > U +- C N O L O a) .___ III O ,a) ~ n oN > a)z - N a � Ili CV n NN a3 ) ...O Q. O _ -0 a) ',` N O NINa) O > N C U)■_0 O +N‘ ~ ONpc� � 0(NJ N N 1:1 Q U N 0_ CO D O a) a) a) N I Ow < ) U ) O) � -3 5 p,CH b/N— a.c-D \ k of7- y% . VI %•, .. I cfn 0 .Q = _ O O U Cl) .� C O w E O w 4) W E CD cC C) Oco O L ^ C CU I 0 0 �- E N O) -cu C) a • o ■� j, E ,FP 0 Q) + • 0 W _Yt 7131 (1) N O Ci) M LRS Q N u 2 CD oa a) >, .c CD b1., Q li•� o4f W ^` O /� 06 E' N C N W c N 0_ _c N ■� O E E O > CD N WE N to COM U) c D C C L W a •� O O13) CM (..) -co— 0 = U0 CZ _ I I I :� 1— v 1 v) `y2 �O 6 to n•, � / C7.Q 6 .v\` ` Z •4 0;7 J . y• \ �,. ••�, i is f.(/3 O��i/, v, v E E E as o c (6 U _v U O N C ;_' c .+' C al p 0 . % C +-+ N • a) C -0o .9 C U tw 0 �' .0 ■_ Lii 0- O7 I . .CD ri `- O) O }' N t '=7 -C 0 /� L = CD c W • O . CD O `- }' a V ° � � Q U QCT o o c Vco Ct = m a is c a' -0 be E 7)O — al LL o oB V) _,- ° cn 4 . a) a C L L O 0 -n Q C 3 U }' = C a - n C OC N C = C E 03 C SD L_ E E a) L_• ._ 4— 0 0 W CO • • C O N +7) ca C 0 U _O tIO Q � Q '� z n I O V- U � (1) a)— - +—J O C 4 > v a) , U N -0 - co p U 1"•C m L_ CD c 0 o a) U O •— Otan a) pCL O 0 > C.) _C -0 C13 U C co C Q) Ca •o I +-) N O ( r -o a) G.) 1_ tap 0_ 0 a) 0 E ,..= ,_ ._ o Q OD CL Qco 47, co aa) � a� D N i (.,_) N ' -o � X � W O0 p c6 c E D) -00 C O 0 co C co O co U O ■moo co D 0_ cu W W 73 .0 O — ��AC ' b�Nb 1 ' . '' y/� t o o.• • f-- % — •o �1 �'% isi ...c) ' vi.�' '• C� al o a o o 7-1 0 en '.0 O al N O� M chi N (11)mil LA o o o 3r•I l0 Cr) l0 a) O O O M 4 4- N Lf1 r-I M N u (1 >.1) ? Y v O > ..... o _c v a) a O N O 0 0 o O O p N 2 0 * O d N O N 00 O l0 M z cu 0 ��^^ L C O L _a0 U ° a ma O o 0 • c-I ti on N N a u — V1 o C O O IS 0 O Q o -6 CIS O N 0 v V1 L OCU Y aJ aJ z v MC Q to N Y I- 13 to 01) 13 i al ON O.C. ) N0 0 i • tN a (111) cn O co o E• IA. = � o = I Q. v = O O -0E o fC CU N v O O � E O O u a O O C LL aJ = ai v LL a O O O 3 z 2 F- VI Z ii PCN b/4/ 0 �F, . r:� 3zlk o , CIL 2%\\'ems ' k' ,i/C2p�l 0 4wditiol../A0/9144 L CII!, 4- o _ VI - 0 0- = 13 0 0 a) ..,_ O p cu ai) _c 4-' Ti3 ..1 . !=z) •.„ * c::' 'cr) U C a i i i i i a1 d- N w fC i F-- Q Q1 0 0 3 ZCOa 0 o 0 4-0: £ N C NIf I EV) v1 ' E V N Oc _ OL v, 0 00OO O C V1 Vf o _ h9 t O O C O a ■ _ al a) i a) a) a) i O O > c t 0_ 0_ O 6 . a) N = O m O O O O_ O_ v a a. = O = _ = LD to = no a) 3 L,, O 2 00 I� I-I (.0 N M a (7 M 00 n l0 -0c w to N 00 Lri. M N c Q; > "0 M m a a) a „ a) CO) 011 . . .-1 ,,iii U C CO a) ut O r-I N L. fC L Q1 ut a) Q -Q ma a) C7 vl in E ZS a) a) ], Cu n E V, O a) L O = L M aJ f0 ++ O L a L `^ .. c cu O rts N o v, 0 C v 0CI 0 �_ �_ 0 CI) £ V) - > v, s �) i) -6 Ii ! 0 3 0 o L a o Y c 2 cu o a a v p 3 v c v °3 v, L o o W s a) a) N i a v v w E I 0 V) a i Q. V) in 0C �. aL �i I 0 I / P N " 11i o_F, .......,, by ztA ,� 1J i•Q S . \` '' y., \4 i1 ��,•�O`/� ,,•< , 1 >111 `�. 4.//3-••OAP #1 — ��� r, M 0 ci c, a, +' v 2 o > Q ni al an 0 v O o > (N Q N as ai LE O U fi o O L CU o 0 0 § 2 v o o 1- eNI° � a CD_D � -{/} 6 N N immil as C.) .— OaiCO 69 73 O 0 • O o = 0 O 0 O 0 i D. -0 = 0 0 O O J t11 Q m fl-c) as L -a cn O co J a--+ N. - CO U C N c M Q D 2 E > c)..... , 70 - cO — a, — O CU C_ 0 N aJ E C as p eL co 0 Q 0 a-+ N U Q.L. o (n oo U N 'a CO rn a -- CO W O �I J N — c Q J ca o O ca O 0 M N a)a = N� N _ Q CWH (_ C O N s o N a) I2 � � O 0 Q N in o I.II m ,--1 c-I N N O up N co N N ei -1 0 0 l0 0 d• m N M N 0 V) c-I O V N %-1 c-I CO Ol O Ql 00 ..1 CO N Ql N c-I N O c-I O l0 %-I N l0 LO l0 N Lrl ct c-I ' 1 O CO CO N N t0 Ol N .4 Cl l0 O N Lf1 N CO N l0 i--1 N N co" II N m O Cr) Ql CO CO N l0 l0 U.) I.11 N L.r) d• Tr m m m m m M i--I c-I c-I in. tn. in. LT LTin. in. VT in. VT it} in. in. in- in. in. tn. tn. in- C:, in t in. O f6 To r (./3 a) 0 N N t Y C 7 O o -Ho U Q u u) 0 O — > C C C 6 o - • u `- 0A OJ (a a i 0) > cc O u O! o. O > - O_ c� C u I- u a+ in OJ -p O- c C 0A — C r� fi v C 3 — i Q - u .. O1 Jo C CO i c0 V1 cc pp > cc N Y Q J Ol Y Ol C C o Ol L i d O -0 E u to O Y c u to ,, 00 O1 CE ro C C Es — C Y co cc LL i I O CU C N C +-' C GO W O In +�., In "IC V C Y In N •Y W rp C cu N C .= C v. r4 O -a C F Y (i -p ro LL '� w r6 C cc O C — C r0 "6 O O L 3 21 - C Q., Ol r6 ro C V- C >. V1 < 'yJ '� r6 rty N E Ol c N r4 GO .� Y N CO 7 O Y U LT_ i1 V Q N u V Y T N O V C > '�., C •Y GO Cu) ro r0 d • OO L N 3 t r21 Y O i E u fo r6 u Q C C S C 4. a 3 as Y Q =rn , ro eA v i O 4- 3 -0 i O O - '" ro 4- O i O ro v v O • S - Z m W - CL E. , • a m u. 2 a u- ,° a) to co 00 .........,a N Io -0 C M cz a) C •- C 0 "a= c N N U cn O N — pu) 4- 4) L eEl .CU..D - U viU) cam ' Cc CUc U v0 •vca) - — U) RI cn2 >41 4-4= e—(1) (I) C N TO TO o = •L. 3 O 03 O6 O'C ` N UU co V o ON (B . - DE C U) _ O _ NO oNO O c c a CL a -0 . Naas NIll c) a_ E r2 Q co IL Novo E E a) N• M 1.1.1 ~ di gir �`oPCH' viNy 6 •¢ o i — �So _: % ' " ` c F o N N L Ca O c EA- RI O cv co +� 7— U) _a O 2 E = N 0 = 0 00 a) 5 69- O 0 0 O co U a) Q. N co E o L o o co c 15 N > o = a) a) M O c a) �) -0 a) 0) cL5 m1=Il co (i) Cr) 20 (-) ru a) 1— .....-• -2 O _ (6 cn 513c C Oo cai V Cl) �' N— ° a) (� Ca ti c co cu r . CM X CO L U U ° o a) ° LL 0 C o -c E_ cu _c > o (6 o - N .- N co oE O c U) N U _ >, � a) N o a) a) 03 O O c (6 c m e O = = ccr)co L mod. m L- a) rn co Ls 0 0 O > N x Oc • N ._ O c Q w 2 0 Q o _ 2 li AO �`cPCH' ?Nb O • 6 a) , , ‘(C .. ••; k. '`. )AO l %'Cii• 4.LI3 oS ; it ctS ins - w - -:;) ilLr, O (�i,... titi��.:, i/ nSl.161 i ... s 'a•_ a yp. a �d� 13 :' a) . j t z 1Y V U CO C) a, m m Ma ° 0 0 0 W C E m _ = o ° o N a) °cu C) CU L o o co- N C- ■ E ca = p ca ° a, N N mimo •U N Cl) 0- •> 2 �O N }, � �. •� Uj � oa) o � � a) o w co N C I a ° = c.) � � C o U Q CD Cl) 0 0 O CD• N a)CDQ 3-3 . NU NQ _c �O Q a) -cgo I- • CI ,7 • �1s • II . Ca , I . 4... �, S .9 {� ,,• :_, .,t. . 4 ■N t 'i Cl) -- - . C m 0) . .,,,.., .y..„.... ..1::1 r Q /% J �Ir;'.. •- „E,,,,.4 sue is f 1 �, ■� %�� ' x. `,,✓- Yid +r-s`"^'. YI C'Cla , "Lrailak... f. t• %\PN I \ ' H ■- �i'\ C 01 ' — )f..--- / \, k . �to _ `"' 1 pp { , 4 i£ i..•}.0 1 ' ' ' - 4-rs:-.-t... --. - - -.ixc..u..: %;...,;..I.4.-\-,f),',t,.7...,_... „._\.-,.„.,._ .,).i _. : .-.'_,_'_,_..-,',,7 1 14..,1.„-.,..;.,-,- ,,. . ., , , . . _-_•, ....... . ,4.,......-_i.0.',:...,.,.6•". a.,. . S ! f ,,.v.t,, .,4, r- .,,_r),..-.;-,,., ,,,•,, - .. " --• ice%k t '. / I 3 + � 1 11114C �..,-- M YX Iw�s�ue.. F i�d —zi '• 6 • 0: 7- < 4i,j 3* 0) co •— 45 cn ( = (I) 4-, C "- c Tan O C a' 0 cts cu cu — — CO cn in a L- L COO CD N O (� O L n▪� coL III criV •LQ U LL .�, 0 U }▪ , N cn . 2 a, Od •5 O � Na O U O E cr 0 Q) E) N c ili CO 2 ■- C.O �(7) LL 2 n= Q ill!)c1 VI rr^^o 6.AI . I • :o LL J 0 Z :.y 1 \ 0,' ••�, ift +4.0J o*-10I Q —���#F O ▪ o I U I CD O C6 ca Q. a) = — 1E O1 L co CO -t -- O a) = can CO C +' c0 O = a, O Q U a) 0.)m O I_ cc L. }' - 0 • O — -c C . ,a) = _, cr, „N o ,_ � ci) _. toO U C rn a) co v) 1Ea) *— Mown, vca = - C RI j -0 -0 O . o cn _ 4 a) a 7O 0 = 0 ▪ l co cn cn •ca o O >, U (a cu p z c �•. O a) • O 4--' cn -0 -- c CO a) a) L_ = a) _ � -C D Rf CO o U O Li_ D U cn U co Q. Q —•, -C Li_ ▪C coC ., 2 , p 0 Q_ i �= Q ;qt. U A E2 (a 0) U O a) E 73 ',tart 0 (a O O c u) N }' m O u) — 0 O c - -t ccn (4 > rn o 0 •0 E8 0Cfr, FIN _ a) Q O L. O C (a Q o o O • • • CO (7) • • • • • ° — < U) • L 0 �`�p,CN b/�d // O e r?� ` `>_ ry;z1 Z •%2 4w'..'o 11 \ ,; 2 C —..E../ica 1 To 0 c' uiN o — = N C 13 gi 0.) 4/23 a) •- .� (a O 0_ N U ai E vi N C N - E _ O to •� N 4) coN 5 N E _cC N }' .c (13 CO p O O 0) C a) = = N +' �Ca D _c fa N }, C cy) w O N o O X CC L_ 0) -0 N m co U O_ O O 45 OnO02O C = N C0 L. O- O > ▪L 0) O O a- O ( O) Oa 2a '- N U N O1 Q = .2 1--2 O N C -, _ O co 0a Q Od LN(a O al O N 0 4- C -I-0 C ›NO � a) ▪U C a O C lz' Q U O N Q(inpZ : N N •-N Cca C co E } a) E � 5 a C17) o_ O co • ctS Na O N OC N N = U L (a Oca co a) LCVO � 4 . }, O O N p 6 = .N OL O C co -0 a) U O CD. L Co . is 2 N N cu N 0 O C o CCr) C (a 72 N c N L o_c a) — . O cn Cr co(a Na)■� = C O N • > L o - O Co N C — N= C N C NC N N N ._ —.E1 NN a) = 0O — O N L > (a ( E72E o c O E_o ° o � � oo ° NX � "000 _ Q m Ta) 2a_ .c0_ U1Y . a_ cn0_ .= = 2 - Q n cv cii LU ca ti• 6 rn _ P N c ,0 �F;,.•••......,,,,,dp i. �: ••*,> o = o 11 moo:0 6. o cn N 7) N 2's2 �:Ciibb J1 N TO C \y `w �' III �a (3. Ea) c370 11� pEkP;#0 o oZ 2 co a c (2 Q QU t.D tQ Z v OoZ ' N ca �' I C CO O .� C - CO ° rn o as E Ce 4-. ao O • O a) O) C.)a) ( 0 CD CL Co _. . CD U I 0) Q CO E 0 ° Z Cl) o •— o � a) •c •W �, c L- _c O •v , °— N ♦, N > To Z QID V ° Q .. co- O� a) p a)o UJ a) a) _ c i C ••— 0 0 D '- � I o U o CU a) a) -v _ as 47, of , _ o .ED •- }' _ cc W C 00 N Q 7 � o LAin N N N N Z � � CC CC = I Q .O r-I r 00 lG Q 00= VD 00 OM N en Z O co' N N Ln M IX 2 2 GC 0 O O Oal N O 0 ++ p c4E . 00 N N H CCI U 2 ; O 1 W C -1 a)To on tt t/� tc n a) O co 1 c Q Lr) O 0 NN I I� 0 N.LID O '71- 0 N r-I c-I t/} -VI- A"' CID >. li ■— 3 `_ 2 u- ilmilO o o C O 00 O cz 1O 1l P) I `� N O Ln oo = 000 0) N O N 0 o to U v co (, CU 0) - o D O U E O c w E 0 N o U Q, OL 0 0 N > o e 4..; • l'1 r..... CO = r, ... 0 . ,, .:,. - gla bil ill" CO O p ti O A. = N co Q p • iF M E i in >11 a) Ca r's E (I) +0, O Ncp lielliiirPo a) O N N L 0 up J 0 0 � Lo a , 0 V == N C tiLo 2 = O csi Q / O V 00w Z EN • _ •_ Ce 1 01 C Q " ' Z C I OcD a. e4 0 'U.) a) C ccPCH' b/Nbo :'•• •• yam. 1 z;o "•~ 1 rVr k -3z1 ..2.... 4;:vo 11 '.y • 0 ......... 1 10 0,*/`i� E Co L 0) E O 0 L 0E 0 ._ N CO N CtS 7 C 0 O N LIN O cn ,*- 01) O a)U _o o o CO o Q U L fl +' c to Q U) z fn 11 c co qz E o N (71 92 a) c.)(in 0 U ._ N C L N >' c /� L. N II -0d) W �, co N L r L A E = L C co U 0 co CU o N U C a)C C N N n CD a)E E lai0 -0 _ 0_O Q) O Q ca U O CD -0 o O = CD LL1 . 0 0) N Q W 2 (/) 2 2 .10 s.... •— = .u) N 0 I lf ;Iles :• •• .yam\AO 11'� a o's �\< — :2 \.• -: I-- % • c. 115. y• • C, 1 Z %4 % k s 0,.._<<, A 0 `44, 0%T/`1l Ce ±E' E (a a) O N N G) c 0- .,c4 >) o � c -oca U — N L Ua) -rd O N E O) . O C -ow U > E N OU ^ Q �= (u U CU E c E v v) c 0 N co o13 O O 0 C y—cu U E as >, ,, U O O Z Q � � C co cu v) N 2 Q. E O O N O c� 2 U N N +, O Cl) w 'in Q O) i 0 (� L >' I c_ O O co to C � � \ in O >+ E c6 �' •= to _ C c O - iQ) 0) a) XO m2 O U0 -� O X (1) ad O O 7 'X _0 N co uj 0 03 (1) ' 5 a) VC ONa) C C =c c • Cli O ( 11 O C Li- a C ÷' C O coN Z _cZ }, Q a 1-1- i., ((Jo) N C Q. Q c +, O O NU Z U)N p �O L � ON = 0E >, c N- -CN ( = c\I 'X c � V Eo a) A.. ON. No -# . n asNz to • • • 0 a- U .=(i) C .2 Q CI) — Q . CD CD ■_ V) • • (n • CO N 00 `�p,.. bl Nb Ntith 6 Lo:? " ""--:. , %.•c k r o -'Z 1 • -v 0 ‘Y ....... 73 C d) l f co a) A . (t, � � .; ■— a) (n O Q v� 73 •� ^ AoeS W E .— .4- -0 Q 13 CO - > CD- 0 D- _ Q N c2 -6 _ 0 < a) c Z Ta ca o 2 0 U "2(i) (1) .c) 45 a) 0 ai 4? Q W0) a 0 2 73 CO0 a) 17- ,-,= t.-- cu 4nr)a) Li LO Ci) E 0 v 'L M pU N � U tul` N O L0) copL (� ti NU .- - 73 > -6 }iO3 .- CO a O rN co co> } c o C v p W Cl) C C -0 LI) -0 Q) N U 2 H Ociln) OC21 > O H ar � � — Q �-0 a) om o . . . CL0 CC . . C N- c\i c i 4 N ,--. . r. L 1 ei p-'nei 4 - ? (-) ki L') 's Vak.' ,., :- 1 . t u 1 Lanot.dom ie, , 4., t; Li Lo,..,o0 ' T 0.enoorlq 11_, o -,.. •. E .., i.. 0 A Mit,)10 (-4) •-• 4/ ;', '34".3 a sew ma"0 % ' c' 1._ ,,, m , u4163 px,,,,,,uNo,..s ka er, L,,v,,,„gt ( ,, i_.....= 0 0 q (..d t,-.111e .1 `'' E 1 ii°' Err 1-11 1 I. M ,.. , 21 2 gs w . '5 Lpeee 5 1 riirli ntAie Lpeas I 1 Atli h 44 6' = g 1s A ri c t.8 .-,A., i A =t 8 ±-- ka Ponvyea a Lie 6 L ,C- k v L.p._ it,:ie joe,,,,,o Lit;01k.tzi i 0 ucue El l-1 -1-1I] I 7711E 6 i-vr Hi 1 LI3BGEAmreag _.;14.. 2 i_Tr4_1 p...1 I= , g 1 i La 1E11 rs ,16 Po . In .-imin 4. 1 1 uneau M • ,-:,:g En _ LJ e s r, } :7 wit —1 .1 1 !__. IIIE4 1 IlLtil°n ( I -in'garb i i E 0111) a) e. $ C ff, , IIVI In Jew • ommilka ti Cl) 0) WI ir ti 5 5 1 5 1 in win M 0 I 1 ! ia4 ilk 1 i 0 0. i . ler ul wom i cNi ... CN1 IOW 1 f. •12 , rL" a) el N -I-%,I c 4-• v.. imisCU Z co, o ci) CES e 1 .... ci) 0- cp -a .c.) .-P _0 -0 `—' s_ u j a) im = —,,, O ,t (00 — •- ...., 7 •—, 0 03 a. ...=, 0 Im.. = > ni E •— _ c a) - T-.) co < = (i) co •_.. t. ..,, 0 •„,- cn 4.1 a) -0 a E u) a) IN ti co ;-1 cli < ......... 4_ •_ vz = cc) --, a) o cu m O E 47, a3 nw — _c = 0c •^ > CD .1..' 13) CO (1) 0 0 0 Cti CD li). w c _ 2 — -i-, CZ U) a) C)) (1 ) . 0 a) >, -a 1. U-I 0 C A 2CCE=") 4-CO1•7,, (,O" '— _ a) C0 aC1) .-E(I)W cc Q. — a) (D Ca_ 0au— _0 — -- ) 3) 0_ =- 21 > 0 < J2 < a2ZCcoU c(Cwo.O.)CCI 0 0 = = _ -a • • • • • • FIIIIIIr• , I .:,, •,:,,irml!,11 4,9,k ri - / ..4,.." . • • , :., . ,- IV, • . 1'..„`.... , ,--+-,..'''•-- i',,:p , • '1,---' 4. i;. 1A ,_,. „?....y':. 1.. ' r ''.% '..i ;'1';a '.4.r ' M 4 / --,..'.1' ' ...,..';.--'' '4, I- .--- _ •-..s..:1• -.-- i t 4....... ‘c...; i I ' (1-.., • , ,,,....;..:.. :,....,,.....7i-..«i:...,., •4si, F. 9....:- ..74,.:......,-A..,,-...«.-,-- ".„,,,,;.,,,..,1,,,,,,*....,:•:"..::, ;_.i.,-,,, ,. n .,-,•:`,;;;,A,,,,:i,',?"'t';',...,,,,:^ti,'.....'. : .--,•..., • c:;,;•. • 1,,,,t',' LO ':•••yki.„,Vik,•,..ku• .•.- '. ''''''' ''''''' '';'. -; '.•0 74 '','.;.,...me.,,,,i:.*- ''... . . . . . , 1 - i . -.41.— .. ,. .. ,. .• , ,, ••• „. .. ',7'• ----. • •• ' . — - • ' ',• 1 , • •,*:, , , • ...:.'e I . — - • I .• •. ,.., ,k......1.., . .„, ' 1..$ 1i$,•,,.".-: ''"''''.:. ; ',E , '444111 • ,'', -4..t.:•;-- .',''As s . . . . , •• 4. i',11 LI II 's '«• . ii' ••;, bid " ' ' '.....":""', '''•-'''': ,ts,' 1 11 1‘,' 11111, , ••,, * , I , • .. . ,,,'V'‘'," . .•; " s'sx.'''i II '''''' ''',.: :„ I f ,, 14,,;) '••.,Ill..,11. II -. ..- '4 ' -- • 1—.' ' , .. . ,.. . , I, ! i / . . . . , ,.. r.T.!. ,s .t. ,:. . , I ,.. ..., ;...,f, ,./ . .,,. .,.'-t."",,,,..:4 .........„-- - a. ,. 9 4 • • _5555l s •".'•''• ',• 1 li';'',, .','•4; . I.', .ri•.. ,' ' . , '. I ''s• "!.1) 4 . t . , W 'il," ' • 44 i.. •'' e--4, ••-, • . , i ri, ., ..„, '. 1611 1'IV 1. ,..,.,,; ..,,S. •''', .: .. - .. r' , i• ' t .. S. '.44,44 r i . ...:21 1-;',.. !. , ' •, 1 I ,.. ' •!,i' o 1 - a - 2 a • 11 I .,.I / - O V I .,t « al u _ r SiI.I E [I' ,. 1, ., 1 Is [z iCII $0 y I [} � ti o n i t 1?.. � - .—_ a�`) !d! �1 E F " ' ii ai il,1i, iii LIE -- ' 1s al}IHHa 1.'0 gypm a w Nil I'i L Y it II lit 1IIIi !1 ' • a) ,, a) C 0 ■— = .cN a) (1 N 0 13N co 0 N co (13 O OU a) O CD cow > L _ •- >, 1 Nto - /�� O U Q L W .— E — .0 o T 0 a) N _ to COU �--� i o amL. cn •— •- = � ti �� c >, o CDO L'" o x 0 n c ° o u cn 2 N (n •(0 . = a oo uJ a cn c 3 •cr 2 w n Q . . . a) cii I '1!3 opuOV to u i uosdwes n suot �] c 7 vq Sgewc 7 6 5.1 I T.1�'r A �' III - @1]ink :� pagy}oo , -ill iag1 r- 0, `� 7 y \ it� 'ul euoya ul uoP��l ul almg y ;>, U U) Q O g in es - - � , �� �o s'ul°6�I1 L 2 60-90 a ,..3 ca L. �� � j w N — J O = -ji uo31a0 jogs ■N •ii0 6onaN o .ul Iles unl o 1 CC Sim LCO a F o C 0) V c 00 o � 2 D) CU _c (13 = ..--. N ._ � °) �' 03 (/) O E— 0 N -0 c �' _ ri, ° coQ .N _ CD oN _ > '4ao o ()pa)N D O � voi (� N � = 0 ' O N moo -° w ° - C' � N boo � � � a) ° � x 1_ Q c c o c O.64 O • W � sa9 •LD � Qa filO O a) < Z = a a . . • I --N N 0 O O I N c a N O , : Z 2 u < 1 Q. 5 2 sennueptT e - N E J! V3 L 0)._ c o C co Cl) ' cON O O p — O a) a) N 0) 0 0 - L _ _ a 0 C cu ■— - 'is oO 0 cn -a }' cD b) IO ♦ O Q o "„r � o a) � U) 0- p) p OU .U /� m LL 6 .C -.E.0 Ti) O C a" W Cl) > — oN = a) o cu_ o CO C N W L IVi0 4__ o -0 1s, - (..) --a-)i (I) au)) cf) - 0wco0co cn o p a� .° C� � JQ 0 x L o _ O 0- Q = 0_ 0_ 4 W . . . < 0 Lvt v 1 , „ ,.... . ; - : — - gb ..., •.,\ 1 • \\ •. ) 11 I i ! -'.....' •.^',,,Alb 1.... ''''''.'rj- j:•''l •. ! ' ...A. 1 , , 11 . ,1 • ' _ - - 144 ....__, 1._,,,, . ,. . ---- ---___„..„._,........._________ r 1 '; i''—,-,‘ ' ."'.„ 1 L ...:„'s ' - — , ''','' 1 1 .• —,..,.1..,p lb.:gm-- ..,„,,V- , luut-, -4,--:: ..• .•1 . `.,two) 1.,-,0:,..1,T,....:11...- t .w ..- i 1,-.--.1it— ' limit, ,. -i-,-.,? I'1,--, .." _i 1 • • -. l''*--- gli. ,I-., .7,-.,..a!lid, - ,,-- - -, T . 1, ii....A. ...-7,---,,--, i ,,, -2,- •111,-- -.'Ari - 1 , r-1 ,,t) •- • . I f r"i• —, ,.. ....,,, 4 I -- • .. , _ .. I/ „. , .. . I , ' 1- , , , , „,,, ,',...4tV,` , ., :, •,111 1 i Av / - .4•::\ ,,i,:•'1",„,‘ -•44',:' ...7, if* ' , . 4 r,• A ii I, 1 • r 'S •';5'i-1.4....* ''.‘' k...:i '''C i 1 . , -7"r-•''': — -.."...114.;"`:‘,, '',1 ' ....._:-....4-7,1„,. .. _,-..-= .....,_ ,,,,,,,- .. ... ...,..,..,........„ .. f..$-,..c. -4,..ii,.." ‘„1,.., \ , • ;:..v.4,1.•:=.1-4001_r.,„„,,,,, ,f• 1 \ . , t.,',-, 1:,,,erei,..7,74701,:-,....,,• ' ,..*. ',„, o, ,:,.,„ • .,, i 1„ tr•.'‘, - ' ‘141 NP 'k i / 1 i. . t) I . .i , 4,jtil ., 44 ,... ,, f C:4: ?', '''`,':.'..c-e..i' .` — S LI, ""7 4 .. _ . -- Cus v S' cu Qo o :5Ci .0 0 -Ia al chi e- r 4, i . (1) © 1 S- i 1 U i m i ,, ca (D ., 6 ,__ 0 1 ..., N- }sannueploo r Onikki 0 0 N N O . = O L co �_ � � I, Q N L L W c ^` W L I a) Q O p co > _0 O 73 a) O C 0 CK, O N •c 0 o 0_ N 0 Q U) C a) = a a) o cn c V) v 3 ccacuUU -0 "2 a) eL a) -a a) — o a L.= L co •0 0 cl 0 .n IC) C �, a) C cn QCL U L . -0 Wa. (/) + • _Oc N _ L a) �� . va) -o ocn o U XI ca CON a) +, }' ca a) -2 CO 14.4.11m N 73 W . o A, C ••- o ca ) c0 a) p �- U -0 Co L o � = oc) cot co ; aQDaQaO w -a0_ 0 = iii 161 < 0 ;se uepioo -a CO - as 0 Silverbit Ln. c, Co N a NIc L Fai, cress 2 0 O 0) � Ln. H Q -�=m York 1_<`- I ==_� =_-_ is .ui ioagalpp' N _--- C CC 0. >, 0 0 > c O ■— O o (a O N a) OM I CD a) co_c Cl cc � � L — cn 0 -0 V) +-� (1) M d) > CD co N (n U •o C7 u E c W 1 N E N c Cl) - - N R I N. -O o C U v (a 0) 0) U a. a) w (n Z•� N O v) CO o V Q C N L E 0 0 0 (a Q OO EO W �+- •o i U cn co co (a co ti o (a o O � 0 0 N � C � O � a.., U L U o O (n Q o 0 ? c O U (a U O O- M Q o 0 .� � = � Q aQco � O o .� N O = 0- Q. . . . . . . . . i • •x L W a. CC W , a e ik - dMildiii" i, . : ,,..,,:, ...,....;.-4, . . , i ,, , hi, f.,,, . '..4. . r LT! . ...-....* i r: ''. '!"' -t . , , , . ,, - ... , . ..c.7- 4.. ,.. ,...,..• . .. . A • ' ' , . . , • .• k .... ..._..... .4.4 . ' . . I A, ..,<‘•-lyt,,, •,..- .... „. ____", la,• ., I ,,, tit "I •,\'-„, r . . ; k • -. .1...r.— , ----- ,...., " , '-40,1 ••''''..- „.., -;-- . . .,'i -k,- = • - • .1.,,4,, -., . ., ' • '17!..' il':.,:•-14 ' .; • II 7 ' • • 1. ;-, L.-. iip _L... .„.,...'-,...:„.,..‘,.,..‘,..,,,,;•...., '71' 11.4.,-4,,,`• I , .. .. -,, •7-- ' ---- . . .. :.- .. .,: i\ , .'...::'''l.. . ,•1....'''''''''. yI.- 6.- V .- ..,' ' 1„,_ :. 1 -_i `'...'..-'''' .,',, -,-,';',7;,''',:b-••-•%.1....--.--. .„ ..1 , . ,.. ,. _ _ ''' -':'^--.1_,.7.1S • ,.• ,.;,,.."77'..;,..-,-,;:-.4.,--7.'„.";;.'.::-.',1!!....-e:i. - -• -,;v..-,. , ''„ ' ;,.It-•_:. '15.1.. * , - 1 .1:.-4.,,,,:-.1',- .:;:,..,1,-----:!,--- . Z.-'t,..:';'•4•7417.7, - . -,-,„-. _:', . 4 ,..,..,„.... ..,, ,..,. ' 1' ...t--,... 111 ' '-:,:.:-,:...,,•'-', :j7 -..7"' , 7 ' ... : 4,, . :•••••••• - 4-... ,_,. '''„t •.:-1:. ' ,,• •,. ••774,---,---• ^7:mr„-, .1!.,.. , -`..7 , 7-- '•'-''•:-: ..ilip--"' , w .l', •''' L., k...., L, L.,--.:.''.'ll,. t' - '''"-•''''''" .,,.,.. f • , ' 1.,.y:- '..14 t'.... '.,': ';'" ,..... .414.4.70!?)- ; , 7 ' '4.x's,..' • , ''.7 - 4'''' ^tli r , • , .-"' ,i • , ..',. '•••'' 1 ''' '* . ;.(:' .ii4'."•' '''.7.3.,''..' A„„............. 0 ,s,1-1 ` .. blNd .. „, .... /,‘ •1 qy . o.. 6 L,_ 4- 4 /-• z,., . ---, ',O 0 zo • t Cl) �� " t ti 7z�� w ( ■� n, a) .. 4.113 aR��,II 0 - O ft) o < (1.) >, co 4— O 5 c6 E o 0_ E -0 a) O 0 RS c a) w ; ° o C CZ - -o 4) 0oC a co E L. S.-1 L O L. o_ 0 c c� °0 •- -0 ._ u) a) c u) . (..) • 2 E a) •c_ }. > .� na) 4) c SO - 0) rn L L W N 'cn O v co W in O O 1 c a) c •w 0 O N 0 C CO= a) 1) �c ■— O > co O -0 w D ti) 1 (1) -2 0_ s') --63 a) o o o >% 0 Q � O H Z QC303 _ . . . N 1` M H _ N ,— N 1,- , oo_ ;:cr) 1 CD o a) 0 •— i Q 0 c = O or >II a) a 2 ? O M 0 0 N- CD CD ♦� p c D N N CU L. oAlma N (n 0 0 J = 1` v- O ,I. in Q N � � Z JEN 0 �= IjI :D_ IX 01 *U? -o CI) Z C 0 0 4...1 0 _ - 0 ca O N 0 'N 0 .Q to 5 Z Q, •Q = 2 > - .u_ „ Z Ca 0 Ce Q C. Q = H W ti a) -o (n > a_ 0) o o .c O 1 >= C — � 4) a; a) _0 a O Z o = ( ci)' O c a) a ,_ �� Z 0cn > o c � �� 0 Oo� 0 c L_ � Ooa • �� L. � � — a) OLo a)co E 0 C EE5 - — > a) }'^cn E 0 ID —o � � o La) c E E a) (Dv) ,c .( O� vo 0 O O +� O.C.N N >, 0 o oI c2 o —F o (l) cno •- a) a) cn05 �Q O g O L� � � � O �Z _c) a) � O 00+� .4 Lo Q Q . g-2 Q>, cn C6 E 0 0 � � E—.— ca 0 cn (+.0 = mr, (p_c Ld (! (no ce)Q �•7 u73-0 E� a) .n Q 0 a) U clo , (zO o t/�� E CIS — a3 � � E " � 00 O O a) � 0 �o a) — E U L CO >,, O N (a O m(i) 6 O 2 } OO � a) �o — ZOo Q 0 OOME v OIL Q Q Qca.— Zcaa. 2 . . . 0 2 a > 0 0 Q O lissi 2 O - N o ,, aQ O CtS C u1 er'. m z OJ w O y� o 0 0 0 0 e o e 00 0 0 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 II waft Z O E . c4,,,, cu E O Q) 0 Cll Q 0 c (6 LII i o CD E E co O a) O c U E O c NRI 2 CD.O O 0 looft, a) Clo JCO •- O U) NICD co U O Co C Ci3 CD O = i- O I"-- NI > c Qj 0 II ti oc Q O E O Z coo O ftCIAi X O O Z co I� .- Ct cc 0 c c 03 E d rt 10 • o. 1,- ,, CD'•QO 6•'v \\ N - it zj % r o \ y• 1 Nik •, 0, • z 11 0) }' E = i o c13 _ ,C L.) c o co ° O u LA J = U s - 3 e c lU V c Tu • c 0 •> Q, s., N Q ._ ,.., L._ cy) E cu , O a w cu.• a) cl L) O o O o o Q N .� �, 0 _ aco >' C O + N -O in Lim CI V Co °° + 73 o E LL.I N i c c t N. _ O Q a>) 0• 0_ • N uctC 4 O • L co a--' tio. v Q N �O ' ca■= d) E cu m U O C V) 5 i �, c� 0 0 W � oc30 Cl) ` tit) V L a) f9 a) iii •> 0 L ©©, u— -E , t8co Ce _ O N m- •cn O N Co W °' c c E _ (� _c Z cu - co cy) O L CC W -„, 8 a n N c U urn I — E aTo2 a) 2 -§ L �� ZJ I' co U N Q vJ O O 4) .� • E = E O } co c 0 c •L E +' N 40 E ..-_,. (,) (Co O N ca o I �, N +, +rICC co N N N = l = -c c v c o Q• O 0 = 4- J N c� 0 C X � (n NQ ® QaS � o ■� co N a) .2 co a � E � 4 O '- imm U U L. 0 - •= a I V o '>_ °N' }' c N cn L W •- O ,,�+� U � m �oL J oco •alQ- UO 2 = cu c ` ) Q" (n N CO . • • O Q ° a -c4— o ��PCH• b�N��� // ....,,, perI 1 ' • '• yi 2 6A C Cie)LLJ •— . , '? ^. CCI J � • = C....) iy . ; , i= V, v gyp.'• ..�e:C o C x = '�!3 OPiI O N ":ii....- �1 O CL u C ....IIaU 0 U ICC N Q1 C 4- C.3 C) O = Z C � � . , . a N 114 L._ j C O su 0) �� Q QJ a) � = N Q) _ QJ C, Q) co E ■— 0a) I Obi) to QJ L.L� C 41 N t1A C o c2 W co_c t = Q C., § -0 v O Ce o C ` U � C..) ( Q) I . 4-' mim. CD O E _0Q cu CD } = 0_ on • 1 0 fo O a QCOCC a Ti 1 JcB tp U a-E g)) Q V U C O O iN E m N i QJ U N O QJ C C U O N fa J O CD O C C U C -0 v, y_ Immm O cB QJ C CZ (n O a C CC 'I-' -0 — N Q) W >' C v Q a � c _ O CO• C CO C U C C G.) v, U CO 11•12 1-6 V+ QJ 7. .- C/) co v U a L V) Qr_O D .N 'a..i C iiro 8 2 S .v^ ///i.......„ it ANyN— P / I • z C ? • '... Cl) Io =' % ,,- 1 � 0L. �s CU . 'c> I ••.•c / `= c a3 z ��...rii// c -C = 0. U N co u - OU z Co o �. N o U R3 i O Co Q N c RI o c� I o •Q L 0 COo 76 'E I— 0ct3 0 ma> 4-4cV0D0--o)' E((11)) 6. E c) u O Z C Q N 0 C WN aU 04 N C c s aimm)i ays) (..) N i _� c c QCa) 3 _ � O ...z 0 0 Vo z .- _0 ate-+ C C4 O ' N N N ,,-., () O 4J N co a) 77_ c CD -0 - o it +-' • i--- o •'- --0 -Q : CO J� > co a }- in O " 4- 0 O CC a) - •4 �' �O N W >MI tap a) V) •_ ,, ._ +_, •0 ■Z W _. cB .— '_E ,„ v, ,_ 4_, ' aQ Ut >� o 'p _c:„ EL v > ZIzI1 0 E cu - J •O W u p .o o_ o L .000N 'N aJ ..z 40 '6) 2 .V _0.17: Q ." C Y 4 n a ' a • al g t p qi o - U 2 N E c sz a 0 E Y Y M • E 3 • z w �iz Z m VIZ • .... ` 0 _, ��� ,+ 3 # Z 2 ..,. W O `Ya ZV :t — _ III I , ' o ` SZE QN gr � JW cx m • iii• 0 Z ti teir a . ar z0 J } 0 C Y Z • n G I II e � E vs ..: was x Q o 0 3 ,' ,..,.., k R.ua� . :"ems,' ,:: J - °' o o i _ a. • z c d 3 C °ems::,. E• N o a (J N C X a V O > ip L L 52$ W Q7 yaa U S n n -• y : P. Eas 1111 s Q 3•0 4 w V tV H U Cl x if F. e G 'a i n 0 V O < ..+�... . N wO CC L G c Ai cQ ' 4a Zwh a ��,� v. CD Z • (/)_ � N ' .'. 2 LL.. itior 0 41. Q Q g. J LiJ P 9 mu .Mv U. 0 CD Z arm ,� ...r.• sr- Z_ E *t --,,444111k7k1 -4-3 1 tt, , .... U..1 2 V = 01 o C 2 d - N cur'+ -., o I n ll ' m J o 3 r pY . 4 ....._. Q W �l p v _ z 4 c ii .t „...tea` s .+H:1_,...............t\—. • A .,.., Lu 2 4 „.�..,„.»..... �p p o ` �1 a m H O ,, o E + n r �. su N x i u " m E o x E L O O n v S. ., O O a t I V N i Cl V 1 0 4. 113 �cp,,H b'lNd : • '• o ,. 6 1 V' i Q 6 Z 's T-IA Y (n 'd Al CU 4-1 N y .... s *, %0e CO = "0 06 cn _0 C a) U .2 LO O Q X O N O E v g �'x ii CIOen (1) o �> W k' x 0. .ti 0 -0 /I W 0 - C 1 ■� -0 _C _ ! � �, PI 4- CD _ � — cn L v+ C - .� _ w CU = c6 ce 75 U N C) �/� _ •C bD bA U #, O N - — Q : i. V) Q — /. 'r alA i 1Cit C �'�— O ax O V) c r 0E L°- (>0VUI —I.f= ;' Q - W a_+ ate.., ( O Q) U : r1 0 o 0 O -0 N ,V` a) 0_ _c i s Ln 0 p i-0 /0 CHI y� I/�%cc,P ........... 0 11 �,`•' o, ij\ O o.. 6\ .Q1 co 1 1zso ~ -0 O t1A 1r' I -:z,1 ' I Q N > .X cu U .... 'L � o\P/II1 O a 0 = O cn — CID —0 CU t�A2 .71 ca C a) D 4 0 .O ca) O a O Q N LL _ b.0 U CU E N +-� +_+ 7:3 O >. co z, 0 .+-' U N MI O U O x N L_sa) (I °� 0aCU 0) Q _ co _ � Q N a) � z � � � oton IX Q = E _ � � •- N ° 0 t/0 a) v .c : C O- —0 ♦.r s °° L o au -o °' a) 5 a) .— c co }' Q '� 0 4 Ec C , . -0 4--j n-• v C oQ 0s � L- c0 E a) C E ;tj 2 E) .67 .4-2_ 2 -- E O _ L_ U o O a) 0 -a ,,, V O OCD co 0 CO p +� co• +J +�-' c c V C y a co . O • U .� < U • • C C , CU U -C 03 ro • Z � � 30 - o p -0ow a ` b U 4J j_ co 2 cn 0 4-1 ctS 13 OU E 4■11 0 (.13 Qco • E 0 a) E}' Q O Eszu 2 U 0 (n " = Ua (/) CO 2 i,n Q O aA t+ .NMI MO coIMMINI 0RS 0_ •� ■— -C V ) W bp O QI D U +� J f— m 2 cn tit J `, l0 a) -0 Imp, en - O a) 4-1IL r-I r-I O tan %—iE O C Q -a 0 ±O a) }, (13 CD NI al Q1c6 U d" a) a, c 2 - bDU lar4 -0 u co O �,) +� a) 4-1 +� ' a) � �CD CM �� _ W (J bp C-0� �w U j aco te-+ a) (I) � � tn— 0 C O N Q.\ Q Q) in Q) U O 0 m — I Q '� Q) Q) U� O �� oCI CZ UG UC6 L, ca . . • k.,, N ;It,.,:i- 1.• st , •,‘, Li., k -1 , „ ..,„„.:-. ,,,,,... .,,,,,zjA..„7,-1-.--i- . ,4144-41.„,1,1—,, , - - ....1w....,,,- ---- --_ "?� t 0 I�, ,'. , U ,.} .44 T33 pl _. , "-rr # C') " r' k 1� 0) 0 ik. M ,* # i--- N. c/c' 2 r,A, . ,,, .ram !,:tir l, •mina is CI D v m 0 2 to p t ii ii._ ._ co w ,.... N I.H ti -0 a-, a c I II $3 . -0 a L u 2 ,_ e _N H -a V h N a Q_ O O a) C a O 0 >. J c M 2 Y M I! 11 iii1 cn U CO "0 .0 EL C cu w to 0 Ln 0 to c F— O �CIS O u, .p e4 �+ U A as < 2 v - O c, 13 to Q 6 c Z ifl" •�• 2 a; > N 0 • . as Z U ru I a. O� 0 O O d ' p 2 2 >, Ce < O. < I U o < f - Ce 03 cB i ,. J i ,_ -O Q_ r O ° c cm 0 ' ITU. 1' U • O O N ' 1 z p2 co ' d -� Q .42 _ cv " i L. l7 a) co i 'Cl-am V Z •+, = `! -y-am? v Crw `n -0 i . , .064 0_ O CU e �p 4J a Li O 2 0 O 0.0 rAs ,K.. L_ a " r CO Uex, N a CC- D a N - N < c In V LL -Q ,Er(w) .g"..A ' + U 2 t -J c '' t " • ,. ; CT ,. -0 — c� c%'i 0 a as 0_ • ?' O c a n. cc � 0 ' - cn cn a Z cn ' 0 N 4-0 CL (I) (0 2 4 , U co -0 L a--+ ) O Ln N CU Q) O 4- > Q v. 0 >• -0 0 N OU 0 N N — N ' NI +_' v 0_ Q) Q) -0 -0 O Cu . . .- _o c v c 0 I v) S- o N +., (6 Q L - () 2 co tea) moo = +-+ N O -0 MO N ' -) W CO CC — +_, CMO v Q ■� L Q - C - O `0 c6 E `n 4A .c O N O L N __ — co c6 al -0 i) ca >. a X ro E a) (NI c L... - L.- c0 v co cn E N Ci0 ro D O O i co O v rt.„ 0_ L _ N U +-' >, N 4. L \ Q O „ _o „no 0 C6 > �' Q U = co N .— O L O co i) � U N a X U -c 0 cu cm co O a ' >_ - aO HOV)a) V DU im . O — N • •• •• • • • �; ; � ,I y U r-! .s .. b L Q) { ;-1 . Maine , if.4i C �� ti 1 t� n Q L.■ ■ dill y N CN a > -� - o- ,Oil/ `` ..., O Q Q w . OU ci- iiiii.H :. si .‘,. I ,, Aisle, -49 2.��.�� '.w�aafe► .1�1-'Afl.l if.' i1iI+'�!` co p a� � O U a) c O N O O c O E . ISIN aD >• c.0 O o 0 o •= 3 N T .0 .c -0Oa) i o �cLC -0 V O 2 _ laIll: 1I !E a) +, J O ? c/) Ov " II - • u = U w oO o L c� Q b J O111..CNC°C\11::-‘ p _ p O U g) > — v >• O v c 0) Cr) �' Q C N C .N fB LJ •U N = co IL 'L C Q >, E LL - O sy Q o v = m a 'o a$ < "' u a, o a� = a cn o o 0i o = Q to ro < C. Q 2 O LC < - I— c — • cv L- I :IJ I'El Iu Ln N !Okio ai U.; w Cl) Ind Nz cw„ E a' = Q `;Mlle ' -0 0` ° `- W — a _c CD ,r, R Lo Q J v °; -0 as 11,S4' N V , CU ID�, 4 N N C �` - 'a —C 0 U& CD _c N Jill! -o U v = cn c NIES' _ = a a V) CD O > c_ v _ w CC W U a) '+r N ai p O E a� t O `5e1 canOcaiim a cC _ciir u a) }+ Ln CA CNI LC) °X CD L >, ( - '�} +� oN bA ■ Uo •= C �-+ OC m ' 0 � Do N ON QO •- O -I a •X CU L U ' cn U ++ C a N C -C Cm co N v •� N p N %-i � w E "- E N •+-1 > C c6 a--+ m cc O �� m � � � � c6 - NJ a--' CD C }; . . C - -0 tap N a a_' = n� •o - 4-',A -cut) +�•+73 > 0 CL �� N E= 0_73 h .+•+ VD l-I 7 bA lab CO N tA C' CCD a O , a.� 7 0_ - o CO N v O O a; Nll . O \xcoC)� w Q > N > x C ."- (in ll Z CO v2 c13 cn p- _0-a o� rnC tf) U o rn oU >. CU E E 4-' cn U cn (cr.)) �C U mW CD 0 O col Cl) f li a i C -0 '� oz. I ,,_. ,,;, 1 • �-- s ., 2 ., 11 q^ 'l •' , AZ '1 L' ' ..''.' 114 I I illib I a mim 0 03 p''.-''''-' • 1 '11.-,..,--- .1'..;•'. MAE ME , • . .4,0, who 2 1 v-i t.14 _ ..lij:7 AV. ..: -•; ]Ilill 111 _ L... ,,.,,,S.:•ifi,• All.1 , 9 ,,,. . .: iradr2 Pa nil all _..., _ .,:g .&1‘,4 -7.*7' ' 'P'-'!-'r-fgf Era 11 Pima 111111111y cO .� r ...,, ..,,,,r, ow sin , iiii 0 1, (19- -41 •— : --- Ill '4■ Pi talk t. . el iC _ s �+IP pa,10„ ..-.., „7- - .,,-- . , rimenfirt�w rA � a rn o '2 crt t I,- I CV n 4.+ - � , co (0cy) M co is., N ++ 0ca • > C12 +N. O) i o - LE a) cn 4-1 2 E 4 Pliii), row ' CT) CV I 73 V C co O N- LO CO UI co in r0 > o 2 c O N CD 0 = u o N �, o _1 c • no C " C n N a N O }, v Q (./) O E L -, a) Cri a: C E w c N a o cn 'a N v c u) .... a +�, O •— to - L CD d C (l) = t; -0 Q1 N CD s- .o o W C� w an �, .470 Fes ; ,y C° L ._ >, G `t as co CO C C O < 0 d _ > C i. Q U CD Li_ 2 522.. 2 (, O o cu . p = — (/) Ct Q O- Q 2 U Q' Q H _c cn v O O u a O a O) es ,i�'•14$?ii1N14,11�®e i zt 1Vr.�"' 4-' qA O a Mkt MI Zia r. F - i U _ •in I , Q C dJ U U) bwoc lilt _. • - ,y ca = Gjii i _ E ca m 4 a o' �! Phi ^ i ++ i� �� E -� Z -0 a) C ._ * tti O Z L C N N _ • r L . ti1ir, 1�awl , • ` ' j,a 1 >. co Q J O ,r. 4.0 J CO (n rat a) IIIII5._ 9 „ � 1 t-N'• 4 N s O U C `_n X .a, Ivog ;, v► i o curl Aim �� �tl 1iri'Katy 0 u., no C w M � , � t .E - U >, cii a) a a) ao C f + —gip _ ,- ;. lii�1 ! W ce < ca w C , �" -� � ram, gja'.: E sm�_ilk !/ R of o co O E o a a 0 s_ cc o L = C 0 cn cn m ca a U V) CO m a) cc =06 = v dftell CD i a) cn Qo U +, U a) aJ N (a a--, = " co= > �>, ca in N a) C ro CD Ln- Np m m �N U ON O Na-+ Cl) a)= a vOQ }' Oa) l) U }' c > O v`ni a)0- N L CL0 a) a) CB • N (a N C/) ++ f� CDN (15 V) C6 X 'v 0 N co E CO b `n 0 C (n (n � N � Q = .N v Q N � �� � la) o a) ra = 4 co 0 � i s C0 mina = � +� = U N N N =�Q ez X Cl) a.) X O Cl) • -o Cl) +-' a) 0 Cl) co w V♦ CC w � = 0 Q �'in O Nicc U C . . . . • . . a) mit:$ ,.. r , , !,..,.—r.74,11 ,-t R. raktiii,bA, 151 = .-a)1 / witi, .. m' '1 �t `. less "' t l� `" CO) > l"ailjJ�� i:.,. ' 2 4 7- 4� ' •,Wf �F:K3'�' ,.a11� 2 m E n/ !4k .1a r---Ps/Mlyi ir 1,. � _ A - . e - , ._,,,,-,--,,--N u,,,, , -,-.,- .„,,.,.,.„, . !......,,, ,, ,.. - --,... ,_ nu. .. ,. og',..,:-‘.-4''''' 1 i„ iI�e' .4 '. .. CAW_ , . ev17 ±�" i owl I : ` , 'fir m a) = a) co C cc oZS U 4-1 co I NI = m ��—, L) — X OD m73 }, . >1 O C C) 4J vi c6 N vala ? N N i >- X 0 5- UL.L .4J cts cU r(I) i N v� co �o U }, U a) Q.) v) .� +' 0 a) a.)co co= ).1- .-I-' o,... > co 0 >.... gi, 0 0 CM u .2 u m co �n N � a v O Q O c� m > 4- >, >� O ate+ Flo Q O OLn a)a ") L v v (o Nc fB V)(f) a.., co 'Q) v) CD a C) N > N C- -• O >. (n fp '� v) cn vier nA �n a) N B C N C CD Q = .4J v QN -C a) O �.., � Ono -0 - 73 Q� �\ C > E >< a) 0' co13 cc x 73 v = o 4) 7 v O U w CO Q O Q 0'cn cc cB ry .Et , ,... TEE'S:, i 1 ,,,:,,,T1 - ..t.-.: CI) n1" 1K ; ■� - -- Ink' .�� • - '� � L n 1. wit oINES: mil i MN.I;. In a 1� . V9iF111®111� a l ?mow RIM 3!� lar al M1HuI 1111 Qti CO c O Z O •1— _ +-.t _ bz Q 13) CU o CD i CD "rt E +0 I ~ O O p I` v p M �. N N O CC _0 Q O C r= p) ;-' — O C O D co N N LL C N ro aJ N 0- cm C C v ,_ CC) IZ co U >. to J D N' U — N .; N -O N E v' CD tl 4J ::::Eocci ' et Li) NO co O N OD a N Jco c OLC> VCrd4J OO � p co C d Q T.-1co cn C ii N +' CU 0.)C cop C X +�+ d 4-4 . co_ .n N o Ct co co o = CI. 6 CI n O O O p = to 0 4 a. < I U ! ' I— ce c ' L O w i �.( , U cB C _0 lar' CO C a. \ O O l -0U Q 4-4c -0 v 0 \ O v) U M Cr) I n XI O L- { +' QJ N cn C M CJ Q O .— ++ ++ \ T LO - _ 9- N p N v) Q> CO O N 'O !�aea���a .7J. I ; �+ 0 — f� € C CO� C Q� d)�F�ta)' t CO 4J O lisp, N Fi ". b e _ 1hal 4J {vs fin f! > N f0 LL. ( (n �' to a 7 i-1 1 77.I I_�'] = iCU > C!1 C Q>J O c u v C aJ v U Q. ^ !01 Q 0 0 Q 0 Cn N i1 •` 0 v .- U — =CO N I\ -I-' : CL n aA >o D co � - v C —0� U -0 cri-1 E co O O O 0 • +_+ N (1 OV X CD CC CD �' � � NCU L N U chi! () •N CD i Ql i G) O CO I_f) (6 --; co c > -0 4- >•• N E co N _c 0 a) N = O 4—' cn cn i t1A +� L '- 0 OCO ,a.) 0 >vCN � ■� 0 > -c U (B INC 4-, E co bb co CD O 0 cc}e v N tvO I ! iH CJ O- Qa) - . > (13 ci)0 0U ,N v W co CC N L ON 2 cc cc O5 I- 0 a) L co a) . .rimM.i:r..:i.6...-.1ri 4,,,,`",:1.k-,'',.... ,,'''' '..,,,'' ,,,,,I4 a) >it fi . n ��,�, -:. I. - L 'aim. _ e. . a - C ,,II, ` `.'_ 4,0 v =r 'C _ g' ■ lar��� �, a �. �+ :�<■� ■ ■ c�■, aye � , ■ice t >, - ' i 0 163146,4 It - i -,^+r ' a 'Y icy! 4...- S D ,P:9Ylf' t Jh j O 1 a - al OMNI M ., ::,:,-,- 11131P11111111JI 1 :'. "'-''.Y- II- ' 5- 1. iris 'Ad L 1 co M as Loll 0 N N }' C N- 0 coV' -0 FO— D V. N r--- o d) N _L. N O , PP to E O O 0 C c) CI 0 0 0 U N Q O C = 0 -0 -0 2 - I 4) rim Q +, OIli 0 0 ti cc 0 0 ._ ; 00 N 0 00 O sar)=0 iN a N) 2 NN O O O 0 o c r' : c - - N N lf) CO O .v -o L. U 4) 0- _C +-, L I p -0 4 = O 0) c N C . > y 0 4+ O r �. O • O co O c - b.° F- O .4 O N En .CZ Na) L.) -0 t6 — Q I- d > _ I, Q C c Z c, •-. n , c N p (4 Z O •— co C 2 !1 OL 0 O O a) p 2 L ate, s= a) ce a s Q I O W < I~ Ce > a) ° o �' c -C3 0 n -0 C.) c13 0 0 M � > n t cc v v 40 'a i) U C Cl) L C o Q wa CC E \ .J.1 Q) O = N .= C. : _ 1 G> rafi6'Ma -:1 i1 Q C _ Cl) kiiici , '+ R. CD ,O — Z ' v, C[ N CO M. WT. _ 7p Erg rertiintV CU L w 0 i'� r ... O L +, CO C Lu 0 a O �' E N u uQ UN O .c d d GC -C c, 0 V) v, La a H as 3 i ! •, 110;r r• p'frl'i.0 ci "'( }I i- }F I t e j � -�i) 03: t .^«E „,,I ' I.. et � ` I c ,- ___ - ?„..1,,.:...,3,_-t7o, 1,:1,4„,:".:_,;,,,.,.iiii•,.. Nu I C _ . . , f_._; ..•• .,. •- ' '. I _ « ' r R 4. 1. L: ,fir I_ _ f a) . , _ , , •,. ....., - a--+ U a ate., L NC `~ U N O U a) L_ O � c O L U �. �� •SON O •> � 0 .0 � CD v c6U N L- a) E 0 • O > `� 0 Ciol) s- 4-1 bA•�, _a > �' C O L- +,, - c6 cu. > Oa, O O _0 v Q0 � v �•N +-1 O .- • +-JC -0Q -0c S.- cn O > C > c U Q zcu a) CO ° `4--0CD v •> �� i w � v mL +� wU O c U 0- 0_ — ■ ■ on,i }, fB — c6 O C) Q (D W N C 0 Q+, c 0 I- 0 C •c/- a--+ o C C a= 0 N 0 O � � v E � �� = O }, +-+ O O -1-+ t 0E a--' C .N C -0 O O N > QwUN CD >' Oco " a = E co o■ Na , 0_ 4Jlimo +-' Q U vL C� +-+ OOCD C - C Q =—CUO � �cn � � n a) � 4 + U N •= O 00 = • O N +� 0-)Q i U2 U co C.) Q cn cC . . LL . . . 0) ■NMI L = CC — .N N .e Z %-I p Lc) N CO 01 ( ) = 0000000 C 0 I , N o 0 0 o p 0 N N N N N N a--, N N Ni N co 2 0'> O z 0 0 0 0 U } " z Z Z Z Z 0_C. O) cu Q Q < < < Q. O Q O C.9 N N N N N CO CU ID Ca CU O • a CD 4- C2., O O ctt N CA N E -c, . •_ o Q cu N O E E O 0OCU O CD O 0 C.) i Q N N N 0.) CNI0 � O °J M Z .� N E o cc C r W N LJJ r °' c • O Q CU XI 0 o_ W "MIN, el, bI �P �O• "17 �Imo- ]6� -o 43) 7:� e.: , �.;t c, lf N N N - 4.li0 .3%P\ I� C ' ' E ��i' "4" N O = co O 0 +-' b.O N 0- - ' 4-0 O < NN cn O O L >- co L v = co C 1 co M I C) O LA L LL N O I > q' L C CO C a) en = eni 4.' V N C N _0 O 0 O a 0 r 0 N --, N u t/} co) a) *-§ ,_ M a1 N ,--I aJ N N 0 N N _p Z Ni NI }' -o N \ a II O O � � � � z O = I E "a aJ 0 _0 L O N N O LoNI L.) O O c\I c...4 0 ( v Z ) U CJ U O +� a) _0 -0 aJ = _0 .0 0 -0 Li) CL Cin- 7 -0 = Q m O ° C u ' - • L v .N � bD co � oa, cvu' .EL U •L c � - as U I 0 I 0 < cc V♦ 0 ^V, 0 W u) • — 0 E ° E mu) v •- U LU 0 U U (I) oo_ o #1 e 1,A v/4/ 14* P . am :•••••••••••••1 If( 6? 1111k, 1 ,.• ; , , r � •• y i •• dill I , �A +)) ..e. •• • - I \` i I ,I+ ' l 't rn • y • d ^` �--r • p I ) I .� i Switzer, Donna From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 3:30 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: still pro high-density housing From: Patti<paclasen222@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 26, 2022 4:34 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: still pro high-density housing I wrote October 17th about being pro affordable housing. I got another missive on my doorstep in The Peninsula this afternoon from HB United for Responsible Zoning. Part of it was a full page letter. I misunderstood the area they were fighting against. The area they are talking about is the old eccentric American Landscape Supply land. Just to let you know, I am pro multi-story housing there. I think it would be a wonderful place for families close to Central Park and grocery stores. Patti Clasen SUPPLEMEN1"AL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: // /2Z Agenda Item No.; y (2-.2 gD(oe Switzer, Donna From: Hopkins, Travis Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 1:01 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: High Density Building Concerns HB From:Jenny Buettner<shibuecouture@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, October 27, 2022 11:33 AM Subject: High Density Building Concerns HB To whom it may concern, As a concerned resident for 55 years we are NOT in approval of the upcoming High Density Building being presented on November 1 & 15th. I understand there is a vote coming up on the new proposed High Density Building near our Seagate community and we are among many of the concerned residents. The impact of this proposed development will have an enormous traffic, litter, and real estate price impact on our city. Currently, HB has too many HIGH Density areas that have caused many issues in our community (not to mention homelessness) and allowing for more HIGH density will turn us into an LA type of town.... our quaint, peaceful HB is turning into a hot mess with all the new developments being granted by the previous city councils. Please VOTE NO on this and any future High Density Buildings. Thank you! -- SUPPLEMENTAL Jenny Buettner COMMUNICATION Shibue Couture Office: 877-270-3313 Meeting Date: I/// 122 Agenda Item No.: q(•Zz—w(Oa) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail transmission,and any documents,files or previous e-mail messages attached to it,may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that you must not read or play this transmission and that any disclosure,copying,printing,distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error,please immediately notify the sender by telephone or retum e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner 1 Switzer, Donna From: Esparza, Patty Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 2:52 PM To: Switzer, Donna Subject: Fwd: High Density Housing in Seacliff Supplemental communications Please include this in today's supplemental communication-thx! Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Carr, Kim" <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org> Date: October 28, 2022 at 10:18:40 AM PDT To: "Esparza, Patty" <PEsparza@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Fwd: High Density Housing in Seacliff Please include this as part of the public record. Thank you. Kim Carr, Council Member City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 C: (714)625-6894 E: kim.carr(cr�surfcity-hb.orq Begin forwarded message: From: Niki Wetzel <nikicuttc7i yahoo.com> Subject: Fwd: High Density Housing in Seacliff Date: October 28, 2022 at 9:42:43 AM PDT To: Kim Carr <kim.carr@surfcity-hb.orq> SUPPLEMEM AL Sent from my iPhone COMMUNICATION Begin forwarded message: Meeting Date: Agenda Item No.: / (2.2-go o) From: Date: October 28, 2022 at 9:19:00 AM PDT To: Niki Wetzel <nikicut@yahoo.com>, DKubas@elitehoa.com Subject: Fwd: High Density Housing in Seacliff Hi Niki and Damon, Here is a letter sent to SeaCliff Elementary parents. There are some good nuggets in here to consider incorporating into our letter. Please let me know how I can help with our progress to produce our HOA letter. I'm available until 4pm today! Forwarded message From: Cassie Braun <cassie.bieggar@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 9:12 AM Subject: Fwd: High Density Housing in Seacliff To: Carrie Lines <carriealines@gmail.com> Forwarded message From: Cynthia Barrios<cindy.barrios@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:02 PM Subject: High Density Housing in Seacliff To: As a Seacliff Elementary parent, you may have heard the recent news about high density development(HDD) coming to the Seacliff area adjacent to the school. Please take a moment to read this and share with your friends and neighbors. We really need EVERYONE to show up to the City Council meetings on Nov 1 and Nov 15 at 6 PM so that they can measure public opinion and hear directly from us! 2 PLEASE LEARN ABOUT IOINSEACLMV it APINIIIIMMww11w1AMi1 MN NAM •....•••• ` :'`: • Mr....MMN..r r..iW.Au... ••...yr • r r.M...r.w.Mmamaf..E Mr m..r gr.- SHOW UP AND SPEAK UP!! POW I AAS9 NOV 11TH AT AIY M1111114TOM MAC H crtr 11PR1 It(tU II% 3 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:13 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Agenda item no. 22-906 Housing Element (11/1/22 city county meeting) Attachments: Aguilar letter to HB council 20221028.pdf From:Jennifer Aguilar<mrsjenaguilar@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:12 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda item no. 22-906 Housing Element(11/1/22 city county meeting) Please see attached. Thank you! Jennifer Aguilar 714-803-8540 Sent from my iPhone • SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 14 1 I a,y-a Agenda Item No.; a #`7 (Pa- /ao October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1,2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory y. 'tg , .. "J r* e s k`v rim', " �+v '"R Wi.40 .1t # rr- `4,000'' t fix.,�+s'°" r ` 4.� r< Leg.nd a i C!a,,,/x "" 4+ '- 11 City Boundary t Ge.FJ 4 •e c 2 49 R - e 1r..'t Sites Inventory 1 339 - x ; ` " * ' t111± 121122 r• r ` ` i 127 4` 1v 182 =. f , . .= 1 .. . p. "137 '''-'.�... .rr- _ _-.. -- 76 r:ail 161 ` 4f t: "f:ttit a. • I ,f t' .-'' 125 •"- liptiir3 4z'. 286 pp ' - ' M 87-N;:i } %ti a * - I.r r. � ie+ 3 w�'- . . . r + 3B8 iRi 88 • . We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394)a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: J 4 r\ ( I' lel '`- Street Name Only/Email: ' \' h P7, Cr) VC'31 2' wlat I . C erwl Signature/Initials: ( � Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:13 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Agenda Item no.22 906 Housing Element From: PETER MACIVER<loripeter_24@msn.com> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 12:29 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>n Subject: Agenda Item no.22-906 Housing Element cco r r. a .ee ' cdiiit452= 5 € ; de.l - s as 1a v K ii...1, i' rroc 9. 0. -7 1 ci 1,cm ztm, _ m g 4 r = E� a sceS.° cu Q 1Ch 4 e i n �. Ccn ;rn C.' # .C' . r a � .0 L ` aG V. „"' _ � C� 4.4 i. .td9 = i s. ¢te.CE a r +,^� W s yak•a 6.5 •v =cL �: ` i v ? . . e . t a .} M i - ati g Ew▪ 'm4 L1y @iL" - o C yV < w u .` e3c�fe ATo utiV a ci a ar 0. t 1.7 '4' l'!". i-4::, / }�gp� _ ▪ c a o m c 7 C C>`�S rrj Y1 ry y, N .., $ Illc L ! k1 .G rw' . '. '< vlF .,.,.....i u t» is .dam, s,• 'c $ a: E G•v u E sn :2 SUPPLEMENTAL COM Pal UNICAT ON meeting Data: 1 Agenda ►.. Sp y ( -9ZXn c... .....1 ..,.. , „:4 r.: -.• ;a :,• 1 t.."1 Z c0 C. GZ .7•••• X X E CO 4 .,.. ---- 3L0 i 0 giE' _ ., s „,,,- —,,,. c .= . 4, ,„ ,.. 1- ,c ., 3.= 4 == I 4. .re .. .,..0.' .C.. ,,, t 1 .0 . ..ki. .11 t .,.4.1 ..?." -...) —!I E -I.. 7,1" c• la P., .,-, ct —..c.0 c = E E g 7±ft F. A ul r4 4 11 z vi a .. . ,,,,, .. .e. ...„. . ,s. ..._ . ,1 1 I.Nc "' 5, u% ‘ = .. SI.0 fg F..- 74 r..;v.,•C— >—, 74. 6- ii d E w t ni w ri.-c c -.• 0 = c , 1.., — — . c -7,1 .s'2:f., te E E., 7, 0 7.,1 1.'; CD .9 C ,,,,,iol.9 •C J 0 ..„, tv R. tic Le E ., 4,c g 'Z 4 c .....c c .. =.- 21: tEc. cloc, 4.7 .,.., ,z y...... e. 0 ea e4 no- _ la E wr .,n z Z.' vs. III Sent from my iPhone 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:15 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element.pdf From:Thong Dinh <tdinh1254@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 10:54 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Sent from Mail for Windows SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION iUNICATION ?Mang Date: I g00.2- Aciarxia ram,too.; S.5° q (a9 c p) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 8-10:Site Inventory i fb :; . f.Alfa";T`1'� •t :' 3 .r.; t r / Y wolf':'� mili1III 39,3 s i'k ., , eg 5, , MI11111111 395 1392 a `40 .: `, p 1 - r.,a 1111111 398 396 240 a '4 , ° - Legend 1:15E294 ? •• soai`. III1IlII rv ' l City Boundary I `m° 97 ;246 ® 249, . �L ��." 250 302 . 111 ' 0 Sites Inventory 4„—s A0I ,' 121 a - 248 247 122 ' c :i�12.7 I 1B2 137 1Witfie 61 y°y1�131�` «w.x k ar a Y FJ�j v t-,--2 8 6 - ", .1,. . ," ; t. -" f-- 254 ,�+;+.r , r �►:Z, t' .,- S85' 387 L" -�e�1 N "� 386 ► •rel—i 14 w 388•- r .w y- ice-'-. .3119_ .0, We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Thong Dinh Name: Stratton Lane/tdinh1254@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: Thong Dinh/TD Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:17 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Proposed High Density Developments Near Seagate From: Ingrid Lee<ingridlee222@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 2:12 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed High Density Developments Near Seagate Dear Council Members Delgleize, Posey, Carr, Peterson, Kalmick, Moser and Bolton, My name is Ingrid Lee, and I live in the Seagate Community of Huntington Beach. This is regarding the proposed plan to put 70 units/acre behind the Sherwood area. I am concerned the crowding will increase conflict in our neighborhood - increased traffic, crime and pollution. I thought Huntington Beach was a Charter City. I don't quite understand. However, if we do have to build 13,000 units of affordable housing( again, I don't believe these units will be cheap), can they be redistributed so that there can be townhomes behind Sherwood as opposed to high rise apartments? Thank you for your consideration, Ingrid Lee SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeing Date: it1ilg-dga— Agenda Item No4 S' '4 ( Vo) Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:17 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Agenda item number 22-906 Attachments: Agenda item NO. 22-906 housing element November 1 2022 city council meeting.pdf From: Patrick D<patrickdibernardo@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 8:24 AM To: patrickdibernardo@gmail.com Subject:Agenda item number 22-906 Council members, Please consider the attached letter regarding the HSSP development. What is being proposed is simply out of control. Thank you for your consideration, Patrick Di Bernardo SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: III , 00aa- a nay,No4 SS-41i (9a-q0(0 1 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 4 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory -1 e„,k- 'PL.* tr.,• I ',4,140, - - - , .4.. 1 _ .,elpitinti oky i.eg.rtoi.,,zr if moi ,iir.„.. 4 4,, ^ ilk fre..77, z Legend 4110'i C am► ® ' 249$ M" II City Boundary t emit;i edgu ji!41:`#. , BB Sites Inventory tt` — ` 4:4)4ki A*.S11 !EI,.m'2 122 Iir. '►i� ti: 127 48 fi lir 18 ,,. in.r ty►Y�e.reni. 1 e93 air, - ' -137 ; "',,,� 126 231 161 --rr�d NNW vommut ,' 110 131 125 160 -' ... 384 ,^-286 -4 7 ``'!..( t wu. ' 251. .t4p„,m,,p"4,-o,.,„l.t„„2 44:1 0'Siek 1.04i.•. ± .. . '385 `.4r;:...-- 387 ,$ . A .. \,0 1 388 aw t .wt 390 89 1 a We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach atrick Di Bernardo Name: alera Ln/patrickdibernardo@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: ,_ , 4° Dit* lk f.P. _ Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:18 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Seagate Housing Element concern Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: Effie Kee<treyeffie@yahoo.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 7:37 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Seagate Housing Element concern SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION meeting Ages item No411-1 (Pa qCc.>? October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory •.. • x :"5'1 4♦" :3k' ^h' -... by "1r " -/ '7, • 8 r:, ":bill°. 4. ; r'.-- ''''. 1-,,, 0' "444 11111111111 395 394 r - 4 - ' � fillllllllll ;w . ►% '. QDIIII 398 395 ��240 v ...� „ w.r Legend I11111i ® _ --_ ... : '). 11 City Boundary 1 .- ,3, 397 .246 ® 249 j 0 Sites Inventory u t .„ 2`0 302 111 121 , 4r: i. .12•74.= ?1, 7 I 18 4'.*A..-�Aim 129:m, :,: L. - 137 b«,, 83-12r� ` 231 161 ' :110, '1 16 0 - 131`- : fir'<.9 , <. , 384 1 't.�—254 _..... t. 385—�'' 387 im it", R1 386 ^ -6t r "\ 389 - ' -.4` 350 ;= ^. t 7, ,°..6t. 4 - fir^ We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:19 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element.pdf From:Agnes&Ted<oerr@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 10:29 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP As a long time resident of HB since 1977, I am against having high density housing which would add to the congestion and noise on Goldenwest and Gothard streets that have started to already be a problem as it has awoken me several times in the early hours of the morning. The beautiful community of Seagate and surrounding areas would be severely impacted. Agnes Do SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Cate: 11 ! ► l 00a 9- Agenda horn No.9 61 (9,9- 9()L0 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory VOW t., z prow.`' . r 'rye a '`"\ 8 0 a : :, , -.„ i Tf--1 ..,„:"Itite ,_,..,,,t ,......,,F,tv ',..„,,4 4„ 111111111111 39s 394 414 '" �� (illlllllllil12.6240:r 'r - `y4.,y Illll[III ass . IIIIIII■ 396 —_r ; 4; legend ,,'" ill1llll 397 ,246 245 440-140 9 City Boundary i , . --, . A �- CI Sites Invento �' 250 302 '71111 -' ry �‘,ss:v248 247 121122 .1 se' :- : t 11•1�127 v ' 182 S-<'e 129.' : �_ 137 ' a-:.-*.,-sa ii;,.,i- 20 231 s _125160 J ... 131 - 4^286 II " es.254 :ti` r rn ..s "385—" "=387 pt �( 386 -- 4i�a '391 \ ,389, We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:19 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Regarding high density housing in HB Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element kong.pdf From: Eunice Kong<ekong712@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 8:20 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Regarding high density housing in HB Please see attached letter regarding our concern for the proposed high density housing plan in the Huntington Beach Seacliff area. Thank you, -Eunice and Brian Kong SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meets Date: I I I QQ�r�- October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory ,. %' p gyp._ of ' n.;, ry ❑ '' " to i* ,„41 4 ::7*i:393 '` , r ; nailliiliilll 395 394 0 t- `+ .. � `F, liillllllllli : �,. '` o c� .. mini 398 396 240. .. - �, cat r Legend 4*4 III1IIII14 397 «® *-71***1 = II city Boundary 1 �i. 9 i"--. k,; ,- 246 245 ' 249 O Sites Inventory Li 140 ,* 250 302 1 121 11 122 *Wirt 127 4`. 7j 247 ' i . _18 2 .: '12837 :. �v� ., 83, `.` Ai•.. '`lbl137 * . ,110 131` � 125 `- 38s 1+ J '14—�'/38 i/1 f7 - x ¢ \ ,� gilq. 388 � 389- fV 8 0'*t....... i 11Z4*-''' jii +..ram - S.. _ ,:: • _ "."--F !, t `•. .' ter We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Brian and Eunice Kong Street Name Only/Email: Siena Dr, Huntington Beach, ca, 92648 Ekong712@gmail.com Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:21 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: High Density Housing Element Attachments: SCAN0198.PDF From: Cassie Braun<cassie.bieggar@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 5:48 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: High Density Housing Element As a Sea Gate resident and having two kids in Sea Cliff elementary I strongly disapprove of this high density proposal. Please see my attached letter that goes into further detail on my opposition. The community knows all about the 4th of July parade, the marathon, the Air Show and yet you have not talked at all to any of us of this drastic proposal that is going to take place and fundamentally change our community. Thank you, Cassie Braun SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 1I ► �a�aa Agenda Item No.; gS*y ( qc(o 1 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO.22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing on the following lots with a 70 du/ac density: Lots 83, 110, 111, 121, 122, 126, 127, 129, 182,231, 238, 239,240, 244,245, 246, 247, 248, 249,250, 393,&394. City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory 9!?!Elht 144 vt ‘zi +R � ,, fi r?: Vr-tr* _ t� Legend 1111111,Iri^°1 II City Boundary I l �` :249 o Sites Inventory +- 1 )"� a. " 1 111121 ,` ' :..t.:4:14:,i, 248` ice-ykf 12 . �� 825 160-, t4itiv. 4254 87 'a 4,..SC131";*-',i„i'tist " , �-,.,. 3 e8 ' , za ks*teN' ""litt4,41 % , . ,,-.., 391:4,2" , : We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac)anywhere in)the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Cassie Braun Street Name Only/Email: Ashford Lane Signature: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:21 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Huntington Beach Housing Element Attachments: Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: Matt Braun<matt.braun4@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 5:32 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Huntington Beach Housing Element Members of the City Council, In advance of the Nov. 1 meeting on this topic, I'd like to make you aware of my views as a local resident of the Holly-Seacliff area. Thank you, Matt Braun SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meets Date: II t► 190 ea- otgenda Imo (9 ' Uo') October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing on the following lots with a 70 du/ac density: Lots 83, 110, 111, 121, 122, 126, 127, 129, 182, 231, 238, 239, 240, 244, 245,246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 393, &394. City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory 't : " � 393 , ` Ella Ell inn 395 • ?394 .� 1 Legend 239 244 *'t*` 11 City Boundary IIEI 397 246. 245 249 ; 250 302 111 -� o Sites Inventory • 339,"-448` 8 �; 247 238 127122 "tif,f t.:4127 182 231 161 � -. 110 131 125 160 *i + , 384 286 " 254 $q 385_i. 387AO ,y.x 386 ram ► `391 389 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in)the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Matt Braun Street Name Only/Email: Ashford Lane Signature: 7ria -S a Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:24 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Please read before Nov 1st; request to modify impact to SeaGate communities from residential rezoning Attachments: HSSP development concerns.pdf From: Davida Milo<davidajoan@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 9:27 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Davida Joan Milo- me<davidajoan@yahoo.com>;Villasenor,Jennifer<JVillasenor@surfcity-hb.org>; Zelinka,Al <AI.Zelinka@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Please read before Nov 1st; request to modify impact to SeaGate communities from residential rezoning Hello City Council Members, I am a 25 year HB resident and have urgent concerns about the 70 du/ac residential rezoning proposed less than 100 feet from the end of my street. May I request that you please read the attached letter containing my concerns/proposed alternatives before the next council meeting which will address this issue. I understand it is on the agenda November 1st. Thank you for your time and consideration, Davida Milo -Davida Milo davidajoan@yahoo.corn SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mew Date: 1111 9,0a A r item No.; S4t4 (9� •6101.0\)) October 28,2022 SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES TO: Our Huntington Beach Mayor and City Council Members: My name is Davida Milo, and I have lived in Huntington Beach for 25 years. Our current home of 18 years inside the Sherwood community is located in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP). The plan made available to buyers when we purchased in 2004 calls for the development of a variety of uses but provides for residential uses at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac). My home is in a portion of the HSSP that is developed at a density of 7 du/ac. The plan acknowledges existing industrial area between Gothard Street to the east, Garfield Avenue to the south, Goldenwest Street to the west,and Ernest Drive to the north. The first draft map of Housing Element candidate sites,released in the fall of 2021, showed a Housing Overlay at 35 dwelling units per acre across the full stretch of industrial area south of my home as shown below: ...,.,,.,1 ,,,7' �u s, I Draft Housing Overlay Fall 2021-35 du/ac maximum: ' t However,we very recently learned that map was revised to show double the dwelling density in roughly half of the same area- 70 du/ac, which is a shocking proposal. • l.: a Current Draft Housing Overlay- 70 du/ac maximum: ' The current proposal would completely and irreparably alter the character of our community that was committed to home buyers in the HSSP,and it should not be approved. That density is totally out of context for Holly-Seacliff and is not in line with parameters provided in the plan for our low-density area when we bought this house. We live on Ambrose Lane,a short street that ends against Ernest Drive. Ernest is fewer than 10 homes away from us.A residential development of this density, in that small space,has clear potential and likelihood to be a much higher rise building than our low-density area. It would dramatically erode privacy for our and our neighbors' properties to have a building of significant height(required to accommodate the du/ac currently suggested)towering over our neighborhood. I definitely understand the nonnegotiable CA state mandate to zone for additional housing development in HB and that it requires zoning for a minimum defined number of dwelling units. I feel strongly that refusing to plan is tantamount to sticking our heads in the sand. It subjects our city to dangerous financial and legal risk. I think efforts and HB budget dollars spent to attempt to refuse to cooperate(e.g. suing our state) is a waste of HB city 1 employee time and our HB dollars. Instead, I hope that HB efforts and budget can be more productively directed at developing best case solutions to comply and evolve our city effectively within these requirements. No city stays the same forever. I realize that complying with this large housing zoning mandate is challenging. In my view,the best case is to propose plans to meet the mandate that provide the best possible outcome for as much of the HB resident population as possible. I'd welcome a well architected multi-family housing development(similar to existing Cape Ann community) adjacent to our community in place of the current industrial lots. I also hope each development will be subject to HB's architectural review. I strongly suggest that • The du/ac ratio should be restricted to 30 du/ac maximum for development in Holly-Seacliff for any residential zoning,with a maximum of 3 stories for buildings. • Adequate parking should be mandated for developers in Holly-Seacliff to accommodate future residents in line with HB municipal parking code for residential communities. • Parking regulation must continue to prohibit overnight parking on Ernest. • Rezoning along Ernest between Goldenwest to Garfield should stipulate a prohibition on balconies and roof decks since these structures would be a significant invasion of privacy into nearby homes and would introduce excess noise into adjacent low-density housing. • Rezoning for residential use in Holly-Seacliff should include industrial areas in the first and current draft Housing Overlay to better accommodate the state housing allocation quantity with lower density in each area.ALL land south from Ernest down to Gothard that is bordered between Goldenwest and Gothard (on east and west respectively) should be included in this residential rezoning with this 30 du/ac limit applied. • Rezoning should comply with state mandate in a way that will distribute rezoning across the total HB geography to share this burden and not subject any one HB area to disproportionate strain. In addition, I propose • Rezoning for residential use in HB at higher densities above 30 du/ac should be reserved for areas adjacent to major HB corridors that already accommodate structures with heights of 4 stories or more. Building new higher-rise residential buildings would be more consistent with the character of areas along major HB corridors that already have higher rise buildings. • Affordable housing quotas that are required of HB should be incorporated as modest percentages within each new construction and zoning plans. Low-income housing should not be singled out into separate buildings. A blend would allow reasonable access for lower income residents to live in quality communities while encouraging shared priorities amongst all residents to support a safe and well maintained community. • Incentives should be considered to entice the developer to incorporate a small playground or green space within their development to maintain HB's reputation as a city with superior ratios of park space per capita. This helps to maintain our property value and HB's desirability for families. I sincerely appreciate your time and attention to my concerns. Please contact me if you have additional requests for my input at davidajoan@yahoo.com. Thank you, Davida Milo 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:24 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: High Density Building Concerns HB From:Jenny Buettner<shibuecouture@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, October 27, 2022 11:33 AM Subject: High Density Building Concerns HB To whom it may concern, As a concerned resident for 55 years we are NOT in approval of the upcoming High Density Building being presented on November 1 & 15th. I understand there is a vote coming up on the new proposed High Density Building near our Seagate community and we are among many of the concerned residents. The impact of this proposed development will have an enormous traffic, litter, and real estate price impact on our city. Currently, HB has too many HIGH Density areas that have caused many issues in our community (not to mention homelessness) and allowing for more HIGH density will turn us into an LA type of town.... our quaint, peaceful HB is turning into a hot mess with all the new developments being granted by the previous city councils. Please VOTE NO on this and any future High Density Buildings. Thank you! Jenny Buettner SUPPLEMENTAL Shibue Couture COMMUNICATION Office: 877-270-3313 Meeting Date: 1111 Laoa� Agenda Item itio.;, SSIN (9 -63W CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail transmission,and any documents,files or previous e-mail messages attached to it,may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that you must not read or play this transmission and that any disclosure,copying,printing,distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error,please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 1:20 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Housing Dendity From: Danny Nguyen <dan.mnguyen911@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2022 6:15 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Housing Dendity Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As a long time residents of Huntington Beach, we urged you and the council members to reconsider the housing project (better yet to stop the project). The city of HB has been known as one of the best place to live in California. The housing project is not only changing the look and the value of city of HB, the quality of life but it also affects various important factors such as crime rate increase, parking and traffic congestion, environmental effect like more noise & air pollution and over populate (we do not want the city to become the worst place to live in CA). PLEASE STOP THE HOUSING PROJECT. Best Regards, Danny Nguyen. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meang Date: I I ► g089- Agenda Ism No.; S#/ (dd. • Q O ) Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:26 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Bel Air HOA -- Board letter Attachments: 2210 BAHA Board Letrter to City Council re Housing Element[1][1].pdf From:Yasmin Daniels<yaz@bluepacificproperty.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 10:09 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Bel Air HOA-- Board letter Good Morning, Please see attached on behalf of the Bel Air HOA. Should you have any questions, comments, or require additional information, please feel free to contact me.Thank you and have a wonderful rest of the day. Yasmin Daniels, CCAM Community Manager Office: (714)641-0593 Direct Line: (714)783-4288 Email: yaz@bluepacificproperty.cQr www.BluePacificProperty.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE.This e-mail transmission,and any documents,files or previous e-mail messages attached to it,may contain confidential and proprietary information.If you are not the intended recipient,or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any disclosure,copying,distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.If you have received this transmission in error,please immediately notify me by reply e-mail at In_fo_gBIuePacificProperty.com or by telephone at 714.641.0593,and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them in any manner. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 111� Agenda Item Pio.; SR #L{ (919' 9C6 1 DocuSign Envelope ID:B0E72893-05ED-4C7A-82EE-38480C30AE72 October 28, 2022 SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: We are the Bel Air Homeowners Association Board Members and represent the 102 homeowners in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP). Many of our members are original homeowners that have lived in Huntington Beach for over 20 years. As part of the Seagate Community Association,we held a Town Hall meeting with nearly 75 homeowners on Sunday, October 23`d to address the proposed Housing Element.All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community. Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the plan calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 &394)a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. Because of the low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area,we are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. 70 du/ac is ten times the density of our neighborhood and would irreparably change the character of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, projects would be even higher and more dense. This type of urban development has no context in the low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Bel Air homeowners knowingly bought into when purchasing their homes. Of specific concern, we are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences. Also concerning is that areas in the northwest& southeast of the City are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density. We are aware of the mandates the State has put on cities to meet their regional housing needs and support a reasonable certified Housing Element for the City of Huntington Beach and understand the consequences of not having one. We would fully support a Housing Overlay at a reasonable density not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft, but on all the industrial area between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with councilmembers and the community which reduce densities in the subject industrial area. The Bel Air Board of Directors would be in favor of any housing development the includes the following. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. DocuSign Envelope ID:B0E72893-05ED-4C7A-82EE-38480C30AE72 We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November lst to discuss the proposed Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make it more consistent with homes in the surrounding areas. Thank you for your consideration,and please feel free to contact us. Bel Air Homeowners Association Board of Directors JAVA"."'.President —DocuSLgnne�d by: '"`�f�N atgl t -Vice—President `-1068EE606D09449... DocuSigned by: IL tc Ilutp -Treasurer 0889BE381 EAD451... CDocuSigned by: YIS 6(6 - Secretary 415B639C067247A... "--DocuSigned by: - Director �75AFD0080539478... Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:25 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM No. 2-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Seacliff Plan.pdf From: paul@americanvaloans.com <paul@americanvaloans.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:18 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:jessica.bunney@gmail.com Subject:AGENDA ITEM No. 2-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear City Council, Other than voting I am not one to get too involved in city politics but this issue has made me reach out because of the proposal I am seeing. Please see the attached letter which reflects mine and my family's thoughts on this proposal in the city and we urge you to not allow such high density in our small part of town. It doesn't fit in with the neighborhood dynamics and we will be at the meetings fighting this, and also fighting it with our votes in future elections. Sincerely, Paul Collier I Sr. VA Mortgage Consultant Cell: (714) 904-4617 Fax: (866) 342-6276 Email: paul a@americanvaloans.com kwio, AM E�RI CAN VAApply Now! NMLS#927511 American NMLS#1802461 www.nm Isconsumeraccess.orq This communication,together with any attachments here to or links contained here in is property of American VA Loans,for the sole use of the intended recipient's and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any review,disclosure, copying,printing,dissemination,distribution or use of this communication is strictly prohibited.If you have received this communication in error,please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication,along with any attachments hereto or links here in,from your system. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: I i I aa-_ - -- Agenda Itk m No.• W October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 8-10:Site Inventory i At' , tiii-11-4«, 4.-°:' '''' 41::......_,. ... : tliiii ;.7,*.::/' , air„1. .mi • .. t,, :.1. .4. 4 -, „,..,,,,f :I..;,..of,• 0 0., lc:lb . r EMIR 393 .. ' ''"ill�l101�� 3�35 394. ► «� "11lIIII 398 4 t � "�'"�' .- ailp I 396 23n --j Legendr. IIi�iIIL 397 244 II City Boundary F k , ; ' 225Q 348 ® t 249 1 Sites Inventory �1;ee �238 121122 *vie '. t 248.. t 13182 -- .' '9 - 129. '-' _�, . .. ..4 .4., 83:126 . ' 231- 161 n k ,+ 110 131•'- 125 a---2 8 6 411 • . 4385'—i° 387 c r " x' : , �-.-`�388 • '" 39) 39Q .ter We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Paul Collier Name: Sinclair Ln. paul@americanvaloans.com Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: G� Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:26 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) From: Melissa Johnson <mellyjohnson11@outlook.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 9:52 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP)with a 7o du/ac density: Ctye'Ik ntnpton Beech 2021.2029 Hamm Element DRAFT Figure B.10:Site Inventory ��'sP w a _q {{ ' yrr 1, pN . N. Q y„ , , i ;w '.it • .1 i' .0 * 353. +.. ,' _ 39E� 7-2-77-',.. , . , f 'AMID . `Lagand t `'7: atb [y.. • ..9 aII City Boundary " ((j T11 t= Sites tnvontory ` '2,,S.J+-f,;.:) 'tit, s8 ,7' 36 121122 2 162. M `ar >k2� 31 16G —., 384.131 _--.era .— *114talcir3ti5b '•I"' � 3B7 x We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 7o du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP)calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac)anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393&394)a maximum density of no more than 7 SUPPLEMENTAL du/ac.The current"Housing Element"shows a 7o du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in heighCO i MUNICATION (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be I entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. It ing Date: G 14 0.092,- i J1 Aged item Ain.., #Zt (ad- - CC&) The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach.Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 7o du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3.No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within ioo feet of Ernest Drive. 6.Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Melissa and Jesse Johnson 7681 Park Forest Drive, Huntington Beach,CA 92648 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:27 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) From:jiayluo@gmail.com <jiayluo@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 9:06 AM Cc: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Re: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stair wells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings in the HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meer rat,: 11 Agenda Urn No.; 354.4 629- 91Y0) We urge the City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Jia Luo Seagate community resident 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:28 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: SIGNED YOON - AMBROSE LN - AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 HOUSING ELEMENT Attachments: YOON-AMBROSE LN -AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 HOUSING ELEMENT_10-31-2022.pdf From:Your Grace<gkilyoon@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 9:05 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:SIGNED YOON -AMBROSE LN -AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 HOUSING ELEMENT Dear Huntington Beach City Council: Please see attached signed homeowners of AMBROSE LANE, Stewart and Grace Yoon of SEAGATE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, HB signed 6 measures in the above "Housing Element". Thank you and regards, Grace and Stewart Yoon SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: l 191 Pp? 1 Agencia Item No.; S 1 Pr2- -90/102 October 28,2022 TO:Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1,2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT 1 Figure B-10:Site Inventory yr, ►11414t' PO" r ` If ,=:, , ` ' . • ,, .� .► l t .t i -, <" "' . . y ma ,' " i . •zi if 'ig .. 4-" - -. x . 0.' •395' 414.4� +, -. w,,.,.. . t. IA 1398r 1 07; 12 .► f • I Iif . �, — ,. •. Lagend ill City Boundary ) ai i #, , .4 . r .s - C417;.‘ t � ' �, �, ,<1 o +sites Inventory - D f t r.i ` 12�� ' "' r. 74, 115poi --- 5�160 - #4,.. #286 I z 6 Z 1 .�i . iihiti � `,• f ism1--- 386 r of* .A f, '.°'' ,,,,L_+ /IJ i ti a .*, oil � -i We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Stewart Yoon and Grace Yoon Name: Ambrose Lane/ gkilyoon@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: .44 _,1 ) Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:30 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element Nov. 1, 2022 City Council Meeting Attachments: Letter HB CCouncil- Seagate Housing Element 103122.docx From:James DelloRusso<jdell34@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 8:00 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element Nov. 1, 2022 City Council Meeting Please forward the attached letter to all City Council Members today. Thanks. James DelloRusso SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: t�. s JD93- 1 Agenda Item No.;, SSItg (2r9 -gap) October 31, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (Nov. 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are AFFRONTED BY and OPPOSE any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density. We OPPOSE these proposals as they stand because: 1. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. 2. The proposed"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community. 3. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? As homeowners, if any"Housing Element" proposals come to pass,we insist on the following 6 measures: 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (NE corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (NE corner of Goldenwest&Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac anywhere in the HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings anywhere in the HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. These are calculations under which- IN GOOD FAITH- homeowners here have purchased their properties. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Homeowner of Seagate Community Association Name: James DelloRusso Street Name Only/Email: Garnet Lane jde1134@gmail.com ' CtiuAj)ta(0±1/1A-A440 Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:32 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) From: H Muliadi<hmuliadi@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:58 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stair wells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings in the HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge the City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the II.,ous4.E .cpra hieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. COMMUMCATION Sincerely, k e ag Date: !I If 190 9-a- i :spenda item Ito4 z/ (99 - /(.la Harun Muliadi Ainsley Drive 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:32 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Oppose High Density Housing near Seacliff Elementary (ZTA 22-006, ZTA 22-007) From:Jesse Biebesheimer<jbiebes@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 12:13 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Oppose High Density Housing near Seacliff Elementary(ZTA 22-006,ZTA 22-007) Dear Members of the City Council, As a long time resident of Huntington Beach, past graduate of Huntington Beach High School, and parent of two children at Huntington Seacliff Elementary School, I am writing to express concern about zoning changes that will have a profound impact on our neighborhood, schools, community, and quality of life. Like many of my neighbors, I was surprised to learn about proposals for multiple high density housing developments in the Huntington Seacliff area. I am deeply concerned that this will increase congestion and traffic in the area. As a parent, I am worried about a massive influx of students to Huntington Seacliff Elementary School, Dwyer Middle School, and Huntington Beach High School. This will have a profound impact on classroom sizes and the quality of education for my children for years to come. These schools, already at capacity, cannot be expected to absorb hundreds of new students. No formal studies have been conducted to determine the impact on our schools. I am also concerned about construction traffic and noise immediately adjacent to Seacliff Elementary and the safety problems this will create. The proposed developments simply do not fit with the character of our neighborhood, contradict decades of careful city planning, and will overwhelm our local schools. I strongly urge the Council to vote against the High Density Housing Overlays to the Ellis Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff Specific Plans. Sincerely, Jesse Biebesheimer SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: I I I I g a" Agenda Item Wm, Ss `� ( 9p) Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Item No. 22-906—2021-2029 Housing Element Candidate Sites (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: 2022-10-30 - Crystalaire CA, Inc. - Board Letrter to the HB City Council re Housing Element.pdf From:AL<alitovsky@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:05 PM To: Delgleize, Barbara<Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik<Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan <Dan.Kalmick@surfcity- hb.org>; Moser, Natalie<Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Mike Kubas<mike@elitehoa.com>; Louisa <vigor98@socal.rr.com>;Vivian Ng<vivianbng@aol.com>; Anna Straub <anna.straubl@icloud.com>; Keith Angel<keith.angel@avisionteam.com> Subject: Item No. 22-906—2021-2029 Housing Element Candidate Sites (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED LETTER SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: III 1 gcC4 9- Agenda Item No.; — ( -9c ) CRYSTALAIRE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. 18720 Crystalaire Lane Huntington Beach, California 92648 October 30,2022 Via E-Mail Only: Barbara.delgleize@surfcitv-hb.org; Mike.posev surfcity-hb.org; kim.carr@surfcity- hb.ore;erik.petersoniWsurfcity-hb.org;dan.kalmicktWsurfcity-hb.org; natalie.moser@surfcity-hb.org; Rhonda.boltontWsurfcity-hb.org; citv.council@surfcity-hb.org;cfikesPsurfcity-hb.org Mayor of City of Huntington Beach Member of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Item No. 22-906—2021-2029 Housing Element Candidate Sites (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: This letter is on behalf of Crystalaire Community Association, Inc. ("Crystalaire"),which represents over three hundred residents of Huntington Beach and comprises homeowners of ninety- eight single-family residences in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan("HSSP"). Many of our members are original homeowners that have owned their properties within Crystalaire in Huntington Beach for over twenty years. As part of the Seagate Community Association, we participated in a Town Hall meeting with nearly seventy-five homeowners on Sunday, October 23rd to discuss the proposed Housing Element. All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community. Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the city plan called for and allowed the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than twenty-five(25)dwelling units/acre(du/ac)anywhere in the plan and, for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest(lots 393 &394),a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. Because of the well-established low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area, we are alarmed that such high density projects would be considered in this area. Seventy(70) du/ac is 10 times the density of our neighborhood and,if allowed,it would irreparably and negatively change the character of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At the proposed density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, projects would be even higher and Mayor of Huntington Beach City Council Members,City of Huntington Beach October 29,2022 Page 2 of 2 more dense.These are not the densities our members reasonably expected to see when they invested in their homes within the HSSP. The proposed high-density urban development has no context in the low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Crystalaire homeowners reasonably relied on and knowingly bought into when purchasing their homes. Of specific concern, we are alarmed and disappointed to see that the current draft proposal would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences. Also concerning is that areas in the northwest and southeast of the city are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density. We are aware of the State mandates imposed upon cities to meet regional housing needs and the requirement to support a reasonable certified Housing Element for the City of Huntington Beach. We understand the consequences of non-compliance. We would fully support a Housing Overlay at a reasonable density not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft,but on all the industrial areas between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with Members of the City Council and the community,which options reduce densities in the subject industrial area. Crystalaire would be in favor of housing development within the following criteria: 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest) 2. No more than two-story buildings in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac in the HSSP area. 4. No more than three-story buildings in the HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November 1st to discuss the proposed Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make them consistent with the existing homes in the surrounding areas. Thank you for your consideration,and please feel free to contact us through our management company Elite Property Services,Inc. at(714)357-3159 if we can provide any additional input. Sincerely, Allan Litovsky,Esq. President of the Board of Directors Crystalaire Community Association Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: SeaGate Housing Element From:Yvi<yvicao@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 10:28 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:SeaGate Housing Element Dear Mayor Delgleize and members of the city council, My husband and I have been homeowners in the SeaGate community for the past 13 years. We purchased this as our first home together after we married and loved this neighborhood specifically for the family appeal and the great elementary school (Seacliff)that our future children would attend. We recently learned that there are plans to develop high density housing adjacent to our neighborhood on the northeast and southeast corners of Goldenwest and Ernest. We understand that there is a need for more housing in Huntington Beach and are not opposed to it, but are appalled and dismayed that such high density housing would be considered in our area. Not only would it be completely out of character for our single family home neighborhood but it would most likely cause redistricting of the elementary school for the children in our tract (which is a main selling point for young families purchasing homes in this neighborhood). We would like to see the following in the Housing Element. a. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) b. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) c. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. d. No more than 3 story buildings in the HSSP area. e. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. f. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive Thankyou for your consideration in this important matter. SUPPLEMENTAL Respectfully, COMMUNICATION Yvi and Allen Gomez SeaGate Community homeowners ;:, ;11!it Date: t t \111?09?"-- Agerraa item No:4__� Y ( 9U° 1 4Aiu1_Gomez Letter-Seagate Housing Element.pdf 2 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory villir .`� * r 11111111111 MINIMllllllMINIM395 394 44 = # INIIIII 39s 396 239 240 -.- - ' . Legend NMI rr III�IIII. I 3.22.. ..246 245 249 11 City Boundary i - I I Sites Inventory - � 0it,4; 250 302 111 -- 248 247 238 121122 . •", 1.1-1 '127.. 1 182 t, 4.0-fp 129 . ' 137 ., 83'1` '� 161 126 231r -- ` o 110 11 3 • 125160 f 384 r—286 _ r-� 254 "" '" 385 `'—387 ° 388 ' , _ %,o4 stiokowit { , "" 391 38L Li 89 - + /4 d We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Yvi Gomez Name: Ashford Lane/Yvi Gomez Street Name Only/Email: YCG Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Seagate Housing Element Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element.pdf From:Carol DiLibero <csiggy@hotmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 9:47 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Seagate Housing Element t 4 ®Letter- Seagate Housing Element Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043,USA You have received this email because teamdilibero(a gmail.com shared a document with you from GOOgIeTM Google Docs. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: II \aOrd-f - 1 Agenda Item No.; a_) "1 (t92 l ) 1 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: Qty of Iiunbr ton Beech 2021-22O1211 Hcueop Element°fur?'° Figure B-10.Site Inventory N 4l ri ft 1 �` ram; 7 44/ F ytr ro , 4K �- ; " , .. . a , p ' lillt 396 239 9' , L ry og0 , . '2 b 245"°? e 24- Siiwe rnwar [Ky ' t ° ;fit �w'. 302 'u1 1�1 itil- tad 4rr-...� �r! 3 15 S - , ' t 131 . ��1 i_ __ _ � � .fit" "' „. � ` `3t34��! +r! .R5 - � . 9I "3E75 387 : .; 396pp " We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: CAROL DILIBERO Street Name Only/Email: SHERWOOD DRIVE,csiggy@hotmail.com Signature/Initials: Card D•'L,bero Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Outrage letter and request from Seagate and Crystalaire homeowner Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element signed by Michelle Radcliffe.pdf From: Michelle Radcliffe<mradcliffe99@yahoo.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 9:12 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Outrage letter and request from Seagate and Crystalaire homeowner Dear Council, I hope that you will actually represent the concerns of our community and NOT go against the plan that we all relied on when choosing to live in HB. Please see attached letter. Thanks, Michelle Radcliffe, J. D. Crystalaire and Seagate resident SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Date:Meeting I1 \ 1\ a- 1 Age, rNo.;�1a Li ( ? .qm October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory i ,; ,t Alyce! ' '' • 'I.' -- iIIIIIIIIII # k 3" 395 393 ';SAY F �tr III�����I��� 394 T' ..._ ; `,+ r 111111 398 396 m 240,{ Legend 1 ' 101111 ;_: '4.4' , 9 G4:a` WIIIII-: 397 246 249 II City Boundary I - , ,, Ems 440A di;. 250 302' 11 21 0 Sites Inventory `' V.' s �. ,t*�ri �.t:��t12.74 247 ' —182'-- '7 183 ' .r• ��:137 '_ kt.i z;'" _126 ,2331 '� 16 160 110 131"- '25 } ' , 3$4- a---286 _ 4 385—X 387 « . # I, obie 390- _ We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:33 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) From:Guillermo Family<nojonuggets@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 9:03 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: city of Huntington Beech 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory y "t r, :$ t to V vitro'." "'" 41 t k�r'r + ;p� eti4 411111111111 393 31 ,' s*MI11llflll 395 394 � -1'. 1 ' .: ;,:' Iflll1(il 398 — Er20%. °3' 4 :". Illl ■ 59� MS, �tr� .:÷, Legend *UN."'MIMI 3 r1 24f 245> 243 h II City Boundary I 4 .. _ • ., 302 .,111 o Sites Inventory at iNialw 121 : 48. 247 236 122 ' ' ,„127 ra 1 182 Mill 114 131 la- 12 _ n ...: ` .r 384 -1 I 28-. r get '», 391 I . . -, 384 1.1; 0,k2.10%-i, Ar:44,,,. r'r —3)3 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. A a > ` hyould likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five story elements s 9 t ';} s' ;IileAlitiONnor shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. Meef ng Date: 11 1112-09-a- 1 Agenda Item Rio.; c '111 (g-P-.9a.0) The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Preferably, please reconsider another area of Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Roy and Ashlee Guillermo 18736 Stratton Lane Homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Call to Action From: Paula Cook<pycook5@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 8:21 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Call to Action October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element"maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of GoidenSIMPLEWNIAL 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. COMMUNICATION 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. WON Dete: t l 119( q)-- Agenda dim No.; a.5#q ( .9X0) 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Paula Cook Park Path Dr. 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) From: RG Haas<rghaas7@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 7:09 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear council member, As an original homeowner in the Seagate community ( since 1998), I have been witness to steady growth in the HB community. With it, increased traffic, noise, and a much less calmer atmosphere in general. I am very opposed to the consideration of plans to adopt the proposed"housing element" and the high density housing plan. ("Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan) This is completely out of line with the current structure and character of this community. Not only an increase in density of units but the associated elevation Of structures. As noted at a recent homeowners meeting: The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwt � Ernest) COMMUNICATION 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 1 Meeting Date: 11 I anal 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: R. Gordon Haas Street Name Only/Email: Foxboro Circle/rghaas@gmail.com Signature/Initials: RGH 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:37 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Concerns Regarding High Density Housing Development From: F Spates<ljagpri@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 4:00 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Concerns Regarding High Density Housing Development SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 11 ( 1 19(fef)— Agenda Item No. LIN smir Poo (11 * dter LI) (11 2 3 .0' . t Awl ssiC 4*.° II ("13 •moo ii i = file . Nil ler C moo .0 1150 0 col) *siomi C r, 46 *ow* 400 , 0 Z ' 0171, Xi*. LI11.11 I 0 SONO IOC C (101 a cm) •000 C44 Oil OD (110) 4 at 4110 *1 010114 91.4. tet) 14 1 0 0 713 1 4.4 4 Sent from my iPad 5 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:37 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Concerns Regarding High Density Plan From: F Spates<ljagpri@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 4:02 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Concerns Regarding High Density Plan w t . s 'iP LICA T O",' jj/L12Q_jl._.__ Agenda Item Rio.. aS#1/ a -96 eo 1 •. 1 �f LPL r POW too) Cr i saaa rtkol , y 2 3 411111 CZ Usi (143 0per LI lt* 7* If,:!,,,.. -,,,,-...1 4.,. x t cid t o IMF aam., smiliS N Sent from my iPad 5 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:39 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element Ray Flynn.pdf From: Raymond J Flynn<rjflynn.hb@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 1:01 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element (Nov.1, 2022, City Council Meeting) The signed PDF attached explains my objections to the proposed "Housing Element" and proposed high-density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan. Raymond J. Flynn SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meanng Date: (1 l 1 1 Agenda Item No.; 5 Ll (A9 -9069 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Fi•< =- • E .y�`�9�cy Y C [ € 1 39.L. t Lrpend 1 . � err 11 City Boundary o sites Inventory i ::: ?:,-1-,.:J.) .., r :.. t 16•, �r •,306 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac)anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393&394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: 1 L4 N Street Name Only/Email: pkossoi5 CT EA. I {J c lr'n ` k.6 4Q' `- co Signature/Initials: k Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:38 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Seagate Housing Element-Letter Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element-10-30-2022.pdf From: Keri Lee-Hanamura<kleehanamura@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 3:04 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Seagate Housing Element-Letter Hello, Please find the attached letter regarding the proposed development within the Seagate Community. Respectfully, Bryan Hanamura SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION M `tinq Date: 11 1 a a 1 Aged !ten Rlo. �±,_ .-_a Q� October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 8-10:Site Inventory d, i ice''' "14 1J ai t 414, . "�f IIIIIIIIIII! "° ' ' 395 394'i r' ", '". t. flllillllllll IIAI(ill 398 ' p <� Legend 4' IIIIiI�■ 396 el 24Q a_ City Boundary 1 F. wit 3976Est 249 Sites Inventory *�au 2`Q 302 , ',111 121 w 12748 1, 238 i' 1822 T .x �. 129- =._,137 83126 `" '231' 161 spI110,131 ,384. 4--28E _ 254 385 i _ ��387 �`'g 386 ". 388 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Bryan and Ken Hanamura Name: Calera Lane/kleehanamura@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: BH and KJLH Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:38 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Letter - Seagate Element - Ilse deBruin/Shaun Hansen Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: Ilse de Bruin<ilsedbza@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 3:51 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Letter-Seagate Element- Ilse deBruin/Shaun Hansen Please find signed letter attached Ilse SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:_4 fin^-, AgenciP Item nlo.• ,99 -9640 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT lover: Figure B-10:Site Inventory ;,,ram' u r_IIIIIIIIIIII 39s 39 ,, '' 0 e (IIIIIIIIIIII 3s4 _ , thl gr. `e. 11 II�IIIIII ass ®24o3T . ". � nd INtMIME 396 ,rr _Lage : wi.eIII1III1 397 246 � 24 � ' II City Boundary I '; 2sorml`` ® r Sites Inventory *4."4` 247 " 1211 ' .5' - } >" tt"4iC12748 ""182 -ww ae is 129. „t1-17"" ... 83:726 ' 231' '`761 .- Z � 110 131« C. 125 _ , ' :. 4-7=254 s; + .••, 4 yr" ,y ''385—" '387 ••,d �� �`� 3881 ...,„..4.464x........s. °z.„ 391 389 . �- We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Ilse deBruin Name: 18793 Roxbury Lane Street Name Only/Email: Ilse DeBruin and Shaun Hansen Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:43 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element - SS.pdf From:Sergey Sedykin<sshb67@msn.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 2:17 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) UPP:,.LEMENT L COMMUNICATION Date: Ape itkr, .:.. ;#' _19a--q ) o October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: CtY of HUnlirctan Beach 2021-202S Houeog Elern n1 D APT Figure B-1 D_Site Inventory ,- i ,,,,,, . . , - .... 14 i ; n ° j� . //41 I Chy >;ou Er►dary I i r k 0 5itee Invgritofy , "- , � 1 i ;. % 1 s121it, /'2 "le,• - . L. �. .4,- • '‘' ,:14.-.; a _ 1 11. 4‘ , .{ 25.,„ , 38 , will ri �C .�' O " - ma r, ,,, 3 a 9 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Sergey Sedykin&Olga Sedykina Street Name Only/Email: 7411 Siena Drive, Huntington Beach,CA 82648 Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:42 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Opposition to Proposed Excessive High Density Housing in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Area From: M. David Cole, MD<mdcole02@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 3:54 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Opposition to Proposed Excessive High Density Housing in the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Area I would like to add my voice of opposition to the current plans, as listed below, to add excessive high density housing developments to the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area. I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH POINTS A THOUGH D BELOW AND WILL BE MONITORING THE OPINIONS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE OUTCOMES OF THIS ISSUE TO DECIDE HOW I VOTE IN FUTURE ELECTIONS. Sincerely, M. David Cole,MD A. The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)calls for the development of residences at amaximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac)anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest a Ernest(lots 393 Et 394)a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac which would irreparably change the character of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. B. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? C. We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element"maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach"cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. D. We would like to see the following in the Housing Element. a. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 Et 394(northeast corner of Goldenwest 8 Ernest) b. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 Et 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest Et Ernest) c. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. d. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. e. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. f. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 11 1\ a'' 1 Agenda ram No.; SQL( Cad--tap) Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:41 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element Kerry Flynn.pdf From: Kerry Flynn<kerry.flynn@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 5:22 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element Agenda Item No. 22-906 Housing Element(Nov.1, 2022, City Council Meeting) The signed PDF attached explains my objections to the proposed "Housing Element" and proposed high-density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan. Kerry Flynn Share and Care Always! Kerry Flynn SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION kleeMng Date: 11 i I j9o - 1190a9-- Agenda itom SS ( . ?0) October 28,2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1,2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory q , +6;r iat w . ICtS7 , ,, : a ri II City Boundary ., 7?'S4 r...I , t ' o Sites Inventoryow, 3 , Ee i,_ a,fix it , :, .- C:tj '`'y Rj lai' cg Ill •- - , 4 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach.Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: y .Kerry/ 3 FnA Street Name Only/Email: FrOE)r eCt 1c. k€rt-gl A @ m t',c.D Signature/Initials: 152.e./7 5.,/,,r,,_.) Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:40 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Housing project Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: Danny Nguyen<dan.mnguyen911@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 29, 2022 7:59 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Housing project Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, Please reconsider the proposal. Best Regards, Danny Nguyen. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION meant!Die: _, a Aosode 4t3r143.7„ SS / (9d.90 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory .1 tit !{ ;v. ax . ,r, "IIIIIIIIIIII 39' °� 1- , �a 395 394 r' i s Ilillllllllll �- „ *A. ' II IIIIII 398 396 NE 24Q2i�' 4 �.,} Legend MOM ,,.=a Y 4- 4 + 1II�1111 397 246 11 City Boundary I : 4-,, _-, ,,' ® 24. I= Sites Inventory1 25 0 302 ,111 --• # illiRir 48 247 1211 r : ` ► 127 --- 1 . 182 ° : 129�' -- .._.137 I �` ,126j „'�231 1b16 Q NW zak) i -f 115 125 �.4 4 .. 13i 4— 286 .""'!. .'- ��� '< - �'-. �j�254 - . sw • J� 385 ;' 387 11,,, ririq. Lit 396 . fr'iw%air - 391 � 4 _34*. 4,Scoreso . � ; 389 i 39Q A, We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Danny Nguyen Name: Fairfax lane / dan.mnguyen911@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: DN Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:40 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Agenda Item 22-906 Attachments: City letter 2.pdf From: don smith<gbm503@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 7:37 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Item 22-906 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: I I 91")?-9"' Aga Item No.: � 11 October 28,2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO.22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach _,m__ - �� Nwe._ �_ --I 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 8-10:Site Inventory . .,. 'L* 4 ' -: .:::,..4.-4:piet 39 °•�; 395 39`4 .. .- ,,. A g ft.4 4 398 4, " . —`24Q 1 ; Legend .—.„.7.-, - -- _ 1239..2441 .-' 39,1 - 2r. 2_45 249 II City Boundary % "`` ''"T '"" o Sites Inventory L_339 -'-8 25Q 3Q2 r .TI1 121 -, - 248,�247;238 122 127_ a t'� 182 129` . 137 $3` g 1 126 231 �_ 11Q i31 �'ST'^— '25 1ti0_ o. { s---286 384—� .—.t 2c,4 3S5- `' 387 A[--._ +f- ii, •, ., ,t, ...,L.��388 3ii 389 . _: We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du Jac.The H oily- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac)anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393&394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: NA CA, K•-• Street Name Only/Email: L ir v / t-A. ? n k B+ r Signature/Initials: j-Y---(0•-i-LySLi 2 / •L) / t.5 e j j e- ti rz + Q n r-rt CL-1 .p q c k e7 5r a. 1 1 CZ, a_ c \1 e.-3 h »-) -<S { 1 �^ yZ \- '• S3 • W k CI v CZ, c-�.a �.! C 1,1. .�? ac.� - ti't�. cE ien v Ls v1._i c�T de a(I W e C..a h W C e_r— C) e e' ( QUO OS. Th; r• kCA- rn C r e. i.D ci e w © Lc ici S2 e n e e' ci e? ` Cr t re,J�d�F� cam} w t r1=7 rvi • �.� P •• e- i. 1 t -Ct Ci. V c \I e.c \c a c e Ck 3 S C.�Ys'7 e, ,� K c>`� v� Q �C, G' ue-A S a K-e- < r) e r y p , CAI..1r- Ct e.nit 5 a ‘C- C sc t .1 5 Sn c: k4. "c t l y �`''1 -E �, e- p p s : A c,‘�i'l '� , where wi1� 1 44,� c,1dai cn °L.\ � 1e&+rt vy.7 T G U r� C� F • �-fir[ Y r7 c l GiA f..-)»Cam` Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:40 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Agenda Item 22-906 Attachments: City letter 1.pdf From: don smith <gbm503@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2022 7:35 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Item 22-906 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: I I f I 12Da- Agenda III Pao.• `[ i October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO.22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory c:ts7 Slificit , - r393 IN1 395 394 MU 398' 9i2401 LegendAft }{�(�t 396 244 I I City Boundary I iiri ' --- 1248 245 9 o Sites inventory .339 ti 8 25 302 *111 121 248. 247 238 ,I; **• 127 t 182 am.`: 129 ' *137 83 326 231 161 110 1 125 160 ' 266 384 -- 254 385 -387 3'- ..+...--T-'` , �86 388 391 369 .. r ': _ We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393& 394)a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du jac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach '-) Name: vA att 0 bw '5Dj 4-4) U)lctc I , Co 141 Street Name Only/Email: L Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:43 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Me! `.,32 Date: 11 11 1909' From: Marina Wishengrad <marinawishengrad@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:37 AM � LI (9(9-- 9c5L9)To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> ge I h s�b.; Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, My husband and I purchased our home in the Seagate community a little over a year and a half ago. When we purchased our home,the main draw was Seacliff Elementary, and the quietness of the surrounding area. The draft proposal with plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density will GREATLY change the atmosphere of our neighborhood, and could risk the chances of our children attending Sea Cliff Elementary. As a homeowner of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest(lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) i 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Marins Wishengrad Homeowner of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:04 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Carl J.Temple Seagate Resident Request Attachments: CJTemple102822.pdf From:Temple Carl <temple1016@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 10:52 AM To: Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Carl J.Temple Seagate Resident Request Dear Cathy, I am pleased to introduce myself as a 33 year resident of the City of Huntington Beach. I have been a property owner for 33 years and an original owner in the Seagate neighborhood since 1997. I am reaching out to you, City staff and the City Council members to reduce this proposed and outrageous density increase from current 25 dwelling units/acre in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) to 70 dwelling units/acre. This scale of development will do significant harm to the over 800 homeowners within the HSSP neighborhoods for decades to come. it is clear the proposed zoning changes to the HSSP do not equitably include other geographic areas in the City. There are many other options that include already in place transportation infrastructure and would not dramatically increase traffic, noise in HSSP area. It is unfair for City planners to propose this level of density in largely single-family neighborhood tracts where homeowners within Seagate may lose something as basic as sunlight due to multi-story, high density dwellings that may be proposed for current streets such as Ernest Avenue. Please see the attached request and detail from our neighborhood owners. We urge you, other City staff and City Council members to continue to explore better geographic zoning options and immediately address this inequitable draft zoning plan for HSSP. Sincerely, Carl J. Temple temple1016(c yahoo.com 714.402.7922 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Ieeting Date: I I I\909g, Agenda Item No.; #`[ ( qct�) i October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1,2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT c !7 gend r Le city Boundary 1,1 3B'7 2461245' - i✓ 3C Sites inverdory � 339-r.48* � � - 121 rr�..w --. 4t .2L - 8;-�225b.:72382' 111 8 a 3126 in286 .. t.. p 38 4 ..,.." _ ��...� Il' ''; "'' 254 o+ '„<iii " . +, . 385 "'-387 i , 386 , f° ^389 t. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: C41/1 . 1 ` j c. dl�1 ot!, Gc�wi Street Name Only/Email: .>7 v�lI4O11 LA I1 t 4-'6 /L 1v G Signature/Initials: e44-1'' t Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:08 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Approve Housing Element 6th Cycle From: Homeless United Huntington Beach <homelessunitedhb@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:25 AM To: Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike<Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik <Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Carr, Kim<Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie<Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Re: Approve Housing Element 6th Cycle Dear Mayor Delgleize and City Council Members, We at Homeless United Huntington Beach have been tracking the development of the Housing Element - 6th Cycle for nearly 2 years. It has taken that amount of time for most of us to begin to understand the importance of this document and what goes into it. We continue to learn things related to homelessness and affordable housing as a result of this document and its importance in solving these problems. We want to thank our elected officials, the Planning Department staff, county representatives for meeting with us and giving presentations to HUHB and public workshops for the past few years. These presentations never failed to inform us of the purpose of the Housing Element, what issues it addresses and what the consequences are to a jurisdiction that does not have an approved document in place. We believe that the document, September 23, 2022 HE Version, is worthy of your support and ask that the city council approve it by November 15th. Delay and any major edits will cause serious penalties to the city. The staff and consultants have done a magnanimous job in identifying more than sufficient sites to meet the demand for housing over the next 8 years in our city. Once this document is approved, it will be up to property owners to develop these properties that will reach the goals of providing affordable housing stock. SL1PPLEMENTAL Thank you, COMMUNICATION Jenny Braithwaite Karen Carroll =.;; ate: I' l I , OS . Shirley Detloff 1 ends item Rio.; ( - lUcO) Pat Goodman Gigi Jackson Laura Sire Need Help - Give Help: 211 OC - County of Orange Social Services 24/7 Hotline or www.211oc.org City of Huntington Beach,Homeless Solutions www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/homelessness/ HOMELESS UNITED T A HomelessUnitedHB@gmail.com www.facebook.com/pg/HomelessUnitedHB/posts/ HUHB is a network of representatives from the faith communities, non-profits and advocates for those in need of clean, safe, affordable housing in our city. HUHB usually meets are held on the 3rd Thursday of every month, 7:00 pm, via Zoom. You may mail inquiries c/o CUMC, 6652 Heil Ave., Huntington Beach 92647 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:39 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Housing Development Attachments: 061 Board Letter to City Council re Housing Element 221028.docx From:Glen Williams<Glen_Williams@CEl.com> Sent:Sunday, October 30, 2022 8:28 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Housing Development Glen Williams Senior Project Manager CUPERTINO ELECTRIC INC. 8739 Dice Road I Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 T: (562) 641-2412 I C: (562) 201-3224 I CEI.COM S:J..::;,PLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meet a ._ _44a22- 4 �Agenda itemo; (u - 00 October 28,2022 SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: We are the Cape Ann Homeowners Association Board Members and represent the homeowners in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP). Many of our members are original homeowners that have lived in Huntington Beach for over 20 years. As part of the Seagate Community Association, we held a Town Hall meeting with nearly 75 homeowners on Sunday,October 23rd to address the proposed Housing Element. All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community. Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the plan calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394)a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. Because of the low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area,we are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. 70 du/ac is ten times the density of our neighborhood and would irreparably change the character of our community.It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, projects would be even higher and more dense. This type of urban development has no context in the low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Bel Air homeowners knowingly bought into when purchasing their homes. Of specific concern,we are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences. Also concerning is that areas in the northwest& southeast of the City are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density. We are aware of the mandates the State has put on cities to meet their regional housing needs and support a reasonable certified Housing Element for the City of Huntington Beach and understand the consequences of not having one. We would fully support a Housing Overlay at a reasonable density not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft,but on all the industrial area between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with councilmembers and the community which reduce densities in the subject industrial area. The Bel Air Board of Directors would be in favor of any housing development the includes the following. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394(northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November 1St to discuss the proposed Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make it more consistent with homes in the surrounding areas. Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to contact us. Cape Ann Homeowners Association Board of Directors Glen Williams—President Chris Musser-Vice—President Judy Durante—Treasurer Carla Dispalatro- Secretary Jennifer Kanowsky—Director Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:20 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO.22-906 Housing Element Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element (Stratton Lane).pdf From:wcseetoo@gmail.com <wcseetoo@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 12:11 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element Hi City Council, Please find the attached proposed letter from homeowner of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach. Thanks, Wai-Cheng Seetoo Sent from Mail for Windows SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION meeting Dale: I I I l 209-g Agenda Item No.; $Y ( . ôi0) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach , 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory 1 , ..F +rf,t floe . S .. if y� -- . , K 'I".4 II1II�IIII i393'a, , , . nlIIIIIIIIIIII 395 394 +r :�.rr -J ' s• , !. .. ItiIIIIII 398 396 _ 240 S AA .+�+ IIIIIi„„ Legend �ia,.� ,*IIII i 3�7 246 244 " 249- itie II City Boundary d , ` -''. 123 Sites Inventory r` ' `'°r'�48 �47 111 1211 22 r. IY t lr,� J 182,. - i 137 .> ._> _ . 126 231r 161 - t`:110 inT• 125160 ". s ""'ow* . 384 4 4- 286 A it A r�254 387 I! 2�. ,,,....44. 391- . 8988 i '$4 Afte We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Wai-Cheng Seetoo Name: 18747 Stratton Lane Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:19 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: HB City Council Agenda Item 22-906 Housing Element Attachments: Pathak Bharat_HB City Concil Agenda Item, 22-906 Housing Element, 10-31-22.pdf From: Bharat Pathak<jaimabp306@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:07 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: HB City Council Agenda Item 22-906 Housing Element Honorable Mayor Delgleize and Respected City Council Members, Please find the attached letter regarding the above subject matter. Thank you. Respectfully, Bharat Pathak SeaGate Community Latigo Drive, HB 92648 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUN/CATION Meating Data: ,, ! 1 1 a0'ea-___ Agenda Item lsio.g ss q ( - 1900 i October 28,2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1,2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory A rF rY{r� _" IIIIII1111 393,, • UU11111111' 395 3s4 ,rn'11hII� 398 396—~ -.40'T . !i 239 4s Largfnd ,r i JrJt`m 11 City Boundary 246 245 249 c Sites Inventory 4- � , 250 3-8 111 121 247�- . - ST 27.c. 37 1 126 2311G1 r., 110 131 YYY 125 160 38.—� 286 ** t, 254 ,3:55__A l� 1 387 i 3388 "6 „�*v' 341389 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Bharat H. Pathak Name: Latigo Drive/jaimabp306@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: i*?(J4.*1-(:/ //1"' Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:19 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Seagate Community Call-To-Action Letter(Signed) Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: Kamil Sliwinski<sliwinski@ymail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:05 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Seagate Community Call-To-Action Letter(Signed) Please see attached. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION !Weeding Dee: @ s J 1 �O7' "'6g'?n:s' iturn i',io.5 Vi_ 1 Kamil Sliwinski Digital Marketing Specialist L, (714) 580-2059 sliwinski gymail.com Orange County,CA /Pr 0 2 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B•10:Site Inventory .14 x 14 34': ?•F if 444141111111111111 395 . 393 .. 4 ,+ . ,. 1111111111M 394 , r ►..., c ,4 l ,.. '-� Ii1III ll 398 240 '4 -. -. ''All AMINO 396 239 .. *- Lagend .ram..a mewls 397 II City Boundary # i f - j 246 1247 245 245 ' y 30-2 o Sites Inventory 0 0 r.a w 250 238 111 121 48 ,.., 137 29 l ,r�*".. 83.126 231 - 16160 '. 110 125 r,w+ ,., 131 .d �-286 T.' i»" , ti, 384—, .--1 254 h385 " 387 m 8 w' I� 86 t. 388`' 391 3 89 �* 0 0 41t,,..441‘,...„ We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Kamil Sliwinski Name: Breezy Lane Street Name Only/Email: KS Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Jun, Catherine Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:51 AM To: Agenda Alerts Cc: Levin, Shannon; Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Carl J.Temple Seagate Resident Request Attachments: CJTemple102822.pdf FYI Catherine From:Temple Carl <temple1016@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 11:29 AM To:Jun, Catherine<catherine.jun@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Carl J.Temple Seagate Resident Request Dear Catherine, I am pleased to introduce myself as a 33 year resident of the City of Huntington Beach. I have been a property owner for 33 years and an original owner in the Seagate neighborhood since 1997. I am reaching out to you,City staff and the City Council members to reduce this proposed and outrageous density increase from current 25 dwelling units/acre in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP)to 70 dwelling units/acre.This scale of development will do significant harm to the over 800 homeowners within the HSSP neighborhoods for decades to come. it is clear the proposed zoning changes to the HSSP do not equitably include other geographic areas in the City. There are many other options that include already in place transportation infrastructure and would not dramatically increase traffic,noise in HSSP area. It is unfair for City planners to propose this level of density in largely single-family neighborhood tracts where homeowners within Seagate may lose something as basic as sunlight due to multi-story,high density dwellings that may be proposed for current streets such as Ernest Avenue. Please see the attached request and detail from our neighborhood owners. We urge you,other City staff and City Council members to continue to explore better geographic zoning options and immediately address this inequitable draft zoning plan for HSSP. Sincerely, Carl J.Temple temple 1016na,yahoo.com 714.402.7922 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: II I a� Agenda Item t4o.: (2&9SO) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO.22-906 Housing Element(November 1,2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Sits Inventory 14 343if%."*. i ,. illlii 398 • d '�+�' illlitii 396 : tsgen II CityBoundary t 39 `246 r ell Sites Inventory 339 -4L8 25. 302 111 t= 248 247 1211 "4* 8 .126 ' 231 ' • 16160 AtifaV +r+ ` ` it ,110 131 25 , s'' '3'38851.4.1-11 .41471-7 254 ," y , t j .4 386 388 Ntitvisilievit iv We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac)anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393&394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Reach.Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: �. �'�i✓I'I i 1!ievL - Street Name Only/Email: 7 vtf/Oh Lam- -1,044 )L1o1G 'f-ytt►po, cool Signature/Initials: ( ' ' ( - (�4 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:41 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Agenda Item No 22-906 Housing Element Attachments: IMG_0856.pdf; IMG_0857.pdf From: Lena Vergara <lenakennedyv@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:39 AM To: Delgleize, Barbara <Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Agenda Item No 22-906 Housing Element Dear Mayor Delgleize and Council Members- I am writing to express my opposition to the current draft proposal to add 70 du/ac to the Holly Seacliff Area. Please see my attached signed letter. Thank you Lena Vergara SUPPLEMENTAL COIAMUNICATION i late: Ill) 19099- Agenda'tom fro.; i October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO.22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory ,,, z,t,7 art^ # + - a-�'lLtli1il 393 w `' �,UM! 345 39"4 s SO'i. �lllllll 398 mg 396 240 r,-`.. ' 'e 4'.•. ' 1111� Legend rAr,+se 239 244 !�+ ,�T," I City Boundary 249 r .+ O Sites Inventory u.: Jft._...� ,,...x,..EMTil121 18 - k 29 .► c- .137 83—' - 231 `161; '� --------- - 1.o 131, us16Q , 4 a---286 Y *---254 41 A 3 .. -I.t 385 _ ..4 387 i , ,. 4 , 386 "'t 04 4s F 39,1 ` -' 3396 a9 a 11 ' ! + : We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393&394)a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach.Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? i We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Le\cl VOVoria___ Street Name Only/Email: 6t1 IV Signature/Initials: 7/1A. ‘ V v _----- Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 11:35 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Huntington Beach Housing Element Attachments: 2210 SNA Board Letrter to City Council re Housing Element.docx From: Matt Braun<matt.braun4@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:34 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Delgleize, Barbara<Barbara.Delgleize@surfcity-hb.org>; Posey, Mike <Mike.Posey@surfcity-hb.org>; Carr, Kim <Kim.Carr@surfcity-hb.org>; Peterson, Erik<Erik.Peterson@surfcity-hb.org>; Kalmick, Dan<Dan.Kalmick@surfcity-hb.org>; Moser, Natalie<Natalie.Moser@surfcity-hb.org>; Bolton, Rhonda <Rhonda.Bolton@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy<CFikes@surfcity-hb.org>;Zelinka,Al <AI.Zelinka@surfcity-hb.org>; Villasenor,Jennifer<JVillasenor@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: steve schultz<steve@schultzassociates.com>; Diane R Fullerton <dfulle1066@aol.com>; Scott Kien <skkien@yahoo.com>; Brian Knorr<hbsurfer1967@gmail.com> Subject: Huntington Beach Housing Element Members of the City Council, On behalf of the other board members and the hundreds of homeowners within the Sherwood homeowners association, I am submitting the attached letter that discusses our strong opposition to the current housing element proposal of 70 dwelling units/acre on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest and the area bounded by Goldenwest, Garfield, Ernest and Stewart that are entirely out of character with the established surrounding area. We are also including alternative solutions that we believe would help to maintain the character of the neighborhood while still allowing the city to meet the required housing element guidelines. Thank you, Sherwood Homeowners Association gk Ni U N1CATION Mei*..4 D.46:.„. ll i 1 A. ,ftda item No.; (g9 / -904, October 28, 2022 SUBJECT: 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT CANDIDATE SITES Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: We are the Sherwood Neighborhood Association Board Members and represent the 234 homeowners in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan(HSSP). Many of our members are original homeowners that have lived in Huntington Beach for over 20 years. As part of the Seagate Community Association, we held a Town Hall meeting with nearly 75 homeowners on Sunday, October 23rd to address the proposed Housing Element. All but one of the homeowners in attendance were not even aware of the proposed changes to the areas immediately surrounding their community. Our homes located in the HSSP were purchased with the understanding that the plan calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. Because of the low-density nature of the HSSP and its surrounding area, we are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. 70 du/ac is ten times the density of our neighborhood and would irreparably change the character of our community. It is entirely out of scale with the 25 du/ac maximum in the larger HSSP. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height(or at least include five-story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. With density bonuses, projects would be even higher and more dense. We are very concerned that projects at that height could include windows, balconies, and/or roof decks that would negatively impact the privacy of Sherwood homeowners. This type of urban development has no context in the low density nature of the surrounding area and is not what Sherwood homeowners knowingly bought into when purchasing their homes. Of specific concern, we are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac at the northeast corner of Ernest Drive and Goldenwest Street directly adjacent to the backyards of homeowners that live on Ambrose Lane and Foxboro Circle. These homes would be negatively impacted by development at that density just over their back yard fences. Also concerning is that areas in the northwest& southeast of the City are not affected by the Housing Plan with any increase in density. We are aware of the mandates the State has put on cities to meet their regional housing needs and support a reasonable certified Housing Element for the City of Huntington Beach and understand the consequences of not having one. We would fully support a Housing Overlay at a reasonable density not only on the industrial area shown in the latest draft, but on all the industrial area between Goldenwest/Ernest/Gothard/Garfield. We understand that options are being prepared to share with councilmembers and the community which reduce densities in the subject industrial area. The Sherwood Board of Directors would be in favor of any housing development the includes the following. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We appreciate the City Council for holding a study session on November 1st to discuss the proposed Housing Element. We urge you to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities to make it more consistent with homes in the surrounding areas. Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to contact us. Sherwood Neighborhood Association Board of Directors Steve Schultz, President Diane Fullerton, Vice-President—Via phone Scott Kien, Treasurer Matt Braun, Secretary Brian Knorr—Director 10/31/22,3:29 PM Mail-Moore,Tania-Outlook FW:Hall Town Meeting-Nov 1st Fikes,Cathy<CFi kes@su rfcity-hb.org> Mon 10/31/2022 11.34 AM To:Agenda Alerts<AgendaAlerts@surfcity-hb.org> 1 attachments(1 MB) Letter-Seagate Housing Element(1).pdt From:Ask Beth<beth@bethmccloskey.com> Sent:Monday,October 31,2022 11:02 AM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:Erik Walton<erikwalton@firstteam.com> Subject:Hall Town Meeting-Nov 1st Good morning, Please see the attached letter signed on my behalf.I am a local real estate agent that has been working with Donna Horn in the Seagate neighborhood for over 20 years.Our concerns are listed in the letter and will be read aloud by Erik Walton who will be representing Donna and I as we are both out of town. Thank you for your time in receipt of this information. Warmest regards, -Beth - Beth McCloskey McCLOSKEY&.CO. w it' 'sr, Huntington Beach Office A Licit 01930596 I(949)933-1851 � • bel.b.g skbelh.00m askbeth.corn 00©80000 FiRsTTEAm CHRISTI_ REAL ESTATE INTERNATIONAL REAL ES SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meettng Date: 11 ► Yd..hq -- Aqeode https://outlook.office365.com/mail/deeplink?Print 1/1 DocuSign Envelope ID:848709F1-BAE1-485F-B3E8-C2EE23563C00 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory i ,,t .pit j' +� , "'`` '; '.; ' ` , tt to . ' ro ram- t *; X zt, N46. r ' 3 vsi ,is . t' I ' 'et; L' 111111111111 NIIIIIIIIIII 395 4394� ' .1 .,' , MIIIII 398 240 �� f .a» iiiiii1• 396 239 244 —....., ' .' a •.�.. Legend 11111111 397 " . ., City Boundary j -� '4 246 245 249 CI Sites Inventory Wai [ rii .4 4 250 302 '.111 121 : 04_ Ik 't 1274..3 247 238 I 182 * 129: ,,. .�: . 137 »a: -x. 126 231 161 160 NOW 0 , �,110 131 ��28 125 - ' a x' 384- 4— si �,,,fti 254 .''tia `rt'etA '385 L-0 1,.....,... —387 ,...1.14,N?„.7713,.."‘„: .,. .‘"`, iv ,,:-";386 ',„--- ''', kot8 `1 388 N 39 risohe tifts . * 39Q 89 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? DocuSign Envelope ID:848709F1-BAE1-485F-B3E8-C2EE23563C00 We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Beth McCloskey Name: beth@askbeth.com Street Name Only/Email: DS DocuSigned by: Signature/Initials: 6 , A/tJL esk9 04, 7CCA4E15AF694B9... Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element - CLINES.pdf From:Carrie Lines<carriealines@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:16 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Please see attached letter, thank you. Carrie Lines Homeowner at Rockridge Drive, HB carriealines@gmail.com SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION WAIN te: . 1 AgendaAgeRda ROMNO.:. — ' October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory , -.I,' .0 ,,,,,i449st 4 7' * 4 8 14 Al i V M 1 AWL _.... A '* 4 rr 1 . 'rt �� ; z, ta' /, „* - .` Igo it I 395 393 3940r+wwK$ . 1/, . eh 398 -396- 240 I 1;244 . .... . t w" ;' 'fi ��, 239 L•g•nd so Mr MEM I 397 12_4_8_ 245 . "i249 .4. wII City Boundary I - .. , ; OE Sites Inventory ', 250 302 1111 ' R ef�248 247 23o 121122' ffi tot 127 182 1. r4.4, 129. 13T. ts126 231 r 181 l .1i .. 110 131 125 160 •* "� 384 172 i..{ 1 286 .". :� 254 "�"` ._. .4,;71 ,�` a "*38146, 5--X _19 ,_- 3867 1 ,....4004 �w 91 41ter: l 1.4 `390 8g # h We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Carrie Lines Name: Rockridge Drive, carriealines@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: CL Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Letter - Seagate Housing Element Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: Brian <mr.brian.rowe@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:17 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Letter-Seagate Housing Element Please review the attached letter in opposition to the proposed increase to housing density in the SeaGate neighborhood. Thank you, Brian Rowe SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: I t j ' 19-0n— Agenda Item No.t SS4-1( (ga'"9(I0 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B•10:Site inventory • + 1 , .far P <*_ * >. r Ic,,s t r �Y • N E1111111WI11 a Eal 1"µ, 394 '"" ".fir .� • (iIIhINIIN +. ' loll 398 396 240 ". \ K'. -. . a 1Il!Iit I239 244 _�. �� w%a♦and -�'IIIII;; 327 .. 249 III City Boundary ,; 246 245 t Sites Inventory l� a t r.r�* -* t, 250 302 111 121 No. . 1 127 48,• 247 2 8 1 182� ...,, •+ '• -6.• 44 4 131 7 ;126 231� 16Q F 110 131 T' 125 a 384 -{ 1 286 - 1"r 7 _ �-254 «... *� yz `- '`385-- . -e 386 � • Ntimat 391 ill ���e88 :II'r""" -"'444144(4y, s i 389 ", j- t 4r - 390 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach BRIAN ROWE Name: Sherwood Drive / mr.brian.rowe@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: a"" ` 441�w Signature/Initials: c Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:Approve Housing Element Original Message From: laura sire<Ilaurajjane@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:21 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: laura sire<Ilaurajjane@yahoo.com> Subject:Approve Housing Element Dear Mayor Delgleize and City Council Members, Hello there.This is Laura Sire. I'm writing as a proud member of Homeless United Huntington Beach. I've done research and work over the last couple of years with some of the HUHB members on the Housing Element,which has recently and finally been approved after 6 drafts.The hard work, perseverance, and patience of the City Staff, Planning Commission, and you our City Council, is to be commended for seeing this document through. There is an excellent email written and submitted to you on behalf of the HE committee and penned by Pat Goodman. She has stated everything perfectly. I'm just adding my urgent request that you approve the September 23rd, 2022 HE version as it is written so that we will have no further delays or penalties from the state.The exhaustive document sets forth all the statistics and facts needed to confirm the obvious:We need affordable housing in our city that will accommodate all of its residents including all levels of income (and those unhoused) starting now and continuing into the next 8 years. It sets forth a plan for accomplishing this. I came to Huntington Beach with my family at the age of 14.The city and housing needs have, of course, changed over the past 60 years.Those who oppose the HE do not appear to accept this change, and prefer to see it as a mandate, not the flexible plan that it is. Please be the forward thinking and fair-minded democratic governing body I know you to be. Approve this document which will provide a housing plan that will carry us into a better, brighter future. Thank you, Laura Sire Member Homeless United Huntington Beach SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meek Date: I I I �0a3" Agenda Item No.; /11 (99-" lc i) Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element - NLINES.pdf Original Message From: Nicholas Lines<nlines177@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:27 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Re:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Sent from my iPhone SUPP L t:<M L NTA October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory cs "1, .a 14 4 CO tt r z 3 3 y .� ,., i. xa ' r 44 4 a.mayy� 9 rP S•T.3 I�N�N���� 395 3• .� _S ""°sillle.k, 1 P i41111111 398 _ '4, t a„ «,, Lague ' 0'r MIE 396 239 ��y. *.. ILYZ«,a I1, 397 �+r II City Boundary i " - ' 246 �� 249 1 . BD Sites Inventory I` 8 '+ 25Q. 121 N ,' 48 247 23. T . :;+'a ,s. -,/,.. ... 3 ,-. iP: 4 137' ..» .126 231 161 10.04i .1 . -110 131 us 160 43 . .t�, 385—�'r i 387 , � �ff 386 ` ` ,, a t' 388 r �" . 391 `�# 389 ram,: " 34 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Nicholas Lines Name: Rockridge Drive, nicholasblines@gmail.com Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: AIL Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: [Untitled].pdf From: Bunker, Gregory<Gregory.Bunker@disney.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:36 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and Members of the Huntington Beach City Council, Please see attached in regard to the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan. If you have any questions I can be reached at the phone number listed below. Thank you for your time, Greg Bunker 714-743-8664 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:. if/i / os9- 1 Agenda Item► o.; Ss f ad. .9t0 October 28,2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 8-10:Site Inventory EC r .w if 4' Tc _ipVI . i 4 t A Sag 4 INF .l•fil . AIL = ' g. 9 � C Legend t mi to.. 249 II City Boundae iris so � .. :�'�, 111 _.: cites Inventory � 48.' 2,47 -et, , 1e . .. 137 . �Ita�.tr siw �-d t.�►' 11" --"'"" - •.126 23 161 , `` 110 131t> 125160 y,: .384 r 284 4 ..- •3. . . 387 " * 386 .,.m...„ t . 388 10111. > > 91 ,.. nv. 3 89 .. ...ii.�1_ .390 " ► al... r " � a „L " . We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element. "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a.high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than.7 du/ac in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face.Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city.: We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: C i 7(G ._ .__. e.,, krei-- /Street Name Onl Email: s.A T" v-J. 4.- -7�PD Dt wiy/ SAL, -1\Signature/Initials: . aR / 7 Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan SP 7 RH Overlay Original Message From: Sharon Komin<sharonkomin@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 12:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan SP 7 RH Overlay Mayor Delgleize, Councilmembers Bolton, Carr, Kalmick, Moser, Peterson and Posey, Thank you for taking the time to hear my concerns. As a 25 year resident of Huntington Beach, I am opposed to the Ellis- Goldenwest Specific Plan SP7 Overlay included in the High Density Housing Rezoning Overlay-ZTA 22-006 for multiple reasons: -the proposed overlay violates the Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan that was adopted by the city in June 1989 and states very specifically that there will be only single family dwellings with a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet and a minimum 15,000 net square feet for 20%of the lots -high density housing will negatively impact the area schools with overcrowding as well as all HB schools that will have to be redistricted -traffic and the inevitable shortage of parking at high density developments would be greatly increased with new streets going through our neighborhood which has no sidewalks and is utilized by many for exercise and activities -it was disappointing that impacted residents were not made aware of a proposed plan that began last February -recently developed high density housing on the Edinger corridor and at Beach & Ellis have, in my opinion, lacked a large enough minimum required set-back from the street as well as minimum required planting and soft scape to maintain the beauty of our city In addition, I am also opposed to the Holly SeaCliff Overlay for the above reasons as well as keeping Goldenwest from becoming the same as Beach Boulevard. Thank you again for your consideration of the above issues and the removal of the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff overlays which I am against. Sharon Komin SUP LE EN .L ` NI ATION Agenda flan No.; S'# (2-A -(o09) Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Seagate Housing Element Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: Matt Sliwinski<macieksliw@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 12:52 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Seagate Housing Element Hello, please find attached our letter regarding the above mentioned subject Matt Sliwinski Breezy Lane, Huntington Beach. r P 'LE EN1 A,L 1,,,:01116,111NICATION IMeeting Date: t I l 9,0 r}a- Agenda Item No.; cis i �l- - 90(0 1 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory 1. . .0 .1l Eit' #'it►• a .'. Ics INlllllill - :' '-; .., 'Vain 398 - 239 240 (r _ w�►�r'�, '. IIIIIf1 'i '- II 1 '"�1111-. 397 :246 245 •249 .s,.. I City Boundary I a": _ , ® Sites Invent 4 -lis—c, 302 5111"ory ` * ,. g -+---- 12112• 48 47; ' Y t. 1f12l1 t i 182^° { - .=4:31 ... - 137 .126 231 125 160 . hits,:.`':110 r 394 131 }1 286 4'C 6ZT Z :, .. t 385-" ! ., 387 *" -. r 1�'r` , 386 t 388r` i .. .391. t -{- ` i t isepuit 4 390 , We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Matt and Magdalena Sliwinski Name: Breezy Lane/ macieksliw@yahoo.com Street Name Only/Email: MS Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Concerns from a Seagate Resident Attachments: Letter%20-%20Seagate%20Housing%20Element.pdf.pdf From: Barbara Angeles Luecha <barbangeles@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 1:05 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Concerns from a Seagate Resident Dear Huntington Beach City Council members, Please consider the concerns of your Seagate neighbors regarding the new housing developments on Goldenwest. The attached letter highlights our desire to maintain a safe, family-friendly neighborhood. Please support our efforts to protect our children from being rezoned out out of Seacliff Elementary. Sincerely, Barbara Luecha Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ivieeting ate: ll , I 1 Agenda Item No.; *4 quo) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory "111 4 41# • .- Rh '. .J'.Y � ," ur t +i-1 .404-. .a . -r ' ." t ' 39 .imp `. ai i p''a dad , *-'"Mal IEEZ33 ' - ' '4: :)....r. Legend IMEI .s 4 "nflt 397 ;246 245 24 11 City Boundary iI. ® Sites Inventory ��- 250 302 111 ' �,,c 121 ''4"pl . �127 48. 247 122 .t. 13? 126 231 161 _w 'in 'r125160 " !I::, a*Yr 384131 -{ •---286 :; __emih rt Mw - '' �' >:'s� r-1 254 ,, - t, - „ 386 v, " 391 • 389 rt(.lfit We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:33 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element signed.pdf From: Peter Hart<pahart1@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 1:46 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element Dear members of the Huntington Beach City Council, Please see the attached letter in regards to Agenda Item No. 22-906 and my concerns on the impact it will have with my development (Seagate) and the surrounding areas, as the plan sits today. We are hopeful that the CIty Council will consider our concerns and input on this significant issue. Respectfully, Peter Hart Ashford Lane - Seagate SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: I I 1 Agenda Nam h 0.,c '*q WO) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory i -: r4, a 4.. 0,to.. * a ,i 395 393'. „' r"� t. *WI . :':fiiilUgiiil 439-4 '1' "''. t"�," ',: * �I������� 398 396 9 240 '" ,, 4 '"•,'41:.r t.gend 244 ;` *. 0a a lii�mi- 397 246 245 249 , 111 City Boundary ® Sites Inventory jakorta# 250 302 111 1Z1 "248.4 247 = 822 " '' 127a. ' 1 _ 183 -- 137 126 231+ _ 161 ... 110 131 �'125 16 Q 0 �` r 286 '*.� r a. 384 - 1 a. '"" " , t"—254 . '1. `3. ., ! `385 �� 387{. 86 . • "• $ .4rym ' '*-, '-3388 " E i,.....0 , rw ,. , ,391 tAlrei * - * 4 '- 389 '1 r ) c ate w We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Peter Hart Name: Ashford Lane/hb-harts@socal.rr.com Street Name Only/Email: fD yi/ - PAH Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Letter- Seagate Housing Element.pdf Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf From: nataliearvesen<nataliearvesen@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 2:07 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Letter-Seagate Housing Element.pdf Kind regards, Natalie Arvesen SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Data: it\ \'�tYd'�— Agenda Item No.; LI ( - c' 7) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory ‘r 0 "Ai; . "*" It r.:',".. l' ' , 4'... 11111111IIIi 4 iiiilllllllll INIIIIII 398 396 240 L:g�nd No I11�N� 3�7 239® _ . II City Boundary 1 246 245 249 Ell Sites Inventory 448° 1501. "1 121 248 247+235 182 ir* � 127 131 ..,.. ,r 129 .-83 ' 161 ,3 --N, 126 231 ' 110 131 12516Q .� , ''', 384 - I �T 286 11 i r 1 254 '.. 1` 1 385'.. r 387 .. �l+v.4. 386 '*ire' fit. 44 rrt 391 w 88 ' illet. +Now ,y,�+ 3 89 �t r i We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Steve City.pdf From: stevefought@aol.com <stevefought@aol.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 2:14 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Councilna surfcity-hb.orq) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest(lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. SUPPLEMENTAL ENTAL 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. COMMUNICATION 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. Meeting Dan: ?- 1 Age NOM No.; 4<aa",90(o) We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Steve Fought Street Name Only/Email: UPPER BAY DRIVE/ stevefoughtaol.com Signature/Initials: see attached PDF for signature 2 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of HL.i:igton Beach 2021-2029-sous rg Ele-iei:DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory t . w ham. ;. yvx ;;� s I -a * r —_ d 398 1 iW 2�G� s'*:. I'IN': Ls end �, . i 396 23 ' 2G LyII CIty Baundar�. i„- �= —' 2�6 245 ; 249: cites IrWentDr� ri,i �' 2"'*3G2; 111 121 11 ^2G8 21.7 238 122 127 1 182 ^4.0-4..4.00 r•Wa*12893 • 37 w 126 231 c6160 - 110 ;;;/// 12E a *7-4 '* 3841� 286 '* -385 ~`mac � ,,F-, —387 ..-M. " 3rc..\78 rt �-4, '-- 88 `�'" A., .;.. 391 4c. 390 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely he four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would he entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: J i £ v( 6-4// .rTc dr. rvy! ®'t40 L. Co /'z' 1 G-N 1 Street Name Only/Email: VIP EA- a 47 D/2 al r—c Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Cynthia - AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Cyn city.pdf From: stevefought@aol.com <stevefought@aol.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 2:17 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Cynthia -AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council(c�surfcity-hb.orq) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest(lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) ; LEMEN1 AL 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. COMMUNICATION 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. fk'of ifg Uatt: 1 I 1 rI 0 0 [T 1 Agenda Item No.: * "( ThLo 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Cynthia Fought Street Name Only/Email: UPPER BAY DRIVE/ cyn7528( gmail.com Signature/Initials: see attached PDF for signature 2 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Hunt ngton Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B•10:Site Inventory aid' w+ "' z "#:,..rni 393 ' gai 1394 . 23 9^244 I I City Boundary i► l'f I ' 1'246 245{ * 249 250t302! 111 O Sites Inventory 121 "" 248 247.238 1$22 �' ' 129 137 ,. 83126 231 16160 . w 110 13, I? " 28625 d ,� 384 -" { �4,N.,*--....t:,iI,..i.isL-.4: ,. c ,, 1. ..._..\c" _38 - x 4 4 :' - 385 387 :: . 391 hc{. z 39Q 89 " 14 ::_ Noti. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: C—Jrv7Ad ,4 7;4 e--/S1/ Street Name Onl Email: U- PPz p' 64,7 P'`'e z V C yN -7y2 0 0 (, A14/C - C CJ Y/ Signature/Initials: ((..,d,c?"-i _„.„(5€,....ii-- Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Letter regarding proposed High Density Housing Attachments: doc00017920221031132225.pdf From: David Walling<dpwalling@aol.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 2:23 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Letter regarding proposed High Density Housing Letter regarding proposed High Density Housing ��vv ii4 L MENTALpy ;'.',Ang Date: II 1 909-9- Agenda Item► o.: Ss4-1-1 (9a-R ) 1 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory 7cci‘ 7 /lllllNE 393 to. lfillN Ill 395 c394 f • !f111t11I 398411111J111111 240.T -,, _ * y,M ; . r Legend isMr ,„ 397 plEil 239®1 ', w..; 11 City Boundary „ .tad # 246 ISM , u" 75Q� T11 2, 1 , » Sites Inventory 339 448 „� w. ��t�: 12 1' opz -.tl" 48 247 Irv' it 122 182 - sy a.-u,:•1 9 i ;137 - �. = °126 .• 231 161 MOON ^ • �*-0111Q 131=_ 286 . `o`` w {, 384 ��" f—`254 ., v385-,' 387 ' y. ,€ 386 ; .�E; 2 it Y0 388 . 3908Q ,,' iM^ -1 We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: 1)�ViC1 P. ( _,1 I.- Street Name Only/Email: AC.-Kr cJ\57 P i) r--- 1J tLJ���:n�j �• co \/ ,aJ ---, - 1 Signature/Initials: ( _.) 447` Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Message from "cmAdmin0l" Attachments: 20221031145752530.pdf Original Message From: cityadministrator@surfcity-hb.org<cityadministrator@surfcity-hb.org> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 2:58 PM To: Levin, Shannon<Shannon.Levin@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Message from "cmAdmin0l" This E-mail was sent from "cmAdmin0l" (IM C4500). Scan Date: 10.31.2022 14:57:52 (-0700) Queries to: cityadministrator@surfcity-hb.org SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION UNICATION Meek t»: 11 1 IO2"d-� 1Agenda ibur .; S# Li (99 .Pao MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL October 23, 2022 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Cathy Fikes nd Johanna Stephenson 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Proposed Rezoning of the Brindle-Thomas Property Dear Members of the City Council: I was born in an American Concentration camp in Heart Mountain Wyoming in 1943. My parents raised me to work hard to earn a living and to achieve the American dream of owning a home in a nice neighborhood. I did just that and by spending my entire life savings at the time to own a home on Edwards Hill expecting to live out a quiet life in a neighborhood that my wife and I selected because of the large lots, low density,the walking areas afforded by the equestrian walkways,great schools for my children and grandchildren. Huntington Beach so far has done a good job of zoning and maintaining a reasonable separation of homes and businesses and low and high density housing. Responsible zoning is a must for any City to achieve its goals. I do understand that the State has some rules it pushes down the Cities that tries to equalize everything but that is not reality as it does not factor in the sacrifices and hard work that is required to own a nice home and also not all Cities are equal and not all Property Lots are not equal. For some people our life savings are represented in our house. The Edwards Hill area where I live is specifically bordered on its approximately 3 5/8 sides(Edwards, Ellis, Goldenwest, Garfield)with Single Family housing. The Brindle Thomas property would be completely out of place and a major eyesore to the City if multi storied affordable housing units were allowed to be built. One of The Planning Commission's primary role should be for responsible zoning to maintain the beauty of the City areas and use Transition Zones. This is not a transition plan but more like installing a City Park in the middle of the Redwood forest because some land is available because of a forest fire. All lots are not equal! The Planning Commissions proposal is so way out with this re zoning proposal it may warrant an investigation into who and why was this proposal made and why was it kept quiet for so long? I am a long time resident and look forward to a few more years around the sun here but I ask the City Council to reject the proposal by the Planning Commission to rezone the Brindle Thomas Property as it would just be an eye sore on an otherwise beautifully designed and planned City. I believe the City Council and Planning Commission can find a better suited transition location for affordable housing than having to ReZone the Brindle Thomas location from its originally intended purpose. Thanks for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Gary Okura, resident of Edwards Hill Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Proposed Holly-Seacliff Housing Development Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element.pdf Original Message From:Jennifer Rozolis-Hill<jenrozolishill@earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:00 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed Holly-Seacliff Housing Development To Whom It May Concern, We completely disagree with the new proposed housing development in the Holly-Seacliff area. It is an insanely large development that will negatively impact the quality of life for the surrounding neighborhoods. Attached please find the letter with details regarding this development. Regards, Thomas and Jennifer Rozolis-Hill SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 11 1 I a Agenda Item No.; 4/( - 9 1 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Nunenglrm Beach 2o21-2Q2 HouBmp Element DRAFt F ' A B-1q:$Poe Inventory '°l{., ,,Aerials! f t' — e y r t�. 7 � 4 f �iv�f tagend � 1 U City Boundary , tN.,, SiI Irnlwntary k 33x...==44b r^,-- 25 C 3-' 1 1.1 53.t26 •211 ..w ago, 4, • . . 11:. .3414131 II 12t It; ...45114 , ,a,„ „,,,,,,,, ,.. 3R 6 -.it I z.,,, 41111441.01 <4. rMc + ' ter ". ` 'I c.k. 3®38 #, We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4.No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, HuntingtonBeach Name: Thomas and Jennifer Rozolis-Hill Street Name Only/Email: Upper Bay Drive/jenrozolishill@earthlink.net Signature/Initials: TRH,Thomas Rozolis-Hill,and JRH,Jennifer Rozolis-Hill Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Concerns on High Density Housing Original Message From: F Spates<1jagpri@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:03 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Concerns on High Density Housing The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units per acre anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest and Ernest no more than 7 dwelling units per acre. The current"Housing Element" shows 70 dwelling units per acre which would irreparably change the character of our community and not be pleasing to the eye on Goldenwest or any neighbors backing up to this proposed out of place structure. If a plan is approved to build on lots 393 & 394, we would like to see no more than 2 story townhomes in the lot behind us with no decks or balconies facing us. Sent from m SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 11 � 20aP Agenda Item No.; s*i (Pa- 9C62 1 Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:34 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Protest Hamptons Affordable Housing Plans From: ruskeepop9798<ruskeepop9798@aol.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:26 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: ruskeepop9798<ruskeepop9798@aol.com>; nelpenter7@aol.com Subject: Protest Hamptons Affordable Housing Plans October 28, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL Huntington Beach City Council COMMUNICATION 2000 Main Street x s ling Date. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear City Council Members; Agenda Item No.: `4'"7 ( -9y, I am writing you to protest the development of property near my home for the purpose of affordable housing. The area where my family lives, along with several hundred other home owners, is not and never has been intended or zoned for structures with multi-resident occupancy in the design mode of large apartment houses or condominiums. The City's master plan, created over 30 years ago, designated our area for large lots with homes of corresponding size. When purchasing our home it was clear to us that the City of Huntington Beach (herein after referred to as The City) intended to create an upscale neighborhood with enhanced property values in order to increase City tax revenues. Now after 30 years, the City is attempting to break this fiscal covenant by infusing a financially upscale residential area with lower cost construction not originally envisioned or intended for our area. The City's community guidelines now in effect for several decades is being subverted to benefit The City's tax base and to monetize builders who otherwise could not afford to construct competitively priced housing within our city. Our area of Huntington Beach was intended to be an equestrian area with miles of riding trails, equine exercise and exhibition rings and hundreds of stables. To plunk down a development consisting of low income housing into this unique enclave seems like a poorly conceived joke designed to heighten social rancor and raise one important question: Is there no other area in Huntington Beach for a social engineering project like this at a more affordable price? More important, there is a massive safety issue to consider. Our community was designed decades ago with horse trails that substitute for sidewalks. This means that children walking to school do not have curbs as protective barriers from passing cars. This situation invites disaster and poses i enormous liability to the city in case of an accident. Does it seem logical that foot traffic should be increased in this area by building more housing? I strongly urge The City to move this project to a different location in Huntington Beach where it will better balance and complement the adjacent community and possibly find a more supportive and safer infrastructure. Please uphold the promises made in our city's Master Plan and honor the promises made decades ago to Huntington Beach homeowners and citizens. Sincere regards, Terry & Penny Nelson 6921 Derby Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 10:42 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Proposed building site Original Message From:janet hermer<janethermer@msn.com> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 3:41 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed building site Hello, I live in Greystone Keys and agree with the proposals set forth in the letter to which I am responding. Unfortunately I am out of the area on the dates of the meetings and so am unable to attend. Thank you, Janet Hermer Sent from my iPad SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION flee Dab:_ Q RR?" Agenda nemNo.: 1( (aa -clap Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 4:18 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION taming DMs:_►S l am.___ From: Diane Song<DMSONG@msn.com> SS4!/ /�a ,�0� Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 3:57 PM snds 1�'� _I (` To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Diane Song<dmsong@msn.com> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac. The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest (lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac, which would irreparably change the character of our community. At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts. Why were no parcels in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element to "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners, we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & i Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Diane Song Ashford/dmsong(6 msn.com DS • Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 6:22 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Overlay From: Frank<frankkomin@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 5:18 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:Sharon Komin <sharonkomin@gmail.com> Subject: Opposition to the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Overlay Mayor Delgleize, Council members Bolton, Carr, Kalmick, Moser, Peterson and Posey, My name is Frank Komin and I am a 25 year resident of the Edwards Hill quarter section. I would like to formally express my dissatisfaction with the proposed Ellis-Goldenwest Specific Plan as included in the High Density Housing Rezoning Overlay- ZTA 22-006. Likewise, I would like to express my dissatisfaction with the Holly Seacliff Specific Plan contained in the same overarching Rezoning Overlay. As such, I am urging each of you to disapprove these proposals for numerous reasons, including the following: • Each of these areas was never designed to accommodate high density housing. The existing infrastructure, including schools, traffic,parking, police, fire and medical services are clearly insufficient to support the flood of new residents into these neighborhoods. • My wife and I were diligent in evaluating all aspects of this area when we originally purchased our home and relied heavily on the Specific Plan that established clear guidelines for new construction and equestrian standards. This plan was re-approved numerous times by the City council. To suddenly change this feels like a breach of good faith, at a minimum. • As part of California State law and CEQA,there was clearly not an adequate EIR process performed that sufficiently informed the public of the project environmental impacts. The legislative intent of CEQA to "look before you leap" was never sufficiently accomplished in this case. • We never received any notification that this project was even being contemplated until we were notified by word of mouth from our neighbors. • The addition of the new streets needed to support the new housing project will create traffic congestion and introduce a variety of significant safety concerns. I am hopeful that simply removing these two areas from the City's proposal would both satisfy California State guidance and avoid the potential for any unnecessary litigation at the same time. Again, I am urging your support to disapprove both the Ellis-Goldenwest and Holly Seacliff high density rezoning proposal. Frank Komin SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Data: kl\ \a)9•eN 1Ailertil NOM No.; W (9a1cxo) Moore, Tania From: Kenneth Inouye <ken@kennethinouye.com> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 9:39 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: support of Huntington Beach's housing element October 31, 2022 Dear Honorable members of the Huntington Beach City Council: I am a resident of Huntington Beach and I support the implementation of a City wide housing plan which will provide for much needed housing while at the same time preserve the quality of life for the current residents of Huntington Beach. Respectfully, Kenneth K. Inouye 19321 Worchester Lane Huntington Beach, CA. 92646 Sent from Mail for Windows SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Date:mooing III I /cO?- 1 Agenda item No.; 4.4 (aa - 9a_a) Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:08 AM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: SeaGate Housing Element Attachments: Letter - Seagate Housing Element.pdf From:Allen Gomez<allengomez@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 6:34 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:SeaGate Housing Element Mayor Delgleize and City Council members, We would like to see the following in the Housing Element. a. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) b. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) c. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. d. No more than 3 story buildings in the HSSP area. e. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. f. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Allen Gomez SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: 1 I \ i Nis item No.; L{ (�� ' ge(0 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure B-10:Site Inventory -, .+atace PA*" •_, , ', Ili. b ' % -0,1* .., . 4,, - 44 .74/ -,/, N 4„ tot �IIIIIion 393 v t 4. 1IIIIIIIIIII 395 1394�tw+i► !•, , +4 IUIIIIII 398 —._— 240 -1` is •nd , II"MI 396 239® ' . L•.. 9 ,��� "MI 397 :246 245 249 ,� IIr. City Boundary 1 i,p_':tic".t4 16025:3113_:2 ---_1_1,21:SitesEC Inventory „, 121242i122. 1 - • i 137ams t* 110 ..a._ 8,4131'_ 4.- 1 286 :z g , �-254 '"` 395—''__" 3874 ��., oe "`- ,� 386 ..[ .- 1 1 388 r P' �' ~sivins ,391' 'S - .,,, to f f i ♦ r Ph y 39Q x. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Street Name Only/Email: Signature/Initials: Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:08 AM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Fikes, Cathy Subject: FW: Seagate Community Issue Attachments: SC308_Sales22103114430.pdf From: Brandon Wishengrad <bwishengrad@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,October 31, 2022 1:11 PM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Seagate Community Issue Please see attached. Thank you, Brandon Wishengrad SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION 'Meeting Date: 1 e Ager Item No.: SOLI (aa-citeo) October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council(City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO.22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed"Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP)with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beech 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 8-10:Site Inventory ts:!.17 IX/I& t eft ' ; re '1"` c$13 mat*road* Legend F - - Ea.! II City Boundary .att `y • Si" - Sites Inventory - n-;. v . ,,, ED- I� 24:., + 127 18 Al 1,-, . ~' 137 8312 11 G S31 231 125 16.1 38 - a '' .�286 2$4 t` 39 386 } 388 Orr 4110 �*� 3•1 � 3 TBr. We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac)anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest(lots 393 &394)a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393&394(northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association,Huntington Beach Name: SLth ra�l Street Name Only/Email: /152 c Zn 6v,.r.41-tr..i.r j e ,Ca r-- � . J Signature/Initials: C ` , ,r Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:09 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: Opposition to Bella Terra 7 story and Brindle Build Original Message From: Dennis Pappas<ndoceanpappas@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 7:56 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Dennis Pappas<ndoceanpappas@gmail.com> Subject: Opposition to Bella Terra 7 story and Brindle Build Dear Huntington Beach City Council, Please consider delaying the vote on these two developments; Bella Terra 7 Story-Burlington Coat Factory and the Brindle Property. We have not had enough public input nor do we have the infrastructure to support these builds. This can be a project or project for the new city council to deliberate. Respectfully, Thank you, Patricia Pappas SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Wang Date: El ( Pc) - Ages I No.; �s �( (aa- Moore, Tania From: MONICA SEHNERT <mmsehnert@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:07 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Burlington Coat Factory and Brindle Property Dear Huntington Beach City Council, Please consider delaying the vote on these two properties; Burlington Coat Factory and Brindle Property till after the new city council has been established for the upcoming year. Our infrastructure is already strained and I fear this will overburden the existing one.Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Respectfully, Monica Sehnert Sent from my iPad SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICAllON MeOM bale: till 190? l A Item No.:, SS I (�a - 'LI" Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:30 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:Agenda Item No. 22-906! Housing Element From:Courtney McClellan<courtney.mcclellan@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:23 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc:Courtney McClellan<courtney.mcclellan@gmail.com> Subject:Agenda Item No. 22-906! Housing Element SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Wang Agenda Morn No.. 471 (aa-9000) 1 0.) .„ _.-- rZ 4.,J = g4. ) OZJ = U = 4.-J oti) M . ...4 CA (1) Cu) (i) = C4 Ct CU w o 7:::$ a�i taD VID C) P/C • pommel = C . oila C = C ci)O x-' cl) w � � O = = . 1 r,, (1) • ._ , Nr4 ci, ,u= = cnopo„ ,,, 44 = u • ....4 )h_14 .4..,) ;m.4 al to Ca) ei-4 CO 0 Cl) Z 7:::$ , °-4 = U (ZCI ' cn � •re ' rig +-+ 3 tSwati ai) cu 'u 0 Ceso) V Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:13 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Attachments: Letter- Seagate Housing Element - list.pdf From: Carrie Lines<carriealines@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:57 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Please see attached letter from 5 homeowners in Seagate (emails included in letter). Andrew Kwan Janai Kwan Thong Dinh Carolyn Lewis John W. Lewis Thank you. Carrie Lines Homeowner at Rockridge Drive, HB carriealines@gmail.com SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION tat3ting : i ) 1 ► 1 oaa Agenda non,too: #,y a ceo 1 October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT:AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element (November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach,we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element" and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 8-10:Site Inventory its f l tiri ti, ' q,-. -a it �y ,�.y lit t{ .� it Imo 393 ' / ; 'A fiiviiiiiiu 395 394 �- + �S ► �IMlilill 398 El 240 - ' 7, • IIIIil1U s' °' 396 - 1. '- Legend wt.�r'; ;iiiiniI 397 _*" ''' . . I City Boundary i " 246 ® 249. . 250 302 ,111 --- O Sites Inventory 339,-448 i*s M '".' 121 .t -..""'248 247 122 trifric127 �' t 182 ' `sirs*Jeicr 129w .- " '137 . 126 . . 231' 161 «. . ` 125.160 ^+" 38;4131' F^2 _ "' 254 86 +_ T LA' ' , 5 -� " . � ' ‘ `- ,t13 86 . *Wit , ts 391 '`\v. 3 38- 8� rr g08. . We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre (du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest&Ernest (lots 393 &394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current"Housing Element"shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density,projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts),which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? We believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing Element "maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP.We are alarmed that such a high density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,we want the following 6 measures in the Housing Element. 1. No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 2. No more than 2 story buildings in lots 393 &394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest) 3. No greater density than the 25 du/ac HSSP area. 4. No more than 3 story buildings HSSP area. 5. No roof decks or balconies that face Ernest Drive and within 100 feet of Ernest Drive. 6. Continue to not allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge City Council to vote for an option that lowers allowable densities in this part of the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6 measures into the Housing Element to achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersigned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: SEE ATTACHED LIST Street Name Only/Email: SEE ATTACHED LIST Signature/Initials: SEE ATTACHED LIST f +' rty:; t ,, P 141141/4..N. - S 1 cc ,, , N bill, 2 "\ 0 t7 v \Y til s)kvi \ Q1 cJ ` t _c ko � � a C) r 3 U ,` T ': N G -7 (p N 0 : G ____ csi ri `�`Ji v {� ���\} N V .O t V `C N..`r a �`] > e U ' ,N � ' E 1/1 . (>o CA �_ � � � � 'A � % i o N ,.1 0 '. .).. z Wj •� (11 l ku � tit.. ,)4. , Q 6. ri z S Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:13 AM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: HDD! Importance: High From: Gary Tarkington <garytarkington@msn.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 9:57 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: HDD! Importance: High ABSOLUTELY NO MORE HDD in Huntington Beach! We don't need it, and there are not enough resources to support it!! Ann Tarkington Huntington Beach SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Mee<ting Date: II I 1 I g02-9 garma iam No.; S O4 ( -ga.p J 1 tt Switzer, Donna From: delaine.bailey.1791@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:17 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Oppose Approval of Bella Terra 7-Story Building / Burlington Coat Factory & Brindle- Thomas Overlay Dear Huntington Beach City Council, Please consider delaying the vote on these two developments; Bella Terra 7 Story-Burlington Coat Factory and the Brindle Property. We have not had enough public input nor do we have the infrastructure to support these builds. This can be a project or project for the new city council to deliberate. Respectfully, Delaine Bailey SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Atietitng Date:�. . .li 1 ► \a.)a — Agnnda Item 14o. z4J ;- .p 1 Switzer, Donna From: delaine.bailey.1791@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:17 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Oppose Approval of Bella Terra 7-Story Building / Burlington Coat Factory & Brindle- Thomas Overlay Dear Huntington Beach City Council, Please consider delaying the vote on these two developments; Bella Terra 7 Story-Burlington Coat Factory and the Brindle Property. We have not had enough public input nor do we have the infrastructure to support these builds. This can be a project or project for the new city council to deliberate. Respectfully, Delaine Bailey SUPPLEMENTAL CO ; U !CATION ktieelv Date: :a I C 1 9-0a'.9% ygerra;tern .: `/ ( :9 ) Moore, Tania From: Keith Dean <k.dean11 @me.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:33 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) Attachments: The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP).pdf To: Huntington Beach City Council: Response letter attached with regards to the The Holly-Seadiff Specific Plan (HSSP). Keith Dean 714.747.8980-cell K.Dean11@me.com SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Date:Meeling III 120 9' - Agenda Item No.. a34. October 28, 2022 TO: Huntington Beach City Council (City.Council@surfcity-hb.org) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. 22-906 Housing Element(November 1, 2022 City Council Meeting) Dear Honorable Mayor Delgleize and members of the City Council, As homeowners of Seagate Community Association in Huntington Beach, we are OUTRAGED and AGAINST any plans to adopt the proposed "Housing Element"and the proposed high density housing in the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) with a 70 du/ac density: City of Huntington Beach 2021-2029 Housing Element DRAFT Figure 0-10:Site Inventory jr * 4tilt Nif 14#04 Alk,. .4"7„ * '44t" ,4/0 4 " -114,fe ,406, %AMU!"NJ 0514 * 4. 3 ix) .Z.,-;* 7,LT1 ik Legend tr.z. 111* 1'246 245 ' 249 II ticturscle 4 , 8 1211,,-.-,„ tO 27 !, 1 8 2 137 • -128 231 - •R; • ,110 12E, Low 25 ''3115 387 3 88 „-,•• A44, * • ',4•••;«,t 39C` -•" • k•- — We are dismayed to see that the draft proposal currently would allow for 70 du/ac.The Holly- Seacliff Specific Plan (HSSP) calls for the development of residences at a maximum density of no more than 25 dwelling units/acre(du/ac) anywhere in the plan and for the specific area on the northeast corner of Goldenwest& Ernest(lots 393 & 394) a maximum density of no more than 7 du/ac. The current "Housing Element" shows a 70 du/ac,which would irreparably change the character of our community.At that density, projects would likely be four to five stories in height (or at least include five story elements such as stairwells and elevator shafts), which would be entirely out of scale with surrounding developments. The selected sites are not geographically dispersed within the City of Huntington Beach. Holly Seacliff and Ernest/Goldenwest specific plans are being impacted unfairly compared to other predominantly single-family neighborhood tracts.Why were no parcels identified in the entire North West or South East quadrants of Huntington Beach identified? VVe believe the stated number one housing goal per the Huntington Beach Housing E|uonuot ..maintain and enhance the quality and affordability of existing housing in Huntington Beach" cannot be achieved if the city council votes to increase the allowable density to 70 du/ac in the HSSP. YVe are alarmed that such ahigh density would be considered in this area. As homeowners,xwe want the following 6 measures kn the Housing Element. I, No greater density than 7 du/ac in lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner of Goldenwest & Ernest) 2, No more than Z story buildings io lots 393 & 394 (northeast corner o[Coldeuvvesl/� Ernest) I No greater density than the Z5du/acHS3Parea. 4. Nunnurcthan 3 story buildings HS3Parea. 5� Nun/o|dccksnr balconies that face Ernest Drive and within l00 feet ofErnestDrive. 6. Continue tu riot allow overnight parking on Ernest Drive. We urge Citv Council to vote tor an option that lowers allowable densities in this part o�the city. We urge the City Council to incorporate these 6rucaoures into Lho Housing Element k/ achieve that number one housing goal for Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Undersi-ned homeowners of Seagate Community Association, Huntington Beach Name: Street Name 0nly/Eruai|: ^,f� ��,��. ,.. Signature/Initials: /r>f �, .- Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 12:12 PM To: Agenda Alerts Subject: FW: HDD Original Message From:Jeanne Paris<jeannemarieparis@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 11:36 AM To: CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: HDD To the City Council, Please reconsider all HDD approvals. Clearly the people of this beautiful city have made their opinions very clear. There appears that this mandate from Sacramento may have been faulty. We do not have the infrastructure to move forward with these unwanted plans. Jeanne Paris Sent from my iPhone SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION meeting Date: tI1 , Ia0a Apes itorn W.; SS71414 (ga - 9069 4- Switzer, Donna From: karen vogtmann <kvogtmann@me.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 1:54 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org = � Subject: Bella Terra 7 story coat factory structure And Brindle Development Dear Huntington Beach City Council, My husband and I just recently heard about these proposed developments.We would like to know much more before you take a vote.We would like the opportunity to hear the proposal and we would like to hear what our community thinks.We live near Bella Terra and already notice the impact on the infrastructure in our area. Energy,water,traffic, parking. We have been citizens of Huntington Beach since 1966, please let us hear and discuss the proposals. Thank you, Karen Vogtmann Sent from my iPad 1 Switzer, Donna From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 1:58 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org -''����"' Subject: FW: Opposition to Bella Terra seven story and Brindle high density Original Message From: Dennis Pappas<ndoceanpappas@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 1:56 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Opposition to Bella Terra seven story and Brindle high density Dear City Council Members, Please delay any approval voting of the Bella Terra seven story and Brindle project. We already have traffic issues at Bella Terra and enough housing in this property and another at Gothard & Edinger. Our current infrastructure has water shortages and blackouts Common sense dictates not to move forward at this time This is not good for the look of our beach community or for the citizens you represent. Thank You Sent from my iPhone 1 Switzer, Donna From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:02 PM To: agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Bella Terra-Vote No to more congestion Original Message From: Carrie Wood <mscarriewood@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:01 PM To:CITY COUNCIL<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Bella Terra-Vote No to more congestion Dear Huntington Beach City Council, PI a ing the vote on these two developments; Bella Terra 7 Story-Burlington Coat Factory and the rindle Property. W ave not had enough public input nor do we have the infrastructure to support these builds. This space canThe used to better serve the Huntington Beach community. Respectfully, Thank you, David and Carrie Wood 1