HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council - 2023-49 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CONCERNING
THE MEASURE M2 EXPENDITURE REPORT
FOR THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
WHEREAS, local jurisdictions are required to meet eligibility requirements and submit
eligibility verification packages to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to
remain eligible to receive M2 funds.
Local jurisdictions are required to adopt an annual M2 Expenditure Report as part of one
of the eligibility requirements.
Local jurisdictions are required to account for Net Revenues, developer/traffic impact
fees, and funds expanded by local jurisdiction in the M2 Expenditure Report that satisfy the
Maintenance of Effort requirements; and
The M2 Expenditure Report shall include all Net Revenue fund balances, interest earned
and expenditures identified by type and program or project; and
The M2 Expenditure Report must be adopted and submitted to the OCTA each year
within six months of the end of the local jurisdiction's fiscal year to be eligible to receive Net
Revenues as part of M2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach does hereby inform OCTA that:
a) The M2 Expenditure Report is in conformance with the template provided in the
Measure M2 Eligibility Guidelines and accounts for Net Revenues included interest
earned, expenditures during the fiscal year and balances at the end of fiscal year.
b) The M2 Expenditure Report is hereby adopted by the City of Huntington Beach.
c) The City of Huntington Beach Finance Director is hereby authorized to sign and
submit the M2 Expenditure Report to OCTA for the fiscal year ending 2023.
23-13528/320493 1
Resolution No. 2023-49
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of November , 2023.
I 'f'*7 w,OED
Mayor
REVIEWED AND PPRO APPROVED AS TO F RM:
City Manager Cit Attorney
INITIATED AND APPROVED:
Director of Public Works
22-12065/294662 2
City of Huntington Beach Signature Page
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
I hereby certify that:
I�AII the information attached herein and Included in schedules 1 through 4 is true and accurate to the best of
my knowledge;
IZThe interest earned'on Net Revenues allocated pursuant to the Ordinance shall be expended only for those
purposes for which the Net Revenues were allocated;
C3"The City/County of Huntington Beach is aware of the State Controller's"Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax
Expenditures for Cities and Counties",which is a guide for determining MOE Expenditures for M2 Eligibility
purposes;
EiThe City/County's Expenditure Report is In compliance with direction provided in the State Controller's
"Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Cities and Counties;"and
El The City/County of Huntington Beach has expended in this fiscal year an amount of local discretionary
funds for streets and roads purposes at least equal to or exceeding the FY 2022-23 MOE benchmark dollar
amount11
• . Sunny Han it/S ?-�
Chief Financial Officer(Print Name) Date
• I
Signature
11 Jurisdictions are encouraged to submit MOE eligible expenditures higher than their MOE benchmark, so that
should certain expenses be ruled ineligible during an MOE audit, the local Jurisdiction still has sufficient MOE
expenditures to demonstrate continued achievement of the MOE benchmark.
City of Huntington Beach Schedule 1
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Beginning and Ending Balances
Description Line Amount Interest
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year r• v_ _ .-_;fiA ;5 :;X '_=.
A-M Freeway Projects 1 $ - $ -
O Regional Capacity Program(RCP) 2 . $ . (89,351) $ . .. . .. ... ........147
P Regional.Traffic Signal Synchronization Program(RTSSP) 3 $ - $ -
Q Local Fair Share 4 $ 3,195,140 $ -
R .High Frequency Metrolink Service -_ . 5 $ - $
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink^ . - 6 $ - $ -
Convert Metrolink Station(s)to Regional Gateways that
T connect Orange Count with Hi h-S eed Rail Systems 7 $ - $
—
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical
U Pram 8 $ 115,543 $ -
✓ Community Based Transit/Circulators 9 $ (49,891) $ - -
W Safe Transit Stops• _ 10. $ - $ -
X Environmental Cleanup Program(Water Quality) 11 $ - 330,527 $ 847
Other* . . 12. $ -
Balances at Beginning of Fiscal Year 13 $ 3,501,968 $ 994
(Monies Made Available During Fiscal Year 14 $ 4,901,379 $ 59,482
Total Monies Available(Sum Lines 13&14) 15 $ 8,403,347 $ 60,476
Expenditures During Fiscal Year 16 $ • . 4,099,587 $ 59,482
Balances at End of Fiscal Year ,. ... _n. ,_ ° -
A-M Freeway Projects 17 _
O Regional Capacity Program(RCP) 18 $ (89,351) $ 147 .
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program(RTSSP) -m 19
Q • Local Fair Share - 20 $ 3,928,309
R High Frequency Metrolink Service 21 #
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink _ _ 22
T Convert Metrolink Station(s)to Regional Gateways that 23
connect Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems
Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical
24 .$ 184,166,
Program . ,• • .
✓ Community Based Transit/Circulators 25 •
W Safe Transit Stops
X Environmental Cleanup Program(Water Quality) • ___ • 27 $ 330,527 $ 847
Other* 28 $ -
*Please provide a specific description
Please note on the beginning balance of Local Fair Share we have added$7,034 from the 'Other"ending balance
from FY 21-22,As noted on the 21-22 report this was a transfer from other funds to reconcile payments miscoded to M2.
}
. I
1
• s City of Huntington Beach M2 Expenditure Report Schedule 2
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023
Sources and Uses.
Description Line Amount Interest
No.
Revenues: ,..-v:.,,7,-.. .,,r,,,,-;-,-,..,,, ,,,,-.7.. .-.:__-,` ,„.1w-h-114,,,,-;,:•--,-,,i,•,,
---4.2,,,,,_-...,:1,-..,,,,:,,-2-2,.t.:..-.---4,-e,,,:-. •-...-34-:•_-,,..3.,.-,:,:r...4,z,--.7..,-,-.=..-,..,
A-M Freeway Projects • 1 $ - $
O Regional Capacity Program(RCP) 2 $ . - $ -
,..._..., _...____ . .. . .
P Regional Traffic Sinai Synchronization:Program(RTSSP) 3 $ •
. ...—_,..
Q Local Fair Share 4 $ 4,565,132 $ 57,31-4-
•R High Frequency Metrolink Service 5 $ - $
• S Transit Extensions to Metrolink 6 $ - $ -
Convert Metrolink Station(s)to Regional Gateways that connect
T 7 $ - $
Orange.County with High-Speed Rail Systems ....
U Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program 8 $ 336,247 $ 2,168
✓ Community Based Transit/Circulators 9 $ - $ -.
• W Safe Transit Stops 10 $ - $ -
•.. . .
X Environmental Cieanu Program(Water Quality) 11 $ - $ -
Other* 12 $ - $ -,
TOTAL REVENUES(Sum lines 1 to 12) 13 $ 4,901,379 $ 59,482 -
Expenditures: Ta-:-.4a-;-%S,:--i•s-,::'''?•-- -;.': .•:',-il,?-'-'-f:1::'-', .'LL:-
• —
A-M Freeway ProkaL__ 14 $ - $
O Regional Capacity Program(RCP)
P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program(RTSSP.) 16 $ - $ -
Q Local Fair Share _ _ 17 $ 3,831,963 $ 57,314
R High Frequency Metrollnk Service 18 $ - $
S Transit Extensions to Metrolink - 19 $
Convert Metrolink Station(s)to Regional Gateways that connect
T 20 $ - $ -
Orange County with High-Speed Rail Systems
U Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program 21 $ 267,624 $ 2,168
• V Community Based Transit/Circulators 22 $ - $ -
W Safe Transit Stops 23 $ - $ -
X Environmental Cleanup Program(Water quality). . 24 $ . .. - $ . . -
-...-.. .....
•
Other* 25 $ - $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES(Sum lines 14 to 25) 26 $ 4,099,587 $ 59,482
TOTAL BALANCE(Subtract line 26 from 13) • 27 • $ .801,792 $ -
*Please provide a specific description
. .
City of Huntington Beach Schedule 3
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2023 -
Streets and Roads Detailed Use of Funds.
tine Developer/. O
P Q X Other Other
Type of Expenditure MOE 0 P Q X'_ in Other* TOTAL
No. ImDactFeee interest Interest Interest Interest me Interest
I 1
indirect and/or Overhead . . 1 $ .2,931,485 S - - $" . - $ .- $ - .$ - 5 8,672 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ' 1,155,773 5 - 4,095,930
Construction
__._.._&Right-of-Way.�.- - ,. rY r _I,-'.- •. .. ' MEW - : 1' rr • a`7,• r`�. r �r ;1.., .,c�'l .,.�s,..t� �r: � , t n � ? , ., ,i,'rvc;: L .. rs, �.r, r a.',''.,,,,. i 4.
New Street Construction 2 $ •• $ - $ - $ - $ 5 $ - $
Street Reconstruction 3 5 _323,771 .$ - $ - $ - - $ - S - $ 576,147 $ _ - $ - $ - $ - $ .- $ 260,953 $ 1,166,821
Signals,Safety Devices,&'Streetlights - 4 .5 217,244 $ 46,849 $ .-� - $ $ •^-^- $ - $_ - $ Y -$ - $ - $ - - $ ^ - - S - 843,340 $ -1,107,434
PedestrianWays&Bflmpaths w 5 $ 30a,840 $ - - $ - $ $ ^-• • - S - $ 318,829 $ _-_$_ _- $ - $ $ ^-.-$ 66.5 623,735
-'---stormOralns s $
$
S $__ $
_ $ - $ $ - s 5. _-$--.,.-.._5 -, S__._,_.._,_,.,-S,__.--.-,
Storm Damage 7 $ - S - - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5. - $ - $ $ - 5
Total Consi:1=60 ' 8 $ 851,805 $ 46,849 $ - $ S. - $ - $ 894,976 $ _ _- $__ - _$ - $_ - $ - $ 1,104,360 $ 2,897,990
_____ - —r ' W- $ �^ • $ - $ • -- S $ $ ^ - $ 5�r� $ —,�- $ ^^^--$— $ ~
R Way 9 $ -5 - '
Total Construction&Right-of-Way 10 $ 851,805 $ 46,849 $ n - $ - $ - $ - $ 694,976 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1„104,360 $ 2,897,990
Maintenance r'I,zx,a, 4 ''aJ;_1 r Y ,isrr -1 :i i x..r red ,Ly r t- a I .. a r r.1,} r<lrr f7r r ,,, ! 1 :.� y yidtihij Tt r .1D tie rr. , 5.,,,ph, yt:,,x
t # .M1=`t . ., I TI t.. °q i.,14r m'a , _ •51. , ,, ref.., t,c , . � . .. ....
Patching 11 $ 230,952 $ _ - $ - $ - $ t- $t - $. - $. - $ - S - 1$ - $ - $___- $ 230,5_2
Overlay&Sealing 32 $Y 405,702 $ ._._.. -._$.�_.._._._.-—_._. ..._.$_�.�__:$ --- - $ 1,086,670 .$._,.,_-.....--$-,- - -$,.�.�_.-$._... -$._._-..-,_.-,$ 1,700,863 $ 3,193,233-
_.^Streetlights&Traffic Signals...-..-.-..----- -.33-$ 1.183506 $ .«„-...5.-,_.-._.-,,...$_..,�._"$_- $__. _ $ $.-_, ,..$-.r=$
- $.,._,_.-.--..$.. _-,-_,-.-5.-- 560,976$�-1,744,883
Storm Damage 14 S - $ - S .- $ -$ - S $ - $ $. - S - $ $ - S - $ • -
Other Street Purpose Maintenance 15 $ 6,676,533 $- - $ $ - $. - $ - $'1,841,645 $ 57,314 $ - $ - $ -. $ - _$ - $ 8,575.493
Total Maintenance'- 16 $ 8,497,094 $ - $ -_S • $ - $ - $ 2,928,375 $ 57,314 $ - $ - $ $ ' - $ 2,261,839 $ 13,744,563
Other^— ------ -'-17 t,i '.`„`"', T..;. '$$ $ �- $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -_$ 267,624 $ 2,168 $ $ 269,792
GRANDTOTALS(Sum unes1,10,16,17) 18 $ 12,280,384 $ 46,849 $ - - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,831,963 $ 57,314 $ - $ - $ 267,624 $ 2,168 5 4,27,972 $ 21,008,274
Any California State Constitution Article XlX streets and road eligible expenditure may be'counted"In localJurisdiedons'calculation of MOE If the activity is supported(funded)by a local jurisdictions'discretionary funds(e.g.general
fund).The California State Controller also provides useful information on Article XiXand the Streets and Highways Code eligible expenditures in Its'Guidelines Relating to Gas Tax Expenditures for Gees and Counties".I have reviewed
Finance Director Confirmation 19 and am aware of these guidelines and their applicability In calculating and reporting on Maintenance of Effort expenditures_
Finance Director initial:A7—
1 Includes direct charges forstaftime - Legend . . .
=Other MZ includes A-M,RS,T,V,V,and W � :o:,PmJeet•i::DescrlDt+epr"'r' e-�^pia'::i.':;:::::c:..:c::;c;s:r::"::::v;:-:::°:.:f`;:r:::r,.:;.....,
- +Transportation related only A•M Freeway Projects
•Please provide a specific description - I 0 Regional Capacity Program(RCP)
, otherexpenditune herds are gas tax,prop 42and RMRA - P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program(RiSSP)
a LocalFairShare
R High Frequency Metrolink Service
. . _ $ - Transit ExtensionstoMetrolink
T Convert Metrolink Statlon(s)to Regional Gateways that connect Orange County with
High•Speed Rail Systems
U Senior Mobility Program or Senior Non-Emergency Medical Program
✓ Community Based Transit/Cawlators
W Safe Transit Stops
X Environmental Cleanup Program(Water Quality)
City of Huntington Beach Schedule 4
M2 Expenditure Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,2023
Local Fair Share Project List
PROJECT NAME AMOUNT EXPENDED
General Street Maintenance $ 1,907,631
Residential Pavement $ •1,086,670
Pedestrian Improvement . $ 318,829 -
Arterial Rehabilitation $ 576,147
1
}
i
}
_ - I
}
}
$ 3,889,277
•
•
Res. No. 2023-49
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ' ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted
by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a Regular meeting thereof held on November 21, 2023 by the following vote:
AYES: Kalmick, Moser, Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon, Bolton, Burns
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RECUSE: None
(4) 'i 1. i' .
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the City_of
Huntington Beach, California