Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFlowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC - 2025-02-18 (2) 2000 Main Street, 4¢°tt5, Nct°�r Huntington Beach,CA. P�fr 9; 92648 P` .e =® Cityof Huntington Beach _., _ 9 APPROVED 7-0 File#: 25-017 MEETING DATE: 2/18/2025 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Travis Hopkins, Acting City Manager PREPARED BY: Ashley Wysocki, Director of Community & Library Services Subject: Approve and authorize the execution of a License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC, for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers at Huntington Central Park East located at 18381 Goldenwest Street. Statement of Issue: The City Council is asked to approve a License Agreement, between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC, for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers in a portion of Huntington Central Park East. Financial Impact: The City will receive a one-time license fee of$15,000 and will receive a portion of event revenue from various fees, including tickets, food and beverage sales, and sponsorships. Additionally, the City will receive 60% of parking fees collected in the reserved parking areas, which will be used for capital improvement projects benefiting the Huntington Central Park and the Huntington Beach Central Library, including the restoration of the library fountains and park irrigation systems. The City is guaranteed a minimum annual revenue of$150,000. Recommended Action: A) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a License Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC, for the management and operation of Symphony of Flowers at Huntington Central Park East; and, B) Approve Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report (FMEIR) for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California - Symphony of Flowers Project (Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007) as adequate and complete in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements. Alternative Action(s): Do not approve the recommended action and direct staff accordingly: Analysis: City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 5 Printed on 2/13/2025 powered by LegistarT" 451 File#: 25-017 MEETING DATE: 2/18/2025 On October 15, 2024, the City Council directed staff to work with the Symphony of Flowers operator on the feasibility of an agreement to debut the Symphony of Flowers (Symphony) event in Huntington Beach. This unique opportunity fulfills the City Council's Strategic Plan goal to explore additional sports and event venues throughout the City, which aims to enhance the cultural and recreational offerings available to residents and visitors. By bringing new and diverse events to Huntington Beach, the City can enrich the community experience and support local tourism and business growth. Additionally, this opportunity aligns with the City's commitment to exploring new revenue generation opportunities as a means to reinvest back into our community. Through strategic partnerships and events like the Symphony of Flowers, the City can generate additional funds that will be used to improve infrastructure, support public services, and enhance the overall quality of life for residents. Staff identified the area in Huntington Central Park East known as the Central Park campground as an ideal location. The campground within Huntington Central Park East provides a space with minimal impact to overall park use compared to other sites within Huntington Central Park. It also serves to be a successful location for popular annual events, making it an ideal location for a multi- month installation. After several site meetings, the Event Operator confirmed their desire to operate in Huntington Central Park and entered into contract negotiations with the City. The Symphony is a completely new form of interactive, immersive entertainment, created by • Normand Latourelle. Mr. Latourelle is the co-founder of Cirque de Soleil and the creator and artistic director of two touring shows, Cavalia and Odysseo, which are two of the largest productions of their kind in the world. Symphony completed a successful opening run in Montreal, Canada, in the early Fall of 2023, and is seeking to debut the show for the first time in the United States in Huntington Central Park East. Symphony features over 100,000 luminous flowers and over 500,000 low-emitting LED lights that are choreographed to captivating classical music. Up to 2,000 spectators will begin the experience in bleacher seating, where the audience can enjoy the flowers coming to life with an elevated view of the field. Following the conclusion of the 30-minute show, spectators are invited for a walk along the pathways within the fields of flowers, providing an immersive experience and allowing the audience to engage with the installation at their own pace. City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 2/13/2025 powered by Legistari"' 452 File#: 25-017 MEETING DATE: 2/18/2025 Contract Term & Fees Below is a summary of key terms and conditions of the proposed agreement: Year 1 Year 2-3 Per-ticket Revenue $3 per ticket $5 per ticket Parking Revenue 60% City/40% Event. City to Same as year 1 provide parking attendant staffing Sponsorship Revenue 0% City to receive 20% sponsorships Food and Beverage Revenue 0% City to receive 20% net profits Special Benefits City to receive revenue from 5 Same as year 1 mutually agreeable days of off-peak (Monday-Thursday) performances. Event to receive Food and Beverage revenue during the 5- days to help offset the performance costs. Restoration Fees SOF to provide restoration fee of Same as year 1 $50,000 annually for turf and landscaping Community Benefit Symphony understands how significant Huntington Central Park is to residents and visitors and has a desire to give back to the community during the term of the event. Symphony's footprint will not inhibit accessibility around Huntington Central Park for daily users. Symphony will provide one thousand (1,000) event tickets directly to local, Huntington Beach based charities each year. Contract Details Below is a summary of key terms and conditions of the proposed agreement: Symphony Obligations: • Shall operate all sales of tickets, concessions, merchandise, and other products related to event operation • Shall operate all media and sponsorship events • Shall secure all required City and County permits, at their own cost • Shall follow all City of Huntington Beach Municipal Codes and Specific Event rules and regulations • Shall professionally operate the property at all times • Shall conduct routine maintenance and inspections as needed and make every attempt to keep noise level at a minimum during maintenance and inspections • Shall be responsible for all costs associated with materials necessary to make the event premise suitable for the event • Shall restore the event premises to its condition as existed before the event or any event activities City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 2/13/2025 powered by Legistarn" 453 File#: 25-017 MEETING DATE: 2/18/2025 • Shall be responsible for all costs and expenses to repair and/or replace any equipment, facilities, or property damaged • Shall provide immediate removal of trash and debris from the event or any event activities • Shall secure an account, separately meter, and be responsible for the cost of all utilities and materials • Shall provide 1,000 event tickets directly to local, Huntington Beach based charities each year, and promote and host a special library event that will offer discounted ticket sales • Shall pay for the cost of any necessary environmental review as required by law and as required by the City for this event • Shall provide a complimentary sponsorship package for the city, which includes a prominent space for City usage from which the City may promote the City at the event, signage at locations throughout the event, placement of the City's logo on all public event-related materials, and placement of City's logo and banner advertisements on all event websites • Shall provide a complimentary hospitality package that includes 400 complimentary VIP hospitality passes for the event per year for use by City's employees and representatives • Shall work collaboratively with the City to determine a restoration plan City Obligations: • Shall conduct a lottery for non-profit fundraising opportunities at an upcoming City Council meeting • Shall allow access to the property 24 hours per day, with the last show ending by 10:30 pm, from Friday through Sunday, and access for troubleshooting and repair/maintenance of the show • Shall assist with event marketing, including Citywide banner/pennant program, social media, and press releases • Shall provide access to Central Library, Parks Tree Landscape, and Marion Lot parking lots for event activation • Shall coordinate with Huntington Beach Sports Complex for collaborative use of the parking lot for shows from Monday through Thursday Environmental Status: An Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report (FMEIR) for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California (Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007) was prepared for the requested action. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq.), this Addendum to the EIR analyzes the Symphony of Flowers (Project/Show) and demonstrates the Symphony of Flowers does not meet the standards for a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code ,Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163. Although the Symphony of Flowers wasn't originally contemplated in the Certified 1999 FMEIR, the Project instead qualifies for use of an Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 as the Project would not result in any new significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts or introduce new mitigation measures. As demonstrated by the analysis in the Addendum, City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 2/13/2025 powered by Legistar" 454 File#: 25-017 MEETING DATE: 2/18/2025 the Symphony of Flowers would not result in any new significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts. Rather, all of the impacts associated with the Symphony of Flowers are within the envelope of impacts addressed in the Certified 1999 FMEIR and do not constitute new or substantially increased significant impacts. Therefore, the Symphony of Flowers does not meet the criteria for a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163. Strategic Plan Goal: Goal 6 - Infrastructure Investment,,Strategy B - Explore additional sports and concert venues to bolster tourism and provide world class amenities for community members. For details, visit www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/strategicplan. Attachment(s): 1. Draft License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment LLC 2. Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California - Symphony of Flowers Project (Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007) City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 2/13/2025 powered by Legistarn" 455 LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND FLOWERS OF THE SKY ENTERTAINMENT LLC THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT("Agreement") is made and entered into this 18th day of February , 2025 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation and charter city("City"), and Flowers of the Sky LLC,hereinafter referred to as "Licensee." City and Licensee are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a"Party"and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Licensee is the United States producer of the event titled Symphony of Flowers. Symphony of Flowers is an acclaimed outdoor multimedia show, path, and experience, featuring thousands of lights and special effects across a field of multimedia flowers and activities (the"Event"); and WHEREAS,Licensee plans to License, or use, occupy, and/or utilize the Event Premises for a period of months of each year of the Term. This period between the conclusion of the City's Civil War Reenactment and the American Revolutionary War Reenactment, or"season,"provides for setting up by Licensee of equipment,sets,or other objects on the Event Premises for the Events, a period of producing the Event for audiences, followed by time to take-down and removal of equipment, sets, or other objects from the Event Premises; and WHEREAS, City is owner of record of that certain real property located in the State of California, County of Orange, City of Huntington Beach commonly known as Huntington Central Park(the"Central Park"); and WHEREAS, it was the City that approached the Symphony of Flowers to come to the City. It is an event viewed by the City that would bring artistic value to the community and at the same time provide economic benefit to the City of Huntington Beach and the taxpayers; and WHEREAS, City recognizes the value of hosting the Symphony of Flowers for the enjoyment of its residents and the global community, the economic benefits brought to the City, and the showcasing of art, natural beauty, resources, enterprises, attractions, climate and parks of the City of Huntington Beach; and WHEREAS, Licensee desires and City agrees to allow Licensee certain rights to use a portion of the Central Park as shown on the drawing attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"A"(the"Event Premises"or"Licensed Premises")for the purpose of presenting the Event to the public as further described below(the"Licensed Use"); and WHEREAS, City desires to grant such License to Licensee on the terms and conditions set forth herein, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,the Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1 24-15263/357005 1. RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the same are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. DEFINITIONS. 2.1 "Branding"means the promotion of the Event by means of advertising and distinctive design, including but not limited to trademarks and copyrights associated with the Event. 2.2 "Business day"means a day on which City hall is open for business. 2.3 "Chapter 13.54"refers to Chapter 13.54 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and any amendments thereto. 2.4 "City Parking Spaces" refers to those public parking spaces located at the Event Premises which are available for public use and not already encumbered or reserved by a law enforcement agency (to provide law enforcement for the Event). 2.5 "Event Participant" or"Attendee" or"Patron"means a person,business or organization that performs,participates in(inclusive of Vendors), or is showcased in the Event. 2.6 "Food and/or Beverage Vendor" means a Vendor who prepares and sells, or simply sells, food and/or beverage to Event attendees. 2.7 "HBMC"means the municipal code of the City of Huntington Beach. 2.8 "Vendor" means all Event Participants, exhibitors and any other persons, businesses and organizations associated with the Event,who offer a product or item,for sale or for giveaway,to Event attendees, and/or engage in some form of promotion to Event attendees. 2.9 "Event" means the Symphony of Flowers outdoor multimedia show, path, and experience, featuring thousands of lights and special effects across a field of multimedia flowers and-activities. 2.10 "Event Premises" means that portion of the Central Park as shown on the drawing attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"A." 2.11 A "Ticket" is a coupon or certificate of admission to be sold, one to each person, for admission for attendance of an Event. 3. LICENSE. 3.1 Grant. City grants a license to Licensee to use the Event Premises, during the term provided for in Section 5, below, for the Licensee to manage and operate the Event, and for no other purpose, and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 3.2 Purpose. The purpose of the grant of this license is for both the use by Licensee of public property, for the purpose of managing and operating both the Event as well as specified activities related and incidental thereto, as well as the articulation of certain conditions, duties, obligations and benefits for Parties that are attendant to the grant of this license. 2 24-15263/357005 3.3 Disclaimer of Tenancy. Licensee is not a tenant or lessee of City and holds no rights of tenancy or leasehold in relation to the Event Premises.In consideration of City's grant of this license, Licensee specifically and expressly waives, releases, and relinquishes any and all rights to assert any claim of right,privilege or interest in the Event Premises other than the rights expressly granted by both this Agreement as well as an applicable Specific Events Permit. 3.4 Disclaimer of Liability. Licensee covenants, agrees and warrants that City is not liable for any loss, damages or injury to the person, or property of any person, whatsoever at any time, occasioned by or arising out of any act or omission of Licensee, or of anyone acting as the agent, employee, customer or representative of Licensee,pursuant to the uses, activities or occupancy provided for by both the license granted under this Agreement. 3.5 Disorderly Persons.Notwithstanding the license provided herein,City shall have the right to refuse entrance to the Event, or remove and eject from the Event, any person associated with the Event or present at the Event, whose conduct, in the reasonable judgment of the City, is objectionable, disorderly, disruptive or in violation of any law. The indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall apply to any claim or cause of action arising from such refusal or ejectment. 4. TERM The Term of this License is three (3) years, commencing on the Effective Date, and concluding exactly three years to the day from the Commencement Date(the"Term"). Although, as provided below,the Event occurs only six(6) months of each year. If mutually agreed by City and Licensee, an extension of one(1)year may be provided following the conclusion of the initial Term. No occupation prior to or after the Term will occur unless the Licensee has obtained the prior written consent of City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is understood that Licensee may begin surveying and site marking prior to the beginning of the Term at no additional cost to the Licensee. 5. USE OF EVENT PREMISES 5.1 SEASONAL: Although the Term of the License is measured in years, the Event may only take place in a series of months each year between the conclusion of the City's Civil War Reenactment and the beginning of the City's American Revolutionary War Reenactment (that span of months between, as "Season"). This Season is typically between the conclusion of Labor Day weekend and the beginning of the Month of March; although exact dates may vary. At all times, this License, the Licensee, and the timing of the Event is subject to, and dependent on, the timing of the conclusion of the City's Civil War Reenactment and the beginning of the City's American Revolutionary War Reenactment. As such, this License Agreement contemplates and provides for Licensee to use the Event Premises for the Season. The Season is continuous and may not be broken up over a larger period of time. During the other months outside of the Season, as defined above, the Licensee will not occupy, use, store property/equipment, place objects, or otherwise utilize in any way any portion of Central Park or the Event Premises. Accordingly,the Event Premises that is used by Licensee during the Season for set up,production,and take-down of equipment,staging,and other structures shall be cleared by Licensee and restored to the Event Premises' natural state and condition the other months of the year. The Event Premises shall be used by Licensee for the purposes of 3 24-15263/357005 presenting the Event to the public, including other ancillary activities related to the Event, including but not limited to the following: 5.1.1 The necessary preparation, set up, tear down and installation of Licensee's equipment on the Event Premises for the presentation of the Event, including, but not limited to,tents, signs, fences, generators, and lighting equipment. 5.1.2 The operation of concession stands for the sale of merchandising products and food on the Event Premises including the sale and consumption of nonalcoholic and alcoholic beverages. 5.1.3 The holding of promotional and media events by Licensee or its sponsors. 5.1.4 The operation of a ticket box office for the sale of Event tickets. 5.1.5 The installation of vans, offices, public services areas, kitchen or other facilities for the Event and operations. 5.1.6 Operation of a tram,at Licensee's option,within Huntington Central Park to shuttle participants from offsite parking to the Event Premises. 5.2 Licensee shall fulfill all requirements traditionally required of a City Specific Event, including but not limited to, business licensing, fire permits, and building and planning permits. 5.3 Licensee shall abide by all public safety regulations as set forth by the Huntington Beach Fire Department and the Huntington Beach Police Department. 5.4 Licensee shall be provided with all necessary access to the Event Premises at any time during the Term, including its right to conduct the Event on any day during the Term. 5.5 The normal operation of the Event shall be limited to the hours of 5:00 pm to 10:30 pm, local time, at which time the last show must be concluded, and guests with tickets must exit the Event Premises by 11:00 pm each night, unless otherwise agreed by the City. 5.6 Licensee shall conduct routine maintenance and inspections as needed during daylight hours.Licensee shall make every attempt to keep noise level at a minimum during maintenance and inspections. The Event Premises shall be used for the Licensed Use described herein and for no other purposes whatsoever. Licensee has personally inspected the Event Premises and the surrounding area and evaluated its suitability as a location for Licensee to occupy and use for conducting the Licensed Use. Licensee accepts the Event Premises in its present physical condition as of the Commencement Date and agrees to make no demands upon Licensor for any improvements or alterations of the Event Premises or elsewhere on the Real Property. 6. CONDITION OF PROPERTY AS-IS Licensee understands and agrees that the Event Premises shall be made available as-is by City. Licensee shall not be liable for any pre-existing condition of the Event Premises. Unless 4 24-15263/357005 otherwise agreed,Licensee will be responsible for all costs associated with materials necessary to make the Event Premises suitable for the presentation of the Event. 7. EVENT IMPACT 7.1 Event Premises Restoration. Subject to Section 27, Licensee upon conclusion of the Event shall promptly and timely restore the Event Premises to its condition as existed before the commencement of the Event and any Event activities. Such Event Premises restoration duties of Licensee include but are not limited to immediate cleaning by the Licensee of the entire Event Premises as well as immediate removal by Licensee of all trash and debris generated or caused by the Event and any Event activities. 7.2 Event Damages.Licensee is responsible for all costs and expenses to repair and/or replace any equipment,facilities or property damaged,including Event Premises restoration as provided for in Section 7.1 above, as a result of the Event and/or Licensee's use and occupation of the Event Premises. 7.3 Hazardous Substances. Licensee shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to hazardous materials and waste and shall timely comply with the orders of any governmental agencies relating thereto. Prior to any Event activities Licensee shall request that a representative from the Environmental Health Division of the Orange County Health Care Agency review hazardous material storage and use to determine that compliance with local laws and regulations has been obtained, and Licensee shall provide verification of the same to City. Licensee shall at its"own cost and expense remove all flammable and hazardous materials and waste as defined by state, federal, or local law immediately at the conclusion of the Event. Licensee shall make available for inspection to the City all records relating to the maintenance, release,mitigation,and cleanup of any hazardous substances on the premises of the Event Premises arising from or caused by the uses provided for in this Agreement. 8. UTILITIES AND SERVICES Licensee shall secure an account, separately meter, and be responsible for its own use of any electrical or water services as needed for the Event.Based on needs,Licensee will arrange for temporary electrical, water and sewage hookup and use during operations, subject to availability onsite. City shall collaborate with Licensee to find suitable connection points and will establish policies and procedures for the use of City infrastructure in support of the Event. 9. PARKING - City will collaborate with Licensee to find suitable parking accommodations near the Licensed Premises for the visitors of the Event. Licensee will submit a Parking Plan for City's review and approval,which may include the following options: a) overflow parking in the Huntington Central Park Sports Complex, when not in use, or on the nearby dirt lot, referred to as the "Marion Lot," with an option to provide a shuttle service; b) the reserved use of parking spaces in the Central Library parking lot on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings during hours where Central Library is closed; 5 24-15263/357005 c)the reserved use of parking spaces in the Gothard Parking lot for disabled placard only parking. 10. PAID PARKING Licensee shall charge a fee of at least$10 per space for parking and may charge a fee of up to $20 per space for parking in this reserved area,unless a different amount is agreed by Licensee and City in writing Parking fees collected in the areas shall be split between City and Licensee, with 60%payable to City and 40%payable to Licensee with the City to provide parking attendant staffing. This revenue sharing between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term (including extensions and/or options) of this Agreement. Where applicable, the proceeds for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks (14 days) after the close of each month in which Events occur and shall be placed in an account specifically for capital improvement projects to directly benefit Central Library and Central Park, including the restoration of the Library fountains and park irrigation systems. 11. TICKET SALES A "Ticket" as define above, is sold, one to each person, for attendance of an Event. All Ticket sales gross revenue for admission to, attendance of, viewing of, or participation in, the Event, shall be split between City and Licensee. YEAR 1: In year one(1)of this Agreement,City shall receive$3 per Ticket for all Tickets sold,with no limit on number of Tickets sold or cap on revenue to City. YEAR 2: In year two (2) of this Agreement, City shall receive $5 per Ticket for all Tickets sold,with no limit on number of Tickets sold or cap on revenue to City. YEAR 3: In year three (3) of this Agreement, City shall receive $5 per Ticket for all Tickets sold,with no limit on number of Tickets sold or cap on revenue to City. 11.1 GROUPS: In the event Licensee has large group Events for organizations, corporations, or other groups, i.e., "non-individual" Ticket Sales type Events, the "Ticket Sales" for that Event will be measured by the number of people of the organization,corporation,or group, that is admitted to the Event such that the City still realizes a "per person" or "individual in attendance"benefit from each Event. 11.2 TIMING OF PAYMENT: This revenue split between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term (including extensions and/or options) of this Agreement. The proceeds for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks after the close of each month in which Events occurred and may be deposited by the City into the City's general fund and used for any purpose. 11.3 MINIMUM GUARANTEE: Licensee guarantees a minimum of$150,000 per year to the City in total revenue unless the agreement is terminated by either the City or Licensee in accordance with the agreement. So, if Ticket Sales are less than expected,or the share of the City's portion of total, aggregate Event revenue falls below and annual total of$150,000 in any year, Licensee shall make up the difference for that year. 12. SPONSORSHIP REVENUE YEAR 1: In year one (1) of this Agreement, City shall receive 0%in Sponsorship Revenue. 6 24-15263/357005 YEAR 2: In year two (2) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20% of all Sponsorship Revenue. YEAR 3: In year three (3) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20% of all Sponsorship Revenue This revenue split between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term (including extensions and/or options) of this Agreement. The proceeds for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks after.the close of each month in which Events occurred and may be deposited by the City into the City's general fund and used for any purpose 13. FOOD AND BEVERAGE REVENUE YEAR 1: In year one(1) of this Agreement, City shall receive 0%of all Food and Beverage Revenue. YEAR 2: In year two (2) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20% net revenue for all Food and Beverage Revenue. YEAR 3: In year three (3) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20%net revenue for all Food and Beverage Revenue This revenue split between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term(including extensions and/or options)of this Agreement.The proceeds for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks after the close of each month in which Events occurred and may be deposited by the City into the City's general fund and used for any purpose. 14. PAYMENTS TO CITY FROM EVENTS Licensee agrees to pay City within two weeks after the close of each month in which Events occurred the City's share of the proceeds as described in Sections 10 and 11 by way of money wire transfer to the City's account. The account information for wire transfers will be provided by the City to the Licensee by separate side letter. 15. SPECIAL BENEFITS Licensee agrees to provide 1,000 Event Tickets directly to local,Huntington Beach based charities each year. Licensee also agrees to promote and host a Special Library Event for the Anniversary of the Library on or near the anniversary of the Central Library. This Special Library Event will offer discounted Ticket Sales. Licensee agrees to provide production of the event and City will receive ticket revenue for 5 mutually agreeable days, off-peak (Mon-Thurs) performances. Event to receive Food and Beverage revenue during the five (5) days to help offset performance costs. 16. PROACTIVE ACCOUNTING REPORTING In the interest of full disclosure, transparency, and public interest, along with the actual payment of proceeds from Parking, Ticket Sales, and donated Tickets to the City as described in Sections 10, 11, and 13 above, Licensee shall submit to the City a written report of all/gross Parking, Ticket Sales, and total number of individuals in attendance of each Event and net remittance to the City. This reporting shall show calculations for proceeds apportionment among 7 24-15263/357005 the City and Licensee,show amounts retained by Licensee,and show amounts remitted to the City, and include any donated Tickets. The form of this accounting can be by letter,email,or any other convenient form of communication so long as the parties agree it is an official record sufficient and reliable in form and substance to satisfy the requirements any applicable State standards for accounting and for any future/potential financial audit. 16.1 Auditing Requirements. Licensee shall comply throughout the term of the Agreement with any requested audit by either City or third party on behalf of City. 17. CERTAIN LICENSEE OBLIGATIONS 17.1 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Licensee shall comply throughout the term of the Agreement with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as all applicable rules and regulations established by City,both in effect as of the Effective Date and as both enacted and amended from time-to-time. This includes compliance with the American Disabilities Act, and any other federal, state and local law the governs art and/or entertainment events such as this on this scale. Accordingly, Licensee understands the need to procure and maintain at its cost, bathrooms, pedestrian pathways and access, and any other amenity required as a matter of law or common sense. 17.2 Environmental Review. The Event requires an environmental review and mitigation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). City reserves the right to require the application of appropriate mitigation measures to address potential environmental impacts that may be identified during the environmental review process. Licensee agrees to pay for the cost of any necessary environmental review as required by law and as required by the City for this Event unless the agreement is terminated by either the City or Licensee in accordance with the agreement. This City shall not contribute to any such review. Licensee agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall require City to exercise its legislative or police power, or to make any other approval, except as both authorized by law as well as consistent with the City's municipal and charter authority. 17.3 Taxes and Assessments. Licensee shall pay promptly and discharge all lawful taxes and assessments which may be levied by the federal, state, county, City or other tax levying body on any taxable interest of Licensee as well as all taxes and assessments on taxable personal property of whatever nature owned by Licensee and located on premises of the Event Premises, except for any real estate or similar land taxes applicable to the Event Premises itself. Subject to the foregoing, Licensee shall promptly pay all excise, license and permit fees of whatever nature applicable to the operation of Licensee's business. 17.4 Event Participant Liability Waivers. Licensee shall ensure that each Event participant executes a hold harmless liability waiver, in a form acceptable to City (with City consent to not be unreasonably withheld), pursuant to which Event participant both assumes the risk of injury, damages, or death, as well as Event participant releases the City from all liability in connection with the Event. 17.5 Service Contractors. At least fifteen (15) business days prior to the commencement of the Event, Licensee shall submit to City a written list of all persons or entities who will provide a service to or on behalf of Licensee for such Event. Licensee shall promptly update such written list and provide to City whenever there is a determination by Licensee 8 24-15263/357005 additional persons or entities, not on the original list, will provide a service to or on behalf of Licensee for such Event. 17.6 Improvements and Safety Systems. Licensee shall design and construct such improvements and safety systems for the Event as may be required by governmental authorities in accordance with plans and specifications approved by such authorities and the City. 17.7 Evacuation and Safety Plan. Licensee shall develop an Evacuation and Safety plan for the Event that addresses and mitigates any potential threats to public safety that may reasonably arise from the conduct of the Event, that shall be approved by the City no later than ten (10) days prior to the commencement of any Event. 17.8 Limited License to Use Event Branding.Licensee hereby grants to City the limited, non-assignable, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive license to use and deploy, during the term,Branding for an Event, in all reasonable forms for advertising and marketing,but only to the extent related to promotion of the Event, and subject in each instance to Licensee's prior written approval,which will not be unreasonably withheld by Licensee. 17.9 Operations,Equipment and Personnel.Except as otherwise provided for by this Agreement or an applicable Specific Events Permits, Licensee shall provide for (or cause to be provided) all Event-related equipment, supplies, personnel (including volunteers), training of personnel (including volunteers), Event manuals/programs, Event set-up and tear down, and all other technical and operational aspects of the Event. 17.10 Event Costs. Except as otherwise provided for by this Agreement or an applicable Specific Events Permits,Licensee shall be solely responsible for all expenses and costs necessary for the promotion,management and operation of the Event. 17.11 Local Suppliers. Licensee shall consider, to the best extent possible and in compliance with applicable laws, to use local suppliers for the promotion, management and operation of the Event, subject to production needs. 17.12 Local Accommodations.Licensee shall make reasonable efforts to both use properties located within the City of Huntington Beach,for Event-related accommodations needs, as to both it and all participants, exhibitors, attendees, and any other persons and organizations associated with the Event, subject to production needs. 17.13 Complimentary Sponsorship Package for City. Licensee shall provide City with a sponsorship benefits package (for use solely by City)to include, but not be limited to: 17.13.1 Prominent space for City usage from which City may promote City, such as a booth at a prime Event location; and 17.13.2 Prominent signage (advertising only the City) at certain mutually approved prime locations throughout the Event Premises; and, 17.13.3 Prominent placement of City's logo on selected public Event- related printed and internet material produced by Licensee,together with that of other sponsors or partners of the Event; and, 9 24-15263/357005 17.13.4 Prominent placement of City's logo and City's banner advertisements on all Event websites managed or controlled by Licensee, together with that of other sponsors or partners of the Event. City advertising material shall be provided by City to Licensee and use as-provided shall not be unreasonably withheld. 17.14 Complimentary Hospitality Package for City. Licensee shall provide City with a hospitality package (for use solely by City) to include 400 complimentary VIP sponsor hospitality passes for the Event per year for use by City's employees and representatives, which passes grant access to Event VIP/priority seating areas. 18. LICENSE PAYMENT In consideration of the License granted to Licensee herein, Licensee shall pay to City a one-time license fee of Fifteen Thousand US Dollars ($15,000.00). Should City and Licensee mutually decide to exercise the one(1)year extension as outlined in Section 4 "Term" above, the fee for the extension shall be an additional Ten Thousand US Dollars ($10,000.00) and the City's revised share for all Event ticket sales into the future will be $5 per ticket. There shall be no other form of consideration or payment to City, and all revenues derived from the Event, except for parking fees and ticket sales as described in Section 10 and 11 above, shall belong to Licensee exclusively. The Payment described herein is for the License granted to Licensee only. Licensee remains responsible for the payment of all taxes and charges related to Licensee's use of the Licensed Premises, including but not limited to,the collection and payment of sales tax related to Licensee's sale of merchandising products and food on the Licensed Premises during the presentation of the Event. 19. EVENT PREMISES KEPT SAFE At all times the Event Premises is under control of the Licensee for the Season, and specifically during the periods immediately before, during,and.after the Events series takes place, the Licensee shall, and hereby does guarantee that, the Event Premises will be safe; it will be suitable such that even when the Event Premises is setup,but not in active use,accessible portions, if any,will be safe for pedestrians,animals,children on bicycles or any other device,and any other being to enter,traverse, and use in a foreseeable way without harm, or even a slight risk of harm, to themselves. As such,Licensee assumes the role and responsibility herein to take any corrective measures necessary to make any and all conditions of the Event Premises safe for use during Events and when Events are not taking place. Additionally, it is the responsibility and role of the Licensee to ensure the security, storage, and delivery of the City's portion of the Ticket Sales referenced in Section 11. 20. HOLD HARMLESS: IDEMNIFICATION AND DEFENSE Event: Licensee hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, litigation, damages, losses, expenses,judgments, demands and defense costs,and consequential damage or liability of any kind or nature,however caused,including those resulting from death or injury to attendees or patrons of the Event,or City or Licensee's employees and damage to City or Licensee's property arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations or 10 24-15263/357005 operations herein undertaken by Licensee, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Licensee, any subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, including but not limited to concurrent active or passive negligence, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. Non-Event: Licensee also hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City,its officers,elected or appointed officials,employees,agents,and volunteers from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, litigation, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs, and consequential damage or liability of any kind or nature, however caused, including those resulting from any death or injury to individual on or near the Event Premises when Events are not taking place, or any private property or real property near or adjacent to the Event Premises when Events are not taking place, or City or Licensee's employees and damage to City or Licensee's property arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations or operations herein undertaken by Licensee, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Licensee, any subcontractors, anyone directly or iudirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, including but not limited to concurrent active or passive negligence, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. Environmental: Licensee and City agree to a limited joint defense to any legal challenges to this License under the City's Measure C or the Environmental Review and reporting conducted and performed by ESA pursuant to CEQA. That limited joint defense includes that Licensee shall make its selection of legal counsel of its choice and fully fund and bear any/all costs and expenses related to its legal counsel or defense of such legal actions. The City will undertake to join the defense with its attorney resources. The City will cooperate and support Licensee in defense of any legal challenge to this License under the City's Measure C or the Environmental Review pursuant to CEQA. As part of the defense,Licensee hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City,its officers,elected or appointed officials,employees,and agents from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, litigation, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs, and conseq uential damage or liability of any kind or nature, however caused, including those resulting from any challenge brought by any party the License under the City's Measure C or the Environmental Review and reporting conducted and performed by ESA pursuant to CEQA.Notwithstanding the foregoing,Licensee may instead elect to terminate this Agreement in the event of any legal challenges to this License under the City's Measure C or the , Environmental Review and reporting conducted and performed by ESA pursuant to CEQA. Except for any legal challenges as described in the preceding paragraph, Licensee will conduct all defenses at its sole cost and expense and City shall approve selection of Licensee's counsel. This indemnity and defense obligation shall apply to all claims and liability, including but not limited to, any claims related to whether the approval of the Event by City, or the Event itself, is in compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws, and regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Licensee. 21. WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1861, Licensee acknowledges awareness of Section 3700 et seq. of this Code,which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation; Licensee covenants that it will comply with such provisions prior to 11 24-15263/357005 commencing performance of the work hereunder. Licensee shall obtain and furnish to City workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in an amount of not less than the State statutory limits. Licensee shall require all subcontractors to provide such workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance for all the subcontractors'employees. Licensee shall furnish to City a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance and Licensee shall similarly require all subcontractors to waive subrogation. 22. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE In addition to the Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance and Licensee's covenant to defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, Licensee shall obtain and furnish to City, a policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage covering the use of the Licensed Premises. This policy shall indemnify Licensee, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims arising out of or in connection with the use of the Licensed Premises, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit,the aggregate limit must be no less than One Million Dollars($1,000,000) for the use of the Licensed Premises. This policy shall name City,its officers,elected or appointed officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the use of the Licensed Premises shall be deemed excess coverage and that Licensee's insurance shall be primary. Under no circumstances shall said above-mentioned insurance contain a self- insured retention, or a"deductible"or any other similar form of limitation on the required coverage. 23. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE Licensee shall obtain and furnish to City an automotive liability insurance policy covering the use of the Licensed Premises by it hereunder.This policy shall provide'coverage for Licensee's automotive liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars($1,000,000.00)per occurrence and a separate"Additional Insured Endorsement"page listing both the policy number and naming the "City of Huntington Beach, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers" as additional insured on the endorsement. The above-mentioned insurance shall not contain a self-insured retention, "deductible" or any similar form of limitation on the required coverage except with the express written consent of City. 24. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 24.1 Prior to any use of the Licensed Premises hereunder,Licensee shall furnish to City a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement;the certificate shall: 24.1.1 provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; 12 24-15263/357005 24.1.2 state that the policy is currently in force; and 24.1.3 promise that such policy shall not be suspended,voided or canceled by either party,reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. 24.2 Licensee shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force during the entire Term of this License, including any extensions of the Term as provided herein. 24.3 This requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from Licensee's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. City or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. Licensee shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 25. SIGNS,BANNERS, &MARKETING 25.1 Following review and approval by City,Licensee may erect, at its own cost and expense, its own signs and banners on the Licensed Premises. Licensee shall bear the cost of the installation,repair,maintenance and removal of its own signs and banners. 25.2 Pursuant to Section 13, Licensee shall offer a special event to benefit the Library in collaboration with City. The City shall designate various non-profit organizations to be entered into a lottery to be chosen as the beneficiary of the tickets referred to in Section 13. 25.3 City shall make available street banners and pennant locations throughout the City,when possible, at no additional cost to Licensee. 25.4 City shall assist Licensee with marketing on City social media pages, newsletters, and website. 26. COMPLIANCE WITH MEASURE C Licensee shall not use the Licensed Premises for any purpose that is prohibited by any law, statute, ordinance or governmental rule or regulation now in force, or that may be enacted or promulgated in the future. In no event shall Licensee build any permanent structure anywhere in Central Park or within the Event Premises. Only temporary structures that can be removed within one week,while leaving the subject property in the same condition it was in prior to the placement of the structure, may be erected or placed by Licensee in accordance with this Agreement within the Event Premises. 27. TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION City shall be entitled to immediately terminate this License Agreement in case of failure by Licensee to comply with the payment of the License Fee. In case of failure by Licensee to comply with any other terms or conditions of this License Agreement, City will first send notice to cure such default within thirty (30) days, except in case of emergency or for any default that cannot be reasonably be resolved within such delay, in which 13 24-15263/357005 case it shall provide a reasonable delay to cure.In the event Licensee does not remedy such default or take arrangement with City to remedy same in a delay agreed by the parties for any default that cannot be reasonably remedied within(30)days,City shall be able to pursue all available remedies under law, including specific performance,but excluding extra judicial termination. Licensee may terminate, without cause, within thirty (30) days after each year for year 2 and/or year 3. Licensee may not perform the event in any other Orange County location during year 2 or year 3. City may,without cause,terminate by providing thirty (30) days notice after the firstyear. Licensee to have the right to perform the event in any location, including Orange County. 27.1 Licensee shall be entitled to terminate this License Agreement upon the occurrence of any of the following events provided that the Licensee has timely applied for the required permits, licenses, authorizations, or consents for use of the Licensed Premises: 27.1.1 the failure by Licensee to obtain any of the required permits, licenses, authorizations or consents for the use of the Licensed Premises on conditions acceptable to Licensee, in which case this License Agreement may be terminated by Licensee upon simple notice, and each party shall be discharged from any liability or obligation towards the other. 27.1.2 the failure by the City to comply with or perform any term,condition or covenant and to cure such event within thirty (30) days after Licensee gives the City written notice of such default and opportunity to cure to City, in which case Licensee shall be able to pursue all available remedies under law. 27.2 Should Licensee not be able to present the Event on the Licensed Premises at any time during the Term for any reason at its discretion, Licensee will have the option to terminate this License Agreement upon thirty (30) day notice. Licensee shall return the Licensed Premises to City pursuant to the terms of this License Agreement, and each party shall be discharged from any further liability or obligation towards the other. 28. FORCE MAJUERE In the event either Party is prevented from performing any of its obligations, under either this Agreement, by reason of any event outside of such Party's control, including, without limitation,fire,weather, unsafe conditions,volcano, explosion, flood, landslide, epidemic, acts of nature, war, terrorism, or other hostilities, strike, civil commotion, domestic or foreign governmental acts,orders,any court order stopping or preventing the Event,or regulations("Force Majeure Event"),then such obligations of such Party during the duration of such Force Majeure Event, and for a reasonable time thereafter, will be suspended. In the case of cancellation of the Event due to a Force Majeure Event,the Parties agree to negotiate a date to reschedule such Event if practicable. If such canceled Event cannot reasonably be rescheduled or relocated within the City, neither Party shall be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement solely because of such cancellation. Neither any such cancellation, rescheduling, or relocation, nor the inability to reschedule or relocate, will, by itself, cause this Agreement to terminate. 29. RESTORE LICENSED PREMISES 14 24-15263/357005 END OF SEASON: At the end of the Seasonal timeframe for Event set up, production, and take-down,Licensee shall remove from the Licensed Premises all equipment,signs,structures, objects, and other personal property placed on the Licensed Premises and return the Licensed Premises to the City restored to the Premises natural state and condition. END OF TERM: At the end of the Term or upon earlier termination of this License Agreement, Licensee shall remove from the Licensed Premises all equipment, signs, and other personal property placed by it on the Licensed Premises and return the Licensed Premises to the City restored to the Premises natural state and condition. The Licensee may leave any pre-agreed materials used on the Licensed Premises or otherwise agreed to by City, which the Licensee shall be entitled to leave on the Licensed Premises at the end of the Term. On the last day of the Term (or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practical), a duly authorized representative of the City and of Licensee shall together inspect the Licensed Premises to evaluate the state of the Licensed Premises.If the City is satisfied with the return condition of the Licensed Premises,the City agrees to sign the release form attached hereto as Exhibit"B." Licensee shall not be liable for any pre-existing condition; however, Licensee shall be liable for any damage occurring from the use of the Licensed Premises for the scope of the Event. Licensee shall return at the end of Term and/or end of Season the Licensed Premises in the condition in which it was received at the beginning of the Term; a restoration fee of $50,000 annually to be paid by Licensee to City for the restoration of turf, foliage and other landscape impactsThe Licensee will allow City to perform essential landscaping and maintenance on City trees, foliage, and water systems with reasonable written notice. 30. ASSIGNMENT This License is personal to Licensee, and Licensee shall have no right to assign its rights hereunder or to sublicense the Licensed Premises. 31. NOTICES All notices or demands to be given by either Party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given either when delivered in person or two (2) days after being sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, via email, or by a national air courier company that provides signature verification of delivery to recipient, to the respective Parties at the addresses provided in this Section of this Agreement. The address to which any notice or demand may be given to either Party may be changed from time to time by written notice to the other. Notice Address: To City—addressed to each: To Licensee: City Manager, City Attorney& City Clerk 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 32. APPLICABLE LAW. 15 24-15263/357005 The existence, validity, and construction of this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the state of California without reference to its conflicts of laws or principles; provided, that(i) any provision which may be held invalid shall be ineffective only to the extent of such invalidity and shall not invalidate any of the remaining provisions, (ii) this License Agreement shall not be construed as creating either a Licenseeship, an agency or an employment relationship between the Parties, and(iii)the failure of any Party to insist at any time upon the strict performance of any provision or to act upon any right or remedy available to such Party, whether under the License Agreement or as a matter of law, shall not be interpreted as a waiver or a relinquishment of any such right or remedy unless specifically expressed in writing, signed by such Party and neither the receipt, acceptance nor application of any payment shall, without more, constitute such a writing. 33. MUNICIPAL POWERS. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a limitation upon the powers and authority of City as a chartered city of the State of California. 34. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. The rights and remedies provided by this Agreement are given in addition to any other rights and remedies either Party may have by law, statute, ordinance or otherwise. All such rights and remedies are intended to be cumulative,and the use of any one right or remedy by either Party shall not preclude or waive its right to any or all other rights or remedies. 35. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of each and every provision contained within this Agreement. 36. DEFAULT. Upon default by Licensee in performance of any of the terms and conditions required by this Agreement, City may give notice to Licensee and the reasons for the default. The written notice shall include the timeframe in which Licensee may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively (thirty (30) business days, but may be extended, or reduced in case of emergency, if circumstances warrant, as determined by City acting reasonably. Circumstances warranting a reduced timeframe to cure include, but are not limited to, when a default involves either public safety or immediate waste or damage to City property. If Licensee does not cure the default by conclusion of noticed timeframe, then notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, City may terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part at City's sole discretion, upon written notice to Licensee,without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Licensee's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 36.1 REMOVAL OF PROPERTY: In any event that Licensee leaves or allows any of its property to remain in any part of the Central Park area, including within the Event Premises,beyond the license permissions of this Agreement and without written consent of the City,the City shall be entitled to remove Licensee's property 16 24-15263/357005 with all costs of such removal to Licensee. Reimbursement of such costs to City by Licensee shall occur within thirty(30) days of City notification to Licensee. 37. NO ORAL OR IMPLIED WAIVERS OR MODIFICATIONS. If either Party fails to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or any rights hereunder or fails to exercise any election provided in this Agreement, it will not be considered to be a waiver of those provisions, rights or elections or in any way affect the validity of this Agreement. The failure of either Party to exercise any of these provisions, rights or elections will not preclude or prejudice such Party from later enforcing or exercising the same or any other provisions, rights or elections which it may have under this Agreement.No waiver will be of any force or effect unless set forth in a writing signed by the Party whose right is being waived. Subject to the immediately preceding sentence, no modifications to this Agreement will be binding upon the Parties unless modified, amended,cancelled,renewed, or extended in a writing signed by both Parties. 3 8. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement (including all exhibits hereto) sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and,with respect to such subject matter, supersedes and replaces all prior agreements, arrangements and understandings,written or oral, between the Parties. Except as may be expressly set forth herein, there are no promises, conditions, representations, understanding, interpretations or terms of any kind as conditions or inducement to the execution hereof or in effect between the Parties. 39. INTERPRETATION. The section headings included in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect or be utilized in construing or interpreting this Agreement. If any term, clause or provision hereof is held invalid or unenforceable by an arbitrator or a, court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity will not affect the validity or operation of any other term, clause or provision and such invalid term, clause, or provision will be deemed to be severed from this Agreement.Neither-this Agreement nor any provision herein will be construed in favor or against either Party based on which Party drafted this Agreement or such provision. 40. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Licensee, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Licensee or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 41. MISCELLANEOUS 41.1 Authority: City represents and warrants that (i) it has the right, power and authority to enter into and execute the present Agreement without additional formality, and (ii) it is not party to any agreement which prohibits the City from entering into this Agreement.Licensee represents that it has the necessary rights,power and authority to enter into and execute the present Agreement. 41.2 Waiver: No waiver, whether written or tacit, of any remedy or provisions of the present Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other provision hereof or 17 24-15263/357005 a permanent waiver of the provision concerned, unless otherwise stated in writing by the party to be bound thereby. 41.3 Relationship: The Parties are acting herein solely as independent contractors.Nothing herein contained will create or be construed as creating a Licenseeship,joint venture, or agency relationship between the Parties. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that it neither has nor will give the appearance or impression of having any legal authority to bind or commit the other Party in any way. Each Party will be solely responsible for all wages, income taxes, worker's compensation, and any other requirements for all personnel it supplies in connection with this Agreement. 41.4 Intellectual Property: It is understood that all commercial, intellectual property or other rights related to the Event or any of Licensee's operations and projects shall belong to Licensee exclusively. Nothing in this Agreement or during its application shall be construed as providing to City any commercial, intellectual property or other rights related to the Event or any of Licensee's operations and projects. For greater certainty and without limitation, all intellectual property rights of any nature related to the Event or any of Licensee's operations and projects or any idea or concept discussed or shared in connection therewith between the parties shall belong to Licensee exclusively. 41.5 Accessory Agreement and Documents: Each of the parties shall, at the request of the other, execute all such agreements, instruments and documents as shall be reasonably necessary to give effect to the present Agreement or to facilitate its application and execution. Upon approval as to form by the City Attorney, City's Director of Community and Library Services is hereby authorized to execute such accessory agreements and documents on City's behalf. 41.6 Counterparts: The present agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts and all such executed counterparts shall constitute one(1)Agreement binding on all of the Parties in spite of the fact that all of the Parties have not signed the same counterpart. This Agreement may be delivered via facsimile transmission or in electronic "pdf' or similar format with the same force and effect as if originally executed copies of it were delivered to all Parties. 41.7 Reasonableness: The Parties shall at all times act prudently, fairly, equitably, reasonably, promptly and in good faith in dealing with one another under this Agreement and shall not unreasonably withhold or delay any consents, approvals, authorizations, exercises of discretion, exercises of judgment or the like provided in this Agreement. 41.8 Headings and Gender: The section headings are for convenience only and shall have no legal significance. The masculine, feminine or neuter gender, and the singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the others whenever the context so indicates or requires. The term"including" shall be deemed to mean"including,but not by way of limitation. 41.9 Cumulative Remedies: The various rights, options, elections, powers and remedies contained in this Agreement shall be construed as cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of any of the others or of any other legal or equitable remedy which either Party might otherwise have in the event of a breach or default in the terms of this Agreement. The exercise of 18 24-15263/357005 one right or remedy by such Party shall not impair its right to any other right or remedy until all obligations imposed on the other Party have been fully performed. 41.10 Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation or other proceeding brought to enforce this License Agreement, each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. The prevailing party will not be entitled to recover its attorneys'fees,costs,and expenses in connection with such litigation or other proceeding from the other party. REST OF PAGE NOT USED 19 24-15263/357005 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have executed this License Agreement by and through their authorized officers on February 18 ,2021.2025. LICENSEE: CITY: :BY E �`�••' _�-� .4i y Print name: Mayor Its: ATT ' By. r Print name: Its: City Clerk APPRO ED AS TO FORM: City Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: rector of Communi and Library —Services REVIEWED AND APPROVED: Interimk'ty anager 20 24-15263/357005 EXHIBIT "A" SITE PLAN OF LICENSED PREMISES 21 24-15263/357005 I I 3 I 3 I I I e I / a I e I no t ) v I i3 I 1c r I;. I 16 1 1/ I Itl I m1 �rl LEGENDww A Eoom�m A M I I ROWERS k S •n"rrowRv FENCEEXISTING►ATH ; qSECTIONAL `s a <al t F ��!*.I a. q z1 8 c l �`�-7� & r .. N. TECHNICAL ROOM _ / .,fir „'^kry -v'�^ -a �,,.,.. �._�,_ -_._..._ - — / - : d'T. PST 7T} � - — z °? g r[p�uce Pas , o-..y 7 ': A ..,.., \..::',, : : :: '77,:*.ow,'v,:, „../:\ :cp---: „ — — � �v N. • • R uN IaMI n 1i 1 *LEACHER 2062 SEATS — „. . • / ,;a:_ .. ._,.,4„:"Ist,1 I,:, , . . _,,. — �• _ - sirnmm�nnrn C I•'• •. •' ••• .. • U4fillV611: wInY I1G�•R1u.■ j I4'T 4R\FL`UNBRSAAEA �^ IFIIfi11 I r.nII.0 j • �. � ^l f • r 3 t Nf •• Ok F tf/,,,NV.fH 1 ( i''{ 1,f' / _ Wx•...� �,...,, M1' - ` I x, - , . 'c,. a x �, t: � J •^,, / J tl 5 -.We 1 - i of tO OFFICE K K This plan is subject to change based on Production and Artistic needs. r.a r iLLUMI DIRECTORS SCALE: UNIT: (SITE: LAYOUT: SERIE: STALE S Normand Latourelle(Producer) 1"=25' FT(m) HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY E CHFL CA)2 SITE PLAN GENERAL CLOSE UP Al 01 PRELIMINARY HNTINGTO BEACH CA)2025 Jocelyn Langelier(VP Production) PAPER SIZE: CIVIC ADDRESS: SURVEY SOURCE: TYPE OF TERRAIN: CREATION DATE:Itltl/mm/yyyy) -644 * ARCH FULL BLEED E(36"X48°) 19/09/2024 L J PROJELT MANAGER: CONVERSION TABLE. ALTITUDE: ZONING VERSION DATE:ltltl/mm/yyyyl 4f 100101'6 Foot-Meter=0.3048m(30.48cm) — -- 19/09/2024 Meter-Foot=3.2808399'(3'3-t/I')(39'/I') DRAFTER: 100RdNATES: PERIMETER: VERSION REVISION: Foot-Mee =0.092900304 — __ 1-01 Meter,-Foot'=10.76391 VO1 AleX EXHIBIT "B" FORM OF RELEASE I,the undersigned, a duly authorized representative of City, acknowledge having inspected the site for which a License Agreement was issued (the "Licensed Premises")by City for the benefit of Licensee, and declare that the Licensed Premises has been returned to the City in a satisfactorily condition in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Therefore, the City hereby waives all claims it may have against Licensee in respect to the return condition of the Licensed Premises. • By: Print name: Title: Date: 22 24-15263/357005 • Certificate of Insurance Insurer Intact Insurance Company Address 2450 Girouard Street West, St-Hyacinthe,QC J2S 3B3 Insured Flowers of the Sky Entertainment LLC Address Broker VEZINA ASSURANCES INC.,une societe de Marsh&McLennan Agency LLC This is to certify to: Certificate Holder City of Huntington Beach,its officers,elected or appointed officials,employees,agents and volunteers Address 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA 92648 This certificate is issued as a matter of information only.It certifies that policies of insurance as described below have been issued to the named Insured for the period indicated.The insurance afforded is subject to the terms,conditions and exclusions of the applicable policies. Yes No X That the insurance policies described below are presently in force. O ❑ That the coverages of the aforesaid policies are extended to the Certificate Holder indicated above,added as an additional insured,however it is specified that this certificate applies only with regards to the Insured's premises,operations or projects described below. O ❑ It is further agreed that if other valid and collectible insurance is available to the Additional Insured for a bodily injury,property damage or Personal Injury and Advertising Injury covered under this policy,this insurance is primary and non-contributory. ❑ 0 Description of the Insured's premises, Light show operations or APPRO ED AS TO FORM projects: B MICHAEL J.VICLIOTTA Civil Liability Coverages CITY ATTORNEY la Commercial General Liability—Max Limits TAN.:n o r tieuNTU�Gcy ITO�BEAt ,iTy Yes No QClaims made Form Limitations o. Date X Commercial General Liability 171-2897 01/12/2025 Bodily Injury and Property Damage—Occurrence Basis each occurence $ 2 000 000 CAD Aggregate Limit Product-Completed Operations Hazard each policy period $ 2 000 000 CAD ❑ 0 General Aggregate Limit(other that PCO Hazard) each policy period N/A O ❑ Personal Injury and Advertising Injury any one person $ 2 000 000 CAD O ❑ Standard Non-Owned Automobile Policy(Q.P.F.6) each occurence $ 2 000 000 CAD g ❑ Commercial Umbrella Liability each occurence $ 8 000 000 CAD 171-2897 01/12/2025 Aggregate Limit Product-Completed Operations Hazard each policy period $ 8 000 000 CAD Other Coverages Yes Limitations Limits of Insurance Policy No. Expiry Date O Automobile Liability Insurance each occurence $ 2 000 000 P94115625E 31/07/2025 ❑ $ ❑ $ Note:Only the coverages marked with an"X"in the 1st column are granted. Except with respect to the reduction of the limits of insurance as a result of the occurrence of an insured loss, the Insurer undertakes to provide the Certificate Holder with 30 days'notice of any reduction or cancellation of the insurance policies. Date 03/03/2025 By Christine Brunet BROKER 84-L-014.0e(10.20) Contrat 171-2897 [intact] Responsabilite civile • 091 .0 e — Additional Insured 'Project (0219) Applicable to form 091.0e.Commercial General Liability Max. It is agreed that City of Huntington Beach,its officers,elected or appointed officials, employees,agents and volunteers is added as an Additional Insured but only with respect to liability arising from the activities executed by the Named Insured in connection with the following:"Light show". It is also agreed that the Insurer waives its subrogration rights against this Additional Insured. It is further agreed that if other valid and collectible insurance is available to this Additional Insured for a"personal injury"or"property damage"covered under this policy,this insurance is primary and non-contributory. Words and phrases that appear in bold and/or in quotation marks are defined within the present or to the Definitions section of the present policy. All other terms and conditions of the policy remain unchanged. 2025-04-08 GE0019 Assurance des entreprises [intact] Conditions particulieres Contrat 171-2897 Intact Compagnie d'assurance 2450 rue Girouard Ouest Saint-Hyacinthe QC J2S 3B3 Nom et adresse postale de('Assure Courtier 3032 CAVALIA INC. Vezina Assurances inc. 4215 rue D'iberville 4374,avenue Pierre-De-Coubertin MONTREALQC Montreal,QC H2H 2L5 H 1 V 1 A6 Tel.514 253 5221 _6A.' ..7;4:,,e,,,,„„st — f , Renseignements generaux Intact Compagnie d'assurance,ci-apres nomme l'Assureur. Type de document MODIFICATION Duree Du 1 decembre 2024 au 1 decembre 2025 A Oh01,heure locale a I'adresse postale de('Assure indiquee ci-dessus Date de prise d'effet de la modification 3 mars 2025 /March 3,2025 Raison de la modification Ajout dun assure additionnel/Additionnal Insured added , e74a a�" Molns de papier,plus de,commadltel Pour recevoirvos documents d'assurance electronlquement, a parlez a votre courtier. ..�.% Cette police comprend des clauses pouvant limiter le montant a payer 2025-04-08(PCH-N) BUR 01 COPIE ASSURE Premiervice-president,Intact Assurance,Quebec [intact] Contrat 171-2897 Intact Compagnie d'assurance Divers `, Garanties Formulaire R.P. Franchise Montant de garantie $ $ Erreurs et omissions involontaires 600.6-1 Avis de resiliation 007.0-1 L'Assureur s'engage a ne pas resilier ou reduire le contrat sans donner au prealable un avis de 30jours a: WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN 3404 STATE RD, BAKERSFIELD CA 93308 --> City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Avis de resiliation 007.0-1 L'Assureur s'engage a ne pas resilier ou reduire le contrat sans donner au prealable un avis de 30 jours a: KENAIDAN CONTRACTING LTD 7080 Derrycrest Drive Mississauga,ON L5W 0G5 En tant que proprietaire du stationnement Modification du nom d'Assure(0215) GE0007 Affectation exacte(1214) GE0009 COPIE ASSURE Contrat 171-2897 Responsabilite civile. Garanties Formulaire Franchise Montant de garantie $ $ Responsabilite civile des entreprises-Max 091.0-5 Garantie A-Dommages corporels et 25 000 2 000 000 materiels-par sinistre Garantie A-Montant global pour risque 2 000 000 produits-apres travaux-par periode d'assurance Garantie A-Franchise applicable au 25 000 dommage materiel Garantie B-Prejudice personnel et 2 000 000 prejudice imputable a la publicite-par personne Garantie C-Frais medicaux-par personne 50 000 Garantie D-Responsabilite locative par 10 000 2 000 000 lieu Exclusion des pratiques en matiere 607.2-2 d'emploi Responsabilite affaires 3.0 090.7-1 Selon le formulaire Exclusion liee a Tabus 090.9-1 Exclusion Liee a la Pyrite ou Pyrrhotite 112.0-1 F.P.Q.no.6 Police d'assurance automobile 094.9-1 2 000 000 du Quebec-Formule des non-proprietaires F.A.Q.no.6-94 Responsabilite civile du fait 099.4-1 2 500 100 000 de dommages a des vehicules loues et/ou utilises en vertu de contrats F.A.Q.no 6-96-Avenant de responsabilite 112.1-1 assumee par contrat 090.5—Avenant de suppression GE0001 d'extension(s)—Responsabilite affaires (0219) Exclusion—Garantie B-Divertissement GE0002 (1111) EXCLUSION DES PRODUITSSPECIAUX— GE0003 CONSEILS,INDICATIONS,SUGGESTIONS OU DIRECTIVES(0618) Avenant d'ajustement de prime GE0014 COPIE INTERETADDITIONNEL [intact] Contrat 171-2897 Intact Compagnie d'assurance Responsabilite civile complementaire ou excedentaire Garanties Formulaire Decouvert Montant obligatoire de garantie $ $ Responsabilite civile complementaire des 096.0-6 entreprises Montant global 25 000 8 000 000 Par sinistre 25 000 8 000 000 Exclusion-Pratiques d'emploi 601.1-2 Modification de la definition de prejudice 601.6-3 personnel et prejudice imputable a la publicite F.P.Q.no.7-Police d'assurance 096.8-2 automobile du Quebec-Formule d'assurance excedentaire de la responsabilite civile Exclusion liee a Tabus 113.8-1 Responsabilite civile complementaire- 113.9-2 Avenant de limitation Responsabilite Affa i res Assurances en premiere ligne Duree Type de contrat Assureur Numero Date de Date Montant de contrat prise d'effet d'expiration de garantie Responsabilite civile generale Intact Compagnie d'assurance 171-2897 1 decembre 2024 1 decembre 2025 2 000 000 Responsabilite civile automobile Aviva Canada Inc. P941156258 31 juillet 2024 31 juillet 2025 2 000 000 COPIE INTERET ADDITIONNEL Contrat 171-2897 Dispositions supplementaires Formulaire Exclusions communes 003.1-8 Avenant de declaration d'unesituation d'urgence 003.2-4 Exclusion relative aux maladies transmissibles 056.5-1 Exclusion relative aux substances 057.7-1 perfluoroalkylees et polyfluoroalkylees(SPFA) Exclusion de la responsabilite civile-Donnees 057.8-1 electroniques et sinistre lie au cyberrisque Dispositions generates 240.0-7 Clause relative aux Garanties hypothecaires 242.0-1 (Approuve par le BAC) En cas d'urgence En cas de sinistre grave en dehors des heures d'ouverture, veuillez composer le numero suivant: 1 866 464 2424 COPIE INTERETADDITIONNEL Contrat 171-2897 [ifltact] Divers Modification du nom d'Assure (0215) II est entendu que le nom de I'Assure designe aux Conditions particulieres dolt se lire comme suit Cavalia Inc.; Haute Voltige Inc.; Cavalia Artistic Services Management Inc.; Centre de Creation Cavalia; Cavalia gestion de services artistiques(Odysseo)Inc. Productions Normand Latourelle Ltee; PNL productions hivernales Inc. Illumi Productions Inc. Centre de developpement CREALLUMI Cavalia USA Inc.; Cavalia International Entertainment LLC; Gestion Symphonie des Fleurs Inc. Les productions Normand Latourelle Intemationnal Inc. 4554434 Canada Inc; 6328628 Canada Inc.; 9949003 Canada inc, 9371-1638 Quebec Inc. 10390500 Canada Inc. 10489301 Canada Inc. 9505-3773 Quebec inc. Stars On Earth Entertainment LLC STARS AND FLOWERS ENTERTAINMENT (USA)INC. FLOWERS OF THE SKY ENTERTAINMENT LLC 15098629 CANADA INC. 15099510 Canada inc. BAY12 Art Centers Les termes indiques en gras et/ou entre guillemets sont definis dans le present avenant ou au chapitre Definitions du present contrat. Toutes les autres conditions du contrat demeurent inchangees. 2025-03-18 LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND FLOWERS OF THE SKY ENTERTAINMENT LLC THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day of ,2025 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation and charter city("City"), and Flowers of the Sky LLC, hereinafter referred to as"Licensee." City and Licensee are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a"Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Licensee is the United States producer of the event titled Symphony of Flowers. Symphony of Flowers is an acclaimed outdoor multimedia show, path, and experience, featuring thousands of lights and special effects across a field of multimedia flowers and activities (the"Event"); and WHEREAS,Licensee plans to License, or use, occupy, and/or utilize the Event Premises for a period of months of each year of the Term. This period between the conclusion of the City's Civil War Reenactment and the American Revolutionary War Reenactment,or"season,"provides for setting up by Licensee of equipment,sets,or other objects on the Event Premises for the Events, a period of producing the Event for audiences, followed by time to take-down and removal of equipment, sets, or other objects from the Event Premises; and WHEREAS, City is owner of record of that certain real property located in the State of California,County of Orange,City of Huntington Beach commonly known as Huntington Central Park(the "Central Park"); and WHEREAS, it was the City that approached the Symphony of Flowers to come to the City. It is an event viewed by the City that would bring artistic value to the community and at the same time provide economic benefit to the City of Huntington Beach and the taxpayers; and WHEREAS, City recognizes the value of hosting the Symphony of Flowers for the enjoyment of its residents and the global community, the economic benefits brought to the City, and the showcasing of art, natural beauty, resources, enterprises, attractions, climate and parks of the City of Huntington Beach; and WHEREAS, Licensee desires and City agrees to allow Licensee certain rights to use a portion of the Central Park as shown on the drawing attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"A"(the"Event Premises"or"Licensed Premises")for the purpose of presenting the Event to the public as further described below(the"Licensed Use"); and WHEREAS, City desires to grant such License to Licensee on the terms and conditions set forth herein, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,the Parties agree as follows: 24-15263/357005 T 456 AGREEMENT 1. RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and the same are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. DEFINITIONS. 2.1 "Branding"means the promotion of the Event by means of advertising and distinctive design, including but not limited'to trademarks and copyrights associated with the Event. 2.2 "Business day"means a day on which City hall is open for business. 2.3 "Chapter 13.54"refers to Chapter 13.54 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and any amendments thereto. 2.4 "City Parking Spaces" refers to those public parking spaces located at the Event Premises which are available for public use and not already encumbered or reserved by a law enforcement agency(to provide law enforcement for the Event). 2.5 "Event Participant" or"Attendee" or"Patron"means a person, business or organization that performs, participates in(inclusive of Vendors), or is showcased in the Event. 2.6 "Food and/or Beverage Vendor" means a Vendor who prepares and sells, or simply sells,food and/or beverage to Event attendees. 2.7 "HBMC" means the municipal code of the City of Huntington Beach. 2.8 "Vendor" means all Event Participants, exhibitors and any other persons, businesses and organizations associated with the Event,who offer a product or item,for sale or for giveaway,to Event attendees, and/or engage in some form of promotion to Event attendees. 2.9 "Event" means the Symphony of Flowers outdoor multimedia show, path, and experience, featuring thousands of lights and special effects across a field of multimedia flowers and activities. 2.10 "Event Premises" means that portion of the Central Park as shown on the drawing attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit"A." 2.11 A "Ticket" is a coupon or certificate of admission to be sold, one to each person, for admission for attendance of an Event. 3. LICENSE. 3.1 Grant. City grants a license to Licensee to use the Event Premises, during the term provided for in Section 5, below, for the Licensee to manage and operate the Event, and for no other purpose, and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 3.2 Purpose. The purpose of the grant of this license is for both the use by Licensee of public property, for the purpose of managing and operating both the Event as well as 2 24-15263/357005 nRAFT457 specified activities related and incidental thereto, as well as the articulation of certain conditions, duties, obligations and benefits for Parties that are attendant to the grant of this license. 3.3 Disclaimer of Tenancy.Licensee is not a tenant or lessee of City and holds no rights of tenancy or leasehold in relation to the Event Premises.In consideration of City's grant of this license, Licensee specifically and expressly waives, releases, and relinquishes any and all rights to assert any claim of right,privilege or interest in the Event Premises other than the rights expressly granted by both this Agreement as well as an applicable Specific Events Permit. 3.4 Disclaimer of Liability. Licensee covenants, agrees and warrants that City is not liable for any loss, damages or injury to the person, or property of any person, whatsoever at any time, occasioned by or arising out of any act or omission of Licensee, or of anyone acting as the agent, employee, customer or representative of Licensee,pursuant to the uses, activities or occupancy provided for by both the license granted under this Agreement. 3.5 Disorderly Persons.Notwithstanding the license provided herein, City shall have the right to refuse entrance to the Event, or remove and eject from the Event, any person associated with the Event or present at the Event, whose conduct, in the reasonable judgment of the City, is objectionable, disorderly, disruptive or in violation of any law. The indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall apply to any claim or cause of action arising from such refusal or ejectment. 4. TERM The Term of this License is three (3) years, commencing on the Effective Date, and concluding exactly three years to the day from the Commencement Date(the"Term"). Although, as provided below,the Event occurs only six(6)months of each year. If mutually agreed by City and Licensee,an extension of one(1)year may be provided following the conclusion of the initial - Term. No occupation prior to or after the Term will occur unless the Licensee has obtained the prior written consent of City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is understood that Licensee may begin surveying and site marking prior to the beginning of the Term at no additional cost to the Licensee. 5. USE OF EVENT PREMISES 5.1 SEASONAL: Although the Term of the License is measured in years, the Event may only take place in a series of months each year between the conclusion of the City's Civil War Reenactment and the beginning of the City's American Revolutionary War Reenactment (that span of months between, as "Season"). This Season is typically between the conclusion of Labor Day weekend and the beginning of the Month of March; although exact dates may vary. At all times, this License, the Licensee, and the timing of the Event is subject to, and dependent on, the timing of the conclusion of the City's Civil War Reenactment and the beginning of the City's American Revolutionary War Reenactment. As such, this License Agreement contemplates and provides for Licensee to use the Event Premises for the Season. The Season is continuous and may not be broken up over a larger period of time. During the other months outside of the Season, as defined above, the Licensee will not occupy, use, store property/equipment, place objects, or otherwise utilize in any way any portion of Central Park or the Event Premises. Accordingly,the Event Premises that is used by Licensee 3 24-15263/357005 D krj)' AJ 458 during the Season for set up,production,and take-down of equipment,staging,and other structures shall be cleared by Licensee and restored to the Event Premises' natural state and condition the other months of the year. The Event Premises shall be used by Licensee for the purposes of presenting the Event to the public, including other ancillary activities related to the Event, including but not limited to the following: 5.1.1 The necessary preparation, set up, tear down and installation of Licensee's equipment on the Event Premises for the presentation of the Event, including, but not limited to,tents, signs,fences, generators, and lighting equipment. 5.1.2 The operation of concession stands for the sale of merchandising products and food on the Event Premises including the sale and consumption of nonalcoholic and alcoholic beverages. 5.1.3 The holding of promotional and media events by Licensee or its sponsors. 5.1.4 The operation of a ticket box office for the sale of Event tickets. 5.1.5 The installation of vans, offices, public services areas, kitchen or other facilities for the Event and operations. 5.1.6 Operation of a tram,at Licensee's option,within Huntington Central Park to shuttle participants from offsite parking to the Event Premises. 5.2 Licensee shall fulfill all requirements traditionally required of a City Specific Event, including but not limited to, business licensing, fire permits, and building and planning permits. 5.3 Licensee shall abide by all public safety regulations as set forth by the Huntington Beach Fire Department and the Huntington Beach Police Department. 5.4 Licensee shall be provided with all necessary access to the Event Premises at any time during the Term, including its right to conduct the Event on any day during the Term. 5.5 The normal operation of the Event shall be limited to the hours of 5:00 pm to 10:30 pm, local time, at which time the last show must be concluded, and guests with tickets must exit the Event Premises by 11:00 pm each night, unless otherwise agreed by the City. 5.6 Licensee shall conduct routine maintenance and inspections as needed during daylight hours.Licensee shall make every attempt to keep noise level at a minimum during maintenance and inspections. The Event Premises shall be used for the Licensed Use described herein and for no other purposes whatsoever. Licensee has personally inspected the Event Premises and the surrounding area and evaluated its suitability as a location for Licensee to occupy and use for conducting the Licensed Use. Licensee accepts the Event Premises in its present physical condition as of the Commencement Date and agrees to make no demands upon Licensor for any improvements or alterations of the Event Premises or elsewhere on the Real Property. 4 24-15263/357005 DRAFT 459 6. CONDITION OF PROPERTY AS-IS Licensee understands and agrees that the Event Premises shall be made available as-is by City. Licensee shall not be liable for any pre-existing condition of the Event Premises. Unless otherwise agreed,Licensee will be responsible for all costs associated with materials necessary to make the Event Premises suitable for the presentation of the Event. 7. EVENT IMPACT 7.1 Event Premises Restoration. Subject to Section 27, Licensee upon conclusion of the Event shall promptly and timely restore the Event Premises to its condition as existed before the commencement of the Event and any Event activities. Such Event Premises restoration duties of Licensee include but are not limited to immediate cleaning by the Licensee of the entire Event Premises as well as immediate removal by Licensee of all trash and debris generated or caused by the Event and any Event activities. 7.2 Event Damages.Licensee is responsible for all costs and expenses to repair and/or replace any equipment,facilities or property damaged,including Event Premises restoration as provided for in Section 7.1 above,as a result of the Event and/or Licensee's use and occupation of the Event Premises. 7.3 Hazardous Substances. Licensee shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to hazardous materials and waste and shall timely comply with the orders of any governmental agencies relating thereto. Prior to any Event activities Licensee shall request that a representative from the Environmental Health Division of the Orange County Health Care Agency review hazardous material storage and use to determine that compliance with local laws and regulations has been obtained, and Licensee shall provide verification of the same to City.Licensee shall at its own cost and expense remove all flammable and hazardous materials and waste as defined by state, federal, or local law immediately at the conclusion of the Event. Licensee shall make available for inspection to the City all records relating to the maintenance, release,mitigation,and cleanup of any hazardous substances on the premises of the Event Premises arising from or caused by the uses provided for in this Agreement. 8. UTILITIES AND SERVICES Licensee shall secure an account, separately meter, and be responsible for its own use of any electrical or water services as needed for the Event. Based on needs,Licensee will arrange for temporary electrical, water and sewage hookup and use during operations, subject to availability onsite. City shall collaborate with Licensee to find suitable connection points and will establish policies and procedures for the use of City infrastructure in support of the Event. 9. PARKING City will collaborate with Licensee to find suitable parking accommodations near the Licensed Premises for the visitors of the Event. Licensee will submit a Parking Plan for City's review and approval,which may include the following options: 5 24-15263/357005 _'v:%Li `a I 460 a) overflow parking in the Huntington Central Park Sports Complex, when not in use, or on the nearby dirt lot, referred to as the "Marion Lot," with an option to provide a shuttle service; b) the reserved use of parking spaces in the Central Library parking lot on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings during hours where Central Library is closed; c)the reserved use of parking spaces in the Gothard Parking lot for disabled placard only parking. 10. PAID PARKING Licensee shall charge a fee of at least$10 per space for parking and may charge a fee of up to $20 per space for parking in this reserved area,unless a different amount is agreed by Licensee and City in writing Parking fees collected in the areas shall be split between City and Licensee, with 60%payable to City and 40%payable to Licensee with the City to provide parking attendant staffing. This revenue sharing between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term (including extensions and/or options) of this Agreement. Where applicable, the proceeds for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks (14 days) after the close of each month in which Events occur and shall be placed in an account specifically for capital improvement projects to directly benefit Central Library and Central Park, including the restoration of the Library fountains and park irrigation systems. 11. TICKET SALES A "Ticket" as define above, is sold, one to each person, for attendance of an Event. All - - Ticket sales gross revenue for admission to, attendance of, viewing of, or participation in, the Event, shall be split between City and Licensee. YEAR 1: In year one(1)of this Agreement, City shall receive$3 per Ticket for all Tickets sold,with no limit on number of Tickets sold or cap on revenue to City. YEAR 2: In year two (2) of this Agreement, City shall receive $5 per Ticket for all Tickets sold,with no limit on number of Tickets sold or cap on revenue to City. YEAR 3: In year three (3) of this Agreement, City shall receive $5 per Ticket for all Tickets sold,with no limit on number of Tickets sold or cap on revenue to City. 11.1 GROUPS: In the event Licensee has large group Events for organizations, corporations, or other groups, i.e., "non-individual" Ticket Sales type Events, the "Ticket Sales" for that Event will be measured by the number of people of the organization,corporation,or group, that is admitted to the Event such that the City still realizes a "per person" or "individual in attendance" benefit from each Event. 11.2 TIMING OF PAYMENT: This revenue split between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term (including extensions and/or options) of this Agreement. The proceeds for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks after the close of each month in which Events occurred and may be deposited by the City into the City's general fund and used for any purpose. 11.3 MINIMUM GUARANTEE: Licensee guarantees a minimum of$150,000 per year to the City in total revenue unless the agreement is terminated by either the City or 6 24-15263/357005 �� `/` 461 Licensee in accordance with the agreement. So,if Ticket Sales are less than expected,or the share of the City's portion of total, aggregate Event revenue falls below and annual total of$150,000 in any year,Licensee shall make up the difference for that year. 12. SPONSORSHIP REVENUE YEAR 1: In year one (1) of this Agreement, City shall receive 0%in Sponsorship Revenue. YEAR 2: In year two (2) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20% of all Sponsorship Revenue. YEAR 3: In year three (3) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20% of all Sponsorship Revenue This revenue split between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term (including extensions and/or options) of this Agreement. The proceeds for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks after the close of each month - in which Events occurred and may be deposited by the.City into the City's general fund and used for any purpose 13. FOOD AND BEVERAGE REVENUE YEAR 1: In year one (1) of this Agreement, City shall receive 0%of all Food and Beverage Revenue. YEAR 2: In year two (2) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20% net revenue for all Food and Beverage Revenue. YEAR 3: In year three (3) of this Agreement, City shall receive 20%net revenue for all Food and Beverage Revenue This revenue split between City and Licensee shall exist and not be modified throughout the Term(including extensions and/or options)of this Agreement.The proceeds. for City portion shall be paid to the City by Licensee within two weeks after the close of each month in which Events occurred and may be deposited by the City into the City's general fund and used for any purpose. 14. PAYMENTS TO CITY FROM EVENTS Licensee agrees to pay City within two weeks after the close of each month in which Events occurred the City's share of the proceeds as described in Sections 10 and 11 by way of money wire transfer to the City's account. The account information for wire transfers will be provided by the City to the Licensee by separate side letter. 15. SPECIAL BENEFITS Licensee agrees to provide 1,000 Event Tickets directly to local, Huntington Beach based charities each year. Licensee also agrees to promote and host a Special Library Event for the Anniversary of the Library on or near the anniversary of the Central Library. This Special Library Event will offer discounted Ticket Sales. 7 24-15263/357005 i Jk 462 Licensee agrees to provide production of the event and City will receive ticket revenue for 5 mutually agreeable days, off-peak (Mon-Thurs) performances. Event to receive Food and Beverage revenue during the five (5) days to help offset performance costs. 16. PROACTIVE ACCOUNTING REPORTING In the interest of full disclosure, transparency, and public interest, along with the actual payment of proceeds from Parking, Ticket Sales, and donated Tickets to the City as described in Sections 10, 11, and 13 above, Licensee shall submit to the City a written report of all/gross Parking, Ticket Sales, and total number of individuals in attendance of each Event and net remittance to the City. This reporting shall show calculations for proceeds apportionment among the City and Licensee,show amounts retained by Licensee,and show amounts remitted to the City, and include any donated Tickets. The form of this accounting can be by letter, email, or any other convenient form of communication so long as the parties agree it is an official record sufficient and reliable in form and substance to satisfy the requirements any applicable State standards for accounting and for any future/potential financial audit. 16.1 Auditing Requirements. Licensee shall comply throughout the term of the Agreement with any requested audit by either City or third party on behalf of City. 17. CERTAIN LICENSEE OBLIGATIONS 17.1 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Licensee shall comply throughout the term of the Agreement with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as all applicable rules and regulations established by City,both in effect as of the Effective Date and as both enacted and amended from time-to-time. This includes compliance with the American Disabilities Act, and any other federal, state and local law the governs art and/or entertainment events such as this on this scale. Accordingly, Licensee understands the need to procure and maintain at its cost, bathrooms, pedestrian pathways and access, and any other amenity required as a matter of law or common sense. 17.2 Environmental Review. The Event requires an environmental review and mitigation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). City reserves the right to require the application of appropriate mitigation measures to address potential environmental impacts that may be identified during the environmental review process. Licensee agrees to pay for the cost of any necessary environmental review as required by law and as required by the City for this Event unless the agreement is terminated by either the City or Licensee in accordance with the agreement. This City shall not contribute to any such review. Licensee agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall require City to exercise its legislative or police power, or to make any other approval, except as both authorized by law as well as consistent with the City's municipal and charter authority. 17.3 Taxes and Assessments. Licensee shall pay promptly and discharge all lawful taxes and assessments which may be levied by the federal, state, county, City or other tax levying body on any taxable interest of Licensee as well as all taxes and assessments on taxable personal property of whatever nature owned by Licensee and located on premises of the Event Premises, except for any real estate or similar land taxes applicable to the Event Premises itself 8 24-15263/357005 �: . i 463 Subject to the foregoing, Licensee shall promptly pay all excise, license and permit fees of whatever nature applicable to the operation of Licensee's business. 17.4 Event Participant Liability Waivers. Licensee shall ensure that each Event participant executes a hold harmless liability waiver, in a form acceptable to City (with City consent to not be unreasonably withheld), pursuant to which Event participant both assumes the risk of injury, damages, or death, as well as Event participant releases the City from all liability in connection with the Event. 17.5 Service Contractors. At least fifteen (15) business days prior to the commencement of the Event, Licensee shall submit to City a written list of all persons or entities who will provide a service to or on behalf of Licensee for such Event. Licensee shall promptly update such written list and provide to City whenever there is a determination by Licensee additional persons or entities, not on the original list, will provide a service to or on behalf of Licensee for such Event. 17.6 Improvements and Safety Systems. Licensee shall design and construct such improvements and safety systems for the Event as may be required by governmental authorities in accordance with plans and specifications approved by such authorities and the City. 17.7 Evacuation and Safety Plan. Licensee shall develop an Evacuation and Safety plan for the Event that addresses and mitigates any potential threats to public safety that may reasonably arise from the conduct of the Event, that shall be approved by the City no later than ten(10) days prior to the commencement of any Event. 17.8 Limited License to Use Event Branding.Licensee hereby grants to City the limited, non-assignable, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive license to use and deploy, during the term,Branding for an Event, in all reasonable forms for advertising and marketing,but only to the extent related to promotion of the Event, and subject in each instance to Licensee's prior written approval,which will not be unreasonably withheld by Licensee. 17.9 Operations,Equipment and Personnel. Except as otherwise provided for by this Agreement or an applicable Specific Events Permits, Licensee shall provide for (or cause to be provided) all Event-related equipment, supplies, personnel (including volunteers), training of personnel (including volunteers), Event manuals/programs, Event set-up and tear down, and all other technical and operational aspects of the Event. 17.10 Event Costs. Except as otherwise provided for by this Agreement or an applicable Specific Events Permits,Licensee shall be solely responsible for all expenses and costs necessary for the promotion,management and operation of the Event. 17.11 Local Suppliers. Licensee shall consider, to the best extent possible and in compliance with applicable laws, to use local suppliers for the promotion, management and operation of the Event, subject to production needs. 17.12 Local Accommodations.Licensee shall make reasonable efforts to both use properties located within the City of Huntington Beach, for Event-related accommodations needs, as to both it and all participants, exhibitors, attendees, and any other persons and organizations associated with the Event, subject to production needs. 9 24-15263/357005 \ F 464 17.13 Complimentary Sponsorship Package for City. Licensee shall provide City with a sponsorship benefits package(for use solely by City)to include, but not be limited to: 17.13.1 Prominent space for City usage from which City may promote City, such as a booth at a prime Event location; and 17.13.2 Prominent signage (advertising only the City) at certain mutually approved prime locations throughout the Event Premises; and, 17.13.3 Prominent placement of City's logo on selected public Event- related printed and internet material produced by Licensee,together with that of other sponsors or partners of the Event; and, 17.13.4 Prominent placement of City's logo and City's banner advertisements on all Event websites managed or controlled by Licensee, together with that of other sponsors or partners of the Event. City advertising material shall be provided by City to Licensee and use as-provided shall not be unreasonably withheld. 17.14 Complimentary Hospitality Package for City. Licensee shall provide City with a hospitality package (for use solely by City) to include 400 complimentary VIP sponsor _ hospitality passes for the Event per year for use by City's employees and representatives, which passes grant access to Event VIP/priority seating areas. 18. LICENSE PAYMENT In consideration of the License granted to Licensee herein, Licensee shall pay to City a one-time license fee of Fifteen Thousand US Dollars ($15,000.00). Should City and Licensee mutually decide to exercise the one(1)year extension as outlined in Section 4 "Term" above, the fee for the extension shall be an additional Ten Thousand US Dollars ($10,000.00) and the City's revised share for all Event ticket sales into the future will be $5 per ticket. There shall be no other form of consideration or payment to City, and all revenues derived from the Event, except for parking fees and ticket sales as described in Section 10 and 11 above, shall belong to Licensee exclusively. The Payment described herein is for the License granted to Licensee only. Licensee remains responsible for the payment of all taxes and charges related to Licensee's use of the Licensed Premises, including but not limited to, the collection and payment of sales tax related to Licensee's sale of merchandising products and food on the Licensed Premises during the presentation of the Event. 19. EVENT PREMISES KEPT SAFE At all times the Event Premises is under control of the Licensee for the Season, and specifically during the periods immediately before, during, and after the Events series takes place, the Licensee shall, and hereby does guarantee that, the Event Premises will be safe; it will be suitable such that even when the Event Premises is set up,but not in active use,accessible portions, if any,will be safe for pedestrians,animals,children on bicycles or any other device,and any other being to enter, traverse, and use in a foreseeable way without harm, or even a slight risk of harm, io 24-15263/357005 F 7r9r' 465 to themselves. As such,Licensee assumes the role and responsibility herein to take any corrective measures necessary to make any and all conditions of the Event Premises safe for use during Events and when Events are not taking place. Additionally, it is the responsibility and role of the Licensee to ensure the security, storage, and delivery of the City's portion of the Ticket Sales referenced in Section 11. 20. HOLD HARMLESS: IDEMNIFICATION AND DEFENSE Event: Licensee hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, litigation, damages, losses, expenses,judgments, demands and defense costs,and consequential damage or liability of any kind or nature,however caused,including those resulting from death or injury to attendees or patrons of the Event,or City or Licensee's employees and damage to City or Licensee's property arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations or operations herein undertaken by Licensee, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Licensee, any subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, including but not limited to concurrent active or passive negligence, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. Non-Event: Licensee also hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City,its officers,elected or appointed officials,employees,agents,and volunteers from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, litigation, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs, and consequential damage or liability of any kind or nature, however caused, including those resulting from any death or injury to individual on or near the Event Premises when Events are not taking place, or any private property or real property near or adjacent to the Event Premises when Events are not taking place, or City or Licensee's employees and damage to City or Licensee's property arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations or operations herein undertaken by Licensee, caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of the Licensee, any subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, including but not limited to concurrent active or passive negligence, except where caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City. Environmental: Licensee and City agree to a limited joint defense to any legal challenges to this License under the City's Measure C or the Environmental Review and reporting conducted and performed by ESA pursuant to CEQA. That limited joint defense includes that Licensee shall make its selection of legal counsel of its choice and fully fund and bear any/all costs and expenses related to its legal counsel or defense of such legal actions. The City will undertake to join the defense with its attorney resources. The City will cooperate and support Licensee in defense of any legal challenge to this License under the City's Measure C or the Environmental Review pursuant to CEQA. As part of the defense,Licensee hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City,its officers,elected or appointed officials,employees,and agents from and against any and all claims, lawsuits, litigation, damages, losses, expenses,judgments, demands and defense costs, and conseq uential damage or liability of any kind or nature, however caused, including those resulting from any challenge brought by any party the License under the City's Measure C or the Environmental Review and reporting conducted and performed by ESA pursuant to CEQA.Notwithstanding the foregoing,Licensee may instead elect to terminate this Agreement 11 24-15263/357005 rD75), it's\F 466 in the event of any legal challenges to this License under the City's Measure C or.the Environmental Review and reporting conducted and performed by ESA pursuant to CEQA. Except for any legal challenges as described in the preceding paragraph, Licensee will conduct all defenses at its sole cost and expense and City shall approve selection of Licensee's counsel. This indemnity and defense obligation shall apply to all claims and liability, including but not limited to, any claims related to whether the approval of the Event by City, or the Event itself, is in compliance with applicable federal,state and local laws,and regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Licensee. 21. WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1861, Licensee acknowledges awareness of Section 3700 et seq. of this Code,which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation; Licensee covenants that it will comply with such provisions prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder. Licensee shall obtain and furnish to City workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance in an amount of not less than the State statutory limits. Licensee shall require all subcontractors to provide such workers' compensation and employer's liability insurance for all the subcontractors'employees. Licensee shall furnish to City a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance and Licensee shall similarly require all subcontractors to waive subrogation. • 22. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE In addition to the Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance and Licensee's covenant to defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, Licensee shall obtain and furnish to City, a policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage covering the use of the Licensed Premises. This policy shall indemnify Licensee, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims arising out of or in connection with the use of the Licensed Premises, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit,the aggregate limit must be no less than One Million Dollars($1,000,000) for the use of the Licensed Premises. This policy shall name City,its officers,elected or appointed officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the use of the Licensed Premises shall be deemed excess coverage and that Licensee's insurance shall be primary. Under no circumstances shall said above-mentioned insurance contain a self- insured retention, or a"deductible" or any other similar form of limitation on the required coverage. 12 24-15263/357005 467 23. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE Licensee shall obtain and furnish to City an automotive liability insurance policy covering the use of the Licensed Premises by it hereunder.This policy shall provide coverage for Licensee's automotive liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars($1,000,000.00)per occurrence and a separate"Additional Insured Endorsement"page listing both the policy number and naming the "City of Huntington Beach,its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers" as additional insured on the endorsement. The above-mentioned insurance shall not contain a self-insured retention, "deductible" or any similar form of limitation on the required coverage except with the express written consent of City. 24. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 24.1 Prior to any use of the Licensed Premises hereunder,Licensee shall furnish to City a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement;the certificate shall: 24.1.1 provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; 24.1.2 state that the policy is currently in force; and 24.1.3 promise that such policy shall not be suspended,voided or canceled by either party,reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty(30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. 24.2 Licensee shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force during the entire Term of this License, including any extensions of the Term as provided herein. 24.3 This requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from Licensee's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. City or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. Licensee shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 25. SIGNS,BANNERS, &MARKETING 25.1 Following review and approval by City,Licensee may erect,at its own cost and expense, its own signs and banners on the Licensed Premises. Licensee shall bear the cost of the installation, repair,maintenance and removal of its own signs and banners. 25.2 Pursuant to Section 13, Licensee shall offer a special event to benefit the Library in collaboration with City. The City shall designate various non-profit organizations to be entered into a lottery to be chosen as the beneficiary of the tickets referred to in Section 13. 25.3 City shall make available street banners and pennant locations throughout the City, when possible, at no additional cost to Licensee. 25.4 City shall assist Licensee with marketing on City social media pages, newsletters, and website. 13 24-15263/357005 i:_ \S. iL 468 26. COMPLIANCE WITH MEASURE C Licensee shall not use the Licensed Premises for any purpose that is prohibited by any law, statute, ordinance or governmental rule or regulation now in force, or that may be enacted or promulgated in the future. In no event shall Licensee build any permanent structure anywhere in Central Park or within the Event Premises. Only temporary structures that can be removed within one week,while leaving the subject property in the same condition it was in prior to the placement of the structure, may be erected or placed by Licensee in accordance with this Agreement within the Event Premises. 27. TERMINATION AND SUSPENSION City shall be entitled to immediately terminate this License Agreement in case of failure by Licensee to comply with the payment of the License Fee. In case of failure by Licensee to comply with any other terms or conditions of this License Agreement, City will first send notice to cure such default within thirty (30) days, except in case of emergency or for any default that cannot be reasonably be resolved within such delay, in which case it shall provide a reasonable delay to cure.In the event Licensee does not remedy such default or take arrangement with City to remedy same in a delay agreed by the parties for any default that cannot be reasonably remedied within(30)days,City shall be able to pursue all available remedies under law, including specific performance, but excluding extra judicial termination. Licensee may terminate, without cause, within thirty (30) days after each year for year 2 and/or year 3. Licensee may not perform the event in any other Orange County location during year 2 or year 3. City may,without cause,terminate by providing thirty(30)days notice after the first year. Licensee to have the right to perform the event in any location, including Orange County. 27.1 Licensee shall be entitled to terminate this License Agreement upon the occurrence of any of the following events provided that the Licensee has timely applied for the required permits, licenses, authorizations, or consents for use of the Licensed Premises: 27.1.1 the failure by Licensee to obtain any of the required permits, licenses, authorizations or consents for the use of the Licensed Premises on conditions acceptable to Licensee,'in which case this License Agreement may be terminated by Licensee upon simple notice, and each party shall be discharged from any liability or obligation towards the other. 27.1.2 the failure by the City to comply with or perform any term,condition or covenant and to cure such event within thirty (30) days after Licensee gives the City written notice of such default and opportunity to cure to City, in which case Licensee shall be able to pursue all available remedies under law. 27.2 Should Licensee not be able to present the Event on the Licensed Premises , at any time during the Term for any reason at its discretion, Licensee will have the option to terminate this License Agreement upon thirty (30) day notice. Licensee shall return the Licensed 14 24-15263/357005 : 3 ;, r 469 Premises. to City pursuant to the terms of this License Agreement, and each party shall be discharged from any further liability or obligation towards the other. 28. FORCE MAJUERE In the event either Party is prevented from performing any of its obligations, under either this Agreement, by reason of any event outside of such Party's control, including, without limitation, fire,weather,unsafe conditions, volcano, explosion, flood, landslide, epidemic, acts of nature, war, terrorism, or other hostilities, strike, civil commotion, domestic or foreign governmental acts,orders,any court order stopping or preventing the Event,or regulations("Force Majeure Event"),then such obligations of such Party during the duration of such Force Majeure Event, and for a reasonable time thereafter, will be suspended. In the case of cancellation of the Event due to a Force Majeure Event,the Parties agree to negotiate a date to reschedule such Event if practicable. If such canceled Event cannot reasonably be rescheduled or relocated within the City, neither Party shall be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement solely because of such cancellation. Neither any such cancellation, rescheduling, or relocation, nor the inability to reschedule or relocate, will,by itself, cause this Agreement to terminate. 29. RESTORE LICENSED PREMISES END OF SEASON: At the end of the Seasonal timeframe for Event set up, production, and take-down,Licensee shall remove from the Licensed Premises all equipment,signs,structures, objects, and other personal property placed on the Licensed Premises and return the Licensed Premises to the City restored to the Premises natural state and condition. END OF TERM: At the end of the Term or upon earlier termination of this License Agreement, Licensee shall remove from the Licensed Premises all equipment, signs, and other personal property placed by it on the Licensed Premises and return the Licensed Premises to the City restored to the Premises natural state and condition. The Licensee may leave any pre-agreed materials used on the Licensed Premises or otherwise agreed to by City,which the Licensee shall be entitled to leave on the Licensed Premises at the end of the Term. On the last day of the Term (or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practical), a duly authorized representative of the City and of Licensee shall together inspect the Licensed Premises to evaluate the state of the Licensed Premises.If the City is satisfied with the return condition of the Licensed Premises,the City agrees to sign the release form attached hereto as Exhibit"B." Licensee shall not be liable for any pre-existing condition; however, Licensee shall be liable for any damage occurring from the use of the Licensed Premises for the scope of the Event. Licensee shall return at the end of Term and/or end of Season the Licensed Premises in the condition in which it was received at the beginning of the Term; a restoration fee of $50,000 annually to be paid by Licensee to City for the restoration of turf, foliage and other landscape impacts. The Licensee will allow City to perform essential landscaping and maintenance on City trees, foliage, and water systems with reasonable written notice. 30. ASSIGNMENT This License is personal to Licensee, and Licensee shall have no right to assign its rights hereunder or to sublicense the Licensed Premises. 15 24-15263/357005 J\ a. 470 31. NOTICES All notices or demands to be given by either Party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given either when delivered in person or two (2) days after being sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, via email, or by a national air courier company that provides signature verification of delivery to recipient, to the respective Parties at the addresses provided in this Section of this Agreement. The address to which any notice or demand may be given to either Party may be changed from time to time by written notice to the other. Notice Address: To City—addressed to each: To Licensee: City Manager, City Attorney& City Clerk _ 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 32. APPLICABLE LAW. The existence, validity, and construction of this Agreement shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the state of California without reference to its conflicts of laws or principles; provided, that(i) any provision which may be held invalid shall be ineffective only to the extent of such invalidity and shall not invalidate any of the remaining provisions, (ii) this License Agreement shall not be construed as creating either a Licenseeship, an agency or an employment relationship between the Parties,and(iii)the failure of any Party to insist at any time upon the strict performance of any provision or to act upon any right or remedy available to such Party, whether under the License Agreement or as a matter of law, shall not be interpreted as a waiver or a relinquishment of any such right or remedy unless specifically expressed in writing, signed by such Party and neither the receipt, acceptance nor application of any payment shall, without more, constitute such a writing. 33. MUNICIPAL POWERS. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a limitation upon the powers and authority of City as a chartered city of the State of California. 34. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES. The rights and remedies provided by this Agreement are given in addition to any other rights and remedies either Party may have by law, statute, ordinance or otherwise. All such rights and remedies are intended to be cumulative,and the use of any one right or remedy by either Party shall not preclude or waive its right to any or all other rights or remedies. 35. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. 16 24-15263/357005 e A'r7-:; 471 Time is of the essence in the performance of each and every provision contained within this Agreement. 36. DEFAULT. Upon default by Licensee in performance of any of the terms and conditions required by this Agreement, City may give notice to Licensee and the reasons for the default. The written notice shall include the timeframe in which Licensee may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively (thirty (30) business days, but may be extended, or reduced in case of emergency, if circumstances warrant, as determined by City acting reasonably. Circumstances warranting a reduced timeframe to cure include, but are not limited to, when a default involves either public safety or immediate waste or damage to City property. If Licensee does not cure the default by conclusion of noticed timeframe, then notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, City may terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part at City's sole discretion, upon written notice to Licensee,without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Licensee's - default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement. 36.1 REMOVAL OF PROPERTY: In any event that Licensee leaves or allows any of its property to remain in any part of the Central Park area, including within the Event Premises,beyond the license permissions of this Agreement and without written consent of the City,the City shall be entitled to remove Licensee's property with all costs of such removal to Licensee. Reimbursement of such costs to City by Licensee shall occur within thirty(30) days of City notification to Licensee. 37. NO ORAL OR IMPLIED WAIVERS OR MODIFICATIONS. If either Party fails to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or any rights hereunder or fails to exercise any election provided in this Agreement, it will not be considered to be a waiver of those provisions, rights or elections or in any way affect the validity of this Agreement. The failure of either Party to exercise any of these provisions, rights or elections will not preclude or prejudice such Party from later enforcing or exercising the same or any other provisions, rights or elections which it may have under this Agreement. No waiver will be of any force or effect unless set forth in a writing signed by the Party whose right is being waived.Subject to the immediately preceding sentence, no modifications to this Agreement will be binding upon the Parties unless modified, amended, cancelled,renewed, or extended in a writing signed by both Parties. 38. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement (including all exhibits hereto) sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and,with respect to such subject matter, supersedes and replaces all prior agreements, arrangements and understandings,written or oral, between the Parties. Except as may be expressly set forth herein, there are no promises, conditions, representations, understanding, interpretations or terms of any kind as conditions or inducement to the execution hereof or in effect between the Parties. 39. INTERPRETATION. 17 24-15263/357005 472 The section headings included in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and will not affect or be utilized in construing or interpreting this Agreement. If any term, clause or provision hereof is held invalid or unenforceable by an arbitrator or a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity will not affect the validity or operation of any other term, clause or provision and such invalid term, clause, or provision will be deemed to be severed from this Agreement.Neither this Agreement nor any provision herein will be construed in favor or against either Party based on which Party drafted this Agreement or such provision. 40. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Licensee, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Licensee or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 41. MISCELLANEOUS 41.1 Authority: City represents and warrants that (i) it has the right, power and authority to enter into and execute the present Agreement without additional formality, and (ii) it is not party to any agreement which prohibits the City from entering into this Agreement.Licensee represents that it has the necessary rights,power and authority to enter into and execute the present _ Agreement. 41.2 Waiver: No waiver, whether written or tacit, of any remedy or provisions of the present Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other provision hereof or a permanent waiver of the provision concerned, unless otherwise stated in writing by the party to be bound thereby. 41.3 Relationship: The Parties are acting herein solely as independent contractors.Nothing herein contained will create or be construed as creating a Licenseeship,joint venture, or agency relationship between the Parties. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that it neither has nor will give the appearance or impression of having any legal authority to bind or commit the other Party in any way. Each Party will be solely responsible for all wages, income taxes, worker's compensation, and any other requirements for all personnel it supplies in connection with this Agreement. 41.4 Intellectual Property: It is understood that all commercial, intellectual property or other rights related to the Event or any of Licensee's operations and projects shall belong to Licensee exclusively. Nothing in this Agreement or during its application shall be construed as providing to City any commercial, intellectual property or other rights related to the Event or any of Licensee's operations and projects. For greater certainty and without limitation, all intellectual property rights of any nature related to the Event or any of Licensee's operations and projects or any idea or concept discussed or shared in connection therewith between the parties shall belong to Licensee exclusively. 41.5 Accessory Agreement and Documents: Each of the parties shall, at the request of the other, execute all such agreements, instruments and documents as shall be reasonably necessary to give effect to the present Agreement or to facilitate its application and execution. Upon approval as to form by the City Attorney, City's Director of Community and 18 24-15263/357005 )) ' 1 t `tR � 473 Library Services is hereby authorized to execute such accessory agreements and documents on City's behalf. 41.6 Counterparts: The present agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts and all such executed counterparts shall constitute one(1)Agreement binding on all of the Parties in spite of the fact that all of the Parties have not signed the same counterpart. This Agreement may be delivered via facsimile transmission or in electronic "pdf' or similar format with the same force and effect as if originally executed copies of it were delivered to all Parties. 41.7 Reasonableness: The Parties shall at all times act prudently, fairly, equitably, reasonably, promptly and in good faith in dealing with one another under this Agreement and shall not unreasonably withhold or delay any consents, approvals, authorizations, exercises of discretion, exercises of judgment or the like provided in this Agreement. 41.8 Headings and Gender: The section headings are for convenience only and shall have no legal significance. The masculine, feminine or neuter gender, and the singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the others whenever the context so indicates or requires. The term"including" shall be deemed to mean"including, but not by way of limitation. 41.9 Cumulative Remedies: The various rights, options, elections, powers and remedies contained in this Agreement shall be construed as cumulative, and no one of them shall be exclusive of any of the others or of any other legal or equitable remedy which either Party might otherwise have in the event of a breach or default in the terms of this Agreement. The exercise of one right or remedy by such Party shall not impair its right to any other right or remedy until all obligations imposed on the other Party have been fully performed. 41.10 Attorneys' Fees: In the event of litigation or other proceeding brought to enforce this License Agreement, each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. The prevailing party will not be entitled to recover its attorneys'fees,costs,and expenses in connection with such litigation or other proceeding from the other party. REST OF PAGE NOT USED 19 24-15263/357005 I1 w^^ d� 474 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties have executed this License Agreement by and through their authorized officers on , 2024. LICENSEE: CITY: By: Print name: Mayor Its: ATTEST: By: Print name: Its: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Community and Library Services REVIEWED AND APPROVED: Interim City Manager 20 24-15263/357005 ifix 7;7 475 EXHIBIT "A" SITE PLAN OF LICENSED PREMISES • 21 24-15263/357005 fjP4i,• 476 EXHIBIT "B" FORM OF RELEASE I,the undersigned, a duly authorized representative of City, acknowledge having inspected the site for which a License Agreement was issued(the "Licensed Premises")by City for the benefit of Licensee, and declare that the Licensed Premises has been returned to the City in a satisfactorily condition in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Therefore, the City hereby waives all claims it may have against Licensee in respect to the return condition of the Licensed Premises. By: Print name: Title: Date: 22 24-15263/357005 i'' 477 Final ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR MASTER PLAN OF RECREATION USES FOR CENTRAL PARK, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA - SYMPHONY OF THE FLOWERS PROJECT State Clearinghouse #97091007 Prepared for December 2024 City of Huntington Beach ESA o0 5 478 479 • Final ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR MASTER PLAN OF RECREATION USES FOR CENTRAL PARK, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA - SYMPHONY OF THE FLOWERS PROJECT State Clearinghouse #97091007 Prepared for December 2024 City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 420 Exchsinge Fr— ESuite260 Suite 50 SA Irvine,CA 92602 948.753.7001 esaseoc.com Manta Pasadena San Francisco Bend Pensacola San Jose Irvine Petaluma Santa Barbara Los Angeles Portland Sarasota Mobile Rancho Cucamonga Seattle Oakland Sacramento Tampa Orlando San Diego Thousand Oaks Palm Beach County 480 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABIUTY I ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions.ESA Is a registered asswssor with the California Climate Action Registry,a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry.ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S.Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change(BC3).Internally,ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations.This document was produced using recycled paper. 481 TABLE OF CONTENTS Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California — Symphony of the Flowers Project Page Introduction 1 CEQA Authority for an EIR Addendum 1 Project Description 3 Project Location 3 Existing Site Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses 3 Land Use and Zoning Designations 3 Project Objectives and Community Benefits 3 Project Characteristics 6 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 14 Effects Found Not to be Significant 14 CEQA Topics Evaluated in Detail 20 Conclusions Regarding Addendum as an Appropriate Mechanism 38 List of Preparers 39 References Cited 40 Symphony of the Flowers Project I ESA I D202300046 Addendum to FMEIR December2024 482 Contents Figures Figure 1 Regional Map 4 Figure 2 Existing Site Vicinity Map 5 Figure 3 Site Plan 7 Figure 4 Water Basin 8 Figure 5a Speaker Location 10 Figure 5b Bleacher Sound Dispersion 11 Figure 6 Site Evacuation Plan 13 Figure 7 Natural Communities and Land Cover Types 24 Figure 8 Symphony of Flowers Noise Model 34 Figure 9 Ambient Noise Monitoring 35 Appendices A. Ambient Noise Measurement Data B. Transportation Assessment Symphony of the Flowers Project II ESA/D202300046 Addendum to FMEIR December2024 483 Acronyms and Other Abbreviations Abbreviation Definition AB 52 Assembly Bill 52 ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BCER Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve BSA Biological Study Area CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of Huntington Beach CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database CNPS California Native Plant Society CO carbon monoxide County Orange County dB decibels dBA A-weighted decibel DOC California Department of Conservation ESA Environmental Science Associates FMEIR Final Master Environmental Impact Report GHG greenhouse gas HBFD Huntington Beach Fire Department HBPD Huntington Beach Police Department HCP Habitat Conservation Plan IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation kwh kilowatt-hour LED light-emitting diode Leq Equivalent Continuous Sound Pressure Level Master Plan Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Hunting Central Park MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MRZ Mineral Resource Zone NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan Symphony of the Flowers Project III ESA/D202300046 Addendum to FMEIR December 2024 484 Acronyms and Other Abbreviations Abbreviation Definition NOx nitrogen oxides NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRCS Natural Resource Conservation Service NWI National Wetland Inventory' OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OS-P Open Space-Park OS-PR Open Space-Parks and Recreation Subdistrict Pacific Coast Highway State Route 1 • Park Central Park East PM10 respirable particulate matter PM2.5 fine particulate matter Project Symphony of Flowers RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District Show Symphony of Flowers SOx sulfur oxides SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey VMT vehicle miles traveled VOC volatile organic compounds WQMP Water Quality Management Plan Symphony of the Flowers Project IV ESA/D202300046 Addendum to FMEIR December2024 485 ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR MASTER PLAN OF RECREATION USES FOR CENTRAL PARK, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA - SYMPHONY OF THE FLOWERS PROJECT Addendum EIR Introduction This document is an Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report(FMEIR)for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California(Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq.),this Addendum to the EIR analyzes the Symphony of Flowers(or Project or Show) (defined below) and demonstrates the Symphony of the Flowers does not meet the standards for a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163.Although the Symphony of the Flowers wasn't originally contemplated in the Certified 1999 FMEIR,the Project instead qualifies for use of an Addendum pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 as the Project would not result in any new significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts or introduce new mitigation measures. CEQA Authority for an EIR Addendum CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines establish the type of environmental documentation that is required when changes to a project occur after an EIR is certified. Section 15164(a)states that: The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to apreviously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, once an EIR has been certified, no subsequent or supplemental EIR shall be prepared for a project unless the lead agency determines that one or more of the following occurs: Symphony of the Flowers Project I ESA/D202300046 Addendum to FMEIR December2024 486 Introduction 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance,which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted,shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Likewise,California Public Resources Code Section 21166 states that unless one or more of the following events occur,no Supplemental or Subsequent EIR shall be required by the lead agency or by any responsible agency: (a) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report; (b) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the environmental impact report; or (c) New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the environmental impact report was certified as complete,becomes available. As demonstrated by the analysis in this document,the Symphony of Flowers would not result in any new significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts. Rather, all of the impacts associated with the Symphony of Flowers are within the envelope of impacts addressed in the Certified 1999 FMEIR and do not constitute new or substantially increased significant impacts. Therefore,the Symphony of Flowers does not meet the criteria for a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163. Symphony of the Flowers Project 2 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 487 Project Description Project Description Project Location Regionally,the Symphony of Flowers is located in the City of Huntington Beach(City),which is in coastal Orange County (County) in Southern California; refer to Figure 1,Regional Map. Locally, the Project is located within the Huntington Central Park, which is the largest City-owned park in the County with approximately 350 acres of land. Huntington Central Park is comprised of open grass fields, paved pathways for walking and biking, exercise stations, dirt trails meandering to open fields and nature areas, two lakes, playgrounds and picnic areas. Huntington Central Park is comprised of both Central Park West and Central Park East. Central Park West includes the Shipley Nature Center, Huntington Central Park Equestrian Center,Lake Huntington,Huntington Dog Park,Huntington Beach Disc Golf Course,the Senior Center,and Kathy May's Lakeview Café.Central Park East includes the Huntington Beach Central Library, Children's Library, Library Theater, Central Park Amphitheater, Central Park Bandstand, Huntington Beach Central Park Sports Complex, Adventure Playground, Talbert Lake, Secret Garden, Butterfly Garden,and Park Bench Café.Specifically,the Project is located within the northeastern portion of Central Park East(Project Site or Park),located at 18002 Goldenwest Drive,Huntington Beach,CA;refer to Figure 2,Existing Site Vicinity Map. Existing Site Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The Project Site primarily consists of a grass surface, trees, and paved pathways. Land uses surrounding the Project Site comprise of the City's Park,Tree,and Landscape Maintenance Division office and facilities immediately adjacent to the north; additional park space,parking, Gothard Street,and commercial uses to the east; additional park space,the Central Park Amphitheater,Adventure Playground, and industrial uses to the south;and additional park space,Talbert Lake, Goldenwest Street,and residential uses to the west. Land Use and Zoning Designations According to the City's General Plan Land Use Plan,the Project Site is located within the Open Space-Park (OS-P)land use designation.The Park designation provides for public parks and recreational facilities and supporting ancillary uses (i.e., maintenance equipment storage). According to the City's Zoning Map,the Project Site is located within the Open Space-Parks and Recreation Subdistrict (OS-PR). This district provides areas for public or private use and areas for preservation and enhancement. Project Objectives and Community Benefits • Create temporary local jobs up to approximately 50 employees for Project operations and up to approximately 20 to 50 employees for Show set up and Show breakdown and generate additional positive economic impacts for the City as a result of spending by visiting Show attendees. • Provide a family-oriented safe,fun,and entertaining experience for all communities and age groups. • Create a show that integrates the park setting and is sensitive to the existing plant and wildlife resources within and adjacent to the Project Site. • Provide community outreach by working with local charitable organizations to arrange for opportunities for disadvantaged groups and/or families to attend and experience the Show. Symphony of the Flowers Project 3 ESA I D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 488 South Gate uPnte , Santa Fe Downey Springs ���, - IPA Lynwood 47 La Habra �� South Whittier llowbrook Norwalk East Rancho 1141A21 1 Dominguez T - 141111,4011iF Bellflower , Nite41111111 Cerritos Fullerton 1 - - Buena Park Lakewood La Palma Imo Lp_s Angeles v .0 m Hawaiian:' Anaheim Gardens Bail Ro Los Alamitos Signal Hill Orange Long Beach Garden Grove Naval Weapons Westminster Station Seal Beach Santa Ana Tustin Sunset Beach Fountain valley Project Site 10 Irvine — Orange ,I: Huntington Costa Mesa Beach x e-- z L Newport Beach nsbn ' San n Joaquin Hills Q 3'. Lag una Beac a, t4£ a L.;,0. 5 s O Miles O Project Site a' SOURCE:Esri,2023;ESA,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 1 Regional Map r ESA ....vi 489 1 Y iitesszterettit #I z a44t �:., d+ 3 t , '� q�= *ar t ....� Ilit a"• • , ..4 � mo . � .iii , , _:: '4 -''' 1- k� ar , 7 q T '*: '16:; slater L i € .' :::'1, em w» h7`°® n as, :..:-.1-_,.....::_'*,.":'' 44.1.141 '+ t ' u t .....i '"< ae Ave _ yt �a ,,,* z y � Huntington"Centr �` ParkEast a a f fl i a N O 0 I Talbert Lake , u - e . • Hun6ngton Bz, . ' _'I 111111111 # Hun -aton Beet" Oil Cyst° al Library Theater �4 Talbert Ave O0 250 " ' - . , �f Feet . .. � 7ymphPornOyjeoCtf Sitec. SOURCE.Esn,2023;ESA,2024 Huntington Beach Flowers Figure 2 Existing Site Vicinity Map r ESA 490 Project Description • Continue to provide a gathering place where locals and visitors can come together to enjoy a temporary multi-media light show choregraphed to symphony music. • Provide increased visibility and visitor use for a portion of Central Park East during off peak hours (after dusk). • Support and enhance the arts in the City of Huntington Beach by offering a world class arts presentation. Project Characteristics The Symphony of the Flowers includes a temporary multi-media show comprised of over 100,000 luminous flowers including roses,tulips,and lilies and over 500,000 light-emitting diode(LED)lights choregraphed to symphony music viewed from temporary bleachers. Following the Show, an optional self-guided interactive walking tour through designated pathways along the field of flowers is provided allowing visitors to engage with attractions and art installations within the Project Site;refer to Figure 3,Site Plan. Temporary structures and features of the Project include bleachers, a box-office, concessions (including beverages, light snacks, and merchandise [i.e., no meals or table service]), show controls, restrooms, pathways, lighting and sound equipment, luminous flowers, and a water fountain/basin. The aluminum bleachers are installed above ground and can accommodate up to 2,062 spectators within an area of approximately 20,000 square feet.The concessions and show controls consist in sea containers of 40'x 8.5' while the box-office is 20'x8.5'.The temporary structures would be installed by two telehandler lifts. The Project Site provides a VIP terrace gathering area for all ticket holders to temporarily enjoy their concessions prior to taking their seats within the bleacher area. The pathways are composed of removable interlocking tiles which are deposited above ground over geotextile. Once the pathways are installed, the walkways have an approximate width of 8' across. The luminous flowers contained in the field of flowers portion of the Project Site consist of energy efficient LED programmable multimedia pieces which are manually planted into the ground a few inches in depth. The field of flowers includes a lantern flower garden area comprised of large "human height" flowers, and a multimedia tunnel of lights spanning over 100 feet. The field of flowers represents the largest portion of the Project Site, approximately 200,000 square feet. Centrally located within the field of flowers is a water fountain installed above ground within a water basin; refer to Figure 4, Water Basin. The water basin is approximately 180 feet in length and approximately 50 feet in width. Lights are projected onto,the water fountain with a projection screen. Concrete blocks would be installed above ground to create the water basin. The Project Applicant would use recirculation pumps to prevent stagnant water and create the water screen effect.The water basin would be treated, as necessary, with natural algaecide safe for wildlife and subject to any recommendations and requirements of the City. The Project would not include any mechanical construction excavation,grading, or trenching activities and also would not remove,trim,or otherwise disturb any existing trees or habitat. Symphony of the Flowers Project 6 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December 2024 491 LEGENwE D 73 I. UM — iii't* '7,- ` ..- ''.1,'P'', ,..,5f$5 5'ft:-: .F . f 'EP "`""*"` ,,,,,4,:- ..', ro„,„ .z.„-,p,,t,,,:: fr -,., „-,1„ -, ., v € - 15 PAM `s m_ Try • r ,V4 4 t 4 w 1lflCI rsnra _ - I 1,1 iN1 i 1�� j AA 'YF39t NFj �Mf i w W - r /;I 4 4, - Y w r / ;.. . # eill ' ' E c y a ' . .,: jam.: e O 0 120 Feet 0 SOURCE:Becerra Strategies/Symphony of the Flowers,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 3 Site Plan Ir ESA 492 SIDE VIEW II I\il e{d. I III »1i ii , ' 1`� . r/f i 1 !OYlaAIN N N m TO PREVENT GROUND DISTURBANCE, i CONCRETE BLOCKS(2,5 X2.5 X6)OR 12'CONCRETE JERSEY BARRIERS F �, WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE r v'•, 3 BASIN TO CONTAIN THE WATER i�-- ;' i , g ` f, o .__eR44tt12 E to A' Fl SOURCE:Becerra Strategies/Symphony of the Flowers,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 4 Water Basin r ESA 493 Project Description Lighting The Project would use the existing lighting at Central Park East but would provide additional lighting throughout the Project Site comprised of artificial flowers which would be illuminated using LED lights within the internal structures, pathway lighting, lights to be projected onto the water fountain with a projection screen, lighting associated with the bleachers for seating, lighting for the concession stand and VIP terrace gathering area,and overnight security lighting.All Project lighting would be angled away from sensitive habitat areas, including riparian habitats (i.e., arroyo willow thickets, cattail marsh, Goodding's willow-red willow riparian woodland, and ornamental vegetation within the wetlands)potentially used by special-status riparian bird species(least Bell's vireo,tricolored blackbird,yellow-breasted chat,and yellow warbler) for nesting, and eucalyptus grove potentially used by overwintering monarch butterflies for roosting(Project Feature Biological Resources-1). Sound All Project speakers installed would be directed away from sensitive receptors,including the riparian habitat and eucalyptus groves(Project Feature Biological Resources-2).Approximately 12 speakers(6 stacks of 2 speakers) would be installed approximately 26 feet in front of the temporary bleachers. These speakers would include a speaker horizontal dispersion angle of 75 degrees and a speaker vertical dispersion angle of 15 degrees. Throughout the field of flowers, 64 speakers would be dispersed at approximately 25 feet from the pathways and spaced at approximately 50 feet apart. The speakers within the field of flowers would have a speaker dispersion angle of approximately 90 degrees. The speakers would project low-bass symphony music throughout the Project Site. Please refer to Figure 5a,Speaker Location and Figure 5b, Bleacher Sound Dispersion for the locations and sound dispersions of the speakers. Voluntary Project Features Related to Biological Resources Protection There are several voluntary project features the Project Applicant has proposed to protect biological resources. In addition to Project Feature Biological Resources-1 (related to lighting) and Project Feature Biological Resources-2 (related to sound), a qualified biologist will conduct nesting bird surveys within seven days prior to the start of the avian nesting season(generally defined as January 15 through September 15) (Project Feature Biological Resources-3). Further, pre-activity surveys for overwintering monarchs will be conducted prior to the start of the Project during overwintering season(October-February) within suitable eucalyptus grove habitat(Project Feature Biological Resources-4).Each of these project features are further discussed and described in the Biological Resources section of this Addendum. Hours of Operation and Schedule Operation of the Symphony of Flowers would maintain a flexible schedule to accommodate ticket demand and attendance, weather (i.e., no shows to occur on rainy days), and parking availability. The Show is planned to operate during evening hours (i.e., total darkness is required) from dusk to 11:00 P.M. during seasons of peak demand with up to 4 shows per evening. During times of lower demand, the Show is planned to operate from dusk to 9:00 P.M. or 10:00 P.M. with 2 to 3 shows per day. The Project would typically occur from Thursday through Sunday with up to 20 days of operation per month based on ticket sales for approximately 6 months. Shows have a duration of approximately 30 minutes while viewing from the temporary bleachers followed by approximately 30 minutes for the optional self-guided interactive walking tour through the field of flowers for a total expected visit time of approximately an hour. Visitors are expected to arrive approximately 15 to 30 minutes prior to the start of the Show and to depart within 15 to 60 minutes after the end of the Show depending on time spent on the walking tour. Symphony of the Flowers Project 9 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FM EIR December 2024 494 LEGEND t �• :. i € FOOTPATH a�-` B'TEMPORARY FENCE > +*• SECTIONAL ' `` - - TABLE+CHAIR a r a , D ♦ 4 of Q N i 2 9 1 7H SPEAKERS g 9 PA SPEAKER HORRONrAL D$SPEfiSION ANGLE:90' 0 o F 1, fn BLEACHER SPEAKERS SPEAKER HORIZONTAL DISPERSION ANGLE:75 8 O 0 120 N Feet a SOURCE:Becerra Strategies/Symphony of the Flowers,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 5a Speaker Location ►" ESA 495 UND DISPERSION SP*A1_IQR 2 /7_1Q 9NE STACKS:PP 4 SPEAKER_FRONT..Of THE B EACHE.R "77'.,-""' s; f I i /v i. Qi ,...,41--L-4 , 1 II y ,. r C1 � � f c7 i; m SOUND DISPERSION SPEAKER 1 E 0 g 1 0 SOURCE:Becerra Strategies/Symphony of the Flowers,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 5b Bleacher Sound Dispersion r ESA Al 496 Project Description Project Attendance The Symphony of Flowers is anticipated to attract an average of 900 visitors per show,approximately half of the maximum seating capacity. The Project Applicant anticipates the majority (approximately 70 percent) of visitors to originate from within a 30-mile radius of the City, with the remaining visitors (approximately 30 percent) to originate from beyond the 30-mile radius of the City. Given that the City frequently hosts a variety of special events and regularly draws regional tourists, it is likely that some visitors may attend the Show as part of other activities and events taking place within the City.In addition to the visitors of the Show, approximately 50 employees would be present each day of the Show for assistance with operations.Employees are anticipated to be onsite daily between the hours of 7:00 A.M.for Show preparation and up to midnight for Show conclusion. The Project Applicant is anticipated to hire employees locally. Access, Ingress/Egress, Parking Regional access to the Central Park East is provided by Interstate 405(San Diego Freeway), State Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway), and State Route 39 (Beach Boulevard). Local roadways providing access to Central Park East include Goldenwest Street, Gothard Street, Slater Avenue, Talbert Avenue, and Ellis Avenue. Huntington Beach Central Park East is surrounded by pedestrian facilities and Class II bicycle facilities that provide convenient access for park visitors. The Park is also served by Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) operated bus routes (i.e., Route 25, Route 76, and Route 29), which facilitate travel near the Project Site. During evenings of the Show, portions of the existing parking lots within Central Park East would be temporarily designated for Show parking to accommodate visitors arriving in private vehicles.To enhance accessibility and provide adequate circulation, the Project would allocate specific areas for rideshare, facilitating the use of rideshare services as an alternative mode of transportation. Further, visitors would have the option to arrive via public transit, bicycle, or on foot, supported by the existing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure of Central Park East,which connects to surrounding streets and the internal park trail network. The Show set up and breakdown would require approximately 20 to 50 daily employees with an expected 20 to 35 vehicles which would be parked offsite. The offsite parking would be located at the existing surface parking of the Frontier Communications building located on Slater Avenue adjacent to the Gothard Street and Slater Avenue intersection. Loading and unloading of mid-size equipment and concessions would occur at the existing parking lot along Gothard Street. Event Security and Site Evacuation The Project Applicant would provide private security The private security company would coordinate crowd control, internal and overnight security, venue safety, and emergency evacuation in coordination with the Huntington Beach Police Department(HBPD) and Huntington Beach Fire Department(HBFD). Within the Project's boundary, a site evacuation plan has been developed compliant with the City's Municipal Code fire and safety requirements;refer to Figure 6,Site Evacuation Plan.Although the Project would be enclosed by temporary security fencing, evacuation routes and exits would be maintained at multiple openings which align with existing pedestrian trails. Designated gathering points outside of the Project's immediate boundary would be maintained for evacuees and emergency personnel during emergencies. Symphony of the Flowers Project 12 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 497 LEGEND FT:'-'7,1 FOOTPATH 06,3 FLOWERS 8'TEMPORARY FENCE SECTIONAL TABLE+CHAIR a*R GATHERING POINT EMERGENCY Of VEHICLES ACCESS - r7 me EMERGENCY EXIT N rn �sr N 0 120 N Feet SOURCE:Becerra Strategies/Symphony of the Flowers,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 6 Site Evacuation Plan r ESA 498 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Show Set Up and Show Breakdown The Project requires up 4 to 6 weeks of set up and up to 4 weeks of breakdown. The Show set up would take place Monday through Saturday with weeks 1 through 3 occurring between 7:30 A.M. to 6:30 P.M., weeks 4 and 5 occurring between 7:30 A.M.and 10:30 P.M.,and week 6 occurring between 7:30 A.M.and 2:00 A.M., with only show programming occurring with no noise involved. The Show.breakdown would take place Monday through Saturday, from 7:30 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. Show set and breakdown operations would comprise of 20 to 50 daily employees. The flowers would be manually planted in the ground. The tip of the flower contains a spike ready to be planted.Manual electric battery drills would be applied when the soil is too solid to allow the spike to enter the ground. The pedestrian walkways and pond would be placed on the existing ground level.The Project would not include any mechanical construction excavation, grading,or trenching activities. The Project also would not remove,trim,or otherwise disturb any existing trees or habitat. Utilities • The Project would use existing connections and facilities. For the proposed water basin and fountain,the Project Applicant would bring in water to fill the basin.Portable restrooms and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) bathrooms would be provided onsite. Each of the single portable restrooms would sit in a containment tray on top of plywood (or other suitable flooring) and would not be within 50 feet of an existing storm drain. Wastewater generated from the Project is hauled off by the Project Applicant's vendors (i.e., portable bathrooms). Consistent with the City's franchise agreement, the Project Applicant would contract and coordinate refuse needs with the City's waste management provider,Republic Services. Republic Services would provide cardboard general waste and recycling bins with lids to be located at the Project Site including the reserved parking lot areas and would place dumpster bins in accordance with expected attendance. Dedicated food waste bins would be placed near the concessions. The Project Applicant would be responsible to replace all full trash can liners throughout the venue and to place the trash from the bins into the dumpsters to then be removed by Republic Services following the conclusion of the Show each evening.The estimated power consumption for the Project is 700-800 kilowatt-hour(kwh) per day.The Project would not use generators. Review and Approvals This Addendum is provided in association with the City Council's consideration of the Service Agreement for management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Effects Found Not to be Significant Following a review of the Certified 1999 FMEIR and the revised Project information, it was determined that only limited analysis was needed for the following resource areas: Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities and Service Systems,and Wildfire. Symphony of the Flowers Project 14 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 499 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Agriculture and Forestry Resources: The Project Site and surrounding areas do not contain agricultural uses or related operations and are not designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (California Department of Conservation [DOC], 2022). No portions of the Project Site or surrounding land uses are zoned for agricultural, and no nearby lands are enrolled under the Williamson Act. No forest land or land zoned for timberland is present within the Project Site or in the surrounding areas.The Project would not involve the conversion of farmland or forestland to other uses, either directly or indirectly.As such,no impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Air Quality: The Project Site is located within the South Coast Air Basin(SCAB). Air quality planning for the SCAB is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). The SCAQMD's 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) provides the strategy and the underlying technical analysis for how the region would meet that National Ambient Air Quality Standards(NAAQS) by the required dates and continue progress to achieve the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The Project is a temporary event and does not include residential or commercial development and would not generate a permanent increase in population or employment.Therefore,the Project would not conflict with growth projections in the AQMP.The Project would generate temporary emissions from the installation of the lighting and sound features,bleachers,and other support features.However,since the Project would not include any mechanical construction excavation,grading, or trenching activities and would not remove or trim any existing vegetation or disturb existing trees or habitat,heavy-duty construction equipment would not be used. Minor emissions would occur from workers commuting to the Project Site using automobiles and light-duty pick-up trucks. Operation of the Project would not include stationary sources of emissions. The Project lighting and sound features would be electric,and no fossil fuel combustion equipment would be used. Operation of the Project may result in an increase in vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled as a result of the Project compared to the prior and existing conditions.Up to approximately 300 trips per day are anticipated from primarily passenger vehicles. Occasional supply trucks would visit the Project Site to deliver day-to-day goods such as concessions;however,only a few supply truck trips would be required on a daily or weekly basis. Vehicle trips would generate mobile source emissions of ozone precursors, volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOx), respirable particulate matter(PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). However, emissions would be minimal given the low number of daily vehicle trips and emissions would be below SCAQMD thresholds of significance.As the Project would not include any substantial sources of on-site emissions,the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. No exceedances of CO have been recorded at monitoring stations in the SCAB in recent years and the SCAB is currently designated as a CO attainment area for both the CAAQS and NAAQS. The minimal number of vehicle trips would not cause or contribute to the formation of CO hotspots. Furthermore, the Project would not include any sources of substantial odors.Thus,the Project would result in less-than-significant impact to air quality. Cultural Resources: Any potential historical resources would not be impacted by the Project since only temporary event structures would be erected and removed following the end of the Project.In addition,the erection of the temporary event structures would be at or near-grade on the grass and no ground-disturbing activities would occur.The Project would not include any mechanical construction excavation,grading,or trenching activities that could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of historical resources, archaeological resources, or human remains. As such, no impact would occur, and no further analysis of this issue is required. Symphony of the Flowers Project 15 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR. December2024 500 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Energy: The Project does not include new permanent development. Instead, the Project consists of temporary event structures, such as lighting and sound equipment and bleachers. The temporary event structures would require the use of small hand-held power tools(some of which may be battery or electric powered)and two telehandler lifts and would require temporary power demand.However,since the Project would not require the construction of any new facilities, there would be no potential for mechanical construction or construction-related ground disturbance resulting in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Operation of the Project would not result in substantial net new energy demand from on-site activities.The Show would include the use of amplified speakers and pathway lighting. However, energy demand would be periodic and only required for the portion of the evening in which the Show would occur. The Project would require temporary energy for general lighting, which would be used for security and wayfinding and turned off each night at the close of each Show night.The temporary energy demand for hand-tools,speakers,lighting,and fountain would be used to operate the Symphony of the Flower, which,would achieve City objectives for the community that would not render the energy demand as wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Furthermore, the Project would use highly energy-efficient devices such as LEDs.Thus,the Project would not conflict with plans for energy efficiency or renewable energy. Operation of the Project may result in an increase in vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled as a result of the proposed Shows compared to the prior and existing conditions. Up to approximately 300 trips per day are anticipated from primarily passenger vehicles.Occasional supply trucks would visit the Project Site to deliver day-to-day goods such as concessions;however,only a few supply truck trips would be required on a daily or weekly basis.However,the increase in vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled and associated transportation fuel demand would be temporary and limited to the temporary Symphony of the Flowers. The Shows would be planned in such a manner to promote alternative transportation uses such as public transportation. The Project objectives include continuing to provide a family-oriented safe, fun, and entertaining experience; continuing to provide a gathering place where locals and visitors can come together to enjoy flowers, and music; and continuing to provide temporary jobs associated with the Project.Thus,while the Project would require energy and transportation fuels, the Project would achieve City objectives for the community that would not render the energy demand as wasteful,inefficient,or unnecessary consumption of energy resources.Energy impacts would be less than significant. Geology and Soils: The Project Site is located in the seismically active Southern California region and could be subject to moderate to strong ground shaking in the event of an earthquake on one of the many active Southern California faults. However, no currently known active surface faults traverse the Project Site and the Site is not located within a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.The nearest active fault, the Newport-Inglewood Fault, is an active right-lateral fault system consisting of a series of fault segments located mostly parallel to the coastline;refer to Figure 4.5-2,Local Fault Locations,of the City's General Plan EIR(Atkins,2017).The Project proposes no new permanent development;instead,the Project consists of temporary event structures,all of which would be removed following the end of the Project.There would be no potential for mechanical construction, grading, or trenching activities that would discover liquefaction zones,encounter expansive soils,or create the potential for erosion to occur. The Project Site is located in a relatively flat and highly urbanized area of the City with no impacts related to landslides. According to Figure 4.5-3,Seismic Hazard Zones,the Project Site is located within an area of low liquefaction potential and is not located within an earthquake induced landslide zone(Atkins,2017).Groundwater would not be extracted as part of the Project.No oil wells are located within the Project Site.According to Figure Symphony of the Flowers Project 16 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 501 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.5-5, Areas Prone to Subsidence, of the City's General Plan EIR, portions of the Project Site and areas adjacent to the Site are located within an area prone to minimal subsidence (Atkins, 2017). The Project proposes temporary restrooms and does not propose the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems.Overall,a less-than-significant impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Project does not include new permanent development. Instead, the Project consists of temporary event structures, such as lighting and sound equipment and bleachers. The temporary event structures would require the use of small hand-held power tools (some of which may be battery or electric powered)and two telehandler lifts and would require temporary power demand. The Project would generate temporary greenhouse gas(GHG)emissions from the installation of the lighting and sound features,bleachers,and other support features.However,since the Project would not include any mechanical construction excavation, grading, or trenching activities and would not remove or trim any existing vegetation or disturb existing trees or habitat,heavy-duty construction equipment would not be used. Minor emissions would occur from workers commuting to the Project Site using automobiles and light-duty pick-up trucks. Operation of the Project would generate minor amounts of GHG emissions from stationary sources.The Project lighting and sound features would be electric,but no fossil fuel combustion equipment would be used.The Show would include the use of amplified speakers and pathway lighting.However,energy demand and associated GHG emissions would be periodic and only required for the portion of the evening in which the Show would occur.The Project would require temporary energy for general lighting,which would be used for security and wayfinding and turned off each night at the close of each Show night. Operation of the Project may result in an increase in vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled as a result of the proposed Shows compared to the prior and existing conditions.Up to approximately 300 trips per day are anticipated from primarily passenger vehicles.Occasional supply trucks would visit the Project Site to deliver day-to-day goods such as concessions; however, only a few supply truck trips would be required on a daily or weekly basis.Vehicle trips would generate mobile source GHG emissions.However, emissions would be minimal given the low number of daily vehicle trips. The Project would use highly energy-efficient devices such as LEDs.The Project would also be planned in such a manner to promote alternative transportation uses such as public transportation. The Project objectives include continuing to provide a family-oriented safe,fun, and entertaining experience; continuing to provide a gathering place where locals and visitors can come together to enjoy flowers,and music; and continuing to provide temporary jobs associated with the Project. Thus, while the Project would generate GHG emissions from energy and transportation fuels, the Project would achieve City objectives for the community that would not result in GHG emissions that would have a significant impact on the environment nor conflict with plans,policies,or regulations for reducing GHG emissions. GHG emission impacts would be less than significant. Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Hazardous materials during the Project would be limited to use of small quantities of common commercial cleaning products that would be used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use, storage, and disposal of such products. Republic Services would provide cardboard general waste and recycling bins with lids to be located at the Project Site including the reserved parking lot areas and would place dumpster bins in accordance with expected attendance. Dedicated food waste bins would be placed near the concessions. The Project Applicant would be responsible to replace all full trash can liners throughout the venue and to place the trash from the bins into Symphony of the Flowers Project 17 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FM EIR December2024 502 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts the dumpsters to then be removed by Republic Services following the conclusion of the Show each evening. The Project Site is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.According to the City's General Plan EIR(Atkins,2017), the Project Site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport.According to the Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map,the Project Site is not located in a wildfire area (CAL FIRE, 2022). As such, there is no potential of wildland fires. Overall, a less-than-significant impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Hydrology and Water Quality: There would be no potential for mechanical construction, grading, or trenching activities and,thus,does not need to comply with the water quality requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)or a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP).Trash receptacles and dumpsters would be located throughout the Project Site and are currently located within public areas of the Central Park East. The Project Applicant would coordinate refuse needs with the City's waste management provider,Republic Services.The Project would not use groundwater supplies and is not located within a groundwater recharge area. The Project Site would temporarily increase impervious surfaces with the installation of the 8' wide pathways, composed of removable interlocking tiles which are,deposited above ground over geotextile. Once the pathways are installed, the walkways have an approximate width of 8' across. However, these pathways are located within the existing flat grass area, therefore, won't substantially alter the existing drainage pattern and won't result in erosion or siltation.Further,where paved areas exist(e.g.,parking lots and trails) within the Project Site, there is no potential of erosion or siltation and adequate storm,drain systems currently exist. The Project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.According to Figure 4.8-2,Designated Floodplains within Planning, of the City's General Plan EIR,the Project Site is not located within a floodzone(Atkins,2017). The Project Site is not located within a tsunami zone.The temporary event structures of the Project would be required to be designed and located to not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Overall, a less-than- significant impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Land Use and Planning: The Project is located within the Central Park East, a publicly accessible area and would continue to encourage pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular access to the Park. The Project Site would not be accessible to the public for park use''during the Show, including Show set up and Show breakdown; however, the Show is temporary, and the Project Site would return to pre-project conditions with full public accessibility at the conclusion of the Project. Further, the Project would not physically divide an established community. According to the City's General Plan Land Use Plan, the Project Site is located within the OS-P Open Space-Park land use designation.The Park designation provides for public parks and recreational facilities and supporting ancillary uses (i.e.,maintenance equipment storage).According to the City's Zoning Map, the Project Site is located within the OS-PR Open Space-Parks and Recreation Subdistrict. This district provides areas for public or private use and areas for preservation and enhancement. The Project is consistent with the OS-P Open Space-Park land use designation and the OS-PR Open Space-Parks and Recreation Subdistrict zoning designation. The Project does not include any developments or permanent structures or inconsistent land uses. The Project does not involve changes in the existing land use for the Symphony of the Flowers Project 18 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 503 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Project Site or the surrounding area.As such,the Project would be consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Map.As such,no impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Mineral Resources: The Project proposes no new permanent development; instead,the Project consists of temporary event structures, all of which would be removed following the end of the Project.According to Figure ERC-5, Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ), of the City's General Plan, the Project Site is located within a mineral land classification MRZ-2, which identifies that adequate information is available to indicate significant construction aggregate deposits are present.Any potential mineral resources would not be impacted by the Project since only temporary event structures would be erected and removed following the end of the Project.The luminous flowers would be manually planted into the ground a few inches below- grade. There would not be excavation to depths that would impact mineral resources.No onsite oil drilling or oil extraction occurs within the Project Site or within the nearby vicinity.As such,the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state.Further,the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. As such,no impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Population and Housing: The Project proposes no new residential uses or permanent businesses and does not include the extension of roads or infrastructure. The Project consists of temporary event structures, all of which would be removed following the end of the Project.The Project is intended to accommodate existing residents and visitors to the area and would not induce substantial unplanned growth. The Project does not propose the removal of any existing structures or housing and therefore would not displace people or housing.As such,no impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Public Services: In addition to existing fire protection and police protection provided by the HBPD and HBFD, the Project Applicant would also provide private security The private security company would coordinate crowd control, internal and overnight security, venue safety, and emergency evacuation in coordination with the HBPD. Within the Project's boundary, a site evacuation plan has been developed compliant with the City's Municipal Code fire and safety requirements. Although the Project would be enclosed by temporary security fencing, evacuation routes and exits would be maintained at multiple openings which align with existing pedestrian trails. Designated gathering points outside of the Project's immediate boundary would be maintained for evacuees and emergency personnel during emergencies. Since the Symphony of Flowers is temporary and served by existing public emergency response personnel as well as private security provided by the Project Applicant,the Project would not interfere with the City's regular public safety patrol operations and emergency response times. The Project would not increase population,and therefore,would have no impact to schools,parks,and other public facilities.A less-than- significant impact would occur,and no further analysis of this issue is required. Recreation: The Project would increase activity and users within a portion of Central Park East during off peak hours. The Project Site would not be accessible to the public for park use for the six-month duration of the Show, including Show set up(one month before the Show) and Show breakdown(one month after the Show); however, the Show is temporary, and the Project Site would return to pre-project conditions with full public accessibility at the conclusion of the Project. Further, since this activity would happen during off peak hours in the evenings,this activity would not impact most Central Park users who visit the Park during the day for various purposes, including, but not necessarily limited to, walking, running, and Symphony of the Flowers Project 19 ESA/D202300048 Addendum FMEIR December2024 504 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts birding. The Project Site would be cleaned after each public-use evening and would also be entirely restored following the end of the Project to pre-project conditions. As such, the Project would not result in a substantial or accelerated physical deterioration of the Park. Further,the recreational activities associated with the Project are temporary and would not require the construction or expansion of permanent recreational facilities that would have an adverse physical effect on the environment.As such,a less-than- significant impact would occur, and no further analysis is required. Tribal Cultural Resources: The Project proposes no new permanent development;instead,the Project consists of temporary event structures, all of which would be removed following the end of the Project. In addition,the erection of the temporary event structures would be at or near-grade on the grass. The luminous flowers would be manually planted into the ground a few inches in depth.There would not be mechanical construction excavation,grading,or trenching activities associated with the Project. Further, the Project is an addendum to the Certified 1999 FMEIR. Since the NOP for Certified 1999 FMEIR was filed before Assembly 52(AB 52)came into effect on July 1,2015,the current Project does not need to comply with AB 52. As such, a less-than-significant impact would occur, and no further analysis is required. Utilities and Service Systems: The Project would use existing connections and facilities for water, wastewater,stormwater,electrical,natural gas,and telecommunications.For the proposed water basin and fountain,the Project Applicant would bring in water to fill the basin.The estimated power consumption for the Project is 700-800 kilowatt-hour (kwh) per day. Portable restrooms and ADA bathrooms would be provided.Each of the single portable restrooms would sit in a containment tray on top of plywood(or other suitable flooring) and would not be within 50 feet of an existing storm drain. Wastewater generated from the Project is hauled off by the Project Applicant's vendors (i.e., portable bathrooms). Republic Services would provide cardboard general waste and recycling bins with lids to be located at the Project Site including the reserved parking lot areas and would place dumpster bins in accordance with expected attendance.Dedicated food waste bins would be placed near the concessions.The Project Applicant would be responsible to replace all full trash can liners throughout the venue and to place the trash from the bins into the dumpsters to then be removed by Republic Services following the conclusion of the Show each evening. The Project would comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Wildfire: The Project Site is not located in a very high fire hazard severity zone or designated as a State Responsibility Area nor is the Project Site near a State Responsibility Area(CAL FIRE, 2020). As such, no impact would occur in this regard. CEQA Topics Evaluated in Detail This Addendum focuses on the implementation of the Symphony of Flowers Project that would affect the following impact areas: aesthetics, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials (emergency evacuation),noise,and transportation.These issue areas are evaluated in greater detail due to the potential effects resulting from implementation of the Symphony of the Flowers. Symphony of the Flowers Project 20 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December 2024 505 • Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Aesthetics Would the Project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. Scenic vistas consist of expansive, panoramic views of important, unique, or highly valued visual features that are seen from public viewing areas. This definition combines visual quality with information about view exposure to describe the level of interest or concern that viewers may have for the quality of a particular view or visual setting. A scenic vista can be impacted in two ways: a development project can have visual impacts by either directly diminishing the scenic quality of the vista or by blocking the view corridors or"vista" of the scenic resource. Important factors in determining whether a proposed project would block scenic vistas include the project's proposed height, mass, and location relative to surrounding land uses and travel corridors.Scenic vistas within the City include views of the Pacific Ocean and associated beaches and the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve(BCER),which covers approximately 1,400 acres of wetland marshes containing wildlife(Atkins,2017). The Symphony of the Flowers proposes no new permanent development; instead, the Project consists of temporary event structures and features such as bleachers, a box-office, concessions, show controls, restrooms, pathways, lighting and sound equipment, luminous flowers, and a water fountain/basin, all of which would be removed following the end of the Project. The Pacific Ocean and BCER are located approximately 2.5 miles south and southwest of the Project Site. As such, the Project would not block views.Therefore,no impact would occur. b) Substantially damage scenic resources,including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. Scenic resources are natural or manmade features that are visually pleasing and contribute to the definition of a community or a region. Scenic resources can include such features as trees and landscaping,rock outcroppings and historic buildings.The most prominent scenic resources within the City are the Pacific Ocean and associated beaches.There are no state-designated scenic highways located within the City.However,Pacific Coast Highway is eligible for designation as a state scenic highway by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Further, Pacific Coast Highway is considered a major urban scenic corridor(Atkins,2017). Specifically, the Project is located within the northeastern portion of Central Park East. The Project Site primarily consists of a grass surface,trees,and paved pathways.As such,the Project Site is not visible from an eligible state scenic highway, Pacific Coast Highway, the Pacific Ocean, or associated beaches. The Project Site does not contain any rock outcroppings or historical buildings. The Symphony of the Flowers proposes no new permanent development;instead,the Project consists of temporary event structures,all of which would be removed following the end of the Project. The Project would not include any mechanical construction excavation,grading,or trenching activities.Further,the Project would not remove or trim any existing vegetation or disturb existing trees.Therefore,views of Pacific Coast Highway,the Pacific Ocean, or associated beaches would not be substantially altered by the Project.As such,no impact would occur. Symphony of the Flowers Project 21 ESA/0202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 506 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings?(Public views are those that are experiences from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? No Impact.The Symphony of the Flowers is located in an urbanized area and proposes no new permanent development; instead, the Project consists of temporary event structures, all of which would be removed following the end of the Project.Therefore,the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site and immediate vicinity exhibits considerable ambient nighttime illumination levels due to the densely developed nature of the surrounding areas including residential uses,commercial uses,industrial uses,park lighting,parking lot lighting, security lighting,and incidental landscape lighting. Automobile headlights, streetlights, and stoplights along the adjacent roadways contribute to the overall ambient lighting levels as well.Additionally,the Central Park East itself contains lighting throughout (e.g., pathway lighting along walkways, lighting associated with existing buildings and parking lots). The Symphony of Flowers proposes no new permanent development;,instead, the Project consists of temporary event structures, all of which would be removed following the end of the Show. The Project would use the existing lighting at Central Park East but would provide additional lighting throughout the Project Site comprised of artificial flowers which would be illuminated using LED lights within the internal structures,pathway lighting,lights to be projected onto the water fountain with a projection screen,lighting associated with the bleachers for seating, lighting for the concession stand and VIP terrace gathering area, and overnight security lighting.All Project lighting,other than the water fountain lighting,would be angled away from sensitive receptors.The water fountain lighting would project upward but would not create light or glare beyond the boundary of the Park. The Show is planned to operate during evening hours (i.e.,total darkness is required) from dusk to 11:00 P.M. during seasons of peak demand with up to 4 shows per evening. During times of lower demand,the Show is planned to operate from dusk to 9:00 P.M. or 10:00 P.M. with 2 to 3 shows per day. The Project would typically occur from Thursday through Sunday with up to 20 days of operation per month based on ticket sales for approximately 6 months.As a result,the Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare,which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area. Biological Resources Methodology for Biological Resources Evaluation Biological conditions were evaluated by reviewing applicable regulations, policies, and standards; reviewing biological literature and querying available databases pertinent to the Project area and vicinity including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's(CDFW)California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) (CDFW 2024a), CDFW's California Sensitive Natural Communities List (CDFW 2024b), California Native Plant Society's(CNPS)Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California Symphony of the Flowers Project 22 ESA/D202300048 Addendum FMEIR December2024 507 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts (CNPS 2024),Natural Resource Conservation Service's(NRCS)Web Soil Survey(NRCS 2023),U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Critical Habitat Portal (USFWS 2024a), USFWS's Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) (USFWS 2024b), and USFWS's National Wetland Inventory (NWI) (USFWS 2024b);and conducting a reconnaissance-level biological survey of the Project area. The reconnaissance-level biological resources survey was conducted by ESA biologists Amanda French and Florence Chan on October 25, 2024, within the 49.45-acre Biological Study Area (BSA), which includes the approximately 6.29-acre Project area and a 500-foot buffer area surrounding the Project area. The survey was performed by walking meandering transects throughout the BSA to document existing site conditions and assess the potential for sensitive and/or regulated biological resources, including special- status plant and wildlife species, sensitive plant communities, aquatic resources, and habitat for nesting birds. The following biological resource analysis relies on one mitigation measure from the Certified 1999 FMEIR to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level, with clarifying, implementation language to address the specific components of the Symphony of Flowers project: Measure Biological Resources 1 for Threshold (a) — Directed surveys for least Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher will be conducted prior to commencing any construction activities near disturbed riparian habitats.If the presence of either species is confirmed,construction and design plans will be modified to avoid impacts to these species. In addition,there are several project features,as described in the Project Description,that would ensure that potential impacts to biological resources would remain less than significant.These are identified as"Project Features" in this analysis to clearly articulate what elements of the Project Description(related to project installation and/or operation)would ensure that impacts would remain less than significant. As described in the Project Description, this analysis assumes that no grading activities would occur and no habitat would be removed. a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact with Existing Mitigation Incorporated.The Project is located within the northeastern portion of Central Park East, adjacent to public facilities and residential uses. The BSA contains 11 natural communities and land cover types that were identified during the reconnaissance survey, including arroyo willow thicket, cattail marsh, Fremont cottonwood woodland, Goodding's willow-red willow riparian woodland, duckweed bloom, eucalyptus grove, Himalayan blackberry patch, ornamental, open water, developed, and disturbed.All natural communities and land cover types identified within the BSA are shown in Figure 7,Natural Communities and Land Cover Types. Symphony of the Flowers Project 23 ESA/D202300048 Addendum FMEIR December2024 508 Nimrod Or " ° -� C3 Project Site Duckweed Bloom Ornamental . - � Survey Area (500R) Eucalyptus Grove <all other values> _ � Vegetation Community Fremont EPSG2230_Date20240826 if " - o Arroyo Willow 111111 Cottonwood RGB a �$ k Woodland �- r : ti -- Thicket Himalayan Red: Band_1 Cattail Marsh Blackberry Patch Green: Band_2-- IIIII Developed Open Water - Blue: Band_3 all Disturbed t .,*_.__..,:: , a s iS U u U 0 Vt 4 a Belva4D i 2 4 2 e: m cp s� ,� - L s o ._._. V. • O .° , � w - Ni, - pry�, � may,- � ^f� �. 'd� '�' _ SOURCE:Esri,2023;ESA,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 7 Vegetation Communities r ESA _. i 509 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Special-Status Plants A review of the CNDDB (CDFW 2024a)and the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants(CNPS 2024) revealed that many special-status plant species have been recorded within the Seal Beach and Newport Beach U.S. Geological Survey(USGS)7.5-minute quadrangles and six surrounding quadrangles (i.e.,Anaheim,Laguna Beach,Long Beach,Los Alamitos,Orange,and Tustin).Three special-status plant species have at least a low potential to occur within the BSA: southern tarplant(Centromadia parryi ssp. australis), Coulter's goldfields (Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri), and Sanford's arrowhead (Sagittaria sanfordii). Although moderately suitable habitat conditions are present within the riparian habitats (i.e., arroyo willow thickets, Fremont cottonwood woodland, and Goodding's willow — red willow riparian woodland)located in the northern,western,and southern portions of the BSA,there is no suitable riparian habitat within the Project area to support these special-status species; therefore, these species are not expected to be present within the Project area. Thus, no impacts to special-status plants are expected as a result of the Project,and no mitigation measures would be required. Special-Status Wildlife A review of CNDDB (CDFW 2024a)revealed that 65 special-status wildlife species have been recorded within the Seal Beach and Newport Beach USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles and six surrounding quadrangles. Of those 65 special-status wildlife species, a total of 46 species do not have the potential to occur due to the lack of suitable habitat and are therefore omitted from further discussion in this report. A total of 14 of those 65 special-status wildlife species have a low potential to occur within the BSA due to limited and/or marginal suitable habitat and lack of connectivity to other natural areas due to surrounding development, including southwestern pond turtle (Actinemys pallida), Crotch's bumble bee (Bombus crotchii), American bumble bee (Bombus pensylvanicus), western snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus nivosus),white-tailed kite(Elanus leucurus),southwestern willow flycatcher(Empidonax traillii extimus), western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus), western yellow bat(Lasiurus xanthinus), silver-haired bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans), wandering skipper (Panoquina errans), Belding's savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), light-footed Ridgway's rail (Rallus obsoletus levipes), and California least tern (Sternula antillarum browni). Special-status wildlife species determined to have a low potential to occur in the BSA are not further evaluated in this Section. Based on the presence of suitable riparian habitat within the BSA (arroyo willow thickets, Fremont cottonwood woodland,and Goodding's willow—red willow riparian woodland),there is moderate potential for three special-status wildlife species to forage and/or breed within the BSA: tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor),yellow-breasted chat(Icteria virens),and least Bell's vireo(Vireo bellii pusillus).There is a high potential for two special-status species to occur within the Project area and BSA, including monarch- California overwintering population(Danaus plexippus plexippus pop. 1) and yellow warbler (Setophaga petechia). Riparian habitats provide suitable nesting habitat for these four avian species and eucalyptus groves provide suitable roosting habitat for monarchs. Specifically, suitable nesting habitat for least Bell's vireo is present within the arroyo willow thickets located outside of the Project Site but within the BSA,approximately 100 feet southwest of the Project Site. The nearest known CNDDB occurrence is located approximately 4.3 miles southeast of the BSA within Fairview Park in Costa Mesa (CDFW 2024a). The citizen science platform, iNaturalist, mapped an Symphony of the Flowers Project 25 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 510 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts occurrence of least Bell's vireo from 2024 along the Santa Ana River within Huntington Beach approximately 3.6 miles southeast of the BSA (iNaturalist 2024). The citizen science platform, eBird, mapped occurrences of least Bell's vireo within the BSA (eBird 2024). eBird identifies multiple occurrences of least Bell's vireo in June and July 2015 and one to two records of least Bell's vireo in August 2017,March and April 2023,and September 2024.Due to the frequency of birding records for other species within Central Park East,the absence of least Bell's vireo occurrences during peak spring breeding season (e.g.,April and May)seems to suggest that least Bell's vireo may have stopped over within the BSA in the past,but did not breed. For tricolored blackbird, yellow warbler, and yellow-breasted chat, in addition to suitable habitat being present within the arroyo willow thickets, suitable nesting habitat is present within all riparian habitats, including cattail marsh, Goodding's willow-red willow riparian woodland, and ornamental vegetation within the wetlands. Eucalyptus groves present throughout the BSA provide suitable roosting habitat for overwintering monarch populations. In addition to two CNDDB occurrences from 2022 being present within the BSA,Xerces Society designates the eucalyptus groves within the eastern and southern portions of the BSA as western monarch overwintering sites (Xerces Society 2024). The eastern eucalyptus grove is located along the eastern edge of the Project area and the southern eucalyptus grove is located along the southwestern corner of the Project area. Monarch butterflies generally arrive at overwintering sites along the Pacific coast beginning in September and the first half of October(Pelton et al.2016). Stable monarch butterfly aggregations persist through January into February(Pelton et al. 2016). The surviving monarchs breed at the overwintering site before dispersing in February and March(Pelton et al. 2016). Light Many wildlife species have evolved physiological and behavioral responses to light cues from day-night cycles,moon phases,and seasonal light levels.The intensity,duration,spectral quality(distribution of light spectrum colors emitted by light source), and periodicity of light exposure affects the biochemistry, physiology, and behavior of organisms(Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 2009).Processes, such as movement patterns, breeding behavior, feeding, growth, and many more, can be affected by light for birds, mammals, and other wildlife species (de Molenaar et al. 2006). Therefore, it is suggested that increased ambient lighting, including artificial lighting, may interfere with these natural processes ultimately impacting wildlife populations (Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 2009). It was found that habitat availability and quality was negatively affected by increased artificial lighting as it caused birds to avoid the well-lit areas(de Molenaar et al.2006). A recent study published in Nature showed that response to excess light varies by species and habitat type (open habitats like wetlands, fields, and farms versus closed habitats like forests) (Senzaki et al. 2020). Birds are highly sensitive to day length as a signal for when to begin breeding.The study showed that birds nesting in brighter, open habitats laid eggs about a month earlier than those in darker areas. Surprisingly, species adapted to low-light conditions saw improved nest success when exposed to more light, possibly due to better food hunting. However, the impact of light varied between species—while some benefited, others,like western bluebirds,experienced reduced nesting success. A study by the University of Cincinnati revealed that artificial light can interfere with monarch butterflies' ability to navigate during migration(Parlin et al.2022).Monarchs typically use natural light cues, such as the position of the sun and the Earth's magnetic field,to orient themselves. However, exposure to bright, Symphony of the Flowers Project 26 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 511 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts artificial lighting disrupts their internal compass,causing confusion and potentially leading them off course. For examples, when monarchs are exposed to nighttime light pollution, such as a streetlamp above their roost in a tree, it can cause a shift in their internal clock,making their body perceive the time as earlier or later than it actually is.This disrupts their sense of time. Areas surrounding the Project Site are highly developed and urbanized with commercial and residential development, all of which contribute to increased nighttime illuminance. Additionally, the Central Park East itself contains lighting throughout (e.g., pathway lighting along walkways, lighting associated with existing buildings and parking lots). Although special-status wildlife species occurring within the BSA would be habituated to the existing park lighting and surrounding urbanized areas, if installation of the Project's lighting results in substantially greater increased nighttime illuminance,these species,and others using the BSA, could potentially be subject to altered physiological processes, decreased habitat availability,and increased predation. For the Project, the Show's artificial flowers would be illuminated using LED lights within the internal structures of the flowers,which would emit very limited amount of light from each flower structure and are not expected to increase existing illuminance within the Project Site.In addition to the lighting of artificial flowers,additional lighting would include pathway lighting, lights to be projected onto the water fountain with a projection screen,lighting associated with the bleachers for seating,lighting for the concession stand and VIP terrace gathering area, and overnight security lighting. Although it is understood that increased ambient lighting can affect wildlife behavior, no quantitative increase in illuminance above ambient light is agreed upon as a threshold for significant impacts to wildlife. However, due to the limited low-level lighting that would be added from the Show,it is not expected that increased lighting levels resulting from the Project would result in significant impacts on the species inhabiting the Park including moderate and high potential to occur species like least Bell's vireo, monarch,tricolored blackbird,yellow warbler, and yellow-breasted chat. As discussed in the Project Description, the following Project Feature Biological Resources-1 would result in a less-than-significant impact to least Bell's vireo, monarch, tricolored blackbird,yellow warbler,and yellow-breasted chat: Project Feature Biological Resources-1: Lighting would be angled away from sensitive habitat areas, including riparian habitats (i.e., arroyo willow thickets, cattail marsh, Goodding's willow-red willow riparian woodland, and ornamental vegetation within the wetlands) potentially used by special-status riparian bird species(least Bell's vireo,tricolored blackbird,yellow-breasted chat,and yellow warbler)for nesting,and eucalyptus grove potentially used by overwintering monarch butterflies for roosting. Therefore,the Project is not expected to substantially increase the amount of light exposure to special-status wildlife in the Park and impacts to special-status wildlife species from Project lighting is less than significant. Sound Noise from human activities affects bird behavior and population dynamics.Research has shown that noise disturbance can reduce pairing success (Habib et al. 2007), lead to smaller clutch sizes (Halfwerk et al. 2011), and lower population density (Reijnen and Foppen 1994). It can also interfere with bird communication by masking or distorting male songs(Habib et al.2007),alter habitat selection,and trigger stress responses that harm bird fitness (Kleist et al. 2018). However, responses to noise are specific to Symphony of the Flowers Project 27 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December 2024 512 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts individual species due to varying physiology, so it is difficult to determine exact responses of specific species unless previous studies were conducted on them. Some studies have even found no significant impact of noise disturbance on birds.For instance,Lackey et al. (2011) reported no connection between construction activities and territory placement, density, or reproductive success in golden-cheeked warblers (Dendrioca chrysoparia). Another study found that forest-nesting birds experienced reduced clutch sizes,higher clutch failure rates, and lower nest success in noisy areas compared to quieter ones(Senzaki et al.2020);however,in contrast,birds in open habitats,like wetlands and fields,were unaffected(Senzaki et al.2020).The negative effects of noise on forest birds may be due to their lower-pitched songs, which are more easily disrupted by low-frequency human noise, delaying nesting(Senzaki et al.2020). A 1991 study by the San Diego Association of Governments estimated that noise levels exceeding 60 dBA Leq in least Bell's vireo habitats could mask the bird's song,reducing its reproductive success and ability to defend its territory during the breeding season (mid-March to mid-September). That same year, the USFWS recommended keeping noise levels below 60 dBA to protect the coastal California gnatcatcher and other bird species.Thus, 60 dBA Leq is used as the threshold for assessing noise impacts on avian specie s resulting from the Project. As discussed in the Project Description, the following Project Feature Biological Resources-2 would result in a less-than-significant impact to least Bell's vireo,monarch,tricolored blackbird,yellow warbler, and yellow-breasted chat resulting from noise: Project Feature Biological Resources-2: Speakers installed would be directed away from sensitive receptors,including the riparian habitat and eucalyptus groves. Although the Project would occur at night when avian species are less likely to call or sing and move around,due to the potential for noise disturbance to least Bell's vireo,,indirect impacts due to noise would be potentially significant. Thus, Measure Biological Resources-1 in Certified 1999 FMEIR, which requires directed surveys for least Bell's vireo and appropriate avoidance if the species is found, would reduce potential impacts from noise to less than significant with mitigation incorporated (Sapphos Environmental 1999). To satisfy the requirement for directed surveys and address modifications to construction and design plans to avoid impacts to these species,the following detailed measure is proposed to implement the Certified 1999 FMEIR Measure Biological Resources-1 for this Project: Implementing Measure for Biological Resources-1 : Directed surveys for the federally and state- endangered least Bell's vireo will be conducted using similar methodology guidelines set forth in the 2001 USFWS Least Bell's Vireo Survey Guidelines (USFWS 2001). A total of 10 survey rounds should be conducted within suitable habitat beginning in mid-March between dawn and 11:00 a.m. within all potentially suitable habitat within the BSA. If least Bell's vireo is observed within 500 feet of the Project Site,the Project shall maintain noise levels at or below 60 dBA Leq or existing pre-Project baseline noise levels,whichever is greater,as measured at the edge of the identified least Bell's vireo territory. If necessary, a qualified biologist may also recommend implementation of noise reduction measures, including installing noise barriers along the perimeter of the Project Site, which can also serve as visual barriers; a no activity buffer around the least Bell's vireo Symphony of the Flowers Project 28 ESA/0202300046 Addendum FMEIR December 2024 513 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts territory up to 500-feet; biological monitoring(e.g., weekly or more frequently as needed); and/or advise that the Project be modified or temporarily shut down if needed to avoid disturbance to least Bell's vireo until either the territory has been deemed inactive or the Project is complete. Although the Project would occur at night when avian species are less likely to call or sing and move around,due to the potential for noise disturbance to tricolored blackbird,yellow-breasted chat,and yellow warbler, indirect impacts due to noise would be potentially significant. Therefore, the following Project Feature will result in a less-than-significant impact to these species resulting from noise Project Feature Biological Resources-3: A qualified biologist will conduct nesting bird surveys within seven days prior to the start of the avian nesting season(generally defined as January 15 through September 15).If an active nest is found,the nest should be avoided,and a suitable buffer zone delineated in the field where no impacts would occur until the chicks have fledged the nest or the nest has failed as determined by a qualified biologist. Avoidance buffers are generally 300 feet for non-listed passerines and 500 feet for listed avian species and raptors; however, avoidance buffers may be reduced for non-listed species at the discretion of the biologist, depending on the location of the nest and species tolerance to human presence and Project-related noises and vibrations. If necessary, the qualified biologist may also recommend implementation of noise reduction measures,visual and/or acoustic barriers or other protective measures, and/or advise that the Project be modified or temporarily shut down if needed to avoid disturbance to nesting birds until nesting is complete.If active nests are found,weekly monitoring will occur,or other frequency determined appropriate by the qualified biologist until either the nest has been deemed inactive or the Project is complete. A study on monarch butterfly larvae exposed to simulated highway noise found that short-term exposure caused a significant increase in heart rate,indicating stress,but long-term exposure led to habituation,with no lasting heart rate elevation (Davis et al. 2018). According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, highway traffic noise levels typically range from 70 to 80 decibels (dB)when measured 50 feet from the highway(Corbisier 2003).If the Show is planned to occur after February 28th(of any year),outside of the peak overwintering season (October-February) for monarch butterflies, then no impact would occur to overwintering monarchs. If the Show begins prior to February 28th (of any year) within the peak overwintering season, then potentially significant impacts could occur to overwintering monarch due to increased noise exposure at night. As discussed in the Project Description, the following Project Feature will result in a less-than-significant impact to overwintering monarch: Project Feature Biological Resources-4: Pre-activity surveys for overwintering monarchs will be conducted prior to the start of the Show during overwintering season (October-February) within suitable eucalyptus grove habitat. If overwintering monarch is observed,the Project shall maintain noise levels at or below 60 dBA Leq or existing pre-Project baseline noise levels,whichever is greater,as measured at the edge of the identified overwintering monarch habitat. If necessary, a qualified biologist may also recommend implementation of noise reduction measures, including installing noise barriers along the perimeter of the Project Site, which can also serve as visual barriers; a no activity buffer around the overwintering monarch habitat; and/or advise that the Project be modified or temporarily shut down if needed to avoid disturbance to overwintering monarchs until the end of the overwintering season. Symphony of the Flowers Project 29 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 514 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? - No Impact.The BSA contains two sensitive communities:Fremont cottonwood woodland and Goodding's willow-red willow riparian woodland(CDFW 2023a).Fremont cottonwood woodland habitat is a sensitive natural community (CDFW California Code 61.130.06)that was observed throughout the BSA,including within the Project Site.Goodding's willow-red willow riparian woodland habitat is also a sensitive natural community (CDFW California Code 61.211.05) that is located within the central portion of the BSA. Equipment and facilities for the temporary setup of the Project would not remove or trim any vegetation or disturb these sensitive natural communities;therefore,no impacts would occur. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? No Impact. According to NWI (USFWS 2024), there are mapped freshwater ponds, freshwater forested/shrub wetlands, and freshwater emergent wetlands within the BSA which were observed during the reconnaissance survey.These aquatic resources support aquatic habitat that is regulated by the CDFW and Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB). However,no impacts would occur to the wetlands as a result of the Project. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact. Wildlife corridors are features that exist as topographical or structural pinch points that, among other purposes, are utilized by wildlife for travel between one geographical area to the next. While these resources may support limited biological function and are perhaps utilized strictly for travel purposes,for example,a dry culvert under a roadway or bridge;more often,they contain natural vegetation and habitats that support foraging,roosting,and breeding activities,as well. The Central Park East is a part of the larger Huntington Beach Central Park complex that was once connected to BCER. Today, the Central Park East and BCER are separated by two busy roadways, Goldenwest Street and Edwards Street,making it difficult for terrestrial wildlife to cross.Central Park East is also surrounded by residential, commercial, and industrial development to the immediate northwest, north, and east, which limits wildlife movement through the area. The Project is not anticipated to significantly restrict the limited movement of wildlife because the BSA would remain accessible to any wildlife movement during the installation of equipment and show operations. These Show operations are not anticipated to disrupt wildlife movement. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)is the domestic law that affirms,or implements,a commitment by the U.S.to four international conventions(with Canada,Mexico,Japan,and Russia)for the protection of a shared migratory bird resource.The MBTA makes it unlawful at any time,by any means,or in any manner to pursue,hunt,take,capture,or kill migratory birds.Under California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3513, and 3800, a project operator is not allowed to conduct activities that would result in the Symphony of the Flowers Project 30 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FM ER December2024 515 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts taking,possessing, or destroying of any birds of prey;the taking or possessing of any migratory nongame bird as designated in the MBTA;the taking,possessing,or needlessly destroying of the nest or eggs of any raptors or nongame birds protected by the MBTA; or the taking of any nongame bird. The Project includes Project Feature Biological Resources-4 in the Project Description and thus would comply with the MBTA and the California Fish and Game Code for the protection of avian nests and their young. Thus,potential impacts would be less than significant. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact.The City requires a permit for maintenance on trees located on any street,parkway,or public place(Chapter 13.50.Regulation of Trees).Since the Project does not plan to maintain or spray trees within the BSA,there will be no conflicts with tree preservation policies or tree ordinances. The Project will not remove or trim.any vegetation or disturb existing trees. Therefore, there would be no impacts to local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. As mentioned above under Issue A, the Central Park Final Master Plan EIR was prepared in 1999 as the environmental document supporting the Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Hunting Central Park(Master Plan).The purposes of the Master Plan are to plan for facilities and programs that will continue to provide diverse recreation opportunities for all citizens consistent with the goals of the 1996 City of Huntington Beach General Plan.The Master Plan involves planning to maintain existing facilities as well as improving 157.5 acres of park land. Project level elements of the Master Plan include construction of a sports field complex; park, tree, and landscape maintenance expansion area; outdoor music area, and consolidated camping area.Program level elements include low intensity recreation;middle area/urban forest trailhead; semi-active recreation; Sully Mille Lake group facility;and police/civilian gun range.The Project does not conflict with the Master Plan since it is temporary that will not impact the program and project level elements of the Master Plan. f) Conflict with provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The Project Site falls within the Orange County Transportation Authority M2 Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan(NCCP/HCP)(ICF 2016);however,the Project would not conflict with provisions of this adopted NCCP/HCP, or other approved local,regional, or state habitat conservation plan, as it is located outside of the plan area. Therefore, no impact would occur to provisions of an adopted HCP,NCCP,or other approved local,regional,or state habitat conservation plan. Hazards and Hazardous Materials (Emergency Evacuation) Would the Project: e) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan to Central Park East. Within the Symphony of the Flowers Project 31 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FM EIR December 2024 516 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Project's boundary, a site evacuation plan has been developed compliant with the City's Municipal Code fire and safety requirements. Although the Project would be enclosed by temporary fencing, evacuation routes and exits would be maintained at multiple openings which align with existing pedestrian trails. Designated gathering points outside of the Project's immediate boundary would be maintained for evacuees and emergency personnel during emergencies; refer to Figure 6, Site Evacuation Plan. A less-than- significant impact would occur. Noise Would the Project: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction Noise The Certified 1999 FMEIR contemplated the construction and operation of a Consolidated Camping Area in the general location of the proposed Symphony of the Flowers Project. As discussed, and evaluated in the Certified 1999 FMEIR, the Consolidated Camping Area was contemplated to include mobilization, grading and drainage, electrical, asphaltic concrete and concrete placement, minor structure assembly, a telephone line,security lighting,water facilities,a picnic/group meeting area,complete automatic irrigation system,site furniture,and installation of plant material.The Symphony of the Flowers Project proposes no new permanent development,unlike the development contemplated in the Certified 1999 FMEIR.Instead, the Project would consist of temporary event structures, all of which would be removed following the conclusion of the Show. The Project would generate noise related to the assembly and disassembly of temporary structures such as bleachers,perimeter fencing,and speaker installations within the walkways and by the bleachers,in addition to the installation of a water basin/fountain at the center of the Project.The Project would not require heavy-duty off-road construction equipment,such as dozers,excavators or pile drivers,and would not generate noise from such equipment.Noise associated with assembly and disassembly of temporary structures would be generally confined to the Project Site and would not conflict with the City's Noise Ordinance, Chapter 8.40 Noise Control, Section 8.40.090 Special Provisions, which exempts noise associated with construction between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M.Monday through Saturday, as long as construction noise does not exceed 80 dBA Leg at nearby sensitive receptors. Construction noise during these hours would not exceed the 80 dBA threshold as construction equipment used for Project- related above-ground structures would include pneumatic tools, pickup trucks, and forklifts which would have a maximum noise level of 85 dBA at 50 feet.At the nearest off-site sensitive receptor,approximately 900 feet to the north,noise levels would be below the 80 dBA threshold as the doubling of distance reduces noise levels by 6 dBA:Thus, even at 100 feet operation of these pieces of equipment would be below the 80 dBA threshold. Construction activities with the Project that occur outside of the hours set forth in Section 8.40.090 would be limited to programming activities,which is not expected to exceed 50 dBA Leg.As stated,previously at each doubling of distance from the source of the noise,noise levels would be reduced by 6 dBA.Therefore, nighttime activities associated with the Project would be barely perceptible to the interior environment of Symphony of the Flowers Protect 32 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December 2024 517 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts nearby sensitive receptors at 900 feet or greater from the Project site.In addition,nighttime activities would not result in an exceedance of the State of California's 45 dBA interior noise threshold for residential land uses because at 100 feet noise levels would already be reduced to 44 dBA Leq.Noise levels would be lower than this at the nearest sensitive receptor,which is located approximately 900 feet away from the Project. Noise levels would be further reduced in an interior environment as the exterior of a residential building with windows closed reduces exterior noise levels by approximately 25 dBA Leq.Thus,there would be no potential for mechanical construction excavation,grading,or trenching activities that could cause a substantial adverse change in ambient noise compared to the findings of the Certified 1999 FMEIR. Therefore, construction noise impacts from the proposed Symphony of the Flowers project would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts compared to the findings in the Certified 1999 FMEIR, and impacts would be less than significant. Stationary Noise The Symphony of the Flowers would result in the installation and operation of 76 speakers for the duration of the Project. While intermittent,the noise analysis assumes that all the speakers would be playing at the same time with 64 low-volume speakers located throughout the Project pathways and 12 speakers located on the west side of the proposed bleachers and oriented towards the bleachers.Noise from the operation of the speakers was evaluated using the SoundPLAN model, which calculates noise dispersion from the Project multiple speakers and generates noise contour lines at nearby sensitive receiver locations. Sensitive receiver • locations include biological resource areas within the Central Park East, residential uses to the west of the Project along the west side of Goldenwest Street, and residential uses to the north of the Project along the north side of Slater Avenue.The Huntington Beach Central Library is located to the south of the Project. As discussed in the Biological Resources section of this document,biological resource areas are located to the east and southwest of the Project Site. The nearest biological resource areas include suitable nesting habitat for least Bell's vireo present within the arroyo willow thickets located outside of the Project Site but within the BSA, approximately 100 feet southwest of the Project Site. In addition, the eucalyptus groves present throughout the BSA provide suitable roosting habitat for overwintering monarch populations.The eastern eucalyptus grove is located along the eastern edge of the Project area and the southern eucalyptus grove is located along the southwestern corner of the Project area. As shown in Figure 8, Symphony of Flowers Noise Model, noise levels at the biological resource areas near the Project Site would approach and potentially exceed 60 dBA Leq, As discussed in under Biological Resources, the Project would include several project features,as described in the Project Description,that would ensure that potential impacts to biological resources would remain less than significant. Noise levels at residential uses and the Huntington Beach Central Library would be lower than at the biological resource areas near the Project Site due to distance attenuation.The nearest residential uses are located approximately 900 feet to the north and to the west from the Project Site. The Huntington Beach Central Library is located approximately 1,500 feet to the south of the Project.As shown in Figure 8,noise levels at these off-site receptors would be less than 45 dBA Leq from Project operational noise.The ambient noise levels based on noise measurements conducted by ESA are shown in Figure 9, Ambient Noise Monitoring, and indicate that the Huntington Beach Central Library had noise levels which approached 54.1 dBA Leq at ST-4. The noise levels to the north had noise levels that approached 67.7 dBA Leq at LT-1. Symphony of the Flowers Project 33 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 518 .4. r fe x i• to _ •" " Y �, � Yn' {g��p 'A� 9rR 4 s r j' -; In dB(A)on,. , ,a 8 e ; 4 ' ,� a 3 " 4,„ ,, ',. *''' . . f i - , m+,4 ' 4 * '„, ,,,-< a r , �� .. f, 0,,,,,, lik, 80 - 85f f d` f t y, 1 it a4*-; � + ' a ,f .&''''''' '44 , '„, ' , ,,,,,,.,,,,,-1",4„,,, ,'7,,', ,ap4,0, .,..4 ..„....\,i ,t1, ,,,,--,..;..„.„.,*, f 50 55 `e r ` A . f 45 = 50 e lrh _ 1444as ® � - 40 45 4 s +. , 4. s 35 40 4 Legend cc 1),.,t "` u. ot. . a ♦ Receiver 4 Speakers N ,, e y ' s Bleachers t. Afi, to z � �$ '41 a a , Y 4r g t - ' :',1:4ty :, .. '3,,,,i,F; 4 t''7-2'.. 43' ' 3 I t ,, , LL 3 t. .- } ' , x-per .. f ' •,b`v' � - 1 4. Ll 15 t e�,t, ,a --- _ = v� r. ` k 'a �_s L �J :• < r 0 100 zoo 400 600 o O 1 ; ._. - feet a SOURCE:ESA,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony FigureFlowers 8 Noiseof Model r ESA `� 519 i Betty'Dr ,'r ,' �- -:A,--.: ., _ , r` Capstone Dr. ' 5r .i g ; " ,. ,, a A ..' 11. •• - Ai,azti,4.4f 25t,,, ,, , ,,,- , Ak N‘li it,•rit.' •. "‘„ ' . tr•*--t7„r71,77-',,,,,; • . - ,:a'itc'• • x...Vr4 �= r0 ° Ford Or " r11 u . • _�Ma,nhattancor '4,: 4oii,, & „" „ a , . 4, , s7obi Sla' 414e 71'"•d BA L°°ems `!' l"' .. �= q) - --. -» � - Stater Ave 3 <+� ,,,,,:,1; ,ea, R s ',1..1'g ,erect „,.... '" �`., -s ,� s g1 ,—_ , l .. 1 '• t - *, + i .�i '41 k: y t, t . t � .-it ,•A v1a.Angett .. .4* �. ,' . -�� 4,"I, s t� —) �� 4.7: •;;‘, t+-1 ...- ' - -E-4,..c)-A _-�9P- Oak-view vista�,detfrSot�r 1' � .'1 "� � ,„' a �^ - jr: r . 111 1 LT 2(>7�1.1 ,,„ - u. e all iiiltia Garona<or : t dBA Leq). '-': .Ai ..,..A... i ', i , , ',. 'i:O.,0.!.,,;,„:',40, ,,00f,,,,,,.. , „ w "7',:1:1."- ‘,..',1,.; .7....1,_4,'‘:7: '.,,,' '7. 7..rial oiri ` .,t,. ST-13 (66?-2 dBA Leq) , ; _ al * dBA Leq) 4 p �(54:0 dBA Lq) * �^ " 4 `: .. '".`r. Huntington Beach ; -titiq - . r"'°' '`. ' 41 .� „, The ambient noise measurements were conducted using r e ►` a`= ,. • i'lc the Larson-Davis Soundtrack LxT1 Precision Integrated '---,"` ,`'� A Sound Level Meter,which is a Type 1 standard instrument : t \• ' ` as defined in the American National Standard Institute S1.4. ,.. ' W s ' ` .• All instruments were calibrated and operated according to '•- '.` ,.-` 2 the applicable manufacturer specifications.The microphone - a " was placed at a height of 5 feet above the local grade at P "> . the following locations. _ , -; • = x • Short Term o Hunt#rtgten „r ' 4 , $ Cent d ' t.,,.a *Short Terms(ST)were conducted on November 13th .,1. ' "- '" 2024 between the hours of 3:00 p.m. and 4:30 p.m. A - 4 single 15-minute measurement was taken at each of the - 4' �, Short Term sites. ' ri. ��� psi 7,..' „#.. • ''''� • Long Term :: *Long Term (LT)were conducted continuously over a 4-day o soo £' period from November 13th 2024 to November 17th 2024. .., s 0 Project Site a SOURCE:Esn,2023;ESA,2024 Huntington Beach Symphony of Flowers Figure 9 Ambient Noise Monitoring r ESA .i 520 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Based on the existing ambient noise levels shown in Figure 9; the project operation at the off-site noise sensitive residences and library would not contribute to a clearly noticeable 5 dBA increase over existing ambient conditions. In addition, project operations would not exceed the City of Huntington Beach's allowed exterior noise limits for residences and libraries as set forth in Section 8.40.050 in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance.For single-family residences the max exterior noise level permitted by the City is 55 dBA Leq from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 50 dBA Leq from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. For libraries the City permits an exterior noise level of 60 dBA Leq during the library's hour of operations. Given that the noise levels from speaker operations would result in a maximum increase of approximately 43.9 dBA Leq at the off-site residences;project operations would not result in excessive noise beyond those set forth by the City of Huntington Beach. Impacts at residential and library uses would be less than significant. Mobile Noise As discussed,under Transportation,the Project may result in an increase in vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled as a result of the Project compared to the existing conditions along local roadways.According to the Transportation Assessment for the Project, it is estimated that up to 900 visitors would attend a Symphony of the Flowers,which would result in approximately 300 vehicle trips per Show.Conservatively assuming that all vehicle trips occur within the same hour,traffic noise levels from 300 vehicle trips would approach approximately 59 dBA Leq.Ambient noise measurements conducted by ESA showed levels along the project roadways approaching 67.7 dBA Leg and 71.1 dBA Leq as shown in Figure 9 by LT-1 and LT-2, respectively. The nearest area within the park which had a noise measurement taken to the east was at ST- 5 which had a noise level of 54.0 dBA Leg. However, it is important to note that ST-5 was approximately 800 feet away from Gothard Street and was in a relatively low pedestrian area.Therefore, ST-5 would not properly catch traffic noise levels from Gothard Street. It can be assumed that at Gothard Street the Leg would be similarto those at LT-1(67.7)and LT-2(71.1).Thus,when incorporating the hourly noise average from the increase in traffic from the Project to the lowest known roadway noise level at LT-1 which is 67.7 dBA Leg the total output would result in 68.2 dBA Leg.Therefore,noise from the Project would result in a less than 1 dBA increase as it would only increase the noise on the lowest known existing traffic noise level by 0.5 dBA. A 1 dBA increase is considered a hardly perceptible change to the human ear and is overall difficult to distinguish,therefore, impacts would be less than significant in regard to project related traffic. The Project would not result in a new or more severe impact than that analyzed in the EIR. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction Vibration The Project proposes no new permanent development unlike the Certified 1999 FMEIR;instead,the Project consists of temporary event structures, all of which would be removed following the conclusion of the Project. There would be no potential for mechanical construction excavation, grading, or trenching activities that could cause the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. Operational Vibration During the Show,the Project would have soft instrumental music consisting of no vocals that would play throughout the Project Site at over 76 speakers across the Project Site. Of the total speakers, 64 would be Symphony of the Flowers Project 36 ESA/0202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 521 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts placed across the walkable areas of the Project Site and would be played in a manner to not impede normal human speech.Therefore,most of the speakers would not cause excessive vibration beyond the immediate vicinity.However, 12 speakers which would be placed in front of the bleachers at ground level would be playing louder than normal human speech. As a result, vibrations from these speakers would be more perceptible than the 64 low-volume speakers located throughout the pathways of the Project Site. The 12 speakers oriented towards the proposed bleachers are approximately 925 feet away from the nearest residential use.Groundborne vibration rapidly attenuates from the source as the distance from the source is increased. Therefore,human annoyance would not be of concern from speaker operations at this distance. The nearest structure,which can be structurally damaged from intense vibration is approximately 400 feet to the north of the Project Site. At this distance heavy duty construction equipment would not result in structural damage due to vibration;therefore,commercial speaker operation for an event would most likely not occur either. Therefore, in regards to Certified 1999 FMEIR,the Project would not result in any new or more severe impacts than previously identified for vibration impacts in regards to human annoyance and structural damage from construction and operation.Therefore,impacts are less than significant. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact.The Project is located approximately 7.7 miles to the northwest of the nearest airport which is the John Wayne International Airport in the City of Santa Ana. Given that the Project is not located within two miles of an airport/airstrip and the distance to the nearest airport; the Project would not result in exposing people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels due to airport/airstrip operations.Therefore,no impact would occur in regards to excessive air-travel noise. Transportation Would the Project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit,roadway,bicycle and pedestrian facilities? No Impact.As the Project would operate entirely within the boundaries of the Central Park East and does not propose any permanent change to the existing transportation system,the Project would not conflict with the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. The Project, as a temporary event, is subject to the Special Events policies as described in the City's Municipal Code Section 13.54.Approval of the Project's operation would require full compliance with the requirements within the City's Specific Event Permit Application process.As such,no impact would occur. b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less Than Significant Impact. Section 15064.3 of the State CEQA Guidelines identifies the need for evaluating vehicle miles traveled (VMT) changes associated with either a land development project or a permanent change in transportation infrastructure.The State CEQA Guidelines do not identify whether and how VMT should be measures or evaluated for a temporary or seasonal event. Although temporary, the Symphony of the Flowers Project 37 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 522 Conclusions Regarding Addendum as an Appropriate Mechanism Project would result in an increase in visitors to Central Park East.The majority(approximately 70 percent) of visitors are expected to travel from within a 30-mile radius, while the remainder (approximately 30 percent) are likely to travel further. Visitors who travel by passenger car would be encouraged to carpool, while others who travel by transit or non-motorized modes would be supported by the existing circulation network.Based on the expected attendance and travel characteristics,VMT generated by the Project would be lower than periodic fluctuations in Citywide VMT for season and planned special events including travel as measured during the past Thanksgiving holiday, the Pacific Airshow, and the U.S. Open of Surfing. Further,the Project does not introduce any permanent changes to land use or transportation infrastructure. Under the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,subdivision(b),VMT assessments prioritize long-term impacts,whereas the Project is temporary and utilized existing infrastructure.Due to the temporary nature of the Project, support by existing infrastructure, and that the estimated VMT is fewer in comparison to fluctuations in daily VMT during other activities,the Project is considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT and is consistent with the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,subdivision(b).Please refer to Attachment B, Transportation Assessment. c) Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? No Impact. The Project would not result in any permanent changes to the transportation system and no structures or other features would block access or change geometric conditions.As such,no impact would occur. d) Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact.The State CEQA Guidelines do not provide a protocol or threshold of significance to evaluate evacuation conditions for a temporary gathering of people(only permanent land use change).As such, an evaluation of the Project's operation and evacuation plans was conducted to ensure consistency with applicable plans regarding emergencies.The Project would not result in modifications to existing access to Central Park East, and emergency access routes would be maintained through the existing network of roadways and internal pathways. The Project's operation would comply with fire and safety requirements as mandated by the City's Special Event Permit process. Additionally, the Project has coordinated with appropriate response agencies in preparation of a site evacuation plan which includes evacuation routes for visitors and gathering locations for visitors and emergency response personnel; refer to Figure 6, Site Evacuation Plan. These measures ensure the Project would not impede emergency response or evacuation plan.As such,no impact would occur. Conclusions Regarding Addendum as an Appropriate Mechanism As demonstrated by the discussion above,impacts associated with the Symphony of the Flowers would be similar to or less than the impacts addressed in the Certified 1999 FMEIR.No substantial changes would occur with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the Certified 1999 FMEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, no new information of substantial importance has become available relative to any of the environmental topic Symphony of the Flowers Project 38 ESA/0202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 523 List of Preparers categories that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts. In addition, the applicable mitigation measure included as part of the Certified 1999 FMEIR would continue to be implemented under the Project.Although the Symphony of the Flowers wasn't originally contemplated in the Certified 1999 FMEIR,none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163 requiring a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR would occur. Additionally, there are no known mitigation measures or Project alternatives that were previously considered infeasible but are now considered feasible that would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment identified in the Certified 1999 FMEIR. Therefore, implementation of the Symphony of the Flowers would not create any potential adverse impacts beyond those evaluated in the Certified 1999 FMEIR. As such, the preparation of an Addendum for the Project is appropriate and fully complies with the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15163,and 15164. List of Preparers Lead Agency Jennifer Villasenor,Community Development Director City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ESA Brian Allee,Project Manager Terri Avila,Project Director 420 Exchange, Suite 260 Irvine, CA 92602 Fehr and Peers Steve Brown, Senior Principal Baldwin Ngai,Senior Engineer/Planner 101 Pacifica, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92618 Symphony of the Flowers Project 39 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 524 References Cited References Cited Atkins, 2017. City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update,Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No.2015101032,Volume II—Final Program Environmental Impact Report,prepared August 2017,https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/files/users/planning/Volume-II-Draft-Environmental- Impact-Report.pdf CAL FIRE,2022.Fire Hazard Severity Zones, State Responsibility Area Comparison Application, November 21,2022,https://calfire- forestry.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=fd937aba2b044c3484a642ae03 c3567 7.Accessed November 2024. CAL FIRE,2020. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection,California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. [online]:https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.Accessed November 2024. California Native Plant Society.2024.Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. . https://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants.Accessed November 2024. CDFW(California Department of Fish and Wildlife),2024a. California Natural Diversity Data Base. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data#43018408-cnddbin-bios.Accessed November 2024. CDFW.2024b. Special Animals List.https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentlD=109406. Accessed November 2024. CDFW.2023.California Sensitive Natural Communities List. Sacramento, CA:CDFW,Natural Heritage Division.June 1,2023.https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentlD=153609&inline. Accessed October 15,2024. City of Huntington Beach,2016.Zoning Map,City of Huntington Beach, https://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/files/users/planning/zoning-map.pdf.Accessed November 2024. City of Huntington Beach General Plan,Adopted October 2017. https://cros3.revize.com/revize/huntingtonbeachca/Documents/Departments/Community%20Deve1 opment/Planning%20Zonning/General%20Plan/Generalplan/Tables_of Contentslists.pdf. Accessed November 2024. Corbisier C.2003 Living with noise.Public Roads,a journal of the US Dept of Transportation,Federal Highway Administration 67.https://www.fliwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/03ju1/6.cfm. Davis,A.,H. Schroeder,I.Yeager,J.Pearce.Effects of simulated highway noise on heart rates of larval monarch butterflies,Danaus plexippus: implications for roadside habitat suitability.Biology Letters.May 2018.Volume 14,Issue 5. de Molenaar,J. G.,M. E. Sanders,and D.A. Jonkers.2006.Road lighting and grassland birds:Local influence of road lighting on a black-tailed godwit population.Pages 114-136 in Rich,C.,and T. Longcore,editors.Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting.Covelo,CA:Island Press. DOC(California Department of Conservation),2022.California Department of Conservation,California Important Farmland Finder,https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/.Accessed November 2024. Symphony of the Flowers Project 40 ESA I D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 525 References Cited Habib,L.,E.M.Bayne, and S.Boutin.2007.Chronic industrial noise affects pairing success and age structure of ovenbirds Seiurus aurocapilla.Journal of Applied Ecology 44:176-184. Halfwerk, W.,L.J.M.Holleman,C.M.Lessells, and H. Slabbekoorn.2011.Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success.Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 210-219. ICF. 2016. Orange County Transportation Authority M2 Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan.Final.November. (ICF 00536.10.)San Diego, CA.Prepared for Orange County Transportation Authority,Orange,CA. Kleist,N.J.,R.P. Guralnick,A. Cruz,C.Lowry,and C.D.Francis. 2018. Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community.PNAS 115:E648-E657. Lackey,M.A.,Morrison,M.L.,Loman,Z.G.,Fisher,N.,Farrell, S.L.,Collier,B.A., and Wilkins,R.N. 2011.Effects of road construction noise on the endangered golden-cheeked warbler.Wildlife Society Bulletin 35:15-19. NRCS(Natural Resource Conservation Service).2024. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.Accessed November 2024. Parlin,A.F., S.M. Stratton,and P.A.Guerra.Oriented migratory flight at night: Consequences of nighttime light pollution for monarch butterflies.iScience 25(5). https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(22)00581-8. Pelton,E., S.Jepsen,C. Schultz,C.Fallon,and S.H.Black.2016. State of the Monarch Butterly Overwintering Site in California.The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation.Portland,OR. https://www.xerces.org/sites/default/files/2018-05/16-015_01_XercesSoc_State-of-Monarch- Overwintering-Sites-in-California web.pdf. Reijnen,R.,and R.Foppen. 1994.The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland.I. Evidence of reduced habitat quality for willow warblers(Phylloscopus trochilus)breeding close to a highway.Journal of Applied Ecology 31:85-94. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution.2009.Artificial Light in the Environment.Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/flle/2 28832/9780108508547.pdf.pdf. Sapphos Environmental. 1999.Draft Master Environmental Impact Report for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach,California. State Clearinghouse Number 97091007.Prepared for City of Huntington Beach on February 26, 1999. Senzaki,M.,J. R.Barber,J.N.Phillips,N.H. Carter,C.B. Cooper,M.A.Ditmer,K.M.Fristrup, C.J. W.McClure,D.J.Mennitt,L.P. Tyrrell,J.Vukomanovic,A.A.Wilson, and C.D.Francis.2020. Sensory pollutants alter bird phenology and fitness across a continent.Nature(2020): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2903-7. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS).2001.Least Bell's Vireo Survey Guidelines.January 19,2001. • Symphony of the Flowers Project 41 ESA/D202300046 Addendum FMEIR December2024 526 References Cited USFWS (U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service).2024a. Critical Habitat Portal. https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265 ad4fe09893cf75b8dbfb77.Accessed November 2024. USFWS(U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service).2024b.Information for Planning and Consultation(IPaC). https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/index.Accessed November 2024. USFWS(U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service).2024c.National Wetlands Inventory Mapping Database. Available at:https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/.Accessed November 2024. Xerces Society. 2024.Map of Overwintering Sites.https://westernmonarchcount.org/map-of- overwintering-sites/.Accessed November 2024. Symphony of the Flowers Project 42 ESA/D202300048 Addendum FMEIR December 2024 527 Appendix A Ambient Noise Measurement Data 528 529 Summary File Name on Meter LxT Data.038.s File Name on PC bsT 0007057-20241113145142-LxT_Data.038.ldbin Serial Number 0007057 Model SoundTrack LIP Flnnware Version 2.404 User Location Job Description Note Measurement Description Start 2024-11-13 1451:42 Stop 2024-11-17 14:13:48 Duration 95:22:06313 Run Time 95:22:06313 Pause 00:00:00.0 Pre-Calibration 2024-11-13 08:4354 Post-Calibration None Calibration Deviation - Overall Settings RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight A Weighting Detector Slow Preamplifier PRMLxT1 Microphone Correction Off Integration Method Exponential Overload 145.2 dB A C 2 Under Range Peak 101.2 98.2 103.2 dB Under Range Limit 38.3 38.0 45.1 dB Noise Floor 29.2 28.9 35.9 dB First Second Third Instrument Identification Results LASxq 67.7 dB LASE 123.1 dB EAS 224.628 mPa'h EASE 18.843 mPa'h EAS4O 94.215 mPa'h LApk Inoue 2024-11-13 15:5137 122.4 dB LOSrnax 2024-11-13 15:5137 108.9 dB LASmfr 2024-11-15 02.524O t3`;'. tia,a ;� - -'*,�` Y dB SEA 136.5 dB Exceedance Counts Duration UK>85.0 dB 88 321.0 s LAS>115.0 dB 0 0.0 s LApk>135.0 dB 0 0.0 s LApk>137.0 dB 0 0.0 s IApk>14O.0 dB 0 0.0 s LCsxq 73.5 dB LASsq 67.7 dB LCsxq-LAseq 5.8 dB LAinq 70.1 dB LAN 67.7 dB LAlaq-IAaq 2.4 dB ?.-' =. dB.=llmeStamP+ tl, . - t< ..dBi.=TimeStamp°:' ".': de• .:.Time Stamp :' Lae LSlmaoi 308.9 ,2024/13%33 15 51.37'-_ Lelmbl " .i .33.9 ..i 2024/11/35 2:52:40 • . .. 1pk(mca) .. ;;1224 2024/11/13.15:SL•37,i ,r.. - -- . Overload Count 0 Overload Duration 0.0 s Dose Settings Dose Name OSHA-1 OSHA-2 Exchange Rate 5 5 dB Threshold 90 80 dB Criterion Level 90 90 dB Criterion Duration 8 8 h Results Dose 0.80 1.72% ' Projected Dose 0.07 0.14% TWA(Projected) - 37.3 42.8 dB TWA(t) 55.2 60.7 dB Lep(t) 78.5 78.5 dB Ln Percentiles LAS 5.O0 72.6 dB LAS 10.00 70.7 dB 16S33.3O 64.6 dB LAS 5O.00 59.7 dB LAS 66.60 54.3 dB LAS 9O.O0 45.3 dB 530 ( QM?%t§ \\\\\ |\\\\ ug q ;;m \!\2\2 §&k J \ \\\\ ! ;; 444 Roo 2����4440 k§ §§�.. ! N;} — )\k §»» < 4g4 \ \\ \\\ ! 2 Al' § fet /\\\\ ,mess,e „;„;\ . ^`- - ° ®° ||§; ,��;&; 25■%q ;-|;; !; , - , � !,§g§! - , =;■angq- ■2°, ° 22:§@:»§ - • " @; §«n; §]■e® e,-,ii ! 11 _ A" , -,.g( l-fm; ! !) §}" } §§ q iA d22 § B 3 \\\\\\ |. •]` ! § kX o . |f % | .;se5 *| ;| c v9 ; ! | xt cog e § k I ! fI |T| / � l ,,!e■,■,-- J2;k 22m k |d § , / !! ! ! :_,I lE= » ■m!! A ) 22|k!::!! |,i22 1111111 Ili iiiIIIf ill \!§ ||!||§ §§kkk ii1114 113 21fba | {§ ggS 2 B% . , \\\ #\,'; »|2- "on || ! \/ \\\ I ,,, }\\\\§ ,;,= ,,,«, ; § m : - ®A- :;;; i\ |_,,, \ \\\\ §- {( j - z : : k iv E \kt§ aA\ li \t. 2 tSS \/\ a/§; - „#!! , ,,811%T_ ,l,.,, "'" "I !k!2`|k`§;| | ;;§§ §§� |���°° §;:§;� ■);;r �5 K-`�° ; ;;;;;; k|q� _ . ;«� ! MO" m !! ' ! ,nn | 1 4, , 444 § § § §!� \\\\\\ k \\ , || ! i | fl3JIti h || !I 0` | | III | ■ !� | O ! . !!I J . A. a ! |!!!i 1 ]Inli!|R. §i112 #!4!« sib ]||.1 ƒ||§1! A M R§ • E5EW, HMI IMF? i [lip"! ' N 111111E all [ i i iii $ I 1F} tsfl P Ill li 11 I a E GGG 8 9 E� sG 888GIgaa.G g; N, ilvz "UM" rx W iip; SCl.PWM 8 Ori,.�, C�C.5 0W H VNN oR ggg g IILI IniobbbG bu a n n a'Bga4- L b 6 i- n4..b4h obo oo. eienn Gm Sb�4 bb�►bL a laa i i G bbbaa m a m a a a . y a a a a a a 3 5 m m a C G G GGG p f a c bioe .SOWN d'K 000g`bi ME 83 M. &Eft" aaa aaa _e C s s aaa YIT t w • > / \/.__ \i\ \4/\}\ \i\\j \ ,,, . \/\\\\ -§;; |§ - 7 \ \\\\ £ \ \ \! ";;§ n §j\ "gigw |{\jm !\ ` \\\\\\ " ;; ," . } \`\ ! \\§]§ \\27] § § ` \_ |` —t\�,... _ \k \\ § "\ \ , !!f'4111% ; ,,,,,,}: . : \{ �..... K§§ |" | n ' §E!\ k;| | | §`2g7 F000 ;;;;;= ;) o §-.. ;;l; R§ )§§;; | !!!/5|! 'Anti| " - ;;4 |§;A )4 ]| ) MAP ' M44 |� §� \§ RR n \\\ \\ \\ \\\( •|| ' | # | `!| \ || !| I ;■■2■ || y | !| || ! ||i|||||| }�|I|i| || \ |||!|| i }!| ||k||■ \ #!�!! !$tk || \�k||| }|$ilk \||3|3| Noise Calculation Worksheets TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS TOOL r ESA Project Name: Symphony of Flowers 535 • Analysis Scenario:Operational Source of Traffic Volumes:Project Assumptions Distance from Peak Hour Segment Ground Roadway to Speed(mph) Peak Hour Volume Noise Level Noise Level Type dBA CNELReceiver(feet) Auto MT HT Auto MT HT (Leq(h)dBA) Trafc Trips/Event Goers Hard 30 30 30 25 300 0 0 58.8 59.1 Model Notes: The calculation Is based on the methodology described In FHWA Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual(1998). The peak hour noise level at 50 feet was validated with the results from FHWA Traffic Noise Model Version 2.5. Accuracy of the calculation is within a0.1 dB when comparing to TNM results. Noise propagation greater than 50 feet Is based on the following assumptions: For hard ground,the propagation rate is 3 dB per doubling the distance. For soft ground,the propagation rate is 4.5 dB per doubling the distance. Vehicles are assumed to be on a long straight roadway with cruise speed. Roadway grade Is less than 1.5%. CNEL levels were obtained based on Figure 2-19,on page 2-58 Caltran's TeNS 2013. • Symphony of the Flowers Project SoundPlAN outputs 01 Tralfic_Noise ESA 12/10/2024 536 AdeeroetV>:; ., Land Us* .m'.r.dq Rehrete*Ndlartmel+'.. .... 'chumps - Bird Habitat(south of Site) Blo Habitat 51.9 Bird Habitat(south of Site) Blo Habitat 53.0 Ice rinkwith loudspeaker music 75.0 SoundPlAN Library Bird Habitat(south of Site) Rio Habitat 55.1 Outdoor public address systems Bird Habitat(south of Site) Bio Habitat 57.2 (presentation and music) 100.0 WHO Bird Habitat(south of Site) Blo Habitat 60.1 Notes:World Health Organization recommends a Omit of 100 dB for outdoor concerts and festivals.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/atticiasWMC5187684/ Butterfly Habitat(east of Site) Blo Habitat 53.0 Butterfly Habitat(east of Site) Ble Habitat 55.2 Butterfly Habitat(east of Site) Rio Habitat 56.7 Butterfly Habitat(east otSite) Blo Habitat 58.4 Library Library 42.3 Residence(north of Site) Residential 42.8 Residence(north of Site) Residential 42.2 Residence(northeast)of Site) Residential 43.9 Notes: Receiver locations were placed at the edge of the relevant properties closest to the Project Site 537 Appendix B Transportation Assessment 539 F PEERS Transportation Fehr&Peers was retained to examine the proposed Symphony of Flowers project(Project)with respect to the transportation concerns associated with temporary events,including parking demand and intersection queuing at Project access points,and the potential environmental impacts defined in Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which identifies for specific questions: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance,or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,subdivision (b)—which relates to vehicle-miles-travelled? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design features(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Existing Transportation System Regional Travel Access to Huntington Beach Central Park(Park) is provided by Interstate 405 (San Diego Freeway), State Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway), and State Route 39(Beach Boulevard).The San Diego Freeway generally extends northwest to southeast,serving as a major freeway that connects Orange County and Los Angeles County.The Pacific Coast Highway is located approximately two miles south of the Park and provides regional access via Goldenwest Street. Beach Boulevard,a regional connector, is a six-lane roadway extending from Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Huntington Beach north to Whittier Boulevard in La Habra. Local Roadways • Goldenwest Street—A primary north-south arterial, ranging from five to six lanes. Between Slater Avenue and Ellis Avenue,it is classified as an augmented Primary with three lanes in each direction and a raised center median.The adopted speed limit is 50 mph,with daily traffic volumes around 27,000 vehicles adjacent to the Central Park. • Gothard Street—Bordering the park on the east,Gothard Street is a four-lane divided roadway. It has a speed limit of 40 mph and handles approximately 19,000 vehicles daily south of Talbert Avenue.Surrounding land uses include industrial and residential areas further from the park. 101 Pacifica I Suite 300 I Irvine, CA 92618 I (949)308-6300 I Fax(949)859-3209 www.fehrandpeers.com 540 November 2024 Page 2 of 18 • Slater Avenue—This east-west arterial north of Central Park stretches from the Bolsa Chica Wetlands east to Santa Ana. It is a four-lane divided road with a speed limit of 45 mph,carrying around 21,000 daily vehicles west of Golden West Street. • Talbert Avenue—Extending east from Huntington Central Park,this road becomes MacArthur Boulevard in Santa Ana.West of Gothard Street,Talbert Avenue is a two-lane undivided street,functioning as a parking lot connector.East of Gothard,it expands to four lanes with a 35-mph speed limit, handling 17,000 daily vehicles. • Ellis Avenue—South of the park, Ellis Avenue is a three-lane road west of Golden West Street(one lane westbound and two lanes eastbound),expanding to four lanes east of Goldenwest Street to Gothard Street.The speed limit is 45 mph,with a daily traffic count of 9,000 vehicles near Central Park. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Huntington Beach Central Park is surrounded by pedestrian facilities(Figure 1)that facilitate convenient access for visitors. • Along Goldenwest Street,sidewalks are present south of Slater Avenue and connect to the park's pedestrian trail network at multiple entry points. • Slater Avenue,situated to the north of the park,features sidewalks extending from Goldenwest Street to Gothard Street.Along the northern boundary of Central Park East, the sidewalk connects to the internal pedestrian trail of the Park, east of Duello Lane. • Gothard Street, located along the eastern boundary of Central Park East, has a sidewalk south of Slater Avenue and ends at the northeast parking lot of Central Park East. Sidewalk along the west side of Gothard Street continues south from the intersection of Gothard Street and Talbert Avenue to Ellis Ave. • Along Talbert Avenue,sidewalks connect to the Central Park East pedestrian trails and park facilities at its terminus near the east Central Park East parking lot entrance, creating an accessible route for pedestrians traveling to and from Gothard Street. In addition to pedestrian facilities,all roadway segments immediately adjacent to Central Park East provide Class II bicycle facilities. 541 3 a „74 �' ',d;.^y,� i. T f t i A 1/44 i [-xr 0«- -. ' "fir 'k ' ". ii 9' $� a qb" S 3 3:4 '4, a,. - 5 0- i,?(. (Now I R , • m ^. f v _ 4 i e :+ ;,fig a" 9. a' ;: ' ids .. 1. EXISTING SIDEWALK Figure 1 y PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PARK INTERNAL TRAIL SYSTEM Sidewalk and Pedestrian Trail Connections Not to Scale 542 November 2024 Page 4 of 18 Public transportation The Project area is served by several Orange County Transportation Authority(OCTA) operated bus routes,which facilitate travel near the park for attendees relying on public transit. Key bus routes serving Central Park East include the following, • Route 25 provides north-south connectivity between Fullerton and Huntington Beach, operating along Goldenwest Street adjacent to Central Park East.This route offers direct service to the park's vicinity. • Route 76 travels east-west between Huntington Beach and Irvine, offering connectivity to a variety of residential, commercial, and employment hubs.This route intersects with north-south transit corridors,facilitating connections for riders traveling from inland areas to the park,with stops near the park's eastern boundary. • Route 29 operates along Beach Boulevard, a regional connector providing service from La Habra to Huntington Beach.Although Beach Boulevard is located further east of the park, it intersects with local arterial roads such as Talbert Avenue, providing indirect connectivity to Central Park East. 543 elelle al 401 -11111 VIIIIPS Wier et ,), m U City n1 '"ram -�.. :".*`� =W Seal Beach 1. •m t We ST , Bofsa Ave 4. M y, r 66 .8 McFadden 65 _ aAve: �.,. on944, ,� ''bx Edingeri �<• .r.. s a® a a s `aAve r roe N \"+ 'r HunLrtgPon-, Sim � » m �A. ri r---` ��� '. harbour !�i E 2 +n s 70 Heilt ve ,N c o City of .` g :i m - Fountain Valley 21 �.� . Ave 6 me 2 ilk '` �'+�..�a'j""\� ewe MA me m Slater Ave. �` ,\' I '� I.� �. 'talb er,q�e I i- .Talbert Ave �S ',�� 7g • 9 a :II: C W Y s" Il m 5 1 Garfield Ave ;y — sa 1781, c,.5` �4- i I Yorktown Ave L'e a j1 '; "� _ ,JIII MN eg IS Be ki le 17 s MI ille lee, •.Illf Adams Ave x 0` /Indianapolis Ave LEGEND �' ' wI g " Wi Atlanta Ave Major City Streets ah�N104011 i l ---- City Limits hsy� f' Bus Route `�. I ihamtItonAve 0 .,a ,� a Route 1 �••Route 66 Oa �`"� �`.� Banning Ave ✓r.Route 2l •�+Route 70 `a�a .. `% rf • Route 25 Route 72 �a' C' Y Of Route 29 ■ +Route 76 . W t Costa Mesa ��Route 33 • +Route 178 `�5 '\, ••••••Route 35 ■ I Route 211 g+ a •... +Route 64 .. ..•Route 701 4 0( 0.5 w e� i I " MILES Data Booms.Data compiled by Stanbc Base Mac Source;Des of Huntegmn Beach{201c1 MEMININI Bus Route Map Figure CIRC-4 City of Huntington Beach General Plan City of Huntington Beach General Plan (Adopted October 2, 2017) 3-19 544 November 2024 Page 6 of 18 Project Summary The Project is a temporary event to be held at Huntington Beach Central Park East,offering an immersive evening experience featuring a water and light show, music, and art installations along pedestrian pathways as shown in the site plan (Figure 3).The event is designed to operate between dusk and approximately 11:00 PM during seasons of peak demand,with flexible scheduling to accommodate attendance,weather, and parking availability.The Project anticipates hosting up to four shows per evening,with an average attendance of 900 visitors per show and a maximum of 20 show nights per month over six months. Parking will be temporarily designated within the Central Park East lots,with accommodations for rideshare, public transit, bicycles, and pedestrian access. ess$ �.0 u o � K �s ; , f„scwuaraasca Figure 3 -Project Site Plan Project Operation The Project is planned to operate during evening hours from dusk to 11:00 PM during seasons of peak demand (up to 4 shows per day), and from dusk to 9:00 PM or 10:00 PM during times of lower demand (2 to 3 shows per day). Show schedules are adaptable based on anticipated attendance,weather conditions, and available parking. Programming will typically occur from Thursday through Sunday, up to 20 days of operation monthly based on ticket sales. Operation of 545 November 2024 Page 7 of 18 the Project will be contingent on favorable weather,as the viewing area of shows is exposed to elements, and shows will not take place during adverse conditions. Experience of each show includes a seated viewing of approximately 25-30 minutes in duration, followed by an optional self-guided walking tour through designated pathways,allowing visitors to engage with attractions and art installations within the Project site.Visitors are expected to arrive 15-30 minutes prior to showtime and depart within 15-60 minutes after the end of a show (depending on time spent walking through the attractions). During show days of the Project, portions of the existing parking lots within Central Park East will be temporarily designated for event parking to accommodate visitors arriving in private vehicles. To enhance accessibility and efficient circulation,the Project will also allocate specific areas for rideshare,facilitating the use of rideshare services as an alternative mode of transportation. Additionally,visitors will have the option to arrive via public transit,on foot,or by bicycle, supported by the park's existing pedestrian and cycling infrastructure,which connects to surrounding streets and the internal trail network. Project Attendance The Project is anticipated to attract an average of 900 visitors each show, roughly half of the maximum seating capacity.Although the travel behavior of visitors cannot be predicted precisely, the show promoters anticipate the majority(-70%)of visitors to originate from within a 30-mile radius,while some(-30%) are likely to originate from beyond the 30-mile radius.Given that the City of Huntington Beach frequently hosts a variety of special events and draws regional tourists, it is likely that some visitors may attend the Project as part of other activities in the city. In addition to visitors,approximately 50 employees would be present for each show day.Workers are expected between the hours of 7:00 am for show preparation and the conclusion of shows each day around midnight.The Project plans to hire employees locally who will travel only a short distance to and from the Project. Project Trip Generation Due to the unique nature of the Project,traditional trip generation data,such as those provided by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, is not relevant. In order to estimate the number of trips that would be generated by the Project, Fehr&Peers referenced data provided by the Project applicant related to the anticipated attendance.The Project expects approximately 900 visitors per show,who will travel to the Project site by a variety of modes including driving, rideshare, public transit,bicycling,and walking.Through managed parking and encouragement to carpool, the Project expects a maximum of 300 vehicle trips per show.This estimate does not account for further potential of reduced vehicle trips from transit and non-motorized travel. 546 November 2024 Page 8 of 18 Due to staggered showtimes and gradual arrival and departure,vehicle trips to and from the Project would be distributed across several hours. Based on these factors,a maximum of approximately 500 peak-hour trips (including overlapping of ingress and egress of visitors for different showtimes) is expected during the busiest periods. Project- Generated Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) This section addresses the VMT implications of the Project to support the second question in the CEQA Appendix G, which is summarized at the end of this study. Evaluation Criteria and Methodology Since July 1,2020, Level of Service (LOS),which is a measurement of the degree of congestion, is no longer allowable in determining a project's effects on transportation under CEQA,and, instead, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)was adopted as the appropriate metric to evaluate transportation impacts.The City of Huntington Beach follows the recommendations provided by the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in determining the significance of a project's potential impacts on a project-by-project basis using a VMT methodology. However,those guidelines are applicable only to long-term changes in land use or infrastructure. Neither CEQA Guidelines (Section 15064.3) nor OPR's recommendations' identify whether or how VMT should be quantified or evaluated for a seasonal or temporary event. In the absence of applicable guidance, we evaluated the Project's VMT compared to citywide conditions during other temporary events hosted by the City. The City of Huntington Beach is home to a wide variety of special events each year, regularly attracting visitors across the region.To understand historic travel during planned special events, we collected data in the form of anonymized-location-based data (from 3rd party sources)to calculate the change in daily total VMT within the City of Huntington Beach.This data is sourced from cell phones and GPS units on individual vehicles.All trips beginning or ending within the City Boundary2 were first identified for periods during historic special events of a considerable attendance,then the average trip length of such trips was identified. By multiplying the number of trips and the average trip length,the total Citywide Daily VMT is calculated. In 2022,travel data during the various activities were analyzed to provide baseline estimates of citywide daily VMT (Table 1). 1 OPR's Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, December 2018. 2 Including all internal trips,which begin and end within the City boundary. 547 November 2024 Page 9 of 18 Table 1 —Citywide Daily VMT (2022) Average Trip VMT/Day VMT/Day Condition Length (Miles) (Thousands) Relative to Baseline Mon-Thurs Non-Summer(Baseline) 6.75 j 8,065 100% Mon-Thurs in.Summer(no event) 7.58 7,995 -1% Friday in Summer(no event) 7.42 8,801 ; +9% Saturday in Summer(no event) 9.33 9,132 .ry ( +13% July 4th Weekend 8.40 7,906 -2% US Open of Surfing Weekend 91,3, 8,866 +10% International Surfing Association(ISA) 8.15 8,178 +1% Surfing and Para surfing Weekend Association.of Volleyball Professionals(AVP)a_ 8.05 9,324 +16% 1 Open Tournament Weekend Weekdays prior to Thanksgiving(Mon Wed) 7.20 9,739 +21% Thanksgiving Weekend 8.60 9,021 +12/ ° Pacific Airshow Weekend 9.15 9,815 +22% Source:Streetlight data for trips beginning and/or ending in Huntington Beach Note: 1.Summer data include an average of 2 consecutive weeks without special events in the month of July. Fluctuations in citywide daily VMT compared to non-summer weekdays range from a decrease of 2%to an increase of 22%. Project VMT can be estimated based on anticipated attendance(trips)and travel characteristics (trip distances). Each show is projected to draw approximately 900 visitors,with a maximum of 300 passenger vehicles expected per show.The Project proponents anticipate that 70%of visitors will originate from within a 30-mile radius,with an average of 15 miles per trip,while 30%will travel from beyond 30 miles,with an average trip length of up to 45 miles. Table 2 includes Project specific attributes to derive Project VMT.With a maximum of four shows per night,the Project would result in 28,800 VMT per show day. 548 November 2024 Page 10 of 18 Table 2 -Project VMT Project Specifics Quantity Unit Total Vehicles per Show ; 300 Cars %.of Visitors Within 30-Miles Radius 70% Average Trip Length j 15 Mile of Visitors Beyond 30 Mile Radius 30% % Average Trip Length 45 Mile Total VMT per Show ; 7,200 VMT'. Maximum Shows per Night 4 Shows Total VMT per Show Day 28,800 VMT VMT Findings Citywide VMT,with the addition of Project VMT,would be approximately 8,094,000(miles/day) during a non-summer weekday.This would be within the range of other events as described in Table 1 and would be less than that measured during past seasonal events,such as Thanksgiving holidays, Pacific Airshow,and the US Open of Surfing,which have caused temporary fluctuations in citywide daily VMT up to 9,815,000 (miles/day). Site Access and Parking Study Intersections While temporary,excessive congestion at intersections can pose operational hazards.To assess the effects of Project trips on the operation of nearby intersections, Fehr&Peers conducted a queuing assessment for all intersections and driveways providing access to the Central Park Library and Huntington Beach Sports Complex parking lot to evaluate their current operations. The list of study intersections are as follows, 1. Gothard Street&Talbert Avenue 2. Goldenwest Street&Talbert Avenue 3. Goldenwest Street&Driveway 1 (South of Talbert Avenue) 4. Goldenwest Street&Driveway 2(South of Driveway 1) Data Collection To assess the existing conditions at the study intersections,turning movement counts were conducted on Friday, November 8th, between 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM.This data collection timeframe aligns with the typical evening period of the Project,concurrently with a production presented at the 318-seat Library Theater between 8:00 PM and 9:30 PM and while all the facilities at the Sports Complex were reserved with the latest booking at 9:00 PM to 10:00 PM,which contributed to localized traffic activity. 549 November 2024 Page 11 of 18 As this data collection was conducted on a weekday,the observed traffic volumes likely reflect worst-case estimates of the typical evening period for the area.These conditions provide a robust baseline for analyzing the proposed event by capturing a realistic range of evening traffic activity in the study area,including periods of heightened use associated with existing programming. Table 3'describes the patterns of inbound and outbound trips over the 4-hour data collection period. Similar distribution patterns are assumed for trips to and from the Project. Table 3-Existing Trip Distribution Intersection No. Intersection Inbound Outbound 1 Gothard Street&Talbert Ave } 68.1% I 50.9% 2 Goldenwest street&Talbert Ave I 20;4% 315% °I 3 Goldenwest Street&Driveway 1 10.1% 14.2% 4 Goldenwest Street&Driveway 2 13%a 3 4% Intersection Queuing with the Project The intersection queuing assessment accounts for visitor arrival within a 30-minute window before each show,and gradual departure over a 60-minute time window, resulting in a maximum overlap of 500 vehicle trips within a peak period.As a worst-case analysis,we evaluated a condition with all arrival and departure trips(600) overlapping and occurring within the peak period of ingress and egress(Table 4).Trips to and from the Project were proportionally added to existing turning movements according to existing ingress and egress patterns of Central Park East. The queuing analysis finds that the Project's peak traffic conditions would not exceed the available storage lengths for any studied movements.At the intersection of Gothard Street& Talbert Avenue,the eastbound left-turn queue is projected to increase to 20 feet under the 95th percentile conditions with the Project,well within the available storage length of 80 feet.Similarly, the eastbound through queue at this intersection is anticipated to reach 55 feet,which does not conflict with through-lane capacities.At Goldenwest Street&Talbert Avenue,the southbound left-turn queue may extend to 20 feet, but this remains significantly below the 240-foot storage capacity.Overall, none of the analyzed movements show queuing impacts that exceed the designated storage lengths, ensuring the Project does not contribute to queuing spillbacks or operational inefficiencies during ingress or egress. 550 November 2024 Page 12 of 18 Table 4—Queuing at Intersections With Project Trips Existing 95th With Project 95th Storage Intersection Movement Percentile Queue Percentile Queue Length No. (ft)* (ft)* (ft) 1 Eastbound Left Turn(Egress) 20 20 80 ._. 1 Eastbound Through(Egress) 1 20 60 - 1 Eastbound Right Turn(Egress) 0 20 80 1 Westbound Through(Ingress) t 40 80 j i ! 1 Northbound Left Turn(Ingress) 20 20 125 1 Southbound•Right Turn(Ingress) 20 = =20 2 Eastbound Through/Right(Ingress) 20 20 100 2 Westbound Left Turn(Egress) _..._ i 20 ..w4., (, 20 g 60, 2 Westbound Through(Egress) 20 20 60 2 =Westbound Right Turn(Egress) ; 20 40 60 2 Northbound Right Turn(Ingress) 0 20 - ..,._.2 Southboun.w ._ ,....._ a �� 20� m „ d Left Turn(Ingress) 20240 3 Westbound Right Turn(Egress) - 20 100 3 Southbound Left Turn(Ingress); 20 185 4 Northbound Right Turn(Ingress) - 0 - �,..Westbound Right Turn(Egress) 20 100 *Values rounded up to the nearest 20 feet to represent a single passenger vehicle when 95th percentile queues are shorter then 20 feet • Parking To estimate the availability of parking for the Project,an inventory was conducted on Friday, November 8th, between 8:00 PM and 8:30 PM.Timing of the data collection was selected to coincide with the theater production at the Library Theater between 8:00 PM and 9:30 PM.The production, combined with evening reservations at the Sports.Complex,represented a period of heightened parking utilization during the evening period.The parking assessment found that 91 of 645 parking spaces adjacent to the Central Library were utilized, and of the 1,483 total parking spaces (combined with the Sports Complex),a total of 206,or roughly 14%,were occupied. Parking Demand Estimates Based on project show times,arrival and departure of visitors, and the number of workers present each day,Table 5 represents the anticipated parking demand of the Project over the course of a 551 November 2024 Page 13 of 18 typical evening,with a maximum demand of 429 spaces between shows.This demand would amount to approximately 30%of all designated parking spaces within the Central Park Library& Sports Complex parking lots. Table 5- Project Parking Demand Workers Visitor Total %of Total Parking Time of Day (30) (300) Parking Spaces 1st Show 2nd Show 3rd Show 4th Show Demand (1,483) 5 30 ;:i pm 30 50 180 I 12% "”_ 5:45 pm 30 � 100% 330 22% 6:00 pm�i. 430+ . ;100% I £ 330 22% 6:15 pm 30 100% 330 22% 6:30 pm 30 100% i 330 `s 22% 6:45 pm 30 100% 330 22% 7:00 pm. 30 i 66% ` 50% ` 378 25% 7:15 pm 30 33% 100% 429 29% 7:30 ipm; 30 0% 100% ? 330 22% .._ 7:45 pm 30 100% • 330 22% 8:00 pm 30 -100% 330 22%- 8:15 pm 30 i 100% 330 22% L 8:30 pm 30.{ 66% 50% 378 26% 8:45 pm 30 33% 100% 429 29% 9 00 pm 30 I i 0% 100% 330 22% 9:15 I pm 30 100% 330 22% 9 30= ,pm 30 100%° 3301 22% " 9:45 pm 30 100% 330 22% pm, 30 t ;.50% 378 26% 10:15 pm 30 33% 100% 429 29% • 10 30 1 pm 30 0% 100% 330 22°/a 10:45 pm 30 i 100% 330 22% 11 00 pm.1 30 i 100%, 330 22% • 11:15 pm 30 1 100% 330 22% 11:30 pm 30 66% 228 15% 552 November 2024 Page 14 of 18 11:45 pm 30 J 33% 129 I 9% 12:00 1 pm, 30 0% 9 30 s 2% Figure 6 provides a visualized representation of the Project's parking demand over a typical evening. Table 6- Project Parking Demand Visualized Project Parking Demand 1,400 1,200 1,000 m E 0 800 c Le 600 a. a 400 200 4:48 6:00 7:12 8:24 9:36 10:48 12:00 Time(pm) Considering the Project's projected demand and current parking usage,visitor parking will be adequately accommodated at the existing Central Park Library and Huntington Beach Sports Complex parking lots.These facilities are primarily used for daytime activities and can thus provide complementary parking for nighttime events. In instances where activities at the Sports Complex overlap,the Project's peak parking requirement of 429 spaces can still be met within the allocated parking spaces at the Central Park Library,thereby maintaining the availability of most spaces at the Sports Complex. Emergency Access Existing Emergency Access Infrastructure Central Park East is bordered by several arterial roadways,including Goldenwest Street, Gothard Street,Talbert Avenue, and Ellis Avenue,which collectively provide robust regional and local access to the Project site.These roadways,as noted in the City's General Plan Circulation Element, are key components of the City's transportation network to accommodate emergency response 553 November 2024 Page 15 of 18 vehicles.The park's internal circulation system, including multiple entry points and pathways, further enhances accessibility for emergency services. Project-Specific Emergency Access Measures During the Project's operations,emergency access will be maintained through designated ingress and egress points to ensure unobstructed movement of emergency vehicles.Temporary fencing installed around the Project site will include dedicated access points reserved for emergency use, which are aligned with the existing internal pathways within Central Park East.These pathways will remain accessible to accommodate emergency response vehicles. As prescribed by the specific events application process,approval of the Project would be contingent on compliance with "fire and safety requirements or standards of all of the ordinances of the City of Huntington Beach or the State of California applicable3,and the activity must not "interfere with or unreasonably obstruct the free flow of vehicular traffic or other means of travel on any public street,or with pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk".The Project's evacuation plan is provided as Figure 4. Consistency with Existing Plans The City of Huntington.Beach General Plan Circulation Element emphasizes the importance of maintaining roadway operations that support safe and efficient emergency access.The Project aligns with this objective by utilizing the existing roadway network,maintaining clear access routes, and avoiding any permanent modifications to the circulation system that could impede emergency response times. Furthermore,the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) identifies the need to ensure emergency access in areas prone to natural disasters,such as wildfires or flooding. The Project's operational hours,maintenance of clear travel paths,and weather-contingent programming reduce the likelihood of such risks impacting emergency access. • 3 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 13.54.140 554 • 1 2 3 a 7 1� 11 1' Skirl 1 1: 17 1: 1• a LEGEND , 41/4 rrwvtes • uaF.cr«n .1 . ri 1111531 wr�x,rcrowr "x' ,$i r�-rucr�•cu:s encEsa WI E ia` ' � k39Wi iffNb A§8t1 -� �y .a § �v� k tF i.Yk-N((itlt 1 Ff1tt �4 Y � F •. � . 4 � °d fl ,6 r spa t(s it�€eili r�Ha i1 ' 4. u —Xtw! ` r 7.,,,},�Z ,4 04"440,' d/-r ✓ " .dam. '' , 'Far'•.F Pt tE IFTg, 4 Y�• aN A • b,�i i'� - � �ii i'ii4!_iL�iYiik�iC�iFl♦il%'iI—il:l_ik!_ ( �ILLUMI DIRECTORS • /SUEE: UMr: (SITE SYMPHONY OF FLOWERS LAYOUT: SERIF: tI IAUE. 1 =25' FT(m) HUNTINGTON BEACH CA)2025 SITE EVACUATION PLAN E100 PRELIMINARY PAPER SIZE: CIVIC ADDRESS. SURVEY SOURCE: TYPE Of TERRAIN: CREATION GATE:Idd/mm/yyyyl 7i�ry�'1 ARCH FULL BLEED E(36'x48") -- 19/09/2024 PROJECT MANAGER. CONVERSION TABLE: ---- ALTITUDE: 'ZONING VERSION GATE:Idd/mm/yyyyl ��C U 1 C3rc� Foot-Meer=0.3048m(30.4BGn) 22/11/2024 Meter-Foot=32BU8399'(3'3-'�')(39%i vs-tjw. DRAFTER. COORDINATES. PERIMETER: VERSION: REVISION. Al FooP-Met.=0.092900304 MeteR 10.76391 V�1 r01 55 November 2024 Page 17 of 18 Impact Analysis Appendix G- Hazards& Hazardous Materials f) Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact.The Project would not result in alteration or obstruction of existing emergency access to Central Park East.Within the Project's boundary, a site evacuation plan has been developed compliant with City's Municipal Code fire and safety requirements.Although the Project would be enclosed by temporary fencing,evacuation routes and exits will be maintained at multiple openings which align with existing pedestrian trails. Designated gathering points outside of the Project's immediate boundary will be maintained for evacuees and emergency personnel during emergencies. Appendix G—Transportation Would the Project: a) Conflict with a program, plan,ordinance,or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? No Impact.As the Project would operate entirely within the boundaries of the Central Park and does not propose any permanent change to the existing transportation system,it would not conflict with the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan.The Project,as a temporary event, is subject to the Special Events policies as described in the City of Huntington beach Municipal Code section 13.54.Approval of the Project's operation would require full compliance with the requirements within the City's Specific Event Permit Application process and all relevant ordinances by extension. b) Would the Project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? No Impact. Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines identifies the need for evaluating VMT changes associated with either a land development project or a permanent change in transportation infrastructure.The Guidelines do not identify whether and how VMT should be measured or evaluated for a seasonal or temporary event. Although temporary,the Project would result in an increase in visitors to Central Park East.The majority(-70%) of visitors are expected to travel from within a 30-mile radius,while some(-30%) are likely to travel further.Visitors who travel by passenger car would be encouraged to carpool, while others who travel by transit or non-motorized modes would be supported by the existing circulation network. Based on expected attendance and travel characteristics,VMT generated by 556 November 2024 Page 18 of 18 the Project would be lower than periodic fluctuations in citywide VMT for seasonal and planned special events including travel as measured during past Thanksgiving holiday, Pacific Airshow, and the US Open of Surfing. Furthermore,the Project does not introduce any permanent changes to land use or transportation infrastructure. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,subdivision (b),VMT assessments prioritize long-term impacts,whereas this Project is temporary and utilizes existing infrastructure. Due to the Project's temporary nature,support by existing infrastructure, and that the estimated VMT is fewer in comparison to fluctuations in daily VMT during other activities,the Project should be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT and consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision (b). c) Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design features(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? No Impact.The Project would not result in any permanent changes to the transportation system and no structures or other features would block access or change geometric conditions. d) Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The CEQA Guidelines do not provide a protocol or threshold-of-significance to evaluate evacuation conditions for a temporary gathering of people(only permanent land use change).As such,an evaluation of the Project's operation and evacuation plans was conducted to ensure consistency with applicable plans regarding emergencies. The Project would not result in modifications to existing access to Central Park East,and emergency access routes will be maintained through the existing network of roadways and internal pathways.The Project's operation will comply with fire and safety requirements as mandated by the City's Special Event Permit process.Additionally,the Project has coordinated with appropriate response agencies in development of a site evacuation plan which includes evacuation routes for visitors and gathering locations for visitors and emergency response personnel.These measures ensure that the Project would not impede emergency response or evacuation plans. 557 „ ,,,,.......„,„ i'l\c TIN & 0Nii\ .. 4/ ..„. --___ _ __ S ym o n of • •. • _ pie I i • l- s------- 1:7 Flowers =-== _. _ • February 18, 2024 '4000.01110041 -..' - // )_/”.* ': '14%. ., c wee 7-44,---- --------7---- 4s, . •••• sock%•Ao$ 0 •,, • 17, 19P9i so C1° N/ TN C ./ Statement of I The City Council is asked to consider a License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC, for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers in a portion of Huntington Central Park East. I0ATNGT"IIO •.• � � A. .'0�`'I Contract and F Year 1 Years 2-3 Per Ticket Revenue $3 per ticket $5 per ticket Parking Revenue 60% City/40% Event Same as Year 1 City to provide parking attendant staffing Sponsorship Revenue 0% City to receive 20% Food and Beverage Revenue 0% City to receive 20% net profits Special Benefits City to receive revenue from 5 Same as Year 1 mutually agreeable days of off-peak (Monday—Thursday) performances. Event to ,/t\\NTING7 receive Food and Beverage 'A�� •,40RPORATf.o% All\ revenue during the 5 days to ,` •'•% help offset performance costs 11 c3 Restoration Fees Event to provide restoration Same as Year 1 o s;ram: Q 1, fee of $50,000 annually for ; •�•' Q=I C fa:: � turf and landscaping ......0UT1 � � Contract - Symphony Key Points for Symphony Obligations: • Shall operate between the City's Civil War reenactment and the City's American Revolutionary War reenactment. • Shall operate all sales of tickets, concessions, merchandise, and other products related to event operation • Shall operate all media and sponsorship events • Shall secure all required City and County permits, at their own cost and follow HBMC • Shall conduct routine maintenance and inspections as needed and make every attempt to keep noise level at a minimum during maintenance and inspections • Shall be responsible for all costs associated with materials necessary to make oii\ �NT1NGroy the event premise suitable for the event s�fir• ,N ° ••.,�F • Shall restore the event premises to its condition as existed before the event or h, U • �9=\� any event activities p • Shall be responsible for all costs and expenses to repair and/or replace any :9�''••.;FFB p p h p c 11°.1 equipment, facilities, or property damaged eoUNTy t; i, Contract - Symphony Key Points for Symphony Obligations Continued: • Shall secure an account, separately meter, and be responsible for the cost of all utilities and materials • Shall provide 1 ,000 event tickets directly to local, Huntington Beach based charities each year, and promote and host a special library event that will offer discounted ticket sales • Shall pay for the cost of any necessary environmental review as required by law and as required by the City for this event • Shall provide a complimentary sponsorship package for the city, which includes a prominent space for City usage from which the City may promote the City at the event, signage at locations throughout the event, placement of the City's logo on ,,' " all public event-related materials, and placement of City's logo and banner • ? .............`� o?� advertisements on all event websites ':;�_��` • Shall provide a complimentary hospitality package that includes 400 % V - com complimentary VIP hospitality passes for the eventperyear for use byCity's ���'::""'-"' - 1 1�� p Y p� Y Y employees and representatives ��F � ,.•...• \> CoUNTY Pii� • Shall work collaboratively with the City to determine a restoration plan Contract - City Key Points for City Obligations: • Shall conduct a lottery for non-profit fundraising opportunities at an upcoming City Council meeting • Shall allow access to the property 24 hours per day, with the last show ending by 10:30 pm, from Friday through Sunday, and access for troubleshooting and repair/maintenance of the show • Shall assist with event marketing, including Citywide banner/pennant program, social media, and press releases • Shall provide access to Central Library, Parks Tree Landscape, and Marion Lot parking lots for event activation �,ow NTINGr • Shall coordinate with Huntington Beach Sports Complex for collaborative use of `i 0.1.,;57,;77;..�� the parking lot for shows from Monday through Thursday PL :. ��U ''•;wz'�\ • tea 0 eGVNTY0 2�iil Financial The City will receive a one-time license fee of $15,000 and will receive a portion of event revenue from various fees, including tickets, food and beverage sales, and sponsorships. Additionally, the City will receive 60% of parking fees collected in the reserved parking areas, which will be used for capital improvement projects benefiting the Huntington Central Park and the Huntington Beach Central Library, including the restoration of the library fountains and park irrigation systems. The City is guaranteed a minimum annual revenue of $150,000. i � TIN ..... t, l/1 0N..Off( ..•\NtORPORAre°•.•. i i i %c9 %/fj••, FF ;, •••OQ , -c UNTY ;ii Environmental S An Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report (FMEIR) for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California (Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007) was prepared for the requested action. As demonstrated by the analysis in the Addendum, the Symphony of Flowers would not result in any new significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously identified significant impacts. Rather, all of the impacts associated with the Symphony of Flowers are within the envelope of impacts addressed in the Certified 1999 FMEIR and do not constitute new or substantially increased significant impacts. \ TIN' ••tT = I�I OUNT`I �P�i" Recommended A. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a License Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC, for the management and operation of Symphony of Flowers at Huntington Central Park East; and, B. Approve Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report (FMEIR) for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California - Symphony of Flowers Project (Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007) as adequate and complete in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements. T I NGT `` .......... 44 -57 Nik ��UNTY \i11 „../;-• . ,,... ../ Questions ? ..,_,..., , ..*1 '..°'Mit .*`:2-.'41 il 1-”. pi . , Ait _ 1 r 11 . . _ ‘,.., _, • 1 ..1 i ' - • , .\• '''''-,..c6.5=,„„.....•-•-'7%.,-;',. i ' .- — "•-",, -;',%...- -...-A•-- ' • "k - .-..,4.% .yke:"!- -- " ' ' \,-_•-=-7-•—.—ir: --Al ..6.T.--.- - -".. ". -'- ''''P-4 r .( 0' ',••-• •:II( ',"•••rt-_ ---:-•:--- ....-""---' ''''::;.=.f.,.. ,'I''' --.''''''' ...-i-7:,I ...7 ..?:,::''''.'"'. "•'--... ...c., , ,"... ''.'--: 1'1 '12: i t" ..-:-, ' -•: -:,::'. , -- • - ,'"'•-rc••es: 0 , „.......-r-_-_,I..---,_.- r.7.-:•=- - - --, -, = it .- .„4,iiizt\-,_.... . . - --•,;--- ,,...--e---- ,--,4.j.tP.'-4.2f-..... l 4 .-- . .•?...".r-, .2,111140..--...ri,,,,...0: ...4,. ,!.. „:+ '.,:r• • we . ' ,... ' -.r-c-% • -,. ,,..._, , • , -,,„ ;SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION From: jireed85 Meetin'g',Date: 2/18/2025 To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL,CM0 STAFF);suoolementalcommc)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Re:Please Stop This Light Show Agenda Item No,. 24 (25-017) Date: Thursday,February 13,2025 8:57:59 PM You don't often get em ail from:yreed85@protor nari corn Learn why this is frnportan I cannot believe this project is up for discussion again. You have single handedly gotten everyone in the city on the right and left to agree on one thing, and that is how terrible this event is. This is still a hard and fast, absolute N000000. We do not want it. If you want to look at models for events we can get behind to help with the budget- Look at things like the marathon that take no more than ONE DAY, bring in 20,000 people, fills the hotels and restaurants, and does not impact the residents of this city longer than a day, or ruin the environment long term. Same with the air show, brings in tons of people, but we only have to deal with it for a few days. Even the US Open for a just a couple weekends. Say no!!! JJ Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Saturday,December 14th, 2024 at 3:23 PM,jjreed85 <jjreed85@protonmail.com>wrote: Hello new council, I am asking you to please stop the discussion of this Symphony Of Lights event. It is just not right for us, especially at Central Park, and 8 months is way wayyyyyyyyyy too long. This is a huge commitment. It's not like a one weekend event we can just 'deal with'for a few days. You all ran on being anti high density... and while this may not be a permanent building, it feels a lot like increasing the population of our city for half of the year. Before you do anything, you need to give all of the Central Park neighbors a very clear and real description of this event and get their input before moving forward with anything official. And you need to be very very very clear on how this can impact their lives for 8 months per year, for 3 years (and you should give them the worst case scenarios). And I even mean neighborhoods within the traffic patterns as well, not just the direct surrounding neighborhoods. Everyone from the park out to the freeways or main traffic streets where attendees would be coming from. This should be a formal letter(or rather several attempts) sent to every single one of those residents. You should also find a way to inform people who frequent the park about this, so they can also voice their opinion. Not everyone watches the council agendas or is on Facebook forums. They won't know until it is too late and their lives become miserable for half of the year. HB does not need to house every event on this planet. We did not choose to live in this city (or stay, for those of us born here) so that it could become a massive tourist area. Most of us chose to live in the quiet small beach town HB once was, only a couple decades ago. We deal with it all in spite of what recent councils and chambers have turned us in to. It's really starting to feel like tourists have become far more important than those of us who live here all year. We don't want to be a 'destination community' as you call it. Here are just some of the problems with this event(or rather what feels like a permanent installation): • It is obviously way too long of a time frame. This event should take over no longer than 2 months (including setup and tear down) and that is even pushing it. This private company does not own our park or any other place in HB. I do not care if it is a 'small percentage' and an 'under utilized' section of the park, no company has the right to take it over for a nearly permanent period. They are going to 'own' this section of our park for nearly 70% of the time for 3 years?? That is ridiculous. • The obvious environmental problems. There is no doubt this will impact the environment. Sure you can replace grass damage, but how are you going to get the animals to come back to an area that is taken over for 8 straight months? Once they try coming back a handful of times only to see the same problem with their home, they will never try again. It will likely take many years for the true impact to be fixed (if ever). Don't we have a Bald Eagle that frequents Central Park, and other rare birds? You can't just consider the foliage and animals on the ground. • Traffic Impact. Again, there is no way that a potential 4000 people per night are not going to create a traffic increase. Every street that would lead to the park would be impacted. We already have a traffic problem, let alone bringing in all of these people who are unfamiliar with the area and cause accidents. It took me 10 minutes the other day to just get from Homegoods to Gothard, on Edinger the other day!!! Do you realize how ridiculous that is? Let's assume everyone travels as a party of 4, that's a potential 1000 extra cars per show day going to the same place on top of all other traffic (and depending on time of year, potentially on top of other events or holiday traffic). • Neighborhoods Impacted. Like I mentioned above, this project should not move forward at all without first talking to the surrounding neighbors. I have known people who lived in the Adams and Fairview neighborhood and were tortured by OC Fair goers. And that is not even a close walk to the fairgrounds. People will do anything not to pay the parking fee. While you may make these 'permit only' sections for the duration (also an additional step for the residents), that will not stop people from trying to park there and still creating a traffic impact both within the neighborhood and the main roadway outside of that neighborhood entrance. • Guests Do Not Respect The City. Guests from outside the city do not care or have any respect for our city's property or residents. They will not care where the designated event location is of the park, they will go, and walk, anywhere they feel like. The will not drive safely within our city limits, especially if they are late to the show, or trying to find parking outside of the lot. They will park in neighborhoods and not care where they park, how loud they are in front of people's houses, or where they leave trash. I could MAYBE see this being at some place like Goldenwest College in the parking lot or one of their back fields. Somewhere closer to the freeway, but still, you need to consider all of those neighborhoods of people. And the even bigger impact of the already congested Bella Terra area thanks to the stupid apartments that should never have been built. But it is still too long even then, and will not negate all of the issues above. If any discussion about this continues, it should be for a small scale, much shorter duration, trial version, and in a better location with less impact. There are so many more problems with this event than just the above. But the bottom line is that we as citizens put up with city events for a week or two here and there, but that's it. Even the US Open, which takes about 6 weeks physically, only really brings traffic in for a week (maybe even just the weekends). You are essentially trying to move an additional city of people in and out of our community for half of the year. Just totally, and absolutely, no. Please stop this craziness. JJ Sent with Proton Mail secure email. From: MJ Adams To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFFS Cc: suoplementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Fwd:Light Show Central Park Date: Thursday,February 13,2025 9:00:32 PM 5om people who received this message don't often get�maii from manejadams618@gmaifcorrr I earn whythis is irnpbrtant Still oppose to this light show at Central Park Begin forwarded message: From: MJ Adams <mariejadams618@gmail.com> Subject: Light Show Central Park Date: December 16, 2024 at 10:21:52 PM PST To: City.Council@surfcity-hb.org Cc: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org I am against the proposed Light Show in Central Park for the following reasons: 1.People attending the show increasing the level of noise for the residential areas surrounding the park. 2.Traffic congestion on all of our streets leading into the park entrances.This should be right next to a freeway. 3.Parking—there is not enough parking in the area if you are estimating 4000 people each night.How will locals use the Sports Center,library,senior center,and keep residential streets clear from these outside visitors.People will try to park in neighborhoods. 4.This will destroy the park and drive away animals and other species permanently. 5.Length of the show—eight months just isn't a possibility for the above reasons and many more not listed. We should not have any event that is longer than a month. I understand the concept to generate income for the city,but this is just too much for the citizens of this area.We do not want,nor can we handle an additional 4,000 people per night. We voted for you to fight against increasing the density of this city,not so you could increase it significantly for 6 months every year. Thank you for your consideration. From: Gary Tarkington To: citv.counci!Calsurfcity-hb.com Subject The"light Show"! Date: Thursday,February 13,2025 7:22:00 AM Importance: High NO light shows at our sanctuary, otherwise known as Central Park.The damage to the irrigation system, the disturbance to all of the wildlife, and the negative impact on the residents who live nearby is overwhelmingly more important than money. We don't want to ruin our beautiful park, and that it would!! Ann Tarkington Huntington Beach From: Janet Bead To: suoolementalcomm(aa surfcity-hb.orq Subject Fake flower field Date: Friday,February 14,2025 8:00:35 AM [You don't often get email from janetbeandesigns@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at hops://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] I am writing to ask that you oppose the very destructive plan of the Light Show in the Central Park. This plan is so very short sighted in the money is says it will bring in,opposed to the destruction of a very large section of the Central Park. It will not only kill turf,plants and trees,but it will kill or drive away all the wildlife. This will take years and a ton of money to restore. The 50k a year they are offering to restore is a drop in the bucket of what the actual restoration would cost. It was stated to me by the only one council member that bothered to respond,that they are looking at this because of how the prior city council kicked the can down the road,yet they are also kicking the can down the road. They can claim victory in balancing the budget in one year while kicking the can down the road for a future city council to figure out how to pay for the restoration. 400 VIP tickets to the city....what a crock. This is such a bad idea coming from those who campaigned on preserving our open spaces. We elected you based on your promises,this is not sticking to your promise and is a cheap money grab while destroying the beautiful open spaces. Vote NO! Janet Bean Sent from my iPad From: Charlotte McClanahan To: suoolementalcomm()surfcity-hb.orq Subject Light Show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 8:25:22 AM ,, 7;7 777 7-77-7 6,4 7.777 You don t ofterbOternait frorr"csrncdar a ran@tioud con Learn why tits rrnportan While I'm in favor or researching all areas of additional revenue for the city, I am totally opposed to light show being held in Central Park. I don't think believe the money realized by the city could be enough to justify the costs to repair the damage that will be done to the park, to say nothing of the long term damage to the animal life that makes the park its home. Please reject the light show at the park,Find a more appropriate location. Thank you for your consideration, Charlotte McClanahan 9221 Sherry Circle HB, 92646 Mr. Amory Hanson 8102 Ellis Avenue Apartment 121 Huntington Beach CA 92646 February 18, 2025 The Mayor Of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 My Dear Mister Mayor, I would like to express my support for Item XXIV. Sincerely Yours, Mr.Amory Hanson CC:The Honorable Casey McKeon CC:The Honorable Donald C.Kennedy CC:The Honorable Anthony Strickland CC: The Honorable E.M.Twining CC: The Honorable Grace Vandermark CC:The Honorable Chad Williams From: Chuck Burns To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.orq Subject Central Park Light Show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 11:23:09 AM Yqu don't often get email from clad2st@gmail corn 4 Parn wh}�thr`s�rs rm ortan I support this proposal to utilize the park to generate revenue for the city. A reply will be appreciated. Thank you Chuck Burns Huntington Beach CA From: Tracy 1 tall To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.org;suoolementalcommAsurfatvhb.orq Subject Fw:NO on the Central Park light show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 12:10:08 PM Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS Begin forwarded message: On Friday,February 14,2025, 8:32 AM,Tracy Luth<p.luth@verizon.net>wrote: I am writing again to express my disagreement with your plans to put a light show and fences in Central Park. You have been informed several times that putting up fences and shutting off the water for essentially 3 years will damage and kill most of the trees, flowers and shrubs in the area. Volunteers along with city employees (I assume)have spent ten years restoring this area. So much for"we will protect our parks" on your campaign signs. There are plenty of beach and commercial parking lots that a light show can be set up on. Again, such a disappointing city council....elections will come around again and I for one will remember . Tracy Luth Sent from the all new AOT,app for iOS From: Johanna To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF);suoolementalcomm ddsurfcity-hb.orq Subject Re:No On 8 Months Of A Light Show Takeover Date: Friday,February 14,2025 12:19:15 PM ,, You don t often get email frorr hb1Osyoyo@yahoo tom t earn whyy this is important Still 100%a complete NO. Everyone I know hates this event proposal. Find another way to fix the-budget, this is not the answer. On Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 12:59:26 PM PST, Johanna<hbl0syoyo@yahoo.com>wrote: HB should never host any event for this long, regardless of what type of event. I truly cannot believe this is even being considered. Please consider us residents over making a dollar. For a group of people who all stated to be opposed to increasing the density of this city, I do not understand how you would approve of an event of this scale and duration that will literally do just that for half of every year. It's not like it's a one off weekend event,which we can deal with occasionally. There are too many issues like environmental impacts that cannot just be repaired. This should be held in a commercial area and much closer to freeways.There will be a significant traffic increase by drivers who don't know the area, as well as an increase of thousands of people per day. That is all why events like Cirque are held in large mall parking lots right off freeways. Not in the center of a residential area. While I do not live in the area of HB that will be most directly affected, I feel for those neighborhoods that will no doubt have many significant negative impacts by this. So I really hope you have informed and talked to those residents extensively and in detail before doing this. Even down the artery streets that will all see a significant daily increase of traffic from people traveling to and from. Regardless of any changes to location, none of our spaces should be taken over for more than a 6-8 week total period for an event.And we as residents should not have to deal with any event that long. I also cannot understand why we even would start a brand new event with that long of a contract,the first year should be a very very short tryout to see what happens and how it impacts this city and residents. What will you do when after just the first week of this your residents start to complain how terrible you've made their lives? Jo From: Betty Kanne To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CM0 STAFF)supolementalcomm(aa surfcity-hb.org Subject Vote NO on item#24 Licensing Agreement to Flowers in the Sky LLC Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:10:46 PM Re: Item#24 25-017 City Council Meeting February 18, 2025 • Council Members, As a 43 year resident,homeowner,park user, nature lover and voter in Huntington Beach I urge you to vehemently reject the proposal to establish and erect a de facto permanent"sound and light" entertainment venue on a last remaining parcel of open green space in Huntington Central Park East. I'm a very active park visitor and regularly visit the broad open spaces surrounding Talbert Lake for birding, exercise and relaxation. This project has no place in HCP. Erecting an expansive, semi-permanent structure on close to six acres of the very scarce remaining open space east of Talbert Lake to accommodate several evenings a week of after- hours paid entertainment is a totally inappropriate squandering of our natural,peaceful open vista green space: It should be flatly rejected. It is an insult to the sanctity of our precious park and to the everyday park visitors who come here for natural spaces. The proposed location is one of one a few remaining open, grassy spaces. We need that open space. The hundreds of species of breeding and seasonally migrating birds that make HCP their home need the open space and unaltered tree access that will be critically diminished by this disruptive venture. The aesthetically offensive eye-sore of this erected venue would be continuously in place night and day just so that a for-profit company can generate revenue a few nights a week over an eight month period possibly extending to four years! The enormous adverse effects to our residents' park make this venture untenable and unacceptable. I urge you to flatly reject it as being inappropriate for our park and its open space mandate. Betty Kanne 16331 Woodstock Lane Huntingtion Beach, CA 92647 bettykanne@hotmail.com From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(1a surfcity-hb.orq Subject Fw:Light show in Central Park Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:19:25 PM Get Outlook for iOS From: Marilyn Konowal<mjkonowal@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 12:45:09 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light show in Central Park F m Soe,people rho received this messae:don'toften get,einall om mjkanowal@grrtail corn I'"am why this important To the City Council of Huntington Beach I greatly oppose the proposed Symphony of Flowers to be placed in Central Park.Such a show would destroy the beautiful landscaping of the park,threaten the wildlife that have made habitats in that area and lastly disrupt the peace and quiet of the citizens who live in the nearby residential areas.The last concern is very distressing to me personally,since I live within walking distance of Central Park.Perhaps the council should consider what it would be like for them to have such a show in their backyard every night for three years. I know the city is in a financial crisis,but please find an alternative method of raising revenue and keep our beautiful - Central Park alone. Marilyn Konowal 50 year plus Huntington Beach resident and home owner and registered voter. From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCa)surfcity-hb.org Subject: Fw:Central Park Light Show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:19:52 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Chuck Burns<dad2st@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 11:20:41 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Central Park Light Show Some penpie who received tftis message don toften get email from dad st a gma i£cr�m tearn why this is tm ortart I support this proposal to utilize the park to generate revenue for the city. A reply will be appreciated. Thank you Chuck Burns From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject Fw:Light Show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:20:33 PM Get Outlook for iOS From: Lynda Muir<lynda.f.muir@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 9:53:49 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from lynda.f.muir@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] I am opposed to the light show in our park.It is a terrible idea.It is detrimental to the wildlife and to all the restoration done to the park.Please DO NOT VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS TERRIBLE PROPOSAL! 60 year resident Lynda Muir Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(@surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Fw:Lights Project Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:21:01 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Gail Brown <iramitla@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 8:58:18 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Lights Project You all understand that many citizens of Huntington Beach are asking for relief from building a Santa Monica,type coastal city. We want reduced noise ,less traffic and continued open space. We want to hold on to passive surroundings with less high rise buildings and more integrity in building in old communities. Yes,the past matters and we must confront and challenge change we see as slowly taking away a positive community setting and lifestyle. STOP taking, renting parkland which provides comfort for all ages and a place to revisit our past and cling on to a peaceful lifestyle. We are afraid this is the beginning of an erosion of our open space, filling it with commercialism and greed. Some things should simply not be compromised. PLEASE do not ok the light show., in the name of needed revenue, Thank you for taking the time to consider this request. --Gail From: Levin.Shannon To: supplementalcommCa)serfcity-hb.orq Subject: Fw:NO on the Central Park light show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:21:25 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Tracy Luth <p.luth@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 8:32:37 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Hb City Council Communication <citycouncil@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: NO on the Central Park light show I am writing again to express my disagreement with your plans to put a light show and fences in Central Park. You have been informed several times that putting up fences and shutting off the water for essentially 3 years will damage and kill most of the trees, flowers and shrubs in the area.Volunteers along with city employees (I assume) have spent ten years restoring this area. So much for "we will protect our parks" on your campaign signs.There are plenty of beach and commercial parking lots that a light show can be set up on. Again, such a disappointing city council....elections will come around again and I for one will remember. Tracy Luth Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomnasurfcity-hb.orq Subject Fw:Light show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:21:45 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:johszfmly@aol.com<johszfmly@aol.com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 7:48:50 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light show Some people who received Ills message don`toften get,ema�l fr©m Johszfmiy@adi cam 1 earn why this is Jmpoitant r,k i it. ,. ,�w� .„, _, . ' �,� .. ,. .._ First, thank you for what you do for our city. I voted for all of you to be in your offices. That being said, PLEASE do not enter into a contract for a light show in our park. A park is not a venue. That park is enjoyed by citizens of our city and visitors. What you are proposing will probably not go over well with most people. True I do not have all the details, but I cannot imagine how this will be successful. I am not against light shows. I recall fondly the one at the Griffith Park Observatory years ago. There has to be other ways to bring revenue to our city. By definition, a park is a large public green area used for recreation. Recreation will be limited for three years. What about the Civil War reenactment that brings in people from all over California? The Huntington Beach Historical Society depends on the revenue for this event, and the Revolutionary War reenactment. I appreciate your conservative vision for our city. This however, I believe will not be good for the city, this light show. City workers and volunteers have done so much to make the park beautiful. Please, do not undo what they have done to help beautify our city. Thank you for taking the time to read this. I suspect you will receive many emails from others who believe this light show in the park is not a good idea for our city. Lynn Johsz From: Levin,Shannon To: suoolementalcomm )surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Fw:Light Show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:22:13 PM Get Outlook for iOS. From:terryagriffin <terryagriffin@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 4:26:32 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show Some peopie=who received this messageadontofteri get email from terryagriffin@verizon r et }a rr v+hythrs i imEaartant PLEASE not at Central Park. I have been one of your Faithful supporters on EVERYTHING. PLEASE DONT APPROVE THIS. Thank you. Terry Griffin BB Resident Sent from my Verizon,Samsung Galaxy smartphone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCaisurfcity-hb.orq Subject Fw:The light show in Central Park Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:23:09 PM Get Outlook for iOS From: Kathy Haney<hbhaney@hotmail.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 11:42:20 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:The light show in Central Park Some.people who receiveed this message don t�oftenzget email from hbhaney@hotmall corn Learn`why this important s No,no, no to the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park!! I am writing to join in with the many citizens of Huntington Beach who are wholeheartedly against this monstrosity. Every single HB resident I have spoken to is against this horrible idea. Every post I have seen about this is against it. I have never seen any proposal that has had this much negative response from HB residents on both sides of the fence. How you could possibly go against the vast majority is beyond me. You were all elected to listen to and support the citizens' opinions. DO NOT OKAY THIS PROPOSAL!!! We do not want or need this event which will have so much negative impact on our beautiful Park. Kathy Haney From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(alsurfdty-hb.orq Subject Fw:Central Park light show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:23:26 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Annie Kelly<akkelly45@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 11:24:55 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Central Park light show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from akkelly45@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificationi City council members, I am adamantly against any type of light show in our Central Park.It is an awful idea. You cannot simply sacrifice eagles, owls,monarch butterflies and all the migratory birds who travel through our coast and city every year for a few dollars.This is part of what makes Huntington Beach an awesome place to live and to visit. Please be an advocate for our all of our city residents human and animal. Thank you Annie Kelly Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suaolementalcomrrasurfcity-hb.org Subject: Fw:registered voter here-no light show in the park please Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:23:40 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:C<cielo8@pm.me> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 9:41:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:registered voter here-no light show in the park please 1:7—Sorr;e1':-Pea-P7te::+who9-''.7'0,ived-this message don't often gef email from ael� @pm me fgarn why ihi 5-mpor Cant registered voter here no light show in the park please I enjoy my walks in the park, and taking pics of the flora and fauna-at all times of the year. Having something like that would disrupt so many things. I have heard the blue birds' boxes would be disrupted. Please don't do that. A friend of mine handles that in another part of OC, it is really a big deal. People know Huntington Beach as Surf City-not Light Show Land. I can give many reasons as to why NOT, i can't think of 1 reason For. thanks for listening carol armstrong From: Levin.Shannon To: suoplementalcommAsurfaty-hb.orq Subject Fw:NO on Symphony of Flowers.. Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:23:54 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Gino J. Bruno<gbruno@socal.rr.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 9:33:12 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: Hopkins,Travis<thopkins@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: NO on Symphony of Flowers. . . TO THE CITY COUNCIL, Huntington Beach . . . The residents are well aware of the fiscal problems facing our City over the next number of years. Please don't try to balance our City budget by destroying premier portions of our parks. Oppose the proposed Symphony of Flowers in Central Park. Thank you. Gino J. Bruno Huntington Beach From: Levin.Shannon To: suDDlementalcommCa�surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Fw:Central Park Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:24:23 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Gerald Donohue<gdonohue41@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:33:57 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Central Park -77 5om ogle vvho reserved this message don tofte n gel email from gdonobue41@gmail corn r' u ., important We have the most beautiful urban park in Orange County and now you want to cover 6 acres with lights? I live by HUntington Harbor and you can see the bright lights from the Sports Complex 3 miles away, Birds use the park as it is located on the Pacific Flyway and dark nights are already difficult for them to find in Huntington Beach. Thank you, Jerry Donohue, 16806 Redwing Ln.HB 92649 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm( surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Fw:Light Show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:24:45 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Sharon Elstran <elstran@icloud.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:06:15 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from elstran@icloud.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification Please don't approve the light show in our beautiful park. We don't need it and don't want to draw more crowds to our city. Sent from my iPad From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(a surfcity-hb.orq Subject Fw:Light show disapproval Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:24:57 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Carol Pilgrim <carol.pilgrim@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:06:12 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light show disapproval Some people why received this message don torten get emaihfram carofpaignri gmaik GamPltar'n why this rs � rmportartt Dear Council, As avid supporters and taxpayers of this city for over 50 years, we're apalled at the plans for this lightshow that will disrupt the natural environment of one of the City's few natural open spaces providing habitat for many species. I urge you to withdraw this proposal that will have negative impacts on the park,neighborhood and wildlife.Both my husband and I have been supportive and voted for each of you, but this proposal crosses the line and will cause damage that far surpasses any revenue provided. We will be watching closely and will reevaluate where our votes go as to how this proposal is addressed. We propose that you fmd an alternative to bring funds into the city. Sincerely, Carol and Thomas Pilgrim From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(@surfdty-hb.org Subject Fw:Central Park Ligjt show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:25:12 PM Get Outlook for iOS From: Lynn Smith <lynnwerlingsmith@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 8:03:15 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Central Park Ligjt show Some People who,reserved this messagedonEtaften get email'from lynnwerlrngsmrth@grh4com earn why this Is Important I am NOT r of the proposed light show at Cnetral Park. It does not serve the people who enjoy the pristine surroundings of the park and will damage the existing foliage. Lynn Smith 71r-351-0530 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomrrasurfcity-hb.orq Subject Fw:Flower Light Show Date: Friday,February 14,2025 1:25:23 PM Get Outlook for iOS From:Susan Matthewson <sgmatthewson@socal.rr.com> Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 7:15:28 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Flower Light Show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from sgmatthewson@socal.rr.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification The flower light show in Central Park is a very bad idea.Please be forthcoming about the vendor and the financial arrangements and which City Council members will be benefitting financially or in other ways from this boondoggle.Do you realize the damage to the park,the cost of repairing it,and the loss of use for 8 months by this idiotic idea. Who in their right mind could possibly think this is a good idea? Sent from my iPhone From: 7aft.iennifer icloud.com To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject Light show may violate law Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 7:14:51 AM [You don't often get email from zaft.jennifer@icloud.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentiftcatiou] Sent from my iPhone The City Council is so crass-obviously not funded locally by people who care about the community. A three year electronic air show contract? This will disturb nesting animals that are protected under federal law. And we insist they change the"Alluring"on the MAGA plaque to"Apolitical"so it's obvious how infantile the CC is. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date:, 2/18/2025 Agendaltern:No, 24 (25-017) From: Judy Morris To: suoolementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Items 20-Library Plaque&24-Flowers of the Sky Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 7:25:21 AM Item 20-Library Plaque Public libraries should be apolitical.Names of City Council members and politically appointed Library Services Commission members do not belong on this plaque. The MAGA acronym and"in God We Trust"are not appropriate to include on a plaque that purports to commemorate 50 years of public library services, by any stretch of the imagination. The current city council has not been supportive of HBPL. They have been openly critical of educated, highly experienced librarians' choices regarding the childrens' book collection by alleging that there was pornographic material in the children's library,but have yet to identify any such material. One council member has gone so far as to publicly insinuate that a former council member was a pedophile because he stated he would not hesitate to read a book the current council member referred to as a"pedophile's dream"to his own child. City Council's recent e-mails to residents requesting feedback about their"petition signing experience" appear to be an attempt to block a legal, democratic grass roots effort to simply keep the treasured HBPL as it currently exists. Why not request community input in advance, or have a contest for residents to submit their ideas to showcase the library rather than creating a promotional tool for the current City Council and Library Commission members?This was a missed opportunity for the City Council to attempt to unite rather than continuing to divide the community. There is no doubt the library is, and has always been a wonderful place for children. Apparently the folks whose names are listed on the plaque aren't aware that adults are also welcome to utilize and enjoy the library. This plaque is an abomination rather than a commemoration. Item 24-Flowers of the Sky I believe the 6-8 month length of time that this project will occupy space within Central Park, and the resulting foot and automobile traffic would be excessive activity for our beautiful park and surrounding areas. Maximum projections of 900 visitors and 300 vehicles per show at 4 shows per night will likely create many traffic log jams in the surrounding areas and a great deal of foot traffic within the park. This project will undermine the natural habitat and peaceful nature of the park that residents of Huntington Beach deserve. Please do not approve the project. Judy Morris 31 year resident of Huntington Beach From: Maria Sugrane5 To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.orq Subject: City Agenda Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 9:30:14 AM 1) $7,000 for a plaque is ridiculous. Don't do it. 2) A light show in Central Park will disturb our prized habitat. Move it to the beach. 3) Accept the petitions the citizens of HB signed. Move on from this issue. 4) Please pay attention to city issues not national ones Maria Sugranes HB homeowner since 1973 From: Michele Burgess To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.org;CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFFZ Subject: 2/18/25 City Council Meeting,Agenda Item#24,File#25-017 Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 12:43:54 PM DO NOT approve and authorize the execution of a License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC, for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers at Huntington Central Park East located at 18381 Goldenwest Street. To the City Council: In spite of numerous concerns and complaints from city residents, you've forged ahead and produced a revised contract for the Symphony of Flowers. 1. Central Park East is supposed to be a passive park space, a people's park, not monetized for long periods — like up to 8 months a year for 3 years. Even though the shows are planned for only a few days a week from dusk onward, a very large area will be closed to the public 24-7. According to the map on Page 13_of the report, an 8-foot fence surrounding the event site may render large portions of footpaths unusable, will block views of the open space, and will be an eyesore in an otherwise natural landscape. 2. There was no Measure C analysis by staff and no public discussion by the City Council. 3. How can the expansive grassy area withstand being covered and/or trampled on for 8 months a year? And then "returned to its original condition" for just a few months before being covered and trampled again? 4. Have the surrounding residents and businesses been notified about potential adverse impacts? 5. Most importantly, this event would be disruptive to birds and wildlife, one of the main reasons people visit, as evidenced by the comments and photos on Google, which summarizes this way: "Idyllic park great for bird- watching. Full of open fields, trees and flowers, this sprawling 350-acre park is great for picnics and strolling." Please take a look at the additional reviews below before you decide to wreck Central Park East for years for a few thousand dollars. Approving this event would be a travesty. The only good thing about "Symphony of Flowers" is its name. Michele Burgess Huntington Beach resident since 1961 p� l 4 Y vya �, fy y`t yM�}�' .A„, ild�f!'.Yrxi ��tFFt aaaaaaCCCCCC 3 ^%^ q� F .F� ,YJ' 7 3'm"" 'G4 R''ffi Jf ^,z4''.3"a, ?, 'Sp'"78"T , - . "'w y a L , ... f ,,,r, r''''`}p^'ze �. V.*,�.,� 4r ,t . r � ��yy to itii ° '. ° K Z 5,i ,,a,,,, ilf ,.1, „1,,,,,....5,,!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,- ...::,.. ...,,..:,.-,:,...,,,....,......,..,...,....,,,,Iii::.% 414:0144004-evtiost*:, ' - --, - 441441r:X Y* : . ,y [ a a "y.Y .: r'?' yyp004y4 y ( ktlrfl9it* 3.k yp A -Y ,^ .'.r ; _"2 . °' ge� «,.aw.. -p is. : ^t 3 •k • op,,•• `^.0 el ° . lmr- ,. d e r te: . Y ' A'lob-�''e 'x -3.. t y. ,,- 1.14*; its3:::::, s1 .yy��: i .ir ae'iiK.., ,"1,:',.gii--iv .. ,pt ?rtil -,:i4,g,,,:a..0, ,I ,,,,,..,,,.,- ,,,,,,,,,,,,, -,, :,,,,,,A,:, , A .,,g . Iv ,f,..,..x,,i,„,t4, •,, .7.-----•:--itt .,;,..„ -a-.Tt-t-' ;-...-A-41 , ''14 .' j'4 1---,,,A.,, .f•I*4.',-. .-.' :it ,t,,,,... .„. pr.,2(Q,.,,,,,,,.v.,,,tios, i,.:, -1,11.4 ...40...,2,1,,,,,401 ...,:, ..:,. ::::„ fi ,:!: . , , ., ,. „ft , :4;....,r,,„:,,,,;!, tv.., ;4, ,,,7.,... ,,,,,, ..„ .,„; i,. ...,:.. .",t,.., zti.i.,, ,,..,..„ i: ..-„,..,.,,,,,-.1,--a;:* 1!.74t,,,,t711, '.::11;4..!,i '.,,E.-„, "9 ' *4.-' '"4'.i,..f,:,:i-4 rr .ii,try.44 : _, .., — , . , 11'*;!1.-1,41:-:;''''' '''.•''.:4;':'''''--: 11 :1'4'' ii, ' l'.:.; . 'i—4 s.4tt.. , �u 3 i ': ° ° a ;s,11„,„ ,,,„:1I ;,!,,,,t :,. A.K4....vil " , ..T, t. . .,,g,..1-4,t. 1.4.,t't 1 I ,4 .1 .'eic.:i-:'..• y.-ke4N• -- •,,,,A .All us t ,f . i .< te, .. £ • :. €x '. it �' �}s y, Yu '„ sac 6,� ►A ,; Via. s..` rr.. .:.x., t_ .... :, au" 5 s a o�?,�ILa 1.4 N[ ki-ti*, 1-?. •it. 1, t 4,?,:ittAti t;,'.,..1 ,\!)-..,-..ii.sr Xi% ' liii .f 'a *� J� l ,� 2IJItIJIJI f�k-.Li3 < .4.! a £ rs X S'''' . l':.', , il fe7.5,41,', .!.,wf,',. '''A',...,1g',.-,';' ! ':'... ''',..' A: lit 7,4:51., ir.,,,,,,,,,, :, 4c, : � 3 qllHjJpp From: Andrew Einhorn To: suoDlementalcomm(a)surfcity-hb.orq Subject Lighting up central Park is RECKLESS Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 12:56:18 PM Attention JIB Council, Your latest absurdity—lighting up Central Park—is a reckless, disruptive, and unnecessary stunt. It will disturb residents, drive away wildlife, and damage park infrastructure. Charging $35 per ticket plus $15 for parking for a measly 15-30 minute show? That's outrageous. Your revenue projections are completely unrealistic, and this entire scheme is just another poorly thought-out cash grab at the expense of our community. Andrew Einhorn, 40-year resident of HB - P.S. Why do we have council members who vape during meetings making decisions for our city? You're an embarrassment. From: drynersoneearthlink.net To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF);supplementalcomm(alsurfdty-hb.orq Subject 2-18-25 Council Meeting Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 2:00:04 PM As the city council considers items 22 and 23 regarding the two petitions to protect our library on the agenda for February 18th,you have choices to make. You can simply accept the actions requested by the petitions,you can put the items on the next general election ballot,or you can call for a special election for those ballot measures. Let's take agenda item 22,the request to repeal the ordinance that created the book review committee,first. The ordinance has been in place since March of 2024,yet that commission does not exist, nor has it done any work. Given that you have a stated goal to make the government more efficient and to cut costs, clearly the most appropriate choice for this item is to simply accept and adopt what the petitions request:the deletion of Chapter 2.66 of title 2, i.e.,the abolishment of the Community Parent Guardian Review Board. That decision essentially costs the city nothing to implement and actually saves money by not having to buy multiple copies of books for review. It also streamlines operations by removing the minimum twice a year commission review process that could easily take over a year to approve or reject a book. The second most responsible decision you can take is to simply decide to put the measure on the next general election ballot. Again, since the commission does not exist and is performing no work,there is no negative impact on operations,and putting a ballot measure on a general election ballot is the least expensive path to a city-wide election. Calling for a special election is the most expensive option,and,given the city's financial straits,clearly an irresponsible choice. The choices for item 23 regarding public operation of the library system are much the same. Accepting what the petitions request has zero financial impact unless the council once again tries to outsource library operations. And given that the library's operational costs are a very small percentage of the city's budget, it's not the most fruitful place to look for cost savings. Perhaps you might look at the city attorney's office whose personnel cost increased 35%since 2022 and whose primary attorney has amongst the highest compensation of any municipal attorney in the state. Once again,the second most responsible action is to place the measure on the next general election ballot. As with item 22,the most cost-effective method to hold an election is the council chooses not to accept the first option. And, like with item 22, choosing to call for a special election is the most expensive and least responsible choice to make. (And we all remember that you chose to spend an extra$300K- $400K to put measures A, B,and C on the primary ballot, rather than waiting for the general election.) So we will all be watching closely to see if you really care about being fiscally responsible, or if it's just a buzzword you like to use to attack programs that don't knuckle under to you,while ignoring the fiscal implications of things you like. Next, on to item 20—the supposed 50th Anniversary Library Plaque. By now, it cannot be lost on you the amount of outrage that the public has over this abomination of a plaque. Fully 90% of the speakers at the Library and Community Services Commission meeting opposed the plaque in its current form. Supplemental communications were essentially universal in their condemnation. No one is opposed to a plaque celebrating our library—that's what the plaque is supposed to do. The proposed plaque had zero public input, is a massive departure from established design guidelines,violates the library own posting guidelines, and is a celebration of your political point of view—not a celebration of our library. You may think this is some clever one-up on your political opponents, but it's really just another wedge creating more divisiveness in our city. You should be ashamed. Finally,we come to the Flowers of the Sky proposal—item 24. You saw the public outcry when you tried to slide it through on the consent calendar. You have taken little, if any,of the feedback you received. There have been no public meetings, no discussion of how noise, light, and parking will affect the surrounding neighborhoods and wildlife. The EIR amendment glibly states that lights and speakers are"angled away"from neighborhoods. That shows a fundamental misunderstanding of wave theory and how sound and light propagate,which is omnidirectionally. It also seems to state that, because mats are being used for the walkway, no damage to the area will occur. Really? How about the grandstands,the water basin for the fountains,the walls or fences to partition the area off from the rest of the park? How can these items be in place for eight months of the year without doing damage? How was the$50,000 restoration fee calculated? Is that per year,or over the three-to-four-year life of the contract? What recourse does the city have if the restoration is not up to snuff? You were encouraged to consider other sites. I see no evidence that you have done so. The only change I see from your previous attempt is that there is now a contract for us to review. What I don't see is any financial analysis the suggests what the net revenue the city can hope to gain from this event. And I emphasize net revenue, because, like in the airs how settlement,you are committing the city to provide parking, parking attendants and enforcement, public safety, etc. So,we are incurring expenses for the benefit of the promoter, but I don't see anywhere those expenses are explicitly covered. They apparently are supposed to come out of our revenue from ticket sales and parking, but I see no analysis for the citizens to review. And frankly,with at least two other similar established shows within easy driving distance, I'd like to see some market analysis on the appetite for such shows. Three to four shows a night for six months every year for three years is over a million people a year—more than three times the total population of Huntington Beach. What evidence do you have that there's a market for 3-4 million visitors for this show? Maybe the decision should be based on something a bit more factual than the fact that Tony's consultant buddy from Ventura brought this to the city council. David Rynerson From: Mary To: suoplementalcomm(aa surfcity-hb.orq Subject Feb 18 Agenda Items Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 3:09:47 PM [ " 77-7' rtex 1� "t You don t often getemail from sassyone552@gmail corn l earn=why thrs is important I am opposed to any city plaques becoming political,regardless of party. Don't politicize our library. Everyone I have spoke to is against this travesty to our beautiful Central Park. You will not be popular if this gets approved. The park is a place for peace and serenity.Not a light show.Not to mention the disturbance to the wildlife. Please listen to your constituents. From: Shauohn Hamman To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.orq Subject No light show! Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 5:04:02 PM Yau d t ofte a get err a l from shaugh 7@grrrail Corr earn why this iss importan To whom it may concern, Please do not bring the light show to Central Park. Shaughn Hamman From: Caroline Brandenburaer To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO SfAFFI;supolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject Say No to the Central Park Light Show Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 7:02:36 PM I'm vehemently opposed to the Symphony of Flowers at Central Park Huntington Beach.I don't care how much money is made from it.Our Central Park wildlife is worth more than that.Leave the park alone! Do not disturb all the gorgeous and precious wildlife at Central Park.Find a different way to make money for HB. Caroline B From: Suzanne Hart To: suoplementalcomm(alsurfdty-hb.orq Subject Flower Show Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 7:03:13 PM I am writing to you in opposition of contracting for the Flower Show in our beloved Central Park. I am stunned that you would even consider such an abomination since, as I recall , your campaign slogans contained verbiage such as "Save Our Parks!" and "Protect the Environment!" Were these statements simply a way to get votes while knowing all along that they were disingenuous? Surely you must realize that this would ruin whole ecosystems and habitats for eagles, hawks, owls and migrating birds? How do you think the large, decades old trees will survive without water for eight months? Surely it couldn't be that you just don't care? Please vote to oppose to show your constituents that you do, indeed, care! Our Central Park is a treasure and sanctuary to our city and it is unthinkable that you would deliberately seek to destroy it. Thank you, Suzanne Hart, 27 year resident From: Mary Thompson To: supolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Central Park Lightshow Date: Saturday,February 15,2025 7:21:12 PM [You don't often get email from marythompson848@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at bttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentiftcatiozi] I'm writing to express my concern over the Council's consideration of the light show.I live near the park and I don't want it! For a number of reasons,it's a really bad idea! This is our beautiful park;a crown jewel of our city.DON'T RUIN IT! This is not the appropriate venue for this event!!!! Mary Thompson HB resident for 48 years Sent from my iPhone From: Julie Bixby To: suoplementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Re:Coundl agenda 2/18/2025,multiple items Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 7:46:41 AM ,T '1 7,750.7c--,1,9154,it''' You do `t b t get l from uhe�a y c�rg Learn why this is importari To Council persons of all genders, faiths and creeds: RE: Item 25-102 - Design of Library Anniversary Plaque The City Council is blatantly using a City resource for its own political gain. The font size of the front-and-center MAGA acrostic is so much larger than that of"Huntington Beach Central Library", and there's so much star- spangled fluff around it, that the plaque looks like it's recognizing 50 years of MAGA, a well-known political movement, rather than the City's Library. Further adding to the plaque's political message, it displays the individual names and offices of the loud and proud MAGA elected officials. The City's Code of Ethics - you did read it, didn't you? - says "I do not use my office or the resources of the City for personal or political gain." Plastering a political logo/acronym with your name and office on a City resource sounds very much like using a City resource for political gain, which violates the Code of Ethics. RE: Items 25-087 & 25-126 pertaining to placing the Citizens Initiatives on the ballot Deputy City Manager Jennifer Carey, who prepared these two RCAs, gets creative - to put it politely - with the fiscal impact of placing the citizen initiatives on the General Election ballot. She writes for both 25-087 & 25- 126: "The next General Election would be November 3, 2026. Should the City Council elect to submit for this date, the cost would range from $340,515 to $399,499. If the City Council decides to include the second citizen initiative... an additional cost of approximately $8,500 would be incurred for both scenarios." This makes it sound like the cost of including a single initiative on a GE ballot is an astounding six figures, yet somehow tacking on a second initiative adds a mere $8,500. This is a false narrative. Less than a year ago, the text of a similar RCA, 24-465, which was co-written by Carey, read simple and clear: "The estimated additional cost to place one Charter amendment measure on the November 5, 2024 General Election ballot is $10,000, bringing the total estimated cost for the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election to $310,000. (emphasis added) Funds to cover this amount are budgeted in FY 2024/25 Election Account No. 10010201.69505." How in the world did the cost of adding one item to a GE ballot go from $10,000 to $300,000+ in less than a year? It didn't, although the phrasing of the current RCAs implies that it did, thereby misleading the public (and possibly the Council) that adding just one ballot initiative would be an enormous expenditure it can't afford. Moreover, RCAs 25-087 & 25-126 don't mention that funds are always provided in the City's budget to cover basic General Election costs, expanding the false narrative that the City can't afford to put the (supposedly costly) citizen initiatives on a GE ballot. Had the current RCAs been written in the same clear verbiage as the prior 24-465, this false impression wouldn't exist. The City Council needs to stop playing games and stop fabricating excuses (including the "were you lied to" survey) to avoid placing the lawfully submitted citizen initiatives on the 2026 General Election ballot. RE: Item 25-017 — Flowers of the Sky License Agreement I'm disturbed by the City's selling out of its parkland to try to make a quick buck. The ends don't justify the means. I'm also particularly dismayed by the vendor's obligation of."Shall provide a complimentary hospitality package that includes 400 complimentary VIP hospitality passes for the event per year for use by City's employees and representatives." 400 VIP passes per year? It seems a rather excessive number of freebies being doled out. It also begs the question of how, exactly, these hundreds of yearly freebies serve "a legitimate public purpose of the City... consistent with state law"per Resolution No. 2013-23. (emphasis added) Requiring the distribution of 400 VIP passes sounds awfully like bribery to me, a "pay to play" scheme (aka, we'll let you hold your event if you give us a bucket load of free passes to attend it). The City doesn't need to be so greedy. Cutting the number of passes in half to 200 (or cutting even fewer to 100), you still have a generous allotment for whatever "legitimate public purpose" premise you come up with. Julie Bixby Huntington Beach From: )en Bledsoe To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF);suoolementdalcommCa surfdty-hb.orq Subjecb Library plaque Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 8:33:05 AM Some people who received this message.don!toften get email from jenbiedsoe66@gmall.com.Learn why this'is important Hello, I am writing to voice my objection to the proposed plaque in honor of the library's 50th. As for the plaque,the presence of the eagle at the center top bears distinct resemblance to the symbol of the luftwaffe (hopefully this was a mistake). The actual library logo is quite small, and I see that you intend to enshrine your names on the plaque which is meant to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the library. The black and gold color selection is offensive as well (proud boys colors,hopefully also a mistake, and not a pattern when considered together with the eagle). To cry about budget shortfalls,while wasting money on this disingenuous "commemoration" in an attempt to flex is petty and divisive. For a town who relies on tourist dollars, I hate to see our city in the national news for stunts like this. As for the library petitions, I have not received the emails that others have which question whether those who signed were misinformed or misled as to the contents of the petitions. Nor have I received phone calls questioning the same. So,I'd like to get out in front of that: I knowingly signed both petitions,having read their contents ahead of time. Please stop stalling and obfuscating. The signatures were in excess of the number needed, and the OC Registrar of Voters certified. This should proceed to the next step. Please do the will of the people. And I'm still opposed to the proposed light show in Central Park,though I appreciate Casey's response to my prior email. Jennifer Bledsoe From: cornetto45(aa earthlink.net To: supolementalcomm(a surtcity-hb.orq;CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CM0 STAFF) Subject item 24,25-017 Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 9:27:29 AM Dear City Council The proposed income from the Symphony of Flowers is very small, The minimum value of $150,000 is insignificant. But even if it made 10 times that,with$1,500,000(1.5 million dollars)it is insignificant compared to the amount of money needed for our infrastructure problems. It is insignificant to the cost of holding a municipal election that requires voter ID. Furthermore,the EIR report underestimates the impact on birds that are in the park. And it will impact the civil war history efforts. Please do not approve the Symphony of Flowers. Charlie Jackson, a 23 year resident of Huntingtin Beach From: Mark Tonkovich To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Flowers of Light and Library plaque Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 9:27:30 AM Dear Mayor Burns,Mayor Pro Tern McKeon and City Council members, Hope you all are doing well. This e-mail reflects the thoughts of my wife,son and I,two homeowners in HB. We do not feel it is proper of Symphony of Flowers to take over a good portion of our Central Park.This is not a small task and will deprive us of this area of the park for months upon end.It will disrupt the use of the park and have an effect on the surrounding area. Please do not enact this. As for the library plaque,We voted for Trump 3 times,I have several MAGA hats and Trump flag.We voted for all of you too.As much as I agree with MAGA, we do not feel its incorporation into the plaque is the right thing to do, it actually seems immature.We recommend redesign it without the MAGA. We also feel the library petitions are just wasting our taxes.How much was spent on signature verification?If,in fact,this has to move forward,use the least costly method,a General Municipal Election,not a special election to cut our losses. Thank you for the consideration. Best, Mark Tonkovich and family. From: Kristina Mahan To: CITY COUNCIL CINCL,CMO STAFF);suoolementalcomrrasurfcity-hb.orq Subject Opposition to light show Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 10:35:29 AM Hello city council, I am writing in strong opposition of the proposed light show being installed at Central Park. We need to value our open spaces that thousands of people use every day. We have many protected species who call our park home. Additionally, our park is on the migratory path of many bird species, including the Bald Eagle.Disrupting these creatures will be an enormous shame on our city. I understand the purpose for wanting this light show is to bring in revenue to help balance our woeful budget deficit. You can only blame yourselves for the state of our budget.And you are decreasing tourism to our area as many people do you want to come here due to your MAGA leadership. In fact, many locals also do not spend their money here. Instead of spending our money on your pet MAGA projects,why don't you work on improving our infrastructure and protecting our open spaces and wildlife?You know, like a real city council should be doing. And get your stupid MAGA plaque off our library. You don't deserve it. Kristina Mahan From: Linda Mendez To: supolementalcomm(a)surfcity-hb,orq Subject NO!!!!!! Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 11:13:59 AM [You don't often get email from Iin.mendez7@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at bttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiou I am definitely against the plaque you intend to place in OUR library.It should be from the citizens of this city,not from seven who blatantly brag and push their political beliefs. Also,PLEASE!!An electronic light show on our beautiful park and charge us to see it??? NO!!NO!lN00000!!!!!! Sent from my iPhone From: Ginnv Bean To: suoolementalcamm(a surfcity-hb.orq;CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF1 Cc: Ginnv Bean Subject: Library and Central Park Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 11:47:48 AM Y,ou dart often get ernai€from ginnybean1969@aol corn Learn why this is important Dear City Council Members: First, the acronym MAGAi.I I cannot even believe that you would even think this design is right to celebrate the 50 years the library has been open. I as with many other citizens whether they are Republican or Democrat are appalled at this design. The Library is a beautiful landmark in our city and to use the MAGA reference is very inappropriate. Our Library should not be affiliated or referenced to a political party. It should be recognized for all the good it has done in our community. This is an insult to all the citizens and the programs that our beautiful library has provided our city. Second, after reading many comments of Facebook and Nextdoor regarding using "a public park" for a light show and how it will affect the park and the land, I am against using this as a venue for profit (but not much) for that many months out of the year. I walk this part a couple of times a week and will hate to see it used for this type of venue. Mr. Steve Engel and his many volunteers have spent and continue to spend enormous amount of time making the park look beautiful. Many of you ran for CC on platforms to protect our Library and Our Parks, please remember that when you're ready to vote. But unfortunately, many of your citizens that you represent feel that you will already have your mind up before starting the meeting. Please listen to the comments and the emails that you will be receiving, we all want what's best for our hometown. Sincerely, Ginny (Virginia) Bean - a 48 year resident of HB 714-325-5240 15892 Malm Circle Huntington Beach, CA 93647 From: Sue Welfrinoer To: supolementaloommr@surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Oppose 25-017/Light Show in Central Park Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 2:19:23 PM Dear Mayor and City Council Members, While I love the idea of special events to promote tourism to our Surf City USA community, I am not 100%sure I can support this event in our Central Park and so I need to add my voice to those who oppose it. I watched at the October?Council meeting when there was a lovely presentation about the light show and I loved the idea of bringing an artistic event to our city. In the end, however, I respect the voices of Steve Engel,Jean Nagel, and so many others who have tirelessly worked to make our park the gem it is. If you can convince the Tree Society and all the hardworking volunteers that this will not negatively impact the park,then I would support it. Please listen to their. valid concerns. Sincerely, Sue Welfringer HB Resident since 1997 From: Michelle Larsson To: suoolementalcomm( surfcity-hb.orq;Alicia Dose-Wild Subject: Fwd:Central Park light&sound show Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 4:06:14 PM .. ., " You dory t oftent fromm misunstca@hotmaii corn i»am why th:s �trrporta ,x To all members of the current council, I have voted for each and every one of you based on my presumption that you use common sense behind your decisions. Please don't make me regret my faith in your representation. I generally read at least 85%of Agenda Items for every meeting and don't recall any mention of a Light& Sound show using Central Park as a location slated for a vote. If the information that I just received TODAY for the first time regarding your being in favor of this proposal is correct,PLEASE USE YOUR COMMON SENSE. Vote against this proposal. It's bad enough that we are barraged every night after 9pm from the Disneyland Fireworks sounds. We all know how far away Disneyland is from PCH. I respectfully would appreciate an update from EACH of you before your vote on Tuesday. Thank you, Michelle Larsson/Voter/Homeowner/45+year resident/Republican (562)592-1858 17132 PCH#201 HB 92649 From: Shirley To: supolementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: The Flower Show Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 6:18:20 PM You_dan t 6ftep get Where are the defenders of the park that ran with the slogan save our parks, you've left us high and dry with an unwanted show. Leave our parks alone please. Shirley Knopf From: )udv Brusslan To: suoolementalcommCa)surfcity-hb.orq Subject NO on MAGA Library Plaque,NO on Symphony of Flowers,YES on library petitions Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 8:04:07 PM You don`t often get email tram brusslanlab@gmail corn:Learn urhy this is mportan .....,,�.., ......., .. w,. .. .w.°�fiThe MAGA plaque is partisan and our library is not. The Symphony of Flowers will destroy wildlife habitats in our Central Park. The petitions were approved by the OC Registrar and the people in HB should be given the chance to vote on the petitions they signed.I had the ordinance in hand when people signed the petition. They could read the word "PROCUREMENT",this is not moving books,this means not purchasing books. This is the definition of book banning:they cannot be procured by the library. Maybe you need to look up the word "PROCUREMENT"? Thank you, Dr. Judy Brusslan Huntington Beach Resident From: steve enael To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq;CITY COUNCIL,(INCL.CMO STAFFI Subject Please Protect our Parks Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 9:14:01 PM S€�rne peoP(e s o reee� J e bt ti ften get email from st +e sv engel@outlook com Learn why s Dear Huntington Beach City Council and Staff, As a 20 year volunteer in Huntington Central Park I respectfully request that you vote no on the Symphony of Flowers event planned in Huntington Central Park. A 6 month event in our jewel of a park is way too long. HCP was always designed to be a passive park not a long-term - event center. Please follow through on your pledges to Protect Our Beautiful Parks. Here's a few alternative sites; The old Site One Resource Yard The park lot and open field next to the Gothard Bus Terminal State Beach Sunset Beach Marina and boat launch area Westminster Mall Parking Lot Thank you for your attention, Steve Engel From: Thomas Foulkrod To: suoolementalcommCa)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Festival of Flowers Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 11:52:49 PM o on` t . c c et er a3[from torn6kml irccorn Le w" t�r i' ortan We support the Festival of Flowers. Tom Foulkrod, Director Ken Macdonell Investigations Serving Southern California for over 40 Years 310-822-2414 855-822-2414 Toll Free 833-888-2414 Fax 4712 Admiralty Way Ste 132 Marina del Rey, Ca 90292 2973 Harbor Blvd., Ste 112 Costa Mesa, Ca 92626 714-852-3412 http://www.kmi-inc.com From: Margaret Sloan To: suvolementalcommfa surfcity-hb.orq Subject No on Symphony of Flowers Date: Monday,February 17,2025 7:22:09 AM [You don't often get email from peggysloan@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/Learn.A.boutSenderldentification] The proposed Symphony of Flowers is an irresponsible misuse of public land for corporate profit. If this installation were to be put in place,our beautiful Central Park stands to suffer irreparable environmental damage not to mention the displacement of those of us who enjoy and use this section and all other areas of our park on a daily basis. Finally,it is not lost on the responsible residents of our city that the plan at its basest is meant to line the pockets of Council members'political cronies and is the real driving force here. Please do not allow this destructive project to go forward. Best, Peggy Sloan From: JIB Phillio5 To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF) Cc: suoolementalcommla)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Against the Central Park Light Show Date: Monday,February 17,2025 8:34:30 AM You dean t often get ecz i[�ro hbphiilips@verizon nets L earn wh this�s important I am against the proposed Light Show in Central Park. We should not be hosting an event longer than a month. The traffic congestion on residential streets and noise level for residents for 6 months is just unacceptable. Why can't this event take place at the beach since it doesn't impact residents and the parking is far more suitable for large events. We should find ways to balance the budget without forcing thousands of tourists on us;parking on our own "home"streets everyday for multiple months.You know this will happen no matter how much you police the parking situation. I appreciate your consideration. From: Nancy Paradiso To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.org Subject Electronic light show Date: Monday,February 17,2025 8:48:06 AM You don t oftenget emait from nparadtso1987@ginail corn Learn why this is important j Hello I am concerned about all the issues on the agenda but I am particularly concerned about the idea of putting an electronic light show in Central Park. We are so lucky to have a myriad of animals and birds live in our park. They have their babies in our park. Some of these animals are endangered.or can't be seen anywhere else in Huntington Beach.Putting on a light show for months will scare off most of the animals that live there and thereby take away my (and many others) enjoyment of the park. It will also impact the neighborhoods around the park with light pollution. Our Central Park attracts people because they love the serenity and beauty of the park.People love seeing the wildlife that abound there.Please don't destroy it with this ill conceived plan. Thank you, Nancy and Joe Paradiso From: Lindsay K To: suoolementalcommCa)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment,LLC Date: Monday,February 17,2025 9:08:42 AM Hello HB City Council, The proposed agenda item 25-017 which would sell out our public park for nearly 3 years is a mistake. I have a very hard time understanding how the demand for such a program will last for that long or how the amount of money the city will receive in exchange for the disruption of the park space and subsequent park rehabilitation is worth it.The only way it makes sense is if someone or multiple people on the council are getting something in exchange. No one wants this- not even your most fervent supporters. Check the local FB pages! Vote no. Sincerely, Lindsay Klick Mother, HB Resident, Librarian From: Sue Kinaman To: suoplementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Cc: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF) Subject: Opposing Symphony of Flowers Project Date: Monday,February 17,2025 9:57:56 AM a � Sorn9°p pie-wi rec ue f i rrIess g? oeo `eri 9.et email fror ar @gr ar.cogr learn why this is ...,,.._..,,,...,_........... .......<._..„,:,,„,�:,,,.,,„,.„„„..„„ .. .,.:...,„.._,x..,....w.a,....a»,....W:...a.:,.:_, ..,.._.�a;a.MM:aa�.,.u,... ......_..........N..,._a�:m��s--,.�.�....a................ ...._....,..:.a.,.>.,.x�,.µ:.c.�ia City Council, Please do not proceed with the "Symphony of Flowers"project. Central Park is a beloved greenspace that so many people use for walking,bird watching,picnics and parties, even Pokemon Go gatherings. Being able to walk around the whole park is a draw, and cutting off access to parts of it, cutting off irrigation, killing plants, and disturbing so many nesting birds is cruel and irresponsible. Also, where will other city events that are often held there, like the Cherry Blossom Festival, Scouts BSA Camperall, American and Civil War reenactments,take place?How will this impact the Youth Shelter, which is right next door, and outdoor library events that are free to the public? And where will everyone coming to this huge event that will last 8 months of the year go to park?Parking is already tight since the parking area is for access to the park,the library, and the sports complex. This is a very ill thought-out idea. If you want to put in some big money-making overblown tourist attraction,please put it somewhere other than A PUBLIC PARK that is already enjoyed by thousands of residents and costs them no money to enjoy. Purchase an empty lot or parking lot, don't take away public space from the people,plants, and animals who love and enjoy it. Thank you, Sue Kingman Huntington Beach Resident From: Jib Phillio� To: suoplementalcommi surfcity-hb.orq Subject Light Show in Central Park Date: Monday,February 17,2025 10:12:12 AM I am a concerned HB Resident in this area opposed to the Light Show in Central Park. We should not be hosting any event longer than a month regardless of where it is,when it is,or what it is. We should find ways to balance the budget without forcing thousands of tourists on us every day. Find income streams that do not ruin residents quality of life.We already have major problems with traffic,and you are losing out on local year round revenue because residents don't want to deal with tourists. You were elected to fight against having more people forced upon us.That does not just mean building. Thank you for your consideration. From: dfabentleyeamail.com To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Cc: "Diane Bentley" Subject: Vote NO on Symphony of Flowers Proposal! Date: Monday,February 17,2025 10:13:04 AM You don't oftemiget eMair from dfgbentley@grnaii corn Learn why this is important' My name is Diane Bentley,and I am a 24 year resident of Huntington Beach. I am adding my NO vote to the MANY, MANY communications you have already received from HB residents about the ill-advised proposal to place a damaging installation in HB Central Park. It will not only damage the environment of the park for the birds and animals who inhabit the park and the people who enjoy the park on a daily basis, it will disturb the residents for miles around the park with excessive traffic, noise and sound pollution!And it is not even likely to bring in the pitiful amount of revenue that is projected in the proposal,This is a boondoggle with smelly political overtones, and it must not be allowed to pollute our park!Vote NO! From: onewildart(null) To: supplementalcomm(@surfcity-hb.orq;CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CM0 STAFF) Subject: Travesty in the park Date: Monday,February 17,2025 10:23:01 AM City Council Members, Please LISTEN to your constituents.They are telling you they DO NOT want the light show in the park.Beyond the environmental harm it will cause I'm pretty sure HB will not make any money but will no doubt go into debt over this fiasco. Trudy Roe 48 year resident,tax payer&voter Sent from my iPhone From: ciboardman09 To: suoolementalcomm(aisurfcity-hb.org;CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFFS Subject No on Agenda item 24 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 10:31:01 AM .„,,,,7,.,,„2.4„,,„ „, Some peopr who received this message don`t often ge a iall`fromfcon ii 01@gmail corn Learn why hits is important Dear Mayor and Council Members, City.Council@surfcity-hb.org Please vote NO on agenda item 24, a License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment,LLC, for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers. The license agreement allows for the promoter of the show to retain 40%of the parking revenue for the show, despite the fact that the city owns all the land upon which cars will be parked. Given the impacts this show will have upon our park,wildlife in the park, and our residents,the city should at least retain all the parking revenue, and a larger share of concessions and ticket sales. This show is scheduled to impact our park and wildlife habitat from September through March.During this time sensitive migratory bird species use Central Park during both fall and spring migrations. I am requesting a supplemental EIR be done so that the public and agencies such and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife,can review the project and comment on impacts this proposed "Symphony of Flowers"will have on our community and wildlife including threatened species of birds and insects found in Central Park. The public and resource agencies should have an opportunity to make meaningful comments about the wildlife resources in this area, and have their environmental concerns clearly addressed. Specific, clear mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate the impacts of this project need to be described to the public. This did not happen because only an addendum to the 1999 EIR was done instead of a Supplemental EIR. According to the Addendum EIR,this project has over 100,000 luminous flowers, and 500,000 LED lights choreographed to music,to be placed immediately adjacent to habitat used by migratory and nesting birds. There may be as many as four shows a night with up to 900 visitors per show that will run from dusk to 11 PM for 20 nights a month for 6 months. During fall and spring migration birds use this area of Central Park as a resting and feeding area as they migrate to and from wintering and nesting locations. Central Park is an important migratory rest stop for these birds.Migrant birds use the area to rest and feed for days or weeks before moving on in their migration. Most birds migrate at night and are confused by lights. In addition,there are raptors, and a variety of other birds that nest in the area during the spring and summer. I did not see any requirements of bird surveys for sensitive migratory species in the Addendum,nor mitigation measures for sensitive migrant birds in spring and fall. The Addendum EIR on page 29 does state that a qualified biologist will conduct nesting bird surveys within 7 days of the start of avian nesting season defined in the document as between January 15- September 15. That is a huge range of time and birds that nest in late May and June may not even be present at the time a survey is done if the survey is done in January. The Addendum does not indicate how many nesting bird surveys would be done, or if only one will be done in January. This is an example of the type of concerns and comments a Supplemental EIR would have to address that is not addressed in the Addendum, and is an example of why a Supplemental EIR is needed. The Addendum also uses the word "may" in reference to mitigation measures, not the word "shall". The use of the word "may" does not provide anywhere near the protection that the word "shall" does. I think we all know the possibility of the actual enforcement of mitigation measures will be unlikely given they are not required. This project is a huge light show with accompanying music placed directly into habitat. The amplified sounds and bright lights every night for months will have a negative impact on both resident and migratory birds. I remember during the discussion of the housing element, current council members expressed concern about the impact lighting from hypothetical housing could have on birds miles away at the Bolsa Chica Wetlands. Certainly you would have greater concerns about a large light and sound show placed directly into their habitat in Central Park. In addition,the USFWS recently announced plans to list the monarch butterfly as a threatened species before the end of next year. Populations of this iconic butterfly have plummeted for a variety of reasons, including habitat loss. The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation has collected data on monarch populations in California Baja and Arizona for over 25 years. They have found their numbers have dropped by 81%over that time. Monarchs winter in our Central Park in trees near the proposed site for this project. The Addendum does state on page 29 that surveys for wintering monarchs will be done prior to the start of the project. How many surveys will be done?At what time of day will they be done? Monarchs can leave their nighttime roosting areas early in the morning so the time of day the surveys are done is very important.A Supplemental EIR would address these types of questions, but there is no opportunity for these to be answered for the public in the Addendum. A Supplemental EIR would have also evaluated alternative locations for this project. For example, areas such as football stadiums when not being used for football season could provide a less impactful location for this project. Unfortunately for the residents of the city, alternative sites were not evaluated since a Supplemental EIR was not done. Additionally,this project needs a vote of the people to proceed. The agenda item may call what the city is entering into with Flowers of the Sky Entertainment LLC a"license agreement" but in reality the city is leasing 6.29 acres of Central Park to a private party for up to 8 months. This project requires a vote of the people as described in Charter section 612 (see below). Section 6 L2PUBLIC UTILITIES AND PARKS AND BEACHES. (a) No public utility or park or beach or portion thereof now or hereafter owned or operated by the City shall be sold, leased, exchanged or otherwise transferred or disposed of unless authorized by the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the total membership of the City Council and by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the electors voting on such proposition at a general or special election at which such proposition is submitted. Charter section 612 was placed in our charter as a result of a vote of the people in 1990 after that city council proposed monetizing a portion of Central Park by constructing a golf driving range. Similarly,this project would both privatize and monetize a portion of Central Park that right now is a passive use area.Flowers of the Sky Entertainment LLC proposes to charge residents and visitors $25.00 to attend the event. It changes the nature of a passive use area of our park to one of very active use with up to 900 visitors a night for 20 nights a month,between September to March, and denies the residents of Huntington Beach use of 6.29 acres of Central Park for up to eight months in order for a private business to benefit financially. In conclusion,please vote no on this item because: The Addendum to the 1999 EIR is inadequate. In accordance with our City Charter section 612 a vote of the people needs to occur prior to the city allowing Flowers of the Sky Entertainment LLC to lease 6.29 acres of parkland in Central Park. Sincerely, Connie Boardman Former Mayor, City of Huntington Beach From: onewildart To: suaolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq;CITY COUNCIL,(INCL.CM0 STAFF) Subject Fwd:Symphony Of Flowers Date: Monday,February 17,2025 10:33:24 AM To:HB City Council and Supplemental Correspondence Will this nonsense of bringing PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT events,that have the potential to harm our fair city,please stop? Letting a musical/light show use Central Park for a theatrical event that is designed for a 'vast field' (according to its brochure)makes no sense whatsoever. Our park is a haven for all kinds of wildlife. It is a major stopping over spot for migrating birds. A half a million lights and music blaring for 6 months would disrupt and displace breeding, nesting and home for many bird species. You may recall the incident at the Bolsa Chica a few years back when someone flew a drone over the island where the least terns nested and scared them all away. They haven't returned to this day. From: njmannion()verizon.net To: suoo!ementalcommCa)surfdty-hb.orq Subject: In opposition to Symphony of Flowers! Date: Monday,February 17,2025 11:09:57 AM ;7:73N:ITMN"tw E Yost don t ofte r,get ertai from njmannian@venzon net, .earn whythis r p n I am opposed to bringing the event Symphony of Flowers to Central Park. Our Huntington Beach parks are passive areas where residents enjoy walking trails, fresh air, the birds, the butterflies, etc. Central Park should remain a respite for the residents of this city instead of inviting troops of outsiders to trash our prized park. Perhaps you can tell by the huge negative response to your proposal that this is not the place to install a garish light and music show. From: nand carbon To: suoolementalcomm(@surfdty-hb.orq Subject: Three year light show in Central Park Date: Monday,February 17,2025 12:32:39 PM You don`t often et email from ncarbone7629@grnail corn Learn why for + rrnpQrttar s .._ To whom it may concern: Having this light show come to our Central Park would have so many damaging effects on our wildlife, insects and especially the butterflies. Our family and friends are very distraught over this possibly coming to our city. Giving us one more reason to possibly leave our city which we would hate to do, but things are not getting any better here. Please do the right thing for preserving our beautiful nature, that is so important important to all. From: Tonva F. To: suoolementalcommAsurfcity-hb.orq Subject Item#24 25-017 City Council Meeting February 18,2025 Symphony of Flowers License Agreement Date: Monday,February 17,2025 1:38:13 PM tau dtsn,t often getetT ail from t farzr�a c nzaff Dorn Learn why this+s irrr crrtar Dear Huntington Beach Council Members I am a resident and voter in Huntington Beach. I am also a frequent visitor to Huntington Beach Central Park along with many others who visit this park often daily for its beauty, and the peace of mind it brings. Vote No on #24, 25-017 This park is a crown jewel for the city of Huntington Beach. Visitors come from all over to visit because they've heard this park is special. Some walk daily in this park for their mental and physical health. Many come to experience the incredible wildlife that thrives in this park. A sound and light entertainment venue would be an extremely inappropriate use of this extraordinary park for so many reasons. This city has something special and unique in this park and it serves so many in so many different ways. Please consider! Let this park remain the incredible jewel it is for the city of Huntington Beach! Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Tonya Fannon Prom: r{eaIw Pasoan-Fyn To: Sob oot e ,d agenda Deb: Malloy,re Wary 17,2W5 2:le:16 PM Yaadan' gerensa'i a mm.I re hvtha rra Note that has a homeowner and taxpayer in Huntington Beach.I do not approve of the sign that has been considered for the library.I also am absolutely opposed to the light show in Central Park.Why can't it be on the beach.The light show will impact not only the viability of the landscaping in Central Park.It will impact the neighborhood around it with parking and challenges for traffic.It could be moved to the beach and have a very easy access and would benefit downtown businesses. Annilise M. Flanagan-Frankl, M.A. CounselingPsychologist Nationally Certified School Psychologist Remember-the past is over, the future is a mystery,and today is a gift. That is why it is called the PRESENT. Make today count. Call: 847-226-3119 From: chris macdonald To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.org Subject: Item 24 on Huntington Beach City Council Agenda Date: Monday,February 17,2025 2:49:26 PM 1,14,,,yoi;ddn't often get email f©rn Justtisted yahoexcoMPLearn why thrs .important Dear Huntington Beach City Council and City Staff, I'm asking that you vote no on Item 24. We do not need that in Central Park. As a near resident to it and a member of The Tree Society, I like to see open space year round. From, Chris MacDonald (Huntington Beach Native resident/voter/business person) From: vanessaweb(thaol.com To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Council Meeting Date: Monday,February 17,2025 3:19:16 PM Dear Members of City Council, Three comments..... It seems that council members are ready to sell out our Central Park to recoup money they have wasted. I'm with Steve Engel that this would only disrupt our flora and fauna including mating bald eagles. It doesn't seem feasible to repair our park after the shows. Parking seems to be a big issue as well. The plaque honoring the anniversary of our beautiful library and the dedicated people who have worked/work there should not be a bizarre,unattractive partisan effort to keep your names in the public eye. Remember that your job is non partisan. The two petition library items must be put on the ballot for our citizens to vote on. The petitions have been verified and now our citizens deserve a chance to have their voice heard. Thank you,Vanessa and Jeff Webster 40 year residents Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS From: Cecily Gates To: suoolementalcomm4surfcity-hb.orq Subject No light show! Date: Monday,February 17,2025 4:04:51 PM [You don't often get email from cecilygates@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification No light show in Central Park. 1. Not enough parking for added visitors. 2.Wildlife. 3.Possible nesting bald eagles.I remember watching a juvenile during Covid so they have been around that often. Not to mention the owls,ospreys hawks etc. and monarchs. 4.What reason will this serve?I assume 100%of the proceeds are not benefiting HB.So for what a little extra sales tax? Please Visit the park on a regular basis and then let me know what you'd do. Please NO lights show. Thank you Cecily Gates Homeowner in HB Sent from my iPhone From: Laura Kleofer To: suuolementalcommCalsurfdty-hb.org Subject: Opposed symphony of flowers in Huntington Central Park Date: Monday,February 17,2025 4:30:58 PM Yau dcsn t aiten�c e4;15rom laurato le�afer@grna�l corn e�rr�why 1hi� c Importan ' I would like the city council to oppose The symphony of flowers at Huntington Central Park East. I do not see how it will not adversely affect resident and migrating birds that use the pacific flyway. In fact, it will adversely affect the beauty, wildlife and peace of being in the park. Thank you, Laura Klepfer From: Karen Talbot To: sunolementalcomm 5C)surfcity-hb.orq Subject FLOWERS OF THE SKY,Item 25-017 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 4:39:23 PM you don`t often get ema�i from karent16�6@gcnai c�r<s Learn why than t�important.a Dear City Council Members, Once again,I am writing in opposition to the proposed license agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment,LLC,for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers show in our beautiful Central Park. I've been a resident in Huntington Beach for over 35 years. One of our city's greatest assets is our lovely Central Park and all of it's related services and activities. When family and friends visit me,they are always impressed with the"great outdoor" natural space we can enjoy as part of our daily lives,which includes amazing wildlife year round. Residents of Huntington Beach enjoy this treasure because it offers the kind of environment we all need when we are not working. Whether it's watching the butterflies,listening to birds,or just enjoying the serenity of a long uninterrupted pathway winding around the park,Central Park is perfect. It's ALL natural! Once again,as this agenda item has reappeared after being removed from the City Council Meeting agenda in December(at the last minute--no doubt to all of the pushback on this issue which was rushed and non-transparent), HB residents are not being listened to by our city council members. In the environmental impact report(Attachment#2"Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report), I keep seeing the word"temporary"over and over again, as if this word"temporary"was to make it seem like all the issues that residents would be concerned about are"no big deal". The Symphony of Flowers show is an ongoing event for at least half of the year! This doesn't even..compare to other city events such as surf competitions or the airshow. It IS a big deal to have a crew with equipment come into the middle of our park for weeks before the show,and weeks after the show, EACH YEAR,to set up and take down the production. All of that activity would adversely affect the"natural"enjoyment of the park for those two months EACH YEAR,for the next 3 years,with the option to add more years on after that. And please don't think that all of the extra nighttime activity during the 5 or 6 months of shows would go unnoticed. The fenced off area of the show would be right in the middle of the park for all of those months. That is significant—not temporary at all. A production that affects our park and surrounding area for 6-8 months out of the year,should never be referred to as"temporary". This is NOT something I would like to see occur in our park of"natural" beauty. Nothing"natural"about bleachers,cardboard trash cans, concessions,thousands of LED lights, portable bathrooms,etc. The show needs to find another, more suitable location. The show does not need to become an eyesore in our great natural space here in Huntington Beach. Please do the right thing and vote NO on this item Sincerely, Karen Talbot From: adrienne low To: suoolementalcomm(a)surfcity-hb.orq Subject Oppose rental of Central Park and Library Plaque Date: Monday,February 17,2025 4:55:23 PM I am writing to oppose any proposal to rent out Central Park to Flowers in the Sky Entertainment and to oppose the library plaque. I am a 30 year resident of Huntington Beach,who regularly enjoys the green space provided at Central Park.The park is a treasure for the city.Renting out the park for large scale events will disrupt the natural habitat of many animals that live in the park.Noise, increased human activity, and temporary structures and lights will lead to habitat destruction and force wildlife to relocate. These disruptions would have long lasting effects on the park's ecosystem. In addition, I am opposed to the ridiculous plaque that has been proposed for the library.Not only is it a waste of money, but it is highly political and divisive. Sincerely, Adrienne Low From: Missy Coffman To: suoolementalcomm4surfcity-hb.orq Subject Symphony of Flowers-Opposed Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:01:28 PM [You don't often get email from missyanncoffman@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiort]. Dear City Council Members, As a citizen of Huntington Beach I'm sending this email to urge the City Council to vote NO on the Symphony of Flowers project. Besides the negative ecological impact this project will have on our beautiful Central Park,the exhibit will take away from,not add to or improve,the natural beauty of the park.Why install anything that will draw our gaze away from the natural surroundings. I'm keeping my correspondence short and simple,but I know I am one citizen out of MANY who oppose this project. Please represent the citizens of Huntington Beach and do NOT continue with plans for the Symphony of Flowers. Frequent HB Central Park Visitor, Missy Ann Coffman missyanncoffman@gmail.com From: Cheryl Ekstedt To: suoolementalcomm(@surfcity-hb.orq Subject: NO ON SIGN FOR LIBRARY AND THE ELECTRIC LIGHT SHOW Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:14:23 PM [You don't often get email from cekstedt@verizon.net.Learn why this is important at bttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] As a tax paying resident of Huntington Beach,I am totally AGAINST The sign for the Central Library and The Laser Electric Show in Central Park....NATURE,ANIMALS,QUIET, From: Mary LeBoeuf To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)suoolementalcomm(a)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: ' "Flower"show Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:14:46 PM [Some people who received this message don't often get email from leboeuf53mary@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification I No!!! This is a dreadful idea. The parking nightmare,the disruption to the landscape and wildlife,the serenity of the park, we have a natural flower show there every day already. Please listen to your constituents. This idea is Madness,Antagonistic,Greedy and Abhorrent! Mary LeBoeuf Sent from my iPhone From: N Meyers To: suoolementalcommCa�surfcity-hb.orq Subject City Council meeting 2/18/25 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:16:59 PM • I urge you to oppose agenda item#20,the plaque for the Huntington Beach library's 50th anniversary.This is a divisive and blatantly political plaque that does not honor the library.Ilf the City Council wants to honor the library, it should support its work instead of interfering with professional librarians and threatening to outsource the library's management. Please select option C in agenda items#22 and 23 to show actual support for the Huntington Beach library. I also urge you to vote against agenda item#24 regarding a light show in Central Park.The proposed light show would cause multiple harms to the environment,degrading the habitat for birds and other creatures.The negative impacts would far outweigh any financial or other supposed benefits. Thank you, Hildy Meyers Huntington Beach resident From: GIGI KAN To: 5uoolementalcommCalsurfaty-hb.orq Subject: petitioning against HB Light show Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:19:45 PM You don't often get ernad from:77,:g,kanqs-ylcgloballnt,frarn why this rs Important: A light show?! ! Plants and trees will be effected without their normal watering, especially without watering during the summer months of the year. Why not beautiful our existing gardens and landscape with a version similar to the light exhibit Descanso Gardens in La Canada Flintridge, CA has. A revenue stream that brings in thousands from November to January months, from people all over, and does not kill any existing landscape. Appreciate your listening ears, G. Kan From: Gloria Knioht To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject Proposed signs Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:26:20 PM IYe71-r-ram i 7'777(5 a" a". - 1c ✓n 7ou dan t ofteFT get en ai fror,gior7ajkdtght@yahoo cord Learn vwhy thrs rs wmportant I am against the Maga sign at the library and against the light show proposed for Central Park. Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer From: SUSAN MORABITO To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject No light show please or change location Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:49:33 PM [You don't often get email from smorabito@aol.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiort] Please change the location of the light show to either the senior center or beach,anywhere but the park! I love wildlife!I love birds.Keep our wildlife safe.Or better yet,forget the life show.Thank yip,Susan Morabito Sent from my iPad From: To: CITY COUNCIL(INCI,CM0 STAFF Cc: supolementalcomm aC)surfcity-hb.orq Subject Symphony of Flowers Vote-Request to table Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:54:05 PM YQu d ntroften get email from gabnela imenendea Ex yahoo corn !Pain why this is important Dear City Council Members, I am writing to express my significant concerns regarding the proposed location for the upcoming vote for the Symphony of Flowers event,and its impact on our park.While I acknowledge the efforts invested in the environmental study,I respectfully disagree with several of its conclusions and believe the chosen venue presents considerable challenges to preserve it. My understanding is that similar events held at the beach have demonstrated success,suggesting that alternative locations may be more suitable and pose less environmental risk. Therefore,.I strongly urge you to reconsider the current proposal and explore the viability of relocating the event to a our city beach or another appropriate alternative. I understand a vote is scheduled for tomorrow's meeting,and I sincerely hope you will carefully weigh the points raised here before casting your vote.I believe a change of location would better serve the event's objectives and minimize potential negative impacts. Respectfully, Gabriela Menendez. • From: Elizabeth SanFiliopo To: CITY COUNCIL QNCL.CMO STAFF;suoolementalcommesurfdty-hb.orq Subject: Symphony of Flowers—Oppose Date: Monday,February 17,2025 5:55:16 PM Dear City Council, We are long term residents of Huntington Beach and are opposed to the proposed Symphony of Flowers in Central Park. We walk almost daily in Central Park. We love Central Park and appreciate the diversity of wildlife in our park.Not only are the grounds at risk by this proposed event but also the wildlife including endangered birds are at risk. If the City wants to have the Symphony of Flowers in our community,then a different venue should be selected. Elizabeth San Filippo From: Amo Yahoo To: suoolementalcommc surfcity-hb.orq Subject Symphony of flowers project Date: Monday,February 17,2025 6:39:49 PM [You don't often get email from arline@razouk.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.mss/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiou] City Council of Huntington Beach, I am NOT in favor of this project in Central Park east.The trees,bushes,grasses,wildflowers&wildlife,let alone we lovers of nature and HB residents would be detrimentally impacted.A few thousand dollars for the city does not seem worth it. Please consider another location in an undeveloped area of the city. arline pohlman From: Tracy Luth To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Fw:NO on the Central Park light show Date: Monday,February 17,2025 6:57:58 PM Sent from the all new AOI.app for iOS Begin forwarded message: On Friday,February 14,2025, 12:09 PM,Tracy Luth<p.luth@verizon.net>wrote: Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS Begin forwarded message: On Friday,February 14,2025, 8:32 AM,Tracy Luth<p.luth@verizon.net>wrote: I am writing again to express my disagreement with your plans to put a light show and fences in Central Park. You have been informed several times that putting up fences and shutting off the water for essentially 3 years will damage and kill most of the trees, flowers and shrubs in the area. Volunteers along with city employees (I assume)have spent ten years restoring this area. So much for"we will protect our parks" on your campaign signs.There are plenty of beach and commercial parking lots that a light show can be set up on. Again, such a disappointing city council....elections will come around again and I for one will remember. Tracy Luth Sent from the all new AO,app for iOS From: Nancy Garafalo To: suoplementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Subject 25-107 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 7:22:47 PM I do not believe that Huntington Beach Central Park is a good location for the Symphony of flowers.Volunteers have spent so much time beautifying the area for Huntington Beach residents to walk and enjoy the park.Having metal bleachers and plastic flowers will just not be the same. Nancy Garafalo Huntington Beach Resident Sent from my iPhone From: Buf le Channel To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF'suoolementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: CC Meeting Feb 18,2025-Oppose Agenda Items 20&24 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 7:38:27 PM To City Council Members: Congratulations on your continued embarrassing political middle-school level stunts like the hideous library plaque that was clearly designed by Gracey,Luke and Valentina. It's ugly, juvenile and trashy. I have no doubt you'll vote for it because you are itching to get MAGA on the wall of the library. It's a juvenile design and an obvious lame attempt to put your names on a commemoration for the library that you had no hand in creating, improving, or protecting. It IS the perfect symbol of your hypocrisy though, so kudos for preserving your special "Sellout7" legacy. If you do decide to defy all of the speakers and letters from the public (whom you clearly detest hearing from), I'd go with design#2,just to solidify your historical mark as the worst City Council in Huntington Beach history, and to ensure laughs from residents for years to come. To clarify,I oppose agenda item 20 and this stolen heroism plaque with either of these two hideous designs and the names of the City Council members on the plaque, names of people that have done nothing but attack and try to destroy our beloved library. I vehemently oppose the Symphony of Flowers light show and agenda item 24. This is another short-sighted idea brought to us by Tony and his corporate cronies. Selling out our public parks is just a slap in the face to the residents who have paid for those parks to be maintained and restored and should remain for PUBLIC USE ONLY. Yet once again,the Sellout7 wants to destroy the things that mean the most to the citizens of our city. Find your revenue somewhere else.Don't sell our open space to the highest bidder. Weren't you all about "NO HIGH DENSITY,PRESERVE OUR OPEN SPACES, WE CARE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT"??HaHaHa. What a joke. If you were actually good at attracting business,you should actually,um, attract business with long-term benefits that don't exploit our natural parks and open spaces that we hold dear. Do you ACTUALLY believe that we will sell out several shows a night for months and months? Where will everyone park?2000 people several times a night?Really?Will the nearby residents suffer massive increased traffic and parking nightmares in their neighborhoods by attendees trying to avoid the parking fees? How will you build, manage and maintain a 180x50 foot water basin?Will it be a drowning hazard for kids?Will it be a mosquito haven? Will the walkways near the event site be closed to the public?That is not right. How will you protect the migrating birds?The Bald Eagle pair?The owls?All of the other birds and wildlife? You won't. Your$50.000 budget to manage repairs and damage to the area won't bring back the wildlife that will escape the chaos that this show will bring. Your "report" is useless because you don't know the TRUE impact this will have on the park and the wildlife. And....why the rush?Is the owner of the show promising Tony campaign donations?Tick tock. We can smell the corruption and back room deal a mile away. Library Petitions- stop trying to create some kind of doubt in the legitimacy of the petitions. Obey the law and either adopt the resolutions for both petitions or put them on the next election ballot. Stop with your weird breach of confidentiality survey emails and phone calls attempting to smear the petitioners -and acting like the citizens are stupid and didn't know what they were signing. Obey the law. Considering the budget shortfalls and failing infrastructure problems,the continued problems with downtown, and the need for long-term business,and tourism attraction issues,perhaps you should focus on solving these problems and enhancing the lives of the citizens by ensuring our beautiful parks are for PUBLIC USE ONLY and our Central LIbrary receives the dignified celebration it deserves, instead of playing petty political games. Sincerely, B. Channel 36 year resident,homeowner and voter From: Cheryl To: suoolementalcomm4surfclty-hb.orq Subject: Pls oppose the"Symphony of Flowers"program Date: Monday,February 17,2025 7:41:47 PM You c onFt often get email ftorrr Cheryl 2O18 a�9ma�i com .I earn why thrs�s i p©rtah I'm opposed to the"Symphony of Flowers"program slated to take place in Central Park East. Siting the program there will damage the trees, shrubs,plants and grass in the park. If this program is crucial to the City,then relocate it to a location where it won't cause harm to the environment. Cheryl Johnson cheq1j2018@gnail.com From: Diane Pavesic To: suoolementalcomm( surfcity-hb.orq Subject Library Plaque and Light Show Date: Monday,February 17,2025 7:47:29 PM [You don't often get email from dianepavesic@cs.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] Huntington Beach City Council, Please do not further divide our City by displaying the proposed plague which does nothing to honor our esteemed library. Please do not move forward with the proposed light show which will ruin our beloved park. Please fix the problems in the City that you were elected to remedy.Please do not continue to make Huntington Beach the city of prejudice,exclusion and hate we are now known for. I no longer admit where I live as this city has become an embarrassment.I do not wish to be associated with the ideals you stand for. Diane Pavesic 35 Year Resident of Huntington Beach Sent from my iPad 1 From: Tim Channel To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF);suoolementalcomm(@surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Agenda Items for 02182025 Council Meeting Date: Monday,February 17,2025 8:02:08 PM Hello, I urge the council to consider the below comments: Item#20 (25-102) - STRONGLY AGAINST. The library is for all residents and should never be politicized. Just because you control the council does not mean that the council owns the library. The obvious MAGA reference is inappropriate for a public non-partisan institution in the public square. Item#22 (25-087) -To use your own words "THE VOTERS HAVE SPOKEN" . Let the people vote. The signatures were approved by the OC Registrar of Voters. This item needs to be immediately approved or put on the ballot as soon as possible for the VOTERS TO DECIDE. Item#23 (25-126) - Congratulations if your intent was to destroy the careers of our city's experienced and dedicated library personnel for some anti-woke political victory. Some have left for greener pastures because it was obvious to them that you do not even support your own employees. To use your own words "THE VOTERS HAVE SPOKEN" . Let the people vote. The signatures were approved by the OC Registrar of Voters.This item needs to be immediately approved or put on the ballot as soon as possible for the VOTERS TO DECIDE. Item#24 (25-017) - STRONGLY AGAINST. Huntington Beach Central Park belongs to the citizens of this fair city. The enactment of this proposal would deny access to residents to parts of the park for extended periods of time.How is this good for us? Thank you for your consideration, Tim Channel Huntington Beach From: Family Ryan To: suoolementalcommf)surfcity-hb.orq Cc: Celeste Ryan Subject: Symphony of Flowers Agenda Item#24—City Council Meeting 2-18-25 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 8:44:27 PM You don't often gettemail froip c3rnryan@gmad'corn'1 eamy wh thrS is important Attention--Mayor Burns, Mayor Pro-Tem McKeon and Huntington Beach City Council Members Kennedy, Strickland, Twining,Van Der Mark, and Williams I am emailing to express my opposition to entering into an agreement and sponsorship of a Symphony Of Flowers Event(s). I have reviewed materials provided and researched other such events. Huntington Beach Central Park is an inappropriate space/location. This event would not only be disruptive to surrounding businesses, residents, and community services and to visitors but to the wild-life that the park serves as their home. The damage of even a one year agreement would result in irreversible damage to the wild-life, landscape, residents, local businesses, and visitors. I understand the city is faced with economic challenges and the council is exploring revenue producing options. After careful review of information provided and researched,this option will cost more than it will benefit. Keep exploring other options and vote "no" on the Symphony of Flowers agreement. Thank you for your attention-- Celeste Ryan 54 year resident of Huntington Beach 39 year Huntington Beach property owner From: Kim Hendricks To: supplementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.org Subject: City Council Meeting Agenda item 25-017 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 8:48:22 PM Yau dc: t eftenpget einai(frorn kwri en en-tic cern earn why t,,.. rs important 41-; 2 ,... It-0,..,14-:,,-,;_,.%;. ... .0 . ,00 .„,„%, ..T. .. , -- --.• • 2 ,..„ . . .,,. ;,,,. . r. P''.-"'°'; : d , �' p,� '` 4 c Es �r` '''''•$ 4.?-4..,....A ..1.4.. , arit .:- ..t,',..!' ; '-'- 4-.. . .-...,...., . 74: ; '.'„'''.iit ik, tii7;, ,.....f' °:,... , 2 *a...,..' ,. 1 .;',----",„.+1 i. . 1‘•-*,,.1'. '--' ', ..-, , 'a-,,,,40-70T:...„. .\,, .. ••,..V ",z.t. .../ - „,„,- ,, ' 2.-',..:2.- N.'i .... , :4•—* l''', -71: ro , — e i '' j ' ° ' ;4„;',A.*TN,' ': '."1 * I,......,. -. . Cy a,r, . ^ «¢' °.- ^ ,xx°R Please distribute the picture and comments to City Council members and include''in the minutes. My name is Kim Hendricks and I am letting you know that there is new information which affects the environmental impact report. Recently there has been a highly endangered species named the Ridgeway Rail in HB Central Park within the site determined in this lease agreement and therefore this agreement with Flower of the Sky Entertainment should not be approved till further investigation has been done. Artificial light does negatively impact ecosystems and the wildlife within them. I refer you to the book of studies compiled by Catherine Rich and Travis Longcore entitled, `Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting' published by Island Press. This new information should cause you all to pause and follow CEQA properly. Btw-the majority in the community have repeatedly said that a light show in our park at night does not serve us,the residents, and we don't want it. Thank you, Kim Hendricks From: Frances Swolgaard To: suoolementalcomm( surfcity-hb.orq Subject: NO LIGHT SHOW IN OUR PARK! Date: Monday,February 17,2025 8:49:04 PM [You don't often get email from fswolgaard@yahoo.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] I urge the Huntington Beach City Council to: Cancel the proposed light display in Huntington Beach Central Park. Conduct a full environmental impact study before making decisions that could harm local wildlife: Consider alternative locations that do not interfere with delicate ecosystems. Prioritize eco-friendly initiatives that align with Huntington Beach's values of nature conservation and sustainability. Concerned, Frances Swolgaard Sent from my iPhone From: 310oeoniesCa)gmail.com To: suoplementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject Cancel the proposed light display in Huntington Beach Central Park Date: Monday,February 17,2025 9:46:06 PM [You don't often get email from 31Opeonies@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] We urge the Huntington Beach City Council to: Cancel the proposed light display in Huntington Beach Central Park. Conduct a full environmental impact study before making decisions that could harm local wildlife. Consider alternative locations that do not interfere with delicate ecosystems. Prioritize eco-friendly initiatives that align with Huntington Beach's values of nature conservation and sustainability. Consider being a Registered Dark City so we can reduce light pollution and see the beautiful starry skies.Any other city can put on a light display.Be different.Be considerate of the habit and of your constituents that dedicate their free time to restoring and maintaining our beautiful Huntington Beach Central Park. Sincerely, Gabrielle Villalba From: Juana Mueller To: suoolementalcomm nsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Symphony of Flowers Date: Monday,February 17,2025 10:31:41 PM [You don't often get email from juanamuel1er33@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] This light show is absolutely inappropriate for our beloved,green,open,natural,full of birds,bees,butterflies,and is one of a kind park in the County in which countless citizens find healing and peace to the human spirit.PLEASE DO NOT approve this use!!! Thank you. Respectfully, Juana Mueller Sent from my iPhone From: EEJF McKirachan To: suD➢IementalcommCaisurfcity-hb.orq;CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF Subject Re:Central Park Light Show Date: Monday,February 17,2025 10:39:04 PM Somepeople who receivedthismessagedon`toften,getemail from bfmckirachanC gmail'co I earn why this is impo tart Please forward as City.Council@surfcity-hb.org was denied. Dear Council-members; Please let nature rest at night in Central Park. The American Eagles have been seen and are protected. Other even nocturnal animals like possums that have historical paths that run through the proposed space that you might think is empty,would be disturbed by even a temporary Light Show, let alone a 3 year project. Will you all not eat the nights of the show? If you are interested in,a light show, can you use an already available space like stadiums, or even parking lots with trees? Why not private space like Sherman's Gardens, the convention center, or other private land lands that already have permits to make money. Consider contacting schools and solar companies to try to make a deal to see if they want covered solar panels in half the lot and a light show in the other half, once down the power goes to the city or space. I have seen light shows at outside venues like Disneyland and Epcot, and indoors at a Planetarium and Anaheim Convention Center. What's available at he HB convention area? i think there are too many let's throw the idea out there just to see if it flies. The idea that it's only 2%of the park is "remote" and not"used" is missing the point of appropriate location. Maybe not by paying public, but by nature that uses every square inch of this earth. Using logic making money from unused space would say this city hall as a perfect location. Using promotional materials to sell this idea to nature lovers is disrespectful and indicates you can't listen. Please avoid natural spots for plastic flowers and a lights that are only humans can enjoy and at a price many can't afford. Why wouldn't Boeing or other private land owners not offer up space for this show? Not even sure how HB city lawyers approved this one. Didn't we learn liability issues from the air show fiascos, oil spills and other"unavoidable"natural events? Walk at your own risk clause when you pay buy a ticket. Making public"nature" space, private for a"spectacular" and money making for a private "company" is just wrong! Even sharing profits with the city is dubious at best. I have been to Circus de Soliel at Irvine Spectrum. A place with the space,parking and designated space for one of these event. Can Pacific City/convention center figure out a route and a way to make this happen? Maybe the cleaned up ASCON dump site would be a perfect site for a cleared space with parking in the city leased from Magnolia Tank farm! I think the coyotes and squirrels have already been relocated. Please don't waste any more money on using the park unless you plan on compensating your person natural space for public use. Please keep the parks natural. Thank you for your time and consideration! Elizabeth Eagleton McKirachan HB home owner References: PS Reference to Light Show Description: The show, which would be staged in the northeastern portion of Central Park East, features more than 100,000 luminous flowers and more than 500,000 low-emitting LED lights, choreographed to classical music. It starts with the audience in bleacher seating, before the ticket-holders are allowed to walk among the flowers. https://m.youtube.com/@symphoniedesfleurs9806 On Mon,Feb 17,2025 at 9:39 PM EEJF McKirachan<bfmckirachan@gmail.cotn>wrote: Dear Council-members; Please let nature rest at night in Central Park. The American Eagles have been seen and are protected. Other even nocturnal animals like possums that have historical paths that run through the proposed space that you might think is empty,would be disturbed by even a temporary Light Show, let alone a 3 year project. Will you all not eat the nights of the show? If you are interested in a light show, can you use an already available space like stadiums, or even parking lots with trees? Why not private space like Sherman's Gardens,the convention center, or other private land lands that already have permits to make money. Consider contacting schools and solar companies to try to make a deal to see if they want covered solar panels in half the lot and a light show in the other half, once down the power goes to the city or space. I have seen light shows at outside venues like Disneyland and Epcot, and indoors at a Planetarium and Anaheim Convention Center. What's available at he HB convention area? i think there are too many let's throw the idea out there just to see if it flies. The idea that it's only 2%of the park is"remote" and not"used" is missing the point of appropriate location. Maybe not by paying public, but by nature that uses every square inch of this earth. Using logic making money from unused space would say this city hall as a perfect location. Using promotional materials to sell this idea to nature lovers is disrespectful and indicates you can't listen. Please avoid natural spots for plastic flowers and a lights that are only humans can enjoy and at a price many can't afford. Why wouldn't Boeing or other private land owners not offer up space for this show? Not even sure how FIB city lawyers approved this one. Didn't we learn liability issues from the air show fiascos, oil spills and other"unavoidable"natural events?Walk at your own risk clause when you pay buy a ticket. Making public "nature" space,private for a"spectacular" and money making for a private "company" is just wrong! Even sharing profits with the city is dubious at best. I have been to Circus de Soliel at Irvine Spectrum. A place with the space,parking and designated space for one of these event. Can Pacific City/convention center figure out a route and a way to make this happen? Maybe the cleaned up ASCON dump site would be a perfect site for a cleared space with parking in the city leased from Magnolia Tank farm! I think the coyotes and squirrels have already been relocated. • Please don't waste any more money on using the park unless you plan on compensating your person natural space for public use. Please keep the parks natural. Thank you for your time and consideration! Elizabeth Eagleton McKirachan FIB home owner References: PS Reference to Light Show Description: The show, which would be staged in the northeastern portion of Central Park East, features more than 100,000 luminous flowers and more than 500,000 low-emitting LED lights, choreographed to classical music. It starts with the audience in bleacher seating, before the ticket-holders are allowed to walk among the flowers. https://m.youtube.com/@symphoniedesfleurs9806 From: Amanda Furche5 To: suyolementalcomm(a)surfcity-hb.orq Subject city council meeting Date: Monday,February 17,2025 11:00:34 PM Please vote no. on the light show Despite what seems to have come back from the environmental impact report....There is no way it will have no effect. There are nearly zero completely dark places in our urban environment and our parks are the only places left that even come close. birds look to the stars to navigate. Light pollution disrupts animals circadian rhythms, breeding, navigation..etc BLeachers are down right HIDEOUS. Any quaintness appeal of the light show is immediately killed by bleachers. Any light show I've been to in Europe,people just sit on blankets and bring their own chairs and picnic. Elderly people can't easily climb up bleachers nor can people with disabilities. The proposed 150,000/year is a joke. People are not going to go to this more than lx. Also, vote no on the maga sign. The MAGA sign is a blatant political power move and CORRUPT waste of our taxpayer money when we are in a deficit. Absolutely not. You will be voted out with such obvious corruption like this. Amanda Herring Huntington Beach City Council Meeting comments on Agenda for 2/18/2025 Mayor and City Councilmembers: APPROVE: Item 19—We recommend you approve of the City of HB proceeding with the Staff recommendation on Actions A and B,though we're puzzled that this represents accepting funding from CalPFA,a political subdivision of the State of California,via bonds,to subsidize HD housing,albeit for Seniors.Wondering how the CC(specifically McKeon) rationalizes that with HB suing the State over mandating precisely what this seems to be. Item 22—'Selection and Use of Library Materials'-We recommend you approve of the City of HB proceeding with the Staff recommendation on Actions A and B,or C.We don't approve of proceeding with Part D,as that would cost the City too much to pay for a Special Election when it could be held at a fraction of the cost in the scheduled 2026 General Election. Item 23—'Public Operation of Library Services'-We recommend you approve of the City of HB proceeding with the Staff recommendation on Actions A and B,or C.We don't approve of proceeding with Part D,as that would cost the City too much to pay for a Special Election when it could be held at a fraction of the cost in the scheduled 2026 General Election. DENY: Item 20—Deny or postpone the approval of the'Design of the Plaque Celebrating the Huntington Beach Public Library's 50th Anniversary as Recommended by the Community&Library Services Commission'. Under no circumstances should the design of this plaque reflect the letters MAGA in any configuration or composition that groups the letters together,or are emphasized in any other way.It is very clearly a biased political acronym that is universally recognized throughout the USA. It does not belong on this,or any other plaque,placed at any property considered to be Public or City property. Item 24—Deny or postpone the execution of a License Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC,for the management and operation of Symphony of Flowers at Huntington Central Park East,as well as the Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report(FMEIR)for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park,City of Huntington Beach, California,until one or more public forums can be scheduled by the City Council,Symphony of Flowers 'authorized'representatives and other City Officials to garner wider public comments and questions. At this juncture in time,there are still far too many questions and issues needing better definition and explanation to enter into any legal Agreement between parties.As the tentative date proposed to commence the opening of the shows isn't until September of 2025,we have adequate time to allow for one or more public forums to occur to more thoroughly address residents'concerns. Sincerely, Larry and Susan Slonim (714)357-9600 From: Pat Goodman To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL,CMO STAFF);suaolementalcommesurfcity-hb.Qrq Subject: Vote No on Agenda Item#24 Date: Monday,February 17,2025 11:53:08 PM Please vote No on Agenda Item # 24 License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC, for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers at Huntington Central Park East located at 18381 Goldenwest Street There remains several unanswered questions about this action which leads me to believe that this activity requires a vote of the people per city code section 612 (Measure C). Does the square footage of this activity and cost exceed the limits of Measure C? In the spirit of full disclosure please tell us what other sites were considered for this activity, why they are not listed, why they were rejected from consideration, and who from the community were part of the decision making? Thank you, Pat Goodman Huntington Beach, CA From: dean Peterson To: suoolementalcommesurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Central Park Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 1:09:25 AM [You don't often get email from jpetersonl@socal.rr.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.m§/LearnAboutSenderldentification] February 17,2025 To all City Council members, I,and many residents,strongly oppose this light show venture.This eight-month-a-year show will have a severe impact on the park grass,trees,plants,and wildlife.We have Bald eagles and owls that live in the park.Migratory bird patterns,including those of Canada geese,will be impacted.If you don't really care about our Central Park wildlife,know that it will have a very negative impact on the residents of the city that enjoy the park every single day.Whether it be walking,bird watching,photography,picnics,or playing a quick game of soccer-all will be impacted in a negative way.We pay taxes for the upkeep and use of our public parks.None of the park should be closed to the residents of the City of Huntington Beach. How and why did this light show even come about?Not only will this show impact our wildlife and resident enjoyment of the park,it will bring crowds to further damage our failing infrastructure.Crime,whether it be alcohol or drug related;or burglaries from vehicles,or robberies,always follows crowds,and a negative impact due to these issues will further impact the surrounding neighborhoods in a very negative way. I have heard there is to be a$50,000 restoration fund.Who is providing that money?I hope not the residents'tax payer dollars.Is this fund frozen at that level?Is it a three year fund,or a fund that will be implemented every year for the destruction of our park?$50,000 sounds like quite a bit of money,which it is.It is a mere drop in the bucket, however,for damages that will most certainly occur due to people driving into Huntington Beach for this light show at our beautiful public park.Who is providing security for this show?Who is paying for the security?Why haven't any of these details been made available to the public?Where is the"transparency?"You needn't even try to answer that question. This is a bad idea for that location.If you want a drone show,there must be a better place.Perhaps the big empty lot located on Magnolia close to the beach,the Ascon Landfill site.38 acres of emptiness.That is a perfect place,due to its size.There will certainly be less of a negative impact on the aforementioned issues.Personally,I and many other people think show shouldn't even be considered. Sent by Pj Symphony of Flowers Safety Concerns for People and Wildlife BIRD CONCERNS: This is one of the top bird sites in Southern California 1. The pond that they are erecting; is it going to be dangerous for birds and other wildlife to drink out of and swim in? Chemicals and such... 2. Also the report called out bird habitat on all sides of the fenced in area, when they did their EIR. They failed to mention that the area they want to enclose is bird habitat. How are they going to ensure it remains habitat when the trees and other flora and fauna die because of the contrary use to a public w u Bird Habitat'(soutit pfSits); :Bi o kiabttai; 514 Bird Habitat(sctnh.of;Site Bia.Habit t S3s0, ICe:tinkwlthta B rd Habitat.(south of Site) Bi4.Mabitat' 1 Otmiccr p blii Bird Habitat(south`o,Site) Bic Hai itat: 57 2' (preseritatiein Bird Habitat(sout#l•of Site) Blo Habit 6p 1 Notes,wor t Butterfly Habitat(east ofSitee) Bib,Ftabitat: S3 tx; Biitf4i1VkabitattOitiiftitat Big Habitat 55.2 Butte:fty Habitat(east of Site) >;Blo Hai itat 6 7 Butte fly Ha itat(east ofSite);: 'B1c Habitat; 58. SG4 Library, Ufaraait; 3 Residence(north of Site) :iiesidettit al, 42 ResidencetttorthbtSite) Residential,. .2: . Residence'(northeast)'orgite) Residenttak: 4;3 9 • Notes:; Recelver.lrlcations were plaeedat the,edge ofthee relevant propertieaclosestto the RrojectSite 3. The HB City website, touts Huntington Central Park as a top birding site. BUT WOULD COMPROMISE THE BIRDS HEALTH AND SAFETY FOR $$$ Fun Facts • Rated the.top;location for birding by various magazines and Huntington.Beach's bird community 4. Why isn't this a measure C item? I have spent 20 years volunteering in the park. Measure C always came up when the smallest structures were proposed. The latest being the Secret Garden arch. 4 years is not temporary. 4 weeks maybe. 5. This area is named the Alvin M. Coen Campground. How can the council justify taking away this historical area's use? Hundreds of scout campouts through the years, including the city's own yearly campouts? Also, this area is used for the two, war reenactment camp outs and other year round uses. It will be a dust bowl after the 6 month long event. '4mewavwF "w;mamr+ . 3 & 1y, Zt1,"" . rrnstroe ram" Garden Centrs. F a m Via-AngeltnaDr Y Vista DelSollDr ,§ �a V.a CCarona4Dr s t l q� f w Foose Design 0 Alvin M Coen Directions" �" save i Campground in Huntington Beach,:California Located in'Huntington Beach Central Park East Address:PX4X+9H,.Huntington;Beach,CA:92647 6. The park's 50 year old infrastructure has many delayed maintenance issues. These issues are safety related. Inviting more people into a park with so many liability issues seems like an expensive gamble. Also, Council never mentioned that the money the city made from the event would go to improving any of these safety needs: The old paths with uneven areas and steep drop offs on some of the path edges. P tr '' `� ="``.t .fit. af.: � ; y - ' � -*� x .a e--..... -.... . '...4r;'''''>0'1-k*''' '11tVi 'g.,lb ---' 7,•'.:a'ar '''r`M.T..; --\,,,,,,,,, ilr,':-ff,I %Z.T7,";4M':417&71-›*4:5 ;;;; *41S-.4 ..ie." 144' ro d 7. Poor lighting for pathways throughout the park.Is the 'not temporary' light event going to be serving alcohol? Is the city prepared when attendees fall off poorly lit paths with steep drop offs and roll down the hill into the lake? Some areas have no lighting at all. 8. The old irrigation that is constantly breaking down. The landscape maintenance contractor has to pay for all irrigation repair supplies. What is the incentive for them to repair expensive irrigation failures on an old irrigation system? These breaks sometimes cause pooling and muddying of areas in the park which could cause slipping (especially on the hill leading down to park from the main lot). 9. The city's delayed maintenance of the park's aging trees means there are continuing tree failures. Falling limbs, falling trees. Recently, three eucalyptus trees fell on the Wooden Amphitheater. Luckily no one was sitting there at the time. .� f;za d_ k ,,d :q �: `ram oe 3 r i ` ". "x ag4:70?0- _ 10. Squirrel holes. A CLS city staff member broke her leg when she fell into a squirrel hole walking from the park to the main parking lot near the library. Someone recently fell into a hole on the west side. See their _ google HCP review about that and the restrooms as well. » 'fir °` oY(f) •t \i r.,t pv i-fi 8 t+. N yS ,`"'� ,cr.„ ^cc t ax ..i. yam, '; t•:„ -. : ` ^ k '*' ,, of . 7 f";7 , ,r.,,L ;P;) , Blanca Villegas Ortiz. . Local Guide•163 revie rs- 45;photos `' * amorith:ago: I have been;to this park quite a few"times given thecross.countiy league meets are heldatthis park.While this is a really nice;park.with>beautiful viewaand::an awesome playground I can.'t seento understand Why on.eaith you would rent out the park for; events that hosts:over 12 high school in OC and yet have:2 bathrooms available!That part has 6 bathrooms totaland only 2.bathrooms were owl and:there was,hardly any paper the bathrooms!Also,.what''s Withal(the holes in:thegrass We had.one of our runners_sprained their ankle do tothe grass growing over a hole The.field has#roles all; over.It's:such:a beautiful park,but if you're;going to rent out the field for:events,then al[6-bathrooms should be:opened,:in working conditions,and:stocked with toilet paper And please check the field forthose big holes! 11. Ebikers are using the park as their own jumping and racing course. They start at the library lot and race down park hill to jump over the main path. They race through the whole park at all hours. Weekends are the worst. They are inconsiderate of people and dogs on the paths. Someone will be hurt or killed someday. The city still hasn't addressed this ongoing issue. Education isn't working. They need to put in physical deterrents, especially at the jump area (where most people will access the venue from the main parking lot). ,- ., i , 12. Will the irrigation in the venue area be turned off? There is a large round garden that will be fenced in for the event. That garden was created by an eagle scout. How is that garden going to be watered and maintained if it is fenced off from irrigation and maintenance? There are two new groves of trees that will also be fenced in. Who will water and maintain them? Will the venue operator replace the trees with larger trees if they die? The community funded that effort to put them in! How long will it take for the park to look like it did after the venue breakdown? Will the mature trees and plants and grass even survive? Will the install for the next year's event come, before the park can recuperate? Will the Landscape Maintenance Dept. have to spread grass seed and deep water trees that haven't gotten the proper irrigation? Will they have to fence off the area to give the lawn time to regenerate? Park visitors may not be able to access that part of the park for the next 3 years. 13. Not enough trash cans throughout the park now. The city only picks up the trash in the park M-F. So on weekends the trash overflows (around the few cans that are there) and migrates throughout the park. Will there be extra cans added for all the extra people that will be using the park? And how often will they be emptied? Fix E.yuwnt3 e^ as .. " w 1,4 ^$ .nb 6 3•'tt^• t W w • Na . 14. Are the park hours going to be increased to midnight to allow for this event? Are they going to keep the park's east side restrooms open to accommodate the many more people in the park at night? Will people be defecating and peeing in the park if the park restrooms are closed? And if they are to remain open longer, who is going to be tasked with supplying the toilet paper and cleaning them at midnight? Many people can not access the park restrooms now, because some people hang out/sleep in them for hours. With longer hours, comes more people overnighting in the park. 15. Graffiti and vandalism is a given. Who is going to clean off the venue's fence when it is tagged. Will the city have to pay for the removal of increased homeless trash and graffiti due to the increased sequester that the venue fence will provide? :"p • P �3 �� .. ♦. X% q/ ?e C , { K ill 4. Ac i - ' $4.' y p ,/ . - '.... ,, -,...' , '' 1 t,r . ' .1,, ' i itilk * , . *, X 16. Vehicles are in park/library parking lots all day, til the park closes. These owners use the park's parking lots as their home address. They cook, set up furniture and congregate there. They bathe and wash their clothes in the restroom sinks. They leave trash and return the next day. Shipley parking lot has many break-ins and the police have recently put in surveillance cameras. The break-ins still continue.- w 'Argil:" r � s.. *FA za a �x1t'' y g " +. - , .. ,.,:,,,. gay, a , 4f7 -.r P L .. 4 4 , l 1, , � e • 4 'axe r + �, I _4, a a _ 1` r ';� r �1r" at.r 41. l4, t a....ei . `.,,.'.t` : X ' l d r ' , 17. Scary Island is at the south edge of the light show. There are usually encampments there. When PW cut down tree overgrowth, they left all the cut limbs and logs in big piles. They said it was for bird habitat. But instead, it is perfect for building structures and cooking fires. The people in the bleachers will be able to see the fire glow from those campfires. This video was taken back in June 2024: https://photos.app.goo.gl/jQvaCegfjxj4zfjv7 18. They will also see from the bleachers, all the trash in the water, which flows into the park from Gothard (see attachment). It is never removed. •\, F.'Sa4°'ey -1,; 'w. u gym„ `p .+ _ f;-1 -' ' < ,te x ,�:;t` .J r.. f, ti* ..3..- 1-3 C,�^a,--fie° .�,„ . - � \ �, °�"'y� ,vmvA :y �}.'p.J `S .w4t 'i .'Sqj" „�. , ' ? i ro i r^ °�- q N. ' -ttUa t4..:', ..X n'i - $.. ,"Q� '", aa.^'. ,,, , '. Zvi^#` ice - ",:-7;1i , 5*-,,,i0.„, ,,,,._.. - ,,'4''''it44i5- tr .."'''"-;;,-_4"•?,''. L''''':A";::!:, --.:',:f"2::!' 19. Supplies for light show. Won't there be a lot of deliveries made for replenishing food and souvenir items?Also custodial deliveries and the people who will be cleaning the venue. That means there will be a lot of extra vehicles on the paths to accommodate these deliveries and services to this event. Most of that activity will take place in the daylight, I assume. Isn't that going to affect people who are there to enjoy a walk in a peaceful park (not dodge traffic)? 20. How are emergency services going to access the park when there is an emergency? People will be coming and going from all areas of the park to attend and leave this event. Right now, I don't believe either fire or police have proper knowledge of all the areas of the east side of the park (nor do the visitors, who need to tell them their location). It could be a lot of driving around park paths, looking for the emergency. 21. The event operator wants to connect to the old sewer system for its porta potties. Won't those thousands of extra visitors put a strain on an old system that is probably at capacity now? If that system fails it could be an ecological disaster for the park. I've seen toilet paper and other stuff overflowing from the Slater restroom sewer system into the area next to the park playground. 22. If you approve the show (or at least 4 of you will), is the CS Commission going to change the parks master plan and designate the whole east side for high intensity? Presently that area is designated passive/low intensity (I think). Over 3000 people are parking in park lots daily and accessing this area by foot (or by tram service for disabled people). There will be the added delivery trucks and emergency vehicles. The east side would go from being a park to being a fairgrounds: The park hours would have to change from 5am-10pm to 5am-12am. That additional 2 hours means a lot of more homeless issues could take hold. 23. At the park's 50 year Anniversary, a lot of council and staff touted the park as the 'gem' of the city. It is a gem because of its unobstructed open green space with beautiful flora, fauna, water and wildlife. Much of the east side is taken up by the lake, ponds and channels. It is also a gem because of the countless years the community and city spent restoring it. To the wildlife, the park is their home. Safety issue for the wildlife: There are a lot of wildlife that come out at night in the park. Coyote, skunk, raccoon, rats, owls etc. How are they going to keep the wildlife from drinking and accessing the water in that reflecting pool that the show operator will be erecting (it probably has chemicals)? How will you keep the wild animals from interacting with so many people walking in the park late into the night? When you add "fencing, lights, amplified sound, bleachers, man made pool, vendor stations (food and souvenirs) and thousands of people" for months, you aren't describing Huntington Central Park anymore. Huntington Central Fairgrounds the gem of the city! U I'll IGTON CENTRAL PARK , ,,,,,--- ----\\ ,,, .„...,.-.,.. 4,..,,,,-......._,....._. ,..,. CELEBRATING 50 YEARS 113 JU61LEE1)/ Thank you to all the individuals,organizations,and partners,who have donated their time and resources over the past 50 years to help make Huntington Central Park the gem that it is'today. Dedicated June 15, 1974 Rededicated:June 15,2024 CITY COUNCiL ° Gracey Van Der Mark,Mayor 't. ,.- Pat Bums,Mayor Pro Tent .1 Rhonda Bolton Dan Kalmick Casey McKeon Natalie Moser Tony Strickland >I 2*, __CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE En Parra,Interim City Manager Travis Hopkins.Assistant City Manager e- Wk. COMMUNITY S.LIBRARY SER icss commis rem •lqt,' Austin Etisati,Chair 1.44i, Lutiy Mcliardy.Vice Chair creason Baker Lisa-Lars.Barnes Laura Costume Or Rictiird 14'r iii 7- • - .itSwill. , .. . " ...l r4rOn an cc M NI Y a, BRARY SERVilkEE P.RaWCIJ_EANI <StS , Ashley Wysocki,Danctor rii 4 Chits Cola PaciIikes a Dave Manager, Erie Barra zn 14,1aexel,nu 8.Technology Superv.ser .-.• 0,2 1 Charlene Garnet,Sr Narraustrattve armerlant filT.4 .. Thank you Shari Engel sengelhb@yahoo.com 657-203-1627 From: Jan W To: suoolementalcomm()surfcity-hb.orq Subject: HCP light show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 4:46:29 AM Yau don t o ten get�rrra�C rom;jd�4�ntetest©gmajl co n i warn why thrs Es important I reject the idea of a light show in Huntington Central Park. I'm a very active park visitor and regularly visit the broad open spaces for birding, exercise and spiritual connection. The proposed location is one a few remaining open, grassy spaces. We need that open space. The hundreds of species of breeding and seasonally migrating birds that make HCP their home need the open space and unaltered tree access that will be critically diminished by this disruptive venture. Aka: I completely reject the idea of having the light show of any type or structures involved in Huntington, Central Park or any other park in Huntington Beach. We are trying to put money before everything and that is wrong to do. Cordially, Jan Pehoviack 7282 Yellowtail Dr.,Unit 103 Huntington Beach, California jdi4interest@gmail.com 562-453/8456 Sent from my iPhone From: Pehoviack Richard To: suoolementalcommesurfcity-hb.orq Subject HCP light show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 4:49:04 AM Yac dont often ge>-0 �i from brvin7E grnaii corn l err whythls is rr srtant I reject the idea of a light show in Huntington Central Park. I'm a very active park visitor and regularly visit the broad open spaces for birding, exercise and spiritual connection. The proposed location is one a few remaining open, grassy spaces. We need that open space. The hundreds of species of breeding and seasonally migrating birds that make HCP their home need the open space and unaltered tree access that will be critically diminished by this disruptive venture. Aka: I completely reject the idea of having the light show of any type or structures involved in Huntington, Central Park or any other park in Huntington Beach. We are trying to put money before everything and that is wrong to do. Cordially, Richard Pehoviack 7282 Yellowtail Dr.,Unit 103 Huntington Beach, California twobruins@socal.rr.com 714 317 - 7644 Sent from my iPhone From: Kathleen Deemer To: suoolementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 6:29:32 AM Nou clon.t.often get email from deerxserkdd@gmail corn earn why this is important ti I respectfully ask you to reconsider entering into a contract for the light show via Symphony of Flowers. Please do not proceed with this event at our Central Park I urge you to help keep Central Park a refuge and calm public space for our community. I understand that you believe the monetary aspect will benefit the city ,however having this light show will disrupt our community in negative ways . I want the park to remain as it is , a place where our community members can rest, and recharge as parks should be . A public park is not the place for an event of this magnitude and will negatively affect our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Kathleen Deemer From: johnkinohbOverizon.net To: suoolementalcomm a()surfcity-hb.orq Subject re Strong feelings against the Synphony of Flowers attn:HB City council Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 6:59:15 AM ;: rYQu don t often get errta:I from johnkrn9 no!- cenl cxc1 nit l Porn wfi}rttri i spcsrtan Dear City Council Members, I have lived in Huntington Beach for 34 years, and want to express my serious concerns about the potential impact of the "Symphony of Flowers" event on the ecological health of Huntington Central Park East. Based on our extensive knowledge and experience, gained through years of collaboration with City park employees, we believe this event poses significant risks to the park's valuable trees, shrubs, plants, and grass. Specifically, I am concerned about the following: <!--[if !supportLists]-->. <!--[endif]-->Irrigation Disruption: <!--[if !supportLists]-->o <!--[endif]-->The event will necessitate the shut- off of the irrigation system for several days prior to setup and throughout its 8 month duration. <!--[if !supportLists]-->o <!--[endif]-->This prolonged dry period, coupled with our region's arid climate, will severely stress the park's vegetation and the grass and all trees will die <!--[if !supportLists]-->. <!--[endif]-->Potential for Irrigation System Damage: <!--[if !supportLists]-->o <!--[endif]-->The age and potential fragility of the underground irrigation lines raise concerns about leaks and bursts upon system reactivation, similar to the issues encountered with the Central Library fountain pipes. <!--[if !supportLists]-->. <!--[endif]-->Impact of Heavy Equipment: <!--[if !supportLists]-->o <!--[endif]-->The use of heavy equipment for event setup and teardown will inevitably cause significant stress and potential damage to the park's delicate root systems. <!--[if !supportLists]-->. <!--[.ndif]-->Long-Term Sustainability: <!--[if !supportLists]-->o <!--[endif]-->Given the anticipated eight-month duration of each "Symphony of Flowers" session, the cumulative impact on the park's vegetation could be severe, potentially leading to significant tree mortality and long-term ecological damage. Huntington Central Park is a vital asset to our city, providing invaluable ecosystem services and enhancing the quality of life for our residents. I believe it is crucial to prioritize the protection of this valuable green space. Therefore, I urge the City Council to reconsider the current location for the "Symphony of Flowers" event and explore alternative venues that will minimize the ecological impact on our treasured parks. Sincerely, John John King johnkinghb@verizon.net From: Judy Morris To: suoolementalcommasurfcity-hb.orq Cc: CITY COUNCIL,(INCL.CMO STAFF) • Subject Fwd:Items 20-Library Plaque&24-Flowers of the Sky Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:23:36 AM Good morning, I did not notice that my e-mail below was included in the supplemental communication for either item noted above.Please make it part of the record for both items. Thank you, Judy Morris 31 year resident of FIB Begin forwarded message: From: Judy Morris <judyannmorris@yahoo.com> Subject: Items 20-Library Plaque & 24-Flowers of the Sky Date: February 15, 2025 at 7:25:05 AM PST To: SupplementalComm@surfcity-hb.org Item 20-Library Plaque Public libraries should be apolitical.Names of City Council members and politically appointed Library Services Commission members do not belong on this plaque. The MAGA acronym and"in God We Trust"are not appropriate to include on a plaque that purports to commemorate 50 years of public library services, by any stretch of the imagination. The current city council has not been supportive of HBPL. They have been openly critical of educated,highly experienced librarians' choices regarding the childrens' book collection by alleging that there was pornographic material in the children's library, but have yet to identify any such material. One council member has gone so far as to publicly insinuate that a former council member was a pedophile because he stated he would not hesitate to read a book the current council member referred to as a"pedophile's dream"to his own child. City Council's recent e-mails to residents requesting feedback about their"petition signing experience" appear to be an attempt to block a legal,democratic grass roots effort to simply keep the treasured HBPL as it currently exists. Why not request community input in advance, or have a contest for residents to submit their ideas to showcase the library rather than creating a promotional tool for the current City Council and Library Commission members?This was a missed opportunity for the City Council to attempt to unite rather than continuing to divide the community. There is no doubt the library is, and has always been a wonderful place for children.Apparently the folks whose names are listed on the plaque aren't aware that adults are also welcome to utilize and enjoy the library. This plaque is an abomination rather than a commemoration. Item 24-Flowers of the Sky I believe the 6-8 month length of time that this project will occupy space within Central Park, and the resulting foot and automobile traffic would be excessive activity for our beautiful park and surrounding areas. Maximum projections of 900 visitors and 300 vehicles per show at 4 shows per night will likely create many traffic log jams in the surrounding areas and a great deal of foot traffic within the park. This project will undermine the natural habitat and peaceful nature of the park that residents of Huntington Beach deserve. Please do not approve the project. Judy Morris 31 year resident of Huntington Beach From: Levin.Shannon To: 5uoulementalcommAsurfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:57:23 AM Original Message From:Mary Wall<wwa112@yahoo.com> Sent:Friday,February 14,2025 3:31 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Light Show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from wwall2@yahoo.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] It only has taken me 83 years to realize Politicians cannot be trusted.Please do not put that light show in our park. The Wildlife will be impacted...the trees and plants will be destroyed.We will remember who the City Council listened to! Thank you for your attention Mary E.Wall Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:This city councils legacy-descruction//VOTE NO on SOF in Central Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:57:37 AM Original Message From:Jolene Wicks<jolene_wicks@wycliffe.org> Sent:Friday,February 14,2025 4:24 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:This city council's legacy-descruction//VOTE NO on SOF in Central Park [Some people who received this message don't often get email from jolene_wicks@wycliffe.org.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentiflcation] Please keep in mind as you vote on 2/18 about the Symphony of Flowers(SOF),what you want to leave behind as a city council.I know that you are thinking about$$$and budgets,but you also need to think about other locations. All over our beautiful city are parks that are named for past Mayors and benches in HB Central Park named for past City Council members.It is a legacy that they wanted to leave something lasting for future generations. As a resident who uses the park many,many times during the week,please do not approve an event that entertains people for a moment to make money while destroying beauty and access for your residents. We DO NOT want this show in our park. —Jolene Wicks From: Sarah Fish To: supolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject LISTEN TO YOUR RESIDENTS Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:57:40 AM You don t often get email from sarah kai]estad@o gmai coin l earn why this is Important �...w _�a- ;tv; . . The ugly plaque is an absolute disgrace and slap on the face of the library and those that supported the library. I do not support the funds that could otherwise go to maintenance of the library to pay for that joke of a plaque. The light show is a terrible and disgusting idea that will do nothing but destroy our park and create all kinds of problems in that area. Sarah Fish LONG TIME FIB RESIDENT From: i.evin.Shannon To: supplementalcommCa�surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:Council meeting items Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:57:48 AM Original Message From:Pamela Evasic<evasic3@icloud.com> Sent:Friday,February 14,2025 4:26 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Council meeting items [Some people who received this message don't often get email from evasic3@icloud.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] I think the commemorative plaque at the library is unnecessary and only causes more division in our city. The light show is going to be a complete disaster.We do not need the attention,traffic or mess.Please leave the park alone. I have been a HB resident since 1969.Please find more ways to stop more high density housing in our city. Btw,I voted for all you people.Please do the right thing. From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommesurfcity-hb.orq • Subject: FW: Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:58:32 AM From: Marie Cheever<mariecheever@yahoo.com> Sent:Saturday, February 15, 2025 2:21 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show 1 . Some people who received this message don't often get email from mariecheeverC@yahoo.corn.l earn why thins important This email is to voice my concerns about the projected Light Show. I am totally against adding that-venue to our beautiful coastal city-we do not need that type of event here in HB. Please reconsider the impact this event would have on traffic, neighbors, crime, destruction to our park, upset to the wildlife-just to name a few reasons I encourage you to JUST SAY NO! • Marie Cheever From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm aAsurfdty-hb.orq Subject FIN:Symphony of Flowers,plaque Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:58:34 AM From: Lisa Burford<Iburf1407@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, February 15, 2025 2:33 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Re:Symphony of Flowers, plaque Some people who received this message don't often get email from Iburf1407C@gmail.com.Learn why this important I have lived in Huntington Beach for most of my 68 years. Central Park is enjoyed by so many people who wish to walk and commune with nature. The light show that is being . considered seems extremely commercial, and not a pleasant addition to our wonderful park lands. My concerns are: noise( music being played over loud speakers), lights, traffic,trampling of the park itself which has been in the process of being upgraded with many trees and landscaping. Why not take this opportunity down to the beach front near Beach Blvd where there are already commercial entities? That might alleviate the destruction of our wild habitat for the park environment. On another note,the MAGA inclusion on the library plaque... I love our city council's of the past,they did assign their names to many plaques which is a show of their work towards those goals. The current plaque is NOT representative of the population of Huntington Beach. I am discouraged by this lack of foresight. Sincerely, Lisa Burford, Huntington Beach,92647 • From: Levin.Shannon To: suoplementalcomm(aa surfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Flower show event Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:58:43 AM From:Janice Hopkins<janice.hopkins@verizon.net> Sent:Saturday, February 15, 2025 4:48 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Flower show event 1 . Some people who received this message don't often get email from janice.hopkins @verizon.net.learn why this is important I have been a.huge.supporter.of our city council but I believe you are on the wrong side of the issue with this event, Please do not allow this event to destroy the delicate balance _ of bird life in our beloved park.The political damage will be too great. Move it to someplace else or drop it. Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS From: Levin.Shannon To: sunnlementalcommCa surfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Central Park luminary Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:58:49 AM From: Drosaforever<drosaforever@aol.com> Sent:Saturday, February 15, 2025 5:27 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Central Park luminary Some people who received this message don't often get email from drosaforeverC�aoLcom. Learn why this is important To: All City Council members Please do not approve the Illuminati symphony of flowers. Our community does not want it in this beautiful natural setting. Please do what you said you would do when you were running for city council. You said you were representing our community. I know the majority of our community does not want this. So please do not approve this! Thankyou Debby Rosa Sent from the all new AOL apo for iOS From: Levin.Shannon To: suyulementalcommialsurfcity-hb.orq Subject - RN:Symphony of Flowers-Please vote No. Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:59:00 AM From: Roger Sabanegh <roger@sabanegh.com> Sent:Saturday, February 15, 2025 7:06 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers-Please vote No. Some people who received this message don't often get email from roger(asabanegh,com. Learn why this is important ' City Council members, We respectfully request that you vote"No"on the Symphony of Flowers at HB Central Park. . We have read the EIRA,the supporting documents, and the Q&A Facebook responses by Chad Williams. Thank you for the informative feedback and for researching revenue options. Please vote "No" and consider another location for Symphony of Flowers. The nature and wildlife in the HB Central Park have a magical and therapeutic effect that provides healthy(biophilia) relief from the stresses of life. The digital flowers and LED lights show ruin the peaceful effect of the real nature. Please consider that we already have a big problem with DUI drunk driving on Goldenwest,Slater and Beach Blvd. Selling alcohol at the park then unleashing the drunk drivers at night, 30 minutes later after the show,will result in more intersection fatalities. Thank you for the considerations. Note 1: My family voted for the magnificent 7. Note 2:We are HB residents for 30 years. Best regards, Roger Sabanegh From: bettina eastman To: bettina eastman Cc: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF);suoolementalcommCa)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Item#24 25-017 City Coundl Meeting 2/18/25 Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:59:33 AM Some people who received this message dorm often get email frram bettmae24@gma� cam I ern why this is 3 jf' 2 J important z February 17, 2025 Huntington Beach City Council city.council@surfcity-hb.org S upp lementalComm @surfc ity-hb.org Comments: Proposed Symphony of Flowers License Agreement Dear Councilmembers, As a wildlife biologist, concerned citizen and long-term resident of Huntington Beach, I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed Symphony of Flowers License Agreement for Huntington Central Park. Yet, I have strong concerns and feel that the documentation is insufficient and is inadequate as it pertains to this project. In fact, in many cases the study data listed for sensitive species and other environmental impacts is lacking. There is no discussion or investigation of the ecological relationship between the existing Raptor and bird populations and usage of habitat areas within the project footprint. There have been no nesting bird surveys conducted within the proposed areas of change. So, any mention of a less than significant impact on resident birds is simply hypothetical.As an example, of a well-known resident bird,the Great Horned Owls have been nesting within Huntington Central Park, specifically on the East side, for over a decade. Great Horned Owls would be affected by this proposed project.Because not only would the project area negatively impact their ability to forage at night, but it would also pose a potential risk of injury from the temporary fencing and bleachers.Furthermore, foraging ability by diurnal raptors such as White-tailed Kites,Red-shouldered Hawks and Coopers Hawks,to name a few also have the potential to be harmed by these unfamiliar fences. In addition to the diminished capacity to forage at night the additional lights and large numbers of people in the area where there historically have been few will certainly have negative consequences.Diurnal birds would also be prevented or disturbed from night roosting which is extremely important to their health and survival. And, for sensitive species.the statement in the Addendum to the final EIR for Master Plan which States"Due to the frequency of birding records for other species within Central Park East,the absence of least Bell's vireo occurrences during peak spring breeding season(e.g., April and May) seems to suggest that least Bell's vireo may have stopped over within the BSA in the past, but did not breed." It is inconclusive as to whether these birds have nested within the project area because focused avian surveys for least Bell's vireo were not conducted.And these birds tend to be quiet when paired and nesting. This project has far more potential for negative impacts than have been explored in the Master Plan revisions and I am strongly opposed to this project!! Sincerely, Bettina Eastman bettinae24@gmail.com Comments sent as email 2/18/25 From: DAVID KUNTZ To: supolementalcomm()surfcity-hb.orq Subject Objection to the development of Central Park for a Luminaire light show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 7:59:46 AM [You don't often get email from dkuntz6401@aol.com.Learn why this is important at kittps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentificatiort] My name is David Kuntz and I live at 6401 Fallingwater Drive in Huntington Beach.I am adamantly opposed to any development of Central Park.it should be painfully clear to anyone with a vision for this city that once you develop park land for any reason you will never get it back and that this precious natural resource will be lost forever.It happened with the Senior Center that ate up the park in a land swap with developers.it happed with the Sports Complex.And it it happens again,it will just be another example of the greed and the incompetent management of our city.I urge everyone on the City Council to vote against measure 24. Thank you David W.Kuntz Sent from my iPad From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Central Park Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:05 AM From:Gerald Donohue<gdonohue41@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2025 12:46 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Central Park Light Show Some people who received this message don't often get email from gdonohue41C@gmail.com. Learn why this Ls important Stands erected for 2,062 spectators, up to 4 shows per night. My math skills may be limited but my spelling skills aren't.TRAFFIC! • From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommesurfaty-hb.orq Subject: FW:The Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:11 AM From:johnbraun99@verizon.net<johnbraun99@verizon.net> Sent:Sunday, February 16,2025 1:00 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:The Symphony of Flowers Some people who received this message don't often get email from johnbraun99verizon.net.Learn why this is important • To all City Council members, I would like to encourage you all to vote against this project! I feel the event will have a negative impact on the park and the neighborhood. I don't think an event that goes on late in the evening should be approved next to a housing tract. It's genuinely unfair for the neighbors to be bothered with the noise, light pollution and increased traffic. I don't . even live there and I know I would be extremely unhappy about this. My grandchildren and children go to bed at 7:00pm or 8:00pm due to the fact they are up at 4:30am or 5:00am for work and school. I do enjoy taking my daily walks in the park. Perhaps you all should take a walk in the park and see what a peaceful and beautiful place it is before you decide to change it. Have you really thought about the negative impact this will have on the park and the surrounding neighbors? Please vote against this event. Susan Braun Sent from the all new AOL aop for iOS From: Sheila Peck To: suoolementalcommasurfcity-hb.orq Subject: agenda item 24:No to the Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:18 AM You don t often get email from essspeck©9rnail corn 1 earn why this is important I am writing to ask the City Council to oppose the agreement for the Symphony of Flowers sound and light show in Central Park East. The park should be a refuge for wildlife and a space for the local community to enjoy nature and outdoor recreation. I am concerned about the impact of such a show on birds and other wildlife, and about the unsightly blight it will create for those of us who wish to use the park during daylight hours for exercise and relaxation. Furthermore, I am concerned about long term,possibly irreversible damage to plants and mature trees from multiple shows stretching over several months and years. Do not destroy our gem of a park for short term revenue.Find another location. Sheila Peck Huntington Beach 92647 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(a)surfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:18 AM From:Janet Bean <janetbeandesigns@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2025 1:27 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show I find it very ironic that the 2 people you chose to give an environmental study come with no adverse effect,yet if I google the effects of light show,there are articles after articles with valid scientific studies that show just the opposite. Light shows are proven to cause a great deal of damage not addressed in this study. The damage is to insects that are needed for pollination,to night prowling wildlife,to all birds nesting and natural habitat, migratory birds,the great American eagles that have been spotted in Central park. There is no way this show will not have a very dangerous and damaging effect on the park, all the living creatures and all the plant life. It is very disturbing that you have not looked at other aspects outside the people who gave you the information of No Adverse Effect. Any person with one ounce of common sense would know that light pollution, sound pollution, 1000's of human interactions would not have any effect on wildlife. This whole plan is so bad and it is very upsetting that it feels like a backdoor done deal. I am hoping someone can follow the money trail, because it is hard to believe that someone is not getting paid off when the community as a whole are against it, a very short sighted study was done to paint a rosy picture and the city council seem hell bent on pushing this thru. Bad choices have bad consequences,you were voted in based on many things, but one was protecting open spaces. Please do not make liars out of yourselves like Tony did with the Shopoff fiasco. Thank you, Janet Bean From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommealsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:City Council Meeting 2/18/25 Comments Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:23 AM From:Chris Varga<christopher.j.varga@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2025 3:01 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:City Council Meeting 2/18/25 Comments Huntington Beach City Council, In regards to the agenda for Huntington Beach City Council Meeting on 2/18/25 I have the following comments : Agenda Item 25-102—NO to the MAGA plaque for the 50th Anniversary of our wonderful central Library.This brazen political statement has no place in our celebrating this milestone. Do we even need to waste money on any plaque? Agenda Items 25-087 and 25-126—In regards to both of these approved and signature validated petitions on the future of the Library I support either approving the petitions as is or put them to the people of Huntington Beach to vote on. There isn't another option. Agenda Item 25-017—NO to the Central Park Light show. What a hokey idea. Just leave the park alone! Sincerely, Chris Varga Huntington Beach From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomma surfcity-hb.org Subject FIN:No on Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:32 AM From: Dan Jamieson<jamiesondan0@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2025 3:51 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: No on Symphony of Flowers Some people who received this message don't often get email from jamiesondanOC@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Feb. 16, 2025 Dear HB Councilmembers: • We oppose the Symphony of Flowers proposal.Please vote NO at the Feb. 18, 2025 council meeting. The proposal overly commercializes more than 6 acres of Central Park for 8 months of the year. The area proposed for the event is sensitive bird and wildlife habitat and very popular with birders. The proposed EIR addendum asserts that the event would not result in any new significant impacts. This conclusion seems faulty. The event would operate more than 100,000 LED lights plus additional lighting along walkways; broadcast sound via arrays of 90 total speakers; erect a 180-foot by 50-foot reflecting pool with lights and a projection screen, built with concrete blocks or barriers; install fencing around the site; include a box office,temporary restrooms; extra waste bins, a concession area, control rooms and bleachers. This is not an appropriate use of our precious park space. Sincerely, Dan Jamieson Roxanne McMillen Huntington Beach From: Levin.Shannon • To: suoolementalcommOsurfcity-hb.org Subject FW:Central Park light&sound show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:41 AM From: Michelle Larsson <misunsetca@hotmail.com> Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2025 4:04 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Central Park light&sound show To all members of the current council, I have voted for each and every one of you based on my presumption that you use common sense behind your decisions. Please don't make me regret my faith in your representation. I generally read at least 85%of Agenda Items for every meeting and don't recall any mention of a Light&Sound show using Central Park,as a location slated for a vote. If the information that I just received TODAY for the first time regarding your being in favor of this proposal is correct, PLEASE USE YOUR COMMON SENSE. Vote against this proposal. It's bad enough that we are barraged every night after 9pm from the Disneyland Fireworks sounds. We all know how far away Disneyland is from PCH. I respectfully would appreciate an update from EACH of you before your vote on Tuesday. Thank you, Michelle LarssonNoter/Homeowner/45+year resident/Republican (562)592-1858 17132 PCH#201 H B 92649 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommAsurfcity-hb.orq Subject FW: Light garden in our park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:51 AM From:Tony Chase<tony@allweprint.com> Sent:Sunday, February 16, 2025 7:02 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light garden in our park Some people who received this message don't often get email from tony(@allweprint.corn.Learn why this is • important Once again you want to sell out our city at a cost to our community, but this time it's our most loved community of birds and what little wildlife remains that will pay the price. I have seen a light garden and our area would be so lame and embarrassing anyway. No one asked for this, no one wants it. Find another place to do it or don't do it at all. Carolyne Chase 92647 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm aC)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:SYMPHONY OF FLOWERS Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:00:56 AM -----Original Message From:Jodi Mudry<jodimudry@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday,February 16,2025 8:03 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:SYMPHONY OF FLOWERS [Some people who received this message don't often get email from jodimudry@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiorl I City Council Members: This email is to let you know that my husband and I are TOTALLY and COMPLETELY against this horrible idea of the SYMPHONY OF FLOWERS! The absolute destruction of our beautiful and beloved Central Park is absolutely abhorrent! PLEASE VOTE THIS AWFUL IDEA DOWN!! Be assured that if you don't you certainly will not ever get our vote for re-election! Jolisa Mudry Sent from my iPad From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject FW: Park lease Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:01:03 AM Original Message From:Erin Spivey<erinisalibrarian@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday,February 16,2025 8:47 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Park lease [Some people who received this message don't often get email from erinisalibrarian@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification] To whom it may concern, I oppose the lease of any portion of Central Park to a profit company for any amount of time.This contract is bad for the city,bad for the park,bad for the library,bad for HB. Sincerely, Erin Spivey Sent from my iphone,please excuse any typos From: Levin,Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(nsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: RN: NO on Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:11:17 AM ----Original Message From:Maria Santopoalo<msantopoalo@hotmail.com> Sent:Sunday,February 16,2025 9:28 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:NO on Symphony of Flowers [Some people who received this message don't often get email from msantopoalo@hotmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentificatiorb] To the elected members of the Huntington Beach city Council, I am writing to express my disapproval of the Symphony of Flowers project you are considering for Huntington Beach.The whole project does not look like a winner for our city,and the projected revenue figures are unrealistic at best.Please vote no,or at least write in an option of carefully studying the pros and cons for a minimum of a year before implementing this plan.I feel certain that with more research,it will come to light that this project will not pay off for Huntington Beach in the manner it has been presented,and will instead pose a lot of additional burden on our city,the residents and our park. While I understand the need to find more revenue and income for our city,this does not seem like a great business idea.Visitors are not going to come and stay overnight in our hotels,there is a chance they may grab dinner while they're here,but that would be about it. We should be looking at opportunities that would make people want to come to Huntington Beach and stay for a while.The sports complex was one great idea for development.We host tournaments and players and their families come to town and stay for an extended period of time,providing revenue to our hotels,restaurants,and shops.We should look at more of these recreational type projects.It might be worth investing in more Pickleball facilities as this is a huge draw being the fastest growing sport in the country.If we have space available,I would recommend building more city owned Pickleball courts on a scale of 12-20 courts where we could hold large tournaments and reap profits from both the tournament fees,parking&concessionaires. We do not need the additional burden on our traffic or our beautiful natural park&it's wildlife this ridiculous Light Show project would bring. I urge you to listen to the residents of the this city-as you were elected to represent us and make Huntington Beach a better place. Signed, Maria Santopoalo Resident of Huntington Beach for 30 years. From: Levin.Shannon To: suaolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW: No on Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:11:36 AM Original Message From:Margaret Sloan<peggysloan@gmail.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 7:18 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:No on Symphony of Flowers The proposed Symphony of Flowers is an irresponsible misuse of public land for corporate profit. If this installation were to be put in place,our beautiful Central Park stands to suffer irreparable environmental damage not to mention the displacement of those of us who enjoy and use this section and all other areas of our park on a daily basis. Finally,it is not lost on the responsible residents of our city that the plan at its basest is meant to line the pockets of Council members'political cronies and is the real driving force here. Please do not allow this destructive project to go forward. Best, Peggy Sloan From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm aOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject FW: Light Show Central Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:13:07 AM ----Original Message From:Kelly Gillis<klgillis07@gmail.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 8:03 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Light Show Central Park [Some people who received this message don't often get email from klgillis07@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at rttps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] I live in Huntington Beach&heard you are voting.on a light.show that would take place in Central Park. Please know that the residence of Huntington Beach oppose this plan. Please reconsider as we believe that the light show will do more harm than good to our neighbors&environment. Thank you, Kelly Gillis Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomft@surfcity-hb.orq Subject: RN: Light show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:13:13 AM From: Dan Garwick<danjag2@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:12 AM . To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light show Some people who received this message don't often get email from danjag2Nmail.com. Learn why this is important Please do not allow the lights how in our beautiful park! Thank you! From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:13:24 AM From:Anja Garwick<anjagarwick@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:14 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Park Some people who received this message don't often get email from BpjagarwickCa�gmail.corn.I earn why this is important Please do not allow the light show in our beautiful park! Thankyou! From: Levin.Shannon To: 5uoolementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Nightly Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:13:26 AM Original Message From:Tim Ryan<janemarie19@gmail.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 8:23 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Nightly Light Show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from janemarie19@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification,] I strongly oppose sacrificing existing green space in HCP for this project....Tim Ryan...34522 Via Verde Dana Point 92624 949-489-9328 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCla surfcity-hb.org . Subject FIN:Light Show in Central Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:13:38 AM From: plucky-podiums6r@icloud.com <plucky-podiums6r@icloud.com>. Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 10:11 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show in Central Park Some people who received this message don't often get email from,plucky-podiums6r((icloud.com.I earn why this is important I am a concerned HB Resident in this area opposed to the Light Show in Central Park. We should not be hosting any event longer than a month regardless of where it is,when it is,or what it is. We should find ways to balance the budget without forcing thousands of tourists on us every day. Find income streams that do not ruin residents quality of life.We already have major problems with traffic,and you are losing out on local year round revenue because residents don't want to deal with tourists. You were elected to fight against having more people forced upon us.That does not just mean building. Thank you for your consideration. From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCasurfcity-hb.orq Subject FW: Proposed Agenda Item-Symphony of Flowers Event Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:14:01 AM From: Mary Gaedig<magaedig@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 10:43 AM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed Agenda Item-Symphony of Flowers Event Some people who received this message don't often get email from magaedig(Nmail.cam.Learn why this is important To the Honorable City Council of Huntington Beach: "Don't it always seem to go That you don't know what you got'til it's gone?" Big Yellow Taxi song lyrics I would like to add my voice to the other residents of Huntington Beach asking you to please vote NO on the Symphony of Flowers Event.. We love our Central Park; and we do not want a long-term event,which will cause disruption to the flora and fauna as well as to the residents who live around Central Park. Thank you. Respectfully, • Mary Ann Gaedig From: Levin.Shannon • To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Three year light show in Central Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:14:06 AM From: nanci carbone<ncarbone7629@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 12:30 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Three year light show in Central Park Some people who received this message don't often get email from pcarbone7629(Nmail.com.Learn why this is important . To whom it may concern: Having this light show come to our Central Park would have so many damaging effects on our wildlife, insects and especially the butterflies. Our family and friends are very distraught over this possibly coming to our city. Giving us one more reason to possibly Leave our city which we would hate to do, but things are not getting any better here. Please do the right thing for preserving our beautiful nature,that is so important important to all. From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm()surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:SYMPHONY OF FLOWERS Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:14:10 AM From:Gary Droeger<gary.droeger@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 12:35 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:SYMPHONY OF FLOWERS Some people who received this message don't often get email from gary.droegerc gmail.com.I Parn why this is important Hoping you rule against.the subject show. We need to keep our central park as passive as possible. Respectfully, Gary L. Droeger From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCla surfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Symphony of Flowers • Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:14:19 AM From: Deirdre B<deirdre.borrego@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 12:37 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers Some people who received this message don't often get email from deirdre.borrego(Nmail.com.Learn why this is important • Hello. I am sending this message to share my opposition to and concerns about the proposed Symphony of Flowers initiative. Based on the information I have reviewed there are significant impacts to our green areas as well as other considerations such as traffic, parking, and overall access to these areas for residents during the months of the event. Both HB and the City Council are certainly getting a lot of national attention these days-please devote the necessary time to our local issues and to really examine the impacts to our parks, our wildlife, and our residents. Surely there is a better option. Thank you, Deirdre Borrego From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommAsurfcity-hb.orq Subject Fw: upcoming election Feb 25 Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:14:24 AM Attachments: image.onq From: Carolee Focht<caroleefocht@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 12:50 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: upcoming election Feb 25 Some people who received this message don't often get email from camleefocht(@gmail.corn.I earn why this is important Please protect your cohort,the Honorable Tony Strickland in the upcoming election by postponing the discussion/decision on the light show in Central Park. This has turned into a major debate and will lose him many HB voters that previously supported him. Your reasoning can be: We now have documentation of a breeding pair of Bald Eagles in Central Park.. Any disturbance of a major nature requires a federal permit and I urge you to table this decision until you have an updated EIR. This requires locating the nest and filing for a permit which, sadly,your EIR company did not disclose to you. Our Bald Eagle(s) protections: Are bald eagles protected in the US? YES https://enviroliteracy.org/a re-bald-eagles-protected-in-the-us/ • Do I need a disturbance permit for my activity around a bald eagle nest?YES Do I need an eagle take permit? I U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service Bald Eagle—Laws That Protect I American Eagle Foundation "Take" includes pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison,wound, kill, capture,trap, collect, molest or disturb (16 U.S.C.668c; 50 CFR 22.3). I am including a recent photo of our local Bald Eagle(s) nesting pair. Sincerely, Carolee Focht, 28 year resident HB Central Park •.• } 1d We love our Eagles ! • Larn-Son Vinh is at HB Central Park. 3d Bald Eagles flying over HB Central Park 00 20 2 comments 11 shares C� 8 Ulm Comment Send From: Levin.Shannon To: 5uoolementalcomm(aa surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Light Show proposed for Central Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:14:26 AM From: Laura Boyer<laura2boyer@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 1:13 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show proposed for Central Park Some people who received this message don't often get email from Iaura2boyerCc�gmail.com.l earn why this iS important Dear Council Members, I am in opposition to the light show being held in Central Park. I absolutely believe that it will significantly affect the birds and other wildlife there. They say that 20 minutes in Nature is healthy and good for us. We have this amazing park and the light show will take away from the benefits of being in this green space! I believe it will be a blight to see the fencing for 6-8 months out of a year. We were there on Saturday and you can see the proposed area from many spots along the park trail. There are owls, hawks, and all kinds of wildlife. I believe the wildlife will leave the noise and light of the park and we will see more animals at risk of being run over or hurt in the nearby streets. Please find someplace more appropriate for an event like this! Regards, Laura Boyer From: Levin.Shannon To: suoplementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: RN:Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:17:54 AM. ----Original Message From:Lennie Sheri<lennie.sheri@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 1:49 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers [Some people who received this message don't often get email from lennie.sheri@yahoo.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification Dear City Council Members, We strongly urge you to vote"no"on Symphony of Flowers in Central Park. Thank you in advance for voting"no". Sincerely,Len&Sheri Gallego Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm aasurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Council agenda 2/18/2025,multiple items Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:17:59 AM From:Julie Bixby<julie@bixby.org> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 2:00 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Council agenda 2/18/2025, multiple items Some people who received this message don't often get email from julieCa bixby.org.I earn why this is important To Council persons of all genders, faiths and creeds: RE: Item 25-102 - Proposed Library Anniversary Plaque The City Council is blatantly using a City resource for its own political gain. The font size of the front-and-center MAGA acrostic is so much larger than that of"Huntington Beach Central Library", and there's so much star- spangled fluff around it, that the plaque looks like it's recognizing 50 years of MAGA, a well-known political movement, rather than the City's Library. Further adding to the plaque's political message, it displays the individual names and offices of the loud and proud MAGA elected officials. The City's Code of Ethics - you did read it, didn't you? - says "I do not use my office or the resources of the City for personal or political gain." Plastering a political logo/acronym with your name and office on a City resource sounds very much like using a City resource.for political gain, which violates the Code of Ethics. RE: Items 25-087 & 25-126 pertaining to placing the Citizens Initiatives on the ballot Deputy City Manager Jennifer Carey, who prepared these two RCAs, gets creative - to put it politely - with the fiscal impact of placing the citizen initiatives on the General Election ballot. She writes for both 25-087 & 25- 126: "The next General Election would be November 3, 2026. Should the City Council elect to submit for this date, the cost would range from $340,515 to $399,499. If the City Council decides to include the second citizen initiative... an additional cost of approximately $8,500 would be incurred for both scenarios." This makes it sound like the cost of including a single initiative on a GE ballot is an astounding six figures, yet somehow tacking on a second initiative adds a mere $8,500. This is a false narrative. Less than a year ago, the text of a similar RCA, 24-465, which was co-written by Carey, read simple and clear: "The estimated additional cost to place one Charter amendment measure on the November 5, 2024 General Election ballot is $10,000, bringing the total estimated cost for the November 5, 2024 General Municipal Election to $310,000. (emphasis added) ' Funds to cover this amount are budgeted in FY 2024/25 Election Account No. 10010201.69505." How in the world did the cost of adding one item to a GE ballot go from $10,000 to $300,000+ in less than a year? It didn't, although the phrasing of the current RCAs implies that it did, thereby misleading the public (and possibly the Council) that adding just one ballot initiative would be an enormous expenditure it can't afford. Moreover, RCAs 25-087 & 25-126 don't mention that funds are always provided in the City's budget to cover basic General Election costs, expanding the false narrative that the City can't afford to put the (supposedly costly) citizen initiatives on a GE ballot. Had the current RCAs been written in the same clear verbiage as the prior 24-465, this false impression wouldn't exist. The City Council needs to stop playing games and stop fabricating excuses (including the "were you lied to" survey) to avoid placing the lawfully submitted citizen initiatives on the 2026 General Election ballot. RE: Item 25-017 — Flowers of the Sky License Agreement I'm disturbed by the City's selling out of its parkland to try to make a quick buck. The ends don't justify the means. I'm also particularly dismayed by the vendor's obligation of "Shall provide a complimentary hospitality package that includes 400 complimentary VIP hospitality passes for the event per year for use by City's employees and representatives." 400 VIP passes per year? It seems a rather excessive number of freebies being doled out. It also begs the question of how, exactly, these hundreds of yearly freebies serve "a legitimate public purpose of the City... consistent with state law"per Resolution No. 2013-23. (emphasis added) Requiring the distribution of 400 VIP passes sounds awfully like bribery to me, a "pay to play" scheme (aka, we'll let you hold your event if you give us a bucket load of free passes to attend it). The City doesn't need to be so greedy. Cutting the number of passes in half to 200 (or cutting even fewer to 100), you still have a generous allotment for whatever "legitimate public purpose" premise you come up with. Julie Bixby Huntington Beach From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Symphony of Lights Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:18:12 AM From: Elaine Parker<epmmrpl@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 2:35 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Lights Some people who received this message don't often get email from ppmmrplgmail.com.Learn why this is important CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS We urge you to reconsider"Symphony of Lights"for Central Park. This planned event of a "light show" is definitely not a good fit for our wonderful Central Park which should remain an open green space. There are several negative aspects of this venture: * noise pollution to adjacent neighborhoods, *light pollution to neighborhoods and, of course,to our natural wildlife that inhabit our park. Nothing good can come from an artificial light show with music in a park. * Parking Where do people park? *The show does not end until 10:30, it makes no sense since the park closes at 10. This venture will definitely disrupt the wildlife population and their habitats with artificial light and noise. The lights alone could cause disruption in flight patterns of birds that . migrate at night. As you know, our Central Park has numerous habitats for a diverse number of bird and animal species both who are here year round and some that migrate. The lights and noise will definitely interfere with their habitat and could possibly harm their natural behavior and the worst being that we may lose some of our wonderful population. As you are aware,we now have sightings of bald eagles and if they decide to nest in Central Park,their nest and surrounding area must be protected. Again,we urge the council to reconsider the"Symphony of Lights" until, at least, a full environmental impact study is done. Overall this is a no-win for the park, its inhabitants and definitely for the people of Huntington Beach Sincerely, Bill and Elaine Parker From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm dd surfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Concerned Citizen&Neighbor Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:18:17 AM From:Shelly Bigger<shelly@shellybigger.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 2:36 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Concerned Citizen & Neighbor Some people who received this message don't often get email from shellyCa�shellyhigger.com. Learn why thick important Members of Council- I'm voicing my concerns on several topics the council will take up on tomorrow's meeting. Library Plaque- HB as a city that endeavors to include all its citizens should never show partisanship on city buildings or plaques. The plaque is to commemorate 50 years for the LIBRARY and the library only. The acronym created by the four words chosen below is a thinly vailed attempt to push an agenda from one side of the political spectrum. To what end is unclear but it feels childish and mislead. Magical,Alluring,Galvanizing,Adventurous This list of words also has no literary significance-it was not written by a known celebrated author nor lyrics from a universally love song. The acronym clearing spells out MAGA which perhaps is some of your beliefs and you have the right to believe as you will. HOWEVER, if it doesn't represent the diversity of political beliefs of ALL its constituents. It should be replaced with wording to better address the Libraries 50th Anniversary. I highly recommend you re-consider and honor the 50th anniversary of our wonderful library and its deep meaning to all people as a place for learning. Keep, 'learning and all the possibilities that brings', as the topic for the plaque removing all political references. It's really the only way to honor the Library's history correctly. A quick google search will yield multiple worthy quotes like the ones below... "The doors of this Library are open now and are all welcome. The judgment of history is left to you,the people. I have no fears of that,for we have done our best. And so I say, come and learn from it." Ronald Regan "The only thing you absolutely need to know the location of the library" Albert Einstein The more that you read,the more things you will know.The more that you learn,the more places you'll go."—Dr. Seuss Symphony of Flowers. I love Central park-it's a beautiful area for humans and wildlife to enjoy quietly, It's a haven for many birds, animals and humans alike. Not to mention the most important fact that the park is on the Pacific Flyway a vital route for migratory birds. Remove this item from the Consent Calendar-the public demands transparency from the council in reviewing the proposal before approval and possible put on the ballot. NOTHING should be done w/o a environmental impact study Until the above 2 items are addressed to the betterment of all HB citizens...DO NOT approve the Symphony of Flowers to operate an 8 months long show 4 night a week with 2K possible attendees This will not only disturb the natural rhythm the park enjoys to the both wildlife and surrounding neighborhoods. No amount of money is worth jeopardizing this haven-the added pressure on the park and accompanying trash and misconduct of participants is NOT what we need now or ever. Search your common sense and realize the company that wants to this to happen doesn't give a damn about Central Park-it needs our lovely green background to make their show look good.Ask them if they placed this in this parking lot of the Westminster Mall, would they have the same effect? I doubt it. Don't let them USE us this way. Thank you for your open minds while considering these topics. Shelly Bigger HB Resident From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommesurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:The light show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:04 AM Original Message From:Ana Sears<anasearsl@icloud.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 3:35 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:The light show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from anasearsl@icloud.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification Please reconsider this venue. No matter what the environmental report says I feel there will be ongoing damage to our wildlife.Especially for the planed long duration of this entertainment venue.Please vote against this and or find another alternative venue to this plan such as the equestrian site and Goldenwest/Ellis. Surely Cirque de solie creator can create lights within a circus tent. !! Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Library Plaque and Light Show-Vote No Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:12 AM From: Brian Reilly<breillyhb@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 3:40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Library Plaque and Light Show-Vote No Some people who received this message don't often get email from breillyhbagmaiLcom.Learn why this is important As a city resident I am strongly requesting that you vote NO on both the silly and unnecessary library plaque and the lease of parkland to a for-profit light show promoter. Our Central Park is an island of nature in our ever developing city and needs to be protected and not exploited. Thank you, Brian F. Reilly From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommOsurfdty-hb.orq Subject: FW:Concerned dtizen Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:22 AM From:Ashley Crawford<ashleylhicks@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 3:54 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Concerned citizen • Some people who received this message don't often get email from ashleylhicks(c�gmail.corn.Learn why this is important - Hello city council, Regarding the agenda items for city council meeting 2/18/2025, I am highly concerned. The library 50th anniversary plaque I absolutely do not want our city spending money on a useless and embarrassing plaque for the library.What is the final cost involved?Thousands of dollars? My daughter asks why our parking lots and streets are full of broken pieces and holes.Why is that?! If we have thousands to spend then fix the potholes in our streets or fix the city parks with broken slides!That money could be spent buying new children's items for the library or updating the children's section of the library. How about fixing the fountain outside of the library?How about continuing to update our city infrastructure? Maybe you could clean up the city beach bathrooms! Help El Ranchito rebuild on Main St! Symphony of Flowers This is a huge no thank you! I do not seethe need for nor do I desire an expensive light show to take part of our beloved park.The cost per ticket is too expensive,the park doesn't need an event and I want to be able to park in the parking lots to use the library and park without worrying about all the space being used for some event! Find another . option to raise money for our city. I am often embarrassed by our city council-as in YOU. Each of you.The ridiculous way you talk,the things you say that make no sense or do not represent our city interests (certainly not mine!) not to mention the way most of you dress! I cannot understand why some of you dress so unprofessionally. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Ashley Crawford, a concerned HB citizen From: Kevin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FIN:Plaque and Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:27 AM Original Message From:Joan Wood<jwoodsb@gmail.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 3:5.8 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Plaque and Symphony of Flowers [Some people who received this message don't often get email from jwoodsb@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.mslLearnAboutSenderldentificatiou] Dear City Council members, I am an independent voter,tired of partisan politics in our city.You know exactly what you're doing by installing a MAGA plaque at the Central library.It is inappropriate. If I can sway your vote on anything,I hope it will be on the planned Symphony of Flowers.I walk in Central Park every week and believe this will cause irreparable environmental damage.It will affect wildlife and the serenity of the park...not a responsible use of tax dollars. Thank you, Joan Wood Sent from my iPad From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCa�surfcity-hb.orq Subject: RN:Symphony of Flowers-Concerned HB Citizen Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:32 AM From: Missy Coffman <missyanncoffman@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 4:14 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMG STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers-Concerned HB Citizen Some people who received this message don't often get email from missyanncoffmanCa�gmail.com.Learn why this is important Dear City Council Members, • As a citizen of Huntington Beach I'm sending this email to urge the City Council to vote NO on the Symphony of Flowers project. Besides the negative ecological impact it will have on our beautiful Central Park,the exhibit will take away from, not add to or improve,the natural beauty of the park.Why install anything that will draw our gaze away from the natural surroundings? I'm keeping my correspondence short and simple, but I know I am one citizen out of MANY who oppose this project. Please represent the citizens of Huntington Beach and do NOT continue with plans for the Symphony of Flowers. Frequent HB Central Park Visitor, Missy Coffman Email: missyanncoffman@gmai1.coni From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Oppose symphony of flowers in Central Park Date:. Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:40 AM From: Laura Klepfer<lauraloklepfer@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 4:30 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Oppose symphony of flowers in Central Park Some people who received this message don't often get email from IauraloklepferCagmail.com•Learn why this is important I would like the city council to oppose The symphony of flowers at Huntington Central Park East. I do not see how it will not adversely affect resident and migrating birds that use the pacific flyway. In fact, it will adversely affect the beauty,wildlife and peace of being in the park.Thank you, Laura Klepfer From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(@surfcity-hb.orq Subject FIN:Agenda 25-017 Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:45 AM Original Message From:tjengland4l@yahoo.com<tjengland41@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 4:33 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda 25-017 [Some people who received this message don't often get email from tjengland41@yahoo.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiou] Your Environmental report is meaningless if it is not an independent Environmental Statement! Show us your report.I don't believe your results! 100,000 lighted flowers,&500,000 LEDs,loud music speakers,people,and noise won't disturb the park? The 6 acres of the meadow will be covered with tarps,plywood,and electric diodes screws into the turf.These areas will go unwatered for 8 months.It will take thousands to restore the grass and plants,and years for the trees to grow. Bleachers& concessions,including beverage,snacks,merchandise, sponsorships?Sounds like a carnival!And damage to the wildlife and structure is unimaginable! Just exactly how much is a"portion"of tickets,food,&beverage in dollars and cents?Why do we only get 60%of the parking fee if they're using our parking lots? What annual restoration fee are we talking about? Why is this contract for 3 years? Our park will not recover from this assault in 4 months!!! Please as with the Airshow contract,don't hide this! Please SHOW US THIS CONTRACT! AND LEAVE OUR PUBLIC CENTRAL PARK ALONE! NO on 25-017 Sent from my iPhone T.J.England,6571 Peggy Circle,HB,CA,92647 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommi)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:No on the symphony of flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:19:57 AM From: MEG ROBINSON<twokyu@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 5:11 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: No on the symphony of flowers No on the symphony of flowers This is a terrible idea. Our Central Park is a treasure. Its inhabitants include numerous species of birds, ducks, geese, hawks and eagles,turtles, lizards,ground and tree squirrels,groundhogs, mice, rats, raccoons, and coyotes. It's a virtual zoo in an urban setting. All of these will be affected negatively by the Symphony of Flowers show. I have read the Environmental Impact report which presents more questions and concerns than it does answers. Re:noise:What is the expected noise level? I could not find this info in the report.Also if needed, how will the noise be quieted down to 60 dBA as reported when this is the level of normal conversation.Who will hear the show? Lights:There will be addition of lighting which is claimed to be low level compared to ambient lighting.Was this measured?This is particularly important since the report states "if installation of the Project's lighting results in substantially greater increased nighttime illuminance,these species, and others using the BSA, could potentially be 'subject to altered physiological processes, decreased habitat availability, and increased predation. " The report also states there will be surveys by biologists. Many of these seem to be pre- activity.Why wouldn't they be ongoing since the added light, sound, and human presence are all known factors that negatively affect the fauna of our great Central Park. The report also uses a great number of euphemisms such as" not expected to, not anticipated to, less than significant impact, and not expected not to substantially increase which you all seem to present as a definitive there will be no problem. I believe you are not being truthful in your representation of this Project,that you are unrealistic and are ignoring the problems it will bring not only to the park but to the surrounding area, least of all with traffic and parking. Furthermore you are delusional in your estimates of the financial gains it will bring to the city compared to the deleterious effects it will have on the citizens and the parks quality of life. For these reasons I am imploring a NO vote and ask you to let well enough alone for once. Meg Robinson HB 20 year resident From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.ora Subject FIN:Symphony of flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:20:01 AM Original Message From:Georgann Stay<gstay@me.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 5:26 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of flowers [Some people who received this message don't often get email from gstay@me.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiort] Please save our beautiful park from foot traffic and lack of water because of the symphony of flowers.Our families enjoy all that the park provides. It is a beautiful open green space where children run and adults stroll.Shutting off the water and allowing the public access to that area will damage the grass,trees,and shrubs a result.We value are environment more.Please vote against the Symphony of Flowers and for the continued green spaces in our beautiful Huntington Beach! Gigi Stay From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCa)surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:Symphony of Flowers-Request to table Date: - Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:20:20 AM From:Gab<gabriela_menendez@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 5:51 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers- Request to table Some people who received this message don't often get email from gabriela menend_ez(@yahoo.corrt. Learn why this is important Dear City Council Members, I am writing to express my significant concerns regarding the proposed location for the upcoming vote for the Symphony of Flowers event, and its impact on our park.While I acknowledge the efforts invested in the environmental study, I respectfully disagree with several of its conclusions and believe the chosen venue presents considerable challenges to preserve it. My understanding is that similar events held at the beach have demonstrated success, suggesting that alternative locations may be more suitable and pose less environmental risk. Therefore, I strongly urge you to reconsider the current proposal and explore the viability of relocating the event to a our city beach or another appropriate alternative. I understand a vote is scheduled for tomorrow's meeting, and I sincerely hope you will carefully weigh the points raised here before casting your vote. I believe a change of location would better serve the event's objectives and minimize potential negative impacts. Respectfully, Gabriela Menendez. _ From: Levin.Shannon To: suDolementalcomm(a surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:The Light Show in the Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:20:22 AM Attachments: SoortsCenterNight.PNG Signaturs.PNG From: larry mcneely<Imwater@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 5:47 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:The Light Show in the Park I want to go on record as opposed to this event. Please mark me down as a NO to this use. While I am not opposed to events being held at our park and beaches,the length of this event is way too long and will have a lasting impact on our access and use, as well as all the fauna,flora, and animals that reside in our park. Our Parks are designated as a public place for all in our community to use, not a place to make up for revenue shortfalls.Their EIR is full of misinformation; I would like to point out that it claims the Sports Center is used mainly during the day. The Sports Center has Lights.As a neighbor and a business owner whose office is across the street, I can vouch that I see it used almost nightly.They are on many nights long after my late nights in my office. I will not be baffled by BS reports or studies provided by a paid entity that produces them for a given outcome for the fees they will collect. Claims are being made that this area of the park is rarely used. As I can vouch for,the location where this will be held enjoys much evening traffic.Travel by it before dusk, and you will see the Gothard parking lots full of cars. There are many comments on this use on the forums.The one with the most support has 22 likes (Thumbs Up).As you can see, a petition drive that started Sunday has 429 signatures from people who DO NOT Support This Use. I have included a cursory review of the emails sent to you,which also shows that you DO NOT SUPPORT THIS USE. I recall when all of you ran for office, knowing that our voices had been ignored and we would see a change. This may be a test of hearing our voices and numbers matter. In a democratic process, numbers decide the outcome of any vote. }} «�e. � w:=��..�r. �,3, g� .�.,��. ff �. Ifs ,1� +•a ,.����t�� � ���''i� �•. :1 ..t: 0-'�:�.,.�X �» ,� �A .�,, :� • �.a�F a4. .' '*.,,``•tt.:•, l cxi ',r' ? 1 s.;,� d .."�. .�.yr•�3 g �. •d.f�",a. de R .f'w # B.,,1' 4. i 1 " ? ', �� <. .,e 's �a `,,#:, ;fie ems. >F". -� a.: ;.; ', -� ' ,,,, ' : ' ,• .,�, x+« �- ,•,?}• g. ,- .r �; � '� .�" ��� 1 � �;.' z fi p�s*. r .,,, ?z� s a e.i • ' ,F'. ,ram °x;;''9 Kt": by ti '1 d.h .. .�� �_ y,p� ,��, ��� "F.��t x� ,a ��^�.'4. a�"a,°�4��r�eb�s.��.u',,,w—ittirag„L---7.�- ��b Raga .::,,,:i t .. , ry;., ',. �" s a ''Z�' .,, . ?: 3 9 x , �` .. E '�" M rs y �,.. g" :. $ + rc , otr a,,,,,,t,,, �d Jd � p a1 urr m� a Yl �� �01j. Central t 1r 0 ,A ' � '.a k 3° t 4 .._ . rg: � gi �k � �� y ( :p t [ �• i`Yo• .� #! � T�� a � }� :. �`C? "$ •;tk:, . fll , ' #� m " k,:ar i!'lk S- � : p _.., to fr*F j p 6 .. t f . e y _ y1C 7pi ♦ ,7't �},8r, £� 4 -ro; te". H r ' y t { 2 „ y ■ F�i` s n z..e4. daF i � k qq ' % - . -t �g €Q;', . . i W , € g , . " m s;,..._., •x* yy'7 Zs s, ,.y , ; _,...._..,.• at e. a - x ,1 :»,1P ' s,- • 1. - ,xa,� .. ,.. . .,mob Y —. .x e• i' N .,.v s .a - - ., -,.; a' fi W; ° r aR :'it_�" iPrevent n t installation o Show in Park East That Could Harm Wildlife0,. ,.,_. '4,',..:40.1 ,.. „..„1 .,0440.0.,, ._..„ .1.,..4•409r,,.., ,,,. •••:..., '41$11111W1A4t';!5 428 .. 4tialmt." rlorltr- , ,,.,...,,..444,,,„: • iy w a .s ? as ,,k..?:.:i; !.z.giki3i ;stotr;,..,•, , „.l.;.:::...xtfiz,v,;..,, dF3 fr.r' . �.pa 3 c z • 4 •r. Verified signatures• vr ''4.• ,:f"::••'':],%t''''401:014.''Zt:".,4 ''.:* :4';'' 4.3trt,,Y°W.,,,,V037,;.407 .:•.: ,•,:ki-51. ; � ' y �* Thanks to our su ort this etirion lias a is F ° y .r , . ,'. *� chance at winning!We only need 72 mare as a" r _ g � a� ° signatures to'reac4,1 h the next goal-can you �° e • help? '3.. .. '�h '._i v fj4 :5 ..,, ,1 b. v ' •}. _ _} .}+step! From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW: #24 25-017 Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:20:37 AM Original Message From:Debra Gala<debragala@gmail.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 5:59 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:#24 25-017 [Some people who received this message don't often get email from debragala@gmail.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatioii] I will continue to protest the ill conceived symphony of flowers light show.It would be a travesty to co-op this open space and turn it into a drone light show when open space is at a minimum and premium in our wonderful city and should not be squandered for a few dollars.A school football field with bleachers or other sports with seating and readily available parking would seem to be a viable substitute. Don't pollute our city with this flash I.The pan light show/thanks you,Debra gala-30 year resident,voter and patriot Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.org Subject: RN:Proposed sound and Light Venue Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:20:47 AM From: Mark Singer<mark_a_singer@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 6:23 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Proposed sound and Light Venue • Some people who received this message don't often get email from mark a singeryahoo.com.Learn why this is important Dear City Council: I have been a 43-year voting resident of the City of Huntington Beach. My wife, children, and I used Central Park frequently during those years. My kids learned to ride bikes in the park.We would take walks in the park and enjoy being in a fantastic urban open space.We visited the park's restaurants and enjoyed picnicking in the park. My kids made great use of the playgrounds in the park. It was and still is an excellent Huntington Beach facility. However,the proposed sound and light venue project will be a great eye-sore and diminish the park's beauty. It will take away an important open space area enjoyed by park users and both migratory and resident birds. Migrating birds, especially ground-feeding species, use that park area to fatten themselves for long flights. Many of these migratory species make their home in that area throughout winter. Bluebirds have made their home in that area, and now that will be lost. I know because I am a bird watcher and visit that park area frequently. The park's beauty will all be lost because a for-profit company uses public land at the expense of the City's residents and the critters in the park. No mitigation will fix that,which will be lost. Huntington Beach needs these open areas. I,therefore, strongly reject this proposal and urge the City Council to vote it down. Mark Singer 8382 Bluff Circle Huntington Beach From: Levin.Shannon To: suoplementalcomm(@surfcity-hb.orq Subject: RN:Symphony of flowers project Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:20:58 AM Original Message From:Amp Yahoo<arline@razouk.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 6:38 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of flowers project [Some people who received this message don't often get email from arline@razouk.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] City Council of Huntington Beach, I am NOT in favor of this project in Central Park east.The trees,bushes,grasses,wildflowers&wildlife,let alone we lovers of nature and HB residents would be detrimentally impacted.A few thousand dollars for the city does not seem worth it. Please consider another location in an undeveloped area of the city. arline pohlman From: Levin.Shannon To: sunolementalcomm(a surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FIN:NO on the Central Park light Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:21:08 AM From:Tracy Luth <p.luth@verizon.net> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 6:57 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Fw: NO on the Central Park light Sent from the all new AOL aoo for iOS Begin forwarded message: On Friday, February 14,2025,8:32 AM,Tracy Luth<p.luthC6verizon.net>wrote: - I am writing again to express my disagreement with your plans to put a light show and fences in Central Park.You have been informed several times that putting up fences and shutting off the water for essentially 3 years will damage and kill most of the trees,flowers and shrubs in the area. Volunteers along with city employees (I assume) have spent ten years restoring this area.So much for"we will protect our parks" on your campaign signs.There are plenty of beach and commercial parking lots that a light show can be set up on. Again,such a disappointing city council....elections will come around again and I for one will remember . Tracy Luth Sent from the all new AOL ago for iOS From: Levin.Shannon To: supolementalcommCla surfcity-hb.orq Subject FW:Central Park Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:21:29 AM From: Mary Tomasek<jmtomasek17@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:13 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Central Park Light Show Some people who received this message don't often get email from jmtomasek17(Nmail.com.Learn why this is important Please respect the remaining green space and wildlife in Huntington Beach Central Park as well as the Huntington Beach citizens who live adjacent to the park. DO NOT approve the proposed light show. Respectfully, MaryTomasek From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCa surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:HCP East Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:21:52 AM Original Message From:Liga Auzins<llauzins@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday,February 17,2025 8:28 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:HCP East [Some people who received this message don't often get email from llauzins@yahoo.com.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification I We so desperately need our very few open space areas and parks especially for our health.Also it is one of the most important stop over for bird migration.In our metropolis I cannot emphasize how important that is.I feel this is a travesty and will diminish the quality of life for many many people.There is no other place like HCP East.What about HCP West? That has been able to accommodate things like the Sr Center and Frisbee golf.There is plenty of room there which is not as critical an area as HCP East.Please I beg you to not compromise our quality of life that Huntington Beach has always prided itself on being a leader in keeping and maintaining the quality of life in so many areas which contributes to the recognition that Huntington Beach is a highly desirable place to live. I thank you for your attention to this crucial dilemma. Thank you for reading my note. Liga Auzins Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Feedback on agenda items for February 19,2025 council meeting Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:22:46 AM From:Janet Michels<janetbmichels@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 9:03 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Feedback on agenda items for February 19, 2025 council meeting City Council, I write to you with respect to 2 items on the agenda for tomorrow night's city council meeting. The Library Plaque: I attended last week's Commission meeting and listened carefully to - the speakers,which as you know, overwhelmingly rejected the plaque's design while overwhelmingly supported a plaque commemorating the 50th anniversary. Most speakers were articulate in their positions,with a recurrent theme...why wouldn't you want a plaque that the entire community would support and appreciate? Why select a design intended to provoke a large and vocal negative response? I've watched all of you speak,get sworn in, and identify as"adults in the room" (looking at you Mr. McKeon)and wanting to bring people together(most of you have said as much time and again) You really had a chance here, and personally I think you are blowing a real opportunity....now you are getting emails from people who voted for you, all in,. questioning your choice here. I'm still hopeful that 4 of you will wake up tomorrow and decide this is not the legacy you want to leave for your time on city council. Please do the right thing, say you are listening to the community,you understand why some people might not support the design, and vote NO on this item. Symphony of Flowers: Cool idea,wrong location. Simple as that. Find an undeveloped lot in the industrial area and put it there, if such a place exists in HB. These installations, similar to Sensorio in Paso Robles, are great but usually put in an open field where disruption to the community and wildlife is minimal. The money you will receive for it is minimal as a budget helper, and looks like we will subsidize by paying for parking attendants needed to route traffic. Vote NO on this item, and make a plan to locate the installation in a location less disruptive to the community. Sincerely, Janet Michels Janet Michels 714.448.3095 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolernentalcommCa surfcity-hb.org Subject FW:Agenda Items 25-102&25-107 February 18th CC Meeting Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:22:53 AM From:donnadillon214@aol.com<donnadillon214@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 9:26 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Items 25-102 & 25-107 February 18th CC Meeting Some people who received this message don't often get email from donnadillon214Ca�aol.corn Learn why this is important Mayor Burns, Mayor Pro Tern McKeon, and Council Members. First, I'd like to say I'm enthusiastic and optimistic about the leadership and direction of our city and our country. I understand you and this council have some challenges that need to be addressed specifically the city budget deficient, but I hope you will listen to your supporters and constituents when considering solutions. I appreciate that the last time the license agreement with Flowers of the Sky Entertainment was on the agenda, Council pulled the item pending further research and investigation. However, I still urge you to vote NO on this agenda item. I have read the EIR in the addendum, and I disagree vehemently with the general conclusions that there will be no impact on the natural resources of Central Park, on the migrating birds and wildlife, and on traffic congestion to the surrounding streets and neighborhoods. I compare the EIR to HSS Mayorkas saying the US border is under control during the last administration. Most of the residents of our city are opposed to this. Please listen to us. Also, on the agenda is item 25-102. Please reconsider the design of the commemorative plaque celebrating the 50th anniversary of HBPL. Even an ardent supporter of you and this Council can see this as a blatant use of the MAGA acronym which creates division. I hope you would want to unite all residents of our city, and this plaque design creates a wedge. Regards, Gregory Dillon 714 319-3581 22102 Jonesport Ln Huntington Beach, 92646 From: Levin.Shannon To: uoolementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Opposition to the Symphony of Flowers Light Installation at HBCP Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:22:54 AM From: Rebecca May<rebeccamayfotos@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:40 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Rebecca May <rebeccamayfotos@gmail.com>;Van Der Mark, Gracey<Gracey.VanDerMark@surfcity-hb.org>; Burns, Pat<Pat.Burns@surfcity-hb.org>;Strickland,Tony<Tony.Strickland@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Opposition to the Symphony of Flowers Light Installation at HBCP Some people who received this message don't often get email from rebeccamayfotosCagmail.com.Learn why this is important Rebecca May 6241 Warner Ave SPC 130 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 rebeccamayfotosPgmail.com February 17, 2025 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Opposition to the Symphony of Flowers Light Installation at Huntington Beach Central Park East Dear Huntington Beach City Council Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Symphony of Flowers light installation at Huntington Beach Central Park East.As a local photographer and wildlife advocate who frequents this park, I have witnessed firsthand the incredible biodiversity that calls this area home.The proposed installation,with over 100,000 luminous flowers and 500,000 low-emitting LED lights choreographed to music, poses a serious threat to the delicate balance of our park's ecosystem. Central Park East is not just a public space—it is a sanctuary for a vast array of wildlife that relies on this habitat for survival. Every year,we see great horned owls nesting and raising their young on both sides of the park. Hummingbirds, red-tailed hawks, Cooper's hawks,western bluebirds, bushtits, mallards, Egyptian geese, Canada geese, coots, and green herons are just a few of the many bird species that depend on this park.We also have native wildlife such as squirrels, lizards, monarch butterflies, bullfrogs, red-eared sliders, skunks, and raccoons. Many of these animals rely on foraging on the ground, and the proposed light installation will disrupt their natural behaviors, displace them from their habitat, and lead to long-term ecological consequences. The introduction of excessive artificial lighting will have significant negative effects, including: - Disrupting Nocturnal Wildlife: Many species, including great horned owls and raccoons, rely on darkness to hunt and navigate their environment. Bright artificial lights can disorient them.and impact their ability to find food. -Altering Bird Migration and Nesting Patterns: Light pollution is known to interfere with bird migration. Birds use natural cues from the moon and stars to navigate, and excessive lighting can cause confusion, leading them away from safe habitats. Nesting birds may also abandon their nests if disturbed by the continuous presence of lights and crowds. -Reducing Insect Populations: Many birds and small mammals rely on insects for food. Artificial lights attract and disorient insects, leading to population declines and disrupting the food chain. -Increasing Foot Traffic and Habitat Degradation:The additional crowds this event will draw will place undue stress on the park's natural spaces.The presence of thousands of visitors will lead to soil compaction, damage to native vegetation, and disturbances that can drive wildlife away permanently. As someone who documents and shares the beauty of this park with our community multiple times a week, I can assure you that a significant number of residents are opposed to this project. People visit this park to experience its tranquility, observe wildlife, and find peace after long days of work. Introducing a three-year-long artificial spectacle will completely alter the park's natural atmosphere and drive away the very wildlife that makes it so special. I also want to highlight that protected species have been observed in our park, including bald eagles and the Ridgway's rail—both of which are federally protected birds.The presence of such species means that any disruption to their habitat could result in violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Endangered Species Act.The legal and ethical implications of such a decision must be considered before moving forward with this proposal. As a member of the LA Arboretum, I have seen firsthand how temporary light installations impact wildlife. Even when done on a short-term basis, birds vacate the area, and the grounds suffer lasting damage. I cannot begin to imagine the long-term consequences of a continuous three-year light display in Huntington Beach Central Park East. While I understand that financial incentives may be a motivating factor for this project, I urge you to prioritize environmental stewardship over monetary gain.The health of our local ecosystem and the well-being of the wildlife we share this space with must come first. I strongly urge you to reconsider approving this project and instead focus on initiatives that preserve and protect our city's natural spaces. Attached, I have included photos of some of the birds and wildlife that will be directly affected by this proposal. I hope these images serve as a powerful reminder of what is at stake.These creatures do not have a voice, but I will continue to speak up on their behalf. Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope the City Council will make the responsible decision to preserve our park for future generations. I would appreciate a response on how my concerns are being addressed. Sincerely, Rebecca May Wildlife &Nature Photographer Huntington Beach, CA it gi• jai a.':v ' j • a ti 9 ki {"- • '� ,�$',^.'A• F $� _# ,3,:�- 5'Fro.. 1. (i Y t . Ida. _ ° • . a b r b ..t,,,,,.,..,.:,::.:'..,,,E:"' i721..• ..'.n",/...k4,\ , '''''. .N.'"'\ :),42,,,,, .:''',;.:';471 ,.• ' .'•".i.'''k .k.,,,.lot A.,.\ i 1 . ' i .. °1 41, ,<'a:� a°,� �,tm; °�:�?y.^. '+;�t'+"� .V �•�.rz..ar,g« .°^2'�i:•''.,' .'sr -tea`°"s n� ','z � `h 6�`'•. .i•� '%;.:'ass: ,}, �':. � •q 5an''.�e "'' 'E;'kq�fN;yyw,.f :;$n}' ?.:a;- qr. •7`. . yymv<n. '•`z: ;g.'. "%3aC, a =<rr;�:�_ <:„a: :?�.�s^':: •.�x..,y' ✓�3+'s' a 'iN .�.. �fc;". gy �=-._v.: �'> >.,s�;.. :x,}:,';..« 'J'•� „).�i ?".p✓i::� �...{.;v�.•ts'.3.: N.�i�i<, s ..s "^ z i a t Y e' :5s` y5, • €aa� „�g�- ,�` ��;y4t _ , i'.,. :<a•%"o�ssaa;,^ `�:�` > • .�:� ": 's' ems' „:az •.,,, <&`>',_ •.:. " ` ,'' -�.: •; x rR, ��a* S u „ 4 .,.�22s-.£•`�ha - .. � > .:. ., ..<..�•..,<,/�fg f, < 7 T F r• yy r d ,,,g g 3• ��p � ,y+.,v4� �$'= 4'Lts�•� ",Vw' ����..�,�"" $,� Y„n,�:.h' j&;':z�i,• � '•y,i ry,,, ,r�, „ y ,:k '¢x,i, :,g;;.r:s i'.. 'Y•, „ L.r° likt �3 »a ,,',•••;',.,*, ..40-- •.. '� 4 i$ �.s i � Y f j 4 1 y}/ 6 g tl as ,y :14'4'''''i4:4; � b` .. � . ., .,46,.. -t-IF t., - 4 Rik $ ^ . r 4 Ay K +1 _ baw 5 'H 6, R �y 'R S” e �"}jy I�g<a� F; y } • y 4 :` fie! #„ '-g > 1 � 1. 4 �% to yi ' a4 4il4 c,�l a ppp��j''' x 1S k: $ ,.. - :. �,- Aitt. . ' yg +q • • Nra S�' emu' • PIr ... +Q 4 t a. 4 ow. mow,.. CC ,w `�. � '♦ a .s, ..g� . 5 y, .1� y.., .. E """ten. +». + •ate.-as • i ,, '"�' '°�R: j e „. g�„,w�'e _ g. ... mom:; • ,T .. �`�� « .m A. - _- _ :"Lrv`• n� 1 fix- - •�' ;::, ., ''1..*:',4"--): :• ,, , .� 2 4%**0-444*''' -"-"*;"'"'`'-7,7;,..,.:„...".„, - .;,...:...,:ti..44441;t7:04.tr.:::::::,...:,::.:"...„.....:., ,,,,, .,:,_ , :...,.,:.:::.,...:: ,:..::.:.:::.41z.: . ....giii440."- :,, ;..,0: ,,_,,,. .',. 7' ; 100:44 4, "i ,,,,,c..* 4.1 - ,,. _ 4! _ 4. a.. ef' its ». i . t. 4 . y. .p,. ... .� a• 3'a'• ..y y . 4 S. if ." ma. r;s f.•.4 ape; ,ya`* .. as , 11 '11 -okr.....•: _..-,......„ . kiiiiiikob,. . . „ . .. . -ti, .;. ---- - _ .. „_.. .-.,-,„.0 - ...40.\,,,„ -,...: ,,, .t,-,,,,,o..„.....;.:,-,,,-_____,2....s..4.„,. ....,.,... , _ ..., „..„. . ,.. „. , ..„ .„,.. • . - ' - ‘ '$ '- .---.4440 - ..,. . , .,, / -----011- - 1 ' ' ..,„..- - x - { ., , ..:„..„,,,,, .;,. ,-...4 �a ,„ . ,*„..„.„—.,.4„ ... ..t...t. , . . „ .. .., ....,,,,, , .. .._ ..., ..,.. ,..,. ... , .... , „.„ .,„,„21.-, . . qatrW . , ",-7•2•'''''• ,...‘,'• .0''2 . . , -2 . ' _ - - .'s... r, • •"� "may a - 4:04 „,3,,.._.:„..,.,:. :-.......:,.alt.iii...„. ' , , 'i� r f 11 •d u . �TM i � s tiff .40 i•" mS $ # 1 "erg '45 a s ' i , ,-,.. 1. ,A '," ' i ji t f 1 a„ 4 i i '",",,,,\, , , 1 1 4 144. e #, t g i, • * '' 2®a %. .,,, f::':."-", I„ -11 i40,,-- ,..,,‘,. it, I , '— i 1 ,su ki:'!,,..:':',1-,,,,, \::f.t,,,,,4s:,* '1.1 ,,,,;,,,,,„::, .tii,....,„",,,,.;,,,..;744, 44:=;:!:,:,',',"::..,:.:',1:".,:tii.,...ii.::ii;,:;I::;44,.'!''':, t'' t'„,i,,0110: ';',"1"'3,4',i)ii,,,,:",'''''":::' l''''',41-',:,:li'l'i'''''Citi;, '';:i.i:::1:.!i'l''i:j":4;:1:11:.;::'' i'i!:11( l'' -41:4*:' ;�, gyp, g 'TM�'a - .. a Y r, ,a% -,�a ➢a' 4 3 Y '$ ;gyp "�,s rc `K' �. 'a �` 9 a'l'df a� g, fV �F r a.� & : ^ 4 - p }} 1g s � f aim ' ' ; , { •iti> a • , � a • x• ' �4 4 p. ;� �, �k ;� .'` .., ,Alt". ,', . ., "a. d n,s# i s 4, *'4,0 `� s ,aa ' # `.r � ,,,r<, ££ i S :fig. n�N. xt •s ry • • • ...ewe .r n ..::.. .�.. ..wa.• -.., u .,.>..� n €s x • en� 'ql!et'.....:: .... 2.4"=•e-,X: t „.:.....,*.*:' '......,::4„.::.tEsi•:.,••:.:e!':4;;It'.'=:=1::::ititilt-•..-.c.":::•]!•,, -1' •,40,4='' • ,,-- ''''''''' . "''''14:•"ft,,,Iti:-t4iteoki.4:?4-. ..,.;•i'k:;'.''..":=:'...,...1: :=•,..Z.=','tighiiiigqilit:C,71 . . ...; • „. . • -=',.= • • tt,,,, „,„. '•, .t ,.::....4„:: :...:,'„4.!:41.5•Yt;..4..MN:•'::'"ii,if4k., ., , ,,, ::,,.;.::.;:.:o•rtititi:m= •...4:0t.v.kt.l., „••=::..,..t--tittti=titttt•- , •t•=t • . . , •t, = r::••;.=1•..;44fit-.14,.:::;. 4.,.,=.,.....tt,?'•t:-'tt• ,„-k-t4.,=?00";...„,,:R4,, 4-•,,,,tr„-it,.,.=,•,. . „ =.,„ t,.... ' , kiirtiit'tt,t=•=-.:=N:L ,t ply,e;.ti,•,' ,,. ,,,,t.- ' '. •t=„--**ii.• - „It.tt)",',F;' :-' „„• . , •,..4-i' „ 4 ''' • • ,Yi7C ••;:r 4 4444, , ,•.'"::,1• '•:::J'.. 4 14. 1 4".4', ', _X;'.a f,i,„•,,,,,ii k,4"1 . „ , ,- '' ,',""!;''''' ' ' ..,-;4...'4 4''',,,.'44:7'4",444,'''',;`..:,-"t r•:le, . , :'.1°. '..'„. .;:.e.,',,--*. ' '..11:0',.:"4. ,- .. l ',.'!'-:,.!';'ik-'," - :,-,--, Aro'.-,.,A11111!--'''•'' ",--,-..."-:. . • •......,v-.•:-..-" •t...,-4t.iii:v• -•-:::,. z,,. . . • , . - -- „......, 4 . lki,,, .-':":„.!..--..;,...,,,,.....,:':•i••• ' .....-----1-.7' • •,,-„,!..4.: '... •• .:1 ,•,::, ,•,..ortl:!1•:::::,,,,,,,..t,•v....,,= '•0.: ..-7 ,44,17tAtt4•P',,t.,.-tt,•-; ... .;---,0%' .. „. .,.7:f?.7,,,,, ,,,...,,.,;.„.-ii,„--,,,,,:MV.N•.-4..T.i.„•...:!•••,,1:1Wt•,..,-;::.!•:::::•t"..it't' t,..Yt° tti!,g.e:-•,4=off •,A,10, "'"ist'w-•' 112. ,,',,';',.;J• .:--• : •••',,,,''.''',,4-'If-4-t%i:IA•fie,&..4 .1ti .,*,e1511160‘!. ';',.:";:A ',..''•:''''' i-- .' : *404.' 't•• -' it:15? "f - 4'.';':',:l'::°:iel;i:;:',:',4:=.• ?:"Ileita5:4:,:6A:ttr,*ViiNg,:....;',,I•:.•''.'e•.i. ... .•._ Ifv.. .,, . , .••v: ,,,,, ,,,:••;:::.••4:- ,. ..41:N-4„....t4,..„;,,,,,,wit,,,,-.441stig,,,,:,.:: ::: .4,04..ezzi,,zowni.,,,,404•:,!•1• ....,,- ., , ,-ito,-. ..., , :41:'" '-'''' ("'„V-gi'... •:::',..4i4iki.,•1.:;:'::':':',.•4040%.;40.415.1411:1041,10):.V. :-., 7 !,;':ii. '),,c'''''''' t' 'It '. 1*': .' • . ,,,,-c.,4- iff-,*;!.'44:,N,!„',,,,::.:',44114.04'.'"'.,*,--A-‘013:AO:V;i1,;',;:,,.I.`41%".;-0''-'-:-.ir.'-';--''''". ' "PW •t: 4 , ..,., "''MO'•,;•,..:iffil:''T.4Q:AiWi'::::!;P:',Itaffi.,1-.-4019:61t;;1?!!.,ii::::::A„liigittinti.; •111 :`!,,:.:",l's''''',':'';' l'1"':''''';-:•••t•reltit";5',.:..,TbgaidelinglOirl'?: 11.0tfil::••Pr-f'''''' '''' ?.1t' '' ...; ; A-'k _ '',.' i 14,C'•. , at, '''',',4'. ' ::'-'r•:•*,'...:•••:•••••••ii:::::,:.Y6- :•:lliii:Natatitifi:V•4',;,-1>-4,1 :1,!:,,V,;•kl. ':': ,. ,..P;. f .,.,414)3''':4i,=,,,. '''' 0" V , -,,,, e; , ''-;••••,.•,•r,.:•,.: '..".!!!:::%1:5,-,'::.,?::004IIMENTMIA;;;,:,,,;,;11.4, -,..• '• .. .=:,':. i*, ',,:';,: •,,, r vs -!' *..,_,,•=41 1 ,,,,,, 4 • 40, .t.'',.:.:-. 101`0:::-•:!.„5..,t•:!1*1.!- • '-::.'•.• ;- .::, !''• 4. _.. :A.:..•.:..•,.:'A;,r:;,,...:•:'-' ''' ' '' '- • .:.„..„' '':;:. :. 7 • '''' " - -,' :. '‘ -,,.' ':'-‘, ""- :;:,,,,,,,q4.`..;•-•,..,-•:••.•:;;;::!::...:,••••:. . • . . . ..<••-:istiqi4;.,-•— -.._, i:F:iiir; 4,..„.T.' ."; •* : - -'- ,.'". ' - " : '", -,' ,„4-;,',,'" „ , ',,,,",..,2°4'iV,"-:,,,2::':•4:',:•-", ,',:..•;.....,„. .,,,,,-;-,', :-: ..:2‘..."2.t--27:;t:i4i•-,. ,g„ ..,,,..,,, ,,:' ' ' -"".:„ . ,., - • ''S,'.-.4tfriMt,'"'#'11*;Z:,:;,,,,,,,,'" g,,'44.4--.14C• - '' . iti i"--",'-'2-.:.4. • „ . .. . „ 1 iff -'°''''' ., . " • ' ',:i,.'',.A-,-":.- ,,>;':'',," ',''',f•Ifet:';A'',V;,','"'", '',4.-Wl eit't?.,totts;1•;._. Iiik,•:,-, :-.,..,,, ,„,t.1..„.._ ...,,,,17.1.,,, " .' -;:i.--:.,-''.:2:-,'-'- '...-'' ' '',-tty..t,-2: ' ' t 1 t'..=,:',,tt,..t:'tt••;t tl.:,ttt.4,41,16tittr: 'itt.it..,==t4iltint:N„,, a'44itittt'%:-.:i' .=4'4".'''''''•.1%,„„,1 stli...!.C="z' ' ''-.-:-':Z''' ',:•'." .A.'''** ,, •-t,".,,',.-,,,,14ttti .,itt:., ..t=.t.'4,tstrtttqA.- •', 't, „ ''t t=ttt t t''"''',','`t't•q*."Ititt,•&,.03.!OtAitOfFiRtX.'q,t, tt-!:-,ti,,„ glic•it•it144,' .1A • - - e -'''..,..A, . -z:;.Y't;,' It.A. Rt!....*-%-„- ' ,';'-'gt>.,;:l..'•,f;",,r, - ' '',- ,j,‘' ". , , , ,,.-'.'.. ..--'' „ '.,.,'' ,'!"'Al1P-";,..:-' ,-Z,"-:',:'-','";'„,niltiA7,:'44".X':, '",-" . ,'-,•,',,,,r----;. As::t.!!:A.,,,..-,2'.:'---A,-1,?,,,*"., 7°. ,itir::', ..,. :,-• ,4,,C„,,... ..,' " -'.":',..,?::' '' ' ' , •',-''''''' : ,,.' f '';,-," :, ' "'". ', ";:,*.fiti,';?;;':,, -,-.,-;::5-,.gi,ftli,!1,1,..`„7;1, 4774.5-...:.,.......teN.:, • - -•-•,..::„.c,,...40. .,,,,,„,,...::,--:••,4e,‘,A ,--•',. ttr,,,,;:, , ',';,...:,1:-.-. .., . . - :, -,-,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,-.,,' ,..,,,,,,,,.,,,,o4...-,-,.f., ...., - -- .,-,',A '1'- ...- • -,• '•' • ' ,,tt,'••4 v,.' rjalg, :'It' ' i,!-,•:'-' ,; , ,, , ,, ,„, „.>,„ ,,,, „t-.t,„,,t,=;,,,,,,;•,4,„:„.--...7-..,.t:,4,•„ft,,t=„tred,-;,Lf.,=.4, .•=.,..i.,•••••., :t„t•-•-• „•.•„,,t,-,4,y=0.-,,,,.:, ••'- tt„..• aVe ': ' - ,•:::-,; - ''-', ' "'':,,,,!, '-,' ' ,,.,,,',', ::''i': ' : f'i`,`-!: ',"4:'!'t,A.k0',:'',C.,i,:,,":',:',",, '.•P',;-'6W:61teiC'S: . ,[.k.k ,..,_ 46.4°.4•!7!:::14;,...,. • - ,,, -• P,k ,VA.4fik.4 ' " - '..+':'''''':''' '": '''''' " ',"::''',' ',..':'':',::-:'••'''.:'''.',''"' '''' '''i--, „';',71:ZRS.,,k..11.A.i1"1",,::;-'.:43t1.1•144?:kf .0t. , ,e -r ' .I =,...i., ,, t.,- ...- * =•=-e,. • t4=t,,t,„„.44:t.,-:ttt-tt-tt tti,..,;,441,==r41,-4.-t': . 20, ,' it=2.- •,- .--,:anitotv ,4 t.t;'.'.•'ttpit.tttt:',•.' t.,4 4,".'' '.31.4-f'-'*'':''9'!.:;;..',.'.:4,'",-;. <5,1,„,',:.','' •' ...;';',14 . ..,..,11 ' 11:'-':::::'.'0..' .:•‘•.,,_, 44.4, 7r".•:i to•o/:'', ' '' ,.,‘ ,,,,..,-`, ',.., ',''..:*'V.i.-'... ,.'‘' , , • '• ;0'4. ,•• ••.,• 0 ' '' • 4'. ' . '\*. :'.:4.,.,r .,'",. ,'. -- ,- 2 2, .::..— - ...,-....- , ,---.,--. --„— ,;"'"117,1-,,V-.--F:-''''''.„'„: '''','''."''.,2-7,,;:','.'::t,-''2' 't ..' _:-.1.-9-,:!';'.•i''' ' - -' , 2. . ..,. ., 21.;.:,,,,-1',,,-......,, : .„-,7J,;..i. ,-;,,,,, ,;.- ;,.:'1' .$,.. ,...-''',.,./ ,.. 0,4_, .,•,- ,,...;op. -2 , . .... , „,„ f..1. . ,r••• ie ,.,..,,,,,,,,r.u.-,,?..- .- " -','4',''''';-,t. .'c ',-',1k.' .,i . . ""k,'" ''' .„,4,*4„t`",' • 7-......"..;''.---,' 1- ,c,.., . . ,, -'`,::'.-A' ".:,, , : _.,...,,4,..,..",;,,,,p ik '1;.. 2.2. i. .,'.'"...",- •airs.,;,_. - ..f.-,',,, ,,-• . ......,.. ,:. . , '' ,,',",,WZ,I,':3',Lr;:',,' —',,,•,,,,,,i,`,17e'o-Aik:-.',',,-,,! , ,. ..,;,.., ,,'.-.2,-,..-.;.„01,,.-, , .-4';‘,4*--'4.4 -,,- 4.,.., .- - ' • . '"4.'-' .---., 4,,,A- -gt:===.=-4'..'w!‘•tt. .''t 14.t. :•.....:i-.5.%t..0i •,,,,,„,i.:, 'L ttt--'ttt-tAtt'4•Zttt.'"t '''.,tt4A4t.te•rtittftttgt,4.t..V• : , t„ttt-ti-f=,..4 itt tt•,.. 'tt.t-titt • •''''"' " ' :t•-•:•:•mt-t‘...,,er- „'t.K'i't.'-t,',,,,,'=,',,,tt.":,',:...'t','';''„t-=,t'.'',„tZ','t','I'ae'4tt-t',':,'''t'',oL'-i,-y-4.tt.,.o,-'at„;"tg,'<i'".t'r rt:4''t41,„t-„o„2,.,:,T 4•-,,',t:,,',t',':',,...v‘'„''-'.'-,..,'•-=,-.4.,'4"-,,:,1:,.,';,:-'4'',-,,:i,1,:t,:t,'1:-,;,i,-t,„;.'*,,.A4',„,r,=,,44"-,4„r.4,,=,4.,e,tI;..„1,'..,4511.,,,,,,.,,-„„,,,,•:,,,,,,,:',:--p,,,,,,,,A4g,.,., 7,,,,:'.,,-t:'i',„:,,,:,.7.t,iltt;.;---,,- ,i,,t„„,,,,„.„,..x,,,,,%., .'.tt,,,,t-,„,,,,,,,r,.,,a,,iv,„.„".,,.,,,,,..,..-„!.4.„4,..,4.,.,...„!,...;,,,o,1.,,,.,., 1..,.„,,,,,,c./';y,4_...,..-..,4,„,",,,',,,,.!,'":.,,".;*,-r,-,,,,,..,.',,,.<.,„'',,,',:t'A:t.t..,.4..'.'"•• .-..'",••;:t,s-'.4.t-.--e:'-'.."','-''-'-r•',::: .1.-t‘,'•'-.).•.•:.;tt::•':'.• 0It1Oi..t.'.!r,....'A..:..:.,0 4'•.41.,'1 A44tC:'o'4'4i"k..,r;,4,•,!t.,..,„4,`A4..1:4,''':.0:;"''r 2,,1i4-:'.'.t,..J•.7.."`:.t/i.•,A"l.1.,-:1li-k.4ff:,t.-'t.';.„'-''4-,4 J,:i'1.4?,,=,'1-,4=,•4,,'-'-.,' :• ,:4t'i,;.,.i'•!• :. "7- ,'„ii4111 .,F.'n',;. 41%,'Z''''';‘'.'''.'t,!...':2.., S;.; '.`•''''''''W'r',.'!''.7 '4: :', ''' '•4 SI.:.'" ''' .. - • :Ii;4,;,.- k°:..".,;t,.. * -.2 -",-.%, r,-, ",:14.,-Nk„, ' - , , -,'A, --:-‘,,,,, z:r.t'•,- , ' ',...„,,, ,,,:- 2••:'...4.,4,-,..t., .,,,; •..l'i t.'itt;t.•,‘t!„-- !"=,4-,,,- ,-<-`"-, .,,-,.., , ,.„',.,.,..-.,, .-=„.-,'-: '...,',.E_,^.'''-,0'l,',;t-..,a4.,k 4-'',",:,;-.4 0''1,:''!',.,--,‘,,,-,-<'2,-1..:,:.:..'.'4,'.,,,,t'.4-'..',;,:-L:'-`'.'. ,,''::,'_'.i.)•...-.",'...:.;'.:..,4'.::4..Az::i.:T.i,ii.i'rt„.,!,:I,::*-i!t„,'..,'„.,..y‘.',,,•,t,%;t•,,..:;:',:'.,"Vi1-•,,-„;-"A;';;,;M"AI- ..••'"' , j4v,,,,f ,',.-4--."-'•1'',,4 i.4,- ••;':,,w,,i,e;•A.:.z',",.,,t5..:-S"."',",.2"',kA''=4:4;;.)r;,;'..•'.4.''':Vt;t;,:r..".,'t•''••'.•-••,t 4A.=.A.40....!. ".,i'1"1.;:;*:t7:;!‘::q14.i.,r-,ir'.:,7.4'•. 1..' ,. .... • .t,.• . ,.,.„ , .,, ,---„,-,t ,,,,,,,-...1,:„,,;:,:,,,,„,,,,,,ilt,:z-;,,,,,,,fr„,,.,,,,‘,,, • . • ••.,.;• _,„„„..„:„.„:„,,,,,. .,„,"..,„:„..„ ::. _,„., .,...,w,•=4,,,,,,;„::•;.%.),,,4,=,,,,-.,'4,„t.,...,,,,,I,T.=.,,i.,.441 1::!,-: • ,-.. t'-';- '• tt 1-t,tiokf--,,,•=,t•=t, .t.:7:!4.41,-`:tttttt tt===-t4.='==•.==tif.,,,,,„.P=t,,,,,„--•=,, ',•-t,,-,t.?itt•tt•t•t't,t.tttt.",..tytttl*, i.t.t.',tt'..iootA'... .4:::',.. 34' • :kr 't',ft:t'It.'-',1=7,\,,:f;;:t!t-tt:tt,'7:,'''''':':±:tAir,S;tt":t-'-•;:•t:','.tttf11.1,ilf.t1:2„;'t=f''''''t;:tti:tt'-'•••.4!,17.7,t,=•t•.' '''''' ,-,,,Itti."''.'.:4.'.':',.•:,:t?"4.'•-4 ':::,..:!ii• .- t ..-- - '.t=•,.,. ,tk,'„,• .-„tt.., 4 t.,4=t1.=,-,-,,,,',.tt,-,==t,4t-t.'=„t•t4=-,•-t--..-...4- '•'7,4"'"" '' -.71"44''.1,:`-';',T--&--- -•"::. . , . "-:-„,-t,1L',',".--„„, "-. .,.:„-, -`;`,:"A'A.,,,;,„",''"".;"-,-;'," -,--,`,14 n,,•..,",.',- --,e-t.",',,1,0*:i - '',.'',','f':,"*'•T4.''''''',Wife, ''... . ter, Obly. ge it 4 4, _ ..,-, 41 ,... , , thalk. ,,, ..*:,:f ..„....1. , , .. ... , , • - '';'.,p ' , , .'- - w -40.00.4‘. _.. iii • 10, c , 1, a �x i# . N , a , a ,tjtiii at � z 9 .,,..ii. :,!,...i,I.,,::.,..'ilt....,‘, . . . - - till''''''''' ' .. •. - ...„. ......t....„.I.,.., .. ,.•.,:,;...i.......•,,,,...,..4.....!..,...............„:,.:::.:,.::•,:,.:i„.:.::!!„i-,,,,, . " 4, r z t xs7 417 *�as. � :a � '07...'4::,:.,:i..hr-74.'..Arr.w.--,:: - .41t,.-:-_- ,,ri:,!•";Aii em 4 ' 4;� k': o YP y �& J - . . 4 ..,.,-.....„.„,.::77-.. .." ,.X.' :,..1:7 ,,,,,•1#4• :;':-, ,:10,10 4 :,,:::„44444244',40:":'''..- .'•°•':' • •';':. 1.:';;°-''7''5 ' ' • li'l*.,.,••*;it. ,,I. c, ',.-.4,, :, ,-.4-RE, '•"----'. • ... . .:::.;$4,,,i,„...,,,,,,!;:4:.:-,N,H4]gialtim•••.-.;iltr". . .. .. •,:„:::!::::),:okitir: .:..,:;•:-.•.:„:. .c. „ :-"':,:itit. - - ,.. 8 ..*'.''''''.\. :..,4r, g'4' , , .''.1i;::.'11!'*''''';;4:44:',;°:-'1;4 . lic:; °',':!;:;.!;'',44'.:„§). `'•'.• I:' '�* £� s �� .° ,,e C Y Yw k a *° 0. �. + °••,, , ;:z.,,,'",*\Z, ''•.•1.•:-•:::,—:,,,••• 41:'''''': ': il'':i.'14:t::' v%i.. , ..a t * .s, '-','„i)itt;"'" t''''' ''''!' "'"'A.4114:,."4,;:titt .-Ii" :, '1?‘"-VIP--'"-''''''4i.,v, '''4,-,,t„;',N,..,',,",?.. - 0 • ' efri e � 6.; 4 "J•‘"' 4•••^.-- .. -4 ii.:1;j:;;',-'" ' " ,, .t.":".\.„'4,,•1- ', " - ,,,,„„." ,, ,,.0,,,,-..;44„,112-% *1.!, . . ° z s Iy `s w.. J • •....",\ f , Iiiiis,�. a m�ls ,,lk' ' � r ':. 19 a ' ' } 4 :. 4 ' 4 • om. �t x vA4 4 '', ,. .44, ,l'''''''t,'4...,-'..,:.'11: . r �' fW S i :1 = b yam. .ypr. ,y. . w 4 `lid, 5d6 x&c' .. Se ^6 illt ftw . 'y. C s s �" - ., Sty ,p • t 'r, • qi 3.� Kay Me - > ei ,ram ''C'',"''-:4' .,1.0‘:40...' ''°',t , ',:':7':,%::r,:.,,,,,.., ,, „,...:.. :‘,..,.„...A .: :, ,._,.1 , . 1 r 4. �` . ' '; �, ' u � e x ". � r A s s. z z 4 ° ^9. a^ ,d s; �a oa ' .a f,...:‘, re . ..1: ,., ... „,f,„.,"$1.!!„..4A).f ,-.,....•,i.;•;....,..„•,.;•.;..f.:...f..•„?..:':•••,,,,,,„,,.,4:::,E.,0,0itti.iog.!,!°A11,.. ;.......,:: ,,.!f,,s,.. .......1.,....4f: ,:,,,,•-, ,,,...:,,,,.,,,,:: filis,,3',„,..,1,,:',:ita,,... ..;:'''' '.4„'"!4:„L...i.. ;. 4Y� ^ 4...• _. ;bid t ', 1. 44_ , , 410,,,i .. - , ,-,.._,„..-,, , ,i,,,-.1,,,,, ot,.",.... 414 iG u ,, y 1. 1. lo g. NI a . ( 7 `s `4 it « i r tx .- qg id i is . I�gt' j9 ,., q�+ ;� a .' it } .. , ..1' s " , ..,: I Jr n� , .' s �'4 3�,.1.1.1 7 43 - Gn a� T x ‘ t �, ' , w iv py, yy . it'.*:,,.4,',., �4��! !i F� )4 , mom . a w x , Y ems- { , $$ . } C >;fi ' k '� et a3 IA iltitt s. y A. 1Rt a ram.� �.'� _+ if 1 # 5. .".i f`rL' `ii ' .,,,,,,10111tk 441/01. kit � y .ram j qA 11''''Lltl'lli:I'''''''''t''.1 -: to ,, xk �qe �` f �P � . � ` }' "a .,•.:.:„,„,..s,,i.,,,,i..., .........-:1. .," ,..,,, .. ,. :,..,,,.,,,.:„ 1,4J., , 4,i .,.-„,,t,,,,, 74.•••- „. . ...„.„ .• .,,,- :.,,,,c-, , .„,,;:.',.. 141,„„'„,„F ...•,,:,.ili, , tit„;.,i,-.4 #` d '9 .;x .t ,.' $g k • '� - 6 sb y !. 4 Y y� g E t�,pp n' _ a. ,� 4O f ,. . t' s ,tea °e. `. + - a € � .. x .'»,, ,r' - ::� "`� Y ',, ,sue is 3: 'k , R+ .` ',�° ` �` il • lf ,�d°� • '� - ? T Y k aC.P ,` ¢fi g .g .4 3.� $.'P §m. : F' a� ,.f"' H l 4.€ .d's 4 .... • iir Ai` '''• '• - •T. -' ;',.-t.,-;,:t".°'-: *4],,,, :„,...•.„: ' , lice,,:;„, , , P $ , 1a I i • • .N ,gag. k ` .IT'S. t $ - bps �' 4MOVI" n ' �G@gq' pry .H.� $ x .ie R A jf, pro�s 5 :. fix; ��T��gg rw +'�'q '�c'.re, �''"'"'' Y'-i`s:a'"!..#.-{ � a x q A. • a � h 4 • \:,'... ' it •\,,, , , i +< k$ .s" E.f @ i d g it \\ ': yf t. W R ;:z:. 44„,),,,...'' A Of / � ��� .. 2 & s 5 t 4 t i o Nam . . x, b . is n Y W y�7.i. 'r::.__ y ' foe 4-11.„-ii,jilit;-.30'''''''' . .::...' 040. : g 4, T itr'' - • ,'••• —.,•:.',,,,,,,,, '...,....1.;',:-...:..'..-. ----..-- ''''''-''-''''''' a ly . '..., ..„.„:i- t- e .. IPP v A : t ,, ,t ,,:, .i...: ...;,,,, ,,,,,..,,, mow, - g 3 k �gg ' ii 5 ., *fir.,, r 11 , '6,` ,ti,''' i .0,, •`. 11, .... ,:•,..,,,,,„„ . „..:„.,• •'h . 4 . t.. _.... i.„.,...,, ,, ., 1. .... „. ., ..,....,. .,...,:,..:„ ,„.„, "..,:,::::„„ . .L :,. ''''''...„:, -.:. 1.1'.".-' 4r,' ' ''' ''.4 1°' ' *-'4, R r 4 1 .,ems' • • w, a• ,� %mob -Er‘, ° w. a • 8z- 1.4 Ada' RF' x v aa- cam' •, sa4t ft . 4 it-',,,,, 65lii tM mow, ' & p [ij ' e' 33 3 fi E• ... d4 riQq-- $ t - b k' , s �% �?� �,. 4 g `a sad .» Nn a 47 N R .,:.,.,,e4.", „, . ...„ . , ,,,\-,\ ;.: do �� . f �e4 � � : 4 ... .ar'�'�..., ,.,�...ry.,,., .E. ..,. - - _ ':-�x ^";:•r+e µ4 '�`,a <<„r;°za. - - x. _ ,,.ia"_-: s.- a-. Ve - 4 W e w .•- • id, k'b�i"�T;;,,� x' � a<l XY a#.s.5-..,�4y. "•r�'�- F=" ,�w✓P ° .xy' "+,:EC:`^ - .:'9 ..,::.�,; �::;ram•„' �s�3��� .�xs`c. � ^f 'p.. '�a»" tF :X� =e,� s, � :5 x • r, Auii4aire • �' .. ff :'-%.;'_ -5A,>z: -:� a' `fix,,,', ; ° nF �, ;:,.N'fir;.. _ ;�'r -� :=r ".�."<w:�e,�, F° "�ma.: :;�;,,tea,��r.� < " 'z_ .}> 'g,,,,„•- „;<`, - q,7,." ,x T,,. ?ilk.`: _ ,{ „r ,. e;� - ,":„'1.`.:-•,C+d-,N<;.7•N''R:3.yr':G. %".', '_�zi :'.•., .'^ k`rx `� (' .:�'h ,,,<.> .q..... �Y: • �P , R. ,,._ :> ., a °;ah '+c0..Y ;Xa .�w tiF ' "- , r' • .11110101/011.0100... ..40., vy,wye. ' '', w e +'' x „i': •„. - a1<' • ry,V''?, r. :,• :; d ". '<.. < a •.` • �"; ^., Y:''' {tt` `s „: . a ('it<r«.a, •ir..�`. -fi '` ,s y„4r;,Y ; -°t _i ;*n..a '�`' .Y ... ° �s .ze: -�:•., € i 4K . ,� ,.,.ir ' _ _` ; '"` t - ffiri- rA k%.... a�'� ': `,9k • Y�O,,N'Yc-'„F •'63s:Mtl 3`,?,p`5 ,. '�'<.'� ,•' .. v'" `r.:" 'J �T,.iµ.0 , , "''��..�d.b `jeik•+y',,3�A -... '"'r^r•`�„ 'xtz r..-:.rC q ,x:.0 -�, - p. j, -. .. ... ,.. • 5^ � � 5r°.a,-.et".,_,` b€, ,p .._ '"..,.. • ,r :r. '8....' his: ,:�. r. .." ..• . .'-1- fi ' _ •ii4y;;' • ±4 a,. ,,a x:^:' _ .,p= •,.„Y .ems' . a ..;pax„`, . —. ' n- _ A ^ ,. h.. C s ' .1' ,,,,,(1', C gik ; Pe t _. of, ik r. sr _, f-ter �. > .. b . ` •, -, .. ‘. ...„ tiii,.. ,.. ,,, ,,,,, '7 — .tt / \ Pt ilk :",. 0. i .�, • «� r ` 1 , ,-. li.... ... :,„.„ „ ,,,,. " ` � '. & : r „, ..„ .. _, :,.,...„..•..„ .....„ „.,. . .,,,: „4,''' ' • .. p P w. k- • �`f x �'iva - - . •fie" .*4. $,� >. a 2 C, r" y� a% z ;'``�- V. V Ott' a a- • '' � s;A 'ze a ' � ¥ � a ; � ", • t,. ,�:" e' ' a a • • - »- ..te - s c • f,. Ma „ - A - . , a'..'- s�� kik 01 4. ..., s„ t{ am 1#' * 'a�74:. ` »i' •,ter dk " .. •1',a, 4--- k '+r�i`ei k 5r 4 ~ , s q ice' «' 1.0" .. 44 • Ai+lri -"11 � j f e, a�1 }g. ., i -viL„ .,•, i,.. •.„. ,,, is*: ..„...--„,__;„. -'•itiAllit‘ .."'-' :"T.::-,,,:::„..„.0,91 , -` � : F ♦ €t:i F c-`-- - i i.. ki3: s i' ..of �. x a a t 017 ,,4414:' /, -.ss.,g,..,L.;-%''t' ' ' '''''r:. -C1::::::!,84441t,—.. '.'"ik,'•••it**,r4IW ...X.:4 %�.�.. .w �•$ x, .fit. # y ,,*�' 1,„„ • q « �'7' s �_�- ��.�.. �. k k�k , ' «�, �,. ` .�ali,At •>«yi~ 's % . #� ,per s:, a �,.1� 2� .,110111,1a.: '•=„„„... ..114V,. .„• - . • - ••• ---- •04%)* , ,: •• .,. ..,,.. . ... • . ,..,..,..,,,..„, :.,„ _,,,,, • • doir .. i'. 1"iIRi «' ""K° :*, ivst..+i,,♦•ilia '- ,:Y <.er`f • 4 ,.,!4•:°k.,•-_r.4:i-•A o- „ ..� f ' � ,o.a : i-. 'I-k .4 r, .werA ♦r xv § �, � i "" • A'_ :.q ; 4 . . kns� i te4,--�,,,' '• �A -z;.;„ aWw, .kw � .k y .R♦♦ ar* .. y, , .,4-,,,,,,,A,-,Am,-a� i`� r s,.a� •yF aY aY ,•, w .. I 'a • eq..- .410*`• 'et* ' •••I \ ,g •� .. ) }¢ as 4- `8A r. , wiki !N a. R a» 3dk3 2 :fro g9.. .. �"'0>- l', mi ,Jd 9x 'rn k • ". • r� �,• ''•"tea;�.;�_;a���:'4; "�• , iffi • • • ;fir, �,,. 3 �; z =.•':` �'s. .t;v:. rx . ?,,ce e',">" a:`� ;;f;- ',. ,,, "s` , _ ;:x - y shy.. r 1„' yi.' �'k'< r , ..�e < s z: .J zf;. �d =,ti.„� ns, .,•± ' «may , , ' y,�,.,,,; � m x .'am. ,�§ � '�. r-• ill .,; 4 a' V'$ 'MIFF a ° s ` '.�. : � , :wa,�t d 4 :," �^ , �,`-,�,'s L �.ter: 7 :� � ..,� , .r� +r�"�„.k ^MSNW Jh.` rY ,�'r .'.<. �, .r hsr'». ... ' s x t . '.y ' a;.A.n, > ': '"'' „�. ',,'•i a' ' teR aSy , r '1R .` 'N : . , g. .«y, Nar .t;. I: '. a � .r. ^p , , a",,` .' ` tx% =�'=Y"r`'"t- • ._ py{wJ° ,y-S�s4'2. .'4 'F e 'Yin $ F?F,'�a .yE ;• e:y,' °f `•"yyFe'c..�.•. ."§ f�~W z.. f. • ' ' •'''''' 1^, ,, n`', r'E T' eke, F • • • ^z. • qs .�� S c- _PF§ `" v. � ,,V,;, ��' _- 't4'a': •4. )",... tt � . � ..,, ,:�`y`::;s�,�aa°f&�S^�;,r`� �..z�.�•'�,<, n_ : ... S • 4v. , a �^r£� s e .< =I b - P -•3 - ':/x 'n>(e i. > _ i a•,'�s �„,,: ,rNl w' y _ i• i f t.'+' - _'L1 ,,F'vrr 3 . � �:>' � fi.,€ , , � � � c . � �>" '�i - _ �� , Y.Cn-;,,: , ;':,',' .,.1= ,.esc , "L;S. «i ' . ," 4 xae !.r•M,74' ,", ` £' i. 4' �� tPls"t�'.,,av ';, Y _ M „ 1 =t. . = '` r« :".-:i.�",a .` ��a, �- ,�ra�-: . :� �".^ �,• - .Y a'' $f'�., mot' 'f • g € $ L„M S `� . t�gy g2 . d+ • g • ham- - . . i.--„:, g i .. „.....„,..,..„:„... „-- '.. d ,, :. II + 1.4.,... / 4. , t.„,... „, .. gi,.--:-- --.--;r:-. .„„...„...:„:7 .-,-.-..'••'.-'-4„,°,„,...-.:. • '.....„1:',4:1,•. .„,.:.:•:---'- t•:% ••••„,„::!f:,°,7.. .'„°;-... P. 1 4,4:„4--°°,114° --, ...„, -• � '�, � - M • "• ".4 ` !,y A,a* 1 , -.�. �> ?{ " ,'.�-p -. -ti ,• • d aft .- „„"-_ • 4 Y :. " b / ;° `fie yy ^..,`,��R� :! _'ik W(.°y `A' } • 3% w, ffr ! : / r ,} „ %f- ��� ;rt i , a ;. t "::"—lit: p SSG`""�.o. dce;: :. . a 'Pr • ii 't' f.. d" .' " y S.�'s. .ems ffi 41414toti a • .......:•,'. ,. „...„:„... • .0,_,,,,,,...,,,,,,,..:,.,, '...•„„..,:,....0„.,..:0,,,,, ,i.:111":,,,, ..,,, , 3 .,.k,, Iif :;t 2" 1 q N Y ^' red r ...., P.'. ate+ 4 a dJ::„:. ' • !''''14) viih.„ 4rt ''''I: ''":' ::4%*'' ''.' '''''1"..::::''.',1.-1-"*.-.'';';:Z-7'4?;•\l'11;11fi-4,-,,,,,,'C'''' ''',Ii;H;32,1*"it-.4iE.,'!.:;::.:.:.•'•::•:—..:,,...-.'''.1.5.;,.•,?. r' :likii;:,,•;!:14E;:,.., ,.f:;:iiiz,i-i-,,,- •.. ,,:,-,,,,,,,, • - , m �.�� y .t 'error E .;. ':d. .. '.. . $ e " ^ms �.. • ,,eye+. 88��. ,.t. .b,,. x '� $ w • ' ''! 4: ''''''..'„::it.'11'..r, y VI p: gg rt Y ' ?: ;a•qw• „OFF, :. . .,, ..,. , , ",'-;,.NIZ„ WIN =At . , ' I '4, ,,,i, ,- -,' . 'r,',''''-'1.! '.,:i .44it'';'„i!rsiit,-1(-- ' , = 7 ' :i ,d- . , '4 -P..' ''' 8 4 ' * -tfLa..;.;:i ,,..-.. .,,,,i, ,, , ,,,,_ t.,-,7°. s ',„0,‘ , 4ts- ks ' ...:.,‘ , . i,, ' - ,, . : . 4 ' ' " ' ''' S, IL.,:,:th,- --,.........7' '44;11,1.11,1144 2: ":",-,,„f . - 4-"-, - t - 1 tz..,,,N, 7 .... 4' , , 4 4 ' , ''.W.,, , , iti fr r�� { �..„.x` ,� Rg �;� {, �k.°. � 4 gi (4',� �• ' i 'r x' T�-' A. s .400150i $ , , ": +*:- .'',' ,L.-,k,‘, i,,,:',,,,?,,,,t',,,,,,„' -:,,,,:l,!'''' %;T:',:'1,.,4‘.'::::‘,..., ,, ..,. , ,, 4*.4%i j:kti ,, ' ' ' ' ,,..,,,,,,,, , , ,, s ' \ '\ ''''' itt7e:4,.;, • '.vi L''''','*\, Ns!"4.1.4 it 1( , :;e,t, 410i,.. . 44', 4-, 4'1=14!'=1 41. 1 .1,.$ '"�1Xx�s' � t 'YOB �y' S� ,.a e -}X ya $ � h4 x� �{r! ➢e$ �� i. h W '1l a [a .f 3W Ri � o '4.$. 5'y° $t ° 41 ,...tVilrtiiii-01` ' ,C0.« .\' 1 --, ' - '..,, ,,,,.,,,- 4,i',,,i,,,?‘;',,,,,,, "- 7';, : ,,7 tor ,''7 .", , of 4,‘444,, ',.,k4,,,,, i'-'11fieV,1,4 '' " tit .',-''''.0 '', 1' '`O' I''' ', * ''''' 4 / ;,;*; 4;0;4 :::- .414:.;4...:::-,i.*;„,, -,8:41‘4,.:*.11 ,,,,ti,j;:117,7'4:, :i:1:4.11."',A4t04;,%,,t-:Wit,,,,,,%,,i1:s4,c. ,i,,,?I'li,-tt:;-.#;!=v,a. _1#7"4.!' ,.:•k. :, : ',i.,,,„,:, ,t., '',3..,:4'1 4 r *'.,:tt.‘qti 1' i'4 'qY,,,:01, ' ', ;484,".,71. : ,:;:%':";i"''e7eUe'.!P44t1.4 ticioti: '4';':' '''-'11' , #: ' 'it, . ,,,,; , „, ,7„., ; , „, ,.,„„ , ,,,,„! „1, , ,„,„. 4.,..„, ;,...,,, 4617.,... !..,,,,r.„,_ ;,4141,','it; n T4L,. ° , %," '',' ; ,"i ' *71,7r;°::!t et '',..fiV ° -so- '' .$ a.1 #� ,s. { �y.�' a , ‘ i Le,„4-,. 1... ,,,,...-, "7.,"4,0 g4 g IDF € L ' 'yam}t �,t e �lJ�JX§§�,�, �yX q ° q ��"° � { �; °� .f� § tl ritX: n #�"� "�Sy� `�x'� '`'°x°F" p¢p�' p� T e c/o.. ' fit, a �. L- I * , ' , :)bs ' �+ )- y a' i ks #9 ° 5 S # ' & j VS " .. ai�°1 d _ 4Y ? �� as ° .1 1 vim&' F` &y, , w� a s�. a ,�, r T ,'' qlel 5 elf ''' ,. air , n w 3 p ..'- ;-.4,.. " ,...,,,,i,,,,; -\ ---NLt, '14 , -'',.,,‘,,f(S, --. t.0;47,1 ‘,,, ' V''-0'2'",' . ,, .. r ., i . -' ,!: ''40.1r4, '-, "-ik.,- '`, ., , t%.,,,,,,,„ . lit .. . ,.. .te' , , , i- r% w�� ? p, �' 4 4� -$~FN. - y oe isb, t ..+ / ilk, Now, .. a r .. , . . , , . . .. ,k 4,,, ,, ,, . . .,.. *, 4600, ,, t....„ A A / S $ r E' '.?,, ,, 7 ft. ti .Wry u� { t .. .. a �- _ '..r.' , :- " ,,,i -71"- - # ''''' e'4140), _ s- - .#----4,-z-: ' -,. , . >,---,-.1f..4-,-- e 4 f •3s y�p � ail ili ' ' )it aimp �. „,� Pg" r k :° sa. ' ..... y"qr aw¢ ,:, - a. '+$=.tea k " "`, �: tea. :,a PJS�`-F.::- '� � e .,,k a dy°`t �° '6a . ar s • d" r „ _ .,. `% �.:. '- r,* _ A � a y w ' • . ,.k, c "lt- � : . yam` "«�m< - #� ,fit, a' ... a;� • y�• a` P :I e.: <^ yy � . �. :,.1.. fit: y g - m3 , „�^ > �, obi.: r,n, '`yu,� yv� `y _ �': a ,�i• P>. Y {� T3 ;r,f.x_ � .2::,. v1�;S Lf ; :8. k< . � y 4., , .t ` Y . ;:tir , r , Fr Yti, ,oJ. ,Y1 < +t`"t c Q :x �L,:.V . M(9� . r Hy :Fk. r.„,,,,,,,,,,,,> .. g nV' Y �Yst �e Y �?,%r`'� ) fp . ^� p, Y � s N, x „r n .. : .,., .: '3 •• � x.' .; .hr �,� �� .�: . y,,_.,.�:,.i ,� vi• . 1 Y";.:: „ �l„. .i �iv AY' .�' t� b + „ e:r<f`sm' , .P'. (f..17i4t;4:,„, 5i ;9y7 k 1prz A^Wc a, ry r "- " „> w; S , «c ' 'f tiS. l Mr• E' 1w : ,k e „ s fP. Pfl"4x1 • " i�:r."'• a f°,v ';:z • ' ' • +ri >'a "" te�: 2 - ?• � 4 : h.•' F .. ::7so- :, .•s„yfzyr •.« '�' F:S e;.r„ �3 "�; s r,t ; a ,.�"" ; a,i; . » s7. r ^ t o;� sai" d • e N� < �:t ,ram .f.s ia�,< x �` 1x' v Nitillit K ,,,,, . 01A,,, ' ... •••••• •,... . ,, >:::�r.:�.•, ,.-,w,m;x,.,:: s`�:'a'F.:.�;r.�:,�'::'^ xa. g•<: ..,. ap.,�::�``:-.� �'` ""_-. awa crz-. �re '� `^ am:Yp�.. # � ' f=� o E.� fi jR % 1 ' t ti' ,., 1 .S('' ,, '''''' V* ' R iiiiiiiiii + 01* • y,,;, �vuAr •... ,. fig.. S'( ' „0. y ,,�a I? '°::.:;•', •• ,.-•44.! •10:1Z6,2,7*:::4,4•704c4,:n.;„...:„.../ .1600sr 'T,,,,•?-lr,g--4:ipit4,•..4i-‘071!•:,••44,-*Zig*:"11,,,eWMFI''''.44ii,, j'''''- ::-''''''''' 7 . ----""41.11111_,..:* "„ :, ' ' -: ' ' '''' ' .L I gti, ,, am" : t .. .'7,1%,,,, - .,„ , - l';,_1,1':::',i''''1:'''-'','*l':'---1:' %#,It41)441, Allii. . .--...;-:---.:..*-- -1.:•:‘.3-..,..: • .ram w"x'",`s '. # " me '"" `t..... , • a4� .* Allf Y .: .. • a l ''� ;. �Via aw O 1 ;; r ma' 9 ear r „a ': } :: u �f�1 .t 1 F .0 br4 $Vi z« .C v $4; 4.1 "' P _,err# t f t i ®• ssc g 3.. i q;� tE: ..3 ,'3 r_ .: 6Y I AI q,. E 7 ; ^. rENt t z i e �' 11441 0. xx f$, 7. ,f �o p ya e ,„ $ _ d p r y J r . _, a gi py� ' y :.t" - na: ems" ` , tom " t �� =1 L r rt i, x' P w S f qj ev [r l'ilfC ' t �h tl '^sa • � a j r ° f• F+' t 41 t 44 ,* f b a# 4 W.,. ,_,' 4 1 • ik. , `Y a .e sx` 4 xy � - y w a a ' t B 'A*" a 4- ' '• 4. �. " : n. 3`A • ,, 4 p 4 a `W- x ' R^. ,`" .y "W • ^+ b. z 5 � a `i. _m # s . erg. B '1' # r 44>4 M 4 a - 3b 5B 1 .9. , S a( $ .a*, :� 4 � � `�SEYS, _w T �fr�` It 4 ,'.4, li,, '%;,:ii,!,..;"Ii . AO 4" 4 " y C • ; 9� • ( ., s • !'' s4 : ...-- i • iii4N :g•il it ....,i. • at g A I '''' ..:... ltr rotcx.; 34 the ' 1 a °; k t • -y`$ k ,,,,,4_:;!-7-,r.,,,,, .':. , „:„,:,?...::::04-1: 0 i;i0if Y •K n s � i i . • wa x„^, syf ;w3 -,.r,r ,,x,,a,,'y^r rx, ',ir„ r V->• >< ^. ' ,br -a a' � �� Fr ,vra a`5'd' <v'T2,ex ,,. `�. `x.._mom:,� ,. ,..�pN ;.:' .»,y's,..,i-. Jr ,.. ^^ <,:- ��K k,%�."%:a` :•'�¢",`... ws ",z, �r " '? a h�` _ vim',S a,,o'gr,"�iE"'� 5<r<' .ta, :..�5, a',_ xr y�,4 '�,z - ^'t Y.'�a� °= •• a ...,;;';_�"<., "y.?,,.,,, ' tr a�-,"3„;:..a„-,fit.'. «!�?„sue<.y,' .,4 ? 3`YreP.:, 3`, v.a° ;I a_R. .tx,"4--,I"`R' '',?,y' e a'' +Kr:,.-. Ffy, ""a:;h'�v`".- 2= • +'o.tl g�.`^z'„e^d, r, F�.S ; ...3� ;_;:":]k.,,^., erg»< `a'S,-:..'-;'„�"w , gs "" < °tJ,tY'f" .., YE',.Y,'< '? ', r«3"� 3::c S?? - - .. - ^. -'"'<" Ems,, , �: ^'3,a.p S 't''&,^kI'.N .YAv,. „o-, ,fi-,',.-fiu :. -' .. '� :....-. yam.. S' 4 i zf .. P 'izx�i _ g, '•L^,,,C r _ w� .r:,q-:" .te` 'mow' .r+c'3�'„ ,,=,'F,c, a,�, ,ice" 'h qq ..K_t, S, " aka "k<ac 's�,z".�; `^s'�"ram-: xk X. ter. 'sF :' l, v,k+ , 3 to ;� a",r`,-� `z.. "t," rk '<y`;^'.'�<:* L»�;xa,", 't .'`�. r a,'> r✓ „ " h,<.x'>c,, ,x,°n':w^ r-•a '' -,',A. 'z;�`.' - `` > .;';>,<as,',,�.�,^ «a�ao;h.�, ..,s,�o" f<' ;'=5: >,:�;`,yx;z. e;;';- ,t n',"°,%TM:-'x 4 x,, ;r' -, ^<, ,';Ao; r, %'y� .� a `�,d, , "; %.'>.~- ;sir":, ,roc, .`` ',,,>',"�,>>Y. '«. .-„ :; a rr i ,aye„';s, r ''` 's, -/; ,t"' T- A. '-:sue '"` ii's y. ''i ha' ES �,� .fix,. ,k-ax'-„ fd %Is.<ay- 4K, In h.>r i.`, _ '=:.3--°-�-'� at) j ^.£e�=SFr", a � 3, ,,,x ter= i"x'wv `x. r<" mow ��� � ram„ z^ ;,, >x. 3"- r 5m �Ii u-::'� Iàij ` 'T IL .Kew ;fix , .: s,..zza ,?-.3' ,.. xnv," �� � yyz 9e "� sev, rb'- a -� yW.i`'., '>' "tea .,,,F. "��' ^:emu- h ., >',';, � £^ ' -- , .`, ,.i J R++„''., tH...An o,JB y r a,ry,� ^E'H„ Twk""a�. v:,�'S>i�''„S`e�i-�`",J`Y`=. "w > •� ry r'f4 S? ,31.., .1c a,.R„',S''`! t` „'C 4" -2 r. ,yyrr Y ^:, ', 'Aa'=r,-r,,r- < ", • }'� 4 v ;.r�'�,},>;,&.:-> �F.sr, �* fC'F,,,Sws h: ".,J a" ","�,r' <a :(,sz,n,. a z, av 5k„,� � cr=;� an�y 5.'zj�'_ s.zx,f /F. ,K,"C,y. %�2,-a _ $rE gam, ..;>."�T*.' .",.":;.^"�'-';'.><>r>,"" ,F ` , i,,,�', w y, 'f:`a „"",_„ 's,,, ,K• a.<>�,. "�r;.."':,'�;ra`z o„ ,,3:h ,; a=,3}�,=•;.,,,,,,u-x;. >,', .;.ti s „m., -:` .-A -' `" r ; u�,;: .fin. ' -- o`�;� `:. `his- . - °?">>}.,3��.. - - -, ,�ts2." <a - 1. - -114 ,,',<�. .;x;� :'` j<-%M.1i'�&.f z� ,i ""`-"L,., w�,s,. - a ' .,. , �', '." % , s ; 'k ,:, w4 , "ry,'a`.,„%"sk°" .<,3> 4,��w,E,jr ffi`Ya 'lei 3"..,: •.�,• a ` < I<% ��y#,^- 324„S,l" 'YA- vz„f yy_J^ " -'�,-Fk r , - "w'�,`,x -,c'�, v `r.',', ‘.`�','�'r<3 w.Ww - 'F'nK^ , ,. ` y' c:c,,,�`Z� ' t',.�3,6 ''P,'^ur '�:`: .., , ` �, .E a) - ,.e ,ss,+x,,"„' .. ,» fir,T,m fi ,,,„, `•. �• � ` 'Ili x, :' �,sz I- �" ,•,� a ,,,,_ .,,, - '.�„,�'q ''if"" - ` � , - \„ ' `i+' _�.y �*ma`s, 4 Y F`. .o ' m r ;_; s �^`` s re`.ge E 'k rxy - y ,� c"Yc. 'zti.x ^,.t` p� r° r4 ;' + L ✓• y ea9. .��><. -.;a. y, 1' x :rt, yr , 4,, i t, , g „9 r; at: fib. ,. • .r 'g S 4 , F ''� S km :gym H s w gyp.. & jA ' ° .,,,,::::v.,1,....,,,,,, ., ,,,,,. ,- -7,,,,,,,,;74-,:::,,,:::.. ° p .-�. a ;'.''''''''' ''''..: • • m ` ^ :'.'.....,..:-1:. N1/4,%. IV- . . ti ,. max, L. T yy , .,......„.7,:: ,___.i. N......., -� "' off. A - laFtt4... Y`t d \ R', . I t.+s i . � 't ._a k ,. A• s fi R% g;� �. t . • •0111111111H„Agg A - .. a p �.' °` u, 3, *ua.a �,�y ;{, pl°• �q.e .in'. ^!AF!t' ^'mot 1 x ffi pep ...6' r 44. ' o. ;.:< • • • ? ° . :•Aliv.H. .. .. 1.],tl]. . 1.,,,v, . , ./:.. .:•.:11;.::',!..•;!••,!.. ''...;;„,•,;•„,e,AT.7- i •:••. .,.;.:4`'''.-;.: I 0. ;„, •:','" - '°....,:, „:„.,:, „:„:„ . ,._. . . :,,. . .. :02'. ....1 „ ,'''''', •.-..1 ....410' - • .--0":::`• 't 4.: 2• . : •• •,. 'L'-.'. , ‘. ',. •:,. '''.. ..'•,•':. f i • V ?; > •• , ,:.,', i \ . 1 ? 1i. IV ! , •- ' .is y a From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Opposition to the proposed Symphony of Lights installation at Central Park East Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:22:57 AM From:Susan Barnhill <slbhill@verizon.net> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 9:40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Opposition to the proposed Symphony of Lights installation at Central Park East Some people who received this message don't often get email from slbhillCa�verizon,net.I earn why this is important Dear Huntington Beach City Council Members, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed Symphony of Lights installation at Central Park East. Our park is widely renowned for its unique bird habitats and hundreds of bird species, both migratory and year round. Of concern is that the proposed light show will significantly disturb their environs, possibly putting endangered migratory birds at risk. In addition, such activity would disrupt the populations of various animals that call Central Park home. Where will those displaced animals go? Our citizens currently enjoy the walking paths and green space in the proposed area, and restricting their access is wrong. The negative impact of nightly crowds for years on end is unacceptable. We deserve better. "The wildlife and its habitat cannot speak, so we must and we will." Teddy Roosevelt Please reconsider and vote NO on this controversial project. Sincerely, Susan Barnhill From: , Levin.Shannon To:. " suoalementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: . FW:Please register my voice Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:23:01AM - From:Allie Plum<skyedawg007@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 9:43 PM To CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:.Please register my voice Dear CC and Staff' I wish to once again express my disapproval for the overpriced MAGA library, plaque. It `. displays a tiny;ode(books)to the actual library and a big eagle, a In God we trust, and, some other furled drapes which:seem more apt on money. Back to the drawing:board for less.please: : I armalso'against The Symphony of Flowers in'.Central Park taking away a large part of the. public park and possibly disrupting the local wildlife.This is,too:long in time and too invasive Also-the petitions which were signed clearly for the HB Public Library to go back to no: interference by a "Board"appointed by the far right City Council There is no balance or representation for the other half of HB. Please put it to the vota of the people. Thank you:for having an open mind and collalorating:to make the community included::' Sincerely,. ; Allison E. Plum 19251 Brookhurst St HB From: Levin,Shannon To: suoolementalcommPsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW: NO on Item 24(Symphony of Lights) Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:23:07 AM From: MARILYN Boehm<beachmama7@msn.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 10:22 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: NO on Item 24(Symphony of Lights) Some people who received this message don't often get email from beachmama7@imsn.com..Learn why this is important Once again, this Council is coming up with a plan to raise money for the city by having a "light show" in our beautiful Central Park. This horrible idea will do unknown damage to the wildlife that live in the park. The noise, light, and crowds are disregarding what the park is all about to those of us who enjoy its beauty and tranquility. Has anyone researched the effect this show will have on the environment? Have any of you even enjoyed a day at the park? NO on the Symphony of Lights. Marilyn Boehm, resident of HB, From: Levin:Shannon To: 5uoolementalcomm aC�surfcity-hb.orq _ Subject: FW:city council meeting Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:23:21 AM From:Amanda Furches<amandafurches@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, February 17, 2025 11:00.PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:city council meeting Some people who received this message don't often get email from amandafurchesc gmail.corrl:Learn why this is important Please vote no.on the light show • Despite what seems to have come back from the environmental impact report....There is no way it will have no effect: There are nearly zero completely dark places in our urban environment and our parks are the only places left that even come close. birds look to the stars to navigate: Light pollution disrupts'.animals circadian rhythms, breeding, navigation .etc. BLeachers are,down right HIDEOUS:. Any quaintness appeal of the,light show is immediately killed by.bleachers.. Any light show I've been toin Europ e, peoplejust sit on blankets and bring their own,chairs"and picnic,'. Elderly people can't easily climb up-bleachers nor can people with disabilities.. The proposed 150,000'/year is a joke. People'are not going to go to this more than 1 x • - Also,vote no on the maga sign. , The MAGA sign is a blatant political power move and CORRUPT waste of our taxpayer money when we are in a deficit. Absolutely not.You will be voted out with such,obvious corruption like this Amanda Herring; " From: Levin,Shannon To: suoalementalcommAsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:23:27 AM From:Steve Farnsworth<hazmn54@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 11:27 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers Mayor and City Council Members, • I urge you to vote NO on the Symphony of Flowers in Central Park.There has to be another location. Bringing in$200,000 in revenue (maybe)to the City is nothing , compared to the number of citizens that will be upset knowing this will do damage to the park. Thank you, Steve Farnsworth Huntington Beach City Council Meeting comments on.Agenda for 2/18/2025 Mayor and City Councilmembers: APPROVE: Item 19,—We recommend you approve of the City of FIB proceeding with the Staff recommendation on Actions A and B,though we're puzzled that this represents accepting funding from CalPFA,a political subdivision of the State of California,via bonds,to subsidize.HD housing,albeit for Seniors,.Wondering, how the CC(specifically McKeon) rationalizes that with HB suing the State over mandating precisely . what this seems to be.. - Item 22—'Selection and Use of Library Materials'-We recommend you approve,of'the City of HB proceeding with the Staff recommendation on Actions A and B,or C.We don't approve of proceeding with Part D,as that would cost the City too much to pay for.a Special Election when it could be held at a fraction of the cost in the scheduled 2026 General Election. Item 23-'PublicOperation of Library Services'-We recommend you approve of the City of HB proceeding with the Staff recommendation on Actions A and B,or C.We don't approve of proceeding: with.Part D,as that would cost the City too much to pay for a Special Election when it could be held at a fraction of the cost in the scheduled 2026 General Election.: Item.20—Deny or postpone the approval of the.'Design of the Plaque Celebrating the Huntington Beach Public Library's 50th Anniversary as Recommended by the Community&Library,Services Commission'. Under no circumstances should the design of this plaque reflect the letters MAGA in any configuration or composition that groups the letters together,or are emphasized in any other way.It is " very clearly a biased political acronym that is universally recognized throughout the USA.;It does not. belong on this,or any other plaque,placed at any property considered to be Public or City property,: Item 24—Deny,or postpone the execution of a License Agreement,Between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment,LLC,for the management and operation of Symphony of Flowers at Huntington.Central Park East,as well as the Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report(FMEIR)for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park,City of Huntington.Beach, California,until one or more public forums can be scheduled by,the City Council,Symphony of Flowers 'authorized'representatives and other City Officials to garner wider public comments and questions. At this juncture in time,there are still far too many questions and issues needing better definition and explanation to enter into any legal Agreement between parties.As the tentative date proposed to commence the opening of the shows isn't until September of 2025,we have adequate time torallow. for one or more public forums to occur to'more thoroughly address residents'concerns • Sincerely, Larry and.Susan Slonim,. (714)357-9600 From: - Levin.Shannon To: SuoalementalcommC)surfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:Light Show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:23:38 AM From: Kathy Dowling<kathyldowling@msn.com> Sent: Monday,,February 17, 2025 11:59 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show Some people who received this message don't often get email from kathyldowling( rmsn,com.Learn why this is important _ -This Light Show is a bad idea for all of us and the creatures that reside there. _ Please vote NO on this destructive and inane idea that will cause,us to lose our Park for 6, months of the year! _ Stop this now! James and Katherine Dowling 7582 Appleby Drive Huntington Beach CA 92648: • • From: • Levin.Shannon To: 5upplementalcomm(alsurfcity-hb,orq Subject: FW:Light show in hcp Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:23:58 AM From:Jan W<jdi4interest@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 4:41 AM . To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light show in hcp • Some people who received this message don't often get email from jdi4interest(a�gmail.com.Learn why this is important I reject the idea of a light show in Huntington Central Park. I'm a very active park visitor and regularly visit the broad open spaces for birding, exercise and spiritual connection. • The proposed location is one a few remaining open, grassy spaces.We need that open space. _ The hundreds of species of breeding and seasonally migrating birds that make HCP their home need the open space and unaltered tree access that will be critically diminished by this - disruptive venture. • Aka: I completely reject the idea of having the light show of any type or structures involved in Huntington, Central Park or any other park in Huntington Beach. We are trying to put money before everything and that is wrong to do. Cordially, Jan Pehoviack 7282 Yellowtail Dr.,Unit 103 _ Huntington Beach, California jdi4interest@gmail.com 562-453/8456 From: Levin.Shannon To: suoplementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.orq Subject: FW:HCP light show Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:24:03 AM From: Pehoviack Richard<bruin70@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 4:47 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: HCP light show Some people who received this message don't often get email from bruin70C@gmail.com. Learn why this is important reject the idea of a light show in Huntington Central Park. I'm a very active _ park visitor and regularly visit the broad open spaces for birding, exercise and spiritual connection: The proposed location is one a few remaining open, grassy spaces. We need that open space. The hundreds of species of breeding and seasonally migrating birds that make HCP their home need the open space and unaltered tree access that will be critically diminished by this disruptive venture. Aka: I completely reject the idea of having the light show of any type or structures involved in Huntington, Central Park or any other park in Huntington Beach. We are trying to put money before everything and that is wrong to do. Cordially, Richard Pehoviack 7282 Yellowtail.Dr.,Unit 103 Huntington Beach, California twobruins@socal.rr.corn. 7143177644 Sent from my iPhone From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommCalsurfcity-hb.or4 Subject: RN:Citizen against Symphony of Flowers in Central Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:24:25 AM Original Message From:Patricia King<jkpkkkmk@verizon.net> Sent:Tuesday,February 18,2025 6:58 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Citizen against Symphony of Flowers in Central Park [Some people who received this message don't often get email from jkpkkkmk@verizon.net.Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentificatiort] For 35 years I have been walking in HB Central Park. Do not allow Symphony of Flowers in our Public Park,thereby removing our access to this property. Patricia King,citizen of HB From: Levin.Shannon To: suoolementalcommOsurfcity-hb.orq - Subject: FW:Strong feelings against the Synphony of Flowers attn:HB City council Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:24:39 AM • From:johnkinghb@verizon.net<johnkinghb@verizon.net> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 7:06 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Strong feelings against the Synphony of Flowers attn: HB City council Some people who received this message don't often get email from'johnkinghld( verizon.net•J earn why this is important Dear City Council Members, I have lived in Huntington Beach for 34 years, and want to express my serious concerns about the potential impact of the "Symphony of Flowers" event on the ecological health of Huntington Central Park East. Based on our extensive. knowledge and experience, gained through years of collaboration with City park . employees, we believe this event poses significant risks to the park's valuable trees, shrubs, plants, and grass. Specifically, I am concerned about the following:. • Irrigation Disruption: o The event will necessitate the shut-off of the irrigation system for several days prior to setup and throughout its 8 month duration. o This prolonged dry period, coupled with our region's arid climate, will severely stress the park's vegetation and the grass and all trees will die • Potential for Irrigation System Damage:: o The age and potential fragility of the underground irrigation lines raise concerns:about leaks'and bursts upon system reactivation, similar to the issues encountered with.the Central Library fountain pipes: • Impact of Heavy Equipment:. _ o° The use of heavy equipment for event setup and teardown will inevitably cause significant stress and potential damage to the park's delicate root systems. • Long-Term Sustainability: o Given the anticipated eight-month duration of each "Symphony of Flowers" session, the cumulative impact on the park's vegetation could be severe, potentially leading to significant tree mortality and long-term ecological damage. Huntington Central Park is a vital asset to our city, providing invaluable ecosystem services and enhancing the quality, of life for our residents. I believe it is crucial to prioritize the protection of this valuable green space. Therefore, I urge the City Council to reconsider the current location for the "Symphony of Flowers" event and explore alternative venues that will minimize the ecological impact on our treasured parks. Sincerely, John . John King. johnkinghb@verizon.net •lY From: Paula Schaefer To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CM0 STAFF);suoolementalcommesurfcity-hb.orq Subject: NO Light Show;Vote NO on#24(25-017) Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:27:01 AM • City Council Members: I am concerned that, as proposed,this License Agreement violates Measure C.If you carefully read Measure C,you will see that the following are prohibited "No golf course, driving range, road,building over three thousand square feet in floor area nor structure costing more than $161,000.00 may be built on or in any park or beach... " The EIR Addendum's Project Characteristics describes the "structures"that would be set up or installed at the Event Premises. The Project Description states that the water fountain/basin is. 9,000 sgft,the bleacher area is 20,000 sgft. Further, without the necessary cost estimates, it cannot be ruled out that installing the fencing,the bleachers,the concession stands, and a water fountain/basin would exceed the prohibited cost as stated in Measure C,which is $161,000, or in 2025 dollars, approximately$230,000. It is difficult to imagine that bleachers to hold— 900 to 2000 people multiple times per day, and being in place for—nearly half a year,would cost less than $230,000. Simply calling the following structures as "temporary": the fencing,the bleachers,the concession stands, and the water fountain/basin does not result in compliance with Measure C. Further,without the conceptual cost estimate and the special event permit information-which should have been included in,the City Council's staff report-I believe this is a very premature effort at getting this event scheduled for the City. One would think that since the City approached Symphony, an awareness of the requirements to comply with Measure C would have been met by now, since this is the second time this item has come before the City Council. Stop trying to force this event on the City; it is not wanted and it will likely cause more harm than the potential cash it will bring to the City. Paula A. Schaefer From: Ann Palmer To: suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq;CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF) Subject: Agenda Item 24:25-017 Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:36:08 AM Re: Symphonie des Fleurs/ Symphony of Flowers All: This event,that may be a unique, aesthetically brilliant experience could possibly generate much needed revenue for our city. Many concerns have been raised from parking to park damage to inaccessible parking amenities. We have little open space left in suburbia so our Central Park is supposedly the antidote for ever-more-crowded neighborhoods.Arguably, our beaches, our wetlands and Central Park are the treasures of Huntington Beach and provide (near) natural spaces that few cities have. Residents and visitors are able to access areas that are not fraught with crowds, clutter and frenetic activity. So of course there are concerns about decommissioning open space to allow commercial endeavor. I appreciate that some studying was done concerning impact to wildlife and the environment and hope that the issue of nocturnal disruptsbce was further addressed. Recently, however, a new development has occurred. Central Park seems to have attracted a second bald eagle! It would seem that this indicates that there is not just an eagle that visits but a pair that resides in the park(?). If this is the case I believe we need designated experts to assess how nightly events would affect the eagles' habitat. While the initial report stated that no endangered or of-concern species would be affected,the bald eagles' presence either had not yet occurred or was overlooked. . Please require a reassessment and impact report contingent on approving the project. Thank you. Ann Palmer HB 92648 • From: Mary Ann Celinder To: CITY COUNCIL,(INCL..CMO STAFF);suoolementalcomm4surfcity-hb.orq Subject: Use of Central Park Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:39:28 AM A public park is meant for the public, not for a private company to restrict use and damage the grounds.A public park is not meant for profit. I strongly object to light show that has been proposed. Mary Ann Celinder . Celinder's Glass Design 21341 Fleet Lane Huntington Beach Ca 92646 studio 714 962 8361 ce11 714 504 8361 www.custom leadedglass.com From: Tamara Colby To: CITY COUNCIL,(INCL.CMO STAFFI;suoolementalcomm(asurfcity-hb.orq Subject: Symphony of Flowers:Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report,Symphony of Flowers Date: Tuesday,February 18,2025 8:46:19 AM Some people who received this message don t often get email from tmara colby@gmail Corm Learn why th,c Important Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: ( This letter is regarding a 6.3-acre project called Symphony of Flowers, a light show proposed to be located in the north east portion of H.B. Central Park. Find a new location, please l 11111 l l I am OVSD graduate, a Marina Graduate, and have masters in Urban planning from UCLA... My professional opinion is this project has big legal, environmental and financial issues!!! That aside the thought of it ever getting this far is shocking and disturbing! Something stinks of secret back room dealings once again in HB! I The Addendum to the Final Master Environmental Impact Report (FMEIR) for Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park, City of Huntington Beach, California -Symphony of Flowers, Project (Certified 1999 FMEIR 1999) (State Clearinghouse No. 97091007) is not adequate and complete and does not meet CEQA requirements. This project requires a Subsequent EIR to carefully analyze the impacts and provide mitigation measures for the impacts.These impacts include but are not limited to the following: • Noise • Light • Aesthetics and scenic resources impacted by the 8" perimeter fence • Riparian habitat • Avian resources (nesting and flyway) • Land use not consistent with master plan • Degradation of top soil by the erection of structures • Storm runoff and flooding This project was not properly noticed to the public and key stakeholders, as such proper stakeholder comment and evaluation of issues is missing from this process. Biological resources are impacted. Surveys prior to construction are not going to be sufficient to protect avian resources as bird nesting is an ongoing activity. The park is important to residents' mental and physical health. This area is flat and designated as a campground in the FMEIR.Also, it is the most accessible for users with wheelchairs, walkers and strollers (the Tot Lot is nearby). The Symphony of Flowers project is privatizing and damaging a public park. A vacant lot is more suitable with at least 500 parking spaces. The first Symphony of flowers was located in a vacant lot with several large parking lots in an industrial mixed-use zone at 1000 Av. De La !! Croisee,Terrebonne, QC, Canada. Sincerely yours, Tamara Colby Moore, Tania From: powell_doris <powell_doris@earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:01 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: No on Item 23 I encourage the city council to reject the proposal for the Symphony of flowers because the negative impacts on our community. Doris Powell Sent from my Verizon,Samsung Galaxy smartphone 1 Moore, Tania From: Susan Westover-Giali <susan.westover.giali@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:08 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Citizen's opposition to light/flower show of such a long duration You don't often get email from susan.westover.giali@outlook.com. Learn why this is important Greetings, Council members. I've been a resident of HB for 20 years. I'm writing to express my opposition to the proposed light/flower show in the park. If it was for a limited duration—a few weeks—it might be OK. But having them occupy our park for months at a time is an abuse of the system. It will damage the park and will hurt local wildlife. Our HB residents' use of the park should be prioritized. Thanks for listening. Susan Westover-Giali 4442 Oceanridge Drive Huntington Beach CA 92649 i Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:11 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Symphony of flowers Light show From: Deby Pierce<deby.pierce@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 8:51 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of flowers Light show Some people who received this message don't often get email from deby.pierce@gmail.com. Learn why this is important I'm writing to express my opposition to this event. Please listen to the residents. Prove that you will be the peoples city council. Many many of us are against this. Many of us live in the area. It impacts families and animals. I'm not sure if you could somehow put it to vote of people only living in Huntington Beach without spending money. Majority rules. But just listen please. Moore, Tania From: berreprincess@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:12 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: NO to Symphony of Flowers and the library plaque First off again we have this horrible idea of taking up open public park space to use for a horrible light show when it should never have come back to begin with. We have a lot of wildlife this would effect and destroy the environment around that area as well. Considering the fact nothing could be watered or cared for would also damage and kill trees, plants and the grass there. We have endangered monarch butterflies to think of. Mix in the the variety of birds...including bald eagles. We also have residents that live around the park and it will effect them as well between the traffic, lights and noise. There is not a single reason for this to go on here. It does not fit in with anything in this city at all. Anyone that votes to approve this obvious will show they do not care at all for our beautiful public parks and the nature in it. The city already has money issues thanks to this council and there is no way anyone knows what the cost will end up being to restore things to what it was before...or if you even really will. Shame on any of you that approves this and what it will cost all around. As for the library plaque for the 50th...that plaque is disgusting. If its suppose to be about the 50th anniversary of the public library it should not be made into something political or have names of those in politics on it. The focus should be on the library and only that. I know you will all vote to approve it though since its about you all instead of the library though. Also where is the money really coming from? Noting was mentioned about donations ahead of this and now you are putting this mysteries $7,000 in "donations" into an account? Why? This is just a giant waste of money that does nothing for the city. Where is the transparency with this? When is council going to actually do anything for the city? We have roads that are in badly need of repair. Maybe work on getting that taken care of for once instead of the fascist maga fluff that does nothing for the city. Anna P i Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:12 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Light show in the park From:Cooper Carrasco<askcpr@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 8:58 AM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light show in the park Some people who received this message don't often get email from askcpr@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Please be excellent to your community and tell the light show to keep walking. Stand in solidarity with the Central Park volunteers. The duration of the event and the contract do not seem justified by the money it will(hopefully)generate. Also I think It's Canadian i Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:12 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Light Show From: Stephanie Landis<slandis44@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:00 AM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show Some people who received this message don't often get email from slandis44@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Please do not approve this item. It's not the appropriate location, it's too long, too disruptive to local traffic and local residents, there is not enough parking allocated for such an event. The interruption to the residents and others who use this park should be considered, as well as protecting the open space and wildlife. Stephanie Landis i Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:13 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Opposition to the Symphony of Flowers Light Installation at Huntington Beach Central Park East From:The Village Townhomes, Inc. <vthboard@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:12 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Opposition to the Symphony of Flowers Light Installation at Huntington Beach Central Park East Some people who received this message don't often get email from vthboard@yahoo.com.Learn why this is important Dear Huntington Beach City Council Members, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed Symphony of Flowers light installation at Huntington Beach Central Park East.The proposed installation,with over 100,000 luminous flowers and 500,000 low-emitting LED lights choreographed to music,poses a serious threat to the delicate balance of our park's ecosystem. Central Park East is not just a public space—it is a sanctuary for a vast array of wildlife that relies on this habitat for survival. Every year,we see great horned owls nesting and raising their young on both sides of the park. Hummingbirds, red-tailed hawks, Cooper's hawks,western bluebirds,bushtits, mallards, Egyptian geese, Canada geese, coots, and green herons are just a few of the many bird species that depend on this park.We also have native wildlife such as squirrels, lizards,monarch butterflies,bullfrogs, red-eared sliders, skunks, and raccoons. Many of these animals rely on foraging on the ground, and the proposed light installation will disrupt their natural behaviors, displace them from their habitat, and lead to long-term ecological consequences. The introduction of excessive artificial lighting will have significant negative effects, including: - Disrupting Nocturnal Wildlife: Many species, including great horned owls and raccoons, rely on darkness to hunt and navigate their environment. Bright artificial lights can disorient them and impact their ability to find food. -Altering Bird Migration and Nesting Patterns: Light pollution is known to interfere with bird migration. Birds use natural cues from the moon and stars to navigate, and excessive lighting can cause confusion, leading them away from safe habitats. Nesting birds may also abandon their nests if disturbed by the continuous presence of lights and crowds. - Reducing Insect Populations: Many birds and small mammals rely on insects for food.Artificial lights attract and disorient insects, leading to population declines and disrupting the food chain. - Increasing Foot Traffic and Habitat Degradation: The additional crowds this event will draw will place undue stress on the park's natural spaces. The presence of thousands of visitors will lead to soil compaction, damage to native vegetation, and disturbances that can drive wildlife away permanently. Introducing a three-year- long artificial spectacle will completely alter the park's natural atmosphere and drive away the very wildlife that makes it so special. I also want to highlight that protected species have been observed in our park, including bald eagles and the Ridgway's rail—both of which are federally protected birds. The presence of such species means that any disruption to their habitat could result in violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Endangered i Species Act.The legal and ethical implications of such a decision must be considered before moving forward with this proposal. Even when done on a short-term basis,birds vacate the area,and the grounds suffer lasting damage. I cannot begin to imagine the long-term consequences of a continuous three-year light display in Huntington Beach Central Park East. While I understand that financial incentives may be a motivating factor for this project, I urge you to prioritize environmental stewardship over monetary gain.The health of our local ecosystem and the well-being of the wildlife we share this space with must come first.I strongly urge you to reconsider approving this project and instead focus on initiatives that preserve and protect our city's natural spaces. Thank you for your time and consideration. I hope the City Council will make the responsible decision to preserve our park for future generations. I would appreciate a response on how my concern s are being addressed. • Sincerely, Thank you, Mary Mulloy 9660 Cornwall Drive HB, CA 92646 2 Moore, Tania From: Frances Swolgaard <fswolgaard@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 10:06 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Light show [You don't often get email from fswolgaard@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] February 18,2025 Huntington Beach City Council City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. While I.understand the desire to bring new and exciting events to our community, I believe that the potential negative impacts of this particular event on the park's delicate ecosystem and the community's overall well-being outweigh any perceived benefits. My primary concerns revolve around the potential harm to the park's natural habitat, particularly for migrating birds, including the Bald Eagle, as well as the Monarch butterflies.The proposed light show,with its bright lights and amplified sounds, will undoubtedly disrupt the natural behaviors of these sensitive species. Light pollution and noise can disorient and distress migratory birds, potentially affecting their navigation,feeding, and nesting patterns. Furthermore,the increased foot traffic associated with the event will likely add additional stress to the environment,further damaging the fragile balance of the natural habitat.The Monarch butterflies,known to hibernate in areas close to the park,are also at risk from these disturbances. I am also concerned that the light show will displace other valuable community events that currently utilize the park, such as the Civil War and Revolutionary War Reenactment, and the Cherry Blossom Festival.These events contribute significantly to the community's cultural heritage and provide opportunities for residents to connect with history and enjoy a shared experience. I believe that these events and the light show,while both potentially enjoyable,are not compatible and that the park's resources are limited. Central Park serves as a vital green space for our community. It provides a much-needed retreat from the hustle and bustle of city life,offering a place for relaxation, recreation, and connection with nature.The proposed light show threatens to diminish the tranquility and natural beauty of the park, detracting from its value as a place of respite for residents. -. In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the approval of the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park.'I believe that the potential for damage to the park's ecosystem,the disruption to migrating birds and Monarch butterflies, and the displacement of other community events outweigh any perceived advantages. I encourage the City Council to prioritize the preservation of the park's natural environment and its continued value to the Huntington Beach community. Thank you for your time and consideration 1 Frances Swolgaard Sent from my iPhone 2 Moore, Tania From: K Carroll <kcrissie7@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 10:47 AM To: city.council@surfcity-hb.com;supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: CC Mtg. Items 2/18/2025 Greetings Mayor Pat Burns, Pro Tern Casey McKeon, Council Women Gracey Van Der Mark, Councilmen Don Kennedy, Butch Twining and Chad Williams. I would like to provide brief feedback on the following Items and apologize for my tardiness. but, wanted to assure you that you do have a majority that do support you. You should all have a plaque in your office or even just a sticky easily visible reflecting your number of votes and the number of people who protest your decisions; many, who are repeaters or, in some cases, self serving. 25-102 Approve the Design of a Plaque Celebrating the Huntington Beach Public Library's 50th Anniversary as Recommended by the Community&Library Services Commission Beautiful plaque and well worth the price. Thank you! 25-110 Recommendation to Approve and Adopt Resolution No.2025-08 Appointing Chief Assistant City Attorney Michael J.Vigliotta to the Position of City Attorney for the City of Huntington Beach Great choice. Proven track record. Recommended by Gates who I know has high expectations. No BS or personal agenda, dedicated to HB, matched expertise and you know what you are getting. 25-017 Approve and authorize the execution of a License Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Flowers of the Sky Entertainment, LLC,for the management and operation of the Symphony of Flowers at Huntington Central Park East located at 18381 Goldenwest Street. Absolutely support. We do need to bring in revenue and I know some businesses'will benefit as well. It will be the least disruptive. Only 2% of Central Park and I do not believe it will disrupt the wildlife. I was sold on it bc of the Thursday and wknd days of operation and hours dusk to later in the evening. Most adults that go to these events are not partiers and will be less disruptive to the environment. Much like attendees of Cirque du Soleil which I have attended many. It had a very small footprint. The parking is good and if there are any issues, I do believe that remedies can be implemented for example shuttle from Goldenwest College. I do also like the 30 day cancellation; but, I am confident that it will work out and any issues can be resolved. 25-088 Continued from February 4, 2025 with Public Hearing open-Continue a Tax Equity and Financial Responsibility Act public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2025-05 approving, authorizing, and directing execution of a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement relating to the California Public Finance Authority and approving the Issuance by the California Public Finance Authority of Revenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed$325,000,000 for Marisol HB, LLC,with no City obligations, as well as a Payment in Lieu of Taxes Agreement And, lastly, I do feel I may need some additional insight. I noted 'in lieu of property taxes'. Perhaps, bc it is non profit?...Just on the surface, this seems similar to what happened with Elan. Maybe I missed something. I do recall the rep said that they would be paying an increased interest rate; but, would like more insight on this. If so, does that offset the property taxes and where would these funds go? If someone could get back to me, I would appreciate that. No rush. And finally, a huge thank you for all you have done. Congrats to Don, Butch and Chad.! I voted for all of you including the other existing council. So, if you win, I also win 6You have not heard from me bc„ I have been supportive and appreciative of all you are doing. 6©Thank you for that extra time too. Respectfully, Kris Carroll 2 Moore, Tania From: Hank Mancini <hank@hankmancini.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:33 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Symphony of Flowers You don't often get email from hank@hankmancini.com. Learn why this is important Hello City Council, This messages conveys my objection to the proposed Symphony of Flowers show that I believe the City Council will be voting on Tuesday evening, February 18th. I believe the potential harm that may be done to Central Park is greater than any benefit the city may derive from the proposed event. I urge the City Council to vote against the proposal. Hank Mancini 16372 Magellan Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714-658-0727 Yahoo Mail- Email Simplified Moore, Tania From: Levin, Shannon Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 10:56 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Symphony of Flowers From: Hank Mancini<hank@hankmancini.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:32 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers Some people who received this message don't often get email from hank@hankmancini.com. Learn why this is important Hello City Council, This messages conveys my objection to the proposed Symphony of Flowers show that I believe the City Council will be voting on Tuesday evening, February 18th. I believe the potential harm that may be done to Central Park is greater than any benefit the city may derive from the proposed event. I urge the City Council to vote against the proposal. Hank Mancini 16372 Magellan Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714-658-0727 i Moore, Tania From: Cari Swan <cswanie@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:15 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) Cc: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Oppose Agenda Item#24 at Central Park You don't often get email from cswanie@aol.com. Learn why this is important Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am writing to Oppose Agenda Item #24 Symphony of Flowers at Central Park. For clarification, I am NOT opposed to the Symphony of Flowers at some other (non-park) location in HB. It simply is not a suitable business to operate at Central Park. I hope that I'm wrong, but have heard that some council members are mocking members of the community suggesting they are angry over "dead grass". To be clears, my concerns are broad and substantial: First and foremost, I believe it is the responsibility of council to PROTECT our parks and open spaces that truly enhance our quality of life and maintain HB as the highly sought after suburban beach community we all treasure. I'm also extremely disappointed (but not surprised) at the so-called EIR...that can barely be called an EIR. By staff and council defining the project as "temporary" apparently all bets are off for actually fully reviewing traffic, parking and long term damage to the park and wildlife. Shamefully backing into the desired result (aka Magnolia Tank Farm) rather than actually performing a meaningful Environmental Impact Report. I can only conclude that the potential damage will be substantially worse than what we are guessing as you are all afraid of a full EIR what are you hiding? Or will we simply have to "pass it to find out the ugly details"? I took the time to go back and read a number of articles written from 1990 around the passage of Measure C. Some of you may (or may not...sadly) realize that Measure C was authored by beloved Dave Sullivan, a republican and one of the most respected council members in our history, along with Debbie Cook, a democrat. A massive community effort, much like the preservation of the Bolsa Chica wetlands, also a bipartisan effort. Because of these LEADERS we enjoy and very high quality of life, 11 miles of pristine coastline and world renown wildlife santuaries, but more important, they put the COMMUNITY over PERSONAL GAIN or POLITICAL PARTY. I hope you all can do better, find a new location and meet the goal of additional revenue while preserving our beloved Central Park. Sincerely, Cari Swan Moore, Tania From: Athena Jaharis <miss_athena12@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:25 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Central Park Concerns You don't often get email from miss_athena12@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important Dear City Council Representatives, I urge you not to approve the use of our beautiful Central Park for the proposed light show. To restrict the use of the park and surrounding parking lots for the majority of the year, for the next three years would be an incredible disservice to the community. This space belongs to the people of the city, not a private company that wants to exploit the natural resources for their profit. The proposed profit that would come to city is just laughable. This space serves this community proudly throughout the year with a Revoluntionary War Reenactment, a Civil War Reenactment, community campout, Cub Scout camping and more. Please do not take all of these wonderful opportunities away from the people! The impact on local wildlife, regular park visitors and library patrons would also be a problem. The term and location of this project should be reconsidered! Sincerely, Athena Dryden Yahoo Mail: Search. Organize. Conquer i Moore, Tania From: See California <seecalifornia@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 1:40 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: NO on Item 24 [You don't often get email from seecalifornia@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification I am opposed Item 24. It will impact the public enjoyment and use of Central Park, and also the traffic on streets going into the event. This is the wrong place for such an event. It should be held at the Great Park in Irvine where there's more space. If you don't know about traffic jams,just try to turn left onto Talbert from Gothard Street when the light backs up.Some days drivers must sit through several light cycles.Central Park, itself,already hosts summer concerts,Concour's Car Show, Surf City Marathon, 2 Civil War events,Taste of HB and many more events. Why are you putting our beloved park up for bid and committing to a year or 3 years of commercial enterprise? Please don't. Best, Debbie Stock, resident near Central Park. 1 Moore, Tania From: Gab <gabriela_menendez@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:09 PM To: CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF) Cc: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF) Subject: Re: Symphony of Flowers Vote - Request to table You don't often get email from gabriela_menendez@yahoo.com.Learn why this is important I did not receive a confirmation of receipt. On Monday, February 17, 2025, 5:53 PM, Gab<gabriela_menendez@yahoo.com>wrote: Dear City Council Members, I am writing to express my significant concerns regarding the proposed location for the upcoming vote for the Symphony of Flowers event,and its impact on our park.While I acknowledge the efforts invested in the environmental study, I respectfully disagree with several of its conclusions and believe the chosen venue presents considerable challenges to preserve it. My understanding is that similar events held at the beach have demonstrated success, suggesting that alternative locations may be more suitable and pose less environmental risk. Therefore, I strongly urge you to reconsider the current proposal and explore the viability of relocating the event to a our city beach or another appropriate alternative. I understand a vote is scheduled for tomorrow's meeting,and I sincerely hope you will carefully weigh the points raised here before casting your vote. I believe a change of location would better serve the event's objectives and minimize potential negative impacts. Respectfully, Gabriela Menendez. 1 Moore, Tania From: MEG ROBINSON <twokyu@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:31 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Fwd: No on the symphony of flowers Begin forwarded message: From: MEG ROBINSON <twokyu@aol.com> Date: February 17, 2025 at 5:10:49 PM PST To: City.Council@surfcity-hb.org Subject: No on the symphony of flowers No on, the symphony of flowers This is a terrible idea. Our Central Park is a treasure. Its inhabitants include numerous species of birds, ducks, geese, hawks and eagles, turtles, lizards, ground and tree squirrels, groundhogs, mice, rats, raccoons, and coyotes. It's a virtual zoo in an urban setting. All of these will be affected negatively by the Symphony of Flowers show. I have read the Environmental Impact report which presents more questions and concerns than it does answers. Re:noise:What is the expected noise level? I could not find this info in the report.Also if needed, how will the noise be quieted down to 60 dBA as reported when this is the level of normal conversation.Who will hear the show? Lights:There will be addition of lighting which is claimed to be low level compared to ambient lighting.Was this measured?This is particularly important since the report states "if installation of the Project's lighting results in substantially greater increased nighttime illuminance,these species, and others using the BSA, could potentially be subject to altered physiological processes, decreased habitat availability, and increased predation. " The report also states there will be surveys by biologists. Many of these seem to be pre- activity.Why wouldn't they be ongoing since the added light, sound, and human presence are all known factors that negatively affect the fauna of our great Central Park. The report also uses a great number of euphemisms such as " not expected to, not anticipated to, less than significant impact, and not expected not to substantially increase which you all seem to present as a definitive there will be no problem. i I believe you are not being truthful in your representation of this Project, that you are unrealistic and are ignoring the problems it will bring not only to the park but to the surrounding area, least of all with traffic and parking. Furthermore you are delusional in your estimates of the financial gains it will bring to the city compared to the deleterious effects it will have on the citizens and the parks quality of life. For these reasons I am imploring a NO vote and ask you to let well enough alone for once. Meg Robinson HB 20 year resident 2 Moore, Tania From: Sue Kingman <sue.b.kingman@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:36 PM To: McKeon, Casey; supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL (INCL. CMO STAFF) Subject: Re: Opposing Symphony of Flowers Project Some people who received this message don't often get email from sue.b.kingman@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Mr. McKeon, I appreciate the reply, but don't feel that concerns have been sufficiently addressed: • Where will these "parking areas and transportation" be located?Will it impede local residents' access to the library, park, and sports complex?With an expected 900 visitors per show, plus 50+ employees present that day, that is quite an impact. • It's sad to me that the people who enjoy the park without a fee will no longer be able to do that in a large area of it. Is there not another venue or private property where this can be done? • Also, the Civil and Revolutionary War reenactments are 4 days out of the year.This will be 8+ months. That's a big difference to the impact on the surrounding wildlife. I hope you will be employing the biologists recommended in the Environmental Impact Report to assess throughout the project as was mentioned in the report. Maybe cutting the superfluous$7,000 for the MAGA plaque on the library is a good start to eliminate your debt? Thank you, Sue Kingman Huntington Beach Resident On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 1:18 PM McKeon, Casey<Casey.McKeon@ surfci y-hb.org>wrote: Thank you for your email Sue. Our biggest challenge right now is that we have a structural budget deficit where our reoccurring expenses exceed our reoccurring revenues. Next year we are projected to have an $8.8 million deficit. While we continue to create operational efficiencies in our City departments to reduce expenses, we have limited levers we can pull to create more revenue. Property tax is our number once source of revenue and we as a community through electing us, have decided not to develop high density housing. That means we have to attract more businesses to invest here which we are doing, attract more residents and visitors to shop here to increase our sales tax revenue and host more events to create revenue and fill our hotels. The Symphony of Flowers is only a one year commitment with the potential to bring approximately $400k in revenue to our City. i We have performed an Environmental Impact Report that shows no nature nor wildlife will be disturbed and we have structured the contract to ensure the park will be maintained, preserved and the trees protected. Parking areas and transportation have been defined and coordinated. With those guardrails in place it's worth trying this event from the operators of Cavalia, founders of Cirque Du Soleil, for one year. The location of the event is in the same location as where the Revolutionary and Civil War reenactments are held where cannon and musket blasts occur and there hasn't been any damage to the balance of wild life. This event has illuminated flowers on the ground and a water wall show like Fantasmic with only ambient music. Thank you. Casey McKeon Mayor Pro Ternpore City Council For Appointments: (714) 536- 5553 Cell: (714) 794- 5322 Casey.McKeon@surfcity-hb.org CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 On Feb 17, 2025, at 9:57 AM, Sue Kingman <sue.b.kingman@gmail.com>wrote: Some people who received this message don't often get email from sue.b.kingman@gmail.com. Learn why this is important City Council, Please do not proceed with the "Symphony of Flowers" project. Central Park is a beloved greenspace that so many people use for walking, bird watching, picnics and parties, even Pokemon Go gatherings. Being able to walk around the whole park is a draw, and cutting off access to parts of it, cutting off irrigation, killing plants, and disturbing so many nesting birds is cruel and irresponsible. 2 Also,where will other city events that are often held there, like the Cherry Blossom Festival, Scouts BSA Camperall,American and Civil War reenactments, take place? How will this impact the Youth Shelter, which is right next door, and outdoor library events that are free to the public? And where will everyone coming to this huge event that will last 8 months of the year go to park? Parking is already tight since the parking area is for access to the park, the library, and the sports complex.This is a very ill thought-out idea. If you want to put in some big money-making overblown tourist attraction, please put it somewhere other than A PUBLIC PARK that is already enjoyed by thousands of residents and costs them no money to enjoy. Purchase an empty lot or parking lot, don't take away public space from the people, plants, and animals who love and enjoy it. Thank you, Sue Kingman Huntington Beach Resident 3 Moore, Tania From: Gary Ray <skirays@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:47 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Light Show @ Central Park You don't often get email from skirays@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important We urge the Huntington Beach City Council to: — Cancel the proposed light display in Huntington Beach Central Park. — Conduct a full environmental impact study before making decisions that could harm local wildlife. —► Consider alternative locations that do not interfere with delicate ecosystems. — Prioritize eco-friendly initiatives that align with Huntington Beach's values of nature conservation and sustainability. Donna Ray HB resident Moore, Tania From: Michael Gonzales <mikegisyourpal@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 4:34 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Regarding the light show [You don't often get email from mikegisyourpal@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] Please reconsider,this will not only have major negative effects on the precious and special environment and wild life species of this park but it will also burden the surrounding neighborhood with traffic, parking issues and foot traffic through their streets. Please there must be another option. Thank you! Michael Gonzales HB resident 1 Moore, Tania From: Jeannette Doeller <doellerj@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 4:56 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: City Council Motions February 18 2025 You don't often get email from doellerj@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important I oppose the MAGA Library Plaque. I oppose the City of Flowers contract for Central Park. I support putting the library petitions on the ballot. Thank you. Jeannette Doeller, PhD cell: 205.222.7348 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 5:28 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: **Opposition to Proposed Light Show in Huntington Beach Central Park** From: Michelle Yeager<chell27m@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:51 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org>; Kennedy, Don <Don.Kennedy@surfcity-hb.org>; Burns, Pat<Pat.Burns@surfcity-hb.org>; Strickland,Tony<Tony.Strickland@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: **Opposition to Proposed Light Show in Huntington Beach Central Park ** Some people who received this message don't often get email from chell27m@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Michelle Yeager 15363 Goldenwest St. B23 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 chell27m@gmail.com 909-702-8284 February 18, 2025 Huntington Beach City Council City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. While I understand the desire to bring new and exciting events to our community, I believe that the potential negative impacts of this particular event on the park's delicate ecosystem and the community's overall well-being outweigh any perceived benefits. My primary concerns revolve around the potential harm to the park's natural habitat, particularly for migrating birds, including the Bald Eagle, as well as the Monarch butterflies. The proposed light show, with its bright lights and amplified sounds, will undoubtedly disrupt the natural behaviors of these sensitive species. Light pollution and noise can disorient and distress migratory birds, potentially affecting their navigation, feeding, and nesting patterns. Furthermore, the increased foot traffic associated with the event will likely add additional stress to the environment, further damaging the fragile balance of the natural habitat.The Monarch butterflies, known to hibernate in areas close to the park, are also at risk from these disturbances. I am also concerned that the light show will displace other valuable community events that currently 1 utilize the park, such as the Civil War and Revolutionary War Reenactment, and the Cherry Blossom Festival.These events contribute significantly to the community's cultural heritage and provide opportunities for residents toconnect with history and enjoy a shared experience. I believe that these events and the light show,while both potentially enjoyable, are not compatible and that the park's resources are limited. Central Park serves as a vital green space for our community. It provides a much-needed retreat from the hustle and bustle of city life, offering a place for relaxation, recreation, and connection with nature.The proposed light show threatens to diminish the tranquility and natural beauty of the park, detracting from its value as a place of respite for residents. In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the approval of the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. I believe that the potential for damage to the park's ecosystem,the disruption to migrating. birds and Monarch butterflies, and the displacement of other community events outweigh any perceived advantages. I encourage the City Council to prioritize the preservation of the park's natural environment and its continued value to the Huntington Beach community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Michelle Yeager 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 5:29 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Symphony of Flowers From: Hank Mancini<hank@hankmancini.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 8:32 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Symphony of Flowers Some people who received this message don't often get email from hank@thankmancini.com. Learn why this is important Hello City Council, This messages conveys my objection to the proposed Symphony of Flowers show that I believe the City Council will be voting on Tuesday evening, February 18th. I believe the potential harm that may be done to Central Park is greater than any benefit the city may derive from the proposed event. I urge the City Council to vote against the proposal. Hank Mancini 16372 Magellan Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714-658-0727 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 5:30 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: proposed light display at HCP From:James Pike<jimpike444@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 10:49 AM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: proposed light display at HCP Some people who received this message don't often get email from jimpike444@g_mail.com. Learn why this is important I'm writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed plan for a near-year-round light display at Huntington Central Park. Having lived in the city just two miles from the park for the past 40 years, I am certain I have spent more time there than any other local attraction. The park remains one of the crown jewels among the county parks, and it should be treated as such. Open areas in the NE end of the park need to remain open rather than be marred by bleachers and light shows. People walk their dogs there, birdwatch, play volleyball, lay on blankets and read, and generally enjoy the greenery and beauty of the park. The park doesn't need another attraction, as it already provides all of the attraction that is necessary. Please leave well enough alone. respectfully, James Pike 18742 Beach Blvd Moore, Tania From: Natalie Moser <nataliemoser76@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 7:43 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF); supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Hopkins, Travis; Cathey Ryder Subject: Agenda Item 24 - (25-017) - Symphony of Flowers License agreement Some people who received this message don't often get email from nataliemoser76@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Good evening, I'm reaching out as a member of Protect HB. Regarding the use of the Master EIR for item 24 on tonight's agenda, it's my understanding that you can't use the Master EIR because (1) no validation reports have been completed every 5 years, and (2) no findings are being made as required by section 15379. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Natalie Moser i Moore, Tania From: Melissa Lippincott <mellippincott@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9:29 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: HB light display You don't often get email from mellippincott@gmail.com.Learn why this is important Hello Huntington Beach City Council I urge you to please consider the following: 1. Cancel the proposed light display in Huntington Beach Central Park. 2. Conduct a full environmental impact study before making decisions that could harm local wildlife. 3. Consider alternative locations that do not interfere with delicate ecosystems. 4. Prioritize eco-friendly initiatives that align with Huntington Beach's values of nature conservation and sustainability. Thank you, Melissa Lippincott 714-267-8065 i • Moore, Tania From: Shelley Colangelo <shelleycolangelo@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 10:55 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Light show [You don't often get email from shelleycolangelo@icloud.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification Dear Council members, Many voted for you to respect our space and no high density housing. Some of us also are not for nature being disturbed at Central.Park as well. I wrote to last council members before you about my concerns about increased traffic and impact on nature, I was not listened to then-please do better! No light show at Central Park! Shelley Colangelo Sent from my iPhone 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:16 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Light show Central Park From: Peggie Perkins<peggiesings@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:17 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Fwd: Light show Central Park Some people who received this message don't often get email from peggiesingsPgmail.com. Learn why this is important Forwarded message From: Peggie Perkins <peggiesings@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2025, 1:23 AM Subject: Light show Central Park To: <City.Council@surfcity.hb.org> Good morning writing about the proposed light show in the Central Park in Huntington Beach. I have used this park for the last 5 years to have quiet peace beauty nature and to get my exercise in a beautiful serene natural place. I've seen many types of wildlife there including birds etc that I'll come to this place under migratory patterns also enjoying the monarch butterflies and other various animals that roam and use the park as home. I would be devastated if the wildlife was upset by the lights that would change there circadian rhythms and their feeding practices and also be upset if it bought crowds and music and noise....the park is a part of my weekly and daily self-care for myself. I find it almost essential for me to be able to carry on with my busy life so I have a place of solace there I hope and pray that they reconsider this move. Thank you for listening. Peg Rollins 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:16 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Light Show From: Elaine Parker<epmmrpl@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:17 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show Some people who received this message don't often get email from epmmrplCagmail.com.Learn why this is important Cancel the proposed light display in Huntington Beach Central Park. sConduct a full environmental impact study before making decisions that could harm local wildlife. Consider alternative locations that do not interfere with delicate ecosystems. 1 Prioritize eco-friendly initiatives that align with Huntington Beach's values of nature conservation and sustain ability. Elaine Parker 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:17 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Central Park Concerns From:Athena Jaharis<miss_athena12@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:24 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Central Park Concerns Some people who received this message don't often get email from miss athenal2Pyahoo.com. Learn why this is important Dear City Council Representatives, I urge you not to approve the use of our beautiful Central Park for the proposed light show.To restrict the use of the park and surrounding parking lots for the majority of the year, for the next three years would be an incredible disservice to the community. This space belongs to the people of the city, not a private company that wants to exploit the natural resources for their profit.The proposed profit that would come to city is just laughable. This space serves this community proudly throughout the year with a Revoluntionary War Reenactment, a Civil War Reenactment, community campout, Cub Scout camping and more. Please do not take all of these wonderful opportunities away from the people!The impact on local wildlife, regular park visitors and library patrons would also be a problem. The term and location of this project should be reconsidered! Sincerely, Athena Dryden Yahoo Mail: Search. Organize. Conquer i Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:17 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: No light show Original Message From: Frances Swolgaard <fswolgaard@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18,2025 12:24 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: No light show [Some people who received this message don't often get email from fswolgaard@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification February 18, 2025 Huntington Beach City Council City Hall 2000 Main Street . Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. While I understand the desire to bring new and exciting events to our community, I believe that the potential negative impacts of this particular event on the park's delicate ecosystem and the community's-overall well-being outweigh any perceived benefits. My primary concerns revolve around the potential harm to the park's natural habitat, particularly for migrating birds, including the Bald Eagle, as well as the Monarch butterflies.The proposed light show,with its bright lights and amplified sounds,will undoubtedly disrupt the natural behaviors of these sensitive species. Light pollution and noise can disorient and distress migratory birds, potentially affecting their navigation,feeding, and nesting patterns. Furthermore,the increased foot traffic associated with the event will likely add additional stress to the environment,further damaging the fragile balance of the natural habitat.The.Monarch butterflies, known to hibernate in areas close to the park,are also at risk from these disturbances. I am also concerned that the light show will displace other valuable community events that currently utilize the park, such as the Civil War and Revolutionary War Reenactment, and the Cherry Blossom Festival.These events contribute significantly to the community's cultural heritage and provide opportunities for residents to connect with history and enjoy a shared experience. I believe that these events and the light show,while both potentially enjoyable,are not compatible and that the park's resources are limited. Central Park serves as a vital green space for our community. It provides a much-needed retreat from the hustle and bustle of city life, offering a place for relaxation, recreation, and connection with nature.The proposed light show threatens to diminish the tranquility and natural beauty of the park, detracting from its value as a place of respite for residents. 1 In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the approval of the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. I believe that the potential for damage to the park's ecosystem,the disruption to migrating birds and Monarch butterflies, and the displacement of other community events outweigh any perceived advantages. I encourage the City Council to prioritize the preservation of the park's natural environment and its continued value to the Huntington Beach community. Thank you for your time and consideration Thank you, Frances Swolgaard Sent from my iPhone 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:17 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Light Show at Park From: Shelly C<hbshelly@me.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:36 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show at Park Some people who received this message don't often get email from hbshelly@me.com. Learn why this is important DO NOT DESTROY THE LAST BIT OF OPEN SPACE FOR OUR WILDLIFE WITH A LONG TERM LIGHT POLLUTION EVENT. Nocturnal animals sleep during the day and are active at night. Light pollution radically alters their nighttime environment by turning night into day. According to research scientist Christopher Kyba, for nocturnal animals "the introduction of artificial light probably represents the most drastic change human beings have made to their environment." L - E -D's do not belong in the park. PUT IT AT THE BEACH OR A PARKING LOT or CANCEL the concept. Try fixing the waterfalls, planting trees (not destroying them) and clean up the water in the library park first. The LONG TERM impact this will have on the park is not reversible. Enough with the $$ grab already. It must END AND while you are at it.... STOP with the FLOCKING of your citizens. Everyone has a right to privacy and not to be DOXED at every street corner and parking lot! Read the CONSTITUTION and UNDERSTAND the Bill of Rights 1 UCC 1-308 Privileged And Confidential Communication: This email and any attachments (1)are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act(18 USC.§§ 2510-2521), (2) may contain confidential or legally privileged information, and (3) are for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender and delete.Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of information received in error is strictly prohibited.You are instructed to delete this email if it does not belong to you and remove off your servers. 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:17 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: HB central park light show From: Cynthia Forsthoff<cforsthoff@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 12:42 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: HB central park light show Some people who received this message don't often get email from cforsthoff@gmail.com.Learn why this is important Dear city council, I am writing in opposition to the light show being proposed for our central park. Our central park is one of the city's jewels. Citizens and visitors flock to the park to walk, jog, bird watch, walk their dog, picnic and on and on. The park is free to all. The light show will close off a significant section of the park to everyone for 8 months of the year. Contrary to the EIR report, wildlife will be impacted as will the ecology of the park. Everyone, people and animals alike, will be subjected to noise and light pollution. Why are we selling our park to a private business? There is no upside to Huntington Beach. Vote no. Cindy Forsthoff resident of Huntington Beach Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:18 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Central Park Light Show From: EEJF McKirachan<bfmckirachan@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 1:23 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Fwd: Central Park Light Show Some people who received this message don't often get email from bfmckirachan@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Another try. Forwarded message From: EEJF McKirachan <bfmckir_achan@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:39 PM Subject: Central Park Light Show To: <CityXouncil@sufcity-hb.org> Dear Council-members; Please let nature rest at night in Central Park. The American Eagles have been seen and are protected. Other even nocturnal animals like possums that have historical paths that run through the proposed space that you might think is empty, would be disturbed by even a temporary Light Show, let alone a 3 year project. Will you all not eat the nights of the show? If you are interested in a light show, can you use an already available space like stadiums, or even parking lots with trees? Why not private space like Sherman's Gardens, the convention center, or other private land lands that already have permits to make money. Consider contacting schools and solar companies to try to make a deal to see if they want covered solar panels in half the lot and a light show in the other half, once down the power goes to the city or space. I have seen light shows at outside venues like Disneyland and Epcot, and indoors at a Planetarium and Anaheim Convention Center. What's available at he HB convention area? i think there are too many let's throw the idea out there just to see if it flies. The idea that it's only 2% of the park is "remote" and not"used" is missing the point of appropriate location. Maybe not by paying public, but by nature that uses every square inch of this earth. Using logic making money from unused space would say this city hall as a perfect location. Using promotional materials to sell this idea to nature lovers is disrespectful and indicates you can't listen. 1 Please avoid natural spots for plastic flowers and a lights that are only humans can enjoy and at a price many can't afford. Why wouldn't Boeing or other private land owners not offer up space for this show? Not even sure how HB city lawyers approved this one. Didn't we learn liability issues from the air show fiascos, oil spills and other"unavoidable" natural events?Walk at your own risk clause when you pay buy a ticket. Making public "nature" space, private for a "spectacular" and money making for a private "company" is just wrong! Even sharing profits with the city is dubious at best. I have been to Circus de Soliel at Irvine Spectrum. A place with the space, parking and designated space for one of these event. Can Pacific City/convention center figure out a route and a way to make this happen? Maybe the cleaned up ASCON dump site would be a perfect site for a cleared space with parking in the city leased from Magnolia Tank farm! I think the coyotes and squirrels have already been relocated. Please don't waste any more money on using the park unless you plan on compensating your person natural space for public use. Please keep the parks natural. Thank you for your time and consideration! Elizabeth Eagleton McKirachan HB home owner References: PS Reference to Light Show Description: The show, which would be staged in the northeastern portion of Central Park East, features more than 100,000 luminous flowers and more than 500,000 low- emitting LED lights, choreographed to classical music. It starts with the audience in bleacher seating, before the ticket-holders are allowed to walk among the flowers. https://m.youtube.com/@symphoniedesfleurs9806 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:18 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: No to Prposed Light Show From: Deborah Addy<debbie.addy126@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 1:24 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: No to Prposed Light Show Some people who received this message don't often get email from debbie.addy126@gmail.com.Learn why this is important February 18, 2025 Huntington Beach City Council City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. While I understand the desire to bring new and exciting events to our community, I believe that the potential negative impacts of this particular event on the park's delicate ecosystem and the community's overall well-being outweigh any perceived benefits. My primary concerns revolve around the potential harm to the park's natural habitat, particularly for migrating birds, including the Bald Eagle, as well as the Monarch butterflies. The proposed light show, with its bright lights and amplified sounds, will undoubtedly disrupt the natural behaviors of these sensitive species. Light pollution and noise can disorient and distress migratory birds, potentially affecting their navigation, feeding, and nesting patterns. Furthermore, the increased foot traffic associated with the event will likely add additional stress to the environment, further damaging the fragile balance of the natural habitat. The Monarch butterflies, known to hibernate in areas close to the park, are also at risk from these disturbances. I am also concerned that the light show will displace other valuable community events that currently utilize the park, such as the Civil War and Revolutionary War Reenactment, and the Cherry Blossom Festival.These events contribute significantly to the community's cultural heritage and provide opportunities for residents to connect with history and enjoy a shared experience. I believe that these events and the light show, while both potentially enjoyable, are not compatible and that the park's resources are limited. Central Park serves as a vital green space for our community. It provides a much-needed retreat from the 1 hustle and bustle of city life, offering a place for relaxation, recreation, and connection with nature.The proposed light show threatens to diminish the tranquility and natural beauty of the park, detracting from its value as a place of respite for residents. In conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the approval of the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. I believe that the potential for damage to the park's ecosystem,the disruption to migrating birds and Monarch butterflies, and the displacement of other community events outweigh any perceived advantages. I encourage the City Council to prioritize the preservation of the park's natural environment and its continued value to the Huntington Beach community: Thank you for your time and consideration, Deborah Addy 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:18 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Central Park Light Show and the Bald Eagles From: Michael Nelson <mnelson770@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 1:51 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Central Park Light Show and the Bald Eagles Some people who received this message don't often get email from mnelson770@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Dear Members of the City Council, Please don't be known as the City Council that drove the bald eagles out of Central Park due to the high- density development of the light show. If the light show happens, the two eagles that use Central Park will be harassed by the light and noise and will leave. Please vote "No" on the light show and put the great symbol of the United States of America first, not a commercial light show. Please retain the freedom of the bald eagles and the citizens of Huntington Beach to use our park. The bald eagles and I are not feeling so free in HB right now. Michael Nelson 16311 Duchess Lane, HB i Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:19 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: "light show is a No No!" • Original Message From: Brandi Martinez<malibubrandi@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 1:59 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: "light show is a No No!" [Some people who received this message don't often get email from malibubrandi@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/Lea rnAboutSenderldentification Attention--self serving Council, I am writing to Oppose Agenda Item#24 Symphony of Flowers at Central Park. For clarification, I am NOT opposed to the Symphony of Flowers at some other(non-park) location in HB. It simply is not a suitable business to operate at Central Park. I hope that I'm wrong,but have heard that some council members are mocking members of the community suggesting they are angry over"dead grass".To be clears, my concerns are broad and substantial: First and foremost, I believe it is the responsibility of council to PROTECT our parks and open spaces that truly enhance our quality of life and maintain HB as the highly sought after suburban beach community we all treasure. I'm also extremely disappointed-(but not surprised)at the so-called EIR...that can barely be called an EIR. By staff and council defining the project as "temporary" apparently all bets are off for actually fully reviewing traffic, parking and long term damage to the park and wildlife. Shamefully backing into the desired result(aka Magnolia Tank Farm) rather than actually performing a meaningful Environmental Impact Report. I can only conclude that the potential damage will be substantially worse than what we are guessing as you are all afraid of a full EIR what are you hiding? Or will we simply have to "pass it to find out the ugly details"? - I took the time to go back and read a number of articles written from 1990 around the passage of Measure C.Some of you may(or may not...sadly) realize that Measure C was authored by beloved Dave Sullivan, a republican and one of the most respected council members in our history,along with Debbie Cook,a democrat.A massive community effort, much like the preservation of the Bolsa Chica wetlands,also a bipartisan effort. Because of these LEADERS we enjoy and very high quality of life, 11 miles of pristine coastline and world renown wildlife santuaries, but more important,they put the COMMUNITY over PERSONAL GAIN or POLITICAL PARTY. I hope you all can do better,find a new location and meet the goal of additional revenue while preserving our beloved Central Park. Disdainfully, Brandi Martinez 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:20 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Light Show From:Janet Bean <janetbeandesigns@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:15 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Light Show The last city council, with the majority being left leaning, was voted out because they failed to listen to what the community wanted, that is the reason you are now in these seats. No other reason than the community had no faith in them anymore. Your vote tonight will be what sets the tone for the rest of your time as ELECTED officials. The community has spoken very loudly about how bad this idea is and that they do not want it in their Central Park. Your vote tonight will either show the community that you are listening or that you are no better than the left leaning council that felt they knew better. Your vote to night will either garner a lot of faith in you or it will show us all that you have no intention on listening to the voters, sticking to your campaign promises and that you do not care about the community. Your vote tonight will decide if you ever earn another vote from those that trusted you. Lose trust, you lose everything. This all about the mighty dollar and not what is in the best interest of the community. Money ends up again the root of all evil. Please do not ruin our park. Thank you, Janet Bean 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:20 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Oppose Agenda item#24 at Central Park Original Message From: Nancy Buchoz<nancybuchoz@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:15 PM To`. CITY COUNCIL(INCL.CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Oppose Agenda item#24 at Central Park Hello I am emailing to oppose the.Symphony of Flowers light show at Central Park. Central Park has been and should be a protected area in our city. This is one of the most utilized parks in our city, as you all have mentioned before it is considered "The Crown Jewel of HB". To contradict this and now state,that this interior portion of the park is " underutilized" makes no sense. The discussion about cell phone data saying the park was only used by 1%of the population doesn't take into account that NOT EVERYONE BRINGS THIER PHONES TO THE PARK.. OR TO RUN, EXERCISE, PRAY, EAT, OR JUST ENJOY the park. This gorgeous interior location is one of the most PEACEFUL location within the park. Allowing thousands of people, lights, and killing the lawns,(even temporarily) along with displacing the wildlife that lives in those trees, and shrubbery all along the perimeter of the proposed space seems like a huge negative . Our Central Park locations, are worth far more than the modest rate of return talked about with this event. Please stop this process, and go back to the drawing board. Maybe some of you on Council don't agree that the parks need preserving. Maybe you think that birds are a dime a dozen, maybe you don't understand that some of us feel that this park and our community is worth preserving, not exploiting. Maybe to sonie of us,this park is the epitome of the Suburban Beach Community???? Which you all swore you would protect. Please honor that campaign promise. Don't give away our parks bit by bit. Once they are gone,they are gone. Please don't saturate all the cities open and green spaces to fund a never ending pension issue. We will lose it all if we continue down that path. Once open space is changed,temporarily or not, nature is altered as well. Some species adapt,while others will never come back. If you all don't care about that aspect,then it would make perfect sense that this show will go on. If you do care about more than just modest financial gain, at the expense of one of the most peaceful areas of Central Park then I hope.you will change your vote and find a location that doesn't cause such upheaval, dissension in the community and desecration of the natural habitat. Even temporarily... Nancy Buchoz 9001 Rhodesia Dr 1 HB 92646 Resident since 1976' 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:21 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: No to the Symphony of Flowers From:Stephen MacDowell<toyomo@sbcglobal.net> Sent:Tuesday,February 18, 2025 2:32 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: No to the Symphony of Flowers Dear Huntington Beach City Council, Please do not approve the Symphony of Flower request to put on shows in our Central Park. The park is one of the city crown jewels. It should not be made exclusive through pricey shows, or degraded by the presence of a very large performance area including seating, etc. Moreover, the park would disrupt the wildlife and birds who inhabit the park. We have a nesting pair of bald eagles that make the park their home. Please leave the park like it is, so all HB residents can enjoy it without disrupting it's habit. Stephen MacDowell • 5601 Middlecoff Dr. HB, Ca 92649 • Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:21 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Central Park Original Message From: leslie coleman<moddy23@icloud.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18,2025 2:35 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Central Park [Some people who received this message don't often get email from moddy23@icloud.com: Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification] Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am writing to Oppose Agenda Item#24 Symphony of Flowers at Central Park. For clarification, I am NOT opposed to the Symphony of Flowers at some other(non-park) location in HB. It simply is not a suitable business to operate at Central Park. I hope that I'm wrong, but have heard that some council members are mocking members of the community suggesting they are angry over"dead grass".To be clears, my concerns are broad and substantial: First and foremost, I believe it is the responsibility of council to PROTECT our parks and open spaces that truly enhance our quality of life and maintain HB as the highly sought after suburban beach community we all treasure. I'm also extremely disappointed (but not surprised)at the so-called EIR...that can barely be called an EIR. By staff and council defining the project as"temporary"apparently all bets are off for actually fully reviewing traffic, parking and long term damage to the park and wildlife. Shamefully backing into the desired result(aka Magnolia Tank Farm) rather than actually performing a meaningful Environmental Impact Report. I can only conclude that the potential damage will be substantially worse than what we are guessing as you are all afraid of a full EIR what are you hiding? Or will we simply have to"pass it to find out the ugly details"? I took the time to go back and read a number of articles written from 1990 around the passage of Measure C.Some of you may(or may not...sadly) realize that Measure C was authored by beloved Dave Sullivan, a republican and one of the most respected council members in our history,along with Debbie Cook, a democrat.A massive community effort, much like the preservation of the Bolsa Chica wetlands, also a bipartisan effort. Because of these LEADERS we enjoy and very high quality of life, 11 miles of pristine coastline and world renown wildlife santuaries, but more important,they put the COMMUNITY over PERSONAL GAIN or POLITICAL PARTY. I hope you all can do better,find a new location and meet the goal of additional revenue while preserving our beloved Central Park. Leslie Coleman 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:22 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Opposing Symphony of Flowers Project From:Sue Kingman <sue.b.kingman@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:36 PM To: McKeon, Casey<Casey.McKeon@surfcity-hb.org>; supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org; CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF) <city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject: Re: Opposing Symphony of Flowers Project Some people who received this message don't often get email from sue.b.kingman@gmail.com.Learn why this is important Mr. McKeon, I appreciate the reply, but don't feel that concerns have been sufficiently addressed: • Where will these "parking areas and transportation" be located?Will it impede local residents' access to the library, park, and sports complex?With an expected 900 visitors per show, plus 50+ employees present that day, that is quite an impact. • It's sad to me that the people who enjoy the park without a fee will no longer be able to do that in a large area of it. Is there not another venue or private property where this can be done? • Also, the Civil and Revolutionary War reenactments are 4 days out of the year. This will be 8+ months.That's a big difference to the impact on the surrounding wildlife. I hope you will be employing the biologists recommended in the Environmental Impact Report to assess throughout the project as was mentioned in the report. Maybe cutting the superfluous$7,000 for the MAGA plaque on the library is a good start to eliminate your debt? Thank you, Sue Kingman Huntington Beach Resident On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 1:18 PM McKeon, Casey<Casey.McKeon@surfcity-hb.org>wrote: Thank you for your email Sue. Our biggest challenge right now is that we have a structural budget deficit where our reoccurring expenses exceed our reoccurring revenues. Next year we are projected to have an $8.8 million deficit. i While we continue to create operational efficiencies in our City departments to reduce expenses,we have limited levers we can pull to create more revenue. Property tax is our number once source of revenue and we as a community through electing us, have decided not to develop high density housing. That means we have to attract more businesses to invest here which we are doing, attract more residents and visitors to shop here to increase our sales tax revenue and host more events to create revenue and fill our hotels. The Symphony of Flowers is only a one year commitment with the potential to bring approximately $400k in revenue to our City. We have performed an Environmental Impact Report that shows no nature nor wildlife will be disturbed and we have structured the contract to ensure the park will be maintained, preserved and the trees protected. Parking areas and transportation have been defined and coordinated. With those guardrails in place it's worth trying this event from the operators of Cavalia, founders of Cirque Du Soleil, for one year. The location of the event is in the same location as where the Revolutionary and Civil War reenactments are held where cannon and musket blasts occur and there hasn't been any damage to the balance of wild life. This event has illuminated flowers on the ground and a water wall show like Fantasmic with only ambient music. Thank you. Casey McKeon Mayor Pro Tempore City Council For Appointments: (714) 536 - 5553 Cell: (714) 794- 5322 Casey.McKeon@surfcity-hb.org CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 On Feb 17, 2025, at 9:57 AM, Sue Kingman <s_ue.b.kingman@gmail.com>wrote: 2 Some people who received this message don't often get email from sue.b.kingmanPgmail.com. Learn why this is important City Council, Please do not proceed with the "Symphony of Flowers" project. Central Park is a beloved greenspace that so many people use for walking, bird watching, picnics and parties, even Pokemon Go gatherings. Being able to walk around the whole park is a draw, and cutting off access to parts of it, cutting off irrigation, killing plants, and disturbing so many nesting birds is cruel and irresponsible. Also, where will other city events that are often held there, like the Cherry Blossom Festival, Scouts BSA Camperall, American and Civil War reenactments, take place? How will this impact the Youth Shelter, which is right next door, and outdoor library events that are free to the public? And where will everyone coming to this huge event that will last 8 months of the year go to park? Parking is already tight since the parking area is for access to the park, the library, and the sports complex. This is a very ill thought-out idea. If you want to put in some big money-making overblown tourist attraction, please put it somewhere other than A PUBLIC PARK that is already enjoyed by thousands of residents and costs them no money to enjoy. Purchase an empty lot or parking lot, don't take away public space from the people, plants, and animals who love and enjoy it. Thank you, Sue Kingman Huntington Beach Resident 3 Moore, Tania From: • _ Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:22 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: Opposition to Light Show in HB Central Park Original Message From:Tori Armstrong<toriteaches@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2:40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> • Subject: Opposition to Light Show in HB Central Park [Some people who received this message don't often get email from toriteaches@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park.While I understand the desire to bring new and exciting events to our community, I believe that the potential negative impacts of this particular event on the park's delicate ecosystem and the community's overall well-being outweigh any perceived benefits. My primary concerns revolve around the potential harm to the park's natural habitat, particularly for migrating birds, including the Bald Eagle, as well as the Monarch butterflies.The proposed light show, with its bright lights and amplified sounds,will undoubtedly disrupt the natural behaviors of these sensitive species. Light pollution and noise can disorient and distress migratory birds, potentially affecting their navigation,feeding, and nesting patterns. Furthermore,the increased foot traffic associated with the event will likely add additional stress to the environment,further damaging the fragile balance of the natural habitat.The Monarch butterflies, known to hibernate in areas close to the park,are also at risk from these disturbances. I am also concerned that the light show will displace other valuable community events that currently utilize the park, such as the Civil War and Revolutionary War Reenactment, and the Cherry Blossom Festival.These events contribute significantly to the community's cultural heritage and provide opportunities for residents to connect with history and enjoy a shared experience. I believe that these events and the light show,while both potentially enjoyable,are not compatible and that the park's resources are limited. Central Park serves as a vital green space for our community. It provides a much-needed retreat from the hustle and bustle of city life,offering a place for relaxation, recreation,and connection with nature.The proposed light show threatens to diminish the tranquility and natural beauty of the park, detracting from its value as a place of respite for residents. In.conclusion, I urge you to reconsider the approval of the proposed light show in Huntington Beach Central Park. I believe that the potential for damage to the park's ecosystem,the disruption to migrating birds and Monarch butterflies, and the displacement of other community events outweigh any perceived advantages. I encourage the City Council to prioritize the preservation of the park's natural environment and its continued value to the Huntington Beach community. 1 Thank you for your time and consideration. Victoria Armstrong 714-814-6947 2 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:22 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW: No to Light Show in the Park Original Message From:April Downs<thedownsfamily03@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18,2025 3:07 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: CityCouncil@surfcity-hb.org Subject: No to Light Show in the Park The light show in the park will be disruptive to the entire Park environment and ruin it for our citizens. In addition, there's a mating pair of bald eagles,and other wildlife which will be disturbed. To take over our Park for eight months out of the year is an insane idea.At best, it should be put to a vote of the entire city, not decided upon by the city Council. April Downs Sent from my iPhone 1 Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:23 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:Agenda Item 25-017 - Symphony From: Igeisse@aol.com <Igeisse@aol.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 3:38 PM To:CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Item 25-017-Symphony Some people who received this message don't often get email from Igeisse@aol.com.Learn why this is important Dear Friends on the City Council, Despite the fact that I have supported you each from day one, I am also a defender of Section 612 of the City Charter, or, as we initially wrote it, Measure C. It is clear to me that the License is actually a lease for Parkland in our city, despite all the obvious attempts to hide it. As such, turning over our parks to any outside agency for this period of time would require a majority vote of the citizens of Huntington Beach before it can be approved. At this point, we will be willing to go to court to protect the City Charter. Thanks. Larry Geisse, M.D. i Moore, Tania From: Fikes, Cathy Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 1:23 PM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: FW:Agenda Item#24 Symphony of Flowers at Central Park February 17, 2014 From:Jacquelyn Clarke<cjackie@msn.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 18, 2025 3:42 PM To: CITY COUNCIL(INCL. CMO STAFF)<city.council@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:Agenda Item#24 Symphony of Flowers at Central Park February 17, 2014 Some people who received this message don't often get email from cjackie@msn.com. Learn why this is important Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am writing to Oppose Agenda Item #24 Symphony of Flowers at Central Park. I am NOT opposed to the Symphony of Flowers at some other (non-park) location in HB. It simply is not a suitable business to operate at Central Park. I believe it is the responsibility of council to PROTECT our parks and open spaces that truly enhance our quality of life. Central Park is not only a place of respite for citizens but a sanctuary for nature and wildlife. (which will see negative effects from the light show). This proposal is a blow to numerous volunteers who spend their time tending to the park, raising funds to keep it maintained and beautiful, and to every person who visits it. I am including a link for you to watch which clearly shows there is no way this proposal can be a benefit to our valued park's flora and fauna. Nature needs our attention and a council that actually cares and respects our city's open space would strive to guard it with dignity. I implore you to delay voting on this until another site is found and more agreeable to the citizens of Huntington Beach. Jacquelyn Clarke https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PidsriRS94A 1 SYMPHONY OF FLOWERS - A NEW CREATION BY CAVALIA www.youtube.com 2 Moore, Tania From: jenny <jennyhus@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 6:55 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Concerns regarding proposed light show at Central Park You don't often get email from jennyhus@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important Dear Huntington Beach City Council, My name is Jennifer Nyhus, and I grew up in this community and raised my family here in Huntington Beach.This is my first time writing to the city council, but I feel compelled to express my growing concerns about the direction the city is taking. I have lost faith in the city's commitment to serving the best interests of the community. While there are multiple agenda items that concern me, I want to specifically address the proposed light show in our beautiful Central Park, a beloved space that is home to wildlife and enjoyed by residents daily. My husband and I own a home directly across from the park, and we walk there daily to appreciate its natural beauty. A light show in the park would significantly detract from the serene environment we are fortunate to have. I urge the city council to consider the impact this project would have on both the wildlife and the community.The introduction of an artificial light display, coupled with an increase in traffic and foot traffic, will undoubtedly disrupt the park's ecosystem. I would like to know if the residents have an opportunity to vote on this proposal. If the community is opposed to this idea, why is it even being considered? Does the city council prioritize the wants and needs of the residents, or is the focus solely on initiatives that may serve other interests? I respectfully ask that you reconsider this proposal and take the community's concerns seriously. Sincerely, Jennifer Nyhus Moore, Tania From: Anna <anna@annachild.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 8:03 AM To: supplementalcomm@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Do not disturb the bald eagles, please You don't often get email from anna@annachild.com. Learn why this is important I just now found out that there's a light show being planned to be installed at Central Park. I haven't had a chance to look at much of this, but, bald eagles are protected by federal law. Please don't disturb these beautiful animals. I believe they're still on the come back from almost being extinct. ANNA CHILD ANNA CHILD GROUP 714-398-6915 DRE#01858392 @anna.child@cbrealty.com @ AnnaChildGroup.com 19440 Goldenwest St Huntington Beach, CA 92648 *Wire Fraud is Real*. Before wiring any money, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions. Additionally, please note that the sender does not have authority to bind a party to a real estate contract via written or verbal communication. 1 CBM Michelle N.Black Main Office Phone: Email Address: 310-798-2400 Carstens, Black & Minteer LLP mnb@cbcearthlaw.com 700 North Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 200 Direct Dial: Redondo Beach, CA 90277 310-798-2412 www.cbcearthlaw.com March 26, 2025 J'ia U.S. Mail Lisa Lane Barnes, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: City of Huntington Beach Approval of Addendum to Master Environmental w Impact Report -- C) Dear Ms. Barnes, ry Please take notice that Protect HB plan to file a Petition for Writ of Mandate challenging the City of Huntington Beach, and its City Council, (collectively, the City)to = comply with the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") in approving an addendum to the Master Environmental Impact Report("MEIR"), allowing the installation of an LED-light powered flower project at the Huntington Beach Central Park ("Project"). Sincerely. Michelle N. Black